Loading...
09 Staff Report - 115 N. Santa Cruz Avenue and 112 Wilder Avenue Coggeshall MansiontpW N 0 !ps GASQS DATE: TO: FROM: MEETING DATE: 4/7/08 ITEM NO: COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT April 3, 2008 MAYOR AND TOWN COUNCIL ,A GREG LARSON, TOWN MANAGER SUBJECT: 115 N. SANTA CRUZ AVENUE AND 112 WILDER AVENUE COGGESHALL MANSION PROPERTY OWNER: SANTA CRUZ WILDER, LLC APPLICANT: JOHN LIEN APPELLANTS: SANTA CRUZ WILDER, LLC AND LEE QUINTANA RECOMMENDATION: 1. Hold the public hearing and receive public testimony; 2. Close the public hearing; 3. Make the following motions: a. Environmental ■ Uphold the decision of the Planning Commission to make the Mitigated Negative Declaration and adopt the Mitigation Monitoring Plan (Exhibits 8 and 9 of Attachment 7). b. Approve the residential land use on Wilder Avenue ■ Make the required findings for the General Plan Amendment and Zone Change (Attachment 9); ■ Move to adopt a Resolution approving the General Plan Amendment (Attachment 11); ■ Move to waive the reading of the Zone Change Ordinance (Attachment 12); ■ Direct the Clerk to read the title of the Zone Change Ordinance (Attachment 12) (no motion required); ■ Move to introduce the Ordinance to effectuate the zone change (Attachment 13). c. Uphold the decision of the Planning Commission to approve the lot line adjustment subject to conditions (Attachment 14). PREPARED BY: BUD N. LORTZ DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT N:ADEV\CNCLRPTS\200Knsc 1 I5.doc Reviewed by: Assistant Town Manager Clerk Administrator Finance Town Attorney amunity Development PAGE 2 MAYOR AND TOWN COUNCIL SUBJECT: 115 N. SANTA CRUZ AVENUE April 7, 2008 d. Approve the modifications to the restaurant ■ Make the required findings for a Conditional Use Permit (Attachment 10); ■ Uphold the decision of the Planning Commission to approve the modification for the conversion of an existing fine dining restaurant into a smaller fine dining restaurant on the first floor and basement (office space would be on the second floor which is a permitted use), subject to conditions (Attachment 14). Deny the two new commercial buildings and approve the modifications to the Coggeshall mansion ■ Make the required findings for the Architecture and Site Application (Attachment 10); ■ Uphold the decision of the Planning Commission and approve the Architecture and Site application as modified by the Commission to modify the exterior of the existing commercial building and to add parking along the west side of the alley subject to conditions (Attachment 15) and deny the request to construct two new detached commercial buildings and additional parking on the east side of the alley. 4. Deny the appeals (Attachments 2 and 3). 5. Refer to the Town Attorney for preparation of the appropriate resolution (no motion required). If the Town Council believes that the Planning Commission's decision should be reversed or modified the Council needs to find one or more of the following (motion required): (1) where there was error or abuse of discretion on the part of the Planning Commission; or (2) the new information that was submitted to the Council during the appeal process that was not readily and reasonably available for submission to the Commission; or (3) an issue or policy over which the Commission did not have discretion to modify or address, but which is vested in the Council for modification or decision. If the predominant reason for modifying or reversing the decision of the Planning Commission is new information as defined in Subsection (2) above, it is the Town's policy that the application be returned to the Commission for review in light of the new information unless the new information has a minimal effect on the application. DISCUSSION: A. Project Summary The applicant's proposal includes the following components: Conversion of Parking Lot to Residence: PAGE 3 MAYOR AND TOWN COUNCIL SUBJECT: 115 N. SANTA CRUZ AVENUE April 7, 2008 The project encompasses two parcels-115 North Santa Cruz Avenue and 112 Wilder Avenue. The project involves a General Plan Amendment, Zone Change, and a lot line adjustment to permit the development of a future residence on a majority of the Wilder Avenue parcel which is currently used as a parking lot. The remainder of the parcel will be retained as a parking lot and combined with the 115 North Santa Cruz parcel. Since the parking lot spaces were used in the Parking Assessment District calculations, a variance is required to eliminate the spaces. Modifications to Restaurant: The project involves a modification of a Conditional Use Permit to reduce the allowed seating for a fine dining restaurant and limit the restaurant to the first floor and basement. No approval is needed for the proposed office space on the second floor. New Retail Buildings: The applicant is requesting Architecture and Site approval to construct two new detached commercial buildings located along North Santa Cruz Avenue, to modify the exterior of the existing Coggleshall Mansion and to add new parking spaces along the alley. Following is discussion on each of the applications. B. General Plan Amendment and Rezoning In order to approve the proposed lot line adjustment, a General Plan amendment and zone change must first be approved for the portion of the Wilder parcel that will be retained as a parking area (retained parking area) and merged with the N. Santa Cruz parcel (Exhibits 3 and 4 of Attachment 7). 1. General Plan Amendment A General Plan Amendment from Medium Density Residential to Central Business District is required for the retained parking area to match the designation of the N. Santa Cruz parcel. 2. Zone Change A Zone Change from R-1D:LHP to C-2:LHP is required for the retained parking area to match the designation of the N. Santa Cruz parcel. PAGE 4 MAYOR AND TOWN COUNCIL SUBJECT: 115 N. SANTA CRUZ AVENUE April 7, 2008 C. Lot Line Adjustment The applicant is proposing to modify the lot lines of the N. Santa Cruz Avenue parcel to include a portion of the Wilder Avenue parcel so that parking spaces serving the existing and proposed commercial uses on the N. Santa Cruz Avenue parcel would be located on the same parcel. The lot line adjustment will not increase the number of lots and both parcels will remain conforming as to lot size. Following is a comparison between the existing and proposed parcels. Existing Land Proposed Land Existing Use Proposed Use Area Area 115 N. Santa Cruz 14,230 sq ft 18,101 sq ft Commercial Commercial Avenue 112 Wilder Avenue 11,246 sq ft 7,375 sq ft Commercial Single Family parking lot Residence D. Architecture and Site The applicant is requesting approval to construct two new detached, one-story retail buildings along the N. Santa Cruz Avenue frontage and to modify the exterior of the existing structure. The applicant is also requesting approval to eliminate the parking lot on Wilder Avenue to accommodate a future residence at this site. New Structures Two new detached one story retail buildings are proposed to bookend the N. Santa Cruz Avenue frontage. A plaza area is proposed between the two buildings. The southern building will be 1,176 square feet and will have a maximum height of 15.5 feet. The northern building will be 424 square feet with a maximum height of 14 feet. The existing square footage of the Coggeshall Mansion is 7,943 square feet. The total square footage of buildings on the commercial site will be 9,543. The allowed FAR for the site (as modified with the lot line adjustment) is .60 and the proposed FAR is .527. The maximum height of the mansion measured from the turret, is approximately 40 feet. Exterior colors and materials of the new buildings will consist of wood shingles to match the existing structure, wood trim, and a dark grey metal standing seam roof. The front setbacks of the new buildings will be two feet six inches. Town Code requires a front setback of ten feet unless findings can be that adequate pedestrian circulation is available, that the setbacks are compatible with the adjacent buildings and that clear sight vision is adequate for vehicular traffic. The applicant is proposing a front setback that matches the building lines of the retail buildings south of the subject parcel. The reduced setback enhances the retail continuity of the street. PAGE 5 MAYOR AND TOWN COUNCIL SUBJECT: 115 N. SANTA CRUZ AVENUE April 7, 2008 Pedestrian circulation and the sight vision for vehicular traffic will not be impacted by the setback reduction. The proposed setbacks are consistent with the Commercial Design Guidelines which state that facades in the C-2 zone should be setback from the street property line no more than five feet. 2. Existing Structure To provide secondary access for the proposed office use, an exterior stair is proposed on the northern side of the Coggeshall Mansion. An existing window will be replaced with a door to accommodate the stair access. At the nonhistoric portion of the structure, the existing portico, deck and stairs for the outside dining will be removed and replaced with a new exterior dining area directly behind the proposed new building on the south side of the parcel. A new awning is also proposed above the doors to the outside patio area. None of the changes proposed will impact the integrity of the mansion. Fencing The existing wrought iron fencing along the N. Santa Cruz Avenue frontage is protected under the Landmark Historic Preservation Overlay zone. The fencing will remain except for two openings to access the proposed retail buildings. 4. Parking Lot The Wilder Avenue parcel contains a parking lot for the existing commercial use and a trash enclosure. Access to the parking lot is from Wilder Avenue and the alley. The parcel has a General Plan designation of Medium Residential and a R-1D:LHP zone which allows a residential use. Therefore, the existing parking lot use is nonconforming. The conversion of the parking lot to a residential use would make the use of the parcel conforming. In addition, the construction of a residence would complete the residential character of the street by eliminating a commercial use in a residential neighborhood and would increase the Town's housing stock. The trash enclosure is proposed to be relocated at the rear of the N. Santa Cruz Avenue parcel along the southern property line. E. Architectural Review The Town's Consulting Architect, Cannon Design Group, reviewed and commented on several versions of the plans for this project (Exhibits 12 and 13 of Attachment 7). In terms of architectural design of the buildings as proposed, the applicant has incorporated all of Cannon's comments. Based on the Town's Commercial Design Guidelines and comments from staff and the Historic Preservation Committee, Cannon summarized the three following primary issues for considering the project. PAGE 6 MAYOR AND TOWN COUNCIL SUBJECT: 115 N. SANTA CRUZ AVENUE April 7, 2008 To what degree will the infill of a significant portion of the garden in front of the mansion compromise the historic setting and quality of the existing structure? Will the added structures improve or detract from the urban design quality of Downtown Los Gatos? Is the amount of proposed new construction in the front garden area appropriate for the site? Cannon concluded that these important issues are value judgments that the Town would need to make. To assist staff and the deciding body, Cannon provided the following range of options which are arranged from the least to the most impact on the current site conditions. The applicant designed the plans based on the third option of decreasing the original size of the proposed northern structure. • No project. • Limit the addition to one structure. • Decrease the size of the structure to the north. • Modify the design of the north building. F. Conditional Use Permit The applicant is requesting approval to modify the Conditional Use Pen-nit to reduce the number of restaurant seats and to limit the restaurant use to the basement and first floor of the existing building. The second floor will be converted to office space which is an allowed use. Office space above a first floor is permitted in the C-2 zone and does not require a Conditional Use Permit. The number of seats will decrease from 198 (inside and out) to 135 (inside and out). No other changes are proposed to the use of the restaurant. G. Parking There are 22 parking spaces on the project site (16 spaces in the Wilder Avenue parking lot and six spaces along the alleyway) and 44 parking spaces in the Parking Assessment District (PAD) for a total of 66 spaces. The project would reconfigure the two project parcels so that the six existing on-site parking spaces along the western side of the alley would be located on the N. Santa Cruz Avenue parcel and seven on-site spaces would be added on the eastern side of the alley for a total of 13 on-site parking spaces. The project would result in a reduction of nine on-site parking spaces. With the 44 spaces in the PAD, the project would have a total of 57 parking spaces. Based on the proposed change of use discussed earlier in this report, the parking requirement for the proposed commercial site would decrease and the proposed parking requirement would be met. The proposed residential lot on Wilder Avenue will require two parking spaces. A conceptual location of a two car garage for this property has been shown on the development plans which will have access from the alley. The following table outlines the required parking for the commercial use: PAGE 7 MAYOR AND TOWN COUNCIL SUBJECT: 115 N. SANTA CRUZ AVENUE April 7, 2008 USE AREA/ RATIO PARKING # OF SEATS REQUIRED Retail 1,600 sq ft 1/300 sq ft 6 Office 1,262 sq ft 1/250 sq ft 6 Restaurant 135 seats 1/3 seats 45 Proposed Parking In District 44 On Site 13 Total Parking 57 Required Parking 57 H. Variance As stated earlier in this report, the applicant is proposing to convert the commercial parking lot on Wilder Avenue to a residential use. This project proposes a net removal of nine commercial parking spaces. Section 29.10.150 (5) of the Town Code states that parking spaces credited in the PAD cannot be eliminated. If parking spaces are eliminated, a variance is required. Under the provisions of Section 65906 of the State Government Code, a variance is appropriate if there are any unusual or special circumstances that encumber or place any undue hardships on a property. This parcel is located in the PAD, a unique area established by the Town in order to relieve the parking issues surrounding the downtown area. When the PAD was established, the concept that a property owner may want to reduce their land use intensity was never considered, therefore the Town Code did not include any provisions to reduce the parking requirements. Since the applicant is proposing to remove the parking lot to accommodate a residential use, and still meet the required parking for the commercial use, an undue hardship would be imposed on the property owner by denying the project based solely upon the removal of these parking spaces. The Commission approved a similar variance request in 2007 on Almendra Avenue, to convert a parcel which had an office use to a residential use. By approving this project the Town would not be granting a special privilege not enjoyed by other property owners. Therefore, Town staff believes that the findings can be made to grant a variance. 1. Planning Commission The Commission considered these applications on January 23 and February 13, 2008 and took the following actions: PAGE 8 MAYOR AND TOWN COUNCIL SUBJECT: 115 N. SANTA CRUZ AVENUE April 7, 2008 Environmental Review: Made the Mitigated Negative Declaration and adopted the Mitigation Monitoring Plan. Recommended approval of: 1. A General Plan Amendment from Medium Density Residential to Central Business District for a portion of the parking lot parcel. 2. A Zone Change from R-1D:LHP to C-2:LHP for a portion of the parking lot parcel. Approved: 1. Subdivision application for a lot line adjustment (approval is contingent upon Councils adoption of the General Plan amendment and Zone Change). 2. A modification to a Conditional Use Permit for the conversion of an existing fine dining restaurant into a smaller fine dining restaurant on the first floor and basement (office space would be on the second floor which is a permitted use). A portion of an Architecture and Site application to modify the exterior of the existing commercial building and to add parking along the west side of the alley. 4. A Variance to convert the existing parking lot which fronts on Wilder Avenue to a residential use. The Commission stated that they did not rely on the Almendra variance as a precedent. Denied: 1. A portion of the Architecture and Site application for two new detached commercial buildings and additional parking on the east side of the alley. Town Committee Meetings Historic Preservation Committee The Historic Preservation Committee (HPC) considered preliminary plans on April 5, 2006. The Committee first considered the applications on February 27, 2007. At this meeting, for the proposed buildings the Committee recommended to increase the opening to the site from N. Santa Cruz Avenue by adjusting the southern building and that the southern building maintain its rounded corner (Attachment 16). The Committee commented that the new buildings did not have to be symmetrical. The Committee also stated that they endorsed the concept that the paved parking lot on Wilder Avenue be eliminated and replaced with a residence which will be more in keeping with the historic neighborhood. PAGE 9 MAYOR AND TOWN COUNCIL SUBJECT: 115 N. SANTA CRUZ AVENUE April 7, 2008 The Committee considered revised plans on March 21, 2007 (Attachment 17). At this meeting some of the Committee members raised additional concerns about the proposed buildings. The Committee took the following actions: Detennined that the applications should proceed to the next step, 2. Recommended approval of the proposed changes to the existing structure, 3. Determined that the two proposed detached structures would be acceptable for the site and had the following three comments regarding the proposed structures: ■ The southern structure should be redesigned to be more subservient (regarding style, scale and mass), to the mansion. ■ Consider a more transparent building. ■ The context of the mansion shall be protected. Subsequent to this meeting, the applicant revised their plans to incorporate some recommendations from the Town's Consulting Architect. The revised plans were considered by the HPC on September 19, 2007. The Committee determined that their action from the previous meeting were still applicable (Attachment 18). 2. General Plan Committee On February 28, 2007, the General Plan Committee considered the applicant's request to amend the General Plan Designation and change the zone for a portion of the parking lot parcel. The other applications were not part of the Committee's review. The Committee recommended approval of the General Plan amendment and Zone Change subject to the approval of the other applications associated with the entire project. 3. Conceptual Development Advisory Committee On February 8, 2006, the CDAC considered a preliminary application for a similar request. However, these plans proposed residential condominiums on the second floor, not an office use. The Committee expressed numerous comments about the proposal (Exhibit 16 of Attachment 7). APPEALS: The applicant and a concerned citizen, Lee Quintana, each filed an appeal of the Planning Commission's decision on the basis that the Commission erred or abused its discretion in their decision (Attachments 2 and 3). The basis for the appeals is summarized as follows. A response from staff follows each comment made by the appellants. PAGE 10 MAYOR AND TOWN COUNCIL SUBJECT: 115 N. SANTA CRUZ AVENUE April 7, 2008 A. Applicant's Appeal The applicant has questioned if Architecture and Site was required for the work proposed since the buildings proposed were not the principal building, did not meet the Town Code definition of an intensification of land use, and the alterations proposed were minor. Staff Comment: The Planning Commission based their decision on the design and site impacts of the proposed buildings. Section 29.20.145 of the Town Code states that Architecture and Site approval is required for new construction of any principal building as well as any exterior alterations or additions to an existing building (which excludes minor exterior alterations to a commercial building). The two buildings proposed do not meet the definition of an accessory structure and are therefore considered principal buildings. The changes proposed to the historic mansion could have been detennined to be minor. If the changes were determined to be minor, pursuant to Section 29.20.485(3) of the Town Code, the work proposed to the historic structure would have required a Minor Historic Architecture and Site Application for which the HPC could take action on. Since the work proposed to the mansion was part of other development applications for the site and since the Town does not bifurcate applications, the alterations proposed to the mansion were incorporated in the Architecture and Site Application. 2. The Commission did not discuss the design issues required by Town Code for Architecture and Site applications and based their decision on the land use. Staff Comment: Section 29.20.150(4) of the Town Code allows the deciding body to consider the location and orientation of buildings and open spaces in relationship to the physical characteristics of the site and the appearance and harmony of the buildings with adjacent development. In evaluating applications on LHP sites, Section 29.80.290 of the Town Code states that the deciding body shall include considering architectural style, design, arrangement and other pertinent factors. This section further states that on LHP sites, the proposed work will neither adversely affect features of the landmark nor adversely affect the character of historical, architectural, or aesthetic interest or value of the landmark site and its site. The Commission did not consider how the project was consistent with the General Plan. Staff Comment: The report to the Commission included the applicant's letter of justification which cited sections of the General Plan with which the application was consistent. PAGE II MAYOR AND TOWN COUNCIL SUBJECT: 115 N. SANTA CRUZ AVENUE April 7, 2008 4. The Environmental documents stated that the new buildings would have a less-than- significant impact and the HPC recommended that the development of the detached structures would be acceptable with revisions to the design. Staff Comment: No comment. The Commission had a narrow focus on considering the impact on the visibility of the historic mansion. Staff Comment: See staff comment above regarding review of LHP sites. 6. The Commission did not consider the balance between preserving and enhancing the Town's livability while supporting the economic vitality thatprovides resources for community services. Staff Comment: No comment. 7. A reduction in the number of seats was requested as part of the request for a modification of the Conditional Use Permit to reallocate the parking to support the two proposed retail buildings. In denying the request for the two buildings, the required parking for the uses at the site was decreased, which resulted in excess parking for the site. The Commission did not increase the number of seats for the restaurant based on the excess spaces that were made available by the Commission's action. Staff Comment: As approved by the Commission, the intensity of the site was reduced and as a result, there is an excess of two parking spaces that are not allocated to any use. Therefore, the restaurant seating could be increased by six seats for a total of 141 seats. B. Citizen Appeal The Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration are not adequate in assessing the impact to the historic structure and setting and that there is a fair argument to require an EIR. Staff Comment: The Planning Commission denied the Architecture and Site application for the two new buildings; therefore, there is no environmental impact. During the public hearing on this matter, there was a misunderstanding that the new buildings could not be approved as proposed since the environmental documents noted that the HPC recommended that changes be made to the proposed buildings. This misunderstanding was not a basis for the Planning Commission's action on this matter since they were opposed to any new building. Subsequent to the meeting, the Town's Environmental Consultants clarified in writing that the proposed two new retail buildings would be considered to have PAGE 12 MAYOR AND TOWN COUNCIL SUBJECT: 115 N. SANTA CRUZ AVENUE April 7, 2008 a less-than-significant impact on the aesthetic character of the property and prepared an Errata Sheet for the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration (Attachment 1). The Aesthetics section of the Initial Study did not include mitigation measures since no significant aesthetic impacts were found to result from the currently proposed design of the new buildings. In addition, the Initial Study had no mitigation measures that the buildings be redesigned to meet the directions of the HPC. Therefore, a Mitigated Negative Declaration could be made to approve the two buildings as proposed by the applicant and an EIR would not be required. The Consultant further states that if Council determines that the southern building should be redesigned as recommended by the HPC, an addendum to the environmental documents would be appropriate for clarification of the minor changes to the proposed project. An Addendum would not require a public review period or a public hearing. In addition, Section 21084.1 of the Public Resources Code, states that a project that may have a significant impact on the environment is a project that may cause a substantial adverse change in the significant of an historical resource. Section 15064.5(b)(1) of the California Code of Regulations states that a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource means physical demolition, destruction, relocation, or alterations of the resource or its immediate surroundings such that the significance of an historical resource would be materially impaired. Subsection (3) of this Code further states that a project that follows the Secretary of Interior `s Standards for Rehabilitation and Illustrated Guidelines for Rehabilitation shall be considered as mitigated to a level of less than significant impact on the historic resource. In reviewing the Secretary of Interior's Standards, the document recommends to identify, retain and preserve buildings and their features as well as features of the site that are important in defining its overall historic character. Ordinance HD-75-6 (Exhibit 11 of Attachment 7), identifies the features of the mansion which justifies the historic designation. The Ordinance notes that the only other feature that should be preserved is the fencing. The Ordinance does not note that the site area and landscape features should be preserved, which is clearly identified as a possible feature to preserve. The Standards list what is recommended and not recommended for site development. Both Town Staff and the Historic Preservation Committee stated that two new buildings would be acceptable for the site, and a redesign was recommended for the southern structure to be more sympathetic to the historic mansion and site which is consistent with the following Standards recommendations. The Standards recommend that new construction be designed which is compatible with the historic character of the site and which preserves the historical relationships between the buildings and the landscape. The Standards do not recommend the introduction of a new building or site feature that is out of scale or an otherwise inappropriate design. The Standards also do not recommend the introduction of new construction onto a building site which is visually incompatible in terms of size, scale, design, materials, color and texture which destroys historic relationships on the site, or which damages or destroys important landscape features. PAGE 13 MAYOR AND TOWN COUNCIL SUBJECT: 115 N. SANTA CRUZ AVENUE April 7, 2008 CONCLUSION: If Council determines that the southern and/or northern building(s) as proposed or modified are acceptable, staff recommends that the outdoor dining area be redesigned to be more visible and that the plaza be designed to incorporate seating areas and potentially two to three historically- designed push carts could be allowed to create vitality to the plaza that would encourage pedestrians to enter the site. Providing visible activities and passive areas will activate the site, strengthen the retail streetscape in downtown, and promote pedestrian circulation. To approve the southern and /or northern building(s) staff recommends that one or both buildings and the plaza be redesigned and that Council take the following action: 1. Remand the Architecture and Site application and the Conditional Use Permit to the Planning Commission. 2. Direct the applicant to make the desired changes to one or both buildings. 3. Direct the applicant to create a plaza that has visible outside dining. 4. Direct the applicant to incorporate seating areas and other pedestrian friendly activities in the plaza. 5. Direct staff to recalculate the required parking for the site and allowed seats permitted for the restaurant use based on the redesigned project. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: It has been determined that this project will not have a significant impact on the environment and a Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared for this proposal. FISCAL IMPACT: None. Attachments: Previously Submitted to Town Council: 1. Letter from Town's Environmental Consultant, Geier & Geier, which includes an errata sheet for the Initial Study, dated January 31, 2008. 2. Appeal from Santa Cruz Wilder, LLC, received February 1, 2008. 3. Appeal from Lee Quintana, received February 4, 2008. 4. Excerpt of the Planning Commission meeting minutes of February 13, 2008. 5. Report to the Planning Commission for the meeting of February 13, 2008. 6. Excerpt of the Planning Commission meeting minutes of January 23, 2008. 7. Report to the Planning Commission for the meeting of January 23, 2008. 8. Desk Item Report for the Planning Commission meeting of January 23, 2008. 9. Information Report from John Lien dated April 7, 2008. New Submittals: 10. Required Findings and Considerations. PAGE 14 MAYOR AND TOWN COUNCIL SUBJECT: 115 N. SANTA CRUZ AVENUE April 7, 2008 11. Resolution for General Plan Amendment. 12. Ordinance for Zone Change. 13. Conditions of Approval for the Lot Line Adjustment. 14. Conditions of Approval for the Conditional Use Permit. 15. Conditions of Approval for the Architecture and Site Application. 16. Excerpt from the HPC minutes for the meeting of February 27, 2007. 17. Excerpt from the HPC minutes for the meeting of March 21, 2007. 18. Excerpt from the HPC minutes for the meeting of September 19, 2007. 19. Letter from Kathy Anderson (one page), received March 3, 2008. 20. Letter from Lee Quintana (five pages), received March 26, 2008. Distribution: John Lien, 196 College Avenue, Los Gatos, CA 95030 Santa Cruz Wilder, LLC, 50 W. San Fernando Street #320, San Jose, CA 95113 Lee Quintana, 5 Palm Avenue, Los Gatos, CA 95030 BNL:RT:SLB:mdc Date: April 7, 2008 Subject: 115 N. Santa Cruz Avenue and 112 Wilder Avenue ATTACHMENTS 1-9 (Previously Submitted to Town Council) ARE AVAILABLE FOR REVIEW IN THE CLERK DEPARTMENT REQUIRED FINDINGS AND CONSIDERATIONS FOR 115 N. Santa Cruz Avenue and 112 Wilder Avenue Negative Declaration ND-07-10 Subdivision Application M-07-005 General Plan Amendment GP-07-01 Zone Change Z-07-001 Architecture and Site Application S-07-019 Conditional Use Permit U-07-020 Variance Application V-07-01 Requesting approval of 1) a lot line adjustment, 2) a General Plan amendment from Medium Density Residential to Central Business for a portion of the parking lot parcel, 3) a zone change from R-1D:LHP to C-2:LHP for a portion of the parking lot parcel, 4) conversion of an existing fine dining restaurant into a smaller fine dining restaurant on the first floor and office space on the second floor, 5) two new detached commercial buildings, 6) modification to the exterior of the existing commercial building, and 7) conversion of the existing parking lot which fronts on Wilder Avenue to a residential lot, on properties zoned C-2:LHP and R- 1D:LHP. No significant environmental impacts have been identified as a result of this project, and a Mitigated Negative Declaration is recommended. APN 510-17-065 and 071 PROPERTY OWNER: Santa Cruz Wilder, LLC APPLICANT: John Lien FINDINGS ■ All General Plan Amendments must be found to be internally consistent with the General Plan. ■ That the zone change is consistent with the General Plan. ■ As required by Section 29.20.170 of the Town Code for granting a variance the deciding body, on the basis of the evidence submitted at the hearing, may grant a variance if it finds that: (1) Because of special circumstances applicable to the property, including size, shape, topography, location or surroundings, the strict application of this ordinance deprives such property of privileges enjoyed by other property in the vicinity and under identical zone; and (2) The granting of a variance would not constitute a grant of special privileges inconsistent with the limitations upon other properties in the vicinity and zone in which such property is situated. ■ As required by Section 29.20.190 of the Town Code for granting a Conditional Use Permit. The deciding body, on the basis of the evidence submitted at the hearing, may grant a Attachment 10 conditional use permit when specifically authorized by the provisions of the Town Code if it finds that: (1) The proposed uses of the property are essential or desirable to the public convenience or welfare; (2) The proposed uses will not impair the integrity and character of the zone; (3) The proposed uses would not be detrimental to public health, safety or general welfare; and (4) The proposed uses of the property are in harmony with the various elements or objectives of the General Plan and the purposes of the Town Code. ■ That the work proposed is consistent with the Redevelopment Plan for the Los Gatos Redevelopment Project Area (Section IV.B). CONSIDERATIONS ■ As required by Section 29.20.150 of the Town Code for Architecture and Site applications. Sec. 29.20.150. Considerations in review of applications. The deciding body shall consider all relevant matter including, but not limited to, the following: (1) Considerations relating to traffic safety and traffic congestion. The effect of the site development plan on traffic conditions on abutting streets; the layout of the site with respect to locations and dimensions of vehicular and pedestrian entrances, exits, drives, and walkways; the adequacy of off-street parking facilities to prevent traffic congestion; the location, arrangement, and dimension of truck loading and unloading facilities; the circulation pattern within the boundaries of the development, and the surfacing, lighting and handicapped accessibility of off- street parking facilities. a. Any project or development that will add traffic to roadways and critical intersections shall be analyzed, and a determination made on the following matters: The ability of critical roadways and major intersections to accommodate existing traffic; 2. Increased traffic estimated for approved developments not yet occupied; and Regional traffic growth and traffic anticipated for the proposed project one (1) year after occupancy. b. The deciding body shall review the application for traffic roadway/intersection capacity and make one (1) of the following determinations: The project will not impact any roadways and/or intersections causing the roadways and/or intersections to exceed their available capacities. 2. The project will impact a roadway(s) and/or intersection(s) causing the roadway(s) and/or intersection(s) to exceed their available capacities. Any project receiving Town determination subsection (1)b.1. may proceed. Any project receiving Town determination subsection (1)b.2. must be modified or denied if the deciding body determines that the impact is unacceptable. In determining the acceptability of a traffic impact, the deciding body shall consider if the project's benefits to the community override the traffic impacts as determined by specific sections from the general plan and any applicable specific plan. (2) Considerations relating to outdoor advertising. The number, location, color, size, height, lighting and landscaping of outdoor advertising signs and structures in relation to the creation of traffic hazards and the appearance and harmony with adjacent development. Specialized lighting and sign systems may be used to distinguish special areas or neighborhoods such as the downtown area and Los Gatos Boulevard. (3) Considerations relating to landscaping. The location, height, and materials of walls, fences, hedges and screen plantings to insure harmony with adjacent development or to conceal storage areas, utility installations, parking lots or unsightly development; the planting of ground cover or other surfacing to prevent dust and erosion; and the unnecessary destruction of existing healthy trees. Emphasize the use of planter boxes with seasonal flowers to add color and atmosphere to the central business district. Trees and plants shall be approved by the Director of Parks, Forestry and Maintenance Services for the purpose of meeting special criteria, including climatic conditions, maintenance, year-round versus seasonal color change (blossom, summer foliage, autumn color), special branching effects and other considerations. (4) Considerations relating to site layout. The orientation and location of buildings and open spaces in relation to the physical characteristics of the site and the character of the neighborhood; and the appearance and harmony of the buildings with adjacent development. Buildings should strengthen the form and image of the neighborhood (e.g. downtown, Los Gatos Boulevard, etc.). Buildings should maximize preservation of solar access. In the downtown, mid-block pedestrian arcades linking Santa Cruz Avenue with existing and new parking facilities shall be encouraged, and shall include such crime prevention elements as good sight lines and lighting systems. (5) Considerations relating to drainage. The effect of the site development plan on the adequacy of storm and surface water drainage. (6) Considerations relating to the exterior architectural design of buildings and structures. The effect of the height, width, shape and exterior construction and design of buildings and structures as such factors relate to the existing and future character of the neighborhood and purposes of the zone in which they are situated, and the purposes of architecture and site approval. Consistency and compatibility shall be encouraged in scale, massing, materials, color, texture, reflectivity, openings and other details. (7) Considerations relating to lighting and street furniture. Streets, walkways, and building lighting should be designed so as to strengthen and reinforce the image of the Town. Street furniture and equipment, such as lamp standards, traffic signals, fire hydrants, street signs, telephones, mail boxes, refuse receptacles, bus shelters, drinking fountains, planters, kiosks, flag poles and other elements of the street environment should be designated and selected so as to strengthen and reinforce the Town image. (8) Considerations relating to access for physically disabled persons. The adequacy of the site development plan for providing accessibility and adaptability for physically disabled persons. Any improvements to a nonresidential building where the total valuation of alterations, structural repairs or additions exceeds a threshold value established by resolution of the Town Council, shall require the building to be modified to meet the accessibility requirements of title 24 of the California Administrative Code adaptability and accessibility. In addition to retail, personal services and health care services are not allowable uses on nonaccessible floors in new nonresidential buildings. Any change of use to retail, health care, or personal service on a nonaccessible floor in a nonresidential building shall require that floor to be accessible to physically disabled persons pursuant to the accessibility requirements of title 24 of the California Administrative Code and shall not qualify the building for unreasonable hardship exemption from meeting any of those requirements. This provision does not effect lawful uses in existence prior to the enactment of this chapter. All new residential developments shall comply with the Town's adaptability and accessibility requirements for physically disabled persons established by resolution. (9) Considerations relating to the location of a hazardous waste management facility. A hazardous waste facility shall not be located closer than five hundred (500) feet to any residentially zoned or used property or any property then being used as a public or private school primarily educating persons under the age of eighteen (18). An application for such a facility will require an environmental impact report, which may be focused through the initial study process. ■ As required by Section 29.80.290 of the Town Code for landmark sites. Sec. 29.80.290. Standards for review. In evaluating applications, the deciding body shall consider the architectural style, design, arrangement, texture, materials and color, and any other pertinent factors. Applications shall not be granted unless: On landmark sites, the proposed work will neither adversely affect the exterior architectural characteristics or other features of the landmark (and, where specified in the designating ordinance for a publicly owned landmark, its major interior architectural features) nor adversely affect the character of historical, architectural or aesthetic interest or value of the landmark and its site. THE FOLLOWING FINDING WOULD ONLY BE APPLICABLE FOR THE TWO PROPOSED COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS WHICH WAS DENIED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION ■ As required by Section 29.60.337 of the Town Code for reducing the front setback. Sec. 29.60.337. Improvements within yards abutting a street. (a) Improvements may be permitted in any required front yard and any required side yard abutting a street in a C-2 or central business district commercial zone if the deciding body makes all of the following findings: (1) Pedestrian safety will not be impaired; (2) The streetscape would be enhanced as a result of the proposed improvements; (3) The improvements are in character with the adjacent buildings; and (4) The improvements will not obstruct the clear sight vision of vehicular traffic. N: \DE V\FINDING S\nsc 115.1. doc RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION OF THE TOWN OF LOS GATOS AMENDING THE GENERAL PLAN TO CHANGE THE DESIGNATION FROM MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL TO CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT FOR A PORTION OF A PROPERTY AT 112 WILDER AVENUE TO BE COMBINED WITH 115 N. SANTA CRUZ AVENUE WHEREAS, pursuant to Government Code Section 65353, the Town Council conducted a public hearing for consideration of amendments to the General Plan on , 2008. WHEREAS, during this hearing, the Town Council considered the General Plan Amendment to change the land use designation from Medium Density Residential to Central Business District for a portion of the property. RESOLVED, the Town Council finds that (a) the proposed General Plan amendment is internally consistent with the existing goals and policies of the General Plan and its corresponding elements and (b) that all proceedings have been conducted in compliance with the provisions of Government Code Section 65350 et seq. RESOLVED, the Town Council hereby changes the land use designation of the General Plan as shown on Exhibit A from Medium Density Residential to Central Business District. ATTACHMENT 11 PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Town Council of the Town of Los Gatos, California, held on the day of 2008 by the following vote: COUNCIL MEMBERS AYES: NAYES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: SIGNED: GATOS ATTEST: MAYOR OF THE TOWN OF LOS LOS GATOS, CALIFORNIA CLERK OF THE TOWN OF LOS GATOS LOS GATOS, CALIFORNIA nsc115.GPamend 115 N. Santa Cruz 112 Wilder Avenue TOWN OF LOS GATOS Application No. GP-07-001 A.P.N. # 510-17-071 Change of the general plan leap amending the Town General Plan. From: Medium Density Residential (5-12 units per acre) To: Central Business District Reconunended by Planning Cornnlission Date: t l Approved by Town Council Date: Reso: Town Clerk Mayor Exhibit A ORDINANCE AN ORDINANCE OF THE TOWN OF LOS GATOS AMENDING THE ZONING MAP FROM R-1D:LHP TO C-2:LHP FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 112 WILDER AVENUE TO BE COMBINED WITH 115 N. SANTA CRUZ AVENUE THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF LOS GATOS ORDAINS: SECTION I The Zoning Map of the Town is hereby amended as shown on Exhibit A. SECTION II This Ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the Town Council of the Town of Los Gatos on, 2008, and adopted by the following vote as an ordinance of the Town of Los Gatos at a meeting of the Town Council of the Town of Los Gatos on , 2008. This ordinance takes effect 30 days after it is adopted. COUNCIL MEMBERS: AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: SIGNED: MAYOR OF THE TOWN OF LOS GATOS LOS GATOS, CALIFORNIA ATTEST: CLERK ADMINISTRATOR TOWN OF LOS GATOS LOS GATOS, CALIFORNIA N:ADEV\ORDS\nsc 115.zc.doc ATTACHMNT 12 ,I, t t 1 j _ I r r Li'H I t 1r~` r ':/YY r l / 1~ f r r f ~T~~ !rr P r- f ~ r r, fr 1, Jr ~ l r (1 .fI yam` 115 N Santa Cruz 112 Wilder Avenue TOWN OF LOS GATOS Application No. Z-07-001 A.P.N. # 510-17-071 Change of the zoning map amending the Town Zoning Ordinance. x Zone Change Prezoning From: R-1D:LHP To: C-2:LHP Recommended by Planning Commission Date: 6)11R~-~~O Approved by Town Council Date: Ord: Town Clerk Mayor Exhibit A CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT 115 N. Santa Cruz Avenue and 112 Wilder Avenue Negative Declaration ND-07-10 Subdivision Application M-07-005 General Plan Amendment GP-07-01 Zone Change Z-07-001 Architecture and Site Application S-07-019 Conditional Use Permit U-07-020 Variance Application V-07-01 Requesting approval of 1) a lot line adjustment, 2) a General Plan amendment from Medium Density Residential to Central Business for a portion of the parking lot parcel, 3) a zone change from R-1D:LHP to C-2:LHP for a portion of the parking lot parcel, 4) conversion of an existing fine dining restaurant into a smaller fine dining restaurant on the first floor and office space on the second floor, 5) two new detached commercial buildings, 6) modification to the exterior of the existing commercial building, and 7) conversion of the existing parking lot which fronts on Wilder Avenue to a residential lot, on properties zoned C-2:LHP and R-1D:LHP. No significant environmental impacts have been identified as a result of this project, and a Mitigated Negative Declaration is recommended. APN 510-17-065 and 071 PROPERTY OWNER: Santa Cruz Wilder, LLC APPLICANT: John Lien TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT (Planning Division) APPROVAL. The approval of this application is contingent upon the adoption of the General Plan amendment and the Zone Change for the lot area being adjusted. TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE DIRECTOR OF PARKS AND PUBLIC WORKS (Public Works Division) 2. CERTIFICATE OF LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT. A Certificate of Lot Line Adjustment shall be recorded. Two copies of the legal description for each new lot configuration, a plat map (8-% in. X 1 I in.) and two copies of the legal description of the land to be exchanged shall be submitted to the Engineering Division of the Parks & Public Works Department for review and approval. The submittal shall include closure calculations, title reports less than 90 days old and the appropriate fee. The certificate shall be recorded before any permits may be issued. N:ADEV\C0NDITNS\2008\nsc 115.11a.doc ATTACH ENT 13 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 115 N. Santa Cruz Avenue and 112 Wilder Avenue Negative Declaration ND-07-10 Subdivision Application M-07-005 General Plan Amendment GP-07-01 Zone Change Z-07-001 Architecture and Site Application S-07-019 Conditional Use Permit U-07-020 Variance Application V-07-01 Requesting approval of 1) a lot line adjustment, 2) a General Plan amendment from Medium Density Residential to Central Business for a portion of the parking lot parcel, 3) a zone change from R-1D:LHP to C-2:LHP for a portion of the parking lot parcel, 4) conversion of an existing fine dining restaurant into a smaller fine dining restaurant on the first floor and office space on the second floor, 5) two new detached commercial buildings, 6) modification to the exterior of the existing commercial building, and 7) conversion of the existing parking lot which fronts on Wilder Avenue to a residential lot, on properties zoned C-2:LHP and R-1D:LHP. No significant environmental impacts have been identified as a result of this project, and a Mitigated Negative Declaration is recommended. APN 510-17-065 and 071 PROPERTY OWNER: Santa Cruz Wilder, LLC APPLICANT: John Lien TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE PLANNING DIRECTOR: (Planning Division) 1. EXPIRATION: Zoning approval will expire two years from the approval date pursuant to Section 29.20.320 of the Town Code, unless the approval has been vested. 2. RESTAURANT USE: A high quality restaurant and full service bar is permitted on the first floor and the basement. 3. HOURS: Maximum hours of operation for the inside restaurant and bar shall be 11 AM to 1 AM weekdays and 9 AM to 1 AM Saturday and Sunday. Maximum hours of operation for the outside seating area shall be the salve except that alcohol service shall not go past 1 I PM Sunday through Thursday, except for holidays and evenings before holidays. 4. SEATS. The maximum number of seats (inside and outside combined) shall not exceed 135. 5. ALCOHOL SERVICE: The service of alcohol for the restaurant dining area (inside and outside) is permitted only with meals. A meal is defined as a combination of food items selected from a menu (breakfast, brunch, lunch, or ATTACHMENT 14 dinner). Appetizers such as popcorn, nachos, pretzels, potato skins, relish trays, etc. (hot or cold) are not meals. 6. DELIVERIES: Deliveries shall be no earlier than 7:00 a.m. 7. PORCH AREA: No chairs shall be in the porch area. TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE DIRECTOR OF PARKS AND PUBLIC WORKS (Public Works Section) GREASE TRAPS: Meet all requirements of the County Health Department and West Valley Sanitation District for the interception, separation, or pretreatment of effluent. TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE CHIEF OF POLICE: 9. GENERAL: The restaurant is subject to the following: a. Uniformed privately provided security guards may be required in or around the premises by the Chief of Police if alcohol related problems recur that are not resolved by the licensed owner. b. At the discretion of the Chief of Police, periodic meetings will be conducted with representatives from the Police Department for on-going employee training on alcoholic beverage service to the general public. C. All establishments shall use an employee training manual that addresses alcoholic beverage service consistent with the standards of the California Restaurant Association. d. All licensed operators shall have and shall actively promote a designated driver program such as complimentary non-alcoholic beverages for designated drivers. e. Taxicab telephone numbers shall be posted in a visible location. f. A restaurant employee shall seat patrons in the outside dining area. N:ADEV\C0NDITNS\2008\nsc 115.cup.doc CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Architecture and Site Application 115 N. Santa Cruz Avenue and 112 Wilder Avenue Negative Declaration ND-07-10 Subdivision Application M-07-005 General Plan Amendment GP-07-01 Zone Change Z-07-001 Architecture and Site Application S-07-019 Conditional Use Permit U-07-020 Variance Application V-07-01 Requesting approval of 1) a lot line adjustment, 2) a General Plan amendment from Medium Density Residential to Central Business for a portion of the parking lot parcel, 3) a zone change from R-1D:LHP to C-2:LHP for a portion of the parking lot parcel, 4) conversion of an existing fine dining restaurant into a smaller fine dining restaurant on the first floor and office space on the second floor, 5) two new detached commercial buildings, 6) modification to the exterior of the existing commercial building, and 7) conversion of the existing parking lot which fronts on Wilder Avenue to a residential lot, on properties zoned C-2:LHP and R-1D:LHP. No significant environmental impacts have been identified as a result of this project, and a Mitigated Negative Declaration is recommended. APN 510-17-065 and 071 PROPERTY OWNER: Santa Cruz Wilder, LLC APPLICANT: John Lien TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE PLANNING DIRECTOR: (Planning Division) 1. APPROVAL: The approval was modified to only include the exterior changes to the existing building, relocation of the trash enclosure and the new parking spaces on the west side of Victory Lane. The new proposed buildings and the parking on the east side of Victory Lane were not approved. This application shall be completed in accordance with all of the conditions of approval listed below and in substantial compliance with the approved plans. Any changes or modifications made to the approved plans shall be approved by the Planning Commission, Development Review Committee, Director of Community Development or the Historic Preservation Committee, depending on the scope of the change(s). 2. EXPIRATION: Zoning approval will expire two years from the approval date pursuant to Section 29.20.320 of the Town Code, unless the approval has been vested. 3. GENERAL: All existing trees shown to remain on the plan and newly planted trees are specific subjects of approval of this plan and must remain on site. 4. PROTECTIVE FENCING: Prior to any construction or building permits being issued, the applicant shall meet with the Parks Superintendent concerning the need for protective fencing around the existing trees. Such fencing is to be ATTACMENT 15 installed prior to, and be maintained during, construction. The fencing shall be a four foot high chain link attached to steel poles driven two feet into the ground when at the dripline of the tree. If the fence has to be within eight feet of the trunk of the tree, a fence base may be used, as in a typical chain link fence that is rented. 5. *ARBOR RESOURCES: All recommendations made by Arbor Resources (September 21, 2007) (relating to the project as modified) shall be implemented to eliminate or minimize the construction-related impacts on the trees to be retained. Recommendations are listed under Section 4.0, recommendations of the arborist's report. These include recommendations under the Design Guidelines section (addressing tree location mapping, protective fencing, building setback, trenching, drainage facilities, and installation of new trees) and the Protection Measures Before and During Construction section (addressing fencing, removal of hardscape, demolition, work within tree canopies, etc). The report's recommendations are included as Attachment 2 of the Initial Study. 6. ARBORIST REQUIREMENTS: The developer shall implement, at their cost, all recommendations noted above (relating to the project as modified). A Compliance Memorandum shall be prepared and submitted with the building permit application detailing how the recommendations have or will be addressed. These recommendations must be incorporated in the building pen-nit plans, and completed prior to issuance of a building permit where applicable. (Building Division) 7. PERMITS REQUIRED: A building permit shall be required for the alteration of the existing structure, and the parking lot improvements. Separate permits are required for electrical, mechanical, and plumbing work as necessary. 8. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: The Conditions of Approval must be blue-lined in full on the cover sheet of the construction plans. A Compliance Memorandum shall be prepared and submitted with the building permit application detailing how the Conditions of Approval will be addressed. 9. SIZE OF PLANS: For sets of construction plans, maximum size 24" x 36." 10. CODES: Projects will be required to conform to the 2007 California Building, Fire, Mechanical, Electrical, and Plumbing Codes. The California Codes are based on model codes; 2006 International Building Code and Fire Code and 2006 Uniform Plumbing and Mechanical Codes and the 2005 National Electrical Code. 11. TITLE 24 - COMMERCIAL: The proposed tenant improvements, will require upgrades to comply with the latest California Title 24 Accessibility Standards. Necessary work shall be first investigated by the design architect, then confirmed by Town staff. 12. SPECIAL INSPECTIONS: When a special inspection is required by UBC Section 1701, the architect or engineer of record shall prepare an inspection program that shall be submitted to the Building Official for approval prior to issuance of the building pen-nit. The Town Special Inspection form must be completely filled-out, signed by all requested parties, and be blue-lined on the construction plans. Special Inspection forms are available from the Building Division Service Counter or online at www.losgatosca.gov/building 13. NONPOINT SOURCE POLLUTION STANDARDS SHEET: The Town standard Santa Clara County Valley Nonpoint Source Pollution Control Program Sheet (or Clean Bay Sheet 2406) shall be part of the plan submittal as the second page. The specification sheet is available at the Building Division Service Counter for a fee of $2 or at San Jose Blue Print for a fee. 14. PLANS: The construction plans shall be prepared under the direct supervision of a licensed architect or engineer. (Business and Professionals Code Section 5538) 15. APPROVALS REQUIRED: The project requires the following departments and agencies approval before issuing a building permit: A. Community Development -Planning Division: Sandy Bally at 354-6873 B. Engineering/Parks & Public Works Department: Fletcher Parsons at 395- 3460 C. Santa Clara County Fire Department: (408) 378-4010 D. Environmental Health Department: (408) 885-4200 16. *ARCHAELOGICAL: In the event archaeological traces are encountered, all construction within a 50 meter radius of the find shall be halted, the Director of Community Development shall be notified and an archaeologist shall be retained to examine the find and make appropriate recommendations. 17. *NATIVE AMERICAN REMAINS: If human remains are discovered, the Santa Clara County Coroner shall immediately be notified. The Coroner will determine whether or not the remains were Native American. If the Coroner determines that the remains are not subject to his or her authority, the Coroner shall notify the Native American Heritage Commission, who would attempt to identify descendants of the deceased Native American. 18. *ARCHAEOLOGICAL FIND: If the Director of Community Development finds that the archaeological find is not a significant resource, work will resume only after the submittal of a preliminary archaeological report and after provision for reburial and ongoing monitoring are accepted. Provisions for identifying descendants of a deceased Native American and for reburial will follow the protocol set forth in Section 15064.5 of the CEQA Guidelines. If the site is found to be a significant archaeological site, a mitigation program must be prepared and submitted to the Director of Community Development for consideration and approval, in confonnance with the protocol set forth in Public Resources Code Section 21083.2. 19. *FINAL ARCHAEOLOGICAL REPORT: A final report shall be prepared at the applicant's cost when a find is determined to be a significant archaeological site and/or when Native American remains are found on the site. The final report shall include background information on the completed work, a description and list of identified resources, the disposition and curation of these resources, any testing, other recovered information, and conclusions. 20. *LEAD-BASED PAINT: A state certified lead-based paint professional shall be retained to perfonn a lead-based paint survey of the existing structures and the recommendations of the professional shall be followed for abatement of any identified lead-based paint prior to renovation of the structure. TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE DIRECTOR OF PARKS AND PUBLIC WORKS: (Engineering Division) 21. GENERAL: All public improvements shall be made according to the latest adopted Town Standard Drawings and the Town Standard Specifications. All work shall conform to the applicable Town ordinances. The adjacent public right- of-way shall be kept clear of all job related dirt and debris at the end of the day. Dirt and debris shall not be washed into storm drainage facilities. The storing of goods and materials on the sidewalk and/or the street will not be allowed unless a special permit is issued. The developer's representative in charge shall be at the job site during all working hours. Failure to maintain the public right-of-way according to this condition may result in the Town performing the required maintenance at the developer's expense. 22. ENCROACHMENT PERMIT: All work in the public right-of-way will require a Construction Encroachment Permit. All work over $5,000 will require construction security. 23. PUBLIC WORKS INSPECTIONS: The developer or his representative shall notify the Engineering Inspector at least twenty-four (24) hours before starting any work pertaining to on-site drainage facilities, grading or paving, and all work in the Town's right-of-way. Failure to do so will result in rejection of work that went on without inspection. 24. CONSTRUCTION STREET PARKING: Any reservation of street parking shall be coordinated with the Police Department. Contractors shall not use public parking unless previously arranged through the Police and Engineering Departments. 25. SITE DRAINAGE: Rainwater leaders shall be discharged to splash blocks. No through curb drains will be allowed. 26. NPDES: On-site drainage systems shall include a filtration device such as a bio- swale or permeable pavement. 27. SILT AND MUD IN PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY: It is the responsibility of contractor and home owner to make sure that all dirt tracked into the public right- of-way is cleaned up on a daily basis. Mud, silt, concrete and other construction debris SHALL NOT be washed into the Town's storm drains. 28. RESTORATION OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS: The developer shall repair or replace all existing improvements not designated for removal that are damaged or removed because of developer's operations. Improvements such as, but not limited to: curbs, gutters, sidewalks, driveways, signs, pavements, raised pavement markers, thermoplastic pavement markings, etc. shall be repaired and replaced to a condition equal to or better than the original condition. Existing improvement to be repaired or replaced shall be at the direction of the Engineering Construction Inspector, and shall comply with all Title 24 Disabled Access provisions. Developer shall request a walk-through with the Engineering Construction Inspector before the start of construction to verify existing conditions. 29. SIDEWALK REPAIR: The developer shall repair and replace to existing Town standards any sidewalk damaged now or during construction of this project. Sidewalk repair shall match existing color, texture and design, and shall be constructed per Town Standard Details. The limits of sidewalk repair will be determined by the Engineering Construction Inspector during the construction phase of the project. 30. CURB AND GUTTER: The developer shall repair and replace to existing Town standards any curb and gutter damaged now or during construction of this project. New curb and gutter shall be constructed per Town Standard Details. The limits of curb and gutter repair will be determined by the Engineering Construction Inspector during the construction phase of the project. 31. SANITARY SEWER LATERAL: Sanitary sewer laterals are televised by West Valley Sanitation District and approved by the Town of Los Gatos before they are used or reused. Install a sanitary sewer lateral clean-out at the property line. 32. SANITARY SEWER BACKWATER VALVE: Drainage piping serving fixtures which have flood level rims less than twelve (12) inches (304.8 mm) above the elevation of the next upstream manhole and/or flushing inlet cover at the public or private sewer system serving such drainage piping shall be protected from backflow of sewage by installing an approved type backwater valve. Fixtures above such elevation shall not discharge through the backwater valve, unless first approved by the Administrative (Sec. 6.50.025). The Town shall not incur any liability or responsibility for damage resulting from a sewer overflow where the property owner or other person has failed to install a backwater valve, as defined section 103(e) of the Uniform Plumbing Code adopted by section 6.50.010 of the Town Code and maintain such device in a functional operating condition. Evidence of West Valley Sanitation District's decision on whether a backwater device is needed shall be provided prior to issuance of a building permit. 33. OUTDOOR TRASH ENCLOSURES: Outdoor trash enclosures shall be covered and area drains connected to the sanitary sewer system shall be provided. Temporary trash enclosures are exempt from this condition. 34. GREASE TRAPS: Meet all requirement of the Santa Clara County Health Department and West Valley Sanitation District for the interception, separation or pretreatment of effluent. 35. CONSTRUCTION NOISE: Between the hours of 8:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m., weekdays and 9:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. weekends and holidays, construction, alteration or repair activities shall be allowed. No individual piece of equipment shall produce a noise level exceeding eighty-five (85) dBA at twenty-five (25) feet. If the device is located within a structure on the property, the measurement shall be made at distances as close to twenty-five (25) feet from the device as possible. The noise level at any point outside of the property plane shall not exceed eighty-five (85) dBA. 36. GOOD HOUSEKEEPING: Good housekeeping practices shall be observed at all times during the course of construction. Superintendence of construction shall be diligently performed by a person or persons authorized to do so at all times during working hours. The storing of goods and/or materials on the sidewalk and/or the street will not be allowed unless a special permit is issued by the Engineering Division. 37. TRUCKING and UNLOADING: Trucking and unloading shall be coordinated with the Engineering inspector. Haul routes, temporary blocking of parking or streets, and delivery times shall be coordinated with the Engineering inspector. 38. *GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION: A geotechnical investigation shall be conducted for this project to detennine the potential for surface fault rupture on the site. The geotechnical study shall provide recommendations for site grading as well as the design of foundations, retaining walls, concrete slab-on-grade construction, excavation, drainage, on-site utility trenching and pavement sections. The project shall incorporate all recommendations of the investigation into project plans (not applicable since new buildings were not approved). TO THE SATISFACTION OF SANTA CLARA COUNTY FIRE 39. FIRE FLOW: Buildings requiring a fire flow in excess of 2,000 GPM shall be protected throughout by an automatic fire sprinkler system, hydraulically designed per National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) Standard #13. 40. PLAN SUBMITTAL: A State of California licensed fire protection contractor shall submit plans, calculations, a completed permit application and appropriate fees to this department for review and approval prior to beginning their work. 41. PREMISE IDENTIFICATION: Approved numbers or addresses shall be placed on existing buildings in such a position as to be plainly visible and legible from the street or road fronting the property. Numbers shall contrast with their background. *Required as a Mitigation Measure N:ADEV\C0NDITNS\2008\nsc I15.a&s.2.doc February 27, 2007 HPC meeting minutes ITEM 3: 122 N. SANTA CRUZ AVENUE The Committee considered plans to install an awning on a pre-1941 commercial building. Cowan moved to recommend approval of the application to the Development Review Committee. Pacheco seconded, motion passed unanimously. ITEM 4: 33 WALNUT AVENUE Pacheco stated for the record that he lives within 500 feet of this parcel and therefore recused himself from the meeting. The Committee considered a request to interpret whether or not the work proposed to a pre-1941 single family residence classifies as a demolition. Micciche moved to find that the rear portion of the house was an addition which is unsympathetic to the architectural style of the original house. Therefore, the removal of this addition would not be classified as a demolition pursuant to Town Code. Burch seconded, motion passed unanimously. Pacheco returned to the meeting. ITEM 5: 222 NICHOLSON AVENUE Cowan stated for the record that he lives within 500 feet of this parcel and therefore recused himself from the meeting. The Committee considered plans to add onto a single family residence with reduced setbacks on a nonconforming lot in the Almond Grove Historic District. Pacheco moved to recommend approval of the application to the Development Review Committee with the following conditions: 1. The arch over the garage door shall be redesigned to a flat design. 2. The garage door shall be a simple design with no windows. 3. The skylights shall be pushed back to the rear of the garage roof and shall be a flat rectangular design. Micciche seconded, motion passed unanimously. Cowan returned to the meeting. ITEM 6: 115 N. SANTA CRUZ AVENUE The Committee considered plans to construct two new detached commercial buildings and to modify the exterior of the existing commercial building on properties zoned C-2:LHP and R-1D:LHP. Pacheco moved to continue the matter with the following directions: ATTACHMENT 16 I . Increase the opening to the site from N. Santa Cruz Avenue by adjusting the southern building. 2. Provide a color and material board. 3. Adjust the front fencing so that it curves into the plaza area to make it more inviting. 4. Look at alternatives to screen the stairs to the upper floor of the historic structure which can include a trellis or landscaping. 5. The southern building shall maintain its rounded corner which softens the building. 6. The new buildings do not have to be symmetrical. Micciche seconded, motion passed unanimously. The Committee stated that they endorsed the concept that the paved parking lot on Wilder Avenue be eliminated and replaced with a residence which will be more in keeping with the historic neighborhood. ITEM 7: OTHER BUSINESS a. Pre-1941 Design Guidelines Update - Baily informed the Committee on the status of the Draft Guidelines. b. Workshop overview - Burch, Pacheco and Baily discussed the workshop. c. Appointment of new Chair and Vice-Chair - Micciche moved to maintain the existing Chair and Vice-Chair. Sayoc seconded, motion passed unanimously. ITEM 8: APPROVAL OF MINUTES The minutes from the meeting of January 17, 2007 were approved. ITEM 9: STATUS OF PREVIOUS APPLICATIONS Baily informed the Committee on the status of previous applications. ITEM 10: ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned at 8:00 P.M. to the next regularly scheduled meeting of March 21, 2007. N:ADEV\HPCminutes\2007\2-27-07.DOC Prepared by: March 21, 2007 HPC meeting minutes ITEM 3: 17020 WILD WAY The Committee considered plans to determine whether or not the work proposed to a pre-1941 single family residence meets the Pre-1941 Design Guidelines. Pacheco moved to find that the work proposed met the guidelines. Cowan seconded, motion passed unanimously. ITEM 4: 57 FAIRVIEW PLAZA The Committee considered a request of an addition that will exceed the allowable FAR on property in the Fairview Plaza Historic District. Burch moved to find that the addition was consistent with the guidelines of the historic district and recommended approval of the application in terms of architecture only. Pacheco seconded, motion passed unanimously. ITEM 5: 115 N. SANTA CRUZ AVENUE The Committee reconsidered plans to construct two new detached commercial buildings and to modify the exterior of the existing commercial building on properties zoned C-2:LHP and R- 1D:LHP. Pacheco moved that the application should proceed to the next step with the following comments: 1. Two detached structures are acceptable. 2. The southern structure should be redesigned to be more subservient (regarding style, scale and mass), to the mansion. 3. Consider a more transparent building. 4. The context of the mansion shall be protected. 5. The proposed exterior staircase on the mansion is recommended for approval. Burch seconded, motion passed unanimously. ITEM 6: OTHER BUSINESS a. 139 Tait Avenue - Cowan stated for the record that he lives within 500 feet of the subject parcel and recused himself from the meeting. The Committee considered preliminary plans to connect two existing accessory structures along the alley. The Committee expressed no concerns with the connection. Cowan returned to the meeting. b. Pre-1941 Design Guidelines Update - Baily inforined the Committee on the status of the guidelines. c. HPC application coversheets - The Committee discussed what they would like to see in the coversheets. ATTACHMENT 17 September 19, 2007 HPC meeting minutes 2. An architectural element, lattice garden structure similar to the design that currently exists, or other feature should be added at the front elevation at the largest expanse of the wall to break up the wall. This action is an interpretation and is not appealable. ITEM 3: 115 N. SANTA CRUZ AVENUE The Committee considered revised plans to construct two new detached commercial buildings and to modify the exterior of the existing commercial building on property located in the Commercial Historic District. Burch moved that their previous direction to proceed to the next step with the following comments were still applicable: Two detached structures are acceptable. 2. The southern structure should be redesigned to be more subservient (regarding style, scale and mass), to the mansion. 3. Consider a more transparent building. 4. The context of the mansion shall be protected. 5. The proposed exterior staircase on the mansion is recommended for approval Pacheco seconded, motion passed unanimously. ITEM 4: OTHER BUSINESS a. 114 Whitney Avenue - Representative was not present. No discussion. b. 46/48 Broadway - The Committee considered preliminary plans to restore a single family residence. The Committee was very favorable with the proposed changes. The Committee commented that the elongated character of the windows should be maintained. Architectural detailing and building materials will also be important to include on the plans. Cowan recused himself from the next item since he lives within 500 feet of the property. c. 146 Tait Avenue - The Committee considered preliminary plans to add onto and remodel a single family residence. The Committee expressed concern with the bulk and mass. Cowan returned to the meeting. d. 130 Massol Avenue- The Committee discussed ideas for an addition to a single family residence. The Committee stated that the house was well preserved and was the most original folk Victorian style house on the street. Possible meeting date change for the October meeting - Item dropped. ATTACUMNT 18 Dear Town Council, Please uphold the Planning Commission's denial of the Coggshell Mansion project which would add two structures in front of the mansion. The Planning Commission followed through on their responsibility to protect our town treasure. I hope the Town Council will follow their lead. It is the responsibility of our elected officials to ensure that future, as well as present, citizens can enjoy the full beauty of the Coggshell Mansion. Sincerely, at y An erson 17670 Foster Rd. Los Gatos MAR 03 2006 MAYOR & TOWN COUNCIL ATTACHMENT 19 FYI" W1 E f R 2 x®08 'ATOS CLERK DEz)ART MEN T March 25, 2008 The Honorable Barbara Spector, Mayor Town of Los Gatos 110 East Main Stret Subject: Peer Review of Initial Study ND-07-10 Historic Coggeshall Mansion 115 N. Santa Cruz Avenue Dear Mayor Spector and Members of the Town Council: Attached is the peer review I requested Archives and Architecture prepare for the Coggeshall Mansion. Please accept this as a formal request to enter this report into the official public record on this project. If you have any questions please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, Lee Quintana 5 Palm Avenue Los Gatos, California 95030 (408) 354-7808 cc: Bud Lortz, Director of Community Development Greg Larsen, Town Manager Sandy Baily, Planner ATTACHMENT 20 A R C H I V E S fV A 12 C H Heritage Resource Partners, `I' E C T U R E L L C PO Box 1332 San Jose CA 95109-1332 408.369.5683 VOX 408,228,0782 FAX March 7, 2008 Ms. Lee Quintana 5 Palm Avenue Los Gatos, CA 95030 RE: Third party review / Initial Study - Cultural Resources Historic Coggeshall Mansion (115 N. Santa Cruz Avenue, Los Gatos, CA) Dear Ms. Quintana: This letter constitutes an independent third party review of the cultural resources information provided in the Initial Study related to the currently proposed project at the Historic Coggeshall Mansion site, located at 115 North Santa Cruz Avenue in downtown Los Gatos. We were asked to review the documents that constitute the Initial Study, prepared by the Town of Los Gatos, for consistency with California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines for Implementation Preliminary Review of Projects and Conduct of Initial ,Study, as they pertain to the evaluation and consideration of historic resources within the development review process. We understand that the project proposed for the property includes construction of two new buildings, modifications to the landscaping of the property, and alterations to the main building (Coggeshall Mansion). The documents we reviewed include the following: • Landmark Designation Form, dated October 22, 1975. • Initial Study, prepared by Geier & Geier Consulting, Inc, dated December 2007 • Mitigation Monitoring Plan, dated January 16, 2008. • Planning Commission Staff Report, dated January 23, 2008 • A Recommendation for Tree Removal at the Trevese Restaurant Los Gatos, prepared by Barrie D. Coate, July 24, 2007 This review was performed by Franklin Maggi and Leslie A.G. Dill, both Architectural Historians and Partners of the firm of Archives & Architecture: Heritage Resource Partners, LLC. Both of us meet the Secretary of the Interior's qualification standards to perform identification, evaluation, registration, and treatment activities in our field, in compliance with state and federal environmental laws as outlined in 36CFR Part 61.We were contacted in early February regarding the preparation of this independent review, and were authorized to proceed on February 6, 2008. www. archivesandarchitecture.com Leslie Dill conducted a reconnaissance of the site and setting in February 2008, but did not physically access the site to conduct a detailed review of the existing building on the property. This review is based primarily on the information provided in the above-referenced reports. No intensive-level supplemental research on the property was conducted- Historic Significance Coggeshall Mansion is recognized as a historic resource by the Town, is a Historic Landmark (1113-75-6) in an LHP Overlay Zone and is identified as such in the Initial Study and related documents. This is in keeping with CEQA guidelines that state: "...resources which are listed in a local historic register or deemed significant in a historical resource survey as provided under Section 5024.1(g) are to be presumed historically or culturally significant unless `the preponderance of evidence' demonstrates they are not." http://www.ceres.ca.gov/topic%nv law/cega/more/tas/page3.html. The recordation of this property completed in 1975 is not consistent with current standards as commonly prepared by cultural resource professionals. in California. The 1970s designation form description is limited, and provides little information for use in the developmental review process. Although that form was considered adequate at the time for landmark nomination, California Department of Parks and Recreation 523 forms (DPR523 forms) are used today as the standard recording format throughout the state. DPR523 forms are based on Instructions for Recording Historical Resources, developed by the State Office of Historic Preservation, and their use maintains a standard recording procedure intended to provide a consistent system for documenting the full range of historical values present in a given location. The DPR523 forms are designed to meet a wide range of needs for information about historical resources to allow for informed decisions on projects that might affect historic resources. Reasonable discretion is allowed in determining what level of information is necessary, based on a particular user's needs and the relative value of the resources that are being documented. The Instructions for Recording Historical Resources recommends: "The minimum level of documentation [DPRa, Primary Record form] is designed to provide an initial record for all types of resources... However, it is important to emphasize that the Primary Record (and a Location Map when required) is strictly non- evaluative and constitutes the minimum documentation needed to include a record in OHP's filing system. Professional surveys conducted in connection with planned development projects should generally record all but the very simplest resources with a Primary Record, Location Map, and an appropriate detailed recording form or forms (e.g., BSO Record, Archaeological Site Record, and District Record)." (Emphasis original to the document. California Office of Historic Preservation, March 1995 / www.ohp.parks. ca.gov/pages/1054/files/manual95.