09 Staff Report - Blossom Hill Manor No. 11
DATE: COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT March 10, 2004 MEETINGDATE: 3/15/04 ITEM NO. q TO: FROM: SUBJECT: DEBRA J. FIGONE, TOWN MANAGER ADOPTARESOLUTIONMAKINGFINDINGS
CONCERNINGTHE VALUE OF WRITTEN PROTESTS AND NOT WITHDRAWN AND ORDERING THE REORGANIZATION OF THE TERRITORY KNOWN AS BLOSSOM MANOR NO. 11, AND SET FOR AN ELECTION, CONCURRENT
WITH THE NOVEMBER 2004 GENERAL ELECTION. RECOMMENDATION: Adppt a resolution making findings concerning the value ofwritten protests filed and not withdrawn an4 ordering the reorganization
ofthe territory known as Blossom Hill Manor No. 11, and set for an -election, concurrent with the November 2004 General Election. BACKGROUND: The annexation of County territory into
the Town can be initiated either by the Town or by the property owners filing an annexation petition with the Town. At the beginning of2003, Carol Gruetzner, a resident ofBlossom Hill
Manor area approached the Town about annexing her property to the Town. Since the Gruetzner property is more than 300 feet from the Town limits, owners of additional property would need
to be included in and agree to annexation in order for the Gruetzner property to be annexed. Three hundred feet is the maximum distance along a public street that a property can be from
the Town limits, in order to be annexed. Since that time, Mrs. Gruetzner has worked diligently to obtain signatures ofmany ofher neighbors on the petition for annexation.. Mrs. Gruetzner
met with Town staff and a boundary for the annexation was determined. During the review by the Santa Clara CountyLocal Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO), the Oleander Avenue right-of-way
was required to be included in the annexation territory, in order to meet the County road annexation policies. PREPARED BY: ORNE. CURTIS irector ofParks and Public Works Reviewed
by: 'S Assistant Town Manager ---t'Jof'=..' __Community Development 52 ,Finance 10:04 am .J Refonnatted: 5/30/02 N:\B&E\COUNCIL REPORTS\Annex-Blossom Hill Manor II-Conclusion.wpd
PAGE 2 . SUBJECT: BLOSSOM HILL MANOR NO. 11 ANNEXATION March 10,2004 The annexation territory is within the Town's Urban Services Area boundary,
and is pre-zoned Rl:8 (single family residential, 8,000 sq. ft. minimum lot size). Reorganization would help in fill an existing County "island." On December 15, 2003, the Town Council
set January 20, 2004 as the date to hear protests regarding the annexation. Due to an error by the newspaper publishing the public hearing notice, the date was extended to February 17,2004.
From the time the notice was published in the local newspaper until the close ofthe public hearing on February 17,2004, property owners and registered voters residing in the annexation
area had the opportunity to protest the annexation. As part notification for the public hearing, instructions for protesting the annexation were provided. DISCUSSION: On February 17,2004,
a hearing was held, giving affected registered voters and property owners an opportunity to be heard by the Council and file written protests to the annexation. The Council set March
15, 2004 as the date to make findings ofthe value ofwritten protests filed and not withdrawn and to take one of the following actions, as prescribed by California Government Code Section
57075: 1. Terminate the proceeding ifa majority voter protest (50% or more) exists in accordance with Section 57078 of the Government Code. 2. Order the change oforganization subject
to a confirmation by the registered voters residing within the affected territory if written protests have been filed and not either of the following: a) At least
2.5 percent, but less than 50 percent, of the registered voters residing in the affected territory. b) At least 25 percent ofthe number ofowners ofland who also own at least 25 percent
