Staff Report - 14300 Winchester Blvd.
DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: MEETING DATE: 4/23/04 COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT April 15,2004 MAYOR AND TOWN TOWN MANAGER • CONSIDER A REQUEST TO MODIFY AN APPROVED PLANNED DEVELOPMENT
RELATING TO THE ALLOWED SQUARE FOOTAGE OF OFFICE SPACE ON PROPERTY ZONED CM:PD. AN ADDENDUM TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT HAS BEEN PREPARED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL
QUALITY ACT. APN 424-32-068. PROPERTY LOCATION: 14300 WINCHESTER . BLVD. FILE PROPERTY OWNER\APPLICANT: SOBRATO DEVELOPMENT COMPANIES. RECOMMENDATION: 1. . Hold the
publichearing and receive public testimony; 2. Close the public hearing; 3. Make the required findings (Exhibit A to Attachment 1); 4. Accept the Addendum II to the Envirohmental Impact
Report; 5. Direct the Clerk to read the title; 6. Move to waive the reading; 7. Introduce the Ordinance (Exhibit 2 to Attachment) to effectuate Planned Development Application PD-04-4.
DISCUSSION: Please refer to the attached staff report and exhibits for project discussion. Attachments: 1. April 20, 2004 Planning Commission report with exhibits A-H PREPARED
BY: -Bud N. Lortz, D'rector Community Development ',DEV 5LJZANNE\Council\Repol1s\Fwd to TC\Sobrato\14300Win-PDAH.wpd Reviewed by: 0:,3 Assistant Town Manager OIL Town Attorney __Clerk
Finance __Community Development Revised: 4/15/04 11:18 am Reformatted: 5/30/02
REPORT TO: FROM: LOCATION: Date: For Agenda
__ Agenda Item: --=2'--_ The Planning Commission The Development Review Committee 14300 Winchester Boulevard Planned Development Application PD':'04-4 Requesting
to modify an approved Planned· Development relating to the allowed square footage of office space on property zoned CM:PD. An Addendum to the Environmental Impact Report has been prepared
in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act. APN 424-32068. PROPERTY OWNER\APPLICANT: Sobrato Development Companies DEEMED COMPLETE: April 14, 2004 FINAL DATE TO TAKE
ACTION: October 14, 2004 FINDINGS: •• The Planning Commission must find that the zone change is consistent with the General Plan if the recommendation is for approval. The Town's Traffic
Impact Policy (Resolution 1991-174) requires a finding that the benefits of the project outweigh the project's associated traffic impacts. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: An Environmental Impact
Report (EIR) was prepared and certified by the Town on February 4, 2002, as required by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). AnAddendum to the EIR was prepared for the Planned
Development Amendment approved on January 20, 2004. A revised Addendum has been prepared for the modified project in compliance with CEQA. EXHIBITS: A. Required findings (one page) B.
Draft Planned Development Ordinance (30 pages) with revised development plans (23 sheets), received April 14, 2004 C. Applicant's letter (two pages), received April 8, 2004 D. Letter
from Netflix (one page), received April 9, 2004 E. Consulting Architect's recommendations F. Site plan comparison (two pages) G. Town Council Study Session Summary Minutes of March 12,2004
H. Revised Addendum to the EIR
The Planning Commission 14300 Winchester BoulevardJPD-04-4 Page 2 of 8 A. BACKGROUND: On January 20,2004, the Council approved a modification to the approved Planned Development (PD)
at 14300 Winchester Blvd. The approved project includes 120,000 square feet ofofficelR&D and 290 apartments, 51 of which are BMP units. Following the approval Netflix, a Los Gatos based
company, contacted the applicant to discuss the possibility of occupying the two office buildings for its corporate headquarters. Netflix is the world's largest onlineDVD movie rental
service. Members order online, and receive their order and return DVD's by mail. Netflix currently operates 23 shipping centers and plans to open more throughout the country. Netflix
would like to stay in Town and the Sobrato project provides that opportunity. However, Netflix has stated that more square footage is needed due to the company's successful business
operation and resultant expansion. Netflix currently operates in a building located at 970 UniversityAvenue. Due to its current success the company has outgrown that space. Netflix is
rapidly expanding and is looking for a new location to house the increasing staff. The company would like to stay in Los Gatos, but needs approximately 160,000 squ,are feet to accommodate
projected growth. Netflix has indicated that their current lease will expire in September 2005, and the company needs to move its corporate headquarters into an 80,000 square foot building
by then. An additional 80,000 square feet will be needed within two years of the move. Netflix has a two year option to occupy the second building. The approved Sobrato PD is proposed
to be increased by 40,000 square accommodate Netflix. On March 12,2004 the Town Council held a study session to discuss the applicant's proposal. The Council was receptive
to considering the requested change to the approved PO to the extent that Council directed staff to commence with an expedited review process that includes Planning Coinmission review.
Council requested that the Commission focus its review on the office component ofthe project, including the buildings, parking garage and the Winchester entrance to the site. Summary
minutes from the study session are attached as Exhibit G. B. DISCUSSION: Proposal/Project Design The applicant is proposing to expand the footprints of the two office buildings to increase
their size from approximately 60,000 to 80,000 square feet each. The total floor area would increase from 120,000 to 160,000 square feet under the modified plan. The residential portion
of the project will remain the same. The proposed expansion constitutes about a 8.9% increase in total project square footage. The cover sheet ofthe plans includes comparative data for
square footage, building volume, population, landscaping, impervious coverage, parking and traffic generation for the originally approved project, the modified project approved in January
2004. The Consulting Architect reviewed the revised plans and commented that the design of the office buildings is a marked improvement over the previous submittals. The Consulting Architect
has
The Planning Commission J4300 Winchester BoulevardlPD-04-4 . Page 3 of 8 several recommended changes to the design (see Exhibit E). The suggested changes will be incorporated into the
design during the architecture and site application process. The following table contrasts the office buildings for the approved PD (January 2004) and the modified project (current application):
maximum height 49'6" same building lengths Building A: 233' Building A: 258' Building B: 221' Building B: 255' building depths 128' both buildings same fIrst floor square footage Building
A: 24,000 Building A: 27,768 Building B: 24,000 Building B: 27,369 second floor square footage Building A: 19,000 Building A: 27,984 Building B: 19,400 Building B: 27,276 third floor
square footage Building A: 16,000 Building A: 24,373 Building B: 16,400 Building B: 25,471 building footprint sq. ft. 49,200 54,860 total square footage 120,000 160,000 The applicant
considered joining the two buildings in the area of the center courtyard instead of increasing the building footprints and expanding the second and third floors. However, this alternative
does not result in a signifIcant reduction ofbuilding mass and eliminates a usable outdoor space that is desired by Netflix, the center courtyard. If the two building were joined the
resultant single building would present a longer building mass along Winchester Blvd. and to the apartments behind. Additionally, it would eliminate the visual corridor through the site
to the creek area. Staff requested that the applicant and Netflix explore the possibility of use of basement or cellar space to reduced the mass and scale of the buildings. This option
was rejected because Netflix has very little space devoted to uses that would be appropriate for below grade areas. Further, the applicant and Netflix determined that it would create
functional issues over the lifetime of the buildings. Letters from the applicant and Netflix are attached as Exhibits C and D. . Size of Office Buildings The draft Planned Development
Ordinance (Exhibit B) includes a provision allowing the office buildings to be expanded to 160,000 square feet provided they are occupied by a corporate headquarters with a point of
sale (Netflix or other similar company). If this does not occur, the
The Planning Commission 14300 Winchester Boulevard/PD-04-4 Page 4 of 8 applicant will be restricted to the 120,000 square approved in January 2004. Prior to issuance of a building
permit the applicant will need to provide evidence demonstrating that the tenant will be Netflix or another corporate headquarters with a point of sale in order to secure the right to
160,000 square feet of office space. Parking The number of parking spaces. supporting the office buildings has increased from a total of 396 to 560. The parking ratio for the office
component has increased from 3.3 to 3.5 spaces/1,000 square feet at the request of Netflix. There is not an increase of surface paving or parking spaces and the added spaces are all
below grade. In addition, the number of shared parking spaces is reduced from 90 to 66. For these reasons staff does not have any concerns about the increase in parking. Flood Plain
The added level of below grade parking can be accotnmodated provided that the garage entrances stay at the same elevation. The 100 year flood plain elevation in Los Gatos Creek varies
from 259 to 257 at the southeast and northeast property comers, respectively, based on the January 22,2003 Letter of Map Revision prepared by the Federal Insurance Administration. These
elevations are 3-feet lower than the flood elevations presented in the certified EIR due to recently constructed downstream improvements. Town policy requires buildings and garage entries
to be placed 2-feet above the 100-year flood elevation. Underground garages may extend below the 100-year flood elevation if the garage drainage system is hydraulically isolated with
pumps and check valves such that the pipe does not siphon storm water into the garage. The method of garage drainage will be reviewed as part of the building permit process. Landscaping/Open
Space The increased sjze of the office buildings results in the following reductions in landscaping, hardscapeand/or building setbacks as shown on the site plans included as Exhibit
F: • landscape area between main entry and south property line reduced from 25 to 15 feet • driveway entry aisles reduced from 26 to 20 feet • center landscape island at entry reduced
from 22 to 10 feet • landscape area between entry and south end of building A reduced from 40 to 30 feet • closest comer of building A to front (West) property line reduced from 70 to
66 feet • distance between buildings (center courtyard) reduced from 60 to 52 feet at narrowest point • closest comer of building B to north property line has not changed (60 feet)
The Planning Commission 14300 Winchester Boulevard/PD-04-4 . Page 5 of 8 Project Phasing Sheet A6 of the development plans is a revised project phasing plan. Building A and a portion
of the below grade parking garage will be constructed as phase one. Building B and the remainder of the office parking garage will be constructed as phase two. The applicant has indicated
that the residential component of the project will be constructed concurrent with phase one. Grading The modified project generates about 20,000 cubic yards more export than the 2002
project. The truck trips associated with soil export will be spread over a two year period. Consequently the truck trips associated with the soil export are insignificant. However, should
the Planning Connnission or Town Council wish, the finish floor elevation of the office building(s) and/or the residential complex could be raised to reduce the· export volume. For each
foot the office complex is raised, export could be reduced by about 3,100 cubic-yards and for each foot the residential complex is raised export could be reduced by about .8,000 cubic
yards. Raising finished floor elevations will not impact site access or drainage but will make the buildings appear taller when viewed from offsite. Staff is requesting direction from
the Commission and Council on this issue. If a reduction in off haul is desired the details and implementation can be worked out as part of the architecture and site process. Benefits
of Netflix to Los Gatos Expansion of the office component of the Sobrato project to accommodate Netflix' growing corporate headquarters presents an important economic vitality opportunity
for the Town. Netflix established its corporate headquarters in Los Gatos in 1999, and it has grown to become the world's· largest onlineDVD movie rental service. Today, Netflix contributes
a number of tangible and intangible benefits to the community. It is expected that these benefits would grow with the continued presence of Netflix in Los Gatos. The
benefits of having Netflix in Los Gatos include the following: Sales Tax -Netflix is currently the number one provider of sales tax in Los Gatos. Sales tax revenue accounts for 30% of
the Town's General Fund revenues, which fund Town services such as public safety, library, parks and senior services. Based on Netflix' growth projections, their sales tax contribution
to Los Gatos is estimated to grow by 180% by 2007. Property Tax -Netflix currently pays property tax on any tenant improvements and business inventory (e.g., equipment, furniture, computers,
etc.), of which Los Gatos receives 9.5 cents for every dollar paid. It is expected that the property tax coming to the Town would increase significantly as the company absorbs the 160,000
square feet, completing tenant improvements and adding to the business inventory.
The Planning Commission 14300 Winchester Boulevard/PD-04-4 Page 6 of8 Employment and Transit Ridership -Netflix currently employs approximately 800 people, with about 150 located at
their Los Gatos headquarters. These positions are primarily in the managerial, administrative and technology areas. At 160,000 square feet, the proposed Netflix building will accommodate
approximately 750 employees. The current and projectedjobs represent potential job opportunities for Los Gatos residents in typically well-paying areas. At 750 employees, Netflix would
be the Town's largest non-hospital employer. The projected 750 employees also add to the potential ridership 'for the planned light rail facility terminating at Vasona Station. Corporate
Presence -In addition to the tangible benefits provided through taxes and jobs, Netflix contributes a valuable intangible benefit to the community through their corporate presence in
Los Gatos. At present, Netflix is receiving positive coverage in both popular and technology media media due to their leadership in the DVD rental service and to their significant growth.
In most cases, the company's location in Los Gatos is noted, giving the Town positive exposure. This can translate into name recognition for business location and, to a·certain extent,
for tourism. If Netflix' vision for becoming the world's leading Internet movie network materializes, it is likely that their media coverage and thus the exposure for Los Gatos would
continue. Another aspect of having Netflix' corporate headquarters in Los Gatos is that, in many cases, companies are active participants in the communities in which their corporate
headquarters are located. This can translate to support for art, cultural, and community events, and for civic and business purposes. Multiplier Effect -Although quantifying a multiplier
effect to the economy of business location is difficult, it is generally accepted that the presence of a company with local employees contribute to the economy beyond the revenues provided
directly to the jurisdiction. These additional contributions come in the form of spending by the employees, by business visitors to the company, and by the company itself. The presence
of this successful technology company in Los Gatos could also be a positive influence in attracting other technology companies to Los Gatos, which would also contribute tangibly and
intangibly to the community. Implications the Future While there are no guarantees that Netflix will continue to operate in Los Gatos and realize the projected growth, this is
the case with any of the Town's sales tax generators. Netflix has indicated a strong desire to remain in the Town and has an agreement with Sobrato Development Companies to lease the
office buildings within the Los Gatos Gateway project (see Exhibit D). The company has had steady sales tax growth to the Town since 2000. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: An Addendum to the Environmental
Impact Report (EIR) was accepted by the Town Council in January 2004. A revised Addendum has been prepared for the modified project (see Exhibit H).
The Planning Commission 14300 Winchester BoulevardlPD-04-4 Page 7 of 8 Traffic The traffic impact analysis states that the modified project (current proposal) will generate 105 fewer
daily trip, 76 fewer AM peak-hour trips, and 50 fewer PM peak-hour trips than the originally approved project. These figures are based on General Office Building traffic generation rates.
The General Office Building land use is based on multiple tenant occupancy .and results in higher trip generation rates than a single tenant occupancy would generate. The following chart
summarizes the net new trips andAM and PM peak period trips for the originally approved project, the modified project approved in January 2004, and the current application: Original
Project (2002)* Modified Approval (2004)* Current Application* Net New Trips 2,722 1,866 2,617 Net New AM Peak Hour Trips 348 210 272 Net New PM Peak Hour Trips 332 206 282 Current Application
as 2,091 Corporate Headquarters *analysis based on General Office and residential (apartments) 245 253 The initial occupant of the office space will be a single user who will locate
their Corporate Headquarters at the site. Based on Corporate Headquarters trip generationrates, the modified project will generate 23% fewer trips than the 2002 project. The traffic
analysis is based on General Office trip generation rates to provide a more conservative analysis and to allow for multiple tenant occupancy in the future. During the period the project
office space is occupied by a single tenant, however, the Town will experience substantially less traffic than is reflected in the traffic study. Further, the-PD Ordinance limits the
officelR&D space to a maximum of four tenants. The traffic report concludes that the revised project will generate fewer vehicle trips than the originally approved project and will have
a less than significant impact on intersections in Los Gatos and Campbell, including five Congestion Management Program (CMP) intersections. A condition is included in the Planned Development
Ordinance requiring the applicant to pay a traffic impact mitigation fee as required by the Town's Traffic Policy. C. RECOMMENDATION: Staffrecommends that the Commission receive public
testimony, discuss the project and formulate a recommendation to the Town Council. The Commission can indicate any individual concerns or comments for cons·ideration by the Council.
The Commission may also recommend any changes to
The Planning Commission 14300 Winchester BoulevardlPD-04-4 Page 8 of8 Conditions of the draft Planned Development Ordinance (Exhibit B). As previously mentioned, the Council requested
that the Commission focus on its review on the office component of the project, including the buildings, parking garage and the Winchester entrance to the site. It is imperative that
the Commissiort offer its recommendation at the April 21 meeting so that the Council may take action on the application on April 23. Adoption of Minutes At the conclusion of the meeting
the Planning Commission should adjourn and reconvene, after a short recess, for another meeting to approve the minutes. This will eliminate the need for a special meeting on April 21.
The Commission's discussion and recommendations will be provided to the Council in the form of FfR log notes and compact discs containing the FfR recording of the meeting. A revised
PD Ordinance will be prepared for Council if conditions are modified by the Commission. mmunity Development Prepared by: Suzanne Davis, Associate Planner BNL:SD cc: John Shenk, Sobrato
Development, 10600 N. De Artza Blvd., Suite 200, Cupertino, CA 95014 David Hyman, Netflix, 970 University Avenue, Los Gatos, CA 95032 N:IDEVlSUZANNElPOREPORTSI14300WinchestenI4300Win-PDAIlI.wpd
PLANNING COMMISSION -APRIL 20, 2004 TOWN COUNCIL -APRIL 23, 2004 REQUIRED FINDINGS FOR: 14300 Winchester Boulevard Planned Development Application PD-04-4 Requesting to modify an approved
Plmmed Development relating to the allowed square footage of office space on property zoned CM:PD. An Addendum to the Environmental Impact Report has been prepared in accordance with
the California Enviroillnental Quality Act. APN 424-32-068. FINDINGS Required consistency with the Town's General Plan: • That the proposedZone Change is internally consistent with the
General Plan mld its Elements. Traffic Policy: The deciding body must make specific findings which demonstrate that the benefits ofthe project outweigh the impact in order to approve
the project. N:IDEv\FINDlNGSI14300-14350Win-PDAwpd Exhibit A
ORDINANCE ORDINANCE OF THE TOWN OF LOS GATOS AMENDING THE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AT WINCHESTER BOULEVARD (ORDINANCE 2126) THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF LOS GATOS
DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I Ordinance 2095 for the Planned Development at 14300 & 14350 Winchester Boulevard as shown on the map attached as Exhibit A is hereby amended as follows.
SECTIONll The amended PD (Planned Development Overlay) zone established by this Ordinance authorizes the following construction and use of improvements: 1. Construction of a office/research
and development (R&D) complex up to 120,000 square feet, as shown in the conceptual development plans attached to Planned Development Ordinance 2126, and 290 residential apartments including
239 market rate and 51 Below Market Price (BMP) units. The office/R&D complex may increase in size up to 160,000 square feet upon proof of a binding lease with the appropriate company
that the occupant will be a corporate headquarters (as defined by the Institute of Traffic Engineers Design Manual) that generates sales tax to the Town of Los Gatos. 2. Landscaping,
parking, and other site improvements shown and required on the Official Development Plan (Exhibit B); 3. Uses permitted are residential, non-medical office and research and development
(R&D), subject to Section 29.80.085, and those uses specified in the underlying CM Exhibit B
(Controlled Manufacturing) zone by Sections 29.70.220 (Permitted Uses) and 29.20.185 (Table of Conditional Uses) of the Zoning Ordinance, as those sections exist at the time of the adoption
of this Ordinance, or as they may be amended in the future subject to any restrictions or other requirements specified elsewhere in this ordinance including, but not limited to, the
Official Development Plan. Retail and a daycare center are also authorized uses subject to approval of an architecture and site application to determine the location and square footage
of either use in a manner that is otherwise consistent with this ordinance. However, no use listed in Section 29.20.185 is allowed unless specifically authorized by this Ordinance. 4.
The office/R&D complex is limited to a maximum of four tenants.. SECTION III COMPLIANCE WITH OTHER DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS All provisions of the Town Code apply, except when the Official
Development Plan specifically shows otherwise. SECTIONN Architecture and Site Approval is required before any constmction work for the project is performed, whether or not a permit is
required for the work and before any permit for constmction is issued. Construction permits shall only be issued in a manner complying with Section 29.80.130 of the Zoning Ordinance.
SECTION V The attached Exhibit A (Map) and Exhibit B (development plans received by the Town of Los Gatos on April14, 2004, 23 sheets), incorporated herein by this reference, are part
ofthe Official Development Plan. The development plans received by the Town of Los Gatos on December 4, 2
2003 are still valid for the residential component of the project. The following must be complied with before issuance of any grading, demolition or construction permits, unless otherwise
stated: TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT: Planning Division 1. ARCHITECTUREAND SITE APPROVAL REQUIRED. A separate Architecture and Site application shall
be required for the office/research and development (R&D) buildings, apartment buildings, parking areas and landscape improvements. This application may be approved by the Town's Development
Review Committee. 2. OFFICIAL DEVELOPMENT PLANS. The Official Development Plans provided are conceptual in nature. Final footprints and building designs shall be determined during the
architecture and site approval process. 3. BUILDING SIZES. The size of the officelR&D complex shall be up to 120,000 square feet (160,000 square feet if occupied by a corporate headquarters
with a point of sale), inclusive of any conference facilities, cafeteria, fitness center or other amenities. The size and composition of the apartment buildings shall be refined as part
of the architecture and site approval process. The maximum number of apartments is 290. The final size of the office buildings may be increased or decreased provided that the total floor
area does not exceed 120,0001160,000 square feet, as applicable. 4. BELOWMARKETPRICE PROGRAM. The developer shall designate 51 ofthe residential units as BMP rental units. A deed restriction
shall be recorded prior to of building permits stating that the BMP units must be rented as below market price units pursuant to the Town's BMP requirements in place
at the time of the Planned Development approval. 3
The BMP units shall be low income (less than 80% of median income). The unit mix identified in the January 20, 2004 Desk Item to the Town Council may be modified to allow additional
studio and one bedroom units through the architecture and site review process. 5. COMMUNITY BENEFIT. The applicant shall enter into an agreement with the Town for provision of the community
benefits being offered with the project as listed in the letter from the applicant dated May 14,2003 (Exhibit A to the October 22, 2003 Report to the Planning Commission). The agreement
shall include details on the timing and implementation of each item and shall be approved by the Town Council prior to issuance of any building permits for the project. A garage/foundation
permit may be issued prior to the Town Council approval of the Community Benefit Agreement. 6. LANDSCAPING. The planting along Los Gatos Creek shall be riparian ground covers, understory
vegetation and trees selected from the California Department of Fish & Game's Riparian Vegetation List. 7. LANDSCAPEPLAN. The final landscape plan shall be reviewed by the Consulting
Arborist as part of the Architecture & Site approval process. All Tree Protection measures recommended by the Consulting Arborist shall be followed. 8. **CULTURAL RESOURCES MITIGATION
MEASURE 4.8-1. If it is demonstrated that there are intact deposits of significant archaeological materials, a plan for the mitigation of impacts to these resources shall be submitted
to the Planning Division for approval prior to resumption of construction activities in the area of identified deposits. If cultural or archaeological resources are uncovered during
construction, all work mu::>t be halted within a 50-foot radius of the find, the Community Development Director shall be notified, and a qualified archaeologist must be retained to examine
the find, determine its significance and4
make appropriate recommendations. Project personnel shall not alter the materials or their context or collect cultural resources.. The cost of the Town retaining a qualified archaeologist
shall be paid for by the property owner/developer. Ifhuman remains are
discovered, the Los Gatos Police Department and Santa Clara County Coroner shall immediately be notified. The Coroner would determine whether or not the remains were Native American.
If the Coroner determines that the remains are not subject to his or her authority, the Coroner shall notify the Native American Heritage Commission, who would attempt to identify descendants
of the deceased Native American. 9. TREEREMOVALPERMIT. A Tree Removal Permit shall be obtained prior to the issuance of a Building, Grading Qr Encroachment Permit. 10. RECYCLING. All
wood, metal, glass, and aluminum materials generated from the. demolished structure shall be deposited to a company that will recycle the materials: Receipts from the company(s) accepting
these materials, noting type and weight of material, shall be submitted to the Town prior to the Town's demolition inspection. 11. LIGHT RAILEXTENSION. The developer shall participate
and assist theTown in working with the Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority (VTA) in extending the light rail line from Campbell to the project site. 12. . PARKING. The minimum
parking ratios for the project are 3.1 spacesllOOO square feet for the office buildings and 1.8 spaces/unit for the apartments. The area between the office and residential is
identified as shared parking. Parking spaces may be removed to accommodate the future light rail station, a sidewalk along the property frontage or improvements deemed appropriate
by theDirector ofCommunity Development provided that the number of spaces does not fall below the minimum levels. Any changes to the parking5
layout shall be first approved by the Ditectors of Community Development and Parks & Public Works. Wheel stops are not permitted and shall be deleted from the plans. Parking spaces shall
be double striped per Town standards. 13. RIPARIAN CORRIDOR. Riparian planting shall be on the creek side of the trail, and a drinking fountain shall be included alongside the creek
trail if permitted by the Santa Clara Valley Water District. 14. NETWORK ACCESS. Network access shall be provided in the outdoor common area for the office buildings, to allow people
to work outside. 15. PROJECT SIGNS. A sign program shall be proposedby the applicant shall be reviewed and approved by the Director of Community Development prior to issuance
of any sign permits for the project. Any signs to be placed on the site, including a monument sign, building signs for both the office and residential components and directional signs
shall be included. 16. PRQJECT PHASING. The project may be phased as shown on the Phasing Plan included in Exhibit B. Time frames for phasing of project components shall be approved
through the Architecture and Site review process. The Phasing Plan shall include provisions for landscaping and other attractive low maintenance improvements, and security and maintenance
of the land to be developed under phase two. 17. ARCHITECTURAL DETAILS. The applicant shall continue to work with Planning staff and the Consulting Architect to refine the plans through
the Architecture & Site review process. Building elevations shall be refined as recommended in the Consulting Architect's report dated March 29, 2004. The applicant shall submit a final
set of plans that includes all changes reflected in the conditions of approval. 6
Building Division 18. **GEOLOGIC MITIGATION MEASURE 4.3-1: Prior to issuance of any building permits, project plans shall demonstrate compliance with 1997 Uniform Building Code requirements
for structural and seismic loads and recommendations made by Lowney Associates, as required by the Building Division.· 19. . **GEOLOGIC MITIGAnONMEASURE 4.3-2: The undocumented fill
on the site shall be completely removed and replaced with engineered fill in order to minimize differential settlement and possible damage to the buildings. In addition, sheet piles
that were left in place shall be cut and removed during excavation activities. 20. **AIR QUALITY MITIGATION MEASURE 4.6-1. Construction activities shall comply with the "Basic Control
Measures" and applicable "Optional Control Measures" for dust:: emissions as outlined in the Bay Area Air Quality Manageinent District CEQA Guidelines. 21. PERMITS REQUIRED: Abuilding
permit shall be required for the construction of each new structure. Separate building permits are required for site retaining walls, swimming pools, etc; separate electrical, mechanical,
and plumbing permits shallbe required as necessary. 22. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL. The Conditions of Approval shall be stated in full on the cover sheet of the construction plan submitted
for building permit. 23. PLANS. The construction plans for this project shall be prepared under direct supervision of a licensed. architect or engineer (Business and Professionals Code
Section 5538). 24. SOILS REPORT. Two copies 'of a soils report, prepared to the satisfaction of the Building Official, containing foundation and retaining wall design recommendations,
shall be submitted with the building permit application. This report shall be prepared by a licensed7
civil engineer specializing in soils mechanics. ALTERNATE: Design the foundation for an allowable soils I,000 psfdesign pressure (Uniform Building Code Volume 2 -Section 1805). 25. FOUNDATION
INSPECTIONS. A pad certificate prepared by a licensed civil engineer or land surveyor shall be submitted to the project building inspector upon foundation inspection. This certificate
shall certify compliance with the recommendations as specified in the soils report and the building pad elevation and on-site retaining wall locations and elevations are prepared according
to approved plans. Horizontal and vertical controls shall be set and certified by a licensed surveyor or registered civil engineer for the following items: a. Pad elevation b. Finish
floor elevation c. Foundation corner locations 26. TITLE 24 ENERGY COMPLIANCE. California Title 24 Energy Compliance forms CRIR and MF-IR shall be printed on the construction pla.ns.
27. TITLE 24 ACCESSIBn.,ITY - On-site parking facilities shall comply with the latest California Title 24 Accessibility Standards. Accessibility parking shall
be provided for in both covered and uncovered parking areas. 28. TITLE 24 ACCESSIBn.,ITY -COMMERCIAL-2. On-site general path of travel shall comply with the latest California Title 24
Accessibility Standards. Work shall include, but shall not be. limited to, accessibility to building entrances from parking facilities and sidewalks. 29. TITLE 24 ACCESSIBn.,ITY -COMMERCIAL-3.
The buildings shall comply with the latest California Title 24 Accessibility Standards. Necessary work shall be first investigated by the design architect then confirmed by Town staff.
8
30. SPECIAL lNSPECTIONS. When a special inspection is by UBC Section 1701, the architect or engineer of record shall prepare an inspection program that shall be submitted
to the Building Official for approval prior to issuance of any building permits, in accordance with UBC Section 106.3.5. Please obtain Town Special Inspection form from the Building
Division Service Counter. The Town Special Inspection schedule shall be printed on the construction plans. . . 31. NON-POlNT SOURCE POLLUTION STANDARDS. The Town standard Santa Clara
Valley Non-point Source Pollution Control Program specification sheet shall be part of plan submittal. The specification sheet is available at the Building Division service counter.
32. GARAGE EGRESS. The underground parking garage for Phase I of the project (office component) shall have a secondary means of egress to the satisfaction of the Building Official. Two
means of egress shall be maintained until the completion of the phase two garage. 33. ADDITIONAL AGENCY APPROVALS REQUIRED. The project requires the following agency approvals before
issuance of a building permit: a. West Valley Sanitation District 378-2407 b. Santa Clara County Fire Department: 378-4010 c. Campbell Union High School District: 371-0960 Note: Obtain
the' school district forms from the Town Building Department, after the Building Department has approved the building plans. TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE DIRECTOR OF PARKS AND PUBLIC WORKS:
Engineering Division 34. **HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY MITIGATION MEASURE 4.4-3. Note: the permit process and storm water management requirements have been updated9
since the EIR was prepared. A Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) shall be prepared prior to start of construction. The SWPPP and project plans shall be reviewed by the Town
Engineering staff, and any applicable meaS!1res contained in the amended provisions C.3 and C.14 of Order 01-024 shall be incorporated. The SWPPP shall be in conformance with the Santa
Clara County NPDES Permit as amended by the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) on October 17,2001. The SWPPP shall be approved concurrently with the grading,
drainage and erosion control plans. 35. **TRANSPORTATION & TRAFFIC RECOMMENDATIONS: a. The Winchester Boulevard driveway shall be striped as an exclusive left-turn lane plus a shared
through/right-turn lane. The northbound left-tum pocket at this intersection shall be lengthened to provide adequate storage as Fa1tof the intersection modification in coordination with
the Town afLos Gatos and Caltrans. b. Pedestrian and bicycle facilities shall be provided at the Winchester Blvd. driveway and along A Street to Knowles Drive. Safe railroad crossing
points shall also be provided at the Winchester driveway access. Sidewalks to accommodate both pedestrians and bicycles shall be provided between the Winchester Boulevard/northbound
SR 85 on-ramp/site driveway intersection and the project site on both sides of the driveway. In addition, any street improvements along the Winchester Boulevard site frontage shall include
or acc9mmodate planned bike lane improvements as specified in General Plan Policy T.I.5.1 O. Feasibility of all off-site measures 'will need to be determined by the Town since the applicant
does' not own the property where these improvements are recommended to be located. 10
c. The VTA and Town shall determine feasibility of the applicant providing the recommended bus stop on Winchester Boulevard, but maintenance responsibilities will be either the VTA's
or Town's. d. Since fiber optic cable facilities are located within the Union Pacific Railroad Company right-of-way, the applicant shall contact Union Pacific before project constmction
to determine whether such facilities could be affected by the project. e. The proposed four-foot wide pedestrian path along the southern project boundary (connecting the creek trail
and the future light rail· station) shall be widened to provide a multi-use trail connection between the creek trail and Winchester Boulevard/the future light rail station. This trail
shall be available to pedestrians and bicyclists. 36. **TRANSPORTATION & TRAFFIC RECOMMENDATIONS: The following provisions or improvements shall be made: a. Loading areas shall be designed
to ensure the intended tmcks can be accommodated. b. Well-lighted pedestrian and bicycle paths between buildings, transit locations, and bicycle parking should be provided. c. Bicycle
racks should be provided for short-term visitor parking and bicycle lockers should be provided for project employees in accordance with VTA Guidelines. 37. NOTICE OF INTENT. A Notice
of Intent (NOI) shall be filed with the San Francisco Bay RWQCB. A copy of the NOI shall be provided to the Town Engineering Division. 38. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT SECURITY. The applicant
shall supply suitable securities for all public improvements that are a part of the development in a form acceptable to the Town in the amount of 100% (performance) and 100% (labor and
material) prior to issuance of any permit. Applicant shall provide two (2) copies of documents verifying the cost of the public 11
improvements to the satisfaction of the Engineering Division of the Parks and Public Works Department. 39. DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT. The Applicant shall enter an agreement to construct
public improvements in accordance with Town Code §24.40.020. 40. GRADING PERMIT. A grading permit is required for site grading and drainage. The grading permit application (with grading
plans) shall be made to the Engineering Division of the Parks & Public Works Department located at 41 Miles Avenue. The grading plans shall include final grading, drainage, retaining
wall location, driveway, utilities, structural drawings for retaining walls, and interim erosion control. Grading plans shall list earthwork quantities and a table of existing and proposed
impervious areas. Unless specifically allowed by the Director of Parks and Public Works, the grading permit will be issued concurrently with the building permit. The grading permit is
for work outside the building footprint(s). A separate building permit, issued by the Building Department on E. Main Street is needed for grading within the building footprint. 41. SCVWD
APPROVAL. The following Santa Clara Valley Water District approvals shall be obtained: a. Aletter from the Santa Clara Valley Water District indicating they have reviewed and approved
the site retaining wall structural plan, grading plan, and public improvement plan shall be provided prior to issuance of a either a grading or encroachment permit. b. Any work within
50-feet of the top of the Los Gatos Creek bank or within the vicinity ofSCVWD water transmission facilities will also require a District permit. Evidence of such permits shall be provided
to the Engineering Division of Parks and Public Works prior to issuance of the grading and encroachment permit. 12
42. RI?TAINING WALLS. A building permit, issued by the Building Division, is required for all site retaining walls. In addition, site retaining wall plans shall also be submitted to
the Engineering Division of Parks and Public Works as part of the grading permit submittal. Engineering will review the plans for construction clearances to property lines. 43.· SOILS
REPORT. One copy of the soils report shall be submitted with the grading permit or public improvement application, whichever is submitted first. The soils report shall include specific
criteria and standards governing site grading, drainage, pavement design, retaining wall design and erosion control. The reports shall be signed and "wet stamped" by the engineer or
geologist, in conformance with Section 6735 of the California Business and Professions Code. 44. SOlLS REVIEW. Prior to issuance of any permit, the applicant's soils engineer shall review
the final grading and drainage plans to ensure that designs for foundations, retaining walls, site grading, and site drainage are in accordance with their recommendations and the peer
review comments. The applicant's soils engineer's approval shall then be conveyed to the Town either by letter or by signing the plans. 45. SOlLS ENGINEER CONSTRUCTION OBSERVATION. During
construction, all excavations and grading shall be inspected by the applicant's soils engineer prior to placement of concrete and/or backfill so they can verify that the actual conditions
are as anticipated in the design-level geotechnical report, and recommend appropriate changes in the recommendations contained in the report, if necessary. The results of the construction
observation and testing should be documented in an "as-built"letter/report prepared by the applicants soils engineer and submitted to the Town before final release of any occupancy permit
is granted. 13
46. PUBLICWORKS INSPECTOR. The applicant shall fund afull time public works inspector for the duration of the earthwork and public improvement operations. The applicant will be charged
on a time and materials basis. A deposit for the full amount, to be estimated by the Town based on the Contractor's approved schedule, shall be paid prior to issuance of the grading
and encroachment permits. 47. PARCEL MAP. A parcel map shall be recorded. Two copies of the parcel map shall be submitted to the Engineering Division of the Parks & Public Works Department
for review and approval. Submittal shall include closure calculations, title reports and appropriate fee. The map shall be recorded before any permits are issued. 48. DEDICATIONS. The
following shall be dedicated on the parcel map or by 'separate instrument. The dedications shall be recorded before any permits are issued. a. Winchester Driveway. An easement of width
and type specified by the PUC shall be granted by separate instrument. b. Public Service Easement Easement (PSE). All on-site roadways shall be within PSE's, as required. c. Ingress-egress,
storm drainage and sanitary sewer easements, as required. d. Emergency Vehicle Access Easements (EVAE). All on-site roadways shall be within EVAE's, as required. 49. TRUCKACCESS. Site
design presented at Architectural and Site review shall accommodate a WB-50 truck. 50. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS. The following improvements shall be installed by the developer. Plans for
those improvements shall be prepared by a California registered civil engineer, reviewed and approved by the Town, and guaranteed by contract, Faithful 14
Performance Security and Labor & Materials Security before the issuance of a building permit or the recordation of a map. The improvements must be completed and accepted by the Town
before a Certificate of Occupancy for any new building can be issued. Public improvements shall include the following: a. Winchester Boulevard/Highway 85 Intersection: Modify the intersection
and the signal of the main driveway with Winchester Boulevard. The Town and Cal Trans shall approve the preliminary intersection and signal plans prior to start of final design by the
applicant. Intersection plans shall include improvements to the rail road crossing. b. Winchester Boulevard: Entrance drive, railroad crossing, two street lights, tie-in paving, signing,
striping, storm drainage and sanitary sewers, sidewalk on both sides of entry drive, new bus stop to VTA standards, access ramps, right tum pocket, bike lane, median modifications, as
required. c. A Street: Sidewalk between project and Knowles shall be provided. The developer shall make a good faith attempt, to the satisfaction of the Public Works Director, to obtain
sidewalk rights from the adjacent property owner. In the event that such an effort fails, the developer shall work with the Town to provide the walk v,:ithin the existing right of way.
Details of provisions to be provided shall be addressed prior to issuance of an encroachment permit. 51. ARBORIST REVIEW. The Town Consulting Arborist shall review and approve both the
grading and public improvement plan sets prior to issuance of a grading or encroachment permit. 15
16
shall be calculated from the final plans using the rate schedule in effect at the time of the building permit application, and shall be based on the net increase in trip generation as
determined by the traffic analysis prepared by Fehr and Peers. 57. ECO PASS. Eco Pass stickers shall be provided for all full-time employees within the development upon request. Proof
of Eco Pass purchases shall be provided to the Town annually. 58. PLAN CHECK FEES. Plan check fees shall be deposited with the Town prior to submittal of plans to the Engineering Division
of the Parks and Public Works Department. 59. INSPECTION FEES. Inspection fees shall be deposited with the Town prior to issuance of any Permit or recordation of the Final Map. 60. GENERAL.
All public improvements shall be made according to the latest adopted Town Standard Drawings and the Town Standard Specifications. All work shall conform to the applicable Town ordinances.
The adjacent public right-of-way shall be kept clear of all job related dirt and debris debris at the end of the day.. Dirt and debris shall not be washed into storm drainage facilities.
The storing of goods and materials on the sidewalk and/or the street will not be allowed unless a special permit is issued. The developer's representative in charge shall be at the job
site during all working hours. Failure to maintain the public right-of-way according to this condition may result in the Town performing the required maintenance at the developer's expense.
. 61. ENCROACHMENT PERMIT. All work in the public right-of-way will require a Constmction Encroachment Permit. All work over $5,000 will require construction security. 62. PUBLIC WORKS
INSPECTIONS. The developer or his representative shall notify the Engineering Inspector at least twenty-four (24) hours before starting an work pertaining to 17
on-site drainage facilities, grading or paving, and all work in the Town's right-of-way. Failure to do so will result in rejection ow work that went on without inspection. 63. DUST CONTROL.
Blowing dust shall be reduced by timing construction activities so that paving and building construction begin as soon as possible after completion of grading, and by landscaping disturbed
soils as soon as possible. Further, water trucks shall be present and in use at the construction site. All portions of the site subject to blowing dust shall be watered as often as deemed
necessary by the Town, or a minimum of three times daily in order to insure proper control of blowing dust for the duration of the project. Watering on public streets shall not occur.
Streets will be cleaned by street sweepers or by hand as often as deemed necessary by the Town Engineer, or at least once a day. Watering associated with on-site construction activity
shall take place between the hours of 8 a.m. and 5 p.m. and shall include at least one late-afternoon watering to minimize the effects of blowing dust. All public streets soiled or littered
due to this construction activity shall be cleaned and swept on a daily basis during the workweek t<;> the satisfaction of the Town. Demolition or earthwork activities shall be halted
when wind speeds (instantaneous gusts) exceed 25 MPH. All trucks hauling soil, sand, or other loose debris shall be covered. 64. SURVEYING CONTROLS. Horizontal and vertical controls
shall be set and certified by a licensed surveyor or registered civil engineer qualified to practice land surveying, for the following items: a. Retaining wall--top of wall elevations
and locations b. Toe and top of cut and fill slopes 65. PRECONSTRUCTION PAVEMENT SURVEY. Prior to issuance of a Grading Permit, the project Applicant shall complete a pavement condition
survey documenting the extent of 18
existing pavement defects using a 35-mm ordigital video. camera. The survey shall extend the full length of the truck haul route within the Town limits. The results shall be documented
in a report and submitted to the Town for review. 66. .POSTCONSTRUCTION PA SURVEY. The project Applicant will complete a pavement condition survey to determine whether road
damage occurred as a result ofproject construction and whether there were changes in pavement strength. Rehabilitation improvements required to restore the pavement to pre.:.construction
condition and strength shall be proposed by the applicant. The results shall be documented in a report and submitted to the Town for review and approval. The Applicant shall be responsible
for completing any required road repairs prior to release of the occupancy permit. 67. EROSION CONTROL. Interim and final erosion control plans shall be prepared and submitted to the
Engineering Division of the Parks & Public Works Department. A maximum of two weeks is allowed between clearing of an area and stabilizinglbuilding on an area if grading is allowed during
the rainy season. Interim erosion control measures, to be carried out during construction and before installation of the final landscaping shall be included. Interim erosion control
method shall include, but are not limited to: silt fences, fiber rolls (with locations and details), erosion control blankets, Town standard seeding specification, filter berms, check
dams, retention basins, etc. Provide erosion control measures as needed to protect downstream water quality duringwinter months. The grading, drainage, erosion control plans and SWPPP
shall be in compliance with applicable measures contained in the amended provisions C.3 and C.14 of Order 01-024 of the amended Santa Clara County NPDES Permit. 19
68. SITE DRAlNAGE. Stormwater detention facilities shall be provided to insure that post project runoff is less than or equal to pre-development rates. 69. STORM DRAINAGE OUTFALL. The
drainage outfall shall be televised prior to the architecture and site submittal, to verify that the existing facilities are in an acceptable physical condition. The videotape shall
be submitted to the Town Engineer for review and approval. In the event that the facility is unacceptable, the architecture and site plans shall reflect the proposed improvements needed
to rehabilitate the outfall condition. 70. NONPOlNT SOURCE POLLUTION PREVENTION. On-site drainage systems shall include a filtration devices such as bio-swales and mechanical filters
(i.e. Storm Septor) placed upstream of the site discharge point. 71. Sll...T AND MUD IN PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY. It is the responsibility of contractor and home owner to make sure that all
dirt tracked into the public right-of-way is cleaned up on a daily basis. Mud, silt, concrete and other construction debris SHALL NOT be washed into the Town's storm drains. 72. UTILITIES.
The developer shall install all utility services, including telephone, electric power and all other communications lines underground, as required by Town Code §27.50.015(b). All new
utility services shall be placed underground. 73. RESTORATION OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS. The developer shall repair or replace all existing improvements not designated for removal that
are damaged or removed because of developer's operations. Improvements such as, but not limited t,o: curbs, gutters, sidewalks, driveways, signs, pavements, raised pavement markers,
thermoplastic pavement markings, etc. shall be repaired and replaced to a condition equal to or better than the 'original condition. Existing improvement to be repaired or replaced shall
be at the direction of the 20
Engineering Construction Inspector, and shall comply with all Title 24 Disabled Access provisions. Developer shall request a walk-through with the Engineering Construction Inspector
before the start of construction to verify existing conditions. 74. CURB AND GUTTER. The developer shall repair and replace to existing Town standards any curb and gutter damaged now
or during construction of this project. New curb and gutter shall be constructed per Town Standard Details. The limits of curb and gutter repair will be determined by the Engineering
Construction Inspector during construction of the project. 75. DESIGN CHANGES. The Applicant's registered Engineer shall notify the Town Engineer, in writing, at least 72 hours in advance
of all differences between the proposed work and the design indicated on the plans. Any proposed changes shall be subject to the approval of the Town before altered work is started.
Any approved changes shall be incorporated into the final" as-built" drawings. 76. AS-BUILT PLANS. After After completion of the construction of all work, the original plans shall have
all changes (change orders and field changes) clearly marked. The"as-built" plans shall again be signed and "wet-stamped" by the civil engineer who prepared the plans, attesting to the
changes. The original "as-built" plans shall be review and approved the Engineering Inspector. A Mylar and AutoCAD disk of the approved "as-built" plans shall be provided to the Town
before the Faithful Performance Security or Occupancy Permit is released. The AutoCAD file shall include only the following information and shall conform to the layer naming convention:
a) Building Outline, Layer: BLDG-OUTLlNE; b) Driveway, Layer: DRNEWAY; c) Retaining Wall, Layer: RETAlNlNG WALL; d) Swimming Pool, Layer: SWllvIMlNG-POOL; e) Tennis Court, Layer: TENNIS-COURT;
f) Property Line, Layer: PROPERTY g) Contours, Layer: NEWCONTOUR. All as-built digital files 21
must be on the same coordinate basis as the Town's survey control network and shall be submitted in AutoCAD version 2000 or higher. 77. SANITARY SEWER LATERAL. Sanitary sewer laterals
are televised by West Valley Sanitation District and approved by the Town of Los Gatos before they are used or reused. Install a sanitary sewer lateral clean-out at the property line.
78. GREASE TRAPS. Meet all requirement of the Santa Clara County Health Department and West
Valley Sanitation District for the interception, separation or pretreatment of effluent. 79. CONSTRUCTIONNOISE. Between the hours of7:00 a.m. to 8:00p.m., weekdays and 9:00 a.m. to 7:00
p.m. weekends and holidays, construction, alteration orrepairactivit1es Sh2.:l1 he allowed. The Building Official mayrestrict construction activities betwreen 7:00 am and 8:00 am weekdays.
No individual piece of equipment shaH produce a noise level exceeding eighty-five (85) dBA at twenty-five (25) feet. If the device is located within a structure on the property, the
measurement shall be made at distances as close to twenty-five (25) feet from the device as possible. The noise level at any point outside of the property plane shall not exceed eighty-five
(85) dBA. The Building Official and Town Engineer may allow modified construction hours for special activities. 80. SITE SECURITY. Prior to commencement of any site work or the introduction
of any earth moving equipment or building materials 0.1111:0 the sHe, the applk;i!l.lJ1lt':Suaill iiDlsure that a temporary fence constructed of materials and located to the satisfaction
of the Director of Community Development has been constructed. This fence shall be in place as approved until the Director of Community Development shall allow it to be removed or changed.
The fence may only be expanded or contracted in size upon approval of the Director of Community Development. Failure to adhere to this condition of approval shall result in the 22
permit being brought to the Planning Commission for its rev.iew and introduction of stricter site and building construction regulations. 81. PRECONSTRUCTION MEETING. Prior-to issuance
of any permit or the commencement of any site work, the general contractor shall: a. Along with the project applicant, attend a pre-construction meeting with the Town Engineer to discuss
the project conditions of approval, working hours, site maintenance and other construction matters; b. Acknowledge in writing that they have read and understand the project conditions
of approval, and will make certain that all project sub-contractors have read and understand them prior to commencing work and that a copy of the project conditions of approval will
be posted on site at all times during construction 82. EARTH MOVEMENT PLAN. Prior to issuance of a Grading Permit, the applicant shall develop an earth movement and management program
under the supervision of a licensed.. soils engineer fOf review and approval by the Engineering Division of the Department of Parks and Public Works. 83. CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT PLAN.
The Applicant shall submit a construction management plan that shall incorporate at a minimum the Earth Movement Plan, Traffic Control. Plan, Project Schedule, site security fencing,
employee parking, construction staging area, construction trailer, and proposed outhouse locations. The Traffic Control Plan shall require that construction traffic use the main driveway
at WinchesterlSR85 on ramp. Construction traffic shall not be allowed on A Street without the express approval of the Town Engineer. 84. COVERED TRUCKS. All trucks transporting materials
from the site shall be covered. 23
86. 85. GOOD HOUSEKEEPING. Good housekeeping practices· shall be observed at all times during the course of construction. Superintendence of construction shall be diligently performed
by a person or persons authorized to do so at all tirnes during working hours. The storing of goods and/or materials on the sidewalk and/or the street will not be allowed unless a special
permit is issued by the Engineering Division. SITE SUPERVISION. The General Contractor shall provide qualified 87. supervision on the job site at all times during construction. CONSTRUCTION
TRAFFIC CONTROL. The Applicant shall prepare a traffic control plan for incorporation into the bid documents. The plan shall be submitted with the grading permit
application and is subject to the review and approval of the Town Engineer. Parks Division 88. GENERAL. All existing and newly planted trees, except those identified for removal, are
specific subjects of approval of this project and shall remain on the site. 89. TREE REPLACEMENT. Replacement trees of a size and number adequate to mitigate the loss of existing mature
trees shall be planted on the project site. The new trees shall be included on the comprehensive landscape plan to be reviewed as part of the Architecture & Site approval process. 90.
NEW TREES. Newly planted and relocated trees shall be double-staked, using rubber tree ties and shall be planted prior to acceptance of the subdivision or architecture and site approval
as determined by the Parks & Forestry Superintendent. 24
91. IRRIGATION. All newly planted landscaping shall be irrigated by an in-ground irrigation system. Special care shall be takento avoid irrigation which will endanger existing native
trees and shrubs. 92. WATER EFFICIENCY. This project is subject to the Town's Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance, Chapter 26, Article IV of the Town Code. A fee of $472 shall be paid
when the landscape, irrigation plans and water calculations are submitted for review. 93. TREE PROTECTION FENCING. Tree protection fencing shall be placed at the drip lines of existing
trees to be retained in the areas of construction. Fencing shall be four foot high chain link attached to steel poles driven two feet into the ground when at the dripline of a tree.