~df). Most jurisdictions utilize this higher level of recording information as a part of the process of understanding the significance of a historic property when considering projects that might affect the integrity of historic resources. Within the context of environmental review, the information provided in DPR forms and other intensive reports is relied upon by the agency, to provide A R C H I V E S 0 A R C B I T E C T U R E appropriate design review, to prepare an Initial Study or other type of environmental documentation, and to make determinations as to potential environmental effects that might result from a proposed project. Without this level of documentation, the character-defining features, associations, and integrity of the historic resource, along with its historic context, may not be fully understood by the decision makers during their discretionary review of a proposed project. Project Review Under CEQA, a project involving a historic resource must meet the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties (Standards) for there to be no impacts. The design review of the project involving the Coggeshall Mansion site does not specifically utilize the Standards or work within a local framework consistent with the Standards. The Standards are understood to be a common set of guidelines for the review of historic properties and are used in California as a part of the environmental review process to determine the potential impact of a project on an identified resource. The Initial Study by Geier & Geier Consulting, Inc., includes a design review that utilizes aesthetic standards (e.g., "[adding] liveliness to the street" and "maintain good visual exposure for the original historic portion of the house"). This design review does not address historic design review embodied in the Standards, including such review criteria as: "The historic character of a property shall be retained and preserved. The removal of historic materials or alteration of features, spaces, and spatial relationships that characterize a property will be avoided." (Standard 2) "Distinctive materials, features, finishes, and construction techniques or examples of craftsmanship that characterize a property will be preserved." (Standard 5) and "New additions, exterior alterations or related new construction will not destroy historic materials, features, and spatial relationships that characterize the property. The new work shall be differentiated from the old and will be compatible with the historic materials, features, size, scale and proportion, and massing to protect the integrity of the property and its environment." (Standard 9) (Secretary of the Interior's Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties, http://www.Us.,_gov/histor,~/hps/tps/standguide~ We have not conducted a formal Standards Review of the proposed project; however, with only a cursory review of the project in relation to the Initial Study documents, we find that inadequate consideration has been given in the Initial Study analysis to the retention of historic materials and of the potential impact that the project may have on the historic setting. Furthermore, design review needs to address all aspects of any proposed project as a whole-the decisions should not be undertaken piecemeal, as the cumulative impact(s) of the various alterations need to be evaluated together. For the Town of Los Gatos to issue a Negative Declaration for the project, A Q C 11 1 V E S 0 A R C H I T E C. T U R E they should rely upon a clear Standards analysis of the project to ensure that the historic resource is not impacted by the proposed project. Tree Removal CEQA and the Secretary's Standards include the setting of a historic resource as part of that resource. The Initial Study evaluates the removal of a number of trees within the "Biological Resources" section of the report, but does not address the loss of these trees on the setting of the Coggeshall Mansion. The setting of the mansion is identified as a representation of the early residential character of North Santa Cruz Avenue, and the landscaping of the parcel must be considered as part of the Standards review. The removal of the trees could possibly pose an impact under the Cultural Resources section of the Initial Study, and analysis must be included in that section of the study. Leslie Dill recalls that the two redwood trees were planted within the last twenty years, as mitigation for the loss of a pair of historically significant monkey-puzzle trees (araucaria araucana) that died in a severe winter. The removal of one of the trees would, therefore, appear to impact negatively the historic setting unless the trees are replaced with another pair of large-scale evergreens that provide the same symmetrical, large-scale landscape setting as the historic monkey-puzzle trees. The other trees have not been identified specifically within the documentation forms or through other documentation efforts (therefore underlining the inadequacy of the original nomination), and their removal can not be adequately addressed in the Initial Study as necessary until their historic character is established. Please do not hesitate to contact us with any comments or questions. Sincerely: Franklin Maggi Architectural Historian A R C H I V E S & A R C H I T E C T U Q E Aofttk (14,09 GEIER GEIER CONSULTING, INC. January 31, 2008 Ms. Sandy Baily Town of Los Gatos Community Development Department 110 East Main Street Los Gatos, CA 95030 Subject: 115 North Santa Cruz Avenue and 112 Wilder Avenue Initial Study Dear Sandy: We have prepared and forwarded an Errata Sheet for the above referenced Initial Study (IS). The two corrections required for the document only affect the form of the document and have no bearing on the substance, content or conclusions of the Initial Study. It appears that the Planning Commission has question(s) regarding the implications of potential re-design of one of the proposed project buildings. The Initial Study evaluated the addition of two new buildings to the project site and found that the "introduction of two new commercial buildings on the grounds of the project site would be considered to have a less-than-significant impact on the aesthetic character of the property." This is based on the findings of the BPC as referenced on page 7 of the IS. The Aesthetics section of the IS includes no mitigation measures since no significant impacts were identified. Since we found no significant effects resulting from the currently proposed design, any subsequent design changes reducing the footprint, mass, scale, etc. of the proposed building per BPC directions would have lesser impacts than the currently proposed design. Potential impacts from reductions in building scale would still be less than significant and require no further environmental review or new mitigation measures. Under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, a revision and re-circulation of the IS/MND is only necessary if there are "substantial changes" requiring "major revisions" to the project due to new significant impacts or increased severity of identified impacts (Guidelines Section 15162). Since those conditions would not apply to potential reductions in the scale of this project, there would be no reason to revise and re-circulate the IS. If the Town wishes to require a re-design of the southern structure as recommended by the BPC, including reduction of mass and scale and/or change in style, then an Addendum (Guidelines Section 15164) would be the most appropriate course for further clarification. An Addendum would not require a public review period or a public hearing. If you have any other questions, please feel free to call me at your convenience. Sincerely, Fritz Geier ATTACHMENT I P.(). Box 5054 • U'crkc1cy, CA 99705-5054 570.644_2535 • 510.644.2534 rn:i ~ w«-w.~eiercrrnsultita~.cu~n ERRATA SHEET FOR 115 NORTH SANTA CRUZ AVENUE AND 112 WILDER AVENUE INITIAL STUDY JANUARY 31, 2008 ERRATA SHEET INITIAL STUDY FOR 115 NORTH SANTA CRUZ AVENUE AND 112 WILDER AVENUE LOS GATOS, CALIFORNIA The following changes should be made in the Initial Study dated December 2007 (added text is underlined): Title Page: The project's Architecture and Site application number should be added to the project cover sheet as follows: 115 NORTH SANTA CRUZ AVENUE AND 112 WILDER AVENUE LOS GATOS, CALIFORNIA SUBDIVISION APPLICATION M-07-005 GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT GP-07-01 ZONE CHANGE Z-07-001 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT U-07-020 VARIANCE APPLICATION V-07-01 NEGATIVE DECLARATION ND-07-10 ARCHITECTURE AND SITE APPLICATION S-07-019" Page 1: The project's Architecture and Site application number should be added to the applications listed under Item 1, Project Title as follows: "l. Project Title: 115 North Santa Cruz Avenue and 112 Wilder Avenue Subdivision Application M-07-005, General Plan Amendment GP-07-01, Zone Change Z-07-001, Conditional Use Permit U-07-020, Variance Application V-07-01, Negative Declaration ND-07-10, Architecture and Site Application S-07-019." FILING FEES $286.00 Residential $1,149,00 per Commercial, Multi- family or Tentative Map Appeal F4 C1 `i ~V ► 950J63 01 2000 4 lcv~Q- U'D T d r, l Ub ON' 33 - T _1 I, the undersigned, do hereby appeal a decision of the Planning Commission as follows: (PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT NEATLY) (41~/ DATE OF PLANNING COMMISSION DECISION: `~1, t31, t1 At-t~ 2~J .r 2 b0 c~ PROJECT / APPLICATION NO: ~G~> BTU SITir ATe 1-1 i Dn( ADDRESS LOCATION: 115- N • 5A-~~'Pr C ~-2::U G Pursuant to the Town Code, the Town Council may only grant an appeal of a Planning Commission decision in most matters if the Council finds that one of three (3) reasons exist for granting the appeal by a vote of at least three (3) Council members. Therefore, please specify how one of those reasons exist in the appeal: j~ 1. The Planning Commission erred or abused its discretion because ~O Sze- n... 0,.-._, IJn kt C rt_n,t,,-,.1-0 i.rGtB 6a'ff _ «!s~tt..iC a t(n 11. ta- w~wu 5 S .o,, uS--. tkY~ t TVez ~ e ~ SL G`l dY1P J,e cQ a-v-kt k 1 xA, _ 1" lt.~.2 t~F•yt o u s~ ► -C(P-0 ,1cf_V t14&q OR 2. There is new information that was not reasonably available at the time of the Planning Commission decision, which is (please attach the new information if possible): OR 3. The Planning Commission did not have discret otf modify or address the following policy or issue that is vested in the Town IF MORE SPACE IS NEEDED, PLEASE ATTACH ADDITIONAL SHEETS. IMPORTANT: 1. Appellant is responsible for fees for transcription of minutes. A $500.00 deposit is required at the time of filing. 2. Appeal must be filed within ten (10) calendar days of Planning Commission Decision accompanied by the required filing fee. Deadline is 5:00 p.m, on the IO`a day following the decision. If the 1011 day is a Saturday, Sunday, or Town holiday, then it may be filed on the workday immediately following the 10' day, usually a Monday, 3. The Town Clerk will set the hearing withing 56 days of the date of the Planning Commission Decision (Town Ordinance No. 196'7) 4. An appeal regarding a Change of Zone application or a subdivision map only must be filed within the time limit specified in the Zoning or Subdivision Code, as applicable, which is different from other appeals. 5. Once filed, the appeal will be heard by the Town Council. 6. If the reason for granting an appeal is the receipt of new information, the application will usu lly be returned to the Planning Commission for reconsideration. PRINT NAME: ',A ± )TA- CR J SIGNATURE: DATE, r'i' r f 2 6 0 ADDRESS: 4 3 222 PHONE: c OFFICIAL USE ONLY DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: t °~-Yr'S `,1 • f'a CONFIRMATION LETTER SENT: Date: Pending Plannin `Dep meat Confirmatioll TO APPLICANT & APPELLANT BY: s L.. V t DATE TO SEND PUBLICATION:? DATE OF PUBLICATION: N:iDF-V\FORMS\Planning\Planning Com fission Appcal,wpd Revised July L, 2007 Town of Los Gatos C Office of the Town Cl 110 E. Main St., Los Gatos i APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMI ATTACHMENT 2 Appeal of Planning Commission Decision - January 23, 2008 (Amended) 115 North Santa Cruz Avenue • Application 5-07-019 - Architecture and Site Approval • Application U-07-020 - Conditional Use Permit • Application ND-07- Negative Declaration Application S-07-019 - Architecture and Site Approval The Planning Commission considered, as part of the application, a proposal to add two smaller retail structures on the site adjacent to North Santa Cruz Avenue, as well as three parking spaces (accessible from the rear alley) and an exit stair from the second floor of the principal building, on its north side. The Commission voted to approve the addition of the new stair, but to deny the proposed retail buildings and parking spaces. The applicant seeks relief from this decision because it believes the Planning Commission may have erred in its decision, based on the General Plan, and may have abused its discretion, based on the Town Code. Town Code Requirements • The application may not have even required Architectural and Site Approval because the proposal did not contemplate either the construction of a new principal building on the site, or the intensification of land use, as it is defined. Moreover, the proposed alteration to the existing commercial building was, and is, minor (Section 29.20.145). • The purpose of Architectural and Site Approval is to "regulate height, width, shape, proportion, siting, exterior construction and design of buildings to insure that they are architecturally compatible with their surroundings" (Section 29.20.140(d)). The Commission did not even discuss such design issues in its deliberations. Indeed the Chair initiated the discussion by suggesting, and the Members agreed by a show of hands, that the matter under consideration was not a design issue at all, but rather one of land use. • There was no discussion, or apparent consideration, given to any of the relevant matters prescribed in Section 29.20.150 such as site layout, exterior architectural design, lighting or drainage. • Outright denial of the proposal seems unreasonable, whereas Section 29.20.160 calls for a standard of reasonableness. General Plan Considerations Moreover, the application is consistent with many of the policies expressed in the General Plan of the Town of Los Gatos, yet the evidence on that subject was certainly not discussed, and perhaps not even considered, by Commission members. By way of example: The Land Use Element actually defines the CBD as a designation which "encourages a mixture of small town style merchants" and "integrates new construction with structures of historical or architectural significance and emphasizes the importance of the pedestrian". The two small retail buildings which are proposed, at 1,126 and 424 square feet, are entirely suitable for the needs of small merchants. The intimate pedestrian plaza, to be created in the forecourt of the historic mansion, and framed by the proposed retail buildings, will create a destination - and public oasis - for pedestrians. In contrast, the existing private grounds are very inaccessible, almost intimidating. L.P.1.1 articulates a policy that "development shall be of high quality design and construction (and) shall enhance the character and unique identity of existing commercial... neighborhoods". While the applicant believes that the proposal meets, or exceeds, these high standards there was no discussion of the merits of the design. • Importantly, L.P.6.1 encourages the "preservation, restoration, rehabilitation, reuse and maintenance of existing buildings". A substantial motivation of the applicant - and consequence of the development as proposed - is to create economic viability for the restoration and preservation of the historic Coggeshall Mansion, insuring that it remains a relevant contributor to the unique environment of downtown Los Gatos. That work has been started, with significant interior renovations, repairs to the roof, windows, floors and stairs, and extensive improvements to the air conditioning, electrical and plumbing systems. It's not clear that the Planning Commission even superficially considered the economic benefits of this comprehensive proposal. • Policy CD.P.3.2 and 3.7 respectively, encourage "adaptive reuse of commercial ....buildings" and "new structures within historic areas ...designed to blend and harmonize with the neighborhood". These polices are squarely addressed by the applicant's proposal, but even that evidence was not considered during the Planning Commission hearing. The Director of Community Development, writing on page 4 of the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the project states that "..introduction of the two new commercial buildings on the grounds of the project site would be considered to have a less-than- significant impact on the aesthetic character of the property". Indeed, the Historic Preservation Committee considered the project on three separate occasions and determined "that the development of two detached structures would be acceptable for the project site" - and made three recommendations for refinement of the final design. The applicant struggles to identify any aspect of the proposal which is at odds with either a goal, or policy, of the General Plan. There are two policies, however, which appear to create a degree of tension by encouraging development which, at the same time, will "preserve and promote existing commercial centers..." (L.P.1.4) and "preserve and protect historic structures..." (L.P.l .9). The applicant believes that the Planning Commission erred by too narrowly considering that any impact on the visibility of the 2 historic mansion - from any angle and to whatever degree - trumped all other land use policies and community benefits. Not the least of these would be that the historic structure itself would be repaired, sustained and made more accessible to the public as a result of the proposed development. Finally, the Town's Commercial Design Guidelines are "intended to establish a balance that preserves and enhances the Town's livability while supporting the economic vitality that provides the resources for community services The applicant respectively submits that the Commission's decision failed to consider that balance. Application U-07-020 - Conditional Use Permit In order that the overall use of the property would have reduced intensity, with reduced parking requirements, the applicant has proposed to amend the Conditional Use Permit so as to reduce the maximum permitted seating in the fine dining restaurant from 198 to 13 5. The Planning Commission approved the proposed amendment - without approving other significant elements of the proposal - such as the new retail buildings and the relocation of three parking spaces to the east side of the alley. In the event the Town Council does not grant the applicant's appeal with respect to the Architectural and Site Approval application requested above, applicant respectively requests that the Conditional Use permit be'amended to allow the maximum seating which can be accommodated by the parking which can be provided both on-site and within the Parking Assessment District. Subject to staff confirmation, the applicant estimates that either 6 or 9 additional seats should be permitted in that circumstance. Application ND-07-10- Negative Declaration Because the Commission approved the Mitigated Negative Declaration, in the form presented, but denied parts of the application under Architectural and Site Approval, as described above (namely the two new retail buildings and relocation of three parking spaces) the applicant respectfully asks Town Council to confirm the findings of the Negative Declaration in the context of the complete proposal. Respectfully submitted, Santa Cruz Wilder, LLC Grant Sedgwick, Manager 134 Hernandez Ave, Los Gatos, 95030 (408) 655-9296 FILING FEES $2&6.00 Residential $1,149.00 per Commercial, Multi- family or Tentative Map Appeal 50(D• o c~ dcpo `J' ocs Town of Lo V-ec~"'ice of the T 110 E. Main St., Los 4 D 0 1S t Q 42008 wn Cler rare ~?~?!i?,ATOS CLERK Ds-P'l,RTME l T APPEAL OF PLUG COM MSSION DECISIOI I, the undersigned, do hereby appeal a decision of the Planning Commission as follows: (PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT NEATLY) DATE OF PLANNING COMMISSION DECISION: PROJECT / APPLICATION NO: r ADDRESS LOCATION: 1,45-Al' Pursuant to the Town Code, the Town Council may only grant an appeal of a Pinning Commission decision in most matters if the Council finds that one of three (3) reasons exist for granting the appeal by a vote of.at least three ( Council members. Therefore, please specify bow one of those reasons exist in theappeal: S _ LS 1. The Planning Commission erred or abused its discretion because af. t-1LS fVC 2. There is new information that was not reasonably available at the time of tr Planning Commission decision, which is (please attach the new information if possible): 01 The Planning Commission did not have discretion to modify or address the following policy or issue that is vested in the To, Council: IF MORE SPACE IS NEEDED, PLEASE ATTACH ADDmo NtAL SHEETS. IMPORTANT: I. Appellant is responsible for fees for transcription of minutes. A $500,00 deposit is required at the time of filing. 2. Appeal must be ;filed within ten (10) calendar days of Planning Commission Decision aceornpanied by the required filing fet Deadline is 5:00 p.m, on the 10'' day following the decision, If the 10'day is a Saturday, Sunday, or Town holiday, then it maybe filed on the workday immediately following the 10th day, usually a Monday. 3. The Town Clerk will set the hearing withing 56 days of the date of the Planning Commission Decision (Town Ordinance Nc 1967) 4, An appeal regarding a Change of Zone application or a subdivision map only must be filed within the time limit specified in the Zoning or Subdivision Code, as applicable, which is different from other appeals. S, Once filed, the appeal will be heard by the Town Council. 6. If the reason for granting an appeal is the receipt of new information, the application will usually be returned to the Planning Commission for reconsideration. PRINT NAME: w5 is1 rte SIGNATURE:O DATE: D ~7 Q' ADDRESS: PHONE: OFFICIAL USE ONLY DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: CONFIRMATION LETTER: ATTACHMENT 3 Peridin~,, I'lanaini, Department Confirmation TO APPLICANT & APPELLA1v 1 n x : Appeal of January 23, 2008 Planning Commission action on: • A&S-07-019, • U-07-20 • ND-07-10 • Continuance of remaining applications Project Application Number(s): • Negative Declaration: • Architecture and Site Application: • Conditional Use Permit: • General Plan Amendment: • Zone Change: • Variance Application: • Subdivision Application: ND-07-10 A&S-07-019 U-07-020 GP-07-001 Z-07-001 V-07-01 M-07-005 Address of project: 115 North Santa Cruz Avenue 112 Wilder Avenue Reasons for appeal: • The Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration does not provide adequately analysis of the project's potential impacts to the historic mansion, the site's character or its historic setting. • The ISIMND is not supported by factual evidence. • The project was not considered as a whole as required by CEQA • The IS/MND did not assess potential incremental or cumulative impacts to a historic resource or consider additional mitigation to reduce impacts to a historic resource • A fair argument can be made for an EIR r as as ro si O O as )n .-i si O N a) O O o i 1J O L ri ,S.' b) C N si 11 Z ({f w 4 1 > C 4) 1J a a C m ai 1J r- a) 14 U 1J W IL ro C •.t U •H ,C $ k J H C .i .X U) co ai C C N •J d u a) ro .1 •-i (d ro ro N si o .u to O to r o 1 X - C O •,I .U ro u -r1 ri a a o o l li o o 1 t- O 1 N a) b) C U a) C N ~ 0) a O I r 0 I m C O -1 1J u •,I w O O -ri 1) Id U -,i H a a FC a) U .,.i N > iJ m C -n ro ro w C ri u ~ (d w d U C a) ro -ri N (D cx 1J -1 C a) Q y a 1J O 1-1 rn C H x si Id a O) o C O -H 1J N o a td N 44 x a 2f N C -r4 w to C -H 43 N 1 al C o 1.) u C ro L N a) lr ~i C 3 1J sl o O H w ro C o au N w x N a) C 41 O 11 r O •.i x) •ri u ro C O N )a (L) C o u Rqs rt to li al C G,' a) i (1) ro ,-i 3 o a Q A - I a ro W a ry u -11 w -ri a) C Q) a) q v „S ro m 3 N ri -i .i ro ri O ~i a) 11 O N O ri ro .i ro w w O C N 1 U w O C ro (D L 0 o O r: - .i ro 'A a N 1J C o ro a) Ci o m 1J U rd 3 r1 ro O ri i m 1 O w -4 U) ro O 1 r ° ,5 O N4 a O H L o O JJ O H N " C .14 w a) U w N ol C C A !i w N C.1 ~ w O m o Q G N "J ro w Oi w xi a a r C H a) H N ro 1-1 .i 0 .,i u U -,q k a) a q S y W W C N z i", O ri L C a) N C L .,i E tr) C •.i li C al n3 !i Q r1 O u ro 5 u •TI A N ! O li a > o m al i) 4 O i N w ri O F H N N -a Id A O aJ C 0 U 11 a) N N m a) C aY w m N c4 O .-i a) U H Id O w O •d ro -4 U W O u tT a b7 C C O 1) O to -.i y - U u u .C 11 sa o Z ro U Q -.-i lJ (d b! ro Z ~ t a m m i x F ai C a1-4 3 ,-1 )d )i Q) C v O .4 N 0 C •H 1) z o U N Q ~ O 13 H ro o O U a) i rmi C H r-1 O. w r s1 a) o a) . U a) -qi m b r 4 rd si V o a) U k w' 0) u a1 o o N aS P' 0 01 C -.i X si ro a L -Ci iJ ~ C ro 4) N 4) si o W N m si •.t w a) u . rd a) C U Id 1J U ro 'Li N+ a) .13 1J w U ri yam.) a G -4 U m i K al o ~-i -4 0) Z *a .ri N a~ H r, a) m Ui w m 'i N r) a )n ~o r m m o H N N •-i n H w H v) e-I io .i r H m N m 'i o N .•i N N N rn N )n N N si -ti a3 s) -H • m b ao 4 Q) H w C U-) 0 w 0) C3 -I u to Ln si x U C) Id U) El F U O UI N b M m • oH F Q) N am 4, a) 0 N W id O U y , U) •.-i qq U --li E N .C OO O f ~q'• f d u -14 o hh WF o d I Q u l P4 w rJ o v w rn s) 1~ r a o a si J O O C U U q Q) 0 > A Id m l + FC r-i si v w Q) Q Q N O L} O A O. 1 C H , N ro -H s (3 H N 7 C N N -r N J r a3 a C) 14 u 9 H N r~ v .n e m m o r m o N rn w m a• si CD b N m N N 1 ri .i O G H td U] m H~~--"•• al O U N z U H as 1J D4 H z CD 14 a m °a~ a~ H N •-i ~i s, CD a) o ro O .-1 N -J N N ~ +1 ri r+ O Ci ul m In H N O U N z u H cJ H 1 a a m In O 2 C7 •-i to 0 a a L H ATTACEMENT 4 O a' to .1 ai G a) C f4 U C p 3 )i O !4 C C •,i b) u N A ri al •,t N to .Ni cN.' ti N N O N N U N ri C C O N ri m N 1-1 N W N A U U •.i 7.1 m 2 N r; L ~ N N 27 C O L (d m ul N (d L U ~ N N ro a X N (d b) •.i U ( •'1 N U 4 bl 10 .14 ro •,4 b L H U O W U N O ri a/ > ,i x1 'O ~ O 3 N N Q ro m N ,~.1 L W O C 0 . n ro m d) C .-1 rd t1 C U ..i N P4 N rd O U 0 A .4 b 1a t} 0 O u 0 N rJ 44 H 'O C ro 10 ro a .C 0 11 y •ri~ N N N 4 N 41 Id 0 0 C O Id • i u •rl -4 C N X 00 O A O r-1 •:J O A C ?4 N C 'd a C ,Q N tJ A C o N o N to U) N A i.t )4 o 44 2S N O a 0 la co N °o 10 N rh bl fd C -,4 N .,4 JJ " 4-) O N a) U) .7 IJ C Si 11 171 o r; 0 L ro r3 •,i 11 )i 0 O a ~i u ro .C 4j C 0 p N b Ed u -I rd 11 o -H U a a) N N ri H U O to O 0, ri ~ Ot mm (d 11d6 1-) C O O .-1 .1 ,-1 O li Id qq - H N } C G' N y N u N In o O w 4 u f1 O o 44 O u m N •C l-1 O Li N ro .C 1.1 v m l4 U 0 id d N a x a a H m r, o •.i U 4 rd u N N 1`1 t4 u U) N Id y o )4 a 10 q rtf In bl .i N 0 41 U O U ~ u N ro m ro 9 o u a ~ H C N N 14 ro 0) u N 1a u •H ~ HH! ai ri C O r-i C id li w N 44 U 0 u r-1 m ,A 4 1l )i o w N 1 U O ut a) 0 a) 0 a) j 0. O U m W bl 0 •,i C T) 44 N C U C 1d' N u .,i U) U ri rd q -A C A ro •H O A 1-i m U C rti ~ 11 ro y Li U •Iq u 1.) n -ri .i ~ C O l N li C U u a) N )i m m bl C ,i bl m i c! O N W 'CJ qq m u N N b) C •,i u U) b r1 'd ,i .•-I C A ~1 0 0 .-a 44 rd N r N ltt n •.1 u ° U N O z u H H m N N •,i a L J J O N O ro •,i n v u ro a) •,i 3 r.1 U )-i a1 'O W C C -4 U ro C ri 1-4 N W K 3 O F4 m ro C N N U) ra A U C O •,i W .u (.'r m m H 14 N 7y N ?r L C O Si 4 u •14 7 C C N N N C ri r-i W w a u O t71 ri X m .-i r co _ W ° 2d -4 Ul 4) tx yl `4 U) r. O a 0 S! a N N t3l q .-i d' E-. O 44 4 a) H W N k O A 23 (D -,i 41 rd U i 44 ,i O FS tT r _H y N •,i N m P g m u N 0 4i Cn N u C U u N U 4 U y~ U li N O U 'd a) o U b) C L N -i 14 rd a) 4 U b) r -1 1-1 (d C rA 44 b ai ~ N m N Ul 4 tl w ,C 0 ri $ _ L N N 4 O a A ti o L N N 0 O a) N :j P U 'a L H ) l0 rr-4 N L N W 3 U N ,4' U_ C rd N C Eti d~ U) ro N O a O id a (1) o z C7 ~ to ° .7 Id a N ,C m N •ri Q) Q U a) o m a V) o O P a) b) )i N ri • 0 ro ra 4 U u m 4/ ro N A i ro N N ri x ro a r-- O r) - ro A U 9 ,C N A 10 )i ro 9 Ul H 0) A JJ 10 td C a) B N H L N ..i N N L U X 1d U r-i 0 ri 0 rt3 S: C1 'Lf 3 Id d) )i U 1J )i y d+ m r-i c, -n W 0 0) O U) .C 0 •!i N W a .C m o N O N _ •ri ro O U - Z N r-i •i-{ U u W 4: O N L a ri ro Z $ r 3 ro .-i N N W In l0 r 00 m O , -I N H) sN in b r N Or O ri N l,) ~ iti d) L H rCS • o N ro O rt . C d roro o r+ o ) } -4 m b) N Z r ° *O )n o r ri I c. H U) C., •ri U ro U H a a ro N N Q N a) A 'J H A N N li .O U C N u N O yr U) R,' -i m ,C U N Ui m N ri +1 U •ri 3 C p N b) r N H N 3 U N A O a m li N C A) N 'n N O) W .L; U O O }4 •(dd .C u (d .C 3 a) U al )i U G O •,1 Ui ,H-1 N .-I N U }i a O 3 LA) 0 2 N 4 H O G N y U N 0 U Ul m n U 31 a) U W 4) a. N Ul a) > j C ri o U •ri ro N U Id 4 •H 3 10 N O H a) y d _ U a) ~ 0i U a H ) 4J N A N N 3 w A ) N •Nj N o a r-i O 4 a C _4 -i ro N C. N ) a 0 a m N O 44 q O ri -u y 'd' o (1) ° N -1 M rN „i H H ro a) 41 m b) •ri L i !n 4k Z a 4 u N O r: a) ,C U y }}i 1!{ a) ~4 X •H i 1 _4 3 H 0 m J b N } .-i O r7 •,i 1.1 ) ,i m N w b (D C U W d C o -ri U a N U •ri a) )i W O u m U ri a a m u W O N .)J Ul 4 N ro 1-4 ri ~ m Id N u a{ C Cn 0 )i Ei N 4 U d 0 O r-i U) •,i O m ri ro " ~ )i o W C y di H m b) C •,i U U) N 4 H N O 0 to -k N N ro C ° N H H N HHy N m ro H ro N rd J N N b U 4 a1 G •ri ro U A U -ri $ L yy Xq cd ,C H U) O L a$ U ri A i 3 C O O U L w i }-1 U) •b m ro H X r-{ -i N U to cii .,1 A N O u N U i N H b ro N ro N •,1 H 0 ' a) U H u H a N O 0 41 0 U N C _x p Pr N N N ~ N 1-I (v !i U) •,i 0 W in ro N zi 10 m r1 O 7 U H m 1 r.. 0 )-1 ri •H N W H "1 N N N U r. Q ro to U N N U u N •n O li a N j.. y N O U N )i U) -rl C O N ,C U •,I N .ri L 'O N O) N i y •ri N a 'o f-r m o N N -,i o a a) li m O W 7r .7 H FC m Q F4 in a a m W O O ri m .t1 ro .U C N N N a }i O U) ro N U O W ro O 'U C •,1 X m N .C N ro O N O rJ C L4 u Ul N ro C •ts m u N •n O u a) ,Ci H O N y FC N )i U m u u m a N 7 J FC 0 N .,i b ) L -,i N y FC )i N 10 ) u k O 11 N > -ri 5 O >a a m 11 O U C N m m }1 L G' d U •ri r--t a N a) ,L'. h )a m 4 u •fi 3 ) [ Z: N to C 4 u O u a Z ~ ,~i N a O L N U m 1i ?1 O N N N N x E-1 ~4 Ur N L C Li Id 0 m N a A .NC W S, m N 0 Wa) ro )i m O N U) .C U Id )EEa d 0 to ro 11 N H m L) EN H U U ro o o u a ro U) U ,i a) 4) m N ~ N N N 0 C ro .C .q O C 4 m O d N O N r- -i 0 a Sa m A .C O to 1.1 u C O li p Z m ,i a 4 a m a m a m ti N m w v, rn r m rn o .-1 rn ti• ~n ro L N ~ m L a )-I O a a) 44 -0 a) 41 0 14 -4 44 Id a 3 b O ° y'O'j y rtS ri N 41 (d C L °NI N L 23 - ro N a 13 a d J., a 'J U -i P. rt3 44 (1) li ri •ri C a b1 N L U N v 41 m •Oi a U rn A ~4 a G G a tn 1--i q a ? N S A N K b )-I S 1 O >y L id i t W b N 4 a u ro u a a 10 0) 0 0 o 9 ° Isl -x a p a of U 1-1 u •'i s4 a u a N a o ra JJ a !J „ v v am) a o N ni 3 y a a°J u o m o .u a a O N k N U N O r~i d 44 1 Id rd a) O a ~4 to N a V H a U) •r1 z 0 (d a Q, m aG' L '1 1i a a o .a H a) " o AiJ - 4 r4 H Id L L U H O N a !J ,A N Id U X to 41 N a N r-i -r1 O O a a a U Id J4 N N H a ro a q v r~ w a IJ ,d .u r-i u m C " ,i (d rtt d O rcl to ri O N Id 0 N 44 •.-1 a) a N m 3 N (y L N O 0 U .~4 1J C U N G'i ll N 4-J .V a w Id U rr{{ a ra a a a N Id N w 14 id R7 N to •ri a a 0 L Id E , O Id :j '0 G M 44 roN a io N N id L N a I o u G 4J L U Ni v E Li A a a v I(d b to i 4 a N a p O , ffss~~ CL O .C a m a .u ti a N G v O y td is a b 1J C4 Q) Gi li k a L M 1J ~ 3-i O a N U rt a 5 a G O C a a w L U m qq `d a U IN ,UO f aJ A C O O O rt N a 6 -rN-I a -rI 3 Lam'. U U U a) a N w a 1 a a F~ a~ r4 a ?4 a) -4 a v 0 9 u u a > a U O -I m o m b o w o ° l4 E-1 11 }-1 o q N . o q A W E bt 3 N U bI a `H A aAi o o b A W d a a 0 N 04 >1 o N ~ a 4 N a O G k -4 -H k N E a a N N a w 13 t)) ~ .X a ;3 a •..1 N 4J J U N O a b r 4 4 0 .U U (L) p U m 0 -14 Id x a E N a u H H N H N o :j 14 ~ a m -H b 8 w ° a O O 4 -ri 1J w a ,J x Id o 0 a r-4 11) d 3 4j JJ M a -Lj -H rid o a ro a) o ° 3 u >i o o w u ar w yaj a N a 13 N wri a L a b -.d a U -H V ~ N a a )4 Ul a a a o a a a sa a •,i a a 1AJ Z E Sa-i Li 7 G 0 iidd a~J W jii 3 w u w li Id a H N m a in ~ r m m o N m a in e r m o 'I ri N N H H ri H ri H N N N N N N Q) )4 m a 0 23 o ,--I M N N O G U) mS O R U N zu H 1J a H z 0 li 0 O ~ 41 41 H a M 44 A O A O a a to a A i 1J - O a q L b R N a A ~ a N 3 m - i bI . 4' Q a i4 b ~ m •JHJ u O rt ~ N to ~ E ° o A JJ Fi Id pt q O a ro a ° a g a ~ 3 H ro r i r, Id N o U a o °a x H m sa a r o i a y d G E u .,A p a o a1 s , rt > v a r a - w 7 ~ ,1 0 N M a U , q 11 A A a u a a 4 A V N w (d CU rd o O . ro o p Id t4 o . ° i o o u o r-i r o ,J ri a .9 :j 0 4J a P. A 41 U td Ri U td id a N •'i r-i -H q u O f'+ ri iJ - a 31 N 1J - w U U yJ U b w ( a N a N 31 4J N .U 7 O n3 U H H w 4 a q U b N 411 ri N N --i \ v I (n .i ttl a bl w bt 44 . -i -1 U U ' U H N o O O .U ~ > . p . r O 3 m H d 0 ~ 'j N a N •C aJ o N 3 •,i o N 1J W X a 2 y A -ri o .C a o C O q N 1J M Id > N - a a N ro 0 O a U a w " i N j a a ed + a , a rt a ¢f [ 3 0 o Lo H U) x m a lJ a 3 N a a x 11 ° O 44 N r-i Q, .,i a m U) - ll JJ AJ N a UI v P r-4 O bi *--I rd a vi r `O a r0 a AJ 5H! N N G Q) A N u U 0 m O a .4J . N q -H Q) 41 a H • i a } d N W : N O w a 3 a L L N x A U U N w TS b N JJ N a O 44 U of a O b J iJ 3 N U O a u rd i n3 N G u ° A 10 (d J-1 U z 'd (d L I- a H O a ° to , a O R v dqi F -i A •ri U a o N a •r 1 N 1 4 a tl I4 iJ CC~x~ U: E y u v > T3 0 m d a a N O O C N F { N O 1) O a El) ' a r a) O N ° N a a -n N >I a U O o O m rd N 44 Ot lU 14 a -i a li yJ (d 0 10 w H r o Sal ° 5 17 r N p d d 0 b o 'q d q ' y, ~ c 6 z _ + t a -H S a i v N v b F M o ~ w a a H a N -rt N U U) a a E. 3 Id m Il A J-1 a) O ? ~ a •rl a a a a a a O H q a . H U qq in N O C ro A 14 w Q u i N A a N rt 7-, A ul o U N P, N m E N li ° E 'm N O 0 U a El ro rd Q) ` 1J C U ° rn A `N O m b 7 y ° N U . G 0 o a b L w O ro • -rl N Id a b -H U M L ?-i N a 4' N L N Q) 'O L O b O ~4 U C N bl m -rI L a 0 Sa N p H G a m • u o ° ro 0 M a o N W L 1J N U N to a L 'L) L .1 Q' ~4 O V Q, 11 N N ni r1 ~ UI b f~ W U O CI r•t n A A °u to °D ~ v ~ v ~ m 3 m ro N L G iJ i C 3 0) 1-4 p 0 ~ ~ a) + O b qq _ a q •,,A N .1 1 rf ~C 'U 4 N C -Gi N N N (tl G O N 3 A ~ b C O tJ O G u L •,i ,i N C v H •C ,1 O v al O ,i 1J d) u G a) G u , )i u .C iJ si a a) A a) u N C u 3 y N ~ t { d a1 G (V y m 3 O o L) LS N 1J X O d of yx Si u v C of .C G a ,f -~f ro 3 0 ' , u o [ o C O v a) )i C H u o N o ro b ro v o .-1 N u O • . N b 'O 100 •,1 A 7 H N w O) 6 O N r G ro N a) u a a aJ }4 N u a) G ,i i N N a w N N O U U a) a u N N a) G G O U O ° U G G m (d G id u -,1 W Si a) ,C a 'O ri u : 1i N -,1 N O •,i G' O u o Si N N w c u u rt3 L 3 N v a) ro ` i 1.1 3 W u O N N -4 a) O a ?i W G 1d G A ~J rl rA O C i d .u a) O u 7 A 0 o ra A O U -,1 N ro m a) a) u M u u -H u U •,i O -,1 u of 7 U) li 0 qq .G G N W N 1-1 (n Fq -,1 a1 O C of H u ro )i b b N A ' v ' •11 O u •,i a) N a N O W 1J 'd ~ al ~ N ro G ,i u N O G' .C E-+ ° G )i a) •,1 N y{ U a, C a) G •.d a ro -,i - w N N N 01 . . C 1d 'o "i cd a) a) a) O -14 C A ~ H y RS C N O 1-1 O y iJ A ro •n H C O O G fC O G u -H Li .,4 G 41 N ro N N u ro y 11 0 ) L S" U u U A rd O O N -4 a) A 0) 1d a) id Si b) as G a FC a) L a) (d (d aJ .11 U N U W U Rd N C )a -4 a) G O a5 O 10 O .C U a) G 1 •ri N Si •N 1d a s •,1 u ai N L L •.1 N ?i A 14 z U 1 , O ~ C O ri a G d 0 -i N u of b) N a O a a U G bt a) G S, -'i ~ G O a) A u ,i a ,-1 O w a) H d m -,i a .,a i G •C G A .C O O G u L U - u m a (d x 1 J N A N (d u of •,i u -,-1 u N A k •rl •,1 rd - u w a) of G 21 u y N 1J N G L N W u m a) RS 4) N L O a) •,i U •,i S•1 A O U N Si ~ td N (d y r u ~ A G -,i G A N O uuq o , •61 G A U a) i •11 u L a W ° a N N i i N Ch 6 i O (d O u N •,i ,-i N u L •,i u ro U) O O b 2i -C O z U a U O A - J a N 1 al w (d d) a) l ri U N N b) 0 ro u a) ~i a) a) a) 1 N •d N n5 1 (d •,i a N . i O P Si i a) U O 0 o qq a) N y - u t RS d) a O A A .C ,C G H Sa •,1 id o u g C o E, L iJ O •,1 m d o y C G .C N iJ l1 w O a) w ~ ,i .,i W A u a •H O u a) a) N u 16 a U ,i ' ,-4 •f~ O q -,t W H 2t u 5 O of W Si O a) U •,i iJ •,I A H a) A O ,1 Si O C w H a S -H d O H ! 'd g a u d N L .G a , a G I# O -,i N N U •,i N G p u U C i b G U u G O -,a N Q a r:; o r4 C o If to G S-1 C to G ks q ,-i a O •,i "[S a) O •,a yr H C (v iJ C , ar " N t, o a) C u (d A 1d 1+ u O 3- u N , ) 1 d u u i ,O ,i 'C3 a cd u U G 'CS ro G o U y O a) >a -,1 L G • 1 U 10 m x zS i - u - 1 N G 1 . 1"'i l a) •.i O }i a) O ?i a) •,1 , L ,-1 C u , N , u -r - a) )4 a i H Si CO U .a 'J m a u ro G a O ,.q u .i N as .q al .C Ei G 'O O a .C u O N a) fi aJ N A A at 21 ro N F w N u •,i •,I N U a{ co rd U W N a) ,-1 N t+) sN UI tp f~ fD m o N .-i .i N •-4 „f .i M N N H tp .-i f~ ,i m H N ,i O N N N N N ,+f N sY N tll N L N rO W r- 0) O u 44 44 44 0 ) N y O W q G 1d O q b' rt O O 3 O -I y, A u '0 N v 1i O u 10 -a 2; ,-i 7 N 3-+ -,i N N N •,i ro N u r1 F w a) U H u U rtf N (D v1 C O •,I ~ yry u N a d u td L u N U 0 U a) u ro N (d aJ N a) N 'd 3 al y CO', to 3 y, u •,i tl~y~ W G -•i a) 7 ''O C ro i )i .N .G u U 7 b v Sa O iJ (1) i u O G 0 ro 'v O U G' 3 o p aJ A u m O v H a) .C L a) O H N u C a) p -,I SOi ,i X s N a v L U 'O a) S4 O u N O o a N ,C u S o w N ~i N A rl H a u N ,-i •`1.a 3 JJ QI g N 4 ,~i 7 N U -f N y Fi ro -,i - N (a 10 D O ?i a a m C N .Ni O U a) a) 7 u ri W W- O 1S N 5 C °u O u a) O 0 N '1 k 1d ro G v ri a N U •l5V u N O) G i `d G •11 W iJ m a) y v •,i ,i N A w w a) N VV" 0 -.i N rd y N 4 C O tU O F S 4 u A 10 N v •,-i y v Si N fd 3 u N O ?i a N ,r~' F A u u N i O A H 0 •,t u N C O u N El .G u O C~ a O U d L 3i O a a) M a H R7 v N .11 si N N a) a) A a) y N A u X d a St O ? r -H 7 ,-OI r •.i N fa )i 1d W a aJ C t d u H G N G OU (a 'j E G O ti "1 y W IC 3 O F a) 4- F d G o •,i w •,i G b) N o roq N U ° a) 'n O la a N ,1~ u O y, O C N (D ~ N aS o a) -,1 w •,i r. 10 •,i G al a) A v y ro A N u a fo •,i ri al L N N -H 0 I) ld N (a ,i U N 0 9 •.L a1 w 2 2i a) L of U) •L .i ' Id U u N O d d) .C 7, A ro Q) 3 N .,i y a) N o rA 1d a ?i a) 3 N r, o •li td .,ui R, ro v 1.". F u •,i v C a1 r-i W r/ (d C 0 a a) u u •,1 o u G 0 d y m N a) Si 04 1d 0 H N a) u u U -1 o NI y RS u r v Pa O a) N Q rl rtf 7 iJ 1 O a ?O 14 O ? C O a) u C 0) ll N v N a) 1~ L •,i v A u .n v b a1 ~ N u N ~ O O a) .G u ro a) d -,I Y) ci O w W b U U) C uN w u ,O C d - N 1❑❑1 d rui G C O U N a) a u -H O q 3 O F p (V 41 i N .,I u G O O •iHJ rd ~ O U v id bi C." ~ N S4 O 41 N u a N lAJ N u u )i Oa u o fyy .7V a) ,J A 1~ ro -C iJ ~4 00 N N .11 m N 0 N H ai It U N Z U H (d iJ a a o 'Z. C7 ,i N ~ u u N N C O N N u O 1J u U N :1 O N E O , C U a) U O iJ r a) Q N U -.i Si C. rd 3 a) 'd •,.1 -,I N •,a O •1 L". N o o C'.. a) w -,f a) L -,i ll G al a, v N 1d -ri 4'' O ?i )-i a v -1 1i O G O u u v ro U -rl U •ri O y a) yJ H u) y, G O ro N N U N -'i y H o N O a) a A , .i ro O u rt G C m O Si O C G G v •rl ,C a O a) q 1~ u a O. rt) -,i N b U 1J -r1 v is x u y b a A . i . -i . 1 N +-1 .-1 N N H .i (•I (I N ,•t N ,-i rn ro G m 3 H u" G •.i 1d H a~4 a) ) 0) N S4 d W ~ 0 w In I) :j w y H N i !rd H ~d 44 4 N O d N U )J -ri 'd yy •r~i O U N 44 0 7 v JJ N >4 O N 0 ~4 (d U) of ~ ° O CR W Id a -.Ni 41 0 9 d) 1J w a dl R G p 0 41 Q) a fd :J a) 0 11 1.) ,f-, 44 u 1) N a Si S" )4 JJ td N O N r. 0 ,.C! ~fLyS ~ N 1t3t Id rd w h 0 rd r 41 Id 0 fd ro w v PG O) 'd F' St N bt H 31 z G 4 x rd -li Croy 16 OH B ~ U qN 14 •.-i N !0 m H L q w 7 W J~J Q 41 N ~4 En H 0) 0) 0 P o U :J p 1) N 'O N C. O 00 br )4 g O U w 4JJ -.14 d) o O - d ro w •.-I RS W W c N H 'd Id C W +i H Q) ro r-i 74 4) 0 44 a) 0) to N ) 4 w ro w p 4 ~ ~ C'. v U N J 01 ,'J u .u o o rt .-I -N to V Ill m m m o ••l •-i r-I 0 'd >a v O j b U ~Y O 41 1J 14 m ~ a ro o N w N v -H 0 G o v w U O -ri •ri N Id b N b b • JJ L N O W )J i N FNC y..~ Id r 41 O N d x 'd rd m o v d 3 ~4 41 u :j N ,C 14 W 1 H U X N 0 3 a N -4 y H U 'd J 0 04 t3) w qq W U d) x Id En O N G N r>; f4 U L 1 -r-+ W OW ro 0 ?i p ° y b N tH o N Ri 4J 0 x 44' 'd r 3 ~ A W C .-i m a W ro H )J FC 0 2 { E 14 N 0 E, q q qi O o N •.i CC -14 Ij 03 E N U) ~ i N RI c~i1 A a y RH'+ H N ~ H a ro L n`H: u J a -Hy 2 E o m o) . o U 0) N b' W U y 3 to .01 J.J CL) ri m L )4 Q1 ri •ri O W G N bf o' .C W y to 'c4 q ro O .d Id a !t tt1 O .-I H ,k N N N $ O A 3 pa m 1 44 ^l ^l ~ ~ m m o rv r1 •w In ei ri •--1 ri ~•1 N N N N N N v W W A d{ 7 H G 0 Id 41 V) N N a 5r N v ro o N H - C O ll l >1 Id N S N H 0 >1 qq ~d E O w H r~~ x U N b1 -CS i~ b Q1 O d) R 41 a) ~u ~j 0 r of q b d) 3 v ,J b r4 0 O 3 .-i m . 3 J 4 v O to L Id E a w zO FC U) N O ul 0 ^ id . E O w a E U O i m )-1 o Ni U C O O aR.7 o G 0 N 1f v N 0 2 O O z U) H~P-! V U rt N U) N N ri im' 4.1 a 7 H q .i ro a A 4~ o 34 O o a w b O u N .H H 0 W ro 0 N N 0 u 0O N A }i > Ci 0 L w O 0) A C H •.i yJ 9 N H N v .4' A N N 3 v 7 H N v O 3 ~i N o } 4 v 4-1 a ~r• C' b , U• A H v a C -ri G b b E G r al i ~ iJ a N L It 3 4J b1 a v , J 0 !i v `~i C H ?i a w Yq2+ FC U) N U 'd • Q) '1 a U o '0 .GI d) :5 u u N N 7 v H H w v ,_.i ro . o j N U po 'td xi 410 0 W 3 o a Wzz z O Q p z m H U O JHJ U 1-1 U U 4- td iJ v R ..i 41 G 7 U v ~ 0>1 N N a u w w L . N 0 A H N 3 y -ri 44 -H N ro -rUi ` 0 u -ri w Id - 'oJ L 0 i) v p N }l a w ?q7~, ~C O m H ~ O 44 N A N V) 7 tU U) L C o ro O W A R N AJ p Q O w z n H U N rd r td E 0 C -.i v N to) Id ~ v J-) ° :j v d) N H Q E Q Q 4 c~i -3 A-> Q) bl 4-1 (f U Pa RS 0) i -H •-I P U W W rd AJ i+ O 'cl v y 3 N • C: 1~ U 3 A.) •rl N w y O N m 7 N 0 a -W 4 Ui ~ b N L w0 }i m d) C) c3 N 3 \ M N N o H H d) 0~ V N z C) z7 4J M H z 0 0 O of }i o b C) .-i M 3 M N N ~ H o U) V) Ef) H N U N 7 zv 1J P, o z U) 0 a <r a~ H m G O L v i p O p, >1 v > v H N al O A a) u 5 •H 0 tiS v m '0 0) C d) v W O N .H • •H 44 a) (d H w O rd G iJ a) ~N 0) u o .H a U •H G Id H N -A U O m W X NU A U U) 7 n o 41 .H b ~ H H w m D N 3 U )-i 0 W L Id w C C oo p rd r F N A y 41 a) rtS )-i u H a ~4 7 > Id .-4 :?t c C v •5 W 7 O U) H C' L O ~ H L O O 7v A L 3 41 0 U a) a .4 13 m 0 Xd (D Ua) H U w 41 .,4 .C U U L N A N 4JJ •,q O U tJ o L) (1) N ~ O U G) 111, LJ U ~4 (d ~l ro o ~ y ~ H u RC y 44 o o u rt v 41 ro b N L O L O H 3J H W H ,i."' 4 H ll $ v 1-1 tp 4-) a) ~4 Id rd li 4J 0 b) b) (0 r 0 . 0 41 O n H O v X~ O o tn ,'N o m Q O t" H ~ 1J M w P M ~ 6 H r aW zz i W Au W U) aW A. O zz W zz c n W zz to N o •.a O L v U > of U -H N L .-i C FG W FC W ' W C W a C ro O ti H H H E H F ' o ° U d H~ r a H L 2f a H d) ,h , -l x H ) -7 j ri H >1 X a zy 0 U) •H ) ,3 N A (d 'Cq$ ° rd H U) -H ,'L', U x q w 0 t -j n ry s Iri 0 t:) p ai b rt Li' ui w LO 04 0 fd Id a) 0 'A u 41 O of UJ 1-) .1ii 1 to N :j U) O, 1 .C 0 EO ~ L U) O w 0 to b1 H ,C, 41 • ( 4 H G U) m 1 G L R{ . i X H O U • ,4 N A 41 H , L 0 L m a) a3 5 0 j N H O 0 44 U ll J, N ll {y of t5) U H N M d~ 1t) ~ i~ m m O .-1 N M d~ U) ~ t~ m O N N M •N Ui .-1 .i H ~-1 N e-1 H H H N N N N N N N H ro t .H U H U W ro S O d ,04' a) -C. 1J W W N t)) 41 H O d U H 'O q H Si N W u d C u a) d a) N - •H C. •H a) O A .4 11 O J: ~ U •H 1.1 ~ a) O d) 0 r 7 .4' J q L L rd to O a1 ti a C O H A u .C AJ rt U rd O .C -H L) •H •H 3 r., •H 1J a) •H .C U O b1 O l," H J.) H L .H O O .4" N Q) L (a O H ro N O A 3 L H H ro H 41 O H r) a) mo ro H .1. C )d 3N o~ u~ S m U rt 0 0) > w m u u C o 41 C -Iq Sd ~ •.N1 `O - ~r 1r' ro O v O •H S4 (d w O A m .-i 0 rd aV (a iJ w v •H w O a{ C X 4 X H 41 of 1J w a N yy...~~ - N O O O O L .-i .u O •H H q u a) a) L U rtf O .H ,G .G N .-l S+' b H O v r N N •H .r~-. of .H .-i 1J a} 1J U) O ro •H to O 1J e•i •n H 1-) ,G g o .H X w C w •H O ro ?4 H o A u 44 2) b C a) N w ~d rtt p, a) O al to td Py N O r u N $ v .H of o . A u w vi aJ N o H cd G 41 a u L 3 a AJ In u (d G 3 O v v ro k C i4 x C G O H N a) v w H •H H a) v v O al O W v v v w b ri 5 u H v ~:j a a ro H G m s4 s O ro A ~a m 0 4) A >f u 0 00 O L O a1 to O 13 X to :3 ri 3 O )4 O O U t r-i w N r A C A O C a o z O X W o iJ U O H Q) .`7 o v u o > ~j ; h w o) U N A -n N N H O) N )d •H O 0 :1 a) r 3 ,C to L A O G 4j 4j ro J"'. - 'n •H N Ul H F 4n U) iJ V 1J W U) ~ ri W (d W 11 [c7 U) cd N 1~-1 td H N 1J Ri v ~ a) o M' x W' a) a) W 3 Rs LP C o U o u Q o 0 0 o N 5 u a N o '0 o 44 •H 3 0 w L w w (d (d o z) o N m S+ •H G' (J) -I L14 ) RS U) ,C A tom-. O H q a m v rtS a~ w u t,, o a) zz w rn zz w X w z u y, m uu 1H1 A 9 7 v O m m W W C W O W O u A U H H 0 H H H H U a G L a) a) t] N H O al b L 4] L 0 7 a) (1) •H y y H a) d A H 0 a a w a N (D H 3 N Q (1) U) 1J H 7v L N O) H N H V' H O X r-1 •H G) J-) Ul .4 td U 'J Q H U X H N N L S, 14 H O O rd O x L'~;r; O a O aS Q) O U) a) U rd W f] v h u `J U tJ 1J L , a) A .G iJ )d - 0 .U v (d H U 1J 5-, O) L t) N I .H ~J U a) ~j (1) H Z)) N H ri in t1 rd a1 b N O 'n M C • w a r >p O N y 0 00, •H a) O a) AJ O b U) b 3 N U G G a j y N W U H ro a ~ C x a) N N r p cif N O O O .H 0 O .H C ,C 7 ~ w -,i > a v H n U U ro ro a 3 H o ro rn v,n .o r m m o w o vto u co o b N -?4H M N N ~ .H o 95 H Ul H d) O U rJ zv z7H~ a ~ a a cn oz o~ 41 41 HH v !H co 14 C~ 14 N - ,n N N H ~ O H tf) En - H W E~ °U ~ v H ro a oz U) O v~ H ri r) C G N u li ~n r d v ri u a ol o b L A p m b q w f N A N UU O '4 ro O W ~ 0 y i }-1 l d 01 ,G w L N (d ,P+ IJ j 10 l! ! C . J~ -I iJ N' -a ' N C i L ~ r A w w rt! 3 w y O ..-i ° C: -.i Al (d 5 s G 3 , ~ o u N ro 3 41 ro A 41 O Si . w 1 ~ d ~ A O o o u ~ - m • A x G ° ro ro i.l is .u tl ro U o a , - i to u - w w ri o w i a b a a \ G C N ro v N > N N A a1 G O w 7 rn -.i G O + a A 5 P. A W 10 q b nS }.l N ~i U U N N . y ~ ~ ro b u u r. 0 A 0 a ~ V . m A 0 G b U O l , . . u G 1, F N o .G 7v - G G N o i u x b A ~ ~i li A N F Cl 3 N N . ro . ro . U G S4 a7 X b~ O H 0 C r w U A U A w i w w ro 0 RS ro o x w ~ o ro o .a L ¢i H u ~ U o 0 q rt U C y ~ 'U O! 'd N . i . )i t-i N O w ri t . w m a oi 3 rq . s4 ro U A O A H Rf w A U y x ~ N •r{ iJ -I A A I w " L iJ ~Oj O . ,G., ro w ro - L Ul -i ?4 N O .i C A N w ,-i w O yy H N ld O H W a) 0 ~ N A 0 ~ O 3 0 ~ p ~ to ~r R7 .-l *-i w W RS . 0 2S C7 )4 7 U .l t 1 U N 1 i A a a a to H L . G ~ U a u •0 w 14 ro N t o vC 1 o al v i u~ N v u i at C G N~N v ' o r u o 'C m N v - u 3 v i 3 ~ x t , ro > y ro o ro N ro G l~ G N A ro N N a to N C .--4 O ro y G ri O >a 0 G N O n i 'O O U R' tq w Id 0 of r1 U •H w O w ~-4 al U .i : ai ~ r a L ro o z A n N -H w J C g W A A N O W N RJ w C i! ,f G O L I O W U •.i L Q ' ~ -4 ro 11 tRO3 y~ C7 -4 N ro •11 N > , , W O O C 0 ro H A a to a Q w U E H ro q N N R7 $ L $4 0 q Id H O O 'O a 3 l rtS ro O L N ~ 13 A o A rC v 3 W a J- .C .C !4 . y , ~ 0 N a3 Ro td ro li N N b .u w N C y r [ w tr 7. ~ C bl r w - ~n Q w C o a1 •,1 w .i ai .i O H G .-l O C 'A G .-i ~ a o o H R3 ,-i X R7 i .11 A •.a ai Ro . .,i 0, ,-i H w y .-1 w N x of Fi N s of .,i O r -.i N i N 3 m U ro ro w .-l -H ii ro w U 3 I N a sl o U _ ,-i N A o H > x u ~ w x y A al ro A N 41 ~ ~ .-i N M d N b t~ m a~ O 'i N t +t d r(1 ,n t~ m ~ O N rn d ~ "i 'i ti N N N N N N N ut N N C w U A G N N N t+t C O u G Rf > o w~ - N N ~ 5 a u ~ R7 > w O l -.t N ~ 0 a N N X H ~ A N -r1 N A H w U w 0 . i t4 0 A 4 u 0 U r .4 A y w U w l L u A w tr w ~ „ .C aj N C -,q C m la ro ~ C _ r-i rt ro o ro y y v w m t a a o m v , " A w 3 w a ri w d , N A o li w W N J -l Id •rri 0 rd > ri li RS w u H ~ U ( N 3 m o w 3 , w . G " id D AJ rn N G y 1 o M v rd G A ° to u ri G cv ~ -i o N o i N v N q u; o i t w m ' w iId a -i w 0 i w w N U N .U O N a U > N w y r ro U N p, St 3 rd N Z. A w N w R: rtf G N N rt w I A w A , N w N A ° G u 3 A u A w u o cn o A l w 4J , i l A u E d ro - 1 -J ~ 0 b 7 a 41 N L H ai L } G r 0 N .C ,o N -.i 10 i w i-i c i 0 A o ~ p p, 3 E O N 0 v N o u > 0 .1 " H U n~ 74 •r i p N v A m N . H y{ '1 'G w A C9 u • ro `i - f u 0 i U Z .O H ~ " W N ~ w C rt3 o a i w i - M A N " l -c 01 C p. 0 N ri U 0 ° .C zs A 3 'u 'Q ro > 0 ~ ~ ro i a N L ~ 4 4~ N G o p .14 ~ ~ a O aJ > b JJ 3 q 3 o '0 u y Q .n R1 a ~ O A 0 m w cn t7r ro 0 w G r-i ro v 14 w 4 L w C E i u v rn to v v v N .U -.i w I U G cd a v ~ ~ 0 G N Rs u O Z G a N N bl La w ro ' N G v w v ~.i of ~ yl P, F -H L N A rt u q G L o R1 w v m li y w rl ° A a ro d ro 3 ro m N N N r o 7 ro ro o m L v o G U v A u F4 H -n w 0 G v ro N m o ° o a O w O N w O w U N ~ O . CT G o U ll m L ` r-/ L lJ iJ C7 7 A 7. O G it O G tT w p b y 7 ?a C w C ~ L 'H N ?4 'O fd U C VI .G la ..i U w ~ ° N v A w a w N 11 w ll w ~J S . 1-i u of w S -i N !4i . 'U t 7i -1 N 11 U v ll !4 a~ ~ a x ° o a N a G b N G ~ r a ~ (n A o v O .C W 'LS tT . { N RS . i N A U b u N W ° U L ro 7 a -G N .-i n n w u~ ,v r ~n m o ~ ri a b ?I a, m O w u u Q) w 4-4 u 0 U 0 L 'O w 'O N p R7 ro ri b -r1 y O - N G w U M O Id U r '4 -H U w 0 L •N y .H .H A N N N 3 0 a) y - w w r{ L Sf w ,C L ro t N 0 w rtS a) .4 u N u b ,C. U O w y, q O m d $ L •rf L U A J: O O H 44 N N ri .r. U w A L C 4) w N b .-i ~j A A w L W O 11 O -H 1a w N • 0 o W O w ,G U f-, u a) u N O w w al N .4 U U w 3 H > ?4 ; 0 O N )i fd U d li U w U .4 o, •rf w O N C o L . 14 4) w 0 o o w 0) 14 w C O •1+ •ra a ~ ~Ei o W N C O O H 1) w G O 14 .Li U •n r-i w 4 u U w L •.i •O In w O x (d N O L L O to 13 -r1 A w U u N d 0 F, U w 04 N y, O O u N ro 13 -ri w r D •G rd N X O O - H W HL N .4' 0) ~ N co a) O 'd O r-i ro a N 'H w .4-• L d) L Id F b) 4 O ri ,d N' O $ L L ~j 0 L •rl L 4 bl W (d (L) >f O U Si O )i Ol L G' RS )4 :j fd )-1 w L C-'. -.i c.' •H -r1 3 w ri A -.a L 44 O U C .i .4 O >1 x H 7 o >v )1 -4 ri rtf N - ) y rt1 .L: O N N - 1 o U O -.i L N w r4 •cd 16 :j O t •d C JJ N P o W H U ro 0 L X fd L N H C O -H L rd C U 'd O b ri O 3 ° H U) W . H N y . •3Hi N )-1 m ~ L w L -4 0 O o L 4 (d P v 0 0 N •H o A d) 3 C .4 3 3 L o m -4 td N m O w Es w N w w w !i H 10 a) 4JJ ro > C )-1 w C4 r~ O U U w e-4 N bl 0 S, H w 3 N A L q rtS H w m x qd .O H U H gg 0 41 H O w N o •O m d) 4 0 G -14 a )i li 0 U 0 x (a~ o O U o x W to r L w u m u u W )~-t (1) b G S, ro :J U N O w -.C+ 4) Si O U)i fd L •.-I 11 N d w -.i N 0 U 2 U H b W Cl) q O W 3 Li RI 'O w L C .•i w $ U , ro 3 u q rt) )i N U N w N L •ra 0 r. o •ri L W N ~ O N N ro tT C O 14 w ,4 L L •ri N r4 > > >f N A L $ D O U N L Id .C X C , A U H S,t O b O L N x (d Cy W H x H t7 A W w ' W H a H t N N -•i O u 'd x U •ri o 'O w m 0 O H U1 H E o u H a z x 0 h 2 O H W N E o U H .4 L J O A ro m (d A H L rd A L cl y b O U N 01 4 •H L 0) ) X -4 ri 'O H D - N '-i RS 9 O) t O E N O t/) M O 7. C tn 0 ri y o O) v 4 to L L >I r-i U -H 14 L a d) 4 1 14 b -H a7 (d w L ro •H R 13 -H 0 tai RS b 3w1 N 1AJ 4 0 N Id L r-I O •H G' [ ' C •,i r-1 •ri L ,4 .4 O 4 A •H U L ri u d) -.i ~ L Cy w N rt H ~md +J u N N M sM ttl l6 h [O t,T O N N fi N .i M `1 d N !fl H b N f ~ r1 H 01 N O N .i N N N ~`•i N V~ N I[1 N N bl O 1n u 44 44 o w m 3 0 o ro .,Ai 0 r; N v N 0) o 4 U) ro (D ro w ri 3 •ri U iJ a) & d) 5 N W w L 'L) a 4J li Id a) .4 am.. 10 41 w l".. w i ( 0 H 6) 0 v 4 D r a w d) N d)i 1-4 U y 1 L U > L -ri L N Ry H •rl A •ri Ul .4 L H O Q) W O b H •H (d Id " u 4 C ( JJ N C A N ro - C ro A 44 >I w O H O O - m A o A 0 0 3 \ 3 U a) a `L S ~ q •U N Li b H N (d O -H N •H 1j •r{ L 'O •ri .i Id w to L fn 111 (d ,y w 5: C a) U 'L) q U JJ G (d C N .4 ' rf C U N .-i XN 3 u (d o y w Id o r-A d r~ u d ra •'1 -4 b L (d " )a L )-I O )4 L H O N O 11 ri. O (d F, N N O RS -r{ k w N ro O LL O .4 N U O L N N 'O - N O O G ,4 A •ri ,4 A A C N N t) 4 o A ~D{ w N LC •-i U a1 4 > A A C 3 L .H a H 0 C U > 0 A •r i > ftl ro (d rn ro 4 3 l w > • i ri i > u i A > o y X A o A ro 1 q N o r A N Z o r 5 x ~ x (D a )w A u C - r '1 , > u d u > H w a A H w ( d v S X L f~ 41 V N d N A 3 b ri H 4 d ! -1 O (d N O / (-I O )i w N ) (d S1 O U N H ro - H .4 W s4 d U r-i o G ro P >t M E O F. 14 w H H H C: 114 L} 4 ro m N O N ro O 0 G N w z U u1 U Oi w 4 N ro 3 N w -.i W m y b w Ol O JJ O Q) U O 'O O .-i H ' ' i • a N 11 N L U N L H U w ro •H L w h H b r i G > N L tx O N Z c CG O . ~ U O H ti V r 44 w 4 4 C w C O N A U •r( 7 0 H N ( (a. H w H N - , O . F O w w , O' ,q w N N N A - w a C!) UI N w r-i L N O H O L 'O > L fd 1 -H > W C>1 w H U w U N w ri 3 G C o a o u w H ~ •.i C o .Ui p w N q Id z a) w w r. L U 11 w N H H 3 N E U) O b td -.i (d •ri X ri -H O O O) O ' U O w w !i U - 3 u w rt 3 C C C . L .4 t~ o H w O > L -r! O H •11 U -rf 0 i-I b A td N w •ri 3 U <JI N -fi L L w H w y G 23 7 O G 1 O O 4 L U5 'O x w' +3 u TS O A A w w (d i3 w Sa ,P p, 7 N a d, u U yi O U O G .U H C •El u 3 u w O A - r-I C w w rd W H - N O N w N O U 0 ,-i w r' O -ri fd > N T 'O w U u ll rd y 01 A N H x .G N N w rd b -rl L N N L -.i U r 11 N w ,C-, G N rd w •ri U r-1 Li rd L w w w L d) ro N N L , 0, ..i O H A d d u •x N A H O. I4 E •U O •ri d (d ~f H M O •I F-f Id A 7 cl m G .-a o .C L 1-4 4 W u w 7 In rn ri w G U w w (0 -fl N U U -ri SI U A O -r1 a ' - o )S .C .C w 7 to ro C w ro o E A w .G a w E: U w u u A A 'LS fd w A P. f~ N w o rd co r Id H C ~i N N W H ro N Owl N H b C ' U ) 1 0) N d 11 O N b) a J_I 2f -H • i W J1 23 • 4 -4 . r P rd " U) W L . S H O 1 L U Q) , ~ . I N 11 td , /•i O O O N 4 • f C: ~ 11 d •H H 11 a U O Si w U N A' - W H w 44 4-) i r m u I 3 b p o ro W U O W W C W d X >1 44 N U 3 u o u 0 q O U H rts W y ,C 4 W X H aa m W 5 W b m o d a) U) jj H W 5 ad 3 N u .C rt ) u o q a) q o .-t w W m O aa~~ 4i O Ol b O -H 3 C O C N C . N -.b N a) H a W 4 W O 1 o m 3 \ A O i 1 E A i ' U) .H O o • Z 3 , 41 w H L U 11 Q04 bl 4J b1 0 4j N' N W i a d 5 N 1 0 o Q W O C N H 4 ( ~J !4 w J N m H Ei ^ W W a H N a a 34 •H 5 C O U .H 41 O Q W C X 1 J O .CU W Q) N fd a S, U EE W Id a ~ N P A 0) 14 p' 0 rd O O ~ -H H fd a) a) O q - O IC f+ U N U t; W rd 11 N W " W N F C -4 w G ~ H rti L a •r1 W 41 N L L . . H O H G )4 { ~ W :J r: O )J W a L yr -4 J 1 Ul w 11 0 C 2J rd 11 0 r G 1 O 44 'd O w E u H a3 . ~ -4 r-4 3 Jj 7 ro PI L C O W }.1 w r ;I .C q C N m U H -1j yy 1i [ rti .C J1 C W O 1 a) •H 11 C H O ~ W J1 U -H C rd 44 O W W N W O 1 R U N Q) M . N a • 4-! N 3 W O O U 4 A ,4 O H W U W N .O J1 d y !4 i x ) > d) W 11 N 5 q 1 i id J QG) L i b U m gg a . 7i U H 4 l1 J^-, w i N O -4 1-1 O t1 W C w L Z7 f z ~ N O P+ k4 U N W W 4 9 M td 1 -.i ?i •H 21 r-i O O t ~ • 1 O z A .C N 1.1 N J . E N w (d a A U N ro U O 0 N H a i 41 H W U w o W w am v -H 44 o rd W o q W : 3 C C' w z o q H H v N ro o N ?i a c roq JJ g W a o o w o x o u1 m in f4 ( - lT G ro a o C o W N U N b) u b 1 i c d W O U L 431 !i M ~ H z .x O 11 -H O )4 •H - N t, w q •H W y A b W N FC in 44 O C W U W O, 1.) 1.1 •H C -H •J OO (n m 1) W 13 L U b) ' >r w H ~ W O r4 J.' N W W W W U L q r N -H U U) H G 3 C -H id o C id w C N 44 •4 a m g x a 11 W 4 V NN id .u 44 44 H W 3 N N 4) b 41 bt W a) W rd C rd . W S O n. 41 (D 0 E 2 ° n o q ° o ~ ro 41 w w v x 0 a o 1 J1 U w H .C L •H WE -H 11 1J w C A d 0 ) W w 0 W i J ) a 0 1 N u i a 3 & U Ul .i n e~ a N m N m m o H H H N n1 a in ~o ~ m m o .i N rn w in H N H H H H H H N N N N N N 1J W r ro O H t` m oNi rn > 41 H o b CL) r , , Ui - C Ui. WO =i N o p o o V) r~ " 41 0 11 U) W a o q r 0 ut N v ul O 1i w Si ~ id a) N W NN~"'' 1~ w C ::s u S4 0) -'i N N 11 C; O JJ a ) a O - Id 0 . W W N G4 N 'Q 4 W u - Q) O LJ 4 q w qq w N b N . N U H N O i U ii O W q F., W 0 3 'r, g H Si 4-1 O 41 W :j r-i U W O H rd O 11 m a W o 0 H W ~4 `1 ~ 3 41 fA U -H W .t1 11 U 41 W fh w C ~ W - N 4 W O N N L •ri 11 N 0 ro W W A m ' o A A U i ro + a Q o W a) ` 10 U o N ° w E x sro~ii ~ N W 4j . oH -41i .WC v ~ W 2 v u u ~ tl w u a b ro O W C of W W U N > W' _ O 0 N N u N E+ :3 0) 1d go rd 1 w w - W x 11 X O a w w H ` in - 0 Ol m R N x 7 r n ~ ,'i1 .u @ 10 U - w q 0 i1 > r 3 a u v O > o a a) H :1 • 23 a FC O q W w rd o ro W C .4 F-+ U H N to U 11 N CL w `O - U o U N ~ A u • i q p w o o w w O o U . v + w U a w 0 q w b 3 0 W 3 o v o N u o w w w H x w w ai J4 O b 0 2 U w x w 5 N W N w a) W O H -ri u ,t; ,C p, N 4 a W 1 N W C C 4 H d O b U ] u G Q W H M L 4 1 a 41 , (y O O N •H U y -4 O N 4 1 J w ryc4 C V) N O N N -rCt ro U) 1a wF UG U ° o -4 O 3 o . A a W a , . W N t1 . i y i 1 1 W o t J ~ U) H )wi w q v 41 w x , C O w N w [ F: w ,A H - H W 3 H • H o W s G u x W u ro o o a w w m W w v U b O A p m H o G N H L ~ x d 1 J 1 • d i 2 rr, U` ~H ~lq-, w .H-f U 1J N Z { j O I 1 W J )-i f-) N 'i ri Qi N w o b o u 5 O b w U N C A U U H U) r i .C N W -H a yr W i -r H A J.1 A C w N b rt G J 1 u ` N o [ 0 N u N N C as to C ~ , w r d [n U N rd N O N .i 3 w JJ Q a 4 G O U a N ~ U N ll .H z 4 U 11 O 4 A H b u 4 W U O W a a1 W ° N N U N J, x J1 o c o A a L d w in H o J 1 w w W w L .-i N _ C7 E H U 'L) A H W W RS C u iJ m n. L ro 3 N A •H )i u in N R7 >y i 44 0 •ri }4 R o >y C U W x O w cn W E rY, H - >1 N A U C a) .C a u id X O O H 0 a) O Ri N w .,a C 0 .14 a) > N N St G4 -Ui O U N ri a) 411 lam.. ro R 1) U 0 m 14 m 44 44 H RJ N -ri 0 a O U to L4 O O >i U) ro u a) R - N o i) td U 4 -01 N L N X O r~ m a O U m S4 O o a) > ro ,C a) 3 X C ri C V H 4 C b 41 d) U x u P: u; U b x o o -4 r! C O O C CC N U 44 O a) 3 I I ro .C U x C r! u m O m fa m 'd Id O w a 01 0 N ro a) s ro m )i Id N , u N 0 Id O O A o b) •rl a) m 0 .C 43 R 3 >r -A rt .Q •«4 iJ Id a F, o0 m ,-i •rl rd m •c) r ro )i ~j u u a) iJ •-I U N b 0 . aJ aJ ro O ri o JJ >1 -U ~ p~ 1d a) (ud 41 ?i O 44 a) li f •14 ,J N x a) m R U 1J H 3 m ~ •a U ro U m li >i N .C 43 U 'd .u m : N m X 0 rl RI id d .Ci U N O U ul ro 2f •ri RJ a) 3 tr C -,1 •rt b) a) A 0 u U td m m Id U m H •u C H a) )-i O L U O S4 tUn tJ r-i N 44 QJ a U td x, iJ N a) .-i >1 U N b1 a 1 1 •.i O R 44 m 0 id 10 'U C a) O 0 ?i m 3 93 1d 4J O U L q N •r) ~ N ro .O O N Id d rt1 0 O xi 4-1 {p0y, U m ,1 A U 0 w C O O u m R 'o r4 O 3 W O )i :j U :j F4 U N id U ro x 0 O 1-1 O O >y •~H b .C u 41 H 0 44 o H td $ a) ~4 ::s .)J U 0 )i m ) Fi N 3 N b) .i 10 H O A b1 0 -ri >i ,-1 U 8 O `CU iJ x N v C O U a~i 'H -4 14 >1 li n) m ri JA.) al a) •H •r-i •'t U u ro bl •H >1 H O O p O 44 Ri N to C 14 0 $ b C cd .-1 (dd N m .,1 ~ >1 H H (d E E 0 u d X 0 O r1 m 3 b) 0 'rC7l ri -.i A (d U ro 4 0 o -4 a) 3 C 0 S r--4 H Id C N O U N of N ri rtl (1) ~l 1) A - N 1-1 (d u m rd q of m !mod r4 y, A • i ~-q .i 4 •,-I !mod a O U 10 O ,C N O b) Cz C H 10 ri ~j A a) x U U 0 R a) C u 4-1 O w H tin b )i 7 U U 0) U H U l•i ro m N id x O O r4 ~ d m ?i ro u m ~ co )4 N 4 L ro ~ O .1 it O 4 (1) ,t~ U O q «i X ul ( iJ m O •n H (Cd U W w O w cn w E n; H N R U m A C O 3 U id A 3 a.1 ro L m H a) C m 0 C O w ro 44.1 N W ~ N -,4 E H U 0 o -m R~"S 4 1-1 A to 4) t O m N y a) H N A ~ W N x u d. W 2 a C •0 L w N 4 N 41 li ~ 4-! ~ O W X O W O c., m Wa 4 H u: H .-1 ro 0 p, yi Li b :J O L Ri L L-1 m Q) m ai U O li •,Ci m tm C •H b -H A U O X., 11 m x ?i ) U a .ti H 1J •r! N 0,- -4 U) o O .C .u a) -Xi .H a) L .um m C rtf C O A e, N M a to ~ r m O ~ O H rl N r♦ M .i tN TI lil 'i 4) .i t` r, OD H lT N O N ei N N N M N W N V1 N Q) a) rt 44 44 U 4J ~:j rd Ici a N C y U O m > > 41 t3 N 44 En U N H ra d) 44 0.i 0, to U U 10 •ri ~ a o o x ~ E r •rt X )-1 U U m CC A O k O ~S C. R3 -i ) U .C O a) a) a) m H •H B 1J 3 4 i m 5 Ir: u x -H ~t : H 1) U) 0 0) 0) C) H ~4 C: C U O U u L W ~ }t - 5 w O Z U 41 U U W 0. U (d 0 ~ L . ~ i a z w ~ tD ° a id ° [n F, m o U a ro ry' U) U) M 44 U W U) [Y. H O w r U e i l ro N O ll 4 V) x n a S4 O 7 X 4) 0t 0 ) m N ?i tlb1 C o H 3 m 0 :1 a) ji b) ~4 44 0 41 of rmt in N R N 4 rd :1 td m O N U S4 u m 444 N 3 0 4 a) o m 0 (d 'd b O N w v 0 >1 ED rd -H (d 41 0 En v ~ N 3 p .u id u RS N r1) a ro ~ u > o N 3 ° 4) 4j Sw}i o m y i o a 13 N U qNq RJ i~ N m id m fd U) W N W rtf H 3 N F U H ,Lti 3 U - En H Ln n• 3 U R~ w U 3 U O w -1 -1 SH •fn g a) a) T5 H U H O q) 0 ~ ll xx ~ W N W w U W U U w N A U •Oi a) z L w z P4 z ro 44 z w U L O O O aa O O O q p U L H H r~ ~i H m H 3 W H W W W m m H to m m H :3 7 a) H HH~"" ro a. H 9 HH-' 7 p "'W n ( .r E O ro o g W o o w a U U -3 U U w U w U U C x H u o o a 7 O U N R L id N N R7 O N U O O U O G >a o 0 U ~ 4{ U m ~ m 0 25 N -V M N N H ri O C H rt U) H 4) a u N z L)) L a am m Oz ~4 t7 a ,H m o a w H }I co m O r-t N M N N \ 1 H .-i o 10 H to H m 0 U N H U 0. J w H z C9 .H rt m o ~ 4 41 H 0 N 01 fl N N r~ C UI to (n m O ro a) ro a ,UC C 0 rtf H X li o Q) a a U O U C. 4 a 3 v o U 0 41 >1 to U 41 O a N rti xC a) a) O r- -,4 li 6) Ea L) N v E U 44 4 N ~ 0) (a a ° G a) 41 r+ O R, (d to N x rn •.Oi ro td L m rl O L •H O to m 44 L9 ~ H O d L ri W a.l u G tn ro o o m o a o t > ~a o x •11 a) G. H 4' 1-4 H RS O O C. •d 9 V400 N O x U O to G Cw7 -Ni w N Cw7 o G C a) a) ro N N R'. a) .G W' O U O O at a) H OW, O 0 O N 44 U ,C G a a~ N tll ro O 4) 'd f4 U O id (d J. C4 44 x a) V4 W 14 (d ~d •H v G a W V > W to rd a N 11 ii a., z " a O z W O FC an -i U o o (d p H o H o a ro b o ro a H xi a rHi H 4 a •u ar En m ro ar ro W + o ar H ° -`ai a°i o m w z H 3 oc q 0 a d) N u v u U ~ ro a a w u H O C (d C 10 U) 4) W r4 N t'n U L (v u O (L) 4 10 L H O 3 rGd W -r( N H N 4) EQ a d 3 E N G U ~ 0 p x o x X b o a O Q, V (d u JJ Q7 m ,Q ro (n L) L•7 .-1 N rl •M ~ ,v m o, O N M a N m 44 m O m H a i i a G a u a) G O) •3 o 0) a " H a m x rt 41 •.-i U U H O rt ri -,1 ° ° a G -i ro ° a U O U m j N a N a) u : rd 0 a U) m 1-4 H O U C $4 (1) IJ ) a) n a o qq G a O U 4 U m V) H N 4 -,i EQ ~d ° 'Q 0 N i y~ m U 4 1 ~O i •r ul A U) ro C " a~ 4J m H cl 4 a 0 • Li 13 In a ai .-i L E a) to H a ~j U) 74 ^y a a to I-q o to H h d 3 to H rt y o 41 3 4J ul it r ~4 ,A 7 i o aJ •n N O L to N N Id 04 H H > r o ro H u o ° H H H H d a Rl m O R y N U H m Gh t71 qq •,.i w A ro x n o L ro 41 E+ r m a O H N- rl sH N .i .i N N N N N N b) b ro a N ,i -A -fi - O 41 k 41 H a U) H 41 ,`q ro ro C L N O a 3 ar X n ,d :j 0 L) 0 0) g > at ua Oiu H (d ~4 O U ,vtti' b U N 41 m ai O a) O .tJ a} x H a rd 9) U O a m -.Ui a A to b A a q W W O Id N N of pp,, O •ri 4-1 N u O i z 7 3 to a1 ro .t} m G S4 al H sl 0) o i 3 y m to H to p A v qq 3 (d 41 V1 of .4' fir. 3 td H H •.L m 41 -H ~ H rd n. 4 C'. -4 a) ro :j 3 a 3 ° o 0 O ul O m N - 1 O H N N ::j .t.r" t`• W (d }-i 1-1 N .Q N ro A~1 a 0) G H W (1) q •q x o y 0) o G0 3 (L) SOi a 4 q N H -'ii ro U) cn m 3 0 3 a .U a cEd O W m ~ a H H ai O O aI ~ a) (d a) O O H tr O -.i ar 3 X H .q •U ar O p) w W o -.a H m (7 U m C7 ,q a) A N (n al w ul a N G a G tT V; N ,i a) r4 U 44 d ,G to q 3 t1 H a) WW O O O ar O 0 4 H L " ,0 m H w o ~O W p H q m CQ 41 44 v bl iJ U m Tn 7, li W P'. L a N x R: 1" Ri tSi ('r u -mot U 7 U O b G H a) 'd m N W b m CJ U woo a c a) a~ ro ro A ° w c o H O ~ 7 N O H 4a 0 OI "j O -rHi N 0}4 •rl RJ •.i N U -rl U7 4i U i m co -OM H U a CQ v V) x G A G 7 a, m H U [ H a) n k 1 to U Q ri ri H -rggi M W O> ~q H b ~q H a tJl fq' b ~Gi W b y f7', G H C G W •N W y4i po~ii w 3 v at v x a m - u o u o 0 o t4 v G x u 3 3 x n u ~ 3 A o 3 E u 44 r4 i o C 7 3 4i 1-i q N U N N 44 Id A O 0) 44 N 0) O a) 'J 0 to b L U > O a .G ro r ?i L Q) 0) Q) u O 0) Q) la a) p a W a) .G N 7 rn 3 O U 7 ?i a1 0 a) u m O Sa ,L N O w A U A N N 0 a 3 W p' rd !a a~ 3 3 y tT 3 a rv ri r~ rv n a) H co d) o b off tNl N N O H US UI - H N U ~ H U 16 11 G W tq oz Ln r-i ri m °a~ J H N H to ai o ~ o .H N Cq N N .--i r-1 H Icf CJ2 H Ol 0 U N y 2 4 H L a U) z m o a ~g N N N N o d q~q j, H m m 44 m G w rd .u rd o a) o o Id 5 d x m 3 •,q o J -1 iJ N H H a) U G G O d O if u H El) Ui a) H •r{ •ri A z rtgS rd (d _S4 m cl Oa M U a H b m A m 0 „ N id U N u a m -,A G m r• A G G -14 H 0 3 w m 3 Id i, ro N H G N Id t, a, b q m G )J aJ ri H 3 o H ,6 N o E id N o R .H (y N H d a 4 -ri O JJ (D d a a) m f, ..-1 H a N U m J 11 N d H a) O a, O rd O O U) Id U N A (1) id N r• •H •ri In .G m i, H Id N N N 10 A a) IJ H b m 73 11 a H H H a o -rt H d w ro o b rn ) o 1, w „ m 1.) a o t, id U r G a > m v G !J •a ,p •ri G o •H Id I In 0 03 4) (d i 7 u O w G d ( N u 4) b L x ll 4 Ri w [a~n m H N 44 O -4 U N ,G O H f0 a) D O H ••-I 56 1, w 0 u H 0 ro w )4 (1) L) 41 w G d id G 'd A u W u 3 H m IJ 'd u O H 0 H 0 r. X to .,i R O ri x of ri •H N G O d 10 10 . t m O •ri to m V L m a) G .u O H m 1J N H C N UI H •ri H •ra N L ;:I •ri o 0 A C H U H a) x o A u G m 0 o G b y y a) U 3 .G a, .G u ri o a a) .G A N N U S4 o N (x o X 4 N U 3 - OU m 'roO y N ri N m O N W N N O •ri ,C L u W rd ri ai JJ 0 10 r4 d m w m rx i 3 a 1, to x~^ a) N a) d O m m W ri -H G •G U 4 H a) •A H Lj a w 4 w u )-i >i W -ri z ro Sd :3 N ,J y' ,J ~ a) ~ ,J 3 -m O, N w 0 P. a x Q 0 H N N A y G P. L m m b H a) E. w .G r-1 roC G E. 0 to H •,i 0 ICd Id w o 0 (L) o m a) a a) 0 ~ d 4 a u H JJ [ C +J S 3 b -Li m b H H z i m F H a, O .G z N N O G i a) O N G H U tT O H S. G U 'O 41 O H fW] -Ri j 01 N Ou '0 H m .-Hi a H 4 N 4J m 'C ,J 0 to ,C 0 (d id F N G -H N i, 6 L of H O w J a) u E •ri O U H H ••a C •ri Id X a to .u to 4~.I7 a, a) ;j a) id •rt H > u a) a$ ai L O H O 0 rd 41 > 3 C a H id m H •rt m w M w > U a) H O a) a m m a O ri N 9 0) 1J G 7 H m b rt3 H , 10 -ri m .,i ..i to H a) 1J a G m Jl U id d) 1d a) L E. r-i m a C •C 0) a 0 .G to 0 a) .G 4 .C O •H i, N a) 0 to 8 iJ H id 0 1, G A >i L L m O m •ri A ro 4 H N „1 W to b r ro w rl H H ri N N H .ri ~ ei N N N N N N m '4 i rtf w w U 4 En 4J (d H N N N i N N H ri a) m G O 10 •G a) H H $ V a) •ri a) . U 11 w a) O L i 1J L ri Id r0 id a O to U - N U .U O •r! 1J -H 0 r-i 0) G (1) V .G b vi 10 U G Id •a m r-i O JJ N ,G )d M H a) u t3) x H C •.t ry a) rd H 'O U) ri H O) a) Id A a) C G u o m i) w m r-+ ro a) y L 'j H .G 1J JJ -ri •ri id 1J m 3 •ri o a 10 a) .C to O F >T a) ri x a m rA u ~j G U C; H m C 4 O ,G r-I o H •ri H iJ 0 •rt b as O Id (1) rG •ri 1J 1, U m O m ,G N a) m G U p• •ri 13 N to U 1, w i o 0 m u r-I 1J w 11 .G ad o rd u m o u JJ •ri id G m (d -rl a •ri •H L ,G ri (d a) iJ •,i m G 0 0 m m 0 01 G 1, m G L H a) Id i, ,G 0 ,J 0 to G H m 't) G m H - .IJ S( a y .G Id H 1J a) 0) H 9 3 0' u U b g r~ w 4.) u 4 a) m m a) a, A 0 44 .G H Id -ri al •ri ,G ri 0 G to m O 1) iJ U 0 U a) >4 'O m ~ V U) O (d y L a) Q) a) U) G G a) 1-4 •H m m -ri C ,J U O Id H 0 3 (d m H H ri 1, •0 -ri H G O 0 u +J G w m 0 a) u AJ JJ d 0 b •N W N m r, m .U i, w U 0 O 0 0 i A U m a G O U •ri 0 G rt1 g u O m H , a m It i, r-j H o) H v 3 (D ~171 0 0 o Q) a 3 ,-d-~ u H m U x, w 5 -H 41 41 m tT 44 ~4 J 3 w 44 l-, aT 3 w w rd H u ro m a) b q H N N H -Ea 'd ri H Id G N -.1 o N .C -ra U a, Id 3 A •ri x al A H 'O ri to a) O G r+ ~C m d i, H +J m (o O r-i a" G 5 to •ri b ro a 0 m > y O A b •ri R -H •r, O ri 3 G H C p, U b H cn Zn d a rtS u G G •ri w a) •ri u O X G 3 ri C .-i to H a) m A 0 0 o d w x y v (D m 'd -4 N U 0, m u G •a A > ro C ri a) J o ro i, u q m -4 0 m .u at u 0 N tri -H a) H ro 10 iJ x m rti ri m m qq a) (a O M C ri x G a) u H O d > X N H 1J 3 id •ri 0, it a) li >v H b •ri (L) r-i ri id N ri F ,J rsS m b a) ,J 1J 3 A A w A •ri trr ra A H Itl N a) H id O 7, ri O b a) W o A b (1) H a CO a a) - O as tar Co Id G d ,G „ G .G 3 G H N G G 3 A „ O 3 b „ 7 u N C N Q) O 0 a) O •ri U) U } O 4+ O •G a w U m o G ri b a) m 0 m O H R) iJ N fd H -ri a) U „ C9 a) G ,J fd C al U 10 Id -H C: 0 N v U 0 a m ro U , m 5 H b 3 m m J m w 10 H x w G m u r-f 4 0) m o m ro 13 a) o d b C 0 3 G ro ro G > U H a) o G o a v ro 10 E u [ H -H m H m H r-1 O w U) H r-1 m .-i H U N a) (L) N TS X (1) u W a ll .i a ro ro m m C U) X m m G a 5 ,J b ta 7 N G a) m -H G 3 .o E •rt O C to ai O C H m O O W O m C id -d a) O R' O N -Iri o ri N ,-I to N a b IJ li A A „ m E i, R 6 A x u •-1 N rt <M to to t` W m 0 r1 W N W O~ O ri N C tJl H m v 0 2f o -4 N -ri \ 3 r~ N N z~ O H M N U N H U J a w CA Ez e-i m o~ H N T. OD m o 'O o N -4 M N N H ri 0 10 U) H N 0 U tq zv H sJ a Vim) O z u ri ri U) O ~ a~ H N M N low - 3 rn H o L r L •r~i O L X O ~ U •ri bi .G W Q) 14 w " ° ~ o ro v L -1 C 41 v v -4 ;:1 li Q) x X aoi w k N w ji ro ~ " u .C a o y o H H H ro H b L i L L ro a - 3 ci 3 C L H a L L L O r-4 L a r4 ~ N a 'C R N O ~ id ro •-i rd OI L r-I m W L A br O H L O L O U > `O 3 3 (D -4 L to -4 L0~, 'O a RS y N -4 L 'd O H p w G r o 'A b 0 L bl o (d L Id Id a dl .A O J-1 H N L C C >r C ro S 11 L tRdS m 'LS it 41 r1 m a) o 41 rtf 0 o OS L C m a Y+ ' L H C x O a •H a: H A L a r-i a u fd + 3 C 3 b E to a A -~H - w w rl O w b w y 3 U w v >1 q o o w N x x ro 41 d5 c N~: 4 W~4H~. z 1 U z 3 Z L a 4 a L V a o L a Id o 3 H Ai 3 O •C. cd H H •H C H O U) 0 " 3 L A U) ul U) XG w w 5 E 3 ~ Z b 9 2 E 3 2 u E L o •H o a H o O o L o H O N N L1 N C 1-1 W -H O W O W 3 O C U 07 w .X of 9 L U 0 U a 0 U O -.C., o O w i A -'NI N cai ro H X .C tr ~ O C ~ a H . 2y d -,1 4-1 a 3 w x ~4 R1 x a O a b O : p 000 U O b b li 41 U) m X ?C N X Q ~d A 0 41 4-1 .-4 N ~ d ul to m ~ O N N to V ~ b F m .C L •ri 3 a ~ w H li W O L O N C H w X 0 b o u 3 • i A ~ 3 x ~ U L L J-1 Id L O b L 4J rd O J ro L H v L H n• H k U O U A N H O H O •i _ ~ L U ~ U L N d ~ 'S'. W x 2 C J W 3 z N a' r. FC o o a o w a 1 m p al U7 a Ul L N U W U X W v a U L a x k N H ~ O y U ro ro N v o O N N L k N N b N ~ a li C1 L C ~ u (0 0 L O N a ) L a U) -d .C a a N N L p N C a S d X L a $ ~ U a A i S J J 3 H H w U Cx~ C) r ~ w w P4 o E F l El E- W El a H a z 0 a O O •H L 01 O N N m sT tl} N N N N N N N ~i a 3 ~ A m k u q C C L 3 q L L p d y H ~ ro O N OO L a a G d A N ° n a L x r Rs to V) u o k m x rtf • i 3 a 3 L k x Id V) 0 Q X N L 41 a N -H -4 V N N C , , 7 ° o o N H X G x U R O O •H r-I G' a H :3 N O b rd a~ U U a H a a !i ,S.. 3 Li H x! U -W 1) 0 L O O U •ri z U X U W H N W Id CC~~ • yry O O Y, ~4 W 0 t wW 3 W 04 W x x W m U rn W N O U W a U W m U z w 4 w z ~l > r.~ N •Z. N ~ Z a a ° P a o D4 0 a O w o ll U) El In CU Q Ul Q ~ 0. ~ H U; ,F+~' a H N E r . 4 N H N z H : 14 rf z W x ~ N ~ G E x u A W O w ~d W to W U U a U U a O U F. r-a U a L N :E" . N r-i N k H 9 Id Q) 3 N Li o 44 H fi ,CC -ri L U N bl U !1 ~ rd ,C C k rd O b 3 It O 3 U rd N a N a o~ C. -4 N N N \ r-i O C H rmd U) H a 0 U N zu H Id U a U) H Z tn N O ~E N N In m ai N rb a o b O ri N -y \ rt r4 N 0ror~ H u~ 0 v N zv H L w ~ o z C9 .H H m O ~ ~E N H 1i O H N U 1 - b w l4 w H C as w C > N O O 4 mt •H L w y •d >1 W Id Q ri rl Q) r~ .U •H 10 (1) H 34 1 -14 3 -H w H m O H -H d w O w 'd rd L G •d m Y+ N N ~d O •.i 0 td U N X G w d w .U u O U U U N H ro G b Al )d J 1-) u) G •n u U G m w > N y G 0 •H G x F' •4" L i .-i w 3 G 0 H N H N o U U 'OG rtt E. a o 'd w 0 o U H b 14 ro u S4 N x Id w O u d H at Q m •H w 3 O 11 b u m O w X ro C7 O U w X •H H .H m C O N m w w O u a >a -H .C U Id to m w -H N G m w O O u , H 'd G rtf H •H 'G• W 11 1a w i4 )4 ~ Ri b •,~-i -4 13 •H RS •H U N N w LL H Pa •H S-) N RS •H w r (1) x G •H H a) O G w w > O w •H 4Y 1•4 :j 1J ~1 4J •H > }d O n O U k I ~:j w G >r w ~j & b •H to 4 U m ll •H JJ H o Sd G w G w O O G H 34 O G O !d u) N E m H FC > G o C a U N N G w u x o C m w d °u m Q) FC U m w m a Id m u) . 1J a -H w li w G O W w ' d O W O w W O m m w in x U ° ,Lt o t d ,C v W x x U w Cw7) ~a u O :j ,T x, U CII D4 a -4 > id r r4 u L 4J 0 A W 0 a 4j -,q ~4 (d N 1J j a m 4' a a a ~j m A° ° v H 'Za Id w H~ r ,~Z. H •T1 X 7.i H W td U G •.i L x W .a .G U A a H O •G O Id w N a) r- ~4 V 14 (d P ~4 o W o U aj a m }y li L U w -4 ro (d o Q L 1 ) 1 4j ,q W M U y a 'd P a) 'd G w > b G N w 4j rd w ° 4j N N o ~ U o to ro 11 r° 't N r1 ep to 1D h C! rn O N H H N .-i MI N ~p r4 to N b N r H ro .i o~ .i O N H N N N M N W N 1I1 N U) b w G o w O L O n G n w u w .H N u G x x y 41 G H i w G U 1 ri H H G O I G d r-4 b ri 10 y G 41 i i ro 3 G A of y to q O >1 w Li G O •H 41 O fr' 13 m U 10 Id }I )d r. m N 1J o •H 3 w e3 0 o H Id 0 H 3 N u o 14 w -H 'd a 1J 'd Id W w m ,G 0 G w 3 .G b m mq N .H o Id G w d N rmd 10 H b a) o w w .u w > G n. w 3 3 .G A w H b G m •H d O .u C F4 G O 90 a) O u w L -H 3 1U ?i A n. m w .G b L .G w 41 H w d d G O d A N 3 U m w X m o ro A o o W O V. r-i „ 3 w Id 3 H G w 14 •n G w m m - 'A to (d L 41 M w .G w ri O 3 O m i.r N w o w 1.1 a) , 1J tT w O t31 Si m .q G U A A rd A .C .C ro 3 >t 4• ro w 0 N tT •n ro ♦ w .tJ N m U 3 G m rt % w o G O •H rd A •H o H X X d Si N o 1j u 1J x G si ,G in > b G H G m w > H -H w G b s w A u G w G L u G -H w ,q O o 1 1.) O Q .u m ,q L .C H ro Fi :j Q 11 4 U w 1-1 w eH :j O .c L m >1 O o •H L H ri ro H H w -H m A L a, •d w 3 G Id L •n H H O 3 3 U 3 H H W N W O U N -1 O 'O 11 O U u 'd q z as L a5 td 3 0 ~j W A n. O N o W o R .d u .~i a 11 .-i U U; `d w L w .U U a U m u w o a) w o -H > q -H w o w H 1j a a w Z •H X x u 9 a w Z w U) W > H 'o y w 3 x U FC w v) w Id m - H of 3 U N RC w m W cx1 a,' 0 Ln H w w 00 rl o U) u) H G C 11 w z o to E+ a H ro w U C H a) U m m r4'd ,lv a aq ~C H a H a1 u w 4 .u w >r •O G ~ C tT m ro N 3 (d m rd ?1 w Z a C H a H a Z. w O W 4 m C O x 0 H .u , ro i 7 L o O 0 0 m m 41 O 0 1~ u d ~:J ~4 ro o o o )4 C: r-1 O U 7i }.i W a O u x v ,G a c U W a x v ro w O r w c w m W a .G L x u m W a N m 10 U .u L w o ro w H w m 0 o (d 0 o w ro ro 0 o v u 3 G o u n > 3 w w L w L O •H ~ L j.~ w m G 3 N N H •H N 1~ U N al 4 m w x O ,C .q •H O R) Ut U C N U w ll J_1 O ~ O G GL ~ -H d .H •H m m X d b u O, U b, f~ O O ,C x .H rtf tl O GG C O w -H -H u 0 u U ll A 3 E U U) N -H CL A w 14 ob N •H N N N o H W H w v ~ U C(dp a d W fq o z. a <N H w m d) ov N NN N ~a H ~ O0 N H N N z u H J .U W rl) U) t7 H 0o a <x o~ iJ H W N r N 0 o j ° o ro :j x v > , M .,q :j o C H N •r♦ 1.1 N N w m o ~ u o 41 X, d a) o 'd U JJ W J O 1-l { 41 1J H >1 d ry rd ro -%4 1J w L u N id L Ul O ~ { W `d qq m 10 O N . 0 N td 0 N C > 4 n tn A N E n o 16 ro x 0 A . " o a x o ~ N d 5 N b J l iJ li 44 . H H aHt a.i -H w - J ~ - 0 r U 10 0 Ai v (d G o G O 4 U 4 , 3 G $ O N Id D of N N b w O H to N H 41 O N m r/ rt (d $ U O rn a L m }4 o rn m w H N .C N N 3 11 L rd a iJ ~ 'd ° z a1 u X -ri r• ?a m H a L mro m O w O v ro o U G N w o w o ,2 En -U) 3 •.H4• .H ~yy _4 ?I U H U •ri N 3 1, m 0 U) 41 Li 3 d to to H 5 O .0 U 14 O 41 Z ro -N O N U a i ro 0 U N u ~ N n CL N H U W N C p .i , C J N C d U it i i U H W H 1J 3 Ch r' ro ro O O H d rd ro 3: u 7 O H N U H H U w G > qq N ~ CT H d W H 7 C1 L w u o rn N . ~ 3 G 41 o W H N u o -.Ci G o u w i qq ro .i li a) u o N v x N ro i rtt 13 ro a dj q a N 1S y a1 v 7 w ~q 5 , G w ro W W 2 3 'C iJ z N n, m ro it G 3 O A o a ~C y q rt N H [ m 0 X o cn m iJ U N N H C . H E . 0 U H OH U ? I 41 0) G S o -r 1 H v . d 411 -r1 N U) O d 1 •r N d L. d .G N .H Id 'd S4 5 H U W H 3J y C U Chi ' H 9 L H H ro C9 L O u 3 a) b ! y ~j N X j U a ,~1 T' E a ~ m ri C R w O U 44 A n• a O Q ' i - 0 1.1 oa N 4 u U -H Q N v [a " ro 0 P: N o~ v ,p Id -rt .0 CC r: 0 N q 1 w ro H H y~ Id W rti 4 a) 0 W U N -I X U3 N L iJ 4 . 4J .d U U ~ L H v Id m q 3 ro o q tl w y G m N 54 ro u y j y m ro N O .4 v o V id 0 y ~ ~ G .i N e1 ~P Uf m r m O, o ~ H ~ N M ^i ~ H- h ~ to H r m m o .-1 rv r1 N ttt r1 .i .i N N N N N N J N H U U ? ~ •N O N X -4-4 ro N i N rtf H H 41 - i W N N 04 G ro N d g O CA N 04 H •G R N 0 r-1 -H 0 4j v lOJ N 4-) o v OI al N 3 o N p ' > . > w U a V to N y, iJ 1 1 U G H N 1 U rt p En P i v H 0 . A a)O 4J ~ y ll ~ d- G J N ro ro -ri ,G .U iJ i N 44 .U Ri 4 O Q) 1 1 O •ri i ro O r-1 G -ri W N N U .U U C: N H 4 41 H4 G b O H U . w O 4a Ul W to . m (D 11 .G iJ ro G P, , iJ U al RS o , U iJ m (1) Id R p G rt U td A w N H O 0 ~ N v w iJ -A ° H H A i i • O O H 41 ' FI 4 U Id 11 •H bt ro O ul H H N cu H U O U 4• U U G ~ l O ^ L ro x U 1+' 7r r-1 m 1 N N 44 11 a) . u (D r i J - N O U) H l - i L -H H d N N a 1. 'r( _ aJ N U N W O G r-1 ro U N r , u U Id A b) ld Q) N H u .u U 1 3 U (d m o (n iJ RS G C b G i v .G v q iJ 2 b G H ro u rn N v , N i 5 w - i N fa .i G u H Id u in, a1 O CC o tc1 H v ro X -4 a/ w U N H ' u ( iJ ~ E' En H O 4 ~ H O -1 a7 a> H O C ro N @ H O H m . X A ~ 0 r -li k A ~ „ H + H H ro .ri G f". Fi JJ .r. J .1 - d H w U O N N 41 tl 0 114 11 Q) E i 1 N u o S roCC o ul ; M N 7 N b O ~ G w N H o t A u 23 m N R b H w N o iJ ~ O a a ro b m iJ ar -n to G u H R al v w 'd o C7 sa 3 rt1 H al C 'O 7 H ro qq d 3 i ro w G N li r G o v to r-1 2 U v a m A . L 0 H U) r y H ro a A ri ~ tn O H G N ` is ,q A i H ro . yq rt .H C S w v ~0 v ro N G G rt w o o l.r p 1' v u v co w / ro R a w ro A~J 1 x N m U H i : ~ ~ L O ~ H -rt H U Y i H N , 4 J N ' U [ ~ E ~ A H ~ W~ G U W a U a L UN i a , H u -ri td OI U O 4a N m O U w 21 rd ro q N v a ro L td N a G l .ri 10 N ro r ~:J u H t" q 44 y 0 ° . ~2 4 G n , , , 3 rtS u ro C + v rd L m v { m E .,i v N G X H N G 1 1. ° u r U b " b i r i CO U N m H 4-1 ro R to J 0.' G W U U N U y m 3 u a .C O U N [ N o o . .G 3 L O to o u u H a 3 2 ~ m > D b g to ,J . -1 S, 1, N n li CC U a) 3 L A m N N a) N G tCd O 0 ro 3 y D [ L u m b D 3 rd v H H H - H a -11 H .H a n .-a O F 44 . a) . A A 3 E 'd .O F ru al a, w a! a c v , i ro u C i a ro ' H, ~ m c a c c v ro o H ro m ° H o c c 10 v r. H a n a W u 0 v ro > u N N m m ° ° m U C .H 0 •rl m 0 r N 4 H C o w w N vroi o O v U : C x y 0 x rd o o N o o ro C a) 4 O a )1 a 11 C d " m C: L o •rl U) ttl Cfi G .aJ w 0 O ~l ~T G `z1 -li A N 4 N U •ri F y m C _1 Id UI Id o ?1 w a) ~ U 1-1 O .u M G • 0 O }1 0) C o 1) N A 0) y IV ~4 5( L rd 1) N .C U m N m U i1 Ot a x -ri m rd J >a G O G O o co Ur O 11 X 0 N 0 W o N -H N 1n f4 o W w 1 rd C O 11 b T) a) IJ al W O O N 4 N aI m ll .a mw (d ri •.-I •ri rd .d N rl -.-I H .C u N X: .C 3 to Ul --l ri - + a) li w N 11 .u G 01 N R of N L Cj (6 .G u (d >4 3 N 01 ri o •-i aa id >i m 9 )-1 a) 0 U R .4 3 JJ u } a) Q m 3 b O d O U ro H 1-1 u )i N N 0) r4 •rl N a) U v m 4 Id N N N 1 H H H w W U ri -,J 4 O u U) Id ri N 4 C O to 4 ri w A H U •11 4 O •rl 11 ro cA -1 a) N C rtf 'F.' o C N y O q a) [h .-f .-i W m O) U •r4i F b G o I -f H 1 i. r . O U u 3-l H n. L O F li o O rd >r 3l C H -Y )i ~ A ~K' G O N C. 0 Ic: a) N N > N .4 a) A o 14 a) o H U) 5H' a1 p m 11 U) O U y{ a a ai .4 L O U ro Id 1-1 -li b R 44 O J-) d F H G w •ri N O W N O F f1 O F )4 O 3 O r-1 ri W Id 1.1 to •O 0 a) fi ,4 L -ri N UT N t71 O) 3 4 w U N 0) a 0 O a O w ,4 41 'h Id ai a O 4-) m N N O O a ~ O U 10 3 O A 4 O -H N m -ri ~r 14 U N ~ N U 4 a) •d r-1 )1 O x N td O) ~d a) q •,4 O O W Id U `Q m ~ W G w A a R G ~ '1" u (d y~ lu o b' ~ C a u 0 3 v 0 U o ii G a cron U O ,a O u) C o 3 0) .4 11 C h C rd U Id .4 3 > N 4 F 0) b y u C'.. -1 m tm r' H O r i rd A E. U -H w o O m ~ fd C -A U u O 'd C i z1 R 11 w TJ O ch a) -H y E a) ,4 i., 4 w O Ol C •ri a a o C m o ro 1.) H d ai 3 O .C l 3 i O ~ 0 •d i, cc N U a) a I O 3 L 4 u l4 3 m -li C 1 C o tT m ) a o ~ -ri rt! ~ m u m lJ .-i O z m [ q -H , 0 Id H N [ o w F r~ H o u w G o O) a) In to o z O U) `p rt a) X y -H :3 X H id C. 21 C N X 4 m G •ri yt m H >4 N O ro .4 A L H 3 N -ri •rl r-1 H O A .U u b A 4 m 0 a) N A ro r1 aS tr L" A -r) O A o H z i'• H b) r i rd ci U r• N H 43 > X U r I to w U O l m N N N Li X i O -H a3 b) m N m L N y~ m Id at aS )-1 L hI W O i 4 O 0 0 G C o n1 d b W O) a) ro a) . ) { O r-i 1.1 A U U .4 h 'n -ri U A U R >i a b) ~ H N Ml yl ul ~ n m m o H N r•1 V Ul lv r m o .-i N M Vl to N H H H H rl r1 H e-1 •-1 N N N N N N a) s r~i v m 21 ro a) ri A 11 O W rc) Id O H :J w a) a a) A 'd N 4 U 'd C :J O M 4 1) W of 4J 0 W A i) X 0 -n O a) 4 O C O m O C m L m •ri 1a 3 L y, `d O N o k U ~ A U a O I G N b) m U U U 1 ..1 .4 A a) o X q d 4 V N > C O S v y ) y 0 7 .r1 se O O rH k a) o o 0) x L @ -ri H q rtS a) r: H p a) [ :1 O rt1 d .C U 0 4 m U •ri N a) v0) m 4 U C o N d bi 0 •H q ~i G d U y 4! ,4 U ~o ri rU > N -li H 0 R U G w U m H O A U Id .4 w 0 to H A m .C i) to 4 -H O Ol r: H 10 0 a O U m 0) •11 -1 H r♦ 3 C N E N r-i R O Sa a lu 'cl 0 A O H a a~ 41 .,A fo .-i w C ai a) b C O 3 o O 0 N E. G CC) 0 o~ o .-1 N 3 M t 14 \'I .X o W x U H U H X L i X O w o -X .4 F C O P. m N >t ~1 S1 td m -li )i a) X ro o -ii ai -H N r-C ~-I (d a w O )Ui o (n > Id m Ra 4 m b O p o y, o L .1 •d a) 7 y, O U b) -.