Loading...
Attachment 1 with Exhibit 1-14• TOWN OF LOS GATOS · PLAL~"'ING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Meeting Date: January 27, 2016 ITEM NO: 3 PREPARED BY: APPLICATION NO: LOCATION: APPLICANT/ CONTACT PERSON: PROPERTY OWNER: Erin Walters, Associate Planner ewalters@losgatosca. gov Jennifer Savage, Senior Planner jsavage@losgatosca. gov Subdivision Application M-15-001 Architecture and Site Applications S-15-009 through S-15-0 11 15975 Union Avenue Oocated at the northwest comer of Union A venue and Blossom Hill Road) Gary Kolhsaat Betchart Union Av e Joint Venture Partnership APPLICATION SUMMARY: Requesting approval to demolish an existing single-family residence, subdivide one lot into three lots, construct three new single--family residences, and remove large protected trees on property zonedR~1:10 . APN 523-42~017 . RECOMMENDATION: PROJECT DATA: DEEMED COMPLETE: December 23, 2015 FINAL DATE TO TAKE ACTION: June 23,2016 Approve, subject to Conditions of Approval General Plan Designation: Zoning Designation: Low Density Residential R-1:10-Single-Family Residential, 1 0,000-square foot lot minimum Applicable Plans & Standards: General Plan; Residential Design Guidelines; Hillside Development Standards and Guidelines Parcel Size: 43 ,103 square feet Surrounding Area: Existing Land Use General Plan Zoning North Residential Low Density Residential R-1 :8 East Residential Low Density Residential R-1:10 Sout~ Residential Hillside HR.-1 West Residential Low Density Residential R~l:lO ATTACHMENT 1 Planning Commission Staff Report-Page 2 15975 Union Avenue/M-15-001/S-15-009 through S-15-011 January 27, 2016 CEQA: FINDINGS: CONSIDERATIONS: ACTION: EXHIBITS: The project is Categorically Exempt pursuant to the adopted Guidelines for the Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act, Section 15303: New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures and Section 15315: Minor Land Divisions. • As required, pursuant to the adopted Guidelines for the Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act, this project is Categorically Exempt, Section 15303 : New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures and Section 15315: Minor Land Divisions. • As required by Section 29.10.09030(e) of the Town Code for the demolition of a single-family residence. • As required by the Residential Design Guidelines that the project complies with the Residential Design Guidelines. • As required by Section 664 7 4 of the Subdivision Map Act if the Planning Commission denies the subdivision application. • As required by Section 29.20.150 of the Town Code for granting approval of Architecture and Site applications. The decision of the Planning Commission is final unless appealed within ten days. 1. Location Map 2. Findings (two pages) 3. Recommended Conditions of Approval (18 pages) 4 . CDAC Meeting Minutes (two pages) 5. Project Data Sheets (three pages) 6 . Applicant's Letter, received April10, 2015 (five pages) 7. Applicant's Summary of Changes, received November 24, 2015 (three pages) 8. Applicant's Arborist Report, received on February 10, 2015 (34 pages) 9. Town's Consulting Arborist Report, received on April3, 2015 (nine pages) 10. Original Development Plans, received on February 10,2015 and reviewed by the Town's Consulting Architect (32 pages) 11. Town's Consulting Architect report, received April6, 2015 (five pages) 12. Drainage Issues and Solutions Memorandum from nearby subdivision (three pages) Planning Commission StaffReport-Page 3 15975 Union Avenue/M-15-001/S-15-009 through S-15-011 January 27,2016 BACKGROUND: 13. Public Comments received July 26,2015 through 1:00 p.m. January 21, 2016 (22 pages) 14. Currently proposed Development Plans, received on November 24, 2015 (36 pages) The existing site contains a single-family dwelling and a detached garage. The current property access is located at the northeast comer of the site from Union Avenue. The site contains 67 protected trees and underlying vegetation. The site slopes downward from the southwest comer to the northeast comer and sits well below Blossom Hill Road in some areas. Preliminary plans were reviewed by the Conceptual Development Advisory Committee (CDAC) on August 13, 2014. CDAC meeting minutes are included as Exhibit 3. The applicant provided responses to CDAC comments in the applicant's letter (Exhibit 6). The project was reviewed by the Development Review Committee (DRC) on August 4, 2015. Public notices were mailed on July 24, 2015. Beginning on July 26, 2015, neighbors submitted comments raising several concerns including structure height and site drainage. These concerns are discussed in the Analysis Section below. The applicant and staff have worked to address the neighbor's concerns, including revisions to the storm water drainage plan. The applicant met with the neighbors to discuss the project, concerns, and revisions. For reference purposes Sheet A4.1 of Exhibit 14 shows adjacent properties, house numbers, and streets. The applicant's letter (Exhibit 6) describes the project and its design. Exhibit 7 describes the changes the applicant made following the DRC meeting in August. The project is being forwarded to the Planning Commission because neighbors have concerns that could not be resolved. PROJECT DE SCRIPTION: A. Subdivision Application The applicant is proposing to subdivide one lot into three lots. All three lots would have frontage on Blossom Hill Road. The eastern most lot would also have frontage on Union Avenue. Lot 1 would be approximately 12,941 square feet, Lot2 would be approximately 11,351 square feet, and Lot 3 would be approximately 11,353-square feet. All three lots would be accessed by a shared driveway from Union A v enue, located in the same area as the existing access. Planning C ommission StaffReport-P age 4 1597 5 Union Av enue/M-15 -001/S-15-009 through S-15-011 January 2 7 , 2016 B . Architecture and Site Applications The applicant is proposing to construct three single-family residences with attached garages. Lot 1 would contain a residence of 3,368 square feet and a 760-square foot garage. The residence would have a maximum height of27 feet, one inch. Materials would include: painted wood lap siding and shingles; vinyl clad windows with wood trim; and a composition shingle roof. Lot 2 would contain a residence of 3,3 3 8 square feet and a 73 7 -square foot garage. The residence would have a maximum height of 26 feet, nine inches. Materials would include: sand finish stucco; vinyl clad casement windows with stucco molding trim; and a tile roof. Lot 3 would contain a residence of3,338 square feet and a 737-square foot garage. The residence would have a maximum height of 27 feet, eight inches. Materials would include: painted wood lap siding; wood windows with wood trim; and a composition shingle roof. A color and material board will be available at the Planning Commission meeting and Exhibit 4 includes general project data. C. Location and Surrounding Neighborhood The project site is located at the northwest comer of Union A v enue and Blossom Hill Road. Across Blossom Hill Road to the south, the properties are zoned Hillside Residential (Exhibit 1). All surrounding properties contain single-family residences. D. Zoning Compliance The proposed subdivision application complies with minimum lot frontage , depth, and size requirements. The proposed Architecture and Site Application comply with the height, structure coverage limitations, setback requirements, and required parking is being provided on-site. The zoning permits three lots and a single-family residence on each lot. ANALYS IS: A . Subdivision The applicant is proposing three lots that meet the minimum lot dimensions (see table below) required by Town Code: Planning Commission Staff Report -Page 5 15975 Union Avenue/M-15-001/S-15-009 through S-15-011 January27, 2016 Lot Dimension Analysis I Lot Required Proposed Required Depth Jlepth Frontage Lot 1 100 142 90 Lot2 100 142 80 Lot3 I 100 142 80 Proposed Frootage i 113 . i 80 • 80 I I I Town Code Section 29.10.087, Lot frontage, requires all lots to have frontage. Lot frontage is defined Town Code Section 29.10.020 as the property line of a lot abutting on a street, which affords access to a lot other than the side line of a corner lot. Lots 2 and 3 have frontage along Blossom Hill Road. This satisfies the lot frontage definition because the opportunity for access from Blossom Hill Road exists. Access for Lots 2 and 3 is provided from Union Avenue because Union Avenue has a lower traffic volume than Blossom Hill Road. The proposed subdivision lot sizes are comparable to other lot sizes in surrounding subdivisi on s. These subdivisions include two on Lasuen Court and one for Leewood Court (see aerial, page 3 ofExhibit 11). I -t ~ BLOSSOM · · ·· Hill··· ·RD ··-· · ' i ~3C ll ·· I ... ~ LJ D Further to the west is Nimrick Lane (see map above). Nimrick Lane provides access to properties similar to the proposed subdivision which are sloped upwards towards Blossom Hill Road, elev ated above residences to the north, and the accessed by a shared driveway. The properties are not located in Los Gatos but provide context for residences along Blossom Hill Road without a driveway from Blossom Hill Road. Planning Commission StaffReport-Page 6 15975 Union Avenue/M-15-001/S-15-009 through S-15-011 January 27, 2016 Neighbors are concerned that the proposed project was not properly communicated by onsite markers. Prior to noticing for the Planning Commission meeting, the applicant installed markers to indicate property lines and revised the height poles to reflect the revised plans. Neighbors asked if the project could be a two-lot, flag lot subdivision. While the applicant could request two lots, instead of three, the proposed three-lot subdivision complies with applicable policies, regulations, and guidelines. Additionally, the General Plan discourages corridor lots (also known as flag lots) but allows the subdivider to demonstrate a corridor lot proposal meets certain provisions (See General Plan Policy LU-4.5). B. Vehicle Access and Parking The proposed shared driveway would be 18 to 20 feet wide. This width allows for fire vehicle access. The shared driveway must remain clear as well as the garage apron for Lot 3 which contains the fire vehicle turnaround. The fire department access requirements are not served from Blossom Hill Road due to the grade difference -as high as 14 feet between the finished elevation at the southwest comer of Lot 3 and the right-of-way elevation (Sheet 7 of Exhibit 14). The shared driveway and Lot 3's driveway apron are required to be signed and marked (Condition #58 of Exhibit 3). The requirement to keep these areas clear must be included in the CC&Rs (Condition #58 of Exhibit 3). The shared driveway would exit onto Union Avenue. At the August 13, 2014 CDAC meeting, site access off ofUnion Avenue was preferred for the subject site (Exhibit 4). Access from Union A venue is preferred over Blossom Hill Road because the: traffic volumes on Union Avenue are lower than those on Blossom Hill Road; residents will be able to tum right or left; there are adequate gaps in traffic flow to allow left turns onto Union A venue; and the distance from Blossom Hill Road allows adequate visibility. Each lot would contain a three car garage. Three car garages are compatible with the three car garages on Leewood Court and Lasuen Court. An additional two uncovered parking spaces would be located on Lot 1. The current design does not include pervious pavers for the garage aprons or driveway (see Drainage section below). Staff recommends stamped concrete at the driveway entry and the garage aprons to provide texture and interest that the pervious pavers would have provided (Condition #16 ofExhibit3). Neighbor concerns regarding vehicle access and parking include: • Whether sidewalks should be required. • That parking be prohibited along Union Avenue. • Lights and noise associated with opening and closing the garage for Lot I will disturb 100 Lasuen Court. Planning Commission Staff Report -Page 7 15975 Union Avenue/M-15-001/S-15-009 through S-15-011 January 27,2016 • The shared driveway is too close to the property line and more space, curbs, and a sidewalk should be required. • Whether the width of the driveway accommodates one vehicle and emergency vehicles. • Why the driveway is called a driveway when it can accommodate two-way traffic. • Requested the garages to be set back from the shared driveway. Sidewalks are required as a condition of approval along Blossom Hill Road and Union Avenue (Condition #71 of Exhibit 3). The proposed driveway does not require a sidewalk. Currently, it is possible to park along1he curb in the public right-of-way on Union Avenue just south ofLasuen Court, north of the proposed shared driveway. This condition will remain. After public improvements, there will be space for parking south of the proposed driveway. Parking spaces would not be marked and parking would be permitted unless it conflicts with public improvements. The applicant's landscape plans show a six-foot tall fence and tall shurbs (Pittosporum tenuifolium) that would help shield noise and light from Lot 1 's garage to 100 Lasuen Court. The tall shrubs proposed along the fence line are fast growing shrubs with a height of20 to 30 feet at maturity. Staff included a condition (Condition #9 of Exhibit 3) for the tall shrubs proposed along that fence to be planted at a 24 inch box size to provide landscape screening sooner. Staff also included an option for an eight foot ~1 fence, where it does not interfere with traffic visibility, to help shield light and noise (Condition #14 of Exhibit 3). The driveway is set four feet from the property and the project includes landscaping and fencing to provide separation from adjacent properties. A curb is also included as part of the project. The width of the driveway allows room for pedestrians and vehicles to pass. Vehicles will be able to turnaround in the garage aprons with the exception of Lot 1, where vehicles will be able to turnaround in the two surface parking spaces. The width of the shared driveway accommodates two vehicles and meets the fire department's access requirements. Town Code requi~ that all off street parking garages be connected to streets by driveways as long as they are no less than 18 feet wide and provide both ingress and egress which this project provides. The shared driveway is accessed from Union A venue, and there is driveway access to each property. The proposed garages meet setbacks and are set forward from the residence. The proposed setbacks for the garages exceed the minimum required setbacks (the structures are setback further than front and rear setbacks would require). The garages on Lasuen Court also meet required setbacks and are set forward from the residence. Planning Commission Staff Report-Page 8 15975 Union Avenue/M-15-001/S-15-009 through S-15-011 January 27, 2016 C. Public Improvements In addition to public right-of-way dedications for Union Avenue and Blossom Hill Road, the project requires public improvements which include: curb, gutter, and sidewalks along Union A venue and Blossom Hill Road; traffic signal relocation; upgrading signal lights to LED fixtures; and pedestrian crossing improvements. A public improvement plan is required prior to issuance of building permits or recordation of a parcel map (Condition #71,73 and 74 ofExhibit 3). The following public improvements will be included: • Parking on Union Avenue along the project's eastern property line may possible but would not be marked. • There would be one straight/left turn lane and a lane to turn right. • The project would not result in two lanes traveling southbound on Union A venue except for the small length of delineation for right turns onto Blossom Hill Road. • Parking may possible on Blossom Hill Road. A diagram of the public improvements will be provided in a Desk Item. D. Floor Area Based on Town and County records, the residences in the immediate neighborhood range in size from 2,211 square feet to 3,761 square feet. The floor area ratios (FAR)range from 0.04 FAR to 0.32 FAR. The proposed residences would be 3,338 to 3,368 square feet with 0.26 to 0.29 FAR. Pursuant to Town Code, based on the proposed lot sizes and averages slopes, the maximum square footage for the lots are 3,697 for Lot 1, and 3,396 for Lots 2 and3 . Planning Commission Staff Report-Page 9 15975 Union Avenue/M-15-001/S-15-009 through S-15 -011 January 27, 2016 The following Neighborhood Analysis table reflects current conditions of the immediate neighborhood. Neighborhood An~ysis Address House Garage Lot size FAR 15055 Blossom Hill Road 2,211 480 10,000 0.22 15085 Blossom Hill Road 3,487 528 15,792 0.22 100 Lasuen Court 3,199 587 10,018 0.32 15054 Blossom Hill Road 3,761 816 43,560 0.09 15010 Blossom Hill Road 2,734 660 46,575 0.06 14970 Blossom Hill Road 2,247 506 50,460 0.04 101 Leewood Court 3,128 560 10,000 0.31 106 Leewood Court 3,128 560 10,174 0.31 100 Leewood Court 3,164 632 10,937 0.29 15975 Union Ave-Lot 1 3,368 760 12,941 0.26 15975 Union Ave-Lot 2 3,338 737 11,351 0.29 15975 Union Ave-Lot 3 3,338 737 11,353 0.29 The Residential Design Guidelines specify that consideration will be given to the existing F ARs, residential square footages, and lot sizes in the neighborhood. With proposed square footage between 3,338 and 3 ,368 square feet, the residences would be compatible with homes in the immediate neighborhood in terms of square footage. With proposed FAR between 0 .26 and 0.29, the residences would be compatible with homes in the inunediate neighborhood in terms ofF AR. Pursuant to Town Code, based on the proposed lot sizes, the maximum square footage for the garages are 1,004 square feet for Lot 1, and 933 square feet for Lots 2 and 3. The proposed garage sizes of737 and 760 are under the maximum garage square footage. Although they would not be the largest garage (15054 Blossom Hill Road hac; a garage of 816 square feet), staff considered whether the proposed garage size was appropriate. Given the garage location and that they are not visible from the street, staff believes the proposed three-car garages are consistent with the Residential Design Guidelines (guideline 2.4.2). Additionally, there are three car garages on Lasuen and Leewood Courts. E . Architectural Considerations Staff requested that the Town's Architectural Consultant review the project (Exhibit11) to provide recommendations regarding architecture and neighborhood compatibility. The Consultant found the homes to be well designed with visual variety and appropriate details Planning Commission Staff Report-Page 10 15975 Union Avenue/M-15-001/S-15-009 through S-15-011 January 27, 2016 for the proposed architectural styles. He also found the footprint size of the homes to be similar to those nearby. The Consultant identified two issues (Exhibit 11 ). The first issue, less front porch depth than required by the Residential Design Guidelines, was acceptable given that the porches for Lots 2 and 3 do not face the street and both homes have private open space elsewhere. The second issue was inconsistent paving material between plan sheets. The current design (Exhibit 14) will require impervious driveway and garage aprons to capture drainage onsite as opposed to allowing water to draining directly to the storm drain system. To provide texture and interest, staff is requiring stamped concrete at the driveway entrance and the garage aprons (Condition 16 of Exhibit 3). Neighbors raised concerns that the proposal was not in keeping with the surrounding neighborhood. The Residential Design Guidelines specify that residential development shall be similar in mass, bulk, and scale to the immediate neighborhood. Although the consultant found the proposed mass to be in keeping with the surrounding properties, the applicant revised the plans to lower the height (see analysis below) in an attempt to address neighbor's concerns. F . Height The Residential Design GUidelines specify that residential dev elopment shall be similar in mass, bulk, and scale to the immediate neighborhood. The majority of homes in the immediate neighborhood are two stories with attached garages. Most of the homes located south of Blossom Hill Road are one story. However, these homes are located in the Hillside zone upslope from the subject site with larger lots and greater setbacks. The project has similar mass and scale as the homes to the west, north, and east (see Streetscapes on Sheet A4.2 of Exhibit 14). Neighbors requested that the applicant reduce the height of the structures and add landscaping screening. The applicant describes the changes they made to the project to address neighbor concerns (Exhibit 7) including: • Moving the footprints away from the properties to the north • Reducing the roof pitch for Lot 2. • Modifying the garage design for Lot 2. Neighbors also raised concerns regarding the plate height of the proposed structures. The applicant considered the concern and explains why the plate height cannot be reduced in Exhibit 7. Planning Commission Staff Report-Page 11 15975 union AvenueM-15-001/S-15-009 through S-15-011 January 27,2016 G. Shadows Neighbors raised concerns regarding the shadows that would result from the proposed project. Shadows created during the winter and summer solstices are iilustrated on Sheet A4.3 of Exhibit 14 during three different times (9:00am, 12:00 noon, and 3:00pm). Shadows are created on neighboring properties during the middle of winter in the morning and late afternoon hours. H. Privacy A neighbor raised concerns regarding lack of privacy from the new residence's windows into the backyard of their home. The second floor of Lot 2 is 89 to 110 feet away from the adjacent property (see Sheet A4.4 of Exhibit 14). Additionally, the neighbor's existing trees provide some landscape screening. A concern was also raised regarding ~terior lighting. Exterior lighting is required to be kept to minimum by Town Code and Condition #3 of Exhibit 3. Town Code also requires limiting glare onto neighboring properties. Staff included an additional condition to check that installed lighting is directed away from properties to the north or shielded to be directed on-site. The project also includes proposed landscaping and staff included conditions regarding replacement tree size and landscape screening (Conditions #8 and 9 of Exhibit 3). I. Drainage The project originally included storm water site design measures to drain towards the shared driveway, penneate through pervious pavers, and then enter the storm drain system through a perforated pipe installed underground (Sheet 6 of Exhibit 10). The Town's C.3 Consultant found the design did not meet required California State Water Board site design requirements for stormwater runof£ During the DRC public hearing process, Town staff was reminded by the neighbors that the area has historically experience high soil moisture content, high water tables during storms, and flooding. Many of the nearby homes have basement pumps to extract the water from their basements. Some water pumps have failed in the past which emphasizes concerns regarding drainage. The applicant's geotechnical investigation did attempt to locate the groundwater level but was unable to do so since the area is experiencing a drought. The low moisture level did not reflect the drainage and flooding experienced by surrounding neighbors during past storms. In addition, the public storm water system does not have the capacity to handle the originally proposed storm water from the proposed project. Planning Commission Staff Report-Page 12 15975 Union Avenue/M-15-001/S-15-009 through S-15-011 January 27, 2016 The applicant redesigned the project to capture the site's water onsite in three bioretention ponds (one on each new lot; see Sheet 6 of Exhibit 14). Water from individual sites is directed by gentle slopes around the homes and into the biorentention ponds. The biotreament swale along Union Avenue is also included in the project design. The Town's C.3 (Storm water) Consultant reviewed the revised design and determined that the design meets C.3 storm water requirements. The current design also reduces the capacity demand of the public storm water system by retaining most of the water onsite in the bioretention ponds. Finally, the bioretention ponds are designed in such a way that excess rain water during a large storm event will be conveyed directly to the Town's storm drain system, thus greatly reducing the possibility of the water draining towards the neighboring properties and infiltrating the groundwater system. Neighbors raised the following concerns regarding drainage: • Drainage patterns, due to the area's topography, coupled with the proposed project would make adjacent property drainage issues worse. • Storm drain catch basin near the southwest comer of the site is not connected to the storm drain system and causes issues for properties to the east of the site. • Drainage was an issue for the subdivision located at 15928 Union Avenue, located north east of the subject project. • Sump pump failures which neighbor's raised during the public review process for the subject application. • Clay type soil and high water tables. The current storm water drainage design captures the project's storm water onsite and, in the case of a heavy storm, directs overflow to the public storm drain system. This reduces the potential impact of storm water to other properties. In the existing condition, leaves and debris gather and buildup during the Fall and Winter months at the existing storm drain catch basin immediately adjacent to the southwest comer of the site in the Blossom Hill right-of way. Currently this existing catch basin is nottied into the public storm drain system but instead drains into an existing public service easement on the neighboring property west of the development. Curb, gutter and sidewalk does not exist east of this structure along the development's Blossom Hill Road frontage; however, as a part of this project new curb, gutter, and sidewalk will be constructed in this area, continuing around the northwestern comer of the intersection with Union A venue, then continuing north along Union Avenue. New curb cuts will be provided with the Union A venue improvements for stormwater conveyance into a new bioretention swale, allowing for a portion of the drainage currently being conveyed into the public service easement to instead be ultimately directed to the new swale. These improvements would reduce the load on the storm drain catch basin in question reducing the impact on the Planning Commission Staff Report-Page 13 15975 Union Avenue/M-15-001/S-15-009 through S-15-011 January 27, 2016 affected properties at 15065 and 15055 Blossom Hill Road. The project would not repair drainage facilities on the private property of 15065 and 15055 Blossom Hill Road. This project meets the requirements to capture storm water onsite. Although the project is not responsible for past sump pump failures, the project's design will reduce the impact of storm water for adjacent properties by capturing water onsite and facilitating better water flow along the street. The current design includes lined bioretention ponds (Sheet 10 of Exhibit 14). These do not facilitate infiltration into the clay soils with potentially high water tables. Stormwater conveyed to the bioretention ponds filter through the bio-treatment soil. These ponds also include a perforated pipe underdrain at the bottom of the facility to collect and convey any excess or standing water to the Town's storm drain system. In conclusion, the applicant has redesigned the project's proposed stormwater treatment facilities to address the neighbor's concerns regarding surface drainage and the presence of the high groundwater table. J. Tree Impacts The project site contains 112 trees (on-site and adjacent); 67 are protected trees, 45 are not protected. The applicant is proposing to remove all on-site trees. Thirteen (13) of the protected trees proposed for removal are large fruit or nut trees, but also include an 84-inch Blue Gum Eucalyptus, and a 30-inch Willow. The applicant provided an Arborist report for the site (Exhibit 8) which was reviewed by the Town's Consulting Arborist (Exhibit 9). The Consulting Arborist made recommendations to attempt to save the redwood tree (tree #1723) located on the eastern portion of the site. The Consultant found, like the applicant's arborist, that the tree is only in fair condition. Due to the new public sidewalk, required biotreatment swale, and the house's front porch, the tree could not be saved. The Consultant also made recommendations for protecting the four trees on the neighbor's property. Tree protection is required as a condition of approval (Condition # 7 of Exhibit 3) and shown on the plans (Sheet L1 of Exhibit 14). If the project is approved, tree protection measures would be implemented prior to and during construction. Replacement trees will be planted to mitigate the loss of trees being removed pursuant to Town Code. The number of trees and size of replacement trees will be determined using the canopy replacement table in the Town Code. Town Code requires a minimum 24-inch box size replacement tree. If all replacement trees cannot be reasonably planted on the subject property, a combination of replacement trees and an in-lieu payment will be paid. Planning Commission Staff Report-Page 14 15975 UnionAvenue/M-15-001/S-15-009 through S-15-011 January 27, 2016 K . Environmental Review The project is Categorically Exempt pursuant to the adopted Guidelines for the Implementation of California Environmental Quality Act, Section 15303: New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures and Section 15315: Minor Land Divisions. PUBLIC COMMENTS: The Town received public comments when the project was scheduled for the Development Review Committee meeting. These comments and additional comments are included in Exhibit 13 . The applicant informed staff that they have met with and continue to communicate with adjacent neighbors. COORDINATION: Planning staff coordinated with the Parks and Public Works Engineering and Traffic divisions and the Santa Clara County Fire Department. SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION: A. Summary As currently proposed, the project would create three lots with three single-family residences that are compatible with the immediate neighborhood. The project would also comply with the Residential Design Guidelines and with zoning requirements. The applicant has attempted to address neighbor's concerns regarding structure height and site drainage. Staff also included conditions to increase privacy, provide repla cement trees pursuant to Town Code, and provide texture for driveway materials. B. Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the Subdivision and Architecture and Site applications based on the summary above. If the Planning Commission finds merit with the proposed project, it should: 1. Make the required finding pursuant to the adopted Guidelines for the Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act, that this project is Categorically Exempt, Section 15303: New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures and Section 15315: Minor Land Divisions; and 2. Make the required findings as required by Section 29.10.09030(e) of the Town Code for granting approval of demolition of a single-family residence (Exhibit 2); and 3. Make the finding that the project is in conformance with the Residential Design Guidelines (Exhibit 2); and Planning Commission Staff Report-Page 15 15975 Union Avenue/M-15-001/S-15-009 through S-15-011 January 27,2016 4. Do not make the finding required by Section 66474 of the Subdivision Map Act to deny the subdivision application. 5. Make the required considerations as required by Section 29.20.150 of the Town Code for granting approval of Architecture & Site applications (Exhibit 2); and 6. Approve Subdivision Application M-15-001 and Architecture and Site Applications S-15-009 through S-15-011 with the conditions contained in Exhibit 3 and development plans attached as Exhibit 14. ALTERNATNES: Alternatively, the Commission can: 1. Continue the matters to a date certain with specific direction; or 2. Approve the applications with additional and/or modified conditions; or 3. Deny the applications. prov by: Erin Walters oel Paulson, AICP Associate Planner Interim Community Development Director JSP:EMW:cg cc: Gary Kohlsaat, 51 University Avenue, Suite L, Los Gatos, CA 95030 Betchart Union Avenue Joint Venture Partnership, 349 Front Street, Los Altos, CA 94022 N:\DEV\PC REPORTS\20 16\UnionlS97S.docx This Page Intentionally Left Blank 15975 Union Avenue EXHIBIT 1 This Page Intentionally Left Blank PLANNING COMMISSION-January 27, 2016 REQUIRED FINDINGS FOR: 15975 Union Avenue Subdivision Application M-15-001 Architecture and Site Applications S-15-009 through S-15-011 Requesting approval to demolish an existing single-family residence, subdivide one lot into three lots, construct three new single-family residences, and remove large protected trees on property zoned R-1:10. APN 523-42-017. PROPERTY OWNER: Betchart Union Ave Joint Venture Partnership APPLICANT: Gary Kohlsaat, Architect FINDINGS Required fmding for CEQA: • The project is Categorically Exempt pursuant to the adopted Guidelin.es for the Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act, Section 15303: New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures and Section 15315: Minor Land Divisions. Required finding for the demolition of a single-family residence: • As required by Section 29.10.09030(e) of the Town Code for the demolition of a single- family residence: 1. The Town's housing stock will be maintained as the single-family residence will be replaced. 2. The existing structures have no architectural or historical significance, and are in poor condition. 3. The property owner does not desire to maintain the structures as they exist; and 4. The economic utility of the structures was considered. Required Compliance with the Residential Design Guidelines: • The project is in compliance with the Residential Design Guidelines for single-family homes not in hillside residential areas . Required fmdings to deny a Subdivision application: • As required by Section 66474 of the State Subdivision Map Act the map shall be denied if any of the following findings are made: None of the fmdings could be made to deny the application. a. That the proposed map is not consistent with all elements of the General Plan. b. That the design and improvement of the proposed subdivision is not consistent with all .EXHIBIT 2 Page 2 of2 1597 5 Union A venue/M-15-001 /S-15-009 through S-15-011 January 27, 2016 elements of the General Plan. c. That the site is not physically suitable for the proposed development. d. That the site is not physically suitable for the proposed density of development. e. That the designs of the subdivision or the proposed improvements are likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. f. That the design of the subdivision or type of improvements is likely cause serious public health problems. g. That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large , for access through or use of, property within the proposed subdivision. CONS ID ERA TIONS Required considerations in review of Architecture & Site applications: • As required by Section 29 .20 .150 of the Town Code, the considerations in review of an Architecture and Site application were all made in reviewing this project. N :\DEV\FINDfNGS\2 016\U nion 15975 .docx PLANNING COMMISSION -January 27, 2016 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 15975 Union Avenue Subdivision Application M-15-001 Architecture and Site Applications S-15-009 through S-15-011 Requesting approval to demolish an existing single-family residence, subdivide one lot into three lots, construct three new single-family residences, and remove large protected trees on property zoned R-1:10. APN 523-42-017. PROPERTY OWNER: Betcbart Union Ave Joint Venture Partnership APPLICANT: Gary KohJsaat, Architect TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT: Planning Division 1. APPROVAL: This application shall be completed in accordance with all of the conditions of approval listed below and in substantial compliance with the plans approved and noted as received b y the Town on November 24, 2015. Any changes or modifications to the approved plans shall be approved by the Community Development Director, the Development Review Committee, the Planning Commission, or Town Council , depending on the scope of the changes. 2 . EXPIRATION : The approval will expire two years from the approval date pursuant to Section 29 .20.320 of the Town Code, unless the approval has been vested. 3 . OUTDOOR LIGHTING : Exterior lighting shall be kept to a minimum, and shall be down directed fixtures that will not reflect or encroach onto adjacent properties. No flood lights shall be used unless it can be demonstrated that they are needed for safety or security. The lighting plan shall be reviewed during building plan check. 4 . GENERAL: AJl existing trees shown on the plan and trees required to remain or to be planted are specific subjects of approval of this plan, and must remain on the site. 5. TREE REMOVAL PERMIT: A Tree Removal Permit shall be obtained for any trees to be removed, prior to the issuance of a building or grading pennit. 6 . ARBORlST REQUIREMENTS: The developer shall implement, at their cost, all recommendations made by Monarch Consulting Arborists LLC and Deborah Ellis, MS , identified in the Arborist reports, dated as received February 10, 2015 and April 3, 2015, res pectively, on file in the Community Development Department. A Compliance Memorandum shall be prepared by the applicant and submitted with the building pennit app lication detailing how the recommendations ha ve or will be addressed . These recommendations must be incorporated in the building permit plans, and completed p1ior to issuance of a building permit where applicable. 7. TREE FENCING: Protective tree fencing shall be placed at the drip line of existing trees and shall remain through all phases of construction. Fencing shall be six foot high cyclone attached to two-inch diameter steel posts drive 18 inches into the ground and spaced no further than 10 feet apart. Include a tree protection fencing plan with the construction plans. 8. RE PLACEMENT TREES: New trees shall be planted to mitigate the loss of trees being removed. The number of trees and size of replacement trees shall be determined using the EXHIBIT 3 canopy replacement table in the Town Code. Town Code requires a minimum 24-inch box si z e replacement tree. New trees shall be double staked with rubber ties and shall be planted prior to final inspection and issuance of occupancy permits. 9. LANDSCAPE SCREENING: Landscape screening shall be planted along all property lines. Shrubs and tall shrubs shall be planted with larger than 5 -gallon size plants for faster land scape screening. A minimum 24-inch box size trees shall be planted, including some along the project's eastern property line, and large size trees shall be considered. 10. WATER EFFICIENCY LANDSCAPE ORDINANCE: The final landscape plan, including landscape and irrigation plans and calculations, shall meet the Town of Los Gatos Water Conservation Ordinance or the State Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance, whichever is more restrictive. The final landscape plan shall be reviewed by the Town's consultant prior to issuance of building permits . A review fee based on the current fe e schedule adopted b y the Town Council is required when working landscape and irrigation plans are submitted for review . 11. SALVAGE OF BUILDING MATERIALS : Prior to the issuance of a demolition permit, the developer shall provide the Community Development Director with written notice of the company that will be recycling the building materials. All wood , metal , glass, and aluminum materials generated from the demolished structure shall be deposited to a company which will recycle the materials. Receipts from the company(s) accepting these mate rials, noting the type and weight of materials, shall be submitted to the Town prior to the Town's demolition inspection. 12 . STORY POLES : The story poles on the project site shall be removed within 30 days of approval of the Architecture & Site application. 13 . BLOSSOM HILL ROAD FENCE HEIGHT: Fence height is limited to six feet from grade along Blossom Hill Road. Where fences are constructed on top of walls, the wall will count towards the total height, which may not exceed six feet. 14. OTHER FENCE HEIGHT: Fence height for fences not along Blossom Hill Road are limited to eight feet from grade and may not conflict with traffic view areas. Where fence s are constructed on top of walls , the wall will count towards the total height. 15 . BUILDING PERMIT PLANS: The building permit plans shall include correct calculations for allowable floor areas . The building permit plans shall be consistent between plan sheets, including references for retaining wall and fence details, fence heights, _pa vers , pipes, and chimneys. The applicant must include this information in the building permit plans prior to is suance of building permits. 16. DRIVEWAY MATERIAL: Stamped concrete shall be used at the driveway entrance and the garage aprons . Stamped concrete at these locations shall be shown on the building permit plans prior to issuance and be installed prior to final of building permits. 17. TOWN INDEMNITY: Applicants are notified that Town Code Section 1.10.115 requires that any applicant who receives a permit or entitlement from the Town shall defend , indemnify, and hold harmless the Town and its officials in any action brought by a third party to overturn, s et aside, or void the permit or entitlement. This requirement is a condition of approval of all such permits and entitlements whether or not expressly set forth in the approval , and may be secured to the satisfaction of the Town Attorney. Building Divis ion 18. PERMITS REQUIRED: A Demolition Permit shall be required for the demolition of the existing single-family residence and associated accessory structures and a Building Permit the construction of each new single-family residence with attached garage. A separate plan set is required for each lot. Separate permits are required for electrical, mechanical , and plumbing work as necessary. 19. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: The Conditions of Approval must be blue-lined in full on the cover sheet of the construction plans. A Compliance Memorandum shall be prepared and submitted with the Building Permit application detailing how the Conditions of Approval will be addressed. 20. SIZE OF PLANS: Four sets of construction plans, minimum size 24" x 36", maximum size 30" x 42". 21. DEMOLITION REQUIREMENTS: Obtain a Building Department Demolition Application and a Bay Area Air Quality Management District Application from the Building Department Service Counter. Once the demolition form has been completed, all signatures obtained, and written verification from PG&E that an utilities have been disconnected, return the completed form to the Building Department Service Counter with the Air Quality District's J# Certificate, PG&E verification, and three (3) sets of site plans showing all existing structures, existing utility service lines such as water, sewer, and PG&E. No demolition work shall be done without first obtaining a permit from the Town. 22. BUILDING ADDRESSES: Submit requests for new building addresses to the Building Division prior to submitting for the Building Permit application process. 23. SOILS REPORT: A Soils Report , prepared to the satisfaction of the Building Official, containing foundation and retaining wall design recommendations , shall be submitted with the Building Permit Application. This report shall be prepared by a licensed Civil Engineer specializing in soils mechanics. 24. FOUNDATION INSPECTIONS: A pad certificate prepared by a licensed Civil Engineer or Land Surveyor shall be submitted to the project building inspector at foundation inspection. This certificate shall certify compliance with the recommendations as specified in the soils report, and that the building pad elevation and on-site retaining wall locations and elevations have been prepared according to the approved plans. Horizontal and vertical controls shall be set and certified by a licensed Surveyor or registered Civil Engineer for the following items: a. Building pad elevation b. Finish floor elevation c . Foundation comer locations d. Retaining Walls 25 . RESIDENTIAL TOWN ACCESSIBILITY ST AND ARDS: The residence shall be designed with adaptability features for single family residences per Town Resolution 1994- 61: a. Wood backing (2 " x 8" minimum) shall be provided in all bathroom walls at water closets, showers, and bathtubs, located 34-inches from the floor to the center of the backing, suitable for the installation of grab bars. b. All passage doors shall be at least 32-inches wide on the accessible floor. c. Primary entrance shall be a 36-inch wide door including a 5'x5 ' level landing, no more than 1-inch out of plane with the immediate interior floor level with an 18 -i nch clearance at interior strike edge. d. Door buzzer, bell or chime shall be hard wired at primary entrance. 