Loading...
Attachment 1ar O 44 R L ►� li C (0 L .X N y 0 ( l0 M h fy) C ° M E E ° O 4 r 4 1. 7 L er C' I H G Ol a m F a m _. .... __..._. . _ j........_....M..._ -- -0. �. - l0. o N dt W Ul—m U1 N N L N y •Ln-( N +� o ro 0 � � C o C u CA � N N Co I� N Q 0 Ln N [t (n H ri rn rn L (� to S. d R L � H O M N r-9 01 a N N l0 L!1 L L -i N N r4 ,4 lu a , Q1 U L L ~ t N d' l0 M N L 'X� W r-I ri rl ri ri O 44 R L ►� li . EXHIBIT 9 C (0 L .X h � L � v C ° M E E ° O a ° o 1. 7 L C' I H G Ol a m F a m . EXHIBIT 9 This Page Intentionally Left Blank The Organization July 5, 2011 Wendy Rooney Director of Community Development Town of Los Gatos 110 E. Main St Los Gatos, CA 95031 Sobrato Development Company, LLC Sobrato Family Holdings, LLC Sobrato Builders, Incorporated Sobrato Family Foundation Sobrato Construction Corporation CEN© JUL 0 5 Z01 TOVVN OF LOS GATOS PLANNING DIVISION RE: 135 Terrace Drive, State Density Bonus, Rezoning Dear Ms. Rooney: The Sobrato Organization formally requests the Town of Los Gatos consider applying the State Density Bonus Government Code to our zoning application to add 50 new multifamily residential units and various new site amenities to Riviera Terrace at 135 Terrace Drive. Riviera Terrace was built around 1960 and is comprised of 123 units on approximately 5.9 acres. The Sobrato Organization purchased this property in 2001 and has made significant investments to improve the property. Unfortunately, properties developed during this period including the subject property were not designed with amenities that are common and expected by today's renters interested in living in larger apartment communities. The commonly desired amenities include such facilities as a resident community room, leasing and business office, pool, spa and fitness room. The Sobrato Organization looks at all of its holdings with a long term view and has been exploring ways to physically and financially support the addition of such amenities at Riviera Terrace for more thanl0 years. We are excited about this proposal and its ability to enhance the quality living experience at Riviera Terrace. Our proposal is to add 50 new living units along with a new pool and spa, a fitness center, a resident lounge /community room and a leasing business office. Our team has studied this project over an extended period of time and feel that the proposed addition is sensitive to the existing resident community, utilizes the sites current attributes while greatly enhancing the overall quality of life at Riviera Terrace. The current project density is 123 units on 5.9 acres or 20.8 units per acre. The current maximum density per the Town's zoning designation of R1M 12 -20 is 118 units. Section 65915 of the State Government code, often referred to as the "The State Density Bonus ", provides for the granting of residential density bonus units above the existing local land use designation along with other incentives to a developer in exchange for the project producing an increment of lower income units within the development. The Sobrato Organization is proposing to apply the Density Bonus section of the State code to support the addition of the 50 new units to Riviera Terrace. This section provides 10600 N. De Anza Boulevard, Ste. 200, Cupertino, CA 95014 -2075 P (408) 446 -0700 F (408) 446 -0583 www.sobrato.com PVTFT'Drm I n that should the developer designate 20% of the existing units as affordable within a project, the project may be justified to exceed the local zoning designations by a minimum of 35 %. None of the existing project's 123 units are currently designated as affordable. Following this provision, 20% would be designated as affordable to low income households totaling 24 units. Further following the provision, 118 units (currently allowed) x 20 %- 159 units plus the 24 affordable units in the existing project suggests using the State Density Bonus would allow for a total of 183 units. However, our proposal is to provide the 20% affordable (24 units) within the existing 123 units and adding 50 new units for a total of 173. Additionally, we are also proposing to provide one of the new two bedroom units as affordable making the total 25 units affordable to low income residents within a new project total of 173 units at Riviera Terrace. In addition to the community benefit of providing the affordable rental units within the project, some of the proposed project enhancements for all of Riviera Terrace residents to enjoy include: ® Using select new buildings to create and enhance the overall living environment, $ Replacing the pool and adding a spa facility, ® Providing . a fitness facility, Providing a leasing office and resident lounge facility, Improving and enhancing the current onsite storm drainage system to better treat existing and new site drainage, ® Improving the project's overall onsite parking ratio and facilities, Remove segments of existing impermeable areas of the parking lot and replace with permeable pavers to enhance site drainage and filtration, Replace many of the site sidewalks and impermeable landscape areas with new sidewalks and improved permeable landscape features, ® Refurbishing and enhancing the project landscape areas including significant new tree plantings, Create two fenced project trash enclosures, • Respect, preserve and enhance various existing specimen trees, Furthermore, in response to discussions with Town staff, The Sobrato Organization is also offering the Town the option to buy down further the affordability of any of the 25 affordable units to target the Town's lower affordability goals (with RDA housing funds). We are also proposing that we would submit to the Town Planning staff a marketing and management plan that addresses the phasing and lease -up of the affordable units prior to the pulling of the first building permit. It is anticipated that existing residents will be provided the earliest opportunity to submit applications for qualification should they desire and that no existing residents would be relocated nor displaced in the development and implementation of this plan. The Sobrato Organization is excited about this project and its ability to dramatically enhance the living environment for the residents of Riviera Terrace. The Sobrato Organization also values its residents and appreciates that the construction of a project like this will have impacts that can't be totally mitigated or avoided.. We are committed to taking every step reasonable in construction phasing and staging to minimize the impacts and to strive to coordinate and inform the residents through all phases of construction. Though some construction impacts are unavoidable, The Sobrato Organization and the residents can look past the short construction period to the enhanced quality of living these new additions will provide to the Riviera Terrace community. We look forward to your favorable support of this application and working closely with Town staff to process, approve and construct the proposed project. Sincerely, Tie9St Senior Director, Real Estate Planning This Page Intentionally Left Blank 1 1 10 1 It 20io TOWN OF LOS GATOS PLANNING DIVISION AM In The Town of Los Gatos May 10, 2010 Pleasanton Fresno Sacramento Santa Rosa www.tikm.com EXHI BIT TJ KM Transportation Consultants ,; �h Vision That Moves Your Community Final Traffic I Study for the Proposed Riviera Terrace Apartm liks Expansion Traffic Study www.tjkm.com Prepared by: TJKM Transportation Consultants 3875 Hopyard Road Suite 200 Pleasanton, CA 94588 -8526 Tel: 925.463.061 1 Fax: 925.463.3690 JAJURISDICTIOWALos Gatos \021 -093 On -call Sewices \Task 013 - Riviera Terrace Apts TIS \Report\R 051 -0IO.docx f TJKM Transportation Consultants Table of Contents Introductionand Summary I ................................................................... ............................... Introduction.......................................................................................................................... ............................... I Summary................................................................................................................................ ............................... I Intersection Analysis Methodology ....................................................... ..............................4 IntersectionAnalysis Methodology .................................................................................. ..............................4 Level of Service Analysis Methodology ......................................................................... ............................... 4 SignificantImpact Criteria .................................................................................................. ..............................5 StudyIntersections .......................................................................................................... ..............................5 FreewaySegments ........................................................................................................... ..............................5 ExistingTraffic Conditions 6 .................................................................... ............................... Levelof Service Analysis ..................................................................................................... .............:................6 Summary of Machine Count Data .................................................................................... ..............................6 Existing plus Approved (Background) Conditions 8 .............................. ............................... Levelof Service Analysis ..................................................................................................... ..............................8 Backgroundplus Project Conditions I ................................................. ............................... ProjectTrip Generation .................................................................................................. ............................... I I Project Trip Distribution and Assignment .................................................................. ............................... I I ProjectAccess and Circulation ........................................................................................ .............................12 Levelof Service Analysis ..........:......................................................................................... .........................:...14 QueuingAnalysis ................................................................................................................. .............................16 Pedestrian, Bicycle and Transit Accessibility ................................................................ .............................16 SWITRSAnalysis ................................................................................................................. .............................16 FreewaySegment Analysis ................................................................................................ .............................17 Background plus Project plus Pending Conditions ........................... ............................... 18 Level Service Analysis .................................................................................................. ............................... 18 Conclusions ........................................................................................... ............................... 20 StudyParticipants and R eferences 21 ..................................................... ............................... TJKMPersonnel ................................................................................................................... .............................21 Others.................................................................................................................................. ............................... 21 References............................................................................................................................ .............................21 List of Appendices Appendix A — Level of Service Analysis Methodology Appendix B — Traffic Data Appendix C — Level of Service Worksheets: Existing Conditions Appendix D — Level of Service Worksheets: Existing plus Approved Conditions Appendix E — Level of Service Worksheets: Existing + Approved + Project Conditions Appendix F — Level of Service Worksheets: Existing + Approved + Project + Pending Conditions ` TJ KM Transportation Consultants List of Figures Figure1: Vicinity Map ...................................................... ............................... . ............................... ............. 2 Figure2: Proposed Site Plan .................................................................................................. ............................... 3 Figure3: Existing Conditions .................................................................................................. ..............................7 Figure 4: Existing + Approved Peak Hour Conditions ..................................................... ..............................9 Figure 5: Project Trip Distribution and Assignment ...........:.....................:...................... .............................13 Figure 6: Background plus Project Peak Hour Conditions ............................................. .............................15 Figure 7: Background + Project + Pending Conditions ................... ....................... ..........................19 List of Tables Table I: Intersection LOS — Existing Conditions........ ...... ..... .................. 6 Table I(: Intersection LOS = Existing plus Approved (Background) Conditions ...... .........................10 Table III: Project Trip Generation ..........................................::...:::.................................................................. I I Table IV: Intersection LOS — Background plus Project Conditions ............................. .............................14 Table V: Summary of Collision Rates ........... .......... ...........16 .............................................. ............................... . Table VI: Summary of Freeway Segment Analysis ............................................................ .............................17 Table VII: Intersection LOS — Background + Project + Pending Conditions ............. .............................18 TJ KM Transportation Consultants Introduction and Summary Introduction This report presents the results of TJKM's traffic impact analysis for the proposed Riviera Terrace Apartments expansion at 135 Riviera Drive in the Town of Los Gatos. The project site currently is an existing Riviera Terrace Apartment complex and the project applicant is proposing to expand the existing 132 -unit apartment complex to 179 -unit apartment complex, an increase of 56- apartment units. The new apartment units are proposed to be located in four new buildings adjacent to the existing buildings. Figure I illustrates the project location and its vicinity. Figure 2 represents the proposed site plan. Summary Based on the trip generation rates provided in the ITE Trip Generation Manual (8th edition), the proposed project expansion is estimated to add 372 daily trips with 29 trips occurring during the a.m. peak hour and 35 trips occurring during the p.m. peak hour. All study intersections operate at an acceptable level of service (LOS) of D or better under existing conditions. With the addition of project trips, all the study intersections are expected to continue to operate acceptably (LOS D or better) during both the peak hours. Similarly, all the study intersections are expected to operate acceptably for the future study scenarios. Based on the HCM 2000 methodology using Traffix analysis for the plus project conditions, a 95th percentile queue of one vehicle (or 25 feet) is expected at the stop control approach of the intersection University Avenue /Towne Terrace. With the addition of proposed project trips, the queue is expected to remain at 25 feet. Based on the machine counts conducted in 2010, the highest peak hour (p.m. peak) the peak directional traffic flow (eastbound) on Towne Terrace is approximately 79 vph. With the addition of approximately 23 p.m. peak hour inbound project trips, the study segment is expected to remain within the acceptable capacity limits at LOS B. Similarly, the peak directional flow on University Avenue is approximately 385 vehicles per hour in the vicinity of the project. With the addition of approximately 13 peak hour trips, the study segment is expected operate acceptably at LOS B. TJKM recommends installation of a raised pork -chop Island with ADA access for replacing the existing striped pork -chop island on westbound approach of Towne Terrace at University Avenue for improving the safety of crossing pedestrians and the turning vehicles. This striped pork -chop Island separates westbound left -turn and right -turn movements. It should be noted that Milllbrae Lane and Rushmore Lane dead end at Riviera Drive, a private road for the Riviera Terrace Apartments. An emergency vehicle would have to use the private road for turn - around. Final — Riviera Terrace Apartments Expansion Traffic Study Page I May 10, 2010 r Town of Los Gatos - Riviera Terrace Apartments Expansion Traffic Study Figure Vicinity Map 1.ORTH Not to Scale LEGEND • Study Intersection 21- 093 -T1 3 - 2/25110 - VG TJKM Transportation ` Consultants Intersection Ar Intersection Ana The following sixi[ I. University: 2. University,, 3. University 4. University: 5. University, 6. University'. As per Town's dir I. Existing=Co 2. Existing j7[u roadwa �c y: vicinity ''of - 3. Backgrauri added frog 4. Backgroun Condition% vicinity , . Level of Service The operating con 2000 Highway Cap compliance with =tI Clara Valley Trans as average delay. The operating con Capacity Manual. (I intersection condi levels of service (L delay and LOS are > �:�t approach (or W6 A level of service an A through f let, flow conditions -w delays and long . .,§d traffic impact analysis: ) — a CMP intersection 'traffic study: i and roadway conditions. (Year 20 10) traffic volumes and )roved developments within the Conditions, but with traffic to Background plus Project m future pending projects in the ctions were evaluated using the tained in TRAFFIX software in methodology, adopted by the Santa i1tersection conditions are reported As of service. e evaluated using the 2000 Highway FFIX software. Peak hour Js 'per vehicle with corresponding the overall intersection average ontrol intersections, the minor i operations and is reported using congestion. LOS A indicates free ed conditions with excessive it in Appendix A. F Page 4 Final — Riviera Terrace Apartments Expansion Traffic Study May 10, 20/0 TJKM Transportation Consultants Significant Impact Criteria Study Intersections The Town's level of service standard is LOS D. Intersections that fall below LOS D are considered impacted and should be considered for mitigation. Also, the proposed project is considered to have a significant impact if it causes the levels of service for the study intersections to drop more than one level if it is at LOS A, B, or C, and drop any further if it is at D or worse. A CMP intersection traffic LOS standard is LOS E. If the traffic analysis shows that a project development is projected to cause traffic LOS on a CMP facility (roadway or intersection) to fall from LOS E or better to LOS F under project conditions, then the project is said to impact the facility. The study intersection Los Gatos Saratoga Road /University Avenue is a CMP intersection. Freeway Segments Based on VTA's Transportation Impact Analysis Guidelines, a project is said to impact a freeway segment determined to be at LOS F under existing or background conditions, if the number of new added project trips is more than one percent of the freeway capacity. Final — Riviera Terrace Apartments Expansion Traffic Study Page 5 May 10, 2010 TJKM Transportation Consultants Existing Traffic Conditions Level of Service Analysis Peak hour turning movement counts at the study intersections were conducted during February of 2010. Figure 3 illustrates the existing lane configuration and Figure 4 illustrates the peak hour turning movement volumes at thb`stud'y intersections. The raw tra c'counts are provided in Appendix B. Table I summarizes the results of the intersection analysis under Existing Conditions. The detailed LOS calculations (TRAFFIX Output) are contained in Appendix C. Under Existing Conditions,"all` study intersectlons'operate at an acceptable service level (LOS D or . , better) Table I: Intersection LOS — Existing Conditions Intersection Control A.M. Peak Hour P.M. Peak Hour Average Deldy (sec/deh) LOS Average belay (sec /veh) LOS I. University Avenue /Blossom Hill Road Signal 22.8 C+ 25.0 C 2. University Avenue /Roberts Road All -way Stop 10.3 B 10.3 B 3. University Avenue /Andrews. Avenue All -way Stop 16.5 C 13.2 B 4, University Avenue /Towne Terrace One -way Stop 13.5 B 13.2 B 5. University Avenue /Chester Street One -way Stop 12.1 B 12.9 B 6. University Avenue /Los Gatos Saratoga Road Signal 28.7 C 37.0 D+ Note: Delay = Overall average intersection delay in seconds for All -way Stop control Intersections, or Minor street (worst approach) delay for One -way or Two -way Stop Control intersections; LOS = Level of Service Summary of Machine Count Data TJKM conducted weeklong traffic counts between Monday, 2/8/10 through Sunday, 2/14/ 10 for University Avenue and Towne Terrace. The ADT in the northbound and southbound directions on University Avenue north of Towne Terrace are 2,911 vehicles per day (vpd) and 4,138 vpd, respectively. The ADT in eastbound and westbound directions on Towne Terrace Avenue east of Avery Lane are 720 vpd and 730 vpd, respectively. Final — Riviera Terrace Apartments Expansion Traffic Study Page 6 May 10, 2010 t Town of Los Gatos - Riviera Terrace Apartments Expansion Traffic Study Figure Existing Conditions 3 Intersection #I IniversityAve. /Blossom Hill Rd. CO M A �� 9 X1 5 > 296, 378) --V ) (2>1 N CO M A Intersection #5 University AveJChester St �r L O M � 14 l r 1 3 m rn� m Intersection #6 UniversityAveJ Los Gatos - Saratoga Rd. CID 0 0 >� ( 13 X36 >) X 6 >s (8p 2 > (31 ) rs8 f �M h � Intersection #2 University Ave. /Roberts Rd. &� CV11�� N M X 20 (7 f yj 19 19 41 411 1 1 4p � M y� CO Intersection #3 JniversityAve. /Andrews St. ro CO 45(9 �► -A. L `N (� � O M Intersection #4 University Ave./Towne Terrace N N � 1 . &—,93 (43,1 n M � M Traffic Signal Stop Sign TJN1 Transportation Consultants llr� ` ' Approved (Background) Conditions itk»nu 'This Scenario |o similar tn Existing Conditions, but with the addition of traffic from approved developments within the mved projects consist cf developments that either under construction, are built but not fully occupied, or"that a,re not built but have final development approval from the Town. Based on recent communication with the Town stak ih following fifteen approved projects are expected to contribute somd'traffic through the study intersections: 2. 17975 Foster Road (rooidendalaub'd|v|o|on) 3. 15700 Shady Lane (single family residential) 4. 371 Los Gatos Boulevard.(r 5. 55 Los Gatos Saratoga (�eiail/office) 6. 15720 Winchester Boulevard (office development replaces a single-family home) 7. 14881 National Avenue`(rnqdical office" development replaces a single-family home) 9. M44 National Avenue (single-family housing replaces a church) 1 15400 Los Gatos Bc,616�ard; - (6ffice/`�etail) 11. 930 University' M`e'nue (self-si66je.)- niversityAv6nu_(§ln'46' M 15. 15940 Blosso.m Hill R6ad/Old 'Blossom Hill Road �si ngle-fam i ly residential� 16. To W'n Library (new librar' 17. 470 N, Santa Cruz Ave6ue' (Saf�wq grocery store expansion) These projects are expected to add - a total of 700 Y"ehicular.trips during the a.m. peak hour and 1,009 vehicular trips during thd` peak hour in 'the town of C6 Gatos street network. Level of Service 'Analysis Figure 5 illustrates the Existing plus Approved turning movement volumes and Table 11 summarizes the results of the intersection analysis. The 'detailed LOS calculations are contained in Appendix D. Page |Rnu - KivirmTenoc Apartments Expansion Traffic Study May /0,20/0 r" i Town of Los Gatos - Riviera Terrace Apartments Expansion Traffic Study Figure Existing Plus Approved Conditions 4 Intersection #I UniversityAveJBlossom Hill Rd. Intersection #2 University Ave. /Roberts Rd, Intersection #3 University Ave. /Andrews St. Intersection #4 University Ave./Towne Terrace ^N N o N ^ 7 50(4 4 �! A — 89 f y 81 NNry 72() 4 J4 �) ^ A� N� 1 t� r 93 (43 j 324 � 3g'9 - SJ 22 y 1 16 X1,9 I 4p 4g 10 8 (106 —� (27 ui y N 5� �° rn �^ W ( f Oy Mho �(D N m Intersection #5 UniversityAveXhester St. `V C V b AVFSA� E �7� q EARLEYRb 78 7 74 3 j m WES'r ELL_ sRN bEAVE w B U ENE N 3 z v �ARIa cq ,tti A�F SA Intersection #6 A A' ° AS A� HLERA� Q 1 e< OS SAM 40 e UniversityAveJ ��= HILL Los Gatos - Saratoga Rd. _ iv = Ro �`� e sr Projec� ROeRRT o Q Site � y . M`-� ST s R0, NON yT 15B (7 SO S 2 3 H & SELL ° A�F 4 X2 1 � 7 (6jJ� x.2 g5 (8 8 cA�os �° 4 T INE l V � 1 (3l y J 7'(,9 J egby A�� pFR 5 ESTER sT °iro Traffic Signal z Stop Sign hk TJ KM Transportation Consultants �r Tahla IL• Intersection LOS — Existing plus Approved (Background) Conditions Intersection Control A.M. Peak Hour P.M. Peak Hour Tahla IL• Intersection LOS — Existing plus Approved (Background) Conditions Intersection Control A.M. Peak Hour P.M. Peak Hour Average Delay (sec /veh) LOS Average Delay (sec /veh) LOS 1. University Avenue /Blossom Hill Road Signal 22.4 C 25.3.. C 2, University Avenue /Roberts Road` All -way Stop 10.5 B 10.8 B 3. University Avenue /Andrews Avenue Ail -way Stop 17.8 C 14.6 B 4. University Avenue /Towne Terrace One -way Stop 13.6 B- 13.4 B 5. University Avenue /Chester Street One -way Stop 12.1 B 13.1 B 6. University Avenue /Los Gatos Saratoga Road Signal 28.8 C 38.1 D+ Note: Ueiay = Uverau average intersection oeiay in seconus wr mii -way aLUP 1-Ul iu U Intersections, or Minor street (worst approach) delay for One -way or Two -way Stop Control intersections; LOS = Level of Service Given the amount of trips from -the approved developments, the increase in average delay at the study intersections is negligible (less-than two seconds of average delay). Therefore, all study intersections are expected to continue to operate at acceptable conditions (LOS D or better) under the Existing plus Approved (Background) Project Conditions. Final - Riviera Terrace Apartments Expansion Traffic Study Page 10 May 10,.2010 TJ KM Transportation Consultants Background. plus Project Conditions This Scenario is identical to the Existing plus Approved Conditions, but with traffic added from the proposed Riviera Terrace Apartments expansion project. The project applicant is proposing to develop the existing site to include an additional 56- apartment units to be housed in four new buildings. Figure 2 on page 3 shows the lay out the proposed apartment complex expansion. Project Trip Generation The Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) has compiled the results of trip generation research from over 4,250 individual land use studies throughout the United States and Canada. The 8th edition of the Trip Generation contains trip generation rates for over 140 different land use codes. Trip generation rates for the proposed project are based on data published in this manual. ITE Land Use Code 220 (Apartments) was used for the trip generation calculation. Table III shows the project trip generation estimates for the proposed apartment complex expansion project. The proposed project is expected to generate 29 trips (6 inbound and 23 outbound trips) during the a.m. peak hour and 35 trips (23 inbound and 12 outbound) during the p.m, peak hour. Table III: Project Trip Generation Notes: Source — ITE Trip Generation, 8th Edition; DU = Dwelling Units Land Use Size Daily A.M. Peak P.M. Peak (ITE Code) Rate Trips' Rate o In / Out a /o In Out Total Rate In o / 0 Out / In Out Total Apartments 56 6.65 372 0.51 20 80 6 23 29 0,62 65 35 23 12 35 (220) DU Project Trip Distribution and Assignment Trip distribution assumptions for the proposed project were developed based on existing travel patterns, knowledge of the study area and input from Town staff. Traffic from the proposed project is expected to travel to and from the site according to the distribution assumptions shown on Figure 6 and described below: ® 40 percent will travel to /from the north via SR 17 ® 10 percent will travel to /from the south via SR 17 a 6 percent will travel to /from the north via Winchester Boulevard ® 10 percent will travel to /from north via University Avenue ® 10 percent will travel to /from north via Los Gatos Boulevard ® 5 percent will travel to /from the east via Blossom Hill Road ® 5 percent will travel to /from the south via Los Gatos Boulevard ® 6 percent will travel to /from west via Los Gatos Saratoga Road ® 4 percent will travel to /from the west via Main Street • 4 percent will travel to /from the west via Mariposa Avenue The peak hour capacity of a multi -lane highway with a free flow speed of 35 mph or less is approximately 1,450 vehicles per hour per lane (vphpl) based on Highway Capacity Manual 2000 Edition. Based on the machine counts conducted in 2010, the highest peak hour (p.m. peak) the peak directional traffic flow (eastbound) on Towne Terrace is approximately 79 vph. With the Final — Riviera Terrace Apartments Expansion Traf fic Study Page I I May 10, 2010 TJ KM Transportation Consultants addition of approximately 23 p.m. peak hour inbound project trips (see Table III), the study segment is expected to remain within the acceptable capacity limits at LOS B. Similarly, the peak directional flow on University Avenue is approximately 385 vehicles per hour in the vicinity of the project. With the addition of approximately 13 peak hour trips, the study segment is expected operate acceptably at LOS B. Project Access and Circulation Currently, the access to Riviera Terrace. Apartments project: site is via Millbrae Lane and Rushmore Lane onto Riviera Drive, a private road for the Riviera Terrace Apartments:. Both Millbrae Lane and Rushmore IL me connect with Towne' Terrace. Addition of the project trips R is not expect to cause significant impacts on these streets It' "should be noted that Millbbrae, Lane and Rushmore Lane dead end at Riviera Drive; An emergency vehicle Would have to use the private road for turn- around. Currently, the apartment complex has 62 covered and 102 open surface -lot parkingspaces. With the proposed project expansion, an additional 89 covered and nine open surface -lot parking spaces are proposed. Thus, a total of 151 covered and 107 open surface -lot parking spaces are expected at the project build -out. Final — Riviera Terrace Apartments Expansion Traffic Study Page 12 May 10, 2010 Town of Los Gatos - Riviera Terrace Apartments Expansion Traffic Study Figure Project Trip Distribution and Assignment Assumptions 5 Intersection #I Intersection #2 Intersection #3 Intersection #4 University Ave. /Blossom Hill Rd. University Ave. /Roberts Rd. University Ave. /Andrews St, University Ave./Towne Terrace M 4 0 (1) f A 1V M CO r Intersection #5 University AveJChester St 6 %: 10 %� DA AVE. _ 4 0% er � F ARLEYRp m wES7 o BRUCEAVE• SHELL- w SURNE z W1 10 % m 3 q pOS 5% Intersection #6 ° qSh 1 eZOS ROB c� UnivemityAveJ < , m� E RAVF y aM NaL RD• R Ts Los Gatos - Sarato2 Rd. qNO� ye T ""RSro 2 Project Q �� 6 % BLS Q S7 � sr ROSERTS o R ° $ hUS Site MN � of 4 N N � �� F C "QTO S ` T °WNE rER lV lE� S RCF. 5 ORES? , FR ST A /NP 'Vie,. �• F qy 6 s m .A`' I �°.a, Traffic Signal s Stop Sign U93-113 - 2/2b1 U - VG TJKM Transportation Consultants Level of Service Analysis Figure 7 illustrates the Background plus Project turning movement volumes. The results of the LOS analysis are summarized in Table IV and detailed calculations are provided in Appendix E. With the addition of project trips, all the study intersections are expected to operate at essentially the same level of service as Background Conditions. Tnhln IV- Infnrcnrtinn 1 n, — 6arkurnund plus Protect Conditions Intersection Control A.M. Peak Hour P.M. Peak Hour Average Delay (sec/veh) LOS Average Delay:: (sec/veh) LOS I. University Avenue /Blossom Hill Road Signal 22.5 C 25.3 C 2. University Avenue /Roberts Road All -way Stop 10.8 B 11.1 B 3. University Avenue /Andrews Avenue All -way Stop 18.9 C 15.2 C 4. University Avenue /Towne Terrace One -way Stop 13.6 B 13.5 B S. University Avenue /Chester Street One -way Stop 12.2 B 13.1 B 6. University Avenue /Los Gatos Saratoga Road I. Signal 28.9 C 3$.1 D+ Note: uelay uveran average inLerJecU011 Uelay m WI r IJ -Wd ­ v .-VI IU VI - Intersections, or Minor street. (worst approach) delay for One -way or Two -way Stop Control Intersections; LOS Level of Service Page 14 Final — Riviera Terrace Apartments Expansion Traffic Study May 10, 2010 Town of Los Gatos - Riviera Terrace Apartments Expansion Traffic Study Figure Background Plus Project Conditions 6 Intersection #I Intersection #2 Intersection #3 Intersection #4 UniversityAveJBlossom Hill Rd. University AveJRoberts Rd. UniversityAveJAndrews St University AveJTowne Terrace rn h0 �s50(44 NCV 20 ( ,� oN Nn �. °r j (3gg � 41 6 �- tc-.9 6�45� 324 (3839) -A vt 148 16 (j� 49 (1 g 22 (28� M� 40 (S7) � N J C0 ° � rn �rn r r M M Intersection #5 Univ ersity Ave JChester St `^ DAVES yE. M � PARLEy Rb. O 18 1 m WEST 1 4 3 j SHELL_ w su gRU bEAVE Z E RNE p � 3 Intersection #6 UniversiityAveJ Los Gatos - Saratoga Rd. M� ^r �76' �2� 17¢S'��vy 4���35�(�96 (g) 1( -A R ) CO ro Hh Traffic Signal t Stop Sign TJKM Transportation Consultants Queuing Analysis TJ KM analyzed the traffic conditions for the future scenarios and forecasted the expected, qyquing/stacl(ing at the one-way stop control of the intersection, University Avenu6/Tow ' ne Terrace. Based on the HCM 2000 methodology using Traffix, analysis for the plus project conditions, a 95th percentile queue of one vehicle (6r.25 feet) is expected at the stop control approach of the intersectib'n'Univ"� Avenue /Towne Terrace. With the addition of proposed project trips, the queue is expected to remain at 25 feet. Q queuing results are' also provided in Appendix E. Pedestrian, Bicycle and Transit Accessibility Currently, there are sidewalks along both sides of University Avenue and Towne Te in the project vicinity. These sidewaks'are expected to be sufficient in handling pedestrian traffic;.. ge 4 '6rated by the project. Curreintly, there are no striped b R(flanes along University Avenue and Towne Teelracelrijhe vicinitybf the project site. � The bike'traffic would. share the roadway with motorized vehicles. This project is not expected to gen a significant volume of bicycle traffic that may cause significant "impact to the roadway capacity. Based on field observations, Bus L.i6e 48 (VTA . Valley Transportation Authority) runs along N. n" hesier Boulevard' vicinity of the proje� t site. The nearest bus S ih�a Cruz: Avenue and. W ar in,.t e. vic c stops for the pr oposed project site is Line -48-which is 16 cated.at the intersection of WSahta Cruz - Th e pr6jda is ex xpecte to ca ).�Venu Street. - 4,k pps&d' d significant impact to the transit ridership SWITRS Analyse i'i Based on the 2004 Accident Data on.�. California State Highways, the average statewide,.a.ccident rate for a four- ieggeci"suburba n signalize intersection is 0:5,8 accidents per million vehicles. The statewide average for i6burban"U'ris'ign"aflized intersection is.O. .34. n 611 LI ry Based '' ' o collis s i 8 n rb p o At:o btai n 68 fro m , Town staff fo r th I ast four r yea rs a n u a 1,2005- December 3 1, 2008) and the' x1sting'pbak hour turning movement counts, *the collision 'rates for below th statewide average to i all the.study intersections are h 11 sion rates. The summary of the acciderii'. for the study intersections are provided i]m Tab TnhIA V- Riimmqry of CnIlkinn Rafer% Inte ers c ion nt e t A&T Accident Rate Above Statewide Average? (Yes I No) 1. University Avenue/Blossom Hill Road 15,060 0.45 No 2. University Avenue/An8rews`Avenue 9,850 0.00 No 3. University Avenue/Lo s Gatos Saratoga Road 27,6 0.52 No Final = RiWe?a Terrace Apartments Expansion Traffic Study Page 16 May _10, 2010 r' S TJ KM Transportation Consultants Freeway Segment Analysis Based on 2006 Monitoring & Conformance Report by Santa Clara Congestion Management Program (CMP) April 2006, the freeway segment speed, volume, density and LOS information were analyzed for project impacts. Freeway segment analysis standards were obtained from Transportation Impact Analysis Guidelines (updated March 29, 2004) b Valley Transportation Authority CMP, For this traffic study, SR 17 freeway study segments are from Saratoga Avenue to Lark Avenue in both directions. It is estimated that the project would add traffic of less than one percent of the study freeway segment traffic during both the a.m. and the p.m. peak hours. Based on the CMP LOS criteria, there are no impacts at the study segments. The freeway segment analysis for the study segments of SR 17 are summarized in Table VI. o es, a existing year 2006 volumes and other related data were obtained from VTA staff during July 2007 Table VI: Summary of Freeway Segment Analysis Final — Riviera Terrace Apartments Expansion Traffic Study Page 17 May 10, 2010 Existing (Year 2006) Proposed Project Impact SR 17 Freeway ®irection Pear Average Project Study Segments Hour Lanes Speed Volume Density LOS Trips Density LOS Percent (mph) (veh) (pcpm (veh) (pcprnp1) Impact Bear Creek Road to a.m, 2 29 3830 66.0 F I 66.1 F 0.03% Los Gatos Saratoga NB p.m. 2 66 2770 21.0 C 3 21,0 C 0.11% Road Los Gatos Saratoga a.m, 2 66 2770 21.0 C 3 21.0 C 0.11% Road to Bear Creek SB p•m• 2 59 4370 37.0 D 2 37.1 D 0.05% Road Los Gatos Saratoga a.m. 1 2 47 4320 46.0 D 10 46.1 D 0.23% Road to Lark NB p.m. 2 65 3770 29.0 D 5 29.0 D 0.13% Avenue Lark Avenue to Los a.m. 2 66 3040 23.0 C 3 23.1 C 0.!30%J. Gatos Saratoga SB P.M. 2 47 4320 46.0 D 10 46.1 D 0. Road N t Th Table VI: Summary of Freeway Segment Analysis Final — Riviera Terrace Apartments Expansion Traffic Study Page 17 May 10, 2010 TJKM Transportation Consultants Intersection Control A.M. Peak H66r P.M. Peak Hour Average Delay (sec /veh) LOS Average Delay (sec /veh) LOS 1. University Avenue /Blossom Hill Road Signal 22.5 C 25.4 C 2. University Avenue /Roberts Road All -way Stop 10.9 B 11,2 B 3. University Avenue /Andrews Avenue All -way Stop 19.8 C 15.4 C 4. University Avenue /Towne Terrace One -way Stop 13.7 B 13.6 B 5, University Avenue /Chester Street One -way Stop 12.2 B 13,2 B 6. University Avenue /Los Gatos Saratoga Road Signal 29.2 C 38,3 D+ Background plus Project plus Pending Conditions' This Scenario evaluates future conditions with the addition of traffic from pending projects added to Background plus Project`traffic. ' The pending projects are foreseeable developments that are likely to add traffic to the study intersections. According to Town staff, the following developments are pending projects; I. 475-485 Alberto Way (medical- dental office building) 2 15405 Los,,Gatos Boulevard (office buildings replace an auto . 3 15928, Union ; Avenue, : (3- unit.single family- detached) 4. Placer Oaks (10 -unit residential'development) 5. 16213 Los Gatos Boulevard (commercial and residential development replaces auto dealership) 6. 416 N. Santa Cruz Avenue (a new bank replaces shopping center land use) 7 -,l 92 Los. Gatos Saratoga Road; (Chase bank evening hours. extension) 8.. 14966 Terrence.. De Flores (single family replaces Senior housing) These pending projects are expected to contribute a total of 378 vehicular trips during the a.m. peak hour and 373 vehicular trips during the p.m. peak hour on the Los Gatos street network. Level of Service Analysis Figure 7 summarizes..the Background. plus Project plus. Pending peak hour turning movement volumes and Table VII summarizes the results of the LOS analysis. The detailed LOS calculations are.contained in Appendix F. With the addition of the estimated pending project trips, all of the study intersections are expected to operate the same as Background plus Project Conditions. Table VII: Intersection LOS =_ Background + Project + Pending-Conditions Note: Delay = Overall average intersection delay in seconds for All -way Stop control Intersections, or Minor street (worst approach) delay for One -way or Two -way Stop Control intersections; LOS = Level of Service Page 18 Final — Riviera Terrace Apartments Expansion Traffic Study May 10, 2010 f Town of Los Gatos - Riviera Terrace Apartments Expansion Traffic Study Figure Background Plus Project Plus Pending Conditions 7 intersection #1 Intersection #2 Intersection #3 Intersection #4 University AveJBlossom Hill Rd, University Ave. /Roberts, Rd. University AveJAndrews St. University Ave./Towne Terrace mod.^ O�^� � J� 11 c: " ; ` M 15 p Nm 12 N � f 4 6 >3 f4 4Y ? 9 1 � 20 ()' 69 �96(4Sj 191 r 4114(41 34 p� 161 49106 ( 28 40 (S� N G 1061 10 N M Intersection #5 UniversityMeXhester St ro r D A� ESAV c, 1 J PARLEYRb lg � WEST 1413 N SHELL - BRUC U BURNS M e sg Intersection #6 University&eJ W ER TE0 �� 1 BOSS °� HaL t y �• s Los Gatos - Saratoga Rd. _ °� lvF81 z R� ���� gA y e Rsp °N 2 r iProject �i$e v° 3 HUB ° qI F 1 $9 co �`� ECL T >1 3 �� (6> 2 3$ 89 (82g CATO@ 4 TaYNER V IERA RD. 4 '1521 vy (379 J e & ° HEs 2 (92 Traffic Signal z Stop Sign _j L 1 1 I -uaa -i I s - uzonu - w TJ KM Transportation Consultants Conclusions TJKM has reached the following conclusions regarding the proposed Riviera Terrace Apartments expansion project at 135 Riviera Drive in the Town of Los Gatos: I. Based on the trip generation rates provided in the ITE Trip Generation Manual (8th edition), the proposed project expansion is estimated to add 372 daily trips with 29 trips occurring during the a.m. peak hour and 35 trips occurring during the p.m. peak hour. 2. All study intersections operate at an acceptable level of service (LOS) of D or better under existing conditions. With the addition of project trips, all the study intersections are expected to continue to operate acceptably (LOS D or better) during both the peal- hours. Similarly, all the study intersections are to operate acceptably for the future study scenarios. 3. Based on the HCM 2000, methodology using Traffix analysis for the plus project conditions, a 95th percendil ueue_ of one vehicle (or 25 feet) is expected at the stop control approach of the intersection University Avenue /Towne Terrace. With the addition of proposed project trips, the queue is expected to remain at 25 feet. 4. Based on the machine counts conducted in 2010, the highest peak hour (p.m. peak) the peak directional traffic flow'(eastbound) on Towne Terrace is approximately 79 vph. With the addition of approximately 23 p.m. peak hour inbound project trips, the study segment is expected to remain wIthir' the acceptable capacity limits at LOS B. Similarly , peak ; the directional flovv on University Avenue is approximately 385 vehicles per hour in the..., vicinity `of the project. With,.the addition of approximately 13 peak�hour trips, the study segment is expected operate acceptably at LOS B. 5. TJKM recommends instal lation'of a raised pork -chop Island with ADA access for replacing the existing striped pork chop island on westbound approach of Towne Terrace at University Avenue for improving the safety of crossing pedestrians and the turning vehicles. This pork -chop Island separates westbound left -turn and right-turn_ movements. 6. It should be noted that Milllbrae_ Lane and Rushmore Lane dead end at Riviera Drive, a private road for the Riviera Terrace Apartments: An emergency vehicle would have to use the private road for turn - around'. Final - Riviera Terrace Apartments Expansion Traffic Study Page 20 May 10, 2010 r % TJKM Transportation Consultants Study Participants and References TJKM Personnel Rich Haygood, P.E., T.E. Vishnu Gandluru Geri Foley Margie Pfaff Others Jessy Pu, P.E. References Project Manager Project Engineer Graphic Designer Word Processor Traffic Engineer, Town of Los Gatos ITE Trip Generation Manual, 8th Edition, 2003 Traffic Level of Service Analysis Guidelines: Congestion Management Program, Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority, 2003 Final — Riviera Terrace Apartments Expansion Traffic Study Page 21 May 10, 2010 TJKM Transportation Consultants f DESCRIPTION OF SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION CAPACITY ANALYSIS Updated 2000 HCM METHOD Background The operations method of intersection capacity analysis found in Chapter 16, "Signalized Intersections," of the Highway Capacity Manual 2000, Transportation Research Board, was used for this study. This method is used in most analyses of existing conditions or of future situations in which traffic, geometric, and control parameters were well established by projections and trial designs. This method addresses the capacity and level of service of intersection approaches, and the level of service of the intersection as a whole. In this method, capacity and level of service are evaluated separately, and are not related to each other in a simple one -to -one fashion. Capacity is evaluated in terms of the ratio of demand flow rate to capacity (volume -to- capacity ratio), while level of service is evaluated on the basis of control delay per vehicle (sec /veh). The capacity of the intersection as a whole is not addressed by this method; the design and signalization of intersections focuses on the accommodation of the major movements and approaches comprising the intersection. Capacity is, therefore, only meaningful as applied to these major movements and approaches. Capacity analysis results in the computation of volume - to- capacity ratios for individual movements and a composite volume -to- capacity ratio for the sum of critical movements or lane groups within the intersection. The volume -to- capacity ratio is the actual or projected rate of flow on an approach or designated group of lanes during a peak 15- minute interval divided by the capacity of the approach or designated group of lanes. Level of Service Level of service is based on the control delay per vehicle for various movements within the intersection. While volume -to- capacity affects delay, there are other parameters that more strongly affect it, such as the quality of progression, length of green phases, cycle lengths, and others. Thus for any given volume -to- capacity ratio, a range of delay values my result, and vice - versa. See the table "Level of Service Criteria for Signalized Intersections" for the relationship between the level of service and stopped delay per vehicle. Because delay is a complex measure, its relationship to capacity is also complex. It is possible, for example, to have delays in the range of Level of Service F while the volume -to- capacity ratios is below 1.00, perhaps as slow as 0.75 -0.85. Very high delays can occur at such volume -to- capacity ratios when some combination of the following conditions exists: the cycle length is long; the lane group in question has a long red time; and/or the signal progression for the subject movement is poor. The reverse is also possible. A saturated approach or lane group with a volume -to- capacity equal to 1.00 may have low delays if the cycle length is short, and/or the signal progression is favorable for the subject movement. Acceptable delay levels do not automatically ensure that capacity is sufficient. The analysis must consider the results of the capacity analysis module and the level of service module to obtain a complete picture of existing or projected intersection operations. c: \tjkm \templates \appendices- pleasanton office \sign, method 2000.doc 07/17/02 Thus, the designation of Level of Service does not automatically imply that the intersection, approach, or lane group is overloaded, nor does a level of service in the A to E range automatically imply that there is unused capacity available. The procedures of this methodology require the analysis of both capacity and level of service conditions to fully evaluate the operation of a signalized intersection. Input Data The input data necessary to use this methodology are: • Lane geometries • Traffic volumes • ` Signa muhk • Vehicle type distribution • Percent grade • Pedestrians • Peak hour factors • Parking activity • Arrival type per approach Reference: Highway Capacity Manual, Special Repa No. 209, Transportation Research Board, 2000. c: \tjkm \templates \appendices - pleasanton office \sip. method 2000.doc 07/17/02 Table A -l: Level of Service Criteria for Signalized Intersections Level of Service Type of Flow Delay Maneuverability Control Delay/ Vehicle s /veh A Stable Very slight delay. Progression is very Turning movements are easily made, _< 10.0 Flow favorable, with most vehicles arriving and nearly all drivers find freedom of during the green phase and not operation. stopping at all. B Stable Good progression and/or short cycle Vehicle platoons are formed. Many > 10 -20 Flow lengths. More vehicles stop than for drivers begin to feel somewhat LOS A, causing higher levels of restricted within groups of vehicles. average delay. C Stable Flow Higher delays resulting from fair Back -ups may develop behind turning > 20 -35 progression and/or longer cycle vehicles. Most drivers feel somewhat lengths. Individual cycle failures may restricted. begin to appear at this level. The number of vehicles stopping is significant, although many still pass through the intersection without stopping. D Approaching The influence of congestion becomes Maneuverability is severely limited > 35 -55 Unstable Flow more noticeable. Longer delays may during short periods due to temporary result in some combination of back ups. unfavorable progression, long cycle lengths, or high volume -to- capacity ratios. Many vehicles stop, and the proportion of vehicles not stopping declines. Individual cycle failures are noticeable. E Unstable Flow Generally considered to be the limit of There are typically long queues of > 55 -80 acceptable delay. Indicative of poor vehicles waiting upstream of the progression, long cycle lengths, and intersection. high volume -to- capacity ratios. Individual cycle failures are frequent occurrences. F Forced Flow Generally considered to be Jammed conditions. Backups from > 80 unacceptable to most drivers, Often other locations restrict or prevent occurs with oversaturation. May also movement. Volumes may vary widely, occur at high volume -to- capacity depending principally on the ratios. There are many individual downstream back -up conditions. cycle failures. Poor progression and long cycle lengths may also be major contributing factors. References: Highway Capacity Manual, Special Report No. 209, Transportation Research Board, 2000. Highway Capacity Manual, Special Report No. 87, Highway Research Board, 1965. TJKM. c: \t lun \templates \appendices- pleasanton office \los criteria 2000.doc 07/17/02 DESCRIPTION OF INTERSECTION CAPACITY ANALYSIS UNSIGNALIZED 2000 METHOD Background The method of unsignalized intersection capacity analysis used in this study is from Chapter 17, "Unsignalized Intersections" of the Highway Capacity Manual, Special report No. 209, Transportation Research Board, updated October 2000. This method applies to two -way STOP sign or YIELD sign controlled intersections (or one -way STOP sign or YIELD sign controlled intersections at three-way intersections). At such intersections, drivers on the minor street are forced to use judgeinent when selecting gaps in the major flow through which to execute crossings or turnrrig`raaneuvers: Thus, the capacity of the controlled legs of an intersection is based on three factors: 1. 'The distribution of gaps in the major street traffic stream. 2. Driver judgement in selecting gaps through which to'execute their desired maneuvers. 3. Follow -up time required to move into the front -of- queue position. It is assumed that gaps in the traffic stream are randomly distributed. For this reason, the methodology will be less reliable in situations in which the conflicting flows are strongly platooned, as would be the case at many urban intersections where the major street is part of a signalized network. - This method assumes that major street traffic is not affected by minor street flows. This assumption is generally good for periods when the operation is smooth and uncongested. (When congestion occurs, it is likely that major street traffic will experiencesome impedance due to minor street traffic.) Left turns from the major street are assumed to be affected by the opposing major street flow, and minor street traffic is affected by all conflicting movements. Input Data The general procedure to calculate the level of service is as follows: 1. Define existing geometric and volume' conditions for the intersection under study. 2. Determine the conflicting traffic through which each minor street movement and the major street left -turn must cross. 3, Determine the size of the gap in the conflicting traffic stream needed by vehicles in each movement crossing the conflicting traffic stream. 4. Determine the capacity of the gaps in the major traffic stream to accommodate each of the subject movements that will utilize these gaps. 5. Adjust the capacities found to account for impedance and the use of shared lanes. 6. Estimate the average total delay for each of the subject movements and determine the level of service for each movement and for the intersection. Gaps are utilized by vehicles in the following priority order: c: \tjkm\ templates \appendices- pleasanton office \unsig, method 2000.doc 07/17/2002 r ,. f 1. Right turns from the minor street 2. Left turns from the major street 3. Through movements from the minor street 4. Left turns from the minor street For example, if a left - turning vehicle on the major street and a through vehicle from the minor street are waiting to cross the major traffic stream, the first available gap of acceptable size would be taken by the left- turning vehicle. The minor street through vehicle must wait for the second available gap. In aggregate terms, a large number of such left - turning vehicles could use up so many of the available gaps that minor street through vehicles are severely impeded or unable to make safe crossing movements. Level of Service See the following table "Level of Service Criteria for Unsignalized Intersections" for the relationship between delay and level of service. LEVEL OF SERVICE CRITERIA FOR UNSIGNALIZED ITNERSECTIONS Control Delay (s /veh) Level of Service Delays 0 -10 A :Little or no delay > 10 -15 s /veh B Short traffic delays > 15 -25 s /veh C Average traffic delays > 25 -35 s /veh D Long traffic delays >35 -50 s /veh E Very long traffic delays > 50 s /veh F Extreme traffic delay The level of service criteria for Two -Way STOP controlled intersections is somewhat different from the criteria used in Chapter 16 for signalized intersections. The primary reason for this is the difference that drivers expect a signalized intersection to carry higher traffic volumes than unsignalized intersections. Additionally, several driver behavior conditions combine to snake delays at signalized intersections less onerous than at unsignalized intersections. Reference: Highway Capacity Manual, Special Report 209, Transportation Research Board, Update October 2000. c: \tj \templates \appendices- pleasanton office \unsig, method2000.doc 07/17/2002 TJKM Transportation Consultants t Speed Report - Prepared by: NDS /ATD University Avenue north of Towne Terrace Los Gatos , Project #: 10- 7036 -001s Date: 2/8/2010 MONDAY South Bound Begin 5- 15- 20- 25- 30- 35- 40- 45- 50- 55- 60- 65- 70- Time 14 19 24 29 34 39 44 49 54 59 64 69 9999 Total 12:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hour Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hour Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 :15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hour Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 '•30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hour Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hour Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hour Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hour Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7:45 AM 0 D 0 0 0 0 0. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hour Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8: 00 am O o O n n n n o n 0 0 n n o 8: 15 my 0 o n 0 o o o n o 0 o n n 8: 30 mm O 0 n o n o 8 o o n n O o o o: 4s AM o n n o o o n o o o n o o n 9:O0 Am o n o n n 0 n o o 0 O 0 o _ o 9'1s AM O 0 n n n o o 0 0 n o n o n 9: 30 aa 0 O n 0 o 0 O o o 0 o O o o y: 4s mm n o o o n o n n o o n o o n -'-_ Tot ~~ 0 0 ' ' _ - 18:00 AM 0 o o 0 o n O O 0 n o 0 n O 10: 15 ao V 0 o 0 O 8 n o O 0 o O n 0 10: 30 AM o 0 0 O O O o o o O n 0 O o zo:«o AM o o o n n o o o u o n o o n 11:00 AM O n O n o o o O O n n o o o zl:ls my 0 0 0 n o n O 0 o O 0 0 o o zl:so Am n o n 0 O O o o o O 0 0 o n zz:*s AM n n o o o o o o n o o o n o 12:00 PM 0 n 0 u o n o 0 o n o n o n 12'15 ma n 0 o n o o o n O 0 o o n o 12:30 PM O o O n o n o n n o n o o o zu:«s em o n o n o o o o o o n o o o ( Hour Total 0 o- n o o o _ n n � ^u o o o o n \ l:On PM n O n o n n o o o o u o O o z:zo am n n o n n 0 n O u O n o o n z:sn PM O o n o 0 o n o n n o o n 0 z:*u Pm n o. n o o n o o n o u n o o 2: 00 PM 0 o o o 0 o n n o n 0 0 n o 2:15 em o o O n o n o n O o o o o o z:so my O n n o O O o o n o n o n o o:«s pm o o o o o o o n o o n n o u 3:00 em O 0 0 n 0 0 n 0 o o n n o o 3:15 PM o o* O n 0 u n n 0 O n n n o 3:30 PM o O O n o o n o O n o O n O a:os sa n o o o o o o n o o o o o o Hour Total 0 - 0 -- �- 0 ' - A PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 :45 IM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hour Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hour Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6:15 PM 0 2 6 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 6:30 PM 3 8 18 23 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 57 6:45 PM 0 7 19 22 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 49 Hour Total 3 17 43 53 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 122 7:00 PM 2 6 15 22 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 49 7:15 PM 0 7 11 19 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 39 7:30 PM 1 9 12 11 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 37 7:45 PM 3 3 14 12 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 35 Hour Total 6 25 52 64 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 160 8:00 PM 0 9 11 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 31 8:15 PM 0 2 18 8 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 29 8:30 PM 0 2 20 11 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 34 45 PM i 0 5 7 7 0 1 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 20 ar Total 0 18 56 37 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 114 9:00 PM 3 6 10 9 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 9:15 PM 0 1 13 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 9:30 PM 0 5 11 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 9:45 PM 0 0 3 5 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 Hour Total 3 12 37 21 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 78 10:00 PM 0 3 7 4 2 1 0 0 0. 