2004-040- Town Manager/Executive Director To Apply For Transportation Development Act (TDA) Article 3 FundingRESOLUTION :2004 - 41
RESOLUTION OF THE TOWN COUNCIL/REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
OF THE'TOWN OF LOS GATOS
AUTHORIZING TOWN MANAGER/EXECUTNE DIRECTOR TO APPLY FOR
TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT ACT (TDA) ARTICLE 3 FUNDING
WHEREAS, Article 3 of the Transportation Development Act (TDA), Public Utilities Code
(PLJC) Section 99200 et sec .., authorizes the submission of claims to a regional transportation
planning agency for the funding of projects exclusively for the benefit and/or use of pedestrians and
bicyclists; and
WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC), as the regional
transportation planning agency for the San Francisco Bay region, has adopted MTC Resolution No.
875, Revised, entitled "Transportation Development Act, Article 3, Pedestrian/Bicycle Projects,"
which delineates procedures :and criteria for submission of requests for the allocation of "TDA
Article 3" funding; and
WHEREAS, MTC Resolution No. 875, Revised requires that requests for the allocation of
TDA Article 3 funding be submitted as part of a single, countywide coordinated claim from each
county in the San Francisco Bay region,; and
WHEREAS, the Town of Los Gatos desires to submit a request to MTC for the allocation
of TDA Article 3 funds to support the projects described in Attachment B to this resolution, which
are for the exclusive benefit and/or use of pedestrians and/or bicyclists; now., therefore, be it.
RESOLVED, that The Town Of Los Gatos declares it is eligible to request an allocation of
TDA Article 3 funds pursuant to Section 99234 of the Public Utilities Code, and furthermore, be it.
RESOLVED, that there is no pending or threatened litigation that might adversely affect the
project or projects described in Attachment B to this resolution, or that might impair the ability of
the Town of Los Gatos to carry out the project; and furthermore, be it.
RESOLVED,. that the Town of Los Gatos attests to the accuracy of and approves the
statements in Attachment A to this resolution; and furthermore, be it.
RESOLVED, that a certified copy of this resolution and its attachments, and any
accompanying supporting materials shall be forwarded to the congestion management agency,
countywide transportation planning agency, or county association of governments,, as the case may
be, of the Santa Clara County Valley'Transportation Authority for submission to MTC as part of the
countywide coordnated'TDA Article 3 claim.
.PASSED .AND ADOPTED at a meeting of the Town Council/Redevelopment Agency
of the Town of Los Gatos, California, held on the 5'`" day of April, 2004 by the following votes:
COUNCIL/AGENCY MEMBERS::
AYES: Sandy Decker, Diane McNutt, Joe Przynski, Mike Wasserman,
.Mayor :Steve Glickman.
NAYS : None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: .None ~ ,
SIGNED:
MAYOR OF'THE TOWN OF LOS GATOS/
CHAIR OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
LOS GATOS, CALIFORNIA
ATTEST.:
CLERK/SECRITARY OF'THE O N LOS GATOS
OF THE TOWN OF LOS GATOS
LOS GATOS; CALIFORNIA
APPLI ~TION DOCUMENTS: TDA ARTICLE 3 {2004/05)
BICYCLE/PEDESTRIAN PROJECT
Applicant: Town of Los Gatos
County: Santa Clara
Name of Project: La Rinconada Park Trail Restoration
Contact Person: Jessy Pu
Telephone: (408) 395-2859
Email; jpu@ os atosca.gov
Amount ofClaim: $ 35.000.00
Type and extent of project (check and complete requested information
Bike Path (Class I) ^ {length)
Bike Path (Class II) ^ (length)
Bicycle Route (Class III) ^ {length)
Bicycle Parking Facilities ^ (num./type)
Other Bicycle Facilities ^ .(type)
Bicycle Safety Education ^
Pedestrian Walkway
s (length)
Other Pedestrian Facilitie 100' (Primarily a pedestrian trail, bicycles permitted)
Project Description: .Restore failine creek. slotie and repave trail
Financial Plan: Below, please list project components being applied for such as planning, engineering right of way,
construction, contingencies, etc.:; also provide project budget showing total cost of project and other funding sources. If
this is a segment of a larger project, include prior and proposed funding sources for other segments.
Project Components: Desien Engineerine and Construction
Funding Prior Year Application
Year 2" Year 3r Year Total Cost
TDA ' $35,000.00
Other (s ecif
Total $35,000:00
1. Project Eligibility (If no, give approximate date of completion in comments) YE5 NO
A. Is the ,project approved by the governing agency {City Council or Board of Supervisors)?~ ^
B. If a bikeway, does the project meet Caltrans mandatory minimum safety design criteria? ^ ^ ,11/~/~
C. If a bicycle project, has it been reviewed by aBicycle Advisory Committee? ^ ^ N//a
(If not, please explain below under "Comments")
