Loading...
2002-056- Ordering The Reorganization Of Certain Uninhabited Territory Designated As Stephanine Lane No.2 (Apn: 523 -26-003) To The Town Of Los GatosRESOLUTION 2002 - 56 RESOLU`T'ION OF THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF LOS GATOS ORDERING THE REORGANIZATION OF CERTAIN UNINHABITED TERRITORY DESIGNATED AS STEPHANIE LANE NO.2 (APN.: 523-26-003) TO THE TOWN OF LOS GATOS WHEREAS, the proposed reorganization to the Town of Los Gatos consisting of all that unincorporated territory designated as .Stephanie Lane No. 2 .(APN: 523-26-003), consisting of approximately 0.183 :acres, located generally on the westerly side of Stephanie Lane, northerly of Blossom Hill Road, in the County of Santa Clara is proposed for reorganization to the Town of Los Gatos pursuant to Division 3 of Title 5, commencing with Section 56000 et seq. of the Government. Code.; WHEREAS, the Town of Los Gatos is authorized by Section 5675'7 to :act as the conducting authority with exclusive power to approve reorganizations within its urban service area; WHEREAS, the Town of Los Gatos has received a petition .signed by all the owners of .land within the territory to be reorganized, and pursuant to Section 56663 of the Government Code, the Town Council of the Town of Los Gatos may initiate proceedings to .reorganize said territory without notice, hearing or election, in the manner described in Section 57002 (d) of the Government Code of the State of California; RESOLVED, by the Town Council of the Town of Los Gatos, County of Santa Clara, State of California that the following. findings are true and. correct: 1. The project is exempt from C.E.Q.A. under the provisions of the California Administrative Code, Title 14, Section 15061(b)(3). S:\Kevin Annex 6.wpd 2. The territory is "Uninhabited" as defined in Section 56046 of the Government Code of the State of California 3. The unincorporated territory is within the Town's urban service area as :adopted by the Local Agency Formation Commission of Santa Clara County. 4. That the County Surveyor has determined that the boundaries of the proposed reorganization are definite and certain. 5. The proposal does not split lines of assessment or ownership. 6. The proposed reorganization does not create islands or areas in which it would be difficult to provide municipal services. 7. The proposal is consistent with the Town's adopted .general plan. 8. The territory is contiguous with the Town's boundaries. 9, The reason for the proposed reorganization is to properly plan and provide municipal services to the area that is contiguous to the Town. 10. All of the owners of property within the territory proposed for .reorganization have consented to the reorganization. FURTHER RESOLVED, by the Town Council of the Town of Los Gatos, a municipal corporation of the County of'.Santa Clara, State of California, that pursuant to the provisions of .Section 57075 of the Government Code of the State of California, the reorganization to the Town of Los Gatos of that territory designated as Stephanie Lane No. 2, .and described in real property description .and map attached hereto, marked Exhibits "A"and "B", respectively, is approved, and that the same be reorganized to the Town of Los Gatos. FURTHER RESOLVED, that upon completion of these reorganization proceedings the territory reorganized will be taxed on the regular county assessment roll, including taxes for existing bonded indebtedness. FURTHER RESOLVED, that upon completion of these reorganization proceedings the territory reorganized will be detached from Santa Clara County Library'Service .Area. S:\Kevin Annex 6.wpd 2 FINALLY RESOLVED, that the Town Clerk is authorized, and is hereby directed, pursuant to Section 57200 of the Government Code, to prepare under seal a certified copy of this resolution, giving the date of passage, and immediately transmit same along with a remittance to cover the fees required by .Section 54902.5 of the Government Code to the .Executive .Officer of the Local Agency Formation Commission of Santa Clara County. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Town Council held on the 6t" day of May, 2002, by the following vote: COUNCIL MEMBERS: AYES: Steven Blanton, Sandy Decker, Steve Glickman, Joe Pirzynski, Mayor Randy Attaway. NAYS:- None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None SIGNED.: MAYOR OF THE TOWN OF LO GATOS LOS GATOS, CALIFORNIA ATTEST: CLERK OF TfiE TOWN OF LOS ATOS LOS GATOS, CALIFORNIA S:\Kevin Annex 6:wpd 3 EXHIBIT A Description of Territory to be Annexed to the Town of Los Gatos STE'PHENIE LANE 2 Apri 2001 All of that. certain property situate in the County of Santa Clara, State of California .and being a portion of the Rancho Rinconada de Los Gatos, and- more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at a :corner in the boundary of the Town of Los Gatos as defined by the annexation to the Town of Los Gatos titled "Winterbrook No. 3", the Resolution for said annexation 'being recorded in January 1.965, said corner also being a point on the Northerly boundary of that certain 9.196-acre parcel described in the Deed from Howard J. Olson,. et ux, to W.C. Hill, et ux, recorded September 27, 1951 in Book 2291 of Official Records, Page 7, Santa Glara County Records.; thence West along said Northerly boundary 45.16 feet to the Northwesterly corner of said parcel; thence leaving said Northerly 'boundary and proceeding S12°49'00"E 50.00 feet along the Westerly boundary of said parcel; thence East 160.00 feet to a point in the centerline of Stephenie Lane; thence proceeding along said centerline N12°49'00"W 50.00 feet to the Northeasterly corner of said 1.196-acre parcel; thence leaving said centerline and proceeding along the Northerly boundary of said parcel West 114.84 feet to the Point of BEGINNING. Containing 7,800 square feet more or less. APN 523-26-003 j; y'obsUcautskayallexh-a.doc o- SCALE: 1 "=40' 4 `~ 0 NOT ' 0 SCALE CENITY MAP LANDS OF KAUTSKAYA 0 ~~~~ R oM ~-°SS "WINTERBROOK N0. 3" t11 ANNEXED TO TOWN 0.F POB ~ LOST GAT05 JANUARY 1965 45.16' WEST 114.84' ~.~:~ . ............ ~..~.~.~. .... ...... Z cry r?~:~.......~... LANDS OF KAUTSKAYA :-:.~.:~:~:~:~:~..... -~• N Z o ~v ...:....:~ DOC. # 15327111 :~:~:~ :.:.:::.:.:.:~:::...:.:..~.;..;,.: ~o 0 0 '~ -;~ 7,.800 SQ. FT. ~;~:~ .... .. .~° ° ~ ~° ~ .APN 523-26-003 :.:.:.:::~:~:~: ~: ~:° Z ...................:~EA57.;.;.,.:...:.,.....::..:...:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~::~:~:~:.. .......... 160.00 Z LEGEND EXISTING BOUNDARY OF THE TOWN OF LOS :GATOS BOUNDARY LINE OF ANNEXATION TO TOWN OF LOS GATOS ANNEXATION TO TOWN OF LOS GATOS STEPHENIE LANE 2 APRIL 2001 ACREAGE: 0.18 f ACRES DI EXHIBIT B J SANTA CLARA 'COUNTY LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION County Government Center, 10~ Floor, East Wing 70 West Hedding Street, San Jose, California 95110 (408).299-4321 (408)298-8460 Fax APPLICATION FORM CHANGE OF ORGANIZATION OR REORGANIZATION PROPOSALS ~ ~~ Pha ~ ~.e ~.a-,,,,e -~~-- I. APPLIC/ANT INFORMATION a. tion is by resolution; .Agency seeking chang~e#~g_anization: Contact Person: Ad e: b. If application is by petition: Contact person for Landowner or Registered Voter seeking change of organization: - / ~15~-c.. Phone.: ~ Z~ 6f S~ ~~~ ~f ~acK s r~~,~' %d ~ l 7 Mailing Address: G'~,d°i~/~ty, ~~Q 9~ro/~ _ II. PROJECT INFORMATION Please provide the following information. You may at#ach additional sheets as needed and indicate so. 1. Project Descri tion: R est fora exation/ dent/ YAnrrranivaF~n to /.freri~ ~~ h ~ ~© - (ci /special district) 2. Number of acres: ~ • /~ Number of parcels: / 3. Number of inhabtants:,~_ Number of dwelling units: 4. Number of registered voters: 2 • ReorgApplicForm.doc Page 1 of 6 April 2001 .:Attachment 2 ~/ t„~ 5. Is the area proposed for annexation in the City is n 's phere of influence? Yes / No . If not, a concurrent sphere amendment is necessary. 