-i 1 •rl f F i (d la a) A 10 O O m U A U q 23 ri o ,I m U -H m A U "1 U N .4 bt 4 ri 'd G w pp 3 o z) t}i C rl X ri !d 3 W ) Oi s a) x O -n Id m •rl o A G o H o W W W Id 13 U) U W 44 O U m )1 a) 44 Id O 0) >1 H A o 11 a m m -rl .1~ E1 o m .u )i o s a) P4 w W (d L) m SUi 0 a N [Za' W 41 Id L U) N H o p, U a) u iJ m Q/ Ol t71 4 C U ,G g 11 ro O 3 H H n. N m ).i U m 4 .U m m O 4 •0 m q rt ~i .L; J-) W O X N A u rd .4 a -,-i m 4 4 O r-i bl 4 •ri N a1 in, yt U 0 •Eg w ,-i ri ro N 0 M bl O C) 2 O U) Hai N U z U H a{ rx W C> O w m C o -H a) a m W U O C O -ri C •H '1 .u a N a) O U 4 O m O U 3 O) a) L A u m y{ H ri N m u ro U G O N G a LL w W to 'Zi O H m m H U W H . U L m Q) b ?1 a) li 0 U x G 'h H N 1~i C4 .a 0 x v 4 U 4 v H _ 14 o O J-) -r+ O W 1 a) -.i 1 ~4 at a) }.1 N a 'd A m O u (1) S1 m -rl 'd 4 a a) u 4 O U N F -H m C ro i ,H 'd .4 U aS .C F r• a 7 4 0 U 4 N '0 4 W U (d -r-1 > w O L G O a - m 14 m a) >i -r+ U 7 o A rt x ri u W X4 U L m N w 3 C O Q) 7 •rl li •d (D rJ fd U O ri Q ro )4 W G ) u Q m a) .4 .u O L y N 4 U ro .G U •d G it U m ro 04 X Id 3 Id Cn a) A F O U) 2 E- 7 H 4t O u •r1 U u 2i N 'C) O >1 In Ol U m to r-l N O U G bl c O 0) G (d iT (y u m a) L -rf 4 O ri a7 > -ri N ,r1 U N a) > tT O U b E S-i ,C W fa C O 0) m •r1 rtf U Ll m H a) Q O O •r1 'I} rd Q U m ?i L m „ H u N w H y O , i v G N b N > 'O a3 • ~l rt G al td ,G O U - H S1 td m a) 11 a) m m R) U 4 •r1 L m a) Q H 11 Q O 3 y f0 U O ,Q ..C L ttS 3 .C L M H rn .-1 N r1 d~ ltt to r m m. O .i N r1 cM r O -i N d~ lfl .i .1 .-I N ,y ti ti '1 ri N N N N N L L H b x > a N H d 7-, .07 N 40 1) -H U O ? G 4 N to 3 H G N > u Q) Fu{ N .u 0 k ~u1 C p it (d a) 44 ;j H b1 N 1) !i .~4 -4 97 N U) N U b w r-4 m jj -1 ~l a) u C o 3 u u td W o -14 5[., H H 3 fd { N o H JAJ. o b, ~i r. G 3 N fFi O N 44 N Q) H H L U O ro N N 1i $ (d -4 X ro H b 4-i L N a) f'. ri al ro 3 H N 1) •-f N G H b fd N W y,., G 41 3 ~j G 0 o O :j H U) O O '•4 O a a) o •rl cd H o 1) ,H 44 -a 3 0 r ll .r{ V1 .H N L N G X. O X Sv G 44 k -4 O X a) N N U 'A -li qq Bpd u A N a) b) (d H Ij 10 C: m 41 (1) N m rt N G aC, roq y b 1 a) 41 C u u li u s L rti a 11 t1 3 o C r H U w O 04 -1 rtS o a) b A G '(4 N p, 7 k fd ,2 rtf U 0 H rd (L) g-, 4J fn 10 ~4 ji li d H U) a y o v o x 0 o w ,ii w 8 d) O ( i G o N N A ~7 ai a) O ro v r: N N U 11 H X o C .U u H 3 0 H •O zzW o M U '4 i 4 .,A N p Id p 44 •O H u G O N vi a) b) O Z W 1) ro H 3 10 d (d 0, En Li A U -14 t3l a N °u w > w L L O to N of W H a) N a) L H H a) ai 0 X N H O O cn N L a) O H G C N 0 O (d w u C o 4) H N h L x C , O X 44 N y " y ro N U) od a A a Z F4 Ea O d) Z w w a 4 m G L 3 H r a) ~ 3 4) + a ro w° ° m > a m Id m u or G N E a h r-1 N b al to U a) 0, W O G x u N N a) H W H O N ) C, a3 E A O uuj ' k ~ aa)) -.Gi a) ,~a+ U V Z F W H •r N -i ..7 H a1 4.) iJ ai w yi vii L -0 N H O JEI 43 11 U Id 'U a) a) H q G b, H O r .D L ,G U U 2 a CL) m H A X L 44 3 H O H u !A 5 O O 0 41 ro q u N C N N u 'u 0 U) U) W 3 G; a) g ,d y A N G a) a) N H A 'O o C 0 y .G o N 1) 0 O a3 U H+ -.Gi H R) N N 41 41 X (d 0 H 11 C. -4 U 4 V2 f a) . G H C3 2 1, :j 4J :j 0 -H -H > 0 O b 4 > H m of - a O b R' ~ a -4 LU H a fj (7 N 11 tT H u) 3 W A 3~-) W .)C a) H N m a v, .o r m m o H N m a ,n .o r m m o N rn w H- rl N .-i .-1 H N H .-i N N N N N N a/ U) „O.) 44 to r: 41 0 o G a a '0 ;j , xi 0 ro 44 y -H .OU b n ro v Id b) N 3 -a tl 0 L a) ~ }4 o ro -H W o .u N ri H L y -4 H o G w a a~ H N G .G H O al N O r-I ai H b) y.i H ~ Jj 1J y Q) 44 1a H b) a) H pp o v -H ~4 4 a) G ai O w 41 -'4 tn ii Q) 0) -4 i b -H it r N o O rd H o -1 5 -4 >1 w 1) > R3 H H G pO a) a ,G 11 H F,' G -.-i a a o U N N 4-4 a m rt r. j~ 'cd 3 :j tn O N G L to N H N ~j Id ji A -~Gi qoq H ra -4 N a) Ca H q 'O to ' o z A A N -r a l N o x a o A > vo > 1u C G V 0 r Id Jz: 7 a C O W U q U A i o G fd U .H [ >1 0 0 w >4 N N ri or U ri fd H Id a) C7 p Q )4 Ha) H Q) R q u u O T) .u rt 1d 3 to H N 3 H H W~ Q i o O m •d to ?i ro N O 'd H O O) [x G O x 3 ro G -H v O (n a) O w H a ro ro x •:i 1 U) a 3 G 0 H to N a a N w z G H O O H G O F rd -4 C N A -.Gi N H I N a A -H X u N ul N H O U > J 4 (d 0) 1H N O O E 0 a w m F a) 0) U A O b tP G H ri O H U G' -En U rd Id a 11 G N o U O N 0 4 p 0 m 0 (V o CjG G u 4-! X fo 71 Q) L N N Q) Ori V a) 21 16 .-1 `O rd N H •.t C O H H .,1 0 3 b > a v ai ro > W 4a 71 a a) C c o x a o L L o H r F N V m U o .i 1J N y N ar H rt v 3 H > b H b N 1.4 li 4 v w ~ Fi i 1 G t-1 3 ~ i ~4 r) 14 rd -,i (D '0 A 1 ' 3 a) a) S o O )if f., 3 rt a 3 w u o H ~ 0 a) ° ) ~ lr 0 .G ri 1 .1 ~ k U 1, w ~ N N a) r-I N 3 3 ° 0 a i C ; a -4 N ro U 4-4 a ~4 J A 3 3 3 b J U 3 a) w 14 w o a) O b w " IZ 4 w N c!) O. 0 a; a) W o ~ O ri cV \ m N N .H zoror~. H U) H a) 0 U ~ z cam) H t1 a oz C) .H a w ~.t H 0i W N o ro o r-t N3 m N N 09 H u) H a) 4 v 7 z4 H AS a ~ W m oz a a v~ H m ai a) 10 w a) A I m U N u 'o G a) m a) ,-i A 3 id G o (D H a) v 41 (d •W m H •u G 1 m m U H H W ll N O 0 > m z7 m w " v ro ° u v v ) v H 3 u o ro v rn a o 0 m m o u o 0 m, > ~ N N O ~ O 4 1 A Q C > N Q) C ~4 > ,G •r i w to m ~j a) v 4-t o - u o m , u m v 10 O w ri rtl o v H G w > 11 a m a) x v a) 0 1 v > v 4 G .N m C: m b H • C - m v 0 b 5 v N N Im 5 4 •411 I -4 b a i N (d c G H H >r E •r, , G 41 H 3 0 N U7 3 -I V N N H 0 a) . 0 o v O 3 3 >1 0 0 N 1-4 y U ~ G G 0 0 0 0 > v H 0 rP m >t b) m )1 31 > H 4 X Z ro ~ a -i z ro j v m H 'O 1 )-I m m •ri 3 O H a) 4 'O m ,G 3-i .V O O N a) v N W N O .U H o N •H m C S O U li R N G' rtf }a G N N Oi '0 O m u M H a) v G O R, w A G m G G C, G N m rtf o o m O w 0 4J G >1 4 i, 0 i+ a 0 O to ~1 w O -H -H - >y a) 4 A m w 11 m ii w ° d a N v ~ U A H ° ~ rt u b 1 S4 b 7 - U w • i a a U ~ m o m 4J ~ v m N 44 3 °i 4J O -I m rtt o r: y > - t $ -r i m b G H v m G 3 H U U O 0) A - !4 m ?4 ro ,C m ca y H •a li G >I H U o a) A .u (1) u C v G ^ ~ L a) m ro 3 m L) (L) 3 q d a) aA, a m a m A bl w A m u X •11 v ,G m A p' U L •H •ri $ O U N 14 m U - X L C: N •H G H m 3 m u 1) d m H H ?i u O O m ° H (d G 3 - m O s o - G $ H o m y z q m H m (v w w :1 a o G w H A v N o v t+ to o to a a) n o a) 44 G rti m U) H L )-1 w S4 o sa Q, w A o a N u ro C r 0 4 a G -.-i 4 D ~ 1u 4 a) -ri O O •H 4 H FC o 41 u o 0 ~ 11 b G N rd u O w 3 O 0 0 41 m •.i m m A N to m N o U .G L o •rl X U G FC N w 1 m O F -H U (A w N v A .q L w 3 a ~p a) •,1 l) G v > A 'U G u o (u a) w > 3 w w 2) G H m $ m tT A H o A ) b w o m m w a m H o > Sa m m H 11 m o X U to Oi o -4 v a o v m ) I U1 a a) .U •H a) JJ a) 3 U 13 m O G 0, 1 3 m L to U U to m 7 L m m G O H >r N N L I i 'O >1 1. _YV H a) tm W H JJ w m S4 1 1-4. j.. N y N ,r.. S', C. X .G O a) N 1 .U 3-i p, u •H ,G O U) H 1`, a 4 (d A 44 b1 N U J~ 3 `O H H N r1 sp N ,o m rn O H H .-1 N H r.t .-I sM N U1 H tp .-1 - •i m .i O, H O N H N N N rn ~ N N N N H N r~ ° U L j 'O ° )-I • y , m to w b H ~ ~ H .C C .-i 4 a) 0 I o N H u o > 8 H es m ` 'i o o .O (d o m •rf •H .u m - m G to f~ 41 41 v s4 m G G 3 m 'o A 3 m t}1 7 k O r4 O w w H v L v O O v D3 O a) to m H Id O (n a N O to u H 1) Fi a m G ~1 v ri w 1J o u G G o H CO d Ai ril o 0 3 - N v a G 14 m o v A u to 23 ° 'O to (D :>A 0 M n 'A a) b ~ 44 ~ 3 U) to id r4 v J ) 5 4 o 44 ro 0 0 -.°i G > N U) o N N N H > C .G o F'j m N N G O o >x O -H m -4 w -H m v H w to L rn U m •r) w (D iJ rd •A 3 O H W O k a -.i w E U pp H H r•i .O cd m it N N G v ' •G Q N •-1 a w H 3 z Id (d C v N w u •ri R, S I o •u r ,!ti u 1.1 G o w rl o H Ed (d rd G O H ° d , L 'j $ . H - •H . b O G W )f m -H H m o o G o m i m v H a) o ro v H u A f x H U G 3 o Q) N G w al to , H a) o w N u v b o to rti 3 to ti w w b U w > yl v O z) c 41 ro y V 3 7, G •a o v b w ° v w w w m u o o m A a) ro ro rd ~ 'o v N u G o A + x U H 'O x U x O o G + o G O m a) m ro m v m G v a v v ~wj v H 'O H O A-) U a) a) E O ~C U Z .zd a) U O U a) b .4' O L X. " H - u X U .H U to L 1 L O O rl a) H H W m m 0 . o o ° G m ~ x a ~ o ro )4 o , > o p , w > c w c w H v w o a) n 3 w W co m to a W W o H ? v u O > G v G v W X 4 z H 2 W m N a) H H A •H b o aa u i o 0 H o to H v o 41 m U m m q ' N > (d o z iJ a H .a U H U) ~ 0 to H ~ 0 ro O O •,i ~ E. U cn i+ h v N L FC v G L m H N U 7 N o (1 . ri H O Q) H a) >1 N o O N id a) L v to m X > ' t ~ L o rx~ u > m 0 3 ~ u C ~ G q rd 14 m o U o G a w U U H w ~ H w ,q o H >a a v o v ,q m ~ ~ S, El C: H v a m ro u a rn ro x yk 4 H N 0 Xf L rd > rd rd Cf) i a E N c . 10 b m w m m R y L a H li -ri a N N F-i -.-1 b N U U C: Q 0 LI lJ H 1) a U O ll .r{ L N al ll m - ro G ro ?4 0 H k a) C m o r 'o ~j O Q .r: u 0, .1 a m ro r v .4' Q o C o 0 1J w 'O (J t) m 7 U m S1 U) L tT 0 m N (5 N ri M cl' Ui •n r m O , r i Vt o hi ~I' to o m F4 m ra w w b N t N L m am) ° ~ .14 A N N ° 3 a) IH Q4 U .14 N m -H L JJ W •G )d ~a -ri ~1 G' A G m H o si q .u 5 .C x o o ° vd O m -ri 'U H N S ..r a1 O -H Sa N N y 10 ro ° o ~4 n 1J 11 a o d 04 ~4 :J It U N a 10q N o 3 m ro u u w o Ga 3 d ,Ld a m a) ~ O .C 14 aa)i U to ° a) Ij fo a q z of G L o x ro En ~4 14 m -4 :j a) !.1 m N L .X m a) m G b ,5~ w u o .H L A a~ -r+ F4 U u a~ a u x' Id Qi 44 ~ ro 10 0 m 44" -1 a a fd 44 " 1:1 0 ° U ~ N rC, Li U o° m ~ , G o m 3 u G y m 3 ~ xi+ N rmi aS O' .u ANJ O U p r: (d a) 1-1 m N 0 .C O v 3 a) .A •k W ~ H R m M ro Id a) U L O 4-1 k a) a) Id -r, 1'A N N ri rd .G i) :3 U a) m o 0 h o 0) m r 0) a " A q b b a .0 N JA-) N H w rom .04' O N yr ° O Id O O m S, -.i rtf M 0 4i 3 m G p, N U N U .C-,1 a) d P m H 0 O L" L a 'O ,H c -H m o o u 0 a °a ri W O m Q) Si U) S4 S, A m ,j m m , 3 oq N-, •r, 3 1°, h -H jlj 44 w m b A z N o D „ a a 3 h o y 1-4 O ri 3 b+ r i- G tom, b) N G O, U 44 N 'C ••i 7 G al O ri H C: Sa N O m O W -ri r, u b d -H •r{ • i a) b) g u v 3 v k a 1 4 r-i 4 ~$4 m U x u a) 4 Id 0 (d a) Id p w G R A Cb m R, U m .-I e+f V ut ,o m m O H N ,•1 7 to b .-1 H .-i H r1 r1 .i N 'O O u N O 1d o U N m L is a) ° O ) ~a m a rt 3 G 44 O) a H m C P -H % 4 Q) r l ,--I , y r w ro 3 N m a) 2f p h m L L L a i u a~ o -4 Q' a O A m 44 1) co 3 rt N U a) } J at 41 0 0 U ~ ro rd A H o " a rsf u rd u . H A 44 R Id H y m G , g ' 41 0 o G , y FC U) 3 a) G (d a) U N E 0 m id 3 )i (t L) d S w ° H m 3 I b g ,d 41 m (d C7 i6 li N a) N G RS N a U H P+ U) C. ,d N 5 U) 11 0 N FI L a) .0 O L C7 ri Id L i ?A AS G N r-i 4J ul U) 41 J- 1 ° n 0 H Id ° W ° O yJ I;p L 0 V U N 0 -A )-I m O N ~s 43 0 ow p 0 r. 10 U) x a G W b 1-4 H v o) 0 ° 4 O 4 C H a L1 rn 3 .r, r .i m H M .i o N H N N N t'i N W N N m .14 U o h C F WW rz W F H u o 'O H a U L U •ri i 04 m a) a Jj C' •4 O m X ro H it O t c4 N 1 rl Id mC A N w M (d U ~4 )d m a N O St G N a) b -C m .U .i a3 it a) r, . A 3 }1 id [ U o ~ W G N m L y ro H H TI) O U u m -13 N 0 w G d rd ) O 'n a U w b, -.C-t O U m a~i m a) O •H LJ N O a W .4 a L En L 3 rm, Q U O w 00. N > a) 0) 3 ~ L L C o H •H N to 0 m " 1 w G -ri m 7 O' k ,4 C w >'t 4 b N ra J ~ ~ G Q) O ll m G N - a) N .C 11 m h $ rl w to y H H W..7 c4 W ~ H C4 H U 0)) f6 a0 L b N H , RS L 4" 4 O N N . x H t9 W U1 H ~ .i IJ m H y a3 U N H 44 H u) h U ro H -ri C h SH-1 Oa N a u C R] m a q O a m i ° y m m A ro m -H ?i a m -rGi a) m p (L.' H N N ~C C r. o o H li -li H H m O v m o G A .ri H 'a b r-i L 3 A 44 ..a L , n r, c vi b r- m m O r (A bi ro w m o . ro o ar li 0 4J to G w u G A m R A , n b Si ° ❑ b m A i i m " 41 N oi r m O L m CN -H 0 41 3 a U N A N N 1 X . 7 O N N U , N aS y, rt m mq y m ~ A 3 ? p )i )i N . ) a N H a 3 t u 3 m y m En m m C d ri ~ R G H t N 0) m U m m •r-i m C m u m H .ri N > A o 0 o m m RS W FG U N O U ri A N .C C U 0 " i U L O N d 7., L A m E' 3 +a 'a q H 0) m G w 7, rt5 o -N w ~ X Si O S -4i N b m _ a ~d U) P i 0 C bl L v 7 O C O C O •ri , Q) ul m L U) b > m O 2 m U m y m E: m a o G u to O H C H W N Q) T H 4 U) 'O Q) N L li y Q H N H N 7 O O 5 O N G A G U ~ A A rtf U . ro H m m Q) Ol id ut N it ri o e ro N m o N L 2~1 H O in J.! 3 0 [ w w .U b1 H U U U N 0 N O X N L U yr C w O .d R7 O (4 it d .U 3 •H o o zJ H C'.. 41 d H IJ H N H I: N -H /~Y 3 N 11 'O 5r N ll 11 ro H w ro -H of O :j j N y N H U) L •G `O `0 •H 11 N •H 'O y 11 td o j~ G G u ro L •H u N 11 X O .u w q 0 3 C ri O 4) •H m .1" H w •C -H U a (d .d 0 rt1 C) H 0 x ro 41 .X - a 0 0 w rd .U u -H D •d rtf 0 d) G •d S4 m 1) 0 25 l1 N C 4J -q 11 y b N H ro 11 ,-1 44 ,1 Sa 0 w 0 H 5 i4 O C 'O G .u ro b a1 u) d •H 04 0 x rd X -i A O o o G 4N1 4ti N 0 3 0 w m w 0 11 0 •H ,-1 A N w rtt u 3 o ?4 3 o u (d u [ H (d yrt~d 0 m L y q~y+ fu 3 v w la 3 ro ~ H 1-1 0 0 4) (d 101 a) X N 3 L m 01 O (d -13 p1 m Ch (V td A 14 U 14 04 5 O L) •H C a) ro ?4 •H 0 U) 'd O to as C 0 0 0 -H 0 O 0 ,G b) 4v w N CL - G' to r. w 00 H HA 4H-144 U U N N o N N 4 4 03 En .,I v 'd Id H N 1-4 Jj•1 Il 0 rd N U ro ~ 'd w F4 L 0 0 H k CL 0 54 L :J 0 0 d •H @ y y A N w 'J U N 'd U 0 E. g Sk y O A 11 0 0 0 01 U w o C N (cf rd 3 o N •d .d w d w H >1 0 d m 0 al 4J N N RO 10 (d O -H N N m O •H ,d H H O 0+ H ,d ro m y 11 H qq 0 N N bt H (d k y m L 3 .d 0 ro 1-4 54 :j (d o w m m o m C H G H ro m w 11 !4 L O 0 .d N H b) H •H •H 10 O W ~j b) w -H 0 ro U M 3 3 w .d 0 o 10 \ -H 3 11 d 4 u of m 0 0 y m m [ 11 a u H o 11 w u H u b) rd u -H S4 4J H G 11 11 b U •H u b +d X G u N m 1J 11 •H •H 43 4 O 11 H .u d ~ 11 0 -H O .d bl S4 A 'O 0 ri (d A .u •H all w 41 -H d N A (d m N O O b b >1 w •b .d Ji.3 4 A U H O N O •d y 4) N LA W H ~ H 1i ri H td $ A N 0 A m w O -H 0 ri H. H H 11 •H 3 N 0 a, L w m A b 0 ?4 O ,5 •H H 7 > 3 R m p H u 0 w m y ,d o 11 q R .d R 3 z 1) to O H a) L O y .0 w G O 11 }4 FC L 10 O R'f .H O O N O 41 H ro N U w `O 0 w :j 0 S 0 (D 3 a m 3 U C 'd 34 w S 1) .d m o .d 3 41 a) u o u u 41 w m w 0 w w O 1-) H y u to (d L as ri m cd df 45 d 4) A d .d C 3 a 0 (d •H d .t2 td rl •d ,4 b) 4 . S4 w L (d 41 ~ O ?L d 4) .d O) U 0 m 2 0) Y1 H d C.' 41 w - W 9 U St G' rtf ty 11 2i 0 11 0 •H w 4 O 0 U JJ U H ,d O •H ji qq 1.) .d U 11 R y m d U .d u .q 3 t3l N •C N b1 •L -H m m 1wi 4 .,4 w d G w ai .-~1' k Id 90 H d H dpi :1 m to S4 L .U W m U •H 'J H O Ch bt •d (d ~ • { ro 0 •H -H ro L w X m o m C m w G L 21 44 1) ro N ,Q $ 0 0 (d H G' C •H N A •H 0 N 0 m u H 4) (d NE U ?1 N H 4 1 L 0 C 4f to bl N u li N 41 b w u G 3 N li ?4 uro L cud aRi lui b b) 10) rd y H N 1,1 ~M Ul tp t` m O1 0 N M W N b m 01 o H N to vN i() H H H H H H H H H H N N N N N N 10 :1 2f 0 H .U 41 4 l 0 r a! N a) ro U 1000 w D w N 0 ~ o fd b r ,40 1 1" 11 G rd 0 3 bt .d 74 r m .d d m U to .0 $4 N U C 41 }4 O< -H H •H N O N m 0 d C H 0 U O 0 O R7 A H ,d m : >1 0 U •H O ri n. g 41 0, 44 L' H H 0 li N P w id O to H C rtl U 4) 1a w 111 -,1 R •,l U C u v1 l to D 11 u G 3 .ri L to 11 Id .d O :j L d .d u :3 y m ).i 54 w L w 1 1J m N H 411 L •d-1 N 0 'd O } p A Imo: yi r. o 0, O w -H Id NmN 4 Id w .x m rl o 0)i -H,+ 1.01 tr r i 4 w 0 d o 1J N 1) d H U) u 41 •H y y u w 0 -1 m o m o Q )X •H 11 G m 11 m H (d u m N R d o q H a) m u m Au d o m U 3 11 m .u - m w N z3 m y -H >a ro b -H U (d w 1J 0 (d •H •H w O S4 4) H 4 H to O .14' W H R td Yn 0 R' w H N !b U 7 3 41 131 ¢1 o a ?4 u -4 (mod H X G }4 0 d 0 N O O N y A D U N 0 0 •H O .d H 0 w 11 yy U W 0 G 0 O y m O 0 Sr k v O i~ U U 0 d O O _r_ ro w u O 10 '0 Oi U 11 O b) O m v 0 ?1 O 1) Si U G y1 10 yi O to •H 27 .d ti R, 11 E o m .u 1) w w w a) rl a) U 3 ~ L d 0 C 44 q 0 ~ w •,l N N w H u 00 ci 0) C c ° .3 -U,( ?rot L ,cod 0 o ro •1Hi w o b u0) ~dq 'o .rou H (d L) N -mi 0) 10 0 w O N E dmi U N h doi m 0 Id •H Q1 (d -H 4 w Xq t) 11 0 C U. u J^ H U >J 3 11 41 4 0 m •H U w X w w m H N Q) A H 0 N N 0 id 0 N H CL H Sd X •H ,C W 0 /y' 1) U ro 0 H 1) y O .d w w 0 m ro H a b m -H H (d r4 'O 0 x N w K d 01 3 0 3 5 W rd H 1 O (d 4 y 5 H 1 G 54 u L ro w S4 0 o A w w .d 1z u o u (d -H w (d H .U H , O 'O X !a 1t N W 54 4 0 y 4 4 44 ~ H w , N C r4•H O w H o vW 4) Z ro m m 11 0 .u U O C9 -H oh , -0 O m .01 r 0 H N 3 ° 0 .04 b (X11 .d N 0 W G N v RS y m w m 3 W 11 N H o m -C! 2 N r p 11 C 0 U (d m .U N 0 -H >v 5.1 X aS w u N m w .d N tZ H a~ U .C q 3 4) 1r H 0 N w C w '0 .d 11 CL H 11 11 -H 1r r6 Z L .U (d - -H ,f'.. N a 1-1 •H w Rd m y -H 14 U Pa L 11 A'~ 10 N 3 Si x la o O O N y N U % (d m w U a A A to li u g U u l m 3 ,QA m G ti U) O (d ll - u w U A U -H y w .ri U :J y d _C: w 3 m m w 3 G d N m o L R 3 0 0 U) L 0 0 H 0 O o, -H L ro m v > w tr li b A a H m x 10 .G H 0 :4 W N u u C H H N L a) G 41 L L L v 11 O w w r~ -H w w 11 w m G A 11 H m m u w b 0 m N 7 •H Qi x ~ x 3 m r- O CZ '0 Rr m w 0 U L U O 0 0 0 .rl iC _r_ )J ~j -ri rd .C O O O .C 1 .-1 0 H 0 m 10 1i m 0 0 23 o ~ N H \ g M N N H H O C H rd U) • H 0 d U N z 4 H ro L a a m 0 z a H N Oa ~ H 0 s4 m 0 o ¢f o r-) N -li rn N N \ H H H O C H td H a) ~y U N :1 zu a ro a a to o z Ln N o - H d m ~ H ~ v N Y H O bi [ ° A N C w o : L 3 -A L U bi tn ro 4j ° ° bi :j .,i 4j to Y Q7 C H S' o 3 C U L O N Y 1 R1 y x 3 Y m o N C 3 i u a 3 +J 44 ~ o rts 2qqt -H ~4 14 --A -11 G d) .U a A N o G rtf q W A~1 Q7 ra o w x x N j Y o -4 d 'i7 U) o H ro w o.-4 ri lj W N w qN t~ 4{ -ri Q y..~ N H O td L N bf 5 Vl ro r) 11 A L U H Ul A d) O in rd Ej -d rd 4j O N N H u a) Y O H 10 c: Y W N ta U 3 }4 Ul 0 ) Id ~ n. .-i S, U Y O 3 D L C -I ° x u a ~ .--i .--t m o A w Y a a v n m + q:j z 3 ° N ~ o H Y (d o N Ln y W Y A N i U 3 i o H 3 4 x ~ rd to U H u 4 U 4 -A X 4J ~ ~d N N ro • Y N m ro 61 ro H ' x Y m u N ro Y id . p 1-i N y w 0) 0 aN o 3 (1) En rn 10 01 0 14 0 0 1d w to rn q o b o w 3 7 0 o 0 u v ~ G O ~r Id ° ° x Cd , in u N u i 'd U) .,A 4j v v o ~ 3 it .C b, p 3 ; c9 N v m x ~ G " s~ a) w Ij (1) 4j (d A4 0 G x , . id z U G o it X! w (1) 3 ro u ~E: a o q 0 a N o 5 u W N 1°1 p o H N o 3 o 0 a v x U u H ~ 3 H F: > w u) N u N 01 W x} " CL W O u H to 7. J-. H -I 4 b ~ O aw-l, > 04 ~ !A'.1 In 4 rtl 1'4 4 . W - 0 -.~'1 Q b o 3 C N N H 1 4 X . 4j x o + ) o w FC c n H H o N ❑ N FC m L w C o C N w H r1 }r bi 0 C r •H Y bi O S• r1 H H p; i al ° p y ` C7 'ci N . Y L ~ N U i H O A a C y w ~ b A' 0 q~ .-t d Y y W H o1 44 o fn W U U U ~ C ' b i 11 C 0 .C u ,2. r C U? 0 N M O . i Ol U1 P. 0.f W c% 3 f4 w FC o A q Y H 3 bi rd r Y Y U d S Y y u k o id H O Y N .i Gf o .'i O 1d Y -4 0 la 0 y~ N x N V Y ro rn Y Y -A { ~i 4) id 4j H A d U RS N W Y L id .1 1 li - $ Y ° U .U l4 Id 41 C) W a N in a ir1 io r m m o H N r1 vi 1o r m m o H N m N V u1 N N o id Id o ~4 Q) O Y 14 41 ° " 0 O 1~ 1 . i" o N N o y N y . Y L N ~4 -H u Uj 3 - O ) Y Y Ol N 4) 1~ O N 1 0) 41 ol -H m rd U) 1 -H > 0 U H L C 3 4 tai G 3 m rA m H q . N 1 4 (d 0 ~ rtf S t co w ri a) w 3 T1 ° a ai u u 3 H G U A :3 Ai W o jii v v , a o 2 ro a 3 Y v ro 3 3 N O Y O , O r W '1 N ri . 3 ?1 u L O H O 4 Fi N S N N Id Id H N X t'. 7 U1 x nt H ° yj ro b ~ -1 p '-1 ro 41 ul O n 4J (D td O U a rt N W 3 . i w •C+ H O ~4 Q) - N ' " u W -ri Y RS ~j- J+ N x G4 Y 61 U N D o A C O s 4" H ~4 go O Q) 0 a R1 H .0 .s; O1 H .U h O u 3 O Y C En m -4 O P Id U Y ~ N O W N S y U) ~ H Qt ~j U Id Y b N Y N H C ~ Rf U >j N ' - O ul a) U > ri U •ri U U id Qq S 41 O W O H 3~ w - O b •.i Id W 'D u Y Si N rt U N u N n id ~ A -H to W N w 0 ° q 'N 0 ; 1 H .C H Y 10 w En N b1 01 N i~ N N }-i o -N N H .H z u w w 3 m w rt o ro w H o -H TS m O U Y N U u ro u o' H F'' W' N 44 U Y i 7 N •N Id H 3 Y N N H b N •G G •r i W A ro 4^ O U H O 11 ra (U .a '3 A w o U' .G o D o 3 1 ' N Y rtf w o 3 w S' a U) N W C q W u cd J co a 4 v o w O C g E' ' w 1 0 o b r 0 ? [n 21 g Y O z A L r 00 Q A 0 t a N Yol .H -4 W N 0 C o H cd N H , j A E v U H O1 b1 V! t A 3 0 H R' N H ~ •Q C7 H o O x t'C.I w 3 w C o Id ' Y li 0 b m ' 7 o p4 N U) co H b U ~ry u w 3 ro s t to u O A ~ f~ al • U a o u ° u o ° u U u [ w U ° o > o H u u q ro w m v b 0 0 (d o x v o N ° O ll Y d U) u C sl C A .C -N a N U C 11 N N a ro O N '•i L u JJ (n O N 11 N O N C rd O O N O U rt H U N y H t: H 11 CL C. N U ?1 G U -ri N 1t , id U X N U i C E N rd 3 01 U O O -.i v1 N N G Na A b U rt3 A w 10 a A uli N G 0 0 J 4~y m ~ }-1 F4 U N N rl twtl si pp N H 0 S fd w L u u u m w u .C fd n• U w w H •n 2J G' . K. N U w N u U fd " w fwd a W fd w i, U w w k s; ro 1 A A u u u w to W A w fd fd w w u u u o Q) 1J }4 G 1-i z U o ar 2S u w .G O fd O a1 X m iJ to q •H w m :1 m T1 N O u 1-i m G u 7 w 7 1 .u 1.i 14 N w li fd JJ o ro ~1 14 .G w m m u 0 w L 4 ro x w w •.f f.i •11 O w w ::j U w w w A m a w O k to w m li Ro o (d H w C~ •r~ w w 0) m v o u w u fi Rs o o x w O C `u O G x w w C •r♦ w w w > u a RS ~j w ro o G •,f W G 4 m ~ G fd O A w L w w U N O v N ri O u 441 b ~ O w w fd w c l)-.1 E q u m u ~j m G O ro 01 A i-i L > N }4 H G o •,4 u 11 rf 7 •rf w 3 U w li w w w O o X L m w zi ro b fd to 3 > b w L ro o L m > (d q w w u O G H u C { Id m w G d O m $ fd w w •.I rd •rl fd - 01 of .q o 3 S, -4 A .-i w 1-i x U r-I O 11 N 4 U U w L to 43 i b Id G •ri !-1 u fd G u y .C u fd N li .C ri cn ,-f ~j w A w u m 0 w u .G 2n m w w •.I >1 i S H a a li w H > m B O .G Ol H N q -i C iJ O a w G in •rf u L .i O w 3 G W i (C5 U 3 w n. -rl w u td d w A O 3 u U -rf ,G u ~ H m fd u g 0 u Ei fd a.f o P; w tm m u w 17 > Id u ~ 4 O o o 1.1 w w w .G ro u lA c ~ o w O H 3 S4 Yi 0 w U G ~.7 O li 4 O }a O O m m 1-i w N W N w P: m Ju o o m 17 4.j 0 w0 2A o 3 U w w' > o 'O p G u (d x 0 ~4 w C4 w 1J S., m ,c Id w o w S.t O t"i w m O P~ 07 m w m N H U R ',Zi w N w 4 L o 44 d O U) N C9.u is o o lj ro u w w awa o m aio O W r, W O L w _A H ai H S4 -I b U to rt N JJ v w ri -ri m 1i >t H W 'O .i a 3 u ro o 2n 3 ro m A fd o w 2n 25 17 'O •G O N Sf H w G m w m A u A u r>~ H fd fd A-' O H > w fd ..i H .U $ m J.7 a w m fd N w s~ fd q ri w G w O 1~ O O G w N •.i N W N O w v u O w G > d m w rd p U .G G w {y O G H .,j fd u U w o w o o .c w w li o .G o a 0 U U >1 .a Id A •.i r .u m 3 H E. -r1 ..f •ri fd A ll v 1) 17 N •ri 01 L .U M U C w L H Id G .G U O r (d m 0 Id C`. •.f v to A O to G Q) Jw L" w 'd H U 1.i p -H u o ~ bf fd ro bi C N -.1 •.i al 271 1:1 •.i w fd 1.1 ..i -d a iJ 3 14 O H O r-i p ri 11 w •ri m i C w m 0 m 0 U m a 01 U a$ a u y G ::5 •,A > w L) d) N 000 (vu) a w w .u a w w o l.i o c fd u U) 10 Id U) U m m ro b fx Q m b m 10 u ..f 3 li N N l.i ~ ifl b F m Of O N N Hi W IJi b F m Qt O H N f•'1 W iti H H .i ei .i H .-I H .i .i N N N N ry N 4) 0) 10 o }-i J i m t S~ A ~ } N O 0 t7 w O C w O >1 rd L U w G m w 3 w H 41 H }-i W O 4 41 x to G G U) > H ~ v rd d •ri tl m ~ d 41 i „ ..4 ~3 ro 17 ~i w u w -ri {4 w 2d W p O O O (d r! w O xi w m .O x ,c 7 w 3 w H > ~w 21 01 rd •O w O H > w U > 3 4J o J-i O E N w V to ll 2qn E:-f w Hqq (P rtf O •.qqI rd 2.,-• 1J H A w U JJ ffmdd I w •.i .i Id (D 0) rA ~4 Q) 4j '0 n .c 1271 H H N fd •.wi N Id b 01 r•i m N 3 N .C to p 107 R In U .U w H > C w c :j Rd 1: L •rl a m U fd •.f O m A W N +J 31 x W C .U m V w li N 01 N O w O O to O -ri N c m w w G H + H F4 A wE m O O a00 11 u r 11 .f A o ci 0 41 Id En 1-4 r-I rd -li -rf C: r i N 4 •O u ° m I,' ~ rn Ul !-i fUd w F.1 }i v o0 o H w 3 L .°u ~r H o 4 A u w G ro ri > w o A f L 01 11 m f u C H w U U a fd > W •rI it :J O N G 2f v0 ~ w Uw N N .C w d m m O Id O H I y7 w G A U) S-1 w li N a) b d m ; w > O 1 ~ G (d W (d N H O m 'U 7f G Id in -H 4 Q) H y w U •r1 x L > -N u b H ro w O L O ro s u 10 a u si o o d u 0 o -r1 c a m w a H L u O A m m E n o .U N N A ri A!i N w •e> O 11 (d -i 7 U bf 'LS m N ~ 2 O fa rd w b S4 O O w 01 O N O w N O m w .G r p C G W 1 5 ,G o s 13 : U R; U rli (d ua w H H p 'Of td tl yi fd •rl w O O A fd > m rl c L L A w H a Q) S i L b w -i w 1J 4 fd w fd m m o A ro fd ~ w N G -i 'U w G m a C 2n Li }-I c r; rt 3 r w m G N w a ri A m o 0 rn o m m o 4 o 5 ° a a ro y w •G uro w ro H S-i H H •ri m 0U 0 O 0 •O O H ~ C w- y m w C. m vi u U w 2T a w r, N f4 , zfi m .-1 0) to 'i > co m 3 C7 .H 0) u A O)p w H T Q H r0 •ri •.i .u C ?i q •O fd O Id 01 >1 m rd O Ol U N A U H o o b .C 'O H U o rt H -ll-i d o u o U C ow H .C .C O U S4 H C, -ri O O m H -14 N u m m (d m O -4 u W ~ •ri (d ro w w w A S m m o ,t~" L -r1 w ro o y A A m E t-i G rtt cn .G yl 7 U w fd li w y, L U rd aJ U 'L7 Id U) 2S 7~ S4 ,y O S4 > L w ro f 0a) 0 w w 4 o O A w rd m a3 ri ? .C w m A W S4 L ?i .r1 01 x u ll O fd w L X rO u m to w 01 O FI m .C Sa w 'O w .1 rd G }i W fa S: w 4 O O 0 .,1 J m O w G Q) C N 3 u i..i a o to u ,C u U ra 3 Al- Id -,i U 3 H 3 Id a' 14 o -1 f o N •a rn N N ~ H H rf O 2n H w 0 U N zv H 1i a a w oz U f 1 to °a v~ a~ H N o •O o ri N -.-t C N C14 o H to w • H w ER OU N zU H P, P, U) O z .a w O ~ H ai' I m w u d q 0 0 Sa (T .U b w A O N N O m ~O G X O 9 o ro u ~ A d O d G H N JJ > N L Id N H a N JJ H U H p ua O O m •H W t(d.' 3 •z N r! b bpi 3 •~i m b to 11 fd rd d) s o v 01 a o o to u v C O y 10 li d) O N N 1J 1.1 • 4 u En m Q 11 N O O H ,i U A d m L H m 4 U O 0 ~ d) L H H 0 U n En Id Id L Id F' 0 O y d 10 U 3 .N N N L L L O .i -1 V A W H ~ -A N N L d N G "4 N O N -di,-' H 0 N Ji O 3 u a) N ,i 0 X A L -o IJ A U) N u A q > i N d 3 E to 41 0 rd -4 H w 0 x N b 3 .Hi N a id C 23° id m JJ (d ? X ro •)4 w -4 b N u a G Ei u y, N .u d d) U .c N O H 3 o d d q ,C , li b) d w a d) m - H `C7 L) 11 11 A 3 L $ N H L U 13 d) 'd }4 •O m 1i X t) ,q N O id d b) d a3 > •H h cn o v L d U q a •.i n• .u 'O A G 3 3 0 .4 -H `d N O d H O d •H .4 L q a N m Cj -H W U Oi w 3 v x 0 N i x 3 .u q o o H nY .d 1) 11 L O O Cw9 d) 'O C7) X O Qwn A V 0 ~ 4 N d) z d u d m d C O a) 44 Li N ~q a) -H 0 ri td O O Cl H 10 .X X N O (0 A Id 0 u U L W o N 1i w r-i ~d 3 U O •H o tZ [A fx d 1J W d) O d) -4 O •a ro d) u 1-4 0 to o to to O r. H >i ri C C 0 ~ m a a m r. tyr a• H W O H tT O W dl o a w N U) W - m b) C H W m d tT > w z ,C: w •H N z •.~i S a) U X o -'4 G •w =s a 0) - 0 )j d ill E N O m 1) H 3 + d o u w .C ~ 4) H m N 3 N H in S~ I H X ,C U N d ~ O N N C o i ~ Q X u d) O bt iJ O N H H t> O 14 " " H O H C 'W aNi m •C Ij C3 0) ll 1d WE .r; .R O o H N U h L w q ~i •H a~ 4OJ ~ U ?4 O •,i •n 'd~• H O W O 7 d O y y tT .i d. H .C U d)(d > O -'>I >r d U U > •.i U O -A 0) t~ U G H X W `d O v CD N -4 (71 H L ° _ O U U 14 N v N L Cro U, rn w N A 0 u d 3 0 3 R 3 W 0 r4 3 u ° -i di 'd ON 3 41 10 0 m N o N O) U ro U 00! W N 0 N ,0 -4 O b w O O 00 N W W 4 X N A 3 Sb q A .1) x m H : .U 3 0 3 rl u O b) H r-1 N M V t1t iO r m m O N Nt a rl ei M H H e-1 ,-l N N N N N N w N m d) O d O ri N N N ~ ra 0 g H [A H N 0 U ~ h7'i U Id y a Ii H z c-i O ~ 41 H t~ a C i) x N q a) a O d ui d rn s ,d, y H ro a b L N d) y N H Q) ~4 C 44 0 b ii N 41 0 'O N U 0 0 d x 0 ~ > ~ ~ m > i q 4J i d O N T) . -H 0 i , N a ' ' 3 P Ga d a d O O N q a ri a X N N O t[ H o w N H W 3 O O N q ate' q CD 01 ' m W H u ? H yJ . - 1J U C. 0 C tU R N G o d ro o G y . , " d [ ri d! a ) d) $ 0) i -H . O b 'G p 0 a m d N s.) to N o ti d 0 ' • q 0 \ y j b a v x ~ H o rd 3 X O r) 0 0 0 u ~ m O " m d ) - i - u k ~ ro z d d b 1 .l 14 --t N w N N w H U )i N 'W .i O 4 m u `H , A ° 3 ro b H o Qj aj 41 z ro N i t O ?S 1 i O a :j F. .u d d H V N r' H d o' (a U O t d 0 N >i q r -i i cn u 0 41 , U d) q H ro 7 A ON _ W ~Q X ~ 0 •d H N 3 •Ai -rOi H N O -H , q t q z -14 a o r` u > a m d A U) N > y t R W td o a N i a ~i O d H X b d •mi a ) 0 7) Cn A .0 Pi O ww _ d .i~ 0 y o O ~ ww + U N •.~i .11 N A F 03 U z H -rOi 3 N N U• A i O tJ ,G .7 41 44 ?i O E N N 41 -.I 3.1 O a H U U) a H 44 a) WW d tn Q) Q) O d) W Si n• Q O H J d Z~ U W O -.i li L n L M to ° - 4 41 O Ow C x a o0i 'o m Q) w H' m o e~ N 0 a G ~ m d z ~ F ~ U tm 0) a U) m N m ~ w a to 4 w z m w A O o z ~ d a ~ ° o a Q) -4 o m ° u i Q) ° a O 4 n v y tn ° > c o z q) -•i d !a H N m u L O >i N N H N FC rn A O a H N W N N j( -.r-t (n -1 d m L a N Q o S O 0 4j U) . 10 Q) "i 1) G b ° N V N U N a m n. N X G u 10 N li V o Z U ro o a d~ N :1 U N L N d O d S4 u L w ?4 m 8 O N m O O C L O E ,C b N L O W .H d) .C N O L O . ll X y .i N tU d .G ,-i b) O O H m L -.i '6 U ~ v u A o U G ° C. . N H W O w o 5 u G d L N U 3 v o w .C .C w N f4 O w d d) d) O 7 L ll 3 d a Oa d O U ?4 •tJ E H a i w H _ 3 N .1 N rn e~ t~ ~ ~ m m NI b m O ni o 0 o i a ~ > ~ u m o d u b) A yt ro 'cl ° w w n w u q G H ro H w ro no w 8 rd s: G -H H w m O iJ "a G A O 41 w u w ro 3 o u m G w H (d w L O L N o u 10 H o 3 m w is W O rtf J 10 "1 •o d a G n to G .i .G O al > .u C 14 H .G W G JJ rn G 4 H .r~ JJ G O O w L C O (d ~:l •0 •.i G Ij U ) p z u U u rd d t o x W 0 0 >1 0 w m a O L L a 4J w a H U 'o H r4 d a rt ro w 3 1 1 a o w > i o w 3 W i o w m G o w p o m 0 f." H w `d w 3 a w O S-1 m Ol U w !-7 > N ro a A w rt u w >r w bt N F, b 3 o (d H ~j u to o F G v G o w m r L m w O [!1 u O O u r .i w N d 1J > > w a w w h o -0 14 G 1 S4 H G X U H a C w U JJ w w w 2 G 3 w H 0 td o H o u u o o l i X, x m o > r Id 41 G to m 41 ( L r a) N w ( d 4 `o v N O H AJ 'd H Si ro JJ X N " H O W •,A w •,4 -H m -ri H r• G .G U O N N -11 'd m m ro x S4 G o N U bl rd a w S4 C~ u o 3 u w 01 x o rd u JJ a H A a s i ro w O a a v C'. 3 m ll w A ro u R3 w R9 ri w w w O u m w .C Cy G - .G .G H 3 1i 1•i JJ N AJ W .C m w .LJ O w 6 U O L1 L aJ C d > 0) H u (d S4 G $ td N W w w 'd ro w A 'A O w e3 w N G O S4 H aJ 4 " ,d 4i :3 w w .0 JJ M 2 10 > a 44 0 (D 0 no >1 r: 1-1 ,C W w (d H O a H w U S4 W `d H If G no O • 4 }r 'i •14 ,C (d S4 -4 14 O O 7 G .C O H to A ttf A 'd w r A w w w w 90 1J O w aJ -.i G •ri m 0 0 -4 d) O A U t N 4 0) 1-4 U .G u O N •n b $ N b) , JJ N G b1 U C U $ li N o T4 0 0 w 'q o C w R{ ° a o }4 r~ w w •r♦ 4.1 S4 •d w m u •rl 3 U rd u a w w .,.i a w O q L O 7 O w (d U U A W rti A w w 7i w M Zd N .c, X W L w C H G .C. w ,G $ ll to JJ w .C S4 w A •14 m m + m 3 N u G r, w w u w A 'd y ro w 41 o G tD -,q ~ .i u 3 .C w C p m ~ ~ 1J lT O G H m w 4 Id >J N r-1 L U td td 10 (d N m (d • ri H U 27 H li 7 H G O pp m A m .U 10 w w C O u RS L Id Ed O w rt u H $ ro H 3 [ b A w u U U O C Cd N L U L w > 1 >1 a tT w •ri to 'O O .i JJ ,i~ w w rd -mot ~ N A C rd 'd U J-+ r~ m .G w A N w tt1 A N -r i G O i 'd w L G U •ri N U 41 0 5 H H w •n S4 (d 41 1.J C a) a 'd L 41 JJ w O 7 > w O ro rH U m w C •d G H W m o JJ 1d o 1d .4 ii w r-i w O y .O O w -H w w ,C N 4 ro 4 .s=,• SJ a rd A A 'n J-1 yi W JJ G u u 43 m r-I N t1 d !n b t` m m O .-i H N N H M W H U1 N b N t` r-i m H O, N O N e-1 N N N w }4 co w O 'd H N M N N ~ H o H IR H w 0d U N C z C) z~Hy J-1 W ~ a n m O z H C7 H H 0 ji H >a 0 a w L w O N w 3 o G O to •rl -H N iJ L i[$ U O w W W ro L m J~j W m H G V-4 W 44 O M 0 •.i ro a -q sN N N N d m ro n. 0 u H N b •.i .U H d~ 4-1 w w 3 W o q i ro C q O ,d w >4 ro ~tl u G w o G o H o G a rt m H , G u i O u rt{ u o m .H u 3 H A N ~ W ..1 J w `O U L O w j, N J.1 w O bt H z Q ) w > u 41 S4 w d J 0 A -U rn 1 > ro m w U i A > m u G G ' al 0 G .H H .G [ I G b) 1-1 A w (d 'd , ro u RS •.i m ~ O G JJ Fy JJ m - G a w p~` G w p w a r-4 U) O S4 w -14 C H m r. tff w 14 41 > .0 w •H 9s o a " g m w n. A O 23 a u b ro ' ° u + o rt 11 td 4.1 -rl b -i w Si 'd to > 27 d ••i of w v H m >4 q N m w A m td to r a w u JJ 9 rd m N C C ,G . H w H w , H rt to •'i u w G 3 . •+-1 01 . W o • L •rl ll $ 4 y }i 14 G O •0 •n RS N O U w M -ri 1J O - (d - w H 'd H H ro G -4 •C N N 13 g m 3 G H m > 14 w ro 7. U) o a) m "t •rf a bt H JJ U ro w .C ri H H L w -H O O .X Z o ro m ° G -,1 r i a m 3 u ° G td ro A 3 A lo E q O L w w !4 li N w U 23 G (d ro w .C H to 11 ,q o A U N to H w w A z3 w o m .1~ li Ell C u ta "y N 0 a 1d H A O li JJ a) L U A"1 , HH w w 1 ~ H w d 3 } }i 3 W O w 3-i r m 0 q H U A w G w E N N ld Fi l1 G 0 u f4 16 S O U C •H O a A w br N u !4 yi m iJ O a) ''t! m w G b7 li G w w w O G N O -4 m m S4 0 m w x G 4J w U N t4 w 3 G A + 11 3 i u u w u :ps 3 -H q u N H O G X 1J w N (a H U O O J-1 >1 tP JJ H u of w O S4 C - •'i N .i A a G w A 97 ro JJ a w C )4 u -H 0 III U li w m O 11 Q, 0 ~ ~j{ 1 .7 G N 1J W O L (d > 4 7 A 4 N w a R U (a w o w G -r, x w H -H O u •ri w ! 10 JJ Si w H d N g w ro O G r0 C O L -A f4 N L i w H H m (d S.• a U) m N m S4 O L a •ri G O O Sa z U U JJ U H rd a j (d to H H • y' b) ,cl JJ w m ri L 0 IF) Zf •.i w W m b w N w u u td G m m 10 O z w G w w u 3 A Z31 o w JJ o 0 1 0 7 w N to A w ,r~ (d o •a lJ H 0 ~l -i w • , to rd ~l (d w b 1 •rt li •r{ W 0 O A Si iJ ' U s m to b .,i O A H N 0) G 0 N fi w m •rt $ L A -1 w G 0 w .C N H rd H d H a) A H >a C •ri H N o u s:: 3 u 7 u 0 E+ 3 u -.i w G 0 3-4 m ti 2 .i ro iJ 0 ro '0 0 0 ro Ll C N 0 S4 0 w a0 w H N `0 .G m H .G G iJ .,a U N U) ro T7 u o a c L L i H w j w F N O O C 16 ro L U IT N L 7 w C N JJ li 0 G w r N O O L Y N v w F~ o o N m a) .i l4 x O „ ro w N .1 :1 G --I G > JJ L w N .fi w L U H w s4 X , U to o c o v (d N b) S4 L > w H O N U N O .G U) H -L' C U C w H w Sa L C w O C W O 1J w N 7 -n li O W N (d f. JJ w (d w L a) .C f, o w O w ro C -.i G O w A •G A 16 A X 10 H L !a U 3 td w 3 L N (d w of L U 3 N N H ,..i U m J-1 N JOJ W 3 i C 3 4 0 C O (ud ,-4 U a) n C 'O m 4 0 b C H N 4 C m W g m E m u .07 `.QJ U) E qq 0 A o -ri 1J U a3 aC (d 41 O d H O u W .r-{ b, C m m N 4 o O O -.i L N ro G rt g .C L ro N w 11 'O O 3 O .L. Q) 5 O m 0 O 4i U A •0i O .U W b, C •mi N .i x U J-, m ill U to C •r) >y m m JJ O C 4 H u O m r4 O H to to N x U ro a) 10 •ri N ro O, O 4 b1 al G JJ m m W J r-i A b1 pp JJ mC 3 A y •ri 3 a) C •,1 H C •rl m N -ri m r •r+ ro W u b w 4 H :J x m (D 4 ;j A) U 1 Id 4 u m U a) .-1 C A 41 a) 4 C U N W a) 4 U m 3- H 0 w U -.i w H ro 0) U N a) v > U fd b) 0) z m ri C JJ u c U -ri 3 ro w U m 0 u 4 m 5 3 C o }mi m H U 0 n n• ro 4 $ 0 w m > O , H U ~ to •.i N m C -ri 'ro C O a N a) 4 0) U 0) a ry' .`QJ U) H >1 .i X C ri .L" U H C O •ri JJ m a) y O' 4 C 0 0 L r-i JJ U m 4 •ri b IJ O C ° ri m > O 4 a a m o w m C O ..-i U r+ 'O - C O u L u w Id 4 u O U U r-i C U • 4 44 A 3 bl r - 4 U L N 0 a) W 3 7 O >r iJ td ,C 3 3 aI a O a) )i a) .i..-" 3 (1) U (d r-i a w r: o 4 4i > C O .14 JJ m 0) JJ Q) 41 ro O o U m }-1 a) rd C O H m r.C C bJ -,-i m a) aoi w C b •rI m N ro a) 4 U u a w •'I ty7 m r•-i •4 11 (d w 4 O w b 1:'. X m m a) H a m U N 4j a 4 U 4 m L -ri S u C u m a N i J4 m JJ -H w o m a) u G ri Id 6 N .-1 U N C •a 1-f O {J m > 4 a) m C O U a) 4 o O ,i 4 L a) O m 10 - N J., G' m ~r. a ~ u -H w •rl ~ •ri m 4 (d r-i ::1 U -4 IJ a+ (d a C -ri b1 q ri O -1 •ri C A .Ci ~ O m ) 4J L C ill 4 0) w w •ri 'o 4 a) > m IJ 0 O A rt i + m U a) 4 O :3 7+ N H m ro a O O ~ y •H X C H u H C O a) o w a) A 0) > m x :3 O U gym.. A - -C CA C o U H m > O a a m C M1n11 O J 11 IN O1 , a1 41 r-i 7 U W 44 N 4 ;3 O > X C -t .G aJ H r-1 ai ,S o )-I a O, (d 114 O uJ z o IJ -ri b q 0 U .C of O O 41 > -4 U m m v z N .i Jj.1 n 4 (V O b~ a) E 0 4 fir. ro 1 .14 ~ A U o a) 4JJ .C JJ ro o C ro )Pi U r0 -I ri H a) )-i a) 3 L m G 4 to L 0 % O 4 '0 x O) > •a IJ (d is z a) L C O •,.J li m r-i U Q m $ JJ z 0) aa)i W w w ri 'd m A ro H C 3 rtt O J.1 b g U M ro W U) -r.i > P 0) 40-3 y, a) C 11 N O .Q OE) b1 C ri 'O H •ri A 0) 43 >t (.y) 4 41 w 4 U) 10 0) JJ C m 3 >t 0) J J m C .14 ro U :J 'O }~1 ~ Z iJ cc to •.i m b ri rd 4 4 JJ N 0 L 44 (a U .-i N M •P Vl b m ~ O r-1 r-i ri N rl M N dr N Ul N ,O r-J ~ N fD N O, N O N +i N N N M N ~ N a) a) a) JJ > EC 13 m A a) 0) O U 4 - (d O .a O ro a) > ~d > ro •,i 4 O w a) 01 ro O JJ 4 44 an :1 U ro it u 1~1 0 rd 0 1J A 1-4 z O u W o m m o m JJ 4 0 m 4J A 3 L U w ro a OJ to -ri O ai F v O v x to .U q N m 14 m h X m ,A m •r4 4 sJ m a) w O m + z 4 U m m W ,J gd U 3 r, Q) m Q) '0 3 Q o m '0 ri a mi A 4i 0 N 1-4 u r ii X roq m 44.J H 0 q u m U 6 4J O O o -r-) CO UI li . N J.J C a) r-) O JJ -H a) 0 -ri w •ri U J-J m q i rn. > w o > U m > 3 10 > 3 u m m i q m r o -ri -ri 1-) (d 4 N m r) U ,C E •C X -.i F O m .u m 4) U U 113 C vJ 0) m > U x .u bt a) 1J C r-t U m m - H m m 4 O .G > O •ri m H C H •ri a) H U .C •H OJ U U ,C a m •H N JJ 0 w O ,.C. O A U (D i-.' bt a) (a O 11 ES m - a) O 4 ,1 JJ J-) >.J A o :j aJ w w w •r♦ z ,C 3 •14 m R g o Itl m JJ 4 0 -H 1-1 O U C O •ri O X r0 04 A 7 > u m L O w i m U W td H _ O C .C 'O m -ri N v •O m ::j C a) -i m u -ri a) 4.) A m m o m ru - O r-i a) A O U -ri w > U •,1 J: U C A U r., W W C m m m L L C U O O H O JJ 1J -r1 N ri N U U W m O _ U O N 0 O) U -ri a •i to v m m A w 4 u - m 10 m x o ro o a) O C H Ji > J-J •ri U -ri m ro 11 U -ri JJ L ro O N U Q) rt H •r( L g O V) q iJ rn a) u _ s U '1 U o a) ~ 3 m r O 4 ~ U a - 10 W ~ (a U U -,i O 0 W ro U to N v oq m Q rt z cx H O AJJ o 3 rH 'i 0 > U 3 r o m d A O JJ 4 0 a m 0 o m o ro 3 . ro ,i aT JJ W iJ w *O 3 A o to 1, Pi •,1 -ri u ri 0 r-1 u C W m g. 4 v > + cn W N u m w 10 m rn m m ~a m u v °i i ro ro v Q) ,J X m U N W E W m O O li m •r( A A E m 'O U -ri J~ ri .i H H O O C w C - 'O JJ ;J m O C Q rtf tm ,0 m W ul U -H -ri JJ H H u rtf m H m o u zz Ha z i m 0) o ro • o w ro c 4 a d x t, 0 o a L a i FG 0 aJ m w n 7 li u U Q U Q C N C E W A m C T~ y O _4 J o C o to r-i Q) 0 Ci .,1 w 0 .rl 3 N -fl X -H O 'O b r-i -ri C m .o 0 'O JJ m J, 1J > H 3 Jl -r1 H H r1 H N 01 L H m 01 fo 0) a m m m -rt C 01 'CS h C m u 0) > v m 3 4 m a o C 4 4 0 . z 4 V) Q) t7) ro -H A U C m 4 r6 (a L al 7 C L H O 3 m H .-i N -rl m v m 0) m A N m U a7 Q N w •ri u •O -ri Ei (D 0) O •G O O ri C 0) N O J: O 4 L H H L L q U U 7, O w U A Q -ra U u W .s n n ~ ~n e r m m o ~n r o N Ln N H CIO O o *Cf o r-t N 3 m N N H ~ o H ri) H a) 0 U N zu H 1 u~ w u~i Hz C7 .-a i 0 °a~ O~ ai Si o'0 CD r-i N m N N 0O 2 H to U3 H a) 0 U N Z U H JJ w oz C9 r-i 0 o~ H r U) O O u O • to N a) U 7 A )t 4 R$ r-1 to H w U) H 44 C N (n a) X N w O 4 w N ~l o >t to O a) C 0 O . a w N H O L >t ro 3 O H a a v a) U 0 U N w O O 1 o N tm 41 ~i •H y o Qi H N L 'H H i) o bi L' h to w 4 u u C A N N C O w d w N N H N u a) 11 - to 3 x C rtf [ ; u O . -H w U) w •H .C C .u to O H N to a) H iJ O w C O )J U O )-i to C •H Li u C 0) • 4 o 0 U H H to 41 N r4 H w H N .q F~ f3 .u C o w tT C 'C1 N 3 .u 0, a p x 4) 3 u to L to to u 1d .C u w f! o U to N A Id H :j o to .C 3 N •d •.i to 4 u •.i U U ,q u •G 11 -4 3 U .C L .H 3 0 0 w •H H Id H U w •H C O 2 td H C 0 U A 0 :j o -1 A.i by to N N N k Pt 0 C. w N )d a) 4 41 r 0 •H .u U ro m Hi > 0 • w H N C 0 •H w U) H ~ H d o 3 H w 0 C •H 'O H •H C A v ro .u N J~ N 3 y H 'd H -H C A w O .C u w O a) N H Li to 14 3 N - li at w a .C m -r1 r N 3 v -H to (A N 3 Id q U N to O .U a) .~C -H a w b) C H 'd H -.a y 0 w 'O 'd N H ~ C 0 •H w w •,a O 0) o y Ul C •H u uu N- ti w 'd H ::j o Ts O to w a) a . td $ m 4 N r4 d O -H H 4 U U -H 4j 4! •H 4J U H o U x U H to •H N H H to a) r-1 a U) m 4 y N N td .-i A O a) ,C O U >t )t 41 U H s., H li " N rt •H U U li N C 4 }t -H u H C d) W N a w a) a w m q O L m V t) w O a u H ~Z: W x U H z I.:j O 1-1 U o U JJ a) H N y 9 0 C N w u ro A to W x to 3 w ::j O -H •H >t O a td x H U > N C u O w O 'd r-4 Id P'. W P: w U -H .U 0 1) W H q~• fy. W rC q w H •H O .U Ck _4 w O W z O U) W W z a) .C L W x 0 r H 0 a) 44 H b ~ H H N A t) U) ww N a1 w W z cn r4 W N N 0 O ).i A U x to O U 0 6 m Q H HH m C O N ,C H 1) 't r~ 44 W ~ O -H . O a) w 0 O rC E a) 1 3 O u H N rj) H -H 0 to H W H a `O r m a) P: to H 04 q N • o w A ai •H G 4j q o U o U ~ w C L td x v H u w u > w H O H N v .0 C H .C u : O o .u a) > ro o U •H a) 41 x •n U 3 m H 4 U L U r o C 14 a) o a to w :1 w 0 U) 'd ai al C •d O o N 3 a) C ro 44 H to m > O u U w 3 x -4 o .C 0 w d u Jam) t )O N G H m -1 'd > A o q a) u x L E) U a rd w U a) -H ro w w rroc C y H N U 0 41 a td ro g 0 U o w a) w to w x o 0 to ,-1 td H nt u O to b .u A E w 3 H r1 N rn w N m r m m o ri .t H N H M M w H to H e H r H m H rn H o N H N N N ~ N w N to N H O 0 41 1J H N O i a) d H to A b) w -rt > W to > u o fr J) w O 14 0 w p H a) C 0) 4 N u x o to N 44 .H to x 4 .C p i i L) i IO 31 (L) k a) > H N ~0) ~11 41 u l i iCl O N w 2 uq 3 a D Ci) m 4 w L w ro >1 m m o U as 0 o H (n ro q 4 3 1-1 1) l b )t 3 O 1N b) O O b) O 4) a) L'. td ~ m > W 3 Ot 0 W )i a) •H - O .u N q C O T) O a H W U 'Z.. u 01 U to O •H rti L ,-t 1-1 to 'a •d ro C .C •H aJ # -H q w O i) H t-+ w 1-1 44 a) ~1 •H .U ,L.' •H 44 w w 3-I O O (1 O L •H O H O x-. to u C 1-) O •H -H w N M 3 > 44 O 7 3 r-i w 0 '0 • 1 w Q C A a) )4 U 0 H a) to >Y )4 _U 11 a) 1) .-t ro k C a) O v b) a) o U) t✓., -H .-1 C w N ro 44 o o li Q to 3 0 :j o w 0 4 ~ 3 ~t w u o w 0" -H (a H ro . H L g O u O A U) O a) m 10 0 w b) to u w d A u fL U a c 0 O H A U C N > C -H a) O U w C to O h U to C u •H U -H U W to b H -H O 4t U q w w w to v 11 O >i O to a b •H (a v rd a) o > rd a) ro q to •d w o u ,C x G A o 3 a fro • 4 q to w .u w u st CO w u y a o w w t~ to .C a u N •H 'cl H H a N N N 0 o z- C rn a r > lT u 44 O N W (a a N )t •H U H -H a) H zWz N to 10J bt to H U w 0 z N 3 m w a N 0 a. 2 a) td .Ct H N 0 G •H O 0 ,C w .C u H t.. w E O H U O 0 U) q L i) N i-i G' N O to ~ C q a C r-1 u N - ~j td It 44 ti O PP77 - d 1) -H .u •H O 7-1 w 14 to w w •H W O C O C w to 0 C o o a) o w u 0 ro w to i, 0 0 3 N ? o C .01 .H w o w w w H C to a v G -1 aa) m w A ro JJ w W C U z r, )-1 0 w ro C L O •n W z ro -t o rd C O t~ N a N O O N N 4 w L Q O o H A t A H 27 rj > H K •H ,C U) H k N C ro H H 0 0 •H O x 'O F N L u! N O N .C •H N H Cl) .-t O > H 10 li ro f.' U) to o n N a D H '0 H U) u to l a 1J to to N W L -H H )t H b N N ,-t O a H N N to y 4 U) H O O to N to U N H w 3 O H q to y ,s.^ O y > x aCj Or w U L U C O N N 'd N F: •H L U O o N u > U u a) G H o q w H > u U > u N b ,p ?4 to to j q _ -H , O N 0 0 •H •H L L 3 ttl N u v N Oi H o w 'U li 3 a N 3 o v N o tT r, a) 3 > c li - H E to 0 _ a b, R C i~ 3 0 -H H O li al !a U) w to 10 a) ~ m rt C o _H li N 'd H u N ro -H to x L C 3 to .-t 7 N H a) C U) C to 7 u L U) H to to L b) •H N 'O U )i y - N It a •n w 10 rti F) N N w N c 1,' N t.) N N d L ,c •Lt to u 3 m H Z O N A u N H q 3 A L .H u L .H to H `C) )-i ~ N n ~ in .a r m m o N vi r o N H .t r1 N .-1 N H H N N N N N Ln N H to N 0 T) o ,-1 N 3 M N N ~ H rt z H H U) H a) U N zu H (d L a oz Ln m o~ L H H to (D `•i to a) o z) CD 11 N S rn N N H .-t o H U) U) H N 00 U 7 z U `L td 1) Pi U) F z W H O 4 41 U 3 C o o m G 5 W u li W o ° ° -1 44 O O " Z b O N " N G . N a) 3 .4 C i O w 3 ° ro rl E O q 41 N 4 ro .S -4 4 ~-r 'U 1 J a) S .Li U r4 L U -.H 1) ~ U FC o A x sz: 9 y ~ ro ~4 ~ Q) 5 0 ° N W li v i s4 C U r1 b H a O N N O W y G li R (1) 1 U [ ~ a) v o c. d N a N y ~ 3 L ~ C W W u 'd q C C u j c d .C o ; 3 o A m •a i . u 3 o v m 41 C C ~ U to N H U) U) (d C U H O y a) ~4 R 3 .C A H 3 a o to .H G u o ' ~ tT N O u C O 14 'A • . G W 44 W 4 W O to ~ U 0 ° ?r -1 F1 N W rn z b O ~u • ro 41 10 0) :j 0) 0 3 M L -4 o 07 r4 to -4 H ~ U N ro o p q `A q N q rd C U C R C 1 .-i C ~4 W ~O W N y N .ri U) . rti W Q4 W N o rt T J W G W ri rd x H N ° G qq d O °i q q a N C O F i N C N V ✓ 0 r -r W N N r$ U O) O 1 7 •r 1 O L A N 0 C4 44 N U ~ E-4 fd r N Q U 1) L ro O W O O U N U C O C H . . 3 O 3 .i ' L (n N U O W O U w W ra d .,1 O O Ca G b H ll r. b O U H H O H U t C rd 5 a d W rx r-i W H J X F W ( O -4 ro ri b C O 4 N 0 U 43 H L Id N in C4 O w u O [ a O w C O C ri O r4 O A O 3 -H O 44 N ~ .H C d O 3 W U N N ro W z m w W z m w w z m w O L O , W .U N to N x p w ril ~ W O 4 H N -H O W C W L W W 41 u W H cn H to ul H , .u C d o W A a o z ~ 0 E m E m E C -H W 44 En 41 v 11 -4 10 U 1 4r ,w 4-7 H PG H p: H 94 -H O G 3 -H O U m H 44 O O -,1 ll -ri ~ ~ ~ 1fl i E4 W 0 0 dd H ou - g i ^ 0 ~ 44 -4 N 0 r v L m b U W ~1 ri m U k A m A o W o a- i 1-4 -4 ~a ) 0 3 C O x ro H u U M a A l4 u C W C a) C W C d) o 0 m 0 0 -.i 0 - 4 H W .C 11 O o 41 N a) ,q 4-) a .2 N ri a~ N } to 13 X U U !j 1 ~ ~ 1 ' N o ~ ro S4 m rd - o - 0 3 id W 41 - L u -ri 1J N W ro a) ? L a 'O 3 0 ~ y o o y ?1 N r rd L 41 O Id L N 4-4 • 4 41 L H ~ -Izm Ln e-r N r^ sM ut b t~ m o~ O .-i N r7 ~T Ul ,o ~ m N.. 0._... .-i N nt V~ Vl N .-1 N H H 'i .i .i H N N N N N N C W 1>i~ 2r 14 W N S; H - )4 ri 1) H O to 4) O p C .u 4 N N .m U o C ll ro ro 41 - -rNi a) m aa)i o' aWi q N 3 o w o -H p, 3 H Na o ro W n G H 4J Q) 3 I u m o ro r1 u ❑ o o W a `i C m o o roy O w o o 3 L R a) m dd o rd ~ mw w o w O y " 8 b 44 1 r .,1 11 14 W 3 a x 4a d 3 r° 0 W J rr ro a H G 3 o to rtl O O U N y 4 >J W W C7 rd 4 Jam,) -.i O rdC a HT.)O W10044 .W W W 0 ?i .C'.. 4.1 U) 41 4 N 44 `D O Ry rA JJ a4ri J3 7 N W O L H H Ur 9rOO44r.(D Wm • p U) a) 41 A O rd u o ° ~ a L r1 e „ 4 g~ W .C to U rd E' C N u y N N rd a) .u D H rr •O A 3 -H w P, •U , 0 b) 'C U C W --t 0, 41 ° qq a 7 i O 0 h O d y d q 0 p ?r N H o oa •C1 N ° .C R u~ -.N1 4 v u N Ct R 3 rn m C W 4 A b W U o Oa m G N C O i W W O .i qC r1 O E N N N U li U W N 'O b ~ U ~ '4" rtl i' W U N rd SS - f U 7 4 N .U CL -.i N ro 0 Ul .4 1J W 44 .yi cY. .Yi °r - N -N.i - 11 i 44 'o oO 0_ 0 O O C U "1 p, o o mar 'G) w m ° W A Q) N W b W d C O C r H L H N rtt 2 W W z «1 O O L 7 y rtf in H O W i.r rd 4 _ ,Q aa 5 A X li W U C 44 w o 44 A N HH a N HH ~.ro MG) r7 O O O ' S4 , U) E •4 (n u t7 U a u rd 7 O W U) V) H N U •ri rd mu `J C 4 N ro N 4 W W ro 1J H Ri C H O N 4 4 TT A b 4 ro O W W'7. O rd )-1 N .U tJ 4 (n 'n a O, O C 'C' X rd W ,C -.i li U O 4 N Si 3 y U O W 0 W a U u N U m rd _ 1 b x 0 4 a) 3 7 4 U L a y y a :J a w m 5 m m ro 10 -WC H br W W C 3 H 3 !O-r u U C 4 4i m ,C Q) V) O H L O L ll U U rd W w H r. .C G W N Z) N 'O b C q -.1 I4 li O -H W N bt '3 -.-t 7 4 W U a7 0 C O N C O' W y W W U rtS O -1 O -ri W •.-i ro N CL 5 ;3 04 :3 3 CW7 w O 0 3 E ro o U o dN G a H to 5 a mar o~ o -H N N ~ H 09 w rd v7 L) N zu H a N m O z H .-i O a~ H ro >1 x L w n x H H W 1 x x a a N O w •rl 4' U b H w •ri N w p, T1 O O 41 <d -4 ro rn ro ~ ~ ~ ~ ro r4 w .c ji ai u (0 .G H A C U w rl w as ri td N w w .r U H -rt A w ~j 0 'd w 'tl A -A H ~w N T) w N :i O C r•1 1-1 O.A{ 'U N O 0 -Y N w ~ N 1 l 'C) N U N L W A '[u r 'C7 .O >J O 0 d to o d C 'O -H I r: 1 td .,a N w 1( X 'tl w w ri U 3 0 O -,A w it 3 N C H w o m o ~3 .rA C w w 0 3 •rt w r A O w .C aJ >1 w A .u A w u w ro v o u ,1 3 b U of ro -r1 A Q) F. o -.1 U C H >v w U) C O $ w q w w w w o b H a) G as w O S-i H •ri N N U H A .ri O O H H O w 10 r1 11 tr w .O •r1 •n p, X 3 A w w •ri w H w b id rd H m 7 3 m 0 w w w ci w X 3 U H O •ri w H •rl O w G Sa •14 ~i H w d) EC C H •ri r. O 3 w w w w •ri H td W (d 3 ol O x w O 44 H U L C w A 1) w a r; w w R} ri H w O H w 1.1 -rt w U w to A to u y X 5 H > w a > w a ti q y w d 5 w x w m x w r4 N x 3 u o z -4 3 0 z N O ~4 Z a~ U O 21 A U W N •ri 22 w z w yt w ,L, L w U O r1 Co aJ o of H o it x u w w 5 u q d o x H q m w la rd w ro r w o > a w w M w p x, o W 0) u ;j •14 m W q w q C4 O C c4 0 0 3 r+ .u c~ w 'n w aj c~ U) o Ej u w 00-1i H O X O w bl G' .r) O H U O W., a w 3 to ,d 7, 6, a u U, w a w 1-1 a W w H t4 44 ti z O W m z O b n3 A z W z X to z C rCi (d z X O O O aa 1 O •r1 to L O Q O .C C L ll •ri O •r1 .C U H H '>i 4 $ H M R) 4' H r.C H to N •r1 'd H H a~ O to cp H O U) U) H i W H En C w (d A 'd H t~ w w r-i UM H :j 10 m o w u la y w to 3. i A H H w r4 H O 0 U cnH tY HH ,C :j (d w t1: HH" z A 44 ri ~Hi, .0 O 3 U H N H N L .C L O O AU H 5. 'd L d O U U i3 3 u u •01 to L) ~ v ~ o , q ~ dd ~ u ~1 o w G w ~~d" -u •rCi C 'd •,i O 1tl R W ~ r N a-i .%4' u N H -4 li O14 c7 O ro4' U O 'O b S w-i N M W " p1 1Ntl 14- ro w 3 a H w a 41 11 t-, 1 w w X -ri I-, N A 0r w p, n L u V 9 N C A --1 Au ra N M w 1n ,o r m rn o H N r~ a ,n 1n r m m o ..i N m w .n H .-1 N H r-1 H .-1 •-i .-i N N N N N N Q) W o ~ >1 0 W o 11 }4 w pp dJ rt 3 ~ I J N n 'i RS , r 6 y b A N A -1 U •ri .N. •rl N S-1 N a IJ b L 0 14 11 (d w S•'-. L 5 4.. ra ~ ww w a • i k w ,d ~ A 7 H H g m 3 W 0 13 iH w w C a3 11 x w 3 O 4 H N U C-,• C 1) q fd N 3 a} 0 'd 1-1 (D E0 of r L w H ri ?4 H bl • w ri 4-; :j w -1 w i d ro 'd w r C r1 w w A .0 O w 1 v 'd w -rl A w H 3 bl O H .U ,-1 L •ri •H •ri •ri j.' U X O v w ~y -rl a w r-i N O O w a) C U {-t as .q H ri G 1-1 Fi to rd .u •ri U A A q -r+ O O a •r1 11 w C O (a •+i -rl w S, 0 3 u 1! o U 4 :j to 3 X a) w u A fi as aJ as S1 O - tr V) aJ .t; A 27 w r o o rd .u H 'A a.1 b q O •r♦ 4' 41 L H w -rl .U •r1 U bl Fj td w bt H (d w •ri X W W Y) w i.J O m w )-i O 11 H ri r-i ?i JJ H ri w w u O (d W A .C A w z 11 C 7 N to • 1 H w r1 b fl H u y > b, w u u o (d 7 H b T1 iT A •ri w , w 3 a) L i.l ro •ri 3 w w- w w C rl w }4 O w -H 11 al b , w A Id N (U w 0 •H H ri 4 to l) O )-i rC x w N N O H O •ri 11 w O I-) w U ro C. N rd 3 w H O a 51 w 3 w } H w w w w •ri U rl w 0 H -r1 m a a N ji O A to N > w A ro 4 4) A H o to w u w O ro N > O O U •ri UI •ri •ri b) $ A W L H b1 b O +i T) 01 O w w U C H • p, w C w r-I U w 1-1 G la 7 W U ri H •H O o r H o o r1 0 O rd o o w C w 3 w C w 71 w a~ w O ,i," O N W U U H bt lJ p w W W - U ul A 'U O 3 L A rt a la N .ri w Z W 0 o N rd Id •rl A O) w .U 3 27 a w U H H b1 r O Cn ll N w L -H H •ri w N (d w O w O q 4 w O w A W O 3 1 X w H C 'd w C to H w A 3 w O w H w H H w 0 O U) H H 'd rJ 'd W b N w w w . ri A 51 H H a r, u r= O w rn C O a) .C H 3 y 1-i C H •r1 O H r-1 C N w C w u - 'd w F C w ri O w w w -r+ 7 w G 0) 6) -H 0 x w H (d U w w O C C 3 rtf > U U .C m t w H S H i H o w El u rd o li m w ro L a .L. tT ,L-' w • •ri H H O A N G L tJ bl u U :5 Q N O H 0 w H w C C C (d A C w a~ O ) U) H y N N L ,C w -rf ri N b w ,G 0) 3 A w a - al 7 H a L' b b i~ A IT C •rf cd N H H fd L w w L ?y .-4 V H -'i ri H w U U O E rti -r1 N C w a~ C v w u C •O 7, o Q ) a) Y. O G C 7 G O C O O rt w O O 0 G (d O A A w N L O A O u C U U)-- r > a A U (d w ~ rv n w n ~ r m rn o H 1n 1n o .y rv w W w 0 'tt o ri ~ g r1 N N z ~ 0 H ~ w u ~ zu H a a w oz 0 o~ ji H di old o i N -H nr r~ N N ~ r-t O 10 U) U N zv H 4J y a u) H z .-1 m Fit u Ln to w ~i H 0 ~ N w ri ri at m u x JJ 0 w 41 w o w N N ro )i 44 N N L 0 u `O w x w w U3 N to •H 411 O G w N u ,C L tT -0 14 5 o U ro O N H U rd N •'i !d .41 N E ai G w 4 - uq of N G y w )i w L w ° m 1) -.Vi 0 w u a W rd x O U) .4 N )wi uCi U C w N Id N '1 w u to z ro 1-1 a O F w ro a 0 y 4 41 :j D W ~ •H U U H + v C O N U) U W a O Ul aW E a U ri w w m N F o ~'j fi m w H w U U H x W O H N N H O U _ o .3U w U) li 7 o A ro ro m w w } H X mE N u i L N -,i w O 4 U O W w 3 Id w N a) .C w ~i w ° 2f y a (d w 'A o " w } -.i w N a) Al L N w Nm Gi -H O A -o N 3 U W x w •O 1) m a1 w rd a) w N w G -,I A o li -H °tn 7r 1 O a N C1 o w C G •.-i !i G O U 3 4 b) ..G.i N ~ o U N d) N C1 .a w 'A o . H . ro L j (d ,f'-. a i°) G •H w a) )4 rr ro > o N N ~ q O ro H u U w of b) Gi ro A ro a O bl z 0 u 1 11 w b) rd rd U H ai X H li X O 0 ri is f4 to Gi ~ A r H U id C 3 ~ O N W it N 0 h w -4 m o to Gi O b) N L d -f.. b) N row rt) -rte) 3 N N .H C o .H L id G •H v -4 } O .i rtf 41 } Id N L b) G H t N [ o w o o G -ri o to }i A ro O N a N u ro N a `w 4J w 3 .C ,i°.' u ro b) G m ro w N w ° a~ iJ :j o N 0 d i ro i A w O 4) H a o U 41 P. O 41 .,i N N ro G 3 w •H .5 .G u 0 O 41 X U o 1-I A L C d 'h a) .1.1 L v G' (d 4 m CD . o a, w p a) C a~ w (v h w w o m y N w N w E •H G CD a ro .G N 1 •H o w O H )J ro ,G S w J ro .F E 41 ro d ~ O 1) ° C •,i m N m w N w -.t idi C O r) U 11 x 3 o b o „ o A 10 O 0 3 a) '0 v U >1 0 o N C N G H ro i A 0 w a O o u Id w ° 1) a w u U x .U 0 0 O )i b 0 rt m to w N 0 7 o .i N ri a ~n m r m m o H ,-i H N .-i ri H a H in ei m H .-i .•1 .i N N N N w OD W CD Tf N • \ f'1 N N \ H .-i -A o 0 H d) O W U N zu CP C H ro ~ A w a .rtfC ~ .o r~ Si H w Id 1d N n N to U w -4 } H 3 to w 0 r; X J C p, w U U N u o ai w O W En < a H q N4 w frt ~ (n N N N H a Ln Inz C9 0 o , 41- ri .F rl o H N a) N w w L) Fi r 10 44 41 G } ri G r-i i.) -,4 44 ~4 P. 3 A v F X u C rt w ai 3 N Zn U CD U1 w N } O w .C N w a) F 3 G m li H u 14 ro U o Id w _4 x m o •o o R b g 3 0 G U a o li H O O H F qq m o .C N} H a.) U .i x N . u -1 ro & b N Id p C -.i Px w '[7 tJ .-i w 0 H N t) •u ~d N w - H Id H rl ~ ul H •r-1 Q ro .Fi H m~ q ' N l 0 O u 3 w & 1 N w U b N to O A w w O ri •A N ~ ~ ' to wN i~ U G `b G w w w rt) w w Fi °i O b o 3 ll N C 0 X a 4 ° H ~ x 0 Q V; 4j Q)' 01 a) U 4J ~4 3 0 3 Hu u °u m~ a Gi w J 'A a } .-i via) 0 rVu ro ro 0 A i u 41 w swi X 3 i I N w -r I U `a a) H -4 .4 bt P+ 10 - x O X(L) F U Ou w. Id C u A O C aa)) a X r; 10 H y U 1j O > H b b 0 W N 0 ~ N N a 0 ° tL C) ro j r-i u a 0 mN W 1H O O ro C C 04 R r H w O to N N 0 v N 4 w 41 w N N N A b ° 0 b G F. W q ,o w 3 •H •n F -H u d w 'I-, 5 w v F o w b 10 w 2 F } )ro to o w i m r- R i w O O. O w r N F L w in 4) ro ° N w C H } F 3 w •,Fi o o m o u N H L m z) i •,i H cn F ro u ro a w .,Fi " y, H H } O v ° o x ro x ~HH tl C ro ro N w F c a W N X H Tv b ro w A-) J H a m 7 rd I N O .iJ y w w w b ri O ` o -rN'i y O ~ n7, rH-i 0 41 o w N w w R iy A O U U } O w w -n N N id E. H N o ti OG N y w m i o ro N w A H 3 m o w li „ a ro z) N N o N C A a y w - o F N ,-°i .Hi ro -H Q) A b li 1 O 0 O U) w N E x N 3 R w > C P+ N b Un w U) O w u O n 7 N n. b 0 } O O O C C O G w a 1~ -.-t N w Id N R) f(l a w a E rt Fi a b Id H y w v o a) C A a N n n n n ~ r m m o v ~n r N N v a `D o o ro O .-i N 3 m N N H H o V) H w ~a U N 2 U H J w U) z 0 ri m O a ~ H H N }4 w o N H q) Id - W Id N >r a) A 3 ro F, N ra Q) ~ N a U G a o a to •H q j 4-j 4 j Td 1 a) N 'U 3 ° ° 3 v a W , 4 C ! ! o N 41 n G v 4 ~ O d U O O A O m u) ~ (L) >r C x m 3 O -H C X M > to O 44 4 d •H ' H > ro •H a) a) •n !J -H N G •H G a) -H O W rd N W ,4 N O ~d O t~ H to -.i ~A X ° G 'J X 3 0 m ! N~ b rd o N (1) ! 1 u 3 01 m m ° rd ~ Q) a) U N L m 0 O N ~ •7 o ff r d -H O 'd 3 to A • i N 4 0 1 j - 10 z ca 41 S 4 U ro 13 G O 1J . ro N n 1d a) a) A N Q) O m N L N -•-1 ~7 4d r, a) N a) N tl .G 0 N F-• tI N N Clq ro 6) td }-1 O 'o G' w N b1 •.i f"-. S' L .G G H N 3 .H m 4 G ld IoH ro r 4 w U o ° w H H ro ro w o rd d U •H N b A >r •H 41 ji > 44 rd as „ U) ro v (1) " d) v -4 41 b) w z 10 0 H 3 o m c Vd ro 11 U) m o m 2) •H fn U) ro ri r0 R) N •H U . ll 1J a) N U > G N to H ro C - H Itl O U N 1-1 N N C r G G U) C: b O) ld O A N N W N li H O (L) O N . J-) H (1) sa to b1 u o m 0 a~ > v u > 23 ai o a o C: ~4 ::1 -14 4 u 'j S 1°J a 4 H i Id k )a 1J a) -H O m }U}..~~ P ro 1 H W 0 W H ro a) G N U N :j S N 4 N G O O O H rd ra a O N O N L N n C7 >a U U . 11 • H C1 - !J a rd N N O L rd L W 1-1 rd O Q 4 U RS a) ro .H •O -H O )1 H N H O G U O - O (d fWib 1 r1 U G rd m ro " W I - N U) . L a ro d G O N U rG p: rd H O w a) q O -H U a ) 4 L tT G 4 }J Pi O d G' ' ro N O G O U W G O D a! ~t N Id (z ] U N ) N a O L H 'd a) 0.i w w tI) h x N a w -H U G O u .G JJ w m w n 7~ W W •H W ' H O W (d N U S4 N O G, - -r O a) W .~G G LI) Fi f ~ (d 3 ' a m O h 6 ~ W fo ~ -4 ~ N U .,1 j o .d c i) d r -1 N N fd •H H H .H W to 13 G aY H -H od 1.) H ro •n R7 w o 0 ~ 14 N o t o g r ~ • i { o ~ bi O u (1) (1) >t H ro N li C) . UUU r a z H 3 Q i l O" U ,4 G U z ,4 a U 'd N tR L )4 O O •.-f •H -H H iJ x a d S-i b N .4 1 G 0 V .H H O G O H 3 d > m r m u N a X N !ui A N o a A W H . qq, 4 0) m G [ m 'd 0 w rd O H a ::s X a) u 4 1 a ~ G z >4 A G .4 2J L 1-) ) 1, N . tJ (1) N 1) H L ro U) to N rd r4 V) 14 U Id O 1.1 d rd a) O .4 y •H $ O JJ qq W .C • -4 N O 4 N 4 R3 y1~~ 1 rt O U rt, n H H )d H 1J q 11 rd .i N M W ril ~ r ~ m O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N ~ ~ . { N N N N N N N 41 U m 3 w 3 v 0 H m > G o 0 0 w to N H L O A b) 41 U a) 0 W rd z G .4 jj •H 0) •H x o •,1 > .G 3 S4 H .H L b z >t G 1J .U 4) O 11 N 11 a N L ? O N 'O G d A A X 7 0 ~ G ~ m 14 t 11 ro • N 4 d to . i 14 >r >1 W R X A N L rd " 0 1 G N R A b ~ o o S- ro a G - m ro or m .1 . 4.) •1 4 0 1) 41 11 X ;j 0 g u >t a) a) N F. •H 0 N X H G G co d) N N a -4 IJ to U .H p O O O 4 1J o 0 r1 ro r0 1J )-1 G 0 .U 4 ro 0 ?4 •O 0 -H U -H O r-1 a U a) d G d W N N r-i d o 11 m 4 W M 9 '1 N N U) d C) 14 O O H .G L •H r4.. ( N a) A t > ri X S4 U) O O .C L M > (1) W A 0 N N )1 N -H 'U 1y •H rd N M U ri U -4 ro id 0 3 -H )4 G 3 L N b) W N •H N rd v Q) of N a Q) N a m 3 o -H (d ~ H ro N .4"' }a a o > ,4 N H 4 a) G G 0 _ !s L 4 4 W N L (1) (n a) Id aJ a) v fl O O U U .H 0 o rd x a 4 a rd o . (D x (d u v G r ,d z b '77 a) G V tT x .-i ,4 U N > u •H N ,4 U ro O 13 u -H G to N G Q) +1 to o rd ,J a) a •H U) 'U m 0 G -H G (D -H .4 G A to al N A O O r-1 H )-1 G 'O •H x •H > ,4 J. U •H 11 W a v •H •H N 3.1 N O L >y v cc ro rd b) iJ ro v r -H O a - H (D w N ro ~ 5 'A -H a) r-1 4 4 W ~y .4 !d 4 a S ro a) q g rd ~ a A o H rra 3 H ~ '1'1 G m u u rd p ~ H w a O O N w a U N a) N a) 0 4 A 11 O M $ N N C 4 , i as U 4 •H U N F a) > .4 N q ?4 ~J ro a) u -H to fa . H •H a) L N O (ft U a) 1-n N X C a) ,4 U 2 U a) U Q) x a •H N N .4 a) Q) G H .4 ~ U ro A 1J ~ ) .H U) 1.1 >1 A `O H 'O 1J U •H a) H yl N J .1 d) >r E U U .H a) N H 4 AJ H W 3 a ° Id 1 ro q w N N w C a3 41 W H , U 1 . i O 4 N N 3 r>~ ° ) J 1 m N a) M rn k . L 4 -H ro • i to ro - - i H Q CB w N x )i 19 Cd u a) 1J U) a) 4 p N 3 +J tT v ) f4 G a) 12i U) W N .C U r U o !J ro .u > ro 3 x q a w ,4 N v ~y o G ro H w o ro a A v N m W •H 4 a) A N N -H a) x ro 4 L C Q) H H •H i 3 O H O N m ,4 .U fa H 7-+ H N H C7 3 u 3 0 u u u > ! v G 4 L N } ro N , H fL' b H C H A N Cd7 N W O to ~j .4 N 4 O a U a) > 4 O >r 4 H O !J U J"-. (1) a 3 a) 'O H H i r- H O N L H F~ H a) C l O H Jv L Ll - U L V O S ro O U) U M a d y -A Id O L -H O "a . U ri r X a) ra O a/ a a H O ) •H •ri sa ( J.. O W > L a) U H A t71 al N a N G > N H A E )4 H a) rd .C 7 x ro ro •r1 a) )1 `O .i O W a) >t O !4 lJ tJ a) O ••-i U o a ro o 3 0 ° m s H N '0 u H > N u JJ L N ll O a) -•1 -r1 N H ,C, b) OJ ,4 a r i N H -rl rd a) U X N x ro ro td 11 C a) u 4 1J 1 U y4 N (d S4 G "C) sa 3 > a) aJ (d 1 Fr 16 N ro > u y ,4 1.7 m (21 O ,H N O N !J a) •4 .4 a) ,4 a) .L' N ri O N U N > N a U 'o a H ra ro N A u tT li !J 3 1J 3 N .i ('•1 M aM to •y r QJ O O ~1 .-f ~ N .i H ~M ~ U1 .i H ~ .1 ri O N N N rl M d N N : ro b O > U 0 a - 4 b o > G a 11 rd Id '[i> X -.i d 0 L a L O 'O U y wwq td i Id m '0 -H H O a) u u :j O 0 Q H -4 3 0 44 U O w n ro U 3 C .1 + a) H 3 lj 0) 3l G O U} H 0 -H m -,1 0 O H a) > w a u -4 10 a) H 10 -4 O 3 H N .C rt W U 1 H "d FC 1d O O ) w u U) (d '.y 3 F: U 0 i-1 H w )a 0L,' 0 U1 U) U 0 u u S o 'O H 0 ~ a wzz A ro o 3 11 Id H r O U) ri +A-~ H o a ,,~x7Zp.7~ u O ro H 1N1{{ rt1 a N El) U ~ [ "Ri 0 a ~ U as °y 10 a~ 3 a) w • ° - w U d z u )i U) Q o u 4 Q o a a) o a y , m a 7w. O °w W a r a z O °w W ~l C x :4 O w w ~ P'. z O °w w ~ w O W' z O a'i O z C) °w W a u ~a 0i z O °w w a q o P' z O °w w «a xW 2 O En En E. P; ri H 0 m cn HH' F 0.'r O ,i .U w an H 0 H Gi w U) H~' E+ C. a) X U) m H 0 u) v! H 0 H /P'. 3 o M U) H 0 H P; w .G w cn H H C4 U) U) Hy++ - U N 0 O 5 v O [V~! U 0 r. -4 0 fd A 3 3 u w tlY L •H C4 0) }(d H H 3 2f 3 u (d u g rt .i N M T 1I1 lp 1~ m a O e-1 N M V to V7 0 O O H N M e! tl1 H '•i .-i N N N .•i H N N N N N N N N N 'i N a3 N .14 H a) U A O u O Ln in N 0 ro E A w 41 44 -W -4 H 0 v Sr' a) s 44 o a (a u b A a) 0 rO O -H 41 H A o ~ 44 ~ q •'i X a) :J A H O o A (D o U O w b FS N w 7 wg 4-4 4-1 X F' L O O a) 'c' 0 w H r u 41 3 w N ° u ~ 0 .Gi o 'H) U R U N H O 44 JJ ••i 1 a) O ,C U .U ?i H O .L) to •H 3 •.i td o- l u L14 .q o -H 0 0 0 41 w 0 'L) bp u H IJ (1) C. N 41 41 'i w a) li o d •Zii I v u>i u P U) q W 3 0 0 N > N •H O ? li I-i Id -14 -'i w rd to H 3 44 to 0) r w L u ri x 2 -•i li u .ri u w y •.i 'Cl o w to o O a) (d H a) ati H C~ (d w H (a W w 4J CL -ri A H U) A W N r1 a) 7j u U w L q H 'O -i ro P, H a 0 w •i Ed U . a4 •CH iJ '0 ri Cam,' (d -i 1 0 41 01 H W 2 •14 -.I •H is id H H U O H H U .1-i H w (d W a m m i m 0 > i to rd 'd w o ro 41 o `i C wu o 4 tb 3 + 7 H w E -H bf u o }g~ a U -'i o Q L H to a) > w H is 0.) C: H al ro fd w (d O a 0 O .U -IQ) W •C (D w O x L f ra (a 1) rd > a) U w H 3 li (d (d -ri O , a) V C" 43 a U N N M ;1 pq N 0 0 J' j u u U u 01 O a) w N U (a O N bt H -'1 a -4 7, 3 O U; 3 0 ~j >J rn a) y r 4 ~ > a N w C O 0 ? O H O Q) -n 0 O 0 w i) O .H O 'O 0 w .U u u L; 14 0 2 0 .C w u H H ~ ui -H G w w rQ R 0 at H 3 v G :J.C o r rd ro (no Ot w a) 4 0 2 w to (d 0 a C o rt tm U U 0 r' m w q a) > o .i 0 L H b) C a) T) al ° _ H O (D 0 :3 N N U _ 1J E+ 4 L O M El A O G A O O a 0 0 w U a) L > o ri 1, A m in o o 71 w a) a q N ,0G (U (d -ri E -1 H -,1 v H H G a) u o w 3 u 0) u) H 0 H O O a Q) 7 Qf rd U r-i m N a x H 1~ 0 rC a) O C w -H w (n C N U 3 H O °U H H f1, C a) O H a H O E U -rl O L ra a) C 7 Id O 1,' w A 4-i a s •H Gall G w cn (0 U) -ri ll O rd 1J y G y N w m to (a b o t) 0 0) u rd o 0 7 a) 3 w 3 U Q) G H rt G -H H u -.i C O .u 7 H. H H H H w C q U > a A L E C G -O a) m :j O a) a) rd Ol L b O Q) O a) cd ro 3 a L ro A ,C fo o U b ,G U A rd u E 3 y li H r~ .n c ~n ~n r m m o ~ n .n in o n ~ 'i .i H .i •i H ri t•i tY tai N nl Q) o ~ N \ M N N ~ H 0 10 U) Ham'~-"' N U N ::j zU fd L a a m 0z H °a~ N w H 7 di }i m ora Cl I-i N M N N \ .H O H V) u1 . H N U tq zU H 1 L a oz i7 •-i H m O ~ H 44 a) a O 7 O U U) 2S C ••i J'. r-i N U) W 7 3 C r ~ fd ~ O) C: v o a o 0 u In 44 k m •r i ~ > a O U) rl O •ri rO Fi rd d C 3 m N N w w H U rt$ N U fd .U w N O 0 O r-i N N ri N 11 A.1 U r1 1) Si W . \ • r; En ~4 fo a) a) s yi ro A a) (d O to H C ff) o a 3 o C y a u a y (d 1-4 o )i N ! a) ro N N ri C 4 JJ i 4 -4 N N O w tfj -r1 C O w 4-3 C a) r 4 O 0 x U -4 a ?1 a) ro 4 C z d N !J C iJ - ro L C )i C U (d C U •rl ,C AJ - L L a) N t3 ro H H U a) .U -r1 L H z° ° ti ° r a rd w 3 w o y H N m ~ a A 41 C G ~~H a) e { M t71 > 41 , ~ 11 O U w O O a i a a ro a 7 , a) a a x 1J p ' O y iJ x q H U o Z x r 9 x O « ii w a) WW+ r-1 .u zi U N H H H N U W U W a) ~1 U U m a O O U al O •.i W H H o x > o o H O N o IX 0 a d W WW C w W P: W Cl C W w a, W W to (4 W H Pi W W to r4 WW a) 4 .U w W w C4 w k a) x Si P4 W W z 3 z z o x w z W z o z w 2 U 1d W z 10 aS z O O O H O •r1 S4 d O H E O H N i~ O H ~l C O 1 a) a O N ri a o H z H m r-i r-1 cn H w Nq t a ti H to f H N w Fi ~ to < H H w 2 C w RC H to .i 8 N H to `c~~n^^ ro W U2 N H W H C r-I to ~ • H L L w H H W H .4. 'C ai A 11 ( Y' m ~H-+ C > N cn H" O O ° a) O g r0 rµ~ , ' A ~rT ry x y , u U U) O U i) U U li U N U 1 U G N U 0 O U 0 ~ 0) . 0 41 a) 4j r-A H (d ° C >1 a )t 1d S.' U •n .iJ C iJ .C O O O fd b b) ° JJ a C C H 1) N v N a t=. O L -r A i H N o O C N S $4 O w a) ~ .G` N )i O !i k .C N O - It ro O 3 a to a W 1J •ri li H a a H N M stl to N t` m O , O H N th •W ftf b t` m a, O N N M d tt> 1 . -i .-1 ,-f N .--i .i .i- .-1 .-i N N N N N N L o 0 d) U o z w M a) id rl id o ~ ~ 4 w 3 m G d O) 0 0 ~ -4 -14 C ' Al . C .U C C l4 .C iJ r i W H ri ro O •r1 to .U L x O 4-) C H 01 S: U N a ?a X O i) a) C b .u -ri ) fd a) 1 }4 >1 O b -4 O H .-i a N u i 3 v a w a J d a 0 ro a al to C y r o Ol a C C w U to to x ••i g N 3 r•. .u rd }i . 3 N C C U .i N U C N U a) is ri a) -,i N C H 0 O N C4 C •ri 3 .u rd C iJ o )J 0 .C H b4 • 4 -n -.i lJ O (L) P, 1J to ri 4J (L) !i •,af H .-t N -N 01 A B ° 3 z 10 N b F„ 'o Q) 10 0 10 W C •ri a) O ii ~ a) W ro N m C !J O U) 3 7 a C > N U > rn O q •i r4 o C C H N a1 b) o o 1 y w rn H p C )i O L a) ?4 H w H C w N H 11 W O a) a 3 4 a u C m w ?4 C ; , ^c , 10 H N -4 .C a 'a L a ro . •d ) rd f`• a) •H •.i r 1 z, a. a) a ri 7 L) ro 11 rd u Id ro w . w a C C U o J to ll a) s w O Q) a) H U w O iJ C C a) a) m !4 O N O x )i a) of L O H FC 1-1 YH U a) O C, L U U y' ri U C C H U N 1) N H A) Q) H 2 ri ° ri U) Si W C U C p H L 41 W U U H w ri i •ri -ri 0.i W fa Qi 'd 2 1 ' A L O W a td :1 A L Id 0 O w O W R', O W !i 7 O W tx m N ?i b 7, J O L O W ty. ri .i tY. U U W L Q O ° y o Z w ro Q w z O -i ~ 44 U) z a z a W ~ C: ~ . r i w u m ,L r -i o w , U ° 44 b ] H Q N w °H 3 H Q) C °H OH O ?i ll r i • ro N to H t E H rd a) O to )n O H r O H M O tl C E M i v) ) ?4 3 H t 0 to u 0 ' 0 M C 3 0 rti 4 N N 1: a ro a -ri o 4 -4 ,-1 yf -ri L ~ ~ Qx H C 1 H C .U .U P: H W H u 4 -4 3 0 (D u 03 u U) 0) A 14 U u U u u o Q J , u i u H O X U 44 . o ri rt m O U) b .~C b) 3 (D C to w a) )-I L w w ro w N •ri U N .,i H H N (d 0 O a O O U - U a }i U 'o U N 4 W U r-i 0) 'O a U 'o (d r, (o -4 O U N 0 O 0 a U .C a W O a O •G •rt ,C L S1 i Id td L N O U N A ll 3 E-+ N .i N M C' N D 07 p , O H N C tD O rl M C Ut M tP f4 y N bl b C f4 3 to li 0 5 cli u 3 0 4 4-) w 3 ° ° y to W aa ~ W d N u~i u w 3 al 3 q N x 1~ -i N L O Lw.' r-1 rd, a) x Fi •,A - 0 JJ -ri :J U Cb 1 O -rl L 'J U L H 11 j.' ri O a) F, r-i u G w .O !s a) 41 0 31 C la w O 0 U w a ro U C, w U u w O to d r• 0 •d sa 3 11 u w 0 H ~ -ri V O -}4 U U 411 -4 1°1 aS 0 11 G =1 O w 11 N w U r-i L .Q N 0 O O (d 4 9 N -4 4 L a) RJ •ri 3 O U to U y O >1 m 0 O ro L y a) U L O w (d m 0 0 H li W -I " w •d to i1 w 1-1 0 U ro w ro a 5 a u G 3 to a m A b d) d a a a H H :5 to O ° w H a H i1 + 4 O (d z X W d) rt O , H H O r. zwz O H m trl to o S 3 u 0 w 0 2 w m a g w ro r 0 o w w w x o x G L to H Q Q .1'r O +1 a1 q D ° m t q ri w s w V r ° w ro 0 o Id o a z to - a H a Nqq o o x x w ro u o m to p En w 6) a H -4 ~d w N Z w(n '•~t Z w 3 w 4 O w aUrd r i z Z to 0 0) w i G 0 -H Q O as o - o as ro m o Q o 0 1-4 0 E W W LL H w H -H w p m p 'O E >1 H H p m w m m A W H CA ri w O to w O w w p cn cn i4 O cn ro id O ix rO H ai H WY w y+ w W' O r. H .H Hy! H O M % U N H H }r • 3 Id T' 3J 1u -,4 E ro 0 +i 00 O O " H N O M O-140 m 4 a u u u 2s ~ ~C w u 9) u w U EQ a) 41 -Y ji 44 0 -4 .114 .,1 41 3 4 U y > .u H V) .C 41 j.` w .C O U1 H-i a -H o N w -4 w m La)d 9 -x S ro ro z rd ° ~4 >1 E p (1) H N M V N b r m (T O H N M V fn b t+ m O H N M ri H .i H H .i N N H N N N N N w F w r• al H 1011 O L A aY la 0 A 0 z O w to 'O b 1.1 -w O N w M O ,G -r1 ri •ri W Ol ro b w t71 w .U :j w H F.' 0 .0 X .C •ri C. •ri m ri 3 a1 ° m }i in u > w 0 w w q H w C N 3 bl r-i }i w )i b iT •O ri w a) to O 41 S-i R N wq w r-1 w Si -14 10 a) W m . 0 0 1 A 4 w 41 q i (dd O o Id O to w N w •ri O -1 H CA y Q 'o ro gg at x r• w v w w w N O w E r3 7 aY r4 w w O Id L H L 0) 3 w n !a v G w ,1 O N ?I H U O O of ,C: .X U H H H S4 ri w a) O ,,G w H (1) (1) U H L 11 rd w b O O -ri ay 4 A ~ 0 (1) E id H U 0 O G U 0 w w u -li w O ,o w Oa O a) w O -ri w O w R5 r4.. H -14 H H •ri M M w 4 -r{ b O U -,q L 7 w w 0 U w 41 w w ro n w w r• 0) w .ri k w 'o w w f, r w -•i O •O U) N H Pt w •,1 }4 N O .al H U a " as to H ri 10 a O) 0 ~ O E ~ r U Lj ~O Q) z r-i W 2 U G z w Q) FC 27 U N N O r'~~~++, 0 W 0 00 rd a O 11 w p a) td w 14 "1 1) a w a w o w aa)i a o Q) m ° 4., o o > 0 0 0 ow 4 01 >l o ro o p o ro ° C4 w P4 w ai w )4 r4 E -rt w a 11 w w 0 w ,q w m w m w m w m w w m to ro z w z w z w w z o ro w z c w a w a w a w u o o 0 a p ° w u w a ° 3 > N H N H m F m •d w Rs F cH71 3 E tq w F O N H D' H a H P', 5y H r1 CYi H O C44' (ryz~~+ w 14i ro 4-4 V ro -N H R7 o u to ll H O w ro ° a r Q w w A w O 0 m b 10 ~ G tT 0 to 0 y L 3 w A0 w ro L w w L w t w X O H 7 3 °w aa) 0 d a a d rd 0 w Q) w w E w w ?i w 14 rd C7 a w z 0 H m H H U N w 4 S4 OD b o r-i N N N .-1 H o H m Er) Hy 4U O Q U y zv H ro L a oz 1 e-i to a H lD Q) 11 m N o ro C) 14 N cV ~ ri r-1 ri O H rjj H N U N 7 zu H rt a a m Hz i 0 a c H N a C G ) w o a: o ~4 H ~ w O r-1 E. 0 H L O 0 O O O (1) O w q ro O o O Hi I ro N G . C U U) •r 1 m L 0 .,q H rou O N 14 > V) 7 r1 N 1 a 0 R S o w r4 O H ~ U O P O w 5 q -a 0 O o w x x w ro O O W 10 G H N U)) N H N 2 a L H H H N Q L) U o ro 4) in, C O N a O L •H O -ri O N ro C w r• N O O 0 0 13 0 CP O O Ri O rt ~ W w U +'i N M ILI l0 r m Ol O .i H N .-I .-1 M V1 H N N ~ ^1 . 1 H !fl Q .-I N f O N •-i N N N M N V1 if1 N N L w w N W I CD a) 0 10 0 a) [ a z H ' u A ro w 10 0 0) C )-I 41 (D U t L w .C to .C L 'O w 'O w w O L C C -ri C •1+ Id N w 10 a) 'LJ C a) O -ri L L % a) C > L C a o d L x (d v O O O L O L O a -r1 L 14 L L U ri M H L U) to L of L -ri (ii w b) O -ri 3 Ci U w O w L o FI 0 w u w 0 o w b) -H ri •rl r-i a a) n trt •ri V) y O 3 w .C L U O U a) O M O •ri L N Id 3 Id rd 2) 0 L rd L ro 10 s a O C•' •rt W r-I R, w rn L ro L w w J-) •H H L L td w m H Si w C•.. (d ?i Id 10 >f id m w IS C 10 to Id H w 4 L 0 O W N w U G' Id H L •ri ~ L O ro d) l 0 1-1 O U C •rr ~a O x L V) .C. L L - H •rl U O L O H L O w O ?i Id •b w ..i H •b A ° ro w N •H q 5 L U a O y 44 b) •C i • w L b A H r-4 o > bCC 1-I n w a) 3 C w O O 0 O 'O N ?4 x O x H O U •r1 N EO N •01 0 U) al x H ri U -,1 3 o r rt b U, rd a •rl m w u b) b) t~ L u d y o ri W A W O TA W rt; rd Q) N 0 C7 W W z o H S4 rd U w Q C •ri U w -.i L si b) C o ri W o w W a £ w z o H W o w W <C 2 a) v w > 10 ,H y A O < a) .C U -ri H 3 z H H C ° o £ W z O H wG W o m 114 W b H :J O 3 N C q p In r 0 L H of (i or r- o f N w x W 2 O H W t~ O u w i W 10 W 0 ~I O H P'. co (n H a) > •H C a . I O H Pi m U) H p O )i 3 L U u t w L w w w H H Pi C O -H H >a •H •-i (]1 M G rd U) U) H H 04 0 N rC x u O 17 E O U rd cn z m C, s. a) Y-1 Id d x u O u U rd a°i -0 L w ~ N C w •.i )4 ~4 w 5 E O U 4 x u to U l q 1 CO U G ~ O U 4 x U L Id 3 L 0 0 O w 01 C u w LL N N r• ,C vi C O ri N 7 b -rt to 1J rn .i rd fn C C r• > x v y o rt r a) 0 ~ ro n 7 a 0 0 0 L n 7 r a) H 6 A rd S4 U u O H v o o .i N 1~ a ~n ~o r m m a ~ N 1n m o .1 N m w y m oro ~ H N -rf N N H H zro o ~d H V) U) H w 0a U N U ?7 H U rt aid w u) oz 9-1 H ~g U3 L H w d) ord o r•i N -ri M N N ri o H W H U N zu H a P. W oz r-i W O 14 H m t0 owN 0TOWN OF LOS GATOS ITEM NO.: PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT ~Og GAZOS Meeting Date: J rarr-2 , 2008 cev') tom, PREPARED BY: Sandy L. Baily, AICP Associate Planner APPLICATION NO.: Subdivision Application M-07-005 General Plan Amendment GP-07-01 Zone Change Z-07-001 Variance Application V-07-01 LOCATION: 115 N. Santa Cruz Avenue and 112 Wilder Avenue. (115 N. Santa Cruz is located on the west side of N. Santa Cruz Avenue approximately 175 feet north of Bean Avenue. 112 Wilder Avenue is located on the east side of Wilder Avenue approximately 150 feet north of Bean Avenue.) APPLICANT: John Lien PROPERTY OWNER: Santa Cruz Wilder, LLC CONTACT PERSON: Grant Sedgwick, (408) 655-9296 APPLICATION SUMMARY: Requesting approval of 1) a Lot Line Adjustment, 2) a General Plan Amendment from Medium Density Residential to Central Business for a portion of the parking lot parcel, 3) a Zone Change from R-ID:LHP to C-2:LHP for a portion of the parking lot parcel, and 4) conversion of the existing parking lot which fronts on Wilder Avenue to a residential lot, on properties zoned C-2:LHP and R-1D:LHP. No significant environmental impacts have been identified as a result of this project, and a Mitigated Negative Declaration has been previously made for this proposal. APN 510-17-065 and 071 DEEMED COMPLETE: January 17, 2008 FINAL DATE TO TAKE ACTION: General Plan Amendments and rezoning applications are considered to be legislative acts and are not governed by the Permit Streamlining Act. The subdivision application must be acted on by July 16, 2008. RECOMMENDATION: Forward a recommendation for approval of the General Plan Amendment and Zone Change to Town Council. Approve Subdivision application for the lot line adjustment. PROJECT DATA: General Plan Designation: Central Business District and Medium Density Residential Zoning Designation: R-ID:LHP and C-2:LHP ATTAC KENT 5 I Plainning Con-lmission Staff Report - Page 2 115 N. Santa Cruz Avenue February 13, 2008 Applicable Plans & Standards Parcel Size: Surrounding Area: Commercial Design Guidelines .59 acres (both parcels) Existing Land Use General Plan _ J Zoning North Single Family/Commercial _ Medium Density Residential/Central R-1D:LHP/ C-2 Business District East Commercial Central Business C-2 District South Single Medium Density _ R-1D:LHP/ Family/Commercial Residential/Central C-2 Business District t Nest I Single Family . Medium Density i _ R-1D:LHP Residential CEQA: It has been determined that this project will not have a significant impact on the environment and a Mitigated Negative Declaration has been previously made for this proposal. FINDINGS: ■ All General Plan Amendments must be internally consistent with the General Plan. ■ The Planning Commission must make a finding that the Zone Change is consistent with the General Plan if its recommendation is for approval. ■ That the work proposed is consistent with the Redevelopment Plan for the Central Los Gatos Redevelopment Project Area (Section IV.B). ■ As required by Section 29.20.170 of the Town Code for granting a Variance. CONSIDERATIONS: None ACTION: 1. Recommendation to Town Council for the General Plan Amendment and Zone Change. 2. The decision of the Planning Commission for the Lot Line Adjustment is final unless appealed within ten days. EXHIBITS: 1 - 21. Previously Submitted Planning Commission Staff Report - Page 3 115 N. Santa Cruz Avenue February 13, 2008 BACKGROUND: On January 23, 2008, the Planning Commission closed the public hearing and continued the above referenced applications due to the late hour of the meeting. The Commission acted on the Architecture and Site application, the Conditional Use Permit and the Mitigated Negative Declaration associated with the pending applications at the January 23, 2008 meeting. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant is requesting approval of the following: 1. General Plan Amendment to change the land use designation for a portion of the parking lot parcel from Medium Density Residential to Central Business, 2. Rezoning of a portion of the parking lot parcel from R-1D:LHP to C-2:LHP, 3. Lot Line Adjustment to reflect the General Plan Amendment and Zone Change, 4. Variance to eliminate parking in the Parking Assessment District to convert the existing parking lot which fronts on Wilder Avenue to a residential lot. REMARKS: A. Project Site The .59 acre project site consists of two parcels. The N. Santa Cruz Avenue parcel is developed with the historic Coggeshall Mansion, which is occupied by the Trevese Restaurant and Lounge. The Wilder Avenue parcel is located within the Almond Grove Historic District and is developed with a parking lot that provides parking for the Trevese Restaurant. An alley runs between the two parcels. B. General Plan Amendment and Rezoning In order to approve the proposed lot line adjustment a General Plan Amendment and Zone Change must first be approved for 3,871 square feet of land area adjacent to the alley (Exhibits 3 and 4). General Plan Amendment The General Plan designation of the 3,871 square foot portion of property at 112 Wilder Avenue is currently Medium Density Residential. The applicant proposes to Planning Commission Staff Report - Page 4 115 N. Santa Cruz Avenue February 13, 2008 combine this portion of land with the property at 115 N. Santa Cruz Avenue which has a General Plan Designation of Central Business District. So that the property at 115 N. Santa Cruz Avenue does not have two General Plan Designations, the applicant is proposing to designate the portion of property in question as Central Business District. 2. Zone Change The zoning designation of the 3,871 square foot portion of property is currently R- 1 D:LHP. The applicant proposes to combine this portion of land with 115 N. Santa Cruz Avenue which has a zoning designation of C-2:LHP. So that the property at 115 N. Santa Cruz Avenue does not have two zoning designations, the applicant is proposing to rezone the portion of property in question to C-2:LHP. C. Lot Line Adjustment The applicant is proposing to modify the lot lines of the N. Santa Cruz Avenue parcel to include a portion of the Wilder Avenue parcel so that parking spaces serving the existing and proposed commercial uses on the N. Santa Cruz Avenue parcel would be located on the same parcel. The lot line adjustment will not increase the number of lots and both parcels will remain conforming as to lot size. Following is a comparison between the existing and proposed parcels. Existing Land Proposed Land Existing Use Proposed Use Area Area 115 N. Santa Cruz 14,230 sq ft 18,101 sq ft Commercial Commercial Avenue 112 Wilder Avenue 11,246 sq ft 7,375 sq ft Commercial Single Family parking lot Residence D. Variance The applicant is proposing to convert the commercial parking lot on Wilder Avenue to a residential use. This project proposes a net removal of 13 commercial parking spaces. Section 29.10.150 (5) of the Town Code states that parking spaces credited in the PAD cannot be eliminated. Twenty of the on-site parking spaces are credited in the PAD calculations for the site. If parking spaces are eliminated, a Variance is required. Under the provisions of Section 65906 of the State Government Code, a Variance is appropriate if there are any unusual or special circumstances that encumber or place any undue hardships on a property. This parcel is located in the PAD, a unique area established Planning Commission Staff Report - Page 5 115 N. Santa Cruz Avenue February 13, 2008 by the Town in order to relieve the parking issues surrounding the downtown area. When the PAD was established, the concept that a property owner may want to reduce their land use intensity was never considered; therefore, the Town Code did not include any provisions to reduce the parking requirements. Since the applicant is proposing to remove the parking lot to accommodate a residential use and still meet the required parking for the commercial use, an undue hardship would be imposed on the property owner by denying the project based solely upon the removal of these parking spaces. The Commission approved a similar Variance request in 2007 on Almendra Avenue, to convert a parcel which had an office use to a residential use. By approving this project, the Town would not be granting a special privilege not enjoyed by other property owners. Therefore, Town staff believes that the findings can be made to grant a Variance. The applicant has submitted a letter to justify the Variance (Exhibit 10). a. Parking Lot The Wilder Avenue parcel contains a parking lot for the existing commercial use and a trash enclosure. Access to the parking lot is from Wilder Avenue and the alley. The parcel has a General Plan designation of Medium Residential and a R-1D:LHP zone which allows a residential use. Therefore, the existing parking lot use is nonconforming. The conversion of the parking lot to a residential use would make the use of the parcel conforming. In addition, the construction of a residence would complete the residential character of the street by eliminating a commercial use in a residential neighborhood and would increase the Town's housing stock. The trash enclosure was previously approved to be relocated at the rear of the N. Santa Cruz Avenue parcel along the southern property line. b. Parking There are 22 parking spaces on the project site (16 spaces in the Wilder Avenue parking lot and six spaces along the alleyway) and 44 parking spaces in the Parking Assessment District (PAD) for a total of 66 spaces. The project would reconfigure the two project parcels so that the parking spaces along the western side of the alley would be part of the N. Santa Cruz Avenue parcel. The project would result in a reduction of 13 on-site parking spaces. Due to the Commission's action denying the three parking spaces proposed on the east side of the alley (which included an accessible space), the accessible parking space must remain on the west side of the alley. Maintaining the accessible space along the west side of the alley will reduce the number of proposed spaces along the alley from ten to nine due to the required dimensions of accessible spaces. Planning Commission Staff Report - Page 6 115 N. Santa Cruz Avenue February 13, 2008 With the 44 spaces in the PAD, the project would have a total of 53 parking spaces. Based on the change in use as discussed in the previous report, the parking requirement for the commercial site would decrease and the proposed parking requirement would be met. The proposed residential lot on Wilder Avenue will require two parking spaces. A conceptual location of a two car garage for this property has been shown on the development plans which will have access from the alley. The following table outlines the required parking for the commercial use and takes into account the elimination of the two proposed retail buildings and the parking proposed on the east side of the alley which the Planning Commission denied. USE AREA/ RATIO PARKING # OF SEATS REQUIRED Office Restaurant Proposed Parking In District 44 On Site 9 Total Parking Required Parking Excess Parking TOWN COMMITTEE MEETINGS: A. General Plan Committee 1,262 sq ft 1/250 sq ft 6 135 seats 1/3 seats 45 53 51 2 On February 28, 2007, the General Plan Committee considered the applicant's request to amend the General Plan Designation and change the zone for a portion of the parking lot parcel. The Committee recommended approval of the General Plan Amendment and Zone Change subject to the approval of the other applications associated with the entire project. SUMMARY: Staff has made the following conclusions about the project: The proposed General Plan Amendment and Zone Change should be recommended for approval and the Lot Line Adjustment should be approved to allow a residence on Wilder Avenue. Planning Commission Staff Report - Page 7 115 N. Santa Cruz Avenue February 13, 2008 2. The elimination of the parking lot on Wilder Avenue to allow a residential use should be approved. RECOMMENDATION: If the Planning Commission concurs with staff's summary above, the Commission should take the following actions: Recommend that the Town Council adopt the General Plan Amendment and Zone Change (Exhibits 3 and 4). 2. Recommend that the Council adopt the Mitigation Monitoring Plan (Exhibit 9). As part of the Commission's motion at its January 23, 2008 meeting to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration, the Commission did not include the adoption of the required Mitigation Monitoring Plan. It is understood that the majority of mitigation measures will no longer apply to the project based on the Commission's action at the previous meeting to deny the proposed two new buildings which were part of the Architecture and Site application. 3. Make the required findings (Exhibit 2). 4. Approve the Lot Line Adjustment subject to conditions (Exhibit 5). 5. Approve the Variance. Prepared by: Sandy L. Baily, Associate Planner BNL: SLB:ah r r Approved by: Bud N. Lortz, Director of Community Development cc: John Lien, 196 College Avenue, Los Gatos, CA 95030 Santa Cruz Wilder, LLC, 50 W. San Fernando Street #320, San Jose, CA 95113 N:\DEV\REPORTS\2008\nsc 115. l.doc ~ N C O O L 41 N ~ O N - ~ li td tll A" N w to H p a) UU 2 •d 41 O S .t 1 -I 11 'd N v 0 b ~ T7 bi H O 0 b Id C~ 'CS Ut S4 N N N 1-1 J-1 W .C U ji OD ?i J Ln CN 3 mU o C o ~ C o b c C U `V as o .-i O d y 1 Id . m G ( \ • i _ r'1 3y 3 I r O r L Sa Id L 9 Sk N 0 al .-i 0 p O U 3 ~ N U) N 1 d q N 0 -,1 a) 4J S 'O N rl ra 1i O C) I W id O ?a O rt S., O Z U N i W U , U 7'. o O O D ~ A ,C Id -4 Q) 41 td ii ol tm all U) 44 Fi Ej a U rs to id 3 ri 3 O r- U3 -rq H U 0 C w _4 C w C :j 0 td C rd P4 H w N 0 d a N u > 0 5. .-i -H b u cb U~ u li u a N C 41 a a q r C td 4 W u a li N C as I z u O O !4 .U 0 A td Uf }4 O W z C N w C 0 I y C C ! v U -.i U w H td ~y 41 ' to 0 - O 0 U N d 0 u i. m , yt a p ri m -i )4 h m H <s O -.i a , FC N w . A .11 o a m 0 z o • w d 0 a m m 5 1 m •ri ri 11 •rl Si µ ' U1 W L a W i v o i t o t o ' Q w o in z ap r ys_ A 1 O L m •'I m •H a a u v - - F y a I C ,.i td rA o C N Et cn C tn m o , g ..ji 5 o m jj cn N o U 0 JJ td q 7+ t4 t4 H 1-1 U 14 H w 4J I i mi 0 0 J 3 ~W7 ~ m En - 0 a e ri m •.i 4 •ri H Y H to O i ri -4 0 C o 1 N Id 10 U 4 7 ji d i 2t w i m o tm ri b C ° :3 d ~ iJ bi Si ' U ro C U 4-I td to C >1 df I d 1." .0 H i N rt ri to v E 0 3A H p rd C O A y rt Pa U A w 11 o H r-i a a o 0 0 -H v p tm 3 a C a p L A £ td L A A ri N f+l O u1 b t` [.O of o H Nf ~ N b r m Of .