26 . TITLE 24 ENERGY COMPLIANCE: All required California Title 24 Energy Compliance Forms must be blue-lined, i.e. directly printed, onto a plan sheet. 27 . BACKWATER VALVE: The scope of this project may require the installation of a sanitary sewer backwater valve per Town Ordinance 6 .50.025. Please provide information on the plans if a backwater valve is required and the location of the installation. The Town of Los Gatos Ordinance and West Valley Sanitation District (WVSD) requires backwater valves on drainage piping serving fixtures that have flood level rims less than 12-inches above the elevation of the next upstream manhole. 28. TOWN FIREPLACE STANDARDS : New wood burning fireplaces shall be an EPA Phase II approved appliance or a gas appliance as per Town Ordinance 1905. Tree limbs shall be cut within 10-feet of Chimney. 29. FIRE ZONE: The project requires a Class A Roof assembly. 30. WILDLAND-URBAN INTERFACE: This project is located in a Wildland-Urban High Fire Interface Area and must comply with the materials and construction methods for exterior wildfire exposure requirements of Section R327 of the 2013 California Residential Code. 31. SPECIAL INSPECTIONS: When a special inspection is required by CBC Section 1704, the architect or engineer of record shall prepare an inspection program that shall be submitted to the Building Official for approval prior to issuance of the building permit. The Town Special Inspection form must be completely filled-out and signed by all requested parties prior to permit issuance. Special Inspection forms are available from the Building Division Service Counter or online at www.losgatosca.gov/building 32. BLUE PRINT FOR A CLEAN BAY SHEET: The Town standard Santa Clara County Valley Nonpoint Source Pollution Control Program Sheet (24x36) shall be part of the plan submittal as the second page. The specification sheet is available at the Building Division Service Counter for a fee of $2 or at ARC Blue Print for a fee or online at www .losgatosca.gov/building. 33. APPROVALS REQUIRED: The project requires the following departments and agencies approval before issuing a building permit: a. Community Development -Planning Division: Erin Walters at (408) 354-6867 b. Engineering/Parks & Public Works Dept.: Mike Weisz at (408) 354-5236 c. Santa Clara County Fire Department: (408) 378-4010 d. West Valley Sanitation District: (408) 378-2407 e. Local Schoo] District: The Town will forward the paperwork to the appropriate school district(s) for processing. A copy of the paid receipt is required prior to permit issuance. f. Bay Area Air Quality Management District: ( 415) 771-6000 TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE DIRECTOR OF PARKS AND PUBLIC WORKS : Engineering Division 34. GENERAL: All public improvements shall be made according to the latest adopted Town Standard Plans, Standard Specifications and Engineering Design Standards. All work shall conform to the applicable Town ordinances . The adjacent public right-of-way shall be kept clear of all job related dirt and debris at the end of the day. Dirt and debris shall not be washed into storm drainage facilities. The storing of goods and materials on the sidewalk and/or the street will not be allowed unless an encroachment permit is issued . The Developer's representative in charge shall be at the job site during all working hours. Failure to maintain the public right-of-way according to this condition may result in the Town performing the required maintenance at the Developer's expense. 35. APPROVAL: This application shall be completed in accordance with all the conditions of approvals listed below and in substantial compliance with the latest reviewed and approved development plans. Any changes or modifications to the approved plans or conditions of approvals shal1 be approved by the Town Engineer. 36. ENCROACHMENT PERMIT: All work in the public right-of-way will require a Construction Encroachment Permit. All work over $5,000 will require construction security. It is the responsibility of the Applicant/Developer to obtain any necessary encroachment permits from affected agencies and private parties, including but not limited to , Pacific Gas and Electric (PG&E), AT&T, Comcast, Santa Clara Val ley Water District , California Department of Transportation. Copies of any approvals or permits must be submitted to the Town Engineering Division of the Parks and Public Works Department prior to releasing any permit. 37. PUBLIC WORKS INSPECTIONS: The Developer or his representative shall notify the Engineering Inspector at least twenty-four (24) hours before starting any work pertaining to on-site drainage faci lities, grading or paving, and all work in the Town's right-of-way. Fai lure to do so will result in rejection of work that went on w ithout inspection. 38. RESTORATION OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS : The Developer shall repair or replace all existing improvements not designated for removal that are damaged or removed because of the Developer's operations. Improvements such as, but not limited to : curbs, gutters, sidewalks, driveways, signs, pavements, raised pavement markers, thermoplastic pavement markings, etc. shall be repaired and replaced to a condition equal to or better than the original condition. Any new concrete shall be free of stamps, logos , names, graffiti , etc. Any concrete identified that is clisplaying a stamp or equal shall be removed and replaced at the Contractor's so le expense and no additional compensation shall be allowed therefore. Existing improvement to be repaired or replaced shall be at the direction of the Engineering Construction Inspector, and shall comply with all Title 24 Disabled Access provisions. The Developer shall request a walk-through with the Engineering Construction Inspector before the start of construction to verify existing conditions. 39 . SITE SUPERVISION: The General Contractor shall provide qualified supervision on the job site at all times during construction. 40 . STREET CLOSURE: Any proposed blockage or partial closure of the street requires an encroachment permit. Special provisions such as limitations on works hours, protective enclosures, or other means to facilitate public access in a safe manner may be required. 41. PLAN CHECK FEES: Plan check fees shall be deposited with the Town prior to plan review at the Engineering Division of the Parks and Public Works Department. 42. INSPECTION FEES: Inspection fees shall be deposited with the Town prior to issuance of any Permit or recordation of the Parcel Map. 43 . DESIGN CHANGES: Any proposed changes to the approved plans shall be subject to the approval of the Town prior to altered work is started. The Applicant's project engineer shaIJ notify, in writing, the Town Engineer at least 72 hours in advance of al l the proposed changes. Any approved changes shall be incorporated into the fina l "as-built" plans .. 44 . PARKING: Any proposed parking restriction must be approved by The Town of Los Gatos, Community Development Department. 45. PLANS AND STUDIES: All required plans and studies shall be prepared by a Registered Professional Engineer in the State of California, and submitted to the Town Engineer for review and approval. 46. GRADING PERMIT: Grading permit is required for all site grading and drainage work except for exemptions listed in Section 12.20.015 of the Town Grading Ordinance. The grading permit application (with grading plans) shall be made to the Engineering Division of the Parks and Public Works Department located at 41 Miles Avenue. The grading plans shall include final grading, drainage, retaining wall location, driveway, utilities and interim erosion control. Grading plans shall list earthwork quantities and a table of existing and proposed impervious areas . Unless specifically allowed by the Director of Parks and Public Works, the grading permit will be issued concurrently with the building permit. The grading permit is for work outside the bui lding footprint(s). A separate building permit, issued by the Building Department on E. Main Street is needed for grading within the building footprint. 4 7. DR IVEWAY: The driveway conform to existing pavement on Union A venue shall be constructed such that existing drainage patterns will not be obstructed. 48. DRAINAGE STUDY: Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, the following drainage studies shall be submitted to and approved by the Town Engineer: A drainage study of the project including diversions, off-site areas that drain onto and/or through the project, and justification of any diversions; a drainage study evidencing that proposed drainage patterns will not overload existing storm drains; and detailed drainage studies indicating how the project grading, in conjunction with the drainage conveyance systems including applicable swales, channels, street flows, catch basins , storm drains, and flood water retarding, will allow building pads to be safe from inundation from rainfall runoff which may be expected from all storms up to and including the theoretical 100-year flood. 49 . DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENT: Prior to the recordation of a subdivision map (except maps for financing and conveyance purposes only) or prior to the issuance of any grading/improvement permits, whichever comes first , the Applicant shall : a) Design provisions for surface drainage ; and b) Design all necessary storm drain facilities extending to a satisfactory point of disposal for the proper control and disposal of storm runoff; and c) Provide recorded copy of any required easements to the Town. 50. TREE REMOVAL: Copies of all necessary tree removal permits shall be provided prior to issuance of a grading permit/building permit. 51. SURVEYING CONTROLS : Horizontal and vertical controls shall be set and certified by a licensed surveyor or registered civil engineer qualified to practice land surveying, for the following items: a. Retaining wall: top of wall elevations and locations. b. Toe and top of cut and fill slopes. 52. PAD CERTIFICATION: A letter from a licensed land surveyor shall be provided stating that the building foundation was constructed in accordance with the approved plans shall be provided subsequent to foundation construction and prior to construction on the structure. The pad certification shall address both vertica l and horizontal fo undation placement. 53. PRECONSTRUCTION MEETING: Prior to issuance of any permit or the commencement of any site work, the general contractor shall : a. Along with the project applicant, attend a pre-construction meeting with the Town Engineer to discuss the project conditions of approval, working hours, site maintenance and other construction matters; b. Acknowledge in writing that they have read and understand the project conditions of approval, and will make certain that all project sub-contractors have read and understand them prior to commencing work and that a copy of the project conditions of approval will be posted on site at all times during construction. 54 . RETAINING WALLS: A building permit, issued by the Building Department at 110 E. Main Street, may be required for site retaining walls. Walls are not reviewed or approved by the Engineering Division of Parks and Public Works during the grading permit plan review process. 55. CERTIFIFATE OF COMPLIANCE: A Certificate of compliance shall be recorded . Two copies of the legal description for each Jot configuration, a plat map (8-Y2 in. X 11 in.) shall be submitted to the Engineering Division of the Parks and Public Works Department for review and approval. The submittal shall include closure calculations, title reports less than 90 da ys old and the appropriate fee. The certificate shall be recorded before any permits may be issued. 56. CERTIFICATE OF LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT: A Certificate of Lot Line Adjustment shall be recorded . Two copies of the legal description for each new lot configuration, a plat map (8-'h in . X 11 in.) and two copies of the legal description of the land to be exchanged shall be submitted to the Engineering Division of the Parks and Public Works Department for review and approval. The submittal shall include closure calculations, title reports less than 90 days old and the appropriate fee. The certificate shall be recorded before any permits may be issued . 57. PARCEL MAP: A parcel map shall be recorded. Two copies of the parcel map shall be submitted to the Engineering Division of the Parks and Public Works Department for review and approval. Submittal shall include closure calculations, title reports and the appropriate fee. The map shall be recorded before any permits for new construction are issued. The Applicant/Subdivider shall provide the Engineering Division with an electronic copy (in PDF format) and two hardcopies of the signed recorded map along with a CAD drawing of the Parcel Map after it is recorded . 58. CC&Rs: The Applicant/Subdivider shall record CC&Rs at the time of recordation of the parcel subdivision map. These CC&Rs shall be subject to the review and approval of the Town prior to recordation of the parcel map . The owners of the three properties shall be responsible for the maintenance of all private utilities, wild land fire and buffer areas, storm water treatment facilities (including the three bioretention ponds,and bio-treatment swale) landscape areas, and other common areas/facilities within the proposed subdivision . The owners of the three properties shall be responsible for keeping the shared driveway signed, marked, free and clear for fire department access at all times. The property owner of Lot 3 shall keep Lot 3 's driveway apron signed, marked, free and clear for fire vehicle turnaround at al 1 times. 59 . WEST VALLEY SANITATION DISTRICT: All sewer connection and treatment plant capacity fees shall be paid either immediately prior to the recordation of any subdivision or tract maps with respect to the subject property or properties, or immediately prior to the issuance of a sewer connection permit, which ever event occurs first. Written confirmation of payment of these fees shall be provided prior to map recordation. 60. PRIVATE UTILITIES-STREET: Prior to the recordation of a subdivision map the Applicant/Subdivider shall place a note on the map, in a manner that meets the approval of the Town Engineer that states: "The private streets, utilities constructed within this map shall be owned , operated and maintained by the Developer, successors or assigns." 61. DEDlCATIONS: The following shall be dedicated on the parcel map by separate instrument. The dedication shall be recorded before any permits are issued: a. Union Avenue: A 25-foot right-of-way dedication b. Blossom Hill Road: A 15 -foot right-of-way dedication with a 36-foot radius at the intersection with the newly-dedicated right-of-way line of Union Avenue. c . A 3-foot wide sidewalk easement along Union A venue. d . A reciprocal Ingress & Egress Easement (ISE) by separate easement, recorded concurrently with the Parcel Map . e. Emergency Vehicle Access Easement: A 24-foot wide easement through Lots 1 thru 3, in addition to a 20-foot wide easement for turnaround , as shown on Lot 3. 62 . DEMOLITION: The existing building shall be demolished prior to recordation of the parcel map affected by this existing building. 63. SOILS REPORT: One copy of the soils and geologic report shall be submitted with the application. The soils report shall include specific criteria and standards governing site grading, drainage, pavement design, retaining wall design, and erosion control. The reports shall be signed and "wet stamped" by the engineer or geologist, in conformance with Section 6735 of the California Business and Professions Code. 64. SOILS REVlEW: Prior to issuance of any permit, the Applicant's engineers sha ll prepare and submit a design-level geotechnical/geological investigation for review and approval by the Town. The Applicant's soi ls engineer shall review the final grading and drainage plans to ensure that designs for foundations , retaining walls, site gradi ng, and site drainage are in accordance with their recommendations and the peer review comments. Approval of the Applicant's soils engineer shall then be conveyed to the Town either by letter or by signing the plans. 65. SOILS ENGINEER CONSTRUCTION OBSERVATION : During construction, all excavations and grading shall be inspected by the Applicant's soi ls engineer prior to pl acement of concrete and/or backfill so they can verify that the actual conditions are as anticipated in the design-level geotechnical report, and recommend appropriate changes in the recommendations contained in the report, if necessary. The results of the construction observation and testing shall be documented in an "as-built" letter/report prepared by the Applicant 's soils engineer and submitted to the Town before fina l release of any occupancy permit is granted. 66. SOIL RECOMMENDATIONS: The project shall incorporate the geotechnical /geo logical recommendations contained in the Geotechnical Investigation by Silicon Valley Soils Engineering, dated November 2014, and any subsequently required report or addendum . Subsequent reports or addendum are subject to peer review by the Town's consultant and costs shall be borne by the Applicant. 67. IMPROVEMENTS AGREEMENT: The Applicant shall enter into an agreement to construct public improvements that are part of th e development in a form acceptable to the Town in the amount of 100% (performance) and 100% (labor and materials) prior to issuance of any permit. The Applicant shall provi de two (2) copies of documents verifying the cost of the public improvements to the satisfaction of the Engineering Division of the Parks and Public Works Depa1tment. 68. JOINT TRENCH PLANS: Joint trench plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Town prior to recordation of a map. The joint trench plans shall include street and/or si te lighting and associated photornetrics. A letter shall be provided by PG&E stating that public street light billing will by Rule LS2A, and that private lights shall be metered with billing to the owners of the three properties . Pole numbers , assigned by PG&E, shall be clearly delineated on the plans. 69. WATER DESIGN : Water plans prepared by San Jose Water Company must be review ed and approved prior to issuance of any permit. 70. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS : The following improvements shall be installed by the Developer. Plans for those improvements shall be prepared by a California registered civil engineer, reviewed and approved by the Town, and guaranteed by contract, Faithful Performance Security and Labor & Materials Security before the issuance of a building permit or the recordation of a map. The improvements must be completed and accepted by the Town before a Certificate of Occupancy for any new building can be issued. a. Union A venue & Blossom Hill Road: curb , gutter, sidewalk, tie-in paving, signing, striping, storm drainage and sanitary sewers, street lights , traffic signal , intersection improvement, as required. b. Union A venue & Blossom Hill Road: an appropriate structural pavement section for the half-width immediately adjacent to the project frontage of both Union A venue and Blossom Hill Road shall be constructed to the centerline. 71 . FRONTAGE IMPROVEMENTS: The Applicant shall be required to improve the project 's public frontage to current Town Standards. These improvements may include but not limited to curb, gutter, sidewalk, driveway approaches, curb ramps, traffic signal , street lighting (upgrade and/or repaint) etc. The improvements must be completed and accepted by the Town before a Certificate of Occupancy for any new building can be issued . 72. FRONTAGE IMPROVEMENTS (STREET LIGHT): Remove existing street light on PG&E p ower pole and replace with a Town standard octaflute street light pole with LED light fixture. 73. FRONT AGE IMPROVEMENTS (TRAFFIC): The Appli cant shall construct and modify the Blossom Hill Road/Union Avenue intersection improvements as required including, and may not be limited to, curb, gutter, sidewalk, asphalt concrete pavement, pork chop island, median island, signs, striping, traffic signal poles, conduits, and equipment, etc., as directed by the Town Engineer. The improvements must be completed and accepted by the Town before a Certificate of Occupancy for any new building can be issued. 74. FRONTAGE IMPROVEMENTS (SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION): The Applicant shall upgrade existing traffic signal to current Town standards including, and may not be limited to , the following : a. Replace non-LED signals with LEDs b. Replace 8" signal heads with 12 " signal heads c . Install pedestrian signal countdown heads d. Install ADA compliant pedestrian push buttons e. Install two video detection cameras f. Install LED safety lighting fixture g. Install EMTRAC fire preemption device h. ADA-compliant pedestrian improvements including curb ramps and pork chop islands i. Others as applicable The improvements must be completed and accepted by the Town before a Certificate of Occupancy for any new building can be is sued. 75. ADA COMPLIANCE: The Applicant shall be required to meet all ADA standards, which must be completed and accepted by the Town before a Certificate of Occupancy for any new building can be issued. This may require additional construction measures as directed by the Town . 76. UTILITIES: The Developer shall install all new, relocated, or temporarily removed utility services, including telephone, electric power and all other communications Jines underground, as required by Town Code Section 27.50.015(b ). All new utility services shall be placed underground. Underground conduit shall be provided for cable television service. The Applicant is required to obtain approval of all proposed utility alignments from any and all utility service providers . The Town of Los Gatos does not approve or imply approval for final alignment or design of these facilities. The improvements must be completed and accepted by the Town before a Certificate of Occupancy for any new building can be issued. 77. UTILITY EASEMENTS: Deed restrictions shall be placed on Jots containing utility easements. The deed restrictions shall specify that no trees , fences , or hardscape are allowed within the easement boundaries, and that maintenance access must be provided. The Town will prepare the deed language and the Applicant's surveyor shall prepare the legal description and plat. The Applicant shall pay any recordation costs. 78. PRIVATE EASEMENTS. Agreements detailing rights, limitations, and responsibilities of involved parties shall accompany any proposed private easement. Access driveway shall be within the recorded access easement. New private access easement shall be recorded prior to issuance of building permit. The easement(s) and associated agreement(s) shall be recorded simultaneously with the Parcel Map. 79. TRENCHING MORATORIUM : Trenching within a newly paved street will be allowed subject to the following requirements: a. The Town standard 'T " trench detail shall be used. b. A Town approved colored controlled density backfill shall be used . c. All necessary utility trenches and related pavement cuts shall be consolidated to minimize the impacted area of the roadway. d. The total asphalt thickness shall be a minimum of 3-inches, meet Town standards, or shall match the existing thickness, whichever is greater. The final lift shall be 1.5- inches of half inch medium asphalt. The initial lift(s) shall be of three quarter inch medium asphalt. e. The Contractor shall schedule a pre-paving meeting with the Town Engineering Construction Inspector the day the paving is to take place. f. A slurry seal topping may be required by the construction inspector depending his assessment of the quality of the trench paving. If required, the slurry seal shall extend the full width of the street and shall extend 5-feet beyond the longitudinal limits of trenching. Slurry seal materials shall be approved by the Town Engineering Construction Inspector prior to placement. Black sand may be required in the slurry mix. All existing striping and pavement markings shall be replaced upon completion of slurry seal operations. All pavement restorations shall be completed and approved by the Inspector before occupancy. 80. SIDEWALK REP AIR: The Developer shall repair and replace to existing Town standards any sidewalk damaged now or during construction of this project. All new and existing adjacent infrastructure must meet current ADA standards. Sidewalk repair shall match existing color, texture and design, and shall be constructed per Town Standard Details . New concrete shall be free of stamps, logos , names , graffiti, etc. Any concrete identified that is displaying a stamp or equal shall be removed and replaced at the Contractor's sole expense and no additional compensation shall be allowed therefore. The limits of sidewalk repair will be determined by the Engineering Construction Inspector during the construction phase of the project. The improvements must be completed and accepted by the Town before a Certificate of Occupancy for any new building can be issued. 81. CURB AND GUTIER: The Developer shall repair and replace to existing Town standards any curb and gutter damaged now or during construction of this project. All new and existing adjacent infrastructure must meet Town standards. New curb and gutter shall be constructed per Town Standard Details. New concrete shall be free of stamps, logos , names, graffiti , etc. Any concrete identified that is displaying a stamp or equal shall be removed and replaced at the Contractor's sole expense and no additional compensation shall be allowed therefore. The limits of curb and gutter repair will be determined by the Engineering Construction Inspector during the construction phase of the project. The improvements must be completed and accepted by the Town before a Certificate of Occupancy for any new building can be issued. 82 . DRIVEWAY APPROACH: The Developer shall install one Town standard residential driveway approach at the project's vehicular point of entry along Union Avenue. The new driveway approach shall be constructed per Town Standard Plans and must be completed and accepted by the Town before a Certificate of Occupancy for any new building can be issued. New concrete shall be free of stamps, logos, names , graffiti , etc. Any concrete identified that is displaying a stamp or equal shall be removed and replaced at the Contractor 's sole expense and no additional compensation shall be allowed therefore. 83. CURB RAMPS: The Developer shall construct all curb ramps in compliance with ADA Standards which must be completed and accepted by the Town before a Certificate of Occupancy for any new building can be issued. New concrete shall be free of stamps, logos, names , graffiti , etc. Any concrete identified that is displaying a stamp or equal shall be removed and replaced at the Contractor's sole expense and no additional compensation shall be allowed therefore. 84. FENCING: Any fencing proposed within 200-feet of an intersection sha ll comply with Town Code Section §23 .10.080. 85 . SIGHT TRIANGLE AND TRAFFIC VIEW AREA: Any proposed improvements, including but not limiting to trees and hedges , shall abide by Town Code Section 23 .1 0.080, 26.10.065 , 29.40.030. 86. FENCES: Fences between all adjacent parcels shall be loc ated on the property lines/boundary lines. Any existing fences that encroach into the neighbor's property shall be removed and replaced to the correct location of the boundary lines before a Certificate of Occupancy for any new building can be issued. Waiver of this condition will require signed and notarized letters from all affected neighbors. 87 . TRAFFfC fMPROVEMENTS (OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENT): Off-site improvement plans shall be prepared by the Developer's design consultants and submitted to Town Engineer for approval prior to construction. The Applicant is required to designate necessary right of way for the required widening. The improvements must be completed and accepted by the Town before a Certificate of Occupancy for any new building can be issued. 88 . STREET LIGHTS AND TRAFFIC SIGNAL lNSPECTION FEES: The Developer shall pay for the Town's inspection of street lights and traffic signal related work installed by the developer. The fees, $2 ,000, shal l be due at time of building pennit application. 89. TRAFFIC STUDY: Any development of land use that generates greater traffic impacts than those assumed in the traffic study report may be required an updated traffic study in accordance with Town 's traffic impact policy. 90. TRAFFIC 1MP ACT MITIGATION FEE: The Developer shall pay the project's proportional share of transportation improvements needed to serve cumulative development within the Town of Los Gatos. The fee amount will be based upon the Town Council resolution in effect at the time the building permit is issued. The fee shall be paid before issuance of a building permit. The traffic impact mitigation fee for this project shall be calculated from the final plans using the rate schedule and current fee schedule in effect at the time the building permit is issued , using a trip generation rate based on a comparison of the site's current and proposed uses. 91. PRECONSTRUCTION PAVEMENT SURVEY: Prior to issuance of a Grading Permit, the project applicant shall complete a pavement condition survey documenting the extent of existing pavement defects using a 35-mm or digital video camera. The results shall be documented in a report and submitted to the Town for review. 92. POSTCONSTRUCTION PAVEMENT SURVEY: The project applicant will complete a pavement condition survey and pavement deflection analysis to determine whether road damage occurred as a result of project construction and whether there were changes in pavement strength. Rehabilitation improvements required to restore the pavement to pre- construction condition and strength shall be determined using State of California procedures for deflection analysis. The results shall be documented in a report and submitted to the Town for review and approval before a Certificate of Occupancy for any new building can be issued. The Applicant shall be responsible for completing any required road repairs prior to release of the faithful performance bond. 93. CONSTRUCTION STREET PARKING: No vehicle having a manufacture's rated gross vehicle weight exceeding ten thousand (10 ,000) pounds shall be allowed to park on the portion of a street which abuts property in a residential zone without prior to approval from the Town Engineer. 94. TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN: Traffic control plan is required and must be submitted and approved prior to issuance of any work in the public right-of-way. This plan shall include, but not be limited to, the following measures: a. Construction activities shall be strategically timed and coordinated to minimize traffic disruption for schools, residents, businesses, special events, and other projects in the area. The schools located on the haul route shall be contacted to help with the coordination of the trucking operation to minimize traffic disruption. b. Flag persons shall be placed at locations necessary to control one-way traffic flow. All flag persons shall have the capability of communicating with each other to coordinate the operation. c . Prior to construction, advance notification of all affected residents and emergency services shall be made regarding one-way operation, specifying dates and hours of operation. 95. TRAFFIC SIGNAL MODIFICATION PLAN: A Traffic Signal Modification Plan is required and must be submitted and approved prior to issuance of any work in the public right-of-way. This plan shall be prepared by a licensed traffic engineer. 96. HAULING OF SOIL: Hauling of soil on or off-site shall not occur during the morning or evening peak periods (between 7:00 a.m. and 9:00 a.m. and between 4:00 p.m . and 6:00 p.m.). Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the Developer shall work with the Town Building Department and Engineering Division Inspectors to devise a traffic control plan to ensure safe and efficient traffic flow under periods when soil is hauled on or off the project site. This may include, but is not limited to provisions for the Developer/Owner to place construction notification signs noting the dates and time of construction and hauling activities, or providing additional traffic control. Coordination with other significant projects in the area may also be required . Cover all trucks hauling soil, sand, and other loose debris. 97. CONSTRUCTION HOURS: All subdivision improvements and site improvements construction activities, including the delivery of construction materials, labors, heavy equipment, supplies, etc. shall be limited to the hours of 8:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m ., weekdays and 9:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. weekends and holidays . The Town may authorize on a case-by- case basis alternate construction hours. The Applicant/Subdivider shall provide written notice 24 hours in advance of modified construction hours . Approval of this request is at discretion of the Town. 98. CONSTRUCTION NOlSE: Between the hours of 8:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m ., weekdays and 9:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. weekends and holidays, construction, alteration or repair activities shall be allowed. No individual piece of equipment shall produce a noise level exceeding eighty-five (85) dBA at twenty-five (25) feet from the source. If the device is located within a structure on the property, th e measurement shall be made at distances as close to twenty-five (25) feet from the device as possible. The noise level at any point outside of the property plane shall not exceed eighty-five (85) dBA. 99 . CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT PLAN: Prior to the issuance of any permits, the Applicant shall submit a construction management plan that shall incorporate at a minimum the Earth Movement Plan, Traffic Control Plan, Project Schedule, site security fencing, employee parking, construction staging area, materials storage area(s), construction trailer(s), concrete washout{s) and proposed outhouse locations. 100. MA INT EN ANCE ACCESS: Prior to the issuance of any permits, the Applicant shall propose maintenance access improvements for the Town Engineer to review, comment on, and approve. The Engineering Division of the Parks and Public Works Department shall approve the surface materials over each public easement. 101. COMMON PRN ATE DRIVEWAY: The common private driveway accessing the Project Site s hall be kept open and in a safe, drive-able condition throughout construction and in perpetuity after construction has been completed. If temporary closure is needed, then fonnal written notice shall be provided at least one week in advance of closure. 102. WVSD (WEST VALLEY SANITATION DISTRICT): Sanitary Sewer Clean-out shall be installed for each property at the property line, or a location specified by the Town. 103. SANITARY SEWER BACKWATER VALVE: Drainage piping serving fixtures which have flood level rims less than twelve (12) inches (304.8 mm) above the elevation of the next upstream manhole and/or flushing inlet cover at the public or private sewer system serving such drainage piping shall be protected from backflow of sewage by installing an approved type backwater valve. Fixtures above such elevation shall not discharge through the backwater valve, unless first approved by the Building Official. The Town shall not incur any liability or responsibility for damage resulting from a sewer overflow where the property owner or other person has failed to install a backwater valve as defined in the Uniform Plumbing Code adopted by the Town and maintain such device in a functional operation condition. Evidence of West Sanitation District's decision on whether a backwater device is needed shall be provided prior to issuance of a building permit. 104. STORMW ATER MANAGEMENT: Construction activities including but not limited to clearing, stockpiling, grading or excavation of land, which disturbs 1 acre or more which are part of a larger common plan of development which disturbs less than 1 acre are required to obtain coverage under the construction general permit with the State Water Resources Control Board. The Applicant is required to provide proof of WDID# and keep a current copy of the storm water pollution prevention p lan (SWPPP) on the construction site and shall be made available to the Town of Los Gatos Engineering Division of the Parks and Public Works Department and/or Building Department upon request. 105. BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES (BMPs): The Applicant is responsible for ensuring that all contractors are aware of all storm water quality measures and that such measures are implemented. Best Management Practices (BMPs) shall be maintained and be placed for all areas that have been graded or disturbed and for all material, equipment and/or operations that need protection. Removal of BMPs (temporary removal during construction activities) shall be replaced at the end of each working day. Failure to comply with the construction BMP will result in the issu ance of correction notices, citations, or stop work orders . 106. STORMWATER DEVELOPMENT RUNOFF: All new development and redevelopment projects are subject to the Stormwater development runoff requirements. Every applicant shall submit a storm water contro l plan and implement conditions of approval that reduce storm water pollutant discharges through the construction, operation and maintenance of treatm ent measures and other appropriate source control and site design measures. Increases in runoff volume and flows shall be managed in accordance with the development runoff requirements in such a way that post-development flows meet or are below pre-development flows. 107 . SITE DESIGN MEASURES: All projects shall incorporate the following measures: a. Protect sensitive areas and minimize changes to the natural topography. b . Minimize impervious surface areas . c. Direct roof downspouts to vegetated areas. d . Use landscaping to treat stormwater. I 08. LANDSCAPING: In finalizing the landscape plan for the biotreatment area, it is recommended that the landscape architect ensure that the characteristics of the selected plants are similar to those of the plants listed for use in bioretention areas in Appendix D of the SCVURPPP C.3 Stormwater Handbook. 109. EROSION CONTROL: Interim and final erosion control plans shall be prepared and submitted to the Engineering Division of the Parks and Public Works Department. A Notice oflntent (NOi) and Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) shall be submitted to the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board for projects disturbing more than one acre . A maximum of two weeks is allowed between clearing of an area and stabilizing/building on an area if grading is allowed during the rainy season. Interim erosion control measures, to be carried out during construction and before installation of the final landscaping shall be included. Interim erosion control method shall include, but are not limited to: silt fences, fiber rolls (with locations and details), erosion control blankets, Town standard seeding specification, filter berms, check dams, retention basins, etc. Provide erosion control measures as needed to protect downstream water quality during winter months. The grading, drainage, erosion contro l plans and SWPPP shall be in compliance with applicable measures contained in the amended provisions C.3 and C.14 of most current Santa Cl ara CountyNPDES MRP Permit. Monitoring for erosion and sediment control is required and shall be performed by the QSD or QSP as required by the Construction General Permit. Stormwater samples are required for all discharge lo cations and projects may not exceed limits set forth by the Construction General Permit Numeric Action Levels and/or Numeric Effluent Levels . A Rain Event Action Plan is required when there is a 50% or greater forecast of rain within the 48 hours , by the National Weather Service or whenever rain is imminent. The QSD or QSP must print and save records of the precipitation forecast for the project location area from (http://www.srh .noaa.gov/forecast) and must accompany monito1ing reports and sampling test data. A Rain gauge is required on site. The Town of Los Gatos Engineering Division of the Parks and Public Works Department and the Building Department will conduct periodic NP DES inspections of the site throughout the recognized storm season to verify compliance with the Construction General Permit and Stormwater ordinances and regulations. 110. DUST CONTROL: Blowing dust shall be reduced by timing construction activities so that paving and building construction begin as soon as possible after completion of grading, and by land scaping disturbed soils as soon as possible. Further, water trucks shall be present and in use at the construction site. All portions of the site subject to blowing dust shall be watered as often as deemed necessary by the Town , or a minimum of three times daily, or apply (non-toxic) soi l stabilizers on all unpaved access roads , parking areas, and staging areas at construction sites in order to insure proper control of blowing dust for the duration of the project. Watering on public streets shall not occur. Streets shall be cleaned by street sweepers or by hand as often as deemed necessary by the Town Engineer, or at least once a day. Watering associated with on-site construction activity shall take place between the hours of 8 a .m . and 5 p .m . and shall include at least one late-afternoon watering to minimize the effects of blowing dust. All public streets soiled or littered due to this construction activity shall be cleaned and swept on a daily basis during the workweek to th e satisfaction of the Town. Demolition or earthwork activities shall be halted when wind speeds (instantaneous gusts) exceed 25 MPH . All trucks hauling soi l, sand, or other loose debris shall be covered . 111 . CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES: All construction shall conform to the latest requirements of the CASQA Stormwater Best Management Practices Handbooks for Construction Activities and New Development and Redevelopment, the ABAG Manual of Standards for Erosion & Sediment Control Measures, the Town's grading and erosion control ordinance, and other generally accepted engineering practices for erosion contro l as required by the Town Engineer when undertaking construction activities. 112 . SITE DRAINAGE: Rainwater leaders shall be discharged to splash blocks. No through curb drains will be allowed . Any storm dra in inlets (public or private) directly connected to publi c storm system shall be stenciled/signed with appropriate ''NO DUMPING -Flows to Bay" NPDES required language. On-site drainage systems for all projects shall include one of the alternatives included in section C.3.i of the Municipal Regional NPDES Permit. These include storm water reuse via cisterns or rain barrels, directing runoff from impervio us surfaces to vegetated areas and use of permeable surfaces. If dry wells are to be use d they shall be placed 1 O' minimum from adjacent property line and/or right-of-way. L 13 . STORM WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN: A storm water management plan shall be included with the grading pennit application for all Group I and Group 2 projects as defined in the amended provisions C.3 of the Municipal Regional Stormwater NPDES Permit, Order R2-2009-074. The plan shall delineate source control measures and BMP's together with the sizing calculations. The plan shall be certified by a professional pre- quali fied by the Town. In the event that storm water measures proposed on the Planning approval differ significantly from those certified on the Building/Grading Permit, the Town may require a modification of the Planning approval prior to release of the Building Permit. The Applicant may elect to have the Planning submittal certified to avoid this possibility. 114. STORM WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN NOTES: The following note shall be added to the storm water management plan: "The biotreatment soil mix used in all stormwater treatment landscapes shall comply with the specifications in Attachment L of the MRP . Proof of compliance shall be submitted by the contractor to the Town of Los Gatos 30 days prior to delivery of the material to the job site using the Biotreatment Soil Mix Supplier Certification Statement." 