0 0 0 0 17 10:15 PM 0 0 6 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 10:30 PM 0 1 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 10:45 PM 0 2 B 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 Hour Total 0 6 24 12 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 47 11:00 PM 0 1 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 11:15 PM 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 11:30 PM 0 1 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 11:45 PM 0 1 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 Hour Total 0 3 11 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 Totals 12 81 223 195 29 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 543 Speed Report - Prepared by: NDS /ATD University Avenue north of Towne Terrace Los Gatos Project #: 10- 7036 -001s Date: 2/8/2010 South Bound Speed Statistics 15th Percentile Speed 19 MPH Median Speed (50th percentile) 24 MPH Average Speed - All Vehicles 24 MPH 85th Percentile Speed 29 MPH 95th Percentile Speed 10 MPH Pace Speed Number of Vehicles in Percentage of Vehicles Number of Vehicles >= 25 Percentage of Vehicles 31 MPH 20 - 29 MPH Pace 418 in Pace 76.98% MPH 227 >= 25 MPH 41.80% Prepared by NDS /ATD 2/8/2010 City: Los Gatos Project #: 10-7036-001s Location: University Avenue north of Towne Terrace Start Southbound Hour Totals Northbound Hour Totals Combined Totals Time Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon 12:00 0 0 0 0 12:18 0 0 0 0 12:30 0 0 0 0 12:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1:00 0 0 0 0 1:15 0 0 0 0 1:30 0 0 0 0 1:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2:00 0 0 0 0 2:15 0 0 0 0 2:30 0 0 0 0 2:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3:00 0 0 0 0 3:15 0 0 0 0 3:30 0 0 0 0 3:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4:00 0 0 0 0 4:15 0 0 0 0 4:30 0 0 0 0 4:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5:00 0 0 0 0 5:15 0 0 0 0 5:30 0 0 0 0 5:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6:00 0 0 0 0 6:15 0 16 0 0 6:30 0 57 0 0 6:45 0 49 0 122 0 0 0 0 0 122 7:00 0 49 0 0 7:15 0 39 0 0 7:30 0 37 0 0 7:45 0 35 0 160 0 0 0 0 0 160 8:00 0 31 0 0 8:15 0 29 0 0 8:30 0 34 0 0 8:45 A 20 0 114 0 0 0 0 0 114 9:00 0 30 0 0 9 :15 0 17 0 0 9:30 0 21 0 0 9:45 0 10 0 78 0 0 0 0 0 78 10:00 0 17 0 0 10:15 0 10 0 0 .10:30 0 7 0 0 10:45 0 13 0 47 0 0 0 0 0 47 11:00 0 7 0 0 11:15 0 3 0 0 11:30 0 6 0 0 11:45 0 6 0 22 0 0 0 0 0 22 Total 0 543 0 543 0 0 0 0 0 543 Combined 543 543 0 0 543 Total AM Peak Vol. P.H.F. PM Peak 6:30 PM Vol. 194 P.H.F. 0.851 Percentage 0.0% 100.0% #DIV /0I #DIV /01 c, Speed Report - Prepared by: NDS /ATD University Avenue north of Towne Terrace Los Gatos Project: 10- 7036 -001s Date: 2/9/2010 TUESDAY South Bound Begin 5- 15- 20- 25- 30- 35- 40- 45- 50- 55- 60- 65- 70- Time 14 19 24 29 34 39 44 49 54 59 64 69 9999 Total 12:00 AM 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 12:15 AM 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 12:30 AM 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 12:45 AM 0 3 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 Hour Total 1 5 5 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 1:00 AM 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 1:15 AM 0 0 0. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0_ 0 0 0 1:30 AM 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 1 1:45 AM 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Hour Total 1 0 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 2:00 AM 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2:15 AM 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2:30 AM 0 0 1 0 0 0, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hour Total 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 3:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3:15 AM 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 3:30 AM 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 3:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hour Total 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 4:00 AM 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 4:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4:30 AM 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 4:45 AM 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Hour Total .0 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 5:00 AM 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 5 :15 AM 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 5:30 AM 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 5:45 AM 0 1 2 3 1 0 0 0. 0 0- 0 0 0 7 Hour Total 0 1 4 8 1 0 0 0 0 0' 0 0 0 14 6:00 AM 0 0 5 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 6:15 AM 0 0 2 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 6:30 AM 0 0 3 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 6 :45 AM 0 2 5 10 4 0- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 Hour Total 0 2 15 27 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 48 7:00 AM 1 1 11 12 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 7:15 AM 0 2 14 19 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 39 7:30 AM 0 3 20 28 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0. 58 7:45 AM 0 1 18 35 9 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 64 Hour Total 1 7 63 94 19 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 188 F� :00 AM 0 0 13 28 15 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 57 8:15 AM 0 2 22 35 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 67 8:30 AM 3 4 14 17 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 48 8:45 AM 2 4 19 35 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 65 Hour Total 5 10 68 115 38 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 237 9:00 AM 1. 5 12 22 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 47 9:15 AM 0 6 18 30 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 61 9:30 AM 2 7 23 26 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 63 9:45 AM 0 1 26 33 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 68 Hour Total 3 19 79 111 27 0 0 0 0 :0 0 0 0 239 10:00 AM 4 5 20 29 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 64 10:15 AM 1 1 20 37 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 60 10:30 AM 2 1 13 27 7 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 52 10:45 AM 5 0 21 22 7 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 57 Hour Total 12 7 74 115 21 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 233 11:00 AM 0 1 17 32 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 60 11:15 AM 0 4 22 33 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 70 11:30 AM 3 10 26 26 8 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 75 11:45 AM 1 2 34 37 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 81 Hour Total 4 17 99 128 36 2 0 0 0 0 0 - 00 286 12:00 PM 1 10 29 36 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 85 12:15 PM 1 8 19 37 9 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 75 12:30 PM 0 7 21 33 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 71 1 2:45 PM 0 2 20 33 9 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 65 )ur Total 2 27 89 139 37 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 296 1:00 PM 0 5 19 24 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 57 1:15 PM 7 3 19 18 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 54 1:30 PM 1 3 32 25 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 67 1:45 PM 0 5 18 36 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 63 Hour Total 8 16 88 103 25 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 241 2:00 PM 3 6 25 31 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 76 2:15 PM 1 13 26 32 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 78 2:30 PM 0 6 22 41 8 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 79 2:45 PM 0 0 35 62 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 106 Hour Total 4 25 108 166 34 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 339 3:00 PM 2 14 50 42 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 115 3:15 PM 1 10 29 . 33 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 79 3:30 PM 2 6 30 34 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 77 3:45 PM 1 11 25 41 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 85 Hour Total 6 41 134 150 25 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 356 «:0n PM l o sl ss 17 O o o 0 n o o O 87 ` *:ls mu n zn zo 37 s z n 0 o o o o n 83 « so em l n cA «c zz l 0 O n o n n o 87 O o o o o n zuz 5: 00 em z 14 33 52 y 0 o o 0 o n O 0 109 5:15 pm O y 41 43 12 O n o n 0 o o 0 105 s:zn PM 3 7 oo m s o o O o n n n n zOO Q. o o U o U n ox 6:00 PM 3 oo 29 28 5 o 0 U O o 0 o o pO 0:15 rm z 8 43 ze 6 l 0 0 O n U n o no s: 30 em z 2 23 21 o o n O o O o o 0 no 68 Hour Total 8 48 123 91 24 2 V o o o o o o 296 7:0o nm O s 24 19 5 0 n o o O 0 n o 53 7:15 mo 3 6 %s oz o o 0 O 8 n 0 o o 55 7:3O em o s 14 s s o n n 0 o 0 0 O ss 0 4 O O o o 46 o:no PM p 14 20 o 0 o o n O o n n nV 8:15 em . 2 n 1 zo cI u o n 0 n o o n n ux n:ao em l o zc 11 l 1 o n n o o n n zu 8:45 / Hour Total 3 14 56 60 10 1 o n o o o o n 144 9:00 PM n z 10 o n o n o 0 n n n o 18 y:In em n z 12 o 1 O n o o Q n n .0 us 9:30 mn z 4 s o z O o o n o n 0 n 16' zo:on Pm z n y ln I o o o 0 0 o O n 29 10:15 em o a a s n n o o 0 n n n n 11 zO:nn PM 0 5 3 4 0 o O n o 0 n n o 12 o_ 0 11:00 PM n 1 « 4 o o o 0 O O o 0 n y 11:15 PM u o o u n 0 0 n o n O 0 n o 11:30 Pm o n o 2 o 0 n U o n o n n « 11:45 PM 1 1 '2 O o 0 Totals 78 350 1428 1773 401 22 o n o n o n u 4052 Speed Report - Prepared by: NDS /ATD University Avenue north of Towne Terrace Los Gatos Project #: 10- 7036 -001s Date: 2/9/2010 South Bound Speed Statistics. 15th Percentile Speed Median Speed (50th percentile) Average Speed - All Vehicles 85th Percentile Speed 95th Percentile Speed 10 MPH Pace Speed Number of Vehicles in Pace Percentage of Vehicles in Pace Number of Vehicles >= 25 MPH Percentage of Vehicles >= 25 MPH 21 MPH 25 MPH 25 MPH 29 MPH 33 MPH 20 - 29 MPH 3201 79.00% 2196 54.20% F Prepared by NDS/ATD 2/9/2010 City: Los Gatos Project #: 10-7036-001S Location: University Avenue north of Towne Terrace Start Southbound Hour Totals Northbound Hour Totals Combined Totals Time Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon 12:00 4 85 0 0 12:15 2 75 0 0 12:30 2 71 0 0 12:45 5 65 13 296 0 0 0 0 13 296 1:00 4 57 0 0 1:15 0 54 0 0 1:30 1 67 0 0 1:45 1 63 6 241 0 0 0 0 6 241 2:00 1 76 0 0 2:15 1 78 0 0 2:30 1 79 0 0 2:45 0 106 3 339 0 0 0 0 3 339 3:00 0 115 0 0 3:15 1 79 0 0 3!30 2 77 0 0 3:45 0 85 3 356 0 0 0 0 3 356 4.00 ' 2 87 0 0 4:15: 0 83 A 0 426 1 87 0 0 4:45 1 101 4 358 0 0 0 0 4 358 5:00 1 109 0 0 5:15 3 105 0 0 5:30 3 100 0 0 5:45 7 92 14 406 0 0 0 0 14 406 6:00 8 90 0 0 6:15 8 88 0 0 6:30 11 50 0 0 6:45 21 68 48 296 0 0 0 '0 48 296 7:00 27 53 0 0 7:15 39 55 0 0 7:30 58 33 0 0 7:45 64 46 188 187 0 0 0 0 188 187 8:00 57 50 0 0 8:15 67 42 0 0 8:30 48 28 0 0 8:45 65 24 237 144 0 0 0 0 237 144 9:00 47 18 0 0 9:15 61 23 0 0 9:30 63 16 0 0 9:45 68 16 239 73 0 0 0 0 239 73 10:00 64 29 0 0 10:15 60 11 0 0 10:30 52 12 0 0 10:45 57 7 233 59 0 0 0 0 233 59 11:00 60 9 0 0 11:15 70 5 0 0 11:30 75 4 0 0 11:45 81 6 286 23 0 0 0 0 286 23 Total 1274 2778 1274 2778 0 0 0 0 1274 2778 Combined 4052 4052 0 0 4052 Total AM Peak 11:30 AM Vol. 316 P.H.F. 0.929 PM Peak 4:45 PM Vol. 415 P, H. F. 0.952 Percentage 31.4% 68.6% #DIV/01 #DIV/01 t Speed Report - Prepared by: NDS /ATD University Avenue north of Towne Terrace Los Gatos Project #: 10- 7036 -001s Date: 2/10/2010 WEDNESDAY South Bound Begin Time 5- 14 15- 19 20- 24 25- 29 30- 34 35- 39 40- 44 45- 49 50- 54 55- 59 60- 64 65- 69 70- 9999 Total 12 ;00 AM 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 12:15 AM 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 12 :30 AM 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 12; 4 5 AM 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Hour Total 0 2 4 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 1 :00 AM 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1:15 AM 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1:30 AM 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1:4 5 AM 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 Hour Total 0 1 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 2:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Q 0 0 0 0 0 0 2:15 AM 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2:45 AM 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Hour Total 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 3:00 AM 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 3:15 AM 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 x:30 AM 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 i 45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 aour Total 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 4:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4:30 AM 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 4:45 AM 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 Hour Total 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 5:00 AM 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 5:15 AM 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 5:30 AM 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 5: 4 5 AM 1 2 0 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 Hour Total 1 2 1 10 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 6:00 AM 0 0 5 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 6:15 AM 0 0 2 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 6:30 AM 0 1 2 7 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 6:45 AM 0 1 8 9 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 Hour Total 0 2 17 26 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 49 7:00 AM 0 2 5 6 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 7:15 AM 2 3 10 22 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 42 7:30 AM 0 1 13 33 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 58 7:45 AM 1 2 32 39 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 81 Hour Total 3 8 60 100 26 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 197 8:0O am o a zo 19 6 o n n n u o o 8 »n 8: 15 am u 2 zV 36 o n n o n o 0 O 0 70 n sO om 0 n uz 27 o n O O o o o o n se nms AM n 2 o o« 11 o o n o o o o o �4 9: 00 AM 1 3 ly 24 _3 l _O 0 o o o O . 0 51 9: 15 AM a J oz 28 z n n o O o O 0 o 57 9: 30 mn u % zs on 8 O 0 0 o O n O o ss 0 3 o o O 0 0 n n n 48 10: 00 AM O s 13 33 14 ` n O n 0 0 0 O O 63 10: 15 AM l * D zo 5 0 O n n 8 0 O 0 39 10: 30 AM l 6 ul 23 s 0 o O o 0 o O 0 57 10: 45 AM l s za so n n o n o o o o o ss Hour Total 3_ _+ +~ ._+y� ^" -- `^''- ^-- x'' '" `- --` —~~- `-- --`' 11:00 am 3 2 33 17 s l o o O n O u O 61 Il:zs um l o oz 28 s 0 O n o n o o o sU 11:30 am 0 c oy az o n o 0 o O o o n 80 zz:«o AM z 4 29 m 8 l u n O 0 0 o 0 yo 12:00 PM l l zo sn 10 o o o O 0 o 0 n oo 12:15 aa * s co 37 s o 0 o 0 n o 0 o 79 1250 Pm 1 6 17 ao 8 O o n o n n o o m zc:ua PM4 u s x* az o z o O n o n o o 71 / \ 1:00 mn n « zz 28 s n n o o o n 8 n su z:zo nm o s xy 19 4 A o o 0 n 0 o n 59 z:sn PM o 3 se ss « o n O n O o O o 78 1:45 PM n s 37 34 * o o n n n 0 o o nx ~~.^ Tota 1 ' - - e:nn em 5 6 24 26 l u o o o n o o o so x.ls Po o 7 18 sz o 0 O n 0 n o O O 66 2:30 ay z o 21 oy 4 n o O n 0 o o o su z:oo po V o zx 41 a z 0 o n o o 0 n 82 3:00 PM l 9 as oa 8 O 8 o o o n o O 97 5:15 em u 4 zy 37 7 1 O o 0 o 0 o o 00 s:so Pm l s «s 37 7 l 0 n o O o 0 n 96 s'os Pm 0 1 22 53 10 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 87 00 PM 0 11 25 47 7 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 91 4:15 PM 2 6 31 44 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 93 4:30 PM 2 4 27 40 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 77 4:45 PM 1 14 32 32 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 83 Hour Total 5 35 115 163 25 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 344 5: 00 PM 0 6 46 39 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 104 5:15 PM 2 21 35 38 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 103 5:30 PM 4 9 39 29 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 91 5:45 PM 1 14 36 34 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 91 Hour Total 7 50 156 140 36 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 389 6:00 PM 1 7 28 45 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 89 6 :15 PM 1 10 32 41 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 93 6:30 PM 0 4 27 22 7 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 63 6:45 PM 1 11 30 27 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 72 Hour Total 3 32 117 135 27 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 317 7:00 PM 0 6 15 25 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 55 7:15 PM 2 7 24 17 9 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 60 7:30 PM 1 2 21 15 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 44 7:45 PM 1 9 10 11 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 35 Hour Total 4 24 70 68 27 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 194 8:00 PM 2 4 15 14 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 36 8 :15 PM 0 4 9 16 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 32 8:30 PM 1 4 12 9 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 0 :45 PM 2 2 14 15 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 34 ur Total 5 14 50 54 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 132 9:00 PM 1 3 6 10 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 9:15 PM 0 3 18 4 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 9:30 PM 0 3 5 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 9:45 PM 0 9 8 6 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 Hour Total 1 18 37 24 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 89 10:00 PM 0 4 17 6 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 29 10:15 PM 0 0 7 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 10 :30 PM 0 1 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 10:45 PM 0 0 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 Hour Total 0 5 31 12 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 52 11:00 PM 0 2 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 11:15 PM 0 1 1 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 11:30 PM 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 11:45 PM 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 Hour Total 0 4 9 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 Totals 62 322 1433 1756 373 21 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3967 Speed Report - Prepared by: NDS/ATD University Avenue north of Towne Terrace Los Gatos Project #: 10-7036-001s Date: 2/10/2010, South Bound Sneed Statistic I 15th Percentile Speed 21 MPH Median Speed (50th percentile) 25 MPH Average Speed All Vehicles 25 MPH 85th Percentile Speed 29 MPH 95th Percentile Speed 33 MPH 10 MPH Pace Speed 20 29 MPH Number of.-Vehicles Pace 3189 Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 80.39% Number of Vehicles >= 25 MPH 2150 Percentage of Vehicles >= 25 MPH 54.20% r ` Prepared by NDS /ATD 2110/2010 City: Los Gatos Project #: 10-7036-001s Location: University Avenue north of Towne Terrace Start Southbound Hour Totals Northbound Hour Totals Combined Totals Time Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon 12:00 3 86 0 0 12:15 3 79 0 0 12:30 3 67 0 0 12:45 1 71 10 303 0 0 0 0 10 303 1:00 1 58 0 0 1:15 1 59 0 0 1:30 1 78 0 0 1:45 2 83 5 278 0 0 0 0 5 278 2:00 0 62 0 0 2:15 1 66 0 0 2:30 0 60 0 0 2:45 1 82 2 270 0 0 0 0 2 270 3:00 1 97 0 0 3:15 1 80 0 0 3:30 1 96 0 0 3:45 0 87 3 360 0 0 0 0 3 360 4:00 0 91 0 0 4:15 0 93 0 0 4:30 1 77 0 0 4:45 2 83 3 344 0 0 0 0 3 344 5:00 2 104 0 0 5:15 3 103 0 0 5:30 2 91 0 0 5:45 9 91 16 389 0 0 0 0 16 389 6:00 8 89 0 0 6:15 9 93 0 0 6:30 11 63 0 0 6:45 21 72 49 317 0 0 0 0 49 317 7:00 16 55 0 0 7:15 42 60 0 0 7:30 58 44 0 0 7:45 81 35 197 194 0 0 0 0 197 194 8:00 38 36 0 0 8:15 70 32 0 0 8:30 59 30 0 0 8:45 74 34 241 132 0 0 0 0 241 132 9:00 51 22 0 0 9:15 57 27 0 0 9:30 55 13 0 0 9:45 48 27 211 89 0 0 0 0 211 89 10:00 63 29 0 0 10:15 39 12 0 0 10:30 57 5 0 0 10:45 55 6 214 52 0 0 0 0 214 52 11:00 61 6 0 0 11:15 60 6 0 0 11;30 60 2 0 0 11:45 90 3 271 17 0 0 0 0 271 17 1222 2745 0 0 0 0 1222 2745 Total 1222 2745 Combined 3967 3967 0 0 3967 Total AM Peak 11:45 AM Vol. 322 P.H.F. 0.894 PM Peak 5:00 PM Vol. 389 P.H.F. 0.935 Percentage 30.8% 69.2% #DIV /0! #DIV /01 Speed Report - Prepared by: NDS /ATD University Avenue north of Towne Terrace Los Gatos Project #: 10- 7036 -001s 0 0 1 South Bound 0 0 Date: 2/11/2010 0 THURSDAY 0 Begin 5- 15- 20- 25- 30- 35- 40- 45- 50- 55- 60- 65- 70- 0 Time 14 19 24 29 34 39 44 49 54 59 <. 64 69 9999 Total 0 12:00 AM 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 12:15 AM 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 12:30 AM 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 12:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0, 0 0 0 0 Hour Total 0 0 3 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1:00 AM 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.., 0 0 0 0 1: 30 AM 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 ._ 0 0 0 1 1: 4 5 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -< 0 0 0- 0 Hour Total 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2:15 AM 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2:30 AM 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2: 4 5 AM 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 Hour Total 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 3:00 AM 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 3 :15 AM 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 3 :30 AM 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 3:45 AM 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ' 0 1 Hour Total 0 0 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0. 0 0 0 0 4:30 AM 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0• 0 0 1 4:45 AM 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0- 0 0 1 Hour Total 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 `0 0 0 0 0 0 2 5:00 AM 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 5:15 AM 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 _0 0 0 -. 0 0 • 0 4 5:30 AM 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 5: 4 5 AM 0 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 Hour Total 1 2 7 3 1 0 0 0 0 0" 0 0 `0 14 6:00 AM 1 0 1 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 6:15 AM 0 1 4 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 6:30 AM 0 0 6 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 6:45 AM 0 0 5 10 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 Hour Total 1 1 16 24 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 47 7:00 AM 0 0 10 4 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 7:15 AM 0 1 12 29 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 49 7:30 AM 0 0 33 37 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 78 7:45 AM 1 5 14 30 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 53 Hour Total 1 6 69 100 18 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 196 :00 AM 1 0 22 25 7 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 56 8 :15 AM 2 2 16 36 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 61 8:30 AM 0 2 11 29 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 49 8:45 "AM 0 4 14 24 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 48 Hour Total 3 8 63 114 25 1 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 214 9:00 AM 1 3 20 21 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50 9:15 AM 1 8 23 16 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 57 9:30 AM 1 2 20 22 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 49 9:45 AM 2 1 16 41 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 66 Hour Total 5 14 79 100 24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ' 02 2 2 10:00 AM 2 4 20 35 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 65 10:15 AM 3 3 21 20 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 53 10:30 AM 2 5 26 29 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 65 10 :45 AM 0 6 27 21 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 59 Hour Total 7 18 94 105 17 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 242 11 :00 AM 3 4 22 32 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 65 11:15 AM 0 2 28 33 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 70 11:30 AM 2 6 25 37 7 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 79 11:45 AM 2 7 28 35 8 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 81 Hour Total 7 19 103 137 26 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 295 12:00 PM 0 8 30 41 9 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 89 12:15 PM 2 12 38 38 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 95 12:30 PM 0 7 25 37 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 77 12:45 PM 1 2 28 38 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 73 >ur Total 3 29 121 154 26 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 334 1:00 PM 3 3 25 34 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 74 1:15 PM 2 4 23 21 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 55 1:30 PM 1 4 21 33 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 64 1:45 PM 1 3 35 35 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 79 Hour Total 7 14 104 123 24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 272 2:00 PM 0 8 24 38 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 74 2:15 PM 5 3 28 24 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 67 2:30 PM 0 4 31 41 11 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 87 2:45 PM 0 5 25 46 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 85 Hour Total 5 20 108 149 31 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 313 3:00 PM 5 8 29 43 9 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 95 3:15 PM 0 4 30 46 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 85 3:30 PM 0 9 19 35 7 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 72 3:45 PM 1 4 31 47 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 89 Hour Total 6 25 109 171 27 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 341 4:00 PM 3 6 29 44 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 88 4:15 PM 3 9 46 44 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 106 4:30 PM 2 ll 41 43 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 101 4; 45 PM 1 7 35 44 9 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 99. Hour Total 9 33 151 175 23 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 394 5:00 PM 0 4 46 52 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 108 5;15 PM 5 21 39 38 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 108 5:30 PM 4 11 44 55 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 128 5:45 PM 0 8 49 _41... 1.1,_ ., ..,,_1,... - __ : 0 . ,..,,.0, .. 0. . Q 0 0 0 110 Hour Total 9 44 178 186 36 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 454 6:00 PM 1 12 30 37 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 90 6;15 PM 3 11 47 25 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 93 6 :30 PM 6 11 20 19 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 59 6:45 PM 0 .7. 21 _ 25 6_ 0. ,. 0,_ .__ ,.:. _- 0 -0. 0 0- 0 59 Hour Total 10 41 118 106 26 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 301 7:00 PM 1 12 23 20 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 59 7:15 PM 0 3 25 24 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 55 7:30 PM 1 7 20 8 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 38 7: 4 5 PM 0 4 11 10 2 0. 0 0. _.. ....0. .. 0._: _..,., 0 0 0 2 7 Hour Total 2 26 79 62 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 179 8:00 PM 2 4 20 15 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 44 8 :15 PM 1 10 14 17 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 44 8:30 PM 2 12 11 8 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 34 8:45 PM 1 7 13 15 2 0. _0:. Q. 0 _ 0 _0_ _ 0 0....: ._ _ 38 Hour Total 6 33 58 55 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 160 9:00 PM 0 4 11 9 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 9:15 PM 0 2 10 15 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 9:30 PM 0 2 11 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 9: 45 PM .. 0 3 10 7 0 0 0 0. ,., 0., . 0 0__ . ., 0 .:. 0..:. 20 Hour Total 0 11 42 37 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 95 10 :00 PM 1 6 9 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 10:15 PM 0 3 5 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 10 :30 PM 0 1 6 7 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 10:45 PM 0 2 4 2 1 0 0 . ... :0 .,._.. _ 0 0 ,. , 0 ...._. 0 . _ _ 0,.._,,. _ 9 . Hour Total 1 12 24 19 3 0 0 0 0. 0 0 0 0 59 11:00 PM 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 11:15 PM 0 3 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 11:30 PM 0 3 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 11:45 PM 1 2 3 4 0 0. 0 0 0 0., 0 0 0 10 Hour Total 1 10 6 6 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 Totals 84 366 1540 1833 339 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4177 l` Speed Report - Prepared by: NDS /ATD University Avenue north of Towne Terrace Los Gatos Project #: 10- 7036 -001s Date: 2/11/2010 South Hound Speed Statistic. 15th Percentile Speed Median Speed (50th percentile) Average Speed - All Vehicles 85th Percentile Speed 95th Percentile Speed 10 MPH Pace Speed Number of Vehicles in Pace Percentage of Vehicles in Pace Number of Vehicles >= 25 MPH Percentage of Vehicles >= 25 MPH 21" MPH 25 MPH 25 MPH 29 MPH 32 MPH 20 - 29 MPH 3373 80.75% 2187 52.36% Prepared by NDS/ATD 2/11/2010 City: Los Gatos Project #: 10-7036-001s Location: University Avenue north of Towne Terrace Start Southbound Hour Totals Northbound Hour Totals Combined Totals Time Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon 12:00 3 89 0 0 12:15 1 95 0 0 12:30 3 77 0 0 12:45 0 73 7 334 0 0 0 0 7 334 1:00 1 74 0 0 1:15 0 55 0 0 1:30 1 64 0 0 1:45 0 79 2 272 0 0 0 0 2 272 2:00 0 74 0 0 2:15 1 67 a 01 2:30 1 87 0 0 2:45 2 85 4 313 0 0 0 0 4 313 3ffl:,- 2 95 0 0 3:16 1 85 0 0 3!- .30; 1 72 0 0 3:4fk-- 1 89 5 341 01 0 0 0 5 341 4:00 0 88 0 0 4:i5_ 0 106 0 0 4:30 1 101 0 0 4:45 1 99 2 394 0 0 0 0 2 394 5:00 2 108 0 0 5:15 4 108 0 5:30 4 128 0 0 5:45 4 110 14 454 0 0 0 0 14 454 6:00 7 90 0 0 6:15 12 93 0 0 6:30 11 59 0 0 6:45 17 59 47 301 0 0 0 0 47 301 7:00 16 69 0 0 7:15 49 55 0 0 7:30 78 38 0 0 7:45 53 27 196 179 0 0 0 0 196 179 8:00 56 44 0 0 8:15 61 44 0 0 8:30 49 34 0 0 8:45 48 38 214 160 0 0 0 0 214 160 9:00 50 25 0 0 9:15 57 30 0 0 9:30 49 20 0 0 9:45 66 20 222 95 0 0 0 0 222 95 10:00 65 21 0 0 10:15 53 13 0 0 10:30 65 16 0 0 10:45 59 9 242 59 0 0 0 0 242 59 11:00 65 2 0 0 11:15 70 6 0 0 11:30 79 7 0 0 11:45 81 10 295 25 0 0 0 0 295 25 Total 1250 2927 1250 2927 0 0 0 0 1250 2927 Combined 4177 4177 0 0 4177 Total AM Peak 11:30 AM Vol. 344 P. H. F. 0.905 PM Peak 5:00 PM Vol. 454 P.H.F. 0.887 Percentage 29.9% 70.1% #DIWOI #DIV/01 Speed Report - Prepared by: NDS /ATD University Avenue north of Towne Terrace Los Gatos Project #: 10- 7036 -001s Date: 2/12/2010 FRIDAY South Bound Begin 5- 15- 20 25- 30- 35- 40- 45- 50- 55- 60- 65- 70- Time 14 19 24 29 34 39 44 49 54 59 64 69 9999 Total 12:00 AM 0 1 1 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 12:15 AM 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 12:30 AM 2 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 12: 4 5 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hour Total 2 2 1 7 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 1:00 AM 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1:15 AM 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 :45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hour Total 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2:00 AM 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 :15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2:30 AM 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2: 45 AM 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Hour Total 0 1 2 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 3:00 AM 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 3:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 x:30 AM 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 45 AM 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 rfour Total 0 0 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 4:00 AM 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 4 :15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4:45 AM 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 Hour Total 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 5:00 AM 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 5:15 AM 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 5:30 AM 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 5:45 AM 1 2 4 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 Hour Total 1 2 6 7 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 6:00 AM 0 0 2 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 6:15 AM 0 1 0 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 6:30 AM 1 0 4 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 6 :45 AM 0 1 5 5 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 Hour Total 1 2 11 18 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 36 7:00 AM 0 3 7 8 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 7•:15 AM 1 4 15 20 7 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 48 7:30 AM 0 3 15 36 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 63 7:45 AM 2 2 19 23 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 53 Hour Total 3 12 56 87 24 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 183 8 :00 AM 1 3 31 27 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 67 8:15 AM 0 1 22 33 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 72 8:30 AM 1 9 25 19 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 63 8:45 AM 2 3 12 22 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 43 Hour Total 4 16 90 101 34 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0- 245 9:00 AM 0 4 17 25 3 2 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 51 9:15 AM 0 7 17 22 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 52 9:30 AM 0 7 19 30 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 58 9:45 AM 0 6 18 28 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 55 Hour Total 0 24 71 105 14 2.,_ _ .,,,0 ... _ .,0, 0 0..,, 0 _. 0 0 216 10:00 AM 1 1 14 29 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 53 10:15 AM 0 6 16 29 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 59 10:30 AM 0 7 30 24 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 64 10:45 AM 1 8 17 33 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 65 Hour Total _?. . ..:.7 7 ,..., .1 .. . 2 5_.:,. 0.. -.<. ..,,..0 0 ., . -0. 0. 0 .::....0 0.,...: 241 11:00 AM 0 6 13 42 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 70 11:15 AM 1 10 12 30 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 60 11:30 AM 2 6 21 36 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 77 11:45 AM 2 10 19 39 7 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 78 Hour Total 5 32 65 147_ 35 1 0 0 0,..,..- _0.,...__ 0 0 0 285 12:00 PM 5 14 28 42 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 99 12:15 PM 1 4 27 36 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 75 12:30 PM' 1 5 25 29 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 68 12 :45 PM 1 6 27 31 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 73 L Hour Total 8 29 107 138 .,._ 33 0_,,, 0 0 0 0_., 0 0 0 315 1:00 PM 2 2 43 29 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 83 1:15 PM 2 5 31 38 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 85 1:30 PM 2 5 34 29 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 74 1:45 PM 4 7 20 43 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 83 Hour Total 10 1 9...., 128 ...... 1 39:.. 2.8 1.. _... _0 , . . 0,..... 0. 0.,,. _ _ . 0,_... 0 . 0 325. 2:00 PM 1 3 25 34 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 70 2:15 PM 2 3 26 34 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 69 2:30 PM 0 15 41 38 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 97 2:45 PM 1 1 42 37 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 86 Hour Total 4 22,, . 134 143 _,O ._. .,,0:.: ..4, r ,...,.__0 0 0 :.,. 0 0..,.,.._. 322 3:00 PM 0 12 52 43 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 114 3:15 PM 1 6 26 36 7 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 77 3:30 PM 3 6 36 39 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 B9 3 :45 PM 0 16 35 38 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 95 Hour Total 4 40 149 1 5 6 .,..... _ 25 1 . Q . Q.. ...:. ,__ 0 .; , .....:.0 v, ..:.:. . 0 0 0 375.. . •00 PM 2 14 31 48 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 101 4:15 PM 2 6 37. 41 11 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 98 4:30 PM 3 4 49 50 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 114 4:45 PM 2 10 38 48 13 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 113 Hour Total 9 34 155 187 38 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 426 5:00 PM 9 13 77 43 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 151 5:15 PM 1 13 57 39 13 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 124 5:30 PM 1 9 44 60 .6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 120 5:45 PM 3 9 27 42 5 0 0 0 0- 0 0 0 0 86 Hour Total 14 44 205 184 33 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 481 6:00 PM 3 14 45 31 5 3 0 0 0 0 0 0. 0 101 6:15 PM 2 9 31 35 5 0. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 82 6:30 PM 2 10 29 38 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 83 6 :45 PM 2 15 29 28 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 77 Hour Total 9 48 134 132 17 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 343 7:00 PM 1 9 28 27 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 69 7:15 PM 1 9 25 20 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 57 7 :30 PM 0 6 15 15 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 37 7:45 PM 0 3 23 11 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 39 Hour Total 2 27 91 73 8 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 202 8:00 PM 1 5 5 11 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 8:15 PM 1 4 10 11 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 8:30 PM 0 3 6 8 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18 Q:45 PM 0 2 14 14 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 32 ur Total 2 14 35 44 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 101 9:00 PM 2 2 9 12 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 28 9:15 PM 3 2 21 6 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 34 9:30 PM 0 4 9 8 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 9:45 PM 1 4 10 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 Hour Total 6 12 49 33 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 106 10:00 PM 1 1 16 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 10:15 PM 0 1 5 7 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 10:30 PM 1 2 4 7 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 10:45 PM 0 0 3 10 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 Hour Total 2 4 28 28 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 69 11:00 PM 0 2 7 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 11:15 PM 0 0 6 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 11:30 PM 0 1 5 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 11:45 PM 0 1 0 1 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 Hour Total 0 4 18 11 3 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 38 Totals B8 410 1616 1860 364 14 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 4355 Speed Report Prepared by: NDS/ATD University Avenue north of Towne Terrace Los Gatos Project #: 10-7036-001s Date:._. 2/12/2010 South Bound Speed Statistics 15th Percentil . e Speed 20 MPH Median Speed (50th percentile) 25 MPH Average Speed = All Vehicles 25 MPH 85th Percentile Speed 29. MPH 95th Percentile Speed 32 MPH 10 MPH Pace Speed 20 - 29 MPH Number of Vehicles! - in Pace 3476 - Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 79.82% Number of Vehicles >= 25' 2241 Percentage of Vehicles >= 2 MPH 51.46% Prepared by NDS /ATD I 2/12/2010 City: Los Gatos Project #: 10-7036-001s Location: University Avenue north of Towne Terrace Start Southbound Hour Totals Northbound Hour Totals Combined Totals Time Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon 12:00 6 99 D 0 12:15 3 75 0 0 12:30 5 68 0 0 12:45 0 73 14 315 0 0 0 0 14 315 1:00 1 83 0 0 1:15 1 85 0 0 1:30 0 74 0 0 1:45 0 83 2 325 0 0 0 0 2 325 2:00 2 70 0 0 2:15 0 69 0 0 2:30 2 97 0 0 2:45 1 86 5 322 0 0 0 0 5 322 3:00 2 114 0 . 0 3:15 0 77 0 0 3:30 1 89 0 0 3:45 1 95 4 375 0 0 0 0 4 375 4:00 1 101 0 0 4:15 0 98 0 0 4:30 0 114 0 0 4:45 3 113 4 426 0 A 0 0 4 426 5:00 2 151 0 0 5:15 3 124 0 0 5:30 2 120 0 0 5:45 10 86 17 481 0 0 0 0 17 481 6:00 8 101 0 0 6:15 5 82 0 0 6:30 10 83 0 0 6:45 13 77 36 343 0 0 0 0 36 343 7:00 19 69 0 0 7:15 48 57 0 0 7:30 63 37 0 0 7:45 53 39 183 202 0 0 0 0 183 202 8:00 67 24 0 0 8:15 72 27 0 0 8:30 63 18 0 0 8:45 43 32 245 101 0 0 0 0 245 101 9:00 51 28 0 0 9:15 52 34 0 0 9:30 58 22 0 0 9:45 85 22 216 106 0 0 0 0 216 106 10:00 53 22 0 0 10:15 59 15 0 0 10:30 64 15 0 0 10:45 65. 17 241 69 0 0 0 0 241 69 11:00 70 16 0 0 11:15 60 9 0 0 11:30 77 8 0 0 11:45 78 5 285 .38 0 0 0 0 285 38 Total 1252 3103 1252 3103 0 0 0 0 1252 3103 Combined 4355 4355 0 0 4355 Total AM Peak 11:30 AM Vol. 329 P.H.F. 0.831 PM Peak 4:45 PM Vol. 508 P.H.F. 0.841 Percentage 28.7% 71.3% #DIV /01 #DIV /01 Prepared by NDS /ATD Volumes for: Saturday, February 6, 2010 City, Los Gatos Project #: 10- 7036 -001 Location: University Avenue north of Towne Terrace Start Northbound Hour Totals Southbound Hour Totals Combined Totals Time Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morn in Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon 12:00 0 84 0 63 12:15 0 82 0 62 12:30 0 98 0 61 12:45 0 99 0 363 0 70 0 256 0 619 1:00 0 104 0 54 1:15 0 79 0 74 1:30 0 82 0 55 1:45 0 84 0 349 0 59 0 242 0 591 2:00 0 77 0 54 2:15 0 101 0 47 2:30 0 75 0 50 2:45 0 98 0 351 0 54 0 205 0 556 3:00 0 86 0 53 3:15 0 75 0 65 3:30 0 95 0 68 3:45 0 97 0 353 0 66 0 252 0 605 4:00 0 96 0 64 4:15 0 108 0 69 4:30 0 85 0 58 4:45 0 72 0 361 0 49 0 240 0 601 5:00 0 66 0 64 5:15 0 61 0 39 5:30 0 82 0 63 5:45 0 81 0 290 0 39 0 205 0 495 6:00 0 52 0 35 6:15 0 74 0 38 6:30 0 44 0 33 6:45 0 50 0 220 0 37 0 143 0 363 7:00 0 58 0 36 7:15 0 38 .0 39 7:30 0 42 0 28 7:45 0 32 0 170 0 22 0 125 0 295 8:00 0 26 0 25 8:15 0 23 0 29 8:30 0 38 0 30 8:45 0 15 0 102 0 17 0 101 0 203 9:00 0 20 0 23 9:15 0 28 0 19 9:30 28 28 28 27 0 9:45 52 27 80 103 42 22 70 91 150 194 10:00 41 30 40 25 10:15 58 35 56 13 10:30 59 23 50 14 10:45` 68 22 226 110 68 10 214 62 440 172 11:00 78 11 52 17 11:15 58 12 60 16 11:30 91 11 52 11 11:45' 105 11 332 45 65 3 229 - 47 561 92 638 2817 513 1969 513 1969 Total 638 2817 1151 4786 Combined 3455 3455 2482 2482 5937 . Total AM Peak 11:45 AM 11 :45 AM Vol. 369 251 P.H.F. 0,879 0.965 PM'Peak 3:30 PM 3:30 PM Vol. 396 267 P.H.F. 0.990 0.967 Percentage 18.5% 81.5% 20.7% 79.3% Prepared by NDS /ATD Volumes for: Sunday, February 7, 2010 City: Los Gatos Project #: 10 -7036 -001 Location: University Avenue north of Towne Terrace Start Northbound Hour Totals Southbound Hour Totals Combined Totals Time Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon 12:00 13 51 10 41 12:15 10 95 9 B2 12:30 3 . 81 4 77 12:45 6 86 32 313 3 51 26 231 58 544 1:00 5 66 3 64 1:15 6 76 2 52 1:30 3 84 2 59 1:45 0 70 14 296 4 55 11 230 25 526 2:00 3 78 6 55 2:15 1 83 6 48 2:30 6 71 3 57 2 :45 1 59 11 291 1 41 16 201 27 492 3:00 2 101 1 48 3:15 2 58 1 47 3:30 2 46 0 31 3:45 0 30 6 235 0 36 2 162 8 397 4:00 2 56 1 23 4:15 0 39 1 30 4:30 1 37 0 19 4:45 3 35 6 167 0 27 2 99 8 266 5:00 1 34 1 23 5:15 1 25 1 26 5:30 0 31 3 28 5:45 5 19 7 109 3 13 8 90 15 199 6:00 6 12 3 19 6:15 4 18 2 25 6:30 2 21 4 20 6:45 5 28 17 79 2 39 11 103 28 182 7:00 6 44 4 36 7:15 13 59 7 30 7:30 8 34 5 24 7:45 15 25 42 162 9 21 25 111 67 273 8:00 17 27 9 14 8:15 30 27 14 14 8:30 27 30 31 16 8:45 36 23 110 107 21 15 75 59 185 166 9:00 36 28 26 13 9:15 37 13 35 11 9:30 39 16 25 24 0 9:45 49 9 161 66 51 7 137 55 298 121 10:00 37 13 38 9 10:15 42 10 46 5 10:30 70 7 55 8 10:45 81 12 230 42 50 6 189 28 419 70 11:00 54 6 48 4 11:15 61 6 42 4 11:30 64 3 49 2 11:45 73 6 252 21 50 2 189 12 1 441 33 Total 888 1888 888 1888 691 1381 691 1381 1579 3269 Combined Total 2776 2776 2072 2072 4848 AM Peak 11:45 AM 11:45 AM Vol. 300 230 P. H. F. 0.789 0.747 PM Peak 12:15 PM 12:15 PM Vol. 328 254 P.H.F. 0.916 0.825 Percentage 32.0% 68,0% 33.3% 66.7% Prepa red 'by NDSIATD Volumes for Monday, February 8, 2010 Location: University Avenue north of Towne Terrace 3610 City: Los Gatos - Total Project #: 10- 7036 -001 AM Peak Start Northbound Hour Totals 339 Southbound Hour Totals Combined Totals Time Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon ` Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon 12:00 2 85 38.3 % 61.7% 0 75 12:15 2 62 3 54 12:30 2 71 1 58 12:45 3 68 9 286 1 58 5 245 14 531 1:00 2 69 3 63 1:15 1 72 0 56 1:30 2 83 3 67 1:45 0 61 5 285 0 51 6 237 11 522 2:00 1 66 0 91 2:15 2 65 0 86 2:30 2 94 1 73 2:45 0 100 5 325 2 59 3 309 8 634 3:00 0 83 0 77 3:15 0 93 1 60 3:30 0 91 0 68 3:45 1 93 1 360 0 " 76 1 281 2 641 4:00 1 107 0 48 4:15 0 99 0 49 4:30 1 94 1 78 4:45 4 108 6 408 4 58 5 233 11 641 5:00 5 105 3 75 5:15 1 101 3 63 5:30 5 92 4 60 5:45 7 106 18. 404 6 70 16 268 34 672 6:00 5 81 5 56 6:15 14 78 9 35 6:30 17 0 21 0 6:45 21 0 57 33 0 68 125 7:00 .24 0 32 0 7:15 59 0 39 0 7:30 80 0 58 0 7:45 64 0 227 114 0 243 . 470 8:00 67 0 101 0 8:15 78 0 49 0 8:30 59 '0 65 0 8:45> 77 0 281 90 0 305 586 9:00 60 0 73 0 9:15 66 0 43 0 9:30 46 0 43 0 0 9:45 - 61 0 233 44 0 203 436 10:00 59 0 38 0 10:15 62 0 55 0 10:30 57 0 =45 0 10:45' 44 0 222 = 1 `47 0 185 407 11:00 65 0 45 0 11:15 78 0 44 0 11:30 81 0 71 0 11:45 95 0 319 57 0 21.7, 536. 2227 Combined 3610 Total AM Peak 11:15 AM Vol. 339 P.H.F. 0.892 PM Peak 4:00 PM Vol. 408 P.H.F. 0:921 Percentage 38.3 % 61.7% 13 2068 1257 1664 1257 1573 2640 3641 3451 2921 2830 6281 7:45 AM 329 OJ21 2:00 PM 309 0.849 43.0% 57.0% f � Speed Report - Prepared by: NDS /ATD University Avenue north of Towne Terrace Los Gatos Project #: 10- 7036 -001n Date: 2/15/2010 MONDAY North Bound Begin 5- 15- 20- 25 -. 30- 35- 40- 45- 50- 55- 60- 65- 70- Time 14 19 24 29 34 39 44 49 54 59 64 69 9999 Total 12:00 AM - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12:1.5 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hour Total 0 0 0' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hour Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2:15 AM D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hour Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 `30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hour Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4::00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hour Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hour Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hour Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 :30 AM 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hour Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 � 8: 00 AM n o n o o n n O o o n 0 o n 8: 15 am 0 o O n n o o O O u o o o o 8:30 um n n o o o o o o o o o O o o o:^s am o u n o o u o n n o n n o n zu'*s PM o o n n u o n o u u u o o o 9: 00 AM o 0 O n 0 0 0 ` V � O _ O O -0 n 9: 15 AM u n n U n n o o 0 n o 0 n o o:sO Am O O o o O 0 V o O 0 o o 0 0 o:^a am o o o o o o o n o o u o n o zu'*s PM o o n n u o n o u u u o o o 10:00 AM n 0 n O o n O O 8 n 0 o n o zo:ls my n n n O o 0 o n O o 0 O o 0 10: 30 Am U V 0 0 8 Q O o O O O Q 0 o 10:45 aa o o o n u u o n n u n o o o c:«5 pm n n o 0 o o 0 0 o n 8 n o n 11:00 AM n o O O n o o O n o O o O o 11:15 pm o o O o o o n o n o O o O 0 11:30 AM 0 O O u U O O 0 0 o o 8 0 O D:*n ao n o O o o o o O o O O o o o Hour Total 0 - 0 0 �. - _ o - - 0 . --_» o - P�_ -V -p O 12:00 em o n o n n o o o n n o n o n le:za PM 8 n o n 0 O o O 0 o u 0 o o 12:30 ra o 0 O O o n o O o o o n o n zu'*s PM o o n n u o n o u u u o o o Hour Total 0 - 0 0 �. - _ o - - 0 . --_» o - P�_ -V -p O 1: 00 om O n n n o o o u 0 o O n 0 O 1: 15 PM o o o n o o o O o n o 0 O 0 1: 30 eo 0 O 8 n 0 n o o O 0 n O o n z 45 PM o o u o o n o o o u o n n o 2: 00 PM n 0 o o o o n o o O n n O n 2: 15 Pm 0 n o u q 0 n O n n 0 o n o c:sn eo n o 0 n n o o o 0 D o n n o c:«5 pm n n o 0 o o 0 0 o n 8 n o n 3: 00 PM u o o u n 0 o o o 0 o O O o 3: 15 PM 0 n 0 n o o 8 0 n n n n 0 n 3: 30 rm O n n o 0 0 0 o 0 n O n n o 3'4o Pm o n o o 8 0 n O o o o n O o Hour Total 0 - ___0 ~ _0 _ 0 0 .-o _ o_ 0 _- P' _ , 0 -- .Q- q :00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4: 4 5 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hour Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 5:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hour Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hour Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7:00 PM 2 11 4 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 7:15 PM 0 11 11 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 7:30 PM 0 5 9 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 7:45 PM 0 9 8 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 Hour Total 2 36 32 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 80 8:00 PM 1 5 8 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 8 ;15 PM 0 4 8 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 8:30 PM 0 10 7 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 R:45 PM 0 6 10 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18 >ur Total 1 25 33 11 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 70 9:00 PM 0 3 8 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 9 :15 PM 1 4 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 9:30 PM 0 1 3 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 9:45 PM 0 4 9 2 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18 Hour Total 1 12 23 9 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 48 10:00 PM 0 4 8 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 10 :15 PM 1 3 7 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 10:30 PM 0 6 10 7 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 10:45 PM 0 5 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 Hour Total 1 18 29 12 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 62 11:00 PM 0 3 5 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 11:15 PM 0 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 11:30 PM 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 11:45 PM 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 Hour Total 0 6 10 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 Totals 5 97 127 46 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 280 Speed Report - Prepared by: NDS/ATD University Avenue north of Towne Terrace Los Gatos Project #: 10-7036-001n Date: 2/15/2010, — North Bound Speed Statistics 15th Percentile Speed 17 MPH Median Speed (50th percentile) 21 MPH Average Speed - AllVehicles 22 MPH . 85th Percentile Speed 26 MPH 95th Percentile Speed 29 MPH 10 MPH Pace Speed 15 - 24 MPH - Number of - Vehicles in Pace - 224 Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 80.00% Number of Vehicles >= 25 MPH 51 Percentage of Vehicles >= 25 MPH 18.21% f Prepared by NDS /ATD 2/15/2010 City: Los Gatos Project #: 10-7036-001s Location: University Avenue north of Towne Terrace Start Southbound Hour Totals Northbound Hour Totals Combined Totals Time Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon 12:00 0 0 0 0 12:15 0 0 0 0 12:30 0 0 0 0 12:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1:00 0 0 0 0 1:15 0 0 0 0 1:30 0 0 0 0 1:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2:00 0 0 0 0 2:15 0 0 0 0 2:30 0 0 0 0 2:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3:00 0 0 0 0 3:15 0 0 0 0 3:30 0 0 0 0 3:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4:00 0 D 0 0 4:15 0 0 0 0 4:30 0 0 0 0 4:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5:00 0 0 0 0 5:15 0 0 0 0 5:30 0 0 0 0 5:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6:00 0 0 0 0 6:15 0 0 0 0 6:30 0 0 0 0 6:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7:00 0 0 0 19 7:15 0 0 0 25 7:30 0 0 0 17 7:45 0 0 0 0 0 19 0 80 0 80 8:00 0 0 0 16 8:15 0 0 0 17 8:30 0 0 0 19 8:45 0 0 0 0 0 18 0 70 0 70 9:00 0 0 0 12 9:15 0 0 0 9 9:30 0 0 0 9 9:45 0 0 0 0 0 18 0 48 0 48 10:00 0 0 0 14 10:15 0 0 0 13 10:30 0 0 0 25 10:45 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 62 0 62 11:00 0 0 0 10 11:15 0 0 0 4 11:30 0 0 0 3 11:45 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 20 0 20' Total 0 0 0 0 0 280 0 280 0 280 Combined Total 0 0 280 280 280 AM Peak Vol. P.H.F. PM Peak 7:00 PM Vol. 80 P.H.F. 0.800 Percentage #DIV /01 #DIV/01 0.0% 100.0% Speed Report - Prepared by: NDS /ATD University Avenue north of Towne Terrace Los Gatos Project 4: 10- 7036 -001n Date: 2/16/2010 TUESDAY North Bound Begin 5- 15- 20- 25- 30- 35- 40- 45- 50- 55- 60- 65- 70- Time 14 19 24 29 34 39 44 49 54 59 64 69 9999 Total 12:00 AM 0 2 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 12:15 AM 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 12:30 AM 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 12 : 45 'AM 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - 0 1 Hour Total 0 4 4 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 1:00 AM 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1:45 AM 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Hour Total 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2:00 AM 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 :15 AM 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2:45 AM 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 Hour Total 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 3:00 AM 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 3:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 :45 AM 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Hour Total 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 4:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4:15 AM 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Q 0 0 0 1 4:30 AM 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 4:45 AM 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 Hour Total 0' 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 = 0 6 5:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5:15 AM 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 5:30 AM 0 1 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 5:45 AM 0 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 Hour Total 0. 2 8 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 6:00 AM 0 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 6:15 AM 0 1 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 6:30 AM 0 1 6 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 6:45 AM 0 12 17 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 36 Hour Total 0 16 29 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 57 7:00 AM 2 5 13 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 7:15 AM 2 8 10 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 28 7:30 AM 0 11 19 4 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 34 7:45 AM 8 21 19 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 51 Hour Total 12 45 61 19 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 138 00 AM 5 13 25 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 48 8 :15 AM 1 11 25 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 40 8:30 AM 1 11 21 6 0 0 0 0 0' 0 0 0 0 39 8:45 AM 4 21 31 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 63 Hour Total 11 56 102 21 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 190 9 :00 AM 2 7 29 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 43 9:15 AM 6 11 26 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50 9 :30 AM 9 16 27 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 55 9:45 AM 1 10 25 10 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 47 Hour Total 18 44 107 25 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 195 10:00 AM 6 14 25 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 48 10:15 AM 2 12 29 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 53 10:30 AM 5 12 30 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 48 10:45 AM 3 14 26 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 52 Hour Total 16 52 110 23 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 201 11:00 AM 4 17 27 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 54 11:15 AM 4 14 24 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 47 11:30 AM 3 18 21 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 48 11:45 AM 10 18 18 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 52 Hour Total 21 67 90 22 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 201 12:00 PM 3 14 17 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 41 12:15 PM 8 20 23 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 53 12:30 PM 1 19 30 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 58 1.2:45 PM 6 17 32 5 0 0 0 •0 0 0 0 0 0 60 -ur Total 18 70 102 22 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 212 1:00 PM 8 19 36 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 73 1:15 PM 3 17 26 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 53 1:30 PM 3 20 29 12 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 65 1:45 PM 4 20 34. 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 60 Hour Total 18 76 125 31 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 251 2:00 PM 6 25 31 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 67 2:15 PM 4 24 30 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 65 2:30 PM 6 13 27 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 55 2:45 PM 4 16 24 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0' 51 Hour Total 20 78 112 28 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 238 3:00 PM 3 17 30 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 55 3:15 PM 6 24 24 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 60 3:30 PM 9 31 31 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 80 3:45 PM 7 19 33 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 67 Hour Total 25 91 118 28 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 262 «:nn ea 9 19 nz « O o 0 u n o o O n 54 ` 4: 15 pm 2 za 28 6 n n 0 o n 0 0 n o 59 «:so PM c co 24 4 O n o n n n V U O 52 « 5: 00 sm. 10 14 16 7 o 0 0 n 0 0 o o 0 47 5: 15 po O xs cl 6 o o 0 n 0 n 0 0 o 53 s: 30 Pm 7 14 cl 4 o 0 o 0 U u 0 o O 46 6:00 rm z 13 25 5 U 0 0 n O O u o 0 44 6:15 em l 10 zl 8 o O o O O u o o 40 6'30 PM n lO 27 s o O O O. O n . O n o o o% 2 ` 7:00 na l 7 23 o O 0 O o 0 n o O V as 7:15 em o 16 xy s U 0 0 0 0 0 O n o 42 7:30 PM u lO ls o o o o n 8 O O n O sa o:00 PM n 5 10 1 O O o o o o o U O 16 8:15 my n e 15 u z o o o n o 0 o n cs 8: 30 PM n 7 lO 9 o n o o o n o O O 26 Hour Total 1 25 *o 14 1 v v " " " " " , = � e:nn ru O o y o o o o n o o n n o 19 9:15 Pm n s zs 3 n o O o o o o O n oz 9: 30 ro 0 s o z z o n n o o O n o oo ' 4 ^ 10m0 ro z n zo 0 0 0 o o 0 o n o o ls lO:zo PM n a 5 z O n n 0 n o o O 0 p 10:30 PM n z a l 8 n 0 o o o o n n s 11:00 PM n c 3 s o o o n 0 o 0 n n u 11:15 PM n o » 1 o n n 0 o 0 o n n « 11:30 ma o n z o o O n 0 o o O o O 1 Totals 209 890 1441 351 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2898 Speed Report - Prepared by: NDS /ATD University Avenue north of Towne Terrace Los Gatos Project #: 10- 7036 -001n Date: 2/16/2010' North. Hound Speed Statistics. 15th Percentile Speed 16 MPH Median Speed (50th percentile) 21 MPH Average Speed - All Vehicles 21 MPH 85th Percentile Speed 25 MPH 95th Percentile Speed 28 MPH 10 MPH Pace Speed 15 - 24 MPH Number of Vehicles in Pace 2331 Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 80.43% Number of Vehicles >= MPH 358 Percentage of Vehicles >= 25 MPH 12.35% Prepared by NDS/ATD 2/1612010 City: Los Gatos Project #: 10-7036-001s Location: University Avenue north of Towne Terrace Start Southbound Hour Totals Northbound Hour Totals Combined Totals Time Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon 12:00 0 0 6 41 12:15 0 0 3 53 12:30 0 0 1. 