Loading...
Off-leash Dog Park StatusS OS GATO DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: MEETING DATE: 3/19/12 COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT ITEM NO: MARCH 12, 2012 MAYOR AND TOWN COUNCIL GREG LARSON, TOWN MANAGER OFF -LEASH DOG PARK STATUS A. ACCEPT STAFF REPORT ON THE STATUS OF POTENTIAL DOG OFF- LEASH AREAS IN TOWN PARKS. B. DIRECT STAFF TO EVALUATE OPTIONS FOR A DOG OFF -LEASH PILOT PROGRAM AND CONDUCT A PUBLIC INPUT PROCESS. C. DIRECT STAFF TO PROVIDE AN IMPLEMENTATION PLAN FOR A DOG OFF -LEASH PILOT PROGRAM TO COUNCIL NO LATER THAN JUNE 4, 2012. RECOMMENDATION 1. Accept staff report on the status of potential dog off -leash areas in Town Parks. 2. Direct staff to evaluate options for a dog off -leash pilot program and conduct a public input process. 3. Direct staff to provide an implementation plan for a dog off -leash pilot program to Council no later than June 4, 2012. Ia[flmi well) ►1" The Town of Los Gatos operates fourteen heavily programmed and utilized parks. These parks offer a wide array of amenities and recreational opportunities, and provide facilities for local sports leagues and the Los Gatos - Saratoga Recreation Department. The Town of Los Gatos Municipal Code states that all dogs in a park must be on leash and under control of their owner at all times. The Town currently does not provide off -leash dog facilities at any park. Due to the high usage of parks and limited land, but also recognizing the need for an off -leash dog area, the Town contributed resources to the Santa Clara County Parks Department for the construction of a fenced off -leash dog park. This park is located in Campbell within the Los Gatos Creek County Park, and is approximately five miles from downtown Los Gatos. There are additional off -leash dog parks also located in San Jose and other nearby cities. PREPARED BY : TODD CAPURSO Director of Parks and Public Works Reviewed by: Town Manager Town Attorney N:\PPw\MANAGEMENT\COUNCIL \COUNCIL REPORTS\2012 ReportAMamh 19 \Off- leash _Council Report_V3.Final.docx PAGE 2 MARCH 12, 2012 MAYOR AND TOWN COUNCIL SUBJECT: OFF -LEASH DOG PARK STATUS BACKGROUND (cont'd) In recent years, several residents have begun utilizing Town parks, specifically Bachman, Live Oak Manor and La Rinconada, as unofficial off -leash dog areas, and many members of the community have requested that this issue be officially addressed by the Town. In October 2009, the issue was brought forward to the Parks Commission, and staff proposed exploring and evaluating opportunities to implement a pilot program. The Parks Commission voted against this, citing safety concerns and potential use conflicts in parks. More recently, informal groups of dog owners and park users have re- initiated this topic. At the February 6, 2012 Town Council meeting, the Council requested that the topic of off -leash dog areas be brought to Council for discussion by the end of March. On February 7, 2012, the Parks Commission directed Town staff to prepare a proposal regarding an implementation plan for evaluating an off -leash dog pilot program. Following these meetings, staff contacted other local municipalities that have experience with off -leash dog programs, in an effort to gather additional information about their programs and experience with off -leash facilities. After speaking with staff in municipalities similar to Los Gatos in terms of population, size, and environment, Town staff found that several of them have successfully addressed this issue. These cities include, but are not limited to: Burlingame, Cupertino, San Bruno, San Carlos, San Mateo, and Santa Cruz. Several of these cities are currently testing a variety of off -leash options, including: off -leash hours in non - fenced areas of parks, off -leash hours within the boundaries of athletic fields, and portable fencing to surround off -leash areas during off -leash hours. Other cities have decided instead to provide residents with information on nearby off -leash areas as an alternative to creating their own. Feedback from these agencies indicates that fenced implementations have proven to concentrate negative turf impact to specific areas rendering them unusable for other recreational activities; they have also proven to be resource intensive. However, the concept of off -leash hours without fencing provides the flexibility to periodically alter the off -leash areas when turf renovation activities become necessary. These non - fenced areas also remain available for recreational programming when off -leash hours are not in effect. DISCUSSION Staff originally identified six parks that would be of sufficient size to accommodate an off -leash dog area. However, after factoring in use patterns and recreational programming demands, only four of the six have been identified as suitable for further consideration: Bachman, Belgatos, La Rinconada, and Live Oak Manor. After gathering some initial public input earlier this year, staff has been researching use patterns at these four sites. There appears to be a demonstrated demand at three of the parks (all except Belgatos) that warrants farther consideration. PAGE MARCH 12, 2012 MAYOR AND TOWN COUNCIL SUBJECT: OFF -LEASH DOG PARK STATUS DISCUSSION (cont'd) Prior to proposing or implementing significant changes in park use, staff works to ensure the adjacent neighborhood is engaged in a community input process, and that all existing user groups are invited to participate. As part of the proposed community input process, neighborhood residents and dog- owners would be invited to participate in order to ensure optimal use of limited park space and neighborhood compatibility. In order to fully evaluate the impacts and neighborhood acceptance of implementing off -leash areas in each of the three parks, staff recommends conducting a community meeting, inviting all residents within 300 feet of each park and all interested dog- owners. Residents would be notified by mail, while dog- owners and other park users would be notified through public postings in the parks. Through this community input process, staff would gather input that would be used to evaluate how off -leash hours could be proposed and implemented at each of the three park sites in a manner that optimizes park usage. It is likely that the off -leash program would be limited to specific times of day and potentially to certain days of the week. Provided that there is sufficient community support, staff would recommend the implementation of a pilot program that would allow for the site(s) to be monitored for a period of six to twelve months to evaluate seasonal impacts, long -term maintenance requirements, and neighborhood impacts. In proposing potential pilot program options, staff will recommend that any implementation be resource neutral, utilizing self - policing and volunteer maintenance efforts as much as possible. Staff would also install signage which would notify park users of off -leash hours and rules. Staff proposes conducting the community meeting in mid -April and using the input and results to formulate a proposal that would be presented to the Parks Commission in mid -May. Based on Commission feedback, the proposal may be further refined before it is presented to Council in June. Staffs proposed timeline is as follows: Proposed Schedule: • March 19, 2012 — Status report to Council. • Mid -April — Conduct Community Meeting inviting user - groups /neighbors. • Mid-May— Special Parks Commission Meeting to consider staff recommendations. • June 4, 2012 — Staff report to Council with a recommended implementation plan. CONCLUSION Staff recommends that the Town Council accept this staff report on the status of potential dog off -leash accommodations in Town parks. It is also recommended that the Town Council direct staff to evaluate options for a dog off -leash pilot program and conduct a public input process, including at least one community meeting. It is further recommended that the Town Council PAGE MARCH 12, 2012 MAYOR AND TOWN COUNCIL SUBJECT: OFF -LEASH DOG PARK STATUS CONCLUSION cont'd : direct staff to provide an implementation plan for a dog off -leash pilot program to Council no later than June 4, 2012. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT This action is not a project as defined under CEQA, and no further action is required. FISCAL IMPACT There is no fiscal impact to the Town to accept the recommendations included in this report, other than reallocating existing staff time and attention to this project rather than duties and assignments. However, the implementation of dog off -leash areas may generate the need for additional resources to install park modifications, such as barriers and/or signage, and/or increased education and enforcement. Off -leash areas or hours may also impact park maintenance requirements by increasing the frequency and intensity of park use. Once identified, these potential impacts will be addressed and brought forward to Council on June 4, 2012 as part of the recommended implementation plan. Attachments 1. Draft Parks Commission Meeting Minutes - February 7, 2012 2. Email dated March 8, 2012 from Sheila Bannan, 118 Massol Avenue, Los Gatos Attachment 1 Parks Commission Minutes TowN OF Los GATOS February 7, 2012 RJ BRYANT SERVICE CENTER 41 MILES AVENUE Los GATos, CA 95031 I. II. III. TOWN OF LOS GATOS PARKS COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING RJ BRYANT SERVICE CENTER 41 MILES AVENUE, LOS GATOS 6:00 PM REGULAR MEETING TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 7, 2012 The February 7 Agenda was posted Elie Public on January 31, 2012. The Parks Commission Regular Meeting Was called to order at- 6:07 p.m. by Chair Rob Rennie = °i ROLL CALL Present -Chair Rob Rennie, Vice Chair Jon I✓ Commissioner Brant Coremison, Commissioner Kareri=3Jeloumi, Commissioner Sandy Gordoi, Commissioner Barbara Holden, Commissioner Edward Scott and Student CoYnnissioner Haserot Staff: Todd Capurso, Parks and Public Works Director ,Christy Wolter, Parks and Facilities Superintendent X_ -in Rohani, Town Engineer Da v6 Gray, Parks Service Officer Amaer Pinkerton, Parks Service Officer Jason Erickson, Parks and Public Works Intern Commissioner Corenson asked if there was any further information regarding V. Commission Matters — E. Participation in Downtown Banner Art Selection Process — Januarv Director Capurso stated that he has not heard any further information from the Town Manager's office and will include this item on the agenda for the April 3, 2012 Parks Commission meeting. N: MACOMMISSIONS & COMMMEESTarks Commission\MTNOTES\2012\DRAFT Feb712 Minutes.docx PAGE 1 Parks Commission Minutes February 7, 2012 Chair Rennie asked the Parks Commission if there were any further questions or changes to the minutes. There were no further questions or changes to the minutes. MOTION: Motion made by Commissioner Gordon to approve the December 6, 2011 Regular Meeting Minutes. Seconded by Commissioner Corenson. VOTE: Motion carried unanimously. IV. COMMUNICATIONS (Three minute time limit per speaker for subjects A. Verbal °�a n3y Speaker Thomas Cook spoke on the upcoming project for improvements along Blossom Hill Road that would include new Sidewalks and bike lanes making it safer for pedestrians and bicyclists. :.: Speaker Cook expressed that he just learned last week that the first step +: of that process vas the removal of trees at Blossom Hill Park and is not pleased with thig�l decisO , Speaker Cook doesn't want to stand in the way of progress, ut does wAbUo understand the process and if there are 4 f other options for preserving some of the., park's natural beauty. Chair Rennie asked s Commissioners if they had any questions for Speaker Cook. L, � ,>.The following Parks Commissioners had questions for Speaker Cook: Coi "ssioner Corenson: U3 What are, the cross - streets of this area? Speaker Cook responded the cross streets are Blossom Hill Road and Cherry Blossom where the little Teaeue field is located. Gordon: What is the replacement plan for vegetation in that area? Director Capurso responded the replacement plan is based on the canopy size per the Town Code, i.e. 2 — 24" box trees or 1 — 36" box tree. Director Capurso stated that the Town has already made the commitment that for every tree removed, a 48" box tree would be planted, which is a higher replacement than as mandated by the Town Code. Director Capurso further stated that staff is searching for other mitigation plans, which also include the option of relocating the trees. N: IPPYACOMMISSIONS & COMMITrEES\Parks CommissionVv1NUCES\2012\DRAFT Feb712 Minutes.doex PAGE 2 Parks Commission Minutes Commissioner Holden: February 7, 2012 Would leaving them in their current location lead to death? Director Capurso stated that the trees planted too close to the proximity of the construction would cause damage and death to the trees within two years. Director Capurso stated that the new trees would not be planted in the same location. Director Capurso further stated that staff is looking at what's best for the Safe Routes to School Project moving forward 1) work around the trees and plant them two years later or 2) take the issue on now, address it and let the re- vegetation start earlier. Commissioner Gordon: Asked Speaker Cook if question; that there is a] vegetation with whatever.: t Capurso reported answered his where_ > ^it is feasible to replace the with the :conditions at hand. Speaker Cook commen expressed his confusion. taken out; then - why not b Chair Rennie stated this subject because that until Speaker .0 __ tjtat no aefion can be )ner Gordon's explanation and stated that if the five trees are >r by putting ten trees along it. the Park§ %Ornmission can't take any action on not on the agentta. Director Capurso also stated hasfiled a writfe regarding this subject n, including . kspecrif meeting called by the Parks Based on what's been described, what's the position of the Parks Commission and how are we able to help? Director Capurso stated that a final designf A his project was approved by the Town Council; it went out for bid, a contract was awarded and the work has begun. Director Capurso stated that although it's possible to change contractual relationships it can only be done by the Town Council. Director Capurso further stated that depending on the result of an appeal, it may or may not have to back to Town Council. Director Capurso stated that the appeal process for publicly owned trees ends with the Parks Commission and typically do not go to the Town Council. Director Capurso stated that if there is conflict with an appeal and there was already an award by the Town Council, then it would be brought back to Town Council. N:V'PW\COMMISSIONS & COMMITTEESTarks CommissionV4R\TUTES\2012\DRAFT Feb712 Minutes.docx PAGE 3 Parks Commission Minutes Commissioner Gordon: February 7, 2012 Whom are you representing? Your community, neighbors? Speaker Cook stated that he is not representing anybody and is speaking for himself and family. Commissioner Corenson: Are these the types of projects that should've gone through the Parks Commission process prior to the determination of the Town Council? Director Capurso stated that the design phase typically does not go through a commission on any public project. Director Capurso stated that the direction for this project came directly from the Town Council at 4hich point staff goes out and executes the process. Commissioner Lambertis -, Commented that he understands Speaker Cook's situation and stated that as residents public of the Town, we should be responsible to see what the TownCoutil, Commiss ns., and Committees are doing and whether rt affecsus peroaIl or notes Speaker Cook stated that he respects Commissro Lambert's �oslhon but feels that his statement is wrong. ,Speaker Cook salthat the proct has been communicated effectively and that these as'no discuibn of the five trees being taken out. Speaker Cook's w e added that her concern is that today is the day to file the appeal; howevery ey do not want to do it, but if that is the only I way the process will all em to be heard by the Parks Commission, they are prepared to do it. Commissioner Lambert reiterated that if a decision was made outside of a partrcula> forum then the appeal process is the right thing to do. Deloumi: ;the difference between the sports park project and this project? eke we able to see the design for the sports park design and not this and not be able to give input? Director Capurso responded that technically the Parks Commission didn't see the design for sports park, but did see the sports park master plan and conceptual design. Director Capurso stated that the Town Council and Commissions normally see conceptual designs and typically do not review the detailed construction drawings. Director Capurso indicated that the master plan for Blossom Hill Park was done in 2010; feedback was used and incorporated into the design similar to what was just done for Live Oak Park Manor. N:WWOMMISSIONS & COMMITTEESTarks Commission\MIN=S\2012\DRAFT Feb712 Minutmdocx PAGE 4 Parks Commission Minutes Commissioner Scott: February 7, 2012 Does the Parks Commission have anything to decide on non - agendized items such as those that fall under verbal communications? Chair Rennie stated that the Parks Commission is not deciding on anything but listening to speaker comments. Commissioner Scott stated that maybe the best path for the Cooks would be to file an appeal if they want any action taken. Chair Rennie asked the Parks Co, ssion if there are any further comments or discussion on this itemA H Commissioner Scott expressed bus concerns on notification to the residents and the public for projects in Tort_, Director Capurso stated that the Town does have apolicy on public note fcation. Commissioner Deloumi expressed that moving MW rd she would like to have further discussion regarding -°1) process of where the Parks Commission rs involved, 2) communication to the comm"u my in relation M &- to parks proleefs and 3) summary of key items that the public would want to know about ,%g& y Chair.