If the fencing is within eight feet of the trunk of a tree, a fence base may be used, as is typical in a chain link fence is rented. TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE SANTA CLARA COUNTY FIRE
DEPARTMENT: 94. HOSE VALVES/STANDPIPES. Buildings that are three or more stories in height or where emergency access has been deemed minimal shall be equipped with standpipes designed
per NFPA Standard #14, and shall be equipped with 2Yz inch hose valves. The locations ofthe 2Yz hose valves may be determined prior to development of the fire sprinkler plan. The existing
Fire Department connection shall be replaced with a device similar or equal to Potter Roemer Model 5776, four way, individually clappered connection. Domestic water shall not be fed
from the fire service line. 95. REQUlRED FIRE FLOW. Required fire flow is 5,750 GPM at 20 psi. residual pressure: The applicant shall present a plan for fire flow and travel distance
mitigation for Fire Department approval prior to issuance of building permits. 25
96. AUTOMATICFIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM. Buildings requiring a fire flow in excess of 2,000 GPM shall be equipped with an approved automatic fire sprinkler system, hydraulically designed
per National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) Standards #13. 97. FINAL REQUIRED FIRE FLOW. Required fire flow may be reduced up to 50% in buildings equipped with automatic fire sprinkler
systems, but can be no less that 1500 GPM. Therefore, the final required fire flow of 2,875 GPM at 20 psi residual pressure shall be available from any two hydrants on or near the site,
provided that they have a maximum spacing of 250 feet. 98. PRIVATE FIRE HYDRANTS. Provide fire hydrants at locatiohs to be determined by the Fire Department. Maximum hydrant spacing
shall be 250 feet with a minimum single flow of 1,500 gallons per minute at 20 psi. residual pressure. Prior to design, the project civil engineer shall meet with the Fire Department
water supply officer to jointly spot the required fire hydrant location. 99. FIRE HYDRANT LOCATION IDENTIFIER. Prior to final inspection, a "blue" dot shall be placed in the roadway
near each fire hydrant, as directed by the Fire Department. 100. FIRELANE MARKING REQUIRED. Provide marking for all roadways within the project. Markings shall be per fire department
specifications. Installation shall also conform to Local Government Standards and Fire Department Standard Details & Specifications A-6. 101. FIRE DEPARTMENT KEY BOX. The buildings shall
be equipped with a permanently installed emergency access key lock box (knox) conforming to Fire Department Standard detail and Specification sheet K-1. Access keys shall be provided
to the Fire Department at the time of final inspection. 26
102. FIRE APPARATUS (ENGINE) ACCESS ROADS REQUIRED. Provide access roadways with a paved all weather surface and a minimum width of 20 feet. vertical clearance of 13 feet six inches,
minimum circulating turning radius complying with Truck #5 specifications. Installations shall conform with Fire Department Standard Details and Specifications A-I. 103. EMERGENCY VEHICLE
TURNAROUND. Provide an approved Fire Department engine roadway turnaround as may be required, with a minimum radius complying with Truck #5 specifications. Installations shall conform
with the Fire Department Standard Details and Specification sheet A-I. 104. TIMING OF REQUIRED INSTALLATIONS. The required fire services, fire hydrants and access road installations,
up through the first lift of asphalt, shall bein place. inspected. and accepted by the Fire Department prior to the start of framing. Bulk construction materials shall not be delivered
to the site until the hydrants and roadway have been accepted. Clearance for building permits will not be given until such time as this requirement is addressed by the developer. to
the satisfaction of the Fire Department. During construction, emergency access roads shall be maintained clear and unimpeded. 105. PREMISE IDENTIFICATION. Approved addresses shall be
placed on all new buildings so they are clearly visible and legible from the streets or roads fronting the property. Numbers shall be a minimum of four inches high and shall contrast
with their background, and shall be illuminated for nighttime viewing. 106. INTERIOR COURTYARDS. The applicant shall provide a plan showing complying Fire Department access to interior
courtyards. 27
107. FIRE ACCESS. The applicant shall provide a plan showing alternate compliance to providing fire access to buildings that exceed the 150' travel distance through an alternate method
and matedal application. TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE POLICE CHIEF: .108. SECURITY REVIEW. The applicant shall meet with the Police Department to review the construction plans, and shall
make any recommended design improvements needed for security, crime prevention or safety. A security consultant will be hired at the applicant's expense to assist the Town in the security
review. The consultant will work at the direction of the Town. 109. SECURITYGUARD. A thorough security plan component shall be established between the developer and the Police Department.
During the architecture and site review process the applicant shall work with the Police Department and Security Consultant to develop an overall securityplan to ensure appropriate el
ements are incorporated into the project, and which may include is not not limited to, security cameras, lighting, landscaping, access control and on-site security personnel.
110. GARAGE LIGHTING. Lighting at garage entrances shall fully light the entry area. Interior garage lighting shall be on 24-hours a day. 111. FENCING. There shall be a fence along the
east property line adjacent to the Los Gatos Creek Trail. 112. PATHWAY LIGHTING. Path lights shall be provided along the trail from the Winchester BIvd. entrance to the creek trail.
28
113. CREEK TRAIL LANDSCAPING. Landscaping along the creek trail shall be selected and planted so that it does not provide a place where a person can be concealed. Low shrubs and/or non-dense
trees are recommended in this area. 114. OFFICE PARKING. The applicant shall notify the Police Department of any parking restrictions for the surface space around the office buildings.
29
SECTION VI This Ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the Town Council of the Town of Los Gatos on April 23, 2004, and adopted by the following vote as an ordinance of the
Town of Los Gatos at a meeting of the Town of the Town of Los Gatos on effect 30 days after it is adopted. COUNCIL MEMBERS: AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: SIGNED: MAYOR
OF THE TOWN OF LOS GATOS LOS GATOS, CALIFORNIA ATTEST: CLERK OF THE TOWN OF LOS GATOS LOS GATOS, CALIFORNIA N:\DEV\ORDS\ 143IXI·14350Will-3-04.wpd 30
n LOS GATOS GATEWAY 14300 AND 14350 WINCHESTER BOULEVARD LOS GATOS, CALIFORNIA SOBRATO DEVELOPMENT COMPANIES • PROJECT TEAM • PROJECT INFORMATION • INDEX • OWNER! DEVELOPER SOBRATO DEVELOPMENT
COMPANIES PHONE 408.446.0700 10600 N. DE ANZA BLVD., 1200 FAX 408 . 446 • 0583 CUPERTINO, CA 95014-2031 CONTACT JOHN SHENK ARCHITECT FORM4 ARCHITECTURE PHONE 415 . 775. 8748 126 POST
STREET, 3RD FlOOR FAX 415. ns . 8752 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94108 CONTACT ROBERT GIANNINI, f.JA CIVIL ENGINEER KIER &: WRIGHT PHONE 408.727 . 6665 3350 SCOTT BLVD.. BLDG. 22 FAX 408.727.564\
SAN JOSE. CA 95112 CONTACT GENE GOLOBle, P.E. LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT THE GUZZARDO PARTNERSHIP lNC. PHONE 415. 433 . 4672 836 MONTGOMERY STREET FAX 415 .433 . 5003 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94133
CONTACT PAUL l.£iilEflI NOTE: ALL EXISTING DEVELOPMENT ON THIS SITE WILL BE DEMOLISHED SUMMARY OF SITE AND AREA TABULATIONS ORIGINALLY APPROVED PROJECT CURRENTLY APPROVED PROJECT MODIFIED
PROJECT (THIS APPLICATION) SITE AREA: 534.950 SF 534,950 SF 534.950 SF 12.26 ACRES 12.26 12.26 ACRES 12.26 ACRES OFFiCE I R&D: 266.000 SF 120.000
SF 160.000 SF 53.67-22.4% 29.9% IHOUSiNG: I 135 UNITS I 290 UNITS I 290 UNITS I TOTAL BUILDING sITe COVERAGE SITE COVERAGE SITE COVERAGE OFFICE /R&O 120.030 SF 49.200
SF 54.660 SF HOUSING 57565 SF 100691 SF 100691 SF TOTAL FOOTPRINT AREA 177.595 SF 33.2% 150,091 SF 26.1% 155.751 SF • 29.1% TOTAL OTHER FOOTPRINT: LANOSCAPE (PlANTEO & WALKS) 233.934
SF 43.7% 232.047 SF 43.4% lANOSCAPE (GROUNO FLOOR PATIOS) 13.372 SF 2.5% 13.372 SF 2.5% OPEN CORRIOORS (RESIDENTIAL) 11.696 SF 2.2% 11.696 SF 2.2% lANDSCAPE & HAROSCAPE TOTAL 220.911
SF 41.3% 259.004 SF 48.4% 257.117 SF 46.1% iitiPAVERS) 125.079 SF 62.263 SF 62.263 SF 11.375 SF 43.572 SF 39.799 SF PAVING T & PAVERS 136.454 SF 25.57-125.655 SF 23.5% 122.082 SF 22.6%
TOTAL GE: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% PARKING PROVIDED: AT GRAOE 342 STALLS 252 STALLS 250 STALLS BELOW GRAOE 770 STALLS 579 STALLS 769 STALLS �
� TOTAL 1.112 STALLS 631 STALLS 1.019 STALLS PARKING RATIOS: omCE /R&D (STALLS/l.000 GSF) 902 STALLS 3.13 STALLS/1.000 GSF 396 STALLS 3.30 STALLS/1.000 GSF 580 STALLS 3.50 STALLS/l.000
GSF HOUSING (STALLS/UNIT) 244 STALLS 1.61 STALLS/UNIT 525 STALLS 1.61 STALLS/UNIT 525 STALLS 1.61 STALLS/UNIT TOTAL 1.146 STALLS 921 STALLS 1.065 STALLS SHAREO SPACES 34 90 66 BELOW
MARKET RATE UNITS 27 BMR UNITS 46 BMR UNITS 51 BMR UNITS HOUSING DENSITY: 6.6 UNITS ACRE 19.7 UNITS ACRE 19.5 UNITS ACRE ARCHITECTURAL Al COVER SHEET Al SITE PLAN A3 OmCE BUILDING -RRST
FLOOR PLAN A4 OmcE BUILDING -SECONO FLOOR PLAN A5 omCE BUILDING -THIRO FLOOR PLAN A6 OmCE BUILDING -GARAGE PlANS A7 OmCE BUILDING -ROOF PLAN AS NOT USED I>S NOT USEO Al0 NOT USED All
NOT USEO A12 NOT USED A13 NOT USED A14 SITE SECTIONS A15 omCE BUILDING -EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS A16 omCE BUILDING -WALL SECTIONS A17 OmCE BUILDING -WALL SECTIONS A16 SITE CIRCULATION PlAN
A19 SHADOW STUDY AlO SHADOW STUOY All PHASING PLAN LANDSCAPE L1 LANDSCAPE PlAN L2 TREE DISPOSITION PlAN 1.3 PlANTING PLAN L4 SITE UGHTlNG PLAN L5 CONSTRUCTION DETAILS .u'!...LI. Cl GRAOING
AND unUlY PlAN C2 CML SECTIONS C3 RUN OFF CALCULATIONS C4 EROSION CONTROL NOTES AND DETAILS C5 EROSION CONTROL PlAN C6 BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICE IBUILDING VOLUME 5.663.000 4.625.000 5.150.000
ISITE POPULATION 1.113 912 1.031 NET NEW WEEKDAY TRIPS 2.722 1.666 2.164 NET NEWAM 346 210 260 NET NEW PM 332 206 246 • VICINITY MAP • RECEIVED APR 14 2004 TOWN OF LOS GATOS PLANNING
DIVISiON FORM4 2124 1----------PROJECT SITE COVER SHEET LOS GATOS , CALIFORNIA SOBRATO DEVELOPMENT COMPANIES NORTH E9 LOS GATOS GATEWAY --===-=:;::;:-" L _ liTHE GUZZARDO PARTNERSHIPINC.
Landscape ArchItects· Land Planners I3lIMClIItQomtIryStrHt san FnndtcCl, CA io41:l3 H150433«72 F415C35003 UIPo.tSlrut.3,dFloo, San Francisco. CA 14101 T 415.115.1741 F 04150115.1151
SOBRATO IDEVELOPMENT COMPANIES o
_L_SI_T_E.:..;PLA_N-.>(F_O;..;.R.:..;R;..;.E..:..F;::;cERc.::E:;:,.N:..::.C.:::.E..:..O.:.;.NL::.;Y;..;.":..::.S.::;E:::.E.
:::.LA..;.:.N.:::.D-=.SC.::.;A..;.:.P-=E:..:.A;::;N.:::.D:..::.C.;.:IV..:.:IL:..:D:..:.RA::..:.:.::W..::..IN:;:G::::Sll.----------------------lG) 00RNEWAYTOGAAACEBELQ'I," GPARKlNGSIGNATENTRY
@]EX!STINGJOGC1NGPATH GEXISTlNGADJAC£NTPAAKiNGSPAC£S o EXIS1lNG EDCt OF CREEK o lINE OfGARAGf.: eaow
ROOF I.\EcmllOJ,. UN1T: 6'x'4'XS' (I..il.WlH) @] NEW 9' X 22' p.w.u.a PARJ<ING SPACE PER TOWN STANDARDS SHEET NOTES [2] ENTRYSlcw.GE 0N;CENTPAWlG(REF£RTO
!JJ'IOSCAPEDRAWlNGS) CD COt-ICROESJDtWAlK(REFERlOlANDSCAPEDP.AWlNGS) o STREET UctlT?OSIS (REFER TO lANOSCN'E DRAWINGS) o L.i,NOSCAPE ARFA (REFER TO LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS) 0PRO?ERTYUNE !2JNEW4"WlDESlRIPE
PAlNlEOPARKING o NEW B'-6,· (!.lIN.) X 18'-0· UNTl5T,tU PER TOWN STAmlAAOS [!]NEW9'XIB'ACtESSIBlEPARK1NGSTAll.PERTOVINSTANlWIDS ;.cCESSlBI.£ PAVD.lEm S'fl.lBOL GTRASHENCUhlJRE 11.
Premises Identification: Approved numbers or addresses shall be placed on all buildings in a position as to be plainly visible and legible from the street or road fronting the property.
Numbers shall contrast with their backgrounds. 10.1iming Of Required Roadway Installations: Required access roads (up through the first lift of asphalt) shall be installed and accepted
by the Fire Department prior to the start of construction, ,except that forming of the garage can be competed prior to the installation of the access roads. Bulk combustible materials
shall not be delivered to the site until installation is complete. During construction, emergency access roads shall be maintained clear and unimpeded. 4. Prior to project final inspection,
the general contractor shall ensure that an approved ("Blue Dot") fire hydrant location identifier has been placed in the roadway as directed by the Fire Department. 2. Prior to installation
a copy of the fire department approved underground fire service drawings shall be provided to the San Jose Water Company for record purposes. The underground contractor shall submit
to the Fire Department 3sets of shop drawings designed per NFPA Std. #24, acomplete permit application and applicable fees for review and approval. 9. The buildings shall be equipped
with apermanently installed emergency access key box (Knox) conforming to Fire Department Standard Detail and Specification sheet K-1. At time of final inspection provide access keys
to the Fire Department. 8. Roadways deemed necessary to faciliate emergency vehicle access shall be identified in accordance with Fire Department Standard Details and Specifications
sheet A-6 as well as any Local Government Standards. 5. Installation of private service mains and/or fire hydrants shall conform to NFPA Standard #24 and Fire Department Standard Details
&Specification W-2. If the slipply piping is ""combined" (sprinkler system &hydrants), aU.L. Approved 4-way FDC shall be provided, Aseparate installation permit from the Fire Department
is required. 3. Provide fire hydrant(s) at location(s) to be determined by the Fire Department and San Jose Water Company. Hydrant(s) shall have aminimum single flow of 1,500 GPM at
20 psi residual, with spacing not to exceed 250 feet. Prior to applying for Building Permit. provide civil drawings reflecting all fire hydrants serving the site. All fees to be paid
by the Developer to the Water Company. 7. Installations of required fire service(s) and fire hydrant(s) shall be tested and accepted by the Fire Department prior to the start of framing
or the delivery of bulk combustible materials. Forming for the garage can be completed prior to operation, however. 6. Buildings and parking garages shall be equipped with standpipes
per NFPA standard #14 and 2 hose valves located in stair enclosures. 1. Buildings requiring afire flow in excess of 2,000 GPM shall be protected throughout by an approved, automatic
fire sprinkler system designed per NFPA Standard #13. FIRE DEPARTMENT NOTES: GENERAL NOTES: 1. REFERTO LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS FOR PEDESTRIAN WPJ...'fmAYS, LIGHTING LAYOUT, LANDSCAPING AREA,
AND ACCENT PAVING LAYOUT. 2. REFER TO CIVIL DRAWINGS FOR EXISTING AND PROPOSED SITE GRADING, EXISTING TREES, SITE UTILITIES, PERLIMINARY DRAINAGE PLAN AND FIRE HYDRANT LOCATIONS. 3.
REFER TO LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS FOR LOCATIONS OF BIKE LOCKERS AND BIKE RACKS. 4. PRECISE LOCATIONS FOR UTILITY AND FIRE EQUIPMENT WILL BE DEVELOPED IN CONJUNCTION WITH PUBLIC UTILITIES.
PJ...L SUCH EQUIPMENT WILL BE FULLY SCREENED AND/OR PAINTED IN SUCH AMANNER SO AS TO HIDE AND/OR MINIMIZE VIEWS OF SUCH EQUIPMENT. ...
"-'-- , . ...:...;;.. '- .,:::.-:. L
.... ._._._.. -.::.. --;:." --_._._----\\ \\ .. '.'::::::::::::: . .....................' .. lOS GATOS CREEK ',i SCVWDCReEK MAINTENANCE YARD \\" n FORM4 2124 E8® PROJECT
NORn! TRUE NORTH o SO' 100' 150' SITE PLAN A2 LOS GATOS , CALIFORNIA SOBRATO DEVELOPMENT COMPANIES LOS GATOS GATEWAY liTHE
GUZZARDO PARTNERsHIPIHC. Landsc;ape An:hltects -Land Planners 136h1ontgometySlJeti San Franc:tsc.o,CA9-4133 T4154334l1n H1S4)35003 m 4 126PoJIStr..t,3rdFloor Sin Fnllchco. C;' ,.101
T .. 1 .5 • 77.5 • 87" 6 F 41.5.775.1152 SORRATO IDEVELOPMENT COMPANIES
(j 0--0-@--C,D CD 0 0 CD CD @ @® 30'-0· , 30'-0" 30'-0' I 30'-0' ! 30'-0' , 30'-0' 30'-0" 30'-0" 3(}'-O' , 30'-0· 30'-0' @_____'6_"E___Ic::L=-D=-IN_G_-,-A=-.-=-F.::.I
R.::.S-=-T-=-F.::.LO--O::..:R-=_-P_LA=-=-N=---,--
® KEYNOTES �
� o CWlHG SET IN WOOD DR ALUt.IINUM W1NOONS [2] CLAY "OLE ROOF' GJ COPPER CUTTER AND DOWNS?OUTS o STRUCTlJRAl... stm. COLUIlN o CONCRETE
flOOR SI.AIl I2J UNE OF Roar OVERHOO o POSSlBl.£COREAND CORRIDOR LOCAllON o UJ.'t OF ROOF BELOW , A17 r--------3" GALV. METAL DECKING SET IN STEEL GALV ANGLE FRAME. PRIME AND PAINT ALL
METAL TO MATCH BUILDING ROOF TILE COLOR. S' CMU I,iALL 1,//PLASTER FINISH (COLOR TO MATCH BUILDING ON EXTERIOR). TYP. 1)2" 16 GADECKING. TYP. 1! ElEV· ! I 1,1<:3'
BEARING -'\ 3' SQUARE RAILS. TYP. : . '%" CANE BOLT I,iITH BRACKETS --. -<TYP. AT ALL GATES)
'%' DROP BOLT· I,iITH BRACKETS . <TYP AT ALL GATES) I,iITH RECEIVING HOLE IN CONRETE ([\ TRASH ENCLOSURE SIDE ELE.VATION SLAB V TYP SPREAD FOOTING AT CMU I,iALLS. NOTE,
ALL STEEL MEMBERS TO BE FABRICATED FROM STEEL. GALVANIZED AND PAINTED. ALL EXPOSED METAL TO RECEIvE PRIMER AND 2 COATS PAINT FINISH. 3' GALV. METAL DECKING SET IN STEEL GALV ANGLE FRAME:
PRIME AND PAINT ALL METAL TO MATCH BUILDING ROOF TILE COLOR. S' CMU 'wALL 1,//PLASTER FINISH (COLOR TO MATCH BUILDING ON EXTERIOR) \ . \ \ NOTE: SEE A15 FOR
/ I Ir--" /" oTRASH ENCLOSURE SIDE ELEVATION , Al7 iWElEV. CONCRETE SLABSHEET DRAIN lE' PER 12" MIN MIN GALV. METAL DECKING ABOVE /S' CMU I,iALL I,i/PLASTER .
.' . 6" I,iIDE x 6' HIGH "'+-,. __ c ------•. -"! TYP. 1 /u I 0; ::JCl uo< ... >" oTRASH ENCLOSURE PLAN C)
-'-_..,...---'0
FORM4 2124 SOBRATO IDEVELOPMENT COMPANIES 126POIISlrut,3rdFIoor S.n Fnnc:ltc:o, CAU108 T .15.775.87" F 415.175.1752 liTHE GUZZARDO PARTNERSHIP'NC. Landscape Architects -Land Planners
836Montgomt:ryStre-! s.n Frand_, CA 94133 T-4154334672 LOS GATOS GATEWAY LOS GATOS , CALIFORNIA SOBRATO DEVELOPMENT COMPANIES OFFICE BUILDING -18T FLOOR PLAN A3 16'
32' <lB' ---"
!i , EJ --------1!3-------------8.J -------.. --lB-' ----r:" -..--27,117 GSF . , --8---------8------4ElEV. 30'-0· 30'-0' @, 30'-0· @I30'-0· 30'-0' oIJO'-O· 30'-0· 1Ii ---':]-n-----....,..J?
_._-----13----..---- . ;1.,-. C·4+ -*__ -...--+. ---.. --. .-- _. !,; 1 'i '; ! fltJ\ -\1
1 f.IILjil{: ii : EID'., i : ;. I 1 E;,.., 28,361 GSF : ",:II! , • -sr.,:! §.:'I
2.-'1-_ j1 , . : i . .---J? .-------'-8-- .---
-$-" .. ---.--! IiiI': i . : ! : ! ; IJI l I I , -.--1------....-EJ-,.•••.-__'__--_--..,
.• .._' -..c.--_-.:.-j".,.:,!,: .. 11:,., -0:,--L!'i •.•.r... ,.I.; .••..•. �
�·._..:'.:•,..:!_.,!: :I.,:._,.-".,:-.:.:..8"".-,'."_:.•'--," .•.•..;.•••. ·! ------J------clJ --_. - -__
2'; ---! i j ] NOTE: SEE SHEET FOR EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS
i I CD, 30'-0· o,30'-0· EllY. w
I : [. : I 11: 0----@-_... o �
� ----'0 •....:S....:E..:..C..:..ON..:..D..:...;..;FL'-'O....:O..:..R'-P..:..L..:..A;:...N
CD KEYNOTES o GlAZlNG so IN WOOD OR ALUldlNtAl WINDOWS o ClAYT1lEROOF" CD C.OPPER GUTTER AND
DOWNsPOUTS [}] STRUCTURAl. srm. COLUl.ltl o COHCREJER.OOR·SlAS [i] UNE OF ROOf' OVERHEAD CD POSSIBLE CORE CORRIDOR lOCA.noo o UN(OFROOrBELOW FORM4 2124 SOBRATO IDEVELOPMENT
COMPANIES 126PIIIIStrul,3rclFloor Szn FranclaC:IlI, C,l,U108 T 0415.115.8148 F 0415.175.1152 liTHE GUZZARDO PARTNERSHIP INC. Landscape Architects· Land PlaM8rs a3lihPoont;omwySlntfl.
Sanfrandsc;o,CA5<4133 T0415mo4li72 F"15mSOO3 LOS GATOS GATEWAY LOS GATOS , CALIFORNIA SOBRATO DEVELOPMENT COMPANIES OFFICE BUILDING -2ND FLOOR PLAN A4 CD.ROJECT
n 2 Al7 I 4t ELEV. 30'-0" 30'-0" @I30'-0' JO'-O' 30'-0" o I ELEV. 30'-0' !1£. ;'W 30'-0' f • , .__._-- _. _ ..-8-- ii 24,697 GSF I Jft.
30'-0' CD30'-0' I oI I r i i , ,Ii NOTE: SEE SHEET A15 FOR EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS 1:i I ------i--------+--------_. -l-'--30'-0' @------()
U_I_LO_I_NG---'A...•;....;.T.:..;.HI'-R.:.;.O...;.F.;:.LO.:.;.O.:.;.R---'PLA:::....;;.N---' ,....-------'eD �
� ..,.;.G) KEYNOTES [2] ItfTEGIW.. COLORED I'tASTEIl OVER lolETA/. STUO FRAMING [2] Gl.AZIN·G SET IN WOOD
OR ALUt.lINUM WlNOOWS [2]CLWTIlEROOF 0 STRUClUitlJ..STEElCOl.UMN o CONCRErE R.OOR S1J,B [2] uta: Of ROOF o POSSIBLE
CORE AND CORRIDOR LOC,/.,TIOK o UNECf'ROOF' mow FORM4 2124 SOBRATO IDEVELOPMENT COMPANIES . 12:1 PCl&tSlrut, 3rdFIoor Sap Francisco,
CA U101 T 1 !i • 7 7 , • 8 7 .c I F 415.775.1152 _ THE GUZZARDO PARTNERSHIP'NC. Landscape Architects· Land Planners 134 Monlpntry Slrnt Tl1H334672 F"'1S433500J
LOS GATOS GATEWAY LOS GATOS , CALIFORNIA SOBRATO DEVELOPMENT COMPANIES OFFICE BUILDING -3RD FLOOR PLAN AS LUPROJECT
KEYNOTES [Q B'-S-.(IAIN) X lB'-O' STANDARD UH!Si/U [2] 9'-0' X lB'-O' STANDARO ACCESSIBLE STitt. o CONC.'IDECOLUt./NS· o 6" CONCRETE WHm stOP o 4-WHrJ£PAlNTEDS1RIPE 0CONCREJrCURB [2]
GW,GE ENTRY RAMP [!]lREHCHDl'Wtl o PAlNTED DIRECTIONAL ARROW GACCE5SlBLEPA,Ib{JNGSIGtW>E. @J UN£ or orneE BUILDING RIM G stAIR ACtESS
TO GROUND LEva ABOVE [G]CARAGEROlL-UPGATr GsrCURfTYFENCiNG TRASH ROOM (WITH 1RASH OIUTE TO UPPER FlOORS). -o-·i--- ® =-( <p c;:>
c;:> 0 @rifJ i .. ! t ! -_._--_. _.._-----" .. ---.-_.... --_..".'---.---_..-... --c;:> 0 0 c;:> 0 'Cj) 0 @'f=i \ ! '" , .... . ... ! , i "1 ;r --', • . .
r ! l -........... \ i 'I i �
� --:--'----j®
LOWERLEVELOFFICEBUILDINGGARAGEPLAN
() I '::::1 \ \..........-\ \'. .\... ' ,:::..----"---' ... ;, \ _...../...\ \ :-,-T-.-, \ ., , ... , , , t t 5 ..
;'-;";-:-:1-,; ,--..-,--, ,---;-.'---!r.. -r",..;-7 I ; ij' , I ,_! ',..I _ .•• •__.. \\ c:=::::-J. ...__
.. 1 : t • : .,' •'. -'1'--;-: ,'; ; :: i I; ; I ./ ·..._..._L...c ....'---'
t._l.J'-:..L �
�
FORM4 2124 SOBRATO IDEVELOP,",ENT COMPANIES .. 12.6 PO$15Ir"I, 3rd Floor Sin Funcl,co,
CA14108 T 41 5, 775 , 87 .. a F 415.775,87$2 liTHE GUZZARDO PARTNERSHIP'Nc. Landscape Architects Land Planners 8J6NonI;omOl)'Snot Sin Frandf,co,CAa413:l T415oW4672 F-4154333003 LOS
GATOS GATEWAY LOS GATOS , CALIFORNIA SOBRATO DEVELOPMENT COMPANIES GARAGE PLANS A6 Cr=DPDROJECT NORTH o 30' 80' 90'
I) C) Elf.V. W NOTE: SEE SHEET A15 FOR EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS ,tE<. •.:..:R:.::O-=O.:....F.:..P=
LA:...::N-=-------__® •
KEYNOTES o ROOF AT FlRSi FLOOR aELOW o ROOf AT SECOND FLOOR BELOW o ROOf AT llilRD flOOR BElOW GCLAYl1LEROOr
0COFPERGUTiERANOOOWtlSPOIJTS o IJECfWOC/.l ROOF SCR£EN (PART OF ROOF S'l'SiEt.I) [2j1YPICAl.I.lECIWllCAlUNIT6'X4'XS'(l..tIhH) FORM4 2124 SOBRATO IDEVELOPMENT COMPANIES
\ ... 126PostSlr•• t,3rdFloot SUI CA U10a T 41S. TT! ,a74' F 415.175.87$2. liTHE GUZZARDO PARTNERSHIPIHC. Landscape Archlteets ·Land P1.nnera 838 MolI'tQomerySl1Ml
T41543J.4672 F415433SOO3 LOS GATOS GATEWAY LOS GATOS , CALIFORNIA SOBRATO DEVELOPMENT COMPANIES OFFICE BUILDING -ROOF PLAN A7 LUPROJECT
()/l.IODflEO PROJECT k CURRENTlY APPR PROJECT PROPERTY UNE AT AN ANGLE If PARKING LOT DRIVE AISLE BUILDING AllEVEL 3 iI BUILDING AiLEVEL 2 BUILDING A; LEVEL 1 REF +0'-0" +272'
; ....-.-.. ---, ---'---i( 1 SCALE: 1116'" -1'.{l" .ot 0 0 j i ...-'-_.-:--_...
, i l------L----i I Ii , PHASE TWp GARAGE !:£VEL 1 8 IFIRST : SECOND J -+l-_TH_'R_O .......-:--l STAIR "? .... @>.. @.... .... @J >.. 1"1 ! �
�-_..--; "" UODIRED PROJECi CURREIfTlYAPP':PROJECT @, EJ..@' @, @__ , j "' 'J k k I PHASE ONE GARAGE WEVEl 3 PHASE ONj:: GARAGE l;EVEL 1 .PHASE GARAGE 4EVEL
2 SECOND THIRD : BUlj..olNG A FIRST __ _ --.!.. .. -.!..----C) SITE SECTION SCALE: 1f3T
=1'-0" 2 FORM4 2124 o <l' 8' ,,' SITE SECTIONS A14 LOS GATOS , CALIFORNIA SOBRATO DEVELOPMENT COMPANIES LOS GATOS GATEWAY liTHE
GUZZARDO PARTNERSHIPINC, Landseape Archltecta -Land Planners I36Montgom..,.8trMt Sal Fnnc/K.o,CA10413J T<l15.(3J<lQ2 F<l'S0433SOO3 121 po,lsla.t, 3rdFI1IlH SJn Fune!lclI, CA 1J,110a
T ..( 1 5. 715 • a 7" 8 F 4115. 775.1752 SOBRATO IDEVELOPMENT COMPANIES
n �
� �
�
{).;;;.B.::.;UI=LD:..;.:IN.:..:G:....::B:J...1 ----l@ �
� 0 o •..l:{B:..::.U=ILD:::..:I:..;.:NG=...;B::.t.1--
--.....10 ,cIB..::.;UI..::.LD:..:.:IN.:..:G:....::B:Ll------------.:(1)
IcB.::.:U1=LD:..:.:IN.:.::G:....:.A:L)-------------------------'0 �
�(>....B_UI_LD_IN_,G_,A.;L.) ---'0 .-=-:::._ FORM4 2124 SOBRATO IDEVELOPMENT COMPANIES Form 4 125 POll Slrul, 3rd Floor Su Fnn;hco. CA 94101 T
415. 775 • a 1 •• F 415.775,1752 liTHE GUZZARDO PARTNERSHIP'NC. Landscape Arehilteta -Land Planners 83{1MontgomtryStrMt SIn FrandKo,CAi41l3 F415oW5003 LOS GATOS
GATEWAY LOS GATOS , CALIFORNIA SOBRATO DEVELOPMENT COMPANIES OFFICE BUILDING -EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS A15 :---16' 32' ....
•. f 1 J"-,-,.""'-'---.-,--.--",,..,,----,c.. ..__,__ --_,,_. IIII .
__ �
�.
. ____--__--_
FO RM4 2124 o 4' 8' 12' A16 KEYNOTES [2] um:GAAL COLORED PIASTER OvEn I.tETAL SliJD FRAI.llNG CD GlRING SET
IN WOOD OR WINDOWS o ClAynlE Roar [TICOPI'fRGUl1ERANDDOwIlSPOvrs Q]STRtY.:TUFALS1EELCOlUlAN 0 CONCRrrEnOO?SI.AB o UHE of ROOF (lI.IEI{HOO
0 UNEOF ROOf'B£l..O'If OFFICE BUILDING -WALL SECTIONS LOS GATOS , CALIFORNIA SOBRATO DEVELOPMENT COMPANIES LOS GATOS GATEWAY liTHE GUZZARDO PARTNERSHIP INC.
Architects. Land Planners "'.........." ..... s.n Franekeo. CA SoC133 F«1543J5003 , " 12G Po,' Sirut, :lrd Floor San Franell eo, CA 08 T '" 1
.5 • 1 7 5 • a 7 .( 8 F 415.775.8752 SOBRATO IDEVELOPMENT COMPANIES
.<L ..•.200-..8". (21 r1] '--;"...---{] ..._._.__ .. __,,,,,,",,,,'__._ f
j ...., .•.<."",.--'.;"..•..:.•... ,-"",-.,., -" _ _.7.'.'i ()
-,0
CD SCAlE: 1/4"=1'.(J" FORM4 2124 o 4' B' 1X A17 KEYNOTES [2] INTEGRAlCOLOREO PLASTER CNER "'ETAl: STUD FRAAllNG o GI.AZ1NG SET IN WCOO
OR AlU\Illml.l WtNOOWS o ClAVlll.£ROor o COPPER CUTTfRAND OOW',fS?OlJJS o STRUCT\IR.&.LSTE!lCOLUWI o CONCRriEflOORSlA8 (2] UNE Of ROOF OVERHEAD o POSSl9LE CORE AND CORRIDOR lOCATION
o Ut/E OF ROOf 6El..O"1t OFFICE BUILDING -WALL SECTIONS LOS GATOS , CALIFORNIA SOBRATO DEVELOPMENT COMPANIES LOS GATOS GATEWAY liTHE GUZZARDO PARTNERSHIP INC. landscape Architects •
land PlanneD 83flMontQomefYSlreet SatlFranebc:o.CAII4133 T.(15433 <6672 F4154335003 126 PoatSlrut, 3rdFIoor San CA 1(10. T .. 1 5 • 77.5 . a 7 .. I F .(15.77.5
.1752 SOBRATO IDEVELOPMENT COMPANIES
..----._-.._.--_.:...::..-I! /I , \ \\ _i\-\ _ \ RECREATION BUILDING BIKE f I\\\ t>EOESTRIAtJ T:tAll LINKING FUTIJRE LIGHT RAil STATION
TOTHECREEKTRAIL \\\ \ \ \ ,\\ ..../' \\\\. ii\i J: \i\\ \\\\\ \\\ -.--\\_.,,_----_\i�
� ------------__.. --_.---\--'0-' ..:."
\ - ---.:: :2JT:X! "---' (·;V· \( . jI • 1\ • \( • Y\:::J ('7'\ \ ,) ( : r-=-----_...
\......... ',.-/.'----' -..-/ . ' . \ \ -\' -------\--_.
\ _.. \ ----c:::=--:\-c:::=--:\-\\ \ \ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \. \ \ \ \ \\' \\ \ \ (. \ \\ \ \ \\ 0.... '\ \
\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ i I \ \ 1 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \. \ \ \ 1\ .... -t·· -\.--\\\.\-/\ ...,. ----' ( ) SOBRATO IDEVELOPMENT COMPANIES 'm 4 126 Post Street, 3rd Floor
San Francisco, CA 94108 T 415.775.8748 F 415.775.8752 liTHE GUZZARDO PARTNERSHIP'NC. Landscape Architects oland Planners 836 Monl90mtl')'Streel T4154334572 F.0415413S003
LOS GATOS GATEWAY LOS GATOS, CALIFORNIA SOBRATO DEVELOPMENT COMPANIES SITE CIRCULATION DIAGRAM A18 PO ZONING MODIFICATION #2 PlANNING RESUBMlTTAI... #4 PLANNING RESUBMITTAl#3 PlANNING
RESUBMITTAl. #2 PLANNING RESUBMIlTAl PO ZONING MODIFICATION ARCH&SITE RESUBMrTTAL ARCH 8. SITE SUBMITTAl. 4UI 03.25.03 12.04.03 11.13.03 09.19.03 08.20.03 05.12.03 07.19.02 05.30.02au
--d TGP INC. 03585 120' !
() \\\ 1"."1 I n I I I I I n I I I nil I I I rrn I I I I n I I I I n I I I I n I I I I n I 1"11II"1 II
SCALE: N.T.S. ! \ \ ____---"1"."1 I n I I I I I n I I I nil I I I rrn I I II n II I I n I , lin I I I I n I '"I/IiJ"' �
� __--,----l® SCALE: N,T.S. \ \\ \ \ I n I I I I In, I I n I I II Irrn I I I I n I I 1I n I I I I n I I I I n I I"."',---" \\ \\ \ �
� ------CD FORM4 2124 SOBRATO IDEVELOPMENT COMPANIES , 126 Post Strut, 3rd Floor San Franc:hto, CA 94108 T '15.775.17".
F 415.775.8752 liTHE GUZZARDO PARTNERSHIPINC. Landsc::ape Architects .lolnd Planners SanFnnclseo,CA8oC133 T41S0433A872 F415433SOO3 LOS GATOS GATEWAY LOS GATOS , CALIFORNIA
SOBRATO DEVELOPMENT COMPANIES SHADOW STUDY A19 E9® PROJECT NORTH TRUE TRUE NORTH o 16' 32' A.a'
i' \\\\ \ \"111"1 I n I I 11I nil I n 1II I I rrn I I 1I nil lin I 1lin I I I I n I I".", \ \ �
� 1"111"1 I n I I I I I n I II n 1II I I rrn I I 1I n II I I
nil lin I I lin 11"."[ \
;,..-------.,..----------------0 \\\\ \ \ \ I nil I lin I I I nil 1I I rrn I I lin I 1lin I I I I n I I II n I 1"111"',--------... \\ \
\\ \
o FORM 4 2124 '" EB® PROJECT NORTH lRUE NORTli 16' 32' A20 LOS GATOS , CALIFORNIA SOBRATO DEVELOPMENT COMPANIES SHADOW STUDY LOS GATOS GATEWAY liTHE GUZZARDO
PARTNERSHIPIHC, Landscape Archttecb· Land Planners 136 Montgomtfy StrlIet San FntIdKo, CA 1.(154334612 F.tU.035003 126 PflltStrut,3rdFhll" Sin FnncllcfI, CA '.108 T .( 1 S •
77 S •• 1 .. a F 415.175.1752 SOBRATO IDEVELOPMENT COMPANIES I
-----------CD SCAlE: FORM4 2124 , I SOBRATO IDEVELOPMENT
COMPANIES 128 POll Slr"t. lrd float San Funehca, CA 9.(10e T 0( 1 5 • 17 S • a 7 0( a F 415.775.8152 lilliE GUZZARDO PARTNERSHIPINC. Landscape Arcf1ttects· Land Planners 136 Montgomory
8tne1 SMlFratleiseo,CA&t133 H15-4334612 FoI1S.c.335003 LOS GATOS GATEWAY LOS GATOS • CALIFORNIA SOBRATO DEVELOPMENT COMPANIES CONSTRUCTION PHASING PLAN A21 PROJECT NORTM TRUE HORTH o
50' 100' 150'
_. . UTILITY, AND FIRE ARE TO BE SCREENED WITH LANDSCAPE PLANTING, TYPICAlLY. L ,RIPARIA.N P I I LOS GATOS CREEK \\ '. \\---\-\ FENCE
. . -\,\ \ \. --- - ---------------\ (\ \ ------ \ --ft---------.---------------------\\-..,--..----"--------\1 -._.-\\ -__---------rL\
-\ ____.. I -.5-\\-\ ------�
�------------T \ __ . --'NTRYMONUM'Nis. \ \ \ \ ( \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
\;::-\ \ \ \ OFFICE BU'LD'NG OFFlC' BU'LD,NG \\ \\\\ \\..Q. \ ENHANCED \ ..... . \ \ \ "'f --0 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \. . \
\ \ \ \ \ \\\\\ ..\\\ L SOBRATO IDEVELOPMENT COMPANIES 126 Post Street, 3rd Floor San Francisco. C.A 9410a T 415.775.8748 F 415.775.8752 • THE GUZZARDO PARTNERSHIP'Nc.
l.iIndscape Architects· und SanFro1nC&o,CA941J3 T4154334672 F415433SOO3 LOS GATOS GATEWAY LOS GATOS, CALIFORNIA SOBRATO
DEVELOPMENT COMPANIES SCHEMAl1C LANDSCAPE PLAN L1 PO ZONING MODIFICATION #'l PLANNING RESUBMITTAl #4 PLANNING RESUBMnTAL#3 PLANNING RESUBMlTTAL #2 PLANNING RESUBMITTAl PO ZONING MODIACATION
ARCH &SITE RESUBMITTAL ARCH &SITE SUBMITTAl o 4. b d 03.25.03 12,04.03 11.13.03 09.11:1.03 08.20.03 05.12.03 07.19.02 05.30.02SO' d TGP INC. 03585 12. I
, ._---___ . -:;.::;:::::::::::::---' --------- "",,;-.... /.'-.... ----------_----I -"--(/\" EXISTING TREES TO BE SAVED
SEE TREE SURVEY FOR \ DESCRIPTION AND TREE PROTECTIO \ GUIDELINES. \\E>(1STING OFF-SITE TREES TO BE \o"r---PRoTECTED. SEE TREE SURVEY GUIDELINES. \ \
PREVIOUSLY REMOVED '\ \. \ \ .. \ 0< -----).------XX-X---Oisp'osition L" R -previously removed S -to
be saved T -to be transplanted Tree Number Refer to tree survey by S. P. McClenahan, doted 8-10-00 for tree species _tlnd size. KEY \ cllld:oealad ..i1h .. �
�....lhc<lripliM. N,,:ooil slcrllllJlb:ohan ba llllPilaCl undcrp<M!lTl<"11 neorclll.lIng l... n." cotltn>ctor
Ilhollindudc In IW bid, .. tree pnln1nlllll""-<lfKc of $5,000.00 (rl"& TI>o<nClllll OCUar.<) lOt ptIlnlng, thiMil'>ll. ano nma.al of c.l,lirlll trc= ..n"rt>orl.L
Thl:si5I/1Dddllionlocrryll'lltlsohlWnoobeins ramo_eel "" Ihd elrqwi","" " 9. IobovewuUllCl.llJ'foce ......"
frornQdjac<r.t""""".. " '. �
� ', .. prOCIl,,,,"o"t,,, reploco_nltraea. lin" _iIllle CC1lculalellby Ihe pro' oltlOl'i.1
10 occopled praclk.. " . \1. A!lupplcmentollrrigotlofl prog....... b tK........etIded ot regularln!.."",ls ( •. lh,,,,,tofO\ll" ••
..!JhOct.Jl. lrrll)at' " is to be oppliod Ill .... abcv<lll>e 'drlpll:le' In an amount D"meiCnt 10 svp • \ 1l111lcll'/Cof w<rterlo'
..oct> IIl<:h In trunklllomolo,. .. . ..... rool lk>ptl\s. 13. T...,a Ptu\...:Uotllll1lpa..tions by the
Town Att>on:rl occur ,,1>mcI;,er CO/lStruclion I•• AU IrHs 511011 be ",""ned. mulc:ho:d. and CGblcd
10 .:.comrne<ldOlio) ... the crborn.1 ..,port .... jmprovo :otobllity and su...i.....l of t!>e tren. PrunlnlllhaP be In «Implionc," ..ltIl t/R"foU"";Il9
lndlatr)' :rlcII'I<Sorc1:l: A. MI :Ipeciti""tjon=o 10<' \IIOrkinll on p""lCC'led trees :Il>ah be ...rlUetlllnd odminlst«ed by 0 qll<lUIfe<l art>orist. .
... sl\Qnbc c..... �
� the of I..... ..tnIcturo lind Iteotlh. to the Welletlt
Chcl>lff , 01 the rnt.",o\ionalS<>clcly01 Aft.:"leul\Ufe (WCls,\,) guldell""" fOf'c.l"\l1"",d \ .... be ...tllln"" Iihl:iP apply o. lIulined In Ihe -mGtlst':l
In til.. """ntol l:Ollllkl"i'JI othcrlnstRletion,thc mOll' ptOl..:tiYcconditloru=ha11opply. NO'lE: Tree Praleclion II\llP<'ctiCInsby the Town klicfi:ot
shall accurot lnlol'Y<lls oInol=lhonon=petl't\O"thond=hollfoH""'Juil!"r...ua_e<l;nllfln't3. \ .. \\ _ .. .".,.:::c-"7'-
/.........-\\\--------... \ EXISTING TO BE TRANSPLA (XX-T). ANY FAILE BOX TREE. \\\ IIr bnl1lch"" "to CI'IC1Klntertd
or npec;lt<! tQ bo OI'lCO<Inlff1lll ""ring <:onlItrlIcllDn. 4. PnIte<;tlon Sl<It"ment: Tho Town tOMlIl\ing ArborilJt ""nr,. lhot tho PfOtecl;"'o tn:.. f"nclnqio odolquat"
prior 10 tIlll be9tnllin') III ClIlI:ItrufOliotl. unIOO\1othc1'>rilloapprO¥ed. TREE PROTECTION/PRUNING NOTES 1. Allt....... �
� en",,,, o:onfomonoo with con<litk"" or Jo,ppn>val. Thi.t =hllil OCC.... prior 10 tile removlIl 01 ony , .......
2. Heighborln'l ......... -mongingthtllll".houl<l be Ptolectod fn>mslt""onl ImpofOlo In til<: OOmo monno' "" o.iltlng on-all" I.""" 10 be "'''''0-.:1. • 3. Trot clrip Ion" 0""" aholl
be prot"fOIod with II II' high mesh atl<lcll"1l 10 2 dlo""'t.... aled JIlIlb Ilrt.eflillto the ground to .. ",lniJnlltr'l ","pill III 18" III no.tro«r> Ullin
10 1<101 ,poei.-g. Tha shod ..l\C Fair to Good Fair Good Gooe Fir Good Good F " Fair to Good Fair Fair to Good Fair Fair lo Good G d ;;:;',.c::::. Fair to Good Fair Fair
to Good Fo;r Fair Fair to Good Fair to Good Fir ad Good Fir Fair Fair Fair Fair to Good fair, fair Fair to Good Fair Fair Fair to Good Fair to. Good Fair fair to Good Fair to Good toir
Fair Fair to Good Fair Fair Fair Feir Condition Good Goo Good fair fair fair lo Good fair to Good Fair Foir Fair lo Good Fair Fair to Good Condition fair to Good Fair to Good
Fair lo Good Foir to Good Poo, Pooc P==-t F;r P , Good Good Poor 10 fair Dead Poor to Foir Poor to fair Fair Poor Dead Poor to fair oved lock Walnut· Deodar Cedar Coast Uve Oak California
Pepper Species Cana Island Pine -r.nlirnrnio ..n"..r River Gum Montere C press Deodar Cedor Cono Island Pine Cona Island Pine Hall Oak Red Iranbark Red lronbork Red Ironbark Red Ironbark
Red Ironbark Black Walnut 'Blue Elderberrv Ir" ric ed Ironbark I k W I California Coast Redwood ed Ironbark Incense Cedar Coast Redwood Bradford Pear Coast Redwood Coast
Redwood Golden Rain Tree aost Redwood oost Redwood Blue Elderbe Ja onese La ua( Almond Blackwood Acacia Blackwood kocier Blackwood Acocio oosl Redwood Holl""'ood Ju i er lock Walnut
c.:.asl Redwoad Coast Redwood Cona lslond Pine Black Walnut COOl'll Redwood Block Walnut Block Walnut Coast Redwood Coast Redwood Hollywood Juniper Hollywood Juniper e ron or Red lronbluk
Shomel.Ash Shamel Ash Shamel Ash Shamel Ash Hall wood Juniper 5 oedes Deodar Cedar Deador Cedar Coast Live Oak Coast Redwood Fair t Cona Island Palm F'r Canarv Island Palm F ir S ecies
Condition Island Pine Red Ironbark Hollywood Juniper Blue Elderberry Almond Coosl Redwood Coost Redwood Golden Rain Bradford Peor Coast Redwood Coast Redwood pedes r'<;ot
Coast Live Oak Shamel Ash Co'eoul Hollywood Juniper 5.4, 2.8, 4.8. 8 7,7 6. 6, 6 4,2 6.3 6.9. 7.3 66,5 9,7 6,a 11.2 30.4 4.2,6.0 3.0. 4.5. 6.2 3.7, 5.7 8.0 7.9 7.7 6. 9.5 B.t 104.0 13.1
16.3 18.6 6,5 6,9 11.9 20.3 16.5 13.4 1.3.4 8,6 7.7 12.7, 11.3, 11.2 9.2, 6.4, 6.S Diameter 7,' 10.6 "7.6. 7.8 6.2,5.0, 4.0 RY OF TREES REMOVED PREVIOUSLY 50 51 73 74
75 76 26 29 83 B8 89 70 71 72 ummo of Trees to "be 52 7.7 66 39.1 67 -4.0.7 30 25.9 31 24.8 Tree H Diameter inches 5 21.1 18 4 21 18.1 7 '7 10 10.7 11 7.5 12 6.7 13 13.4 14-9.2 69 18.2
22 18,0 23 12.9 14.1 8.4. 13.B. B.2 15 7.8 16 7.9 62 14.7 63 19.7 32 11.3 34 1"1.3 65 15.5 68 13.6 48 12.6 49 23.9 54 17.2 55 19.5 56 15.5 57 15.5, 15.2 58 3.6 3.0 2.0 2.0 59 2004. 13.8
60 15.1 61 18.0 24 12.6 " C. Trees Removed 9 Tree" Diameter Inches 1 11.9 2 15 4 9.9 35 28.5 36 18.3 39 7.8 40 1 . 42 44 16.7 46 13.4 47 19.6 8. Tronsoiontoble 50ecimens Tree Diameter
lnc:hes 33 37 38 41 53 64 43 45 SUMM 77 78 79 8..0 , 82 l7 19 20 26 '27 ATree I 38 C) PlANNING RESUBMITTAl #4 12.04.03 TGP INC. 03585 .. 8ft '"I d PD ZONING MODIFICATION 05.12.03
ARCH &SITE RESUBMrTTAL 07.19.02 ARCH &SITE SUBMIITAI. 05.30.02 PlANNING RESUBMITTAl #3 11.13.03 PO ZONING MODIFICATION #2 03.25.03 TREE DISPOSITION PLAN L2 LOS GATOS, CALIFORNIA SOBRATO
DEVELOPMENT COMPANIES LOS GATOS GATEWAY PARTNERSHIPINCLandscape Architects· Land Planners 836 MonlgomeryStrt1.'1 San Fr.a!Xi$(o' (A 94133 T41S4334672 F41S4335003
126 Post Street, 3rd Floor San Francisco, CA 94108 T 415775.8748 F 415.775,8752 SOBRATO IDEVELOPMENT COMPANIES IL
i I PLANT LIST \ -------_._-_.•-. \\ \ i PIN CAN .";: BETNIG Shrub ZOne 4 PLAACE,lyp 1--"----Existlng'Trees to Remain, See Tree Disposition Plan. Typ. '.0',; G",n;" QUE lOB
.....-. VVINCHESTER 50UL::VARD ".' __.__ ., _.. ... ;'"';l. .. "1.••-.....-.............r-· \, .-.-.'. '. \\--_...-_._--SHRUB ZONE LEGEND \ Zone 1 Courtyard
Area Planted wI Garden Ornamental -:-...••.__• Zone 2 -Building Perimeter Area Planted 80lh Ornamentc\1 and, Native Species
Tolerant Species . PLAACE TYP. . __ \ -0: ----_.- V ...-_...-......•._. -_-.....-.__zSlZE.l ....T\IIIIf'f IHt.XWll
<,•••," <E"T ....r-""l"f nn,XwD" .... _ 00.:1<..0. e.-_ ---- --__-....' .. ') o
40' 80' ( , I1-.._ SOBRATO IDEVELOPMENT COMPANIES 126 Post Street, 3rd Floor San Francisco, CA 94108 T 415.775.8748 F 415.775.8752 PARTNERSHIP'NC. Landscape
Afdlitects· Land 836 Mot1lgon>ef)'Slreoet SlInFr.ncmo.CA94133 14154)14672 F415433SOO3 LOS GATOS GATEWAY LOS GATOS, CALIFORNIA SOBRATO DEVELOPMENT COMPANIES PLANTING PLAN
L3 PO ZONING MODIFICATION #2 PlANNING RESUBMITTAl #4 PLANNING RESUBMITTAL #3 PlANNING RESUBMITTAL #2 PlANNING RESUBMITTAl PO ZONING MODIFICATION ARCH &SITE RESUBMlTTAl ARCH &SITE SUBMITTAl
03.25.03 12.04.03 11.13.03 09.19.03 0810.03 05.12.03 07.19.02 05.30.02 TGP INC. 03585 12. 1
STREET ft. STRf2ET. A .... __ ·· .... ..;.;........: .:: _.--------.. --_.-._...-.---....--''
':_---,:''7.:0• \\\\\\ ......-.:l:-; ::•..••. . .'(.,. _.. -..... --...-" ._. i".' NOTE· NO TRENCHING FOR WIRE CONDUITS IS TO OCCUR WITHIN TREE PROTECTION
ZONES. POLE LIGHT· PF 191 ON 12' CHARLOTTE POLE BY ELA COMPANY 800.423.6561 BOLLARD LIGHT· TB361 BY HADCO 510.638.3800 BOTH WITH LAMPS THE MEDITERRANEAN LANTERN NITE STAR BY B-K LIGHTING
559.438.5800 WITH ALUMINUM CANOPY FOR TRELLIS MOUNT AND MR-16 LAMP. DOWNLIGHT 126 Post Street, 3rd Floor San Francisco, CA 94108 T 415.775.8748 F 415.775.8752 PLANNING RESUBMITTAl #4
12.04.03 TGP INC. 03585 BO' I 40' d ARCH &SITE RESUBMlTTAI.. 07.19.02 ARCH &SITE SUBMlTIAL PO ZONING MODIFICATION:l2 03.25.03 PlANNINGRESUBMITTAL#3 11.13.03 PLANNING
RESUBMmAL #2 09.19.03 PO ZONING MODIFICATION 05.12.03 L4 LOS GATOS GATEWAY
LOS GATOS, CALIFORNIA SOBRATO DEVELOPMENT COMPANIES SITE LIGHTING PLAN GUZZARDO I a36 Montgome<y Slreet 1 San Fratl(k(o,CA 94133 T41S4334672 F'llS433SOD3
Ii II :. •· •••.•• .f-IIi j••.•.•••. r-------------III I
I IDEVELOPMENT COMPANIES L
NOTES. L Contractor to 5lJbmlt Gomplete shop ArGhl!:ect for re",lel"l prior I:d 2. for
vse In exterior sltvotlons Hhere freeze! thaw cye-Ies ocevr. 3. All const:nJctlOt'l to be welded .steel. 6r1nd all ...w.lds smooth. . 4.
codes and regulations. Keyed occess on exterior-side of gate. 1-------I-Square Tube Steel Pickets GenlereCi on Rolls !-------lIe" Thick Steel Plate 1:0 Pool Side of
6ote. Grlrld all Edges· smooth. center' on Fence ,,' .,---'------::r x TLbe Steel 6ate Frame o -' �
�"F6 r----------9/lfl" Hide by 1-1/4" Deep 5c.ore Joint at " a.c.. or as-ShoHn on DrQHlngs. r-'----------6"x6" HJr.I.M. Center In Pour"",
Hold;3M From All Edges.