ofthe assessed value of land within the affected territory. 3. Order the change of organization without an election if written protests have been filed and not withdrawn by less than
25 percent ofthe registered voters and less than 25 percent ofthe number of owners ofland owning less than 25 percent of the assessed value of land within the affected territory. Blossom
Hill Manor No. 11 contains 63 registered voters. Sixteen written protests were filed, of which 13 were determined to be valid, representing 20.63 percent ofthe registered voters within
the territory. This territory also contains 52 property owners, with a total assessed value ofthe land of $7,333,447.00. Fourteen written protests were filed, of which all were determined
to be valid, representing 27.45 percent ofthe property owners. The total value ofland ofthose property owners N:IB&EICOUNCIL REPORTSlAnnex-Blossom Hill Manor ll-Conclusion.wpd
PAGE 3 MAYOR AND TOWN COUNCIL SUBJECT: BLOSSOM HILL MANOR NO. 11 ANNEXATION March 11, 2004 filing written protests is $2,259,549.00, which is 30.18 percent ofthe total value ofland within
the territory. Based on these results, the California Government Code Section 57075 requires the Town to order the change of organization subject 'to a confirmation by the registered
voters residing within the affected territory. This is the Town's only role in this stage ofthe annexation process. Confirmation by registered voters can be accomplished through a general
election or by a postcard election. It is recommended that the annexation election be consolidated with the November 2004 General Election, rather than being conducted via a postcard
election. Both procedures require the same election material and costs. As with all election activities in Santa Clara County, the annexation election would be handled by the Santa Clara
County Registrar of Voters, requiring less stafftime to coordinate than would a postcard election. During the late Spring or early Summer, the Town Clerk with introduce a resolution
calling for election in the Town and setting deadlines for meeting the election requirements. Registered voters in the affected area will be the only ones eligible to vote inthe election,
and they will be notified of the upcoming annexation election. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENTS: Reorganization of the subject property is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act
Guidelines, pursuant to Section 15319(a). FISCAL IMPACT: For annexations that are more than five (5) lots, the Town charges no fee for the annexation proceedings. The following fees
are assessed by Santa Clara County, LAFCO and the State Board of Equalization, and will paid by the annexation petitioners: Map, Legal Description and Guideline Checking Fees $2,000.00
(paid) LAFCO Processing Fee . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 340.00 State Board of Equalization Fee , 500.00 TOTAL FEES ; $2,840.00 The cost of an election in the Blossom Hill Manor
No. 11 Annexation area, whether consolidated with the November 2004 General Election or not, is approximately $10,000. Funds for this election will be incorporated into the FY 2004/05
recommended Town Clerk budget. If the reorganization is approved, once it is certified by the State Board of Equalization, the Town . will receive approximately nine point six percent
(9.6%) of the property taxes. N:\B&E\COUNCIL REPORTSlAnnex-Blossom Hill Manor Il-Conclusion.wpd
PAGE 4 . SUBJECT: BLOSSOM HILL MANOR NO. 11 ANNEXAnON March 10, 2004 Attachments: Resolution making findings on the value of written protests files
and not withdrawn in. certain inhabited territory designated as "Blossom Hill Manor No. 11,"(with Exhibit A and B). A. Description ofBlossom Hill Manor No. 11 Annexation B. Map to accompany