-i N N V N H H H H ri ri ri H ri r/ N N N N N N N N a .,t U ai m C u CD N 0 m tD U O *6 .4 .-I U m O N rt4 N - C u 4) ~ o ~ H , VqN 4 - af- m m3 N 7x U q 0 n N A m H 0.1 4 i • ty rq np! H atn N ri O N W - O 0 U d - 01 , 1-" O 1 - 0 O O ~ ?4 . i vt H ri7~4 aEU);4 W~ O vi m H 'J O N U u ch v z H RS 44 u O ~d 1-1 vi G O a a li 0 ~z b N A E. tn N w 14 am qq Q) a ro ri S O L W G L Id -H li J.J y4 O : C7 _1 m m m U m C) G C rz y 0 4 H . a U 4 U H r-i N a ~n m r m m o ~ n a ~n m r` m o ~ ~n ATTACHMENT 6 ° a w " L L N v ro m L ro ~ ~ U rH Id C N N N ° b al rH U 10 X3 m o ro m ro ~ L > rn rrJ L E C 41 L O N W Ol N N N C r. C L O 3 3 a N v N O m (6 4 O u U d r• L O •.i ,4 A 4 W $ 0Y x L W LW ° ro w n rn o 3 o L m L N •ri a) b) ro N N N C L r-I-I 4 N .4 L to • 0 O Ch to N a) 4 0 41 L 1-1 N 4 (1) 2. L td o to ro N C .4 4' ,H 4) -4 o ro C". N G , 4 L •.i U a I~ O N 5 x U G O O •14 4 L 4 L N m •-f U rH r{ O U 4 L , L O (n 4) L N N •,1 -.t m w .b m 3 'd 3 L 2i S: a v 0 N 4 O a x w Id N Id tm m L N o m C -.-1 N ri a 41 U U a) k .-i m o U L w w (d N ro (d m H 3 M 4) Au L u 4 3 o d ° m 41 N 0 N 41 0 ro N m H u N H N c.- U O N p E R E G td rl tL ,-t (a N o N w C.' 0 -,I L m Id U .14 S4 L N I U O L a PI x N m P, 0 -4 0 •ri C 4) 4 L a) df .r.. L N L rd f~i L ••A 3 L -.H 0 a w L L INd L m Q) x O Ca~ Pi O W W O m C O U to 4) W ~ a qq of - L rd 4 R d O L ro a) L N O 3 L U a If N 4) L ° m J-,-' L ttf L 10 to R O 'O m m m N b Id 0 4) 5 QI 3 `>y td 3 r• m 41 N •r) R m 0 Id 9 m -8 1 Id 1 r -I 0 rt ~-i to 4 !4 'Jv gNg a) W R N 7 H 1 Oi 3 x L tV 0 Pai L L 0 4j O U u L (d 4 L n 4) ro d m N u GS vH a O N N 4) 4 L N R N a) 14 m 0 L 4 a) " L la O q -H Lt fH O H a m j: $ to x N m H L Id Q) .4 L - H ro N N A U ed L `tl @3 $ Gd 3 L N a •H 41 o L w ro N W h U ° L 25 y rm-I Id rtt H a) : ~ Id N w rd N g L ~ R W m - 3 N 4 L O m U •rr a }4 a N a) to ~ O U v G Q H O v 9 C i N t4 •rt O 5, O tY 3 L Id J ) to 3 m ~ •,Lt r~-t L 4 . L, x .Ci •r m x a H 0, H x N N A rH fd .C L v U id U) o L w O a .q L }-1 L •ri o U o .4 •rr L Id O Id U L ,4 L q •rl N N N M ~Y N I D t` QO m O N M V 1R b r W ~ O H N M W N .-I N .-I r-1 rf N .i ri N N N N N N N a) a• M N o 'd n3 tv N ri .-t o •x H cn • N •mj U Ch U H qi w C/I U) z E- m ~a ° H *LS x O 'O O 41 q w O t i W m O 0 q L f.' U) N CL N .4 O b) L ttl C O O a) 4 1°1 •.m~y1 O - lad O L ro L -r1 0 b) O •ri m 4 O tY •ri L to r♦ -4 m +i z a) •rt L L -rl L E L 2i 4l O :5 w to L 0 Q to rs mu -4 O td O r-H w N O O R -ri a) -H m U F, w b U U y O 1 41 m v '.a o N .14 o p 3 w r• v O w r-t rH Rr N 'r4 16 .mCi (D a .C N b 1-4 y -ri L N d N U N O R L O U H R O t) •H al Id .4 U O U Q •rf N al ItS w (d m o m 4) O a) O 0 to w m q m a) C, zn rd 3 ro N L ? U b b) a) 0 q 10 4) A u L O d 4 L {ter 0 L L a) a) A m > rr o o O b) H -A L m D H 3 L C L 4) R o U L o m o C N m b b •r) b o -ri G 3 x b N m rd N .H (d o 4) L q 14 w rd (1) x w m (1) w N 'O N O r-i o Q a) O Q L O 1-' ri 1~ w 4) b) -k b 41 19 .C N m 4) W ro Pt rd ,4 N L N N L L r• 3 G A L a) r-I U 4' L z •ri 4) q w •14 a) 4) -4 10 N ro L G G w r L N 3 .u q ,-i A N G m r rd C rd O 10 b N U u U 3 'O fi A L u br o ll U L Id L C En x U Id .4 O C a tr U G m (d E dd o b 3 ro H N o G dl ri 4) ro a) ,4 N m .-I u O A N U 0 •14 L ro u a) ,4 L N Ci P, b U 47 O -i + .4' L ri r-I Id L L O R, O O O r-i to •r1 a ~j m a) -H r-I m Ca] }I U) C. ~r Cx] A•. m a) U o m N O L ,i.-' L (d a C U° L If P: 3 0 r Si A P L Id L N YI 0) O (d N 7 L O 0 N FC tT Or 4) U (1) C, O 0 D, D E m L ,-i C m m •ri •H 0 W N U 0 ri ,Q NN o ro v •rl C C w 1-409 aW > G N U Q W q L L rH .4 4 fa x O O w 7 R 0 N ~G U 3 L U) r U L L N b •n U ° •rCi Na R3 a H o m E F+ E- m 1J L w k a m m N L >r 7 ri FC 5 •rr U 4) G 4) to H > b H Q L O N 3 .4 w U L G •rf U) C4 -H g O N k r G a L L U ro r a) tT o ° U Q > 4) U w b L o (o a) L o r; U) rd (d r a) M m -,-1 7 a) ri N H N .a o 3 U ry Nu La o li o 4 4 L L d 10 N ri N L L H N L N m Q) L a) y k •r1 m U k N U a) C -r1 > a) m I~ ,r~ (1) rd u o M •H A o o 3 o U 4 rT ,c v C ti~ A v ~ b k 0 L m L 10 -H k O O w -H m U Iv u -.-1 C r a d)L .c. 00 a U u 1 3 h a v 3 m m fo k Id li L L N N M W to •O r OJ O• O N p, .i M .-I ~ .-i .-1 .i .i •-1 a .i N N N cl •+i N N co S4 oqj N r-I M 3 \ N N ri O LS H N E .4 U U U H Id u a mz pH rrn-I C7 rH W O Ij H m ,i o w .NU H .G' O p N o r~i a.i 11 41 0 7 W 1. -1 0 L N C.1 G,' a) Ol H U U U H N 0 ~ w ro G ro q v u w 10 o m d H U r~i )-1 N ro H rd ~4 H H w -.a .u w E G U° N K1 N •a •`i 7 ro '-i u O a o N a) ¢t ,C a) w b) Id ° N k U N rd U O N -rri O N 1~1 H11 A U b N '}Qj 3 •a 55 U N -U Id N O A N Y, O H U uU N N N 'O .q U. N a) (a w -4 Ln w •,4 u N m 10 3 3 ~ u o u d) k r N r v L a) 0 F! N N :J r G V4 V) W W N S, G L °i O H (d rd 3 N vU N ,q •~t Syi, a) N (1) O Id N -4 u rd =1 L Id U O O O) f-) ? O a) H 3a R! N F rO U o 14 o x -4 x lq C N O ~ x > L N 11 .G a) ~ H a ~ 4J 44 li En x L u a N qq o .i w 44 44 Id 0 O ~ w H N r4 w W o N El (d u 1 w W N -H rd w O L d) 't7 -4 1-4 0) li N ~ •••1 N d) 'X a G E-t U H '!a a) X. 3+.. 5 fi H td N b 4J C O U O 44 .-I W 0 N O 0 41 (d qq oA O O 2S O N N O Rt (d W m N )4 of R: m U O b id -A b (d u L' y i y O 'O X d) N O (d Q U (a R O 14 N (d a N Id 0) Rj U rd L N r-i ro 41 W W H O z O r' JJ U ° '-1 U O -4 o ro fd to 3 ° HH Q v dd)) H , w rcl li to 44 tom 3 a 0 b 6 -NO a ¢f u to (d ~4 m H (d r- En 3 : O t'. lad N to a) d) A •.O•i Id N L HH1)4 U -H H fi k -Hr1' fd U U U Cp (D 41 41 0 w 0 -4 FO L U U H 3 to p H w L FS Ri SC % i+ ro U O r. U •.i 'a N N -.Oi 11 m di a 14 -,1 4J Id Q) a) 4 Q. H t 0 w d) 0 U C.1 > Id .0 ~ Ul P 3 dl b N H 1-1 O N U W .X H O 41 U Id N NN 3 N C Id Li N r-i N b1 p N 'pa U N a) 4) ~ p O rt! 1~) q ° a w L ~ -°i Id 4A.1 aS 3 u 3 r1 U v 3 N r~ v in (o r m m o N en ~ v1 ~o r m m o N m d, m " ~ ~ ^i H N .-1 ei N N N N N N y > -,1 ' y >1 az o u A 114 4J u v to o H W m L 4J ro ro ai d ;H ro rn + G A o A o 4J 0 .A Id o m -.A w >1 A dt aUi W 0 ~ 'Cl a ki 3 O u w o ° r 10 41 H O o u G'. 8) N N L Fa ,C'. N >1 X O RS C '1 O L o H ° ro L y°) )N1 N 3 Id QU1 " n 2s w v ui d :3 3 b i w A N L o ri W ° 4 UA- M L ro a) N .o o Cam. U 3 o L O(-. W H rd O d) X S4 `O U -H N X g W N N L O a w U a) 5 Q) k N 3 k ° d ut rn o a ro H Z 1°) ; 10 fd o u w ~i ro w v u u °u m o k d) U 9 W H H o v a ro 3 0 14 u b o 0 v m 0 a A L G W U O ~ O CUd m -,O. O 'O N O -01 bl -0 a N o H Ul r.i ~C~yd bl (d dk) U (d qqN 'U R N o (d t-i 01 3 r0 N cG a) N U u a1 m 2 C a o u a) ~o -H H (d -Ni z A > a 5 rt " L " 2 L G N H w , b m H x m G a o m ° v 3 3 rn > b o U o U o ° H U •.i U U N y 1-1 0 -H -,1 H (1) 1t )33 N O 'tl m u O C7' L 'O N .-i x a) X U b H 11 a) Q O Q) a ro a k 3 o r ro w w o N rl x 3 ° u° o run o o ro o U (n Q) a ° o o' U 0) q a) 0) y, U U144 M. J U S4 O N N o v O U U U O A R H k ro N N U V y b N U O 3 O a rd a N li O w O ro ro a) trlN U y k t~ O Id U X U a) U k O " 1 U N 7 a) (0 u ro 3 N u 10 Q) A m L L v b) k u to .C 7O v r.C U (d 3 7 S-1 ti N rn C N to ~D O~ O N I!1 lD ~ O W v OD k m b CV H rn $ \ N N f-+ H LS U d) H U H Id a m w Cry 7 H Ln C~7 '•1 O 1-4 N A4 CO }4 O 14 N r-i m \ N c~ .H O .3) H W U M 2 ~ H td na. cn 0z C7 t to o H v1 b) 44 0 c u yJ - t6 N bt 0 X o "A O O °i N O N m N )i a) v b C 3 AI 0 iJ w 41 "u fd v 3 N a) 0 •.i u ' ' A N 4 a) 27 -4 N Id A L w w N a) O 3 11 O a 4) A o N to " ° o o 0 Id !j o U -1 N 44 a a) L N N N N (d H 7 R n• N C U Id N 7 of .13 (d a) 3 1 u .U Id ,C U )i 0) O 3 x ro U U N H •r♦ a 0 4) 44 4-1 O L N L •C L li Id 3 ri (d W R !.1 Q Q `0 O W O U N H N b) •H U N N Id (D •rl ro O 3 C N N a ul d) ~ to N Q) H ~ 4-3 ~ a N ri W- .-A . 1 Id 4 1d a) H N a) U rl qq X U U y." y U 41 N •,q q td v •rl m :j m N 0) U N a4 a N W Id .4" E d Q .-4 1 d O C O U .i; b) ,I - -.i A -A E O •JV -X Id .4" U N P+ 9 U li ri a U 0 G S-i N ~-7 ~d H ,C H H O to a) ~~ss77 O t4 W •.i n• N W •s~ .4) (i a{ H H U )a (d Z 0 U - N ~L E n• 41 Id X N C 0 u r U 10 g b1 z x n• (d C b a N 0 20 Q O w Ill a 41 1-4 N 0 >4 00 Q O N 6) N }4 0 ~N .I~ E 4 IJ O 70~ Q O t,~ t>~ ,Hi (d 0 0 r-1 (1) .c E 0 u 1-4 w U p (d a 4-3 0 ri q b (1) r+ i o u m l x w z o o N u '0 Q P 04 o P4 w z o 1'4 m w (a ro a1 p u O .1~ 43 H ° ~ D 1J , H N to) Id N M 4-1 t 'n E !4 a) id U x 4 u) N a )n N cn d) J.'., C ro U 44 ° a iJ N H N ~ 1.1 Q) ?I H .C Ul •r) 71 rd y H 0.'. F-4 o o z i + C + o u U 0 o 3 o o a) co qq m bi ,1 (D U U 1 U U L Id a) 0 - 4 ri 0 W L p U C4 1 1 .0 41 0 `rt v ° C 0 H ~-r u 1. y 44 N ~ E O 0 ° a) Id W 0 -1 r N $4 :j R) •rl a a (d .1 . i -,4 a 44 a H to 0 N q A U 4J id ,G 3 a) b •,1 N dJ 0 1-1 4) J., U Ida .4" U li u 0 a 41 0 u a (N 'y 0 U 0 .U a ,L" lU - 4 4J -H H N M d, Vt b ( ~ m w O H N M a to b r m Of o N M V~ in ei H ri r{ H .-i rl '1 e-i e-i N N N N N N ro } N a) O li >1 id ro U N 14 .a1 N •C E U .U H L - 1.1 N •ri .u) (D 3 A) Q) Id )1 N (1) 1-1 0) ul w Id r-i H 4 N ro O )4 JJ ri -4 O 0 N 1J a U N a) u u) a) 14 N a r-) -H A ~4 H 10 N a) A (d o v . q ro Id x to (d w 3 •I`dd N rd N r-1 0) 0) QI 0 4J .14 4 td q N t 0 A N - H H N (r' N O H V N .~r+ r) O JJ ro0 1J a) ''Y rt U a tm L C IJ $4 L 11 C N va 4j q O 1d O .r, .C O -3 n1 :X N o m H O O -H W H v A 44 U bl .i-I H to 0) fd > ~ U " C m a) N 0 a) ro 0 u u 'o x 0 rn o N F4 C H u C rda) v G)3 4 C Id to a) .,a n• 5 w a) # aS 0) A A N X U r-+ O 41 AJ 2) 3 A a (d W U C L .U ~ N ,C. w o f4 N N O 3 O r-i N O O a1 N H .4) ri 4j U n N H U U U A U N N a) A U) ;j •LS ~ -,A Im 0 (d -4 10 04) N d O L) H 4 ~ W H 4 A E 4j -r4 4-) 0 3 rr~l m •14 •ri U 4 a o 4J C N 0 4 a) ,C X H H •>1 U N 1J N AN of cd O (D U C U ?4 a Id a) a) H 44 H ri 3 S4 U >4 •H (d a -A C A ro U o •ri (d O N ;j (d 44 W ,j ° a) o a) w Id ° v A V Ind u m O )-i L O N A '0 ro 14 m U 4) O a7 a) (d d) a) 2J E. a) N a C.• U L •ri U m O 4 N y) a) a) O U N N )i C 0 O N a) O O xi 10 ro A U b S4 ~ a) m N +d C U a) 0 .C• u U ro H C U N .C U `J G' .t. •rl N N 1) w 'O O a) 7t 3 ?I Id O o U u u) O) ri I G' 4-1 v H H ro 7 a la AJ w 'ti ro o X -H H ,C a) 4i •H o N H N C4 U N o N a C H E C Ci 10 s A o U °1 0 44 Id H •rl o o r4 O H U R a) Aj O G U •.i .Li W )4 a ~-1 N U -H 44 Si 7 (d o fn U U i a) N (d L 7 $ N R U C •ri a) •ri o a) a) ~d 3 0 H r w o o r-4 .C H ° m 3 z H N 2 G X u) to L .u C E j H r o O N a) L N O )1 (t) 7t C RS a) ~4 U a) O H ::j Id U N - •.i A o fd •rf ,G N rd a) .,i -A N H )4 C _H l4 L U a 27 'O N 3 E • 4 r H U Id O a) N 44 Q) •C Id N aNl N AJ G w > 44 ro U lc~ a) a) L (1) /d H a) a) o (d a) b 9 O C 1J 7 A C .C o to N C 10 a) H rd H C )01 •O CP ll L L G 3 u a) •C N N 9 X ~ -H 7r ° q Sr o X (N fd o o )v a) -H a) ri . H N )4 o E y a) o 3 C U '1 44 )4 (d N (d u 3 In 5 I" l4 o b N H •r M 3 N N H H 0 Is H H ,7 d U 7 U' U H rtS }J a~ a N Z 9 r-i r~ ri N a H 00 r 5 d 00 N O b N r-1 r) 3 N N rl '•i O a) H H 'J d 0 N U :j zu H Id 1J a a En z ~ a O 1 a~ 11 .U a) Id 0) a) ro H H b N n. w u Ci rd Id N 3 d 3 .HNi i w v N u a~ d ri u -4 .U N U) Q) Q) Q) 7 •Hi 0) O) H b N O ard C: u 0 ) O S4 M N b~ N Id u O N x rti U cL m H 1-i •--i O .X id rtS N E. M a L a) .a id O G to N G ~ ° a~i L N HNi - O li v xi u w to 3 > 3 Q) u ol 41 m 41 a Id a 3 L~ x a) rn xq 0 u n " Id A u U) m ~ ri U) 5 N Id N - bi .u u d S, 11 H) -.-I Id Rf t>t n. (a O H .c: H .,i Q) 03 a C m m Q) to m to 3 w G C d O )d 74 .U Q) m 1-1 0) .U J-i )i yy •HI N rn w v 3 m to .C A xto 'a a a at m yi m u O )a F ~ H ai -4 Id a) t1 O w q •H m W, FC W 3 " .u 3 0 a ai v 0 .C U O W a m A Id o s 4j .C 0, .u O O Li 0) FC u I O o N C U) to )-I 1) W r1 FF44 K. LG m .4 ri m Q) o Fd o A a o O JJ ° rd En ro a •5N W 3 m w w rn w O U v 44 v ol "Cy •N 41 o x W o o W 0 z 4j ro °i 0 0) O) A S~ 4! 0) R H O H H H -4 a N b ro H o O U) A E to to h m u 0) 0 q m H m 4 to 3 W U) to u) Q) 11 a) -A 41 ro o 'Ei -u LO) LO) O C b) x N •.HNi fi Al N °i N O H >4 J., U N 1 Id I W r-1 R) 10 w a) n. A -Hi y to H N C w Au •o ro a a) a u v -4 A A N IHd$ Id L ?I p m :j 0 ° z C w S4 0 Id a U 5 ro z - O O w H 0 0Y Q) 1-1 3 •r) W U O 04 0 PI .Ci ri N Nf L(i b m of .-i H Hi .i .i H Hi Hi H .i N N N N N N N .UC Q) N w -HNi ri w A S°i xri Hi to w )i 0 O rtF F4 C 0 w i m a~ o d zqqi ro x ° Q) w 16 0 V 0) z) y v 1) U) H H H 3 N 7 J) m O 1i o A G x zs a 3 0) •n -H) ni OS 0) 1.) 1) 13 0) m C J-) 44 .C O 14 x •ri > to 0) 14 .C C7 id Hi O m O L 0 N H ~ O) 0) 11 to Q} >t b id m U U > u y 3 m -t; - 1.) 'tf m Sa E+ W O} Q) -H 01 N 1i 0) 7, R .4' U :j 0O " -.i a) U) Q) O -rf •-i 41 e , v 41 HOi ° 0 r• " t°a H N to ~ to -A U) o ro a a 43 u 0 L m N A H N 0 •S 3 .3 o F U r-i 10 Q) ?I H 9 to Im O •HI ri u r-i m m Q) 41 }i H L -i.) ,C aI S w •.i ri w v 41 o 1 H -H ro N '0 0` a 3 v k C Q) ,C ro 0 Q) x > 0) 0 14 to H •Ht )d O .C o ,C 11 .-i m 3 fd ro 3 o •Hi Q) C 0) o, x N U x 44 ° N 0 3 K tr C roaPa w 41i '3 L ro b ~ C 3 ri W 0 7-. 0) N O H H :3 v 0 0.' N x w w 0) P, u L N U > ~ 3 3 M P. ~ u o ~ o qrnq ri .0 ~ m rt -ri v 0 0 N b a) (z~ v x W F v v v a) Q1 )d -n ,C 4L 0 C. -H) •HI 0 W O a 'O v M 10 U a) 0.' QI N G' ° O •Hi O q C A O -H, O to b N G y d 04 o w H 3 - w .u N w -4 v v 0) -.i Id Hi a m cn 'ci W m 4t: o q Hi aW N L aW F+ q .sv" O i U -.i H 0 w ul N rn w a w m ° U' rn G u o u 3 -rrl n (O •,1 '0 F iJ C F > 7 F ••i A F N -Hi v C O y N -HI 3 10 C v w Hi m ,C -HI o N N u P4 g -H ~ rH~ 0 > c u 3d sroi q u -Ci o -,q 10 a 0) '0 A 3 a x ° W 2 L wa) C ~q o N Q) C v to F v Cu y f~zC q H-i O cd N f~ H •Hm+ m v 3 L C w ° a O v li L P, a) ll C ro u 3 v ro x U C v m >4 w )d -.i 0) u to E. v v N v o -Hi m ro O O v 0 a m (d L L H1 -Hi m a) )i w x 3 N m c S, v m •Hi ro v u s+ m -H1 a) Q) M >a y -Hi c o -HI x N m ro )4 14 c c o w m c H m L L 71 a O ro U L L w -C Q) F n n a vi ~ r m m ~ rv v ~ m r m m o .-I r rn c vi .-1 rl N N N N H .i 1 rl ry N rt N Cl Hi D OD ii O 'd M ~ ~ N N Hi e-1 O N) H U) U) d) H 0 N z U H Id L aN~ mz 0 x.14 u) 4J H Ol as OD O 0) Oro N .-i \ •HI M 1 \ N N H o :a H U) • H 7 0 N z t' H Id 1J a ul a m z m - O 41- H D U u O` m ,d a 3 U m 11 G O m N U u (u •rl y, 1-1 1-4 m rt ,C U G O b1 G ri x )1 J CS 41 W o 5 O )1 a m d) 4 11 •C o C N C m m N v J., U ) ~ o O R )i a m ri . .U ) G S4 a a m 11 (1) F. L •ri m d) O E G W O o -.i U d) m U m 4 U N 3 U sil m u m a N v > 0 n C O •ri rid G U 14 u U U u 11 in rl Q U C U 0 o to m ~ CC U U •ri m m 3 d) ro l U a) W S4 ro ri G O 3 Si d ) m q O Id rti NN ro x m R d) A 11 N U i to m d) u SOi m m ri R O U G -r♦ L C a U) -ri U m li m m m ° R >y ri C O m ,G 11 m N N O 2J vi o m O to u N G O ri m m •ri •-i N nG) q Q o C O -r! m m + 0 U H N u N Ol X m o U U G m 3 H -1H m N U m m b G •r1 w m N m U L d) .U 0 a) 'J H q m H i •rl L G m -,1 ra m U C R7 N ro U) m L W O N m m H v m 0 ,G 1J W O Y1 td d N b y i U U w Si ii 0 N ' tU N S C) a) rn 3 H - N N ri N O aS H EEn d) d `Ey' a m C ri R Ot -H G •ri 3 to -r1 m m N 411 ,i 3 'O m a m b1 C 10-1 m H d) g O7 la O C E, m m m m U O E. 3 O u Si 1 01 d) N Si O ' 'd ro m m U m ri u D a O U (d X 0 I•• w O Q .G 0 .4 U d) 11 O ~ AA r U m J. U b) ri m U y4 _ 0 N u H m .Y rrdd a v 11 m i u OI d) u O U U) 'r1 •rr m 9 u d) .G U ) U m 10 •.q o m r U C W W X u m A ) E! U N .-1 m W O S4 d) q ) ,Q 1.1 w U :j 10 N u .o G d b1 G ri sC u Id a d) 1'G) th U 0) C v r+ S4 m p a w O - 0 G tm G •,C-I Id (0 id •14 p m d) F m G .O 11 m -1 U f ~ ::I o m dl U m U m 11 m ,G U d) uo 4 to G ri x k m a N ,5.,' U ~ ¢d m `d ri •rr ~ U W o G U •ri 11 U N m 11 m G L C `[s N O u R m 11 (d 10 U Rd O Ind H R 6 U ou z d) 0 Q, o -1 (1) D N rd W O 1.1 .,-1 m4' m -Gi ; i d) a O w d) u d) 4 U }1 1-1 a 14 ,q 41 C -r{ O to i U U O U m 4 L (1) N U { u m p 0 .G 11 to •14 v I-i H -ri N w O N to w 1~ RC E ' H x U G O 411 in 0 N G O ,~1 ~ 3 m ~ U r 41 . 0 a w z o fn M H ~Hy ? U C O U u ~ N .G E 1 N 93 m i - 11 ~ P L m 0 N U J.1 1.1 id U u ~ 11 m N S4 ~ 41 G G 0 A C .L m W to th m :3 N }i ~ 13 O) O Oa :3 m N W H ) •J O ~ u N Q 11 -0 bl C 0 b) 11 w to z 0 E- Ln + C9 ri Cf1 . 0 ft a~ y H .i N r!1 •tl' Vf b r t o O, O .-1 .i N e-1 ri H .i .-I rl N N N N N N U U ~ m to v m m )i )i ri d) 1 m Si C -rl 'O 21 (1) N tr X A o m •ri m O w N d d) U m U C L m m m a) H 14 Si X 'y m ,4-• O G •A •r1 •r1 .G tm m d) O O O U U O U a to m 11 m 11 X G 3 O ri 11 m U N m G G u 44 m U tm o ,-1 r4 tm O N N S • 4 N 44 J.1 d) m C +i U m L dl C 11 m .C y m L m N U A ri 11 Id .u U b -ri U 11 11 d N oE m m 11 w m x m .C m •ri o x u t7) a m w m .G w o a 0 }i H U u N N U N •rl (y' N 11 m H Id C •r1 ,G 41 m p -1i U N O 11 }i m 20 Id -4 Qi U a r1 N W U ri 8 a m O .I U O C 4 u A •r1 tn -.a m m u 5, G Q O N -4 R. A m to i m 3 11 0 ri x o m w d) E i1 Q o N 441 0 E G 4 •o m -B 43 la ~q" m t n a '~u F a 41 > 1 R, w .,4 11 U N U m x H m d1) W d) 3A1 O) O d) U Id U .G P A O ¢3 G G m 13 N F mi m N b a •,i d) W Ind W " ri 'U X •mi @) W QI tp t1 N m }i .G G 11 m o dl u X M U U ~ C m m (d O d) 11 O m `J u r: F'. m d) to rl m m to N to m ,G •ri A O R O N a O 9 ro G m U m ,C C U bl U 41 -11 •rl U m N -,i d, •ri •rl ri Id N G rd w 11 N q N br !i H X A 0 ri u m }4 m A U g O C U I bl P4 U Si to O ,G •ri •ri U N Id O. (d •1i 14 G p, m d) m N O N y ri d) U -r1 L G U ri 10 a 1-1 U W a U C d) 14 m i W O )x-1 C X U C -ri T+ a )1 U a a d) u m m ri u u tll v 0) ul m H m o a a d) m a x o m [ G o1 G R m m m G )4 a G •r1 m d) •r• u O d) d) U m W m r1 d) Id d) •rl ,5 U 11 O m m 3.1 •ri a; N 3 O m ,C,• a > Q) U d) to R d) N 3 Q A G N u 0 .C rd L 0" W44)4 :DU L N •ri m H o U 3 G v l4 tm 1 a) C H W ~ d) m a m O U U) U G .1 N O L ~ O U •R U m .,i 11 u O G m U x U N o m Q L M G }-m S1 U O •ri •ri 14 m m G m r`• 'Z., U .i O p N .i .G m q m TO •G bi •.i N U RaC N N W -,4 10 ro In F ro u H a E m m u a x H ro N G U H m m N m U U 10 m co G b) r• W C aQ l-1 m C Q) a O m U o O A u o u ro rn 0) O m E. v „ m o u Ib m m -r1 ,C; -rl w G U H m `b u m RS r-I (V5 m U O )i N -,1 m 7 Cn ~ al w ~ a) m IV U 1-{ x U U N .-1 a U U U N U) N E m r1 Si m m u -r! 2 O ).1 b m f-i i0i L 4 ' u0i q um a u o •r A -0 Q1 R, y 3 rf m w ui r m m 0 1 N w r o a n w yr m CO H 0 d 0 0 N r-i ~ •ri rn ~ N \ N N ri ri H ~ En W E~ U z" H (d a U) U) 2 N o ~ H ri Iq at 0 m id A m O O .,i 1 :J U - H 1a u ~ a) Ck m C U al Id A) v u i t1 C rl m Id L C) a) o H WO ro X L ul n H 14 ri a Q - O W W o N w H C.J 4 Id U a) a m 0 •'i W v D i) r: N t aa)) y Id 3 b) a ID ro 3 0 Si 3 N a) u 41 N U -rHi U ri Id •,i aui m O •rl w u a) o N RS m u U O -4 )X+ rtf G4 L id U m r-i -A m H q 4 O to CD U w N a (d a) v O D L •.i Ri V aI G O ul 9 U N Jyy-~~1 a3 U .U o E N 0 O l rt U w O ~4 a) b o •H m ..mi m N ~ N N L W 1 b) ~ -1 a) rd S~ i C.' -4 ul a) m U G U U O v H a) ro L 3 ~ rtf TS -i :j O L) 3 N U G m v 14 m N N ~ O H O 'h ~ -rI rd y1 aHf - 4 $ d Q H S N DI U D y J a) m u N Oi q U y 5, N u a) CU N 10 S o) ar 4j 44 U k a u o w C bt G•. .ri m :j U) i as j O y' to rd to w a o m 4 UO H o O Cw $ 1~1 Q. O p .4 Y1 T) ~ G rl b H a) y a1 L m v d P4 m ~ •m o 4 L k yr E i U •.i ~ N A 1) C. N U) a) m ul W G X (o P1 +1 a a m -4 s1 b 4) u .n q 3 O- 4 U N b N IV O .41 JJ 01 H d) 'o oo W ro •.-1 b O w bi a) El F .u m o ~ C p 9 A ~ O -A y) fa H :j U aS U H ! -rUI H !J riO A 41 r3 U) a) 4N b1 0 i 1X4 RI ~ O b rU-I U b H .sZ y4 a) " m -rl vi H H a U 3 x x .U $ 41 i m C U 4J L .,U~ a Up N w m a) m 4 b) r N W a) 4 L r x a 3 ~ U p ~ S. N W tDa W 4J a) W ro U ~.1 O ri a3 0 D K.' m •a U I ,C E m .G H N N g N -ri 6 a) b) z ,1 rd 0, a) u H O m G 1i 1-1 14 rd U 0) -r0 H m a) N a) C4 a) ro -r'i a M O L 'J 0 N O to E N L 41 S 0 1-4 O En V ~14 ~ u Jam-) N G' o 41 td y . q to U U ~ a `Cy ,-:3-1 G H S, 1-4 7 0 N 3 ~ r1 N M a/ N to t~ W O \ O r-1 .i N e•/ M r! V~ `-i 1I1 N ~O .i .-i m .-i N ri O N .-1 N N N M N V~ N m N b1 N 0 U) H mi > P. a W m a3 .1. m u HOi 5 N b Q)) 41 N 0 3 S ~ Qi .o a) qq 8 y aa)) 41 r-4 3 > R C~ U N n3 uC rt q D m. Ln "i m D +i Of id O ro N W G H m a) m u C b1 3 - ii m Vii IUa > r ii ~ o m 7 14 -4 w ~w 14 44 44 -H ~j 4-3 9 k -H rd o a) ri 1}a~ G al v H m y a ri b R 3 3 N r)d G Ai H i (d u a) y u A ;j :J m W A H i) O J.) to 1 41 CL m « i p 1 U y QS O H O O ul .1 3 ~ w rt S H m O s x) u 7 w v a 4.1 m S m ro W G -rUi w w 4 3 w 0 w o w .0) a) aGi u v ~ v s o u " 3 4J1 H H H F., Oq U) U, O ll 'Zy v A p w o 1-i b ~ 0 3 x q a1 m H U o a U ai m •.G•i m ~ H n O m ..-1 ' y"[j 'N .G d E m A N ti H -H to O A I N N U o ~d + x C D G 3 A o m G o N U of i S m rn E ro 3 o x W v m o H u m rt to 1 0) 'o i a A a u a S •Gi Du ro N 7 x `jm " k :1 :J 9) 0 ::s H r; o ro v m G 7, r-i u L a) p 11 C -r G Q) 5 N N p L q ri al U rt G a) •O .u N 11 in >t N F ?i H 30.1 O r-i C m > y D ro 'O rt v 3 y N u N id N y o a m v oap, G w S r > Sqz w W a ~ N o m G m C Q) C H [ r b 7, E o 3 u N m m H 7 x o (Doo O 73 Id 3 't7 3 O U) L G X L y C Q) O H H O L 1J N b L bi U O EN Q) - O 0 b ~ m (0 a) CO IlS li - -H a) G 7 O U P, .r A L a 7 H a ll b~ a) ri ri N to b H O x: N )A U O U 14 a 10 U b -.i 0 a) o m S v C m v a v v aJ D w G w 3 a) N u N cq U b ?Oi N L W L L w H rv M ? V) ~O l~ m m ^V rl .-i .-i H .-i .i w 'i Orv N ri f•) r 1 rl a) O aa)i 0 23 N ri \ -H r•i \ N N r-i O Is H U > z~ H (d L W Q U) dU' CH•i °a H r-1 a) A co H °91 N 1 m i \ N N -i r♦ o as H W U U' U H (d o) w U) z °a~ ro rn )4 N 7r 1~ N W N v N r-1 :j •C N 'd O •4 A A 04 ra J U N d U F 0 ro w m O m -ri O m W 1i v a) U C . o `U 'd .-I C o H o 44 a v, -4 xi N C 3 d U 3 N W t~ N U U m a) O O di Ln v rd 4 to M > .11 1-1 ro ro u o p G O O v id m N 9 O a) Id N U) v M1f C N V v F 4 d Itl L N U .C U b .4 .4 3 v) : N M N - N L N -ri N ri 1-1 0 0) H C: lu 10 y u > u (L) v u EI Q) a) o ) 7 ).I a) d) H (d N ~4 4 m ro Ch -H Oe 4 a 4 v a) ro m 3 x v c 4 ro 11 u id N 41 A .4 m 0) Ci N a) Id O ;J ~j 0 - 4J L O .4 14 •11 U) .U m L 0 M N a) ) 11 U 9 $ ~ t) F N F (d u U ,4 N 44 •O 4J a) a) •H C a) m 4 v b 'O •rl (d m v m in .-i O •ri i-~ 41 t`• -rl N N A U (1) 14 41 W £ ro G m 4 a 4 0) 0 m : 3 O H (d 0) 4 u 4 x o r _H 41 a, ro JJ o a li W v u u 4 •.-I a N 41 si 14 4 a H N ri ~4 C a) 4 O O iJ iJ O ttaa77 Wyi b, t) W L H 0 0 2: 44 (1) C~. n U ro z 0i r m N O rx r li r-I O A O N -4 •H at -H •a 4 bt L m 7, W m (+W~]] d A 41 d 4 H 4) W N Id d o -H •H W~77 H rtt -4 ,C 7-, W 2 :y Q F to E .u z •4 a q A 3 z u )d m 1J N F En A a) •J, E. m 41 •H to 4J A F ~ a) 9) Cl) C8 a) U) 14 U) m U) R: H` .U r4 >4 a) -'i ro to L -•i H '0 U) m a) O O t(d-".' d{ CUa' Na U d O Lq 11 `G' A 0O ~O ° a) a) S4 U U U .u lr1 .o H ro t b U 3 w I Id u .C u 0 L o 0 .,A 0) 4 ul U) 04 Ln 4 to -4 4J to 4J .u O N 07 t3) S4 ..-I a) 2 -.i 9 Id tm 41 L (d C3 .i N O of A 1) ri U 9) C CL di U) li .,4 1 -4 ED to 4) (d :j 41 4) p 0 4.J 10 Q4j O W Id ~ a oU to id 44 0 ~ L r, N P, y N H1 ~ U1 tO r m m o N (•1 V ~ tD r m 01 o ri N m W In bt O $ O 4 m -.•I 41 -H r- O )4 p U ro O d) q' R1 a L m d) o 44 (d o 44 roqq qq u Ca CL o ~ 0) 4) a) O •m 25 A X Id )d ro 3 .,i 4 n• }4 -C'.. m m C U O 0) U Ci m -4 'h O to & - m m Id N to N E+ ,4 x •.i Id 11 ri a) U C r O ro A m id 4 H 4J n U e) i .a A a3 0 b 3 u w ro C u 14 ro i) O )-I Cl O m m m U .4 H a) O .i U 9) m N 11 ro N U d) -c.• L L O U +i x S4 1J )4 rt C 3 w 41 Id ri df C u o U 1) (d o a a) N m rd X. R 11 ro m }4 V ',7 A 44 gg O ,4 U 5, 4 4 C •ri t) a) 9) 9) d( A 4.) N a) f i u di .i ri L O K N 4 aj ;n A ii m .4 •.i U •H C N O N .u U u o N L E u r as a0 p o •.i N ,n ro o O O li N O •.i U •.i 1-I d m 17 O M 93 l4 " N 4) 41 ro •d •NI ?4 44 11 Eo ,C o v C C 3 u v b, v m a) > m d) cn o d > U i ri m q rt b) ,A R U [1 •4gi N 3 3 x 0 x -O u S•' rzd m td b, a) N •.i u U a -ri k (d 1J dS a 41 v o U u u V ai (d ,4 •ri -1 U v d1 N a) CU L )4 H H .4 d) > 'C. F y m d5 ,1 a) O y 3 ro d N A a O N ° 3 )4 > m > L fd O JJ a) L O Qi W a) (d q > N 4jN U N W m w N )i .4 O d O ri d) ~4 O ro -4 u o rd a z W Z -,A 1-, ,C A rod o ) CL n u a 9 (d iinn H in H 4) C: 0 U) 4 m g F ro U) L tJ N a) N 'rte -•-i O - ?4 U) U) L O a) C > A (d U C L O H P) H ro C S+ W N O m 4 u U ro d• 3 l4 i4 1 d) 00 . 4 : N a iJ co (1) df a) U U U U ro ro a) Rp!:i C 4 rt a) > 4 4 A u r N a) -4 ~ N O O N O O ri 3 O (d 7( 4 )i )i .rl bl ro ~j C~y Si •fi b 44 U U O U a) to m Id a) (U m 14 to m ..i S4 C N m > a) 14 L m O G N m N > ~r rd S4 s, -H U .sC o u a) 44 a N 44 a) N 1J }4 ri F4 U C a) l4 O N O a) Q, w .4 L O Y N ,-i .H C O .C: O ,d s4 u y, m o E+ U) u a3 a (d u u u 414 -1 N r~ Vvt ~ ~ m m O N M d~ ~ tp W O .i N W u) ~I ti --1 N .-i N .1 ri N M N N N N N N d 00 ~4 O Q1 (N N r-1 ~ •H M ri ~ N N H H ~ U z " H nt w `n U) ua UJ d) Q'. 00 ~4 o b N ri -.•i M 3 H C'j 4 N .-i H -a cn E U )4 z ad 0 w `n U) z o~ V) O # H Ln ,H h m v C rn v ro N u x 41 4 H 'U N X .sO" .OC L N d~it ,C V) 10 R W A x o a ro y " ~ x 41 U :j a) 44 N -L1 U (d N U °i .rC.i ..v.~ Oa 7 bt .d ° b U C 3 v C u 11 w rN-1 U N >I N N N O 4J Id •.i r ri 3 Id 3 1014 w 3 a z y •4JJ- O C li -rli . dd O a~ N o v w a v O U U -.°-i O m O U L 0 7 U ?a 0 J ,.'Od i ~ •ri 1-4 O X O O ri a! 41 R m w N N to U O U -4 41 :3 H NN ~ U .a N .a H rtf C31 O -.H-1 Id w - U ro O rt - 'd n o d a Ca '4 w N u 11 U U > N ri y fa) W w 3 O 14 N S, to a u H F N L N H m m .U ° U u .Ci lOi of b p A w 9 a -~0i o . F v ~4 N IJJ H W N ~j -4 S O ° w H 0 a d C1 m N ~ ~ m y N t° H 0 2! L V 0 4J 1-1 P u N •a ~ C X R iy N u N .b 8 N (1) 0 H iJ N .i L p: Rr 4 0 ~4 L bl N •.-t N TS 'T~ Id L 'd a m l+ •.i O 1.1 O 11 L L O7 101 O A N `<i >e N N l.i N X: U) FC C Ci U H r-i 1) •a 14 N u N - µ.i :j 3 N w ~ 43 -~1 wa u s4 .0 ~ •t~i to .sC O N1 y, y Srt~f y~.~! C .C a w ro 3 RC in N rJ 41 A o 11 3 b C F F N v N q " C a o li ld u i O X to cn r-i H N to 1.1 bi C 3 N 14 r-i C w ri rtS u ° n rxE r O O H N id cy~ O O r ip m i36 3 u N U to m v 'u uWv1 •0 O 4J O U o A ~-4i S, O U20 w •1111 N QI N V 9 R `4 10 ll H x q x f Id Id 7 o Xa N o w to ; 7 r5'i W N ,.I to H O U d P4 ~4 14 li U2 O y O (L) C (d v N R g w -.9i 1J Yi id 11 N L EF) N 0 41 X 0 U N R IN N ° -4 0 '-m1 C Ai o R7 -4 Y 2 1 W Ph~4 41 i H U (]I 2f N >w ~ N .-I N r1 w m m r m m o H N ro a In m r m a o H N a N H H N ei ~-i ~-1 H N N N N N N N m CO 11 o dl 0 25 N r-i m -ri a ~ N r-i O 31 H U) U) (D m u N 2 U H id n a o z otw 13 H 1 .a U N U y N X @ .~C m N r1 N 0 Lj N rI N U 0 N 4 U Id U ri C C N l.s •rl 44 R v ro X. u N 0 > v w w S[7 }a F r~i uvi H a '0 r-1-1 v ~ ° N o x l N v s rn L °o i s♦ 9 0) H ro A R 1i+ i u 4J li 41 0 03 13 O uuli r [ v 9 m 4 3 1 x v N 10 3 A d b o N Jj i-i H lj Si Id ' v UUII ~ o r-I N o 1d 0 ° w ,q id w H 33q G ~i P. H H o N A P. u v H H -H :J -4 v 3 .H RR~~ +v .a u x -4 h o .u u w w uror o o v E+ a N. .H 3 w X b~y 41 " O Id 44 ~ .u ~ Ian X ul 1i 1-1 v Id rt 3 N u N o L 1.1 N .U ° U d-3 •rl 0 A li N F. .l U .d O+ N .u 0 0 ul m w d }A E+ a U O N 'b b O r1 X b a y 41 7 O N •a ro o w Id R v ro rn ° u N Ww O ,d U) a) 0 Ij 41 F w A N U ~ A ° " N -'1 N H u O 1-1 U) o 4 0 o N A +o 1 -H P 01 rt „ N v u N w 0) Q) x -rl o -,I v o lJ r.C W m W b w tm i.9 ,--I H 3 11 1J u L v w •yi F, a 'O Q O w O .H O N N ° C 0 qq O O O C O O N H U) p m N RC o rT -oi 0 r4l -H m ✓T O b P, Ai ~ U w m O ro a) N •a 3 m N C ,-i w H N 1-I 3 b N li rn o o N X A v -G .11 ~y 3 z C 3 0 0 ro r y m "i u o U 0 00 L N C v .C 0 E~ C v li u li 41 0 rt x 0 3 F N -ri w 3 H N ro ~ u W rn li o m zs d N ro a ° 3 n L v N C C ,G ,C 3 7 N G N vNi C b -H N w L y 'Q li a b U N JJ CP a C NQi .0a 3 u ° u m o N m 0 0) O 0 K N a A a v° m ro rn ~ -i N rat v'i H N .a H .-f .-1 .i N .--I rl 1 N N h N W H av N 1 m rq N N r-i o a]1 H U, in a; H 4 0 m 0 U ro y Ci a U) U] z ski C, a U) ° H H w b) 11 L •riff G L 'LJ .0 u 0 (d 16 L U") A m 11 a a , C 4 m 3 ~ - G o o ~ o o w o w w w w > >J 3 G to U A 1 N G w w r H O O w G N G O O O L 3 7k U ~4 Id to > O u A u 41 4 0 41 N L O U rt H 11 U) .u o w Id w w w 3 0 •.a 7 14 w C' L •rt 14 w > r. 3 ai o OU) 1 L 0) x w o w L ro ro u x G G a w a -H w (d w 'r3 4 0 41 U H L )i U ri ro ~ O) N O~ $ O N 2i rI w 14 0 N U y )a w X m O w L ri ro G Id G 7 .O + b 7 O d) 3 'd R 0 o G '1 0 3 0 'd w 14 o a u 0 U w •ri w o >i q}q rn u u :j 3 a w 0 H w 5 u a 0 H (D .14 rd rl 0 41 10 Id 11 m m w a a, H L w O w H L H a b .a N O O X 0 44 ro u U U O H p w w O •ri W W U Id fie} O WW z~Wi W W G W !zw~ ul U) En d) 0 3 O fi4 ,-4 -i 3 ri r. O m -,Oi w p O O O 41 L L •ri O Cf, G ;4 G w t4 W L4 w P4 T! W PS Id -k 3 G o W O U) o W m u U) WW N W u) W CC W w .a .G U 2 •.i WW •a Z wNy aW z W 2 w z Id r4zp m 41 41 t) Id ro .<r• G OH O O 0 b' •.i HO O FC OH H 0 rd O R7 3 to w N 5 H i3 m N rn H U) H W u F W A A t0 W Id b u, m m m m Id U 1i U H~r~+ RS pi H H w tY. H W H 04 k Ai H w O is 6) t) 2q) E R1 H )a N m H H H " W H -H m m 4j .,A 0000 to w u 3 U + U U° U °u 0 w n 41 Id o m Zi to N b) C rd 4) m L Ci m Id Id O O •ri w X G A U -rI id m m m u A )a w U > 3 >i N w w ri H N 3 0 ri L 3 a 3 N N m ~ to b m m H N W VI t` O N N d M H H H H .-I N r♦ H ri N N N N N N N ro b) 4 (mod w 'd C N N .4 }wj " y) d) c O r-I-I N X 41 N Id w W N 4 CA ni m H m G w w O b) rd a N - 7 d) m C •.•i N )J H V k >1 C 1) 4J zs i m w Q' .~q H ~4 w at b H 4-) o k x ~ w 1 b w -H rd ►mi tai w 3 rt .C rH-I H Eeo to i) .G G of m „ 0) 0.t 0 a U Cil •ri J.) >I t-i m !-1 RI •ri i;A N to L U) ri w w O O w (r• G w m 0 d) w G a t b G a G 4 d) 1) tp ri .ri u Id -r1 o H w ~ O a fy' D m b) O) r-i N X m id 0 N ,0 L u 1 r v C A ro Id )-i : a m ) u H b) w \ ri w o Id w ri d A m u ri O o to o G > ,n N 4 11 -14J a w 4a) 41 rt Sa ~ •r+ N 11 m G Id G tM to 11 14 1) R7 rd G rt -ri U ro w G w w . 11 r. 0 x14 'o a 11 > 3 m A > 4 > G " o L o E Id 11 ro 14 -4 ro w o u C -4 O w a 0 r. 0 L N .u rc: m H > Aj U rtS A N -m N N •~i L M .G b) G U) !J N L) O 7q, a .C m > 3 o G 13 G 1J o w Id 3 (d u to N N 3 r+ H A o A w u A 11 [ G w w o u C X G 41 .-a w U U) >J ~ ~ •rI A > o > •a .X 14 •ri m a •n •.i ro L ro U O O w U O G m Id d 3 C +j ri im u O u 1 + 3 r-t w a w X w 'O A u G k li .u U rH 11 11 w X m (d L •rf L V) L O w O w U w w -ri m w O m - O b) r w U S w 3 N A w G m w u a i w w G w W w t u 3 0 14 w ro JJ i rt a 14 u r x H > i :j H w o w 3 a a 1 w (d o a w o L O 11 m >I w A R L to (1) t) 4 •n M A > W m } Li ri U w U G L b -4 cn L N u U) G w G w > 1 ) to m y o w aW q 3 rg 4J m (d 4) N H (1) 13 (d t)q r-i b) •ri -4 m .G U L .U U) Id m w U X ~4 O w L G a G U ri C u •.i m 11 -r H E a x r, 44 o is w A v 'i C w a b IUd 3 . u u 3 o a) X - x o u w o u m w 11 O W m > U U) O m w L m H 10 ~4 (d v w w 10 1 0 w ro 4 5 m a ro ~ .14 o u O' a d) ~ p, G Q 0 7 li 0 m ~ U) to m rtS U bl U w fd w O r-I F N O w G m r L rd O O 'U (d u Id 'd -14 A ro -H L C 1r O b s:: G 14 m A-1 .u u G X i-7 w w y a 0 H O U) O N N .t~ U O w H L fd (n ,L" 7 G w m a~ to .C U L H L O L '0 1A ll U C4 G m m a tT ~ JJ C ra .!4 >a o u u A m -rI m w w a} G rd u m a od 3 101 3 u w L 10 G ro J. li m r( N K1 d' N b t` m Or O fi N N d~ to O H CI r~ to 'i .-1 .i .i rl N r! .1 !1 H N N N N N N 0 N w 00 ~4 o ~ N H rn g H \ N N e-i r♦ O Is H n N 0 N 2 U H ~ U) U) z aL O ~ oLi .Li H N C> is ora N r-) ~•a r-i ` N rv~ .a o .a H u Z U H QS L a 0 Z 0 a..- i u ri U) o~ L Ol ri H N -H 3 O V! -4 O 4 N N N L (1) -rl N ,o U N H W H v H U U O N H 0) a) U 3 'o 1-1 A .4 O --H{ H 1-i O Ei f-, U L •H (d L J-) aRi 0 41 N a) o 0 w L b -3 N 41 3 k' to N N O A n 'a .C O O N O )A.) •r44 O a 0 L rd -H L U O Q! U U) O 0 L d) L N a) H L f." H O U) o) L e v A H a @ rn v o m x o L L y o a L L to tT 0 3 d C A A U) to ro U) -H 0) (n m H r L En 0) Y1 b1 0 •n a N N .4 .Y •H id a) .C L -rl 0) U N to U) -H -H 0 'O 0) L .-i -z H L id w ro 4 (n C A H u (da) L R C 00.0 m i v x L A a) ta 3 v -H > 3 0 ~j 'd O O ai m x z w id L m d ; O (d 3 o a) ro G` L a) 3 tn H x H ?i .s+ 'CU H N a 1-4 u ~ A d U o o 'HO H p 4 N (d O m o L O (d H of u n• L -4 r4 L 3 $ H 44 X O 0 U a) a O O _ W H 41 N L p 3 U fd 0 a 0) 0 U U H W 0 .4 > 0) X fd t H > H rd H v a) A O id o q w U U 0) .4 L .C O U 10-2 O U) U .4 - 3 O a) L W 0) ai A u w m H L O Jo p H a 4 G d P Z O m H a a) N III t+. U) O O 0 p H a) W >t N H O C: L U O a O -H L W al W - :1 N .f} L 4j ai U C' W 7 r4 W N Di to 4 O W L , O ro C rd x (d w to ) w oa z > wI o -H 2 fd a) A H tn i m L z w 3 •H Ul o A A H •H L o a) QI O O p O m N U) H L L (d $ O) U) to A 4 H .-i H H Ei (a -H U) 4 H 0 v - N Ul p H to H O U) ro F, O O •H ro fn U) O U1 U Ui 'd p: H r-i O 0) 44 ,4 1) H •H H GG 44 H C' H H O ~y H •H H .4 of O H H 4 9 0 ~ O O U 2i 4 7 W L N d) L:. O ',af E 9 9 >1 U o L A w 4 H 3 L O o O o > y, U 1 a) w a) L -H U U U i U A H a) O t o O Ei •H L H t) a) .U (a H ri Id •H L n• U) L 10 ~4 4J Id 14 d) R L o 0 3 LN o b( N A 41 0 0 41 .54 (1) fd 41 n• H U L H (d H (a G R H a L H 4 O) Es cd •H N ri at (D a) -ri 10 a O w A o O ,4 u C .C o .4 0 0 0 W O L C L L U L (a L u L u ?i a N ("i sN H N t•1 to b [D O~ O H N Mi N b r m Q~ N N N H H H H H H H H H H N N N N N 10 10 15 "1 0 O a) -1 H U a) W H a) ,4 .4 L ri N 0) 4 (d O 1 H 4-1 N 0) H U 11 Id 1-4 , H ,4 3 u 2C) d fd 4 . 4 (d S~ o H L ( Id 3 L L U) H 44 44 RS id ~qq o H m Ul ,U X .C L O O •ri EE 0 N o '4Jm ) a) L 0, fd H A 4 N w o 6 N A ~ w 0 w N o .4 4 N a 3 of to L H Id H V A .C a L •H rd a 4 0) w N O A L ro 11 N Q7 L N ri a) O) L a) y L O (D ro L 4 to L O 0 p (d -H O N D (d >4 0i td ul q O U a) O O H X k k 0) W a) t fu 9i (d a O a U O N of a) U) .-f C a) x a) a) -H N 44 0) W r bl F. r-i id J-) ,G o b b -H H a) X 4 o O (1) U o H W U H H O a) 'O N @ to ,4 0) L x (d -H H (D 0) H 14 4 41 ,4 U 4 H N H 40 7 L O SO a q AH O 93 H O J-) 1 L ~ 4 0) 0 W 10 (D H N N rd W rij ((a o U) 0, R Jam-) U) a) a) 0 F, U) N U H O L 0 O -H a) L 1 C N 0) .C 16 U H 10 3 L N O V N U fd O O Q) H L U) u N .C o .C U 4 rn w 4 o O m L ~d x w u L ro H O 4 a w rt o ri J.) H (d O F-, N 'O 3 N O A H .4 W a) ro L 4-4 L -H ,C a) L O L 44 O 0 H o L o fd H L 3 rd U) 0) (d H U H 3 'd 0) a .4 a) o ,q H H w H H W ri W ro q cn L O H 1.) .(3 0 ro -H o V U2 :I 41 H r4 r L a) L H a) N ro b (d L m bl V) tr.~ H d H U Q) i O O 0 q d RJ H C H ~ O rd Q) A +0 O a O 0 X H 4 b) -rt a) 0 O W W W a A H F., -H O H 3 0 O o . H H O 1 H 0 0 O m U n W b a 7 (n U) b 10 3 X va w W W z O O bi a) N O L L ai X •O •H W .4 Z a o o m q m m 4 •H L ro N H C to .U o to H H G •H U a .4 -H H L r-1 N N o u) f✓: •H H F U) A •H w !n u to L 0) •ri y O a 3 -H H U U) U) L x H ::I(du 3 b) ro rn A o ,d a H rP. H N H F 4 N L 3 U LJ L Ul(noHZE x 0 7 A. A C u w H Q) WE L H fi r, U H 0 U U H 3 -H 4 ro (dL N L O >,U w u 0) 1-1 X N 'O -.i a K H -H O) C H H C N a) b N C ri H 'd 10 F. O m d it r-1 .C L N 0 a A (1) a) H r i H N a a E+ m a) H rd (o O (n H N C U L N H 0 O a N (0 ri H O IQ 1J -ri - 7, N L Ll b a H a) u m a) 4-i -I N Z) a) 0) O O O H a) a) U 1 .-i H R N (d L O( m m ai D> a 3 li o (d 3 w rd a U Q .i N ~i ~I' Vl b r W ~ O hi Vi O ri to •-1 .-I .-I r1 H N H H N .-1 N N N N N N N N N m ~4 o N ri \ -H .-i \ N N 14 H Ls Cl) H 0 N z~ H td .1 u) N oz E 0 Y 1,4 H tV W 4> OD P C) N r--i ~ -H ~ N N ri r-1 o .n H En al U N ~U H it) L N W N En 2 C7 r1 to 0 ~ H a N r, Q) U L y tll ll O N ° ro a i N rt ro qq G N u 0 (d l 41 U) W .q a) rd al at O 11 G J N rd •14 !J u 3 JJ S4 N N .q ,-t •f{ .r( r' a) 7 O O U) H U y1 { }J to X X: •H a) N O )-1 0 a1 q Al ~ 16 (d L 14 a) b) b1 N G C r. N rt1 O w ~w am C }1 1-1 w 14 ro 0 M o A O G H O 0 11 rt O td •.i a) ro a) q - -,4 U •a a) 41 -4 N .U ,G U o A N a) H O O O N G aj X 3 d N m v G H to t a w a) G h U to al U 7 G n. O > O H 41 4) W 0 to .14 o N b a) N cd H S4 C w r1 11 U A 1.1 fP U O O N > .o A m o a q C u o 1 N N 44.1 O QI U 11 11 3 .q 00 •m G U ro H ro X G N 41 N U - Es 11 yr N ro t1 N 11 N 'd G G a ) G J-1 O G •11 b H H a J O U4 1 -A 0 44 Id (d Ul 0 U .G w ~ 0) .G ,4 0 :j 14 ~4 U ~4 x a 1J L b a) ~ W H k .i L i1 U (d L :J O a U 0 d > U xi 'd .q w G ,q(D 4) 0 O zw N ,LOS 1.1 H S•{ a) 3 rd u N m 1d H H t1 l4 r 4 Z r-{ Rf rd rd -~i U :1 > q rd a) S{ 01 41 w •d a) O m r: ~4 U H >a L a )-t O U G G H Q 1.1 x t}1 a) N H y w m > 3 G o w a) o q - G -t C a > u a) q N O V o A rL 11 > 0 0 of { o 'o .u a) tat m •q U (d O ~ O Q U V N rd a G 11 0 ° G ro Yi .U w G o t1'i 11 U a) W q ai + 3 w 2i m { y qq o w q ° m R3 Z m w a t (1) 0 3 m w ri 3 z A o w 11 G rd w OH H D y rd -.•i 0 b) a) Q rd U ro 0 104 ~ (d 44 .,I m U to a o G s{ of H o C to m 'd m a) u G N -,•t (d U 1J a1 o m 0 3 m o H (n RS Sd H yqqt (d r. G x N 1d • 4 -r( H O O RS H UIP4j A H G w o b1 N 1, O rtf O 00 'o a .Gi ((d N O r1 m 1.1 •.i d U a) m w 11 a) G N bn N a) -.1 to O .u r-t rd w N ° N G{ i 14 41 •111 L ~ { 3 w Ln 11 O O a Id ro (d O b1 -H 1 ~ L O N N (tl td q O ,G O O o) N L U w G q a d w 3 N U F4 U d o) H .1 H N nl a N ti0 F m O1 O H N M Vr ilt b F m O ri N M [Y N 0 44 H .i H H rl ri H 'f N N N N N N N r-1 O 0 U) N a) 41 0 -4 ~4 -4 Fes'. 0 r° S.1 l4 ntA O x $ N 'o O ..U{ (D .W10 O •rt U v N ;j G ri (D O a) 41 111 x 1-1 S4 FI rn 3 G N o r-( > 41 a) to to p -H at w a~ 5 it O -H IJ 1W O •.i .c ,,GG` S' C Iq o s1 u U .iqoq m •.~1 F-t W O o w U 3 > w .u a) qq d ,d i J 1 " m ° (1) to C O O a) a) 0 a) H A .U rn L w ~f a) to G G 0 •d 41 Q tali O O -H - O G' .0 E O •.i b O td a-1 °u 0 w U 10 q Id sd G J N b) ~ ' 1 3 :j 4 4) ~O o u w N m G w G rn •r{ ..1 N tT O r-1 O O ::3 G N o > • 4 -4 G .G d $ (a 2.1 w rA o O G 41 1-U 1 ai m S{ 'U N a A rd •d a) rd N H i1 r1 r-1 to .O C N Z G N ,f-, .,.t •d x (d •G ro N O a1 w C a) i1 11 0 Li r-{ G U to W q (d 3 w t~ H a) a .--1 X C •.i ,i rf x O .0 (d a1 U f♦ 41 L O o ,G a u 3 a7 to q r •.1 N U ,q Q U 3 1) H 7 A. d w o rd id U tL 11 H N u 71 U rH-4 44 a U w N LW H O L a) O O a) f E A rd 1.1 41 1-4 V O T7 O m A w d w U a 0 N F N N H u m w m -4 w n N a) S{ O rd 0) S G L m w z w V4 Z G (D q tr )4 w In w a) U1 N O O O H a) G O r O 11 G ra O H S{ H al 0 . A ..i td a) w 1J (V 3 A H m H a) m !1 N > (d 11 a) a) b 14 H H S., .U N m r m (v a) a) 1{ (d a) r! s., p. a) i~ U r0~ H wl O H G a) L 4 A U A a) C N Pi N W x 0 Wo m 3 3 C a ~ N i.1 G i1 r' O U A U U U •H U N w a:3 0 Lo (d ) i N •ri O N O w O a1 a) H U 0 0{ m v 0 R N ° m ° w 3 y~" 'd U) w N q q U U v pp d b x O 2U N •q -,a 11 O U ,C q > q r 3 U G 7r q A t1 br O .1 rd O .1 O al N U ri Al y -H ro X •rl ro ri x r-I .G G t1 TS H 5 U ri td O u A )-t C1 }1 fo 1J O 0 O of ,C ,q O O a) b A) Q, (d a) 1i ~ .q ~ 3 3 L ~ m A 5 rt a s{ H m rv w rn ~ r m m r m o rv w v1 > 00 p O ro N r1 r1 $ H \ N N e-I .-4 o ~s H U) En Q) H > u°:3 C7 U H 1 a g mz ~ H U H of 41 H ai d u o Pd N -14 m 2z H \ N N .-1 a o .t) H ri) Q) H > O z" H Id 1-1 U) a U) 2 O U) o41= 5 H N M N ~4 m O oo 0 4 yJ 0 O A to ro 11 0 X 44 a) N ro 41 0 ~ N •ri 0 rd I -Gi u N o b, U) r-i 'i 41 (d 0 o mi r 41 p 'GU U u ~ id 'd 13 A rod 44 (d 0 ~o O A L 3 ~ m .ri v L 11 m 11 .G Al 0 )1 'd H -rt L ri L •'i v ro u •rl 4 iJ r 0 41 3. •'1 m G 41 0 .G H Id rd G A •rt $ a) 0 m w 11 -C 0 • G .G O tT O Al 0 44 )-I U 4 a 11 41 to • 4 u 'd G Z •.-I 44 'd o 44 -.i 41 o ri o -ri m G Id 0 H H (d 'd H 01 u .G U) 3 G ro 0 4a N H X 0 N H G O O m $ 0 •h -4 0) 0 a .U L O •ri H 41 .u 10 'd N A 0 !d Uu~td'+ ~Ud+ 2S id ri rd >1 li L O 34 }ta.7~7t bl ri t1 'ai ''d 4) a) rt1 Fes'. H i u id (d r 0 -t Ci ul p a a N m b) u R C4 o G 4 u '0 H G •i H ri u o id a) .G a ~ -ri N 'd o Id H -H 10 -r( p 3 F > U 14 U ro a 0 -ri U O 41 11 41 d 44 W (d N 0 0 0 G of x O -A m Id id 44 id ri 01 tl G H a) m bl 0 3 r) W G (d a) u o 0 v ,Ci 0 G o m x x x , )i x a rd r-I 01 9 11 u M 0 o H H id v °o H u u F+ (d O id r. G (1) to H a ri u m )a id u + ro 1, 0 O Id u) A C~] i U •ri 0 1J 0 G +-1 U a u y - t)) 0 ro a'i m 0 H z 0) w 0 to a 0 m '1 -H G G 3 o 10 1.1 3 :j •d 3 G 0 m Id A 'd -r1 w )I Id O t4 m a) ri > m $ .G 41 N O L > a) m a) 0 .G W m a) x Id -4 10 A :J ro G wa A )4 Z •ri G o Id .G O ri H r~i '0 ~ A Tr' H RC bi u •.mi ° 0 0 G ri N ' r-) ri G 0 U 'O m F 0 R7 W 4 A m 4a O (d d R) d > r1 Id qq 1 i 4J U1 L J-) o >1 G si m H 0. 0 G .G as iJ c , G u H a) m RS >1 4J04 44 1J ro H m O -ri L >i (d I-i p 'CS 13 ,C.. 0 .Ti G )d 1q3 •C: -yrx(i u )-1 0 0 41 41 -1 G G1 to 0 m 0 A d a) N N u m U 1As (d O -.4 :1 q ri Q U r4 -rA .ry X 0 '0 .G (D id 10 m q 0 Sa G 3 u1 •G C~ - S a) ~-i A N aC3 r-i itl Id :j 0 0 O 44J 0N Ua U G' G tm 0) rd 0 44(D 0000009-9 S G 0,4-40 4 4 3 i4 u m IOU 11 •ri -ri G X X u 0 ,G 0 ro )4 v (d 0 (d P a) id )d )4 Q y o .G .-1 0 ~ o -4 W 4 Id A p m (d Id > m m m 41 a a .0 01 a F > 41 -H a a o ~ N ~ y vl 1D r m m o •i N m W N V7 r m O, o .-1 N M V' (11 rl H .i .-i r/ ri ri N rl - •-i N N N N N N rH ri 0 (1) U) r-i 41 Id O O A -ri •rt X a1 U A 'U O ro ri O ri )1 w ro ro 11 11 m 'O G 44 H Z G O a .-i u- 0 O H r) a i ro 3 44 1 11 '3 (D ro 41 g f x G ro u o -ri u 0 m N 44 R1 U U) m -ri m m to a) O 0 a 0 40 .,A ro i m to . u )4 G > to m > a) 0 u i G -rt G (d 0 .4 nl G >u Id (d ? 0 '0 oW .-i bl U ri 0 X m 0 0 0 4 of 14 q R1 G O G 0 '0 m )4 rH .G A m G to d d •ri U 4) G id 41 Id H H Id ro A 0 4 T) 44 G a 0 0 10 11 A 41 j; L 4-4 O u o 0 0 ri - E •O -H 3 o m A A 7 b Off H 3 (U 0 44 4J > 3 t~ A) to H 3 ami 0 u v o u m 11 q o 3 G u 0 11 z3 (D N to G b) 11 (d 0 a q 0 O a) ro X G 0 of H O G -ri m G )4 3 u -ri id u G a ri H o H 0 m ro m 0 9 ri N F 0 11 O O 1-1 1-) ,G 0. 11 -r1 F u •L.' m G > (D '?y bi a) b ) O l.1 m ,C: G o 11 a a 1 0 s, " 3 .1 W P A of o 5~ G > R 0 m ro m m O 1 U T3 0 U r1 > 0 1.3 0 id ,G N 3 m o m i4 ro >i > 3 O O 0 ro 0 p., 0 bl U W 7 ll Id A -H .-i 0 11 G X 4-i X A G G 4j > X "H 3 U O x )d m 0 -r) 0 -ri k •ri )1 44 O O m 0 a) 0 U) 0 m 11 r-i A 0 44 , 9 a - bt •rt 0 (a o ~4 11 m o )a O G 0 0 H u G 11 0 •ri 41 0 0 (d G 11 O r- G 0 11 0 •rt 41 O L G •ri N X U 11 _4 44 -r1 •ri > > 01 7 11 10 11 0 > ro 0 41 0 0 z7 b a) ro A X b 10 -ri a o a aS 4 A sa G 0 2) A' G .G H G X m ro -r) Ul 1-1 m 3 q w N X 0 ° b m U N ra v (D ,G -mi ro 0 0 3 >1 10 m 11 q -H a) v 3 H a) )1 L W w rd - u rt m 7 a 0 7 .1 41 ,G fdd L F '10i 0 0 7 o N 3 N fu 3 0 11 .U 0 03 u .rd N sT 3 'd u a G m d u G 0 H U m 0) ro i a) 3 ~ El b •N 33 .U1"-. H r, N O >t Jp rd I4 A L 44 .OC'. z N A A ro 11 'c7 11 0 0 b ro -rt 11 b a c d G w ro ~ A o ' 0 o o -Gi -a (a «i 0 - u )4 44 'U - .G' V) Id r{ A 0 0 0 27 m m 0 0 E S~ m L N G v 0) a) 3 N )4 )i X S4 X 1) O O v 4 G 'C E N 0 7 ro H )4 0 r-I rn li u 4a )a -r N o 0 0 4 0 0 ::j O _c:ro 3 E r rt x rrd o w E to M u U u H N rl Ifi b r m T O .-1 N O r+. U1 N 0 00 7y O 0 0 4d N ri C•1 $ ~ N N .-1 ri H ~ U S4 z~ H ro Y w ri) z a -4 ji H Ln N ai CO }4 0 0 0 0 N +-4 m 3 ` N N H 14 o at H N H 0 V H Id a ui P, U) 0 F >n Q r-i U) 0 -1 H Id N N .X m uu ro a) A O q U N U 1 i ro e u W U 3 H H N i + al u u N X 1 1 L N N Cn y C N y u N m o) •.i U a) • M A N U U N U N A ry' O A x a) a 4k O [n U a) a) u a F m to 41 o " 0) ai ~ (a a) ro TJ V1 ) L) C.• w o u o a, o N ro fli (d a) a) N -Y1 b •N N m H O M H to (d r1 N •.i I-q U 44 N r •.-I > N Lp ,d N A yk - N U 1 ro~j N N U 9) C 0 G 0 N 44 O C A J.1 C 3 O 44 N U N ?1 m m ,d 0 0 )-1 H 0 . 10 O H O a) )i •HH •a to a) H to U 'd •,i N w ro ~ m •C !-1 O w .Q u N U •H a! w y N N .C a O ro O •.1 11 N O w O O -1 41 U H (D U+ a) N W -.i a W w . C Q) P O N 4 O fa x X N a x O u C 7 U O a -ri to C) 1d U a) N ,ci as U u u U O .C t"y O a) 11 N C y H 41 H p a) m m x a :3 H N U N 1.3 m u 01 W •n O m '14 O ro x C H ai Sa U H C F C a) w O d 3 U H .i u: W 0 S•i JJ G N N li d) w w P a ro m ro z a a rd L y C N a a) L -A .--1 rx -H m )i N a b o w a w Q) u v ro o cn N } q C Q sa td w Za A w !a a) Si U w Z C Q m W W 2 C 4-1 0 •,i o, a) C ,n to N ul -1 ¢i (D N to F tT N N O H to D to F y1 rl a) .c, W ,G t-) O H U) n• O tD U) H .7 RC H O H U) 1.1 4•i O a p. H O .ri 1 i •.i r 1~ GY U .W U Id A a) m 'i W -H 4j U) W U) O li C ~ 5 W U H a 0 44 4J a) 10 1 0 10 u W, a, 8 L) o m o v ~ 1 > ro t3 ° a) 41 y '0 •mi o U) 41 t 3 01 -4 0) rd 0) W .i 6) 11 ..•1 ri x U .k ~ -.i JJ to 10 X 1d .K r 10 •r1 0 4 2J o u is 0 .-1 i-+ C: .H al .i 01 as m •H rd o m 1-1 -4 .C .C o •r1 4 N w 1! U P, a1 w H 11 1.1 U ri 1J w O i) .-i N ~f• Uf b h [ D m O e-1 N M ~ N h m O .i N M sp ,t') H H N .-i .-I H H r1 .i H N N N N N N :1 4) N N w y U N 7 u - a) rd C ai b .H •.Ci ,-0 44 to H m L o A 0 m N 4 3 •Ai Id P4 •.•1 to ~ ~ H u 0 a) L p U b N H to C) O C O o W m m N > •14 o w m ro of 14 U N U w m U x '1 m d) f» 14 N to !a m (D -.i •.i m Z .,i 1 d w A C C v L a) 4w-1 ° N 9 a) o L 4J 4 10 b u 0 H W O M O )a a) O, to 1-4 C u d N .u y U ..i a) U C N ri w N y, O U ri td d w .ry d •a U N w 1d •.i K u 0 U) a) N w '0 o u 7 Um) A W N 3 q S-, .C 00 U y+ 4 0, N , x m U N C ro W O N H N W 3 W b of x a) .1; N a) x ro X X x x O O x N .5C U a) 4 U a) O O C• U U H U A iJ H 4i N H i H U N -H r a) H u C WW W s'[i U GI W U H 10 o 3 u' . v b w N cz r4 r X a N ro O C .C O A O O L O m 2i N v w 10 x w x w x x w w x a) to ~ u m N o a) w m cn w U) rn w m w A C u 3 f%. N a) W ro z N W Z W -•i z W Z U -.i O a) 10 > ro w o [ o u o a L L 3 - 3 L A F C m •O H uHi F H W H O W N~1 q w td N U) a) U) r1 U) 0 w 4 w u 16 .1 aJ U p: a) H a) fx H W 4 HHy' fx H kHH Al O N a) U+ aj Ch N G' >Y :4 0 m U m a) CJ )i R~, L H a td •.i v U N u u G U d u u .O u O m ro N •fi A O 0 u w u m r• 11 U) 3 L -,A •H r• O) a) G ,G r) ,n L U L C N .R U U a N L n N N O y O C O a) in •.i 7 7 .C a) •rl a 1J Id X U U a) U U L W O 16 ~4 Id ~4 a) a) .C .C O N N N O U m .C N V) N la w >J a u u u a ll o N N FC m )i o W oro N .H rn 3 i ~ ry N +-1 O .M H U) 0) 1-4 N U N r, u z1 1d W El) ~n Z H F:g 14 m _ ° 41 H r N d w k o W ~a N ri rn M 9: ri ` N N ri H IN En 6) U ~ U U H tl1 u n W to z U) °a4f: g N L H m - yl y a.i ,q 3 ro L N 4 b rn ro O bi 4 Q) L 4a b) u Nri 4 r1 Ol 000 4 rt1 N S4 O r-1 a) ri ro A N nt 1 L D 4 L 4 o p 41 x d Q) u o ri 4 a m o G ri D o •ri N a) U a) L ri -4 r+ m O Q) 9 . 0 >1 N -14 r) H - ri -4 r-i •A -H 'o 3 m L L 0 n. !d tIdi~ ll u a m r-i N •rl ri L rd R$ 41 H O 0 .14 >1 ri A 104 .f,' -ri H N ro of O7 U) O Id O F4 N ro p 4 4) b) O A !01 H L a O 0 r H a o J. 4 a m o m )4 L id m 0 -ri L -ri id 1-4 L ,4 O )•i 1-7 m C -H •ri U) bi 0 O) W Si 0 L o a) ai 4 d m v1 14 4 •H 44 rd o L m >1 4 O ~ O m m ~ r4-i 3 .0 U O N .14 O H L O O •H H -H L .4 - 0 ,4 41 .4 (d 3 -H 11 L 0) a 4 9 N 41 •Ij L ro m ri L O to O 3 r1 El a N m 4 U Id a) >4 4 m ro i 0) 0 NNN O td p O -H ro u L rd •.i a) O 4 U x a O -1 1-1 fd as 0) L N 4-i Q 44 L -4 d) U 4 O L S4 -9W o ro u 11-90 4 a - a 0) ~rdd O. a1 o za m as m L W P 04 -14 4 -14 U . d L A -4 a 3 8 o L o 2 >i 4 41 0 2 4 b) rH y roq -H ro s o 0 0 H .H 4 ~Jo A o of ro ~ ~ m :j N A ua q v W L -H w L 01 H W O L a) O O R: O o p r •T4i N yi O O L O 3 L R', W R: L w v (d A ?4 m w (d W m ? m L Q) m 4 m A n• + w u, w 0) pj m m O W L W O N U 3 Zi w ,17 r: u a) ° ~a d) H y o .L4 o i4 a H ~ H }4 H x m N 111 Ei 5 Ei X g -4 .N 44 O En EA En y ym G '1❑od H D: P4 r. r4 rt( CCC333 s Id > Id r u 14 4 .01 U H m H ?4 O .C 0b4') 4) .Li a) tyl :j ta En a) ri H U .14 1-4 0 m d) Id m ) U m H 0 O- 1 ro ro 7 U ri m (d 4 4 O r-i O 4 O N- .4 m ,4 O O O O u O U O !d N A L ~ 3 u A u ro L .d N to d U1 b r OD vl O .-i N N1 s>t ifi 14 r m 01 O .-1 N tri sN in .i .-I e-i ei r•i ed ei ri ri .-I N N N N N N fo I-) S-1 L L L ro 4 L Q) 114 m 1; u m - U .4 bi 71 a) .4 a O )•i O ro H H L 4 O ro ro 4 L F. O L a m to 14 4 -H .-1 10 H .4 L A A H 4 o at Q) 113 L rd Id m d 3 4'. o F 4 i 3 L -H U 3 N v ro m En N ro to ro 4 H > ?q R1 b 4 44 o 4.) tri M (1) U ro ro H m U - 4 N b • -1 L -1 q N Id 44 0) > - m b . p C L id 4 N r-i A x d N ro m m N U) L •H A O O 11 4 L N rd - - 3 O H ~4 rd a) 41 4 44 O1 4 N Cl) X id u ri U) of O L a) L b H 0 E N ri r-i yl rtf 41 D 0 o id r-i u x o 0 m A 0 44 44 a i Q) •ri X ro L 3 u a) m o a 7 7 r-i 4 w L u u ro o ro A 1-i -H - W H w -n O N a •rl a d N y o m m i L ro 3 L U N a m 1J Id .4 L m m rd u m L 4 ro H L 3 0 4J rt) X O N -ri *-i ro r-I A O E+ L id A ro m O 4 A to r{ a 0) r-1 A .-t ~o ,14 H •ri a3 N H id Q) ro 7 m 4) H O 4 ro 41 •H „ O cd ,4 L ,p m ro L m ro V 14 L H fd r O 0) u Q) ro $ ((aa~~ R; O o 3 H w P' O m m m ro m 4 O U w P; O 4 H 0) S 11 r-i m a •ri w m b ?i a 0 m L T-4 WW H N w U ) rU 0 r w U) ri 4 .4 ) 4 r. u H H !0 rU A 4 id .4 10 H L X 4 N r0 -ri .4 4 •r{ U rt b ~i E+ -ri 4 ,4 H > aa ~i H N ri (n id U) H F. ul H y , V) a x LI -rl b L U L 1J :j M [ rd L rl (d H -.i 3 U 4 v ri L a) U ro ro a) 4 Fi L 4 H .U R: H u L 11 A o 0 >1 A W z H ~i 3 H 3 bf Fi q W a H L) ) )i ~ q ro ~ O ri O O A 4 O L L 0 O iJ (d m ~ .s' N Id m p W y m F. to QJ .f•-. rd m i" .G bi 4-1 N Q) ~j 1 J p j y . Q) b .i Y r0 H 7 L rt L Q) L - 4 O a1 a ll 4 b 3 -ri U 1i d }1 0 p E 3 m 1 4 N 4 O -ri L N N 7 U U -.i r-1 A U ri ri A C a b a O U ,c ll m m O ro bi RS H ul m OW1 ~ .c 11 0 o U w :J, a .-i r~ n -s v1 m r m rn o K .*1 m in ~ m m o ~ ~ 0 M 0I 00 ~4 o w N r-i ~ •H rr1 3 N N 14 4 O ~tf H U) H 0 N C) :j z~ H of L a U) z U) oar v CO N o ro N ri m 3 ` N N .-i o at U) d O t.] z U H id L a~ a Ul z E~ Ln ~a U) Oa m N al ~11 to n U o D A a) m > u C W Id u .0 .C u L H L •H a) a a) r-1 .U G N fd ro R1 U H U a) U) :j r4 U rd •H 44 N > H N A I1 a) 3 O 1.4 a m O L A H v C Id u H N .C N G 3 a G r-i C .G H ?i m - N C b1 O U O •H W a o N - m u C u rtl N •H -1 N H m .C, a"1 d ,11 H U bl d) H 4 -r1 O N (d 1 U) H 2 U C O H O H 0 i N rt1 H 0.1 .-I A' A H >1 l •H 0 C U a r-I C m -H > •H N W N W H a) O m .-I x., 4j C fd H n. . U to •H 1 C a, -H G N )i ,C ro m u a a) G •H O m -H > o 1 Cl 1 a) E d r-1 1d H m C 0 a) m ~j 0 C 0 C t, rd a H 11 .C 0 U ll id A 3 :3 O bt C ?4 )-1 o to H ) a u C ~i w a) G ro H rd U o U -H o H > m m •H u •H 3 3 -u U .u .,i rd H C m a) U ro N A N 'U -.-1 to rd u a) $ O H n, N (d 2) C O O u y1 rd H U1 C N 1) rd a, C9 N a) 3 - ,C 1-1 to •H m ro C a m 11 C N C o O m >1 •H C .u W N A L ~ 4 U -H r 4 H fd p N .4 u .4 U m m t1 -H O 41 L C m $ N rd a) a) m U •d t) H 9 m id O Z U) •H 0 a m O rd a) )4 M -H w rd N 0 H > 0 a C ch .C tj •H 1) •H 3 a) U ro o a -I r U •H --4 ,C 1) a) 'Cf - CI -H m r o O m .4 li Z.. O !.1 O •ri G o u m a (d H U m bl rd -H H a 1a H U C ri U C 14 N ro 11 a Id 4 U $ •H m N H ~ •H ~4 Id 41 O a) a, aj rt1 C N N U of N L -,a O O -1 ri (ta •H a) 1J > a) iJ m 01 U W b1 U W O .-i )i 1) 3.1 m 4 U 1) 4 m N •H U) d ) a) Z u rd m id m •H 44 ro m u ro o H w m Q 11 O H C )1 a) 5 A 11 -H m to C O m U ZT 1) W C O U .4 it C O a) 1d S Ql 1d W U) O 4 a) 4 0 lT a) C id a) u •H W H > rd cn .H w ro 0 U C f4 •H C C H J) O m ) H H H V C9 a C. U •r1 a to i.1 L rd rd C W U N a ( .G.1 N 0 O ~ W a) 1 1J m H m C 1 ) 14.1 ~ . Ul p H O to m OU H N 1d 14 0 0 p W W H H .i N) z ro M b1 J Id U 0 ,0 O ro A rd 10 ro U) )-1 i f i g ° u ; .H 0 x 41 c r d w o m H to ° u 0 O U 11 ,f.' U li > H N 1.) C Id rt O ro 1 1 ro bl m H U H 1d rd W H A •H H •H m .0 O O C rd -4 N m t"r a) 1) 0 1 1 w L 0 N N ji C -H a 1 1. H rd .i N M W 1I1 ~o r m m O H N MI W tti 1O r m a) O .-i N rn V~ in H H H H H .-I H H H .•1 N N N N N N A y X U ni L7 H A U O N ro a) rrii L 14 O a) 41 X w A m A X m a) a 4 X ~ ~ U ,C H rd )d C O u rd at o 41 fy .u H a 4) ai b m ~ 4OU r; Do -,i4wz •H a) e O 8 u as fi u H 3 0 N m >4 X >1 ro >1 O H id 11 N a) td L H ro 'd O - (DO >1 11 H •H .C ri H O O O U N ro H H til x , 1.1 U U O 10J ro H ai H U 1G.1 a ~ 4~' )i O X .H r m 0 M al N L k H O E) G- W H p J) y4 ro x 3 0 3 C b1 44 0 a) 44 O .C. H H X R) ro H 3 13 Id ro ro :5 N .If O u 7 `O C H U li •.i ro o N H O -H O to N •O m a) >1 O H m H H U 11 G W w > si C a) a) m H v rd u O m A u ro o1 m 0) sa C z) 44 a) a) b )d x A -H m C )a L )i .G 0 ,C 41 H rd H O O N O }y t)f O fi N ~-1 L ro •H - aS 4J N U 4 4 u > i a) a) 4 -H C H b) m O 1) ro a) U C H N .H U H O (d •H C •H rd rd ri A W O 3 ❑O a m 4O a) TO L W 3 W m A H d a) 11 H d 3 C N d N. U O a) ,Oa) 11 Id iNd 00 H 0 N ai tm -A k W (1) > O N N v ,4 (6 U 11 m m b1 G o o W G G m .u U O C O 44 •H O 1) w H C m m •H )i H W Li o .4 m 3 a) u ro ~:l x m N a) 3 0 x ~ .J 1) 1-I N o 'd o o m U 3 > W O A 0 a) O V) H qq W rl N (d U ai W m o r-+ 4 m cd UI r1 U R 1.1 a) W X w w rn a X C -441 O W a) •H •H H ai O .r 2 w rd rd ~i ro bl 11 d W A r1 m H .-i I •.Oi U )H-1 N L o C .C C A •H M H D b1 r-i rd H a) U U) CL G H m rd u ,i u u b1 Ll C Id -H Si _4 O U) m m m "d •H G W O L H H a1 b1 C C .-i •H H o .4 •H H u H m N ~ 1 ro > U o m m a s G H H ro ro u rt 3 3 UxC a) H Q) G •H W a) G ~I H -H m a) O U N H 0 Oi •H U a) ca U H 13 O H O U C ro A v m U) U G ~ C N a) 4 N C )d G 1J ~ G O m o r o 01 N o O -H rd A m 4H to o N d u v -H rt .4 23 3 .H Sa O -ri to W rr ,y' L U A U) Si •H U) Id > m C 7 L m •H 1J m 10 U2 m m N G > 'CJ a) G -H a) m 1)H C a) m N - C •H O o L m w o u x (d m o) rd u ro A v w li G F a w U rad ° Q 04 v Fi .-1 (mil Nt W tti ~D t~ m Oi O .i N d,D (D N V~ Ul W d ro )i o 0) N H M 3 H N N H H U C7 U H rd L a El) U) z deI C7 H O ~ H N M w OD o N H ~ •H r) 3 H \ N N H z H H M U z" H rt a v1 a +n z H Ln m o~ 4-1 H 1-4 m b 0 O O H O .U 0 ~4 44 0 N > ❑C O w b ! O w y 44 ro .1 °i W 44 ° a N N O p m k C U 3 F w En w u ro > N w N .u N w ~i 5 5 H L O CU C w c + o m > H u i ~4 ~j 4 U) a) -H Id 4J N O G w H w C > O O 3 w 5 o m 3 O ro O > 2q m 5 ~u -H U 3 .a w - ld w fu 0 rd A I4 N En 1J In U ° w w >O ( C ~ ~ ~ d 0 41 En A •aHi E. N ° 44 7 ° U A ) b N o r U t N bl FC H o N m a d A j : A 9 L P , a w x roC ~H w vi o ~ q q r4 N o -mot ~w i g -41 y H _ G° ° O w .7 O r U ~ ro w 0 H O r4L U U N '0 li `LS .O w O H .U C .C •iy U w of 14 O H > t3) F 4J w O U a} m U m w N O r n• O m L p E ~ fd X N `O b a w o a A, x _Eli + Lw w i a H H U m W w •.t W > > •H Ul 4 , 4 bt w is A o $ a41 z .G m y N C N q N 3 w 5 2 .~~j d m H w H m a A > w O i A > ~ ril L Id O O C .4 a g w w . U) En 41 0 p u ~d H R: H b •H > N Ol -14 b1 N Oi > N >i Ul ~!i •.-t H 'd -4 44 -4 H w 0 2 tit q L w w 'O O O- .-i u 0 U c ° 4' o u w o v o u 0) a O O C O f H d U N O • 'Oi t ~ w O o m w y W .o o u u v Au L Id 0 o J-4 Itod or. rt m JA.I 41 rt N rn a en ~n r m m o.-~ N ~n a in ~c r• m m o H N in <M ul H .i H .i H .-1 {i .i H N N N N N N w d co p oro N ri ~ H M \ N N rl ri O .N En H w d o W z~ H > L a W wz U' .H UI °aA= M N M M bt 'tl O tJ O vI L4 00 w w O p i U w O- W w O N 0 i N ° 4 li m H w a m r d i a ;3 0 x 41 co U 0 w to y L ro > O al G v N 'U H •.a ul o id a 4.) 00 ~4 to w ~ F o ~ o 'o Co w i > 0 N > W > H N qq w :3 1 4 NN ~ wv b a H tad 'A ° ° - O p 0) a am N a W 1 tl A i i k i C u H rn o o H o a v rn o 0 En v o 44 A -4 > 41 w r' 1, d ll w O W W W H 0) . N 0 3 H N a w O ~ w p U 14 C4 H w 4". H H H U) 41 > .H A ° H W a a U V o N N m U ~ H v v ro o w w W o ; u ~ > , m H M u 0 o C O M w r- w N w w w x > H p w a in O b w c c n W o ( (xj N w RC U W N ro o H H H N O w a Q 1 o v q ,J " m z F TJ F w ul w in ro H m CA tn li F U O H 7 U H > 4 H H ~ H H~'''' CG Ol H P .i N }4 n O N C7 ri u sx U 0 V m Q) r ~ GH U) U O U ~ b ro O N ~ O L a N 0 U a rd O H H n 3 H G G -.-i N N 13 O n. O .C H (0 w H w o O O .1 > Ot ~ O w y ❑ 0 .Cr { Id W ny r U 16 •j L U C ~ ~ ? a Sr X a) L O H O rtf ,4 H C N rtf 0 41 X U U q k" .C U w a) ni A O a) rt W 3 rt rti to a ) p, 0 N +n H o H 'U i4 r d U U x G O N A 41 ' 0) L u w 'A 1-4 N A rt to -4 a) N i al F fn U O OI 0) H 41 O 3 14 a Q) tm U) 5 o a u C -4 w fa O a) a ' a rn o O O 1i -,A rd x U y+ ro ro O O r i; O L O w N U) 0 .U H H Z A a) r1, b ~ N r, V) a C7 H RI o Id 3 O m w a Z H G O x U W H x a) •,-i A x H >4 W U W O O 44 U r• U W V N U U Q Q •ri U N rC U v ~a a o o o ~a w~ a O E. a a 1r 0 4 114 a w a [ o v w c4 w o w o f4 ~ x ~ uw W H Z H ~ 7 2 ~e7 2 W Z W A Z N W 41 Z W Z W Q) 4 OH .U O H O H O H .7 - <C O N O H k •rl ~i RC of U O H a < o H ~ o H O U) '^f' to U) to C. m E, U E Va H F 11 W of H -.d N U) ul H 8 A U) H m H U co H r• 13 a M H W 0 E n H N V4 , i O, tq H u; EO H a4 u i 3 U UU °u °u 0 1-1 1-1 o o u Id •'i H 4 ) N O U ro H i 4 .U tT tJ b1 L U r- 0 10 rt f -4 r-A 10 ~ 1 4 0) .i N ,n m to N i ~ W a O .•i N M V~ 1(i b fD O, O .i N N, ~M to H H H H H H H .i H H N N N N N N 4 ~ ro U w A ,--i ~ d v 'i 3 R, 3 G J-) ii a) ~4 rt A 8 H bi N w o a L b, W •,4 U to C w H O 9 H 16 ~ ° )4 'd a A, 41 O m y u a ro H 4) 0 ~ 41 (D ji 0 t ~d ~tt r m C k :3 4 41 b1 G N Ch .H U ro N O o u U O 4 m H A y u O b1 a) m O U) U N b as 3 0) 4) C. +i li N ro tr N a) X O H A 4J Id b 4 U -'I G N .4 (D a) H -A G O o H 41 y m ro 4 i! H y H X N r. G id to H o a) (d Id 7, 3 b) 16 W a) •r) to 4 A H m G G 4 .C N H G w td ro O) E O X O - N ,q0 'd a) -.a id 10 H y 0Y H H 3 to H H U Id td 4 N Q 4 .u 7 rn N ~i x U) 4 41 X F 3 v 3 )n u W U) W 16 W •n ,-i H C W y x H w x X x w rtt H 3 x H o U nt - N U O U H W t~ Id O u U •Ui O U H U U U - A 10 ((ee77 G a) V 44 U C) H -1 .4 a U L x A 0: ~4 O L O O a A z U O N 44 In 4 3 O O U N U L O N O 4-I to n ° w 3 L U) W W W E N W 'c L W o w Z al is w z wW Z N W 3 3 w d ZO 0i > > Oo off 4) ~ o RC 0 A v 4 G q H H C E, cn W 3 H ~n H U) a) O H W •rl Id N U) t'i N N U) L 4 >1 'O H U1 U) Ri U L H ij a) H r4 H a. H ro L P'. W H H U)H ro 7 H6 .3 C, , i ~ x ~4 HE i x o a x o N o tl o 4 U U C4 a) u a) L U V u u G O O In 4) H W to N O is U -H In a) U ro C 5 H G a) •rl U 4 a) L W w 5 N N H b b to O .4 a) a) H }4 u •.i r• li O N td a U u N y w al to 04 x 'U N Id u ,G o o V) a) v .4 m ro Q 4 7 L 'd L N fn L L (a (n L O .i t`I M Cul ~ r ~ m O .i N V lD O .-I N t1 Cul ~1 r1 .-i r1 r1 H -i .-1 H N (•I (-1 N N N N M al m N o 'U N H m 3 ~ N N H H `s U m :j z~ H rt{ a mz ~ H o a~ L H W H 0.0 N ri m 3 ~ N N ,-1 a O Ls H U) U 0 c~ U id C: 0 a Ef) D4 0 Z O Ln C~7 .Hi m , o H to m m a ~ o ° a o G o N m ~ , U) G ¢3 0) ~ O N : ro ) W y, ~ Li a) " b) 0 43 U O ~i X C o H G . w H Id Q) m H li tr) R3 41 - rd O O O 0 44 a) 41 ED co) Ul SS o , a o 3 m u X o ro ° c n 0 0 - o cn .H 0 u ° m 4 -4 u c 4 4 -4 v ai u (d o o o o x u 1 CQ N 1 N G y.~ rt) W O 4 a) U 0 E N 1 0 a) 4 v c 1-1 1 (d r., N H H 0 3 3 rd c7 u a) 43 u C o H v wo o 2 „ ~ a) y 10 H a H d) -H 41 Q Id . 0 , tJ . , - 4 N u U) , O k U (d Z N ° fd L aY RC W U z , Pi .C 1...; 1-4 .u -4 -.i 1) H y Q N rr H p o a) b H ~ 0 3 x w r14 b x a) x i a o ~ x ~r ~ k m En u H u G' o 41 a) m -A w •Z. u H >4 u H z a LL o u N x C .4~ zL) H ° U W Im 5 v u o u M1I w q a) u + u C) L u R o ,--r d P~ aJ a7 H H d W a a) r RY A O •H H z W H z t~ TS qq 3.-' H z W P4 H ro O Id -H > N ; ( , O W O a) cn rd Pi O W P± O W RC H d. f. O Q) tY. U W :I U) W LO Fi A P w w m to w m w m w z a W .u A z R W O N z W z W N H z W u] ? o 41 U' L ,1 H ~a OH ° a ~a ° L F x n m C H O Z m H m p m H H U) O q at cn v rn a) m cn m a) to o H ,C Pi A N H Pd H (4 N! O H 0 H ~ 0 0 0 '.1 9 -14 14 O :1 ft tj L O to m . O d N ~ v v r-I ~ a) 4 w ° 1 u° a0J H w w N ~ N li o (d ro - H b w C y w o w Z (t H O Nf .C H ro ~d A 0 rd o U rd N{ w y L 44 •.a N r~ a ~n m r m m o N n v ~n co r m m o H N rn w ui H H H H H ri .i rl N N N N N N .U a v ate, H pa m p~ Id z m u O ) o v U o aCi W N b) u v i ro o 111 ai of x x , u i i a HW m O u ~ O w d N .G u 0 O a.a to ji NI ~ +1 rd H .u En H .C u N 4 a) •r1 H P. .r: li b a•) a) m - " d 0 ri O [ -14 N N ro O ri •H -H -H ri •H ro a) L 11 .,-1 O N q N o O q N) . rt RS ll 4 U > Im -l H R ~ j L ~ 9 (d H N 41 N W 7 4 a H j v rn u u 41 o a) 41 a u ro H A N O 11 a) S. ::j a) W u -C L H H -H C.' •,i R m O N w 4A tTi O H RS x U N ar. H 0 o W x 3 W x H w H W x H H H O 3 H O Y~ a q H H IJ W7 W W NS U W7y U W U W r W I+~ ~ j (.v~ [x~ ll H G (s~ 0 0 by O ~ w m x W w m W W w m x W bi H x W a w a w r: -ri w m Px w a w a• w w m „ a w w z O w z O f4 ra Z O q "i r1 R z o n• z O z O o to w a z O l~ z 0 z 0 W a 0 z 0 H H FC H O W H H H R5 H H H H H E m H m E m b) m O m m a) F m m m E 'd m W' U) Hg P'• m H W m H li Q) cn H m H m H H P: to H y m H m H r4 a) 1J m H U U U U U U E > U -rl u U U U z u U U U H L 7 n a) G 44 o ro U li O L Q) ro H E O H R a E y u w H 3 a n .o ~ ~ o, ~ ~ ~ :1 rv N ;v r• m N co m C, 0 o 10 N H 4 m 3 H ~ N N H o as H U z~ H Rf 1J 1~ afn a m z O U H m - O 4E N H N x d 4a b) a) 'u ri x x o " u H H U N .G N N A N H U U 4HA tT N w H H r > U U G .u N " Id O b ,-i v •m N 1 O O N 6 F4 rd 44 S4 N w a G H N 4) " .U1 (d i o rw H e " J-1 w x A 44 3 roq v a) > H > N U O 000 G' N D 4 a) C rt ~v w ro u ~ 1 AJ > G' w o A U C o al o, 0 } i 0 > A .C C U U -,1 C id >1 .4 N O O O C1 rl 2S L O N G H ,-1 a) N O O J-1 L - w H •r, H 0 o a w w ro a In o L o 3 -.4 m a) o U •,4 0 'O a) -H N N G O a) 3 N H D a) AJ H G U H,-i (VO G .H N O H O p, b, w O al a) b w 2) a) ,d x U0 w w H b ~ 4 C w H C (n ro 10 a) G (d S, O (D ,d a H O H N a) G H O '[d .G 1~ 0 O N a) •H w (d -4 7 a) G Id A •.i C4 C m 3 .G N w '0 w > N -A b O H o N N rt H H w O 11 N 10 G o N 3 - N G w H O H H -4 O 44 N "1 H 44 w ri a) •r1 w H J.) a) 1-1 -Li U -,4 0 I td (d w H w id H U) O iii a Id 0 O a) W b O O 0 N H ro o C a) 41 41 H 0 •11 3 3 x D -.1 100,C) '0 C u 0 440 r, ~ u N u N q a G di u o o a) a) o N N o Hy ta N D W a) O .u w '0 3 •r1 (d 4J r• U C -,4 N u N a) w •14 N U w w gx~ d H N G 7 N U ~.a w w w H U O W. a O C O Ri u) a) O U w (d w' O C ,5'., O C Al 0 0 .r+ a G o u ro U u w W a N A N W a + AJ N y w a w U D) N W w td U W W O C J..) •11 N W. D C w W U L N -4 W z 0.f O fd w W O H O ,G z N 1d •~i O O X O w U -H U U a O 44 -4 U O .G O FC H 04 O C, H 0 •14 .r4 to FC y, U •r1 H U A-) U Ol E W w O O F W O H b) C H ro O U N G w UI U 1-1 to a C N -,A AJ F-• U in a) N •.i rxa~ H p, 0 ai qN 11: H ''0 D, 4 -,1 N ,Qy: O rd H H 10 !.J 41 FO-YO§H~i(DOZEV:j 14 w O U t.J 0 1) a ui 0 x Ju ~ - 4 N o N G AJ m u •14 w > b) G a U w 10 O of G u (d G O a) a t3) 44 H •,4 U 0) > 41 w w G 0 U N G U N C O :j :j w ,z" a) N H N U 14 X 8 O A O 41 O y, (d 0 a) N G V a L > a w A a) AJ Id a roC qD d a x a 44 ~'111 L iG ld Ia m m m 3 7, m U U H N M IA b m O, O H H H H r-i H ri H N N N N N N (ro(.' :j o L U td a) y, N w N w U td w N •.i O a) .v U a) U U L O a w Ed L 4J ro b) L l u H 1) a) O G W ro a O L w •.i N A.J 0 14 14 0 u -,1 > ni •a ~ of ro 1n o u to w b 1 >,d) w O a) -H to ldC u g H r l,4 a) H .r. U U W y,- X U O U 44 r1 N N A A a u C •H ow w B w 9,400H w G ro x 1 3 a H U 19 (f AJ w ai N O -,A w C O O H 41 w H 01 A U ld li U •.i u U AJ O O H a$ H G A) w U G w N w .9 013 m X w N w -H O -.i 4 .H C t)1 H U o H C r: -,4 •r1 .G U 4A o w to 0 G a U) w w ,i u 41 w to u w G L 10 ,i AJ z1 U w 4 w w a to b 11 -,4(U ro v G U a u C N G w '0 0 > D) a) AJ w C AJ w o N Ci .1i H H w ,a 0 y v o L H a H od Id w H t1 G O U (y ro @ of U w N w •,1 H r, 3 O U w o 94J-H44 N G w O N -,1 00 R 3 w U H N w ••i U ,d 4i "1 44 j A U u aw) C w ~ N N H 9 H X > RJ w U w 44 10 ,d N 44 O N N N o 4a O O G 1d w f, (d w 3 A 44 10 0 a 0 u w H u .G p ro 3 -H al H J-) a U .q w r O tJ u N u -ri U 'CI w U w •r1 ,7 U a U O O U ,d li 44 3 w ,C, N H p 440 w ,C w O to G O O A AJ U O W O H U J-) x U A In 0 ci 0w o N a m Id u d w w ro >I N o U o 0 a id .L,' ro w w H H O C N w a ID H m o U H -1 a 7 G m w 4i A o H Cl 0 ri U w 10 O G (d Id 41 W z O AJ C 44 N C (a H :1 O a)) 3 N 3 ,.7 r• O C O C U N U )wi C td w •C 44 .u m AJ 0 EC Q, U) 0 N •11 7 -H w •11 1H :j V) -4 (1) rd ~4 a w H N )U) A N N % 3 U H ra H~[y+ O b 3 N O H U A y o N v - U -H U C 2 0 2o ,4 H w '0G 0) N y, O 44 4 N z H 44 A U .NC U w C •11 Q N N N b N L -a ro O C ,G O U .C. N N U C U H •.i U r-1 3 H - L H U U C C ri w 7 > (d :j U w w H :j at a) ri N N w O •.a N O w .C U O U w U Ei •,t N 7 H 3 > G u H C - H 3 N N 3 3 w U G N O N u N Q) O N H w b w N AJ 'r '0 u If 7 w a U N v co -H 3 eQ s Id u ro H > a N I N m w H H .c w w G .,1 - ro a) N :1 4 x J) x x -(1 4-4 a O O U 3 3 N V H y N U U L L H L •.i n, n a ~n ~ r m m in ro m w oro N ,-I M •,3 \ ry N H H H ~ U N z" H a) L a w m H vJ cn ao a~ H w 00 14 o p N -H \ .H M 3 \ N N -4 H ~ ril O b3 zU H W 1J a a, ~z O F ui u) a~ H 0 Ol M FCC 71 E O 41 a H L td u w 44 a) A ~ 3 R1 )•CJ m0 4 G U) N i O U o ro b7 ~ O 3 ri 1-1 O ' ) C C a) U C u y v C td 0 a) 9 C H ri u O u O F a) L A •-i 3 0 u a) )i O 0) ~4 41 H w Iwd L -H 0 7 O uq C F b) C •H 0) N m u ro . •.i 0 U ro cd C H N •.i (a a ro C'. O y, ri 0) a) .C F C. 4 -.d U 0 0) v .C L a) .,4 w A o H 44 O w 0 w En ri L U )d K W w d 0 w U) w a F~ H a H ll -.i 3 'td r.C r{ H 0 3 U) id U O as U) q .14 N ro ro 0 to O a a O ro r N O y w r. •,1 6 41 > .3 u N J., .U b L to z ••i is tM Id O 3 41 ai 1.1 0 Id w 0 S-I 0 w N 0 1-1 b u 0 L+ O -ri N N gg fy O u rH1 N 0 O td 1.1 C ro 61 U O 11 0 E o cn ~ O rY. N w C O -H L U td a) H q 0 O U) ro Sy' tp 9 ; (d N 1-4 W 14 td )-i 0 C- 0 .C L J. L 0 A )a 0 w O JJ rd ri O L W C O i C a) O U N N ar 11 bry) 9 A v N a) 4 L d y 0 a a rt w O to C O .,-I L to 0 0 U u g 0 F 0 L o w a) A b) C ..1 N Id N ,C w 0 H b m 4 'd L N 0 4 o L y, S1 at N N a) o 0 A L O 14 4 N ••i y .1 rd A :j C L b) C .i ro Si Id bt 0 k O u 6 ° H H •.i u O u o F 0 4 L O L 0 H Ha{ o a ro C m O 4 v rl td 0 C4 , td ri to a O -11. N •.i U 0 o .C u C L N O L H d ro C 0 .0 .C L -r1 3 ,1 w a) A L -r1 a) Si 0) .C H 4 •11 0 L w a y L C N L N1 A to x !1 . m 0 r-) O) 13 '1 A O a a b C N a4 co U 9)) -3 H a L A L 3 N N U a .i N r1 V ~ tD t~ m O , . •1 N N H N N ei N H N N N N N N L rA U) n W N a) Q) a) a) > a) O ~i m L Id Oa U ~ rt w O L to ro ro y u L )4J 0 ~ 0 0 ~ )A.) y v JA.1 N U 41 w E 7 U U H b -ri v a N v 14 Id 0 si 0 1~.1 m L C 0 •O n m C•• i 10 G -rl w N o A L 0 (d L H 0 id ° :j 0 ro O • w •~i 04 W z o H ) to H E O ri ri )d o N a m a) L ro ] WO w m W F H nE N L . to to 0 r-1 a to ,C L L v a ?i ::3 O y, ro r-1 O 3 h 0 11 3 L (d 4 L U w 0 4 E. U) H O W 0 ~ O R• w z o H to U) H~p E o u .C L L y, -1-1 4 10 u -.-i w -.i U a N U) -Q) a fd L b 4 L 0) N r-i a C -ri m N ai u O a In to N U) .i b C.' i X N a N .r: L C ro C'. 0 -11 u) -r1 y r N )1 (1) > G (o 3 L td L O 44 0 W A L ro 0 to 7 r., •rl r O U 'O 0) - )1 4 N N u O a u -H li O Q (1) U L N ~ 0 )i -H U H ,i u N a to ro -.1 >1 L s1 0 a O a Cr i C L 7 'O ?i U r N 1Idd y a i i 0 w b) -,,ii ro -.i 44 ;1 b L N X d C RrtU33 a) 3 0) o w 0) )i a) L L Ed A ro (1) m 41 M O N r1 0) ,C N ci O tb w k (L) o -ri N -fl O u b) C O .C 0) i N -H L C a) ro -y 0) tL N ( r-ii W r1 m k 0) G' aU'1 0) L roa) N Q) N H y ri (D L 7 rf O ,QN Fa u H Pi D) W Z o H m In H o u o y, X b El a) .01 v L C id 3 L N •r7', H 0 ° [Yi O 7+ ~ o O L L 4 L m •.i ro N )4 :j U U o L N Cr L td .r 3 co J~J C .C L ro N U lii L 9 v 0 .q L r(3 L a a) U u 11 ra p u a) N v ro ro OC1 u 0 L ~n _ yJ q 0 ro m U )i a N m a ro 0 ~ u C m ) Si y, fd r N 0 ° A 10 w L to U U •.i J) t1 d fo ro ~ u N u u 'a U n 0 O b) 7 W .y ~t v to e r m m o ' ~ ~i '"1 ~ ~ ^1 •o ~ ~ m H m .4 o N N N r N N ) ~ vt N N N N 4 OD N oro N ri ~ H m 3 14 \ N N r-I o .a H ~y N U ~ ZOU H Id IJ c w to z r-i C7 4 U) a H a -Izv a) OD ~4 o O ' N 1 ~-a m 3 ~ N N i o ,a H u) U N 2 v H !d lid am a U1 z 0 m °a H ~oWN 0 : TOWN OF LOS GATOS PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT .Al Meeting Date: January 23, 2008 PREPARED BY: Sandy L. Baily, AICP Associate Planner APPLICATION NO.: Negative Declaration ND-07-10 Subdivision Application M-07-005 General Plan Amendment GP-07-01 Zone Change Z-07-001 Architecture and Site Application S-07-019 Conditional Use Permit U-07-020 Variance Application V-07-01 ITEM NO.: 4 LOCATION: 115 N. Santa Cruz Avenue and 112 Wilder Avenue. 115 N. Santa Cruz is located on the west side of N. Santa Cruz Avenue approximately 175 feet north of Bean Avenue. 112 Wilder Avenue is located on the east side of Wilder Avenue approximately 150 feet north of Bean Avenue. APPLICANT: John Lien PROPERTY OWNER: Santa Cruz Wilder, LLC CONTACT PERSON: Grant Sedgwick, (408) 655-9296 APPLICATION SUMMARY: Requesting approval of 1) a lot line adjustment, 2) a General Plan amendment from Medium Density Residential to Central Business for a portion of the parking lot parcel, 3) a zone change from R-ID:LHP to C-2:LHP for a portion of the parking lot parcel, 4) conversion of an existing fine dining restaurant into a smaller fine dining restaurant on the first floor and office space on the second floor, 5) two new detached commercial buildings, 6) modification to the exterior of the existing commercial building, and 7) conversion of the existing parking lot which fronts on Wilder Avenue to a residential lot, on properties zoned C-2:LHP and R-1D:LHP. No significant environmental impacts have been identified as a result of this project, and a Mitigated Negative Declaration is recommended. APN 510-17- 065 and 071 DEEMED COMPLETE: January 17, 2008 FINAL DATE TO TAKE ACTION: General Plan amendments and rezoning applications are considered to be legislative acts and are not governed by the Permit Streamlining Act. All other applications must be acted on by July 16, 2008. ATTACHMENT 7 Planning Commission Staff Report - Page 2 115 N. Santa Cruz Avenue and 112 Wilder Avenue January 23, 2008 RECOMMENDATION: Continue to a date certain PROJECT DATA: General Plan Designation: Zoning Designation: Applicable Plans & Standards Parcel Size: Surrounding Area: Central Business District and Medium Density Residential R-ID:LHP and C-2:LHP Commercial Design Guidelines .59 acres (both parcels) Existing Land Use General Plan Zoning North Single Medium Density R-1D:LHP/ Family/Commercial Residential/Central C-2 Business District East Commercial Central Business _ C-2 _ District South Single Medium Density R-1D:LHP/ Family/Commercial Residential/Central C-2 Business District West Single Family Medium Density R-1D:LHP Residential CEQA: It has been determined that this project will not have a significant impact on the environment and a Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared for this proposal. FINDINGS: ■ All General Plan Amendments must be internally consistent with the General Plan. ■ The Planning Commission must make a finding that the zone change is consistent with the General Plan if their recommendation is for approval. ■ That the work proposed is consistent with the Redevelopment Plan for the Central Los Gatos Redevelopment Project Area (Section IV.B). ■ As required by Section 29.20.190 of the Town Code for granting a Conditional Use Permit. ■ As required by Section 29.20.170 of the Town Code for granting a Variance. e As required by Section 29.60.337 of the Town Codc for reducing the front setback. Planning Commission Staff Report - Page 3 115 N. Santa Cruz Avenue and 112 Wilder Avenue January 23, 2008 CONSIDERATIONS: ■ As required by Section 29.20.150 of the Town Code for Architecture and Site applications. ■ As required by Section 29.80.290 of the Town Code for landmark sites. ACTION: 1. Recommendation to Town Council for the General Plan Amendment and Zone Change. 2. The decision of the Planning Commission for the Lot Line Adjustment, Architecture and Site Application, Conditional Use Permit and Variance is final unless appealed within ten days. EXHIBITS: 1. Location Map. 2. Findings & Considerations. 3. Resolution for General Plan Amendment. 4. Ordinance for Zone Change. 5. Recommended Conditions of Approval for the Lot Line Adjustment. 6. Recommended Conditions of Approval for the Architecture .and Site Application. 7. Recommended Conditions of Approval for the Conditional Use Permit. 8. Initial Study and Negative Declaration. 9. Mitigation Monitoring Plan. 10. Applicant's letters of Justification (five pages), received January 17, 2008 11. Ordinance HD-75-6 12. Letter from Town's Consulting Architect, Cannon Design Group (seven pages) received May 3, 2007. 13. Letter from Town's Consulting Architect, Cannon Design Group (two pages) received September 25, 2007. 14. Arborist Report from Town's Consultant, Arbor Resources, received September 21, 2007. 15. Arborist Report from Applicant's Consultant, Barrie D. Coates, and Associates, received August 22, 2007. 16. CDAC minutes for the meeting of February 8, 2006. 17. Excerpt minutes from the General Plan Committee Meeting of February 28, 2007. 18. Excerpt from the Historic Preservation Committee Meeting of September 19, 2007 Planning Commission Staff Report - Page 4 115 N. Santa Cruz Avenue and 112 Wilder Avenue January 23, 2008 19. Letters and email from the public: Kathy Anderson (one page), received January 8, 2008 Don Davis (one page), received December 7, 2007 Charlene Lebowitz (one page), received November 20, 2007 Paul Johnannessen (one page), received October 5, 2007 Daniel Rees (two pages), received May 8, 2007 20. Development Plans (five sheets), received January 11, 2008. BACKGROUND The Coggeshall Mansion was constructed in 1891. The residence was converted to a mortuary in 1920 which operated until 1974. On December 1, 1975, Town Council adopted Ordinance HD- 75-6 to designate the Coggeshall Mansion as an historic landmark (Exhibit 11). On February 18, 1976, an Architecture and Site application was approved to convert the structure to a restaurant use with an addition to the south side of the building and to improve the existing parking lot located across the alley (Victory Lane). Subsequent to this approval, the Town Code was amended to require Conditional Use Permits for a restaurant. The use therefore became nonconforming and had 20 years to obtain a permit to legalize the use. On March 26, 1997, the Planning Commission approved a Conditional Use Permit to legalize the restaurant use. On July 25, 1997, Town Council adopted a resolution to modify a Conditional Use Permit to permit outside seating with the service of alcohol. On March 25, 1998 the Planning Commission approved an Architecture and Site application for an addition at the rear of the structure and to provide a decorative fagade on the 1976 addition. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant is requesting approval of the following: 1. General Plan Amendment to change the land use designation for a portion of the parking lot parcel from Medium Density Residential to Central Business, 2. Rezoning of a portion of the parking lot parcel from R-1D:LHP to C-2:LHP, Lot line adjustment to reflect the General Plan Amendment and Zone Change, 4. Modification of a Conditional Use Permit to convert an existing fine dining restaurant into a smaller fine dining restaurant on the first floor. No approval is needed for the proposed office space on the second floor, 5. Architecture and Site approval to construct two new detached commercial buildings, Planning Commission Staff Report - Page 5 115 N. Santa Cruz Avenue and 112 Wilder Avenue January 23, 2008 6. Architecture and Site approval to modify the exterior of the existing commercial building add new parking spaces, and 7. Variance to eliminate parking in the Parking Assessment District to. convert the existing parking lot which fronts on Wilder Avenue to a residential lot. REMARKS A. Streetscape The Coggeshall Mansion is a significant asset to the downtown. The open space in the front yard is a visual respite to the downtown. The Commercial Design Guidelines identify this area of the downtown as the heart of the C-2 zone and is composed of traditional Main Street type buildings constructed at or near the front property line, forming a virtually continuous line of interesting shop fronts. Pedestrians on the west side of the street walking north on Santa Cruz Avenue from Main Street, pass numerous retail and restaurant establishments. The last store before the open space area at the subject site is Design and Interiors of Los Gatos. Marketing studies show that shoppers take about seven seconds to form an opinion and lose interest when the continuity of the shopping experience is broken. Shoppers tend to stop at this site, look down the street, notice the bank immediately on the north side of the subject property, and turnaround. Therefore, the restaurant and retail establishments immediately` after the bank and further down the street, are impacted by the loss of pedestrian shoppers. In reviewing the proposed project, the Commission will need to consider how the open space area in front of the Coggeshall Mansion can become more beneficial to our downtown. Staff believes that the area in front of the mansion could be improved to be more inviting and designed to create an interest to enter the site to enjoy the property and to create a public interest to continue north on Santa Cruz Avenue. Retail uses designed to be quaint bookends of the Coggeshall Mansion could create such an interest and further benefit the downtown. B. Project Site The .59 acre project site consists of two parcels. The N. Santa Cruz Avenue parcel is developed with the historic Coggeshall Mansion, which is occupied by the Trevese Restaurant and Lounge. The Wilder Avenue parcel is located with the Almond Grove Historic District and is developed with a parking lot that provides parking for the Trevese Restaurant. An alley runs between the two parcels. Planning Commission Staff Report - Page 6 115 N. Santa Cruz Avenue and 112 Wilder Avenue January 23, 2008 C. General Plan Amendment and Rezoning In order to approve the proposed lot line adjustment a General Plan amendment and zone change must first be approved for 3,871 square feet of land area adjacent to the alley (Exhibits 3 and 4). 1. General Plan Amendment The General Plan designation of the 3,871 square foot portion of property at 112 Wilder Avenue is currently Medium Density Residential. The applicant proposes to combine this portion of land with the property at 115 N. Santa Cruz Avenue which has a General Plan Designation of Central Business District. So that the property at 115 N. Santa Cruz Avenue does not have two General Plan Designations, the applicant is proposing to designate the portion of property in question as Central Business District. 2. Zone Change The Zoning designation of the 3,871 square foot portion of property is currently R- 1D:LHP. The applicant proposes to combine this portion of land with 115 N. Santa Cruz Avenue which has a zoning designation of C-2:LHP. So that the property at 115 N. Santa Cruz Avenue does not have two zoning designations, the applicant is proposing to rezone the portion of property in question to C-2:LHP. D. Lot Line Adjustment The applicant is proposing to modify the lot lines of the N. Santa Cruz Avenue parcel to include a portion of the Wilder Avenue parcel so that parking spaces serving the existing and proposed commercial uses on the N. Santa Cruz Avenue parcel would be located on the same parcel. The lot line adjustment will not increase the number of lots and both parcels will remain conforming as to lot size. Following is a comparison between the existing and proposed parcels. Existing Land Proposed Land Existing Use Proposed Use Area Area 115 N. Santa Cruz 14,230 sq ft 18,101 sq ft Commercial Commercial Avenue 112 Wilder Avenue 11,246 sq ft 7,375 sq ft Commercial Single Family parking lot Residence Planning Commission Staff Report - Page 7 115 N. Santa Cruz Avenue and 112 Wilder Avenue January 23, 2008 E. Architecture and Site The applicant is requesting approval to construct two new detached, one-story retail buildings along the N. Santa Cruz Avenue frontage and to modify the exterior of the existing structure. The applicant is also requesting approval to eliminate the parking lot on Wilder Avenue to accommodate a future residence at this site. 1. New Structures Two new detached one story retail buildings are proposed to bookend the N. Santa Cruz Avenue frontage. A plaza area is proposed between the two buildings. The southern building will be 1,176 square feet and will have a maximum height of 15.5 feet. The northern building will be 424 square feet with a maximum height of 14 feet. The existing square footage of the Coggeshall Mansion is 7,943 square feet. The total square footage of buildings on the commercial site will be 9,543. The allowed FAR for the site (as modified with the lot line adjustment) is .60 and the proposed FAR is .527. The maximum height of the mansion measured from the turret, is approximately 40 feet. Exterior colors and materials of the new buildings will consist of wood shingles to match the existing structure, wood trim, and a dark grey metal standing seam roof. The front setbacks of the new buildings will be two feet six inches. Town Code_ requires a front setback of ten feet unless findings can be that adequate pedestrian circulation is available, that the setbacks are compatible with the adjacent buildings and that clear sight vision is adequate for vehicular traffic. The applicant is proposing a front setback that matches the building lines of the retail buildings south of the subject parcel. The reduced setback enhances the retail continuity of the street. Pedestrian circulation and the sight vision for vehicular traffic will not be impacted by the setback reduction. The proposed setbacks are consistent with the Commercial Design Guidelines which state that facades in the C-2 zone should be setback from the street property line no more than five feet. 2. Existing Structure To provide secondary access for the proposed office use, an exterior stair is proposed on the northern side of the Coggeshall Mansion. An existing window will be replaced with a door to accommodate the stair access. At the nonhistoric portion of the structure, the existing portico, deck and stairs for the outside dining will be removed and replaced with a new exterior dining area directly behind the proposed new building on the south side of the parcel. A new awning is also proposed above the doors to the outside patio area. None of the changes proposed will impact the integrity of the mansion. Planning Commission Staff Report - Page 8 115 N. Santa Cruz Avenue and 112 Wilder Avenue January 23, 2008 3. Fencing The existing wrought iron fencing along the N. Santa Cruz Avenue frontage is protected under the Landmark Historic Preservation Overlay zone. The fencing will remain except for two openings to access the proposed retail buildings. 4. Parking Lot The Wilder Avenue parcel contains a parking lot for the existing commercial use and a trash enclosure. Access to the parking lot is from Wilder Avenue and the alley. The parcel has a General Plan designation of Medium Residential and a R-1:LHP zone which allows a residential use. Therefore, the existing parking lot use is nonconforming. The conversion of the parking lot to a residential use would make the use of the parcel conforming. In addition, the construction of a residence would complete the residential character of the street by eliminating a commercial use in a residential neighborhood and would increase the Town's housing stock. The trash enclosure is proposed to be relocated at the rear of the N. Santa Cruz Avenue parcel along the southem property line. F. Architectural Review The Town's Consulting Architect, Cannon Design Group, reviewed and commented on several versions of the plans for this project (Exhibits 12 and 13). In terms of architectural design of the buildings as proposed, the applicant has incorporated all of Cannon's comments. Based on the Town's Commercial Design Guidelines and comments from staff and the Historic Preservation Committee, Cannon summarized the three following primary issues for considering the project. 