58 12:45 0 0 0 0 1 60 11 212 11 212 1:00 0 0 1 73 1:15 0 0 0 53 1:30 0 0 0 65 1:45 0 0 0 0 1 60 2 251 2 251 2:00 0 0 1 67 2:15 0 0 1- 65 2:30 0 0 0 55 2:45 0 .0 0 0 2 51 4 238 4 238 3:00 0 0 t 55 0 0 0 3:30 0 0 0 80 3:45. 0 0 0 0 1 67.,, 2 262 2 262 4:00 0 0 0 54 4:15 0 0 1 59 4:30 0 0 2 52 4:45 0 0 0 0 `43 6 208 6 208 5:00 0 0 0 47 . ..... 61 .15 0 0 4 53 5:30 0 0 5 46 5:45 0 0 0 0 4 49 13 195 13 195 6:00 0 0 5 44 6:15 0 0 5 40 6:30 0 0 11 42 6:45 0 0 0 0 W 27 57 153 57 153 7:00 0 0 25 35 7:15 0 0 28 42 7:30 0 0 34 33 7:45 0 0 0 0 61 23 138 133 138 133 8:00 0 0 48 16 8:15 0 0 40 26 8:30 0 0 39 26 8:45 0 0 0 0 63 21 190 89 190 89 9:00 0 0 43 19 9:15 0 0 50 21 9:30 0 .0 55 20 9:45 0 0 0 0 47 20 195 80 195 80 10:00 0 0 48 16 10:15 0 0 53 9 10:30 0. 0 48 5 10:45 0 0 0 0 52 12 201 42 201 42 11:00 0 0 54 8 11:15 0 0 47 4 11:30 0 0 48 1 11:45 0 0 0 0 52 2 201 15 201 15 Total 0 0 0 0 1020 1878 1020 1878 1020 1878 Combined 0 0 2898 2898 2898 Total AM Peak 8:45 AM Vol. 211 P.H.F. 0.837 PM Peak 3:00 PM Vol. 262 P.H.F. 0.819 Percentage #DIV/O! #DIVIOI 35.2% 64.8% r Speed Report - Prepared by: NDS, /ATD University Avenue north of Towne Terrace Los Gatos r� Project #: 10- 7036 -001n Date: 2/17/2010 WEDNESDAY North Bound Begin 5- 15- 20- 25- 30- 35- 40- 45- 50- 55- 6D- 65- 70- Time 14 19 24 29 34 39 44 49 54 59 64 69 9999 Total 12:00 AM 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 12:15 AM 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 12:30 AM 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 12:45 AM 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 Hour Total 0 3 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 1:00 AM 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1:30 AM 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 1:45 AM 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 Hour Total 0 1 .5 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 2:00 AM 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 :15 AM 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2:30 AM 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 2:45 AM 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Hour Total 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 3:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3:15 AM 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 30 AM. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hour Total 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 4:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4:45 AM 0 1 0 0 0 0. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Hour Total 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 5:00 AM 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 5:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5:30 AM 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 5:45 AM 0 1 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 Hour Total 0 2 12 1 0 D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 6:00 AM 0 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 6:15 AM 1 3 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 6:30 AM 0 3 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 6:45 AM 0 5 15 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 Hour Total 1 13 29 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 49 7:00 AM 2 8 13 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 31 7:15 AM 0 4 13 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 26 7:30 AM 1 9 17 8 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 36 7:45 AM 4 19 27 8 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 59 Hour Total 7 40 70 33 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 152 8: 00 mm 5 s cz 8 z o O n n O o 0 o m 8: 15 Am 5 z* zO 6 o O o 0 n n O O n 45 8: 30 mm 0 zs sz s z o O n o n 0 o o 52 8:45 um c zz xu n o u o o n o n o o 41 Hour ^""a^ ~~ _,~ _ 93 ' _ - -� - -' 0 0. _ 9: 00 AM _A_^, ou 8 1 \^~_ 0 o- 0 --P _ -P- P u . 5 a 9: 15 am 3 zx 21 10 0 O o o ` 0 O 8 0 n 52 9: 30 am n 8 20 o o o 0 n O n O o o ss s AM e zz zo y z o o n n o o o n oz ~~.- To _- ', 99 - 35 .~--_--__ - -_-_- __ 10:00 AM 3 16 23 9 l O o 0 U 0 o O O ox 10: 15 ao u 8 23 6 o o O 0 0 n n o o n* 10: 30 my u 9 22 9 O n O O o 0 n 0 o Ac zo:*o ma s o zo s o u n u u n o n n 57 """^ 5 6 ^ 19 ll:oo AM 2 1* un 4 O O o . n o O O 0 o 53 11:15 am e lz 24 8 n o o 0 O n o O o 46 zz:sO my 3 9 as p l O O 0 n 0 0 o 0 57 11:45 AM 1 16 ss s n n o o o o n n o sa ~~.^ To tal - � - -^ '~~=' -_-`_~-- -~' -, -~-_ -~ - --_- 12:00 Pm 6 lo uz A n o o o o n 0 o o sz zzIs PM « ls 28 o o n O O O o o O o 55 zc:an ma s oa oz 7 o n 0 0 o o O o o 70 zo��s e� 4 cx on lO u o o n n o n o o sz ' / Hour Total 19 82 ` 105 ' 2.9 �.'��_- .»- .-V- _-�-- _P .- q V.-zxZ \ l:oo em 14 zo 32 12 n o 0 o n o n o o 74 l:zs ma z zo xs D o o n 0 o o n o n m 1:30 ae o zs 35 a 2 n n o O O o o n 73 z:«s sy zn 1e 27 y z o o u n o n o n os ---- To tal ° ,- _--^ ' 1 19 40 3 0 -___ - -- � z:no em o c« 29 o o o n n n n n o o 60 z'zs PM o zS 37 z n 0 u O o n o n o 70 2:30 ea 3 17 sz 7 l o o n O O o o o sn c 2 16 za e o o n o o o o n n on Hour Tot 1 15 82 124 18 - -'0 -__-.0.-.~-0 - �� - �� 2 3:00 em s e 26 o o o n o n O o n n uo s:zs Pm e 14 cl 7 l O 0 o n o 0 o 0 «n 3: 30 om 7 * sl u 0 n O 0 u o o O o 55 o: 4s sm s zo 28 r z n n n o u o o o s* _-._ To tal ``' 1 06 .. � -~. — ~ ~. ---_- -_ 0 0 1 --- Oz ' 0 __ __ 00 PM 7 18 21 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 54 4:15 PM 9 20 24 5 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 60 4:30 PM 4 14 24 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50 4:45 PM 1 14 25 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 45 Hour Total 21 66 94 26 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 209 5:00 PM 8 19 20 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 52 5:15 PM 10 14 25 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 56 5:30 PM 4 15 21 5 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 0 0 45 5:45 PM 3 20 20 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 47 Hour Total 25 68 86 18 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 200 6:00 PM 1. 28 29 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 63 6:15 PM 2 14 21 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 41 6:30 PM 5 11 22 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 40 6:45 PM 1 21 13 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 37 Hour Total 9 74 85 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 181 7:00 PM 2 10 23 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 40 7:15 PM 6 11 16 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 38 7:30 PM 1 8 16 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 7:45 PM 0 7 14 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 28 Hour Total 9 36 69 17 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 133 8:00 PM 1 7 10 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 8:15 PM 0 8 16 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 29 8:30 PM 1 11 9 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 Q:45 PM 0 3 8 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 ur Total 2 29 43 19 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 93 9:00 PM 0 4 12 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 9.:15 PM 1 4 10 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 9:30 PM 3 4 8 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 9:45 PM 0 8 12 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 Hour Total 4 20 42 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 73 10:00 PM 0 5 7 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 10:15 PM 0 2 10 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 10:30 PM 0 2 8 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 10:45 PM 0 1 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 Hour Total 0 10 28 10 0 0 0 0� 0 0 0 0 0 48 11:00 PM 1 1 7 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 11:15 PM 0 2 0 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 11:30 PM 0 0 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 11:45 PM 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Hour Total 1 3 11 8 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 Totals 199 850 1434 402 25 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2911 Speed Report - Prepared by: NDS/ATD University Avenue north of Towne Terrace Los Gatos Project #: 10-703'6-001n Date 2/17/2010 North Bound Speed Statistics, 15th Percentile Speed 16 MPH Median Speed (50th percentile) 21, MPH Average Speed - All'4Vehicles 21, MPH 85th Percentile Speed 25 MPH 95th ..Percentile Speed 29 MPH 10 MPH Pace Speed 15 24 MPH Number icles -in 6f VeE' 2284 - Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 78.46% Number of Vehicles >= 25 MPH 428 Percentage of Vehicles >= 25 MPH 14.70% Prepared by NDS /ATD 2/17/2010 City: Los Gatos Project #: 10-7036-001s Location: University Avenue north of Towne Terrace Start Southbound Hour Totals Northbound Hour Totals Combined Totals Time Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon 12:00 0 0 1 51 12:15 0 0 3 55 12:30 0 0 1 70 12:45 0 0 0 0 2 61 7 237 7 237 1:00 0 0 2 74 1:15 0 0 0 47 1:30 0 0 3 73 1:45 0 0 0 0 8 66 8 260 8 260 2:00 0 0 1 60 2:15 0 0 1 70 2:30 0 0 2 60 2:45 0 0 0 0 1 50 5 240 5 240 3:00 0 0 0 45 3:15 0 0 2 45 3:30 0 0 0 55 3:45 0 0 0 0 0 54 2 199 2 199 4:00 0 0 0 54 4:15 0 0 0 60 4:30 0 0 0 50 4:45 0 0 0 0 1 45 1 209 1 209 5:00 0 0 2 52 5:15 0 0 0 56 5:30 0 0 3 45 5:45 0 0 0 0 10 47 15 200 15 200 6:00 0 0 4 63 6:15 0 0 8 41 6:30 0 0 13 40 6:45 0 0 0 0 24 37 49 181 49 181 7:00 0 0 31 40 7:15 0 0 26 38 7:30 0 0 36 27 7:45 0 0 0 0 59 28 152 133 152 133 8:00 0 0 41 22 8:15 0 0 45 29 8:30 0 0 52 25 8:45 0 0 0 0 41 17 179 93 179 93 9:00 0 0 56 17 9:15 0 0 52 19 9:30 0 0 36 16 9:45 0 0 0 0 51 21 195 73 195 73 10:00 0 0 52 15 10:15 0 0 39 14 10:30 0 0 42 13 10:45 0 0 0 0 57 6 190 48 190 48 11:00 0 0 53 11 11:15 0 0 46 7 11:30 0 0 57 5 11:45 0 0 0 0 55 1 211 24 211 24 Total 0 0 0 0 1014 1897 1014 1897 1014 1897. Combined 0 Total AM Peak Vol. P.H.F. PM Peak Vol. P.H.F. 0 2911 11:45 AM 231 0.825 1:30 PM 269 0.921 2911 2911 Percentage #DIV /01 #DIV /01 34.8% 65.2% Speed Report - Prepared by: NDS /ATD University Avenue north of Towne Terrace Los Gatos Project #: 10- 7036 -001n Date: 2/18/2010 THURSDAY N orth Bound 6 Begin Time 5- 14 15- 19 20- 24 25- 29 30- 34 35- 39 40- 44 45- 49 50- 54 55- 59 60- 64 65- 69 70- 9999 Total 6 12:00 AM 0 0 4 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 12:15 AM 0 0 0 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 12:30 AM 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 12: 45 AM 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Hour Total 1 0 5 5 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 1:00. AM 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1:30 AM 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1:45 AM 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0; 0 0 0 2 Hour Total 0 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 2 :00 AM 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2:30 AM 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 :45 AM 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 Hour Total 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 3:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3:15 AM 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 3 :30 AM 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 3:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hour Total 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 4:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4:15 AM 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 4:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4:45 AM 0 0 1 0 0 0 -0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Hour Total 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 5:00 AM 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 5:15 AM 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 5:30 AM 0 0 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 5: 4 5 AM 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 =0 3 Hour Total 0 2 10 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 6:00 AM 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 6:15 AM 0 1 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 6:30 AM 0 4 6 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 6:45 AM 0 9 21 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 33 Hour Total 0 15 32 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 52 7:00 AM 0 12 20 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 35 7: 15 AM 5 7 13 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 _ 0 28 7:30 AM 0 4 11 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 7:45 AM 2 8 21 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 39 Hour Total 7 31 65 17 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 121 00 AM 1 3 23 12 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 41 8:15 AM 1 8 29 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 48 8:30 AM 0 13 25 9 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 48 8:45 AM 0 13 38 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 59 Hour Total 2 37 115 39 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 196 9 :00 AM 5 13 21 12 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 52 9:15 AM 1 16 26 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 52 9:30 AM 1 15 20 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 43 9:45 AM 8 10 27 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 51 Hour Total 15 54 94 34 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 198 10 :00 AM 0 15 27 4 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 46 10:15 AM 3 10 25 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 45 10:30 AM 3 11 19 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 39 10:45 AM 8 15 33 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 63 Hour Total 14 51 104 24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 193 11:00 AM 4 9 31 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 51 11 :15 AM 5 23 30 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 65 11:30 AM 4 23 22 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 55 11:45 AM 3 26 36 7 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 73 Hour Total 16 81 119 25 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 244 12:00 PM 2 10 23 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 39 12:15 PM 7 15 27 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 55 12:30 PM 6 15 23 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 48 ? :45 PM 5 31 22 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 68 ur Total 20 71 95 23 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 210 1:00 PM 5 28 28 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 65 1:15 PM 5 18 20 10 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 54 1:30 PM 2 14 37 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 58 1:45 PM 4 16 35 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 65 Hour Total 16 76 120 29 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 242 2:00 PM 4 22 30 8 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 65 2:15 PM 2 27 22 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 62 2:30 PM 0 21 31 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 57 2:45 PM 6 30 28 6 D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 70 Hour Total 12 100 111 30 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 254 3:00 PM 2 11 27 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 52 3:15 PM 3 20 25 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 55 3:30 PM 14 18 23 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 64 3:45 PM 1 13 24 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 46 Hour Total 20 62 99 36 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 217 4:00 PM 2 17 23 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 48 4:15 PM 6 23 25 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 57 4:30 PM 5 18 28 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 57 4:45 PM 3 13 21 7 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 45 Hour Total 16 71 97 22 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 207 5:00 PM 6 27 23 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 65 5:15 PM 7 26 24 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 62 5:30 PM 3 18 22 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 45 5:45 PM. 2_ 15 22 13 0 0_ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 52 Hour Total 18 86 91 28 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 224 6:00 PM 4 12 23 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 43 6:15 PM 4 16 18 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 41 6 :30 PM 0 15 21 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 41 6:45 PM_' _ 2 16 17 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 39 Hour Total 10 59 79 15 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 164 7:00 PM 4 11 13 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 34 7:15 PM 3 5 16 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 7:30 PM 3 15 13 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 32 7:45 PM 1 9 12 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 28 Hour Total 11 40 54 19 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 124 8:00 PM 3 6 17 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 28 8:15 PM 0 7 14 4 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 8 :30 PM 0 8 15 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 8: 4 5 PM,.?,._, 0 5 14 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 Hour Total 3 26 60 11 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 102 9:00 PM 3 8 9 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 9:15 PM 1 16 16 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 34 9:30 PM 0 9 12 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 9:45 PM 0 3 10 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 Hour Total- 4 36 47 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 96 10:00 PM 0 2 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 10:15 PM. 0 2 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 10:30 PM 0 3 8 4 0 0 0 0 _0 0 0 0 0 15 10:45 PM- 1 1 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0' 0 0 10 Hour Total 1 8 33 5 • 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 47 11:00 PM 0 1 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 11 :15 PM 0 0 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 11:30 PM 1 4 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 11:45 PM 0 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 Hour Total 1 6 13 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 Totals 187 914 1454 383 17 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2956 Speed Report - .Prepared. by: NDS /ATD University Avenue north of Towne Terrace Los Gatos Project #: 10- 7036 -001n Date: 2/18/2010 North Bound SDeed Statistics. 15th Percentile Speed Median Speed (50th percentile) Average Speed - All Vehicles 85th Percentile Speed 95th Percentile Speed 10 MPH Pace Speed Number of Vehicles in Pace Percentage of Vehicles in Pace Number of Vehicles >= 25 MPH Percentage of Vehicles >= 25 MPH 16 MPH 21 MPH 21 MPH 25 MPH 28 MPH 15 - 24 MPH 2368 80.11% 401 13.57% Prepared by NDS/ATD 2/18/2010 1 . . : City: Los Gatos Project# 10-7036-001s Location: University Avenue north of Towne Terrace Start Southbound Hour Totals Northbound Hour Totals Combined Totals Time Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon 12:00 0 0 6 39 12:15 0 0 5 55 12:30 0 0 1. 48 12:45 0 0 0 0 1 68 13 210 13 210 1:00 0 0 1 65 1:15 0 0 0 64 1:30 0 0 1 58 1:45 0 0 0 0 2 65 4 :242 4 242 2:00 0 0 2 65 2:15 0 0 62 2:30 0 0 1 57 2:45 0 0 0 0 2 70 5 254 5' 254 3�0 0 0 .-52 3:15 0 0 1 5 0 0 6 3:45 0 0 0 0 01 ' 46.,� 2 21 2 217 '­3; 4 :00' :. .. 0 0 48 4' ; 15,:. 0 0 2 57 4:30. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 _.�7 fil', " 7 45 3' 2�67 3 207 5:00, 0 0 2 51 1 5 0 0 2 5:30 0 0 7w- 5:45 0 0 0 0 3 _52 14 224 14 224 6:00 0 0 2 43 6:15 0 0 5 -41 6:30 0 0 12 6:45 0 C) 0, 33 39 62' 164 52 164 7:00 0 0 35 34 7:15 0 0 28 30 7:30 0 0 19 32 7:45 0 0 0 0 39 28 121 124 121 124 8:00 0 0 41 28 8:15 0 0 48 27 8:30 0 0 48 24 8:45 0 0 0 0 59 23 196 102 196 102 9:00 0 0 52 22 9:15 0 0 52 34 9:30 0 0 43 23 9:45 0 0 0 0 51 17 198 96 198 96 10:00 0 0 46 13 10:15 0 0 45 9 10:30 0 0 39 15 10:45 0 0 0 0 63 10 193 47 193 47 11:00 0 0 51 6 11:15 0 0 65 6 11:30 0 0 55 8 11:45 0 0 0 0 73 4 244 24 244 24 Total 0 0 0 0 1045 1911 1045 1911 1045 1911 Combined 0 0 2956 2956 2956 Total AM Peak 11:00 AM Vol. 244 P.H.F. 0.836 PM Peak 2:00 PM Vol. 254 P.H.F. 0.907 Percentage #DIV/01 #DIV/O! 35.4% 64.6% r . Speed Report - Prepared by: NDS /ATD University Avenue north of Towne Terrace Los Gatos Project #: 10- 7036 -001n Date: 2/19/2010 FRIDAY North Bound Begin 5- 15- 20- 25- 30- 35- 40- 45- 50- 55- 60- 65- 70- Time 14 19 24 29 34 39 44 49 54 59 64 69 9999 Total 12:00 AM 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 12:15 AM 0 1 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 12:30 AM 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 12:45 AM 0. 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 Hour Total 0 3 3 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 1:00 AM 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 1:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1:30 AM 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 1 :45 AM 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0, 0 0 2 Hour Total 0 2 6 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 2:00 AM 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2:15 AM 0 2' 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 2:30 AM 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2:45 AM 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 Hour Total 0 5 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 3:00 AM 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 3:15 AM 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 30 AM 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 15 AM 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Hour Total 1 0 4 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 4:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4:15 AM 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 4:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4:45 AM 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Hour Total 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 5:00 AM 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 5:15 AM 0 0 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 5:30 AM 0 0 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 5:45 AM 0 2 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 Hour Total 0 3 10 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 6:00 AM 0 0 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 6:15 AM 0 2 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 6:30 AM 0 3 .8 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 6: 4 5 AM 1 3 10 3 0 0 0- 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 Hour Total 1 8 25 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 40 7:00 AM 0 18 12 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 31 7:15 AM 3 7 14 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 7:30 AM 0 12 16 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 31 7:45 AM 3 1 27 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 48 Hour Total 6 52 69 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 137 I 8:00 AM 1 10 23 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 40 8:15 AM 2 13 22 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 47 8:30 AM 0 25 21 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 51 8:45 AM 0 10 20 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 42 Hour Total 3 _ 58 8.6 33 0 0; 0 0 0 .0 _ 0 0 0 180 9:00 AM 1_ _19 22 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 49 9:15 AM 4 15 28 8 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 56 9:30 AM 1 10 21 9 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 42 9:45 AM 3 15 30 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 57 Hour Total 9 .... .5.9:... 101 3 3.:. _ ..2., .. ,0:.. 0 0 0 0 ... 0 0.•._....,.0 0 204 10:00 AM 3 14 19 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 44 10:15 AM 2 7 23 12 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 45 10:30 AM 1 11 27 6 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 46 10 :45 AM 3 4 24 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 44 Hour Total 9 .... _. 36 < .,.... 93�... 39 1.,.... 1-._ 0 ,r n.. -,.. >... 0...,..._�0 .. 0 0 179 11 :00 AM, 4 15 20 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 44 11:15 AM 4 17 18 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 46 11:30 AM 1 15 26 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 51 11:45 AM 7 15 15 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 47 Hour Total 16 62 79 31 0 . 0 0 0„ 0 0 0 0 0 188 12 :00 PM 11 20 21 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 56 12 :15 PM 5 21 22 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 60 12:30 PM 8 28 19 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 59 12:4 PM 12 24 25 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 68' Hour Total 36 93 87 27 0 0 0 0 0 _ 0 0.... 0 0 243 1:00 PM 7 20 36 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 66 1:15 PM 8 23 29 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 67 1:30 PM 11 19 34 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 68 1:45 PM 5 21 23 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 54 Hour Total_ 31 ,:..,.:83 122 _. 1 9 ;.. .. ,.0... 0 __..0 0.. , >... ._ .•... 0 .. 0 0 255 2:00 PM 8 19 27 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 59 2:15 PM 1 17 24 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 49 2:30 PM 11 18 28 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 59 2: 45 PM 5 11 19 7 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 43 Hour Total 25 65 98 21• 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 210 3 :00 PM 11 16 30 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 65 3 :15 PM 1 13 21 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 38 3:30 PM 6 13 21 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 43 3:45 PM 3 24 37 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 70 Hour Total 21 66 109 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 216 .00 PM 0 9 36 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 51 4:15 PM 5 22 28 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 58 4:30 PM 7 20 28 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 60 4:45 PM 0 18 28 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 52 Hour Total 12 69 120 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 221 5:00 PM 6 13 29 6 0 0 0 0� 0 0 0 0 0 54 5:15 PM 2 20 27 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 53 5:30 PM 4 14 24 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 43 5:45 PM 4 10 23 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 44 Hour Total .16 57 103 18 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 194 6:00 PM 4 21 25 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 51 6:15 PM 2 19 21 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 49 6 :30 PM 2 18 20 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 43 6:45 PM 3 12 25 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 43 Hour Total 11 70 91 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 186 7:00 PM 0 6 17 7 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 31 7:15 PM 1 7 15 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 7:30 PM 0 6 16 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 7:45 PM 1 5 14 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 Hour Total 2 24 62 22 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 112 8:00 PM 2 5 10 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 8:15 PM 1 3 14 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 8:30 PM 0 7 14 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 '-45 PM 0 4 10 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 ur Total 3 19 48 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 90 9:00 PM 1 6 16 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 9:15 PM 0 2 12 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 9:30 PM 0 2 12 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 9:45 PM 0 3 10 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 Hour Total 1 13 50 14 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 79 10:00 PM 1 1 8 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 10:15 PM 0 0 11 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 10:30 PM 1 1 8 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 10:45 PM 0 4 6 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 Hour Total 2 6 33 7 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50 11:00 PM 0 1 4 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 11:15 PM 0 1 6 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 11:30 PM 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 11:45 PM 0 3 11 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 Hour Total 0 5 27 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 39 Totals 205 858 1431 372 9 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2878 Y Speed Report - Prepared by: NDS /ATD University Avenue north of Towne Terrace Los Gatos Project #: 10- 7036 -001n Date:.,,,,,., ... ., 2/.,19/2010:_.,.. North Bound speed Statistics. 15th Percentile Speed 16 MPH Median Speed (50th percentile) 21 MPH -: •, . ,,.,,. . r , . -:_., ..: + i >, <t ^,H Average`Speed All Vehicles 21 MPH 85th Percentile Speed 25 MPH .:, <: 95th Percentile:Speed 28 MPH 10 MPH Pace Speed 15 - 24 MPH _ ... -. ..:.:. Number. of- =Vehicles- Pace.,:.;_. . .._...- ,,2289 Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 79.53% Number of "Vehicles >= 25 MPH 384 Percentage of Vehicles > = 25 MPH 13.34% Prepared by NDS /ATD 2/19/2010 Location: University Avenue north of Towne Terrace City: Los Gatos Project #: 10-7036-001s Start Southbound Hour Totals Northbound Hour Totals Combined Totals Time Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon 12:00 0 0 3 56 12:15 0 0 5 60 12:30 0 0 1 59 12:45 0 0 0 0 2 68 11 243 11 243 1:00 0 0 4 66 1:15 0 0 1 67 1:30 0 0 3 68 1:45 0 0 0 0 2 54 10 255 10 255 2:00 0 0 1 59 2:15 0 0 3 49 2:30 0 0 2 59 .2:45 0 0 0 0 2 43 8 210 8 210 3:00 0 0 1 65 3:15 D 0 3 38 3:30 0 0 2 43 3:45 0 0 0 0 1 70 7 216 7 216 4:00 0 0 0 51 4:15 0 0 1 58 4:30 0 0 0 60 4:45 0 0 0 0 1 52 2 221 2 221 5:00 0 0 1 54 5:15 0 0 5 53 5:30 0 0 5 43 5:45 0 0 0 0 6 44 17 194 17 194 6:00 0 0 4 51 6:15 0 0 7 49 6:30 0 0 12 43 6:45 0 0 0 0 17 43 40 186 40 186 7:00 0 0 31 31 7:15 0 0 27 27 7:30 0 0 31 27 7:45 0 0 0 0 48 27 137 112 137 112 8:00 0 0 40 22 8:15 0 0 47 25 8:30 0 0 51 24 8:45 0 0 0 0 42 19 180 90 180 90 9:00 0 0 49 27 9:15 0 0 56 17 9:30 0 0 42 19 9:45 0 0 0 0 57 16 204 79 204 79 10:00 0 0 44 13 10:15 0 0 45 12 10:30 0 0 46 13 10:45 0 0 0 0 44 12 179 50 179 50 11:00 0 0 44 7 11:15 A 0 46 9 11:30 0 0 51 6 Total Combined Total AM Peak Vol. P.H.F. PM Peak Vol. P.H.F. 0 0 0 Percentage #DIV /0! #DIV /01 0 0 47 17 188 39 188 39 0 0 983 1895 983 1895 983 1895 0 2878 2878 2878 11:45 AM 222 0.925 12:45 PM 269 0.989 34.2% 65.8% Speed Report - Prepared by: NDS/ATD University Avenue north of Towne Terrace Loo Gatos pzo1aot #: 10-7036-001u ' Date: 2/20/2010 oarouzAz North Bound ' --=-- 1 �� zo- us- so- sa- *n- ^s- so- as- so- so- 70- zs Time 14 19 24 29 34 39 44 9 54 59 a* 69 9999 Total 2: 15 am l 0 l 0 0. . 0 o o O n n 0 n u 2: 30 am n o c l o o n o o n O o o s 2: 45 am o z ' o z o ^ n o n o o o o o « 3:0n my O ' 1 0 z o o o n n o n o O 3 z:oO Am 0 c u s 0 n V ` n o O o o n 7 1:15 mm l z 4 n o ` 0 0 u o o 0 ` n V 7 I:30 am o l o O O .o V n o n 0 O O s u^s aa o n s s 0 0 0 0 0. 0 u o n Hour Total 1 5 13 s o u o c' o o o o o zs 2: 00 mm o l s u 0 0 n O 8 o n 0 o y 2: 15 am l 0 l 0 0. . 0 o o O n n 0 n u 2: 30 am n o c l o o n o o n O o o s 2: 45 am o z ' o z o ^ n o n o o o o o « 3:0n my O ' 1 0 z o o o n n o n o O 3 3: 15 AM o 8 l n 0 0 n O n n n o o 1 3'30 AM n o o n n 0 O o o o 0 o n s s:«o am o O s o ' o a n n o o o o n a ^:on ao n l �0 O 0 z n n O o 0 o V 0 1 4: 15 AM o o n o O o o o n o O n n 0 4: 30 AM 0 n z z n n n o O 0 n n 0 o 4: 45 Am o o z u n o o n o o o o n 1 Hour Total 2 23 44 13 2 n o n o o n o o o* V ^o o o o o n u n' 4 5: 00 n o o z Q o .o 0 o o O n u 1 5: 15 mm o .. z . O n o. . . o 'D n o n, u 8 O. z a:soAM l I z o l 0 -o o n o n o o 4 s:xs am n o 4 u o ^ o `o o n o n ' n n 4 6: 15 ma o z y o n o n o 0 o n O O A o: 30 ma n c 2 z l O o n n n 0 u n o 0 o o 0 n o * 7:00 Ao 1 s s 0 1 n o o n o o o 0 ll 7: 15 am U s 9 o U o n n O n 0 0 n zu 7:30 ao o u s 6 n ` 0 0' o o o o n 0 is 7: 45 mm z 14 us s z o n u o o o o o «* Hour Total 2 23 44 13 2 n o n o o n o o o* l 00 AM 1 3 13 9 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 8:15 AM 1 9 12 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 8 :30 AM 1 11 17 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 33 8:45 AM 0 5 20 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 39 Hour Total 3 28 62 29 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 123 9:00 AM 0 4 12 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 9:15 AM 1 12 24 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 41 9:30 AM 4 11 27 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 45 9:45 AM 2 11 22 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 39 Hour Total 7 38 85 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 147 10 :00 AM 4 14 25 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50 10:15 AM 2 10 17 8 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 38 10 :30 AM 3 14 24 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 46 10:45 AM 6 14 18 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 45 Hour Total 15 52 84 27 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 179 11 :00 AM 5 24 20 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 59 11:15 AM 3 10 25 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 44 11:30 AM 5 17 26 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 53 11:45 AM 1 20 19 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 51 Hour Total 14 71 90 30 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 207 12:00 PM 5 27 19 7 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 59 1.2:15 PM 4 22 20 7 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 54 12:30 PM 10 15 21 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 52 2: 45 PM 4 22 34 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 63 ur Total 23 86 94 23 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 228 1:00 PM 4 15 27 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 53 1:15 PM 6 15 25 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 49 1:30 PM 2 18 19 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 48 1:45 PM 7 8 28 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 48 Hour Total 19 56 99 24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 198 2:00 PM 0 17 32 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 60 2:15 PM 4 13 23 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 47 2:30 PM 0 14 24 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 44 2:45 PM 8 15 26 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 56 Hour Total 12 59 105 31 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 207 3:00 PM 5 17 20 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 46 3:15 PM 8 18 16 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 48 3:30 PM 4 14 26 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 51 3:45 PM 5 17 19 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 46 Hour Total 22 66 81 22 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 191 4'00 om 8 zy ua 4 n ' o u U n o n n o 64 ` «:ls PM z 17 cO 4 z n 8 n 0 0 o o O 45 * an PM 5 10 uz 7 o o n O o o n o O «o O 0 52 5: 00 eo s lO 1p s O o o O o o n o o 37 5: 15 pm 5 12 zl 4 o o o 0 n O 0 o O 42 5: 30 cm a 7 lo 5 O O 8 o 0 o O O o zs 6: 00 PM O 7 19 4 O O 0 o O V O O 0 30 6: 15 PM s 7 is 3 O 0 D n n O o 0 O 28 6: 30 em n 7 20 1 U n a O o n o n O cn 27 non PM 0 y 13 z 0 n o o o n 8 o 0 c« 7:l5 PM o 7 10 o n o O O n 0 O O 0 ly 7: 30 PM 0 zO l^ z 0 0 o 0 0 O o n n 26 8 al 8:00 PM o zo zo 4 n n o o 0 n O n o 38 8:15 PM l c 12 a O n n o u 0 o 0 0 cn o:no em u 7 7 1 z n n o o o 0 o o zo / 9:00 em O 7 11 c n o o u n o n o 0 cn y:zs Pm o s 11 s o o o n O 0 o n O 17 9:30 em z 8 10 o o V o O n 0 0 O O us 0 zn:no eM o 2 4 s n O n o o o o o 0 y zO|ln PM n 6 n 3 O o o .o o V n n n ln 10:30 eo n 1 7 o n 0 o 0 o n n o n 8 10 ~ 4 11:00 my V u 7 l o 0 O n n o 0 u n 10 D:ls PM O 4 o n 0 n n o n 0 n o 0 n 11:30 PM z I 6 * 0 n o n o U o 0 n lz O 0 0 o o a Totals 16o 727 1230 347 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2486 Speed Report - Prepared by: NDS /ATD University Avenue north of Towne Terrace Los Gatos Project #: 10- 7036 -001n Date: 2/20/2010 North Hound Sneed Statistics, 15th Percentile Speed Median Speed (50th percentile) Average Speed - All Vehicles 85th Percentile Speed 95th Percentile Speed 10 MPH Pace Speed Number of Vehicles in Pace Percentage of Vehicles in Pace Number of Vehicles >= 25 MPH Percentage of Vehicles >= 25 MPH 16 MPH 21 MPH 21 MPH 25 MPH 28 MPH 15 -- 2.4 MPH 1957 78.72% 361 14.52% Prepared by NDS/ATD 2/20/2010 City: Los Gatos Project #: 10-7036-001s Location: University Avenue north of Towne Terrace Start Southbound Hour Totals Northbound Hour Totals Combined Totals Time Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon 12:00 0 0 6 59 12:15 0 0 7 54 12:30 0 0 12 52 12:45 0 0 0 0 5 63 30 228 30 228 1:00 0 0 7 53 1:15 0 0 7 49 1:30 0 0 6 48 1:45 0 0 0 0 6 48 25 198 25 198 2:00 0 0 9 60, 2:15 0 0 21 47 2:30 0 0 3 44 2:45 0 0 0 0 4 56 18 207 18 207 3:00' 0 0 3:15 0 0 1 48 'l ei 3:36 o 0 3 3:45 0 0 0 0 3, 46. :.-10 191 10 191 4.00 <: � 0 0 1 64 4:15 ".: 0 0 0 45 4M 0 0 2 44 4: 45 0 0 0 0 I 52 '4 2 05 4 205 5 0 0 1 37,. 5:15 0 0 1 6:30 0 0 4 25 5:45 0 0 0 0 4 32 10 136 10 136 6:00 0 0 5 30 6:15 0 0 4 28 6:30 0 0 6 28 6:46 0 0 0 0 4 : :27 19 118 19 113 7:00 0 0 11 24 7:15 0 0 14 19 7:30 0 0 15 26 7:45 0 0 0 0 44 31 84 100 84 100 8:00 0 0 27 38 8:15 0 0 24 20 8:30 0 0 33 18 8:45 0 0 0 0 39 15 123 91 123 91 9:00 0 0 22 20 9:15 0 0 41 17 0:30 0 0 45 23 9:45 0 0 0 0 39 16 147 76 147 76 10:00 0 0 50 9 10:15 0 0 38 18 10:30 0 0 46 8 10:45 0 0 0 0 45 15 179 50 179 50 11:00 0 0 59 10 11:15 0 0 44 8 11:30 0 0 53 12 11:45 0 0 0 0 51 5 207 35 207 35 0 0 856 1630 856 1630 Total 0 0 856 1630 Combined 0 0 2486 2486 2486 Total AM Peak 11:30 AM Vol. 217 P.H.F. 0,919 PM Peak 12:00 PM Vol. 228 P.H.F. 0.906 Percentage #DIV/01 #DIV/01 34.4% 65.6% ! Speed Report - Prepared by: NDS /ATD University Avenue north of Towne Terrace Los Gatos r , Project #: 10- 7036 -001n Date: 2/20/2010 SATURDAY North Bound Begin 5- 15- 20- 25- 30- 35- 40- 45- 50- 55- 60- 65- 70- Time 14 19 24 29 34 39 44 .49 54 59 64 69 9999 Total 12:00 AM 0 0 4 2 0 0 0, 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 12:15 AM 1 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 12:30 AM 0 2 8 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 12:45 AM 1 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 Hour Total 2 2 20 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 :00 AM 0 2 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 1:15 AM 1 2 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 1:30 AM 0 1 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 1:45 AM 0 0 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 Hour Total 1 5 13 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 2:00 AM 0 1 6 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 2:15 AM 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2:30 AM 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 2:45 AM 0 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4• Hour Total 1 2 11 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18 3 :00 AM 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 3 3:15 AM 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 •30 AM 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 45 AM 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 Hour Total 0 1 7 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 4:00 AM 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 4 :15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 :30 AM 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 4:45 AM. 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Hour Total 0 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 5:00 AM 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 5:15 AM 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 5:30 AM 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 5:45 AM 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 Hour Total 1 2 5 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 6 :00 AM 0 1 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 6:15 AM 0 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 6:30 AM 0 2 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 6:45 AM 0 0 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 Hour Total 0 4 12 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 7 :00 AM 1 3 6 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 7:15 AM 0 3 9 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 7:30 AM 0 3 6 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 7:45 AM 1 14 23 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 44 Hour Total 2 23 44 13 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 84 8: 00 Am z s 13 p l n n O o o o o o 27 8: 15 AM 1 9 lc z o o o o u 0 O O u 24 8: 30 AM z zz 17 « o o 8 o o o o o n 33 o:os ua u n zn 14 o o o o o o. o n o se c:so mm o m uo s n n 0 o O O o n n 44 9: 00 AM _ '-0_ -4 lo 6 0 V - .o'.- 0 V .8- » g ' o '.' _ 9: 15 am 1 12 24 4 O O n O O 0 O n 0 «l 9'3n mm * zz 27 a o 0 o O 0 o O n n 45 y: 4s AM 2 zz ou « n n o o o o o o n sp 3: 30 PM 4 z* 26 ? n o n n o o O Q o sz 10: 00 Am 4 I^ 25 7 O U 0 O 0 o n 8 o SO 10: 15 my 2 zo 17 o z o n O o o o O 0 38 10: 30 AM 3 14 oa s o O O o o 0 o 0 O 46 10: 45 AM s z« 18 7 o O o o o n o o o os ~~~^ Tot � -� - 52 ,. .==-~ �7 ` �~` - ~ ~^-------------� - '— - 11:00 um s 24 20 lO O O O O O o O 0 O 59 zz:ln Am 3 lo 25 h 0 o n 0 o 0 o o n 44 ll:so am s 17 cs o o O u n n n n O o 53 zz I cn ly D o o U 0 n o 0 n o sl zc:oo PM s 27 19 7 l 0 O n o 0 U o o 59 12:15 PM u eo 20 7 z n o n O O 0 o 8 a« zz:zo mm zo zo ol G 0 0 o O n O 0 o n 52 12:45 mm o za 34 s n o n o o 0. o n n as / Hour Total 23 86 94 23 2 �^8-. -_�_ -V ,~V ` -_ 0 11 0 .1 cuV \ 1: 00 em 1: 15 sa 1: 30 po 1: 45 vs « 6 u 7 15 ls zn a 27 zo zp za 7 s y s o 0 0 n o o o n o o o 0 n n o o O o o o O o 8 . n O O o o n n 0 n 0 o 0 o 53 oy *8 48 Hour Total 19 2 0 . 0 198 2: 00 mn o 17 ao D 0 O 0 o n o o o 0 80 z: 15 PM 4 zs 23 7 n o 0 0 o o o n n m c:so mm o m uo s n n 0 o O O o n n 44 2:«u em m zo 26 7 o V n o n n o o o 56 3: 00 em s o 20 « 0 o 0 n n 0 0 o n 46 3: 15 mm 8 18 16 a o o o O o 0 0 n 0 4n 3: 30 PM 4 z* 26 ? n o n n o o O Q o sz s: 45 PM 5 17 19 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 46 .00 PM 8 29 23 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 64 4:15 PM 3 17 20 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 45 4:30 PM 5 10 22 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 44 4:45 PM 4 10 27 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 52 Hour Total 20 66 92 26 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 205 5:00 PM 3 10 18 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 37 5 :15 PM 5 12 21 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 42 5:30 PM 3 7 10 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 5:45 PM 1 7 15 .8 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 32 Hour Total 12 36 64 23 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 136 6:00 PM 0 7 19 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - 0 30 6:15 PM 3 7 15 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 28 6 :30 PM 0 7 20 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 28 6:45 PM 1 5 14 7 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 27 Hour Total 4 26 68 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 113 7:00 PM 0 9 13 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 7:15 PM 0 7 10 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 7:30 PM 0 10 14 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 26 7:45 PM 1 12 18 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 31 Hour Total 1 38 55 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 8.:00 PM 4 12 18 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 38 8::15 PM 1 2 12 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 8:30 PM 2 7 7 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18 45 PM 0 3 8 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 ,ur Total 7 24 45 14 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 91 9:00 PM 0 7 11 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 9:15 PM 0 3 11 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 9:30 PM 1 8 10 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 9:45 PM 0 5 9 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 Hour Total 1 23 41 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 76 10:00 PM 0 2 4 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 10:15 PM 0 6 9 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18 10:30 PM 0 1 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 10:45 PM 0 2 10 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 Hour Total 0 11 30 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50 11:00 PM 0 2 7 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 11:15 PM 0 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 11:30 PM 1 1 6 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 11:45 PM 0 0 4 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 Hour Total 1 7 21 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 35 Totals 168 727 1230 347 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2486 Speed Report - Prepared by: NDS/ATD University Avenue north of Towne Terrace Los Gatos Project #: 10-7036-001n Date,:. .., 2/20/2010, North Bound Speed Statistics. 15th Percentile Speed 16 MPH Median Speed (50th percentile) 21 MPH Average Speed = AllLVehicleS 21. . P 85th Percentile Speed 2.5 MPH 95th Percentile Speed 28 MPH 10 MPH Pace Sp6ed 15 - 24 MPH Number 6f Pace-- - 1957 Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 78.72% Number of Vehicles >= 25 MPH 361 Percentage of Vehicles >= 25 MPH 14.52% r r �. Prepared by NDS /ATD 2/20/2010 City: Los Gatos Project #: 10- 7036 -001s Location: University Avenue north of Towne Terrace Start Southbound Hour Totals Northbound Hour Totals Combined Totals Time Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon 12:00 0 0 6 59 12:15 0 0 7 54 12:30 0 0 12 52 12:45 0 0 0 0 5 63 30 228 30 228 1:00 0 0 7 53 1:15 0 0 7 49 1:30 0 0 5 48 1:45 0 0 0 0 6 48 25 198 25 198 2:00 0 0 9 60 2:15 0 0 2 47 2:30 0 0 3 44 2:45 0 0 0 0 4 56 18 207 18 207 3:00 0 0 3 46 3:15 0 0 1 48 3:30 0 0 3 51 3:45 0 D 0 0 3 46 10 191 10 191 4:00 0 0 1 64 4:15 0 0 0 45 4:30 0 0 2 44 4:45 0 0 0 0 1 52 4 205 4 205 5:00 0 0 1 37 5:15 0 0 1 42 5:30 0 0 4 25 5:45 0 0 0 0 4 32 10 136 10 136 6:00 0 0 5 30 6:15 0 0 4 28 6:30 0 0 6 28 6:45 0 0 0 0 4 27 19 113 19 113 7:00 0 0 11 24 7:15 0 0 14 19 7:30 0 0 15 26 7:45 0 0 0 0 44 31 84 100 84 100 8 :00 0 0 27 38 8:15 0 0 24 20 8:30 0 0 33 18 8:45 0 0 0 0 39 15 123 91 123 91 9:00 0 0 22 20 9:15 0 0 41 17 9:30 0 0 45 23 9:45 0 0 0 0 '39 16 147 76 147 76 10:00 0 0 50 9 10:15 0 0 38 18 10:30 0 0 46 8 10:45 0 0 0 0 45 15 179 50 179 50 11:00 0 0 59 10 11:15 0 0 44 8 11:30 0 0 53 12 11:45 0 0 0 0 51 5 207 35 207 35 Total 0 0 0 0 856 1630 856 1630 856 1630 Combined Total 0 0 2486 2486 2486 AM Peak 11:30 AM Vol. 217 P.H.F. 0.919 PM Peak 12:00 PM Vol 228 P.H.F. 0,905 Percentage #DIV /01 #DIV /01 34.4% 65.6% s ' rg Speed Report Prepared by: NDS /ATD University Avenue north of Towne Terrace Los Gatos _ Project 4: 10- 7036 -001n Date: 2/21/2010 SUNDAY North Bound Begin 5- 15 -., 20 -,.. 25- 30- .35- `40- 45- 5,0- 55- 60- 65- 70- Time 14 19 24 29 34 39 44 49 54 59- 64 69 9999 Total 12 :00 AM 0 1 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 " 0 6 12:15 AM 0 2 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 12:30 AM 0` 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0, 0 0 0 4 12:45 AM 0. 0 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 Hour Total 0 5 10 3 1 0 ;: 0 0 0 01, 0 0 0 19 1 :00 AM 0 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 1:15 AM 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 0 0 0 1 1:30 AM 0 ,;, 0 4 .. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0, 0: 0 .0 4 1:45 AM 0 2 3 1 1 S;'= 0 0 0 0 0`: 0.:: 0 ::.0 7 Hour Total 0 3 11 1 1 0 0 0 0 W. 0 0 0 16 2:00 AM 1 1 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0- 0 0 0 6 2:15 AM 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0: 0 t 0 0 4 2:30 AM 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0' 0' 0 0 3 2:45 AM 0` 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 Hour Total 1 2 8 5 0 0 0 0 0 0. 0 0 0 16 3:00 AM 0 0= 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0; 0 0 0 1 3:15 AM 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0' 0 0 0 1 3:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0•` 0 0 0 0 3:45 AM 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0. - 0 0 0 3 Hour Total 2 1 0 2 0 0 - -0 0 0 0:; 0 0 f.0 5 4:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4:4.5 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 ;.. -0 0 0 0;: 0 0 0. 0 Hour Total 0 0 0 0 0 =` 0 "0 0 0 0- 0• 0 0 0 5 :00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 ;. 0 ..0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5:15 AM 0: -,.. 1 ;: 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0_ 0 ,•. 0 & 2 5:30 AM 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 &; 3 5:45 AM 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0' 0 0 0 1 Hour Total 0 2 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0. 0. 0 0, 6 6:00 AM 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 6:15 AM 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 6:30 AM 0 1 2 0 0 0 0` 0 0 0 0 0 0` 3 6:45 AM 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0.. 2' Hour Total 0 2 4 3 0 0'! 0 0 0 0 0 0 0- 9 7:00 AM 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 7 :15 AM 0 0 1 3 0 0., 0, 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 7:30 AM 0 0 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 7 :45 AM 1 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 Hour Total 1 2 7 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 _:00 AM 0 1 5 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 B:15 AM 0 5 8 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 15 8:30 AM 0 2 11 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 8:45 AM. 0 6 9 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 Hour Total 0 14 33 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 56 9:00 AM 0 6 14 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 9:15 AM 6 9 11 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 28 9:30 AM 1 6 13 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 9:45 AM 0 11 18 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 31 Hour Total 7 32 56 7 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 103 10:00 AM 2 8 21 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 36 10:15 Am 2 16 22 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 46 10:30 AM 0 13 18 11 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 43 10:.45 AM 6 14 18 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 41 Hour Total 10 51 79 24 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 166 11 :00 AM 6 12 18 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 40 11:15 AM 2 16 19 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 39 11:30 AM 1 7 20 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 29 11:45 AM 3 14 15 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 37 Hour Total 12 49 72 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 145 12:00 PM 3 7 12 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 28 12:15 PM 3 9 19 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 38 12:30 PM 5 14 14 8 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 43 1 :45 PM 7 19 17 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 45 jur Total 18 49 62 23 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 154 1:00 PM 2 10 26 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 44 1:15 PM 1 8 22 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 38 1 :30 PM 1 16 16 9 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 43 1:45 PM 6 11 22. 9 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 49 Hour Total 10 45 86 30 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 174 2:00 PM 1 15 18 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 38 2:15 PM 3 9 25 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 42 2:30 PM 3 5 21 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 34 2:45 PM 0 12. 20 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 41 Hour Total 7 41 84 20 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 155 3:00 PM 4 9 21 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 37 3:15 PM 3 12 27 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50 3:30 PM 3 14 24 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 47 3:45 PM 1 20 27 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 51 Hour Total 11 55 99 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1B5 ^:oo mm 7 23 zp o o 0 O O 0 o n o 0 uu 4: 15 pm 9 24 17 z o o o 0 o 0 n 0 0 uz «`ao mm l n cz s n O 0 o o o 0 o n ao _:_ __ 5: 00 ca o 9 19 4 l o o o o O o 0 0 37 5: 15 pm z 3 6 x 0 o o 0 n o O O o 13 5: 30 PM n 0 o O o O 0 o o O O n o O O s:00 PM 0 0 o o o 0 O O u o n O 0 U 6: 15 pm 0 o o 8 O o O 0 n o O O O n 6:3o eM n Q 0 0 O o O n n 8 O 0 O o -- O 7:O0 ro 0 n n o o n o O 0 o o 0 n o 7:1s PM 8 o n o n n o n n U ' o 0 o o 7:a0 am o 8 0 O O O n O o o 0 o O O 8: 00 PM O n o n o 0 V o n o o n o n 8: 15 ma o o 0 o n o 0 O n O 0 o o n 8: 30 PM 0 n n n u 0 0 o 0 n n o O 0 / n n o o n o o o o o ` 9: 00 em o O O n o o O o n o 0 o o o 9: 15 PM n n o n o n o n n n O o 0 0 o:30 am n V o n n o n o n o n n o o zo:On PM U 0 n o o o o n O — o n o n n 10: 15 ax o o n O 0 0 0 O n n 0 0 o o 10: 30 em V n n 0 o n o n 0 n 8 n o n zz:Uu mm O o o n o o o o n 0 n o o n 11:15 em o o o O o n 0 o o 0 01 0 0 o 11:30 em o n O 0 0 n o o n o n o o n 0 rota13 104 434 721 183 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1456 Speed Report - Prepared by: NDS /ATD University Avenue north of Towne Terrace Los Gatos Project #: 10- 7036 -001n Date: 2/21/2010 North Bound Sneed Statistics.. 15th Percentile Speed Median Speed (50th percentile) Average Speed - All Vehicles 85th Percentile Speed 95th Percentile Speed 10 MPH Pace Speed Number of Vehicles in Pace Percentage of Vehicles in Pace Number of Vehicles >= 25 MPH Percentage of Vehicles >= 25 MPH .. 16 MPH 21 MPH 21 MPH 25 MPH 28 MPH 15 - 24 MPH 1155 79.33% 197 13.5.3% Prepared by NDS/ATD 2/21/2010 -: City: Los Gatos Project#:.-, 10- 7036 -001s Location: University Avenue north of Towne Terrace Start Southbound Hour Totals Northbound Hour Totals Combined Totals Time Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon 12:00 0 0 6 28 12:15 0 0 4 38 12:30 0 0 - 4 43 12:45 0 0 0 0 5 45 19 154 19 164 1:00 0 0 4 44 1:15 0 0 1 38 1:30 0 0 4 43 1:45 0 0 0 0 7 49 16 174 16 174 2:00 0 0 6 38 2:15 0 0 4 42 2:30 0 0 3 34 2:45 0 0 0 0 3 41 16 155 16 155 3:00 0 0 1.. 37.. 1 3:15 0 0 1 b0 3:3 0 0 0 47 3:45 0 0 0 0 3 51 5 185 5 185 4. 00 0 0 0 52 4:1 0 0 4: . 30 0 0 0 36 4:4W- 0 0 0 0 0'.- 41, = 0 180 0 180 0 0 0 37 0 0 2 5:30 0 0 3 0 . 5:45 0 0 0 0 1 0 6 50 6 50 6:00 0 0 2 0 6:15 0 0 2 D 6:30 0 0 3 0 6:45 0 0 0 0 2 0 '9 0 9 0 7:00 0 0 2 0 7:15 0 0 4 0 7:30 0 0 5 0 7:45 0 0 0 0 6 0 17 0 17 0 8:00 0 0 8 0 8:15 0 0 15 0 8:30 0 0 14 0 8:45 0 0 0 0 19 0 56 0 56 0 9:00 0 0 22 0 9:15 0 0 28 0 9:30 0 0 22 0 9:45 0 0 0 0 31 0 103 0 103 0 10:00 0 0 36 0 10:15 0 0 46 0 10:30 0 0 43 0 10:45 0 0 0 0 41 0 166 0 166 0 11:00 0 0 40 0 11:15 0 0 39 0 11:30 0 0 29 D 11:45 0 0 0 0 37 0 145 b 145 0 Total 0 0 0 0 558 898 558 898 558 898 Combined 0 0 1456 1456 1456 Total AM Peak 10:15 AM Vol. 170 P.H.F. 0.924 PM Peak 3:30 PM Vol, 201 P.H.F. 0.966 Percentage #DIV/01 #DIV/01 38.3% 61.7% TJKM Transportation Consultants COMPARE Wed Mar 10 06:54:54 2010 Page 3 -1 p2008 Los Gatos Street Network. Using the CMP2000HCM Operatlonsology Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations (Base Volume Alternative) Existing - AM Peak Intersection #1: University Ave. /Blossom Hill Rd. Signal= Permit/Righls =l nclude Base Vol: 25 64 86 Lanes: A, 1 0 1 0 1 4 �* 10- Slgnal = Protect Slgnal = Protect Base Vol: Lanes: Rights= Include Vol Cnl Date: 2/10/2010 Rights= Include Lanes: Base Vol: j Cycle Time (sec): 100 37 +++ 1 _ 0 140 Loss Time (sec): 9 0 1 296 1 Critical V /C: 0.503 1 597'" 1 Avg Cdl Del (seclveh): 18.4 0 21 0 Avg Delay(sec /veh): 22.8 1 157 LOS C ++ I I Lanes: 0 1 0 0 1 Base Vol: 80 97+" 133 Slgnal= Permlt/Rlghts =l nclude Street Name: University Ave. Blossom Hill Rd. Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R II--------------- L - T - R II---- L - T - R - - - - - I ------------ I--------------- Min. Green: 10 10 II--------------- 10 10 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 Y +R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 LI--------- 4.0 4.0 4.0 I1--------------- 4.0 4.0 4.0 I ------------ I--------------- Volume Module: >> Count II- - - --- - -------- Date: 10 Feb 2010 Base Vol: 80 97 133 86 64 25 37 296 21 157 597 140 Growth Adj: 1.07 1.07 1.'07 1.07 1.07 1.07 1.07 1.07 -1.07 1.07 1.07 1.07 Initial Bse: 86 104 142 92 68 27 40 317 22 168 639 150 User Adj: 1.40 1.40 1.40 1.72 1.72 1.72 1.25 1.25 1.25 1.35 1.35 1.35 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 120 145 199 158 118 46 49 396 28 227 862 202 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 120 145 199 158 118 46 49 396 28 227 862 202 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 120 145 199 158 118 46 II--------------- I' 49 396 I--------------- 28 II---------- 227 862 202 - - - - - I ------------ I --------------- Saturation Flow Module: Sat /Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 "1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 Lanes: 0.47 0.53 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.86 0.14 1.00 1.59 0.41 Final Sat.: 827 1002 1750 1750 1900 1750 II--------------- II--------------- 1750 3528 250 II----------- 1750 3029 710 - - - - I' ------------ I --------------- Capacity Analysis Module: Vol /Sat: 0.14 0,14 0.11 0.09 0.06 0.03 0.03 0.11 0.11 0.13 0.28 0.28 Crit Moves: * * ** * * ** * * ** Green Time: 28.3 28.3 28.3 28.3 28.3 28.3 7.0 29.1 29.1 33.6 55.7 55.7 Volume /Cap: 0.51 0.51 0.40 0.32 0.22 0.09 0.40 0.39 0.39 0.39 0.51 0.51 Delay /Veh: 30.9 30.9 29.5 28.6 27,6 26.5 46.7 28.6 28.6 25.8 14.0 14.0 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Del /Veh: 30.9 30.9 29.5 28.6 27.6 26.5 46.7 28.6 28.6 25.8 14.0 14.0 LOS by Move: C C C C C C D C C C B B HCM2k85thQ: 11 11 9 7 4 2 2 8 8 9 15 15 Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. Traffix B.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc, Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON. CA COMPARE i Wed Mar 10 06:54:54 2010 Page 3 -2 - 2008 Los Gatos Street Network Using the CMP 2000 HCM 4 -Way Stopology Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM 4 -Way Stop (Base Volume Alternative) _ Existing - PM Peak Intersection #1: University Ave. /Blossom Hill Rd. Sig nal =Permit/Rights= Include Base Vol: 66 131 161*** Lanes: 1 0 1 0 1 r Signal= Protect - Slgnal= Protect Base Vol: Lanes: Rs= Include Vol Cnt Dater 2/10/2010 Rights= Include Lanes: Base Vol: Cycle Time (sec): 100 37 1 0 44 Loss Time jsec): 9 D 1 378 1 CriticalV /C: 0,374 1 392 1 Avg Cdt Del (sec /veh): 26.1 0 27 0 Avg Delay {sec /veh): 25.0 1 126*** LOS: C I Lanes: 0 1 0 0 1 Base Vol: 54 71 172 Slgnal= Permlt/Rights =l nclude Street Name: University Ave. Blossom Hill Rd. Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - ----------- I --------------- T - R II L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Min. Green: 10 10 10 10 10 II--------------- 10 7 10 II---------- 10 7 10 - - - - - I 10 Y +R: 4.0 ------------ I -------------- - 4.0 4.0 II--------------- 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Volume Module: >> Count Date: II--------------- 10 Feb 2010 << II---------- - - - - - I Base Vol: 54 71 172 161 131 66 37 378 27 126 392 44 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 54 71 172 161 131 66 37 378 27 126 392 44 User Adj: 1.25 1.25 1.25 1.34 1.34 1.34 1.25 1.25 1.25 1.15 1.15 1.15 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 68 89 215 216 176 88 46 473 34 145 451 51 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 68 89 215 216 176 88 46 473 34 145 451 51 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 68 ------------ I -------- - - ----- 89 215 II 216 176 88 46 473 34 145 451 51 Saturation Flow Module: 11---------------- II --------- ---- - -- I Sat /Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 .0.92 Lanes: 0.45 0.55 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.86 0.14 1.00 1.78 0.22 Final.Sat.: 791 ------------ I --------------- 1041 1750 II ------- - -- ----- 1750 1900 1750 1750 3527 252 1750 3387 380 Capacity Analysis Module: II--------------- II---------- - - - - - I Vol /Sat: 0.09 0.09 0.12 0.12 0.09 0.05 0.03 0.13 0.13 0.08 0.13 0.13 Crit Moves: * * ** * * ** * * ** Green Time: 33.0 33.0 33.0 33.0 33.0 33.0 20.0 35.9 35.9 22.2 38.0 38.0 Volume /Cap: 0.26 0.26 0.37 0.37 0.28 0.15 0.13 0.37 0.37 0.37 0.35 0.35 Delay /Veh: 24.8 24.8 26.0 26.0 25.0 23.8 33.0 23.9 23.9 33.6 22.3 22.3 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Del /Veh: 24.8 24.8 26.0 26.0 25.0 23.8 33.0 23.9 23.9 33.6 22.3 22.3 LOS by Move: C C C C C C C- C C C- C+ C+ HCM2k85thQ: 6 6 9 9 6 3 2 8 8 6 8 8 Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. Traffx 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA Intersection #2: University Ave./Roberts Rd. ^` ^ Base Vol: 26 212... 3 Lanes: o o 11 « « Base ol: Lanes: m o -/ � » m o m ~ o Rlghts=lnclU&e Lanes: �- Lanes: o o it o o Base Vol: 39 285 49 Base Vol: ' o ' � x0^ . � w Street Name: University Ave. ' Roberts Rd. ' Approach: North Bound '�outu Bound East Bound ' West Bound Movement: L - z - u z - z - �R L - r - u L - c - a ------------ | --------------- || --------------- ||--------------- ---------| muu. oz*eu: 0 0 ` o ` n 0 '0 0 o 0 O n n ---------- ----- ----------| |---------------||--------------| voznmo Module: >> Count Date: ln Feb 2010 �< � Base Vol: 39 285, ^y o ulc cs 19 16 40 41 zo zo Growth auj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.06 1.00 1.00 1.0 1 . 00 z-ou 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial 000/ sy oAs 49 1 s cic 26 19 16 «O 41 20 zx User Auj'i-` 1.00 1 �00 1.00 l' 1�00 1.00 I.00 1.00 z.0} 1 b i bo l.00 ' roF auj: ^ 1.00 1.00 1.00 z.00 I.do 1.00 1.00 1 0 1.00 1.00- 1.00 1.00 eor vozo6e: jn zas' 49 -`�3' 212 uo Iy 16 40: oi 20 Ic ' uadoot Vol: o 0 u � n 0 0 ' 0 0 O n o^ nrdooeu vol: os zos 49 .3 212 26 19 zn '40 41 20 roE Auj: ` 1.00 l.O0 l.nu I.-on z.00 z. UV 1.00 1. 00 z. 00 1.00 1.00 1.00 mLr Auj: ^ z.0O z 1.00 1.00 1.00 z oU 1.00 1'00 z.UO � l.0o I. - on 1.00 ripa : ^ ��z ` ' sy ��s �9 � �� �e is �V �wi uo l2 � ` ,. ` ------�1�-|--^---�--------||-����-�------�- ||------------' ��- --||- -- ----�-�| u : ' z.n0 l.no 1.0o 1.on l.O0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.80 1'n0 Lanes: ��� o:i0o.77` 0/13 n'o� n�AA n�j�� 0���o��1 0. 54-: o���'O. 0.16' Final . oat uu' 597 103 9 6b1 `Az 16z/ 136 ' 339: nuo 166 znV' ------------ |--------------- ||------- -------- ||----�--�-�---�-||--=-----_-----| Capacity Analysis vol/aat. 0.48 O.*o 0.48 0.32 0.32 0.32 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 +++ +++* . nrit Moves: ++++ ++*+ ° zl.« 11.4 -11.4 9.7 9.7 9.7 8'7 8.7 8.7 9.0 9.0 e.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 l'un 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Dela D.411.4 11,4. 0.71 ' 5.i 9.7 8.7 8�7 o.7 9.0 e.0 9.9 LOS by M6ve: - ^ �s `B' A '^�A a 'a� ` `a a a a Approachl�el 11.4 ' ` 9c7 8.7 9.0 ^1.00 . 1.00 - l.00 ^ 1.00 'l�.o ` 9 ��1 ' 9.0 LOS ` ' : s A ' A a alzWa� ' : 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.4 0.* 0.4 8.1 O'I 0.1 0.1 o.z 0.1 Note: Queue reported is the onobor of cars per lane. Peak Hour Volume Signal Warrant Report [Urban) Intersection #2 ouivoz=itv Ave./Roberts Pd. oaoo Volume Alternative: Peak Ho uz Warrant NOT Met -�---------- |--------------- ||--------------- || ---------------- ||--------------- | App North u ',nmumo _. Cycle The xm Loss The (s6c): » Crltical ` oxr Av omDel 10.3 - /Av g Delay mec/�e�V 10.3 mo o Rlghts=lnclU&e Lanes: �- Lanes: o o it o o Base Vol: 39 285 49 Base Vol: ' o ' � x0^ . � w Street Name: University Ave. ' Roberts Rd. ' Approach: North Bound '�outu Bound East Bound ' West Bound Movement: L - z - u z - z - �R L - r - u L - c - a ------------ | --------------- || --------------- ||--------------- ---------| muu. oz*eu: 0 0 ` o ` n 0 '0 0 o 0 O n n ---------- ----- ----------| |---------------||--------------| voznmo Module: >> Count Date: ln Feb 2010 �< � Base Vol: 39 285, ^y o ulc cs 19 16 40 41 zo zo Growth auj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.06 1.00 1.00 1.0 1 . 00 z-ou 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial 000/ sy oAs 49 1 s cic 26 19 16 «O 41 20 zx User Auj'i-` 1.00 1 �00 1.00 l' 1�00 1.00 I.00 1.00 z.0} 1 b i bo l.00 ' roF auj: ^ 1.00 1.00 1.00 z.00 I.do 1.00 1.00 1 0 1.00 1.00- 1.00 1.00 eor vozo6e: jn zas' 49 -`�3' 212 uo Iy 16 40: oi 20 Ic ' uadoot Vol: o 0 u � n 0 0 ' 0 0 O n o^ nrdooeu vol: os zos 49 .3 212 26 19 zn '40 41 20 roE Auj: ` 1.00 l.O0 l.nu I.-on z.00 z. UV 1.00 1. 00 z. 00 1.00 1.00 1.00 mLr Auj: ^ z.0O z 1.00 1.00 1.00 z oU 1.00 1'00 z.UO � l.0o I. - on 1.00 ripa : ^ ��z ` ' sy ��s �9 � �� �e is �V �wi uo l2 � ` ,. ` ------�1�-|--^---�--------||-����-�------�- ||------------' ��- --||- -- ----�-�| u : ' z.n0 l.no 1.0o 1.on l.O0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.80 1'n0 Lanes: ��� o:i0o.77` 0/13 n'o� n�AA n�j�� 0���o��1 0. 54-: o���'O. 0.16' Final . oat uu' 597 103 9 6b1 `Az 16z/ 136 ' 339: nuo 166 znV' ------------ |--------------- ||------- -------- ||----�--�-�---�-||--=-----_-----| Capacity Analysis vol/aat. 0.48 O.*o 0.48 0.32 0.32 0.32 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 +++ +++* . nrit Moves: ++++ ++*+ ° zl.« 11.4 -11.4 9.7 9.7 9.7 8'7 8.7 8.7 9.0 9.0 e.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 l'un 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Dela D.411.4 11,4. 0.71 ' 5.i 9.7 8.7 8�7 o.7 9.0 e.0 9.9 LOS by M6ve: - ^ �s `B' A '^�A a 'a� ` `a a a a Approachl�el 11.4 ' ` 9c7 8.7 9.0 ^1.00 . 1.00 - l.00 ^ 1.00 'l�.o ` 9 ��1 ' 9.0 LOS ` ' : s A ' A a alzWa� ' : 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.4 0.* 0.4 8.1 O'I 0.1 0.1 o.z 0.1 Note: Queue reported is the onobor of cars per lane. Peak Hour Volume Signal Warrant Report [Urban) Intersection #2 ouivoz=itv Ave./Roberts Pd. oaoo Volume Alternative: Peak Ho uz Warrant NOT Met -�---------- |--------------- ||--------------- || ---------------- ||--------------- | App North u { COMPARE wed Mar '1006:64:54 2010 Page 3 -4 Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - - I Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Stop Sign Stop Sign Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 Initial Vol: 39 285 49 3 212 26 19 16 40 41 20 12 ------------ I --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - - I Major Street Volume: 614 Minor Approach Volume: 75 Minor Approach Volume Threshold: 349 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SIGNAL WARRANT DISCLAIMER This peak hour signal warrant analysis should be considered solely as an "indicator" of the likelihood of an unsignalized intersection warranting a traffic signal in the future. Intersections that exceed this warrant are probably more likely to meet one or more of the other volume based signal warrant (such as the 4 -hour or 8 -hour warrants). The,peak hour warrant analysis in this report is not intended to replace a rigorous and complete traffic signal warrant analysis by the responsible jurisdiction. Consideration of the other signal warrants, which is beyond the scope of this software may yield different results. Traffix8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA Intersection #2: University Ave, /Roberts Rd. Slgnal= S1op1Righls =l nclude Base Vol: 20' 202 11 Lanes: 0 0 11 0, 0 - Slgnal =Slop Slgnal =Stop Base Vol: Lanes: Rights= Include Vol Cnt Dale: 2/1012010 Rights Ihclude Lanes: Base Vol: Cycle Tlme (sec): 100 19 0 .. - _ 0 .,.� 7 - .. Loss Time (sec); ., 0 p 0 19'" 11 Cdtical V /C: 0.434 _ 11 11'*' 0 Avg Crit Del (seclyeh):_ 10 3 , ;. _ 0 57 0 Avg Delay {sec /veh):. 10,3 0 41 LOS: B " I Lanes: 0 0 11 0 0 Base Vol: 26 259"' 48 S i g n a l = Stop / RI g h is =1 n cl u d e Street Name: University Ave. Roberts Rd. Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L. - T - R II---------- L - T - R - - - - - I ------------ --------------- Min. Green: 0 0' II--------------- 0 II--------------- 0 0 0 0 0 0 II ---------- 0 0 0 - - - - - I ------------ I--------------- Volume Module: >> Count II--------------- Date: II-------------- 10 Feb 2010 << Base Vol: 26 259 48 11 262 20 19 19 57 41 11 7 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 26 259 48 11 262 20 19 .19 57 41 11 7 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00, PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 26 259 48 11 262 20 19 19 57 41 11 7 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 26 259 48 11 262 20 19 19 57 41 11 7 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 26 259 48 II--------------- 11 262 20 II--------------- 19 19 57 II-------- 41 11 7 - - - - - I -------=---- I --------------- Saturation Flow Module: Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 0.08 0.78 0.14 0.04 0.89 0.07 0.20 0.20 0.60 0.69 0.19 0.12 Final Sat.: 60 597 111 28 673 51 II--------------- 128 128 385 II------- 409 110 70 - - - - - I ------------ I --------------- II--------------- Capacity Analysis Module: Vol /Sat: 0.43 0.43 0.43 0.39 0.39 0.39 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.10 0.10 0.10 Crit Moves: * * ** * * ** * * ** * * ** Delay /Veh: 10.8 10.8 10.8 10.4 10.4 10.4 8.8 8.8 8.8 9.0 9.0 9.0 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Del /Veh: 10.8 10.8 10.8 10.4 10.4 10.4 8.8 8.8 8.8 9.0 9.0 9.0 LOS by Move: B B B B B B A A A A A A ApproachDel: 10.8 10.4 8.8 9.0 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ApprAdjDel,: 10.8 10.4 8.8 9.0 LOS by Appr: B B A A A1lWayAvgQ: 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. Peak Hour Volume Signal Warrant Report [Urban) Intersection 42 University Ave. /Roberts Rd. ************************************************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** Base,.Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met Approach:, North Bound South Bound East. Bound West Bound Traftix 8At0715 ` Copyright (b) 2008'Dowling Associates, Inc. Llcensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA COMPARE Wed Mar {O.66:54:54:2010 .. Page 3 -6. { COMPARE Wed Mar 10 06:54:54 2010 Page 3.6 Movement: L — T — R L — T — R L — T — R L — T — R ------------ I--------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - - I Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Stop Sign, Stop Sign Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 Initial Vol: 26 259 48 11 262 20 19 19 57 41 11 7 ------ I--------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - - I Major Street Volume: 626 Minor Approach Volume: 95 Minor Approach Volume Threshold: 344 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SIGNAL WARRANT DISCLAIMER This peak hour signal warrant analysis should be considered solely as an "indicator" of the likelihood of an unsignalized intersection warranting a traffic signal in the future. Intersections that exceed this warrant are probably more likely to meet one or more of the other volume based signal warrant (such as the 4 -hour or 8 -hour warrants). The peak hour warrant analysis in this report is not intended to replace a rigorous and complete traffic signal warrant analysis by the,responsible jurisdiction. Consideration of the other signal warrants, which is beyond the scope of this software, may yield different results. Traffix 8,0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA COMPARE _ _ Wed Mar 10.06:54:54 2010 Page 3.7 2008'Los Gatos Slreet`Network Using the CMP methodology Level Of Service Computation, Report ' method (Base Volume Alternative) Exlstina - AM Peak _ Intersection #3: University Ave. /Andrews St. S ign a1 =S top /Rig his =1 nclu d e Base Vol: 97 195- 0 - Lanes: 0 1 0 0 0 Signal =Stop Sign, l =Stop _.. Base Vol: Lanes: Rlghls= Include .i Vol Cnl Dale: 2/10/2010 Cycle ? fine'(sec): - 100'' Rights= Include Lanes. Base Vol: - 0 Loss Tlme (sec): 0 _ 0 0 11 Critical V /C: 0.708 0 0 0 Avg Cdt Del.(sec /veh)..:.- 16.6 : - 0 _. 45 0 Avg Delay (saclveh): 1615 0 0 LOS: C I Lanes: 0 1 0 0 0 Base Vol: 67 310 0 S Ig n al =S top /Rlg hts =ln clud e Street Name: . University Ave. Andrews St. Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L -- T - R L - T - R L - T - R - --=-------- I--------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - - I Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ------------ I--------------- II--------------- II--------------- I'I---------- - - - - - I Volume Module: >> Count Date: 10 Feb 2010 << Base Vol: 57 310 0 0 195 97 61 0 45 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 57 310 0 0 195 97 61 0 45 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.40 1.40 1.40 1.72 1.72 1.72 1.25 1.25 1.25 1.35 1.35 1.35 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 80 434 0 0 335 167 76 0 56 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 80 434 0 0 335 167 76 0 56 0 0 0 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.0.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 80 434 0 0 335 167 76 0 56 0 0 0 ------------ I--------------- It--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - - I Saturation Flow Module: Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 0.16 0.84 0.00 0.00 0.67 0.33 0.58 0.00 0.42 0.00 0.00 0.00 Final Sat.: 113 613 0 0 503 2.50 318 0 235 0 0 0 ------------ I --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - - I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol /Sat: 0.71 0.71 xxxx xxxx 0.67 0.67 0.24 xxxx 0.24 xxxx xxxx xxxx Crit Moves: * * ** * * ** * * ** Delay /Veh: 18.4 18.4 0.0 0.0 16.2 16.2 10.5 0.0 10.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 Delay Adj:. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Del /Veh: 18.4 18.4 0.0 0.0 16.2 16.2 10..5 0.0 10.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOS by Move: C C * * C C B * B ApproachDel: 18.4 16.2 10.5 xxxxxx Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 xxxxx ApprAdjDel: 18.4 16.2 10.5 xxxxxx LOS by Appr: C C B AllWayAvgQ: 2.1 2.1 2.1 1.8 1.8 1.8 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. Peak Hour Volume Signal Warrant Report [Urban) Intersection V University Ave. /Andrews St. Base Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met --'---------- I' --------------- 11 --------------- II--------------- II--------------- I Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound, Trafflx 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA COMPARE Wed Mar 1006:54:54 2010 .Page 3 -8 Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I----------- - --- II -------------- - II--------------- II---------- - - - - - I Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Stop Sign Stop Sign Lanes: 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Vol: 57 310 0 0 195 97 61 0 45 0 0 0 ------------ I --------------- II II--------------- II---------- - - - - - I Major Street Volume: 659 Minor Approach Volume: 106 Minor Approach Volume Threshold: 331 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SIGNAL WARRANT DISCLAIMER This peak hour signal warrant analysis should be considered solely as an "indicator" of the likelihood of an unsignalized intersection warranting a traffic signal in the future. Intersections that exceed this warrant are probably more likely to meet one or more of the other volume based signal warrant (such as the 4 -hour or 8 -hour warrants). The peak hour warrant analysis in this report is not intended to replace a rigorous and complete traffic signal warrant analysis by the responsible jurisdiction. Consideration of the other signal warrants, which is beyond the scope of this software, may yield different results. Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA COMPARE ...__ - ...- Wed,Mar. - .O' :54:54.2010.. - -- Page 3.9 -- - - 2008:Los Gatos.Street'Nelwork - Using the CMP methodology -PMP- Intersection #3: University Ave. /Andrews St. Base Vol: 74 Lanes: 0 Signal =Slop Base Vol: Lanes: Rights= Include 108 "" 0 J 0 0 1I 0 98 0 Signal =Sto Rlghts=lnclude 288 0 1 0 0 0 -- -- - Signal =Stop - Vol Cnt Date: 2/10/2010 Rights= Include Cycle Time (sec): - 100 Loss Time (sec)4 0 . Critical V /C: 0.605 Avg Cdt Det.(secfveh): _; 13.2 Avg Delay,(seclveh): 13,2 LOS: B A � t t Lanes: 0 1 0 0 Base Vol: 57 227 - S Ignal= Slop /Rights= Include Lanes: Base Vol: 0- 0' 0 0 Street Name: - University Ave. Andrews St. Approach:. North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ 1--------------- II--------------- II--------------- IL- - - - - - I Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ------------ 1--------------- II--------------- II--------------- II-- --- - ---- - - - - - I Volume Module: >> Count Date: 10 Feb 2010 << Base Vol: 57 227 0 0 288 74 108 0 96 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 57 227 0 0 288 74 108 0 96 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.15 1.15 1.15 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 66 261 0 0 346 89 130 0 115 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 66 261 0 0 346 89 130 0 115 0 0 0 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00-1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 66 261 0 0 346 89 130 0 115 0 0 0 ------------ I--------------- II--------------- II---- - -------- II---------- - - - - - I Saturation Flow Module: Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 0.20 0,80 0.00 0.00 0.80 0.20 0.53 0.00 0.47 0.00 0.00 0.00 Final Sat.: 136 540 0 0 572 147 327 0 290 0 0 0 ------------ 1--=------------ II--------------- II--------------- II- --- - ----- - - - - - I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol /Sat: 0.48 0.48 xxxx xxxx 0,60 0.60 0.40 xxxx 0.40 xxxx xxxx xxxx Crit Moves: * * ** * * ** * * ** Delay /Veh: 12.6 12.6 0.0 0.0 14.6 14.6 11.6 0.0 11.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Del /Veh: 12.6 12.6 0.0 0.0 14.6 14.6 11.6 0.0 11.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOS by Move: B B * * B B B * B ApproachDel: 12.6 14.6 11.6 xxxxxx Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 xxxxx ApprAdjDel: 12.6 14.6 11.6 xxxxxx LOS by Appr: B B B AllWayAvgQ: 0.8 0.8 0.8 1.3 1.3 1.3 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. - Peak Hour Volume Signal Warrant Report [Urban) Intersection 43 University Ave. /Andrews St. Base Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met --------------------------- II--------------- 11--------------- II- - - - - -I Approach:_ North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Traffix 8.0:0715- Copyright (o) 2008 DdMIng Associates, Inc; Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA COMPARE Wed Mar 10 06:54:54 2010 Page 3 -10 Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I -------- = ------ 11--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - -I Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Stop Sign . Stop Sign Lanes: 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Vol: 57 227 0 0 288 74 108 0 96 0 0 0 -- ---------- I ---------- ----- II--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - - I Major Street Volume: 646 Minor Approach Volume: 204 Minor Approach Volume Threshold: 336 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SIGNAL WARRANT DISCLAIMER This peak hour signal warrant analysis should be considered solely as an "indicator" of the likelihood of an unsignalized intersection warranting a traffic signal in the future. Intersections that exceed this warrant are probably more likely to meet one or more of the other volume based signal warrant (such as the 4 -hour or 8 -hour warrants). The peak hour warrant analysis in this report is not intended to replace a rigorous and complete traffic signal warrant analysis by the responsible jurisdiction. Consideration of the other signal warrants, which is beyond the scope of this software, may yield different results. Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA COMPARE Wed .Mar 10 06,54 :54.2010 - Page 3.11. 2008 Los Gatos Street Network Using the CMP methodology Level Of Service Computation Report method (Base Volume Alternative) Existing - AM Peak Intersection #4: University Ave./Towne Terrace Level Of Service Module: 2Way95thQ: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.7 xxxx 0.2 Control Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 8.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 14.8 xxxx 10.4 LOS by Move: * * * A * * * * * B * B Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 8.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * A ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx 13.5 ApproachLOS: * * * B Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. Peak Hour Delay Signal Warrant Report ************************************************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** Intersection #4 University Ave. /Towne Terrace Base Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met ------------ I --------------- II --------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - - I Approach: North Bound. South Bound East'Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Traffix 8.0;0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA Signal= Unconlrol /Rights= Include Base Vol: 0 235 13 Lanes: 0 0 0 1 0 '4) .4 � �* F Slgnal =Stop Slgnal =Stop Base Vol: Lanes: Rights= Include Vol Cnt Date: 211012010 Rlghls= Include Lanes: Base Vol: Cycle Time (sec): 100 0 0 J t 40 j Loss Time (sec): 0 0 0 0 0 _y _ Cnllcal VIC: 0.203 _ 0 0 Avg Crit Del (sec /veh): 2.6 0 0 0 Avg Delay (seclveh): 2.6 1 93 LOS B I I Lanes: 0 0 0 1 0 Base Vol: 0 338 16 Signal =U n control /Rig hts =l ncl u de Street.Name: University Ave. Towne Terrace Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R II---------- L - T - R - - - - - I ------------ I--------------- Volume Module: >> Count II Date: --------------- II--------------- 10 Feb 2010 << Base Vol: 0 338 16 13 235 0 0 0 0 93 0 40 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 338 16 13 235 0 0 0 0 93 0 40 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00, PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 0 338 16 13 235 0 0 0 0 93 0 40 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FinalVolume: 0 338 16 13 235 0 II 0 0 0 --------------- II---------- 93 0 40 - - - - - I ------------ I --------------- Critical Gap Module: II-------------=- Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 4.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 6.4 xxxx 6.2 FollowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 2.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx II---------- 3.5 xxxx 3.3 - - - - - I ------------ I --------------- Capacity Module: II--------------- II --------------- Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 354 xxxx'xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 607 xxxx 346 Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1216 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 463 xxxx 702 Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1216 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 459 xxxx 702 Volume /Cap: xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.01 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.20 xxxx 0.06 Level Of Service Module: 2Way95thQ: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.7 xxxx 0.2 Control Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 8.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 14.8 xxxx 10.4 LOS by Move: * * * A * * * * * B * B Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 8.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * A ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx 13.5 ApproachLOS: * * * B Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. Peak Hour Delay Signal Warrant Report ************************************************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** Intersection #4 University Ave. /Towne Terrace Base Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met ------------ I --------------- II --------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - - I Approach: North Bound. South Bound East'Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Traffix 8.0;0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA COMPARE Wed Mar 10 06:54:54 2010 Page 3 -12 ---- ------- - I --- ------ 11--------------- 11-- ------- ------ II--- ---- --- - --- -I Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Lanes: 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 Initial Vol: G 338 16 13 235 0 0 0 0 93 0 40 ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx 13.5 ------------ I --------------- II --------------- II ---- ----------- II---------- - - - - - I Approach[westbound ][lanes= 2][control =Stop Sign] Signal Warrant Rule #1: [vehicle- hours =0.5] FAIL - Vehicle -hours less than 5 for two or more lane approach. Signal Warrant Rule #2: [approach volume =133] FAIL - Approach volume less than 150 for two or more lane approach. Signal Warrant Rule 43: [approach count= 3][total volume =735] SUCCEED - Total volume greater than or equal to 650 for intersection with less than four approaches. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SIGNAL WARRANT DISCLAIMER This peak hour signal warrant analysis should be considered solely as an "indicator" of the likelihood of an unsignalized intersection warranting a traffic signal in the future. Intersections that exceed this warrant are probably more likely to meet one or.more of the other volume based signal warrant (such as the 4 -hour or 8 -hour warrants). The peak hour warrant analysis in this report is not intended to replace a rigorous and complete traffic signal warrant analysis by the responsible jurisdiction. Consideration of the other signal warrants, which is beyond the scope of this software, may yield different results. Peak Hour Volume Signal Warrant Report [Urban] Intersection #4 University Ave. /Towne Terrace Base Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met ------------ I --------------- II II------------- -- II---------- - - - - - I Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I --------------- II ---------- ----- II----=---------- II---------- - - - - - I Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Lanes: 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 Initial Vol: 0 338 16 13 235 0 0 0 0 93 0 40 -------- I--------------- II--------------- II---- ----------- ---------- - - - - -I Major Street Volume: 602 Minor Approach Volume: 133 Minor Approach Volume Threshold: 452 --------------------------------------------------------------_------------------ SIGNAL WARRANT DISCLAIMER This peak hour signal warrant analysis should be considered solely as an "indicator" of the likelihood of an unsignalized intersection warranting a traffic signal in the future. Intersections that exceed this warrant are probably more likely to meet one or more of the other volume based signal warrant (such as the 4 -hour or 8 -hour warrants). The peak hour warrant analysis in this report is not intended to replace a rigorous and complete traffic signal warrant analysis by the responsible jurisdiction. Consideration of the other signal warrants, which is beyond the scope of this software, may yield different results. Traffx 8.0.0715 Copyright(c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA COMPARE wed Mar 10 Page 3-13 2008 Los Gatos SGeetrNetvvork Using the CMP 2000 HCM Unsignalizedology Level Of Service Computation Report 2000.HCM'UnsIgnajIzed (Base Volume Aliemative) Existing - PM Peak Intersection #4: University Ave./Towne Terrace Slgnal=Uncontrol/Rights=lnclude Base Vol: 0 320 69 Lanes: 0 0 0 I #h 1 0 Signal=Stop Slgnal=Stop Base Vol: Lanes: Rlghts=lnclude Vol Cnt Date: 2/10/2010 Rlghts=lnclude Lanes: Base Vol: Cycle Time (see): ' 100 0 0 - 1 31 Loss Time (see): 0 0 .4- 0 0 0 CrItIcal WC: 0.112 0 0 0 Avg Crit Del-(seo/veh):, 119 0 0 0 Avg Delay (seclveh): 1.9 1 43 LOS: B Lanes: 0 0 .0 1 0 Base Vol: 0 251 52 Slgnal=Uncontro[/Rlghts=lnclude Street Name: University Ave. Towne Terrace Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R --------------- --------------- L - T - R --------------- ------------ --------------- 11 Volume Module: >> Count Date: 10 Feb 2010 << Base Vol: 0 251 52 59 326 0 0 0 0 43 0 31 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1. 1 1 1 1 1 Initial Bse: 0 251 52 59 326 0 - 0 0 0 43 0 31 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 0 251 52 59 326 0 0 0 .' 0 43 0 31 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FinalVolume: 0 251 52 59 326 0 0 0 0 --------------- --------------- 43 0 31 --------------- ------------ I --------------- Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx XXXXX 4.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 6.4 xxxx 6.2 FollowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx XXXXX 2.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx -.: . -------------- 11 --------------- 3.5 xxxx 3.3 ----------- --------------- Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 30 xkX xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 721 xxxx 277 Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1265 xxk xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 397 xxxx 767 Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1269 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 383 xxxx 767 Volume/Cap: xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.05 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx --------------- --------------- 0 xxxx 0.04 --------------- ------------ I --------------- Level.of Service Module: 2Way95thQ: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.4 xxxx 0.1 Control Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 8.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 15.6 xxxx 9.9 LOS by Move: A C * A Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT LTR RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 8.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: A ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx 13.2 ApproachLOS: B Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. Peak Hour Delay Signal Warrant Report Intersection #4 University Ave./Towne Terrace Base Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met --------------- --------------- --------------- ------------ I --------------- 11 Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L T - R L T R L T R L T - R Traffix 8,0.0715 Copyrlght (d) 2008 Dowling Assoclai6s, Inc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA COMPARE Wed Mar 10 06:54:54 2010 _ Page 3 -14 Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Lanes: 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 Initial Vol: 0 251 52 59 326 0 0 0 0 43 0 31 ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx 13.2 ------------ I --------------- II --------------- II ------ --------- II ---------- - - - - - I Approach[ westbound ][lanes= 2][control =Stop Sign] Signal Warrant Rule #1: [vehicle- hours =0.3] FAIL - Vehicle -hours less than 5 for two or more lane approach. Signal Warrant Rule 42: [approach volume =74] FAIL - Approach volume less than 150 for two or more lane approach. Signal Warrant Rule #3: [approach count =3][total volume =762] SUCCEED - Total volume greater than or equal to 650 for intersection with less than four approaches. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SIGNAL WARRANT DISCLAIMER This peak hour signal warrant analysis should be considered solely as an "indicator" of the likelihood of an unsignalized intersection warranting a.traffic signal in the future. Intersections that exceed this warrant are probably more likely to meet one or more of the other volume based signal warrant (such as the 4 -hour or 8 -hour warrants). The peak hour warrant analysis in this report is not intended to replace a rigorous and complete traffic signal warrant analysis by the responsible jurisdiction. Consideration of the other signal warrants, which is beyond the scope of this software, may yield different results. Peak Hour Volume Signal Warrant Report [Urban] Intersection #4 University Ave. /Towne Terrace Base Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met ------------ I --------------- II II--------------- II---------- - - - - - I Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ II--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - - I Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Lanes: 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 Initial Vol: 0 251 52 59 326 0 0 0 0 43 0 31 ------------ I--------------- II------------- -- II--------------- II---------- - - - - - I Major Street Volume: 688 Minor Approach Volume: 74 Minor Approach Volume Threshold: 410 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SIGNAL WARRANT DISCLAIMER This peak hour signal warrant analysis should be considered solely as an "indicator" of the likelihood of an unsignalized intersection warranting a traffic signal in the future. Intersections that exceed this warrant are probably more likely to meet one or more of the other volume based signal warrant (such as the 4 -hour or 8 -hour warrants). The peak hour warrant analysis in this report is not intended to replace a rigorous and complete traffic signal warrant analysis by the responsible jurisdiction. Consideration of the other signal warrants, which is beyond the scope of this software, may yield different results. Traffix 8.0.0716 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA COMPARE . Wed Mar 10:06:54:54 2010 Page 3.15 2008 Los Gatos Street Network Using the CMP 2D00 HCM Unsignalizedology Level Of Service ComputatlonReport 2060 HCM Operations (Base Volume Alternative). Existing - AM Peak Intersection #5; University Ave. /Chester St. Sig n al =U ncon trol /Rig h 1s =1 ncl u de Base Vol: 0 305 15 Lanes: 0 0 0 1 0 Signal =Stop Base Vol: Lanes: Ri Include 0 0 / 0 0 0 0 0 0 Vol Cnt Date: 2110/2010 Cycle Time (sec): 100 Loss Time (sec): 0 Critical V /C: 0.034 Avg Crit Del (sec /veh): 0.7 Avg Delay (sec /veh):, 0.7 LOS: B Signal =Slop Rlghis= Include Lanes: Base Vol: 0 18 0 11 0 0 14 Lanes: 0 0 p .::. 1 . 1 0 Base Vol: 0 339 6 Signal =U n control /Rights =l n clu de Street Name: University Ave. Chester St. - Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ P--------------- II --------------- II --------------- II ---------- - - - - - I Volume Module: >> Count Dater 10 Feb 2010 << Base Vol: 0 339 6 15 305 0 0 0 0 14 0 18 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 .1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 339 6 15 305 0 0 0 0 14 0 18 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 0 339 6 15 305 0 0 0 0 14 0 18 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FinalVolume: 0 339 6 15 305 0 0 0 0 14 0 18 ------------ I--------------- II-- -------- ----- II------- - - - - -- II---------- - - - - -I Critical Gap Module:` Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 4.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 6.4 6.5 6.2 FollowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxxx `xxxx xxxxx` 3.5 4.0 3.3 ------------ I ------- ------- -II = -------------- 117 _ - - - - =- --- 11 - - - -- - - - - -- - -I Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 345 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx'` "xxxxx 677 677 342 Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1225 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 421 377 705' Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 122`5 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 417 373 705 Volume /Cap: xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.01 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.03 0.00 0.03 ------------ I --------------- II'----------=---- 1f-- ------------- lf--- - - - = -- - - - -I Level Of Service Module: 2Way95thQ: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Control Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 8.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: * * * A Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 542 xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 0.2 xxxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 8.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 12.1 xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * A * *' * * * * B ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx 12.1 ApproachLOS: * * * B .Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. Peak Hour Delay Signal Warrant Report Intersection 45 University Ave. /Chester St. Base Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met ------------ I--- ------------ II --------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - - I Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Mo ve m ent: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Traffix 8.0.0715 - Copydght(c) 2008 Dowling AssocWes, Inc. Licensed to TJKM,. PLEASANTON, CA COMPARE Wed Mar 10 06:54:54 2010 _ Page 3 -16 Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Lanes: 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 Initial Vol: 0 339 6 15 305 0 0 0 0 14 0 18 ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx 12.1 ------------ I--------------- II--------------- 11--------------- II---------- - - - - -I Approach[ westbound ][lanes= l][control =Stop Sign] Signal Warrant Rule #1: [vehicle- hours =0.1] FAIL - Vehicle -hours less than 4 for one lane approach. Signal Warrant Rule #2: [approach volume =321 FAIL - Approach volume less than 100 for one lane approach. Signal Warrant Rule 43: [approach count= 3][total volume =697] SUCCEED - Total volume greater than or equal to 650 for intersection with less than four approaches. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SIGNAL WARRANT DISCLAIMER This peak hour signal warrant analysis should be considered solely as an "indicator" of the likelihood of an unsignalized intersection warranting a traffic signal in the future. Intersections that exceed this warrant are probably more likely to meet one or more of the other volume based signal warrant (such as the 4 -hour or 8 -hour warrants). The peak hour warrant analysis in this report is not intended to replace a rigorous and complete traffic signal warrant analysis by the responsible jurisdiction. Consideration of the other signal warrants, which is beyond the scope of this software, may yield different results. Peak Hour Volume Signal Warrant Report [Urban] Intersection #5 University Ave. /Chester St. Base Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met ------------ I--------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - - I Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ ---------- ----- II--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - - I Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Lanes: 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 Initial Vol: 0 339 6 15 305 0 D 0 0 14 0 18 ------------ I--.------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - - I Major Street Volume: 665 Minor Approach Volume: 32 Minor Approach Volume Threshold: 328 ----------------- 7 -------------------------------------------------------------- SIGNAL WARRANT DISCLAIMER This peak hour signal warrant analysis should be considered solely as an "indicator" of the likelihood of an unsignalized intersection warranting a traffic signal in the future. Intersections that exceed this warrant are probably more likely to meet one or more of the other volume based signal warrant (such as the 4 -hour or 8 -hour warrants). The peak hour warrant analysis in this report is not intended to replace a rigorous and complete traffic signal warrant analysis by the responsible jurisdiction. Consideration of the other signal warrants, which is beyond the scope of this software, may yield different results. Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA ( COMPARE Wed'Mar 10 2010 Page 3-17 2008 Los Gatos Street Network .Using the OMP 2000 HCM Operallonsology Level Of Servicb hi6thod (Babe Volurne,Alterhaflve) Intersection #5: University Ave./Chester St. SlgnaI=LIncontroVRIghts=IncIude Base Vol: 0 347 21 Lanes: 0 0 0 1 0 Signal=Stop SIgnaI=Stop Bass Vol: Lanes: Rlghts=lnclude Vol Cnt Date: 2/10/2010 Rlghts=Include Lanes: Base Vol: Cycle TInne (sec): 100 0 0 _'+ . .. Loss TInne (sec): 0 0 0 0 0 Cdticetft: 0.017 11 0 0 Avg CrIt Del (a eolveh): 0.3 0 0 0 Avg Delay (se eh): 0.3 LOS: B Lanes: 0 0 0 0 Base Vol: 0 294 19 SIgnaI=LIn con troI1RIghts=IncIude Street Name: University Ave. Ch�este Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bou ' nd West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - : R L - T - R ------------ --------------- I! --------------- --------------- --------------- Volume Module: >> Date: 10 Feb 2010 << Base Vol: 0 294 19 21 347 0 0 0 0 3 0 1 Growth Adj 1.00 1.00 1 1 1.00 1.00 1.00 1'.00 J.00 1.00 1.00 Initial B se: 0 1 294 19 21 347 . 0 b 0 ... b ' �3 0 1 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 - 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1-.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 0 294 19 _. 21 347 0 0 0 0 3 0 1 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 "" 0 FinalVolume: 0 294 19 21 347 0 0 0 0 3` 0 1 ------------ ------------ --------------- Critical Module-' Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 4.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx� 6 " .4 6.5 6 FollowUpTim:xxxkk xxxx xxxxx 2.2 ' ixx ' xxxxx xxxxx xxx x xxxx.. 3:5 - 3 --------- - - - I -- - - -- - ­ ­ ------------ ------ 1 -- - Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: xxxx XX xxxxx - 1 ' 313 x x"-x- x - xxxxx" xxxx xxxx xxxxx'-'::' 693 693 304 � Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 12 5 9� xxxx' x x xxxx x 413" '370 741 Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1259 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 407 363 741 Volume/Cap: xxx I x -x - x . ix - ' xxxx 0'.02 xxxx xxxx xxxx . xxxx xxxx^ 0. 01 0.00 0.00 ------------ ---------------- -------- Level Of Service Module 2Way95thQ: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Control Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 7.9 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: A Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT LTR - RT LT - LTR RT LT LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 459.xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 7.9 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 12.9 xxxxx Shared LOS: A B ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx 12.9 ApproachLOS: B Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. Peak Hour Delay Signal Warrant Report Intersection #5 University Ave./Chester St. Base Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met ------------ I --------------- 11 ------------- 11 ------------- -_1 --------------- I Approach: North Bound South•Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L T R L T - R L T R Traffix 81U716 Copyright 2008' Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON CA COMPARE Wed Mar 10 06:54:54 2010 Page 3 -18 ------------ I --------------- II ------ --------- II --------------- 11 --------------- I Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop. Sign Lanes: 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 Initial Vol: 0 294 19 21 347 0 0 0 0 3 0 1 ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx 12.9 ------------ --------------- Approach[westbound][lanes= l][control =Stop Sign] Signal Warrant Rule 41: [vehicle- hours =0.0] FAIL - Vehicle -hours less than 4 for one lane approach. Signal Warrant Rule #2: [approach volume =41 FAIL - Approach volume less than 100 for one lane approach. Signal Warrant Rule #3: [approach count= 3][total volume =6851 SUCCEED - Total volume greater than or equal to 650 for intersection with less than four approaches. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SIGNAL WARRANT DISCLAIMER This peak hour signal warrant analysis should be considered solely as an "indicator" of the likelihood of an unsignalized intersection warranting a traffic signal in the future. Intersections that exceed this warrant are probably more likely to meet one or more of the other volume based signal warrant (such as the 4 -hour or 8 -hour warrants). The peak hour warrant analysis in this report is not intended to replace a rigorous and complete traffic signal warrant analysis by the responsible jurisdiction. Consideration of the other signal warrants, which is beyond the scope of this software, may yield different results. Peak Hour Volume Signal Warrant Report [Urban] Intersection #5 University Ave. /Chester St. Base Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met - ----- - - - - -- - - -- --------------- ----------- - - -- Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T R L - T - R ------------ I --------------- II--------------- II-------------- - II ---------- - - - - - I Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Lanes: 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 Initial Vol: 0 294 19 21 347 0 0 0 0 3 0 1 ------------ I --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II ---------- - - - - - I Major Street Volume: 681 Minor Approach Volume: 4 Minor Approach Volume Threshold: 322 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- SIGNAL WARRANT DISCLAIMER This peak hour signal warrant analysis should be considered solely as an "indicator" of the likelihood of an unsignalized intersection warranting a traffic signal in the future. Intersections that exceed this warrant are probably more likely to meet one or more of the other volume based signal warrant (such as the 4 -hour or 8 -hour warrants). The peak hour warrant analysis in this report is not intended to replace a rigorous and complete traffic signal warrant analysis by the responsible jurisdiction. Consideration of the other signal warrants, which is beyond the scope of this software, may yield different results. Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA COMPARE - Wed'Mar.1006:54:542010 • - Page3.19 2008 Los Gatos Street .Network Using the CMP methodology Level Of Service Computation Report method (Base Volume Altemative) rv101 - GkA Paak. Intersection #6: University Ave. /Los Gatos Saratoga Rd. S Ig n al =Perm IURigh 1s =l n clude - Base Vol: 49 130 140 Lanes: yJ 0 y 1� 0 0 1 Signal =Protect 7 f TTT Signal= Protect Base Vol: Lanes: Rights= Include Vol Cni Date: 2/1012010 Rights= Include lanes: Base Vof Cycle Time (sec): 120 31 "' 1 0 158 Loss Time (sec): 9 0 r 1 713 1 Crlllcal V /C: 0.720 1 1175"' 1 -s- 4h" Avg Cdt Del (seclveh)I 21.6 0 ... .. ,: . 41 0 Avg Delay (sec /veh): _ 28.7 - 1 236 LOS: 0 Lanes: 1 A 1` s .. z. tl 1 Base Vol: 57 152 177 S lg nal =Pe rm it/Rig hts =l nclu de Street Name: University Ave. Los Gatos Saratoga' Rd. Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - ------ T - - R - - - - I ------------ I--------------- Min. Green: 10 - 10 il--=-- 10 ------- 10 10 II--------------- 10 7 10 II--- 10 - 7 10 10 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 --_=----- 4.0 11-------------- 4.0 4.0 4.0 11 4.0 ' 4.0 --- - ----------- 4.0 I ----------- - 1 --------------- Volume Module: >> Count II------ Date: 10 Feb 2010 - Base Vol: 57 152 177 140 130 49 31 713 41 236 1175 158 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 57 152 177 140 130 49 31 713 41 236 1175. 158 User Adj: 1.40 1.40 1.40 1.72 1.72 1.72 1.25 1.25 1.25 1.35`1.35 1.35 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00' 1.00 PHF Volume: 80 213 248 241 224 84 39 891 51` 319 1.586 213 Reduct Vol: 0 0 - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ,.0... ..0 0 Reduced Vol: 80. 213 248 241 224 84 39 891 51 319 1586 213 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1:00 1.00 1:00' 1.00 1.00 1.00 - 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00' 1:00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 80 - 213 248 =II - 241 224 - -- ------ 84 ----= IL 39 891 ---------- - 51 - - - 319 ___ 1586 - 213 - - - -I ------------ I------------=- Saturation Flow Module: -11 Sat /Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 . 1900 Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1. -00 0:92 "0.92 1.00` 0.92 Lanes: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.71 0:29` 1.00 1:88 0.12' 1.00 1.75` 0.25 Final Sat.: 1750 1900 1750 1750 1348 508 11 1750 3577 --------------- 206 1t------ 1750 3316 =-------- . f ------------ --------------- Capacity Analysis'Module: II----------- Vol /Sat: 0.05 0.11 0.14 0.14 0,17 0.17 0.02 0.25 0.25 0.18 0.48 0.48 Crit Moves: * * ** * * ** * * ** Green Time: 26,8 26.8 26.8 26.8 26.8 26.8 7.0 48.7 48.7 35.6 77.2 77.2 Volume /Cap: 0.20 0.50 0.63 0.62 0.74 0.74 0.38 0.61 0.61 0,61 0.74 0.74 Delay /Veh: 38.2 41.7 45.6 45.0 50.5 50.5 56.8 29.0 29.0 38.5 15.9 15.9 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Del /Veh: 38.2 41.7 45.6 45.0 50.5 50.5 56.8 29.0 29.0 38.5 15.9 15.9 LOS by Move: D+ D D D D D E+ C C D+ B B HCM2k85thQ: 4 11 15 14 18 18 3 21 21 16 33 33 Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. Traftx 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Assoolates; Inc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA COMPARE Wed Mar 10 06:54:54 2010 Page 3.20 2008 Los Gatos Street Network Using the CMP methodology Level Of Service Computation Report method (Base Volume Alternative) _ Existing - PM Peak Intersection #6: University Ave, /Los Gatos Saratoga Rd, Sig na I =P erm IURig h 1s =I nc lud e Base Vol: 44 135 181 Lanes: 0 1 0 0 1 Slgnal= Protect T Slgnal= Protect Base Vol: Lanes: Rights= Include Vol Cnt Date: 2/10/2010 Rights = Include Lanes: Base Vol: Cycle Time .(sec): 120 67 1 0 144 0 Loss Time (sac): 9 1 1137 * ** 1 _ -- - _p Critical V /C: 0.888 1 802 1 Avg Cdt Del (sec /veh): 45.7 0 68 0 Avg Delay (sec /veh): 37.0 1 313 - LOS: D+ .4 4t t t Lanes: 1 0 1 0 1 Base Vol: 67 122 305 * ** Slgnal= PermlNRlghts =l nclude Street Name: University Ave. Los Gatos Saratoga Rd. Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - ------------ I ------------- -- T - R L - T - R li L - T - R L - T - R Min. Green: 10 10 10 10 10 10 11--------------- 7 10 II--------------- 10 7 10 I 10 Y +R: 4.0 ------------ --------------- 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 --------------- 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Volume Module: >> Count Date: 10 Feb 2010 << --------------- --------------- Base Vol: 67 122 305 181 135 44 67 1137 68 313 802 144 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 67 122 305 181 135 44 67 1137 68 313 802 144 User Adj: 1.25 1.25 1.25 1.34 1.34 1.34 1.25 1.25 1.25 1.15 1.15 1.15 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 84 153 381 243 181 59 84 1421 85 360 922 166 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 84 153 381 243 181 59 84 1421 85 360 922 166 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1:00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 84 ------------ I ----------- - --- 153 381 243 181 59 II --------- -----= 84 1421 ` 85 360 922 166 Saturation Flow Module: II--------------- II---------- - - - - - I Sat /Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.92 .1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 Lanes: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.74 0.26 1.00 1.88 0.12 1.00 1.67 0.33 Final Sat.: 1750 ------------ I --------------- 1900 1750 1750 1403 457 II--------------- 1750 3568 213 1750 3180 571 Capacity Analysis Module: II--------------- II---------- - - - - - I Vol /Sat: 0.05 0.08 0.22 0.14 0.13 0.13 0.05 0.40 0.40 0.21 0.29 0.29 Crit Moves: Green Time: 29.4 29.4 29.4 29.4 29.4 29.4 13.7 53.8 53.8 27.8 67.9 67.9 Volume /Cap: 0.20 0.33 0.89 0.57 0.53 0.53 0.42 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.51 0.51 Delay /Veh: 36.1 37.6 63.4 41.4 40.4 40.4 50.9 36.5 36.5 65.2 16.1 16.1 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel /Veh: 36.1 37.6 63.4 41.4 40.4 40.4 50.9 36.5 36.5 65.2 16.1 16.1 LOS by Move: D+ D+ E D D D D D+ D+ E B B HCM2k85thQ: 4 7 26 14 12 12 6 40 40 23 18 18 Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA TJKM Transportation Consultants COMPARE Fri Apr 30 09:23:04 2010 Pa 3 -1 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative) Ex +App - AM Peak Intersection #1: University Ave. /Blossom Hill Rd. Signal= Permlt/Rights =l nclude Initial Vol: 27 70 92 Lanes: 1 �0 1 0 1 - Signal= Protect T Signal= Protect Initial Vol: Lanes: Rights= Include Vol Cnt Date: 2/10/2010 Rights= Include Lanes: Initial Vol: Cycle Time (sec): 100 40'" 1 0 150 0 Loss Time (sec): 9 1 324 1 Critical V /C: 0.481 1 651'" 1 Avg Cdl Del (sec /veh); 16:4 0 22 0 @� Avg Delay (seclveh): 22.4 1 181 LOS: C+ Lanes: 1 0 1 0 1 Initial Vol: 86 107 150 - S ign al =P erm it/Rig his = include Street Name: University Ave. Blossom Hill Rd. Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L ------------ I --------------- - T - R II L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Min. Green: 10 10 10 10 10 10 II--------------- 7 10 II---------- 10 7 10 - - - - - I 10 Y +R: 4.0 ------ - - - - -- 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Volume Module: >> Count Date: 10 Feb 2010 << Base Vol: 80 97 133 86 64 25 37 296 21 157 597 190 Growth Adj: 1.07 1.07 1.07 1.07 1.07 1.07 1.07 1.07 1.07 1.07 1.07 1.07 Initial Bse: 86 104 142 92 68 27 40 317 22 168 639 150 Added Vol: 0 3 8 0 2 0 0 7 0 13 12 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 86 107 150 92 70 27 40 324 ' 22 181 651 150 User Adj: 1.40 1.40 1:40 1.72 1.72 1.72 1.25 1.25 1.25 1.35 1.35 1.35 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 120 150 210 158 121 46 49 405 28 244 879 202 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 120 150 210 158 121 46 49 405 28 244 879 202 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 120 ------------ I --------------- II ----- ----------II---------------II----------- 150 210 158 121 46 49 405 28 244 879 202 Saturation Flow Module: -I Sat /Lane: 1900 1900 1900 .1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 Lanes: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.86 0.14 1.00 1.60 0.40 Final Sat.: 1750 ------------ I --------------- 1900 1750 II ------------ --- 1750 1900 1750 1750 3534 245 1750 3040 700 Capacity Analysis Module: II--------------- II---------- - - - - - I Vol /Sat: 0.07 0.08 0.12 0.09 0.06 0.03 0.03 0.11 0.11 0.14 0.29 0.29 Crit Moves: * * ** * * ** * * ** Green Time: 24.7 24.7 24.7 24.7 24.7 24.7 7.0 29.9 29.9 36.4 59.3 59.3 Volume /Cap: 0.28 0.32 0.49 0.37 0.26 0.11 0.40 0.38 0.38 0.38 0.49 0.49 Uniform Del: 30.4 30.8 32.2 31.2 30.3 29.1 44.5 27.8 27.8 23.5 11.6 11.6 IncremntDel: 0.4 0.4 0.9 0.5 0.3 0.1 2.2 0.2 0.2 0.4 0.2 0.2 InitQueuDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Delay /Veh: 30.8 31.2 33.1 31.7 30.6 29.2 46.7 28.0 28.0 23.9 11.8 11.8 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Del /Veh: .30.8 31.2 33.1 31.7 30.6 29.2 46.7 28.0 28.0 23.9 11.8 11.8 LOS by Move: C C C- C C C D C C C B+ B+ HCM2k85thQ: 5 6 10 7 5 2 2 8 8 9 14 14 Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA COMPARE F(i''Apr 30:09:23 :04..2010 Page. 3.2 Level Of Service Computation Report ... ____. _ _ . - 2000 HCM Opwatlons (Future Volurne.Alternative) Ez +App - PM Peak - - - Interk6tion 91: University Ave./Blossom Hill Rd, Slgnal= PermiURighls =l nclude Initial Vol: 66 135 161 Lanes: 1 0 1 0 1 Slgnal= Protect Slgnal Protact Initial Vol: Lanes: Rlghls= Include Vol Cnl Date: 2/10/2010 Rights =Intrude Lanes: Initial Vol: Cycle Time (sec): 100 0 44 37 1 Loss Time (sec): 9 0 1 389 1 Critical VIC: 0.407 1 398 1 Avg Cdt Del (seclGeh): 27.0 0 27 0 Avg Delay (sec /Veh): 26.3 1 145 - LOS S : / C " Lanes: 1 0 1 0 1 Initial Vol: 54 76 192 - Sig nal =P erm IURig hts =1 ncl u d e Street Name: University Ave.: Blossom Hill Rd. Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R II ---------- L - T - - R - - - - - I ------------ Min. Green: I--------------- 10 10' II--------------- 10 10 1,0 II--- ------------ 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 Y +R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 II --------------- 4.0 4.0 4.0 II ---------- 4.0 4.0 4.0 - - - - - I ------------ Volume Module: I--------------- >> Count II--------------- Date: 10 Feb 2010 << Base Vol: 54 71 172 161 131 66 37 378 .27 126 392 44 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 54 71 172 161 131 66 37' 378 27 126 392 44 Added Vol: 0 4 20 0 4 0 0 11 0 19 6 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 54 75 192 16.1 135 66 37 389 27 145 398 44 User Adj: 1.25 1.25 1.25 1.34 1.34 1:.34 1.25 .1.25 1.25 1.15 1.15 1.15 PHF Adj:, 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 68 94 240 216 1.81 88 46 486 34 167 458 51 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 -•0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 68 94 240 216 181 88 46. 486 34 167 458' 51 PCE Adj:;; 1 -00 1.00 1.00 1:00 1..00 1.00 1.00.1.00 1.00 1.00 1:00. 1.00 MLF Adj:; - •: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 68 --------------- 94 240 II-----------=--- 216 181 88 II---- ----------- 46 486 34 LI 167 - 458 ------- 51 - - - - I_ - ----------- I Saturation Flow Module: Sat /Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 190.0.1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 Lanes: 1.00 1:00' 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.86 0.14 1.00 1.79 0.21 Final Sat.: 1750 1900 1750 1.750 1900 1750 II---- ----------- 1750 3534 245 II' ---- = ----- 1750 3393 375 - - - - - I ------------ I --------------- Capacity.Analysis II--------------- Module: Vol /Sat: 0:04 0.05 0.14 0.12 0.10' 0.05 0.0.3 0.14 0.14 0.10 0.13 0.13 Crit Moves: * * ** * * ** * * ** Green Time: 33..7 33,7 33.7 33.7 33:7 33.7' 19,6 33.8 33.8 23.4 37.7 37.7 Volume, /Cap: 0:11 0.15' 0.41 0.37._0..28 0.15 0.14 0.41 0.41 0:41 0.36 0.36 Uniform Del: 22.8 23.1 25.5 25.0 24.3 23.1 33.2 25.4 25.4 32.4 22.4 22.4 IncremntDel; 0.1 0.1 0.5 0.4 0.2 0.1 0`,2 0.2 0',2 0.7 0.2 0.2 InitQueuD.el: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Delay Adj: 1.00 1:00 1.00 1.00' 1:00 1.00 1.00` 1.00 1.00, 1,00 1.00 1,00 Delay /Veh: 22.9.23.2 25.9 25.4 24.5 23.2 33'.4 25.6 25.6 33.1 22.6 22.6 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00!..1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Del /Veh; 22. -9 23.2 25.9 25.4 24.5 23.2 33.4 25.6 25.6 33.1 22.6 22.6 LOS by Move: C+ C C C C C C- C C C- C+ C+ HCM2k85thQ: 2 3 10 9 6 -3 - 2 9 9 7 8 8 Note:. Queue r eported is the number, of cars per lane Traffix 8,0:0716 Copyright(c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Iris. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA f� COMPARE Fri Apr 30 09:23:04 2010 Page 3.3 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM 4 -Way Stop (Future Volume Alternative) Ex +A -AM Peak Intersection #2: University Ave. /Roberts Rd. Slg n ai =S top /Rig his =1 nciud e Initial Vol: 26 212 29 Lanes: 0 0 11 0 0 Signal =Stop Signal =Stop Initial Vol: Lanes: Rights= Include Vol Cnt Date: 2110/2010 Rights= Include Lanes: Initial Vol: Cycle Time (sec): 100 19 0 0 12 Loss Time (sec): 0 0 0 16 11 y� _ Critical V /C: 0.481 11 20 0 Avg Crit Del (sec /veh): 10.5 0 40- 0 Avg Delay (sec /veh): 10.5 0 41 LOS: B Lanes: 0 0 11 0 0 Initial Vol: 39- 285 49 S Ig n al= Stop /Rig hts =l nclu de Street Name: University Ave. Roberts Rd. Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R ------------ I --------------- II ------------- -- L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Min. Green: 0 0 0 ------------ --------------- II--------------- 0 0 0 II--------------- 0 0 II---------- 0 0 0 - - - - - I 0 Volume Module: >> Count Date: 10 Feb 2010 << --------------- II---------- - - - - -I Base Vol: 39 285 49 3 212 26 19 16 40 41 20 12 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 39 285 49 3 212 26 19 16 40 41 20 12 Added Vol: 0 0 0 26 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 39 285 49 29 212 26 19 16 40 41 20 12 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 39 285 ,49 29 212 26 19 16 40 41 20 12 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 39 285 49 29 212 26 19 16 40 41 20 12 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 .1.00 FinalVolume: 39 285 49 ------------ I--------------- 29 212 26 ------------ 19 16 40 41 20 12 Saturation Flow Module: II--------------- ---------- - - - - -I Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 0.10 0.77 0.13 0.11 0.79 0.10 0.25 0.21 0.54 0.57 0.27 0.16 Final Sat.: 81 592 102 ------------ I --------------- 81 593 73 --------- 158 133 333 335 163 98 Capacity Analysis Module: II------------ =-- II ---------- - - - - - I Vol /Sat: 0.48 0.48 0.48 0.36 0.36 0.36 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 Crit Moves: * * ** * * ** * * ** * * ** Delay /Veh: 11.5 11.5 11.5 10.1 10.1 10.1 8.8 8.8 8.8 9.1 9.1 9.1 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Del /Veh: 11.5 11.5 11.5 10.1 10.1 10.1 8.8 8.8 8.8 9.1 9.1 9.1 LOS by Move: B B B B 'B B A A A A A A Approach Del: 11.5 10.1 8.6 9.1 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ApprAdjDel: 11.5 10.1 8.8 9 LOS by Appr: B B A A Al1WayAvgQ: 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. Peak Hour Volume Signal Warrant Report [Urban] Intersection V University Ave. /Roberts Rd. ************************************************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** Traffix 8.0:0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA 3 COMPARE I Fri Apr 30..09:23:04 2010 - -- Page 3 -4 Futur.e.- Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met ------------ I --------------- II------------- II --------------- II ---------- - - - - - I Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound. West Bound Movement i L - T - R L T R L T - R L - T - R ------------ I ------------ - - -II- - -- ----- 11--------------- (1----- - - - - - I Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Stop Sign Stop Sign Lanese 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 Initial Vol: 39 285 49 29 212 26 19 16 40 41 20 12 ------------ I --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II----- ----- - - - - - I Major Street Volume: 640 Minor Approach Volume: 75 Minor Approach Volume Threshold: 338 ----------------------------------_---------------------------------------------- SIGNAL WARRANT DISCLAIMER This peak hour signal warrant analysis should be considered solely as an "indicator" of the likelihood of an.unsignalized intersection warranting.,,.,.... a traffic signal in the future. I ntersections that exceed this warrant are probably more likely to meet one or more of the other volume based signal warrant (such as the 4 -hour: or 8 -hour warrants). The peak hour warrant analysis in" "this report is not intended to replace $" a rigorous and complete traffic signal warrant analysis by the responsible jurisdiction. Consideration of the other signal warrants, which is beyond the scope of this software, may yield different TraFfix 9.0.0715 - Copydght(c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA COMPARE Fri Apr 30 09:23:04 2010 Page 3 -5 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM 4 -Way Stop (Future Volume Alternative) Ex +A - PM Peak Intersection #2: University Ave. /Roberts Rd. Signal =S lop /Rig hts =l nclu de Initial Vol: 20 262"' 57 Lanes: 0 0 11 0 0 Signal =Stop Signal =Stop Initial Vol: Lanes: Rlghls= Include Vol Cnt Date: 2110/2010 Rlghts= Include Lanes: Initial Vol: Cycle Time (sec): 100 19 0 _ 0 7 0 Loss Time (sec): 0 0 19 11 Critical V /C: 0.453 11 11 0 -�- Avg Crit Del (sec /veh): 10.8 g 57 0 Avg Delay (sec /veh): 10.8 0 41 LOS: B�yc� I I Lanes: 0 0 11 0 0 Initial Vol: 26 259` *' 48 Slgnal= Stop /Rights =l nclude Street Name: University Ave. Roberts Rd. Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I --------------- II ----------- ---- II--------------- II---------- - - - - - I Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ------ - - - - -- Volume Module: >> Count Date: 10 Feb 2010 << Base Vol: 26 259 48 11 262 2.0 19 19 57 41 11 7 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 26 259 48 11 262 20 19 19 57 41 11 7 Added Vol: 0 0 0 46 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 26 259 48 57 262 20 19 19 57 41 11 7 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 26 259 48 57 262 20 19 19 57 41 11 7 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 26 259 48 57 262 20 19 19 57 41 11 7 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 26 259 48 57 262 20 19 19 57 41 11 7 ------------ I II Il 11 I Saturation Flow Module: Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 0.08 0.78 0.14 0.17 0.77 0.06 0.20 0.20 0.60 0.69 0.19 0.12 Final Sat.: 59 588 109 126 578 44 125 125 375 398 107 68 ------ - - - - -- II---------- - - - - -I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol /Sat: 0.44 0.44 0.44 0.45 0.45 0.45. 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.10 0.10 0.10 Crit Moves; * * ** * * ** * * ** * * ** Delay /Veh: 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.3 11.3 11.3 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.2 9.2 9.2 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Del /Veh: 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.3 11.3 11.3 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.2 9.2 9.2 LOS by Move: B B B B B B A A A A A A ApproachDel: 11.0 11.3 9.0 9 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ApprAdjDel: 11.0 11.3 9.0 9.2 LOS by Appr: B B A A AllWayAvgQ: 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. Peak Hour Volume Signal Warrant Report [Urban] Intersection #2 University Ave. /Roberts Rd. ************************************************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** 1b Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA COMPARE .._ _ .. _ Fri Apr 30 09:23:042010. - - -- - Page 3 -6 Future Volume.Alternative: -Peak Hour-' Warrant NOT Met ` ------------ I--------------- II---------- II --------------- 11 ---------- - - - - - I Approach: North Bound South Bound _ East Bound, West Bound Movement : L - T - R L T - R L %- T - R L - T - R ------------ I------------- - II - -= ------------ - --=---------- II---------- - - - - -I CoritroT: Stop Sign Stop Sigh Stop Sign Stop. Sign _ j. Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 Initial Vol: 26 259 48 57 262 20 19 19 57 41 11 7 ------------ I--------------- II------------ II . -------- II ---------- - - - - - I Major Street Volume:. 672 Minor Approach Volume: 95 Minor Approach Volume Threshold: 325 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SIGNAL WARRANT DISCLAIMER k This peak hour signal warrant analysis should.be considered solely as an "indicator" of the likelihood.of_an . unsignalized intersection warranting_,:.: a traffic signal in the future. .1 ersections:that- exceed this warrant are probably more likely to meet one or more of the other volume based signal warrant ( such as the 4- houivror 8 -hour warrants) . Mx• ..<; , as The peak hour warrant analysis in'this report is not intended to replace a rigorous and complete traffic signal warrant analysis by the responsible jurisdiction. Consideration of the other signal warrants, which is beyond the scope of this software, may yield different tesults. TrafficUT715 Copftht(cp2008'DoQ1n9 Assoc(ates Inc: Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA COMPARE - Fri Apr 30 09:23:04 2010 Page 3 -7 cevei yr aerviee computation Keport -- 2000 HCM 4 -Way Stop (Future Volume Alternative) _ Ex +App -AM Peak Intersection #3: University Ave. /Andrews St. Street Name: University Ave. Andrews St. Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I----- ------=--- II--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - - I Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ------- --------------- --------------- --------------- --------------- Volume Module: >> Count Date: 10 Feb 2010 << Base Vol: 57 310 0 0 195 97 61 0 45 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 57 310 0 0 195 97 61 0 45 0 0 0 Added Vol: 0 2 0 0 3 13 8 0 4 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 57 312 0 0 198 110 69 0 49 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.40 1.40 1.40 1.72 1.72 1.72 1.25 1.25 1.25 1.35 1.35 1.35 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 80 437 0 0 341 189 86 0 61 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 80 437 0 0 341 189 86 0 61 0 0 0 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 80 437 0 0 341 189 86 0 61 0 0 0 ------------ --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - - I Saturation Flow Module: Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1 0.15 0.85 0.00 0.00 0.64 0.36 0.58 0.00 0.42 0.00 0.00 0.00 Final Sat.: 110 602 0 0 479 266 320 0 227 0 0 0 ------------ I --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - - I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol /Sat: 0.73 0.73 xxxx xxxx 0.71 0.71 0.27 xxxx 0.27 xxxx xxxx xxxx Crit Moves: * * ** * * ** * * ** Delay /Veh: 19.5 19.5 0.0 0.0 18.1 18.1 10.8 0.0 10.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Del /Veh: 19.5 19.5 0.0 0.0 18.1 18.1 10.8 0.0 10.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOS by Move: C C * * C C B * B ApproachDel: .19.5 18.1 10.8 xxxxxx Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 xxxxx ApprAdjDel: 19.5 18.1 10.8 xxxxxx LOS by Appr: C C B Al1WayAvgQ: 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.1 2.1 2.1 0.3 .0.3 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. Peak Hour Volume Signal Warrant Report [Urban] Intersection #3 University Ave. /Andrews St. Fenix a.u.uno Copyright (c).2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA Signal =S top /Rights =l nclu d e Initial Vol: 110 198*** 0 Lanes: 0 } 1 0 0 0 Signal =Stop Initial Vol: Lanes: Rights =Include Vol Cnt Date: 2/10/2010 Cycle Time (sec): 100 Signal =Stop Rights = Include Lanes: Initial Vol: 69 *** 0 0 'Loss Time (sec): 0 0 0 0 0 11 Critical V /C: 0325 0 0 0 Avg Crit Del (sec /veh): 17.8 .- 0 49 0 Avg Delay (sec /veh): 17.8 0 0 LOS: I C - q� T" t* Lanes: 0 1 0 0 0 Initial Vol: 67 312 * ** 0 S Ign al =Stop /Rig hts =1 n clude Street Name: University Ave. Andrews St. Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I----- ------=--- II--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - - I Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ------- --------------- --------------- --------------- --------------- Volume Module: >> Count Date: 10 Feb 2010 << Base Vol: 57 310 0 0 195 97 61 0 45 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 57 310 0 0 195 97 61 0 45 0 0 0 Added Vol: 0 2 0 0 3 13 8 0 4 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 57 312 0 0 198 110 69 0 49 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.40 1.40 1.40 1.72 1.72 1.72 1.25 1.25 1.25 1.35 1.35 1.35 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 80 437 0 0 341 189 86 0 61 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 80 437 0 0 341 189 86 0 61 0 0 0 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 80 437 0 0 341 189 86 0 61 0 0 0 ------------ --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - - I Saturation Flow Module: Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1 0.15 0.85 0.00 0.00 0.64 0.36 0.58 0.00 0.42 0.00 0.00 0.00 Final Sat.: 110 602 0 0 479 266 320 0 227 0 0 0 ------------ I --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - - I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol /Sat: 0.73 0.73 xxxx xxxx 0.71 0.71 0.27 xxxx 0.27 xxxx xxxx xxxx Crit Moves: * * ** * * ** * * ** Delay /Veh: 19.5 19.5 0.0 0.0 18.1 18.1 10.8 0.0 10.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Del /Veh: 19.5 19.5 0.0 0.0 18.1 18.1 10.8 0.0 10.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOS by Move: C C * * C C B * B ApproachDel: .19.5 18.1 10.8 xxxxxx Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 xxxxx ApprAdjDel: 19.5 18.1 10.8 xxxxxx LOS by Appr: C C B Al1WayAvgQ: 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.1 2.1 2.1 0.3 .0.3 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. Peak Hour Volume Signal Warrant Report [Urban] Intersection #3 University Ave. /Andrews St. Fenix a.u.uno Copyright (c).2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA COMPARE Fri. Apr 3009:23:04 2010 . - Page 3-6 E-uture Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met ------------ I--------------- II--------------- II ---- - ---------- II---------- - - - - - I Approach: North Bound South Bound ,East Bound West Bound Movement L - T - R L - T R L -- T - R L - T - R ------------ I-------- - - - - -- II =- ---=-=---- I1------ = -------- II--------------- I Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Stop Sign Stop Sign 'Lanes: 0 - 1 0 0 0 01 0 0 1 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Vol: 57 312 0 0 198 110 69 0 49 0 0 0 ------------ I--------------- II--------------- II------ II ---- - ----- - - - - - I Major Street Volume: 677 Minor Approach Volume: 118 _ Minor Approach Volume Threshold: 323. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SIGNAL WARRANT DISCLAIMER This peak hour signal warrant analysis should be considered solely as an "indicator" of the likelihood of an.unsignalized intersection warranting,' a traffic signal in the future. Intersections that,exeeed this warrant are probably more likely to meet one or more of the other volume based m 4 . signal warrant (such as the 4 -hour or 8 -hour warrants) " The peak hour warrant analysis in this report is not intended to replace s. a rigorous and complete traffic signal warrant analysis by the responsible jurisdiction. Consideration of the other signal r warrants ,_which is beyond . the scope of this software, may yield different results. Traffz 8[0:0715 Copyright '(c) 2008 Dowling Assdclates Inc: Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA l _. COMPARE Fri Apr 30 09:23:04 2010 Page 3.9 Street Name: University,Ave. Andrews St. Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I --------------- II --------- - - ---- II--------------- II---------- - - - - - I Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ------------ I --------------- II ---------- ----- II--------------- II---------- - - - - - I _Volume Module: >> Count Date: 10 Feb 2010 << Base Vol: 57 227 0 0 288 74 108 0 96 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 57 227 0 0 288 74 108 0 96 0 0 0 Added Vol: 0 4 0 0 4 19 20 0 10 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 57 231 0 0 292 93 128 0 106 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.15 1.15 1.15 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 66 266 0 0 350 112 154 0 127 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 66 266 0 0 350 112 154 0 127 0 0 0 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 66 266 0 0 350 112 154 0 127 0 0 0 ------------ I --------------- 11 II--------------- II------- - - - - -- Saturation Flow Module: Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 0.20 0.80 0.00 0.00 0.76 0.24 0.55 0.00 0.45 0.00 0.00 0.00 Final Sat.: 129 522 0 0 532 170 332 0 275 0 0 0 ------------ I --------------- II I--------------- II---------- - - - - - I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol /Sat: 0.51 0.51 xxxx xxxx 0.66 0.66 0.46 xxxx 0.46 xxxx xxxx xxxx Crit Moves: * * ** * * ** * * ** Delay /Veh:, 13.4 13.4 0.0 0.0 16.6 16.6 12.7 0.0 12.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Del /Veh: 13.4 13.4 0.0 0.0 16.6 16.6 12.7 0.0 12.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOS by Move: B B * * C C B * B ApproachDel: 13.4 16.6 12.7 xxxxxx Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 xxxxx ApprAdjDel: 13.4 16.6 12.7 xxxxxx LOS by Appr: B C B Al1WayAvgQ: 0.9 0.9 0.9 1.7 1.7 1.7 0.7 0..7 0.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. Peak Hour Volume Signal Warrant Report [Urban] Intersection #3 University Ave. /Andrews St. rarrix mu.ur io Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc, Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM 4 -Way Stop (Future Volume Alternative) Ex +A -PM Peak Intersection #3; University Ave, /Andrews St. S Ignal= Stop /Rights= Include Initial Vol: 93 292*'* 0 Lanes: 0 1 0 0 0 Signal =Stop Initial Vol: Lanes: Rights = Include a Vol Cnt Date: 2/10/2010 Cycle Time (sec): 100 Signal =Stop Rlghts= Include Lanes: Initial Vol: 128'** 0 ✓ 0 Loss Time (sec): 0 0 0 0 0 11 Critical V /C; . 0.656 1 0 0 0 �� 0 - Avg Crit Del (sec /veh): 14.6 0 106 0 Avg Delay {sec /veh); 14.6 0 0 LOS: B Lanes: 0 1 0 0 0 Initial Vol: 57 231 0 Signal =S lop /Rig hts =1 ncl ud e Street Name: University,Ave. Andrews St. Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I --------------- II --------- - - ---- II--------------- II---------- - - - - - I Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ------------ I --------------- II ---------- ----- II--------------- II---------- - - - - - I _Volume Module: >> Count Date: 10 Feb 2010 << Base Vol: 57 227 0 0 288 74 108 0 96 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 57 227 0 0 288 74 108 0 96 0 0 0 Added Vol: 0 4 0 0 4 19 20 0 10 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 57 231 0 0 292 93 128 0 106 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.15 1.15 1.15 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 66 266 0 0 350 112 154 0 127 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 66 266 0 0 350 112 154 0 127 0 0 0 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 66 266 0 0 350 112 154 0 127 0 0 0 ------------ I --------------- 11 II--------------- II------- - - - - -- Saturation Flow Module: Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 0.20 0.80 0.00 0.00 0.76 0.24 0.55 0.00 0.45 0.00 0.00 0.00 Final Sat.: 129 522 0 0 532 170 332 0 275 0 0 0 ------------ I --------------- II I--------------- II---------- - - - - - I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol /Sat: 0.51 0.51 xxxx xxxx 0.66 0.66 0.46 xxxx 0.46 xxxx xxxx xxxx Crit Moves: * * ** * * ** * * ** Delay /Veh:, 13.4 13.4 0.0 0.0 16.6 16.6 12.7 0.0 12.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Del /Veh: 13.4 13.4 0.0 0.0 16.6 16.6 12.7 0.0 12.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOS by Move: B B * * C C B * B ApproachDel: 13.4 16.6 12.7 xxxxxx Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 xxxxx ApprAdjDel: 13.4 16.6 12.7 xxxxxx LOS by Appr: B C B Al1WayAvgQ: 0.9 0.9 0.9 1.7 1.7 1.7 0.7 0..7 0.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. Peak Hour Volume Signal Warrant Report [Urban] Intersection #3 University Ave. /Andrews St. rarrix mu.ur io Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc, Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA COMPARE Fd Apr 30'0923;04201.0 - Page 3.10 Future Volume.- Alternative: Peak-Hour Warrant NOT-= Met ------------ I --------------- II --------------- II--------------- II-------- - - - - - I Approach: North Bound South . Bound East Bound West, Movement : L - T - R L - T? R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I-------------- -II - == - `-=---= 11- - - - - -- ----- •-- II---------- - - - - -I Control: St6p Sign Stop Sign Stop Sign Stop Sign Lanes 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 "" 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 0' 0' 0 Initial Vol: 57 231 0 0 292 93 128 0 106 0 0 0 ------------ I--------------- II------------- II -------------- - II---- _------ - - - - - I Major Street Volume: 673 Minor Approach Volume: 234 Minor Approach Volume Threshold: 325.. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SIGNAL WARRANT DISCLAIMER This peak hour signal warrant analysis should,be considered solely as an w "indicator" of the likelihood of ah,unsignalized intersection warranting ,,­ a traffic signal in the future. Iritersection& that•' exceed this warrant are probably more likely to meet one or more,of the., other_ volume based „ signal warrant (such as the 4 -hour or 8 -hour warrants):' = The peak hour warrant analysis in this report is not intended to replace a rigorous and complete traffic signal warrant' analysis by the responsible jurisdiction.- Consideration of the other signal warrarits,*,which,.is beyond the scope of this software, may yield differ ent results. t ' Traffix 6:0:0716 Oopydglii (c) 2008 Dowling Assoclates, Inc: Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA i COMPARE Fri Apr 30 09:23:04 2010 Page 3 -11 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignallzed (Future Volume Alternative) Ex +App - AM Peak Intersection #4: Universitv Ave./Towne Terrace Street Name: University Ave. Towne Terrace Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L.- T - R ------------ I --------------- II --------------- II--- ------------ II ---------- - - - - - I Volume Module: >> Count Date: 10 Feb 2010 << Base Vol: 0 338 16 13 235 0 0 0 0 93 0 40 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 338 16 13 235 0 0 0 0 93 0 40 Added Vol: 0 3 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 0 341 16 13 241 0 0 0 0 93 0 40 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 0 341 16 13 241 0 0 0 0 93 0 40 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FinalVolume: 0 341 16 13 241 0 0 0 0 93 0 40 ------------ I--------------- II--------------- II--------------- 11---------- - - - - -I Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 4.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 6.4 xxxx 6.2 FollowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 2.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 3.5 xxxx 3.3 ------------ I --------------- II--------------- II --------------- II---------- - - - - - I Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: xxxx kxxx xxxxx 357 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 616 xxxx 349 Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1213 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 457 xxxx 699 Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1213 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 454 xxxx 699 Volume /Cap: xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.01 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.21 xxxx 0.06 ------------ I-----=--------- II--------------- 11--------------- II---------- - - - - -1 Level Of Service Module: 2Way95thQ: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.8 xxxx 0.2 Control Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 8.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 15.0 xxxx 10.5 LOS by Move: * * * A * * * * * B * B Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 8.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * A ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx 13.6 ApproachLOS: * * * B Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. Peak Hour Delay Signal Warrant Report ************************************************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** * * * * * * * * * * * * ** Intersection #4 University Ave. /Towne Terrace ************************************************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met Traffix8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA Slgnal= Uncontral /Rights =l nclude Initial Vol: 0 241 13 Lanes: 0 0 0 1 0 -- Signal =Stop Initial Vol: Lanes: Rights= Include Vol Cnt Date: 2/10/2010 Slgnal =Stop Rights = Include Lanes: Initial Vol: 0 0 Cycle Time (sec): 100 1 40 0 Loss Time (sec): 0 0 0 0 - y� Critical V /C: 0.205 0 0 0 Avg Crit Del (sec /veh): 2.6 0. 0 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh): 2.6 1 93 LOS: B 1 I Lanes: 0 0 0 1 0 Initial Vol: '0 341 16 S Ig nal =Un control /Rlgh is =l ncl u de Street Name: University Ave. Towne Terrace Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L.- T - R ------------ I --------------- II --------------- II--- ------------ II ---------- - - - - - I Volume Module: >> Count Date: 10 Feb 2010 << Base Vol: 0 338 16 13 235 0 0 0 0 93 0 40 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 338 16 13 235 0 0 0 0 93 0 40 Added Vol: 0 3 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 0 341 16 13 241 0 0 0 0 93 0 40 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 0 341 16 13 241 0 0 0 0 93 0 40 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FinalVolume: 0 341 16 13 241 0 0 0 0 93 0 40 ------------ I--------------- II--------------- II--------------- 11---------- - - - - -I Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 4.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 6.4 xxxx 6.2 FollowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 2.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 3.5 xxxx 3.3 ------------ I --------------- II--------------- II --------------- II---------- - - - - - I Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: xxxx kxxx xxxxx 357 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 616 xxxx 349 Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1213 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 457 xxxx 699 Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1213 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 454 xxxx 699 Volume /Cap: xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.01 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.21 xxxx 0.06 ------------ I-----=--------- II--------------- 11--------------- II---------- - - - - -1 Level Of Service Module: 2Way95thQ: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.8 xxxx 0.2 Control Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 8.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 15.0 xxxx 10.5 LOS by Move: * * * A * * * * * B * B Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 8.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * A ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx 13.6 ApproachLOS: * * * B Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. Peak Hour Delay Signal Warrant Report ************************************************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** * * * * * * * * * * * * ** Intersection #4 University Ave. /Towne Terrace ************************************************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met Traffix8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA COMPARE Fri Apr 30 09 :23:04 2010 . P age 3.1 Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R -_ . _. - , ... Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled : Stop Sign Stop Sign Lanes 0 0 0 ''1 0 0" 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 Initial Vol: 0 - 341 16 13 241 0 - 0 -0 0 93 0 40 ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx 13.6 ------------ I --------------- II--------------- II-------- _------ II ---------- - - - - - I Approach[westbound] [lanes= 2][control =Stop Sign] Signal Warrant Rule 01: [vehicle- hours =0.5] FAIL - Vehicle -hours less than 5 for two or more lane approach. Signal Warrant Rule #2: [approach volume =1.33] FAIL - Approach volume less,than;�;.150 for two or more lane approach. Signal Warrant Rule #3: [approach - count= 3][total volume =744] SUCCEED - Total volume greater than or equal to 650 for.intersection with less than four approaches. -------------------------------------------------------------------------=------ SIGNAL WARRANT DISCLAIMER " "' This peak hour signal warrant analysis should be considered solely as an "indicator" of the likelihood of ato unsignalized intersection warranting a traffic signal in the future. Intersections that exceed this warrant are probably more likely to meet one or more of the-other volume based signal warrant (such as the 4 -hour or 8- hour'%warrants).'F -'g The peak hour warrant analysis in this report is not intended to replace a rigorous and complete traffic signal warrant analysis analysi by the responsible jurisdiction. Consideration of the other signai "warrants, which is beyond the scope of this software, may yield different results'. Peak Hour Volume Signal Warrant Report [Urban] Intersection 44 University Ave. /Towne Terrace Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met ---------- I-------- ------- 1[ ------------- = IL -- - ------------ II --------------- 1 Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - - I Control :.. Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign -Stop Sign Lanes: 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 Initial Vol: 0 341 16 13 241 0 0 0 0 93 0 40 -------- ---- I ------ =-------- 11------ =.-------- II------------ II------------ I Major Street Volumes 611 Minor Approach Volume: 133 Minor Approach Volume Threshold: 447 - -- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SIGNAL WARRANT DISCLAIMER.. This peak.hour signall'£warrant::analysis_ should be considered solely as an " indicator" - -of- the - likelihood -of an unsigna- iized- intersection - warranting a traffic signal in the future. Intersections that exceed this warrant are probably more likely to meet one or more.of the-other volume based signal warrant.(such as the.4 -hour or 8 -hour warrants)..' The peak hour warrant analysis in this report is not intended to replace a rigorous and complete traffic signal warrant analysis by the responsible jurisdiction. Consideration of the other signal warrants, which is beyond the scope.of this software, may yield different results. T�affix 8.0:0715 Copydght(c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA COMPARE Fri: Apr 30 09:23:04 2010 Page 3 -13 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignallzed (Future Volume Alternative) Ex +App - PM Peak Intersection #4: University Aveffowne Terrace Sig n a1 =U n con tro I /Rights =l n clude Initlal Vol: 0 340 59 Lanes: 0 0 00 1 0 Signal =Stop Y Signal =Slop Initial Vol: Lanes: Rights= Include Vol Cnt Date: 2/10/2010 Rlghts= Include Lanes: Initial Vol: Cycle Time (sec): 100 0 0 1 31 Loss Time (sec): 0 0 0 0 0 Critical V /C: 0.115 0 0 0 Avg Crit Del (sec /veh): 1.9 0 0 0 Avg Delay'(sec /veh): 1.9 1 43 LOS: B Lanes: 0 0 0 1 0 Initial Vol: 0 255 52 Signal =U n control /Rights =l nclu de Street Name: University Ave. Towne Terrace Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R ------------ L - T - R L.- T - R --------------- L - T - R I--------------- II Volume Module: » Count Date: il--------------- II 10 Feb 2010 ---------- - - - - - I Base Vol: 0 251 52 59 326 0 0 0 0 43 0 31 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ( Initial Bse: 0 251 52 59 326 0 0 0 0 43 0 31 Added Vol: 0 4 0 0 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 0 255 52 59 340 0 0 0 0 43 0 31 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 0 255 52 59 340 0 0 0 0 43 0 31 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FinalVolume: 0 255 52 ------------ 59 340 0 0 0 0 43 0 31 I--------------- II--------------- Critical Gap Module: II--------------- II---------- - - - - - I Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 4.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 6.4 xxxx 6.2 FollowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx ------------ --------------- 2.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 3.5 xxxx 3.3 I II--------------- Capacity Module: II --------------- II---------- - - - - - I Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 307 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 739 xxxx 281 Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1265 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 388 xxxx 763 Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1265 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 373 xxxx 763 Volume /Cap: xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.05 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.12 xxxx 0.04 ------------ I --------------- II--------------- Level Of Service Module: II --------------- II---------- - - - - - I 2Way95thQ: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.4 xxxx 0.1 Control Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 8.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 15.9 xxxx 9.9 LOS by Move: * * * A * * * * * C * ' A Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd ConDel :xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 8.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * A ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx 13.4 ApproachLOS: * * * B Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. Peak Hour. Delay Signal Warrant Report Intersection 44 University Ave. /Towne Terrace Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met TrafFlx 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA COMPARE Fri Apr 3009:23:04 2010 Page 3.14 - -.1 - -- - -- -- --[1,- - II -- - - -- --- --I1------ -- ------ -[ Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Lanes -. 0 0 . .0.... 1 0 0, 1 ._. 0. 0 0 , . 0 0 0 0 . _. 1 0 0. 0 1 Initial Vol: 0 255• 52 59 340 0 0 0 0 43 . - 0 31 ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx 13.4 ------------ I--------------- II--------------- II --------------- il ---------- - - - - - I Approach (westbound)[lanes= 2][control =Stop Sign] Signal Warrant Rule #1: [vehicle- hours =0.3] " FAIL - Vehicle -hours less than 5 for two or more lane approach. Signal Warrant Rule #2:_.[approach volume =74] FAIL - Approach volume , ' less than ::_150 for two or more lane approach. Signal Warrant Rule #3: [approach count= 3][total volume =7801 SUCCEED - Total volume greater y t - han or equal to 650 for intersection with less than four approaches. -------------------------------- --==-------------------------------------------- SIGNAL WARRANT DISCLAIMER a This peak hour signal warrant analysis should be considered solely as an "indicator" of the likelihood of ah ,unsignalized in ersection warranting a traffic signal in the future.. Intersections that this warrant are probably more likely to meet one or more of the other volume based signal warrant (such as the 4 -hour or 8 -hour warrants):` = The peak hour warrant analysis in this report is not intended to replace a rigorous and complete traffic signal.warrant analysis_ by the;.respdnsble jurisdiction. Consideration of the other signal warrants, which is beyond the scope of this software, may yield different results. Peak Hour Volume Signal Warrant Report [Urban] Intersection 44 University Ave. /Towne Terrace - Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met ------------ I--------------- II------= -------- II-= ------------- II-=--=--------- -1 Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I--------------- II--------------- 11----- ---------- II ------ - --- - - - - - I Control :,. Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign _Stop Sign Lanes: 0 0 0 1 0 0 .1 0. 0 0 0. 0 '0 0 0. 1 0- 0 0 1 Initial Vol: 0 255 52 59' 340 0 0 0 0 43 0 31 ------------ 1--------------- 11--------------- II-= ---------- - -- II -- - ------- - - - - - I Major Street Volume: 706:: Minor Approach Volume: 74_ Minor Approach Volume Threshold: 402- - - SIGNAL WARRANT DISCLAIMER: This peak hour signal: warrant_ analysis should be, considered "solely as .an_- " indicator {' of- the - likelihood of"an-- unsignalized intersection warranting a traffic signal in the future. Intersections that exceed this warrant: are probably more likely to meet one.or more of the other volume based signal warrant (such as the 4- hour. - or.8 -hour warrants). The peak hour warrant analysis in this report is not intended to replace a rigorous and complete traffic signal warrant analysis by the responsible jurisdiction. Consideration of the other signal warrants, which is beyond the scope of this software, may yield: - different results. Traffix MW16 - Copyright "(c) -2008 Dowling Associates,. -Inc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA r i t COMPARE Fri Apr 30 09:23:04 2010 Page 3 -15 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unslgnalized (Future Volume Alternative) Ex +App - AM Peak Intersection #5: University Ave. /Chester St. Street Name: University Ave. Chester St. Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I--------------- II--------------- II--------------- 11---------- - - - - -I Volume Module: >> Count Date: 10 Feb 2010 << Base Vol: 0 339 6 15 305 0 0 0 0 14 0 18 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 339 6 15 305 0 0 0 0 14 0 18 Added Vol: 0 3 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 0 342 6 15 311 0 0 0 0 14 0 18 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 0 342 6 15 311 0 0 0 0 14 0 18 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FinalVolume: 0 342 6 15 311 0 0 0 0 14 0 18 ------------ --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - - i Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 4.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 6.4 6.5 6.2 FollowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 2.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 3.5 4.0 3.3 ------------ I --------------- II--------------- II --------------- II------ - - - - -- - -I Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 348 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 686 686 345 Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1222 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 416 373 702 Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1222 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 412 368 702 Volume /Cap: xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.01 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.03 0.00 0.03 ------------ I--------------- II--------------= 11--------------- 11---------- - - - - -I Level Of Service Module: 2Way95thQ: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Control Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 8.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: * * * A Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 537 xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 0.2 xxxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 8.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 12.1 xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * A * * * * * * B ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx 12.1 ApproachLOS: * * * B Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. Peak Hour Delay Signal Warrant Report Intersection #5 University Ave. /Chester St. ************************************************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to TJKM,PLEASANTON, CA S Ignal =Un control /Rig hts =l nc l u de Initial Vol: 0 311 15 Lanes: 0 0 0 1 0 Slgnal =Stop Initial Vol: Lanes: Rlghts= Include Vol Cnt Date: 2/10/2010 Slgnal =Stop Rights= Include Lanes: Initial Vol: 0 0 Cycle Time (sec): 100 0 18 0 Loss Time (sec): 0 0 0 0 } Critical V /C; 0.034 11 0 0 Avg Crit Del (sec /veh): 0.7 0 0 0 Avg Delay (sec /veh): 0.7 0 14 LOS: B Lanes: 0 0 0 1 0 Initial Vol: 0 342 6 S Ig nal =Un con trol /Rights =l ncl u de Street Name: University Ave. Chester St. Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I--------------- II--------------- II--------------- 11---------- - - - - -I Volume Module: >> Count Date: 10 Feb 2010 << Base Vol: 0 339 6 15 305 0 0 0 0 14 0 18 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 339 6 15 305 0 0 0 0 14 0 18 Added Vol: 0 3 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 0 342 6 15 311 0 0 0 0 14 0 18 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 0 342 6 15 311 0 0 0 0 14 0 18 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FinalVolume: 0 342 6 15 311 0 0 0 0 14 0 18 ------------ --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - - i Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 4.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 6.4 6.5 6.2 FollowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 2.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 3.5 4.0 3.3 ------------ I --------------- II--------------- II --------------- II------ - - - - -- - -I Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 348 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 686 686 345 Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1222 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 416 373 702 Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1222 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 412 368 702 Volume /Cap: xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.01 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.03 0.00 0.03 ------------ I--------------- II--------------= 11--------------- 11---------- - - - - -I Level Of Service Module: 2Way95thQ: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Control Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 8.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: * * * A Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 537 xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 0.2 xxxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 8.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 12.1 xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * A * * * * * * B ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx 12.1 ApproachLOS: * * * B Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. Peak Hour Delay Signal Warrant Report Intersection #5 University Ave. /Chester St. ************************************************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to TJKM,PLEASANTON, CA COMPARE Fri Apr 30.09:23:04 2010 Page 3 -16 --- -- ----- I--------------- II------------ II -- ---- 11 ---- - ------- - - I Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ---------- - -- ------- I-----------=-=- il--------------- 11-- ----- - ------- II - - - -1 Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled' Stop Sign Stop Sign Lanes: 0 0 0 1 `0 0 1 0 0 0 0 b 0 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0, Initial Vol: 0 342 6 15 311 0 0 0 0 14 0 18 Approach Del: xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx 12.1 ------------ I --------------- II --------------- II --------------- II---------- - - - - - I Approach[ westbound ][lanes= l][control =Stop Sign] Signal Warrant Rule #1: [vehicle- hours =0.1] FAIL - Vehicle -hours less than 4 for one lane approach. Signal Warrant Rule 42: [approach volume =32] FAIL - Approach volume less than 100 for one lane approach. Signal Warrant Rule #3: [approach count= 3][total volume =706] SUCCEED - Total volume greater ­ t han or equal to 650 for intersection with less than four approaches. ------------------------------ - - - - -- ------------------------------------------- SIGNAL WARRANT DISCLAIMER This peak hour signal warrant analysis should be considered solely as an "indicator" of the likelihood of an unsignalized intersection warranting a traffic signal in the future. Intersections that exceed this warrant are probably more likely to meet one or more of the other volume based signal warrant (such as the -4 -hour or 8 -hour warrants) The peak hour warrant analysis in this report is not intended to replace a rigorous and complete traffic signal warrant by the responsible jurisdiction. Consideration of the other signal warrants, which is beyond the scope of this software, may yield different results. Peak Hour Volume Signal Warrant Report [Urban] Intersection University Ave. /Chester St. Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met ------------ I--------------- II--------------- II---- - ---------- II----------- - - - - I. Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L T - R ------------ I--------------- II------- II --------------- II ---------- - - - - - I Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Lanes: 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 Initial Vol: 0 342 6 15 311 01 0 0 0 14 0 18 ------------ I--------------- II -------- - ------ II --------------- II---------- - - - - - I Major Street Volume: 674 Minor Approach Volume: 32 Minor Approach Volume Threshold:•325 SIGNAL WARRANT DISCLAIMER This peak hour signal warrant analysis.should be considered solely as an "indicator" of the likelihood of an unsignalized intersection warranting a traffic signal in the future. Intersections that exceed this warrant are probably more likely to meet one or more of the other volume based signal warrant (such as the 4 -hour or 8 -hour warrants). The peak hour warrant analysis in this report is not intended to replace a rigorous and complete traffic signal warrant analysis by the responsible jurisdiction. Consideration of the other signal warrants, which is beyond the scope of this software, may yield different results. TrafFlx 8.0.0715 Copyright(c) 2008 Dowling Associates, . Inc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA i COMPARE Fri Apr 30 09:23:04 2010 Page 3 -17 =��E Lanes: 10 0 0 1 0 Initial Vol: 0 298 19 Signal =Un con tro I /Rights =l nclu de Street Name: University Ave. Chester St. Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I --------------- II --------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - - I Volume Module: >> Count Date: 10 Feb 2010 << Base Vol: 0 294 19 21 347 0 0 0 0 3 0 11 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 294 19 21 347 0 0 0 0 3 0 1 Added Vol: 0 4 0 0 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 0 298 19 21 361 0 0 0 0 3 0 1 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume; 0 298 19 21 361 0 0 0 0 3 0 1 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FinalVolume: 0 298 19 21 361 0 0 D 0 3 0 1 ------------ I---------------II--------------- II ----- ----------II--------- Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp :xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 4.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 6.4 6.5 6.2 FollowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 2.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 3.5 4.0 3.3 ------------ I --------------- II ------------- --II---------------II--------- Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 317 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 711 711 308 Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1255 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 403 361 737 Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1255 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 398 355 737 Volume /Cap: xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.02 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.01 0.00 0.00 ------------ 1--------------- II -------------- - II--------------- II---------- - - - - -I Level Of Service Module: 2Way95thQ: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Control Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 7.9 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move; * * * A Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 449 xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 7.9 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 13.1 xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * A * * * * * * B ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx 13.1 ApproachLOS: * * * B Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. Peak Hour Delay Signal Warrant Report Intersection #5 University Ave. /Chester St. Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc, Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignallzed (Future Volume Alternative) Ex +A p - PM Peak Intersection #5: University Ave: /Chester St. Signal= Unconlrol /Rights =l n clu de Initial Vol: 0 361 21 Lanes: 0 0 0 1 0 Signal =Stop Initial Vol: Lanes: Rights= Include Vol Cnt Date: 2/10/2010 Signal =Stop Rights= Include Lanes: Initial Vol: 0 0 Cycle Time (sec): 100 0 1 0 Loss Time (sec): 0 0 0 0 __y„ "' � Critical V /C: 0.017 11 0 0 Avg Crif Del (sec lush): 0.3 0 0 0 Avg Delay (sec /veh): 0.3 0 3 - =��E Lanes: 10 0 0 1 0 Initial Vol: 0 298 19 Signal =Un con tro I /Rights =l nclu de Street Name: University Ave. Chester St. Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I --------------- II --------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - - I Volume Module: >> Count Date: 10 Feb 2010 << Base Vol: 0 294 19 21 347 0 0 0 0 3 0 11 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 294 19 21 347 0 0 0 0 3 0 1 Added Vol: 0 4 0 0 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 0 298 19 21 361 0 0 0 0 3 0 1 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume; 0 298 19 21 361 0 0 0 0 3 0 1 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FinalVolume: 0 298 19 21 361 0 0 D 0 3 0 1 ------------ I---------------II--------------- II ----- ----------II--------- Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp :xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 4.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 6.4 6.5 6.2 FollowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 2.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 3.5 4.0 3.3 ------------ I --------------- II ------------- --II---------------II--------- Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 317 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 711 711 308 Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1255 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 403 361 737 Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1255 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 398 355 737 Volume /Cap: xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.02 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.01 0.00 0.00 ------------ 1--------------- II -------------- - II--------------- II---------- - - - - -I Level Of Service Module: 2Way95thQ: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Control Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 7.9 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move; * * * A Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 449 xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 7.9 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 13.1 xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * A * * * * * * B ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx 13.1 ApproachLOS: * * * B Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. Peak Hour Delay Signal Warrant Report Intersection #5 University Ave. /Chester St. Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc, Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA �y COMPARE - -.. _ ....- Fri 'Apr 3009:23A4.2010. - Page 3-18 I <--------------- II-- - - - - -- 61--------------- 11---------- -- - - -I Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T R L -. T _- R L - T - R. _.. Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled' "Stop "Sign Stop Sign Lanes: 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 „0 0 0 0' 0 0 0 0 1!x.0. 0 Initial Vol: - 0 298 19 21 361 _ 0 0" "" " 0 0 3 0 1 ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx 13.1 ------------ I --------------- II --------------- II--------------- II--- - - - - - I Approach[westbound][lanes= l][control =Stop Sign] Signal Warrant Rule #1: [vehicle- hours =0 0] FAIL - Vehicle -hours less than 4 for one lane approach. Signal Warrant Rule #2: [approach volume =4] ` FAIL - Approach volume less than 100 for one lane approach. Signal Warrant Rule #3: [approach count= 3][total volume =7.03] SUCCEED - Total volume greater than or equal to 650 for intersection yam with less than four approaches. --------------------------- - - -- -- --- - - - - -- - - - -- - ---- - - - - -- - - - - -- SIGNAL WARRANT DISCLAIMER This peak hour signal warrant analysis should be considered solely as an "indicator" of the likelihood of aft unsignalized intersection warranting t a traffic signal in the future. Intersections that' exceed this warrant are probably more likely to meet one or more of the other volume based signal warrant (such as the 4 -hour or B hour warrants) The peak hour warrant analysis in this report is ftot intended to replace a rigorous and complete traffic signal warrant analysis.by the responsible jurisdiction. Consideration of the other signal warrants, which is beyond the scope of this software;, =may yield different results. "- Peak Hour Volume Signal Warrant Report= [Urban]= Intersection #5 University Ave. /Chester St: - Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met - ------------ I------------ --- 11------=-------'- II --------------- IP------------ I Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound ° West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - - T - R L - T - R L - T R ------------ I------------- II --------------- II--------------- II---- - - - - - I Control:. Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Lanes: 0_0 0 1 0 0' 1 `- 0 0 0 0 0' 0 0' 0 0 0 1! 0 0 Initial Vol: 0 298 19 21: 361' 0 ' 0' 0 ` 0 3 0 1 ------------ I------------ 11 --------------- II----- II--------------- 1 Major Street Volume: 699- - Minor Approach Volume: 4 Minor Approach Volume Threshold: -315 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- - - - - -: SIGNAL WARRANT DISCLAIMER -s This peak. hour' signal '?warrant:analysis.::should be, considered sol-ely'. "as an -- "indicator " -of the likelihood of an unsignalized intersection warranting a traffic signal in the future. Intersections that exceed this warrant are probably more likely to.:meet one -or more.of the other volume based signal warrant (such as the 4° -hour or 8 -hour warrants):- The peak hour warrant analysis in this report is not intended to replace a rigorous and complete traffic signal warrant - analysis by the responsible jurisdiction. Consideration of the other signal warrants, which is beyond the scope of-this- software; - :may yield .different results. TPaffIx BA0715 Copydght`(c) 2008'Dowling Assoclates, Inc. Llcensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA r COMPARE Fri Apr 30 09:23:04 2010 Page 3 -19 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative) Ex +App - AM Peak Intersection #6: University Ave. /Los Gatos Saratoga Rd. S Ig n al= Permit/Rlg hts =l n clude Initial Vol: 49 133*** 143 Lanes: -* 0 1 -4 0 0 1 � �* Slgnal= Protect Signal= Protect Initial Vol: Lanes: Rights= Include Vol Cnt Date: 2/10/2010 Rlghts= Include Lanes: Initial Vol: Cycle Time (sec): 120 - 31 *'* 1 0 158 Loss Time (sec): 9 0 1 721 1 Critical V /C: 0.727 1 1185 * ** 1 Avg Grit Del (sec /veh): 21,9 0 I f 41 0 Avg Delay {sec /veh): 28,8 1 235 LOS: C Lanes: 1 0 1 0 1 Initial Vol: 60 155 177 Signal=Permit/Rights =l nclude Street Name: University Ave. Los Gatos Saratoga Rd. Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - ------------ I--------------- T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Min. Green: 10 10 II--------------- 10 II--------------- 10 10 10 7 10 II---------- 10 7 10 - - - - - I 10 Y +R: 4.0 ------------ I--------------- 4.0 4.0 11--------------- 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Volume Module: >> Count Date: II--------------- 10 Feb 2010 <c II---------- - - - - -I Base Vol: 57 152 177 140 130 49 31 713 41 236 1175 158 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 57 152 177 140 130 49 31 713 41 236 1175 158 Added Vol: 3 3 0 3 3 0 0 8 0 -1 10 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 60 155 177 143 133 49 31 721 41 235 1185 158 User Adj: 1.40 1.40 1.40 1.72 1.72 1.72 1.25 1.25 1.25 1.35 1.35 1.35 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 84 217 248 246 229 84 39 901 51 317 1600 213 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 84 217 248 246 229 84 39 901 51 317 1600 213 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 84 ------------ I --------------- 217 248 II--------------- 246 229 84 39 901 51 317 1600 213 Saturation Flow Module: II--------------- ll---------- - - - - - I Sat /Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 Lanes: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.71 0.29 1.00 1.88 0.12 1.00 1.75 0.25 Final Sat.: 1750 ------ I--------------- 1900 1750 II--------------- 1750 1357 500 1750 3579 204 1750 3319 443 Capacity Analysis Module: II--------------- 11---------- - - - - -I Vol /Sat: 0.05 0.11 0.14 0.14 0.17 0.17 0.02 0.25 '0.25 0.18 0.48 0.48 Crit Moves: * * ** * * ** * * ** Green Time: 26.9 26.9 26.9 26.9 26.9 26.9 7.0 48.9 48.9 35.2 77.1 77.1 Volume /Cap: 0.21 0.51 0.63 0.63 0.75 0.75 0.38 0.62 0.62 0.62 0.75 0.75 Uniform Del: 37.9 40.7 42.0 42.0 43.4 43.4 54.4 28.2 28.2 36.6 14.8 .14.8 IncremntDel: 0.3 1.0 3.3 3.2 7.4 7.4 2.4 0.8 0.8 2.3 •1.4 1.4 InitQueuDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Delay /Veh: 38.2 41.7 45.3 45.1 50.8 50.8 56.8 28.9 28.9 38.9 16.2 16.2 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Del /Veh: 38.2 41.7 45.3 45.1 50.8 50.8 56.8 28.9 28.9 38.9 16.2 16.2 LOS by Move: D+ D D D D D E+ C C D+ . B B HCM2k85thQ: 4 11 15 15 19 19 3 21 21 16 34 34 Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. Traffix 6.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA COMPARE Frl Apr30 09:23:04 2010 Page.3 -20 Intersection #6; University Ave, /Los Gatos Saratoga Rd. Slgnal= PermlNRlg hts= Include - Initial Vol: 44 142 188 Lanes: 0 1 0 0 1 Slgnal= Prolecl IniOal Vol: Lanes: Rights= Include 67 1 -1* 0 1 ,lr,,,. 11413 h 1 89 0 Vol Cnt Date: 2/10/2010 Cycle Time (sec): 120 Loss Time (sec): 9 Critical V(C: 0.905 . Avg Cdt Del (seclv&: 47.5 Avg Delay (sec /`veh): 38.1 LOS: D+ Slgnal= Protect Rlghls= lncludd� Lanes: Initial Vol: 0 144 1 ! � 1 818 0 1 = 319 Y Lanes: 1 0 1 0 1 Initial Vol: 93 126 307 Slgnal= Permlt/RIg h is =l n clud e Street Name: University Ave. Lds Gatos Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I------------- --11 --------------- II-------- Min. Green: 10 10 10 10 10 10 7 10 10 Y +R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.'0 ------------1--------------=11----------''-----11- Volume Module: >> Count Date: 10 Feb 2010 << Base Vol: 67 122 305 18.1 135 44 67 1137 68 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 67 122 305 181 135 `44 67 1137 68 Added Vol: 26 4 2 7 7 0 0 8 21 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 Initial Fut: 93 126 307 188 142 44 67 1145 89 User Adj:`` 1.25.1.25 1.25 1.34 -1.34 1.34 1.25 1.25 1:25 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1:00 :1 :00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 116 158 384 252 190 59 84 1431- 111 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 -4. 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 116 158 384 252- 190 59 84. 1431 111 PCE Adj: 1:00.1.00 1:00 1 :00 1:04 1.00 -: 1.00 - 1'0.0: 1.00 MLF Adj: 1:0.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00.? 1..00. 1':00 1:0.0 FinalVolume: 116 -- 158 384 252 1 X59 `84 1431- 111 ------------ I--------------- 11 ---------- 11 --------------- Saturation Flow Module: Sat /Lane:. 1900 1900' 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 Lanes: 1.00, 1:00 1.00 1.00..0.75 0.25 1.00 1.84: 0.16 Final Sat.: 1750 1900 1750 1750'1422 441 1750-3504 272 ------------ 1-------- - = - - -- 11--------------- ll--------- - - - - -- Capacity Analysis Module: Vol /Sat: 0.07 0 -.08` 0:22 0.14 0.13 0.13 0.05 0.41 0.41 Crit Moves: * * ** * * ** Green Time: 29..1 29.1 29`.1 29.1-29.1 29.1 13.54 -54..1 54.1 Volume /Cap: 0.27. 