Staff Report - Blossom Hill Manor No. 11
DATE: TO: FROM: COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT MARCH 17, 2004 MAYOR AND TOWN COUNCIL DEBRA J. FIGONE, TOWN MANAGER MEETING DATE: 03/18/04 SUBJECT: ADOPT A RESOLUTION MAKING FINDINGS CONCERNING
THE VALUE OF WRITTEN PROTESTS FILED AND NOT WITHDRAWNAND ORDERING TEEREORGANIZATION OF THE TERRITORYKNOWNAS BLOSSOM HILL MANORNO. 11, AND SET AN ELECTION. RECOMMENDATION: A-dopta resolution
making findings concerning the value ofwritten protest filed and not withdrawn and ordering the reorganization ofthe territory known as Blossom Hill Manor No. 11, and set an election,
either: a. Concurrent with the November 2004 General Election, or· b. Through a mailed ballot election conducted by the Santa Clara County Registrar ofVoters on the last Tuesday in August,
2004. BACKGROUNJ): , Some ofthe residents ofBlossom Hill Manor approached the ToWn in early 2003 with a request to . annex their property to the Town. Aboundary for the annexation was
determined, which includes 31 properties. The annexation process regarding this area, known known for annexation purposes as Blossom Hill Manor No. 11, has been underway since December
15,2003when the Town Council set the date for consideration ofthe annexation. PREPARED BY: PAMELA JACOBS Assistant Town Manager N:\MGR\PJacobs\Council Reports\BH annexation.wpd Reviewed
by: _----'Assistant Town Manager __Community Development . Reformatted: 5/30/02 f}//Town Attorney __Clerk 5'(·Yinance Revised: 3/17/04 3:08 pm
PAGE 2 SUBJECT: ADOPT ARESOLUTION MAKING FINDINGS CONCERNING THE VALUE OF WRITTEN PROTESTS AND NOT WITHDRAWNAND ORDERING THE REORGANIZATION
OF THE TERRlTORY KNOWN AS BLOSSOM HILL MANOR NO. 11, AND SET FOR AN ELECTION. MARCH 17, 2004 The date to hear protests regarding the annexation was ultimately set for February 17, 2004,
due to an error by the newspaper publishing the public hearing notice which was originally set for Jan-iIary . 20,2004. 'On February 17th, the Town Council held the public and set March
15,2004 as date to make findings ofthe value ofwritten protests filed and not withdrawn and to take the appropriate action as prescribed by California Government Code Section
57075. --. The prescribed action was to order the change of organization subject to a confirmation by' the registered voters residing within the affected territory. The staff recommendation
was for the annexation election to be consolidated with the November 2004 General Election, than being conducted via a postcard election. At the March 15th meeting, the
Town Council requested that the election be conducted :via a postcard election unless there were sufficient reasons to consolidate it with the General Election. Because the recommended
resolution called for the election Via the 2004 General Election, Council could not taJ<:e action on the resolution at thatineeting. TheCalifomia Government Code requires
that the findings concerning the value ofwritten protests filed and not withdrawn be made within 30 days ofthe public hearing to hear protests. In this, case, the public hearing was
held February 17,2004; thus, the specialTown COlUlcil'llleeting ofMafch 18,2004 has been scheduled for this purpose. DISCUSSION: At the March 15th Councilmeeting, the Council asked questions
regarding the postcard election that staffwas p.ot able to answer. This information is provided herein to the Council in making a decision regarding the election process
they would like to undertake. Since the March 15th Council meeting, the Clerk's Office has discussed this matter with the Registrar ofVoters. The Clerk has learned that the last time
the Registrar used the postcard election process for an annexation was for the Town ofLos Gatos in 1991, and thatthe Registrar not longer uses this process. Rather, the choices ate consolidation
with a General Election or by a mailed baIlot election, since there are no more than 1,000 registered voters eligible to participate. Previously, the postcard election was conducted
by the Town following requirements set forth by the Registrar. The mailed ballot is conducted by the Registrar, and is subject to the scheduling set forth in the Election Code. According
to the Election Code, mailed ballot elections can occur on the following dates: 1) The first Tuesday after the first Monday in May; 2) The first Tuesday after the first Monday in June;
or 3) The last Tuesday in August.
PAGE 3 MAYOR AND TOWN COUNCIL SUBJECT: ADOPT A RESOLUTION MAKING FINDINGS CONCERNING THE VALUE OF WRlTTEN PROTESTS FILED AND NOT WITHDRAWNAND ORDERING THE REORGANIZATION OF THE TERRlTORY
KNOWN AS BLOSSOM HILL MANOR NO. 11, AND SET FOR AN ELECTION. MARCH 17,2004 For purposes of this election, the last Tuesday in August is the only time the election could be conducted.
This is due to the California Government Code regarding annexations which requires the electionto be held no sooner than 88 days after the findings are made. The August date is the first·
date that meets that requirement. According to estimates provided by the County's Registrar's office, the costs for the two processes . are similar. If the election is held as part of
the General Election, the Town would pay for the . additional costs associated with the ballot pages pertaining to the annexation on top ofthe minimum ·costs ofthe election. This additional
cost is estimated at $9,300. The Clerk has also learned that the minimum costs of elections are rising significantlyfrom the $7,000 to $10,000 cost of previous elections. The minimum
costs are now expected to be $38,000 to $57,000. Thisis due to election rising election costs that are being down to the counties ·from the state. The Registrar will not
know the actual costs until later in the year. Ifthe election is heldthrough a mailed ballot, the Registrar has informed the Clerk that the Registrar cOl:L1d conduct the election at
a cost of between $5,000 and $10,000. In this process, the mailed ballot is mailed to all registered voters in the affected area with a return envelope to the Registrar. The Registrar
is unable to provide a more exact estimate at this time. CONCLUSION: Both ofthe attached resolutions make the findings to support ordering the change of organization subject to a confirmation
by the register,ed voters residing within the affected territory .The . resolution included as Attachment 1 sets the election to be conducted concurrently with the November 2004 General
Election. The resolution included as Attachment 2 sets the election to be conducted as a mailed ballot election on August 31, 2004, the last Tuesday in August as required by the Election
Code. The costs associated with conducting the election with the General Election is $9,300 andthe costs associated with conducting the mailed ballot election is between $5,000 and $10,000.
