The URL can be used to link to this page

2015-034 - Adopt the 2015-2023 Housing Element and Addendum to the General Plan Final EIRRESOLUTION 2015 -034 RESOLUTION OF THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF LOS GATOS ADOPTING THE 2015 -2023 HOUSING ELEMENT (GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT APPLICATION GP -14 -002) AND ADDENDUM TO THE GENERAL PLAN FINAL EIR; AND REFERRING THE RECOMMENDATIONS FROM THE HOUSING ELEMENT ADVISORY BOARD AND PLANNING COMMISSION TO THE STRATEGIC GOALS DISCUSSION IN JUNE 2015. WHEREAS, the Town Council of the Town of Los Gatos certified and adopted a Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) for the 2020 General Plan by Resolution 2010 -091. WHEREAS, the Town Council of the Town of Los Gatos adopted the 2007 -2014 Housing Element by Resolution 2012 -008. WHEREAS, State law requires jurisdictions to adopt an updated Housing Element for each eight year cycle. WHEREAS, the Town has prepared an Addendum to the 2020 General Plan FEIR for the 2015 -2023 Housing Element in accordance with State law. WHEREAS, the Town Council appointed a Housing Element Advisory Board (HEAB) to assist in the preparation of the 2015 -2023 Housing Element. WHEREAS, the HEAB conducted numerous public meetings regarding the 2015 -2023 Housing Element. WHEREAS, on March 5, 2015, the HEAB recommended adoption of the 2015 -2023 Housing Element, with some additional changes, to the Planning Commission and Town Council. WHEREAS, this matter came before the Planning Commission for public hearing on April 8, 2015, and was regularly noticed in conformance with State and Town law. WHEREAS, on April 8, 2015 the Planning Commission recommended adoption of the 2015 -2023 Housing Element with additional changes and the associated General Plan Amendment Application (GP -14 -002), the Addendum to the General Plan Final EIR, and the four recommendations from the Housing Element Advisory Board, to the Town Council. WHEREAS, this matter came before the Town Council for public hearing on May 5, 2015, and was regularly noticed in conformance with State and Town law. WHEREAS, Town Council received testimony and documentary evidence from the appellant and all interested persons who wished to testify or submit documents. Town Council considered all testimony and materials submitted, including the record of the Planning Commission proceedings and the packet of material contained in the Council Agenda Report for their meeting on May 5, 2015, along with any and all subsequent reports and materials prepared concerning this matter. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: 1. The Town Council hereby adopts the 2015 -2023 Housing Element and the associated General Plan Amendment Application (GP -14 -002), the Addendum to the General Plan Final EIR attached hereto as Exhibit A, and refers the four recommendations from the Housing Element Advisory Board and Planning Commission to the Strategic Goals discussion in June 2015. 2. The decision constitutes a final administrative decision pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 1094.6 as adopted by section 1. 10.085 of the Town Code of the Town of Los Gatos. Any application for judicial relief from this decision must be sought within the time limits and pursuant to the procedures established by Code of Civil Procedure section 1094.6, or such shorter time as required by state and federal Law. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Town Council of the Town of Los Gatos, California, held on the 5h day of May, 2015, by the following vote: COUNCIL MEMBERS: AYES: Steve Leonardis, Rob Rennie, Marico Sayoc, Barbara Spector NAYS: Mayor Marcia Jensen ABSENT: ABSTAIN: SIGNED: MAYOR OF THE TOWN OF LOS GATOS LOS GATOS, CALIFORNIA ATTEST: CLERK ADMINISTRATOR OF THE TOWN OF LOS GATOS LOS GATOS, CALIFORNIA General Plan 2020 FEIR Addendum for the Town of Los Gatos March 201 5 Prepared By: PlaceWorks 1625 Shattuck Avenue, Suite 300 Berkeley, California 94709 510.848.3815 510.848.4315 (f) Orange County • Northern California • Los Angeles/Downtown • Los Angeles/West • Inland Empire • San Diego www.placeworks.com General Plan 2020 FEIR Addendum for the Town of Los Gatos March 201 5 In Association With: Kimley-Horn and Associates LSA Associates PLACEWORKS i Table of Contents 1. INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................. 1-1 1.1 Purpose and Content ........................................................................................................ 1-1 1.2 Approved Project ............................................................................................................... 1-2 1.3 Proposed Modified Project ............................................................................................... 1-3 1.4 Components of the Proposed Modified Project not Covered in this Addendum ........................................................................................................................... 1-4 1.5 Environmental Setting ........................................................................................................ 1-6 1.6 Dec ision to Prepare an Addendum ................................................................................ 1-8 2. ANALYSIS ............................................................................................................................................. 2-1 2.1 CEQA Guidelines ................................................................................................................. 2-1 2.2 Appendix G C h ecklist ........................................................................................................ 2-4 APPENDICES App endix A: Cultural Resources Appendix B: Traffic Analysis GENERAL PLAN 2020 FE IR ADDENDUM TOWN OF LOS GATOS TABLE OF CONTENTS ii NOVEMBER 201 4 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1 Regional and Local Location ........................................................................................... 1-7 LIST OF TABLES Table 1 Summary of Community Strategies to Meet RHNA ...................................................... 1-2 Table 2 Trip Generation Summary ................................................................................................2-30 Table 3 Trip Generation Summary, Cumulative 2020 with Modified Project .......................2-31 1-1 NOVEMBER2014 1.Introduction This chapter discusses the purpose and content of this Addendum to the Town of Los Gatos 2020 General Plan Environmental Impact Report (EIR) (certified in 2010 and referred to herein as the “Certified EIR”), as revised by previous Addenda,1 and describes the modifications to the Los Gatos 2007 -2014 Housing Element as a result of the 2015-2023 Housing Element Update (referred to herein as the “Modified Project”). 1.1PURPOSE AND CONTENT Each local jurisdiction in California is required to update its Hous ing Element in order to meet its “fair share” of the Regional Housing Need Allocation (RHNA). This Addendum covers the adoption of the Town’s updated 2015-2023 Housing Element. For the 2015-2023 Housing Element, the Town of Los Gatos was assigned a RHNA of 619 housing units. To determine land available for housing development, Town staff and the Housing Element Advisory Board (HEAB) reevaluated available housing development sites from the 2007-2014 Housing Element using current Assessor’s data, a review of the Town’s General Plan land use designations, Town Code Zoning regulations, and direction from the General Plan Committee. The 2015-2023 Housing Element update includes the following strategies to meet the Town’s RHNA: Maintaining one existing Affordable Housing Over lay Zone (AHOZ) at Oak Rim/N. Blossom Hill. Maintaining the existing Second Un it Program for non-hillside areas. Expanding the Second Unit Program area to allow unit s on larger non-conforming lots and hillside areas. Utilizing the pending North Forty Specific Plan housin g capacity for the provision of affordable units. Maintaining the existing residential zoning for the vacant parcels on Oka Road to allow market rate development. The overall strategy also includes 57 units approved since January 1, 2014. Table 1 shows the summary of strategies to meet the RHNA for 2015-2023 Housing Element by income level. The 2015-2023 Housing Element is currently anticipated to be adopted by the Town Council before the May 31, 2015 State deadline and will be reviewed for certification by the California Housing and Community Development Department (HCD). This Addendum was prepared in accordance with Section 15164 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines. 1 The first addendum to the 2020 General Plan EIR, which was considered by the Town Council in July 2012, concluded that there w ould be no new potential environmental impacts from adopting and impl ementing the Los Gatos Sustainability Plan. The Sustainability Plan included GHG Emission inventories and forecast inventories, 2020 GHG Emissions Target, GHG Reduction Measures, and Implementation and Monitoring strategies and methodologies. The second addendum, which was considered by the Town Council in November 2013, was to amend the Town Code Zoning Regulations to implement the Affordable Housing Overlay Zone (AHOZ), which was one of the strategies to meet the RHNA in the 2007-2014 Housing Element. The second addendum also revised the traffic assumptions in the Certified EIR t o reflect subsequent project approvals and changes in background traffic levels in Los Gatos. GENERAL PLAN 2020 FEIR ADDENDUM TOWN OF LOS GATOS INTRODUCTION 1-2 NOVEMBER2014 T T ABLE 1 S UMMARY OF C OMMUNITY S TRATEGIES TO M EET RHNA Very L L ow Low Moderate Above M M oderate Total RHNA 201 112 132 174 619 Approved Units 0 2 6 49 57 Oak Rim/N. Blossom Hill Affordable Housing Overlay Zone site (AHOZ) 46 0 0 0 46 Second Units under the Town’s Existing Program 0 0 28 0 28 Proposed Enhanced Second Unit Program (Non- conforming Lots and Hillside Lots) 0 27 0 0 27 Proposed North 40 Specific Plan 156 84 98 26 364 Vacant Housing Element Sites (Oka Road Sites) 0 0 0 99 99 Total Units 202 113 132 174 621 Units Above RHNA +1 +1 0 0 +2 Source: Town of Los Gatos 2020 General Plan, Technical Appendix 6, Housing Site Inventory, 2014. Prior to adopting the 2015-2023 Housing Element, the Town of Los Gatos, as the Lead Agency, is required to review the document and determine whether or not the revisions to the 2007-2014 Housing Element would change the conclusions of the Town’s 2020 General Plan EIR, including previous addenda. The purpose of this EIR Addendum is to present an analysis of the revisions to the 2007-2014 Housing Element of the Los Gatos 2020 General Plan. Chapter I, Introduction, of this Addendum presents an introduction and description of the modifications to the Housing Element. Chapter II, Analysis, presents a discussion of releva nt CEQA statutes in Sections 15162 and 15164, as well as the Initial Study checklist analysis of pote ntial environmental impacts associated with the 2015-2023 Housing Element. Since the Modified Project was found to cause no new significant impacts, a summary table of impacts has not been included. 1.2APPROVED PROJECT In 2010, the Los Gatos Town Council certified the EIR (State Clearinghouse No. 2009032078) for the Los Gatos General Plan 2020 (General Plan), whic h guides all development within the town. The Certified EIR an alyzes the potential impacts that could result from both residential and non-residential development allowed under the 2020 General Plan. It evaluated the impacts of the development of up to 1,600 new units between 2010 and 2020. Since the adoption of the 2020 General Plan and certification of the EIR, 101 units have been constructed,2 meaning that there is still a significant “envelope” of development capacity remaining in Los Gatos that has already been analyzed and mitigated through the Certified EIR. The 2 Town of Los Gatos, 2014, 2007-2014 Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA), Housing Capacity, & Production. GENERAL PLAN 2020 FEIR ADDENDUM TOWN OF LOS GATOS INTRODUCTION PLACEWORKS 1-3 2020 General Plan also included the 2007-2014 Housing Element, which identified sites with capacity for housing and contained policies and actions to s upport the provision of housing for all income groups in Los Gatos. In November 2013, the Town amended the Certified EIR through a previous Addendum, which covered revisions to the Housing Sites Inventory contained in the Technical Appendix of the 2007-2014 Housing Element and the adoption of the AHOZ on the five parcels included in the revised Inventory, wi th specific allowances and criteria for each site. Therefore, the 2007-2014 Housing Sites Inventory and the AHOZ are also considered part of the Approved Project, along with all policies and programs in the 2007-2014 Housing Element. 1.3PROPOSED MODIFIED PROJECT The proposed Modified Project is the adoption of the 2015-2023 Housing Element, which carries forward the majority of the policies and actions in the 2007-2014 Housing Element but would incl ude or allow two changes to existing Town regulations and/or the adopted 2007-2014 Housing Element, described below. These changes are evaluated to determine if there would be the potential to create new environmental impacts not previously analyzed in the Certified EIR or the November 2013 Addendum. Because those changes were not previously analyzed in the Certified EIR and its addenda, they are analyzed in this Addendum. PROPOSED ENHANCED SECOND UNIT PROGRAM 1.3.1 The proposed Enhanced Second Unit Program would add more opportunities for second units to be built, and expand on the existing Second Unit Program by changing regulations regarding where second units are permitted. The existing Second Unit Program allows second units through a ministerial perm it process in conjunction with building permits and has produced over 400 second units to date. Per Action HOU-1.2 of the Housing Element update, the Town is proposing to amend its Town Code with specific enha ncements to also allow for the construction of second units on non-conforming residential lots 10,000 square feet or greater, and on hillside residentially-zoned lots 5 acres or greater. The expansion of opportunities for second units would increase the distribution of affordable units throughout all geographic neighborhoods in Los Gatos, especially in the hillside area s. It is important to note that the chan ge in regulations would allow second units on additional parcels, but would not change the development standards to which second units are subject. Requirements for parking, setbacks, lot coverage, square footage, and relationship to the main house would not change. According to the Town’s Geographic Information Systems (GIS) maps and database, reviewed in spring 2014, the Town currently has approximately 110 non-conforming lots with sizes of 10,000 square feet or more that could accommodate second units. The Town also has approximately 25 hillside, residentially zoned lots with sizes of 5 acres or more. Therefore, a total of approximately 135 lots would be eligible for second units under the expanded regulations. Assuming that 20 percent of landowners would utilize the proposed Enhanced Second Unit Program, a total of 27 second units is anticipated in the Town of Los Gatos for the eight-year planning period. The proposed enhancements to the Town’s second unit program are consistent with the State’s Second Unit Law (Assembly Bill [AB]1866, 2002), which requires cities to allow second units on single-family and mult i-family residential-zoned parcels. GENERAL PLAN 2020 FEIR ADDENDUM TOWN OF LOS GATOS INTRODUCTION 1-4 NOVEMBER2014 PROPOSED POLICY AND ACTION UPDATES 1.3.2 The 2015-2023 Housing Element updates the policies and programs of the adopted 2007-2014 Housing Element to: Eliminate actions that the Town has completed. Remove references to the former Redevelopment Agency, which was abolished by State law in 2011, and revise policies and actions accordingly to reflect the current re sources available in the absence of redevelopment funding. Address new requirements of State Housing Element law adopted since 2010, specifically Senate Bill (SB) 812, which requires the Housing Element to include an analysis of the special housing needs of the disabled, including persons with developmental disabilities and a discussion of potential resources to meet those needs. Ensure conformance with State law. Town staff and the HEAB also examined new State requirements, AB 162 and SB 1241, which are triggered by the Housing Element but do not affect the Housing Element policies. Sinc e they do not affect the Housing Element policies, these requirements are not addressed in the 2015-2023 Housing Element Update. AB 162 mandates local jurisdictions to update flood safety policies when a Housing Element is adopted, and SB 1241 requires local jurisdictions to update wildfire safety policies when a Housing Element is adopted. 