Bead Over. Golor to adJaGent Paving. Homex by .Homosote, Trenton. NJ 60Cl.eeS.9900. All Joints . to ·O",.ur @20' D.C.. Max.. at Matarlol Interfac.es.
and as ShoHn on DroHlng=- See Golor Glas5 II Aggregate Bose, Gompacted to at least '10% Sub-grade to at least qQ%
. o Concrete Poving 2" x 2" tube steel lop and bottom roll. Ralls on Post !l'--1---ConGrete Pa....lng ..../6x6. IOXIO HYiF Centered In
Pions. see eclor and Drain Hat o Paving On-structure �
� _ Not. to 5c.ale r-----Drip SGreed !6A"----CompClGl:ed
StIbgr.odo ana Bose per 6eOtec.hrllcol Report. . . .r------Point i"loll to MatGh StUGGo Color 1-1'1-------eM) i"lcl1l HI*t4 Rebar Vertlc.al 0 .24" GI.G. at Genter line of wall and #4
Rebar Horizontal D.C.. TIe Verl:IGal Rebar Into Footing as shoi"ll"l, alternating bands.. Flit all cells full. SwcGO Finish for All Exposed Hall Surfaces. see Golor and Finish
SChedule for tnfonnotlon. POVIng. $ee LO!jout e· ----------dbZTI--------Pre-cast Gcncl"'et.e Hall Cop. 5ee Color and Finish 5che:dule. I ·1II
t.lghll-l6Ight Soli Hix Hc:rterprooflng OrIel ProWGtlon Boord on Floor!> 0'Id Bloc.le. Hdl1 Q!o 5I1oNn. IJ$e c.MJ
Hall !"tJ'#4 R.!lbor Vertical c 24" O.G. al Genter IIrIe of HOli and Rebar-Hot'lzont.al O!o shol-ll'l. Fill oils GI!III5 flJlI. See: eclOl'" and FlnlN1 5aledllle far Bloek.
ond FinlY!. ;2" 1'hIGl:, 6eIat"ch Drain 6oc:rd ,..Ith Filter Filter Fobr'lG. I't"op Fobr'IG. up Hell1s to I" Selol'l Top of Soli. Bottom exit Plonter Drain, Zum ZIOS-c.
ConGrets Topping Slob wllh 6xfl, IOxlO !"lHF Gflntsl"ed In Pour. Slope lo DrolnS or 050 perS'.rll(;.Wral Englnoe<-. \ Line.
S.PD.. SSD. .24" C.G. TIe Into topping" =,lttgj. ond l1oierproOFIr1g (SAO) $e!
') LO!jOUt Pion for AdjOUnt Paving COnditIon. r-------------I'bll c.ep. 506 COlor and r-----4" Dlo. PVc. lrepeGtlon Plp8 at EoGh Planter Drain Exc.ept In LC:II"ln.
Po not GomeGt to Dr"oln. COp Top Cll 5011 Level. Point All Exposed Sw'foces Bloc.K. TGP INC. 03585 PD ZONING MODIFICATION #2 03.25.03 PLANNING RESUBMITIAL #4 12.04.03 PlANNINGRESUBMITIAI...#3
11.13.03 PLANNING RESUBMITTAL#2 09.19.03 PLANNING RESUBMITIAL 08.20.03 PO ZONING MODIFICATION 05.12.03 ARCH &SITe RESUBMITIAL 07.19.02 ARCH &SITE SUBMITTAL 05.30.02 120' ! 4,0' SO' e---o
;;d L5 LOS GATOS GATEWAY LOS GATOS, CALIFORNIA SOBRATO DEVELOPMENT COMPANIES CONSTRUCTION DETAILS liTHE GUZZARDO PARTNERSHIP'NC. Lanc:isalpe Land Planners 83GMolltgomeryStreet
Sin Frand$(O, CA94133 1415"1334572 f4154335OO3 126 Post Street, 3rd Floor San Francisco, CA 94108 T 415.775.8748 F 415.775.8752 SOBRATO IDEVELOPMENT COMPANIES
-_·_--i"t·· ..-EXISTING __. 652-T #1-R l&*r;---JOB NO. AOO034 •(;) • 120 ! !I!Il!!!!!!!! --DW----FS----ss-----R--PROPOSED
ASf'HALT CONC?ETE AGGREGATE BASE BUILDING CATCH BASIN CONCRETE DOMESTIC WA1ER EXISTING FINISH flOOR FlRE GRADE BREAK HIGH P:OINT INVERT IRRIGATION PAVEMENT GRADE RIM ELEVATION
RAIN WATER LEADER STORM DRAJN MANHOLE STORU DRAIN TO? OF CUR6 so AC AS 8LOG C8 CONe GW EX FF FS 08 HP IN... IRR pV RIM Po"SOMH so TC ABBREVIATIONS PO ZONING MODIFlCATlON 2 03.25114
PLANN1NGRESUBMlTIAL#2 09.19.03 . PLANNING RESUBMlTTAl 08.20.03 PO ZONING AMENDMENT 05.12.03. o 40 Scale 1M '" 40 ft EX.
TREE 10 BE TRANSPLANTED EX, TREE TO BE REMOVED SITE SECTIONS WATER METtR iilENCH DRAIN EY.. TREE TO BE SAVEO C1VEHICLE CIRDJLATION \. \ M\ \=," EARTHWORK
QUANTITIES CUT: 36000 -cy FILL: 0 -CY IMPORT: {} -cy EXPORT: 35000 -Cy \l \, \\ .... \ . 'j." \ <i /LEGEND -------"-=-=----===----PROPERTY UNE ADJACENT
PROPERiY UNE BlO SWALE BASEMENT WALL CENTERLINE EASEMENT SPOT GRADE FIRE HYDRANT FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION BACKFLOW PREVENTER (RPP T'rPE) POST INDICATOR VAlVE. (SECTIONAL VALVE) AREA
DRAIN ....,7 CATCH 6ASlN (WI FOSSIL FILlER) .
.. STORM DRAIN WATER DOMESTIC WATtR PRELIMINARY GRADING &UTILITY PLAN LOS GATOS, CALIFORNIA SOBRATO DEVELOPMENT COMPANIES
LOS GATOS GATEWAY , • KlER & WRIGHT CIVIL ENGIII'IRS ! SlllVEYORS, INC. 22 (.;!J;jmw.b 5oolo CJoro,
fAX 126 Post Street, 3rd Floor San Francisco, CA 94108 T 415.7758748 F 415.775.8752 \\ '\ \ \ 1.1\ ' .//\ """= """= " "; ..\1 ' ).
'. :<,:\..U.< =\% \1 .. \ Y \ .../\ \ I ·"A.. \ ' I \ I' \ i \ ,I " !\\ 1.>'\<._.,\ >'\'\1',: :/;.If\ ./\ \\ \{ /1" I ; • \' I, }\ \ ':1:-.
\.,/\' \.\\"\---:-\"\\\ \\ \ \/\ \\ .,n·t\ \ . . i \ \, \\ \ . ", . \,,\,' .:,,/' \ \ \
\ .,..''':. /t,\\ --' \\,n\\"\ \,.\... .. "'\ ' " \: II, _\..\,' ;.
"J. __ __ ;;'" --'-. \.-;" I ><='t I,'. )..< r1 ;, \ \\\
\ ' II I$OBRATO LJDEVELOPMENT COMPANIES II () "-..
---.------275 280 .
275---'--------:--. SECTION A SECTION B HORll. ," .. 20' \JtRT.l" .. S' SECTION C HORIZ.'" _ 20' 'lEliT. to,", S' 280 ---.------",.---.""";;;;;;,.---,,..-----------------28
0 270 -=-:-:c..,...-;,.,,---------------.-.---,,",.--- BUIlDING -rr£2li6:0'--------------....,.-----.---.----"• .:. -----_._--""'-�
�-.,-_ . .._--265 265 __.. __ :· LOT ._________
_l.1.. _ '""'" . 260, 260 SECTION .0 HOOt!. 1" -20' 'fERT. \" .. S· 275 .. 275 ____•• ._.-8IJIU)lIi/(;" • Ff"'Z72
0 265 =-==-- --------..-·,-YNeER(;IlGl;lND··--260 �
� 260 SECTION F HORl2. I" .. 20' VERT. I" .. S' HORIl. 1" .. 20' VERi. 1"-5' -_ -.__._------_._--------_..,.... .._---_ _----------_ _ . 275 ----------------------------------275
.,i I . DEVELOPMENT COMPANIES 126 Post Street, 3rd Floor San Francisco, CA 94108 T 415.7758748 F 415.775.6752 GUZZARDO PARTNERSHIPINC ndsc:ape Architects· Land Plan 1136
MorItgornery'StJeC't T41S<IIl34672 ' KIER & WRIGHT •CIVil WcnURS ! S1llVEYORS, INC. &iB;.; (lre!71i-l6il Sr;1lc
C!(lI>j, ru (4Mji2I{f.41 LOS GATOS GATEWAY LOS GATOS, CALIFORNIA SOBRATO DEVELOPMENT COMPANIES PRELIMINARYCROSSSEcnONS C2 .--------JOB NO_ A00034 PLANNINGRESUBMITTAl#3
11.13.03 PLANNING RESUBMfTTAL It2 09.19.03 PLANNING RESUBMITTAI... 0820.03 PD ZONING AMENOMENT 05.12.03 d b ";"0(.: C-TllB-DRCP. C-SECT USER:","""dlen 1:\<j"'9\AOOO3'l\Pv.NNING\PRC
t.lARCH 2-4. 20(14 12:51 PM
_________HIG_HW_AY_DES_IGN_MA_NU_AL_____ Figure 816.6A Overland Time of Concentration Curves nOon C;;O.S4 L=aoo' 5=0.0\3 Tc:=27 min. e-O.68 L..SOO· 5_0.013 1,.19 min. STORM DISCHARGE
CALCULATIONS I. PERVIOUS/IMPERVIOUS' AREA EXISTING PROPOSED --2: TOTAL AREA: (ACRES) 12.28::1; 12.28::1; 2. TOTAL PERVIOUS AREA: (ACRES) 6.76::1: 4.17± 3. TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA: (ACRES)
5.52± 8.1I± 4• ?o IMPERVIOUS: 45.0 66.1 II. CALCULATIONS RUNOFf' CALCULATIONS: C= RUNOFF COEFFICIENT (WEIGHTED) 1= RAINfALL lNlENSITY A= AREA IN ACRES 1. RUNOFF COEmCIENT: ! I
+] I 0.54 0.66 TOTAL "ACRES I 2-INTENSITY: (IN./HR.) ! I 0.97 "'.25 CONCENTRAnON
) BASED ON WEIGHlED {C} (SEE ABOVE) AND HIGHWAY DESIGN MANUAL (FIG. 816.6A 1987) 3. DISCHARGE: O..C1A (CFS) 6.43 10.44 III. SUMMARY STAlEMENT THE PROJECT POST CONSTRUCTION DISCHARGE
WILL BE EQUAl TO OR .LESS THAN THE PRE CONSTRUCTION DISCHARGE. STATION NO. A.DJUSTED MEAI' A""UAL PRECIPITATION 1918' 1.961
10 l!1i 120 '0 .---MINt/rES 1---. _ @@OURATION :1.2;•. --"':0:.-. ::---.:. L""'" §
19 min. "' :> 1: 1'": ..r w>'I"I:
IU. ow'i="oz :5 27 mln'ffi >o Where: , C "" Runoff Coefficient L = Overland Travel Distance In feet S Cl Slope In ft./ft. To = TIme In minutes 200 40011 800 1000. 8" 1: _ 1.8(1.1-e)(L)1/2
o - TIME OF CONCENTRATION CURVE SJ INTENSITY CURVE --------_._--_._----OO-Srr.: DRAINAGE DETENTION SYSTEM [EX. -=: ==: f=.=:::J Scvv.o OUTFALL JUNCTION
SmUCTURE ON-SHE DRAINAGE UNDERGROUND STORAGE PIPE THE STORAGE VOLUME IS A PRELIMINARY CALCULATION ONLY * INSTALL ORIFICE AT INLET OF EX. 2';" STM. TO UMIT POST-DEVELOPMENT DISCHARGE
TO EOUAL OR LESS THAN PRE-DEVELO?MENT DiSCHARGE. NOT TO SCALE DETENTION SYSTEM NOT TO SCALE JOB NO. A00034 OS.2O.03 05.12.03 09.19.Q3 11.13.03 12.04.Q3 PlANNING RESUBMITIAl
PD ZONING AMENDMENT PlANNING RESUBMITTA1.. #2 PO ZONING MODIFICATION 2 PLANNING RESUBMITTA1.. #4 PLANNING RESUBMITTA1.. #3 RUNOFF CALCULATIONS C3 LOS GATOS GATEWAY LOS GATOS, CALIFORNIA
SOBRATO DEVELOPMENT COMPANIES GUZZARDO PARTNERSHIP'NC scape Architects • land Ranne ..ntnco.CA94133 104154334671 126 Post Street, 3rd Floor
San FrancIsco, CA 94108 T 415.775.8748 F 415.775.8752 DEVELOPMENT COMPANIES OBRATO
EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONJROI MEASIRES' 2. CIVIL ENGINEER: KIER AND WRIGHT. 03350 SCOTT BLVD.. BLDG. 22. SANTA CLARA; CAo 95054. (406) 727-6665. o3. CONSTRUCTION SUPERINltNDENT: TO BE
THIS PLAN IS INTENDED TO BE USED FOR INTERn.! EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL ONLY AND IS NOT TO BE USED FOR fiNAL ELEVATIONS. OR PERl,IANENT IMPRO\1::MENTS. 5. SOUTH
BAY CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR MONlTORING EROSION AND Sf:OlMENT CONTROL MEASURES PRIOR. DURING. AFTER STORl.l EVENTS. 6. REASONABLE CARE SHAll. BE TAKEN WHEN HAULING
ANY EARTH. SAND. GRAVEL STOllE. DEBRIS. OR ANY OTHER SUBSTANCE OVER ANY PUBLIC STREET. ALLEY OR OTHER PUBLIC PLACE. SHOULD ...NY BLOW. SPILL. DR TRACK OVER AND UPON SAID PUBUC OR ADJACENT
PRIVATE PROPERTY. It,lMEDIATE REMEDY SHALL OCCUR. 7. SANITARY fACILITIES SHALL BE MAINTAINED ON THE SITE. B. DURING THE RAINY SEASON. ALL PAVED AREAS SHALL BE KEPT CLEAR Of EARTH MATERIAL
}oND DEBRIS. THE SITE SHALL BE MAINTAINED SO AS TO t.lIN!l.lIZE SEDIMENT LADEN RUNOff' TO ANY STORM DRAINAGE SYSl'EtJ. Itlct.UDINC EXISllNG DRAINAGE SWALES AND WATER COURSES. 9. CONStRUCTION
OPERATION SHALL BE CARRIED OUT IN SUCH A t.lANNER THAT EROSION AND WATER POllUTION WILL BE LlINIMlZED. STATE AND LOCAL LAWS CONC£RNlNG POl.LU1l0N ABATEMENT SHALL BE COM!"LIEO WIlli.
10. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE DUST CONTROL AS REOUIRED BY THE APPROPRIATE FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL AGENCY REQUIREMENTS. 5. IF HYQROS£EDING IS NOT USED OR IS NOT BY
10/10. lliEN OTHER IMMEOIATE M£1'HOOS SHALL BE IMPLEMENltO, SUCH AS EROSION CONTROL BLANKETS, OR A THREE-STEP APPUCATION OF l)SEED, MULCH. FERTILIZER 2)8LOWli STRAW o3)TACl<IFlER AND
MULCH. 6. INLET PROTECTION SHAll BE INSTALLED AT OPEN INLETS TO PREVENT SEDIMENT FROM ENTERING THE STORM DRAIN SYSTEM. INLETS EROSION CONTROL
{'<P.E TO BE LOCliED TO 7. THIS EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN MAY NOT COVER AlL THE SITUATIONS THAT MAY ARISE DURING CONSTRUCTION DUE TO UNANTICIPATED fiLED CONDITIONS. VARIATIONS
AND AND ADDITIONS MAY BE. MADE TO iHIS PLAN IN THE FIElD. NOTIFY lliE CITY REPRESENTATIVE Of ANY nEW CHANGES. THE fACILITIES SHO'M'l ON THIS PLAN ARE DESIGNED TO CONTROl EROSION AND
SE:OIM(NT DURING THE RAINY SEASON, QCTDeER 15 TO APRIL 15. FAClUllE:S ARE TO BE OPERABLE PRIOR TO OCTOBER 1 OF ANY YEAR. CRADINC OPERATIONS DURING THE RAINY S(ASON VMICH LEAVE OENUOEO
SLOPES SHALL BE: PROTECTED Vo1TH EROSION CONTROL MEASURES IMMEDIATELY FOLLOW,NG GRADING ON SLOPES. . 2. THIS PLAN COVERS ONLY THE FlRST 'MNTER fOLLOWING GRADING WITH ASSUMED SITE CONDITIONS
AS SHOWN ON THE EROSlON CONTROl PLAN. PRIOR TO SEPTEMBER 15. THE COMPLETION OF SITE IMPROVD.tENT SHALL BE EVALUATED AND REVISION t.lADE TO THIS PLAN AS NECESSARY THE APPROVAL
OF' THE Cln' ENGINEER. PLANS ARE TO BE RESUaMln'ED FOR orr APPROVAL PRIOR TO SEPTEMBER 1 OF' EACH SUBSEOUENT YEAR UNTIL SITE IMPROVEMENTS ARE: ACCEPTEO BY THE CITY. J. CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES
$HALl BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF GRADING. ALL CONSTRUCTION TRAFAC ENTERING ONTO THE PAVED ROAD MUST CROSS THE STABIUZEO CONSlRUCTlON ENTRANCE WAYS. 4. CONTP.ACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN
STAB1UZED ENlRANCE AT EACH VEHIClE ACCESS POINT TO EXISTING PAVED STREETS. ANY MUD OR DEBRIS TRACKED PU6LIC STREETS SHALL BE REMOVED DAlL't AND AS REQUIRED B)' THE CITY. r.rurRt.!
EROSION AND SflllMENT CONTROl NOIfS' OWNER: SOBRATO DEVELOPMENT COMPANY. 10600 N. DE ANZA. BLVD.. STE 200. CUPERTINO. CALIfORNIA 95014-:!:O75. (4<18) 446"':0700. IT SHALL BE: lliE: CONTRACTOR'S
RESPOUSlBtUTY TO MAINTAIN CONTROL Of THE ENTIRE CONSTRUCTION OPERATION AND TO KEEP THE ENTIRE Silt IN COMPLIANCE V.1TH THE SOIL EROSION PLAN. 2 AE-BARS OR :r x 2' DRIVEN 12" TO 18" INTO
THE GROUND STAKES ARE TO BE ORIVEN FLUSH Wl'Tli THE TO? OF' THE BALES ANCHORING DETAIL NOT TO SCALE STRAW DIKE ENTRENCH BALES A UNDISTURBED Of 4" INTO THE GROUND CROUND
",' VERTICAl FACE ANGLE. FlRST STAKE TOWARD Tl-lE PREVIOUSlY PLACED BALE EXISTING GROUND N.T.S. C4 FILTER FABRIC CATCH BASIN INLET PROTECTION t.lAlNTEN;NC" tlOlFS· PROVIDE APPAOPRIATE
TRANSITION BETWEEN STAB1UZED CONSTRUCTION ENlRANCE AND PUBUC RIGl-lT-Of,...WAY. . MAINTENANCE -THE ENTRANCE SHALL BE MAUnl,lNEO IN A THAT Y<lLL PREVENT TRACKING OR FLOWING
SEDIMENT ONTO PUBLIC RIGHTS-OFWAY. THIS MAY REQUIRE PERIODIC TO? DRESSING WITH ADOITIONAl STONE AS CONDITIONS DEMAND. AND REPAIR AND/OR CLEAN OUT ANY MEASURES USED TO TRAP SEDIMENT.
-AlL SEDIMENT WASHED. OR TRACKED ONTO PUBUC RIGHTS-OF-WAY SHAlL BE REt.lOVED IMMEDIATELY. -WHEN NECESSARY. WHEELS SHAU-BE CLEANED TO REMOVE SEDIMENT
PRIOR TO ENTRANCE: ONTO PUBliC RIGHTS-OF-WAY. THIS SHALL BE DONE AT AN AREA STABIUZE:O WITH CRUSHED STONE. WHICH DRAINS • INTO AN APPROVED SEDIMENT 1?,AP OR SEOIM£NT BASIN. STABILIZED
CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE NOT TO SCALE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY /3 C4 1. MAINTENANCE IS TO BE PERFORMED AS FOLLOWS: A. REPAIr: DAMAGtS CAUSED BY SOIL EROSION OR COtlSTRUC1l0N·AT THE END OF EACH
WORKING O;'Y. B. SWALES SHALL BE INSPECTED P(RIOOICALLY AND MAINTAINED A.S NEEDED. C. SEDIME:NT TRAPS. BERMS. AND SWALES ARE TO BE INSPECTED Af'TER EACH STORM AND REPAIRS MADE AS NEEDED.
D. SEDIMENT SHALL BE REMOVED AND SEDIMENT TRAP RESTORED TO ITS ORIC/NAl DIMENSION \'MEN SEDIMENT HAS ACCUMULATED TO A DEPTH OF 1 FOOT. E. SEDIMENT REMDVED FROM TRAP $HALL BE OEPOSITED
IN A SUITABLE AREA AND IN SUCH A MANNER TIiAT IT WILL NOT ERODE. F. RILL AND GULUES MUST BE REPAIRED. 2. SAND BAG INLET PROTECllON SHALL BE CLEANED OUT WHENEVER SEDIMENT DEPTH IS· ONE
HALF THE HEIGHT OF' ONE: SAND BAC EROSION ANp SEOlIJENT cnNTRQ! NARRATIVE 1. ;::ROSION AND SEOlMENT CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE IMPLEMENTED BY OCTDaER 1ST OF EACH 'fEAR AND MAINTAINEO
THROUGH APRIL 15TH, OR AS DIRECTED BY THE CITY ENGINEER. 2. DURING RAINY SEASON ALL PAVED AREAS SHALL BE KEPT CLEAR Of EARTH MATERIAL AND OEBRIS. THE SIrE SHALL BE MAINTAINED SO AS TO
I.'IINIMIZE SEDIMIENT-LAOEN RUNO'F TO ANY STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEM. SANDBAG SEDIMENT INLET BARRIERS OR OTHER APPROV'i:O BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICeS SHALL BE INSTALLED AT PLACES ANTICIPAllNG
SEOIMEIH-SEOIMEIH-LAQEN RUNOfF TQ A PAVE[) J. ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURE.S, (SILT FENCE. STRAW BALES. INLET PROTECTION. ETC.) MUST BE INSP(CTEO AND REPAIRED AT THE END
Of EACH WORKING DAY DURING THE RAINY SEASON. 4. SILT fENCES SHALL BE CHECKED fOR ACCUI.lULATlON or SEDIMENT AFTER E:.CH SlGNIACANT RAIN-f:'u.. SEOlMENi SHALL BE RElAOVED FROM BEHIND
THE SILT 'MiEN IT HAS ACCUMULA1EO. 5. A'TER EVERY STORM EVENT. SEDIMENT ACCUMULATED BEHIND SANDBAGS ON Al.L PAVEO STREETS SHALL BE REMOVED AND INSPECTED FOR MAINTENANCE
AND REPAIRS. • 6. A STAB1UZED CONSTRUCllON ENTRANCE WAY SHALL 8E INSTALLED PRIOR TO COMMENCWENT OF CFcADING. ALL CONSTRUCTION TRAFFIC ENTERING THE PAVED ROAD MUST CROSS THE STAalLlZ£O
CONSTRUCTION E:NTRANCE WAY. ANY MUD TRACKED ONTO PUBUC STREETS SHALL BE REMOVED THE SALlE DAY AND AS REQUIRED BY THE CITY. MAltlIfNANI":' YfAS!/RES , CONTROLS INSPECTION fREQUENCY MAINTENANCE/REPAIR
MEASURES Stabili<:ed l.Ianthly and After Each RalnfQII CQnstructian £ntratlce Replote gravel mQteriol when voids are present RemQve QII !:lediml!11t d-:posit.e<:l on pave roadways with
24 hours Remove QrQ·,el at compleUon 01 construction Silt Fencing We-ekl)' and Afler Each Roinfqll Repair whenevl:r fen.:e is damaged RemClYe sediment when It reaches 1/3 the height
of the lenee especiany if heovyrains Qre eMpecled Storm Droin Weeki)' and After Each Rainfoll Proteclian Remove octumulated debris Recrode on erOded areas on the berm Sediment
Bos;" Weeki)' ond Alter Eoch Rainfall RemClYll ",hen the sediment storage zone is half full RepoirerosioTlas necessOT)' UnclOQ cuUe: riser Slro.... Bale Dike WeelJ)' and
Mter Eoch Roinfol! RepllJCe slrow boles Ihot have decomposed or WhOM. bind<n9 has broken Remow: sediment behind the barrier when it reaches a depth of 6 inches L:::J JOB NO. A00034 PLANNING
RESUBMITTAl. #3 11.13.03 PO ZONING
PLANNING RESUBMITTAI. #4 12.D4.03 PO ZONING MODIACATION 2 03.25.04 EROSION CONTROL NOTES & DETAILS C4 LOS GATOS, CALIFORNIA SOBRATO DEVELOPMENT COMPANIES LOS GATOS GATEWAY
& WRIGHT • CIVIL nf,IIHRS &SlllVEYORS. INC. I JjjIJ x,II ..I...< 11 (4OOlm·EiOi 1x"loCll!IO, CrJlilc.rniG9)E!A W:{(OS)7li·554i m 4 I ". I .......... , (." . 126 Post
Street , 3rd Floor San Francisco, CA 94108 T 415.775.8748 F 415.775.8752 I··....·..·.. DEVELOPMENT COMPANIES OBRATO
JOB NO. A00034 SYMBOL r, L.J ---120 ! 80 PO ZONING MODIFICATION 2 03.25.G4 PlANNING RESUBMrTTAl..f14 12.04.03 PLANNINGRESUBMITTALII3 11.13.03 PLANNING RESUBMITTAL#2
09.19.03 PLANNING RESUBMITTAL 08.20.03 PO ZONING AMENOMENT OS.12.03 INLET PROTECTION eAS1NjTRENCH DRAIN) DETAIL CALlOUT Scale "" 40 fl PROPERTY ·UN!:: CENTERLINE STRAW
DIKE STABIUZEO ENTRANCE LEGEND DESCRIPTION o 40 C' C5 '-...;--PRELIMINARY EROSION CONTROL PLAN LOS GATOS, CALIFORNIA SOBRATO DEVELOPMENT COMPANIES
CA 94133 1'15<334671 ' KIER & WRIGHT • CIVil ENGIIHRS &SIllVEYORS, 1IIe. 3350S:otl &,ildin9 22 1<>,10 CI.., 9iiI\' fAl(108)11I-iM1
126 Post Street, 3rd Floor San Francisco, CA 94108 T 415.775.8748 F 415.775.8752 DEVELOPMENT COMPANIES .I OBRATO /)/
n LOS GATOS GATEWAY 14300 AND 14350 WINCHESTER BOULEVARD LOS GATOS, CALIFORNIA SOBRATO DEVELOPMENT COMPANIES • PROJECT TEAM • PROJECT INFORMATION • INDEX • OWNER! DEVELOPER SOBRATO DEVELOPMENT
COMPANIES PHONE 408.446.0700 10600 N. DE ANZA BLVD., 1200 FAX 408 . 446 • 0583 CUPERTINO, CA 95014-2031 CONTACT JOHN SHENK ARCHITECT FORM4 ARCHITECTURE PHONE 415 . 775. 8748 126 POST
STREET, 3RD FlOOR FAX 415. ns . 8752 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94108 CONTACT ROBERT GIANNINI, f.JA CIVIL ENGINEER KIER &: WRIGHT PHONE 408.727 . 6665 3350 SCOTT BLVD.. BLDG. 22 FAX 408.727.564\
SAN JOSE. CA 95112 CONTACT GENE GOLOBle, P.E. LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT THE GUZZARDO PARTNERSHIP lNC. PHONE 415. 433 . 4672 836 MONTGOMERY STREET FAX 415 .433 . 5003 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94133
CONTACT PAUL l.£iilEflI NOTE: ALL EXISTING DEVELOPMENT ON THIS SITE WILL BE DEMOLISHED SUMMARY OF SITE AND AREA TABULATIONS ORIGINALLY APPROVED PROJECT CURRENTLY APPROVED PROJECT MODIFIED
PROJECT (THIS APPLICATION) SITE AREA: 534.950 SF 534,950 SF 534.950 SF 12.26 ACRES 12.26 12.26 ACRES 12.26 ACRES OFFiCE I R&D: 266.000 SF 120.000
SF 160.000 SF 53.67-22.4% 29.9% IHOUSiNG: I 135 UNITS I 290 UNITS I 290 UNITS I TOTAL BUILDING sITe COVERAGE SITE COVERAGE SITE COVERAGE OFFICE /R&O 120.030 SF 49.200
SF 54.660 SF HOUSING 57565 SF 100691 SF 100691 SF TOTAL FOOTPRINT AREA 177.595 SF 33.2% 150,091 SF 26.1% 155.751 SF • 29.1% TOTAL OTHER FOOTPRINT: LANOSCAPE (PlANTEO & WALKS) 233.934
SF 43.7% 232.047 SF 43.4% lANOSCAPE (GROUNO FLOOR PATIOS) 13.372 SF 2.5% 13.372 SF 2.5% OPEN CORRIOORS (RESIDENTIAL) 11.696 SF 2.2% 11.696 SF 2.2% lANDSCAPE & HAROSCAPE TOTAL 220.911
SF 41.3% 259.004 SF 48.4% 257.117 SF 46.1% 125.079 SF 62.263 SF 62.263 SF INTERLOCKING PAVERS) 11.375 SF 43.572 SF 39.799 SF TOTAL
ASPHALT & PAVERS 136.454 SF 25.57-125.655 SF 23.5% 122.082 SF 22.6% TOTAL SITE COVERAGE: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% PARKING PROVIDED: AT GRAOE 342 STALLS 252 STALLS 250 STALLS BELOW GRAOE
770 STALLS 579 STALLS 769 STALLS TOTAL 1.112 STALLS 631 STALLS 1.019 STALLS PARKING RATIOS: omCE /R&D (STALLS/l.000 GSF)
902 STALLS 3.13 STALLS/1.000 GSF 396 STALLS 3.30 STALLS/1.000 GSF 580 STALLS 3.50 STALLS/l.000 GSF HOUSING (STALLS/UNIT) 244 STALLS 1.61 STALLS/UNIT 525 STALLS 1.61 STALLS/UNIT 525 STALLS
1.61 STAllS/UNIT TOTAL 1.146 STAllS 921 STALLS 1.065 STALLS SHAREO SPACES 34 90 66 BELOW MARKET RATE UNITS 27 BMR UNITS 46 BMR UNITS 51 BMR UNITS HOUSING DENSITY: 6.6 UNITS ACRE 19.7
UNITS ACRE 19.5 UNITS ACRE ARCHITECTURAL Al COVER SHEET Al SITE PLAN A3 OmCE BUILDING -RRST FLOOR PLAN A4 OmcE BUILDING -SECONO FLOOR PLAN AS omCE BUILDING -THIRO FLOOR PLAN A6 OmCE
BUILDING -GARAGE PlANS A7 OmCE BUILDING -ROOF PLAN AS NOT USED AS NOT USEO Al0 NOT USED All NOT USEO A12 NOT USED A13 NOT USED A14 SITE SECTIONS A15 omCE BUILDING -EXTERIOR ElEVATIONS
A16 omCE BUILDING -WALL SECTIONS A17 OmCE BUILDING -WALL SECTIONS A16 SITE CIRCULATION PlAN A19 SHADOW STUDY AlO SHADOW STUOY All PHASING PLAN LANDSCAPE 11 LANDSCAPE PlAN l2 TREE DISPOSITION
PlAN 1.3 PlANTING PLAN L4 SITE UGHTlNG PLAN L5 CONSTRUCTION DETAILS .u'!...LI. Cl GRAOING AND unUlY PlAN C2 CML SECTIONS C3 RUN OFF CALCULATIONS C4 EROSION CONTROL NOTES AND DETAILS
C5 EROSION CONTROL PlAN C6 BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICE IBUILDING VOLUME 5.663.000 4.625.000 5.150.000 ISITE POPULATION 1.113 912 1.031 NET NEW WEEKDAY TRIPS 2.722 1.666 2.164 NET NEWAM
346 210 260 NET NEW PM 332 206 246 • VICINITY MAP • RECEIVED APR 14 2004 TOWN OF LOS GATOS PLANNING DIVISiON FORM4 2124 1----------PROJECT SITE COVER SHEET LOS GATOS , CALIFORNIA SOBRATO
DEVELOPMENT COMPANIES LOS GATOS GATEWAY -_-====,-'1 L _ liTHE GUZZARDO PARTNERSHIPINC. Landscape ArchItects· Land Planners I3lIMClIItQomtIryStrHt san FnndtcCl, CA io41:l3 H150433«72
F415C35003 UIPo.tSlrut.3,dFloo, San Francisco. CA 14101 T 415.115.1741 F 04150115.1151 SOBRATO IDEVELOPMENT COMPANIES o
0DRNEWAYTOGAAACEBELQ'I," GPARKlNGSIGNATENTRY @]EX!5lINGJOGC1NGPATH GEXI5lINGAOJACOOPAAKiNGSPAC£S o EXIS1lNG EDCt OF CREEK o lINE OfGARAGf.:
eaow ROOF MEcmllOJ. UNll: 6'x'4'XS' (lilWlH) @] NEVI 9' X 22' p.w.u.a PARJ<ING SPACE PER
TOWN STANDARDS SHEET NOTES [2] ENTRYSlcw.GE 0N;CENTPAWlG(REF£RTO!JJ'IOSCAPEDRAWlNGS) CD COt-ICROESJDtWAlK(REFERlOlANDSCAPEDP.AWlNGS) o STREET UctlT?OSIS (REFER TO lANOSCN'E DRAWINGS)
o L.i,NOSCAPE ARFA (REFER TO LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS) 0PRO?ERTYUNE !2JNEW4"WlDESlRIPEPAlNlEOPARKING o NEW B'-6,· (!.lIN.) X 18'-0' UNTl5T,tU PER TOWN STAmlAADS [!]NEW9'XIB'ACtESSIBlEPARK1NGSTAll.PERTOVINS
TANlWIDS ;.cCESSlBl.£ PAVD.lEm S'fl.lBOL GTRASHENCUhlJRE 11. Premises Identification: Approved numbers or addresses shall be placed on all buildings in a position as to be plainly
visible and legible from the street or road fronting the properly. Numbers shall contrast with their backgrounds. 10.1iming Of Required Roadway Installations: Required access roads (up
through the first lift of asphalt) shall be installed and accepted by the Fire Department prior to the start of construction, ,except that forming of the garage can be competed prior
to the installation of the access roads. Bulk combustible materials shall not be delivered to the site until installation is complete. During construction, emergency access roads shall
be maintained clear and unimpeded. 4. Prior to project final inspection, the general contractor shall ensure that an approved ("Blue Dot") fire hydrant location identifier has been placed
in the roadway as directed by the Fire Department. 2. Prior to installation a copy of the fire department approved underground fire service drawings shall be provided to the San Jose
Water Company for record purposes. The underground contractor shall submit to the Fire Department 3sets of shop drawings designed per NFPA Std. #24, acomplete permit application and
applicable fees for review and approval. 9. The buildings shall be equipped with apermanently installed emergency access key box (Knox) conforming to Fire Department Standard Detail
and Specification sheet K-1. At time of final inspection provide access keys to the Fire Department. 5. Installation of private service mains and/or fire hydrants shall conform to NFPA
Standard #24 and Fire Department Standard Details &Specification W-2. If the slipply piping is "combined" (sprinkler system &hydrants), aU.L. Approved 4-way FDC shall be provided, Aseparate
installation permit from the Fire Department is required. FIRE DEPARTMENT NOTES: 8. Roadways deemed necessary to faciliate emergency vehicle access shall be identified in accordance
with Fire Department Standard Details and Specifications sheet A-6 as well as any Local Govemment Standards. 6. Buildings and parking garages
shall be equipped with standpipes per NFPA standard #14 and 2 hose valves located in stair enclosures. 1. Buildings requiring afire flow in excess of 2,000 GPM shall be protected
throughout by an approved, automatic fire sprinkler system designed per NFPA Standard #13. 7. Installations of required fire service(s) and fire hydrant(s) shall be tested and accepted
by the Fire Department prior to the start of framing or the delivery of bulk combustible materials. Forming for the garage can be completed prior to operation, however. 3. Provide fire
hydrant(s) at location(s) to be determined by the Fire Department and San Jose Water Company. Hydrant(s) shall have aminimum single flow of 1,500 GPM at 20 psi residual, with spacing
not to exceed 250 feet. Prior to applying for Building Permit. provide civil drawings reflecting all fire hydrants serving the site. All fees to be paid by the Developer to the Water
Company. GENERAL NOTES: 1. REFERTO LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS FOR PEDESTRIAN WPJ...'fmAYS, LIGHTING LAYOUT, LANDSCAPING AREA, AND ACCENT PAVING LAYOUT. 2. REFER TO CIVIL DRAWINGS FOR EXISTING
AND PROPOSED SITE GRADING, EXISTING TREES, SITE UTILITIES, PERLIMINARY DRAINAGE PLAN AND FIRE HYDRANT LOCATIONS. 3. REFER TO LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS FOR LOCATIONS OF BIKE LOCKERS AND BIKE
RACKS. 4. PRECISE LOCATIONS FOR UTILITY AND FIRE EQUIPMENT WILL BE DEVELOPED IN CONJUNCTION WITH PUBLIC UTILITIES. PJ...L SUCH EQUIPMENT WILL BE FULLY SCREENED AND/OR PAINTED IN SUCH
AMANNER SO AS TO HIDE AND/OR MINIMIZE VIEWS OF SUCH EQUIPMENT. ... "
-'-- , . ...:...;;.. '- .,:::.-:. L .... ._._._.. -.::.. --;:." --_._._----\\ \\ lOS GATOS CREEK ',i SCVWDCReEK
MAINTENANCE YARD \\"
•..:.S.::.E=-E�
� ------------------.JG) n FORM4 2124 SORRATO IDEVELOPMENT COMPANIES 126PoJIStr..t,3rdFloor Sin Fnllchco. C;' ,.101 T
.. 1 .5 • 77.5 • 87" 6 F 41.5.775.1152 liTHE GUZZARDO PARTNERsHIPIHC. Landsc;ape An:hltects -Land Planners 136h1ontgometySlJeti San Franc:tsc.o,CA9-4133 T4154334l1n H1S4)35003 LOS GATOS
GATEWAY LOS GATOS , CALIFORNIA SOBRATO DEVELOPMENT COMPANIES SITE PLAN A2 E8® PROJECT NORn! TRUE NORTH o 50' 100' 150'
(j CD CD 0 0 CD CD @ @® I 30'-0· I 30'-0" 30'-0' I 30'-0' ! 30'-0' I 30'-0' 30'-0" 30'-0" 3(}'-O' , 30'-0· 30'-0' @__�
� ..,....-�
�•....:F..:.:IR..:.:S:...;T'-'-F..::LO.:.O.:.R;..:..;...PLA:::...;:.N.:...----.,..----------------'G) ®
KEYNOTES o CWlHG SET IN WOOD DR ALUt.IINUM W1NOONS [2] CLAY "OLE ROOF' GJ COPPER CUTTER
AND DOWNS?OUTS o STRUCTlJRAl... stm. COLUIlN o CONCRETE flOOR SI.AIl I2J UNE OF Roar OVERHOO o POSSlBl.£COREAND CORRIDOR LOCAllON o UJ.'t OF ROOF BELOW , A17 r--------3" GALV. METAL
DECKING SET IN STEEL GALV ANGLE FRAME. PRIME AND PAINT ALL METAL TO MATCH BUILDING ROOF TILE COLOR. S' CMU I,iALL 1,//PLASTER FINISH (COLOR TO MATCH BUILDING ON EXTERIOR). TYP.
1)2" 16 GADECKING. TYP. 1! ElEV· iIlfr------ BEARING 3' SQUARE RAILS.
TYP. ! I . , : . '%" CANE BOLT I,iITH BRACKETS , .•• ", ,- -, -" -<TYP. AT ALL GATES) "'--'-... '%' DROP BOLT·I,iITH BRACKETS . \.... <TYP AT ALL GATES) I,iITH RECEIVING
HOLE IN CONRETE ([\ TRASH ENCLOSURE SIDE ELE.VATION SLAB V TYP SPREAD FOOTING AT CMU I,iALLS. NOTE, ALL STEEL MEMBERS TO BE FABRICATED FROM STEEL. GALVANIZED AND PAINTED. ALL EXPOSED
METAL TO RECEIvE PRIMER AND 2 COATS PAINT FINISH. 3' GALV. METAL DECKING SET IN STEEL GALV ANGLE FRAME: PRIME AND PAINT ALL METAL TO MATCH BUILDING ROOF TILE COLOR. S' CMU 'wALL 1,//PLASTER
FINISH (COLOR TO MATCH BUILDING ON EXTERIOR) \ . \ \ NOTE: SEE A15 FOR / I Ir-" /" oTRASH ENCLOSURE SIDE ELEVATION , Al7 Al7 iWElEV.
CONCRETE SLABSHEET DRAIN lE' PER 12" MIN GALV. METAL DECKING ABOVE /S' CMU I,iALL I,i/PLASTER . .' . 6" I,iIDE x 6' HIGH "'+-,. __ c --.--_•.
-"! TYP. 1 /: u I 0; ::JCl uo< ... >" oTRASH ENCLOSURE PLAN C) �
� -'------------------------------'0 FORM4 2124 SOBRATO IDEVELOPMENT COMPANIES 126POIISlrut,3rdFIoor
S.n Fnnc:ltc:o, CAU108 T .15.775.87" F 415.175.1752 liTHE GUZZARDO PARTNERSHIP'NC. Landscape Architects -Land Planners 836Montgomt:ryStre-! s.n Frand_, CA 94133 T-4154334672
LOS GATOS GATEWAY LOS GATOS , CALIFORNIA SOBRATO DEVELOPMENT COMPANIES OFFICE BUILDING -18T FLOOR PLAN A3 16' 32' <lB'
EllY. 4EllY. 30'-0' 30'-0' @, 30'-0' @I30'-0' 30'-0" EllY. W oI i -._--GJ ----JO'-O' 30'-0" CD, 30'-0' o,30'-0' ; .,-.. 13·· ---13---...._----s--···-.
1/'r----_. ,_._-1 1.,.-1 '1 • ST'IR ,I .._ j 28,361 GSF ' ,\' EElf J...S;;"5-,, I ' , ,J ! clio '} . �
� --8--------13)..",,;-.---.. __,Ei---------13 ..----- -----13---" I I, I', ; j ! ; a: J j ! .i
I : [, : I 11: 0-----'\r---ii!':"':" @--_ .. o
----J0 _SE_C_O_N_D_F_L_O_O_R_P_L_A_N ----'CD KEYNOTES
o GlAZlNG SET IN WOOD OR ALUldlNtAl WINDOWS o ClAYT1lEROOF" CD C.OPPER GUTTER AND DOWNsPOUTS [}] STRUCTURAl. srm. COLUl.ltl o COHCREJER.OOR"SlAS [i] UNE OF ROOf OVERHEAD
CD POSSIBLE CORE CORRIDOR lOCAnoo o UN(OFRoorBELOW FORM4 2124 SOBRATO IDEVELOPMENT COMPANIES 126PIIIIStrul.3rclFloor Szn FranclaC:lIl. C,l,U108 T 0415.115.1741 F -415.775.1152
liTHE GUZZARDO PARTNERSHIP INC. Landscape Architects· Land PlaM8rs a3lihPoorlt;omwySlntfl. San Fr-ndseo, CA 5<4133 T"1543341i72 F"15433SOO3 LOS GATOS GATEWAY LOS GATOS , CALIFORNIA SOBRATO
DEVELOPMENT COMPANIES OFFICE BUILDING -2ND FLOOR PLAN A4 CD'ROJECT
n 1:: I ------i--------+--------_. -l-'--I,I .-_._-B -._----I!I-. , ----J---. ---, -------EB-,,, I 4t ELEV. '0;::_'
30'-0" 30'-0" @I30'-0' JO'-O' 30'-0" o I ::.--W--!--I 30'-0' ELEV. !1£. ;'W 30'-0' 30'-0'
CD30'-0' I oI . :: I l [, ,. iii NOTE: SEE SHEET A15 FOR EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS 30'-0' 0-----() �
� ,....---'® •�
� -""G) KEYNOTES [2] ItfTEGIW.. COLORED I'tASTEIl OVER lolETA/. STUO FRAMING [2] Gl.AZIN·G SET IN WOOD OR ALUt.lINUM WlNOOWS [2]CLWTIlEROOF
0 STRUClUitlJ..STEElCOl.UMN o CONCRErE R.OOR S1J,B [2] uta: Of ROOF o POSSIBLE CORE AND CORRIDOR LOC,/.,TIOK o UNECf'ROOF'
mow FORM4 2124 SOBRATO IDEVELOPMENT COMPANIES . 12:1 PCl&tSlrut, 3rdFIoor Sap Francisco, CA U101 T 1 !i • 7 7 , • 8 7 .c I F 415.775.1152 _ THE GUZZARDO PARTNERSHIP'NC.
Landscape Architects· Land Planners 134 Monlpntry Slrnt Tl1H334672 F"'1S433500J LOS GATOS GATEWAY LOS GATOS , CALIFORNIA SOBRATO DEVELOPMENT COMPANIES OFFICE
BUILDING -3RD FLOOR PLAN AS LUPROJECT
KEYNOTES [Q B'-S-.(IAIN) X lB'-O' STANDARD UH!Si/U [2] 9'-0' X lB'-O' STANDARO ACCESSIBLE STitt. o CONC.'IDECOLUt./NS· o 6" CONCRETE WHm stOP o 4-WHrJ£PAlNTEDS1RIPE 0CONCREJrCURB [2]
GW,GE ENTRY RAMP [!]lREHCHDl'Wtl o PAlNTED DIRECTIONAL ARROW GACCE5SlBLEPA,Ib{JNGSIGtW>E. @J UN£ or orneE BUILDING RIM G stAIR ACtESS
TO GROUND LEva ABOVE [G]CARAGEROlL-UPGATr GsrCURfTYFENCiNG TRASH ROOM (WITH 1RASH OIUTE TO UPPER FlOORS). I '::::1 \
\..........-\ \'. \ -" ' ':::..----.A ... ;, \ _...../...\ \. ;-,-T-.-, \ ., , ... -o-·i--- ® , , , =-( <p c;:> c;:> 0 @rifJ i .. ! t ! -_._--_.
_.._-----" .. ---.-_.... --_..".'---.---_..-... --c;:> 0 0 c;:> 0 'Cj) 0 @'f=i \ ! '" , .... . ... ! , i "1 ;r --', • . . r ! l ..
;--;";-:-:1-,; __;-''' ,,----.-" ,---;"----!r'T'-r",..( 7 I ; ij' , I ,_! ',..I _ .•• •__.. rfTTnJ : -......_---_..-....
\.. -........... C::=-J. S;;;:CAl;;;;;-:E:";:I·-;=,..;;;::..;;:-·--------------:-....:....:-.---:-.:-..;..;.:..::..:.....:::..::.-------------------------:-----------------------------------j®
LOWER LEVEL OFFICE BUILDING GARAGE PLAN <rSCAl:;;:;;;-E1::v·:;;'=30;;;:'.. :;;:·--------------:-.----------------:-"-------------------------------------------0 () ...__
.. 1 : t • : .,' •'. -'1'--;-: ,'; ; :: i I; ; I ./ ·..._'-.c....'--'
L_l.J'-:..L
�
� FORM4 2124 SOBRATO IDEVELOP,",ENT COMPANIES .. 12.6 PO$15Ir,,', 3rd Floor Sin Funcl,co, CA14108 T 41 5, 775 , 87 .. a F
415.775,87$2 liTHE GUZZARDO PARTNERSHIP'Nc, Landscape Architects Land Planners 8J6NonI;omOl)'Snot Sin Frandf,co,CAa413:l T415oW4672 F-4154333003 LOS GATOS GATEWAY LOS GATOS , CALIFORNIA
SOBRATO DEVELOPMENT COMPANIES GARAGE PLANS A6 Cr=DPDROJECT NORTH o 30' 80' 90' .....
I) C) Elf.V. W NOTE: SEE SHEET A15 FOR EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS ,tE<. •..:..:R:.::O..::O.:....F.
