Loading...
Staff Report with Exhibits 1-17. 15475 Los Gatos Boulevard PREPARED BY: ERIN WALTERS Associate Planner Reviewed by: Planning Manager and Community Development Director 110 E. Main Street Los Gatos, CA 95030 ● (408) 354-6872 www.losgatosca.gov TOWN OF LOS GATOS PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT MEETING DATE: 11/09/2022 ITEM NO: 4 DATE: November 4, 2022 TO: Planning Commission FROM: Joel Paulson, Community Development Director SUBJECT: Requesting Approval of a Variance to Allow a Drive-Thru Use at an Existing Restaurant (McDonald’s) and Modification to a Conditional Use Permit for a Drive-Thru Restaurant on Property Zoned CH. Located at 15475 Los Gatos Boulevard. APN 424-19-065. Variance Application V-21-001 and Conditional Use Permit Application U-21-005. PROPERTY OWNER: Franchise Realty Interstate Corporation. APPLICANT: Mike Yao, Core States Group. PROJECT PLANNER: Erin Walters. RECOMMENDATION: Denial. PROJECT DATA: General Plan Designation: Mixed Use Commercial Zoning Designation: Restricted Commercial Highway - CH Applicable Plans & Standards: General Plan, Zoning Code Parcel Size: 1.3 acres Surrounding Area: Existing Land Use General Plan Zoning North Medical Office and Office Mixed Use Commercial CH South Commercial Mixed Use Commercial CH East Commercial Mixed Use Commercial CH West Commercial Mixed Use Commercial CH PAGE 2 OF 12 SUBJECT: 15475 Los Gatos Boulevard/V-21-001 and U-21-005 DATE: November 4, 2022 S:\PLANNING COMMISSION REPORTS\2022\11-09-2022\Item 4 - 15475 Los Gatos Boulevard\Staff Report. 15475 Los Gatos Boulevard.docx CEQA: The project is Categorically Exempt pursuant to the adopted Guidelines for the Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act, Section 15301: Existing Facilities. FINDINGS: ▪ The project is Categorically Exempt pursuant to the adopted Guidel ines for the Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act, Section 15301: Existing Facilities. ▪ As required by Section 29.20.170 of the Town Code for granting a Variance application. ▪ As required by Section 29.20.190 of the Town Code for granting a Conditional Use Permit. ACTION: The decision of the Planning Commission is final unless appealed within ten days. BACKGROUND: The subject property is located on the west side of Los Gatos Boulevard, south of Gateway Drive, and north of Los Gatos-Almaden Road (Exhibit 1). On August 1, 1977, the Town Council adopted Ordinance 1363, adding a section to the Town Code prohibiting specific uses in all zones, including drive-in restaurant uses, which is defined as, “a restaurant where food or beverages are sold to be eaten in vehicles whether on or off the premises or are delivered directly to the occupants of vehicles.” On December 15, 1976, the Town Architecture and Site Committee approved Conditional Use Permit (CUP) applications U-76-18 and U-76-18A to allow a restaurant use (McDonald’s) with the sale of packaged foods and non-alcoholic beverages for consumption on- and off-site (Exhibit 5). On June 2, 1983, the Planning Commission approved CUP application U-83-14 to allow the operation of an existing restaurant with take-out food service, drive-thru window, and approval for exterior rehabilitation of an existing Jack-in-the-Box restaurant located at 15771 Los Gatos Boulevard (Exhibit 6). This is currently the Town’s only drive-thru restaurant. On December 12, 1984, the Planning Commission denied CUP application U-76-18B requesting approval of plans to modify the use of an existing restaurant (McDonald’s) to include drive-thru food service and to make exterior modifications to the building to accommodate this change of use. Public testimony expressed concerns regarding potential air pollution from idling cars, PAGE 3 OF 12 SUBJECT: 15475 Los Gatos Boulevard/V-21-001 and U-21-005 DATE: November 4, 2022 S:\PLANNING COMMISSION REPORTS\2022\11-09-2022\Item 4 - 15475 Los Gatos Boulevard\Staff Report. 15475 Los Gatos Boulevard.docx BACKGROUND (continued): traffic congestion, and noise pollution. A member of the public expressed support of the proposed drive-thru to increase accessibility for people with disabilities. On December 9, 2020, the Conceptual Development Advisory Committee (CDAC) considered a request by the subject applicant for preliminary review of a proposal for a Variance to allow a drive-in (thru) use at the existing fast-food restaurant (McDonald’s) on the subject site (Exhibit 7). A summary of the CDAC meeting and the applicant’s response to comments are provided in a later section of this report. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: A. Location and Surrounding Neighborhood The subject property is located on the west side of Los Gatos Boulevard, south of Gateway Drive, and north of Los Gatos-Almaden Road (Exhibit 1). The 1.3-acre site is currently developed with an existing one-story fast-food restaurant (McDonald’s), which has been in operation since 1976. The property abuts commercial properties to the north, west, south , and across Los Gatos Boulevard to the east. B. Project Summary The applicant is requesting approval of a Variance application to allow a prohibited use, a drive-thru restaurant, and requesting approval of a modification to a Conditional Use Permit for a drive-thru restaurant use. The project includes adding a single drive-thru lane to the existing restaurant’s parking lot, the addition of an order canopy with built in speaker box, and an outdoor digital menu board. In addition, the project includes minor window and door modifications to the existing building to accommodate the drive-thru, and restriping and minor reconfiguration of the existing parking lot. C. Zoning Compliance The proposed drive-thru restaurant use is a prohibited use in all zones pursuant to Town Code Section 29.10.045 (b). DISCUSSION: A. Project Summary The applicant proposes to add a single drive-thru lane; associated menu board and intercom; and pick up window to an existing 4,267-square foot fast-food restaurant building and parking lot. New order PAGE 4 OF 12 SUBJECT: 15475 Los Gatos Boulevard/V-21-001 and U-21-005 DATE: November 4, 2022 S:\PLANNING COMMISSION REPORTS\2022\11-09-2022\Item 4 - 15475 Los Gatos Boulevard\Staff Report. 15475 Los Gatos Boulevard.docx DISCUSSION (continued): and pick-up windows are proposed to be installed on the front (east) elevation of the existing building. The front door is proposed to be relocated to the north elevation. The proposed minor window and door changes do not significantly modify the building’s exterior. Parking stalls at the front of the building are proposed to be reconfigured to accommodate the drive-thru lane. The parking lot will be restriped and the landscape areas adjacent to the proposed drive-thru lane will be enhanced. No additional square footage is proposed for the existing building. The proposed parking meets Town Code requirements. The applicant proposes to modify general business hours (dining and drive-thru) to the following (Condition of Approval 5, Exhibit 4): Existing Business Hours Proposed Business Hours Monday through Friday – 7 a.m. to 11 p.m. Weekends – 7 a.m. to midnight Monday through Thursday – 6 a.m. to 10 p.m. Friday – 6 a.m. to 11 p.m. Saturday – 7 a.m. to 11 p.m. Sunday – 7 a.m. to 10 p.m. The applicant has provided a Project Description and Letter of Justification (Exhibit 8), Site Photographs (Exhibit 9), and Development Plans (Exhibit 17). B. Conceptual Development Advisory Committee The CDAC considered a request by the subject applicant for preliminary review of a proposal for a Variance to allow a drive-in (thru) use at the existing fast-food restaurant (McDonald’s) on the subject site on December 9, 2020. Meeting minutes are included in Exhibit 7. The applicant’s responses to CDAC’s comments are included in Exhibit 8. At that meeting the CDAC discussed numerous items, including the following (underlined). A summary of the applicant’s responses are provided in italics below: • Reduce the volume of the outdoor menu speaker. Applicant Response: The volume of the outdoor menu speaker can be manually adjusted to meet required noise levels. Staff Note: Condition of Approval 7 has been included in the Conditional Use Permit Conditions of Approval to set the outdoor menu speaker to meet the Town’s noise level requirements (Exhibit 4). • Provide screening between business and residential uses to reduce the noise from the outdoor menu speaker. Applicant Response: Landscape screening is proposed to reduce noise from the outdoor menu speaker, see Sheet L1.0, Exhibit 17. The site is not adjacent to residential uses. PAGE 5 OF 12 SUBJECT: 15475 Los Gatos Boulevard/V-21-001 and U-21-005 DATE: November 4, 2022 S:\PLANNING COMMISSION REPORTS\2022\11-09-2022\Item 4 - 15475 Los Gatos Boulevard\Staff Report. 15475 Los Gatos Boulevard.docx DISCUSSION (continued): Sheet EX-1, Exhibit 17 provides a diagram showing the distance to neighboring residential uses. • The existing ordinance prohibits drive-thru, but there is a current demand for contactless food service. Applicant Response: The applicant’s letter of justification describes the demand for contactless ordering and food service due to the on-going pandemic. The applicant’s letter also describes the need to provide service for a diverse customer population including people with disabilities, illnesses and customers with different family status, job status, and socio-economic backgrounds (Exhibit 8). • Need more information on how the use affects traffic. Applicant Response: A Drive-Thru Queue Analysis and Traffic Impact Analysis have been prepared and peer reviewed by the Town’s Traffic consultants (Exhibit 12 and 11). Staff Note: See Traffic discussion provided in a later section of this report. C. Variance The applicant is requesting a Variance from Town Code Section 29.10.045 (b) to allow a drive-thru restaurant use where the Town Code strictly prohibits the use in all zones. As required by Section 29.20.170 of the Town Code, the deciding body, on the basis of the evidence submitted at the hearing, may grant a variance if it finds that: 1. Because of special circumstances applicable to the property, including size, shape, topography, location or surroundings, the strict application of this ordinance deprives such property of privileges enjoyed by other properties in the vicinity and under identical zone; and 2. The granting of a variance would not constitute a grant of special privileges inconsistent with the limitations upon other properties in the vicinity and zone which such property is situated. The applicant has provided the following justifications for the required Variance findings (Exhibit 8): 1. In regard to the first finding, McDonald’s property is situated in a commercial zone, specifically within the CH Zone or Restricted Highway Commercial Zone, which is far from residential uses and is surrounded by similar commercial establishments. McDonald’s is deprived of privileges that other properties in the same zone are enjoying. McDonald’s customers do not have the same access to convenience and PAGE 6 OF 12 SUBJECT: 15475 Los Gatos Boulevard/V-21-001 and U-21-005 DATE: November 4, 2022 S:\PLANNING COMMISSION REPORTS\2022\11-09-2022\Item 4 - 15475 Los Gatos Boulevard\Staff Report. 15475 Los Gatos Boulevard.docx DISCUSSION (continued): safety that Jack-in-the Box offers its customers because the latter has an existing drive- thru. McDonald’s is deprived of serving diverse members of the public who would benefit from ordering food from a drive-thru. Some of these people include handicapped persons who may prefer not to leave their vehicles to order food and parents who would rather grab food on the go than dining inside with their children. 2. In regard to finding two, granting of a Variance would not constitute a grant of special privileges inconsistent with the limitations upon other business in the same vicinity and zone because Jack-in-the-Box, another restaurant in the same zone (CH-Restricted Commercial Highway) currently has an approved drive-thru. D. Conditional Use Permit The existing restaurant has an approved CUP (U-76-18 and U-76-18A) to allow a restaurant use (McDonald’s) with the sale of packaged foods and non-alcoholic beverages for consumption on- and off-site (Exhibit 5). The applicant proposes to modify the CUP to allow the proposed drive-thru restaurant use with modified business hours (Exhibit 8). In order to grant approval of a CUP for the proposed drive-thru restaurant project, the deciding body must make the following findings: 1. The proposed use of the property is essential or desirable to the public convenience or welfare; 2. The proposed use will not impair the integrity and character of the zone; 3. The proposed use would not be detrimental to public health, safety, or general welf are; and 4. The proposed use of the property is in harmony with the various elements or objectives of the General Plan and the purposes of the Town Code. The applicant has provided the following justifications for the required CUP findings (Exhibit 8): 1. In regard to the first finding, the proposed drive-thru is desirable to the public convenience because it makes ordering food quicker than ordering or dining inside the restaurant. Customers do not have to park their vehicles and walk into the restaurant if they do not intend to dine in. 2. As required by finding two, the proposed drive-thru will not impair the integrity of the zone which already has other similar types of commercial establishments, restaurants, and retail businesses. A drive-thru use is already existing and approved for Jack-in-the- Box, which is located in the same zone, CH – Restricted Commercial Highway. PAGE 7 OF 12 SUBJECT: 15475 Los Gatos Boulevard/V-21-001 and U-21-005 DATE: November 4, 2022 S:\PLANNING COMMISSION REPORTS\2022\11-09-2022\Item 4 - 15475 Los Gatos Boulevard\Staff Report. 15475 Los Gatos Boulevard.docx DISCUSSION (continued): 3. In regard to the third finding, the proposed use would not be detrimental to public health, safety, or general welfare because it promotes a healthier, safer, and more efficient way of ordering food. The drive-thru allows handicap persons to buy food without leaving their vehicles. Customers do not have to be in an enclosed space with other people while ordering in a drive-thru, reducing the risk of potentially being exposed to viruses like Covid-19 and its variants. 4. In regard to the final finding, the proposed use is not in conformance with the Town Code and General Plan therefore a variance is being requested. E. Parking and Circulation The existing site is currently developed with a 4,267-square foot commercial building, with a total of 92 parking spaces. Pursuant to Section 29.10.150 (c)(9) of the Town Code , restaurants outside of the downtown require one parking space for each 235 square feet of gross floor area. The existing restaurant requires a total of 19 parking spaces. The proposed parking lot reconfiguration to accommodate the drive thru lane and circulation will reduce the parking to a total of 77 parking spaces, a reduction of 15 parking spaces. The proposed number of parking spaces exceed the Town Code’s parking requirements. The proposed single drive-thru lane will be oriented on the south and east side of the existing building (Exhibit 17). The parking lot will be restriped. F. Traffic and Public Improvements Traffic Impact Analysis A Traffic Impact Analysis was prepared for the subject site by the applicant’s Traffic Engineering and Transportation Planning Consultant, TJW (Attachment B, Exhibit 10). The Town’s Traffic Consultant, TJKM, peer reviewed the document (Exhibit 11). Based on the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation, 10 th Edition and the proposed addition of a drive-thru window, the drive-thru lane will attract more customers. The biggest increase is in the morning peak hours during which there is a 60 percent increase in trips. There will be about 64 more peak hour trips in the morning, which results from 32 vehicles arriving and leaving the site. Based on the large data base of ITE statistics, half of the trips are made by vehicles already driving on the street, categorizing them as pass -by trips. The Town’s Traffic Consultant states, that it could be argued that passby percentages would be even higher than the ITE-quoted 50 percent, making the net trips noted in the table conservatively high. The report states that it is not expected that significant traffic issues will be created by the additional traffic generated by the drive-thru at the proposed site. PAGE 8 OF 12 SUBJECT: 15475 Los Gatos Boulevard/V-21-001 and U-21-005 DATE: November 4, 2022 S:\PLANNING COMMISSION REPORTS\2022\11-09-2022\Item 4 - 15475 Los Gatos Boulevard\Staff Report. 15475 Los Gatos Boulevard.docx DISCUSSION (continued): Traffic Impact Fees Per Town Policy “All Projects that generate one or more new Average Daily Trips are required to pay Transportation Impact Fees, previously known as Traffic Impact Mitigation Fees. Fees shall be calculated by multiplying net new ADT by the per trip amount in place at the time the fees are paid.” The addition of a drive-thru window will generate an additional 532 daily trips with the 50 percent reduction for pass-by trips resulting in a net increase in daily trips of 266 in accordance with ITE. Condition of Approval 24 (Exhibit 3), requires that prior to the issuance of any building permits, the Owner/Applicant shall pay traffic impact fees for transportation improvements. The final traffic impact mitigation fee for this project shall be calculated from the final plans using the current fee schedule and rate schedule in effect at the time, using a comparison between the existing and proposed uses. Based on current fees, the estimated Traffic Impact Mitigation Fees are estimated to be $269,990.00. Drive-Thru Queue Analysis A Drive-Thru Queue Analysis was prepared for the subject site by the applicant’s Traffic Engineering and Transportation Planning Consultant, TJW (Exhibit 12). The Town’s Traffic Consultant, TJKM, peer reviewed the document and concluded that provisions for queuing at the proposed drive-thru lane are very satisfactory and will not impact surrounding businesses (Exhibit 11). Vehicle Miles Traveled The Town’s Traffic Consultant states that the proposed addition of the drive-thru lane at the existing restaurant can be classified as local serving retail project, which technically does not create new trips or Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) in the urban setting, but redistributes existing traffic. The Town’s Traffic Consultant concluded that this project has no significant VMT impacts (Exhibit 11). Although, the Town’s Traffic Consultant’s statement appears to contradict what both consultants stated regarding new average daily trips in accordance with ITE, as noted above, the consultant is saying no new trips should be factored in for the VMT analysis because it is a local serving retail project. In other words, the proposed project will generate new trips, but they will come from the local area and not create a significant VMT impact. G. Air Quality, Energy, and Greenhouse Gases An Emissions Modeling, Air Quality, Energy, and Greenhouse Gases Determination was prepared by the Town’s Environmental Consultant, EMC Planning Group Inc., for the proposed project (Exhibit 13). The results of these analyses found that the operational PAGE 9 OF 12 SUBJECT: 15475 Los Gatos Boulevard/V-21-001 and U-21-005 DATE: November 4, 2022 S:\PLANNING COMMISSION REPORTS\2022\11-09-2022\Item 4 - 15475 Los Gatos Boulevard\Staff Report. 15475 Los Gatos Boulevard.docx DISCUSSION (continued): criteria pollutants would be reduced by the addition of the drive -thru lane and will have no significant impacts related to regional air quality or greenhouse gasses, and will have essentially the same energy demand. H. Noise An Environmental Noise Assessment was prepared by the Town’s Acoustic Sub-Consultant, WJV Acoustics, to determine if significant noise impacts will be produced by the proposed project and describe mitigation measures for noise impacts (Attachment C, Exhibit 10). The assessment evaluated the proposed project, drive-thru intercom system, and Drive-Thru Queue Analysis and Traffic Impact Analysis prepared by TJW Engineering. The proposed drive-thru intercom system provides an adjustable noise level at the speaker system (Exhibit 16). Condition of Approval 7 has been included in the Conditional Use Permit Conditions of Approval to set the outdoor menu speaker to meet the Town’s noise level requirements (Exhibit 4). Traffic noise exposure along Los Gatos Boulevard, in the vicinity of the project site, was calculated for both background conditions and background plus proposed project conditions. The project would not be expected to result in any increases in traffic noise exposure along Los Gatos Boulevard, in the vicinity of the project. I. Tree Impacts An arborist report was prepared by the Town’s Consulting Arborist, Monarch Consulting Arborists, LLC, noting that the site has a total of 46 trees of nine different species (Attachment D, Exhibit 10). Of the 46 trees onsite, 20 trees are in good condition, 22 trees in fair condition, one in poor condition, one in very poor condition, and two coast redwoods are dead. The project proposes the removal of the two dead coast redwood trees (#489 and #491). The applicant proposes a total of nine replacement tre es including six trees located on the northern edge of the property to provide additional landscape /noise buffer between the proposed drive-thru lane and intercom system and the adjacent commercial site (Sheet, L1.0, Exhibit 17). J. General Plan The 2020 General Plan Land Use designation for the site is Mixed Commercial Use Commercial. The Mixed Use Commercial designation permits a mixture of retail, office, and residential in a mixed-use project, along with lodging, service, auto-related businesses, non-manufacturing industrial uses, recreational uses, and restaurants. Projects developed under this designation shall maintain the smalltown, residential scale and natural environments of PAGE 10 OF 12 SUBJECT: 15475 Los Gatos Boulevard/V-21-001 and U-21-005 DATE: November 4, 2022 S:\PLANNING COMMISSION REPORTS\2022\11-09-2022\Item 4 - 15475 Los Gatos Boulevard\Staff Report. 15475 Los Gatos Boulevard.docx DISCUSSION (continued): adjacent residential neighborhoods, as well as provide prime orientation to arterial street frontages and proper transitions and buffers to adjacent residential properties. Applicable goals and policies of the 2020 General Plan Land Use Element include, but are not limited to the following: • Goal LU-9 - To provide residents with adequate commercial and industrial services. • Policy LU-9.2 - Maintain a variety of commercial uses, including a strong Downtown commercial area combined with Los Gatos Boulevard and strong neighborhood commercial centers to meet the shopping needs of residents and to preserve the small- town atmosphere. • Goal LU-13 - To promote appropriate and compatible development along Los Gatos Boulevard that complements the whole Town and serves residents and families. • Policy LU-13.2 - Commercial activity along Los Gatos Boulevard shall complement the whole Town and shall provide a dependable source of income, employment opportunities, goods, and services. K. CEQA Determination The project is Categorically Exempt pursuant to the adopted Guidelines for the Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), Section 15301, Existing Facilities. A memorandum providing information as to how the project is categorically exempt from CEQA was prepared by the Town’s Environmental Consultant, EMC Planning Group Inc. (Exhibit 10). As part of the memorandum, technical documents regarding the project’s Traffic Impact Analysis, Environmental Noise Assessment, and Arborist Report were prepared and are attached (Attachments B, C, and D, Exhibit 10). In the evaluation of the technical documents, it was determined that with conditions of approval there would be no significant impacts as a result of the proposed project. PUBLIC COMMENTS: The applicant provided a summary of their efforts to communicate with adjacent tenants and property owners and provided signed petitions of support (Exhibit 14 and Exhibit 15). The applicant has summarized that a total of 2,619 signatures of customer support were collected between August 2021 and October 2022 with 1,390 people indicating they live in the Town of Los Gatos. Six neighboring residents canvased stated they supported the proposed drive-thru. In contrast, six residents indicated they were opposed to the proposed project due to concerns regarding idling vehicles, pollution, and noise issues. Written notice was sent to property owners and tenants within 300 feet of the subject property. At time of preparation of this report, no public comment has been received. PAGE 11 OF 12 SUBJECT: 15475 Los Gatos Boulevard/V-21-001 and U-21-005 DATE: November 4, 2022 S:\PLANNING COMMISSION REPORTS\2022\11-09-2022\Item 4 - 15475 Los Gatos Boulevard\Staff Report. 15475 Los Gatos Boulevard.docx CONCLUSION: A. Summary The applicant is requesting approval of a Variance application to allow a prohibited use, a drive-thru restaurant, and requesting approval of a modification to a CUP for a drive-thru restaurant use with modified hours of operation. The project includes adding a single drive- thru lane to the existing restaurant’s parking lot, intercom system, and an outdoor digital menu board. In addition, the project includes minor window and door modifications to the existing building to accommodate the drive-thru, restriping, minor reconfiguration of the existing parking lot, and landscaping. The technical reports provide that the proposed project would not result in a significant impact to air quality, energy, or greenhouse gases. The project would not be expected to result in any increases in traffic noise exposure along Los Gatos Boulevard, in the vicinity of the project. The noise impacts can be mitigated by a condition of approval requiring the volume level on the intercom system to meet Town Code noise level requirements. The Traffic Impact Analysis states that traffic generated by the drive-thru at the proposed site will not create any significant traffic issues. The Town’s Traffic Consultant concluded that provisions for queuing at the proposed drive-thru lane is very satisfactory and the site size can accommodate the proposal and that this project has no significant VMT impacts. The proposed drive-thru restaurant use is a prohibited use in all zones pursuant to Town Code Section 29.10.045 (b). B. Recommendation Based on the analysis above, staff recommends denial of the Variance application and Conditional Use Permit application as the proposed drive-thru restaurant use is a prohibited use in all zones pursuant to Town Code Section 29.10.045 (b), as discussed in this report. PAGE 12 OF 12 SUBJECT: 15475 Los Gatos Boulevard/V-21-001 and U-21-005 DATE: November 4, 2022 S:\PLANNING COMMISSION REPORTS\2022\11-09-2022\Item 4 - 15475 Los Gatos Boulevard\Staff Report. 15475 Los Gatos Boulevard.docx CONCLUSION (continued): C. Alternatives Alternatively, the Commission can: 1. Approve the applications by taking the following actions: a. Make the findings that the proposed project is Categorically Exempt, pursuant to the adopted Guidelines for the implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act, Section 15301: Existing Facilities (Exhibit 2); b. Make the required findings as required by Section 29.20.170 of the Town Code for granting a Variance (Exhibit 2); c. Make the findings as required by Section 29.20.190 of the Town Code for granting approval of a CUP (Exhibit 2); and d. Approve Variance Application V-21-001, and Conditional Use Permit Application U- 21-005 with the conditions contained in Exhibits 3 and 4 and the development plans in Exhibit 17. 2. Approve the applications with additional and/or modified conditions; or 3. Continue to the matter to a date certain with specific direction. EXHIBITS: 1. Location Map 2. Required Findings 3. Recommended Conditions of Approval – Variance 4. Recommended Conditions of Approval – Conditional Use Permit 5. Existing Conditional Use Permit – U-76-18A and B 6. Existing Conditional Use Permit – U-83-14 - Jack-in-the-Box 7. December 9, 2020, Conceptual Development Advisory Committee Meeting Minutes 8. Applicant’s Project Description and Letter of Justification, received January 14, 2022 9. Site Photographs 10. Environmental Consultant’s CEQA Categorical Exemption Memorandum and Technical Reports 11. Town’s Traffic Peer Review, received June 8, 2021 12. Applicant’s Drive-Through Queue Analysis, dated February 3, 2021 13. Environmental Consultant’s Emissions Modeling, Air Quality, Energy and Greenhouse Gases Determination Memorandum 14. Summary of Applicant’s Outreach, received October 6, 2022 15. Applicant’s Additional Outreach, received October 28, 2022 16. Menu Board and Drive-Thru Canopy Details 17. Development Plans LOS GATOS BLBENEDICT LNCARLTON AVGARD E N L N HIGHWAY 17SUNRA Y D R 15475 Los Gatos Boulevard 0 0.250.125 Miles ° EXHIBIT 1 This Page Intentionally Left Blank S:\PLANNING COMMISSION REPORTS\2022\11-09-2022\Item 4 - 15475 Los Gatos Boulevard\Exhibit 2 - Required Findings.docx EXHIBIT 2 PLANNING COMMISSION – November 9, 2022 REQUIRED FINDINGS AND CONSIDERATIONS FOR: 15475 Los Gatos Boulevard Variance Application V-21-001 Conditional Use Permit Application U-21-005 Requesting Approval of a Variance to Allow a Drive-Thru Use at an Existing Restaurant (McDonald's) and Modification to a Conditional Use Permit for a Drive- Thru Restaurant on Property Zoned CH. APN 424-19-065 PROPERTY OWNER: Franchise Realty Interstate Corporation APPLICANT: Mike Yao, Core States Group FINDINGS Required findings for CEQA: ■ The project is Categorically Exempt pursuant to the adopted Guidelines for the Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act, Section 15301: Existing Facilities. The project consists of minor alterations to an existing structure involving negligible expansion of the existing restaurant use by the addition of a drive-thru lane. Required findings for granting a Variance application: ■ As required by Section 29.20.170 of the Town Code for granting a Variance application: (1) Because of special circumstances applicable to the property, including size, shape, topography, location or surroundings, the strict application of this ordinance deprives such property of privileges enjoyed by other properties in the vicinity and under identical zone; and (2) The granting of a variance would not constitute a grant of special privileges inconsistent with the limitations upon other properties in the vicinity and zone which such property is situated. Required Findings for a Conditional Use Permit: ■ As required by Section 29.20.190 of the Town Code for granting a Conditional Use Permit: The deciding body, on the basis of the evidence submitted at the hearing, may grant a conditional use permit when specifically authorized by the provisions of the Town Code if it finds that: 1. The proposed use is essential and desirable to the public convenience; and 2. The proposed use would not impair the integrity of the zone, in that the proposed use is a commercial use and would be located in a commercial zone; and 3. The proposed use would not be detrimental to public health, safety, or general welfare, as the conditions placed on the permit and existing regulations would maintain the welfare of the community; and 4. The proposed use is in conformance with the Town Code and General Plan. This Page Intentionally Left Blank S:\PLANNING COMMISSION REPORTS\2022\11-09-2022\Item 4 - 15475 Los Gatos Boulevard\Exhibit 3 - Recommended Conditions of Approval - Variance.docx PLANNING COMMISSION – November 9, 2022 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 15475 Los Gatos Boulevard Variance Application V-21-001 Requesting Approval of a Variance to Allow a Drive-Thru Use at an Existing Restaurant (McDonald's) and Modification to a Conditional Use Permit for a Drive-Thru Restaurant on Property Zoned CH. APN 424-19-065 PROPERTY OWNER: Franchise Realty Interstate Corporation APPLICANT: Mike Yao, Core States Group TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT: Planning Division 1. APPROVAL: This application shall be completed in accordance with all of the conditions of approval and in substantial compliance with the approved plans. Any changes or modifications to the approved plans and/or business operation shall be approved by the Community Development Director, DRC or the Planning Commission depending on the scope of the changes. 2. EXPIRATION: The approval will expire two years from the approval date pursuant to Section 29.20.320 of the Town Code, unless the approval has been vested. 3. TREE REMOVAL PERMIT: A Tree Removal Permit shall be obtained for any protected trees to be removed, prior to the issuance of a building or grading permit. 4. EXISTING TREES: All existing trees shown on the plan and trees required to remain or to be planted are specific subjects of approval of this plan and must remain on the site. 5. TREE FENCING: Protective tree fencing, and other protection measures shall be placed at the drip line of existing trees prior to issuance of demolition and building permits and shall remain through all phases of construction. Include a tree protection plan with the construction plans. 6. TREE STAKING: All newly planted trees shall be double-staked using rubber tree ties. 7. ARBORIST REQUIREMENTS: The developer shall implement, at their cost, all recommendations identified in the Arborist’s report. These recommendations must be incorporated in the building permit plans and completed prior to issuance of a building permit where applicable. A Compliance Memorandum shall be prepared by the applicant and submitted with the building permit application detailing how the recommendations have or will be addressed. 8. WATER EFFICIENCY LANDSCAPE ORDINANCE: The final landscape plan shall meet the requirements of the Town of Los Gatos Water Conservation Ordinance or the State Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance, whichever is more restrictive. Submittal of a Landscape Documentation Package pursuant to WELO is required prior to issuance of a building permit. A review fee based on the current fee schedule adopted by the Town Council is required when working landscape and irrigation plans are submitted for review. A EXHIBIT 3 S:\PLANNING COMMISSION REPORTS\2022\11-09-2022\Item 4 - 15475 Los Gatos Boulevard\Exhibit 3 - Recommended Conditions of Approval - Variance.docx completed WELO Certificate of Completion is required prior to final inspection/certificate of occupancy. 9. TOWN INDEMNITY: Applicants are notified that Town Code Section 1.10.115 requires that any applicant who receives a permit or entitlement from the Town shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the Town and its officials in any action brought by a third party to overturn, set aside, or void the permit or entitlement. This requirement is a condition of approval of all such permits and entitlements whether or not expressly set forth in the approval and may be secured to the satisfaction of the Town Attorney. 10. COMPLIANCE MEMORANDUM: A memorandum shall be prepared and submitted with the building plans detailing how the Conditions of Approval will be addressed. Building Division 11. PERMITS REQUIRED: A Building Permit shall be required for any alterations or additions to the existing commercial building or tenant space. 12. APPLICABLE CODES: The current codes, as amended and adopted by the Town of Los Gatos as of the date of Building Permit application. 13. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: The Conditions of Approval must be blue lined in full on the cover sheet of the construction plans. A Compliance Memorandum shall be prepared and submitted with the building permit application detailing how the Conditions of Approval will be addressed. 14. SIZE OF PLANS: Minimum size 24” x 36”, maximum size 30” x 42”. 15. SITE ACCESSIBLTY: At least on accessible route within the boundary of the stie shall be provided from public transportation stops, accessible parking and accessible passenger loading zones and public streets or sidewalks to the accessible building entrance that they serve. The accessible route shall, to the maximum extent feasible, coincide with the route for the general public. At least one accessible route shall connect all accessible buildings, facilities, elements, and spaces that are on the same site. 16. APPROVALS REQUIRED: The project requires the following departments and agencies approval before issuing a building permit: a. Community Development – Planning Division: (408) 354-6874 b. Engineering/Parks & Public Works Department: (408) 399-5771 c. Santa Clara County Fire Department: (408) 378-4010 d. West Valley Sanitation District: (408) 378-2407 e. Santa Clara County Environmental Health Department: (408) 918 -3479 f. Local School District: The Town will forward the paperwork to the appropriate school district(s) for processing. A copy of the paid receipt is required p rior to permit issuance. TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE DIRECTOR OF PARKS & PUBLIC WORKS: Engineering Division 17. GENERAL: The adjacent public right-of-way shall be kept clear of all job-related mud, silt, concrete, dirt and other construction debris at the end of the day. Dirt and debris shall not be washed into storm drainage facilities. The storing of goods and materials on the sidewalk and/or the street will not be allowed unless an encroachment permit is issued by S:\PLANNING COMMISSION REPORTS\2022\11-09-2022\Item 4 - 15475 Los Gatos Boulevard\Exhibit 3 - Recommended Conditions of Approval - Variance.docx the Engineering Division of the Parks and Public Works Department. The Owner and/or Applicant's representative in charge shall be at the job site during all w orking hours. Failure to maintain the public right-of-way according to this condition may result in the issuance of correction notices, citations, or stop work orders and the Town performing the required maintenance at the Owner's expense. 18. APPROVAL: This application shall be completed in accordance with all the conditions of approval listed below and in substantial compliance with the latest reviewed and approved development plans. Any changes or modifications to the approved plans or conditions of approvals shall be approved by the Town Engineer. 19. CONSTRUCTION PLAN REQUIREMENTS: Construction drawings shall comply with Section 1 (Construction Plan Requirements) of the Town’s Engineering Design Standards, which are available for download from the Town’s website. 20. DESIGN CHANGES: Any proposed changes to the approved plans shall be subject to the approval of the Town prior to the commencement of any a nd all altered work. The Owner and/or Applicant’s project engineer shall notify, in writing, the Town Engineer at least seventy-two (72) hours in advance of all the proposed changes. Any approved changes shall be incorporated into the final “as-built” plans. 21. PLANS AND STUDIES: Any post-project traffic or parking counts, or other studies imposed by the Planning Commission or Town Council shall be funded by the Owner and/or Applicant. 22. TRAFFIC STUDY: Any development of land use that generates greater traff ic impacts than those assumed in the traffic study report may require an updated traffic study in accordance with the Town’s traffic impact policy. 23. TRAFFIC IMPACT MITIGATION FEE: Prior to the issuance of any building permits, the Owner/Applicant shall pay the project's proportional share of transportation improvements needed to serve cumulative development within the Town of Los Gatos. The final traffic impact mitigation fee for this project shall be calculated from the final plans using the current fee schedule and rate schedule in effect at the time, using a comparison between the existing and proposed uses. 24. CONSTRUCTION HOURS: All construction activities, including the delivery of construction materials, labors, heavy equipment, supplies, etc., shall be limited to the hours of 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., weekdays and 9:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. Saturdays, holidays excluded. The Town may authorize, on a case-by-case basis, alternate construction hours. The Owner and/or Applicant shall provide written notice twenty-four (24) hours in advance of modified construction hours. Approval of this request is at discretion of the Town. 25. CONSTRUCTION NOISE: Between the hours of 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., weekdays and 9:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. Saturdays, construction, alteration or repair activities shall be allowed. No individual piece of equipment shall produce a noise level exceeding eighty-five (85) dBA at twenty-five (25) feet from the source. If the device is located within a structure on the property, the measurement shall be made at distances as close to twenty-five (25) feet from the device as possible. The noise level at any point outside of the property plane shall not exceed eighty-five (85) dBA. 26. BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES (BMPs): The Owner and/or Applicant is responsible for ensuring that all contractors are aware of all storm water quality measures and that such S:\PLANNING COMMISSION REPORTS\2022\11-09-2022\Item 4 - 15475 Los Gatos Boulevard\Exhibit 3 - Recommended Conditions of Approval - Variance.docx measures are implemented. Best Management Practices (BMPs) shall be maintained and be placed for all areas that have been graded or disturbed and for all material, equipment and/or operations that need protection. Removal of BMPs (temporary removal during construction activities) shall be replaced at the end of each working day. Failure to comply with the construction BMP will result in the issuance of correction notices, citations, or stop work orders. 27. COVERED TRUCKS: All trucks transporting materials to and from the site shall be covered. 28. RESTORATION OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS: The Owner or their representative shall repair or replace all existing improvements not designated for removal that are damaged or removed because of the Owner or their representative's operations. Improvements such as, but not limited to: curbs, gutters, sidewalks, driveways, signs, pavements, raised pavement markers, thermoplastic pavement markings, etc., shall be repaired and replaced to a condition equal to or better than the original condition. Any new concrete shall be free of stamps, logos, names, graffiti, etc. Any concrete identified that is displaying a stamp or equal shall be removed and replaced at the Contractor’s sole expense and no additional compensation shall be allowed therefore. Existing improvement to be repaired or replaced shall be at the direction of the Engineering Construction Inspector and shall comply with all Title 24 Disabled Access provisions. The restoration of all improvements identified by the Engineering Construction Inspector shall be completed before the issuance of a certificate of occupancy. The Owner or their representative shall request a walk-through with the Engineering Construction Inspector before the start of construction to verify existing conditions. 29. IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT: The Owner shall enter into an agreement to construct public improvements in accordance with Town Code Section 24.40.020. The Owner shall supply suitable securities for all public improvements that are part of the development in a form acceptable to the Town in the amount of 100% performance and 100% labor and materials prior to the issuance of any encroachment or building permit. The Owner shall provide two (2) copies of documents verifying the cost of the public improvements to the satisfaction of the Engineering Division of the Parks and Public Works Department. An electronic copy (PDF) of the executed agreement shall be submitted to the Engineering Division of the Parks and Public Works Department prior to the issuance of any encroachment or building permit. 30. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS: The following improvements shall be installed by the Owner. Plans for those improvements shall be prepared by a California registered civil engineer, reviewed and approved by the Town, and guaranteed by contract, Faithful Performance Security and Labor & Materials Security before the issuance of any building permits. The improvements must be completed and accepted by the Town before a Certificate of Occupancy for any new building can be issued. a. Reconstruct driveways on to the Los Gatos Boulevard frontage. b. Repaint curb along frontage. c. Renovate sidewalk along frontage in order to maintain/create a 5-foot path of travel. d. Ensure all improvements are ADA compliant. S:\PLANNING COMMISSION REPORTS\2022\11-09-2022\Item 4 - 15475 Los Gatos Boulevard\Exhibit 3 - Recommended Conditions of Approval - Variance.docx TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE SANTA CLARA COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT: 31. Review of this Developmental proposal is limited to acceptability of site access, water supply and may include specific additional requirements as they pertain to fire department operations and shall not be construed as a substitute for formal plan review to determine compliance with adopted model codes. Prior to performing any work, the applicant shall make application to, and receive from, the Building Department all applicable construction permits. 32. Interior changes are subject to further review of systems modifications, to include fire sprinkler and hood suppression systems. 33. Fire department access to the site, the building, and to all fire production systems shall be maintained at all times, in accordance with CFC Chapter 5. No obstruction such as vehicles, storage, and other materials or objects shall be placed or kept near fire hydrants, fire department inlet connections, or fire protection system control valves in a manner that would prevent such equipment or fire hydrants from being immediately discernible. 34. This review shall not be construed to be an approval of a violati on of the provisions of the California Fire Code or of other laws or regulations of the jurisdiction. A permit presuming to give authority to violate or cancel the provisions of the fire code or other such laws or regulations shall not be valid. Any addition to or alteration of approved construction documents shall be approved in advance. [CFC, Ch.1, 105.3.6] This Page Intentionally Left Blank S:\PLANNING COMMISSION REPORTS\2022\11-09-2022\Item 4 - 15475 Los Gatos Boulevard\Exhibit 4 - Recommended Conditions of Approval - Conditional Use Permit.docx PLANNING COMMISSION – November 9, 2022 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 15475 Los Gatos Boulevard Conditional Use Permit Application U-21-005 Requesting Approval of a Variance to Allow a Drive-Thru Use at an Existing Restaurant (McDonald's) and Modification to a Conditional Use Permit for a Drive-Thru Restaurant on Property Zoned CH. APN 424-19-065 PROPERTY OWNER: Franchise Realty Interstate Corporation APPLICANT: Mike Yao, Core States Group TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT: Planning Division 1. APPROVAL: This application shall be completed in accordance with all of the conditions of approval and in substantial compliance with the approved plans. Any intensification beyond this authorized use requires a Conditional Use Permit amendment. 2. EXPIRATION: The approval will expire two years from the approval date pursuant to Section 29.20.320 of the Town Code, unless the approval has been vested per Section 29.20.335 of the Town Code. Reasonable extensions of time not exceeding one year may be granted upon application and can be granted if approved by the deciding body prior to the expiration date. Therefore, it is recommended that applications for a time extension be filed with the Community Development Department at least 60 days prior to the expiration date of the approval. 3. LAPSE FOR DISCONTINUANCE: If the activity for which the Conditional Use Permit has been granted is discontinued for a period of one (1) year, the approval lapses pursuant to Section 29.20.340 of the Zoning Ordinance. 4. RESTAURANT USE: A drive-thru restaurant is permitted. 5. HOURS: General business hours (dining and drive-thru) are Monday through Thursday – 6:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m., Friday – 6:00 a.m. to 11:00 p.m., Saturday – 7:00 a.m. to 11:00 p.m., and Sunday – 7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m.. 6. through Thursdays, and 7:00 a.m. to midnight on Fridays and Saturdays. 7. NOISE LEVELS: The drive-thru intercom system noise levels shall be set at or below 89 dB (at four feet) between the hours of 6:00 a.m. and 1:00 p.m., at or below 93 dB (at four feet) between the hours of 1:00 p.m. and 10:00 p.m., and at or below 82 dB (at four feet) between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 6:00 a.m.. 8. BUSINESS LICENSE: A business license from the Town of Los Gatos Finance Department including a Certificate of Use and Occupancy approval from Planning must be obtained prior to the commencement of any new or change of use. 9. LIVE ENTERTAINMENT: Live entertainment until 10:00 p.m. is permitted in conformance with the Town Policy regulating Late Night Entertainment. 10. CONFORMANCE WITH CODE: No part of this approval shall be construed to permit a violation of any part of the Code of the Town of Los Gatos. EXHIBIT 4 S:\PLANNING COMMISSION REPORTS\2022\11-09-2022\Item 4 - 15475 Los Gatos Boulevard\Exhibit 4 - Recommended Conditions of Approval - Conditional Use Permit.docx 11. COMPLIANCE WITH LOCAL, STATE, and FEDERAL LAWS: The subject use shall be conducted in full compliance with all local, state, and federal laws. 12. TOWN INDEMNITY: Applicants are notified that Town Code Section 1.10.115 requires that any applicant who receives a permit or entitlement from the Town shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the Town and its officials in any action brought by a third party to overturn, set aside, or void the permit or entitlement. This requirement is a condition of approval of all such permits and entitlements whether or not expressly set forth in the approval and may be secured to the satisfaction of the Town Attorney. 13. COMPLIANCE MEMORANDUM: A memorandum, in compliance with standard Town practice, shall be prepared and submitted with the building permit d etailing how the conditions of approval will be addressed. ... McDonald' B Corpot',1 t. :i 011 l'l111111h1g lkpa, t11w11t :!!>1-CYl'l.! ?li'/l E. Ba yshol'e Drive, �;11ih! GOD Palo Alto, Ca lifornia 9'130:J He: Condit.i.011nl llf,c• Pcrmil lJ··'/(i--18 Conditional Une Permit lJ··7G-l8J\ J\rehi tect1.n:·c ;rncl Site• Appl i cat: j <)ll !.-�-'7 G-· 0 r> Subd:i vision i\pp .licc1t.i.011 l·l--'/l.i--31 (�cnt lemt�n: On Deccmbet' 15, ] lJ'/6, the: 'l'own I\1•cld_ i:ccllll'<..· dlld Sit I.! Cornmi tt<!e approved the above app Li.c<1 t.iour; l 'tiqt1 ef;t i ng arp roval foi' the construction of .:1 1·ei;t,un·,rnt \,:i 1.1 l lw :;.ale, ac ret.:1il or Jhlckaged foodB and non--,tlcoholic: b0v1-�ra ge:; fq1• con�;urnpi:.ion 011 and off the :site, <1.nd a ?.--lot �•n1bdiv.1sio11 for 1! dCt'(!1:; of pro1w1•ty locatedon Los Gatos Bo11levc1rd (1.(i'IOO Block), i:uL:ii:•cl to tlw fo] low:i.r1g conditions: Condit ionc1l Use PPrrni U;: ] . On-��itl� l:i.ghtini nhul] he rc�vieHed ,:i�; 1wcc,;s,1;•y lu inm1rc that no li ght will Bhinc 011 land in an y reshlt-111. i,\ I. zone. 2.Hourr; of c>peri.1tic)n sl\cill l)(! ? d.Jn. t<) 11 p.JH., (>11 \·lt:-Pk<lt1ys,and 7 a. 111. to micl11 i i1,ht on I' t•:i_d;1yi; ,rnd 3.1 t urdayn. 1.Tho pr0pm;ed desi gn of the roof l,e modified to eliminate.Jio extriri Ol' l'OO.f lH!dllH-;. ?. • That final plans showing r,raciing, ch.•aina ge ) tra.fftc c:i.rcult,tionand lighting be submitted to the satisfaction of the TownEngiJH-!cr. 3.A revised.site and landscaping plan nhall be submitted tothe satif3ft1.ction of the Plannini� Directm' inco1�por•.:\1:in g the chan ges in hui1dine, locilt io1� :illustrate.d on tho revised8ketch .site pl<ll1 idcmtified ar; Exhibit C. 11.Plam,· for the design of the dining area shall be .. submi ttecl . tothe satisf cl.C Hon of. the Pla'nni.11e Di rectox•' pt•:i.or> to any9t{tii:f:f�g pcl'mits bc}ng n;sucd. .If the _Plai'l1_1ing DirGC t<n' lllld · .. c1V1d ctNi��n . • 110 �:A·s'f'Mi,N i·111ti:�1•:-r •• i•.cfiic,tti-iO, • r!osh)\+os; cA1.H·dttN1Ao5oao ... EXHIBIT 5 This Page Intentionally Left Blank EXHIBIT 6 This Page Intentionally Left Blank 110 E. Main Street Los Gatos, CA 95030 ● 408-354-6832 www.losgatosca.gov TOWN OF LOS GATOS CONCEPTUAL DEVELOPMENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE REPORT MINUTES OF THE CONCEPTUAL DEVELOPMENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING DECEMBER 9, 2020 The Conceptual Development Advisory Committee of the Town of Los Gatos conducted a Regular Meeting on December 9, 2020, at 4:30 p.m. This meeting was conducted utilizing teleconferencing and electronic means consistent with State of California Executive Order N-29-20 dated March 17, 2020, regarding the COVID-19 pandemic and was conducted via Zoom. All committee members and staff participated from remote locations and all voting was conducted via roll call vote. In accordance with Executive Order N-29-20, the public could only view the meeting online and not in the Council Chamber. MEETING CALLED TO ORDER AT 4:30 PM ROLL CALL Present: Chair Rob Rennie, Vice Chair Jeffrey Barnett, Mayor Marico Sayoc, Planning Commissioner Melanie Hanssen, and Planning Commissioner Reza Tavana. Absent: None. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE SUBCOMMITTEE REPORTS/COMMISSION MATTERS VERBAL COMMUNICATIONS -None. CONSENT ITEMS (TO BE ACTED UPON BY A SINGLE MOTION) 1.Approval of Minutes – October 14, 2020 MOTION: Motion by Mayor Marico Sayoc to approve the consent calendar. Seconded by Vice Chair Jeffrey Barnett. VOTE: Motion passed unanimously. EXHIBIT 7 PAGE 2 OF 3 MINUTES OF CONCEPTUAL DEVELOPMENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING OF DECEMBER 9, 2020 N:\DEV\CDAC\CDAC MINUTES\2020\12-09-20 Mins.docx PUBLIC HEARINGS 2. 15475 Los Gatos Boulevard Conceptual Development Advisory Committee Application CD-20-006 Requesting a preliminary review of a proposal to request a Variance to allow a drive-in use at an existing restaurant (McDonald’s) on property zoned CH. APN 424-19-065. PROPERTY OWNER: Drew Sanchez APPLICANT: Mike Yao, Core States Group PROJECT PLANNER: Erin Walters Project Planner presented the staff report. Opened Public Comment. Applicant presented the proposal. Closed Public Comment. Committee members discussed the matter and provided the following questions and comments: • Reduce the volume of the outdoor menu speaker. • Provide screening between business and residential uses to reduce the noise from the outdoor menu speaker. • The existing ordinance prohibits drive-thru, but there is a current demand for contactless food service. • If this business is granted a Variance, will others want the same? • This location has ample space for converting parking spaces into a drive-thru lane. • Is this granting special privileges? • The plans are well laid out. • Customers want this type of service for breakfast and lunch. • There are alternatives available, such as, when servers bring the food out to the car. • Should not grant a long-term Variance based on a short-term situation (pandemic/Covid-19). • Not as concerned with idling cars as many current and future vehicles are/will be emissions free. • Need more information on how the use affects traffic. OTHER BUSINESS PAGE 3 OF 3 MINUTES OF CONCEPTUAL DEVELOPMENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING OF DECEMBER 9, 2020 N:\DEV\CDAC\CDAC MINUTES\2020\12-09-20 Mins.docx 3. Review and approve the 2021 Meeting Schedule Calendar MOTION: Motion by Planning Commissioner Melanie Hanssen to approve the 2021 Meeting Schedule Calendar. Seconded by Vice Chair Jeffrey Barnett. VOTE: Motion passed unanimously. ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at 5:03 p.m. This is to certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of the minutes of the December 9, 2020 meeting as approved by the Conceptual Development Advisory Committee. /s/Joel Paulson, AICP, Community Development Director This Page Intentionally Left Blank January 14, 2022 Erin Walters, Associate Planner Community Development Department 110 East Main Street Los Gatos, CA 95030 Direct: 408-354-6867 Office: 408-354-6872 Re: Variance Application and CUP Modification - McDonald’s Drive-Thru Addition – 15475 Los Gatos Blvd. Written Description of Proposed Work - Revised An application for a variance from the Town Code and modification to the CUP is being submitted to allow drive-thru use in the existing McDonald’s restaurant located at 15475 Los Gatos Blvd. A single drive- thru lane is being proposed with an entrance at the southwest side of the property. New order and pick- up windows will be installed on the eastern side of the building but will not alter the exterior design. The existing ADA parking stalls facing Los Gatos Blvd will be reconfigured to fit the new drive-thru lane. Several parking stalls on the south side of the property will be removed to accommodate the drive-thru, but there are more than enough parking remaining to meet code. The entrance to the drive-thru will be marked by a gateway sign and clearance bar, see attached specification. There are 2 sets of ordering points laid out in a tandem configuration, one in front of the other. Each order station will have an order canopy with built in speaker box and an outdoor digital menu board, see attached specifications. Pavement markings like arrows and drive-thru signs will help guide the vehicular flow within the property. Proposed hours of operation of the general business (dining area and drive-thru) is below: Day Time Thursday 6 am - 10 pm Friday 6 am - 11 pm Saturday 7 am - 11 pm Sunday 7 am - 10 pm Monday 6 am - 10 pm Tuesday 6 am - 10 pm Wednesday 6 am - 10 pm EXHIBIT 8 Page 2 Click or tap to enter a date. Letter of Justification - Revised McDonald’s is proposing to add drive-thru in this location to meet the increasing demand for drive-thru ordering, most evident during the recent pandemic. Allowing drive-thru use in the restaurant will provide the community the option to order food in a safer and healthier way. The effects of the pandemic to the user’s needs and behavior requires a change in the existing built environment. Patrons are demanding contactless ordering to reduce the risk of being infected with Covid-19. The addition of drive-thru will also assist in increasing revenue for the restaurant since the business has been impacted negatively by mandatory closure of the dining room. The proposed drive-thru use is in the best interest of public convenience, safety and necessity even as the pandemic eases. The drive-thru serves a diverse type of customers in the community with different socio- economic backgrounds. Customer types who benefit from the drive-thru include but are not limited to: · Members of the community who have limited time to order food inside the restaurant due to specific and varying circumstances related to their jobs, family status or physical condition, among others. · Residents with children who prefer to order food in the drive-thru because it is quicker than ordering in the restaurant. · Healthcare professionals who work non-typical hours with early morning or late night shifts. · Handicap persons who may not want to leave their vehicles due to limitations of their disabilities The community is supportive of the proposed drive-thru. They are pleased to have an option for a quicker and safer way of ordering food from McDonald’s. This input has been provided to restaurant staff and also quantified by petition signatures. There are about 1,000 signatures collected and 700 of those signatures are from Los Gatos Residents. Please refer to the petition signatures attached in this resubmittal. Findings for Conditional Use Permit Comment Response 1. The proposed use is desirable to the public convenience; and The proposed drive-thru is desirable to the public convenience because it makes ordering food quicker than ordering or dining inside the restaurant. Customers do not have to park their vehicles and walk into the restaurant if they do not intend to dine in. 2. The proposed use would not impair the integrity of the zone; and The proposed drive-thru will not impair the integrity of the zone which already has other similar types of commercial establishments - restaurant and retail businesses. A drive-thru use is already existing Page 3 Click or tap to enter a date. and approved for Jack-In-The-Box, which is located in the same zone, CH – Restricted Commercial Highway. 3. The proposed use would not be detrimental to public health, safety, or general welfare; and The proposed use would not be detrimental to public health, safety, or general welfare because it promotes a healthier, safer and more efficient way of ordering food. Drive-thru allows handicap persons to buy food without leaving their vehicles. Customers do not have to be in an enclosed space with other people while ordering in a drive- thru, reducing the risk of potentially being exposed to viruses like Covid-19 and its variants. 4. The proposed use is in conformance with the Town Code and General Plan. The proposed use is not in conformance with the Town Code and General Plan therefore a variance is being applied for. Findings for Granting A Variance Comment Response 1. Because of special circumstances applicable to the property, including size, shape, topography, location or surroundings, the strict application of this ordinance deprives such property of privileges enjoyed by other properties in the vicinity and under identical zone; and McDonald’s property is situated in a commercial zone, specifically within the CH Zone or Restricted Highway Commercial Zone, which is far from residential uses and is surrounded by similar commercial establishments. McDonald’s is deprived of privileges that other properties in the same zone are enjoying. McDonald’s customers do not have the same access to convenience and safety that Jack-In-The Box offers its customers because the latter has an existing drive- thru. McDonald’s is deprived of serving diverse members of the public who would benefit from ordering food from a drive-thru. Some of these people include handicapped persons who may prefer not to leave their vehicles to order food and parents who would rather grab food on the go than dining inside with their children. 2. The granting of a variance would not constitute a grant of special privileges inconsistent with the limitations upon other Granting of a variance would not constitute a grant of special privileges inconsistent with the limitations upon other business in the same vicinity and zone because Jack-In-The-Box, another restaurant in the same zone (CH-Restricted Commercial Highway) currently has an approved drive-thru. Page 4 Click or tap to enter a date. properties in the vicinity and zone which such property is situated. Response to CDAC Comments Below are responses to relevant comments/questions provided on the minutes of the CDAC hearing help on December 9. 2020. Comment Response Reduce the volume of the outdoor menu speaker The volume of the outdoor menu speaker can be manually adjusted to meet required ambient noise levels. The drive-thru intercom system has an adjustable output to accommodate allowable ambient noise levels per the Town’s Noise Ordinance and Noise Map, as listed below. Refer to 3M’s manufacturer’s letter included in this resubmittal. 48 dBA – 6 am to 1 pm 42 dBA – 1 pm to 10 pm 48 dBA – 10 pm to 6 am Provide screening between business and residential uses to reduce the noise from the outdoor menu speaker. Landscape screening is proposed to reduce the noise from the outdoor menu speaker. Refer to revised site plan showing additional trees on the existing landscape planters. The site is not adjacent to residences. Refer to attached diagram illustrating adjacent uses and distance to nearest residential uses. Need more information on how the use affects traffic. Traffic queueing analysis is attached to provide impacts of the proposed drive-thru to traffic. Per the report, the drive-thru will have the capacity for approximately 8 vehicles, which accommodates the 85th percentile queue length of 7 vehicles, an appropriate queue storage. Due to the large size of the site, any overflow can spill to the drive aisle at the rear of the property. It is Page 5 Click or tap to enter a date. highly unlikely that the vehicle queue will reach Los Gatos Blvd and won’t cause blockage to site entrances. In addition, per the Traffic Impact Analysis provided, the study intersections are projected to operate at an acceptable LOS when proposed project traffic is added to the background conditions. Based on the Town of Los Gatos and Santa Clara County thresholds, there are no deficiencies expected at the study intersections. Thank you for all of your assistance on this project. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (909) 467-8937. Sincerely, Mike Yao Project Manager 909-467-8937 This Page Intentionally Left Blank DN DN EXHIBIT 9 September 15, 2022  Erin Walters, Associate Planner  Town of Los Gatos  110 E Main Street  Los Gatos, CA 95030  Re: 15475 Los Gatos Blvd CUP Modification and Variance Applications (Drive‐Thru)  CEQA Compliance ‐ Categorical Exemption Findings   Dear Erin,  EMC Planning Group has been asked to prepare documentation to assist the Town of  Los Gatos with CEQA compliance for the proposed McDonalds Drive‐Thru.  Project Description The 1.3‐acre project site is located at 15475 Los Gatos Boulevard in the Town of Los  Gatos. The project site is comprised of one parcel, APN 424‐19‐065. The property  includes an existing one‐story McDonalds restaurant with 92 surface parking spaces.  The site has two access points, both from Los Gatos Boulevard. The site is designated as  Mixed‐Use Commercial in the General Plan and zoned Restricted Highway Commercial  (CH). According to the Town’s Code of Ordinances Section 29.10.045, Uses Prohibited, a  drive‐in restaurant (also identified as a drive‐thru restaurant) is prohibited in all zones,  including Restricted Highway Commercial Zone. Therefore, a variance is required.  The proposed project includes the addition of a single, drive‐thru lane to the existing  McDonald’s restaurant with an entrance at the southwest side of the property. New  order and pick‐up windows are proposed on the eastern side of the building with no  altering of the exterior design. The existing ADA parking stalls facing Los Gatos  Boulevard would be reconfigured to fit the new drive‐thru lane and several parking  stalls on the south side of the property are proposed for removal to accommodate the  drive‐thru.   EXHIBIT 10 Erin Walters, Associate Planner  Town of Los Gatos  September 15, 2022, Page 2  The entrance to the drive‐thru would be marked by a gateway sign and clearance bar.  Two ordering windows are proposed in a tandem configuration, one in front of the  other. Each order window would have an order canopy with a built‐in speaker box and  an outdoor digital menu board. Pavement markings, such as arrows and drive‐thru  signs, would be used to help guide the vehicular flow within the property. The  proposed project also includes landscape improvements.  The proposed project does not include any grading or construction.  The project site plan can be found in Attachment A.  Categorical Exemption (CEQA Guidelines Sections 15301, 15303, and 15304) Section 21084 of the California Public Resources Code requires the CEQA Guidelines to  include a list of classes of projects which have been determined not to have a significant  effect on the environment and which shall, therefore, be exempt from the provisions of  CEQA. In response to that mandate, the California Secretary for Resources has found  that the following classes of projects listed in this article do not have a significant effect  on the environment, and they are declared to be categorically exempt from the  requirement for the preparation of environmental documents.  The CEQA Guidelines identifies 33 classes of project types that are categorically exempt.  The proposed project qualifies for three different classes described below:  Class 1 exemption, Existing Facilities, which is defined in the CEQA Guidelines section  15301, as follows:  Class 1 consists of the operation, repair, maintenance, permitting,  leasing, licensing, or minor alteration of existing public or private  structures, facilities, mechanical equipment, or topographical features,  involving negligible or no expansion of existing or former use. The  types of “existing facilities” itemized below are not intended to be all‐ inclusive of the types of projects which might fall within Class 1. The  key consideration is whether the project involves negligible or no  expansion of use.  Class 3 exemption, New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures, which is  defined in the CEQA Guidelines section 15303, as follows:  Erin Walters, Associate Planner  Town of Los Gatos  September 15, 2022, Page 3  Class 3 consists of construction and location of limited numbers of new,  small facilities or structures; installation of small new equipment and  facilities in small structures; and the conversion of existing small  structures from one use to another where only minor modifications are  made in the exterior of the structure. The numbers of structures  described in this section are the maximum allowable on any legal  parcel. Examples of this exemption include, but are not limited to:  a. One single‐family residence, or a second dwelling unit in a  residential zone. In urbanized areas, up to three single‐family  residences may be constructed or converted under this  exemption.  b. A duplex or similar multi‐family residential structure, totaling  no more than four dwelling units. In urbanized areas, this  exemption applies to apartments, duplexes and similar  structures designed for not more than six dwelling units.  c. A store, motel, office, restaurant or similar structure not  involving the use of significant amounts of hazardous  substances, and not exceeding 2500 square feet in floor area. In  urbanized areas, the exemption also applies to up to four such  commercial buildings not exceeding 10,000 square feet in floor  area on sites zoned for such use if not involving the use of  significant amounts of hazardous substances where all  necessary public services and facilities are available and the  surrounding area is not environmentally sensitive.  d. Water main, sewage, electrical, gas, and other utility extensions,  including street improvements, of reasonable length to serve  such construction.  e. Accessory (appurtenant) structures including garages, carports,  patios, swimming pools, and fences.  f. An accessory steam sterilization unit for the treatment of  medical waste at a facility occupied by a medical waste  generator, provided that the unit is installed and operated in  accordance with the Medical Waste Management Act (Section  Erin Walters, Associate Planner  Town of Los Gatos  September 15, 2022, Page 4  117600, et seq., of the Health and Safety Code) and accepts no  offsite waste.  Class 4 exemption, Minor Alterations to Land, which is defined in the CEQA Guidelines  section 15304, as follows:  Class 4 consists of minor public or private alterations in the condition  of land, water, and/or vegetation which do not involve removal of  healthy, mature, scenic trees except for forestry or agricultural  purposes. Examples include, but are not limited to:  a. Grading on land with a slope of less than 10 percent, except that  grading shall not be exempt in a waterway, in any wetland, in  an officially designated (by federal, state, or local government  action) scenic area, or in officially mapped areas of severe  geologic hazard such as an Alquist‐Priolo Earthquake Fault  Zone or within an official Seismic Hazard Zone, as delineated  by the State Geologist.  b. New gardening or landscaping, including the replacement of  existing conventional landscaping with water efficient or fire‐ resistant landscaping.  c. Filling of earth into previously excavated land with material  compatible with the natural features of the site;  d. Minor alterations in land, water, and vegetation on existing  officially designated wildlife management areas or fish  production facilities which result in improvement of habitat for  fish and wildlife resources or greater fish production;  e. Minor temporary use of land having negligible or no  permanent effects on the environment, including carnivals,  sales of Christmas trees, etc.;  f. Minor trenching and backfilling where the surface is restored;  g. Maintenance dredging where the spoil is deposited in a spoil  area authorized by all applicable state and federal regulatory  agencies;  Erin Walters, Associate Planner  Town of Los Gatos  September 15, 2022, Page 5  h. The creation of bicycle lanes on existing rights‐of‐way.  i. Fuel management activities within 30 feet of structures to  reduce the volume of flammable vegetation, provided that the  activities will not result in the taking of endangered, rare, or  threatened plant or animal species or significant erosion and  sedimentation of surface waters. This exemption shall apply to  fuel management activities within 100 feet of a structure if the  public agency having fire protection responsibility for the area  has determined that 100 feet of fuel clearance is required due to  extra hazardous fire conditions.  Exceptions (CEQA Guidelines Section 15300.2) CEQA Guidelines section 15300.2 identifies the following situations where a project  otherwise exempt, would not be due to unusual circumstances.  (a) Location. Classes 3, 4, 5, 6, and 11 are qualified by consideration of  where the project is to be located – a project that is ordinarily  insignificant in its impact on the environment may in a particularly  sensitive environment be significant. Therefore, these classes are  considered to apply all instances, except where the project may impact  on an environmental resource of hazardous or critical concern where  designated, precisely mapped, and officially adopted pursuant to law  by federal, state, or local agencies.  (b) Cumulative Impact. All exemptions for these classes are  inapplicable when the cumulative impact of successive projects of the  same type in the same place, over time is significant.  (c) Significant Effect. A categorical exemption shall not be used for an  activity where there is a reasonable possibility that the activity will  have a significant effect on the environment due to unusual  circumstances.  (d) Scenic Highways. A categorical exemption shall not be used for a  project which may result in damage to scenic resources, including but  not limited to, trees, historic buildings, rock outcroppings, or similar  resources, within a highway officially designated as a state scenic  highway. This does not apply to improvements which are required as  mitigation by an adopted negative declaration or certified EIR.  Erin Walters, Associate Planner  Town of Los Gatos  September 15, 2022, Page 6  (e) Hazardous Waste Sites. A categorical exemption shall not be used  for a project located on a site which is included on any list compiled  pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government Code.  (f) Historical Resources. A categorical exemption shall not be used for  a project which may cause a substantial adverse change in the  significance of a historical resource.  Findings and Evidence We have evaluated the proposed project to determine if it qualifies for the Class 1, 3,  and 4 exemptions, and if so, whether any of the exceptions presented above would  apply. The following findings with evidence are presented.  Class 1, Existing Facilities, Categorical Exemption  Evidence. As identified in the CEQA Guidelines, the key consideration for a project’s  qualification under this exemption is whether the project involves negligible or no  expansion of use. The proposed project includes the addition of a single drive‐thru lane  to the existing McDonald’s restaurant. The drive‐thru consists of new order and pick‐up  windows on the eastern side of the building with no altering of the exterior design. To  accommodate the drive‐thru lane, the existing ADA parking stalls facing Los Gatos  Boulevard would be reconfigured and several parking stalls on the south side of the  property are proposed for removal. The proposed project does not include any grading  or construction.  A traffic impact analysis was conducted for the proposed project, which concluded that  the addition of the drive thru lane could result in a new increase in vehicle trips by 267,  or about 18 percent over existing conditions (Table 6). The traffic impact analysis  concluded that the project would have no significant impact associated with vehicle  miles traveled (VMT). The traffic impact analysis is included as Attachment B.   An environmental noise assessment was also conducted for the proposed project, which  concluded that project‐related noise levels resulting from the proposed addition of  drive‐thru operations at the existing McDonalds restaurant would not be expected to  exceed the Town of Los Gatos noise level standards as long as the 3M Model XT‐1  intercom system noise levels are adjusted to be set at or below 89 dB (at four feet)  between the hours of 6am and 1pm, at or below 93 dB (at four feet) between the hours of  Erin Walters, Associate Planner  Town of Los Gatos  September 15, 2022, Page 7  1pm and 10pm, and at or below 82 dB (at four feet) between the hours of 10pm and 6am  (pages 9 and 10). It is expected that the Town of Los Gatos would require this as a  condition of project approval.  Further, traffic noise exposure along Los Gatos Boulevard would not increase as a result  of the proposed project (Table V). The environmental noise assessment is included as  Attachment C.  The addition of a drive‐thru lane, with minor alterations to the existing McDonald’s  building, reconfiguring a few parking stalls, pavement markings and a gateway sign  and clearance bar, and other minor miscellaneous features accommodating the drive‐ thru use, would be considered a negligible expansion of the existing use of the fast‐food  restaurant, resulting in no significant traffic or noise impacts. Therefore, the proposed  project consists of the minor alteration of an existing structure involving negligible  expansion of the existing use, consistent with the Class 1, Existing Facilities, exemption.   Class 3, New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures, Categorical  Exemption  Evidence. The proposed project includes the addition of a single drive‐thru lane to the  existing McDonald’s restaurant. The drive‐thru consists of new order and pick‐up  windows on the eastern side of the building with no altering of the exterior design. To  accommodate the drive‐thru lane, the existing ADA parking stalls facing Los Gatos  Boulevard would be reconfigured and several parking stalls on the south side of the  property are proposed for removal. Pavement markings, a gateway sign and clearance  bar, and other minor miscellaneous features accommodating the drive‐thru use are also  proposed; however, the proposed project does not include any grading or construction.  Consistent with the example identified in subsection “c” under Class 3, the proposed  project is a restaurant not involving the use of any amount of hazardous substances and  not exceeding 2,500 square feet in floor area. The project does not include an increase in  floor area. The project site is also located within an urbanized area; therefore, the  exemption applies to commercial buildings not exceeding 10,000 square feet in floor area  on sites zoned for such use if not involving the use of significant amounts of hazardous  substances and where all necessary public services and facilities are available and the  surrounding area is not environmentally sensitive. The existing McDonald’s restaurant  is less than 10,000 square feet in floor area; does not involve the use of any amounts of  Erin Walters, Associate Planner  Town of Los Gatos  September 15, 2022, Page 8  hazardous substances; all necessary public services and facilities are available; and the  project site’s surrounding area includes all commercial uses, not environmentally  sensitive areas. The project is also consistent with the example identified in subsection  “e” under Class 3 because its proposed drive‐thru feature can be categorized as an  accessory structure to the existing McDonald’s restaurant.   However, Town Code of Ordinances Section 29.10.045 indicates that a drive‐in  restaurant (also identified as a drive‐thru restaurant) is prohibited in all zones, including  the project site’s Restricted Highway Commercial Zone. Therefore, a variance is  required.   As discussed above under the Class 1 exemption, the proposed project would not result  in significant traffic or noise impacts. Therefore, with an approved variance, the  proposed project could fall under the Class 3 Categorical Exemption.  Class 4, Minor Alterations to Land, Categorical Exemption  Evidence. The proposed project involves minor alterations in the condition of  vegetation. A Tree Inventory, Assessment, and Protection Report (tree report) was prepared  for the proposed project by Monarch Consulting Arborists on April 28, 2021  (Attachment D). The tree report’s inventory contains 46 trees comprised of nine different  species, all located in the parking lot islands around the perimeter of the site (refer to  Appendix A of the tree report for a visual). Of the 46 trees within the inventory, 20 are in  good condition, 22 are in fair condition, one in poor condition, one in very poor  condition, and two coast redwoods are dead. Only the two dead coast redwoods  (identified as tree numbers 489 and 491 in the tree report) are to be removed and  replaced with two coast live oaks, which are water efficient species. The remaining trees  are to remain. The project site’s existing landscaped areas are to remain with some  proposed new trees, shrubs, and groundcover additions that are drought tolerant  species.   Therefore, the proposed project consists of minor alterations in the condition of  vegetation, which do not involve the removal of healthy, mature, or scenic trees and is  consistent with the example identified in subsection “b” under Class 4, the proposed  project includes new landscaping, including the replacement of existing conventional  landscaping with water efficient landscaping.  Erin Walters, Associate Planner  Town of Los Gatos  September 15, 2022, Page 9  Exceptions  (a) Location. Classes 3, 4, 5, 6, and 11 are qualified by consideration of where  the project is to be located – a project that is ordinarily insignificant in its  impact on the environment may in a particularly sensitive environment be  significant. Therefore, these classes are considered to apply all instances,  except where the project may impact on an environmental resource of  hazardous or critical concern where designated, precisely mapped, and  officially adopted pursuant to law by federal, state, or local agencies.  Evidence. The project qualifies for Class 3 and Class 4 exemptions,  which are two of the specified classes of exemptions to which this  exception could apply. However, the project site is located within an  urbanized area of the Town of Los Gatos surrounded by commercial  uses on all sides. The project site is not located in an area where the  project could impact an environmental resource of hazardous or critical  concern where designated, precisely mapping, or officially adopted  pursuant to law by federal, state, or local agencies. Therefore, the  location exception does not apply to the project.  (b) Cumulative Impact. All exemptions for these classes are inapplicable when  the cumulative impact of successive projects of the same type in the same place,  over time is significant.  Evidence. There are no plans for successive projects of the same type  in the Town of Los Gatos. Therefore, there is no cumulative impact of  successive projects of the same type in the same place.  (c) Significant Effect. A categorical exemption shall not be used for an activity  where there is a reasonable possibility that the activity will have a significant  effect on the environment due to unusual circumstances.  Evidence. Case law makes clear that application of this exception must  proceed in two steps. The first is to determine whether a proposed  project involves “unusual circumstances.” If the answer to that  question is in the affirmative, the second step is to consider whether  those unusual circumstances will give rise to potentially significant  environmental effects. (Berkeley Hillside Preservation v. City of Berkeley  (2015) 60 Cal.4th 1086, 1097‐1105 (Berkeley Hillside.) As explained below,  the proposed project does not involve any unusual circumstances with  Erin Walters, Associate Planner  Town of Los Gatos  September 15, 2022, Page 10  respect to its location, size, environmental setting, physical attributes,  surrounding land uses, or planning context – factors considered  relevant under case law. (See Berkeley Hillside, supra, 60 Cal.4th at pp.  1118–1119; San Lorenzo Valley Community Advocates for Responsible  Education v. San Lorenzo Valley Unified School Dist. (2006) 139  Cal.App.4th 1356, 1381; McQueen v. Bd. of Directors (1988) 202  Cal.App.3d 1136, 1149; Lewis v. Seventeenth Dist. Agricultural Assn.  (1985) 165 Cal.App.3d 823, 828–829; City of Pasadena v. State of California  (1993) 14 Cal.App.4th 810, 826–827; Bloom v. McGurk (1994) 26  Cal.App.4th 1307, 1315–1316; and Voices for Rural Living v. El Dorado  Irrigation Dist. (2012) 209 Cal.App.4th 1096, 1109.)   The proposed project (drive‐thru) is consistent with the General Plan  land use designation of Mixed‐Use Commercial. However, the Town’s  Code of Ordinances Section 29.10.045 prohibits drive‐in restaurants in  all zones, including the site’s Restricted Highway Commercial Zone,  and, therefore, the proposed project would require a variance. The  project site is located on a currently developed, highly‐disturbed flat  parcel surrounded by urban development within the Town of Los  Gatos. There is nothing unusual about the project site and nothing  unusual about the proposed project as an addition of a drive‐thru  component to an existing McDonalds fast‐food restaurant. The project  features (pavement markings, gateway signs, clearance bar, etc.) are  typical project features that do not differ from other projects in the  Class 1, 3, and 4 exemptions.   The Town had a traffic impact analysis prepared for the proposed  project by TJW Engineering, Inc. on November 19, 2021 and it  concluded that the project would have no significant vehicle miles  traveled (VMT) impacts. Refer to Attachment B for the full analysis. An  environmental noise assessment was also prepared for the proposed  project and concluded that project‐related noise levels resulting from  the proposed addition of drive‐thru operations at the existing  McDonalds restaurant would not be expected to exceed the Town of  Los Gatos noise level standards as long as the 3M Model XT‐1 intercom  system noise levels are adjusted to be set at or below 89 dB (at four feet)  between the hours of 6am and 1pm, at or below 93 dB (at four feet)  between the hours of 1pm and 10pm, and at or below 82 dB (at four  feet) between the hours of 10pm and 6am (pages 9 and 10). It is  Erin Walters, Associate Planner  Town of Los Gatos  September 15, 2022, Page 11  expected that the Town of Los Gatos would require this as a condition  of project approval (Table V). Further, traffic noise exposure along Los  Gatos Boulevard would not be increased as a result of the proposed  project. Refer to Attachment C for the full assessment.   Therefore, there are no unusual circumstances regarding conditions of  the project site or in the immediate vicinity.  (d) Scenic Highways. A categorical exemption shall not be used for a project  which may result in damage to scenic resources, including but not limited to,  trees, historic buildings, rock outcroppings, or similar resources, within a  highway officially designated as a state scenic highway. This does not apply to  improvements which are required as mitigation by an adopted negative  declaration or certified EIR.  Evidence. The project site is located approximately 1.4 miles northeast  of the nearest eligible state scenic highways, State Routes 9 and 17  (California Department of Transportation 2022). Therefore,  implementation of the proposed project would not substantially  damage scenic resources, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings  within a state scenic highway.  (e) Hazardous Waste Sites. A categorical exemption shall not be used for a  project located on a site which is included on any list compiled pursuant to  Section 65962.5 of the Government Code.  Evidence. The project site is not included on a list of hazardous  materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code section 65962.5  (California Department of Toxic Substances Control 2022) and, as a  result, would not create a significant hazard to the public or the  environment.  (f) Historical Resources. A categorical exemption shall not be used for a project  which may cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical  resource.  Evidence. The proposed project involves minor alterations to an  existing McDonalds fast‐food restaurant. There are no historical  resources located on the project site and the site is located just under  two miles northeast from the Town’s Historic Districts.   Erin Walters, Associate Planner  Town of Los Gatos  September 15, 2022, Page 12  Please contact either of us if you have any questions or comments.   Sincerely,   Teri Wissler Adam      Shoshana Lutz  Senior Principal      Associate Planner  Attachments:  A Project Site Plan  B Traffic Impact Analysis  C Environmental Noise Assessment  D Tree Inventory, Assessment, and Protection Report     Erin Walters, Associate Planner  Town of Los Gatos  September 15, 2022, Page 13  REFERENCES Core States Group. January 17, 2022. Project Plans.   California Department of Transportation (Caltrans). “California State Scenic Highway  System Map.” Accessed April 21, 2022.  https://www.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=465dfd3d807c46cc8e 8057116f1aacaa   California Department of Toxic Substances Control. “EnviroStor Database.”   Accessed April 21, 2022.  https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/map/?myaddress=losgatos  Google Earth. 2022.  WJV Acoustics, Inc. April 18, 2022. Environmental Noise Assessment, McDonalds Drive‐ Thru 15475 Los Gatos Boulevard Los Gatos, California. Visalia, CA.  TJW Engineering, Inc. November 19, 2021. Traffic Impact Analysis – 15475 Los Gatos Road  McDonalds. Irvine, California.   Project Site Plan A ATTACHMENT 1A234567891011 1213BCDEFGHIDOCUMENTS PREPARED BY CORESTATES, INC.,INCLUDING THIS DOCUMENT, ARE TO BE USEDONLY FOR THE SPECIFIC PROJECT AND SPECIFICUSE FOR WHICH THEY WERE INTENDED. ANYEXTENSION OF USE TO ANY OTHER PROJECTS,BY OWNER OR BY ANY OTHER PARTY, WITHOUTTHE EXPRESSED WRITTEN CONSENT OFCORESTATES, INC. IS DONE UNLAWFULLY ANDAT THE USERS OWN RISK. IF USED IN A WAYOTHER THAN THAT SPECIFICALLY INTENDED,USER WILL HOLD CORESTATES, INC. HARMLESSFROM ALL CLAIMS AND LOSSES.Drawing: P:\McDonalds\MRP\Los Gatos, CA (15475 Los Gatos Blvd) 004-0582 -MCD.30686\CIVIL\Drawings\Presentation\MCD-30686-P-SITE.dwg ;Layout1Plot Date/Time: Oct. 14, 21 - 18:23:48User: KCARTERSITE LOCATIONENGINEER SEALDOCUMENTREV DATE COMMENT BYCLIENTCHECKED BY:SHEET NO.JOB #:SCALE:DRAWN BY:DATE:SHEET TITLETHE CONTRACTOR IS SPECIFICALLY CAUTIONED THAT THE LOCATION AND/ORELEVATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES AS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS IS BASED ON DESIGNDRAWINGS, RECORDS OF THE VARIOUS UTILITY COMPANIES, AND WHERE POSSIBLE,MEASUREMENTS TAKEN IN THE FIELD. CORE STATES, INC. DOES NOT GUARANTEETHAT LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE EXACT. THE CONTRACTOR MUST CONTACT THEAPPROPRIATE UTILITY COMPANIES AT LEAST 72 HOURS BEFORE ANY EXCAVATION TOREQUEST EXACT FIELD LOCATIONS OF UTILITIES.DOCUMENTS PREPARED BY CORESTATES, INC.,INCLUDING THIS DOCUMENT, ARE TO BE USEDONLY FOR THE SPECIFIC PROJECT AND SPECIFICUSE FOR WHICH THEY WERE INTENDED. ANYEXTENSION OF USE TO ANY OTHER PROJECTS,BY OWNER OR BY ANY OTHER PARTY, WITHOUTTHE EXPRESSED WRITTEN CONSENT OFCORESTATES, INC. IS DONE UNLAWFULLY ANDAT THE USERS OWN RISK. IF USED IN A WAYOTHER THAN THAT SPECIFICALLY INTENDED,USER WILL HOLD CORESTATES, INC. HARMLESSFROM ALL CLAIMS AND LOSSES.CLIENTTHE CONTRACTOR IS SPECIFICALLY CAUTIONED THAT THE LOCATION AND/ORELEVATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES AS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS IS BASED ON DESIGNDRAWINGS, RECORDS OF THE VARIOUS UTILITY COMPANIES, AND WHERE POSSIBLE,MEASUREMENTS TAKEN IN THE FIELD. CORE STATES, INC. DOES NOT GUARANTEETHAT LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE EXACT. THE CONTRACTOR MUST CONTACT THEAPPROPRIATE UTILITY COMPANIES AT LEAST 72 HOURS BEFORE ANY EXCAVATION TOREQUEST EXACT FIELD LOCATIONS OF UTILITIES.PRELIMINARY SITEPLANSFOR MCDONALDS ATLOS GATOS, CAMCD.3068610/13/2021KCZM15475 LOS GATOSBLVD,LOS GATOS, CA 95032(004-0582)1" = 20'0201020 5GRAPHIC SCALEPRELIMINARYSITE PLANPSP-A1" = 20'SITE LEGENDEXISTING PROPERTY BOUNDARY LINEEXISTING ADJOINING PROPERTY LINEPROPOSED CURBPROPOSED DEPRESSED CURBPROPOSED SIDEWALKPROPOSED CONCRETEPROPOSED PARKING COUNTPROPOSED BUILDINGPROPOSED ASPHALTPROPOSED CURB AND GUTTEREXISTING UTILITY EASEMENTEXISTING EDGE OF PAVEMENTEXISTING WATER STRUCTUREEXISTING SANITARY STRUCTURESWVEXISTING CURB AND GUTTEREXISTING STORMWATER STRUCTURESSPILL GUTTERSPPEXISTING ELECTRIC STRUCTUREGENERAL NOTES:APPLICANT/OWNER:MCDONALD'S CORPORATION2527 CAMINO RAMON ST. 300SAN RAMON, CA 945831) SITE ADDRESS:15475 LOS GATOS ROAD LOS GATOS, CA 95032SANTA CLARA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA2) A.P.N.424-19-0653) ZONING DATA:ZONED: CH - HIGHWAY COMMERCIAL29.60.420EXISTING USE: RESTAURANTPROPOSED USE: RESTAURANT(PERMITTED)REQUIREDEXISTINGPROPOSEDMIN. LOT AREA: N/A 1.334 AC. 1.334 AC N/A (58,125 S.F.) (58,125 S.F.)MIN. LOT FRONTAGE: N/A 195.03' 195.03'MIN. LOT WIDTH: N/A 301.65' 301.65'MIN. FRONT YARD: 15' 99.80' (E) 99.80' (E)MIN. SIDE YARD: 0' 61.01' (S) 61.01' (S) 61.13' (N) 61.13' (N)MIN. REAR YARD: 0' 156.91' (W) 156.91' (W)MAX. IMPERVIOUSSURFACE: N/A 79.56% 78.46%(46,244 S.F.) (46,607 S.F.)MAX. HEIGHT: 35' 16'-1" 16'-1"4) PARKING REQUIREMENTS:29.10.1501 SPACE PER 235 SQUARE FEET OF NET PUBLIC AREA.4,267 S.F. X (1/235) = 19 SPACESREQUIRED = 19 SPACESEXISTING McDONALD'S AREA PARKING: 92 SPACES (INCLUDING 4 ACCESSIBLE SPACES)PROPOSED McDONALD'S AREA PARKING: 77 SPACES (INCLUDING 4 ACCESSIBLE SPACES)PARKING STALL DIMENSIONS:EXISTING: VARIESREQUIRED: 9'X18'PROPOSED: 9'X18'4) ALL EXISTING FEATURES ARE TO REMAIN UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.5) ALL PAVEMENT MARKINGS SHALL BE LONG LIFE EPOXY.6) PRIOR TO STARTING CONSTRUCTION, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE TO MAKE SURETHAT ALL REQUIRED PERMITS AND APPROVALS HAVE BEEN OBTAINED. NO CONSTRUCTION ORFABRICATION SHALL BEGIN UNTIL THE CONTRACTOR HAS RECEIVED AND THOROUGHLYREVIEWED ALL PLANS AND OTHER DOCUMENTS BY ALL OF THE PERMITTING AUTHORITIES.7) ALL WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THESE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONSAND THE REQUIREMENTS AND STANDARDS OF THE LOCAL GOVERNING AUTHORITY.8) ALL DIMENSIONS SHOWN ON THE PLANS SHALL BE FIELD VERIFIED BY THE CONTRACTOR PRIORTO CONSTRUCTION. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY ENGINEER IF ANY DISCREPANCIES EXISTPRIOR TO PROCEEDING WITH CONSTRUCTION FOR NECESSARY PLAN CHANGES. NO EXTRA COMPENSATION SHALL BE PAID TO THE CONTRACTOR FOR WORK HAVING TO BE REDONE DUE TODIMENSIONS OR GRADES SHOWN INCORRECTLY ON THESE PLANS IF SUCH NOTIFICATION HASNOT BEEN GIVEN.9) SOLID WASTE TO BE DISPOSED OF BY CONTRACTOR IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL LOCAL, STATEAND FEDERAL REGULATIONS.10) ALL EXCAVATED UNSUITABLE MATERIAL MUST BE TRANSPORTED TO AN APPROVED DISPOSALLOCATION.11) CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL SHORING REQUIRED DURING EXCAVATION AND SHALL BEPERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH CURRENT OSHA STANDARDS, AS WELL AS ADDITIONALPROVISIONS TO ASSURE STABILITY OF CONTIGUOUS STRUCTURES, AS FIELD CONDITIONSDICTATE.SIGN LEGEND:PROPOSED SPRINGBOARD CANOPY.PROPOSED DIGITAL PRE-BROWSE MENU BOARD.PROPOSED WELCOME POINT GATEWAY.PROPOSED OUTDOOR DIGITAL MENU BOARD (ODMB).*VERIFY SIGNAGE WITH SIGN ORDER REQUEST FORM.*VERIFY LOCATIONS WITH McDONALD'S REPRESENTATIVE.1234SITE KEY NOTES:A. PROPOSED LANDSCAPE AREA.B. PROPOSED CONCRETE CURB.C. PROPOSED ACCESSIBLE PARKING STRIPING. MUST BE LONG LIFE EPOXY.D. PROPOSED PARKING STRIPING (TYP.). MUST BE LONG LIFE EPOXY.E. PROPOSED CROSSWALK STRIPING.F. PROPOSED ACCESSIBLE CURB RAMP WITH 3' DEEP DETECTABLE WARNING.G. PROPOSED CONCRETE SIDEWALK.H. DETECTOR LOOP(S) TO BE INSTALLED / REPLACED AT EXISTING DRIVE THRU WINDOWS AS DIRECTED BY MCDONALD’SCONSTRUCTION MANAGER.I. PROPOSED GUARDRAIL.J. PROPOSED YELLOW DRIVE-THRU DIRECTION PAVEMENT MARKINGS.K. PROPOSED YELLOW PAINTED "DRIVE THRU" PAVEMENT MARKINGS.L. PROPOSED 6" WIDE YELLOW PAINTED STRIPE.M. PROPOSED YELLOW PAINTED "THANK YOU" PAVEMENT PARKING.N. PROPOSED DIRECTIONAL SITE ARROWS.O. PROPOSED ADA PARKING SIGN AND POST.P. PROPOSED WHEEL STOP.Q. PROPOSED LOT LIGHT. Traffic Impact Analysis B ATTACHMENT 9841 Irvine Center Dr, Suite 200 | Irvine, California 92618 | 949.878.3509 |www.tjwengineering.com November 19, 2021 Mr. Mike Yao CORE STATES GROUP 4240 East Jurupa Street, Suite 402 Ontario, CA 91761 Subject: Traffic Impact Analysis - 15475 Los Gatos Road McDonalds Dear Mr. Yao: TJW ENGINEERING, INC. (TJW) is pleased to submit this traffic impact analysis for the proposed circulation and drive-through configuration changes at the McDonalds restaurant at 15475 Los Gatos Road in the Town of Los Gatos. This traffic study has been prepared to meet the traffic study requirements for the Town of Los Gatos and assesses the forecast traffic operations associated with the proposed project and its impact on the local street network. This report is being submitted to you for review and forwarded to the Town of Los Gatos. Please contact us at (949) 878-3509 if you have any questions regarding this analysis. Sincerely, Thomas Wheat, PE, TE David Chew, PTP President Transportation Planner Registered Civil Engineer #69467 Registered Traffic Engineer #2565 Jeffrey Chinchilla, PE Project Engineer 15475 Los Gatos Road McDonalds Traffic Impact Analysis CSG-21-001 2 Table of Contents Introduction.......................................................................................................................................................3 Project Description........................................................................................................................................3 Study Area .....................................................................................................................................................3 Intersection Analysis Methodology...............................................................................................................7 Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) Analysis..........................................................................................................8 Performance Criteria .....................................................................................................................................9 Existing Conditions.............................................................................................................................................9 Existing Traffic Volumes.................................................................................................................................9 Existing Conditions Intersection Level of Service Analysis.............................................................................9 Background Conditions (Existing + Approved Projects)...................................................................................12 Background Conditions Volumes.................................................................................................................12 Background Conditions Intersection Level of Service Analysis....................................................................12 Background plus Project Conditions................................................................................................................16 Background plus Project Conditions Volumes.............................................................................................16 Background plus Project Conditions Intersection Level of Service Analysis................................................17 Conclusion .......................................................................................................................................................17 Lis of Tables Table 1 HCM – LOS & Delay Ranges – Signalized Intersections.........................................................................7 Table 2 HCM – LOS & Delay Ranges – Unsignalized Intersections.....................................................................8 Table 3 Intersection Analysis – Existing Conditions.........................................................................................12 Table 4 Cumulative Projects List......................................................................................................................14 Table 5 Intersection Analysis – Background Conditions..................................................................................16 Table 6 Proposed Project Trip Generation ......................................................................................................16 Table 7 Intersection Analysis –Background plus Project Conditions...............................................................17 List of Exhibits Exhibit 1: Project Location.................................................................................................................................4 Exhibit 2: Proposed Project Site Plan.................................................................................................................5 Exhibit 3: Proposed TIA Study Area...................................................................................................................6 Exhibit 4: Lane Geometry and Intersection Controls.......................................................................................10 Exhibit 5: Existing AM/PM Peak Hour Volumes...............................................................................................11 Exhibit 6: Cumulative Projects Map.................................................................................................................13 Exhibit 7: Background Conditions AM/PM Peak Hour Volumes......................................................................15 Exhibit 8: Trip Distribution and Background plus Project Conditions AM/PM Peak Hour Volumes................18 15475 Los Gatos Road McDonalds Traffic Impact Analysis CSG-21-001 3 Introduction This traffic impact analysis (TIA) analyzes the projected traffic operations associated with the proposed circulation and drive-through configuration changes at the McDonalds restaurant at 15475 Los Gatos Road in the Town of Los Gatos. The purpose of this TIA is to evaluate potential circulation system deficiencies that may result from the changes to the existing site and to recommend improvements to achieve acceptable operations, if applicable. This analysis has been prepared in coordination with the Town of Los Gatos via a scoping agreement (see Appendix) and is pursuant to applicable Town of Los Gatos and County of Santa Clara traffic impact analysis guidelines. Project Description The proposed project changes the configuration of the existing McDonalds restaurant to include a new drive- thru lane and window. Exhibit 1 shows the project location. Exhibit 2 shows the proposed project site plan. Study Area In addition to project driveways, the following intersection in the vicinity of the project site have been included in the intersection level of service (LOS) analysis: 1. Los Gatos Blvd/Los Gatos Village Center Driveway. This traffic analysis follows the Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority Congestion Management Program Transportation Impact Analysis Guidelines. Exhibit 3 shows the location of the study intersections which are analyzed for the following study scenarios: Existing Conditions Background Conditions (Existing + Approved Projects) Background Conditions Plus Project (Existing + Approved Projects + Project) Traffic operations are evaluated for the following time periods: Weekday AM Peak Hour occurring within 7:00 AM to 9:00 AM; and Weekday PM Peak Hour occurring within 4:00 PM to 6:00 PM. Not to ScaleExhibit 1: Project Location15475 Los Gatos Blvd McDonald'sTraffic Impact AnalysisCSG-21-0014Legend:Project LocationLo s G a t o s B l v dLark AveLos Gatos A lmaden Rd Not to ScaleExhibit 2: Proposed Project Site Plan15475 Los Gatos Blvd McDonald'sTraffic Impact AnalysisCSG-21-0015 Not to ScaleExhibit 3: Proposed TIA Study Area15475 Los Gatos Blvd McDonald'sTraffic Impact AnalysisCSG-21-001Legend:Project Site1Study Intersection LocationLOS GATOS BLVDLOS GATOSVILLAGE CENTER6 15475 Los Gatos Road McDonalds Traffic Impact Analysis CSG-21-001 7 Intersection Analysis Methodology Level of Service (LOS) is commonly used to describe the quality of flow on roadways and at intersections using a range of LOS from LOS A (free flow with little congestion) to LOS F (severely congested conditions). The definitions for LOS for interruption of traffic flow differ depending on the type of traffic control (traffic signal, unsignalized intersection with side street stops, unsignalized intersection with all-way stops). The Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) 6 (Transportation Research Board, 2016) methodology expresses the LOS of an intersection in terms of delay time for the intersection approaches. The HCM methodology utilizes different procedures for different types of intersection control. Table 1 describes the general characteristics of traffic flow and accompanying delay ranges at signalized intersections. Table 1 HCM – LOS & Delay Ranges – Signalized Intersections Level of Service Description Delay (in seconds) A Very favorable progression; most vehicles arrive during green signal and do not stop. Short cycle lengths.0 – 10.00 B Good progression, short cycle lengths. More vehicles stop than for LOS A.10.01 – 20.00 C Fair progression; longer cycle lengths. Individual cycle failures may begin to appear. The number of vehicles stopping is significant, though many vehicles still pass through without stopping. 20.01 – 35.00 D Progression less favorable, longer cycle length and high flow/capacity ratio. The proportion of vehicles that pass through without stopping diminishes. Individual cycle failures are obvious. 35.01 – 55.00 E Severe congestion with some long-standing queues on critical approaches. Poor progression, long cycle lengths and high flow/capacity ratio. Individual cycle failures are frequent. 55.01 – 80.00 F Very poor progression, long cycle lengths and many individual cycle failures. Arrival flow rates exceed capacity of intersection.> 80.01 Source: Transportation Research Board, Highway Capacity Manual, HCM6 Edition (Washington D.C., 2016). The Town of Los Gatos traffic impact study guidelines require signalized intersection operations be analyzed utilizing the HCM 6th Edition methodology. Intersection LOS for signalized intersections is based on the intersections average control delay for all movements at the intersection during the peak hour. Control delay includes initial deceleration delay, queue move-up time, stopped delay, and final acceleration delay. Collected peak hour traffic volumes have been adjusted using a peak hour factor (PHF) to reflect peak 15- minute volumes. It is a common practice in LOS analysis to conservatively use a peak 15-minute flow rate applied to the entire hour to derive flow rates in vehicles per hour that are used in the LOS analysis. The PHF is the relationship between the peak 15-minute flow rate and the full hourly volume. PHF = [Hourly Volume]/ 15475 Los Gatos Road McDonalds Traffic Impact Analysis CSG-21-001 8 [4 * Peak 15-Minute Volume]. The use of a 15-minute PHF produces a more detailed and conservative analysis compared to analyzing vehicles per hour. Existing PHFs, obtained from the existing traffic counts have been used for all analysis scenarios in this study. The Town of Los Gatos traffic study guidelines also require unsignalized intersection operations be analyzed utilizing the HCM 6th Edition methodology. Intersection operation for unsignalized intersections is based on the weighted average control delay expressed in seconds per vehicle. At a two-way or side-street stop-controlled intersection, LOS is calculated for each stop-controlled minor street movement, for the left-turn movement(s) from the major street, and for the intersection as a whole. For approaches consisting of a single lane, the delay is calculated as the average of all movements in that lane. For all-way stop-controlled intersection, LOS is computed for the intersection as a whole. Table 2 describes the general characteristics of traffic flow and accompanying delay ranges at unsignalized intersections. Table 2 HCM – LOS & Delay Ranges – Unsignalized Intersections Level of Service Description Delay (in seconds) A Little or no delays.0 – 10.00 B Short traffic delays.10.01 – 15.00 C Average traffic delays.15.01 – 25.00 D Long traffic delays. Multiple vehicles in queue.25.01 – 35.00 E Very long delays. Demand approaching capacity of intersection 35.01 – 50.00 F Very constrained flow with extreme delays and intersection capacity exceeded.