The action before Council isto adopt one ofthe two resolutions that make the findings and set the election. ..
PAGE 4 . . SUBJECT: ADOPT A RESOLUTION MAKING FINDINGS CONCERNING THE VALUE OF WRITTEN PROTESTS FILED AND NOT WITHDRAWN AND ORDERlNG THE REORGANIZATION
OF THE TERRITORY KNOWN AS BLOSSOM HILL . MANOR NO. 11, AND SET FORAN ELECTION. MARCH 17, 2004 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: Is not a project defined under CEQA, and no further action is
required. I FISCAL IMPACT: The direct costs associated with the resolution in Attachment 1 is $9,3()0 and the direct associated with the resolution in Attachment 2 is between
$5,000 and $10,000.. bnpleinentationof either resolution Will require stafftime to post notices and provideinformation to the neighborhood affected by the annexation election. Funds
fo; this election will be incorporated into the FY2004/05 recommendedTown Clerk budget. If the reorganization is approved by eligible voters, once it is certified by the State Board
of Equalization, the Town will receive approximately 9.6% ofthe property taxes paid on property in the affected area. The Townwill provideTown services to the affected area at an undetermined
cost. Attachments: 1. Resolution making findings on the value ofwritten protests filed and not withdrawn in certain inhabited territory designated as "BlOSSom Hill Manor No. 11" and
setting the aI1J1exation election to be conducted concurrently with the November 2004 General Election (with Exhibit A and B): A.. Description ofBlossom Hill MaI}or No. 11 Annexation
B. Map to accompany description 2. Resolution making findings on the value of written protests filed and not withdrawn in certain inhabited territory designated as "Blossom Hill Manor
No. 11" and setting the annexation election to be conducted through a mailed ballot election on the last Tuesday ofAugust, 2004 (with Exhibit A and B): A. Description ofBlossom Hill
Manor No. 11 Annexation B. Map to accompany description
PAGE 5 MAYOR AND TOWN COUNCIL. SUBJECT: ADOPT A RESOLUTION MAKING FINDINGS CONCERNING THE VALUE OF WRITTEN PROTESTS FILED AND NOT WITHDRAWN AND ORDERING THE REORGANIZATION OF THE TERRITORY
KNOWN AS BLOSSOM HILL MANOR NO. 11, AND SET FOR AN ELECTION. MARCH 17, 2004 Distribution: NeelimaPalacherla, Executive Officer, Santa Clara County Local Agency Formation Commission,
County Government Center, East Wing, 70 W. Hedding Street, 11th Floor, SanJose, CA 95110 Tim Chow, Director, Environmental Resources Agency, CountjrGovernment Center, East Wing, 70 W.
Hedding Street, 7th Floor, San Jose, CA 95110' Gay Strand, Manager for Administrative Services, County Library Service Area, 1095 NorthFirst StI:eet, San Jose, CA 95112 Carol Gruetzner,
16192 Oleander Ave., Los Gatos, CA 95032 (contacted for pick-up) Larry Gerston, 16194 Lilac Lane, Los Gatos, CA 95032 (contacted for pick-up) Eleanor Gallmeister, 16210 Lilac Lane, Los
Gatos, CA 95032 (contacted for pick-up) .,..
RESOLUTION. RESOLUTION OF THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF LOS GATOS MAKING FINDINGS ON THE VALUE OF WRITTEN PROTESTS FILED· AND NOT WITHDRAWN IN CERTAIN INHABITED TERRITORY DESIGNATED
AS BLOSSOM HILL MANORNO. 11 .TO THE TOWN OF LOS GATOS WHEREAS, a petition for the annexation ofcertain territory to the Town ofLas Gatos and detachment ofsaid territory from Santa Clara
County Library Service Area No.1, consisting of8.71 , acres on the southerly side ofOleander Avenue and the northerly side ofLilac Lane (APN'S: 52313-013 to 043, 523-13-053 to 063, 523-13-065,
523-26-032 to 037) has been filed by Carol Gruetzner; and WHEREAS, on December 15,2003, the Town Council adopted Resolution No. 2003-142 initiating proceedings for annexation ofthe area
designated as Blossom Hill Manor No. I I; and . '.' . . . WHEREAS, Section 56757ofthe California Government Code states that the Local Agency Formation Commission shall not review an