description Distribution: Neelima Palacherla, Executive Officer, Santa Clara County Local Agericy Formation Commission, County Government Center, East Wing, 70 W. Hedding Street, 11
th Floor, San Jose, CA 95110 Tim Chow, Director, Environmental Resources Agency, County Government Center, East Wing, 70 W. Hedding Street, 7th Floor, sari Jose, CA 95110 Gay Strand,
Manager for Administrative Services, County Library Service Area, 1095 North First Street, San Jose, CA 95112 Carol Gruetzner, 16192 Oleander Ave., Los Gatos, CA 95032 Larry Gerston,
16194 Lilac Lane, Los Gatos, CA 95032 Eleanor Gallmeister, 16210 Lilac Lane, Los Gatos, CA 95032 N:\N:\B&E\COUNCIL REPORTSlAnnex-Blossom Hill Manor II-Condusion.wpd
RESOLUTION RESOLUTION OF THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF LOS GATOS MAKING FINDJNGS ON THE VALUE OF WRITTEN PROTESTS FILED AND NOT WITHDRAWN IN CERTAJN JNHABITED TERRITORY DESIGNATED
AS BLOSSOM HILL MANOR NO. 11 TO THE TOWN OF LOS GATOS WHEREAS, a petition for the annexation ofcertain territory to the Town ofLos Gatos and detachment ofsaidterritory from Santa Clara
CountyLibrary Service Area No.1, consisting of8.71 acres on the southerly side ofOleander Avenue and the northerly side ofLilac Lane (APN'S: 52313-01.3 to 043, 523-13-053 to 063, 523-13-065,
523-26-032 to 037) has been filed by Carol Gruetzner, et al; and WHEREAS, on December 15,2004, the Town Council adopted Resolution No. 2003-142 initiating proceedings for annexation
ofthe area designated as Blossom Hill Manor No. 11; and. ; WHEREAS, said territory is inhabited and all owners of land have not consented to this redrganization; and WHEREAS, Section
56757 ofthe California Government Code states that the Local Agency Formation Commission shall not review an annexation proposal to any City in Santa Clara County ofunincorporated territorywhich
is within the urban service area ofthe cityifinitiated byresolution ofthe legislative body and there the TownCouncil ofthe Town ofLas Gatos is now the conduction " authority for said
annexation; and WHEREAS, in accordance with Government Code Section 57025 (a and b) and Section 57026, the Town Clerk ofthe Town ofLos Gatos has provided mailed notice ofthe hearing
on the reorganization and notification of their eligibility to protest this city-initiated proceeding with instructions on how to prepare a valid, written protest; and WHEREAS, the Town
ofLos Gatos has conducted a public hearing on the reorganization in accordance with Section 57050 ofthe California Government Code, to accept protests, objections or evidence which is
made, presented, or filed; and WHEREAS, the Town ofLos Gatos, at the close to the public hearing, intends to determine the value of the written protests in order to make the appropriate
action action on the reorganization. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Town Council "ofthe ToWn ofLos Gatos as follows: N:IB&EICOUNCIL REPORTSlAnnex-Blossom Hill Manor ll-Conclusion.wpd
1. That it is the conduction authority pursuant to Section 56757 ofthe Government Code for the annexation ofproperty designated "Blossom Hill Manor No. 11" more particularly described
in Exhibits "A" and "B"; 2. That the following findings are made by the Town Council ofthe Town ofLos Gatos: a. That said territory is "Inhabited" and comprisys approximately 8.71 acres.
b. That the annexation is consistent with the orderly annexation of territory within the Town's urban service area and is consistent with the Town policy ofannexing when the reason for
the proposed annexation is to properly plan ana. provide municipal service to the area which is contiguous to the Town. c. The project is categorically exempt from C.E.Q.A. Class No.