115 . STORM WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN CERTIFICATION: Certification from the biotreatment soils provider is required and shall be given to Engineering Division Inspection staff 30 days prior to delivery of the material to the job site. Additionally deliver tags from the soil mix shall also be provided to Engineering Division Inspection staff. Sample Certification can be found here: http://www.scvurppp-w2k.com/nd _ wp .shtml?zoom _ highlight=BIOTREA TMENT +SOIL 116. AGREEMENT FOR STORMWATER BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES fNSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE OBLIGATIONS: The owners of the three properties shall enter into an agreement with the Town for maintenance of the stormwater treatment facilities required to be installed on this project by Town 's Stormwater Discharge Permit and all current amendments or modifications. The agreement shall specify that certain routine maintenance shall be perfonned by the owners of the three properties and shall also specify facility maintenance reporting requirements. The agreement shall also specify routine inspection requirements , permits and payment of fees . The agreement shall be recorded prior to release of any occupancy permits. 11 7. SILT AND MUD IN PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY: It is the responsibility of contractor and home owner to make sure that all dirt tracked into the public right-of-way is cleaned up on a daily basis. Mud, silt, concrete and other construction debris SHALL NOT be washed into the Town 's storm drains . 118. GOOD HOUSEKEEPING : Good housekeeping practices shall be observed at all times during the course of construction. All construction shall be diligently supervised by a person or persons authori zed to do so at all times during working hours. The storing of goods and /or materials on the sidewalk and/or the street will not be allowed unless an encroachment permit is issued by the Engineering Division of the Parks and Public Works Department. The adjacent public right-of-way shall be kept clear of all job related dirt and debris at the end of the day. Dirt and debris shall not be washed into storm drainage facilities . The storing of goods and materials on the sidewalk and/or the street will not be allowed unless an encroachment permit is issued . The Developer's representative in charge shall be at the job site during all working hours . Failure to maintain the public right-of-wa y according to this condition may result in the Town performing the required maintenance at the Developer's expense. 119. NEIGHBORHOOD CONSTRUCTION COMMUNICATION PLAN : The Applicant shall initiate a weekly neighborhood e-mail notification program to provide project status updates. The e-mail notices shall also be posted on a bulletin board placed in a prominent location along the project perimeter. 120. PERMIT ISSUANCE : Pennits for each phase; reclamation, land scape , and grading, shall be issued simu ltaneously. 12 I . COVERED TRUCKS: All trucks transporting materials to and from the site shall be covered. 122 . FUTURE STUDIES : Any post project traffic or parking counts, or other studies imposed by Planning Commission or Town Council shall be funded by the Applicant. 123. SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT : The Applicant shall enter into an agreement to construct public improvements in accordance with Town Code Section 24.40.020. The Applicant shall supply suitable securities for all public improvements that are part of the de velopment in a form acceptable to the Town in the amount of 100% (performance) and 100% (labor and materials) prior to issuance of any permit. Applicant shall provide two (2) copies of documents verifying the cost of the public improvements to the satisfaction of the Engineering Division of the Parks and Public Works Department. 124 . UTILITY COMPANY REVIEW : Letters from the electric, telephone, cable, and trash companies indicating that the proposed improvements and easements are acceptable shall be provided prior to recordation of the parcel map. 125 . ABOVE GROUND UTILITIES: The Applicant shall submit a 75-percent progress printing to the Town for review of above ground utilities including backflow prevention devices , fire department connections, gas and water meters, off-street valve boxes, hydrants , site lighting, electrical/communication/cable boxes, transformers , and mail boxes. Above ground utilities shall be reviewed and approved by Community Development prior to issuance of any permit. 126. PRIVATE EASEMENTS: Agreements detailing rights, limitations, and responsibilities of involved parties shall accompany each private easement. The easements and associated agreements shall be recorded simultaneously with the parcel map . TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE SANT A CLARA COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT: 127 . WlLD LA N D-URBAN lNTERF ACE: This project is located within the designated Wildland-Urban Interface Fire Area . The building construction shall comply with the provisions of California Building Code (CBC) Chapter 7A. Note that vegetation clearance shall be in compliance with CBC Section 701A.3.2.4 prior to project final approval. Check with the Planning Department for related landscape plan requirements. 128. FIRE SPRINKLERS REQUIRED: An automatic residential fire s prinkler system shall be in stalled in one-and two-family dwellings as follows: In all new one-and two-family dwellings and in existing one-and two-family dwellings when additions are made that increase the building area to more than 3,600 square feet. Exception: A one-time addition to an existing building that does not total more than 1,000 square feet of building area. NOTE: The owner(s), occupant(s) and any contractor(s) or subcontractor(s) are responsible for consulting with the water purveyor of record in order to determine if any modification or upgrade of the existing water service is required . A State of Cal ifornia licensed (C-16) Fire Protection Contractor shall submit plans, calculations, a completed pennit application and appropriate fees to this department for review and approval prior to beginning their work. CRC Sec. 313.2 as adopted and amended by LGTC . 129 . CONSTRUCTION SITE FIRE SAFETY: All construction si tes must comply with applicable provisions of the CFC Chapter 33 and our Standard Detail and Specification SI- 7. Provide appropriate notations on subsequent plan submittals, as appropriate to the project. CFC Chapter 33 . 130 . ADDRESS IDENTIFICATION. New and existing buildings shall have approved address numbers, building numbers or approved building identification placed in a position that is plainl y legible and visible from the street or road fronting the property. These numbers shall contrast with their background. Address numbers shall be Arabic numbers or alphabetical letters. Numbers shall be a minimum of 4 inches (101.6 mm) high with a minimum stroke width of 0.5 inch (12 .7 mm). Where access is by means of a private road and the building cannot be viewed from the public way, a monument, pole or other sign or means shall be used to identify the structure. CFC Sec. 505 .1 131. FIRE DEPARTMENT ACCESS: The minimum clear width of fire department access roads shall be 20 feet. Modifications to the design or width of a fire access road , or additional access road(s) may be required when the fire code official determines that access to the site or a portion thereof may become compromised due to emergency operations or nearby natural or manmade hazards (flood prone areas, railway crossings, bridge failures, hazardous material-related incidents, etc. Refer to SCCFD SD&S A-1 and A-6 , available on our web site www .sccfd.org in the Fire Resources and Services Section, Fire Prevention CFC Chapter 5 .. 132. FIRE LANE MARKING: Detailed plans showing the location of the lanes may be required. Fire apparatus access roads, driveways and access ways shall not be marked as fire lanes without first obtaining Fire Department approval. Fire lanes shall be identified by red curb marking, signage or roadway surface marking as specified in our SD&S A-6. CFC Chapter 5. 133. D EEO RESTRICTION: Prior to the issuance of a building permit, a deed restriction shall be recorded by the applicant with the Santa Clara County Recorder's Office that requires that the owners of the three properties be responsible for keeping the shared driveway signed, marked, free and clear for fire department access at all times . The property owner of Lot 3 shall keep Lot 3 's driveway apron signed, marked, free and clear for fire vehicle turnaround at all times. N :\D EV\CONDITIONS \2 0 16\Union 15975.docx TOWN OF LOS GATOS 110 East M ain Street, Los Gatos, CA 95032 (408) 354-6874 SUMMARY OF DISCU SSION OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE CONCEPTUAL DEVELOPMENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE OF THE TOWN OF LOS GATOS FOR WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 13, 2014, HELD IN THE TOWN COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CIVIC CENTER, 110 EAST MAIN STREET, LOS GATOS, CA LIFORNIA. The meeting was called to order at 4 :30 p.m . ATTENDANCE Members Present: Absences: Staff Present: Applicant: ITEM I : Barbara Spector, Margaret Smith, Joanne Talesfore Marcia Jensen , Kendra Burch Laurel Prevetti, Assistant Town Manager/Community Developme nt Director Joel Paulson, Planning Manager Gary Kohlsaat, Architect 15975 Unio n A venue Conceptual Development Advisory Committee CD-14-001 Requesting review of conceptual plans for a Subdivision Application to subdivide one lot into three lots . APN 523-42-017 . PROPERTY OWNER: De Nardi Group APPLICANT: Gary Kohlsaat, Architect Comments: • Corridor lot concept is interesting. • Double frontage lots are a concern. • Orientation, street presence, site layout, compatibility, and fencing on Blossom Hill Road will need to be addressed. • The applicant is advised to work with th e neighbors. o Side loaded garages are preferred. • Loss of the vegetation on the northern portion of the property is a concern. o Shared access is a challenge. • Some Committee members prefer the Yi cul-de-sac option. • Concept B presents access challenges on Union Avenue given the typical backup of traffic from Blossom Hill Road. • Normally, the Town discourages flag lots, but Concept B is the least objectionable. • The Committee expressed concerns about driveways and access on Union A venue. • These will be challenging lots on challenging streets. ADJOURNMENT Meeting adjourned at 5: I 0 p.m. T he next regular meeting of th e Conceptual EXHIBIT 4 Conceptual Development Advisory Committee August 13 , 2014 Page 2 Prepared by: Development Advisory Committee is Wednesday, September I 0, 2014. This meeting has been cancelled and the October meeting is scheduled for Wednesday, October 8, 2014. -10/.Y !!~~~£~-- Joel Paulson, Planning Manager 'cc: Planning Commission Chair N'. ,[)l'V .C'OAC\M IN l.Tl'S'20 14\8-13-14 .doc 15975 UNION AVENUE (LOT 1) PROJECT DATA EXISTING PROPOSED CONDITIONS PROJECT Zoning district R-1:10 same Land use Single Family Residential Same General Plan Designation low density residential same Lot size: Square feeUacres 43, 103 sg !V.99 acres 12,941 sq IV.30 acres 3 Exterior materials: siding Wood Wood Lap Siding trim Wood Wood windows Wood Viny l Clad roofing Wood Shakes Composition Building floor area (sq. ft.): first floor 2, 180 sq ft 1,750 sq ft second floor 1,555 sq ft garage 600 sq ft 763 sq ft cellar Setbacks (ft.): front 70'-2" 37 .5' rear 95'-0" 31 '-2" side 6'-7" R 17'-6" side street 79 '-6" L 17-6" Maximum height (ft.) 27'-1 " Building coverage (%) 7.1% 19.4% Floor Area Ratio (%) house 5 .1% 25 .5% garage 1.4% 5.9% Parking 2 3 Tree Removals yes , all but one See Landscape Plan Sewer or septic Sewer Sewer REQUIRED/ PERMITTED - - - 10 ,000 sq. ft. min. -RECEl~ -•I ('\ i:;, t'\ 0 ,.,,,. v .._, • - T OWN OF LO~ -;..,, I !,:l\llNG 0 - - - - 25 feet minimum 20 feet minimum 10 feet minimum 15 feet minimum 30 feet maximum 40% maximum sq . ft. maximum sq. ft. maximum two spaces minimum canopy replacement - ED 016 GATOS V ISIO N lEXlllBIT 5 - 15975 UNION AVENUE (LOT 2) PROJECT DATA ----- EXISTING PROPOSED REQUIRED/ CONDITIONS PROJECT PERMITTED Zoning district R-1 :10 same - Land use Single Fa mi ly Residential Sa me - General Plan Designation low density reside ntial same . Lot size: Square feeUacres 43, 103 s9 fU .99 acres 11 ,35 1 sq fU.26 acres 10 ,000 s q . ft. min . 3 Exterior materials: siding Stucco - trim Wood - windows Vinyl Clad - roofing Concrete "S"-tile - Building floor area (sq. ft.): first floor 1,646 sq ft - second floor 1,701 sq ft - garage 736 sq ft - cellar . Setbacks (ft.): front 32' 25 feet minimum rear 17'·6" 20 feet minimum side L 14'-6" R 12'-0" 10 feet minimum side street 15 feet minimum Maximum height (ft.) 26'-9" 30 feet maximum Building coverage (%) 2 1% 40% maximum Floor Area Ratio (%) house 14.5 % sq. ft . maximum garage 6 .5% sq . ft. maximum Parking 3 two spaces minimum Tree Removals See Land scape Plan canopy replacement Sewer or septic Sewer - - 15975 UNION AVENUE (LOT 3) PROJECT DATA EXISTING PROPOSED REQUIRED/ CONDITIONS PROJECT PERMITTED Zoning district R-1 :10 same - Land use Single Fami ly Residential Same - General Plan Designation low dens ity residential same - Lot size: Square feeUacres 43 , 103 sg fU.99 acres 11 ,353 sq ft/.26 acres 10 ,000 sq. ft. min. 3 Exterior materials: siding Wood Lap Siding - trim Wood - windows Vinyl Clad - roofing Composition - Building floor area (sq. ft.): first floor 1,646 sq ft - second floor 1,722 sq ft - garage 736 sq ft - cellar - Setbacks (ft.): front 31 '-6" 25 feet minimum rear 27 '-6" 20 feet minimum side L=12 ', R=14'-6" 10 feet m inimu m side street 15 feet minimum Maximum height (ft.) 27'-8" 30 feet maximum Building coverage (%) 21% 40% maximum Floor Area Ratio (%) house 14.5% sq . ft. maximum garage 6.5% sq . ft. maximum Parking 3 two spaces minimum Tree Removals See Landscape Plan canopy replacement Sewer or septic Sewer - This Page Intentionally Left Blank ARC H IT ECT URE Development Review Committee Community Development Department, Town of Los Gatos 110 E . Main Street Los Gatos, CA 95030 Re: UNION AVENUE ESTATES, Proposed 3 Lot Subdivision 15975 Union Ave@ Blossom H ill Rd Members of the Committee: RECEIVED APR 1 0 2015 TOWN OF LOS GATOS PLANNING DIVISION April 9 , 2015 We are seeking approval for a proposed three lot subdivision in Northeast Los Gatos, located at the NW comer of Union Avenue and Blossom Hill Road . The property is zoned R-1 :10 and is just over of 43,000 square feet . Once the required street dedications are subtracted , the net lot area equals 35 ,645 sf. The three proposed parcels meet or exceed all of the minimum development standards . The property had been occupied by one family for many years , and is mostly overgrown with trees and shrubs . The house is not historical nor does it have any architectural value or merit. The overall average slope of the lot, prior to street dedications is 10.3%. The average slope of the net lot, after deducting 15 feet along Blossom Hill and 25 feet along Union Ave , is approximately 8%. Each individual lot will have average s lopes le ss than 10%. The properties on the South side of Blossom Hill are in the HiJl side zone and mostly hidden from the road. All of the adjacent properties that lie on the North side of Blossom Hill Road are zoned R :l -10 and have been subdivided and developed in variou s manners . The parcel immediately to the West was split into four and utilizes a shared, central access road from Blossom Hill . None of these homes have a real "presence" on the street , with a six foot tall redwood fence blocking most if not all of the facades . The subdivision to the rear (Lasuen Ct.) is a cul-de-sac design with ten large semi-custom homes . The property to the East, across Union Avenue (Leeward Ct.) is anoth e r cul-de-sac, divided into eight parcels with s imple but relatively uninspired homes . PROPOSED SUBD IVISION The proposed subdivision conforms to all of the development standards for new lots, including the added depth required (125 ft) for properties fronting a designated Arterial Route (Blossom Hill Road). Street dedication s of 25 feet on Union and 15 feet on Blossom Hil1 are included , which will provide a major upgrade to this intersecti on that will greatly benefit the general public . The added street width to Blossom Hill will conform with the neighbor's li ne , ~EXHIBIT 6 51 U niversity Ave nue, Suite L • Los Gat os, CA 95030 • 408.395-2555 UNION AVENUE ESTATES, LOS 1.:iATOS, CA PAGE 2 OF 5 completing the sidewalk and bike path, while providing extra parking and expanded vision for drivers. This portion of the original property is the only area with average slopes exceeding 10%. The Hillside Development Standards and Guidelines Checklist has been completed for all applicable items pertaining to this portion. All three parcels will have vehicular access via a twenty four foot wide shared ingress/egress easement along the Northerly property line, fronting onto Union Avenue. This approach came about as a direct result of the CDAC meetings and will eliminate dangerous access to Lots 2 and 3 from Blossom Hill road. This design concept is very logical on several levels, especially given the incline of Blossom Hill in relation to the proposed pad heights. The road also inclines after crossing Union Ave, and raises above the majority of the property. This situation makes for a less than desirable vehicular egress unless suitable on-site turnarounds can be fashioned without dominating the streetscapes. By placing the driveways in the rear, the amount of required grading is reduced significantly, as compared to the efforts needed to build up the driveways for direct access from Blossom Hill Rd. This road is so busy, it is hard to imagine how having a front door on Blossom Hill is desirable for a homebuyer. The South-facing orientation of the rear yards is better from a landscape/end user point of view . There is no reason the architecture can not be equally as attractive on the rear facade as on the front. And there is ample room for tree screening along the road. PROPOSED ARCHITECTURE The overall architectural concept for the project is to create a small enclave, drawing inspiration from iconic Los Gatos neighborhoods, where an eclectic mix of traditional styles blend harmoniously. As per our market research for the type of units desired by Los Gatos residents, the targeted buyers for these homes are families with young children. The diversity of styles adds interest and the appearance of a custom built community rather than a cookie cutter approach. Three of the most common and popular styles were chosen: Craftsman, Spanish and Traditional Hampton style. Each home will be two stories and have five bedrooms, four to five and one-half bathrooms and ample exterior entertaining areas. The proposed borne on the comer is oriented toward Union Avenue, with a three car garage to the side (accessed from the easement). This home is a two story Craftsman style, picked to create the sense that this home could have been an original orchard/ranch home . The Craftsman style is evident with horizontal siding, gabled roofs and typical details like tapered front porch columns, knee braces, stone accents and shingled gable ends. The window frames will be wood/ vinyl clad with grids, and will have wide flat trim. The front porch, with square columns and decorative railings , welcomes guests while providing added interest to the front facade. The style chosen for the middle property (Lot 2) is Spanish Mediterranean, with an off white stucco exterior, Stile roof and simple forms. The front porch provides cover for guests and is the focal point of the entry. The stair tower in the comer adds authentic detail and dark brown door and window frames provide for a real wood look . Wood corbels and support posts help to complete the home. UNION AVENUE ESTATES, LOS uATOS, CA PAGE 3 OF 5 And finally, the third property (Lot 3) will be done in a more traditional east coast (Hampton) style, with horizontal siding and prominent soffitted eaves. The blue-gray walls will be accented with white gridded windows, trim and detailing . The front porch has square painted columns and a hipped roof, which breaks up the two story facade . Subtle details Hke a trellis over the garage doors and shaped corbels fill out the exterior and add interest to this simple yet balanced exterior. FEATURES All three homes have been designed to focus the views to the front and rear yards , thus preserving privacy not only to adjacent neighbors but to each other, too. The pad elevations are such that these homes will be set low and not be imposing. All three homes are under the maximum FAR and also have greater than the minimum required setbacks , so they do not look crammed onto tiny lots. Sustainable , all -new landscaping will be planted strategically to not only provide appropriate shade and screening, but also for maximum livability. And all three homes are designed to have suitable roofs (uninterrupted, South facing) for instaJling ample solar panels. Since Blossom Hill Road is a heavily traveled route, six foot tall redwood fences are proposed along the new sidewalk . This will continue the existing pattern of the properties to the West while adding privacy and a security feature for the rear yards of the development. The fence will be stacked on top of the retaining walls that are necessary to support the new roadbed, using steel columns that will provide excellent and durable support. Several trees are proposed throughout the three lots to replace the ones removed . The access driveway will be screened along the north property line , and all of the perimeters are planted . Drought-tolerant shrubs and plants are specified for all publicly viewed landscaped areas. The entire length of the driveway will have permeable pavers over a stormwater infiltration area. CDAC MEETING & INPUT This project was heard by the Conceptual Development Advisory Committee on August 20, 2014. Three concepts were presented to the committee and all had both pros and cons . Solid feedback was provided, as well as a general consensus was reached that a fourth/hybrid solution would be the most desirable design. This concept calls for a shared i ngress and egress easement for all three homes to use from Union Avenue and is the one proposed with this application. Specifically, the proposed application addresses and responds to the following CDAC Comments as follows: l . Corridor Lot concept is interesting- • This is essentially how the project is designed, although they are technically not "corridor" lots , as these are generalJy not supported by the Town. 2. Double frontage lots are a concern- • Double frontage lot designs eliminated. 3 . Orientation , street presence , site layout , compatibility, and fencing on Blossom Hill Road will need to be addressed- . ' UNION AVENUE ESTATES, LOS uATOS, CA PAGE40F 5 • Since the proposed comer home is oriented in a conventional manner, only Lots 2 and 3 are "unconventional" in that the front facades do not face the street. However, this orientation mimics the adjacent parcels as well as several more along blossom Hill Rd. The elevation of the road in comparison to the houses diminishes their impact on the streetscapes, and the cedar privacy fences, which continue the established pattern, further reduce the street presence. The overall design will actually have more of the effect of one single family residence, as the other homes will not be highly visible . 4. The applicant is advised to work with the neighbors- • The neighbors to the north have been notified, and now that the Town's architectural peer review has come back positive , the designs will be shared with the remainder of the neighbors asap . 5. Side loaded garages are preferred- • All garages are side facing in relation to the entrance doors and access roads/drives. 6. Loss of vegetation on the northern portion of the property is a concern- • The northern portion of the lot is the only viable location for the access drive. Three trees-two pines and one buckeye are being removed, along with some privet hedges . The screening along this boundary will be replanted after grading and will provide more attractive and water conscious hedges that will be sustainably effective. Additionally, the layouts of the new homes present little infringement of privacy to the Northern neighbors, as the primary focus is towards Blossom Hill. 7. Shared access is a challenge- • The access driveway will be a shared easement for ingress and egress , but each property will own their portion of the easement. Each buyer will be aware of the situation prior to making any purchase. 8. Some committee members prefer the 112 cul-de-sac option- • Through many iterations it was determined that a cul-de-sac style would not allow for the creation of three conforming lots. 9. Concept B presents challenges on Union Avenue given the typical backup of traffic from Blossom Hill Road- • The access drive outlet is located at the farthest point away from Blossom Hill Road. With the new traffic configurations at this intersection as a result of this project, the traffic flow should be dramatically improved. 10. Normally, the Town discourages flag lots, but Concept B is the least objectionable- • The proposed configuration is a Hybrid, but technically not a series of flag lots. 11. The Committee expressed concerns about driveways and access on Union Avenue- • See response to #9 above 12 . These will be challenging lots on challenging streets- • Agreed! This is a challenging project but with a lot of hard work, the design team has put forth an excellent project, with three well designed homes on legal, conforming lots. Vehicular access has been grouped and located in the least problematic location . CONCLUSION The comer of Blossom Hill Road and Union Avenue is one of the gateways into Town. Union Estates converts an overgrown , derelict property into a small community that will have the look and feel of Los Gatos . The architecturally designed homes will compliment each other and UNION AVENUE ESTATES . LOS l>ATOS, CA PAGE 5 OF 5 provide an attractive enclave that neither speaks too loud nor is too diminutive for this comer. Along with the added street improvements, this development is a win -win for all. Sincerely, Gary Koh aat Architect C19245 This Page Intentionally Left Blank ARCHITECTURE Development Review Committee Community Development Department, Town of Los Gatos 110 E. Main Street Los Gatos, CA 95030 Re: UNION AVENUE ESTATES , Proposed 3 Lot Subdivision 15975 Union Ave @ Blossom Hill Rd Erin Walters: M-1~-~l s-t?--~•\ -...~,-...--"'." ... -~ L-~..;....,-:, ... ..=_, NOV 2 4 20 15 TOWN OF LOS GATOS PLANNING DIVISION November 23 , 2015 The following is a summary of changes/alterations and activities that have taken place on the above referenced project since the last DRC meeting held August 4 , 2105. OnJy the major items have been listed here. A response list of engineering revisions was submitted along with the revised plans . ENGINEERING/C.3 DRAINAGE: The plans and C.3 drainage calculations presented on Aug 4 had been approved by the previous Town engineer as well the consultant in charge of C.3 review . The project civil engineer had worked closely with both in order to adhere to their desires. However, site data produced by consulting engineer Fletcher Parsons contradicted the design parameters which required us to completely start over with our whole drainage strategies . And it was apparent by the overwhelming concerns brought forth by the downhill neighbors that stormwater is of the utmost priority to be addressed. Our revised civil sheets omit the previous infiltration areas and now depict bio-swales to treat runoff and then allow it to overflow into the storm system. All roof, patio and driveway rainfall will be directed into a series of bio-s wales along the shared driveway, on the south side. Note : One potential design that utilized the 4 foot wide strip of land between the driveways and the north fence was nixed in favor of providing landscape screening; unfortunately, very few plants are suitable for planting in a bio-swale. The C.3 calculations have been revised, submitted and are now approved . BUILDING PAD ELEVATIONS/SITE RETAINING WALLS: More overhaul to the site plan was requested by both the Planning and Engineering departments to reduce the proposed retaining wall along the north driveway/property line . It should be noted that the original engineering comments asked for a reduction in overall site grading and suggested we raise the building pads, which consequently required this retaining wall along the North Property line. We met with Joel Paulson and Mike Weisz to review 3 options, and they agreed that Option 2 sufficiently addresses their concerns. We have reduced the retaining wa ll by an average of2'-3" (27") a.long the entire length. EXHIBIT 7 51 University Avenue, Suite L • Los Gatos, CA 95030 • 408.395-2555 UNION AVENUE ESTATES , LOS GATOS, CA PAGE 2 OF3 This reduction in the site retaining wall was achieved by several methods, one of which was to lower the finish floors of the homes on Lot 1 (11"), Lot 2 (19 1/2") and Lot 3 (24''). Additional grading was done in the rear yards which happened to increase the south retaining walJs along Blossom Hill, done under the Town's observation . The front home on Union (Lot I) was moved to the South by 24" and the two interior homes (Lots 2 & 3) were also moved to the South by 28". ARCHITECTURE: The roof pitch of the middle house (Lot 2) was reduced from 5: 12 to 4 : 12, resulting in a net reduction of 15" at the highest ridgeline (second floor roof). Additionally, the roof over the garage was changed from a gable end that faced the northerly neighbor to a shed roof sloping up to the second floor to further reduce bu lk on this end . NEIGHBORHOOD SITE MEETING: On the evening of Oct 21, we held a neighborhood meeting to review the revised drainage and architectural plans. Al1 of the immediate neighbors were invited and most showed up . Attending were Joni and Gideon Gimlan, Jan Murray and Peter Costigen, Susanne Belshe, Orv Blessing, Tom Manzgawu and Jazmin Jonson . Ian Camey and Tim Cronin represented the ownership group, and Amanda Wilson from Hanna Brunetti CiviJ Engineers along with myself represented the design team. We displayed the revised drainage plan, a traffic plan for the Union and Blossom Hill intersection, expanded site cross sections through each Lot, and an architectural exhibit depicting the proposed buiJding pads as they sit in relation to the existing grades. We provided background of the previous process , then introduced the new drainage concepts to the group. We explained that the story poles did not reflect these latest changes. We then tried to answer as many questions as possible , both in the group setting and individuaJiy as well. We estimate that 90% of the neighbors concerns centered around site drainage and runoff. Amanda Wilson described the new scheme. The revamped design essentially stops all storm water from flowing across the Northerly property line. The first lines of defense is the new curb and gutter to be installed on Blossom Hill Road, capturing a serious amount of surface water that now flows onto the site . Then, the two stepped retaining walJ s along Blossom hill will act as a giant french drain to collect and reroute subsurface water that also historically ran onto the property (and beyond?). The new bioswale system will that the site collected water, treat it and then direct it the storm water system instead of the previous design, which encouraged infiltration . And finally, the last Line of defense is the North site retaining waJJ, which will again catch subsurface water before it migrates downhill to the neighbors' yards . The other concerns were about the height of the homes, particularly the middle home on Lot 2 . Jan Murray and Peter Costigen live directly behind Lot 2 and were the most vocal in their concern of privacy and loss of mountain views. Using the building pad drawings, we explained bow onJy a portion of the proposed house was to be above the current grade . The home has 10 foot high plates on the first floor (the industry UNION AVENUE ESTATES , LOS GATOS , CA PAGE 30F3 standard) and 9 ' -6" plate heights on the second floor , with the exception two gabled rooms that face the side and rear yard s so they don 't come into play. Even though we are planning for 10 foot plates, the majority of the ceilings will be dropped with soffits to 9 feet (from the finished floor) in order to accommodate the heating and air conditioning duct work. This ductwork is normally run under the house , but the high water table has dictated the use of concrete slab floors instead of a raised floor system . HVAC ducting is extremely difficult and problematic to run through the concrete slabs , so this is non-negotiable. We also pointed to the cross sections that show the distance between the two homes to equal to 89 feet (from the second story over the garage) and a full 110 feet to the second floor over the living room . With the amount of existing landscape screening and the proposed screening on the North border, we feel that the screening is more than adequate . This , of course, is simply our professional opinion, based on our experience , and is not meant to be offensive to Jan and Peter, so we hope they don't take this too personally. We agreed to adjust the story poles of Lot 2 to better represent the new proposed house, showing how the entire house was lowered by 19", plus the reduced roof pitch also lowered the overall height and mass by an additional 8-15". We have agreed to provide her with a set of the plans . The new poles are scheduled to be reset for all three homesites in early December. Jan was also concerned about the amount of shading on her property from the new homes . Based on the updated shadow studies , the only time the the homes cast shadows is in the middle of winter during the early morning and late afternoon hours . These shadow studies were created with our 3D software, without any trees taken into consideration , and are highly accurate. SUM MARY: Captured rainwater will no longer recharge the water table and will be directed off site after being "treated ". The houses have been lowered 1-2 feet and moved away from the houses to the North by 28". The retaining wall along the North line has been reduced by 2-3 feet in height . And on Lot 2 , the roof has been lowered by an additional 15". The architectural plans have been updated to include these changes , including new building elevations, locations , streetscapes and shadow studfos. Additionally, a sheet including three cross sections cut through each house , from Blossom Hill to Lasuen a has been included in the set. Please consider these revisions and efforts when analyzing this application , and let us know if you'd any further information or explanations . With Regards, Gary Koh at Architect C19245 E nclosures: Site Graphic of House Pads on Existing Grades This Page Intentionally Left Blank Tree Inventory, Assessment, and Protection Plan 15975 Union Avenue Los Gatos, CA 95032 Prepared for: Carney Construction Consulting, Inc. January 5, 2015 Prepared By: Richard Gessner ASCA -Registered Consulting Arborist ® #496 ISA -Board Certified Master A rborist® WE-43418 /SA -Tree Risk Assessor Qualified ©Copyright Mon arc h Consulting Arborists LLC , 2015 RECEIVED FEB 1O2015 TOWN OF LOS GATOS PLANNING DIVISION EXlllBIT 8 15975 Union Av enue Tree Invento ry, Assessment. and Prot ec tion Plan Janu ary 5 , 2015 Tabl e of Conte nts Table of Contents .................................................................................................... 1 Summary ................................................................................................................ 1 Background ............................................................................................................. 1 Assignment ............................................................................................................. 1 Limits of the assignment ......................................................................................... 1 Purpose and use of t he report ................................................................................ 2 Observations ........................................................................................................... 2 Discussion .............................................................................................................. 3 Tree Inventory ......................................................................................................... 3 Cond ition Rating ..................................................................................................... 5 Suitabil ity for Preservation ...................................................................................... 6 Influence Level. ....................................................................................................... 7 Tree Protection ....................................................................................................... 8 Critical Root Zone ................................................................................................... 9 Conclusion ............................................................................................................ 1 o Recommendations ................................................................................................ 1 O Bibliography .......................................................................................................... 11 G lossary of Terms ................................................................................................. 12 Appendix A : Tree Inventory Map ........................................................................... 13 Append ix B : Tree Inventory Table ......................................................................... 14 Appendix C : Photographs ..................................................................................... 21 C1 : Site From Union Avenue ................................................................................ 21 C2 : Neighbor 's Redwoods .................................................................................... 22 C3 : Site Interior ..................................................................................................... 23 C4: Lean ing Coast Live Oaks ............................................................................... 24 C5 : Privets ............................................................................................................ 25 Append ix D : Tree protection specifications ........................................................... 26 Pre -Const ruction Meeti ng w ith the Project Arborist .............................................. 26 Tree Protection Zones and Fence Specifications ................................................. 26 Monitoring ............................................................................................................. 26 Restrict ions Within the Tree Protection Zone ....................................................... 26 Monarch Co nsulting Arborists LLC -P.O Box 1010, Felton , CA 95018 831 .331 .898 2 -ric k@ mona rch a rborist.com Page 1 of 2 15975 Un ion Avenue Tree In ven tory, Assessment, and Protection Plan January 5, 2015 Root Pruning ......................................................................................................... 27 Boring or Tunneling ............................................................................................... 27 Timing ................................................................................................................... 27 Tree Pruning and Removal Operations ................................................................ 27 Tree Protection Signs ........................................................................................... 27 Appendix E: Tree Protection Signs ....................................................................... 28 E1: English ............................................................................................................ 28 E2: Spanish .......................................................................................................... 29 Qualifications, Assumptions , and Limiting Conditions .......................................... 30 Certification of Performance ........ : ........................................................................ 31 Monarch Consulting Arborists LLC -P.O Box 1010, Felton , CA 95018 831.331 .8982 -rick@monarcharborist.com Page 2 of 2 15975 Union Avenue Tree Inventory, Assessment, and Protection Plan January 5 , 2015 Summary The property is located on the northwest corner of Union Avenue and Blossom Hill Road and contains 112 trees comprised of 39 different species . Sixty-nine (69) trees have trunk diameters less than twelve inches and two of those are coast live oaks (Querc us agrifolia). Forty-tlu·ee (43) trees have trunk diameters twelve inches or greater and consist primarily of the conifers on site and some coast live oaks. Seventy trees were considered to be in fair overall condition. Two trees are dead and thirty-one are in poor condition . Nine trees are in good condition including the neighbor 's coast redwoods and several of the deodar cedars. Most of trees within the project area are not suitable for retention under a development setting. Although many trees are in fair condition most of the species or individuals would not be compatible with another use for the site. Six trees have good suitability including two on the neighboring property. Twelve trees have fair suitability and the remaining ninety-four are poorly suited for retention. Approximately 100 trees will be highly affected by the project and require removal. Trees located along the north property boundary and on the neighbor 's property will be moderately influenced and some tree protection will be required . The grading of the site and the improvements to extend the sidewalk around to Blossom Hill Road will all require significant tree removal to accommodate the development. The neighbor 's coast redwoods will need to have their root zones protected at a distance of five times their bunk diameters to avoid unnecessary damage. Background Camey Construction Consulting, Inc. asked me to assess the site, trees , proposed footprint plan, and to provide a report with my findings and recommendations to help satisfy the Town of Los Gatos planning requirements. Assignment 1. Provide an arborist 's report that includes an assessment of the trees within the project area. The assessment is to include the species, size (trunk diameter), condition (health and structure), and suitability for preservation ratings . 2. Provide tree protection specifications and influence ratings for the trees that will be influenced by the project. Tree protection will be placed on a provided map if necessary. Limits of the assignment 1. No tree risk assessments were performed. 2 . The infonnation in this report is limited to the condition of the trees during my inspection on December 10 , 2014. 