0 .'34 0.91 0`:59 0.55 0.55 0.42' 0 Ol 0.91 Uniform. Del: 36..9 - 37.6 44'..1 40.Z 39.8 39.8 49.6- 30. -5': 36.5 IncremntDel: 0.4 0.4 22..5 2.3 1.5 1.5 1.5 7.3 7.3 InitQueupel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0..0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Delay Adji- 1.00 1.00 1 .-00, 1.00 1.00 1000 1.0.0 -1:00 1:00 Delay /Ve'h:.< 37.3 38.0' 66..6 42.5 41.3 41.3' 51•.1 37..9 37.9 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1. -0.0 -1.00 1:,00 1. -0.0: 1.00 1.0:0 Adj Del /V6h:. 37.3 38..0 66.6 42:.5x41.3 41.3:% 51.,1 37.9- 37.9 LOS by Move: D+ D+ E D D D YD- D+ "D+ HCM2k85thQ: 6 -8 27 14 13 1 '13 - 6. 1 4.2 42 Not e: Q reported is the number of :cars per, lane,. TFaffik 8:00715' Copyright (c) 2008 Dowllhg Assdclates.lnc, ; aratoga Rd. West Bound L - T - R I---------- - - - - -I 7 10 10 4.0 4.0 4.0 I---------- - - - - -1 . 313 802 144 1.00 1.00 1.00 313- 802 144. 6 16 0 0 0 0 319 818 144 1.15- =1:15 1.15 "- 1.00 1.00 1.00 367 941 16'6 - =- 0 , 0 0 367 . - 941 166 1:00: 1.00 1.00 1.00:::11.00 1.00 36T. 9`4`1 16 . II - - -- ---- - - = - -1 1900 '1900 1900 0.92 1.00 0.92 1.00 1.68 0.32 1.750 3190 562 II---------- - - - - -I 0.21 0.29 0.29 27`.8' 68.,4 68:4.. 0.91 0.52 0.52 44.8 15.7 15.7 23.3 0.2 0.2 0..0 0.0 0:0 - 1 -.:00 1.00 1.00 68.1 16.0 16.,0 1:00 1.00 1.00 68.1 16.0 16.0 E B B, 24 18 18 Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON. CA TJKM Transportation Consultants COMPARE F ri Apr 30 09:26:05 2010 Pa », Level Of Service Computation Report - 2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternallve) Ex+App+Pd - AM Peak ' � Initial Vol: |� '��� ' ���» v� ' - ' �-` 6 ' ' -1 v 1 v v , mifialool: Lanes: Rl Vol omDate: 2/1012010 Ri Lanes: Initial Vol: u�" n" (sec): 100 40-- � o 160 � u=n��� o o -^4� ` mm , u�=w� ~~ o�w 1 651- 1 Avg om Del m.°v"m: 16.7 o xo o Avg Delay (s"mvem: ,,s - 1 162 LOS: o° Lanes: 1 o 1 » 1 InItIalvm 87 oo 154r Street Name: University Ave. Blossom Hill Rd. Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - r - u L - T - n L - c - R L - T - u -----------|-------------||--------------||--------------||------------| Min. Green: 10 10 10 18 Io 10 7 lO ln 7 10 zo r+R: *.o 4.0 4.0 «.O *.o *.o 4.0 4.0 4.0 *.o -------------| 4.0 «.n ---------|---------------||--------------||---------- Volume Module: >> Count Date: lV Feb uolo << ' Base Vol; 80 e7 lss 86 oo zo 37 zeo oz 157 597 140 ` Growth adj: 1.07 1.07 1.07 1.07 1.07 1.07 1.07 1.07 1.07 1.07 1.07 1.07 Initial 000: oo zoo 142 92 so 27 40 317 xz 168 639' zno Added vol: . 16 12 o 5 0 o 7 n zA 12 o paaoezayvol: n o o o 0 o n o o o o n Initial Fot: 87 zxh lo* e2 73 27 40 324 uz lnz osz 150 naor auj: 1.40 1.40 1.40 1.72 1.72 1.72 1.25 1.25 1.25 1.35 1.35 1.35 eer adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PuF Volume: 121 168 216 158 126 46 «e 405 oo 246 879 ooz nauunt vol: o o n n n n o n o n o O mednrou Vol: zxl 168 216 zsn zxo 46 xs 405 uo z«s 879 202 noo Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLr adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Fioa1vozume: 1e1 16e 216 158 zzs |--------------| «a 49 405 |--------------| 28 |------------- 246 879 202 | ------------|---------------| Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: zpoo 1900 1900 zenn 1e00 1900 zyon 1900 1900 1e00 zynu 1900 Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 Lanes: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.86 0.1* 1.00 1.60 0.40 Final Sat.: 1750 Ipnu 1750 1750 1900 1750 1750 3534 u«o oao soon 700 -----------|---------------||--------------||------- Capacity auazvoia Module: Vol/Sat: 0.07 0.09 0.I2 0.09 0.07 o.o» 0.03 0.11 0.11 0.14 0.29 0.29 'nrit Moves: Green Time: 25.1 25.1 25.1 25.1 25.1 25.1 7.0 29.6 29.6 on.s 58.9 58.9 vozom6/o"p: 0.28 0.35 o.«* 0.36 0.26 0.10 o.«n 0.39 0.39 0.39 0.49 0.49 ouizoqx Del: 30.1 30'7 32.0 30.8 aV.n 28.8 *4.5 28.0 28.0 23.6 11.9 11.9 zuoromuto'el: n.s 0.4 0.9 0.5 0.3 0.1 2.2 0.2 0.2 o.« 0.2 0.2 zuit0ueaoel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Delay ad1: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1100 1.00 oelav/veb' sO.« 31.2 32.8 31.3 30.3 28.9 46.7 28.2 28.2 24.0 12.1 12.1 ' naor oelAuj: 1.00 1.0D 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adjooz/vru: 30.4 31.2 32.8 sz.s so.s 28.9 46.7 28.2 zo.z o«.n 12.1 12.1 LOS �v Move: o o o- n o o o n c c a a o " ooM�ostuU' o 7 zo 7 o 2 2 o 8 y 14 z« mota: Queue reported is the ounbaz of cars per lane. Traffix 8.0.0715 Copydght (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA COMPARE Fri Apr 30 09:26:05 2010 Page 3 -2 -- - Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative) Ex +App +Pd - PM Peak Intersection #1: University Ave. /Blossom Hill Rd. Street Name: University Ave. Blossom Hill Rd. Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I--------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - - I Min. Green: 10 10 10 10 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 Y +R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4..0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 ------------ I--------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - - I Volume Module: >> Count Date: 10 Feb 2010 << Base Vol: 54 71 172 161 131 66 37 378 27 126 392 44 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 54 71 172 161 131 66 37 378 27 126 392 44 Added Vol: 0 11 21 0 17 0 0 11 1 22 6 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 54 82 193 161 148 66 37 389 28 148 398 44 User Adj: 1.25 1.25 1.25 1.34 1.34 1.34 1.25 1.25 1.25 1.15 1.15 1.15 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 6B 103 241 216 198 88 46 486 35 170 458 51 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 68 103 241 216 198 88 46 486 35 170 458 51 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 68 103 241 216 198 88 46 486 35 170 458 51 ------------ I --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II----------- - - - - I. Saturation Flow Module: Sat /Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 Lanes: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.86 0.14 1.00 1.79 0.21 Final Sat.: 1750 1900 1750 1750 1900 1750 1750 3525 254 1750 3393 375 ------------ I --------------- II------- - - - - -- II--------------- II -----=---- - - - - - I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol /Sat: 0.04 0.05 0.14 0.12 0.10 0.05 0.03 0.14 0.14 0.10 0.13 0.13 Crit Moves: * * ** * * ** * * ** Green Time: 33.6 33.6 33.6 33.6 33.6 33.6 19.6 33.7 33.7 23.7 37.8 37.8 Volume /Cap: 0.11 0.16 0.41 0.37 0.31 0.15 0.13 0.41 0.41 0.41 0.36 0.36 Uniform Del: 22.9 23.3 25.5 25.1 24.6 23.2 33.2 25.5 25.5 32.2 22.4 22.4 IncremntDel: 0.1 0.1 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.7 0.2 0.2 InitQueuDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Delay /Veh: 23.0 23.4 26.0 25.5 24.9 23.3 33.4 25.7 25.7 32.9 22.5 22.5 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel /Veh: 23.0 23.4 26.0 25.5 24.9 23.3 33.4 25.7 25.7 32.9 22.5 22.5 LOS by Move: C+ C C C C C C- C C C- C+ C+ HCM2k85thQ: 2 3 10 9 7 3 2 9 9 7 8 8 Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. Traf6x 8.0.0715 - Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA Slgnal =Perm it /Rights =l n clude Initial Vol: 66 148 161 Lanes: 1 0 1 0 1 Slgnal= Protect Initial Vol: Lanes: Rights = Include Vol Cnt Date: 2/10/2010 Signal= Protect Rights= Include Lanes: Initial Vol: 37 1 Cycle Time (sec): 100 ' 0 44 0 Loss Time (sec): 9 1 389*** 1 Critical V /C; 0.410 1 398 1 Avg Crit Del (sec /veh); 27.1 0 28 0 Avg Delay (sec /veh); 25.3 1 148 *** LOS:_ C Lanes: 1 0 1 0 1 Initial Vol: 64 82 193 *** Sig na I= Permit/Rig hts =i n clud e Street Name: University Ave. Blossom Hill Rd. Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I--------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - - I Min. Green: 10 10 10 10 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 Y +R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4..0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 ------------ I--------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - - I Volume Module: >> Count Date: 10 Feb 2010 << Base Vol: 54 71 172 161 131 66 37 378 27 126 392 44 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 54 71 172 161 131 66 37 378 27 126 392 44 Added Vol: 0 11 21 0 17 0 0 11 1 22 6 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 54 82 193 161 148 66 37 389 28 148 398 44 User Adj: 1.25 1.25 1.25 1.34 1.34 1.34 1.25 1.25 1.25 1.15 1.15 1.15 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 6B 103 241 216 198 88 46 486 35 170 458 51 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 68 103 241 216 198 88 46 486 35 170 458 51 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 68 103 241 216 198 88 46 486 35 170 458 51 ------------ I --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II----------- - - - - I. Saturation Flow Module: Sat /Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 Lanes: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.86 0.14 1.00 1.79 0.21 Final Sat.: 1750 1900 1750 1750 1900 1750 1750 3525 254 1750 3393 375 ------------ I --------------- II------- - - - - -- II--------------- II -----=---- - - - - - I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol /Sat: 0.04 0.05 0.14 0.12 0.10 0.05 0.03 0.14 0.14 0.10 0.13 0.13 Crit Moves: * * ** * * ** * * ** Green Time: 33.6 33.6 33.6 33.6 33.6 33.6 19.6 33.7 33.7 23.7 37.8 37.8 Volume /Cap: 0.11 0.16 0.41 0.37 0.31 0.15 0.13 0.41 0.41 0.41 0.36 0.36 Uniform Del: 22.9 23.3 25.5 25.1 24.6 23.2 33.2 25.5 25.5 32.2 22.4 22.4 IncremntDel: 0.1 0.1 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.7 0.2 0.2 InitQueuDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Delay /Veh: 23.0 23.4 26.0 25.5 24.9 23.3 33.4 25.7 25.7 32.9 22.5 22.5 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel /Veh: 23.0 23.4 26.0 25.5 24.9 23.3 33.4 25.7 25.7 32.9 22.5 22.5 LOS by Move: C+ C C C C C C- C C C- C+ C+ HCM2k85thQ: 2 3 10 9 7 3 2 9 9 7 8 8 Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. Traf6x 8.0.0715 - Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA COMPARE Fri Apr 30 09:26:05.2010 Page 3.3 2000 HCM 4 -Way Slop (Future Volume Alternative) Ex +ADO +pd - AM Peak Intersection #2; University Ave. /Roberts Rd. Slg n al =S top /Rig hts =1 ncl ud e Initial Vol: 26 217 29 Lanes: 0 0 11 0 0 "" Slgnal =Stop Initial Vol: Lanes: Rights= Include "' Vol Cnt Date: - 2/10 12010 Signal =Stop Rlghts= Include Lanes: Initial Vol: - Cycle Time (sec): 100 0 12 19 0 ,.. Loss Time (sec): 0 p a n t , 0 16 11 Cdtical VIC: 0.505 11 20 0 Avg -0dt Del (sec /vel ): si 10.6 0 40 0 Avg Delay (sec /veh): 10.8 ' 0 41 LOS: B qya Lanes: 0 0 11 0 0 Initial Vol: 39 302 49 - SIgna1= Stop /Rlghis= Include . Street Name: University Ave. Roberts Rd. Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I--------------- 11=-------------- II------ II ---------- - - - - - I Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ------------ I--------------- II--------------- II--------------- II ---------- - - - - - I Volume Module: >> Count Date: 10 Feb 2010 << Base Vol: 39 285 49 3 212 26 19 16 40 41 20 12 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 39 285 49 3 212 26 19 16 40 41 20 12 Added Vol: 0 17 0 26 5 0 0 0 0 0- 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 39 302 49 29 217 26 19 16 40 41 20 12 User Adj: 1.00 1.00. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1:00 1.00 1.00 1: 00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 39 302 49 29 217 26 19 16 40 41 20 12 Reduct'Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 39 302 49 29 217 26 19 16 40 41 20 12 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1'.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVoluime: 39 302 4'9 29' 217 26 19 16 40 41 20 12 ------------ I --------------- 11------------ =-- II--------------- II---------- - - =_ -I Saturation Flow Module: Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 0.10 -0.77 0.13 0.11 0.80 0.09 0.25 0.21 0.54 0.57 0.27 0.16 Final Sat.: 77 598 97 79' 592 71 156 132 329 331 162 . 97 ------------ I --------------- II--------------- II------= -------- II---------- - - - - - I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol /Sat: 0.50 0.50 0.50 0 - .37 0.37 0.37 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 Crit Moves: * * ** * * ** * * ** * * ** Delay /Veh: 11.9 11.9 11.9 10.2 10.2 10.2 8.8 8.8 8.8 9.2 9.2 9.2 Delay Adj': 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Del /Veh: 11.9 11.9 11.9 10.2 10.2 10.2 8.8 8.8 8.8 9.2 9.2 9.2 LOS by Move:' B B B B B B A A A A A A ApproachDel: 11.9 10.2 8.8 9.2 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 ApprAdjDel: 11.9 10.2 8.8 9.2 LOS by Appr: B 'B A A AllWayAvgQ: 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. Peak Hour Volume Signal Warrant Report [Urban] Intersection #2 University Ave. /Roberts Rd'. Traffix 0:0.0715 - Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA F _ t . COMPARE Fri Apr 30 09:26:052010 Page 3.4 Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met ------ - - - - -- Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - - I Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Stop Sign Stop Sign Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 Initial Vol: 39 302 49 29 217 26 19 16 40 41 20 12 ------------ I --------------- ll II--------------- II---------- - - - - - I Major Street Volume: 662 Minor Approach Volume: 75 Minor Approach Volume Threshold: 329 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SIGNAL WARRANT DISCLAIMER This peak hour signal warrant analysis should be considered solely as an "indicator" of the likelihood of an unsignalized intersection warranting a traffic signal in the future. Intersections that exceed this warrant are probably more likely to meet one or more of the other volume based signal warrant (such as the 4 -hour or 8 -hour warrants). The peak hour warrant analysis in this report is not intended to replace a rigorous and complete traffic signal warrant analysis by the responsible jurisdiction. Consideration of the other signal warrants, which is beyond the scope of this software, may yield different results. Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2006 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA COMPARE Fri Apr 30 09 :26:06.201.0 - - Page 3.6 Level Of Service Computatlon Report 2000 HCM *Wey Stop (Future Volume Altemative) - Fx +Ann +Pri - PM Peak Intersection #2; University Ave. /Roberts Rd.. S Ignal =S top /Rlghls =I nclud e Initial Vol: 20 279"" 57 - Lanes: 0 " 0 11 0 0 Slgnal =Stop T Slgnal =Slop Initial Vol: Lanes: Rlghls= Include Vol Cnt Date: 2/10/2010 Rlghls= Include Lanes: Iniflal Vol: Cycle Time (sec): 100 19 0 A 7 j Loss Time A ;. 19°" 11 _ ty - � I� CriticalVIC: 0.477 0 Avg Cdt Del (sec /veh): .11.1 0 57 0 Avg Delay (sec /veh): 11.t 0 41 LOS: B Lanes: 0 0 11 0 0 Initial Vol: 26 268"` 48 S Ig nal =S top /Rights =l n elude Street Name: University Ave. Roberts Rd. Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R II ---------- L - T - R - - - - - I --=--------- I--------------- Min. Green: 0 0 II--------------- 0 0 0. II---- 0 Ip--- ------------ 0 0 0 II ---------- 0 0 0 - - - - - I ------------ I--------------- Volume Module: >> Count II--------------- Date: 10 Feb 2010 << Base Vol: 26 259 48 11 262 20 1.9 19 57 41 11 7 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 26 259 48 11 262 20 19 19 57 41 11 7 Added Vol: 0 9 0' 46 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 26 268 48 57 279 20 19 19 57 41 11 7 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 26 268 46 57 279 20 19 19 57 41 11 7 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 26 268 48 57 279 20 19 19 57 41 11 7 PCE,Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF.Adj: 1.00` 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 26 268 48 II--------------- 57 279 20 II--------------- 19 19 57 II-------- 41 11 7 - - - - - I ------------ I --------------- Saturation Flow Module: Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 0.08 0.78 0.14 0.16 0.78 0.06 0.20 0.20 0.60 0.69 0.19 0.12 Final Sat.: 57 589 105 II--------------- 119 584 42 II------- 123 123 369 II ---------- 392 105 67 - - - - - ------------ 1--------------- Capacity Analysis Module: Vol /Sat: 0.4.5 0.45 0.45 0.48 0.48 0.48 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.10 0.10 0.10 Crit Moves: * * ** * * ** * * ** * * ** Delay /Veh: 11.3 11.3 11.3 11.7 11.7 11.7 9.1 9.1 9.1 9.2 9.2 9.2 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Del /Veh: 11.3 11.3 11.3 11.7 11.7 11.7 9.1 9.1 9.1 9.2 9.2 9.2 LOS by Move: B B B B B B A A A A A A Approach Del: 11.3 11.7 9.1 9.2 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ApprAdjDel: 11.3 11.7 9.1 9.2 LOS by Appr: B B A A Al1WayAvgQ: 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. Peak Hour Volume Signal Warrant Report Intersection 42 University Ave. /Roberts Rd. V.ffix 8.0:0716- Copyright (c)'2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA f COMPARE Fri Apr 30 09:26:05 2010 Page 3 -6 Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met --- ---------- I --------------- II 11--------------- II----- - - - - -- - - -I Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R - - ---------- I --------------- II II----------- .---- II---------- - - - - - I Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Stop Sign Stop Sign Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 Initial Vol: 26 268 48 57 279 20 19 19 57 41 11 7 ------------ I --------------- II II--------------- II---------- - - - - - I Major Street Volume: 698 Minor Approach Volume: 95 Minor Approach Volume Threshold: 315 -------------------------------------------------- =----------------------------- SIGNAL WARRANT DISCLAIMER This peak hour signal warrant analysis should be considered solely as an "indicator" of the likelihood of an unsignalized intersection warranting a traffic signal in the future. Intersections that exceed this warrant are probably more likely to meet one or more of the other volume based signal warrant (such as the 4 -hour or 8 -hour warrants). The peak hour warrant analysis in this report is not intended to replace a rigorous and complete traffic signal warrant analysis by the responsible jurisdiction. Consideration of the other signal warrants, which is beyond the scope of this software, may yield different results. Traffix 8.0,0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc, .Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA COMPARE Fri Apr 3009:26:05 2010 - .. :Page 3.7 Loss Time (sec); 0 0 D 0 11 Critical V /C; 0.758 0 0 0 0 Avg Crit Del (sec /veh): 18.9 0 49 0 Avg Delay (sec /veh): 18.9 0 0 LOS: C Lanes: 0 1 0 0 0 Initial Vol: 57 328 - 0 Slgnal =S top /Rights= Include Street Name: University Ave. Andrews St. Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I--------------- II---------- II --------------- II ---------- - - - - - I Min. Green: 0 0 0 0- 0 0 0 0, 0 0 0 0 ------------ I--------------- II--------- II --------------- II ---------- - - - - - I Volume Module: >> Count Date: 10 Feb 2010 Base Vol: 57 310 0 0 195 97 61 0 45 .0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 57 310 0 0 195 97 61 0 45 0 0 0 Added Vol: 0 18 0 0 6 13 8 0 4 0 0, 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 57 328 0 0 201 110. 69 0 49 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.40 1.40 1.40 1.72 1.72 1.72 1.25 1.25 1.25 1.35 1.35 1.35 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 80 459 0 0 346 189 86 0 61 0 0 0 Reduct Vol 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 80 459 0 0 346 189 86 0 61 0 0 0 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 80 459 0 0 346 189 86 0 61 0 0 0 ------------ I --------------- II--------------- I,--------------- II ---------- - - - - - I Saturation Flow Module: Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 0.15 0.85 0.00 0.00 0.65 0.35 0.58 0.00 0.42 0.00 0.00 0.00 Final Sat.: 105 606 0 0 478 262 319 0 226 0 0 0 ------------ I --------------- II--------------- II-------- II ---------- - - - - -I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol /Sat: 0.76 0.76 xxxx xxxx 0.72 0.72 0.27 xxxx 0.27 xxxx xxxx xxxx Crit Moves: * * ** * * ** * * ** Delay /Veh: 21.3 21.3 0.0 0.0 18.7 18.7 10.9 0.0 10.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1100 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj,Del /Veh: 21.3 21.3 0.0 0.0 18.7 18.7 10.9 0.0 10.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOS by Move: C C * * C C B.* B ApproachDel: 21.3 18.7 10.9 xxxxxx Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 xxxxx ApprAdjDel: 21.3 18.7 10.9 xxxxxx LOS by Appr: C C B Al1WayAvgQ: 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.2 2.2 2.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. Peak Hour Volume Signal Warrant Report (Urban] ************************************************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** Intersection #3 University, Ave. /Andrews St. Traffix'8.0:0715. -- - Copyright (c)'2008- Dowling - Associates, Inc. . Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM 4 -Way Stop (Future Volume Alternative) Ex +App +Pd - AM Peak Intersection #3: University Ave, /Andrews St, Slgnal =S lop /Rig hts =l nclud e Initial Vol: 110 201 0 Lanes: 0 -1 J ' ' 00I r 0 0 � )- lop, Slgnal =Slop i T Slgnal =Stop Initial Vol: Lanes: Rights= Include Vol Cnt Dale: 2/10/2010 Rights= Include Lanes: Initial Vol; Cycle Time (sec): 100 D 0 Loss Time (sec); 0 0 D 0 11 Critical V /C; 0.758 0 0 0 0 Avg Crit Del (sec /veh): 18.9 0 49 0 Avg Delay (sec /veh): 18.9 0 0 LOS: C Lanes: 0 1 0 0 0 Initial Vol: 57 328 - 0 Slgnal =S top /Rights= Include Street Name: University Ave. Andrews St. Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I--------------- II---------- II --------------- II ---------- - - - - - I Min. Green: 0 0 0 0- 0 0 0 0, 0 0 0 0 ------------ I--------------- II--------- II --------------- II ---------- - - - - - I Volume Module: >> Count Date: 10 Feb 2010 Base Vol: 57 310 0 0 195 97 61 0 45 .0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 57 310 0 0 195 97 61 0 45 0 0 0 Added Vol: 0 18 0 0 6 13 8 0 4 0 0, 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 57 328 0 0 201 110. 69 0 49 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.40 1.40 1.40 1.72 1.72 1.72 1.25 1.25 1.25 1.35 1.35 1.35 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 80 459 0 0 346 189 86 0 61 0 0 0 Reduct Vol 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 80 459 0 0 346 189 86 0 61 0 0 0 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 80 459 0 0 346 189 86 0 61 0 0 0 ------------ I --------------- II--------------- I,--------------- II ---------- - - - - - I Saturation Flow Module: Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 0.15 0.85 0.00 0.00 0.65 0.35 0.58 0.00 0.42 0.00 0.00 0.00 Final Sat.: 105 606 0 0 478 262 319 0 226 0 0 0 ------------ I --------------- II--------------- II-------- II ---------- - - - - -I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol /Sat: 0.76 0.76 xxxx xxxx 0.72 0.72 0.27 xxxx 0.27 xxxx xxxx xxxx Crit Moves: * * ** * * ** * * ** Delay /Veh: 21.3 21.3 0.0 0.0 18.7 18.7 10.9 0.0 10.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1100 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj,Del /Veh: 21.3 21.3 0.0 0.0 18.7 18.7 10.9 0.0 10.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOS by Move: C C * * C C B.* B ApproachDel: 21.3 18.7 10.9 xxxxxx Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 xxxxx ApprAdjDel: 21.3 18.7 10.9 xxxxxx LOS by Appr: C C B Al1WayAvgQ: 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.2 2.2 2.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. Peak Hour Volume Signal Warrant Report (Urban] ************************************************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** Intersection #3 University, Ave. /Andrews St. Traffix'8.0:0715. -- - Copyright (c)'2008- Dowling - Associates, Inc. . Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA COMPARE Fri Apr 30 09:26:052010 Page 3 -8 Future Volume.Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met ------ - - - - -- - Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I --------------- II II--------------- II---------- - - - - - I Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Stop Sign Stop Sign Lanes: 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Vol: 57 328 0 0 201 110 69 0 49 0 0 0 ------------ I --------------- II II--------------- II---------- - - - - - I Major Street Volume: 696 Minor Approach Volume: 118 Minor Approach Volume Threshold: 316 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SIGNAL WARRANT DISCLAIMER This peak hour signal warrant analysis should be considered solely as an "indicator" of the likelihood of an unsignalized intersection warranting a traffic signal in the future. Intersections that exceed this warrant are probably more likely to meet one or more of the other volume based signal warrant (such as the 4 -hour or warrants). The peak hour warrant analysis in this report is not intended to replace a rigorous and complete traffic signal warrant analysis by the responsible jurisdiction. Consideration of the other signal warrants, which is beyond the scope of this software, may yield different results. ratnx U.U.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA COMPARE ..... _.. ._Fri Apr 30.09:26:06'.201.0 _. ._ _.. _._. :.. _... Page 3-9 Level Of Service Gomputa0on Report _ 2000 HCM 4 -Way Slop (Future Volume AllematiVe)' Ez +APP +Pi' - PM Peak Intersection #3: lJniversity Ave. /Andrews St. Slgnal =S lop /Rig hts =l nclud e Initial Vol: 93 305"' 0 Lanes: 0 1 0 0 0 Slgnal =Stop Slgnal =Stop - -- Initial Vol: Lanes: Rights= Include Vol Cnt Date: 2/1012M Rights Include Lanes: Initial Vol: Cycle Time (sec): 100 p 0 128""" 0 Loss Time (sec): 0 _ ,. 0 0 0 11 Critic at V : 0.683 0 0 0 - Avg Cdt Dal (sec /veh).; ...15;2 7 0 106 0 Avg Delay (sec /veh). 7 15,2 0 0 -. LOS:. °- .. C; Lanes: 0 1 0. 0 0 Initial Vol: 67 239 0 Slgnal =S top /Rlg his =1 n cl u d e Street Name: University Ave. Andrews St. Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L 7 T - R ------------ I--------------- II--------------- II- - - ------------ II ---------- - - - - - I Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ------------ I--------------- II--------------- II --------------- II ---------- - - - - - 1 Volume Module: >> Count Date: 10 Feb 2010 << Base Vol: 57 227_ 0 0 288 74 108 0 96 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 57 227 0 0 288 74 108 0 96 0 0 0 Added Vol:. 0 12 0 0 17 19 20 0 10 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 57 239 0 0 305 93 128 0 106 0. 0 0 User Adj: 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.15 1.15 1.15 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 66 275 0 0 366 112 154 0 127 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: . 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 66 275 0 0 366 112 154 0 127 0 0 0 PCE'Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 66 275 0 0 366 112 154 0 127 0 0 0 Saturation Flow Module: Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 0.19 0.81 0.00 0.00 0.77 0.23 0.55 0.00 0.45 0.00 0.00 0.00 Final Sat.: 125 524 0 0 536 163 329 0 272 0 0 0 ------------ I ---------- II--------------- II--------------- II------ - - - - - I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol /Sat: 0.52 0.52 xxxx xxxx 0.68 0.68 0.47 xxxx 0.47 xxxx xxxx xxxx Crit Moves: * * ** * * ** * * ** Delay /Veh: 13.8 13.8 0.0 0.0 17.6 17.6 12.9 0.0 12.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 Delay Adj.: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Del /Veh: 13.8 13.8 0.0 0.0 17.6 17.6 12.9 0.0 12.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOS by Move: B B * * C C B * B ApproachDel: 13.8 17.6 12.9 xxxxxx Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 xxxxx ApprAdjDel: 13.8 17.6 12.9 xxxxxx LOS by Appr: B C B Al1WayAvgQ: 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.9 1.9 1.9 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. Peak Hour Volume Signal Warrant Report [Urban] Intersection #3 University Ave. /Andrews St. Trdffix'8.0,0 1'15 - Copyrighf'(c) 2008'Dowli6g ASsoclates,'lne:'- Licensed to TJKM; PLEASANTON', CA COMPARE Frl Apr 30 09:26:05 2010 Page 3 -10 Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met ------------ I --------------- II II--------------- II---------- - - - - - I Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I --------------- II II--------------- II---------- - - - - - I Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Stop Sign Stop Sign Lanes: 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 Initial Vol: 57 239 D 0 305 93 128 0 106 0 0 0 ------------ I --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - - I Major Street Volume: 694 Minor Approach Volume: 234 Minor Approach Volume Threshold: 317 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SIGNAL WARRANT DISCLAIMER This peak hour signal warrant analysis should be considered solely as an "indicator" of the likelihood of an unsignalized intersection warranting a traffic signal in the future. Intersections that exceed this warrant are probably more likely to meet one or more of the other volume based signal warrant (such as the 4 -hour or 8 -hour warrants). The peak hour warrant analysis in this report is not intended to replace a rigorous and complete traffic signal warrant analysis by the responsible jurisdiction. Consideration of the other signal warrants, which is beyond the scope of this software, may yield different results. Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA COMPARE ,_ FrI.Apr.30 09:26:b5.2010._. _ .. _. Page 3.11 Levee ur ,ervice lUfllpul -putt 2000 HCM Unsigdallzed'(Future VolUme Alternative):' - Ex +Aaa +Pd - AM Peak Intersection #4; University Ave,/Towne Terrace S lgnal= Uncontrol1Righls= Include Initial Vol: 0 241 17 Lanes 0 0 0 1 0 Slgnal =Slop Slgnal =Stop_ ,. Initlal Vol: Lanes: Rlghta= Include Vol Cnt Dale: 211012010 Rlghls= Include Lanes: Inlliai Vol: Cycle Time (sec): 100 0 0 1 66 . Loss Time (sec): 0 0 ` 0 0 0 _ ty C ilical VIC: 0217 47.77- . 0 0 , 0 � � h �r- Avg Crlt Del, (sec /veh),;. 2.9 0-;' •}T;r 0 0 Avg Delay (sec /veh): 2.9 1 97 . D Lanes: 0 0 0 1 0 Initial Vol: 0 341 17 S Ig nal =U ncontrol /Rlgh is =l ncl u de Street Name: University Ave. Towne Terrace Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I --------------- II --------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - - I Volume Module: >> Count Date: 10 Feb 2010 << Base Vol: 0 338 16 13 235 0 0 0 0 93 0 40 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 338 16 13 235 0 0 0 0 93 0 40 Added Vol: 0 3 1 4 6 0 0 0 0 4 0 16 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 0 341 17 17 241 0 01 0 0 97 0 56 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1100 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 0 341 17 17 241 0 0 0 0 97 0 56 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FinalVolume: 0 341 17 17 241 0 0 0 0 97 0 56 ------------ I--------------- II--------------- II--------------- II ---------- - - - - - I Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 4.,1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 6.4 xxxx 6.2 FollowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 2.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 3.5 xxxx 3.3 ------------ I --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II-- -------- - - - - - I Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 358 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 625 xxxx 350 Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1212 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 452 xxxx 698 Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1212 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 447 xxxx 698 Volume /Cap: xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.01 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.22 xxxx 0.08 - ----------- I --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II------- - - - - - I Level Of Service Module: 2Way95thQ: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.8 xxxx 0.3 Control Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 8.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 15.3 xxxx 10.6 LOS by Move: * * * A * * * * * C * B Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 8.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * A ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx 13.6 ApproachLOS: * * * B Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. Peak Hour Delay Signal Warrant Report Intersection #4 University�Ave. /Towne.Terrace Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met, TFefFlx 8.0:0715 C6Dyriglif'(6) 20061:56wiing Assodletes, Inc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON; CA COMPARE Fri Apr 30 09:26:05 2010 Page 3 -12 Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ---------- -- I --------------- II li--------------- II---------- - - - - - I Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Lanes: 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 Initial Vol: 0 341 17 17 241 0 0 0 0 97 0 56 Approach Del: xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx . 13.6 ------------ I -------------- II II--------------- II---------- - - - - - I Approach[ westbound ][lanes= 2][control =Stop Sign] Signal Warrant Rule #1: [vehicle- hours =0.6] FAIL - Vehicle -hours less than 5 for two or more lane approach. Signal Warrant Rule #2: [approach volume =153] SUCCEED - Approach volume >= 150 for two or more lane approach. Signal Warrant Rule #3: [approach count= 3][total volume =769] SUCCEED - Total volume greater than or equal to 650 for intersection with less than four approaches. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SIGNAL WARRANT DISCLAIMER This peak hour signal warrant analysis should be considered solely as an "indicator" of the likelihood of an unsignalized intersection warranting a traffic signal in the future. Intersections that exceed this warrant are probably more likely to meet one or more -of the other volume based signal warrant (such as the 4 -hour or 8 -hour warrants). The peak hour warrant analysis in this report is not intended to replace a rigorous and complete traffic signal warrant analysis by the responsible jurisdiction. Consideration of the other signal warrants, which is beyond the scope of this software, may yield different results. Peak Hour Volume Signal Warrant Report [Urban] Intersection 44 University Ave. /Towne Terrace Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met ------------ I--------------- II ---------- ----- 11 ---- - - ---------- II ----------- ---- I Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I --------------- II II--------------- II---------- - - - - - I Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Lanes: 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 Initial Vol: 0 341 17 17 241 0 0 0 0 97 0 56 ------------ --------------- II II--------------- II---------- - - - - - I Major Street Volume: 616 Minor Approach Volume: 153 Minor Approach Volume Threshold: 445 ------------------------------------,-------------------------------------------- SIGNAL WARRANT DISCLAIMER This peak hour signal warrant analysis should be considered solely as an "indicator" of the likelihood of an unsignalized intersection warranting a traffic signal in the future. Intersections that exceed this warrant are probably more likely to meet one or more of the other volume based signal warrant (such'as the 4 -hour or 8 -hour warrants). The peak hour warrant analysis in this report is not intended to replace a rigorous and complete traffic signal warrant analysis by the responsible jurisdiction. Consideration of the other signal warrants, which is beyond the scope of this software, may yield different results. Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling. Associates, Inc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA r . COMPARE Fri Apr 30 09:26:06 2010 . Page 3 -13 Intersection #4: University Ave./Towne Terrace Sig nal= Uncontrol /Rlgh ls= Include Initial Vol: 0 340 72 Lanes:. 0 0 0 1 0 i Slgnal =Slop Slgnal =Stop Initial Vol: Lanes: Rlghts= Include Vol Cnt Date: 2/10/2010 Rlghts= Include Lanes: Initial Vol: Cycle Time (sec): 100 0 0 1 39 Loss Time (sec): 0 p 0 0 0 Critical V /C: 0.126 0 0 0 Avg Crlt Del (sec /veh): 21 0 0 0 Avg Delay {sec /veh): 2.1 1 45 g •: LOS: B Lanes: 0 0 0 1 0 Initial Vol: 0 266. 56 Slgnal =U n con trol /Rlghts =l nclu d e Street Name: University Ave.' e Towne Terrace Approach: North Bound' South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I --------------- II--------------- II-------- -- - -- -II ----------------- I Volume Module: >> Count Date: 10 Feb 2010 << Base Vol: 0 251 52 59 32.6 0 0 0 0 43 0 31 Growth Adj.: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 251 52 59 326 0 0 0 0 43 0 31 Added Vol 0 4 4 13 14 0 0 0 0 2 0 8 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 0 255 56 72 340 0 0 0 0 45 0 39 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 0 255 56 72 340 0 0 0 0 45 0 39 Reduct Vol: 0. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 T 0 0 FinalVolume: 0 255 56 72 340 0 0 -0 0 45 0 39 ------------ L--------------- II--------------- II-------- II ------ = --- - - - - - I Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 4.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 6.4 6.2 FollowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 2.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 3.5 xxxx 3.3 Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 311 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 767 xxxx 283 Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1261 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 373' xxxx 761 Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1261 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 356 xxxx 761 Volume /Cap: xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.06 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.13 xxxx 0.05 ------------ I--------------- 11------- - - - - -- II--------------- 11--=------- - - - - -1 Level Of Service Module: 2Way95thQ: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.4 xxxx 0:2 Control Del :xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 8.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 16.6 xxxx 10.0 LOS by Move: * * * A * * * * * C * A Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 8.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * A' ApproachDel:_ xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx 13.5 ApproachLOS: * * * B Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. Peak Hour Delay Signal Warrant Report Intersection #4 University Aue. /Towne Terrace Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met TrafFlX 8:0;0715 Copyright (c) 2008 n6ming Associates, Inc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA COMPARE .Fri Apr 30 09:26:05 20 10 Page 3 -14 Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II------=--- - - - - - I Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Lanes: 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 Initial Vol: 0 255 56 72 340 0 0 0 0 45 0 39 ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx 13.5 ------------ I --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - - I Approach[ westbound ][lanes= 2][control =Stop Sign] Signal Warrant Rule #1: [vehicle- hours =0.3] FAIL - Vehicle -hours less than 5 for two or more lane approach. Signal Warrant Rule #2: [approach volume =84] FAIL - Approach volume less than 150 for two or more lane approach. Signal Warrant Rule #3: [approach count= 3][total volume =807] SUCCEED - Total volume greater than or equal to 650 for intersection with less than four approaches. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SIGNAL WARRANT DISCLAIMER This peak hour signal warrant analysis should be considered solely as an "indicator" of the likelihood of an unsignalized intersection warranting a traffic signal in the future. Intersections that exceed this warrant are probably more likely to meet one or more of the other volume based signal warrant (such as the 4 -hour or 8 -hour warrants). The peak hour warrant analysis in this report.is not intended to replace a rigorous and complete traffic signal warrant analysis by the responsible jurisdiction. Consideration of the other signal warrants, which is beyond the scope of this software, may yield different results. Peak Hour Volume Signal Warrant Report [Urban] Intersection #4 University Ave. /Towne Terrace Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met ------------ I--------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - - I Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I--------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - - I Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Lanes: 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 Initial Vol: 0 255 56 72 340 0 0 0 0 45 0 39 ------------ I--------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - - I Major Street Volume: 723 Minor Approach Volume: 84 Minor Approach Volume Threshold: 394 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SIGNAL WARRANT DISCLAIMER This peak hour signal warrant analysis should -be considered solely as an "indicator" of the likelihood of an unsignalized intersection warranting a traffic signal in the future. Intersections that exceed this warrant are probably more likely to meet one or more of the other volume based signal warrant (such as the 4 -hour or 8 -hour warrants). The peak hour warrant analysis in this report is not intended to replace a rigorous and complete traffic signal warrant analysis by the responsible jurisdiction. Consideration of the other signal warrants, which is beyond the scope of this software, may yield different results. Traffix 8.0,0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA COMPARE FrI Apr 3009:26:05 2010 Page 3-15 2000 Intersection #5: University Ave./Chester St. SIgnsL=UncontroVRIghts=IncIuc1e Initial Vol: 0 315 15 Lanes: 0 0 0 1 0 Slgnal=Stop Signal=Stop InItlalVol: Lanes: Rights=lnclude Vol Cnt Date: 2/10/2010 Rights- Lanes: Initial Vol: J* cycle Time (sec): 100 0 18 Loss Time (sec): 0 0 -,** 0 0 0 Critical V/C: 0.034 1 0 0 Avg Cr It Del (sec/veh): 0.7 0 0 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh): 0.7 0 14 Los- B Lanes: 0 0 0 1 0 Initial Vol: 0 343 S I g nal=.Uncontrol/Rights=lnclude Street Name: University Ave. Chester St. Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I --------------- ---------- 11 --------------- 11 --------------- Volume Mo*d'ule: >> Count Date: 10 Feb 2010 << Base Vol: 0' 339 6 15 305 0 0 0 0 14 0 18 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1-00 1 1 1 Initial Bse: 0 339 6 15 305 0 0 0 0 14 0 18 Added Vol: 0 4 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 0 343 6 15 315 0 0 0 0 14 0 18 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.0.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 1 1 1 PHF Volume: 0 343 6 .15 315 0 0 0 0 14 0 18 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FinalVolume: 0 343 6 15 315 0 0 0 0 - 14 0 18 ------------ --------------- --------------- -----= --------- --------------- Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 4.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx XXXXX 6.4 6.5 6.2 FollowUpTim':Xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 2- . .27xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xx xx xxxxx T xxxxx .5. 4.0 3.3 ------------ I ---------------- H ---------- 'Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 349 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 691 691 346 Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1221 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 413 370 702 Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1221 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 410 366 702 Volume/Cap: xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.01 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.03 0.00 0.03 ------------ I --------------- -------------- 11 --------------- ---------------- Level Of Service Module: 2Way95thQ: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.0 XX'XX xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx* xxxx xxxx xxxxx- Control Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 8.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: A Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 535 xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 0.2 xxxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 8.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 12.2 xxxxx Shared LOS: A B' ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx 12.2 ApproachLOS: B Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. Peak Hour Delay Signal Warrant Report Intersection #5 University Ave./Chester St. Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met T�afFlx 8:0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA COMPARE Fri Apr 30 09:26:06 2010 Page 3 -16 ------------ I--------------- II ----------- ---- II --------------- II--------------- I Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I--------------- II ----------- ---- II--------------- II--------------- I Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Lanes: 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 l! 0 0 Initial Vol: 0 343 6 15 315 0 0 0 0 14 0 18 ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx 12.2 ------------ I --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II--------------- Approach[westbound] [lanes= l][control =Stop Sign] Signal Warrant Rule 41: [vehicle- hours =0.1] FAIL - Vehicle -hours less than 4 for one lane approach. Signal Warrant Rule 42: [approach volume =32] FAIL - Approach volume less than 100 for one lane approach. Signal Warrant Rule 43: [approach count= 3][total volume =711] SUCCEED - Total volume greater than or equal to 650 for intersection with less than four approaches. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SIGNAL WARRANT DISCLAIMER This peak hour signal warrant analysis should be considered solely as an "indicator" of the likelihood of an unsignalized intersection warranting a traffic signal in the future. Intersections that exceed this warrant are probably more likely to meet one or more of the other volume based signal warrant (such as the 4 -hour or 8 -hour warrants). The peak hour warrant analysis in this report is not intended to replace a rigorous and complete traffic signal warrant analysis by the responsible jurisdiction. Consideration of the other signal warrants, which is beyond the scope of this software, may yield different results. Peak Hour Volume Signal Warrant Report [Urban] Intersection 45 University Ave. /Chester St. ************************************************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met ------------ I II II II I Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I ----------- ----II---------------II------------- Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Lanes: 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 Initial Vol: 0 343 6 15 315 0 0 0 0 14 0 18 ------------ I --------------- II ----------- ---- II--------------- II---------- - - - - - I Major Street Volume: 679 Minor Approach Volume: 32 Minor Approach Volume Threshold: 323 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SIGNAL WARRANT DISCLAIMER This peak hour signal warrant analysis should be considered solely as an "indicator" of the likelihood of an unsignalized intersection warranting a traffic signal in the future. Intersections that exceed this warrant are probably more likely to meet one or more of the other volume based signal warrant (such as the 4 -hour or 8 -hour warrants). The peak hour warrant analysis in this report is not intended to replace a rigorous and complete traffic signal warrant analysis by the responsible jurisdiction. Consideration of the other signal warrants, which is beyond the scope of this software, may yield different results. Traffix 8.0.0716 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Assoclates, Inc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA COMPARE . Fri Apr 30 09:26:05 2010 Page 3 -17 Intersection #5: University Ave, /Chester St. Signal =Unco n lrol /Rights =ln clu d e Initial Vol: 0 363 21 Lanes: 0 y0� 0 1 0 Signal =Stop Y TTT TTT Signal =Stop - Initial Vol: Lanes: Rights= Include Vol Cnt Dale: 2/10/2010 Rights= Include Lanes Initial Vol: Cycle Time (sec): 100 Loss Time (sec) : 0 . , 0 0 0 Cdtical.V /C: 0,017 11 0 0 74w Avg Crit ,STr Del (seclveh): 0.3 0 - 0 0 - Avg Delay (seclveh): 0.3 ' 0 3 LOS Lanes: 0 D. ... -•�_ : - .: 0 Initial Vol:.,-. 0- , - 302 19 Signal= Uncontrol /Rights = Include Street Name: University Ave '.' Chester St Approach: North Bound South • 80u_n,d East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R II---=---------- L - T - R .11--=-=----- L - T. R - - - - -I ------------ I --------------- 11 Volume Module: >> Count Date: ------ --- - ------ 10 Feb 2010 << Base Vol: 0 294 19 21 347 0 0 0 0 3 0 1 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.Ob 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 294 19 21 347 0 0 0 b 3 0 1 Added Vol: 0 8 0 0 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pas3erByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 0 302 19 21` 363 0 0 0 0 3. 1 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 0 302 19 21 363 0 0 0 0 3 0. 1 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0., 0 FinalVolume: 0 302 19 II------ --------- 21 363 0 II 0 0 0 - - -- - - 3 0 ------------ I--------------- Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 4,.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 6 9 6 5 6.2 FollowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx - - -I -- - - -- II 2.2 xxxx xxxxx -- =_ - =11 xxxxx xxxx; xxxxx -------- - 3 5 4 0 --------- Capacity Module Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 321 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 717 717 312 Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1250' xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 400 - 358 733 Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1250 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 394 352 733 Volume /Cap: xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.02 xxxx xxxx fl ----------= xxxx xxxx xxxx - - - - 11 0.01 ---------= 0.00 0.00 - - - -I' ------------ I------=-------- II-------- Level Of Service Module: 2Way95thQ: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Control Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 7.9 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: * * * A Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 446 xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxxx Shrd CdnDe.l:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 7:9 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 13.1 xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * A * * * * * * B ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx 13.1 ApproachLOS: * * * B Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. Peak Hour Delay Signal Warrant Report Intersection #5 University Ave. /Chester St. �: * * * *i;-k iF i;k *•k *�: *k *k k k i; k�:** i:' k* �E.*** �;*****' k* is * * * *�: *:F *�:i; * *i; �: * *1c * *k* *fir k * * *ic * * * *i; F uture Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met Trdffix'0:0.0715 Copyright :(c)2006 .'Dowling Associates, Inc. Llcensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA t ' COMPARE Fri Apr 3009:26:05 2010 Page 3.18 ---- ---- - - -- - II--- --- --- - -- -- I Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------- I --------------- II ----------- ---- II--------------- II---------- - - - - - I Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Lanes: 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 1! 0 0 Initial Vol: 0 302 19 21 363 0- D 0 0 3 0 1 ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx 13.1 ------------ I --------------- II--------------- II ----- ------ ---- II---------- - - - - - I Approach[ westbound ][lanes= l][control =Stop Sign] Signal Warrant Rule #1: [vehicle- hours =0.0] FAIL - Vehicle -hours less than 4 for one lane approach. Signal Warrant Rule #2: [approach volume =41 FAIL - Approach volume less than 100 for one lane approach. Signal Warrant Rule 43: [approach count= 3][total volume =7091 SUCCEED - Total volume greater than or equal to 650 for intersection with less than four approaches. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SIGNAL WARRANT DISCLAIMER This peak hour signal warrant analysis should be considered solely as an "indicator" of the likelihood of an unsignalized intersection warranting a traffic signal in the future. Intersections that exceed this warrant are probably more likely to meet one or more of the other volume based signal warrant (such as the 4 -hour or 8 -hour warrants). The peak hour warrant analysis in this report is not intended to replace a rigorous and complete traffic signal warrant analysis by the responsible jurisdiction. Consideration of the other signal warrants, which is beyond the scope of this software, may yield different results. Peak Hour Volume Signal Warrant Report [Urban] Intersection 45 University Ave. /Chester St. Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met ------------ I ------------- --11---------------II-------------- Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I --------------- II ---------- ----- II--------------- II---------- - - - - - I Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Lanes: 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 Initial Vol: 0 302 19 21 363 0 0 0 0 3 0 1 -- -=-------- I --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - - I Major Street Volume: 705 Minor Approach Volume: 4 Minor Approach Volume Threshold: 313 -----------------------------------------------------------------=--------------- SIGNAL WARRANT DISCLAIMER This peak hour signal warrant analysis should be considered solely as an "indicator" of the likelihood of an unsignalized intersection warranting a traffic signal in the future. Intersections that exceed this warrant are probably more likely to meet one or more of the other volume based signal warrant (such as the 4 -hour or 8 -hour warrants). The peak hour warrant analysis in this report is not intended to replace a rigorous and complete traffic signal warrant analysis by the responsible jurisdiction. Consideration of the other signal warrants, which is beyond the scope of this software, may yield different results. Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA COMPARE Fri Apr 3009:26:06.20.10 Peg e 3-19 Intersection #6: University Ave,/Los Gatos Saratoga Rd. SIgnal=PermltJRlghts=lnclude InItIal Vol: 49 135 145 Lanes: 0 1 0 0 1 signal=Protect Signal=Protect InItIalVol: Lanes: Rlghts=include Vol Cnt Date: 2/1012010 RIgfi Lanes: Initial Vol: Cycle Time (sec): 120 0 159 31 Loss Time (sec): 9 0 1 . 721 l Cdflcal V/C: 0.730 nl s 1 1185*** 1 Avg Crit Del (seolveh): 22.1 0 41 0 Avg Delay eclveh) , 1 23 L 0 S•. d Lanes: 1 0 1 0 Initial Vol: 60 - 165 177 SlgnaI=PermIl1Rghts=Include. Street Name; University Ave. Los Gatos Rd. Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T R T ------- R L-It L - --- T - R ------------ Min. Green: --------------- 10 10 10 --------------- 10 10 10 7 10 io 77 7 7 -------- 10 71 10 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 --------------- 4.0 4.0 4.0 : 4.0 --------------- 4.0 41 --------------- 4.0 4.0 Volume Module: --------------- >> Count Date: 10 Feb 2010 << - Base Vol: 57 152 177 140 1 ' 30 49 31 713 41 236 1175 158 Growth Adj; 1.00 1.00 1.00 1. 1 1 1 1 1 1-00 i 1-00 Initial Bse: 57 152 177 140 130 49 31 713 41 236 1175 158 Added Vol: 3 3 0 5 5 0 0 8 0 -1. 10 1 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 60 155 177 145 135 49 31 721 41 235 liH 159 User Adj: 1.40 1.40 1.40 1.72 1.72 1.72 1.25 1.25 1.25 1.35 35 -, 1 , 35 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 i . 00` 00' - 1 PHF Volume: 84 217 248 249 232 84 39 901 51 317 215 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 84 - 217 248 249 232 84 39 901 347 215 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00: 1` .00` 1.00' ilob 1 .00 i.b f. i A 00 " 00." 1 :9- 0 MLF Adj: 1.00 1'.00 1.00 !'.- bb 1.00 1 .00 1- :00' 1 0`0 1 .00 l i7 1.00 1 . 00, FinalVolume: 84 ------ 240 249 ------------ 232 B4 '39 901 - - -------- 3 A 600:'' 215 -------- - - - -I- Saturation Flow - -- Module: - Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 - 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 Lanes: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.7 0.28 "1.00 1 6.12 .00 1.00 " 1.7 ' 5 ' 1 * 75 0.25 Final Sat.: 1750 1900 1780 1750 1363 4 95 1750,.3,57.9 ------------ 204 - ' 1'7�5 0 -------------- 3317 44 5 - Capacity Analysis --------------- Module: Vol/Sat: 0.05 0.11 0.14 0.14 0.17 0.17 0.02 0.25 0.25 0.18 0.48 0.48 Crit Moves: Green Time: 27.1 27.1 27.1 27.1 27.1 27.1 7.0 48.8 48.8 35.1 76.9 76.9 Volume/Cap: 0.21 0.50 0.63 0.63 0.75 0.75 0.38 0.62 0.62 0.62 0.75 0.75 Uniform Del: 37.7 40.6 41.8 41.9 43.3 43.3 54.4 28.3 28.3 36.7 15.0 15.0 IncremntDel: 0.3 1.0 3.1 3.2 7.5 7.5 2.4 0.8 0.8 2.3 1.4 1.4 InitQueuDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Delay/Veh: 38.0 41.5 45.0 45.1 50.8 50.8 56.8 29.1 29.1 39.0 16.4 16.4 User 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 38.0 41.5 45.0 45.1 50.8 50.8 56.8 29.1 29.1 39.0 16.4 16.4 LOS by Move: D+ D D D D D E+ C C D B B HCN12HS hQ: 4 11 15 15 19 19 3 21 21 16 34 34 Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. Traffix 8.0:07-15. Copyright (c) Mdtl DowAng Associates, Inc: Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA COMPARE - Fri Apr 30 09:26:05 2010 Page 3.20 i Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative) Ex +A +P ' - PM Peak Intersection #6: University Ave. /Los Gatos Saratoga Rd. Signal= Permit/Rights =l nclude Initial Vol: 44 943 189 Lanes: D 1 00 0 �* 1 Signal= Proteci Y Slgnal= Protect Initial Vol: Lanes: Rights= Include Vol Cnt Date: 2/1012010 Rights= Include Lanes: Initial Vol; Cycle Time (sec): 120 67 1 0 146 0 Loss Time (sec): 9 1 1145`*` 1 Critical V /Ct 0.905 1 818 1 Avg Crit Del (sec /veh): 47.5 0. 89 0 Avg Delay (sec /veh): 38.1 1 319**' LOS: D+ Lanes: 1 0 1 0 1 Initial Vol: 93 128 307'** Slgnal= Permit/Rlghts= Include Street Name: University Ave. Los Gatos Saratoga Rd. Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: --------------------------- L - T - R II ----------- ---- L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Min. Green: 10 10 10 10 10 10 11--------------- 7 10 II---------- 10 7 10 - - - - -1 10 Y +R: ------------ 4.0 1 --------------- 4.0 4'.0 II 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Volume Module: >> Count Date: 10 Feb 2010 << II--------------- II---------- - - - - -I Base Vol: 67 122 305 181 135 44 67 1137 68 313 802 144 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 67 122 305 181 135 44 67 1137 68 313 802 144 Added Vol: 26 6 2 8 8 0 0 8 21 6 16 2 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 93 128 307 189 143 44 67 1145 89 319 818 146 User Adj: 1.25 1.25 1.25 1.34 1.34 1.34 1.25 1.25 1.25 1.15 1.15 1.15 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 116 160 384 253 192 59 84 1431 111 367 941 168 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 116 160 384 253 192 59 84 1431 111 367 941 168 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: ------------ I --------------- 11- -- - --- --------II---------------I1------------- 116 160 384 253 192 59 84 1431 111 367 941 168 Saturation Flow Module: -I Sat /Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 Lanes: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.75 0.25 1.00 1.84 0.16 1.00 1.68 0.32 Final Sat.: ------------ 1750 I --------------- 1900 1750 II ------------ --- 1750 1424 438 1750 3504 272 1750 3183 568 Capacity Analysis Module: II--------------- II---------- - - - - - I Vol /Sat: 0.07 0.08 0.22 0.14 0.13 0.13 0.05 0.41 0.41 0.21 0.30 0.30 Crit Moves: * * ** * * ** * * ** Green Time: 29.1 29.1 29.1 29.1 29.1 29.1 13.5 54.1 54.1 27.8 68.4 68.4 Volume /Cap: 0.27 0.35 0.91 0.60 0.56 0.56 0.43 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.52 0.52 Uniform Del: 36.9 37.6 44.1 40.3 39.8 39.8 49.6 30.5 30.5 44.8 15.7 15.7 IncremntDel: 0.4 0.5 22.5 2.3 I.S. 1.5 1.5 7.3 7.3 23.3. 