-Rennie stated�that the Park process will be added to the next meeting agenda After much discussion Speaker Cook and the Parks Commission, Chair Rennie stated thaf- "o_ action will be taken on this matter .unless an appeal is filed and�ctoed out the verbal communications portion of the meeting. Chair Rennie moved on to the next item on the agenda. v B. Written. None V. A. Chair Rennie welcomed and introduced newly appointed Parks Commissioner Edward Scott. Chair Rennie also announced that the Parks Commission is still in need of an additional Student Commissioner and the Town will be recruiting in May 2012. NAPPw\COMMISSIONS & COMWITEESTuks Commission\MIl40TES\2012\DRAFT Feb712 Minutes.docx PAGE 5 Parks Commission Minutes B. Dogs off Leash February 7, 2012 Director Capurso gave a summary to the Parks Commission and the public in attendance regarding the current situation in regards to dogs off leash in the Town. Director Capurso stated that this issue is being brought back to the Town Council in March 2012 for a status update on a dogs off leash program. Director Capurso stated that staff would like to hear from those attending this meeting on what could be proposed not only for dog owners, but for park users as well. Director Capurso stated that staff is looking for a potential pilot program where there are off leash hours at particular parks in Town. }';,p Director Capurso contirt4,6 to state that this issue was brought before the Parks Commission in`20O9. Director Capurso stated that the Parks Commission made no remmendation to implement a dogs off leash program in 2009. Director Capurso stated that he wants to hear the opinions of those who filled out speaker cards. DrrectonCapurso stated that staff would compile information from all interested parties and include that report to the To.n Council in March. , " k 4 Ghau Rennie stated that this portion of the meeting will be run much like a Town CARE Meeting. Chart Rennie opened up the floor to the Parks Commissioners to ask staff Asked what's changed since 2009? Director Capurso stated that since 2009 there's been a substantial amount turnover of parks commissioners and that dogs off leash is still an unresolved issued with the Town. Director Capurso stated that this was never documented in the General Plan before, but it is now and now there is more community interest. Commissioner Holden: If there was a dogs off leash program and a dog bit a child, who is liable? Director Capurso stated that he can't answer that question until something is proposed. Director Capurso stated that this type of question can't be addressed until a program is actually implemented. N THACOMMISSIONS & COMMITTEES\Parks Commission\MUq TIES\2012\DRAFP Feb712 Minutmdoex PAGE 6 Parks Commission Minutes Commissioner Gordon: February 7, 2012 What's the short list of likely parks that this makes sense? Director Capurso stated that he would like to defer from an answer until he hears from the speakers. Commissioner Corenson: Is a motion going to be asked for tonight? Director Capurso stated, at the very least, staff is looking for input and if the Parks Commission chooses to make a motion that is at the discretion of the commissioners. Commissioner Scott: Is there a standard of care fro stated that there is implementz municipalities, i.e. San-Carlos districts along beaches, Commissioner Scott stated experiences ofwthose other unfenced areas. Z11 w other municipalities? Director Capurso ion of this nature that is being seen in other Santa Cruz and larger park and open space that -it would be helpful to have the ruiucipalities in connection with those Commissioner Deloumi: A, Stated there is. a newspap repo�tmg that the city of San Carlos is considering implement g=a pilot program allowing dogs off leash for several hours a day at de i ated parks. Commissioner Deloumi stated ,that she sari send_the article ro the commissioners should they want to "review it. Commissioner Moumi stated that the Town should consider r Corenson: What's thelatest in regards to the complaints from dogs off leash at P rissy Tield? Director Capurso has no information regarding Commissioner Corenson's inquiry. Commission Scott stated that he is som4hat familiar with that and the whole reason Crissy Field was redone a few years ago was to create a habitat for birds that were migrating through the area. Commissioner Scott said the off leash dogs were creating an issue with the habitat based on articles that he read. Commissioner Corenson asked if he knew if they restricted the dogs. Commissioner Scott replied the park follows NP S rules and regulations. Commissioner Deloumi: Stated there are a lot of options to be considered when implementing a pilot program and the Parks Commission should investigate them. NAPPVACOMMISSIONS & CONUV[=ES\Pmks Commisslon\MINUTES\2012\DRAFT Feb712 Minutes.docx PAGE 7 Parks Commission Minutes February 7, 2012 Chair Rennie moved on to the public portion of the Parks Commission meeting and stated that the floor will be opened up for questions and discussion after hearing from those who have submitted a speaker card on this subject. The following speakers addressed the Parks Commission in regards to dogs off leash: Speaker Victor Faral: Speaker Faral stated that he used the-d& park in Campbell even though he had to pay the $5 to $6 parking fee. Speaker Faral stated that subsequently he discovered Live- 960&anor where he could bring his dog. Speaker Faral stated thatIiMspot. been averse to letting his dog off leash to run around and play. Speaker;Faral stated, however, that in „a the last year and half there has been an mcreasg dogs in this park early in the morning and late in the afternoon. y Speaker Faral stated the dog reflects the owner and has had only one experience where his dog was attacked. Speaker Faral sfated that he and fellow nelghbor'Dick Foster police the area and would like to know what can be done as co cerned citizens to assist in the implementation of a dogs off leash prograin, "alsotrot to have to go another city, such as Campbell, to walk Y�u dogs2 Chair Rennie asked tll�`P ks Conili s oners if they had any questions for Speaker Faral. d�N ,The following Parks Comintssioners had questions for Speaker Faral: Corenson: How do' :you propose citizens to control their dogs while off leash? Speakef,Faral stated that with everything that is seen, all these dogs are properlyehaved, except for Jack Terriers. Speaker Faral stated that you can see 410 are the responsible dog owners in the park. would like to see the Town assert the responsibility of the dog owner. Commissioner Gordon asked if Speaker Faral was suggesting that if there were posted rules of engagement in any designated area, where there would be a dog off leash, that it would be responsibility of the owner's and their dogs to be mindful of that. Speaker Faral stated yes. Commissioner Delon": NdP WOMMISSIONS & COMMnTEESTarks CommisslonVMI1 Feb712 Minutes.dom PAGE 9 Parks Commission Minutes February 7, 2012 With the community policing the areas will it work and how do you see this working if there is no structure behind it? Speaker Faral stated that if this was an experiment, and the dog owners took the responsibility of monitoring those rules posted in the park, we would report any improper behavior by dogs and/or their owners to the Park Service Officer or to whomever would be responsible in taking corrective action. Commissioner Scott: Do you know to whom the $6 parking fee goes? Speaker Faral stated that the parking fee goes to Santa Clara County. Is the area fenced in for dogs Service Officer Gray stated y to Santa Clara County? Park e facility. Director Capurso st; constructed by Santa Gatos. Director Cal specific issue but to p scheme, i.e. usit Speaker Faral a chip in them. be fla Wed for intent of the fenced facility for dogs was ty for usage for both Campbell and Los ued that it wasn't constructed to solve a tion er aral if he was adverse to a licensing :a ,,,_: ng as a dog has a certain tag on it. rg owners have their pets registered with stated --: dNf the dogs are tagged and a vice Offie f then the dog and its owner Director �Capurso interjected and stated that there are a lot of lruplemtatioa a quest ons, being asked and these questions are all - =being aske7from the,first, speaker when there are others waiting to be heard_on f Asubject matter as well. Director