3 . The plans reviewed for this assignment were as follows: Sheet A-2 dated 12/12/2014 provided by Kohlsaat & Associates. No grading, drainage, utility plan or landscape plan was reviewed. Monarch Consulting Arborists LLC -P.O Box 1010, Felton, CA 95018 831 .331.8982 -rick@monarcharborist.com Page 1 of 31 15975 Union Avenue Tree Inventory, Assessment, and Protection Plan January 5 , 2015 Purpose and use of the report The report is intended to identify all the trees within the plan area that could be affected by a project. The report is to be used by Camey Construction Consulting, Inc ., their agents , and the Town of Los Gatos as a reference for existing tree conditions to help satisfy the Town of Los Gatos planning requirements. Observations The property is located on the northwest comer of Blossom Hill Road and Union Avenue in Los Gatos (Image 1). There is a residence and detached garage located near Union Avenue. All the vegetation on the property is overgrown and has not been maintained and the lot is vacant. There are several volunteer privets (Ligu s trum luc idum) growing throughout the property along with several other species of trees. Many trees along Blossom Hill have been topped to accommodate the high voltage lines and there are two dead Monterey pines (Pinus radiata) near the southwest corner. There is one large double stem coast redwood (Sequoia semperv ire ns) and two leaning coast live oaks (Appendix C). Along the north boundary are three coast redwoods on the neighbor 's property and two are close to the fence. Throughout the site there are several mature deodar cedar ( Cedrus deodara) and some eastern black walnut (Jug/ans nigra). Image 1: Site overview. Courtesy of Google Maps 2015. Monarch Consulting Arborists LLC -P.O Box 1010, Felton, CA 95018 831 .331 .8982 -rick@monarcharborist.com Page 2 of 31 15975 Union Avenue Tree Inventory, Assessment , and Protection Plan January 5, 2015 Discussion Tree Inventory The tree inventory consists of trees protected by the Town of Los Gatos that are located on the site and those in close proximity on neighboring properties. The Town of Los Gatos protects all trees with a trunk diameter greater than (4) four inches at (36) thirty six inches above grade on vacant or underdeveloped lots (Appendix A and B). All trunk diameters were measured with a standard tape measure. Heights and crown radii are estimates. Aluminum tree tags have been affixed to all trees and neighboring trees have tags on the fence . The site and adjacent properties contain 112 trees comprised of 39 different species (Chart 1 ). Most of the trees are invasive volunteers as evidenced by the quantity of privets on site. There are several other invasive species as well including silk oak, black acacia, black walnut, silver acacia, Catalina cherry to name a few. The table below lists the average trunk diameters, heights, and crown crown radii (Table 1 ). Table 1: Average Trunk Diameter, Height, Crown Radii Trunk Diameter Height Crown Radii 11 inches 15 feet 8 feet Sixty-nine trees have trunk diameters less than twelve inches and two of those are coast live oaks. The majority of these small trees are privets or fruit trees and most are concentrated around the perimeter near Blossom Hill Road. Forty-three trees have trunk diameters twelve inches or greater and consist primarily of the conifers on site and some coast live oaks. Monarch Consulting Arborists LLC -P.O Box 1010, Felton, CA 95018 831 .33 1.8982 -rick@monarcharborist.com Page 3 of 31 15975 Union Avenue Tree Inventory, Assessment, and Protect ion Plan January 5, 2015 The chart b e low lists the sp ecies and quantity of trees within the project area (Chart 1) Chart 1 : Species Distribution Aleppo pine (Pinus halapensis) Apple (Malus domestica) Black acacia (Acacia melanoxylon) California buckeye (Aesculus californlca) Canary Island pine (Pinus canariensis) Carob (Ceratonia siliqua) Catalina cherry (Prunus ilicifolia) Cherry (Prunus serrata) Chinese elm (Ulmus parvifolia) I Coast live oak (Quercus agrifolia) Coast redwood (Sequoia sempervirens) Crape myrtle (Lagerstroemia indica) Deodar cedar (Cedrus deodara) Eastern black walnut (Juglans nigra) Elm (Ulmus americana) English walnut (Juglans regia) Giant sequoia (Sequoiadendron g iganteum) Holly oak (Quercus ilex) Hollywood juniper (Juniperus chinensis 'Torulosa' Lemon (Citrus limon) Loquat (Eriobotrya japonica) Madrone (Arbutus menziesii) Mcnterey p ine (Pinus radiata) Mulberry (Morus alba) Pear (Pyrus communis) Pittosporum (Pittosporum eugenoides) Plum (Prunus sp.) Podocarpus (Podocarpus macrophyllus) Privet (Ugustrum lucidum) Pyracantha (Pyracantha angustlfolia) Shamel ash (Fraxinus uhdei) Silk oak (Grevillea robusta) Silk tree (Albizia julibrissin) Silver acacia (Acacia dealbata) Silver dollar eucalyptus (Eucalyptus polyanthemos) Southern magnolia (Magnolia grandiflora) Stone pine (Pinus p ines) Tristania (Tristania lorina) Willow (Salix babylonica) 6 ..--.13 12 18 Monarch Consulting Arborists LLC -P.O Box 1010, Felton , CA 95018 831 .331 .8982 -rick@monarcharborist.com 24 30 Page 4 of 31 15975 Union Avenue Tree Inventory, Assessment, and Protection Pla n January 5, 2015 Condition Rating A tree's condition is a detennination of its overall health and structure based on five aspects : Roots, trunk, scaffold branches, twigs, and foliage . The assessment considered both the health and structure of the trees for a combined condjtion rating. The crown , trunk , trunk flare, and above ground roots were inspected from the ground. • Exceptional = Good health and structure with significant size, location or quality. • Good =No apparent problems, good structure an d health , good longevity for the site . • Fair= Minor problems, at least one structural defect or health concern, problems can be mitigated through cultural practices such as pruning or a plant health care program. • Poor = Major problems with multiple structural defects or declining health , not a good candidate for retention . • Dead/Unstable= Extreme problems, irreversible decline, failing s tructure , or dead. The majority of trees were cons idered to be in fair overall condition with some problems. Two trees are dead and thirty-one are in poor condition. Nine trees are in good condition including the neighbor 's coast redwoods and several of the deodar cedars around the site. The chart below list the condition ratings and the relative quantity of each category (Chart 2). Good Fair Poor 0 14 Chart 2: Condition Rating • Quantity 28 42 56 70 Monarch Consulting Arborists LLC -P.O Bo x 1010, Felton , CA 95018 831.331.8982 -rick@monarcharborist.com Page 5 of 31 15975 Union Avenue Tree Inventory, Assessment, and Protection Plan January 5 , 2015 Suitability for Preservation A tree's suitability for preservation is determined based on its health, structure, age , species characteristics, and longevity using a scale of good, fair, or poor. The following list defines the rating scale (Tree Care Industry Association, 20 l 2): • Good =Trees with good health, structural stability and longevity. • Fair = Trees with fair health and/or structural defects that may be mitigated through treatment. These trees require more intense management and monitoring, and may have shorter life spans than those in the good category. • Poor= Trees in poor health with significant structural defects that cannot be mitigated and will co ntinue to decline regardless of treatment. The species or individual may possess characteristics that are incompatible or undesirable in landscape settings or unsuited for the intended use of the site. The majority of trees within the project area are not suitable for retentio n under a development setting. Although many trees are in fair condition most of the species or individual trees would not be compatible with another use for the site. Many trees are invasive volunteers and most have not been managed in any routine manner and have been left to grow wild . Six trees have good suitability including two on the neighboring property. Twelve trees have fair suitability and the remaining ninety-four are poorly suited for retention. The chart below list the condition ratings and the relative quantity of each category (Chart 3). Good Fair Poor 0 Chart 3: Suitability for Preservation Quantity 25 50 75 100 Monarch Consulting Arborists LLC -P.O Box 1010, Felton, CA 95018 831 .331.8982 -rick@ monarcharborist.com Page 6 of 31 15975 Un ion Avenue Tree Inventory, Assessment , and Protection Plan January 5 , 2015 Influence Level lnfluence level defines how a tree may be influenced by construction activity and proximity to the tree , and is described as low, moderate, or high . The following scale defines the impact rating : • Low = The constmction activity wiU have Little influence on the tree. • Moderate = The construction may cause future health or structural problems, and steps must be taken to protect the tree to reduce future problems. • High= Tree structure and health will be compromised and removal is recommended, or other actions mus t be taken for the tree to r emain. The tree is located in the building envelope . Based on the site plan provided, the topography of the property, and my discussions with the architect and civil engineer most of the trees will be highly affected by the project and require removal. Trees located along the north property boundary and on the neighbor's property will be moderately affected and some tree protection will be required. The grading of the site and the site improvements to extend the sidewalk around to Blossom Hill Road will all require tree removal to accommodate the improv ements. The chart below lists the trees and the development influence rating (Chart 4). 0 High Moderate Low 20 Influence Rating Quantity 40 60 80 100 Monarch Consulting Arborists LLC • P.O Box 1010, Felton , CA 95018 831 .331 .8982 • rick@monarcharborist.com Page 7 of 31 15975 Union Avenue Tree Inventory, Assessment, and Protection Plan January 5, 2015 Tree Protection Tree protection focuses on protecting trees from damage to the roots , trunk , or scaffold branches from heavy equipment (Appendix D). The tree protection zone (TPZ) is the defined area in which certain activities are prohibited to minimize potential injury to the tree. The TPZ can be d etermined by a formula based on species tolerance, tree age, and diameter at breast height (DBH) (Matheny, N. and Clark, J. 1998) or as the drip line in some instances. The tree protection zones for this project should simply be located at the tree drip line distances. For this project I would require fence at the drip line, primarily because the trees are small or at the property boundary where they would only be influenced on one side (Figure 1 ). Preventing mechanical damage to the main stems from equipment or hand tools can be accomplished by wrapping the main stem with straw wattle (Figure 2). The wattle will create a porous barrier around the trunk and prevent damage to the bark and vascular tissues underneath. Trees that are to be moderately affected by the project without adequate fence protection should be wrapped in wattle. Strew Wittie Wrap trunks with stl'llW w.ttle up to 6 feet Sturdy TPZ Fencing 6 ft. high Figure 1: Tree protection distances Figure 2: Trunk protection with straw wattle Monarch Consulting Arborists LLC -P.O Box 1010, Felton , CA 95018 831 .331 .8982 -rick@monarcharborist.com Page 8 of 31 15975 Union Avenue Tree Inventory, Assessment, and Protection Plan January 5, 2015 Critical Root Zone Because the trees will only be influenced on one side the CRZ will in effect be the TPZ for this project. The critical root zone (CRZ) is the area of soil around the trunk of a tree where roots are located that provide stability and uptake of water and nutrients required for the tree's survival. The CRZ is the minimum distance from the trunk that trenching or root cutting can occur and will be defined by the trunk diameter as a distance of three times the DBH in feet, and preferably, five times (Smiley, E.T., Fraedrich, B. and Hendrickson, N. 2007). For example if the tree is two feet in diameter, the minimum CRZ distance would be six to ten feet from the stern on one side of the tree . Because the neighbor 's redwoods trees are close to the proposed driveway I would recommend at lear a five time the trunk diameter distance be honored or the trees may be damaged. Minimum 3x Ill! :,ii Critical Root Zone (CRZ) = 3 to 5 times the trunk diameter on one side i 4 Preferred i 5x Ill! Jtii Figure 3: The image above depicts the preferred Critical Root Zone distance. Monarch Consulting Ar borists LLC -P.O Box 1010, Felton, CA 95018 831 .331.8982 -rick@monarcharborist.com Page 9 of 31 15975 Union A venue Tree Inventory, Assessment, and Protection Plan January 5 , 2015 Conclusion The tree inventory consists of trees protected by the Town of Los Gatos that are located on the site and those in close proximity on neighboring properties . The site and adjacent properties contain 112 trees comprised of 39 different species . Most of the trees are invasive volunteers with little or no maintenance . Sixty-nine (69) trees have trunk diameters less than twelve inches and two of those are coast Jive oaks. The majority of these small trees are privets or fruit trees and most are concentrated around the perimeter near Blossom Hill Road. Forty-three ( 43) trees have trunk diameters twel v e inches or greater and consist primarily of the conifers on site and some coast live oaks. The majority of trees were considered to be in fair overall condition with some problems. Two trees are dead and thirty-one are in poor condition. Nine trees are in good condition including the neighbor's coast redwoods and several of the deodar cedars around the site. Most of trees within the project area are not suitable for retention under a development setting. Although many trees are in fair condition most of the species or individuals would not be compatible with another use for the site. Six trees have good suitabili ty including two on the neighboring property. Twelve trees have fair suitability and the remaining ninety-four are poorly suited for retention. Most of the trees will be highly affected by the project and require removal, approximately 100 trees . Trees located a long the north property boundary and on the neighbor's property will be moderately affected and some tree protection will be required. The grading of the site and the improvements to extend the sidewalk around to Blossom Hill Road will all require significant tree removal to accommodate the development. The neighbor 's coast redwoods will need to have their root z ones protected at a distance of five times their trunk diameters to avoid unnecessary damage. Recommendations I. Obtain all necessary pennits from the Town of Los Gatos prior to removing or significantly altering any tree. 2 . Refer to Appendix D of this document for general protection guidelines and specifications. 3 . Protect the neighbor 's trees by not allowing encroachment into their critical root zones. Monarch Consulting Arborists LLC -P.O Box 1010, Felton, CA 95018 831 .331.8982 -rick @monarcharborist.com Page 10 of 31 15975 Union Avenue Tr ee Inventory, Assessment , and Protection Plan January 5, 2015 Bibliography American National Standard for Tree Care Operations: Tree, Shrub and Other Woody Plant Management : Standard Practices (Management of Trees and Shrubs During Site Planning, Site Development, and Construction)(Part 5). Londondeny, NH: Secretariat, Tree Care Industry Association, 2012. Print. ISA. Glossary of Arboricultural Terms. Champaign: International Society of Arboriculture, 2011. Print. Matheny, Nelda P. Trees and development: A technical guide to preservation of trees during land development. Bedminster, PA: International Society of Arboriculture, 1998. Smiley, E. Thomas, Fraedrich, Bruce R., and Hendrickson, Neil. Tree Risk Manage ment. 2nd ed. Charlotte, NC: Bartlett Tree Research Laboratories, 2007 Monarch Consulting Arborists LLC -P.O Box 1010, Felton, CA 95018 831 .331 .8982 -rick@monarcharborist.com Page 11 of 31 15975 Union Avenue Tree In ventory, Assessment, and Protection Plan January 5 , 2015 Glossary of Terms Defect: An imperfection, weakness, or lack of something neces sary. In trees defect s are injuries, growth patterns, decay, or other conditions that reduce the tree's structural strength . Diameter at breast height (DBH): Measures at 1.4 meters (4 .5 feet) above ground in the United States, Australia (arboriculture), New Zealand, and when using the Guide for Plant Appraisal, 9th edition; at 1.3 meters ( 4.3 feet) above ground in Australia (forestry), Canada, the European Union, and in UK forestry ; and at 1.5 meters (5 feet) above ground in UK arboriculture. Drip Line: Imaginary line defined by the branch spread or a single plant or group of plants. Mechanical damage: Physical damage caused by outside forces such as cutting, chopping or any mechanized device that may strike the tree trunk, roots or branches. Scaffold branches: Permanent or structural branches that for the scaffold architecture or structure of a tree. Straw wattle: also known as straw wonns, bio-logs, straw noodles, or straw tubes are man made cylinders of compressed, weed free straw (wheat or rice), 8 to 12 inches in diameter and 20 to 25 feet long . They are encased in jute, nylon, or other photo degradable materials, and have an average weight of 35 pounds . Tree Protection Zone (TPZ): Defined area within which certain activities are prohibited or restricted to prevent or minimize potential injury to designated trees , especially during construction or development. Tree Risk Assessment: Process of evaluating what unexpected things could happen , how likely it is, and what the likely outcomes are. In tree management, the systematic process to determine the level of risk posed by a tree, tree part, or group of trees . Trunk: Stem of a tree. Volunteer: A tree, not planted by human hands, that begins to grow on res id ential or commercial property. Unlike trees that are brought in and installed on property, volunteer trees usually spting up on their own from seeds placed onto the ground by natural causes or accidental transport by people. Normally, volunteer trees are considered weeds and removed, but many desirable and attractive specimens have gone on to become pennanent residents on many public and private ground s. This Glossary of tenns was adapted from the Glossary of Arboricultural Tenns (ISA, 2011). Monarch Consulting Arborists LLC -P.O Box 1010 , Felton , CA 95018 831.331 .8982 -rick@monarcharborist.com Page 12 of 31 ~.)7 .. --, ... , "297.83< 1'61'b4 r ___ r ) > ) s a9 ·49·2r vi, ·-rn ; ··-:!! ' • >< ' ., ,_A.._ existing~ f.f. 294.44 2'l3.0J .,--...... -..._ .... ·- --- ) ) 'I 'ho u s e ,1"" * UTE J I > ~ .I ex is ting ) ~0·6,.\.-PORCH COR .-'·;:..!·;.;._r_·05_..,.._>-:t-=;t --79J.~ f.(i'i!f4.J7 porch \ 294.5-0 > 2.94.54 ' ...,..._..._ ________ .,... _______ ~~="------: > ' ~9·t03 .I_.._ ~ \ ..,,--,,,r-~ "'°"'"-b r i > k b rJ c ~ '-• '. JJ .,~1;-\, ·----------',----, ~4 .10 _,.J .. "'t -~ 1.--4' .. ,,. ~ - _,../ ------· ~~ ( ... 29.l.71 :m.85 CA--------------------•"°"· .. ----"' 29 jl6 planter ~l82 .. ,..2~•.l6 •• L--'----' --29., __ _ r-1 ,7:23 \..:jlo-2s RD \'oll 1111 SlB ' :,, •r -- 3.44 --- GAS 2 6 29 E§ 29 ·°" T AC 29 BB AC ~ .. >. 0 -·-c 0 !'t " ~ ", ( --<" < ( < ( ,..I r \{ --- I 4~1:9 9 c 193.B< ____ o ::::l >~ -~-.. _ Cb 296 ~ c ---Cb ---i -........ --... __ • 299.39 I qi los got s ------~ 132 o.r. 6 5 ~~fre N89 '48 __ l 306 7 ' ce.f' ··----l 247.80 -------->-. e T\6:25 .-· ·----------l W .e BO\ -l -----·--'1---~\0 ' 30688 ----. ___ , ', -.-' rr 302.12 ----+--------------..... -... _,.. -------1°s -------._f!OD___ / -·-------·---~'1-1.ZQ~t -·--Jo•.Ja ~~-~ Ac - J\3.7S 311 .59 ) 309.1 2 . IJ' ~'I EP ' ' ...... -, ' _., ,_r""""-,...,.. 8 I o· lls09 s 0 J1 H , (W'\ lwl ' ( \ r . ~,. . I ' . I I . Jos•.'-,R 0 a IW\ d 30;.33 EP • J0•.95 303.35 l03.07 lO:l.1 0· ==-> 302.69 ' J03.0 2.79 ( :o;} TSB~rn I < JOJ. - --------'--------1~-----..;_,,.------~l03-..21wl011~3-.00------+--r-----(W) 15975 Union A ven ue Tre e Inventory, Assessm ent , and Protec ti o n Pl an January 5 , 201 5 Appendix B: Tr ee Inven tory Tab le Table 2 : Tree Inventory I Tree Species # Trunk -Height -Crown Condition Suitability Influence Level Diameter Radius 1 Coast live oak · 1646 i I (Que re us agrifolia) Privet (Ligustrum l 1647 i , lucidum) I 12 I 4 i Privet (Ligustrum I 1648 . 4 lucidum) , J_ --------------- 4 1 Privet ( Ligustrum • /ucidum) . 1649 ~-------------+-- . Privet (Ligustrum I 1650 4 , ! lucidum) ' -------,--·--' 1 Canary Island pine : 1651 16 I (Pinus canariensis) -------------- ! Aleppo pine (Pinus [ 1652 i 25 1 ' 25 ! 10 Fair 15 6 Fair 15 6 ' Fair ' -------- 15 -,-- 15 45 I I 45 6 ·Poor I 6 Poor I 10 I Good 10 '. Fair for Preservation i Fair l Poor 1 Poor I High I High High ------------ Poor High Poor High , __ _ ! Good I I High --1---L- I Poor 1 High I I I · halapensis) : : 1 -___________ __i_ ____ -1 _ ___j ____ ,_ ---_1 --~-----------1 I I 6 , Good Good , California buckeye · 1653 ' 6 I : (Aesculus ' 1 ca lifornica) , I '---------~--.!_------ 10 I I I _j__ ___ -'-----...--- Moderate ' Privet (Ligustrum 1654 8 1 ; luci~_um) ___ · ______ t- . Privet (Ligustrum I 1655 8 , 15 6 ' Fair , Poor -.--------'---- 15 6 Fair Poor 'Moderate ---l ------. l Moderate 'lucidum) I : P-r-iv~t-(Ligus~~m--~~-6-56-~ ---8-1 ~ ------------ --I ----' I _lu_ci~u_m~-. --: I -10 rl -18 : ... -.6;ir -. L ~' ---~-Moder~!~ : ! ;~_:~~~f,i:'!_ __ '_ 16_5: i _ -! __ : I -~LF ~i~---_; F:i: _ _e•rat~ Podocarpus 1658 6 1 1 15 6 i Fair I Fair Moderate 1 (Podocarpus macrophyllus) ! Podocarpus i (Podocarpus macrophyllus) Podocarpus (Podocarpus ; macrophyllus) ' 1659 ! -.,-· -r-. I 1660 -----,--- 6 --,- 8 15 15 6 1 Fair 1 I Fair I Moderate ----------l 6 Fa ir Fa ir Moderate I _l - Monarch Consulting Arborists LLC -P.O Box 1010, Felton , CA 95018 831 .3 3 1.8982 -ri c k@monarcharborist.com Pag e 14 of 31 15975 Union Ave nue Tree In ventory, A ssessment, and Protection Pla n January 5 , 2015 i Tree Species # Trunk Diameter -Height -Crown Radius Condition Suitability Influence Level I Podocarpus (Podocarpus . macrophyllus) I 1661 -----· --- Coast redwood (Sequoia sempervirens) r --- ; Coast redwood (Sequoia sempervirens) Lemon (Citrus limon) 1 1662 1-- . 1663 ! 1664 : I -.------------··-!----- 6 : --- 24 ----- 4 ' I 15 45 - I I I I 45 I I I I -·- 10 35 I · Holly oak ( Quercus i 1665 , 9 And 9 · ilex) I r-- Deodar cedar • 1666 ( Cedrus deodara) ' \---- ---·--,----- I Mulberry (Marus I 1667 : : alba) ! -------------·-+--. Shamel ash ' 1668 , (Fraxinus uhde1) I----- , Mulberry (Marus • alba) , Eastern black 1 walnut (Jug/ans nigra) +--- I 1669 I -~ ---- 1 1670 1 I , I i ---.. . ---T---- Privet (Ugustrum . 1671 1 , /ucidum) J_ 16 45 I --~ -- 11 I 25 I I I --;-01--3-5; I ! I 10 I 20 • I 14 i---25 6 Poor 10 Good 10 1 Good -I 5 Poor 8 Fair 10 j Good 5 Poor 8 : Poo r 6 Poor ' ------I 8 ! Poor 5 Good I ; _______ ---1----------..... -----+-----__ ...... ____ - 1 Eastern black walnut (Jug/ans · nigra) , 1672 ~------ - -. ----.;--------,-- Coast redwood l 1673 : 16, 14, 1 (Sequoia I 10 , 4 sempervirens) 1 ------~-- Eastern black walnut (Jug/ans : nigra) ' Giant sequoia ( Sequoiadendron giganteum) ' ; 1674 ' 14 I 25 ' 10 I Poor I ' I I I I --1---45___., ! I 1 O Fair ' I 1 25 I 8 Poor I I ---·-J_ 25 I 8 ' Poor I ------ ' for Preservation Fair Good -4---- 1 Good I 1 Poor Poor , Good I ! Moderate Moderate Moderate I -- ---- High I I High ---- Moderate ---·---+------. Poor I High ' i .L_.. __ _j 1 Poor High l Poor High I ------ : Poor ! High 1 Poor I H igh I I ---------~---~ Poor , High -"i --~-----+ - I Poor , High i Poor 'High l -I Poor I High l -..J i _____ , Monarch Consulting Arborists LLC -P.O Box 1010, Fe lton , CA 95018 831.331.8982 -rick @monarcharborist.com Page 15 of 31 1597 5 Union Av enue Tree In ventory, Assessm en t , and Protect io n Plan January 5, 2015 [ Tree Species # Trunk -Height -Crown Condition Suitability Influence Level i Diameter Rad ius for Preservation · Monterey pine ( Pinus radiata) I 1676 10 I 35 1 8 Dead ·Poor High Monterey pine (Pinus radiata) . -~ -------1 -------------- 1677 18, 18 ' 45 15 ! Poor Poor I High I I ' ~·--:--j----- J ____ _ ------+---· ----_J __ _ Eastern black 1 walnut (Jug/ans i n igra) 1--- 1 Privet (Ligustrum 'lucidum) Monterey p ine (Pinus radiata) 1678 1679 ' 1680 I ---·--f ---- Coast live oak · 1681 1 I (?:_uercus agr!!_ol~a~-·--- Privet (Ligustrum j 1682 : 1 lucidum) 1 1 ! Privet (Ligustrum 1683 !-- i lucidum) 1-·--- Eastern black I walnut (Jug/ans nigra) I ------ Privet (Ligustrum lucidum) I _I 1684 ' I 1685 I I I - -i 1686 1 18 ' 8 19 12 6 1 6 1 24 6 6 35 1 O ; Fair Poor 25 8 Fair Poor I ---------I 35 I 10 Dead 1 Poor ---,----~--- 25 : 10 Fa ir 1 Fair -------------I 15 J 6 I Fa ir 'Poor -·------. -----1--- 15 6 ' Fair j Poor --4 30 I I 25 I I I --- 25 1 12 Fair 6 Fair I -..J 6 Fair 1 Po or Poor Poor High -·t High ·High High I I H igh I ---; I High __ l ----- I High I High I Pri~; (Ligu~tru,;, ! lucidum) --_L ____ --.,. ---------1·----___ __! ---- . Privet (Ligustrum ! lucidum) ~--·------ Privet (Ligustrum lucidum) Silk tree (Albizia julibrissin) f ------ Deodar cedar ( Cedrus deodara ) 1687 l I ---1 ---· I 1688 I . ---- i : 1689 1 I I I 1590 I .._____ --------1-- 1 Catalina cher ry 1691 1 (Prunus ilici fo/ia) ----· -_ __,,_ __ _ Privet (Ligustrum lucidum) 1692 10 I 6 7 1 4 25 i 6 ' Fair , Poor , High I ---+------+--- 25 1 6 ! Fair I 20 1 20 I I -8 ! F~i~ i 6 Good ' , Poor I I I , Poor , Poor --'------' I High I -: i High '·--- High I • I ------,--------~-------- 4 10 5 1 Fair Poor High I I ------t---------t------ 10 20 8 Fair Poor High -------_! Monarc h Consulting Arborists LLC -P.O Box 1010, Felton , CA 95018 831 .331 .8982 -ri ck @monarcharborist.com Pa ge 16 of 31 15975 Union Avenue Tr ee Inventory, Assessment, and Protection Plan January 5, 2015 Tree Species # Trunk -Height -Crown Condition Suitability Influence Diameter Radius for Level Coast live oak ' 1693 1 4 ( Ouercus agrifolia) 1 Eastern black walnut (Jug/ans : nigra) 1---------- Privet (Ligustrum lucidum) ' Privet (Ligustrum lucid um) . Privet (Ligustrum · lucidum) I Privet (Ligustrum 'lucidum) 1694 22 ' ---·· ____ __)_ . ' I : 1695 I 8 I '1696 8 ' ' ' ·-------I 1697 i 8 1 I ~ 1698 8 , ' Preservation 10 I I 6 : Poor Poor I High I --,-------l------------ 30 10 1 Poor 'Poor : High I I I ----i---------------~ ---· 15 · 6 Fair 1 Poor I High J 15 : 6 Fair Poor I High _ _L I ' ! Hi~~ --~---.---- 15 I 6 ' Fair Poor I I I I -_I --I I Poor 1 High 15 6 Fair I I ~ I 1699 ' ~~--I ---.---- , Madrone (Arbutus [ menziesil) _ __ __ · Coast live oak I ( Ouercus agrifolia) i Pr~ve; (-Zigust;~m : lucidum) . Privet (Ligustrum i /ucidum) ' · Silk oak ( Grevillea . robusta) ' I ; __ -.. -~ - ' 1700 i I 14 ' ' 1701 ! 16 I -J '1702 10 I 16 I -. --1----- ' ' I ' 25 1 I 1 35 I I ~5 1 ___ L __ 25 I 6 J Fair I I ---,--- 10 I Fair -+-·-· 12 ' Fair ' I I 10 Fair 10 I Poor -i------~ -------- 1 Poor I -,_ --... - Fair I 'Poor Poor ; Poor _J_~~--: I High I High I -_,. [High I High ' 9 1 20 8 ' Fair Fair 1 High -17 -r-. -2 ~---1~0 I Po-;;,--fpo~r -------~~-h--· I Coast live oak 1704 , , ( Quercus agrifolia) , , r------------1---- I : Privet ( Ligustrum 8 ! 20 I -----~ I F ~i-r -: Poor --~ H ~h -1 lucidum) . , 1 ! I D-eod~r ~;dar -; ~~oi ; --4 : ;5 ; -- -;·1G~~d -r-;~o~ 1 ·~i~h ; Silk oak ( Grevillea 1705 1 1 . robusta) 1 --------_[._ .. I I : 1706 : l:i_ce_d_ru_s_d~_o_d_ar._a) -~---~-------i -· _ -L---~-------,.-------J_ ______ _ Coast live oak : 1708 i 5 · 20 I 6 : Fair I Poor J High (Quercus agrifolia) _ l_ ______ , __ I , , C oast live oak 1709 ; 12 __ 2_5_1 ___ 8 i. Fair ---~Poor_ -.,]'. _Hi~h_-_-~~-J ' ( Quercus agrifolia) ; i . _ ~~~~~e-(-Pt~u~----~;~f-24 30 ' 8 ! Poor ·Poor I High · 1 halapensis) , ' ----------_J Monarch Consulting Arborists LLC -P.O Box 1010, Felton, CA 95018 831 .331 .8982 -rick@monarcharborist.com Page 17 of 31 15975 Union Avenue Tree Inventory, Assessment, and Protection Plan January 5, 2015 ! Tree Species # Trunk -Height -Crown Condition Suitability Influence Level l Diameter Radius for Coast live oak 1 ( Quercus agrifolia) Coast live oak ( Quercus agrifolia) . Chinese elm ; ( Ulmus parvifolia) Catalina cherry (Prunus ilicifolia) Privet (Ligustrum 1 lucidum) ~----- ' Privet (Ligustrum lucidum) Privet (Ligustrum I tucidum) Eastern black 1 walnut (Jug/ans : nigra) Pittosporum (Pittosporum ~fl:~oidesj__ , Pear (Pyrus communis) I -- ' ' Privet (Ligustrum 1 lucidum) ; Holly oak ( Quercus 1 i/ex) r=------ i Coast redwood l (Sequoia sempervirens) 1711 : 4 : 20 : 5 Fair I -----4----------_i -- 1712 2 20 5 1 Fair ---r---------1------I I I 1713 20 15 10 1 Poor I ! 1714 I 8 15 1 8 1Fair -·--,-i 1715 I 8 1 I I ' 1716 I ---[ 8 L ------+--- I 1717 : 8 : 15 ! . +--------- 1718 22 I 25 1 I I I 1719 10 I . 1120 I 4 1 10 I ___ J __ 20 I 6 j Fair 6 i Fair _]_ 6 l Fair 10 Poor I I I 10 Poor i I -~-- 5 j Poor l 6 1 Fair '. 112~-----;: ----;~ ---6-tlFai;- , 1723 1 2~,J;~--,---~5 +-1--15 . 1 1 Fair I I 10 6 I I I I I ~--------1 ----_J_ . Coast live oak 1724 • 20 ! 35 j 20 I Fair ( Quercus agrifolia) I I ----------- - ---!___ - Preservation Poor ! High I ---+------ Poor High ·------,--- Poor High Poor l High I I Poor --------, I High I ·Poor I High . ---------~ --1 Poor 1 High I I -------I 1 Poor i High Poor Poor 1 Poor I I High I High I --i---- I High -+--- Poor I High -_______ l ___ _ Poor i High I I I Poor ! High I 1 Coast live oak 1725 i 16, 16 30 I 15 I Fair 1 Poor : High , ( Quercus agrifolia) • 1 I 1 ' ' i , Poor C-------------=---i----------------:·--------------··-4-----~ ! Privet (Ligustrum ~ 1726 1 12 1 20 l 10 ' Fair Poor I High 1 lucidum) I l ! r-------____ ____._ __ ·------.-------.-- Pittosporum 1727 I 12 ! 20 I 1 O I Poor ( Pittosporum : j eugenoides) -------------_____J__ -·-------------------- ___ _j__ __ - I High I Monarch Consulting Arborists LLC -P.O Box 1010 , Felton, CA 95018 831 .331 .8982 -rick@monarcharborist.com Page 18 of 31 15975 Union Aven ue Tree Inventory, Assessment, and Protection Plan January 5, 2015 r --. # Trunk -Height -Crown Condition Suitability Influence Diameter Radius for Level t Tree Species l Preservation Privet (Ligustrum lucidum) ; Southern magnolia (Magnolia grandiflora) ' Pyracantha 1 (Pyracantha angustifolia) ! 1728 12 ' ________ .J ___ - 1729 2 I ! ·---: -------~-- 1730 : 6 20 I 10 i Fair , Poor ---f----------r------·:-------- 8 I 4 Poor : Poor I I __ .J ___ _ 8 6 : Poor Poor _____ ,. ..... ---i ------·-·r----~------ 'Elm (Ulmus ' 1731 19 1 40 j 10 I Poor ! High -----r------. j High ---1--------~ i High !"High : americana) , I ' L ' ;..__-------------~---------t··-·----· -l-------\ ----·~-+-------~-~--·~-~--·· ---·-·-·--~--·----~ Deodar cedar 1 1732 i 20 ·1 45 · 1 O : Poor Poor ' High ' , I ' , ( Cedrus deodara) ! 1 ;·----~•• ---•-.w-- --~ • •• -+ -----•• •-•• --~--+ --~ -----;··------ Deodar cedar ' 1733 i 14 · 45 . 12 : Fair Fair [High i I (Ce.dru:__~~o_~~~a~ --'----f--_ _ __ ~------:--___ ._.;. _____________________________ -f---·--------= 1 Deodar cedar : 1734 t 18 ; 45 I 12 Fair Fair : High ( Cedrus deodara) . i 1 ·-S-;-o~e -~ine-(Pfn~s-·-~73~t-. -----36 ___ ---~5 j ·----1~1 F;; ----: P~;------~~igh --~ 1 pinea) i j I I-·-----------· ---. ---__ , ___ ----+-·--·-. -· --·· ···--·--------------· 1 Coast live oak ! 1736 i 4 10 l 5 ! Fair Poor 1 High -~Q_~er~~s ~€'.i!~~a) _ J_ --·· ________ _j_____ _ _____ _ ___ J_ ---·--·------'. ; Apple (Matus ' 1737 j 4 i 1 O j 5 ; Poor : Poor , 1 ' High , domestica) ; 1 , J r·------------, ---. ,. ·--------------~-----------------.. ---· -;----· ·- . English walnut : 1738 i 10 ! 25 1 10 '. Poor ; Poor I High , (Jug/ans regia) 1 I t------------····-·· ·------1-· -------T--------~-------~--------i-----------1 ;1um_(Prunus !~·2._ '. -~~3.~~ _______ 2 _; _____ 1_? L_ __ ~_Poo! _____ :!~~-___ 1_~!~!1__ ___ _ ; Coast live oak · 1740 1 8 J 10 I 6 l Fair Poor ! High : ( Quercus agrifolia) j ' · I 1 I..-~--------·-·;-----r----____ ; ---·----!-·------j -------1-------:.......--------, Silver acacia : 17 41 1 30 1 25 1 8 I Poor ' Poor I High · ~!..~:~1!.._de~tba_~!_ ~--_ L ______ L_ ___ +--------J _________ .___ !... _________ .,_ ; Willow (~a/ix 1742 j 8 i 20 I 6 l Fair ' Poor i High 1 , babylomca) ~ '. ! I ; i 1-·-----·--·---;-----+-----:·------------1-------t--···------!-----·--. 'Hollywood juniper ; 1743 i 8 ' 20 i 8 ! Fair ; Poor i High '. (Juniperus : I ' L_ j' ' ! chinensis 'Torulosa' ' J , : f---------'--· ----'---·-------' -----_j_ ______ , _______ _.,...._ ' ' I ' I : Hollywood juniper ; 1744 ! 10 : 20 ! 8 1 Fair 1 (Juniperus · chinensis 'Torulosa' i L ------··-··-·----·-'.. ··--1 - 1 Poor • .I.---· -----·-·- ' I .. ----_j_ Monarch Consulting Arborists LLC -P.O Box 1010, Felton, CA 95018 831 .331 .8982 -rick@monarcharborist.com i High Page 19 of 31 15975 Union A ve nue Tr ee Invento ry, A ssessment, and P ro te ctio n Plan January 5, 201 5 Tree Species # Trunk Diameter -Height -Crown Radius Condition Suitability Influence Level : Cherry (Prunus ! serrata) Crape myrtle , (Lagerstroemia : 1745 : ! 1746 I j I indica) --------'--j I ' I 1747 I ' Deodar cedar 1 ( Cedrus deodara) 1 Privet (Ligustrum 1748 1 /ucidum) ; Southern -~;g~o~ia j 17~~ l - (Magnolia l ~randifl~~~ __ J _ _ l _ Carob ( Ceratonia I 1750 i 1 siliqua) ~--------------- I Tristania (Tristania 1 1751 l [~~n~---_ i ___ l Black acacia (Acacia melanoxylon) I _____ --- 1 1 Black acacia 1 (Acacia 1 melanoxylon) j Silver dollar 1 eucalyptus 1 (Eucalyptus 1 polyanthemos) ! I ' 1752 ' I 1753 j I I : 1754 i 14 , 22 I I i I English walnut ' 1755 ' 2 5 ~ Fair I ---·-- 4 10 5 Fa ir l I for Preservation : Poor i High I I --- Poor High ' ------------- 22 45 12 Good Good High 6 , I 6 I 20 I I ~ ---~--- 20 ' I I I 61 Fair .__L__ 6 1 Poor 10 1 ~·1-10 ·:-Fair - I I --------+---~- 4 10 , 5 1 Fair 4 18 ' I ' : I __)_ --J .• --- 20 I 5 : Fair I 35 1 I _l 35 ! I I I I -+ 20 i I -~ --- 10 I Fair I I 121 Fai r Poor ,-- Poor -1· I High I -, ---I ---; .. - Poor 1 Poor Poor ; Poor ,~~gh -- 1 I _L __ Poor I High I Poor 1 High [~Jug/ans regia) I : Hollywood j uniper , -175 ~ I ·--:----1 8 20 I -81 .. F~r --i---6; Fair 1 Poor ' (Juniperus · I chinensis 'Torulosa ' I ' I t 1 Loquat (Eriobotrya I 1757 1 ---~ ---__ J_ __ --- 20 \ 10 I Fair ---r----- 10 Fair ! ja~onica~ ; _ [ L _i_ __ - Monarch Consulting Arborists LLC -P.O Bo x 1010, Felton , CA 95018 831.331 .8982 -rick @monarc harborist.com i High I _J__ -- Page 20 of 31 15975 Union Avenue Tree Inventory, Assessment, and Protection Plan Appendix C: Photographs C1: Site From Union Avenue Monarch Consulting Arborists LLC -P.0 Box 1010, Felton , CA 95018 831.331 .8982 -rick@monarcharborist.com January 5, 2015 Page 21 of 31 15975 Union Avenue Tree Inventory, Assessment, and Protection Plan C2: Neighbor's Redwoods Monarch Consulting Arborists LLC -P.O Box 1010, Felton, CA 95018 831 .331 .8982 -rick@monarcharborist.com January 5, 2015 Page 22 of 31 15975 Union Avenue Tree Inventory, Assessment , and Protection Plan C3: Site Interior Monarch Consulting Arborists LLC -P.O Box 1010, Felton, CA 95018 831 .331.8982 -rick @monarcharborist.com January 5, 2015 Page 23 of 31 15975 Union Avenue Tree Inventory, Assessment , and Protection Plan C4: Leaning Coast Live Oaks Monarch Consulting Arborists LLC -P.O Box 1010, Felton , CA 95018 831.331 .8982 -rick@monarcharborist.com January 5, 2015 Page 24 of 31 15975 Union Avenue Tree Inve ntory, Assessme nt , and Protection Plan CS: Privets Monarch Consulting Arborists LLC -P.O Box 1010 , Felton , CA 95018 831 .331.8982 -rick @monarcharborist.com January 5, 2015 Page 25 of 31 15975 Union Avenue Tree Inventory, Assessment , and Protection Plan January 5, 2015 Appendix D: Tree protection specifications Tree protection locations should be marked before any fencing contractor arrives . Pre-Construction Meeting with the Project Arborist Prior to beginning work, all contractors involved with the project should attend a pre construction meeting with the project arborist to review the tree protection guidelines. Access routes, storage areas , and work procedures will be discussed. Tree Protection Zones and Fence Specifi cations Tree protection fence should be established prior to the arrival of construction equipment or materials on site. Fence should be comprised of six-foot high chain link fence mounted on eight- foot tall, l 7/8-inch diameter galvanized posts, driven 24 inches into the ground and spaced no more than 10 feet apart. Once establ ished , the fence must remain undisturbed and be maintained throughout the construction process until final inspection. The fence should be maintained throughout the site during the construction period and should be inspected periodically for damage and proper functions. Fence should be repaired, as necessary, to provide a physical barrier from construction activities . A final inspection by the city arborist at the end of the project will be required prior to removing any tree protection fence and replacement tree shall be planted at this time. Monitoring Any trenching, construction or demolition that is expected to damage or encounter tree roots should be monitored by the project arborist or a qualified ISA Certified Arborist and should be documented. The site should be evaluated by the project arborist or a qualified ISA Certified Arborist after construction is complete, and any necessary remedial work that needs to be performed should be noted. Restrictions Within the Tree Protection Zone No storage of construction materials, debris , or excess soil will be allowed within the Tree Protection Zone . Spoils from the trenching shall not be placed within the tree protection zone either temporarily or pennanently. Constrnction personnel and equipment shall be routed outside the tree protection zones . Monarch Consulting Arborists LLC -P.O Box 1010, Felton , CA 95018 831.331 .8982 -rick@monarcharborist.com Page 26 of 31 15975 Union Avenue Tree Inventory, Assessment , and Protection Plan January 5, 2015 Root Pruning Root pruning shall be supervised by the project arborist. When roots over two inches in diameter are encountered they should be pruned by hand with loppers, handsaw, reciprocating saw, or chain saw rather than left crushed or tom. Roots should be cut beyond sinker roots or outside root branch junctions and be supervised by the project arborist. When completed , exposed roots should be kept moist with burlap or ba ckfilled within one hour. Boring or Tunneling Boring machines should be set up outside the drip line or established Tree Protection Zone. Boring may also be perfonned by digging a trench on both sides of the tree until roots one inch in diameter are encountered and then hand dug or excavated with an Air Spade® or similar air or water excavation tool. Bore holes should be adjacent to the trunk and never go directly under the main stem to avoid oblique (heart) roots . Bore holes should be a minimum of three feet deep. Timing If the construction is to occur during the summer months supplemental watering and bark beetle treatments should be applied to help ensure survival during and after construction. Tree Pruning and Removal Operations All tree pruning or removals should be perfonned by a qualified arborist with a C-6 l /D-49 California Contractors License . Tree pruning should be specified according to ANSI A-300A pruning standards and adhere to ANSI Z 133 .1 safety standards. Trees that need to be removed or pruned should be identified in the pre-construction walk through . Tree Protection Signs All sections of fencing should be clearly marked with signs stating that all areas within the fencing are Tree Protection Zon es and that disturbance is prohibited. Text on the signs should be in both English and Spanish (Appendix E). Monarch Consulting Arborists LLC -P.O Box 1010, Felton , CA 95018 831 .331 .8982 -rick@monarcharborist.com Page 27 of 31 15975 Union Avenue Tree Inventory, Assessment , and Protection Plan January 5, 2015 Appendix E: Tree Protection Signs E1:English +-' :J -0 Q) ..c:: c: +-' c: ·-0 Q) ~ en c "'C ,._ 0 Q) Q) Cl. -as N > 0 "'C Q) CJ E Q) ,._ c ctS N z 0 a> ·c en ·-.c 0 :.c -+-' z u +-' ..c:: +-' 0 +-' ,._ a: Q) c: :J Q) +-' ctS +-' ~ 0 = ~ c: L.. ctS -Q) a.. ..c:: c: ~ Cl) 0 ctS Q) Q) E Q) (.) -= c:: ctS L.. Q) > I--u... e (J) ·c 0 en Cl. .0 ~ ·-Cl. <( ..c:: -ctS (.) Q) I-._,, 0 ~ CL ~ Monarch Consulting Arborists LLC -P.O Box 101 O, Felton, CA 95018 831 .3 31 .8982 -rick@monarcharborist.com Page 28 of 31 s: 0 ::i Ill () :::r (') 0 CX> ::i VJ (/) _._ £. w g- VJ <O :-" }> CX> ..., co O" CX>O I\) ::!. ' !!?. ..., (/) O' r "' r @ (') 3 ' g :-ti Ill 0 () Cll :::r 0 Ill x ..., _._ O" 0 Q _._ (ij'O ...... -0 ,., 0 CD 3 §' -u Ill <O CD I\) co Q. VJ _._ ::i (') }> co U'I 0 _._ CD CUI DADO Zona De Arbol Pretejido Esta cerca no sera removida sin aprobacion. Solo personal autorizado entrara en esta area! Project Arborist 15975 Union Avenue Tree Inventory, Assessment , and Protection Plan January 5 . 2015 Qualifications, Assumptions, and Limiting Conditions Any legal description provided to the consultant is assw11ed to be correct. Any titles or ownership of properties are assumed to be good and marketable . All property is appraised or evaluated as though free and clear, Wlder responsible ownership and competent management. All property is presumed to be in confonnance with applicab le codes, ordinances, statutes , or other regulations. Care has been taken to obtain information from rel iable sources. However, the consultant cannot be responsible for the accuracy of information provided by others. The consultant shall not be required to give testimony or attend meet ings, bearings, conferences , mediations, arbitration, or trials by reason of this report unless subsequent contractual anangements are made, including payment of an additional fee for such services. This report and any appraisal value expressed herein represent the opinion of the consu ltant, and the consultant's fee is not contingent upon the rep orting of a specified appraisal value, a stipulated result, or the occunence of a subsequent event. Sketches, drawings , and photographs in this report are intended for use as visual aids, are not necessarily to scale, and should not be construed as engineering or architectura l reports or surveys. The reproduction of information generated by architects, engineers, or other consultants on any sketches, drawings, or photographs is only for coordination and ease of reference . Inclusion of said informatjou with any drawings or other documents does not constitute a representation as to the sufficiency or accuracy of said information. Unless otherwise expressed : a) this report covers only examined items and their condition at the time of inspection ; and b) the inspection is limited to visual examination of accessible items without russection , excavation, probing, or coring. There is no warranty or guarantee, expressed or implied, that structura l problems or deficiencies of plants or property may not arise in the future . Monarch Consulting Arborists LLC -P.O Box 1010 , Felton , CA 95018 831 .331.8982 -rick@monarcharborist.com Page 30 of 31 15975 Union Avenue Tree Inventory, Assessment, and Protection Plan January 5, 2015 Certification of Performance J Richard Gessner, Certify: That I have personally inspected the tree(s) and/or the property referred to in this repo11 , and have stated my findings accurately. The extent of the evaluation and/or appraisal is stated in the attached rep011 and Terms of Assignment; That I have no current or prospective interest in th e vegetation or the property that is the subject of this report, and I have no p ersonal interest or bias with respect to the parties involved; That the analysis, opinions and conclusions s tated herein are my own: That my analysis, opinions, and conclusions were developed and this report ha s been prepared according to commonly accepted ArboricuJtural practices; That no one provided significant professional assistance to the consultant, except as indicated within the report. That my compensation is not contingent upon the reporting of a predetermined conclusion that favors the cause of the client or any other party, nor upon the results of the assessment, the attainment of stipulated results, or the occurrence of any other subsequent events; l further certify that I am a Registered Consulting Arborist® with the Ame1ican Society of Consulting Arborists, and that I acknowledge, accept and adhere to the ASCA Standards of Professional Practice. I am an International Society of Arboriculture Board Certified Master Arborist® and Tree Risk Assessor Qualified. I have been involved with the practice of ArboricuJture and the care and study of trees since 1998. Richard J. Gessner ASCA Registered Consulting Arborist® #496 ISA Board Certified Master Arborist® WE-4341B 1SA Tree Risk Assessor Qualified Copyright © Copyri ght 2015 , Monarch Consulting Arborists LLC . Other th an specific exception granted for copies made by the client for the express u ses stated in this report, no parts of this publication may be repro du ced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, recording, or otherwise wi th out the express. written permission of the author. Monarch Consulting Arborists LLC -P.0 Box 1010, Felton, CA 95018 831 .331 .8982 -rick@monarcharborist.com Page 31 of 31 Deborah Ellis, MS Consuttlng Arborlst & Horticulturist 4 Jennifer Savage Town of Los Gatos Community Planning Department 110 E. Main Street Los Gatos, CA 95031 April 3, 2015 15975 Union Avenue Subdivision Appllcaffon M-15-001 Arborlst Review of Plans and Previous Arbor1st Report Phot o #1. Proj ect s ite at t~ cor ner of Union Avenue ond Bloss om Valley Road. Un ion Avenue is in the foregr ound. An arrow po ints to coast redwood tree #1223. Dear Jennifer: Service since 1984 RECEIVED APR -3 2015 . •. TO~ OF LOS GATOS PLANNING DIVISION Photo #2. Redwood tree #1723 viewed from the s ite, looking toward Union Avenue in the background . I reviewed the following documents before visiting the p roject site on February 13, 2015 : • Tree Inventory. Assessment and Protection Plan for 15975 Union Avenue. Monarch Consulting Arborists, Richard Gessner, January 5, 2015. · • Project Plgo set with cover sheet date of February 5. 2015. Koh Isa at Architects. EXHIBIT 9 PO Box 3714 , Saratoga, CA 95070. 