15319(a). d. The Town Council enacted an ordinance pre-zoning the subject territory with an R1:8000 designation more than 25 years ago. e. The territory is within the Town's urban service
area as adopted by the Local Agency Formation Commission of Santa Clara County. £ That the County Surveyor has determined that the boundaries ofthe proposed annexation are definite and
certain, and in compliance with the Commissiop.'s road annexation policies. The County Surveyor has been reiinbursed for the actual cost incurred in making this determination. g. The
proposed annexation does not create islands or areas in which it would be difficult to provide municipal services. h. The proposal does not split line ofassessment or ownership. I. The
proposal in consistent with the Town's adopted general plan. J. The territory is contiguous to existing Town Limits. k. That the Town has complied with all conditions imposed by the
commission. for inclusion ofthe territory in the Town's urban service area. 3. That 13 valid written protests to the reorganization proceeding were receiveci by the Clerk of the Town
ofLos Gatos and the value ofthose protests submitted prior to the close ofthe public hearing constitute 20.63% ofthe 63 registered voters within the affected territory. 4. That 14 valid
written protests to the reorganization proceeding were received by the Clerk of the Town ofLos Gatos and the value ofthose protest submitted prior to the close ofthe public hearing constitute
27.45 % ofthe 52 property owners owning 30.18% ofthe $7,333,447 total assessed value ofthe land within the territory. N:IB&E\COUNCIL REPORTSlAnnex-Blossom Hill Manor II-Conclusion.wpd
5. That said annexation is hereby ordered, subject to a conformation of the registered voters residing within the subject territory, pursuant to Sections 57075 and 57115 ofthe Government
Code of the State of California. Said election to be conducted currently with the November 2004 General Election. Election proceeding shall be conducted by the Santa Clara County Registrar
ofVoters. BE IT FURTHERRESOLVED that upon conformation ofthese reorganization proceedings by an election, the territory annexed will be detached from the Santa Clara County Library Service
Area No. 01. FINALLY RESOLVED, that upon confirmation of these annexation proceedings by an election, the territory annexed will be taxed on county assessment roll
in Town of Los Gatos Tax Rate A, excluding taxes for existing bonded indebtedness. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Town Council held on 15th day of March, 2004 by the
following vote: COUNCIL MEMBERS: AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: SIGNED: MAYOR OF THE TOWN OF LOS GATOS LOS GATOS, CALIFORNIA ATTEST: CLERK OF THE TOWN OF LOS GATOS LOS GATOS, CALIFORNIA
N:\B&E\COUNClL REPORTSlAnnex-Blossom Hill Manor Il-Conclusion.wpd
-_..--, . --,-------, .. -----,,-------,------EXIDBITA ANNEXATION TO THE TOWN OF LOS GATOS ENTITLED BLOSSOM HILL MANOR NO. 11 ALL OF THE REAL PROPERlY SITUATE IN SANTA CLARA COUNlY,