1. To what degree will the infill of a significant portion of the garden in front of the mansion compromise the historic setting and quality of the existing structure? 2. Will the added structures improve or detract from the urban design quality of Downtown Los Gatos? 3. Is the amount of proposed new construction in the front garden area appropriate for the site? Cannon concluded that these important issues are value judgments that the Town would need to make. To assist staff and the deciding body, Cannon provided the following range of options which are arranged from the least to the most impact on the current site conditions: 1. No project. 2. Limit the addition to one structure. Planning Commission Staff Report - Page 9 115 N. Santa Cruz Avenue and 112 Wilder Avenue January 23, 2008 3. Decrease the size of the structure to the north. 4. Modify the design of the north building. The applicant designed the plans based on the third option of decreasing the original size of the proposed northern structure. G. Conditional Use Permit The applicant is requesting approval to modify the Conditional Use Permit to reduce the number of restaurant seats and to limit the restaurant use to the basement and first floor of the existing building. The second floor will be converted to office space which is an allowed use. Office space above a first floor is permitted in the C-2 zone and does not require a Conditional Use Permit. The number of seats will decrease from 198 (inside and out) to 135 (inside and out). No other changes are proposed to the use of the restaurant. H. Parking There are 22 parking spaces on the project site (16 spaces in the Wilder Avenue parking lot and six spaces along the alleyway) and 44 parking spaces in the Parking. Assessment District (PAD) for a total of 66 spaces. The project would reconfigure the two project parcels so that the six existing on-site parking spaces along the western side of the alley would be located on the N. Santa Cruz Avenue parcel and seven on-site spaces would be added on the eastern side of the alley for a total of 13 on-site parking spaces. The project would result in a reduction of nine on-site parking spaces. With the 44 spaces in the PAD, the project would have a total of 57 parking spaces. Based on the proposed change of use discussed earlier in this report, the parking requirement for the proposed commercial site would decrease and the proposed parking requirement would be met. The proposed residential lot on Wilder Avenue will require two parking spaces. A conceptual location of a two car garage for this property has been shown on the development plans which will have access from the alley. The following table outlines the required parking for the commercial use. USE AREA/ RATIO PARKING # OF SEATS REQUIRED Retail 1,600 sq ft 1/300 sq ft 6 Office 1,262 sq ft 1/250 sq ft 6 Restaurant 135 seats 1/3 seats 45 Proposed Parkin In District 44 On Site 13 Total Parking 57 Required Parking 57 Planning Commission Staff Report - Page 10 115 N. Santa Cruz Avenue and 112 Wilder Avenue January 23, 2008 Variance As stated earlier in this report, the applicant is proposing to convert the commercial parking lot on Wilder Avenue to a residential use. This project proposes a net removal of nine commercial parking spaces. Section 29.10.150 (5) of the Town Code states that parking spaces credited in the PAD cannot be eliminated. If parking spaces are eliminated, a variance is required. Under the provisions of Section 65906 of the State Government Code, a variance is appropriate if there are any unusual or special circumstances that encumber or place any undue hardships on a property. This parcel is located in the PAD, a unique area established by the Town in order to relieve the parking issues surrounding the downtown area. When the PAD was established, the concept that a property owner may want to reduce their land use intensity was never considered, therefore the Town Code did not include any provisions to reduce the parking requirements. Since the applicant is proposing to remove the parking lot to accommodate a residential use, and still meet the required parking for the commercial use, an undue hardship would be imposed on the property owner by denying the project based solely upon the removal of these parking spaces. The Commission approved a similar variance request in 2007 on Almendra Avenue, to convert a parcel which had an office use to a residential use. By approving this project the Town would not be granting a special privilege not enjoyed by other property owners. Therefore, Town staff believes that the findings can be made to grant a variance. The applicant has submitted a letter to justify the Variance (Exhibit 10). J. Grading To provide a useable open space plaza, the applicant is proposing to grade the area in front of the mansion. The grading volume will be 64 cubic yards of cut. The applicant worked with the Town and the Town's Consulting Arborist to design the plaza and new structures so that the Coast Redwood to remain would not be impacted. K. Traffic The Parks and Public Works Department determined that the change in use will not result in any traffic impacts. The use currently generates 566 average daily trips, no AM peak hour trips and 55 PM peak hour trips. The proposed use will result in a net reduction of trips (471 average daily trips, 4 AM peak hour trips and 44 PM peak hour trips). The AM trips noted in the Initial Study are incorrect. Planning Commission Staff Report - Page 11 115 N. Santa Cruz Avenue and 112 Wilder Avenue January 23, 2008 L. Trees The applicant's arborist report (Exhibit 15) was peer reviewed by the Town's consulting arborist (Exhibit 14). A total of seven trees are proposed to be removed. Of these trees, only two were found to be in fair to good condition (a 15 inch holly oak and a 22 inch canary island date palm). Staff discussed the possibility of relocating the date palm however, due to the size of the tree's canopy, there was not enough room on site to relocate the tree. In addition, the Consulting Arborist commented that the tree requires high maintenance to avoid its frond and fruit from falling onto people below. These trees will be required to be mitigated pursuant to Town Code. Five of the trees proposed to be removed have been determined to be hazardous and are encouraged to be removed whether or not the project is approved. Since the trees are a hazard, mitigation is not required for their removal. These trees consist of four pittosporums with a diameter ranging from six to ten inches and a 15.S inch Coast Redwood. The recommendations made by the Town's Consulting Arborist have been incorporated as conditions of approval for the Architecture and Site application. M. CEOA Determination An Initial Study was prepared for this project (Exhibit 8). The areas of mitigation are as follows: 1. Biological Resources - The mitigation measures deal with the recommendations made by the Consulting Arborist to reduce tree impacts. 2. Cultural Resources - The mitigation measures deal with the possible finding of archaeological resources. 3. Geology and Soils - The mitigation measures deal with a geotechnical investigation. 4. Hazards and Hazardous Materials - The mitigation measures deal with the removal of lead based paint. NEIGHBORHOOD CONCERNS: The applicant held a neighborhood meeting on October 13, 2007. The Town's noticing list was used to inform the public about the meeting. According to the applicant, 11 people attended the meeting. Issues discussed at the meeting were parking and the reduction of green space on N. Santa Cruz Avenue. Attached are emails and letters from citizens concerned about the project (Exhibit 19). Planning Commission Staff Report - Page 12 115 N. Santa Cruz Avenue January 23, 2008 TOWN COMMITTEE MEETINGS: A. Historic Preservation Committee The Historic Preservation Committee considered preliminary plans on April 5, 2006. The Committee considered the applications on February 27, March 21 and September 19, 2007. The Committee recommended approval of the proposed changes to the existing structure and determined that the two proposed detached structures would be acceptable for the site and had the following three comments regarding the proposed structures: The southern structure should be redesigned to be more subservient (regarding style, scale and mass), to the mansion. 2. Consider a more transparent building. 3. The context of the mansion shall be protected. B. General Plan Committee On February 28, 2007, the General Plan Committee considered the applicant's request to amend the General Plan Designation and change the zone for a portion of the parking lot parcel. The other applications were not part of the Committee's review. The Committee recommended approval of the General Plan amendment and Zone Change subject to the approval of the other applications associated with the entire project. C. Conceptual Development Advisory Committee On February 8, 2006, the CDAC considered a preliminary application for a similar request. However, these plans proposed residential condominiums on the second floor, not an office use. The Committee expressed numerous comments about the proposal (Exhibit 16). SUMMARY: Staff has carefully considered the comments made by the applicant, Town Committees, Cannon Design Group and the general public. Based on the above information, staff has made the following conclusions about the project. The proposed General Plan Amendment and Zone Change should be recommended for approval and the Lot Line Adjustment should be approved to allow a residence on Wilder Avenue. Planning Commission Staff Report - Page 13 115 N. Santa Cruz Avenue January 23, 2008 2. The elimination of the parking lot on Wilder Avenue to allow a residential use should be . approved. 3. The modification of the Conditional Use Permit to reduce the intensity of the use should be approved. 4. The exterior changes proposed to the Coggeshall Mansion should be approved since the integrity of the structure will not be impacted. 5. The parking space and trash enclosure relocations should be approved. 6. The mansion is a treasure that must be preserved. The question is whether any structures should be allowed in front of the mansion. To protect the view of the mansion and strengthen the retail presence in the neighborhood, the southern building should be significantly reduced in size to be consistent with the building proposed to the north. The two modest structures will frame the mansion. The southern building could be deleted but staff believes it will improve the retail vitality of the area and partially screen the non- historic addition to the mansion. 7. The outdoor dining should also be more visible and the plaza should be designed to incorporate seating areas and potentially two to three historically-designed push carts could be allowed to create vitality to the plaza that would encourage pedestrians to enter the site. Providing visible activities and passive areas, the site will activate the site, strengthen the retail streetscape in downtown, and promote pedestrian circulation. " RECOMMENDATION: If the Planning Commission concurs with staffs summary above, the Commission should continue all the applications to a date certain with the following directions. 1. Design a smaller building to the south similar in size to the building to the north. 2. Create a plaza that has visible outside dining. 3. Incorporate seating areas and other pedestrian friendly activities in the plaza. If the Commission finds merit with the project as proposed, the following actions are required: 1. Recommend that the Town Council adopt the General Plan amendment and Zone Change (Exhibits 3 and 4). 2. Recommend that the Council make the Mitigated Negative Declaration (Exhibit 8) and adopt the Mitigation Monitoring Plan (Exhibit 9). Planning Commission Staff Report - Page 14 115 N. Santa Cruz Avenue January 23, 2008 3. Make the required findings and considerations (Exhibit 2). 4. Approve the lot line adjustment subject to conditions (Exhibit 5). 5. Approve the Architecture and Site application as modified to reduce the square footage of the proposed southern retail building subject to conditions (Exhibit 6). 6. Approve the modification of the Conditional Use Permit subject to conditions (Exhibit 7 7. Approve the Variance. The following are other alternative actions the Commission could take: 1. Deny the applications, or 2. Recommend the General Plan Amendment and Zone Change to Town Council and approve the other applications but modify the Architecture and Site application as follows: a. Eliminate one of the retail buildings, or b. Eliminate both of the proposed retail buildings. aUSAT Prepared y: Sandy L. Baily, Associate Planner BNL:SLB:mdc I I r pproved by: Bud N. Lortz, Director of Community Development cc: John Lien, 196 College Avenue, Los Gatos, CA 95030 Santa Cruz Wilder, LLC, 50 W. San Fernando Street #320, San Jose, CA 95113 N:\DEV\REPORTS\200 8\ 115 nsc. l . doc 12 wl"Wer Avg J. 115 N. Santa Cruz EXHIBIT 1 REQUIRED FINDINGS AND CONSIDERATIONS FOR 115 N. Santa Cruz Avenue and 112 Wilder Avenue Negative Declaration ND-07-10 Subdivision Application M-07-005 General Plan Amendment GP-07-01 Zone Change Z-07-001 Architecture and Site Application S-07-019 Conditional Use Permit U-07-020 Variance Application V-07-01 Requesting approval of 1) a lot line adjustment, 2) a General Plan amendment from Medium Density Residential to Central Business for a portion of the parking lot parcel, 3) a zone change from R-1D:LHP to C-2:LHP for a portion of the parking lot parcel, 4) conversion of an existing fine dining restaurant into a smaller fine dining restaurant on the first floor and office space on the second floor, 5) two new detached commercial buildings, 6) modification to the exterior of the existing commercial building, and 7) conversion of the existing parking lot which fronts on Wilder Avenue to a residential lot, on properties zoned C-2:LHP and R- 1D:LHP. No significant environmental impacts have been identified as a result of this project, and a Mitigated Negative Declaration is recommended. APN 510-17-065 and 071 PROPERTY OWNER: Santa Cruz Wilder, LLC APPLICANT: John Lien FINDINGS ■ All General Plan Amendments must be found to be internally consistent with the General Plan. ■ That the zone change is consistent with the General Plan. ■ As required by Section 29.20.170 of the Town Code for granting a variance the deciding body, on the basis of the evidence submitted at the hearing, may grant a variance if it finds that: (1) Because of special circumstances applicable to the property, including size, shape, topography, location or surroundings, the strict application of this ordinance deprives such property of privileges enjoyed by other property in the vicinity and under identical zone; and (2) The granting of a variance would not constitute a grant of special privileges inconsistent with the limitations upon other properties in the vicinity and zone in which such property is situated. ■ As required by Section 29.20.190 of the Town Code for granting a Conditional Use Permit. EXHIBIT 2 The deciding body, on the basis of the evidence submitted at the hearing, may grant a conditional use permit when specifically authorized by the provisions of the Town Code if it finds that: (1) The proposed uses of the property are essential or desirable to the public convenience or welfare; (2) The proposed uses will not impair the integrity and character of the zone; (3) The proposed uses would not be detrimental to public health, safety or general welfare; and (4) The proposed uses of the property are in harmony with the various elements or objectives of the General Plan and the purposes of the Town Code. ■ As required by Section 29.60.337 of the Town Code for reducing the front setback. Sec. 29.60.337. Improvements within yards abutting a street. (a) Improvements may be permitted in any required front yard and any required side yard abutting a street in a C-2 or central business district commercial zone if the deciding body makes all of the following findings: (1) Pedestrian safety will not be impaired; (2) The strectscape would be enhanced as a result of the proposed improvements; (3) The improvements are in character with the adjacent buildings; and (4) The improvements will not obstruct the clear sight vision of vehicular traffic. ■ That the work proposed is consistent with the Redevelopment Plan for the Los Gatos Redevelopment Project Area (Section IV.B). CONSIDERATIONS ® As required by Section 29.20.150 of the Town Code for Architecture and Site applications. Sec. 29.20.150. Considerations in review of applications. The deciding body shall consider all relevant matter including, but not limited to, the following: (1) Considerations relating to traffic safety and traffic congestion. The effect of the site development plan on traffic conditions on abutting streets; the layout of the site with respect to locations and dimensions of vehicular and pedestrian entrances, exits, drives, and walkways; the adequacy of off-street parking facilities to prevent traffic congestion; the location, arrangement, and dimension of truck loading and unloading facilities; the circulation pattern within the boundaries of the development, and the surfacing, lighting and handicapped accessibility of off- street parking facilities. a. Any project or development that will add traffic to roadways and critical intersections shall be analyzed, and a determination made on the following matters: 1. The ability of critical roadways and major intersections to accommodate existing traffic; 2. Increased traffic estimated for approved developments not yet occupied; and 3. Regional traffic growth and traffic anticipated for the proposed project one (1) year after occupancy. b. The deciding body shall review the application for traffic roadway/intersection capacity and make one (1) of the following determinations: The project will not impact any roadways and/or intersections causing the roadways and/or intersections to exceed their available capacities. 2. The project will impact a roadway(s) and/or intersection(s) causing the roadway(s) and/or intersection(s) to exceed their available capacities. Any project receiving Town determination subsection (1)b.1. may proceed. Any project receiving Town determination subsection (1)b.2. must be modified or denied if the deciding body determines that the impact is unacceptable. In determining the acceptability of a traffic impact, the deciding body shall consider if the project's benefits to the community ovemde the traffic impacts as determined by specific sections from the general plan and any applicable specific plan. (2) Considerations relating to outdoor advertising. The number, location, color, size, height, lighting and landscaping of outdoor advertising signs and structures in relation to the creation of traffic hazards and the appearance and harmony with adjacent development. Specialized lighting and sign systems may be used to distinguish special areas or neighborhoods such as the downtown area and Los Gatos Boulevard. (3) Considerations relating to landscaping. The location, height, and materials of walls, fences, hedges and screen plantings to insure harmony with adjacent development or to conceal storage areas, utility installations, parking lots or unsightly development; the planting of ground cover or other surfacing to prevent dust and erosion; and the unnecessary destruction of existing healthy trees. Emphasize the use of planter boxes with seasonal flowers to add color and atmosphere to the central business district. Trees and plants shall be approved by the Director of Parks, Forestry and Maintenance Services for the purpose of meeting special criteria, including climatic conditions, maintenance, year-round versus seasonal color change (blossom, summer foliage, autumn color), special branching effects and other considerations. (4) Considerations relating to site layout. The orientation and location of buildings and open spaces in relation to the physical characteristics of the site and the character of the neighborhood; and the appearance and harmony of the buildings with adjacent development. Buildings should strengthen the form and image of the neighborhood (e.g. downtown, Los Gatos Boulevard, etc.). Buildings should maximize preservation of solar access. In the downtown, mid-block pedestrian arcades linking Santa Cruz Avenue with existing and new parking facilities shall be encouraged, and shall include such crime prevention elements as good sight lines and lighting systems. (5) Considerations relating to drainage. The effect of the site development plan on the adequacy of storm and surface water drainage. (6) Considerations relating to the exterior architectural design of buildings and structures. The effect of the height, width, shape and exterior construction and design of buildings and structures as such factors relate to the existing and future character of the neighborhood and purposes of the zone in which they are situated, and the purposes of architecture and site approval. Consistency and compatibility shall be encouraged in scale, massing, materials, color, texture, reflectivity, openings and other details. (7) Considerations relating to lighting and street furniture. Streets, walkways, and building lighting should be designed so as to strengthen and reinforce the image of the Town. Street furniture and equipment, such as lamp standards, traffic signals, fire hydrants, street signs, telephones, mail boxes, refuse receptacles, bus shelters, drinking fountains, planters, kiosks, flag poles and other elements of the street environment should be designated and selected so as to strengthen and reinforce the Town image. (8) Considerations relating to access for physically disabled persons. The adequacy of the site development plan for providing accessibility and adaptability for physically disabled persons. Any improvements to a nonresidential building where the total valuation of alterations, structural repairs or additions exceeds a threshold value established by resolution of the Town Council, shall require the building to be modified to meet the accessibility requirements of title 24 of the California Administrative Code adaptability and accessibility. In addition to retail, personal services and health care services are not allowable uses on nonaccessible floors in new nonresidential buildings. Any change of use to retail, health care, or personal service on a nonaccessible floor in a nonresidential building shall require that floor to be accessible to physically disabled persons pursuant to the accessibility requirements of title 24 of the California Administrative Code and shall not qualify the building for unreasonable hardship exemption from meeting any of those requirements. This provision does not effect lawful uses in existence prior to the enactment of this chapter. All new residential developments shall comply with the Town's adaptability and accessibility requirements for physically disabled persons established by resolution. (9) Considerations relating to the location of a hazardous waste management facility. A hazardous waste facility shall not be located closer than five hundred (500) feet to any residentially zoned or used property or any property then being used as a public or private school primarily educating persons under the age of eighteen (18). An application for such a facility will require an environmental impact report, which may be focused through the initial study process. ■ As required by Section 29.80.290 of the Town Code for landmark sites. See. 29.80.290. Standards for review. In evaluating applications, the deciding body shall consider the architectural style, design, arrangement, texture, materials and color, and any other pertinent factors. Applications shall not be granted unless: On landmark sites, the proposed work will neither adversely affect the exterior architectural characteristics or other features of the landmark (and, where specified in the designating ordinance for a publicly owned landmark, its major interior architectural features) nor adversely affect the character of historical, architectural or aesthetic interest or value of the landmark and its site. N:\DEV\FINDINGS\nsc 115.doc RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION OF THE TOWN OF LOS GATOS AMENDING THE GENERAL PLAN TO CHANGE THE DESIGNATION FROM MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL TO CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT FOR A PORTION OF A PROPERTY AT 112 WILDER AVENUE TO BE COMBINED WITH 115 N. SANTA CRUZ AVENUE WHEREAS, pursuant to Government Code Section 65353, the Town Council conducted a public hearing for consideration of amendments to the General Plan on , 2008. WHEREAS, during this hearing, the Town Council considered the General Plan Amendment to change the land use designation from Medium Density Residential to Central Business District fora portion of the property. RESOLVED, the Town Council finds that (a) the proposed General Plan amendment is internally consistent with the existing goals and policies of the General Plan and its corresponding elements and (b) that all proceedings have been conducted in compliance with the provisions of Government Code Section 65350 et seq RESOLVED, the Town Council hereby changes the land use designation of the General Plan as shown on Exhibit A from Medium Density Residential to Central Business District. FJMIBIT 3 PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Town Council of the Town of Los Gatos, California, held on the day of , 2008 by the following vote: COUNCIL MEMBERS AYES : NAPES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: SIGNED: GATOS MAYOR OF THE TOWN OF LOS LOS GATOS, CALIFORNIA ATTEST: CLERK OF THE TOWN OF LOS GATOS LOS GATOS, CALIFORNIA nsc115.GPamend 115 N. Santa Cruz 112 Wilder Avenue TOWN OF LOS OATOS Application No. GP-07-001 A.P.N. # 510-17-071 Change of the general plan leap amending the Town General Plait. From: Medium Density Residential (5-12 units per acre) To: Central Business District Recommended by Planning Commission Approved by Town Council Date: Town Clerk Mayor Date: Reso: Exhibit A ORDINANCE AN ORDINANCE OF THE TOWN OF LOS GATOS AMENDING THE ZONING MAP FROM R-1D:LHP TO C-2:LHP FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 112 WILDER AVENUE TO BE COMBINED WITH 115 N. SANTA CRUZ AVENUE THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF LOS GATOS ORDAINS: SECTION I The Zoning Map of the Town is hereby amended as shown on Exhibit A. SECTION Il This Ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the Town Council of the Town of Los Gatos on, 2008, and adopted by the following vote as an ordinance of the Town of Los Gatos at a meeting of the Town Council of the Town of Los Gatos on, 2008. This ordinance takes effect 30 days after it is adopted. COUNCIL MEMBERS: AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: SIGNED:. MAYOR OF THE TOWN OF LOS GATOS LOS GATOS, CALIFORNIA ATTEST: CLERK ADMINISTRATOR TOWN OF LOS GATOS LOS GATOS, CALIFORNIA WDEVIORDS~nsc 115.zc.doc EXHIBIT 4 _ J t } j! rr.. j Jr J " J i ! r ! -71 t ? 115 N Santa Cruz 112 Wilder Avenue TOWN OF LOS "-t-X Application No. Z-07-001 A.P.N. # 510-17-071 Change of the zoning map amending the Town Zoning Ordinance. X Zone Change Prezoning From: R-1D:LHP To: C-2:LHP Recommended by Planning Commission Date: Approved by `Town Council Date: Ord: Town Clerk Mayor Exhibit A CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT 115 N. Santa Cruz Avenue and 112 Wilder Avenue Negative Declaration N11)-07-10 Subdivision Application M-07-005 General Plan Amendment GP-07-01 Zone Change Z-07-001 Architecture and Site Application S-07-019 Conditional Use Permit U-07-020 Variance Application V-07-01 Requesting approval of 1) a lot line adjustment, 2) a General Plan amendment from Medium Density Residential to Central Business for a portion of the parking lot parcel, 3) a zone change from R-1D:LHP to C-2:LHP for a portion of the parking lot parcel, 4) conversion of an existing fine dining restaurant into a smaller fine dining restaurant on the first floor and office space on the second floor, 5) two new detached commercial buildings, 6) modification to the exterior of the existing commercial building, and 7) conversion of the existing parking lot which fronts on Wilder Avenue to a residential lot, on properties zoned C-2:LHP and R-1D:LHP. No significant environmental impacts have been identified as a result of this project, and a Mitigated Negative Declaration is recommended. APN 510-17-065 and 071 PROPERTY OWNER: Santa Cruz Wilder, LLC APPLICANT: John Lien TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT, (Planning Division) 1. APPROVAL. The approval of this application is contingent upon the adoption of the General Plan amendment and the Zone Change for the lot area being adjusted. TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE DIRECTOR OF PARKS AND PUBLIC WORKS (Public Works Division) 2. CERTIFICATE OF LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT. A Certificate of Lot Line Adjustment shall be recorded. Two copies of the legal description for each new lot configuration, a plat map (8-'h in. X 11 in.) and two copies of the legal description of the land to be exchanged shall be submitted to the Engineering Division of the Parks & Public Works Department for review and approval. The submittal shall include closure calculations, title reports less than 90 days old and the appropriate fee. The certificate shall be recorded before any permits may be issued. NADEV\C0NDITNS\200 8\nsc 115.I1a, doc FMIBIT 5 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Architecture and Site Application 115 N. Santa Cruz Avenue and 112 Wilder Avenue Negative Declaration ND-07-10 Subdivision Application M-07-005 General Plan Amendment GP-07-01 Zone Change Z-07-001 Architecture and Site Application S-07-019 Conditional Use Permit U-07-020 Variance Application V-07-01 Requesting approval of 1) a lot line adjustment, 2) a General Plan amendment from Medium Density Residential to Central Business for a portion of the parking lot parcel, 3) a zone change from R-1D:LHP to C-2:LHP for a portion of the parking lot parcel, 4) conversion of an existing fine dining restaurant into a smaller fine dining restaurant on the first floor and office space on the second floor, 5) two new detached commercial buildings, 6) modification to the exterior of the existing commercial building, and 7) conversion of the existing parking lot which fronts on Wilder Avenue to a residential lot, on properties zoned C-2:LHP and R-1D:LHP. No significant environmental impacts have been identified as a result of this project, and a Mitigated Negative Declaration is recommended. APN 510-17-065 and; 071 PROPERTY OWNER: Santa Cruz Wilder, LLC APPLICANT: John Lien TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE PLANNING DIRECTOR: (Planning Division) 1. APPROVAL: This application shall be completed in accordance with all of the conditions of approval listed below and in substantial compliance with the approved plans. Any changes or modifications made to the approved plans shall be approved by the Development Review Committee, Director of Community Development or the Historic Preservation Committee, depending on the scope of the change(s). 2. EXPIRATION: Zoning approval will expire two years from the approval date pursuant to Section 29.20.320 of the Town Code, unless the approval has been vested. 3. TREE REMOVAL PERMIT. A Tree Removal Permit shall be obtained prior to the issuance of a Building, Grading or Encroachment Permit. 4. MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT. All mechanical equipment shall be screened and the screening shall match the building in terms of material and color. Noise levels from the equipment shall not exceed what is permitted by Section 16.20.025 of the Town Code. The building permit plans shall include details of the screen and EXHIBIT 6 the spec sheets to ensure that the equipment will be screened. The screening shall not exceed the height on the approved plans 5. GENERAL. All existing trees shown to remain on the plan and newly planted trees are specific subjects of approval of this plan and must remain on site. 6. NEW TREES. The new trees to be planted shall be double-staked, using rubber tree ties and shall be planted prior to occupancy. 7. PROTECTIVE FENCING. Prior to any construction or building permits being issued, the applicant shall meet with the Parks Superintendent concerning the need for protective fencing around the existing trees. Such fencing is to be installed prior to, and be maintained during, construction. The fencing shall be a four foot high chain link attached to steel poles driven two feet into the ground when at the dripline of the tree. If the fence has to be within eight feet of the trunk of the tree, a fence base may be used, as in a typical chain link fence that is rented. 8. *ARBOR RESOURCES. All recommendations made by Arbor Resources (September 21, 2007) shall be implemented to eliminate or minimize the construction-related impacts on the trees to be retained. Recommendations are listed under Section 4.0, recommendations of the arborist's report. These include recommendations under the Design Guidelines section (addressing tree location mapping, protective fencing, building setback, trenching, drainage facilities, and installation of new trees) and the Protection Measures Before and During Construction section (addressing fencing, removal of hardscape, demolition, work within tree canopies, etc). The report's recommendations are included as Attachment 2 of the Initial Study. 9. ARBORIST REQUIREMENTS. The developer shall implement, at their cost, all recommendations noted above. A Compliance Memorandum shall be prepared and submitted with the building permit application detailing how the recommendations have or will be addressed. These recommendations must be incorporated in the building permit plans, and completed prior to issuance of a building permit where applicable. (Building Division) 10. PERMITS REQUIRED: A building permit shall be required for the alteration of the existing structure, the new buildings and the parking lot improvements. Separate permits are required for electrical, mechanical, and plumbing work as necessary. 11. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: The Conditions of Approval must be blue-lined in full on the cover sheet of the construction plans. A Compliance Memorandum shall be prepared and submitted with the building permit application detailing how the Conditions of Approval will be addressed. 12. SIZE OF PLANS: For sets of construction plans, maximum size 24" x 36 13. CODES: Projects will be required to conform to the 2007 California Building, Fire, Mechanical, Electrical, and Plumbing Codes. The California Codes are based on model codes; 2006 International Building Code and Fire Code and 2006 Uniform Plumbing and Mechanical Codes and the 2005 National Electrical Code. 14. SOILS REPORT: A soils report, prepared to the satisfaction of the Building Official, containing foundation and retaining wall design recommendations, may be required to be submitted with the building permit application. This report shall be prepared by a licensed civil engineer specializing in soils mechanics. 15. FOUNDATION INSPECTIONS: A pad certificate prepared by a licensed civil engineer or land surveyor may be required to be submitted to the project building inspector at foundation inspection. This certificate shall certify compliance with the recommendations as specified in the soils report; and, the building pad elevation, on-site retaining wall locations and elevations are prepared according to approved plans. Horizontal and vertical controls shall be set and certified by a licensed surveyor or registered civil engineer for the following items: A. Building pad elevation B. Finish floor elevation C. Foundation corner locations 16. BACKWATER VALVE: The scope of this project may require the installation of a sanitary sewer backwater valve per Town Ordinance 6.50.025. Please provide information on the plans if a backwater valve is required and the location of the installation. The Town of Los Gatos Ordinance and West Valley Sanitation District (WVSD) requires backwater valves on drainage piping serving fixtures that have flood level rims less than 12-inches above the elevation of the next upstream manhole. 17. TITLE 24 - COMMERCIAL: The proposed tenant improvements, will require upgrades to comply with the latest California Title 24 Accessibility Standards. Necessary work shall be first investigated by the design architect, then confirmed by Town staff. 18. SPECIAL INSPECTIONS: When a special inspection is required by UBC Section 1701, the architect or engineer of record shall prepare an inspection program that shall be submitted to the Building Official for approval prior to issuance of the building permit. The Town Special Inspection form must be completely filled-out, signed by all requested parties, and be blue-lined on the construction plans. Special Inspection forms are available from the Building Division Service Counter or online at www.los atg osea.gov/building 19. NONPOINT SOURCE POLLUTION STANDARDS SHEET: The Town standard Santa Clara County Valley Nonpoint Source Pollution Control Program Sheet (or Clean Bay Sheet 24x36) shall be part of the plan submittal as the second page. The specification sheet is available at the Building Division Service Counter for a fee of $2 or at San Jose Blue Print for a fee. 20. PLANS: The construction plans shall be prepared under the direct supervision of a licensed architect or engineer. (Business and Professionals Code Section 5538) 21. APPROVALS REQUIRED: The project requires the following departments and agencies approval before issuing a building permit: A. Community Development - Planning Division: Sandy Baily at 354-6873 B. Engineering/Parks & Public Works Department: Fletcher Parsons at 395- 3460 C. Santa Clara County Fire Department: (408) 378-4010 D. Environmental Health Department: (408) 885-4200 22. *ARCHAELOGICAL. In the event archaeological traces are encountered, all construction within a 50 meter radius of the find shall be halted, the Director of Community Development shall be notified and an archaeologist shall be retained to examine the find and make appropriate recommendations. 23. *NATIVE AMERICAN REMAINS. If human remains are discovered, the Santa Clara County Coroner shall immediately be notified. The Coroner will determine whether or not the remains were Native American. If the Coroner determines that the remains are not subject to his or her authority, the Coroner shall notify the Native American Heritage Commission, who would attempt to identify descendants of the deceased Native American. 24. *ARCHAEOLOGICAL FIND. If the Director of Community Development finds that the archaeological find is not a significant resource, work will resume only after the submittal of a preliminary archaeological report and after provision for reburial and ongoing monitoring are accepted. Provisions for identifying descendants of a deceased Native American and for reburial will follow the protocol set forth in Section 15064.5 of the CEQA Guidelines. If the site is found to be a significant archaeological site, a mitigation program must be prepared and submitted to the Director of Community Development for consideration and approval, in conformance with the protocol set forth in Public Resources Code Section 21083.2. 25. *FINAL ARCHAEOLOGICAL REPORT. A final report shall be prepared at the applicant's cost when a find is determined to be a significant archaeological site and/or when Native American remains are found on the site. The final report shall include background information on the completed work, a description and list of identified resources, the disposition and curation of these resources, any testing, other recovered information, and conclusions. 26. *LEAD-BASED PAINT. A state certified lead-based paint professional shall be retained to perform a lead-based paint survey of the existing structures and the recommendations of the professional shall be followed for abatement of any identified lead-based paint prior to renovation of the structure. TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE DIRECTOR OF PARKS AND PUBLIC WORKS: (Engineering Division) 27. ABOVE GROUND UTILITIES. The applicant shall submit a 75-percent progress printing to the Town for review of above ground utilities including backflow prevention devices, fire department connections, gas and water meters, off-street valve boxes, hydrants, site lighting, electrical/communication/cable boxes, transformers, and mail boxes. Above ground utilities shall be reviewed and approved by Community Development prior to issuance of any permit. 28. GRADING PERMIT. A grading permit is required for site grading and drainage. The grading permit application (with grading plans) shall be made to the Engineering Division of the Parks & Public Works Department located at 41 Miles Avenue. The grading plans shall include final grading, drainage, retaining wall location, driveway, utilities and interim erosion control. Grading plans shall list earthwork quantities and a table of existing and proposed impervious areas. Unless specifically allowed by the Director of Parks and Public Works, the grading permit will be issued concurrently with the building permit. The grading permit is for work outside the building footprint(s). A separate building permit, issued by the Building Department on E. Main Street is needed for grading within the building footprint. 29. TREE REMOVAL. Copies of all necessary tree removal permits shall be provided prior to issuance of a grading permit. 30. SOILS ENGINEER CONSTRUCTION OBSERVATION. During construction, all excavations and grading shall be inspected by the applicant's soils engineer prior to placement of concrete and/or backfill so they can verify that the actual conditions are as anticipated in the design-level geotechnical report, and recommend appropriate changes in the recommendations contained in the report, if necessary. The results of the construction observation and testing should be documented in an "as-built" letter/report prepared by the applicants' soils engineer and submitted to the Town before final release of any occupancy permit is granted. 31. PAD CERTIFICATION. A letter from a licensed land surveyor shall be provided stating that the building foundation was constructed in accordance with the approved plans shall be provided subsequent to foundation construction and prior to construction on the structure. The pad certification shall address both vertical and horizontal foundation placement. 32. PRECONSTRUCTION MEETING. Prior to issuance of any permit or the commencement of any site work, the general contractor shall: a. Along with the project applicant, attend a pre-construction meeting with the Town Engineer to discuss the project conditions of approval, working hours, site maintenance and other construction matters; b. Acknowledge in writing that they have read and understand the project conditions of approval, and will make certain that all project sub-contractors have read and understand them prior to commencing work and that a copy of the project conditions of approval will be posted on site at all times during construction. 33. SOILS REPORT. One copy of the soils report shall be submitted with the grading permit application. The soils report shall include specific criteria and standards governing site grading, drainage, pavement design, retaining wall design and erosion control. The reports shall be signed and "wet stamped" by the engineer or geologist, in conformance with Section 6735 of the California Business and Professions Code. 34. SOILS REVIEW. Prior to issuance of any permit, the applicant's soils engineer shall review the final grading and drainage plans to ensure that designs for foundations, retaining walls, site grading, and site drainage are in accordance with their recommendations and the peer review comments. The applicant's soils engineer's approval shall then be conveyed to the Town either by letter or by signing the plans. 35. GENERAL. All public improvements shall be made according to the latest adopted Town Standard Drawings and the Town Standard Specifications. All work shall conform to the applicable Town ordinances. The adjacent public night- of-way shall be kept clear of all job related dirt and debris at the end of the day. Dirt and debris shall not be washed into storm drainage facilities. The storing of goods and materials on the sidewalk and/or the street will not be allowed unless a special permit is issued. The developer's representative in charge shall be at the job site during all working hours. Failure to maintain the public right-of-way according to this condition may result in the Town performing the required maintenance at the developer's expense. 36. ENCROACHMENT PERMIT. All work in the public right-of-way will require a Construction Encroachment Permit. All work over $5,000 will require construction security. 37. PUBLIC WORKS INSPECTIONS. The developer or his representative shalt notify the Engineering Inspector at least twenty-four (24) hours before starting any work pertaining to on-site drainage facilities, grading or paving, and all work in the Town's right-of-way. Failure to do so will result in rejection of work that went on without inspection. 38. EROSION CONTROL. Interim and final erosion control plans shall be prepared and submitted to the Engineering Division of the Parks & Public Works Department. A Notice of Intent (NOI) and Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) shall be submitted to the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board for projects disturbing more than one acre. A maximum of two weeks is allowed between clearing of an area and stabilizing/building on an area if grading is allowed during the rainy season. Interim erosion control measures, to be carried Dirt during construction and before installation of the final landscaping shall be included. Interim erosion control method shall include, but are not limited to: silt fences, fiber rolls (with locations and details), erosion control blankets, Town standard seeding specification, filter berms, check dams, retention basins, etc. Provide erosion control measures as needed to protect downstream water quality during winter months. The grading, drainage, erosion control plans and SWPPP shall be in compliance with applicable measures contained in the amended provisions C.3 and C.14 of Order No. R2-2005-0035 of the amended Santa Clara County NPDES Permit. 39. DUST CONTROL. Blowing dust shall be reduced by timing construction activities so that paving and building construction begin as soon as possible after completion of grading, and by landscaping disturbed soils as soon as possible. Further, water trucks shall be present and in use at the construction site. All portions of the site subject to blowing dust shall be watered as often as deemed necessary by the Town, or a minimum of three times daily, or apply (non-toxic) soil stabilizers on all unpaved access roads, parking areas, and staging areas at construction sites in order to insure proper control of blowing dust for the duration of the project. Watering on public streets shall not occur. Streets will be cleaned by street sweepers or by hand as often as deemed necessary by the Town Engineer, or at least once a day. Watering associated with on-site construction activity shall take place between the hours of 8 a.m. and 5 p.m. and shall include at least one late-afternoon watering to minimize the effects of blowing dust. All public streets soiled or littered due to this construction activity shall be cleaned and swept on a daily basis during the workweek to the satisfaction of the Town. Demolition or earthwork activities shall be halted when wind speeds (instantaneous gusts) exceed 25 MPH. All trucks hauling soil, sand, or other loose debris shall be covered. 40. CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT PLAN. The Applicant shall submit a construction management plan that shall incorporate at a minimum the Earth Movement Plan, Traffic Control Plan, Project Schedule, site security fencing, employee parking, construction staging area, construction trailer, and proposed outhouse locations. 41. CONSTRUCTION STREET PARKING. Any reservation of street parking shall be coordinated with the Police Department. Contractors shall not use public parking unless previously arranged through the Police and Engineering Departments. 42. SITE DRAINAGE. Rainwater leaders shall be discharged to splash blocks. No through curb drains will be allowed. 43. NPDES. On-site drainage systems shall include a filtration device such as a bio- swale or permeable pavement. 44. SILT AND MUD IN PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY. It is the responsibility of contractor and home owner to make sure that all dirt tracked into the public right- of-way is cleaned up on a daily basis. Mud, silt, concrete and other construction debris SHALL NOT be washed into the Town's storm drains. 45. RESTORATION OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS. The developer shall repair or. replace all existing improvements not designated for removal that are damaged or removed because of developer's operations. Improvements such as, but not limited to: curbs, gutters, sidewalks, driveways, signs, pavements, raised pavement markers, thermoplastic pavement markings, etc. shall be repaired and replaced to a condition equal to or better than the original condition. Existing improvement to be repaired or replaced shall be at the direction of the Engineering Construction Inspector, and shall comply with all Title 24 Disabled Access provisions. Developer shall request a walk-through with the Engineering Construction Inspector before the start of construction to verify existing conditions. 46. SIDEWALK REPAIR. The developer shall repair and replace to existing Town standards any sidewalk damaged now or during construction of this project. Sidewalk repair shall match existing color, texture and design, and shall be constructed per Town Standard Details. The limits of sidewalk repair will be determined by the Engineering Construction Inspector during the construction phase of the project. 47. CURB AND GUTTER. The developer shall repair and replace to existing Town standards any curb and gutter damaged now or during construction of this project. New curb and gutter shall be constructed per Town Standard Details. The limits of curb and gutter repair will be determined by the Engineering Construction Inspector during the construction phase of the project. 48. AS-BUILT PLANS. An AutoCAD disk of the approved "as-built" plans shall be provided to the Town prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. The AutoCAD file shall include only the following information and shall conform to the layer naming convention: a) Building Outline, Layer: BLDG-OUTLINE; b) Driveway, Layer: DRIVEWAY; c) Retaining Wall, Layer: RETAINING WALL; d) Swimming Pool, Layer: SWIMMING-POOL; e) Tennis Court, Layer: TENNIS-COURT; f) Property Line, Layer: PROPERTY-LINE; g) Contours, Layer: NEWCONTOUR. All as-built digital files must be on the same coordinate basis as the Town's survey control network and shall be submitted in AutoCAD version 2000 or higher. 49. SANITARY SEWER LATERAL. Sanitary sewer laterals are televised by West Valley Sanitation District and approved by the Town of Los Gatos before they are used or reused. Install a sanitary sewer lateral clean-out at the property line. 50. SANITARY SEWER BACKWATER VALVE. Drainage piping serving fixtures which have flood level rims less than twelve (12) inches (304.8 mm) above the elevation of the next upstream manhole and/or flushing inlet cover at the public or private sewer system serving such drainage piping shall be protected from backflow of sewage by installing an approved type backwater valve. Fixtures above such elevation shall not discharge through the backwater valve, unless first approved by the Administrative (Sec. 6.50.025). The Town shall not incur any liability or responsibility for damage resulting from a sewer overflow where the property owner or other person has failed to install a backwater valve, as defined section 103(e) of the Uniform Plumbing Code adopted by section 6.5 of the Town Code and maintain such device in a functional operating condition. Evidence of West Valley Sanitation District's decision on whether a backwater device is needed shall be provided prior to issuance of a building permit. 5i. OUTDOOR TRASH ENCLOSURES. Outdoor trash enclosures shall be covered and area drains connected to the sanitary sewer system shall be provided. Temporary trash enclosures are exempt from this condition. 52. GREASE TRAPS. Meet all requirement of the Santa Clara County Health Department and West Valley Sanitation District for the interception, separation or pretreatment of effluent. 53. CONSTRUCTION NOISE. Between the hours of 8:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m., weekdays and 9:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. weekends and holidays, construction, alteration or repair activities shall be allowed. No individual piece of equipment shall produce a noise level exceeding eighty-five (85) dBA at twenty-five (25) feet. If the device is located within a structure on the property, the measurement shall be made at distances as close to twenty-five (25) feet from the device as possible. The noise level at any point outside of the property plane shall not exceed eighty-five (85) dBA. 54. GOOD HOUSEKEEPING. Good housekeeping practices shall be observed at all times during the course of construction. Superintendence of construction shall be diligently performed by a person or persons authorized to do so at all times during working hours. The storing of goods and/or materials on the sidewalk and/or the street will not be allowed unless a special permit is issued by the Engineering Division. 55. TRUCKING and UNLOADING. Trucking and unloading shall be coordinated with the Engineering inspector. Haul routes, temporary blocking of parking or streets, and delivery times shall be coordinated with the Engineering inspector. 56. *GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION. A geotechnical investigation shall be conducted for this project to determine the potential for surface fault rupture on the site. The geotechnical study shall provide recommendations for site grading as well as the design of foundations, retaining walls, concrete slab-on-grade construction, excavation, drainage, on-site utility trenching and pavement sections. The project shall incorporate all recommendations of the investigation into project plans. TO THE SATISFACTION OF SANTA CLARA COUNTY FIRE 57. FIRE FLOW. Buildings requiring a fire flow in excess of 2,000 GPM shall be protected throughout by an automatic fire sprinkler system, hydraulically designed per National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) Standard #13. 58. PLAN SUBMITTAL. A State of California licensed fire protection contractor shall submit plans, calculations, a completed permit application and appropriate fees to this department for review and approval prior to beginning their work. 59. PREMISE IDENTIFICATION. Approved numbers or addresses shall be placed on all new and existing buildings in such a position as to be plainly visible and legible from the street or road fronting the property. Numbers shall contrast with their background. *Required as a Mitigation Measure N:\DEV\C0NDITNSM08\nsc 115.a&s.doc CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 115 N. Santa Cruz Avenue and 112 Wilder Avenue Negative Declaration ND-07-10 Subdivision Application M-07-005 General Plan Amendment GP-07-01 Zone Change Z-07-001 Architecture and Site Application S-07-019 Conditional Use Permit U-07-020 Variance Application V-07-01 Requesting approval of 1) a lot line adjustment, 2) a General Plan amendment from Medium Density Residential to Central Business for a portion of the parking lot parcel, 3) a zone change from R-1D:LHP to C-2:LHP for a portion of the parking lot parcel, 4) conversion of an existing fine dining restaurant into a smaller fine dining restaurant on the first floor and office space on the second floor, 5) two new detached commercial buildings, 6) modification to the exterior of the existing commercial building, and 7) conversion of the existing parking lot which fronts on Wilder Avenue to a residential lot, on properties zoned C-2:LHP and R-1D:LHP. No significant environmental impacts have been identified as a result of this project, and a Mitigated Negative Declaration is recommended. APN 510-17-065 and 071 PROPERTY OWNER: Santa Cruz Wilder, LLC APPLICANT: John Lien TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE PLANNING DIRECTOR: (Planning Division) I. EXPIRATION: Zoning approval will expire two years from the approval date pursuant to Section 29.20.320 of the Town Code, unless the approval has been vested. 2. RESTAURANT USE: A high quality restaurant and full service bar is permitted on the first floor and the basement. 3. HOURS: Maximum hours of operation for the inside restaurant and bar shall be 11 AM to I AM weekdays and 9 AM to 1 AM Saturday and Sunday. Maximum hours of operation for the outside seating area shall be the same except that alcohol service shall not go past 11 PM Sunday through Thursday, except for holidays and evenings before holidays. 4. SEATS. The maximum number of seats (inside and outside combined) shall not exceed 135. 5. ALCOHOL SERVICE: The service of alcohol for the restaurant dining area (inside and outside) is permitted only with meals. A meal is defined as a combination of food items selected from a menu (breakfast, brunch, lunch, or EXHIBIT 7 dinner). Appetizers such as popcorn, nachos, pretzels, potato skins, relish trays, etc. (hot or cold) are not meals. 6. DELIVERIES: Deliveries shall be no earlier than 7:00 a.m. 7. PORCH AREA: No chairs shall be in the porch area. TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE DIRECTOR OF PARKS AND PUBLIC WORKS (Public Works Section) 8. GREASE TRAPS: Meet all requirements of the County Health Department and West Valley Sanitation District for the interception, separation, or pretreatment of effluent. TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE CHIEF OF POLICE: 9. GENERAL: The restaurant is subject to the following: a. Uniformed privately provided security guards may be required in or around the premises by the Chief of Police if alcohol related problems recur that are not resolved by the licensed owner. b. At the discretion of the Chief of Police, periodic meetings will be conducted with representatives from the Police Department for on-going employee training on alcoholic beverage service to the general public. C. All establishments shall use an employee training manual that addresses alcoholic beverage service consistent with the standards of the California Restaurant Association. _ d. All licensed operators shall have and shall actively promote a designated driver program such as complimentary non-alcoholic beverages for designated drivers. e. Taxicab telephone numbers shall be posted in a visible location. f. A restaurant employee shall seat patrons in the outside dining area. N ADEWONDITNSMOMnsc 115. cup, doc INITIAL STUDY 115 NORTH SANTA CRUZ AVENUE AND 112 WILDER AVENUE LOS GATOS, CALIFORNIA SUBDIVISION APPLICATION M-07-005 GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT GP-07-01 ZONE CHANGE Z-07-001 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT U-07-020 VARIANCE APPLICATION V-07-01 NEGATIVE DECLARATION ND-07-10 PREPARED FOR TOWN OF Los GATOS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 110 E. MAIN STREET Los GATOS, CA 95030 a DECEMBER 2007 J~ G k 2007 PREPARED BY GEIER & GEIER CONSULTING, INC. P.O. Box 5054 BERKELEY, CA 94705-5054 510/644-2535 EXHIBIT 8 TOWN OF LOS GATOS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM 1. Project Title: 115 North Santa Cruz Avenue and 112 Wilder Avenue Subdivision Application M-07-005, General Plan Amendment GP-07-01, Zone Change Z-07-001, Conditional Use Permit U-07-020, Variance Application V-07-01, Negative Declaration ND-07-10 2. Lead Agency Name and Address: Town of Los Gatos Community Development Department 110 East Main Street Los Gatos, CA 95031 3. Contact Person and Phone Number: Sandy Baily, 408/354-6873 4. Project Location: 115 North Santa Cruz Avenue (Figure 1) 5. Project Applicant's Name and Address: Santa Cruz Wilder, LLC 50 West San Fernando Street, #320 San Jose, CA 95113 6. General Plan Designation: North Santa Cruz Parcel (APN 510-17-065): Central Business District Wilder Parcel (APN 510-17-071): Medium Density Residential, 5-12 du/acre 7. Zoning: North Santa Cruz Parcel (APN 510-17-065): C-2:LHP, Central Business District Commercial Zone with Landmark and Historic Preservation Overlay Zone Wilder Parcel (APN 510-17-071): R-1D:LHP, Single-Family Residential Downtown Zone with Landmark and Historic Preservation Overlay Zone 8. Description of Project: The project site is comprised of two parcels totaling 25,476 square feet (s.f.) or 0.59 acre (North Santa Cruz Parcel: 14,230 s.f.; Wilder Parcel: 11,246 s.f.). The project applicant is requesting approval of the following: Lot Line Adjustment (Subdivision Application): Adjust the rear lot line of the North Santa Cruz parcel to include a portion of the Wilder parcel so that parking spaces serving the existing and proposed commercial uses on the North Santa Cruz parcel would be located on this same parcel. The North Santa Cruz parcel would be enlarged to 18,101 s.f. (0.42 acre), while the Wilder parcel would be reduced to 7,375 s.f. (0.17 acre). ■ General Plan Amendment and Zone Change: Amend the General Plan from Low Density Residential to Central Business District and the Zoning Ordinance from R-1 D:LHP to C-2:LHP for the portion of the Wilder parcel that would become part of the North Santa Cruz parcel and used for parking. DECEMBER, 2007 PROJECT LOCATION 0115 NORTH SANTA CRUZ AVENUE AND 112 WILDER AVENUE FIGURE 1 NO SCALE *N INITIAL STUDY - 115 NORTH SANTA CRUZ AVENUE AND 112 WILDER AVENUE ■ Convert Existing Parking Lot to Residential Lot (Variance Application): Convert the existing parking lot located on the Wilder parcel to a residential lot, currently designated in the General Plan as Medium Density Residential and zoned C-2:LHP and R-ID:LHP. Such conversion would remove 13 on-site parking spaces used in the Parking Assessment District calculations. ■ Modify Use of Existing Coggeshall Mansion and Add Two Commercial Buildings (Conditional Use Permit): Convert an existing fine dining restaurant into a smaller fine dining restaurant on the first floor and office space on the second floor; add two detached commercial buildings in front (east) of the existing structure on the North Santa Cruz parcel; and modify the exterior of the existing historic structure. On the North Santa Cruz parcel, these approvals would allow for addition of two, single-story, detached commercial buildings along the North Santa Cruz Avenue property frontage.. The proposed South Building would be 1,176 square feet and located in the southeast corner of the North Santa Cruz parcel. The proposed North Building would be 424 square feet and located on this parcel's northeast comer. In addition to the two new buildings, the interior of the existing Coggeshall Mansion would be modified to allow for reduction in the existing restaurant and conversion of the second floor to office space. There would also be minor changes to the exterior of the mansion (e.g., add new canvas awning, replace existing windows with French doors, and replace existing portico, deck and stairs with new dining deck and stairs on the front of the mansion; replace existing window with exit door and stairs on the rear of the building). The proposed Lot Line Adjustment would expand this parcel so that the existing six parking spaces would be located on the same parcel and four more spaces would be added for a total of 10 parking spaces. The existing trash enclosure would be relocated to the east to accommodate these three additional spaces. On the Wilder parcel, these approvals would allow removal of the existing parking lot, which currently provides 16 parking spaces and the trash enclosure, and future development of a single- family residence. The proposed plan indicates that a two-car garage for the residence and two guest spaces (located east of the garage) would be located on the east end of this parcel, adjacent to the alleyway. 9. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: The 0.59-acre project site consists of two adjacent parcels, one fronts on North Santa Cruz Avenue and extends westward to Wilder Avenue, spanning the alleyway located mid-block. The project's eastern parcel fronts onto North Santa Cruz Avenue (North Santa Cruz parcel), while the western parcel fronts onto Wilder Avenue (Wilder parcel). The alleyway currently extends along the adjoining boundary of these two parcels. The North Santa Cruz parcel is developed with the historic Coggeshall Mansion, which is occupied by the Trevese Restaurant and Lounge. The Wilder Avenue parcel is currently developed as a parking lot that provides on-site parking for the Trevese Restaurant. The North Santa Cruz parcel is bounded by North Santa Cruz Avenue on the east, the alleyway on the west, and retail commercial uses on the north and south (U.S. Bank and Designs & Interiors of Los Gatos, respectively). Retail commercial uses are located across North Santa Cruz Avenue to. the east of the project site. The Wilder parcel is bounded by Wilder Avenue on the west, the alleyway on the east, and single-family residences to the north and south. Pedestrian access to the Coggeshall Mansion is available from North Santa Cruz Avenue on the east and the alleyway on the west. Since there are no parking facilities on the North Santa Cruz parcel, vehicular access is limited to the alleyway, off-street parking on the Wilder parcel, and on-street parking on North Santa Cruz Avenue. Vehicular access to the Wilder parcel is available from Wilder Avenue as well as the alleyway. DECEMBER, 2007 INITIAL STUDY - 115 NORTH SANTA CRUZ AVENUE AND 112 WILDER AVENUE 10. Other agencies whose approval is required (e.g., permits, financing approval, or participation agreements): None. Environmental Factors Potentially Affected: The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages: Aesthetics Agriculture Resources Air Quality X Biological Resources X Cultural Resources X Geology/Soils X Hazards & Hazardous Materials Hydrology/Water Quality Land Use/Planning Mineral Resources Noise Population/Housing Public Services Recreation Transportation/Traffic Utilities/Service Systems Mandatory Findings of Significance Determination: (to be Completed by the Lead Agency) On the basis of this initial evaluation: I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. X I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. I find that the proposed project MAY have a "potentially significant impact" or "potentially significant unless mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project, nothing further is required. Bud N. Lortz, Director of lAmmuDevelopment 12 Date DECEMBER, 2007 4 INITIAL STUDY - 115 NORTH SANTA CRUZ AVENUE AND 112 WILDER AVENUE Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Issues: Potentially Significant Potentially Impact Unless Less Than Issues (and Supporting Information Sources) Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact 1. Aesthetics - Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? X b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings X within a state scenic highway? c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or X quality of the site and its surroundings? d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare which X would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? The project would involve a lot line adjustment for two adjoining parcels fronting on Wilder and North Santa Cruz avenues, with the development of a new residential structure and garage on the Wilder Avenue parcel currently used for parking. The design plans for the new residence have not been formulated; however, the proposed project specifies a future garage and two guest parking spaces to be accessed from the alleyway separating the two parcels. The project plans propose the construction of two new single-story, retail commercial buildings in the front yard area of the Coggeshall Mansion property on North Santa Cruz Avenue. The planned commercial structures would be located in the northeast and southeast corners of the North Santa Cruz parcel, with a remaining open garden area separating the two structures and providing partial views and access from North Santa Cruz Avenue to the restaurant use in the historic mansion. The South Building would be 1,176 square feet in size and have a maximum height of 15.5 feet above grade, while the North Building would be 424 square feet with a maximum height of 14 feet above grade. The proposed South Building height would be approximately similar to that of the commercial building (Design & Interiors of Los Gatos) adjoining the project site to the south along North Santa Cruz Avenue. The height of the North Building would be lower than that of the US Bank building adjoining the site to the north. In addition to the two new buildings, the interior of the existing Coggeshall Mansion would be modified to allow for reduction in the existing restaurant use and conversion of the second floor to office space. There would also be minor changes to the exterior of the mansion, e.g. the addition of new canvas awnings, replacement of existing windows with French doors, new exterior stairs on the west and north sides of the building, etc. An existing portico and deck used for dining would be replaced with a new dining deck between the existing mansion building and the proposed South Building. Views of the project site are primarily available from pedestrians and vehicles traveling along North Santa Cruz Avenue and Wilder Avenue, east and west of the subject parcels, respectively. Both parcels are visible from the alleyway separating the two subject parcels. The views from Wilder Avenue are of a parking lot with a background view of the Coggeshall Mansion's rear faqade. Views of the Coggeshall Mansion from North Santa Cruz Avenue constitute the principal visual resource of project site. The mansion is designated as a historical resource (No. HD-75-6) in Los Gatos since it represents a classic DECEMBER, 2007 INITIAL STUDY - 115 NORTH SANTA CRUZ AVENUE AND 112 WILDER AVENUE example of a Nineteenth Century Eastlake Victorian. It is the only remaining structure of many that once lined the west side of North Santa Cruz Avenue. In order to assess the potential effects of the proposed project on the visual character of the project site, the Town required a peer review of the project design plans by the Town's contract architectural consultant, Cannon Design Group (CDG). CDG reviewed the project plans and prepared a report (April 20,2007) detailing potential concerns with the design submitted to the Town and providing design options to address these issues. The peer review report did not address potential design issues for the residential component of the project plans since no specific residential design plans have been submitted to the Town. CDG made no firm recommendations for the modification of the project design, and noted that the aesthetic effects of the project's proposed design on the site's character and the mansion's historic setting were a matter of value judgments to be decided by Town staff, the Historical Preservation Committee, and the Planning Commission. The CDG report is included as Attachment 1 of this study. Briefly, the CDG review presented four options that would reduce the impacts of the project design as previously submitted to the Town. These include: 1) no project development; 2) limit additional commercial development to one structure; 3) reduce the North Building size; and 4) modify the design of the North Building. The project design was revised in response to the recommendations of the CDG peer review and submitted to the Town for further review and approval. The revised design included minor modification of the South Building, entailing the removal of a rooftop architectural element and a reconfiguration in the alignment of the North Building. The North Building was planned in an east - west orientation to permit more visibility of the Coggeshall Mansion from North Santa Cruz Avenue. CDG reviewed the revised design (September 24, 2007; included in Attachment 1) and concluded that while the design was much improved, there were still three concerns: ■ The roof form of the proposed South Building is very awkward at the south property boundary, with the odd angle to the end, partly a result of trying to achieve the maximum building square footage at an angled property line. In some cases that might be acceptable, but CDG indicates the historic quality of the Coggeshall Mansion deserves a more classic and complete design solution. CDG recommends that roof form relate more directly to the north end of this building, requiring some adjustment for the location and/or form of building element on the west side of this structure. ■ Proposed location of the entry gable so close to the south end of the building seems awkward and out of character for this type of structure. CDG recommends moving the entry northward, as indicated in the Recommendations diagram (Attachment 1). ■ CDG is concerned with the use of stucco for wall materials and recommends that strong consideration be given to the use of a wood frame and panel system for the walls, relating them strongly to the window system and the wood of the existing Coggeshall Mansion on the site. CDG recommends that the proposed building designs visually relate more to the historic mansion than to the adjacent stucco buildings. Views of the North Santa Cruz Avenue parcel and the Coggeshall Mansion would change from a full view of the estate structure and front yard landscaping to a partially obstructed view of the building. The proposed one-story South Building would block views of the mansion's single-story southern wing. The smaller North Building would be located in the northeast corner of the project site and its location and size would preserve views of the main entrance and two-story fagade of the mansion along the North Santa Cruz Avenue frontage. The protection of the historic structures' character and settings would be subject to the provisions of the Town's Commercial Design Guidelines and the Town Code pertaining to LHP properties. Page 6 of these DECEMBER, 2007 6 INITIAL STUDY - 115 NORTH SANTA CRUZ AVENUE AND 112 WILDER AVENUE guidelines, Designated Landmarks, indicates that Appendix C identifies Individual Historic Landmarks within commercial areas that are subject to these design guidelines. Appendix C, page 83 of these guidelines, lists HD-75-6, Coggeshall Mansion, 115 North Santa Cruz Avenue as one of the commercial buildings or properties that are not located within one of the Town's historic districts that have been designated as historical landmarks by the Town of Los Gatos. These guidelines contain a clear statement of community expectations to assist property and business owners in understanding the Town and commercial development features that assist in defining the overall ambience and sense of place that contribute so strongly-to the livability and economic vitality of Los Gatos. The guidelines are intended to establish a balance that preserves and enhances the Town's livability while supporting the economic vitality that provides the resources for community services and the uses that make Los Gatos a complete community. To assist the Town in its efforts to achieve a high level of design quality and preserve the historic design characteristics important to the community, the Town Municipal Code provides for a Historic Preservation Committee to advise the Planning Commission. The Historic Preservation Committee reviewed a preliminary project design on April 5, 2006 to determine whether the conceptual project design is consistent with the requirements of the Commercial Design Guidelines and goals of the Town for historic landmarks. At that time (April 5, 2006), the Committee provided direction for the project applicant to ensure that the proposed design complies with the goals and objectives for the preservation of the historic landmark property. In general, the comments of the Committee supported the conceptual project design. During meetings on March 21 and September 19, 2007, the Historic Preservation Committee considered plans for the proposed project and determined that development of two detached structures would be acceptable for the project site and had the following three comments regarding the proposed structures: ■ The southern structure should be redesigned to be more subservient (regarding style, scale and mass), to the mansion; ■ Consider a more transparent building; and ■ The context of the mansion shall be protected. Additionally, the Committee determined that the proposed exterior staircase on the mansion would be acceptable. Consequently, introduction of two new commercial buildings on the grounds of the project site would be considered to have a less-than-significant impact on the aesthetic character of the property. Further design review required by the Town for this project would enforce the historic preservation objectives as presented in the Town's Commercial Design Guidelines. Views of the project site's Wilder Avenue parcel are available from existing single-family residences located to the north, south, and west on Wilder Avenue. Current views of the existing parking lot would change to views of a single-family residence similar to those presently surrounding the site. The development of a two-story residence would obstruct existing views across the parking lot to the eastern (back) fagade of the Coggeshall Mansion. The replacement of existing parking lot and mansion views with views of a proposed residential building would be a less-than-significant change in the surrounding visual character. Visual compatibility of the proposed residence's design with surrounding development will be specifically evaluated during the Architecture and Site review process. DECEMBER, 2007 7 INITIAL STUDY - 115 NORTH SANTA CRUZ AVENUE AND 112 WILDER AVENUE Potentially Significant Potentially Impact Unless Less Than Issues (and Supporting Information Sources) Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact II. Agriculture Resources - Would the project: a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps X prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use? b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a X Williamson Act contract? c) Involve other changes in the existing environment which, X due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agri cultural use? The project site is developed with an existing historical structure that would be retained and remodeled for ongoing commercial use. Since the site is not in agricultural use and has no agricultural potential due to its small size, location, and existing use, the project would not adversely affect any existing agricultural resources or operations. Since the properties surrounding the project site are developed with commercial and residential uses, the proposed project would not adversely affect other agricultural properties or result in the conversion of farmland to non-agri cultural use. Potentially Significant Potentially Impact Unless Less Than Issues (and Supporting Information Sources) Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact III. Air Quality - Would the project: a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable X air quality plan? b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially X to an existing or projected air quality violation? c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any X criteria pollutant for which the project region is non- attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions, which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant X concentrations? e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number