> 50.01 Source: Transportation Research Board, Highway Capacity Manual, HCM6 Edition (Washington D.C., 2016). This analysis utilizes PTV Vistro 2022 analysis software for all signalized and unsignalized intersections. Vistro is a macroscopic traffic software program that is based on the signalized intersection capacity analysis specified in Chapter 16 of the HCM. The level of service and capacity analysis performed within Vistro takes the optimization and coordination of signalized intersections within a network into consideration. Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) Analysis Senate Bill (SB) 743 was adopted in 2013 requiring the Governor’s Office of Planning and Research (OPR) to identify new metrics for identifying and mitigating transportation impacts within the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). For land use projects, OPR has identified Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) as the new metric for transportation analysis under CEQA. The regulatory changes to the CEQA guidelines that implement SB 743 were approved on December 28th, 2018 with an implementation date of July 1st, 2020 as the new metric. 15475 Los Gatos Road McDonalds Traffic Impact Analysis CSG-21-001 9 Consistent with the new metric of VMT for analysis of transportation impacts under CEQA, this analysis follows the VMT guidelines set forth by the Town of Los Gatos. Based on VMT guidelines, local serving retail projects are considered to have no significant VMT impacts. Since the proposed project can be considered to be local serving retail, the proposed project is projected to have no significant VMT impacts. Performance Criteria The Town of Los Gatos requires traffic impact analysis reports be consistent with the TIA guidelines adopted by the Santa Clara County Transportation Authority (VTA) Congestion Management Program (CMP). The CMP level of service standard is LOS E. If a development is projected to cause LOS at an intersection to fall from LOS E or better to LOS F under project conditions, the project is expected to cause a deficiency at the intersection. Existing Conditions Exhibit 4 shows existing conditions and roadway geometry at study area intersections. Existing Traffic Volumes To determine the existing operation of the study intersections, AM and PM peak period traffic counts were collected on Tuesday, October, 12 2021. Exhibit 5 shows existing AM and PM peak hour volumes at the study intersections. Existing Conditions Intersection Level of Service Analysis Existing conditions AM and PM peak hour intersection analysis is shown in Table 3. Calculations are based on the existing geometrics at the study area intersections as shown in Exhibit 4. HCM analysis sheets are provided in the Appendix. As shown in Table 3, the study intersections are currently operating at an acceptable LOS during the AM and PM peak hours for existing conditions. Not to ScaleExhibit 4: Lane Geometry and Intersection Controls15475 Los Gatos Blvd McDonald'sTraffic Impact AnalysisCSG-21-001Legend:Project Site1Study Intersection LocationLOS G A T O S B L V D LOS GATOSVILLAGE CENTER10 Not to ScaleExhibit 5: Existing AM/PM Peak Hour Volumes15475 Los Gatos Blvd McDonald'sTraffic Impact AnalysisCSG-21-001Legend:Project SiteStudy Intersection Location111LOS G A T O S B L V D LOS GATOSVILLAGE CENTERPM PEAK HOURAM PEAK HOUR23 15475 Los Gatos Road McDonalds Traffic Impact Analysis CSG-21-001 12 Table 3 Intersection Analysis – Existing Conditions Existing ConditionsIntersectionControl Type Peak Hour Delay1 LOS AM 6.8 A1Los Gatos Los Gatos Village Sq Signal PM 12.4 B AM 13.4 B2Los Gatos Dwy 1 OWSC PM 16.6 C AM 13.0 B3Los Gatos Dwy 2 OWSC PM 15.5 C Note: TWSC = Two-Way Stop-Control, OWSC = One-Way Stop-Control; Delay shown in seconds per vehicle. 1 = Per the Highway Capacity Manual 6th Edition, overall average delay and LOS are shown for signalized intersections. Background Conditions (Existing + Approved Projects) Background Conditions traffic analysis is intended to identify baseline conditions in the near-term including cumulative project. Background Conditions Volumes Background conditions volumes include existing and recently approved projects in the vicinity of the proposed project. Coordination with the Town of Los Gatos was conducted to determine approved projects within the surrounding area. Exhibit 6 shows the location of nearby cumulative developments. A summary of cumulative projects land uses is shown in Table 4. Exhibit 7 shows background conditions AM and PM peak hour volumes at the study intersections. Background Conditions Intersection Level of Service Analysis Background conditions AM and PM peak hour intersection analysis is shown in Table 5. HCM analysis sheets are provided in the Appendix. As shown in Table 5, the study intersections are projected to continue to operate at an acceptable LOS during the AM and PM peak hours for background conditions. Not to ScaleExhibit 6: Cumulative Projects Map15475 Los Gatos Blvd McDonald'sTraffic Impact AnalysisCSG-21-00113Legend:Approximate Cumulative Project LocationsProject SiteX1234567Los G a t o s Blossom HillLarkS a n t a C r u zSaratoga Los GatosCA- 1 7 15475 Los Gatos Road McDonalds Traffic Impact Analysis CSG-21-001 14 Table 4 Cumulative Projects List AM Peak Hour PM Peak HourTAZProjectLand Use Qty Units In Out Total In Out Total Daily 400 Blossom Hill Rd Assisted Living 114.00 Beds 12 8 21 11 17 27 296 Strip Retail (<40k TSF)7.05 TSF 10 7 17 23 23 46 384116212 Los Gatos Blvd Small Office 4.27 TSF 6 1 7 3 6 9 61 Subtotal 28 16 45 37 46 82 741 405 Alberto Way General Office 155.00 DU 207 28 236 38 185 223 1,6802110 Wood Road Senior Housing Multi 174.00 DU 12 23 35 24 19 44 564 Subtotal 207 28 236 38 185 223 1,680 Strip Retail (<40k TSF)6.10 TSF 9 6 14 20 20 40 33214926 Los Gatos Blvd Muli-Family (Low Rise)5.00 DU 0 2 2 2 1 3 34 105 Newell Ave Single Family Detached 4.00 DU 1 2 3 2 1 4 38 North 40 Specific Plan Multi-Use --422 263 685 690 836 1,526 15,757 3 Subtotal 432 273 705 714 858 1,573 16,161 Total 639 301 941 752 1,043 1,796 17,841 1: DU = Dwelling Units, TSF = Thousand Square Feet; 2: Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers, Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition, 2017 (unless otherwise noted) Not to ScaleExhibit 7: Background CondiƟons AM/PM Peak Hour Volumes15475 Los Gatos Blvd McDonald'sTraffic Impact AnalysisCSG-21-00115Legend:Project SiteStudy Intersection LocationPM PEAK HOURAM PEAK HOUR123 15475 Los Gatos Road McDonalds Traffic Impact Analysis CSG-21-001 16 Table 5 Intersection Analysis – Background Conditions Background ConditionsIntersectionControl Type Peak Hour Delay1 LOS AM 6.6 A1Los Gatos Los Gatos Village Sq Signal PM 12.0 B AM 14.1 B2Los Gatos Dwy 1 OWSC PM 19.7 C AM 13.6 B3Los Gatos Dwy 2 OWSC PM 18.0 C Note: TWSC = Two-Way Stop-Control, OWSC = One-Way Stop-Control; Delay shown in seconds per vehicle. 1 = Per the Highway Capacity Manual 6th Edition, overall average delay and LOS are shown for signalized intersections. Background plus Project Conditions Background plus project traffic conditions analysis is intended to identify baseline conditions in the near- term with the proposed project. Background plus Project Conditions Volumes Background plus project conditions include existing, recently approved projects, and proposed project volumes. Proposed project volumes are based on the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual (10th Edition, 2017) and are shown in Table 6. After appropriate pass-by trip reductions, the project is expected to generate 267 new daily trips, 32 new AM peak hour trips, and 10 new PM peak hour trips. Table 6 Proposed Project Trip Generation 1: Rates from ITE Trip Generation Manual (10th Edition, 2017), Pass-By Rates from ITE Trip Generation Handbook (3rd Edition) 2: TSF = Thousand Square Feet 15475 Los Gatos Road McDonalds Traffic Impact Analysis CSG-21-001 17 Based on the potential interaction between the proposed land use and surrounding regional access routes, projected trip distribution for the proposed project is shown in Exhibit 8. Exhibit 8 shows background conditions AM and PM peak hour volumes at the study intersections. Background plus Project Conditions Intersection Level of Service Analysis Background plus project conditions AM and PM peak hour intersection analysis is shown in Table 7. HCM analysis sheets are provided in the Appendix. As shown in Table 7, the study intersections are projected to continue to operate at an acceptable LOS during the AM and PM peak hours for background plus projects conditions. Table 7 Intersection Analysis –Background plus Project Conditions Background Conditions Background + Project ConditionsIntersectionControl Type Peak Hour Delay1 LOS Delay1 LOS Change Deficient? AM 6.6 A 6.7 A 0.1 No1Los Gatos Los Gatos Village Sq Signal PM 12.0 B 12.1 B 0.1 No AM 14.1 B 14.9 B 0.8 No2Los Gatos Dwy 1 OWSC PM 19.7 C 20.0 C 0.3 No AM 13.6 B 13.8 B 0.2 No3Los Gatos Dwy 2 OWSC PM 18.0 C 18.0 C 0.0 No Note: TWSC = Two-Way Stop-Control, OWSC = One-Way Stop-Control; Delay shown in seconds per vehicle. 1 = Per the Highway Capacity Manual 6th Edition, overall average delay and LOS are shown for signalized intersections Conclusion As previously shown in Table 7 the study intersections are projected to operate at an acceptable LOS when proposed project traffic is added to background conditions. Based on Town of Los Gatos and Santa Clara County thresholds, there are no deficiencies expected at the study intersections. Not to ScaleExhibit 8: Trip Distribution and Background plus Project Conditions AM/PM Peak hour Volumes15475 Los Gatos Blvd McDonald'sTraffic Impact AnalysisCSG-21-001Legend:XX%Project SitePercent Trip DistributionStudy Intersection Location181LOS G A T O S B L V D LOS GATOSVILLAGE CENTER50%50%PM PEAK HOURAM PEAK HOUR APPENDIX SCOPING AGREEMENT 15475 Los Gatos Blvd McDonald’s Scoping Agreement CSG-21-001 1 Scoping Agreement for Traffic Impact Analysis This form acknowledges the requirements for the traffic impact analysis of the following project. The analysis will follow the local jurisdiction’s traffic impact analysis guidelines. Project Name: Los Gatos Road McDonald’s Project Address: 15475 Los Gatos Blvd, Los Gatos, CA Project Description: Addition of Drive-Thru Lane to Existing McDonald’s Restaurant See attached site plan exhibit Consultant Developer Name: TJW Engineering Core States Group Address: 9841 Irvine Center Dr, Suite 200 4240 East Jurupa St, Suite 402 Irvine, CA Ontario, CA 91761 Telephone: 949-878-3509 909-467-8937 Email: Jeffrey@tjwengineering.com myao@core-states.com Trip Generation Source: ITE Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition (2017) Current GP Land Use: Commercial Proposed Land Use: Commercial Current Zoning: CH-Highway Commercial Proposed Zoning: CH-Highway Commercial Is the project screened from LOS analysis? Yes X No Justification: Is the project screened from VMT analysis? X Yes No Justification: The project can be considered to be local serving retail. Local serving retail projects are considered to have no significant VMT impacts. 15475 Los Gatos Blvd McDonald’s Scoping Agreement CSG-21-001 2 Existing Trip Generation Proposed Trip Generation In Out Total In Out Total AM Trips See attached trip generation table PM Trips Daily Internal Trip Capture: Yes X No N/A % Trip Discount Pass-By Allowance: X Yes No 50 % Trip Discount Trip Distribution: See attached exhibit Study Intersections: 1. Los Gatos Blvd/Los Gatos Village Center Dwy 6. 2. 7. 3. 8. 4. 9. 5. 10. Analysis Scenarios: 1. Existing Conditions 6. 2. Background Conditions (EX + Approved Projects) 7. 3. Background Plus Project Conditions (EX + Approved Projects + Project) 8. 4. 9. 5. 10. Additional Notes: TJW Engineering requests a list of recently approved projects within the vicinity of the proposed project. These projects will be included in the Background Conditions scenarios. Signatures: (Jeffrey Chinchilla) Consultant’s Representative Town of Los Gatos (Approved By) 09/23/2021 Date Date Not to ScaleExhibit 1: Project Site Plan15475 Los Gatos Blvd McDonald'sTraffic Impact AnalysisCSG-21-001 In Out TotalIn Out TotalExisting Restaurant (No Drive-Thru) (ITE 933)4.27 TSF 346.23 1,477 25.10 60:40 65 43 108 28.34 50:50 60 61 121Existing Restaurant (With Drive-Thru) (ITE 934)4.27 TSF 470.95 2,011 40.19 51:49 88 84 172 32.67 52:48 73 67 140Increase in Trips53423 41 6413 6 19Pass-By Discount-267-11 -21 -32-6 -3 -9Net Increase in Trips26711 21 327 3 101: Rates from ITE Trip Generation (10th Edition, 2017)2: TSF = Thousand Square FeetVolumeUnit2Pass By %50%Proposed Project Trip Generation Table 1RateIn:Out SplitVolumeLand Use1QtyDaily Trips (ADTs) AM Peak HourPM Peak HourRateVolume RateIn:Out SplitNExhibit 2: Study Area and Trip Distribution15475 Los Gatos Blvd McDonald'sTraffic Impact AnalysisCSG-21-001 Not to ScaleExhibit 2: Study Area and Trip Distribution15475 Los Gatos Blvd McDonald'sTraffic Impact AnalysisCSG-21-001Legend:XX%Project SitePercent Trip Distribution50%1Study Intersection Location50%LOS GATOS BLVDLOS GATOSVILLAGE CENTER EXISTING TRAFFIC COUNTS File Name : 01_LGS_Los Gatos_LGVS AM Site Code : 99921567 Start Date : 10/12/2021 Page No : 1 City of Los Gatos N/S: Los Gatos Boulevard E/W: Los Gatos Village Square Driveway Weather: Clear Groups Printed- Total Volume Los Gatos Boulevard Southbound Los Gatos Village Square Driveway Westbound Los Gatos Boulevard Northbound Dead End Eastbound Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total 07:00 AM 8 98 0 106 0 0 0 0 5 98 1 104 0 0 0 0 210 07:15 AM 15 115 0 130 0 0 0 0 5 115 1 121 0 0 0 0 251 07:30 AM 15 187 0 202 0 0 0 0 6 135 0 141 0 0 0 0 343 07:45 AM 35 281 0 316 0 0 0 0 3 183 0 186 0 0 0 0 502 Total 73 681 0 754 0 0 0 0 19 531 2 552 0 0 0 0 1306 08:00 AM 12 213 0 225 1 0 0 1 11 274 2 287 0 0 0 0 513 08:15 AM 23 222 0 245 4 0 1 5 18 268 5 291 0 0 0 0 541 08:30 AM 34 217 0 251 1 0 1 2 7 218 6 231 0 0 0 0 484 08:45 AM 33 218 0 251 2 0 1 3 11 186 6 203 0 0 0 0 457 Total 102 870 0 972 8 0 3 11 47 946 19 1012 0 0 0 0 1995 Grand Total 175 1551 0 1726 8 0 3 11 66 1477 21 1564 0 0 0 0 3301 Apprch %10.1 89.9 0 72.7 0 27.3 4.2 94.4 1.3 0 0 0 Total %5.3 47 0 52.3 0.2 0 0.1 0.3 2 44.7 0.6 47.4 0 0 0 0 Los Gatos Boulevard Southbound Los Gatos Village Square Driveway Westbound Los Gatos Boulevard Northbound Dead End Eastbound Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 08:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:45 AM 07:45 AM 35 281 0 316 0 0 0 0 3 183 0 186 0 0 0 0 502 08:00 AM 12 213 0 225 1 0 0 1 11 274 2 287 0 0 0 0 513 08:15 AM 23 222 0 245 4 0 1 5 18 268 5 291 0 0 0 0 541 08:30 AM 34 217 0 251 1 0 1 2 7 218 6 231 0 0 0 0 484 Total Volume 104 933 0 1037 6 0 2 8 39 943 13 995 0 0 0 0 2040 % App. Total 10 90 0 75 0 25 3.9 94.8 1.3 0 0 0 PHF .743 .830 .000 .820 .375 .000 .500 .400 .542 .860 .542 .855 .000 .000 .000 .000 .943 Counts Unlimited, Inc. PO Box 1178 Corona, CA 92878 (951) 268-6268 counts@countsunlimited.com File Name : 01_LGS_Los Gatos_LGVS AM Site Code : 99921567 Start Date : 10/12/2021 Page No : 2 City of Los Gatos N/S: Los Gatos Boulevard E/W: Los Gatos Village Square Driveway Weather: Clear Los Gatos Boulevard Dead End Los Gatos Village Square Driveway Los Gatos Boulevard Right 0 Thru 933 Left 104 InOut Total 945 1037 1982 Right2 Thru0 Left6 OutTotalIn117 8 125 Left 39 Thru 943 Right 13 Out TotalIn 939 995 1934 Left0 Thru0 Right0 TotalOutIn39 0 39 Peak Hour Begins at 07:45 AM Total Volume Peak Hour Data North Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 08:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Each Approach Begins at: 07:45 AM 08:00 AM 08:00 AM 07:00 AM +0 mins.35 281 0 316 1 0 0 1 11 274 2 287 0 0 0 0 +15 mins.12 213 0 225 4 0 1 5 18 268 5 291 0 0 0 0 +30 mins.23 222 0 245 1 0 1 2 7 218 6 231 0 0 0 0 +45 mins.34 217 0 251 2 0 1 3 11 186 6 203 0 0 0 0 Total Volume 104 933 0 1037 8 0 3 11 47 946 19 1012 0 0 0 0 % App. Total 10 90 0 72.7 0 27.3 4.6 93.5 1.9 0 0 0 PHF .743 .830 .000 .820 .500 .000 .750 .550 .653 .863 .792 .869 .000 .000 .000 .000 Counts Unlimited, Inc. PO Box 1178 Corona, CA 92878 (951) 268-6268 counts@countsunlimited.com File Name : 01_LGS_Los Gatos_LGVS PM Site Code : 99921567 Start Date : 10/12/2021 Page No : 1 City of Los Gatos N/S: Los Gatos Boulevard E/W: Los Gatos Village Square Driveway Weather: Clear Groups Printed- Total Volume Los Gatos Boulevard Southbound Los Gatos Village Square Driveway Westbound Los Gatos Boulevard Northbound Dead End Eastbound Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total 04:00 PM 45 303 0 348 28 0 12 40 6 257 31 294 0 0 0 0 682 04:15 PM 38 266 0 304 29 0 8 37 14 223 25 262 0 0 0 0 603 04:30 PM 43 268 0 311 24 0 6 30 6 216 29 251 0 0 0 0 592 04:45 PM 44 281 0 325 30 0 8 38 17 250 30 297 0 0 0 0 660 Total 170 1118 0 1288 111 0 34 145 43 946 115 1104 0 0 0 0 2537 05:00 PM 43 290 0 333 26 0 6 32 5 253 18 276 0 0 0 0 641 05:15 PM 36 259 0 295 27 0 7 34 9 222 22 253 0 0 0 0 582 05:30 PM 34 280 0 314 20 0 7 27 4 234 27 265 0 0 0 0 606 05:45 PM 42 248 0 290 24 0 6 30 7 172 19 198 0 0 0 0 518 Total 155 1077 0 1232 97 0 26 123 25 881 86 992 0 0 0 0 2347 Grand Total 325 2195 0 2520 208 0 60 268 68 1827 201 2096 0 0 0 0 4884 Apprch %12.9 87.1 0 77.6 0 22.4 3.2 87.2 9.6 0 0 0 Total %6.7 44.9 0 51.6 4.3 0 1.2 5.5 1.4 37.4 4.1 42.9 0 0 0 0 Los Gatos Boulevard Southbound Los Gatos Village Square Driveway Westbound Los Gatos Boulevard Northbound Dead End Eastbound Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 04:00 PM 04:00 PM 45 303 0 348 28 0 12 40 6 257 31 294 0 0 0 0 682 04:15 PM 38 266 0 304 29 0 8 37 14 223 25 262 0 0 0 0 603 04:30 PM 43 268 0 311 24 0 6 30 6 216 29 251 0 0 0 0 592 04:45 PM 44 281 0 325 30 0 8 38 17 250 30 297 0 0 0 0 660 Total Volume 170 1118 0 1288 111 0 34 145 43 946 115 1104 0 0 0 0 2537 % App. Total 13.2 86.8 0 76.6 0 23.4 3.9 85.7 10.4 0 0 0 PHF .944 .922 .000 .925 .925 .000 .708 .906 .632 .920 .927 .929 .000 .000 .000 .000 .930 Counts Unlimited, Inc. PO Box 1178 Corona, CA 92878 (951) 268-6268 counts@countsunlimited.com File Name : 01_LGS_Los Gatos_LGVS PM Site Code : 99921567 Start Date : 10/12/2021 Page No : 2 City of Los Gatos N/S: Los Gatos Boulevard E/W: Los Gatos Village Square Driveway Weather: Clear Los Gatos Boulevard Dead End Los Gatos Village Square Driveway Los Gatos Boulevard Right 0 Thru 1118 Left 170 InOut Total 980 1288 2268 Right34 Thru0 Left111 OutTotalIn285 145 430 Left 43 Thru 946 Right 115 Out TotalIn 1229 1104 2333 Left0 Thru0 Right0 TotalOutIn43 0 43 Peak Hour Begins at 04:00 PM Total Volume Peak Hour Data North Peak Hour Analysis From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Each Approach Begins at: 04:00 PM 04:00 PM 04:00 PM 04:00 PM +0 mins.45 303 0 348 28 0 12 40 6 257 31 294 0 0 0 0 +15 mins.38 266 0 304 29 0 8 37 14 223 25 262 0 0 0 0 +30 mins.43 268 0 311 24 0 6 30 6 216 29 251 0 0 0 0 +45 mins.44 281 0 325 30 0 8 38 17 250 30 297 0 0 0 0 Total Volume 170 1118 0 1288 111 0 34 145 43 946 115 1104 0 0 0 0 % App. Total 13.2 86.8 0 76.6 0 23.4 3.9 85.7 10.4 0 0 0 PHF .944 .922 .000 .925 .925 .000 .708 .906 .632 .920 .927 .929 .000 .000 .000 .000 Counts Unlimited, Inc. PO Box 1178 Corona, CA 92878 (951) 268-6268 counts@countsunlimited.com HCM ANALYSIS SHEETS Existing Conditions 0.274Volume to Capacity (v/c): ALevel Of Service: 6.8Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM 6th EditionAnalysis Method: SignalizedControl Type: Intersection 1: Los Gatos/Los Gatos Village Sq Intersection Level Of Service Report YesYesYesCrosswalk NoNoNoCurb Present 0.000.000.00Grade [%] 25.0035.0035.00Speed [mph] 0.000.000.000.000.000.000.00Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0000000No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 100.00100.00100.00225.00200.00100.00225.00Entry Pocket Length [ft] 1001101No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightLeftThruLeftRightThruU-turnTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Los Gatos Village SqLos GatosLos GatosName Intersection Setup TJW Engineering, Inc1 11/18/2021 Los Gatos Blvd McDonalds Scenario 1: 1 Existing AMVersion 2022 (SP 0-0) Generated with 000Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 000v_ab, Corner Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 000v_ci, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing mi 000v_co, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 000v_di, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing m 000v_do, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 0000000Local Bus Stopping Rate [/h] 0000000On-Street Parking Maneuver Rate [/h] NoNoNoNoNoNoPresence of On-Street Parking 269331041394339Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 1223326323610Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Peak Hour Factor 269331041394339Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 0000000Right Turn on Red Volume [veh/h] 0000000Other Volume [veh/h] 0000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 0000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Growth Factor 2.002.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 269331041394339Base Volume Input [veh/h] Los Gatos Village SqLos GatosLos GatosName Volumes TJW Engineering, Inc2 11/18/2021 Los Gatos Blvd McDonalds Scenario 1: 1 Existing AMVersion 2022 (SP 0-0) Generated with 0Pedestrian Clearance [s] 0Pedestrian Walk [s] 0Pedestrian Signal Group Exclusive Pedestrian Phase 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor 0.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Detector Length [ft] 0.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Detector Location [ft] NoNoNoNoNoPedestrian Recall NoNoNoNoNoMaximum Recall NoNoNoNoNoMinimum Recall 0.02.03.13.10.03.13.1l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 0.02.02.02.00.02.02.0l1, Start-Up Lost Time [s] NoNoNoRest In Walk 0.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Delayed Vehicle Green [s] 0171000140Pedestrian Clearance [s] 0550050Walk [s] 0.03.03.03.00.03.03.0Vehicle Extension [s] 026263802638Split [s] 0.01.01.01.00.01.01.0All red [s] 0.03.04.14.10.04.14.1Amber [s] 030303003030Maximum Green [s] 051050105Minimum Green [s] -Lead-Lead--LeadLead / Lag Auxiliary Signal Groups 0725061Signal Group PermissivePermissivePermissiveProtectedPermissivePermissiveProtectedControl Type Phasing & Timing 0.00Lost time [s] SingleBandPermissive Mode Lead Green - Beginning of First GreenOffset Reference 0.0Offset [s] Fully actuatedActuation Type Time of Day Pattern CoordinatedCoordination Type 90Cycle Length [s] -Signal Coordination Group YesLocated in CBD Intersection Settings TJW Engineering, Inc3 11/18/2021 Los Gatos Blvd McDonalds Scenario 1: 1 Existing AMVersion 2022 (SP 0-0) Generated with 2.678.2937.42115.652.1458.9847.2395th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 0.110.331.504.630.092.361.8995th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 1.484.6120.7964.251.1932.7626.2450th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 0.060.180.832.570.051.311.0550th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] NoYesNoYesNoYesNoCritical Lane Group DDADAAELane Group LOS 47.4054.322.5450.432.893.7856.03d, Delay for Lane Group [s/veh] 0.120.330.260.790.010.270.68X, volume / capacity Lane Group Results 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.00PF, progression factor 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Rp, platoon ratio 0.000.000.000.000.000.000.00d3, Initial Queue Delay [s] 3.3310.140.179.890.020.2013.13d2, Incremental Delay [s] 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor 0.110.110.500.110.500.500.11k, delay calibration 44.0744.182.3740.542.873.5842.90d1, Uniform Delay [s] 161836451321071343257c, Capacity [veh/h] 1431160345841603143145841603s, saturation flow rate [veh/h] 0.000.000.200.060.010.210.02(v / s)_i Volume / Saturation Flow Rate 0.010.010.800.080.750.750.04g / C, Green / Cycle 1172767673g_i, Effective Green Time [s] 2.002.003.103.103.103.103.10l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 0.000.000.000.000.000.000.00l1_p, Permitted Start-Up Lost Time [s] 4.004.005.105.105.105.105.10L, Total Lost Time per Cycle [s] 90909090909090C, Cycle Length [s] RCCLRCLLane Group Lane Group Calculations TJW Engineering, Inc4 11/18/2021 Los Gatos Blvd McDonalds Scenario 1: 1 Existing AMVersion 2022 (SP 0-0) Generated with Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh]56.03 3.78 2.89 50.43 2.54 54.32 47.40 Movement LOS E A A D A D D d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh]5.82 7.35 52.59 Approach LOS A A D d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh]6.78 Intersection LOS A Intersection V/C 0.274 Other Modes g_Walk,mi, Effective Walk Time [s]9.0 9.0 9.0 M_corner, Corner Circulation Area [ft²/ped]0.00 0.00 0.00 M_CW, Crosswalk Circulation Area [ft²/ped]0.00 0.00 0.00 d_p, Pedestrian Delay [s]36.46 36.46 36.46 I_p,int, Pedestrian LOS Score for Intersection 3.002 2.918 1.976 Crosswalk LOS C C A s_b, Saturation Flow Rate of the bicycle lane 2000 2000 2000 c_b, Capacity of the bicycle lane [bicycles/h]464 464 489 d_b, Bicycle Delay [s]26.54 26.54 25.70 I_b,int, Bicycle LOS Score for Intersection 2.107 2.130 1.573 Bicycle LOS B B A ----------------Ring 4 ----------------Ring 3 -------------765Ring 2 --------------21Ring 1 Sequence TJW Engineering, Inc5 11/18/2021 Los Gatos Blvd McDonalds Scenario 1: 1 Existing AMVersion 2022 (SP 0-0) Generated with 0.071Volume to Capacity (v/c): BLevel Of Service: 13.4Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM 6th EditionAnalysis Method: Two-way stopControl Type: Intersection 2: Los Gatos/Dwy 1 Intersection Level Of Service Report YesNoNoCrosswalk 0.000.000.00Grade [%] 25.0035.0035.00Speed [mph] 0.000.000.000.000.000.00Exit Pocket Length [ft] 000000No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 100.00100.0050.00100.00100.00100.00Entry Pocket Length [ft] 001000No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightLeftRightThruThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration EastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Dwy 1Los GatosLos GatosName Intersection Setup 000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 330399399560Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 80102352390Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Peak Hour Factor 330399399560Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Growth Factor 2.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 330399399560Base Volume Input [veh/h] Dwy 1Los GatosLos GatosName Volumes TJW Engineering, Inc6 11/18/2021 Los Gatos Blvd McDonalds Scenario 1: 1 Existing AMVersion 2022 (SP 0-0) Generated with BIntersection LOS 0.22d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] BAAApproach LOS 13.390.000.00d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 5.740.000.000.000.000.0095th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 0.230.000.000.000.000.0095th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] BAAAMovement LOS 13.390.000.000.000.000.00d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 0.070.000.000.010.010.00V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results 000Number of Storage Spaces in Median NoTwo-Stage Gap Acceptance 000Storage Area [veh] Flared Lane StopFreeFreePriority Scheme Intersection Settings TJW Engineering, Inc7 11/18/2021 Los Gatos Blvd McDonalds Scenario 1: 1 Existing AMVersion 2022 (SP 0-0) Generated with 0.022Volume to Capacity (v/c): BLevel Of Service: 13.0Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM 6th EditionAnalysis Method: Two-way stopControl Type: Intersection 3: Los Gatos/Dwy 2 Intersection Level Of Service Report YesNoNoCrosswalk 0.000.000.00Grade [%] 25.0035.0035.00Speed [mph] 0.000.000.000.000.000.00Exit Pocket Length [ft] 000000No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 100.00100.0050.00100.00100.00100.00Entry Pocket Length [ft] 001000No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightLeftRightThruThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration EastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Dwy 2Los GatosLos GatosName Intersection Setup 000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 100269399560Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 3072352390Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Peak Hour Factor 100269399560Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Growth Factor 2.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 100269399560Base Volume Input [veh/h] Dwy 2Los GatosLos GatosName Volumes TJW Engineering, Inc8 11/18/2021 Los Gatos Blvd McDonalds Scenario 1: 1 Existing AMVersion 2022 (SP 0-0) Generated with BIntersection LOS 0.07d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] BAAApproach LOS 12.960.000.00d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 1.660.000.000.000.000.0095th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 0.070.000.000.000.000.0095th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] BAAAMovement LOS 12.960.000.000.000.000.00d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 0.020.000.000.010.010.00V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results 000Number of Storage Spaces in Median NoTwo-Stage Gap Acceptance 000Storage Area [veh] Flared Lane StopFreeFreePriority Scheme Intersection Settings TJW Engineering, Inc9 11/18/2021 Los Gatos Blvd McDonalds Scenario 1: 1 Existing AMVersion 2022 (SP 0-0) Generated with 0.382Volume to Capacity (v/c): BLevel Of Service: 12.4Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM 6th EditionAnalysis Method: SignalizedControl Type: Intersection 1: Los Gatos/Los Gatos Village Sq Intersection Level Of Service Report YesYesYesCrosswalk NoNoNoCurb Present 0.000.000.00Grade [%] 25.0035.0035.00Speed [mph] 0.000.000.000.000.000.000.00Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0000000No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 100.00100.00100.00225.00200.00100.00225.00Entry Pocket Length [ft] 1001101No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightLeftThruLeftRightThruU-turnTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Los Gatos Village SqLos GatosLos GatosName Intersection Setup TJW Engineering, Inc1 11/12/2021 Los Gatos Blvd McDonalds Scenario 2: 2 Existing PMVersion 2022 (SP 0-0) Generated with 000Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 000v_ab, Corner Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 000v_ci, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing mi 000v_co, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 000v_di, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing m 000v_do, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 0000000Local Bus Stopping Rate [/h] 0000000On-Street Parking Maneuver Rate [/h] NoNoNoNoNoNoPresence of On-Street Parking 34111111817011594643Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 928280432923711Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Peak Hour Factor 34111111817011594643Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 0000000Right Turn on Red Volume [veh/h] 0000000Other Volume [veh/h] 0000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 0000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Growth Factor 2.002.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 34111111817011594643Base Volume Input [veh/h] Los Gatos Village SqLos GatosLos GatosName Volumes TJW Engineering, Inc2 11/12/2021 Los Gatos Blvd McDonalds Scenario 2: 2 Existing PMVersion 2022 (SP 0-0) Generated with 0Pedestrian Clearance [s] 0Pedestrian Walk [s] 0Pedestrian Signal Group Exclusive Pedestrian Phase 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor 0.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Detector Length [ft] 0.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Detector Location [ft] NoNoNoNoNoPedestrian Recall NoNoNoNoNoMaximum Recall NoNoNoNoNoMinimum Recall 0.02.03.13.10.03.13.1l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 0.02.02.02.00.02.02.0l1, Start-Up Lost Time [s] NoNoNoRest In Walk 0.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Delayed Vehicle Green [s] 0171000140Pedestrian Clearance [s] 0550050Walk [s] 0.03.03.03.00.03.03.0Vehicle Extension [s] 026393103325Split [s] 0.01.01.01.00.01.01.0All red [s] 0.03.04.14.10.04.14.1Amber [s] 030303003030Maximum Green [s] 051050105Minimum Green [s] -Lead-Lead--LeadLead / Lag Auxiliary Signal Groups 0725061Signal Group PermissivePermissivePermissiveProtectedPermissivePermissiveProtectedControl Type Phasing & Timing 0.00Lost time [s] SingleBandPermissive Mode Lead Green - Beginning of First GreenOffset Reference 0.0Offset [s] Fully actuatedActuation Type Time of Day Pattern CoordinatedCoordination Type 90Cycle Length [s] -Signal Coordination Group YesLocated in CBD Intersection Settings TJW Engineering, Inc3 11/12/2021 Los Gatos Blvd McDonalds Scenario 2: 2 Existing PMVersion 2022 (SP 0-0) Generated with 33.19122.2493.25181.4638.71116.1252.4095th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 1.334.893.737.261.554.642.1095th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 18.4467.9151.80100.8121.5064.5129.1150th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 0.742.722.074.030.862.581.1650th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] NoYesNoYesNoYesNoCritical Lane Group DDADAAELane Group LOS 39.1747.915.1746.667.248.3556.97d, Delay for Lane Group [s/veh] 0.260.760.340.830.130.330.71X, volume / capacity Lane Group Results 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.00PF, progression factor 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Rp, platoon ratio 0.000.000.000.000.000.000.00d3, Initial Queue Delay [s] 1.057.930.298.340.300.3114.13d2, Incremental Delay [s] 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor 0.110.110.500.110.500.500.11k, delay calibration 38.1239.984.8938.326.948.0442.84d1, Uniform Delay [s] 1301463271205892285961c, Capacity [veh/h] 1431160345841603143145841603s, saturation flow rate [veh/h] 0.020.070.240.110.080.210.03(v / s)_i Volume / Saturation Flow Rate 0.090.090.710.130.620.620.04g / C, Green / Cycle 88641156563g_i, Effective Green Time [s] 2.002.003.103.103.103.103.10l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 0.000.000.000.000.000.000.00l1_p, Permitted Start-Up Lost Time [s] 4.004.005.105.105.105.105.10L, Total Lost Time per Cycle [s] 90909090909090C, Cycle Length [s] RCCLRCLLane Group Lane Group Calculations TJW Engineering, Inc4 11/12/2021 Los Gatos Blvd McDonalds Scenario 2: 2 Existing PMVersion 2022 (SP 0-0) Generated with Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh]56.97 8.35 7.24 46.66 5.17 47.91 39.17 Movement LOS E A A D A D D d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh]10.13 10.65 45.86 Approach LOS B B D d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh]12.43 Intersection LOS B Intersection V/C 0.382 Other Modes g_Walk,mi, Effective Walk Time [s]9.0 9.0 9.0 M_corner, Corner Circulation Area [ft²/ped]0.00 0.00 0.00 M_CW, Crosswalk Circulation Area [ft²/ped]0.00 0.00 0.00 d_p, Pedestrian Delay [s]36.46 36.46 36.46 I_p,int, Pedestrian LOS Score for Intersection 3.059 2.964 2.058 Crosswalk LOS C C B s_b, Saturation Flow Rate of the bicycle lane 2000 2000 2000 c_b, Capacity of the bicycle lane [bicycles/h]620 753 489 d_b, Bicycle Delay [s]21.44 17.50 25.70 I_b,int, Bicycle LOS Score for Intersection 2.167 2.268 1.799 Bicycle LOS B B A ----------------Ring 4 ----------------Ring 3 -------------765Ring 2 --------------21Ring 1 Sequence TJW Engineering, Inc5 11/12/2021 Los Gatos Blvd McDonalds Scenario 2: 2 Existing PMVersion 2022 (SP 0-0) Generated with 0.132Volume to Capacity (v/c): CLevel Of Service: 16.6Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM 6th EditionAnalysis Method: Two-way stopControl Type: Intersection 2: Los Gatos/Dwy 1 Intersection Level Of Service Report YesNoNoCrosswalk 0.000.000.00Grade [%] 25.0035.0035.00Speed [mph] 0.000.000.000.000.000.00Exit Pocket Length [ft] 000000No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 100.00100.0050.00100.00100.00100.00Entry Pocket Length [ft] 001000No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightLeftRightThruThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration EastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Dwy 1Los GatosLos GatosName Intersection Setup 000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 47036128810610Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 12093222650Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Peak Hour Factor 47036128810610Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Growth Factor 2.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 47036128810610Base Volume Input [veh/h] Dwy 1Los GatosLos GatosName Volumes TJW Engineering, Inc6 11/12/2021 Los Gatos Blvd McDonalds Scenario 2: 2 Existing PMVersion 2022 (SP 0-0) Generated with CIntersection LOS 0.32d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] CAAApproach LOS 16.640.000.00d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 11.270.000.000.000.000.0095th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 0.450.000.000.000.000.0095th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] CAAAMovement LOS 16.640.000.000.000.000.00d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 0.130.000.000.010.010.00V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results 000Number of Storage Spaces in Median NoTwo-Stage Gap Acceptance 000Storage Area [veh] Flared Lane StopFreeFreePriority Scheme Intersection Settings TJW Engineering, Inc7 11/12/2021 Los Gatos Blvd McDonalds Scenario 2: 2 Existing PMVersion 2022 (SP 0-0) Generated with 0.039Volume to Capacity (v/c): CLevel Of Service: 15.5Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM 6th EditionAnalysis Method: Two-way stopControl Type: Intersection 3: Los Gatos/Dwy 2 Intersection Level Of Service Report YesNoNoCrosswalk 0.000.000.00Grade [%] 25.0035.0035.00Speed [mph] 0.000.000.000.000.000.00Exit Pocket Length [ft] 000000No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 100.00100.0050.00100.00100.00100.00Entry Pocket Length [ft] 001000No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightLeftRightThruThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration EastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Dwy 2Los GatosLos GatosName Intersection Setup 000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 14024128810610Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 4063222650Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Peak Hour Factor 14024128810610Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Growth Factor 2.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 14024128810610Base Volume Input [veh/h] Dwy 2Los GatosLos GatosName Volumes TJW Engineering, Inc8 11/12/2021 Los Gatos Blvd McDonalds Scenario 2: 2 Existing PMVersion 2022 (SP 0-0) Generated with CIntersection LOS 0.09d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] CAAApproach LOS 15.520.000.00d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 3.060.000.000.000.000.0095th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 0.120.000.000.000.000.0095th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] CAAAMovement LOS 15.520.000.000.000.000.00d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 0.040.000.000.010.010.00V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results 000Number of Storage Spaces in Median NoTwo-Stage Gap Acceptance 000Storage Area [veh] Flared Lane StopFreeFreePriority Scheme Intersection Settings TJW Engineering, Inc9 11/12/2021 Los Gatos Blvd McDonalds Scenario 2: 2 Existing PMVersion 2022 (SP 0-0) Generated with Background Conditions 0.300Volume to Capacity (v/c): ALevel Of Service: 6.6Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM 6th EditionAnalysis Method: SignalizedControl Type: Intersection 1: Los Gatos/Los Gatos Village Sq Intersection Level Of Service Report YesYesYesCrosswalk NoNoNoCurb Present 0.000.000.00Grade [%] 25.0035.0035.00Speed [mph] 0.000.000.000.000.000.000.00Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0000000No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 100.00100.00100.00225.00200.00100.00225.00Entry Pocket Length [ft] 1001101No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightLeftThruLeftRightThruU-turnTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Los Gatos Village SqLos GatosLos GatosName Intersection Setup TJW Engineering, Inc1 11/12/2021 Los Gatos Blvd McDonalds Scenario 3: 3 Existing Background AMVersion 2022 (SP 0-0) Generated with 000Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 000v_ab, Corner Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 000v_ci, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing mi 000v_co, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 000v_di, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing m 000v_do, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 0000000Local Bus Stopping Rate [/h] 0000000On-Street Parking Maneuver Rate [/h] NoNoNoNoNoNoPresence of On-Street Parking 26103210413106239Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 1225826326610Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Peak Hour Factor 26103210413106239Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 0000000Right Turn on Red Volume [veh/h] 0000000Other Volume [veh/h] 0000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0099001190Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 0000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Growth Factor 2.002.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 269331041394339Base Volume Input [veh/h] Los Gatos Village SqLos GatosLos GatosName Volumes TJW Engineering, Inc2 11/12/2021 Los Gatos Blvd McDonalds Scenario 3: 3 Existing Background AMVersion 2022 (SP 0-0) Generated with 0Pedestrian Clearance [s] 0Pedestrian Walk [s] 0Pedestrian Signal Group Exclusive Pedestrian Phase 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor 0.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Detector Length [ft] 0.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Detector Location [ft] NoNoNoNoNoPedestrian Recall NoNoNoNoNoMaximum Recall NoNoNoNoNoMinimum Recall 0.02.03.13.10.03.13.1l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 0.02.02.02.00.02.02.0l1, Start-Up Lost Time [s] NoNoNoRest In Walk 0.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Delayed Vehicle Green [s] 0171000140Pedestrian Clearance [s] 0550050Walk [s] 0.03.03.03.00.03.03.0Vehicle Extension [s] 026263802638Split [s] 0.01.01.01.00.01.01.0All red [s] 0.03.04.14.10.04.14.1Amber [s] 030303003030Maximum Green [s] 051050105Minimum Green [s] -Lead-Lead--LeadLead / Lag Auxiliary Signal Groups 0725061Signal Group PermissivePermissivePermissiveProtectedPermissivePermissiveProtectedControl Type Phasing & Timing 0.00Lost time [s] SingleBandPermissive Mode Lead Green - Beginning of First GreenOffset Reference 0.0Offset [s] Fully actuatedActuation Type Time of Day Pattern CoordinatedCoordination Type 90Cycle Length [s] -Signal Coordination Group YesLocated in CBD Intersection Settings TJW Engineering, Inc3 11/12/2021 Los Gatos Blvd McDonalds Scenario 3: 3 Existing Background AMVersion 2022 (SP 0-0) Generated with 2.678.2942.57115.652.1468.7147.2395th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 0.110.331.704.630.092.751.8995th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 1.484.6123.6564.251.1938.1726.2450th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 0.060.180.952.570.051.531.0550th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] NoYesNoYesNoYesNoCritical Lane Group DDADAAELane Group LOS 47.4054.322.6350.432.893.9456.03d, Delay for Lane Group [s/veh] 0.120.330.280.790.010.310.68X, volume / capacity Lane Group Results 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.00PF, progression factor 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Rp, platoon ratio 0.000.000.000.000.000.000.00d3, Initial Queue Delay [s] 3.3310.140.199.890.020.2313.13d2, Incremental Delay [s] 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor 0.110.110.500.110.500.500.11k, delay calibration 44.0744.182.4440.542.873.7142.90d1, Uniform Delay [s] 161836451321071343257c, Capacity [veh/h] 1431160345841603143145841603s, saturation flow rate [veh/h] 0.000.000.230.060.010.230.02(v / s)_i Volume / Saturation Flow Rate 0.010.010.800.080.750.750.04g / C, Green / Cycle 1172767673g_i, Effective Green Time [s] 2.002.003.103.103.103.103.10l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 0.000.000.000.000.000.000.00l1_p, Permitted Start-Up Lost Time [s] 4.004.005.105.105.105.105.10L, Total Lost Time per Cycle [s] 90909090909090C, Cycle Length [s] RCCLRCLLane Group Lane Group Calculations TJW Engineering, Inc4 11/12/2021 Los Gatos Blvd McDonalds Scenario 3: 3 Existing Background AMVersion 2022 (SP 0-0) Generated with Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh]56.03 3.94 2.89 50.43 2.63 54.32 47.40 Movement LOS E A A D A D D d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh]5.75 7.01 52.59 Approach LOS A A D d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh]6.55 Intersection LOS A Intersection V/C 0.300 Other Modes g_Walk,mi, Effective Walk Time [s]9.0 9.0 9.0 M_corner, Corner Circulation Area [ft²/ped]0.00 0.00 0.00 M_CW, Crosswalk Circulation Area [ft²/ped]0.00 0.00 0.00 d_p, Pedestrian Delay [s]36.46 36.46 36.46 I_p,int, Pedestrian LOS Score for Intersection 3.033 2.953 1.976 Crosswalk LOS C C A s_b, Saturation Flow Rate of the bicycle lane 2000 2000 2000 c_b, Capacity of the bicycle lane [bicycles/h]464 464 489 d_b, Bicycle Delay [s]26.54 26.54 25.70 I_b,int, Bicycle LOS Score for Intersection 2.172 2.184 1.573 Bicycle LOS B B A ----------------Ring 4 ----------------Ring 3 -------------765Ring 2 --------------21Ring 1 Sequence TJW Engineering, Inc5 11/12/2021 Los Gatos Blvd McDonalds Scenario 3: 3 Existing Background AMVersion 2022 (SP 0-0) Generated with 0.077Volume to Capacity (v/c): BLevel Of Service: 14.1Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM 6th EditionAnalysis Method: Two-way stopControl Type: Intersection 2: Los Gatos/Dwy 1 Intersection Level Of Service Report YesNoNoCrosswalk 0.000.000.00Grade [%] 25.0035.0035.00Speed [mph] 0.000.000.000.000.000.00Exit Pocket Length [ft] 000000No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 100.00100.0050.00100.00100.00100.00Entry Pocket Length [ft] 001000No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightLeftRightThruThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration EastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Dwy 1Los GatosLos GatosName Intersection Setup 000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 33039103810750Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 80102602690Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Peak Hour Factor 33039103810750Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 000991190Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Growth Factor 2.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 330399399560Base Volume Input [veh/h] Dwy 1Los GatosLos GatosName Volumes TJW Engineering, Inc6 11/12/2021 Los Gatos Blvd McDonalds Scenario 3: 3 Existing Background AMVersion 2022 (SP 0-0) Generated with BIntersection LOS 0.21d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] BAAApproach LOS 14.080.000.00d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 6.210.000.000.000.000.0095th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 0.250.000.000.000.000.0095th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] BAAAMovement LOS 14.080.000.000.000.000.00d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 0.080.000.000.010.010.00V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results 000Number of Storage Spaces in Median NoTwo-Stage Gap Acceptance 000Storage Area [veh] Flared Lane StopFreeFreePriority Scheme Intersection Settings TJW Engineering, Inc7 11/12/2021 Los Gatos Blvd McDonalds Scenario 3: 3 Existing Background AMVersion 2022 (SP 0-0) Generated with 0.023Volume to Capacity (v/c): BLevel Of Service: 13.6Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM 6th EditionAnalysis Method: Two-way stopControl Type: Intersection 3: Los Gatos/Dwy 2 Intersection Level Of Service Report YesNoNoCrosswalk 0.000.000.00Grade [%] 25.0035.0035.00Speed [mph] 0.000.000.000.000.000.00Exit Pocket Length [ft] 000000No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 100.00100.0050.00100.00100.00100.00Entry Pocket Length [ft] 001000No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightLeftRightThruThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration EastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Dwy 2Los GatosLos GatosName Intersection Setup 000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 10026103810750Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 3072602690Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Peak Hour Factor 10026103810750Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 000991190Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Growth Factor 2.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 100269399560Base Volume Input [veh/h] Dwy 2Los GatosLos GatosName Volumes TJW Engineering, Inc8 11/12/2021 Los Gatos Blvd McDonalds Scenario 3: 3 Existing Background AMVersion 2022 (SP 0-0) Generated with BIntersection LOS 0.06d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] BAAApproach LOS 13.580.000.00d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 1.790.000.000.000.000.0095th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 0.070.000.000.000.000.0095th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] BAAAMovement LOS 13.580.000.000.000.000.00d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 0.020.000.000.010.010.00V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results 000Number of Storage Spaces in Median NoTwo-Stage Gap Acceptance 000Storage Area [veh] Flared Lane StopFreeFreePriority Scheme Intersection Settings TJW Engineering, Inc9 11/12/2021 Los Gatos Blvd McDonalds Scenario 3: 3 Existing Background AMVersion 2022 (SP 0-0) Generated with 0.434Volume to Capacity (v/c): BLevel Of Service: 12.0Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM 6th EditionAnalysis Method: SignalizedControl Type: Intersection 1: Los Gatos/Los Gatos Village Sq Intersection Level Of Service Report YesYesYesCrosswalk NoNoNoCurb Present 0.000.000.00Grade [%] 25.0035.0035.00Speed [mph] 0.000.000.000.000.000.000.00Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0000000No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 100.00100.00100.00225.00200.00100.00225.00Entry Pocket Length [ft] 1001101No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightLeftThruLeftRightThruU-turnTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Los Gatos Village SqLos GatosLos GatosName Intersection Setup TJW Engineering, Inc1 11/12/2021 Los Gatos Blvd McDonalds Scenario 4: 4 Existing Background PMVersion 2022 (SP 0-0) Generated with 000Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 000v_ab, Corner Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 000v_ci, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing mi 000v_co, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 000v_di, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing m 000v_do, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 0000000Local Bus Stopping Rate [/h] 0000000On-Street Parking Maneuver Rate [/h] NoNoNoNoNoNoPresence of On-Street Parking 341111382170115118443Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 928346432929611Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Peak Hour Factor 341111382170115118443Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 0000000Right Turn on Red Volume [veh/h] 0000000Other Volume [veh/h] 0000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 00264002380Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 0000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Growth Factor 2.002.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 34111111817011594643Base Volume Input [veh/h] Los Gatos Village SqLos GatosLos GatosName Volumes TJW Engineering, Inc2 11/12/2021 Los Gatos Blvd McDonalds Scenario 4: 4 Existing Background PMVersion 2022 (SP 0-0) Generated with 0Pedestrian Clearance [s] 0Pedestrian Walk [s] 0Pedestrian Signal Group Exclusive Pedestrian Phase 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor 0.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Detector Length [ft] 0.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Detector Location [ft] NoNoNoNoNoPedestrian Recall NoNoNoNoNoMaximum Recall NoNoNoNoNoMinimum Recall 0.02.03.13.10.03.13.1l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 0.02.02.02.00.02.02.0l1, Start-Up Lost Time [s] NoNoNoRest In Walk 0.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Delayed Vehicle Green [s] 0171000140Pedestrian Clearance [s] 0550050Walk [s] 0.03.03.03.00.03.03.0Vehicle Extension [s] 026393103325Split [s] 0.01.01.01.00.01.01.0All red [s] 0.03.04.14.10.04.14.1Amber [s] 030303003030Maximum Green [s] 051050105Minimum Green [s] -Lead-Lead--LeadLead / Lag Auxiliary Signal Groups 0725061Signal Group PermissivePermissivePermissiveProtectedPermissivePermissiveProtectedControl Type Phasing & Timing 0.00Lost time [s] SingleBandPermissive Mode Lead Green - Beginning of First GreenOffset Reference 0.0Offset [s] Fully actuatedActuation Type Time of Day Pattern CoordinatedCoordination Type 90Cycle Length [s] -Signal Coordination Group YesLocated in CBD Intersection Settings TJW Engineering, Inc3 11/12/2021 Los Gatos Blvd McDonalds Scenario 4: 4 Existing Background PMVersion 2022 (SP 0-0) Generated with 33.19122.24125.04181.4638.71155.8452.4095th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 1.334.895.007.261.556.232.1095th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 18.4467.9169.47100.8121.5086.5829.1150th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 0.742.722.784.030.863.461.1650th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] NoYesNoYesNoYesNoCritical Lane Group DDADAAELane Group LOS 39.1747.915.6946.667.249.0556.97d, Delay for Lane Group [s/veh] 0.260.760.420.830.130.410.71X, volume / capacity Lane Group Results 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.00PF, progression factor 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Rp, platoon ratio 0.000.000.000.000.000.000.00d3, Initial Queue Delay [s] 1.057.930.408.340.300.4414.13d2, Incremental Delay [s] 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor 0.110.110.500.110.500.500.11k, delay calibration 38.1239.985.2938.326.948.6042.84d1, Uniform Delay [s] 1301463271205892285961c, Capacity [veh/h] 1431160345841603143145841603s, saturation flow rate [veh/h] 0.020.070.300.110.080.260.03(v / s)_i Volume / Saturation Flow Rate 0.090.090.710.130.620.620.04g / C, Green / Cycle 88641156563g_i, Effective Green Time [s] 2.002.003.103.103.103.103.10l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 0.000.000.000.000.000.000.00l1_p, Permitted Start-Up Lost Time [s] 4.004.005.105.105.105.105.10L, Total Lost Time per Cycle [s] 90909090909090C, Cycle Length [s] RCCLRCLLane Group Lane Group Calculations TJW Engineering, Inc4 11/12/2021 Los Gatos Blvd McDonalds Scenario 4: 4 Existing Background PMVersion 2022 (SP 0-0) Generated with Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh]56.97 9.05 7.24 46.66 5.69 47.91 39.17 Movement LOS E A A D A D D d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh]10.43 10.18 45.86 Approach LOS B B D d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh]11.99 Intersection LOS B Intersection V/C 0.434 Other Modes g_Walk,mi, Effective Walk Time [s]9.0 9.0 9.0 M_corner, Corner Circulation Area [ft²/ped]0.00 0.00 0.00 M_CW, Crosswalk Circulation Area [ft²/ped]0.00 0.00 0.00 d_p, Pedestrian Delay [s]36.46 36.46 36.46 I_p,int, Pedestrian LOS Score for Intersection 3.130 3.046 2.058 Crosswalk LOS C C B s_b, Saturation Flow Rate of the bicycle lane 2000 2000 2000 c_b, Capacity of the bicycle lane [bicycles/h]620 753 489 d_b, Bicycle Delay [s]21.44 17.50 25.70 I_b,int, Bicycle LOS Score for Intersection 2.298 2.413 1.799 Bicycle LOS B B A ----------------Ring 4 ----------------Ring 3 -------------765Ring 2 --------------21Ring 1 Sequence TJW Engineering, Inc5 11/12/2021 Los Gatos Blvd McDonalds Scenario 4: 4 Existing Background PMVersion 2022 (SP 0-0) Generated with 0.161Volume to Capacity (v/c): CLevel Of Service: 19.7Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM 6th EditionAnalysis Method: Two-way stopControl Type: Intersection 2: Los Gatos/Dwy 1 Intersection Level Of Service Report YesNoNoCrosswalk 0.000.000.00Grade [%] 25.0035.0035.00Speed [mph] 0.000.000.000.000.000.00Exit Pocket Length [ft] 000000No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 100.00100.0050.00100.00100.00100.00Entry Pocket Length [ft] 001000No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightLeftRightThruThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration EastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Dwy 1Los GatosLos GatosName Intersection Setup 000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 47036155212990Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 12093883250Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Peak Hour Factor 47036155212990Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0002642380Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Growth Factor 2.