Loading...
CCE Presentation Community Choice Energy Town Council Meeting December 15, 2015 WHAT IS COMMUNITY CHOICE ENERGY? 2 Why are Communities Considering This? C O M M U N I T Y C H O I C E E N E R G Y Transportation and Electricity Consumption are largest community contributors to GHG Transforming Electricity Sourcing can significantly reduce GHG Emissions Greenhouse Gas Reduction Increasing Renewable Energy 3    C O M M U N I T Y C H O I C E E N E R G Y THE PARTNERSHIP Original Partners Sunnyvale Cupertino Mountain View Santa Clara County Additional Partners Los Gatos Campbell Gilroy Los Altos Los Altos Hills Monte Sereno Morgan Hill Saratoga 4    Composition by Jurisdiction C O M M U N I T Y C H O I C E E N E R G Y 5 SVCCEP GOALS C O M M U N I T Y C H O I C E E N E R G Y R enewable energy supply options that exceed PG&E levels Reduce GHG emissions Provide competitive, potentially lower, electricity rates for all customers Facilitate the use of clean technology, local clean power, and other energy innovations Create and maintain a local public agency that is well managed and financially sustainable 6    Technical Study C O M M U N I T Y C H O I C E E N E R G Y Scenario 1 Scenario 2 Scenario 3 Ye a r 1 Renewable 36% 51% 76% GHG-free 63% 70% 85% Cost 4% savings 3% savings 1% savings Ye a r 1 0 Renewable 49% 66% 76% GHG-free 75% 80% 97% Cost 3% savings 1% savings Rate Parity PGE Renewable 27%; mandated 33% by 2020 and 50% by 2030 7    Risks C O M M U N I T Y C H O I C E E N E R G Y Risk Mitigation Financial Risk- What if CCE fails? •Could lose initial investment •JPA structure buffers Partner liability •Required bond posting supports return of customers to PG&E bundled service Rates not Competitive •Use conservative estimates •Do not guarantee cheaper but competitive •Invest in energy contracting expertise •Phase in conservation programs 8    Community Engagement C O M M U N I T Y C H O I C E E N E R G Y Community Meetings Round 1 (6 meetings) complete Round 2 in December/January January 13 – Los Altos January 25 – Campbell TBD – Los Gatos and Saratoga Business Engagement Business Forum Meeting – early 2016 Customer Noticing 60 days before service 9    Potential Actions for Los Gatos C O M M U N I T Y C H O I C E E N E R G Y Council Action Council preparatory info tonight then: Adopt CCE Ordinance Resolution to Join JPA Approve Cost-sharing Contribution Target of March 31, 2016 First JPA meeting in April 2016 10    JPA Agreement C O M M U N I T Y C H O I C E E N E R G Y Key Provisions: Purpose Board of Directors Voting Funding of Initial Costs Withdrawal Provisions 11    Fiscal Impact C O M M U N I T Y C H O I C E E N E R G Y Party Phase 1 Phase 2 and 3 Phase 2 & 3 w/Contingency Campbell -- $100,000 $150,000 Cupertino $170,000 $350,000 $450,000 Gilroy -- $100,000 $150,000 Los Altos -- $100,000 $150,000 Los Altos Hills -- $25,000 $25,000 Los Gatos -- $100,000 $150,000 Monte Sereno -- $25,000 $25,000 Morgan Hill -- $100,000 $150,000 Mountain View $170,000 $350,000 $450,000 Santa Clara County (Unincorporated) $170,000 $350,000 $450,000 Saratoga -- $100,000 $150,000 Sunnyvale $170,000 $350,000 $450,000 Total $680,000 $2,050,000 $2,750,000 12    Schedule C O M M U N I T Y C H O I C E E N E R G Y 13 RECOMMENDATION Provide Feedback on the Program Direct the Town Manager to Return with: Enabling Ordinance Resolution to Execute JPA Agreement Funding Solution for $150,000 Startup Costs 14