X of people? The project would be consistent with the Bay Area Air Quality Management District's (BAAQMD) most recently adopted regional air quality plan, the Bay Area 2005 Ozone Strategy (BAOS). The consistency of the proposed project with the BAOS is determined by comparing the project's consistency with the Los Gatos General Plan. Since the BAGS is based on population projections of the Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG) that are based on the Town's General Plan in effect at the time the BAGS was approved, consistency of the project with the General Plan would indicate consistency with the BROS. The proposed retail commercial, office, restaurant, and residential uses would be consistent with the uses DECEMBER, 2007 8 INITIAL STUDY - 115 NORTH SANTA CRUZ AVENUE AND 112 WILDER AVENUE allowed on the project site by the Los Gatos General Plan, and therefore, the project would be consistent with the BAGS. The San Francisco Bay Area Air Basin is classified by the BAAQMD as non-attainment for ozone and inhalable particulates (PM,,). According to the Town Engineering Division, the project would generate 471 average daily trips, 8 AM peak hour trips, and 44 PM peak hour trips, which would represent a net reduction in traffic generated at the project site on a daily basis and during the PM peak. Air pollutant emissions associated with the proposed project would likewise decrease and reduced traffic volumes would be below the Bay Area Air Quality Management District's (BAAQMD) threshold levels for potential significance.' The BAAQMD threshold levels for potential significance are approximately 2,000 vehicle trips per day or approximately 44,000 square feet of retail commercial space. At or above this size, traffic generated by a project could produce air quality problems, and an air quality impact assessment would need to be prepared and submitted to the BAAQMD for review. Adjacent residential uses are considered to be sensitive receptors. Proposed grading activities would generate short-term emissions of criteria pollutants, including suspended and inhalable particulate matter and equipment exhaust emissions. The project site is approximately 0.59 acre, and therefore, project implementation would result in surface disturbance of less than one acre. The BAAQMD does not require quantification of construction emissions, but considers any project's construction-related impacts to be less than significant if required dust-control measures are implemented. The Town's standard dust control conditions require implementation of the BAAQMD's standard dust control measures (required on sites of three acres or less), which would mitigate the project's construction-related air quality impacts to a less-than-significant level. Potentially Significant Potentially Impact Unless Less Than Issues (and Supporting Information Sources) Significant Mtigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact IV. Biological Resources - Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through X habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations,' or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or X other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected X wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native X resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? DECEMBER, 2007 9 INITIAL STUDY - 115 NORTH SANTA CRUZ AVENUE AND 112 WILDER AVENUE ssues (and Supporting Information Sources) Potentially Significant Impact Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact o Impact e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting X biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat X Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? The project site is a 0.59-acre property currently developed with a historical structure, landscaped grounds, and a parking lot. The area where the proposed retail commercial buildings would be located is currently developed with landscaping and paved walkways. Vegetation on the site consists of landscape trees, shrubs, and groundcover in the front and side yards of the property, and along the parking lot perimeter. The habitat value of site vegetation is limited to urban-adapted species. Policy O.P.3.3 of the Open Space Element of the Los Gatos General Plan emphasizes preservation of public and private landscaping along Town streets. The Los Gatos Tree Protection Ordinance states that the preferred tree replacement is two or more trees of a species and size designated by the Director of the Parks and Public Works Department. Tree replacement requirements are based on canopy size, which is defined in Table 3-1 of the Ordinance, Tree Canopy - Replacement Standard. Tree canopy replacement requirements range from two to six 24-inch box size trees or two 36-inch and/or 48-inch box size trees, depending on the canopy size of the tree to be removed. The Town retained Arbor Resources (AR) to conduct a tree inventory and review project plans to determine the project's compliance with the Town's Tree Protection Ordinance. This survey was completed in September 2007, and a copy of this report is included as Attachment 2. Arbor Resources' survey identified a total of 10 trees that could be affected by the proposed project, including pittosporum (Pittosporum eugenioides), holly oak (Quercus ilex), coast live oak (Quercus agrifolia), Canary Island date palm (Phoenix canariensis), and coast redwood (Sequoia sempervirens). These trees are either on the project site or in the right-of-way adjoining the site and could be vulnerable to potential damage during project development [Section 29.10.0995(B) of the Town's Municipal Code]. The 10 trees listed in the inventory are Protected Trees (trees with a trunk diameter of four inches or greater) as defined in Section 29.10.0960 of the Town Code. Of the 10 inventoried trees, seven trees (#l, 3, 5, 6, and 8 through 10) would need to be removed due to the project design and implementation. Arbor Resources indicates that proposed removal of the seven trees would be in accordance with Section 29.10.0990 (Standards of Review) of the Town's Municipal Code. In accordance with the Tree Protection Ordinance, Arbor Resources recommends planting of replacement trees to compensate for the loss of trees #3 and 5, a holly oak and date palm (both in fair to good condition). The other five trees to be removed were determined to be hazardous and no mitigation would be required. Pursuant to Section 29.10.0985 of the Town Code, the Parks and Public Works Department will determine specific replanting requirements for replacement trees. The arborist's study also identifies five river birch (Betulus nigra) trees situated in a row along the northern property boundary immediately north of the restaurant. These trees are all Ordinance-size, range in fair to good condition, and have trunk diameters ranging from 4 to 12 inches. A very large redwood DECEMBER, 2007 10 INITIAL STUDY - 115 NORTH SANTA CRUZ AVENUE AND 112 WILDER AVENUE with a trunk diameter of 39.5 inches and a canopy spread of 40 feet is located at the rear of the restaurant and appears to be in overall fair health. The Wilder Avenue parcel contains three small redwoods, two large redwoods, one laurel (Umbellularia californica), and one coast live oak on a neighboring site. While project plans avoid disturbance of these trees, the use of the Wilder Avenue property for construction access and staging could place these trees at risk. The Town will require implementation of the following measures to reduce impacts on trees to be retained and adequately replace trees to be removed: All recommendations made by Arbor Resources (September 21, 2007) shall be implemented to eliminate or minimize the construction-related impacts on the trees to be retained. Recommendations are listed under Section 4.0, Recommendations, of the arborist's report. These include recommendations under the Design Guidelines section (addressing tree location mapping, protective fencing, building setback, trenching, drainage facilities, and installation of new trees) and the Protection Measures Before and During Construction section (addressing fencing, removal of hardscape, demolition, work within tree canopies, etc.). The report's recommendations are included as Attachment 2. Potentially Significant Potentially Impact Unless Less Than issues (and Supporting Information Sources) Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact V. Cultural Resources - Would the project: a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a X historical resource as defined in 15064.5? b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of X an archaeological resource pursuant to 15064.5? c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological X resource or site or unique geologic feature? d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred X outside of formal cemeteries? The project site contains the Coggeshall Mansion, which was designated a historic landmark by the Town in 1975 (No. HD-75-6). The site is listed as a historically, architecturally, or aesthetically significant property since the mansion is: "almost classic example of Nineteenth Century Eastlake Victorian with the distinctive type of ornamentation that is the major characteristic of this style. Open front porch, tower, rows of spindles, and woodwork resembling furniture legs. Other distinguishing characteristics are the rectangular shape of the building, and the gable roof." The building was constructed as a residence in 1891. It was converted into a mortuary in 1920 and used as such until 1974. A building addition occurred in the 1970's. The building is presently used for commercial purposes as a restaurant. The structure is the only remaining building of this type that once lined the west side of North Santa Cruz Avenue between Saratoga Avenue and Main Street. Project implementation would result in the conversion of the structure's second story to commercial office use. The eastern portion of the project site is the landscaped front yard of the North Santa Cruz DECEMBER, 2007 11 INITIAL STUDY - 115 NORTH SANTA CRUZ AVENUE AND 112 WILDER AVENUE parcel, and contains landscaping as well as a dining deck, portico, and stairs. Portions of the front yard landscaping would be replaced with two new retail commercial structures as well as new landscaping and hardscape, i.e. walkways, patios, etc. The existing dining deck, portico, and stairs would be replaced with a new dining deck and stairs. The conservation of the Town's historic resources is the subject of the Town Code, Chapter 29 (Zoning Regulations), Sections 29.80.215 through 29.80.320. The purpose of the Historic Preservation and LHP or Landmark and Historic Preservation Overlay Zone is defined in Section 29.80.215(1) - (4). In brief, the Town seeks: "The protection, enhancement, perpetuation and use of structures, sites and areas that are reminders of past eras, events and persons important in local, State, or National history, or which provide significant examples of architectural styles of the past or are landmarks in the history of architecture, or which are unique and irreplaceable assets to the Town and its neighborhoods, or which provide for this and future generations examples of the physical surroundings in which past generations lived." To achieve these goals, Section 29.80.225 of the Town Municipal Code provides for the establishment and functioning of a Historic Preservation Committee. The Committee is composed of professional and lay members that have demonstrated knowledge, competence, or expertise in historic preservation, and acts as an advisory body to the Planning Commission on all matters pertaining to historic preservation. To ensure that the proposed project meets the requirements of the Town Zoning Code and all relevant guidelines, the Historic Preservation Committee reviewed a preliminary project design on April 5, 2006. At that time, the Committee provided direction for the project applicant to ensure that the proposed design complies with the goals and objectives for the preservation of the historic landmark property. In general, the comments of the Committee supported the conceptual project design. During meetings on March 21 and September 19, 2007, the Historic Preservation Committee considered plans for the proposed project and determined that development of two detached structures would be acceptable for the project site and had the following three comments regarding the proposed structures: ■ The southern structure should be redesigned to be more subservient (regarding style, scale and mass), to the mansion; ■ Consider a more transparent building; and ■ The context of the mansion shall be protected. Additionally, the Committee determined that the proposed exterior staircase on the mansion would be acceptable. Consequently, introduction of two new commercial buildings on the grounds of the project site would be considered to have a less than significant impact on the character of the historic landmark property. Further design review required by the Town for this project would enforce the historic preservation objectives as presented in the Town's Commercial Design Guidelines. The directions identified by the Historic Preservation Committee (April 5, 2006) for the proposed project are included in Attachment 3 of this study. Since, the project site is already developed, surface soils were disturbed during construction of existing development on the subject property in the late 19`h century. Although the site is not located adjacent to Los Gatos Creek, the potential for encountering cultural resources cannot be completely eliminated due to DECEMBER, 2007 12 INITIAL STUDY - 115 NORTH SANTA CRUZ AVENUE AND 112 WILDER AVENUE the site's historic character and relatively level topography. In addition, the project would potentially involve trenching for removal and/or relocation utility lines. Therefore, the following mitigation measures will be required: 2. In the event that archaeological traces are encountered, all construction within a 50-meter radius of the find shall be halted, the Community Development Director shall be notified, and an archaeologist shall be retained to examine the find and make appropriate recommendations. 3. If human remains are discovered, the Santa Clara County Coroner shall be notified. The Coroner shall determine whether or not the remains are Native American. If the Coroner determines that the remains are not subject to his authority, he shall notify the Native American Heritage Commission, who shall attempt to identify descendants of the deceased Native Americans. 4. If the Community Development Director finds that the archaeological find is not a significant resource, work may resume only after the submittal of a.preliminary archaeological report and after provisions for reburial and ongoing monitoring are accepted. Provisions for identifying descendants of a deceased Native American and for reburial shall follow the protocol set forth in CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5(e). If the site is found to be a significant archaeological site, a mitigation program shall be prepared and submitted to the Community Development Director for consideration and approval, in conformance with the protocol set forth in Public Resources Code Section 21083.2. 5. A final report shall be prepared when a find is determined to be a significant archaeological site, and/or when Native American remains are found on the site. The final report shall include background information on the completed work, a description and list of identified resources, the disposition and curation of these resources, any testing, other recovered information, and conclusions. Potentially Significant Potentially Impact Unless Less Than Issues (and Supporting Information Sources) Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact VI. Geology and Soils - Would the project expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: a) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the X most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. b) Strong seismic ground shaking? X c) Seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction? X d) Landslides? X e) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? X f) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that X would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? DECEMBER, 2007 13 INITIAL STUDY - 115 NORTH SANTA CRUZ AVENUE AND 112 WILDER AVENUE ssues (and Supporting Information Sources) Potentially Significant Impact Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Inco orated Less Than Significant Impact o Impact g) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of X the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property? h) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of X septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of waste water? A review of the Town's hazards maps' indicates that the project site has moderate shrink-swell potential, low potential for liquefaction, high potential for fault rupture, and moderate potential for seismic shaking. No debris flow hazards were identified for the site. The Town's Fault Map indicates that the site is located in an area of "concentration of coseismic ground deformation" and lineation indicative of faulting (linear depression) is mapped as traversing the site.3 The Town's hazards maps also indicate the site has a slight to moderate erosion hazard. The proposed grading plan indicates approximately 64 cubic yards would be graded (average depth of seven inches) to achieve a two percent slope across the proposed plaza. Town Conditions of Approval will include preparation and implementation of interim and final erosion control plans, which will reduce potential erosion hazards to less than significant. At a minimum, the proposed retail commercial buildings would be expected to be subject to strong ground shaking during their design life. However, it should be noted that most of the Bay Area as well as surrounding residences are subject to ground shaking hazards. As a standard project condition, the Town will require preparation of a soil engineering report; this report will address any soil engineering constraints and specify criteria and standards in accordance with the Uniform Building Code (UBC) for site grading, drainage, pavement design, retaining wall design, erosion control, and foundation design. Assuming all recommendations of this required report are incorporated into the project design, no significant impacts from soil engineering constraints would be anticipated. By implementing applicable UBC requirements and sound engineering practices, the Los Gatos General Plan EIR determined that proposed development would be at no higher risk of potentially significant impacts due to seismically- induced ground failure from seismic shaking than any other similarly situated area. However, due to the identified high potential for fault rupture, the following measure will be required to reduce potential ground rupture and related seismic impacts to a less-than-significant level: 6. A geotechnieal investigation shall be conducted for this project to determine the surface and subsurface soil conditions at the site, as well as to determine the potential for surface fault rupture on the site, particularly with respect to proposed building locations. The geotechnieal study shall provide recommendations for site grading as well as the design of foundations, retaining walls, concrete slab-on-grade construction, excavation, drainage, on-site utility trenching and pavement sections. The project shall incorporate all recommendations of the investigation into project plans. VII. Hazards and Hazardous Materials - Would the project: a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment X through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? DECEMBER, 2007 14 INITIAL STUDY - 115 NORTH SANTA CRUZ AVENUE AND 112 WILDER AVENUE Potentially Significant Potentially Impact Unless Less Than Issues (and Supporting Information Sources) Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Inco orated Impact Impact b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment X through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely X hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one- quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of X hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, X where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would X the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an X adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, X injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? The project site is currently developed with a historic structure, parking lot, and landscaping. Historic records indicate the building was constructed in 1891. From 1891 to 1920, the building was a residence; in 1920, it was converted to a mortuary and used for this purpose until 1974. The building received its historic landmark designation in 1975 and has been used since that time for commercial activities, including its current use as a restaurant. The former mortuary use could be a potential environmental concern due to any accidental release of the chemicals used for mortuary procedures. Since these chemicals were not used on the property after conversion of the building for other commercial purposes in 1975, and there were no reported incidences of chemicals being encountered during construction of subsequent modifications on the site, the potential presence of these chemicals on the site would not appear to be a significant environmental concern at this time.' The second story of the historic mansion would be remodeled to accommodate proposed commercial office uses. If the structure contains asbestos or lead-containing paint, renovation could result in airborne release of hazardous building materials, such as asbestos fibers or lead dust. Proposed renovation will be required to comply with state and federal regulations for inspection and removal of hazardous building materials, including asbestos-containing materials and lead-containing substances. If found to be present DECEMBER, 2007 15 INITIAL STUDY - 115 NORTH SANTA CRUZ AVENUE AND 112 WILDER AVENUE in building materials to be removed, asbestos and/or lead abatement practices such as containment and removal would be required prior to renovation. In addition, the project applicant will be required to obtain clearance for asbestos removal from the Bay Area Air Quality Management District prior to issuance of a demolition permit. Therefore, with implementation of existing regulations, the potential for public health hazards associated with the release of airborne asbestos fibers at the project site would be less than significant. In addition to implementing asbestos abatement requirements, the project sponsor will be required to implement the following additional measure to mitigate other public health risks associated with lead-based paints to a less-than-significant level: 7. A state certified lead-based paint professional shall be retained to perform a lead-based paint survey of the existing structure and the recommendations of the professional shall be followed for abatement of any identified lead-based paint prior to renovation of the structure. Potentially Significant Potentially Impact Unless Less Than Issues (and Supporting Information Sources) Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact VIII. Hydrology and Water Quality - Would the project: a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge X requirements? b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere X substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site X or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site? d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site X or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner, which would result in flooding on- or off-site? e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the X capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? X g) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as X mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? h) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures, which X would impede or redirect flood flows? DECEMBER, 2007 16 INITIAL STUDY - 115 NORTH SANTA CRUZ AVENUE AND 112 WILDER AVENUE Potentially Significant Potentially Impact Unless Less Than issues (and Supporting Information Sources) Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, X injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? X Storm Drainage. Presently, the 0.59-acre (25,476 square feet) project site is developed with commercial uses and a parking lot. Existing facilities and paving on the North Santa Cruz Avenue parcel cover 11,763 square feet, approximately 83% of the site. The project site is a level parcel with storm runoff draining from the property as sheet flows to North Santa Cruz Avenue and the alleyway behind the building. Runoff flows on North Santa Cruz Avenue enter the municipal storm drain system through catch basins along the street, and are collected and conveyed by the street's storm drain. Overland flows in the alleyway drain toward Nicholson Avenue and enter the municipal storm drain system north of the project site. Storm water runoff from the project site's impervious surfaces flows into the Town of Los Gatos storm drain system, discharging into Los Gatos Creek, and ultimately draining northward into San Francisco Bay. The project plans indicate that the proposed development would increase impervious surfaces from existing levels to 13,286 square feet, resulting in total coverage of approximately 93 percent of the site. Based on the design plans, the proposed project would increase impervious coverage by approximately 10 percent. However, it should be noted that the project site's Wilder parcel is extensively paved for parking lot use with minor landscape areas along the perimeter of the parcel. These existing impervious surfaces would be removed as part of the residential development proposed for this site and partially replaced with the impervious surfaces of the residential structure. The removal of impervious parking lot surfaces for future front, side, and rear yard landscaped areas would partially offset the new impervious surface area associated with the proposed commercial structures on the North Santa Cruz Avenue parcel Consequently, the project design would result in a negligible change in the amount of impervious surfaces on the project site overall. Since existing downstream storm drain facilities adequately accommodate current storm runoff flows and the proposed project would result in minimal increases in peak surface flows at the site, the proposed project would not affect the existing storm drainage system capacities and would have no significant adverse impacts on runoff flows from the project site. Flood Hazards. According to Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps for the project area, the project site is not within the 100-year floodplain. The Santa Clara Valley Water District's Maps of flood control facilities and limits of one percent flooding as well as the Town of Los Gatos Safety Element Flood Plain maps show the project site does not lie within a flood zone. Therefore, no significant flood hazard impacts would be anticipated. Water Quality. More stringent water quality regulations of the Clean Water Act have recently been triggered because the NPDES (National Pollution Discharge Elimination System) permit program has failed to protect beneficial uses of Santa Clara County's creeks and the South San Francisco Bay, as evidenced by such observations as violations of ambient water quality criteria, high concentrations of toxic substances, and fish consumption health advisories. These new regulations require that all discharges shall comply with Provision C.3, New and Redevelopment Performance Standards of Order No. 01-024 of the NPDES permit program. DECEMBER, 2007 17 INITIAL STUDY - 115 NORTH SANTA CRUZ AVENUE AND 112 WILDER AVENUE The project site is located within the Los Gatos Creek watershed. Runoff from the site would discharge to the Town's storm drains in Santa Cruz Avenue, flowing into Los Gatos Creek and eventually into the Bay. Los Gatos Creek is on the Clean Water Act Section 303(d) List of Water Quality Limited Segments due to the presence of diazinon, a pesticide, and its primary source is identified as urban runoff and storm drains. Best Management Practices (BMPs) outlined by the Santa Clara Valley Urban Runoff Pollution Prevention Program (SCV URPPP) for treatment control of pesticides include bioretention, infiltration, and media filter with adsorption/absorption as the removal process. As a condition of project approval, the Town will require: (1) preparation and submittal of interim and final erosion control plans to the Engineering Division of the Parks and Public Works Department; and (2) implementation of non-point source pollution prevention measures to reduce pollutant levels in the water that will eventually discharge to Los Gatos Creek. Since the project would create or replace less than 10,000 square feet of impervious surface area, the Town has determined that the proposed project is not subject to the provisions of C.3. However, the Town will require surface runoff to be directed into landscaped areas and splash blocks to be installed on downspouts. These requirements are consistent with current non-point source requirements and erosion control portions of the NPDES permit program. Potentially Significant Potentially Impact Unless Less Than Issues (and Supporting Information Sources) Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact IX. Land Use and Planning - Would the project: a) Physically divide an established community? X b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or X regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or X natural community conservation plan? The project site is currently developed with a historic structure, paved parking lot, and landscaping. The North Santa Cruz parcel is currently designated by the General Plan as "CBD - Central Business District" while the Wilder parcel is designated "Medium Density Residential, 5 to 12 dwelling units per acre." The CBD General Plan designation encourages "a mixture of community-oriented commercial goods, services and lodging, that is unique in its accommodation of small town style merchants and the maintenance of a small town feel and character" This designation also calls for maintaining and expanding landscaped open spaces and mature tree growth without increasing setbacks, and integrating new construction with existing structures of historical or architectural significance and emphasizes the importance of the pedestrian. The Medium Density Residential General Plan designation provides for multiple-family residential, duplex, and/or small single-family homes. The proposed development of retail commercial and office space on the North Santa Cruz parcel and a single-family residence on the Wilder parcel would appear to be consistent with these designations. However, the project proposal would modify lot lines so that the parking spaces associated with the North Santa Cruz parcel would become part of this parcel, requiring a General Plan amendment from "Medium Density Residential" to "Central Business District" on the portion of the site where parking spaces would be located. The North Santa Cruz parcel is zoned C-2:LHP, Central Business District Commercial Zone with Landmark and Historic Preservation Overlay Zone. Permitted uses in the C-2 Zone include retail DECEMBER, 2007 18 INITIAL STUDY - 115 NORTH SANTA CRUZ AVENUE AND 112 WILDER AVENUE commercial, personal service business, and office activities. The Wilder parcel is zoned R-1D:LHP, Single-Family Residential Zone, with Landmark and Historic Preservation Overlay Zone. Permitted uses in the R-1 Zone include single-family dwellings, residential care facilities, small family day care homes. Proposed retail commercial, office and residential uses would be consistent with uses allowed in these zones. However, since the project proposal would modify lot lines so that the parking spaces associated with the North Santa Cruz parcel would become part of this parcel, a zoning amendment from R-1D:LHP to CBD is proposed on the portion of the site where parking spaces would be located. Both project parcels have the LHP Overlay Zone. The purpose of this overlay zone is to protect structures or areas with special historical, architectural, or aesthetic interest from being destroyed or impaired despite the feasibility of preserving them. See discussion under Sections I and III, Aesthetics and Cultural Resources for more discussion of the project's impact on the historic and aesthetic values of the historic structure on the site, the Coggeshall Mansion. The proposed project would introduce new retail commercial, office and residential uses on the project site. The project vicinity is comprised of a mix of commercial and residential uses. There are retail and service commercial uses adjacent to the North Santa Cruz parcel (to the north, south, and east) and proposed development of retail commercial and office uses on this parcel would be consistent with the existing mix of uses. There are residential uses adjacent to the Wilder Avenue parcel (to the north, south, and west), and proposed residential development on this parcel would be consistent with surrounding residential uses. Therefore, no land use compatibility problems would be expected. Potentially Significant Potentially Impact Unless Less Than Issues (and Supporting Information Sources) Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact X. Mineral Resources - Would the project: a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral X resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally-important X mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? The Los Gatos General Plan does not identify any regionally or locally-important mineral resources on the project site or in its vicinity. XI. Noise - Would the project result in: a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in X excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive X groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels? c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in X the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient X noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? DECEMBER, 2007 19 INITIAL STUDY - 115 NORTH SANTA CRUZ AVENUE AND 112 WILDER AVENUE ssues (and Supporting Information Sources) Potentially Significant Impact Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact o Impact e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, X where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would X the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? Construction Noise. The Town Noise Ordinance (Chapter 16) restricts construction activities to the hours of 8:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. on weekdays and 9:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. on weekends and holidays. This ordinance also limits noise generation to 85 dBA at the property line or 85 dBA at 25 feet. Project construction would result in temporary short-term noise increases due to the operation of heavy equipment. Construction noise sources range from about 82 to 90 dBA at 25 feet for most types of construction equipment, and slightly higher levels of about 94 to 97 dBA at 25 feet for certain types of earthmoving and impact equipment. If noise controls are installed on construction equipment, the noise levels could be reduced to 80 to 85 dBA at 25 feet, depending on the type of equipment. With controls, construction noise levels could be made to comply with the Town Noise Ordinance. Residential uses are generally considered to be noise-sensitive uses or sensitive receptors. There are two existing residences located adjacent to the Wilder parcel, and one of these residences is also located adjacent to the western boundary of the North Santa Cruz parcel. Both of these residential properties adjoin existing off-street parking spaces on the project site. Construction of the future residence could occur as close as 25 feet from these two residences, while reconfiguration of the parking spaces adjacent to the alleyway could occur as close as 50 feet from one of these residences. At 25 feet, the ordinance noise limit (85 dBA at 25 feet) would result in maximum noise levels of 85 dBA, while at 50 feet, maximum noise levels would be 79 dBA. Temporary disturbance (e.g., speech interference) can occur if the noise level in the interior of a building exceeds 45 to 60 dBA.s To maintain such interior noise levels, exterior noise levels at the closest residences (with windows closed) should not exceed 70 to 80 dBA and this exterior noise level is used as a significance threshold or criterion. Maximum construction noise levels could periodically exceed this threshold, particularly when heavy equipment associated with construction of the future residence on the Wilder parcel is operating closer than 50 feet of these residences. However, existing fencing along the boundaries adjoining these two residences would serve as noise barriers and help reduce construction-related noise at these residences. Given the limited duration of construction associated with one home, enforcement of time restrictions and noise level standards contained in the Town Noise Ordinance would help to maintain construction noise levels at acceptable levels and limit duration when speech interference effects could occur, reducing potential construction- related noise impacts to less than significant. Operational Noise. Adjacent residences are currently subject to noise from cars parking in the existing parking lot on the Wilder parcel and existing parking spaces adjacent to the alleyway. Since the project would reduce the number of parking spaces, noise from parking cars would decrease with the proposed project. Although the project would add seven parking spaces adjacent to the alleyway, parking-related noise already occurs in this vicinity since there are already six existing parking spaces in the same area. Therefore, proposed reconfiguration of parking spaces on the western portion of the project site would not significantly increase operational noise. The proposed reduction in the size of the existing restaurant use DECEMBER, 2007 20 INITIAL STUDY - 115 NORTH SANTA CRUZ AVENUE AND 112 WILDER AVENUE would also reduce the number of cars parking and traveling along the alleyway during the more noise- sensitive late evening hours. The proposed retail and office uses are not expected to generate traffic during the late evening hours. Potentially Significant Potentially Impact Unless Less Than Issues (and Supporting Information Sources) Significant Im Mitigation Significant No pact Incorporated Impact Impact XII. Population and Housing - Would the project: a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either. X directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, X necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the X construction of replacement housing elsewhere? The proposed project would result in the construction of one single-family residence on the Wilder parcel, and would not result in intensification of residential uses or significantly increase local or regional population. No existing housing units would be displaced by the project. The project would also construct two retail commercial buildings on the site and provide commercial office space in the second story of the Coggeshall Mansion, which is currently occupied by a commercial use. The project would not be considered growth inducing since the project would involve redevelopment of an existing developed parcel and the project would not extend roads or infrastructure to any adjacent properties. Adjacent parcels are already developed with retail commercial and residential uses. XIII. Public Services - a) Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: Fire protection? X Police protection? X Schools? X Parks? X Other public facilities? X Public safety services are already provided to the existing restaurant on the project site as well as to adjacent commercial and residential uses. Increased demand for schools and recreational services by the proposed single-family residence would be less than significant, while the proposed retail commercial and office uses would generate no demand for school and recreational services in the community. No significant increase in demand on public services would occur with the proposed project. Police protection services are currently being provided to the existing restaurant on the site and surrounding DECEMBER, 2007 21 INITIAL STUDY - 115 NORTH SANTA CRUZ AVENUE AND 112 WILDER AVENUE retail commercial and residential uses. With the proposed project, these services would extend to the proposed retail commercial buildings and single-family residence on the project site, which would be a less-than-significant increase in demand for these services. The Santa Clara County Fire Department has reviewed the proposed plan for site access and water supply, and the project will be required to meet Department requirements for minimum fire flow, automatic fire sprinklers, and premise identification.b The project will be required to install an automatic fire sprinkler system. The proposed plan will be subject to formal plan review by the Santa Clara County Fire Department to determine compliance with adopted model codes. Potentially Significant Potentially Impact Unless Less Than Issues (and Supporting Information Sources) Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact XIV. Recreation - a) Would the project increase the use of existing X neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require X the construction or expansion of recreational facilities, which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? The proposed addition of one residential unit would incrementally add new population to the area, and thereby increase the demand for recreational services. This incremental increase would not be expected to be significant given the small size of the project. XV. Transportation/Traffic - Would the project: a) Cause an increase in traffic, which is substantial in relation X to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (i.e., result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections)? b) Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of X service standard established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an X increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g., X sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? e) Result in inadequate emergency access? X f) Result in inadequate parking capacity? X g) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs X supporting alternative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? DECEMBER, 2007 22 INITIAL STUDY 115 NORTH SANTA CRUZ AVENUE AND 112 WILDER AVENUE Trip Generation. The Town's Traffic Impact Policy (Resolution 1991-174) requires preparation of a detailed traffic study for any project with the potential to generate 20 or more additional AM or PM peak hour trips. The existing restaurant on the project property currently generates traffic from the existing 198-seat restaurant (566 average daily trips, 6 AM peak hour trips, and 55 PM peak hour trips). Since the project sponsor proposes to reduce the size of the restaurant (135 seats) while adding 1,600 square feet of retail space and 1,262 square feet of office space, the project would result in a net reduction in traffic generated at the project site on a daily basis and during the PM peak hour (471 average daily trips, 8 AM peak hour trips, and 44 PM peak hour trips). Therefore, the proposed project would have no impact on the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system nor would it contribute to cumulative impacts on existing intersection or roadways level of service operation in the project vicinity. Parking. At present, there are 22 parking spaces on the project site (16 spaces are in the parking lot adjacent to Wilder Avenue, while six spaces are adjacent to the alleyway) and 44 parking spaces in the Parking Assessment District (PAD), or a total of 66 parking spaces. The project proposal would reconfigure the two project parcels so that the six existing on-site parking spaces adjacent to the alleyway would be located on the same North Santa Cruz parcel and seven more on-site spaces would be added on both sides of the alleyway, for a total of 13 on-site parking spaces on the North Santa Cruz parcel. The proposed project would result in a net reduction of nine on-site parking spaces. With the 44 PAD spaces, the project would have a total of 57 parking spaces. Along with the project's trip generation, its parking demand would also decrease. The Town will require provision of 57 spaces (45 spaces for the 135-seat restaurant; six spaces for the retail space; and six spaces of the office space)' and the project would meet this parking requirement. On the Wilder parcel, the proposed plan indicates that a two-car garage for the future residence and two guest spaces (located east of the garage) would be located adjacent to the alleyway. The Town's Zoning Ordinance would require provision of two parking spaces for the future home and the project would meet this requirement. Safety Hazards. The project would eliminate the parking lot driveway on Wilder Avenue, reducing the potential for traffic conflicts at this driveway. The project, however, would add 11 parking spaces (four residential spaces and seven commercial spaces) directly adjacent to the existing alleyway, and vehicles would back out of these spaces directly into the alleyway. These spaces are perpendicular to the alleyway and could increase delays for vehicles using the alley as a result of an increased number of parking maneuvers along this section of the alleyway. Given the narrow width of this alley and presence of similar parking spaces along this alleyway, travel speeds are low and therefore, potential increases in safety hazards posed by the proposed parking space configuration would be less than significant. Potentially Significant Potentially Impact Unless Less Than Issues (and Supporting Information Sources) Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact impact XVI. Utilities and Service Systems- Would the project: a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the X applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? b) Require or result in the construction of new water or X wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? DECEMBER, 2007 23 INITIAL STUDY - 115 NORTH SANTA CRUZ AVENUE AND 112 WILDER AVENUE Potentially Significant Potentially Impact Unless Less Than Issues (and Supporting Information Sources) Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact c) Require or result in the construction of new storm water X drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the X project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment X provider, which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the projects projected demand in addition to the providers existing commitments? f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to X accommodate the projects solid waste disposal needs? g) Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and X regulations related to solid waste? Utilities are currently provided to the project site and adjoining commercial and residential uses. The proposed retail commercial buildings and single-family residence would be required to connect to the existing water and sewer lines in North Santa Cruz Avenue or Wilder Avenue, both located adjacent to the site. No major off-site utility improvements would be expected to be required for development of the project's commercial and residential buildings. Project development would also include construction of storm drainage facilities (see Section VIII, Hydrology and Water Quality). The Fire Department will require provision of an approved, automatic fire sprinkler system in the proposed building." Other utilities (electrical, gas, telephone, cable TV facilities) will be upgraded as necessary. XVII. Mandatory Findings of Significance - a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality X of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b) Does the project have impacts that are individually X limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)? c) Does the project have environmental effects which will X cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? DECEMBER, 2007 24 INITIAL STUDY - 115 NORTH SANTA CRUZ AVENUE AND 112 WILDER AVENUE LIST OF SUPPORTING INFORMATION SOURCES (Indicated as endnotes under specific issues of Initial Study) 'Bay Area Air Quality Management District, 1999. BAAQMD CEQA Guidelines. December. z Nolan Associates, 1999. Draft Erosion Potential Map, Shrink-Swell Potential of Soils, Slope Stability Hazard Map, Debris Flow Hazard Map, Liquefaction Hazard Zones Map, Seismic Shaking Hazards Map, Geologic Map, Fault Rupture Hazard Zones Map for the Town of Los Gatos General Plan Update. January 17. 3 Nolan Associates, 1999. Draft Fault, Lineament & Coseismic Deformation Map for the Town of Los Gatos General Plan Update. January 17. 4 Town of Los Gatos Development Application Supplement, Hazardous Wastes and Substances Statement for 115 North Santa Cruz Avenue, Los Gatos, October 4, 2006. 5 In indoor noise environments, the highest noise level that permits relaxed conversation with 100% intelligibility throughout the room is 45 dBA. Speech interference is considered to become intolerable when normal conversation is precluded at 3 feet, which occurs when background noise levels exceed 60 dBA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Information on Levels of Environmental Noise Requisite to Protect Public Health and Welfare with an Adequate Margin of Safety [Condensed Version], 1974). 6 Santa Clara County Fire Department, 2007. Development Review Comments. January 25 and September 4. ' Section 29.10.150 (f) (3) and (5) of the Town Code requires that the number of off-street spaces required for properties in parking districts shall be calculated using an assessment formula based on a number of factors, including floor area, use, credits for existing on-site parking spaces, and participation in past assessment districts. Any parking spaces that are credited in the parking assessment district calculation may not be eliminated. s Santa Clara County Fire Department, 2006. Development Review Comments. July 25. DECEMBER, 2007 25 ATTACHMENT 1 ARCHITECTURAL EVALUATION FOR CHART HOUSE/ 115 NORTH SANTA CRUZ AVENUE RETAIL ADDITIONS LOS GATOS, CALIFORNIA APRIL 20, 2007 AND SEPTEMBER 24, 2007 BY CANNON DESIGN GROUP ARCHITECTURE PLANNINC URBAN DESIGN RECEIVED April 20, 2007 Ms. Sandy Baily MAY - 3 2007 Community Development Department Town of Los Gatos TOWN OF LOS GATOS 110 E. Main Street PLANNING DIVISION P.O. Box 949 Los Gatos, CA 95031 RE: Chart House Dear Sandy: I reviewed the revised drawings, and read the Historic Preservation Committee's letter to the architect and the architect's response to staff. My comments and recommendations are as follows: Neighborhood Context and Issues The existing building is set well back from the front property line, creating a garden setting for the historic structure. The northern portion of the Coggeshall Mansion, constructed in 1891, is clearly the older, original portion of the structure, and the most important as a contributor to the Santa Cruz Avenue streetscape. TEL: 415.331.3795 FAX: 415.331.3797 EMAIL: cdgplan@pacbQII.net 180 HARBOR DRIVE. SUITE 219. SAUSALITO. CA 94965 View south along sidewalk View to entry and original portion of the house Currently Proposed Site Plan Chart House Design Review Comments April 20, 2007 Page 2 The primary issues seem to be as follows: 1. To what degree will the infill of a significant portion of the garden in front of the Mansion compromise the his- toric setting and quality of the existing structure? 2. Will the added structures improve or detract from the urban design quality of Downtown Los Gatos? 3. Is the amount of proposed new construction in the front garden area appropriate for the site? All of these are value judgements. I am unable to make a firm recommendation, but can pose a range of options that may assist staff, the Historic Preservation Committee and the Planning Commission in selecting the most comfortable solution for the context of Downtown. Options The following four options are arranged from the least to the most impact on the current site conditions. Option 1. No Project The trees and landscaping add variety to the otherwise continuous commercial storefronts and create a minipark within the downtown. Downtown Pleasanton has a similar condition of a restaurant in a historic structure set back from the street with a landscaped garden area between the structure and the sidewalk. The front setback is used for outdoor din- ing which has added its own liveliness to the streetscape. CANNON DESIGN GROUP 180 HARBOR DRIVE. SUITE 219 . SAUSALITO. C4 94965 Lnart House Design Review Comments Aprit 20,-2007 Page 3 Option 2. Limit the Addition to One Structure Eliminate the smaller structure to the north. The extent of new construction seems substantially more than I looked at during my earlier studies last October. This approach would partially retain the current garden feeling, and would maintain good visual exposure for the original historic portion of the house. Some improvements to the front garden to make it more accessible and usable should be considered. This option would allow additional retail at the street front while minimizing negative impacts on the portion of the existing structure that contributes most to the visual quality of the streetscape. OPTION 2 CANNON DESIGN GROUP 180 HARBOR DRIVE . x-2'#'3. SAUSALITO. CA 94965 Remove second building and enhance garden Chart Mouse Design Review Comments April 20, 2007 Page 4 Option 3. Reduce the Size of the Structure to the North Reducing the northern structure and treating it more as a retail kiosk woyld reduce its impact on the existing structure and maintain a sense of the garden setting. Some increase in the size of the southern structure might be considered to compensate for some of this floor area reduction. OPTION 3 SITE PLAN CANNON DESIGN GROUP 180 HARBOR DRIVE. SUITE 219. SAUSALITO. CA 94965 Increase size of Decrease size of smaller larger structure structure and treat as kiosk Increase in depth to the Reduce mass and treat as object west better than increase in the garden rather than a building in length to the north unarc -.-e Design Review Comments April 20, 2007 Page 5 Eliminate roof top element Stucco wall is inconsistent with the architectural style and the element conflicts with the Queen Anne turret ;Reduced scale Roof at property line seems very awkward Better to use same slope at other roof planes OPTION 3 ALTERNATIVE ELEVATION Increase size of larger structure Better if additional area is at back of structure Kiosk ------H H H i D H H H H H H H H H H H H H i H Decrease size of smaller structure and treat as kiosk Reduce mass and treat as object in the garden rather than a building CANNON DESIGN GROUP 180 HARBOR DRIVE. SUITE 219. SAUSALITO. CA 94965 CURRENTLY PROPOSED ELEVATION mart house Design Review Comments April 20, 2007 Page 6 Option 4. Modify the Design of the Smaller Structure The two rather different forms of the two structures seems uncomfortable to me. I believe that redesigning the norther- ly structure to reflect the curved form of the southerly building would be better. It would create a more classic symmetry and, by eliminating the south facing gable, would reduce the obstruction to views of the Queen Anne turret. Treat smaller building with rounded end to create more of a classical symmetrical entry OPTION 4 CANNON DESIGN GROUP 180 HARBOR DRIVE. SUITE 219. SAUSALITO. CA 94965 l IlUrl rzuu~c Design Review Comments April 20, 2007 Page 7 Eliminate roof top element Stucco wall Is inconsistent with the architectural styie.and the element conflicts with the Queen Anne turret With regard to the design of the structures themselves, I would definitely recommend eliminating the roof top element. The use of stucco on the roof is inconsistent with the architectural style, and the roof elements seem to compete with the Queen Anne turret of the existing structure without adding anything substantial to the project. And, I am conflicted about the use of stucco on the walls of the buildings. It would seem that metal, metal and glass, or metal and opaque glass would be better than using stucco since the structures are treated similar to conservatories which would typically limit stucco, brick, or stone to wainscot bases. The proposed project is unique and does not easily fit within the framework of the adopted Commercial Design Guidelines. Because of the uniqueness of the historic building and its substantial setback from the street, the site and any development intensification should be judged on the extent to which the proposal would relate to, and reinforce, the character and quality of the Coggeshall Mansion, and the extent to which is would retain the existing park-like setting along the street. Sandy, lease let me know if you have any questions, or if there are specific issues of concern that I did not address. Sincerely, CANNON DESIGN GROUP Larry Cannon AICP President CANNON DESIGN GROUP 180 HARBOR DRIVE. SUITE 219. SAUSALITO. CA 94965 CURRENTLY PROPOSED ELEVATION OPTION 4 ALTERNATIVE ELEVATION ARCHITECTURE PLANNING URBAN DESIGN RECEIVED September 24, 2007, 2007 SEP 2-5 2007 Ms. Sandy Baily Community Development Department TOWN OF LOS GATOS Town of Los Gatos PLANNING DIVISION 110 E. Main Street P.O. Box 949 Los Gatos, CA 95031 RE: 115 North Santa Crus Avenue Retail Addions Dear Sandy: I reviewed the revised drawings. The design is much improved since I first reviewed it. There are, however, two lingering concerns as follows: 1. The roof form is very awkward at the south property line with the odd angle to the end - partly a result of trying to achieve the maximum building square footage at an angled property line. In some cases that might be acceptable, but I do believe that the historic quality of the existing structure on this site deserves a more classic and complete design solu- tion. It would be better to relate the roof form more directly to the north end of this structure. Some adjustment would be needed for the location and/or form of building element on the west side of the structure. This roof condition and gable entry close to end _ I of the building is awkward P'ROPOSED`FRONT ELEVATION Symmetrical roof form and holding entry gable away from the building end would be more desirable to the existing building than stucco walls Stone or stucco base OK RECOMMENDED FRONT ELEVATION TEL: 415.331.3795 FAX: 415.331.3797 EMAIL: cdgplan@pacbell.net 180 HARBOR DRIVE. SUITE 219. SAUSALITO. CA 94965 115 North Santa Cruz Avenue Retail Additions Design Review Comments September 24, 2007 Page 2 2. Related to the above comment, the placement of the entry gable so close to the south end of the building seems awkward and out of character with this type of structure. Moving the entry to the north, as shown in the Recommenda- tions diagram, would be desirable. 3. I am still very concerned about the use of stucco for the wall materials. Strong consideration should be given to the use of a wood frame and panel system for the walls, relating them strongly to the window system and the wood of the existing building on the site. Relating to the historic quality building seems more appropriate to me than relating to the adjacent stucco buildings. Sandy, please let me know if you have any questions or need any other issues addressed. Sincerely, CANNON DESIGN GROUP ) Larry Cannon AICP President CANNON DESIGN GROUP 180 HARBOR DRIVE. SUITE 219. SAUSALITO . CA 94965 ATTACHMENT 2 A TREE INVENTORY AND REVIEW OF THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AT 115 N. SANTA CRUZ AVENUE LOS GATOS, CALIFORNIA SEPTEMBER 21, 2007 BY ARBOR RESOURCES 4 .ARBOR RESOURCES Professional Arboricultural Consulting & Tree Care A TREE INVENTORY AND REVIEW OF THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AT 115 N. SANTA CRUZ AVENUE LOS GATOS, CALIFORNIA PROPERTY OWNER: Santa Cruz Wilder LLC APPLICANT: John Lien APN: 510-17-065 and 071 Submitted to: Sandy L. Baily, AICP Community Development Department Town of Los Gatos 110 East Main Street Los Gatos, CA 95031 Prepared by: David L. Babby, RCA ASCA Registered Consulting Arborist #399 1-SA Certified Arborist WE-4001A September 21, 2007 RECEIVE D SEP 2 12007 PORN OF LOS GATOS NING DIVISION P.O. Box 25295, San Mateo, California 94402 • Email: arborresources@comcast.net Phone: 650.654.3351 0 Fax: 650.240.0777 4 Licensed Contractor #796763 David L. Babby, Registered Consulting Arborist September 21, 2007 TABLE OF CONTENTS j SECTION TITLE PAGE 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1 ,I 2.0 TREE COUNT AND COMPOSITION I 3.0 REVIEW OF PROJECT IMPACTS AND TREES 2 4.0 RECOMMENDATIONS 3 4.1 Design Guidelines 3 4.2 Protection Measures Before and During Construction 5 EXHIBITS EDIT TITLE A TREE INVENTORY TABLE B SITE MAP i i David L. Babby, Registered Consulting Arborist September 21, 2007 1.0 INTRODUCTION I have been retained by the Town of Los Gatos Community Development Department to review the potential tree impacts associated with the proposed construction of two retail buildings and associated grading along the frontage of 115 N. Santa Cruz Avenue, Los Gatos. This report presents my analysis and recommendations. Trees inventoried for this report are defined as "Protected" and situated within the front section of the property along N. Santa Cruz Avenue. Documents reviewed for this report include the following: [1] Sheets 1, 1A and 4 (all dated 8/22/07) by John Lien Architect, and [2] a report by Barrie D. Coate and Associates, dated 7/24/07. The trees' locations and assigned numbers are presented on a copy of Sheet 1 (Site Plan) in Exhibit B. Note that I assume the locations of trees shown on the plans reviewed have been surveyed and are accurate; if this is not the case, the locations of the large trees should be surveyed and presented on future plans. 2.0 TREE COUNT AND COMPOSITION There are 10 trees of five various species inventoried for this report; they include four pittosporum (41 and 8-10), two holly oaks (#2 and 3), one coast live oak (#4), one date palm (0), and two coast redwoods (#6 and 7). Specific data recorded for each tree is presented within the Tree Inventory Table in Exhibit A. 1 Section 29.10.0960 of the Town Code defines a "Protected Tree" on private property as being regulated and having a trunk diameter of four inches and greater measured at three feet above grade. Fruit- or nut-bearing trees with trunks less than 18 inches in diameter are exempt (Section 29.10.0970). 115 N. Santa Cruz Avenue, Los Gatos Page I of 7 Town of Los Gatos Community Development Department David L. Babby, Registered ConsultingArborist September 21, 2007 Three of the inventoried trees, #2 thru 4, are located within the public right-of-way between the curb and sidewalk (i.e. "street trees"). The plans identify four street trees; however, the southernmost one does not exist and should be omitted from the plans. There are five additional river birch (Betulus nigra) situated in a row along the northern property boundary immediately north of the restaurant. They are all of Ordinance-size, range in fair to good condition, and have trunk diameters ranging from 4 to 12 inches. The plans identify an additional redwood at the rear of the building. It is a very large redwood that appears in overall fair health and has a trunk diameter of 39.5 inches and a canopy spread of 40 feet. In the event the parking lot and rear alleyway along the west side of the property were to be used for access and staging during construction, the following additional trees would be at risk: three small redwoods, two large redwoods, one coast live oak on a neighboring site, and one laurel. 3.0 REVIEW OF PROJECT IlVIPACTS AND TREES Seven trees are indicated on the plans to be removed for development purposes; they include #1, 3, 5, 6 and 8-10. Based on their current condition and/or species, their loss seemingly conforms to Section 29.10.0990 of the Town Code. For reasons specified below, replacement trees would be necessary to mitigate the loss of trees #3 and 5. ■ Trees #1 and 8-10 are pittosporum in a state of poor and declining condition, a situation that is expected to lead to their demise in the near future. As such, these trees can be regarded as hazardous and mitigation would not be necessary. ■ Tree #3 is a holly oak located along the street and appears in only fair overall condition due to a sparse canopy and significant damage to its lower trunk. ■ Tree #5 is a Canary Island date palm in overall good condition but requires high maintenance to avoid its frond and fruit falling onto people below. 115 N. Santa Cruz Avenue, Los Gatos Page 2 of 7 Town of Los Gatos Community Development Department David L. Babby, Registered Consulting Arborist September 21, 2007 • Tree #6 is a redwood that has an abnormal indentation at the base of the east side of its trunk. Further exploration to determine the cause of the formation resulted in removing river rock surrounding the trunk. In doing so, it exposed a three-inch girdling root and the absence of a buttress root at the trunk's east side, both situations predisposing the tree to fall over and/or prematurely decline and die. As such, it is my opinion that the tree can be regarded as hazardous and should be removed regardless of the proposed development. Mr. Coate also recommends the tree's removal irrespective of planned construction. 4.0 RECOMMENDATIONS The recommendations presented within this section are based on plans reviewed and serve as guidelines to mitigate tree-related impacts. Please note that they are subject to revision upon reviewing any additional or revised plans. 4.1 Design Guidelines 1. The plans should reflect the accurate trunk locations, trunk diameters, and canopy dimensions of each tree. I also suggest the ground elevations of two sides of tree 47's trunk is surveyed and shown on Sheet 4. 2. The section of new brick, including base material, being installed beneath tree 47's canopy must be fully pervious 3. The section of walkway and curb within 12 feet from tree #7's trunk must require no more than a six-inch vertical cut, including for base materials, edging and forms. Preferably, these features should be established entirely on top of existing soil grade with no soil cuts. 115 N. Santa Cruz Avenue, Los Gatos Town of Los Gatos Community Development Department Page 3 of 7 J David L. Babby, Registered Consulting Arborist September 21, 2007 4. The subgrade within 10 feet from tree #7's trunk must not be directly compacted. Additionally, compaction of subbase materials must not exceed 85-percent density.I also recommend that 5. Any new underground utilities and services should be established outside from beneath the trees' canopies. I should be consulted in the event this is not feasible. 6. Approved excavation for the building footings must not require more than a 12- (preferred) to 18-inch overcut where beneath tree #7's canopy. 7. The permanent and temporary drainage design, including downspouts, should not require water being discharged beneath the canopies. 8. Per Section 29.10.1000(C.1) of the Ordinance, a copy of this report (or a revised version) must be incorporated into the final set of project plans, titled Sheet(s) T-l, T- 2, etc. (Tree Protection Instructions), and referenced on all site-related plans (e.g. Sheets 1 and 4, as well as any landscape plans). 9. Section 29.10.095 of the Ordinance should be used as the framework for mitigating the removal of trees. For replacement trees, their amount, species and size shall be determined by the Parks and Public Works Department, and planted prior to final inspection. They must be double-staked with rubber tree ties and all forms of irrigation shall be of an automatic drip or soaker hose system placed on the soil surface and not in a sleeve. 10. The proposed landscape design should conform to the following guidelines: a. New plants should only be installed at least three feet from the base of the redwood trunks. b. Irrigation for new plant material should be of a drip-type system and not applied within one-foot from the trees' trunks. c. Trenching for irrigation or lighting should be avoided beneath the canopies. If necessary, they should be routed in a radial direction to the trunks. 115 N. Santa Cruz Avenue, Los Gatos Page 4 of 7 Town of Los Gatos Community Development Department David L. Babby, Registered Consulting Arborist September 21, 2007 d. Stones, mulch and fencing should not be placed against the trunks of existing or new trees. Plastic ground cover should also be avoided beneath canopies. e. Tilling beneath canopies should be avoided, including for weed control. E Bender board or other edging material proposed beneath the canopies should be established on top of existing soil grade (such as by using vertical stakes). 4.2 Protection Measures before and during Construction 11. Due to the close proximity of activities among trees, an ISA (International Society of Arboriculture) certified arborist and/or a member of ASCA (American Society of Consulting Arborists) - to be named the "project arborist" - should be retained by the applicant or owner to assist in implementing and achieving compliance with all tree protection measures. 12. Prior to any demolition or site clearing work, a pre-construction meeting should be held on-site with the project arborist and contractor to discuss work procedures, protection fencing locations and types, limits of grading, staging areas, routes of access, supplemental watering, mulching, locations for equipment washing pits, and any other applicable tree protection measures. The limits of grading should be staked prior to the meeting. 13. Tree protective fencing shall be installed prior to any demolition, construction, trenching or surface scraping, and its precise location must be determined and its placement approved by the project arborist. The material used shall be in accordance with Section 29.10.1005 of the Ordinance and approved by the project arborist. 14. Unless otherwise approved, all development activities must be conducted outside the designated protected areas and off unpaved areas beneath the canopies of Ordinance- size trees inventoried and not inventoried for this report. These activities include, but are not limited to, the following: demolition, grading, stripping of topsoil, trenching, equipment cleaning, stockpiling/dumping of materials, and equipmentivehicle operation and parking. 115 N. Santa Cruz Avenue, Los Gatos Page S of 7 Town of Los Gatos Community Development Department David L. Babby, Registered Consulting Arborist September 21, 2007 15. Prior to commencing work, I recommend a six-inch layer of coarse wood chips ('/a- to 3/a- inch in size) is manually spread on unpaved soil beneath tree O's canopy, excluding where within 12 inches from the building footprint (the wood chips should not be piled or placed against the trunk). The wood chips should remain throughout j construction (and possibly beyond), and must not be placed against the trees' trunks. These wood chips can be obtained from tree service companies and/or by contacting www.reuserinc.com. Plywood can be placed on top of the wood chips (but not against the trunks) and tied together to create a sturdy walking surface. 16. Any approved activity required on unpaved areas beneath the trees' canopies must be performed under the knowledge and direction of the project arborist. All work should i be manually performed using hand tools and wheelbarrows. In the event roots of two inches and greater are encountered during the process, the project arborist shall be consulted. 17. In the event any piers or post-holes are dug beneath the canopies, their locations should be first reviewed with the project arborist. The first 2.5 to 3 feet below existing grade should be dug using a post-hole digger. If roots >2 inches in diameter are encountered during this process, the hole should be resituated to either side. If no root is found, the remaining section of hole can be mechanically drilled using a manually-operated auger. 18. All existing, unused lines or pipes beneath the canopies of retained trees (and beyond the proposed home) should be abandoned and cut off just below existing soil grade. 19. Each recommendation presented within Section 4.1 of this report and applicable to the actual development of the site shall be followed. 20. Throughout development, supplemental water should be supplied to the retained trees; the project arborist shall determine the specific trees, intervals, amounts and application methods. 115 N. Santa Cruz Avenue, Los Gatos Page 6 of 7 Town of Los Gatos Community Development Department David L. Babby, Registered Consulting Arborist September 21, 2007 21. All river rocks piled against and near tree #7's trunk should be immediately pulled away by hand. 22. The pruning of trees shall be performed prior to construction, in accordance with ANSI A300-2001 standards, and by a California state-licensed tree service company that has an ISA (International Society of Arboriculture) Certified Arborist in a supervisory role. 23. All equipment shall be positioned to avoid the trunks and branches of trees. Where a conflict arises, the project arborist must be contacted to help address the situation. 24. The disposal of harmful products (such as chemicals, oil and gasoline) is prohibited beneath canopies or anywhere on site that allows drainage beneath canopies. Herbicides should not be used beneath the trees' canopies; where used on site, they should be labeled for safe use near trees. Prepared By: 01;~ David L. Babby, RC Date: September 21, 2007 r~ ~74A MT ~'nsuieir.= 115 N. Santa Cruz Avenue, Los Gatos Page 7 of 7 Town of Los Gatos Community Development Department i David L. Babby, Registered ConsultingArborist September 21, 2007 EXHIBIT A: TREE INVENTORY TABLE 115 N. Santa Cruz Avenue, Los Gatos Town of Los Gatos Community Development Department TREE INVENTORY TABLE ;7~ G~ .o 3 o 3 ~ o y N G U G c N O 140~ v O TREE 72- ° o o o 21- c NO TREE NAME: E :f7 W v~ -v. v~ . < , . , .Z-.. Pittosponmz 1 (Pittosporum eugenioides) 4 25 25% 50% Poor Low X Comments: At least 50-percent of canopy is dead. Tree appears beyond recovery and continued decline is expected. Holly Oak 2 (Quercus ilex) 16 35 75% 500% Fair Moderate 2 - X Comments: Significant damage to overhead limbs due to vehicles. Holly Oak 3 I (Quercusilex) I 15 35 I 500% 75% I Fair I Moderate I - I X ( I X Comments: Significant damage to lower trunk. Canopy is sparse. Coast Live Oak 4 (Quercus agr;folia } 1 6 75% 75% Good Low 2 - X Comments: Tree is newly planted and has a low-growing structure that significantly encroaches. If pruned to alleviate this conflict, most of the canopy would be removed. Tree is not suitable and should be removed. I : 1- s Canary Island Date Palm (Phoenix canariensis) -22 25 100% 100% Good Moderate - X . . Comments: Tree has approximately 35 feet of brown trunk feet. Trunk diameter is an estimate due to limited access. L I Coast Redwood b (Sequoia ia se ervirens) 15.5 20 100 /0 25 /o Poor Low X I I ° I ° I I I - I I I Comments: Rocks are piled against lower trunk. There is an indentation on the trunk's bottom east side, a defect sym tomatic of a girdling root. The mot area should be examined for safety reasons. Coast Redwood 7 (Sequoia sempervirens) 21.5 25 100% 100% Good High 1 - Comments: Rocks are also piled against trunk Pittosponmm 8 (Pittos orum eugenioides) 10 20 25% 50% Poor Low X Comments: Tree is dying as most of the live foliage is absent. Pittosporum 4 (Pittos arum eu enioides) 6.5 15 25% 50% Poor Low - X Comments: Canopy is significantly sparse. I 1 ( i nnn I I I I ° I I I - I I I 10 PittospDrum rum e u enzozdes) 10 30 50% 50% Fair Low X Comments: Tree contains large deadwood. Site; 115 N. Santa Cruz Avenue, Los Gatos Prepared for. Town of Los Gatos Comm. Develop. Depart. Prepared by. David L.-Babby, RCA September 21, 2007 i _i David L. Babby, Registered Consulting Arborist September 21, 2007 EXHIBIT B: SITE MAP 115 N. Santa Cruz Avenue, Los Gatos Town of Los Gatos Community Development Department 114111 aI I f l1 a 0 co 0 ul z LLJ Q N D U Q E-- z Q z Y r r a z; N ATTACHMENT 3 SUMMARY OF MEETING MINUTES FOR LOS GATOS HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMITTEE APRIL 5, 2007 110 TOWN OF LOS GATOS 110 East Main Street, Los Gatos, CA 95032 (408) 354-6872 SUMMARY MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMITTEE OF THE TOWN OF LOS GATOS FOR APRIL 5, 2006, HELD IN THE TOWN COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 110 E MAIN STREET, LOS GATOS, CALIFORNIA. The meeting was called to order at 5:30 P.M. by Chair Burch. ATTENDANCE Members Present: Kendra Burch, Bob Cowan, D. Michael Kane, and Len Pacheco Members Absent: Steve Rice Staff Present: Sandy Baily, Associate Planner ITEM 1: 516 SAN BENITO AVENUE The Committee considered a request to remove this pre-1941 single family residence from the Town's Historic Resources Inventory. Burch moved to approve the request on the basis that the structure has no historic significance. Pacheco seconded, motion passed unanimously. Appeal rights were cited. ITEM 2: 16925 ROBERTS ROAD The Committee considered a request to remove this pre-1941 single family residence from the Town's Historic Resources Inventory. Pacheco moved to approve the request on the basis that . although the siding is historic, the architectural form of the structure is not distinctive and the period trim and windows are gone. Kane seconded, motion passed unanimously. For the record, the Committee stated that the structure is a classic bungalow in terms of shape and siding material and staff should take this into consideration when reviewing any future additions. ITEM 3. 262 LOS GATOS BLVD The Committee considered a request to demolish a pre-1941 single family residence. Burch moved to recommend approval of the demolition to the Development Review Committee based on the structural documentation provided at a previous meeting which justified that the house is in poor condition and has several additions which were poorly constructed. Kane seconded, motion passed unanimously. The Committee stated that the replacement structure should be sensitive to the neighborhood. ITEM 4. 255 EDELEN AVENUE The Committee considered a request for exterior modifications to a single family residence located in the University/Edelen Historic District. Pacheco moved to approve the application as modified at the meeting subject to the following conditions: 1. A dormer style element shall be constructed which extends from the main roof and is supported by the internal roof structure. This element shall incorporate lattice material. A drawing of this modification is attached to the approved plan. 2. The front porch shall be constructed entirely in wood and shall be of a style appropriate to the architectural style of the house. 3. Siding material shall match existing. Burch seconded. Motion passed unanimously. Appeal rights were cited. ITEM 5. 100 CREFFIELD HEIGHTS The Committee considered plans for a first and second story addition to a pre-1941 single family residence. Pacheco moved to recommend approval of the application to the Director of Community Development. Burch seconded, motion passed unanimously. The Committee found that the additions to be removed were not historic and that the brick siding was irreparable and could be removed. This work would not classify as a demolition. ITEM 6. 44 PLEASANT STREET The Committee considered plans to relocate and add onto a pre-1941 single family residence. The applicant was commended for going through significant lengths to meet Committee concerns. Burch moved to recommend approval of the application to the Development Review Committee subject to the following conditions: 1. The eaves of the addition shall be extended six inches. 2. The windows in the addition shall be raised six inches. 3. A stone fascia shall be added on the new porch to match the existing stone on the front porch. 