0.2 0.2 InitQueuDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Delay /Veh: 37.3 38.1 66.6 42.6 41.3 41.3 51.1 37.9 37.9 68.1 16.0 16.0 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Del /Veh: 37.3 38.1 66.6 42.6 41.3 41.3 51.1 37.9 37.9 68.1 16.0 16.0 LOS by Move: D+ D+ E D D D D- D+ D+ E B B HCM2k85thQ: 6 8 27 14 13 13 6 42 42 24 18 18 Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA Transportation Consultants 4 f s` t COMPARE Fri Apr 30 10:36:03 2010 Page 3 -1 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative) Ex +App +Pd +Pnd -AM Peak Intersection #1: University Ave. /Blossom Hill Rd. S lgnal= PermlURights= Include Initial Vol: 27 73 92 Lanes: 1 0 1 0 1 Slgnal= Protect Slgnal= Protect initial Vol: Lanes: Rights = Include Vol Cnt Date: 2/10/2010 Rlghts= Include Lanes: Initial Vol: 40 "' 1` Cycle Time (sec): 100 0 150 y Loss Time (sec): 9 346 1 Critical V /C: 0.496 1 673"" 1 Avg Crit Del (sec /veh): 16.7 0 22 0 Avg Delay (sec /veh): 22,6 1 191 LOS: C+ Lanes: 1 0 1 0 1 Initial Vol: 87 120 157 - S ignal =PermIURights =l nclude Street Name: University Ave. Blossom Hill Rd. Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I --------------- II II--------------- II---------- - - - - - I Min. Green: 10 10 10 10 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 Y +R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 ------------ I --------------- II II--------------- II---------- - - - - - I Volume Module: >> Count Date: 10 Feb 2010 << Base Vol: 80 97 133 86 64 25 37 296 21 157 597 140 Growth Adj: 1.07 1.07 1.07 1.07 1.07 1.07 1.07 1.07 1.07 1.07 1.07 1.07 Initial Bse: 86 104 142 92 68 27 40 317 22 168. 639 150 Added Vol: 1 16 15 0 5 0 0 29 0 23 34 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 87 120 157 92 73 27 40 346 22 191 673 150 User Adj: 1.40 1.40 1.40 1.72 1.72 1.72 1.25 1.25 1.25 1.35 1.35 1.35 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 121 168 220 158 126 46 49 432 28 258 908 202 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 121 168 220 158 .126 46 49 432 28 258 908 202 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 121 168 220 158 126 46 49 432 28 258 908 202 ------------ I --------------- II ------------ --- II--------------- II---------- - - - - - I Saturation Flow Module: Sat /Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 Lanes: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.87 0.13 1.00 1_61 0.39 Final Sat.: 1750 1900 1750 1750 1900 1750 1750 3550 231 1750 3060 681 ------------ I --------------- II II--------------- 11---------- - - - - -I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol /Sat: 0.07 0.09 0.13 0.09 0.07 0.03 0.03 0.12 0.12 0.15 0.30 0.30 Crit Moves: * * ** * * ** * * ** Green Time: 25.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 25. - 0 7.0 29.9 29.9 36.1 59.0 59.0 Volume /Cap: 0.28 0.35 0.50 0.36 0.27 0.11 0.40 0.41 0.41 0.41 0.50 0.50 Uniform Del: 30.2 30.8 32.2 30.9 30.1 28.9 44.5 28.0 28.0 23.9 12.0 12.0 IncremntDel: 0.3 0.5 0.9 0.5 0.3 0.1 2.2 0.2 0.2 0.4 0.2 0.2 InitQueuDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Delay /Veh: 30.6 31.3 33.1 31.4 30.4 29.0 46.7 28.3 213.3 24.4 12.1 12.1 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel /Veh: 30.6 31.3 33.1 31.4 30.4 29.0 46.7 28.3 28.3 24.4 12.1 12.1 LOS by Move: C C C- C C C D C C C B B HCM2k85thQ: 5 7 10 7 5 2 2 8 8 10 15 15 Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. . atfix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA COMPARE _ ... . -.. - Fri Apr 30 10:36:03 2010 . - - - -. Page.3.2 Level Of'Servlce Computation Report 2000HCM0 perYlloris (FUl'ureV610nie Alternative) . -. - • - - - -. - - - -• -- - - ---- -- - -- ° -- - Ex +APp +Pr) +Pnd - PM Peak Intersection #1: University Ave. /Blossom Hill Rd: Sig nal =PermiURights= Include Initial Vol; 66 148 161 Lanes: 1 0 1 0 dTrr 1 Signal= Protect Signal =Protect Initlal Vol: Lanes: Rights= Include Vol Cnt Dale: 2/10/2010 Rights =lncl'ude Lanes: Initial Vol: Cycle Time (sec); 100 0 44 37 t *pr Loss Time (sec); 9 0 -F 420"' 1 Cdlical VIC: 0.428 is 1 424 1 Avg Cril Dal (sec/veh): 27.1 0 2g g Avg Delay (sec /veh): 25.4 1 154 LOS: C ;w }Ty, Lanes: 1 0 1 0 1 Initial Vol: 54 82 196 1 " Signal =Permit / Rlghts =l nclude Street Name: University Ave. Blossom Hill Rd. Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R II ---------- L - T - R - - - - - I ------------ I--------------- Min. Green: 10 10 II-------------- 10. 10 10 II ------ - -------- 10 .7 10 10 7 10 10 Y +R: _ 4.0- 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0. 4.0 fl --------------- 4.0 4.0 4.0 II --- - ----=- 4.0 4.0 4.0 - - - - - I ------------ I--------------- Volume Module: >> Count II------------- Date:.10 Feb 2010 << Base Vol: 54 71 172 1.61 131 66 37 378 27 126 392 44 Growth A_dj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1:00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: _ 54 71 172 1,61 131 66 37 378 _27 126 392 44 Added Vol: 0 11 24 0 17 0 0 42 1 28 32 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 54 82 196 16.1 ; 148 66 37 ,420 28. 154 424 44 User Adj_: 1.25 1x25 1.25 1:34 ' .34 1.34 1._25 1.25 1.25 1.15 1:15 1.15. PHF Adj:- 1.00 1.00 1.00 . 1 1":00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1:.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 68 103 245 216 -198 88 46 525 35 177 488 51 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 ' 0 , °,: 0 0 0 = 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced::Vol: 68 .10 245 216 196 88, ;.46 525 35 17T. 488 51 PCE Add`:,_ 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1:00 1:00. 1•.00 1.:00 1.00: 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adjr` 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.;00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1. -00 1:00 1.00 1.'00 1.00 FihalVolume: 68 103 245 II---------- 216 198 88 II --------------- 46 525- - 35' 11-- ---=---- - -177- 488- 51 - - - - - ------------ I--------------- Saturation .Flow Module: - - Sat /Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0:92 1.00 0.92 0..92 1.00 0..92 0.92 1.00 0'.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 Lanes: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1:00 1.00 1.00 1.87' 0.13 1.00 1:80 0.20:: Final Sat.: 175.0 1900 1750 II--------------- 1750 1900. 1750 II--------------- - 17 "50. 3.544. 236 11---------- 1750- 3415 354 - - - - -1. ------------- I --------------- Capacity Analysis Module: -; Vol /Sat: 0.04 0`.05 0.14 0,12 0.10 0.05 0.03 0.15 0.15 0.10 0.14 0.14 Crit Moves: * * ** * * ** * * ** Green Time: 32.7 32.7 32.7 32.7 32..7 32.7 19.2 34,.6 34.6 23.7 39.1 39.1 Volume /Cap: 0.12 0:16 0.43 0.38 0.32. 0.15 0.14 0.43' 0'.43 0.43 0.37 0.37 Uniform Del: 23 ;5 23.9 26.3 25..8 25.3 23::8 33.6 25.1 25:1 32.4 21.6 21.6 IncremritDel: 0 1 0.1 0.5 0.4 0.3 0:1 0.2 0.2 0:2 0.7 0.2 0.2 InitQueuDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0;0 0.0 0.0_ 0.0 0;0 04 0.0 0.0 0.0 Delay Ad-j: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1'.00' 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Delay /Veh: 23.6 24_.0 26,.8 2 6. 2 25.6 24.0 33.7 25.3. 25.3 33.1 21.8 21.8 User DelAdj: 1.00 1:00 1,00 1,_00 1:00 1 00 1.00 1..00' 1 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel /Veh: 23.6 2 26.8 26.2 25.6 24.0 33.7 2 25.3 33.1 21.8 21.8 1 LOS by N ve: C ~- C C C. _ C C C- C C C- C+ C + >- HCM2k85thQ: 2 4 10 9 .7 3 2 10, 10 8 9 9 Note:,_Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. TraHix 8.0.0715 Copydght (c) 2008'Doevling Assoclates, Inc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON. CA COMPARE Intersection #2: University Ave. /Roberts Rd. Fri Apr 30 10:36:03 2010 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM 4 -Way Stop (Future Volume Alternative) Ex +App +Pd +Pnd - AM Peak Page 3.3 S ign a I= Stop /Rights =1 n clude Initial Vol: 26 221 36 - Lanes: 41 0 0 _ 4 + 11 00 0 * Signal =Stop T Y Signal =Stop Initial Vol: Lanes: Rs =Include Vol Cnt Date: 2/10/2010 Rights= Include Lanes: Initial Vol: Cycle Time (see): 100 19 0 -0 12 - 0 Loss Time (sec): 0 0 16 11 __p, _ Critical V /C: 0.507 11 20- 0 -� Avg Cdt Del (sec /veh): 10.9 0 40 0 Avg Delay (sec /veh): 10.9 0 41 LOS: B Lanes: 0 0 11 0 0 Initial Vol: 39 302 49 Signal =S top /Rights =l nclu de Street Name: University Ave. Roberts Rd. Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound movement: L - T - ------------ I ---------- ----- R II--------------- L - T - R L - T - R L- T - R Min. Green: 0 0 ------------ I --------- ------ 0 II--------------- II--------------- 0 0 0 0 0 II---------- 1 0 0 0 - - - - - I 0 Volume Module: >> Count Date: II--------------- 10 Feb 2010 << II---------- - - - - - I Base Vol: 39 285 49 3 212 26 19 16 40 41 20 12 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 39 285 49 3 212 26 19 16 40 41 20 12 Added Vol: 0 17 0 33 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 39 302 49 36 221 26 19 16 40 41 20 12 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.100 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 39 302 49 36 221 26 19 16 40 41 20 12 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol:. 39 302 49 36 221 26 19 16 40 41 20 12 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 39 302 ------------ I --------------- 49 II 36 221 26 19 16 40 41 20 12 Saturation Flow Module: II--------------- II---------- - - - - - I Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 .1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 0.10 0.77 0.13 0.130.78 0.09 0.25 0.21 0.54 0.57 0.27 0.16 Final Sat.: 77 596 ------------ I --------------- 97 II 94 579 68 155 131 327 329 160 96 Capacity Analysis Module: II--------------- II---------- - - - - - I Vol /Sat: 0.51 0.51 0.51 0.38 0.38 0.38 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 Crit Moves: * * ** * * ** * * ** * * ** Delay /Veh: 11.9 11.9 11.9 10.4 10.4 10.4 8.9 8.9 8 ".9 9.2 9.2 9.2 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Del /Veh: 11.9 11.9 11.9 10.4 10.4 10.4 8.9 8.9 8.9 9.2 9.2 9.2 LOS by Move: B B B B B B A A A A A A ApproachDel: 11.9 10.4 8.9 9.2 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ApprAdjDel: 11.9 10.4 8.9 9.2 LOS by Appr: B B A A AllWayAvgQ: 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. Peak Hour Volume Signal Warrant Report [Urban] Intersection #2 University Ave. /Roberts Rd. TrafFlx 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA COMPARE .. _.. - __ .. Frl,Apr 30.10:36!03 201.0._._ _ .. Page 3-4 Future Volume Alternative—Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met ------------ I--------------- II--------------- 11- -------------- II ---------- - - - - - I Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L T R L T - R L - T - R ------------ I--------------- __------ II---------- - - - - - I Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Stop Sign, Stop Sign Lanese: __ 0 0 1! 0 0 01 0 1! _0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 Initial Vol: 39 302 49 36 221 26 19 16 40 41 20 12 ------------ I--------------- II----- f' I--------------- II------ I Major Street Volume: 673 Minor Approach Volume: 75 Minor Approach Volume Threshold: 325 SIGNAL WARRANT DISCLAIMER Thfs peak hour signal warrant analysis should be considered solely as an "indicator" of the likelihood of aff unsignalized intersection warranting , a traffic signal in the future. Intersections that.,exceed this warrant are probably more likely to meet one or more of the other volume based signal warrant (such as the 4 =hour for 8 -hour warrants).` The peak hour warrant analysis in' "this report is not intended to replace a rigorous and complete traffic signal warrant analysis by the responsible jurisdiction. Consideration of the other signal warrants, which is beyond the scope of this software, may yield diffe're -nt results. Traff k 8.0.0715 - - Copyright (6) 2008 Dowling•Assoclates, Inc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA COMPARE Fri Apr 30 10:36:03 2010 Page 3.5 Z��E Lanes: 0 0 11 0 0 Initial Vol: 26 268 48 Slg n al= Stop /Rig h 1s =1 n clud e Street Name: University Ave. Roberts Rd. Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ----- - ------ --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - - I Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ------------ I --- - ----------- II II--------------- II---------- - - - - -I Volume Module: >> Count Date: 10 Feb 2010 << Base Vol: 26 259 48 11 262 20 19 19 57 41 11 7 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 26 259 48 11 262 20 19 19 57 41 11 7 Added Vol: 0 9 0 51 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 26 268 48 62 282 20 19 19 57 41 11 7 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 26 268 48 62 282 20 19 19 57 41 11 7 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 26 268 48 62 282 20 19 19 57 41 11 7 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 26 268 48 62 282 20 19 19 57 41 11 7 ------------ I ---- - ---------- II ------------- -- II--------------- II---------- - - - - - I Saturation Flow Module: Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 0.08 0.78 0.14 0.17 0.78 0.05 0.20 0.20 0.60 0.69 0.19 0.12 Final Sat.: 57 588 105 127 577 41 123 123 368 390 105 67 ------------ I --------------- ---- ----------- II--------- - - - - -- Capacity Analysis Module: Vol /Sat: 0.46 0.46 0.46 0.49 0.49 0.49 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.11 0.11 0.11 Crit Moves: * * ** * * ** * * ** * * ** Delay /Veh: 11.3 11.3 11.3 11.9 11.9 11.9 9.1 9.1 9.1 9.3 9.3 9.3 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Del /Veh: 11.3 11.3 11.3 11.9 11.9 11.9 9.1 9.1 9.1 9.3 9.3 9.3 LOS by Move: B B B B B B A A A A A A ApproachDel: 11.3 11.9 9.1 9.3 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ApprAdjDel: 11.3 11.9 9.1 9.3 LOS by Appr: B B A A Al1WayAvgQ: 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. Peak Hour Volume Signal Warrant Report [Urban] ************************************************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** Intersection #2 University Ave. /Roberts Rd. ************************************************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** TrafOx 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM 4 -Way Stop (Future Volume Alternative) Ex +q +P' +Pnd -PM Peak Intersection #2: University Ave. /Roberts Rd, Signal =S top /Rlg hts =l n elude Initlal Vol: 20 282- 62 Lanes: 0 0 11 0 0 Signal =Stop Signal =Stop Initlal Vol: Lanes: Rights= Include Vol Cnt Date: 2/10/2010 Rlghts= Include Lanes: Initlal Vol: Cycle The (sec): 100 19 0 0 7 0 'Loss Time (sec): 0 0 19 "' 11 _1 �P" Critical V /C: 0.488 0 Avg Crit Del (sec /veh): 11,2 0 57 0 Avg Delay (seclveh): 11.2 0 41 Z��E Lanes: 0 0 11 0 0 Initial Vol: 26 268 48 Slg n al= Stop /Rig h 1s =1 n clud e Street Name: University Ave. Roberts Rd. Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ----- - ------ --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - - I Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ------------ I --- - ----------- II II--------------- II---------- - - - - -I Volume Module: >> Count Date: 10 Feb 2010 << Base Vol: 26 259 48 11 262 20 19 19 57 41 11 7 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 26 259 48 11 262 20 19 19 57 41 11 7 Added Vol: 0 9 0 51 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 26 268 48 62 282 20 19 19 57 41 11 7 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 26 268 48 62 282 20 19 19 57 41 11 7 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 26 268 48 62 282 20 19 19 57 41 11 7 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 26 268 48 62 282 20 19 19 57 41 11 7 ------------ I ---- - ---------- II ------------- -- II--------------- II---------- - - - - - I Saturation Flow Module: Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 0.08 0.78 0.14 0.17 0.78 0.05 0.20 0.20 0.60 0.69 0.19 0.12 Final Sat.: 57 588 105 127 577 41 123 123 368 390 105 67 ------------ I --------------- ---- ----------- II--------- - - - - -- Capacity Analysis Module: Vol /Sat: 0.46 0.46 0.46 0.49 0.49 0.49 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.11 0.11 0.11 Crit Moves: * * ** * * ** * * ** * * ** Delay /Veh: 11.3 11.3 11.3 11.9 11.9 11.9 9.1 9.1 9.1 9.3 9.3 9.3 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Del /Veh: 11.3 11.3 11.3 11.9 11.9 11.9 9.1 9.1 9.1 9.3 9.3 9.3 LOS by Move: B B B B B B A A A A A A ApproachDel: 11.3 11.9 9.1 9.3 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ApprAdjDel: 11.3 11.9 9.1 9.3 LOS by Appr: B B A A Al1WayAvgQ: 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. Peak Hour Volume Signal Warrant Report [Urban] ************************************************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** Intersection #2 University Ave. /Roberts Rd. ************************************************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** TrafOx 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA COMPARE Fri Apr 30 10:36:03 201 Page 3-6 Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met Approach: North Bound South East Bound West Bound Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Stop Sign Stop Sign initial Vol: 26 268 48 62 282 20 19 19 57 41 11 7 Major Street Volume: 706 Minor Approach Volume: »S Minor upncoaou volume zbzoobozu: 312 ^'1— _____________________________________________________________________ SIGNAL WauneNc ozanLuzMcn This peak hour aiouaz warrant analvis ounulu be considered solely as an "indicator" of the likelihood o signalized intersection warranting u traffic signal in the future. zoeotiouo that exceed this warrant are probably more likely to meet or more of the other vnzomo based signal warrant (such as the 4-hou£or 8-hour worran��a)'. The peak hour warrant aoazxoia iuntbia report is not iut,eouod to replace a rigorous and complete traffic signal warrant analysis by the responsible jurisdiction. Consideration of the other oigoaz��zranta,zvuiou is beyond ° the scope of this software, may yield difcei�bt result;. �� � Traffix 8.0,0716 Copyright (b) 2008 Dowling Associates, Ind, Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA t j COMPARE Fri Apr 30 10:36:03 2010 Page 3 -7 Trafrix 8.0.0715 _ Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM 4 -Way Slop (Future Volume Alternative) Ex +App +Pd +Pnd - AM Peak Intersection #3: University Ave. /Andrews St. Signal =S top /Rights =l nclu de Initial Vol: 110 - 206 0 Lanes: 0 1 -*1 4 0 0 �* 0 Slgnal =Slop Signal =Slop Initial Vol: Lanes: Rights= Include Vol Cnt Date: 2/10/2010 Rights= Include Lanes: Initial Vol: Cycle Time (sec): *** 100 69 0 0 0 Loss Time (sec): 0 0 g 0 11 _ Y Critical V /C: 0.774 0 0 0 Avg Crit Del (sec /veh): 1918 + 0 49 0 Avg Delay (seclveh): 19.8 _[� 0 +� 0 LOS: C -AL ) -4 � t f " I Lanes: 0 1 0 0 0 Initial Vol: 64 328*** 0 S ig n aI =S top / RI g h is =I n c l u d e Street Name: University Ave. Andrews St. Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R ------------ I ----------- ---- L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R II ----------- - - -- Min. Green: 0 0 0 ------------ I --------------- II 0 0 II--------------- 0 0 0 11-- 0 . ------------- 0 0 1 0 Volume Module: >> Count Date: II--------------- 10 Feb 2010 << II---------- - - - - - I Base Vol: 57 310 0 0 195 97 61 0 45 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 57 310 0 0 195 97 bl 0 45 0 0 0 Added Vol: 7 18 0 0 11 13 8 0 4 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 64 328 0 0 206 110 69 0 49 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.40 1.40 1.40 1.72 1.72 1.72 1.25 1.25 1.25 1.35 1.35 1.35 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 90 459- 0 0 354 189 86 0 61 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 90 459 0 0 354 1.89 86 0 61 0 0 0 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 90 459 0 ------------ I --------------- II--------------- 0 354 189 86 0 61 0 0 0 Saturation Flow Module: II--------------- II---------- - - - - - I Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 0.16 0.84 0.00 0.00 0.65 0.35 0.58 0.00 0.42 0.00 0.00 0.00 Final Sat.: 116 593 0 ------------ I --------------- II 0 480 257 318 0 226 0 0 0 Capacity Analysis Module: II--------------- II---------- - - - - - I Vol /Sat: 0.77 0.77 xxxx xxxx 0.74 0.74 0.27 xxxx 0.27 xxxx xxxx xxxx Crit Moves: * * ** * * ** * * ** Delay /Veh: 22.4 22.4 0.0 0.0 19.5 19.5 11.0 0.0 11.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Del /Veh: 22.4 22.4 0.0 0.0 19.5 19.5 11.0 0.0 11.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOS by Move: C C * * C C B * B ApproachDel: 22.4 19.5 11.0 xxxxxx Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 xxxxx ApprAdjDel: 22.4 19.5 11.0 xxxxxx LOS by Appr: C C B Al1WayAvgQ: 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.4 2.4 2.4 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. Peak Hour Volume Signal Warrant Report [Urban] ************************************************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** Intersection #3 University Ave. /Andrews St. ************************************************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** Trafrix 8.0.0715 _ Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA COMPARE Fri Apr 30 10:36:03.2010 Page 3 -B Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met ------------ I --------------- II --------------- II--------------- II--- ------- - - - - - I Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound -. _ Movement : L - T R L - T - R L T - R L - T - R ------------ I--------------- II-- -=----------- II--------------- LI-------- - - - - - I Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Stop Sign Stop Sign Lanes: 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Vol: 64 328 0 0 206 110 69 0 49 0 0 0 ------------ I--------------- II--------------- II --------------- II ---------- - - - - - I Major Street Volume: 708 Minor Approach Volume: 118 Minor Approach Volume Threshold: 311 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SIGNAL WARRANT DISCLAIMER This peak hour signal warrant analysis should be considered solely as an "indicator" of the likelihood of aft,unsignalized intersection warranting a traffic signal in the future. Intersections that exceed this warrant are probably more likely to meet one or more Of the other volume based signal warrant (such as the 4- hourtor 8 -hour warrants)`. The peak hour warrant analysis in this report is not intended to replace a rigorous and complete traffic signal warrant analysis by the responsible jurisdiction. Consideration of the other signal warrants,,,,which is beyond the scope of this software, may yield different 'results. TraffiX.8.0.0716 Copydght '(c)2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA COMPARE Fri Apr 30 10:36 :03 2010 - Page 3 -9 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM 4 -Way Stop (Future Volume Alternative) Ex+A +P' +Pnd- PMPeak Intersection #3: University Ave. /Andrews St. Signal =S top /Rig hts =1 nclu d e Initial Vol: 93 308 0 Lanes: 0 1 0 0 0 Signal =Stop Signal =Stop Initial Vol: Lanes: Rlghts= Include Vol Cnt Date: 2/10/2010 Rights= Include Lanes: Initial Vol: Cycle Time (sec): 100 128"` 0 0 0 Loss Time (sec): 0 0 0 0 11 Critical V /C: 0.690 0 0 0 Avg Cril Del {sec /veh): 15.4 D 106 0 Avg Delay (sec /veh): 15.4 0 0 LOS: C Lanes: 0 1 0 0 0 Initial Vol: 62 239- 0 Signal =S top /Rlg hts =l nclu de Street Name: University Ave. Andrews St. Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R ------------ I --------------- II ------ - ---- ---- L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Min. Green: 0 0 0 ------------ I --------------- II ---------- ----- 0 0 0 II--------------- 0 0 II---------- 0 0 0 - - - - - I 0 Volume Module: >> Count Date: 10 Feb 2010 << II--------------- II---------- - - - - - I Base Vol: 57 227 0 0 288 74 108 0 96 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 57 227 0 0 288 74 108 0 96 0 0 0 Added Vol: 5 12 0 0 20 19 20 0 10 0 0 0 PasserByVol: . 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 62 239 0 0 308 93 128 0 106 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.15 1.15 1.15 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 71 275 0 0 370 112 154 0 127 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 71 275 0 0 370 112 154 0 127 0 0 0 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 71 275 0 ------------ -------------- -II---------------II--------------- 0 370 112 154 0 127 0 0 0 Saturation Flow Module: Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 •1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 0.21 0.79 0.00 0,00 0.77 0.23 0.55 0.00 0.45 0.00 0.00 0.00 Final Sat.: 133 514 0 ------------ I --------------- II---------------II--------------- 0 536 162 327 0 271 0 0 0 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol /Sat: 0.53 0.53 xxxx xxxx 0.69 0.69 0.47 xxxx 0.47 xxxx xxxx xxxx Crit Moves: * * ** * * ** * * ** Delay /Veh: 14.0 14.0 0.0 0.0 17.9 17.9 13.0 0.0 13.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Del /Veh: 14.0 14.0 0.0 0.0 17.9 17.9 13.0 0.0 13.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOS by Move: B B * * C C B * B ApproachDel: 14.0 17.9 13.0 xxxxxx Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 xxxxx ApprAdjDel: 14.0 17.9 13.0 xxxxxx LOS by Appr: B C B Al1WayAvgQ: 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.9 1.9 1.9 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. Peak Hour Volume Signal Warrant Report [Urban] ************************************************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** Intersection #3 University Ave.' /Andrews St. Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright .(c).2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA COMPARE _. _ _.. _ FtI Apr 30:10:36:03.2010.._..... - -- - Page 3-10 Future Volume Alternative: - Peak =Hour Warrant - =NOT -Met ------------ I --------------- II--------------- II---- ----------- II ---------- - - - - - I Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West_Bound Movement t L - T - R L T R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I--------------- II - - = ='- 11 -==---------- fl---------- - - - - -I Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Stop Sign. Stop Sign Lanes 0 1. 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0' 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Vol: 62 239 0 0 308 93 128 " 0 106 0 0 0 - ----------- I--------------- II----------- II --------------- If --- - ------ - - - - - I Major Street Volume: 702 Minor Approach Volume: 234 Minor Approach Volume Threshold: 314 SIGNAL WARRANT DISCLAIMER This peak hour signal warrant analysis should -be considered solely as an "indicator "•of the likelihood of 6A.unsignalized intersection warranting ,Y a traffic signal in the future. Intersections thatl� exceed this warrant are probably more likely to meet one or more of the other volume based signal warrant (such as the 4- hour {or B -hour warrants) Y . The peak hour warrant analysis in this report is not intended to replace a rigorous and complete traffic signal warrant analysis by the responsible jurisdiction. Consideration of the other signal } � warrants,which beyond the scope.of this software, may yield different 'results. Trafftk 6AUM r bg t'(c) 20D8 D. Ind AssocOes, Inca Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON; CA COMPARE Frl Apr 30 10:30:03 2010 Page 3 -11 Street Name: University Ave. Towne Terrace Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I --------------- II --------------- II --------------- II ---------- - - - - - I Volume Module: >> Fount Date: 10 Feb 2010 << Base Vol: 0 338 16 13 235 0 0 0. 0 93 0 40 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00" 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 338 16 13 235 0 0 0 0 93 0 40 Added Vol: 0 6 1 4 15 0 0 0 0 4 0 16 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 0 344 17 17 250 0 0 0 0 97 0 56 User Adj:. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 0 344 17 17 250 0 0 0 0 97 0 56 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FinalVolume: 0 344 17 17 250 0 0 0 0 97 0 56 ------------ ------- II II--------------- II---------- - - - - - I Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 4.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 6.4 xxxx 6.2 FollowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 2.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 3.5 xxxx 3.3 ------------ I --------------- II--------------- II --------------- II---------- - - - - - I Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx.xxxxx 361 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx-xxxxx 637 xxxx 353 Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1209 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 445 xxxx 696 Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1209 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 440 xxxx 696 Volume /Cap: xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.01 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.22 xxxx 0.08 ------------ I ------------- -- II--------------- 11--------------- II---------- - - - - -I Level Of Service Module: 2Way95thQ: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.8 xxxx 0.3 Control Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 8.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 15.5 xxxx 10.6 LOS by Move: * * * A * * * * * C * B Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 8.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * A ApproachDel: xxxxxx- xxxxxx xxxxxx 13.7 ApproachLOS: * * * B Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. Peak Hour Delay Signal Warrant Report ************************************************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** Intersection #4 University Ave. /Towne Terrace Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met rraffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized (Future Volume Alternative) Ex +App +Pd +Pnd - AM Peak Intersection #4: University Ave./Towne Terrace S ig n al =U n contro I /Righ ts= Include Initial Vol: 0 250 17 Lanes: 0 0 0 1 0 41 4 - Slgnal =Stop Signal =Stop Initial Vol: Lanes: Rights= Include Vol Cnt Date: 2/10/2010 Cycle Time (sec): 100 Rights= Include Lanes: Initial Vol: 0 0 1 56 o Loss Time (sec): 0 g 0 D g_ �- Critical V /C: 0.220 0 0 0 Avg Crit Del (sec /veh): 2.9 0 0 0 Avg Delay (sec /veh): 2.9 1, 97 LOS: B Lanes: 0 0 0 1 0 Initial Vol: 0 344 17 Slg n al= Uncontrol /Rig hts =l nclude Street Name: University Ave. Towne Terrace Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I --------------- II --------------- II --------------- II ---------- - - - - - I Volume Module: >> Fount Date: 10 Feb 2010 << Base Vol: 0 338 16 13 235 0 0 0. 0 93 0 40 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00" 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 338 16 13 235 0 0 0 0 93 0 40 Added Vol: 0 6 1 4 15 0 0 0 0 4 0 16 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 0 344 17 17 250 0 0 0 0 97 0 56 User Adj:. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 0 344 17 17 250 0 0 0 0 97 0 56 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FinalVolume: 0 344 17 17 250 0 0 0 0 97 0 56 ------------ ------- II II--------------- II---------- - - - - - I Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 4.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 6.4 xxxx 6.2 FollowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 2.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 3.5 xxxx 3.3 ------------ I --------------- II--------------- II --------------- II---------- - - - - - I Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx.xxxxx 361 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx-xxxxx 637 xxxx 353 Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1209 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 445 xxxx 696 Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1209 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 440 xxxx 696 Volume /Cap: xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.01 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.22 xxxx 0.08 ------------ I ------------- -- II--------------- 11--------------- II---------- - - - - -I Level Of Service Module: 2Way95thQ: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.8 xxxx 0.3 Control Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 8.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 15.5 xxxx 10.6 LOS by Move: * * * A * * * * * C * B Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 8.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * A ApproachDel: xxxxxx- xxxxxx xxxxxx 13.7 ApproachLOS: * * * B Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. Peak Hour Delay Signal Warrant Report ************************************************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** Intersection #4 University Ave. /Towne Terrace Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met rraffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA COMPARE _ Fri Apr 30':10:36:03:2010. _ _. Page 3 -12 -- I---- - - - - -_ ---- 11--------------- II-- ------ -------II -- -- -- --- - - - - -I Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound' West Bound Movement: L - T R L T R_ L- T - R L = T - R ------------ I-------- - - - - -- II -- - II -- --------- II---------- - - - - -I Control: Uncontrolled 'Uncontrolled' = `= Stop`Sign Stop Sign LAn6S 0 0- " °0 1 .._ 0_ 0 1 0 0' 0 0 0 ..0. 0 1 0 0; 0 1 Initial Vol: -. 0 344. 17 17._.._250 _. _...,_ 0 0 0 97 0 56 ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx 13.7 -------- - - - -I- ------------- LI--------------- I I----------- II ---------- - - - - - I Approach[ westbound ][lanes= 2][control =Stop Sign] Signal Warrant Rule #1: [vehicle- hours =0 6]� FAIL - Vehicle -hours less than 5_for,.two or more lane approach. Signal Warrant Rule #2: [approach volume =1531• SUCCEED - Approach volume >= 15(0 for two or more - lane "approach. Signal Warrant Rule 43: [approach ,4count= 3][total volume: =781] SUCCEED - Total volume greater;; than or equal to 650 for intersection ; with less than four . v. -------------------------------------------------------------------------- - - - - -- SIGNAL WARRANT DISCLAIMER This peak hour signal warrant analysis should be considered solely as an "indicator" of the likelihood of an unsignalized intersection warranting a traffic signal in the future: Intersections that ^''exceed this warrant are more likely to meet one or more of the other -volume based signal warrant (such as the 4- hour or 8 -hour warrants')``. The . peak hour warrant analysis in this report. is 'not intended to replace a rigorous and complete traffic signal warrant by the responsible jurisdiction. Consideration of the other signal warrants, which is beyond the scope of this- software; _may yield different results. Peak Hour Volume Signal Warrant Report [Urban] Intersection #4 University Ave. /Towne Terrace Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met ------------ I-=-=--.------.-.-- II--------------- II- ___.._ --------- 11 -- .------- - - - - -I Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T -- R L - T - R L -! T - R L - T - R ------------ I-----=.--------- L1--------------- II------------- II------ I Control::- Uncontrolled Uncontrolled : Stop Sign 1. Stop Sign Lanes _ 0 :0 '0 = 1 ,. 0..: 0 `'`0. 0 `? 0 0 0 0 0- 0 1 0 °0 0 1 Initial Vol: 0 344 17 17 250 0 0 0 0 97 0 56 ------- ----- I--------------- II--------------- II---=-- II --------- - - - - - - I Major Street Volume: J, 628 Minor Approach Volume: . 153 Minor Approach Volume Threshold: 439 SIGNAL. WARRANT,iDIS CLAIMER - This peak;hottr:sigri'a1 war an t: -an alysis.: be.'considered solely as an "indicator" of the likelihood of am-unsignalized intersection warranting a traffic..signal , in the future. Intersections that. exceed this warrant - are probably' more.1kely:to7 meet one or more of-the-other volume-based- signal warrant (such as the.4 -hour or 8 -hour warrants)... The peak hour warrant analysis in this report is not intended to replace a rigorous and complete traffic signal warrant analysis by the responsible jurisdiction. Consideration of the other signal warrants, which is beyond the scope of this software; may::yield Trafflx 6.0:0715 CopyrIgfiR(o) 2000'Dowling Ass6c1" "a(ea,' -1nc: Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA I f� COMPARE Fri Apr 30 10:36:03 2010 Page 3 -13 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized (Future Volume Alternative) Ex +App +Pd +Pnd - PM Peak Intersection #4: University Ave./Towne Terrace S Ig nal =Uncon tro I /Rlghts =l nclude Initial Vol: 0 345 72 Lanes: 0 0 0 1 0 Signal =Slop Slgnal =Stop Initial Vol: Lanes: Rlghts= Include Vol Cnt Date: 2/10/2010 Rights= Include Lanes: Initial Vol: Cycle Time (sec): 100 0 0 1 39 Loss Time (sec): 0 0 0 0 0 Critical V /C: 0.128 0 0 0 Avg Crit Del (sec /veh): 2.1 0 0 0 Avg Delay (sec /veh): 2.1 1 •45 LOS: B Lanes: 0 0 0 1 0 Initial Vol: 0 258 56 S Ig na1=U n con lro l /Rlghts=) nclu de Street Name: University Ave. Towne Terrace Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I--------------- II ---------- L - T - R II--------------- II---------- Volume Module: >> Count Date: 10 Feb 2010 << - - - - - I Base Vol: 0 251 52 59 326 0 0 0 0 43 0 31 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 251 52 59 326 0 0 0 0 43 0 31 Added Vol: 0 7 4 13 19 0 0 0 0 2 0 8 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 0 258 56 72 345 0 0 0 0 45 0 39 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 0 258 56 72 345 0 0 0 0 45 0 39 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FinalVolume: 0 258 56 72 345 0 0 0 0 ------------ --------------- 11 45 0 39 II II Critical Gap Module: I Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 4.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 6.4 xxxx 6.2 FollowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 2.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx ---------- I --------------- II 3.5 xxxx 3.3 I1--------------- II---------- Capacity Module: - - - - -I Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 314 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 775 xxxx 286 Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1258 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 369 xxxx 758 Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1258 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 352 xxxx 758 Volume /Cap: xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.06 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx ------------ I --------------- 0.13 xxxx 0.05 li II--------------- II---------- Level Of Service Module: - - - - - I 2Way95thQ: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.4 xxxx 0.2 Control Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 8.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 16.7 xxxx 10.0 LOS by Move: * * * A * * * * * C * B Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 8.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * A ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx 13.6 ApproachLOS: * * * B Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. Peak Hour Delay Signal Warrant Report ************************************************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** Intersection #4 University Ave. /Towne Terrace ************************************************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met Traffix 8.0.0716 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA COMPARE __PrI Apr- 30.10:36:03.2010 Page.3 -14 - -`----- ----- I - - - -- II--- ------------ 11 --------------- II--------------- I Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L _ T ' - . L - T .. R -:- ., L T R: L -- . T R. . ------------ 1-------------- II - - -- II ------------- II - - - - -- - - - - - - Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled: =` _ -,Stop Sign Stop Sign Lanes : 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1. Initial Vol: 0 258 56 72 345 0 0 0 0 45 0 39 Approach Del: xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx 13.6 ------------ I--------------- II--------------- fl------- =------- II---=----------- I Approach[ westbound ][lanes= 21[control =Stop Sign] Signal Warrant Rule #1: [vehicle- hours =0 3] °' FAIL - Vehicle -hours less than 5 for,two or more lane approach. Signal Warrant Rule #2: [approach volume =841 ' FAIL - Approach volume less than 150 for two or'inbl:e lane approach. Signal Warrant Rule #3: [approach count= 3][total volume =815] SUCCEED - Total volume greater than or equal to .650 for intersection with less than four approaches. F -------------------------------------------------------------------------.------- SIGNAL WARRANT DISCLAIMER V This peak hour signal warrant - analysis should be con sdered. as an "indicator" of the likelihood of dri unsignalized. intersection warranting a traffic signal in the future. Intersections that'exceed this warrant are probably more likely to meet one more „of the other volume based signal warrant (such as the 4 -hour or 8- hour "warrants)` The peak hour warrant analysis in this report,is not intended to rep a rigorous and complete traffic signal warrant,.analys.is the responsible jurisdiction. Consideration of the other signal warrants, which is beyond the scope of this software,•may yield different result's. Peak Hour Volume Signal Warrant Report. [Urban] Intersection #4 University Ave. /Towne Terrace Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT ------------ I --------------- II-------- 11------- - -------- II---------- - - - - -1 Approach:: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I--------------- II--------------- II --------------- II ---------- - - - - - I Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Lanes: 0 0- 0 1 0 0::.1 = 0 0 0 0 0 0- 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 Initial Vol: 1 0. 258 56 72 345 - 0 0 0 0 45 0- 39 -------- - --- I--------------- II--------------- II------------- II ------=--- - - - - - I Major Street Volume: 731 Minor Approach..Volume: 84 Minor Approach Volume Threshold: 391 --------------------------- SIGNAL WARRANT: DISCLAIMER " This peak. hour; signal warrant' analysis should bee. considered solely as can ” indicator" of the likelihood of an unsignalized °intersection warranting a traffic signal in the future. Intersections that exceed this warrant are probably more likely to meet one or , more.of. the other volume based' signal warrant (such as the 4 -hour or 8- hour warrants) : . The peak hour warrant analysis in this report is not intended to replace a rigorous and complete traffic signal warrant analysis by the responsible jurisdiction. Consideration of the other signal warrants, which :i's' beyond the scope of this software, may "yield different results`. - - Trafgx 6.0:0715 Copydght(d) 2008 Dowling Assoc6fes, Inc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON,'CA COMPARE Fri Apr 30 10:36:03.2010 Page 3.15 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unslgnalized (Future Volume Alternative) Ex +A +p' +Pnd -AM Peak Intersection #5: University Ave. /Chester St. Slgnal= Uncontrol /Rights = Include - Initial Vol: 0 324 15 Lanes: 0 0 1 - 0 1 A Slgnal =Stop Signal =Stop Initial Vol: Lanes: Rights= Include Vol Cnt Date: 2/10/2010 Rlghts= Include Lanes Initial Vol: Cycle Time (sec): 100 D D 0 18 Loss Time (sec): 0 0 0 0 0 Critical V /C: 0.035 11 0 0 Avg Drit Del (sec /veh): 0.7 p 0 0 Avg Delay (sec /veh): 0.7 0 14 LOS:: B I Lanes: 0 0 0 1 0 Initial Vol: 0 346 6 Slgnal =U n c o n tro l/ Rl g h is =I n c l u d e Street Name: University Ave. Chester St. Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R - - - -- L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Volume Module: >> Count Date: 10 Feb 2010 << - - - -I Base Vol: 0 339 6 15 305 0 0 0 0 14 0 18 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.0D 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 339 6 15 305 0 0 0 0 14 0 18 Added Vol: 0 7 0 0 19 0 0 0 0 0 0. 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 0 346 6 15 324 0 0 0 0 14 0 18 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 0 346 6 15 324 0 0 0 0 14 0 18 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FinalVolume: 0 346 6 ------------ I --------------- II ------------ --- 15 324 0 0 0 0 14 0 18 Critical Gap Module: II--------------- II---------- - - - - - I Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 4.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 6.4 6.5 6.2 FollowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx . xxxxx ------------ I --------------- II 2.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 3.5 4.0 3.3 Capacity Module: II--------------- II----- ----- - - - - - I Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 352 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 703 703 349 Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1218 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 407 364 699 Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1218 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 403 360 699 Volume /Cap: xxxx xxxx xxxx ------------ I --------------- 0.01 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.03 0.00 0.03 II--------------- Level Of Service Module: II--------------- II---------- - - - - - I 2Way95thQ: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Control Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 8.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: * * * A Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 529 xxxxx SharedQueue :xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 0.2 xxxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 8.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 12.2 xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * A * * * * * * B ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx 12.2 ApproachLOS: * * * B Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. Peak Hour Delay Signal Warrant Report ************************************************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** Intersection #5 University Ave. /Chester St. ************************************************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc, Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA Signal Warrant Rule #3: [approach vo.lumeF=723] SUCCEED - Total volume greater an or equal to 650 for intersection with less than four a0p .1 ,roaches. SIGNAL WARRANT DISCLAIMER This peak hour signal warrant ana should be considered solely as an * �hood of .6. unsignalized intersection warranting "indicator" of the likell a traffic signal in the future. Intersectiong that'exceed this warrant are I probably more likely to meet 'one or more of - the other.-volume,.based signal warrant (such as thd 4 or 8-houi�warran s Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound control: Uncontrolled oh, d - o . r i V r . o 111 e Op Sign Stop Sign Approach(westbound][lanes=ll[control Sign) Signal Warrant Rule 41: [vehicle FAIL - Vehicle-hours less than 4 for. one lane abproach. Signal Warrant Rule #2: [approach volume=32) FAIL - Approach volume less thab,100 for One 1 an e r o a c h . The peak hour warrant analysis in this report is not.intendbd - to re Tace a rigorous and complete traffic signal warrant analysis...by t responsible jurisdiction. Consideration of the other signal warrants, which is beyond the scope of this software, may yield different results Peak uouv vulmu= "i ""=r""^` Report [ ` Intersection 45 nuiversityave`/oboatez St. m/tnze volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant mor`set --------�---|----,-------- ||------------�--||--�------------| |---------------| North Bound South � Approach: oc ouu ou ouu East Bound West Bound o Movement: L - z - u L -^r -'o L -'z - n L -�r - u ' -----------|------------||---------------||--------------| |---------------| 000tcoz, �.n000atrolzeu _n�oobtrolled -'atog'aigu ..Stop ainu Lanes: n O ~o l 'o o l 'o o ro..: o O - a o o n n I! o o Initial Vol: o 346 ��s- 15 324 'n O O o 14 -n 18 ` ------------|-,--- 7 -----+--||---------------||--------------| |---- ----------| Major Street Volume: ^ syI ' ' - Minor appzoach,.vozvme: so Minor Approanuvolame Threshold:- 318- — _ - ' --_-_ _ _ ---------_----------------------------------------------__���--__---_ SIGNAL WARRANT� DISCLAIMER" - r o�� This peak hour:,.signal,�warrant anal i 6 �an! r -r iuui czi�� eu tui are v'more likely to one `more of the' ot6er volume based/ signal warrant (such as tueA-hour or o-hour wazranta).`' The peak warrant auazvaio iu- this report is not intended to replace a rigorous and c the responsible � jurisdiction. Consideration the other s, wuioi i beyond the scope of this software, may yield.dizroreot m� ' - ^ ' ~ �` f i COMPARE Fri Apr 30 10:36:03 2010 Page 3.17 Intersection #5: University Ave, /Chester St. Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unslgnalized (Future Volume Alternative) Ex +App +Pd +Pnd -PM Peak , Signal =Un con trot /Rights =l nclu de Initial Vol: 0 368 21 Lanes: 0 0 1 0 1 0 Signal =Stop Signal =Stop Initial Vol: Lanes: Rs= Include Vol Cnt Date: 2/10/2010 Rights= Include Lanes: Initial Vol: Cycle Time (sec): 100 0 0 J 0 1 Loss Time (sec); 0 0. 0 0 0 Critical V /C: 0.017 11 0. 0 Avg Crit Del (sec /veh): 0.3 0 0 0 Avg Delay (secNeh): 0.3 0 3 LOS: B I Lanes: 0 0 0 1 0 Initial Vol: 0 306 19 Slgn al= Uncontrol /Rights= Include Street Name: University Ave. Chester St. Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R ------------ I -------- - - - ---- II--------------- L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Volume Module: >> Count Date: 11--------------- II---------- 10 Feb 2010 << - - - - -I Base Vol: 0 294 19 21 347 0 0 0 0 3 0 1 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 294 19 21 347 0 0 0 0 3 0 1 Added Vol: 0 11 0 0 21 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 0 305 19 21 368 0 0 0 0 3 0 1 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1:00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 0 305 19 21 368 0 0 0 0 3 0 1 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FinalVolume: 0 305 19 --- I --------------- II 21 368 0 0 0 0 3 0 1 Critical Gap Module: II--------------- II---------= - - - - - I Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 4.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 6.4 6.5 6.2 FollowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx ------------ I ----------- II 2.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 3.5 4.0 3.3 Capacity Module: II--------------- II---------- - - - - - I Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 324 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 725 725 315 Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1247 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 395 354 731 Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1247 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 390 348 731 Volume /Cap: xxxx xxxx xxxx ------------ I --------------- 0.02 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.01 0.00 0.00 II Level Of Service Module: II--------------- II---------- - - - - - I 2Way95thQ: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Control Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 7.9 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: * * * A Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 442 xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxxx Shrd ConDel :xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 7.9 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 13.2 xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * A * * * * * * B ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx 13.2 ApproachLOS: * * * B Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. Peak Hour Delay Signal Warrant Report ************************************************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** Intersection 45 University Ave. /Chester St. ************************************************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA COMPARE .- .. _ Prf. Apr 30.10:36:03:2010 .. - -- Page 3-1 -- -- I ------- 1- -- - - - --- - --- =- -b1--------------- II - - - - -- 11_- :_------- -- =--I Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T R. L .,. T .. R L . T - . R. L...._- T.:, ... _ - Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign - _ banes : 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 .. 0. - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 Initia "l Vol: 0 30 5 19 21 368 - 0 - 0 0 0 3 "" 0" 1 ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx I xxxxxx 13.2 ------------ I--------------- 11--------------- I1---- ----- - ----- II ---- -= ---- - - - - - I Approach[ westbound ][lanes= l][control =Stop Sign] Signal Warrant Rule #1: [vehicle- hours =0 0] _1 FAIL - Vehicle - hours less than 4 .for,,one lane approach. Signal Warrant Rule #2: [approach volume =41 FAIL - Approach volume less tha" 100 for one lane approach. Signal Warrant Rule #3: [approach" 6unt =3][total volume =717] SUCCEED - Total volume greater or equal to 650 for intersection with less than four approaches. ----------------------------------- --------------------------------------------- SIGNAL WARRANT DISCLAIMER �. This peak hour signal warrant ,analysis should be considered solely as an "indicator" of the likelihood of an unsignalized intersection warranting a traffic signal in the future. Intersections that exceed this warrant are probably more likely to meet one or more of the other volume based signal warrant (such as the 4 -hour or 8- hour�warralnts) - . The peak hour warrant analysis in this report is not intended to replace a rigorous and complete traffic signal warrant,.an_alysis,,by the, responsible jurisdiction. Consideration of the other signal warrants; which is beyond the scope of this software, may yield different results. Peak Hour Volume Signal Warrant Report Intersection #5 University Ave. /Chester St. Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met — --------- I --------------- II—=----=-------- II--------------- I[------------ — ='I Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I ------------ --- II--------------- II--------=------ II---------- - - - - - I Control:. Uncontrolled Uncontrolled - =:Stop Sign -Stop Sign -- Lanes : 0 0 0. 1 " 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 Initial Vol: 0 305 .19 21 368 0 0 0 0 3 0 1 ------------ 1--------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - -I Major Street Volume 713 Minor Approach - Volume: 4 Minor Approach- Volume- Threshold: 310 SIGNAL WARRANT.DISCLAIMER. This peak hour: signal' warrant- analysis 'should be considered: °solely as an " "indicator" of the likelihood of an- unsignalized intersection a traffic signal in the future. Intersections that exceed this warrant- - are probably more likely to one -or more of the other volume based signal warrant (such as the.4 -hour or 8- hour warrants) The peak hour warrant analysis in this report is not intended to replace a rigorous and complete ,traffic signal-warrant analysis - by the-responsible jurisdiction. Consideration of the other signal warrants, which is beyond . the scope this software, may yield different results. Traffix 8.0:0715 Copyrlght (c)`2008 "Dowllhg AssoclaTes,-nccr - Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON', CA j , COMPARE Fri Apr 30 10;36:03 2010 Page 3.19 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative) Ex +App +Prj - -AM Peak Intersection #6: University Ave. /Los Gatos Saratoga Rd. S ig na I =P ermlt/Rig hts =1 n clu de Initial Vol: 49 139'"• 150 Lanes: 0 1 0 0 1 Slgnal= Protect Slgnal= Protect Initial Vol: Lanes: Righ is= Include Vol Cnt Date: 2/10/2010 Rights = Include Lanes: Initial Vol: '' Cycle Time (sec): 120 31 1 0 159 0 Loss Time (sec): 9 1 731 1 Critical VIC: 0.735 1 1189 1 Avg Crit Del (sec /veh): 22.5 0 42 0 Avg Delay (sec /veh): 29.2 1 235 LOS: C Lanes: 1 0 1 0 1 Initial Vol: 61 159 177 Slgnal= Permlt/Rights =l nclude Street Name: University kve. Los Gatos Saratoga Rd. Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - ------------ I --------------- T - R II L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Min. Green: 10 10 10 10 10 II--------------- 10 7 10 11---------- 10 7 10 - - - - -I 10 Y +R: 4.0 ------------ I ----------- ---- 4.0 4.0 II--------------- 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Volume Module: >> Count Date: II--------------- 10 Feb 2010 << II- --------- - - - - - I Base Vol: 57 152 177 140 130 49 31 713 41 236 1175 158 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 57 152 177 140 130 49 31 713 41 236 1175 158 Added Vol: 4 7 0 10 9 0 0 18 1 -1 14 1 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 61 159 177 150 139 49 31 731 42 235 1189 159 User Adj: 1.40 1.40 1.40 1.72 1.72 1.72 1.25 1.25 1.25 1.35 1.35 1.35 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 85 223 248 258 239 84 39 914 53 317 1605 215 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 85 223 248 258 239 84 39 914 53 317 1605 215 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.0.0 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 .1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 85 ------------ I --------------- 223 248 II 258 239 84 39 914 53 317 1605 215 Saturation Flow Module: II--------------- II---------- - - - - - I Sat /Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 Lanes: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.72 0.28 1.00 1.88 0.12 1.00 1.75 0.25 Final Sat.: 1750 ------------ I --------------- 1900 1750 II 1750 1374 484 1750 3577 206 1750 3318 444 Capacity Analysis Module: II--------------- II---------- - - - - - I Vol /Sat: 0.05 0.12 0.14 0.15 0.17 0.17 0.02 0.26 0.26 0.18 0.48, 0.48 Crit Moves: * * ** * * ** * * ** Green Time: 27.5 27.5 27.5 27.5 27.5 27.5 7.0 48.8 48.8 34.7 76.5 76,5 Volume /Cap: 0.21 0.51 0.62 0.64 0.76 0.76 0.38 0.63 0.63 0.63 0.76 0.76 Uniform Del: 37.5 40.4 41.5 41.8 43.1 43.1 54.4 28.3 28.3 37.1 15.3 15.3 IncremntDel: 0.3 1.0 2.9 3.5 7.7 7.7 2.4 0.8 0.8 2.5 1.5 1.5 InitQueuDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Delay /Veh: 37.7 41.4 44.4 45.4 50.9 50.9 56.8.29.2 29.2 39.6 16.7 16..7 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Del /Veh: 37.7 41.4 44.4 45.4 50.9 50.9 56.8 29.2 29.2 39.6 16.7 16.7 LOS by Move: D+ D D D D D E+ C C D B B HCM2k85thQ: 4 11 15 15 19 19 3 22 22 16 35 35 Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON,CA -° ' Initial Vol: w *m 192 Lanes: o 1 o o 1 J \' Slgnal=Protect ' .'' Initial Vol: Lanes: 2/10/2010 Lanes: Initial Vol: �� opmr�"*°* 120 r� m 1 -' » `«` Loss The o o o�=n�� 0.909 - � mm � x�omnm*u��� «m � � '^ 92 o -� an��*e�w ^ - mm -�� ~� 3`19 � LOS: D+ Lane" , o 1 o 1 `^~ Initial Vol: e xn 307~ ^ ~ Street Name: oniveroit» Ave. '^ oat6a Saratoga ad. Approach: North Bound aonth Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - r. - m L - r - R L - r - n L - z - u ----------|---------------||--------------- Min. Green: 10 10 10 10 lO lo �------||-------------| -7 18 10 r lO 10 x+n: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 ||---_=--------- 4.0 *.n *.o ||--------- 4.0 ^.o ------ 4.0 -----------|--------------- Volume Module: >> Count ||---------------- Date: lO Feb unlo </ ~' Base vol: 67 122 305 181 135 *o 67 1137 on 3I3 802 I44 Growth adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 l.00 1.00 1�.00 l.Vo 1 Initial Boe: 67 lcz 305 lnz iau 44 67 1137 68 azs oou 144 Added vol: 29 9 2 lI zz O b zn 24 6 ^27 '2.'' eaauezayvoz: o o 0 n 0 o 0 o O o n rV' Initial rot' yo 131 307 lyo 146 oo 67 1152 319 829 - oaoz edj` 1.25 1.2,5 1.25 1.04 1.04 1,3* 1.25 1`;i5 ' yz z,os- 1.15 1'15 �i«6 z.lo eoF 1.00 1�h0 1.00 1.08 1'.00 1.00 1.00 1 1.00' 1.60 zd}n 1.00 puF Volume: 120 164 384 257 �96 59 115 3e7 953 168� xedunt v61/ ' 0 ' o o n � 0 n .0 ' .