CALIFORNIA BEING MORE PARTICULARLY BOUNDED AND DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT1HESOUTHEASTERN CORNEROF LOT 424 AS SHOWN ON mAT CERTAIN MAP ENTITLED "TRACT NO. 862, BLOSSOMHILL MANOR,
UNIT NO. 4" AS Fll.ED IN BOOK 38 OF MAPS, AT PAGES 5, 6 AND 7, SANTA CLARA COUNTY RECORDS, SAID CORNERALSO BEING ON THE BOUNDARY LINE OF TIlE ANNEXATION TO1HETOWN OF LOS GATOS ENTITLED
"BLOSSOM HILL ROAD NO. 8"; TIIENCE PROCEEDING ALONG SAID BOUNDARYLINE AND 1HE SOUTHERN BOUNDARY OF SAID TRACT NO.,862 1) SOUTII 8go 56' IS" WEST 548.18 FEET TO AN IRON PIPE IN TIlE CENTERLINE
OF DAHLIA WAY; THENCE 2) NORTIl89° 59'WEST 351.24 FEETTO THE SOumERN COMMON CORNER OF LOTS 414 AND 415 OF SAID TRACT; lHENCE LEAVING nIB BOUNDARY LINE OF THE ANNEXATION TOTHE TOWN OF
LOS GATOS ENTITLED "BLOSSOM HILL ROAD NO.8" AND ALONG THE BOUNDARY LINE OF TIlE ANNEXATION TO THETOWN OF LOS GATOS ENTITLED "BLOSSOM HILL MANORNO.3" AND ALONG 1HE COMMON BOUNDARY OF
SAID LOTS 414 AND 415 AND THE EXTENSION THEREOF 3) NORTII 0° 01' EAST 160.00 FEETTO A POINT ON TIIE SOUTIlERN BOUNDARY OF LOT 398 OF SAID TRACI'; TIIENCE ALONG TIlE LAST SAID SOUTHERN
BOUNDARY 4) NORlH 89° 59'WEST 32.09 FEET TO THE SOUTIIERN COMMON CORNER OF LOTS 398 AND 399 OF SAID lRACT; THENCE ALONG THE COMMON BOUNDARY OF SAID LOTS 398 AND 399 5) NORlH0° 01' EAST
102.46 FEET TO TIlE NORTIfERN COMMON CORNER OF SAID LOTS 398 AND 399; THENCE ALONG THENORTHERN BOUNDARY OF SAID LOT 399 6) NORlH 89° 59'WEST 3.00 FEETTO AN IRON PIPE AT THE SOUTIIERN
COMMON CORNER OF PARCEL "A" AND PARCEL "B", AS SAID PARCELS ARE SHOWN UPON mATCERTAIN MAP FILED IN BOOK 484 OF MAPS, AT PAGE 49, SANTA,CLARA COUNTYRECORDS; TIiENCE LEAVING THE BOUNDARY
LINE OF THE ANNEXATION TO1HETOWN OF LOS GATOS ENTITLED "BLOSSOM HILL MANOR NO.3" AND ALONG tHE BOUNDARY LINE OF TIlE ANNEXATIONTO THETOWN OF LOS GATOS ENTITLED "BLOSSOM HILL MANOR NO.4"
AND ALONG THE COMMON BOUNDARY OF SAID PARCEL "A" AND PARCEL "B" 7) NORTIlI9° 09' 25" WEST 24.35 FEET TO A CmSELED "X" IN A CONCRETE WALK; THENCE 8) NORlH 0° 01' EAST 38.25 FEETTO A CmSELED
"X" INA CONCRETE WALK; lHENCE 9) NORlH 31° 37' 30" EAST 15.26 FEET TO AN IRON PIPE; THENCE
10) NORlH 0° 01' EAST 26.00 FEEI'TO AN IRON PIPEAT TIlE NORTHERN COMMON CORNER OF SAID PARCEL "A" AND PARCEL ''B'' ON THE SOUIHERN LINE OF OLEANDERAVENUE; TIlENCE LEAVING THE BOUNDARY
LINE OF THE ANNEXATION TO THE TOWN OF LOS GATOS ENTITLED "BLOSSOM IDLL MANOR NO.4" AND ALONG THE BOUNDARY LINE OF THE ANNEXATION TO THE TOWN OFWS GATOS ENTITLED "BLOSSOM HILL MANOR NO.
10" 11) NORlH 1° 22' 04" WEST 60.02 FEET TO THE NORTHERN LINE OF OLEANDER AVENUE; lHENCELEAVING THE BOUNDARYLINE OF THE ANNEXATION TO THETOWN OF LOS GATOS ENTITLED "BLOSSOM HILL MANOR
NO. 10" ··12) EASTERLY ALONG A NON-TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE TO THE NORTIlWEST FROM A RADIAL BEARING OF soum0° 01' WEST. HAVING A RADIUS OF 20.00 FEEl' lHROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 90° 00'