:..P=LA:...::N.:..------__® __...:.UI;.::L::..D:..:.;IN:.::G...:B=-•-
KEYNOTES o ROOF AT FlRSi FLOOR aELOW o ROOf AT SECOND FLOOR BELOW o ROOf AT llilRD flOOR BElOW GCLAYl1LEROOr
0COFPERGUTiERANOOOWtlSPOIJTS o IJECfWOC/.l ROOF SCR£EN (PART OF ROOF S'l'SiEt.I) [2j1YPICAl.I.lECIWllCAlUNIT6'X4'XS'(l..tIhH) FORM4 2124 SOBRATO IDEVELOPMENT COMPANIES
\ ... 126PostSlr•• t,3rdFloot SUI CA U10a T 41S. TT! .174' F 415.175.87$2. liTHE GUZZARDO PARTNERSHIPIHC. Landscape Archlteets ·Land P1.nnera 838 MolI'tQomerySl1Ml
T41543J.4672 F415433SOO3 LOS GATOS GATEWAY LOS GATOS , CALIFORNIA SOBRATO DEVELOPMENT COMPANIES OFFICE BUILDING -ROOF PLAN A7 LUPROJECT
()/l.IODflEO PROJECT k CURRENTlY APPR PROJECT PROPERTY UNE AT AN ANGLE If BUILDING A llEVEL 3 iI BUILDING AiLEVEL 2 ; ....-.-.. ;:..SI:..;,.TE:;,.S.:;..:E:;.:C:..;,.TI:.;:.O.:..:.NS=---,----'--i(
1 SCALE: 1116'"=1'.{l" C) UODIRED PROJECi , i J------------L----i I Ii I !PLAZA "". .. f PHASE ONE GARAGE WEVEl 3 .PHASE GARAGE 4EVEL 2 ; PHASE ONj::
GARAGE l;EVEL 1 FIRST SECOND 1l-\-_-II!dft-+::::::;J -;._TH_'R_D-;.:-;.__ ] _'__.M 1 "-----' SITE SECTION SCALE: 1f3T=1'-0" 2 FORM4 2124 o A' 8' ,,'
SITE SECTIONS A14 LOS GATOS , CALIFORNIA SOBRATO DEVELOPMENT COMPANIES LOS GATOS GATEWAY liTHE GUZZARDO PARTNERSHIPINC. Landseape Archltecta -Land Planners I36Montgom..,.8trMt
Sal Fnnc/K.o,CA10413J T<l1!'i.(3J4Q2 FA1S0433SOO3 121 po,lsla.t, 3rdFI1IlH SJn Fune!lclI, CA 1J,110a T ..( 1 5. 715 • a 7" 8 F 4115. 775.1752 SOBRATO IDEVELOPMENT COMPANIES
n ------------------------0
....,{".B..U...:...;I.;:,;:LO'-IN.:;,.G;;;.,:B=.Ll
---'® E:..;.V;.;;AT.:.:.IO.:.:N..:...•....l.{B=..U::.;IL:::O;.;.:IN.:.,:G:..;.A.;Ll ® o �
�•.I.::{B..:..UI:.::;LO.:.:I:..;.NG::....::.JB1'---------10 �
� (c.B.:.;UI.::;LD::.;IN..:,.G::.;B::.J.l CD
•.....l{;:;,.BU.:.:I=LO::..:.;IN..:...G:....:A..:.L)-----------..J0 FORM4 2124 SOBRATO IDEVELOPMENT
COMPANIES Form 4 125 POll Slrul, 3rd Floor Su Fnn;hco. CA 94101 T 415. 775 • a 1 •• F 415.775,1752 liTHE GUZZARDO PARTNERSHIP'NC. Landscape Arehilteta -Land Planners 83{1MontgomtryStrMt
SIn FrandKo,CAi41l3 F415oW5003 LOS GATOS GATEWAY LOS GATOS , CALIFORNIA SOBRATO DEVELOPMENT COMPANIES OFFICE BUILDING -EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS A15 :---16' 32' ....
·fi ....'.'.... , .. , '. ' . . -. .. . .... -- . '. f 1 J'" ,.,...".-.---.-,-_.__"".... -,c.. .• .. _.__ .•_ .._. IIII .�
� �
� �
� __.
OFFICE BUILDING -WALL SECTIONS o 4' 8' 12' �
� ____--__--_ FO RM4 2124 A16 KEYNOTES [2] um:GAAL COLORED PIASTER OvEn I.tETAL SliJD FRAI.llNG CD GlRING SET IN WOOD OR WINDOWS o ClAynlE Roar [TICOPI'fRGUl1ERANDDOwIlSPOvrs
Q]STRtY.:TUFALS1EELCOlUlAN 0 CONCRrrEnOO?SI.AB o UHE of ROOF (lI.IEI{HOO 0 UNEOF ROOf'B£l..O'If LOS GATOS , CALIFORNIA
SOBRATO DEVELOPMENT COMPANIES LOS GATOS GATEWAY liTHE GUZZARDO PARTNERSHIP INC. Architects. Land Planners "'.........." ..... s.n Franekeo. CA SoC133
F«1543J5003 , " 12G Po,' Sirut, :lrd Floor San Franell eo, CA 08 T '" 1 .5 • 1 7 5 • a 7 .( 8 F 415.775.8752 SOBRATO IDEVELOPMENT COMPANIES
() (21 r1] "-;-"...---{] ..._._.__ .. __,,,,,,",,,,'__._ f j ....,
.•.<."",.--'.;"..•..:.•... ,-"",-.,., -" _ �
� -,0 CD SCAlE: 1/4"=1'.(J"
FORM4 2124 A17 KEYNOTES [2] INTEGRAlCOLOREO PLASTER CNER "'ETAl: STUD FRAAllNG o GI.AZ1NG SET IN WCOO OR AlU\Illml.l WtNOOWS o ClAVlll.£ROor o COPPER CUTTfRAND OOW',fS?OlJJS o STRUCT\IR.&.LSTE!lCOLUW
I o CONCRriEflOORSlA8 (2] UNE Of ROOF OVERHEAD o POSSl9LE CORE AND CORRIDOR lOCATION o Ut/E OF ROOf 6El..O"1t OFFICE BUILDING -WALL SECTIONS LOS GATOS , CALIFORNIA SOBRATO DEVELOPMENT
COMPANIES LOS GATOS GATEWAY liTHE GUZZARDO PARTNERSHIP INC. landscape Architects • land PlanneD 83flMontQomefYSlreet SatlFranebc:o.CAII4133 T.(15433 <6672 F4154335003 126 PoatSlrut,
3rdFIoor San CA 1(10. T .. 1 5 • 77.5 . a 7 .. I F .(15.77.5 .1752 SOBRATO IDEVELOPMENT COMPANIES
--_.-_...---., ....,,:,".....:'---..----'--"--'-"-_':"::"'-I! /I , \ \\ .. ir\----\ BIKE f I\\\ t>EOESTRIAtJ T:tAll LINKING FUTIJRE
LIGHT RAil STATION TOTHECREEKTRAIL \\\ \ \ \ \i J:,\\ ..../' \\\\. ii \i\\ \\\\\ \\\
\ \ -,.} : , -------------__.. __-------- -------- --..--------===
...=:= -.-=-. ---_. - \ -..; '---------(). (·;V. \( . jI • 1\ • \( • Y\:::J _' __
::.:J _ \......... '-'" >--' ',-" .'---' . \ \ -\. --------\----\
\ -----c:::=-:\-\\ \ \ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \. \ \ \ 'I,. \ \, \ \ iUr'·.'.· \ \\\ \ \\ 0.... '\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ i I \ \ 1
\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \' \ \ \ ---..1.t\. l-\\\.\-/\ ...,. ---.' ( ) SOBRATO IDEVELOPMENT COMPANIES 126 Post Street, 3rd Floor San Francisco, CA 94108 T 415.775.8748 F
415.775.8752 liTHE GUZZARDO PARTNERSHIPINC. Landscape Architects oland Planners 836 Monl90mtl')'St1tel T4154334572 F.0415413S00) LOS GATOS GATEWAY LOS GATOS,
CALIFORNIA SOBRATO DEVELOPMENT COMPANIES SITE CIRCULATION DIAGRAM A18 PO ZONING MODIFICATION #2 PlANNING RESUBMlTTAI... #4 PLANNING RESUBMITTAl#3 PlANNING RESUBMITTAl. #2 PLANNING RESUBMIlTAl
PO ZONING MODIFICATION ARCH &SITE RESUBMrTTAL ARCH 8. SITE SUBMITTAl. 4UI 03.25.03 12.04.03 11.13.03 09.19.03 08.20.03 05.12.03 07.19.02 05.30.02au --d TGP INC. 03585 120' !
() \\\ 1"."1 I n I I I I I n I I I nil I I I rrn I I I I n I I I I n I I I I n I I I I n I 1"11II"1 II
SCALE: N.T.S. ! ____---'1"."1 I n I I I I I n I I I nil I I I rrn I I II n II I I n I I I I n I I I I n I I"1/IiJ "' J
__--:----l® SCALE: N,T.S. \ \\ I n I I I I I n I I I n I I II Irrn I I I I n I I 1I n I I I I n I I I I n I
I"."',---" \\ \\ \ ------CD FORM4 2124 SOBRATO IDEVELOPMENT COMPANIES 126 Post Strut, 3rd Floor San Franc:hto, CA 94108
T '15.775.17". F 415.775.8752 liTHE GUZZARDO PARTNERSHIPINC. Landsc::ape Architects .lolnd Planners SanFnnclseo,CA8oC133 T41S0433A872 F415433SOO3 LOS GATOS GATEWAY
LOS GATOS , CALIFORNIA SOBRATO DEVELOPMENT COMPANIES SHADOW STUDY A19 E9® PROJECT NORTH TRUE NORTH o 16' 32' A.a'
i' \\\\ \ \"11I"1 I n I I 1 1 I nil I n 1 II I I rrn I I 1 I nil lin I 1lin I I I I n I I".", �
� I n I II I I n III n 1II I I rrn I I 1I
n II I I nil 1 1nlill n \
0 \\\\ \ \ \ 1-."1 I nil I lin I I I nil 1 I I rrn I I lin I 1lin I I I I n I I II n I 1"11I"' \\ \ \\ \ __�
� o FORM 4 2124 '" EB® PROJECT NORTH lRUE NORTli 16' 32' A20 LOS GATOS , CALIFORNIA
SOBRATO DEVELOPMENT COMPANIES SHADOW STUDY LOS GATOS GATEWAY liTHE GUZZARDO PARTNERSHIPIHC, Landscape Archttecb· Land Planners 136 Montgomtfy StrlIet San FntIdKo, CA 1.(154334612
F.tU.035003 126 PflltStrut,3rdFhll" Sin FnncllcfI, CA '.108 T .( 1 S • 77 S •• 1 .. a F 415.175.1752 SOBRATO IDEVELOPMENT COMPANIES I
-----------CD SCAlE: FOR M4 2124 ,
I SOBRATO IDEVELOPMENT COMPANIES 128 POll Slr"t. lrd float San Funehca, CA 9.(10e T 0( 1 5 • 17 S • a 7 0( a F 415.775.8152 lilliE GUZZARDO PARTNERSHIPINC. Landscape Arcf1ttects· Land
Planners 136 Montgomory 8tne1 SMlFratleiseo,CA&t133 H15-4334612 FoI1S.c.335003 LOS GATOS GATEWAY LOS GATOS • CALIFORNIA SOBRATO DEVELOPMENT COMPANIES CONSTRUCTION PHASING PLAN A21 PROJECT
NORTM TRUE HORTH o 50' 100' 150'
( ENTRYSTAlRS \ AND ELEVATOR \ \\\\\\\\\\\ (\\\\\.\ \\\\\\\ ENHANCED \ ..... ROADWAY PAVING. TYP. _' ' UTILITY, AND FIRE ARE TO BE SCREENED
WITH LANDSCAPE PLANTING, TYPICAlLY. L ,RIPARIAN P I I LOS GATOS CREEK \\ \\---\-STREET A ENTRY MONUMENfs
. \ FENCE, . -\ \ \ \ \. -----------------------........ \ (\ \ -------L SOBRATO IDEVELOPMENT COMPANIES 126 Post Street,
3rd Floor San Francisco. C.A 9410a T 415.775.8748 F 415.775.8752 • THE GUZZARDO PARTNERSHIP'Nc. l.iIndscape Architects· und
SanFro1nC&o,CA941J3 T4154334672 F415433SOO3 LOS GATOS GATEWAY LOS GATOS, CALIFORNIA SOBRATO DEVELOPMENT COMPANIES SCHEMAl1C LANDSCAPE PLAN L1 PO ZONING MODIFICATION #'l PLANNING RESUBMITTAl
#4 PLANNING RESUBMnTAL#3 PLANNING RESUBMlTTAL #2 PLANNING RESUBMITTAl PO ZONING MODIACATION ARCH &SITE RESUBMITTAL ARCH &SITE SUBMITTAl o 4. b d 03.25.03 12,04.03 11.13.03 09.11:1.03
08.20.03 05.12.03 07.19.02 05.30.02SO' d TGP INC. 03585 ".I
SDecies Condition ----_----I_.--------(/\'" EXISTING TREES TO BE SAVED ""':\,<-(XX-S). SEE TREE SURVEY FOR \ DESCRIPTION AND TREE PROTECTIO \ GUIDELINES.
\\E>(1STING OFF-SITE TREES TO BE \..:-,---PRoTECTED. SEE TREE SURVEY GUIDELINES. \ \ PREVIOUSLY REMOVED
'\ \. \ \ ... \ 0< -----).------\ .. \\ . .. ....-"""""-\\\--------..
KEY XX-X---Oisp'osition L. R -previously removed 5 -to be saved T -to be tronsplonted Tree Number Refer to tree survey by S. P. McClenahan, doted 8-10-00 for tree species. ClOd
size. \\\ \ EXISTING BE TRANSPLA (XX-T), lfEPLACE ANY FAILE ..jl-96° BOX TREE. \ 1. Allt....... ......<l4hcllb<!vetlfledbythoT
OOtnorbotlstlo en",,,, o:onfomanco with Conditions or """"""''' Thi.t =hOIi OCC.... prior 10 tile remove! 0' any , ....... 2. Heighborln'l ......... -mangln')
the .houl<l be Ptolcetod fn>m oll" .."". Impo"'o In III<: OOmo mon",' "" o...tlng I.""" 10 be Pl"ello-.:l. 3. Trotdriploneo""".hollbcl TREE PROTECTION/PRUNING
NOTES Condition Fair to Good Fair Fair to_ Good Fair to Good Fair Fir Fair F', Fir ad Good Foir Fair to Good Foir Foir to Good Foir to Good Fair to Good Fair to Good Fair Fair
',' Fair Foir Fo;r fair to Good Fir Good Good Foir to Good Fair Good Goo. Fair lo Good G d , Fair Fair Fair to Good Fair Fair lo Good Fair Fair to GOod Fair Fair Feir Good Fair Fair
Fair fair to Good Fair 10 Good Fair to Good Fair fair Fair lo Good Fair to Good Fair Goo Good Fair La Good Condition fair to Good Fair to Good Fair to Good PGood Good .--;::--;:: Poor
10 fair Dead Poor to Fair Poor to fair Fair Poor Poo, Pooc p,:::;:-t...·j:---:::;r Dead Poor to fair ed Ironbork -i:....n Irn ric ed Ironbark nO"'", eo_;, oost Redwood oost Redwood Coast
Redwood aosl Redwood Hall ood Ju i er Bradford Pear Coast Redwood Coast Redwood Golden Rain Tree Coast Redwood Deodar Cedar Conarv Island Pine Deodar Cedar Cona Island Pine Block Wolnul
Coosl Redwood Block Walnut Block Wolnut Coast Redwood Coast Redwood lack Walnut Coost Redwood Coast Redwood Blue: Elderbe Jooanesc Loouot Almond Blackwood Acacia Blackwood Acacia Blackwood
Acacia oved Species Cono Island Pine Coast live Oak California Pepper Ii rnio P I k W I California P er Block Walnut 'Slue Elderber lack Walnut· Cona Island Pine Hollv Oak Red Iranbark
Red lronbark Red Ironbork Red Ironbork Red Ironbork River Gum Montere C press Incense Cedar Coast live Ook e ron or Red lronbluk Shamel.Ash Shamel Ash Shamel Ash S oecies Deodar Cedar
Deodar Cedar Coast Redwood Coasl Redwood Coast Redwood Coast Redwood Golden Rain Cono Island Pine Red Ironbork Coast Redwood Fair t d ConaN -Island Palm F ·r--;;:r;:::::;-Cona Islond
Palm F ir IOUSLY ril;ot Coast Live Oak Shomel Ash Co'e ul Hollywood Juniper Hollywood Hollywood Juniper Blue Elderberry Almond Bradford Pear 8. Tronsoiontoble 50edmens Tree P Diameter
lnc:hes 52 7.7 45 6.9 53 11.9 64 20.3 37 13.4 38 1.3.4 41 8.6 43 6.5 66 39.1 67 -4.0.7 4 9.9 c. Trees Removed 9 Tree" Diameter Inches 1 11.9 2 15 SUMM RY OF TREES REMOVED ; . Tree Diameter
Inches 3 7.9 8 10.6 " 17 7.6. 7.8 19 6.2,5.0. 4.0 20 7.7 26 12.7. 11.3. 11.2 . 27 9.2. 6.4. 6.8 33 16.5 7 '7 10 10.7 11 7.5 12 6.7 13 13.4 1. '.2 15 7.8 '6 7.' 30 31 24.8 32 11.3
3. 1"1.3 35 28.5 36 18.3 3S 7.8 40 1. 42 ,.S 44 16.7 46 13.4 47 19.6 48 12.6 4' 23.9 54 17.2 55 19.5 56 15.5 57 15.5. 15.2 58 3.6 3.0 2.0 2.0 59 20.4. 13.8 60 15.1 61 18.0 62 14.7 63
19.7 65 15.5 C) 68 13.6 6' 18.2 ummo of Trees to ·be Tree Diameter inches 5 21.1 '8 4 21 18.1 " 18. 23 12.9 14.1
8.4. 13.8. 8.2 24 12.6 ?S 26 8.0 7.' 7.7 6. 2' '.5 8.1 104.0 13.1 50 16.3 51 18.6 70 71 4.2 72 6.3 73 6.9. 7.3 74 6 75 6.5 76 '.7 77 6.B 78 11.2 7S 30.4 80 4.2.6.0 , .. 3.0. 4.5. 6.2
82 3.7. 5.7 83 5.4. 2.8, 4.8. 8 88 7.7 8' 6. 6, 6 PlANNING RESUBMITTAl RESUBMITTAl #4 12.04.03 TGP INC. 03585 . 8ft d 40' I PD ZONING MODIFICATION 05.12.03 ARCH &SITE RESUBMrTTAL
07.19.02 ARCH &SITE SUBMIITAI. 05.30.02 PlANNING RESUBMITTAl #3 11.13,03 PO ZONING MODIFICATION #2 03.25.03 TREE DISPOSITION PLAN L2 LOS GATOS, CALIFORNIA SOBRATO DEVELOPMENT COMPANIES
LOS GATOS GATEWAY PARTNERSHIP'NCLandscape Architects· Land Planners 836MontgomerySuul SanFr.aIXi$(Q,CA!I4133 T4154334672 F41S<ll)35003 126 Post Street, 3rd Floor
San Francisco, CA 94108 T 415775.8748 F 415.775.8752 SOBRATO IDEVELOPMENT COMPANIES IL
PIN CAN .";: BETNIG Shrub ZOne 4 PLAACE,lyp 1-""----Existing "Trees to Remain, See Tree Disposition Plan. Typ, QUE LOB "'T--'-\-"7'''T'v----C?EXISTING TREE TO REMAIN 2a-5 SEQSEM .....-.
VVINCHESTER 50UL::VARD ".' ._. __ ., _.. ... \, PLA!,,'-r=J) CQ1,J;::n'AIl.OS \ , .'<\ _.. .._--\ i " \\ ". '-'l.'•.-.....-.............r-· .. SHRUB
ZONE LEGEND \ Zone 1 Courtyard Area Planted wI Garden Ornamental -: Zone 2 -Building Perimeter Area Planted 80lh Ornamenta,1 and. Native Species
Tolerant Species . PLAACE TYP. ..__......-_....0V _.-' ...-_...-......•._.
:-Z_1 .... _ e.-_ ---- --__-....' SU&SHR1JBS ANI) -'CCENT SHRUBS =.-i I PLANT LIST o 40' 80' ( j SOBRATO
IDEVELOPMENT COMPANIES 126 Post Street, 3rd Floor San Francisco, CA 94108 T T 415.775.8748 F 415.775.8752 • THE GUZZARDO PARTNERSHIP'NC. Landscape Afdlitects· Land 836 Mot1lgon>ef)'Slreo
et SlInFr.ncmo,CA94133 14154)14672 F415433SOO3 LOS GATOS GATEWAY LOS GATOS, CALIFORNIA SOBRATO DEVELOPMENT COMPANIES PLANTING PLAN L3 PO ZONING MODIFICATION #2 PlANNING RESUBMITTAl #4
PLANNING RESUBMITTAL #3 PlANNING RESUBMITTAL #2 PlANNING RESUBMITTAl PO ZONING MODIFICATION ARCH &SITE RESUBMlTTAl ARCH &SITE SUBMITTAl 03.25.03 12.04.03 11.13.03 09.19.03 0810.03 05.12.03
07.19,02 05.30.02 TGP INC. 03585 12. 1
STRf2ET. A . r.,.;:. ....:./;:.-;:W r,;....4,;;.rvl STREET ft. .. ....._.-..... _....:.._..__.
. . ., . .'(.,. --.,.-'. "_. i".' NOTE· NO TRENCHING FOR WIRE CONDUITS IS TO OCCUR WITHIN TREE PROTECTION ZONES. POLE LIGHT· PF 191 ON 12' CHARLOTTE POLE BY
ELA COMPANY 800.423.6561 BOLLARD LIGHT· TB361 BY HADCO 510.638.3800 BOTH WITH LAMPS THE MEDITERRANEAN LANTERN NITE STAR BY B-K LIGHTING 559.438.5800 WITH ALUMINUM CANOPY FOR TRELLIS
MOUNT AND MR-16 LAMP. DOWNLIGHT 126 Post Street, 3rd Floor San Francisco, CA 94108 T 415.775.8748 F 415.775.8752 PLANNING RESUBMITIAL #2 09.19.03 TGP INC. 03585 BO' I 40' d ARCH &SITE
RESUBMlTTAI.. 07.19.02 ARCH &SITE SUBMlTIAL PO ZONING MODIFICATION:l2 03.25.03 PLANNING RESUBMITTAl #4 12.04.03 PlANNINGRESUBMITTAL#3 11.13.03 �
� PO ZONING ZONING MODIFICATION 05.12.03 L4 LOS GATOS GATEWAY LOS GATOS, CALIFORNIA SOBRATO DEVELOPMENT COMPANIES
SITE LIGHTING PLAN GUZZARDO I a36 Montgome<y Slreet 1 San Fratl(k(o,CA 94133 T41S4334672 F'llS433SOD3 Ii II :. •· •••.•• .f-IIi j••.•.•••.
III I I IDEVELOPMENT COMPANIES L
NOTES. L Contractor to 5lJbmlt complete shop ArchItect for reYlel"l prior I:d 2. for VSB
In exterior sltvotlons Hhere freeze! thaw cycles OCGlJr. 3. All constnJctlOt'l to be w"lded .steel. 6r1nd all ...w.lds smooth• . 4. �
� codes and regulatIons. Keyed OCGeSS on exterlOl'" side of gate. -------1-Square Tube Steel PIGkets Gentereo on Rolls ----'----lIe" Thick Stael Plate I:a Pool Side of 6ote.
Grlrld all Edges' smooth. center' on Fence ,,' ,---,,-'------::r x TLbe Steel 6ate Frame ,-----------9/lfl" Hide by 1-1/4" Deep 5c.ore
Joint at " a.c.. or as-ShoHn on DrQHlngs. ,--'----------6"x6" HJr.I.M. Center In Pour"", Hold;3M From All Edges.
Bead Over. Golor to adJaGent Paving. Homex by .Homosote,
Trenton. NJ 60Cl.eeS.9900. All Joints . to ·O",.ur @20' D.C.. Max.. at Matarlol Interfac.es. and as ShoHn on DroHlng=- See Golor Glas5
II Aggregate Bose, Gompacted to at least '10% "--------Sub-grade to at least qQ% . o Concrete Poving 2" x 2" tube steel top and bottom
roll. Ralls on Post 11'--1---ConGrete Pa....lng ..../6x6. IOXIO HYiF Centered In Pions. see eclor 't--i-----if--'--�
�and Drain Hat o Paving On-structure �
�_ _ _ Not. to 5c.ale StIbgr.ode ona Bose per 6eOlec.hnlcol Report. . . ,------Drip
SGreed ,-------Point i"loll to Match StUGGo Color 1-1+-------eM) Hall HI*t4 Rebor Vertlc.ol 0 .24" O.G. ot Genter line of wall and #4 Rebar-HarlzontGll D.C.. TIe VertlGal Rebar
Into Footing as shai"ll"l, alternating bands.. Flit all cells full. Stucco FInish for All Exposed Hall SurfaGeS. see Galor and Finish SChedule for informatIon. l'lrr----------d=3f}.-------Pre-cast
Concrete Hall Cop. 5ee Color and Finish 5che:dule. I ·1II Llghll-l6lght Soli Hix Hc:rterprooflrlg ond ProWGtlon Boord on Floor!> 0'Id BlaGk. Hdl1 Q!o 5I1oNn. IJse
c.MJ Hall !"tJ'#4 R.!lbor VertlGal c 24" O.G. at center IIrIe of Hall and Rebar Hot'lzont.al Q!o shol-ln. Fill oils GI!IIIs Fl./ll. See Color and FlnlN1 5Ghedllle for Block.
0I'ld finlY!. ;2" 1'hIGl:, 6eI0t"Gh Drain 600rd ,..Ith Filter FabrIc. !"rap FCll:Jr1G. up HeIns to I" Selol'l Top of Soli. Bottom exit Plonter Drain, Zum ZIOS-c.
ConGrels Topplrlg Slob with 6xfl, 10xi0 !"lHF Gflntsl"ed In Pour. Slope to DrolnS or os perS'.rllGWral Englnoer. Line.
.24.•"SO's.GD. .TIe Into topping" =,lttgj. and l1oierprooflng (SAO) ------;=============$61')LO!jOUtPionfor AdjOUnt
Paving COnditIon. I'bll c.ep. 506 COlor and ,-----4" Dlo. PVc. lrepeGtlon PIpe at Eoc.h Plonter Drain Exc.ept In LC:II'ln. Po not GOlTl6Gt to Drain. COp Top (:It 5011 Level. Point All
Exposed Sw'foc:es Bloc.K. TGP INC. 03585 PD ZONING MODIFICATION #2 03.25.03 PLANNING RESUBMITIAL #4 12.04.03 PlANNING RESUBMITIAI...#3 11.13.03 PLANNING RESUBMITTAL#2 09.19.03 PL::ANNiNG
RESUBMITIAl 08.20.03 PO ZONING MODIFICATION 05.12.03 ARCH &SITe RESUBMITIAL 07.19.02 ARCH &SITE SUBMITTAl 05.30.02 1"-! 4,0' SO' e---o ;;d L5 LOS GATOS GATEWAY LOS GATOS, CALIFORNIA
SOBRATO DEVELOPMENT COMPANIES CONSTRUCTION DETAILS liTHE GUZZARDO PARTNERSHIP'NC. Lanc:isalpe Land Planners Planners 83GMolltgomeryStreet Sin Frand$(O, CA94133 1415"1334572
f4154335003 126 Post Street, 3rd Floor San Francisco, CA 94108 T 415.775.8748 F 415.775.8752 SOBRATO IDEVELOPMENT COMPANIES
Po. EXISTING __. H52-T #1-R l&*r;---JOB NO. AOO034 •(;) • 120 ! !i11!!!!!!!!1 --FS---_·_--i"t·· ..---SS--.... _.....;;.;-_.-._. --ow-- ---R--ASf'HALT
CONC?ETE AGGREGATE BASE BUILDING CATCH BASIN CONCRETE DOMESTIC WATER EXISTING FINISH flOOR FlRE GRADE BREAK HIGH P:OINT INVERT IRRIGATION PAVEMENT GRADE RIM ELEVATION RAIN
WATER LEADER STORM DRAJN MANHOLE STORU DRAIN TO? or CUR6 PROPOSED so AC AS 8LDG C8 CONe ow EX FF FS 08 HP IN... IRR pV R..IM.. SOMH so TC Scale 1M '" 40 ft o 40 EX. TREE TO BE REMOVED
[Y.. TREE TO BE SAVED VEHICLE CIRDJLATION WATER METtR 1ilENCH DRAIN EX. TREE 10 BE TRANSPLANTED SITE SECTIONS CURB « GUTTER FIRE SERVICE SANITARY SEWER STORM DRAIN WATER DOMESTIC WATtl<:
PO ZONING MODlFlCA11ON 2 03,25114 PLANNING RESUBMlTIAL #2 09.19.03 . PLANNING RESUBMlTTAl OB.20.03
PO ZONING AMENDMENT 05.12.03. ABBREVIATIONS PROPERTY UNE ADJACENT PROPERiY UNE BlO SWALE BASEMENT WALL CENTERLINE EASEMENT SPOT GRADE FIRE HYDRANT FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION BACKFLOW
PREVENTER (RPP T'rPE) POST INDICATOR VAlVE. (SECTIONAL VALVE) AREA DRAIN CATCH 6ASlN (WI FOSSIL FILTER) STORM DRAIN MANHOLE SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE CONTOUR RIDGE CUR8 SLOTTED CURB C1
\ \ M\ \=," PRELIMINARY GRADING &UTILITY PLAN LOS GATOS, CALIFORNIA SOBRATO DEVELOPMENT COMPANIES f41S,,'U SOO3 , • K1ER & WRIGHT CIVIL ENGIII'IRS ! SlllVEYORS.
INC. 22 (.;!J;)nHfJ.b 5oolo CJoro, f.IJ 126 Post Street, 3rd Floor San Francisco,
CA 94108 T 415.7758748 F 415.775.8752 ,.'t ; il' /(.._,,\\ ./II I$OBRATO LJDEVELOPMENT COMPANIES () "-.. II C-1S. c-as. A-SlTt, C-TTlS-ORCP. L-LSCP.
C-PA\'E 1:\d"9\AOOO)4\PL""ltllllO\ORC t.lAIlCli 2-1, 2004 12:3J. Pl.l
280 ..�
� 275---'--------:-.=: . ---.------275 SECTION A SECTION B HORll. ," .. 20' \JtRT.l" .. S' SECTION C HORIZ.'" _ 20' 'lEliT. to,", S' 280 ---·-----u,--.=.;;;n;;-"7;-----------------280
270 :8.="'=.OOO=."..-:;nr.-....-._-_-..-..-._-.-.-.-.__--",,.--:-"" BUIlDING -rr£2li6:0'--------------....,.-----.---.----"• .:. --
-...----_._--'"'--.,-_ . .._--265 265 __.. __
:· LOT ._________ _l.1.. _ '""'" . 260, 260 SECTION .0 HOOt!. 1" -20' 'fERT. \" .. S· 275 ..""'''''r71T-------:---· 275 ____•• ._.-8IJIU)lIi/(;..
• Ff"'Z72 0 265 -.-=---··-YNeER(;IlGl;lND···· 260 260 SECTION F HORl2. I" ..
20' VERT. 1" .. S' HORIl. 1" .. 20' VERi. 1"-5' ---_._---"_._._-----_._-------.._--_..----_..__.._---------- _.._._-_.
275 ----------------------------------275 .,i I . DEVELOPMENT COMPANIES 126 Post Street, 3rd Floor San Francisco, CA 94108 T 415.7758748 F 415.775.6752 GUZZARDO PARTNERSHIPINC
ndsc:ape Architects· Land Plan 1136 MorItgornery'StJeC't T41S<II334672 ' KIER & WRIGHT •CIVil WcnURS ! S1llVEYORS, INC.
&iB;.; (lre!71i-l6il Sr;1lc C!(lI>j, ru (4Mjm·1.41 LOS GATOS GATEWAY LOS GATOS, CALIFORNIA SOBRATO DEVELOPMENT COMPANIES PRELIMINARYCROSSSEcnONS
C2 .-------. JOB NO. A00034 PLANNINGRESUBMITTAl#3 11.13.03 PLANNING RESUBMfTTAL It2 09.19.03 PLANNING RESUBMITTAI... 0820.03 PD ZONING AMENOMENT 05.12.03 d b ";"0(.: C-TllB-DRCP. C-SECT
USER:","""dlen 1:\<j"'9\AOOO3'l\Pv.NNING\PRC IolARCH 2-4. 2004 12:51 PM
_____________________ STORM DISCHARGE CALCULATIONS I. PERVIOUS/IMPERVIOUS' AREA EXISTING PROPOSED ,. TOTAL AREA: (ACRES) 12.28::1; 12.28::1; -i. TOTAL PERVIOUS
AREA: (ACRES) 6.76::1: 4.17± 3. TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA: (ACRES) 5.52± 8.1I± 4. ?o IMPERVIOUS: 45.0 66.1 II. CALCULATIONS RUNOFf' CALCULATIONS: C= RUNOFF COEFFICIENT (WEIGHTED) 1= RAINfALL
lNlENSITY A= AREA IN ACRES 1. RUNOFF COEmCIENT: ! I +] I 0.54 0.66 TOTAL "ACRES I 2-INTENSITY: (IN./HR.) !
I 0.97 "'.25 CONCENTRAnON ) BASED ON WEIGHlED {C} (SEE ABOVE) AND HIGHWAY DESIGN MANUAL (FIG. 816.6A 1987) 3. DISCHARGE: 0 ..C1A (CfS) 6.43 10.44 III. SUMMARY
STAlEMENT THE PROJECT POST CONSTRUCTION DISCHARGE WILL BE EQUAl TO OR .LESS THAN THE PRE CONSTRUCTION DISCHARGE. STATION NO. A.DJUSTEO MEAI' ANItUAL PRECIPITATION 1918'
1.961 nOon Where: , C "" Runoff Coefficient L = Overland Travel Distance In feet S S Cl Slope In ft./ft. To = TIme In minutes Figure 816.6A Overland Time of Concentration Curves HIGHWAY
DESIGN MANUAL C;;O.S4 L=aoo' 5=0.0\3 Tc:=27 min. e-O.68 L..SOO· 5_0.013 1,.19 min. 1: _ 1.8(1.1-e)(L)1/2 o - TIME OF CONCENTRATION CURVE SJ INTENSITY CURVE --------_._--_._---
-ON-Srr.: DRAINAGE DETENTION SYSTEM [EX. -=: ==: f=.=:::J scvv.o OUTFALL JUNCTION smUCTURE ON-SIiE DRAINAGE UNDERGROUND STORAGE PIPE THE STORAGE VOLUME IS A PRELIMINARY
CALCULATION ONLY * INSTALL ORIFICE AT INLET OF EX. 2.;" STM. TO UMIT POST-DEVELOPMENT DISCHARGE TO EQUAL OR LESS THAN PRE-DEVELO?MENT DiSCHARGE. NOT TO SCALE DETENTION SYSTEM NOT TO
SCALE OBRATO DEVELOPMENT COMPANIES 126 Post Street, 3rd Floor San FrancIsco, CA 94108 T 415.775.8748 F 415.775.8752 LOS GATOS GATEWAY LOS GATOS, CALIFORNIA SOBRATO DEVELOPMENT COMPANIES
RUNOFF CALCULATIONS C3 PO ZONING MODIFICATION 2 PLANNING RESUBMITTA1.. #4 PLANNING RESUBMITTA1.. #3 PLANNING RESUBMITTA1.. #2 PlANNING RESUBMITTAl PD ZONING AMENDMENT 12.04.Q3
11.13.03 09.19.Q3 OS.2O.03 05.12.03 JOB NO. A00034
EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONJROI MEASIRES' 2. CIVIL ENGINEER: KIER AND WRIGHT, 03350 SCOTT BLVD.. BLDG, 22. SANTA CLARA; CAo 9S054. (406) 727-6665. o3. CONSTRUCTION SUPERINltNDENT: TO BE
THIS PLAN IS INltHOED TO SE USED fOR lNltRIt.l EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL ONLY AND IS NOT TO BE USED FOR fiNAL ELEVATIONS. OR PERl,IANENT IMPRO\1::MENTS. s. SOUTH
8AY CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE fOR MONlTORING EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES PRIOR, DURING. AFTER STORM EVENTS. 6. REASONA8LE CARE SHALl. BE TAKEN WHEN HAULING
ANY" EARTH. SAND. GRAVEL STOllE. DEBRIS. OR ANY OTHER SUBSTANCE OVER ANY PUBLIC STREET. ALLEY OR OTHER PUBLIC PLACE. SHOULD ...NY BLOW. SPILL. DR TRACK OVER AND UPON SAID PUBUC OR ADJACENT
PRIVATE PROPERTY. It,lMEDIATE REMEDY SHAlL OCCUR. 7. SANITARY fACILITIES SHAlL BE MAINTAINED ON THE SITE. B. DURING THE RAINY SEASON. ALL PAVED AREAS SHALL BE KEPT CLEAR Of EARTH MATERIAL
}oND DEBRIS. THE SITE SHAU-BE MAINTAINED SO AS TO t.lIN!t.tIZE SEDIMENT LADEN RUNOF'f' TO ANY STORM DRAINAGE SYSl'EtJ. INCLUDINC EXISTlNG DRAINAGE SWALES AND WATER COURSES. 9. CONStRUCTION
OPERATION SHALL BE CARRIED OUT IN SUCH A MANNER THAT EROSION AND WAltR POllUTION WILL BE t.lINIMlZED. STATE AND LOCAL LAWS CONC£RNlNG POl.lUTION ABATEMENT SHALL BE COM!"LIEO WI'Tli.
10. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE DUST CONTROL AS REOUIRED BY THE APPROPRIATE FEDERAL, STAlE AND LOCAL AGENCY REQUIREMENTS. 5. If H'l'DROSEEDING IS NOT USEO OR IS NOT EFfECTlv'£. BY 10/10.
'TliEN OTHER IMMEDIATE M£1'HOOS SHALL BE IMPLEMENltD, SUCH AS EROSION CONTROL BlANKETS, OR A THREE-STEP APPUCATION OF l)SEED, MULCH. FERTILIZER 2)BLOWli STRAW o3)TACl<IAER AND MULCH.
6. INLET PROTECTION SHALL BE INSTALLED AT OPEN INLETS TO PREVENT SEDIMENT FROM ENTERING THE STORM DRAIN SYSTEM. INLETS EROSION CONTROL {'<P.E
TO BE LOCliED TO 7. THIS EROSION ANO SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN MAY NOT COVER AlL THE SITUATIONS THAT MAY ARISE DURING CONSTRUCTION DUE TO UNANTICIPATED fiLED CONDITIONS. VARIATIONS AND ADOlTIONS
ADOlTIONS MAY BE MADE TO iHIS PLAN IN 'TliE fiELD. NOTlF'Y lliE CITY REPRESENTATIVE Of ANY FIElD CHANGES. THE fACILITIES SHO'M'l ON THIS PLAN ARE DESIGNED TO CONTROl EROSION AND Sf:OIMEI'lT
DURING lliE RAINY SEASON, OCToeER 15 TO APRIL 15. fACIUTIf:S ARE TO BE OPERABLE PRIOR TO OCTOBER 1 OF ANY YEAR. CRADING OPERATIONS DURING THE RAINY SEASON \WiICH LEAVE DENUDED SLOPES
SHALL BE: PROTECTED Vo1TH EROSION CONTROL MEASURES IMMEDIATELY FOLLOW,NG GRADING ON SLOPES. "2. THIS PLAN COVERS ONLY THE FlRST 'MNTER fOLLOWING GRADING WITH ASSUMED snE CONDITIONS AS
SHOWN ON THE EROSlON CONTROL PLAN. PRIOR TO SEPTEMBER 15. THE COMPLETION OF SITE IMPROVD.tENT SHALL BE EVALUATED AND REVISION t.lADE TO THIS PLAN AS NECESSARY THE APPROVAL OF'
THE Cln' ENGINEER. PLANS ARE TO 6£ RESUBMln'ED F'OR orr APPROVAL PRIOR TO SEPTEMBER 1 or EACH SU8SEOUENT YEAR UN1lL SITE IMPROVEMENTS ARE ACCEPTEO BY THE CITY. J. CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES
$HAU-BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF CRADING. ALL CONSTRUCTION TRAFAC ENTERING ONTO THE PAVED ROAD MUST CROSS THE STABIUZEO CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE WAYS. 4. CONTP.ACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN
STABILIZED ENTRANCE AT EACH VEHICLE ACCESS POINT TO EXISTING PAVED STREETS. ANY MUD OR DEBRIS TRACKED PU6LIC STREETS SHALL BE REMOVED DAlL't AND AS REQUIRED B)" THE CITY.
r.rurRt.! EROSION AND SflllMENT CONTROl NOIfS' OWNER: SOBRATO DEVELOPMENT COMPANY. 10600 N. DE ANZA. BLVD•• STE 200. CUPERTINO. CALIFORNIA 95014-:!:O75. (4<18) 446"':0700. IT SHALL Bf:
llif: CONTRACTOR'S RESPOUSlStUTY TO MAINTAIN CONTROL Of THE ENTIRE CONSTRUCTION OPERATION AND TO KEEP 'iHE ENTIRE Silt IN COMPLIANCE V.1TH THE SOIL EROSION PLAN. 2 AE-BARS OR :r x 2'
DRIVEN 12" TO 18" INTO THE GROUND STAKES ARE TO 8E ORIVEN FLUSH Wl'Tli lHE TO? OF' THE BALES ANCHORING DETAIL NOT TO SCALE STRAW DIKE ENTRENCH BALES A UNDISTURBED Of 4'
INTO THE GROUND CROUND ",' VERTICAl FACE ANGLE. FlRST STAKE TOWARD Tl-lE PREVIOUSlY PLACED BALE EXISTING GROUND N.T.S. C4 FILTER FABRIC CATCH BASIN INLET PROTECTION t.lAlNTEN;NC" tlOlFS"
PROVIDE APPAOPRIATE TRANSITION BETWEEN STAB1UZED CONSTRUCTION ENlRANCE AND PUBUC RIGl-lT-Of,...WAY. . MAINTENANCE -THE ENTRANCE SHALL BE MAUnl,lNEO IN A THAT Y<lLL PREVENT
TRACKING OR FLOWING SEDIMENT ONTO PUBLIC RIGHTS-OFWAY. THIS MAY REQUIRE PERIODIC TO? DRESSING WITH ADOITIONAl STONE AS CONDITIONS DEMAND. AND REPAIR AND/OR CLEAN OUT ANY MEASURES USED
TO TRAP SEDIMENT. -AlL SEDIMENT WASHED. OR TRACKED ONTO PUBUC RIGHTS-OF-WAY SHAlL BE REt.lOVED IMMEDIATELY. -WHEN NECESSARY. WHEELS SHAU-BE CLEANED TO
REMOVE SEDIMENT PRIOR TO ENTRANCE: ONTO PUBliC RIGHTS-OF'-WAY. li·US SHALL SE DONE AT AN AREA STASIUZf:O WITH CRUSHED STONE. WHICH DRAINS • INTO AN APPROVED SEDIMENT 1?,AP OR SEOIM£NT
BASIN. STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE NOT TO SCALE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY /3 C4 1. MA1NlENANCE IS TO B£ PERfORMED AS F'OLLOWS: A. REPAIr: QAMAGtS CAUSED BY SOIL EROSION OR COtlSTRUCTlON'AT
THE END Of EACH WORKING D;.Y. B. SWALES SHALL BE INSPECTED PERIODICALLY AND MAINTAINED AS NEEDED. C. SEOIMf:NT TRAPS. BERMS. AND SWALES ARE TO BE INSPECTED ArTER EACH STORM AND REPAIRS
MADE AS NEEDED. D. SEDIMENT SHALL BE REMOVED AND SEDIMENT TRAP RESTOREO TO ITS ORIGINAl DIMENSION YMEI'l SEDIMENT HAS ACCUMULATED TO A DEPTH Of 1 FOOT. E. SEDIMENT REMOVED FROM TRAP
$HALL BE OEPOSITED IN A SUITABLE AREA AND IN SUCH A MANNER TliAT IT WILL NOT ERODE. f. RILL ANO GULUES MUST BE REPAIRED. 2. SAND BAG INLET PROTECllON SHALL BE CLEANED OUT WHENEVER SEDIMENT
OEPTH IS· ONE HALF THE HEIGHT OF ONE: SANO BAC EROSION AND SEOlIJENT cnNTRQ! NARRATIVE 1. EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE IMPLEMENTED BY OCTOBER 1ST OF EACH 'fEAR ANO
MAINTAINED THROUGH APRIL 15TH, OR AS DIRECTED BY THE OTY ENGINEER. 2. DURING RAINY SEASON ALL PAVED AREAS SHALL BE KEPT CLEAR Of EARTH MATERIAL AND OE8RIS. THE SIrE SHALL BE MAINTAINED
SO AS TO MINIMIZE SEDIMIENT-LAOEN RUNOFF TO ANY STORM DRAINAGE S'tSTEIJ. SANDBAG SEDIMENT INLET BARRIERS OR OTHER A?PRO'J'i:D BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICeS SHAlt. BE INSTALLED AT PLACES
ANTICIPATING SEOIMEIH-LAQEN RUNOfF TQ A PAVE[) J. ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES,(SILT FENCE. STRAW BALES. INLET PROTECTION. ETC.) MUST BE INSPECTED ANO REPAIRED AT THE
END Of EACH WORKING DAY DURING THE RAINY SEASON. 4. SILT F'ENCES SHALL BE CHECKED fOR ACCUI.lULATlON or SEDIMENT AmR E:.CH SlCNIACANT RAIN-f:'u.. SEOI"'ENi SHALL BE RmoVEO FROM BEHIND
THE SILT 'MiEN IT HAS ACCUMULATED. 5. Ai"TER EVERY STORM EVENT. SEDIMENT ACCUMULATEO BEHIND SAND8AGS ON Al.L PAW STREETS SHALL BE REMOVED AND INSPECTED fOR MAINTENANCE AND
REPAIRS. • 6. A STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE WAY" SHAU-8E INSTALLED PRIOR TO COMMENCWENT Of CFcADING. ALL CONSTRUCTION TRAFF'lC ENTERING THE PAVEO ROAD MUST CROSS TliE STAalLiZEO
CONSTRUCTION f:N1RANCE WAY. ANY MUD TRACKED ONTO PUBUC STREETS SHALL BE REMOVED THE SAME DAY AND AS REQUIRED BY THE CITY. M"ItlIfNANI":' YfAS!/RES , CONTROLS INSPECTION fREOUENCY MAINlENANCE/REPAIR
MEASURES Stabili<:ed l.Ianthly and After Each Ralnf<lll C<lnstructian Entratlce Replote gravel m<lteriol when voids are present Rem<lve <lll !:ledimet1t doeposit.e<:l on pave roadways
with 24 hours Remove QrQ',el at c;ompleUon 01 construction Silt F'encing Weoekl)' and Afler Eoch Roinfqll Repair whenevo::r fo::n.:e is damaged RemClve sediment when It reaches 1/3 the
height of the lenee especianyilheovyrains<lreeMpecled Storm Oroin Weeki)' and After Each Rainfoli Proteclian Replace cl<lgged filter f<lbric Immedlalely .Remove sediment ..hen
the depth eMceeds 2 :) the hei ht of the filter Remove actumulated debris Reerode an erOded orcas an berm Bas;" Weekly Qnd Alter Eoch Rainfall Remove
when the sediment staroge zane is half full RepairerosiQTIas necessOT)' UTlclOQ culle: Slro.... BQle Dike WeelJ)' ond After EQch RQintQ1! RepllJCe strow boles IhQI have decQmposed
or WhOM. bir.d;"g has broken Remove sediment behind the barrier when it reaches a de..th of 6 inches 126 Post Street , 3rd Floor San Francisco, CA 94108 T 415.775.8748 F 415.775.8752
L:::J JOB NO. A00034 PLANNING RESUBMITTAI. #4 12.D4.03 PLANNING RESUBMITTAl. #3 11.13.03
PO ZONING PO ZONING MODIACATION 2 03.25.04 EROSION CONTROL NOTES & DETAILS C4 LOS GATOS, CALIFORNIA SOBRATO DEVELOPMENT
COMPANIES LOS GATOS GATEWAY & WRIGHT • CIVIL nf,IIHRS &SlllVEYORS. INC. I JjjIJ x,II ..I...< 11 (4OOlm·EiOi 1x"loCll!IO, CrJlilc.rniG9)E!A W:{(OS)7li·554i m 4
I ". I I··....·..·.. .......... , (." . DEVELOPMENT COMPANIES OBRATO
JOB NO. A00034 SYMBOL r, L.J ---120 ! 80 PO ZONING MODIFICATION 2 03.25.G4 PlANNING RESUBMrTTAl..f14 12.04.03 PLANNINGRESUBMITTALII3 11.13.03 PLANNING RESUBMITTAL#2
09.19.03 PLANNING RESUBMITTAL 08.20.03 PO ZONING AMENOMENT OS.12.03 INLET PROTECTION eAS1NjTRENCH DRAIN) DETAIL CALlOUT PROPERTY ·UN!:: CENTERLINE STRAW DIKE STABIUZEO ENTRANCE
Scale "" 40 fl LEGEND DESCRIPTION o 40 C5 .r '-...;--PRELIMINARY EROSION CONTROL PLAN LOS GATOS, CALIFORNIA SOBRATO DEVELOPMENT COMPANIES
CA 94133 1'15<334671 ' KIER & WRIGHT • CIVil ENGIIHRS &SIllVEYORS, 1IIe. 3350S:otl &,ildin9 22 1<>,10 CI.., 9iiI\' fAl(108)11I-iM1
126 Post Street, 3rd Floor San Francisco, CA 94108 T 415.775.8748 F 415.775.8752 DEVELOPMENT COMPANIES OBRATO /)/
/---........ _, I //,/---7--I I , .. . ,./Application No. PD-04-4. A.P.N. # 424-32-068. Modification of approved Planned Development (Ordinance 2126). Recommended by Planning
Commission Approved by Town Council Date: _ Town Clerk Ma or Date: Ord: -----Exhibit A
I .lUbuu j\lUrUI Ut: ...../ILa DIVU. Suite 200 Cupertino, CA 95014-2075 April 8, 2004 Mr. Bud Lortz, Director Community Development Town of Los Gatos 110 East Main Street Los Gatos,
CA 95030 ...,.VO.'-t'+U.V I vU Facsimiie: 408.446.0583 www.sobrato.com RECEIVED APR 1 3 2004 TOWN OF LOS GATOS PLANNING DIVISION SOBRATO IDEVELOPMENT COMPANIES RE: 14300-14350 Winchester
Boulevard Letter of Justification for PD Zoning Modification Dear Mr. Lortz: We hereby request a modification to the existing Planned Development Zoning Ordinance. for the Los Gatos
Gateway project at 14300-14350 Winchester Boulevard. On January 20, 2004 the Town Council approved our Planned Development Zoning application for the mixed-use transit-oriented development
at 14300-14350 Winchester Boulevard. The approved project includes 120,000 square feet of Office/R&D and 290 rental homes, of which 51 homes are affordable. We are about to submit the
A&S submittal on the residential portion. Netflix, Inc. has asked the Town and Sobrato Development Development to increase the office portion of the development to accommodate their
future space planning needs. While we had hoped that the approved square footage of the office /R&D portion of the site would accommodate a growing Los Gatos company, we now know that
this very successful company requires 40,000 additional square feet. We have .studied how the approved project can be modified to accommodate the additional square footage and have found
that it caube done without negatively impacting the residential portion and while maintaining the original quality of design and excellent land plan. This is accomplished through a combination
of the following: increasing the footprint of the office buildings • significantly increasing the size of the underground garage reducing the Winchester entry driveway (pavement and
median landscape) • maintaining the landscaped courtyard between the buildings The resulting plan allows us to locate every additional parking space underground -not visible to the public
and not impacting the approved site plan. The integrity of the transitoriented development we have all worked so long to create is retained while providing a desirable campus to Netflix.