408-725-1357. decah@pacbell.net. http://www.decah.corn. 15975 Union Ave. Arborist Review #1. April 3, 2015. Page 1 of 7 Deborah Ellis, MS Consulting Arborlst & Horticulturist Service since 1984 Summary: The existing single-family house and outbuildings are proposed to be demolished and the lot subdivided into 3 lots each containing one single-family, two-story house. The site is currently unkempt jungle of tangled growth and debris. Many of the trees are crowded and shaded and would not be good candidates for preservation even if enough undisturbed space remained around them. All existing trees and other vegetation on the lot are proposed to be demolished with the exception of one multi-trunk coast redwoodi tree #1223 located near the east perimeter of the site, close to the corner of Union Avenue and Blossom Hill Road. This is a large redwood tree with trunk diameters (at 3 feet) of 28, 32, 1 O and 6 inches. I estimate the height of the tree to be 45 to 50 feet tall, and its canopy spread to be 30 to 35 feet. Proposed improvements (sidewalk, house porch, drainage pipe and landscaping) are much too close to this tree, and must be moved farther from the trunk if this tree is to remain. Discussion: Redwood #1723 is a stump sprout tree1 that is not in good condition. My own evaluation as well as the evaluation of arborist Richard Gessner in his January 5 report lists the tree's condition as only "Fair". This can be evidenced by looking at the tree's canopy_ density, which decreases relative to the tree's height (see photo #3, page 3). This lock of vigor is likely caused by several years of drought and lack of irrigation to compensate for this. Despite the lack of irrigation however, the tree has a couple of things in its favor - a relatively undisturbed site with a thick mulch layer and sheltering understory vegetation {see photo #4, page 3). Lack of pruning, a good thing in this case, has also allowed live low branches to remain on the tree which help to shade the root system and increases humidity. Unfortunately I all of the good things going for redwood #1723 will be taken away from the tree as the property is developed. Site clearing, removal of lower branches of the tree to increase visibility, the removal of mulch, loss of roots due to nearby improvements, compaction of the soil due to construction -all of this will be very detrimental to this tree which is not in good condition to begin with. Perhaps it is better to remove the redwood tree now and revegetate with new trees and other vegetation. Then you will not hove to work around all of the redwood tree-related constraints that are necessary for the tree's long-term survival. Richard Gessner's report also lists the Suitability for Preservation of this tree as "Poor". If this redwood is to remain, improvements must be moved farther from the trunk. There should be no soil disturbance within a minimum of 20 feet2 on all sides of the tree. The sidewalk could be moved so that it is flush with Union Avenue: thus eliminating the parkstrip planter between sidewalk and street. In addition the lower live branches of this tree should be retained to continue to shade the root system, and the natural layer of thick mulch (the tree's own leaf and twig litter on top of the 1 Terms highlighted at their first occurrence in this report are explained in the Glossary on pages 6 and 7. 2 20 feet is the calculated 5xDBH distance for this tree. 12.5 feet is the 3xDBH distance. See page 6 for an e lanation of these root rotection distances. PO Box 3714, Saratoga., CA 95070. 408-725-1357. decah@pacbell.net. http://www.decoh.com. 15975 Union Ave. Arborist Review #1. April 3, 2015. Page 2 of 7 Deborah Ellis, MS Consulting Arboriet & Horticutturlet "' Service nna 198" ground surface) must remain within the protected root zone area around the t ree . An irrigation system must a lso be supplied for the tree (see page 4). A second but less d e si ra ble optjon f or redesjg o jn the vlcjnity of the redwood would be to move imp rove ments as f oll ows . Im provements will cause no so il dist urbanc e within a minimum of 20 feet on all sides of the tree except for the sidewalk to the east, which should be moved as far as possible from the trunk, eliminating t he planter between sidewalk and street within 20 feet of the redwood. The planter strip can remain farther than 20 feet and the sidewalk can curve toward the street w ithin 20 feet of the redwood's trunk. Sidewalk construction under the dripline and within 20 feet of the edge of the trunk of the tree !whichever Is greater) shall be constructed by hand d igging and carefully and cleanly cutting roots that must be removed. The tree must be well hydrated (by supplemental irrigation) prior to construction and for a t least a year afterward. A qualified consulting arborist (the project arborist) must supervise and document this work including tree irrigation. It is possible that large and/or many roots will need to be cut for the sidewalk construction and the arborist may determine that the redwood tree should be removed for reasons of safety. A thjrd option which could be consi dered jn conjunctjon wjth the ootlon qbove. would be to construct the sidewalk so that It is raised above the roots (e.g. wood decking portion) on raised p iers, or in some other manner to eliminate or reduce root removal. Photo #3 Cleft): upper half of the canopy of redwood m.723, looking somewhat sparse. Sparseness increases with height. Photo #4 (right}: note the sheltered, shaded condition around redwood #1723, as well as the thick natural mulch layer. PO Box 3714, Saratoga, CA 95070. 408-725-1357. decah@pacbell.net. http://www .decah.com . 15975 Union Ave . Arborist Review #1. April 3, 2015. Page 3 of 7 Deborah Ellis, MS Consulting Arborlst & Horticulturist Neighboring Trees : There are two coast redwood trees listed in Richard Gessner's report. These are trees #1662 and 1663 with trunk diameters of 30 and 24 inches, respectively. They are located across from the existing garage on the Home #2 Lot, across from a roadway/fire truck: turnaround area. I would like the proposed roadway moved another 12 inches from the property line to better protect these trees. Right now the roadway is 5 feet from the property line. Please move the roadway so that it is no closer than 6 feet from the property line. The canopies of these trees also overhang the project site by about 15 feet -so the canopies should be fenced off at the tree's driplines until roadway construction begins. When construction begins the fencing may be moved back toward the trees to a distance of 12 inches behind the edge of the roadway across from the trees. Recommendations: 1. Redwood #1723: .Service since 1984 a. Decide to save or remove the tree. If the tree will be retained, follow the recommendations explained in the Discussion section of this report, on pages 2 and 3. b. If redwo~d #1723 ls saved, H must be clearly shown on all site-based plans along with Its tree number. c. Redwood #1723 shall have dedicated Irrigation (irrigation separate from the irrigation of other plants or planting areas on site) as follows:. Netafim™ in-line drip irrigation tubing, installed on top of the ground surface but underneath them mulch layer that is to remain around the tree. The drip tubing shall be installed throughout the entire root protection zone around the tree as described in the Summary on page 1. Emitters in the dripiine shall be space 12 inches on center and the lines shall be arranged 12 inches on center. The irrigation should be run so that the soil is wetted to a depth of 12-18 inches deep once per month during rainless months or whenever the soil is dry to a depth of 6 inches. Trenching for connection to the water line shall take place out of the root protection area designated for this tree. d. Landscaping around redwood #1723: there shall be no planting within a minimum radius of 12 feet from the trunk. Beyond 12 feet there may be sparse planting of plants with similar water requirement as coast redwoods (high water requirement, as per the current PO Box 3714, Saratoga, CA 95070. 408-725-1357. decah@pacbell.net. http://www.decah.com. 15975 Union Ave. Arborist Review #1. April 3, 2015. Page 4 of 7 Deborah E llis, MS Conaultlng Arborlst & Horticulturist Servia ma 1984 WUCOLS list, e .g . ferns) of plants from no larger than 1-gallon containers. Planting holes for these plants shall be dug by hand using no power equipment. 2. For those trees that will be retained on the site, follow the Tree Protecflon SQeclflcatlons In Richard Gessner's January 5, 2015 reporl as well as the Town of Los Gatos Tree Protection Directions. A separate copy of the Town Directions is enclosed and must be incorporated into the project final plans. Richard Gessner's Tree Protecti on Specifications must also be incorporated into the plans. 3. Neigblao.tng redwood nee• #1662 and 1663 must be numbered and shown on all site- based as well, along with the Type l tree protection fencing to be installed around these trees. Move t he proposed roadway/fire truck turnaround to at least 6 feet from the existing fence near the property line. 4 . I should review all site-based plans for this project: I have reviewed the plans fisted on page 1. Additional improvements on plans that were not re viewed may cause additional trees to be impacted and/or removed. Examples of important plans fo review are: the Existing and Proposed Site Plan, Demolition, Construction Staging, Erosion Control, Grading &·Drainage, Underground Utilities, landscaping & Irrigation, Building Elevations & Sections, Roof Plan and Construction & Landscape Details showing improvements that may Impact trees. Therefore the tree dispositions (Save, Remove or Debatable ) list ed in this report may change if and when additional plans for this proj ect are reviewed, or If plans that I have reviewed a re revised . Plans reviewed by the arborfst should be full-size, t o-scale and with accurately locat~d tree trunks and canopy d ri plines relative to proposed improvements. Scale should be 1 :20 or 1: l 0. 5. Construction or landscaping work done undemeath the drlpline of existing trees should preferably be done by hand. taking care to preserve existing roots in undamaged condition as much as possible and cutting roots cleanly. by hand when first encountered, when those roots must be removed. A qualified consulting arborist (the project arborist) should be hired to monitor tree p rotection and supervise all work underneath the dripline of trees. This also applies to trees on neighboring properties whose canopies overhang the work site. 6. General Tree Maintenance: Do no unnecessary pruning, fer!illzaHon or other tree work. Pre- construction pruning should be li mited to the a bsolute minimum required for construction clearance. A qualified tree service should be hired to provide such pruning. PO Box 3714 , Saratoga, CA 95070. 408-725-1357. decoh@pncbell.net. http://www.decah.com . 15975 Union Ave . Arborist Review #1. April 3; 2015. Page 5 of 7 Deborah Ellis, MS Consulting Arborist & Hort!culturis1 Seff.lice since 1984 ****************************** I certify that the information contained in this report is correct to the best of my knowledge, and that this report was prepared in good faith. Thank you for the opportunity to provide service again. Please call me if you have questions or if I can be of further assistance. ~UL Deborah Ellis, MS. Consulting Arborist & Horticulturist Certified Professional Horticulturist #30022 ASCA Registered Consulting Arborist #305 LS.A. Board Certified Master Arborist WE-457B LS.A. Tree Risk Assessment Qualified Enclosure: Los Gatos General Tree Protection Directions. Glossary 1. 3 to 5 X DBH: No one can estimate and predict with absolute certainty how far a soil disturbance such as an excavation must be from the edge of the trunk of an individual tree to effect tree stability or health at a low, moderate or severe degree --there are simply too many variable involved that we cannot see or anticipate. 3xDBH however; is a reasonable "rule of thumb· minimum distance (in feet) any excavation should be from the edge of the trunk on one side of the trunk. This is supported by several separate research studies including (Smiley, Fraedrich, & Hendrickson 2002, Bartlett Tree Research Laboratories). DBH is trunk "diameter at breast height" (4.5 feet above the ground). This distance is often used during the design and planning phases of a construction project in order to estimate root damage to a tree due to the proposed construction. It tends to correlate reasonably well with the zone of rapid taper, which is the area in which the large buttress roots (main support roots close to the trunk) rapidly decrease in diameter with increasing distance from the trunk. For example, using the 3X DBH guideline an excavation should be no closer than 4.5 feet from the trunk of an 18-inch DBH tree. For trees with multiple trunks, an adjusted DBH is often calculated using 100% of the largest trunk plus 50% of the remaining smaller trunks. Such distances are guidelines only, and should be increased for trees with heavy canopies, significant leans, decay, structural problems, etc. I will generally not recommend a root protection distance of less than 3 feet for any tree, even very small trees. It is also important to understand that in actual field conditions we often find that much less root damage occurs than was anticipated by the guidelines. 3xDBH may be more of an aid in preserving tree stability and not necessarily long-term tree health. 5X DBH or greater is the "preferred" minimum distance which should be strived for, and this distance or greater should probably be used when there are multiple trenches on more than one side of the trunk. The roots beyond the zone of rapid taper form an extensive network of long, rope-like roots one to two inches in diameter. These woody perennial roots are referred to as transport roots because they function primarily to transport water and minerals. Maintaining a 5xOBH tree protection zone or greater around a tree will preserve more of these transport roots, which will have less of an impact on tree health than if the excavation were closer to the trunk. PO Box 3714, Saratoga, CA 95070. 408-725-1357. decah@pocbell.net. http://www.decoh.com. 15975 Union Ave. Arborist Review #1. April 3, 2015. Page 6 of 7 Debora h Ellis, MS Consulting Arborlst & Hortlculturlst • Service sina 1984 2. Arborlst, Project. The arborist who rs appointed to be in charge of arborlst services for the project. That arborist shall also be a qualified consulti ng arborist (either an International Society of Art>orlc1,llture (ISA) Board-Certified Master Arborlst or an American Society of Consulting Arborlsts (ASCA) Registered Consulting Arborist) that has sufficient knowledge and experience to perform the specific work required. For most construction projects that work will include inspection and documentation of tree protection fencing and other tree protection procedures , and being available to assist with tree-related issues that come up during the project. 3. Arborist. Qualified ConsultJng: must be either an International Society of Arboriculture (ISA) Board - Certified Master Arborist or an American SOciety of Consulting Arborists (ASCA) Registered Consulting Arborlst that has sufficient knowledge and experience to perform the specific work required . 4. Canopy density refer& to the percentage of leaf cover in a tree canopy (after full leaf expansion and maturation), which varies with tree species and age. A lower than normal canopy density can indicate tree decline or some other problem such as insect or pathogen.caused defoliation. 5. DrlDllne: the area under the total branch spread of the tree, al! around the tree. Although tree roots may extend out 2 to 3 times the rad ius of the dripline, a great concentration of active roots is often In the soil directly beneath this area The dripline is often used as an arbitrary •tree protection zone". 6. Quallfttd Irv Service: A tree service is a company that performs tree pruning and tree removals as their main business. A Qualified Tree Service is a tree service with a supervising arborist who has the minimum certification level of ISA (International Society of Arboriculture) Certified Arborist and acts in a supervisory position on the job site during execution Of the tree work. The tree service shall have a State of California Contractor's license for Tree Service (C61-049) and provide proof of Workman's Compensation and General Liab ility Insurance. The person(s) performing the tree work must adhere to the most current of the following arboricultural industry tree care standards : • Best Management Practices, Tree Pruning. 2008. International Society of Arboriculture, PO ~x 3129, Champaign, IL 61826-3129. 217-355-9411 • ANSI A300 Pruning Standards. 2008 Edition . Ibid. (Covers tree care methodology). • ANSI Z133.1 Safety Requirements for Aiboricu/tural Operations. 2006 Edition. Ibid. (Covers safety). 7. Stump sprout trees are the result of a tree trunk being cut down to a short stump close to the ground. If the tree survives , it sends out many small shoots (suckers) from around the cut stump. Some of these suck•rs may survive and grow to become significant trunks . These trunks are spaced very close together and usually have included bark between them, which reduces the strength of their union . Such trunks are prone to failure. Stump sprout trees can be very structuraly unsound, particularly as they become large and old. There is often a great deal of decay associated with the mother stu'mp, which can also reduce mechanical stability. 8. WUCOLS:.Water Requirements as referenced in this report refer to W.U.C.O.L.S. (Water Use Classification of Landscape Species - a Guide to the Water Needs of Landscape Plants). This is now available online at: http://www.water.ca.gov. Go to this web site, then type "WUCOLs· in the Search box. Then see the Species Evaluation Ust beginning on page 63. The entire fde path is: http://www.water.ca.gov/wateruseefficiencWdocs/wucolsOO .pdf PO Box 3714, Saratoga, CA 95070. 408-725-1357. decoh@pacbell.net. http://www.decoh.com. 15975 Union Ave. Arborist Review #1. April 3, 2015, Page 7 of 7 LOS GATOS GENERAL TREE PROTECTION DIRECTIONS Note that the following is excerpted from Division 2 (rree Protection) of the Los Gatos Town Code and does not constitute the complete Division 2 text. The owner/applicant is responsible for Implementing all pertinent requirements of the Code relative to tree protection. August 7, 2014 Sec. 29.10.1000 New Property Development (l l The final approved Tree Preservation Report shall be included in the building permit set of development plans and printed on a sheets titled: Tree Preservation Instruction !Sheet T-1. T-2. etc.I. These Sheets shall be referenced on all relevant sheets {civil, demolition, utility, landscape, irrigation) where tree impacts from improvements may be shown to occur. (3.b.l The site or landscape plans shall indicate which trees are to be removed. However. the olans do not constitute approval to remove a tree until a separate permit is granted. The property owner or applicant shall obtain a protected tree removal permit, as outlined in section 29.10.0980 for each tree to be removed to satisfy the purpose of this definition. (3.e.l Protective fencing inspection: Prior to issuance of any demolition, grading or building permit, the applicant or contractor shall submit to the building department a written statement verifying that the required tree protection fence is installed around street trees and protected trees in accordance with the Tree Preservation Report. (3.g.) An applicant with a proposed development which requires underaround utilities shall avoid the installation of said utilities within the dripline of existing trees whenever possible. In the event that this is unavoidable, all trenching shall be done using directional boring, air- spade excavation or by hand, taking extreme caution to avoid damage to the root structure. Work within the dripline of existing trees shall be supervised at all times by a certified or consulting arborist. Section 29 .10.1005 Protection ofTrees During Construction a) Protective tree fencing shall specify the following: l) Size and materials: A five (5) or six (6) foot high chain link fencing, mounted on two-inch diameter galvanized iron posts, shall be driven into the ground to a depth of at least two (2) feet at no more than l 0-foot spacing. For paving area that will not be demolished and when stipulated in a tree preservation plan, posts may be supported by a concrete base. 2) Area type to be fenced. ~: Enclosure with chain link fencing of either the entire dripline area or at the tree protection zone {TPZ), when specified by a certified or consulting arborist 1• ~:Enclosure for street trees located in a planter strip: chain link fence around the entire planter strip to the outer branches. Type Ill: Protection for a tree located in a small planter cutout only (such as downtown): orange plastic fencing shall be wrapped around the trunk from the ground to the first branch with 2-inch wooden boards 1 If it is not possible to place Type 1 or Type 2 tree protection fencing at the dripline due to the construction, then place the fencing as far from the trunk as possible, including as much of the dripline as possible, while still allowing for enough room to build improvements. If this happens to be within all or some of the dripline, then so be it. But the contractor must try to fence off as much area under the canopy as possible, do not be irresponsible about this. Los Gatos General Tree Protection Directions. Page 1 of 2 bound securely on the outside. Caution shall be used to avoid damaging any bark or branches. 3) Duration of Type I, II, Ill fencing. Fencing shall be erected before demolition, grading or construction begins and remain in place until final landscaping is required. Contractor shall first obtain the approval of the project arborist on record prior to removing a tree protection fence . .4) Warning sign. Each tree fence shall have prominent:y displayed an 8.5 x 11-inch sign stating: "Warning-Tree Protection Zone-this fence shall not be removed and is subject to penalty according to Town Code 29.10.1025". A template sign has been provided to be used on the project site. b) All persons. shall comply with the following orecautions: 1} Prior to the commencement of construction, install the fence at the dripline, or tree protection zone (TPZ) when specified in an approved orborist report, around any tree and/or vegetation to be retained which could be affected by the construction and prohibit any storage of construction materials or other materials or vehicles inside the fence. The dripline shall not be altered in any way so as to increase the encroachment of the construction. 2} Prohibit excavation, grading. drainage and levellng within the drlpllne of the tree unless approved by the director. 3) ProhibH disposal or depositing of oll, gasoline, chemicals or other harmful materlals within the drlpllne of or In drainage channels, swales or areas that may lead to the dripline of a protected tree 4) Prohibit the attachment of wires. signs or ropes to any protected tree. 5) Design utlllty services and Irrigation Jines to be located outside of the dripline wh~n feasible. 6) Retain the services of the certHled or consulting arborist for periodic monitoring of the project site and the health of those trees to be preserved. The certified or consulting arborist shall be present whenever activities occur that pose a potential threat to the health of the trees to be preserved. 7) The director and project arborist shall be notified of any damage that occurs to a protected tree during construction so that proper treatment may be administered. SecHon 29.10.1010 Pruning and Maintenance All pruning of protected trees shall be consistent with the current edition of Best Management Practices -Tree Pruning, established by the International Society of Arboriculture (ISA) and any special conditions as determined by the Director. For developments, which require a tree preservation report, a certified or consulting arborist shall be in reasonable charge of all activities involving protected trees including cabling, and fertmzing if specified. l ) Any public utilHy installing or maintaining any overhead wires or underground pies or conduits in the vicinity of a protected tree shall obtain permission from the Director before performing anywortc, including pruning. which may cause injury to a protected tree (e.g. cable TV /fiber optic trenching, gas, water, sewer trench. etc.) 2) Pruning for clearance of utility lines and energized conductors shall be performed in compliance with the current version of the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) A300 (Part 1) -Pruning, Section 5.9 Utility Pruning. Using spikes or gaffs when pruning is prohibited. Los Gatos General Tree Protection Directions. Page 2 of 2 This Page Intentionally Left Blank \ ,. ,, VICINITY MAP .,.,,, i " ~ i , ...... LOS GATOS ............ ~"/ll!'•t t1•'-"~. t ' f ~ ''I,,. • !> / , / J < ' ' , . I ~ ~ ........ ~ 0 l 9 i t • " ""'·· \ LOT2 SITE DATA ZONING: S ITE AAEA (Al.I..): 6ETC.HART UNION AV ENUE JOINT V eNTVRE PAATN~e.H IP C.10 D eN~I GROUP 54"1 F IRST S"i'R2T L.OS AL. TOS, C.A. ".4022 15'M5 UN IO N AVeNUE I.OS GAT05, C.A "1505.2 5.25-4.2-011 R-1:10 45, 104 SF (.'i'I Ac.) PROJECT DIRECTORY -GH ITEGT, l<OHL$AAT • .-ssoc.i.•.-res 5 1 UNrv'ERSITY AVfNUE , S\lln L LOS GATOS. GA '15030 T~, (408) S~2555 LAND1'>GAPf Af"GHrr=T Gt'EG LEl'<lS LAND1'>G ... FE -GHrTe.c.T $ANT A CR.LIZ, GA ct50b5 TEL, (f>51) 42,.....141 !iOIL. EN6tN~: &II.ICON VA!..LE"!' =IL ENG,'<EB<ING .:>S'l l ZANK!:!< !<O;.t:> SU~ S!SO $AN~=. c.A TEL' (408) S.:>4-1 400 GML fNGINEf!f"· HANNA-E!f"UNl!TTI 1b51 f lGLE!!>eJO.RY STRUT GIL.ROY, Gil\ Cl'.50~ Ta.. (AC8) 842-2115 j,.'<.E!QRIST ~Gfe.SN~ MONARCH CONStlL TING A~C>Re~L.LG PO eox 10 10 fl!LTON, GA '1501f> (8Sl lSSl -8°.!>2 SCOPE OF WORK REMOVE EXISTING STRUC.TIJRES FROM PFtOFeRTY, C.REATE THREE Nl:Y'! l..OTS AND 6 UIL.D THReE NEY'l S INGL.!: FAMIL.Y R!:SIDENC.ES: L.OT 1 -S ,SC\e Sf RESIDeNC.E l"llTH ;~ SF GARAGE; L.OT .:2 -5 ,56e SF RESIPeNC.e l"llTH ;s; SF GAAAGE; I.OT s -5 ,S6e SF RESID!!:NC.!: )llllTH 151 SF GARAGE. PROJECT DATA ~ 51'Tl!ARfA• 12 ,""I S~ ALL01'1AE!U! A1<EA5, HOIJ5f ~.A!< • ~5 -( ~ X 2 I :.55 -Ob• .281 2 5 1 x t 2,886 • f'l ,6'1Z> SF( GAAAGf ~ ,.. R • 10 X I~ X .01) • .10-.022 • .018 .018 X 1.:>,006 • j1.004 5Fj ALLOl'V'of!U! 5'!1<.UGTU!l.AL COVEl<AGE • 5 ,116 SF f"li.OP05W !>TRUGTU!l.AL C:.OVERAGE • 2 ,'158 SF IMPE!'tVIOU& COVERAGE • 9 ,666 !If Sl~.2 SITf ,-.Rl!,.O.' 11,951 5F ALLO"'IAEILI! Ai<eAS, ROIJ!! ~Ail • .!!!! -I 11 •HI X .2 I • .55 -.Os • .aoo 25 soo x 11.s52 • (S ,406 SFj GA!'tAG!! FA"' • 10 x 111 255 x .011 . 10-.0 18. oi8 092 x 11 .552 • j<;S1 SFJ AL.l.O"'IAE!L!! STl<.UGTIJ!t,&J. COVERAG!! • A .SAO SF f"li.OP05W 5'1'1lUGTUl't"'1-COVeiv.GE • 2 ,qe.8 SF IMPe"-"'10V5 GO>/et_,,.<;E i-S .ce; 5f AL~U!,o.JllfAS t'!OLJS! P::A ft • !! -1 11.-4-5 x ~ l =SS -.o~ = .$00 ~ ~~=~~ soo x 11 ,ss2 , !S.406 SF/ GA"AGre",..,P' 1: 1ox 1114--5 ><.01J1: 10-.0 1e= .oie 082 x 1~,;52 . ~S 1 SFI ...._LOl'V'of!Lf 5'!1<.UGTV!'lAL COVERAGE' 4 .S"l SF PROPO!>W STRUGTU!O.AL COVERAGE' 2.9!'>2 SF IMFE<i<V IOUS COV!!R ... ~f '4 , 192 !If P1<0f'05E[) -~ f lllST fl..OOR 1,850 5f seGOND fLOO!l 1 !MS s~ TOTAi.. 1s .§"1e ~Fj ""'OPO!>ED A!'teA:;, Fl!<!IT FLOOR 1,6 .. 6 5f ~~~FLOOR~ S ITe -;;;o ,, 1'0.2 /'O.S C.IVIL. C.1 C.2 C.5 C.4 C.5 C.6 C.I c.e L.OT 1 Al .1 A1.:2 A1.5 A1 .4 A1 .5 A1.6 L.OT.:2 A.2 .1 A.2" A.2 .5 A:l.4 A.2 .S "2.6 l..OT5 AS.1 AS.:.l AS.S AS.4 AS.S AS.6 STUDIES A4.1 A4 . .:2 1..1 L.:2 SHEET INDEX C.OVER SHEET FL.OT PL.AN S ITe Pl.AN C IVIL. COVER 61.UEPRINT FOR A C.L.EAN 6AY STANDARD GRADING NOTES DEMOl..IT ION Pl.AN SITe Fl.AN GRADING AND DRAINAG!: Pl.AN STORP-1 DRAIN 6A51N Pl.AN E!'<.OSION CONTROL. PL.AN FIRST Fl..OOR PL.AN SECOND FL..OOR FL.AN ROOF PL.AN FRONT 4 1..eFT !:L.!:VATIONS A REAR 4 R IGHT e L..EVATIONS A C.Fi.055 SEC. T IO NS F IRST FL.OOR FL.AN 5Ec.oND Fl..OOR PL.AN ROOF PL.AN FRONT 4 L.eFT !01.EVATION REAA 4 R IGHT EL.EVATION SECTIONS F IRST Fl..OOR PL.AN SEC.ONti FL.OOR PL.AN ROOF PL.AN FRONT 4 I.EFT EL.eVATION& ReAR 4 R !GHT e i.e vATIONS SECTIONS SHADO~ STUDY STREeT~APE Pl.ANTING Pl.AN EXISTIN G TRe!: 1..15T REVISIONS 00 0 v) ~ 0 ~ ~ 0 ti') z < 0 ...J 0 CJ',) ~ > 00 5 co ~ ::.J ti') UJ 3 z ~ w z z UJ <( 0 ~ ...c z 0 z z ::;) ~ .,., ~ Ir) DAT lo. 2 /S/15 SCA l.I " A:. !IHOl'\'N S II hi· 1 AO.I 1 or - EXHIBIT 1 0 ADJACENT RESIDENCE 1()6 ADJACENT RESIDE>ICE ADJACENT RES IDENCE 100 LEEWOODCT. IO I ADJACENT RESIDENCE Lil ::i z UJ ,> < z 0 z ::i I -1 I I I I ADJACENT RESIDENCE ISOIO I I 100 BLO SSOM HI LL ROAD I I I I I L-__ J LJ 10.. LASUEN COU RT ADJACENT RESIDENCC ADJACENT RESIDENCE PLOT PLAN ecAL.e: 1" =SO' NE\ll S IO :S <( 00 u (/) ~ 0 ~ E-c 0 (/) :i < 0 ,_J 0 (/) E-c > B 00 co ~ ::i (/) 1.1.l 3 ::i l.JJ z z z 1.1.l 0 > <( <( z ~ 0 z z ::i ~ ,,.., ~ ,,.., DAIL ~/1 5 SC.II.le AS 5HOY'lN S II Ii l'.I A0 .2 2 0 1· - 'b"°., wa te r m a i n l lW)-----~--+;--------tW)-----~--......,1-------~1----~~---l'-------~~Vl)-~~~--r-----~----(W)------T----'-_i-~~---- H i I I ~ c 0 ·-§: = ;J [ '2 ;;;- !!?. .. 3: .. c; "' E "' "' ' U) 3: a •. ,"". . ., .. · ' "i.J<.-------~1 ·~::: ~ -----------~----Ill ~ IQ 211.eo· I I I I OUT!.: E :ind VFL..0 0!0. I r- ____ ...J HOME 2 (,. "· :!'l&.1 0 ) eo .oo· ~ !U ~ ,--t---11 0 -~ 00.00' SITE PLAN eC.AL.I!!: 1" : 10 ' RE\ll SI O~S rJJ 25 vi ~ 0 ~ ~ 0 (/) z < 0 0 ..J ~ ~ > rJJ 15 co ~ :::> (/') Ul ~ z :::> LlJ z z Ul 0 > <( <( ..-c z 0 z 5 ~ <n r-O'I ,,., DATE :!/!S/1!5 SCALl: AS SHO~ S 11 l:ET A0 .3 5 OF - Tentative Map Grading & Drainage Plans for 15975 Union Avenue in the Town of Los Gatos Santa Clara County, California ~ VICINITY MAP Li::.:.J NO SCAl.E ABBR EVIA TlONS AC .\SPHAlT COOCR£1E fl flO'll'\lHE A8 AGGREGATE BAS£ ;.(J AAtA DRAIN G GAS LmE Gii GAS WETER BC BECINNINC OF CUR'<!: B1.DG BUIUllNG CB CRADE BR£AI< Cl/Y GUY ~RI' FOR POlf BOC BAD< OF CURB CY C>.1E VAi.YE BO BLOW ITT Blof BAA!lMR£ f'ENCE HP lftGH PCIHT lllY IN~T OF Pf>( CA TY CA!ll[ 1El£\1SIOH I' IRON Pll'E C8 CATCli BASIN S' J()IHT POlf Cl CIJRll HLCT JT J()INT TREHOi Cl CEHTERUNE lP LO'll POINT CMP CORR\JGATID MCTAl Pl'l MAX MIJWUll CO QIAN QJ1 111N llJ!lllUM COHC COMCR(T[ HJ.C. HOT IN COHTRACT °' ORClO' M.CT OHU CMRl£AD unUTY Of' llUCUlf IRON PIPE DW'J DRl'Rtl'AY PS PULL SOX Pl PROPER TY tJN£ E W:ClRIC l.»<£ re oo or C11M: EC [XJSJlNC CRAil£ [l£V El£VA'llOO P .S.E. PU9UC llll\1CE EAIDIDIT PS.0.L PRIVA!t STORll ORAIH EASOIEHT P>1 POl'<T OF >\JlllCAl IHTE'RSCC110< RCP REJll'ORCED COHCRCTE PIP£ EP EDCE OF PA\61£NT R/W lllQff OF WAY £R D«l OF M."llllN (E) DllSTllG rr flNl9< flOOR SO STa\W OR>IN Pll'E SS SANTll!Y Sl:O PIPE STll STORM ORAi< UANHOl! re f1lllSH CRAOC fli flR£ Hllll<ANT SSM1i SAllTARY SC'tltR UIJ>HOlf SP SERl4CE POU: EXISJ'ilC PRQPOSED ----CXJNTOO/l El!YATION --•--•--W"TER MAIN ('...,"'' L' , .. _, ~ • ,...,t'!!!,STORM DRA.lt4 {1-.ifl") v <'*' .ss • S•fe'SAMTARY SOCR "'..,." TOP OF 0JRB lLEVAllOH ""-" 451.~ PIP( INvtRT a.£VA~ SID S'll T 1BIJ TC TOO lCE !'fl' w ... WV HX J_jPfj Pam.AND CONCRtlt £1.(VATIO'il a @ 0 n tll.4' nOMJN( £1.[VA.nOH ;c ,....., ASPHl.LT CONCRE1E ElfVA11\)l "'...,.. TOP OF Cl!A1E El£VATIOH nr J.W.•!I roP 0-WAU.. UCVA~ -~ • @ • 801TOW OF WNJ. D..£VA llOH W:CTllrutlt fl.OW DOl(CllON ORDP NU:l UANH(ti OJRB INlCT 'l\'A'f!R Wtl<R f1R( HltllW/l '#ATl".R VAi..\{" E' ::--===~• SIOCWAIJ< -------l{RTICAL CIJRB =-====-Cl/RB le GUTTIR -------------JOINT ll!£NCli ~~--~~-R!TAIN~G WALL u -.J !l'tri(R LATERAl.. )8l TR!I TO OC REMO'<l:D STANDARD SID(WAU< Tll.EPHOHE LINE ltMPORARY 9£NCHUARI( TOP OF CURB TOP or BAH1< TOE OF BAN< TYPICAL WAffR UN( WAlCR WCTER WATE.R VJJ..\{ --- ~ &. :_., T ' j b I 1 I q> :::> a: ~-· I f :Q) l I > ~'· <t: ~Si / Ill .... _, e 1 ~ c ~ 1!:1 ""!!> 0 % ...rRE 1H£ FRI OF HA>INA & SRIJNET!l oa:s N01 PffOIU COHSll!UCllOH STAKES. >IJD TTRJ.I WLL ASSWE NO RESP()jSlillJTY ~A!SOE'o{R FOR lll?R()l,{MEJHS COHS1RUC1EO MR£TilQIA NOIE TO CONJRACTQR COHTRACTOR ACl<EES lliAl HE SHALL ASSUllE SOlf AND COHPl!Tl R£Sl>ONSIBIL!l'I FOR JO!I ~Tl CONDITIDN5 DURING n;r COURST' or ~STRUCTION or 11115 PRO.CC!, INCLUOlt<C SAffTV « •LL PIJ!SCl<S AND l'll<l'ffiTY: lllAT 11115 REOUlllOIENT !JiALL ll'Pl.Y CONTINUOUS(.Y ANO NOT llE UMITID TO HORMAl WORl(INC HOU!lS; AN{) TI<Al THE COIHTIAC!OR SljALL DEFEND, INDlllNlf'Y ANO HOO> lH( O~ER ANO lH£ ENQN[[R HARMLESS FROM ANY ANO ALL Li.BIUTY, REAL OR AlLEGCO, IN CONflECTION ,.TI< TH[ PERFORMANCE OF WORK ON lltS PflQ.fCT, ElCEPllNG FOR UAB UTY ARISING FROW TI<[ SQE NEGUGENCE OF 111( OWNER OR ENGINlER . --Al 11 R'O a-€1 ---- ... -- s 1~ 0 0 -.. '-~,·-" I -~-- ,. ElOSTING UrcJEJlCl<OUNO U1IU1£S '11£ SllOWI N Tl£lR Al'l'ROXIMATE LOCAllOllS 8A!lll CH RE!Xlm INfORMAll()O< AVAIWILE TO 1H£ EHGIHEl'R AT T1£ TillC Of PR!l'Al!ATIOH OF 1ll£5£ P\NIS, LOCATION MAY NOT HAI{ B([N l{RlftD N TltE flilll AHO NO QJARAll1D' IS wAOE AS TO T>t£ ..et\JRACY OR CO!IPlrl£N£SS OF M IHfORllA'llOO SHOV.W. lllE CDl'TRACTOR SHALL NOTn UllUTY CWPANICS AT LEAST 2 •'C*lKINC DAYS N ADVANCE OF CONSTRUCTION TO mo LOCATE Ul\IJllES. CNJ. UHDIJ!Cl<OUND SE.R•CE AlfRT (U.S."-). •T 1-800-6•2-2<44. 11 SHALL El( !HE RESPCNSlBIU'TY OF TI<£ CC>ITRACTOR TO OE1UMH£ lH£ EXISTENCE ANO LOCATION OF UTILT1€S SHOV.W OH TH£SE PLANS. NDICATID N !HE flUJ) BY LOCAllNC S£RVICES. OR EWlCNCE BY fACILffiES VISTSU: AT OR ADJAti:NT TO TI<( J08 Silt. ANY AOOITIOOA! COST ~Cl/RR£D AS A RE9.IL T OF Tll( CONTRACTOR'S FAILURE 10 l{RJFY LOCA TIOHS Of l)JSTINC UTIUTIE:S PRIOR TO llCCINlllNG Ca<STRUCTIOH SHALL BC BORNE BY 1H£ CONTRACTOR ANO IS DEDIEO INCLUllEO ANO MERaD IN 1ll£ COHTRACT UNIT PRICE. I \• 1 ~ l 0 I I (1 I\ , I "1 ,. r I PLAN l;;J liQlE;_ ADWJ~CE HOTIC'i: SHALL B[ Pfl0\10CD 10 N(JCliOORIHC PROPERTY Ow.<ERS AHi> SCHOOl.S OF IEA\'Y Ca<SlRUCT!Oll ACTI\1TIES AHO HEAVY CONSTRUCTIOO SHNJ. NOT START BEF();![ 6: JO AW 00 OA YS MN SCHOO..S ARE IN S!:S.SION. NO COHSTRtJCTlON IS All.DO!!> (I< ~A I'S. DA'Tf:: _______ !5 HANNA .t 8RUN£TTT llRNOU>R~­ RCC 17186 DCPIR£5 6 -.J0-15 BENCHMARK Tll£SE PLANS ARE e•SED DI/ nc TOWN or LOS GATOS ~CliUARK . BENCliWAAK 10: LC2• filVATIDll: l48.8J frrt CESCRIPTIOf<· SET BRASS DISI( IN UOHUMENT IO(LL STAllPCJ) \.G f2•' LOCATIOH: IH1ERS£CTIOH <J" BLOSSOM l<tl. ROAD AND CAMINO OE CERRO BASIS OF BEARINGS FLOODZONE STATEMENT ca&llflrTY PANEL NUllBER: 0601\5C0JlllH MAP llC~SD>: ~AY 18. 2009 l'RO.CCT IS LOCA TID IN Zlll<E X~ ZOl<E X50D AN AREA INUNDATED BY 500-YEAR FLOODING: AN AREA lllUNOATID OY 100-YEAR FlOOOING ,.TH A1£1lAOC DEPlllS or LESS THAN 1 FOOT OR '•l'Tll ORAll'IAOC ARl'AS lfSS TI<.AN I SOUARE Mil: OR AH AIU PROTtCTED BY lf'<l:Eli FROW 100-YEAR flOOOiHG. OWNER ro<ARDO CROUP J.19 FIRST S1RE£T lOS A!. !OS. CA 94022 ....,.TlENAROt1DMCS.COU CIVIL ENGINEER IWI<• .t IR!l£Tl1 7651 OCl..TJEIRY STRUT lllJlOY, C• 95020 Off1C[; 408 t42-217J FA~ 408 842-366? EllA/L: E.N<HIJllHCOrlANNA!JM<£ll1.COll ARCHITECT KOHLSMl .t ASSOCIATES 51 Ull'<l:RSlTY A\o{H\J( 'L' LOS CA !OS, CA 95030 OFT1<L 408 395-2~5 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT GREGORY ~S 736 PARK WAY SANTA CRUZ. CA 95065 ()ff1CE, 831 425-•747 SHEET INDEX CO~ SHErl 2 BLUEPRINT OF' A ClE.1,N BAY 3 STANDARO GRADING NOlES 4 ll£MOU110N PlAN sm: PlAN GRADING ANO O~AINACE PlAN STORM WATFR MANAGEMOIT PLAN 8 EHOSION CONlROL PLAN en c CtS -a_ <ii 2 :z 0 0 t in a: ~ u "' a: .., Q ;;/, E ~ ~ s Q $ SHEET JOB NO. 1 Q) ::i c Q) ~ OFB "'0 o"' o ... ... .._ 14075 01/l 1::5 '.!l;: 3y "'"' o..,... "'(/\ -w ...:°' a::w <Cl) o...., :!i~ ...... 50 itj zZ -< ..... 8°'-l!'tl wU ::!<( ,..., Z :i: <,_ ~ts g~ <z uw ijlO :i5 o.W :!i!!! u a~ e< :l 2 8ii "'Q. ~!!' ~ l)!F :>Ill z ~8 ..J o-' -< DI ~II\ ~~ -'0 >;: ~;s we: &:a l<IJ WQ. \QI/) ~~ !;!< "'Ill i!'z < ~[ <w !,/Vl al"' ~i! oi! ~;;; 01-"'u ~< o..>-~a o..u ~_, ~~ ,.Ill w 5 ;!: :r lJ !.!U Fi :!i~ ~[ m§ ~i! ~;;; l5ir ..,w x"' -z oB .-z c"' j!iw 2i! ~z 1;.1- I/) wz "'< -'2 -'w <a: ~I/) "'5 ~F :C< OU c::c: o-lt'~ ~Si zo <z "'< 2~ Iii[ DATE ... IE"' ~/ iii~ =>w wr:! I!';: REVISI ONS : 0R0CNANCE: Of-'Olf lOWN OF LOI G.A TOI UTA8USHING llf0U9RO-£N'T$ FOR Sl()fl:M WAT'Ef\ POl.LUTION ~Ol "' n..• "" ''fB'F"rL • CdnMt• ......... ,,.,,,, '*"°" ...nc VIOooti'\ih' w:i..s _...,. ~·~ ~ Wt Af\riC'llll; v..r: t4 gi..91 t4 •"t0a.~9l"d"'?O"lairwc:wir r..,..,(itm.t11>t. p1,,..ntlabioe"J~lr\~"1v"Wt~Jkit• ttmil'ICAtodC<M>'l••~•Ct'br •W notto ~S1000ot'1bio".n ~~ .. '*)~ (II h • A._-.df ,,,...... ~·""'" • ffPlllWI• off.nw E''91')' dllfMCl'l M.cto~ CO"!'""°''°' tNif\N WI ~~oft•'lM B ~ •.l'tf ,..,_, wro ••ch~ ,,,.., •P~~~ ..,.....0tr.o.u~nlll'*'• ~., ... f!'l>~-0 ..... 'Yt. ..... "' ~-ot.,-.)V\1-.....nd~l .. <'fd\-J;hai,M c."'*> 11.til-'° tne lOWN ~LOS GAlOS .,, 11 '"'" t'loe'I to ·~ &2,00"~ Mf a.,,..,.,.~ rJ.tt .,.. wttoG'• at."1o4t11flloctu't "10ll~>!f\~~tm0'.A11 01 suo. -itte, tt.. .:oun srt.n ~<I.., p'«>f O' •uc.:h IMlttll H ~ mt, ~e $.1.ibM~" c• 1 ... 1.0 vkliiil~. Wtv.h .,... Ml COft'Wnl~ C'11'1!~ottnM!U tly¥111'1hrdie!¥11')'&'1!0f\V...ll t18 w·utt<I u MPni. c.&lM Cit'"~ ar.c:i ""'11 tit M4~ le • t~ a·NMOOI o • ...,.,. C ~ .\llJ ~.on wn:-v!Oi.f,... .el\1 ~of fltt N\lc:l4 u.I be Cl ..... f ~ !4 tMI TI'JWN ~ lOS Go\TOS lot •f ~--.·i 1-.:~ ·~• Ifft as·~ct.:I wMt It• uwesilgl!"'l:ll'\ fflbf~ #'Id ~ 01 •l'IYtoninMtal cond:LoN uut.C-Ctr~ ~'9• d O?(:.t•""• "° Plt:~MOn!O!'aln •t•liMl fll•~l~O.. ..... .., ~ofr..t•..ae D Rf.ndtn Cwmff.Uh!:, The I~ p.-o-rotd 17 ......... J..n,,o.~o..ornule·.-.~ ... ,~ ...... , .. ....a .,.,, ci.., ..:k!Jbooito •IT)' 9"00 .. th'1 f.mt~J .,,,..._ 10 ho lCWN ()ii t.0C C" ~ OC. ""'°"' "*-.,,. _ ,_ fOla Ho 1 ... 0 ,, »•.» Urban Runoff Pollutlon In ,,,.. Sonia O•ra Valley storm ora"" low directly to local cmeks and Sao Francisco Say -with no treatment Urb811 n.moff pollution Is a serious problem for wiidlH'e c.tependlng on our watenvays and tor t flfl' peop~ who llve near streams or bayland s Some common -$oorces of ulben runof1 pollution Include sp~lec ull, f uel and Olhru flulOt. rrom vehicles and heavy equ1pmen1 con\l1uct1on deb<ls and other usod mate rlats sucn as pa~t concrete , and soil Thirteen valley cille• n;i...., Joined toge ther Wlln Sanla Oara COu"ty and Santa Clara Valley Wate< Ols~ict 10 educaie and engoge IOcal residents end businesses In prevenllng utban runo ff pol lt~ion ~ flope you wi u )Om "' by using tile orectJCes d•Wibed .... ro Splll Response Agencies Olol M ·I Santa C&ara VM .. r W1t•t Oi11J1C"I Environm.ntet Colnf)llanc• Dwtt lOn ~O<wlit~l';t'H\ (4(){.)76!>-160') S.nll Clir• C°"nty ~vtfonn•nla l HttallhS.Me.. ("'Cf'>i'C<fl"50!? For more lnform1t1on on rtl•l~ toplcJ,contJict agtl'\C!H ll11td _, a.nu Clara C~ HoUfo•hOld Hull"dout We•t• 'roor.m fACilJ W.;,lOQ Sant.I CIU• County omc:. ol To.X.. •nd Sold Wht• M.n....-mtne l40f!l oM '.\tl;r$ Sent.I C'-ta Covnc1 A.eyeing "OCll°' (t!OOl ~)-641'4 .SnJoetilhtQ Q1ni Wltw P~ Con4rol """ (4",ltt) V'5-63'XI ~(~~llM;cM,~ ~ .. 5-S...-. ~.'U (W•.$ ........ 5wM cw. ¥tilt)' Uf'IMn Ruttott ,.ofMton "'~'°" Pfo9ratn /t'V,"'1}7q.a...?4&:: DESCRIPTION BY: -----. ,_ _______ - Blueprint for a C l ean Bay Best Management Practices for Construction Activities l. ~ w~ . ~ -r I t J " l ~• t• I " .. , ..;. ... · ., I ,· ~, r , ' ' t .,J.. ~.; I , •. "'"· ...... v.,1~ • \., ,... 'r ~':,! • " .. _ ,!_, . ~.. . '2;' ~'~.th· ~ ' "'~. \ ~ ..... 'Y "' .......... ~·:...·.~ .... , ' .. >~~~"~ I L General Construction a n d Site Su pe rvi sion Fresh Concrete and M ortar Application Painting and Application of Solvents and Adhesives Ad"•nc:ed P'8nnfng ':J Sd'Mich.i .. eJ1CeVahO"I a nd 9f"adlnQ a C'fJ'f'tbH for Of'f _,,.,. pe!lO(K J P-.n water''°"""' a~ n.:noff actc>s'S alte s.o u. 10 reovce r'l'I01ft1fN'flt0'&011 es~ duling ea.c:a.atJOO J tnln and 1ntonn e mpiovfes on stormwater fe<tuiremellts. tJ Inform subCOnvectors. !D!>YI O.eir responslbtl11y 10 IOllOW s1orm wa1 et reouheme mi '.J O.algn.-t.• ari tr•iit •way rr°''' e<eek.1 end •lorm drain •rtlets tor a u10 pari<1og .-enk:l e rah ... l·no aod ro1,1t ine wu1ptT1e nt t'\lttnt e:naoce a p,-.p are, rn3inta1f' and 1mptem&nl a site 1pe~11c Grao1ng, Eros.Ion end S60io1ent Controt Plan U Provki• p('()()f of N Oi tlhr..; (lo RWOCB) ...,.'hicn tnch>OPB a •lie apecif1c SWPPP, It "'°"' tnari .r; acres Cl land 1$ Oflh,HbeO !total 3 11 phae..s) Ad"•nced Pfann•ngf HouHkttplng ..J lrain •-,cf lntorm emr i.,~u 0 " stormwa1e1 rBOuir~~t.' !J OHfgnat e an aree: a"a~ 'f"C''TI oettk1 Mia tto.m ruam 1~ts Co)l" equ.pment washmg ..., Otapose m1nW2te1s '"to a d•n a1ea or c.aplurl! '°' rety01ng ex 011-sne di sposa' t.J O.algnata a n a1ea aw•y 'r::>T ctee'-s ilr'Kl s1orm dr am irJe1s '"''' me1E"1.'ll ano waste t1tnragt> J Protect ca\ch bn.10 1n4ete and c1 C&k a lrom runoff conta1n1ng ooncre1e fe.s1dt1e and fine .sediment Cons•der u'e or a labnc mesr lo cal.ch fmc t•ll~ :i A•P•lr e cw1pmeot off-sitt .J Never dispose of ~shout water mtn !tte,1 gLrtter slcrn drR1n d (111na0@ drtch or creek Ao"anced P••"ntng u Train ena •ofotm empl~ un .iormvw.t&t reov 1ements J Inform 51Jbc::of\tr1N;fcx. AbQut therr resp:ns•bi1rtv ·~ fotf.ow ¥lwmwale1 h:tqu1 emeulS J Oe1lgnate a rl area away "rcrn creeks. and stonTI drain ·nitts tor melenal a.no waste !'ilor.1Qe ..J O.algnate en area away from Cl~$ ar\(j l\IO•m dr1'in t"''rts fm mixing paint& 211(1 cle-a rnl'ltti equipm•n' .J Con .. l n or d t-1•1'1 wate• u~ 'Ot" paint P'f9DellHIOn .awty hU TI the streel. piJtter storm dr.am and creek J Store and use a ~ hqu•d PiMt oro<iuct.s awil.~ from the stree\. O\•tfe t 61Dfm ci1ain ~no Cftoe"' ..l Provide ttghHtfboQ lids and t llCOndMV con\A nrnent il'Jo' pa nt,. sofve1l'~ trnnnef!> giue..•tc Spectal Note A s a conttaclor. site supervisor . owner or operator of a site, you may be responsible for any environmental damage caused by your subeontractors OI employees DATE:_~Y~ HORlZ. SCALE: ~Na=~--1 VERT . SCALE.1"""'----1 DESlGNED BY:_,A,,,_w,_ ___ I REFERENCES ~UHMJ~ng .J 0Hhl"•le a ., a ritr away ttQtT ~~g end storm dt~lf\ 10~1• tor ma1~f 1Wld" "'""""tie 1tortl.Ot' .J eo ... ., Ol'es o1 eoi• •nc> Olhl'1 con.sHllC'(\()I'\ mett"11ais ouo .,_, •nddl:f~r9fn Q CoYtr and mafotalU Oumpt:ten: M1N""Zft l+ltor ;ro1111011te J Pro..,kle 1econOery eorttanrnent 'Ot )(lfvetil\. paints rt-hide fkftd~ eitc ~ M oilntam p(M'18h~ IOUftl• ahd eneck heQuenlly lor l<eakt U Re.pair !QUlPTlf'Mf ott 11\(' u C IHn-up •1f)lll5 ftM le.-h 1m,,..eo1"t:ftly u•u n•., ct•v metflOds - lJ OlspoH or .ti! wiutes Pl'OP4Hly 1ecv:12ble nazardoos garbage u Neyer noae aown to clun p:ivemenl or orhtlr aurfa~~ 0 Ntvtr bury Of "ave WS.!-l& mateni'IS m 1ttee1~ outteirs er f're3t Ctff:k 5' Dt.trtl"g Conetru c:tk>n o Mh ""'Y •moun• of treYt coocrl"'lt o. ~r ~,,,., ,..,.. ,,. used Ml ft d8)' Q V&e tatps c· hea'" f)ta!-nc 0'oP doll'\~ u1oc1 !''11:. mncers. r3nd G("le r eQ\llPf'T\frit .J Cofl.ct and C11Sp0!e cf a ll WCIS'tt'~ an-tt e•ce ss Jnale'tal' OfOON~ '~tdabte naU'O-::Js ~art>ag:c .....J Protect ma1e1~h. f 101n wino -1 Cov•r ~ntl mtml.6 11 dumps1e,-,. Mm1m1ze l1th'1 ;uovne' S!IC _, c1 .. n .u p 11pill~ ana 1ee>.s; 1mmeoietely U.i·•~ dry me\f1oat J N •Y•r ellow llUtl') o ru lOf'! r ror., uw a .ttt'lQ In teach tJJ ~l@f O(Ofm d f81f"i _, Never ix.ry o • aa;e waste ma(enals •n sttee\s ouneu o• r.ea r ~t's Ctit1nUp ~ Cov~r al mtit~'dl! fl'V to e r.ct ..J Cl ean up $91lt'\ .a rc 'e~kfl tff.,->&dia\•''\o Oll 10 di f J Oispou of all war.1~5 Dfoottfy • re<yiJ11ble naz~100L11 ~oa.oe :..J Never ho.5e' OO#f\ 10 Clef!., pay~~ot or 01tie1 autfar P& U Never C<ean bNSheJ. or eq;.. pmP ,. ' the a1rf'e1 guoe , storm ora111 or crl!'('• U Nt'Yer pour ~olw:nu. wun WtUlotl O' O(hr\:r l1u111dt It) the stree~ gutter "Of'"' 0'1Jiri 01 crtt•. .....J Never bury 01 leave wasto m•1911et'" ~r. street~ Qvtte1s .,,.r near creell.s Road W o rk and Paving Operation s Earth -Moving Activities Heavy Equipment Operation Ad1tonced P .. nnlng .J Sc.h.clllffll t~-c.eV9t•::r at\t1 grat.t.09 iiK'tMh,.... t ,. o ry WH~tler .J lra\n 81"1C 1n•o~r-fTll'Uioyf!oe) on slOf'T'llfl'I •~ 1eqo1t..,~"1a u tnfo rm St.tbe0'1tf~-.. oo al>0\11 'f"Je"ll'l ~f)Of'.1'1Q..ttytofol1"'.>W stom1wo1er rec:i.u1re...,._f'ft5 J 0..19n•t1 .n 1rt:a I W1rt rrom ~· aoa 11orn Of'arf'l 1n1et~ to1 auto oart1ng vel'l1cie rah.,.hM9 e nd rout1rie eau1Pf'l'le:nt If'•" nterUtni"e J Prep•,.. na•nt"" •ii.a Hnptcn\Onl 8 !1 Erosr°'1 f11-:> St>dl m~nt Con1,n1 Pjlf'I for emtiarikment' u Pf'OYtd• MG()ncte')• r.onia1nrne•u lot ,f'.')l...,nla pa1ntS, vehde flu1d1 , etc J Cov1r or ~Al Clltcl'I t>iiiun~ ario mantiole~ v....,1·e app1vmu St!~ ~I sh;rt", SN too SU etc A d111ulu<I Plaon4nliJ ..a StMdule e "t.#vatiDl'l and greo.ng 1)1"'\1\lft'ft'\ 'Q· "" wealhfi~ pe ·-=~~ J lfain A !'':' r •(lr"T' ~J. ~, Jlonf", .. e'• rt:'1U• .,.Ui.l"I> .J Des•g l'lalt ,f'l 1111te1' a""''3'f fr\,nl ,~~s a"d ir.11·•tr OrP ""' t11~\5 •01 1utc pa rlt", veh>Cle: •""f~t"tgal"C t')\..t"'" eQ 1omrri1 m~' '"'-'1anc.:e J R epair "llUl~~t off s•\e .J P~p.&u~ n",.,,.l;:tm 1111-J hnpieriiMI a tt·i'l SpP<.lf!C Grad.nJ Fu S10. 1r.a Sodl!'"'f'!'' :o· 'tD' P'Bl"' .J Provlct<r f'•l'IC'' Col NQ1 !1~t"IQ f\O RWOCG> wt111..'1 lnClvdC!t ll site $P'!(:d: SW"PP U l'OO'~ tr.an ! ttr•fs. 0 1 1ann '' o~turnec '\.ota• al i p•1 e~es) HouMke.ptng ....1 Avoid exoeu Oos:! wt1eo nru":1ng asph&!t o · conctete ..J Avoid over....,..a!ering during GIA: OOf'l\fol ooeraUon1. ...J Cover stoet:oi'es "nor IO and dunu~rl'ln ..J Shovel o r vacuum saw--cU1 s lurry Keepmg reSldtJft fro..., Pnrenno fiow •ri es celtn basins and creel(. .J Clnn.up SJ>lls aoo leal.s 1mmediatel; using ·aty 1neth0ds • ..J F\emo ve and rhspose ot a 1 wutes propetty ~ reeyclaojc na.zardou&, o~rbage ..J Oo not UH 0 1esel ~I es a h.tbncanl ..J Never wnh exc.ess msten~I •rom equipment. e.tPC£ed aggreoale concrete o r sunilar tr eatments !nto a street gvtter storm drai n oc creelc- -' Never f\05.e to dean up mud Ql(\lf~6 Ounng Const ruction -' Protect e,(tS.t.'flg trees ind vevel8tl0f"I Remele ~ w1"13l IS neQ6"31') .J Prot..ct eaten baS\fir 1n6eu. ~n~ CfP !'!b f•om uooff Cc"'lS\del uu era ratnc mesh to catt.n '''*' $(;(S J Divert wa1e· ltaw ana runo- aaoss Me :so 21s lo retluce mo;remenl of s0tl ....J Plant 1empnrat) vegeunu .. m ear 1. e"-pec:•ally m exposec: j'ljreas f\ot sdiedu:ed' tor 1mmPd1ate const1uct1on -' 1n1lall eroS1on end s!d lm~Ml controls oefore :t nuns .J Cover p:!es of so.• .. nd olher consuuc11or. m ateoal8 pr ior lo I C::. ~IC ~~~~f!l~ ~~no~=~~~· :~':,~r~G;:a~,~~\:~lt.~ I CO. 'L lf":i .:11!01-. L' ""· .t•fl• !fl .JU .. fl).,.....,. 0!'10 Qll'•:Jtftg 4'¢',. • IJ • .........,., '{Ji #•~ C"'lt Qr.SC~':' ••"D' a udOJ ".:.t·U~wt • f,~ lWI"''" ~,. o· W..a a tl'9\".QIVV'J\.!lfo'Ql'C "C!r--1" •-··aoi•-.