4. The porch brackets shall be removed on the new porch. Cowan seconded, motion passed unanimously. ITEM 7. OTHER BUSINESS a. 307 Pennsylvania Avenue - The Committee considered preliminary plans for an addition to a pre-1941 single family residence. The Committee stated that the work proposed was a vast improvement, but expressed concern that the addition may take away from the historic structure. Existing trees were noted of being important to retain. Requested applicant to consider extending the porch. b. 115 N. Santa Cruz Avenue - The Committee considered a preliminary site plan regarding additions and/or renovations to the historic Coggeshall mansion site. The following comments were raised by the Committee: • Don't touch the existing building. • Recommend providing a model. • Applicant is on the right track. The concept is attractive. • Site currently feels foreboding. A development proposal should make the site appealing to venture into. • Providing buildings at the front and keeping the prominence of the main building is positive. • Retail on the street is important. • Landscaping can create a mystery to attract people. • Side buildings should not obscure the mansion. • Consider transparent corner buildings. • Any new building shall complement the mansion and site. • Preserve major trees. • Obtain a good landscape architect. • Preserve wrought iron fence. • Corner buildings should be different. • Site should be inviting all day, not just an evening experience. • Provide sections to show different levels. • Look at relating entrances closer to the street. C. Residential Design Guidelines - Pacheco will work on the books for the bibliography. ITEM 8. APPROVAL OF MINUTES The minutes from the meeting of March 1, 2006 were passed unanimously. ITEM 9. STATUS OF PREVIOUS APPLICATIONS Bally informed the Committee on the status of previous applications. ITEM 10: ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned at 8:00 P.M. to the next regularly meeting on May 3, 2006. Prepared by: Sandy L. Bally, Associate Planner Approved by: Kendra Burch, Chair N:\DEV\IIPCminutes\2006\4-5-06.wpd NOTICE TOWN OF LOS GATOS ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REVIEW RECEIVED MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION DEC 2 2007 Lead Agency: Town of Los Gatos TOWN OF LOS GATOS Community Development Department 110 East Main Street Los Gatos, CA 95031 Project Title and Location: 115 North Santa Cruz Avenue and 112 Wilder Avenue Subdivision Application M-07-005, General Plan Amendment GP-07-01, Zone Change Z-07-001, Conditional Use Permit U-07-020, Variance Application V-07-01, Negative Declaration ND-07-10 Project Description: The project site is comprised of two parcels totaling 25,476 square feet (s.f.) or 0.59 acre (North Santa Cruz Parcel: 14,230 s.f.; Wilder Parcel: 11,246 s.f.). The project applicant is requesting approval of the following: ■ Lot Line Adjustment (Subdivision Application): Adjust the rear lot line of the North Santa Cruz parcel to include a portion of the Wilder parcel so that parking spaces serving the existing and proposed commercial uses on the North Santa Cruz parcel would be located on this same parcel. The North Santa Cruz parcel would be enlarged to 18,101, s.f. (0.42 acre), while the Wilder parcel would be reduced to 7,375 s.f. (0.17 acre). ■ General Plan Amendment and Zone Change: Amend the General Plan from Low Density Residential to Central Business Distri ct and the Zoning Ordinance from R-1D:LHP to C-2:LHP for the portion of the Wilder parcel that would become part of the North Santa Cruz parcel and used for parking. ■ Convert Existing Parking Lot to Residential Lot (Variance Application): Convert the existing parking lot located on the Wilder parcel to a residential lot, currently designated in the General Plan as Medium Density Residential and zoned C-2:LHP and R-1D:LHP. Such conversion would remove 13 on-site parking spaces used in the Parking Assessment District calculations. ■ Modify Use of Existing Coggeshall Mansion and Add Two Commercial Buildings (Conditional Use Permit): Convert an existing fine dining restaurant into a smaller fine dining restaurant on the first floor and office space on the second floor; add two detached commercial buildings in front (east) of the existing structure on the North Santa Cruz parcel; and modify the exterior of the existing historic structure. On the North Santa Cruz parcel, these approvals would allow for addition of two, single-story, detached commercial buildings along the North Santa Cruz Avenue property frontage. The proposed South Building would be 1,176 square feet and located in the southeast corner of the North Santa Cruz parcel. The proposed North Building would be 424 square feet and located on this parcel's northeast corner. In addition to the two new buildings, the interior of the existing Coggeshall Mansion would be modified to allow for reduction in the existing restaurant and conversion of the second floor to office space. There would also be minor changes to the exterior of the mansion (e.g., add new canvas awning, replace existing windows with French doors, and replace existing portico, deck and stairs with new dining deck DECEMBER, 2007 MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION - 115 NORTH SANTA CRUZ AVENUE AND 112 WILDER AVENUE and stairs on the front of the mansion; replace existing window with exit door and stairs on the rear of the building). The proposed Lot Line Adjustment would expand this parcel so that the existing six parking spaces would be located on the same parcel and four more spaces would be added for a total of 10 parking spaces. The existing trash enclosure would be relocated to the east to accommodate these three additional spaces. On the Wilder parcel, these approvals would allow removal of the existing parking lot, which currently provides 16 parking spaces and the trash enclosure, and future development of a single-family residence. The proposed plan indicates that a two-car garage for the residence and two guest spaces (located east of the garage) would be located on the east end of this parcel, adjacent to the alleyway. Determination: Although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures listed below have been added to the project, mitigating potential impacts to a less-than-significant level. An Environmental Impact Report will not be required. Statement of Reasons to Support Finding: 1. Aesthetics: The project would involve a lot line adjustment for two adjoining parcels fronting on Wilder and North Santa Cruz avenues, with the development of a new residential structure and garage on the Wilder Avenue parcel currently used for parking. The design plans for the new residence have not been formulated; however, the proposed project specifies a future garage and two guest parking spaces to be accessed from the alleyway separating the two parcels. The project plans propose the construction of two new single-story, retail commercial buildings in the front yard area of the Coggeshall Mansion property on North Santa Cruz Avenue. The planned commercial structures would be located in the northeast and southeast corners of the North Santa Cruz parcel, with a remaining open garden area separating the two structures and providing partial views and access from North Santa Cruz Avenue to the restaurant use in the historic mansion. The South Building would be 1,176 square feet in size and have a maximum height of 15.5 feet above grade, while the North Building would be 424 square feet with a maximum height of 14 feet above grade. The proposed South Building height would be approximately similar to that of the commercial building (Design & Interiors of Los Gatos) adjoining the project site to the south along North Santa Cruz Avenue. The height of the North Building would be lower than that of the US Bank building adjoining the site to the north. In addition to the two new buildings, the interior of the existing Coggeshall Mansion would be modified to allow for reduction in the existing restaurant use and conversion of the second floor to office space. There would also be minor changes to the exterior of the mansion, e.g. the addition of new canvas awnings, replacement of existing windows with French doors, new exterior stairs on the west and north sides of the building, etc. An existing portico and deck used for dining would be replaced with a new dining deck between the existing mansion building and the proposed South Building. Views of the project site are primarily available from pedestrians and vehicles traveling along North Santa Cruz Avenue and Wilder Avenue, east and west of the subject parcels, respectively. Both parcels are visible from the alleyway separating the two subject parcels. The views from Wilder Avenue are of a parking lot with a background view of the Coggeshall Mansion's rear fagade. Views of the Coggeshall Mansion from North Santa Cruz Avenue constitute the principal visual resource of project site. The mansion is designated as a historical resource (No. HD-75-6) in Los Gatos since it represents a classic example of a Nineteenth Century Eastlake Victorian. It is the only remaining structure of many that once lined the west side of North Santa Cruz Avenue. DECEMBER, 2007 2 MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION - 115 NORTH SANTA CRUZ AVENUE AND 112 WILDER AVENUE In order to assess the potential effects of the proposed project on the visual character of the project site, the Town required a peer review of the project design plans by the Town's contract architectural consultant, Cannon Design Group (CDG). CDG reviewed the project plans and prepared a report (April 20, 2007) detailing potential concerns with the design submitted to the Town and providing design options to address these issues. The peer review report did not address potential design issues for the residential component of the project plans since no specific residential design plans have been submitted to the Town. CDG made no firm recommendations for the modification of the project design, and noted that the aesthetic effects of the project's proposed design on the site's character and the mansion's historic setting were a matter of value judgments to be decided by Town staff, the Historical Preservation Committee, and the Planning Commission. The CDG report is included as Attachment 1 of the Initial Study. Briefly, the CDG review presented four options that would reduce the impacts of the project design as previously submitted to the Town. These include: 1) no project development; 2) limit additional commercial development to one structure; 3) reduce the North Building size; and 4) modify the design of the North Building. The project design was revised in response to the recommendations of the CDG peer review and submitted to the Town for further review and approval. The revised design included minor modification of the South Building, entailing the removal of a rooftop architectural element and a reconfiguration in the alignment of the North Building. The North Building was planned in an east - west orientation to permit more visibility of the Coggeshall Mansion from North Santa Cruz Avenue. CDG reviewed the revised design (September 24, 2007; included in Attachment 1 of the Initial Study) and concluded that while the design was much improved, there were still three concerns: The roof form of the proposed South Building is very awkward at the south property boundary, with the odd angle to the end, partly a result of trying to achieve the maximum building square footage at an angled property line. In some cases that might be acceptable, but CDG indicates the historic quality of the Coggeshall Mansion deserves a more classic and complete design solution. CDG recommends that roof form relate more directly to the north end of this building, requiring some adjustment for the location and/or form of building element on the west side of this structure. ■ Proposed location of the entry gable so close to the south end of the building seems awkward and out of character for this type of structure. CDG recommends moving the entry northward, as indicated in the Recommendations diagram (Attachment 1 of the Initial Study). ■ CDG is concerned with the use of stucco for wall materials and recommends that strong consideration be given to the use of a wood frame and panel system for the walls, relating them strongly to the window system and the wood of the existing Coggeshall Mansion on the site. CDG recommends that the proposed building designs visually relate more to the historic mansion than to the adjacent stucco buildings. Views of the North Santa Cruz Avenue parcel and the Coggeshall Mansion would change from a full view of the estate structure and front yard landscaping to a partially obstructed view of the building. The proposed one-story South Building would block views of the mansion's single-story southern wing. The smaller North Building would be located in the northeast corner of the project site and its location and size would preserve views of the main entrance and two-story fayade of the mansion along the North Santa Cruz Avenue frontage. The protection of the historic structures' character and settings would be subject to the provisions of the Town's Commercial Design Guidelines and the Town Code pertaining to LHP properties. Page 6 of these guidelines, Designated Landmarks, indicates that Appendix C identifies Individual Historic Landmarks within commercial areas that are subject to these design guidelines. Appendix C, page 83 of these DECEMBER, 2007 MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION- 115 NORTH SANTA CRUZ AVENUE AND 112 WILDER AVENUE guidelines, lists HD-75-6, Coggeshall Mansion, 115 North Santa Cruz Avenue as one of the commercial buildings or properties that are not located within one of the Town's historic districts that have been designated as historical landmarks by the Town of Los Gatos. These guidelines contain a clear statement of community expectations to assist property and business owners in understanding the Town and commercial development features that assist in defining the overall ambience and sense of place that contribute so strongly to the livability and economic vitality of Los Gatos. The guidelines are intended to establish a balance that preserves and enhances the Town's livability while supporting the economic vitality that provides the resources for community services and the uses that make Los Gatos a complete community. To assist the Town in its efforts to achieve a high level of design quality and preserve the historic design characteristics important to the community, the Town Municipal Code provides for a Historic Preservation Committee to advise the Planning Commission. The Historic Preservation Committee reviewed a preliminary project design on April 5, 2006 to determine whether the conceptual project design is consistent with the requirements of the Commercial Design Guidelines and goals of the Town for historic landmarks. At that time (April 5, 2006), the Committee provided direction for the project applicant to ensure that the proposed design complies with the goals and objectives for the preservation of the historic landmark property. In general, the comments of the Committee supported the conceptual project design. During meetings on March 21 and September 19, 2007, the Historic Preservation Committee considered plans for the proposed project and determined that development of two detached structures would be acceptable for the project site and had the following three comments regarding the proposed structures: ■ The southern structure should be redesigned to be more subservient (regarding style, scale and mass), to the mansion; ■ Consider a more transparent building; and ■ The context of the mansion shall be protected. Additionally, the Committee determined that the proposed exterior staircase on the mansion would be acceptable. Consequently, introduction of two new commercial buildings on the grounds of the project site would be considered to have a less-than-significant impact on the aesthetic character of the property. Further design review required by the Town for this project would enforce the historic preservation objectives as presented in the Town's Commercial Design Guidelines. Views of the project site's Wilder Avenue parcel are available from existing single-family residences located to the north, south, and west on Wilder Avenue. Current views of the existing parking lot would change to views of a single-family residence similar to those presently surrounding the site. The development of a two-story residence would obstruct existing views across the parking lot to the eastern (back) facade of the Coggeshall Mansion. The replacement of existing parking lot and mansion views with views of a proposed residential building would be a less-than-significant change in the surrounding visual character. Visual compatibility of the proposed residence's design with surrounding development will be specifically evaluated during the Architecture and Site review process. 2. Agriculture Resources: The project site is developed with an existing historical structure that would be retained and remodeled for ongoing commercial use. Since the site is not in agricultural use and has no DECEMBER, 2007 4 MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION - 115 NORTH SANTA CRUZ AVENUE AND 112 WILDER AVENUE agricultural potential due to its small size, location, and existing use, the project would not adversely affect any existing agricultural resources or operations. Since the properties surrounding the project site are developed with commercial and residential uses, the proposed project would not adversely affect other agricultural properties or result in the conversion of farmland to non-agricultural use. 3. Air Quality: The project would be consistent with the Bay Area Air Quality Management District's (BAAQMD) most recently adopted regional air quality plan, the Bay Area 2005 Ozone Strategy (BAGS). The consistency of the proposed project with the BAOS is determined by comparing the project's consistency with the Los Gatos General Plan. Since the BAOS is based on population projections of the Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG) that are based on the Town's General Plan in effect at the time the BAOS was approved, consistency of the project with the General Plan would indicate consistency with the BAOS. The proposed retail commercial, office, restaurant, and residential uses would be consistent with the uses allowed on the project site by the Los Gatos General Plan, and therefore, the project would be consistent with the BAOS. The San Francisco Bay Area Air Basin is classified by the BAAQMD as non-attainment for ozone and inhalable particulates (PM,o). According to the Town Engineering Division, the project would generate 471 average daily trips, 8 AM peak hour trips, and 44 PM peak hour trips, which would represent a net reduction in traffic generated at the project site on a daily basis and during the PM peak. Air pollutant emissions associated with the proposed project would likewise decrease and reduced traffic volumes would be below the Bay Area Air Quality Management District's (BAAQMD) threshold levels for potential significance. The BAAQMD threshold levels for potential significance are approximately 2,000 vehicle trips per day or approximately 44,000 square feet of retail commercial space. At or above this size, traffic generated by a project could produce air quality problems, and an air quality impact assessment would need to be prepared and submitted to the BAAQMD for review. Adjacent residential uses are considered to be sensitive receptors. Proposed grading activities would generate short-term emissions of criteria pollutants, including suspended and inhalable particulate matter and equipment exhaust emissions. The project site is approximately 0.59 acre, and therefore, project implementation would result in surface disturbance of less than one acre. The BAAQMD does not require quantification of construction emissions, but considers any project's construction-related impacts to be less than significant if required dust-control measures are implemented. The Town's standard dust control conditions require implementation of the BAAQMD's standard dust control measures (required on sites of three acres or less), which would mitigate the project's construction-related air quality impacts to a less-than-significant level. 4. Biological Resources: The project site is a 0.59-acre property currently developed with a historical structure, landscaped grounds, and a parking lot. The area where the proposed retail commercial buildings would be located is currently developed with landscaping and paved walkways. Vegetation on the site consists of landscape trees, shrubs, and groundcover in the front and side yards of the property, and along the parking lot perimeter. The habitat value of site vegetation is limited to urban-adapted species. Policy O.P.3.3 of the Open Space Element of the Los Gatos General Plan emphasizes preservation of public and private landscaping along Town streets. The Los Gatos Tree Protection Ordinance states that the preferred tree replacement is two or more trees of a species and size designated by the Director of the Parks and Public Works Department. Tree replacement requirements are based on canopy size, which is defined in Table 3-1 of the Ordinance, Tree Canopy - Replacement Standard. Tree canopy replacement requirements range from two to six 24-inch box size trees or two 36-inch and/or 48-inch box size trees, depending on the canopy size of the tree to be removed. DECEMBER, 2007 5 MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION- 115 NORTH SANTA CRUZ AVENUE AND 112 WILDER AVENUE The Town retained Arbor Resources (AR) to conduct a tree inventory and review project plans to determine the project's compliance with the Town's Tree Protection Ordinance. This survey was completed in September 2007, and a copy of this report is included as Attachment 2 of the Initial Study. Arbor Resources' survey identified a total of 10 trees that could be affected by the proposed project, including pittosporum (Pittosporum eugenioides), holly oak (Quercus ilex), coast live oak (Quercus agrifolia), Canary Island date palm (Phoenix canariensis), and coast redwood (Sequoia sempervirens). These trees are either on the project site or in the right-of-way adjoining the site and could be vulnerable to potential damage during project development [Section 29.10.0995(B) of the Town's Municipal Code]. The 10 trees listed in the inventory are Protected Trees (trees with a trunk diameter of four inches or greater) as defined in Section 29.10.0960 of the Town Code. Of the 10 inventoried trees, seven trees (#1, 3, 5, 6, and 8 through 10) would need to be removed due to the project design and implementation. Arbor Resources indicates that proposed removal of the seven trees would be in accordance with Section 29.10.0990 (Standards of Review) of the Town's Municipal Code. In accordance with the Tree Protection Ordinance, Arbor Resources recommends planting of replacement trees to compensate for the loss of trees #3 and 5, a holly oak and date palm (both in fair to good condition). The other five trees to be removed were determined to be hazardous and no mitigation would be required. Pursuant to Section 29.10.0985 of the Town Code, the Parks and Public Works Department will determine specific replanting requirements for replacement trees. The arborist's study also identifies five river birch (Betulus nigra) trees situated in a row along the northern property boundary immediately north of the restaurant. These trees are all Ordinance-size, range in fair to good condition, and have trunk diameters ranging from 4 to 12 inches. A very large redwood with a trunk diameter of 39.5 inches and a canopy spread of 40 feet is located at the rear of the restaurant and appears to be in overall fair health. The Wilder Avenue parcel contains three small redwoods, two large redwoods, one laurel (Umbellularia californica), and one coast live oak on a neighboring site. While project plans avoid disturbance of these trees, the use of the Wilder Avenue property for construction access and staging could place these trees at risk. The Town will require implementation of the following measures to reduce impacts on trees to be retained and adequately replace trees to be removed: MITIGATION: All recommendations made by Arbor Resources (September 21, 2007) shall be implemented to eliminate or minimize the construction-related impacts on the trees to be retained. Recommendations are listed under Section 4.0, Recommendations, of the arborist's report. These include recommendations under the Design Guidelines section (addressing tree location mapping, protective fencing, building setback, trenching, drainage facilities, and installation of new trees) and the Protection Measures Before and During Construction section (addressing fencing, removal of hardscape, demolition, work within tree canopies, etc.). The report's recommendations are included as Attachment 2 of the Initial Study. MITIGATION MONITORING: The Planning Division of the Community Development Department will be responsible for ensuring that all recommendations made by the arborist are reflected in final project plans. The Parks Division of the Parks and. Public Works Department will be responsible for ensuring that all tree protection measures are properly implemented during construction. 5. Cultural Resources: The project site contains the Coggeshall Mansion, which was designated a historic landmark by the Town in 1975 (No. HD-75-6). The site is listed as a historically, architecturally, or aesthetically significant property since the mansion is: DECEMBER, 2007 MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION - 115 NORTH SANTA CRUZ AVENUE AND 112 WILDER AVENUE "almost classic example of Nineteenth Century Eastlake Victorian with the distinctive type of ornamentation that is the major characteristic of this style. Open front porch, tower, rows of spindles, and woodwork resembling furniture legs. Other distinguishing characteristics are the rectangular shape of the building, and the gable roof." The building was constructed as a residence in 1891. It was converted into a mortuary in 1920 and used as such until 1974. A building addition occurred in the 1970's. The building is presently used for commercial purposes as a restaurant. The structure is the only remaining building of this type that once lined the west side of North Santa Cruz Avenue between Saratoga Avenue and Main Street. Project implementation would result in the conversion of the structure's second story to commercial office use. The eastern portion of the project site is the landscaped front yard of the North Santa Cruz parcel, and contains landscaping as well as a dining deck, portico, and stairs. Portions of the front yard landscaping would be replaced with two new retail commercial structures as well as new landscaping and hardscape, i.e. walkways, patios, etc. The existing dining deck, portico, and stairs would be.replaced with a new dining deck and stairs. The conservation of the Town's historic resources is the subject of the Town Code, Chapter 29 (Zoning Regulations), Sections 29.80.215 through 29.80.320. The purpose of the Historic Preservation and LHP or Landmark and Historic Preservation Overlay Zone is defined in Section 29.80.215(1) - (4). In brief, the Town seeks: "The protection, enhancement, perpetuation and use of structures, sites and areas that are reminders of past eras, events and persons important in local, State, or National history, or which provide significant examples of architectural styles of the past or are landmarks in the history of architecture, or which are unique and irreplaceable assets to the Town and its neighborhoods, or which provide for this and future generations examples of the physical surroundings in which past generations lived." To achieve these goals, Section 29.80.225 of the Town Municipal Code provides for the establishment and functioning of a Historic Preservation Committee. The Committee is composed of professional and lay members that have demonstrated knowledge, competence, or expertise in historic preservation, and acts as an advisory body to the Planning Commission on all matters pertaining to historic preservation. To ensure that the proposed project meets the requirements of the Town Zoning Code and all relevant guidelines, the Historic Preservation Committee reviewed a preliminary project design on April 5, 2006. At that time, the Committee provided direction for the project applicant to ensure that the proposed design complies with the goals and objectives for the preservation of the historic landmark property. In general, the comments of the Committee supported the conceptual project design. During meetings on March 21 and September 19, 2007, the Historic Preservation Committee considered plans for the proposed project and determined that development of two detached structures would be acceptable for the project site and had the following three comments regarding the proposed structures: ■ The southern structure should be redesigned to be more subservient (regarding style, scale and mass), to the mansion; ■ Consider a more transparent building; and ■ The context of the mansion shall be protected. DECEMBER, 2007 7 MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION - 115 NORTH SANTA CRUZ AVENUE AND 112 WILDER AVENUE Additionally, the Committee determined that the proposed exterior staircase on the mansion would be acceptable. Consequently, introduction of two new commercial buildings on the grounds of the project site would be considered to have a less than significant impact on the character of the historic landmark property. Further design review required by the Town for this project would enforce the historic preservation objectives as presented in the Town's Commercial Design Guidelines. The directions identified by the Historic Preservation Committee (April 5, 2006) for the proposed project are included in Attachment 3 of the Initial Study. Since, the project site is already developed, surface soils were disturbed during construction of existing development on the subject property in the late lYh century. Although the site is not located adjacent to Los Gatos Creek, the potential for encountering cultural resources cannot be completely eliminated due to the site's historic character and relatively level topography. In addition, the project would potentially involve trenching for removal and/or relocation utility lines. Therefore, the following mitigation measures will be required: MITIGATION: In the event that archaeological traces are encountered, all construction within a 50-meter radius of the find shall be halted, the Community Development Director shall be notified, and an archaeologist shall be retained to examine the find and make appropriate recommendations. MITIGATION: If human remains are discovered, the Santa Clara County Coroner shall be notified. The Coroner shall determine whether or not the remains are Native American. If the Coroner determines that the remains are not subject to his authority, he shall notify the Native American Heritage Commission, who shall attempt to identify descendants of the deceased Native Americans. MITIGATION: If the Community Development Director finds that the archaeological find is not a significant resource, work may resume only after the submittal of a preliminary archaeological report and after provisions for reburial and ongoing monitoring are accepted. Provisions for identifying descendants of a deceased Native American and for reburial shall follow the protocol set forth in CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5(e). If the site is found to be a significant archaeological site, a mitigation program shall be prepared and submitted to the Community Development Director for consideration and approval, in conformance with the protocol set forth in Public Resources Code Section 21083.2. MITIGATION: A final report shall be prepared when a find is determined to be a significant archaeological site, and/or when Native American remains are found on the site. The final report shall include background information on the completed work, a description and list of identified resources, the disposition and curation of these resources, any testing, other recovered information, and conclusions. MITIGATION MONITORING: The Planning and Building Divisions of the Community Development Department will be responsible for ensuring that these measures are implemented appropriately during construction as the need arises. 6. Geology and Soils: A review of the Town's hazards maps indicates that the project site has moderate shrink-swell potential, low potential for liquefaction, high potential for fault rupture, and moderate potential for seismic shaking. No debris flow hazards were identified for the site. The Town's Fault Map indicates that the site is located in an area of "concentration of coseismic ground deformation" and lineation indicative of faulting (linear depression) is mapped as traversing the site. DECEMBER, 2007 MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION - 115 NORTH SANTA CRUZ AVENUE AND 112 WILDER AVENUE The Town's hazards maps also indicate the site has a slight to moderate erosion hazard. The proposed grading plan indicates approximately 64 cubic yards would be graded (average depth of seven inches) to achieve a two percent slope across the proposed plaza. Town Conditions of Approval will include preparation and implementation of interim and final erosion control plans, which will reduce potential erosion hazards to less than significant. At a minimum, the proposed retail commercial buildings would be expected to be subject to strong ground shaking during their design life. However, it should be noted that most of the Bay Area as well as surrounding residences are subject to ground shaking hazards. As a standard project condition, the Town will require preparation of a soil engineering report; this report will address any soil engineering constraints and specify criteria and standards in accordance with the Uniform Building Code (UBC) for site grading, drainage, pavement design, retaining wall design, erosion control, and foundation design. Assuming all recommendations of this required report are incorporated into the project design, no significant impacts from soil engineering constraints would be anticipated. By implementing applicable UBC requirements and sound engineering practices, the Los Gatos General Plan EIR determined that proposed development would be at no higher risk of potentially significant impacts due to seismically- induced ground failure from seismic shaking than any other similarly situated area. However, due to the identified high potential for fault rupture, the following measure will be required to reduce potential ground rupture and related seismic impacts to a less-than-significant level: MITIGATION: A geotechnical investigation shall be conducted for this project to determine the surface and subsurface soil conditions at the site, as well as to determine the potential for surface fault rupture on the site, particularly with respect to proposed building locations. The geotechnicai study shall provide recommendations for site grading as well as the design of foundations, retaining walls, concrete slab-on-grade construction, excavation, drainage, on-site utility trenching and pavement sections. The project shall incorporate all recommendations of the investigation into project plans. MITIGATION MONITORING: The Building Division of the Community Development and Engineering Division of the Parks and Public Works Departments will be responsible for ensuring that this investigation is completed and all recommendations are incorporated into the project design and properly implemented during construction. 7. Hazards and Hazardous Materials: The project site is currently developed with a historic structure, parking lot, and landscaping. Historic records indicate the building was constructed in 1891. From 1891 to 1920, the building was a residence; in 1920, it was converted to a mortuary and used for this purpose until 1974. The building received its historic landmark designation in 1975 and has been used since that time for commercial activities, including its current use as a restaurant. The former mortuary use could be a potential environmental concern due to any accidental release of the chemicals used for mortuary procedures. Since these chemicals were not used on the property after conversion of the building for other commercial purposes in 1975, and there were no reported incidences of chemicals being encountered during construction of subsequent modifications on the site, the potential presence of these chemicals on the site would not appear to be a significant environmental concern at this time. The second story of the historic mansion would be remodeled to accommodate proposed commercial office uses. If the structure contains asbestos or lead-containing paint, renovation could result in airborne release of hazardous building materials, such as asbestos fibers or lead dust. Proposed renovation will be required to comply with state and federal regulations for inspection and removal of hazardous building materials, including asbestos-containing materials and lead-containing substances. If found to be present in building materials to be removed, asbestos and/or lead abatement practices such as containment and DECEMBER, 2007 9 MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION - 115 NORTH SANTA CRUZ AVENUE AND 112 WILDER AVENUE removal would be required prior to renovation. In addition, the project applicant will be required to obtain clearance for asbestos removal from the Bay Area Air Quality Management District prior to issuance of a demolition permit. Therefore, with implementation of existing regulations, the potential for public health hazards associated with the release of airborne asbestos fibers at the project site would be less than significant. In addition to implementing asbestos abatement requirements, the project sponsor will be required to implement the following additional measure to mitigate other public health risks associated with lead-based paints to a less-than-significant level: MITIGATION: A state certified lead-based paint professional shalt be retained to perform a lead-based paint survey of the existing structure and the recommendations of the professional shall be followed for abatement of any identified lead-based paint prior to renovation of the structure. MITIGATION MONITORING: The Building Division of the Community Development will be responsible for ensuring this measure is properly implemented during construction. 8. Hydrology and Water Quality: Storm Drainage. Presently, the 0.59-acre (25,476 square feet) project site is developed with commercial uses and a parking lot. Existing facilities and paving on the North Santa Cruz Avenue parcel cover 11,763 square feet, approximately 83% of the site. The project site is a level parcel with storm runoff draining from the property as sheet flows to North Santa Cruz Avenue and the alleyway behind the building. Runoff flows on North Santa Cruz Avenue enter the municipal storm drain system through catch basins along the street, and are collected and conveyed by the street's storm drain. Overland flows in the alleyway drain toward Nicholson Avenue and enter the municipal storm drain system north of the project site. Storm water runoff from the project site's impervious surfaces flows into the Town of Los Gatos storm drain system, discharging into Los Gatos Creek, and ultimately draining northward into San Francisco Bay. The project plans indicate that the proposed development would increase impervious surfaces from existing levels to 13,286 square feet, resulting in total coverage of approximately 93 percent of the site. Based on the design plans, the proposed project would increase impervious coverage by approximately 10 percent. However, it should be noted that the project site's Wilder parcel is extensively paved for parking lot use with minor landscape areas along the perimeter of the parcel. These existing impervious surfaces would be removed as part of the residential development proposed for this site and partially replaced with the impervious surfaces of the residential structure. The removal of impervious parking lot surfaces for future front, side, and rear yard landscaped areas would partially offset the new impervious surface area associated with the proposed commercial structures on the North Santa Cruz Avenue parcel. Consequently, the project design would result in a negligible change in the amount of impervious surfaces on the project site overall. Since existing downstream storm drain facilities adequately accommodate current storm runoff flows and the proposed project would result in minimal increases in peak surface flows at the site, the proposed project would not affect the existing storm drainage system capacities and would have no significant adverse impacts on runoff flows from the project site. Flood Hazards. According to Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps for the project area, the project site is not within the 100-year floodplain. The Santa Clara Valley Water District's Maps of flood control facilities and limits of one percent flooding as well as the Town of Los Gatos Safety Element Flood Plain maps show the project site does not lie within a flood zone. Therefore, no significant flood hazard impacts would be anticipated. Water Quality. More stringent water quality regulations of the Clean Water Act have recently been triggered because the NPDES (National Pollution Discharge Elimination System) permit program has DECEMBER, 2007 10 MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION - 115 NORTH SANTA CRUZ AVENUE AND 112 WILDER AVENUE failed to protect beneficial uses of Santa Clara County's creeks and the South San Francisco Bay, as evidenced by such observations as violations of ambient water quality criteria, high concentrations of toxic substances, and fish consumption health advisories. These new regulations require that all discharges shall comply with Provision C.3, New and Redevelopment Performance Standards of Order No. 01-024 of the NPDES permit program. The project site is located within the Los Gatos Creek watershed. Runoff from the site would discharge to the Town's storm drains in Santa Cruz Avenue, flowing into Los Gatos Creek and eventually into the Bay. Los Gatos Creek is on the Clean Water Act Section 303(d) List of Water Quality Limited Segments due to the presence of diazinon, a pesticide, and its primary source is identified as urban runoff and storm drains. Best Management Practices (BMPs) outlined by the Santa Clara Valley Urban Runoff Pollution Prevention Program (SCVURPPP) for treatment control of pesticides include bioretention, infiltration, and media filter with adsorption/absorption as the removal process. As a condition of project approval, the Town will require: (1) preparation and submittal of interim and final erosion control plans to the Engineering Division of the Parks and Public Works Department; and (2) implementation of non-point source pollution prevention measures to reduce pollutant levels in the water that will eventually discharge to Los Gatos Creek. Since the project would create or replace less than 10,000 square feet of impervious surface area, the Town has determined that the proposed project is not subject to the provisions of C.3. However, the Town will require surface runoff to be directed into landscaped areas and splash blocks to be installed on downspouts. These requirements are consistent with current non-point source requirements and erosion control portions of the NPDES permit program. 9. Land Use and Planning: The project site is currently developed with a historic structure, paved parking lot, and landscaping. The North Santa Cruz parcel is currently designated by the General Plan as "CBD - Central Business District" while the Wilder parcel is designated "Medium Density Residential, 5 to 12 dwelling units per acre." The CBD General Plan designation encourages "a mixture of community- oriented commercial goods, services and lodging, that is unique in its accommodation of small town style merchants and the maintenance of a small town feel and character." This designation also calls for maintaining and expanding landscaped open spaces and mature tree growth without increasing setbacks, and integrating new construction with existing structures of historical or architectural significance and emphasizes the importance of the pedestrian. The Medium Density Residential General Plan designation provides for multiple-family residential, duplex, and/or small single-family homes. The proposed development of retail commercial and office space on the North Santa Cruz parcel and a single-family residence on the Wilder parcel would appear to be consistent with these designations. However, the project proposal would modify lot lines so that the parking spaces associated with the North Santa Cruz parcel would become part of this parcel, requiring a General Plan amendment from "Medium Density Residential" to "Central Business District" on the portion of the site where parking spaces would be located. The North Santa Cruz parcel is zoned C-2:LHP, Central Business District Commercial Zone with Landmark and Historic Preservation Overlay Zone. Permitted uses in the C-2 Zone include retail commercial, personal service business, and office activities. The Wilder parcel is zoned R-1D:LHP, Single-Family Residential Zone, with Landmark and Historic Preservation Overlay Zone. Permitted uses in the R-1 Zone include single-family dwellings, residential care facilities, small family day care homes. Proposed retail commercial, office and residential uses would be consistent with uses allowed in these zones. However, since the project proposal would modify lot lines so that the parking spaces associated with the North Santa Cruz parcel would become part of this parcel, a zoning amendment from R-1D:LHP to CBD is proposed on the portion of the site where parking spaces would be located. DECEMBER, 2007 11 MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION - 115 NORTH SANTA CRUZ AVENUE AND 112 WILDER AVENUE Both project parcels have the LHP Overlay Zone. The purpose of this overlay zone is to protect structures or areas with special historical, architectural, or aesthetic interest from being destroyed or impaired despite the feasibility of preserving them. See discussion under Sections I and III, Aesthetics and Cultural Resources for more discussion of the project's impact on the historic and aesthetic values of the historic structure on the site, the Coggeshall Mansion. The proposed project would introduce new retail commercial, office and residential uses on the project site. The project vicinity is comprised of a mix of commercial and residential uses. There are retail and service commercial uses adjacent to the North Santa Cruz parcel (to the north, south, and east) and proposed development of retail commercial and office uses on this parcel would be consistent with the existing mix of uses. There are residential uses adjacent to the Wilder Avenue parcel (to the north, south, and west), and proposed residential development on this parcel would be consistent with surrounding residential uses. Therefore, no land use compatibility problems would be expected. 10. Mineral Resources: The Los Gatos General Plan does not identify any regionally or locally- important mineral resources on the project site or in its vicinity. 11. Noise: Construction Noise. The Town Noise Ordinance (Chapter 16) restricts construction activities to the hours of 8:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. on weekdays and 9:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. on weekends and holidays. This ordinance also limits noise generation to 85 dBA at the property line or 85 dBA at 25 feet. Project construction would result in temporary short-term noise increases due to the operation of heavy equipment. Construction noise sources range from about 82 to 90 dBA at 25 feet for most types of construction equipment, and slightly higher levels of about 94 to 97 dBA at 25 feet for certain types of earthmoving and impact equipment. If noise controls are installed on construction equipment, the noise levels could be reduced to 80 to 85 dBA at 25 feet, depending on the type of equipment. With controls, construction noise levels could be made to comply with the Town Noise Ordinance. Residential uses are generally considered to be noise-sensitive uses or sensitive receptors. There are two existing residences located adjacent to the Wilder parcel, and one of these residences is also located adjacent to the western boundary of the North Santa Cruz parcel. Both of these residential properties adjoin existing off-street parking spaces on the project site. Construction of the future residence could occur as close as 25 feet from these two residences, while reconfiguration of the parking spaces adjacent to the alleyway could occur as close as 50 feet from one of these residences. At 25 feet, the ordinance noise limit (85 dBA at 25 feet) would result in maximum noise levels of 85 dBA, while at 50 feet, maximum noise levels would be 79 dBA. Temporary disturbance (e.g., speech interference) can occur if the noise level in the interior of a building exceeds 45 to 60 dBA. To maintain such interior noise levels, exterior noise levels at the closest residences (with windows closed) should not exceed 70 to 80 dBA and this exterior noise level is used as a significance threshold or criterion. Maximum construction noise levels could periodically exceed this threshold, particularly when heavy equipment associated with construction of the future residence on the Wilder parcel is operating closer than 50 feet of these residences. However, existing fencing along the boundaries adjoining these two residences would serve as noise barriers and help reduce construction-related noise at these residences. Given the limited duration of construction associated with one home, enforcement of time restrictions and noise level standards contained in the Town Noise Ordinance would help to maintain construction noise levels at acceptable levels and limit duration when speech interference effects could occur, reducing potential construction- related noise impacts to less than significant. Operational Noise. Adjacent residences are currently subject to noise from cars parking in the existing parking lot on the Wilder parcel and existing parking spaces adjacent to the alleyway. Since the project would reduce the number of parking spaces, noise from parking cars would decrease with the proposed project. Although the project would add seven parking spaces adjacent to the alleyway, parking-related DECEMBER. 2007 12 MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION - 115 NORTH SANTA CRUZ AVENUE AND 112 WILDER AVENUE noise already occurs in this vicinity since there are already six existing parking spaces in the same area. Therefore, proposed reconfiguration of parking spaces on the western portion of the project site would not significantly increase operational noise. The proposed reduction in the size of the existing restaurant use would also reduce the number of cars parking and traveling along the alleyway during the more noise- sensitive late evening hours. The proposed retail and office uses are not expected to generate traffic during the late evening hours. 12. Population and Housing: The proposed project would result in the construction of one single-family residence on the Wilder parcel, and would not result in intensification of residential uses or significantly increase local or regional population. No existing housing units would be displaced by the project. The project would also construct two retail commercial buildings on the site and provide commercial office space in the second story of the Coggeshall Mansion, which is currently occupied by a commercial use. The project would not be considered growth inducing since the project would involve redevelopment of an existing developed parcel and the project would not extend roads or infrastructure to any adjacent properties. Adjacent parcels are already developed with retail commercial and residential uses. 13. Public Services: Public safety services are already provided to the existing restaurant on the project site as well as to adjacent commercial and residential uses. Increased demand for schools and recreational services by the proposed single-family residence would be less than significant, while the proposed retail commercial and office uses would generate no demand for school and recreational services in the community. No significant increase in demand on public services would occur with the proposed project. Police protection services are currently being provided to the existing restaurant on the site and surrounding retail commercial and residential uses. With the proposed project, these services would extend to the proposed retail commercial buildings and single-family residence on the project site, which would be a less-than-significant increase in demand for these services. The Santa Clara County Fire Department has reviewed the proposed plan for site access and water supply, and the project will be required to meet Department requirements for minimum fire flow, automatic fire sprinklers, and premise identification. The project will be required to install an automatic fire sprinkler system. The proposed plan will be subject to formal plan review by the Santa Clara County Fire Department to determine compliance with adopted model codes. 14. Recreation: The proposed addition of one residential unit would incrementally add new population to the area, and thereby increase the demand for recreational services. This incremental increase would not be expected to be significant given the small size of the project. I.S. Transportation and Traffic: Trip Generation. The Town's Traffic Impact Policy (Resolution 1991- 174) requires preparation of a detailed traffic study for any project with the potential to generate 20 or more additional AM or PM peak hour trips. The existing restaurant on the project property currently generates traffic from the existing 198-seat restaurant (566 average daily trips, 6 AM peak hour trips, and 55 PM peak hour trips). Since the project sponsor proposes to reduce the size of the restaurant (135 seats) while adding 1,600 square feet of retail space and 1,262 square feet of office space, the project would result in a net reduction in traffic generated at the project site on a daily basis and during the PM peak hour (471 average daily trips, 8 AM peak hour trips, and 44 PM peak hour trips). Therefore, the proposed project would have no impact on the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system nor would it contribute to cumulative impacts on existing intersection or roadways level of service operation in the project vicinity. Parking. At present, there are 22 parking spaces on the project site (16 spaces are in the parking lot adjacent to Wilder Avenue, while six spaces are adjacent to the alleyway) and 44 parking spaces in the Parking Assessment District (PAD), or a total of 66 parking spaces. The project proposal would DECEMBER, 2007 13 MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION - 115 NORTH SANTA CRUZ AVENUE AND 112 WILDER AVENUE reconfigure the two project parcels so that the six existing on-site parking spaces adjacent to the alleyway would be located on the same North Santa Cruz parcel and seven more on-site spaces would be added on both sides of the alleyway, for a total of 13 on-site parking spaces on the North Santa Cruz parcel. The proposed project would result in a net reduction of nine on-site parking spaces. With the 44 PAD spaces, the project would have a total of 57 parking spaces. Along with the project's trip generation, its parking demand would also decrease. The Town will require provision of 57 spaces (45 spaces for the 135-seat restaurant; six spaces for the retail space; and six spaces of the office space) and the project would meet this parking requirement. On the Wilder parcel, the proposed plan indicates that a two-car garage for the future residence and two guest spaces (located east of the garage) would be located adjacent to the alleyway. The Town's Zoning Ordinance would require provision of two parking spaces for the future home and the project would meet this requirement. Safety Hazards. The project would eliminate the parking lot driveway on Wilder Avenue, reducing the potential for traffic conflicts at this driveway. The project, however, would add I1 parking spaces (four residential spaces and seven commercial spaces) directly adjacent to the existing alleyway, and vehicles would back out of these spaces directly into the alleyway. These spaces are perpendicular to the alleyway and could increase delays for vehicles using the alley as a result of an increased number of parking maneuvers along this section of the alleyway. Given the narrow width of this alley and presence of similar parking spaces along this alleyway, travel speeds are low and therefore, potential increases in safety hazards posed by the proposed parking space configuration would be less than significant. 16. Utilities and Service Systems: Utilities are currently provided to the project site and adjoining commercial and residential uses. The proposed retail commercial buildings and single-family residence would be required to connect to the existing water and sewer lines in North Santa Cruz Avenue or Wilder Avenue, both located adjacent to the site. No major off-site utility improvements would be expected to be required for development of the project's commercial and residential buildings. Project development would also include construction of storm drainage facilities (see Section VIII, Hydrology and Water Quality). The Fire Department will require provision of an approved, automatic fire sprinkler system in the proposed building. Other utilities (electrical, gas, telephone, cable TV facilities) will be upgraded as necessary. Copies of the Initial Study used to make the above recommendation are on file and available for public inspection during regular business hours at the Town Community Development Department, 110 East Main Street, Los Gatos, California. r4 Z,& q-- Date Bud N. Lortz, Director of Community Development DECEMBER, 2007 14 O ti O 0 Z m ° c m Q N r a = J/ m CL m O 0 Z Q> N O z~ O N = C 0 C ~ Z O W N O ~ Q a C O O p C C O .E L L L U 0 T = fl,j C 0= O O O O ~ a) C. 1 E O p - O O Q Q 5 _ N E a) 0 E Z o, Q a° cn O ro Co U) o a' o o -O 0 a) O o a) 2 C) ',L , O -0 Q C Q Cr O t6 -0 Q 0 C Q L L _0 CL =3 'E a) U O ca a) U CT a) O U C m = 0 m O = p CD -0 a) C .L N = O C6 a) cp 'C Q -0 = a) RS Co >1 U O C n U> = E C O a) m c c - o 3 0 U U E ' a) . O U E m Z o m ~ •w - ~ e CO CD o CA C C° C (6 C L a) w Q _ N . 4 O p) N L E o a) D) fn m O mQ q-- tsf ° o a) N " ° Co N ° E ~ -0 C=- N = U O U C6 C> 'O C O Z 0 _ co O .0 m m L U O C C ) o u o O y to w 0 a) -C m a) 0. cn C° O C C O a) C C 1- ( to Z CD M 0 U) v o U U) a) " moo E EE ID < a) oCD Q) va° m m 'n Q x >1 a) c~ 4- m o C o ° ° co "D 0 ~ O Co a) > E m c m c o > E~ o o ) w 0 Co L> -0 - a) L C = m = o Z _ C: cc m e ° o o C7 to a ~0 C a)~~ L y'QC ~w Q w o od a) o co E 0 g M 0 m o f L m o Co N C1 o . 3 O - - U o ~ o ° ° ~ = O (D = 0 Lit L 2 0- _ p 0 ~ 0 o ~ E O N:E5 m 0 C" C 0) . w 6~ •T :3 a) E in o o m C O U O 6 U L U E O N E C E a) N a) a) U 0 E" C o v O V jj L _ ..O O O " , _ X-- E C L (6 E 2 L 0 Y L M c L o v c o 0 O O U N O O C CO M C > O O O M r f a) C U ~ O O D O . U- CD - C O ' N` Q) 0 Q O 0 p co O L ~'Q 7 ,4_ i° tf O o t6 g O CV o 0 c~ O E o v C . ° y a 'vo m c U L a -t5 > ca Q o o ° ca Q CU o a) m a) a > . a) o -E o C IL < U) o - N U) N 0 O O 0 V ~ N m y 0 a + L ~ f0 ! L I O v O c.) U Y• IX) U U) c C O E ° z Cl) W C) z M O r EYRIBIT 9 Z J a Z O Z O Z Q Q 00 O O N ro c ro W Q 0 U a) O 0 ro E o E ~ U O 0 a) ` 0 a) O _ ~ - U a) 0- a) Q o O 0) O c O 0) r Q U -0 C C a- O U V) O 7 0 0 W O a .SG 0 - C E C: E al O Z~ Q E O U O O Q U E O 4- U L I U) j (D O O a p U Q 0 j U (D d a) _ " 0 ro c 0 z cu ro ro c) Q u, o cts c U o c0 c N o ro m was o o a) o o m~ o ` o.. Q c c Q ~ LB Q o c Q ` = c a o ro o ro o ro ;o 0 C C: cl) CV O7 S 3 Q v C - p ~'cn O 0 C a) 0 n a) 'in- CL o CI- o to m a' -0 -0 ~ o m W ~ o ~ ° u' J- M 3 c o U ° c a) a) ~ U .O oic c) C o .L o % a O w" c m.C.o c L C O C M O C u! O = U Co ) C!? !`N c6 N p- ~ c T3 Q O O i U a) N a - cn * N a) U c6 to c- 0 o W s a O ro N ro a) _ p) C O C to - a) C O O CD U a3 y C ~ p O N C a) a) a) O L 0) ` C O O tt) _ ` fl ~h C C ID C E C U 0~~ n U ~ 0 Q O f - Co ~ C . a) a) L E C u) 0 U a) CL '0 O N o = CD o U i E C > C- C Z U O ' co 0 :3 (q Q) a) ~ ro(D U 0 a) rO. o a) V C ro X O U f 6 4_ ~ 0 ~ c o ro o E 4- o a) o • c Q cn a) CD Q co a0 c (I w= m m o o c a) o M ~ o m E a) u) C a) U a) 0 0 0 - u) U) 4-. U 0 cu 0 m co (D - Q m '0 0 U) V O 0) o cc ca > a) C 0 V) -0 ~o W O C c c 0 O C 0 0 C 0 ` o LO Q ~ c C U ro O O C N U Q O 2 E o O .p 0 ro a) a) (D 'O U) CD CU Q U 4- U) o a c a) N U 'O a) ro ' E 0) 2i N O -a U ' C: 0 O - tiS C > L U O 0 ro cu a) _ U c to ca c co m c c c ' c c c N cn a) U Q a) Q- a) a M C: o a E m E a) m .0 ° U ` . a) z) E W O ~ U . Q C`II O - to C O p M 4-- O C Co - 0 O U a) C s 0. ro N~ s cc O O L a) a) c w .0 Qa) 0 v) m ~ CB o ' 3: w > QU (D 00) 0 E o 'C) o f iu o o o a o I o C: m 0) o c L) C E c U 0 o aa)i .0 -D ~ C c 3 2 CU a) c aa) m U) C 0 0>- E - O Co C N C C cc O C C C U U - a) 0 tn (D E a) E M 2> o ` - Z ro c Y o co > o U) aa)i ti N E E E E U)) m E m v o E > m o o) o a, c a) Q ui 4C O L p O Q U ` O c aa)) O O H- O O E OU Z_0 ) a) 0 O) -0 O co a) U Ca Q v C Q N OU N N N a) U ID C!~ o Q ~O f- L- U to C- O O 0 cn U VJ a) U m m C~ O = I to 0 y m of O O U U C7 E Q Z vJ W 0 Z m O T ti 9 v z d d Q d N C Q ~ J ~ U' (D Z > O N ° 1_- ° C U Z ° O N c ro Z 2~ z O Tn Q ~ . U' W v a~ o 0 a ° 0 F- C O U C N fl . O CL U E O a'. Q d O E -5 m U (D a i c' - ro d c c6 ° > m -0 o u E! o m a) U 0 U ~ -O N O ~ O ~ CO 7 O U - N 0 ` O 0 O ~ N ~ CL • c ro Q. O 0 = O D * a + u) a5 a) ° O N N Q ro' 0 CL 5- _ a1 C O N CL o N E N Q N N Co O QS 73 . U) m =3 -O CO -0 co -0 o C n -0 a) -p co E o E m 0 o O U E O E o O N C L 1 -0 > ca o 10 a o c Q o ro o ~ ro U ro - ro N O ro a = ro N ro LO U U? c C fl CTS 0) Z Q C~ W 0 Z O C'7 JOHN LIEN ARci-ii,TECT 17 January 2008 Sandy Baily, Planner Town of Los Gatos Planning Dept. 110 East Main Street Los Gatos, California 95030 Variance Request - Parking Reduction 115 North Santa Cruz Avenue/V-07-01 Dear Sandy: IiiECEIVED JAN 1 7 2008 0VVN OF LOS GATOS This letter describes the findings required for reduction of parking for the subject application. As shown in the project plans we are requesting a net reduction of -9- spaces. The land use intensity is also reduced by this application and the resulting required parking vs. proposed parking will be balanced. Per Section 29.20.170 a variance may be granted if it can be determined that (1) there are special circumstances applicable to the property, and (2) that granting of the variance would not constitute a granting of special privileges. The following is provided in support of these findings: 1. The existing parking is on private property and supports an intensity of uses which no longer exists. Denial of the request to reduce the amount of parking would place an undue burden on the property by imposing a parking standard which exceeds that of other similar uses in the downtown, thereby depriving the property of privileges enjoyed by other properties in the vicinity and under the same zoning. 2. The granting of a variance would not constitute a granting of special privileges because other properties iri the vity Have received approval for similar requests, - specifically 245 Almendra Avenue/2007. We appreciate your careful consideration of this request, Sincerely, 1 Jo Lien Santa Cruz Wilder, LLC 9,5~) i~) (l:U?,) 39') 525 EXHIBIT 10 AR 1-11TEC i' 10 January 2008 Sandy Baily, Planner Town of Los Gatos Planning Dept. 110 East Main Street Los Gatos, California 95030 Letter of justification - 115 North Santa Cruz Avenue/S-07-019 et al.. Dear Sandy: JAN 11 7 ?00; TOWN OF CGS GA--`(-) This letter describes our response to issues raised by architect Larry Cannon/ CDG, the Goals and Policies of the General Plan affecting approval of the application, and findings in support of the request for a reduced front setback. In addition and in response to concerns of the Historic Preservation Committee I have included a view analysis of the property as seen from North Santa Cruz Avenue. Response to CDG Review: In CDG's initial report of April 20, 2007 three primary issues were identified: 1. To what degree will the (project) compromise the historic setting and. quality of the existing structure? 2. Will the added structures improve or detract from the urban design quality of the downtown? 3. Is the amount of the proposed new construction appropriate for the site? The report offered -4- options for consideration ranging from no project to modification of the north building. The application was revised to incorporate the recommendations included in Option 3 as follows: • Decrease the size of the north building: the floor area was reduced from 540sf to 424sf and reconfigured with a narrow elevation (16') facing NSCA. Increase the size of the south building either by extending north or adding floor area behind: we opted to add area behind the building rather than encroach on the view of the mansion. The south building floor area was increased by 59sf to a total of 1,176sf. CDG prepared a second report dated September 24, 2007. They stated that "The design is much improved " and that they have two lingering concerns. Those concerns and our response to each are as follows: ® Roof form at the south end of the south building: Cannon observed that the roof was "awkward" as designed. He recommended and we revised the roof to match the opposite end. The south building was shown previously with two gables facing NSCA. CDG recommended one be removed and the remaining gable be moved farther north; the design has been modified accordingly. ;.i ~ 11. ii . . 6 , C,_)i e fj"vC."tUE t OS T~<t't~7t;, ~„1 UTL"tL< ~;,iil ii 91 35 7 1 i 7. (~'{J~ ti ,j i 45 115 NSCti' / p. 2 10 January 2008 CDG recommended wood siding for the walls which would "relate them strongly to the window system and the wood of the existing (mansion) We had proposed plaster siding to match the existing low historic wall at the back of sidewalk. The plans are revised to show fancy-cut wood shingle siding and color to match the mansion. Goals and Policies of the General Plan The Land Use Element Section 2.4.2.b of the General Plan defines one aspect of the CBD - Central Business District as follows: ® Integrates new construction with existing structures of historical or architectural significance and emphasizes the importance of the pedestrian. This application intends to accomplish exactly that as evidenced by its conformance with these goals and policies of the Land Use Element: I L.G.1.1: To preserve, promote and protect the existing small town character and quality of life within Los Gatos. L.P.1.1: Development shall be of high quality contruction, a positive addition to and compatible with the Town's ambiance. Development shall enhance the character and unique identity of existing commercial and/or residential neighborhoods. L.P.13: Encourage economic and social activity consistent with a small-scale, small town atmosphere and image. L.P.1.4: Preserve and promote existing commercial centers consistent with the maintenanace of a small-scale, small town atmosphere and image. L.P.1.8: In-fill projects shall be designed in context with the neighborhood and surrounding zoning with respect to the existing scale and character of the surrounding structures and should blend rather than compete with the established character of the area. L.P.1.9: Preserve and protect historic structures including those that have -been designated or are contributors in existing historic districts. Use special care in reviewing new buildings or remodels in the vicinity to address compatibility issues and potential impacts. L.G.6.1: To maintain the historic character of the downtown. L.G.6.2: To preserve downtown Los Gatos as the historic center of the Town with goods and services for local residents while maintaining the existing Town identity, environment and commercial viability. L.P.6.1: Encourage the preservation, restoration, rehabilitation, reuse and maintenance of existing buildings. 115 NSCA/p. 3 10 January 2008 L.P.6.4: Establish and maintain strong boundaries between the CBD and adjacent residential structures. L.P.6.5: Recognize and encourage the different functions, land use patterns, and use mixes of the various commercial areas within the downtown. This includes: The pedestrian scale, specialty orientation of the CBD. The Community Design Element of the General Plan contains additional goals and policies supportive of this application: CD.G.1.1: To preserve and enhance the Town's character through exceptional community design. CD.P.1.2: Promote, enhance and protect the functionality and appearance of the Towns commercial areas. CD.P.3.2: Encourage adaptive reuse of residential, cout7ie. iai von public ucliid'u"2gS. CD.P.3.6: Renovations or remodels of historic structures shall be architecturally consistent and compatible with the original structure. CD.P.3.7: New structures within historic areas shall be designed to blend and harmonize with the neighborhood. CD.P.4.1: Provide for a pedestrian oriented downtown core. CD.P.4.2: Establish and maintain strong boundaries between the commercial area and adjacent residential neighborhoods. CD.P.4.3: Preserve and enhance the appearance of the Central Business District (CBD) through design improvements. Findings in support of a Reduced Front Setback Article VI of the zoning ordinance stipulates that front setbacks in the C-2 zone shall be 10' except: "The deciding body may allow a reduction in setback if it makes all of the following findings: a. The setback provides for adequate pedestrian circulation; b. The setback is compatible with the adjacent buildings and compliments the buildings in the immediate vicinity; and c. The setback provides adequate clear sight vision for vehicular traffic," We believe the application meets all of the required findings. View Analysis as seen from North Santa Cruz Avenue It is our contention that the new buildings will reinforce the fabric of the existing streetscape and at the same time gradually reveal the mansion as a found space, inviting pedestrians to enter and discover the very intimate and charming 115 NSCA/p. 4 10 January 2008 courtyard created by the whole assemblage. The attached drawing and following comments illustrate this point. The letter bullets refer to the drawing keynotes: C. Building alignments as requested and as represented in the orthogonal elevation drawings shown on Sheet 2 of the application. A. The range of view standing opposite the main entrance extends well beyond the limits of the historic mansion. B. The range of view of a passerby reveals the full extent of the courtyard from the new dining deck to the north property line and neighboring Bank of the West. F. The new dining deck is equal to the mansion's existing floor level, both obviating the need for the extensive and universally disliked ADA ramps and precluding any possibility of a view thru the new south building. Additionally, it is worth pointing out that a transparent rear wall would reveal only the below-floor-level wall of the modern, former mortuary building (also universally disliked) and none of the mansion. We are certain that this proposal is well considered, appropriate to the goals for a vital downtown shopping district and especially sensitive to the importance of the Coggeshall Mansion. We have welcomed staff's and committee comments and especially those of Larry Cannon and believe the project has benefitted from them. We look forward to your favorable review. lncTrely, w Jolyn Lien Santa Cruz Wilder, LLC ~ ~w f ~ z zm ,t u C]¢ ° o < g 1 A lY - . r` I~N l ~ -Cmr yr wesa C f i i I i "x I L% a i JL W z e N e H 2 e x F Z4 O z c G 4 F C G Z w _ V t ~ F ~pG azt "o< ? ~ L >o~ L ~ N F C ~SCQ 4 > C C C) o F a Q y ~ a x i 8 ~ ~ ti C kg- ~j C~ .0 Scl } n U a .5 U Qu M i Y U Z L ^ t a T L t i = - L ••3L W~ L m Hd _ O . 7 C d - t tT W T d N l0 N- L - H - OCUmu La E -u L u Y u t0 V Y Y u O G C G G O - L' 'd 7 W 01 L L ' - O n L - p m - D. fO d L W L O C Y m N Ol d Itl N M C tS 'O M C O W L u L L p~.~ [T E s d 'O m iT ^L9 u d - u u a m c - A H o L 3 a > m N m- W L L C- - H u p- - L Q C L d O O.. H T d -'p Y Y O ~ ~ 0- tT - y.. C - C T2 m L. H N Y •-1 O C to T 7 O Y W Y 10 d C L Y O d Y W - G y W E H. Y L V W L > 3- d O C 7 d o. d t O u L 3 h 9 - c❑ U - Q Y m c> H N ~ L d O•-- ' d H~ L d.Y tp- Y- 4. W H O T N L L p~ u ' ' O L m d H t 0> L a N O y _ 4 - N ~ L W O v Q L v L C 7 L . a M E N H Y T - d d d N L Y d N 7.- W d - a d vt M u VI • - d L d L L Ip C Ifl d Ol L ' ~ ~ 7 3 H L H D - d N O O T Ol O H ~ O O H H Ip 4 d e0 > d Y H L/ C u y d H YI Q~ L W N T- L L w d L C L 4- N C 7 4- C H L - u 'p O O L u d H p W O N Y Ip H H C C h d k. 2 Y h U L h C L h Y W O Y . + 1" L C u OI d ~ 'O d L Q H d L- W 2 10 d V{ N 3 L O - d 4 u d 4-. u L H o c u E H._ p.- W c + - HA d W T O H u c v v « vl a r d Y x L m rn In vl d F - W ~p G d vl u W . L d d a. o v w. Y vl U i 1 H H a H H C C L > Ip - U C H U V- C W VI U 'O w. C W C u O > C L V C W i C 0 O N W O L L H d Y O 1 L iT - C E 10- Ot S N 'O N C C1 O L- t0 V- ` O 2 -t C J+`L N C . u d C ^ OI N S ~n y C T L ~n d O 4" ~ O C Y u C~ C ~ 10 C E N C L = O O O u w- m u N O n A 3 - d O d 0 2 L H V O d L d Y d u Z H r. L 4- O m U 'O u u L- 4- u H C C L L m u o c d - m u h as o o ~ d O c v n u> H ^ u m E d u E d u A Y o a H` L c c m •_om L L ~ ' H - u W E A v~ vl u- u Y u N ~ H Y L^ u d O n w i L 4- N Y 10 v 4% ~ d ~n Ql W 3 a. d N L U pl C U ~/1 O (O C C u T O. d W OI Ol C v- w v~ U u L 3 O u U N U '9 H u 2 2 O O w. U> L - W - L u - C w W O L u ~y O ra m C C H A C)- O U H C Y L U O I G U L c + ~ ip L O L u C O 'O . o m o u v- E vH ~v o•, c C U W L a - a ~ o o ^ A v mw- a d v~ ~ c.- r L L L - - a ~ ~ t v o- r> a o u u O N o- ' A H c o a, h u g - u 6 O vi to U ~n L v~ O U 3 L u O - u 4~ U N w O~ C N d u L u E u x V D U L v~ p Q O u- L `O L S L u u t L V- u u O o rv c EXHIBIT 11 ARCHITECTURE PLANNING. URBAN DESIGN April 20, 2007 R E r -1 ED Ms. Sandy Baily CLAY - 3 2007 Community Development Department Town of Los Gatos TOWN OF LOS G ATOS 110 E. Main Street PLANNING DIVISION P.O. Box 949 Los Gatos, CA 95031 RE: Chart House Dear Sandy: I .reviewed the revised drawings, and read the Historic Preservation Committee's letter to the architect and the architect's response to staff. My comments and recommendations are as follows: Neighborhood Context and Issues The existing building is set well back from the front property line, creating a garden setting for the historic structure. The. northern portion of the Coggeshall Mansion, constructed in 1891, is clearly the older, original portion of the structure, and the most important as a contributor to the Santa Cruz Avenue,streetscape. TEL: 415.331.3795 FAY,: 415.331.3797 '-MAIL: cdbr' MlIBIT 12 180 HARBOR DRIVE. SUITE 219 . SAUSALITO. CA 94965 View south along sidewalk View to entry and original portion of the house Currently Proposed Site Plan Chart House Design Review Comrients April 20, 2007 Page 2 The primary issues seem to he as follows: 1. To what degree will the infill of a significant portion of the garden in front of the Mansion compromise the his- toric setting and quality of the existing structure? 2. Will the added structures improve or detract from the urban design quality of Downtown Los Gatos? 3. Is the amount of proposed new construction in the front garden area appropriate for the site? All of these are value judgements. I am unable to make a firm recommendation, but can pose a range of options that may assist staff, the Historic Preservation Committee and the Planning Commission in selecting the most comfortable solution for the context of Downtown. Options The following four options are arranged from the least to the most impact on the current site conditions. Option 1. No Project The trees and landscaping add variety to the otherwise continuous commercial storefronts and create a minipark within the downtown. Downtown Pleasanton has a similar condition of a restaurant in a historic structure set back from the street with a landscaped garden area between the structure and the sidewalk. The front setback is used for outdoor din- ing which has added its own liveliness to the streetscape. CANNON DESIGN GROUP 180 L [ARBOR DRIVE. SUITE 219 . SAUSALITO . CA 94965 Downtown Pleasanton similar example Design Re-,rie\v Comments April 20, 2007 Page 3 Option 2. Limit the Addition to One Structure Eliminate the smaller structure to the north. The extent of new construction seems substantially more than I looked at during my earlier studies last October. This approach would partially retain the current garden feeling, and would maintain good visual exposure for the original historic portion of the house. Some improvements to the front garden to make it more accessible and usable should be considered. This option would allow additional retail at the street front while minimizing negative impacts on the portion of the existing structure that contributes most to the visual quality of the streetscape. OPTION 2 CANNON DESICN CROUP IM HARBOR DRIVE . SUITE 219. SAU5ALI FO CA 94965 Remove second building and enhance garden Chart House Dcsign Revie\v Comments April 20, 2007 Page 4 Option 3. Reduce the Size of the Structure to the North Reducing the northern structure and treating it more as a retail kiosk would reduce its impact on the existing structure and maintain a sense of the garden setting. Some increase in the size of the southern structure might be considered to compensate for some of this floor area reduction. OPTION 3 SITE PLAN CANNON DESIGN GROUP 180 I-IARBOR DRIVE SUITE 219. SAUSALITO. CA 94965 Increase size of Decrease size of smaller larger structure structure and treat as kiosk Increase in depth to the Reduce mass and'treat as object west better than increase in the garden rather than a building in length to the north Design Reviexv Comments April 20, 2007 Page 5. Eliminate roof top element Stucco wail is inconsistent with the. architectural style and,the element conflicts with the.Queen,Anne :turret Roof at property line seems very awkward Better to use same slope at other roof planes Increase size of larger structure Better if additional area is at back of structure OPTION 3 ALTERNATIVE ELEVATION Kiosk ----------------.-1 1 1 i 1 1 .1 1 / i 1 1 1. 