1.4COMPONENTS OF THE PROPOSED MODIFIED PROJECT NOT COVERED IN THIS ADDENDUM The components of the Modified Project listed below are either already allowe d under existing Town regulations, or have been adequately analyzed by previous CEQA documents. Therefore, these components of the Modified Project are not further analyzed in this Addendum. APPROVED UNITS 1.4.1 Since January 1, 2014, the Town has approved entitlements fo r construction of two new low, six new moderate, and 49 new above moderate income units. These projects have already been approved and were either exempt from the CEQA or were subject to separate CEQA requirements prior to approval. Therefore, they are not covered in this Addendum. EXISTING AHOZ SITES 1.4.2 The Town’s AHOZ program is set forth in Division 5 of Section 29.80, Affordable Housing Overlay Zone, of the Town Code. The 2015-2023 Housing Element proposes to utilize one AHOZ site: Oak Rim/N. Blossom Hill/Los Gatos Oaks Apartments (46 units) GENERAL PLAN 2020 FEIR ADDENDUM TOWN OF LOS GATOS INTRODUCTION PLACEWORKS 1-5 As noted above, the adoption of the AHOZ in November 2013 was subject to a separate Addendum at that time. The existing AHOZ site is not re-analyzed in this Addendum. EXISTING SECOND UNIT PROGRAM 1.4.3 The existing Second Unit Program has produced over 400 appr oved second units in the town. The second units approved under the existing Second Unit Program are approved through a ministerial permit process in conjunction with building permits. They are usually categorically exempt from CEQA per CEQA Guidelines Section 15303(a) since the majority of second unit applications are proposed for already developed si tes in existing neighborhoods as an ancillary use to existing primary dwellings. The second units are required to comply with the existing zoning requirements of the proposed sites. Based on the Town’s existing Second Unit Ordinance and its documented permit history of approving an average of four units per year during the last consecutive three-year period, the Town is anticipated to add 28 second units during the 2015- 2023 planning period. Accordin g to the Town’s Second Unit Ordinance, thes e 28 projected second units will be allowed to be constructed on conforming, non-hillside residential lots, with conformance with the Town’s design and development standards. This component of the RHNA strategy does not reflect any changes to existing Town policy, and is therefore not subject to CEQA. The continuation of the existing second unit program and development of new second units under existing regulations are not analyzed in this Addendum. PROPOSED NORTH 40 SPECIFIC PLAN 1.4.4 The largest site remaining for possible development in Los Gatos was covered by a North 40 Specific Plan Overlay designation in the Los Gatos General Plan, which requires th e preparation and adoption of a Specific Plan that will determine development details prior to approval of any entitlements. The overlay also requires that a minimum of 20 percent of any units developed on the site be reserved as affordable housing, for households at the moderate-income level or below. The Draft North 40 Specific Plan was published in 2014 an d the Council has certified its Environmental Impact Report which disclosed potential environmental impacts and mitigati on measures. The Council started its consideration of the Specific Plan in 2014 and deliberations are currently underway. The proposed North 40 Specific Plan would provide 364 units toward the Town’s RHNA. Moreover, the Certified General Plan EIR analyzed the cumulative impacts of 750 units of mixed residential types, and 580,000 square feet of retail and office development, far more than what is currently being considered as part of the Draft Specific Plan. The 2015-2023 Housing Element does not increase the capacity for housing on this site beyond what has already been analyzed in the Cert ified EIR, and therefore this Addendum does not further analyze housing in the North 40 Specific Plan Area. GENERAL PLAN 2020 FEIR ADDENDUM TOWN OF LOS GATOS INTRODUCTION 1-6 NOVEMBER2014 VACANT HOUSING SITES 1.4.5 On Oka Road, three parcels are included the Housing Element update RHNA strategy to accommodate 74 units. These sites have a potential to allow up to 99 units under the ex isting zoning. Since the 2015-2023 Housing Element would not change the existing zoning requirements, and since housing on the Oka Road sites was analyzed in the Certified EIR, this component of the RHNA strategy is not subject to further CEQA review and is not analyzed in this Addendum. 1.5ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING This Addendum addresses potential environmental impacts of adopting the 2015-2023 Housing Element and making necessary associated amendments to the 2020 General Plan and Town Code for consistency. The environmental setting for this analysis is the Town of Los Gatos. PROJECT LOCATION 1.5.1 The Town of Los Gatos is in Santa Clara County. It is part of the Bay Area region and lies ap proximately eight miles to the southwest of San Jose, the region’s largest city. It is nestled against the foothills of Californ ia’s Coast Range and is locate d on the Bay Area’s southwestern urban edge. For a more detailed description of the Town of Las Gatos and its setting, see Chapter 1 of the Los Gatos General Plan 2020, as well as Ch apters 1 and 3 of the Certified EIR. Figure 1 illustrates the location of the Project area with in the regional and local contexts. The Enhanced Second Unit Program does not identify specific sites. The quantified sites listed in the Housing Element are potential sites based on zoning districts allowing residential development. EXISTING AND SURROUNDING LAND USE 1.5.2 The predominant developed land uses in the Town of Los Gatos are residential, commercial, retail, office, medical, civic, and institutional. The town is surrounded by different jurisdic tions, including the cities of Saratoga to the west, Campbell to the north, and San Jose to the east. Also, the Town borders different open spaces and parks, including Sanborn County Park and Sierra Azul Open Space Preserves, near its hillside areas. Figure 1 Regional and Local Location Source: ESRI, 2009; Town of Los Gatos and PlaceWorks, 2014. INTRODUCTION TOWN OF LOS GATOS GENERAL PLAN 2020 FEIR ADDENDUM Los Gatos |ÿ 85 |ÿ 85 |ÿ 17 |ÿ 17 |ÿ 87 San Jose Saratoga Campbell Santa Clara Cupertino Lexington Hills Sunnyvale Monte Sereno Cambrian Park Copyright:© 2009 ESRI 012 0.5 Miles Santa Clara County Santa Cruz County Alameda County Copyright:© 2009 ESRI GENERAL PLAN 2020 FEIR ADDENDUM TOWN OF LOS GATOS INTRODUCTION 1-8 NOVEMBER2014 1.6DECISION TO PREPARE AN ADDENDUM Pursuant to CEQA Section 21166 and Section 15162 of the State CEQA Guidelines, after an EIR has been certified for a project, if some minor technical changes to the previously certified EIR are necessary, preparation of an Addendum to the EIR is appropriate. A supplemental EIR is not required unless th ere is substantial evidence that modifications to the project would substantially increase the severity of the impacts identified in the previous EIR. Under CEQA, “substantial evidence” includes facts, reasonable assumptions predicated upon facts, and expert opinion supported by facts. As determined through the detailed analysis of the Initial Stud y checklist in Chapter II of this document, the approval of the 2015-2023 Housing Element update, which includes the Enhanced Second Unit Program and revised policies and actions, would not involve new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects beyond those already identified in the Certified EIR. Given this finding, an Addendum to the Certified EIR has been prepared in accordance with CEQA Guidelines Sections 15162 and 15164. Therefore, this Addendum to the Certified EIR is sufficient. Chapter II of this Addendum contai ns additional explanation regardin g the decision to prepare an Addendum. PLACEWORKS 2-1 2. Analysis This chapter considers the provisions of Sections 15162 and 15164 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA ) statutes and discusses how an addendum to the Town of Los Gatos 2020 General Plan Environmental Impact Report (EIR ) (referred to herein as the “Certified EIR”), as modified by previous Addenda, is appropriate for the M odified P roject . This chapter also applies the CEQA Guidelines Appendix G checklist to provi de evidence to substantiate the conclusions set forth in this analysis that the M odified P roject is consistent with the findings contained in the Certified EIR and previous Addenda . 2.1 CEQA GUIDELINES Sections 15162 and 15164 in the CEQA Guidelines provide de tailed information on when subsequent EIRs must be prepared, and direction on when and how to instead issue an addendum to an EIR , respectively . This section addresses the stated requirements and instructions for the preparation of such documents, and demonstrates why the preparation of an addendum to the Los Gatos General Plan 2020 EIR (as amended) is appropriate for the Modified P roject. CEQA GUIDELINES SECTION 15162. SUBSEQUENT EI RS AND 2.1.1 NEGATIVE DECLARATION S The most applicable CEQA Guideline regarding analysis of the M odified P roject and the appropriate level of review is from Section 15162, which provides: (a) When an EIR has been certified or a negative declaration adopted for a project, no subsequent EIR shall be prepared for that project unless the lead agency determines, on the basis of substantial evidence in the light of the whole record, one or more of the following: (a)(1) Substantial changes are proposed in the project which will require major revis ions of the previous EIR or negative declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified s ignificant effects; The 2015 -2023 Housing Element Update includes the Actio n HOU -1.2, which calls for an Enhanced Second Unit Program to accommodate a portion of the Town’s RHNA. The Enhanced Second Unit Program would allow additional areas where s econd u nits will be permitted in Los Gatos . Action HOU -1.2 calls for the Town to amend the Town Code to allow new deed -restricted second units to be affordable to lower -income households on non -conforming residential lots with lot sizes of 10,000 square feet or greater and in the Hillside Residential Zone on sites that are 5 acres or lar ger . Town GIS maps and databases were reviewed in Spring 2014 to determine that there are approximately 110 non -conforming lots with sizes of 10,000 square feet or more, and 25 hillside lots of 5 ac r es or more, that could accommodate a second unit. It is e stimated that approximately 20 percent of landowners of nonconforming and hillside lots may take advantage of amended GENERAL PLAN 2020 FE IR ADDENDUM TOWN OF LOS GATOS ANALYSIS 2-2 NOVEMBER 2014 requirements to allow second units. This would produce approximately 2.8 units on non -conforming lots per year, and 0.6 units on hillside lots per year, for a total of 27 units over the eight -year planning period. Table 1 illustrates the overall community strategies to meet RHNA for the Town of Los Gatos, which includes the Enhanced Second Unit Program. The other st rategies to meet the Town’s RHNA (also listed in Table 1) would not require any amendments to the Town’s existing plans or regulations. The proposed change does not require major revisions of the C ertified EIR, and as substantiated in this document, the Mo dified P roject would not result in new significant environmental effects or significantly increase the magnitude of previously identified significant effects whereby new mitigation measures would be required. (a)(2) Substantial changes occur with respect to the circumstances under which the project is undertaken which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or Negative Declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previousl y identified significant effects; or No substantial changes have occurred with respect to the circumstances under which General Plan 2020 was crafted and adopted, and as mentioned above, the Enhanced Second Unit Program is an expansion of the existing Seco nd Unit Program . As substantiated in this document, the proposed changes would not require major revisions of the Certified EIR. (a)(3) New information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reas on able diligence at the time the previous EIR was certified as complete or the Negative Declaration was adopted, shows any of the fo llowing: (a)(3)(A) The project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous EIR or negative declar ation; (a)(3)(B) Significant effects previously examined will be substantially more severe than shown in the previous EIR; (a)(3)(C) Mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible, and would substa ntially reduce one or more significant effects of the project, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alterna tive; or (a)(3)(D) Mitigation measures or alternatives which are considerably different from those analyzed in the previous EIR would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative. Since the certification of the Certified EIR, two previous Addenda ha ve been prepared prior to the Modified Project ; however, no new, previously -unknown information of substantial importance to the General Plan 2020 has come to light that will affect the mitigation measures that were adopted and the alternatives that were considered as a pa rt of the decision -making process for the C ertified EIR. The Modified Project would not create new significant effects that were not previously analyzed in the Certified EIR or its previous Addenda, nor will the magnitude of impacts exceed the established thresholds of significance. No new mitigation measures are proposed, and the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) adopted as a part of the C ertified EIR remains adequate to mitigate impacts caused by the M odified P roject . The alternatives that were analyzed also remain applicable to the proposed changes and do not need to be reconsidered; the M odified P roject does not create new impacts that would require new analysis of project alternatives. (b) If changes to a project o r its circumstances occur or new information becomes available after adoption of a negative declaration, the lead agency shall prepare a subsequent EIR if required under subdivision (a). Otherwise the lead agency shall determine whether t o prepare a subse quent negative declaration, an addendum, or no further documentation. GENERAL PLAN 2020 FE IR ADDENDUM TOWN OF LOS GATOS ANALYSIS PLACEWORKS 2-3 Since the findings under Section 15162 subdivision (a) indicate that it is not necessary to prepare a subsequent EIR, the lea d agency has determined that it is appropriate to prepare an addendum to the certified Final EIR. (c) Once a project has been approved, the lead agency ’s role in project approval is completed, unless further discretionary approval on that project is required. Information appearing after an approval does not require reopening of that approval. If after the project is approved, any of the conditions described in subdivision (a) occurs, a subsequent EIR or negative declaration shall only be prepared by the public agency which grants the next discretionary approval for the project, if any. In this situation no other responsible agency shall grant an approval for the project until the subsequent EIR has been certified or subsequent negative declaration adopted. The Town of Los Gatos will be seeking discretionary approval for the M odified P roject to amend Chapter 29, Article 1, Division 7 of the Town Code in order to expand the Town’s second unit program. As substantiated in this document, the M odified P roject does not create new significant impacts that would require the preparation of a subsequent EIR, and an addendum to the certified Final EIR would be appropriate to satisfy the requirements of CEQA. The California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) is a responsible