Capurso suggested the Parks Commissron.movc on to the next speaker. Speaker Isabella Rennie: Speaker Rennie wanted to address one of the themes she's heard this evening and that is giving the residents the benefit of the doubt with dogs off leash, and that owners will be responsible for their dogs. Speaker Rennie stated that the residents of Bachman Park discussed different options of how dogs off leash could be addressed in a positive way. Speaker Rennie stated that the residents came up with a pilot program that involves implementing a permit process and designated areas where dogs would have off leash hours. Speaker Rennie continued that these designated areas would be posted with signs for specified hours and by permit only. Speaker Rennie stated that the people in the community are the best watch guards to police the parks to maintain peace and quiet in the N:\PPW\COMMISSIONS & COMMu7EES\Parks Commission\NIINOTEM20120RAFT F6712 Minutes.doex PAGE 9 Parks Commission Minutes February 7, 2012 neighborhood. Speaker Rennie lastly stated that it is the people who live in the neighborhood, that keep the parks safe. Chair Rennie asked the Parks Commissioners if they had any questions for Speaker Rennie. There were no further questions for Speaker Rennie. Speaker Beth Jendricks: Speaker Jendricks was no longer present but Speaker Linda S. Rodriguez spoke on her behalf, which entailed a letter written by Speaker Jendricks. Speaker Rodriguez read the letter,V bi"Speaker Jendricks to the Parks Commission. The letter included thedllowing statement: "Request that the committee consider cn Bachman Park and other Los Gatos Parks to legally` allow the use''gf = = a designated area of approximately 200 x 200 for the purpose of -os Gatos residents to socialize with their dogs off leash for one hour, Sunday through Saturday evening, summer hours 5 :00 P.M. to 6 00`p.m. and winter hours 4 :30 p M.-.Jo 5 :30 p.m. It would be open o" to Los Gatos }' eW residents, verified by a driver's license or student identification. Our mplet�vay for neighbors to gather with their dogs. od wdF , 'I! allow all other park users to be functional oavoid fht time, they can plan to use the park Town needs a i's'i Setting a time pji so if they want accordingly. It will i implemented now as in resources, but could be Speaker Rodriguez state l pAhat they've had their dogs off leash in Bachman Park for several�y_ears now and the residents are all very `respectful and cognizant of th-6 children playing at the end of the park. Speaker Rodriguez continued to state that they keep their dogs at one end of the park, and when people come by on the sidewalks, that they move their dgg of the way. Speaker Rodriguez also stated that in many cases people from the playground bring their kids down to where they're at to see their dogs. Speaker Rodriguez stated that she's unsure of how many complaints there have been for Bachman Park, but there have been very fe ";incidents of any dogs fighting or any problems that they have encountered with their dogs for many years. Chair Rennie asked the Parks Commission if they had any questions for Speaker Rodriguez. The following Parks Commissioners had questions for Speaker Rodriguez: Commissioner Deloumi: N:TPW\COMMISSIONS & COMM=ES\Parks COmmission\MR FUTES\2012\DRAFT F6712 Minutmdocx PAGE 10 Parks Commission Minutes February 7, 2012 You indicated that there is something informal in place now for many years. So what has changed in the last few months? Speaker Rodriguez stated that the ranger has been threatening to issue tickets and has given tickets. Chair Rennie stated that staff should address the question of issuing tickets after all speakers have had the opportunity to speak. Commissioner Corenson: The 200 x 200 perimeter, is that a ferlcetiat your setting up? Speaker Rodriguez stated that it is an unf n 1 area used in Bachman Park. Speaker Rodriguez continued to „e plain that it's an area far away from the playground and is set off 1nth'cornenaway from everybody else off `t. of Ellenwood. Speaker Rodr_I uez's final �COmments were that they even fill in the gopher holes and take good care 0 f2hpark and clean up after others who don't. Speaker Jonathan Knowles Speaker Knowles stated that he probably has researched this more than anyone has an that he : has studied -biology and animal behavior and doesn't have an off leash dog . Speaker Knowles also stated his dog is off leash -if in a fenced - w - area. , Speaker Knowles con rnue to say thdtl iere are multiple pages that were talked about Spea WKnowles stated that the last time that this was brought beforethe Pareii,Commission there was 100% unanimous agreement that this was an issue in the community and that it is a shared use, issue. `;Speaker Knowles °stated that there are more dog owners than pro �� ­ _Iy any other single type of park user in the community -this is just a ft ,Speaker Knowles stated that the Town is ironically named due to its 12,50'0 households and 9,000 dogs in the community. Knowles stated that he's thrilled that there's a tennis court near lark, but he doesn't get to say, "Sorry, I don't want tennis players a1 area.” Speaker Knowles reiterated that it's a shared used we need to do something and something has to happen. Speaker Knowles stated that at the last Parks Commission meeting in 2009, the general feeling was that it's working under the table, so let's continue to have it work that way. Speaker Knowles stated that in multiple parks, there are highly organized groups who are doing this and the bottom line is, it's important for dogs to have off leash socialization, as well as their owners. Speaker Knowles also said it's important for the community. Speaker Knowles stated that N:\PPVJ\ COMMISSIONS &COMMMEES\Parks Com issio \MRTL7ES\2012 \DRAFTFeb712 Minates.docx PAGE 11 Parks Commission Minutes February 7, 2012 dogs that have this kind of socialization actually produce fewer biting and barking and any other kind of pet complaints. Speaker Knowles indicated the science is hardeore and there are a lot of specific references to this in the original report that was distributed to the Parks Commission in 2009. Speaker Knowles stated that we've learned a lot, we've interviewed many people and observed the use of our parks and the number of people that use the parks. Speaker Knowles said, by far, the majority of people in the park are with their dogs and no single one community wants to be the one dog park in the Town. Speaker Knowles acknowledged that people in the different neighborhoods want to be bleto walk to their local park and have some off leash time with their d 6peaker Knowles indicated that the parents they talked to while ddiig the research said they would love to know that it's restricted to cert ain hours, if it's done in their park, and also to know that there are options around the Townor people to be able to go and do this kind of activity. Will Speaker Knowles declared that there a big motivation from the Town Council to do this. 5 Chair Rennie asked the Parks Coinmrssion if they had any questions for speaker Iridles. The - follow -Parks Commissioners had questions for Speaker Are you willing ` &put together a petition for all interested parties that could be presented, should we make a motion, to do this so there is significant reinforcement from the community that Town Council could then see? Speaker Knowles said that he doesn't believe a petition is necessary. Speaker Knowles stated bringing stakeholders together to talk about it is a good and important first step. Speaker Knowles also thought that this process needs to be accelerated for this particular item and that the Town Council already has a good insight of this issue. Speaker Knowles expressed that what has been mentioned are all good ideas that have been known for years; your dog must be under verbal control, your dog must stay within the areas that dogs are allowed to be in, you must pick up after your dog, and no aggressive dogs. N: MACOMMISSIONS & COMMu7EE8\Parks CommisslonVMlNtTrES12012\DRAFT Feb712 Minutmdocx PAGE 12 Parks Commission Minutes February 7, 2012 Speaker Knowles continued by saying, as far as policing, we enforce it the way we enforce any ordinance that is broken within the Town. Speaker Knowles stated that if kids are out drinking in the park, we call the Ranger and the Police, and they come out and deal with it. Speaker Knowles stated we'd do the same exact thing for off leash dogs, this isn't special that way. Speaker Knowles stated that with regard to the permitting idea, a lot of communities recommend that the dog has to be licensed and you have to pay the administrative fee and fill out a form and be on a registered list. Speaker Knowles said there are lots of ways to do these kinds of things and that there are best practices already in place