There are no environmental impacts associated with this additional area as there are less traffic trips generated and a lower on site population than the original project. Exhibit C
Letter. of Justification April 8, 2004 Page 2 The proposed modification to the existing PD Zoning and revised plans allows the Town and Sobrato to respond to Netflix's request in a way
that recognizes Netflix's value to the Town. The new plan is more supportive of mass transit (more potential riders) and Netflix's continued presence in Los Gatos will bolster the Town's'
finances (through substantial sales tax revenues and property taxes), provide many new jobs to the community, support the community through the increased sales at local retailers since
the Netflix employees will likely dine and shop in Town, and the intangible benefits of a Netflix corporate headquarters presence. Over the past several weeks, we have reviewed, analyzed
and modified our plans in a way that creates the opportunity to address Netflix's request and to further the Goals and Policies of the Town ofLos Gatos, the VTA, TaD standards, and further
improve the approved project while balancing our objectives. On behalf of Sobrato Development Companies I look forward to working with you on this exciting opportunity. Respectfully,
J1:mn\K.. Shenk Senior Vice President jshenk@sobrato.com
Wednesday, April 7, 2004 The Honorable Steve Glickman, Mayor Town of Los Gatos 110 East Main Street Los Gatos, CA 95032 Re: Netflix, Inc. and the Los Gatos Gateway Netflix Justification
Letter for Square Footage Increase Dear Mayor Glickman and Town Council Members: RECEIVED APR -9 2004 TOWN OF LOS GATOS PLANNING DIVISION Netflix is very pleased that the Town Council
is working with us and has agreed to accommodate our expedited requirement to secure our future headquarters location. As you are aware, Netflix has an agreement with Sobrato Development
Companies to lease the office buildings located at the Los Gatos'Gateway property on Winchester Boulevard. We are asking the Town Council for approval.of an additional 40,000 square
footage for our campus buildings, expanding the complex from the
original total of 120,000 square feet to 160,000 square feet. Our challenge, as we continue to grow, is the ability to provide enough contiguous office space for our burgeoning headcount
without resorting to a more distributed model. Diversifying our employee popUlation at this point in time would be detrimental to our business operations. We believe the additional 40,000
square feet will solve our office space dilemma and create a contiguous, harmonious office environment for our workforce at least until the year of 2012. Netflix desires to stay in the
Town of Los Gatos. We have grown up here and it is our preference to stay here. We believe we have provided for the Town in many ways, creating a symbiotic relationship where both the
Town and Netflix have benefited. One of the key benefits we provide to the Town is the sales tax revenue; tax dollars that have allowed the Town to contribute significantly to the Town's
ability to provide services to the residents of Los Gatos. Netflix employees also provide indirect_economic sustenance to the small businesses that populate the Town area by daily patronage
of the Los Gatos shops and restaurants. In summary, Netflix has a lot to offer the Town of Los Gatos, now and as we continue to grow, and we hope that the Town will quickly approve the
increase in the square footage of the Los Gatos Gateway Project and facilitate a smooth permitting process. We look forward to working with you and to a long mutually beneficial relationship.
Sincerely, J}{ ..['1-".--../Denise Helm Real Estate and Facilities Manager cc: Debra Figone, Town Manager Bud Lortz, Community Development Director Barry McCarthy,
Chief Financial Officer, Netflix, Inc.. David Hyman, General Counsel, Netflix, Inc. Exhibit D ,)70 University Avonn!! LOB Ga.tos, C/\ 1'honc 408.317.3700 Fax 408.317.3737
This element is a one-of-kind for the project Arched roof form seems out of place f .. .. .. IPolicy .. :.,./-:'--::-,":.
\ ---Should signage be placed .J. -,:c -If -c-'.,',:•.'.'_'_ - _ for viewing off-site? -,-:=; '"'" c.:; ';'" -Inl ' ------, Suggest keeping signage low ----I -,I I --and relying
on project entry sign North Elevation -Bldg. B Scale of entry seems rather large compared to tower entry Suggest lowering entry arch scale Check accuracy of drawings These elements same
width on floor plans, but very different on elevations West Elevation Site Plan LOS GATOS GATEWAY Comments Cannon Design Group March 29, 2004
A STREET ". " --0 (:0 S\ oQo \\\\I'.. -',-, .. \ ...... '< , .. - SCVWD CREEK MAINTENANCE YARD
\\
<? \o '------.. ..L?: Q)"::: cP' '\ ? '(Hl' A1< ij j' -cr ':> ;: 0 D.. I"\. e---\ ' \-« ? A STREET,-'
, f;lI I ! :::::: ,I::::: I I ' I PR OS . IN =t==t==L: POOL AREA (SEE LANDSCAPE PLAN)
PROPOSE -----..... '-tHfll'dL.-fJL.-..> J K-U"\. UVULll-tlr\',I.., I _, -__ - -----------------_____ ',C
I I 1==1===1===-1==1 c \\ ./\\\ SCVWOCREEK MA1NTENANCEYARD -
iF
Log of Council Chambers on 3/12/2004 Page 1 of 7 Description Town Council/Redevelopment Agency Sobrato/Netflix Study Session I Date 113/12/2004 II Location /I Council Chambers I I I
I Time II Speaker II Note I • 4;Q2:48 PM. IMayor Glickman !Opened study session I Big fan of Netflix and if it is possible to make this work he would like
to see it work. Understand that it will need to be a Paul DuBois compressed time frame and cautioned against doing anything illegal. Netflix is a Los Gatos born company, its doing well
and he would like to see it remain here. Can be a win win, but don't circumvent the planning process. I 4:06:07 PM I! Ray Davis IDisappointed that the pubiic is being shut out from commenting
after the discussion has taken place. I :4:09:24 PM IMayor IClosed pubiic comment period. Glickman I 4.;]B:3 Advised that the study session is merely for presentation of Debra
Figone the proposal and related issues and to make a decision on how to proceed. Align Town's process with doing the right thing. I PM IMayor IThanked staff for their efforts.
Glickman I Netflix' significant desire to stay in the Town is a huge compliment to the Town. Sobrato was asked to analyze the square footage and determine if the
required amount could be provided on the site. Not asked for in the beginning because of the parking. A two-level garage will be needed to provide adequate parking, and that is very
expensive. John Shenk Project from a volume, density, intensity, population and traffic generation standpoint is still less than the original project. Showed a site plan and explained
what changes would be made to enlarge the office buildings. Nothing will change from the drive aisle between the two uses to the creek. Main difference is at the entry. Parking garage
will be increased so surface parking does not increase. Showed compared site plans for proposal and original project. I 4:2J:.;24.EM IVice Mayor When should questions be asked. Mayor
Glickman clarified Wasserman that that questions should follow the presentation. 4:22:32 PM Netfix. With him is Denf'se Helm, facilities manager. Los Gatos is very special to Netflix
due to the diverse workforce. David Hyman The company needs more space. Have not been able to find a place to accommodate their growth. Along with revenue growth comes aneed to increase
workforce. Need fi ]P' IIF·\FTR OJ,,?m,cw%%?orrn·m1)\Fillfl1\Town%20C:oullCi1%20 Exhibit G
Log of Council Chambers on 3/12/2004 Page20f7 to find a location that will accommodate 5-10 year anticipated growth. Would love to stay in Los Gatos. It fits the culture of the company
well. ...P.M Vice Mayor Questions about Netflix: What is rationale for committing to such significant tenant improvements with only a five year Wasserman lease? �
� Part of it is to retain flexibility. Have seen companies enter David Hyman into long term leases and be locked in when they want to move for some reason. 4.:.2LitQ£.M Is 11-12
milion tenant improvemts for both buildings (yes). How large is spcae now (30,000 sq. ft.). Is use of both existing and Sobrato facilities possible (separating groups is Vice Mayor not
optimc;ll situation). How firm is the 160,000 sq. ft. (only Wasserman recently did a detailed study of needs and determined space plan). Given projections for next five years, at what
point would company 0(160,000 would suffice until 2012; 120,000 sq. ft. takes them to 2008). M Projection beyond 2012? (looking out that far is difficult because
do not know exactly how well the business will do; difficult to accurately forecast). If you reach 2012 and facility is full,Would you consider occupying another property in the more
immediate area such as the adjacent property (haven't thought past that). If you are envisioning the occupancy of Councilmember 80,000 and adjacent buildings that may become available,
Pirzynski would that distance be within the framework of creating a campus atmosphere (Probably not -one of the reasons we like the Sobrato building is the outdoor space that will be
provided; crossing a street or going down the street would not be optimal. Would like to have a campus environment that will accommodate growth for next five years. Looking for a more
cohesive design). AQ.PM. Love the company. Would like to reiterate that the Town of Councilmember Los Gatos is very special. You are asking a great deal to Decker circumvent
the process of the Town. Ask that Netflix take a good look at the property and the opportunity to create an exceptional campus. Rental housing behind.
Certainly don't want to impose on the Council. Currently bursting at the seams and are working on space issues. David Hyman The space is not what some of the work force would like it
to be. The lead time of the construction and the existing lease are restricting options. I .':t:.45 ICouncilmember Hearing that you would be willing to take the time to go
Decker through our process, four to six months. 4::46:J.9.£M Four to six months is a problem. Were on the verge of going David Hyman elsewhere when the Sobrato project gained approved.
From a timing standpoint six months would be a problem. Will go file://F:\FTR %2OT l\Town%?OColl11r.i
1%7.0S... 04/()/o(/?004
Log of Council Chambers on 3/12/2004 Page 3 of7 I I Iback and look at interim and can work from there. I I ICouncilmember That covered some of what
she wanted to talk about. McNutt Wanted to know about the need for speed. 4:48.:,QJ...P.M When you go back and look at the situation, consider two different size buildings, perhaps one
that is 80,000 and one Vice Mayor that is 40,000. Consider Councilmember Pirzynski's Wasserman suggestion of possibly using buildings on the adjacent site. We want Netflix. Have the
opportunity to work together and create an internationally recognizable project. Cost to company to make interim arrangements (economic David Hyman considerations).
willing to work with Town, but need to move as quickly as possible. Time to construct and occupy? (15-18 months) We very much want Netflix to stay in Los Gatos.
When we looked at 30 days it was very challenging. We have a Mayor process and can make 'it it work expiditiously as possible. Glickman Understand that our normal process might be more
than. you can accommodate. It is indeed a process of underste;mding each others needs. question of Mr. Shenk on time lines. 4:55:39 PM Looking at the site as a whole, we proposed to
phase with the residential portion being phase one and the two office buildings being phases two and three. The intention was to break ground before the end of the year and there was
no time frame on the offices as we had no tenant. Being optomistic, 15-18 months to complete the project. Constructing the underground garage and podium adds John Shenk time. Anticipating
submittal of the A&S application in a week and a half. If Netflix is agreeable and wants the buildings, anticipate breaking ground about 60 days from approval. The critical path is construction
of the garage. The applications would start overlapping. Residential project would begin later in the year. If both buildings were built at the same time it would take about the same
same time to construct. Asked about original project and revised plan (current Vice Mayor approval) and the lower density and building volume. Why Wasserman
increase the office buildings without reducing the residential? 5:02:40 PM Don't look at square footage equals density. On-site population and traffic generation are still lower. A future
light rail stop is a good thing. If we can provide more housing, John Shenk more affordable housing and accommodate Netflic, that is a good thing. Have invested a lot of time and money
into the residential plan and going back and redesigning would open Pandora's box. I II II I IIF'\FTR %?.OT
%?O(Drrlft)\Finrll\ ()4IOR/2()04
Log of Council Chambers on 3/12/2004 Page 4 of7 I IVice ,Mayor Trying to get back to what you said was a better project. Wasserman It dramatically
affects the economics of the deal. Especially if we don't touch the garage, which is very expensive and John Shenk would affect the cost per unit. Wasserman suggested eliminating a building
and a "less profitable" component (residential) to balance the project. John Shenk said there are a lot more considerations that go into it. 5: 10:50 F:'M Appreciating the fact that
this is something that goes beyond numbers. Visual and traffic impacts are big issues. His recollection was that Council wanted the housing. Councilmember Opposed to reducing the numbers.
Based on discussion, Pirzynski have gained something -more flexibility with regards to timing. Need to careful to assess the risks that are involved With extending the process beyond
a reasonable time frame. Need to start talking about the impacts and whether the proposal is is a significant change. I IMayor Will we get some input from staff
on the process. Glickman 5:17:22 PM Sobrato is walking away with 40,000 square feet free. What we are looking at is the impacts. The impact of adding to the Councilmember front building
results in a loss of open space. We're still Decker trying to keep a livable environment for the people living there. Asking you to reduce the residential by one building to ,minimize
the impacts. I 5:20:07 PM IMayor What we need to know to act on this are the impacts due to Glickman the proposal. I _5:21 :24 PM II David Hyman II Question on process. I I ;5:22;1.QJ?M
IMayor IClarify impacts, . Glickman I p:22.;.2Q_PM Have run traffic numbers. Misconception that the 40,000 JohnShenk square feet is free. 8uilding the garage is more expensive that buying
land. Paying more than market price. Clarified population. I 5: ICouncilmember Referring to number of employees noted by Netflix. Decker Mayor
Glickman We do have information prepared by staff: 5:24:55 PM Want to make it clear that as we go into the next phase of Councilmember this process that we only define if an impact/increase
is Pirzynski significant. Need to determine the impacts on the community. I ;5_:2Z:J_Q_PM Ilvice Chair IWould prefer that the entire project was housing, Not looking to eliminate housing,
but trying to balance this. file://F:\FTR %201 .og-%20Sheets\TownC:ouncil%20rDraft)\Final\Town%20C:oullcil%20S... 04/OR/2()()4
Log of CouJ;lcil Chambers on 3/12/2004 . Page 5 of7 I II Wasserman IAccommodate Los Gatos company while not overburdening the property. I 5.; 2.B..; 0_9..EM ICouncilmember Would like
to clarify what is to be accomplished at this study McNutt session. 15:29:09 PM IMayor One of the things is to take into account the physical parameters. Can now look at the process
and direction to Glickman staff. .5._:2.9..;.4_9..EM Here to ascertain if Council wants staff to accommodate Debra Figone request for added square footage. Asked Town Attorney to talk
about process and Director of Community Development to comment on any difficulties associated with that. I 5:31:06 PM I Mayor Need to know what is involved with the process. Glickman
.5:31 :21E_M We have a PD that was approved through Town process and as defined by state law. That PO process is a rezoning. That process includes two public hearings with required notice.
First heard by Planning Commission and recommendation made to Council which holds hearing and makes a a decision. Each public hearing requires at least a 10 day notice. Meeting for PC
to approve its minuts could Orry Korb be a special meeting. Discussed process of staff analysis of submitted information and environmental process (Addendum to EIR). There are some variables
that can't be controlled such as Planning Commission reaching a decision in one meeting. The only other option is to consider the magnitude of the proposed modification. Provision in
Town Code allowing minor changes to be approved at DRC level. Up to Council to determine if modification is minor. 5:37..;.38 PM Best case scenario, if we were to show good faith, and
to. work cooperatively with Pl'anning Commission, what is the Councilmember time line? Modification from his persepctive is not changing Pirzynski the residential. Changing the building
footprints and garage. Limit discussion to alterations being proposed. Changes in the proposal are contained. 5:39:44 PM Defer to staff on process. Legal requirements are to notice public
hearings. Barring any processing issues that staff Orry Korb needs to consider, would probably be in early April. Not saying that thats the ideal timing or that staff can get everything
done. Answering questions in the normal contect of the process. 5:41:42 PM Does time line consider applicant's submittal time? Vice Mayor Responses by Councilmember Pirzynski and Mr.
Korb. Wasserman Further clarification on the length of time for applicant to prepare submittal. I II IChallenge for staff. Easier to look at deadline and work
from file://F:\FTR%20LoQ:%20Sheets\TownCounciI%20(Drafn\Final\Town%20l:ouncilOfr,20S... 041OR/2004
Log of Council Chambers on 3/12/2004 Page 6 of7 there. We can turn it around in 60 days. The one thing that is unknown is the Planning Commission review. Council could direct the review
to remain on the office component Bud Lortz but could lose the 60 day turnaround if the Commission decides to go into other areas of interest. Staff is here to do whatever the Council
would like and will do whatever it takes. Can compress. Sobrato's team is working around the clock. 1546:27 PM 1Councilmember Clarification on minor revision being reviewed by DRC, does
McNutt Council have the ability to modify and require it to come to us (yes) QALQ3 PM Need to be special meetings to accommodate this. Appreciate the concern about the lack of control
with the Councilmember standard process. Planning Commissioners who are Pirzynski working on our behalf will be sensitive to Council's request that we work as quickly as possible whether
it be an up or down vote. This is not an unfamiliar preoject to any of us. Councilmember Agree with Mr. Pirzynski completely. One question for Mr. Decker Hyman
on process: what real security do we have that once the dust has settled Netflix will take that building? 5:50:10 PM No signed letter of intent. The way I'd express our David Hyman committl1lent
is the time we have spent on this. Would rather be spending time on work. Have a good faith effort to move"forvvard with Town. 5:51 :23 PM Councilmember We're doing all we Can. Mr. Hyman:
if 60 days from now this Decker is still in the process, even a signed letter of intent would not stop us from looking elsewhere. 5:52:31 PM Vice Mayor Signed letter of intent contingent
on Town approval. Wasserman Response by Mr. Hyman. 5:54:04 PM Have been moving so quickly, don't have a formql number in front of them. There is a willingness on our part to not John
Shenk move forward with the expanded project if Netflix backs out. OK with approval being contingent on Netflix occupying the project. Mr. Hyman said that if the Town Council comes through
Netflix will stay. 5:57:58 PM Clarified that Council is committing to an expedited process. Councilmember Our good faith is that you will have a decision within the McNutt specified
time frame, not that it will be approved. Very much appreciate having a letter from Sobrato that if Netflix doesn't occupy, they wonit hang onto the square footage. g:QJ):0LE'M Concur
with what most of my council members have said. It Mayor is encumbent on us to talk about whether this could go Glickman through the minor process. If the answer is no, we should go
through the process involving the Planning Commission. I 6PM Ilvice Mayor ISupports expedited Planning Commission process. Process file://F:\FTR%20Lo,g%20Sheets\TownCouncil%20(Draft
)\Final\Town%20Council%20S... 04/08/2004
Log of Chambers on 3/12/2004 Page 7 of7 I II Wasserman II needs to be respected. I 16._:_0.2..._:.0. _5....P_._M_.-ICouncilmember Do get a sense that this is a minor
change, but the public McNutt perception is that it is not minor. Should go through the normal process. I 6:03:12 PM I Councilmember Concur. Pirzynski and Glickman also concurred. ..."•••••••
_ ••••m. ___ Decker [ 6:03:41 PM IMayor Speaking to the Planning Commission, this is an issue of Glickman vital important to the Town and we all need to make a good faith effort to move
this forward as quickly as possible. Asked if Council could direct the Commission to focus its review on the office component, entrance and parking Bud Lortz garage.
Council agreed. Mr. Lortz noted that this is a condensed process and trying to generate information will be difficult. This will be our highest priority and some other projects may need
to 6:Q_6:3QI_M Cost recovery? Mr. Lortz said there is, and there will be. Vice Mayor This is is a signficant expenditure of money and effort on both Wasserman our side and their side.
Clearly this is a premier economic vitality project for the Town. I 6:08:05 PM IMayor the level of effort that will be required of staff, the Ie•. Glickman Commission
and the Council. Closed study session. I--Produced by FTR Log Notes™ www.ftrgold.com file:!IF :\FTR%20Log%20Sheets\TovvnCouncil%20(Draft)\Final\Town%20Coul1cil%20S... 04/08/2004
Addendum II to the Impact Report Vasona Research Park! Los Gatos Gateway (PD-04-4) 14300 & 14350 Winchester Boulevard April 2004 Prepared for Town of Los Gatos
Community Development Department Prepared by Geier & Geier Consulting, Inc. P.O. Box 5054 Berkeley, CA 94705-5054 (510) 644-2535 EXHIBIT H
Table of Contents Chapter 11 Addendum to the EIR 11.1 Introduction 11.2 Background 11.3 Changes to the Approved Project 11.4 Comparison of Impacts Identified in the FEIR, Adopted EIR
Addendum, and EIR Addendum II Chapter 12 Appendices AppendixI Site PIan Review Vasona Research Park/Los Gatos Gateway EIR 11-1 11-1 11-2 11-3 11-6 April 2004
Chapter 11 EIR Addendum II 11.1 Introduction On February 4, 2002, the Los Gatos Town Council certified the Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) and Mitigation Monitoring Plan (MMP)
as complete. The Council also approved a planned development zoning application, which allowed development of 288,000 square feet (sJ.) of R&D/office space and 135 apartments (referred
to as the revised R&D+Housing Alternative in the FEIR) on the 12.28-acre project site. Of the 135 apartments, 34 units are affordable units. On August 14, 2002, the Town approved the
Architecture and Site application for the approved project. The Tentative Map application was approved by the Town's Development Review Committee on September 17, 2002. The approved
project is referred to as the "2002 Project" in this report. The approved project was known as the "Vasona Research Park" in the Draft EIR (DEIR) and FEIR, but is referred to as the
"Los Gatos Gateway" project in the adopted EIR Addendum and this EIR Addendum. In October 2003, the project applicant requested approval to modify the previously-approved project by
reducing the R&D/office component and increasing the housing component. The modified project included 120,000 s.f. of R&D/office space and 295 apartments (246 market rate and 49 below
market price units). The Town Council approved the modified project (but with 290 apartments, comprised of 239 market rate and 51 below market price units) and accepted the Addendum
on January 20, 2004. This approved project is referred to as the "2004 Project" in this report. In March 2004, the project applicant requested approval to again modify the �
� project. The proposed change is in response to changing market conditions and would increase the R&D/office component while keeping the housing component the same as approved
in 2004. The R&D/office component is proposed to increase to 160,000 s.f., which is smaller than the first approved project but larger than the second approved project. This proposal
is referred referred to as the "Proposed Modified Project" in this report. CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 specifies that when an EIR already has been certified, no subsequent or supplemental
EIR shall be prepared unless the Town determines, on the basis of substantial evidence in light of the whole record (Draft and Final EIRs), that: (1) substantial changes in the project
are proposed that would result in new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously-identified significant effects; (2) substantial changes
occur in the circumstances under which the project is undertaken; or (3) new information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known at the time the
previous EIR was certified as complete. The impact analysis in this report indicates that the proposed modified project would not result in any new significant . environmental effects
nor would there be a substantial increase in the severity of impacts identified in the certified EIR. The impact analysis also indicates that there have not been substantial changes
in project circumstances nor has any new significant information been revealed. Therefore, a Subsequent or Supplemental EIR was not required. 11-1 Vasona Research Park./Los Gatos Gateway
EIR April 2004
Chapter 11 EIR Addendum II In October 2003, the applicant submitted a modified project design that reduced the R&D/office component of the project (from 288,000 to 120,000 sJ.) and increased
the residential component (from 135 to 295 apartments).' In January 2004, the modified project was approved, allowing for 120,000 s.f. of R&D/office space and 290 apartments (2004 Project).
11.3 Changes to the Approved Project When compared to the 2002 project, the proposed modified project would reduce the R&D/office component of the project by 128,000 s.f., while the
residential component would increase by 155 units (from 135 un.its to 290 units). The proposed project would modify the Planned Development that was approved in 2002 (allowing 288,000
s.f. of R&D/office space and 135 apartments) by allowing development of 160,000 s.f. of R&D/office space and 290 apartments. The' proposed total building footprint area would be reduced
by approximately 21,844 s.f. (from 177,595 d. to 155,751 sJ.), while paved areas (asphalt asphalt and pavers) would decrease by 14;372 sJ. (from 136,454 to 122,082 s.f.). Landscape/hardscape
areas (landscaping, walkways and residential cor;ridors) would increase by 36,126 sJ. (from 220,911 s.f. to 257,117 s.f.). The proposed modified project also would increase the number
of below market price (BMP) units by 24 units (from 27 to 51 units). When compared to the 2004 project, the proposed modified project's R&D/office component would have 40,000 more square
feet, while the residential component would reml;l.in the same. The project applicant proposes to modify the Planned Development that was approved in 2004 (allowing 120,000 sJ. of R&D/office
space and 290 apartments) to allow development of 160,000 sJ. of R&D/office space and 290 apartments. The proposed addition of 40,000 s.f. of R&D/office space would increase total building
footprint area by approximately 5,660 sJ. (from 150,091 sJ. to 155,751 sJ.), while decreasing paved and landscaped areas by the same amount. The proposed modified project project would
maintain the same number of BMP,units (51 units). The modified site plan is presented as Figure 11-1. The residential component (building layout and designs) that was approved in January
2004 would remain the same. A comparison of the approved 2002 and 2004 Planned Developments to the currently proposed modified Planned Development is presented in Table 11-1. Under the
proposed modified project, there would still be two R&D/office buildings, but the footprint of both buildings would be approximately 54 percent smaller than the 2002 project and 12 percent
larger than the 2004 project. As with the 2002 and 2004 projects, these two buildings would still front on Winchester Boulevard and be three stories high with maximum heights remaining
at 49.5 feet. 11-3 Vasona Research Park/Los Gatos Gateway EIR Apri/2004
Chapter]] EIR Addendum II Table 11-1 Summary of Site and Area Tabulations Site Coverage Proposed Modified Project 534,950 s.f. ,_"",_,,,,,,...
160,000 s,f. 290 units .._.
29,9% 2002 Site 2004 Site Approved Project Coverage Approved Project Coverage· 534,950 sJ. 534,950 s.f. __.,,_,,__.",_,,_,, ,,__
"_",,. Site Coverage 20.4% Existing Condition 109,289 s.f. 288,000 s,f. 120,000 s,f. 135 units 290 units '"'''''''--'''''''''''''-''-'''''''''''---''''''' ".",,""'"'''' (?..:,?."�
� __ 22.4% Site Area 534,950 sJ, I Site �
� Building Area: R&D/Office (s.f.) Residential R&D Floor Area Ratio 29.1% Building Footprint Area: Total
109,289 s.f. 20.4% 177,595 sJ. 33.2% 150,091 s.f. 28.1% 155,751 s.f. R&D/Office 120,030 s.f. 49,200 s.f. 54,860 s.f. __.,,_,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
,,.,,,,,,.,,,,,_,,,,,._""",, , _,,, ,__,,__..__." __.". ."_,, ,,, __,, s.f.. __ "_""",.",,,,,,,
__._. Paving Area __
.. __"""____ __�
�
__ __, __
. 100% 100% 100% Total Parking Spaces At Grade Parking Provided , Shared 1,146 921 1,085
342 spaces 252 spaces 250 spaces "" ,_, .. __",,,,__ ,,.,,,,,_",".__""_.__ __"_""_,,,,__,,,,._",,
34 90 66 CM Zone Residential Parking Ratios R&D/Office 902 396 560 (3.13/1,000 g,s,f.) (3.30/1,000 g.sJ.) (3.50/1,000 g.sJ.) 244 525 525 ,"""""""""""""".,,,..
..,,.,,....,,,,,,,,,.,, ,.."",,,,,,,,,,,,,.,,,,,.,,, ""......_"..."",,,,,,,_,,,,,,,,_.,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,.,,,,,,,,,,,, "."",,,._,,,,,,,,,,,,_,,,,,,,,,.,_,,,,,,,,_,.,,,,,,,,,, (.!:,,?,,!{'!..!!i.,!),,,,,
"._"_,...;"__"_""_",,,., ,,,,__.. _,,.,,,,,,. __ ,,_,,__ ,, ,_'" 35 feet Max. Building Height
Office Buildings 49,5 ft. 49.5 feet 49.5 feet Apartment Buildings 41 feet 41 feet 41 feet Source: Kenneth Rodrigues & Partners, Inc. (11/15/01) for 2002 project; Forrn4 Architecture
(8/20/03) for 20q4 project and (3/25/04) for proposed modified project. I sJ, = square feet 2 Of the total number of garage parking spaces, 368 spaces would be in the office garage while
40 I spaces would be in the residential garage, 11-5 VaSOl/a Research Park/Los Gatos Gateway EIR April 2004
Chapter '11 Table 11-2 Summary of Impacts Identified in the Certified Final EIR, Adopted EIR Addendum, and EIR Addendum II EIR Addendum II Impacts and Mitigation Measures Iden.tified
for Impacts and Mitigation Measures Identified Impacts and Mitigation Measures Identified the 2002 FEIRIApproved Project in Certified for the 2004 Approved Project in Adopted for the
Proposed Modified Project in EIR FinalEIR EIR Addendum Addendumll Land Use ..........._.._----..._-------_..._-----..-.._-_._-Impact 4.1-1: The project would alter former and existing
Same as 2002 project. Types of uses and general Same as 2002 and 2004 projects. Types of uses and land uses on the site. (Less than Significant) distributions would remain the same.
general distributions would remain the same. ..._-----------_._. _._----------Mitigation Measure 4-1: None required. Same as 2002 project. Same as 2002 and 2004 projects. ......_-_.__..--Impact
4.1-2: The project could affect planned transit Same as 2002 project. The VTA indicated a Same as 2002 and 2004 projects. The VTA uses adjacent to the site. (Less than Significant) preference
for high-density housing or a mixed-use indicated a preference for high-density housing or a project on the site. mixed-use project on the site. .........._.......--Mitigation Measure
4-2: None required. Same as 2002 project. Same as 2002 and 2004 projects. ....._.._.._-----------....... Aesthetics .........._.._.._-_.__._....._.... -_._---_........._._._---_.......-._------------
--_.._-Impact 4.2-1: The project would block distant views of Same as 2002 project. Along Winchester Boulevard, Same as 2002 and 2004 projects. Views of the the Santa Cruz Mountains.
(Less than Significant) the R&D/office buildings would be similar in height proposed modified project would be similar to but the footprint would be significantly smaller views
of the 2004 project. Therefore, the the approved project. In the center of the site, comparison of the 2004 project to the 2002 project overall building height would decrease since the
in the adopted EIR Addendum would also represent R&D/office buildings (49.5 feet high) would be a comparison of the proposed modified project to replaced with apartment buildings (maximum
41 the 2002 project. From Winchester, the two R&D/feet high). Apartment buildings would be closer to . office buildings would appear similar in setback the Los Gatos Creek trail at some
locations and and height, but mass would be slightly greater since farther away at others. When building heights, mass, building footprint would be larger and second and and setbacks
are considered together, the net effect third floors would be stepped back less along the would be that views, on the whole, from the Los . western Views of the residential
buildings Gatos Creek Trail would not change significantly. would remain the same as the 2004 project since the residential component would be the same. ..............................................
....__........_.._......... ....._._--_...._..._.._.._.-... -Mitigation Measure 4.2-1: None required. Same as 2002 project. Same as 2002 and 2004
projects. .............................._......._......._.....••.._......._..... ...........N._._......_____.._._·___·_··_ ..........N······_.._·_····_·_·..·_·····__·_·__··__· _.___._..__.___._______
-----------11-7 Vasolla Research Park/Los Gatos Gateway EIR April 2004
Chapter 11 Table 11-2 (Cont'd) Summary of Impacts Identified in the Certified Final EIR, Adopted EIR Addendum, and EIR Addendum II EIR Addendum II Impacts and Mitigation Measures Identified
for the 2002 FEIRIApproved Project in Certified . Final EIR Impact 4.3-2: The project would be subject to differential settlement in the area previously containing the UST. Undocumented
fill material deposited in this area could result in property damage over the life of the project. (Potentially Significant) Mitigation Measure 4.3-2: Since the undocumentedfill associated
with the removal ofthe USTextends well below anticipated basementfootings, thefill would need to be completely removed and replaced as engineeredfill in order to minimize differential
settlement and possible damage to the building. In addition, the sheetpiles, which were left in place, will need to be cut and removed during the excavation activities. Residual Significance:
Less than Significant. 4.3-3: The project could be subject to inundation due to dam failure. (Less than Significant) Impacts and Mitigation Measures Identified for the 2004
Approved Project in Adopted EIR Addendum . Same as 2002 project since project buildings would have the same general footprint. Same as 2002 project. Same as 2002 project since project
buildings would have the same general footprint. Impacts and Mitigation Measures Identified for the Proposed Modified Project in EIR Addendum II Same as 2002 and 2004 projects
project buildings would have the same general footprint. Same as 2002 and 2004 projects. Same as 2002 and 2004 projects since project buildings would have the same general footprint.
, ,_, ' "....................................... . , " , ,_ , . _ , _................ . _ ,.._ _ _.,_ _ __. .__ , __ _•.. ..__ _ _ .._..___ , _ _. ._.._._..
__ , . _ __.. .._N_._. •. . .. . _ _..,_.._ _ _-" _ ,..__..,-_..__._,._ _.__ .. _--""_ _
_._----,_.._-_..,--_._.__ __.., _--_.._._.._.. .._._._.._._.._,_.._-,..__ Mitigation Measure 4.3-3: None required. Same as 2002 project. Same as 2002
and 2004 projects. Hydrology and Water Quality " ,_ -, ,-,.._, _.__._-, -..-_ _._ __ -..__.--"-'''''-''''-__ _ __._ .. _ ____
•...__.__ . Impact 4.4-1: The project would incrementally increase sUlface runoff from impervious· surfaces from additional impervious surfaces constructed as part
of the proposed redevelopment. (Less than Significant) Less impact since less impervious surfaces than 2002 project. The project includes stormwater detention facilities to limit post-development
runoff to pre-development levels. Less impervious surfaces than the 2002 project and slightly more than the 2004 project. Like the 2002 and 2004 projects, proposed stormwater detention
facilities would mitigate this impact to a less-thansignificant level. ........_ _ _ _ __ ..-__ __--..-_ _ __ __._..:.. _._ -_ _-_ _ __ __.._ _._ _ _--.._----_
___._._-. Mitigation Measures 4.4-1: None required. Same as 2002 project. Same as 2002 and 2004 projects. ..........., ,.... .. . , --__ __ ' , _ ,..-._.._--_ _ _.._.._._ _..---_
_ __ -_ __ -__ -.._.__ __..-_.-_.._ -_ ,_ _ _ __.._ __ -Vasolla Research Park/Los Gatos Gateway EIR April 2004
Chapter 11 EIR Addendum II Table 11-2 (Cont'd) Summary of Impacts Identified in the Certified Final EIR, Adopted EIR Addendum, and EIR Addendum II ------------_._--. _..__.._._..._....._._._--------L
ess than the 2002 project since it would generate fewer trips than the 2002 project. Like the 2002 project, impacts on intersections in the Town of Los Gatos, City of Campbell, and CMP
intersections would be less than significant. ,-------_.__.__._-_._--Traffic and Circulation --_._._...._--_..•-_..-ImpaCt 4.5-1: The project would result in traffic increases at local
intersections and incrementally degrade level of service operation at these intersections. (Less than Significant) Mitigation Measure 4.5-3: Recommendations relate to the design ofthe
Winchester Boulevard/site driveway intersection, pedestrian and bicycle access, a new bus stop, existing fiber optic cable facilities along the ....�
� .. a.. __.._._ ___..__
. . . . ..__ _ .. --' Less than the 2002 project but more than the 2004 project, since it would generate fewer trips than the 2002 project and more trips than the 2004 project. Like
the 2002 and 2004 projects, impacts on intersections in the Town of Los Gatos, City of Campbell, and CMP intersections would be less than significant. _··_--_·_--------1 ...
None required. Same as 2002 project. Same as 2002 and 2004 proj,ects. ._-----._---------_._.._-_..-...._-----j Impact 4.5-2: The project would result in
traffic Less than the 2002 project since it would generate Like the 2002 and 2004 projects, impacts on local increases on local freeway segments. (Less than fewer trips than the 2002
project and impacts on freeway segments would be less than significant. .. _.. .__.__._. _.._.._._.______ freeways be less than
1 ._. . _ Mitigation Measure 4.5-2: None required. Same as 2002 project. Same as 2002 and 2004 projects. ....._.__ __ -_---------..----------_._-----..-------_-_.._ _--_._---------Impact
4.5-3: At this stage of project planning design Same as the 2002 project. Two proposed access Design details more similar to the 2004 project details have not been finalized for vehicular,
pedestrian, driveways would still be adequate for the project, than the 2002 project. Vehicular and pedestrian and bicycle access at railroad crossings and access pedestrian access to
the creek trail is available at access locations would be the same as the 2004 intersections. Such design details will be reviewed as two locations, pedestrian access will be provided
to project. Like the 2002 and 2004 projects, a bus stop part of Architecture and Site review, although the Town the LRT station, shopping center at Knowles and may not be feasible on
Winchester Boulevard at the will require provision of adequate ingress and egress for Winchester, and along A Street. Like the 2002 project site driveway intersection. However, the project
vehicles, and bicycles. project, a bus stop may not be feasible on bus stop could be included as part of the Impact 4.5-4: At this stage of project planning, design
Winchester Boulevard. The modified project's intersection modification but would require details are not yet available for truck access and smaller scale R&D/office component
could have Caltrans and VTA approval. Such design details circulation. Such design details will be reviewed as part less truck delivery requirements. Such design details will be reviewed
as part of the Town's Architecture of the Town's Architecture and Site review process. will be reviewed as part of the Town's Architecture and Site review process. and Sitereview process.
__·_--·-·_·_-------I EIR recommendations (which include those made by EIR recommendations ((which include those made VTA) have
been updated to reflect the current plan. by VTA) have been updated to reflect the current plan. 11-11 Vasona Research Park/Los Gatos Gateway EIR Apri/2004
Chapter 11 Table 11-2 (Cont'd) Summary of Impacts Identified in the Certified Final EIR, Adopted EIR Addendum, and EIR Addendum II EIR Addendum II Same as the 2002 and 2004 projects.
Impact 4.6-2: Mobile emissions generated by project-Less than the 2002 project. Since the 2004 project Less than the 2002 project. Since the proposed related traffic would increase regional
vehicular would generate lower traffic levels than the 2002 modified project would generate lower traffic· emissions as well as localized carbon monoxide project, regional and local
emissions associated with levels than the 2002 project, regional and local concentrations at intersections in the project vicinity. the 2004 project also would be less than significant.
emissions associated with the proposed project also _._ _...... ............... . _ . ..._ .."_ ,__",__ "_......,. ,,,,,
. w_ou_ld_..--be le_s_s than sig.nifi_cant_.... . __.._-_._.._ _ . ... ..�
� _...... Same as 2002 pro;..
_ _ _ _ . Impact 4.6-3: Mobile emissions generated by project-Like the 2002 project, cumulative impacts under the Since the proposed modified project would related traffic in addition
to other proposed projects 2004 modified project would be less than generate less traffic than the 2002 project but more would cumulatively increase localized carbon monoxide significant.
traffic than the 2004 project, it is anticipated that concentrations at intersections in the project vicinity. the projected cumulative emissions (with project) (Less.than Significant)
would be' in between projected emissions for the 2002 and 2004 projects, which were both ............. _.._.................. .. ........_ _ __._......... _._ .._ _ _ _._ _..
_._ _.__ ..............._._..........§E.'!Jf!.ES.?Qg?...P!J!il!EL _ __ _._ _. ....§!!'!J!....!!.
.s. ?Q...9Xf!:.'!:4..?Q!H..P..!.()je..E!S.: _...._ _ _.._ .. Impact 4.7-1: Project construction would result in temporary short-term noise increases due to the operation
.. .. .. __ . _.._ _ _. _ _ -_ ..--------.---.
. !!...q,'!f!.t!!.q':!.i.!..fl4:........ __ .
__ _ _ _ _ __§!!'!!fl!!..s......?.Q.Q.?...f!.'!..4...?..QQ.i..P!f!..lflc:t.S.:..._ _.._ _ _. 'Impact 4.7-2: Traffic increases on Winchester Boulevard Less than
the 2002 project. With lower traffic levels Less than the 2002 project but more than the 2004 due to the project would increase noise levels along these than the 2002 project, project-related
and project, since it would generate fewer trips than the roads. (Less than Significant) cumulative traffiC noise increases would also be 2002 project and more trips than the 2004 project.
proportionately less. Like the 2002 project, this Like the 2002 and 2004 projects, project-related impact would be less than significant. and cumulative traffic noise increases would
be ...................................................... . __ _ _ _ _ _ _..__.._ _ _.__ _ __ _..__ __ ._ "__._ _ __ _..__ _
__ ..__. _ . !'ii.t.i.8/!..
..P..T..q,Le..Et.:...._ _.. _.__ .._ _ .. __ .. I ..
.. __..-..-_.__ 1 Impact 4.7-3: Proposed R&D/office and residential uses Same as the 2002 project, but more residential units Same as
the 2004 project since the residential would be subject to traffic noise from the SR 85 freeway would be exposed to freeway noise. Like the 2002 component would be the same. and Winchester
Boulevard. (Less than Significant) project, the applicant will incorporate necessary design measures to meet State guidelines and standards. M'ti' (-M" ed.·.·.·..·.·
.·.·.·.·.· ..2002·:.-::....=: ·..--..--..---------....----..
.. . . ....:...!!.t.r....:.. 11-13 Vasol/a Research Park/Los Gatos
Gateway ElR April 2
004Chapter 11 EIR Addendum II The General Plan already designates High Density Residential use on the northern portion of the site. The High Density Residential designation allows densities
of 12 to 20 units per acre. The calculated density of the residential portion of the project is 20 units per acre,I which conforms to the General Plan. Impact 4.1-1: The project would
alter former and existing land uses on the site. (2002 Project, 2004 Project and Proposed Modified Project: Less than Significant) Under the proposed modified project, the types of proposed
uses (R&D/office and residential) would remain the same as the 2002 and 2004 projects, and the general distribution of these uses on the site would also remain the same (R&D/office uses
on the western portion and residential uses on the eastern portion of the< site). Therefore, these less-than-significant impacts would remain the same as the 2002 and 2004 projects,
and the DEIR discussion would still apply to the proposed modified project. Compared to the 2002 project, the proposed modified project would have smaller building setbacks from the
South Bay Office Park to the north and larger building setbacks from the SCVWD property and State Route 85 freeway. Compared to the 2004 project, the modified project would have even
smaller building setbacks from the South Bay Office Park to the north (minimum setback would decrease from 75 feet to 60 feet from the property boundary). In additioI1, the modified
project would reduce the minimum building setback from the SCVWD property and State Route 85 freeway (decreasing from 160 feet under the 2004 project to 105 feet from the southern property
boundary). Compatibility issues associated with the change in proximity of project buildings to adjacent uses are discussed below under Aesthetics and Noise. Impact 4.1-2: The project
could affect planned transit uses adjacent to the site. (2002 Project, 2004 Project, and Proposed Modified Project: Less than Significant) In 2000, the Santa Clara Valley Transportation
Authority reviewed the 2002 project plans for consistency with planned light rail facilities. The VTA indicated a preference for high-density housing or a mixed-use project on the site,
while indicating general acceptability of the originally proposed research park. The VTA also indicated the need for project plans to accommodate future light rail facilities (potentially
including a stlltion, transit center, and park-and-ride facilities) and VTA recommendations would still apply to the modified project. VTA recommendations related to pedestrian access,
bicycle access/parking, bus service, and transportation demand management are discussed in Section 4.5, Traffic and Circulation, of the DEIR and FEIR and updated in Section 11.4.5 of
this report. Mitigation Measures 4.1-1 and 4.1-2: None required for the 2002 project, 2004 project, or proposed modified project. I The project would develop 290 apartment units and
51 of these would be "below market price" units. The Town does not count the 51 "below market price" units units in the density calculation. Therefore, the proposed 239 remaining units
would be less than the allowable density of 20 units per acre (20 units per acre on 12.28 acres equals 246 units). 11-15 Vasona Research Park/Los Gatos Gateway EIR April 2004
Chapter 11 EIR Addendum II limited to the southeast corner and upper portion of the southern far;:ade. Therefore, views of the proposed modified project from the SR 85 freeway would
not significantly change. From the Los Gatos Creek Trail (Figures 9-5 and 9-6, Views'3 and 4, views ofthe project would be limited to the residential portion ofthe project, which would
remain the same as the 2004 project. Like the 2004 project, views, on the whole, from the Los Gatos Creek Trail would not change significantly. Mitigation Measure 4.2-1: None required
for the 2002 project, 2004 project, and proposed modified project. Impact 4.2-2: The project would alter the visual character of the project site and its vicinity. (2002 Project, 2004
Project, and Proposed Modified Project: Less than Significant) . Maximum building heights under the 2002 and 2004 projects were 49.5 feet for.the office buildings and 41 feet for the
apartment buildings. Under the proposed modified project, maximum building heights would remain the same: 49.5 feet high for office buildings and 41 feet high for apartment buildings.
As stated in the DEIR, FEIR and adopted EIR Addendum, the Town will review the appropriateness of building design and shadow impacts for the proposed modified project as part of the
Town's Architecture and Site review. The current Planned Development review process will determine project consistency with Town policies that relate to visual character as well as building
placement, size, and height. Mitigation Measure 4.2-2: None required for the 2002 project, 2004 project, and proposed modified project. Impact 4.2-3: The project would introduce a new
source of nighttime light. (2002 Project, 2004 Project, and Proposed Modified Project: Less than Significant) The proposed modified project wouldintroduce a new source of nighttime lighting
with exterior wallmounted light fixtures generally near building entrances as well as 12-foot high pole lights throughout parking areas and along on-site driveways. The only uses that
would be adversely affected by lighting would be residential uses to the west across Winchester Boulevard and Capri Drive, and they are already subject to street lighting
along Winchester Boulevard. In addition, final plans will need to satisfy Town Code Section 29,10.09035, which prohibits the production of direct or reflected glare (such as that produced
by floodlight onto any area outside the project boundary). This impact would be less than significant under both the 2002 project, 2004 project, and proposed modified project. Mitigation
Measure 4.2-3: None required for the 2002 project, 2004 project, and proposed modified project. 11-17 Vasona Research Park/Los Gatos Gateway EIR April 2004
Chapter 11 11.4.4 Hydrology and Water Quality EIR Addendum 1/Impact 4.4-1: The project would incrementally increase surface runofffrom impervious surfaces from additional impervious
surfaces constructed as part of the proposed redevelopment. (2002 Project, 2004 Project, and Proposed Modified Project: Less than Significant) Impact 4.4-2: Proposed development would
be located adjacent to Los Gatos Creek and could be subject to flood hazards. (2002 Project, 2004 Project, and Proposed Modified Project: Less than Significant) When compared to the
2002 and 2004 projects, the proposed modified project would have a smaller building footprint than the 2002 project and a slightly larger building-footprint than the 2004 project. In
comparison to the 2002 project design, the proposed modified project would decrease the total building footprint area by 21,844 s.f. and paving coverage by 14,372 sJ.. Landscaped areas,
walkways and residential corridors would increase by 36,126 s.f. over the 2002 design. The proposed modified project would have 5,660 sJ. more building area than the 2004 project design;
however, total paved area would decrease 3,800 s.f. from the proposed 2004 project level. While the proposed modified project would include building coverage and landscaped areas over
a sub-grade garage area, the modified project design would result in a reduction of impervious surfaces when compared to the 2002 project and a negligible increase over the 2004 project.
Under the 2002 and 2004 projects, drainage and flooding impacts were determined to be less than significant, and these same impacts would also be less than significant under the proposed
modified project since ground floor elevations would remain approximately the same. As with the 2002 and 2004 projects, the two-level underground garage under the R&D/office buildings
and one-level underground .garage under the residential buildings could be subject to flooding, but the garages would not need to be elevatedbecause they are not in the lOO-year flood
zone. The proposed modified project would have the same potential as the 2002 and 2004 projects to introduce urban pollutants and degrade surface water quality during and after construction
(potentially significant during construction [see Impact 4.4-3 below], less than significant after construction [see Impact 4.4-4 below]). Mitigation Measures 4.4-1 and 4.4-2: None required
for the 2002 project, 2004 project, and proposed modified project. Impact 4.4-3: Project construction would have the potential to degrade water quality in Los Gatos Creek. (2002 Project,
2004 Project, and Proposed Modified Project: Potentially Significant) Surface runoff generated on the project site would discharge directly to Los Gatos Creek via the site's existing
storm drain system. Like the 2002 and 2004 projects, the proposed modified project would have the same potential to degrade water quality in the creek
during project construction. Mitigation Measure 4.4-3: Since the 2002 project, 2004 project, and proposed modified project could degrade water quality during construction, the same measure
that would be required for the 2002 and 11-19 Vasona Research Park/Los Gatos Gateway EIR Apri/2004
Chapter 11 EIR Addendum II The California Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB), San Francisco Region is responsible for ensuring compliance with state and federal water quality
guidelines. The Regional Board adopted . Order No. 01-024 on February 21, 2001, reissuing waste discharge requirements under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES)
permit for the Santa Clara Valley Urban Runoff Pollution Prevention Program (Program) for the discharge of stormwater to South San Francisco Bay and its.tributaries. The Program's NPDES
permit is jointly issued to the thirteen cities of Santa Clara County, including the Town of Los Gatos, Santa Clara County and the Santa Clara Valley Water District, all of which are
co-permittees. The Order, revising Provision C.3., is intended to enhance the Dischargers' existing Performance Standardfor new development and significant redevelopment. The Order more
clearly requires a level of implementation of best management practices (BMPs), including treatment measures in new development and significant redevelopment, that reflects the regulatory
standard of maximum extent practicable (MEP). This is done through the addition of requirements to more effectively incorporate source control measures, site design principles, and structural
stormwater treatment controls in new development and redevelopment projects in order to reduce water quality impacts of stormwater runoff for the life of these projects. The consistent
application of such measures is intended to greatly reduce the adverse impacts of new development and redevelopment on water quality and beneficial uses by reducing stormwater pollutant
impacts, and impacts of increases in peak runoff rate. In orderto achieve the objectives of the RWQCB, the Town is implementing those portions of the revised Provision C.3 that have
been enabled. As the remaining elements of the provision are established, the Town will also implement appropriate measures to ensure compliance with the requirements of the NPDES permit.
permit. To ensure maintenance of water quality in urban runoff flows 1 the Town will require the implementation of appropriate control measures for runoff flows from the project site.
In order to comply with the Town's requirements, the applicant proposes the installation of bio-swales. In addition, a mechanical filtration device such as a Storm Septor, will be required
by the Town to maintain water quality impacts at a less-than-significant level. The applicant also proposes the development of stormwater detention facilities to limit post-development
runoff to pre-development values. This project component would satisfy provision C.3 requirements. Implementation of appropriate design measures to achieve this objective would reduce
potential runoff impacts from project developmentto less-than-significant levels. Mitigation Measure 4.4-4: None required for the 2002 project, 2004 project, and proposed modified
. 11.4.5 Traffic and Circulation A traffic impact study was prepared by Fehr & Peers Associates, Inc. in April 2004, and TJKM Transportation Consultants completed a peer review of this
study in April 2004. This study and peer review are available for review at the Los Gatos Community Development Department. 11-21 Vasona Research Park/Los Gatos Gateway EIR April 2004
Chapter 11 EIR Addendum II Table 11-3 Proposed Modified Project Trip Generation Estimates 2004 Project (120 ksf R&D/Office, 290 AptS)i 2,327 99 125 .224 Modified less 2004 Approved Trips
290 44 4 48 R&D/Office 160,000 s.f. 11.90 Mixed-Use (smaller generator) 3.0% EcoPass 5.0% Shuttle Program (Dedicated -Office) 3.0% Employment Near Major Bus Stop (Office) b 2.0% 2002
Project (288 ksf'R&D70flice,135 Apts) I Modified less 2002 Approved Trips Weekday AM Peak-Hour Trips Size Rate· Trips Rate· In Out Total 118 58 176 (4) (2) (6) (4) (2) (6) ill ill ill
108 53 161 44 215 259 (2) (4) (6) (2) (11) (13) (1) (6) (7) ill ill ill 38 190 228 (13) (94) (107) (17) (17) (34) 133 149 282 116 132 248 100 232 332 33 (83) (50) 126 116 242 7 33 40
PM Peak-Hour Trips Rate· In Out Total 1,872 0.51 24 123 147 0.61 (57) 3.0% (1) (4) (5) 3.0% (56) 3.0% (1) (4) (5) 3.0% (37) 2.0% '0 ill ill 2.0% 1,722 22 113 135 1,904 1.69 238 33 271
1.62 (57) (4) (1) (5) (95) 5.0% (12) (2) (14) 5.0% (57) 3.0% (7) (1) (8) 3.0% (38) 2.0% ill ill ® 2.0% 1,657 210 28 238 (762) 0.92 (89) (12) (101) 0.98 (433) 2.59 (6) (6) (12) 7.52 2,617
143 129 272 2,184 137 123 260 2,722 263 84 348 (105) (120) 45 (76) 6.97 96.21 3.0% 2.0% 290 du 6.46 109,289 s.f. 4.5 acres Modified Project Apartment Mixed-Use (smaller generator) Shuttle
Program (Dedicated -apts) Housing Near Major Bus Stop (apts) b Apt Total Use Existing to be Removed Light Industrial A to Z Nursery c Office Total Net Added without Nursery Credit Net
Added with Nursery Credit < a Office and apartment trip generation estimated using regression equations. Rates determined by dividing estimated trips by size in WOOs of square feet or
number of dwelling units). b Per VTA guidelines, a major bus stop is defined as a stop where six or more buses per hour stop during the peak period. Bus Route 38 and 60 have stops at
the intersection of Winchester and Knowles near the project site. Two Route 38 buses and 4 Route 60 buses (in each direction) stop at this intersection during the AM and PM commute periods..
c Trips Trips estimated based on ITE rates for "Nursery (Garden Center)" and assuming a 50%150% inbound/outbound split d Credit for trips generated by the A to Z nursery was not applied
to the project trip generation estimates for the 2002 EIR analysis or the current update. e Credit for the trips generated by A to Z Nursery was included in project trip generation estimates
for the purpose of calculating fees. f Does not include credit for trips generated by A to ZNursery. Source: Fehr & Peers Associates, Inc. (2004) 11-23 \!asol/a Research Park/Los Ga/os
Ga/eway EIR April 2004
chapter 11 EIR Addendum II Table 11-4 Intersection Levels of Service Existing Background Modified Project Cumulative Peak' Increase in Incr. in Intersection Hour LOSb Delay
LOS Delay LOS Critical Delayc Crit. VICd Delay LOS SR 17 Southbound Ramps and AM 46.1 E 47.3 E 48.4 E +1.9 +0.004 48.4 E
. l'M_ ..??:.Q __ p._ _ . .P. _ _._.. __ _p. _ __.. +0.3 +0.006 30.1 D San Tomas Expy.lCamden Ave. and AM 35.5 D . 42.5 E+ 42.8 E+ +0.3 +ti002'·H._..