-.,. #... •-~' ·• r .. ~:. .. -. •• ,.. •• "'"' .... ,,..... .... .81 ........ ~"'-·~~.~ ...... f't1 •,..!,. l\dYanteCI P11nnm9 J Trai n 1NI .nft.ltrr ,.,..p..oyees; on 1w.mwa\A ' rt'JU.f~n~ J 1nf onn ~t>C"~"Vfl('Jf'n el)OUl tt'lt• f~91t1tlt\y le *::ittnw ttOfMw•te1 f'~U•"('\"'~~ .J Otslgnttt en are.a l'l\'l'f trOl"l now hoes c1 eek& .ano stonn dram K'tle1$ fci< ve ~~ f'1'° pqlJIP""MI (.:11i ~t"1Q 8nd rt-fue41nQ J Prov1cte e ' ~11.,11t1 tOCA tion !Of f'llilJOI eq ... ;.vnen t •epan ar10 m.111nt~~D ·lC"~ ...J Provide regul;:ir nuun1en&CI'! tt .. a1t equ1pme n• Cnec--. beQUC"nU'J' tor 1~,..,, .J Provide $!C01ldit't ronta1f\r11tnl fur JoNent~ painl~ vf!hde llUtOt elc ..J 01!1C)OH' Ot ~If WHIA'i ""'~rtv rec.clable "1a1e·doo! g11rt>:tse .J Do not use o•es!f Ot' n a lubocanl Hou.ukHplng J U~ dnp P&f\$ aod'Of Ol'Dt' ctot.•G ¥.'f'l"e conoucti-flg Rldtf'll!'O&rlte ad1YJ1ie5 j Cover ea..11pmem and matt!m1ls oner to and 0 1.1n ... g Jatrl ..J CoYer and rtamtam dumpsters Mm•m1ze ~er around sf:e ..J Collect and con1 a1n a!I !"p!_- fii.Jtd~ 10 separa!e COrltamer~ with 119ht ilfhng hds. _, Clean-up spills anc le<>~s 1mmecha1e.y using ·oty methods J Nttver wasn excess matf"l!al from equipment mtO a street or storm drain ~nle:.. _) Never d ean equ1prnet'l1 ovei • eaten oesm ro le{ J Nev er t>ory oc leave was re mete111us tn s treets. guhe!s o· neat cr-eet;;s -t 1,..s rriafe'\tl.t ao~rtt• .. • l"r ~~ o.-.. .,...., """-'-~"'-~ SHEET B lueprin t of a C lean Bay 2 OF 8 CHECKED BY: -----t TOW!' OF LOS G A TOS l--------·I F£BRU ARY 2015 15975 Union Avenue -apn 523-42-017 SA N TA CLARA COUNTY JOBNO. CALI F ORl'U 14075 DRAWN BY:_ TM TOWN OF LOS G.UQS STANQARQ GBAQ!NG NQTES 1. "It .,...oc11 W it oootorm to Chapte1 t 2 ol tho 1 own 01 Los Ge10S Grading 0.d'1>aN:O, loo -pied Cal'°'"'" lluil<llng Code al1d tno lalt>l oditon ol tne Stenctaltl Spe«adk>os tor Pwbk WorU Construc110n .,,~ .u apec:J'ieo ~ on th•H pians and de1alts 2. No work may~ started ~site wilhou1 a" apptoved Gt10if10 P~ end a Gr~ P9fm11 Issued by I/le TO\oW'I °'Los Gatos. PtA>!fo WOfk$ Oepartmcnl loc.3tod Oil 41 Milo' A~•. Loa Gatos. CA 95030 3 A Pre.Job moe1 •ng sl>aP be tltld w'~h lh• T0"'1 Eng;noonng -"' uom !he Depa"""'"' ol Palko and PW!ic w .... prio< IO any ..... be#lg do .... The Conuact0t "'6tJ ca'l 1hc anspoc:&ons l.ine at 408.399.sn1 t.1 lt&S.1 48 hours P"Of" to 111)' grdng or o.'*lo 'WO(\.. The meetlf'IQ t~ inck.IOe (f, A. dlllalSlfon ol lhe ~Ol:let oond1llOl'll al approval, ~ hoUrl, tit• ntalnltnance and onun c.onstructiOn menefl.; D A.Gkno'lrl1!'Klgemenl in """illnQ thOI Contractor eod A.pplk:ant ha\'O read a!W unctcw11Dnd tho p<o;.ct cordllons of app<oved, and w11J nia"-o coritir\ tkal al p 1qeci sub·c:onl.roao~ huvc 1und end underMand 9tl9ITl pnor 10 c:onwnendng ~ •nd th11 a c.opr °' 1ho ptCllfK1 c::ono.:x:w. ol ~al w!U be po£Nd on sOt a1 at Ume& """'°..,..,..,,.,., 4, Approval of plnns doH no1 tekM!l5t the c»telope-1 or lho fosp:>nsbiliry fol the coutctKH'I of m~11kn, otrors. or omksioos cornainld lhweln. It. during the tourM ol construeltotl of t '°ie imprOlle'T\en\s, ~ •~e.est onct snloiy requite s a modification or OOplnute trom mo l ~ Spec:mc:allons 01 l~ ~owmenl plaOS. the 1 O'M'l E_ngineiet V.a• ~Vlt hJI 8UttlOrUy lo requite auch moohc:at.cn o r dapaf'tLlre ano k> .q)OC:ify !he mlf'll"* in which IPte '"1mt is to bo INOO. 5 ~·' ol 1"• plan aoplie• only 10 Ille ~mdlng. excava1lon, ~merll, and~ Of natural eann ma1of.at5. lln appioval uoes no1 confer anr rights ot tolry to eilMf public ~Y 01 the private property ol 04t-,e,. and do&a not ~/tuto app<ov111 or at"ly olNir mpro~mf'nls 6 bcevaltO ~ual sha8 be paud m lhe II• ar.as dltrO"'ll*I Of 1ha1I be Muted IJW'IY 1:rom the siM. to be dl.spoHd" al apo;CMMI ~tloo(s] 7 a snan be tM respond>il!ty ot Che Pe~e or ContrK10f to IOef'l&lly. localo and ptnted all underground faci!Ms . Per!Nttff Ot ConttaCIOf t.hal nolify USA {VncSMQrourlCI SeMeo Alel'O a1 l ·800·i21·2600 1 m inimum o! 48 "'°"''but not Ol()r(I man 14 dDys pOO< to comm~ All woril 8 . A.11 g1ad1ng sMJI bo perlor med if\ 5Ueh • moMl!f as to COM'pty w.lh lhe :ttal'datds teLab hhed by the ~r Ou1t~1V Ma~! ~lrict lot ai1bc>lnrt parllculA1ns., 9. The Contrac:10r $ha!I COIT1lft' "'1th At 10cal, s.taie ~~al '&WU, CO<les, Nies and rfOA11kW11 Q0"'8 r11ing tno 'l'I04'k ben1Hied on lhHo ~ns T ~ shal induele . """°"' tmiuUion. Alotr and Ma.'th rulot ....S re g11lallons estabhhod tJy « purwant to tno OcoupaiionaJ sa~ •no Heantt N:J. or any atf'lf!r epptic&b'e p.&>ic •ulnorllt 10. The Ge<l*ral Conlmdor shaA provide quaWled supcrvl"'..lon on tho job :olte :111 all trMf during conslruc:tion 1 1 HoM:ontal ard ¥tfl.Cal co1,j.rofs thmM bt ael and ~114 by a bnsod S\lfWVOI Of regi:Mored ~ enQ!net r et.a;hea 10 ~ tlrn"ld WMt)'ll\Q, lorlhOiallowlng..,.,.: a. RoWrVng wa#-IOp of we• ~ns and tocat'°"' (el W&tk lo be permlf1Cd 1oparate~ •nd AQl)fled ICH at 1he l own 01 Los. Ga\0$ BuHdlng ll<>pertmenl ). b. Too ones 50p or a.rt and 1111 slope s 12.Pnor 10 &Wlneftol arry permk,lhe as)plicar(s soils onotnH'f shall nMeW !ho Hnat g 1adlfto lr.d ~e plar4 to GfllUfe ttll.I dnigf\S lot k>unda1ion1., retaining watts, &ito gtedJIQ. and SdC drainlgl 11e "' acooroano. wttJ\ the.tr recomtoonoatlons ard the Pftt rt"'At'"' ccmments. The app(iant's soils ·~·, approval dial thon be convoyed 10 the Town elll\ar bV 16tt111"' by slg,;"l) lhO plans SoiliS EnginHr l<IUot No.---~ da.,.. 20 _, .... bo lhO<ougl!b comphed wtrtl 8ofh !he m ~one«S report ¥1d al updal~ll•Oderdumsllellc~ lt<C her'eby appended ar-.;S rnede a parl ol t M grodtng plan. 13 Durling ton$11'\iCtiOn, 11t exc.ava1kwlt and oradl no snail be ~cc:sby tho applleartt' s.oik engineer. Tf'lt Cf'Vlneet sha.U bo no~kld at 1eost 48 hcM$ belcve ~any giacfong The ~r Sllal be......,. 10 ...my Oho> tf'9 ldual '°nOIUom a1c as anhol)t'• In th& oe.siign•-' ~ectinica.I ~ atWof' prowse approptial6 Cl'iOQN kJ the report 1ecotnrr.endalions. as 090ll5sary At! ooo~rwe<! andlorunapprovod "~shall be reokJved and r ~aced under soils engineer observanc1 (the Town lnapeclo, 1hali De made awa•e ol any requltOd enenpos prior 10 work be<ng P"rl<>•"*'I· 14. l he retutla ol lhll ~·on ot>Gervet.on and IOS\lng shoo~~ Clocutnenled in ar\ -a~-buttt• \oner/repot1 prepa r ~ by thO appl.ants' fnlls enolntef Md submitted '°' I~ Town 's fNlttW And ecceplance be I Of a f~I re!Hae ol My occupancy pormk is gran1ed 1 S All ptW;ue and pubk: •ltMta aa-U1ng P~ Sfte sN# be !l ope°'*' ano In a Hie, ctm. .. abte condiiion tn<oughout consttuChOO 0 temp:Har)' C~Vt• is l"IMded . then lotrn.IJ written notice IO 1hl ad,lacent r~ and 1he Town of Los Ga101 Public WOtks Oepanment 'StlaM be provtaco at teast one wOOll in edvanco ~ do&u1e and oo obiurc shat! be or1n!ed Ytil hout the express wrinttn •l"Pfov.el of thfl T OWt"I No m.)terial or ~.el\t ah.Ill be slored In the JM>ic orpnva10 f10ht·ol·Will y. 16 Tht convlleilor Wll iNtAI 1nd malrnin fffc!.1., ban•,s. ~ ano Mor- ltiJt art ~ry to CJYO 1dequ8'e waining 1ndlprot0ci1on 10 ft~ atdtimos . 17.o..<itt/Aol>lcanl . -------------""°""' 18 Gonot'GI Contrxso1 (h avaJ&able) --------Phona 19 GradlOg Contraoct (I a• ... ble) -------Phone. Building Driveway/Parking • eoo:1968± CVExpot1 :1175± cut 300±c.y. cut 190±c.y. b F~·.19:fr__cv""'°"'.Jr fill 25± c .y. fil l 25:t c.y. 20. 21 Wllct Shall be av.a&bll on Che she II al fwnM dU:linQ Cill'3dln0 operal!Oftt to property maintain d!At tofttrol 22.This p&an <toes. no~ approve lhe remc.wal <JI t1vov.. Apptopn.ale "" fft'I0\11! pem'lt and metho09 of lfH pretotvation ahal be fequired. Tree Removal Permit& tun 1oqulr1.1d prior 10 the tipproval 01 a11 p&ans. 23.ATown EriCroacbm.Ml!PemMl Is required lor eny\l!Ok wiltw'I the publiG ng?M-of-way. A Swt• E.ncn>ldlmenl Ptimll ll. ftlQ\Hted f0t ary ..,.°"" wtlNn Sl•te fiOht -ol·war Qr ~l The Pernvtlte 1Jfld"ot C'omrRIOI &t1111 be ruponilb6e c:oortt l\iltlng (Mpnctlon pel'lorrned tr; olhtf gow:mmeo1a1 -· 24 No CtQH lot draln:igo will bO ~rmllled withOvl Jll•Sftctory slorni wtiWr a.oi:epWlee deedlfacililn . All dr1uN1.ge 1hal1 be d lfectl."CI k> lhe tlrett1 or MM# acoopiab'e Orill~ rat.i!rty via a oon-erot.lve metnoo as appro"IC by lht 1own EnglnN1. 25 t4 1!i lht 1esponslt:Jiljty ol eotltractor and/Or O'NMI 10 m111ke N.ire that a~ dn1 ll'a<*ed Qo 1he public rt;tlt·ot•way ig doanod up on Z1 do:lily basis Mvd, $l, conc:rece 800 OINt con.llruct.on debflS SHALL NOT be wasned Imo 1he T own"I stonn drains ~ Good houselweping PfllcttQU shel oe ob11rvea al •D 1wnes dllriog ttlie OOUfM ol consJruction Supedntencter.ce ot co1utrucUon st\311 be dibgonctv peftomt1d by a po..on °' penrort s auchorized to dQ so nt aft tlmO$ dunno worli.+ng houri. The storing ot goods and101 ntaleria.11 on UID c~ewalk and/or lhe WOCI IM~ not bO allowed untess t1 .,edat ~nnh ~ lsaued by 1no EnglnH<ing Oiv>s>on T11< adjocenl p..Cic nghl·ol.,..y shd be <•Pl di.I.., of.al ;ot> reiateddin 1"1:tdeb11s at !he tnd l)f !he Oly. FaJtufeto mMM11 She ~ nor.·Of·way AOC:Otd;ng to tttJ. COOOitSon may res.uh ~ thO T ~wn C*fOM11nQ lhe •eqvited ~nco •I tre dcvelopet'5 --· 27 G1B<lng Sl'latl be undtrttken tn .ctOJdanoe with C()r'Wjlll()ns end requirernenta ot the ptoJoci Storm Waler Potlutlon Control Pta n and/or Stof'm Water PoltutM>n Pt9ven1 lon Plan, the Town ol Los Gem S1orm W•»t Quality Managernena P1ogr1m, N&hONI POluiant Oischa1go Et.rrun1ti,., Splem (NPOES~ and any oltJer pam.ittJ~femt:nl-J M uld oy the SLaac ot Catitomlo Roglonot Wetei 0.,,aflly Con1rot Bo1rt1. Pt11m (ll'ICl.Jd rig IA updates) •MIU tM on&AA 111 alf timoc No dtr.a ~°"" WllOf disct\atgH from dave'ropmen1 Wil be aloM<S Of'lto Town streets or onl() lho pubkc stmm diam syltam w.1hout UetUmenl by an approvAd tlnfm wa~o' poMUllon provcndon de'ke Of other epproved mediods Mlinltnance ol privlle "omi water pollu"°'1 prnvenhon devices thal t>e the mi. ~ ol lhe owner Olschar~ or eonnodion withoul 11.aunerit by an OClPJOYOd W aoequate.)' ope1.a\lll0 M::>f m wa.\e 1 J)Otlul~m p11Wtnlon drttc.e or ovw1 IPP'OYeO mekw'Kf st\11 be cons:de1ed a \lk:>l.aUOl'I o( ltle abovt retertnte<I pemWI and tho l own ot Los Gato& S1orrnwate, OfQnaooe. Landscaping cut1336± c .y . fill 214± c .y. Off-site cut 142± c.y. fill 4n± c.y. NPDESNOTES 1. Sedimont from areas dislurbod by construc\ioo shall be retained on slle usino st~ural controls as f&qUtred by tho statewide Genera.I Cons1ructfan Stormwater PemUt, 2: StockpMes of ~ s~u be Pfopeftt COOlalnecf 10 mintrnize sedrmen1 uanspon f rom tne stte to f.lrffts. d tainage fa ohtJO~ Of acfpcen1 pnx>etllcs via runoH, vehido trac:kiflA, or iwmd as reauh'e<I by the sratowioe GeneraJ Consrfl.ICtion Stormwator Pennit, 3. Approprtate BMPs lor construcilon·rela!ea ma!ariats, was1us. spill Of' res1des shah be lm~meoted to minimize tra nsport from lhe &fto to &lfeets , ci'a1111gt l aQ,bes, 01 a~~,Jno PfOpetty by wind Of n.ino11 as. required bv tho c1.1talilfide Gene:t01 Con!>lructiorl Stonrwater Pilfrm. 4. Runoff lrom equipmenl anct vehicle wastw'IQ 1han bt contarieo el oonsl ructlon sites aria must not bO disc:ha tOf!d to r9Cfllivlng waters 01 to tho local s1orm drnin 1yatern S.. All construction oontra!;!Gr and suboon l ractor peraonnel are 10 be ma.de aware Of thQ r~QUired be&I man~ement practtce and good hO\.lsetltcplng measures tor the Pf"~ srte and any assooated COl'lltl\IC\.'°'1 6111Qino area?> 6 Al the end of e ach Oily ot conslruction actMl)I' 41 coostructton debns and was1e maianals shall be collec!ed and properly dlsposod on 1...i. "' rocydo bins 7. ConstrucUon sit~ sha ll be mstnta•ned In such a condilton that a sotorm does no1 carry WaS1o s or po#utsnls oll t he alle. Discharges uf maiorial other tflBO sroonwale( lnonstormwuler discnarvosl are P<ol>iblted eacept u au111oru:ed by an Individual NPOES P<t"INI or the state'MOG General Construction SU>rmwater Perm11 Po1on11a1 polutants include b<lt are not irnited lo: solld or llQu<l chet!!ocat spllo: waste• from p.11nls. sta.M, saalant.J, tofventS. deJefgo nts, g Ws, lime, peshC!des, hert:Jlades. tenH.ze1s, wood P«?set\fatives .e nd asbestos libers, pa1n1 !lakes "' SIUCCO 11aoments. fuels; oUa, lubocanls, and hydtaulic, radiator 0< battery l lvids; concre1e and related cutt~ or curing 1esidues: l loalab'o wastes: wastes lrom engine/equ1pmM I 61oam deamng nr d 1emlcal cSegreatlng: wastes l rom rt1roe1 cleaning; and supcfctMHinated potable wator from lino nushinQ and 1.nung . Ounng constNCtOn, disposal OI such m aleriats l'lOUk:t OCCUf 11\ a specified and ~tro~ed liemJ)Oraty area Ott-$.lle physcaf'V septaratOd ftom potenhal slOfmwater f\#lOH, witn ullimat e diSposat 1n accord3nce wtth loca~ 11ate and focui ra! requ&te"1enls 8 DtscharglOQ con1am1narect (J!Ounowater proctuooo by dewatering g1oundwater •hal has 1nt11ttaled into lhe conslludlon s-.e tS prohibited Dtschargfng of contamin11ed soils via surface e<~on is also pfohlb1ted. Oisch;uging non-contamlna.ted groundwater produced by dowatoring acll~\les requ;..es a Natlona! Pollutant DlschArge E .. mina~on ~~m (NPO ES) permit f rtlf11 tho respeciive Sla:e R09mal Wale< Oual•y Conlrol la\l \ff'd11.U:d , 8118/20 1 1 Standard Grading Notes 15975 Union Avenue -apn 523 -42-017 3 OF 8 §~.---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ~g a~ ~~ ~t3 ..:"' o:w <Ul "-w o:I o>-..,.._ 50 its ?;~ ct ~~ wU :>< >-w ~FE ~~ z ~t5 <z ~~ i I _ _L_ .. __ _,,, __ !.-"'·;, ~~ ~~~----- z < O"-t < §~ 1 ., existing utility pole B I 'o s s :O m -,--,_;-----1---1--"'-_ ~-=-· ---_-,1:,':,~~,~--=-" o:Q. 0. "-'-~ . llJ w ---=---•: ,,,~·-·.;.···; -I ·"" ' ' :'.,' J ! )• --'--'---H I I / Rood · --existing-utilfy"pote ---- . -('.~ ~t ;:i;a~~~ .. ------ r\7000 \. --s - • <t:I) • ,,t.e ,. -""' -·. .-, I . =~!------------------------------­.,, ... ;:;a ~ j :,. , -="" "i.-' ' 11699 •1 aea , .*}~ r ~~ O ":79 r 0 1 1712 11 107 :>Ill z r o ."11 80 '- •171 7 f~71S ex isti ng trees to be iernoved typical exisiing fence ,,..,. 0 ,, ... existing lrees. '"" ~~ ~i 8~ t:Vl ~z -'O >-F ~~ ~~ o.U x w wa. !!!"' .._Cl oz lll"" wf/l j!:~ z .., OQ. F <w UVl :::i w gii!' a. cI z>-"'~ a,_ Tract no. 8899 685 M 36 -37 ~~ fi~~ g:3 w ~~ ----------------------------~ D I I ' <I> :::i c: <I> 1 > ,. c: 0 c: I I \( n n1 .. ,1125 Q I 117li ·Ex1st1ng 60~ red wood tree'to re main · •1773 0 \ "'" 0 by ot hers' 0 •11>11 . . ' . ~ ' •172&0 f1729(1 ~' "'""'"•.W """ existing gas & electric 1'"--~­,,,,,0 meters to be removed I •1me . ¢ J./."" -....:......:::.~ ,11730. ~ -'. ;' to be re ~ov~J_ "'"' ~· 1'131" "™ 0 existing house ·to be removed· • o I _Jt~-~ \. ·-f17f 2 ' ___ J ~ I f17All t 11..S . -~ .... - 111« ••• i" .-:;._,_,,-. ,_ 11752 . 0 '"'' to be remov ed 1ypiea1 o .. .,, existi ng shed -,-, .. , -to-be r~moved "") .I ... .,..,...., ·:-J ,,i- : ex isti ng shed ,· ~:~~~~':e f to be re moved;,,.., . . : __ . ' "'"'o ""' (; ..... >-"' r r w S?U · existi riif~iees-I 1 ; existing trees '"'b to be removtid • _ "· to be rem.ove d L e e w o o d C o u r t lo ·~=,,.,..;.~;=,~;='ft'"',;.-0,...._1y.,,..,pi,...ca_i_~,..."-"..,.,---"-""-=-'-_,o,.".,"":;;o_'""-'--,......,.....,,.~-----··------_-__ _.-.. / ____ ·_· -..,...:....---..,.-------1yp-ic_a_1 _____ .-,_ ... _0 -J' ____________ -_-=J~=~N ·t'l:·. ,•· s arn'22• w · ,,,.;.,,., .,..,o •: 211.w:l i§ ~~ a. ~ .... ili ::i _;Q <I Z l- !2~ ~~v i!:z ~~ aw ~w ~F ~z ..,- °'Ill w Z "'< ..;::;_ ~~ "'"' "'Z §~ ~ ... GRAPHIC SCALE ;-::i:!i O -·jl_ 1· I rl :1 I I I I- I Parcel A 571 M 50 uu ~ ~~ ra I I I . OVJ {IN FEET ) v zo 1 inch • 20 rt. <z "'"" I Parcel B 571 M 50 Parcel C 571 M 50 Pa rcel 4 407 M 45 8§ »i.--1.... ~-~..;-~~, ~i ~i~~~~I ~ ~~ I ~~i-------;;R~E~Vl~S;l~O~N~S~:-----~--------------'J-_._-:~::::::~Y~Wl5::-:::::-"°""T--------------------r--;:R~E~F;E;R;E~N~CE;S;;--,;--------~----------------------1--------------------------.,...,s~HE~ET=----__j :;![ DATE DESCRIPTION BY: DATE: --"=""'=~=---l ~~ ~~· r-11 ~;~.~~\~i;~!~£~JQ~.~j ::~\~=~~l".::;='ld"'-----l t!j>-1--+---------------'----I ~ Gilroy Colirornio (-408) 8 42-2173 DESJGNED BY:1'<It.."' __ __j ~~ l--+--------------1---1 CHECKED BY : ____ _. 1---------1 T 0 w N 0 F l 0 s G A T 0 s s A N r A c L A R A c 0 u N T r JOB NO. ~c l _ _.t_ ______________ .1_ _____________ ..J._~D~RA~WN'.!.!:'...~B~Y:c.:::::::::T=M=·====::i--------------------1-------_J~F:._:£~B~R:_:U'.....:.A~R'..._'._Y __ ~2'._..'.'.0~t'....:.5 _____________________________________ _:__:_:...!.._:~:!..._~~i_---!~Q?~ .---r-CAL I FORNt l-. OF B D emo li tion Plan 4 15975 Union Avenue -apn 523-42-017 civi l:!Z ~~ 6!d O:tr a. .... "'"' _.., ,_,o: o:w <ui ..... 15~ ....... 50 i tJ zZ -< •t-Ca. Ow ;!O u w O :>< >-w ~~ ~~ z Ow FU <z ""' =io "'5 i(w l5 \!! u z< O "- ti< ""' 8<r c:a. Q. ~~ " ..... :iii= :;,VI z z o go "'-' o-' .... < ~~ -Ill :>z ::io >-i= v!< 111<.l ~~ a.U x w ..... !!!"' .._o oz ~< "'"' i'~ Z..J OQ. ;: <w ""' ::JW air ,, .... .. o j!; ~;; 0 ... i;!o «( Q.>-wz "'o .. (.) il!..J ~~ ,.vi r zw \.!O Fi ::i Ct:.., o W "-"' Q. ~ ... 111:;, .JO <I Zt- §;; l5"' ...... ;;~ o<> .... z o"' l:!W u r -t-~z .... - °'VI w z "'<i -'2 ;i ~ ili"' V>z zo gi= """ u<.l .;:G:: U(J ... .., 513; 0 zo <z "'"" ~VI irz < :i:ii' w i!O"' r ....... 00 Iii'" =>w w ,,! FF REVISIONS: -~----- DATE DESCR!P110K BY: ·--"'" • olU~ ---r 'o ,,_1. __ • ---~ •• r.-• Trod no . 8899 685 M 36 -37 -··----- . j • I .. ,,, 1-;-o"' DATE.-~y Uil5 -- HORIZ SCALE :.._,,,,,._ _ __, VERT . S CALE :~-- DESIGNED BY:.A·.~---1 CHECKED BY: -----! DRAWN BY:~--- -~---~-.. ...... _ -t-----. t --------------:,.- Bi 'osso m H'i I I R o o ci' ---_-~-~--.:._------· ·~:----r:=r--~-. __ . -~--=--- ~89'4S'lt"E " .,,, ' ' -35.0' -Z47.ll0' 0 . J 25 .00' .•• 92.80 ' 0 80.00' !) .. s 59•4g•21V/ (") 0 277.60' 0 1~ I ~ ~ Parcel A Parcel B 571 M 50 571 M 50 REFEREN CES L OS G A TOS 2 0' 5 TO W N OF 1--------t F C 8 R U A R Y Parcel C 571 M 50 Site Pl an -- •' Poree! 4 407 M 45 15975 Union Avenue -apn 523-42-017 S AN 1 A GRAPHIC SC ALE ( IH FEET ) 1 tneb • 20 fL SHEET 5 or B CLAR A COUNTY ~NQ CALIFO R NIA 14075 :::i:::W 20 ~g ~J "-"' ...,n. ~~ _,o ;;iF Si;< 0: OQ' ~~ e~ a"' ~~ ~z .... - """' wZ m:;: -'2 ~~ "'"' VIZ 5Q "'"" "'"" 00 G:Li: ~8 <110. o"' za <z "'"" EXJSTING ru<B, GOTltR ANO S!OCWl.tK Tr act no. 8899 685 M 36-37 l ·_ ~ ~ d r-0 ~ r _1 EXISTING CDITERl.INE 18.0' c:: :=> 1 1 ' ~V 4" WArk © @ --~ EJQSTING F1R£ HYDRANT >~ -o ·-·---- .1~..,.. ,_N:! rnSTING RETAINING Wl.tl Parcel A 571 M 50 GRAPHlC SCALE ( IN FEET ) liocb •2'0rl Parcel B 571 M 50 £XlSTING nR£ HYDRANT -r>o~r !" . ~ EXlSTINC (AC~~.',,., 24' "10E INGRESS/tGRESS EASEMENT PUBLIC UTUTIES EASEMENT Ml) STORM DRAIN EASEMENT Parcel C 571 M 50 OOTING CURB, GOTTER (AND SIJ!:WALJ( ---; "' " EXISTING RIGtT Of WAY a:.., TW Jl)J.4 ...,4.4 H1?i ~ r ~ C!»IST RfTAlff<G Wl.tl ALONG PROPERTY LINE Wini FENCE Pa rcel 4 407 M 45 "-=n•c FENCt rwm.o END Wl.tl ElOSTING fEllC( COMMON PRIVATE DRIVEWAY SCALE: 1"•5' 1. AU EXJSTING TR!IS "'lH~ THE STREET RIGHT Of WAY ANO PRO.CCT Slll: BOUNDARY TO BE REMO\ID, UNl.(SS OTllER'MSE OES!GNA Tl:O . CONSTRUCTION NOTES: <D OUSTING UTillTY PO..E; TO BE RUCA TID 'BY OTHERS' ~ CONSTRUCT ORl\IEWAY APPROACH PER CITY STOS a> FURNSH & INSTAU J WAl[R MmRS PER CITY STDS. © COl/NECT NEW WA1I:R srR~CI: MANIFctJl TO OOTING WAl[R MAIN PER CITY STDS. @ COl/STRUCT h{VI SAHITARY SEll£R MANH<ll O\'ER EXISTING SANITARY SEWER PIP£ ® CONSTRUCT 1£W SANITARY S0ER MANHOL!: PER CITY STDS. (7) COl/SIRUCT 1£W SAHITARY SOER L'1I:Rl.t PER CITY STDs. @ COl/NECT NEW STORM DRAIN PIPE TO ElOSTING DROP IN!IT Gl COl/SIRUCT RETAINl<C WAU; SEE STRUCTURAL Pl.ANS fOR ClMB<SIONS ANO OET AILS @ COllNECT NEW 15" STORM ORAi' PIPE TO EXISTING STORM DRAIN MANH<l.f; Ell INV 276.12. NEW INVERT 179.12 IN @ PRO-..OC m!:NCll Rf STORA TION P£R CITY STDS. @ CONSTRUCT CURS INLCT PER cm STOS. BLOSSOM HILL ROAD SECTION SCALE: 1"=10' R(TAJNING WAU _____. UNION AVENUE SECTION SCALI: 1'•10" ~~~-~========-=--=--R::E::Vl-_S_J_Q__N_-s--:_-_-::_-_-_-_~::_-_-_~~~~~~~-'-~~~~~~-,~D-A'l'E~:~-~~~-Y-U'l5~~-r~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~r--::R~E~F~E~R~E~N~CES;;::-~,-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-r,s~HE~ET;;:;;-~~~---1 =~ f-D_ATE-+ ____ D_ES_C_RTP_n_o_N ___ -;- 8 -Y-i: Im fj,~-~~.~;~~f1.£::f~~ ~i :~z. s~= .... · :":4(7:"-.:..-:::..-:::..-=.-=: Grading & Drain age p I an iil~ CJ ... ,o, Collfo<nlo (<Oil) 842-217J DESIGNED ey, A!N 15975 Union Avenue -apn 523-42-017 :::>"' 1--+-------------i---i CHECKED BY: -----; 1---------1 Fr £0 Bw RN u A Ro FY L 0 s G A T 0 s s A N 1 A c l A R A c 0 u N T y JOO NO. ~~l__jl_ __________ _j _ _L _____________ L.!D~RA~ll'N.:;.!:..'~8~Y:;.;;;:::;;:r~M;;;:;;;;;:~-------------------J.......--~~--...1...._:...:__~..;.;___; __ ~2~0..;.;_t ~5-~---------------------------~----~-=C~A.:_:L~l ~F~O:....:.:.R~N:..:_l~AJ_ ___ 1~4~0~7~5~ 6 or B ---~ ~ .. "c.'-4. ;--~--+ .. -1 ~~Pl(tll.lll -:-;!· _,........ .. •,.. --~ ... ~~ t w .. ·; ..... • ....... -<A....L ,/!--·' T roct no. 8899 685 t.4 36-37 L e e w o o d ··-- I .. - C o u r t 1• I 1· I >' i_ r i DRAWN 9y, ™- Parcel A 571 t.4 50 v Parcel B 571 t.4 50 ' 4·~· ,. 247 SU' r. Parcel C 571 t.4 50 _..-- -~---·:. ...... __ ,.,. ~--. TO WN Of' <----------< f' £ B R U A I' Y l 0 s GA T 0 S 2 0 ' 5 ... &a:1 : ... ~. =" ........... Parcel 4 407 t.4 45 i GRAPHIC SCALE i r ( DI l'l:ET ) l lnch·20 fl i '.QUI<( 6AruJ lREA0..0.f COOlllOL gl(D P(R SN<l A CURA VAU{Y URBAN RUNOff POU.IJllON Pft:WJ<TION PR~At< CJ STORMWATER HANOOOOI< AlTACHWEHl IV-I. PERIAOUS ANO IMPERIAOUS SURrACES COMPARISON TASL£ c. Totot Sit e h is-t irHJ lmpt rvious Sur fo e: es (aquore feet ) N/A 7,253 b. To t ol Site (ocres): a Toto) Ar.a of Site o·sturbed (ocres): 0 .99 oc o_gg oc E111slin9 Ccnditk>n of Site Are a Dist urbed (square feet) Proposed Condition of Silt Area 0 1tturb«O (squore feet) c . lmper.,.ious Surfoces S1dewolk•, Polios , Orive woys, etc, Streets (Public") Stre:ets (priYOte ) Totgf Impervious Surfaces: e.1: f. Pervious SurfClces Loncfa coped Areas Pcr'lfout Poving Ot her Pcrvious Surfaces (gr-een root, etc.) TolOl Pervious Surfaces: 1.1: 0 4,244 0 7,25J e.2: 35,851 0 0 J S.851 1.2. Rcplcccd ' New ' 1,9 0 1 5,388 0 1,061 9.059 2,962 e .3; 20.912 0 4,541 0 0 0 U : 25.•SJ g, Toto! Proposed Ree'oced + New Impervious Sur fa ces (t.2 + t .J): __ _, ___ --:-:17,...6'°'5"'1 __ __, h. Tot al Prooosea Replaced + New Pervrous Surfaces (f.2 + f.JJ_; 25,"453 i. Percent or Replacement o f Impervious Areo in r ede'l'tlopment projects (c.2 I c , 100): Jg:>k FootnoltS: 40.8 'Pro;iosed RepfOCtd lmptr"IOl.;J Si.Ktoc:t: Al Snptt\'IOUS M'fotes oc~td to cny orto ol lM iltt ltiot wca o prt¥iovtty ~ting 'nptn'ious M'foee- % ~Pro.postd Ne• lmptr1"io..ls Surface: penious turfoce. All mper«ius s .. 111oets odded l o Ctly cno of the site thot 1111os o pre.,.ously uislin<j 7 15975 Union Avenue -apn 523 -42-017 C 0 U H 7 Y JOB NO. OF B SAN T A CLARA C ALIFORNIA 14075 ..,..._ 50 iti ~~ .... 8~ ~8 :>:< ~~ <;:: ----:,,;:- ~~1-------------- z ow >=U «z ~~ ~~ :s~ z< O"-G< :::>:!: 80'. o:O. Q. l:!I" => ~i= ::>lll :x:5 gu "'-' ~~ r §"' ~~ -'o ,.;:: ~j iit~ o.U x w w a. Tract no . 88 99 685 M 36-37 ' ,_, __ . ,.,. • ; .£. ' .[:' .. ~ .. .e,, ~1. ~. f 1:• ,F Di ' ~ ,.;~ ,l 11 ~"' .._a 8:i 1-------------_/ 0: ~~ < Z..J oo. <= <w gt) L e e w o o d mr j[>---- ~~ <!i' o,_ ~~ Q. .... "-'Z g:8 ... ~~ ,_lll r ::t:w YU ~g ~~ ~a. llj s .... o <r z .... ~!i' "' OQ: ~~ ~~ a"' ~~ ~z ... - "'"' wz "'< :::3 ~"' VJ"' VlZ 5Q <= .... <e< uu t.:Lt:: 8U o.W ~5i zo <z vi< -i c 0 u r t ·o~ .. rW :M.,r. r,.)t<.3', :1 -j .; --~ p I IV :::i • I ,,. .. c:: I . IV ~r > ... <( ,-~~·~·. ~ l .q ·i IS: - c:: , I I-" ,I 0 I , .•. 11 c:: ·* => ·1:."' 1.">l ::§ .. .r ~, I I I n "C :· · .... I I I ·, 0 T• •• I I J ..... · Parcel A 571 M 50 . ·- 25' r::·-~L _,. --_., ... --. -, ..... , .... .....!-.... ~ ..... , ... - I · -.;:-_., '" • ·1 : ... • I j! '" « , '\' --~-I : : !1~ ' j_ t • . -~ ~ -~~1 • ·1· ' '.' '. A~ .• .. ri_ J ·• - . •. I (¥' ~, • I I .. :' "~-I I ' ""'-l .• i Parc el B 571 M 50 ,,, • I 1 1 .-. .---.... -- . ~ - -.. 'I ~) ••••••••••••••••••• l • .iui<.:. ,;•· ··~ \. " . c. •.•.• c;)i ""'·):~"'"' 0· Pa rcel C 571 M 50 I ·~} I, t• i 1 I I I J, . ,, Pa rcel 4 407 M 45 EROSION WUR<x NOifS I. EROSION CONTRCX. MEASURES SHALL lJ[ ETITCTII!: FOR CONSTRUCTION DURING T\iE RAINY SE<S(IN; OCTOBER 15 T\iR<llGH APRIL 15 . l NO STORM WATER RUNOFF SHAU. lJ[ Al.l.OYl[l) TO CRAIN IN TO THE EXISTING ANO/CR PR()>(JSE!) UNOCRGROUND STOOM SVSTEM UNT!i. 51.n TABl.I EROSl(JI CONTROL MEASURES ARE f\JllY IMPLEMENTED. NO STORM WATER RUNITT SHAli 0£ AlLO~tD TO ENTIR THE SllllM DRAIN SYSID< !HAI IS NOT C\£AB ANO f]j(E Cf S!!JS 3. A f1llrn ROLL I'()! "fl8ER Rru. OCT'1l SE-5' SHA!.1. BE INSTA!.1. ALOOG llf[ PERIMETER er THE PRO.£CT Sil(. T\iE LOCATIOO cr THE ASCR ROLL ALONG lHE P!J!IMCTER SHALL B~ AO.l.ISTEO TO ELI~N ATE SJ:DiMENT LAD£N RUMOff FR()l.I l£A~NG THE $11(. A Flet:R ~OU. SHAil AL50 lJ[ R[()JIREO AROUllD lliE PER!Mm:R er ANY STOO<PilE M OTHER SITE Of BARE. LOOS[ EARTH. 4. ALL STORM ORA'N MA~Q.fS. CATCH BASINS. ANO/OR DROP llllETS lliAT ARE 10 ACCl:PT STORM WATER SHAU HAI!: INLET PRO][CTION MLISURES PIJl DCTM. SE-10. STORM WATIR RUNOff SHALL BE DIRfCraJ TO THt:SE Nl£TS CM.Y. SIOOM DRAJN CATCH BASINS TH 'T ARE NOT COIJPLE1l:, SHALL BE BLOCKID Ot> C®PtfITLY. 5 THE NAME. ADDRESS. AHO 24 HOUR 1£LEl'ffilNE NUMBER Of THE PERSW RESPONSIBLE FOR llfE IMPliMENTATION Of THE EROSi(.ti CllffTRCX. PLAN SHALL BE PROl1 DED 10 lliE CITY. 'fl PRIOO TO GRADNC, AN El<TRANC!: SHALL BE CONSlR\JCITO, COOSISTI~C Of A MNIMUM Of 50 Lf Cl'" DRAIN ROCK, 3" IN OIAUE!ER, ---iua:n Ol{R MIRAFI soox {DR EQUAi.) PER DETAIL TC-I. THE ENTRANC[ SHALL COOfORM TO .CONSlRUC!la< ENTRA!<CE DETAIL rc-o ·. THERE SHALL 8( au IM EN!RANC[/l'~T P(JNT TO lliE sm DURING THE RAINY SEAS();. THE LOCATION li:I& 8( AS SHO"' OS THESE PLANS. 00 AT A LOCA Tia< APPROl!:O BY M CHY. 7. ALL AR{AS a BARE. 1\JRNEO OR DIST\JllBED EAAT\i SHALL BE SlA!lUZED BY USE a HltJROSE[IJ DR NON -l!:GETATI>f STABILIZATI(); PIJl EC-16, PER ll<E T'BlE BELOW. ALL S10CKP1l£S, AN0/00 BORROW AREAS SHALL BE PROTECTED '"lH APP!IOPRJA 1[ IJlOSlON COOTROl MEASURES SUCI< AS A P!J!IMETER SILT i'[NC!:, Ali!> OlliER UCTHOOS TO PRE\1'NT ANY EROSIOO M S!LTS MICRATIC>I. ALL EROS!OH CONTROl ME.ISURES Sl<ALL BE MUIT-0 UNTIL OISl\JRBED AREAS ARE STABILIZED. OiANGES TO THE EROSl(.tl CONTRO.. PLAN Sl<ALL BE MADE TO MEET AEUl CONDITIONS, BUT ONl Y '"Tli 1HE APPROVAL or. CR AT THE OIRECTIO'I Of TH E OSD. THE SIORJ,i DRAIN SVSTEM SHALL MAINTAIN ' FM M Of DRAIN !Nt.El PROITCTION UNTIL CITY Ata:PTS TH( ANAL STRITI IM!'RDl!:MENTS THE DRAIN tllfl PRO][CTIOO Sl<ALL BE MAINTAINED, Em:CTIYE AND SUB.£CT TO OTY ENGNEEJl'S APPROVAL 8. ALL PAVED SlRf:ET, AND AREAS AOJAC!:Nl TO TH£ SITE SHAil BE KEPT CLEAR <:F EARTH MATERIAl.S ANO OOlRIS. lliE SITE SHALL BE MAINTAJNED so AS ro ll!llliillE SID•ENT LADEN RUNITT FR()l.I ENTERING THE STORM DRAIN SYsrrM. 9. IT IS THE RESPONSll!IUTY OF TliE CONTRACTOR 10 tlSPECT AND REPAIR Ail EROSi(.ti CONTRCX. FAOLIT1£S AT THE END Of EACH DAY . ANY DAMACCD STRi.IClURAL MEASURES Ail[ TO 8( REPAIRED BY END Of THE DAY. TRAPP£D SEDIMENT IN "SO 1Nl£1S" (AND OTHER EROSION CO'<TRO.. ~EASURfS) SHALL BE REMO\/[{) TO MAINTAIN TR AP Em!ENCY. REMOVED saJIMENT SHALL BE DISPOSED BY SPflEADtlG ON SITE. v.tm IT l\lll NOT uiGRAl[. 10. IT IS 1);E RESPOSIB1UTY er THE COl<TRACTOR TO PRE\fNT THE FM• .. noo or AillflO'lNE ll\JST NUI SANC( AHO SliALL BE 11(SPOSIB«.£ roo ANY DAMAOC RESUtTING FROM A f/JWRI: TO DO W. 11. ALL DRAIN SWALES SHALL BE PER OCI AIL EC-9 12. INCOMPl.£1[ GRADING SHAil NOi EE ALLO'llED. CONTIMJOR SH/\ll M/JNATI N A OR/JN PAT\i AS SHov.N 00 THIS PWi. SAID DRAIN PAT\i SHALL BE MAINTAINED LINED DRAIN SWALES. AND NLET PROTECllON AT ' MINIMUM Ir PtlNDJNG DOfS OCUJR ON THE SITE AFTER GRADING. THE WATER ~UST lJ[ FREE AND CLE.IR a SIDMENT P~OO TO OISOi>Jt(;( TO THE STDRIJ DRAIN SYS1EM. TH<S Rt:QUROIDH MAY N[CESSITATl' THE USE Of NATURAL AND/DR UEOiANI CAL DESILTING MEllfOIJ~ SUB.EC! 70 APPROVAL BY lliE CI TY ENGI NEIR. 13. F MST: EROSIOO CONTRCX. MEASURE PRO\~ INADEQUATE. STR AW Ml.I.Di, TAO<IAER, AND ADCITIONAL HWROS!IDNG MAY SE REOtl!RED. Hl!lROSEm JAll!f !TEii LBS/ACRE COMMON BARlfY ANNUAL RYEGRASS CRIMSON ClOvrR f!RllUZER 7-2-3 f18[R MUL()j rACKIFlER LE GEND 45 45 10 400 2000 100 ~ CONSTR UCTION ENTRANCE/EXIT PER DETAI L TC -1 • • • • • • • FlBER ROLL BARRIER PER DETAI L SE -5 ,.- ,_) STORM DRAIN INLET PROTECTION PER DETAI L SE-10 GRAPHIC SCALE 'i i i MC& ( Il< ri:rr ) 1 incb ~ 20 ft i ~l/)1------------------.---------------.----------r-----------------------,i---;::;::;::;::;::;;;::;;:;:;;:--~----------------------------------------------------------,"'Siiii'i;;r-----~ o;'. ~ REVI SIONS : DATE; r"EllRlJ'RY 10\5 REFERENCES SHEET ~er -nm---OESCRJP'l'l.:..:.ON __ --+-"""'BY_:_:~ HOR!Z . SCALE:··--w=------1 Eros1'on Contro l Plan ;;1--------------1--1 ~ ~::~r~i,~~~€i=~i =~:~~=~ !flw C!IECl<EO BY:-----< 1 O W N 0 F L 0 S S JI N 1 A C L ~ R A C 0 U N 1 Y JOO NO. "'F DRAliN BY: n.t FE e R u A R y 2 0 1 5 c A L I F 0 R N I A 14075 ~F l__..!_ ____________ _J_ _ _i ______________ .J.~~~~;.;;:==========1----------------------l--------L-_:_ _________________________________________________ _:_ ______ _l. ___ _;_..:...;::....:.~ 8 GA T 0 S 15975 Union Avenue -apn 523-42-017 OF 8 s ·' "' "' I I ~-1-1-++-l-++-+-+-UP I I I I I I I I I ~---.0,.111111 I 4 -"'-0" I t I I I I l 1 I t l I ... I -1; I ' ~ I in i\ I I I I I ' I ;!. ~ I I \\/ITT I 0 ~ 0 ~ ! f: ?] 1 ~~~'"'""' I I/\ ~+ l ~Jt ~ ~ ~~l--~-~--:--l-l-'---4-l----l-+.---l-+--f'~~t-<\l:-~4l ~ I I I I 1.1,_i.;:; I KITCHEN L.J lll-1--j'-l-+-+-I-~ ~~""'~~. "',----4H----B-ED_R_O_O_M_5_ s: ~ - - - -- ---- - --I : : I M"D • LI' ,~,.~.l -~ I Jj ROO M I µ_-"=,~~"'' 1 1 D DD 0 .-----II ICiJ "00 _, _,,,_' ---I ~ D N IL--.1... _J f I I I I I I I I I I ' I : ',,~~,' : I ,, , 1 I : ;',, ',, : I , '' I c J·CAR GARAGE r~:-----------------::~ I --~-~ I ---I -----I -I --, -I ----I -I -I --I ----I --I -I ,. ---I --L -- -- r-,.,- I I --- t ;D I j , rl - -'l-------+----L__J 11---...1 I,.-- I L __ :2 '-0 " ~ ~ _J FIRST FLO OR PLAN LOT 1 REVISI ONS DS I I:; ::l/OS/lS >CALE. A5 SH~ S ll H T Al .1 12 CIT • 1. - II~ K :=JD I I ~ I I( TI ~ ~ ..L: ~ lft»i THl3 G BEDROOM4 1-I --u L cf !5 '- I O PEN TO BELOW nr ~ di .... '° ~ '° - /;..'\... ~ t I ;: BEOROOM3 LI l lJ. 1. 1cr-s 1 7 l ~ f- ]: I " MASTER SU ITE i -o · 1 -0· "' n I \ ~ ~ " SECOND FLOOR PLAN LOT 1 REV ISIONS ~ ~ < u 0 I;/) 0 ~ t;: 0 t.i.i I I;/) 0 ~ rJ1 ,...J 0 :I:~ ~~ !;; ~ a ~ w :J ~ rJ1 z ~~ w ~ < z z Q 0 z :J ~ V') z r-- °' V') ~ l l.\ll. 2/05/15 WAI 1, A !> S.HOl"!N S 11 b~T Al.2 ~ 0 ~o ~~ ~~ .: ~ qlZ ~ 0 ~ ~ ; I ~ " > ~ ~ ~ ~ ~1~ • .,, IP () w -+ I ~ ~ iR ~ m ~ ~ 0 z ~ I rt= ' I I b ~~ H u t:l n ' '::n -µ-t:-\: ~ -ri .ll-1• . "' '1"' ~r ~ " " -n S /12 , 11 -H , I ' nr: ' ~ "" U"'1' ,S, iflf ~~ ' L j § -= ~c ~~~ ~ .,!: ,_ ,_ -/:l tf J-t: I ! iJ t.P ~ W: ""'-a"-"-=-1-< rL tl .. J-i.. Cl ~ ~ 4--0-H-1-1t:t->-{'"M.J t::l r: ell lfJ "' ;;; t: ~ 0 1 -I" l::\:i[J::1{:l::fi::fE~~l->-'.__...,_,....~S/12 J;E 8=f.'j .-------7 1' ~ ' ~ -' 1-' R..tr-rrri .. ~ ,_c:i _;-l{'o R-c; Av· 10-., ~T1'¢~,-~~~~~ij~~I~ ' ' ' '• . ITT " .,,., ~ L. ~•'-l:t:J:f:JOI . " . ' . ·~ -'• " ' H L • ~ ,_;. ,; u, "'' g -tl; ~ ~" 1 " " • • '" HI • fl ~ 'riQ' lo~, ~ -I-I-T f' ' ' -' ,;-r,., 1_ _J S/12 ,J 1::1 .,l.j ~~ tl- n "''' "J.t m ~ o " TI "' "J± ' "' r '' • ~ ~"" ~ " , ' t I -· -' ~ I I ::: ~-..~.LJ~,, '"' C "-' L " ']L ,., ]~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ h T-r ~ ' TI~ ~ ' ~~ " '''" '> n -r c::i ~ b "' rr · • " .. ,,. m ~""'"" ti, .. D ;;w u ,,,,, , ,. " -'rlf'i. ' '"' ' ' " CT TI ,,,, ' ~ ~; • u ,,,, J' n " TI r. ~ r7l ~ ~ ~ TT 1 b~ S /12 !;:J,.r / TT •• TI TI .liLil.L, " • TI ~ ~ S /12 h"'r !: :0-Ji:[_ijc\~j]::J_,f!-tl:-\:lj1::tJ ~. ~ ~ ' n' -' ' "' TI " ' I -~ I.< " . "' ~ 'lil' -" ' ' rr Eb~ L.: m:u=t-rum -( ( -. ' G\ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ••11r1-ri-u-u Ii !1~ Y :" I> 8~~ II ~ ,, ~ ~ ~-~ }l-J ~ c \: -~Cc.-;---..:? ,,,..1 r-·~~ ................. ! !,R -:~~ •::11 c..i:.._: _ _,__.IDAV':."'!' .., .... ~-----... ~--.,~e. .. .,..,, • .ou-·~ ,,....,='"""'·~ ............ .,,.,,,...,"'$ ... "'6cr.•:::t::'"t'"•t '•"•""'•"°b•r-""9'"- ',:o.l_..lr., .. t .. C'.t 6\\•~='·V~h:; A NEW CUSTOM HO M E: UNION ESTATES -LOT 1 15975 UNI ON AVENUE LOS GAT OS.C A 3:11 "1 ~ ~ij !c!l Ill -< ---- PAIN'reD L.AP SIDI 'G- ~~o.oo· I ----- P AINTED l"OOD 5et..L.'T' SAND -- FRONT ELEVATION ~AL.E:: 114 " : 1'-C>" ~,,,. $e~.OO' LEFT ELEVATION SCAL.E: 114 " = 1'-C>" EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS ' 9 LOT 1 REVISI ONS ~ ~ <( u 0 vi p ~ ~ CJ Li.i Vl 0 ~ rJl ..l 0 :i: ~ ~ ~ 0 !-< Vl a ~ UJ ~ rJl ::J z ~~ u.l > <( <( z z 0 0 z ::J ......c v-, z ~ v-, ~ 1).\11· 2 /05/1$ srAl.I: ;..s !>~Oi"IN ~ 111· l·'I Al.4 1!!o (II - S \6.51'~ C.OMPO&IT ION &H IN G l E F<.0 01" !I01 ,,~ !l!Gdkt> FLOOR ---a00.\;;----0- TOf' P LATf PAINTED lAP &!D IN G ----r 516 5'1Ll. -.:R'"IG"'R"'!'"!S"'t->Fl"'ID"'G"~E'f',,,_ ___ ---------------. -- !!GOND'fEL.~ ---900.1;;-0- TO P PL;,TE PAINTED l"'lOO D G A Fl.AGC: DOOFI. Tl'tlM ------~~LlLllEilLl [g] Ll ~Id !Ell Id TOf' PL;,TE r--1---P AIN TED Y'IOOD l"l!N DO~ Tl'tlM ~=~~~=~::=:y..-= --i---L--~:~;r;~~ SC.A ll!:: 1/4 " = 1'-0" ---0-5 10 ,50' __ _ TOf' PLATE RIGHT ELEVAT ION &CA le: 114 " = 1'-0 " EXTER IOR ELEVAT IONS L OT I REVI SI ONS ~ ~ 6 0 v) 0 ~ !;;: Cl i.i.i Vl 0 8 00 ...J :c ~ 8 ~ ~~ a ~ tJ.) ;::) ~ 00 z LLl z ~ > <C <C z z 0 0 z ::, ...... V') z r-- °' V') ~ l li\1'Ji 2/05/15 ~CAI E. "5 SHO~ S ll El:l A l.5 16 OI - ----------~Es0-A50VEf ______ _ ~l&TING GRADE _/ LIN!: 511!> !11Li,. -H"'IG""'H""E"'!>'f..-ip::"'11"">&'"'fy...,._ __ . -• -• -• - n BEDROOMS l'==i I D ~15TIN6 l'O:ADE L INE I I KITCHEN SECTIO N A -A $GALE: 1/4 " : 1'-0" VERANDA --------- -- - --- --CiNE~o · ASOVE-7 ------- ---E1<15TIN6 GRADE _/ -------- LINE __,A""l&""'i'1~!5"'t..-i~<io1rb;,;~r.!4'0---. ---. ---. -. -. -. -. -. -. --'""~ TOP PL.ATE --- MASTER C LOSET DD I DD I D """' D I ---- SECTION B -B TOf" P LATE --- TOP Pl.ATE SECT IONS LOTl RE.VI SI Ol'S ~ H < u 0 en 0 ~ ~ 0 L.ij Cl) 0 ~ ~ ,....) 0 :i:: ~ ~ ~ 0 f-< Cl) OH UJ ;::, ~~ z w z~ ~ < z z 0 0 z ::i ~ ,,., z t'- °' .,., ~ D \11, 2/05/15 SC\Lf ~ 5 HOl'\'N Al.6 ,, (II • I ~ I I T I I ~ ---_,_ ___ ,_11: - - - -_,__ -.eo ----,__,_L ~ I ,_ I I I ~__j___j___j___j_--+--+--t--1--1--1--1--1--J--J--J--J--1--1f-'r--r--t--t--t--t--t,-1 I I U!-:--1---1---1---1---1--+-+-t--~---t---j !L~O~G~G~IA -l-----l-----l-----!--+-+-+-+-+-+-+--tr-11 ~ I I l I I 1' 55 -6'" ~ j .. I I I I I I I I I I I l I I I I I I I I I I I L OEN/ FORMAL DI NIN G Gl.610·-1· 5 1'-10 " I I I I I I I ) j \ I I I I I I ' I I I I I BEDROOMS C.LG 10'-1 .. I \ 1 3-CAR GARAGE I :r I I I I I ' I I I \ I I I II ______ :; 1=<--------71 ' I I '' / I ' / / i \ I I \ < /, "' ,,'' ',,: ~--------)/ Gl.6 11'·1" -, I I I I I : I I I I e~ n I J I I I I I I I I I I I I ~ "' ? 't "' FIRST FLOOR PLAN 5C-Al..!O: 114 " = 1'-0 " NORTH LOT2 REVISI ONS O.'\"I ~ ::t 5 /15 !'~J\1 .1; AS SHOY\."l S II idcT A-2.1 (JI· ~ ::: ~~ ·~-· ··~:~:~.·: .... · .... ::: ... ·~· ·~· ·~· ·~··~·!"'-,.·~·::·;:::._::_:·::::L~·· ··:_,:~.R::~:::~:::L~fLJ~~~, .~u u•. u "-' ................................ ,._., ........ I"-'!"-',._. I"-' r--.............. I"-' I'-' ............ I"-' I'-' r-- 1"-' -I'-' ,.._. u u ...... ,_ u ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... -...... ,._. --I'-' ~ -I"-' -,_ ...... ...... -...... ...... ...... ........ "-' ...... ~ ~ ~ "-' ...... ...... ~ -...... -~ I'-I'-' ...... I'-' I'-I'-' I"-' r--u I"-' ~ - ~ I"-' --...... u ........ ...... u ~ ...... ...... I"-' ...... ...... ...... --I'-' r---~ I'-' ~ I"-' -~ u --u u -"-' ...... ...... ...... ...... u -u -...... ........ -~ ...... ............ ,... .• ,,.,....,,--I'-....... -ri-I"-'"-",._. -r-.... ,_. I'"' - ........ ...... ...... --r-...... ,._.~,._. ........ ...... ~ u ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ••• ,... .• -•. '' .r--.. ,--,.. ...... r--r-I"-' -r---,_. ,... -~ u ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ---~ ~ --~ ~ u u ~ ~ u ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ u u -~ ~ u ~ ~ ~ I'----r-...... ._. ............. ' . ·'""-· .-_' ....... '' .-' ' ' ,r--,_. .... ' .. ,.. ' ' ......... X H-Hf-++-iG u u ...... ...... -...... ...... ...... I'-I'-' ...... ...... r-I"-' ._. -,.._. ,_ u ~ ........................ . . . ..... . ..... . . '' .-....... .r-...... -._... I'-r-.... . .. . ... ...... ...... u I"-' !"-' I'-' -I'-,._. I'-...... ...... ...... r--.-. '' ....... ~ .................... :i-. ...... ,._. I'-"""" ...... -I"-' ...... ~ -I"-' ~ ~ ...... ...... --...... r-r--I'-I'-' ...... ~ ~ . . . . . . ·:::··:::··:::· ·;::·-)__' ::: ::: ;:: ~ ~: ,._ I"-' I"-' -,._-\_. --...... ~ . ' ........... ,... .. ,.... '' .i--....... -.. -._,, .. ._,,--,_,._, '' 1 ~·-e.· I ' I I -· I ---· I MASTER SUI TE Cl..6 VkJL'f!D I I I I ~ ~: ·= .. ~ ...... :. ~ .. ~ .·.·:::·.·. · .. :::· ......... o ~o ...................... -... ....... ·2'i>~-~· ,,....-,,-.. --, ,-,,-,, ,--,,,,-,,1~;·~;;JEJ=!=~~~~~ ....... 12'-o· r--r'-'·4'-o· -'-0" ;; : ...... ....., ~ I'-' ...... ti.-tl-...... t} ,._ : fil.:. ·~··~··:::··~·· , ,, ... ·~·{:}· .... ·::: .. ~ll,,.J"l-...,..'HA'l'-t--t-'!--*Jllll LINeN Jr~.---1rr.=~~-:=:~==~==;;-:=:===~~~~~~==~=~-====::::::::::::::::::::~==::'._':f L Xll-l-+-'-~~?1'-t-!:*-11 c GL~ "'""' = MA STER +BATH 2 1-,j.4: 1-,,;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;=o===n;;iiiiil_,,_,,.,,__0.,."_--m C LOS ET -.,..,.·ytt-r-~ cl' O " ~~ HALL l 1 '= :-====::::;=t'"""~-----lll\\il\/Jli\llllJlffil 9 :. ~ ;:::::'.-=======~,====;:::==========~1-l-----'k'! 16'-0 O PEN TO LINl:N a--T --, BELOW '-co ., -W-.i -- I...._. "' ' J I I (I I ·I,~ !i I ~ - --13-EORQOM J -- ---- a ·-10 ·- 51'-10" l ~ C~V...iLTW ~ ~ BED IWOM4 CL~'f-4" lJ _J i Jill))) J )) )) (({ ( (cc ((( ( "'"'-2 e.·-e.· J_J.J RE\ISIOlo.S l l l ( r 0 l l l l l J l l J l 1 J l l l l SECOND FLOOR PLAN 11 1 1 l [l lllll lllll 1..,.<1.,.1,_,...1.,.1,_,...1.,,_,..1._,.,.,.1,_,....,.,_,,,_,.44.,.~ll.,_~1.,.. C-,J C l I C l l C ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) I I lll C I C[( cc (( J J > J J J J J > > c 11 ccc c 1cc1 r ~ NORTH 1 -0" !-'.::========~ LOT 2 ~C \l.l "S eHO l"IN > 111 I 'I A-2.2 VI ~ 0 ~o ~~ ~ ""'d .. ·~ o lZ ~ ~I N >.,.~ I ::: > c l'...):;:~ . ..: 5 VJ t I z () 11 -1 I "' 9 c: ~;:,_~~·::,-.:: . .: "i!.,·~:. ll ~~-:S-' '" •..l."'lt ilk r .,...u •••.,'••t''="9'- ' ... *!t~ .. ...-t,, .... lltf'••..-i."'-1- ~· ... ""'•"'"'"~lr•r'~:!'9 iii \.91 .. 0t.l•c."'\~a •·...-l-•·•I• "'"•-"-~ .. ~ __ j~ ~~1 1m W I I l!±J/ --------I -, \ UDI -· ~q·, ~UI ~-~ .... ' .. ~ ·-r: .. ::.,"-~~~·I {,_I --i""... ''.!' >'::'l "'< \ !'" •' -..... ""::.!. ~.· --:;?-~~f ·~ ---=-··~T ,f.tr~j ~ .~I//f.\i~''(;,,;.-"-'if~' < ~t'~ .... f'-'J ..... ;. -\ . . ,. ·'-''"·• • '.:.&.:~ {~\ , I ·,..(\ . .. • .• b ... ~.;' (j\11' -,:. ;_ <.?: (j\ 11 ~~ ~\) 0 ~ '11 8 11 A NEW CUSTOM HO M E: UNION ESTATES -LOT 2 15975 UNION AVENUE LO S GATOS . CA ~ 0 z ~ > to 0 < tI1 ::! r r~ ~ D!::C.OFlATIY E T;F<.F<.A C.OTTA GASL.f: Y!:N~ DEC.Ofi<ATIY i; HAJ..F C.OL.Ul-'1N {?~~,~~~~o--,\.- :2~b 1oi ~ rl"-~T ~~:::::=1:.j_~!;t:~~~~tl22;:~=t:±===±:::::.i:::J~i=:~~;:;::s<faL _ _J_L __ -f-_____ Jl __ ~~~ __ __..., Y IN'T'l.. C.LAD C.A&EM eNT J"(INDOJ"(& S" HAl-F FlOVND GAl-Y. GUTT!!Fl& FRONT (NORT H) ELEVATION DEGORATIVI:. C.Hll-1NEY &HFlO'..JP "&" TILE FlOOF &c.ALE: 11 .<" = 1'-0" V INYL C.LAD C.A&EMeNT J"(INDOJ"(& -------[Q[Q!Q [Q!Qg ~~!Q blbl!Qblblbl !Q~b) l &TUC.C.0 ON C.OFlNER C.01..Ul-'1N & L!:::!::b)===!EiJ====J=lEJJ=~==[Q~=-=-.1:::::::~=!==1 d=l==I! :::=:'.:ii ~=:=::S::::::iL:2~.60" &TUC.C.O F INl&H Di::C.ORATIY E Tf;F<.RA C.OTTA GABL!!. YE:N~ &!:C.TIONAL ROLL.UP G ARAGe DOOR LEFT (EAST) ELEVATION &C.Al..E : 1/4" = 1'-0 " LOT2 RE VI SIONS N ~ <( u 0 V') 0 ~ ~ CJ iij I V') 0 ~ rJ1 ..J 0 ::i:: ~ ~ ~ ~ V') < a ~ UJ :::i 3 rJ1 z ~~ UJ > <( <( z z 0 0 z :::i ~ .,.., z r- °' .,.., ~ U\C I .::/~/iS S II EET A-2.4 or SHAPW 4 PAIN"T?:D SX RAFTER TAIL.5 @ S ' O I C STUC.CO F IN ISH :Z~tO' PAINTED 4 SHAPED CO~EL. C!> GARAGE DOOR ROOF • • "5 " TIL.E ROOF V INYL. CL.AD CASEMENT Y'llNDOY'IS PAINTW l"IOOD 6eAlv.5 4 s x e RAFT!!:Re. @ S.2" O I C )l\(/2XE> V-RU5TIC. ON C.!!11 .. ING REAR (SOUTH ) ELEVATION SCAL.e, 1/4 " 1'-0" ~J~ 1 PAINTED Y'IOOD 6!:AM5 4 s xe RAl"'TERS @ 5:2" O I C. Y'l/2XE> V-IWSTIC. ON C!!IL.ING STVCCO COL.UMNS @ CORNE:.R OF L.OGGIA RIGHT (WEST) ELEVATION SC.AL.I!:, 1/4 " : 1'-0 " ~ 1 ;,- :0 .. r. 50q:zi: REVIS IO NS ~ ~ 25 0 v5 0 ~ t;;: 0 Ui [/) 0 8 00 ...J J: ~ 8~ 1;; ~ a ~ UJ ::::> ~ 00 z ~~ UJ > <( <( z z 0 0 z ;::i .. or, z ~ .,., ;::J f),H F.: 2 /!5/1!5 ~·· I L E. AS SHOY'!N S 11 1 I· r LOT 2 A-2 ·5 1\1 REAR RIGHT REAR --------------------&HAPED 4 STAINEP L.INE; 50' ASOVE EXISTIN G> G~APE ~ --~)\~:reR._T .... [J:.S -...... @ S' O /C -- -" --_ "S" TJL.e ROOF .:::=rL.~L,,..-:--:-~-:--:-:-::-~-:--;__,-:-:-l-\=:=~~:=:::=;::::==:,::;::::;:::::::;::::~===::1:;:::::=:W--:4-1,-:-.r:::....:;:::_....,-~.....,..~.l,-l.j__,..~~~LJl-ti=:l----~5!~1-00R~, 2~&1q ~..,, ...... ------'~-~-t_2ori.10· B -B SECT ION ~AL.e: 114 " = 1'-o" -------- -------------- -_____________________ -------------~-L.~~ ;;. ~OVE E.Xl5TING GRAPE SHAPEP 4 PAINTED V INYL. C:.L.AP S,X RAFTl!.R TAIL.& C:.A!!>EMENT "'INDO"'& "S " TIL.E ROOF @ S'O /C:. PEc:.ORATIV I: C:.H IMNl:Y SHROUD II A-A SECTION LOT2 R EV I SI O~S N ~ l5 0 ell 0 ~ t( 0 U.i en 0 ~ 00 ,..) :t ~ ~~ f;j < a~ !.I) ::l ~ 00 z ~~ UJ ~ <( z z 0 0 z ::l ~ .,.., z r- °' V) ~ D\11 2~/15 'C'll.l. A!!o!:>HOl"!N S 111 J,'I A-2.6 0 1 I I _..,__ __ .,_I __ _ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I '111 ~· -- I I I "''~ I . I I , 1 r I I I -+--+---+---+-+-'--1--'l--l-1--+-t--t--+--i-+--t-COVERED , _PA_TI_~ ; 1 I' 5S _,,,. *vE=='R'c-7A'EON="oA"'°---t--1+--t---i--1---t-t--t-i, I :21'·0 I ~~ ..- r ; ! I - - _ -_r-_ --_ i_-_r_ 1rX11 ll!i!m 1E>'·O" 1 '-0 " I 1 '·E> I I 1' r 0 INFORMAL DINING 1!'-0 --_J K I TCH EN I I I 11 I I I ' I I I \ I I I I I \ I I I I I f I I I I I I I ' I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I \ I I I I I I I I I I 3-C A R G ARAGE I II I r--------J ~L ~ ,---------" \' /I ; ' I/ I ' / I ' / I ), I , ' , ' I / ' I / / ' I ',I r ~-------- r-o· I ., 4 '-0" I I -I I I I :0 I :! I I I I I I ~ I ~ ~ I I I I I I ~ d) .0 I I I I I I I 9 I ~ I I I I I I I l ~1KST FLOOR PLA N RF.l 'ISIO'IS [. ~ ~ <: u 0 r.n 0 ti: ~ 0 S ii i.ET LOT3 A3.1 2 0 1 • ~9 :! BEDROQ M2 ~ lll"-6" 'f-6" t i -6" ~ ~ 4 '-6" ' ~ ~ !:< MA STER SUITE BEDROOM4 lJ [ 9 d) Ill SECOND FLOOR PLAN LOT3 ~.Al-f., 1/4 '" = 1'-0 '" REVIS IONS ~ ~ <( u en 0 0 ~ ~ 0 t.i.i CZl 0 ~ 00 ....) :I: ~ ~~ ~~ a~ w :J ~ 00 z u.l z ~ ~ <( z z 0 0 z ::i ,...... .,., z r- ::;"\ .,.., ;J I). ITL .:VOS /l S S<" II.I 1'$ $H01"\'N ~II FE'I A3 .2 !> or - LEFT FRONT LEFT REAR P'°'IN TW SHEET Ml!T "'1-c:.HIMNEY SH~OIJO RO OF PLA N LOT3 eC.AL.E: 1/4 " = 1'-0" R£V1 s 10 -.s ~ ~ <( u 0 vi 0 ~ ~ (J Ui Vl 0 ~ rJ'J ..J 0 :r: ~ ~ ~ 0 f-~ [/) a ~ LJ.l ~ rJ'J :'.) z UJ z ~ > <( <( z z 0 0 z :'.) ~ .,., z r-- °' •l"l ;;J D\TI 2 /0 5 /15 SCALI' "-5 SHOY'l.'i 5 11 E hl A3 .3 "' u l - H16 HEST K IDGt S:r.l.30' TOPPLATI: 0 T;!l~~~! 0 ---.R"'IG"'R"'!""!ltri511!'.,;;2i;,.;;·:;;:;~;o,' ~--- - -- - - - -- --- -- - - - ---·----- --- -- -- ----- -- P AJNT'eD "OGEE" GUTT?:!'<. e::;i ec• TOPPLATe 0 T:l ~Te 0 PAINT'eP FASC.IA~--1r .... -_,._.s- VINYL. CL.AD ~-----"'v= -~ ~INDOl"e ~ ,.,,..A Dl!:CORATIVE PAINTED "r;oop ~UTTI:R& 5 11.'1"7' y PAIN"TCD r;oop meL.L.1& YVKNee Sl'<ACe& FRONT ELEVATION ec.AL.e: 114 · = 1·-0· -'!.--------------------------..,,...--.._---- --·-- ----·-------- - --- --- ------- -- ---- -- - -- -- ------ ---~.r;~,;;.f,2.;;;f'-'e~~·T~R~t>~G~E- C.OM PO&ITION ~IN G L.e ROOF P A INT'eD PA&CIA PAINTED~OD C.OL.UMN& LEFT ELEVATION SC.ALE: 1/4 " = 1'-0" ~22 50' 0 TOP P LAT!: 0 T.;;.1 ~~n: !GONt> f!L<:5C* ~~~PiAn: PAINT'eD FA&C.IA :;- 9 LOT3 R E \ 1510115 ('f"I ~ < u 0 v> 0 ~ t;;: 0 iii (/) 0 ~ 00 ..J ::i::~ 8~ ~< t>~ Lll ::i ~ 00 z UJ z~ > <( <( z z Q 0 z ::::> ~ V) z r-- O'I V) ~ D \Tk 2 /05/15 SCAl..li ~!SHO~ s ll lol! I A3.4 5 OJ - ~ 0 ~ l>.) IO ~ Cl ~ 1-j tti r (jl tti ~~ ~~ ~ " 0 ~z 'l I -I ,---------~ ~ 2 ~ ~~ 0-.,,,,-(I) ~ r. :·;!.::..:·.~~~~,;:;::.~~~·;~~~~ = W ; ~ ~ ~~:= .. !:~c.M .. o~'"'"~~~e"'O -• ~ ~ ~ =--~~~:.~:;.:-;;:-.::::::-:-~- , h S,} :::, '"~-'"<•bo"·'-c·-~~ \J I ~ QI ~··•,v I I I I ·- 1 • I I 11 I 1 j I 1i11J u I ~ ~ l ! 1-1 I I I ll :l < )> z z z o -< ij o r ~ () ,. ~ )> ~ > I I I I ~1 ~ ~i~ I I I I I I ' I ::1\t I I I I I I I I I I I I i i I I I I i'i• 11 I I I ' I I, 1,i I I I I I I I I I I I I . I I I I 10 '1!" I ,LI 1 1 I I I I I 1 I I I 6l 11 : ~pu : ill~ ~ij ::z ~ij :l I (;;~ I ~ ~~ jl8 I I 0 3 I I I I GI ~ I 0 0 I I Ill I . l I I 1 I I 8~ rz ~ij ~' H 1)18 ..,,.., 1)0I 1t ~ 1) ;~ i;· i;i; IJ ;;It: ;;I . A NEW CUSTOM HOME: UNION ESTATES -LOT 3 15975 UNI ON AV ENUE LO S GATOS. CA ~ :» ~ tti r ~ tti ~~ ~~ ~ " 0 ~z I ' 8~ IJI ll rz iJ! ~ij zZ (i\ ij lfl~ r )> 0 ll I I [ I in· ~-·.ii I I I I :l < z z ~~ ~ I 1 j (i\ 11 I I ~! ~r ~ ~ ~ ' ~. I XI H ~ .. ~ .. :l ll ll 11 'c? ~ i:JI lfl 8 z}'. }'. r ~ ~()I o z z ~ · ;;! oz:r ()ij ij -iih :l :;;~ jl~ -ii I I 3 I ~ I I () 0 -' ' z )> \ I I I (i\ ll 11s Ul ll I ~~ 8 :r iJ! I -z JI ij ,. ,, ~~ I ~ ~ ~ )> -< ~ 1J ~ ~ 'l ;!~ z ~ (i\ r 111 -------L IN! SO ~ AeOVE l!Xt!'>Tll<<> """'°e -------......... -------------=.u,J. J.,~zi.ar. --R~, .. -;..!5.....,;i;;KO;,;;;;&;,i;fy----- ----- ----- - - - -- -- --- - - -- -- ---- --- -- ----- - - ---- -- --- ----- ---- --- - - - - - - -- - ---------;'f~ .. s."'-"'·e""i .... l<"''""'&Te- ti CO VERED ill.!Q -- KIT CHEN ---- MASTER CLOS ET ---- !21 . .fi&'d.. --o=, .. ~µ~es~t;;w;,;., °'o:'°!<f,.,__ - - -------------- - ------ ------- ---- ---- D 3-CA R GARAGE SECTION A-A UEOROOM2 STAIR LAN"i>iNG D D MASTER CLOSET D ln l BEDROOM 5 l ~I SECTI ON B -B ~AW:.: 11"' = 1 -o" FIN ISH 6RADE L INE LOT3 REVI S IO?