agency that will certify the Town’s H ousing Element Update , with a n action to implement the Enhanced Second Unit Program as noted in the Housing Element implementation action. The Town Council will consider th is A ddendum to the C ertified EIR, in addition to the C ertified EIR , in its decision - making process. (d) A subsequent EIR or subsequent negative declaration shall be given the same notice and public review as required under Se ction 15087 or Section 15072. A subsequent EIR or negative declaration shall state where the pr evious document is available and can be reviewed. Since the proposed M odified P roject would not require a subsequent EIR, it is not necessary to provide the notice or provide for the public review referenced in subdivision (d). CEQA GUIDELINES SECTION 15 164. ADDENDUM TO AN EIR 2.1.2 OR NEGATIVE DECLARATION (a) The lead agency or responsible agency shall prepare an addendum to a previously certified EIR if some changes or addition s are necessary but none of the conditions described in Section 15162 calling for p reparation of a subsequent EIR have occurred. The Enhanced Second Unit Program represents an anticipated implementing action called for in the Housing Element; this EIR A ddendum provides additional information specifically relevant to the changes to the Ce rtified EIR caused by the Enhanced Second Unit Program . As discussed above and substantiated below, none of the conditions from Section 15162 which would require a subsequent EIR are present. (b) An addendum to an adopted negative declaration may be prepar ed if only minor technical changes or additions are necessary or none of the conditions described in Section 15162 calling for the preparation of a subsequent EIR or negative declaration have occurr ed. The Los Gatos General Plan 2020 was the subject of a f ull EIR, not a negative declaration; therefore subsection (b) does not apply. GENERAL PLAN 2020 FE IR ADDENDUM TOWN OF LOS GATOS ANALYSIS 2-4 NOVEMBER 2014 (c) An addendum need not be circulated for public review but can be included in or attached to the final EIR or adopted negat ive declaration. Acknowledged. Although not required, this Addendum will be made available for public review as part of the packet for the Planning Commission and Town Council meetings at which the 2015 -2023 Housing Element Update will be considered. The packet containing this Addendum will be available thr ough the Community Development Department webpage and the Town’s regular agenda web page. (d) The decision making body shall consider the addendum with the final EIR or adopted negative declaration prior to making a decision on the project. Acknowledged. T he Town Council will consider the addendum to the General Plan EIR prior to making a decision on the 2015 -2023 Housing Element . (e) A brief explanation of the decision not to prepare a subsequent EIR pursuant to Section 15162 should be included in an ad den dum to an EIR, the lead agency ’s findings on the project, or elsewhere in the record. The explanation must be supported by substantial evidence. The preceding discussion and the analysis below serve to explain the decision not to prepare a subsequent EIR and to demonstrate, with substantial evidence from the CEQA Appendix G checklist, why a subsequent EIR is not required. 2.2 APPENDIX G CHECKLIST The following analysis uses the CEQA Guidelines Appendix G Environmental Checklist to demonstrate , using substantia l evidence, that the proposed changes caused by the Modified Project would not create new environmental impacts, or otherwise exacerbate those discussed in the certified Final EIR. Implementation of the M odified P roject would allow approximately 27 additional dwelling units from the proposed Enhanced Second Unit Program, along with the proposed policy and action updates for the 2015 -2023 Housing Element Update to :  Eliminate actions that the Town has completed.  Remove references to the former Redevelopment Agency, which was abolished by State law in 2011, and revise policies and actions accordingly to reflect the current resources available in the absence of redevelopment funding.  Address new requirements of State Housing Element law adopted since 2010, spe cifically Senate Bill (SB) 812, which requires the Housing Element to include an analysis of the special housing needs of the disabled, including persons with developmental disabilities and a discussion of potential resources to meet those needs. The Modif ied P roject does not include construction of any units or identify any specific sites for construction , but rather, would allow construction of new second units. GENERAL PLAN 2020 FE IR ADDENDUM TOWN OF LOS GATOS ANALYSIS PLACEWORKS 2-5 AESTHETICS 2.2.1 Site Name Subsequent or Supplemental EIR Required No Additional Environmental Analysis Required Substantial Change in Project or Circumstances Resulting in New Significant Effects New Information Showing Greater Significant Effects than Previous EIR New Mitigation or Alternative to Reduce Significant Effect is Declined Minor Technical Changes or Additions No Change/ No Impact Would the project: a. Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? X b. Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? X c. Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings? X d. Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? X Future development under the policies of the Housing Element Update, including second units allowed under the proposed Enhanced Second Unit Program , would be subject to the oversight and review processes envisioned by the goals and policies stipulated in the General Plan 2020 and established within the Town Code. They would be consistent with the Town’s numerous policies to promote high quality, compatible design in order to preserve the small -town visual quality and character; protect existing scenic vistas, viewsheds, and visual resources, including views of ridgelines and other prominent features of the natural environment; and minimize potential light pollution and glare. Current zoning regulations would limit potential aesthetic impacts of the construction of new second units by applying design and development standards that restrict unit size (750 square feet if attached, 950 square feet if detached); require conformance with applicable zoning setbacks, building height limits, and lot coverage limits; require b uilding form/design consistency and compatible materials; and include the unit in floor area ratio calculations. Similar to the analysis in t he C ertified EIR, adherence to existing policies and regulations would minimize potential aesthetic impacts that would be created by the proposed M odified P roject. Therefore, the M odified P roject would not create new aesthetic impacts that have not been pr eviously analyzed in the C ertified EIR, and no new mitigation measures are required. GENERAL PLAN 2020 FE IR ADDENDUM TOWN OF LOS GATOS ANALYSIS 2-6 NOVEMBER 2014 AGRICULTURE AND FORESTRY RESOURCES 2.2.2 Site Name Subsequent or Supplemental EIR Required No Additional Environmental Analysis Required Substantial Change in Project or Circumstances Resulting in New Significant Effects New Information Showing Greater Significant Effects than Previous EIR New Mitigation or Alternative to Reduce Significant Effect is Declined Minor Technical Changes or Additions No Change/ No Impact Would the project: a. Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non -agricultural use? X b. Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract? X c. Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of, forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code section 12220(g)), timberland (as defined by Public Resources Code section 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code section 51104(g))? X d. Result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest land to non -forest use? X e. Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non -agricultural use or conversion of forest land to non -forest use? X Impacts to forest resources were not analyzed in the C ertified EIR as the requirement to analyze forest resources in environmental documents did not become effective until the adoption of the Senate Bill (SB) 97 amendments (adopted December 31, 2009, effective March 18, 2010) to the CEQA Guidelines, which occurred after the commencement of the GENERAL PLAN 2020 FE IR ADDENDUM TOWN OF LOS GATOS ANALYSIS PLACEWORKS 2-7 General Plan 2020 Update and EIR. Prior to the adoption of SB 97, forest resources had not yet been generally recognized as an environmental issue. Impacts to forest resources were considered in each of the two previous Addenda, but the previous Addenda did not analyze impacts to forest resources that would result from the Modified Project. Since little agricultural land remains in Los Gatos, the Certified EIR addressed agricultural impacts under the Land Use and Planning environmental topic. The Certified EIR found one significant impact related to agricultural resources : i t was determined that the conversion of Unique Farmland to other uses in the North 40 Specific Plan Area would constitute a significant and unavoidable impact and that no feasible mitigation measure existed. None of the parcels associated with the M odified P roject are within the North 40 Specific Plan Area. As noted above, any impacts to agricultural land in the North 40 Specific Plan Area not already addressed in the Certified EIR will be required to be addressed in the Specific Plan EIR currently being prepared. These impacts are not further addressed in this Addendum. Additionally, non e of the parcels where seconds units would be allowed under the Enhanced Second Unit Program are designated as Prime, Unique, or Farmland of Statewide Importance agriculturally zoned; or designated as Williamson Act land , so no previously unidentified impacts to agricultural resources would occur. Apart from the use of lumber for construction, the Modified Project would not allow development or actions that would affect forestry resources. Development allowed by the proposed Enhanced Second Unit Program w ould be required to comply with the Town’s Tree Protection Ordinance, which strictly regulates removal of tress and potential impacts to the tree canopy on individual sites. The Town’s Tree Protection Ordinance requires a tree removal permit for any of the following protected trees:  All trees with a total diameter of 12 inches or greater of any trunk, located on developed residential property.  Four species of trees with a diameter of 8 inches or greater (Blue Oak, Black Oak , California Buckeye , and Pacific Madrone).  All trees with a diameter of 4 inches or greater of any trunk :  If l ocated on developed non -residential or vacant /underdeveloped property.  W hen removal is subject to zoning or subdivision approval.  All publicly owned trees on Town lands or public places, or in a right -of -way easement .  Any trees required to be planted or retained by any Town permits or ordinances. Also, none of the parcels where seconds units would be allowed are designated as forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code S ection 12220(g)), timberland (as defined by Public Resources Code section 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code S ection 51104 (g)). All parcels on which future second units would be allowed by the Enhanced Second Unit Pro gram would be already disturbed and developed by existing single - family dwellings. Furthermore , implementation of the Housing Element Update ’s policies and development allowed by the M odified P roject would continue to be subject to the oversight and review processes envisioned by the General Plan and established within the Town Code. Its implementation would not alter or substantially worsen the significant impact to agricultural resources specified in the Certified EIR or any other agricultural and forestry resource impact. The M odified P roject would not result in new impacts to agricultural and forestry resources. No new significant impact would occur, and no new mitigation measures are required. GENERAL PLAN 2020 FE IR ADDENDUM TOWN OF LOS GATOS ANALYSIS 2-8 NOVEMBER 2014 AIR QUALITY 2.2.3 Site Name Subsequent or Supplemental EIR Required No Additional Environmental Analysis Required Substantial Change in Project or Circumstances Resulting in New Significant Effects New Information Showing Greater Significant Effects than Previous EIR New Mitigation or Alternative to Reduce Significant Effect is Declined Minor Technical Changes or Additions No Change/ No Impact Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the follo wing determinations . Would the project: a. Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? X b. Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? X c. Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non - attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thre sholds for ozone precursors)? X d. Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? X e. Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people? X Construction of second units allowed by the M odified P roject w ould generate short -term (construction -related) emissions, as well as long -term (operation -related) emissions . I ndividual construction projects would be required to be consistent with applicable federal, State, and regional policies and regulations including those set by the California Air Resources Board (CARB) and the Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD). They would also be required to comply with the goals, policies, and actions of the Los Gatos General Plan . However, at this program matic level of analysis, because the M odified P roject would allow 27 second units over the eight -year planning period , impacts associated with the M odified P roject would be within the threshold of construction of new units analyzed in the C ertified EIR and would not substantially increase the severity of impacts identified in the Certified EIR . GENERAL PLAN 2020 FE IR ADDENDUM TOWN OF LOS GATOS ANALYSIS PLACEWORKS 2-9 The California Air Resources Board (CARB ) recommends any new housing development be set back 500 feet from freeways to avoid chronic health effects from air pollution exposure, and the BAAQMD has guidelines advising evaluation of existing and future proposed source of Toxic Air Contaminants (TACs) and/or fine inhalable particulate matter (PM 2.5 ) emissions from any sensitive receptors, such as residences. The Enhanced Second Unit Program does not designate any specific locations for future development but describes areas where second units would be permitted. Any future housing units proposed under the Enhanced Second Unit Program located near high volume roadways, including Highway 17, Highway 85, and Saratoga -Los Gatos Road, would be subject to a site -specific Health Risk Assessment per BAAQMD’s CEQA Guidelines to determine whether proposed housing would expose sensitive receptors to significant risks from air polluti on, prior to approval. The C ertified EIR found that implementation of General Plan 2020 would have a significant and unavoidable impact under air quality threshold (a). While the General Plan itself would contain a variety of provisions to reduce vehicle miles traveled (VMT), these provisions would be insufficient to reduce the impact to a less -than -significant level . It was further determined that there were no feasible mitigation measures for this significant impact. Implementation of Modified Project w ould allow a net in crease in the number of new affordable second units and associated construction activity ; however, the new second units would be located on small sites scattered the t own within existing parcels and would not require substantial ground -d isturbing activities . A ny second units would be subject to compliance of federal, State, regional, and local policies . T herefore, the Modified Project would not worsen the condition analyzed in the C ertified EIR or any other air quality impact, nor would i t result in new significant impacts to air quality. Therefore, technical changes to the air quality analysis in the Certified EIR are not required, and no new mitigation measures are necessary. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES 2.2.4 Site Name Subsequent or Supplemental E IR Required No Additional Environmental Analysis Required Substantial Change in Project or Circumstances Resulting in New Significant Effects New Information Showing Greater Significant Effects than Previous EIR New Mitigation or Alternative to Reduce Significant Effect is Declined Minor Technical Changes or Additions No Change/ No Impact Would the project: a. Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fis h and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife X GENERAL PLAN 2020 FE IR ADDENDUM TOWN OF LOS GATOS ANALYSIS 2-10 NOVEMBER 2014 Site Name Subsequent or Supplemental E IR Required No Additional Environmental Analysis Required Substantial Change in Project or Circumstances Resulting in New Significant Effects New Information Showing Greater Significant Effects than Previous EIR New Mitigation or Alternative to Reduce Significant Effect is Declined Minor Technical Changes or Additions No Change/ No Impact Service? b. Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? X c. Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? X d. Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? X e. Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? X f. Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? X GENERAL PLAN 2020 FE IR ADDENDUM TOWN OF LOS GATOS ANALYSIS PLACEWORKS 2-11 The parcels that would be subject to the M odified P roject are most likely already disturbed and have been developed with existing single -family dwellings . Some parcels on which future second units would be allowed may be located within areas identified with special -status plant and wildlife species, wetlands, or wildlife movement corridors and nursery sites ; however, d evelopment of each parcel would be subject to the oversight, review processes, and regulations that are envisioned by the General Plan; established within the Town Code (including the Tree Protection Ordinance); and/or otherwise required by State and federal statutes, in cluding those for endangered species protection . Therefore, i mplementation of the M odified P roject would neither cause new impacts to biological resources nor exacerbate any existing impacts . Technical changes to the biological resources analysis in the ce rtified Final EIR are not required, and no new mitigation measures are required. CULTURAL RESOURCES 2.2.5 Site Name Subsequent or Supplemental EIR Required No Additional Environmental Analysis Required Substantial Change in Project or Circumstances Resulting in New Significant Effects New Information Showing Greater Significant Effects than Previous EIR New Mitigation or Alternative to Reduce Significant Effect is Declined Minor Technical Changes or Additions No Change/ No Impact Would the project: a. Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in § 15064.5? X b. Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to § 15064.5? X c. Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature? X d. Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries? X A review of State inventories did not identify any archeological or historic resources on any of the Housing Element housing sites (see Appendix A). However, the second unit s allowed by the Modified Project may be located in historic districts . Since the Town’s Residential Design Guidelines recognize a ny primary structu re tha t was constructed prior to 1941 as a historic resource (unless determined otherwise), development of a second unit on a parcel containing a primary home built before 1941 could potentially impact a historic resource. However, d evelopment of any future second units allowed by the Enhanced Second Unit Program would be subject to the oversight and review processes envisioned by the GENERAL PLAN 2020 FE IR ADDENDUM TOWN OF LOS GATOS ANALYSIS 2-12 NOVEMBER 2014 General Plan and established within the Town Code, including the aforementioned Residential Design Guidelines and the Histor ic Preservation Town Code . I n the event that unknown cultural resources are discovered during construction of a second unit, development would be required to cease construction or other ground -disturbing activities, and immediately report any discovery of potentially significant cultural, paleontological, or Native American resources , as required by California Public Resources Code Section 5097.5 . Such discoveries would also continue to be subject to the jurisdiction of anthropological or tribal experts, who would be responsible for inspection and potential relocation of discovered cultural resources . P otential Native American archaeological sites are typically located near creeks in Los Gatos . It is the Town’s long -established policy in implementing CEQA to require the preparation of an initial study along with all relevant studies, surveys, and analysis, such as an archaeological evaluation, prior to the adoption of environmental documents (e.g. Negative Declaration or Environmental Impact Report) and the approval of development projects. New development on the Oka Road sites would be required to comply with CEQA. Implementation of the M odified P roject would , therefore , neither cause new impacts to cultural resources, nor exacerbate any existing impacts . T echnical changes to the cultural resources analysis in the certified Final EIR are not required, and no new mitigation measures are required. GEOLOGY AND SOILS 2.2.6 Site Name Subsequent or Supplemental EIR Required No Additional Environmental Analysis Requir ed Substantial Change in Project or Circumstances Resulting in New Significant Effects New Information Showing Greater Significant Effects than Previous EIR New Mitigation or Alternative to Reduce Significant Effect is Declined Minor Technical Changes or Additions No Change/ No Impact Would the project: a. Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: i. Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist -Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map, issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Sp ecial Publication 42. X ii. Strong seismic ground shaking? X GENERAL PLAN 2020 FE IR ADDENDUM TOWN OF LOS GATOS ANALYSIS PLACEWORKS 2-13 Site Name Subsequent or Supplemental EIR Required No Additional Environmental Analysis Requir ed iii. Seismic -related ground failure, including liquefaction? X iv. Landslides? X b. Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? X c. Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on - or off - site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? X d. Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property? X e. Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of waste water? X The Modified Project does not involve the development of any specific sites , but rather updates the policies of the Housing Element Update and describes general areas where new second units would be allowed. Second units would be allowed on nonconforming parcels in the R -1, R -M, and R -1D zones that are 10,000 square feet in area or more, and on parcels in the Hillside Residential zone that are five acres or larger in area . Unlike the existing second unit program, the Modified Project would allow second units to be constructed in the hillside areas , which are often prone to having steep slopes and lead to higher risk for landslides. The General Plan Safety Element, and the Town’s H illside Specific Plan, contain s policies that address hillside development and mitigate any potential impacts associated with developing housing on slopes in Los Gatos. Also, the Town requires geotechnical reports by a registered geologist if any land instability issues are identified. In addition, as shown in the Figure 4.5 -3 of the Certified EIR, there are several liquefaction zones near several creeks in the town . As no specific location is designated for the Modified Project, it is possible that some parcels on which second units would be allowed would be susceptible to potential liquefaction, which could cause damage and collapse as a result of settlement and lateral spreading. However, the Town Code and the California Buildi ng Code address construction on sites subject to liquefactions. The Town Building Department requires a geotechnical report as part of the Building Permit Plan Check process to avoid any soil failure. Earthmoving activities exceeding 50 cubic yards also wo uld require an Architectural and Site Application approval from the Planning Division, as well as a grading permit from the Parks and Public Works Department. In addition, proposed development in areas with slopes greater than 20 percent or with grading in consistent with the natural topography of the site characteristics is strongly discouraged and would potentially trigger additional GENERAL PLAN 2020 FE IR ADDENDUM TOWN OF LOS GATOS ANALYSIS 2-14 NOVEMBER 2014 CEQA review. However, m ost of th e anticipated applications for second units allowed by the Modified Project are expected to typically be situated near the main house and the already -developed areas of a site . The Town of Los Gatos also has several faults running through its town limit, which includes the San Andreas, Shannon, and Monte Vista faults. These faults are the most likely to produce strong seismic shaking in Los Gatos. A ny future projects under the Modified Project would be subject to the policies and regulations in the Safety Element of the Town’s General Plan and the Town’s adopted Building Code for incorporating mit igation measures to reduce the impact from the seismic shaking. Any future individual projects would be required to demonstrate compliance with all applicable local, regional, and State regulations, including best practices for the prevention of erosion and runoff related to both construction activities and to ongoing stormwater drainage . Some hillside areas have septic systems, which are regulated by the Santa Clara County Department of Environmental Health. The Santa Clara County Onsite Wastewater Treatm ent Systems Ordinance includes flexibility in siting to address on -site conditions such as steep slopes or high water tables, and requires a geotechnical report in certain instances to ensure that geologic conditions are adequately addressed. There would t herefore be no impact in regard to the ability of area so ils to support septic systems. By complying with General Plan policies and applicable regulations, there would be no change to these particular impacts as analyzed by the Certified EIR, and they would remain less than significant . Given all of the above, it is concluded that implementation of the M odified P roject would neither cause new geological and soils impacts nor exacerbate any existing ones . Technical changes to the geology and soils analysis in the C ertified EIR are not required, and no new mitigation measures are required. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS 2.2.7 Site Name Subsequent or Supplemental EIR Required No Additional Environmental Analysis Requi red Substantial Change in Project or Circumstances Resulting in New Significant Effects New Information Showing Greater Significant Effects than Previous EIR New Mitigation or Alternative to Reduce Significant Effect is Declined Minor Technical Changes or Additions No Change/ No Impact Would the project: a. Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment? X b. Conflict with an applicable plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases? X GENERAL PLAN 2020 FE IR ADDENDUM TOWN OF LOS GATOS ANALYSIS PLACEWORKS 2-15 Global climate change is not confined to a particular project area and is generally accepted as the consequence of global industrialization over the last 200 years. Implementation of the Housing Element Update and construction and operation of second units allowed by the Modified Project would not generate enough greenhouse gas (GHG ) emissions to influence global climate change significantly; hence, the issue of globa l climate change is by definition a cumulative environmental impact. The General Plan EIR found that implementation of General Plan 2020 would have a significant and unavoidable impact to GHG emissions until a climate action plan was prepared. The Town subsequently adopted the Sustainability Plan to mitigate impacts to GHG emissions. The Sustainability Plan actively serve s to reduce GHG emissions to below levels set by adopted State legislation and would therefore mitigate GHG emissions within the Town limi ts , including GHG emissions from second units . The Addendum to the Certified EIR prepared in July 2012 to cover the adoption of the Sustainability Plan concluded that GHG impacts would be less than significant . Any development allowed under the Modified Pr oject would be required to be consistent with the measures in the adopted Sustainability Plan. The M odified P roject would allow 27 housing units and could therefore increase vehicle trips . However, a dherence to the Sustainability Plan, the General Plan, and S tatewide measures, including the Building and Energy Efficiency Standards (part of the California Building Code), and the California Green Building Code (CALGreen) adopted for the purpose of reducing GHG emissions would ensure that the M odified P roject would neither cause a substantial increase in GHG emissions impacts nor exacerbate any existing impacts. Technical changes to the C ertified EIR as revised by the previous Addenda are not required, and no new mitigation measures are required. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS 2.2.8 Site Name Subsequent or Supplemental EIR Required No Additional Environmental Analysis Required Substantial Change in Project or Circumstances Resulting in New Significant Effects New Information Showing Greater Significant Effects than Previous EIR New Mitigation or Alternative to Reduce Significant Effect is Declined Minor Technical Changes or Additions No Change/ No Impact Would the project: a. Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? X b. Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? X c. Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely X GENERAL PLAN 2020 FE IR ADDENDUM TOWN OF LOS GATOS ANALYSIS 2-16 NOVEMBER 2014 Site Name Subsequent or Supplemental EIR Required No Additional Environmental Analysis Required Substantial Change in Project or Circumstances Resulting in New Significant Effects New Information Showing Greater Significant Effects than Previous EIR New Mitigation or Alternative to Reduce Significant Effect is Declined Minor Technical Changes or Additions No Change/ No Impact hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one -quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? d. Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? X e. For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not bee n adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? X f. For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? X g. Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? X h. Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? X The parcels on which new second units would be allowed by the Enhanced Second Unit Program are already at least partially disturbed with existing single -family uses, and are located within broader areas characterized by urban uses . The GENERAL PLAN 2020 FE IR ADDENDUM TOWN OF LOS GATOS ANALYSIS PLACEWORKS 2-17 potential second units would never occur on vacant sites since they would be reviewed either as a new primary dwelling, if the unit is the only dwelling proposed, or in conjunction with a new home. Since potential locations for the Enhanced Second Unit Program include hillside areas, where most of the Very High Fire Severity Zone is located, any future second units proposed in the hillside areas and within the fire hazard severity zones would be required to meet the same fire prevention and protection requirements imposed by the Town as for main structures. These requirements include, but are not limited to : Class A roofing, adequate water pressure requirements or on -site storage , sprinklers, and a 100 -foot defensible zone around structure s . C onsistency with policies in the Safety Elem ent of the Town’s General Plan and Hillside Development standards and guidelines would minimize wildfire hazards. Finally , all development proposed in Los Gatos and within the fire hazard severity zones must be reviewed by the Santa Clara County Central Fi re Protection Districts prior to approval of the project. Currently, there are no hazardous sites o r facilities , including federal Superfund sites, State response sites, voluntary cleanup sites, or school cleanup sites, in Los Gatos requiring cleanup , acco rding to the California Department of Toxic Substances Control. The potential projects under the Enhanced Second Unit Program would all be second units, which would be in addition to existing residential uses. R esidential land use s are not associated with hazardous materials handling, transportation, or storage . The development of these residential uses would accommodate 27 new second units over eight years , which would not generate any new impacts to emergency response, evacuations, or general preparedness . Moreover, compliance with existing federal, State, and regional laws and regulations, as well as goals and policies in the Town’s General Plan and the regulations in the Town Code, would reduce the Modified Project’s potential risks and impacts associate d with hazardous materials . Project implementation would not contravene any aspects of the General Plan, including land use designations, allowed uses, or oversight procedures that address hazards and hazardous materials . Implementation of the M odified P roject would, therefore , neither cause new hazards and hazardous materials impacts nor exacerbate any existing ones . Technical changes to the hazards and hazardous materials analysis in the C ertified EIR are not required, and no new mi tigation measures ar e required. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY 2.2.9 Site Name Subsequent or Supplemental EIR Required No Additional Environmental Analysis Required Substantial Change in Project or Circumstances Resulting in New Significant Effects New Information Showing Greater Significant Effects than Previous EIR New Mitigation or Alternative to Reduce Significant Effect is Declined Minor Technical Changes or Additions No Change/ No Impact Would the project: a. Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge X GENERAL PLAN 2020 FE IR ADDENDUM TOWN OF LOS GATOS ANALYSIS 2-18 NOVEMBER 2014 Site Name Subsequent or Supplemental EIR Required No Additional Environmental Analysis Required Substantial Change in Project or Circumstances Resulting in New Significant Effects New Information Showing Greater Significant Effects than Previous EIR New Mitigation or Alternative to Reduce Significant Effect is Declined Minor Technical Changes or Additions No Change/ No Impact requirements? b. Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre - existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? X c. Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which would result in a substantial erosion or siltation on - or off -site? X d. Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on - or off -site? X e. Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned storm water drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? X f. Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? X GENERAL PLAN 2020 FE IR ADDENDUM TOWN OF LOS GATOS ANALYSIS PLACEWORKS 2-19 Site Name Subsequent or Supplemental EIR Required No Additional Environmental Analysis Required Substantial Change in Project or Circumstances Resulting in New Significant Effects New Information Showing Greater Significant Effects than Previous EIR New Mitigation or Alternative to Reduce Significant Effect is Declined Minor Technical Changes or Additions No Change/ No Impact g. Place housing within a 100 -year flood hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? X h. Place within a 100 -year flood hazard area structures which would impede or redirect flood flows? X i. Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? X j. Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? X Compliance and consistency with existing federal, State, and local water quality regulations and policies, including those specified in the Town’s General Plan, would minimize potential water quality impacts associated with construction and operation of the M odified P roject . The Modified Project would update the policies of the Town’s Housing Element and allow second units on an expanded range of parcels in Los Gatos , and is projected to allow no more than 27 new second units over the eight -year planning period . T he construction and operation of new second units would be subject to applicable local, State , and federal standards and best practices for managing on - and off -site water quality. These additional second units anticipated would therefore not contribute to new or exacerbated water quality impacts. Additionally, the M odified P roject would not result in new ground water usage in the immediate vicinity beyond the amo unt of water demand already ana lyzed in the Certified EIR. A s discussed in the General Plan EIR, application of General Plan policies related to runoff and groundwater recharge would prevent negative development -related impacts to groundwater, drainage patterns, and polluted runoff. None of the sites would experience development that would alter the drainage pattern or course of a stream or river. Los Gatos includes both 100 -year and 500 -ye ar floodplains within its town limit. Most of Los Gatos falls under the 500 -year flood plain, but a small area fall s within the 100 -year flood plain, which has higher risk of flooding. As the Modified Project does not designate specific sites for development, but rather indicates general areas throughout the town (including flatland and hillsides) where second units would be permitted , parcels on which second units would be allowed by the Modified Project may fall within the 100 -year floodplain. However, Ge neral Plan policies would ensure that development would either not take place in the 100 -year flood plain or would be required to show it adequately mitigates potential flooding impacts. Also, any future second units would be subject to the oversight and review processes and standards that are GENERAL PLAN 2020 FE IR ADDENDUM TOWN OF LOS GATOS ANALYSIS 2-20 NOVEMBER 2014 envisioned by the General Plan, established within the Town Code, and/or otherwise required by State and federal regulations. Through the environmental review process for the individual projects, additional mitigation may be required to further reduce impacts and risks associated with flood hazards . There are no areas of Los Gatos that have been identified as vulnerable to tsunami or seiche . However, the Enhanced Second Unit Program would allow second units to be bui lt on some of hillside areas, where steeper slopes exist and may increase potential risk of mudslides. C onformance with the policies of the General Plan , however, would mitigate conditions conducive to mudslides, further reducing potential impacts , if need ed . Therefore, potential impacts from these phenomena would be unchanged from the Certified EIR and would remain less than significant . Overall, the M odified P roject would not contravene any aspects of the General Plan, including land use designations, allowed uses, or oversight procedures that address hydrology and water quality. Implementation of the M odified P roject would therefore neither cause new hydrology or water quality impacts, nor exacerbate any existing ones. Technical changes to the hydrology and water quality analysis in the C ertified EIR are not required, and no new mitigation measures are required. LAND USE AND PLANNIN G 2.2.10 Site Name Subsequent or Supplemental EIR Required No Additional Environmental Analysis Required Substantial Change in Project or Circumstances Resulting in New Significant Effects New Information Showing Greater Significant Effects than Previous EIR New Mitigation or Alternati ve to Reduce Significant Effect is Declined Minor Technical Changes or Additions No Change/ No Impact Would the project: a. Physically divide an established community? X b. Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? X c. Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan? X GENERAL PLAN 2020 FE IR ADDENDUM TOWN OF LOS GATOS ANALYSIS PLACEWORKS 2-21 The Modified Project would not physically divide an established community as it would only allow development of second units on existing residential parcels , which would be in addition to already existing single -family homes . F uture projects under the Enhanced Second Unit Program may fall within areas of sensitive habitats or species identified in the Santa Clara Valley Habitat Plan . However, because new second units would be constructed on previously disturbed sites, the Modified Project would not affect undisturbed sites with high habitat value. The C ertified EIR found that implementation of General Plan 2020 would have a significant and unavoidable impact in regard to the conversion of unique farmland in the North 40 Specific Plan Area to urban use and that no feasible mitigation measure existed . Future second units allowed under the Enhanced Second Unit Program would not be located within the North 40 Specific Plan A rea. In addition , individual projects, including second units allowed under the Enhanced Second Unit Program, would be subject to the oversight and review processes and standards that are envisioned or established by the General Plan, other applicable plans, or the Town Code . Implementation of the M odified P roject would therefore not lead to new impacts or substantially worsen existing impacts that divide an established community, conflict with any land use plans, or conflict with any habitat or natural community conservation plans. Technical changes to the land use and planning analysis in the C ertified EIR are not required, and no new mi tigation measures are required. MINERAL RESOURCES 2.2.11 Site Name Subsequent or Supplemental EIR Required No Additional E nvironmental Analysis Required Substantial Change in Project or Circumstances Resulting in New Significant Effects New Information Showing Greater Significant Effects than Previous EIR New Mitigation or Alternative to Reduce Significant Effect is Declined Minor Technical Changes or Additions No Change/ No Impact Would the project: a. Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be a value to the region and the residents of the state? X b. Result in the loss of availability of a locally important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? X Analysis of mineral resources was removed from the Certified EIR because the result of the Scoping Process determined that mineral resources are not present in Los Gatos. P otential locations for the Enhanced Second Unit Program contain existing residential development , and are located within broader areas characterized by urban uses. These sites are not GENERAL PLAN 2020 FE IR ADDENDUM TOWN OF LOS GATOS ANALYSIS 2-22 NOVEMBER 2014 mineral extraction or recovery sites . Additionally, mineral or other resource extraction would not be compatible with the surrounding uses of the sites. Therefore, implementation of the M odified P roject would not create a loss in availability of mineral r esources . Implementation of the Modified Project would therefore neither cause new mineral resource impacts, nor exacerbate any existing ones . No new mitigation measures are required. NOISE 2.2.12 Site Name Subsequent or Supplemental EIR Required No Additional Environmental Analysis Required Substantial Change in Project or Circumstances Resulting in New Significant Effects New Information Showing Greater Significant Effects than Previous EIR New Mitigation or Alternative to Reduce Significant Effect is Declined Minor Technical Changes or Additions No Change/ No Impact Would the project: a. Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? X b. Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels? X c. A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? X d. A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? X e. For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? X f. For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the X GENERAL PLAN 2020 FE IR ADDENDUM TOWN OF LOS GATOS ANALYSIS PLACEWORKS 2-23 Site Name Subsequent or Supplemental EIR Required No Additional Environmental Analysis Required Substantial Change in Project or Circumstances Resulting in New Significant Effects New Information Showing Greater Significant Effects than Previous EIR New Mitigation or Alternative to Reduce Significant Effect is Declined Minor Technical Changes or Additions No Change/ No Impact project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? Construction and operation of individual second units allowed under the M odified P roject would generate both temporary and permanent noise and vibration impacts. Individual projects would be subject to the oversight and review processes that are implemented through the Town’s General Plan, established within the Town Code, and/or otherwise required by pertinent federal and S tate regulations. In compliance with these local and State standards, individual projects under the Enhanced Second Unit Program would be required to ensure interior and exterior noise levels that are consistent with applicable land use compatibility standards. Although future second units allow ed by the Modified Project may be constructed on sites along Highways 17 and 85 and , therefore , could potentially be exposed t o noise levels above the Town’s guidelines for acceptable land use compatibility , compliance with the goals, policies, and actions of the General Plan, as well as the Town’s Noise Ordinance and the California Noise Insulation Standards , would control these impacts . Additionally, the M odified P roject would not contravene any aspects of the General Plan, including land use designations , allowed site uses, noise limits, or other restrictions that address noise and vibration impacts. Implementation of the M odified P roject would neither cause new noise impacts, nor exacerbate any existing ones. Thus, there would be no change from the impa cts analyzed under the C ertified EIR, and these development noise impacts would , therefore , remain less than significant . T echnical changes to the noise and vibration analysis in the certified Final EIR are not required and no new mitigation measures are required. POPULATION AND HOUSI NG 2.2.13 Site Name Subsequent or Supplemental EIR Required No Additional Environmental Analysis R equired Substantial Change in Project or Circumstances Resulting in New Significant Effects New Information Showing Greater Significant Effects than Previous EIR New Mitigation or Alternative to Reduce Significant Effect is Declined Minor Technical Changes or Additions No Change/ No Impact Would the project: a. Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and X GENERAL PLAN 2020 FE IR ADDENDUM TOWN OF LOS GATOS ANALYSIS 2-24 NOVEMBER 2014 Site Name Subsequent or Supplemental EIR Required No Additional Environmental Analysis R equired businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? b. Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? X c. Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? X The M odified P roject would allow a realistic development capacity of up to 621 new units . However, only 27 of these units represent additional growth than has not already been evaluated in existing Town plans and CEQA reports. Therefore, the Modified Project would allow new development accommodating approximately 65 residents .1 This increase would not induce significant population growth in Los Gatos and is well wi thin the envelope of development that was analyzed in the Certified EIR . T he Enhanced Second Unit Program would allow for housing on more sites in the town that already contain existing housing. Therefore, the Modified Project would serve to focus growth o n areas already designated for residential use, rather than extending services to new growth areas. Also, implementation of the M odified P roject would not displace any existing houses or peopl e. Any future second units constructed under the Enhanced Second Unit Program would add opportunities for additional affordable housing, and therefore construction of replacement housing elsewhere would not be necessary and the impact would be less than significant . Additionally, t he M odified P roject would not contrave ne any aspects of the General Plan. Implementation of the M odified P roject would therefore neither cause new population and housing impacts, nor exacerbate any existing ones. Technical changes to the population and housing analysis in the C ertified EIR are not required, and no new mitigation measures are required. PUBLIC SERVICES 2.2.14 Site Name Subsequent or Supplemental EIR Required No Additional Environmental Analysis Required Substantial Change in Project or Circumstances Resulting in New Significant Effects New Information Showing Greater Significant Effects than Previous EIR New Mitigation or Alternative to Reduce Significant Effect is Declined Minor Technical Changes or Additions No Change/ No Impact Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts 1 Assuming 2.35 persons per household, based on the 2010 Decennial Census average household size for Los Gatos. Because second units would be limited in size (750 square feet if attached, 950 square feet if detached), actual household sizes may be smaller for new second units. However, the Town’s average household size is used to provide a conservative analysis. GENERAL PLAN 2020 FE IR ADDENDUM TOWN OF LOS GATOS ANALYSIS PLACEWORKS 2-25 Site Name Subsequent or Supplemental EIR Required No Additional Environmental Analysis Required Substantial Change in Project or Circumstances Resulting in New Significant Effects New Information Showing Greater Significant Effects than Previous EIR New Mitigation or Alternative to Reduce Significant Effect is Declined Minor Technical Changes or Additions No Change/ No Impact associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significa nt environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: a. Fire protection ? X b. Police protection ? X c. Schools ? X d. Parks ? X e. Other public facilities ? X The Modified Project would allow an estimated 27 second units to be built in Los Gatos over the next eight years , housing approximately 65 new residents, which w ould increase demands for public services above existing levels , but not above the anticipated future levels analyzed in the Certified EIR . Since second units would be built on sites already containing existing residential uses, the Modified Project would not require new areas to be served by pub lic service providers. Approximately 65 new residents would not result in the need for new or physically altered facilities, and would allow the City to maintain acceptable service ratios, response time, or other performance objectives for police protecti on services .2 The Modified Project would also result in increased demands for fire protection services above existing levels but not above the anticipated future levels analyzed in the Certified EIR . F ire and police services operate on mutual aid agreement s. The Santa Clara Fire Department would review proposed second units as a part of the building permit review process, and new units would be required to comply with wildland fire requirements previously noted (e.g. Class A roofing, adequate water pressure , sprinklers, and a 100 -foot defensible zone around structure s). The Santa Clara Fire Department provides contract fire protection services to the Town and already serves the areas where second units would be allowed under the Modified Project. B oth the Sa nta Clara Fire Department and Los Gatos/Monte Sereno Police Department would be able to continue 2 Matt Frisby, Police Chief, Town of Los Gatos Police Department, e mail c ommunications with PlaceWorks, August 14, 2014. GENERAL PLAN 2020 FE IR ADDENDUM TOWN OF LOS GATOS ANALYSIS 2-26 NOVEMBER 2014 providing mutual fire and law enforcement protection services .3 Additionally, the General Plan includes goals, policies, and actions that improve response times and support the activities of the fire and police departments . Adherence to the General Plan would reduce potential impacts to fire and law enforcement services to the level of less than significant . The 27 new dwelling units, which would accommodate approximately 65 new residents, would slightly increase the needs for the school services above existing levels , but not above the anticipated future levels analyzed in the Certified EIR . Because new development allowed by the Modified Project would be located on scattered sites throughout the town, it is unknown which districts would be affected by the Modified Project. H owever, t he need for additional school services is addressed by compliance with school impact assessment fees per Senate Bill 50 . Pursua nt to Section 65996(3 )(h) of the California Government Code, payment of these fees is considered full and complete mitigation that would offset impacts from any increased demand for school facilities. Development of an additional 27 second units would sl ightly increase the need for additional park space and library facilities above existing levels , but not above the anticipated future levels analyzed in the Certified EIR . The General Plan contains goals, policies, and actions that ensure adequate and acce ssible park , open space , and trail systems are provided and that Los Gatos residents have sufficient access to library services and facilities . Compliance with these regulations would further ensure that impacts associated with the M odified P roject would r emain at less -than -significant levels. Implementation of the Modified Project would not contravene any aspects of the General Plan, including land use designations and allowed building intensities that could impact demand for Town services . Therefore, Pr oject implementation would neither cause new impacts in regard to provision of Town services, nor exacerbate any existing ones. Technical changes to the public services analysis in the C ertified EIR are not required, and no new mitigation measures are re quired. RECREATION 2.2.15 Site Name Subsequent or Supplemental EIR Required No Additional Environmental Analysis Required Substantial Change in Project or Circumstances Resulting in New Significant Effects New Information Showing Greater Significant Effects than Previous EIR New Mitigation or Alternative to Reduce Significant Effect is Declined Minor Technical Changes or Additions No Change/ No Impact Would the project: a. Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical X 3 Doug Harding, Fire Marshal, Santa Clara County Fire Department, phone communications with PlaceWorks, September 24, 2014. GENERAL PLAN 2020 FE IR ADDENDUM TOWN OF LOS GATOS ANALYSIS PLACEWORKS 2-27 Site Name Subsequent or Supplemental EIR Required No Additional Environmental Analysis Required Substantial Change in Project or Circumstances Resulting in New Significant Effects New Information Showing Greater Significant Effects than Previous EIR New Mitigation or Alternative to Reduce Significant Effect is Declined Minor Technical Changes or Additions No Change/ No Impact deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? b. Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? X The potential increase of 27 second unit s that would be allowed under the Enhanced Second Unit Program c ould generate approximately 6 5 new residents who would require access to park and open space and recreational facilities. As discussed above, this amount of new development and population is within the envelope analyzed in the Certified EIR, and the General Plan contains goals, policies, and actions that ensure adequate and accessible park , open space , and trail systems are provided. Expansion of park and recreational facilities would have the potential to result in environmental impacts. However, new second units allowed by the Modified Project would be located on scattered sites throughout the town and would therefore not be expected to over -burden a specific park or recreational facility in particular. In addition, as concluded in the C ertified EIR, with adherence to existing regulations and policies of the Town’s General Plan, impacts would be less than significant . Implementation of the M odified P roject would therefore neither cause new impacts in regard to recreational opportunities/facilities, nor exacerbate any existing ones. Technical changes to the recreation analysis in the C ertified EIR are not required, and no new mitigation measures are required. GENERAL PLAN 2020 FE IR ADDENDUM TOWN OF LOS GATOS ANALYSIS 2-28 NOVEMBER 2014 TRAFFIC 2.2.16 Site Name Subsequent or Supplemental EIR Required No Additional Environmental Analysis Required Substantial Change in Project or Circumstances Resulting in New Significant Effects New Information Showing Greater Significant Effects than Previous EIR New Mitigation or Alternative to Reduce Significant Effect is Declined Minor Technical Changes or Additions No Change/ No Impact Would the project: a. Conflict with an applicable plan, ordinance or policy establishing measures of effectiveness for the performance of the circulation system, taking into account all modes of transportation including mass transit and non -motorized travel and relevant components of the circulation system, including but not limited to intersections, streets, highways and freeways, pedestrian and bicycle paths, and mass transit? X b. Conflic t with an applicable congestion management program, including, but not limited to level of service standards and travel demand measures, or other standards established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? X c. Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? X d. Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? X e. Result in inadequate emergency access? X f. Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs regarding public transit, bicycle, or X GENERAL PLAN 2020 FE IR ADDENDUM TOWN OF LOS GATOS ANALYSIS PLACEWORKS 2-29 Site Name Subsequent or Supplemental EIR Required No Additional Environmental Analysis Required Substantial Change in Project or Circumstances Resulting in New Significant Effects New Information Showing Greater Significant Effects than Previous EIR New Mitigation or Alternative to Reduce Significant Effect is Declined Minor Technical Changes or Additions No Change/ No Impact pedestrian facilities, or otherwise decrease the performance or safety of such facilities? This section addresses potential transportation impacts of the Modified Project, based on the analysis completed for the Certified EIR, as revised by subsequent Addenda . A dditional information and data used in this transportation analysis can be found in Appendix B. The Modified Project updates the policies in the Town’s Housing Element and would allow 27 additional housing units that would be distributed on eligible lots throughout Los Gatos . The number of proposed trips was calculated based on rates contained in the Institute of Transportation Engineer’s (ITE) publication, Trip Generation .4 The Modified Project was assumed to be the residential condominium/townhouse land use, due to the nature of the second dwelling units. The second dwelling units would be restricted to a maximum size of 750 square feet and one bedroom for attached units, and a maximum of 900 square feet and two bedrooms for detached units. These unit sizes more closely resemble a townhouse or condominium than a single -family detached home. In addition, if the units are rented out, they would be held to below market rate standards, which typically have a lower vehicular trip generation rate. Table 2 shows the trip generation fo r the Modified Project. As shown in Table 2, development allowed under t he Modified P roject is expected to generate 18 trips in the AM peak hour and 21 trips in the PM peak hour. The locations of the assumed P roject trips were scattered throughout the Tow n of Los Gatos where residential units that fit the new criteria of non -conforming lots over 10,000 square feet or hillside lots are located. As shown in Table 3, all study intersections would operate acceptably (at LOS D or better) under the Modified Proj ect conditions . 4 Institute of Transportation Engineers, Trip Generation 9 th Edition , Washington D.C., 2012. GENERAL PLAN 2020 FE IR ADDENDUM TOWN OF LOS GATOS ANALYSIS 2-30 NOVEMBER 2014 T ABLE 2 T RIP G ENERATION S UMMARY Time Period Land Use Trips In Trips Out Trips Total Daily Residential Condominium/Townhouse (27 Dwelling Units) 103 103 206 AM Peak Residential Condominium/Townhouse (27 Dwelling Units) 3 15 18 PM Peak Residential Condominium/Townhouse (27 Dwelling Units) 14 7 21 Source: Kimley -Horn and Associates, 2014 . The Town’s General Plan includes a number of goals and policies to address future impacts to the capacity of the roadway system.  Transportation Goal TRA -1 and Policy TRA -1.1 require that development not exceed transportation capacity and that transportation systems meet current and future nee ds of residents and businesses;  Policy TRA -3.3 calls for an evaluation of all new developm ents to ensure that they are in compliance with the Town’s LOS intersection policy;  Policy TRA -3.4 states that new projects shall not cause an intersection at LOS of Level A, B, or C to drop more than one level and an intersection at LOS D or below to drop at all; and  Policy TRA -3.5 states that if a new project causes an intersection LOS to drop more than one level from Level A, B, or C or to drop at all from Level D or below, the project shall mitigate traffic so that the LOS will remain at an acceptable level. Action TRA -3.1 implement s the local roadway improvements listed in Section E.2 and E.3 of Transportation Element of the 2020 General Plan in the Capital Improvements Program (CIP).With the implementation of these improvements, all study intersecti ons would operate at LOS D or better with the Modified Project. The Modified Project does not include any components that would affect air travel, public transit, pedestrian or bicycle circulation. New second units allowed by the Modified Project would be constructed on sites containing existing single - family residences, and would not require physical changes that would pose safety hazards or disrupt existing circulation. Transportation impacts would be less than significant , and no new mitigation measures are required. GENERAL PLAN 2020 FE IR ADDENDUM TOWN OF LOS GATOS ANALYSIS PLACEWORKS 2-31 T ABLE 3 T RIP G ENERATION S UMMARY , C UMULATIVE 2020 WITH M ODIFIED P ROJECT Int # Intersection Traffic Control Town Criteria AM PM Critical Approach(es) LOS Delay (sec) Δ Delay LOS Delay (sec) Δ Delay 1 Winchester Blvd. and Knowles Dr. Signal D C 25.8 -5.0 C- 35.0 -8.8 SB, EB 2 Winchester Blvd. and Hwy 85 NB On Ramp Signal D B 16.4 -0.9 C+ 21.4 -2.5 SB 3 Winchester Blvd. and Hwy 85 SB Off Ramp Signal D B 16.5 -2.2 B 12.5 -2.0 NB, SB 4 Winchester Blvd. and Lark Ave. Signal D C 24.1 -0.8 C 24.0 0.3 SB 5 Lark Ave. and Oka Rd. Signal D B- 19.0 -0.5 B 17.0 -1.9 WB 6 Lark Ave. and Hwy 17 SB Ramps – Garden Hill Dr. Signal D C 26.3 -11.0 C 30.9 -0.4 WB, EB 7 Lark Ave. and Hwy 17 NB Ramps Signal D B- 19.5 2.5 B 16.4 -1.5 WB, EB 8 Los Gatos Blvd. and Samaritan Dr. Signal D C 30.0 -6.0 D 46.2 10.6 NB, SB, WB 9 Los Gatos Blvd. and Lark Ave. Signal D D+ 38.6 -1.5 C- 34.7 -12.8 NB, SB 10 Los Gatos Blvd. and Blossom Hill Rd. Signal D D+ 35.6 2.9 C- 33.1 -2.0 NB, SB 11 Los Gatos Blvd. and Roberts Rd. – Shannon Rd. Signal D C- 32.6 -0.3 C 24.5 1.9 NB 12 Los Gatos Blvd. and Nino Ave. Signal D C 23.4 5.3 B- 19.8 10.5 SB 13 Los Gatos Blvd. and Kennedy Rd. – Caldwell Ave. Signal D C- 32.4 0.0 C 29.7 0.1 NB 14 Los Gatos Blvd. and Saratoga - Los Gatos Rd. Signal D D+ 36.2 1.4 D- 51.6 2.2 SB, EB 15 Saratoga - Los Gatos Rd. and University Ave. Signal D C 30.2 4.3 D 47.4 16.4 EB 16 W. Main St. and University Ave. Signal D C+ 20.7 0.0 C 26.3 0.8 WB, SB 17 Santa Cruz Ave. and W. Main St. Signal D C 27.0 -0.6 C 26.2 -12.1 WB, NB 18 Santa Cruz Ave. and Saratoga - Los Gatos Rd. Signal D D 48.6 0.1 D 42.7 -1.3 WB, EB 19 Santa Cruz – Winchester Blvd. and Blossom Hill – Mariposa Ave. Signal D D 41.3 2.8 D+ 35.9 1.1 WB, SB 20 Blossom Hill Rd. and E. Roberts Rd. Signal D C 27.6 1.8 B- 19.8 4.0 EB 21 Blossom Hill Rd. and Cherry Blossom Lane Signal D C+ 22.5 4.9 B 17.1 4.0 WB GENERAL PLAN 2020 FE IR ADDENDUM TOWN OF LOS GATOS ANALYSIS 2-32 NOVEMBER 2014 T ABLE 3 T RIP G ENERATION S UMMARY , C UMULATIVE 2020 WITH M ODIFIED P ROJECT Int # Intersection Traffic Control Town Criteria AM PM Critical Approach(es) LOS Delay (sec) Δ Delay LOS Delay (sec) Δ Delay 22 Blossom Hill Rd. and Union Ave. Signal D B 17.6 -0.8 D 43.0 -4.9 EB, WB 23 Blossom Hill Rd. and Los Gatos – Almaden Rd. Signal D C 30.3 -12.0 D 49.8 -4.6 EB, SB, WB 24 Winchester Blvd. and Daves Ave. Signal D C 24.1 4.5 B- 19.8 3.2 SB 25 Lark Ave. and University Ave. Signal D C 27.3 8.5 C 28.5 1.8 WB, EB 26 Pollard Rd. and More Ave. Signal D C+ 20.8 -3.5 C 25.7 4.8 EB 27 Knowles Dr. and Dardanelli Lane Signal D B+ 10.3 -1.0 B 12.7 -1.6 WB, EB 28 Winchester Blvd. and Wimbledon Dr. Signal D B 16.5 -9.5 B 16.6 -0.2 NB, SB 29 Los Gatos Blvd. and Hwy 85 SB Ramps Signal D B- 19.8 -11.7 C 29.0 -7.8 NB, SB, EB 30 Los Gatos Blvd. and Garden Gateway Signal D B- 18.9 -2.0 B- 19.1 1.3 NB, SB 31 Los Gatos Blvd. and Los Gatos Village Square Signal D B+ 11.8 0.9 B 14.9 -2.1 NB, SB 32 Los Gatos Blvd. and Almaden Rd. – Chirco Dr. Signal D C 25.0 -1.2 C 23.8 -2.2 NB, SB 33 Santa Cruz Ave. and Andrews St . Signal D B 13.9 -1.2 B 16.4 -1.6 SB 34 Blossom Hill Rd. and University Ave. Signal D C 28.0 5.9 C- 32.5 8.5 WB, EB 35 Blossom Hill Rd. and W. Roberts Rd. Signal D B 14.7 0.4 B- 19.4 -0.5 WB, EB 36 Blossom Hill Rd. and Leigh Ave. Signal D B 13.0 2.2 B- 19.7 -4.4 WB, EB 37 Blossom Hill Rd. and Harwood Rd. Signal D B 14.4 -1.7 B- 18.0 0.0 WB, EB 38 Los Gatos - Almaden Rd. and National Ave. Signal D B 13.5 1.6 B 15.7 -3.5 WB, EB 39 Winchester Boulevard and Albright Way Worst Approach Side Street Stop Control D A C 0.0 15.5 - - A B 0.3 13.5 - - WB 40 Winchester Boulevard and Courtyard Club Entrance Signal D C 25.1 - C 26.0 - NB Source: Ki mley -Horn and Associates, 2014. GENERAL PLAN 2020 FE IR ADDENDUM TOWN OF LOS GATOS ANALYSIS PLACEWORKS 2-33 UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS 2.2.17 Site Name Subsequent or Supplemental EIR Required No Additional Environmental Analysis Required Substantial Change in Project or Circumstances Resulting in New Significant Effects New Information Showing Greater Significant Effects than Previous EIR New Mitigation or Alternative to Reduce Significant Effect is Declined Minor Technical Changes or Additions No Change/ No Impact Would the project: a. Exceed waste water treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? X b. Require or result in the construction of new water or waste water treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? X c. Require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? X d. Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? X e. Result in a determination by the waste water treatment provider, which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project’s projected demand in addition to the provider’s existing commitments? X f. Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project’s solid waste disposal needs? X g. Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste? X GENERAL PLAN 2020 FE IR ADDENDUM TOWN OF LOS GATOS ANALYSIS 2-34 NOVEMBER 2014 New second units allowed by t he M odified P roject would be required to comply with existing federal, State, and local water quality requirements and regulations, including those specified in the General Plan 2020 in order to minimize impacts to water quality . The M odified P roject would increase water demand over existing lev els by 6,75 0 gallons of water per day at a rate of 25 0 gallon s of water per housing unit per day. The C ertified EIR analyzed a substantially greater amount of residential development and include d much higher estimated water use in its water supply impact a nalysis . The Certified EIR determined that the San Jose Water Company (SJWC) would have sufficient capacity to meet water service demand. The sanitary water demand would also slightly increase by 3 ,2 67 gallons of wastewater per day, at a rate of 121 gallons per housing unit per day, which is equivalent to less than one percent of the total West Valley Sanitation District (WVSD) wastewater allocation and would be within the current capacity of 12.1 million gallons per day, as determin ed in the Certified EIR. S ome hillside areas have septic systems , which are regulated by the Santa Clara County Department of Environmental Health. According to the County’s Onsite Wastewater Treatment Systems (OWTS) Ordinance, the regulations apply to properties where the maximum daily flow volume of wastewater produced is 10,000 gallons per day or less. If the maximum discharge amount is more than 10,000 gallons per day, then the method of treatment and dispersal must be approved by the appropriate California Regional Water Quality Control Board requirements. The second units that would be allowed by the Modified Project are anticipated to generate 121 gallons of wastewater per day, which is less than the maximum discharge amount of 10,000 gallons per day set by the County. The General Plan includes goals, policies, and actions to reduce water consumption and ensure water and wastewater facilities are expanded and/or constructed, as needed to meet the projected demand . The General Plan also addresses plann ed growth to ensure that the projected demand on utilities and infrastructure, including storm drain facilities, landfills, and energy consumption, are met . Although the total number of new units would be slightly increased under the M odified Project , ther e would be no new utilities -related impacts or increases to the severity of these impacts, and the overall impact would remain less than significant . As the M odified P roject would adhere to the vision by the General Plan and all land use and zoning designations, it would therefore neither cause new impacts in regard to provision of utility services, nor exacerbate any existing ones . Technical changes to the utilities and infrastructure analysis in the C ertified EIR are not required, and no new mitigation m easures are required. MANDATORY FINDINGS O F SIGNIFICANCE 2.2.18 Site Name Subsequent or Supplemental EIR Required No Additional Environmental Analysis Required Substantial Change in Project or Circumstances Resulting in New Significant Effects New Information Showing Greater Significant Effects than Previous EIR New Mitigation or Alternative to Reduce Significant Effect is Declined Minor Technical Changes or Additions No Change/ No Impact Would the project: a. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality X GENERAL PLAN 2020 FE IR ADDENDUM TOWN OF LOS GATOS ANALYSIS PLACEWORKS 2-35 Site Name Subsequent or Supplemental EIR Required No Additional Environmental Analysis Required Substantial Change in Project or Circumstances Resulting in New Significant Effects New Information Showing Greater Significant Effects than Previous EIR New Mitigation or Alternative to Reduce Significant Effect is Declined Minor Technical Changes or Additions No Change/ No Impact of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self - sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b. Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? (“Cumulatively considerable” means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable fut ure projects.) X c. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? X Based on the substantiations provided in the C ertified EIR and with implementation of the mitigation measures identified therein, the Town’s General Plan, as amended with the September 2012 Addendum for the Sustainability Plan and with the November 2013 Addendum for the Affordable Housing Overlay Zone s (AHOZ), would have a significant adverse effect on the environment, either individually or cumulatively, directly or indirectly with regards to Air Quality, Land Use and Planning, and Transportation/Traffic. The proposed Modified Project, including the Enhanced Second Unit Program, would result in additional residential development on sites that have been previously disturbed with urban uses. GENERAL PLAN 2020 FE IR ADDENDUM TOWN OF LOS GATOS ANALYSIS 2-36 NOVEMBER 2014 The Enhanced Second Unit Program would apply to scattered sites throughout the town and does not identify specific site locations ; therefore, future project s may be located within in areas of sensitive habitat or in close proximity to documented populations of endangered or other special -status species. However, the new second units allowed by the Modified Pro ject would be located on sites already developed with residential uses, and therefore would not be located on undisturbed sites with high habitat value. As with development anticipated under the Town’s General Plan, future development associated with the M odified P roject would not reduce the habitat of fish and wildlife species; cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self -sustaining levels; threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community; reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal; or eliminate examples of major periods of California history or prehistory. Additionally, as with development anticipated under the Town’s General Plan, future development associated with the M odified P roject would be consistent wi th the long -term goals of developing affordable housing in accordance with the Town’s General Plan. Although the M odified P roject would result in a n in crease in the amount of residential development allowed by the General Plan , the P roject would not exacer bate or create any new cumulative impacts because new development would limited to small residential structures that would be on previously developed sites scattered throughout the town . Implementation of the proposed Enhanced Second Unit Program would not result in impacts that are individually limited or cumulatively considerable . Cumulative impacts of the Modified Project would not be greater than those determined by the Certified EIR. This A ddendum review s the M odified P roject’s potential impacts to all of the environmental topics included in Appendix G of the CEQA Guidelines . The mitigation measures contained in the Certified EIR would remain sufficient to ensure that potential impacts remain less than significant and no new significant impacts would occur from implementation of the M odified P roject . The changes to the General Plan as part of the Housing Element Update evaluat ed in this A ddendum would not result in new significant impacts or affect the severity of the identified significant or significant and unavoidab le impacts of the General Plan as evaluated in the C ertified EIR . Therefore, the M odified P roject’s impacts to human beings, either directly or indirectly, would not be greater than those determined by the Certified EIR. APPENDIX A: CULTURAL RESOURCES L C A LSA ASSOCIATES INC. J A ` 15J PARK PLACE 510.236.6610 TEL PT. RICHMOND, CALIFORNIA 96801 510.236.4460 FAX MEMORANDUM BERKELEY FRESNO RIVERSIDE CARLSBAD IRVINE ROCKLIN FORT COLLINS PALM SPRINGS SAN LUIS OBISPO DATE. October 10, 2014 TO, Alexis Mena, LEED AP, Associate, P1aceWorks FROM, Andrew Pulcheon, Principal/Cultural Resources Manager, LSA Associates, Inc. SUBJECT. Cultural Resources Baseline Conditions Records Search Update for the Los Gatos 2020 General Plan Addendum EIR, Los Gatos, Santa Clara County, California (LSA Project #PLN1401) LSA Associates, Inc. (LSA), conducted background research toupdatethe cultural resources baseline conditions for the Los Gatos 2020 General Plan Addendum EIR. This effort supplements the original baseline conditions research conducted in 2008 -9 to prepare the cultural resources section of the Los Gatos 2020General Plan EIR. To prepare this update, LSA conducted a supplemental records search. No field review, eligibility evaluations, or consultation with stakeholders was conducted to prepare this memorandum. The tasks conducted for this review and the results are described below. RECORDS SEARCH A records search update of the General Plan area was conductedon September 25, 2014, at the Northwest Information Center (KWIC) of the CaliforniaHistorical Resources Information System, Sonoma State University, Rohnert Park. The NWIC, an affiliate of the State of California Office of Historic Preservation, is the official State repository of cultural resource records for Santa Clara County. As part of the records search, LSA also reviewed the following State inventories for cultural resources in and adjacent to the study area: California Inventory of Historic Resources (California Department of Parks and Recreation 1976); Five Views: An Ethnic Historic SiteSurvey for California (California Office of Historic Preservation 1988); California Points ofHistorical Interest (California Office of Historic Preservation 1992); California Historical Landmarks (California Office of Historic Preservation 1996); and Directory of Properties in the Historic Property Data File (California Office of Historic Preservation April 5, 2012 [updating the previous inventory of March 7, 20081). The directory includes the listings of the National Register of Historic Places, National Historic Landmarks, the California Register of Historical Resources, CaliforniaHistorical Landmarks, and California Points of Historical Interest. 10/10/14 (P1PLN1401Q014 UpdateUs Gatos GP Rural Resources Baseline Update.doc) LSA ASSOCIATES, INC. Results Six built - environmentcultural resources that were not included in the previous baseline conditions summary in 2009 were identified in the General Plan area. These resourcesare: P-43-001116, SanJose Substation B; P- 43- 001179, Limekiln kilns; P -43- 001916, Carhart House (APN 529 -10 -120); P- 43- 002640, Stetson- McCullagh House (381 Pennsylvania Avenue, APN 510 -41 -057); P -43- 002805, Residence (105 OldAdobe Road, APN 407 -14 -011); and P-43- 002806, Residence (115 Old Adobe Road, APN 407 -14 -013). The attached table presents this information in a format consistent with LSA's previous resource tables. 10/10114 (PAPLN140112014 UpdatelLos Gatos GP Qiltaral Resources Baseline Update.doc) d m a 7 d a) c N m N d U O f0 7 U c m a m G N O O N N O f0 N O J m c E E 0 U m d o' N m a' 7 m U U) c 0 v w c 0 U O d W D E m Z i N N .- O OO a monr N N s{ V zz Z z aaaa QaQ¢ mi6 v °oo mc0wm 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 i poi ci r' a v g vv aaaaa U U U UU zz z z z a Q Q Q a zz z z z 0 00 0 0 aaaaa UU U U U O O OOO N Ip N 9 D zz z z z d N 7 O 2 L m m N N C 7 U Y = C L m 0 m m E j U (nZZ m c Q a o o 0 c aa a OO m < 9 C Q a cc a D CL U o Q a N Z ZcM 0 i APPENDIX B: TRAFFIC ANALYSIS Traffic Analysis for the 2015 -2023 Housing Element Update prepared by Kimley -Horn andAssociates This appendix contains information about the transportation and circulationelement in the Town of Los Gatos relevant tothe modified 2014 Draft Housing Element. It provides an overview of the changes and updated evaluation since the adoption of the 2008 Housing Element. A. Cumulative Conditions Cumulative 2020 Traffic Operations Traffic operations, under 2020 traffic conditions, were evaluated at 38 intersections based on the prior General Plan published on March 10, 2010. Cumulative lane configurations and traffic controls are illustrated in Figure 1. The intersection of Winchester Boulevard and Albright Way (intersection 39) and the intersection of Winchester Boulevard and Courtyard Club entrance (intersection 40) were added on in supplemental analyses and are also shown in Figure 1. Traffic signals in the study area are located at allstudy intersections, with the exception of the Winchester Boulevard and Albright Way intersection, which is a side -street stop - controlled intersection. The intersection of Winchester Boulevard and Courtyard Club entrance is currently a side -street stop - controlled intersection with only an eastbound approach from the Courtyard Club entrance. This intersection will become signalized with the addition of the Albright development and add a westbound approach for access to the Albright development. The Cumulative 2020 volumeswere determined from the publishedGeneral Plan. From the General Plan, the long range travel demand model (the "model ") maintained by VTA was utilized to generatethe future growth. Since the previous update utilized the2005 (baseline) and 2030 horizon years, these analysis years and their output were retained for use in this 2014 HousingElement update. Usingthe model, volumes were determined by growing the existing volumes to obtain 2020 link volumes during the AM and PM peak hours, and future, balancedpeak -hour intersection turning movement volumes were projected based on existing trip patterns and existing and future link volumes. Year 2020 link volumes were then convertedto year 2020 peak hour intersection turning movement volumes to allow for direct comparison to theexisting condition turning movement volumes. Cumulative 2020 volumes were taken from the published 2020 General Plan and are illustrated in Figure 2. These volumes were evaluated at the study intersections. Results of the LOS analysis are presented in Table 1, along with the minimum standard for acceptable LOS and the planned 2020 traffic control at each intersection. According to evaluation results, all intersections satisfy operational standards TOWN OF LOS GATOS 2015 -2023 HOUSING ELEMENT UPDATE TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION TABLET CUMULATIVE 2020 LEVEL OFSERVICE