42.8···H • H •__·---·E'+H.H.H..H ...... ".. ,_,_ .. ,',..,"_......._" ....XM .... , ",..,""'p._,_,..,",.,.." .....
.....,_ ..,....,I.?,'_".. 36.1 D +0.2 +0.003 36.1 D Winchester Blvd. and AM 5.7 B+ 5.7 B+ 5.6 B+ -0.1 +O.011··-S..:6·-·-..-· .. ·B+·....-
_ ,.!'M _ __ _?:L ___ !!:!:..__ 5.1 B+ +0.010 5.0 B+ Winchester Blvd. and AM 24.3 C-24.2 C-24.1 C-+0.014
........!.\y..t?:.± __ , "., ,." , ,.._ !'M, _. _..?:.?.:9..,_ ,.., p..:'::. _ ,..__ _ I.?_:':_ _ __ , _.p..:!:__
..,.."."., ,...,._ ,._._.,_ :!:2:Q..1.§ "" 26.3 D+ Winchester Blvd. and AM 24.6 Coo 25.2 D+ 25.8 D+ -0.3 +0.005 24.3 C-,..,.. ...P.E:........ . _ '. _ ..?._,_.
..... D-40.4 E+ 37.3 D--4.6 __ ,..::9:.9;3.2.. .. __ _p. _._.. Winchester Blvd. and AM 3.8 A 4'T-·--....·.._--A:-·-, ..--·B-..-·.. ··..·..·--.. -..
..·.... +0.059 9.3 B . ....·-..·· ..···· .......-.. -· .. .-. -..---.......,.., __�
� · _·HJ....--....-·-.-",.·.. .-·-,... .-. ..·.
__ ......!'M...._...... _..__..!g:..Q _.!3.. __.. 10.1 B 10.5 B +0.4 +0.036 .. 1..9.:?.,..._._
....,._.!3...,_..., _ Winchester Blvd. and AM 34.9 D ··..· ..--i3.6-·..--_·B=·---..-li8··-.. ---........·..--..--.;:0...1.....--·-·-----..--+0:018--·-· 13.8 BLark Ave. PM
21.9 C 13.2 B-13.3 B-+0.023 13.3 B- ... ···......-··A:M .. -......-... ..-··..·-_·C+----·--i"6:g---·
--..--..C+......-_....WO ····-....--:-C·---·····--·-...-..··:to·:3.....---··....·-.;O:oii-·····.... ......·-·---C-··-Dr. and Lark Ave. PM 29.4 D 28.8 D 31.2 D +2.3 +0.015 28.5
D .... Ramps ....··· ...··..·...·..·..·......·AM··-..--.._·..-8:3" ......-----..B-·...-...... ·..·--S:S-....-..-.....·B"----··---·ff7.....·
... --..B--..--..--..-+0:3...--..-....-· ..... ....-..·-..B---·· Lark Ave. PM 7.6 B 8.0 B 8.2 B' +0.2 +0.017 8.2 B
-···_ .. A:M---·--29:7··_ ..--b-·-··-36.'1" ..-· --0-·.. --
··--23:::, _.. "· ·..·.. Lark Ave.* PM 27.7 D+ 35.2 D 36.8 D +1.8 +0.012 25.6 D+ .. ··..· ··· ·.. ·_·AM -·15:6-..·· ..o-..··.._·-C+·--..·
-"i·6:1" · --··C:; --.._ ----.. ·..+ij·:OOS-..· ·16:0 ---C.;..-· Samaritan Dr.* PM 19.9 C 22.4 C 22.5 C +0.2 +0.007 22.8 C ·····..···..···
·AM-... ·..--..-9.s·····-..--B..-·1<1:2 --13:--10.2 B +0.003 10.1 B ...... .. , PM _.,_ _ !.Lt __..J1.:4.
__.......A..__ ..._ __.__ .. __ }!..:1._ _!i. __ Bascom Ave. and AM 10.5 B 10.8 B 10.8 B +0.1 +0.002 11.0 B SR 85 Northbound Ramps* PM 13.2 B-13.5 B-13.5 B-+0.000
13.5 BNotes:' Average stopped delay in seconds per vehicle. LOS =Level of service calculations perfonned using the 1985 Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) methodology for signalized intersections
contained in TRAFFIX. Increase in critical movement delay from Background to Project Conditions. Increase in the critical volume-to-capacity ratio of the intersection from Background
to Project Conditions. This intersection includes improvements planned by the Town of Los Gatos under Cumulative Conditions. This intersection includes improvements planned by the Town
of Los Gatos under Background, Project, and Cumulative Conditions. * Designated Congestion Management Program (CMP) Intersection. + Intersection located within the City of Campbell.
Source: Fehr & Peers Associates, Inc. (2004) 11...25 Vasolla Research Park/Los Gatos Gateway EIR Apri/2004
Chapter 11 EIR Addendum II Table 11-5 presents the capacities of each freeway segment and the estimated number of trips added to each segment by the proposed modified project. The proposed
modified project would add traffic equal to or greater than one percent of the capacity to one freeway segment: southbound SR 17 between SR 85 and Lark Avenue. A detailed analysis of
this segment is presented in Table 11-6. With the addition of project traffic, this segment would continue to operate at LOS D. Therefore, the project's impact would be less than significant.
The project is estimated to add traffic equal to Of less than one percent of the capacity of the remaining freeway segments. Therefore, the project's impact on these segments would also
be less than significant. Both the 2002 and 2004 projects were also determined to have a less-than-significant impact on these same freeway segments. Mitigation Measure 4.5-2: None required
for the 2002 project, 2004 project, and proposed modified project. Impact 4.5-3: At this stage of project planning, design details hl;lve not been finalized for vehicular, pedestrian,
and bicycle access at railroad crossings and access intersections. Such design details will be reviewed as part of Architecture and Site review, although the Town will require provision
of adequate ingress and egress for project vehicles, pedestrians and bicycles. Impact 4.5-4: At this stage of project planning, design details are not yet available for truck access
and on-site circulation. Such design details will be reviewed as part of the Town's Architecture and Site review process. While design details for the modified project will be subject
to review and approval as part of the Architecture and Site review process, the projected level of traffic using site access intersections and onsite driveways due to the project will
dictate future design requirements. The following discussion updates and supplements the FEIR and adopted EIR Addendum impact discussions related vehicular, pedestrian, and bicycle access.
The project's design details would be more similar to the 2004 project than the 2002 project. When the proposed modified project is compared to the 2004 project, it appears that the
only significant changes to the entry design would be: (1) a decrease in the on-site storage between the railroad tracks and the break in the median island at the intersection of the
main driveway with the westernmost circulation aisle; and (2) the eliminatipn of the parking area to the south of this intersection (eliminated as part of the 2004 project). The storage
length between the railroad tracks and the median island break is estimated to decrease from approximately 35 feet to 25 feet. The elimination of the parking area improved traffic operations
at the intersection of the main driveway with the westernmost circulation aisle by reducing the number of conflicting movements at this location. Vehicular Access. Vehicular access to
the project site is proposed via two driveways: one on Winchester Boulevard and one on Knowles Drive. The two proposed full access driveways would be adequate to serve the project-generated
traffic. It should be noted that there will be no access to the Santa Clara Valley Water District (SCVWD) land through the project site. Access to the SCVWD property will be determined
by the VTA and the Water District. 11-27 Vasona Research Park/Los Gatos Gateway EIR April 2004
Chapter 11 EIR Addendum II The Winchester Boulevard driveway would form the east leg of the signalized SR 85 northbound onrampIWinchester Boulevard intersection. The center median on
Winchester Boulevard and the traffic signal at this intersection would be modified to allow southbound left-turns into the proposed driveway, as well as all outbound movements. The proposed
configuration of the driveway approach is two outbound lanes (one left-turn lane and one shared through/right-turn lane) and two inbound lanes. Fehr & Peers completed a detailed analysis
of driveway lane configurations and design queue lengths at site access intersections and their analysis is included as Appendix 1. Fehr & Peers recommends two inbound lanes so that
if a vehicle is waiting to make a left turn into the westernmost on-site circulation aisle, other vehicles entering the site can use the second inbound lane to maneuver around the waiting
vehicle. Town staff has requested that the outbound driveway approach be revised to include one shared through/left-turn lane and one right-turn lane. There would be little difference
in AM or PM peak hour LOS operations with an exclusive right-turn lane in comparison to an exclusive left-turn lane on the driveway approach. LOS B operations during both peak hours
are projected with either lane configuration. The traffic volume projections, however, indicate that the left-turn volume will be approximately equal to the sum of the right-turn and
through movements at the intersection during both peak hours. Based on these projections and the results of the queuing analysis (see Appendix I), the recommended striping would be an
exclusive left-turn lane plus a shared through/right-tum lane. There are approximately 25 feet of storage between the stop bar at the Winchester driveway and the intersection of the
driveway with the first (westernmost) north-south circulation aisle. During the peak hours, vehicles would queue beyond this first internal intersection. It is recommended that stop
signs be placed on on southbound leg of this first internal intersection. If vehicles waiting to exit the site are found to block the north-south circulation aisle intersection, this
'area should be painted "keep clear." The potential conflicts at this internal intersection would be during the morning commute period when there may be an outbound queue and inbound
vehicles turning left against this queue into the first north-south circulation aisle. The site plan does not include an entry to the office garage from the first north-south circulation
aisle. This will help limit the number of offiCe employees that turn left at the first internal intersection into this circulation aisle. It is recommended that visitor parking be designated
in this first north-south circulation to further discourage office workers from parking in this area, which would reduce conflicts during the AM peak hour. Pedestrian and Bicycle.Access;
The proposed site circulation diagram shows sidewalks and pedestrian walkways around the office buildings and through and around the apartment buildings. Pedestrian connections to the
Los Gatos Creek trail are also proposed at two locations. The northern location is proposed to be a private access point for the development while the southern location would provide
public access. At the southern access location, a four-foot wide pedestrian path is proposed to extend along the southern project boundary, connecting the Los Gatos Creek trail and the
future light rail station. Fehr and Peers recommended that this path be designed to provide a multi-use trail connection between the creek trail and Winchester Boulevard/the future light
rail station (which may include widening). No parking for trail use is proposed on the project site. 11-29 Vasona Research Park/Los Gatos Gateway EIR Apri/2004
Chapter 11 EIR Addendum II • Mitigation Measure 4.5-3: Although the adequacy ofsite access will be reviewed as part ofthe Town's Architecture and Site review process, the following measures
are recommended for consideration by the Town during that process: a. Based on the estimated traffic volumes, the Winchester Boulevarddrivewe.y should he designed to provide one inhound
and two outbound lanes in order to adequately serve project generated treffie; The northbound left-tum pocket at the Winchester Boulevard/SR 85 on-ramp/site driveway intersection should
be lengthened to provide adequate storage as part of the intersection modification in coordination with the Town of Los Gatos and Caltrans. b. Pedestrian and hicycle facilities should
he provided at the Winchester drivewe.y and along A Street to Knowles Drive and safe railroad crossing points should also he provided at these intersections. Appropriate sidewalks to
accommodate both pedestrians and bicycles should be provided between the Winchester Boulevard/Boulevard/northbound SR 85 on-ramp/site driveway intersection and the project site. A sidewalk
should be provided on the north side. while the proposed pedestrian path will serve the south side of the driveway. In addition, a pedestrian sidewalk should be provided along A Street
to serve pedestrians traveling between the project site and Knowles Drive. In addition, any street improvements along the Winchester Boulevard site frontage should include or accommodate
planned bike lane improvements as specified in General Plan Policy T.I.5.10. However, feasibility of all off-site measures will need to be determined by the Town since the applicant
does not own the property where these improvements are recommended to be located. c. The VTz1 recommenrJs that the Town require pro",'ision (JIa new hus stop on northhound Winchester
Boulevard, just past the drivewe.y entrance. The hus stop should include the following improvements: (l)a minimum. 22 feot curb lane or hus duckout consistent with VTA Bus Duckout Standards,.
(2) a PGG hus step pavement pad consistent with; VTz1 Bus Stop Pavement Dete.ils; (3) an eight foot wide passenger waiting area; and (4) wheelchair curh ramps across the railroad tracks.
The Town recommends provision (JIa hus shelter (to he mainte.ined a,"/;d serviced by the property owner) with the shelter's appearance tied to the project's architecture. Since the applicant
does not own the property where the hus stop is recommended to he located, the )','ill need to determine feasihility efthe applicant providing and mainte.ining this hus stop.
The VTA and Town should determine feasibility of the applicant providing the recommended bus stop on Winchester Boulevard, but maintenance responsibilities will be either the VTA or
Town. d. Since fiber optic cable facilities are located'within the VTAlUnion Pacific Railroad Company right-of-way, the applicant will be required to contact VTA/Union Pacific before
project construction to determine whether such facilities could be affected by the project. e. The VL1 recommenrJs that the proposed connection to the Los Gatos Greek Trail he accessible
by hoth pedestrians and hicyclists. The proposed pedestrian path along the southern project 11-31 Vasona Research Park/Los Gatos Gateway EIR Apri/2004
Chapter 11 EIR Addendum II ratIo would still be within the range of parking ratios for nearby communities and developments (presented in Table 4.5-13 of the DEIR), which range between
2.6 and 4.0 spaces per 1,000 s.f. The 2002 and 2004 projects' residential parking ratio was 1.81 spaces per unit. The modified project would have the same parking ratio as the 2002 and
2004 approved projects, 1.81 spaces per unit. The Town's parking standard for multi-unit dwellings in all zones is 1.5 spaces per unit. Like the 2002 and 2004 approved projects, the
modified project's parking ratio would meet the Town's parking standard. It should be noted that, at the proposed parking ratios, the R&D/office use is assigned 560 spaces, while the
residential use is assigned 525 spaces, which is a total of 1,085 spaces. Since 1,019 spaces are proposed on-site (at grade and below grade), 66 spaces would be shared by R&D/office
and residential uses. The number of shared spaces would be more than the 34 proposed under the 2002 project but less than the 90 spaces proposed under the 2004 project. Mitigation Measure
4.5-5: None required for the 2002 project, 2004 project, and proposed modified project. Impact 4.5-6: Cumulative traffic increases with the project would further degrade level of service
operation at study intersections. (2002 Project, 2004 Project, and Proposed Modified Project: Less than Significant)· Under the 2002 and 2004 projects, cumulative traffic increases were
detennined to have a less-thansignificant impact on service level operation of key Los Gatos, Campbell, and CMP intersections. The traffic associated with pending developments was obtained
from the TOWil of Los Gatos TRAFFIX model and included currently available information on the Community Hospital expansion (as of September 2003). The City of Campbell did not identify
any pending developments in Campbell fot inclusion in this analysis. When the modified project is considered with pending development, all study Los Gatos, Campbell, and CMP intersections
are projected to continue to operate at acceptable levels of service when compared to significance criteria outlined above (see discussion under Impact 4.4-1 and Table 11-4 under Cumulative'
Conditions). Therefore, the cumulative impacts on the Los Gatos, Campbell, and CMP intersections would be less than significant. Mitigation Measure 4.5-6: None required for the 2002
project, 2004 project, and proposed modified project. 11.4.6 Air Quality Impact 4.6-1: Construction activities associated with proposed demolition and new construction would generate
short-term emissions of criteria pollutants, including suspended and inhalable particulate matter and equipment exhaust emissions. (2002 Project, 2004 Project, and Proposed Modified
Project: Temporarily Significant) 11-33 Vasona Research Park/Los Gatos Gateway EIR April 2004
Chapter 11 .. EIR Addendum 11 Impact 4.6-3: Mobile emissions generated by project-related traffic in addition to other proposed projects would cumulatively increase localized carbon
monoxide concentrations at intersections in the project vicinity. (2002 Project, 2004 Project, and Proposed Modified Project: Less than Significant) The 2002 project was detennined to
have less-than-significant impacts on regional and local air quality. Since the modified project would gerierate lower traffic levels than the 2002 project, regional and local emissions
associated with the modified project also would be less than significant. The proposed project's future COconcentrations under Cumulative Conditions (with project) would also be less
than significant. CO concentrations under Project and Cumulative Conditions are listed in Table 4.6-5 of the DEIR for the 2002 project and in Table 9-6 of the adopted EIR Addendum for
the 2004 project. Since the proposed modified project would generate less traffic than the 2002 project project but more traffic than the 2004 project, it is anticipated that projected
cumulative emissions (with project) would be in between these two sets of projections. The referenced tables indicate that both the 2092 and 2004 projects' contributions would be less
than significant; both would not exceed the State CO one-and eight-hour standards. Therefore, the proposed modified project's CO contributions also would not be expected to exceed .the
State standards. Like the cumulative impacts under the 2002 and 2004 projects, this impact also would be less than significant under the proposed inodified project. It should be noted
that under the. larger 2002 project, the highest CO levels r.epresented 70 percent of the one-hour standard and 90 percent of the eighthour standard. Mitigation Measures 4.6-2 and 4.6-3:
None required for the 2002 project, 2004 project, and proposed modified project. 11.4.7 Noise Impact 4.7-1: Project construction would result in temporary short-term noise increases
due to the operation of heavy equipment. (2002 Project, 2004 Project, and Proposed Modified Project: Less than Significant) Construction ·of the proposed modified project would involve
generally the same construction area as the 2002 and 2004 projects. Therefore, overall construction-related noise impacts (determined to be less than significant in the FEIR and adopted
EIR Addendum) would be the same as the 2002 and 2004 projects. Compared to the 2002 project, project buildings under the proposed modified project would be located closer to the northern
and western project boundaries with minimum setbacks of 80 feet from adjacent R&D/office uses to the north and 275 feet from residential uses to the west (across Winchester Boulevard).
When compared to the 2004 project, minimum building setbacks would remain approximately the same. At 275 and 80 feet, the ordinance noise limit would result in maximum noise levels of
65 dBA at residential uses to the west and 75 dBA at adjacent office buildings to the north. Temporary disturbance 11-35 Vasona Research Park/Los Gatos Gateway EIR April 2004
Chapter 11 EIR Addendum II Mitigation Measures 4.7-2 and 4.7-3: None required for the 2002 project, 2004 project, and proposed modified project. 11.4.8 Cultural Resources Impact 4.8-1:
Construction activities on the project site could disturb unknown subsurface cultural resources. (2002 Project, 2004 Project, and Proposed Modified Project: Potentially Significant)
Proposed demolition and construction would result in surface disturbance over most of the project site and, therefore, the proposed modified project, like the 2002 and 2004 projects,
would have the potential to disturb unknown cultural resources. Mitigation Measure 4.8-1: The same measure that would be required for the 2002 and 2004 projects to protect any resources
that are uncovered during construction would also
be req1.!ired for the proposed modified project. For ease of reference, it is included as follows: • Mitigation Measure 4.8-1: If it is demonstrated that there are intact deposits ojsignificant
archaeological materials, a plan for the mitigation of impacts to these resources should be submitted to the Los Gatos Community Development Departmentfor approval prior to the resumption
of construction activities in the area of identified deposits. Mitigation may include a combination of monitoring of continued excavation in archaeological deposits by an archaeologist
combined with a limited program ofarchaeological salvage ofsignificant materials and/or information. Impact Significance After Mitigation: Less than significant. 11.4.9 Effects Found
Not to be Significant An Initial Study was prepared for the project and it is included as Appendix A of the DEIR.. In general, the proposed building footprint under the proposed modified
project would be similar to the 2002 and 2004 projects, although residential buildings would cover more of the eastern portion of the site under the proposed and 2004 projects. Therefore,
impacts that are identified on page 5-1 of the DEIR as than significant or mitigated to a less-than-significant level would also apply to the proposed modified project. A brief
discussion of how the identified less-than-significant impacts would apply to the proposed modified project is provided as follows: Biological Resources. The proposed modified project
would result in removal of more trees than the 2002 or 2004 project. Under the proposed project, 55 trees would be removed (16 of these are identified as dead, declining, or potentially
hazardous), while 30 trees would be retained (three of these trees would be transplanted). In comparison, 51 trees would be removed under the 2004 project (16 of these are identified
as dead, declining, or potentially hazardous) and 35 trees would be retained (three of these trees would be transplanted). The 2002 project would have resulted in removal of approximately
42 existing trees (12 of these trees are identified as dead, declining or potentially hazardous), while 43 trees would be retained (with six of these trees to be transplanted). Existing
trees to be retained are generally located along the eastern project boundary adjacent to the Los Gatos Creek Trail, while three trees in the 11-37 Vasona Research Park/Los Gatos Gateway
EIR April 2004
Chapter 11 EIR Addendum II A Phase I and limited Phase II ESA was completed in June 1995 for the southern portion of the site, which was previously occupied by the A to Z Tree Nursery,
Inc. Soil testing indicated the presence of DDD, DDE, and DDT in shallow soils at the site, but detected levels were well below the preliminary remediation goals. Based on these data,
the ESA determined that the potential for residual chemicals related to past agricultural use would not represent an environmental concern to either the 2002 project, 2004 project, or
proposed modified project. Vibration: Based on Federal Transit Administration screening criteria, a vibration assessment is required when such vibration-sensitive uses are proposed within
600 feet of conventional railroad operations and 450 feet of light rail transit facilities. Under the modified project, proposed R&D/office buildings would be located as close as approximately
110 feet from railroad tracks. Therefore, if any vibration-sensitive R&D uses could occupy project buildings, the following measure will be required to minimize potential impacts due
to train-generated ground-borne vibration: 1. If vibration-sensitive R&D/office uses could be located in project buildings, a detailed vibration analysis shall be completed to ensure
that existing train operations andfuture light rail operations do not cause adverse vibration effects. This analysis shall recommend appropriate foundation design measures as required.
Population and Hous'ing: Like the 2004 project, the proposed modified project would add 295 residential units, increasing local population by approximately 660 people. Development of
the entire 12.28-acre site at the maximum allowable density of 20 units per acre would yield 246 residential units. The General Plan allows a density bonus for affordable housing, and
the project's 51 market price" units would not be counted in the project's density calculation. Therefore, the proposed 295 units would be consistent with the General
Plan and would not increase local or regional population beyond the level currently anticipated by the General Plan. Like the 2002 and 2004 projects, the proposed modified project would
not be growth inducing, nor would it displace any existing housing. Public Services: The proposed modified project would not significantly increase demand for public services since this
is a redevelopment project and services have been provided to former uses on the project site. The Santa Clara Fire Department has reviewed the proposed site plan, and the project will
need to meet Department requirements for minimum fire flow, access requirements, and 2001 California Building Code requirements (allowable area calculation, area and occupancy separation,
exiting and fire alarm provisions as necessary, etc.). Proposed residential units would incrementally increase demand on local schools within the Campbell Union School District and Campbell
Union High School District. Both districts currently have sufficient capacity to accommodate additional students, including those generated by the project. Since the Campbell Union School
District is currently under enrolled with available capacity, the District is not currently collecting developer impact fees. The Campbell Union High School 11-39 Vasona Research Park/Los
Gatos Gateway EIR April 2004
Chapter 11 11.4.13 Alternatives EIR Addendum II The DEIR analyzed a range of alternatives including the No Project Alternative, Off-site Alternative, Mitigated Project Alternative, Reduced
Density Alternative, Increased Residential Density Alternative, Increased R&D/Office Space Alternative, R&D+Housing Alter-native, and Residential-Commercial Alternative. The FEIR evaluated
design variations of the R&D/office project and R&D+Housing Alternative, whereby the R&D/office project was reduced by approximately 40,000 sJ. and the number of residential units was
increased from 105 to 135 units. The adopted EIR Addendum evaluated yet another configuration of the R&D+Housing Alternative, whereby the R&D/office space was further reduced and the
number of residential units was increased (120,000 s.f. of R&D/office use and 290 units). The DEIR, FEIR, and adopted EIR Addendum adequately evaluate the impacts associated with this
full range of project alternatives. 11-41 Vasona Research Park/Los Gatos Gateway EIR April 200
4Chapter 12 Appendices Appendix I Site Plan Review By Fehr & Peers Associates, Inc. April 2, 2004
Los Gatos Gateway Traffic Analysis Apri/2004 CHAPTER 4 -SITE PLAN REVIEW This section addresses the proposed site plan in terms of site access and on-site circulation. First, vehicular
site access and circulation are reviewed. Then, issues regarding transit, pedestrian, and bicycle access are discussed. The site plan showing the locations of project driveways and the
internal circulation system is shown on Figure 2. The currently available design for the main site driveway intersection with Winchester Boulevard at the northbound SR 85 on-ramp is
shown on Figure 7. It should be noted that this design has not yet been updated to reflect the current site plan. Based on the current site plan (shown on Figure 2), it appears that
the only significant changes to the entry design will be: (1) a decrease in the on-site storage between the railroad tracks and the break in the median island at the intersection of
the main driveway with the western-mostcirculation aisle, and (2) the elimination of the parking area to the south of this intersection. The storage length between the railroad tracks
and the median island break is estimated to decrease from approximately 35. feet to 25 feet. The elimination of. the parking area will improve traffic operations at the intersection
of the main driveway with the western-most circulation aisle by reducing the number of conflicting movements at this location. Vehicular Site Access and On-Site Circulation Site Access
Vehicular access to the project site is proposed via two driveways: one on Knowles Drive and one on Winchester Boulevard. The two proposed full access driveways will be adequate to serve
the project-generated traffic. The Winchester Boulevard driveway will form the east leg of the signalized SR 85 northbound on-rampMlinchester Boulevard intersection. The center median
on Winchester Boulevard and the traffic signal at this intersection will be modified to allow southbound left-turns into the proposed driveway, as well as all outbound movements (see
Figure 7). The proposed configuration of the driveway approach is two oLitbound lanes (one left-turn lane and one shared thr9ugh/right-turn lane) and two inbound lanes. Two inbound lanes
are recommended so that, if a vehicle is waiting to make a left-turn into the western-most on-site circulation aisle, other vehicles entering the site can use the second inbound lane
to maneuver around the waiting vehicle.. Town staff has requested that the outbound driveway approach be revised to include one shared through/left-turn lane and one right-turn lane.
This configuration was reviewed. LOS calculations indicate little difference in AM or PM peak hour operations with an exclusive right-turn lane in comparison to an exclusive left-turn
lane on the driveway approach. LOS B operations during both peak hours are projected with either lane configuration. The traffic volume projections, however, indicate that the left-turn
volume will be approximately equal to trie sum ofthe right-turn and through movements at the intersection during both peak hours. Based on these projections and the results of the queuing
analysis (see below), the recommended striping is an exclusive . left-turn lane plus a shared through/right-turn lane. Fehr & Peers 20
Los Gatos Gateway Traffic Analysis Apri/2004 It should be noted that there will be no access through the project site to the Santa Clara Valley Water District (SCVWD) land, located to
the south of the project site. Access to the SCVWD property will be determined by the VTA and the Water District. Queuing Design queues were estimated and compared to available storage
lengths at the intersections of Winchester Boulevard at Knowles Drive and Winchester Boulevard at northbound SR 85 onramp/site driveway at Town staffs request. Several movements at each
intersection were evaluated to estimate the storage lengths needed to serve off-site left-turn queues and on-site queues after completion of the Los Gatos Gateway project. The queues
were estimated using TRAFFIX. The projected maximum design (95th percentile) -queues for the AM and PM peak hours are summarized in Table 7. Table 7 Location Estimated Design Queues
I Existing. or I Proposed Storage i (feet11vehicles) I i Estimated Maximum Peak I Queue Length Hour j Vehicles i Feet Winchester Blvd/Knowles Ave �
� Westbound Approach I NIA I AM I 6
I 150 ..._. __ .. A.9.U .. . L J__ PMI 18 L __.1..!?9 _ . 'IAM I 1 I 25 ..._..__..
._._J....__0 __.;_f!yL...l l.._..__..__.__._ Winch...e....s...t..e...r....B....l..v...d.../..N....B......S-R 85 R-am-p--/.S-i-t-e Dr-iv-e-way -,..----·
·_..·-·-·-···--..·..-··,· ·· 'A'M· "'1"-"." "2"""" T·..'-·-·..· 50 Southbound Left-Turn ' i 155/6 i PM i 1 I 25 .,.,-..,-,...--...-..'-,-..---.-,....-...-----,-,-......--,--,-,---.....-...-----.-----
.---.--.---.-...-.-......----..-1""'------'-----'---r-Ar;,;r--·l-·-----g ---'·r·-·----260---,····, Northbound Left-Turn I 310/12 i PM I 13 i 325, ..........-...----,.--..-,...-..---...----,----....-,
-..---....-...-.---..-.......-,------....-------,-.--..--.-.---.......-..--..,-..-...------..---..----j---..------..-.."--'-.--....--..-'-..-..-t"'-...--,-......-..-......-..-.......
Northbound Right-Turn I 325/13 i I i �
� Left-Tum I 27/1 I PM 1 4 i 100 "'--"...-...-..-.....-.".-"..'''''.-...:-._'-'--"... ...-..,--'''-'-'----'--··
-------""-..,,"-·--·,-'---'---..-"T"·'---'---'--·-,·--'-;'-...--·----"·1---A-iiij..-·.....r.·-'--·,,-'2-·,,·-....·-r--·,,""--'....50--'-".....· Shared Thru/Rlght-Turn I 27/1 i PM i 4
i 100 ..'r··,·-'-------·---------'--...i-·,---·-"'··-l---------·-'-"'T-----.------.
.' .. r 3' i AM! 3 . 1 75 Shared Thru/Left-Turn i 27/1 . PM I. 6 .1. 150 ""-" ",,,,,,-,,--,..-,,..-,-,-,,--,..,,-----·..·-..··-·-,..·-,-"-..,---""---·----'-·--'--'''T--'-·-"·,-.."""--"
-"·-..·-,,..·,--··-,,..,""f"'---A'iiij'··..···,,j""" -1""" ", ,,'" -T'''''-·..·--'·'·25"'·--Right-Turn 27/1 3 PM 2 50 Notes: 1 Assuming an average vehicle spacing of 25 feet per vehicle.
2 Distance between Knowles Drive and project site. 3 Distance between stop bar and median break based on site plan dated March 25. 2004. Fehr & Peers 22
Los Gatos Gateway Traffic Analysis April 2004 right-turn lane and a shared through and left-turn lane. With the provision of a separate right-turn lane and a shared through/left-turn
lane, the maximum queue is projected to be six vehicles (150 feet) in the shared through/left-turn lane and two vehicles (50 feet) in the right-turn lane. Striping the driveway approach
with a separate left-turn lane and a shared through/right-turn lane would provide a more even distribution of queued vehicles on the approach. The Winchester Boulevard on-ramp to northbound
SR 85 is currently controlled with ramp metering during the AM commute period. Queue detectors are located on the on-ramp to prevent the ramp queue from blocking the upstream signalized
intersection. (If the queue reaches the ramp detectors, a message is sent to the Winchester Boulevard traffic signal to give a red indication to the movements feeding the ramp.) The
current Caltrans metering rate on the Winchester Boulevard on-ramp to SR 85 varies from 250 to 450 vehicles per hour for the mixed-flow lane and 900 vehicles per hour for the High Occupancy
Vehicle (HOV) lane. Observations 'conducted at this location in 2001 indicated that· the current maximum queue on this ramp is 40 vehicles, while the storage capacity is 48 vehicles.3
The traffic volume currently entering this on-ramp is 392 during the AM peak hour. With the modified project, this volume is projected to increase to 453 vehicles. It is estimated that
more than 25 percent of the on-ramp volume (or 113 vehicles) at this location is HOV traffic.4 The remaining 340 vehicles could be served within an hour given the existing Caltrans metering
rates. The queues from the ramp meter could affect the intersection and site driveway operations for short times during the AM peak hour, but the effect would be short in duration. On-Site
Circulation The two office buildings are proposed on the west side of the project site. The residential buildings are located in the center and along the east side of the site, away
from Winchester Boulevard. Circulation and parking aisles are prQvided around the boundaries of the project site with one circulation aisle provided between the office buildings and
apartments and a second provide between the apartment buildings (see Figure 8). Underground parking is proposed below both the office and apartment bUildings. Garage entrances are proposed
on the north and east sides of the office buildings and the north and east sides of the apartment buildings. The circulation aisles serve two-way traffic and provide parallel and perpendicular
parking spaces with no dead end aisles. The grade on the entrances to the office and residential parking garage entrances is a maximum of 15 percent. There are approximately 25 feet
of storage between the stop bar at the Winchester driveway and the intersection of the driveway with the first (western-most) north-south circulation aisle. During the peak-hours, vehicles
will queue beyond this first internal intersection. It is recommended that stop signs be placed on the southbound leg of this first internal intersection. If vehicles waiting to exit
the site are found to block this intersection, this area should be painted "keep clear." The potential conflicts at this internal intersection would be during the morning commute period
when there may be an outbound queue and inbound vehicles turning left against this queue into the 3 Fehr & Peers Associates, Inc., SR 17/SR 85 Improvement Projects -Draft Traffic Operations
Report iMarch 25, 2002). Ibid. Fehr & Peers 24
·Los Gatos Gateway Traffic Analysis Apri/2004 first north-south circulation aisle. The site plan does not include an entry to the office garage from the first north-south circulation
aisle. This will help limit the number of office employees that turn left at the first internal intersection into this circulation aisle. It is recommended that visitor parking be designated
in this first north"'south circulation to further discourage office workers from parking in this area, which will reduce conflicts during the AM peak hour. Pedestrian and Bicycle Access
EXisting Facilities Pedestrian facilities comprise sidewalks, crosswalks, and pedestrian signals. Sidewalks are provided on the west side of Winchester Boulevard near the project site;
Sidewalks are not provided on the east side of Winchester Boulevard. Crosswalks and pedestrian signals are provided at all key study intersections. Bicycle facilities comprise bike paths,
bike lanes, and bike routes. Bike paths are paved trails that are separated from the roadways. Bike lanes are Iclnes on roadways designated for use by bicycles by striping, pavement
legends, and signs. Bike routes are roadways that are designated for bicycle use with signs. Bike lanes are provided on Winchester Boulevard south of Knowles Drive. A multi-use path
is provided along the Los Gatos Creek Trail from San Jose through downtown Los Gatos to the Lexington Reservoir. This trail serves both bicyclists and pedestrians. Near the project site,
the trail is located on the west side of the creek, immediately adjacent to the project site. Project Access and Circulation The site circulation diagram (see Figure 8) shows sidewalks
and pedestrian walkways around the office buildings and through and around the apartment buildings. Pedestrian connections to the Los Gatos Creek trail are also proposed at two locations.
The northern location is proposed to be a private access point for the development while the southern location will provide public access. At the southern access location, a four-foot
wide wide pedestrian path is proposed along the southern project boundary that will connect the creek trail and the future light rail station. It is recommended that this path be designed
to provide a multi-use trail connection between the creek trail and Winchester Boulevard/the future light rail station. No parking for trail use is proposed on the project site. Crosswalks
are proposed: across the north and east legs of the Winchester Boulevard/site driveway intersection. (A crosswalk currently exists across the west leg.) On-site pedestrian paths will
connect to the northeast corner of the Winchester Boulevard/northbound SR 85 onramp/site driveway intersection. The proposed pedestrian path along the south side of the project site
will provide a connection from the southern edge of the project site to the southeast corner of the Winchester Boulevard/northbound SR 85 on-ramp intersection. From this intersection,
pedestrians can access the future light rail station or cross Winchester Boulevard to access the shopping center at Knowles Drive. Fehr & Peers 26
·MEETING -. . ," ... -: -" ' ..... " ". ." . DATE: COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT April 21, 2004 . . ;.. ,.'.. ADDENDUM
. '",' TO: FROM: SUBJECT: DISCUSSION: . '----. .TOWN MANAGER· ... .. CONSIDER A REQ::: Y AN .APPROVED PLANNED DEVELOPMENTRELATINGTOTHEALLOWEDSQUAREFOOTAGEOF
OFFICE SPACE ON PROPERTY ZONED CM:PD. AN ADDENDUM TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT HAS BEEN PREPARED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT.· 424-32-068.
PROPERTY LOCATION: 14300 WINCHESTER BLVD•. -FILE -·#PD-04-4. PROPERTY OWNER\APPLICANT: SOBRATO DEVELOPMENT COMPANIES.. Attachment 1is a revised Planned pevelopment (pD)Ordinance. As
explained in the April 20, 2004 Planning Commission desk item (Attachment 2) minor changes were made to re:fme and clarify '.. various conditions. A redlined version of the J>D Ordinance
is attached to the desk item as Exhibit J. The desk item also includes discussion on four modifications requested by the -applicailt that are considered policy issut'¥§,. The Planning
Commission discussed these items on April.20, 2004 and developed recommendatIons as discussed in the next section of this report. At that same meeting the applicant presented several
comparative exhibits ofthe building footprints and elevations for the approved (January 2004) projects at the Commission meeting (see Attachment 3).
Planning Commission Recominendation On April 20, 2004 the Planning COnuWssion considered the modified Planned Development (PD). There was no public testlmony. The Commission voted 5-1
to forward a recommendation for approval to the Town Council. Planning Commission action minutes are Attachment 4 andFTRlog notes of the Commission meeting
5. Additionally, Council members have been ·provided with compact discs of the recording of the meeting. The Commission recommendation includes the following suggested conditions:
PREPARED PREPARED BY: Bud N. of Community Development N:lDEVlSUZANNE\CouncillReportslFwd. to TCISobrato\l4300Win-PDAlI-add.wpd Reviewed by: Assistant Town Manager
__Community Development Reformatted: 5/30/02 Town Attorney __ Revised: 4/21/04 2:25 pm
PAGE 2 . MAYOR AND TOWN COUNCn... SUBJECT: . CONSIDER A. REQUEST DEVELOPMENT; FlLE #PD-04-4. April 21, 2004 TO MODIFY AN APPROVED PLANNED \; . .' . ." '. 1. The building height
may go up to 55 feet as requested by the applicant, but staff shall use a11.mechanisms to bring height back downito 49 feet six inches. Ifthe Council agrees with this recommendation;
the following condition should be added to the PD Ordinance: BuiLDING HEIGHT. The maximum height ofthe office buildings may be up to 55feet, exclusive ofthe tower elements. .Staffshall
work diligently with the applicant to reduce the needfor additional height above 49feet six inches through the architecture and site and building plan cAeckprocesses. . 2. Add lease
parameters to the on lease requirement. Section II of the PD Ordinance authorizes the· uses within the project. Item 1. currently states that the office buildings
may increase in sizeup to 160,000 square feet upon proof of a binding lease with an initial occupant for up to 80,000 square feet for a cOIporate headquarters. The Commissionrecommends
that the statementbe amended to include lease parameters. Ifthe Council agrees, 1 under. Section II should be modified to read as follows: Construction ofa office/research and
development (R&D) complex up to 120,000 square feet, as shown in the conceptual development plans attached to Planned Development Ordinance 2126, an,d 290 residential aparfn1ents including
239 market rate and 51. Below Market Price (BMP) units. The office/R&D c(Jmplex may increase .in size up to .160,000 square feet upon proofofa binding lease with an initial occupantfor
up to 80,000 square feet jor a'corporate headquarters (as defined by the Institute ofTraffic Engineers Traffic Design Manual) that generates sales tax to the Town ofLos Gatos. The lease
agreement shallinclude provisionsfor a minimum ofseven years with an optionfor an additionalfive years .on Building A, with a two year option on Building B. 3. Wheelstops shall be permitted
in spel:ific locations within the parking garages where' needed to prevent accidents. 'No wheel stops shall be used for surface parking. If the Councilagfees with the Commission's recommendation,
condition #12 should be modified to read as follows: PARKING. The minimumparking ratiosfor the project are 3.1 spaces/1000 squarefeetfor the office buildings and 1.8 spaces/unitfor the
apartments. The area between the office and residential uses is identified as shared parking. Parking spaces may be removed to accommodate the future light rail station, a sidewalk along
the propertyfrontage or other improvementsdeemedappropriate by the DirectorofCommunityDevelopmentprovided that the number ofspaces does notfall below the minimum levels. Any changes
to the parking layout 'shall be first approved by the Directors of Community Development and Parks & Public Works. Wheel stops may be used in the parking garages where deemed appropriate
PAGE 3 SUBJECT: CONSIDER A REQUEST TO MODIFY AN APPROVED PLANNED DEVELOPMENT; FILE #PD-04-4. April 21, 2004 and necessary for safety. Wheel stops
shall not be used in any suiface parking areas. Parking spaces shall be double striped per Town standards. 4; A freeway sign may be allowed. The Commission noted that a freeway sign
is important to a company like Netflix, but recommended that the sign not be backlit and requested that the company workwith a quality local designer to develop an appropriate sign.
It was also requested that the sign come back to the Commission for review. Netflix. indicated a willingness to develop a sign that is tasteful and appropriate for the site. This is
a significant issue that the Council should carefully consider. The Council may want to discuss thisissue with Netflix at the meeting. Ifthe Council agrees with the Commission's recommendation,
condition 15 should be modified to read as follows: PROJECTSIGNS. A signprogram shallbeproposedby the applicantandshallbe reviewed and approved by the Director of Community Development
prior to issuance of any sign permits for the project. Any signs to be placed on the site, including a monument sign, . building signsfor both the office and residential components and
directional signs shall be included.. A freeway sign may be allowedprovided that it is not backlit and is a tasteful and appropriate signfor the site. The Planning Commission shall review
the freeway sign. 6. Community benefits shall be maintained. The Commission discussed the applicant's proposal to either install or pay for a sidewalk along Winchester Boulevard or pay
a $50,000 contribution to the Town through the community benefit offering. The Commission felt it important to have the sidewalk installed and not reduce the community benefits offered
by the applicant. Understanding that the sidewalk would be within the VTA right-of-way and that the pending light rail extension affects its location, the Commission and staff· recommend
that condition 52 be modified to read as follows: WINCHESTER SIDEWALK. The applicant shall contribute to the construction oj sidewalk along Winchester Boulevard when andij VTA elects
to improve its right-oi-way from Knowles Drive to the project main driveway and does notpropose a sidewalk as part oj the improvements. The applicant's contribution shall be-proportional
to their VTA frontage. Installation oj the sidewalkshallbe contingent upon receipt oj approvalsfrom all applicable agencies. The Commissionrecommended that the communitybenefit package
notbe amended and that the $50,000 contribution for traffic and circulation improvements regardless of whether a sidewalk is eventually installed by the applicant. If the Council agrees
with the recommendation no changes to conditions are needed.
PAGE 4 MAYOR AND TOWNCOUNCa SUBJECT: CONSIDER A REQUEST TO MODIFY AN APPROVED PLANNED DEVELOPMENT; FaE #PD-04-4.
April 21, 2004 7. Excess dirt shall be trucked off the site. Given the likelihood of a height increase to enlarge the interstitial space between floors, the Commission did not wish to
see the height of the buildings increased further by spreading the excavated material Oll the site. The Commission recommends that all excess material be hauled off the site. Condition
86 requires the applicant to submit a construction traffic control plan for approval by the Town Engineer. The phasing of the project will result in the truck trips being split into
two separate time frames. The first phase off haul will occur a three month period and the second phase off haul will be about three weeks in length. If the Council agrees with
the Commission's recommendation no new conditions are needed. Attachments: 1. Revised Planned Development Ordinance (30 pages) .2. April 20, 2004 Planning Commission desk item with exhibits
I-J. 3. Comparative graphics presented by applicant (three pages) 4. Planning Commission Action Minutes for April 20, 2004 meeting 5. Planning Commission FTR log notes for April 20,
2004 meeting BNL:SD
, ORDINANCE ORDINANCE OF THE TOWNOF LOS GATOS AMENDING THE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AT 14300-14350 WINCHESTER BOULEVARD (ORDINANCE 2126) THE TOWN: COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF LOS GATOS DOES ORDAIN
AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I Ordinance 2095 for the Planned Development at 14300 & 14350 Winchester Boulevard as shown on the map attached as Exhibit A is hereby amended as follows. SECTIONll
. The amended PD (planned Development Overlay) zone established by this Ordinance authorizes the following construction and use of improvements: 1. Construction of a officeJresearch
and development (R&D) complexup to 120,000 square feet, as shown in the conceptual development plans attached to Planned Development Ordinance 2126, and 290 residential apartments including
239 market rate. and 51 Below Market Price (BMP) units. The officelR&D complex may increase in size up to 160,000 square feet upon proof of a binding lease an initial occupant for up
to 80,000 square feet for a corporate headquarters (as defined by the Institute of Traffic Engineers Traffic Design Manual) that generates sales tax to the Town of Los Gatos. 2. Landscaping,
parking, and other site improvements shown and required on the Official Development Plan (Exhibit B); 3. Uses permitted are residential, non-medical office and research and development
(R&D), subject to Section 29.80.085, and those uses specified in the underlyingCM1 Attachment 1
(Controlled Manufacturing) zone by Sections 29.70.220 (permitted Uses) and 29.20.185 (Table of Conditional Uses) of the Zoning Ordinance, as those sections exist at the time of the adoption
ofthis Ordinance, or as they may be amended in the future subject to any restrictions ,or other requirements specified elsewhere in this ordinance including, but not limited to, the
Official Development Plan. Retail and a daycare center are also authorized uses subject to approval of an architecture and site application to determine the and square
footage ofeitheruse in a manner that is otherwise consistent with this ordinance. However, no use listed in Section 29.20.185 is allowed unless specifically authorized by this Ordinance.
4. The office/R&D complex is limited to a maximum of four tenants. SECTIONm· COMPLIANCE WITH OTHER DEVELOPMENT 'STANDARDS All provisions of the Town Code apply, except when the Official
Development Plan specifically shows otherwise. SECTION IV Architecture and Site Approval is required before any construction work for the project is performed, whether or not a permit
is required for the work and before any permit for construction is issued. Construction permits shall only be issued in a manner complying with Section 29.80.130 of the Zoning Ordinance.
A garage/foundation permit may be issued prior to approval of the Architecture & Site application and approval of the Community Benefit Agreement. SECTION V The attached Exhibit A (Map)
and Exhibit B (development plans received by the Town of Los Gatos on April 14, 2004, 23 sheets), incorporated herein bythis reference, are part ofthe Official 2
Development Plan. The development plans received by the Town of Los Gatos on December 4, . 2003 are still valid for the residential component of the project. The following must be complied
with before issuance of any grading, demolition or construction permits, unless otherwise stated: TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPJv.IENT: Planning Division 1.
ARCIllTECTUREAND SITEAPPROVALREQUIRED. A separate Architecture and Site (A&S) application shall be required for the office/research and development (R&D) buildings, apartment buildings,
parking areas andlandscape improvements. This application maybe approved by the Town's Development Revie", Committee. The A&S process shall not reduce the number of apartment units below
290 or the officelR&D below the square footage authorized by this Ordinance without the consent of the applicant. 2· OFFICIAL DEVELOPMENT PLANS. The Official Development Plans provided
are conceptual in nature. Final footprints and building designs shall be determined during the architecture and site approval process. 3. BUll..DINGCOMPOSITION. TheofficelR&D complex
shallnclude anyindoor conference facilities, cafeteria, fitness center or other amenities. The size and composition of the apartment buildings shall be refined as part ofthe architecture
and site approval process. The numbe:t: ofrental units is 290. 4. BELOWMARKETPRICEPROGRAM. The developer·shall designate 51 ofthe residential units as BMP rental units. A deed restriction
shall be recorded prior to issuance of building permits stating that the BMP units must be rented as below market price units pursuantto the Town's BMP requirements in place at the time
of the Planned Development approval. 3
The BMP units shall be low income (less than 80% of median income). The unit mix identified in the January 20, 2004 Desk Item to the Town Council may be modified to allow additional
studio and one bedroom units through the architecture and site review process. 5. COMMUNITY BENEFIT. The applicant shall enter into an agreement with the Town for provision ofthe communitybenefits
being offered with the project as listed in the letterfrom the applicant dated May 14,2003 (ExhibitA to the October 22, 2003 Report to the Planning Commission). The agreement shall include
details on the timing and implementation ofeach item and shall be approved by the Town Council prior to issuance of any building permits for the project. A garage/foundation permit may
be issued prior to the Town Council approval of the Community Benefit Agreement. 6. LANDSCAPING. The planting along Los Gatos Creek shall be riparian ground covers, understory vegetation
and trees selected from the California Department ofFish & Game's Riparian Vegetation List. 7. LANDSCAPEPLAN. Thefinal landscape plan shall be reviewedbythe Consulting Arborist as part
of the Architecture & Site approval process. All Tree Protection measures recommended by ,the Consulting Arborist shall be followed. 8. **CULTURALRESOURCES MITIGATION MEASURE 4.8-1.
lfit is demonstrated that there are intact deposits of significant archaeological materials, a plan for the mitigation of impacts to these resources shall be submitted to thePlanning
Division for approval prior to resumption of construction activities in the area of identified deposits. If cultural or archaeological resources are uncovered during construction, all
work must be halted within a 50-foot radius of the find, the Community Development Director shall be notified, and a qualified archaeologist must be retained to examine the find, determine
its significance and4
make appropriate recommendations. Project personnel shall not alter the materials or their context or collect cultural resources. The cost ofthe Townretaining a qualified archaeologist
shall be paid for by the property owner/developer. Ifhuman remains are discovered, the Los Gatos Police Department and Santa Clara County Coroner shall immediately be notified. The Coroner
would determine whether or not the remains were Native American. If the Coroner determines that the remains are not subject to his or her authority, the Coroner shall notify the Native
American Heritage Commission, who would attempt to identify descendants of the deceased Native American. 9. TREEREMOVALPERMIT. A Tree Removal Permit shall be obtained priorto the issuance
of a Building, Grading or Encroachment Permit. 10. RECYCLING. All wood, metal, glass, and aluminum materials generated from the demoliShed structure shall be deposited to a company that
will recycle the materials. Receipts from the company(s) accepting these materials, noting type and weight ofmaterial, shall be submitted to the Town prior to the Town's demolition inspection.
11. LIGHTRAILEXTENSION. The developer shall participate and assist the Townin working with the Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority (VTA) in extending the light rail line from
Campbell to the project site. 12. PARKING. The minimum parking ratios for the project are 3.1 spaces/lOOO square feet for the office buildings and 1.8 spaces/unitfor the apartments.
The area between the office and residential· uses is identified as shared parking. Parking spaces may be removed to accommodate the future light rail station, a sidewalk along the property
frontage or other improvements deemed appropriatebythe Director ofCommunityDevelopmentprovidedthat the number of spaces does not fall below the minimum levels. Any changes to the parking5
layout shall be first approved by the Directors of Community Development and Parks & Public Works. Wheel stops are not permitted andshall be deleted from the plans. Parking spaces shall
be double striped per Town standards. 13. RIPARIAN CORRIDOR. Riparian planting shall be on the creek side of the trail, and a drinking fountain shall be included alongside the creek
trail if permitted by the Santa Clara Valley Water District. 14. NETWORKACCESS. Network access shall be provided in the outdoor common areas, to allow people to work outside. 15. PROJECTSIGNS.
A sign program shall be proposed bythe applicant and shall be reviewed and approved by the Director of Community Development prior to issuance of any sign . permits for the project.
Any signs to be placed on the site, including a monument sign, building signs for both the office and residential components and directional signs shall be included. 16. PROJECT PHASING.
The project may be phased as shown on the Phasing Plan included in Exhibit B. Phase I includes one office building, the residential buildings and associated garages. If the applicant/developer
elects to build the project in phases, then the site(s) for future phase(s) shall include provisions for landscaping and other attractive lowmaintenance improvements, and security and
maintenance of the land to be developed under future phases. Significant changes to the Phasing Plan may be approved through an Architecture & Site application. 17. ARCIDTECTURAL DETAILS.