<S ~ ~ <( u 0 ul 0 '- ~ <i: t.J Li.i r.n 0 ~00 ....J :r: ~ ~~ ~< a~ !.Ll ::i ~ 00 z ~~ !.Ll > <( <( z z Q 0 z ::i ~ .,., z r:- O'I .,., ;:J Dllb ::?/05/15 >C,\11· AS SH O l'\N S ill· Lr A3.6 i OI - BL OSSOM HI L L ROA D l ~ ... !7,,--.,.S....----- ---~ ,....-:::.:. Ul ::> z w ,> < ADJACENT RESIDEl'-CE SHADOW STUDY 12 -21 3PM SC.Al..E : 1" : ;io• R w ::> z Ul ,> < z 0 z ::> I I . t ' BLO SSO M HI LL ROA D 1 5')55 ADJ ACENT RESIDENCE SHADOW STUDY 12 -21 9AM SC.ALE: 1" = SO' ------- [ z 0 i22 > i5 co :::> U) ~ U.l z <( R EVISIONS 00 ~ ~ < ~ 00 ~ z 0 """"' z ;;;:J U) 0 ~ 0 U) 3 DAl 1· 2 151 1!!> S(~\l.E AS SH~ S ll EI I A4 .l 50 0 1 - Landscape Notes tJ rrcl UlnW'llc.tkm O-a.mg ,..111 n.Mte O"I ..,.ogotbn PIM, Deuiflt. ortt:! 5pcc:f1c..atloM lh:»t Ne! ~ "~&tl'.u.C$ of n ""'2tc .. EUkknt ~-· !o~cc.~ lo<olbrl of ~on •IW to tio oa_..,.tod to O!I Lo btsl c.oordrote "'!I) ~!QI\~ \o(.oiiorw,. ~. o-~ ftQ'.U!'ift O'd !J VN ! nc.n OHp ""'Id'. f\ o U plor'IU'lg or.at. PrOOJ~ ~ ... !ti\ arew-Ctf\I. m.ilG.h tO'l'plo• O"ld prtc.a" .-.c.~ ~ GNp rron'I "911Nr ., Glo¥ord0\c., O"ld ~ G.O\orod l"'bndor ~ ''°"" Vi.bn ~li'lg "'fremoinl '4) ir.tou plait• lor ou plalt c.lrc.!et •l'ioioin Ot1 ~ ploi o ven If ~ c:ren't ~ledl. Goll PM 'IO'lfle.Otlon r'or ~!fig ~··· If no Ol"MI II ovOlk:lb!O to a'l&l"ltlf (\IJC!tlont, Cl&S~ tl".o' ~ plont ''"'I" 6(;.Q~d It" lhai &' ... Jdt:I It. 5 (jl'I. •It• c:w-d ary c:!t"'c:lo $GC/Od lc::r90"' le 15 gol. ti:• 5) Thf p~ It $Gt'lcttnotlc.. Don't Ntoll plonle too eloH t.o •q:s of paving or ~ldir91 . KHp volvtto C>'ld '!klc. '°"'Ptora ~ from tree~. &) TN pion~ ,.,11 do ~h boUer If •"orl• to IKl(.~t soll thot t'O! I:!. ~Ud d.rlng D..illdlng c:~trvc.Uon. 1) ~. lf'CC:•. c:DnU'"'*"9 ,.011 ~· a'!O Pcrt.1!11er, ~or blddr .g pwpo~t witH \hi toll l •rtll~ tetl a dono, blc:J ti ~ Fe;, or 61"'1 c:>gm:c.. Supor ~ ~t lb~ of 12·1:2·12 t6t'Ul•xor t~le.a rte tho tap e.• Lo ti• or t011 oftor rlppf'lg ~I t.o 12 ' ci.e.p •~cipt °"' ~uep tlOl'f't.. 5otne. "' U'lo plO'lt i'lg Ol"Ult ere .o ""'"°"" that It l'lltll nesd to be. eug ri ~ t'o'lc:I. &) Tr.er"• ere. rd k::lton cram -.) Prewrve: o'ld ptolut inc. cllitt~ Rf.d><JOd Tru °"'Lot t ca per the r~UOl'lt ~ the Nborltt ~port "'~ pt'Ote.clN• f•llU'IS ploud 11'1 W IOGotlcfl ~fr.d In ~ Clr'bot'ltt r.-port Ho 111111'.lj Vcetd\ Dhoti tie.~ ,.._"1\t'I & l•ot rodU& of ~ c:u.t"°~ mob.Ire tr.a. ~"'9. oP .pode. or ~ e.ICGO\f'OCIOn irel:hoo a ~oveo b.j ~~ 7.;!t::~~':,i.;!:;:!.~:;i:~~:";,,.:C~~~.t::;:-;~ ~:?:~ ~ a:'h9 ~~~llcwt. Plant Lege nd T"l.l..~ar'ldVINES. R! !o ~lr'lt.c(j"1fc~ l'fl l"kstrtlgta ln.il~C>UI rt Pitt.ospon.m tari..itfolVti fS F•!.}Clowt~ GG-'"V"tn 'OIMVIS ~to Gl G~.ost.oono c.ol 1tugo10 .. prcwbe 1Qtl"'4 °" ""()fl P8 Db.!k.tb b.IUna-.otto pr-0'.'tde \Otlk.e Ol'I ..Cf! = 51Zf BOTA."IC.~~ -9fW!> "" Ncrdlna 6ulf !Xl".on Rt. 5 ~~:;:or "" 5 "" 5 Nondi"o bvl! s.tr.om Le 5 l.omcrdro ero.1• u. 5 ~t....."""""""·'~ta 61<"-"" GOY'eR5 LM L.ontQ'IO l"Cnt4via."iflt P'-"P"' Li'! UriO"IOll'IOflt4v~it~ 10 .-."°"9'°""""""""'~ ~ SoMo~ 51< 5oMoHo<llps iCUCJ"~~ G-A Go~osti. tC.cri Forst« """"""'"- ~'J8GPl'tloo __ .,,..,,. Fo<""9"'U~ "'"'"""~- Dnaf Mf'Ue Pvple,l.allorro ~ L<>'ta<o tolollY• lrlt l"'~xle.m '5ogt tl"r---~~--.::"77-"'7-~~~~-N8_9._48_'11_"E~-x~~-B_L_o_s_s_o_M~_H_IL_L~R_O~A_D~~~-~_'Tu-=--~~~A--~---1'E------~~~~~~_.:::._:24~7.~80_'~~~"·_·~~~~--=~1 z () z :::> 6 N 0 r-- LOT I l.~oplt'19lf'lre.or"tjG'it'dt. by Mvre orr.ers .... x 6 '1a!<:.E x x ,,, l.c:l"d&G.optrig lrl r•or ~orm ~fl/krO QW'liOl"t LC>S61A LOT 2 x ... 6 ' la<c.E 6 ' lf>ICE L0661A PATIO x x·~ )("~ ® LOT 3 "~ ""X x. Re vision <( () _w vi -0 (/)~ _,.,..., r--Cl.) (.'.) b (.) IJ) t- 0 c 0 ....... Vl _J 0 Cl.) I <J) N 1:'.J :J '<:t" c I ("') (/) ~ N Cl.) <( I.{) z ~ .Q Cl. c <( ("') '.:) l{) t- (j) l.() ...- Appendix B : Tree Inventory Table Table 2: T ree Invento ry Tree Spee-Trunlt -Height -Crown Condobon Suotabilrty Influence Olameter Radius lot levre4 Preservation Coast 11116 oak 1646 ( OUercvs 1J911folia) PYMll ( IJguslflJtn /U<ldumJ Pl 111111 ( l.Jguslrum lllCldumJ Prt\/el ( LJgusttum lucKlum) PliVet (UguslrlJITI IUadum) Ca nary Island pine (P1nus canaflens1s) Aleppo Pl!l<l (Prnus ,,.,_ns<s) Caldorrva bockeye (Aescu/us calilomlca) Privet (L'9i1Strum /<JCidum) Plrvel (Ltgusuum /uOdUm) Pl11111t ( L/guslrum lucldum) Podoc&rpu3 (Podoca!p<IS macrophyllus) Podocarpus (PodocatJ>US macropnytlusJ Podoca1pus ( Podocarpus macrophyiftJs) Poclocatl>us (Podocarpus macrophyllus) Podocafl>US (Podocatpus macropnylAJs) CoaslrOOWOO<I (Sequoia StlmpeMrens) Coast r edwood (Soqu<>A U/1"¥>Pf\llfettS) 1647 1649 1650 1651 1652 1653 1654 1655 1656 1657 1658 1659 1660 1661 1662 1663 Lemon (Citrus 1664 limon) 16 25 G 8 I tO 6 6 8 6 30 24 Holly oak (Ouercus 1665 9 And G 110J!) Deod8f cedal (CedrusdeO<lara) 1666 t 6 Mulbe<ry(Morus \ 1667 11 •llU) Shamel ash t 668 30 (Fraxmus uhde1) Mlllberry(-VS 1669 10 .... , Eastern black 1670 14 wa lnu1 (Jug/ans rogra) PIM'! (Llgvsllum 1671 6 lv<:ldum) Eastern bllld< 1672 t 4 waln<.C (Juglans nigra) Coastredwood 1673 16 14 (SeqUOKI 10 , 4 ''"''''"'"'""'t Eastem blad< 1674 t 2 wa lnu1 (Jug/8ns nigra) Giana 50QUOl8 t675 13 (Sequo.adendton ~n1eum) 25 15 15 15 15 45 10 15 15 18 15 15 t5 15 45 4 5 10 35 45 25 35 20 20 25 25 1 25 10 Faw Fa< High Fai Poor High 6 Far Poor Poor High 6 Poor H igh 10 Good Good High 10 Fat Poor Hgh 6 Good Good Moderate 6 Fol' Poor Moder ale 6 Far Poor Far Poor Mode< ate Fa• Moderat.e 6 Fa. Fal' 6 Fon Fa• Moderah:t 6 Far F .. Moderate 6 Poor Fa• Modece l e 10 Good Good Modeia1e 10 Good Good Moderalo 5 Poor Pooo Hogh 10 Good Good Moder ale Poor Hogh Poor Poor Hogh 6 Poor Hogh Poor Poor High Good Poor 10 Poor Poor tO fa• Poor 8 Poor Poor High I 8 Poor Poor Hogh lrree Specleo Monterey pine (Pmus 1ad1a1a) Mon18feypone (Pinus ,._,.dta) Eastern black wa lnu1 (Jug/ans n.V•) Privet (LtgUstrvm /ucldum) -eypone (PITTUSrado.'lta ) Coasl 11ve oak (Quercu~ a911folla) PIM!! (l.Jguslrum tuodum) Provet ( 1.tgusuum IUCJdtim) Eastern black wa lnut (Juglans nigra) PrM!I (Ugusrrum l<.oadurrr) Privet ( L19ustrum lucid um) PIM'I (l.Jgustrum /unium) Pr ivet ( Ltguswm lucldum) Siik loee (A/bma 1uJ1bussm) Deod8f cedar \Cedws-•) Calalonn cherry (Prunu"f 1hc1foJ1a) Prlvel (Ugustrvm IUddum) Coast IM! oak ( Ooorcus agrrlolta) Eastern black wa lnUC (Jugtans nigra) Pr1ve1 (l.J,IUS!rum IUadum) PTMll ((Jgustrum /<JCldum) Prive! (L19ustrum tuodum) P111111t (UgvslflRn lv<:idum) Madfone (All>ulus menzieSH} Coast Hve oak (Ouercus agrifolla) PT11111t ( Ltgustrum loodum) Prlll6t (Llgustrum l<JCidum) Siik oa~ ( GreW/ea robcJSla) Coast ill6 oak (Ouercus agrilolla) Soll< oak (Gr•'"'"'• robuslB) PllV81 (Llgustrum lucldum) Deodar c.edat (Cedrus deodaral Coast 0116 oak (Ouetcus~) Co85t tr..eoa• ( OuBfCtJS ag11/ol•a) I Trunk -Height -Crown Condttoon Sui taboloty tntluence Diameter Radius for Level Preservataon t 676 35 t677 18. 18 45 1678 18 35 1679 8 25 1680 19 35 1681 12 ' I 25 1682 6 15 1683 6 15 1684 30 1685 6 25 1686 1687 1688 25 1689 20 1690 20 1691 10 1692 1693 to 1694 22 30 1695 6 15 1696 8 15 1697 15 1698 8 15 1699 si t5 1700 14 25 1701 16 35 1702 25 t703 25 1704 9 20 1705 17 1 25 1706 20 1707 25 1706 20 1709 12 25 Dead t5 F00t t O Faw Fali 10 Dead 10 Fau 6 Fa• 6 Fa1r 12 Fair 6 F .. 6 1 Fa• 6 Far 6 Far & Fe1 6 Good 6 Poor 10 Poor 6 Far 6 F .. 6 FJ• 6 Far 6 Fao 10 Fai' 12 Farr 10 Fair 10 Poor Fa• 10 Poor 8 Fa• Good Fair Fa• Poor High Poor Poor High Poor High Poor Hogh Fa• High Poor Poor High Poor Poor Hogh Poor Hogh Poor Poor High Poor Higl'I POO! High Poor Poor High Poor Hogh Poor High Poor High POOi P00< Hogh Hogh Poor High Fair High Poor Poor High Hogh Fai" High Poor High Poor High Poor High Poor Aleppo ptne (P1nus 1710 30 8 Poor Poor High /oa/apensfs) Tree Species Trunk -Height -C•own Condition Sultablhty Influence Dlome1"' Radius for Level Preservation Coabl live o a k 1 71 l I ( Ouercus "f}flfOllB) Coast IM! oak 1712 (Ooe<cusagrilo/la) Ch11lese elm 17 13 ( Utmus patvtfo/Ja) Catalona cheny 1714 ( Prunus ilk:doloa) PIM11 (1Jgus/rum 1715 lu<:ldum) PliVet (Ugusrrum 1716 1 iucidum) I f1'oll61 ( LJgusuum 1717 IUadum) Easlernt>laci! 1718 I walnUC (Jug/ans nlgra) I PottO!ijX)f.;;,, t719 (Po11osporum I eugenoides) Pe81 (Pyrus 1720 communos) 1 Prrvel(Ugus"'Urn 1721 lucldum) j Holly oak t 0.-CtJS 1122 lleJ!) I Coast redwood (Soqooa S(Jt'n/)elVH'BnS) 1723 28. 32, 10, 6 Coast hve oak 1724 ( 0u81'CUS agr"()//a) Coasttr..eoak 1725 16 16 I OtHircus ag11follo) Plivet (Ugustrum 1726 lucid um) 1'1110.porum t 727 l Pl"°'f'O'um eugeno«tes) Privel(Ligustrum 1728 /ueidum) Souchem magnolia 1729 (Maqoo/ld grandlflora) Pylacanlha (~Iha angusllfoHa) Elm l Ulrnus dtnetlCdna) Deoda• cedar (CBdrus deodara) 1730 1731 1732 Deodar cedar 1733 (Cedrus deor:lar•) Deodar cedar 1734 ( CBdrus deodara) Stone pone (P..,.. 1735 -·> I Coast bve oak J 1736 (Ou6rcus agrilof1a) A!lPle(Malu> 1737 <*>me•lca) I English watnul t 738 , (Jug/ans reg/a) Plum (Prurlus sp) 1739 Coast ~ve oak 174 0 ( Ouen:us agtiloloa) s.-ac:acoa 174 1 (Acac,. dealba••l J Willow (Salix \ 1742 babylonica) Hollywood ,.._ 1743 l .luntperus C'hmen~~ "Toru!O".:ta Hollywood 1unlpe1 1744 (JIJ/llperus c1Hnens1s 'Toruk>sa' 2 20 8 22 10 5 20 12 12 12 6 19 20 14 18 36 10 2 8 30 10 20 20 15 15 15 15 15 25 15 10 20 20 45 35 30 20 20 20 8 40 45 45 45 45 10 10 25 10 10 25 20 20 5 F .. 10 Poor 8 Far 6 Far Fa• tO Poor 10 Poor Poor 6 Fan 6 For 15 Far 20 Fa• 15 Far tO Fa• 10 Poor 10 F ar 4 Poor 6 Poor 10 Poor 10 Poor 12 Faw 12 Far 15 Fa• Poor 10 Poor POOi Far Poor Faw Fat 8 Fa&- Poor Poor Poor Poor Poor Poor Poor Poor Poor Poor Poor Poor Poor Poor Pooo Poor Poor POl'lr Poor Far Poor Poor Poor Poor Poor Poor Poor Pooo Poor Poor Hog h High High High Hogh Hogh 'High Hl(l11 High HIQh High Hogh High High I High ~Ugh High High Hogh I I Hog h High High Hogh High I Hig h Hogh Hogh 1 High High Hiqh I High High High Tree Specoe• Cherry (Ptunus sllffa la) Crape myrUe \LagetSl!Oenwa 1ndlca) 1 Oeodar cedar o ( Cedrus d80dara) I Provel (Llgustrum /ucldum) Soulhem mognolla (Mag,.,.. grandilloi•J I Carob ( Ceratonia s1/iqua) Tnstaru ( 1i1statwa tonna) Black ac8CIO (Acacia I melanoxylon) Blact< ac8Cla (Acaaa """8t>oX)jor) /!:::: (Eucalyptus palyanthemos) Englosh wal!1UI (.AJgtatls 1sgr•1 HoUywood juniper (Jun-us Chtnen51S 'Torulosa' Loquat ( EroOt>Orrya J/l(XNllC8) 1745 1748 1747 1748 1749 1750 1751 1752 1753 1756 1757 Trunk -Height -Crown Conditoon Suitability Influence Diameter Radtus tor Level Preserntton 10 Fa• Poor Hogh 10 Far Poor Hogh 22 45 12 Good Good Hogh 6 20 Fa• Poor Hoglt 6 20 Poor Hogh 10 15 10 Fair Poor Hogh 10 Fu Poor Hogll 20 Faw Pooo t8 3 5 10 Far Poor 35 12 Fa• Poor 12 20 8 Fal' 8 20 6 Far l'OOI H igh 10 10 FJr Far Existing Tree List Rev isio n en (]) (.) c (]) "'C en (]) 0::: <{ 0 (/) 0 -ro (9 (/) 0 _J Q) ::J c Q) > <{ c .Q c M :::> ... I.[) ,...._ (j) l.() ....... .. _ _ .... ,...._ ....... 0 ' N ,. (") N I.[) z 0.. <{ L2 April 6, 2015 Ms. Jennifer Savage Community Development Department Town of Los Gatos 110 E. Main Street Los Gatos, CA 95031 RE: 15975 Union Avenue Dear Jennifer: ARCHITECTURE PLANNING RECEIVED APR -6 ·~2015 TO\MJ OF LOS GATOS PLANNING DMSION URBAN DESIGN I reviewed the drawings, and ~ted the site. My comments and ·recommendations a.re as follows: Neighborhood Context The site is a large lot with other Small subdivisions nearby to the north and cast Photos of the site 'and sur- rounding neighborhood are shown on the following page. 700 LARKSPUR LANDING CIRCLE . SUITE 199 . LARKSPUR. CA. 94939 TEL: 415.331 .3 795 COGPLAN@PACBEll.NET .. ~~ ... "'~ '1\ ~. ' \'•-,~ .. - ·:. ~ .. \'~ . . ' Blossom Hill Road east of th0 she 15975 Union Avenue Design Review Comments April 6, 2015 P:ige 2 ru!> • Blossom Hill Road Nearby homes across Union Avenue CANNON DESIGN GROUP 700 LARKSPUR LANDING CIRCLE . SUITE 199 , LARKSPUR. CA. 94939 Concerns and Recommendations 15975 Union Avenue Design Review Comments April 6, 2015 Page 3 The three homes arc well designed with visual variety between the adjacent homes and good consistency of detail related to their traditional architectural styles. ...... Lot 2 House Lot 3 House The size of the homes is similat to others nearby, as shown on the site plan below superimposed on the aerial photo. CANNON DESIGN .GROUP ?00 LARKSPUR LAND ING CIRC LE . SUITE 199 . LARKSPUR . CA . 94939 There are only two minor issues. 15975 Union Avenue Design Review Comments April 6, 2015 Page 4 1. The depth of the porches at the entries to the homes on Lot 2 and 3 are less than the 6 foot minim.um called for in Residential. Design Guideline 3 .10.1. However, I do not find this to be a significant issue. The house on Lot 1 which faces Union Avenue has an entry porch depth exceeding 8 feet in depth. The entries on Lots 2 and 3 face auto courts where the porches at the entries are less likely to be used as a functional porch. Both homes have other deep verandas for private open space use. - Lot 1 Entry Porch & Veranda " .. . , ,' ! \/ 1 //\\f ~ ,. . -... -~~~-~ /.ot 2 Enu;.1 f'orch & VerJnda CANNON DESIGN GROUP Lot ·1 f nt ry Po rch ' ·-· ~ - .:< Int 3 Entry Pvrch & Veranda 700 LARKSPUR LANDING CIRCLE. SUITE 199. LARKSPUR. CA 94939 15975 Union Avenue Dcsigo Review Comments Apri'. G, 2015 Page 5 2 . The perspective sketches for the three homes appear to show modular paving for the driveways in front of the entries and~ while the Planting Plan (Sheet L1) shows modular pllVing only for the common driveway serving all three homes. Adding modular paving to the individual unit garage aprons and exterior parking paving would be desirable. I have no other l'.ecommendations for changes to this project. Jennifer. please let me kn~ if you have any specific questions or need any other specific iasues addressed. Sincerely. CANNON DESIGN GROUP ~~ Larry L. Cannon President CANNON DESIGN GROUP· 700 lARKSPUR LANDING CIRCLE . SUITE 199 . lARKSPUR CA . 94939 This Page Intentionally Left Blank r•~et.IUl~ Jc>hNb . ti-241 - F~~ 1s.io13 MBMOTO r.LANNING COMMIS~ON A&$ APPLICA110M: $-,12-019 15928 UNION AVENUE;.L ANDS OF GRANT NEICHBORHOOD.'i)RAINAGE iS$UES/SOLiJTIONS The #PJ!liclU\t, M~~ 1~ Onl.nt a$ke(l ·us_.to_p~p&-t·R short ~e tP -ad4ressJ1¢.ighborh6G dnlinage concerns thatwere expressed.at the last hearing of January ~3, 20-il. In support of the analy.sis beloW. we have reviewed the Stormw~r T~~cnt Galculations prePllred by C-liffot4 BeClll~-~ Se;J!ternber ta . .2010 a.._chhe T.(>Wti of Los Gatos--En,girteecing {)esign Stant,fard$·-:-$eetiort 3, $.fpn1' Ofa~age{un~ted) . . J!p_§Jotm!fttet 'lf!!tment $ysta;.J)e.thJn - As recent aS 1~ 'years ~o. -st~ing water ~nded within a residential sideyard ' would hav:c .b~en .constdered failure of a stonn dramage sy~t_em. T,be phQtos ~ed by the nti.ghbor:. Mr. Mangano at th~ PC. heating were actualiy eviden« of a system. functioning J?r9PerlY• N~w: C~ :dnlinage ~tanf;im$ ~µj~ 'poll4~4 ~et tp b¢ hel4 W.id.!ln ~_Uow sW8ks for infiltration and -treatment m-$ite. ~ .the~event _of a moderate ~ .. luger .than •-.2 Y'.r ~oQtten~ pctibd• thi~ $}"~ ~ ~~.~ tQ · release .nmot'f t9\\18td ·~ public ·su-eCt. Thi'S. is -what QOCllrred on .~ber 2 a,nd l3. 20t2;, due to rainfall -intensitie's th~t ~ ~mparable to 2 and 5 y~r stf>rlru;. Note t'hat stQfill ru09.ff released by surface swaks to a public street.-without damage to structutes -or adjoin ing property. iS an ~~.{>~b1e m~ans of dis~h~rge µnder Town policy. u~~t~ly. 4~it:ig a D'~~r 2.bl2 $tQm~ tbe ,~mp ·p:ump $,~m ln$1alle4 at :11~ Part~'failed (Sue.to JU1 el~etr~ $.hPrt. ThiS dilai pwnp. S)istem is adcq~iy sited at a ~~ity -Of 120 gallons per minute (or 0.267 cubic· f~t pCf Sect>nd) to convey the I 0 year JimQif. frolri both t Hi & t 17 Pa:rto;airta. The etectricat .connection for the sump pump system ha$" since been raised by Mr. Grant to a'·oid ~ flitu~ failure. J..9cal Watershed Chgacteti,ties Tii¢ t(>poppey -0f BJQ$1;>ro -'Hill lli>ad at Ute inkrs.et.tion c,f Union Avenue iS such that • ~ skJC' of the intersection intereq>ts t'fle sa,rfa~ ftQws fu>m tl1e m;a~t hillside above, comprising a: watersht<i of approximately 25 acres (mcludia1g· Leewood Court). lh-~ unimproved fiVntage of th~ subject Pl!f1;<:l 1 or Uie ·Sllbdivis-ion has sen.-ed ns a default drainage S\Vale which aecepts a high volume of storm flows _afong east side of Uriion Avenue. Review of the Town GJS map, depicts a shallow swale at the center of .the Parcel I fton~ge thilt.convers nmoffnortheasterJy .~nd ditectiy at 112 Panrirarria Way. "776 TECHNOLOGY DRJVE. SAN JOSE. CA 95110 ~9300 MAIN 4~.9Jo1 FACSIMILE WWW..TSCIVILENG.COM Memo to PC Job No: 12-24 7 P#ge2 of3 January l 8, 2013 Given these bitekgrouod conditions, we consider Vnion Ave as a very b~ad but shallow drainage canal. As such1 the easterly side of the canal is incomplete and allows surface flow to escap; lhen run northeasterly across the applicant's property and next continuing directl ·to J i2 Panorama. · Parcei 1 Frontag.Improvemenn and Lot Re.Grading With the wi<lening of existing Uoipn Av~nue and the installation of cur~ and gutter with a new public inlel the existing ~beet flow, from tbe 25 acre watershed will be intercepted and conveyed from the new public drainage inlet to ibe 18" storm drain main within Union A venue. Th11t main was installed in aoout i 989 and has a capacity of approximately 18 CFS which is adequately .sized for a 10 ~ear .stonn to accept both the existing and proposed development. Additionally. the Parcel 1-lot grading design. will reverse d1.e slo~ of the lot from back to front, toward Union A venue: A grassy swal.e will intercq>t ~U on.,site. rupQff from the roof and paved areas and convey the storm runQff toward a newly installed private drainage Inlet at the nqrtheasJ:erly lot corner. The combination of both the completed frontage improvements a:nd the re-grading of the lot will serve to completely reduce the runoff presently directed at i 12 Panorama. These improvements wiil also serve to protect the other two new residences at 116 & 117 Panorama developed by Mr. Grant . 1776 lECHNOLOGY DRIVE •. SAN JOSE. CA 95 l l 0 408-452-9300 MAIN "108-452-9301 FACSIMILE WWW ,TSCIVILENG.COM Memo to PC Job No: 12~247 Page 3 of3 San~acy 1 $, 2.013 Summary The dlltil\~g~ system as d~~igned wiU ultfo1ately ~rv~ to meet the goals of property p~otection as required by Town drainage design poliq)'. We look.fonvatd to:~cootinued conside.ration oftbisappH~tion and will attend the nexthearing to reSJ>Ond to any questions regarding the matter. Sincerely~ TS/CIVJL ENGINEERING. INC. Te~nce J . Szewczyk,. P .E. Principal Engineer 1716 ~HNOLOGY O~IVE. SAN JOSE . CA 95110 G-<t52-93bo MAIN 408-452-930 1 FACSIMILE WWw.TSCIVILENG.COM This Page Intentionally Left Blank ( July 26, 2015 Mr. and Mrs. Darren T. Imai 15065 Blossom Hill Road Los Gatos, CA 95032 The Los Gatos Development Review Committee Community Development Department 110 E. Main Street Los Gatos, CA 95030 Attention: Jennifer Savage Dear Ms. Savage: RECEIVED JUL 2 6 2015 TOWN OF LOS GATOS PLANNING DIVISION I am writing regarding 15975 Union Avenue, subdivision application M-15- 001. Spe.cifically, we need to address an issue with the catch basin on sheets 4, 5, and 7 of the site plans at the southwest comer of the property on Blossom Hill Road. Essentially this c~tch basin collects water from a long stretch of Blossom Hill Road and dumps it on private property. It enters the catch basin, exits a large connecting pipe onto 15055 Blossom Hill Road and runs 200 feet downhill and under a fence to a large drain on our property at 15065 Blossom Hill Road. When we have any significant rainfall, it floods both my neighbors and our property. Both of us have had water in our garages on several occasions. The water flushes the leaves and debris that frequently collect on Blossom Hill Road, down into the drain on my property, blocking it completely. I clear the drain and it will flood again, often within minutes. The drain has to be monitored constantly during any rain event as a large volume of water literally rushes down the hill. This is essentially the dumping of storm water on private property. This was brought to the attention of Fletcher Parsons once before, but no action was taken. As 15975 Union Avenue is now being developed, it would seem the optimal time to correct this problem. The catch basin could be tied into the storm drain system. Ian Carney of Sycamore homes informed us that the sidewalk and gutter that-now dead ends in the catch basin, will be extended out to Union Avenue. This is great news, but will only help if the current catch basin and curb inlet are removed. Otherwise, the bulk of the water will continue to empty onto private property. !EXHIBIT 1 3 ( For the past 26 years, we have had to contend with this flood risk. We would like to respectfully request that the removal of the catch basin and curb inlet be incorporated into the ·plans. As illustrated in the accompanying photographs, the drainage system was very poorly designed. As the sidewalk and gutter are going to be extended as part of the developer's plan, incorporating this request should be easily accommodated. We spoke to Ian Carney, and showed him the drainage issues, when he came by to distribute the plans. He acknowledged that the current drainage system is not properly constructed. We appreciate your consideration of this request and look forward to an opportunity to discuss it with you. Unfortunately, we will be unavailable the day of the hearing, but will contact you to arrange a meeting. Thank you in advance for your attention to ·this matter. Darren and Shawn Imai cc: Mr. Ian Carney Sycamore Homes . 920 Thompson Place, Suite 130 Sunnyvale, CA 94085 Encl: Photographs \2._ .-2*-o..\ n \ n~ ~ C\.,\ \ ~ e,\-w ee(\ I t:!.a "1t:;' th~~ n A.,1p .• -·· A~~\-\\c'0'1.\ vlew ~ ' ·. fl r To: Los Gatos Planning Department From : Susanne and Tom Belshe RECEIVED AUG -·3 2015 TOWN OF LOS GATOS PLANNING DIVISION Re: Proposed Development of 15975 Union Av enue Planning Meeting·B/4/2015 I live on the street property adjacent to 15975 Union Avenue and acknowledge that there will be housed developed on the property but I have privacy concerns with the height and the layout of the current plan and drainage concerns. The proposed plan has 5'7" tall roofs on top of a two story house that will be raised even taller based on additional land fill add.ed to build up the elevation. For lot 3, the garage has a one-story portion and a two story portion. The roof for the one story garage (with natural elevation and land fill) is just shy of level with the top of 108 Lasuen Ct's second story roof. The second story (without the 5'7" roof) will feel like a 3rd story and the rooftop will tower further! This is not in the character of the neighborhood. We would like the town and the developers to consider lowering the elevation of the homes as well as add appropriate landscaping to screen us from having our new neighbors peer down onto us. In addition to privacy concerns, like many on a hillside, we have had our flooding issues with water flow. We have lived on this property for over 20 years and we have continually had underground water flow draining through our drains onto the street We are very concerned about increasing the preexisting water issue that we are already working hard to manage. To elevate the property further with landfill would seem to worsen rather than better the hillside water issues. Lastly, in order of not being redundant, I have not reiterated the comm~J;lts made by --. - Jan Murray but fully agree and support the comments regarding Town Code Section 29.40.410 (Height), Town Code.Section 29.40.405 (Yards), 24.50.065 (Sidewalks) POU HOU 2.5 (New single-family developments shall be compatible with the character of the surrounding neighborhood, as well as her comments on Dr ainage, Survey Makers and Story poles and existing vegetation and the Town Review and Approval Process. Sincerely, Susanne Belshe 408-356-6708 108 Lasuen Ct, Los Gatos, CA 95032 s usannebelshe@gmail .co m RECEt' -10 AUG 3·1015- _ NING Ol'VlSION 0~' OWN OF lO~ GAiOS ,... . f4 Jennifer Savage From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Hello Jennifer, Peter Costigan <pcostigan@yahoo.com> Monday, August 03, 2015 11:38 PM Jennifer Savage Jan Murray Proposed development at 15975 Union Ave This is Peter Costigan. I live at 104 Lasuen Ct, Los Gatos CA. This emaU is to register my concerns about the proposed development at 15975 Union Ave. First, I support the concerns of my wife, Jan Murray, who has communicated with you already. I have particular concern about the following issues, In general about the closeness and height of the new houses relative to our property, and about the commo~ roadway between our house and the new houses. 1. The impact to the privacy of our back yard at 104 Lasuen ct. The city of Los Gatos Residential Design Guidelines as published In 2008 draw a picture exactly llke what we will be experiencing. We have a very active back yard, with a swimming pool , trampoline, and barbecue area. That side of the house is also where our kitchen, family room, dining room and master bedroom look out. Here is a copy of the picture I refer to, on page 37 of the Guidelines: I' I I I; Avoid pladng windows in locations that would l0ok into adjacent neighbors~ windows or active privat.e yard spa.res So: do the plans show the north facing second story windows for all 3 houses having sills above head height or with frosted glass, as stated in the Design Guidelines? 2. The common road being Installed, apparently being referred to as a •shared driveway", Is immediately adjacent to our back fence . The new garages open directly onto the road ("driveway") with little or no setback . This common roadway ("driveway") raises a host of Issues. I think It is not well thought out. At a minimum I think it needs more space on both sides, for curbing on one side and a sidewalk on the other. I also would like to see some efforts by the developer to pay attention to the Los Gatos Residential Design Guidelines in regard to this common roadway. a) Los Gatos design guidelines : this lot layout is unlike any other homes in the Union Avenue neighborhood-those other homes on Union and the immediate cul de sacs of Leawood and Lasuen all have a garage set back at the end of a private driveway, where the driveway Is at right angles to the common roadway. I think the garages should be set back from the common roadway. b) Safety: if the currently planned common roadyway ("driveway") is considered wide enough for only one veh icle , it surely raises safety questions from the fire department and in accessing the two lots at the "back~ of the property away from Union . 1 c) Safety: if the currently planned drivewt.1 1s considered wide enough for two vehicles to pe:.~.s in opposite directions, then it supports two way traffic. How can you then call it a driveway? Won't a width wide enough for two way traffic encourage parking , which now returns us to the problem of the safety of one lane access to the back 2 lots? d) Safety: this "driveway• is the common and only access for both vehicle and foot traffic to the back 2 lots. Where is the sidewalk that would keep people , especially children, safe when both foot traffic and vehicle traffic are sharing the common road {"driveway")? e) Safety: Where is the curbing that will keep vehicles which enter the driveway and then will tum around 180 degrees to exit the driveway, either with or without the help of open garages, from hitting and damaging the fence across the common roadway from the houses, and perhaps rolling downhill through that fence into any of the neighboring properties? How many feet will that curb be from the fence? Again how can you call a common roadway in the middle of which all vehicles must somehow tum around to safely exit the property a "driveway"? f) Los Gatos Design Guidelines about minimizing exterior lighting impact on neighbors: The houses are close to the road ("driveway") and the garages are closer. ft is very standard to see significant lighting from houses onto garage entrances, "driveways", and 2nd story buildings on their main entrance side. Please note: whatever claim a builder may make about the main entrance or "front door" being on the other side {south side) of the properties from the "driveway", since the "driveway• is the only access, clearly the north side facing the road ("driveway") will be the main (most frequently used) entrance to all of the houses. Some people are also very likely to install motion sensors and timers that brighten garage entrances and that will brightly light driveways . In short, the entire entrance road ("driveway") area will likely be lit by bright lights and those lights will likely be going on and off all night We at 104 Lasuen, and our neighbors on either side , have main areas of our houses facing South towards the about to be installed lighting. Here I refer to kitchens, breakfast areas, master bedrooms, family rooms, porches, and high activity private yard spaces. The current design Is clearly going to maximize , not minimize, exterior lighting impact on neighbors. Thank you for your attention. Sincerely, Peter D. Costigan Jr. 2 August 2, 2015 To: Town of Los Gatos Development Review Committee Subject: August 4, 2015 -Public Hearing Agenda Item #3, 15975 Union Avenue Subdivision, Architecture, and Site Applications cc: Jennifer Savage, Senior Planner Town of Los Gatos RECEIVED AUG -·'.-1 2015 TOWN OF LOS GATOS PLANNING DIVISION I am Orville Bues:ing residing at 15892 Union Avenue for the past 42 years . There have been five properties developed along the intersection of Union A venue and Blossom Hill Road :in the past twenty- five years. In each case, adjacent properties have been negatively impacted with drainage issues and obstruction of views of the hills. I request that these appUcations be referred to the Town of Los Gatos Planning Commission to be reviewed as separate Site and Architectural Applications independent of each other. The 15975 Union development applications display similar lack of concern for impact to neighborhood properties. Some items of neighborhood concern are: 1. This proposed three lot with a shared driveway has all the characteristics of a Flag Lot proposal . The Town of Los Gatos is on record for not supporting flag lots. Saying that the front of these homes faces Blossom Hill Rd without any access from Blossom Hill certainly is a humorous concept. A request for a flag lot at the 15928 Union development which is just across the street was denied only a few years ago. While technicalities can be listed, a twenty foot wide driveway servicing three properties is not safe should emergency services be required. These homes will each have multiple cars and it is very likely that one or more cars will be parked along the driveway and creating an unsafe condition if fire and/or medical vehicles need to enter. Perhaps a two lot development is better. 2. The proposed homes are shown at a two story 28.5 foot height. The grading for the three proposed pads show pads 2 and 3 graduating 4 feet each above pad 1. Lot three will have a finished floor height of over 8 feet above lot 1. This overall height will look and feel to adjacent neighbors like it is a three story house. Two story houses built in this area are typically h~ve a 22 to 25 foot height and are built on lots that have lower elevation levels. If a three lot proposal is approved, perhaps the house on lot three could be limited to single story. 3. Drainage in this area is critical. Most all homes :in years have sump pumps and experience dampness under their homes year around, even with the recent drought. For some reason the Town has taken the position that drainage issues are only because of surface water runoff. Ask long-time residents and you will hear that in addition to storm water, the fact is that soil tests show solid Clay for many feet and results in minimizing any percolation. The water table in the area is very high and in a normal weather year, the high water table results in flooded crawl spaces. 4. The proposed plan shows a six inch pvc drain pipe along Union and another 6 inch pvc drain pipe along the north side of the property with swales built using pervious soil in the middle of the driveway . ·What calculations were used to establish a six inch pipe to be adequate? The other adjacent developed properties had requirements that were more than double this six inch size pipe. Also, a question to ask is what provisions will be in place requiring the property owners to maintain these drainage across the rear and side of their property. For the 15982 Union development, the Planning Commission and Town Council required that each deed have this maintenance as a condition of ownership. 5. Use of Walls: The plans show many walls around the property. A concern of neighbors is the continued proliferation of walls along Union. Plastered walls bounce traffic noise and are create noise similar to highway 85. Perhaps a vegetated hedge to absorb the sound would be more environmentally conservative. Again, I request that the Development Review Committee forward these applications to the Planning Commission for a full and complete vetting. Thank you, Orville Buesing 15892 Union A venue Los Gatos, Ca 95032 To: Jennifer Savage and the town of Los Gatos planning department From: Jan Murray Re: Proposed development of 1597 5 Union Ave . -housing plan RECEIVED AUG -.3 2015 TO~ OF LOS GATOS PLANNING DIVISION To the planning committee of the Town of Los .Gatos and the architecture team for 15975 Union Avenue, . . I am a neighbor to 15975 Union Ave. l have been in contact with the developer Ian Carney periodically since March. Ian has been very responsive to my inquiries and has provided immediate neighbors with a proposed development plan. At this time, I still have concerns about the proposal of record. I request that Ian's development group make changes to the project in keeping with existing town codes and the town's development plan. Even with those changes , I have continued concerns for the engineering department regarding the hillside development of a flag lot project with regard to ongoing drainage management and underground springs management, as well as other city services and safety routes on Union Avenue. · Here is a a list of some of issues identified based on the April development plans for the housing and the current story pole sample. I will address proposed changes for Union Avenue in a separate memo. 1. Town Code Section 29.40.410 Height The proposed houses on lots 2 and 3 exceed the town code for height. The planned roofline is approximately 35 feet above existing elevation topography. These houses are too high and have too large of a profile. The proposed construction .plan including elevation land fill and structures would change the actual sunset time on Lasuen Ct properties as demonstrated on August 2nd when at approximately 6:20pm the sun set-behind the Lot 3 story pole structure : natural sunset was officially 8:15pm. Limiting of daylight hours due to manmade, controllable options is unreasonable and the town should not allow such unnecessarily high and large structures in the neighborhood. 2, ToWI1 Code Section 29.40.405 Yards For R-1: l 0,000 the minimum front yard is 25 ft. Thes~ proposed houses violate the town CQde by placing the front yard (with extra large 3 car garages 720 sq ft) within 2-3 feet of the proposed road. That's over 20 feet of violations, which is an 80%+ violation, not a minor accommodation. This proposed street is. too close to the Lasuen Ct. lot lines. 3. Town Code Section 24.50 .065 Sidewalks (and POU HOU 2.4) Sidewalks are required in subdivisions with lots less than 20,000 sq feet unless its a hillside ... etc. This proposal does not include a sidewalk for the street in the subdivision. 4. Town Code Section 24.50.065 Off-street parking on Narrow Streets (see also POU HOU 2 .4) The proposal does not provide sufficient off-street parking. It appears that they are proposing to use the Lasuen Ct. development off-street parking instead of providing their own. 5. POU HOU 2.5 ''New single-family <list omitted> developments shall be compatible with the character of the surrounding neighborhood. These over-tall, large facade, elevated homes plan creates structures that tower over and above the neighborhood. This proposal clearly is not in keeping with the surrounding neighborhood. (Options for single story and 2-story beautiful home designs can be created with smaller exterior structures. Refer to Panorama development where adequate 2 story homes were built on existing elevation to under 24 feet.) 6. Drainage-This property is located within the Wild Lands zone designation. Although hillside zoning codes are not strictly required here, changes to the property should be considered with the same considerations of hillside development including. but not limited to, runoff, structure stability, fire management and access. The existing developments do not have adequate drainage during storms and for managing the water table changes. This new development should provide greater drainage capacity in order to meet minimum needs of this hillside changes and the existing underground springs . In addition, as a downhill homeowner I require assurance that no changes to the hillside will impact my property including the house foundation, pre-existing swimming pool, and vegetation. These assurances should be included as liability coverage in the developer 's insurance plan and the future homeowners' deeds to cover responsibility for any future damages to my property resulting from changes to 15975 Union. 7. Survey markers and story poles and existing vegetation: The survey markers and story poles do not adequately communicate to community members the p roperty lines, proposed topography manipulations, loss of vegetation, proposed access paths, and proposed structures. Please make the site proposal mar.kings clearer for community review. 8. Town Review and Approval Process: This project has several challenges; it is a residential flag lot, hillside development at an intersection that is overloaded by nonlocal traffic at peak commute hours. Development here should receive the full review process by the town planners, engineers and safety experts. On the surface it appears that this project is undergoing minimum town oversight rather than maximum. I urge you to visit this site during morning and evening commute between from mid- September through Nov ember to observe the full impact of the potential changes prior to approving specific modifications to topography, streets, services, and structures. Please do take time to visit the site. Feel free to contact me for an appointment to come into my backyard and view the site as it relates to the nei ghborhood. Sincerely, Jan Murray Jennifer Savage From: Sent To: Cc Subject: Je_nnifer: ( thomas mangano <mangano.thomas@gmail.com> Thursday, July 30, 2015 2:59 PM Jennifer Savage 'Orv Buesing'; 'themas mangano' Concerns on the 15466 Los Gatos application Thank you for an impromptu meeting with Orv and myself this morning. I have been in my residence for 40 years at 112 Panorama Way and have been actively involved in many of the planning hearings because of my deep concern that I have for the drainage problems in our general area . There has been one common thread in virtually all the developments between Blossom Hill Road and Anne Way in our immediate area and that is the lack of concern for drainage and the acctual realization of the area's drainage issues. As a result 15466 Union is another application with the maximum proposed number of homes and the proposed size of the home's FAR and impervious area being maxed out, in an area with a topology conditions and soil conditions that may be better suited to ha~e a more conservative development because .of the drainage conditions that the current existing homes must accommodate. I realize that the .15466 Union Application is going to DRC review next Tuesday. I would hope that DLC denies the application or forwards · the application to the Planning Commission so that the applicant can better address my drainage concerns. Additlonally, given that the applicant Is using Blossom Hill Road to support the fact that the proposed subdivision map is not creati"ng "corridor lots" (section 29.10.085} yet the direct "paper access" onto Blossom Hill is not used and an easement corridor Is being created for the individual home traffic/car access. I would ask that the town review the following court rulings and Los Gatos ordinances to see if the develop-er is using designated zoning frontage for two uses (setback and access} to maximize the FARs and Is fact skirting court laws, for the benefit of the developer only. 1 Loveladies Property Owners Ass'n, Inc. v. Barnegat City Service Co., 60 N.l. Super. 491 (App. Div. 1960); 2 Kefauver v. Zoning Bd., 151 Conn. 144 (1963). "What can a developer do If Its development requires the precious square footage contained within those easement areas to meet zoning requirements? A close reading of the case law reveals that courts usually analyze whether the developer can use the easement area for Its proposed use. In Kefauver, the court refused to allow use of the easement area because "the easement effectively prevents [the applicants] from usi ng · any part of the macadamized service road as a front yard for their enterprise ... . " Sometimes, this analysis focuses on the definition of the term "lot." In Loveladies, the ordinance defined the term "lot" as "land on which a main building and its accessory buildings are or may be placed, together with the required open spaces, the location, dimensions and boundaries of which are shown on the records of Ocean County." Based on this definition, the court found that the easement areas, which could neither be built upon nor categorized as open space, were riot part of the "lot." However, the court noted that the municipality could amend its ordinance to specifically allow the use of such areas in calculating "lot" requ irements . 