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 47036128810610Base Volume Input [veh/h] Dwy 1Los GatosLos GatosName Volumes TJW Engineering, Inc6 11/12/2021 Los Gatos Blvd McDonalds Scenario 4: 4 Existing Background PMVersion 2022 (SP 0-0) Generated with CIntersection LOS 0.32d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] CAAApproach LOS 19.680.000.00d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 14.130.000.000.000.000.0095th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 0.570.000.000.000.000.0095th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] CAAAMovement LOS 19.680.000.000.000.000.00d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 0.160.000.000.020.010.00V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results 000Number of Storage Spaces in Median NoTwo-Stage Gap Acceptance 000Storage Area [veh] Flared Lane StopFreeFreePriority Scheme Intersection Settings TJW Engineering, Inc7 11/12/2021 Los Gatos Blvd McDonalds Scenario 4: 4 Existing Background PMVersion 2022 (SP 0-0) Generated with 0.048Volume to Capacity (v/c): CLevel Of Service: 18.0Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM 6th EditionAnalysis Method: Two-way stopControl Type: Intersection 3: Los Gatos/Dwy 2 Intersection Level Of Service Report YesNoNoCrosswalk 0.000.000.00Grade [%] 25.0035.0035.00Speed [mph] 0.000.000.000.000.000.00Exit Pocket Length [ft] 000000No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 100.00100.0050.00100.00100.00100.00Entry Pocket Length [ft] 001000No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightLeftRightThruThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration EastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Dwy 2Los GatosLos GatosName Intersection Setup 000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 14024155212990Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 4063883250Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Peak Hour Factor 14024155212990Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0002642380Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Growth Factor 2.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 14024128810610Base Volume Input [veh/h] Dwy 2Los GatosLos GatosName Volumes TJW Engineering, Inc8 11/12/2021 Los Gatos Blvd McDonalds Scenario 4: 4 Existing Background PMVersion 2022 (SP 0-0) Generated with CIntersection LOS 0.09d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] CAAApproach LOS 17.950.000.00d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 3.760.000.000.000.000.0095th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 0.150.000.000.000.000.0095th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] CAAAMovement LOS 17.950.000.000.000.000.00d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 0.050.000.000.020.010.00V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results 000Number of Storage Spaces in Median NoTwo-Stage Gap Acceptance 000Storage Area [veh] Flared Lane StopFreeFreePriority Scheme Intersection Settings TJW Engineering, Inc9 11/12/2021 Los Gatos Blvd McDonalds Scenario 4: 4 Existing Background PMVersion 2022 (SP 0-0) Generated with Background plus Project Conditions 0.303Volume to Capacity (v/c): ALevel Of Service: 6.7Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM 6th EditionAnalysis Method: SignalizedControl Type: Intersection 1: Los Gatos/Los Gatos Village Sq Intersection Level Of Service Report YesYesYesCrosswalk NoNoNoCurb Present 0.000.000.00Grade [%] 25.0035.0035.00Speed [mph] 0.000.000.000.000.000.000.00Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0000000No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 100.00100.00100.00225.00200.00100.00225.00Entry Pocket Length [ft] 1001101No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightLeftThruLeftRightThruU-turnTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Los Gatos Village SqLos GatosLos GatosName Intersection Setup TJW Engineering, Inc1 11/12/2021 Los Gatos Blvd McDonalds Scenario 5: 5 Existing Background Project AMVersion 2022 (SP 0-0) Generated with 000Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 000v_ab, Corner Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 000v_ci, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing mi 000v_co, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 000v_di, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing m 000v_do, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 0000000Local Bus Stopping Rate [/h] 0000000On-Street Parking Maneuver Rate [/h] NoNoNoNoNoNoPresence of On-Street Parking 26103810413107345Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 1226026326811Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Peak Hour Factor 26103810413107345Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 0000000Right Turn on Red Volume [veh/h] 0000000Other Volume [veh/h] 0000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 00105001306Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 0000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Growth Factor 2.002.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 269331041394339Base Volume Input [veh/h] Los Gatos Village SqLos GatosLos GatosName Volumes TJW Engineering, Inc2 11/12/2021 Los Gatos Blvd McDonalds Scenario 5: 5 Existing Background Project AMVersion 2022 (SP 0-0) Generated with 0Pedestrian Clearance [s] 0Pedestrian Walk [s] 0Pedestrian Signal Group Exclusive Pedestrian Phase 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor 0.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Detector Length [ft] 0.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Detector Location [ft] NoNoNoNoNoPedestrian Recall NoNoNoNoNoMaximum Recall NoNoNoNoNoMinimum Recall 0.02.03.13.10.03.13.1l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 0.02.02.02.00.02.02.0l1, Start-Up Lost Time [s] NoNoNoRest In Walk 0.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Delayed Vehicle Green [s] 0171000140Pedestrian Clearance [s] 0550050Walk [s] 0.03.03.03.00.03.03.0Vehicle Extension [s] 026263802638Split [s] 0.01.01.01.00.01.01.0All red [s] 0.03.04.14.10.04.14.1Amber [s] 030303003030Maximum Green [s] 051050105Minimum Green [s] -Lead-Lead--LeadLead / Lag Auxiliary Signal Groups 0725061Signal Group PermissivePermissivePermissiveProtectedPermissivePermissiveProtectedControl Type Phasing & Timing 0.00Lost time [s] SingleBandPermissive Mode Lead Green - Beginning of First GreenOffset Reference 0.0Offset [s] Fully actuatedActuation Type Time of Day Pattern CoordinatedCoordination Type 90Cycle Length [s] -Signal Coordination Group YesLocated in CBD Intersection Settings TJW Engineering, Inc3 11/12/2021 Los Gatos Blvd McDonalds Scenario 5: 5 Existing Background Project AMVersion 2022 (SP 0-0) Generated with 2.678.2944.37115.652.1469.6555.0795th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 0.110.331.774.630.092.792.2095th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 1.484.6124.6564.251.1938.6930.6050th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 0.060.180.992.570.051.551.2250th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] NoYesNoYesNoYesNoCritical Lane Group DDADAAELane Group LOS 47.4054.322.7150.432.893.9657.55d, Delay for Lane Group [s/veh] 0.120.330.290.790.010.310.72X, volume / capacity Lane Group Results 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.00PF, progression factor 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Rp, platoon ratio 0.000.000.000.000.000.000.00d3, Initial Queue Delay [s] 3.3310.140.209.890.020.2414.74d2, Incremental Delay [s] 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor 0.110.110.500.110.500.500.11k, delay calibration 44.0744.182.5140.542.873.7242.81d1, Uniform Delay [s] 161836321321071343262c, Capacity [veh/h] 1431160345841603143145841603s, saturation flow rate [veh/h] 0.000.000.230.060.010.230.03(v / s)_i Volume / Saturation Flow Rate 0.010.010.790.080.750.750.04g / C, Green / Cycle 1171767673g_i, Effective Green Time [s] 2.002.003.103.103.103.103.10l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 0.000.000.000.000.000.000.00l1_p, Permitted Start-Up Lost Time [s] 4.004.005.105.105.105.105.10L, Total Lost Time per Cycle [s] 90909090909090C, Cycle Length [s] RCCLRCLLane Group Lane Group Calculations TJW Engineering, Inc4 11/12/2021 Los Gatos Blvd McDonalds Scenario 5: 5 Existing Background Project AMVersion 2022 (SP 0-0) Generated with Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh]57.55 3.96 2.89 50.43 2.71 54.32 47.40 Movement LOS E A A D A D D d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh]6.08 7.06 52.59 Approach LOS A A D d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh]6.73 Intersection LOS A Intersection V/C 0.303 Other Modes g_Walk,mi, Effective Walk Time [s]9.0 9.0 9.0 M_corner, Corner Circulation Area [ft²/ped]0.00 0.00 0.00 M_CW, Crosswalk Circulation Area [ft²/ped]0.00 0.00 0.00 d_p, Pedestrian Delay [s]36.46 36.46 36.46 I_p,int, Pedestrian LOS Score for Intersection 3.036 2.956 1.976 Crosswalk LOS C C A s_b, Saturation Flow Rate of the bicycle lane 2000 2000 2000 c_b, Capacity of the bicycle lane [bicycles/h]464 464 489 d_b, Bicycle Delay [s]26.54 26.54 25.70 I_b,int, Bicycle LOS Score for Intersection 2.182 2.188 1.573 Bicycle LOS B B A ----------------Ring 4 ----------------Ring 3 -------------765Ring 2 --------------21Ring 1 Sequence TJW Engineering, Inc5 11/12/2021 Los Gatos Blvd McDonalds Scenario 5: 5 Existing Background Project AMVersion 2022 (SP 0-0) Generated with 0.153Volume to Capacity (v/c): BLevel Of Service: 14.9Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM 6th EditionAnalysis Method: Two-way stopControl Type: Intersection 2: Los Gatos/Dwy 1 Intersection Level Of Service Report YesNoNoCrosswalk 0.000.000.00Grade [%] 25.0035.0035.00Speed [mph] 0.000.000.000.000.000.00Exit Pocket Length [ft] 000000No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 100.00100.0050.00100.00100.00100.00Entry Pocket Length [ft] 001000No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightLeftRightThruThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration EastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Dwy 1Los GatosLos GatosName Intersection Setup 000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 66053103610920Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 170132592730Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Peak Hour Factor 66053103610920Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 1607-700Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 17071041360Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Growth Factor 2.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 330399399560Base Volume Input [veh/h] Dwy 1Los GatosLos GatosName Volumes TJW Engineering, Inc6 11/12/2021 Los Gatos Blvd McDonalds Scenario 5: 5 Existing Background Project AMVersion 2022 (SP 0-0) Generated with BIntersection LOS 0.44d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] BAAApproach LOS 14.880.000.00d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 13.440.000.000.000.000.0095th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 0.540.000.000.000.000.0095th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] BAAAMovement LOS 14.880.000.000.000.000.00d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 0.150.000.000.010.010.00V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results 000Number of Storage Spaces in Median NoTwo-Stage Gap Acceptance 000Storage Area [veh] Flared Lane StopFreeFreePriority Scheme Intersection Settings TJW Engineering, Inc7 11/12/2021 Los Gatos Blvd McDonalds Scenario 5: 5 Existing Background Project AMVersion 2022 (SP 0-0) Generated with 0.040Volume to Capacity (v/c): BLevel Of Service: 13.8Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM 6th EditionAnalysis Method: Two-way stopControl Type: Intersection 3: Los Gatos/Dwy 2 Intersection Level Of Service Report YesNoNoCrosswalk 0.000.000.00Grade [%] 25.0035.0035.00Speed [mph] 0.000.000.000.000.000.00Exit Pocket Length [ft] 000000No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 100.00100.0050.00100.00100.00100.00Entry Pocket Length [ft] 001000No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightLeftRightThruThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration EastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Dwy 2Los GatosLos GatosName Intersection Setup 000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 17035105110920Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 4092632730Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Peak Hour Factor 17035105110920Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 204-400Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 5051161360Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Growth Factor 2.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 100269399560Base Volume Input [veh/h] Dwy 2Los GatosLos GatosName Volumes TJW Engineering, Inc8 11/12/2021 Los Gatos Blvd McDonalds Scenario 5: 5 Existing Background Project AMVersion 2022 (SP 0-0) Generated with BIntersection LOS 0.11d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] BAAApproach LOS 13.820.000.00d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 3.110.000.000.000.000.0095th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 0.120.000.000.000.000.0095th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] BAAAMovement LOS 13.820.000.000.000.000.00d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 0.040.000.000.010.010.00V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results 000Number of Storage Spaces in Median NoTwo-Stage Gap Acceptance 000Storage Area [veh] Flared Lane StopFreeFreePriority Scheme Intersection Settings TJW Engineering, Inc9 11/12/2021 Los Gatos Blvd McDonalds Scenario 5: 5 Existing Background Project AMVersion 2022 (SP 0-0) Generated with 0.434Volume to Capacity (v/c): BLevel Of Service: 12.1Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM 6th EditionAnalysis Method: SignalizedControl Type: Intersection 1: Los Gatos/Los Gatos Village Sq Intersection Level Of Service Report YesYesYesCrosswalk NoNoNoCurb Present 0.000.000.00Grade [%] 25.0035.0035.00Speed [mph] 0.000.000.000.000.000.000.00Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0000000No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 100.00100.00100.00225.00200.00100.00225.00Entry Pocket Length [ft] 1001101No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightLeftThruLeftRightThruU-turnTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Los Gatos Village SqLos GatosLos GatosName Intersection Setup TJW Engineering, Inc1 11/12/2021 Los Gatos Blvd McDonalds Scenario 6: 6 Existing Background Project PMVersion 2022 (SP 0-0) Generated with 000Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 000v_ab, Corner Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 000v_ci, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing mi 000v_co, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 000v_di, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing m 000v_do, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 0000000Local Bus Stopping Rate [/h] 0000000On-Street Parking Maneuver Rate [/h] NoNoNoNoNoNoPresence of On-Street Parking 341111386170115118647Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 928347432929712Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Peak Hour Factor 341111386170115118647Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 0000000Right Turn on Red Volume [veh/h] 0000000Other Volume [veh/h] 0000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 00268002404Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 0000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Growth Factor 2.002.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 34111111817011594643Base Volume Input [veh/h] Los Gatos Village SqLos GatosLos GatosName Volumes TJW Engineering, Inc2 11/12/2021 Los Gatos Blvd McDonalds Scenario 6: 6 Existing Background Project PMVersion 2022 (SP 0-0) Generated with 0Pedestrian Clearance [s] 0Pedestrian Walk [s] 0Pedestrian Signal Group Exclusive Pedestrian Phase 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor 0.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Detector Length [ft] 0.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Detector Location [ft] NoNoNoNoNoPedestrian Recall NoNoNoNoNoMaximum Recall NoNoNoNoNoMinimum Recall 0.02.03.13.10.03.13.1l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 0.02.02.02.00.02.02.0l1, Start-Up Lost Time [s] NoNoNoRest In Walk 0.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Delayed Vehicle Green [s] 0171000140Pedestrian Clearance [s] 0550050Walk [s] 0.03.03.03.00.03.03.0Vehicle Extension [s] 026393103325Split [s] 0.01.01.01.00.01.01.0All red [s] 0.03.04.14.10.04.14.1Amber [s] 030303003030Maximum Green [s] 051050105Minimum Green [s] -Lead-Lead--LeadLead / Lag Auxiliary Signal Groups 0725061Signal Group PermissivePermissivePermissiveProtectedPermissivePermissiveProtectedControl Type Phasing & Timing 0.00Lost time [s] SingleBandPermissive Mode Lead Green - Beginning of First GreenOffset Reference 0.0Offset [s] Fully actuatedActuation Type Time of Day Pattern CoordinatedCoordination Type 90Cycle Length [s] -Signal Coordination Group YesLocated in CBD Intersection Settings TJW Engineering, Inc3 11/12/2021 Los Gatos Blvd McDonalds Scenario 6: 6 Existing Background Project PMVersion 2022 (SP 0-0) Generated with 33.19122.24126.93181.4638.71156.1957.8295th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 1.334.895.087.261.556.252.3195th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 18.4467.9170.52100.8121.5086.7732.1250th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 0.742.722.824.030.863.471.2850th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] NoYesNoYesNoYesNoCritical Lane Group DDADAAELane Group LOS 39.1747.915.7746.667.249.0558.21d, Delay for Lane Group [s/veh] 0.260.760.420.830.130.410.74X, volume / capacity Lane Group Results 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.00PF, progression factor 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Rp, platoon ratio 0.000.000.000.000.000.000.00d3, Initial Queue Delay [s] 1.057.930.418.340.300.4515.42d2, Incremental Delay [s] 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor 0.110.110.500.110.500.500.11k, delay calibration 38.1239.985.3638.326.948.6142.79d1, Uniform Delay [s] 1301463263205892285963c, Capacity [veh/h] 1431160345841603143145841603s, saturation flow rate [veh/h] 0.020.070.300.110.080.260.03(v / s)_i Volume / Saturation Flow Rate 0.090.090.710.130.620.620.04g / C, Green / Cycle 88641156564g_i, Effective Green Time [s] 2.002.003.103.103.103.103.10l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 0.000.000.000.000.000.000.00l1_p, Permitted Start-Up Lost Time [s] 4.004.005.105.105.105.105.10L, Total Lost Time per Cycle [s] 90909090909090C, Cycle Length [s] RCCLRCLLane Group Lane Group Calculations TJW Engineering, Inc4 11/12/2021 Los Gatos Blvd McDonalds Scenario 6: 6 Existing Background Project PMVersion 2022 (SP 0-0) Generated with Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh]58.21 9.05 7.24 46.66 5.77 47.91 39.17 Movement LOS E A A D A D D d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh]10.61 10.24 45.86 Approach LOS B B D d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh]12.10 Intersection LOS B Intersection V/C 0.434 Other Modes g_Walk,mi, Effective Walk Time [s]9.0 9.0 9.0 M_corner, Corner Circulation Area [ft²/ped]0.00 0.00 0.00 M_CW, Crosswalk Circulation Area [ft²/ped]0.00 0.00 0.00 d_p, Pedestrian Delay [s]36.46 36.46 36.46 I_p,int, Pedestrian LOS Score for Intersection 3.131 3.047 2.058 Crosswalk LOS C C B s_b, Saturation Flow Rate of the bicycle lane 2000 2000 2000 c_b, Capacity of the bicycle lane [bicycles/h]620 753 489 d_b, Bicycle Delay [s]21.44 17.50 25.70 I_b,int, Bicycle LOS Score for Intersection 2.301 2.415 1.799 Bicycle LOS B B A ----------------Ring 4 ----------------Ring 3 -------------765Ring 2 --------------21Ring 1 Sequence TJW Engineering, Inc5 11/12/2021 Los Gatos Blvd McDonalds Scenario 6: 6 Existing Background Project PMVersion 2022 (SP 0-0) Generated with 0.178Volume to Capacity (v/c): CLevel Of Service: 20.0Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM 6th EditionAnalysis Method: Two-way stopControl Type: Intersection 2: Los Gatos/Dwy 1 Intersection Level Of Service Report YesNoNoCrosswalk 0.000.000.00Grade [%] 25.0035.0035.00Speed [mph] 0.000.000.000.000.000.00Exit Pocket Length [ft] 000000No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 100.00100.0050.00100.00100.00100.00Entry Pocket Length [ft] 001000No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightLeftRightThruThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration EastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Dwy 1Los GatosLos GatosName Intersection Setup 000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 52045155113050Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 130113883260Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Peak Hour Factor 52045155113050Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 204-400Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 3052672440Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Growth Factor 2.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 47036128810610Base Volume Input [veh/h] Dwy 1Los GatosLos GatosName Volumes TJW Engineering, Inc6 11/12/2021 Los Gatos Blvd McDonalds Scenario 6: 6 Existing Background Project PMVersion 2022 (SP 0-0) Generated with CIntersection LOS 0.35d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] CAAApproach LOS 19.970.000.00d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 15.900.000.000.000.000.0095th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 0.640.000.000.000.000.0095th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] CAAAMovement LOS 19.970.000.000.000.000.00d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 0.180.000.000.020.010.00V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results 000Number of Storage Spaces in Median NoTwo-Stage Gap Acceptance 000Storage Area [veh] Flared Lane StopFreeFreePriority Scheme Intersection Settings TJW Engineering, Inc7 11/12/2021 Los Gatos Blvd McDonalds Scenario 6: 6 Existing Background Project PMVersion 2022 (SP 0-0) Generated with 0.051Volume to Capacity (v/c): CLevel Of Service: 18.0Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM 6th EditionAnalysis Method: Two-way stopControl Type: Intersection 3: Los Gatos/Dwy 2 Intersection Level Of Service Report YesNoNoCrosswalk 0.000.000.00Grade [%] 25.0035.0035.00Speed [mph] 0.000.000.000.000.000.00Exit Pocket Length [ft] 000000No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 100.00100.0050.00100.00100.00100.00Entry Pocket Length [ft] 001000No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightLeftRightThruThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration EastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Dwy 2Los GatosLos GatosName Intersection Setup 000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 15029155313050Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 4073883260Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Peak Hour Factor 15029155313050Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 102-200Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0032672440Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Growth Factor 2.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 14024128810610Base Volume Input [veh/h] Dwy 2Los GatosLos GatosName Volumes TJW Engineering, Inc8 11/12/2021 Los Gatos Blvd McDonalds Scenario 6: 6 Existing Background Project PMVersion 2022 (SP 0-0) Generated with CIntersection LOS 0.09d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] CAAApproach LOS 18.010.000.00d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 4.050.000.000.000.000.0095th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 0.160.000.000.000.000.0095th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] CAAAMovement LOS 18.010.000.000.000.000.00d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 0.050.000.000.020.010.00V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results 000Number of Storage Spaces in Median NoTwo-Stage Gap Acceptance 000Storage Area [veh] Flared Lane StopFreeFreePriority Scheme Intersection Settings TJW Engineering, Inc9 11/12/2021 Los Gatos Blvd McDonalds Scenario 6: 6 Existing Background Project PMVersion 2022 (SP 0-0) Generated with Environmental Noise Assessment C ATTACHMENT 21‐43 (McDonalds Drive‐Thru, Los Gatos) 4‐18‐22 1 ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE ASSESSMENT    MCDONALDS DRIVE‐THRU   15475 LOS GATOS BOULEVARD  LOS GATOS, CALIFORNIA      WJVA Report No. 21‐43        PREPARED FOR    EMC PLANNING   301 LIGHTHOUSE AVENUE, SUITE C   MONTEREY, CA 93940      PREPARED BY    WJV ACOUSTICS, INC.  VISALIA, CALIFORNIA                             April 18, 2022  113 N. Church Street, Suite 203 ∙ Visalia, CA 93291∙ (559) 627-4923 ∙ 21‐43 (McDonalds Drive‐Thru, Los Gatos) 4‐18‐22 2 1. INTRODUCTION Project Description: An application for a variance from the Town Code and modification to the conditional use permit  (CUP) is being submitted to allow drive‐thru use in the existing McDonald’s restaurant located at  15475  Los  Gatos  Blvd.  A  single  drive‐thru  lane  is  being  proposed  with  an  entrance  at  the  southwest side of the property. New order and pick‐up windows will be installed on the eastern  side of the building but will not alter the exterior design. Per the existing CUP, project hours of  operation would be 7:00 a.m. to 1:00 p.m., Sunday through Thursday and 7:00 a.m. to midnight,  Friday and Saturday.   Environmental Noise Assessment: This  environmental  noise  assessment  has  been  prepared  to  determine  if  significant  noise  impacts  will  be  produced  by  the  project  and  to  describe  mitigation measures for noise if  significant impacts are determined.  The environmental noise assessment, prepared by WJV  Acoustics, Inc. (WJVA), is based upon the project site plan dated November 13, 2020, a Drive‐ Thru Queue Analysis and Traffic Impact Analysis prepared by TJW Engineering, Inc. and a project  site visit on August 18, 2021. Revisions to the site plan, queue analysis or other project‐related  information available to WJVA at the time the analysis was prepared may require a reevaluation  of the findings and/or recommendations of the report.    Appendix  A  provides  definitions  of  the  acoustical  terminology  used  in  this  report.  Unless  otherwise stated, all sound levels reported in this analysis are A‐weighted sound pressure levels  in decibels (dB).  A‐weighting de‐emphasizes the very low and very high frequencies of sound in  a manner similar to the human ear. Most community noise standards utilize A‐weighted sound  levels,  as  they  correlate  well  with  public  reaction  to  noise.  Appendix  B  provides  typical  A‐weighted sound levels for common noise sources.  21‐43 (McDonalds Drive‐Thru, Los Gatos) 4‐18‐22 3 2. THRESHOLDS OF SIGNIFICANCE The  CEQA  Guidelines  apply  the  following  questions  for  the  assessment  of  significant  noise  impacts for a project:  a. Would the project result in generation of a substantial temporary or permanent  increase in ambient noise levels in the vicinity of the project in excess of standards  established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards  of other agencies?    b. Would the project result in generation of excessive groundborne vibration or  groundborne noise levels?    c. For a project located within the vicinity of a private airstrip or an airport land use  plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public  airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working  in the project area to excessive noise levels?   a. Noise Level Standards Town of Los Gatos    The Town of Los Gatos Noise Element of the General Plan (2020) provides goals, policies and  guidelines for minimizing noise levels within the Town. The Noise Element applies General Plan  Guidelines established by the California Office of Planning Research (2003) to set noise and land  use compatibility guidelines for the Town. The guidelines are provided below as Figure 1 (Figure  NOI‐1 of the Noise Element).    21‐43 (McDonalds Drive‐Thru, Los Gatos) 4‐18‐22 4 FIGURE 1: NOISE AND LAND USE COMPATIBILITY         21‐43 (McDonalds Drive‐Thru, Los Gatos) 4‐18‐22 5 Additionally, Table NOI‐2 of the Noise Element establishes outdoor noise limits for the Town.  These outdoor noise limits are provided below as Table I.     TABLE I TOWN OF LOS GATOS OUTDOOR NOISE LIMITS (dBA)   LAND USE MAX LDN  MAX 24 HOUR  LEQ  COMPARABLE NOISE  SOURCE RESPONSE  Residential  55   Light Auto Traffic (100 feet)  Quiet  Commercial  70 Freeway Traffic (50 feet) Telephone  Difficult to Use  Industrial   70 Freeway Traffic (50 feet) Telephone  Difficult to Use  Intensive (Developed  Park)  55 Light Auto Traffic (100 feet) Quiet  Passive (Nature Park)   50  Light Auto Traffic (100 feet)  Quiet  Hospital  55 Light Auto Traffic (100 feet) Quiet  Educational    55  Light Auto Traffic (100 feet)  Quiet  Source:  Town of Los Gatos 2020 General Plan  Policy NOI‐3 of the Noise Element discusses the outdoor noise limits provided above in Table I,  and states that the Town should “pursue the outdoor noise limits shown in Table NOI‐2 as  representing long range community aspirations and work toward their accomplishment, even  though some may be presently unattainable”.     Additionally,  The  Town  of  Los  Gatos  Municipal  Code  provides  further  exterior  noise  limits  applicable to the project.      §16.20.015 (Exterior noise levels for residential zones) states “No person shall cause,  make, suffer or allow to be made by any machine, animal, device or any combination of  same in a residential zone, a noise level more than six (6) dB above the noise level specified  for that particular noise zone, as shown on the Noise Zone Map, during that particular  time frame, at any point outside of the property plane”.      §16.20.025 (Noise levels for commercial and industrial zones) states “No person shall  cause,  make,  suffer  or  allow  to  be  made  by  any  machine,  animal,  device  or  any  combination of same, in any commercial or industrial zone, a noise level more than eight  (8) dB above the noise level specified for that particular noise zone, as shown on the Noise  Zone Map, during that particular time frame, at any point outside of the property plane”.     The project site is located within an orange zone on the Town of Los Gatos Noise Zone Map. The  orange zone provides an ambient noise level of 48 dB between the hours of 10:00 p.m. to 6:00  a.m., 55 dB between the hours of 6:00 a.m. to 1:00 p.m., and 59 dB between the hours of 1:00  p.m. to 10:00 p.m. The applicable Municipal Code exterior noise level limits (based upon the  Town of Los Gatos Noise Zone Map and project site location) or provided below in Table II. The  Town of Los Gatos Noise Zone Map is provided as Figure 2.  21‐43 (McDonalds Drive‐Thru, Los Gatos) 4‐18‐22 6     TABLE II TOWN OF LOS GATOS EXTERIOR NOISE LEVEL LIMITS (dBA)   LAND USE 6:00 A.M.‐ 1:00 P.M. 1:00 P.M.‐ 10:00 P.M. 10:00 P.M.‐ 6:00 A.M.  Residential 61 65 54  Commercial/Industrial 63 67 56  Source:  Town of Los Gatos Municipal Code  State of California   There are no state noise standards that are applicable to the project.    Federal Noise Standards   There are no federal noise standards that are applicable to the project.    b. Construction Noise §16.20.035 (Construction) of the Town of Los Gatos Municipal Code establishes permissible hours  for construction activity.  The codes states “Notwithstanding any other provision of this chapter,  between the hours of 8:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m., weekdays and 9:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. weekends and  holidays, construction, alteration or repair activities which are authorized by a valid Town permit  or as otherwise allowed by Town permit, shall be allowed if they meet at least one of the following  noise limitations:     (1) No individual piece of equipment shall produce a noise level exceeding eighty‐five (85) dBA  at twenty‐five (25) feet. If the device is located within a structure on the property, the  measurement shall be made at distances as close to twenty‐five (25) feet from the device  as possible.     (2) The noise level at any point outside of the property plane shall not exceed eighty‐five (85)  dBA.”  21‐43 (McDonalds Drive‐Thru, Los Gatos) 4‐18‐22 7 3. SETTING   The proposed project site is an existing McDonalds restaurant, located at 15475 Los Gatos  Boulevard, in the Town of Los Gatos. The project site is located within a commercial/retail  shopping area, and is surrounded by commercial/retail land uses on all sides. There are existing  residential land uses located west of the project site, on Benedict Lane and Garden Lane. There  is an existing 6‐foot CMU wall along the property line separating the residential land uses and  the commercial/retail land uses in the shopping center area. The project site plan is provided as  Figure 1. The project site and vicinity are provided as Figure 2.      a. Background Noise Level Measurements Existing  noise  levels  in  the  project  vicinity  are  dominated  by traffic  noise  along  Los  Gatos  Boulevard.  Additional  sources  of  noise  observed  during  site  inspection  included  aircraft  overflights, commercial/retail activities, human voice, barking dogs and noise associated with  landscaping activities (lawnmower, blowers, etc.).      Measurements of existing ambient noise levels in the project vicinity were conducted on August  18 and 19, 2021. Short‐term (15‐minute) ambient noise level measurements were conducted at  two (2) locations (sites ST‐1 and ST‐2). Site ST‐1 was located along the property line of the closest  residential land uses to the project site (residences along the east side of Benedict Lane). Site ST‐ 2 was located in the vicinity of the McDonalds restaurant, near Los Gatos Boulevard. Three (3)  individual measurements were taken at both of short‐term sites to quantify ambient noise levels  in the morning, afternoon and evening hours. The locations of the two noise measurement sites  are provided on Figure 2.     Noise monitoring equipment consisted of Larson‐Davis Laboratories Model LDL‐820 sound level  analyzers equipped with B&K Type 4176 1/2” microphones. The equipment complies with the  specifications of the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) for Type I (Precision) sound  level meters. The meters were calibrated with a B&K Type 4230 acoustic calibrator to ensure the  accuracy of the measurements.     The noise measurement data included energy average (Leq) maximum (Lmax) as well as five  individual  statistical  parameters.  Observations  were  made  of  the  dominant  noise  sources  affecting the measurements. The statistical parameters describe the percent of time a noise level  was exceeded during the measurement period. For instance, the L90 describes the noise level  exceeded 90 percent of the time during the measurement period, and is generally considered to  represent the residual (or background) noise level in the absence of identifiable single noise  events from traffic, aircraft and other local noise sources. Table III summarizes short‐term noise  measurement results.             21‐43 (McDonalds Drive‐Thru, Los Gatos) 4‐18‐22 8   TABLE III SUMMARY OF SHORT-TERM NOISE MEASUREMENT DATA MCDONALDS RESTAURANT, LOS GATOS BOULEVARD AUGUST 18 & 19, 2021 Site Time A‐Weighted Decibels, dBA Sources Leq Lmax L2 L8 L25 L50 L90  ST‐1  7:45 a.m.  54.6  73.0  64.9  53.8  50.9  49.3  45.3  TR, V, L, IC, D  ST‐1 12:10 p.m. 53.8 65.5 62.8 59.7 51.7 47.3 44.2 TR, AC, IC  ST‐1  9:15 p.m.  49.0  64.0  58.9  52.1  46.1  44.4  43.2  TR, IC  ST‐2 8:05 p.m. 63.6 72.5 70.6 68.2 64.6 60.5 56.8 TR, AC, V  ST‐2  12:30 p.m.  60.4  71.3  66.2  63.9  61.9  57.9  52.0  TR, IC, V  ST‐2 9:35 p.m. 58.7 66.9 61.4 55.6 53.4 52.1 50.1 TR, IC, V  TR: Traffic   AC: Aircraft   V: Voices   L: Landscaping Activities   D: Dogs Barking  IC: Commercial/Retail Activity  Source: WJV Acoustics, Inc.   The overall noise measurement data indicate that noise in the project vicinity is highly influenced  by vehicular traffic on Los Gatos Boulevard as well as noise as sociated with the commercial/retail  shopping center. Lmax values were in the range of 64‐73 dBA, and were typically the result of a  loud vehicle.   21‐43 (McDonalds Drive‐Thru, Los Gatos) 4‐18‐22 9 4. PROJECT-RELATED NOISE LEVELS DRIVE‐THRU OPERATIONS‐  The project is the addition of drive‐thru operations at an existing McDonalds restaurant, in the  Town of Los Gatos. The drive‐thru would include an amplified menu board at which customers  and employees communicate specific food order details. Per the existing CUP, project hours of  operation would be 7:00 a.m. to 1:00 p.m., Sunday through Thursday and 7:00 a.m. to midnight,  Friday and Saturday. Noise levels associated with the menu board, and resulting impacts on  nearby sensitive receptors (residential and commercial land uses) are discussed below.     The project would incorporate a 3M Model XT‐1 intercom system at the menu board. The XT‐1  intercom system provides an adjustable noise level, allowing for project compliance with noise  standards at nearby sensitive receptor locations. Noise levels associated with amplified speech  through the XT‐1 can be reduced down to a minimum level of approximately 65 dB at a distance  of 4 feet from the center of the speaker. Speaker noise levels would be expected to attenuate at  the standard rate of attenuation with increased distance from a point source, ‐6 dB/doubling of  distance.     Per the Town of Los Gatos Municipal Code noise standards, and the project location (see Figure  2, Town of Los Gatos Noise Zone Map), the maximum allowable noise levels (at nearby residential  land uses) would be 54 dB between the hours of 10:00 p.m. to 6:00 a.m., 61 dB between the  hours of 6:00 a.m. to 1:00 p.m. and 65 dB between the hours of 1:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m. The  digital menu board would be located approximately 350 feet from the closest residential land  uses (in the vicinity of noise measurement locations ST‐1) and approximately 75 feet from the  closest commercial land uses (Leslie’s Pool Supplies). Table IV provides the allowable maximum  noise level and the required maximum menu‐board noise level required to comply with the  applicable hourly noise standards, as determined by the Town of Los Gatos Noise Zone Map.      TABLE IV MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE NOISE LEVELS, AND REQUIRED NOISE LEVEL SETTINGS AT 4-FEET (dBA)   LAND USE  6:00 A.M.‐ 1:00 P.M. 1:00 P.M.‐ 10:00 P.M. 10:00 P.M.‐ 6:00 A.M.  Maximum  Allowable  Noise Level  Menu  Board  Noise Level  at 4‐Feet  Maximum  Allowable  Noise Level  Menu  Board  Noise Level  at 4‐Feet  Maximum  Allowable  Noise  Level  Menu  Board Noise  Level at 4‐ Feet  Residential 61  100  65  104  54  93  Commercial/Industrial 63 89 67 93 56 82  Source:  Town of Los Gatos Municipal Code  As stated above, the project would incorporate a 3M Model XT‐1 intercom system at the menu  board. The XT‐1 intercom system provides an adjustable noise level at the speaker system, and  can be set to produce noise levels as low as 65 dB at distance of 4 feet from the menu board  21‐43 (McDonalds Drive‐Thru, Los Gatos) 4‐18‐22 10 speaker. Reference to Table IV indicates that intercom speaker noise levels must be set at or  below 89 dB between the hours of 6:00 a.m. to 1:00 p.m., at or below 93 dB between the hours  of 1:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m. and at or below 82 dB between the hours of 10:00 p.m. to 6:00 a.m.  Applying  these  maximum  noise  level  settings  to  the  menu  board  speaker  would  ensure  compliance with the Town of Los Gatos noise level standards. It should be noted, the resulting  noise levels at these settings would produce noise levels well below existing (without project)  ambient noise levels at both the closest residential land uses (vicinity of ambient measurement  site LT‐1) and commercial land uses (vicinity of ambient noise measurement site LT‐2).     PROJECT‐RELATED INCREASES IN TRAFFIC NOISE‐  WJVA utilized the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) Highway Traffic Noise Prediction  Model  (FHWA‐RD‐77‐108)  to  quantify  expected  project‐related  increases  in  traffic  noise  exposure along Los Gatos Boulevard, in the project vicinity. The FHWA Model is a standard  analytical method used for roadway traffic noise calculations. The model is based upon reference  energy emission levels for automobiles, medium trucks (2 axles) and heavy trucks (3 or more  axles), with consideration given to vehicle volume, speed, roadway configuration, distance to the  receiver, and the acoustical characteristics of the site. The FHWA Model was developed to predict  hourly Leq values for free‐flowing traffic conditions, and is generally considered to be accurate  within ±1.5 dB.  To predict Ldn values, it is necessary to determine the hourly distribution of traffic  for a typical day and adjust the traffic volume input data to yield an equivalent hourly traffic  volume.    Traffic noise exposure levels for Background Conditions and Background Plus Project Conditions  were calculated based upon the FHWA Model and traffic volumes provided by TJW Engineering,  Inc.  Background  conditions  volumes  include  existing  and  recently  approved  projects  in  the  vicinity of the proposed project. The day/night distribution of traffic and the percentages of  trucks on the roadways used for modeling were estimated based on previous studies WJVA has  conducted along similar roadways. The Noise modeling assumptions used to calculate project  traffic noise are provided as Appendix C.     Table V provides a comparison of traffic noise levels along Los Gatos Boulevard for Background  Conditions  and  Background  Plus  Project  Conditions  traffic  conditions. While there are no  sensitive receptors (residential land uses) located along Los Gatos Boulevard, in the project  vicinity, this traffic noise analysis is provided as a reference. Noise levels were modeled at a  reference setback distance of 100 feet from the centerline of Los Gatos Boulevard. For the  purpose of the analysis, the following assumptions were applied:     35 mph (miles per hour) traffic speed   2% medium truck and 1% heavy truck percentages   90% daytime (7 am to 10 pm) and 10% nighttime (10 pm to 7 am) distribution              21‐43 (McDonalds Drive‐Thru, Los Gatos) 4‐18‐22 11   TABLE V TRAFFIC NOISE EXPOSURE LEVELS, dBA LDN MCDONALDS RESTAURANT, LOS GATOS BOULEVARD   Roadway Background Conditions  Background Plus  Project Conditions Increase Impact  Yes/No?  Los Gatos Blvd  n/o Los Gatos Village Center 63  63  0  No  Los Gatos Blvd  s/o Los Gatos Village Center 63 63 0 No  1At a typical residential setback (assumed to be 100 feet from the center of the roadway).  Source: WJV Acoustics                 TJW Engineering, Inc.  Table V provides the modeled exterior traffic noise exposure levels at reference setback distance  of 100 feet from Los Gatos Boulevard. Reference to Table V indicates that the project would not  be expected to result in any increases in traffic noise exposure along Los Gatos Boulevard, in the  vicinity of the project site.                                                        21‐43 (McDonalds Drive‐Thru, Los Gatos) 4‐18‐22 12   5. IMPACT SUMMARY Project‐related noise levels resulting from the proposed addition of drive‐thru operations at the  existing McDonalds restaurant located at 15475 Los Gatos Boulevard, in the Town of Los Gatos,  would not be expected to exceed Town of Los Gatos noise level standards as long as the 3M  Model XT‐1 intercom system noise levels are adjusted as to reflect the maximum allowable noise  levels described above (at a distance of 4 feet) in Table IV. The intercom speaker noise levels  must be set at or below 89 dB (at four feet) between the hours of 6:00 a.m. to 1:00 p.m., at or  below 93 dB (at four feet) between the hours of 1:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m. and at or below 82 dB  (at four feet) between the hours of 10:00 p.m. to 6:00 a.m.    Traffic noise exposure along Los Gatos Boulevard, in the vicini ty of the project site, was calculated  for both Background Conditions and Background Plus Project Conditions. As described above in  Table V, the project would not be expected to result in any increases in traffic noise exposure  along Los Gatos Boulevard, in the vicinity of the project.         21‐43 (McDonalds Drive‐Thru, Los Gatos) 4‐18‐22 13FIGURE 1: PROJECT SITE PLAN 21‐43 (McDonalds Drive‐Thru, Los Gatos) 4‐18‐22 14FIGURE 2: PROJECT VICINITY AND AMBIENT NOISE MONITORING SITES APPENDIX A-1 ACOUSTICAL TERMINOLOGY AMBIENT NOISE LEVEL: The composite of noise from all sources near and far. In this context, the ambient noise level constitutes the normal or existing level of environmental noise at a given location. CNEL: Community Noise Equivalent Level. The average equivalent sound level during a 24-hour day, obtained after addition of approximately five decibels to sound levels in the evening from 7:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m. and ten decibels to sound levels in the night before 7:00 a.m. and after 10:00 p.m. DECIBEL, dB: A unit for describing the amplitude of sound, equal to 20 times the logarithm to the base 10 of the ratio of the pressure of the sound measured to the reference pressure, which is 20 micropascals (20 micronewtons per square meter). DNL/Ldn: Day/Night Average Sound Level. The average equivalent sound level during a 24-hour day, obtained after addition of ten decibels to sound levels in the night after 10:00 p.m. and before 7:00 a.m. Leq: Equivalent Sound Level. The sound level containing the same total energy as a time varying signal over a given sample period. Leq is typically computed over 1, 8 and 24-hour sample periods. NOTE: The CNEL and DNL represent daily levels of noise exposure averaged on an annual basis, while Leq represents the average noise exposure for a shorter time period, typically one hour. Lmax: The maximum noise level recorded during a noise event. Ln: The sound level exceeded "n" percent of the time during a sample interval (L90, L50, L10, etc.). For example, L10 equals the level exceeded 10 percent of the time. A-2 ACOUSTICAL TERMINOLOGY NOISE EXPOSURE CONTOURS: Lines drawn about a noise source indicating constant levels of noise exposure. CNEL and DNL contours are frequently utilized to describe community exposure to noise. NOISE LEVEL REDUCTION (NLR): The noise reduction between indoor and outdoor environments or between two rooms that is the numerical difference, in decibels, of the average sound pressure levels in those areas or rooms. A measurement of Anoise level reduction” combines the effect of the transmission loss performance of the structure plus the effect of acoustic absorption present in the receiving room. SEL or SENEL: Sound Exposure Level or Single Event Noise Exposure Level. The level of noise accumulated during a single noise event, such as an aircraft overflight, with reference to a duration of one second. More specifically, it is the time-integrated A-weighted squared sound pressure for a stated time interval or event, based on a reference pressure of 20 micropascals and a reference duration of one second. SOUND LEVEL: The sound pressure level in decibels as measured on a sound level meter using the A-weighting filter network. The A-weighting filter de-emphasizes the very low and very high frequency components of the sound in a manner similar to the response of the human ear and gives good correlation with subjective reactions to noise. SOUND TRANSMISSION CLASS (STC): The single-number rating of sound transmission loss for a construction element (window, door, etc.) over a frequency range where speech intelligibility largely occurs. Tree Inventory, Assessment, and Protection Report D ATTACHMENT Tree Inventory, Assessment, and Protection Report 15475 Los Gatos Boulevard Los Gatos, CA 95032 Prepared for: Town of Los Gatos April 28, 2021 Prepared By: Richard Gessner ASCA - Registered Consulting Arborist ® #496 ISA - Board Certified Master Arborist® WE-4341B 15475 Los Gatos Boulevard Tree Inventory, Assessment and Protection Report April 28, 2021 Table of Content Summary 1 ............................................................................................................... Introduction 1 ........................................................................................................... Background 1 ............................................................................................................ Assignment 1 ............................................................................................................. Limits of the assignment 1 ........................................................................................ Purpose and use of the report 2 ................................................................................ Observations 2 ......................................................................................................... Tree Inventory 2 ......................................................................................................... Analysis 4 ................................................................................................................. Discussion 5 ............................................................................................................. Condition Rating 5 ..................................................................................................... Suitability for Conservation 6 .................................................................................... Expected Impact Level 6 ........................................................................................... Tree Protection 8 ....................................................................................................... Conclusion 8 ............................................................................................................ Recommendations 9 ............................................................................................... Bibliography 10 ........................................................................................................ Glossary of Terms 11 ............................................................................................... Appendix A: Tree Inventory Map and Site Plan 13 ................................................ Appendix B: Tree Inventory and Assessment Tables 14 ...................................... Appendix C: Photographs 18 .................................................................................. Monarch Consulting Arborists LLC - P.O Box 1010, Felton, CA 95018 831.331.8982 - rick@monarcharborist.com 15475 Los Gatos Boulevard Tree Inventory, Assessment and Protection Report April 28, 2021 C1: Canary island pines 492 to 497 18 ..................................................................... C2: Dead redwoods 489 and 491 19 ......................................................................... Appendix D: Tree Protection Guidelines 20 ........................................................... D1: Plan Sheet Detail S-X (Type I) 20 ........................................................................ D2: Plan Sheet Detail S-Y (Type III) 21 ...................................................................... D3: Section 29.10.1005. - Protection of Trees During Construction 22 .................... Tree Protection Zones and Fence Specifications 22 ................................................. All persons, shall comply with the following precautions 23 ..................................... Prohibited Activities 23 .............................................................................................. Monitoring 24 ............................................................................................................ Root Pruning 24 ......................................................................................................... Boring or Tunneling 24 ............................................................................................... Tree Pruning and Removal Operations 24 ................................................................. Appendix E: Tree Protection Signs 25 .................................................................... E1: English 25 ............................................................................................................ E2: Spanish 26 ........................................................................................................... Qualifications, Assumptions, and Limiting Conditions 27 ................................... Certification of Performance 28............................................................................. Monarch Consulting Arborists LLC - P.O Box 1010, Felton, CA 95018 831.331.8982 - rick@monarcharborist.com 15475 Los Gatos Boulevard Tree Inventory, Assessment and Protection Report April 28, 2021 Summary The plans indicate a new traffic flow pattern through the parking lot to accommodate a drive through for the McDonalds restaurant. The inventory contains 46 trees comprised of 9 different species. One coast live oak (Quercus agrifolia) is considered Large Protected, two olive (Olea europaea) trees are Exempt, and two London plane (Platanus x hispanica) are Street Trees. Twenty trees are in good condition, twenty-two fair, one poor, one very poor, and two coast redwoods (Sequoia sempervirens) are dead. Trees in poor, very poor, or dead condition and a few are considered invasive plants and poorly suited for retention. Six trees could be highly impacted by the proposed renovation and landscaping while the remaining trees around the parking lot will not be affected. There is limited detail provided on the extent of work around the six Canary Island pines (Pinus canariensis) #492 through #497. The proposed landscape area “approximate location of proposed evergreen trees” already contains pines #492 through #497. Adding a landscape area on grade may be possible, or extending the existing planting area and removing the asphalt, but the existing trees will not allow for extensive renovation or soil cutting in this area. No other detail was provided. Re- striping and a top coat over the existing asphalt will not affect the trees. For Canary Island pines #492 through #497 they would need to have their trunks protected during proposed renovation and care not to destroy the surface roots under the existing asphalt will be required. There were 46 trees appraised for a rounded depreciated value of $179,600.00. Introduction Background