annexation proposal to any City in Santa Clara County ofUnincorporated territory which is within the Urban service area ofthe city ifinitiated byresolution ofthe legislative body and
there the Town Council ofthe Town ofLos Gatos is now the conduction authority for said annexation; and WHEREAS, the TownofLos Gatos notified affected propertyowners byposting, publishing
and mailing hearing, notices pursuant to Sections 57025 and 57026 of the Government Code; received protests pursuant to Section 57051 ofthe Government Code, held a hearing on February
17,2004, pursuant to Section 57050 ofthe Government Code, closed the hearing on February 17, 2004, and set March 15, 2004 as the date detennine the value of written protests filed and
not withdrawn and take an action as described in Section 57075 ofthe Government Code ofthe. State. of California; RESOLVED by the Town Council ofthe Town ofLos Gatos that the following
findings are true and correct: 1. The project is categorically exempt from C.E.Q.A. ClassNo. 15319(a). 2. The territory is "Inhabited" as defined in Section56046 ofthe Goveri:rrnent
Code ofthe State of California.. 3. The territory is contiguous to existing Town Limits. 4. The territory is within the Town's urban service area as adopted by the Local Agency Fonnation
Commission of Santa Clara County. 5. The proposal does not split line of assessment or ownership. 6. The proposed annexation does not create islands or areas in which it would be difficult
to provide municipal services. 7. The proposal in consistent with the Town's adopted general plan. C:\Documents and Settings\pjacobs\Local
General Election.wpd ATTACHMENT 1 1
8. The reason for the proposed annexation is to properly plan and provide municipal service to the area which is contiguous to the Town. 9. That the County Surveyor has determined that
the boundaries ofthe proposed anriexationare definite and certain. 10. The protest filed and not withdrawn by property owners is more thap. 25 percent of the number ofowners oflanclwho
also own at least 25 percent ofthe assessed value ofthe land within the affected territory; and RESOLYED, by the Town Council ofthe Town ofLos Gatos, a municipal corporation of the County
ofSanta Clara, State ofCalifornia, that pursuant to the provisions ofSections 57075 and 57115 ofthe Government Code ofthe State ofCalifornia, the annexation to the Town ofLos Gatos'
ofthat territory designated as Blossom Hill Manol; No. 11, anddescribed in real property description and map attached hereto, marked EXhibits j'A"and JIB Ii, respectively, is approved,
subject toa conformation ofthe voters by ballot to be conducted concurrently with the November 2004 General Election. Election proceeding shall be conducted by.the Santa Clara County
Registrar ofVoters. FINALLY RESOLVED, that upon confrrmation ofthese annexation proceedings by an election, the territory annexed wiII be taxed on the regUlar county assessment roll
in ToWn ofLos Gatos Tax Rate A, excluding taxes for existing bonded indebtedness. . PASSED AND ADOPTED at a special meeting of the Town Council held on March 18, 2004 by the following
vote: COUNCIL MEMBERS: AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: . SIGNED: MAYOR OF THE TOWN OF LOS GATOS LOS GATOS, CALIFORNIA ATTEST: CLERK OF THE TOWN OF LOS GATOS LOS GATOS, CALIFORNIA C:IDocuments
and Settings\pjacobslLocal SettingslTEMPIReso-ConcJusion General Election.wpd 2
" . ---_..-------_._._---. EXHIBITA. ANNEXATION TOTmt TOWNOF LOS GATOS ENTITLED BLOSSOM MANOR NO. 11.' ALL OF THE REAL PROPER.1Y SITUATE IN SANTA CLARA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA _BEJNGMORE
PARTICULARLY BOUNDEDAND DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNlNG AT1HES'OUIHBASTERN CORNEROF.Lot424'AS SHOWNONlHAT eBaTAIN' MAI'-ISNTIThED"'iRACTNO. 862, BLOSSOMHILL MANOR;lJNIT NO.4" AS FltEDINBOOK380FMAPS·:
ATPAGES5,6AND7,SANl'ACLARACOUN1Y :,_",' " -.'_, ' ::t ..•. ",' :.,' RECORDS, SAID coRN:ERMSO BBINGONTHEBOUNDARYLINE OFTHE. _ ANNEJ(ATION TOTHE TOWNOFLOS GATOS ENTITLED "BLOSSOM HILLR,.OAD
NO. S";1HENCEPROCBBDlNGALONG SAID BOUNDARYLINE.AND1HE SOunmRN BOl.JNDARY OF sAiDTRACTNO..862· . 1) 56'15" WEST FEETTO ANIRON PIPE INTHE cENTER. LINE
. 2) NOR1H 89° 59'wEST 351.24 FEETTOmESOU1HERN CO}.fMON coRNER. OF . LOTS 414AND 415 OFSAlD 1RACT;THENCEWAVINGnIEBOUNDARYLINE OFnmANNExATION TOTHETOWNOF LOS GATOS
ENl'ITLED"BLOSSOM FmLROADNO. 8"AND ALONG:THE BOUNDARYLINE OFTHEANNExATION TOTHETOWN OFLOS GATOS ENUTLl3D"BLOSSOM'Jm.L . AND ALONGTHE CO)..IMONBOUNDARYOF SAIDLOTs
414AND 415AND THE ExrENSION·1'HBREOF . _ . '3) NORTH0° 01'EAST A POINTONtHB'SOtrrnERNBOUNDARY OFLoT398 OFSAll> TRAer; TIlENCE ALONG1HBLASTSAID SOUTHERN BOUNDARY
. . .. . . 4) NORTH8gG'S9"WEST 32.09l"'EErTOlHESOtm:IElmCOMMON CORNEROF . LOTS 398 AND 399 OF SAID TRACT; nIENCEALONG THECOMMON BOVNDARy'OF SAID LOTS 398 AND 399· 5) NORlH0° OIlEAST
102.46FEETTOlHENORnIERN COMMONCORNEROF SNDLOTS 398 AND 399;lHENCEALONGmENORlHERN BOUNDARYOF SAl[) LOT 399 .' .' 6)- 59'WEST 3.00FEETTOANIRON PIPE ATTIlE SOIJTfJERN COMMONCORNEROF
PARCEL "A" AND PARCEL SAID PARCELS ARE SHOWN UPONmATCERTAlNMAP FILED IN BOOK 484 OF MAPS, ATPAGE 49, SANTA CLARA·COUNTYRECORDS; lHENCE LEAVlNG1HEBOUNDARY LINE OFnmANNEXAll0NTOTIlE
ToWN OF LOS GATOS ENTITLED . "BLOSSOMHILLMANOR 3M AND ALONGTHE BOUNDARY LINE OF THE ANNEXATIONTOnmTOWNOF LOS GATOS ENTITLED "BLOSSOMID:Ii MANORNO.4" AND ALONG THE COMMON BOUNDARY
OF SAID PARCEL itA" AND PARCEL "B" 7) NORm 19° 25M WEST 24.35 FEET TO A CmSELED "X" IN A CONCRETE WALK; THENCE .. 8) NORlH 0° 01-EAST 38.25 FEETTO A CHISELED 'Xll INACONCRETE WALK-,
THENCE 9) NORTH 31 0 37-301t EAST 15.26 FEEfTO AN IRON PlPE; THENCE
10) NORlHOo 01' EAST 26.00.FEETtO AN IRONPIPE'ATTHE NORnIERN COMMONCORNER-OF SAID PARc.a "A" AND PARCEL ''B'' ON1HE SOUTHERNLINE OF OLEANDERAVENuE; lHENCE iEAviNG lHE BOUNDARYLINE. OF
THE ANNEXATION TO TIIE·TOWN OFLOS GATOS ENTITLED "BLOSSOMFBLL MANORNO. 4" AND ALONG'THE BOUNDARY LINE OF nmANNEXATION TO TIm TOWN OF LOS GATOS ENTITLED . "BLOSSOMHILLMANORNO. 10" '"
11) NORTH 1°.22' 04" WEST 60.02 FEETTO THENORlHERNLINE OF OLEANDER " AVENUE; lHENCE LEAVING TIm BOUNDARYLINE OF 1HEANNExATION' TO tHETOWNOFLOS GATOS "BLOSSOM FULL MANORNO..10"
12) EASTERLYALONGA NON-TANGENT CUItVECONCAVB TO TIm NORmwEsTFROMA RADIAL BEARING OF SOU1HO°C)}'WEST HAVINGA RADWS OF20.00 FEETTHiWUGHA CENTRALANGLBOF 90° 00' ANARC . DISTANCE OF31.42
FEETTOA POINTONTHB\VESTERNLINEOF AZALEA. . " " WAY; 1HENCE . . 13) SOUIH89° 59'EAST 60.00 FEEtTO A POINT ON1H5 EASTERNLINE OF AZALEA WAY;·THENCE . ". 14jSOlJTHERLYALONGANON-TANGENT CURVECONCAVE
TO1l:IE .NORTHEAsTFROMA RADIAL BEARING QFNORmItAVINGA RADWS OF 20.00 FEETTHROUGHA CENTRAL ANGLE OF90° 00' ANARC DISTANCE OF31.42 FEET;1HENCEALONG1HENORTHERNLiNE
OF . OLEANDE1tAVENUE" . 15) SOUIH89° 59' 'HAST 164JJO FEET; TI:lENCE . "16) ALONGA NON-TANGENT·CuR."VE CONCAVB TO1HE . . NOR"IHWESTFROMARADIAL BEARING OF SOU1'IIOo Ol'WEST
HAVlNGA RADWS OF FEET TH'ROUGHACENTRAL ANGLE OF 90° 00' ANARC DISTANCE OF31.42 FEETiOAPOINTOFlHEWESTERNLINEOF JAcA.R.ANDA WAY; 1HBNCE : . . 17) SOU"IH 890 S9' EAST 60.00 FSErTOAPOINTOF
lHE EASTERNLINE OF JACARANDA wAy;lHENCE' '. . 18)SOUTHERLYALONGANON-TANGENTCURVE CONCAVE TO1l:IE NORTHEASTFROMA RADIAL OFNORm89° 59" WEsT HAVINGA RADIUS OF 20.00 FEEl'lHROUGHA
CENTRAL ANGLE OF 900 00' AN.ARc . DISTANCE OF3].42 FEET; TIfENCEALONG TIlE NORTIIERN LINE OF . OLEANDERAVENUE . 19)-SOUTH89° 59' EAST 170.00FEET; lHENCE . . 20) EASTERLYALONG A NON-TANGENT
CURVE CONCAVE TO THE NORTHWESTFROMA RADIAL BEARING OF soum0° 01' WEST HAVINGA RADIUS OF 20.00 FE;ET1HR.OUGHA CENTRAL ANGLE-OF 90° 00' ANMC . DISTANCE OF3"1A2 FEETTOA POINTONTHEWESTERN