1 1- 1. I i l ; Reduced scale Decrease size of smaller structure and treat as kiosk Reduce mass and treat as object in the garden rather than a building CANNON DESIGN G20UP 80 ~!ARP,OR DRIV[ . SUITr L' J . SAU5/%L1T0. CF, 94965 e CURRENTLY PROPOSED ELEVATION Chart House Desi&m Review Commcnes April 20, 2007 11a1;c G Option 4. Modify the Design of the Smaller Structure The two rather different forms of the two structures seems uncomfortable to me. I believe that redesigning the norther- ly structure to reflect the curved form of the southerly building would be better. It would create a more classic symmetry and, by eliminating the south facing gable, would reduce the obstruction to views of the Queen Anne turret. OPTION 4 CANNON D7SIGN GROUP 1 U0 HARBOR DRIVC. SUITE 219. SAUSALI T O . CA 941,165 Treat smatter building with rounded end to create more of a classical symmetrical entry Design Review Comments April 20, 2007 Page 7 Eliminate roof top element Stucco wall is inconsistent with the architectural style.and the element conflicts with the Queen Anne turret With regard to the design of the structures themselves, I would definitely recommend eliminating the roof top element. The use of stucco on the roof is inconsistent with the architectural style, and the roof elements seem to compete with the Queen Anne turret of the existing structure without adding anything substantial to the project. And, I am conflicted about the use of stucco on the walls of the buildings. It would seem that metal, metal and glass, or metal and opaque glass would be better than using stucco since the structures are treated similar to conservatories which would typically limit stucco, brick, or stone to wainscot bases. The proposed project is unique and does not easily fit within the framework of the adopted Commercial Design Guidelines. Because of the uniqueness of the historic building and its substantial setback from the street, the site and any development intensification should be judged on the extent to which the proposal would relate to, and reinforce, the character and quality of the Coggeshall -Mansion, and the extent to which is would retain the existing park-like setting along the street. Sandy, lease let me know if you have any questions, or if there are specific issues of concern that I did not address. Sincerely, CANNON DESIGN GROUP Larry Cannon AICP President C/1,NNON JESi(-,N GROUT IW) NP,RBOR DRIVE . SUrrr_ 2l9 . SAUS/ ? i o CA 94965 CURRENTLY PROPOSED ELEVATION OPTION 4 ALTERNATIVE ELEVATION ARCHITECTURE PLANNING URBAN DESIGN GZ-6, I I ~Hl CANNON ' 4 DESIGN~ R ,_UP.oA RECEIVED September 24, 2007, 2007 SEP 2 -5 2007 Ms. Sandy Baily Community Development Department R WN OF LOS GATOS Town of Los Gatos PLANNING DIVISION 110 E. Main Street P.O. Box 949 Los Gatos, CA 95031 RE: 115 North Santa Crus Avenue Retail Addions Dear Sandy: I reviewed the revised drawings. The design is much improved since I first reviewed it. There are, however, two lingering concerns as follows: 1. The roof form is very awkward at the south property line with the odd angle to the end - partly a result of trying to achieve the maximum building square footage at an angled property line. In some cases that might be acceptable, but I do believe that the historic quality of the existing structure on this site deserves a more classic and complete design solo= tion. It would be better to relate the roof form more directly to the north end of this structure. Some, adjustment would be needed for the location and/or form of building element on the west side of the structure. This roof condition and n gable entry close to end of the building is awkward tom,' FRONT ELEVA Symmetrical roof form and TEL: 415, FAX: 415.331.3797 EMAIL: cdBpIan@pa. 180 HARBOR DRIVE . SUITE 219 SAUSALITO - CA 94965 EXHIBIT 13 Wood frame and panel walls would relate better to the existing building than stucco walls Stone or stucco base OK RECOM10ENDED FRONT ELEVATION 115 NL~ Santa Cruz Avenue Retail Additions Design Review Comments September 24, 2007 Page 2 2. Related to the above comment, the placement of the entry gable so close to the south end of the building seems awkward and out of character with this type of structure. Moving the entry to the north, as shown in the Recommenda- tions diagram, would be desirable. 3. I am still very concerned about the use of stucco for the wall materials. Strong consideration should be given to the use of a wood frame and panel system for the walls, relating them strongly to the window system and the wood of the existing building on the site. Relating to the historic quality building seems more appropriate to me than relating to the adjacent stucco huildings. Sandy, please let me know if you have any questions or need any other issues addressed. Sincerely, CANNON DESIGN GROUP Larry Cannon AICP President CANNON DESIGN GROUP 180 HARBOR DRIVE . SUITE 219 . SAUSALITO . CA 94965 ARBOR RESOURCES Professional Arboricultural Consulting & Tree Care A TREE INVENTORY AND REVIEW OF THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AT 115 N. SANTA CRUZ AVENUE LOS GATOS, CALIFORNIA PROPERTY OWNER: Santa Cruz Wilder, LLC APPLICANT: John Lien APN: 510-17-065 and 071 Submitted to: Sandy L. Baily, AICP Community Development Department Town of Los Gatos . 110 East Main Street Los Gatos, CA 95031 Prepared by: David L. Babby, RCA ASCA Registered Consulting Arborist #399 ISA Certified Arborist WE-4001A September 21, 2007 RECEIVE.,) SEP 2 1 2007 TOWN OF, LOS GATOS PLANNING DIVISIQN P.O. Box 25295, San Mateo, California 94402 o Email: arborresources@comcast.net Phone: 650.654.3351 Fax: 650.240.0777 Licensed Contractor #796763 EXHIBIT 14 David L. Babby, Registered Consulting Arborist September 21, 2007 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION TITLE PAGE 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1 2.0 TREE COUNT AND COMPOSITION ..................................1 3.0 REVIEW OF PROJECT IMPACTS AND TREES 2 4.0 RECOMMENDATIONS 3 4.1 Design Guidelines 3 4.2 Protection Measures Before and During Construction 5 EXHIBITS EXHIBIT TITLE A TREE INVENTORY TABLE B SITE MAP 1 David L. Babby, Registered Consulting Arborist September 21, 2007 1.0 INTRODUCTION I have been retained by the Town of Los Gatos Community Development Department to review the potential tree impacts associated with the proposed construction of two retail buildings and associated grading along the frontage of 115 N. Santa Cruz Avenue, Los Gatos. This report presents my analysis and recommendations. Trees inventoried for this report are defined as "Protected"' and situated within the front section of the property along N. Santa Cruz Avenue. Documents reviewed for this report include the following: [1] Sheets 1, lA and 4 (all dated 8/22/07) by John Lien Architect, and [2] a report by Barrie D. Coate and Associates, dated 7/24/07. The trees' locations and assigned numbers are presented on a copy of Sheet 1 (Site Plan) in Exhibit B. Note that I assume the locations of trees shown on the plans reviewed have been surveyed and are accurate; if this is not the case, the locations of the large trees should be surveyed and presented on future plans. 2.0 TREE COUNT AND COMPOSITION There are 10 trees of five various species inventoried for. this report; they include four pittosporum (#1 and 8-10), two holly oaks (#2 and 3), one coast live oak (44), one date palm (45), and two coast redwoods (46 and 7). Specific data recorded for each tree is presented within the Tree Inventory Table in Exhibit A. 1 Section 29.10.0960 of the Town Code defines a "Protected Tree" on private property as being regulated and having a trunk diameter of four inches and greater measured at three feet above grade. Fruit- or nut-bearing trees with trunks less than 18 inches in diameter are exempt (Section 29.10.0970). 115 N. Santa Cruz Avenue, Los Gatos Page 1 of 7 Town of Los Gatos Community Development Department David L. Babby, Registered Consulting Arborist September 21, 2007 Three of the inventoried trees, #2 thru 4, are located within the public right-of-way between the curb and sidewalk (i.e. "street trees"). The plans identify four street trees; however, the southernmost one does not exist and should be omitted from the plans. There are five additional river birch (Betulus nigra) situated in a row along the northern property boundary immediately north of the restaurant. They are all of Ordinance-size, range in fair to good condition, and have trunk diameters ranging from 4 to 12 inches. The plans identify an additional redwood at the rear of the building. It is a very large redwood that appears in overall fair health and has a trunk diameter of 39.5 inches and a canopy spread of 40 feet. In the event the parking lot and rear alleyway along the west side of the property were to be used for access and staging during construction, the following additional trees would be at risk: three small redwoods, two large redwoods, one coast live oak on a neighboring site, and one laurel. 3.0 REVIEW OF PROJECT IMPACTS AND TREES Seven trees are indicated on the plans to be removed for development purposes; they include #1, 3, 5, 6 and 8-10. Based on their current condition and/or species, their loss seemingly conforms to Section 29.10.0990 of the Town Code. For reasons specified below, replacement trees would be necessary to mitigate the loss of trees #3 and 5. Trees #1 and 8-10 are pittosporum in a state of poor and declining condition, a situation that is expected to lead to their demise in the near future. As such, these trees can be regarded as hazardous and mitigation would not be necessary. ■ Tree #3 is a holly oak located along the street and appears in only fair overall condition due to a sparse canopy and significant damage to its lower trunk. ■ Tree #5 is a Canary Island date palm in overall good condition but requires high maintenance to avoid its frond and fruit falling onto people below. 115 N. Santa Cruz Avenue, Los Gatos Page 2 of 7 Town of Los Gatos Community Development Department David L. Babby, Registered Consetlting Arborist September 21, 2007 ■ Tree #6 is a redwood that has an abnormal indentation at the base of the east side of its trunk. Further exploration to determine the cause of the formation resulted in removing river rock surrounding the trunk. In doing so, it exposed a three-inch girdling root and the absence of a buttress root at the trunk's east side, both situations predisposing the tree to fall over and/or prematurely decline and die. As such, it is my opinion that the tree can be regarded as hazardous and should be removed regardless of the proposed development. Mr. Coate also recommends the tree's removal irrespective of planned construction. 4.0 RECOMMENDATIONS The recommendations presented within this section are based on plans reviewed and serve as guidelines to mitigate tree-related impacts. Please note that they are subject to revision upon reviewing any additional or revised plans. 4.1 Design Guidelines 1. The plans should reflect the accurate trunk locations, trunk diameters, and canopy dimensions of each tree. I also suggest the ground elevations of two sides of tree #Ts trunk is surveyed and shown on Sheet 4. 2. The section of new brick, including base material, being installed beneath tree #7's canopy must be fully pervious 3. The section of walkway and curb within 12 feet from tree Vs trunk must require no more than a six-inch vertical cut, including for base materials, edging and forms. Preferably, these features should be established entirely on top of existing soil grade with no soil cuts. 115 N. Santa Cruz Avenue, Los Gatos Page 3 of 7 Town of Los Gatos Community Development Department David L. Babby, Registered Consulting Arborist September 21, 2007 4. The subgrade within 10 feet from tree 47's trunk must not be directly compacted. Additionally, compaction of subbase materials must not exceed 85-percent density.I also recommend that 5. Any new underground utilities and services should be established outside from beneath the trees' canopies. I should be consulted in the event this is not feasible. 6. Approved excavation for the building footings must not require more than a 12- (preferred) to 18-inch overcut where beneath tree #7's canopy. 7. The permanent and temporary drainage design, including downspouts, should not require water being discharged beneath the canopies. 8. Per Section 29.10.1000(C.1) of the Ordinance, a copy of this report (or a revised version) must be incorporated into the final set of project plans, titled Sheet(s) T-l, T- 2, etc. (Tree Protection Instructions), and referenced on all site-related plans (e.g. Sheets 1 and 4, as well as any landscape plans). 9. Section 29.10.095 of the Ordinance should be used as the framework for mitigating the removal of trees. For replacement trees, their amount, species and size shall be determined by the Parks and Public Works Department, and planted prior to final inspection. They must be double-staked with rubber tree ties and all forms of irrigation shall be of an automatic drip or soaker hose system placed on the soil surface and not in a sleeve. 10. The proposed landscape design should conform to the following guidelines: a. New plants should only be installed at least three feet from the base of the redwood trunks. b. Irrigation for new plant material should be of a drip-type system and not applied within one-foot from the trees' trunks. c. Trenching for irrigation or lighting should be avoided beneath the canopies. If necessary, they should be routed in a radial direction to the trunks. 115 M Santa Cruz Avenue, Los Gatos Page 4 of 7 Town of Los Gatos Community Development Department David L. Babby, Registered ConsultingArborist September 21, 2007 d. Stones, mulch and fencing should not be placed against the trunks of existing or new trees. Plastic ground cover should also be avoided beneath canopies. e. Tilling beneath canopies should be avoided, including for weed control. f. Bender board or other edging material proposed beneath the canopies should be established on top of existing soil grade (such as by using vertical stakes). 4.2 Protection Measures before and during Consuction 11. Due to the close proximity of activities among trees, an ISA (International Society of Arboriculture) certified arborist and/or a member of ASCA (American Society of Consulting Arborists) - to be named the "project arborist" - should be retained by the applicant or owner to assist in implementing and achieving compliance with all tree protection measures. 12. Prior to any demolition or site clearing work, a pre-construction meeting should be held on-site with the project arborist and contractor to discuss work procedures, protection fencing locations and types, limits of grading, staging areas, routes of . access, supplemental watering, mulching, locations for equipment washing pits, and any other applicable tree protection measures. The limits of grading should be staked prior to the meeting. 13. Tree protective fencing shall be installed prior to any demolition, construction, trenching or surface scraping, and its precise location must be determined and its placement approved by the project arborist. The material used shall be in accordance with Section 29.10.1005 of the Ordinance and approved by the project arborist. 14. Unless otherwise approved, all development activities must be conducted outside the designated protected areas and off unpaved areas beneath the canopies of Ordinance- size trees inventoried and not inventoried for this report. These activities include, but are not limited to, the following: demolition, grading, stripping of topsoil, trenching, equipment cleaning, stockpiling/dumping of materials, and equipment/vehicle operation and parking. 115 N. Santa Cruz Avenue, Los Gatos Page 5 of 7 Town of Los Gatos Community Development Department David L. Babby, Registered Convulting Arborist September 21, 2007 15. Prior to commencing work, I recommend a six-inch layer of coarse wood chips (i/4- to 3/a- inch in size) is manually spread on unpaved soil beneath tree 47's canopy, excluding where within 12 inches from the building footprint (the wood chips should not be piled or placed against the trunk). The wood chips should remain throughout construction (and possibly beyond), and must not be placed against the trees' trunks. These wood chips can be obtained from tree service companies and/or by contacting www.reuserinc.com. Plywood can be placed on top of the wood chips (but not against the trunks) and tied together to create a sturdy walking surface. 16. Any approved activity required on unpaved areas beneath the trees' canopies must be performed under the knowledge and direction of the project arborist. All work should be manually performed using hand tools and wheelbarrows. In the event roots of two inches and greater are encountered during the process, the project arborist shall be consulted. 17. In the event any piers or post-holes are dug beneath the canopies, their locations should be first reviewed with the project arborist. The first 2.5 to 3 feet below existing grade should be dug using a post-hole digger. If roots >2 inches in diameter are encountered during this process, the hole should be resituated to either side. If no root is found, the remaining section of hole can be mechanically drilled using a manually-operated auger. 18. All existing, unused lines or pipes beneath the canopies of retained trees (and beyond the proposed home) should be abandoned and cut off just below existing soil grade. 19. Each recommendation presented within Section 4.1 of this report and applicable to the actual development of the site shall be followed. 20. Throughout development, supplemental water should be supplied to the retained trees; the project arborist shall determine the specific trees, intervals, amounts and application methods. 115 N. Santa Cruz Avenue, Los Gatos Page 6 of 7 Town ofLos Gatos Community Development Department David L. Babby, Registered Consulting Arborist September 21, 2007 21. All river rocks piled against and near tree #7's trunk should be immediately pulled away by hand. 22. The pruning of trees shall be performed prior to construction, in accordance with ANSI A300-2001 standards, and by a California state-licensed tree service company that has an ISA (International Society of Arboriculture) Certified Arborist in a supervisory role. 23. All equipment shall be positioned to avoid the trunks and branches of trees. Where a conflict arises, the project arborist must be contacted to help address the situation. 24. The disposal of harmful products (such as chemicals, oil and gasoline) is prohibited beneath canopies or anywhere on site that allows drainage beneath canopies. Herbicides should not be used beneath the trees' canopies; where used on site, they should be labeled for safe use near trees. Prepared By Date: September 21, 2007 David L. Babb4RC y r t censyr~,} Y 115 N. Santa Cruz Avenue, Los Gatos Page 7 of 7 Town of Los Gatos Community Development Department David L. Babby, Registered Consulting Arborist September 21, 2007 EXHIBIT A: TREE ENVENTORY TABLE 115 N. Santa Cruz Avenue, Los Gatos Town of Los Gatos Community Development Department TREE INVENTORY TABLE q0 0 (D d u a~ o q II 0 0 II o o^ p q O z 1 s M ~ a, q N cd CD ' C:' . ° i q I . y 0 c yy 11 n ~y 0 - N ~:l O i--. O. U , H \ 4 . TREE 42 b-° 11 C ° o t ° an W_ 0 ° NO TREE NAME w ° 43 o p E3 ° Z ° . a . F Pittosporum 1 (Pittosporum eugenioides) 9 25 25% 50% Poor Low - X Comments: At least 50-percent of canopy is dead. Tree appears beyond recovery and continued decline is expected. Holly Oak 2 (Quercus ilex) 16 35 75% 50% Fair Moderate 2 - X Comments: Significant damage to overhead limbs.due to vehicles. Holly 3 Oak - 3 (Quercus ilex) 25 35 50% 75% Fair Moderate - FX X Comments: Significant damage to lower trunk. Canopy is sparse. Coast Live Oak T 4 (Quercus agrifolia) 1 6 75% 75% Good Low 2 - X Comments: Tree is newly planted and has a low-growing structure that significantly encroaches. If pruned to alleviate this conflict, most of the cano y would be removed. Tree is not suitable and should be removed. Canary Island Date Palm 5 (Phoenix canariensis) -22 25 100% 100% Good Moderate X Comments: Tree has approximately 35 feet of brown trunk feet. Trunk diameter is an estimate due to limited access. Coast Redwood 6 (Sequoia sempervirens) 15.5 20 100% 25% Poor Low - X Comments: Rocks are piled against lower trunk. There is an indentation on the trunk's bottom east side, a defect symptomatic of a girdling root. The root area should be examined for safety reasons. Coast Redwood 7 (Sequoia sempervirens) 21.5 25 100% 100% Good High 1 - Comments: Rocks are also piled against trunk. Pittosporum 8 (Pittosporum eugenioides) 14 20 25% 50% Poor Low X Comments: Tree is dying as most of the live foliage is absent. Pittosporum F9 (Pittosporum eugenioides) 6.5 15 25% 50% Poor Low - X Comments: Canopy is significantly sparse. Pittosporum 10 FPittosporum eugenioides) 10 30 50% 54% Fair Low X Comments: Tree contains large deadwood. Site: 995 N. Santa Cruz Avenue, Los Gatos Prepared for: Town of Los Gatos Comm. Develop, Depart. Prepared by: David L. Gabby, RCA September 21, 2007 David L. Babby, Registered Consulting Arborist September 21, 2007 EXHIBIT B: SITE MAP 115 N. Santa Cruz Avenue, Los Gatos Town of Los Gatos Community Development Department CO 0 4 0 U) 0 J W Z W N D U Q Z Cl) Z LO T" M .1 W Z Z: v. a~~ w yW e+ rZ~ 'tINM u lf~r7~ EARRI E D. GATE and ASSOCIATES Horticutural Consultants 23535 Summit Road Los Gatos, CA 95033 408/353-1052 A RECOMMENDATION FOR TREE REMOVAL AT THE TREVESE RESTAURANT LOS GAT®S Prepared at the Request of: Mr. John Lien, Architect 196 College Avenue Los Gatos, CA 9503 Site Visit by:. Barrie D. Coate Consulting Arborist July 24, 2007 Job #07-07-120. ii '4 I C U ' 1 ~O r: rOVV lv orCG~ EXHIBIT 15 A RECOMMENDATION FOR TREE REMOVAL AT THE TREVESE RESTAURANT, LOS GATOS Assigurnent On Tuesday, July 24, 07, I met Mr. Lien at the Trevese Restaurant, at 115 N. Santa Cruz Avenue, Los Gatos, to inspect a coast redwood (Sequoia servtpervirens 'Soquel') that is one of a pair in the front garden of this restaurant. The goal was to determine whether the tree was structurally sound or presents a potential for failure. The question was raised because the site in which this tree stands is needed for construction of a small building. Observations The tree in question is a coast redwood (Sequoia sempervirens 'Soquel') of 16-inch DBH (diameter at 4.5 feet above grade) a height of approximately 50 feet and a branch spread of approximately 15 feet. The tree is in excellent health but unfortunately has been adversely affected by 4 to 8 inch river rocks piled directly against its base when the tree was planted and subsequently has grown around the rocks as it matured. In addition, the tree has a girdling root of 3-inch diameter at approximately 8 inches below soil grade. Although there are four buttress roots growing on the north and west sides of this trunk above this girdling root there are no large buttress roots on the east side opposite the existing buttress roots and as a result there is no structural support for the tree on its east side. Further, landscapers have piled 6 to 8 inch river rocks tightly against the trunk and as a result the tree has grown around these rocks causing severe deformity in the root buttress area further damaging the root buttress structure that is the essential support of the tree. This tree is extremely healthy due to its vigorous supply of vascular tissue on the north west side but considering the total lack. of structural support on the east side I would consider this tree as potentially structurally unsound. Conclusion Based on this very unfortunate set of circumstances I recommend removal of this tree irrespective of planned construction. Respectfully submitted, Barrie D. Coate BDC/s1 Enclosures: Assumptions and Limiting Conditions Pictures PREPARED BY: BARRIE D. COATE, CONSULTING ARBORIST JULY 24, 2007 BARRI E D. COA,TE and ASSOCIATES Horticutural Consultants 23535 Summit Road Los Gatos. CA 95033 408!353-1052 =-i Definifloms of Terms Tree Canopy - (Tree Crown.) - Consists of all portions of the tree bearing foliage. Commonly applied to activity beneath the canopy, also defined as the area inside the drip-lire. Drip-line - The line described on the ground directly below the outer edge of the tree canopy. The area between the drip line and the tree trunk contains the majority of the absorbing root tips. Many more are found beyond this line. Root Kass - The portion of the tree which supplies water and minerals to the foliage crown (absorbing roots) and which provides structural support for the crown (secondary roasts). Root Protection Zone Nominally, the area beneath the canopy plus 50% the radius of the canopy on any given side of the tree (a 40 foot diameter canopy with a 20 foot radius has a.30 foot wide root protection zone on any side of the tree). Branch Attachment - The joint at.which limbs or branches join the trunk or limb from which they originate. Co-dominant )!,ceder - A marrow branch attachment most commonly seen where an upright branch is competing with the. natural leader or inhere two or more vertical truraks are joined. When they are of similar or equal diameter, a danger of one of therm breaking out is created. Inclined. Bark - A condition created when., co-dominant leaders each produce bark in the narrow crotch, compounding the problem of poor attachment, and often leading to break=age. Absorbing Root 'l'ips - The roots produced in the upper 2 to 3 feet of soil which absorb water and minerals. The most effective ones are found in 'the top 2-inches if a mulch is maintained on the soil surface. Mulch - Any material which insulates the soil surface. Organic mulches are preferred since they, decompose to increase the hurzzic acid content of the soil, but rock mulches are better than no mulch, and allows leaves to be blown off their surface- Stub-cutting - Removal of a limb. or branch end at a point where no branches emerge. This is a destructive procedure. Drop-crotch Pruning - Removal of the end of a branch back to a side branch of at least 50% the diameter of the portion removed (a 4-inch diameter branch cut back to a 2-inch or larger diameter side branch). Lion's Tail Pruning - Excessive thinning of the interior branches and twigs, leaving foliage only at the ends of long, often poorly tapered limbs. This procedure is destructible. ; f RRI E D. COATS N ~ h I and ASSOCIATES fy. Y I HorGcuturaiconsultants 23535 Summit Road r Z, £ f~s2 : Los Gatos, CA 35033 408!353.1052 1. Any legal description provided to the appraiser/consultant is assumed to be correct. No responsibility is assumed for matters legal in character nor is any opinion rendered as to the quality of any title. 2. The appraiser/consultant can neither guarantee nor be responsible for accuracy of information provided by others. 3. The appraiser/consultant shall not be required to give testimony or to attend court by reason of this appraisal unless subsequent written arrangements are made, including payment of an additional fee for services. 4. Loss or removal of any part of this report invalidates the entire appraisal/evaluation. 5. Possession of this report or a copy thereof does not imply right of publication or use for any purpose by any other than the person(s) to whom it is addressed without written consent of this appraiserlconsultant. 6. This report and the values expressed herein represent the opinion of the appraiser/consultant, and the appraiser's/consultant's fee is in no way contingent upon the reporting of a specified value nor upon any finding to be reported. 7. Sketches, diagrams, graphs, photos, etc., in this report, being intended as visual aids, are not necessarily to scale and should not be construed as engineering reports or surveys. 8. This.report has been made in conformity with acceptable appraisal/evaluation/diagnostic reporting techniques and procedures, as recommended by the International Society of Arboriculture. 9. When applying any pesticide, fungicide, or herbicide, always follow label instructions. 10. No tree described in this report. was climbed, unless otherwise stated. We cannot take responsibility for any defects which could only have been discovered by climbing. A full roo collar inspection, consisting of excavating the soil around the tree to uncover the root collar and major buttress roots, was not performed, unless otherwise stated. We cannot take responsibility for any root defects which could only have been discovered by such an inspection. Arborists are tree specialists who use their education, kno'wledge, training, and experience to examine trees, recommend measures to enhance the beauty and health of trees, and attempt to reduce risk of living near trees. Clients may choose to accept or disregard the recommendations of the arborist, or to seek additional advice. Arborists cannot detect every condition that could possibly lead to the structural failure of a tree. Trees are living organisms that fail in ways we do not fully understand. Conditions are often hidden within trees and below ground. Arborists cannot guarantee that a tree will be healthy or safe under all circumstances, or for a specified period of time. Likewise, remedial treatments, like medicine, cannot be guaranteed. Trees can be managed, but they cannot be controlled. To live near trees is to accept some degree of risk. The only way to eliminate all risk associated with trees is to eliminate all trees. Barrie D. Coate iSA Certified Arborfst Horticultural Consultant A Recommendation For Tree Removal At The Trevese Restaurant Los Gatos Prepared By: Barrie D. Coate, Consulting P.rborist Photo I - The tree in question. I Photo 2 - River rocks were piled around it when it was installed. July 24, 2007 A Recommendation For Tree Removal Al The Trevese Restaurant Los Gatos ie. Z . ``A . . fi Photo 3 - A girdling root. Photo 4 - A deep indentation in the bless. FT 77711 -N k B~. M1y: 2 {Ir 1'f { { i A- AA r Prepared By: Barrie D. Coate, Consulting A- borist July 24, 2007 TOWN OF LOS GATOS 110 East Main Street, Los Gatos, CA 95032 (408)..3:54-6872 SUMMARY OF DISCUSSION OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE CONCEPTUAL DEVELOPMENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE OF THE TOWN OF LOS GATOS FOR FEBRUARY 8, 2006 HELD IN THE TOWN COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CIVIC CENTER, 1t0 EAST MAIN STREET, LOS GATOS, CALIFORNIA. The meeting was called to order at 4:30 P.M. ATTENDANCE Members Present: Absences: Diane McNutt None Joe Pirzynski Lee Quintana Stephen M. Rice Joanne Talesfore Staff Present: Bud N. Lortz, Director of Community Development; Randy Tsuda, Assistant Community Development Director; Debra Figone, Town Manager; Danielle Surdin, Economic Development Manager and Sandy Baily, Associate Planner. Public Comments: Ray Davis provided comments on Item 2 encouraging applicant to continue to get additional comments on the project to proceed through the process. TI`EM 1: 115 N. Santa Cruz Avenue Conceptual Development Application CD-06-05 Requesting preliminary review, of plans to convert an existing fine dining restaurant into a smaller fine dining restaurant with retail on the first floor and two residential units on the second floor, add a retail space on the ground floor and a residential unit above (for a total of three units) and to convert the existing parking lot which fronts on Wilder Avenue to a residential lot, on properties zoned C-2:LHP and R-1D. 510-17-065 and 071 PROPERTY OWNER: LCHLN, Inc APPLICANT: Grant S edgwick Comments: 1. Residential use on Wilder Avenue has merit, if parking issues can be -worked out. 2. Proposed addition at front may detract from the historic building. 3. Access and parking for residences on the second floor is a concern. 4. Purchasing of parking credit is a concern. 5. Ensure an architect or designer skilled in historic preservation/construction is hired to work on project. 6. The proposed addition and the multiple uses creates an intensity issue. EXHIBIT 16 7. There is no compelling reason to allow additional floor urea. 8. Mixed use is appropriate; however, residential uses over the restaurant may be incompatible due to noise and odor issues.'Office or B&B might be a better solution. 9. Do not relocate house. Maintain the existing setback. 10. Too many uses proposed for this site. 11. A home on Wilder Avenue may impact the existing tree. 12. Historic character of structure is important to maintain. 13. Addition will further reduce visibility of the house, exacerbating the problem created by the adjacent bank property. 14. Site is underutilized and needs to be brought back to landmark status. 15. Proposal must be innovative, creative and excellent in design. 16. Parking resource on Wilder Avenue is a benefit to the Town. 17. Parking requirement should be met without purchasing parking credits. 18. A large dinner house can be a draw. ITEM 2: 16245 Burton Road Conceptual Development Application CD-06-06 Requesting preliminary review of plans to demolish a single family residence and to construct a new child development center for up to 200 children on a 37,898 square foot parcel zoned R-1:8. APN 424-06-115. PROPERTY OWNER: Barry Swenson Builder APPLICANT: Future Assets Child Development Comments: 1. There is a definite need for child care facilities in Town, but this is not the right site 2. Concerned about piecemeal development in the North 40. 3. Parking, traffic circulation and drop offs areas are concerns. 4. Noise and air pollution from highway could impact children. 5. Use is too intense. 6. Timing of project is premature under the North 40 Specific Plan as completed. 7. Based on General Plan, there'should not be development in North 40 until the infrastructure is available. 8. 'T'here is a possibility that Burton Rd will be the major arterial to future development in the North 40. This use would be impacted by conversion of Burton Rd to an arterial. ADJOURNMENT: Meeting adjourned at 5:35 p.m. The next regular meeting of the Conceptual Development Advisory Committee is Wednesday, March 8, 2006. Pr aced b C Bud N. Lortz, Director of Comi_-nunity Developiinent cc: Planning Commission Clair T,1:ADTV\CD,^ C\MIJVCTFS\2006\2-8-06.tr i n_wpd TOWN OF LOS GATOS 110 East Main Street, Los Gatos, CA 95030 (408) 354-6872 SUMMARY MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE GENERAL PLAN COMMITTEE OF THE TOWN OF LOS GATOS FEBRUARY 28, 2007 HELD IN THE TOWN COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CIVIC CENTER, 110 EAST MAIN STREET, LOS GATOS, CALIFORNIA. The meeting was called to order at 5:35 pm by Chair Jane Ogle. ATTENDANCE Members present: Joe Pirzynski, Barbara Spector, John Bourgeois, Tom O Donnell, Marcia Jensen, Jane Ogle, Joanne Talesfore and Margaret Smith Members absent: Barry Waitte Staff present: Sandy Baily, Associate Planner Commission present: Barbara Cardillo, Community Services Commission VERBAL COMMUNICATIONS: None ITEM 1 115 N. SANTA CRUZ AVENUE AND 112 WILDER AVENUE Smith stated for the record that she lived and owned a business within 500 feet of the subject property and recused herself from the meeting. The Committee considered a request to amend the General Plan Designation from Medium Density Residential to Central Business District and change the zone from R-1D:LHP to C- 2:LHP for a portion of the parking lot parcel. Baily discussed the proposal which encompassed, numerous other applications for the site which included land use changes and new construction. O'Donnell moved to recommend approval of the General Plan amendment and Zone Change subject to the approval of the other applications associated with the entire project. Bourgeois seconded. Motion passed 7-0 with Smith recused. Smith returned to the meeting. EXHIBIT 17 2. An architectural element, lattice garden structure similar to the design that currently exists, or other feature should be added at the front elevation at the largest expanse of the wall to break up the wall. This action is an interpretation and is not appealable. ITEM 3: 115 N. SANTA CRUZ AVENUE The Committee considered revised plans to construct two new detached commercial buildings and to modify the exterior of the existing commercial building on property located in the Commercial Historic District. Burch moved that their previous direction to proceed to the next step with the following comments were still applicable: 1. Two detached structures are acceptable. 2. The southern structure should be redesigned to be more subservient (regarding style, scale and mass), to the mansion. 3. Consider a more transparent building. 4. The context of the mansion shall be protected. 5. The proposed exterior staircase on the mansion is recommended for approval Pacheco seconded, motion passed unanimously. ITEM 4: OTHER BUSINESS a. 114 Whitney Avenue - Representative was not present. No discussion. b. 46/48 Broadway - The Committee considered preliminary plans to restore a single family residence. The Committee was very favorable with the proposed changes. The Committee commented that the elongated character of the windows should be maintained. Architectural detailing and building materials will also be important to include on the plans. Cowan recused himself from the next item since he lives within 500 feet of the property. c. 146 Tait Avenue - The Committee considered preliminary plans to add onto and remodel a single family residence. The Committee expressed concern with the bulk and mass. Cowan returned to the meeting. d. 130 Massol Avenue -The Committee discussed ideas for an addition to a single family residence. The Committee stated that the house was well preserved and was the most original folk Victorian style house on the street. e. Possible meeting date change for the October meeting - Item dropped. EXHIBIT 18 2.-00 Dear Planning Commission, Please safe guard our Town Treasure, the Coggeshall Mansion. Do not approve any structures to be built in front of the mansion. It is your responsibility to protect our treasures for present and fixture generations. The Coggeshall Mansion needs to be seen in fall view not through a peep hole. Please deny the plans to build 2 structures on the front lawn of the Coggeshall Mansion by Mr. Sedgwick. Sincerely, C W Kathy Anderso ~ JAN 08 11,08 'OWN C)" L','; OS r~ PLANNING G u oiG J EXHIBIT 19 . IVE DEC 7 2007 TOWN OF LOS GATO;-- PLANNING DIVISION 7- 'Ile /I~,12 c r ~ r M ('I2103/20GV Sandy Baiiy - Poor Ypian for .truct~on at the Gnggeshaii Mansion Pa e ' From: Charlene Lebowitz <Iebowcha@garlic.com> To: <manager@losgatosca_gov> Date: 11/20/2007 8:27 PM Subject: Poor plan for construction at the Coggeshal) Mansion I was shocked and disappointed to read about the planned construction on the front lawn of the Trevese Restaurant. This is a beautiful and historic building that helps to make downtown Los Gatos unique. This construction would certainly detract from the ambiance in Los Gatos as well as at Trevese. I would like to register my feelings about this with the Los Gatos Planning Commission. Could you please tell me how to contact them? Thank you, Charlene Lebowitz (1010812007) Sandy Baiiy- Re: Stop Santa t f Wilder, LLC From: Barbara Spector To: pauljohannessen@comcast.net CC: Pamela Jacobs Date: 10/0512007 8:33 AM Subject: Re: Stop Santa Cruz Wilder, LLC Dear Mr. Johannessen, Thank you for bringing your concerns to my attention. I would urge you and all interested parties to remain involved with the process by attending any neighborhood, planning commission and/or town council meetings. By copy of this email, I am advising the town's Interim Town Manager of your issues Sincerely, Barbara Spector "Paul Johannessen" < pauljohannessen @com cast. net> 10105/07 7:13 AM Dear Vice Mayor Spector: Santa Cruz Wilder, LLC is proposing to make several changes to their properties at 115 North Santa Cruz Avenue and 112 Wilder Avenue. They propose, among many things, to add two small retail structures (so-called kiosks), one 600 and square feet and the other 1,000 square feet fronting North Santa Cruz Avenue and to convert a portion of the existing parking lot to a site for a new single family home and eliminating vehicle access from Wilder Avenue. I strongly object to these two proposed actions by these real estate developers posing as restaurateurs. One the many charms of the Coggeshall's Queen Anne Victorian is the expanse of its front yard. The two kiosks would destroy this unique setback. Also, the on-street parking among registered residents in the "100" block of Wilder Avenue is already very competitive. The introduction of a new residence at 112 Wilder and possibly multiple new automobiles to the neighborhood will only make a bad situation worse. Besides, I thought the Town Council usually requires a new business to demonstrate how they will add parking spaces not remove a dozen or more. Please stop these money grubbing speculators from ruining my neighborhood Thank you for your consideration, Paul Johannessen 123 Wilder Avenue 354-3719 P.S. Grant Sedgwick, Manager of Santa Cruz Wilder, LLC will be holding a so-called neighborhood meeting on October 13, 2007 at Trevese Restaurant from 10:00 AM until 11:30 AM to discuss their proposals. Daniel Rees 33 College Avenue RECEIVE'" > ~..r P.O. Box 1728 Los Gatos, California 95031 May 5, 2007 MAY - $-200/ TOWN OF LO . C,ATO PLANNING U.'VII&O N Town of Los Gatos 110 East Main Street Los Gatos, California 95030 Attention: Planning Department Dear Respected Planners: This letter is in regards to the proposed alteration to the. Cogshell .Mansion located at 113 North Santa Cruz Avenue. The current' property owner; Mr. Grant Sedgwick, has proposed placing retail. kiosks on the front:lawn of the property. , I am very much opposed to the construction of.any additional structures on the Santa: Craz Avenue exposure of the property. The addition of any additional development would detract not add to the interest of the Cogshell Mansion.and create an amusement park ambiance. 'It should be noted that the Cogshell Mansion is a historic asset to the community and the integrity .and the interest of the property should be preserved. It is stated in the article appearing_in the Los Gatos Weekly News 'Tuesday May 1, 2007) that there is no-indication of the type of businesses that would occupy the proposed retail kiosks. Mr.'Sedgwick has mentioned that he is-.proposih office space,for the second floor of the building and if the structure is not altered in nay noticeable way I see no reason to oppose that change. A proposed. development. of the adjacent parking lot on Wilder Avenue for a residential use is logical and intelligent land use and will be compatible with the neighborhood environment. It is my strong opinion that the proposed kiosks be given a negative declaration and the proposed construction of the kiosks be denied. Thank your for reviewing my letter and understanding my concerns. ours, Daniel Rees Cogshell Mansion Proposed Residential Building Site Wilder avenue NO TOWN OF LOS GATOS PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT los cajos Meeting Date: January 23, 2008 PREPARED BY: Sandy L. Baily, AICP Associate Planner APPLICATION NO.: Negative Declaration ND-07-10 Subdivision Application M-07-005 General Plan Amendment GP-07-01 Zone Change Z-07-001 Architecture and Site Application S-07-019 Conditional Use Permit U-07-020 Variance Application V-07-01 LOCATION: 115 N. Santa Cruz Avenue and 112 Wilder Avenue. 115 N. Santa Cruz is located on the west side of N. Santa Cruz Avenue approximately 175 feet north of Bean Avenue. 112 Wilder Avenue is located on the east side of Wilder Avenue approximately 150 feet north of Bean Avenue. APPLICANT: John Lien PROPERTY OWNER: Santa Cruz Wilder, LLC CONTACT PERSON: APPLICATION SUMMARY: Grant Sedgwick, (408) 655-9296 Requesting approval of 1) a lot line adjustment, 2) a General Plan amendment from Medium Density Residential to Central Business for a portion of the parking lot parcel, 3) a zone change from R-1D:LHP to C-2:LHP for a portion of the parking lot parcel, 4) conversion of an existing fine dining restaurant into a smaller fine dining restaurant on the first floor and office space on the second floor, 5) two new detached commercial buildings, 6) modification to the exterior of the existing commercial building, and 7) conversion of the existing parking lot which fronts on Wilder Avenue to a residential lot, on properties zoned C-2:LHP and R-ID:LHP. No significant environmental impacts have been identified as a result of this project, and a Mitigated Negative Declaration is recommended. APN 510-17- 065 and 071 EXHIBITS: 1-20 Previously Submitted 21. Letters from the public: Claudia Mann (one page), received January 22, 2008 Ron Martino (one page), received January 22, 2008 Larry Justo Arzie (two pages), received January 22, 2008 ATTACPMENT 8 Planning Commission Staff Report - Page 2 115 N. Santa Cruz Avenue January 23, 2008 Carol Carlson (one page), received January 23, 2008 Ronald Tate (one page), received January 23, 2008 REMARKS: Attached is additional correspondence from the public regarding the project (Exhibit 21). The following condition should be modified as follows for the Architecture and Site application. The change is in italics. APPROVAL: This application shall be completed in accordance with all of the conditions of approval listed below and in substantial compliance with the approved plans. Any changes or modifications made to the approved plans shall be approved by the Planning Commission, Development Review Committee, Director of Community Development or the Historic Preservation Committee, depending on the scope of the change(s). To ensure that the windows in the proposed buildings are not blocked to display merchandise, the following condition should be added to the Architecture and Site application. WINDOWS. The windows in the new buildings shall not be obscured in any way nor shall any material(s) or object(s) be affixed in any matter to the inside or outside surfaces of the glass, with the exception of allowed window signage. Prepared y. Sandy L. Baily, Associate Planner BNL:SLB:mde Approved by: Bud N. Lortz, Director of Community Development N:\DEV\REP0RTS\2008\ 115nsc. dsk. doc Planning Commission January 2:,2008 N 2 2 2008 Re: 115 N. Santa Cruz Ave. TOVVP R G'F LOS Ca/~TU CLERK DEPARTIMENT Dear commissioners, _ I am very concerned with the proposal for adding 2 new building in front of this historical mansion. People come to Los Gatos to shop because of the overall ambiance and not just to buy goods.' It is a total shopping experience for them not just a chore. By changing the look of tt heritage property we would be giving up a quality of life ~Te woxked so hard to maintain, and lesson the exp eriencc to ow customers who Inay just not come back. I see no enhancement in doing this to this property, We have the real thing sitting there with no need to attempt to make it better. It is part of our heritage that needs to be preserved and we must put a stop to any development pressures to change it. It is not easy to shop in Los Gatos with all the restaurant and personal service usages taking up parking. To eliminate the parking lot for this project at this point of time is inconceivable and only benefits the developer not the con =tmitty, To do this may have been originally suggested by the general plan committee but it was part of a ten year plan. oaf which 2 new public parking facilities were to have been built. This has not been accomplished yet so please don't cozzfczse the issue. They did not suggest we eliminate this lot without replacing it with new spaces. 1 am sure some sort of compromise can be worked out for everyone but in the meantime as a merchant and neighbor I respectfully request you send this project back to the drawing board until it provides some sort of community benefit. Sincerely, Claudia Mann The Maids Quarters =IBIT 21 I N T E R 1 O R S To: Town of Los Gatos Planning Commission From: Ron Martino JAN 2 2 2006 622 University Am! . Los Gatos, CA 9 32 Phone. 4o&3 941 ExTi301/1'4 C-'W::._ Jt:, G',A i OS Fax 4W395817 CLERK DEPARTMENT W ron@marfinointedors.com Fax: 408-354-8431 Date: 1.22.08 Phone: Pages. 1 Re: Coggeshall Mansion Development Plans CC: 0 Urgent 0 For Review 0 Please Comment 0 Please Reply 0 Please Recycle -Comments, I am the owner of the property at 111 N. Santa Cruz Avenue, adjacent to the Coggeshall Mansion. I support, in general, the development of small buildings in the front of the Mansion; however, I have concerns about the design and scale of the buildings. 1 feel that the architecture of the new structures should be more appropriate for the Victorian building they front. They should more closely emulate the Mansion, the materials and design of the new buildings should not make them appear as heavy and out of character as the proposed design suggests. I am also concerned that the larger proposed structure on the south side of the property is overscaled for the site; it conceals too much of the old building. Perhaps a lighter architectural design Victorian conservatory?) might allow the proposed building size to not dominate the site and the Mansion it fronts. Sincerely, V Ron Martino Planning Commission. Re: 115 N. Santa Cruz Ave. General Plan Notes General plan STA from Increasing d+ the fabric of the comm is an oasis of calm",... two Kiosks. I like the axchi without the brick to create r period. is this project comp prpj the loss of the parki G.P. Statement:.Requ, RECEIVED JAN 2 w 2008 TOWN OF LOS GATOS f~Lh.f~i~~~r.i~ i~lti/~S►Ota 0 -Z/ NT:Residents want to protect this community nent pressures ...................It should fit into ity and enhance the quality of life. "Los Gatos like the original description by the developer of adding `ure, sort of, and wish it was only made of glass and steel e of a conservatory greenhouse look befitting to the. )le to the general plan statement? In looking at the overall alone does not enhance the quality of life. s support of its neighbors and surrounding owners. Has this been achie G.P. Statement: Must p of the visible historical re CD.I,3.2 IMPACTS ON 4 projects shall consider any ad~ vicinity of the proposed proj4 I.4."Mu3t further the g ' the general plan and see if it T.P.I.6 CIRCULATIQ that we avoid major increases proposal. Santa Cruz ave is by a project it needs tWo be mit addition of two street front st for a parking space or con~ng'I space makes matters even, we come and stay to work or co the restaurant usage it was bel requiring remedy. T..I.1.2 Speaks to a PROJE parking, Staff most likely wit, that with the loss of approx 2( new office spaces there is deft circulation and parking patters T.G.6.1 and more r+elew for existing and proposed use: neighborhoods. I realize the supercede but a new projects. neighboring residential distric parking and what I will guess eserve small town character. This is one of the last Cations of the Town Character. 1HISTORICA.L LANDMARKS .............".All ease effect to historic landmarks and features on or in the ts." How does this one impact this historic landmark? t?} ib, of all elements of the +~Y." Lets review more of les, as it doesn't so far. This area spears to traffic =4 circulation and requires street capacity along with remedies for any development D for circulation and with any additional traffic caused gated. With the loss of the projects parking facility and the yes there is definitely more cars on the street either looking to shop there. The conversion of the second story to office Office space is single destination oriented and people nand leave. 'I'bis is obviously an increase in usage from. re. This would increase circulation to an E or r rating, .T REVIEW if the project impacts circulation and public say it does not impact anything. Logically we can assume parking spaces and 2 or more new retail spaces along with litely an impact to both the commercial and residential itty T.G.6.4 and requires we provide adequate parking to minimize impacts on surrounding residential ;BD has its own parking district and its conditions ould be analyzed at a minimum for the ctTects on the s. The loss of the parking lot will not provide adequate rill be at loa3t 20 employees there at any given time will FROM :DAVID/JUSTO FAX NO. :4003547042 Jan. 21 2008 06:40PM P2 neighboring residential distri , The loss of the parking lot will not provide adequate s create a hardship on the ncig rhoods requiring us to chaoSe the ENTIRE Almm. d Grove into residential parkin permits only instead of what we have. With the new MEDICAL OFFICE COMPL X coming on line soon on AMAIN ! T.it will compound mattem even wo"e, definitely increasing the street circulation to a E or F. T.1.6.7, Protect downtotrn residential neighborhood from the encroachment of downt#wn shoppers and employees. I think this section says it all. Any development that is detrimental to the neighborhoods is unacceptable. The existing lot is the keysto to this development. It keeps the cars where they belong. It allows for dual use by the n 'ghbors while not in use. It keeps the status quo. Without it ,it compounds the parking *and created by the 2 new buildings. Community design element. CDY I.2 Promote, enha ice and protect the functionality and appearance of the town commercial areas. CD.P.1.6 Avoid abrupt changes and scale and d nsity. CD.L7 .........Trees.... maximize for esthetics. Does this projeei protect the appearance of the area? Is the scale corroot for the historic building? Does relmoving the tree add or detract from the aesthetics? The palm tree and the redwoo4 need to be protected at all costs; they are both symbols of many of our historical properties. Get a Second opinion from a town selected arborrist to see if the Palm tree really has i vtten roosts. An equal, Palm tree can easily be replaced and easily transplanted. As I meutioued I' tike the idea' f putting Kiosks in front of this property. But they should be Kiosks and not the size re d. if smallerthey will add to tlu charm and interest of our C.B.D. We have numeroub and profitable stores between 300 and 500 sq. ft. To approve the project as request d is charting new waters an rrmwn no~"t sure-you should be creating land use policy by all wing this intensity of infill on Santa Cruz Ave. There are numerous pro tes wt par inp facilities that you would be opening a oor to allowing the same privilege to intensify, Instead of selling their parking lots they could just build on them. This wool create chaos if we allowed. When we joined the parking strict we were told we must declare all the square footage we wanted put into the par>cing district and that after that we could- not add more space.Gee how things change: The Town has since added th concept of ghost parking spaces for higher usage to join the district creating more into sificxtion but the situation of adding more square footage other that what is under the roof has ;never come up before. This is classic robbing Peter to Pay Paul, all smoke atad tmi~rors or creative reading of the rules. Reduction of space or usage is not uncommon, The mith Hawken building gave up 1000 gq feet whey they tore out the upstairs mezza nin . Napa Style lost 1500 sq. ft, when they removed thier mezzanine space as well. Sho*ld they then be allowed to add a second stony to their building and transfer parking 6redits7 Just because a property owners changes the use from restaurant to office does dot mean they have the right to build more space without providing parking. If this is Ot the rule then we need to change it I RECEIVED JAN 2 2', 2008 TOWN OF LOS GATOS 70 January 23, 2008 Joanne Talesfore Los Gatos Planning Commission Los Gatos, California Dear Joanne, 13ECEIVED JAN 2 3 2008 TOWN OF LOS GATOS PLANN!m-- m\fISION! As yotn- neighbor in Los Gatos since 1965, 1 hope you will vote in favor of saving the historical integrity of our downtown by voting against any buildings in front of the Coggeshall Mansion. The view of the mansion has already been compromised by the bank that was built next to it. I worry the downtown will start looking like a shopping mall and not the unique town we all know and love. I also have concerns about our parking in downtown and feel that the planning commission should not approve the building of a house on the parking l of behind Trevese. It is a constant battle to find parldng when you drive to dinner. That parking lot is always Rill. Carol Carlson Los Gatos z- CA 6666'66C'B0 'v ajoisajel ajndRgS auueOC W` 3 '}~t~~fyy l' 'G'lf~ ,Yh r, N %s ${A^{~ ~`9•~ kH*,,.. , , :f:r`dx"Y'"~M QC413X%'S:4P ^#r¢k}S{°~SC Nw^S 'Hp~ypa SthSydG'y(Y,y9y,'l 'x8~9~~1K$)p`}tR~~yll(430 `${YdR/ }If i 7' :h *5d' ' x ~ . . ~;,ryu~ryysyy ~ bdbDYiY»ticMY~u6ac5uwtY.Wri:nY. . - . aa.nR?p..1.MS.VR.'~vuyrartti 5 31 vprwYatcvuui:rcnaxxvaa-nvc<+merrr6vw[u . D i hOLM1fYd4YY14<..R4MMYSM S ) wiY.sttiv s.9<++.rv!aarfr+rrvnrrisssrmrvs.4axw /.!aNNMInuVb3TGd 35YlvpJSyyfXC!LAS1#fNrLhLVYn#N.t+i<DWx14kN:t..._NLd.,,S+,.rt::,+.r:.'•:r. t.t~:t~NYVU;IUr ~ w~s u+.wvWU^~+rcs nrnq-at4.acf rya.t~ivrrvmuir.+oma<,ryavr,[u~•..~NU•rr,~t~<. <r,r..+. DIVERSIFIED DEVELOPMENT INC. Sandy Bally Senior Planner 110 E. Main Street Los Gatos, CA 95030 ~~y C4 V JAN 2 3 2008 TOWN OF LOS GATOS Re: Letter In Support Of Application For Development Approvals For The Property Located At 115 North Santa Cruz Avenue City File Numbers M-07-005 And S-07=019 And Z-07-001 Dear Sandy Bally, I own the mixed use commercial/office building at 22 South Santa Cruz Avenue of which my development company (Tate Diversified Development) occupies the entire second floor. I also reside in the City of Los Gatos at 16679 Madrone Avenue. Therefore, I consider myself by all reasonable standards to be a very informed and concerned citizen. I am always cautious whenever' someone wants to do further development in our downtown commercial business district that might negatively impact the parking. The developer has met with me and presented me with a full explanation of this proposed addition to the existing commercial as well as the anticipated development of the residential lot behind the commercial. I feel that the small amount of the proposed new commercial space as being proposed is tasteful and respectful of the historical nature of the main commercial structure. I do not feel this minor amount of commercial will not negatively impact the parking. I do feel that the proposed redevelopment of the property will add to the City "Tax Base" without negatively impacting parking while at the same time respecting the historic nature of the property. I fully support this application and highly recommend approval of the proposed redevelopment of the property. Respectfully, 0 7d(Ron)~~ 22 South Santa Cruz Ave. Second Floor Los Gatos, CA 95030 408.399.4950 408. 399.4960 fax www. t a ted eve lop me lit. coin zH iWi ca a~~° I~ F V~Oo r+y V ~ D V P oQ a T 1 *T!,fl, T e~ e Glga o _ z 0- aasssa~~- . s r~ +on e I 1 0' I s ~ vi d I L I ~d ~ Fn o Sao gg ;3u ozw ~ z~ oW o s Q z FQ~ P ~GF(~ N N ,~jO pFE 3 FE+O'~'~F ~ ~ U7 - ,,,SON Q z (y 0 H tLZ ~"'V B ~MGZA _ of - z lo-l z o Z a ' i a F~ i l1`2 1 °y o x EE s ~q- --n paKg " 1 x i'o 9 jo~da7 ooo'oo E x C°~<gp000~ ~ /gin M_ n., f1 (lfl (l1 -k,. _hb~n pb.~e a a a ca.. F = 0. e cu N z 0 W ~ w a g" ~w ~ °~p ~ Oz a~ °a°rm ~ pQw mPOZ vaK~ od~~~ px> Ma~~ e 3 r 31o.wsfs o 9z W Z Q ' 0. (7 2 N = Q Q ~ N. Z o ~ F z < o p x w F N U] O 2 F- u ~W >p ~1 F w¢~o y x ~0Oo W OO U pau ves Q ° aaa 0 u J W z Q N a F. Lm _ o z y F 1~4r~~y! P I m x O Q W a z V z: x^ a 0 z H 3 'z U, "I 94 QNa aE~U) ~n G Nz o 0; Z M 4 P W a O ~ z ~ Gill m z ~ < s p H e, ~ HIM l Hi l a U P m H QQ ~ j ~ LL 5 z a v w w 0= o O^~ O'. w ~ Q z 0 V W 0 3 3 r ¢ C o_ on zj w f .J W rl h~ 5 3~ z E" a z W u' a 8 ~Nz O 02 xu'oau° 63 s aza .wa V _ Flu 3 9 o Q,~ o L I z o a. a 4 p F - ~ sZO ~ a 3~Z ~ i - O ~ I p o _ z I x o z 1 I i O N ~ z z I ~ u F I - zm ~'o ~ Fm zn , 16 ~ ~ ` , V .<0 ~ / 2 W3 2 'fit Ww I s zQ z °QZ q~ZW q ¢ M o W 0~6 b C &J N ~zF~ao Z~ c 06 ~ QQQ ~"u g a. Q 3 N , o v 7 I M ~.t 1111 y ~ ~ 1 ~.z ro f ab ~ - r r f, =7 r--7 T 1 r f 71 M M ma a INFORMATIONAL REPORT 115 NORTH SANTA CRUZ AVENUE LOS GATOS, CALIFORNIA PREPARED FOR THE TOWN COUNCIL HEARING 7 APRIL 2008. j UHN LIEN, ARCHITECT A7 rACrr 9 OHN LIEN ARC_ HITFCi 7 April 2008 Town Council Town of Los Gatos 110 East Main Street Los Gatos, CA 95030 RE: 115 North Santa Cruz Avenue, S-07-019 Dear Council Members: We have prepared this packet of information for your use in consideration of this application. While most of the information contained herein is also in your staff report it is our intent to focus your attention on the history of the review process and the sensitivity of our proposal to the multitude of issues at stake. When Grant Sedgwick, principal partner and long time Los Gatos resident, first contacted me to discuss this project we spoke at length about the depth and breadth of the issues that would be of concern to our community. I was reminded of the physician's edict to above all "do no harm". As an architect I have had the good fortune to practice my craft in this town, a community that pre-dates the automobile. As a result of being spared from "urban renewal" Los Gatos has a truly pedestrian downtown, a downtown worth protecting. I have lived here since 1973. In that time I have never brought an application before the town that I did not believe served the best interests of the community. I have always kept in mind that winning can sometimes mean losing, that unlike physicians we architects cannot bury our mistakes. I am certain that approval of this application will not only do no harm but will in fact preserve and reinforce the values this community holds dear. Sincerely, Lien 190 ~r4> ..,~3kt NOS) o NOS) isEI(,i)?j) ,9'l 5 -.},.r~<,, C{). t'l;1 .~1(,tsiL.°, t ~131C,17'k° Z{. a! INDEX OWNER'S STATEMENT SALIENT POINTS: HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMITTEE CANNON DESIGN GROUP STAFF REPORT PLANNING COMMISSION REVIEW INADEQUATE CONSIDERATION ILLUSTRATIONS IGNORED Plaza Plan View Analysis Streetscape Elevation Color Board CLOSING STATEMENT 0 OWNER'S STATEMENT Grant Sedgwick prepared these talking points for our presentation to the planning commission. I include them here because I believe they are more compelling, and especially illustrative of his understanding of the nature of the project we propose, than they would be if summarized in a 5-minute verbal statement. In his own words: • My partners and I are completely respectful of both the historic and architectural significance of the Coggeshall Mansion. You will know Mark DeMattei, as one of the most highly regarded builders of quality homes in the Bay area. The others, Jeff Hoffman and Rob Moore, are local real estate professionals, recognized by their peers for both integrity and accomplishment. As the company manager, my qualifications include a number of landmark historic rehabilitation projects, from One Market Street in San Francisco to the Hayes Mansion Conference Resort in San Jose. My own home on Hernandez Avenue is about 90 years old and was extensively renovated four years ago with restraint and good taste, according to my neighbors. • Grand old buildings do not survive and thrive without continuing investments by their owners. With changing times, appropriate land uses evolve and shift as well. Any number of examples can be found locally. One good example the San. Jose post office which has been renovated - and expanded - to house the San Jose museum of Art. Or the Hayes Mansion, once a grand estate, then a half way house and police training facility, finally renovated - and expanded - to house a significant conference center. • Some of you, we hope, have had an opportunity to visit Restaurant Trevese which so stylishly occupies the old home of the Charthouse. This new addition to the Los Gatos restaurant scene is attracting great attention throughout the region, as a restaurant of real distinction - worthy of the important home it occupies. This is an accomplishment of a partnership between Mike Miller, the executive chef, and Mike's family and our company which completely shared his vision of excellence, and invested in it. • The Coggeshall Mansion was built as a private residence. Its use has evolved through the years as a funeral home and dinner house. The next chapter of its history is being written now. This chapter contemplates a mixed use environment of fine dining restaurant, professional office and specialty retail uses. • The proposed additions of two small retail buildings - the gatehouse and the carriage house - will improve and enhance the setting of the historic residence. These Sunset Magazine Idea House Los Gatos, CA Built by Mark DeMattei Hayes Mansion Conference Resort San Jose, CA Co-Developed by Grant Sedgwwk (National Register of Historic Places) OWNER'S STATEMENT P. 2 buildings will help to define an intimate public space in front of the mansion - a space to which all are welcome. As it now stands above the front lawn and fence, the building is aloof from the sidewalk, almost forbidding. Its setting in the landscape reminds the passerby of the funeral home it was for so many years. We want this space to attract pedestrians, not repel them. • The new buildings themselves will be much lower in scale with less architectural embellishment and greater transparency than the historic structure. These attributes are very much intentional as we don't want the new buildings to compete with the old for visual attention. They will be occupied by retailers who demonstrate a similar commitment to excellence and good taste as does Miller's Restaurant Trevese. • Over the years, North Santa Cruz Avenue has also evolved - from a street of stately mansions to one with a lively retail scene. Some blocks are more attractive than others, though, to the pedestrian and shopper. The characteristics that make one block stronger than another include the mix of retailers, to be sure, as well as the absence of office uses, personal service businesses and financial institutions, on the ground floor - and continuity. The addition of two small, high quality retail establishments in this block will significantly improve the pedestrian experience moving north on Santa Cruz Avenue. • The south building (the Carriage House) will block the view of the later period, one story addition to the Coggeshall Mansion. However, this portion of the structure is not in any way historic and, to most observers, is not even attractive. • Your Historic Preservation Committee has considered this proposal on three separate occasions. The Committee recommended - and again confirmed - that the addition of our two retail buildings was acceptable in the context of protecting the historic structure provided the buildings were subservient in their design. The Town's consulting architect has considered this proposal twice. The modified design concept now before you incorporates the recommendations of Mr. Cannon's third option in his April 20, 2007 report. * Our comprehensive proposal, as you're aware, includes the net loss of 9 private parking spaces to make way for construction of a new single family residence on Wilder Avenue. The loss of parking spaces is completely offset, as planning staff has reported, by the reduction of parking demand in the proposed mixed of uses. Moreover, the replacement of a non-conforming commercial parking lot in an otherwise completely residential block of Wilder Avenue has to be seen as the reversing a bad land-use decision of years gone by. This was seen as a positive improvement by members of the CDAC during its review of our project in February 2006. • Renewal is an essential element of protecting and strengthening our unique downtown environment. The economic demands of maintaining and improving a 120 year old building to meet the needs of modern commerce in a way that is compatible with its contemporary neighbors requires creativity. This unique proposal is creative. The reduction of intensity in the restaurant use (from a 200 seat dinner house) makes possible the small, but important, retail additions. It also makes possible the rearrangement of parking spaces so that a home can be built on Wilder Avenue. This has an economic benefit, to be sure - one which will help fund the extensive repairs required to the electrical, heating, air conditioning and plumbing systems, roof, windows and floors of the Coggeshall Mansion. SALIENT POINTS The following are excerpts from the various reports prepared during the review of this application. All of them are comments or conclusions that support the merits of our project. HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMITME: These comments are included in the action letter following HPC's review of September 19,2007: "The committee stated that their previous direction to proceed to the next step with the following comments were still applicable: 1. Two detached structures are acceptable. 2. The southern structure should be redesigned to be subservient (regarding style, scale and mass) to the mansion. 3. Consider a more transparent building. 4. The context of the mansion shall be preserved. 5. The proposed exterior staircase on the mansion is recommended for approval." The plans were revised to: • Reduce the size of the southern structure. • Change the siding from plaster to fancy-cut shingles matching the mansion, including color. CANNON DESIGN GROUP In his second review of the project dated April 20, 2007 architect Cannon offered -4- options for redesign of the proposal. Option 3 suggested the following: 1. Increase the size of the larger [southern] structure. 2. Decrease the size of the smaller [northern] structure. The plans were revised as follows: • Deferring to the concerns of HHPC we chose not to increase the size of the southern structure but rather place some of its square footage behind the building and retain its reduced presence on North Santa Cruz Avenue. • The size of the northern structure was reduced and its plan re-oriented such that its footprint extends to the back and the elevation facing the street is substantially narrower. • In his report Cannon also recommended that the roof of the south building be revised, one of its two gable elements be removed and both of the proposed skylights be removed. All of these recommendations were incorporated into the plans. STAFF REPORT The staff report contains a variety of information and comments that favor approval of this application. Most important among them: SALIENT POINTS P. 2 P. 5: Streetscape: Staff recites marketing studies as follows: "Marketing studies show that shoppers take about seven seconds to form an opinion and lose interest when the continuity of the shopping experience is broken. Shoppers tend to stop at this site, look down the street, notice the bank immediately on the north side of the subject property, and turn around. Therefore, the restaurants and retail establishments immediately after the bank and further down the street, are impacted by the loss of shoppers.Staff believes that the area in front of the mansion could be improved to be more inviting and designed to create an interest to enter the site to enjoy the property and to create a public interest to continue north on Santa Cruz Avenue." P. 13 / Summary: Under item #6 staff states: "The two modest structures will frame the mansion. The southern building could be deleted but staff believes it will improve the retail vitality of the area and partially screen the non-historic addition to the mansion." Under item #7 staff states: "The outdoor dining should also be more visible and the plaza should be designed to incorporate seating areas and potentially two to three historically designed push carts could be allowed to create vitality to the plaza that would encourage pedestrians to enter the site. Providing visible activities and passive areas, the site [plaza] will activate the site, strengthen the retail streetscape in downtown, and promote pedestrian circulation." We believe staff shares our vision. The following exhibits "Plaza Plan" and "View Analysis" were prepared specifically to illustrate how the proposal addresses the points made by staff. Also included is the requisite "Colors and Material Board" which in this case is illustrated on the streetscape drawing showing the new buildings in their context. I z A { 47 E x ~J o z j z Q a z a wa _ - W O>a 0O 0 X ~Iil1 Oo z A wll~ - x w lz w a~ W O .-7 ¢ a Fem., w w 3 Q p a~ c~ w O C9 v' ~ w a ~~3 ~'t92r ( O 0 OOOO h A X O ~ tz c la. U Wo v c~ O t' O Q~ OV V O 44~ as -1 ' 75 (V 0 cr; a) cz 3. N W 3 W x F w O x z . _ LL, x ® v l Cl~ Q l~ - : ; f y l O cn w ca ca ~ y O O O w cu c~ o ~ (z 0 o ~ o Ca ~ I l z w o ~ v II ~e {I z Cj) II _ - H l ~ti ~ z ' ) `f k l i?! ' rI . + u r V) 0 w (v V o b Qo H cn O ~ ~ V O-A Z ua o cz cu _ mw w ~tt M co op H ~ z O a z ~ ~ a z ~ H ~ W ~ O ~ z Q a ~ w ~pp w O Q °2zz z 0 1 !zC1a~ i ~ O tW7 ~ w icFi,wUQ ;aorz N w ~ Q 0 .v x ~ ~ z i V G w w PLANNING COMMISSION REVIEW inn _ • Application S-07-019 - Architecture and Site Approval • Application U-07-020 - Conditional Use Permit • Application ND-07- Negative Declaration Application S-07-019 - Architecture and Site Approval The Planning Commission considered, as part of the application, a proposal to add two smaller retail structures on the site adjacent to North Santa Cruz Avenue, as well as three parking spaces (accessible from the rear alley) and an exit stair from the second floor of the principal building, on its north side. The Commission voted to approve the addition of the new stair, but to deny the proposed retail buildings and parking spaces. The applicant seeks relief from this decision because it believes the Planning Commission may have erred in its decision, based on the General Plan, and may have abused its discretion, based on the Town Code. Town Code Requirements • The application may not have even required Architectural and Site Approval because the proposal did not contemplate either the construction of a new principal building on the site, or the intensification of land use, as it is defined. Moreover, the proposed alteration to the existing commercial building was, and is, minor (Section 29.20.145). • The purpose of Architectural and Site Approval is to "regulate height, width, shape, proportion, siting, exterior construction and design of buildings to insure that they are architecturally compatible with their surroundings" (Section 29.20.140(d)). The Commission did not even discuss such design issues in its deliberations. Indeed the Chair initiated the discussion by suggesting, and the Members agreed by a show of hands, that the matter under consideration was not a design issue at all, but rather one of land use. • There was no discussion, or apparent consideration, given to any of the relevant matters prescribed in Section 29.20.150 such as site layout, exterior architectural design, lighting or drainage. • Outright denial of the proposal seems unreasonable, whereas Section 29.20.160 calls for a standard of reasonableness. General Plan Considerations Moreover, the application is consistent with many of the policies expressed in the General Plan of the Town of Los Gatos, yet the evidence on that subject was certainly not PLANNING COMMISSION REVIEW P. 2 discussed, and perhaps not even considered, by Commission members. By way of example: • The Land Use Element actually defines the CBD as a designation which "encourages ...a mixture of small town style merchants" and "integrates new construction with structures of historical or architectural significance and emphasizes the importance of the pedestrian". The two small retail buildings which are proposed, at 1,126 and 424 square feet, are entirely suitable for the needs of small merchants. The intimate pedestrian plaza, to be created in the forecourt of the historic mansion, and framed by the proposed retail buildings, will create a destination - and public oasis - for pedestrians. In contrast, the existing private grounds are very inaccessible, almost intimidating. • L.P.1.1 articulates a policy that "development shall be of high quality design and construction... (and) shall enhance the character and unique identity of existing commercial-neighborhoods". While the applicant believes that the proposal meets, or exceeds, these high standards there was no discussion of the merits of the design. • Importantly, L.P.6.1 encourages the "preservation, restoration, rehabilitation, reuse and maintenance of existing buildings". A substantial motivation of the applicant - and consequence of the development as proposed - is to create economic viability for the restoration and preservation of the historic Coggeshall Mansion, insuring that it remains a relevant contributor to the unique environment of downtown Los Gatos. That work has been started, with significant interior renovations, repairs to the roof, windows, floors and stairs, and extensive improvements to the air conditioning, electrical and plumbing systems. It's not clear that the Planning Commission even superficially considered the economic benefits of this comprehensive proposal. • Policy CD.P.3.2 and 3.7 respectively, encourage "adaptive reuse of commercial ....buildings" and "new structures within historic areas ...designed to blend and harmonize with the neighborhood". These polices are squarely addressed by the applicant's proposal, but even that evidence was not considered during the Planning Commission hearing. The Director of Community Development, writing on page 4 of the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the project states that "..introduction of the two new commercial buildings on the grounds of the project site would be considered to have a less-than- ~i gnificant impact on the aesthetic character of the property". Indeed, the Historic Preservation Committee considered the project on three separate occasions and determined "that the development of two detached structures would be acceptable for the project site" - and made three recommendations for refinement of the final design. The applicant struggles to identify any aspect of the proposal which is at odds with either a goal, or policy, of the General Plan. There are two policies, however, which appear to create a degree of tension by encouraging development which, at the same time, will PLANNING COMMISSION REVIEW P. 3 "preserve and promote existing commercial centers..." (L.P.1.4) and "preserve and protect historic structures..." (L.P.1.9). The applicant believes that the Planning Commission erred by too narrowly considering that any impact on the visibility of the historic mansion - from any angle and to whatever degree - trumped all other land use policies and community benefits. Not the least of these would be that the historic structure itself would be repaired, sustained and made more accessible to the public as a result of the proposed development. Finally, the Town's Commercial Design Guidelines are "intended to establish a balance that preserves and enhances the Town's livability while supporting the economic vitality that provides the resources for community services The applicant respectively submits that the Commission's decision failed to consider that balance. Application U-07-020 - Conditional Use Permit In order that the overall use of the property would have reduced intensity, with reduced parking requirements, the applicant has proposed to amend the Conditional Use Permit so as to reduce the maximum permitted seating in the fine dining.restaurant from 198 to 135. The Planning Conunission approved the proposed amendment - without approving other significant elements of the proposal - such as the new retail buildings and the relocation of three parking spaces to the east side of the alley. In the event the Town Council does not grant the applicant's appeal with respect to the Architectural and Site Approval application requested above, applicant respectively requests that the Conditional Use permit be amended to allow the maximum seating which can be accommodated by the parking which can be provided both on-site and within the Parking Assessment District. Subject to staff confirmation, the applicant estimates that either 6 or 9 additional seats should be permitted in that circumstance. Application ND-07-10- Negative Declaration Because the Commission approved the Mitigated Negative Declaration, in the form presented, but denied parts of the application under Architectural and Site Approval, as described above (namely the two new retail buildings and relocation of three parking spaces) the applicant respectfully asks Town Council to confirm the findings of the Negative Declaration in the context of the complete proposal. CLOSING STATEMENT We believe that the Los Gatos Planning Commission did not make a fair and balanced decision in its denial of our application for approval to build two small retail buildings and three parking spaces at 115 North Santa Cruz Avenue - the former Coggeshall Mansion which is now home to Trevese Restaurant. For the most part the Commission seemed to ignore, or dismiss without discussion, many of the relevant goals and policies of the General Plan which fully support this kind of redevelopment in the CBD. Moreover, there is a question whether in denying the buildings altogether, the Commission properly used the discretion granted to it under the Town Code provisions for Architectural and Design Approval. With regard to buildings of historical and architectural significance, such as the Coggeshall Mansion, it is easy (and perhaps our collective instinct) to refuse to consider any proposed change. It is far more of an intellectual challenge to consider how such buildings will not only survive, but continue to contribute to our Town's environment through evolution, reuse and rehabilitation. We believe the time and attention we've spent on this thoughtful proposal results in a solution that is worthy of more serious consideration. A number of controversial projects which have been proposed in Los Gatos over the past several years have also attracted outspoken and engaged opposition - only to be considered as 'modern landmarks' once they were completed. If members of Town Council look beyond the clamor and the negative email campaigns inspired by this application, they will recognize a sensitive, sound, respectful and potentially wonderful land use proposal. ~t