 The Town of Los Gatos asked me to assess the site, trees, and proposed footprint plan, and to provide a report with my findings and recommendations to help satisfy planning requirements. Assignment •Provide an arborist’s report including an assessment of the trees within the project area and on the adjacent sites. The assessment is to include the species, size (trunk diameter), condition (health, structure, and form), and suitability for preservation ratings. Affix number tags on the trees for reference on site and on plans. •Provide tree protection specifications, guidelines, and impact ratings for those affected by the project. •Provide appraised values using the Trunk Formula Technique. Limits of the assignment •The information in this report is limited to the condition of the trees during my inspection on April 26, 2021. No tree risk assessments were performed. •Tree heights and canopy diameters are estimates. Monarch Consulting Arborists LLC - P.O Box 1010, Felton, CA 95018 831.331.8982 - rick@monarcharborist.com Page of 1 28 15475 Los Gatos Boulevard Tree Inventory, Assessment and Protection Report April 28, 2021 •The plans reviewed for this assignment were as follows (Table 1) Purpose and use of the report The report is intended to identify all the trees within the plan area that could be affected by a project. The report is to be used by the Town of Los Gatos and the property owners as a reference for existing tree conditions to help satisfy planning requirements. Observations Tree Inventory The inventory consists of trees protected by the Town of Los Gatos located on site and those in close proximity on neighboring properties. Sec. 29.10.0960. - Scope of protected trees. All trees which have a four-inch or greater diameter (twelve and one half-inch circumference) of any trunk, when removal relates to any review for which zoning approval or subdivision approval is required. (Appendix A and B). Los Gatos Town Ordinance 29.10.0970 Exceptions (1) states the following: “A fruit or nut tree that is less than eighteen (18) inches in diameter (fifty-seven-inch circumference). The plans indicate a new traffic flow pattern through the parking lot to accommodate a drive through for the McDonalds restaurant. Table 1: Plans Reviewed Checklist Plan Date Sheet Reviewed Source Existing Site Topographic Proposed Site Plan 11/13/2020 PSP Yes Core States Group Erosion Control Grading and Drainage Utility Plan and Hook-up locations Exterior Elevations Landscape Plan Irrigation Plan T-1 Tree Protection Plan Monarch Consulting Arborists LLC - P.O Box 1010, Felton, CA 95018 831.331.8982 - rick@monarcharborist.com Page of 2 28 15475 Los Gatos Boulevard Tree Inventory, Assessment and Protection Report April 28, 2021 The inventory contains 46 trees comprised of 9 different species (Chart 1). One coast live oak is considered Large Protected by virtue 1 of two trunks (15 and 13 inches respectively) totally more than 24 inches, two olive trees are Exempt , and two London plane are 2 Street Trees. Large protected tree means any oak (Quercus spp.), California buckeye (Aesculus californica), or Pacific madrone (Arbutus menziesii) which has a 24-inch or 1 greater diameter (75-inch circumference); or any other species of tree with a 48-inch or greater diameter (150-inch circumference). A fruit or nut tree that is less than eighteen (18) inches in diameter (fifty-seven-inch circumference).2 Monarch Consulting Arborists LLC - P.O Box 1010, Felton, CA 95018 831.331.8982 - rick@monarcharborist.com Page of 3 28 Quantity 15475 Los Gatos Boulevard Tree Inventory, Assessment and Protection Report April 28, 2021 Analysis Tree appraisal was performed according to the Council of Tree & Landscape Appraisers Guide for Plant Appraisal 10th Edition, 2019 (CLTA) along with Western Chapter International Society of Arboriculture Species Classification and Group Assignment, 2004. The trees were appraised using the “Cost Approach” and more specifically the “Trunk Formula Technique” (Appendix B). “Trunk Formula Technique” is calculated as follows: Basic Tree Cost = (Unit tree cost x Appraised trunk area), Appraised Value = (Basic tree cost X functional Limitations (percentage) X Condition (percentage) X External Limitations (percentage)). The trunk formula valuations are based on four tree factors; size (trunk cross sectional area), condition, functional limitations, and external limitations. There are two steps to determine the overall value. The first step is to determine the “Basic Tree Cost” based on size and unit tree cost. Unit tree cost is calculated by dividing the nursery wholesale cost of a 24 inch box specimen and its replacement size (cost per square inch trunk caliper) which is determined by the Species Classification and Group Assignment, 2004 Western Chapter Regional Supplement. The cost of the 24 inch box wholesale specimen was determined through personal communications with BrightView and Normans nurseries in Farmington and Central Wholesale in San Jose for an average of $214.00. The second part is to depreciate the tree’s Basic Cost through an assessment of condition, functional limitations, and external limitations. The condition assessment guidelines and percentages are defined in the “Condition Rating” section of this report. Functional limitations are based on factors associated with the tree’s interaction to its planting site that would affect condition, limit development, or reduce the utility in the future and include genetics, placement, and site conditions for the individual tree. External limitations are outside the property, out of control of the owner and also affect condition, limit development, or reduce the utility in the future (i.e power lines, municipal restrictions, drought adaptations, or species susceptibility to pests). There were 46 trees appraised for a rounded depreciated value of $179,600.00. Appraisal worksheets are available upon request Monarch Consulting Arborists LLC - P.O Box 1010, Felton, CA 95018 831.331.8982 - rick@monarcharborist.com Page of 4 28 15475 Los Gatos Boulevard Tree Inventory, Assessment and Protection Report April 28, 2021 Discussion Condition Rating A tree’s condition is a determination of its overall health, structure, and form. The assessment considered all three criteria for a combined condition rating. •100% - Exceptional = Good health and structure with significant size, location or quality. •61-80% - Good = Normal vigor, well-developed structure, function and aesthetics not compromised with good longevity for the site. •41-60 % - Fair = Reduced vigor, damage, dieback, or pest problems, at least one significant structural problem or multiple moderate defects requiring treatment. Major asymmetry or deviation from the species normal habit, function and aesthetics compromised. •21-40% - Poor = Unhealthy and declining appearance with poor vigor, abnormal foliar color, size or density with potential irreversible decline. One serious structural defect or multiple significant defects that cannot be corrected and failure may occur at any time. Significant asymmetry and compromised aesthetics and intended use. •6-20% - Very Poor = Poor vigor and dying with little foliage in irreversible decline. Severe defects with the likelihood of failure being probable or imminent. Aesthetically poor with little or no function in the landscape. •0-5% - Dead/Unstable = Dead or imminently ready to fail. Twenty trees are in good condition, twenty-two fair, one poor, one very poor, and two coast redwoods are dead (Chart 2). Monarch Consulting Arborists LLC - P.O Box 1010, Felton, CA 95018 831.331.8982 - rick@monarcharborist.com Page of 5 28 Quantity 15475 Los Gatos Boulevard Tree Inventory, Assessment and Protection Report April 28, 2021 Suitability for Conservation A tree’s suitability for preservation is determined based on Functional and External Limitations (ISA, 2019). 3 •Good = Trees with good health, structural stability and longevity. •Fair = Trees with fair health and/or structural defects that may be mitigated through treatment. These trees require more intense management and monitoring, and may have shorter life spans than those in the good category. •Poor = Trees in poor health with significant structural defects that cannot be mitigated and will continue to decline regardless of treatment. The species or individual may possess characteristics that are incompatible or undesirable in landscape settings or unsuited for the intended use of the site. Trees in poor, very poor, or dead condition including a few Brazilian peppers are all poorly suited for retention. The Canary Island pines and coast live oaks have good suitability while the coast redwoods fair. Some redwoods are large and established while others are stunted and drought stressed. There is one lone Aleppo pine along the west side that has fair suitability but it appears out of place in the parking lot. Expected Impact Level Impact level defines how a tree may be affected by construction activity and proximity to the tree, and is described as low, moderate, or high. The following scale defines the impact rating: •Low = The construction activity will have little influence on the tree. •Moderate = The construction may cause future health or structural problems, and steps must be taken to protect the tree to reduce future problems. •High = Tree structure and health will be compromised and removal is recommended, or other actions must be taken for the tree to remain. The tree is located in the building envelope. Six trees could be highly impacted by the proposed renovation and landscaping while the remaining trees around the parking lot will not be affected. There is limited detail provided on the extent of work around the six pines #492 through #497. Functional Limitations are based on factors associated with the tree’s interaction to its planting site affecting plant condition, limiting plant 3 development, or reducing the utility in the future and include genetics, placement, and site conditions for the individual tree (ISA, 2019). External Limitations are outside the property, out of control of the owner and also affect plant condition, limit plant development, or reduce the utility in the future (i.e power lines, municipal restrictions, drought adaptations, or species susceptibility to pests) (ISA, 2019). Monarch Consulting Arborists LLC - P.O Box 1010, Felton, CA 95018 831.331.8982 - rick@monarcharborist.com Page of 6 28 15475 Los Gatos Boulevard Tree Inventory, Assessment and Protection Report April 28, 2021 The proposed landscape area “approximate location of proposed evergreen trees” already contains Canary Island pines #492 through #497. These are all healthy mature trees with roots extending into the existing parking lot evidenced by the heaving asphalt adjacent to the trees. Adding a landscape area on grade may be possible, or extending the existing planting area and removing the asphalt, but the existing trees will not allow for extensive renovation or soil cutting in this area. No other detail was provided. Monarch Consulting Arborists LLC - P.O Box 1010, Felton, CA 95018 831.331.8982 - rick@monarcharborist.com Page of 7 28 LOS GATOS ROADYOUTHANK THRUDRIVETHRUDRIVETHRUDRIVE60'NO PARKINGNO PARKING15' FRONT BUILDING SETBACK 3 2 2 4 7 5 4 39787 16 20' 15' 5.75 ' 5.75'10'15'23.67'12'9'2 3 . 3 5 ' R20' R30' R45' R2' R10'R5'R5' R3'9'8'9'9'9'8'9'18'5'3.6'35°'35°'15'50°' R3.5' 6' 5'20.2 3 ' 99.8'61.01'156.91'61.13'R5'5'18' 9'23.33'1 1 2 3 4 4 A B B B B C C CC D D D E E F FF F GGG G H H I J J KJJ J K J K M L N N N N N N P O O O O D B6'6'5'6'6'5'7'5' 5' JJJJ J R3' R3' Q QR 1A2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13BCD E F G H I DOCUMENTS PREPARED BY CORESTATES, INC.,INCLUDING THIS DOCUMENT, ARE TO BE USEDONLY FOR THE SPECIFIC PROJECT AND SPECIFICUSE FOR WHICH THEY WERE INTENDED. ANYEXTENSION OF USE TO ANY OTHER PROJECTS,BY OWNER OR BY ANY OTHER PARTY, WITHOUTTHE EXPRESSED WRITTEN CONSENT OFCORESTATES, INC. IS DONE UNLAWFULLY ANDAT THE USERS OWN RISK. IF USED IN A WAYOTHER THAN THAT SPECIFICALLY INTENDED,USER WILL HOLD CORESTATES, INC. HARMLESSFROM ALL CLAIMS AND LOSSES. Drawing: P:\McDonalds\MRP\Los Gatos, CA (15475 Los Gatos Blvd) 004-0582 -MCD.30686\CIVIL\Drawings\Concepts - Exhibits\MCD.30686 PSP.dwg ;Layout1Plot Date/Time: Feb. 16, 21 - 17:05:27User: KPETRI SITE LOCATION ENGINEER SEAL DOCUMENT REVISIONS REV DATE COMMENT BY CLIENT CHECKED BY: SHEET NO. JOB #: SCALE: DRAWN BY: DATE: SHEET TITLE THE CONTRACTOR IS SPECIFICALLY CAUTIONED THAT THE LOCATION AND/OR ELEVATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES AS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS IS BASED ON DESIGN DRAWINGS, RECORDS OF THE VARIOUS UTILITY COMPANIES, AND WHERE POSSIBLE, MEASUREMENTS TAKEN IN THE FIELD. CORE STATES, INC. DOES NOT GUARANTEE THAT LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE EXACT. THE CONTRACTOR MUST CONTACT THE APPROPRIATE UTILITY COMPANIES AT LEAST 72 HOURS BEFORE ANY EXCAVATION TO REQUEST EXACT FIELD LOCATIONS OF UTILITIES. &DOOEHIRUH\RXGLJEHORZ.QRZZKDW V 4240 East Jurupa Street, Suite 402Ontario, CA 91761Phone (909) 467-8919Bhumann@core-states.comMCD.30686 11/13/2020 KP ZM 15475 LOS GATOS BLVD, LOS GATOS, CA 95032 1" = 20' 0 2010205 GRAPHIC SCALE PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN PSP 1" = 20' SITE LEGEND EXISTING PROPERTY BOUNDARY LINE EXISTING ADJOINING PROPERTY LINE PROPOSED CURB PROPOSED DEPRESSED CURB PROPOSED SIDEWALK PROPOSED CONCRETE PROPOSED PARKING COUNT PROPOSED BUILDING PROPOSED ASPHALT PROPOSED CURB AND GUTTER EXISTING UTILITY EASEMENT EXISTING EDGE OF PAVEMENT EXISTING WATER STRUCTURE EXISTING SANITARY STRUCTURES =< EXISTING CURB AND GUTTER EXISTING STORMWATER STRUCTURES SPILL GUTTER D XX S PP EXISTING ELECTRIC STRUCTURE GENERAL NOTES:APPLICANT/OWNER:MCDONALD'S CORPORATION2527 CAMINO RAMON ST. 300SAN RAMON, CA 945831) SITE ADDRESS:15475 LOS GATOS ROAD LOS GATOS, CA 95032SANTA CLARA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA2) A.P.N.424-19-0653) ZONING DATA:29.60.420 ZONED: CH - HIGHWAY COMMERCIALEXISTING USE: RESTAURANTPROPOSED USE: RESTAURANT(PERMITTED)REQUIRED EXISTING PROPOSEDMIN. LOT AREA:N/A 1.334 AC.1.334 ACN/A (58,125 S.F.)(58,125 S.F.)MIN. LOT FRONTAGE: N/A 195.03'195.03'MIN. LOT WIDTH:N/A 301.65'301.65'MIN. FRONT YARD: 15'99.80' (E) 99.80' (E)MIN. SIDE YARD:0'61.01' (S)61.01' (S) 61.13' (N)61.13' (N)MIN. REAR YARD:0'156.91' (W)156.91' (W)MAX. IMPERVIOUSSURFACE:N/A 79.56%78.46%(46,244 S.F.)(46,607 S.F.)MAX. HEIGHT:35'16'-1"16'-1"4) PARKING REQUIREMENTS:29.10.1501 SPACE PER 235 SQUARE FEET OF NET PUBLIC AREA.4,267 S.F. X (1/235) = 19 SPACESREQUIRED = 19 SPACESEXISTING McDONALD'S AREA PARKING: 92 SPACES (INCLUDING 4 ACCESSIBLE SPACES)PROPOSED McDONALD'S AREA PARKING: 77 SPACES (INCLUDING 4 ACCESSIBLE SPACES)PARKING STALL DIMENSIONS:EXISTING: VARIESREQUIRED: 9'X18'PROPOSED: 9'X18'4) ALL EXISTING FEATURES ARE TO REMAIN UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.5) ALL PAVEMENT MARKINGS SHALL BE LONG LIFE EPOXY.6) PRIOR TO STARTING CONSTRUCTION, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BERESPONSIBLE TO MAKE SURE THAT ALL REQUIRED PERMITS AND APPROVALSHAVE BEEN OBTAINED. NO CONSTRUCTION OR FABRICATION SHALL BEGIN UNTIL THE CONTRACTOR HAS RECEIVED AND THOROUGHLY REVIEWED ALL PLANS AND OTHER DOCUMENTS BY ALL OF THE PERMITTING AUTHORITIES. 7) ALL WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THESE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND THE REQUIREMENTS AND STANDARDS OF THE LOCAL GOVERNING AUTHORITY. 8) ALL DIMENSIONS SHOWN ON THE PLANS SHALL BE FIELD VERIFIED BY THE CONTRACTOR PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY ENGINEER IF ANY DISCREPANCIES EXIST PRIOR TO PROCEEDING WITH CONSTRUCTION FOR NECESSARY PLAN CHANGES. NO EXTRA COMPENSATION SHALL BE PAID TO THE CONTRACTOR FOR WORK HAVING TO BE REDONE DUE TO DIMENSIONS OR GRADES SHOWN INCORRECTLY ON THESE PLANS IF SUCH NOTIFICATION HAS NOT BEEN GIVEN. 9) SOLID WASTE TO BE DISPOSED OF BY CONTRACTOR IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL LOCAL, STATE AND FEDERAL REGULATIONS. 10) ALL EXCAVATED UNSUITABLE MATERIAL MUST BE TRANSPORTED TO AN APPROVED DISPOSAL LOCATION. 11) CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL SHORING REQUIRED DURING EXCAVATION AND SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH CURRENT OSHA STANDARDS, AS WELL AS ADDITIONAL PROVISIONS TO ASSURE STABILITY OF CONTIGUOUS STRUCTURES, AS FIELD CONDITIONS DICTATE. SIGN LEGEND: PROPOSED SPRINGBOARD CANOPY. PROPOSED DIGITAL PRE-BROWSE MENU BOARD. PROPOSED WELCOME POINT GATEWAY. PROPOSED OUTDOOR DIGITAL MENU BOARD (ODMB). *VERIFY SIGNAGE WITH SIGN ORDER REQUEST FORM. *VERIFY LOCATIONS WITH McDONALD'S REPRESENTATIVE. 1 2 3 4 SITE KEY NOTES: A. EXISTING 4,267 SF MCDONALDS BUILDING. REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR DETAILS. B. PROPOSED CONCRETE CURB. REFER TO CONSTRUCTION DETAIL SHEETS. C. PROPOSED ACCESSIBLE PARKING STRIPING. MUST BE LONG LIFE EPOXY. REFER TO CONSTRUCTION DETAIL SHEETS. D. PROPOSED PARKING STRIPING (TYP.). MUST BE LONG LIFE EPOXY. REFER TO CONSTRUCTION DETAIL SHEETS. E. PROPOSED CROSSWALK STRIPING. REFER TO CONSTRUCTION DETAIL SHEETS. F. PROPOSED ACCESSIBLE CURB RAMP WITH 3' DEEP DETECTABLE WARNING. REFER TO CONSTRUCTION DETAIL SHEETS. G. PROPOSED CONCRETE SIDEWALK. REFER TO CONSTRUCTION DETAIL SHEETS. H. DETECTOR LOOP(S) TO BE INSTALLED / REPLACED AT EXISTING DRIVE THRU WINDOWS AS DIRECTED BY MCDONALD’S CONSTRUCTION MANAGER. REFER TO CONSTRUCTION DETAIL SHEETS. I. PROPOSED GUARDRAIL. REFER TO CONSTRUCTION DETAIL SHEETS. J. PROPOSED YELLOW DRIVE-THRU DIRECTION PAVEMENT MARKINGS. REFER TO CONSTRUCTION DETAIL SHEETS. K. PROPOSED YELLOW PAINTED "DRIVE THRU" PAVEMENT MARKINGS. REFER TO CONSTRUCTION DETAIL SHEETS. L. PROPOSED 6" WIDE YELLOW PAINTED STRIPE. REFER TO CONSTRUCTION DETAIL SHEETS. M. PROPOSED YELLOW PAINTED "THANK YOU" PAVEMENT PARKING. REFER TO CONSTRUCTION DETAIL SHEETS. N. PROPOSED DIRECTIONAL SITE ARROWS. REFER TO CONSTRUCTION DETAIL SHEETS. O. PROPOSED ADA PARKING SIGN AND POST. P. PROPOSED WHEEL STOP. Q. PROPOSED LANDSCAPE AREA. R. APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF PROPOSED EVERGREEN TREES (TYP.). Exist i n g m a t u r e p i n e s # 4 9 2 t h r o u g h # 4 9 7 15475 Los Gatos Boulevard Tree Inventory, Assessment and Protection Report April 28, 2021 Tree Protection Typically there are three different tree protection schemes which are called Type I (Appendix D1), Type II and Type III (Appendix D2) trunk protection only. Tree protection focuses on avoiding damage to the roots, trunk, or scaffold branches (Appendix D). The most current accepted method for determining the TPZ is to use a formula based on species tolerance, tree age/vigor, and trunk diameter (Matheny, N. and Clark, J. 1998) (Fite, K, and Smiley, E. T., 2016). Preventing mechanical damage to the trunk from equipment or hand tools can be accomplished by wrapping the main stem with straw wattle or using vertical timbers (Appendix D). All the trees are located in the parking lot islands around the perimeter of the site. Re-striping and a top coat over the existing asphalt will not affect the trees. If necessary a temporary barrier could be placed around the site just off the curb to prevent ingress and egress into the planting areas. This may be unnecessary. For Canary Island pines #492 through #497 they would need to have their trunks protected during proposed renovation and care not to destroy the surface roots under the existing asphalt will be required. Conclusion The plans indicate a new traffic flow pattern through the parking lot to accommodate a drive through for the McDonalds restaurant. The inventory contains 46 trees comprised of 9 different species. One coast live oak is considered Large Protected and two olive trees are Exempt. Twenty trees are in good condition, twenty-two fair, one poor, one very poor, and two coast redwoods are dead.Trees in poor, very poor, or dead condition and a few Brazilian peppers are considered invasive plants and poorly suited for retention. The Canary Island pines and coast live oaks have good suitability while the coast redwoods fair. Six trees could be highly impacted by the proposed renovation and landscaping while the remaining trees around the parking lot will not be affected. There is limited detail provided on the extent of work around the six pines #492 through #497. The proposed landscape area “approximate location of proposed evergreen trees” already contains Canary Island pines #492 through #497. These are all healthy mature trees with roots extending into the existing parking lot. Adding a landscape area on grade may be possible, or extending the existing planting area and removing the asphalt, but the existing trees will not allow for extensive renovation or soil cutting in this area. No other detail was provided. All the trees are located in the parking lot islands around the perimeter of the site. Re-striping and a top coat over the existing asphalt will not affect the trees. For Canary Island pines #492 through #497 they would need to have their trunks protected during proposed renovation and care not to destroy the surface roots under the existing asphalt will be required. There were 46 trees appraised for a rounded depreciated value of $179,600.00. Monarch Consulting Arborists LLC - P.O Box 1010, Felton, CA 95018 831.331.8982 - rick@monarcharborist.com Page of 8 28 15475 Los Gatos Boulevard Tree Inventory, Assessment and Protection Report April 28, 2021 Recommendations 1.Produce a T-1 plan sheet to reflect the tree numbers provided in Appendix A and B of this report. 2.Maintain the current landscape and expand the planting bed adjacent to the Canary Island pines #492 through #497. 3.Protect the trunks of trees #492 through #497 by wrapping with wattle or bracing with timbers (Appendix D). 4.All tree maintenance and care shall be performed by a qualified arborist with a C-61/D-49 California Contractors License. Tree maintenance and care shall be specified in writing according to American National Standard for Tree Care Operations: Tree, Shrub and Other Woody Plant Management: Standard Practices parts 1 through 10 and adhere to ANSI Z133.1 safety standards and local regulations. All maintenance is to be performed according to ISA Best Management Practices. 5.Provide a copy of this report to all contractors and project managers, including the architect, civil engineer, and landscape designer or architect. It is the responsibility of the owner to ensure all parties are familiar with this document. 6.Arrange a pre-construction meeting with the project arborist or landscape architect to verify tree protection is in place, with the correct materials, and at the proper distances. Monarch Consulting Arborists LLC - P.O Box 1010, Felton, CA 95018 831.331.8982 - rick@monarcharborist.com Page of 9 28 15475 Los Gatos Boulevard Tree Inventory, Assessment and Protection Report April 28, 2021 Bibliography American National Standard for Tree Care Operations: Tree, Shrub and Other Woody Plant Management : Standard Practices (Management of Trees and Shrubs During Site Planning, Site Development, and Construction)(Part 5). Londonderry, NH: Secretariat, Tree Care Industry Association, 2019. Print. Fite, Kelby, and Edgar Thomas. Smiley. Managing trees during construction, second edition. Champaign, IL: International Society of Arboriculture, 2016. ISA. Guide For Plant Appraisal 9th Edition. Savoy, IL: International Society of Arboriculture, 2000. Print. ISA. Guide For Plant Appraisal 10th Edition. Savoy, IL: International Society of Arboriculture, 2018. Print. ISA. Species Classification and Group Assignment, 2004 Western Chapter Regional Supplement. Western Chapter ISA Matheny, Nelda P., Clark, James R. Trees and development: A technical guide to preservation of trees during land development. Bedminster, PA: International Society of Arboriculture 1998. Smiley, E, Matheny, N, Lilly, S, ISA. Best Management Practices: Tree Risk Assessment: International Society of Arboriculture, 2017. Print Monarch Consulting Arborists LLC - P.O Box 1010, Felton, CA 95018 831.331.8982 - rick@monarcharborist.com Page of 10 28 15475 Los Gatos Boulevard Tree Inventory, Assessment and Protection Report April 28, 2021 Glossary of Terms Basic Tree Cost: The cost of replacement for a perfect specimen of a particular species and cross sectional area prior to location and condition depreciation. Cost Approach: An indication of value by adding the land value to the depreciated value of improvements. Defect: An imperfection, weakness, or lack of something necessary. In trees defects are injuries, growth patterns, decay, or other conditions that reduce the tree’s structural strength. Diameter at breast height (DBH): Measures at 1.4 meters (4.5 feet) above ground in the United States, Australia (arboriculture), New Zealand, and when using the Guide for Plant Appraisal, 9th edition; at 1.3 meters (4.3 feet) above ground in Australia (forestry), Canada, the European Union, and in UK forestry; and at 1.5 meters (5 feet) above ground in UK arboriculture. Drip Line: Imaginary line defined by the branch spread or a single plant or group of plants. The outer extent of the tree crown. Form: describes a plant’s habit, shape or silhouette defined by its genetics, environment, or management. Health: Assessment is based on the overall appearance of the tree, its leaf and twig growth, and the presence and severity of insects or disease. Mechanical damage: Physical damage caused by outside forces such as cutting, chopping or any mechanized device that may strike the tree trunk, roots or branches. Scaffold branches: Permanent or structural branches that for the scaffold architecture or structure of a tree. Straw wattle: also known as straw worms, bio-logs, straw noodles, or straw tubes are man made cylinders of compressed, weed free straw (wheat or rice), 8 to 12 inches in diameter and 20 to 25 feet long. They are encased in jute, nylon, or other photo degradable materials, and have an average weight of 35 pounds. Monarch Consulting Arborists LLC - P.O Box 1010, Felton, CA 95018 831.331.8982 - rick@monarcharborist.com Page of 11 28 15475 Los Gatos Boulevard Tree Inventory, Assessment and Protection Report April 28, 2021 Structural evaluation: focused on the crown, trunk, trunk flare, above ground roots and the site conditions contributing to conditions and/or defects that may contribute to failure. Tree Protection Zone (TPZ): Defined area within which certain activities are prohibited or restricted to prevent or minimize potential injury to designated trees, especially during construction or development. Tree Risk Assessment: Process of evaluating what unexpected things could happen, how likely it is, and what the likely outcomes are. In tree management, the systematic process to determine the level of risk posed by a tree, tree part, or group of trees. Trunk: Stem of a tree. Trunk Formula Technique: Method to appraise the monetary value of trees considered too large to be replaced with nursery or field grown stock. Based on developing a representative unit cost for replacement with the same or comparable species of the same size and in the same place, subject to depreciation for various factors. Contrast with replacement cost method. Volunteer: A tree, not planted by human hands, that begins to grow on residential or commercial property. Unlike trees that are brought in and installed on property, volunteer trees usually spring up on their own from seeds placed onto the ground by natural causes or accidental transport by people. Normally, volunteer trees are considered weeds and removed, but many desirable and attractive specimens have gone on to become permanent residents on many public and private grounds. Monarch Consulting Arborists LLC - P.O Box 1010, Felton, CA 95018 831.331.8982 - rick@monarcharborist.com Page of 12 28 15475 Los Gatos Boulevard Tree Inventory, Assessment and Protection Report April 28, 2021 Appendix A: Tree Inventory Map and Site Plan Monarch Consulting Arborists LLC - P.O Box 1010, Felton, CA 95018 831.331.8982 - rick@monarcharborist.com Page of 13 28LOS GATOS ROADYOU THA N K THRUDRIVETHRUDRIVETHRUDRIVE60'NO PARKINGNO PARKING15' FRONT BUILDING SETBACK 3 2 2 4 7 5 4 3 9 7 8 7 16 20' 15' 5.75' 5.75'10'15'23.67'12'9'2 3 . 3 5 ' R20' R30' R45' R2' R10' R5' R5' R3'9'8'9'9'9'8'9'18'5'3.6'35°'35°'15' 50°' R3.5' 6' 5'20.23 ' 99.8'61.01'156. 9 1 '61.13'R5'5'18' 9'23.33'1 1 2 3 4 4 A B B B B C C C C D D D E E F F F F G GG G H H I J J K J J J K J K M L N N N N N N P O O O O D B6'6'5'6'6'5'7' 5' 5' J J J J J R3' R3' Q QR 1 A 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 B C D E F G H I DOCUMENTS PREPARED BY CORESTATES, INC., INCLUDING THIS DOCUMENT, ARE TO BE USED ONLY FOR THE SPECIFIC PROJECT AND SPECIFIC USE FOR WHICH THEY WERE INTENDED. ANY EXTENSION OF USE TO ANY OTHER PROJECTS, BY OWNER OR BY ANY OTHER PARTY, WITHOUT THE EXPRESSED WRITTEN CONSENT OF CORESTATES, INC. IS DONE UNLAWFULLY AND AT THE USERS OWN RISK. IF USED IN A WAY OTHER THAN THAT SPECIFICALLY INTENDED, USER WILL HOLD CORESTATES, INC. HARMLESS FROM ALL CLAIMS AND LOSSES. Drawing: P:\McDonalds\MRP\Los Gatos, CA (15475 Los Gatos Blvd) 004-0582 -MCD.30686\CIVIL\Drawings\Concepts - Exhibits\MCD.30686 PSP.dwg ;Layout1Plot Date/Time: Feb. 16, 21 - 17:05:27User: KPETRI SITE LOCATION ENGINEER SEAL DOCUMENT REVISIONS REV DATE COMMENT BY CLIENT CHECKED BY: SHEET NO. JOB #: SCALE: DRAWN BY: DATE: SHEET TITLE THE CONTRACTOR IS SPECIFICALLY CAUTIONED THAT THE LOCATION AND/ORELEVATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES AS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS IS BASED ON DESIGN DRAWINGS, RECORDS OF THE VARIOUS UTILITY COMPANIES, AND WHERE POSSIBLE, MEASUREMENTS TAKEN IN THE FIELD. CORE STATES, INC. DOES NOT GUARANTEETHAT LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE EXACT. THE CONTRACTOR MUST CONTACT THE APPROPRIATE UTILITY COMPANIES AT LEAST 72 HOURS BEFORE ANY EXCAVATION TO REQUEST EXACT FIELD LOCATIONS OF UTILITIES. &DOOEHIRUH\RXGLJEHORZ.QRZZKDW V 4240 East Jurupa Street, Suite 402Ontario, CA 91761Phone (909) 467-8919Bhumann@core-states.comMCD.30686 11/13/2020 KP ZM 15475 LOS GATOS BLVD, LOS GATOS, CA 95032 1" = 20' 0 2010205 GRAPHIC SCALE PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN PSP 1" = 20' SITE LEGEND EXISTING PROPERTY BOUNDARY LINE EXISTING ADJOINING PROPERTY LINE PROPOSED CURB PROPOSED DEPRESSED CURB PROPOSED SIDEWALK PROPOSED CONCRETE PROPOSED PARKING COUNT PROPOSED BUILDING PROPOSED ASPHALT PROPOSED CURB AND GUTTER EXISTING UTILITY EASEMENT EXISTING EDGE OF PAVEMENT EXISTING WATER STRUCTURE EXISTING SANITARY STRUCTURES =< EXISTING CURB AND GUTTER EXISTING STORMWATER STRUCTURES SPILL GUTTER D XX S PP EXISTING ELECTRIC STRUCTURE GENERAL NOTES: APPLICANT/OWNER:MCDONALD'S CORPORATION 2527 CAMINO RAMON ST. 300 SAN RAMON, CA 94583 1) SITE ADDRESS:15475 LOS GATOS ROAD LOS GATOS, CA 95032 SANTA CLARA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA 2) A.P.N.424-19-065 3) ZONING DATA: 29.60.420 ZONED: CH - HIGHWAY COMMERCIAL EXISTING USE: RESTAURANT PROPOSED USE: RESTAURANT (PERMITTED) REQUIRED EXISTING PROPOSED MIN. LOT AREA:N/A 1.334 AC.1.334 AC N/A (58,125 S.F.)(58,125 S.F.) MIN. LOT FRONTAGE: N/A 195.03'195.03' MIN. LOT WIDTH:N/A 301.65'301.65' MIN. FRONT YARD: 15'99.80' (E) 99.80' (E) MIN. SIDE YARD:0'61.01' (S)61.01' (S) 61.13' (N)61.13' (N) MIN. REAR YARD:0'156.91' (W)156.91' (W) MAX. IMPERVIOUS SURFACE:N/A 79.56%78.46% (46,244 S.F.)(46,607 S.F.) MAX. HEIGHT:35'16'-1"16'-1" 4) PARKING REQUIREMENTS: 29.10.150 1 SPACE PER 235 SQUARE FEET OF NET PUBLIC AREA. 4,267 S.F. X (1/235) = 19 SPACES REQUIRED = 19 SPACES EXISTING McDONALD'S AREA PARKING: 92 SPACES (INCLUDING 4 ACCESSIBLE SPACES) PROPOSED McDONALD'S AREA PARKING: 77 SPACES (INCLUDING 4 ACCESSIBLE SPACES) PARKING STALL DIMENSIONS: EXISTING: VARIES REQUIRED: 9'X18' PROPOSED: 9'X18' 4) ALL EXISTING FEATURES ARE TO REMAIN UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 5) ALL PAVEMENT MARKINGS SHALL BE LONG LIFE EPOXY. 6) PRIOR TO STARTING CONSTRUCTION, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE TO MAKE SURE THAT ALL REQUIRED PERMITS AND APPROVALS HAVE BEEN OBTAINED. NO CONSTRUCTION OR FABRICATION SHALL BEGIN UNTIL THE CONTRACTOR HAS RECEIVED AND THOROUGHLY REVIEWED ALL PLANS AND OTHER DOCUMENTS BY ALL OF THE PERMITTING AUTHORITIES. 7) ALL WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THESE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND THE REQUIREMENTS AND STANDARDS OF THE LOCAL GOVERNING AUTHORITY. 8) ALL DIMENSIONS SHOWN ON THE PLANS SHALL BE FIELD VERIFIED BY THE CONTRACTOR PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY ENGINEER IF ANY DISCREPANCIES EXIST PRIOR TO PROCEEDING WITH CONSTRUCTION FOR NECESSARY PLAN CHANGES. NO EXTRA COMPENSATION SHALL BE PAID TO THE CONTRACTOR FOR WORK HAVING TO BE REDONE DUE TO DIMENSIONS OR GRADES SHOWN INCORRECTLY ON THESE PLANS IF SUCH NOTIFICATION HAS NOT BEEN GIVEN. 9) SOLID WASTE TO BE DISPOSED OF BY CONTRACTOR IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL LOCAL, STATE AND FEDERAL REGULATIONS. 10) ALL EXCAVATED UNSUITABLE MATERIAL MUST BE TRANSPORTED TO AN APPROVED DISPOSAL LOCATION. 11) CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL SHORING REQUIRED DURING EXCAVATION AND SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH CURRENT OSHA STANDARDS, AS WELL AS ADDITIONAL PROVISIONS TO ASSURE STABILITY OF CONTIGUOUS STRUCTURES, AS FIELD CONDITIONS DICTATE. SIGN LEGEND: PROPOSED SPRINGBOARD CANOPY. PROPOSED DIGITAL PRE-BROWSE MENU BOARD. PROPOSED WELCOME POINT GATEWAY. PROPOSED OUTDOOR DIGITAL MENU BOARD (ODMB). *VERIFY SIGNAGE WITH SIGN ORDER REQUEST FORM. *VERIFY LOCATIONS WITH McDONALD'S REPRESENTATIVE. 1 2 3 4 SITE KEY NOTES: A. EXISTING 4,267 SF MCDONALDS BUILDING. REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR DETAILS. B. PROPOSED CONCRETE CURB. REFER TO CONSTRUCTION DETAIL SHEETS. C. PROPOSED ACCESSIBLE PARKING STRIPING. MUST BE LONG LIFE EPOXY. REFER TO CONSTRUCTION DETAIL SHEETS. D. PROPOSED PARKING STRIPING (TYP.). MUST BE LONG LIFE EPOXY. REFER TO CONSTRUCTION DETAIL SHEETS. E. PROPOSED CROSSWALK STRIPING. REFER TO CONSTRUCTION DETAIL SHEETS. F. PROPOSED ACCESSIBLE CURB RAMP WITH 3' DEEP DETECTABLE WARNING. REFER TO CONSTRUCTION DETAIL SHEETS. G. PROPOSED CONCRETE SIDEWALK. REFER TO CONSTRUCTION DETAIL SHEETS. H. DETECTOR LOOP(S) TO BE INSTALLED / REPLACED AT EXISTING DRIVE THRU WINDOWS AS DIRECTED BY MCDONALD’S CONSTRUCTION MANAGER. REFER TO CONSTRUCTION DETAIL SHEETS. I. PROPOSED GUARDRAIL. REFER TO CONSTRUCTION DETAIL SHEETS. J. PROPOSED YELLOW DRIVE-THRU DIRECTION PAVEMENT MARKINGS. REFER TO CONSTRUCTION DETAIL SHEETS. K. PROPOSED YELLOW PAINTED "DRIVE THRU" PAVEMENT MARKINGS. REFER TO CONSTRUCTION DETAIL SHEETS. L. PROPOSED 6" WIDE YELLOW PAINTED STRIPE. REFER TO CONSTRUCTION DETAIL SHEETS. M. PROPOSED YELLOW PAINTED "THANK YOU" PAVEMENT PARKING. REFER TO CONSTRUCTION DETAIL SHEETS. N. PROPOSED DIRECTIONAL SITE ARROWS. REFER TO CONSTRUCTION DETAIL SHEETS. O. PROPOSED ADA PARKING SIGN AND POST. P. PROPOSED WHEEL STOP. Q. PROPOSED LANDSCAPE AREA. R. APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF PROPOSED EVERGREEN TREES (TYP.). 462 463464 483484 485 486487488 497 493 496 494495 492 491490 489 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 8214 8215 482 481 480 — T h r o u g h — 4 6 5 15475 Los Gatos Boulevard Tree Inventory, Assessment and Protection Report April 28, 2021 Appendix B: Tree Inventory and Assessment Tables Table 1 Tree Species I.D. #Trunk Diameter (in.) ~ Canopy Diameter (ft.) Condition Suitability for Preservation Expected Impact Status Rounded Depreciated Value Canary island pine (Pinus canariensis) 462 22 35 Fair Good Low Protected $4,810.00 Canary island pine (Pinus canariensis) 463 20 35 Good Good Low Protected $5,600.00 Canary island pine (Pinus canariensis) 464 23 35 Good Good Low Protected $7,400.00 Brazilian pepper (Schinus terebinthifolius) 465 7, 4, 4 20 Fair Poor Low Protected $490.00 Brazilian pepper (Schinus terebinthifolius) 466 10 20 Fair Poor Low Protected $600.00 Brazilian pepper (Schinus terebinthifolius) 467 4,3, 2 20 Fair Poor Low Protected $150.00 Xylosma (Xylosma congestum)468 8 20 Fair Fair Low Protected $640.00 Brazilian pepper (Schinus terebinthifolius) 469 7, 5, 9, 4 20 Fair Poor Low Protected $1,020.00 Xylosma (Xylosma congestum)470 4 20 Fair Fair Low Protected $160.00 Xylosma (Xylosma congestum)471 7, 4,5 20 Fair Fair Low Protected $810.00 coast redwood (Sequoia sempervirens) 472 16 20 Very poor Poor Low Protected $480.00 coast live oak (Quercus agrifolia)473 9, 12 20 Good Good Low Protected $3,130.00 Monarch Consulting Arborists LLC - P.O Box 1010, Felton, CA 95018 831.331.8982 - rick@monarcharborist.com Page of 14 28 15475 Los Gatos Boulevard Tree Inventory, Assessment and Protection Report April 28, 2021 coast redwood (Sequoia sempervirens) 474 28 20 Good Good Low Protected $6,800.00 Xylosma (Xylosma congestum)475 3, 2 20 Fair Fair Low Protected $160.00 Xylosma (Xylosma congestum)476 10 20 Fair Fair Low Protected $1,000.00 Xylosma (Xylosma congestum)477 9 20 Fair Fair Low Protected $810.00 Xylosma (Xylosma congestum)478 6 20 Fair Fair Low Protected $360.00 Xylosma (Xylosma congestum)479 8 20 Fair Fair Low Protected $640.00 Xylosma (Xylosma congestum)480 6 20 Fair Fair Low Protected $360.00 coast redwood (Sequoia sempervirens) 481 15 20 Fair Fair Low Protected $1,390.00 coast live oak (Quercus agrifolia)482 15, 13 35 Fair Good Low Large Protected $3,980.00 coast redwood (Sequoia sempervirens) 483 15 20 Fair Fair Low Protected $1,390.00 coast redwood (Sequoia sempervirens) 484 14 20 Fair Fair Low Protected $1,210.00 Aleppo pine (Pinus halapensis)485 30 35 Fair Fair Low Protected $7,000.00 coast redwood (Sequoia sempervirens) 486 15 20 Good Fair Low Protected $1,950.00 coast redwood (Sequoia sempervirens) 487 23 20 Good Fair Low Protected $4,580.00 Tree Species I.D. #Trunk Diameter (in.) ~ Canopy Diameter (ft.) Condition Suitability for Preservation Expected Impact Status Rounded Depreciated Value Monarch Consulting Arborists LLC - P.O Box 1010, Felton, CA 95018 831.331.8982 - rick@monarcharborist.com Page of 15 28 15475 Los Gatos Boulevard Tree Inventory, Assessment and Protection Report April 28, 2021 coast redwood (Sequoia sempervirens) 488 17 20 Good Fair Low Protected $2,500.00 coast redwood (Sequoia sempervirens) 489 20 20 Dead Fair Low Protected $0.00 coast live oak (Quercus agrifolia)490 12 25 Good Good Low Protected $2,010.00 coast redwood (Sequoia sempervirens) 491 18 20 Dead Poor Low Protected $0.00 Canary island pine (Pinus canariensis) 492 22 30 Good Good Moderate -High Protected $6,700.00 Canary island pine (Pinus canariensis) 493 11 20 Good Good Moderate -High Protected $1,680.00 Canary island pine (Pinus canariensis) 494 27 30 Good Good Moderate -High Protected $10,200.00 Canary island pine (Pinus canariensis) 495 26.5 30 Good Good Moderate -High Protected $9,800.00 Canary island pine (Pinus canariensis) 496 25.5 30 Good Good Moderate -High Protected $9,100.00 Canary island pine (Pinus canariensis) 497 31 30 Good Good Moderate -High Protected $13,400.00 coast redwood (Sequoia sempervirens) 498 7 10 Good Good Low Protected $420.00 coast redwood (Sequoia sempervirens) 499 28 35 Good Good Low Protected $6,800.00 coast redwood (Sequoia sempervirens) 500 33 35 Good Good Low Protected $9,400.00 Tree Species I.D. #Trunk Diameter (in.) ~ Canopy Diameter (ft.) Condition Suitability for Preservation Expected Impact Status Rounded Depreciated Value Monarch Consulting Arborists LLC - P.O Box 1010, Felton, CA 95018 831.331.8982 - rick@monarcharborist.com Page of 16 28 15475 Los Gatos Boulevard Tree Inventory, Assessment and Protection Report April 28, 2021 coast redwood (Sequoia sempervirens) 501 29 35 Good Good Low Protected $7,300.00 olive (Olea europaea)502 11, 11 15 Fair Poor Low Exempt $2,240.00 incense cedar (Calocedrus decurrens) 503 46 35 Good Fair Low Protected $22,900.00 coast redwood (Sequoia sempervirens) 504 36 35 Good Good Low Protected $11,200.00 olive (Olea europaea)505 7, 9, 9 15 Poor Poor Low Exempt $1,340.00 London plane (Platanus x hispanica)8214 15.5 30 Fair Good Low Street Tree $2,390.00 London plane (Platanus x hispanica)8215 18.5 30 Fair Good Low Street Tree $3,400.00 Tree Species I.D. #Trunk Diameter (in.) ~ Canopy Diameter (ft.) Condition Suitability for Preservation Expected Impact Status Rounded Depreciated Value Monarch Consulting Arborists LLC - P.O Box 1010, Felton, CA 95018 831.331.8982 - rick@monarcharborist.com Page of 17 28 15475 Los Gatos Boulevard Tree Inventory, Assessment and Protection Report April 28, 2021 Appendix C: Photographs C1: Canary island pines 492 to 497 Monarch Consulting Arborists LLC - P.O Box 1010, Felton, CA 95018 831.331.8982 - rick@monarcharborist.com Page of 18 28 15475 Los Gatos Boulevard Tree Inventory, Assessment and Protection Report April 28, 2021 C2: Dead redwoods 489 and 491 Monarch Consulting Arborists LLC - P.O Box 1010, Felton, CA 95018 831.331.8982 - rick@monarcharborist.com Page of 19 28 15475 Los Gatos Boulevard Tree Inventory, Assessment and Protection Report April 28, 2021 Appendix D: Tree Protection Guidelines D1: Plan Sheet Detail S-X (Type I)
 Monarch Consulting Arborists LLC - P.O Box 1010, Felton, CA 95018 831.331.8982 - rick@monarcharborist.com Page of 20 28 TREE PROTECTION Crown drip line or other limit of Tree Protection area. See tree preservation plan for fence alignment.4'-0"Maintain existing grade with the tree protection fence unless otherwise indicated on the plans. 2" x 6' steel posts or approved equal. Tree Protection fence: High density polyethylene fencing with 3.5" x 1.5" openings; Color- orange. Steel posts installed at 8' o.c. 5" thick layer of mulch. Notes: 1- See specifications for additional tree protection requirements. 2- If there is no existing irrigation, see specifications for watering requirements. 3- No pruning shall be performed except by approved arborist. 4- No equipment shall operate inside the protective fencing including during fence installation and removal. 5- See site preparation plan for any modifications with the Tree Protection area. SECTION VIEW KEEP OUT TREE PROTECTION AREA 8.5" x 11" sign laminated in plastic spaced every 50' along the fence. URBAN TREE FOUNDATION © 2014 OPEN SOURCE FREE TO USE Tree protection fence: Fencing shall be comprised of six- foot high chain link mounted on eight- foot tall, 1 7/8-inch diameter galvanized posts, driven 24 inches into the ground. Minimum 4” thick mulch layer Crown diameter drip line distance equal to the outer most limit of foliage.Notes: •All tree maintenance and care shall be performed by a qualified arborist with a C-61/D-49 California Contractors License. Tree maintenance and care shall be specified in writing according to American National Standard for Tree Care Operations: Tree, Shrub and Other Woody Plant Management: Standard Practices parts 1 through 10 and adhere to ANSI Z133.1 safety standards and local regulations. •All maintenance is to be performed according to ISA Best Management Practices. Notes: The Tree Protection Zone (TPZ) may vary in radius from the trunk and may or may not be established at the drip line distance. See arborist’s report and plan sheet for specifications of TPZ radii.6’-0”Modified by Monarch Consulting Arborists LLC, 2019 15475 Los Gatos Boulevard Tree Inventory, Assessment and Protection Report April 28, 2021 D2: Plan Sheet Detail S-Y (Type III)
 Monarch Consulting Arborists LLC - P.O Box 1010, Felton, CA 95018 831.331.8982 - rick@monarcharborist.com Page of 21 28EVCHARGINGONLYEVCHARGINGONLYNOPARKINGNOPARKINGCLEAN AIRVAN POOLE.V.CLEAN AIRVAN POOLE.V.CLEAN AIRVAN POOLE.V.327 328 329329327328E1E1E1E5E5AE5CC ?W ?W ?WPLANTING PLAN BYJONI JANECKI & ASSOCIATESSEE LIBRARY PLANS GUSHEE STREET PLANTING PLAN BYJONI JANECKI & ASSOCIATESSEE LIBRARY PLANSPLANTING PLAN BYJONI JANECKI & ASSOCIATESSEE LIBRARY PLANSPARKING AND BUILDING BYTEALL MESSER ARCHITECTSEE LIBRARY PLANS PLANTING PLAN BYJONI JANECKI & ASSOCIATESSEE LIBRARY PLANSLIBRARY LANDSCAPE PLAN BYJONI JANECKI & ASSOCIATES L.O.W.L.O.W.L.O.W.L.O.W.L.O.W.L.O.W.L.O.W.L.O.W.L.O.W.L.O.W.L.O.W.L.O.W.BULL CREEK FLOWLINEFUTURELIBRARY XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX X X X X X X X X X X X KIRBY STREETXXXSEE L2.0 MATERIALS PLAN FOR DISCOVERY PARKIMPROVEMENTSSEE L2.0 MATERIALS PLAN FOR DISCOVERY PARKIMPROVEMENTS (E) CHAINLINK FENCE AND GATE TO REMAIN APPROXIMATE LIMIT OF WORK (L.O.W.)LEGEND (E) TREE TO BE PROTECTED(E) TREE TO REMAINNOTE:1. SEE C3.0 EROSION CONTROL PLAN FOR TREEPROTECTION IN EXISTING RIPARIAN AREA.2. TREE SURVEY PROVIDED BY IFLAND SURVEY, 10/09/18.3. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT ALL TREES WHICH ARELOCATED WITHIN 10' OF EQUIPMENT MOVEMENT.1L1.0(E) FENCE TO BE REMOVEDARBORIST NOTES:1. ALL TREE MAINTENANCE AND CARE SHALL BEPERFORMED BY A QUALIFIED ARBORIST WITH AC-61/D-49 CALIFORNIA CONTRACTORS LICENSE. TREEMAINTENANCE AND CARE SHALL BE SPECIFIED INWRITING ACCORDING TO AMERICAN NATIONALSTANDARD FOR TREE CARE OPERATIONS: TREE, SHRUBAND OTHER WOODY PLANT MANAGEMENT: STANDARDPRACTICES PARTS 1 THROUGH 10 AND ADHERE TO ANSIZ133.1 SAFETY STANDARDS AND LOCAL REGULATIONS.ALL MAINTENANCE IS TO BE PERFORMED ACCORDINGTO ISA BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES.2.TREE PRUNING - IF TREE PRUNING FOR OVERHEAD CLEARANCE IS REQUIRED OR NECESSARY PRUNING SPECIFICATIONS SHALL BE IN WRITING PRIOR TO ANY CUTTING. CUTTING SHALL BE PERFORMED BY A QUALIFIED TREE CARE PROFESSIONAL OR SUPERVISED BY THE PROJECT ARBORIST. NO LIMBS GREATER THAN FOUR INCHES (4”) IN DIAMETER SHALL BE REMOVED WITHOUT APPROVAL. 3.ROOT MANAGEMENT - PRIOR TO REMOVING ROOTS GREATER THAN TWO INCHES (2”) IN DIAMETER EACH TREE SHALL BE EVALUATED BY THE PROJECT ARBORIST TO HELP DETERMINE ITS LIKELIHOOD OF FAILURE AFTER ROOT LOSS. IF ROOTS OVER TWO INCHES IN DIAMETER ARE ENCOUNTERED THEY SHOULD BE PRUNED BY HAND WITH LOPPERS, HANDSAW, RECIPROCATING SAW, OR CHAIN SAW RATHER THAN LEFT CRUSHED OR TORN. ROOTS SHOULD BE CUT BEYOND SINKER ROOTS OR OUTSIDE ROOT BRANCH JUNCTIONS AND BE SUPERVISED BY THE PROJECT ARBORIST. WHEN COMPLETED, EXPOSED ROOTS SHOULD BE KEPT MOIST WITH BURLAP OR BACKFILLED WITHIN ONE HOUR. NO ROOTS SHALL BE CUT WITHIN SIX TIMES THE TRUNK DIAMETER DISTANCE IN FEET ON ONE SIDE WITHOUT ARBORIST APPROVAL. 4.TRUNK PROTECTION - PREVENTING MECHANICAL DAMAGE TO THE MAIN STEMS FROM EQUIPMENT OR HAND TOOLS CAN BE ACCOMPLISHED BY WRAPPING THE MAIN STEM WITH STRAW WATTLE. 5.SITE OCCUPANCY - HAVE A QUALIFIED ARBORIST PERFORM A LEVEL 2: BASIC TREE RISK ASSESSMENT AS DESCRIBED IN BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES: TREE RISK ASSESSMENT: INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY OF ARBORICULTURE, 2017 TO HELP IDENTIFY ANY NEW RISK FACTORS AFTER CONSTRUCTION UPON NEW SITE OCCUPANCY. DEMOLITION AND TREE PROTECTION PLAN L1.0 1"= 20' LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTBASE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTUREPROJECT TEAMPROJECT NAME & ADDRESSFELTON LIBRARYDISCOVERY PARKGUSHEE STREETFELTON, CA, 95018REVISION#Date Description STAMP SHEET TITLE Scale: Date: Drawn by: Checked by: Project No.: PHASE BID SET No. 5579 Ren. 9/30/2020LICENSED A R CHI TECTST A TEOF CA L IF O RNIAAL E N DA CS P 1802 PA / AS NM 04/19/2019 CIVIL ENGINEERMME CIVIL + STRUCTURAL ENGINEERINGSAN FRANCISCO / PORTLANDwww.baselandscape.comIRRIGATION DESIGNRMA IRRIGATIONCLIENTSANTA CRUZ COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PARKS,OPEN SPACE, AND CULTURAL SERVICES 0 feet40 1" = 20' 20 60 80 NORTHSECTION TREE TRUNK 12" Ø STRAW FILLED BURLAP WATTLES TREE PROTECTION WITHOUT FENCE 3/8" = 1'-0"4'-0"ROOT PROTECTION ZONE. SEE SPECS FOR REQUIREMENTS 1 SCHEDULE TREES TO BE PROTECTED: 20 TREES TO BE REMOVED: 0 04-19-20191 Planning Review Comments1 SECTION VIEW TRUNK PROTECTION WITH WATTLES-Y 6’-0” Excavation Trenches: 1. When any roots are cut or torn during construction, it is critical that you sharply cut all the ends of any exposed roots immediately. Failure to do so will leave crushed and torn roots. This leads to decay and inhibits growth of new roots. 2. Pile soil on the side of the trench opposite the tree. If this is not possible, place the soil on a plastic tarp, plywood or a thick bed of mulch. 3. Do not compact the backfill on the trench more than its original firmness. 4. Water the backfill to allow the roots to begin healing. Trenching near a tree can kill as much as 40%-50% of the tree’s roots. If the tree you are working around is in a confined space and your equipment will be coming close, it is important for you to protect the trunk. Wrap the tree trunk in old tires or place 2” x 4” studs around the tree and rope or band them together. ROOT PRUNING DETAIL PLEASE KEEP THIS SHEET FOR REFERENCE IMAGE 2: BRACING WITH TIMBERS 15475 Los Gatos Boulevard Tree Inventory, Assessment and Protection Report April 28, 2021 D3: Section 29.10.1005. - Protection of Trees During Construction Tree Protection Zones and Fence Specifications   1.Size and materials: Six (6) foot high chain link fencing, mounted on two-inch diameter galvanized iron posts, shall be driven into the ground to a depth of at least two (2) feet at no more than ten-foot spacing. For paving area that will not be demolished and when stipulated in a tree preservation plan, posts may be supported by a concrete base. 2.Area type to be fenced: Type I: Enclosure with chain link fencing of either the entire dripline area or at the tree protection zone (TPZ), when specified by a certified or consulting arborist. Type II: Enclosure for street trees located in a planter strip: chain link fence around the entire planter strip to the outer branches. Type III: Protection for a tree located in a small planter cutout only (such as downtown): orange plastic fencing shall be wrapped around the trunk from the ground to the first branch with two-inch wooden boards bound securely on the outside. Caution shall be used to avoid damaging any bark or branches. 3.Duration of Type I, II, III fencing: Fencing shall be erected before demolition, grading or construction permits are issued and remain in place until the work is completed. Contractor shall first obtain the approval of the project arborist on record prior to removing a tree protection fence. 4.Warning Sign: Each tree fence shall have prominently displayed an eight and one-half-inch by eleven-inch sign stating: "Warning —Tree Protection Zone—This fence shall not be removed and is subject to penalty according to Town Code 29.10.1025.” Text on the signs should be in both English and Spanish (Appendix E). 
 Monarch Consulting Arborists LLC - P.O Box 1010, Felton, CA 95018 831.331.8982 - rick@monarcharborist.com Page of 22 28 15475 Los Gatos Boulevard Tree Inventory, Assessment and Protection Report April 28, 2021 All persons, shall comply with the following precautions 1.Prior to the commencement of construction, install the fence at the dripline, or tree protection zone (TPZ) when specified in an approved arborist report, around any tree and/or vegetation to be retained which could be affected by the construction and prohibit any storage of construction materials or other materials, equipment cleaning, or parking of vehicles within the TPZ. The dripline shall not be altered in any way so as to increase the encroachment of the construction. 2.Prohibit all construction activities within the TPZ, including but not limited to: excavation, grading, drainage and leveling within the dripline of the tree unless approved by the Director. 3.Prohibit disposal or depositing of oil, gasoline, chemicals or other harmful materials within the dripline of or in drainage channels, swales or areas that may lead to the dripline of a protected tree. 4.Prohibit the attachment of wires, signs or ropes to any protected tree. 5.Design utility services and irrigation lines to be located outside of the dripline when feasible. 6.Retain the services of a certified or consulting arborist who shall serve as the project arborist for periodic monitoring of the project site and the health of those trees to be preserved. The project arborist shall be present whenever activities occur which may pose a potential threat to the health of the trees to be preserved and shall document all site visits. 7.The Director and project arborist shall be notified of any damage that occurs to a protected tree during construction so that proper treatment may be administered. Prohibited Activities The following are prohibited activities within the TPZ: •Grade changes (e.g. soil cuts, fills); •Trenches; •Root cuts; •Pedestrian and equipment traffic that could compact the soil or physically damage roots; •Parking vehicles or equipment; •Burning of brush and woody debris; •Storing soil, construction materials, petroleum products, water, or building refuse; and, •Disposing of wash water, fuel or other potentially damaging liquids. Monarch Consulting Arborists LLC - P.O Box 1010, Felton, CA 95018 831.331.8982 - rick@monarcharborist.com Page of 23 28 15475 Los Gatos Boulevard Tree Inventory, Assessment and Protection Report April 28, 2021 Monitoring Any trenching, construction or demolition that is expected to damage or encounter tree roots should be monitored by the project arborist or a qualified ISA Certified Arborist and should be documented. The site should be evaluated by the project arborist or a qualified ISA Certified Arborist after construction is complete, and any necessary remedial work that needs to be performed should be noted. Root Pruning Roots greater than two inches in diameter shall not be cut. When roots over two inches in diameter are encountered and are authorized to be cut or removed, they should be pruned by hand with loppers, handsaw, reciprocating saw, or chain saw rather than left crushed or torn. Roots should be cut beyond sinker roots or outside root branch junctions and be supervised by the project arborist. When completed, exposed roots should be kept moist with burlap or backfilled within one hour. Boring or Tunneling Boring machines should be set up outside the drip line or established Tree Protection Zone. Boring may also be performed by digging a trench on both sides of the tree until roots one inch in diameter are encountered and then hand dug or excavated with an Air Spade® or similar air or water excavation tool. Bore holes should be adjacent to the trunk and never go directly under the main stem to avoid oblique (heart) roots. Bore holes should be a minimum of three feet deep. Tree Pruning and Removal Operations All tree pruning or removals should be performed by a qualified arborist with a C-61/D-49 California Contractors License. Treatment, including pruning, shall be specified in writing according to the most recent ANSI A-300A Standards and Limitations and performed according to ISA Best Management Practices while adhering to ANSI Z133.1 safety standards. Trees that need to be removed or pruned should be identified in the pre-construction walk through. Monarch Consulting Arborists LLC - P.O Box 1010, Felton, CA 95018 831.331.8982 - rick@monarcharborist.com Page of 24 28 15475 Los Gatos Boulevard Tree Inventory, Assessment and Protection Report April 28, 2021 Appendix E: Tree Protection Signs E1: English