LINE OF ESCOBAR . . 21) SOU'IH 890 59'EAST 60.00 FEETTO A POINTOF1HE EASTERNLINE OF ESCOBARAVENUE; lHENCE . . .' 22) SOUTHERLYALONG A NON-TANGENT CURVE·CONCAVE TO
THE NORTHEASTFROMA RADIAL BEARING OF NORTH89° 59" WEST HAVlNG A RADIUS OF 20.00 FEET1HROUGHA CENTRAL ANGLE OF 00' AN ARC . DISTANCE OF 3i.42 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE NORTHERN LINE
OF OLEANDERAVENUE 23) SOUTH 89° 59' BAST 75.00 FEET; THENCE
) ; --------_. ----.:.- 24)·ALONG A TANGENT CURVE CONCJ\VB TO THE SOUTHHAV1NG A RADIUS OF 245.00 FEEfTIIROUGHA CENTRAL ANGLE OF 15° 27' 23" ANARC . DISTANCE OF 66.09
FEETTO APOINT OF REVERSE CURVATURE; lHEN'CE 25}ALONG A TANGENT CURVE CONCAVETO THENORlHWESTHAVINGA RADWS OF20.00 FEET1HROUGHA CENTRAL ANGLE OF 80° 13' 23"; ANARC DISTANCE OF28.00 FEETTOA
POINT ONlHENORlHWESTERNLINEOF JASMINEWAY; TI:lENCE . . 26) ·64° 45' EAST 50.00 FEETTOA POINT ON TIIESOUIHEASTERN lINE OF JASMINE WAY· THENCE· ' t' , . _. 27) ALONG A NON;.'rANGENT
CURVE CONCAVB.TO TI:IE EAST FROM·A RADIAL ·sEAIuNG OF NORnI64°4S' WEST HAViNGA RADIUS OF 20.00 FEET 'iaRoUGHA CENTRALANGLE OF 80° AN ARC DISTANCE OF 28.00 :FEETTOA POINT
OF REVERSE CURVATIJRE; TImNCEALONG TIlE· NORlHEASTERNLINE OFOLEANDERAVEN'lJE . '. 28) ALONGA TANGENTCURVECqNCAVE l'O1HESOUTHWESTHAVINGA . RADIUS OF245.00 FEET1HROUGHA CENTRALANGLE.OF240
39' 09" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 105.42 FEET; 1HENCF; . 29) SOUIH 30° 19' 14" 70.32 FEET; 'IlIENCE LEAVlNG·1HE NORlHEASTERN LlNE OF OLEANDERAVENUE .. . 30) 40' 46" WEST
FEETTO 1HE.soutHwEsTERN iINE OF . OLEANDER AVENUE; lHENCE SOirrH'EASTERLY 31) AiONG A NON-TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE TO TIlENORlHWESTFROMA JW)IAL.BEARJNGOF40' 46ft
·EAsT HAVINGA RADIUS OF20.00· FEETlHROUGHA cE:N1RAL ANGLEOFW 29' 53" ANARC·DISTANcE OF. . FEETTO ANIRON soUTHERN BOUNDARYOFLOT388 OF ·.SAm TRACTON1HENORTHERNLINE
01"LRAC AVEN'lJE; 1HENCE LEAVINGLASTSAID SOU1HERNBOUNDARY. . 32) SOUIH3° 06' 46"EAST 62;48 FEETTO'IHENORlHERNCOMMONCORNER OF LOTS 424AND 425 OF SAID lRACT;11mNa·ALONG lHE·COMMON· . BOUNDARY
OF SAID LOTS 424AND 425 . .. . . 33) SOUlH 1'P 59' EAST 124.62 FEETto TIm POINTOF·BEGINNING. . 8.71 ACRES (379,357 SQUARE FEEl)MORE ORLESS . Revised SepL 17, 2003
i, \, \\" \\I '\\: \\\i \I . \\i \i!Iij ONE OF ONE I --,---., LINE TABLE EXHIIIT B L1 u 102.4;1' U 3.Co' . L4 NIDW'U",
Zm' us NOO'lll'QQ"E 38.21' UI H31'31'30'E '15.21' , .L7 HOlI'll1'OO"E 25.00' La' HOI'22'04'E 80.02' LV SS'4O'46"W 80.00" S1\uQt.. rn ' lOS GATQ$ Counly 01 SClnto a..." .5101. 01 CoIIIIlmk>
tIPIl 'I'"" 523-13-034 'E§\'! LOBlI l>! , , ',' CURVE TABLE ULAC AWNUS(80') --, C1 20,00' UO' '3\.4t C2 20,00' 80'3'23' 2/l.00' C3 20,00'
Mon' LEGEND SHADED AREA INDICATE5 PARCELS CURRENlLY W1lH1N EXlSllNG CllY Ul.tllS INOIC"1ES BOUNO,ARV Of ---,PROPOSED ANNEl<AllON PROPOSED' AREA Of ANNEXAllON 8:71 ACRES ;I; DUNBAR
and CRAIG UCENSED LAND SURVEYORS 23tl N. SANTA CRUZ AVf. SlJITE filii GAlOS, CA 95OJO 90-.01129 All distancos shown oro in ,feot and ducimols thereof,
'fOIIItI OF LOS,GAlUS, 'EN1l1l..ED iIl<lS96M ffiU: f11 I,iI\i \! '\ ' \\I I aml,ll1.pO' 0/. Ii AVENUE
(80') \ -----II !i """ tIPIl tIPIl tIPIl tIPIl , tIPIl tIPIl I 52J--13-00J U3-13-OM 523-13-055 U3-13-05I 623-13-067 623-13-051 123-13-0ll0 I LOT '37V LOT 3110 LOT :la1
LOT 3lI2 LOT ;JB:J LOT:lM. lqTJOa LOT_ ii IoP.M tIPIl tIPIl III'H 1IPIl 1IPIl /\PH ' AP.lI 62J-13-1I42 U3-13-1I41 U3-13-040 1123-13-lI3a I23-I3-ll3lI U3-13-0:17 6Z3-13-ll3lI 1123-13-0:15
LOT 3V7 LOT 3VI LOT ;sM LOT HZ LIlT ».t ,LOT 3VO , Ii ojI \')
RESOLUTION RESOLUTION OF THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF LOS GATOS MAKING FINDINGS ON THE VALUE OF WRITTEN PROTESTS FILED ANDNOT WITHDRAWN IN CERTAIN INHABITED TERRITORY DESIGNATED AS
BLOSSOM HILL MANOR NO. 11 .TO THE TOWN OF LOS GATOS WHEREAS, a petition for the annexation ofcertain territory to the Town ofLos Gatos and detachment ofsaid territory from Santa Clara