1 Before moving forward \-•• ch an application that includes a lot c. ... .itaining road easement areas or a potential roadway dedication, a developer must closely examine the applicable zoning ordinance, -and particularly the definition of the term "lot," to determine if the ordinance permits the use of such areas to meet yard and setback requirements. If it does not, the developer should not run the risk of obtaining an Invalid approval by including the area in its lot requirement calculations. Even if the land use board agrees to allow the developer to use the easement areas in its calculations, the developer should either seek a v.ariance or go thro.ugh the formal ordinance amendment process to avoid a third-party attack on the approval's validity. Although a variance request would Increase the developer's burden of proof and an ordinance amendment could slow the development process, these options would better serve a developer seeking to protect the approval rights in its development" Thank you, tom mangano 112 Panorama Way, Los Gatos, CA 95032 2 Jennifer Savage From: Sent: To: Subject Ron Duncan <ron.duncanl@yahoo.com> Tuesday, August 04, 2015 8:52 AM Jennifer Savage 15975 Union Ave development project To: Jennifer Savage, Town of Los Gatos Planning Department From : Ron Duncan , 105 Lasuen Ct, Los Gatos Dear Jennifer, I live close to the proposed project on 15975 Union avenue that will be discussed in the Los Gatos Town Planning Meeting on August 4th at 1 Oam. Unfortunately, I cannot attend the meeting, but I would like to register a few concerns about the project. Specifically, I encourage the planning committee to ensure that the development plan take$ into account downhill drainage, and Union Avenue traffic . Drainage: As a downhill neighbor, I'm asking the planning department to ensure that the 15975 Union project takes into account the needs for adequate drainage during heavy storms . Our property on Lasuen Court receives runoff from neighboring uphill properties which can be significant -even in moderate storms. In little-to-moderate rain, our sump pumps are activated to pump away water flowing downhill near our house. During heavy rains, the amount of drainage can be significant. We have had two instances where our pumps failed and we've had flooding and water damage in the lower level of our house. Union Ave Traffic: This project is very close to the Union/Biossom Hill inter-Section. Traffic on Union avenue backs up during commute hours. I encourage the Los Gatos planning department to visit and view the traffic patterns In person. Please ensure that this project includes a sidewalk and sufficient off-street parking so that It does not add to the current congestion problems. Best Regards, Ron Duncan 105 Lasuen Court, Los Gatos 1 This Page Intentionally Left Blank Jennifer Savage To: Jennifer Savage Subject: RE: concerns regarding structure size and height on 15975 Union From: Susanne Belshe [mailto:susannebelshe@gma ll.coml Sent: Wednesday, Decembe r 02, 2015 12:45 PM To: Erin M. Walters Cc: Jan Murray; Joni Gimlan; Peter Costigan; Gideon and Joni Gimlan SUbject: Re: concerns regarding structure size and height on 15975 Union Hi Erin, After our meeting last moth, I am still concerned about the height of the structures. I am happy that they are no longer raising the floor base -but would like to see a reduction floor to ceiling heights (the second floor is 9'4" and the first floor is 1 O' 1" and the room is 6' 7"). ~e entire building (to tallest point) is 28' 1 O". This is 3' 1 O" taller than the Lasuen Court houses who are already sunken to the property by at least 4 feet -so they really tower over us. Thanks, Susanne On Dec 2, 2015, at 11:39 AM, Erin M. Walters <EWalters@losgatosca.gov> "Wrote: Good Afternoon Jan, Thank you for your email. The revised story poles will be installed by the end of this week reflecting the modifications to ·the height and location of the proposed homes. Revised shadow studies and plans have been submitted for staff review reflecting the two days of the year June 21 (summer solstice) and December 21st (winter solstice), at three different times of day 9am, Noon and 3pm. These dates are when shadows are at their longest and shortest. I am working on getting a reduced hard copy of the revised plans or a digital copy for you. The revised full sized plans are available for review in the Planning Office Monday through Friday 8 am. to 1 p.m. Please let me lmow if you have questions. Sincerely, Erin Walters Associate Planner Community Development Department 110 E Main Street Town of Los Gatos Direct Phone: 408-354-6867 Main Phone: 408-354-6872 Website: http://w"ww.losgatos ca .gov/897 /Planning Community Development Counter Hours: 8:00AM -l :00 PM, Monday-Friday l Please note the upconiing 1·own closure: December L4, 2Ut:> -January 1, 2016 ~ Think Green, please con sider t he environment before printing this e-mail. The information contained in -this email may be privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable low. Tile information is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use, dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, or are not the named recipient(s), please notify the sender immediately by reply email and delete this message from your computer. Thank you . From: Jan Murray [mailto:alwaysmurrayjl@yahoo .com] Sent: Tuesday, December 01, 2015 4: 13 PM To: Erin M. Walters Cc: Susanne Belshe; Joni Gimlan; Peter Costigan; Gideon and Joni Gimlan Subject: concerns regarding structure size and height on 15975 Union Dear Erin, Hello, I hope this note finds you well and that you have enjoyed your Thanksgiving break . I am writing today to document my ongoing concern about the height and size of the proposed development on 15975 union. Please note that at 3:40pm today, Dec. 1, the sun went down beneath the top of story pole structure on lot 3i blocking the sun from my property long before the natural landscape wi l be doing this. Although the architectural plans include a shadow study, I do not think that the shadow study provides a sufficient description of the potential impact to Lasuen court (addresses 100, 104, and 108) by the proposed 3-lot development plan with 29ft tall large surface area homes. Is there any information that will describe the anticipated changes to sunset and sunrise times for the homes on Lasuen court? (Susane and Joni, please let me know if you are seeing an impact to ,your daylight hours as well. I'll try to keep a record for us to help the architect understand more clearly the areas of concern.) Thank you, Jan 2 From: Susanne Belshe <susannebelshe@gmail.com> Subject: 15975 Union Avenue Plans Date: January 20, 2016 at 5:37:44 PM PST To: Jennifer Savage <jsavage@losgatosca.gov> Cc: Jan Murray <alwavsmurrayjl@yahoo.com> hi Jennifer, RECEIVED M·19~r JAN 2 0 2016 ~-I•-~~ -~-19-(') I\ TOWN OF LOS GATOS PlANN ING DIVI SION This is a follow up email regarding the planned homes on 15~75 Union Avenue. As I mentioned before, my family and I live in an impacted home on 108 Lasuen Ct, Los Gatos. After reviewing the revised plans dating November 24, 2015 I have the following concerns: 1. The houses are too large in terms of height. They tower over their neighboring homes. The only reduction they have implemented has been a result of the change of the floor base due to the city's requirement for a different drainage solution. I don't understand why the first floor needs to be 10'1" tall! Ideally, I would like to see the entire home height reduced! If that isn't possible, would they consider at least lowering the height of the garage (it is 11' 2" tall!) This would at least reduce the mass that is closest to Lasuen Ct homes (the garages). I realize that this would cause the 2nd floor to be bi-level but they have so much unnecessary vertical space add here to avoid adding the steps (11 '2" tall ceiling in the garage, and duct space in both the floor and ceiling!) 2. I am coi:lcerned about fire truck access with current road design. I believe that the CC&R excludes anyone from parking in the driveway of lot 3 so that a firetruck can tum around. How on earth will this be enforced? It is easy for the builders to agree to such terms, but almost impossible for the owners to actually abide by them. 3. Page A4-3 dated November 19 show significant shadow from lot 2 over our backyard and house dming the winter. Thank you, Susanne Belshe 108 Lasuen Ct Los Gatos 408-356-6708 From: Jan Murray and Peter Costigan To: Erin Walters, the DRC and Planning Commissiori Re : Review of Proposed Development of 15975 Union Ave Date:1/20/2016 Thank you so much for working with us and the developer to resorve concerns of issues that impact our home and neighborhood. Fire Safety: The updated plan to include CC&Rs that ensure proper fire truck access to all 3 homes on the flag drive helps allay concerns along with the approval of the Fire Department. We would like to see the CC&Rs to understand how the driveway access path will be kept clear. Also, it appears that Lot 3 has no guest parking at all, which could result In guests parking on the shared driveway or in the fire truck turn around. Would it make sense to alter the plans for Lot 3 to add guest parking like that of Lot 1 and Lot2? One option is to remove the single car garage leaving that space open for guest parking. Safety along the flag driveway: I understand that there is a curb along the Lasuen side of the flag driveway. I remain concerned that a large vehicle could back over the curb and go through the fence Into my property. How will this be prevented? Rain water and ground water management: Because this property sits uphill from several neighboring homes, and because of preexisting groundwater issues experienced by neighboring homes, addressing runoff ls essential to the success of developing this sloped property. My thanks to you and the developers for all the work to ensure that the rain water run off and ground water conditions are fully understood by the town and the developers. We appreciate that you all have reviewed the historical data as well as the anecdotal descriptions from the neighbors in order to make updates that enhance the water management plan for the significant changes that will be made to this property. Because the success of the water management engineering solution will lie in future homeowner compliance, the content and clarity of the CC&Rs will be essential. Could you please provide us with the planned content for the water flow maintenance CC&Rs to review? Height and Mass Impact on Neighbors: At 104 Lasuen, we are very impacted by the proposed development because we are the middle house on Lasuen. Our house was built with the first floor oriented toward the south for light while the east and west sides are blocked by neighbors. The north side is in near constant shade. As stated in earlier memo to the town, the new homes as proposed sit on an incline above my home and they are several feet taller than my home. They were towering over, blocking our view of the hill tops of Los Gatos and some of our view just of the sky. The proposal originally had the houses so close that that they cast significant shade into my property. The developers took our feedback and have made some changes, to the topography plan and positioning of the homes, that have improved the proposal from my perspective. I appreciate these changes, and the repositioning of the story poles to reflect the changes has been very helpful also. Even with these changes, the proposed homes are extremely tall, relative to my home, and all Lasuen Ct homes, as well as the neighboring homes on Blossom Hill. You can see on the plans that the proposed second story floor elevation is nearly at the Lasuen rooflines. I'd really appreciate it if the developers would reduce the overall height of the homes. The proposed house plans still include ceiling heights on the first floor In excess of 1 o feet and on the second floor the ceilings are 9ft 4". These ceilings are much higher than needed (by most humans) and likely also require more power per cubic foot to heat and cool. Reducing the ceiling height seems like a win -win-win solution. Union Ave Traffic management and road striping : We have concerns about the safety of Union Avenue access for Lasuen Ct and Leawood Ct. during peak hours. It will be very helpful to have Union Avenue clearly striped as a 2-lane road with side parking and bike access .to minimize the number of drivers who treat Union Avenue as a 4-lane .road. RECEIVED '""1-\"1-~( JAN 2 0 2016 ~ .. \c;,-c\\ TOWN OF LOS GATOS PLANNING DIVISION From: Gideon Glmlan [mailto:gglmlan@yahoo.com] Sent: Thursday, January 21, 2016 10:07 AM To: Erin M. Walters Cc: Joni Gimlan RECEIVED M-1~ ... eol JAN 21 2016 $· ,~ .. coq -s ... ,,.,~\ TOWN OF LOS GATOS PLANNING DIVISION Subject: Traffic reconfiguration plans for Union Ave. Southbound at Blossom Hill Road Dear Erin, We have lived at 100 Lasuen Court for the past 28 years (since 1988). Our bedroom window faces Union Ave. Southbound one block before it intersects with Blossom Hill Road. For the past 28 years the roadway adjacent to our bedroom was a parking area blocked by a physical traffic barrier placed just North of where the 3 new homes are scheduled to go up (in the property munediately South of us). As a result, no traffic came up that parking area to make a right turn onto Blossom Hill Road. We are given to understand that the Town plans to drastically alter that situation by talcing down the physical barrier and elongating the right turn lane so that it become contiguous with what has been for more than 28 years (even before we moved here) a parking only area. We are given to understand that the Town plans to paint onto the roadway, arrows suggesting to motorists that they merge to the left before they make that right tum from Union Ave. Southbound onto Blossom Hill Road. Of course motorists will simply ignore that suggestion. It will be a mere joke. As a result we will be subjected to increased traffic fumes (including from diesel vehicles waiting by our bedroom window to make the right on red), increased noise from blaring radios and unmuftled motorcycles. We are also given to understand that the Town plans to paint onto the roadway, a bicycle lane in the middle of the roadway so that bicyclists can make a left tum from Union Ave. Southbound onto Blossom Hill Road. That will further push a flow of two lane car traffic towards our bedroom window and encourage accidents to happen as motorists are not accustomed to having a bike lane in the middle of a two-way road as opposed to adjacent to the curb. We are asking the town to change these plans, to place a bicycle lane and a physically blocked parking area adjacent to our property (thus preserving the quality of living it has had for 28 years) as opposed to encouraging a greater flow of two lane noisy, smoky traffic to flow directly adjacent to our bedroom. We hope that you give our request fair consideration. Sincerely yours, Joni and Gideon Gimlan (408) 315-3185 (cell number) ,. This Page Intentionally Left Blank LOTl VICINITY MAP LOT2 SITE DATA Wl"IH4': erre JlllU!A <~J: (NET): Sl!'T'CHAAT UNION "~ JOINT ~ l"'A!'.TNl!ReMlf' CIO c:is~I ~Ft.OUP $40! l"IR5T !ITRel!T l-06 "1. Tall, G.l... 4'!022 1~ UNION AV!!NU!! 1.o5 .,,,.TGl5, c;,.. '!50~ -~~-c 1 i ~1 :10 '425 ,10• !IP' (.'I"! AG) AVcr.. ~ 10.95% =511,!IC!O !IP' (~ ~) AV6'. !11.af'e "J."111% PROJECT DIRECTORY ~ITl!e1": ICO+i.6NIT '• "'8110e1ATl!e !11 UlllllllV>ITY AVllNUll. l!>UITll L. l."'9 <&A1""9, GA 'ftl<:l!IO ~(40&)-- ~.....C:Hl'TlleT: <&-l.Zl'le ~I! •'•••.c+m·11e,. "186P"""""-y 9.ANTA ~ GA '!90e!J Tl!L• '"1) -4a-414"J ec:>IL.-- ~IL.IGQM "~!>OIL. l!N<&IN-- 2e<!1 -R.C»D, !SU~ e!IO --.GA Tl!I..: (40&) 11:34-1C>O CMk l!MINCl!ll! H-..MUNllT"!l i61111!15~­•IJ.AO'I'. c>o oeo.:io TI!l.1 (.olC&) IMQ-21'19 ......-eT ~IGM-<&-l!R ~~'TIN& --'1'6~ l".O. eox 1010 P'llL. TON, GA .Ot& (1191)991-'" SCOPE OF WORK PROJECT DATA TOTAi.. I.Di ARl!ill ~ 4!1,104 SQ l"T. r;:>eC)IGATION i ,!514 !IQ f"T, Nl!:T 55,9<!0 eel! FT. .............................................................................................................. !1Jm!1 wouee "AJOP. • .119 -c 1a.;/ x .2 J •• 119 -.o• •. a&i .211i" 12.BP». ie.&q& !fil .-111" Al'l. • .10 X (12:$9 X .o-tl • .10-,Q:z:a • .016 '°"'" 12,1166•11.00'4 eP! ~•n•wc::ru~AL.~I! • 11,1it.lll' -STIWC.~ ~I!. 2 ,'9&111' IMl"l!R'<'ll:IUa ~ • ,&,6&6 &I' MAK.lollll$1T~(l!)QllO.~~ l'tl~ le L.Drel". 2"T'-1 " ' . ... erri!':f,,, ... , ............. ~ .................. , ...... ,,.,,,, , ............ , ....................... , !llTB -• 1t ,Y1 91' A\lllO.A<&ll~&.ao'll!o ~~( n::;e i< .z I• .11!1-.011 •.llOO .soo x 11.H2 • jD,"406 i!Sl*I •-• l"AR..•.l" x~x CTI• .10-.01a • .oi& .0&2 "11,!1112, ~ ~L.1!~~~1!•4,IMC~F ~~'l'UllVoL. ~1!•2 ,'1~91' IMl"llR~~ll•&,"lrllil" MAX.Hl!l&HT~(l!JQll0.~6~ l'tltc;Hil!Yl!R le 1-QN!eT ~ :z6'..q" ~-· Flll81' ~ 1,646 S F ~~,.~16 ···emfif .. , .... , ............ = .................. , .... ,., .. ~ ....... , ..... ,,, ...................... ,,, lllTl!-•11,91H191" ... ~eL.OPll'I.- ~~· HOU!I! t'AK~·[ 11;s x .2 1 s .99 -.cs !II .eoo .aoo" 11.e:z. IS.006 M"I .s-11 F.All. • .10 x C11~ x CTI• .10-.01& • .o-ta .0&2X11,!l!l:I• ~ ~enwc:.Tlll'AI.. ~ • 4 ,IM1 91" ~9'l'!lllGTU"'611. ~lli • 2.ae:z Ill' IM~~l!•4.1l!l2!11" l'IMHel6HT~(l!JQllO.~~ l'tltc;~ Ill i-Ql'aT • 2"T'-I!>" LOT3 AN APFROVE) RESIC'l:NilAI. Flllte SPRINKl-ER SYSTEM GOMFL."r"ING ~ITH NFFA 131:' SHAU.. SE INSTA!.L.!t' THROUGHOUT ALL. a Fl.l!Sll:'eNCES. .-C.1 ~ C2 ~ ~ c:;e ~ c:.i c:.& c:.'! C:.10 C:.11 l.D1" 1 A1 .1 A1.2 A1.5 A1.4 Al.It A 1.6 l.D1" 2 "2.1 "2.2 "2.8 A2A "2.9 "2.6 .bQ!A AS.1 A!l.:Z AS,5 AS.-4 AS.It AS.6 ~91+~ C:.ML. Tr!'\Z ~a!'!" SHEET INDEX 15LIJ~NT !'CR A ~N BA'!' ST~~~-NOTe l:'eMOUTION P'l...AN TeNTA~MN' .......011'1• ANP ti!UJ~I! l"t.AN •l'VO!N• AND ~l~I! !"I.AN ~~ ~TION!o 5T~ Pl'VllN EIN>IN l"L.AN 1!111.0elON c::.oNT1'0L. l"LAN P'llQT P'L.QOlll. ~ ~DP'L...Oolll.1"1-AN lllQOP'~ l'RONT 4 L..al'T l!L.b/'ATTONlt A IUAA 4 11.t•HT l!U!VA'T10N& '°' c:fl.OH e~,,ON!l Pt!UT P'L..c:lOR P'LAN ~ PLOOll. f'~ ~P'LAN ~T' e U5'T l!U!VA'T10N ~ 411.lS+!T l!U!VATk'N 5Z!c:.TION9 P'lRST P'1..0Q!t PL.AN ~ FL.Oallt PLJooN !tOOP' PLAN f'lltQNT I ~ l!li\/ATIONS lteAA 4 ~15t+T l!UWATIONS ~TIONS -!MAL.·~ M.1 Nl!IGH-HOOD PL.;t.N M..2!!1~ M.S !lll'+~ S1°UC"f """"' arrl!eet:.TIOl'4t} "'· !!!, e 1.1 Pi...o.NT1N5 P'l.HI 1.:2 l!Xl!!ITIN6 ~!AT THIS P~JeGT IS L.OGATED IN TH!! ~IL.PL.ANO UfilleAN INTeRFAC.E ZONE < \LJ u . rll ~ 0 t;: Ei-t Cl r:n ~ < g ril ~ > s \LJ ~~ r:n Ill ~z ffi <0 ~ '""'4 ~ z ~ ~ "1 r-a- Vi - DATE: 11/1111\'J SCAU<Hif 1Dti"""'4 Sl!e6T AO.l 1 OF - EiH.IBIT 1 4: . ---~··-.... ~. _...,;_ mfltll.R nlVAllOft ~ w.\lER MAW .....,&r'.W••..._srm ¥"'1et..t•~wr:~DR ,. -· 1111' l/f QJRIJ fi£W.'IOI iW -l'FE •IMJ!T. !lFIAllOll !'!"~ ~-· ... -c-..·· 1-liilM ~ .... ---...... ~ '• @ • .. .., • el£VATioM '1llP . l/f. CJlillE 'EllVATIOM ci~~ncw ~'*· l!RllPK£T llNfflE l:lAW KW WlilEf 11E1ER fff:'ll'l!JR.illr •llRVM.i£ ==~=-' SUWAIJ( -----l'E!llCN.,CUllB =====CIJlll.lll1JTT!JI ;._....;.....,:_..;.;.._;"-.JOllT 1R!NCH ...... ____ RrnlllNO Ml. EDIAlWL m "' E si<ii ~ Tentative. Map Grading & Drainage· Plans HOlE:. -M; flW: llf-HNCNll-·a liRUllf;T11 l)(ES: llO:r:Pll!Mll£ i;tllSllM;1ION STIJ<El;. SM> -·l!Ll. AS'JU•E ~ ~ON~lillTY .Hl'ScE\fJ! f,Oll ~ :COilSTllUC1W ~ NOJE m. OONMACJOR C'.l!r.!>>.Cl!lll '~· °™-'T M'. 5!l'l!l. ~JYE; sotE A!!~ .Clll!l".£!£ Rei!'ll!llllllTY nit! ·'Ill· S!1E :.:8.1=.~:s~·M~~n::~MJ" .. l!XI · 10 NlRMI. llCRICINll:~ ANl mAf 1ftE Ca.MIACl!llt Slffil. Dm!ID. INDSIHFV All! HOl.D ·l!IE O!Nll Ntl H :EIQIED! tlARILEli& !llllltAlfr .!IG :Alli llAlllJJ'f. l!lM.Cll! ~IN aNIEC'llClll lilllt !It~.~ l/f. ~ON ll:IS. l'llOBT, El1CEP111G 111!.UHllJIY Wi!Nll fl!lll M; sw:·IElllG94CE'l/f 1HE O'MI! GR ENllNEER. · · · · · · · for 15975 Union Aven :ue In the Town of Los Gatos S8Flta Clara CouAty, California llmE;,, · ~· NO'IU: stWL BE 'PIUMIJE) ID NmHiaimll: Pll!:JRRTY OlifEllS NID SCHOots l/f · 1£A'IY alll$1llUC11fM ACIMTl!S-MD HEA'l'r CllNSIRUCTlOI( S111UC llllT ST.ll!T ll&illiE ll:JO. All · ON DA\'SHll SQllJClS.~ llUESSION. HO COllSTRIJ~ IS~Cll ~lS. _DA1!;!-• 1$ -~~./llltl~ BENCHMARK ·'llG Pl.ANs ARE lil2D I»! M111tN l/f UlS 'OAlllS IEllCltlWIK. SEllClliW'< 111'. LQ24 ~~~tBFfET lESClll'1llll: !£? lrlASS DISK .. ~ llEt!. STR \spl! LOQ.llOI(: ~l/f~HUllllN:lNllr.llllltOllECRO BASIS dF:BEARINGS '1IG PIAllS .!l!E.:llASEIHlll :M:·~ Of Uli!Jij_ A~ M S:lallll'.OI( 11£1£: M!!J AS NOllJll rf!' 1T 'Jf!' llE$J. aooozQNE . swtM~~t =="':;,.~~ ~1~ l!llQ.ECT:IS:~~ IN: Zlll!::X!GQ· iiHX!OO 'AN 1flEA IHUllAlEl llY 500-.'1£AR ~;AN MIEJ.. INl.M)A1!IJ IJi'. 100-'l!AU\.OOlllllG .11111M AllllA~ D!l'!llS OI' USS 111AN 1 FOOT Oii *111 ~·M:e ~ lfSS·llWI . f 9lllMRE 11£i' OR AN .IA£A A!01ECml BY lNIS M 100'-'IWI Fl.OOOIJlll. . . ~ ooWD!lliOllP · 341. FRS1' STRfEI· 1,W Alll!S, CA 94022 ~IQIE$,CQ\I CIVIL EN.GINEER HAHHA ;a llUIEl'a. Jq BGIDfll!Y SlRIIT "IUD'r', l:A"t!llZll " .. CFFICE: 40IJ .. ~-2)73 FAll: 40S 1142--Jeel ·EIMll:~ ARCHIJECJ KDIU.V.T II ASSOCIAE 51~;\QJE;\' lllSOATOS. '!A~ mia:a:-.~ . lANQscAPE ARCHIJECT QQal'I cDIS 131 PAMll WAY S.INTA Cl!Ul. CA 95111~ -~.!DI :U!H747 SHEET IN[)EX aM:R SHEE1' 2 Bl.UEPRltr Of A lltEAN BAI' 3 GRADING 'NaTEs AND ;STORM· WATER lREAlMENf DETAIL 4 · DEM<ll110N :Pl.AN 5 ~TAll~ ~,\!' !5-1 ~ADING . AND DftAINAGE Pl.AN S-:!i' · miJjs t. llETM.s .to smiU WAlEll UNIMaltNT FUii H · ERQSION ; COHlJiOUVJf ;8l!D'J'; 01"11 ·~-~~---" ~-·-·-·--~ ,._. __ _ --~~ Ol.l._M ,. ___ _ -~~-..-,:,=:-·:.~= =°"""--~ .. _ (~~ '"'*"'~·~ ......... .. ~.~ .. !Ml<lhal.lllltll ......,, c.::::n::: tH {G)-7Xl0 --.c!"1--..~ ---. (409j4•M1• -CllwOooottir~.JIDllDI (8111!-• ~-=--::~ =~~r:­=...~~1:"" (800).,,_ ··· ·. rt t A-;.. · Cl an Ba ' -B~uep n • ..,._.a'.:. ~; . .. "Y Best Management Practices tor .constructic;>n ActMtles .. G•11•r.I Conattuctlon and Si" Supervtaion Fr .. h (f ~ncrete and Mortar Appllcatton Painting and -Aji>pllcation of Sotventa and AdhQl.V .. Dtinn9 C-""doo . a Mhl only WTIOunl oiiresb ::::":iC::"1"""'1:,_I be v u..-01 ,_,,pf-.: drop l:IOClll \lltderlfllai, mn.r.·.nti ollWI eqljlpmol\I .l ~~~~9111!1 -..... 11Ct8tt..-WS Jll'Ol*"f ·~U.t'a. re~~ ::i ~,,.,..--... ~ .m ..... O COtol'IM\drt11111-. dt."'Jll..,,."t.l.11rntu1lillar wuhdilll \.I: CIMn ... p _,, .. •old le• .. ~~~·city ,,;i 11 .. er.-lftlriy«·tuto>f t"Onl-c:uu.IO 10 1eecl>ot ~ llam\ ikJlin o -bts)lorlt-.-14 ~In •nols.~or .-crMl<a. C;lleftU, u ......,.~,.,...,lett.prlortoon4 cain.'9""'' '·.J ·e-plP'lfl-- ·lrMildloli!lru.msi~cl<J :~ .J~ollll-!'f'lll9l\I' -~~ ~-. o.l ...,..., __ ll:>c:iMI> ~-n\ot.U..riurf- J lleWlr '8IMI 1'!ul'* I.• ·•q••Jlll*)I fnltlA·llNm, ~. lllonn llraln or'"""-· a ·,.....,poor to1-\$: -tt '¥111tor-r I~ in tt. SC'!lel.Q-, 0Sfilitridra1n0r "'""" o *-°"'Yorle1Ve._11t .... -..... ~'"'~~ci/' ,,..,_ Road Work and Paving Operation. 'Earth-MOVing Actlvltid. Heavy Equlp;nent Operation ,.,.,..--..i .. 0 -~..,., ~i61Mllolt!O<dr1 _.... 0 i:..i111nd,ll1fQnTletn[>l-on..-111iiJ8~ CJ \nt«m~iibc.ut Mr ~ltflcrtail0\11 sfollth!4\tr ~ 0 O..~J\\-·~,_ areelra 11111 t!Olm Q:m • .- !bl-~ Wl1ICJb """8linil on6 lllc)a.. _ _,,_,~~ 0 ..._,.,mainloln...O =:r~~.:-: :~· Cl l'n;i.IM ~"I . c:Olllllnmei1t co. ...t..1!11, palnia. •ehide lll.ldl; * •J e....ror•cft"JI- -.... nl)CMWl!i$c•~ ... co.l,,slt>ny --t)\1 Ulll, ~ .. Cl ....... l<aquip._oll,,1- :.I Pro'lldUI\ 'l!f•olle IOalovn 11>1,,...oq"""*c~ •lldill.i~ ;:r "'° .......... fouioqupnien1 Clleak . r~lbr­ ~·PTov.llle.~. -~*"' .......... ~veh!Cia-.• '-1 0-.-old- ~-~ ._...,.,,.,~ 'J Doftlllme;ill•el'Cil•• ~ :i CIM< eqtJ'l)m9tll and ,....,...IHl«ID!llid...,"'9 .... 0 COlJW..,. mainllln ~-...... ~-.:a Coli.cit 1nd ixlm.vi lllt!lOn! :-in-tl!.QQnl811l119. .wilrtUJjlltft ... gJ~·· :) :C~!!1'.~~!Ml<:o :.,~U"'"U"<!!\' • .: """'Wllll-·natet1a1 ~ RiTI eqwplMl!I """• tt191 or ~ ..... dfjln_ ' \J ~""~-· --- ! •• 9 ~==or1~ Pl! 11"":.t:.-u __ ,,_ I i Blueprint of a Clean Bay 15975 Union Avenue -apn 523-42-017 I ~,..-= .. ~J!!V..r=,~ =-.,o.y~illtferi:.,~,,,lilii=~~-=-_..._ ........ ...,._ ... ~-~ ._ ~r'ftlfllll1il.W•-..,,,.nN-o1e11ar-.i .. 11w1e• --...-tbtlll9.IO•IM< .......... l!l ·llf.lllP'Mll~ 7. ::=::r-..::e:::i=~=~=­. ~ ... ~.:t..=L.~t:..~=.r.=.·t••!ll<I,_ 17.t)lin~-----------l'llona: 1a.-·~(h••): _______ ~ 1t.O....V~c•->•-------' B!Jilding Driveway!P!!ldno l.andscap!na Off-site llO-L c.t22'48i: ·CY~ 1fl54i: CrJt 515:t'c.y. ogt 250fcc.y. cut1346t C.y_ 0Qt 135:t c.y. 11. Nt~cv...-.=ar Iii ~-c .y. 1111 14'tc.y. fill ·1a±c.y. 1ill 501±.c.y. zi.:,r.;;::..=~--... --. .... -- u.:.=i.:=:.~:=t.":t•i:-"""°""' Pto*WttqUl!Wtl!IOrkt .. _I at•pllo.a 21.AT-.~"""*•-ndlarlol!'--111•..­.-..r-..A: __ ,_... __ i.IDf.,,,.'Mlll...el!ln =:=:-=~~J::::'~~~ ... ~ .,_,, Ill' ~ M.=::.4:'~·,.=1.:41111":=·:.:1".:.. r::;: .... __ _ ..... t ~*'"*'--'"' ........ waimr-~ .... --' 131 '---- 1--------lr~ ~~M :B ~~. Los: G.Ar :os. 2015 '• ., ! I I I I I ' J ' I \. ' '•, '" '15975 Union Avenue -apn 523-42-011 ' \ ' I ,_, \ r s /\ H >·/\ 4 or 11 CLf\R '.A co.u :NTY .io1u~o. :C ~· L I r O .. R N I /\ ·14075 . :·s ·A" r A:. c LA lf'.11, c .. o u:H r .,., JOB No. :C: A L I F Q·R H :I . A 6 DP !l 14075 I .1 i f /.;t_ '<)· . ElllSltlUAl!JI_,. _ • . 15"' IMY 2llOi5 SO PIPE ·, IO .IS":SD"Jl) Po!SS ~Bii.-»! 15' l11V ':lll1;~:gi;'Ap( ; HtW I&" SO lll ·P~ OIQ EX .SQEJt .lff I ~! Dl51lllC ~ '.--"'-• ..;\' --------:-:---=--==-=--~"s)-=.__~~ SNlITAll'l'~--tt--t~ . ~ ~~§ I' 1. .Ail :~ WES "081 nt sillir MIT r.f! •Y All> rllQET 91E ecumHIY :IQ BE ~ UllDS ~~=-rEU'l5~10S) CONSTRUCTION NQJES; Cl> DIS1llC ll1lllY PW; 10 8E l!El.et.'111) 'II\' anW ~ ~--T fll'!ID!i:H !'ill ir$. ~ iUlll!M a: 'INSUtL 3 'MB IOllS 'IU SIDS.. © ClllNtUO WEI !EIMll::lloWUD TO dsM WA1QlllMl ll!llsm5 ~ ='~Nrt~~ MAIHl£ CMll Gil ClllS1llJCr llE.1J SMlfTAllY. ~. llAIOftli PEii :$1)$. ~ QllSlllJCf'IO SMl1M'( !U!Jt· tmllM: P!I sms. ~. ~i;r;c:A(.lTWIS~ 'r: llMIJCM'· - (I) ~-~;WLL; &·S'lllUCJ\lllAl.Pl.AHSFm. Dtll,EllSNlNSMll IEJM.li @ o:INMa:f IQ 15" sroRll DRAIN l'IPt 'fO Dl$M !i11"lt DllMK MAlllll.£; EX IKV 278.12. @· "°"1~~REsTCli!Aillitil'Ell'IOilt!FwlaA1USS1Ds. @ 0 @' CIJNS1RiJCI'· aiRa itEi' * Sms, C!JISlRiJtr· 5" 'H!CIH'i:r: Wl1tcAL llJRIHll 'llP CF 'lllll. Pll0'.1~ ROci( ~ I" liN JM Rim 92E 11111 1 cailsE!. !ilt'l!EJl>lffcIT 'DllAl•Miltw:~~ @ J:illi11!11.CT. Ml£T Sl!IJCMt (~ Tl!'[ ~Ml IOIC VI Qt G!Alli'l dJ ~ OIAISTY l'IF£ W11 8QX \114 (JJHt'1KJI BOii) • o!f;t . -·--1·-' ~GAS~~ 15" 11Y .. 2111.5BiM'IPC -. IQ 15" ~l1>'¥~wmt EX·cAS ~~ ~ <' ' " ; ·rr, 0 Gl IN ' ~ ' d <~ ("~: DISllC llQtf ar IAY c •) " : • t: l • . ,_ ___ _,_ UNION A~YE ~. .------~ ,f .: ~ I '• ·i.J.:· '# " I ~ ,/ -~··· I -~--.. ·Vr)· ----·1' -(I'll ~•,.~----~t'-- Ii A 21 I I ., . ...-.. / •I .. !J ··, ~-.,, · .• j . ... i .J :S . -= :· ·1 f ..• . F ~ It ;•. ·/ -il ·: .. I ,, ;1 d 6 or" ' II• I I •I I . :·~ .j '"~· t ,-.-.;::· ' ,.:~ ·~ '"" ' \I !';)'.1 I ..._ .J Bt;,oS.SQM HILL ROAQ :SECTION !l'.ME; t-111' . . .... UNIO~. AVENUE SECTION .~.1-.111' CO~MON: PRIVATE !)Rl\IEWAY 3tll..E::1"=<5' .·~'..:.: ~. _ .. !11 .~~~~-ro~:_· -_-_~1 ·--4 oH 1lP ctEWNiWL -·-r-·---'...!:....----.. ---. _-< 1 r-_-------· -------__ ___,__. _:. ~-=-.. -~,-. .; / iw -_ "~--: -~--~L .~ ----.--... _ .: .. ··-"'~------. ___ 1 ... ·-____ __,· ..... ----~------------~:...,314_-i· -~-----,r.:--~-.-.. . ......... -.,~:--·.-·:--· --·""·· . r 1W .. ~· Jilt ~-·j .. -.. -.·~--. ~.!.-r-'_~~-:_:·:,t __ :..:;.:~:.-_·:._-_:.;.:. ___ ._-.: -<~·~ ~·~-·-=-·~ 1 :7~ .... --. -::--_.-~-l.~.---~-~~~-"'_t:C~ :r. J _:-7~_· _-A_:~:_-·-_··-~-~--. 1.1~ _J 1 AT-llllCll!llfT-UE • --:r-· ---T ---., ------t ~ ------·.. --~-.:-: ; ·: ~·-=-·::-_-T --~=-------=--:-.--·-:""."':-~ ~-._-= -:--.:~ I -•t -- I ,7 ·- ~ti ·~·..-.-._·:~:._,_ __ ~_~-------·~.:: ____ .. _ .... : ___ --.. ---L ~ ~ --·-. -----. -·-r ·· ,.,--·: _ .. _____ .. L i"' .. 'iJt .~a..··. -----:. ~-'---·-.:~::-} ... -~ ~·- 9 :. DI' H ~ ·1;_ ::c _.,. "!. •• ! , .. _ ... !""' ...... - _ l'CM iq 'IJESi:llP1ldlj IF I«/\ cSla!MWNrol . llltA'JMEHT' ~- 'ftiTM. L.ll«JSCN't lliF).iWENT Mr>. iREAllElf-Alb "JREAtliOO' ,.,. Nf£A saF-1JQJllll: H~ ·.llIMIE> -MfA CiFl (Sf) (Sf) .(&) ;::.~,... ....... !!!ll,.~.:..,· .. · ... ·~.~.· ........................................ .,.iliilllliill"' ......... ·.<.· .................. 11111!!1 ................. ~~ ,.. (l1) OMA 1 8llJSSlll le.J. 13.~ 761 12.77& jlel M~ : ·- ~-J • ~-i GRAPIDC SC.ALE I i (.lJtn:ft.) lmJt•• tL T e • •••••·**"'" •••••f._• ·' 1·r--..>"·; "t~· ,, ... f -... .·::, ....... ...,: SJREET B!OREJENIION SWALE PETAIL 'MIHCIUt~ -NOT 10 ~- ,, M61fJE!fWJ NilMlQ 'WS"P f!Blf!fk!C 1. ~lf,Jl~DM.lf!JllZl1mS 2. IEIC'of:llTDMJIJEllRIS l ADIOll :saM>IJ ~ lllilJlOI '1111 11£11.5 5. 1REAf DlijFASm llES-AHD S11!L111S L a · w RDS . . 7. R£PAIR EllOSICH AT INRDI' PllN1S l 11£PAR l~flFt.Oli~ 1 . UHam UNIDIMll· 1Q.. ll!l:LJA'IE: -I'll !PU1JQll AT PllO.fl:T OOlll'll1lON llOlfllt.Y ASNIEllllJ AS llEID ASllBID AS ICEEio "AS liwl!» IS JfliC AS llEIEI ."5 ll!OOl 11 ~lllC\t ~ ~ lQJ M1l illSEASElJ lotGET4'llOll AS ltilEI u. .IOO "llJLCH ~ ~mt S'iAlirs ·Aili as 14. ~ 31IJIJUl BE REPW:E0 El!llY 2' 10: 3 'l£NIS Oii M:Jol .BAllf SPl!IS M'PENI IUlU:lt PlllCR :10 :H VIET~ ~UM. A*UN. E'4RY 2-3' Yl:NI$. Oii AS NEBJED .ur l ·.---·· T,,_...,.,... ... ==-.,_._,.;,.o=v""'-'--..'.,. lo------"' ----.i STORM DRAIN LABEL DEJAIL llOSCME ·. ·-. · .. .OllA 2. IDT 1 12.J78 e,na -~~ L0!2 10,l!llO ~357 OllA 4 lDT3 11 ~139 !1,!155 . 0.99 •• ~g , 3!1.ll:n T*" F!!l!!r111ln; ~.e5o 2211 ~23 . 7,21 $.1174 223 II, :rot!ll ~r..o of s.t.t ' Dllturl>oc!'(-)< 3,009 D 0 .o 0 ·O 0 2.211 242 -m 0.~11 oc 8,231 ~ 0.112 0 ,18,'190 21;810 0 ·o 21,810 190 'P~~~lo!~ ru.-Al....,..,.,._oddod to•M-oftllooltolltatm •PIWl!UlllJ ..ilog• inl)riius aaifoct. "' ·=.::... '--Al lllpliWl8 -.....i ... , .... "'tlll""' !ho! -• ,.,......, _ .. IUEQ!JlQll !WlH NW!i i .fO~ USE lll1lf SltiAMWATO FlllUllES flllll 3DE SUJPl5. ·DESIGN llCJlES CONSTRUCOOM i'IOTES L 7. FW. IOlll ClatlU PllME> IN ' lilOAErElllOI m::MDI.. Sl!fl:llC1IDIJIS,IJOCllDT. --~--l'lalMM·-WiQ!r,111-~ CURB;~ SIBlltJC IEM.5 lfo\Y IE IQlflll ~ f'l'IEJ:r ff ~ iJlll!EEI. I' ~· W1Z 2 P1*ME 1$ llJf MlllMLE. NISllMl' aAlS 3 ~ 11111 lll <Mii.lie 3" J&P Lm ~ 'JI•· (WO. ~ CJffll.,QWD ~ 8UDlllOI sciL 8' t"'1 l'9:RlOUI IO Mllm!llll* m:HIQ. ~ llRll lO.ll'RlllOI c ~--~ tJ ~ - ~ IOl\ill Mil .... Pill ~ 'IU:l..:.t SPB:IJli1QIS. IM.QI {OPIDMIJ PO llJllJfl(l'QI 'lll>tlCN. ~ A -·2.-t: LCIE! CF ~ llOQ! IU.al MJW> IE l'llOall .Oii 41. Dl'laD ll'fJ4 CF llllnltlllllllT U. 2. ~,SV8CIWI( 111\1111!."51Mllll0 -~.-1!.111111161l MJn' 1l11M111111· 11) MJ.CI Rll =~~?a: l'IAlli ~u:::r~a:. :llWL J[ IPll llll' II' __ umt -Sllll'tlMl'IEfW. r;OiNCf llQI II' "lit QMl!ll 11111 l.-:lfE~OlllllJQ!ll.Y == ~ Ll:r lllll' CM1Hlllr :.:.:-Clt"L~'== !CSP IJ)t(t llf!Qtlllllr CM'SllE lllJIDOOlOll MFA L1111$. ~~CB.S Pl'll\1DE SP0J" Sfli.11°" ON FUHS (FE. 0£, CIE; £). SI:!: DCTN.. 100, J. 0..111 NjQ WL ~.MAf..llE.NO~ Bl cM. Ill! ~Hlilcll EJ.'Gtms. . .. iat:RJ: ru:r 1\Jl!I! 'Ill@ § JjlGH, E)JQ6) CXl!lllf Mil FICaJTY. l!UT '1IC1l!J ll!C£S!M · IJSE S. OiR!lfEll:HT·IW .11£~1<1 ~ "9El<E lllWDIT JO A !llflllOI !lI DEJA\S 110 .!. lll. .Storm Drain ~Basin Plan 15975 Union Avenue-apn 523-42-017 10 or 17 ----------------~---:;::~----....... ..... ,. . .,,.. 'fiber ·Rolls ' " ' ..... , Stabilized· Construction :Entr.t1nce/EX.i t TC·l SEcTION 9,_9 NfS loore 5l ~~-=c::...~ !1 ....... ,,.,..,,.OPa -..__/, -'- ~--'-"'""""""'"--"""'-~ - C!IBCUI) Br. -----1 ...... Br: se-10 !!!!!.Jli_ --('MIC / ""1EI Sto.r m Dr-ain lntet Protection !llfR~! lf•'IDll•.,... .................. ~ ..................... ........................ i=-==-~~~.119..: SE-·10 LEGEND m CONSTRUt:Tl()l OORAN<l:/Em PER DETAIL ·it-1 ----FIBER RW. BARRIER PER DETAIL 5£-S Storm Drain Inlet P.rotection Sto r m :Or.ci:in Inlet Protection ST!llM DRAIN "INLET PROlECTION PER DETAIL Sf:-'10 SE·'.LO l ·ci ·S· i:i ATOS :2 0 f .5 Ill f'RQlECDQN -IYl'E t NOT 1'0 SCALE. Erosion Control Plan 15975 Union Avenue -~pn $23-42-Cn 7 SAN TA GRAPHIC SCALE r T i ,,.,,..,, 1-. ...... CL II RA c a:u N T·l'· C Ir LI. F 0-ll'"N I A. ~ • I 1 1 Ol' 11 JCB '·NO. 14075 \ \ I I I \ I \ I \ I I I \ I \ I \ I • I\ I I I I \ I I \ I I \ I I I I 1"1'-11'12" "".J".!' I I i1111111111 ~·i!!\lll.U.-,'ll .::'M /1 tnmlllii1iV11lllUJT1Tnilfd / ' ,,._,,,d )-r--~-·- i D :D !~ -11--.. ---- trl-:-+-~'-+-+-~~l;_J=: : I ~I ii ~f-1 --+--l--1--i >--·;--~ ·-L....-~ -~~ I , . . -l1 ' -----"' d' , -·t ---~ E:-_-,_-;,. -~~--------------.,._-~__] A NEW CUSTOM HOME: UNION EST ATES -LOT 1 15975 UNION AVENUE LOS GATOS, CA , ... ~. , l 1 I Ill! 1 -l~Q~ & .-\ ':--~ (l l ------ ' v:r 14'-6" 1'-1 tn' 1 ' 11''-C' 21' ,, .. A NEW CUSTOM HOME: UNION ESTATES -LOT 1 15975 UNION AVENUE LOS GATOS, CA I .SlU/rill't'9Wt'rAVE."Lt • ~GAlUf.CA. .. 9'UJU • (O)~ LEFfFRONT ROOf PLA~ ~ .,.... " ! .. ~.,. LOT J -----~~~~~~---------------------------------- ~I.INS& ""~"~~ ----- FRONT (EAST) ELEVATION ~ALJ!: 1/4 " = 1'-0" ---~~~"":!l1:u.-rtt:~------------------~-- ~&..ne& --ei~',='"9' --- ,._~Tl! eHIN<&l.5 "T' cS->-BU! !!NCI __ .,..__eo4..H-.-- T-l"l.Jl>TI! Ej~;;~9i--~&-----"'AINT!t' ll'IOOC' !.. ~~TllUM IJ:::t.j;;;:;;;:::::H-~f-t----~l.AO LEFT(NORTH)ELEVATION ~: V 4 " " 1'-0' 915.CO' EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS LOTl REVJSJOMB DATE: 11/1"!11!S SCALE; ~ eHCl'IN SH E ET Al.4 111 OF - ------------------ ---------------------~=~~~~ ~U'il!!e REAR (WEST) ELEVATION --- --____ ------ --- ----.::::::::.__--1-~eo'JlleOV'l!l!XeTtoldo ~ --,.~ eAA6e AA~ -----51!1! eec.TION "°"~Tl oo 6~L.INl!e RtldNb --8()~- TOI" l"IA'Tl! RIGHT (SOUTH) ELEVATION ~:i/-t" • 1'-0" EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS LOTl llE\llSIONS DATE; 11/1'11115 SCALE:N!>~ SHE!!T Al.5 1'1 OF· Hl&Ai!if Nlb5 ~ --·------.........------------- ------ ------------ i...le!50'~ ~~ BEDROOM2 KITCHEN VERANDA ....... SECTION A-A 5CAL.e: 1/-4" = 1·-0· ---~~~~~------------------------------ -• -. -. -. -• - . -. -. -·r::~ .... --=-. -----• -. ---. -• -• -. ----f~!l;;;r;;m·:z~T-lill>R~- --· = ~ D D m m "i D D li -·-· -----·--·-·-- SECTIONB-B -. . '. ~114· " 1'-0" SECTIONS LOTl DATE: 11/1~1 9 SCALI;: />6 eHOl'IM SH E ET Al .6 ~OF - --~IM;....---""t 1 I I _I_ -I --: I I I i I j ! I I ' l f'-0" I ' I 0·1 , I -~·--~ ... :-r Ir ; t -·-FAMILYROOM----~ r ~ -l ~·~-ll ! I- INFORMAL DINING ~ -+- -I I ~:_ _______ m:::J :::::::::::::mar=:::,::: .... ___ ..... : :- ~ ---t---11+--~+-"-ia.~-,.._---~ DEN/ 1 , 11+--+--ia-------- FORMAL 1 FOYER o+--+--... ·------+-~~~. : ~TO :==:===:======= I I ft- I • - -__J ,.,,__.._. l!Tll KITCHEN ci..10'-1" L -----, I I I I I I I I I I ...,._ ____ ..J '-"'-"" 1 I c.1..1!AN OUT---+--+----1-~ 91 : [' ~ ~'ttt--+--~-=~--~ , ~ i I f ~+lil!lill-=1 ===_~=~1!'11'11Ji1:ili~)l~t,,l~~~-Y_:l-~l"l.J1~11+ -_ --+--+--- _ __.__,, ... ,.. -_ --t==: 1 : 5 , r I 1 ' I ' I To '', I ' i, '-· a'-4 "°' ~ I! ~ : BEDROOMS c:J.6 i~·-1· l ~-~ -b--· -~~!-r=l: i! ,'~1' ,,,__;~ .• ---~ \ ,_§ : ~ *-"'-~J--'~I ------------------~ rM,~m~1 ~~:~'~,~-~:~r~1 ~~ 2L--•tit-~1~~~Wliiliililillilii&iillilililillillillliilililililil;z;r;ililill&Ql~:---_,j,__,liJ,~ " I -""' I + I-\ f-- - -7 il ~I ~ -.1'-------"",6:.:::.''......, ._"------+---'_,.,~'1._"_---¥-_ __,l!l"-'._"","'-. -+--.I' \ ,, _ i I 0.1•_\,.,. I \ I , 17"------------..fi<.l..:""'----1--------1---___.,y., \ I I I I \ / J I 8l I I I 8l \ I \ I I I x JI I \ I \ I \ I I I \ I \ I I I ~ ,_ ________ _j J..CAR GARAGE ~11'·1' 2'=16' + j j I I I I 8l I I I !It I I I #~====---.. --------71 I'.. 1 ~ 8l I ~Al.E: 1/4" • 1'-0" Nafi:.'1'H ::11'-0" SKEET LOT2 A-2.1 OF Ju -'"\..J u -'--'-- ::J--....i - - - - - -...ru .............................. ...... .Iw u u .fw --- ~ '-" ------ X r~ 11--r..,..+-''-'--+-'-'-1 -t-·:--±,,._M l:t-~TJI 2 17" 'rr+"'--fl' T-~D::m.....,.:llllicl::zm.lal ... ,!W'--'--'-'lzL __ _ I I I I +-------J -------+ BEDR.00M2 el.~ V'f'L'L.Tei:> I I I I I I !11'-10" OPEN TO • BELOW ;... _, ::' 9!1'-6" HALL GJA 'f-4" 1C'.-""" I I I I I +-------: -------+ I MASTER SUITE c:.i.svM-r=:i I I I I l ~~~~~~~~~~ ...... ~~ I I ~ I : "''"°"~'"'" I 1 I '1 I ~;Jmv1w~111111lpl!lU~l'!j ~ L/ ... m1m.rmm1~:m ~ ~ MASTER ' . __: CLOSET , C::L..1$ '1-4" -~ : . QI fllil:!ln'l'illl''' .lliUW'.l'l"l'llJ,C , . h.1T111 n. :111T11f;1111J,1mmm11JI\ ITI.1 - r ----DE9ROmW--------c:.u; VAUL. r=:> 1 ru .I. I• .. fl·•111 .A ' ·, "':. f :--v~ .~ ~ BEDR.OOM4 GI.& 11'-4" :Y+O x SECOND FLOOR PLAN I ec~: 1/4' 1·-a• LOT2 REVJS[ONS DATE: 11/1"!11!1 SCALE: "'6 SHO'ffl SHEET A-2.2 OF FRONT ABOVE REAR ~ 1/4" s 1'-0" LOT2 REVISIONS DATE: 1111'!/UI SCALE; l'6 eH~ SHEET A-2.3 OF ~ ~ ~ Cl'.J ~ _,, ~ ~~ ~~ .. ~ _o qz ~ § ~ I I ~ ~ ~ ~ I~ 1~ ~ ~ ~~ -.d ~~ fill! ~~ Q3 ~-·1 = ~ I l'. ·~'l !! ~ °'j~ ~ -~ ij ~ Ii • ~~ 11 f~ :~ l.'l 5 Ii ,:c QI II! . ' :i: -I ~ i ~ ~ I I I I I I I I I I !\ I •~r: I ~11~ I 1i]R~ r"t! I iU I ~ I I ~ ~W'\I ~~ ~= ~a I il I ~ l'. ! I ~ I ~ I ~ I IJ i\: I I I : ~ I ::! I Iii ~~~I l§ lJ I : , I~ :~ ;i ~~ ~~ z ~ IJ i~ I ! .. § I I I I I J I ~ I I I I I I :s: i ~ ; ~ 0 ~ 1'-6" k L 11'-2" L 'l'-4' ~ 5'-"I" ~ ,, >\ .., .. .. 2"1'-"I" N "'t-... ~ g """" ~ ~ '9 ~rn.C-:lr«:l.ci!-INllver.:'g~~ A NEW CUSIDM HOME: ' ~ ~ ~ I f>'-1" ~ 1·-e·ID· g G ~ ~ IP z (j a ~ QI - - F ~ ~ j .. 11 11 1 H ~ -iti~ i~ r ~ra ~ !~:~ § 111 >r ! II; i~: '-. -1. / ~11 -1...iin ~ I ~I ! I 11 F!1I ~1~ \ n ~I ~ § Ill ~ i : I : ~\l ~ii\~~ ~ ~~I;. I z g I: I 0 a, ~::I ~ ; ~:II tr:1 filll! I :, ~ ~:i:1· I ~~ H · 1 ~~ ~o r-r· I~~ qlZ 1 ]:w l 1~ i Ii ... I~ I~ § ~ y'I I 1 ~ I I ~ ! I ~ I I ~ I I i i : z I, I I fjlfii I I I~!~ lg~~ 1 I ~ra ~·! i ii I iii~ I ~~ v I J ' l ~ ]~~ ~,lii 1 .11: I. 2 e =!! " § II 1'-6" L L 11•-2• L "l'-4' L 5'-T L II >\ " k • 21'-"I' - I r,,J • ~.a..a~...-..witt.r-~ a ; t 5 ~=~~~,~.,.~ 'T) N ~ ! ~ ~~:i~~~br~ UNION ESTATES -LOT 2 l(Ol!I JSAAT &A~Sl)l_ lA fl S • g ...... wlh..Ard-1".-.t'i.Allwl~p-'Or"lo ~ f G 1111u.-o11..-. . -· --· 15975 UNION AVENUE LOS GATOS, CA 31 UfllJVHKSl'l-Y AV!!. "l.~• 1.0S<l>O.ruS:. CA.• 95030 • (4111) :J9S..2SS5 ~ ~ ---------------- eHAf'l!!I:) a PAIN~ !.IX~ TAIL.$ --++-~ 9 S' O/G &TVGGO MOLDIHs. !lolU... 'TVP. D~TIVI! ~AA COT'TA G"'6Le Yl:N'l"e -------------------- ·~" nU!! rcco ;--LINI!! -;,. ~ ~--:;:-N;-cs.~. -T - - -~ eec:.TION I"~ ~AA~ ceJ _/ ~LINS _____________ -------_ ___ _ ____ ____ -e~~~T' li&S28.!la' ----- ~T!ve ~ eon'A CS.ASLZ ¥£NT9 PAIH'fa:I ~ e!>.Me t SX& AAl"T!!R& o 82" O/G ~ '11-«IJ!>TIG ON G!!ILJNcS. REAR (SOUTH) ELEVATION ~AU!: 114" = 1'-0" eTVGGa C:.OUIMNe o ~~Of' L.OISoGI"' RIGHT (WEST) ELEVATION ~ 1/4" = 1·-0· 1I0~.6T ·' ~.9' LOT2 REVISIONS DATE: 111'1"1115 SCALE; ,i.e !!MO~ SHEET A-2.5 OF J ... ------ UNl!!SO'~ l!XISTINISo ~ • ..._..,. ~~~CS>...._..,~ i'IHJGH~ I& L.al-e&'r --~ __ ------------------- --:.....__ ----------·--- -----~------- 15• HAL.I" ~UND &AL.V. &U~ _ i=ll&.QC>' Tc:>l"~"T"e__ ----- eo&.6'1' 1..INI!! 90' ,i.sov! l:XleTINS~ e+tAPl!i!C:' a !>T AINl!:D ex !Ill.A~ TAIL.e. "'9' O/G B-B SECTION eGAU!i: 11"4" = 1'-a" OR.~Poel!Cl~E!.~ ------------l"IHIGH~ IS l..Oll'l!ST - - ------------------- SHA~ a l"AINT!!P SX 111.Al"T!!R TAIJ..S o S'O/G ~T ll'llN~ ___ _ _ __ -,...-...,.,_~~~.....g~.v"'~ VIN'l"I.. GI.AP /'"e" Til..15 litOOI" 6'>' eo&.61' --.-1-l-STIJGGO FINISH CS>~ ONI..'!" FIFtel"LAGI! l..IN!!OF~~~ A-A SECTION 2'1"!.IJCI' LOT2 llEVISIONS DATF.: 11/1"1'1!5 SCALE: ,,.. eHCll'IH SliEET A-2.6 OF ~ ~ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 0 ., I KITCHEN L----, I c....!.L ~l_~LlJH:8~=i=i=~~~:f1~~~~~~~~~·m:Jm~~~~I~-+~ la~~~~~~ j " j j I I I ~ I I I ~ I I I I I ~ --------. I /I I I I I I I I I I I \ I I \ I \ I \ I I I ~ I \ I \ I \ I \ I \ I \ I I 3-CAR GARAGE I \ I / \ I I \I ' ' ' ' ' ' > __ .J - - -71 / / / / ' ' / I 2qq5• +· llEV1810NS / / / /ttl_~_jj_~~-,6.-~ .. ~~-+~,.-.. --1!--~&~·~·~::TL/~//~~-.':~E~§=~,.~~ .. ~ms!lmll!i!i!i!i~-+O~PL~~1'~()~'f~3____,~~ i!i L..I!' 114" ~ 1'-<'' ORTH HD BEDROOM2 51'-.6"' !S'-6" MASTER SUITE D D 4'-0" 1'-0" ,-T---, M<t------~. -t -W-.L - - LAUNDRY [3 BEDRQQMJ .BEDROOM4 LOT3 llEVJSIONS DA'l'J;, 1111'1115 SCALE: /16 !ll+Ol"IN SHEET A3.2 " OF - i ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ rn E> ~~ ~~e o~ ~ w . > ~ ~ ~ !il w~ili::: w ~ ~ ~ '""" ~~ ........ ~ ... ~ -~.id~P"iaf'lo~ ~~....::..a1o1.:1tiwr.ioa:itd'..-°"' Gr~~Glf...t~U-. ~~u.~~~~1-r. tou-i.~.-=t'l..11.t.Nll:Hlpr'orlo -- .;a 0 ~ ~~ ::. "Tj ~~ vt.'.iQ)cifj::c:;~· ·-.:-r,-i/ ,;. ~ .• ~~·--·~/~ ' I • "! I A NEW CUSTOM HOME: UNION ESTATES -LOT 3 15975 UNION AVENUE LOS GATOS, CA \ \ 1 \ \ '· \ I I t :2'l6 .::Z'l& * KC1HLSAAT~! - . . -----I I.~ . \ ., ~ u \.. I i\ T [ s I ----- 51 UNIVHRSl'l'YA,VH. •L•• UlS CJAl'(IS, CA ... ~• l4CC>J95--mli ~ .. I § -. I ~ ~ -.. ~ en ~ ~1 ' i IP I 1 ~ ~ I ~~ H i jg n; ij ~ I)! i " ~ > Hfi ~o ~~ §'~ 'h ~ m \ 1 11 ~ ! ! ~ ~ ii Ii ii H : ;:i.: \ I~ I I i ~ ~ • i ! ~ ...... 11 "O ii ~ I • i i 6 z I i~i& . . ~ ~~':~i~ ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ ii .... > ~ ~ ~ 11%1~ ~1~ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1\ I i1~ I i~! I ii : ii I 1i1 I e I I I I ! I I ! I // ! I I i i i I ! I I i I J I ! j J I ! I I i I I I i I J I ! I I i I I I ! I l r !1 l1 j, j i !e jb .IJ? 111 i ~ I I ~ ~~ ~~ 1--4 II 0 ~z I I ~ iU!. I ~ ~ P.1 -~C~.,.,..~•o-'°"' A NEW CUSTOM HOME: GI ,.......... r,-, ' •-.-..-~iw•W•~ 0 w : & ~ ~"":..:!.~"" ...... -"-. .,, '" i ...... 0.-"\j ~f'Af--rtr'I "-"' • ~o..V. .,..IN~ ' "--t ~ tolllill ~~ ..... pt"«\o ...... .. ~-.i-15975 UNION AVENUE LOS GATOS, CA UNION ESTATES -LOT 3 ·-.:a· i I~ ~ 1~ g ~ l ij II ii I I~ 2f ij ~.. .. i "'I I > ~ i~ 'I .. _,. ~ §i e .. ..~~ !~:e ~I :~1 ~ ~ . I II ! i . I . . I i I ! H ,r ·1 ~~ ~ a ~ f i; i i i i i i l 1 I I ! I I ! I I i I Hil I A~~! I iit l I ~~ ! I dJ I !i i ~i ! I ~~I I I '1 . I ' ! \ I ·1 I ~ I ii 11 !I I i I ! I I i I JI i I J I ! I I i I j I i i i j i ,.le Ii~ ·-· KC)l-f L S J\1\T' & ,.\S<.;p( r .·\ r r s J I UHIVHKSnY AVH. •L ... UJS GAl U. ~ • 9smD • («II) 395-2.W I ----- ------~ ----- 1..INlli IQ' t>eOVI! elCieTl'I& ~ !111! ek.TlalC -·~Tl! (II)~ ~L.IHM -------- Hl5H8T -· GOMl"oemON ~I.I! -~~~- ...._ _____ ,,_~:!<?'-· -· -· TCll" 1"!.ATI! ~\ ,!O' _. TQI" !"LATE! 501.00' lill ---------·------- ·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-· Q9 Hl6~el'r !IJC'$1! l"AJNT'!l:>"06D'' 5L/TTl!!IO. 521.!IO' ~~=~~ii~---~F061'T1ClN 6Hll'l6L.I! PAIN~ "QG.12!" :::i.....2----511Tl1'1. ~1.00' REAR (SOUTH) ELEVATION 5GAU!: 114" ~ 1'-Q' ------------ .------------ -· - -~ UICI! !!O' ~e<i~rc& ~ - - - -------51!GT!OIC -~Tl! 00 ~I..~ ___ e~:z&......,..O~&~·....,. _ ___,..,._.>r·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-Mi.Hl!Sr -I! -·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·--~~,~· e MldoMl!ST RICl61! _, B.21.50' J ... ------ _;,--- -.. _:· ......... :,·: .::-::-·:.··. ;_. . . . . . ; . . ~ . .... --- RIGHT (WEST) ELEVATION ~ALZ: 114" ~ 1·-a· LOT3 llEVISIONS DATE: 11/1"11!5 SCALE: HJ. SH~ SllEET A3.5 6 OF - ------------------------------- . :I COVERED ~ PATIO ------- IL .. nRSUITE I HALL NICHE ----------- ·' !leO.O&' ·' 3-CAR GARAGE -...... ·-·-·-·_,.,,__·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-· ...... --- - -._... _____ -· ....,,,,...._ - SECTION A-A SCAl.E: 1/-4" " 1·-0· E:, T -·-·-·-·-·-·-· ·---(il~~~-!50~' ~-TO!"l"\.A"TI! ~ t- i-F-~i:ii~~~e!!l-=Jl••~:z~~l'Jpj~~~il'.!ICr·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·!!i-~~'liiiit.2,.,.1 ... "f,.......,..,..,[bdjl( ..... .-- 1=-11 --- L.INI! OP' l!XleTING G~ SECTIONB-B LOT3 UVISIONS DATE: t 1/1 'V15 SCALE; "'6 Sl+Ol"fol SHEET A3.6 "T OF - ~ L:::J :;1 100 104 l,ASUEN COURT -~ ,;p~'ii; ;il1~~{]~~ NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN ~1 " •90' llEVJlllONll DATE: 1 111~19 SCALE: ,,. eH()ffi S HEET A4.l IUOF - l .1 t I f I EAST SIDE OF.UNION AVE~ . . ·~-, ,. =:xi· I I IS~i;tu.J.," -..,.___,_........._ ............... , .. """""""'" ~ --~---:1~:~0'.T, ---- WEST" SIDE OF UN}ONAVB.! --~_, .. --.. -~ NORTlLSIDlE OF BLOSSOM HILL RD ··i·'"""-.....,.......~~..._,, '-~....,...~I >lo !i flit -- 1 _: 1 :::=s ~-;;::.;;;,;-)-,.. ( ___ , rffaioDi i1tttt L ~~~~~::_~Jc-=~--l~t· =~ .. ~·~-hl ~--~~=~· ==~~==J-... i'.---': ~1-:.,.:wl --v k ' Ir 1¥ T ~ ,, -!tlot n-U~I __..,. _____ .......__~--19094~ lfll,J. ~------------..........,,~~..-.,..;--'-'--a.I .!>ATI< 11/1~, I ~~~ M11----,.,..._.....----,-1N,1Q ~:HIU...IU)' . ~.. slfllET. 1 "4i"i"TOll!IL.oeeoMMflJ.flU:'.-....: ......... --------SOUTHSIDE OF BLOSSOM HILL RD. STREETSCAPES .• A4.:? -~,:~ ··~· ~;~~~'{~jtl~}:;p~;~,;;:,~~~YM~~~:}'.Fi I :~:;~f jf ·,,. ''. ~t"· •. :,' t .. ~ : .• i •.• ,. :·-'. · .. -.·· ::; SHADOW STUDY 12-21 3PM SHADOW STUDY 12-21-12PM SHADOW STUDY 12-21 9AM :~1;0t~:~;~~C:i'S~;~::~, ~,:~I: tf \~l"'.'A.,•,. . .J .... u:;::::::::::~:::::;:::t:· '~====::::::E:;;:;;;;~2:..=..-I D/\.TI;, 1111~15 l~H-1 SHEET A4.3 116 OF - SHADOW STlJDY 6-21 12PiY1 SHADOW STUDY 6-21 3PM SHADOW STUDY 6-21 9AlVI ~! (p nl (p m ~ () + z (p r~ 0 i--3 w ....... ll) I;)> 1r > U' c ~ I~ :'-I 3 > ~ ~ ~ !i] ~ ~ ~::: . ~~I~ ...,,. IJ: I~ I~ ~n.~~~ ..... '~"~ ~...a~~'--'llnMsl !Z.'":.=-..-.o t:\'n.· '~ 91'"\l~(tltf ..... rr...W.. :=-...:;.=r~~~ INLll..t:- + ~ 0 ~ N ~ ...... () ... i ~ ~ I /I I ;!; I ~ I . !~i IJ:Jr.d .I~~ A NEW SUBDIVISION: UNION ESTATES 15975 UNION AVENUE LOS GATOS , CA + r-4 0 ~ ....... ~ ...... 3 i ~ ~ -- II I< () 1-1 L S ,l\ /\ 'T j &\s _.:;~lLl:\11-:-, $1Ul'ClVJ:ll:SllYAV&~·· UJlt:iA'ltJS. CA..• "°30• •>~ ~ i I_ ill ::::::> z ill ~ z () -z -::::::> e 0 Landscape Fence Legend lil lk1' tall -- cal lk1' tall -,_"' lq> di rolGl'lllg ••II [!I 6'-o'tdl-plo""*ll- BLOSSOM HILL ROAD ~ .... i..<ndlloap"9 h ...... !P"dt llJ-- 6'P'BICI! ~hre<ryordl ~ loyMw<I-. x ,,,. ~tt...oloti.~ ~tt:;J~ J..ONl,lo "" x x @ Plant Legend --"*--..... --.... ---..-=:.-:.o1o:= 1rw1>ong ..- TMJ.9HUl5d0ol\/lle ttl 9 -.......-,.. ' -....- "' I .....,......._,,,,""' F'9 ' f91.Joa ... ""'"""' "' 5 1111uo-· """"""' GI. 5 .::.-.-... 11~ ~-on...il 1:>11 ~ --P""""'-on.al .... "" ... x )( ~ Planting Plan ICl!T' 9IZI: --NI:: I ~ I w , *' 9 LB I "' 5 -c:o\1!!115 l.l'4 I l.J! I IP I !II. I ~ I T I ClA I BICl-CllNIU. J I c; I ~"' ~h,_,..... 1oy ................ ec>r~----==:...-_..,,_ ~._ >YU-......- i..tcm-fU'Plo i..n... __ ..... ....,._'-¥'"_ --e.MclMolll'f T-~ ~-­...... ,..... ~- x ,., ~ x ® 1 .. =10'-0" O' 10' 20' ~--·---~IJ~ ~- ""'"Mft"' """'"' ......... _ ........, -lrto -...9c1ge -,..,. ... __ ~ ~ "" ··~ Revision 3123115 City oammants 4/8115 City comments ~5121/15 "Cjty"comments A\. 9124/15 mo ntlantion -Wtl -,.._ ......... .... "'"' L1 "2 Appendix B: Tree Inventory Table Table 2: ll'ee lnvent.oty 1~llwalk I ( Querous ll¢folhlJ :"""'ii·{~· ·;.1~ 4' 15 ·; e'Ff!;t 1!'<f0r ··ft.oh.· . J l~ 1::r-,;! : .... t [:: " . ·:_ : :~;;,;{4i-i1e~~----.-1. 15 ·91~ ---r~-. •H·~-·--i I _luckJIHrO I • ~. ~ :~~r.l'"'\l•Plna.' , 165t 1t ~ 45 1CI!-• JllClq!f ·~'!111 . . , 12' 12' 12' ~~~I ~ • \ • . ~ 1~~~1:-==~i~~ -~.~ .. ~-~~:L~~~-~J~~-~-~H~-~j . 2a ':.f~:·-.·· .ei nt -~i·CioGJ. -~~-·Mtitllaie; • •' • : • •. I •-. ~ rp~~<~ i1~54f ----,~ ... 15 :. 6 1 ~~'-, 1P.,;· ·-_"""" ~~~~ \~~~·~ -~~r .-·~'.~-·~ _'.'87;,~.--. -r~-~·~ --~ l i =19WJn.m i 1sss: at 18 s I Fair I Paar _..;.... • ,-,·-· .. ,----· -__ ,. ___ ; __ ~_ -:-~·-··---·---;·-.. -,--·---~---_., -·~-. ·-- *;~-· .. ·1'7" "· HI,,· ·1~ · 8.Filir. .-f1ir ·~· *[~: I;'"!-· . t~ ··~-: ~t _ J~_ -... = *:&-~!SO-IT · n ";F~r (~( ~. *i =. 11eeo ! & ! 1s 81 Fair I Foir Moderal9 ; : rnacroplry6wl ' i *::-=.. :-_t118V el .U IFl'oor ;l"~r M<xie,_il<'.' ~-i 'i ,. *i f::m rodwDod j 1&e2 1 30 ! 45 ,:·1.Good. . 1---i i~1 1 ! ., I I *:~~ 1:1-~--~f c ~ .. ~ :;~---]~--:. ::J ::1~~~ '·• ~~{·1. -~ . 8 i~• . : j~'.. . 11 ~~ . - i~~.11~6) -·_:st 45 -1~1~ IQlod M~~: :Mll!biln\.~ ''1881 . 1-1;,· ·es S'jPl><)t' ·:Pi>cit · lill!b ~~ . I iS.,.;.,.illsh i 1666: . ao'j ss 6i"""' I Poor j c~~~ _ _!___: _____ . --· -_______ j ,Mulboli\i'(~ ~.111611 11!l 20.. d!-!'O«. i F'</o' : &'b$) • ~~ I I Eulom block i 1870; - - --14 •. l 25 8 i Poor i Poor i=r.lr-'!PaM I I _ _ I I f~~--:-;sTi'' it:_ ··20· ,;_GOI# ---:;..;.,,, -~··· ·:• ! EB.Stam black I wa11YJ1 tJuglons '. niQrB) • turn' I ' . I I · '·18)'1t tt.14 .. 10.4 . 141 I 25 101~ •. ·;o~Fair ·:. ,;, ' High Hlgh High .. ·. ., :i .l 12' 12' 12' 12' 12' 12' 10' 18' 20' 10' 16' 12' 18' 10' 20' 20' 18' 16' High 12' 11,gi, ··--12' Hi~--1~ ~ .... "" ' . ; fth t~~·;·. ", ..... ;. ~-~~-l1~'.~: .. ----____ 20L --T~ .. :.~, .. .t~~-. 1~\1(111_ lt71~, •; 110; · .1~ ... 1D'PQ<lr Poer·.· . _·fjiglJ . !-;E~-,-1;;.~·.;'"_;:;,~~-~~15(--. ~a1F;;-··'·1~:.::, .. ,_1·~h·"~ 1a 111' ~=~·':;111~< · a.·-·-,~i-: ~-~~ .. ". Paot .. ·;ii.oli-. r~~-11;1~",· a. '1s! e:F* ··-·!~;---~. 1~1~; j:~~-7" ; 1:in ·: a ·-ts · It Rif r>aot , ~ l~= J .;71a' 22 2sl 1~!-~ iPoor . IHI~ -1 ·.rm~ 10 T&1 __ · 10;"""' ... ·.p00, -~ 1 12' 12' 20' 2a I ,_ I ; flgh '1 1 • 10' . I I 101 1. s' Poor I I lQ: 11:~.Jt -· ~ ·. . r·_· ·201·-·+_;-r···-;~----i-H~--·1' I I ' ] . .4a'; 'i5 :}~1t0 ·-,~["' .. ·:li9L 0 ! J Poor I 4 .}oor. l'tlor• I tfigh _:[~ rH~h· '.Htg_h .. 12' 12' 30' 20' 20' 8' 20' 24' ia 10' 111' 111' 10' 24' -.._..._ FENCE/RETAILING WALL DETAIL -~: 1/2" = 1'-Q" Existing Tree List Revision 3123115 City Comments <118115 City Comments .... 11/19115 -.. _ ..... -.,. ..... L2 .. 2