6. Is the area proposed for arulexation~~a~+~ ' +~rg~~r~+~~~r in the City's urban service area? Yes ~ No 7. Indicate the parcel numbers of those parcels, if :any, which are under contract with the County under provisions of the Williamson Act: ~6h e 7a. What steps, if any, have been taken or are proposed to release the above parcels .from the contract? /~/i~ 8. For city annexations, what is the pre-zoning that has been applied to the .area? 8a. If there is no.pre-zoning applied to the area, city is :required to demonstrate why. pre-zoning is unnecessary. 9. Describe the development being proposed for the territo y, and when t 's develo merit is~xpected to begin Gdr1.S~/'Gu-~J~c ~- ~~ ~i/~ /'~si~°~c~ 10. -Do the boundaries df the subject territory conform to lines of asses meet and ownership? Yes ~/ No 10a. If NO, please explain the reason .for non-conformity and ;provide justification for LAFCO approval of boundaries that split lines of assessment and ownership.. 11. Do the boundaries of any proposed .annexation create an .island, corridor or strip? Yes No `'~' 11a.If YES, please provide justification for LAFCO.approval of this proposal involving creation of islands. ~~~ \../ 12. How will services such as sewer, water, fire protection, police, garbage, lighting and other urban services be provided to the new development proposed in the area? 13. Will extension of urban services or the construction of public improvements to the area be financed by a special assessment? Yes No ~ 13a.If yes, describe service and or improvements and the average cost per resident or landowner in the area. (service /improvement) (cost per year for "x"years) 14. Lust names and addresses of all cities, special districts, school districts and County service areas located within the area of this proposal{ exclude Santa Clara County Water Dstrict,'San Francisco Bay Area Air Pollution Control district, Qounty Library Zone, and Water Importation). For district reorganizations, list all cities within 3 miles of the affected area. ~f1 ~~S ~t~~s 15. For city annexe ions, list those concurrent or future detachments from special districts, which are proposed for this area. ~~~ ~ 16. Is Agency .requesting a waiver of protest proceedings per Government Code } Section.56663 (c, d)? YES NO `~Lf YES, please sign and attach the Waiver of Protest Proceedings Form. w+ .. 3 r• ~/D y/te'e' %'Glr ,~ ay~ ,~~~'y~c~s III. 100% CONSENT PROPOSALS (Hearing. not required for 100% property owner consent proposals) .For 100% consent proposals, please provide the following information and obtain certification by City / District Clerk. Please attach separa#e sheets, if additional space is required. Owners of land* within the affected area who consent to this proposal should show their consent by signing and printing or typing their names and addresses, with date below and .fill in all the information. If proposal is initiated by property owner petition, .signature is not required, just note "see petition" below and fill in the remaining .information. Date Sign & PRINT name Property Address Parcel# Assessed land value -~, ~~~ /.5~~°j/ _~"~~/~G~r~ieLti Sr2 S ?.~ X03 CERTIFICATE OF CITY/ DISTRICT CLERK I CERTIFY that I .have checked the number of owners of property located within the annexation./ detachment/ reorganization proposed by this .application and that the (number) of signatures above represent all of the owners. of property included in this proposal. I FUIZTI-IER CERTIFY that, pursuant to Government Code Section .56663, the City/District waives the requirement for written notice and .gives consent for the commission to make determinations on this proposal without notice or hearing. Date: City/District Clerk: City/ District of (seal) * Owner of land means any persons shown as the owner of land on the most recent Assessment Roll being prepared by County; where-such person is no longer the owner, then any person entitled to be shown as owner of land on the next Assessment 'Roll; where land is subject to a recorded written agreement of sale, any person. shown therein as :purchaser; and any public agency owning land" Government Code Section 56048 4