CoUnty Library Service Area No.1, consisting of8.71 acres on the southerly side ofOlecmder Avenue and the northerly side ofLilac Lane eAPN'S: 13-Q13 to 043, 523-13-053 to 063,
523-13-065, 523-26-032 to 037) has been filed by Carol Gruetzner; and WHEREAS, onDecemher 15,2003, the ToWn Council adopted Resolution No. 2003-142 initiating proceedings for annexation
ofthe area desigriated as Blossom Hill Manor No. 11; and WHEREAS, Section 56757 ofthe California Government Code states that the LocafAgency Formation Commission shall not review an
annexation proposal to any City in Santa Clara County ofunincorporated territory whiCh is within the urban service area ofthe city ifinitiated byresolution ofthe legislative body and
there the Town Council ofthe ToWn ofLos Gatos is nowthe conduction authority for said annexC!.tion; and . WHEREAS:, the Town ofLos Gatos notified affected property owners byposting,
publishing and mailing hearing notices pursuant to Sections 57025 and 57026 of the Government Code; received protests pursuant to Section 57051 ofthe Government Code, held a hearing
on February 17,2004, pursuant to Section 57050 ofthe Government Code, closed the hearing on February 17, 2004, and set March 15, 2004 as the date determine the value of written protests
filed and not withdrawn and take an action as described in Section 57075 ofthe Government Code ofthe State ofCalifornia; RESOLVED by the Town Council ofthe Town ofLos Gatos that the
following findings are true and correct: 1. The project is categorically exempt from C.E.Q.A. Class No. 15319(a). 2. The territory is "Inhabited" asdefmed in Section 56046 ofthe Government
Code ofthe State . of California. 3. The territory is contiguous to existing Town Limits. 4. The territory is within the Town's urban service area as adopted by the Local Agency Formation
COIIllpission of Santa Clara County. " 5. The proposal does not split line of assessment or ownership. 6. The proposed annexation does not create islands or areas in which it would be
difficult to provide municipal services. 7. The proposal in consistent With the Town's adopted general plan. C:\Documents and SettingslpjacobslLocal SettingsITEMP\Reso-Conclusion Post
Card .wpd ATTACHMENT 2
8. The reason for the proposed annexation is to properly plan provide municipal service to the area which is contiguous to the Town. 9. Thatthe County Surveyorhas determined that"U1e
boundaries ofthe proposed annexation are definite and certain. 10. The protest filed and hot withdiawri by property owners is more than 25 percent of the number ofowners ofland Who also
own at least 25 percent ofthe assessed value ofllie land within the affected territory; and , ' RESOLVED, by the Town Council ofthe ToWl). ofLos Gatos, a municipalcOJ;porationof the
County ofSanta Clara, State ofCalifornia, that pUrsuant to the provisions ofSections 57075 and 57115 ofthe Government Code ofthe State ofCalifornia, the annexation to the Town ofLos
Gatos ofthat territory designated as BlossomHill ManorNo.'11, 'and described in real property and map attached hereto, rn£irked Exhibits "A"and "B", respectively,
is approved, subje9t to a conformatio]J. ofthe voters by ballot election to be conducted on August 31, 2004, the past Tuesday in August. Election proceeding shall be conducted
by the Santa Clara County Registrar of Voters.FINALLY RESOLVED, that upon confirmation of these annexation proceedings by an election, the territory annexed will be taxed on the regular
county assessm'ent roll in Town ofLos Gatos Tax Rate A, excluding taxes for existing bonded indebtedness. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a special meeting of the Town Council held on March 18,
, 2004 by the following vote: COUNCIL MEMBERS: AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: SIGNED: MAYOR OF THE TOWNOF LOS GATOS LOS GATOS, CALIFORNIA ATTEST: CLERK OF THE TOWN OF LOS GATOS LOS GATOS,