D. .Has the environmental impact documentation been completed?
{See Tab 1, MTC's Fund Application Manual) Specify date completed below. ^ ^
EIR
Negative Declaration
Notice of Exemption T
E. Expected completion date of project? Within 6 months .from funding authorization
1. Right-of-way purchased ^ ^ ~~A
2. Agreement ofall cities and other agencies involved ^
3. Commitment of other necessary funds ~ ~ N`A
4. Preliminary design completed
5. Final cost estimate/Financial .plan completed ^
F. Provisions have been made to maintain .the facility by claimantj~ or other
Attachment
Resolution
Re: Reauest to the Metropolitan Transportation Commission for the Allocation of Fiscal
Year 2004-OS Transportation Development Act Article 3 Pedestrian/Bicvcle
Project Funding '-
Findings
page 1 of 1
1. That the Town of Los Gatos is .not legally impeded from submitting a request to the
Metropolitan Transportation Commission for the allocation of Transportation
Development .Act (TDA) Article 3 funds, nor is the Town of Los Gatos legally
impeded from undertaking the project(s) described in "Attachment B" of this
resolution.
2, That the Town of :Los Gatos has committed adequate staffing resources to complete
the project(s) described on Attachment B.
3. A review of the project(s) described in Attachment B has resulted in the consideration
of all pertinent matters, .including those related to environmental and right-of--way
permits and clearances, attendant to the successful completion of the project(s).
4. Issues attendant to securing environmental and right-of--way permits and clearances
for the projects described in Attachment B have been reviewed and will be concluded
in a manner and on a schedule that will not jeopardize the deadline for the use of the
TDA funds being requested.
5, That the project(s) described in Attachment B comply with the requirements of the
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA, Public .Resources Code Sections
21000 et seq.),. and that the Town of Los Gatos is in possession of the document(s)
supporting such compliance, said document(s) having been made available to for
public .review and stamped by the County Clerk or County Recorder of the county in
which the claimant is located.
6. That as portrayed in the budgetary description(s) of the project(s) in Attachment B,
the sources of funding other than TDA are assured and adequate for completion of the
project(s).
7. That the project(s) described in Attachment B are for capital construction and design
engineering.
9. That any project described in Attachment B that is a "Class I Bikeway," meets the
mandatory minimum safety design criteria published in Chapter 1000 of the
California Highway Design Manual.
10. That the project(s) described in Attachment B are ready to commenceimplementation
during the fiscal year of the requested allocation.
11. That the Town of Los Gatos agrees to maintain, or provide for the maintenance of,
the project(s) .and .facilities described in Attachment B, for the benefit of and use by
the public.
~_ k<..;{iy{ r'ta~U Pty t .~~ ~Fi }~"~l ~ ~~''~'r~~r~`~ ~~
t` ~ ~y ~y
t~ ,% t~ sf r 'E.:
$ ~~"' i r
~ i ~~(~ ~ t ik'` n dr 3tiF, k hf j ~ r ~~ ~ F ~Z y ~ r ...y ~~ .
f 1. ~d r
~~~~ , k r } ~ r''C "'~ 1~ ~r~ 1 k ~~,
i (s ~kfJ «~s ~~ ~1 Y~l~ t~Y f `~: N ~.
i ~ kT , 4~ a'F i' .1 C ~Sc` h ~ ~}1 ~ ~~ -:
i a ~,§s, er k~-.r~ ~~ t My~~.t - t~
~ I }rawi~ ~ S ~~*~ ~' _ j°`.i ~?t~ r1.F r~~~f 4L~~ . ~~~~ kT ~,rsF-~~.
5 Y ~ V; At 4~ ~ v - ~' A ' v
f.. ~5~~~~ x.. t~ c~'~'~(~~3; . ~ ~¢¢{ ,.F~-_ 4;~efi.~. 6 P~~. rYX1~i~1'~ ~ ~t' ~~ ~~.'~ _
i'.Y:h._y~~..
~4 ;>.
kef h
F(
iY~-\'
~ ;
~~~
~,~ ~,~ :'
,~
~~~;, -,
~, ;;
,JY ~ _'!
r~~,
-_.
k ~ :~
~, F ~~ z
~~4 r i } ~" -F-
~' t
~.
.=/:Y _ #i~r .~ i+_ ail
lF ~t `~ ty
/
i aS~ 6
QQ
5- r
- ,
?
,.
~ £
v } { :~
~ j'a L~ ~~J 1
M
~
~
~
S-
~ F
~
'~ ~r
i~
l £~, }
T"I~C ; },~
ys
f f~•
~~~~~
~ ~ t~~
's`1
~f~
h ~~3
i
~ 4
Y
R
i ,~7~
~
~f~
r ry
x
~~
~ i~~~ ,
s x ~c -u,~ _ ,~ ~
~ri i~' y
~
~ .
~'
',3
I
1 3S ~ '.
.i
- s Vy :i ~~~ ~ r't
..
.. •' .~~ ~ ~~ c ah~~
r:: +e
> ~ 3 Y:'
r !
$,i
;~ y,~ €~~~
i
1
fl Ail t _~
1~I4 ,
~i,~ .:
i ~L
F
/v