The applicant shall continue to work with Planning staff and the Consulting Architect to refine the plans through the Architecture & Site review6
process. Building elevations shallbe refined as recommendedin the Consulting Architect's report dated March 29, 2004. The applicant shall submit a final set ofplans that includes all
changes reflected in the conditions of approval. Building Division 18. **GEOLOGIC MITIGATIONMEASURE4.3-1: Prior to issuance ofany building permits, project plans shall demonstrate compliance
with 1997 Uniform Building Code requirements for structural and seismic loads and recommendations made by Lowney.Associates, as required by the Building Division. 19. **GEOLOGICMITIGATIONMEASURE4.3-2
: The undocumented fill on the site shall be completely removed and replaced with engineered fill in order to minimize differential settlement and possible damage to the buildings. In
addition, sheet piles that were left in place shall be cut and removed during excavation activities. 20. **AIR QUALITY MITIGATION MEASURE 4.6-1. Construction activities shall comply
with the "Basic Control Measures" and applicable "Optional Control Measures" for dust emissions as outlined in the Bay Area Air Quality Management District CEQA Guidelines. 21. PERMITS
REQUIRED: Abuildingpermit shallbe required for the construction ofeach new structure. Separate building permits are required for site retaining walls, swimming pools, etc; separate electrical,
mechanical, and plumbing permits shall be required as necessary. 22. C;ONDITIONS OF APPROVAL. The Conditions of Approval shalJ_be stated in full on the cover sheet of the construction
plan submitted fOf building permit. 23. PLANS. The construction plans for this project shall be prepared under direct supervision of a licensed architect or engineer (Business and Professionals
Code Section 5538). 7
24. SOILS REPORT. Two copies of a soils report, prepared to the satisfaction of the Building Official, containing foundation and retaining· wall design recommendations, shall be submitted
with the building permit application. This report shall be prepared by a licensed civil engineer specializing in soils mechanics. ALTERNATE: Design the foundation for an allowable soils
1,000psfdesign pressure (UniformBuildingCode Volume 2 -Section 1805). 25. FOUNDATIONINSPECTIONS. A pad certificate prepared by a licensed civil engineer or land surveyor shall be submitted
to the project building inspector ·upon foundation inspection. This certificate shall certify compliance with the recommendations as specified in the soils report and the building pad
elevation and on-site retaining wall locations and elevations are prepared according to approved plans. Horizontal and vertical controls shall be setand certifiedby a licensed surveyor
orregistered civil engineerfor the following items: a. Pad elevation b. Finish floor elevation c. Foundation comer locations 26. TITLE 24 BNERGY COMPLIANCE. California Title 24 Energy
Compliance forms CRIR and MF-IR shall be printed on the construction plans. 27. TITLE 24 ACCESSrnn.,ITY -COMMERCIAL-I. On-site parking facilities shall comply with the latest California
Title 24 Accessibility Standards. Accessibility parking shall be provided for in both covered and uncovered parking areas. 28. TITLE 24 ACCESSrnn.,ITY -COMMERCIAL-2. On-site general
path of travel shall comply with the latest California Title 24 Accessibility Standards. Work shall include, but shall not be limited to, accessibility to building entrances from parking
facilities and sidewalks. 8
29. TITLE 24 ACCESSIBll.-ITY -COMMERCIAL·3. The buildings shall comply with the latest California Title 24 Accessibility Standards. Necessary work shall be fIrst investigated by the
design architect then confirmed by Town staff. 30. SPECIALINSPECTIONS. When a special inspection is requiredbyUBC Section 1701, the architect or engineer of record shall prepare an inspection
program that shall be submitted to the Building OffIcial for approval prior to issuance ofany building permits, in accordance with UBC Section 106.3.5. Please obtain Town Special Inspection
form from the Building Division Service Counter. The Town Special Inspection schedule shall be printed on the construction plans. 31. NON-POINT SOURCE POLLUTION STANDARDS. The Town standard
Santa Clara Valley Non-point Source Pollution Control Program specification sheet shall be part ofplan submittal. The specifIcation sheet is available at the Building Division service
counter. 32. GARAGE EGRESS. The underground parking garage for Phase I of the project (offIce component) shall have a secondary means of pedestrian egress to the satisfaction of the
Building OffIcial. Two means of egress shall be maintained until the completion of the phase two garage. 33. ADDITIONALAGENCY APPROVALS REQUIRED. The project requires the following agency
approvals before issuance of a building permit: a. West Valley Sanitation District 378-2407 b. Santa Clara County Fire Department: 378-4010 c. Campbell Union High School District: 371-0960
(residential only) Note: Obtain the school district forms from the Town Building Deparfment, after the Building Department has approved the building plans. 9
TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE DIRECTOR OF PARKS AND PUBLIC WORKS: Engineering Division 34. **HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY MITIGATION MEASURE 4.4-3. Note: the permitprocess and storm water
management requirements have been updated since the EIR was prepared. A Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) shall be prepared prior to start of construction. The SWPPP and
project plans shall be reviewed by the Town Engineering staff, and any applicable measures contained in the amended provisions C.3 and C.14 of Order 01-024 shall be incorporated. The
SWPPP shall be in conformance with the Santa Clara CountyNPDES Permit as amended by the San Francisco BayRegional Water Quality ControlBoard (RWQCB) on October 17,2001. TheSWPPP shall
be approved concurrently with the grading, drainage and erosion control 35. **TRANSPORTATION & TRAFFIC RECOMMENDATIONS: a. The Winchester Boulevard driveway shall be striped
as an exclusive left-tum lane plus a shared through/right-tum lane. The northbound left-tum pocket at this intersection shall be lengthened to provide adequate storage as part ofthe
intersection modification in coordination with the Town of Los Gatos aD.d Caltrans. b. Pedestrian and bicycle facilities shall be provided at the Winchester Blvd. driveway and along
A Street to Knowles Drive. Safe railroad crossing. points shall also be provided at the Winchester driveway access. Sidewalks to accommodate both pedestrians and bicycles shall be provided
between the Winchester Boulevard/northboundSR85 on-ramp/site driveway intersection and the project site. In addition, any street improvements along the Winchester Boulevard site frontage
10
shall include or accommodate planned bike lane improvements as specified in General Plan Policy T.I.5.1O. Feasibility of all off-site measures will need to be determined by the Town
and other agencies since the applicant does not own the property where these improvements are recommended to be located. c. The VTA and Town shall determine feasibility of the applicant
providing the recommended bus stop on Winchester Boulevard, but maintenance responsibilities will be either the VTA's or Town's. d. Since fiber optic cable facilities are located within
the Union Pacific Railroad Company right-of-way, the applicant shall contact Union Pacific before project construction to determine whether such facilities could be affected by the project.
e. The proposed four-foot wide pedestrian path along the southern project boundary (connecting the creek trail and the future light rail station) shall be widened to provide a multi-use
trail connection between· the creek trail and Winchester Boulevard/the future light rail station. This trail shall be available to pedestrians and bicyclists. 36. **TRANSPORTATION &
TRAFFIC RECOMMENDATIONS: The following provisions or improvements shall be made: a. Loading areas shall be designed to ensure the intended trucks can be accommodated. b. Well-lighted
pedestrian and bicycle paths between buildings, transit locations, and bicycle parking should be provided. c. Bicycle racks should be provided for short-term visitor parking and bicycle
lockers should be providedfor project employees in accordance withVTA Guidelines. 11
37. NOTICE OF INTENT. A Notice of Intent (NOl) shall be filed with the San Francisco Bay RWQCB. A copy of the NOI shall be provided to the Town Engineering Division. 38. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT
SECURITY. The applicant shall supply suitable securities for all public improvements that are a part ofthe development in a fonn acceptable to the Town in the amount of 100% (perfonnance)
and 100% (labor and material) prior to issuance ofany permit. Applicant shall provide two (2) copies ofdocuments verifying the cost ofthe public improvements to the satisfaction ofthe
Engineering Division ofthe Parks and Public Works Department. 39. DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT. The applicant shall enter an agreement to construct public improvements in accordance with Town
Code §24.40.020. 40. GRADING PERMIT. Permits are required for site grading and drainage. The grading permit application (with grading plans) shall be made to the Engineering Division
of the Parks & Public Works Department located at 41 Miles Avenue. The grading plans shall include final grading, drainage, retaining wall location, driveway, utilities, structural drawings
for retaining walls, and interim erosion control. Grading plans shall list earthwork quantities and a table of existing and proposed impervious areas. A rough grading permit may be issued
prior to architecture and site approval and building permits. Unless specifically allowed by the Director ofParks and Public Works, the fine grading permit will be issued concurrently
with the. building permit. The grading permit is for work outside the building footprint(s). A separate building permit, issuedbythe BuildingDivision on E. Main Street is needed for
grading within the building footprint. 41. SCVWDAPPROVAL. The following Santa Clara Valley Water District approvals shall be obtained prior to issuance of grading or encroachment permits:
12
a. Any grading or excavation proposed within 20 feet of its high pressure water line. b. Any work within 50-feet ofthe top ofthe Los Gatos Creek bank or within the vicinity ofSCVWDwatertransmission
facilities will also require a District permit. Evidence of such permits shall be provided to' the Engineering Division of Parks and Public Works. The Town will not withhold permits
if the applicant can show proof that SCVWD has not responded to a request for comments within 30 days of submittal. 42. RETAINlNG WALLS. A building permit, issued by the Building Division,
is required for all site retaining walls. In addition,' site retaining wall plans shall also be submitted to the Engineering Division of Parks and Public Works as part of the grading
permit submittal. Engineering will review the plans for construction clearances to property lines. 43. SOILS REPORT. 'One copy of the soils report shall be submitted with the grading
permit or public improvement application, whichever is submitted first. The soils report shall include specific criteria and standards governing site grading, drainage, pavement design,
retaining wall design and erosion control. The reports shall be signed and "wet stamped" by the engineer or geologist, in conformance with Section 6735 of the California Business and
Professions Code. 44. SOILS REVIEW. Prior to issuance of any permit, the applicant's soils engineer shall review the [mal grading and drainage plans to ensure that designs for foundations,
retaining walls, site grading, and site drainage are in accordance with their recommendations and the peer review comments. The applicant's soils engineer's approval shall then be conveyed
to the Town either by letter or by signing plans. 13
45. SOlLS ENGINEER CONSTRUCTION· OBSERVATION. During construction, all excavations and grading shall be inspected by the applicant's soils engineer prior to placement of concrete and/or
backfill so they can verify that the actual conditions are as anticipated in the design-level geotechnical report, and recommend appropriate changes in the recommendations contained
in the report, if necessary. The results of the construction observation and testing should be documented in an "as-built" letter/report prepared by the applicants soils engineer and
submittedto the Town before final release of any occupancy permit is granted. 46. PUBLICWORKSINSPECTOR. The applicant shall fund a full time public works inspector as required during
the earthwork and public improvement operations. The applicant will be charged on a time and materials basis. A deposit for the full amount, to be estimated by the Town based on the
Contractor's approved schedule, shall be paid prior to issuance of the grading and encroachment permits. 47. PARCEL MAP. A parcel map shall be recorded. Two copies of the parcel map
shall be submitted to the Engineering Division of the Parks & Public Works Department for review and approval. Submittal shall include closure calculations, title reports and appropriate
fee. The map shall be recorded before any building permits (excluding foundation permits) are issued. 48. DEDICATIONS. Emergency Vehicle Access Easements (BVAE's) shall be dedicated
on the parcel map. BVAE's shall encompass all on-site roadways. 49. TRUCKACCESS. Site designpresented at Architectural andSitereview shall accommodate a WB-50 truck. 14
50. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS. The following improvements shall be installed by the developer. Plans for those improvements shall be prepared by a California registered civil engineer, reviewed
and approved by the Town, and guaranteed by contract, Faithful Performance Security and Labor & Materials Security before the issuance of a building permit or the recordation of a map.
The improvements must be completed and accepted by the Town before a Certificate of Occupancy for any new building can be issued. Public improvements shall include the following: a.
Winchester BoulevardlHighway 85 illtersection: Modify the intersection and the signal of the main driveway with Winchester Boulevard. The Town and Cal Trans shall approve the preliminary
intersection and signal plans prior to start of f'mal . design by the applicant. illtersection plans shall include improvements to the rail road crossing, b. Winchester Boulevard: Entrance
drive, railroad crossing, two street lights, tie-in paving, signing, striping, access ramps, right tum pocket, bike lane,. median modifications, as required. c. A Street: Sidewalk between
project and Knowles shall be provided. The developer shall make a good faith attempt, to the satisfaction of the Public Works Director, to obtain sidewalk rightsfrom the adjacent property
owner. ill the event that such an effort fails, the developer shall work with, the Town to provide the walk within the existing right of way. Details of provisions to be provided shall
be addressed prior to issuance of an encroachment permit. 15
51. ARBORIST REVIEW. The Town Consulting Arborist shall review and approve both the grading and public improvement plan sets prior to issuance of a grading or encroachment permit. 52.
WINCHESTERSIDEWALK. The applicant shall contribute to the construction ofsidewalk along Winchester Boulevard when and if VTA elects to extend sidewalk from Knowles Drive to the project
main driveway. The applicant's contribution shall be proportional to their VTA frontage. 53. TRAIL CONNECTION. The trail connection between the Los Gatos Creek Trail and Winchester Boulevard
shall be constructed by the developer. The trail shall be maintained by the developer if the connection is provided through private property. The T own shall the trail
if the facilities are· constructed within either Santa Clara Valley Water District (SCVWD) property or within land dedicated to the Town in a form approved by the Director of Parks and
Public Works. Should the trail be constructed within SCvWD property, the developer shall update the existing Joint Use Agreement between the Town and SCVWD prior to map recordation.
54. RArLROADCROSSINGMAINTENANCE. Theportion ofthe Winchester driveway within the VTA right of way shall be maintained by the developer and VTA. The Town will not maintain new facilities
within the VTA right of way. 55. INSURANCE. One million dollars ($1,000,000) of liability insurance holding the Town harmless shall be provided in a format acceptable to the Town Attorney
before recordation of the parcel map. 56. TRAFFIC IMPACT MITIGATION FEE (COMMERCIAL) The developer shall pay a fee proportional to the project's share oftransportation improvement needed
to serve cumulative 16
development within the Town ofLos Gatos. The fee amount will be based upon the Town Council resolution in effect at the time the building permit applications is made. The fee shall be
paid before the building permit is issued. The traffic impact mitigation fee for this project, using the current fee schedule and the preliminary plans is $1,070,466. The fmal fee shall
be calculated from the fmal plans using the rate schedule in effect at the time of the building permit application, and shall be based on the net increase in trip generation as determined
by the traffic analysis prepared by Fehr and Peers. 57. ECO PASS. Eco Pass stickers shall be provided for
all full-time employees within the development upon request. Proof of Eco Pass purchases shall be provided to the Town annually. 58. PLAN CHECKFEES. Plan checkfees shall be deposited
with the Town prior to submittal of plans to the Engineering Division of the Parks and Public Works Department. 59. INSPECTION FEES. Inspection fees shall be deposited with the Town
prior to issuance of anyPermit or recordation of the Final Map. 60. GENERAL. All public improvements shall be made according to the latest adopted Town Standard Drawings and the Town
Standard Specifications. All work shall conform to the applicable Town ordinances. The adjacent public right-of-way shall be kept clear of all job related dirt and debris at the end
of the day. Dirt and debris shall not be washed into storm facilities .. The storing of goods and materials on the sidewalk and/or the street will not be allowed unless
a special permit is issued. The developer's representative in charge shall be at the job site during all working hours. Failure to maintain the public right-of-way according to this
condition may result in the Town performing the required maintenance at the developer's expense. 17
61. ENCROACHMENT PERMIT. All work in the public right-of-way will require a ConstructionEncroachment Permit. All work over$5,000 will require construction security. 62. PUBLIC WORKS
INSPECTIONS. The developer or his representative shall notify the Engineering Inspector at least twenty-four (24) hours before starting any work pertaining to on-site drainage facilities,
grading or paving, and all work in the Town's right-of-way. Failure to do so will result in rejection of work that went on without inspection. 63. DUST CONTROL. Blowing dust shall be
reduced by timing construction activities so that paving and building construction begin as soon as possible after completion of grading, and by landscaping disturbed soils as soon as
possible. Further, water trucks shall be present and in use at the construction site. All portions of the site subject to blowing. dust shall be watered as often as deemed necessary
by the Town, or a minimum of three times daily in order to insure proper control of blowing dust for the duration of the project. Watering on public streets shall not occur. Streets
will be cleaned by street sweepers or by hand as often as deemed necessary by the TownEngineer, or at least once a day. Watering associated with on.;.site construction activity shall
take place between the hours of 8 a.m. and 5 p.m. and shall include at least one late-afternoon watering to minimize the effects of blowing dust. All public streets soiled or littered
due to this construction activity shall be cleaned and swept on a daily basis during the workweek to the satisfaction of the Town. Demolition or earthwork activities shall be halted
when wind speeds (instantaneous gusts) exceed 25MPH. All trucks hauling soil, sand, or other loose debris shall be covered. 64. SURVEYING CONTROLS. Horizont,!! and vertical controls
shall be set and certified by a licensed surveyor or registered civil engineer qualified to practice land surveying, for the following items: 18
a. Retaining wall--top of wall elevations and locations b. Toe and top of cut and fill slopes 65. PRECONSTRUCTIONPAVEMENT SURVEY. PriortoissuanceofaGradingPermit, the project Applicant
shall complete a pavement condition survey documenting the extent of existing pavement defects using a 35-mm or digital video camera. The survey shall extend the full length of the truck
haul route within the Town limits. The results shall be documented in a report and submitted to the Town for review. 66. POSTCONSTRUCTION PAVEMENT SURVEY. The project Applicant will
complete a pavement condition survey to determine whether road damage occurred as a result ofproject construction and whether there were changes in pavement strength. Rehabilitation
improvements required to restore the pavement to pre-construction condition and strength shall be proposed by the applicant. The results shall be documented in a report and submitted
to the Town for review and approval. The Applicant shall be responsible for completing any required road repairs prior to release of the occupancy permit. 67. EROSION CONTROL. Interim
and final erosion control plans shall be prepared· and submitted to the Engineering Division of the Parks & Public Works Department. A maximum of two weeks is allowed between clearing
of an area and stabilizinglbuilding on an area if grading is allowed during the rainy season. Interim erosion control measures, to be carried out during construction and before installation
of the fmal landscaping shall be Interim erosion control method shall include, but are not limited to: silt fences, fiber rolls (with locations and details), erosion
control blankets, Town standard seeding specification, filter berms, check dams, retention basins, etc. Provide erosion contrOl measures as needed to protect downstream water quality
during winter months. The grading, 19
drain..age, erosion control plans and SWPPP shall be in compliance with applicable measures contained in the amended provisions C.3 and C.14 of Order 01-024 of the amended Santa Clara
County NPDES Permit. 68. SITE DRAINAGE. Stormwater detention facilities shall be provided to insure that post project runoff is less than or equal to pre-development rates. 69. STORM
DR.AINAGE OUTFALL. The drainage outfall shall be televised prior to the architecture and site submittal to verify that the existing facilities are in an acceptable physical condition.
The videotape shall be submitted to the Town Engineer for review and approval. In the event that the facility is unacceptable, the architecture and site plans shall reflect the proposed
improvements needed to rehabilitate the outfall condition. 70. NONPOlNT SOURCE POLLUTION PREVENTION. On-site drainage systems shall include a filtration devices such as bio-swales and
mechanical filters (i.e. Storm Septor) placed upstream of the site discharge point. 71. SILT AND MUD IN PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY. It is the responsibility of contractor and home owner to
make sure that all dirt tracked into the public right-of-way is cleaned up on a daily basis. Mud, silt, concrete and other construction debris SHALLNOTbe washed into the Town's storm
drains. 72. UTILITIES. The developer shall install all utility services, including telephone, electric power and all other communications lines underground, as required by Town Code
§27.50.015(b). All new utility services shall be placed underground. 73. RESTORATIONOFPUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS. The developer shall repair orreplace all existing improvements not designated
for removal that are damaged or removed because of developer's operations. hnprovements such as, but not limited to: curbs, gutters, sidewalks, 20
driveways, signs, pavements, raised pavement markers, thermoplastic pavement markings, etc. shall be repaired and replaced to a condition equal to or better than the original condition.
Existing improvement to be repaired or replaced shall be at the direction oithe Engineering Construction Inspector, and shall comply with all Title 24 Disabled Access provisions. Developer
shall request a walk-through with the Engineering Construction Inspector before the start of construction to verify existing conditions. 74. CURB AND GUTTER. The developer shall repair
and replace to existing Town standards any curb and gutter damagednow or during construction ofthis project. Newcurb and gutter shall be constructed per Town Standard Details. The limits
of curb and gutter repair will be determined by the Engineering Construction Inspector during construction of the project. DESIGN CHANGES. The Applicant's registered Engineer
shall notify the Town Engineer, in writing, at least 72 hours in advance of all differences between the proposed workand the design indicated on the plans. Any proposed changes shall
be subject to the approval of the Town before altered work is started. Any approved changes shall be incorporated into the final "as-built" drawings. 76. AS-Bun...T PLANS. Mter completion
of the construction of all work, the original plans shall have all changes (change orders and field changes) clearlymarked. The"as-built" plans shall again be signed and "wet-stamped"
by the civil engineer who prepared the plans, attesting to the changes. The original "as-built" plans -shall be review and approved the Engineering Inspector. A Mylar and AutoCAD disk
of the approved"as-built" plans shall be provided to the Town before the Faithful Performance Security or Occupancy Permit is released. The AutoCAD file shall include onlythe followinginformation
and shall conform. to the layer naming convention: a) Building Outline, Layer: BLDG-OUTLINE; b) Driveway, 21
Layer: DRNEWAY; c) Retaining Wall, Layer: RETAINING WALL; d) Swimming Pool, Layer: SWIMMING-POOL; e) Tennis Court, Layer: TENNIS-COURT; f) Property Line, Layer: PROPERTY-LINE; g) Contours,
Layer: NEWCONTOUR. All as-built digital files must be on the same coordinate basis as the Town's survey control network and shall be submitted in AutoCAD version 2000 or higher. 77.
SANITARY SEWER LATERAL. Sanitary sewer laterals are televised by West Valley Sanitation District and approved by the Town ofLos Gatos before they are used or reused. Install a sanitary
sewer lateral clean-out at the property line. 78. GREASE TRAPS. Meet all requirement of the Santa Clara County Health Department and West Valley Sanitation District for the interception,
separation or pretreatment of effluent. 79. CONSTRUCTIONNOISE. Betweenthehoursof7:00a.m. to 8:00p.m., weekdays and 9:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. weekends and holidays, construction, alteration
or repair activities shall be .allowed. TheBuilding Officialmayrestrict construction activities between 7:00amand 8:00 am weekdays. No individual piece of equipment shall produce a noise
level exceeding eighty-five (85) dBA at twenty-five (25) feet. If the device is located within a structure on the property, the measurement shall be made at distances as close to twenty-five
(25) feet from the device as possible. The noise level at any point outside of the property plane shall not exceed eighty-five (85) dBA. The Building Official and Town Engineer may allow
modified construction hours for special activities. 80. SITE SECURITY. Prior to commencement of any site work or the introduction of any earth moving equipment or building materials
onto the site, the applicant shall insure that a temporary fence constructed of materials and located to the satisfaction of the Director of Community Development has been constructed.
This fence shall be in place as approved 22
until the Director ofCommunityDevelopmentshall allow it to be removed or changed. The fence may only be expanded or contracted in size upon approval of the Director of Community Development.
Failure to adhere to this condition of approval shall result in the permit being brought to the Planning Commission for its review and introduction of stricter site and building construction
regulations. 81. PRECONSTRUCTIONMEETING. Prior to issuance of any permit or the commencement of any site work, the general contractor shall: a. Along with the project applicant, attend
a pre-construction meeting with the Town Engineer to discuss. the project conditions of approval, working hours, site maintenance and other construction matters; b. Acknowledge in writing
that they have read and understand the project conditions of approval, and will make certain that all project sub-contractors have read and understand them prior to commencing work and
that a copy ofthe project conditions of approval will be posted on site at all times during construction 82. EARTH MOVEMENT PLAN. Prior to issuance of a Grading Permit, the applicant
shall develop an earth movement and management program under the supervision of a licensed soils engineer for review and approval by the Engineering Division of the Department of Parks
and Public Works. 83. CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT PLAN. The Applicant shall submit a construction management plan that shall incorporate at a minimum the Earth Movement Plan, Traffic Control
Plan, Project Schedule, site security fencing, employee parking, construction staging area, construction trailer, and proposed outhouse locations. The Traffic Control Plan shall require
that construction traffic use the main driveway at Winchester/SR85 on 23
ramp. Construction traffic shall not be allowed on A Street without the express approval of the Town Engineer. 84. GOOD HOUSEKEEPING. Good housekeeping practices shall be observed at
all times during the course of construction. Superintendence of construction shall be diligently performed by a person or persons authorized to do so at all times during working hours.
The storing of goods and/or materials on the sidewalk and/or the street will not be allowed unless a special permit is issued by the Engineering Division. 85. SITE SUPERVISION. The General
Contractor shall provide qualified supervision on the job site at all times during construction. 86. CONSTRUCTIONTRAFFIC CONTROL. TheApplicant shall prepare a traffic control plan for
incorporation into the construction bid documents. The plan shall be submitted with the grading permit application and is subject to the review and approval of the Town Engineer. Parks
Division 87. GENERAL. All existing and newly planted trees, except those identified for removal, removal, are specific subjects of approval of this project and shall remain on the site.
88. .TREE REPLACEMENT. Replacement trees of a size and number adequate to mitigate the loss of existing mature trees shall be planted on the project site. The new trees shall be included
on the comprehensive landscape plan to be reviewed as part of the Architecture & Site. approval process. 89. NEWTREES. Newly planted and relocated trees shall be double-staked, using
rubber tree ties and shall be planted prior to acceptance of the subdivision or architecture and site approval as determined by the Parks & Forestry Superintendent. 24
90. IRRIGATION. All newly planted landscaping shall be irrigated by an in-ground irrigation system. Special care shall be taken to avoid irrigation which will endanger existing native
trees and shrubs. 91. WATER EFFICIENCY. This project is subject to the Town's Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance, Chapter 26, Article N of the Town Code. A fee of $472 shall be paid
when the landscape, irrigation plans·and water calculations are submitted for review. 92. .TREE PROTECTION FENCING. Tree protection fencing shall be placed at the drip lines of existing
trees to be retained in the areas of construction. Fencing shall be four foot high chain link attached to steel poles driven two feet into the ground when at the dripline of a tree.
Ifthe fencing is within eight feet of the trunk of a tree, a fence base may be used, as is typical in a chain link fence is rented. TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE SANTA CLARA COUNTYFIRE
DEPARTMENT: 93. HOSEVALVES/STANDPIPES. Buildings that are three or more stories in heightor where emergency access has been deemed minimal shall be equipped with standpipes designedper
NFPA Standard #14, and shall be equippedwith inch hose valves. The locations of the hose valves may be determined prior to development of the fire sprinkler plan. The existing
Fire Department connection shall be replaced with a device similaror equalto Potter RoemerModel 5776, four way, individually clappered connection...Domestic water shall not be fed from
the fire service line. 94. REQUIRED FIRE FLOW. Required fire flow is 5,750 GPM at 20 psi. residual pressure. The applicant shall present a plan for fire flow and· travel distance mitigation
for Fire Department approval prior to issuance of building permits. 25
95. AUTOMATIC FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM. Buildings requiring a fire flow in excess of 2,boo GPM shall be equipped with an approved automatic fire sprinkler system, hydraulically designed
per National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) Standards #13. 96. . FINAL REQUIRED FIRE FLOW. Required fire flow may be reduced up to 50% in buildings equipped with automatic fire sprinkler
systems, but can be no less that 1500 GPM. Therefore, the final required fire flow of 2,875 GPM at 20 psi residual pressure shall be available from any two hydrants on or near the site,
provided that they have a maximum spacing of 250 feet. 97. PRIVATE FIRE HYDRANTS. Provide fIre hydrants at locations to be determined by the Fire Department. Maximum hydrant spacing
shall be 250 feet with a minimum single flow of 1,500 gallons per minute at 20 psi. residual pressure. Prior to design, the project civil engineer shall meet with the Fire Department
water supply officer to jointly spot the requiredfire hydrant location. 98. FIRE HYDRANT LOCATION LOCATION IDENTIFlER. Priot to final inspection, a "blue" dot shall be placed in the
roadway near each fIre hydrant, as directed by the Fire Department. 99. FIRELANEMARKINGREQUIRED. Provide marking for all roadways within the project. Markings shall be perfire department
specifications. Installation shall also conform to Local Government Standards and Fire Department Standard Details & Specifications A-6. 100. FIRE DEPARTMENT KEY BOX. The buildings shall
be equipped with a permanently installed emergency access key lock box (knox) conforming to Fire Department Standard detail and Specification sheet K-1. Access keys shall be provided
to the Fire Department at the time of fInal inspection. 26
101. FIRE APPARATUS (ENGINE) ACCESS ROADS REQUIRED. Provide access roadways with a paved all weather surface and a minimum width of 20 feet, vertical clearance of 13 feet six inches,
minimum circulating turning radius complying with Truck#5 specifications. Installations shall conform with Fire Department Standard Details and Specifications A-I. 102. EMERGENCYVEHICLE
TURNAROUND. Provide an approved Fire Department engine roadway turnaround as may be required, with a minimum radius complying withTruck #5 specifications. Installations shall conform
with the Fire Department Standard Details and Specification sheet A-I. 103. TIMING OF REQUIRED INSTALLATIONS. The required fire services, fire hydrants and access road installations,
up through the:frrst lift of asphalt, shall be in place, inspected, and accepted by the Fire Department prior to the start of framing. Bulk construction materials shall not be· delivered
to the site until the hydrants and roadway have been accepted. . Clearance for building permits will will not be given until such time as this requirement is addressed by the developer,
to the satisfaction of the Fire Department. During construction, emergency access roads shall be maintained clear and unimpeded. 104. PREMISE IDENTIFICATION. Approved addresses shall
be placed on all new buildings so they are clearly visible and legible from the streets or roads fronting the property. Numbers shall be a minimum of four inches high and shall contrast
with their background, and shall be illuminated for nighttime. viewing. 105. INTERIOR COURTYARDS. The applicant shall provide a plan showing complying Fire Department access to interior
courtyards. 27
106. FIRE ACCESS. The applicant shall provide a plan showing alternate compliance to providing fire access to buildings that exceed the 150' travel distance through an alternate method
and material application. TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE POLICE CHIEF: 107. SECURITY REVIEW. The applicant shall meet with the Police Department to review the construction plans, and·shall
make any recommended design improvements needed for security, crime prevention or safety. A security consultant will be hired at the applicant's expense to assist the Town in the security
review. The consultant will work at the direction of the Town. 108. SECURITYGUARD. A thorough securityplan component shall be establishedbetween the developer and the Police Department.
During the architecture and site review process the applicant shall work with the. Police Department and Security Consultant to develop an overall securityplan to ensure appropriate
security elements are incorporatedinto the project, and which may include but is not limited to, to, security cameras, lighting, landscaping, access control and on-site security personnel.
109. GARAGE LIGHTING. Lighting at garage entrances shall fully light the entry area. Interior garage lighting shall be on 24-hoursa day. 110. FENCING. There shall be a fence along the
east property line adjacent to the Los Gatos Creek Trail. 111. PATHWAYLIGHTING. Path lights shall be provided along the trail from the Winchester Blvd. entrance to the creek trail. 28
112. CREEK TRAIL LANDSCAPING. Landscaping along the creek trail shall be selected and planted so that it does not provide a place where a person can be. concealed. Low shrubs and/or
non-dense trees ,are recommended in this area. 113. OFFICE PARKING. The applicant shall notify the Police Department of any parking restrictions for the surface space around the office
buildings. 29
SECTION VI This Ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting ofthe Town Council ofthe Town ofLos Gatos on April 23, 2004, and adopted by the following vote as an ordinance of the Town
of Los Gatos at a meeting of the Town Council of the Town of Los Gatos on effect 30 days after it is adopted. COUNClL :MEMBERS: AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: SIGNED: MAYOR OF THE TOWN
OF LOS GATOS LOS GATOS, CALIFORNIA ATTEST: CLERK OF THE TOWN OF LOS GATOS LOS GATOS, CALIFORNIA N:\DEVlORDS\l4300-14350Win-4-04.wpd 30
REPORT TO: FROM: LOCATION: EXHIBITS: DISCUSSION: Date: For Agenda
=20",-,0,,-,4,--_ Agenda Item: -----'2=---_ DESK ITEM The Plamllng Commission The Development Review Committee 14300 Winchester Boulevard Planned Development Application PD-04-4
Requesting to modify an approved Planned Development relating to the allowed square footage of office space on property zoned CM:PD. An Addendum to the Environmental Impact Report has
been prepared in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act. APN 424-32-068. PROPERTY OWNER\APPLICANT: Sobrato Development Companies DEEMED COMPLETE: April 14, 2004 FINAL
DATE TO TAKE ACTION: October 14, 2004 A.-H. Previously received I. Applicant's letter (tWo. pages), received April 19, 2004 J. Revised Planned Development Ordinance (30 pages) Following
distribution of the Planning Commission packet, staff and the applicant discussed the conditions of approval presented in the Planned Development Ordinance. Some conditions have been
modified to refine them or their intent. None of the language changes to conditions affect their intent. The applicant has requested four changes that are considered policy
issues. These include proposal ofwheel stops in the parking garages, payment ifan in-lieu fee for sidewalks aiong Winchester Blvd., proposal ofa freeway sign for Netflix, and a possible
increase in the height ofthe . office buildings. The applicant has provided a letter with the rationale for these requests (see Exhibit I). The four items are discussed below and will
ultimately need to be addressed by the Town Council. The Commission should offer recommendations to the COlillcil on each item: 1. Wheel Stops The Town Code does not allow wheel stops.
Typically a continuous concrete curb is used to prevent vehicles from hitting garage walls. TIllS issue was discussed by Council on Jaimary 20, 2004, and condition #12 was not modified.
The applicant has again raised the issue and is· asking that a continuous curb not be required, and that strategically placed wheel stops be permitted to prevent accidents. In other
areas, no wheel stops would be installed. The details of this request can be worked out as part ofthe architecture and site process if the Commission and Council agree to the applicant's
request. Staff is not opposed to the applicant's proposal. Attachment 2
The Planning ·Commission 14300 Winchester Boulevard/PD-04-4 Page 2 of3 2. Sidewalk In-Lieu Fee Condition #52 ofthe Planned Development (PD) Ordinance requires the applicant to contribute
to the constmction ofa sidewalk along WinchesterBoulevard from along the property frontage :£i'om the n011hpropel1yline to the main entrance. Construction ofa sidewalk along Winchester
Blvd. will be deferred lUltil the light rail extensionproject is lUlder const11lction. The sidewalk installation will be coordinated with theVTAconstmction because it will be built within
the VTA's light-of-wayand the exact location will be dependent on where the rail facilities are placed. The applicant does not object to paying the in-lieu fee. However, the applicant
is requesting theat the $50,000 contribution for traffic and circulation improvements that is included in the approved Commlmity Benefit package be dropped ifthe sidewalk condition is
included. It is the applicant's lUlderstanding that the COlUlcil approved this course of action as part of the January 2004 approval. The issue was discussed at the JanuaJ.y 20, 2004
hearing, but the conditions requiring a Commlmity Benefit Agreement and the sidewalk in-lieu fee were not modified by COlUlcil. Condition #5 requires a COlTImlmity Benefit Agreement
to be approved by the Town· COlmcil. The condition refers to the community benefits outlined in a letter submitted by the applicant to the Town. That letter, dated May 14, 2003, includes
the $50,000 contribution for traffic and circulation improvements. Staff rec01mnends that both the sidewalk in-lieu fee and the previously approved commlUuty benefit package inclusive
ofthe $50,000 contribution, be required. Further, condition 52 should bemodified to read as follows: 52. SIDEWALK IN-LIEU FEE. The applicant shall contribute to the construction of sidewalk
along Winchester Blvd. when and if VTA elects to extend sidewalkfrom Knowles Drive to the project main driveway. The applicant's contribution shall be proportional to their VTAfi'ontage.
. 3. 3. Freeway sign Netflix has requested that a sign that would be visible from Highway 85 be allowed on the south side ofBuilding A. The Sign Ordinance does not allow freeway signs,
but one could be allowed lUlder thePD Ordinance ifdetennined to be appropriate. The applicant believes that a sign dUlbe designed that will accommodate Netflix while still being appropriate
and tasteful. This issue can be addressed as part of the architecture and site process. 4. Building Height Netflix has begun working on facility plans and recently alerted the applicant
that there may be a need to raise the height ofthe office buildings. The additiQnal height maybeneeded to provide more interstitial space (the area between one floor's ceiling and the
next floor's floor). The applicant will provide more detail on this request at the meeting. Staffwould like the Commission's and Council's input on whether a height increase is acceptable,
and if so, to what extent. Adding up to a two and one-half foot height increase would provide provide the applicant with more flexibility in designing the
The Planning Commission 14300 Winchester BoulevardJPD-04-4 Page 3 of3 intemal spaces for the buildings, but would not result in a significant change in the building design or visual
impact. Allowing a height increase of five and one-half feet is considered a significant issue that should be carefully considered by the Commission and Council.. Whatever decision is
reached regarding the maximum height, staffwill work diligently with the applicant and Netflix to reduce the overall height of the office buildings. Bud N. Lortz,ornmucity
Development Prepared by: Suzanne Davis, Associate Planner BNL:SD N:\DEVISUZANNE\PClREPORTS\14300Winchester\14300Win-PDAlll-dsk.wpd
• 04/20/2004 13: 13 FAX 408 446 --------r-:eoo North pe Anza Blvd. SuIte 200 Cupertino, CA 95014-2075 0583 SOBRATO DEVELOPMENT COS. 40S.446.0700 FOlcsil'1'lile: 408.446.0583 wwvv.5Qbrato.com
I4l 002 ;. . Apri119,2004 Mr. Bud Lortz, Director Community Development Town ofLos Gatos 110 East Main Street Los Gatos, CA 95030 RE: 14300-14350 Winchester Boulevard PD Zoriing Modification
-Netflix. Dear Mr. Lortz: SOBRATO IOEVELOPMENT COMPANIES Regarding our request to modify the existing Planned Development Zoning Ordinance for the Los Gatos Gateway project at 14300-14350
Winchester Boulevard, there aTe a few specific subjects that we need to address. We all ofthe work already expended on this applicationby everyone that is involved:
The resulting new home for Netflix
will be a worthy accomplishment First, I would like the Town to review its restriction onwheel stops in the parking garage. In large private gamges similar to whatwe are proposing (160,000
square feet for the office portion and 137,000 square feet for the residential) it is oommon to not have any wheel stops (continuous or individual). Office building garages in San Francisco
do not have wheel stops and simply relyon the striping to guide cars into the correct position. We have interviewed users ofthese garages and have not found a single complaint The advantages
ofnot having continuous wheel stops are that it is easier to clean and to walk around the garage. Ifone is pushing a hand truck or stroller, pulling a suitcase. or in a wheelchair it
is cumbersome to only be able to travel in the drive isles. Continuous wheel stops catch debris, create maintenance issues, create tripping hazards, and generally are not helpful If
the ToW!'!-feels it is necessarr to guide the employees who park within thegarnge we believe . that strategically placed individual wheel stops can be inCOyPorated to minimize the negative
impacts. ',' , ,_. Second, in our letter dated January 14,2004 to the Town Council we outlined a choice for the TownoetWeen enforcement of a Sidewalk Fee or our $50,000 COII1Illunity
benefit aimed at traffic improvements. The Town Council chose the Sidewalk Fee. Parks and Public Works has not reflected this change in the Ordinance. I need to reiterate that we did
not offer to pay both amounts. Our reasoning was that the Sidewalk Fee is not appropriate since a sidewalk between the CalTrans right-of-way and the VTA and UP mil lines does not involve
us and will be a significant safety issue. Ifit is to becoordlnatedamongst the various agencies haVing jurisdiction, itwill happen when the VTA constructs the light rail extension as
a part ofthe VTA's work In no case can we find a reasonable nexus to exact the fee from our project -we do not own the frontage nor control any portion ofit. Nevertheless because the
Town desires the fee to be paid, we withdrew the specific community benefit and request the Ordinance reflect the same. Exhibit I
14 FA;X;..JQL446 0583 Apri119,2004 Page 2 I4J 003 Third, Nett1ix requires that the southernmost building be allowed to have slgnage is visible
from ffighway 85. This bu.ilding, given its location, can appropriately and tastefully display such signage. Sobrato and Netllix win work with Town Staffand the Consulting Architect
to confmn that the best location, size and colors are achieved in a sign that reflects the qL'lality ofthe project. Fourth, Netflix ha.s recently engaged addition:iil bbhiJ\tants to
assist them in the planning of these facilities and immediately discovered that we may need to increa.se the maxiIIl'tlln height ofthe bu.ilding to 55 feet from 49 feet 6 inches. The
additional 5 feet 6 inches may be required to fully conceal the HVAC and elevator equipment with the mansard roof. We " recognize the Town's desire to have the actual roofhide tb.e roof-top
equipment and to not .... useroofscreens. This desired detail, when combined with. the additional need for interstitial space (the area between one floor's ceiling and the neXt floor's
maY reqiIirea taller building. Netflix md Sobrato commit to working with Town Staffand the Consulting Architect as we further develop the construction documents and
define Netflix's needs. We will all work together to minimiz:e an increase in building height and to retain all ofthe proportions orthe current elevatioIls but we must have the ability
to accommodate Netllix. We are looldng forward to a smooth dev-elopment process and as always please call me with any questions. Respectfully, Senior Vice President
jsnenk@sobrato.com co: Denise Helm, Netflix . .. .> '". _.
ORDINANCE ORDINANCE OF THE TOWN OF LOS GATOS AMENDING THE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AT 14300-14350 WINCHESTERBOULEVARD (ORDINANCE 2126) THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF LOS GATOS DOES ORDAIN
AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I Ordinance 2095 for the Planried Development at 14300 & 14350 Winchester Boulevard as shown on the map attached as Exhibit A is hereby amended as follows.. SECTION
II The amended PD (Planned Development Overlay) zone established by this Ordinance authorizes the following construction and use of improvements: 1. Construction of a office/research
and development (R&D) complex up to 120,000 . square feet, as shown in the conceptual development plans attached to Planned Development Ordinance 2126, and 290 residential apartments
including 239 market rate and 51 Below Market Price (BMP) units. The officelR&D complex may .increase in size up to 160,000 square feet upon proof of a binding lease with --the appropriate
eompany that the an initial occupant will be for up to 80,000 square feet for a corporate headquarters (as defined by the Institute of Traffic Engineers Traffic Design Manual) that generates
sales tax to the Town of Los Gatos. 2. Landscaping, parking, and other site improvements shown and required on the Official Development Plan (Exhibit B); 3. Uses permitted are residential,
non-medical office and research and development (R&D), subject to Section 29.80.085, and those uses specified in the underlying CM1 Exhibit J
(Controlled 'Manufacturing) zone by Sections 29.70.220 (Permitted Uses) and 29.20.185 (Table of Conditional Uses) of the Zoning Ordinance, as those sections exist at the time of the
adoption of this Ordinance, or as they may be amended in the future subject to any restrictions or other requirements specified elsewhere in this ordinance including, but not limited
to, the Official Development Plan. Retail and a daycare center are also authorized uses subject to approval of an architecture and site application to determine the location and square
footage ofeitheruse in a manner that is otherwise consistent with this ordiriance. However, no use listed in Section 29.20.185 is allowed unless specifically authorized by this Ordinance.
4. The office/R&D complex is limited to a maximum of four tenants. SECTION ill COMPLIANCE WITH OTHER DEVELOPMENT All provisions of the Town Code apply, except when the
Official Development Plan specifically shows otherwise. SECTIONN Architecture and Site Approval is required before any construction work for the project is performed, whether or not
a permit is required for the work and before any permit for construction is issued. Construction permits shall only be issued in a manner complying with Section 29.80.130 of the Zoning
Ordinance. A garage/foundation permit may be issued prior to approval of the Architecture & Site application and approval of the Community Benefit Agreement. SECTION V The attached Exhibit
A (Map) and Exhibit B (development plans received by the Town of Los Gatos onApril 14, 2004, 23 sheets), incorporated herein by this reference, are part ofthe Official 2
Development Plan. The development plans received by the Town of Los Gatos on December 4, 2003 are still valid for the residential component of the project. The following must be complied
with before issuance of any grading, demolition or construction permits, unless otherwise stated: TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT: Planning Division 1. ARCHITECTUREAND
SITEAPPROVALREQUIRED. A separate Architecture and Site (A&S) application shall be required for the office/research and development (R&D) buildings, apartment buildings, parking areas
and landscape improvements. This application may be approved by the Town's Development Review CC:ommittee. The A&S process shall not reduce the number of apartment units below 290 or
the officelR&D below the square footage authorized by this Ordinance without the consent of the applicant. 2. OFFICIAL DEVELOPMENT PLANS. The -Official Deveiopment Plans provided are
conceptual in nature. Final footprints and building df?Signs shall be determined during the architecture and site approval process. 3. BUILDING SIZES COMPOSITION. The size of the officelR&D
complex shall be tlp to 120,000 sqtlare feet (160,000 sqtlare feet ifocctlpiedby a corporate headqp:arte.rs with a point ohafe) incltlsi ve ofinclude any indoor conference facilities,
cafeteria, fitness center or other amenities.-The size and composition of the apartment buildingsshall-berefined as part of the architecture and site approval process. The maxinmm number
of apartment rental units is 290. 4. BELOWMARKETPRICEPROGRAM. The developer shall designate 51 ofthe residential units as BMP rental units. A deed restriction shall be recorded prior
to issuance of building3
permits stating that the BMP units must be rented as below market price units pursuant to the Town's BMP requirements in place at the time of the Planned Development approvai. The BMP
units shall be low income (less than 80% of median income). The unit mix identified in the January 20, 2004 Desk Item to the Town Council may be modified to allow additional studio and
one bedroom units through the architecture and site review process. 5. COMMUNITY BENEFIT. The applicant shall enter into an agreement with the Town for provision ofthe communitybenefits
being offeredwith the project as listed in the letterfrom the applicant dated May 14,2003 (ExhibitA to the October 22,2003 Report to the Planning Commission). The agreement shall include
details on the timing and implementation ofeach item and shall be approved by the Town Council prior to issuance of any building permits for the project. A garage/foundation permit may
be issued prior to the Town Council approval of the Community Benefit Agreement. 6. LANDSCAPING. The planting along Los Gatos Creek shall be riparian ground covers, understory vegetation
and trees selected from the California Department of Fish & Game's Riparian Vegetation List. 7. LANDSCAPEPLAN. The final landscape plan shall be reviewedbythe ConsultingArborist as part
of the Architecture & Site approval process. All Tree Protection measures recommended by the Consulting Arborist shall be followed. 8. . **CULTURAL RESOURCES MITIGATIONMEASURE 4.8-1.
Ifit is demonstrated that there are intact deposits of significant archaeological materials, a plan for the mitigation of impacts to these resources shall be submitted to the Planning
Division for approval prior to resumption of construction activities in the area of identified deposits. If cultural or archaeological resources are uncovered during construction, all
work must be halted within4
11. a 50-foot radius of the find, the Community Development Director shall be notified, and a qualified archaeologist must be retained to examine the find, determine its significance
and make appropriate recommendations. Project personnel shall not alter the materials or their context or collect cultural resources. The cost oftheTownretaining a qualified archaeologist
shall be paid for by the property owner/developer. Ifhuman remains are discovered, the Los Gatos Police Department and Santa Clara County Coroner shall immediately be notified. The Coroner
would determine whether-or not the remains were Native American. If the Coroner determines that the remains are not subject to his or her authority, the Coroner shall notify the Native
American Heritage Commission, who would attempt to identify descendants of the deceased Native American. 9. TREEREMOVALPERMIT. A Tree Removal Permit shall be obtained priorto the issuance
of a Building, Grading or Encroachment Permit. . 10. RECYCLING. All wood, metal, glass, and aluminum materials generated from the demolished structure shall be deposited to a company
that will recycle the materials. Receipts from the company(s) accepting these materials, noting type and weight ofmaterial, shall be submitted to the Town prior to the Town's demolition
inspection. LIGHTRAILEXTENSION. The developer shall participate and assist the Townin working with the Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority (VTA) in extending the light rail line
from Campbell to the project--site. .-, -PARKING. The minimum parking ratios for the project are 3.1 spaces/lOOO square feet for the office buildings and 1.8 spaces/unit for the apartments.
The area between the office and residential uses is identified as shared parking. Parking spaces may be removed to accommodate the future light rail station, a sidewalk along the property
frontage or other 5
improvements deemed appropriate bythe Director ofCommunityDevelopmentprovided that the number of spaces does not fall below the minimum levels. Any changes to the parking layout shall
be first approved by the Directors of Community Development and Parks &. Public Works. Wheel stops are not permitted and shall be deleted from the plans. Parking spaces shall be double
striped per Town standards. 13. RIPARIAN CORRIDOR. Riparian planting shall be on the creek side of the trail, and a drinking fountain shall be included alongside the creek trail if permitted
by theBanta Clara Valley Water District. 14. NETWORK ACCESS. Network access shall be provided in the outdoor common areas, to allow people to work outside. 15. PROJECT SIGNS. Asign program
shall be proposed by the applicant and shall be reviewed and approved by the Director of Community Development prior to issuance of any sign permits for the project. Any signs to be
placed on the site, including a monument sign, building signs for both the office and residential components and directional signs shall be included. 16. PROJECT PHASING. The project
may be phased as shown on the Phasing Plan included in Exhibit B. Time frames fo! phasing of project components shall be appro ved through the Architecture & Site re view process. Phase
I includes one office building, the residential buildings and associated garages. The Phasing PhmIfthe applicant/developer elects to build the project in phases, then the site(s) for
future phase(s) shall include provisions for landscaping and other attractive low maintenance improvements, and security and maintenance of the land to be developed under phase t\1iiO
future phases. Significant 6
changes to the Phasing Plan may be approved through an Architecture & Site application. 17. ARCHITECTURALDETAILS. The applicant shall continue to work with Planning staff and the Consulting
Architect to refine the plans through the Architecture & Site review process. Building elevations shall be refined as recommended in the Consulting Architect's report dated March 29,
2004. The applicant shall submit a final set ofplans that includes all changes reflected in the conditions of approval; Building Division 18. **GEOLOGIC MITIGATIONMEASURE4.3-1: Prior
to issuance ofany building permits, project plans shall demonstrate compliance with 1997 Uniform Building Code requirements for structural and seismic loads and recommendations made
by Lowney Associates, as required by the Building Division. 19. **GEOLOGICMITIGATIONMEASURE4.3-2: The undocumented fill on the site shallbe completely removed and replaced with engineered
fill in order to minimize differential settlement and possible damage to the buildings. In addition, sheet piles that were left in place shall be cut and removed during excavation activities.
20. **AIR QUALITY MITIGATION MEASURE 4.6-1. Construction activities shall comply with the "Basic Control Measures" and applicable "Optional Control Measures" for dust emissions as outlined
in the Bay Area Air Quality Management District CEQA Guidelines. 21. PERMITS REQUIRED: Abuilding permit shall be required for the construction ofeach new structure. Separate building
permits are required for site retaining walls, swimmingpools, etc; separate electrical, mechanical, and plumbing permits shall be required as necessary.7
26. 22. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL. The"conditions of Approval shall be stated in full on the cover sheet of the construction plan submitted for building permit. 23. PLANS. The construction
plans for this project shall be prepared under direct supervision of a licensed architect or engineer (Business and Professionals Code Section 5538). 24. SOILS REPORT. Two copies of
a soils report, prepared to the satisfaction of the Building Official', containing foundation and retaining wall design recommendations, shall be submitted with the building permit application.
This report shall be prepared by a licensed civil engineer specializing iIi soils mechanics. ALTERNATE: Design the foundation for an allowable soils 1,000psfdesign pressure (UniformBuilding
Code Volume 2 -Section 1805). 25. FOUNDATIONINSPECTIONS. A pad certificate prepared by a licensed civil engineer or land surveyor shall be submitted to the project building inspector
upon foundation inspection. This certificate shall certify compliance with the recommendations as specified in the soils report and the building pad elevation and retaining
wall locations and elevations are prepared according to approved plans. Horizontal and vertical controls shall be set and certifiedby a licensed surveyor or registered civil engineerfor
the following items: a. Pad elevation b. Finish floor elevation c. Foundation corner locations TITLE 24 ENERGY COMPLIANCE. California Title 24 Energy Compliance forms CRIR and MF-IR
shall be printed on the construction plans. 27. TITLE 24 ACCESSlBILITY -COMMERCIAL-I. On-site parking facilities shall comply with the latest California Title 24 Accessibility Standards.
Accessibility parking shall be provided for in both covered and uncovered parking areas. 8 . ,:.. ";.
· 28. TITLE 24 ACCESSIBILITY -COMMERCIAL-2. On-site general path of travel shall comply with the latest California Title 24 Accessibility Standards. Work shall include, but shall not
be limited to, accessibility to building entrances from parking facilities and sidewalks. 29. TITLE 24 ACCESSIBILITY -COMMERCIAL-3. The buildings shall comply with the latest California
Title 24 Accessibility Standards. Necessary work shall be first investigated by the design architect then confirmed by Town staff. 30. SPECIALINSPECTIONS. When a special inspection is
required byUBCSection 1701, the architect or engineer of record shall prepare an inspection program that shall be submitted to the Building Official for approval prior to issuance of
any building permits, in accordance with UBC Section 106.3.5. Please obtain Town Special Inspection form from the Building Division Service Counter. The Town Special Inspection schedule
shall be printed on the construction plans. 31. NON-POINT SOURCE POLLUTION STANDARDS. The Town standard Santa Clara Valley Non-point Source Pollution Control Program specification sheet
shall be part ofplan submittal. The specification sheet is available at the Building Division service counter. 32. . GARAGE EGRESS. The underground parking garage for Phase I of the
project (office component) shall have a secondary means of pedestrian egress to the satisfaction of the Building Official. Two means of egress shall be maintained until the completion
o£the phase two garage. 33. ADDITIONAL AGENCY APPROVALS REQUIRED. The project requires the following agency approvals before issuance of a building permit: a. West Valley Sanitation
District 378-2407 9
b. Santa Clara County Fire Department: 378-4010 c. Campbell Union High School District: 371-0960 (residential only) Note: Obtain the school district forms from the Town Building Department,
after the Building Department has approved the building plans. TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE DIRECTOR OF PARKS AND PUBLIC WORKS: Engineering Division 34. **HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY MITIGATION
MEASURE 4.4-3. Note: the permit process and storm, water management requirements have been updated since the EIR was prepared. A Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) shall be
prepared prior to start of construction. The SWPPP and project plans shall be reviewed by the Town Engineering staff, and any applicable measures contained in the amended provisions
C.3 and C.14 of Order 01-024 shall be incorporated. The SWPPP shall be in conformance with the Santa Clara CountyNPDES Permit as amended by the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality
Control Board (RWQCB) on October 17,2001. The SWPPPshall be approved concurrently with the grading, drainage and erosion control plans. 35. **TRANSPORTATION & TRAFFIC RECOMMENDATIONS:
a. The Winchester Boulevard driveway shall be striped as an exclusive left-turn lane plus a shared through/right-turn lane. The northbound left-turn pocket at this intersection shall
be lengthened to provide adequate storage as part ofthe intersection modification in coordination with the Town of Los Gatos and Caltrans. b. Pedestrian and bicycle facilities shall
be provided at the Winchester Blvd. driveway and along A Street to Knowles Drive. Safe railroad crossing points shall also be 10
',:; . 36. provided at the Winchester driveway access. Sidewalks to accommodate both pedestrians and bicycles shall be provided between the Winchester Boulevard/northboundSR 85 on-ramp/site
drivewayintersection and the project site. In addition, any street improvements along the Winchester Boulevard site frontage shall include or accommodate planned bike lane improvements
as specified in General Plan Policy T.1.5.1O. Feasibility of all off-site measures will need to be determined by the Town and other agencies since the applicant does not own the property
where these improvements are recommended to be located. c. The VTA and Town shall determine feasibility of the applicant providing the recommended bus stop on Winchester Boulevard, but
maintenance responsibilities will be either the VTA's or Town's. . d. Since fiber optic cable facilities are located within the Union Pacific Railroad Company right-of-way, the applicant
shall contact Union Pacific before project construction to determine whether such facilities could be. affected by the project. e. The proposed four-foot wide pedestrian path along the
southern project boundary (connecting the creek trail and the future light rail station) shall be widened to provide a multi-use trail connection between the creek trail and Winchester
Boulevard/the future light rail station. This trail shall be available to pedestrians and bicyclists. **TRANSPORTATION & TRAFFIC RECOMMENDATIONS: The following provisions or improvements
shall be made: a. Loading areas shall be designed to ensure the intended trucks can be accommodated. 11
b. Well-lighted pedestrian and bicycle paths between buildings, transit locations, and bicycle parking should be provided. c. Bicycle racks should be provided for short-term visitor
parking and bicycle lockers should be provided for project employees in accordance with VTA Guidelines. 37. NOTICE OF INTENT., A Notice of Intent (NO!) shall be filed with the San Francisco
Bay RWQCB. A copy of the NOI shall be provided to the Town Engineering Division. 38. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT SECURITY. The applicant shall supply suitable securities for all public improvements
that are a part of the development in a form acceptable to the Town in the amount of 100% (performance) and 100% (labor and material) prior to issuance of any permit. Applicant shall
provide two (2) copies of documents verifying the cost ofthe public improvements to the satisfaction ofthe Engineering Division of the Parks and Public Works Department. 39. DEVELOPMENT
AGREEMENT. The applicant shall enter an agreement to construct public improvements in accordance with Town Code §24.40.020. 40. GRADING PERMIT. Permits are required for site grading
and drainage. The grading permit application (with grading plans) shall be made to the Engineering Division of the Parks & Public Works Department located at 41 Miles Avenue. The grading
plans shall include final grading, drainage, retaining wall location, driveway, utilities, structural drawings for retaining walls, and interim erosion control. Grading plans shall list
earthwork quantities and a table of existing and proposed impervious areas. A rough grading permit may be issued prior to architecture and site approval and building permits. Unless
specifically allowed by the Director of Parks and Public Works, the fine grading permit will be issued concurrently with the building permit. The grading permit is for work outside the
12
building footprint(s). A separate building permit, issued by the Building Division on E. Main Street is needed for grading within the building footprint. 41.. SCVWD APPROVAL. The following
Santa ClaraValley Water District approvals shall be obtained prior to issuance of grading or encroachment permits: a. A letter itom Santa Clata VaHey Water Dist!ict indicating they have
reviewed and appIO ved the site retaining wall stItlcttlral plan, gtading plan, and. pttblic improvement .plan shall be pWvided pliO! to isstlance of either a grading .or cncIOaehmcnt
permit. Any grading or excavation proposed within 20 feet of its high pressure water line. b. Any work within 50-feet ofthe top ofthe Los Gatos Creekbank or within the vicinity ofSCVWDwater
transmission facilities will also require a District permit. Evidence of such permits shall be provided to the Engineering Division of Parks and Public· Works plior to isStlance of the
grading and eneroachment permit. The Town will not withhold permits if the applicant. can show proof that SCVWD has not responded to a request for comments within 30 days of submittal.
42. RETAINING WALLS. A building permit, issued by the Building Division, is required for all site retaining walls. In addition, site retaining wall plans shall also be submitted to the
Engineering Division of Parks and Public Works as part of the grading permit submittal. Engin.eering 'will review the plans for construction clearances to property-linds. 43. SOILS REPORT.
One copy of the soils report shall be submitted with the grading permit or public improvement application, whichever is submitted first. The soils report shall include specific criteria
and standards governing site grading, drainage, pavement design, 13
retaining wall design and erosion control. Thereports shall be signed and "wet stamped" by .the engineer or geologist, in conformance with Section 6735 of the California Business and
Professions Code. 44. SOrr..,S REVIEW. Prior to issuance of any permit, the applicant's soils engineer shall review the final grading and drainage plans to ensure that designs for foundations,
retaining walls, site grading, and site drainage are in accordance with their recommendations and the peer review comments. The applicant's soils engineer's.approval'shall then be conveyed
to the Town either by letter or by signing the plans. 45. SOrr..,S ENGINEER CONSTRUCTION OBSERVATION. During construction, all excavations and grading shall be inspected by the applicant's
soils engineer prior to placement of concrete and/or backfill so they can verify that the actual conditions are as anticipated in the design-level geotechnical report, and recommend
appropriate changes in the recommendations contained in the report, if necessary. The results of the construction observation and testing should be documented in an "as-built" letter/report
prepared by the applicants soils engineer and submitted to the Town before final release of any occupancy. permit is granted. 46. PUBLICWORKS INSPECTOR. The applicant shall fund a full
time public works inspector fur the duration of as required during the earthwork and public improvement operations. The applicant will be charged on a time and materials basis. A deposit
for the full amount, to be estimatedby the Town based on the Contractor's approved schedule, shall be paid prior to issuance of the grading and encroachment permits. 14
47. PARCEL MAP. A parcel map shall be recorded. Two copies of the parcel map shall be submitted to the Engirieering Division of the Parks & Public WorksDepartment for review and approval.
Submittal shall include closure calculations, title reports and appropriate fee. Themap shall be recorded before any building permits (excluding foundation permits) are issued. 48. DEDICATIONS.
The following shall bc dedicated on the parcel map o! by scparate inst!tllnent. The dedications shall be reco!ded befo!e any permits are isstled. a. VlinehestC! Dri vewe:ty. An easement
of width and type specified by the PUC shall be gtanted b, separate instmment. b. Pttblie Senke Easement crSE). All on-site wadwe:tys shall be within rSE's as !eqtlited. e: Emergency
Vehicle Access Easements (BVAE's) shall be dedicated on the parcel map.' All on-site wadwe:tys shall be within EVAE's as !cqnited shallencompass all on:.site roadways. 49. TRUCKACCESS.
Site design presented at Architectilral and Sitereview shall
accommodate a WE-50 truck truck 50. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS. The following improvements shall be installed by. the developer. Plans for those improvements shall be prepared by a California
registered civil engineer, reviewed and approved by the Town, and guaranteed' by contract, Faithful Performance Security and Labor & Materials Security before the issuance of a building
permit or the recordation of a map. The improvements must be completed and accepted by the Town before a Certificate of Occupancy for any new building can be issued. Public. improvements
shall include the following: 15
a. Winchester BoulevardlHighway 85 Intersection: Modify the intersection and the signal of the main driveway with Winchester Boulevard. The Town and Cal Trans shall approve the preliminary
intersection and signal plans prior to start of final design by the applicant. Intersection plans shall include improvements to the rail road crossing. b. Winchester Boulevard: Entrance
drive, railroad crossing, two street lights, tie-in paving, signing, striping, access ramps, right tum pocket, bike lane, median modifications, as required. c. A Street: Sidewalk between
project and Knowles shall be provided. The developer shall make a good faith attempt, to the satisfaction of the Public Works Director, to obtain sidewalk rights from the adjacent property
owner. In the event that such an effort fails, the developer shall work with the Town to provide the walk within the existing right of way. Details of provisions to be provided shall
be addressed prior to issuance of an encroachment permit. 51. ARBORIST REVIEW. The Town Consulting Arborist shall-review and approve both the grading and public improvement plan sets
prior to issuance of a grading or encroachment permit. 52. WINCHESTER SIDEWALK. An in-lien fee, based on $10 per square foot, shall be paid prior to issuance of a building permit to
pay for future canst! tlction of a The·applicant shall contribute to the construction of sidewalk along across the entire Winchester Boulevard project fIOntage when and ifVTA elects
to extend sidewalk from Knowles Drive to the project main driveway. The applicant's contribution shall be proportional to their VTA frontage. 16
53. TRAIL CONNECTION. The trail connection between the Los Gatos Creek Trail and Winchester Boulevard shall be constructed by the developer. The trail shall be maintained by the developer
if the connection is provided through private property. The T own shall maintain the trail if the facilities are constructed within either Santa Clara Valley Water District (SCVWD) property
or within land dedicated to the Town in a form approved by the Director of Parks and Public Works. Should the trail be constructed within SCVWD property, the developer shall update the
existing JointUseAgreement between the Town and SCVWD prior to map recordation. 54. RAILROAD CROSSING MAINTENANCETheportion ofthe Winchesterdriveway within the VTA right of way shall
be maintained by the developer and VTA. The Town will not maintain new facilities within the VTA right of way. 55. INSURANCE. One million dollars ($1,000,000) of liability insurance
holding the Town harmless shall be provided in a format acceptable to the Town Attorney before before recordation of the parcel map. 56. TRAFFIC IMPACT MITIGATION FEE (COMMERCIAL) The
developer shall pay a fee . proportional to the project's share oftransportation improvementneeded to serve cumulative development within the Town of Los Gatos. The fee amount will be
based upon the Town Council resolution in effect at the time the building permit applications is made. The fee " shall.be paid before the building permit is issued. The traffic impact,mitigation
fee for this project, using the current fee schedule and the preliminary plans is $1,070,466. Thefinal fee shall be calculated from the final plans using the rate schedule in effect
at the time of the building permit application, and shall be based on the net increase in trip generation as determined by the traffic analysis prepared by Fehr and Peers. 17
57. ECO PASS. Eco Pass stickers shall be provided for all full-time employees within the development upon request. Proof of Eco Pass purcha.ses shall be provided to the Town annually.
58. PLAN CHECK FEES. Plan check fees shall be deposited with the Town prior to submittal of plans to the EngineeringDivision of the Parks and Public Works Department. 59. INSPECTION
FEES. Inspection fees shall be deposited with the Town prior to issuance of any Permit or recordation of the Final Map. 60. GENERAL. All public improvements shall be made according to
the latest adopted Town Standard Drawings and the Town Standard Specifications. All work shall conform to the applicable Town ordinances. The adjacent public right-of-way shall be kept
clear of all job related dirt and debris at the end of the day. Dirt and debris shall not be washed into storm drainage facilities. The storing of goods and materials on the sidewalk
and/or the street will not be allowed unless a special permit is issued. The developer's representative in charge shall be at the job site during all working hours. Failure to maintain
the public right-of-way according tothis condition may result in the Town performing the required maintenance at the developer's expense. 61. ENCROACHMENT PERMIT. All work in the public
right-of-way will require a ConstructionEncroachmentPermit. All work over $5,000 will require construction security. 62. PUBLIC WORKS INSPECTIONS. The. developer or his representative
shall notify the Engineering Inspector at least twenty-four (24) hours before starting any work pertaining to on-site drainage facilities, grading or paving, and all work in the Town's
right-of-way.. Failure to do so will result in rejection of work that went on without inspection. 18
63. DUST CONTROL. Blowing dust shall be reduced by timing construction activities so that paving and building construction begin as soon as possible after completion of grading, and
by landscaping disturbed soils as soon as possible. Further, water trucks shall be present and in use at the construction site. All portions of the site subject to blowing dust shall
be watered as often as deemed necessary by the Town, or a minimum of three times daily in order to insure proper control of blowing dust for the duration of the project. Watering on
public streets shall not occur. Streets will be cleaned by street sweepers or by hand as often as deemed necessary by the Town Engineer, or at least once a day. Watering associated with
on-site construction activity shall take place between the hours of 8 a.m. and 5 p.m. and shall include at least one late-afternoon watering to minimize the effects of blowing dust.
All public streets soiled or littered due to this construction activity shall be cleaned and swept . on a daily basis during the workweek to the satisfaction of the Town. Demolition
or earthwork activities shall behalted when wind speeds (instantaneous gusts) exceed 25MPH. All trucks hauling soil, sand, or other loose debris shall be covered. 64. SURVEYING CONTROLS.
Horizontal and vertical controls shall be set and certified by a licensed surveyor or registered civil engineer qualified to practice land surveying, for the following items: a. Retaining
wall--top of wall elevations and locations b. Toe and top of cut and..fil1slopes·, ..' ...• :.:.-.. 65. PRECONSTRUCTIONPAVEMENTSURVEY. Prior to issuance ofaGradingPermit, the project
Applicant shall complete a pavement condition survey documenting the extent of existing pavement defects using a 35-mm or digital video camera. The survey shall extend 19
the full length of the truck haul route within the Town limits. The results shall be documented in a report and submitted to the Town for review. 66. POSTCONSTRUCTION PAVEMENT SURVEY.
The project Applicant will complete a pavement condition survey to determine whetherroad damage occurred as a result ofproject construction and whether there were changes in pavement
strength. Rehabilitation improvements required to restore the pavement to pre-construction condition and strength shall. be proposed by the applicant.. The results shall be documented
in a ·repOlt and submitted to the Town for review and approval; The Applicant shall be responsible for completing any required road repairs prior to release of the occupancy permit.
67. EROSION CONTROL. Interim and final erosion control plans shall be prepared and submitted to the Engineering Division of the Parks & Public Works Department. A maximum of two weeks
is allowed between clearing of an area and stabilizing/building on an area ifgrading is allowed during the rainy season. Interim erosion control measures, to be carried out during construction
and before installation of the final landscaping shall be included. Interim erosion control method shall include, but are not limited to: silt fences, fiber rolls (with locations and
details), erosion control blankets, Town standard seeding specification, filter berms, check dams, retention basins, etc. Provide erosion control measures as needed to protect downstream
water quality during winter months. The grading, drainage, erosion control plans andSWPPPshall be in compliance witkapplicable measures contained in the amended provisions C.3 and C.14
of Order 01-024 of the amended Santa Clara County NPDES Permit. 68. SITE DRAINAGE. Stormwater detention facilities shall be provided to insure that post project runoff is less than or
equal to pre-development rates. 20
69. STORM DRAINAGE OUTFALL. The drainage outfall shall be televised prior to the architecture and site submittal to verify that the existing facilities are in an acceptable physical
condition. The videotape shall be submitted to the Town Engineer for review and approval. In the event that the facility is unacceptable, the architecture and site plans shall reflect
the proposed improvements needed to rehabilitate the outfall condition. 70. NONPOINT SOURCE POLLUTION PREVENTION. On-site drainage systems shall , include a filtration devices such as
and mechanical filters (i.e. Storm Septor) placed upstream of the site discharge point. 71. SILT AND MUD IN PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY. It is the responsibility of contractor
and home owner to make sure that all dirt tracked into the public right-af-way is cleaned up on a daily basis. Mud, silt, concrete and other construction debris SHALLNOTbe washed into
the Town's storm drains. 72. UTILITIES. The developer shall install all utility services, including including telephone, electric power and 'all other communications lines underground,
as required by Town Code §27.50.015(b). All new utility services shall be placed underground. 73. RESTORATION OFPUBLICIMPROVEMENTS. The developer shall repair orreplace all existing
improvements not designated for removal that are damaged or removed because of developer's operations. Improvements such as, but not limited to: curbs, gutters, sidewalks, driveways,
signs, pavements, raised pavement markers, thermoplastic. pavement markings, etc. shall be repaired and replaced to a condition equal to or better than the original condition. Existing
improvement to be repaired or replaced shall be at the direction of the Engineering Construction Inspector, and shall comply with all Title 24 Disabled Access 21
provisions. Developer shall request a walk-through with the Engineering Construction Inspector before the start of construction to verify existing conditions. 74. CURB AND GUTTER. The
developer shall repair and replace to existing Town standards any curb and gutter damaged now or during construction ofthis project. New curb and gutter shall be constructed perTown
Standard Details. The limits of curb and gutter repair will be determined by the Engineering Construction Inspector during construction of the project. 75. DESIGN CHANGES. The Applicant's
registered Engineer shall notify the Town Engineer, in writing, at least 72 hours in advance of all differences between the proposed work and the design indicated on the plans. Any proposed
changes shall be subject to the approval of the Town before altered work is started. Any approved changes shall be incorporated into the final "as-built" drawings. 76. AS-BUILT PLANS.
After completion of the construction of all work, the original plans shall have all changes (change orders and field changes) clearly marked. The"as-built" plans shall again be signed
and "wet-stamped" by the civil engineer who prepared the plans, attesting to the changes. The original "as-built" plans shall be review and approved the Engineering Inspector. A Mylar
and AutoCAD disk of the approved "as-built" plans shall be provided to the Town before the Faithful Performance Security or Occupancy Permit is released. The AutoCAD file shall include
only the following information and shall conform to the layernaming convention: a)'Building Outline, Layer: BLDG-OUTLINE; b) Driveway, Layer: DRNEWAY; c) Retaining Wall, Layer: RETAINING
WALL; d) Swimming Pool, Layer: SWIMMING-POOL; e) Tennis Court, Layer: TENNIS-COURT; f) Property Line, Layer: PROPERTY-LINE; g) Contours, Layer: NEWCONTOUR. All as-built digital files
22
must be on the same coordinate basis as the Town's survey control network and shall be submitted in AutoCAD version 2000 or higher. 77. SANITARY SEWER LATERAL. Sanitary sewer laterals
are televised by West Valley Sanitation District and approved by the Town of Los Gatos before they are used or reused. Install a sanitary sewer lateral clean-out at the property line.
78. GREASE TRAPS. Meet all requirement of the Santa Clara County Health Department and West Valley Sanitation Distri<;t for the interception, separation or pretreatment of effluent.
. 79. CONSTRUCTIONNOISE. Between the hours of7:00 a.m. to 8:00p.m., weekdays and 9:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. weekends and holidays, construction, alteration or repair activities shall be
allowed. TheBuilding Officialmayrestrict construction activities between7:00 amand 8:00 am weekdays. No individual piece of equipment shall produce a noise level exceeding eighty-five
(85) dBA at twenty-five (25) feet. If the device is located within a structure on the property, the measurement shall be made at distances as close to twenty-five (25) feet from the
device as possible. The noise level at any point outside of the property plane shall not exceed eighty-five (85) dBA. The Building Official and Town Engineer may allow modified construction
hours for special activities. 80. SITE SECURITY. Prior to commencement of any site work or the introduction of any earth moving equipment or building materials onto the site, the applicant
shall insure that a temporary fence of materials and located to the satisfaction of the Directc>I;,of Community Development has been constructed. This fence shall
be in place as approved until the Director of Community Development shall allow it to be removed or changed. The fence may only be expanded or contracted in size upon approval of the
Director of Community Development. Failure to adhere to this condition of approval shall result in the 23
permit being brought to the Planning Commission for its review and introduction of stricter site and building construction regulations. 81. PRECONSTRUCTION MEETING. Prior to issuance
of any permit or the commencement of any site work, the general contractor shall: a. Along with the project applicant, attend a pre-construction meeting with the Town Engineer to discuss
the project conditions of approval, working hours, site '. maintenance and other construction matters; b. Acknowledge in writing that they have'read and understand the project conditions
of approval, and will make certain that all project sub-contractors have read and understand them prior to commencing work and that a copy ofthe project conditions of approval will be
posted on site at all times during construction 82. EARTH MOVEMENT PLAN. Prior to issuance of a Grading Permit, the applicant shall develop an earth movement and management program under
the supervision of a licensed soils engineer for review and approval by the Engineering Division of the Department of Parks and Public Works. 83. CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT PLAN. The Applicant
shall submit a construction management plan that shall incorporate at a minimum the Earth Movement Plan, Traffic Control Plan, Project Schedule, site security fencing, employee parking,
construction staging area, construction trailer, and proposed outhouse locations: The Traffic Control Plan shall require that construction traffic use the main driveway at Winchester/SR85
on ramp. Construction traffic shall not be allowed on A Street without the express approval of the Town Engineer. 24
89. _ . 84. GOOD HOUSEKEEPlNG. Good housekeeping practices shall be observed at all times during the course of construction. Superintendence of construction shall. be diligently performedby
a person or persons authorized to do so at all times during working hours. The storing of goods and/or materials on the sidewalk and/or the street will not be allowed unless a special
permit is issued by the Engineering Division. 85. SITE SUPERVISION. The General Contractor shall provide qualified supervision on the job site at all times during construction. 86. CONSTRUCTIONTRAFFI
C CONTROL..TheApplicant shall prepare a traffic controlplan for incorporation into the construction bid documents. The plan shall be submitted with the . grading permit application and
is subject to the review and approval of the Town Engineer. Parks Division 87. GENERAL. All existing and newly planted trees, except those identified for removal, are specific subjects
of approval of this project and shall remain on the site. 88. TREE REPLACEMENT. REPLACEMENT. Replacement trees of a size and number adequate to mitigate the loss of existing mature trees
shall be planted on the project site. The new trees shall be included on the comprehensive landscape plan to be reviewed as part of the Architecture &. Site approval process. NEW TREES.
Newly planted and relocated trees shall be double-staked, using rubber tree ties and shall be planted prior to acceptance, ofJhe subdivision or architecture and site approval as determined
by the Parks & Forestry Superintendent. 90. IRRIGATION. All newly planted la:p.dscaping shall be irrigated by an in-ground irrigation system. Special care shall be taken to avoid irrigation
which will endanger existing native trees and shrubs. 25
91. WATER EFFICIENCY. This project is subject to the Town's Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance, Chapter 26, Article N of the Town Code. A fee of $472 shall be paid when the landscape,
irrigation plans and water calculations are submitted for review. 92. TREE PROTECTION FENCING. Tree protection fencing shall be placed at the drip lines of existing trees to be retained
in the areas ofconstruction. Fencing shall be four foot high chain link attached to steel poles driven two feet into the ground when at the dripline of a tree. Ifthe fencing is within
eightfeet of the trunk of a tree, a fence base may be used, as is typical in a chain link fence is rented. TO THE SATISFACTION.OF THE SANTA CLARA COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT: 93. HOSEVALVES/STANDPIPES.
Buildings that are three ormore stories in height or where emergency access has been deemed minimal shall be equipped with standpipes designed per NFPA Standard #14, and shall be equipped
with 2Yz inch hose valves. The locations of the 2Yz hose valves may be determined prior to development of the fire sprinkler plan. The existing Fire Department connection shall be replaced
with a device similar or equal to Potter RoemerModel 5776, four way, individually clappered connection. Domestic water shall not be fed from the fire service line. 94. REQUIRED FIRE
FLOW. Required fire flow is 5,750 GPM at 20 psi. residual pressure. The applicant shall present a plan for fire flow and travel distance mitigation for Fire, Department approval prior
to issuance of building permits. 95. AUTOMATIC FJRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM. Buildings requiring a fire flow in excess of 2,000 GPM shall be equipped with an approved automatic fire sprinkler
system, hydraulically designed per National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) Standards #13.26
96. FINAL REQUIRED FIRE FLOW, Required fire flow may be reduced up to 50% in buildings equipped with automatic fire sprinkler systems, but can be no less that 1500 GPM. Therefore, the
final required fire flow of 2,875 GPM at 20 psi residual pressure shall be available from any two hydrants on or near the site, provided that they have a maximum spacing of 250 feet.
97. PRNATE FIRE HYDRANTS. Provide fire hydrants at locations to be determined by the Fire Department. Maximum hydrant spacing shall be 250 feet with a minimum single flow of 1,500 gallons
per minute at 20 psi. residual pressure. Prior to design, the project civil engineer shall meet with the Fire Department water supply officer to jointly spot the required fire hydrant
location. 98. FIRE HYDRANT LOCATION IDENTIFIER. Prior to final inspection, a "blue" dot shall be placed in the roadway near each fire hydrant, as directed by the Fire Department. 99.
FIRELANEMARKINGREQUIRED. Provide marking for all roadways within the project. Markings shall be per fire department specifications. Installation shall also conformto Local Government
Standards and Fire Department Standard Details & Specifications A-6. 100. FIRE DEPARTMENT KEY BOX. The buildings shall be equipped with a permanently installed emergency access key lock
box (knox) conforming to Fire Department Standard detail and Specification sheet K-1. Access keys shall be provided to the Fire Department at the time of final inspection. 101. FIRE
APPARATUS (ENGINE) ACCESS ROADS REQUIRED. Provide access roadways with a paved all weather surface and a minimum width of 20 feet, vertical clearance of 13 feet six inches, minimum circulating
turning radius complying with Truck #5 specifications. Installations shall conform with Fire Department Standard Details and Specifications A-I. 27
102. EMERGENCYVEHICLE TURNAROUND. Provide an approved Fire Department engine roadway turnaround as may be required, with a minimum radius complying with Truck #5 specifications. Installations
shall conform with the Fire Department Standard Details and Specification sheet A-I. 103. TIMING OFREQUIRED INSTALLATIONS. The required fire services, fire hydrants and access road installations,
up through the first lift of asphalt, shall be in place, inspected, and accepted by the Fire Department prior to the start of framing. Bulk con'struction materials shall not be delivered
to the site until the hydrants and roadway have been accepted. Clearance for building permits will not be given until s'uch time as this requirement is addressed by the developer, to
the satisfaction of the Fire Department. During construction, emergency access roads shall be maintained clear and unimpeded. 104. PREMISE IDENTIFICATION. Approved addresses shall be
placed on all new buildings so they are clearly visible and legible from the streets or roads fronting the property. Numbers shall be a minimum of four inches high and shall contrast
with their background, and shall be illuminated for nighttime viewing. 105. INTERIOR COURTYARDS. The applicant shall provide a plan showing complying Fire Department access to interior
courtyards. 106. FIRE ACCESS. The applicant shall provide a plan showing alternate compliance to providing fire access to buildings that exceed the ISO' travel·distance through an alternate
method and material application. 28
113. OFFICE PARKING. The applicant shall notify the Police Department of any parking restrictions for the surface space around the office buildings. 29
SECTION VI This Ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting ofthe Town Council ofthe Town ofLos Gatos on April 23, 2004, and adopted by the following vote as an ordinance of the Town
of Los Gatos at a meeting of the Town Council of the Town of Los Gatos on effect 30 days after it is adopted. COUNCIL MEMBERS: AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: SIGNED: MAYOR OF THE TOWN
OF LOS GATOS LOS GATOS, CALIFORNIA ATTEST: CLERK OF THE TOWN OF LOS GATOS LOS GATOS, CALIFORNIA N:\DEV\ORDS\J4300·J4350Win-3-04.wpd 30
OUTLINE OF NEW PROPOSED PROJECT \ _ f1."P.1!Il••\1II01 f'...... f••••••••• '-lII•••..::..:.:..::elollll_liIllIi!" BUILDINGB PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PROJECT OUTLINE OF NEW PROPOSED PROJECT
BUILDINGA PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PROJECT ------------------------------------------------'G)
Attachment 3
\t?i BUILDINGB BUILDING A :ccw :g "-. li1 "- -----------------.,,-----------------------:.---
-------JeD
IIIN lO IIII II,II\I,\ I\ !!! I ......;.t \ .-... ...
TOWN OF LOS GATOS PLANNING COMMISSION :MEETING ACTION MINUTES TOWN COUNCIL CHAMBERS 110 E. MAIN STREET TUESDAY, APRIL 20, 2004 •• 6:00 P.M. Please refer to compact disk # 04-20-04 to
hear the entire proceedings of this meeting. ROLLCALL: Present: Absent: Others: Phil Micciche, Vice Chair; Michael Burke, Thomas O'Donnell, Lee Quintana, Joanne Talesfore and Morris
Trevithick Jeanne Drexel, Chair Town Manager, Debra Figone, Community Development Director Bud Lortz, Town Attorney Orry Korb, Associate Planner Suzanne Davis, Director of Parks & Public
Works John Curtis, TownEngirieer Kevin Rohani and Associate Civil Engineer Fletcher Parsons. . VERBAL COMMUNICATION None CONSENT CALENDAR -None APPROVAL OF MINUTES· None CONTINUED PUBLIC
HEARING ITEM 1 Zoning Code Amendment A·04·1 Consider amending the Town Code to modify the personal service business regulations in the C-2 (Central Business District) zone. It has been
determined that this project could not have a significant impact on the environment, therefore, the project is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (Section 15061
(b)(3)). . APPLICANT: Town of Los Gatos (Continued from April 14, 2004) Attachment 4
Planning Commission -April 20, 2004 Action Meeting Minutes Page 2 Due to the nature of Zoning Code Amendment A-04-1, it is determined that Commissioners Burke, Quintana and Trevithick
all have conflicts of interest according to FPPC guidelines. Since this is an action that requires four votes and no quorum exists with the remaining Commissioners for this item to be
forwarded to Council, the item must be continued. MOTION: Motion by Chair Micciche and seconded by Commissioner Trevithick to continue this item to the Planning Commission meeting on
April 28, 2004. Motion carried 6-0 NEWPUBLIC HEARINGS ITEM 2 14300 Winchester Boulevard Planned Development Application PD-04-4 Requesting to modify an approved Planned Development relating
to the allowed square footage of office space on property zoned CM:PD. An Adderidum to the Environmental Impact Report will be prepared in accordance with the California Environmental
Quality Act. APN 424-32-068. PROPERTY OWNER/APPLICANT: Sobrato Development Companies MOTION: Motion by Commissioner Burke and seconded by Commissioner O'Donnell to recommend approval
with modified conditions and forward to the Town Council for final action. Motion carried 5-1 (Commissioner Quintana dissenting). CONTINUED OTHER BUSINESS -None NEW OTHER BUSINESS -None
Sub-Committee Reports· None Report from Director of Community Development -None
Planning Commission -April 20, 2004 Action Meeting Minutes Page 3 ADJOURNMENT Vice Chair Micciche adjourned the meeting at approximately 8:45 P.M. TOWN OF LOS GATOS PLANNING COMMISSION
April 20, 2004 Phil Micciche, Vice Chair APPROVED AS TO FORM AND ATTEST: BudN. Lortz Director of Community Development N:\DEV\ADMINSEC\PCACTIONMIN\PC4-20-04.min.wpd
Planning Commission -April 20, 2004 Council Chambers 6:00:02 PM Micciche meeting. Roll Call: all present except Commissioner !Drexel. No verbal
communications. There is not a quorum for litem #1; asked Town Attorney for advice. �
�... ......········,·· , 1amending the Town Code to modify the personal
service !business regulations in the C-2 (Central Business District) zone. 11t has been determined that this project could not have a impact on the environment,
therefore, the projeCt is Inot subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (Section 115061 (b)(3)). APPLICANT:
Town of Los Gatos !(Continued from Apri/14, 2004) �
� 1 item was continued. There
is not a quorum again tonight 1 1and it is recommended that the item be continued to April 28, ........................................1.. _.. _ _.._-_ . 6:03:18 PM
Micciche to continue to April 28, 2004. Seconded by 1 1Commissioner Trevithick and passed 6-0. .. ..·......·-....lAniTC
ipate··ihaTacfion"'can"·be"take·n··o,,"·Api-iT2·S:"The·a:ct'ion·'WfiT"·"''' 1 1be similar to What is proposed tonight where the meeting will be 1 1adjourned, the minutes prepared and
a new meeting held to ..................._ ...1. _.... .... _ _ _..__.._.m 6:04:34 PM Micciche 11tem #2 -14300 Winchester
Boulevard -Planned . Application PD-04-4 -Requesting to modify an 1approved Planned Developmentrelating to the allowed square !footage of office space on property
zoned CM:PD. An to the Environmental Impact Report will be prepared 1in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act. 1APN 424-32-068. 1PROPERTY OWNER/APPLICANT:
Sobrato Development ICompanies ..6:04:·S'S'·PMtJohn··Shenk-·..·........·IFis..re..·wi"tti..·s·e·ve'j·-aTCiTHerent·ha:ts·:··One"·jS·as··a·fan"ot"'N·etli'ix:·"ji;·s·..a..·· I -!compliment
to the Town that Netflix wants to stay here. Netflix significant tax benefit and is a high profile company with 1presence in the Town. Showed exhibits comparing
the project ! !approved in January 2004 with current proposal. Clarified that 1 1every change is between Winchester Blvd and the shared drive between the office and residential.
Exhibits contrastthe I Ibuilding footprints, driveway entrance and the elevations.
1feet. Staff and the Consulting Architect are suggesting an I lincrease to 52 feet. Attachment 5 4/20/2004 1 of 7
Planning Commission -April 20, 2004 Council Chambers 6:12:09 PM !John Shenk jThe reason for the added height is to meetthe needs of Netflix. :. lThe space between the floors is used
for hvac, wiring, etc. Roof .:' jmounted HVAC units need to be screened. If the height can be !lower, that will be done. Need the flexibility to go that high. From ; Ian environmental
impact standpoint, there is no traffic impact./t ! lis less than the original projectand more than the approved. I IVolume of building is still less than the original project and more
Ii !than the approved. Site population is alsoless than the original, Imore than the approved. ..·6:·1·5":S·S..PM'lC"o·m·mTssi'o·ii·er·..····'·wi'if'Netf"iix··m·ake·th"ei"r..pre·se·ntatio·j1..·j1·ow:
..·····..· . jQuintana j ..·6:·1·6·:0·6..P..iV1'lB'avi(n:.jyman......·..·....I'G·e·ii·eraf'co·u·j1sei"fo·;:..Netfiix:....introducecfSarry..McCart'i'y:..C·FO;·..·..·.. 1 land Denise Helm,
Facilities Manager. Thanked the Commission I Ifor considering this. Here tonight to answer any questions but I ldon't havea presentaqtion planned. i ..·6:'frrfpM··fc·h·ail"'Ki1TcCi'c'iie'....·..·I
'As'ked..a'b'o'liTs·p·ace·..jJ·e·tween..f'ioor·aii·cTceiHj1·g-and·'why..it""needs..·..· j Ito be increased. Mr. Shenk explained the need for interstitial ! !space for mechanica.l equipment,
cables, etc. Its a combination I lof two things that may require a height increase. Need to make 1 lsure there is adequate space for equipment between floors and I lneed to have adequate
area for rooftop equipment to be 1 1screened. ..·6:2D':·oo..prvdc·ommissi'oii·er·..·..·......p·roposaf'reiate..to·ap·provecfdesi'g·j1·:..·Mr·:..·S'hs·j1·j(_· ·..·
.. ITalesfore . jresponded. Chair Micciche clarified request. ..·6:22·:'1'"1"·PNi'Tsud.."Lo·rtz....·......·......·..·..'!'Ci'ear'iy·th·e..hei'gh"t"ofthe"'biJTidiii'gs"'h'as"'be'en"an"issue':"'So'b'ra
t0·;........ I 1Netflix and staff understand that. Staff will work with the j japplicant and Netflix to keep the increase as minimal as I lpossible. The human eye does not pick up a
difference with a ! !two to two and a half foot increase. A five foot increase is I lprobably noticable. Another aspect that can be looked at is the 1 1finished elevation on the site.
-S:24:34F"iiiflcoiTiiliissioneriAskedaliOuliiObr1ieigliis'd!ici'eaSfriQaSYou-go"up:Mr:"Sheiik" iTalesfore isaid that consultants eva.luating this have said that they need l lthis amount
of space between floors. Don't think that we will end ! jup with a building that i549'5" tall. ..·........I'i5urin·g"A&·s·";:ecj"ue
sted"that'''g'rounci''sou'rc'e'''heati'ii'g'''and''cooi'ing'....... lSurke lbe used to eliminate the need for large rooftop units. Could that I lbe used to lower the height. It is one
of the best green things ! !that you can do in the heating and cooling because it is so l lenergyefficient. Mr. Shenk said that the design of the buildings at Netflix' discretion.
1
jmansard that is architecturally in proportion to the building. I I 4/20/2004 2 of 7
Planning Commission -April 20, 2004 Council Chambers 6:28:39 PM lCommissioner iO'Donnell -TI"me-,· Speaker' ."",.'":"',, .. ' ..:",,-' -,,'-, Note .." -'" " . . , ,. , '" , -.-. -..
- " ",' lThe question is whether the building is too high. Chair Micciche lagreed and noted that an increase of 51/2 feet is being If we have issues with
it, we should leave it to the !people who know whatto do to make sure it gets reduced to the 1minimum amount. ··6:29·:45"·PM·'fC·om·mTssion·er··-··lOoes·pro·p·osa·j""as·cur·rentiy·submittecraccom·mod
at"e·til·e··· _. IQuintana !mechanical equipment (yes). Asked Netflix to explain its I !operation; number of employees, distribution centers, etc. ·-6:3'f:·sff"PM..t·sarry..McCarthy......·j·CFc
5"Of·..Netflix:..Opera·tio·ns.."fnT:os..G·atos:..consis"t"'prima·rli'y·of..·.........._· 1 . development, software for shipping and billing. No 1
is done from Los Gatos facility. Have a number of I !shipping facilities facilities including one in San Jose. Currently have j two million subscribers. Have plans to expand
to the UK j this year. Currently have about 150 employees in Los 1 iGatos and see that growing to about 550 employees by 2010.. I !Provided anticipated revenue and projected
growth continue. E .. ..lyiie··faiioff..·oftraHicl·s..I)·ased'·o·j1..·ths..·premi'se;-ihai"tilTs..ls..to..bs-a-...._·
headquarters. Mr. Shenk clarified that the analysis I lshowed what the traffic would be if occupied by general office 1 up to four
tenants. If the project is occupied by a single I !user, corporate headquarters, the traffic generation is lower. "'6:3'9:2';C-PM"fc'ommi'ssTOne"i'-"'-I'My'u'nderstand"fng"ls-ihai"'for"envTro'n
"mentai-purp'oses'you-usecr-' !Quintana lthe worst case scenario but for project analysis you used the I lbest case. ..6:39·:·S9-·PM'TSucfCo·rtz···..·_..·..·..·-..-TWe-workea..unde·;:-·worst"·case·-s
c·e·narlo;..we·-a·iways..'do:....·i't..is·-_.._....._... lvaluable information that the Commission understand that i·f Netflix occupies this site there is a decrease in traffic. There
is big difference between fourtenants and a single tenant and thought that was compelling. Mr. Shenk noted that the traffic is less than the original project
and the other numbers !have been provided by staff for information. All of the traffic !analysis is based on general office with no limit on the number jOf tenants. PO limits to four
tenants. ..6·:Lj:"1":·S':2"pr\inC·ommi'ssTo·ner..·..· rAiso..feefiTis..very..fortunate..t"ii·at'"Netliix..wa·nts..io..·stay..lnT:os..·..· .. If in 2012 Netflix
needs more space, would Sobrato !entertain reconfiguring the site? Mr. Shenk said they will always I !consider anything. Have torn down buildings that are 10 years Commissioner
Burke asked Netflix where they expect to be 1 lin 2012. ..·6:43·:·S·0..PM·-t-sa·rry..McCariiiy..· !·To..·co·niinue..to""i)'s"'pro'pse'rous'"i"n''2'o'1''2;'''antlC'ipat"e'''havlii'g''a'''
.. . lcorporate campus, possibly by expanding into the campus on lthe adjacent property. If we can accommodate our growth in that would be our first choice. Commissioner
Burke !asked about employee makeup. Mr. McCarthy said they !currently have three administrative employees in Los Gatos. 4/20/2004 3 of?
Planning Commission -April 20, 2004 Council Chambers, 6:46:11-PM i.Denise Helm lin response to a question from Commissioner Burke, confirmed !that need more space for cables and ducting.
Commissioner j asked about the Ii !would be willing to worknweiethd afolroacafrledeewsiagynseirgtno adnedsigifnNetflix lsomething appropriate. Ms. Helm said absolutely.
···6:47·:3S'·pr\iffsud..'Co·rtz..·······..········,'Respondecfto;'q'u'es'tio"ii]rom"CommEiision'er'Talesfore'·t"h·iif..········· signs are not allowed by the Sign
Ordinance. It could be !allowed through the Planned Development, and Netflix.has I !agreed to design something tasteful. This is a reflection of the lTown of Los Gatos. ..·6:·49·j..:;YPM..!CO·m
·missio·n·e'r......·....I·Noted..'th·ad5onsui'tii1'g"A'rch'ite'ct"sai'd"s'lg'ns"sh'ould"be"kept"low:......... !
....·....··....· !Trevithick
!through the site will be maintained. Mr. Shenk said the I !narrowest point of the courtyard is between an exterior stairwell 1 !and the other bUilding. It might affect the vi<?w through
and is ! !something we can work on. ·.. ..1c·om·mlssio·n·er··....·..·I'[es·s..concer·ne'd..about"t·he..si'ig'h't"ch·ange'i'n..·the..courtYard:..·More......· IQuintana
!concerned that due to it shifting the view corridor through the ...........................................1.. .. .. .. 6:52:43
PM lChair Micciche. !Asked why the applicant wants to drop the $50,000 contribution· I Ito traffic improvements from the community benefits. Mr. Shenk ! !explained rationale. Chair Micciche
expressed his disagreement IWith reducing the community benefit. Continued conversation 1 labout the sidewalk and community benefits.
I !condition for the sidewalk contribution. Explained that staff is not !adverse
to eliminating wheel stops or continuous curbs in I !garages, but don't want to see wheel stops in surface parking I lareas. Mr. Shenk said that there will be some breaks for runoff.
"7':03:26Piii1+rVir-:-SfiSili<--4InresPOriseiOii"queSliOOfrOmcommisSkiiierfaiiiSidie:-Mr-:--- explained that they are working toward a lease with
Currently have a letter of intent. ChairMicciche clarified 1 !that a lease is required prior to bUilding permit. Mr. Lortz . ! !provided tentative terms of the lease. Additional discussion
on lthe lease. ..t·COmmi'ssi·o·n·er"""·"·I·Prop·osed"·com·m·u'ter..·j)·us..between..Ca·m'b·e'j'i"and..t'ii's·..p·rope·rtY..:........·.. ITalesfore !will
it run with the lease? Mr. Shenk said that it runs runs with the !Iand and is not limited by the lease. . : 4/20/2004 4 of 7
Planning Commission -April 20, 2004_ Council Chambers 7:07:50 PM 1Gommissioner iAsked about Ecopass provisions. Mr. Shenk clarified. ICommissioner
Burke asked how the process works. Mr. Shenk that there are different programs available with VTA. He that Ecopasses will be provided for any and all
full-time lemp/oyees who request it.
..·..··..······ ··7:·1·0·:41'"·pIi1..ic·ji·ai"r..i\i1i·cCiche..·..·..To·p·s·ji·ed..pubi"ic·heari"ji·g·: No..o·ne..p·resent·to..s
pea·j(·:· · . ·..7:·ffos··pj\JjTCo·mmi"ssi"oji·er·..···TAskecf"it""a·..compiete..traHj"C"·m·itigatfon..study..ilas·been··don.. sji·e.. 1Ta/esfore iasked about the Charter Oaks
concern. ..·7:·ff":·s·i)"pj\Jj..f"Keviri·..ROhanj· j"A..co·mp·iete·Traffic·study·was....fji·e..fowji..·is·..wo·rkTji·g..·witji .. ...................................._L _
___ ..I.9... ..9..... _ _ _ _.._.. 7:12:29 PM-iCommissioner iAsked Netflix where they might be in five
years and how that lBurke irelates to the Town. Mr. McCarthy said as acorporate entity, 1Netflix should not be expected to be leading community efforts. jCommunity service is a personal
decision. Netf/ix collects a use jtax from California clients and pays income tax to the State. lCommissioner Burke clarified that he was asking how the icompany would fit into Los Gatos
in the future, not about contributions. Mr. McCarthy said he is a resident of jthe Town. Have monthly meetings in the Theater and have Imeetings at local restaurants.
"7:1"6':4Efpj\Jj'lc'ommissioji'er-"''''''!'Provided"''so'rris''jnformation'she"receTvecraS-a-'rE3"s"iJ"iiofqu'estTons" 1Quintana 1to staff. In her opinion the originally approved project
ceased to . lexist when the modified zoning was approved. Will focus on the jchanges from the approved and proposed project. Three areas jto be considered: the adequacy of the CEQA review
and the 1merits of the project. The fiscal issue is not one that the jCommission should be involved in. Will focus on the project's 1merits and which project is the best fpr the Town.
Noted jreductions/increases associated with proposed project versus jthe approved (2004) project. Her conclusion is that the current jproject exclusive of the fiscal impacts is the better
project. ICEQA should address the differences between the projects, but jshouldalso conclude that there are not additional impacts. Not lsure an addendum is appropriate. All the impacts
have not been !adequately addressed. These changes are significant and are Inot consistent with CEQA guidelines. ·..7:29:·2rpj\Jj·TBudTo·rtz..·..·..·..· ·
..·Thj·nk..iti·s..·inte·res"iTn·g.."j)·u"t"not..com..peii"ing·:·..·H"a,Tan .. 1 . jenvironmental consultant assist in preparation of the document. j \The certified EIR was based on the
original project. 1 ·..7·j·1":4s..p·M·'f'orry"Kor'b ·,,· tciarifl·ed"thai..t·h·s..·Commls·s·loni·S..·roie..·is..maki"n·g..a· ·..·..· " ".." .. 1 irecommendatrion on the project and
on the CEQA document. I 4/20/2004 5 of 7
Planning Commission -April 20, 2004 Council Chambers> 7:32:13 PM lCommissioner 11dea of comparing this project to the project that was first jO'Donnell lapproved is helpful. The project
except for the height issues i; lappears to be a good project with good benefits, adequately levaluated for CEQA. Would be a benefit for the Town. : ·..7:34·:·6"S..PM·fc·bm·m·issl·o·n·e·r·····..IV
Vhen"f'e'ilow"commls'sloners"say"we"sh'oui'dn';i"'iook"'afthe··..····.....·..·..· !Burke leconomic impact they are being very short sighted. Need to 1 lhave jobs. Have a chance to keep
one of our own in Town. 1 IMotion to make a recommendation to approve PD-04-4 with ! !COt:lditions shown in desk item with the following changes: 1. 1 lstaff is to use all mechanisms
to work with the applicant to bring i lheight back down to 49'6'.2. Add "through year" to condition on Hease requirement. 3. Applicant to work with tenant to use wheel !stops where fittor
underground parking (none in surface parking lareas). 4. Freeway sign is important for a company like Netflix. ISign shall not be backlit and Netflix shall work with local quality ldesigner
to develop sign. Sign should come back to ICommission. 5. Community benefits shall be maintained. 6. lSidewalk condition shall be included as modified by 1staff/applicant. 7. All dirt
shall be trucked off the site. Motion !seconded by'Commissioner O'Donnell. Community benefit is ,immeasurable. i ..·7:39·:'5's..PM·lc·o·m·mi'ssi'o·n·er· j·prbJect"dembnstrates..·excei'ience..ln·..des
i'ij'il·: · · .. jTrevithick I ..·7:40':·2'O'·PM·"tC'o,m·mlssi'bne·r· ·..·IAimost"'a:F"tii·e..pbi'n"twhe·re..we·do·n·ifhave·enbug't'·..com·m·un·iiY .. lTalesfore lbenefit. Should be
proportionate to increase in density. I 'Suggested including improvments .at Lark & Charter Oaks, but 1 IWill leave that up to Council. ..·7:4'1":·rrPM·'lC'ommi'ssi'o,n·er..........j·Few..more..�
� lQuintana IGeneral Plan
than previous project. HaUling the dirt off the site 1 lhas not been analyzed sufficiently. Recommend that Council go 1 lback and listen to comments. Not opposed to project, but time
1 lframe has beenso compressed there has not been time to I !address everything. ...........................................1 .!.. , .. 7:43:27 PM lChair Micciche ICalled for the question.
Motion passed 5-1 (Commissioner I· lQuintana dissenting). No sub-committee report. No Director's ..·Y:44·:3·S..PM'TIt'ii'aIr..MicClchs ·..T!rMepeeotri'tn.·g..adJou·rne·ii..· · · · ·
· ·..· · . ..·7:5Ei':'52..PM··fc'il·aIr..Mi'cCi'chs · '!'Meeti'n·g..caIied..tb"o·rdsr·for"ap·p·rovai"·of'Actibn"·Me·e'tfng..·ti'jl'inute5..·..·.. ! lfor previous hearing. ·..7:57·:'6S..PM"lC'o·miliTs
si'o·n·sr..........·IHbw·wii'i..·m·bditisd..cbnditi'on·s..·b's..forwarded..'to..CounciI..·M·r:..'[ortz·..·.. !Burke lexplained that the FTR log notes and CD's will be provided to I lCouncil.
In addition an addendum will be prepared tomorrQw. ...........................................1. ..I .. 8:01 :32 PM 1Chair Micciche 1Motion to approve action minutes made by Commissioner
1 10'Donnell. Motion was seconded by Commissioner Burke and I lapproved 6..0. 4/20/2004 6 of 7
Planning Commission -April 20, 2004 Council Chambers 4/20/2004 ? of?