 Monarch Consulting Arborists LLC - P.O Box 1010, Felton, CA 95018 831.331.8982 - rick@monarcharborist.com Page of 25 28 Warning Tree Protection Zone This Fence Shall Not Be Removed And Is Subject To Penalty According To Town Code 29.10.1025 15475 Los Gatos Boulevard Tree Inventory, Assessment and Protection Report April 28, 2021 E2: Spanish Monarch Consulting Arborists LLC - P.O Box 1010, Felton, CA 95018 831.331.8982 - rick@monarcharborist.com Page of 26 28 Cuidado Zona De Arbol Pretejido Esta valla no podrán ser sacados Y está sujeta a sanción en función de Código Ciudad del 29.101025 15475 Los Gatos Boulevard Tree Inventory, Assessment and Protection Report April 28, 2021 Qualifications, Assumptions, and Limiting Conditions Any legal description provided to the consultant is assumed to be correct. Any titles or ownership of properties are assumed to be good and marketable. All property is appraised or evaluated as though free and clear, under responsible ownership and competent management. All property is presumed to be in conformance with applicable codes, ordinances, statutes, or other regulations. Care has been taken to obtain information from reliable sources. However, the consultant cannot be responsible for the accuracy of information provided by others. The consultant shall not be required to give testimony or attend meetings, hearings, conferences, mediations, arbitration, or trials by reason of this report unless subsequent contractual arrangements are made, including payment of an additional fee for such services. This report and any appraisal value expressed herein represent the opinion of the consultant, and the consultant’s fee is not contingent upon the reporting of a specified appraisal value, a stipulated result, or the occurrence of a subsequent event. Sketches, drawings, and photographs in this report are intended for use as visual aids, are not necessarily to scale, and should not be construed as engineering or architectural reports or surveys. The reproduction of information generated by architects, engineers, or other consultants on any sketches, drawings, or photographs is only for coordination and ease of reference. Inclusion of said information with any drawings or other documents does not constitute a representation as to the sufficiency or accuracy of said information. Unless otherwise expressed: a) this report covers only examined items and their condition at the time of inspection; and b) the inspection is limited to visual examination of accessible items without dissection, excavation, probing, or coring. There is no warranty or guarantee, expressed or implied, that structural problems or deficiencies of plants or property may not arise in the future. Monarch Consulting Arborists LLC - P.O Box 1010, Felton, CA 95018 831.331.8982 - rick@monarcharborist.com Page of 27 28 15475 Los Gatos Boulevard Tree Inventory, Assessment and Protection Report April 28, 2021 Certification of Performance I Richard Gessner, Certify: That I have personally inspected the tree(s) and/or the property referred to in this report, and have stated my findings accurately. The extent of the evaluation and/or appraisal is stated in the attached report and Terms of Assignment; That I have no current or prospective interest in the vegetation or the property that is the subject of this report, and I have no personal interest or bias with respect to the parties involved; That the analysis, opinions and conclusions stated herein are my own; That my analysis, opinions, and conclusions were developed and this report has been prepared according to commonly accepted Arboricultural practices; That no one provided significant professional assistance to the consultant, except as indicated within the report. That my compensation is not contingent upon the reporting of a predetermined conclusion that favors the cause of the client or any other party, nor upon the results of the assessment, the attainment of stipulated results, or the occurrence of any other subsequent events; I further certify that I am a Registered Consulting Arborist® with the American Society of Consulting Arborists, and that I acknowledge, accept and adhere to the ASCA Standards of Professional Practice. I am an International Society of Arboriculture Board Certified Master Arborist®. I have been involved with the practice of Arboriculture and the care and study of trees since 1998. Richard J. Gessner ASCA Registered Consulting Arborist® #496 ISA Board Certified Master Arborist® WE-4341B Copyright © Copyright 2021, Monarch Consulting Arborists LLC. Other than specific exception granted for copies made by the client for the express uses stated in this report, no parts of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, recording, or otherwise without the express, written permission of the author. Monarch Consulting Arborists LLC - P.O Box 1010, Felton, CA 95018 831.331.8982 - rick@monarcharborist.com Page of 28 28 This Page Intentionally Left Blank Parks and Public Works Department • Engineering Division • 41 Miles Ave, Los Gatos, CA 95030 408.399.5771 • www.losgatosca.gov • www.facebook.com/losgatosca TOWN OF LOS GATOS PARKS AND PUBLIC WORKS PLAN CHECK COMMENTS June 8, 2021 Attn: Mike Yao Core States Group 4240 East Jurupa St. Suite 402 Ontario, CA 91761 RE: 15475 Los Gatos Blvd Traffic Review Dear Mike, The Town has completed the first review of the 15475 Los Gatos Blvd Traffic Queue Analysis as prepared by TJW Engineering Inc., dated February 3, 2021 (18 Pages). Our comments are as follows: 1)Include trip generation calculation in the report. See peer review comments, attached. Please note, per Town’s current traffic impact policy, a full traffic impact analysis would be required if a proposed project adds 20 or more peak-hour trips. In addition, traffic impact fees would be required if there is a net increase in daily trips. 2)Include VMT analysis in the report. Please see attached peer review comments. Please provide a compliance memorandum showing how all of the deficiencies and comments have been addressed. PLEASE NOTE THAT COMMENTS/DEFICIENCIES LISTED ABOVE MAY NOT BE AN EXHAUSTIVE LIST OF ALL PLAN CHECK COMMENTS OR CONDITIONS. For expedited processing, please: •Revise the Plan to clearly respond to the above comments. •Respond with an itemized response letter which indicates where the responses are located (page number, reference, detail and what corrections or clarifications were made). •Resubmit an electronic copy (PDF) of the revised TDM Plan, response letter, and any other information requested. Please note that the comments listed above may not be an exhaustive list of all plan check comments made on the plan sheets. Please email MVroman@losgatosca.gov to discuss any comments or questions. Sincerely, Mike Vroman, T.E. Senior Traffic Engineer Enc: TJKM Peer Review of 15475 Los Gatos Blvd Report EXHIBIT 11 CALIFORNIA | FLORIDA | TEXAS Corporate Office 4305 Hacienda Drive, Suite 550, Pleasanton, CA 94588 925.463.0611 www.TJKM.com 1 TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM TJKM has completed a peer review of the application of the McDonalds restaurant at 15475 Los Gatos Boulevard to add drive through window service to an existing restaurant. This peer review focuses on added trip generation, queuing related to the drive-thru window service and a vehicle miles traveled (VMT) analysis. Information on trip generation and VMT analyses is not included in the material submitted with the application. Trip Generation The table below illustrates the changes in trips associated with the addition of a drive-thru window based on information in the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation, 10th Edition. The MacDonald’s restaurant has 4,267 square feet. TRIPS GENERATED BY 4,267 SQUARE FEET DAILY A.M PEAK HOUR P.M. PEAK HOUR Existing Trip Rates (ITE 933) Per KSF 346.23 25.10 28.34 Existing Trips 1,478 108 121 Existing with Drive-thru Trip Rates (ITE 934) 470.95 40.19 32.67 Existing with Drive-thru Trips 2,010 172 140 Increase in Trips 532 (36%) 64 (60%) 19 (16%) Increase in Trips after applying 50% Pass By 266 32 10 Date: June 1, 2021 To: Michael Vroman From: Chris D. Kinzel Subject: 15475 Los Gatos Blvd. Peer Review 2 As noted in the table, based on data from ITE sources, the drive-thru lane attracts more customers. The biggest increase is in the morning peak hour during which there is a 60 percent increase in trips. There will be about 64 more peak hour trips in the morning, which results from 32 vehicles arriving and leaving. Again based on a large data base of ITE statistics, half of the trips are made by vehicles already driving on the street, categorizing them as pass-by trips. It could be argued that passby percentages would be even greater than the ITE-quoted 50 percent, making the net trips noted in the table conservatively high. It is not expected that added traffic generated by the drive-thru lanes at the MacDonald’s located at 15475 Los Gatos Blvd. will create any significant traffic issues. Drive-thru Lane Queuing The queuing analysis submitted by the applicant includes surveys of queued vehicles at three locations along the I-680 corridor in Pleasant Hill, Danville and San Ramon. All three of these locations are located along major arterial streets, similar in character to the Los Gatos site. Although the data do not include the size of the restaurant or the length of the drive-thru lane, the queue length numbers are reflective of studies conducted by TJKM and others for MacDonald’s type restaurants. The observed maximum queues typically are in the range of eight to 12 vehicles. TJKM makes the following observations about the queuing area proposed for the site: 1. Eight vehicles can be accommodated in the drive through lane. 2. The entire MacDonald’s site is separated from other users in the shopping center. Vehicles going to or from other businesses in the area will not be blocked by any MacDonald’s drive-thru lane overflow. 3. The drive-thru lane is also located in a non-critical portion of the MacDonald’s lot itself with practically no stall blockage created by even a major overflow (more than 14 vehicles.) 4. Even the most severe overflow will not affect non-MacDonald’s businesses or customers. 5. Although queue management procedures recommended are practical and implementable, they would not expect to be required. 6. Encouraging employees to park near the trash enclosure and where potential traffic directors would take table orders would minimize potential on-site congestion. This would ensure that customers would not be able to park in the areas that might congest. TJKM concludes that provisions for queuing at the drive-thru lanes are very satisfactory. 3 Vehicle Miles Traveled The VMT guidelines and standards prepared by the Office of Planning and Research offer the following comments on small retail projects such as the MacDonald’s proposal: “Because new retail development typically redistributes shopping trips rather than creating new trips, estimating the total change in VMT (i.e., the difference in total VMT in the area affected with and without the project) is the best way to analyze a retail project’s transportation impacts. By adding retail opportunities into the urban fabric and thereby improving retail destination proximity, local-serving retail development tends to shorten trips and reduce VMT. Thus, lead agencies generally may presume such development creates a less-than-significant transportation impact. Regional-serving retail development, on the other hand, which can lead to substitution of longer trips for shorter ones, may tend to have a significant impact. Where such development decreases VMT, lead agencies should consider the impact to be less-than-significant. Because lead agencies will best understand their own communities and the likely travel behaviors of future project users, they are likely in the best position to decide when a project will likely be local-serving. Generally, however, retail development including stores larger than 50,000 square feet might be considered regional-serving, and so lead agencies should undertake an analysis to determine whether the project might increase or decrease VMT.” Source: State of California Governor’s Office of Planning and Research, Technical Advisory on Evaluating Transportation Impacts in CEQA, April 2018. TJKM concludes that the proposed construction of drive-thru lanes at the existing MacDonald’s restaurant at 15475 Los Gatos Boulevard can be classified as a local serving retail project, which technically does not create new trips or VMT in the urban setting, but redistributes existing traffic. Therefore, it may be classified as a project that has no significant VTM impacts. 6 Venture, Suite 225 | Irvine, California 92618 | 949.878.3509 |www.tjwengineering.com February 3, 2021 Mr. Mike Yao CORE STATES GROUP 4240 East Jurupa Street, Suite 402 Ontario, CA 91761 Subject: Drive-Through Queue Analysis - 15475 Los Gatos Road McDonalds Dear Mr. Yao: TJW ENGINEERING, INC. (TJW) is pleased to submit this drive-through queue analysis for the proposed circulation and drive-through configuration changes at the McDonalds restaurant at 15475 Los Gatos Road in the City of Los Gatos. This report summarizes the results of site queue observations conducted at two comparable McDonalds location with two order boards. Appendix A contains the proposed site plan for the McDonalds restaurant at 15475 Los Gatos Road. Drive-Through Queue Analysis Methodology Peak periods for McDonalds restaurants are typically weekdays in the morning, lunchtime, and in the evening. Therefore, site queue observations were conducted on a weekday from 6:00-9:00 AM, 11:00 AM- 2:00 PM, and 4:30-7:30 PM. Data was collected in 5-minute increments at three comparable McDonalds locations with drive-through configurations similar to the proposed project modifications. The data collection resulted in sample size of 108 weekday data points at each location for a total of 324 data points. The data collected can be used to determine the 85th percentile queue length, which is typically used to determine the appropriate vehicle stacking needed for drive through restaurants. Comparative Sites Comparable sites for drive-through queue analysis were determined based on discussions with the project applicant. Drive-through queue and operational information was collected at the following three McDonalds sites: ·Danville McDonalds located at 10000 Crow Canyon Road, Danville CA ·Pleasant Hill McDonalds located at 1690 Contra Costa Blvd, Pleasant Hill, CA EXHIBIT 12 15475 Los Gatos Road McDonalds Drive-Through Queue Analysis CSG-21-001 2 · San Ramon McDonalds located at 2481 San Ramon Valley Blvd., San Ramon CA The Danville McDonalds consists of two drive through lanes that merge into one lane. The drive-through is served by two order boards, similar to the proposed modifications at the Los Gatos location. Data was collected at the Danville site on Thursday, April 11, 2019. The Pleasant Hill McDonalds consists of two drive through lanes that merge into one lane. The drive-through is served by two order boards, similar to the proposed modifications at the Los Gatos location. Data was collected at the Pleasant Hill site on Thursday, April 11, 2019. At the time data was collected, the San Ramon McDonalds consisted of a single drive through lane with one order board. Data was collected at the San Ramon site on Thursday, April 11, 2019. Figure 1: Danville McDonalds Site 15475 Los Gatos Road McDonalds Drive-Through Queue Analysis CSG-21-001 3 Figure 2: Pleasant Hill McDonalds Site Figure 3: San Ramon McDonalds Site 15475 Los Gatos Road McDonalds Drive-Through Queue Analysis CSG-21-001 4 The drive-through queue was observed and recorded at each of the survey sites during the following time periods, which correspond with typical peak periods of demand at McDonalds restaurants: · Thursday morning from 6:00 AM to 9:00 AM · Thursday mid-day from 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM; and · Thursday evening from 4:30 PM to 7:30 PM. The queue was recorded in five-minute increments resulting in 108 data points per site and a total of 324 observation points overall. For each 5-minute interval, the highest queue observed within the interval was recorded. Drive-Through Queue Observation Results Based on the collected data, Table 1 shows the number of times a certain queue length occurred and the probability of that queue length not being exceeded. Complete observation data is provided in Appendix B. Table 1: Summary of Drive-Through Queue Observations and Analysis Drive-Through Queue Analysis Queue Length (Vehicles) Number of Occurrences Total Number of Data Points Probability of Exceeding Queue Length 0 32 32 90.12% 1 44 76 76.54% 2 50 126 61.11% 3 35 161 50.31% 4 35 196 39.51% 5 44 240 25.93% 6 23 263 18.83% 7 21 284 12.35% 8 20 304 6.17% 9 11 315 2.78% 10 4 319 1.54% 11 4 323 0.31% 12 0 323 0.31% 13 1 324 0.00% 85th Percentile Info Queue Length: 7 Vehicles Data Point: 276th When determining the appropriate queue storage, a drive-through should typically be designed to accommodate the 85th percentile queue length. Based on the data collected at the three comparable sites, the 85th percentile queue length is seven (7) vehicles which occurred at the 276th data point. The maximum observed queue was thirteen (13) vehicles occurring one time. 15475 Los Gatos Road McDonalds Drive-Through Queue Analysis CSG-21-001 5 As shown in potential queue management exhibit in Appendix A, the proposed site reconfiguration will construct a single lane drive-through with two order boards and a single pick-up window. The drive-through lane will have room for approximately 8 vehicles before it would spill into the nearest drive aisle. This capacity would meet the 85th percentile queue observed at the comparable sites. While the proposed drive-through configuration will accommodate the 85th percentile queue, TJW recommends that the site have a queue management plan in place for periods in which a longer queue may form. Potential forms of queue management could include restaurant staff taking orders via tablets and directing traffic. Vehicles in the drive-through queue should be directed to pull forward, keep driveway aisles clear, and not block existing parking spaces. This would help maximize the capacity of the drive-through while maintaining on-site circulation. Appendix A contains potential forms of queue management to be considered for the proposed site reconfiguration. Conclusion The proposed project at the McDonalds restaurant at 15475 Los Gatos Road will reconfigure the existing restaurant and construct a single lane drive-through with two order boards. The drive-through will have the capacity for approximately eight (8) vehicles before spilling into the nearest driveway aisle. Based on data from three comparable sites, the proposed drive-through lane will accommodate the observed 85th percentile queue length which is seven (7) vehicles. Please contact us at (949) 878-3509 if you have any questions regarding this analysis. Sincerely, Thomas Wheat, PE, TE David Chew, PTP President Transportation Planner Registered Civil Engineer #69467 Registered Traffic Engineer #2565 Jeffrey Chinchilla, PE Project Engineer APPENDIX A SITE PLAN/QUEUE MANAGEMENT Not to ScaleExhibit 1: Project Site Plan15475 Los Gatos Road McDonaldsDrive-Through Queue AnalysisCSG-21-001 YOUTHANKTHR U DRI V E THR U DRI V ENO PARKINGNO PARKINGNot to ScaleExhibit 2: Potential Queue Management15475 Los Gatos Road McDonaldsDrive-Through Queue AnalysisCSG-21-001KEEP AISLE CLEAR**POTENTIAL TABLET ORDERS/TRAFFIC DIRECTORSDRIVE-THRU QUEUE FLOW APPENDIX B DRIVE-THROUGH QUEUE DATA McDonalds 10000 Crow Canyon Road Danville, CA  4/11/2019 6:00 AM 1001 6:05 AM 0000 6:10 AM 1001 6:15 AM 0000 6:20 AM 2002 6:25 AM 0000 6:30 AM 1001 6:35 AM 0000 6:40 AM 1001 6:45 AM 3014 6:50 AM 1001 6:55 AM 0000 7:00 AM 1001 7:05 AM 3003 7:10 AM 0000 7:15 AM 2002 7:20 AM 0011 7:25 AM 1001 7:30 AM 2002 7:35 AM 0101 7:40 AM 2002 7:45 AM 0011 7:50 AM 0011 7:55 AM 0000 8:00 AM 0101 8:05 AM 3003 8:10 AM 0011 8:15 AM 3003 8:20 AM 3003 8:25 AM 0022 8:30 AM 3014 8:35 AM 1001 8:40 AM 0022 8:45 AM 0000 8:50 AM 1001 8:55 AM 1012 Time Queue Pick‐up to Order Board Left Line Queue Order Board Back Right Line Queue Order Board Back Total Queue McDonalds 10000 Crow Canyon Road Danville, CA  4/11/2019 11:00 AM 2002 11:05 AM 0011 11:10 AM 0011 11:15 AM 0000 11:20 AM 0000 11:25 AM 0000 11:30 AM 1001 11:35 AM 0000 11:40 AM 0000 11:45 AM 4138 11:50 AM 6006 11:55 AM 3115 12:00 PM 3115 12:05 PM 0000 12:10 PM 5005 12:15 PM 2024 12:20 PM 2125 12:25 PM 7018 12:30 PM 3014 12:35 PM 2103 12:40 PM 3115 12:45 PM 4138 12:50 PM 2114 12:55 PM 4015 1:00 PM 2114 1:05 PM 4015 1:10 PM 1023 1:15 PM 0123 1:20 PM 5005 1:25 PM 0011 1:30 PM 2002 1:35 PM 1001 1:40 PM 2002 1:45 PM 4105 1:50 PM 0000 1:55 PM 2002 Time Queue Pick‐up to Order Board Left Line Queue Order Board Back Total Queue Right Line Queue Order Board Back McDonalds 10000 Crow Canyon Road Danville, CA  4/11/2019 4:30 PM 1102 4:35 PM 3003 4:40 PM 2002 4:45 PM 1001 4:50 PM 0000 4:55 PM 0000 5:00 PM 2125 5:05 PM 6129 5:10 PM 6017 5:15 PM 3014 5:20 PM 3115 5:25 PM 4004 5:30 PM 4217 5:35 PM 2002 5:40 PM 4116 5:45 PM 3003 5:50 PM 6017 5:55 PM 0123 6:00 PM 2013 6:05 PM 1001 6:10 PM 4004 6:15 PM 3 4 4 11 6:20 PM 5319 6:25 PM 5005 6:30 PM 6118 6:35 PM 3115 6:40 PM 2002 6:45 PM 4127 6:50 PM 6017 6:55 PM 3003 7:00 PM 2002 7:05 PM 1001 7:10 PM 0000 7:15 PM 0000 7:20 PM 1012 7:25 PM 1001 Time Queue Pick‐up to Order Board Left Line Queue Order Board Back Total Queue Right Line Queue Order Board Back McDonalds 1690 Contra Costa Blvd Pleasant Hill, CA 4/11/2019 6:00 AM 0000 6:05 AM 2002 6:10 AM 1102 6:15 AM 1001 6:20 AM 2002 6:25 AM 0000 6:30 AM 0000 6:35 AM 0000 6:40 AM 2002 6:45 AM 2002 6:50 AM 0101 6:55 AM 2002 7:00 AM 3003 7:05 AM 0000 7:10 AM 0101 7:15 AM 0011 7:20 AM 3003 7:25 AM 1102 7:30 AM 5106 7:35 AM 6118 7:40 AM 3003 7:45 AM 3003 7:50 AM 1001 7:55 AM 3104 8:00 AM 1001 8:05 AM 5106 8:10 AM 5005 8:15 AM 6006 8:20 AM 6309 8:25 AM 6 2 2 10 8:30 AM 6219 8:35 AM 5106 8:40 AM 0000 8:45 AM 2002 8:50 AM 0112 8:55 AM 1102 Total Queue Right Line Queue Order Board Back Time Queue Pick‐up to Order Board Left Line Queue Order Board Back McDonalds 1690 Contra Costa Blvd Pleasant Hill, CA 4/11/2019 11:00 AM 2002 11:05 AM 0101 11:10 AM 4004 11:15 AM 2103 11:20 AM 2002 11:25 AM 3003 11:30 AM 1001 11:35 AM 2114 11:40 AM 1001 11:45 AM 0000 11:50 AM 0000 11:55 AM 1001 12:00 PM 1012 12:05 PM 2103 12:10 PM 1214 12:15 PM 4105 12:20 PM 3115 12:25 PM 3003 12:30 PM 4217 12:35 PM 5005 12:40 PM 3104 12:45 PM 1102 12:50 PM 5005 12:55 PM 5229 1:00 PM 4105 1:05 PM 6118 1:10 PM 1113 1:15 PM 2103 1:20 PM 5106 1:25 PM 2002 1:30 PM 1102 1:35 PM 3003 1:40 PM 2002 1:45 PM 1001 1:50 PM 2204 1:55 PM 2226 Total Queue Right Line Queue Order Board Back Time Queue Pick‐up to Order Board Left Line Queue Order Board Back McDonalds 1690 Contra Costa Blvd Pleasant Hill, CA 4/11/2019 4:30 PM 1012 4:35 PM 2002 4:40 PM 0101 4:45 PM 4105 4:50 PM 1001 4:55 PM 2237 5:00 PM 6208 5:05 PM 4217 5:10 PM 3003 5:15 PM 2103 5:20 PM 3115 5:25 PM 1102 5:30 PM 0000 5:35 PM 0000 5:40 PM 4105 5:45 PM 1001 5:50 PM 0000 5:55 PM 1001 6:00 PM 5005 6:05 PM 2103 6:10 PM 3104 6:15 PM 3115 6:20 PM 1102 6:25 PM 0202 6:30 PM 4105 6:35 PM 1102 6:40 PM 2215 6:45 PM 2114 6:50 PM 3115 6:55 PM 1102 7:00 PM 3003 7:05 PM 2013 7:10 PM 4004 7:15 PM 1102 7:20 PM 0000 7:25 PM 2002 Total Queue Right Line Queue Order Board Back Time Queue Pick‐up to Order Board Left Line Queue Order Board Back McDonalds 2481 San Ramon Valley Road San Ramon, CA 4/11/2019 6:00 AM 1 0 1 6:05 AM 1 1 2 6:10 AM 1 1 2 6:15 AM 3 2 5 6:20 AM 4 0 4 6:25 AM 3 5 8 6:30 AM 5 6 11 6:35 AM 3 3 6 6:40 AM 2 1 3 6:45 AM 2 1 3 6:50 AM 5 2 7 6:55 AM 4 4 8 7:00 AM 3 3 6 7:05 AM 3 3 6 7:10 AM 3 1 4 7:15 AM 3 5 8 7:20 AM 3 3 6 7:25 AM 2 2 4 7:30 AM 1 0 1 7:35 AM 2 0 2 7:40 AM 3 2 5 7:45 AM 2 2 4 7:50 AM 4 3 7 7:55 AM 2 2 4 8:00 AM 3 1 4 8:05 AM 2 5 7 8:10 AM 4 2 6 8:15 AM 3 1 4 8:20 AM 0 0 0 8:25 AM 1 1 2 8:30 AM 3 3 6 8:35 AM 3 3 6 8:40 AM 3 0 3 8:45 AM 2 1 3 8:50 AM 1 0 1 8:55 AM 1 1 2 Total Line Queue Order Board Back Total QueueQueue Pick‐up to Order BoardTime McDonalds 2481 San Ramon Valley Road San Ramon, CA 4/11/2019 11:00 AM 1 6 7 11:05 AM 1 7 8 11:10 AM 4 6 10 11:15 AM 3 10 13 11:20 AM 4 7 11 11:25 AM 3 5 8 11:30 AM 2 7 9 11:35 AM 3 6 9 11:40 AM 2 6 8 11:45 AM 4 7 11 11:50 AM 2 5 7 11:55 AM 3 3 6 12:00 PM 3 6 9 12:05 PM 4 5 9 12:10 PM 2 7 9 12:15 PM 3 5 8 12:20 PM 4 1 5 12:25 PM 2 2 4 12:30 PM 1 0 1 12:35 PM 3 3 6 12:40 PM 3 5 8 12:45 PM 5 3 8 12:50 PM 4 3 7 12:55 PM 2 1 3 1:00 PM 1 3 4 1:05 PM 4 2 6 1:10 PM 3 7 10 1:15 PM 4 0 4 1:20 PM 3 0 3 1:25 PM 3 1 4 1:30 PM 2 0 2 1:35 PM 2 0 2 1:40 PM 3 1 4 1:45 PM 4 2 6 1:50 PM 4 6 10 1:55 PM 3 5 8 Queue Pick‐up to Order Board Total Line Queue Order Board Back Total QueueTime McDonalds 2481 San Ramon Valley Road San Ramon, CA 4/11/2019 4:30 PM 4 5 9 4:35 PM 4 1 5 4:40 PM 4 1 5 4:45 PM 4 1 5 4:50 PM 3 4 7 4:55 PM 3 1 4 5:00 PM 1 0 1 5:05 PM 3 1 4 5:10 PM 4 0 4 5:15 PM 2 4 6 5:20 PM 4 4 8 5:25 PM 4 2 6 5:30 PM 3 2 5 5:35 PM 4 1 5 5:40 PM 3 1 4 5:45 PM 3 4 7 5:50 PM 4 4 8 5:55 PM 4 1 5 6:00 PM 3 2 5 6:05 PM 3 2 5 6:10 PM 2 3 5 6:15 PM 4 1 5 6:20 PM 1 2 3 6:25 PM 3 3 6 6:30 PM 3 3 6 6:35 PM 4 4 8 6:40 PM 2 2 4 6:45 PM 4 3 7 6:50 PM 3 2 5 6:55 PM 2 3 5 7:00 PM 2 3 5 7:05 PM 4 3 7 7:10 PM 3 4 7 7:15 PM 4 3 7 7:20 PM 4 3 7 7:25 PM 3 2 5 Queue Pick‐up to Order Board Total Line Queue Order Board Back Total QueueTime MEMORANDUM To: Teri Wissler Adam, Project Manager and Principal‐in‐Charge  From: Sally Rideout EMPA, Principal   Cc: File  Date: October 27, 2022  Re: 15475 Los Gatos Boulevard CUP   Emissions Modeling, Air Quality, Energy, and Greenhouse Gases  Determinations  Criteria air pollutant and greenhouse gas emissions for the proposed addition of drive through  services to an existing 4,270 square foot fast food restaurant are modeled using the California  Emissions Estimator Model (CalEEMod) version 2020.4. The model results for annual and  seasonal (summer) existing and proposed uses are attached to this memorandum  (Attachment A).   The proposed project would remodel the existing building and parking lot to add service  windows, signage and re‐stripe the parking lot. No grading is proposed that would require  large diesel‐powered construction equipment over a lengthy construction period. Existing  emissions for a fast‐food restaurant without a drive‐through window and proposed emissions  for a fast‐food restaurant with a drive‐through window are modeled and compared to show the  difference in criteria air pollutant and GHG emissions generated by the addition of the drive‐ through. The modeled results were compared to air district thresholds for criteria air pollutants.   Air Quality Determination An analysis of air quality impacts using the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)  Appendix G initial study format is Attached (Attachment B). A reduction in operational mobile  EXHIBIT 13 Teri Wissler Adam  EMC Planning Group  October 27, Page 2  MEMORANDUM source emissions was anticipated due to reducing the number of engine starts at the site by  adding a drive‐through lane. The modeled results confirm that operational criteria pollutant  emissions would be reduced by the addition of the drive through lane (Attachment A). This is a  beneficial impact.   The proposed project is consistent with emissions control measures of the Bay Area Air Quality  Management District Clean Air Plan (2017) and no significant impacts related to regional air  quality, sensitive receptor exposures to substantial emissions or odors would result from the  proposed project.   Greenhouse Gas Emissions Determination The modeled annual results show that the addition of a drive through service would also  reduce operational GHG emissions of a 4,270 square‐foot fast food restaurant by 285.06 MT  CO2e (from 1,049.37 MT CO2e to 764.31 MT CO2e) (refer to Attachment A). Vehicle Miles  Traveled (VMT) would increase, but mobile‐source CO2e would be reduced, again, due  primarily to a reduction in engine starts. Therefore, the proposed project would not generate  greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, and would not conflict with any  applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of  greenhouse gases. The reduced GHG emissions is a beneficial impact.  Energy Determination The modeled results show that the energy demand for a fast‐food restaurant with or without a  drive through window would essentially be the same. There may be slight changes in electrical  demand due to changes in lighting, etc., but these are not substantial enough to be captured by  the model. However, the modeled results do show an increase in VMT, which may translate  into a slight increase in customer fuel demand. The proposed project is subject to compliance  with Title 24 Building Energy Efficiency standards and would not result in a potentially  significant environmental impact due to wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of  energy resources, during project construction or operations, and would not conflict with or  obstruct a state or local plan for renewable energy or energy efficiency.  2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission) Unmitigated Construction tblConstDustMitigation WaterUnpavedRoadVehicleSpeed 0 5 2.0 Emissions Summary Water Mitigation - Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value 0.004 1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data Project Characteristics - Land Use - Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - CO2 Intensity (lb/MWhr) 203.98 CH4 Intensity (lb/MWhr) 0.033 N2O Intensity (lb/MWhr) Climate Zone 5 Operational Year 2023 Utility Company Pacific Gas and Electric Company 0 1.2 Other Project Characteristics Urbanization Urban Wind Speed (m/s)2.2 Precipitation Freq (Days)64 Fast Food Restaurant w/o Drive Thru 4.27 1000sqft 0.10 4,270.00 MacDonald's Without Drive Through Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer 1.0 Project Characteristics 1.1 Land Usage Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1 Date: 10/20/2021 3:39 PM MacDonald's Without Drive Through - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1 Date: 10/20/2021 3:39 PM MacDonald's Without Drive Through - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 2.2 Overall Operational 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Percent Reduction 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 58.64 0.00 50.15 59.68 0.00 44.48 0.00 0.4433 3.8500e- 003 1,437.9541 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 0.5872 1.6064 0.0000 1,426.3892 1,426.38920.0147 2.1374 0.6383 2.7757 1.0192Maximum9.1107 14.3467 7.8506 1,169.6112 1,169.6112 0.3579 3.7300e- 003 1,178.2466 0.4433 3.8500e- 003 1,437.9541 2022 9.1107 7.0832 7.4995 0.0126 0.1479 0.3726 0.4447 0.0392 0.3428 0.3491 0.0000 0.5872 1.6064 0.0000 1,426.3892 1,426.38920.0147 2.1374 0.6383 2.7757 1.019220211.3135 14.3467 7.8506 CH4 N2O CO2e Year lb/day lb/day Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2SO2Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 ROG NOx CO 0.4433 3.8500e- 003 1,437.9541 Mitigated Construction 0.5872 3.1732 0.0000 1,426.3892 1,426.38920.0147 5.3777 0.6383 6.0159 2.5860Maximum9.1107 14.3467 7.8506 1,169.6112 1,169.6112 0.3579 3.7300e- 003 1,178.2466 0.4433 3.8500e- 003 1,437.9541 2022 9.1107 7.0832 7.4995 0.0126 0.1479 0.3726 0.4447 0.0392 0.3428 0.3491 0.0000 0.5872 3.1732 0.0000 1,426.3892 1,426.38920.0147 5.3777 0.6383 6.0159 2.586020211.3135 14.3467 7.8506 N2O CO2e Year lb/day lb/day PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1 Date: 10/20/2021 3:39 PM MacDonald's Without Drive Through - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied N20 CO2ePM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 ROG NOx CO SO2 10,368.118 3 10,368.118 3 0.7137 0.5024 10,535.671 3 0.7093 0.4982 10,303.740 9 Total 7.1397 5.9340 50.1753 0.1009 10.0863 0.0881 10.1744 2.6863 0.0831 2.7693 0.0685 2.7547 10,137.558 0 10,137.558 0 0.0997 10.0863 0.0735 10.1598 2.6863Mobile7.0149 5.7418 50.0134 230.5594 230.5594 4.4200e- 003 4.2300e-003 231.9295 0.0000 1.0000e- 003 Energy 0.0211 0.1921 0.1614 1.1500e-003 0.0146 0.0146 0.0146 0.0146 0.0000 0.0000 9.3000e- 004 9.3000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Area0.1036 0.0000 4.4000e-004 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 Mitigated Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 10,368.118 3 10,368.118 3 0.7137 0.5024 10,535.671 3 0.7093 0.4982 10,303.740 9 Total 7.1397 5.9340 50.1753 0.1009 10.0863 0.0881 10.1744 2.6863 0.0831 2.7693 0.0685 2.7547 10,137.558 0 10,137.558 0 0.0997 10.0863 0.0735 10.1598 2.6863Mobile7.0149 5.7418 50.0134 230.5594 230.5594 4.4200e- 003 4.2300e-003 231.9295 0.0000 1.0000e- 003 Energy 0.0211 0.1921 0.1614 1.1500e-003 0.0146 0.0146 0.0146 0.0146 0.0000 0.0000 9.3000e- 004 9.3000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Area0.1036 0.0000 4.4000e-004 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 Unmitigated Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1 Date: 10/20/2021 3:39 PM MacDonald's Without Drive Through - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 0.38PavingRollers17.00 80 0.41 Paving Pavers 1 7.00 130 0.42 Site Preparation Graders 1 8.00 187 0.20 Grading Graders 1 6.00 187 0.41 Building Construction Forklifts 2 6.00 89 0.73 Building Construction Cranes 1 4.00 231 0.29 Demolition Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.00 81 0.48 Paving Cement and Mortar Mixers 4 6.00 9 0.56 Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 Acres of Paving: 0 Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non-Residential Indoor: 6,405; Non-Residential Outdoor: 2,135; Striped Parking Area: 0 (Architectural OffRoad Equipment Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor 5 5 Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0.5 Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 1.5 6 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 5/19/2022 5/25/2022 5 100 5 Paving Paving 5/12/2022 5/18/2022 5 5 4 Building Construction Building Construction 12/23/2021 5/11/2022 5 1 3 Grading Grading 12/21/2021 12/22/2021 5 2 2 Site Preparation Site Preparation 12/18/2021 12/20/2021 Num Days Week Num Days Phase Description 1 Demolition Demolition 12/6/2021 12/17/2021 5 10 Phase Number Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase Percent Reduction 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1 Date: 10/20/2021 3:39 PM MacDonald's Without Drive Through - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 HHDT 3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction Water Exposed Area Reduce Vehicle Speed on Unpaved Roads 3.2 Demolition - 2021 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_MixSite Preparation 2 5.00 0.00 0.00 HHDT Paving 7 18.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_MixGrading38.00 0.00 0.00 HHDT Demolition 4 10.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_MixBuilding Construction 5 2.00 1.00 0.00 Vendor Vehicle Class Hauling Vehicle Class Architectural Coating 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Hauling Trip Number Worker Trip Length Vendor Trip Length Hauling Trip Length Worker Vehicle Class Trips and VMT Phase Name Offroad Equipment Count Worker Trip Number Vendor Trip Number 0.37 Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 8.00 97 0.37 Paving Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 7.00 97 0.37 Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 7.00 97 0.37 Demolition Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 6.00 97 0.40 Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 8.00 97 0.37 Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 6.00 247 Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers 1 1.00 247 0.40 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1 Date: 10/20/2021 3:39 PM MacDonald's Without Drive Through - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 1,147.4338 1,147.4338 0.2138 1,152.7797 0.2138 1,152.7797 Total 0.7965 7.2530 7.5691 0.0120 0.4073 0.4073 0.3886 0.3886 0.0000 0.3886 0.3886 0.0000 1,147.4338 1,147.43380.0120 0.4073 0.4073Off-Road 0.7965 7.2530 7.5691 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 76.6555 76.6555 2.2700e- 003 2.0200e- 003 77.3150 2.2700e- 003 2.0200e- 003 77.3150 Total 0.0314 0.0199 0.2815 7.6000e-004 0.0822 4.5000e- 004 0.0826 0.0218 4.2000e- 004 0.0222 4.2000e- 004 0.0222 76.6555 76.65557.6000e-004 0.0822 4.5000e- 004 0.0826 0.0218Worker0.0314 0.0199 0.2815 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 1,147.4338 1,147.4338 0.2138 1,152.7797 0.2138 1,152.7797 Total 0.7965 7.2530 7.5691 0.0120 0.4073 0.4073 0.3886 0.3886 0.3886 0.3886 1,147.4338 1,147.43380.0120 0.4073 0.4073Off-Road 0.7965 7.2530 7.5691 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1 Date: 10/20/2021 3:39 PM MacDonald's Without Drive Through - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 0.3049 950.20550.2755 0.3328 942.5842 942.58429.7300e-003 0.5303 0.2995 0.8297 0.0573Total0.6403 7.8204 4.0274 942.5842 942.5842 0.3049 950.2055 0.0000 Off-Road 0.6403 7.8204 4.0274 9.7300e-003 0.2995 0.2995 0.2755 0.2755 0.0000 0.0573 0.00000.5303 0.0000 0.5303 0.0573Fugitive Dust N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 3.3 Site Preparation - 2021 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 76.6555 76.6555 2.2700e- 003 2.0200e- 003 77.3150 2.2700e- 003 2.0200e- 003 77.3150 Total 0.0314 0.0199 0.2815 7.6000e-004 0.0822 4.5000e- 004 0.0826 0.0218 4.2000e- 004 0.0222 4.2000e- 004 0.0222 76.6555 76.65557.6000e-004 0.0822 4.5000e- 004 0.0826 0.0218Worker0.0314 0.0199 0.2815 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1 Date: 10/20/2021 3:39 PM MacDonald's Without Drive Through - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 0.3049 950.2055 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 0.2755 0.2978 0.0000 942.5842 942.58429.7300e-003 0.2068 0.2995 0.5063 0.0223Total0.6403 7.8204 4.0274 942.5842 942.5842 0.3049 950.2055 0.0000 Off-Road 0.6403 7.8204 4.0274 9.7300e-003 0.2995 0.2995 0.2755 0.2755 0.0000 0.0000 0.0223 0.00000.2068 0.0000 0.2068 0.0223Fugitive Dust N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 38.3277 38.3277 1.1300e- 003 1.0100e- 003 38.6575 1.1300e- 003 1.0100e- 003 38.6575 Total 0.0157 9.9600e-003 0.1408 3.8000e-004 0.0411 2.3000e- 004 0.0413 0.0109 2.1000e- 004 0.0111 2.1000e- 004 0.0111 38.3277 38.32773.8000e-004 0.0411 2.3000e- 004 0.0413 0.0109Worker0.0157 9.9600e-003 0.1408 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2SO2Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 ROG NOx CO Unmitigated Construction Off-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1 Date: 10/20/2021 3:39 PM MacDonald's Without Drive Through - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 0.4415 1,376.1020 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site 0.5869 3.1554 1,365.0648 1,365.06480.0141 5.3119 0.6379 5.9499 2.5686Total1.2884 14.3307 6.3314 1,365.0648 1,365.0648 0.4415 1,376.1020 0.0000 Off-Road 1.2884 14.3307 6.3314 0.0141 0.6379 0.6379 0.5869 0.5869 0.0000 2.5686 0.00005.3119 0.0000 5.3119 2.5686Fugitive Dust N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 3.4 Grading - 2021 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 38.3277 38.3277 1.1300e- 003 1.0100e- 003 38.6575 1.1300e- 003 1.0100e- 003 38.6575 Total 0.0157 9.9600e-003 0.1408 3.8000e-004 0.0411 2.3000e- 004 0.0413 0.0109 2.1000e- 004 0.0111 2.1000e- 004 0.0111 38.3277 38.32773.8000e-004 0.0411 2.3000e- 004 0.0413 0.0109Worker0.0157 9.9600e-003 0.1408 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2SO2Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 ROG NOx CO CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1 Date: 10/20/2021 3:39 PM MacDonald's Without Drive Through - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied CH4 N2O CO2eExhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2SO2Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 ROG NOx CO 0.4415 1,376.1020 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 0.5869 1.5886 0.0000 1,365.0648 1,365.06480.0141 2.0717 0.6379 2.7096 1.0017Total1.2884 14.3307 6.3314 1,365.0648 1,365.0648 0.4415 1,376.1020 0.0000 Off-Road 1.2884 14.3307 6.3314 0.0141 0.6379 0.6379 0.5869 0.5869 0.0000 0.0000 1.0017 0.00002.0717 0.0000 2.0717 1.0017Fugitive Dust N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 61.3244 61.3244 1.8200e- 003 1.6200e- 003 61.8520 1.8200e- 003 1.6200e- 003 61.8520 Total 0.0251 0.0159 0.2252 6.1000e-004 0.0657 3.6000e- 004 0.0661 0.0174 3.3000e- 004 0.0178 3.3000e- 004 0.0178 61.3244 61.32446.1000e-004 0.0657 3.6000e- 004 0.0661 0.0174Worker0.0251 0.0159 0.2252 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2SO2Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 ROG NOx CO CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1 Date: 10/20/2021 3:39 PM MacDonald's Without Drive Through - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 1,103.2158 1,103.2158 0.3568 1,112.1358 0.3568 1,112.1358 Total 0.7750 7.9850 7.2637 0.0114 0.4475 0.4475 0.4117 0.4117 0.4117 0.4117 1,103.2158 1,103.21580.0114 0.4475 0.4475Off-Road 0.7750 7.9850 7.2637 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 3.5 Building Construction - 2021 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 61.3244 61.3244 1.8200e- 003 1.6200e- 003 61.8520 1.8200e- 003 1.6200e- 003 61.8520 Total 0.0251 0.0159 0.2252 6.1000e-004 0.0657 3.6000e- 004 0.0661 0.0174 3.3000e- 004 0.0178 3.3000e- 004 0.0178 61.3244 61.32446.1000e-004 0.0657 3.6000e- 004 0.0661 0.0174Worker0.0251 0.0159 0.2252 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Category lb/day lb/day CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1 Date: 10/20/2021 3:39 PM MacDonald's Without Drive Through - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 4.5000e- 004 4.0000e- 004 15.46308.0000e- 005 4.4400e-003 15.3311 15.33111.5000e-004 0.0164 9.0000e- 005 0.0165 4.3600e-003Worker6.2800e-003 3.9900e-003 0.0563 23.2731 23.2731 5.5000e- 004 3.4500e- 003 24.3157 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 3.3500e-003 0.0643 0.0190 2.2000e-004 6.7700e- 003 1.0700e- 003 7.8500e-003 1.9500e-003 1.0300e- 003 2.9800e-003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 1,103.2158 1,103.2158 0.3568 1,112.1358 0.3568 1,112.1358 Total 0.7750 7.9850 7.2637 0.0114 0.4475 0.4475 0.4117 0.4117 0.0000 0.4117 0.4117 0.0000 1,103.2158 1,103.21580.0114 0.4475 0.4475Off-Road 0.7750 7.9850 7.2637 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 38.6042 38.6042 1.0000e- 003 3.8500e- 003 39.7787 4.5000e- 004 4.0000e- 004 15.4630 Total 9.6300e-003 0.0683 0.0753 3.7000e-004 0.0232 1.1600e- 003 0.0244 6.3100e-003 1.1100e- 003 7.4200e-003 8.0000e- 005 4.4400e-003 15.3311 15.33111.5000e-004 0.0164 9.0000e- 005 0.0165 4.3600e-003Worker6.2800e-003 3.9900e-003 0.0563 23.2731 23.2731 5.5000e- 004 3.4500e- 003 24.3157Vendor3.3500e-003 0.0643 0.0190 2.2000e-004 6.7700e- 003 1.0700e- 003 7.8500e-003 1.9500e-003 1.0300e- 003 2.9800e-003 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1 Date: 10/20/2021 3:39 PM MacDonald's Without Drive Through - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 37.5638 37.5638 9.0000e- 004 3.7300e- 003 38.6998 4.1000e- 004 3.7000e- 004 14.9866 Total 7.9800e-003 0.0575 0.0677 3.6000e-004 0.0232 6.6000e- 004 0.0239 6.3100e-003 6.3000e- 004 6.9400e-003 8.0000e- 005 4.4400e-003 14.8652 14.86521.5000e-004 0.0164 9.0000e- 005 0.0165 4.3600e-003Worker5.8200e-003 3.5100e-003 0.0516 22.6986 22.6986 4.9000e- 004 3.3600e- 003 23.7132 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 2.1600e-003 0.0539 0.0160 2.1000e-004 6.7700e- 003 5.7000e- 004 7.3500e-003 1.9500e-003 5.5000e- 004 2.5000e-003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 1,103.9393 1,103.9393 0.3570 1,112.8652 0.3570 1,112.8652 Total 0.6863 7.0258 7.1527 0.0114 0.3719 0.3719 0.3422 0.3422 0.3422 0.3422 1,103.9393 1,103.93930.0114 0.3719 0.3719Off-Road 0.6863 7.0258 7.1527 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 3.5 Building Construction - 2022 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 38.6042 38.6042 1.0000e- 003 3.8500e- 003 39.7787Total9.6300e-003 0.0683 0.0753 3.7000e-004 0.0232 1.1600e- 003 0.0244 6.3100e-003 1.1100e- 003 7.4200e-003 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1 Date: 10/20/2021 3:39 PM MacDonald's Without Drive Through - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 3.6 Paving - 2022 Unmitigated Construction On-Site 37.5638 37.5638 9.0000e- 004 3.7300e- 003 38.6998 4.1000e- 004 3.7000e- 004 14.9866 Total 7.9800e-003 0.0575 0.0677 3.6000e-004 0.0232 6.6000e- 004 0.0239 6.3100e-003 6.3000e- 004 6.9400e-003 8.0000e- 005 4.4400e-003 14.8652 14.86521.5000e-004 0.0164 9.0000e- 005 0.0165 4.3600e-003Worker5.8200e-003 3.5100e-003 0.0516 22.6986 22.6986 4.9000e- 004 3.3600e- 003 23.7132 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 2.1600e-003 0.0539 0.0160 2.1000e-004 6.7700e- 003 5.7000e- 004 7.3500e-003 1.9500e-003 5.5000e- 004 2.5000e-003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 1,103.9393 1,103.9393 0.3570 1,112.8652 0.3570 1,112.8652 Total 0.6863 7.0258 7.1527 0.0114 0.3719 0.3719 0.3422 0.3422 0.0000 0.3422 0.3422 0.0000 1,103.9393 1,103.93930.0114 0.3719 0.3719Off-Road 0.6863 7.0258 7.1527 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1 Date: 10/20/2021 3:39 PM MacDonald's Without Drive Through - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied Mitigated Construction On-Site 133.7866 133.7866 3.6700e- 003 3.3600e- 003 134.8789 3.6700e- 003 3.3600e- 003 134.8789 Total 0.0524 0.0316 0.4647 1.3200e-003 0.1479 7.7000e- 004 0.1486 0.0392 7.1000e- 004 0.0399 7.1000e- 004 0.0399 133.7866 133.78661.3200e-003 0.1479 7.7000e- 004 0.1486 0.0392Worker0.0524 0.0316 0.4647 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2SO2Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 ROG NOx CO 0.3017 1,043.3677 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site 0.2758 0.2758 1,035.8246 1,035.82460.0113 0.2961 0.2961Total0.6469 5.9174 7.0348 0.0000 0.0000 0.3017 1,043.3677 Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2758 0.2758 1,035.8246 1,035.82460.0113 0.2961 0.2961Off-Road 0.6469 5.9174 7.0348 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1 Date: 10/20/2021 3:39 PM MacDonald's Without Drive Through - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied N2O CO2ePM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2022 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 133.7866 133.7866 3.6700e- 003 3.3600e- 003 134.8789 3.6700e- 003 3.3600e- 003 134.8789 Total 0.0524 0.0316 0.4647 1.3200e-003 0.1479 7.7000e- 004 0.1486 0.0392 7.1000e- 004 0.0399 7.1000e- 004 0.0399 133.7866 133.78661.3200e-003 0.1479 7.7000e- 004 0.1486 0.0392Worker0.0524 0.0316 0.4647 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2SO2Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 ROG NOx CO 0.3017 1,043.3677 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 0.2758 0.2758 0.0000 1,035.8246 1,035.82460.0113 0.2961 0.2961Total0.6469 5.9174 7.0348 0.0000 0.0000 0.3017 1,043.3677 Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2758 0.2758 0.0000 1,035.8246 1,035.82460.0113 0.2961 0.2961Off-Road 0.6469 5.9174 7.0348 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1 Date: 10/20/2021 3:39 PM MacDonald's Without Drive Through - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Worker0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2SO2Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 ROG NOx CO 0.0183 281.9062 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site 0.0817 0.0817 281.4481 281.44812.9700e-003 0.0817 0.0817Total9.1107 1.4085 1.8136 281.4481 281.4481 0.0183 281.9062 0.0000 Off-Road 0.2045 1.4085 1.8136 2.9700e-003 0.0817 0.0817 0.0817 0.0817 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000Archit. Coating 8.9062 Category lb/day lb/day CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1 Date: 10/20/2021 3:39 PM MacDonald's Without Drive Through - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied CO2eBio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2OExhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2 5 Exhaust PM2 5 PM2.5 Total 4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Worker0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2SO2Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 ROG NOx CO 0.0183 281.9062 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 0.0817 0.0817 0.0000 281.4481 281.44812.9700e-003 0.0817 0.0817Total9.1107 1.4085 1.8136 281.4481 281.4481 0.0183 281.9062 0.0000 Off-Road 0.2045 1.4085 1.8136 2.9700e-003 0.0817 0.0817 0.0817 0.0817 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000Archit. Coating 8.9062 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1 Date: 10/20/2021 3:39 PM MacDonald's Without Drive Through - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied N2O CO2ePM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 Historical Energy Use: N 5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 0.000579 0.026545 0.000826 0.002928 5.0 Energy Detail 0.023262 0.005577 0.010166 0.007476 0.001000Fast Food Restaurant w/o Drive Thru 0.552821 0.058334 0.189005 0.121481 OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MHMDVLHD1LHD2MHDHHD 4.4 Fleet Mix Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 79.50 19.00 51 37 12Fast Food Restaurant w/o Drive Thru 9.50 7.30 7.30 1.50 H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-byLand Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W 2,879,340 4.3 Trip Type Information Miles Trip %Trip Purpose % Total 1,478.40 2,971.92 2,135.00 2,879,340 Annual VMT Fast Food Restaurant w/o Drive Thru 1,478.40 2,971.92 2135.00 2,879,340 2,879,340 Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT 0.4982 10,303.740 9 4.2 Trip Summary Information Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated 2.7547 10,137.5580 10,137.558 0 0.709310.0863 0.0735 10.1598 2.6863 0.0685Unmitigated7.0149 5.7418 50.0134 0.0997 10,137.5580 10,137.558 0 0.7093 0.4982 10,303.740 9 Category lb/day lb/day Mitigated 7.0149 5.7418 50.0134 0.0997 10.0863 0.0735 10.1598 2.6863 0.0685 2.7547 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1 Date: 10/20/2021 3:39 PM MacDonald's Without Drive Through - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 4.2300e- 003 231.92950.0146 230.5594 230.5594 4.4200e-003 230.5594 4.4200e-003 4.2300e- 003 231.9295 Total 0.0211 0.1921 0.1614 1.1500e- 003 0.0146 0.0146 0.0146 0.0146 0.0146 230.55940.1614 1.1500e- 003 0.0146 0.0146Fast Food Restaurant w/o Drive Thru 1.95975 0.0211 0.1921 N2O CO2e Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 4.2300e- 003 231.9295 Mitigated NaturalGas Use ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 0.0146 230.5594 230.5594 4.4200e-003 230.5594 4.4200e-003 4.2300e- 003 231.9295 Total 0.0211 0.1921 0.1614 1.1500e- 003 0.0146 0.0146 0.0146 0.0146 0.0146 230.55940.1614 1.1500e- 003 0.0146 0.0146Fast Food Restaurant w/o Drive Thru 1959.75 0.0211 0.1921 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas Unmitigated NaturalGas Use ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 230.5594 230.5594 4.4200e- 003 4.2300e-003 231.9295 4.4200e- 003 4.2300e-003 231.9295 NaturalGas Unmitigated 0.0211 0.1921 0.1614 1.1500e-003 0.0146 0.0146 0.0146 0.0146 0.0146 0.0146 230.5594 230.55941.1500e-003 0.0146 0.0146NaturalGas Mitigated 0.0211 0.1921 0.1614 Category lb/day lb/day CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1 Date: 10/20/2021 3:39 PM MacDonald's Without Drive Through - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 9.3000e- 004 9.3000e- 004 0.0000 1.0000e- 003 0.0000 1.0000e- 003 Total 0.1036 0.0000 4.4000e-004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 9.3000e- 004 9.3000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Landscaping4.0000e- 005 0.0000 4.4000e-004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer Products 0.0914 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000Architectural Coating 0.0122 CH4 N2O CO2e SubCategory lb/day lb/day Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2SO2Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 ROG NOx CO 0.0000 1.0000e- 003 6.2 Area by SubCategory Unmitigated 1.0000e- 003 Unmitigated 0.1036 0.0000 4.4000e-004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 9.3000e- 004 9.3000e- 004 9.3000e- 004 9.3000e- 004 0.0000 CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Mitigated 0.1036 0.0000 4.4000e-004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O 6.0 Area Detail 6.1 Mitigation Measures Area ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1 Date: 10/20/2021 3:39 PM MacDonald's Without Drive Through - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied Load Factor Fuel Type 10.0 Stationary Equipment Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power 7.0 Water Detail 7.1 Mitigation Measures Water 8.0 Waste Detail 8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste 9.0 Operational Offroad 9.3000e- 004 9.3000e- 004 0.0000 1.0000e- 003 0.0000 1.0000e- 003 Total 0.1036 0.0000 4.4000e-004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 9.3000e- 004 9.3000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Landscaping4.0000e- 005 0.0000 4.4000e-004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer Products 0.0914 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000Architectural Coating 0.0122 N2O CO2e SubCategory lb/day lb/day PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 Mitigated ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1 Date: 10/20/2021 3:39 PM MacDonald's Without Drive Through - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 11.0 Vegetation Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment Equipment Type Number Boilers Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type 0.4433 3.8500e- 003 1,437.95410.5872 3.1732 0.0000 1,426.3892 1,426.38920.0147 5.3777 0.6383 6.0159 2.586020211.3135 14.3467 7.8506 N2O CO2e Year lb/day lb/day PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission) Unmitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 2.0 Emissions Summary Water Mitigation - 0.004 1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data Project Characteristics - Land Use - Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - CO2 Intensity (lb/MWhr) 203.98 CH4 Intensity (lb/MWhr) 0.033 N2O Intensity (lb/MWhr) Climate Zone 5 Operational Year 2023 Utility Company Pacific Gas and Electric Company 0 1.2 Other Project Characteristics Urbanization Urban Wind Speed (m/s)2.2 Precipitation Freq (Days)64 Fast Food Restaurant with Drive Thru 4.27 1000sqft 0.10 4,270.00 MacDonald's Drive Through Addition CUP Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer 1.0 Project Characteristics 1.1 Land Usage Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1 Date: 10/20/2021 3:25 PM MacDonald's Drive Through Addition CUP - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1 Date: 10/20/2021 3:25 PM MacDonald's Drive Through Addition CUP - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 4.4 Fleet Mix 78.80 19.00 29 21 50Fast Food Restaurant with Drive Thru 9.50 7.30 7.30 2.20 H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-byLand Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W 1,962,554 4.3 Trip Type Information Miles Trip %Trip Purpose % Total 2,010.96 2,630.83 2,017.92 1,962,554 Annual VMT Fast Food Restaurant with Drive Thru 2,010.96 2,630.83 2017.92 1,962,554 1,962,554 Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT 0.3184 5,466.1586 4.2 Trip Summary Information Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated 1.4170 5,359.0707 5,359.0707 0.48875.1733 0.0422 5.2154 1.3778 0.0392Unmitigated5.4163 3.6330 30.7174 0.0527 CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2OExhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2 5 Exhaust PM2 5 PM2.5 Total 4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 5,589.6310 5,589.6310 0.4931 0.3226 5,698.0890 0.4887 0.3184 5,466.1586 Total 5.5410 3.8251 30.8792 0.0539 5.1733 0.0568 5.2300 1.3778 0.0538 1.4316 0.0392 1.4170 5,359.0707 5,359.07070.0527 5.1733 0.0422 5.2154 1.3778Mobile5.4163 3.6330 30.7174 230.5594 230.5594 4.4200e- 003 4.2300e-003 231.9295 0.0000 1.0000e- 003 Energy 0.0211 0.1921 0.1614 1.1500e-003 0.0146 0.0146 0.0146 0.0146 0.0000 0.0000 9.3000e- 004 9.3000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Area0.1036 0.0000 4.4000e-004 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 2.2 Overall Operational Unmitigated Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 0.4433 3.8500e- 003 1,437.95410.5872 3.1732 0.0000 1,426.3892 1,426.38920.0147 5.3777 0.6383 6.0159 2.5860Maximum9.1107 14.3467 7.8506 1,169.6112 1,169.6112 0.3579 3.7300e- 003 1,178.246620229.1107 7.0832 7.4995 0.0126 0.1479 0.3726 0.4447 0.0392 0.3428 0.3491 0.0000 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1 Date: 10/20/2021 3:25 PM MacDonald's Drive Through Addition CUP - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000Architectural Coating 0.0122 CH4 N2O CO2e SubCategory lb/day lb/day Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2SO2Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 ROG NOx CO 0.0000 1.0000e- 003 6.2 Area by SubCategory Unmitigated Unmitigated 0.1036 0.0000 4.4000e-004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 9.3000e- 004 9.3000e- 004 CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O 6.0 Area Detail ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total 4.2300e- 003 231.92950.0146 230.5594 230.5594 4.4200e-003 230.5594 4.4200e-003 4.2300e- 003 231.9295 Total 0.0211 0.1921 0.1614 1.1500e- 003 0.0146 0.0146 0.0146 0.0146 0.0146 230.55940.1614 1.1500e- 003 0.0146 0.0146Fast Food Restaurant with Drive Thru 1959.75 0.0211 0.1921 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas Unmitigated NaturalGas Use ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 230.5594 230.5594 4.4200e- 003 4.2300e-003 231.9295NaturalGas Unmitigated 0.0211 0.1921 0.1614 1.1500e-003 0.0146 0.0146 0.0146 0.0146 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 Historical Energy Use: N ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 0.000579 0.026545 0.000826 0.002928 5.0 Energy Detail 0.023262 0.005577 0.010166 0.007476 0.001000Fast Food Restaurant with Drive Thru 0.552821 0.058334 0.189005 0.121481 OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MHMDVLHD1LHD2MHDHHDLand Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1 Date: 10/20/2021 3:25 PM MacDonald's Drive Through Addition CUP - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 9.3000e- 004 9.3000e- 004 0.0000 1.0000e- 003 0.0000 1.0000e- 003 Total 0.1036 0.0000 4.4000e-004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 9.3000e- 004 9.3000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Landscaping4.0000e- 005 0.0000 4.4000e-004 0.0000 0.0000Consumer Products 0.0914 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 MacDonald's Without Drive Through Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual 1.0 Project Characteristics 1.1 Land Usage Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1 Date: 10/20/2021 3:37 PM MacDonald's Without Drive Through - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied Climate Zone 5 Operational Year 2023 Utility Company Pacific Gas and Electric Company 0 1.2 Other Project Characteristics Urbanization Urban Wind Speed (m/s)2.2 Precipitation Freq (Days)64 Fast Food Restaurant w/o Drive Thru 4.27 1000sqft 0.10 4,270.00 2.0 Emissions Summary Water Mitigation - 0.004 1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data Project Characteristics - Land Use - Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - CO2 Intensity (lb/MWhr) 203.98 CH4 Intensity (lb/MWhr) 0.033 N2O Intensity (lb/MWhr) 8.5200e- 003 0.0828 0.0734 N2O CO2e Year tons/yr MT/yr PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 2.1 Overall Construction Unmitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 2.6600e- 003 2.0000e- 005 10.96064.1200e- 003 6.8600e-003 0.0000 10.8869 10.88691.2000e-004 6.1300e- 003 4.4000e- 003 0.0105 2.7500e- 003 2021 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1 Date: 10/20/2021 3:37 PM MacDonald's Without Drive Through - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 51.3853 51.3853 0.0158 1.7000e- 004 51.831020220.0568 0.3479 0.3588 5.9000e-004 1.4000e- 003 0.0183 0.0197 3.8000e- 004 0.0168 0.0172 0.0000 0.0158 1.7000e- 004 51.83100.0168 0.0172 0.0000 51.3853 51.38535.9000e-004 6.1300e- 003 0.0183 0.0197 2.7500e- 003 Maximum 0.0568 0.3479 0.3588 2.2 Overall Operational Unmitigated Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 8.0000e- 005 8.