AN ARC DISTANCE OF 31.42 FEET TOA POINT ON TIlEWESTERN LINE OF AZALEA WAY; TIlENCE .. 13)SOUlH 89° 59' EAST 60.00 FEEl'TO A POINT ON THE EASTERN LINE OF AZALEA WAY; THENCE 14) SOUTHERLYALONG
A NON-TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE TO THE NORTHEAST FROM A RADIAL BEARING OF NORTII 89° 59" WEST HAVING A RADIUS OF 20.00 FEEl' lHROUGHA CENTRAL ANGLE OF 90° 00' AN"ARC DISTANCE OF 31.42 FEET;
TIlENCE ALONG THENORlHERN LINE OF OLEANDER AVENUE " 15) SOUTH 89° 59' EAST 164.00 FEEI'; lHENCE . 16) EASTERLY ALONG A NON-TANGENTCURVE CONCAVB TOTHE NORlHWEST FROMA RADIAL BEARING OF
SOUlH 0° 01' WEST HAVING A RADIUS OF 20.00 FEET lHROUGHA CENTRAL ANGLE OF 90° 00' AN ARC DISTANCE OF 31.42 FEEl' TO A POINT OF THE WESTERN LINE OF JACARANDA WAY; THENCE 17)SOUlH 8go
59' EAST 60,00 FEETTOA POINT OF THE EASTERN LINE OF· JACARANDA WAY; lHENCE . 18) SOUlHERLY ALONGA NON-TANGENTCURVE CONCAVB TO THE NORTIffiAST FROM A RADIAL BEARING OF NORTIlSgo 59" WEST
HAVING A RADIUS OF 20.00 FEEl'1HR.OUGHA CENTRAL ANGLE OF 90° oo'ANARC DISTANCE OF 31.42 FEET; 1HENCEALONG THE NORlHERN LINE OF OLEANDERAVENUE . 19) SOUlH 89° 59' EAST 170.00 FEET; TIlENCE
20) EASTERLY ALONG A NON-TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE 'to THE NORTHWEST FROMA RADIAL BEARING OF SOUTH 0° 01' WEST HAVING A RADIUS OF 20.00 FEET lHROUGH A cENtRAL ANGLE OF 90° 00' ANARC DISTANCE
OF 31.42 FEEl' TOA POINT ON THE WESTERN LINE OF ESCOBAR AVENUE; nIENCE 21) SOUlH 89° 59' EAST 60.00 FEETTO A POINT OF THE EASTERN.LINE OF ESCOBAR AVENUE; THENCE 22) SOUlHERLYALONG A
NON·TANGENT CURVE CONCAVB TO THE NORTIlEAST FROM A RADIAL BEARING OF NORlH 89° 59" WEST HAVING A RADIUS OF 20.00 FEET TIlROUGHA CENTRAL ANGLE OF 90° OOi ANARC DISTANCE OF 31.42 FEET;
THENCE ALONG THE NOR1HERN LINE OF OLEANDER AVENUE 23) SOUTH 89° 59' EAST 75.00 FEET; THENCE
.,------_.._------------------------_._--_.__.._-24) ALONG A TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE TO TIm SOUTH HAVING A RADIUS OF 245.00 FEETlHROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 15° 27' 23" AN ARC DISTANCE OF
66.09 FEET TO A POINT OF REVERSE CURVATURE; THENCE 25) ALONG A TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE TO TIm NORTIlWEST HAVING A RADIUS OF 20.00 FEETlHROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 80° 13' 23" AN ARC DISTANCE
OF 28.00 FEET TO A POINT ON lHE NORTHWESTERN LINE OF JASMINE WAY; lHENCE 26) SOUTH 64° 45' EAST 50.00 FEET TO A POINT ON TIlE SOUTHEASTERN LINE OF JASMINE WAY; THENCE 27) ALONG A NON-TANGENT
CURVE CONCAVE TO TIlE EAST FROM A RADIAL BEARING OF NORTIl64° 45' WEST HAVING A RADIUS OF 20.00 FEET TIIROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 80° 13' 23" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 28.00 FEET TOA POINT OF