�n ''o Vol: 120 164 aA« 2�1 196 59 i15 I68 r� � '���' zVl'.Uo '.o - ` ; '` 1.00 1.00 I100 1 l�U 1 h0 1.00 z 1.00 oLF ' I.00 1J�' 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ij0-1 00 1.00 l on 1.00 1.00 Fiva lumo: 120 164 384 25i zAo `59 -^||---- v54 1440 ��- ------�-||~-- i�s s�7 963 --�-----1 `�16n ------------ |--------------- Saturation rz -' Module: ||--------------- ^" ~ Sat/Lane: �o , l9Oo 1 euo l9n0 1900 lyno 1900 1900 zynn Adjustment: 0 I.00 Q 0:.92 1.VO� O�9z o.90 1.0o 0.pz o.�oz`on 0.92 Lanes: 1,00 1.00 z�uo 1,00 0.75 0*15 �1' 1.84 0,16 1;00 l,s@ 0.32 Final oat.: 175-0 1900 1750 1750 1432 ---------------- 431 1750 3497 ----------------||-�����---------1 279 zTsV 3190 snz -----------|-----�---------1 Capacity Analysis Module: ` _ vol/aat: ` 0.07 d�.nq 0,22 0.15 o,i4 O.z4 V.os`n;4z- 0 0'21 0"30 0.30 crit Moves: nze=n.cinie:` 29.6 29.0 29.0 2 29.0 13.4 54.4 54.4 27.7-6o.6 6o.6` _ h/�V 0.36 0.'91 o�6I V��7 V�7 � «s�V�l o� p n�gz 0`91'0'52 ` Uniform Del: 37'1 37.8 44.2 48.5 48.o 40.0 A9.7 sn.s 30.5 44 -y 15'7 15.7 Incremnt 0.4 0.5 23.2 2j6 i 7 1.7 1.5 7.6 Y. 6 c«.o 0.± n��''``' InitQueuDe 0.0 0.0 o'O 0110 0.0 n'n_ 8.A 8'0 V 0..0 0 .1. 0 ,o 0.0, � Delay Adj I.O'o l.On l.no l�bo 1.0n 1.00 1^0bl�b8 1.00 1 140 1.00 Note: Queue reported is the number of c -er COMPARE Fri Apr 30 10:36:03,2010- Page 3-20 - ORDINANCE OF THE TOWN OF LOS GATOS AMENDING THE TOWN CODE EFFECTING A ZONE CHANGE FROM RM:12 -20 TO RM:12 -20:PD FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 135 RIVIERA DRIVE THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF LOS GATOS DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I The Town Code of the Town of Los Gatos is hereby amended to change the zoning on property at 135 Riviera Drive (Santa Clara County Assessor Parcel Numbers 529 -13 -016, 529 -09- 027, 031 and 034) as shown on the map attached hereto as Exhibit A, and is part of this Ordinance, from RM:12 -20 (Multi- Family Residential) to RM :5 -12:PD (Multi - Family Residential, Planned Development). SECTION II The PD (Planned Development Overlay) zone established by this Ordinance authorizes the following.construction and use of improvements: 1. Retention of 123 existing apartment units (25 to be converted to BMP units). 2. Removal of existing pool, landscape improvements and carports. 3. Construction of 50 new apartment units within four buildings. 4. Construction of a new pool and spa, fitness and leasing centers, and carports. 5. Designation and implementation of 26 BMP units; 25 low income units within existing buildings and one (1) moderate income unit in a new building. 6. Landscaping, private street, parking and other improvements shown and required on the Official Development Plan. 7. Uses permitted are those specified in the RM (Multiple- Family Residential) zone by Sections 29 10 (Permitted Uses) and 29.20.185 (Conditional Uses) of the Zoning Ordinance, as those sections exist at the time of the adoption of this Ordinance, or as they maybe amended in the future. However, no use listed in Section 29.20.185 is allowed unless specifically authorized by this Ordinance, or by a Conditional Use Permit Page 1 of 26 EXHIBIT 12 SECTION III COMPLIANCE WITH OTHER DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS All provisions of the Town Code apply, except when the Official Development Plan specifically shows otherwise. SECTION IV Architecture and Site Approval is required before construction work for the new apartments, fitness and leasing centers, whether or not a permit is required for the work and before anypermit for construction is issued. Construction permits shall only be in a manner complying with Section 29.80.130 of the Town Code. SECTION V The attached Exhibit A (Map), and Exhibit B (Official Development Plans), are part of the Official Development Plan. The following conditions must be complied with before issuance of any grading, or construction permits (mitigation measures are so noted and are flagged with an asterisk): TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT: Planning Division 1. OFFICIAL DEVELOPMENT PLANS. The Official Development Plans provided are conceptual in nature. Final building footprints and building designs shall be determined during the Architecture and Site approval process. Colors and building materials shown on the Official Development Plan are not approved and shall be reviewed during the Architectural and Site approval process. 2. TOWN INDEMNITY. Applicants are notified that Town Code Section 1.10.115 requires that any applicant who receives a permit or entitlement from the Town shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the Town and its officials in any action brought by a third party to overturn, set aside, or void the permit or entitlement. This requirement is a condition of approval of all such permits and entitlements whether or not expressly set forth in the approval, and may be secured to the satisfaction of the Town Attorney. Page 2 of 26 3. ARCHITECTURE AND SITE APPROVAL REQUIRED. A separate Architecture and Site (A &S) application and approval is required for the new apartment buildings. Architectural details shall be refined as part of this process with input from the Town's Consulting Architect. The Development Review Committee may be the deciding body for the Architecture and Site applications. 4. BELOW MARKET PRICE (BMP) UNITS. The developer shall provide twenty six (26) BMP units within the project. Up to 25 of the BMP units may be located within the existing apartment buildings and shall be rented to low income applicants. A minimum of one BMP unit shall be located within a new building and shall be rented to moderate income applicants. Applicants shall be qualified by the Santa Clara Housing Authority. A deed restriction shall be recorded prior to the issuance of any building permits, stating that the BMP residences must be rented and maintained as below market price units pursuant to the Town's BMP Ordinance and requirements. The developer shall enter into a Below Market Price Agreement with the Town prior to issuance of building permits. 5. BMP PHASING. The applicant shall submit a Marketing and BMP Management Plan for approval by the Director of Community Development and the Town Attorney prior to issuance of building permits. The final certificate of occupancy for the last new apartment building shall not be issued until the 25 BMP units have been designated and occupied by qualified tenants. 6. FINAL LANDSCAPE PLAN. A final landscape plan shall be reviewed by the Town's Consulting Landscape Architect and approved as part of the Architecture and Site process. Minimum tree size at time of planting shall be 24 -inch box. 7. WATER CONSERVATION ORDINANCE REQUIREMENT. The proposed landscaping shall meet the Town of Los Gatos Water Conservation Ordinance. A review fee based on the current fee schedule adopted by the Town Council is required when working landscape and irrigation plans are submitted for review prior to the issuance of a building permit. 8. SETBACKS. The minimum setbacks are those specified by the RM zoning district or as otherwise shown on the Conceptual Development Plans. 9. BUILDING HEIGHT. The maximum height of the new apartment buildings shall be 35 feet. 10. PARKING. A minimum of 261 parking spaces shall be provided and maintained. Parking spaces shall be double - striped per Town standards. Page 3 of 26 11. OUTDOOR LIGHTING. All exterior building and outdoor lighting shall be sluelded and directed away from neighboring properties and Los Gatos Creek, to shine on the project site only.. Lighting shall be the minimum needed for pedestrian safety and security. Lighting specifications, including a photometrics plan for parking lot lighting, shall be reviewed as part of the Architecture and Site process. 12. TRASH ENCLOSURES. Two on -site trash enclosures shall be provided. Trash enclosures shall comply with C -3 requirements. 13. *BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES MITIGATION MEASURE -1. No new construction or the removal of any native vegetation shall be permitted beyond the existing chain -link fence. 14. *BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES MITIGATION MEASURE -2. Removal of native trees within the riparian zone shall be minimized. 15. *BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES MITIGATION MEASURE -3. Construction of new impervious surfaces within the riparian zone shall be reduced as much as is feasible. 16. *BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES MITIGATION MEASURE -4. Best Management Practices (BMPs) to pre -treat storm runoff from the project prior to release into Los Gatos Creek shall be incorporated into the project design. 17. *BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES MITIGATION MEASURE -5. BMPs shall be implemented during construction to prevent creek bank erosion and the release of any contaminants into Los Gatos Creek. 18. *BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES MITIGATION MEASURE -6. Based on the recorded size of Tree #118 (western sycamore, spread = 50'), six 24 -inch box trees shall be planted. Replacement trees shall be planted on the subject property. As an alternative, permission maybe sought from the Santa Clara Valley Flood Control District to plant replacement trees off site in the Los Gatos Creek channel. If replacement trees cannot be reasonably placed on the subj ect property or on the banks of the creek channel, the value of the trees to be removed shall be paid to the Town Tree Fund to add or replace trees elsewhere in Town. 19. *BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES MITIGATION MEASURE -7. As additional compensation for construction within the riparian zone, the following measures shall be incorporated into the project design: a. An invasive species eradication program shall be implemented for the segment of Los Gatos Creek in line with the upstream and downstream property boundaries. Page 4 of 26 f _ b. A qualified Restorationist shall be retained at the applicant's expense to survey the creek segment to identify invasive species to be eradicated. A qualified contractor shall be hired at the applicant's expense to implement the Restorationist's recommendations. It is anticipated that the effort will target giant reed, eucalyptus, privet, Himalayan blackberry, smilo grass, and sweet fennel, or any other possible species identified by the Restorationist. C. The Restorationist shall provide guidance to the contractor regarding appropriate eradication techniques. d. Upon completion of work, the Restorationist shall conduct an inspection and submit a report to the Director of Community Development. If the contractor's work was incomplete or unsatisfactory, contractor shall continue his/her work until the Restorationist signs off. e. The Restorationist shall conduct an annual inspection of the creek section for a period not less than five years. If significant recolonization by invasive species is identified, the applicant shall be responsible for implementing further eradication efforts. f. At the end of five years, if the applicant's efforts have been satisfactory as reported by the Restorationist, the applicant's obligations shall be deemed complete. If the applicant's efforts are deemed unsatisfactory by the Town, the invasive species eradication program shall be continued for an additional five years. 20. *BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES MITIGATION MEASURE -8. All recommendations of the Town's Consulting Arborist shall be implemented to eliminate or minimize the construction- related impacts on the trees to be retained. Refer to the report prepared by Arbor Resources dated May 7, 2010 for details. 21. TREE REMOVAL PERMIT. A Tree Removal Permit shall be obtained for trees approved for removal prior to the issuance of demolition permits. 22. REPLACEMENT TREES. New trees shall be planted to mitigate the loss of trees being removed. The number of trees shall be determined using the canopy replacement table in the Tree Protection Ordinance. New trees shall be double staked and shall be planted prior to final and issuance of occupancy permits. Page 5 of 26 23. TREE FENCING. Protective tree fencing shall be placed at the drip line of existing trees and shall remain through all phases of construction. Fencing shall be six foot high cyclone attached to two -inch diameter steel posts drive 18 inches into the ground and spaced no further than 10 feet apart. Include a tree protection fencing plan with the construction plans. 24. RECYCLING. All wood, metal, glass and aluminum materials generated from demolition work shall be deposited to a company which will recycle the materials. Receipts from the company(s) accepting these materials, noting type and weight of material, shall be submitted to the Town prior to the demolition inspection. 25. FINAL UTILITY LOCATIONS. The applicant shall submit plans showing the final locations and screening of all exterior utilities, including but not limited to, backflow preventers, Fire Department connections, transformers, utility boxes and utility meters. Utility devices shall be screened to the satisfaction of the Director of Community Development. The plans shall be submitted for review and approval prior to issuance of building permits for new construction. 26. *CULTURAL RESOURCES MITGATION MEASURE -1. An archaeological monitor shall be present to observe all construction activities where disturbance of surface soils will occur (e.g. demolition, grading and trenching operations). 27. *CULTURAL RESOURCES MITGATION MEASURE -2. Construction personnel involved with earthmoving shall be alerted to the potential for discovery of prehistoric materials and in particular, concentration of historic artifacts. Prehistoric archaeological resources could include but not be limited to, concentrations of stone, bone or fresh water shellfish, artifacts of these materials, and evidence of fire (ash, charcoal, fire altered earth or rock) and human and animal burials. 28. *CULTURAL RESOURCES MITGATION MEASURE -3. In the event that archaeological traces are encountered, all construction within a 20 -foot radius of the find shall be halted, the Community Development Director shall be notified, and an archaeologist shall be retained to examine the find and make appropriate recommendations. 29. *CULTURAL RESOURCES MITGATION MEASURE -4. In the event that it appears further earthmoving will affect a resource eligible for the California Register of Historic Resource (CRHR), a plan for evaluation of the resource through limited hand excavation shall be submitted to the Town's Community Development Department for approval. If Page 6 of 26 evaluative testing demonstrates that the project will affect a CRHR eligible resource, a plan for the mitigation of impacts to the resource shall be submitted to the Community Development Department for approval before construction is allowed inside the zone designated as archaeologically sensitive. 30. *CULTURAL RESOURCES MITGATION MEASURE -5. Ifthe Community Development Director finds that the archaeological find is not a significant resource, work may resume only after the submittal of a preliminary archaeological report and after provisions for reburial and ongoing monitoring are accepted. Provisions for identifying descendants of a deceased Native American and for reburial shall follow the protocol set forth in CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5(e). If the site is found to be a significant archaeological site, a mitigation program shall be prepared and submitted to the Community Development Director for consideration and approval, in conformance with the protocol set forth in Public Resources Code Section 21083.2. 31. *CULTURAL RESOURCES MITGATION MEASURE -6. A final report shall be prepared when a find is determined to be a significant archaeological site, and /or when Native American remains are found on the site. The final report will include background information on the completed work, a description and list of identified resources, the disposition and curation of these resources, any testing, other recovered information, and conclusions. Building Division 32. PERMITS REQUIRED. A Demolition Permit shall be required for any demolition work necessary for the project and a Building Permit for construction of each of the four new apartment buildings. Separate permits are required for electrical, mechanical, and plumbing work as necessary. 33. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL. The Conditions of Approval must be blue -lined in full on the cover sheet of the construction plans. A Compliance Memorandum shall be prepared and submitted with the building permit application detailing how the Conditions of Approval will be addressed. 34. SIZE OF PLANS. Submit four sets of construction plans, maximum size 24" x 36 ". Page 7 of 26 35, DEMOLITION REQUIREMENTS. Obtain a Building Department Demolition Application and a Bay Area Air Quality Management Application from the Building Department Service Counter. Once the demolition form has been completed, all signatures obtained, and written verification from PG &E that all utilities have been disconnected, return the completed form to the Building Department Service Counter with the J# Certificate, PG &E verification, and three (3) sets of site plans to include all existing structures, existing utility service lines such as water, sewer, and PG &E. No demolition work shall be done without first obtaining a permit from the Town. 36. STREET NAMES & APARTMENT NUMBERS: Submit requests for new street names and apartment numbers to the Building Division prior to submitting for the building permit application process. 37. SOILS REPORT. A soils report, prepared to the satisfaction of the Building Official, containing foundation and retaining wall design recommendations, shall be submitted with the building permit application. This report shall be prepared by a licensed civil engineer specializing in soils mechanics. 38. SHORING. Shoring plans and calculations will be required for all excavations which exceed four (4) feet in depth or which remove lateral support from any existing building, adjacent property or the public right -of -way. Shoring plans and calculations shall be prepared by a California licensed engineer and shall conform to the Cal /OSHA regulations. 39. FOUNDATION INSPECTIONS. A pad certificate prepared by a licensed civil engineer or land surveyor shall be submitted to the project building inspector at foundation inspection. This certificate shall certify compliance with the recommendations as specified in the soils report and that the building pad elevation, on -site retaining wall locations, and elevations have been prepared according to approved plans. Horizontal and vertical controls shall be set and certified by a licensed surveyor or registered civil engineer for the following items: a. Building pad elevation b. Finish floor elevation C. Foundation corner locations d. Retaining Walls 40. RESIDENTIAL TOWN ACCESSIBILITY STANDARDS. The residences shall be designed with adaptability features for multiple family residences per Town Resolution 1994 -61: Page 8. of 26 a. Wood backing (2" x 8" minimum) shall be provided in all bathroom walls, at water closets, showers, and bathtubs located 34- inches from the floor to the center of the backing, suitable for the installation of grab bars. b. All passage doors shall be at least 32- inches wide on the accessible floor. C. Primary entrance shall a 36 -inch wide door including a 5'x5' level landing, no more than 1/2 -inch out of plane with the immediate interior floor level with an 18 -inch clearance at interior strike edge. d. Door buzzer, bell or chime shall be hard wired at primary entrance. 41. TITLE 24 ENERGY COMPLIANCE. All required California Title 24 Energy Compliance Forms must be blue -lined on the plans. 42. TITLE 24 ACCESSIBILITY. On -site parking facilities shall comply with the latest California Title 24 Accessibility Standards. Work shall include, but not be limited to, on -site general path of travel accessibility to building entrances from parking facilities and sidewalks 43. BACKWATER VALVE. The scope of this project may require the installation of a sanitary sewer backwater valve per Town Ordinance 6.50.025. Please provide information on the plans if a backwater valve is required and the location of the installation. The Town of Los Gatos Ordinance and West Valley Sanitation District (WVSD) requires backwater valves on drainage piping serving fixtures that have flood level rims less than 12- inches above the elevation of the next upstream manhole. 44. SPECIAL INSPECTIONS. When a special inspection is required by CBC Section 1704, the architect or engineer of record shall prepare an inspection program that shall be submitted to the Building Official for approval prior to issuance of the building permit. The Town Special Inspection form must be completely filled -out and signed by all requested parties prior to permit issuance. Special Inspection forms are available from the Building Division Service Counter or online at www.losgatosca.gov /building. 45. BLUEPRINT FOR CLEAN BAY. The Town standard Santa Clara County ValleyNonpoint Source Pollution Control Program Sheet (24x36) shall be part of the plan submittal as the second page. The specification sheet is available at the Building Division Service Counter for a fee of $2 or at San Jose Blue Print for a fee or online at www.losgatosca.gov/building. 46. PLANS. The construction plans shall be prepared under the direct supervision of a licensed architect or engineer. (Business and Professionals Code Section 5538). Page 9 of 26 47. APPROVALS REQUIRED: The project requires the following departments and agencies approval before issuing a building permit: a. Community Development — Planning Division: Suzanne Davis at (408) 354 -6875 b. Engineering/Parks & Public Works Dept.: Trang Tu- Nguyen at (408) 3545236 C. Santa Clara County Fire Department: (408) 378 -4010 d. West Valley Sanitation District: (408) 378 -2407 e. Local School District: The Town will forward the paperwork to the appropriate school district(s) for processing. A copy of the paid receipt is required prior to permit issuance. f. Bay Area Air Quality Management District: (415) 771 -6000 48. HOUSING ACCESSIBILITY. The project shall comply with the Housing Accessibility requirements of 2007 California Building Code Chapter 11A. 49. *NOISE MITGATION MEASURE -1. To minimize construction noise impacts on existing apartments located adjacent to the site, existing boundary fencing shall be retained throughout the noisier earthmoving phase of construction or any new fencing proposed to be constructed along site boundaries shall be constructed as early as possible (prior to project grading activities if feasible). To maximize the fence's noise attenuation effects, proposed fencing shall be solid with no gaps, cracks, or openings (e.g. high quality air -tight tongue - and- groove, board and batten, or shiplap design). 50. *NOISE MITGATION MEASURE -2. To minimize construction noise impacts on existing Riviera Terrace apartments located adjacent to proposed Building 4, the western- facing fagade of this building shall be enclosed as early in the construction process as possible to minimize impacts on the existing apartments to the west. 51. *NOISE MITGATION MEASURE -3. To achieve acceptable exterior noise levels on affected balconies, the.following design requirements shall be implemented: a. To achieve compliance with the State's 65 -dB (DNL) exterior noise guideline, 42- inch high acoustically - effective railings shall be constructed on the balconies of second and third floor units in Building 3 and the balconies of second and third floor balconies of the two units in each stack of Building . 4 within 320 feet of the freeway centerline (those that have a direct or side view of the Highway 17 freeway). The balcony railing height is in reference to the nearest balcony floor elevation. Page 10 of 26 b. Balcony railing shall be constructed air -tight (i.e. without cracks, gaps, or other openings) and must provide for long -term durability, including the balcony floor. The railings can be constructed of masonry, wood, concrete, stucco, metal or a combination thereof, and must have minim surface weight of 1.5 pound per square feet. If wood fencing is used, homogenous sheet materials are preferable to conventional wood fencing as the latter has a tendency to warp and form openings with age. High quality, air -tight tongue- and - groove, board and batten, or shiplap construction can be used, provided that the construction is air -tight and the minimum surface weight is met. Railing details shall be reviewed during the A &S process. C. Translucent materials, such as glass, Lexan, or Plexiglas, maybe incorporated into the barriers to provide for light and views, however, they must have a minimum thickness of 3/16 inches to meet the minimum surface weight requirement. Downspouts and scuppers are preferable over sheet draining. All connections with posts, pilasters, and the building shells must be sealed air- tight. No openings are permitted between the upper railing components and the balcony floor. 52. *NOISE MITGATION MEASURE -4. To achieve compliance with the Town of Los Gatos Noise Element and Title 24 interior noise standard of 45 dB (DNL), the following measures shall be implemented: a. Building 2: All windows and glass doors of living spaces on the north, east, and south facades of this building (except for the first -floor units on the north side facing the swimming pool area), windows shall be maintained closed at all times. Windows and glass doors shall have a minimum Sound Transmission Class (STC) rating of 27 and some type of mechanical ventilation shall be provided. b. Building 3: All windows and glass doors of living spaces on the north, east, and south facades of this building shall be maintained closed at all times. Windows and glass doors shall have a minimum Sound Transmission Class (STC) rating of 27 and some type of mechanical ventilation shall be provided. C. Building 4: All windows and glass doors of living spaces on the north, east, and south facades of this building (except for the four westerly first floor units located on the south side facing the swimming pool area, those closest to Building 7) shall be maintained closed at all times. Windows and glass doors shall have a minimum Page 11 of 26 Sound Transmission Class (STC) rating of 27 and some type of mechanical ventilation shall be provided. d. Building 7: Units in this building that will be renovated requiring a permit and compliance with Title 24 shall maintain "closed at all times" windows and glass doors of living spaces on the north, east, and south facades of this building within 550 feet of the centerline of the Highway 17 freeway (four -story portion of building with the exception of the first floor units on the south side facing the swimming pool area). Windows and glass doors shall have a minimum Sound Transmission Class (STC) rating of 27 and some type of mechanical ventilation shall be provided. 53. *NOISE MITGATION MEASURE -5. When windows and doors are maintained closed for noise control, some type of mechanical ventilation to assure a habitable environment must be provided. The mechanical ventilation requirements are specified in the Uniform Building Code (UBC) and described in Appendix B of the ELPA study, which is included as Attachment 6 of the Initial Study. The windows that are specified to be maintained closed are to be operable, as the requirement does not imply a "fixed" condition. All other windows of the project and all bathroom windows may have any type of glazing and may be kept opened as desired unless the bathroom is an integral part of a living space without a closeable door, such as those sometimes found in a master bedroom suite. 54. *NOISE MITGATION MEASURE -6. In addition to the required STC ratings, windows and doors shall be installed in an acoustically- effective manner. To achieve an acoustically - effective window construction, the sliding window panels must form an air -tight seal when in the closed position and the window frames must be caulked to the wall opening around their entire perimeter with the non - hardening caulking compound to prevent sound infiltration. Exterior doors must seal air -tight around the full perimeter when in the closed position and must meet Title 24 requirements for multi - family entry doors (STC 24.). 55. *NOISE MITGATION MEASURE -7. The acoustical test report of all sound -rated windows and doors should be reviewed by a qualified acoustician to ensure that the chosen windows and doors will be adequately reduce traffic noise to acceptable levels. Many dual -pane windows and glass door assemblies have inherent noise reduction problems in the traffic noise frequency spectrum due to resonance that occurs within the air space between the window lites, and the noise reduction capabilities vary from manufacturer to manufacturer. Page 12 of 26 56. *AIR QUALITY MITIGATION MEASURE -1. To limit the project's construction- related dust, criteria pollutant, and precursor emissions, the following BAAQMD -recommended Basic Construction Mitigation Measures shall be implemented: a. All exposed surfaces (e.g. parking areas, staging areas, soil piles, graded areas, and unpaved access roads) shall be watered two times per day. b. All haul trucks transporting soil, sand, or other loose material off -site shall be covered. C. All visible mud or dirt track -out onto adjacent public roads shall be removed using wet power vacuum street sweepers at least once per day. The use of dry power sweeping is prohibited. d. All vehicle speeds on unpaved roads shall be limited to 15 mph. e. All roadways, driveways, and sidewalks to be paved shall be completed as soon as possible. Building pads shall be laid as soon as possible after grading unless seeding or soil binders are used. f. Idling times shall be minimized either by shutting equipment off when not in use or reducing the maximum idling time to 5 minutes (as required by the California airborne toxics control measure Title 13, Section 2485 of California Code of Regulations). Clear signage shall be provided for construction workers at all access points. g. All construction equipment shall be maintained and properly tuned in accordance with manufacturer's specifications. All equipment shall be checked by a certified mechanic and determined to be running in proper condition prior to operation. h. A publicly visible sign with the telephone number and person to contact at the Lead Agency regarding dust complaints shall be posted at the site. This person shall respond and take corrective action within 48 hours. The Air District's phone number shall also be visible to ensure compliance with applicable regulations. TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE DIRECTOR OF PARKS & PUBLIC WORKS: Engineering Division 57. *GEOLOGY AND SOILS MITIGATION MEASURE. The recommendations in the geotechnical report by Cornerstone Earth Group (dated May 12, 2010) shall be implemented. Page 13 of 26 The project Geotechnical Consultant shall submit a plan review letter confirming that all recommendations have been incorporated into the construction plans, prior to issuance of a grading permit. 58. GENERAL. All public improvements shall be made according to the latest adopted Town Standard Drawings and the Town Standard Specifications. All work shall conform to the applicable Town ordinances. The adjacent public right -of -way shall be kept clear of all job related dirt and debris at the end of the day. Dirt and debris shall not be washed into storm drainage facilities. The storing of goods and materials on the sidewalk and /or the street will not be allowed unless a special permit is issued. The developer's representative in charge shall beat the job site during all working. hours. Failure to maintain the public right -of -way according to this condition may result in the Town performing the required maintenance at the developer's expense. 59. ENCROACHMENT PERMIT. All work in the public right -of -way will require a Construction Encroachment Permit. All work over $5,000 will require construction security: 60. PUBLIC WORKS INSPECTIONS. The developer or his representative shall notify the Engineering Inspector at least twenty -four (24) hours before starting any work pertaining to on -site drainage facilities, grading or paving, and all work in the Town's right -of -way. Failure to do so will result in rejection of work that went on without inspection. 61. WEST VALLEY SANITATION DISTRICT. All sewer connection and treatment plant capacity fees shall be paid and written confirmation of payment of these fees shall be provided to the Town prior to any permit issuance. 62. PRIVATE EASEMENTS. Agreements detailing rights, limitations, and responsibilities of involved parties shall accompany each private easement (if required). The easements and associated agreements shall be recorded prior to any permits. 63. SITE SUPERVISION. The General Contractor shall provide qualified supervision on the job site at all times during construction. 64. TREE REMOVAL. Copies of all necessary tree removal permits shall be provided prior to issuance of a grading permit. 65. GRADING PERMIT. A grading permit is required for site grading and drainage. The grading permit application (with grading plans) shall be made to the Engineering Division of the Parks & Public Works Department located at 41 Miles Avenue. The grading plans shall Page 14 of 26 include final grading, drainage, retaining wall location, driveway, utilities and interim erosion control. Grading plans shall list earthwork quantities and a table of existing and proposed impervious areas. Unless specifically allowed by the Director of Parks and Public Works, the grading permit will be issued concurrently with the building permit. The grading permit is for work outside the building footprint(s). A separate building permit, issued by the Building Department on E. Main Street is needed for grading within the building footprint. 66. SURVEYING CONTROLS. Horizontal and vertical controls shall be set and certified by a licensed surveyor or registered civil engineer qualified to practice land surveying, for the following items: a. Retaining wall - -top of wall elevations and locations b. Toe and top of cut and fill slopes 67. SIDEWALK CLOSURE. Any proposed blockage or partial closure of the sidewalk requires an encroachment permit. Special provisions such as limitations on works hours, protective enclosures, or other means to facilitate public access in a safe manner may be required. 68. PAD CERTIFICATION. A letter from a licensed land surveyor shall be provided stating that the building foundation was constructed in accordance with the approved plans shall be provided subsequent to foundation construction and prior to construction on the structure. The pad certification shall address both vertical and horizontal foundation placement. 69. PLAN CHECK FEES. Plan check fees shall be deposited with the Town prior to plan review at the Engineering Division of the Parks and Public Works Department. 70. INSPECTION FEES. Inspection fees shall be deposited with the Town prior to issuance of any permit or recordation of the Final Map. 71, PRECONSTRUCTION MEETING. Prior to issuance of any permit or the commencement of any site work, the general contractor shall: a. Along with the project applicant, attend. a pre- construction meeting with the Town Engineer to discuss the project conditions of approval, working hours, site maintenance and other construction matters. b. Acknowledge in writing that they have read and understand the project conditions of approval, and will make certain that all project sub - contractors have read and understand them prior to commencing work and that a copy of the project conditions of approval will be posted on site at all times during construction. Page 15 of 26 72. RETAINING WALLS. A building permit, issued by the Building Division of the Community Development Department at 110 E. Main Street, may be required for site retaining walls. Walls are not reviewed or approved by the Engineering Division of Parks and Public Works during the grading permit plan review process. 73. SOILS REPORT. One copy of the soils report shall be submitted with the grading permit application. The soils report shall include specific criteria and standards governing site grading, drainage, pavement design, retaining wall design and erosion control. The reports shall be signed and "wet stamped" by the engineer or geologist, in conformance with Section 6735 of the California Business and Professions Code. 74. SOILS REVIEW. Prior to issuance of any permit, the applicant's soils engineer shall review the final grading and drainage plans to ensure that designs for foundations, retaining walls, site grading, and site drainage are in accordance with their recommendations and the peer review comments. The applicant's soils engineer's approval shall then be conveyed to the Town either by letter or by signing the plans. 75. SOILS ENGINEER CONSTRUCTION OBSERVATION. During construction, all excavations and grading shall be inspected by the applicant's soils engineer prior to placement of concrete and /or backfill so they can verify that the actual conditions are as anticipated in the design -level geotechnical report, and recommend appropriate changes in the recommendations contained in the report, if necessary. The results of the construction observation and testing should be documented in an "as- built" letter /report prepared by the applicants' soils engineer and submitted to the Town before final release of any occupancy permit is granted. 76. DEDICATIONS /EASEMENTS. The following shall be provided and recorded by separate instrument. These shall be recorded before any permits are issued. a. Ingress- egress, emergency access, storm drainage and sanitary sewer easements, as required. 77. FRONTAGE IMPROVEMENTS'. Applicant shall be required to improve the project's public frontage to current Town Standards. These improvements may include but not limited to curb, gutter, sidewalk, driveway approaches, curb ramps, traffic signal, street lighting (upgrade and /or repaint) etc. Page 16 of 26 78. WATER DESIGN. Water plans prepared by SJWC must be reviewed and approved prior to issuance of any permit. 79. DESIGN CHANGES. The Applicant's registered Engineer shall notify the Town Engineer, in writing, at least 72 hours in advance of all differences between the proposed work and the design indicated on the plans. Any proposed changes shall be subj ect to the approval of the Town before altered work is started. Any approved changes shall be incorporated into the final "as- built" drawings. 80. AGENCY REQUIREMENTS. All required permits (Fish & Game, SCVWD, Army Corps, etc) as determined by Environmental Review shall be obtained for proposed improvements in or near riparian areas within their jurisdiction. Copies of all required permits shall be provided to the Parks & Public Works Department before any permits are issued. 81. TOWNE TERRACE/UNIVERSTI Y AVENUE. The developer shall construct a raised pork - chop island at the northeast corner of the intersection with ADA accessible pedestrian path and install pedestrian crosswalk crossing Towne Terrace. These improvements shall be constructed as soon as possible, and prior to occupancy of the first new unit. 82. FAIR SHARE CONTRIBUTION FOR INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENT. The developer shall pay a fair share cost $8,446 toward an identified intersection improvement project, signalization of Lark/University. The amount of cost is estimated with the number of project trips entering the Lark/University intersection based on the application. The cost will be re- calculated from the final plans. The fee shall be paid prior to issuance of building permits. 83. TRAFFIC IMPACT MITIGATION FEE (RESIDENTIAL). The developer shall pay a proportional the project's share of transportation improvements needed to serve cumulative development within the Town of Los Gatos. The fee amount will be based upon the Town Council resolution in effect at the time the building permit is issued. The fee shall be paid before issuance of a building permit. The final fee shall be calculated form the final plans using the rate schedule in effect at the time the building permit is issued. 84. STREET LIGHTING. The developer shall re -paint street light poles and replace existing luminaire fixture with LED luminaire fixture for existing street lights along Towne Terrace, Avery, Rushmore, and Millbrae. 85. PRECONSTRUCTION PAVEMENT SURVEY. Prior to issuance of a Grading Permit, the project Applicant shall complete a pavement condition survey documenting the extent of Page 17 of 26 existing pavement defects using a 35 -mm or digital video camera. The survey shall include the full length of Rushmore Lane, Millbrae Lane, Towne Terrace and University Avenue from Towne Terrace to Hwy 9. The results shall be documented in a report and submitted to the Town for review. 86. POSTCONSTRUCTION PAVEMENT SURVEY. The project Applicant will complete a pavement condition survey to determine whether road damage occurred as a result of project construction. Rehabilitation improvements required to restore the pavement to pre - construction condition and strength will be required. The Applicant shall be responsible for completing any required road repairs prior to release of occupancy permit for the 25 unit. 87. EROSION CONTROL. Interim and final erosion control plans shall be prepared and submitted to the Engineering Division of the Parks & Public Works Department. A Notice of Intent (NOI) and Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) shall be submitted to the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board for projects disturbing more than one acre. A maximum of two weeks is allowed between clearing of an area and stabilizing/building on an area if grading is allowed during the rainy season. Interim erosion control measures, to be carried out during construction and before installation of the final landscaping shall be included. Interim erosion control method shall include, but are not limited to: silt fences, fiber rolls (with locations and details), erosion control blankets, Town standard seeding specification, filter berms, check dams, retention basins, etc. Provide erosion control measures as needed to protect downstream water quality during winter months. The grading, drainage, erosion control plans and SWPPP shall be in compliance with applicable measures contained in the amended provisions C.3 and C.14 of most current Santa Clara County NPDES MRP Permit. 88. DUST CONTROL. Blowing dust shall be reduced by timing construction activities so that paving and building construction begin as soon as possible after completion of grading, and by landscaping disturbed soils as soon as possible. Further, water trucks shall be present and in use at the construction site. All portions of the site subject to blowing dust shall be watered as often as deemed necessary by the Town, or a minimum of three times daily, or apply (non- toxic) soil stabilizers on all unpaved access roads, parking areas, and staging areas at construction sites in order to insure proper control of blowing dust for the duration of the project. Watering on public streets shall not occur. Streets will be cleaned by street Page 18 of 26 sweepers or by hand as often as deemed necessary by the Town Engineer, or at least once a day. Watering associated with on -site construction activity shall take place between the hours of 8 a.m. and 5 p.m. and shall include at least one late- afternoon watering to minimize the effects of blowing dust. All public streets soiled or littered due to this construction activity shall be cleaned and swept on a dailybasis during the workweek to the satisfaction of the Town. Demolition or earthwork activities shall be halted when wind speeds (instantaneous gusts) exceed 25 MPH. All trucks hauling soil, sand, or other loose debris shall be covered. 89. DUST CONTROL (SITES > 4 ACRES). The following measures should be implemented at construction sites greater than four acres in area (should current NPDES Requirements conflict with these provisions the most stringent shall apply): a. Hydroseed or apply (non- toxic) soil stabilizers to inactive construction areas (previously graded areas inactive for ten days or more). b. Enclose, cover, water twice daily or apply (non- toxic) soil binders to exposed stockpiles (dirt, sand, etc.). C. Limit traffic speeds on unpaved roads to 15 mph. d. Install sandbags or other erosion control measures to prevent silt runoff to public roadways. e. Replant vegetation in disturbed areas as quickly as possible. 90. CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT PLAN. The Applicant shall submit a construction management plan that shall incorporate at a minimum the Earth Movement Plan, Traffic Control Plan, Project Schedule, site security fencing, employee parking, construction staging area, construction trailer, and proposed outhouse locations. 91. CONSTRUCTION STREET PARKING. No vehicle having a manufacturer's rated gross vehicle weight exceeding ten thousand (10,000) pounds shall be allowed to park on the portion of a street which abuts property in a residential zone without prior approval from the Town Engineer (§ 15.40.070). 92. SITE DRAINAGE. Rainwater leaders shall be discharged to splash blocks. No through curb drains will be allowed. Any storm drain inlets (public or private) directly connected to public storm system shall be stenciled /signed with appropriate Flows to Bay language. Page 19 of 26 93. STORM WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN. A storm water management shall be included with the grading permit application for all Group 1 and Group 2 projects as defined in the amended provisions C.3 of the amended Santa Clara County NPDES Permit. The plan shall delineate source control measures and BMP's together with the sizing calculations. The plan shall be certified by a professional pre- qualified by the Town. In the event that storm water measures proposed on the Planning approval differ significantly from those certified on the Building/Grading Permit, the Town may require a modification of the Planning approval prior to release of the Building Permit. The applicant may elect to have the Planning submittal certified to avoid this possibility. 94. AGREEMENT FOR STORMWATER BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE OBLIGATIONS. The property owner/homeowner's association shall enter into an agreement with the Town for maintenance of the stormwater filtration devices required to be installed on this project by Town's Stormwater Discharge Permit and all current amendments or modifications. The agreement will specify that certain routine maintenance shall be performed by the property owner/homeowner's association and will specify device maintenance reporting requirements. The agreement will also specify routine inspection requirements, permits and payment of fees. The agreement shall be recorded prior to release of any occupancy permits. 95. SILT AND MUD IN PUBLIC RIGHT -OF -WAY. It is the responsibility of contractor and home owner to make sure that all dirt tracked into the public right -of -way is cleaned up on a daily basis. Mud, silt, concrete and other construction debris SHALL NOT be washed into the Town's storm drains. 96. UTILITIES. The developer shall install all new, relocated, or temporarily removed utility services, including telephone, electric power and all other communications lines underground, as required by Town Code §27.50.015(b). All new utility services shall be placed underground. Underground conduit shall be provided for cable television service. Applicant is required to obtain approval of all proposed utility alignments from any and all utility service providers. The Town of Los Gatos does not approve or imply approval for final alignment or design of these facilities. Page 20 of 26 97. RESTORATION OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS. The developer shall repair or replace all existing improvements not designated for removal that are damaged or removed because of developer's operations. Improvements such as, but not limited to: curbs, gutters, sidewalks, driveways, signs, pavements, raised pavement markers, thermoplastic pavement markings, etc. shall be repaired and replaced to a condition equal to or better than the original condition. Existing improvement to be repaired or replaced shall be at the direction of the Engineering Construction Inspector, and shall comply with all Title 24 Disabled Access provisions. Developer shall request a walk - through with the Engineering Construction Inspector before the start of construction to verify existing conditions. 98. SIDEWALK REPAIR. The developer shall repair and replace to existing Town standards any public sidewalk damaged now or during construction of this project. Sidewalk repair shall match existing color, texture and design, and shall be constructed per Town Standard Details. The limits of sidewalk repair will be determined by the Engineering Construction Inspector during the construction phase of the project. 99. CURB AND GUTTER. The developer shall repair and replace to existing Town standards any public curb and gutter damaged now or during construction of this project. New curb and gutter shall be constructed per Town Standard Details. The limits of curb and gutter repair will be determined by Engineering Construction Inspector during the construction phase of the project. 100. DRIVEWAY APPROACH. The developer shall install 2 Town standard commercial driveway approach(es). The new driveway approach shall be constructed per Town Standard Details. 101. CURB RAMPS. The developer shall construct any proposed curb ramps in compliance with ADA Standards. 102. FENCING. Any fencing proposed within 200 -feet of an intersection shall comply with Town Code Section §23.10.080. 103. AS -BUILT PLANS. After completion of construction of all work, the original plans shall have all changes clearly marked. The "as- built" plans shall again be signed and "wet - stamped" by the civil engineer who prepared the plans, attesting to the changes. The original "as- built" plans shall be reviewed and approved the Engineering Inspector. A Mylar and AutoCAD disk of the approved "as- built" plans shall be provided to the Town before the Page 21 of 26 Faithful Performance Security or Occupancy Permit is released. The AutoCAD file shall include only the following information and shall conform to the layer naming convention: a) Building Outline, Layer: BLDG - OUTLINE; b) Driveway, Layer: DRIVEWAY; c) Retaining Wall, Layer: RETAINING WALL; d) Swimming Pool, Layer: SWIMMING -POOL; e) Tennis Court, Layer: TENNIS - COURT; D Property Line, Layer: PROPERTY -LINE; g) Contours, Layer: NEWCONTOUR. All as -built digital files must be on the same coordinate basis as the Town's survey control network and shall be submitted in AutoCAD version 2000 or higher. 104. SANITARY SEWER LATERAL. Sanitary sewer laterals are televised by West Valley Sanitation District and approved by the Town of Los Gatos before they are used or reused. Install a sanitary sewer lateral clean -out at the property line. 105. SANITARY SEWER BACKWATER VALVE. Drainage piping serving fixtures which have flood level rims less than twelve (12) inches (304.8 mm) above the elevation of the next upstream manhole and /or flushing inlet cover at the public or private sewer system serving such drainage piping shall be protected from backflow of sewage by installing an approved type backwater valve. Fixtures above such elevation shall not discharge through the backwater valve, unless first approved by the Administrative (See. 6.50.025). The Town shall not incur any liability or responsibility for damage resulting from a sewer overflow where the property owner or other person has failed to install a backwater valve, as defined section 103(e) of the Uniform Plumbing Code adopted by section 6.50.010 of the Town Code and maintain such device in a functional operating condition. Evidence of West Valley Sanitation District's decision on whether a backwater device is needed shall be provided prior to issuance of a building permit. 106. CONSTRUCTION NOISE. Between the hours of 8:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m., weekdays and 9:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. weekends and holidays, construction, alteration or repair activities shall be allowed. No individual piece of equipment shall produce a noise level exceeding eighty -five (85) dBA at twenty -five (25) feet: If the device is located within a structure on the property, the measurement shall be made at distances as close to twenty -five (25) feet from the device as possible. The noise level at any point outside of the property plane shall not exceed eighty -five (85) dBA. Page 22 of 26 107. NEIGHBORHOOD CONSTRUCTION COMMUNICATION PLAN: The applicant shall initiate a weekly neighborhood (including all existing tenants of existing development and adjacent parcels) e -mail notification program to provide project status updates. The e -mail notices will also be posted on a bulletin board placed in a prominent location along the project perimeter. 108. GOOD HOUSEKEEPING. Good housekeeping practices shall be observed at all times during the course of construction. Superintendence of construction shall be diligently performed by aperson or persons authorized to do so at all times during working hours. The storing of goods and /or materials on the sidewalk and /or the street will not be allowed unless a special permit is issued by the Engineering Division. The adjacent public right -of -way shall be kept clear of all job related dirt and debris at the end of the day. Dirt and debris shall not be washed into storm drainage facilities. The storing of goods and materials on the sidewalk and /or the street will not be allowed unless a special permit is issued. The developer's representative in charge shall beat the job site during all working hours. Failure to maintain the public right -of -way according to this condition may result in the Town performing the required maintenance at the developer's expense. 109. TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN. The project sponsor will be required to work with the Engineering Division of the Parks and Public Works Department to develop a traffic control plan for incorporation into the construction bid documents (specifications), and this plan will include, but not be limited to, the following measures: a. Construction activities shall be strategically timed and coordinated to minimize traffic disruption for schools, residents, businesses, and special events. The schools located on the haul route shall be contacted to help with the coordination of the trucking operation to minimize traffic disruption. b. Flag persons shall be placed at locations necessary to control one -way traffic flow. All flag persons shall have the capability of communicating with each other to coordinate the operation. C. Prior to construction, advance notification of all affected residents and emergency services shall be made regarding one -way operation, specifying dates and hours of operation. Page 23 of 26 110. HAULING OF SOIL. Hauling of soil on or off -site shall not occur during the morning or evening peak periods (between 7:00 a.m. and 9:00 a.m. and between 4:00 p.m. and 6:00 p.m.). Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the developer shall work with the Town Building and Engineering Department Engineering Inspectors to devise a traffic control plan to ensure safe and efficient traffic flow under periods when soil is hauled on or off the project site. This may include, but is not limited to provisions for the developer /owner to place construction notification signs noting the dates and time of construction and hauling activities, or providing additional traffic control. Cover all trucks hauling soil, sand, and other loose debris or require all trucks to maintain at least two feet of freeboard. TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE SANTA CLARA COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT: 111. AUTOMATIC FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM. Approved automatic fire sprinklers are required for all new and modified buildings larger than 3,600 square feet or that are more than three or more stories in height. A State of California licensed (C -16) fire protection contractor shall submit plans, calculations a completed permit application and appropriate fees to the Fire Department for review and approval, prior to beginning work. 112. TIMING OF ROADWAY INSTALLATIONS. Required access roads. Up through the first lift of asphalt, shall be installed and accepted by the Fire Department prior to the start of combustible construction. During construction, emergency access roads shall be maintained clear and unimpeded. Building permit issuance may be held up until installations are completed. Temporary access roads may be approved on a case by case basis. 113. POTABLE WATER. Potable water supplies shall be protected from contamination caused by fire protection water supplies. The applicant shall contact the providing water purveyor and shall comply with all requirements of that purveyor. The fire sprinkler system shall be designed in compliance with water purveyor requirements; final approval of the system will not be granted by the Fire Department until written confirmation is received from the water purveyor. 114 GROUND - LADDER RESCUE. Ground - ladder rescue from second and third floor rooms shall be made possible for Fire Department operations. With the climbing angle of seventy five degrees maintained, a seven foot clear walkway shall be provided along either side of the building. Landscaping shall not interfere with the required access. Page 24 of 26 115. FIRE APPARATUS (LADDER TRUCK) ACCESS ROADS. Provide access roadways with a paved all weather surface and a minimum unobstructed width of 30 feet, vertical clearance of 13 feet 6 inches, minimum circulating turning radius of 45 feet outside and 31 feet inside, a maximum slope of 10% and vehicle loading of 75,000 pounds. 116. FIRE DEPARTMENT (ENGINE) ROADWAY TURNAROUND. Provide an approved Fire Department engine roadway turnaround with a minimum radius of 45 feet outside and 31 feet inside. Installations shall conform with Fire Department Standard Details and Specification sheet A -1. 117. PREMISE IDENTIFICATION. Approved numbers or addresses shall be placed on all new and buildings in such a position as to be plainly visible and legible from the street or road fronting the property. Numbers shall contrast with their background. Page 25 of 26 SECTION VI This Ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the Town Council of the Town of Los Gatos on , 2011, and adopted by the following vote as an ordinance of the Town of Los Gatos at a meeting of the Town Council of the Town of Los Gatos on , 2011 and becomes effective 30 days after it is adopted. COUNCIL MEMBERS: AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: SIGNED: MAYOR OF THE TOWN OF LOS GATOS LOS GATOS, CALIFORNIA ATTEST: CLERK ADMINISTRATOR OF THE TOWN OF LOS GATOS LOS GATOS, CALIFORNIA. N:\DEV\ORDS \RWMRATERRACE- PC,DOC Page 26 of 26 Forwarded by Planning Commission Date: Approved by Town Council Date: Ord: Clerk Administrator Mayor EXHIBIT A This Page Intentionally Left Blank