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Area0.0189 0.0000 4.0000e-005 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 8.0300e- 003 1.0692 0.2835Mobile0.6776 0.6840 5.5982 49.5064 49.5064 2.5700e- 003 9.2000e-004 49.8454 0.0000 0.0000 8.0000e- 005 Energy 3.8600e- 003 0.0351 0.0295 2.1000e-004 2.6600e- 003 2.6600e-003 2.6600e- 003 2.6600e-003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 9.9851 0.5901 0.0000 24.7377 0.0767 0.0523 972.3365 Waste 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 9.9851 7.4800e- 003 0.2910 0.0000 954.8327 954.83270.0104 1.0612 1,005.0149 1,015.4112 0.7117 0.0542 1,049.3662 0.0423 1.0100e-003 2.4465 Total 0.7004 0.7191 5.6277 0.0106 1.0612 0.0107 1.0719 0.2835 0.0101 0.2936 10.3963 0.0000 0.0000 0.4112 0.6757 1.08690.0000 0.0000Water 4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2OExhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Unmitigated 0.6776 0.6840 5.5982 0.0104 1.0612 8.0300e- 003 1.0692 0.2835 7.4800e- 003 0.2910 0.0000 954.8327 954.8327 Annual VMT Fast Food Restaurant w/o Drive Thru 1,478.40 2,971.92 2135.00 2,879,340 2,879,340 Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT 0.0767 0.0523 972.3365 4.2 Trip Summary Information Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated 2,879,340 4.3 Trip Type Information Miles Trip %Trip Purpose % Total 1,478.40 2,971.92 2,135.00 2,879,340 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1 Date: 10/20/2021 3:37 PM MacDonald's Without Drive Through - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-byLand Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MHMDVLHD1LHD2MHDHHD 4.4 Fleet Mix Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 79.50 19.00 51 37 12Fast Food Restaurant w/o Drive Thru 9.50 7.30 7.30 1.50 Historical Energy Use: N 0.000579 0.026545 0.000826 0.002928 5.0 Energy Detail 0.023262 0.005577 0.010166 0.007476 0.001000Fast Food Restaurant w/o Drive Thru 0.552821 0.058334 0.189005 0.121481 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas Unmitigated NaturalGas Use ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 38.1717 7.3000e-004 7.0000e- 004 38.3985 Total 3.8600e-003 0.0351 0.0295 2.1000e- 004 2.6600e-003 2.6600e- 003 2.6600e- 003 2.6600e- 003 2.6600e-003 0.0000 38.17170.0295 2.1000e- 004 2.6600e-003 2.6600e- 003 Fast Food Restaurant w/o Drive Thru 715310 3.8600e-003 0.0351 7.0000e- 004 38.39852.6600e-003 0.0000 38.1717 38.1717 7.3000e-004 5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity Unmitigated Electricity Use Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e 2.2000e-004 11.4468Total11.3347 1.8300e-003 Land Use kWh/yr t o n MT/yr Fast Food Restaurant w/o Drive Thru 122506 11.3347 1.8300e-003 2.2000e-004 11.4468 6.0 Area Detail 6.2 Area by SubCategory Unmitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1 Date: 10/20/2021 3:37 PM MacDonald's Without Drive Through - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 0.0000 0.0000Architectural Coating 2.2300e- 003 CH4 N2O CO2e SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2SO2Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 ROG NOx CO 0.0000 0.0000 4.0000e-005 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer Products 0.0167 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 8.0000e- 005 8.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0000 8.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0000 8.0000e- 005 Total 0.0189 0.0000 4.0000e-005 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 8.0000e- 005 8.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Landscaping 7.0 Water Detail 7.2 Water by Land Use Unmitigated Indoor/Out door Use Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e 1.0100e-003 2.4465Total1.0869 0.0423 Land Use Mgal t o n MT/yr Fast Food Restaurant w/o Drive Thru 1.29609 / 0.0827291 1.0869 0.0423 1.0100e-003 2.4465 8.0 Waste Detail 8.2 Waste by Land Use Unmitigated Waste Disposed Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e 0.0000 24.7377Total9.9851 0.5901 Land Use tons t o n MT/yr Fast Food Restaurant w/o Drive Thru 49.19 9.9851 0.5901 0.0000 24.7377 N2O CO2ePM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 2.1 Overall Construction Unmitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 tblConstDustMitigation WaterUnpavedRoadVehicleSpeed 0 5 2.0 Emissions Summary Water Mitigation - Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value 0.004 1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data Project Characteristics - Land Use - Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - CO2 Intensity (lb/MWhr) 203.98 CH4 Intensity (lb/MWhr) 0.033 N2O Intensity (lb/MWhr) Climate Zone 5 Operational Year 2023 Utility Company Pacific Gas and Electric Company 0 1.2 Other Project Characteristics Urbanization Urban Wind Speed (m/s)2.2 Precipitation Freq (Days)64 Fast Food Restaurant with Drive Thru 4.27 1000sqft 0.10 4,270.00 MacDonald's Drive Through Addition CUP Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual 1.0 Project Characteristics 1.1 Land Usage Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1 Date: 10/20/2021 3:30 PM MacDonald's Drive Through Addition CUP - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1 Date: 10/20/2021 3:30 PM MacDonald's Drive Through Addition CUP - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied Annual VMTLand Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT 0.0719 0.0447 687.2786 4.2 Trip Summary Information Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated Unmitigated 0.6795 0.5758 4.7462 7.2800e-003 0.7233 6.1200e- 003 0.7294 0.1932 5.6900e- 003 0.1989 0.0000 672.1756 672.1756 CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2OExhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total 4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 722.3577 732.7541 0.7069 0.0466 764.3083 0.0423 1.0100e-003 2.4465 Total 0.7023 0.6109 4.7757 7.4900e-003 0.7233 8.7800e- 003 0.7321 0.1932 8.3500e- 003 0.2016 10.3963 0.0000 0.0000 0.4112 0.6757 1.08690.0000 0.0000Water 0.0000 9.9851 0.5901 0.0000 24.7377 0.0719 0.0447 687.2786 Waste 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 9.9851 5.6900e- 003 0.1989 0.0000 672.1756 672.17567.2800e-003 0.7233 6.1200e- 003 0.7294 0.1932Mobile0.6795 0.5758 4.7462 49.5064 49.5064 2.5700e- 003 9.2000e-004 49.8454 0.0000 0.0000 8.0000e- 005 Energy 3.8600e- 003 0.0351 0.0295 2.1000e-004 2.6600e- 003 2.6600e-003 2.6600e- 003 2.6600e-003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 8.0000e- 005 8.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Area0.0189 0.0000 4.0000e-005 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 2.2 Overall Operational Unmitigated Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 0.0158 1.7000e- 004 51.83100.0168 0.0172 0.0000 51.3853 51.38535.9000e-004 6.1300e- 003 0.0183 0.0197 2.7500e- 003 Maximum 0.0568 0.3479 0.3588 51.3853 51.3853 0.0158 1.7000e- 004 51.8310 2.6600e- 003 2.0000e- 005 10.9606 2022 0.0568 0.3479 0.3588 5.9000e-004 1.4000e- 003 0.0183 0.0197 3.8000e- 004 0.0168 0.0172 0.0000 4.1200e- 003 6.8600e-003 0.0000 10.8869 10.88691.2000e-004 6.1300e- 003 4.4000e- 003 0.0105 2.7500e- 003 2021 8.5200e- 003 0.0828 0.0734 Year tons/yr MT/yr CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1 Date: 10/20/2021 3:30 PM MacDonald's Drive Through Addition CUP - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity Unmitigated 7.0000e- 004 38.39852.6600e-003 0.0000 38.1717 38.1717 7.3000e-004 38.1717 7.3000e-004 7.0000e- 004 38.3985 Total 3.8600e-003 0.0351 0.0295 2.1000e- 004 2.6600e-003 2.6600e- 003 2.6600e- 003 2.6600e- 003 2.6600e-003 0.0000 38.17170.0295 2.1000e- 004 2.6600e-003 2.6600e- 003 Fast Food Restaurant with Drive Thru 715310 3.8600e-003 0.0351 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas Unmitigated NaturalGas Use ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 38.1717 38.1717 7.3000e- 004 7.0000e-004 38.3985NaturalGas Unmitigated 3.8600e- 003 0.0351 0.0295 2.1000e-004 2.6600e- 003 2.6600e-003 2.6600e- 003 2.6600e-003 0.0000 11.3347 11.3347 1.8300e- 003 2.2000e-004 11.4468Electricity Unmitigated 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 Historical Energy Use: N ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 0.000579 0.026545 0.000826 0.002928 5.0 Energy Detail 0.023262 0.005577 0.010166 0.007476 0.001000Fast Food Restaurant with Drive Thru 0.552821 0.058334 0.189005 0.121481 OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MHMDVLHD1LHD2MHDHHD 4.4 Fleet Mix Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 78.80 19.00 29 21 50Fast Food Restaurant with Drive Thru 9.50 7.30 7.30 2.20 H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-byLand Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W 1,962,554 4.3 Trip Type Information Miles Trip %Trip Purpose % Total 2,010.96 2,630.83 2,017.92 1,962,554 Fast Food Restaurant with Drive Thru 2,010.96 2,630.83 2017.92 1,962,554 1,962,554 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1 Date: 10/20/2021 3:30 PM MacDonald's Drive Through Addition CUP - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 2.4465 7.2 Water by Land Use Unmitigated 1.0869 0.0423 1.0100e-003 Category t o n MT/yr 7.0 Water Detail Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e 8.0000e- 005 8.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0000 8.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0000 8.0000e- 005 Total 0.0189 0.0000 4.0000e-005 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 8.0000e- 005 8.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Landscaping0.0000 0.0000 4.0000e-005 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer Products 0.0167 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000Architectural Coating 2.2300e- 003 CH4 N2O CO2e SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2SO2Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 ROG NOx CO 0.0000 0.0000 8.0000e- 005 6.2 Area by SubCategory Unmitigated Unmitigated 0.0189 0.0000 4.0000e-005 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 8.0000e- 005 8.0000e- 005 CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2OExhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total 6.0 Area Detail ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 2.2000e-004 11.4468Total11.3347 1.8300e-003 Land Use kWh/yr t o n MT/yr Fast Food Restaurant with Drive Thru 122506 11.3347 1.8300e-003 2.2000e-004 11.4468 Electricity Use Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1 Date: 10/20/2021 3:30 PM MacDonald's Drive Through Addition CUP - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 0.0000 24.7377Total9.9851 0.5901 Land Use tons t o n MT/yr Fast Food Restaurant with Drive Thru 49.19 9.9851 0.5901 0.0000 24.7377 24.7377 8.2 Waste by Land Use Unmitigated Waste Disposed Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Unmitigated 9.9851 0.5901 0.0000 CO2e t o n MT/yr Total CO2 CH4 N2O 8.0 Waste Detail 1.0100e-003 2.4465Total1.0869 0.0423 Land Use Mgal t o n MT/yr Fast Food Restaurant with Drive Thru 1.29609 / 0.0827291 1.0869 0.0423 1.0100e-003 2.4465 Unmitigated Indoor/Out door Use Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e EMC Planning Group Inc. 1  3. AIR QUALITY Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality  management district or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the  following determinations. Would the project:  Comments: a.  The Town of Los Gatos is within the San Francisco Bay Area Air Basin and the  boundary of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District (air district). The air  district adopted the current version of the Clean Air Plan in 2017 (Clean Air Plan).  Consistency with the Clean Air Plan is based on conformance with air quality control  measures presented in the Clean Air Plan. The air district’s Air Quality CEQA  Guidelines (2017) (“air district CEQA guidelines”) Section 9.1 provides guidance on  determining if a development project is consistent with the Clean Air Plan. For  consistency a project should meet three criteria: 1) support the primary goals of the  Clean Air Plan; 2) include applicable Clean Air Plan control measures; and 3) not  disrupt or hinder implementation of any Clean Air Plan control measures.  The primary goals of the Clean Air Plan are to attain air quality standards; to reduce  population exposure to pollutants and protect public health in the Bay Area; and to  reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and protect the climate. This is considered  to have been accomplished if there are no project‐level significant impacts, or if  significant impacts are mitigated to a less‐than‐significant level.   Potentially Significant Impact Less-than-Significant Impact with Mitigation Measures Incorporated Less-Than- Significant Impact No Impact a. Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the  applicable air quality plan?   ☐ ☐ ☐ ☒ b. Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase  of any criteria pollutant for which the project  region is nonattainment under an applicable  federal or state ambient air quality standard?   ☐ ☐ ☒ ☐ c. Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant  concentrations?   ☐ ☐ ☒ ☐ d. Result in other emissions, such as those leading to  odors adversely affecting a substantial number of  people?  ☐ ☐ ☐ ☒ 15475 Los Gatos Boulevard – McDonalds Drive‐Through Initial Study   2 EMC Planning Group Inc.  Construction emissions would be minimal and short‐lived. The potential for receptor  exposures to substantial concentrations of harmful pollutants during construction is  quite low, due to the nature of construction activities, which do not include grading  or paving activities that require large numbers of diesel‐powered equipment.  Receptor exposures are discussed in greater detail in section “c”, below.   For operational activities, model results show that operational emissions would  decrease with the addition of a drive‐through lane, which would result in a beneficial  impact. The change in operational emissions is discussed more thoroughly in section  “b”, below.  There are 81 control measures in the Clean Air Plan, many of which are applicable  only for industrial or regional implementation. Clean Air Plan Control measures  potentially applicable to the proposed project are presented below in Table 1,  Potentially Applicable Control Measures (Clean Air Plan) along with a brief  consistency analysis to determine how the project either does or does not implement  the measure.   Table 1 Potentially Applicable Control Measures (Clean Air Plan)  Control Measure Number and Name Consistency Analysis SS Fugitive Dust Consistent. The proposed project does not include grading or paving, but has the potential to generate minimal, less than significant fugitive dust emissions during construction of the improvements. SS40 Odors Consistent. Substantial odors are typically associated with large-scale operations such as wastewater facilities or solid waste collection and disposal. The proposed project adds a drive-through lane to an existing fast food business. Odor generation would be no different than existing conditions. TR16: Indirect Source Review Consistent. This measure reduces emissions of key ozone precursors, ROG and NOx, particulate matter, toxic air contaminants and GHGs by reducing construction and operational emissions associated with new or modified land uses. On-road and off-road mobile emission sources are the main source categories targeted by this measure. This reduces region-wide population exposure to air pollutants and also reduces localized population exposure to air pollution. The proposed project would not emit criteria pollutant or toxic air contaminant (TACs) emissions volumes that would exceed air district standards for regional air quality or result in exposures to substantial concentrations of TACs. The potential for sensitive receptor exposures to construction TAC emissions and associated health risks are discussed in item “c” of this section. TR22 Construction, Freight, and Farming Equipment Consistent. Through this control measure, the air district works with local communities and contractors to encourage retrofitting engines with diesel particulate filters or upgrading to equipment with electric or Tier IV off-road engines. The control measure reduces key ozone precursors, ROG and NOx, and toxic air contaminant emissions such as diesel particulate matter and greenhouse gases through the installation of abatement devices on existing diesel equipment and other financial incentives to replace older equipment. The project qualifies for this program. SOURCE: BAAQMD 2017a 15475 Los Gatos Boulevard – McDonalds Drive‐Through Initial Study  EMC Planning Group Inc. 3  The proposed project would not result in significant air quality impacts, and supports  the primary goals of the Clean Air Plan. Refer to the related discussion in sections  “b”, “c”, and “d” below.   b. The six most common and widespread air pollutants of concern, or “criteria  pollutants,” are ground‐level ozone, nitrogen dioxide, particulate matter, carbon  monoxide, sulfur dioxide, and lead. In addition, reactive organic gases are a key  contributor to the criteria air pollutants because they react with other substances to  form ground‐level ozone. Health effects of criteria air pollutants include asthma,  bronchitis, chest pain, coughing, and heart diseases.  The air district is the agency with the primary responsibility for assuring that national  and state ambient air quality standards are attained and maintained in the air basin.  Depending on whether or not the standards are met or exceeded, the air basin is  classified as being in “attainment” or “nonattainment.” Table 2, San Francisco Bay  Area Air Basin Attainment Status, identifies the current attainment status within the  air basin for each criteria pollutant.  Table 2 San Francisco Bay Area Air Basin Attainment Status Criteria Air Pollutants State Standards National Standards Ozone Non-attainment Non-attainment Respirable Particulate Matter Non-attainment Unclassified Fine Particulate Matter Non-attainment Non-attainment Carbon Monoxide Attainment Attainment Nitrogen Dioxide Attainment Unclassified/Attainment Sulfur Dioxide Attainment Unclassified/Attainment Lead - Attainment SOURCE: Bay Area Air Quality Management District 2017a Operational Emissions  The air district has developed thresholds of significance that are used to determine  whether or not a proposed project would result in a cumulatively considerable net  increase of criteria air pollutants during operations and/or construction. The  thresholds used to determine the significance of air quality impacts are contained in  the air district CEQA Guidelines. Criteria air pollutant emissions generated during  construction and operations of the existing and proposed project were estimated  using CalEEMod version 2020.4.0. The results are weighed against the air district  thresholds in Table 3, Unmitigated Operational Criteria Air Pollutant Emissions.  CalEEMod modeling results are included in Attachment A.  15475 Los Gatos Boulevard – McDonalds Drive‐Through Initial Study   4 EMC Planning Group Inc.  Table 3 Unmitigated Operational Criteria Air Pollutant Emissions   Source ROG1 NOx1 PM101,2,3 PM2.51,2,3 Without Drive-through4 7.14 5.93 10.17 2.77 With Drive-through4 5.54 3.83 5.23 1.43 Difference with Drive- through -1.60 -2.1 -4.94 -1.34 Air District Thresholds 54 54 82 54 Exceeds Thresholds? NO NO NO NO SOURCE: EMC Planning Group 2021, Bay Area Air Quality Management District 2017b NOTES: 1. Results are rounded and may vary. 2. Pounds per day. 3. The thresholds of significance for particulate matter emissions from project construction apply to exhaust emissions only. The air district recommends implementation of best management practices to reduce fugitive dust emissions. 4. Summer. The model results show that project operations would not result in criteria air  pollutant emissions that exceed the air district thresholds for criteria air pollutants.  Mobile sources are shown to generate the greatest volumes of operational emissions.  The difference in modeled emissions between existing and proposed conditions  reflect reduced emissions associated with fewer engine starts that would occur with  the installation of a drive‐through window. The reduced operational emissions  generated by the proposed project would be a beneficial impact.   Construction Emissions  The 2017 Clean Air Plan discussion of control measure TR22 reports that  construction, freight and farming equipment contribute approximately 15 percent of  the regional inventory of NOx emissions, and five percent of PM2.5 emissions.  Construction equipment is also a contributor to local exposures of DPM. The  proposed project would generate criteria pollutant emissions during construction,  associated with alterations to the building, installing signage and restriping the  parking lot. Due to the short duration and limited construction activity, diesel  exhaust emissions from equipment exhaust and architectural coatings would be  minimal and less than significant.  c.  Toxic air contaminants (TACs) are pollutants that may be expected to result in an  increase in mortality or serious illness or may pose a present or potential hazard to  human health. Health effects include cancer, birth defects, neurological damage,  damage to the bodyʹs natural defense system, and diseases that lead to death. TACs  are found in ambient air, especially in urban areas, and are caused by industry,  agriculture, fuels combustion, and commercial operations (e.g., dry cleaners). Diesel  15475 Los Gatos Boulevard – McDonalds Drive‐Through Initial Study  EMC Planning Group Inc. 5  exhaust is the predominant TAC in urban air and is estimated to represent about two‐ thirds of the cancer risk from TACs.  Construction equipment and associated heavy‐duty truck traffic generates diesel  exhaust and fugitive dust (PM2.5) that poses health risks for sensitive receptors. Diesel  particulate matter (DPM), which is a known TAC, is a component of diesel exhaust.  The primary community risk impact issues associated with construction emissions  are cancer risk (DPM exposures) and exposure to PM2.5. The air district requires an  analysis of construction emissions exposures when construction activity would occur  within 1,000 feet of sensitive receptors, or, when the project site is located within an  identified Community‐At‐Risk in the air district’s Community Air Risk Evaluation  (CARE) program. Sensitive receptors are generally defined as any residence  including private homes, condominiums, apartments, and living quarters; education  resources such as preschools and kindergarten through grade twelve (K‐12) schools;  daycare centers; and health care facilities such as hospitals or retirement and nursing  homes. The nearest receptors to the project site are the residential buildings   The nearest sensitive receptors to the project site are residences located on Benedict  Lane less than 400 feet west of the site. Non‐residential buildings are located between  the project site and residential uses to the west. Additionally, prevailing winds in the  bay area are generally from the north and northwest, which means that in general,  emissions from the project site would be transported to the south and east. The Town  of Los Gatos is not identified as a Community‐At‐Risk in the CARE program, and  although sensitive receptors are present and could be exposed to construction  emissions from activity, the potential for sensitive receptors’ exposures (and related  increase in health risks) to project construction emissions is very limited due to  prevailing winds, the presence of barriers (buildings) between adjacent residences  and the project site, in addition to the short duration and type of emissions‐ generating construction activity as noted previously. This is a less than significant  impact.  d. Land uses creating objectionable odors typically include heavy industrial and some  agricultural practices. The construction of the proposed improvements to the existing  fast food restaurant does not include such practices. Odors generated by the  proposed project would be the same as those generated by the existing use.  15475 Los Gatos Boulevard – McDonalds Drive‐Through Initial Study   6 EMC Planning Group Inc.  Sources  Core States Group. November 2020. Project Plans.   Google, Inc. Google Earth. 2020.   Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD). 2017a. 2017 Clean Air Plan:  Spare the Air, Cool the Climate. https://www.baaqmd.gov/plans‐and‐climate/air‐ quality‐plans/current‐plans.     BAAQMD. May 2017b. California Environmental Quality Act Air Quality  Guidelines. Accessed May 25, 2021.  http://www.baaqmd.gov/~/media/files/planning‐and‐ research/ceqa/ceqa_guidelines_may2017‐pdf.pdf?la=en   EMC Planning Group. 2021. October 20, 2021. CalEEMod 2020.4 Model Results:  Annual and Summer.  MacDonald’s Drive Through Addition CUP.   EXHIBIT 14 EXHIBIT 15 This Page Intentionally Left Blank SINGLE 55” Hot-dipped galvanized frame Aluminum panels Modular Mounting Structure Allows for various screen sizes with panel/mount replacement Option for crane in or manual 2 person assembly Currently designed for the Samsung OHF panel but mounting hardware can be modified for alternate screen specifications in future Modular Range For enquiries and further information on our range of products please visitwww.coatesgroup.comEXHIBIT 16 DOUBLE 55” Hot-dipped galvanized frame Aluminum panels Modular Mounting Structure Allows for various screen sizes with panel/mount replacement Option for crane in or manual 2 person assembly Currently designed for the Samsung OHF panel but mounting hardware can be modified for alternate screen specifications in future Modular Range For enquiries and further information on our range of products please visitwww.coatesgroup.com BASEPLATE Single and double units share the same baseplate detail Baseplate designed for McD existing triple 8 x 8 mounting patterns There is angle adjustment in both directions post-installation to ensure the best screen viewing angle for drivers Single & Double For enquiries and further information on our range of products please visitwww.coatesgroup.com Building and Commercial Services Division St. Paul, MN 55144-1000 1-800-328-0033 www.3M.com/XT1 3M is a trademark of 3M. © 3M 2011. All rights reserved. 1209 DMR 3M™ Wireless Communication System Model XT-1 Technical Data 3M Wireless Communications System Model XT-1’s Night Volume feature to comply with City Decibel Level output ordinance. With the concern over environmental noise today, many communities restrict the audio level of drive-thru intercom systems during normal day-time business hours and for business operations during night time. Usually, this audio level is specified to be below some number at the property line. Audio levels are measured in terms of “Sound Pressure Level” with the unit of change being the “Decibel”. For example, the city of South Plainfield, NJ requires that sound levels not exceed 65 decibels SPL (sound pressure level) in an industrial area. Taking this into consideration, 3M intercom systems provide an adjustable menu speaker volume to assure compliance with city sound ordinances. The 3M XT-1 Intercom System can be adjusted at installation to produce an audio sound pressure level of 65 decibels (*) at a distance of 4 feet on axis to the center of the speaker. It is VERY easy for the installation company to verify this reading using an Audio dB meter (set to A weighing, slow response). Please note that sound diminishes at the rate of 6 decibels every time the distance from the sound source is doubled. So, at a distance of 8 feet, the level is 59 decibels, at 16 feet it is 53 decibels and so on. The 3M XT-1 Intercom System also provides an AUTOMATIC reduction of sound volume for night time operation to maintain compliance with cities that require lower operating sound levels after normal business hours. This feature assures compliance 24 hours a day. To give you a reference of comparative audio levels, please peruse the attached list of typical sound levels. Be aware that acoustic barriers (shrubbery, trees, fences, walls, etc) will reduce the distance faster than shown in the chart. (* These level measurements assume the use of recommended 3M components.) Building and Commercial Services Division St. Paul, MN 55144-1000 1-800-328-0033 www.3M.com/XT1 3M is a trademark of 3M. © 3M 2011. All rights reserved. 1209 DMR Table of Sound Levels and Corresponding Sound Pressure and Sound Intensity To get a feel for decibels, look at the table below which gives values for the sound pressure levels of common sounds in our environment. Also shown are the corresponding sound pressures and sound intensities. From these, you can see that the decibel scale gives numbers in a much more manageable range. Building and Commercial Services Division St. Paul, MN 55144-1000 1-800-328-0033 www.3M.com/XT1 3M is a trademark of 3M. © 3M 2011. All rights reserved. 1209 DMR A given sound pressure level Lp in dBSPL without the distance of the measurement to the specific sound source is useless. The reference for 0 dBSPL sound pressure level is p = 20 μPa = 2 * 10-5 pascal, the threshold of hearing. The sound pressure level decreases in the free field with 6dB per distance doubling. That is the 1/r law. Often it is argued the sound pressure would decrease after the 1/r2 law (inverse square law). That is wrong. The sound pressure in a free field is inversely proportional to the distance from the mic to the source. p ~ 1/r Note: 20 dB is approximately the threshold of hearing. This occurs at approximately 700 feet from the speaker post in a very QUIET environment. In an environment of average traffic noise, a 35 dB limit is virtually inaudible and should be considered the practical limit. This occurs are approximately 125 feet from the speaker post. JSMCDONALD’S File Name: Prepared By:Date: Eng: Customer: Location: - Note: Color output may not be exact when viewing or printing this drawing. All colors used are PMS or the closest CMYK equivalent. If these colors are incorrect, please provide the correct PMS match and a revision to this drawing will be made.700 21st Street Southwest PO Box 210 Watertown, SD 57201-0210 1 .800.843.9888 • www.personasigns.com DISTRIBUTED BY SIGN UP COMPANY WINDSOR, CA 01/31/20 240013 - R8 - 125 WINDSOR RIVER ROAD - WINDSOR, CA ELEVATION SCALE: ½” = 1’-0” 1'-0"8 5/16"6"8'-8"10'-8"9'-0" TO PAVEMENT4'-11 7/16" GRAPHIC DETAIL SCALE: 1/4” = 1’-0” 9" END VIEW SCALE: 1/4” = 1’-0” .080” ALUMINUM CAP 3/4” ROUTED ALUMINUM LETTERS 18 GAUGE STEEL ARM 14 GAUGE CHAIN BLACK ABS BAR 6” X 6” X 3/16” SQUARE TUBE BASE PLATE .080” ALUMINUM SHROUD 4MM ACM SKIN HINGE POLE COVER DETAIL DESIGN FACTOR: TBD 4MM CHARCOAL ACM POLE COVER .080” ALUMINUM CAP AND SHROUD EXTERIOR FINISH: POLE COVER - PRE-FINISHED CHARCOAL SHROUD AND BASE PLATE - MATCH B.M. 1631 MIDNIGHT OIL CLEARANCE BAR DETAIL BLACK ACM PIPE W/ 180-25 GOLD VINYL STRIPES APPLIED TO 1ST SURFACE “DRIVE-THRU” LETTER DETAIL 3/4” ROUTED ALUMINUM LETTERS W/ 1ST SURFACE VINYL DECORATION: 180-25 GOLD - “DRIVE-THRU” COPY BLACK - COPY OUTLINE SQUARE FEET: BOXED = 92.44 ACTUAL = 15.68 SWING ARM DETAIL DESIGN FACTOR: TBD 18 GAUGE STEEL ARM WITH HINGE W/ 1ST SURFACE PAINT AND VINYL DECORATION: MATCH PMS 123 C YELLOW - SWING ARM 7725-12 BLACK - “CLEARANCE 9 FEET” COPY14"14"10"10" 1” X 14” X 14” PLATE 7/8” SLOTTED HOLES 2” CENTER HOLE 3/4” ANCHOR BOLTS BASE PLATE DETAIL SCALE: 1” = 1’-0” FRONT VIEW SCALE: 1/4” = 1’-0” .080” ALUMINUM CAP 3/4” ROUTED ALUMINUM LETTERS 18 GAUGE STEEL ARM 14 GAUGE CHAIN END CAP BLACK ABS BAR 6” X 6” X 3/16” SQUARE TUBE BASE PLATE .080” ALUMINUM SHROUD 4MM ACM SKIN 16 1/16"6"3/4"5"9'-4 1/2"9'-0" TO PAVEMENT10'-8"1'-0" 8'-8" 4'-11 7/16" 1” X 1” X 1/8” ALUMINUM ANGLE GWS R PLATE DETAIL SCALE: 1/2 = 1'-0" PLATE DETAIL SCALE: 1/2 = 1'-0" ISOMETRIC VIEW SCALE: NTS GRAPHIC DETAIL SCALE: 3/16 = 1'-0" CROSS SECTION A-A SCALE: 3/8” = 1'-0" FRAME & LAMP DETAIL SCALE: 3/8” = 1'-0" Order Here 38" 13 1/4" 10" 42"10'-8 11/16"11'-5 11/16"20" 4 2 5 16 10 8 1 16 6 13 12 18 14 15 16 9 7 19 1 12 16 14 9 16 4 10 8 3 2 18 11 17 511 16 28" 11" 4" 11"18"11"8"11"18” X 28” X 1 1/4” PLATE 1 3/8” SLOTTED HOLES 1” BOLTS 11” X 11” X 5/8” PLATE 3/4” HOLES 5/8” BOLTS Order Here 9'-4 3/16" 6'-9"11 3/16"NO.PART/DESCRIPTION 1 2" X 8" X 3/16" RECTANGULAR TUBE 2 2" X 6" X 1/4" RECTANGULAR TUBE 3 2" X 4" X 1/4" RECTANGULAR TUBE 4 3" X 3" X 3/16" SQUARE TUBE 5 1" X 4" X 1/8" RECTANGULAR TUBE 6 C4 ALUMINUM C-CHANNEL 7 1/2" EYEBOLTS (3) 8 11" X 11" X 5/8" TOP PLATES (2) (SEE PLATE DETAILS) 9 18" X 28" X 1 1/4" BASE PLATE (SEE PLATE DETAILS) 10 3" X 3" X 3/4" GUSSETS 11 .063" ALUMINUM SKIN 12 .063" ALUMINUM BENT SP10 SPEAKER BOX HOLDER 13 SPEAKER OPENING 14 .063" ALUMINUM BENT DM 4/DM 5 MICROPHONE BOX HOLDER 15 MICROPHONE OPENING 16 ACM CLADDING 17 SLOAN LED LIGHT WITH POWER SUPPLY 18 REFLECTIVE WHITE 680-10 VINYL 19 ADA STICKER NOTES: -DESIGN FACTOR: TO BE DETERMINED -2" X 8" X 3/16 RECTANGULAR TUBE FRAME -ACM AND .063" ALUMINUM SKIN -EXTERIOR FINISH: BASE PLATE - PAINT BM 1631 MIDNIGHT OIL TUBE AND TOP ACM - PAINT CHARCOAL SPRINGBOARD TIP AND UNDERSIDE - PAINT PMS 123 C GOLD -ACM/SKIN REMOVABLE FOR SERVICE -U.L. LISTED -ELECTRICAL: 0.64 AMPS/120 VOLTS MCDONALD'S SPRINGBOARD OHC SPECIFICATIONSOHC MILL VALLEY, CA 04MAR20 241277 - R3 - 600 REDWOOD HWY - MILL VALLEY, CA SCMCDONALD’S File Name: Prepared By:Date: Eng: Customer: Location: - Note: Color output may not be exact when viewing or printing this drawing. All colors used are PMS or the closest CMYK equivalent. If these colors are incorrect, please provide the correct PMS match and a revision to this drawing will be made.700 21st Street Southwest PO Box 210 Watertown, SD 57201-0210 1 .800.843.9888 • www.personasigns.com DISTRIBUTED BY SIGN UP COMPANY McDonald's USA, LLC4240 East Jurupa St., Suite 402Ontario, CA 91761Phone (909) 467-8907Core-eng.com· · · · · · “ EXHIBIT 17 McDONALD'SGYMNASTICSRETAILMIXED USESTRIP CENTER 386.42'374.9'618.33'MIXED USESTRIP CENTER MEDICAL CENTER/MIXEDUSEDCAR DEALERSHIP1A2345678910111213BCDEFGHIDOCUMENTS PREPARED BY CORESTATES, INC.,INCLUDING THIS DOCUMENT, ARE TO BE USEDONLY FOR THE SPECIFIC PROJECT AND SPECIFICUSE FOR WHICH THEY WERE INTENDED. ANYEXTENSION OF USE TO ANY OTHER PROJECTS,BY OWNER OR BY ANY OTHER PARTY, WITHOUTTHE EXPRESSED WRITTEN CONSENT OFCORESTATES, INC. IS DONE UNLAWFULLY ANDAT THE USERS OWN RISK. IF USED IN A WAYOTHER THAN THAT SPECIFICALLY INTENDED,USER WILL HOLD CORESTATES, INC. HARMLESSFROM ALL CLAIMS AND LOSSES.Drawing: P:\McDonalds\MRP\Los Gatos, CA (15475 Los Gatos Blvd) 004-0582 -MCD.30686\CIVIL\Drawings\Presentation\MCD-30686-P-SITE.dwg ;ExhibitPlot Date/Time: Dec. 06, 21 - 14:59:52User: ZMICHELSSITE LOCATIONENGINEER SEALDOCUMENTREV DATE COMMENT BYCLIENTCHECKED BY:SHEET NO.JOB #:SCALE:DRAWN BY:DATE:SHEET TITLETHE CONTRACTOR IS SPECIFICALLY CAUTIONED THAT THE LOCATION AND/ORELEVATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES AS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS IS BASED ON DESIGNDRAWINGS, RECORDS OF THE VARIOUS UTILITY COMPANIES, AND WHERE POSSIBLE,MEASUREMENTS TAKEN IN THE FIELD. CORE STATES, INC. DOES NOT GUARANTEETHAT LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE EXACT. THE CONTRACTOR MUST CONTACT THEAPPROPRIATE UTILITY COMPANIES AT LEAST 72 HOURS BEFORE ANY EXCAVATION TOREQUEST EXACT FIELD LOCATIONS OF UTILITIES.Call before you dig.below.Know what'sDOCUMENTS PREPARED BY CORESTATES, INC.,INCLUDING THIS DOCUMENT, ARE TO BE USEDONLY FOR THE SPECIFIC PROJECT AND SPECIFICUSE FOR WHICH THEY WERE INTENDED. ANYEXTENSION OF USE TO ANY OTHER PROJECTS,BY OWNER OR BY ANY OTHER PARTY, WITHOUTTHE EXPRESSED WRITTEN CONSENT OFCORESTATES, INC. IS DONE UNLAWFULLY ANDAT THE USERS OWN RISK. IF USED IN A WAYOTHER THAN THAT SPECIFICALLY INTENDED,USER WILL HOLD CORESTATES, INC. HARMLESSFROM ALL CLAIMS AND LOSSES.CLIENTTHE CONTRACTOR IS SPECIFICALLY CAUTIONED THAT THE LOCATION AND/ORELEVATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES AS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS IS BASED ON DESIGNDRAWINGS, RECORDS OF THE VARIOUS UTILITY COMPANIES, AND WHERE POSSIBLE,MEASUREMENTS TAKEN IN THE FIELD. CORE STATES, INC. DOES NOT GUARANTEETHAT LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE EXACT. THE CONTRACTOR MUST CONTACT THEAPPROPRIATE UTILITY COMPANIES AT LEAST 72 HOURS BEFORE ANY EXCAVATION TOREQUEST EXACT FIELD LOCATIONS OF UTILITIES.Call before you dig.below.Know what'sMcDonald's USA, LLC 4240 JURUPA STREET, SUITE 402ONTARIO, CA 91761PHONE (909) 467-8940TVINCENT@CORE-STATES.COMPRELIMINARY SITEPLANSFOR MCDONALDS ATLOS GATOS, CAMCD.3068610/13/2021KCZM15475 LOS GATOSBLVD,LOS GATOS, CA 95032(004-0582)0603060151" = 60'GRAPHIC SCALEEXHIBITEX-11" = 60' 3030-54 TOPO DN DN UP UP5'-0"·McDonald's USA, LLC4240 East Jurupa St., Suite 402Ontario, CA 91761Phone (909) 467-8907Core-eng.com McDonald's USA, LLC4240 East Jurupa St., Suite 402Ontario, CA 91761Phone (909) 467-8907Core-eng.com McDonald's USA, LLC4240 East Jurupa St., Suite 402Ontario, CA 91761Phone (909) 467-8907Core-eng.com LOS G A T O S R O A D YOUTHANKTHRU DRIV E THRU DRIV ETHRUDRIVENO PARKINGNO PARKINGDRIVETHRU3224754397871620'15'10'15' 23.67'12'9'23.35'R2'R10'R5'R5'9'8'9'9'9'8'9'18'5' 3.6'R3.5'3.9'5'20.23'99.8'68.41'156.91'61.13 'R5'5'18.25'9'23.33'12344BBBBCCCCDDDEEFFFFGGGGHHIJJKJJJKJKMLNNNNNNPOOOODB6'6'5'6'6'5'7'5'5'JJJJJAAQR20'1R3'R45'R3'60'QBB1A2345678910111213BCDEFGHIDOCUMENTS PREPARED BY CORESTATES, INC.,INCLUDING THIS DOCUMENT, ARE TO BE USEDONLY FOR THE SPECIFIC PROJECT AND SPECIFICUSE FOR WHICH THEY WERE INTENDED. ANYEXTENSION OF USE TO ANY OTHER PROJECTS,BY OWNER OR BY ANY OTHER PARTY, WITHOUTTHE EXPRESSED WRITTEN CONSENT OFCORESTATES, INC. IS DONE UNLAWFULLY ANDAT THE USERS OWN RISK. IF USED IN A WAYOTHER THAN THAT SPECIFICALLY INTENDED,USER WILL HOLD CORESTATES, INC. HARMLESSFROM ALL CLAIMS AND LOSSES.Drawing: P:\McDonalds\MRP\Los Gatos, CA (15475 Los Gatos Blvd) 004-0582 -MCD.30686\CIVIL\Drawings\Presentation\MCD-30686-P-SITE.dwg ;Layout1Plot Date/Time: Oct. 14, 21 - 18:23:48User: KCARTERSITE LOCATIONENGINEER SEALDOCUMENTREV DATE COMMENT BYCLIENTCHECKED BY:SHEET NO.JOB #:SCALE:DRAWN BY:DATE:SHEET TITLETHE CONTRACTOR IS SPECIFICALLY CAUTIONED THAT THE LOCATION AND/ORELEVATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES AS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS IS BASED ON DESIGNDRAWINGS, RECORDS OF THE VARIOUS UTILITY COMPANIES, AND WHERE POSSIBLE,MEASUREMENTS TAKEN IN THE FIELD. CORE STATES, INC. DOES NOT GUARANTEETHAT LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE EXACT. THE CONTRACTOR MUST CONTACT THEAPPROPRIATE UTILITY COMPANIES AT LEAST 72 HOURS BEFORE ANY EXCAVATION TOREQUEST EXACT FIELD LOCATIONS OF UTILITIES.Call before you dig.below.Know what'sDOCUMENTS PREPARED BY CORESTATES, INC.,INCLUDING THIS DOCUMENT, ARE TO BE USEDONLY FOR THE SPECIFIC PROJECT AND SPECIFICUSE FOR WHICH THEY WERE INTENDED. ANYEXTENSION OF USE TO ANY OTHER PROJECTS,BY OWNER OR BY ANY OTHER PARTY, WITHOUTTHE EXPRESSED WRITTEN CONSENT OFCORESTATES, INC. IS DONE UNLAWFULLY ANDAT THE USERS OWN RISK. IF USED IN A WAYOTHER THAN THAT SPECIFICALLY INTENDED,USER WILL HOLD CORESTATES, INC. HARMLESSFROM ALL CLAIMS AND LOSSES.CLIENTTHE CONTRACTOR IS SPECIFICALLY CAUTIONED THAT THE LOCATION AND/ORELEVATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES AS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS IS BASED ON DESIGNDRAWINGS, RECORDS OF THE VARIOUS UTILITY COMPANIES, AND WHERE POSSIBLE,MEASUREMENTS TAKEN IN THE FIELD. CORE STATES, INC. DOES NOT GUARANTEETHAT LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE EXACT. THE CONTRACTOR MUST CONTACT THEAPPROPRIATE UTILITY COMPANIES AT LEAST 72 HOURS BEFORE ANY EXCAVATION TOREQUEST EXACT FIELD LOCATIONS OF UTILITIES.Call before you dig.below.Know what'sMcDonald's USA, LLC 4240 JURUPA STREET, SUITE 402ONTARIO, CA 91761PHONE (909) 467-8940TVINCENT@CORE-STATES.COMPRELIMINARY SITEPLANSFOR MCDONALDS ATLOS GATOS, CAMCD.3068610/13/2021KCZM15475 LOS GATOSBLVD,LOS GATOS, CA 95032(004-0582)1" = 20'02010205GRAPHIC SCALEPRELIMINARYSITE PLANPSP-A1" = 20'SITE LEGENDEXISTING PROPERTY BOUNDARY LINEEXISTING ADJOINING PROPERTY LINEPROPOSED CURBPROPOSED DEPRESSED CURBPROPOSED SIDEWALKPROPOSED CONCRETEPROPOSED PARKING COUNTPROPOSED BUILDINGPROPOSED ASPHALTPROPOSED CURB AND GUTTEREXISTING UTILITY EASEMENTEXISTING EDGE OF PAVEMENTEXISTING WATER STRUCTUREEXISTING SANITARY STRUCTURESWVEXISTING CURB AND GUTTEREXISTING STORMWATER STRUCTURESSPILL GUTTERDSPPEXISTING ELECTRIC STRUCTUREGENERAL NOTES:APPLICANT/OWNER:MCDONALD'S CORPORATION2527 CAMINO RAMON ST. 300SAN RAMON, CA 945831) SITE ADDRESS:15475 LOS GATOS ROAD LOS GATOS, CA 95032SANTA CLARA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA2) A.P.N.424-19-0653) ZONING DATA:ZONED: CH - HIGHWAY COMMERCIAL29.60.420EXISTING USE: RESTAURANTPROPOSED USE: RESTAURANT(PERMITTED)REQUIREDEXISTINGPROPOSEDMIN. LOT AREA:N/A1.334 AC.1.334 AC N/A(58,125 S.F.)(58,125 S.F.)MIN. LOT FRONTAGE: N/A195.03'195.03'MIN. LOT WIDTH:N/A301.65'301.65'MIN. FRONT YARD: 15'99.80' (E) 99.80' (E)MIN. SIDE YARD:0'61.01' (S)61.01' (S) 61.13' (N)61.13' (N)MIN. REAR YARD:0'156.91' (W)156.91' (W)MAX. IMPERVIOUSSURFACE:N/A79.56%78.46%(46,244 S.F.)(46,607 S.F.)MAX. HEIGHT:35'16'-1"16'-1"4) PARKING REQUIREMENTS:29.10.1501 SPACE PER 235 SQUARE FEET OF NET PUBLIC AREA.4,267 S.F. X (1/235) = 19 SPACESREQUIRED = 19 SPACESEXISTING McDONALD'S AREA PARKING: 92 SPACES (INCLUDING 4 ACCESSIBLE SPACES)PROPOSED McDONALD'S AREA PARKING: 77 SPACES (INCLUDING 4 ACCESSIBLE SPACES)PARKING STALL DIMENSIONS:EXISTING: VARIESREQUIRED: 9'X18'PROPOSED: 9'X18'4) ALL EXISTING FEATURES ARE TO REMAIN UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.5) ALL PAVEMENT MARKINGS SHALL BE LONG LIFE EPOXY.6) PRIOR TO STARTING CONSTRUCTION, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE TO MAKE SURETHAT ALL REQUIRED PERMITS AND APPROVALS HAVE BEEN OBTAINED. NO CONSTRUCTION ORFABRICATION SHALL BEGIN UNTIL THE CONTRACTOR HAS RECEIVED AND THOROUGHLYREVIEWED ALL PLANS AND OTHER DOCUMENTS BY ALL OF THE PERMITTING AUTHORITIES.7) ALL WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THESE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONSAND THE REQUIREMENTS AND STANDARDS OF THE LOCAL GOVERNING AUTHORITY.8) ALL DIMENSIONS SHOWN ON THE PLANS SHALL BE FIELD VERIFIED BY THE CONTRACTOR PRIORTO CONSTRUCTION. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY ENGINEER IF ANY DISCREPANCIES EXISTPRIOR TO PROCEEDING WITH CONSTRUCTION FOR NECESSARY PLAN CHANGES. NO EXTRA COMPENSATION SHALL BE PAID TO THE CONTRACTOR FOR WORK HAVING TO BE REDONE DUE TODIMENSIONS OR GRADES SHOWN INCORRECTLY ON THESE PLANS IF SUCH NOTIFICATION HASNOT BEEN GIVEN.9) SOLID WASTE TO BE DISPOSED OF BY CONTRACTOR IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL LOCAL, STATEAND FEDERAL REGULATIONS.10) ALL EXCAVATED UNSUITABLE MATERIAL MUST BE TRANSPORTED TO AN APPROVED DISPOSALLOCATION.11) CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL SHORING REQUIRED DURING EXCAVATION AND SHALL BEPERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH CURRENT OSHA STANDARDS, AS WELL AS ADDITIONALPROVISIONS TO ASSURE STABILITY OF CONTIGUOUS STRUCTURES, AS FIELD CONDITIONSDICTATE.SIGN LEGEND:PROPOSED SPRINGBOARD CANOPY.PROPOSED DIGITAL PRE-BROWSE MENU BOARD.PROPOSED WELCOME POINT GATEWAY.PROPOSED OUTDOOR DIGITAL MENU BOARD (ODMB).*VERIFY SIGNAGE WITH SIGN ORDER REQUEST FORM.*VERIFY LOCATIONS WITH McDONALD'S REPRESENTATIVE.1234SITE KEY NOTES:A. PROPOSED LANDSCAPE AREA.B. PROPOSED CONCRETE CURB.C. PROPOSED ACCESSIBLE PARKING STRIPING. MUST BE LONG LIFE EPOXY.D. PROPOSED PARKING STRIPING (TYP.). MUST BE LONG LIFE EPOXY.E. PROPOSED CROSSWALK STRIPING.F. PROPOSED ACCESSIBLE CURB RAMP WITH 3' DEEP DETECTABLE WARNING.G. PROPOSED CONCRETE SIDEWALK.H. DETECTOR LOOP(S) TO BE INSTALLED / REPLACED AT EXISTING DRIVE THRU WINDOWS AS DIRECTED BY MCDONALD’SCONSTRUCTION MANAGER.I. PROPOSED GUARDRAIL.J. PROPOSED YELLOW DRIVE-THRU DIRECTION PAVEMENT MARKINGS.K. PROPOSED YELLOW PAINTED "DRIVE THRU" PAVEMENT MARKINGS.L. PROPOSED 6" WIDE YELLOW PAINTED STRIPE.M. PROPOSED YELLOW PAINTED "THANK YOU" PAVEMENT PARKING.N. PROPOSED DIRECTIONAL SITE ARROWS.O. PROPOSED ADA PARKING SIGN AND POST.P. PROPOSED WHEEL STOP.Q. PROPOSED LOT LIGHT. B 7 1 McDonald's USA, LLC4240 East Jurupa St., Suite 402Ontario, CA 91761Phone (909) 467-8907Core-eng.comMcDonald's USA, LLC4240 East Jurupa St., Suite 402Ontario, CA 91761Phone (909) 467-8907Core-eng.com XX XX McDonald's USA, LLC4240 East Jurupa St., Suite 402Ontario, CA 91761Phone (909) 467-8907Core-eng.com LOS G A T O S R O A D YOUTHANKTHRU DRIV E THRU DRIV ETHRUDRIVENO PARKINGNO PARKINGDRIVETHRUTREE NUMBERS 489& 491 ARE TO BEREMOVED. REPLACEWITH TWO OAKS ASSHOWN.TREE NUMBER 49012" OAK, TO REMAIN. VERIFY WITHARBORIST REPORT.1A2345678910111213BCDEFGHIDOCUMENTS PREPARED BY CORESTATES, INC.,INCLUDING THIS DOCUMENT, ARE TO BE USEDONLY FOR THE SPECIFIC PROJECT AND SPECIFICUSE FOR WHICH THEY WERE INTENDED. ANYEXTENSION OF USE TO ANY OTHER PROJECTS,BY OWNER OR BY ANY OTHER PARTY, WITHOUTTHE EXPRESSED WRITTEN CONSENT OFCORESTATES, INC. IS DONE UNLAWFULLY ANDAT THE USERS OWN RISK. IF USED IN A WAYOTHER THAN THAT SPECIFICALLY INTENDED,USER WILL HOLD CORESTATES, INC. HARMLESSFROM ALL CLAIMS AND LOSSES.SITE LOCATIONENGINEER SEALDOCUMENTREV DATE COMMENT BYCLIENTCHECKED BY:SHEET NO.JOB #:SCALE:DRAWN BY:DATE:SHEET TITLETHE CONTRACTOR IS SPECIFICALLY CAUTIONED THAT THE LOCATION AND/ORELEVATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES AS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS IS BASED ON DESIGNDRAWINGS, RECORDS OF THE VARIOUS UTILITY COMPANIES, AND WHERE POSSIBLE,MEASUREMENTS TAKEN IN THE FIELD. CORE STATES, INC. DOES NOT GUARANTEETHAT LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE EXACT. THE CONTRACTOR MUST CONTACT THEAPPROPRIATE UTILITY COMPANIES AT LEAST 72 HOURS BEFORE ANY EXCAVATION TOREQUEST EXACT FIELD LOCATIONS OF UTILITIES.Call before you dig.below.Know what'sDOCUMENTS PREPARED BY CORESTATES, INC.,INCLUDING THIS DOCUMENT, ARE TO BE USEDONLY FOR THE SPECIFIC PROJECT AND SPECIFICUSE FOR WHICH THEY WERE INTENDED. ANYEXTENSION OF USE TO ANY OTHER PROJECTS,BY OWNER OR BY ANY OTHER PARTY, WITHOUTTHE EXPRESSED WRITTEN CONSENT OFCORESTATES, INC. IS DONE UNLAWFULLY ANDAT THE USERS OWN RISK. IF USED IN A WAYOTHER THAN THAT SPECIFICALLY INTENDED,USER WILL HOLD CORESTATES, INC. HARMLESSFROM ALL CLAIMS AND LOSSES.CLIENTTHE CONTRACTOR IS SPECIFICALLY CAUTIONED THAT THE LOCATION AND/ORELEVATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES AS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS IS BASED ON DESIGNDRAWINGS, RECORDS OF THE VARIOUS UTILITY COMPANIES, AND WHERE POSSIBLE,MEASUREMENTS TAKEN IN THE FIELD. CORE STATES, INC. DOES NOT GUARANTEETHAT LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE EXACT. THE CONTRACTOR MUST CONTACT THEAPPROPRIATE UTILITY COMPANIES AT LEAST 72 HOURS BEFORE ANY EXCAVATION TOREQUEST EXACT FIELD LOCATIONS OF UTILITIES.Call before you dig.below.Know what'sMcDonald's USA, LLC 4240 JURUPA STREET, SUITE 402 ONTARIO, CA 91761 PHONE (909) 467-8940 TVINCENT@CORE-STATES.COMPRELIMINARY SITEPLANSFOR MCDONALDS ATLOS GATOS, CAMCD.3068610/13/2021KCZM15475 LOS GATOSBLVD,LOS GATOS, CA 95032(004-0582)1" = 20'02010205GRAPHIC SCALELANDSCAPE ARCHITECTTHOMAS H. KOCHDateRenewal DateSignature10-18-215-31-23L ICENSE D L ANDSCAPEARCHITECTSTATEOFCALI FOR NIA T H OMAS H .KOCHNo.3602L1.0PLANTING PLANPLANTING NOTESCONTRACTOR TO REVIEW PLANS, VERIFY SITE CONDITIONS AND PLANT QUANTITIES PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. CONFLICTS BETWEEN THESITE AND THESE PLANS OR WITHIN THESE PLANS SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE OWNERS AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVEPRIOR TO LANDSCAPE INSTALLATION. ANY DEVIATION(S) FROM THE PLANS OR SPECIFICATIONS TO HAVE WRITTEN APPROVAL.CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY LOCATIONS OF ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES AND SERVICES PRIOR TO ANY UNDERGROUND DIGGING.CONTRACTOR ASSUMES FULL RESPONSIBILITY FOR ALL DAMAGE FOR FAILURE TO DO SO.CONTRACTOR TO SUBMIT SOIL SAMPLES TO THE LABORATORY FOR ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATIONS.1. SOIL SAMPLING SHALL BE CONDUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH LABORATORY PROTOCOL, INCLUDING PROTOCOLS REGARDING ADEQUATE SAMPLING DEPTH FOR THE INTENDED PLANTS.2. SOILS ANALYSIS MAY INCLUDE: A. SOIL TEXTURE B. INFILTRATION RATE DETERMINED BY LABORATORY TEST OR SOIL INFILTRATION RATE TABLE. C. pH. D. TOTAL SOLUBLE SALTS. E. SODIUM. F. PERCENT ORGANIC MATTER. G. RECOMMENDATIONS.CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT THE SOILS ANALYSIS REPORT TO THE CITY AS PART OF THE CERTIFICATE OF COMPLETION.