by other communities. Au =s Commissioner Gordon asked either the Parks Commission t sense of urgency or prioritizati( than what? Director _Capui necessary since there fis m alrea already. Director Capurso .sta something that we could find_ Capurso staledAhat there wou there is a rule`cha _but that's Speaker i666 Capurso what is missing from :. le residents that will create a greater N ft-NA ar Town Council. If it's not a petition stated thaw petition would not be a high level 2f demonstrated usage what we are ti yfig_ to fmd is if this is vayyto make it s`uceessful. Director )e-a public notificahoi process before the extent of it. it. Scott: will keep doing it until colt warite to state for the record that permitting wasn't issroner Scott also stated that he wanted to make sure speaker addressed the issue because then he'd be if he kept asking it Scott stated that he would like to hear what the from other jurisdictions because he is ill informed about it. Speaker; Knowles said that there is one data point that should be mentlA6d and that is that the Town Attorney at the time, Orry Korb, was commefely in support of this and he said that there was never any legal action in the State of California taken over any municipality that has done this. Commissioner Deloumi: Commissioner Deloumi stated that she would like to hear the rest of the speakers, listen to all the information, and better understand the process. Speaker E. E. Buckholz: NVPVACOMMISSIONS &COMM=ES\Parks Commission N4INO7ES\2012\DRAFTFeb712 Minutes.doox PAGE 13 Parks Commission Minutes February 7, 2012 Speaker Buckholz stated that she would like to withdraw her comments as her issues were being addressed. Speaker Melissa Torran: Speaker Torran stated that she is from the Live Oak Manor Park neighborhood and is in favor of dogs off leash hours in the morning and evening, and indicated that she does not understand the permit process, but will find out about it later. Chair Rennie stated that the potentially limit it to only Los G abusers in order to police repeat along with a permit, it would be of the permit would be to is and take permits away from Chair Rennie also stated that e rangers to enforce. Commissioner Gordon interjected that she'di`dn't want to operationalize this right now. Chair Rennie asked the Parks Commission if they ha any questions for Speaker Torran h There were no further questions for Speaker Torran. licenses for their clogs? that this type of questipl Director Capurso remi the public comment poi Capurso stated that all deliberated. Director asking questions out 01 cards. asked the audience how many of them have air Rennie stated to Commissioner Corenson I'M be asked right now. feel tfie Parks Commissioners that they are still in ,of the Parks Commission meeting. Director abhc comment should be heard, closed and then xp rho stated that the Parks Commissioners are rdcrr and should follow the order of the speaker Speaker Carla House: Speaker House stated that she is part of the group from Bachman Park. Speaker House stated that one thing that needs to be kept in mind is that bringing dogs to the park at certain times makes it safer. Speaker House indicated that this group looks after what is going on, not just with dogs, but also with young children, etc. Speaker House said it brings the community together which is what Los Gatos is all about. Speaker House stated that if you're going to look into other areas that do this, look into other states, such as Boston; dogs off leash is done all the time. Speaker House said it's a neat way of getting to know and take care of people and so forth. Chair Rennie asked the Parks Commission if they had any questions for Speaker House. There were no further questions for Speaker House. NAPPWOMMISSIONS & COMMITTEESTarks CommissionVVItNUFESMIZI)RAFT Feb712 Minutes.docx PAGE 14 Parks Commission Minutes February 7, 2012 Chair Rennie stated to Director Capurso that the Parks Commissioners wants to poll questions. Chair Rennie asked Director Capurso if that was more appropriate for a community meeting rather than a commission meeting. Director Capurso stated that it might be helpful if he reiterates the direction of where this meeting should go. Director Capurso stated that Town Council asked for a status of off leash dog areas in March. Director Capurso stated that this period is too short to get any valuable or measurable community input from the neighborhood perspective on a specific proposal. Director Capurso indicated that there needs to be a level of notification and outreach to surrounding neighborhoods. Director Capurso stated that what staff would like to get from this meeting is the Park Commission's input for what we be telling Town Council - whether a pilot dogs off lea i program is going to be recommended or not. Director Capurso stated r staff is looking :for a short list of parks, approximate times of — ' 'in order to propose an implementation plan based on best practices f Director Capurso asserted that at this point all staff wants is high -level input. Chair Rennie asked the Parks Commission if there were any additional questions or discussion on this for ii show of hands from the audience • Ho�v many dogs are licensed? Speaker Knowles stated that according -to Aml Controlnan Jose probably around 50% of all dogs in their served agency are actually licensed. Speaker Knowles stated that they indicate that it is because most people don't know they are supposed to get °alicense. Speaker Knowles stated the reason we know the number of dogs we have isn't because of licenses, it's because whenever veterinarians give rabies shots to dogs, they report it to Animal Control. Speaker Knowles states they are the ones who came up with the number of 9,000 dogs for Los Gatos based on rabies vaccinations versus licenses. • How many dogs have gone to obedience school and how many have not? • How many of your dogs have chips? • How many or your dogs are small, medium and large? • How many of you pick up your dog's excrement? Speaker Knowles stated that let it be known that the group in this room paid for the dog dispenser boxes that are all along North Santa Cruz. Speaker Knowles stated the money was raised by the people in Los Gatos who NQPWOMMISSIONS & COMMITrEESTarks CommissionWMUES\20MDRAFT Feb712 Minutes.doex PAGE 15 Parks Commission Minutes February 7, 2012 do off leash activities. Speaker Knowles stated that they are replenished by the dog community of Los Gatos on a regular basis, as well as the rangers putting them in the park. Commissioner Deloumi asked for a show of hands of who visits Butcher Park and the dog park in Campbell. Commissioner Deloumi asked how many have been close to a bite situation? Speaker Faral said he wasn't, but his dog was. Speaker Knowles said a bite usually happens because the dog hasn't been properly socialized off leash.;. Chair Rennie closed the publidl omment portion of the the Parks Commission meeting and move for "de iberation of this item. Commissioner Gordon stated that she wanedto make a comment with a recommendation at the end. 14" Commission Gordon said that one of the beautiful ,Ahings about Los Gatos is that it a Town that cares about what tbb,3residents think — we want h here and it's the reason residents can make them happen or not. C'omilhi g oner Gordon also expressed that residents have the benefit of lot of beautiful parks which are shared use. Commissioner Gordon decla ed that a lot of time has been spent figuring out how to accommodate s ccer fields, orts and now it's time to find a way to support the other pas`of our famly — man's best friend. Commission Gordon recbminended that the Parks Commission take into account the interest of the co 4'- ity, create a short list of parks that are a �4c1� likely candidate for an_off leash program and put this issue on the agenda f3f.the ,next Parks Commission meeting. N, - Commissioner Holden stated that she would like to hear from the rangers on why tlidy are writing tickets for dogs, have they always written tickets for dogs drlave they just started writing tickets for dogs. Chair-'Rennie stated that it would be more appropriate to address the question from Commissioner Holden to Director Capurso. Director Capurso stated that the Parks Service Officers have not written an exorbitant amount of citations. Director Capurso stated that citations are issued only on rare occasions. Director Capurso stated that what's more present is the perceived threat that citations are coming, but again, the Park Service Officer hasn't written very many. Parks Service Officer Dave Gray stated that he only recently issued two tickets at Bachman Park. Parks Service Officer Gray further stated that other than those two, he hasn't written a ticket for dogs off leash in three years. Parks Service Officer Gray stated the reason he did it