SUMMARY Cumulative 2020 PM Int. lark Ave. and Hwy 17 SB Ramps Traffic Town D+ Delay C Delay Critical p Intersection Control Criteria LOS Seconds) LOS Seconds) Approach(es) I WinchesterBlvd. and Signal D C 30.8 D 43.8 SB, EB 19 Knowles Dr. Signal D D+ 38.5 C- 34.8 WE, SB 2 WinchesterBlvd. and Signal D B 17.3 C 23.9 SB 20 Hwy 85 NBOn Ramp Signal D C 25.8 B 15.8 EB 3 Winchester Blvd. and Signal D B- 18.7 B 14.5 NB, SB 21 Hwy 85 SB Off Ramp Signal D B 17.6 B 13.1 WE 4 WinchesterBlvd. and Signal D C 24.9 C 23.7 SB Lark Ave. 5 lark Ave. and Oka Rd. Signal D B- 19.5 B- 18.9 WE 6 lark Ave. and Hwy 17 SB Ramps Signal D D+ 37.3 C 31.3 W B, EB Garden Hill Dr. 7 lark Ave. and Hwy 17 Signal D B 17.0 B 17.9 WE, EB 19 NB Ramps Signal D D+ 38.5 C- 34.8 WE, SB 8 Los Gatos Blvd. and Signal DD+ 36.0 D+ 35.6 NB, SB, WE 20 Samaritan Dr. Signal D C 25.8 B 15.8 EB 9 Los Gatos Blvd. and Signal D D 40.1 D 47.5 NB, SB 21 Lark Ave. Signal D B 17.6 B 13.1 WE 10 Los Gatos Blvd. and Signal D C- 32.7 D+ 35.1 NB, SB Blossom Hill Rd. II LosGatos Blvd. and Signal D C- 32.9 C+ 22.6 NB Roberts Rd. - Shannon Rd. 12 Los Gatos Blvd. and Signal D B. 18.1 A 9.3 SB Nino Ave. 13 LosGatos Blvd, and Signal D C- 32.4 C 29.6 NB KennedyRd. - Caldwell Ave. 14 Loa Gatos Blvd. and Signal D C- 34.8 D 49.4 SB, EB Saratoga - LosGatos Rd. Is Saratoga - Las Gatos Rd. and Signal D C 25.9 C 31.0 EB University Ave. 16 W. Main St. and University Ave. Signal D C+ 20.7 C 25.S WE, SB 17 Santa Cruz Ave. and W. Main St. Signal D C 27.6 D+ 38.3 WE, NB 18 Santa Cruz Ave. and Saratoga - Signal D D 483 D 44.0 WE, EB Los Gatos Rd. Santa Cruz - Winchester Blvd. 19 and Blossom Hill - Mariposa Signal D D+ 38.5 C- 34.8 WE, SB Ave. 20 Blossom Hill Rd. and Signal D C 25.8 B 15.8 EB E. Roberts Rd. 21 Blossom Hill Rd. and Signal D B 17.6 B 13.1 WE Cherry Blossom Lane TOWN OF LOS GATOS 2015 -2023 HOUSING ELEMENT UPDATE TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION TABLE CUMULATIVE 2020 LEVEL OF SERVICE SUMMARY (CONTINUED) Cumulative 2020 AM PM Int. Winchester Blvd. and Traffic Town C Delay B Delay Critical Intersection Control Criteria LOS Seconds) LOS Seconds) Approach(es) 22Blossom Hill Rd. and Signal D B- 18.4 D 47.9 EB, WB Union Ave. 23 Blossom Hill Rd. and Signal DD 42.3 D- 54.4 EB, SB, WB Los Gatos - Almaden Rd. 24 WinchesterBlvd. and Daves Signal D B- 19.6B 16.6 SB Ave. 25 Lark Ave. and University Ave. Signal D B- 18.8 C 26.7 WB, EB 26 Pollard Rd. and More Ave. Signal D C 24.3 C+ 20.9 EB 27 Knowles Dr. and Dardanelli LaneSignal D B+ 11.3 B 14.3 WB, EB 28 Winchester Blvd. and Signal D C 26.0 B 16.8 NB, SB Wimbledon Dr. 29 Los Gatos Blvd. and Signal D C 31.5 D+ 36.8 NB, SB, EB Hwy SS SB Ramps 30 Los Gatos Blvd. and Signal D C+ 20.9 B 17.8 NB, SB Garden Gateway 31 Los Gatos Blvd. and Signal D B+ 10.9B 17.0 NB, SB LosGatos Village Square 32 Los Gatos Blvd. and Signal D C 26.2 C 26.0 NB, SB Almaden Rd. - Chiroo Dr. 33 Santa Cruz Ave. and Andrews St Signal D B 15.1 B 18.0 SB Blossom Hill Rd. and 34 University Ave. Signal D C+ 22.1 C 24.0 WB, EB Blossom Hill Rd. and 35 W. Roberts Rd. Signal D B 14.3 B- 19.9 WB, EB Blossom Hill Rd. and 36 Leigh Ave. Signal D B+ 10.8 C 24.1 WB, EB Blossom Hill Rd. and 37 Harwood Rd. Signal D B 16.1 B- 18.0 WB, EB 38 LosGatos - Almaden Rd. and Signal D B+ 11.9 B. 19.2 WB, EB National Ave. Winchester Boulevard and Albright Way Side Street 39 stop D Worst Approach Control 40 Winchester Boulevard and Signal D Courtyard Club Entrance Locations operating at unacceptablelevels are shown in BOLD. Intersections 39 and 40 were not analyzed in the original EIR published in 2010 TOWN OF LOS GATOS 2015 -2023 HOUSINGELEMENT UPDATE TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION B. Impact Discussion This section discusses the potential impacts of the modified 2014 Housing Element Update on transportation and circulation in the area. Thediscussion of potential project impacts is organized by and responds to each of the potential impacts identified in the Standards of Significance. The Town of Los Gatos (Town) is updating its Housing Element for the 2015 -2023 planning period. In this update, The Town was assigned 619 housingunits. To meet this housing number, the HousingElement is recommending mul- tiple strategies, of which include expanding the Second Unit Program to allowfor units on large non - conforming lots and hillside areas to be eligible for second units. More specifically, the Town is proposing to amend its mile to allow for non - conforming residential lots consisting of 10,000 square feet or greater to allow for construction of second units. After review of eligible residential lots, it was determined that a total of 135 lots would be eligible for second units and 20 percent of theowners would considerConstructing a second lot on their property. Therefore, it is as- sumed that 27 second units would be constructed as a result of this policy change. This traffic analysis will evaluate the traffic impacts of 27 additional housing units to the Town. 1. PotentialProject Impacts for 27 Additional HousingUnits This section addresses potentialtransportation impacts of the modified 2014 HousingElement Update. The 2014 Housing Element update proposes 27 additional housing units that would be distributed throughout Los Gatos wherethere were eligible lots. The number of project trips was Calculated based on ratesContained in the Institute of Transportation Engineer's (ITE) publication, Trip Generation'. The project was assumed to be the residential condominium /townhouse land use, due to the nature of the second dwelling units. The second dwelling units will be restricted to a maximum size of 750 square feet andone bedroom for attached units and a maximum of 900 square feet and two bedrooms for a detached unit. These unit sizes more closely resemble a townhouse orcondominium. In addition, if the units are rented out, they would be held to belowmarket rate standards, which typically have a lower vehicular trip generationrate. Based on these restrictions set Forth by the Town, the additional 27 units will be analyzed as a residential condominium /townhouse land use with Table 2 showingthe trip generation for the modified project: TABLE 2 TRIP GENERATION SUMMARY Time Period Land Use Trips In Trips Out Trips Total Daily Residential Condominium /Townhouse 103 103 206 27 Dwelling Units) AM Peak Residential Condominium /Townhouse 3 15 18 27 Dwelling Units) PM Peak Residential Condominium /Townhouse 14 7 21 27 Dwelling Units) It should be noted that the trip equation was used and not the average rate because the equation's coefficient of deter- mination (r) was high that indicates the data fits very well with the equation. The project is expected to only generate 18 trips in the AM peak hour and 21 trips in the PM peak hour. Trip Generation 9i° Edition, Institute of Transportation Engineers, Washington D.C., 2012. TOWN OF LOS GATOS 2015 -2023 HOUSING ELEMENT UPDATE TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION The ]orations of the secondary units were scattered throughout the Town of Los Gatos where residential units that fit the new criteria of non - conforming lots over 10,000 square feet or hillside lotswere located. The assumed trip distribution and trip assignment were consistent with the residential zones in the 2013 Los Gatos Housing Element Update. A Traffix model wasused to distribute the project trips basedon the trip distribution and assignment. This Traffix model was the same model used in the 2013 LosGatos HousingElement Update. After the project trips were determined, they were added to the General Plan 2020 volumes plus AffordableHousing Overlay Zoning (AHOZ) volumes. The 2013 AHOZ update included trip generation for five sites with modified den- sities. These five sites included: South Bay Development, Oak Rim and North Blossom Hill, Los Gatos Lodge (Parking Lot) — Site A, Los Gatos Lodge (Main Complex) — Site B, and Higgins Business Park. The AHOZ Update from these five projects resulted in a net increase in daily trips of 902 trips, a net decrease in AM peak trips of -13 trips, and a net increase in PMpeak trips of 84 trips for the new AHOZ. The 2013 AHOZ update also included adjustments to the North 40 project traffic generation assumed in the General Plan model. The North 40 project was evaluatedby Fehrand Peers in a separate study. Trip generation and trip dis- tribution information was obtained from the Fehr and Peers study and utilized in the AHOZ update. Since the General Plan model output assumed a higher trip generation and land use intensity for the current North 40 project, a net de- crease in trips was applied to the network. The 2013 AHOZ update included adjustments to the Albright project as well. The Albright project was approved for 48S,000 square feet of office/researchand development building. It was originally assumed that the Albright project would be 550,000 square feet. The project will also remove ten existing buildings totaling 250,000 square feet, for a net new 235,000 square feet of office/research and development building. The General Plan 2020 volumeswerethen compared to the General Plan plus AHOZ plus Project volumes to deter- mine if there were any significantimpacts from the modified project. Each study intersection was analyzed in Traffix utilizing the Operations Method from the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) methodology, consistent with the previous analysis. The updated 2020 General Plan with the 2013 AHOZ and the modified 2014HousingElement Update turning movement volumeswere evaluated at the study intersections and can be seen in Figure 3. Results of the LOS analysis are presented in Table 3, along with the minimum standard for acceptable LOS and the planned 2020 traffic control at each intersection. As shown in Table 3. all study intersections operate acceptably (at LOS D or better ) under 2020 General Plan Plus 2013 AHOZ Plus 2014 Housing Element Update conditions. TOWN OF LOS GATOS 2015 -2023 HOUSING ELEMENT UPDATE TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION TABLE CUMULATIVE 2020 +2013 AHOZ+ 2014 HOUSING ELEMENT UPDATE LEVEL OF SERVICE SUMMARY Cumulative 2020 + 2013 AHOZ + 2014 Housing Element PM Int. Lark Ave. and Hwy 17 SB Ramps Traffic Town C Delay p C Delay A Critical Intersection Control Criteria LOS SEC) Delay LOS Sec) Delay Approach(es) I Winchester Blvd. and Signal D C 25.8 5.0 C- 35.0 8.8 SB, EB 19 Knowles Dr. Signal D D 41.3 2.8 D+ 35.9 1.1 WB, SB 2 Winchester Blvd. and Signal D B 16.4 0.9 C+ 21.4 2.5 SB 20 Hwy 85 NB On Ramp Signal D C 27.6 1.8 B- 19.8 4.0 EB 3 Winchester Blvd. and Signal D B 16.5 2.2 B 12.5 2.0 NB, SB 21 Hwy 85 SB Off Ramp Signal D C+ 22.5 4.9 B 17.1 4.0 WB 4Winchester Blvd. and Signal D C 24.1 0.8 C 24.0 0.3 SB Lark Ave. 5 Lark Ave. and Oka Rd. Signal D B- 19.0 -0.5 B 17.0 -1.9 WB 6 Lark Ave. and Hwy 17 SB RampsSignal D C 26.3 11.0 C 30.9 0.4 WB, EB Garden Hill Dr. 7 Lark Ave. and Hwy 17 Signal D B- 19.5 2.5 B 16.4 1.5 WB, EB 19 NB Ramps Signal D D 41.3 2.8 D+ 35.9 1.1 WB, SB 8 Los Gatos Blvd. and Signal D C 30.06.0 D 46.2 10.6 NB, SB, WB 20 Samaritan Dr. Signal D C 27.6 1.8 B- 19.8 4.0 EB 9Los Gatos Blvd. and Signal D D+ 38.6 1.5 C- 34.7 12.8 NB, SB 21 Lark Ave. Signal D C+ 22.5 4.9 B 17.1 4.0 WB 10 Los Gatos Blvd. and Signal DD+ 35.6 2.9 C- 33.1 2.0 NB, SB Blossom Hill Rd. 11 Los Gatos Blvd. and Signal D C- 32.6 0.3 C 24.5 1.9 NB Roberts Rd. - Shannon Rd. 12 Los Gatos Blvd. and Signal D C 23.4 5.3 B- 19.8 10.5 SB Nino Ave. 13 Los Gatos Blvd. and Signal DC- 32.4 0.0 C 29.7 0.1 NB Kennedy Rd. - Caldwell Ave. 14 LOS Gatos Blvd. and Signal D D+ 36.2 1.4 D- 51.6 2.2 SB, EB Saratoga - Los Gatos Rd 15 Saratoga - LosGatosRd. and Signal D C 30.2 4.3 D 47.4 16.4 EB University Ave. 16 W. Main St. and University Ave. Signal D C+ 20.70.0 C 26.3 0.8 WB, SB 17 Santa Cruz Ave. and W. Main St. Signal D C 27.0 -0.6 C 26.2 .12.1 WB, NB 18 Santa Cru.. Ave. and Saratoga - Signal D D 48.6 0.1 D 42.7 1.3 WB, EB Los Gatos Rd. Santa Cruz- Winchester Blvd. 19 and Blossom Hill - Mariposa Signal D D 41.3 2.8 D+ 35.9 1.1 WB, SB Ave. 20 Blossom Hill Rd. and Signal D C 27.6 1.8 B- 19.8 4.0 EB E. Roberts Rd. 21 Blossom Hill Rd. and Signal D C+ 22.5 4.9 B 17.1 4.0 WB Cherry Blossom Lane TOWN OF LOS GATOS 2015 -2023 HOUSING ELEMENT UPDATE TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION TABLE CUMULATIVE 2020 +2013 AHOZ+ 2014 HOUSINGELEMENT UPDATE LEVELOF SERVICE SUMMARY Cumulative 2020 + 2013 AHOZ + 2014 Housing Element 25 Lark Ave. and University Ave. Signal D C 27.3 8.5 C 28.5 1.8 WE, EB 26 Pollard Rd. and More Ave. Signal D C+ 20.8 -3.S C 25.7 4.8 EB 27 Knowles Dr. and Dardanelli Lane Signal D B+ AM 1.0 B PM 1.6 WB, EB Int. Winchester Blvd. and Wimbledon Dr. Traffic Town B Delay A B Delay p Critical Intersection Control Criteria LOS Sec) Delay LOS Sec) Delay Approach(es) 22 Blossom Hill Rd. and Signal D B 17.60.8 D 43.0 4.9 EB, WE 31 Union Ave. Signal D B+ 11.8 0.9 B 14.9 2.1 NB, SB 23 Blossom Hill Rd. and LosGatos - Almaden Rd. Signal D C 30.3 12.0 D 49.8 4.6 EB, SB, WB 24 Winchester Blvd. and Daves Signal D C 24.1 4.S B- 19.8 3.2 SB 34 Ave. Signal D C 28.0 5.9 C- 32.5 8.5 WB, EB 25 Lark Ave. and University Ave. Signal D C 27.3 8.5 C 28.5 1.8 WE, EB 26 Pollard Rd. and More Ave. Signal D C+ 20.8 -3.S C 25.7 4.8 EB 27 Knowles Dr. and Dardanelli Lane Signal D B+ 10.3 1.0 B 12.7 1.6 WB, EB 28 WinchesterBlvd. and Wimbledon Dr. Signal D B 16.5 9.5 B 16.6 0.2 NB, SB 29 LosGatos Blvd. and Hwy 85 SB Ramps Signal m D B- 19.8 11.7 C 29.0 7.8 NB, SB, EB 30 LosGatos Blvd. and Garden Gateway Signal D B- 18.9 2.0B- 19.1 1.3 NB, SB 31 LosGatos Blvd. and Las Gatos Village Square Signal D B+ 11.8 0.9 B 14.9 2.1 NB, SB 32 Los Gatos Blvd. and Almaden Rd. - Ch rco Dr. Signal D C 25.0 1.2 C 23.8 2.2 NB, SB 33 Santa Cruz Ave. and Andrews St Signal D B 13.9 1.2 B 16.4 1.6 SB 34 Blossom Hill Rd. and University Ave. Signal D C 28.0 5.9 C- 32.5 8.5 WB, EB 3S Blossom Hill Rd. and W. Roberts Rd. Signal D B 14.70.4 B- 19.4 0.5 WB, EB 36 Blossom Hill Rd. and Leigh Ave. Signal D B 13.0 2.2 B- 19.7 4.4 WB, EB 37 Blossom Hill Rd. and Signal D B 14.4 1.7 B- 18.00.0 WB, EB Harwood Rd. 38 LosGatos - AlmadenRd. and Signal D B 13.5 1.6 B 15.7 3.S WB, EB National Ave. Winchester Boulevard and Side Street A 0.0 A 0.3 39 Albright Way Stop P WB- Worst Approach Control C 15.5 B 13.5 40 Winchester Boulevard and Signal D C 2S.1 C 26.0 NB Courtyard Club Entrance Locations operating at unacceptable levels are shown in BOLD. TOWN OF LOS GATOS 2015 -2023 HOUSING ELEMENT UPDATE TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION The 2020 General Plan includes a number of policies to address future impacts to the capacity of the roadway system. Transportation Goal TRA -1 and Policy TRA -1.1 require that development not exceed transportation capacity and to develop transportation systems that meet current and future needs of residents and businesses. Policy TRA -3.3 calls for an evaluation of all new developments to ensure that they are in Compliance with the Town's LOS intersection policy; Policy TRA -3.4 states that new projects shall not causean intersection at LOS of Level A, B, or C to drop more than onelevel and an intersection at LOS D or below to drop at all; and Policy TRA -3.5 states that if a new project causes an intersection LOS to drop more than one level from LevelA, B, or C or to drop at all from Level D or below, the project shall mitigate traffic so that the LOS will remain at an acceptable level. In addition, ActionTRA -3.1 will implement thelocal roadway improvements listed in Section E.2 and E.3 of Transportation Element of the 2020 General Plan in the Capital Improvements Program (CIP). With the implementation of these improvements, allstudy intersections operate at LOS D or better. Right -of -way is currently owned by the Town at some of the locations proposed for improvement; however, other locations would require right - of-wayacquisition andsome specific locations may require removal of parking or otherexisting roadway features to adequately design the proposed improvement. Overall, the proposedroadway and intersectionimprovements called for in the2020 General Plan would be Constructed within an area that is already utilized for existing roadway features. These improvements would not require development of undeveloped land and therefore wouldnot be expected to have significant environmental impacts. However, an appropriate level of project - specific environmental review would be required at the time each improvement is designed and approved.