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT DOCUMENTATION TO THE CITY VERIFYING IMPLEMENTATION OF SOIL ANALYSIS REPORTRECOMMENDATIONS TO THE CITY WITH CERTIFICATE OF COMPLETION.SEE PLANTING DETAILS FOR ALL PLANTING AND STAKING / GUYING REQUIREMENTS. ALL SHRUB AND GROUND COVER TO BE INSTALLED 1"ABOVE BACKFILL GRADE. COMPACT BACKFILL TO REDUCE MAJOR SETTLING OF PLANT MATERIAL.FERTILIZER FOR ALL GROUND COVER AREAS SHALL BE AS SPECIFIED WITHIN THE SPECIFICATIONS.THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN ALL PLANT AREAS BY MEANS OF CONTINUOUS WATERING, PRUNING, RAISING TREE BALLSWHICH SETTLE BELOW GRADE, FERTILIZING, APPLICATION OF SPRAYS THAT MAY BE NECESSARY TO KEEP THE PLANTING'S FREE FROMINSECTS AND DISEASES, WEEDING, ROLLING, MOWING, RE-SEEDING, EDGING AND / OR OTHER OPERATIONS NECESSARY FOR PROPER CAREAND UPKEEP. THE ENTIRE PROJECT TO BE MAINTAINED FOR A PERIOD OF (30) DAYS, COMMENCING FROM THE TIME ALL ITEMS OF WORKHAVE BEEN COMPLETED TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT.CONTRACTOR SHALL MULCH ALL SHRUB AND GROUND COVER AREAS AFTER INSTALLATION OF PLANT MATERIAL WITH A MINIMUM 3" DEEPLAYER OF COMPOSTED AMENDMENT OR TOP DRESS MATERIAL.ALL FINISH GRADES IN SHRUB AREAS SHALL BE 3" BELOW PAVEMENT OR CURBS.ALL SPECIMEN TREES SHALL RECEIVE DEEP ROOT BARRIERS WHEN LOCATED WITHIN 5' OF HARDSCAPE. FICUS SPECIES SHALL RECEIVEDEEP ROOT BARRIERS IN ALL CASES. INSTALL DEEP ROOT BARRIERS PER MANUFACTURERS SPECIFICATIONS, OR AS NOTED.REFER TO SPECIFICATIONS FOR STANDARDS OF MATERIALS AND WORKMANSHIP.OWNER SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR REGULARLY SCHEDULED MAINTENANCE OF THE ENTIRE LANDSCAPE. WHICH WILL INCLUDE BUT NOTBE LIMITED TO; MAINTAIN AND OPERATE THE LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION SYSTEM ON THE PROPERTY CONSISTENT WITH THE MAWA.MAINTAIN THE IRRIGATION SYSTEM TO MEET OR EXCEED IRRIGATION EFFICIENCY NECESSARY TO MEET MAWA. REPLACE BROKEN ORMALFUNCTIONING IRRIGATION SYSTEM COMPONENTS OF THE SAME MATERIALS AND SPECIFICATIONS, THEIR EQUIVALENT OR BETTER.ENSURE THAT WHEN VEGETATION IS REPLACED, REPLACEMENT PLANTINGS ARE REPRESENTATIVE OF THE HYDROZONE IN WHICH THEPLANTS WERE REMOVED AND ARE TYPICAL OF THE WATER USE REQUIREMENTS OF THE PLANTS REMOVED, SO THAT THE REPLACEDVEGETATION DOES NOT RESULT IN MIXING HIGH WATER USE PLANTS WITH LOW WATER USE PLANTS IN THE SAME HYDROZONE. LOS G A T O S R O A D YOUTHANKTHRU DRIV E THRU DRIV ETHRUDRIVENO PARKINGNO PARKINGDRIVETHRUCC -C -C -C -SITE LIGHT,TYP.EXIST. TREE,TYP.C -CNO SYMBOLSHOWNNO SYMBOLSHOWN1A2345678910111213BCDEFGHIDOCUMENTS PREPARED BY CORESTATES, INC.,INCLUDING THIS DOCUMENT, ARE TO BE USEDONLY FOR THE SPECIFIC PROJECT AND SPECIFICUSE FOR WHICH THEY WERE INTENDED. ANYEXTENSION OF USE TO ANY OTHER PROJECTS,BY OWNER OR BY ANY OTHER PARTY, WITHOUTTHE EXPRESSED WRITTEN CONSENT OFCORESTATES, INC. IS DONE UNLAWFULLY ANDAT THE USERS OWN RISK. IF USED IN A WAYOTHER THAN THAT SPECIFICALLY INTENDED,USER WILL HOLD CORESTATES, INC. HARMLESSFROM ALL CLAIMS AND LOSSES.SITE LOCATIONENGINEER SEALDOCUMENTREV DATE COMMENT BYCLIENTCHECKED BY:SHEET NO.JOB #:SCALE:DRAWN BY:DATE:SHEET TITLETHE CONTRACTOR IS SPECIFICALLY CAUTIONED THAT THE LOCATION AND/ORELEVATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES AS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS IS BASED ON DESIGNDRAWINGS, RECORDS OF THE VARIOUS UTILITY COMPANIES, AND WHERE POSSIBLE,MEASUREMENTS TAKEN IN THE FIELD. CORE STATES, INC. DOES NOT GUARANTEETHAT LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE EXACT. THE CONTRACTOR MUST CONTACT THEAPPROPRIATE UTILITY COMPANIES AT LEAST 72 HOURS BEFORE ANY EXCAVATION TOREQUEST EXACT FIELD LOCATIONS OF UTILITIES.Call before you dig.below.Know what'sDOCUMENTS PREPARED BY CORESTATES, INC.,INCLUDING THIS DOCUMENT, ARE TO BE USEDONLY FOR THE SPECIFIC PROJECT AND SPECIFICUSE FOR WHICH THEY WERE INTENDED. ANYEXTENSION OF USE TO ANY OTHER PROJECTS,BY OWNER OR BY ANY OTHER PARTY, WITHOUTTHE EXPRESSED WRITTEN CONSENT OFCORESTATES, INC. IS DONE UNLAWFULLY ANDAT THE USERS OWN RISK. IF USED IN A WAYOTHER THAN THAT SPECIFICALLY INTENDED,USER WILL HOLD CORESTATES, INC. HARMLESSFROM ALL CLAIMS AND LOSSES.CLIENTTHE CONTRACTOR IS SPECIFICALLY CAUTIONED THAT THE LOCATION AND/ORELEVATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES AS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS IS BASED ON DESIGNDRAWINGS, RECORDS OF THE VARIOUS UTILITY COMPANIES, AND WHERE POSSIBLE,MEASUREMENTS TAKEN IN THE FIELD. CORE STATES, INC. DOES NOT GUARANTEETHAT LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE EXACT. THE CONTRACTOR MUST CONTACT THEAPPROPRIATE UTILITY COMPANIES AT LEAST 72 HOURS BEFORE ANY EXCAVATION TOREQUEST EXACT FIELD LOCATIONS OF UTILITIES.Call before you dig.below.Know what'sMcDonald's USA, LLC 4240 JURUPA STREET, SUITE 402 ONTARIO, CA 91761 PHONE (909) 467-8940 TVINCENT@CORE-STATES.COMPRELIMINARY SITEPLANSFOR MCDONALDS ATLOS GATOS, CAMCD.3068610/13/2021KCZM15475 LOS GATOSBLVD,LOS GATOS, CA 95032(004-0582)1" = 20'02010205GRAPHIC SCALELANDSCAPE ARCHITECTTHOMAS H. KOCHDateRenewal DateSignature10-18-215-31-23L ICENSE D L ANDSCAPEARCHITECTSTATEOFCALI FOR NIA T H OMAS H .KOCHNo.3602L2.0IRRIGATION PLANIRRIGATION NOTESALL MAIN LINE PIPING AND CONTROL WIRES UNDER PAVING SHALL BE INSTALLED IN SEPARATE SLEEVES. MAIN LINE SLEEVESSHALL BE A MINIMUM OF TWICE THE DIAMETER OF THE PIPE TO BE SLEEVED. CONTROL WIRE SLEEVES SHALL BE OF SUFFICIENTSIZE FOR THE REQUIRED NUMBER OF WIRES UNDER PAVING.ALL PIPING UNDER PAVING SHALL BE PVC SCH 40 OR BETTER. INSTALL PRIOR TO PAVING.PIPE SIZES SHALL CONFORM TO THOSE SHOWN ON THE DRAWING. NO SUBSTITUTION OF SMALLER SIZES WILL BE PERMITTED.LARGER SIZES MAY BE APPROVED. ALL DAMAGED AND REJECTED PIPE SHALL BE REMOVED FROM THE SITE AT THE TIME OF SAIDREJECTION.PROVIDE A MINIMUM 24" COVER OVER ALL MAIN LINE PIPING AND 18" COVER OVER ALL LATERAL LINE PIPING.ALL SPRINKLER OR EMITTER HEADS SHALL BE PERPENDICULAR TO FINISH GRADE UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED.FINAL LOCATION OF THE AUTOMATIC CONTROLLER SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE OWNERS AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE.110V AC ELECTRICAL POWER SOURCE AT THE CONTROLLER LOCATION SHALL BE PROVIDED BY OTHERS. THE IRRIGATIONCONTRACTOR SHALL MAKE THE FINAL CONNECTION FROM THE ELECTRICAL SOURCE TO THE CONTROLLER.ALL WIRES FROM CONTROLLER(S) TO ELECTRICAL VALVES SHALL BE COPPER #14 UF DIRECT BURIAL CABLE. USE BLACK FORPILOT, WHITE FOR COMMON. INSTALL IN TRENCH WITH MAIN LINE WHENEVER POSSIBLE. PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF 24" COVER.THIS IRRIGATION DRAWING IS DIAGRAMMATIC. ALL PIPING, VALVES, ETC. SHOWN WITHIN PAVED AREAS IS FOR GRAPHICCLARIFICATION ONLY AND SHALL BE INSTALLED IN THE THE NEAREST PLANTING AREA WHENEVER POSSIBLE. THE CONTRACTORSHALL LOCATE ALL VALVES IN SHRUB AREAS.CONTRACTOR SHALL FLUSH ALL LINES AND ADJUST ALL HEADS FOR BEST PERFORMANCE AND TO PREVENT OVER SPRAY ONTO WALKS,DRIVES AND BUILDINGS AS MUCH AS POSSIBLE. THIS SHALL INCLUDE THE SELECTION OF THE BEST DEGREE OF ARC TO FIT THE EXISTINGSITE CONDITIONS.IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR TO FAMILIARIZE HIMSELF WITH ALL GRADE DIFFERENCES, LOCATIONS OFWALLS, STRUCTURES AND UTILITIES. THE IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE ALL ITEMS DAMAGED BY HIS WORK. HESHALL COORDINATE HIS WORK WITH OTHER CONTRACTORS FOR THE LOCATION AND INSTALLATION OF PIPE SLEEVES AND LATERALSTHROUGH WALLS, UNDER ROADWAYS, PAVING, ETC..DO NOT WILLFULLY INSTALL THE IRRIGATION SYSTEM AS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS WHEN IT IS OBVIOUS IN THE FIELD THAT UNKNOWNOBSTRUCTIONS, GRADE DIFFERENCES, OR DIFFERENCES IN THE AREA DIMENSIONS EXIST THAT MIGHT NOT HAVE BEEN CONSIDERED INTHE ENGINEERING. SUCH OBSTRUCTIONS OR DIFFERENCES SHOULD BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE OWNERS AUTHORIZEDREPRESENTATIVE. IN THE EVENT THIS NOTIFICATION IS NOT PERFORMED, THE IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR SHALL ASSUME FULLRESPONSIBILITY FOR ANY REVISIONS NECESSARY.ALL EQUIPMENT NOT OTHERWISE DETAILED OR SPECIFIED SHALL BE INSTALLED AS PER THE MANUFACTURER SPECIFICATIONS.ADV (ANTI-DRAIN VALVES) UNITS AS SHOWN IN THE DETAILS ARE FOR TYPICAL INSTALLATIONS ONLY AND MAY NOT BE REQUIRED ON ALLHEADS. PRIOR TO INSTALLATION THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY THE ON SITE GRADES. IF THERE IS A DIFFERENCE IN ELEVATION OFOVER 24" OR MORE BETWEEN THE HIGHEST HEAD AND THE LOWEST HEAD ON A CIRCUIT, THE ADV'S SHALL BE INSTALLED AS PER THEDETAIL.SYSTEM DESIGN IS BASED ON PRESSURE AND FLOW RATES AT POINTS OF CONNECTION.REFER TO SPECIFICATIONS FOR STANDARDS OF MATERIAL AND WORKMANSHIP.CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR RODENT CONTROL OF ANY DRIP SYSTEM DURING INSTALLATION AND MAINTENANCE PERIOD. 1A2345678910111213BCDEFGHIDOCUMENTS PREPARED BY CORESTATES, INC.,INCLUDING THIS DOCUMENT, ARE TO BE USEDONLY FOR THE SPECIFIC PROJECT AND SPECIFICUSE FOR WHICH THEY WERE INTENDED. ANYEXTENSION OF USE TO ANY OTHER PROJECTS,BY OWNER OR BY ANY OTHER PARTY, WITHOUTTHE EXPRESSED WRITTEN CONSENT OFCORESTATES, INC. IS DONE UNLAWFULLY ANDAT THE USERS OWN RISK. IF USED IN A WAYOTHER THAN THAT SPECIFICALLY INTENDED,USER WILL HOLD CORESTATES, INC. HARMLESSFROM ALL CLAIMS AND LOSSES.SITE LOCATIONENGINEER SEALDOCUMENTREV DATE COMMENT BYCLIENTCHECKED BY:SHEET NO.JOB #:SCALE:DRAWN BY:DATE:SHEET TITLETHE CONTRACTOR IS SPECIFICALLY CAUTIONED THAT THE LOCATION AND/ORELEVATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES AS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS IS BASED ON DESIGNDRAWINGS, RECORDS OF THE VARIOUS UTILITY COMPANIES, AND WHERE POSSIBLE,MEASUREMENTS TAKEN IN THE FIELD. CORE STATES, INC. DOES NOT GUARANTEETHAT LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE EXACT. THE CONTRACTOR MUST CONTACT THEAPPROPRIATE UTILITY COMPANIES AT LEAST 72 HOURS BEFORE ANY EXCAVATION TOREQUEST EXACT FIELD LOCATIONS OF UTILITIES.Call before you dig.below.Know what'sDOCUMENTS PREPARED BY CORESTATES, INC.,INCLUDING THIS DOCUMENT, ARE TO BE USEDONLY FOR THE SPECIFIC PROJECT AND SPECIFICUSE FOR WHICH THEY WERE INTENDED. ANYEXTENSION OF USE TO ANY OTHER PROJECTS,BY OWNER OR BY ANY OTHER PARTY, WITHOUTTHE EXPRESSED WRITTEN CONSENT OFCORESTATES, INC. IS DONE UNLAWFULLY ANDAT THE USERS OWN RISK. IF USED IN A WAYOTHER THAN THAT SPECIFICALLY INTENDED,USER WILL HOLD CORESTATES, INC. HARMLESSFROM ALL CLAIMS AND LOSSES.CLIENTTHE CONTRACTOR IS SPECIFICALLY CAUTIONED THAT THE LOCATION AND/ORELEVATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES AS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS IS BASED ON DESIGNDRAWINGS, RECORDS OF THE VARIOUS UTILITY COMPANIES, AND WHERE POSSIBLE,MEASUREMENTS TAKEN IN THE FIELD. CORE STATES, INC. DOES NOT GUARANTEETHAT LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE EXACT. THE CONTRACTOR MUST CONTACT THEAPPROPRIATE UTILITY COMPANIES AT LEAST 72 HOURS BEFORE ANY EXCAVATION TOREQUEST EXACT FIELD LOCATIONS OF UTILITIES.Call before you dig.below.Know what'sMcDonald's USA, LLC 4240 JURUPA STREET, SUITE 402 ONTARIO, CA 91761 PHONE (909) 467-8940 TVINCENT@CORE-STATES.COMPRELIMINARY SITEPLANSFOR MCDONALDS ATLOS GATOS, CAMCD.3068610/13/2021KCZM15475 LOS GATOSBLVD,LOS GATOS, CA 95032(004-0582)DateRenewal DateSignature10-18-215-31-23L ICENSE D L ANDSCAPEARCHITECTSTATEOFCALI FOR NIA T H OMAS H .KOCHNo.3602L3.0DETAILSLANDSCAPE ARCHITECTTHOMAS H. KOCH3-INCH MINIMUM DEPTH OF 3/4-INCH WASHED GRAVELPVC SCH 40 STREET ELLBRICK (1 OF 2) (LENGTH AS REQUIRED)PVC SCH 40 STREET ELLPVC SCH 80 NIPPLEQUICK-COUPLING VALVEVALVE BOX WITH COVER:PVC SCH 80 NIPPLE (LENGTH AS REQUIRED) 6-INCH SIZE.FINISH GRADE/TOP OF MULCHGALV. STEEL STAKE W/PVC SCH 40 TEE OR ELLPVC MAINLINE PIPECLAMPS OR EQUIVALENTSTAINLESS STEEL GEARPVC SCH 40 ELLSUPPORT SYSTEM1. FURNISH FITTINGS AND PIPING NOMINALLY SIZED IDENTICAL TO FG 6-INCH SIZEGATE VALVE ORPRESSURE REGULATORVALVE BOX WITH:BRICK (1 OF 2) 3/4-INCH WASHED GRAVEL3-INCH MINIMUM DEPTH OFPVC SCH 40 MALE ADAPTERMAIN LINEWIRING INCONDUITpercodeWIRE W/O CONDUITOR GREATER. UNTIE OF DIRECTION OF 30°HAVE BEEN MADE.AFTER ALL CONNECTIONSALL WIRING AT CHANGESTIE A 24-INCH LOOP INTRENCH AS SHOWN.PLASTIC PIPING TO ALL SOLVENT WELDBE SNAKED IN 10-FOOT INTERVALS.TAPE AND BUNDLE ATAND BESIDE MAINLINE.RUN WIRING BENEATHMAINLINEAND WIRING INMAINLINE, LATERAL,THE SAME TRENCH18"12"PIPEPLAN VIEW12"LATERAL18"PIPESECTION VIEW NOMINAL QUICK COUPLING VALVE INLET SIZE.NOTE:PIPE FROM P.O.C.3. ALL PIPE & FITTINGS TO BE "SCHEDULE K HARD COPPER". DEPARTMENT. VERIFY LOCAL REQUIREMENTS PRIOR TO INSTALLATION.1. INSTALL BACKFLOW PREVENTER AS REQUIRED BY LOCAL CODES AND HEALTH 2. INSTALL IN SHRUB AREA ONLYNOTE: NOTE: 12" MIN.PVC MALE ADAPTERFEMALE ADAPTERFINISH GRADEIRRIGATION MAINLINE PIPE (TYPICAL)PIPE BACKFLOW PREVENTERREDUCED PRESSURE"SCHEDULE K HARD COPPER"MINIMUM PIPE AND SLEEVE COVERAGE SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS:A. PRESSURE LINES:LESS THAN 2" IN DIAMETER - 18" COVER2" TO 5 12" IN DIAMETER - 24" COVER6" OR GREATER IN DIAMETER - 36" COVERB. LATERAL LINES: 12" COVERC. SLEEVES UNDER ROADS:6" OR LESS IN DIAMETER - 36" COVERGREATER THAN 6" IN DIAMETER - 48" COVERSCHEDULE 80 PVCD. SLEEVES UNDER PAVING (NON-ROADS): SAME AS ABOVESCHEDULE 40 PVC1. INSTALLATION TO BE COMPLETED IN ACCORDANCE WITH MANUFACTURERS SPECIFICATIONS.2. DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS.NOTES:31265478412111091514131217161. FINISH GRADE.2. CONTROL WIRES WITH 36" SERVICE COILAND WATER PROOF WIRE CONNECTIONS,DBY OR EQUAL.3. RECTANGULAR PLASTIC VALVE BOX. HEAT BRAND STATION NUMBER ON LID IN 2" HIGH CHARACTERS.4. PVC MAINLINE PER SPECIFICATIONS(LENGTH AS REQUIRED).5. SCH 40 PVC ELL (SxS).6. NATIVE SOIL PER SPECIFICATIONS.7. CONTROL WIRES TO CONTROLLER.8. PVC MAINLINE FITTING.9. TORO 700 INLINE VALVE .10. TORO 150 MESH Y-FILTER (*).11. TORO 25 PSI LOW FLOW PRESSUREREGULATOR (*).12. SCH 40 PVC MALE ADAPTER.13. SCH 40 PVC BALL VALVE (*).14. SCH 80 PVC CLOSE NIPPLE (*).15. PEA GRAVEL SUMP, MINIMUM 6" DEEP.16 BRICK SUPPORTS (4 COMMON BRICKSREQUIRED).17. LATERAL LINE TO DRIP SYSTEM.18. RECYCLED WATER ID TAG, IF REQUIRED.SECTION/ELEVATIONLEGENDNOT TO SCALE18896745321987654321FINISH GRADE.DEPTH OF TUBING PERSPECIFICATIONS (SEE TOROPUBLICATION #ALT111).DEPTH OF PVC SUPPLYMANIFOLD PERSPECIFICATIONS.TORO LOC-EZE TEE (FTT16).TORO DL2000 DRIPLINELATERAL (RGP-XXX-XX).TORO BLUE STRIPE POLYTUBING (EHD1645-XXX),LENGTH AS NECESSARY.TORO LOC-EZE X 1/2" MTPADAPTER (FAM16).PVC TEE (SxSxT) WITH 1/2"FPT OUTLET.PVC SUPPLY MANIFOLDFROM DRIP ZONE KIT.ISOMETRICNOT TO SCALELEGEND:NOTES:1. INSTALLATION TO BE COMPLETED IN ACCORDANCE WITH MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS.2. DO NOT SCALE DRAWING.3. THIS DRAWING IS INTENDED FOR USE BY ARCHITECTS, ENGINEERS, CONTRACTORS, CONSULTANTS AND DESIGNPROFESSIONALS FOR PLANNING PURPOSES ONLY. THIS DRAWING MAY NOT BE USED FOR CONSTRUCTION.4. ALL INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN WAS CURRENT AT THE TIME OF DEVELOPMENT BUT MUST BE REVIEWED ANDAPPROVED BY THE PRODUCT MANUFACTURER TO BE CONSIDERED ACCURATE.5. CONTRACTOR'S NOTE: FOR PRODUCT AND COMPANY INFORMATION VISIT www.CADdetails.com/info AND ENTERREFERENCE NUMBER 065-165j.123456789NOT TO SCALEFINISH GRADE.TORO DL2000 DRIPLINELATERAL (RGP-XXX-XX).TORO LOC-EZE TEE (FTT16).TORO BLUE STRIPE POLYTUBING (EHD1645-XXX).TORO LOC-EZE X 1/2" MPTADAPTER (FAM16).PVC TEE (SxSxT) WITH 1/2"FPT OUTLET.NATIVE SOIL BACKFILL PERSPECIFICATIONS.DEPTH OF TUBING PERSPECIFICATIONS (SEE TOROPUBLICATION #ALT111).DEPTH OF PVC SUPPLY LINEPER SPECIFICATIONS.765432198SECTION/ELEVATIONLEGEND:NOTES:1. INSTALLATION TO BE COMPLETED IN ACCORDANCE WITH MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS.2. DO NOT SCALE DRAWING.3. THIS DRAWING IS INTENDED FOR USE BY ARCHITECTS, ENGINEERS, CONTRACTORS, CONSULTANTS AND DESIGNPROFESSIONALS FOR PLANNING PURPOSES ONLY. THIS DRAWING MAY NOT BE USED FOR CONSTRUCTION.4. ALL INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN WAS CURRENT AT THE TIME OF DEVELOPMENT BUT MUST BE REVIEWED ANDAPPROVED BY THE PRODUCT MANUFACTURER TO BE CONSIDERED ACCURATE.5. CONTRACTOR'S NOTE: FOR PRODUCT AND COMPANY INFORMATION VISIT www.CADdetails.com/info AND ENTERREFERENCE NUMBER 065-188e.AVFVFV43217658910111212TORO DL2000 AUTOMATIC FLUSHVALVE (FCH-H-FIPT) PLUMBED TOFLUSH MANIFOLD AT LOW POINT.PVC FLUSH MANIFOLD.TORO DL2000 MANIFOLD-TO-ELBOWCONNECTION (TYP).PVC LATERAL LINE FROM DRIP ZONEKIT.PVC SUPPLY MANIFOLD.TORO DL2000 MANIFOLD-TO-TEECONNECTION.TORO DL2000 DRIPLINE LATERAL(RGP-XXX-XX).AIR/VACUUM RELIEF LATERAL, TOROBLUE STRIPE POLY TUBING(EHD1645-XXX) CENTERED ON MOUNDOR BERM.TORO DL2000 AIR/VACUUM RELIEFVALVE (YD-500-34) PLUMBED TO TOROBLUE STRIPE POLY TUBING(EHD1645-XXX) AT EACH HIGH POINT.PERIMETER LATERALS 2" TO 4" FROMEDGE.AREA PERIMETER.TORO DL2000 OPERATION INDICATOR(DL-MP9), OPTIONAL.765432198101112NOT TO SCALEPLANLEGEND:NOTES:1. THE TOTAL LENGTH OF ALL INTERCONNECTED DRIP LINE SHALL NOT EXCEED THE MAXIMUM RUN LENGTH. SEE TORO SUBSURFACE IRRIGATION DESIGN GUIDE (FORM #ALT111).2. INSTALLATION TO BE COMPLETED IN ACCORDANCE WITH MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS.3. DO NOT SCALE DRAWING.4. THIS DRAWING IS INTENDED FOR USE BY ARCHITECTS, ENGINEERS, CONTRACTORS, CONSULTANTS AND DESIGNPROFESSIONALS FOR PLANNING PURPOSES ONLY. THIS DRAWING MAY NOT BE USED FOR CONSTRUCTION.5. ALL INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN WAS CURRENT AT THE TIME OF DEVELOPMENT BUT MUST BE REVIEWED ANDAPPROVED BY THE PRODUCT MANUFACTURER TO BE CONSIDERED ACCURATE.6. CONTRACTOR'S NOTE: FOR PRODUCT AND COMPANY INFORMATION VISIT www.CADdetails.com/info AND ENTERREFERENCE NUMBER 065-188g.AVFV1110891234567PVC LATERAL LINE FROM DRIPZONE KIT.PVC SUPPLY MANIFOLD.TORO DL2000MANIFOLD-TO-ELBOWCONNECTION (TYP).TORO DL2000 DRIPLINE LATERAL(RGP-XXX-XX).TORO DL2000 AIR/VACUUM RELIEFVALVE (YD-500-34) PLUMBED TOTORO BLUE STRIPE POLY TUBING(EHD1645-XXX) AT EACH HIGHPOINT.AIR/VACUUM RELIEF LATERAL,TORO BLUE STRIPE POLY TUBING(EHD1645-XXX) CENTERED ONMOUND OR BERM.PVC FLUSH MANIFOLD.PERIMETER LATERALS 2" TO 4"FROM EDGE.AREA PERIMETER.TORO DL2000 OPERATIONINDICATOR (DL-MP9), OPTIONAL.TORO DL2000 AUTOMATIC FLUSHVALVE (FCH-H-FIPT) PLUMBED TOFLUSH MANIFOLD AT LOW POINT.PLANNOT TO SCALE1098567234111LEGEND:NOTES:1. THE TOTAL LENGTH OF ALL INTERCONNECTED DRIP LINE SHALL NOT EXCEED THE MAXIMUM RUN LENGTH. SEE TORO SUBSURFACE IRRIGATION DESIGN GUIDE (FORM #ALT111).2. INSTALLATION TO BE COMPLETED IN ACCORDANCE WITH MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS.3. DO NOT SCALE DRAWING.4. THIS DRAWING IS INTENDED FOR USE BY ARCHITECTS, ENGINEERS, CONTRACTORS, CONSULTANTS AND DESIGNPROFESSIONALS FOR PLANNING PURPOSES ONLY. THIS DRAWING MAY NOT BE USED FOR CONSTRUCTION.5. ALL INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN WAS CURRENT AT THE TIME OF DEVELOPMENT BUT MUST BE REVIEWED ANDAPPROVED BY THE PRODUCT MANUFACTURER TO BE CONSIDERED ACCURATE.6. CONTRACTOR'S NOTE: FOR PRODUCT AND COMPANY INFORMATION VISIT www.CADdetails.com/info AND ENTERREFERENCE NUMBER 065-188h.12345678910119812345671" ABOVE FINISH GRADE.FINISH GRADE.6" ROUND PLASTIC VALVEBOX. HEAT BRAND "AR" ONLID IN 1" HIGH CHARACTERS.TORO DL2000 AIR/VACUUMRELIEF VALVE (YD-500-34).TORO LOC-EZE X 1/2" FPTTEE (FTF16).TORO DL2000 TUBING(RGP-XX-XXX) OR TORO BLUESTRIPE POLY TUBING(EHD1645-XXX) AIR-RELIEFLATERAL.PEA GRAVEL SUMP (6" DEEP).BRICK SUPPORTS (2COMMON BRICKS REQUIRED).NATIVE SOIL PERSPECIFICATIONS.NOT TO SCALESECTION/ELEVATIONLEGEND:NOTES:1. USE ONE AIR/RELIEF VALVE FOR EVERY 7 GPM PER ZONE. LOCATE AT HIGH POINTS. REFER TO TORO PUBLICATION #ALT111 FOR SPECIFICATIONS.2. INSTALLATION TO BE COMPLETED IN ACCORDANCE WITH MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS.3. DO NOT SCALE DRAWING.4. THIS DRAWING IS INTENDED FOR USE BY ARCHITECTS, ENGINEERS, CONTRACTORS, CONSULTANTS AND DESIGNPROFESSIONALS FOR PLANNING PURPOSES ONLY. THIS DRAWING MAY NOT BE USED FOR CONSTRUCTION.5. ALL INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN WAS CURRENT AT THE TIME OF DEVELOPMENT BUT MUST BE REVIEWED ANDAPPROVED BY THE PRODUCT MANUFACTURER TO BE CONSIDERED ACCURATE.6. CONTRACTOR'S NOTE: FOR PRODUCT AND COMPANY INFORMATION VISIT www.CADdetails.com/info AND ENTERREFERENCE NUMBER 065-188q.101" ABOVE FINISH GRADE.NATIVE SOIL PERSPECIFICATIONS.FINISH GRADE.TORO DL2000 FLUSH VALVE(FCH-H-FIPT).6" ROUND PLASTIC VALVEBOX . HEAT BRAND "FV" ONLID IN 1" HIGH CHARACTERS.3/4" SCH 80 PVC NIPPLE(LENGTH AS REQUIRED).BRICK SUPPORTS (2COMMON BRICKS REQUIRED).PEA GRAVEL SUMP (6" x 18").PVC ELL (SxT) WITH 3/4"THREADED OUTLET.PVC PIPING.765432189NOT TO SCALESECTION/ELEVATION10123456789LEGEND:NOTES:1. USE ONE FLUSH VALVE FOR EVERY 7 GPM PER ZONE. LOCATE AT LOW POINTS. FLUSH RATE IS 0.8 GPM. FLUSH PRESSURE IS 2 PSI. REFER TO TORO PUBLICATION #ALT111 FOR SPECIFICATIONS.2. INSTALLATION TO BE COMPLETED IN ACCORDANCE WITH MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS.3. DO NOT SCALE DRAWING.4. THIS DRAWING IS INTENDED FOR USE BY ARCHITECTS, ENGINEERS, CONTRACTORS, CONSULTANTS AND DESIGNPROFESSIONALS FOR PLANNING PURPOSES ONLY. THIS DRAWING MAY NOT BE USED FOR CONSTRUCTION.5. ALL INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN WAS CURRENT AT THE TIME OF DEVELOPMENT BUT MUST BE REVIEWED ANDAPPROVED BY THE PRODUCT MANUFACTURER TO BE CONSIDERED ACCURATE.6. CONTRACTOR'S NOTE: FOR PRODUCT AND COMPANY INFORMATION VISIT www.CADdetails.com/info AND ENTERREFERENCE NUMBER 065-188x.FINISH GRADE.TORO DL2000 INLINE CHECKVALVE (JV0500-S2).TORO DL2000 COMPRESSIONADAPTER (CA-710).TORO DL2000 DRIPLINE(RGP-XXX-XX).DEPTH OF TUBING PERSPECIFICATIONS (SEE TOROPUBLICATION #ALT111).5432112345NOT TO SCALESECTION/ELEVATIONNOTES:1. USE ONE FLUSH VALVE FOR EVERY 7 GPM PER ZONE. LOCATE AT LOW POINTS. FLUSH RATE IS 0.8 GPM. FLUSH PRESSURE IS 2 PSI. REFER TO TORO PUBLICATION #ALT111 FOR SPECIFICATIONS.2. INSTALLATION TO BE COMPLETED IN ACCORDANCE WITH MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS.3. DO NOT SCALE DRAWING.4. THIS DRAWING IS INTENDED FOR USE BY ARCHITECTS, ENGINEERS, CONTRACTORS, CONSULTANTS AND DESIGNPROFESSIONALS FOR PLANNING PURPOSES ONLY. THIS DRAWING MAY NOT BE USED FOR CONSTRUCTION.5. ALL INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN WAS CURRENT AT THE TIME OF DEVELOPMENT BUT MUST BE REVIEWED ANDAPPROVED BY THE PRODUCT MANUFACTURER TO BE CONSIDERED ACCURATE.6. CONTRACTOR'S NOTE: FOR PRODUCT AND COMPANY INFORMATION VISIT www.CADdetails.com/info AND ENTERREFERENCE NUMBER 065-188z.LEGEND:TMC-424 SERIES CONTROLLERFVAV10981234567PVC LATERAL LINE FROMDRIP ZONE KIT.PVC SUPPLY LINE.TORO DL2000MANIFOLD-TO-ELBOWCONNECTION (TYP).TORO DL2000 AIR/VACUUMRELIEF VALVE (YD-500-34)PLUMBED TO PVC SUPPLYLINE AT HIGH POINT.TORO DL2000 AUTOMATICFLUSH VALVE (FCH-H-FIPT)PLUMBED TO TUBING AT ENDOF EACH LINE.TORO DL2000 OPERATIONINDICATOR (DL-MP9),OPTIONAL.TORO DL2000 DRIPLINELATERAL (RGP-XXX-XX).TREE ROOTBALL.TORO DL2000 TEE (FTT16).ESTIMATED DRIP LINE OFMATURE TREE.PVC SUPPLY LINE TO OTHERTREES.111176543218910NOT TO SCALEPLANLEGEND:NOTES:1. THE TOTAL LENGTH OF ALL INTERCONNECTED DRIP LINESHALL NOT EXCEED THE MAXIMUM RUN LENGTH. SEE TORO SUBSURFACE IRRIGATION DESIGN GUIDE(FORM #ALT111).2. INSTALLATION TO BE COMPLETED IN ACCORDANCE WITHMANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS.3. DO NOT SCALE DRAWING.4. THIS DRAWING IS INTENDED FOR USE BY ARCHITECTS,ENGINEERS, CONTRACTORS, CONSULTANTS AND DESIGNPROFESSIONALS FOR PLANNING PURPOSES ONLY. THISDRAWING MAY NOT BE USED FOR CONSTRUCTION.5. ALL INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN WAS CURRENT ATTHE TIME OF DEVELOPMENT BUT MUST BE REVIEWEDAND APPROVED BY THE PRODUCT MANUFACTURER TOBE CONSIDERED ACCURATE.6. CONTRACTOR'S NOTE: FOR PRODUCT AND COMPANYINFORMATION VISIT www.CADdetails.com/info AND ENTERREFERENCE NUMBER 065-188o.TORO TSM-4F OR TSM-8F FLOW MODULE.MODEL DISPLAYED: TSM-8FFLOW SENSOR321TORO TMC-424 CONTROLLER. MODELDISPLAYED: TMC-424-ID. FLOW SENSORCONNECTION IS SAME FOR TMC-424-OD.FLOW MODULE MAY BE INSTALLED IN ANYMODULE SLOT (I, II, OR III). UP TO THREESEPARATE FLOW MODULES CONNECTEDTO THREE SEPARATE FLOW SENSORS MAYBE INSTALLED.RED WIRE TO+ ON FLOWMODULEBLACK WIRE TO- ON FLOWMODULERED WIRE TO+ ON FLOWMODULEBLACK WIRE TO- ON FLOWMODULE123SECTION/ELEVATIONLEGEND:NOTES:1. SEE ADDITIONAL DETAIL DRAWINGS FOR MOUNTING AND INSTALLATION OF TMC-424 CONTROLLER AND FLOW SENSOR.2. SEE PLANS, LEGEND AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR ADDITIONAL INSTALLATION NOTES.3. INSTALLATION TO BE COMPLETED IN ACCORDANCE WITH MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS.4. DO NOT SCALE DRAWING.5. THIS DRAWING IS INTENDED FOR USE BY ARCHITECTS, ENGINEERS, CONTRACTORS, CONSULTANTS AND DESIGN PROFESSIONALSFOR PLANNING PURPOSES ONLY. THIS DRAWING MAY NOT BE USED FOR CONSTRUCTION.6. ALL INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN WAS CURRENT AT THE TIME OF DEVELOPMENT BUT MUST BE REVIEWED AND APPROVED BYTHE PRODUCT MANUFACTURER TO BE CONSIDERED ACCURATE.7. CONTRACTOR'S NOTE: FOR PRODUCT AND COMPANY INFORMATION VISIT www.CADdetails.com/info AND ENTERREFERENCE NUMBER2. INSTALL MINIMUM 12" FROM HARDSCAPE. NOTE: CONTROLLER SHALL BE GROUNDED PER LOCAL CODES AND HAVE AN ON/OFF SWITCH OR BE ON A DEDICATED BREAKER.WIRELESS (SURFACE MOUNT) 3. CONTRACTORS NOTE: FOR PRODUCT AND COMPANY INFORMATION VISIT www.CADdetails.com/info1. INSTALLATION TO BE COMPLETED IN ACCORDANCE WITH MANUFACTURERS SPECIFICATIONS.2. DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS. REFERENCE NUMBER 065-255a.NOTES:LEGENDSECTION/ELEVATION524311. TORO WIRELESS RAIN SENSOR MODEL NO. TWRFS REFER TO PLAN FOR SENSOR LOCATIONNOTEMOUNT SENSOR VERTICALLY.AVOID PLACEMENT UNDEREVE OR TREE CANOPY.LOCATE WITHIN 300 FEET OFSENSOR RECEIVER ANDCONTROLLER1/41/81/213/42. ADJUSTABLE MOUNTING BRACKET3. THUMB SCREW4. RAIN GUTTER (CROSS SECTION)5. ANTENNANOT TO SCALEJUMBO VALVE BOX & COVERFLOW SENSOR PER SPECIFICATIONSPVC 45 DEGREE ELL (TYP.)73456FINISH GRADE2GRAVEL (1 CU. FT.)CONTINUOUS BRICK SUPPORTS910118141312PVC MALE ADAPTERMINIMUM 10x PIPE DIAMETER UPSTREAM &MINIMUM 5x PIPE DIAMETER DOWNSTREAMOF STRAIGHT PIPECONTROL WIRES WITH 12" MIN.SERVICE COIL AND WATERPROOFWIRE SPLICE CONNECTORS - WIRECOLORS PER SPECIFICATIONSPVC 45 DEGREE ELL (TYP.) BUSHDOWN TO FLOW METER SIZE ASNECESSARYPVC MAINLINE - LENGTH ASREQUIRED - SEE SPECIFICATIONSFOR TYPE AND DEPTHNOTES: SEE PLANS,LEGEND ANDSPECIFICATIONS FORADDITIONAL INSTALLATIONNOTES.VALVE BOX EXTENSIONSAS REQUIREDPVC MALE ADAPTER - BUSH DOWN TOFLOW METER SIZE AS NECESSARYTORO REMOTE CONTROL ELECTRICGLOBE VALVE WITH FLOW CONTROLMODEL NO. 220-27-XX (SEE SPECS.)12558FLOW9142310136711812984365111078LEGEND:1NOTES:1. INSTALLATION TO BE COMPLETED IN ACCORDANCE WITH MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS.2. DO NOT SCALE DRAWING.3. THIS DRAWING IS INTENDED FOR USE BY ARCHITECTS, ENGINEERS, CONTRACTORS, CONSULTANTS AND DESIGN PROFESSIONALSFOR PLANNING PURPOSES ONLY. THIS DRAWING MAY NOT BE USED FOR CONSTRUCTION.4. ALL INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN WAS CURRENT AT THE TIME OF DEVELOPMENT BUT MUST BE REVIEWED AND APPROVED BYTHE PRODUCT MANUFACTURER TO BE CONSIDERED ACCURATE.5. CONTRACTOR'S NOTE: FOR PRODUCT AND COMPANY INFORMATION VISIT www.CADdetails.com/info AND ENTERREFERENCE NUMBER 1A2345678910111213BCDEFGHIDOCUMENTS PREPARED BY CORESTATES, INC.,INCLUDING THIS DOCUMENT, ARE TO BE USEDONLY FOR THE SPECIFIC PROJECT AND SPECIFICUSE FOR WHICH THEY WERE INTENDED. ANYEXTENSION OF USE TO ANY OTHER PROJECTS,BY OWNER OR BY ANY OTHER PARTY, WITHOUTTHE EXPRESSED WRITTEN CONSENT OFCORESTATES, INC. IS DONE UNLAWFULLY ANDAT THE USERS OWN RISK. IF USED IN A WAYOTHER THAN THAT SPECIFICALLY INTENDED,USER WILL HOLD CORESTATES, INC. HARMLESSFROM ALL CLAIMS AND LOSSES.SITE LOCATIONENGINEER SEALDOCUMENTREV DATE COMMENT BYCLIENTCHECKED BY:SHEET NO.JOB #:SCALE:DRAWN BY:DATE:SHEET TITLETHE CONTRACTOR IS SPECIFICALLY CAUTIONED THAT THE LOCATION AND/ORELEVATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES AS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS IS BASED ON DESIGNDRAWINGS, RECORDS OF THE VARIOUS UTILITY COMPANIES, AND WHERE POSSIBLE,MEASUREMENTS TAKEN IN THE FIELD. CORE STATES, INC. DOES NOT GUARANTEETHAT LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE EXACT. THE CONTRACTOR MUST CONTACT THEAPPROPRIATE UTILITY COMPANIES AT LEAST 72 HOURS BEFORE ANY EXCAVATION TOREQUEST EXACT FIELD LOCATIONS OF UTILITIES.Call before you dig.below.Know what'sDOCUMENTS PREPARED BY CORESTATES, INC.,INCLUDING THIS DOCUMENT, ARE TO BE USEDONLY FOR THE SPECIFIC PROJECT AND SPECIFICUSE FOR WHICH THEY WERE INTENDED. ANYEXTENSION OF USE TO ANY OTHER PROJECTS,BY OWNER OR BY ANY OTHER PARTY, WITHOUTTHE EXPRESSED WRITTEN CONSENT OFCORESTATES, INC. IS DONE UNLAWFULLY ANDAT THE USERS OWN RISK. IF USED IN A WAYOTHER THAN THAT SPECIFICALLY INTENDED,USER WILL HOLD CORESTATES, INC. HARMLESSFROM ALL CLAIMS AND LOSSES.CLIENTTHE CONTRACTOR IS SPECIFICALLY CAUTIONED THAT THE LOCATION AND/ORELEVATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES AS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS IS BASED ON DESIGNDRAWINGS, RECORDS OF THE VARIOUS UTILITY COMPANIES, AND WHERE POSSIBLE,MEASUREMENTS TAKEN IN THE FIELD. CORE STATES, INC. DOES NOT GUARANTEETHAT LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE EXACT. THE CONTRACTOR MUST CONTACT THEAPPROPRIATE UTILITY COMPANIES AT LEAST 72 HOURS BEFORE ANY EXCAVATION TOREQUEST EXACT FIELD LOCATIONS OF UTILITIES.Call before you dig.below.Know what'sMcDonald's USA, LLC 4240 JURUPA STREET, SUITE 402 ONTARIO, CA 91761 PHONE (909) 467-8940 TVINCENT@CORE-STATES.COMPRELIMINARY SITEPLANSFOR MCDONALDS ATLOS GATOS, CAMCD.3068610/13/2021KCZM15475 LOS GATOSBLVD,LOS GATOS, CA 95032(004-0582)DateRenewal DateSignature10-18-215-31-23L ICENSE D L ANDSCAPEARCHITECTSTATEOFCALI FOR NIA T H OMAS H .KOCHNo.3602L4.0SPECIFICATIONSLANDSCAPE ARCHITECTTHOMAS H. KOCHFIELD SPOT PLANTS PER PLAN AND SECURE APPROVAL FROM OWNER OR OWNER'S AGENT BEFORE DIGGINGWITH GYPSUM AT THE RATE OF ONE CUP PER 5 GALLON PLANT, WITH A EQUAL RATIO MORE FOR LARGERSIZED PLANT MATERIAL. CANS AND BOXES SHALL BE REMOVED CAREFULLY TO AVOID BREAKING AT THEROOTBALL. REMOVE CANS OR BOXES AFTER PLACEMENT, INCLUDING BOTTOMS OF BOXED SPECIMENS.ALL BACKFILL FOR TREES, SHRUBS AND VINES SHALL BE AS PER FOLLOWS PER 10 CUBIC YARDS:ALL TREES AND SHRUBS SHALL INCLUDE 21 GRAM AGRIFORM FERTILIZER TABLETS AS FOLLOWS:STAKES PER DETAIL AND/OR LOCAL REQUIREMENTS. LOCAL REQUIREMENTS TAKE PRECEDENCE..CLEAN UP AND REMOVE ALL DEBRIS AND SURPLUS MATERIALS UPON COMPLETION OF WORK,ADJUST DEPTH OF PLANT SO IT'S CROWN SHALL STAND AT FINISHED GRADE. ALL PLANTS SHALL BEON DRAWINGS AND LEGENDS. SOIL SHALL BE FIRMLY PRESSED AROUND EACH PLANT AND EXCESS SOIL EACH SECTION OF GROUND COVER SHALL BE THOROUGHLY WATERED, IMMEDIATELY UPON COMPLETIONSTAKE TREES AT TIME OF PLANTING. ALL 15 GALLON TREES SHALL BE STAKED USING LODGE POLEDURING THE COURSE OF THE WORK, REMOVE SURPLUS MATERIALS FROM THE SITE AND LEAVE PREMISES,LEAVING THE PREMISES IN A NEAT AND CLEAN CONDITION, SATISFACTORY TO THE OWNER. REMOVE ALL ALL BOXED AND CONTAINER SPECIMEN PLANT MATERIAL SHALL BE GUARANTEED TO BE IN GOOD HEALTHY AND FLOURISHING CONDITION, OF ACTIVE GROWTH, AT THE END OF ONE YEAR,FINAL INSPECTION OF LAWNS AND PLANTING AREAS WILL BE MADE ONE WEEK PRIOR TO THEDIVISION ONE GENERAL REQUIREMENTS ARE A PART OF THIS SECTION AND APPLY TO THISWORK SPECIFIED IN THIS SECTION: FURNISH ALL LABOR, TOOLS, MATERIALS, APPLIANCES,FROM THE DATE OF ACCEPTANCE BY OWNER. ALL GALLON CONTAINERS SHALL BE GUARANTEED FORAN AUTOMATIC IRRIGATION SYSTEM SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR MAINTAINING MOISTURE REQUIREMENTS.HAND WATERING OF NEWLY PLANTED TREES AND SHRUBS SHALL BE REQUIRED ONCE A WEEK, FOR CONCLUSION OF THE MAINTENANCE PERIOD. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE OWNER OR OWNER'STHE SYSTEM SHALL EFFICIENTLY AND EVENLY IRRIGATE ALL PLANTED AREAS WITH AMINIMUM OF OVER SPRAY, COMPLETE IN EVERY RESPECT AND SHALL BE LEFT READYMATERIAL LIST: A COMPLETE MATERIAL LIST SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE OWNER FORMANUFACTURER, MODEL NUMBERS AND DESCRIPTION OF ALL MATERIAL, AND EQUIPMENTDETAILS. REMOVAL OF DEBRIS, ROCKS, SOIL, ETC., AS A RESULT OF CONTRACTOR'STAGS, LABELS, TIES AND NURSERY STAKES FROM ALL PLANTS, UNLESS DIRECTED OTHERWISE.THE BOTTOMS OF ALL PLANT PITS SHALL BE LOOSENED AN ADDITIONAL 5" BELOW DEPTHS NOTED AND DUSTEDPLANTING PITS FOR GROUND COVER SHALL BE 4" MINIMUM IN DEPTH. PLANTS SHALL BE SPACED AS INDICATEDSIDEWALKS AND ROADS IN A NEAT AND CLEAN CONDITION. EXCESS TOP SOIL IS TO BE REMOVED FROM SITE.THREE WEEKS. CULTIVATE, WEED AND WATER AS REQUIRED DURING MAINTENANCE PERIOD. ALL PLANTINGPLANTS SHALL BE FREE OF DISEASES, INSECTS, PESTS, EGGS OR LARVAE.LOCALITY OF THE PROJECT FOR AT LEAST TWO YEARS.BROUGHT TO THE OWNER, BEFORE SUBMITTING BID.ANY AND ALL REPAIRS FOR DAMAGE RESULTING FROM HIS WORK.UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE BY LANDSCAPE SOILS REPORT:8 CUBIC YARDS OF NITROGEN STABILIZED MULCH PER 1000 SQUARE FEET.30 POUNDS OF 6-20-20 COMMERCIAL FERTILIZER, PER 1000 SQUARE FEET.100 POUNDS OF AGRICULTURAL GYPSUM PER 1000 SQUARE FEET.OF NORMAL GROWTH HABITS. PLANTS SHALL BE HEALTHY, VIGOROUS AND WELL BRANCHED, ANDPLANTS SHALL CONFORM IN AT LEAST THE MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS NOTED ON THE PLAN, LEGENDPLANTS SHALL NOT BE PRUNED, EXCEPT AT THE DIRECTION OF THE OWNER OR OWNER'S AGENT.TREES SHALL HAVE STURDY TRUNKS AND NORMAL BRANCHING, WHICH ARE INTACT ANDALL PLANTS SHALL BE NURSERY GROWN UNDER CLIMATE CONDITIONS SIMILAR TO THOSE IN THE QUANTITIES NECESSARY TO COMPLETE THE WORK SHOWN ON PLANS SHALL BE FURNISHED BYTHE CONTRACTOR. ANY DISCREPANCY IN THE QUANTITIES GIVEN ON PLAN OR LEGEND SHALL BEQUANTITIES GIVEN IN THE DRAWINGS ARE FOR THE CONVENIENCE OF THE CONTRACTOR ONLY.QUANTITIES SHOWN ON PLAN ARE TO BE VERIFIED BY THE CONTRACTOR BEFORE SUBMITTING BID.OR PALETTE. THE ROOT BALL SHALL BE INTACT AND SHOW EVIDENCE OF A WELL DEVELOPED ROOT WITHOUT BEING ROOT BOUND. PLANTS SHALL HAVE GROWN IN THE DELIVERED CONTAINER CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFYING LOCATIONS OF ALL UTILITY LINES, IRRIGATION LINES, ETC.SO THAT PROPER PRECAUTIONS MAY BE TAKEN NOT TO DISTURB OR DAMAGE SUCH IMPROVEMENTS.IN THE EVENT OF CONFLICT BETWEEN UTILITIES, ETC. AND PLANT LOCATIONS, THE CONTRACTOR SHALLPROMPTLY NOTIFY THE OWNER, WHO SHALL ARRANGE FOR THE RELOCATION OF PLANT MATERIAL.FAILING TO FOLLOW THIS PROCEDURE, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL AT HIS OWN EXPENSE, MAKEREMOVE ROCK AND/OR OTHER OBSTRUCTIONS, TO PERMIT PROPER INSTALLATION OF PLANTING MATERIAL.FINISHED GRADES: GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE TO BRING ALL GRADES SCARIFY ALL SOIL WITH THE EXCEPTION OF SLOPES OVER 3:1, TO A MINIMUM DEPTH OF 4".SOIL CONDITIONING: APPLY SOIL CONDITIONERS IN THE FOLLOWING AMOUNTS TO ALL AREASREMOVAL OF ALL ROCKS AND FOREIGN MATTER OVER 1" IN DIAMETER, FROM TILLED AREAS.4.3.2.1.TO + .10 PERCENT IN LANDSCAPE AREAS.GRADING AND SOIL PREPARATION:B._A.EXECUTIONWITHOUT CUTS OR ABRASIONS.DENSELY FOLIATED WHEN IN LEAF.SYSTEM FOR AT LEAST ONE YEAR.A WORKMANSHIP LIKE MANNER, STANDARD TO THE INDUSTRY, TO THE SATISFACTIONTO BE USED ON PROJECT.QUALITY CONTROLOF THE OWNER OR OWNER'S AGENT.APPROVAL PRIOR TO PERFORMING WORK. MATERIAL LIST SHALL INCLUDE THEC.1.FINAL INSPECTION:6 MONTHS FROM THE DATE OF ACCEPTANCE BY OWNER. ALL GUARANTEES SHALL BE INTHE AGREEMENT, GENERAL CONDITIONS, SUPPLEMENTARY GENERAL CONDITIONS ANDTEXTS, PERMITS, TAXES, ETC., NECESSARY FOR THE INSTALLATION OF A COMPLETEIRRIGATION SYSTEM AS SPECIFIED AND SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS, LEGENDS AND IRRIGATION SPECIFICATIONSGENERAL REQUIREMENTSSECTION, AS IF FULLY REPEATED HERE.WRITING AND A PART OF THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS.AREAS SHALL BE FREE OF WEEDS AT CONCLUSION OF MAINTENANCE PERIOD.AGENT, 3 WORKING DAYS PRIOR TO INSPECTION.WORK, FROM THE SITE.ALL WORK SHALL BE PER LOCAL, COUNTY AND STATE CODES AND, PERFORMED IN FOR OPERATION, TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE OWNER OR OWNER'S AGENT.2.3.SCOPE1.B.A.I.MAINTENANCE:H.PLANTING SPECIFICATIONSPERFORM ALL FINISHED GRADING AND REMOVAL OF EXISTING WEEDS.FURNISH AND INSTALL ALL STAKING AND GUYING.PROVIDE SIXTY (60) DAY MAINTENANCE OF PLANTING.WHEN FINE GRADING AND SOIL PREPARATION ARE COMPLETED.FINAL ACCEPTANCE OF PLANTING BY THE OWNER OR HIS AGENT.REQUIRED FOR THE FOLLOWING PARTS OF THE WORK:A. THE AGREEMENT, GENERAL CONDITIONS, SUPPLEMENTARY GENERAL CONDITIONS ANDDIVISION ONE GENERAL REQUIREMENTS ARE A PART OF THIS SECTION AND APPLY TO THISSCOPE: FURNISH AND INSTALL ALL LANDSCAPE PLANTING COMPLETE AS INDICATED ON THEDRAWINGS AS SPECIFIED HEREIN, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE FOLLOWING:SAMPLES OF PREPARED PLANTING MIXTURE AND SOIL ADDITIVES, SHALL BE SUBMITTEDSUBSTITUTIONS WILL NOT BE PERMITTED, EXCEPT IF PROOF IS SUBMITTED THATANY MATERIAL SPECIFIED IS NOT OBTAINABLE, THEN A PROPOSAL WILL BE CONSIDERED FORTHE USE OF THE NEAREST EQUIVALENT, WITH AN EQUITABLE ADJUSTMENT OF CONTRACTPRICE. ALL SUBSTITUTIONS ARE SUBJECT TO APPROVAL OF THE OWNER OR HIS AGENT.GUARANTEE: ALL TREES SHALL BE GUARANTEED FOR A PERIOD OF ONE YEAR AND ALLOTHER PLANT MATERIAL SHALL BE GUARANTEED FOR A PERIOD OF SIX (6) MONTHS, UPONMAINTENANCE PERIOD: CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN ALL PLANTING AND PLANT MATERIAL FORA PERIOD OF SIXTY (60) DAYS, AFTER COMPLETION AND FINAL ACCEPTANCE OF WORK BY OWNER.INSPECTIONS: ALL INSPECTIONS HEREIN SPECIFIED SHALL BE MADE BY THE OWNER ORHIS AGENT. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REQUEST INSPECTIONS AT LEAST THREE WORKINGDAYS IN ADVANCE OF THE TIME INSPECTION IS REQUIRED. INSPECTIONS SHALL BEPLANT MATERIAL AFTER DELIVERY TO SITE, FOR FIELD SPOTTING BY OWNER OR HIS AGENT.SPECIMEN TREES AT SOURCE, FOR TAGGING BY OWNER OR HIS AGENT.FINAL INSPECTION OF COMPLETED PLANTING BY OWNER OR HIS AGENT.COMMERCIAL FERTILIZER SHALL CONSIST OF THE FOLLOWING GUARANTEED PERCENTAGES DELIVEREDIN SACKS WITH MANUFACTURER'S LABEL SHOWING WEIGHT AND ANALYSIS ON EACH SACK:6(N)-20(P)-20(K). ORGANIC AMENDMENTS SHALL BE DERIVED FROM NITROGEN STABILIZEDORGANIC RESIDUES AND SHALL BE AERATED, FREE OF OBJECTIONABLE ODOR AND PLANTS SHALL BE NURSERY GROWN AND TYPICAL OF THEIR SPECIES OR VARIETY AND SHALL BESOIL SULFUR OF STANDARD COMMERCIAL GRADE.OF VIABLE WEED SEED.SOIL AMENDMENTS:GYPSUM OF STANDARD AGRICULTURAL GRADE.PLANT MATERIALS:B.A.MATERIALSD.B.C.TO OWNER FOR ACCEPTANCE.A.4.3.2.B.A.SECTION AS FULLY AS IF REPEATED HERE.PROVIDE AND PLACE ALL SOIL ADDITIVES.FURNISH AND PLACE ALL SOIL MIXES.FURNISH AND INSTALL PLANT MATERIALS.GUARANTEES.QUALITY CONTROLCLEANUP.SAMPLES AND DELIVERY OF MATERIALS:1.C.6.8.7.5.4.B.1.3.2.GENERAL REQUIREMENTS7 CUBIC YARDS OF NATIVE TOP SOIL.10 POUNDS OF FERRIC SULFATE.SET IN A WATERING BASIN. 6 TABLETS FOR 24" BOX OR LARGER4 TABLETS PER 15 GALLON PLANT.3 TABLETS PER 5 GALLON PLANT.1 TABLET PER 1 GALLON PLANT.GROUND COVER PLANTING:REMOVED FROM CROWN. 3 CUBIC YARDS OF NITROGEN STABILIZED MULCH.20 POUNDS OF 6-20-20 COMMERCIAL FERTILIZER.100 POUNDS OF AGRICULTURAL GYPSUM.GUARANTEE AND REPLACEMENT:G.CLEAN UP:F.STAKING:OF PLANTING.E.D..TURF AND PLANTINGSPITS. MAKE NECESSARY ADJUSTMENTS IN LOCATIONS AND EXCAVATE PITS AS FOLLOWS:1 GALLON5 GALLON15 GALLON24" BOX36" BOX48" BOXPLANT SIZE:C.41"15"25"PIT WIDTH:4.0'7.5'5.5'10.5"20.5"30.5"22"PIT DEPTH:36"32"BY OWNER.IRRIGATION HEADS:AUTOMATIC CONTROLLER:REMOTE CONTROL VALVES:PARALLEL IRRIGATION LINES SHALL NOT BE INSTALLED DIRECTLY OVER EACH OTHER.INSTALL PER MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS. REMOTE CONTROL VALVESSHALL BE CONNECTED TO CONTROLLER IN NUMERICAL SEQUENCE, AS PER PLAN.HIGH VOLTAGE WIRING FOR AUTOMATIC CONTROLLER:120 VOLT POWER CONNECTION TO AUTOMATIC CONTROLLER SHALL BE PROVIDEDALL ELECTRICAL WORK SHALL CONFORM TO LOCAL, CITY AND COUNTY CODE.INSTALL PER PLAN AND IRRIGATION DETAILS. WHEN VALVES ARE GROUPED TOGETHERALLOW AT LEAST TWELVE INCHES BETWEEN VALVES. INSTALL EACH CONTROL VALVEIN A SEPARATE VALVE BOX.INSTALL IRRIGATION HEADS AS PER PLAN AND IRRIGATION DETAILS. SPACING OF HEADSSHALL NOT EXCEED THE MAXIMUM INDICATED ON DRAWINGS. CONTRACTOR TOPROVIDE FULL COVERAGE IN ALL PLANTED AREAS, WITH A MINIMUM OF OVER SPRAY.FLUSHING OF IRRIGATION SYSTEM:AFTER ALL IRRIGATION LINES AND RISERS ARE IN PLACE AND FULLY CONNECTED, PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF IRRIGATION HEADS, THE CONTROL VALVES SHALL BE OPENED AND SYSTEM FULLY FLUSHED.IRRIGATION HEADS SHALL BE INSTALLED ONLY AFTER FLUSHING OF THE SYSTEMHAS BEEN COMPLETED AND INSPECTED BY OWNER OR OWNER'S AGENT.ADJUSTMENT OF IRRIGATION SYSTEM:THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FLUSH AND ADJUST ALL IRRIGATION HEADS FOR OPTIMUMPERFORMANCE AND TO PREVENT OVER SPRAY ON WALKS, ROADWAYS AND BUILDINGS.IF IT IS DETERMINED THAT ADJUSTMENTS OF THE IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT WILL PROVIDEMORE ADEQUATE COVERAGE, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAKE SUCH ADJUSTMENTSPRIOR TO PLANTING. ADJUSTMENTS MAY ALSO INCLUDE CHANGES IN NOZZLE SIZESAND DEGREES OF ARC AS REQUIRED, AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO OWNER.ALL IRRIGATION HEADS SHALL BE SET PERPENDICULAR TO FINISHED GRADES UNLESSOTHERWISE INDICATED ON PLAN.TESTING, MAINTENANCE AND GUARANTEESTEST ALL PRESSURE LINES AND ALL PIPING UNDER PAVING WITH HYDROSTATICPRESSURE OF 150 PSI FOR 24 HOURS.PIPE, ETC., AS REQUIRED AND RETEST AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO OWNER.WHEN IRRIGATION SYSTEM IS COMPLETED, PERFORM TEST COVERAGE IN PRESENCE OF OWNER.AREAS THAT ARE NOT FULLY COVERED SHALL BE ADJUSTED AS REQUIRED UNTIL FULL COVERAGE IS OBTAINED, AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO OWNER.MAINTENANCE PERIOD FOR IRRIGATION SYSTEM SHALL BE 60 DAYS FROM DATE OF ACCEPTANCE.CONTRACTOR SHALL GUARANTEE IRRIGATION SYSTEM AND EQUIPMENT FOR A PERIOD OF ONE CALENDAR YEAR FROM DATE OF ACCEPTANCE BY OWNER.QUICK COUPLING VALVE INSTALLED.ALL PVC PIPE SHALL BE TRANSPORTED IN A VEHICLE WHICH ALLOWS THE LENGTHS OF PIPE TOLAY FLAT SO AS NOT TO SUBJECT THE PIPE TO BINDING, BENDING, OR CONCENTRATEDANY SECTION OF PIPE THAT HAS BEEN DENTED OR DAMAGED WILL BE DISCARDED AND IFINSTALLED, SHALL BE REPLACED WITH NEW PIPING AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE OWNER.PRODUCT DELIVERY, STORAGE AND HANDLING:EXTERNAL LOADS AT ANY POINT.1.2.EXECUTIONA.D.C.B.A.13.C.SHALL BE #14 UNLESS SPECIFIED OTHERWISE.CYCLE VALVE AS NOTED IN IRRIGATION LEGEND.ALL VALVES TO BE AS NOTED IN IRRIGATION LEGEND.ALL DRIPLINE SHALL BE AS NOTED IN IRRIGATION LEGEND.MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS. FIELD SPLICES BETWEEN VALVE AND CONTROLLER WILLNOT BE ALLOWED UNLESS WRITTEN PERMISSION IS OBTAINED FROM OWNER. ALL WIRINGWIRING SHALL OCCUPY THE SAME TRENCH AND SHALL BE INSTALLED ALONG THE SAMEROUTE AS THE PRESSURE SUPPLY LINE WHENEVER POSSIBLE.WIRING SHALL BE TAPED TOGETHER AT INTERVALS OF TEN FEET.EXPANSION COILS SHALL BE PROVIDED EVERY 100' OF WIRING.ALL SPLICES SHALL BE MADE WITH 3M WATERPROOF SPLICES OR EQUAL.THE AUTOMATIC CONTROLLER SHALL BE AS NOTED IN IRRIGATION LEGEND.THE ELECTRIC CONTROL VALVE SHALL BE A NORMALLY CLOSED, 24 VOLT, 60ALL VALVES TO BE IN BROOKS PLASTIC BOXES WITH COVERS, OR EQUAL.CONNECTION BETWEEN THE AUTOMATIC CONTROLLERS AND THE ELECTRIC CONTROL VALVESSHALL BE MADE WITH DIRECT BURIAL COPPER WIRE. CONTROL WIRE SHALL BE WHITE WITH A DIFFERENT COLOR STRIPE FOR EACH AUTOMATIC VALVE. INSTALL IN ACCORDANCE WITHTWO VALVES KEYS FOR GATE VALVES.TWO KEYS FOR EACH AUTOMATIC CONTROLLER.SUPPLY AS A PART OF THE CONTRACT THE FOLLOWING:TWO QUICK COUPLER KEYS AND MATCHING HOSE SWIVELS, FOR EACH TYPE OF1. DRIPLINECONTROL VALVE BOXESEQUIPMENT TO BE FURNISHED:B.C.1.A. L.1.1.K.2.J.:CONTROL WIRINGAUTOMATIC CONTROLLER:ELECTRIC CONTROL VALVE:3.1.I.5.4.H.2.1,G.A.B.12.B.A.11.A.A.10.9.B.8.A.7.A.AFTER TESTING, IF LEAKS DEVELOP, REPLACE JOINTS,WATER SUPPLY:BACK FILLING:ELECTRICAL SUPPLY:IRRIGATION DRAWINGS ARE DIAGRAMMATIC AND INDICATE THE WORK TO BE INSTALLED.DUE TO THE SCALE OF THE DRAWINGS, IT IS NOT POSSIBLE TO INDICATE ALL OFFSETS,FITTINGS, SLEEVES, ETC., WHICH MAY BE REQUIRED. ALL SCALED DIMENSIONS AREAPPROXIMATE. CONTRACTOR SHALL CHECK AND VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS BEFORESUBMITTING BID TO OWNER AND PRIOR TO STARTING ANY WORK.EXERCISE EXTREME CARE IN EXCAVATING AND WORKING NEAR EXISTING UTILITIES.CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR DAMAGES TO UTILITIES WHICH ARE CAUSED BYHIS WORK OR NEGLECT. CHECK EXISTING UTILITIES DRAWINGS, CIVIL DRAWINGS AND ARCHITECTURALDRAWINGS FOR NEW AND EXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONS BEFORE ANY START OF WORK.PRIOR TO INSTALLATION, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL STAKE OUT ALL PRESSURE SUPPLYLOCATIONS, VALVES, HEADS AND CONTROLLERS.CONNECT IRRIGATION SYSTEM TO GATE VALVE OR METER, AS SUPPLIED BY OWNER.CONFIRM WATER SUPPLY BEFORE SUBMITTING BID AND START OF WORK.CONNECT ELECTRICAL CONNECTIONS FOR AUTOMATIC CONTROLLER TO NEAREST 120 VOLTSOURCE, AS SUPPLIED BY OWNER. CONFIRM LOCATION BEFORE SUBMITTING BID.DIG TRENCHES STRAIGHT AND TRUE. SUPPORT PIPE CONTINUOUSLY ON BOTTOMOF TRENCH. LAY PIPE TO AN EVEN GRADE. TRENCHING EXCAVATION SHALLFOLLOW APPROXIMATE LAYOUT AS INDICATED ON PLAN.PROVIDE MINIMUM COVER OF 18" FOR ALL PRESSURE BEARING LINES.PROVIDE MINIMUM COVER OF 12" FOR ALL LATERAL LINESPROVIDE MINIMUM COVER OF 18" FOR ALL CONTROL WIRING.TRENCHES SHALL NOT BE BACK FILLED UNTIL ALL REQUIRED TESTS ARE PERFORMEDTRENCHES SHALL BE CAREFULLY BACK FILLED WITH THE EXCAVATED MATERIAL, FREEFROM LARGE CLODS OF EARTH OR STONES EXCEEDING 1/2" IN DIAMETER. BACKFILLSHALL BE COMPACTED TO A DRY DENSITY EQUAL TO ADJACENT GRADES WITHOUTDIPS, SUNKEN AREAS, HUMPS OR OTHER IRREGULARITIES.FLOODING OF TRENCHES SHALL NOT BE PERMITTED.IF SETTLEMENT OCCURS AND SUBSEQUENT ADJUSTMENT IN PIPE, VALVES, SPRINKLERHEADS, LAWNS, PLANTING, ETC., ARE NECESSARY, THE CONTRACTOR SHALLMAKE ALL REQUIRED ADJUSTMENTS, AT ON COST TO THE OWNER.TRENCHING AND BACK FILLING UNDER PAVING:TRENCHES LOCATED UNDER AREAS OF PAVING, ASPHALT, CONCRETE OR FOUNDATIONSSHALL BE BACK FILLED WITH SAND, 6" MINIMUM BELOW PIPE AND 3" MINIMUMABOVE PIPE. FIELD COMPACT TO 95% COMPACTED. ALL TRENCHES SHALL BELEFT FLUSH WITH ADJOINING GRADE. CONTRACTOR SHALL SET IN PLACE ALL PIPINGAND CAP AS REQUIRED, AND PRESSURE TEST ALL PIPING PRIOR TO PAVING.WHERE ANY CUTTING OR BREAKING OF CONCRETE OR PAVING IS NECESSARY,IT SHALL BE DONE AND REPLACED BY THE CONTRACTOR AS PART OF CONTRACT COST.LINE CLEARANCE:THE OWNER, IN WRITING, PRIOR TO WORK.ALL LINES SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM CLEARANCE OF 6" FROM LINES OF OTHER TRADES.PERMISSION TO CUT OR BREAK CONCRETE OR PAVING SHALL BE OBTAINED FROMALL PVC PIPE MUST BEAR THE FOLLOWING MARKINGS:BE OF TYPE PRESCRIBED BY MANUFACTURER.MANUFACTURERS AND THEIR ADDRESSEES, AND THEIR PHONE NUMBERS.COMPLETE OPERATING AND MAINTENANCE INSTRUCTIONS FOR ALL EQUIPMENT.GENERAL: USE ONLY NEW MATERIAL AS NOTED ON DRAWINGS, LEGENDS AND SPECIFIED HEREIN.PIPE SHALL BE MADE FROM AN NSF APPROVED TYPE I, GRADE I, PVC, CONFORMINGTO ASTM RESIN SPECIFICATION D1784. ALL PIPE MUST MEET REQUIREMENTS AS SET FORTHALL FITTINGS SHALL BE SCH. 40, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE ON PLANS OR DETAILS.SOLVENT CEMENT AND PRIMER FOR PVC SOLVENT WELDED PIPE AND FITTINGS SHALLNON-PRESSURE LATERAL LINE PIPING SHALL BE PVC CLASS 200 WITH SOLVENTWELDED JOINTS UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE ON PLANS OR LEGENDS.PIPE SHALL BE MADE FROM NSF APPROVED TYPE I, GRADE II PVC COMPOUNDCONFORMING TO ASTM RESIN SPECIFICATION D1784. ALL PIPE MUST MEETREQUIREMENTS SET FORTH IN FEDERAL SPECIFICATIONS PS-22-70QUICK COUPLING VALVE SHALL HAVE A BRASS BODY DESIGNED FOR A MINIMUMTHE BACKFLOW PREVENTER SHALL OPERATE ON A REDUCED PRESSURE PRINCIPALGATE VALVES SHALL BE BRONZE BODY PER IRRIGATION LEGEND.GATE VALVES:QUICK COUPLING VALVES:PVC NON-PRESSURE LATERAL LINE PIPING:WORKING PRESSURE OF 150 PSI.BACKFLOW PREVENTION UNIT:AS PER IRRIGATION LEGEND.1.1. 1.F.E,D.1.2.C.PVC PRESSURE MAINLINE PIPE AND FITTINGS:IN FEDERAL SPECIFICATION PS-22-70.1.4.B.C.A.2.3.B.A.MATERIALSSIZE, CLASS AND PRESSURE RATING.NOMINAL PIPE SIZE.MANUFACTURER'S NAME.GUARANTEE STATEMENTS.2.3.6.A.B.A.5.C.B.A.4.D.C.B.TRENCHING:A.3.A.2.CONNECTION TO EXISTING ELECTRICAL POWER.2. AS BUILT DRAWINGS: AFTER COMPLETION OF IRRIGATION SYSTEM, THE CONTRACTORSHALL SUBMIT TO THE OWNER, ON REPRODUCIBLE MEDIA OR DISK THE FOLLOWINGDIMENSIONED FROM TWO PERMANENT POINTS OF REFERENCE:PREPARE AND DELIVER TO THE OWNER WITHIN 10 CALENDAR DAYS PRIOR TOTHE COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION, TWO HARD COVER BINDERS CONTAININGINDEX SHEET, STATING CONTRACTOR'S PHONE NUMBER, ADDRESS, LIST OF EQUIPMENTOPERATION AND MAINTENANCE MANUALS:A.3.G.H.A.D. F.E.B.C. CONTROLLER AND WATER SENSORS.BACKFLOW PREVENTER.THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION:1. ROUTING OF CONTROL WIRING.QUICK COUPLING VALVES.POINT OF CONNECTION.ROUTING OF MAIN LINES.GATE VALVES.C.A.1.INSTALLATION:3.B.2.1.LAYOUT:. LOS G A T O S R O A D YOUTHANKTHRU DRIV E THRU DRIV ETHRUDRIVENO PARKINGNO PARKINGDRIVETHRU48414"SEQUOIA48315"SEQUOIA48215"/13"OAK48115"SEQUOIA480 THROUGH 465 (SEE ARBORIST REPORT)46423"PINUS C.46320"PINUS C.46222"PINUS C.48530"PINUS H.48615"SEQUOIA48723"SEQUOIA48817"SEQUOIA48920"SEQUOIA49118"SEQUOIA49012"OAK49222"PINUS C.49311"PINUS C.49427"PINUS C.49526.5"PINUS C.49625.5"PINUS C.49731"PINUS C.4987"SEQUOIA49928"SEQUOIA50033"SEQUOIA50129"SEQUOIA50211"/11"OLIVE50346"CEDAR821518.5"PLATANUS50436"SEQUOIA5057"/9"/9"OLIVE821415.5"PLATANUS NOTE: PROTECT THE TRUNKS OF TREES #492 THROUGH #497 BY WRAPPING WITH WATTLE OR BRACING WITH TIMBERS (SEE APPENDIX D SHEET T1.1).LEGEND46222"PINUS C.TREE NUMBER FROM ARBORIST REPORTTRUNK DIAMETERTREE SPECIESDRIPLINE NOTE: REMOVE TREES # 489, #491 SEE L1.0 PLANTING PLAN FOR REPLACEMENT TREES. ALL OTHER TREES ARE TO REMAIN AND TO BE PROTECTED IN PLACE.TREE NUMBERS 489 & 491ARE TO BE REMOVED NOTE: REFER TO ARBORIST REPORT DATED APRIL 28, 2021 FROM; MONARCH CONSULTING ARBORIST RICHARD GESSNER P.O. BOX 1010 FENTON, CA 95018 1 831 331 8982 www.monarcharborists.com1A2345678910111213BCDEFGHIDOCUMENTS PREPARED BY CORESTATES, INC.,INCLUDING THIS DOCUMENT, ARE TO BE USEDONLY FOR THE SPECIFIC PROJECT AND SPECIFICUSE FOR WHICH THEY WERE INTENDED. ANYEXTENSION OF USE TO ANY OTHER PROJECTS,BY OWNER OR BY ANY OTHER PARTY, WITHOUTTHE EXPRESSED WRITTEN CONSENT OFCORESTATES, INC. IS DONE UNLAWFULLY ANDAT THE USERS OWN RISK. IF USED IN A WAYOTHER THAN THAT SPECIFICALLY INTENDED,USER WILL HOLD CORESTATES, INC. HARMLESSFROM ALL CLAIMS AND LOSSES.SITE LOCATIONENGINEER SEALDOCUMENTREV DATE COMMENT BYCLIENTCHECKED BY:SHEET NO.JOB #:SCALE:DRAWN BY:DATE:SHEET TITLETHE CONTRACTOR IS SPECIFICALLY CAUTIONED THAT THE LOCATION AND/ORELEVATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES AS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS IS BASED ON DESIGNDRAWINGS, RECORDS OF THE VARIOUS UTILITY COMPANIES, AND WHERE POSSIBLE,MEASUREMENTS TAKEN IN THE FIELD. CORE STATES, INC. DOES NOT GUARANTEETHAT LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE EXACT. THE CONTRACTOR MUST CONTACT THEAPPROPRIATE UTILITY COMPANIES AT LEAST 72 HOURS BEFORE ANY EXCAVATION TOREQUEST EXACT FIELD LOCATIONS OF UTILITIES.Call before you dig.below.Know what'sDOCUMENTS PREPARED BY CORESTATES, INC.,INCLUDING THIS DOCUMENT, ARE TO BE USEDONLY FOR THE SPECIFIC PROJECT AND SPECIFICUSE FOR WHICH THEY WERE INTENDED. ANYEXTENSION OF USE TO ANY OTHER PROJECTS,BY OWNER OR BY ANY OTHER PARTY, WITHOUTTHE EXPRESSED WRITTEN CONSENT OFCORESTATES, INC. IS DONE UNLAWFULLY ANDAT THE USERS OWN RISK. IF USED IN A WAYOTHER THAN THAT SPECIFICALLY INTENDED,USER WILL HOLD CORESTATES, INC. HARMLESSFROM ALL CLAIMS AND LOSSES.CLIENTTHE CONTRACTOR IS SPECIFICALLY CAUTIONED THAT THE LOCATION AND/ORELEVATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES AS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS IS BASED ON DESIGNDRAWINGS, RECORDS OF THE VARIOUS UTILITY COMPANIES, AND WHERE POSSIBLE,MEASUREMENTS TAKEN IN THE FIELD. CORE STATES, INC. DOES NOT GUARANTEETHAT LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE EXACT. THE CONTRACTOR MUST CONTACT THEAPPROPRIATE UTILITY COMPANIES AT LEAST 72 HOURS BEFORE ANY EXCAVATION TOREQUEST EXACT FIELD LOCATIONS OF UTILITIES.Call before you dig.below.Know what'sMcDonald's USA, LLC 4240 JURUPA STREET, SUITE 402 ONTARIO, CA 91761 PHONE (909) 467-8940 TVINCENT@CORE-STATES.COMPRELIMINARY SITEPLANSFOR MCDONALDS ATLOS GATOS, CAMCD.3068610/13/2021KCZM15475 LOS GATOSBLVD,LOS GATOS, CA 95032(004-0582)1" = 20'02010205GRAPHIC SCALELANDSCAPE ARCHITECTTHOMAS H. KOCHDateRenewal DateSignature10-18-215-31-23L ICENSE D L ANDSCAPEARCHITECTSTATEOFCALI FOR NIA T H OMAS H .KOCHNo.3602T1.0EXISTING TREEINVENTORY 1A2345678910111213BCDEFGHIDOCUMENTS PREPARED BY CORESTATES, INC.,INCLUDING THIS DOCUMENT, ARE TO BE USEDONLY FOR THE SPECIFIC PROJECT AND SPECIFICUSE FOR WHICH THEY WERE INTENDED. ANYEXTENSION OF USE TO ANY OTHER PROJECTS,BY OWNER OR BY ANY OTHER PARTY, WITHOUTTHE EXPRESSED WRITTEN CONSENT OFCORESTATES, INC. IS DONE UNLAWFULLY ANDAT THE USERS OWN RISK. IF USED IN A WAYOTHER THAN THAT SPECIFICALLY INTENDED,USER WILL HOLD CORESTATES, INC. HARMLESSFROM ALL CLAIMS AND LOSSES.SITE LOCATIONENGINEER SEALDOCUMENTREV DATE COMMENT BYCLIENTCHECKED BY:SHEET NO.JOB #:SCALE:DRAWN BY:DATE:SHEET TITLETHE CONTRACTOR IS SPECIFICALLY CAUTIONED THAT THE LOCATION AND/ORELEVATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES AS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS IS BASED ON DESIGNDRAWINGS, RECORDS OF THE VARIOUS UTILITY COMPANIES, AND WHERE POSSIBLE,MEASUREMENTS TAKEN IN THE FIELD. CORE STATES, INC. DOES NOT GUARANTEETHAT LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE EXACT. THE CONTRACTOR MUST CONTACT THEAPPROPRIATE UTILITY COMPANIES AT LEAST 72 HOURS BEFORE ANY EXCAVATION TOREQUEST EXACT FIELD LOCATIONS OF UTILITIES.Call before you dig.below.Know what'sDOCUMENTS PREPARED BY CORESTATES, INC.,INCLUDING THIS DOCUMENT, ARE TO BE USEDONLY FOR THE SPECIFIC PROJECT AND SPECIFICUSE FOR WHICH THEY WERE INTENDED. ANYEXTENSION OF USE TO ANY OTHER PROJECTS,BY OWNER OR BY ANY OTHER PARTY, WITHOUTTHE EXPRESSED WRITTEN CONSENT OFCORESTATES, INC. IS DONE UNLAWFULLY ANDAT THE USERS OWN RISK. IF USED IN A WAYOTHER THAN THAT SPECIFICALLY INTENDED,USER WILL HOLD CORESTATES, INC. HARMLESSFROM ALL CLAIMS AND LOSSES.CLIENTTHE CONTRACTOR IS SPECIFICALLY CAUTIONED THAT THE LOCATION AND/ORELEVATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES AS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS IS BASED ON DESIGNDRAWINGS, RECORDS OF THE VARIOUS UTILITY COMPANIES, AND WHERE POSSIBLE,MEASUREMENTS TAKEN IN THE FIELD. CORE STATES, INC. DOES NOT GUARANTEETHAT LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE EXACT. THE CONTRACTOR MUST CONTACT THEAPPROPRIATE UTILITY COMPANIES AT LEAST 72 HOURS BEFORE ANY EXCAVATION TOREQUEST EXACT FIELD LOCATIONS OF UTILITIES.Call before you dig.below.Know what'sMcDonald's USA, LLC 4240 JURUPA STREET, SUITE 402 ONTARIO, CA 91761 PHONE (909) 467-8940 TVINCENT@CORE-STATES.COMPRELIMINARY SITEPLANSFOR MCDONALDS ATLOS GATOS, CAMCD.3068610/13/2021KCZM15475 LOS GATOSBLVD,LOS GATOS, CA 95032(004-0582)LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTTHOMAS H. KOCHDateRenewal DateSignature10-18-215-31-23L ICENSE D L ANDSCAPEARCHITECTSTATEOFCALI FOR NIA T H OMAS H .KOCHNo.3602T1.1TREE NOTES & DETAILS NOTE: REFER TO ARBORIST REPORT DATED APRIL 28, 2021 FROM; MONARCH CONSULTING ARBORIST RICHARD GESSNER P.O. BOX 1010 FENTON, CA 95018 1 831 331 8982 www.monarcharborists.com