was N:TPVACOMMISSIONS & COMMITTEESTarks Comnusslon\MW[YPEW012\DRAFT Feb712 Minutes.docx PAGE 16 Parks Commission Minutes February 7, 2012 because of the rules in Los Gatos, the County of Santa Clara and the State of California and that is a 6' leash is required at all times and dogs must be kept under physical control, that is the law. Parks Service Officer Gray indicated that it got to the point that there was so much activity at Bachman Park and that some of the people within the playground were continually complaining about it and he had to do something about it. Director Capurso restated that the issues are the conflicting rules and park behavior. Director Capurso stated that the goal is to establish clear definition of these rules and behavior and to find a workable solution that accommodates as many people as possibte Commissioner Scott stated that hqAfg&l very ill informed about this entire issue. Commissioner Scott stated th fae doesn't know what parks and hours are being talked abgpQ what the track record has been on the various violations. Commissioner Scott state&that he would like to be brought up to speed on other municipalities' e)A ences and Los Gatos in particular before he could.even consider a motion` Chair Rennie stated that different kinds of motions can = =li &made and it is probably mappropate to make a motion to approve because the Parks Commission doosp't lK e„ a proposal ;ae Chair Rennie stated more than likely, there wouhd be a motion to ask staff to form a proposal. .4 sliming there is a 200 200 boundary at a certain time and then if the dog itad a problem, would cone still be able to complain to the Parks Service Offacer about v the problem if it's clarified? Director Capurso ,- stated that -he heart of the i5sue�would be if the dog is under the control of the owner iaM Commissioner DeToumi: Why was the person ticketed? Director Capurso stated that he would prefer not to given an answer to a particular incident because the Parks Service "Officer has a pretty good record of not issuing citations on a regular basis. Director Capurso stated that the issuance of a citation is at the discretion of the Parks Service Officer and the circumstance. Commissioner Deloumi stated that she just wants to understand the reason. Director Capurso stated that it may never be answered — if dogs are off leash in play lot and a parent feels threatened, they are within their rights to say that there is a dog owner not in compliance with Town Code. Director Capurso stated that the Town is obligated to do some level of enforcement based on that type of complaint. NVI'VACOMMISSIONS& COMMITTEESTarks CommissionWINUTESMIZI )RAFT Fe6712 Minutmdoex PAGE 17 Parks Commission Minutes February 7, 2012 Commissioner Deloumi stated that if the Parks Commission decides to go further, she wants to make sure there is a means for incorporating and discussing this. Commissioner Gordon said even if the Parks Commission makes a recommendation or motion; the commissioners have to do the diligence behind it in order to pursue it. Commissioner Gordon stated that there is a lot of work to do in terms of where, what are the rules, how do you post information, how do you present it to the Town Council for their review and/or approval. Commissioner Gordon asked the Parks Commission if they agree to make a motion or not. Commissioner Gordon made the following motion. MOTION: Motion made by Commissioner Gordon that staff comes back to arks Commission with a proposal with approprtht parks and other considerations for off leash opportunitlefor dogs. ., Seconded by Comnssoner Holden Chair Rennie asked if there were fluestions or discussion regarding this motion. ,Comrmsgibner Scott stated that his problem is that he has no data and he °wants data' Co ssioUO Corenson wanted to amend the motion to include, as mdre 1& 16, - 11i at dronce, a pilot program. <,�..r 1 3 k Chair Rennie asked if Commissioner Gordon and Commissioner Holden >. agree with Commissioner Corenson s amendment to the original motion. Both commissioners agreed. Chair Rennie asked the Parks Commission if there was any further discussion on this motion. Commissioner Scott asked Director Capurso if staff has the resources to come back with a proposed recommendation, because he is concerned that the Parks Commission and staff don't have the resources to do this. Director Capurso stated that staff will not have an implementation plan ready by March. Director Capurso suspects that if a recommendation is passed, staff will go back to the Town Council in March telling them here is an implementation plan, here's what we think we're going to do and here's the timeline for such a proposal. Director Capurso stated, after which, staff will go back to the Parks Commission and ask for assistance with the implementation plan. WPMCOMMISSIONS & COMMrITEES\Parks CommissionV RINCHES\2012\DRAFr Feb712 Mintamdocx PAGE 18 Parks Commission Minutes asked thew g iscussron on =e vote was tak€ -_ V Director Capurso stated that the resource question is less about responding to the Town Council, Parks Commission and the residents. Director Capurso stated the resource issue and concern is if staff and the Town can manage its own separate dog permit process internally. Director Capurso stated that staff might have to rely on the licensing process that the Town already participates in and may very well recommend that only licensed dogs are able to participate. Chair Rennie asked the Parks Commission if there were any additional comments or discussion on this item. There was no further discussion or comments from the Parks Commission., =, _',-. Chair Rennie asked for the added language of "pilot Corenson. The motion was February 7, 2012 to be re -read to include the ggested by Commissioner Board Clerk. MOTION: Motion made ; back to the Pat appropriate parks ptlotroxam for Seconded by oner Gordon that staff comes ission with"' roposal with considerations for an off leash Comints . n if there were any additional item. There was no further discussion on stated that if the Parks Commissioners have any input program to submit them via email to him. stated that there will be a single community input Capurso indicated that he would like to get the word eash community; the two parks represented tonight and live within a 3 to 500' proximity of those parks. Speaker Faral asked if staff needs assistance in getting volunteers. Director Capurso stated that it is more important that word gets out; the process works best when there's more participation. Speaker Rennie stated that her concern is that this issue will result in ambiguity and wants to make sure that this issue is resolved sooner rather than later. NAMACOMMISSIONS & COMWITEESTarks CommissionWINOTEM2012MRAFT F6712 Minute .docx PAGE 19 Parks Commission Minutes February 7, 2012 Chair Rennie stated that the next step is for staff to come up with the pilot program proposal and that Director Capurso received a lot of input from tonight's speakers. Chair Rennie added that he liked the idea of multiple parks included in the pilot program — Live Oak Manor Park, Bachman Park, La Rinconada Park and Belgatos Park, but it's up to staff to make the recommendation. Chair Rennie stated that the Parks Commission definitely heard from one side of the community tonight, but the opposing side needs to have their concerns addressed as well. Commissioner Corenson wanted account the motion and ideas disc as part of the implementation] issues will take precedence; howel considered as well. if staff was going to take into the Park Commission in 2009, vector Capurso stated current was discussed in 2009 will be Chair Rennie stated to Director Capurso that Commissioner Corenson wants to make sure that staff reviews the minutes from the 2009 Parks Commission meeting. Commission Dehmmi' asked if a sub - committee will be formed. Chair Rennie asked the commissioners if they were interested in being on a sub- committee to discuss the issue versus sending input to staff. x Z Gommis over Scott asked, given the time table and when the next Parks Commrssron meeting is, isn't there a possible scenario that staff is going to make a proposal and Town Council is going to approve it and it's going to be Inpla�eahl that there will be no role for the Parks Commission further,riless Towh Council asks? Director Capurso stated, that is the scenario, but the Town Coucil can provide input on what sites and hours they want to, �see ;abut Town Council is not prepared to propose rules and regulations. Director Capurso stated that the Town Council will certainly look to the`department for that. Commissioner Scott reiterated that he is not sure what the Parks Commission's role is with this moving forward. Director Capurso stated that the Parks Commission is as an advisory body to the Town Council. Director Capurso