CALIFORNIA C:IDocuments and Settings\pjacobslLocal SettingslTEMPIReso-Conclusion Post Card ,wpd 2
, : ...-----. EXHIBITA. ANNEXATION TO THE TOWNOF LOS GATOS ENTITLED BLOSSOM HILL MANOR NO. 11 -_.__..---.. j . . ALL OF THE REAL PROPERlY SITUATE IN SANTA CLARA COUNTY,
CALIFORNIA BEING MORE PARTICULARLYBOUNDED AND DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: . BEGINNING ATTIiE SOlITHEASTERN CORNEROF.LOT 424 AS SHOWN ON mAT. CERTAIN MAPENTI1LED "TRACTNO. BLOSSOMmLLMANOR;.UNlTNO.4"
AS FIL1ID IN BOOK 38 OF ATPAGEs 5, 6.AND 7, SANTA CLARA COUNTY. RECORDS. SAID CORNERALSO BEING ONTHEBOUNDARYLINE OF TIlE . ANNEXATION TO THETOWN OFLOS GATOS ENTrILED "BLOSSOM
HILLROAD NO. S".· ·THENCEPROCBEDINGALONG SAIDBOUNDARYLINEAND TImSOU'IHERN . . .BOUNDARY OF SAID1RACTNO.862 1) SOmHago 56' 15"WEST 548.18 FEEl'TOANIRON PIPE IN1HE CENTERLINE OF'DAHLIAWAY;
THENCE . 2) NORm89° 59'WEsT 351.24 FEETTO TIm SOU1lffiRNCOMMON CORNER OF LOTS 414AND 415 OFSAlD TRACT; 'IHENCE LEAVINGlBE BOUNDARYLINE OF1HE ANNEXATIONT01HETOWN OF LOS GATOS ENTITLED
"BLOSSOM HILLROADNO.8" ANDALONG:1HEBOUNDARYLINE OF 'filS .ANNEXATION TO1HETOWN OFLOS OFLOS GATOS ENTl1'UID "BLOSSOMHILL . AND ALONG1HECOMMONBOUNDARYOF SAID LOTS
414AND 415AND THE ExTENSIONl'HEREoF. .. . . 3) NORlBOo 01' EAST FEETTO A POINTONnm'sounmRNBOUNDARY OF LOT398 OF SAID TRAer; TIfENCE ALONG THE LAST SAID SOU'IHERN BOUNDARY
. 4) NORm8go 59'WEST 32.09 FEETTO:TIm SOU'THEaNCOMMONCORNEROF . LOTS 398 AND 399 OF SAID TRACT; lHENCEALONG TIlECOMMON . BOUNDARYOF SAID LOTS 398·AND 399 . . 5) NORlHOo 01'EASf 102.46
FEETTOnmNORnmRN COMMONCORNER OF SAID LOTS 398 AND 399;nIENCE ALONG THE NORlHERN BOUNDARyOF SAIDLOT 399 6)' NORTH 89° 59'WEST 3.00 FEETTOANIRON PIPEAT TIm SOU'IHERN COMMONCORNEROF PARCEL
"A" AND PARCEL "Btl. AS SAID PARcELS ARE SHOWN uPoN mATCERTAlN MAP FILED IN BOOK484 OF MAPS. ATPAGE 49. SANTA CLARACOUNlYRECORDS; THENCE LEAVING TImBOUNDARY LINE OF niB ANNEXATIONTO
TIfE toWN OF LOS GATOSEN'ITtLED . "BLOSSOM HILL MANORNO. 3" AND ALONG1HE BOUNDARYLINE OF THE ANNEXATION TO THETOWNOFLOS GATOS ENTlTLED"BLOSSOMHILL MANORNO.4" ANDALONG THE COMMONBOUNDARyOF
SAIDPARCEL ItA" AND PARCEL "B" 1) NORm19° 09' 25" WEST 24.35 FEETTOA CIDSELED "X" INA CONCRETE WALl{; THENCE . 8) NORTH 0° 01' EAST 38.25 FEETTO A cmSELED "X" INA CONCREfE WALK; THENCE
. 9) NORTH 31° 37' 30" EAST 15.26FEETTO AN IRON PIPE; TIIENCE
10) NORTH 0° 01= EAST 26.00 .tiEETTO AN IRONPWE AT lHE NORTHERN COMMON CORNEROF SAID PARCEL "A" AND ''B" ON THE SOUTHERN LINE OF OLEANDER-A'vENuE; rnENCE LEAVING THE BOUNDARYLlNEOFTIlEAN
NEXATIONTOTIlETOWN.OFLOSGAT08 ENTITLED "BLOSSOMHILL MANOR NO.4" AND ALONGTHE BOUNDARY LINE OF THE ANNEXATION TO THE TOWNOFW8 GATOS ENTITLEt> "BLOSSOM HILL MANORNO. 10"' 11) NORTIlI°.22'
04" WEST 60.02 FEETTOnmNORnlERNliNE OF OLEANDER AVENUE; TI:lENCE LEAVlNG 'IHE BOUNDARYLINE OFWEANNExATION' TOnmTOWNOFLOS GATOS ENTfI1B> "BLOSSOM HILL MANORNO. 10" 12) EASTERLYALONG A
NON-TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE TO TIm NORTHWEsTFROMA RADIAL BEARING OF SOU1H0° 01' WEST HAVING A RADWS OF20.00 FEEfTHROUGHA CENTRALANGU OF goo ()(Y ANARC DISTANCE OF 31.42 FEETTOA POINTONTHEWESTERNLINE
OFAZALEA' WAY; THENCE· . 13) SOUIH 89° 59' EAST 60.00 FEEtTO A POINT ONTIlE EASTERNLINE OF AZALEA WAY; lHENCE .'... ]4) SOUTHERLYALONGANON-TANGENT CURVECONCAVE TO TIm NOR1HEASTFROMA
RADIAL BEARINGOF NOR1H89° VING A RADIUS OF 20.00 FEET FEET THROtJGHA CENTRALANGLE OF 90° 00' .ANARc DISTANCE OF31.42 FEET; 1HENCEALONGTIlENORnfERN LiNE OF ' OLEANDER.AVENUE'
. 15) soOTH89° 59' 'BAST 164.00 FEEt; THENCE 16) EASTERLYALONGA NON-TANGENT'CuRVECONCAVB TOmE . NOR1HWESTFROMA RADIAL BEARING OF800m0° 01'WEST HAVING A RADIUS OF 20.00 FEET THROUGHA
CENTRALANGLE OF 90° 00' ANARC DISTANCE OF31.42 FEEl' TOA POINTOFnmWESTERNLINEOF JACARANDA WAY; THENCE , ' , 17) SOUTH S9' EAST 60.00 FEETTOAPOINT OF THE EASTERNLJNE OF JACARANDA