REVERSE CURVATURE; THENCE ALONG TIlE NORTHEASTERN LINE OF OLEANDER AVENUE 28) ALONG A TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE TO THE SOU1HWEST HAVING A RADIUS OF 245.00 FEET TIIROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF
24° 39' 09" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 105.42 FEET; THENCE 29) sourn 30° 19' 14" EAsT 70.32 FEET; THENCE LEAVING1HE NORlHEASTERN LINE OF OLEANDER AVENUE 30) SOUTH 59° 40' 46" WEST 60.00 FEETTO
THESOunIWESTERN LINE OF OLEANDER AVENUE; TIIENCE SOUTHEASTERLY 31) ALONG A NON-TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE TO 1HENORlHWESTFROM A RADIAL BEARING OF NORTH 40' 46" EAST HAVING A RADIUS OF
20.00 FEET TIIROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 99° .29' 53" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 34.73 FEETTO AN IRON PIPE ON lHE SOUlHERN BOUNDARY OF LOT 388 OF SAID TRACT ON THE NORTHERN LINE OF LILAC AVENUE;
THENCE LEAVING LAST SAID SOUlHERN BOUNDARY 32) SOUIH 3° 06' 46" EAST 62.48 FEETTO THE NORlHERN COMMON CORNER OF LOTS 424 AND 425 OF SAID TRACT; THENCE ALONG TIlE COMMON BOUNDARY OF SAID
LOTS 424 AND 425 33) SOUTH 17° 59' EAST 124.62 FEET TO 1HEPOINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING 8.71 ACRES (379,357 SQUARE FEEl) MORE OR LESS Revised Sept. 17, 2003
IONE Of' ONE R • 245.00' '" • 24"38'01" L. 1011.42' INDEX: SANTA a.ARA JOB NO. 03218' F1l£ NO. LOCAlION YAP BtOSSiij HILL Ie iAI'N 523--13-013 LOT 3lI8 I 1 -_.__• __PROP. ANNEXAnON
OATE: SEP1EIllIEll II, 20031 CHECK£D: RJC FlEUlWOftl(: I ACAO NO. 032ll8.<1w9 SCALE : I INCH • 100 F'£E1 ORAllll: ..... LINE TABLE EXHIITB LI NII8'5l1:oo'=W ._' L2 NOO'Ol'OO"E 102.41'
L3 NII8'S'OO"W 3.00' L4 Nl8'lM1'25"W 24.35' l.5 NOO'Ol'OO"E 31.25' La N31"3T3D"E 15.21' L7 NOO'Ol'OO"E 21.00' La NOl'22'04"E 10.02' L8 558'40'4I"W 10.00' S1luol.. 1n LOS GllTOS Counly
ofSonlo <:len. Slol. of Colltomlo 523-A-1I'N3-040 I li2J-A1I3'N-03ll I 523-A-1I'N3-031 I.523-A1I3'N-037 I li2J-A13l-0'N3I I 523-A-1I'N3-035 LDT 3115 LOT _ LOT J83 • LOT 312 LOT 301 LDT
_ AI'N 523-13-041 LOT 3llI SHADE[) AREA INDICA1£S PARCELS CURRENllY VII11HIN EXlSlING CITY UMllS INDICA1£S BOUNDARY OF PROPOSED ANNEXAliON CURVE TABLE AI'N LOT 317 ...
---------------------AI'N APN 523-13-032 523-2S-035 LOT 411 LOT 422 Cl 20.00' lIO" I 31.42'1 C2 20.00' llO"l3'23"1 2Il.OO'1 C3 20.00' lli'28'53", 34073" SllIS'E 10.00'
SllIS'E 10.00' S8n8'E 10.00' . .,.aCl r SIn8'E 114.00' 0/. i Me uvo: ClfJi[[:" L· :1 OWNDER AVENUE (80') a . ,..,... . .A!l ---.--------------.f
/..-= AI'N AI'N AI'N AI'N AI'N AI'N AI'N 523--13-053 52J-13-ll54 523--13-055 523--13-_ 523--13-057 523--13-058 " _LD_T_37l1_+-_LD_T_3811_+_LD_T_3II1_-\-_LD_T_382_-+-_LD_T_383_+-_LD_T_3
I4_+_LD_T_Jllll_-\- 862,. .1l-7 ..\ xV/.Y/PROPOSED' AREA OF ANNEXAliON 8.71 ACRES :i: DUNBAR and CRAIG UCENSED LAND SURVEYORS 2J8
N. SANTA CRUZ AVE, SUITE 1104 GAlOS, eA 95030 All distances shown are in feet and decimals thereof. PIllI'OEl MllEXA1IlIII 111 TO'IlN OF LOS 011lOS J ,':'un'=C7 ==:::2..
'ENnnm. -a00S0lll 11fU: 1IANOR fl1 CT1 >< :::> -.I, cr -.I, c+ co