stated that staff will bring back the information that was heard at tonight's meeting to the Town Council in March and ask for their input. Director Capurso then stated the Parks Commission's role would be to assist in forming the implementation plan — not writing the verbiage, but to define areas within parks, sign locations, etc. Director Capurso indicated that staff will also get input from the community on it as well. N:V'PMCOMMISSIONS & COMMITTEESTarks COmmissionNINUTEM0MDRAFT Feb712 Minutes.docx PAGE 20 Parks Commission Minutes February 7, 2012 Director Capurso said that the Parks Commissioners shouldn't be surprised if staff clears the April meeting to obtain the implementation input from the user group and the residents. Speaker Knowles wanted to go on record that he's not here as an off leash dog user. Speaker Knowles stated he is here as a community member who happens to have a dog, who's always on a leash when she's out. Speaker Knowles stated he is here because as a community member, he thinks it's important for us to deal with — not as a person who will ever let his dog off leash during whatever program you come up with, as much as that would be neat, it's never going to happen for him. Speaker Knowles stated he is here as community -member and not as a user, just to be clear. Chair Rennie closed the Chair Rennie called ft to the remaining items Chair MOTION: from ssion of dogs,-off leash termission at 8: 01 p.m. before reconvening agenda. _ - ��`_ - mss meeting at 8:15 p.m. Corensen to move out of order Iresentations from Community Attorney Judith Propp Deloumi. comments a o. comments `gr VOTE: Ayes: Nays: Abstain: C. Park Volunteerism Vice -Chair Lambert reported that the sub - committee met with a couple of proposed park leaders for Live Oak Manor Park. Vice -Chair Lambert stated that the proposed park leaders will report back to the sub - committee with their thoughts and ideas from that meeting. Vice -Chair Lambert also stated that staff is still working on getting the Town Council apprised on the Park Volunteerism program. asked "-the Parks Commission if there are any further discussion on this item. There were no further iscussion from the Parks Commission. 6 1 0 NAPPW\ COMMISSIONS& COMM=ES\Parks Commission\MR*V=S \2012 \DRAFI'Feb712 Minutes.docx PAGE 21 Parks Commission Minutes D. February 7, 2012 Vice -Chair Lambert stated that he obtained a list of other agencies who adopted similar programs from Community Outreach Coordinator Jackie Rose and will need to review it and will provide an update to the Parks Commission at the next meeting. Chair Rennie asked the Parks Commission if there are any further comments or discussion on this item. There were no further comments or discussion from the Parks Commission. Turf Conversion Update Commissioner Corenson reported Of!' Ye sub - committee held a meeting and had several discussions on how f proceed with turf conversion. Commissioner Corenson reported that the sub - committee proposed the following outline in order to proceed with tuff conversion: 1. Parks and Facilities Superintendent Christy Votter made progress with the Water District. 2. The sub-T 'ttee would like to draw up a basic Iagdl cape plan and use this plaito, conduct a survey, followed by holding a Community Meeting ancbmpl &te efforts by May 2012. 3. Incorporate tie turtooi version plan into the Parks and Public Works Department wotk plan by ,Winner 2012, which would include RIB volunteerism. 4. Develop a plan to cons ue tom a3 - N 'the converted townscapes. Commissioner Scott asked the purpose of turf conversion. Multiple Parks Commissioners explained that it is a means to save Town money ..- by ; using less water, remove - nnmaintained lawn space and make them drought tolerant and to beautify the area. CommY_ssioner Holden indicated that the two areas under consideration for turf conversion are at the corner or Hillbrook and Blossom Hill Road ( Hillbrook Townscape) and the intersection of Los Gatos - Almaden Road and Los,6a s Boulevard (El Gato Triangle). Vice -Chair Lambert asked if it is worth the Parks Commission's time to move , forward with this project since there has been little progress. Commissioner Holden replied that it's taking a long time because it's been difficult getting the information from the Water District. Parks and Facilities Superintendent Wolter stated that the next step is to submit the formal plan to the Water District before making their final approval. Parks and Facilities Superintendent Wolter stated the Water District wants to see the layout and specifics of the turf conversion plan. NAPMCOMMISSIONS & COMMMrEESTarks Commission\M]J TES\20l2\DRAFr F6712 Minutes.docx PAGE 22 Parks Commission Minutes February 7, 2012 Commissioner Holden asked if a motion is needed in order to survey the neighborhoods. Director Capurso stated that if this is a Town project then staff has to have some involvement. Director Capurso further stated that staff doesn't survey; staff generally holds a community process. Commissioner Corenson proposed that through volunteerism that the Parks Commission develop a survey (which is done), approve the survey and then volunteers conduct the survey. Commission Corenson stated that once that is complete with the Town's efforts there can be the community outreach step. Director Capurso stated that to efforts are redundant. Director Ca volunteers conduct a coxnxnuni tY:I?3 Town. nissioner Corenson that those stated that his concern is having and not adequately represent the Commission Corenson Wsponded that the purpose to get input from community members surr n ding the parks and that it_be used as input for the community meeting. Commissioners Corenson�sfated it would give an indication, as _to whether there va interest in this =JPtogram or not. Director Capurso stated he would fee that happening at the community meeting, such - s w1iht place M,, e first meeting for the Creekside Sports Park. Director Capurso stated t- adding a survey to the process is _a sathex labor intensive step in der to get outreach from the �commuity by just having the commu meeting. ` Commissioner Deloumi stated that she would like to know how much the Town would save from the turf conversion projects. Commissioner _ Deloumi statedtlatgiven the Town's current budget situation, are there :. . resoces to move forward:witfi this project if it has no beneficial value to it Vice -Chair Lambert agreed with Commissioner Deloumi that it sounds like a good idea and is an interesting thing to do, but what kind of impact would it have for the Town. Director Capurso stated that this is the big unanswered question because there are no Town resources allocated for this program; it's not the priority of the community or the Town Council. Commissioner Deloumi proposed that perhaps the Parks Commission should understand the financial benefits of this project before moving on to the next level. Commissioner Deloumi stated that if there are major savings, then it makes sense to move forward, but the Parks Commission should understand it. Director Capurso stated that there isn't a major savings, but there is a savings and it's not more than $ l Ok for the two sites indicated. RTPWOMMISSIONS& COMMITTEES\Parl� Commission\MWUTES12012\DRAFr Feb712 Minutes.docx PAGE 23 Parks Commission Minutes February 7, 2012 Multiple Commissioners continued to debate extensively on the purpose and validity of this project. Commissioner Scott stated that it's an important issue and that he was asked about it during his interview process. Commissioner Scott further stated that the Town Council already recognizes it as an important issue and as an advisory body; the Parks Commission should do its due diligence and bring it forward for consideration in 2012/13. Vice -Chair Lambert stated that this project needs staff involvement in order to succeed. After much deliberation, it was decided that the Parks Commission will give staff a summary of the financial information for the turf conversion project in order to get it in , ,the proposed Capital Budget for 2012/13. It was agreed that Commissioners Corenson and Holden will send the report ���=.. to Director Capurso at +least three weeks before the April meeting so that it will be included on the agenda and be ready for distribution and discussion. ° >,, - s; Director Capurso also suggested that the Parks Commission make a motion at the next meeting to recommend that the Parks and Public Works Department include it in the 2012/13 Capital Program. 