WAy; lHENCE '. 18)SOUTHERLYALONGA NON-TANGENT·CURVE CONCAVB TO nIB NORTHEASTFROMA RADIAL BEARING OFNORm89° HAVING A RADIUS OF 20.00 FEET THROUGHA CENTRAL ANGLE OF 90°
00' AN ARC . DISTANCE OF3].42 FEET; TIiENCEALONG nIBNORTIIERN LINE OF OLEANDERAVENUE , 19)·SOU1H 89° 59' EAST 170.00 FEET; 1HENCE 20) EASTERLYALONGA NON-TANGENT CURVE CONCAVETO THE NORTaWESTFROMAlUDI
AL BEARING OF SOUTH 0° 01' WEST HAVINGA RADWS OF 20.001HROUGHA CENTRAL ANGLE OF 90° 00' AN ARC DISTANCE OF3L42 FEEl'TO A POINTONTHEWESl'ERN'LINE OF ESCOBAR AVENUE;THENCE' ' , 21) SOUIH
89° 59'EAST 60.00 FEETTO A POINf OF THE EASTERNLlNE OF ESCOBARAVENUE; THENC.E . .' 22) SOUTHERLYALONG A NON-TANGENT CURVE·CONCAVB TO TIlE NORTHEASTFROMA RADIAL BEARJNG OF NORTH 89° 59"
WEST HAVlNG A RADIUS OF 20.00 FEET THROUGHA CENTRAL ANGLE OF 9Ol:! 00' AN ARC DISTANeE OF31.42 FEEI'; THENCE ALONG THE NORTHERN LINE OF OLEANDERAVENUE 23) SOU1H 89° 59' EAST 75.00 FEET;
TIIENCE
·__._-_----_._-----------------24) ALONG A TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE TO TIlEsOUmHAVlNG A RADIUS OF 245.00 FEET1HROUGHA CENTRAL ANGLE OF 15° 27' 23" ANARC DISTANCE OF 66.09 FEET TO A POINT
OF REVERSE CURVATURE; TIIENCE 25) ALONG A TANGENT CURVE CONCAVETO lHENORTIiWESTHAVlNG A RADIUS OF 20.00 FEET1HR.OUGHA CENTRAL ANGLE OF BOO 13' 23" ANARC DISTANCE OF28.00 FEET TOA POINT
ON1HENORlHWESTERN LINEOF JASMINE WAY; TIIENCE 26) 45' EAST 50.00 FEETTO A POINTONTIlE SOumEASTERN tINE QF JASMINE WAY; THENCE 27) ALONG A NON-TANGENT CURVE CONCAVETO
TIlE EASTFROM-A RADIAL QEA1uNG OF NORTH 64° 45'WESTHAviNG ARADIDS OF 20.00 FEET TIlROUGHA CENTRAL ANGLE OF 80° 13' 23" ANARC DISTANCE OF 28.00 FEETTOA POINT OF REVERSE CURVATURE; lHENCEALONG
TIm--NORTIfEASTBRNLlNE OFOLEANDERAVENUE -. 28) ALoN6A TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE TOmESOU1HWESTHAVINGA RADIUS OF 245.00 FEETlHROUGHA CENTRALANGLE OF 24° 39' 09" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 105.42 FEET;
lHENCE _ 29) SOUlll30° 19' 14"EAsT 70.32 FEET; TIlENCELEAVlNGnIE NOR'tHEASTERN -LlNE OF OLEANDER AVENUE ---30) SOU1H 59° 40' 46" WEST 60.()() FEETTO lHESOumwESTERNLINE OF OLEANDERAVENUE;
1HENCESOirrHEAsTERLY 31) ALONG A NON-TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE TO lHE NORlHWESTFROMA 1W>IAL BEARING OFNORm590 40' 46" EAsT HAVINGARADIUS OF 20.00FEETlHROUGHA CENlRALANGLE OF 99° 29' 53"·
AN ARCDISTANCE OF FEETTO ANIRONPIPE ON1HEsOt1THERNBOUNDARYOFLOT 388 OF .oS:Am TRACTON1HENORTHaRNLINE OFLILAC AvENuE; lHENCE LEAVING LAST SAID SOU1HERNBOUNDARY ° 32) SOU1H3°
06' 46" EAST F'EETTO nIBNOR'IHERNCOMMON CORNER OF LOTS 424AND 425 OF SAID lRACT;THENCEoALONG lHECOMMON ° BOUNDARY OF SAID LOTS 424 AND 425 ° -0 • 33.) SOUlH 17° 59' EAST i24.62
FEETto 1HEPOINT Of BEGINNING. CONTAINING 8.71 ACRES (379.357 SQUARE FEEl)MORE OR LESS Revised Sept. 17.2003
, \\ I R. 24e.OO' A. 24"0lI" L.,011.41. LOCA1IQN MAP /ll.0SSQij Hiu. if LINE TABLE L1 ,.uDa' Ll NOO'Ofcio"E· U
3.00" L4 1l1a'08'U"W 14:;55' L.5 NOO'lJ1'oo"E: .au' I.e N31'31'30"E 111.211' . Ll llOll'D\'ooi: . a.oo' UI 1lD1'22'04'E eo.02' LlI $5i'4O'-46"W 10.00' CURVE TABLE C1 20.00' DO' ·31.+2'
C2 20,00' 28.00' CJ 20.00' '"'2a'53" 3+.73' SHADED AREA INDICA1[S PARCELS CURR£NllY \\IlHlN ElllSllNG C1lY U...llS
INDICA1[S BOUND,\RY OF ---PROPOSED ANNEXAllON I IIQPOE) AlNlCf\1lOlt TO SlIuGl.·1n . SCAI.£: 1 ItICll .; 100 fE£ llRI,lIN:.i'K ,lQ8 NO. oJ2U lHD \ lOYIN OF LOS GAlOS . LOS OAlOS
. DAm 11, 200! R.IC . .HlE)(: SANTA' <URI. ONE . l:HllTLED 'illQSSOlll tlIu: 1'ANOR fll Counly of Sonlo 1:1.......5101. of CalI"""10 .f1WIwcl!tK: N:.NJ NO.
032H.dwv f)I£ .NO. OF ONE iiJ PROPosE!, AREA OF ANNEXAnON 6.71 ACRES ;j: DUNBAR and CRAIG UCENSED LAND SURVEYORS 23(1 N. SANTA CRUZ AVE. SUIl!:: 1104 GATO$, CA 1I5OJO 99-,01129 All
distances shown 0'0 in wet ond decimals thereof. \,.' i\IiI I\\ \I \\\1\\ fT1 "->< ::r -.J, CT -'. ,rr OJ j f" I)