14ChairEkennie asked the Parks Commrss on if there were any further scomments - r - discussion on this item. There were no further comments or - -- - - ssion i the Parks Commission. w 6 Chazr R° nme cYosed the discussion of the turf conversion program. Commissaoner. Sandy '"Gordon excused herself firom tine Parks Commission nzeetcng at 9:22 p.m. E. La Rinconada Commissioner Holden presented the newly designed interpretive sign produced by Student Commissioner Haserot to the Parks Commission as an informational item. Commission Holden indicated that one sign will be displayed in La Rinconada Park and is fully funded by herself. Chair Rennie asked the Parks Commission if there were any further comments or discussion on this item. Vice -Chair Lambert asked whose name will be on it and will it be the Parks Commission. Commissioner Gordon stated that there will be no name on it. NAPPW\COMMISSIONS & COMMITTEESTarks CommissionWINUCESUOMDRAFr Feb712 Minutes.docx PAGE 24 Parks Commission Minutes February 7, 2012 Vice - Lambert wanted to express that he doesn't understand the purpose of the interpretive sign and doesn't find it educational. Commissioner Scott agreed with Vice -Chair Lambert, but doesn't see any harm in displaying it. Chair Rennie asked the Parks Commission if there were any further comments or discussion on this item. There were no farther comments or discussion from the Parks Commission. Commissioner Barbara Holden excused herself from the Parks Commission meeting at 9:26P. m. A ` n-, VI. ITEMS FOR INFORMATION A. Brown Act & Presentation Judith Propp by Town Attorney Town Attorney Propp - 1 Town for all of their Town Attorne that the Town the Parks Comnussion on behalf of the eer -; =hours they have , contributed as that in support and in return of their service irovide them with the proper resources and s ca_ =_ ssioners for the Town serving lations, their job is to be open and the confines of the Brown Act. ;d to state that the idea of the Brown Act do the public's business in front of the Propp discussed the following Brown Act guidelines and he Parks Commission: ,ct meetings, exceptions to meeting definitions, serial technological /email /phone conferencing Agendas, notices and public participation Closed Sessions Brown Act violations Town Attorney Propp discussed the following requirements for California Form 700 — Fair Political Practices Commission (FPPC) with the Parks Commission: N TRACOMMISSIONS & COMMITTEES\Pad� CommisslonWllNVrES\2012DRAFT Feb712 Nautes.docx PAGE 25 Parks Commission Minutes February 7, 2012 • Members of boards and commissions not yet covered under a conflict -of- interest code must fill out California Form 700. • The deadline date to file this form with the Town Clerk is April 1, 2012. Town Attorney Judith Propp stated to contact the Town Clerk or herself for additional questions or refer to the Fair Political Practices Commission. Town Attorney Propp also stated that the Town will be conducting, under state law, AB 1234 Ethics Training for all commissioners. Town Attorney Propp stated that this is a requirement for commissioners to complete in 2012. Town Attorney Propp stated that commissioners are required to complete this training every two years. Town Attorney Propp stated that training for AB 1234 training will be offered online or conducted by the Town's legal counsel. �as�a B. Los Gatos Shines Presentation by Q lfimumity Outreach Coordinator Jackie Rose va� lk m Community Outreach CoordatRV ose presented and distributed an informational flyer regarding the Los Gatos Shines program to the Parks Commission. cs" mURI utreach Coordinator Rose stated that the purpose of the program is °to make volunteering easier for community members to par ttcrpate`ina Town coordinated volunteer program. Community Outreach Coordinator Rose further stated that the Parks and Public Works D partmentbvoit7c� x be involved with the implementation and Community Oufr ch Coordinator Rose stated the program would provide and allow volunteers to: 1. Choose an area where they would like to assist with trash pickup, trail maintenance or various clean -up efforts throughout the Town. 2. Volunteer projects can be scheduled and organized through the Community Outreach Coordinator, Monday through Thursday, between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 3:30 p.m. 3. The Town will provide trash bags, vests (on loan) and trash grabbers (on loan). Community Outreach Coordinator Rose stated that the program would require minimal staff time and that the estimated cost to run the program would be approximately $600 per year. N:TPWCOMMISSIONS & COMM=ES\Parks Commisslon\MMUTES\2012DRAFT F6712 Minutes.doex PAGE 26 Parks Commission Minutes February 7, 2012 Community Outreach Coordinator Rose stated that the cost has been approved by the Town Manager's Office and the next step would be to request the Parks Commission's recommendation, and bring it forward to approval for the Town Council. Chair Rennie opened up the floor to the Parks Commission for discussion of the Los Gatos Shines program. Multiple Parks Commissioners discussed cost and benefits of this program with Community Outreach Coordinator Rose and staff. After much discussion, the Parks Commission approved their recommendation of the Los Gatos Shines program C. Parks Update 1. Creekside Sports a. Parks and Facilities Superintendent Wolter provided the following timeline 'of tie Creeside Sports Parks to the Parks Commission:'_" may • Plans and specifications mere approved by the Town Council on Monday, February 6, 2012 v gQ •,_ Bid opening is scheduled for Wednesday, March 7, 2012. • Construction to begin in April 201`2. N - 1 • ` ompletion scheduled for the.end of this summer. 2 l ;Oak Meadow Park a. Parks, and Facilities Superintendent Wolter reported on the following Meadow Park: • Proled"yti as awarded by the Town Council on Monday, February 6, 2012 • The renovation will include picnic areas #1 and 92 to address several deficiencies of the picnic areas, including concrete floor, barbecue areas, and the replacement of fencing around the airplane play structure. 3. Live Oak Manor Park a. Parks and Facilities Superintendent Wolter reported on the following regarding Live Oak Manor Park: • Project for the paved pathway at Live Oak Manor Park will go out to bid at the end of the fiscal year. • Construction to begin in August 2012. NVPwACOMMISSIONS & COMM717EESTarrks Cominission\MRTUTES\2012'J)RAFT Feb712 Minutes.don PAGE 27 Parks Commission Minutes VII. COMMISSION /COMMITTEE MEETING REPORTS A. Beautification Committee No meeting, no report B. Bicycle Advisory Committee No meeting, no report VIII. DIRECTOR MATTERS Director Capurso provided the following on January 28, 2012 and the Town budget February 7, 2012 (Holden) (Gordon) the Town Council Retreat Commission: • Budget Update — The General Fuiid shortfall for 2012/13 was updated from the original amount of approximately $4M was °downgraded to $1.4M due predominantly to the redirection of the NetFhx sal,* tax to the Town. • Budget Proposals — Staff is now working on the Operating Budget Proposal for 2012/13 after receiving direction from the Town Councr • Budget Priorities ",e Town defined the budget priorities for the next fiscal year through a trered`system of high to low priorities. Nom, IX. ATTENDANCE A '? Fr...,. A.c The current Town Attendanc�>Resolution No. 2003 — 136 states that any Commissioner who is absent -from four (4) regular meetings held in a 12 month period, shall surrender hi or her office on the Commission. Please contact the Commission Chair "or the Parks and Public Works Department at (408) ,.9 ;5770 if you are unable to attend. 0 i made by Commissioner Corenson that the February at 9:35 p.m., to the next meeting of Tuesday, April 3, 2012. Seconded bv?Commissioner Scott. VOTE: Motion carried unanimously. Next Regular Meeting: Tuesday, April 3, 2012, 6:00 p.m. Minutes approved at the Parks Commission Meeting on Date Day, Year. Respectfully Submitted by: D Romero, Parks and Public Works Administrative Assistant / Board Clerk N: MA COMMISSIONS & COMMTPTEES\Parks Commission\MWOTES \2012 \DRAFT Feb712 Minutes.docx PAGE 28 Attachment 2 From: Town PPW Subject: FW: (TC Agenda item) bark for a park - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Jerry Bannan Imailto:slbannanCeDcomcast.netl Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2012 11:20 AM To: Council Subject: bark for a park To all council members, I am a long time resident of downtown Los Gatos. I am NOT in favor of a any off leash activities at any parks especially Bachman Park. Many residents and other dog owners already allow their dogs to run off leash at Bachman park as I have witnessed many times. Why does Los Gatos have to be known as a dog friendly town? People are already bringing their dogs into stores and restaurants no matter what the regulations may be. The downtown sidewalks and nearby streets more often that not have dog pop that an owner has not bothered to pick up. Please consider this issue carefully. Thank you, Sheila Bannan, 118 Massol Ave., Los Gatos. THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK