Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
16982 Kennedy Rd - Staff Report and Exhibits 1-11
DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT : TOWN OF LOS GATOS PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT APRIL 4, 2017 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING DATE: 04/12/2017 ITEM NO : 6 JOEL PAULSON, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR ARCHITECTURE AND SITE APPLICATIONS S-16-050 (Lot 8) and S-16-051 (Lot 9). PROJECT LOCATION: 16982 KENNEDY ROAD. PROPERTY APPLICANT: D&C DEVELOPMENT INC . PROPERTY OWNER: GSI. LLC. REQUESTING APPROVAL TO DEMOLISH AN EXISTING SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE, REMOVE A SECOND UNIT, AND CONSTRUCT TWO NEW SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCES ON PROPERTIES ZONED R-1:8. APN: 532-35- 060. DEEMED COMPLETE: MARCH 20, 2017 FINAL DATE TO TAKE ACTION: SEPTEMBER 20,2017 RECOMMENDATION: Approvat subject to the recommended Conditions of Approval. PROJECT DATA: General Plan Designation : Low Density Residential Zoning Designation: R-1:8-Single-Family Residential, 8,000-square foot lot minimum Applicable Plans & Standards: General Plan; Residential Design Guidelines Parcel Sizes : 7,340 and 6,452 square feet Surrounding Area: i Existing Land Use i General Plan i Zoning -~~~7~-~:-~~~;~:: ··----------+ ~~~-~:~-;~{~ ::::~~-~~~~-:--·--.. ----~ :~ ~~: ----·-··------·--·-·----·---~-------·-·--·--·-----..... __________________________ +--·-----.. -·---·----.... ------·-·--·-·---.. -·---............ -----f--·---·---..... __________ .. _________ _ South I Residential i Low Density Residential i R-1:8 -w~t--rRe~iid~-~t~-----------···----TL~;·-oe~-~~tv·-R-~-~-id"~-~ti.~I ··-·------TR-=-i:-8 ______ --·-------- PREPARED BY : AZHAR KHAN Assistant Planner Reviewed by: Planning Manager and Community Development Director 110 E. Main Street Los Gatos, CA 95030 • 408-354-6874 www .losgatosca .gov PAGE 2 OF 7 SUBJECT: 16982 KENNEDY ROAD/S-16-050 (Lot 8) AND S-16-051 (Lot 9) APRIL 4, 2017 ~: The project is Categorically Exempt pursuant to the adopted Guidelines for the Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act, Section 15303: New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures. FINDINGS: • As required by Section 29.10.330 of the Town Code for the elimination of an existing secondary dwelling unit. • As required by Section 29.10.09030(e) ofthe Town Code for the demolition of an existing structure. • As required by the Residential Design Guidelines that the project complies with the Residential Design Guidelines. CONSIDERATIONS: • As required by Section 29.20.150 ofthe Town Code for granting approval of an Architecture and Site application. ACTION : The decision of the Planning Commission is final unless appealed within ten days . BACKGROUND: On August 23, 2016, a Certificate of Compliance was issued to establish the existence of two legal lots on the subject property. Both lots are non-conforming for lot size, and Lot 8 is also non-conforming for frontage. On May 11, 2016, the Historic Preservation Committee found that the existing residence has no historical significance or architectural merit (Exhibit 6). The 13,792-square foot site currently contains a primary residence, a second dwelling unit, and an accessory structure that includes a garage for the primary residence . The applicant is requesting approval to demolish the existing structures, and construct one new single-family residence on each lot. The project is being reviewed by the Planning Commission due to the request for removal of an existing secondary dwelling unit. N:\OEV\PC REPORTS\2017\Kennedy Road 16982 04.12.17.docx 4/4/2017 12:21 PM PAGE 3 OF 7 SUBJECT: 1 6 982 KENNEDY ROAD /S-16 -050 (Lot 8) AND S-1 6 -05 1 (Lo t 9 ) APRIL 4, 201 7 PROJECT DESCRIPTION : A . Architecture and Site Application Architecture and Site approval is required to construct a new residence . B. Location and Surrounding Neighborhood The subject site is located on the south side of Kennedy Road , approximately 600 feet ea st of Los Gatos Boulevard (E xhibit 1). The property i s surrounded by single -family re sidential uses. C. Zoning Compliance A single-family residence is a permitted use in the R-1 :8 zone . The proposed residences are in compliance with the allowable floor area for the properties. Additionally, the proposed residences are in compliance with height, setback, building coverage, and on-site parking requirements. DISCUSSION: A. Architecture and Site Analysi s On Lot 8, the applicant is proposin g a 2,018-square foot sing le-story r esi dence, a 1,427 - square foot cellar, and a 427-square foot detached garage . The re siden ce would have a ma ximum height of 18 feet, nine and one-half inches. Th e proposed materials include : stucco with board and batten gable end treatment, and composition shingle roofin g. On Lot 9, the applicant i s proposing a 2,169-square foot two-s tory re sidence, a 1,297 -square foot cellar, and a 420-square foot attached garage. The residence would have a maximum height of 24 feet, five inches. The proposed materials include: wood shingle s with board and batten gabl e end treatment, stone ve neer columns, and composition shingle roofing. A color and materials board will be available at the Plannin g Commis sion m eeting. Sto ry pole s have been placed on the site to show the location, general m ass in g, and he ig ht of the proposed re sidence s, and Exhibit 5 includes ge neral project data . B. Hou se Si ze and Neighborhood Compatibility Ba se d on Town and County re cord s, the re sid e nces i n the immediate are a ran ge in size from 1,235 square feet to 2,559 square f eet. Th e floor area ratio s (FAR) ran ge from 0.16 to 0.33. N:\DEV\PC REPORTS\201 7\Kennedy Road 169 8 2 04.12.1 7.docx 4/4/2 0 17 1 2 :2 1 PM PAGE 4 OF 7 SUBJECT: 16982 KENNEDY ROAD/S-16-050 (Lot 8) AND S-16-051 (Lot 9) APRIL 4, 2017 The proposed residences would be 2,018 square feet with a 0.27 FAR (Lot 8) and 2,169 square feet with a 0.34 FAR (Lot 9). Within the immediate area, Lot 8 would be the fifth largest home, while Lot 9 would be the fourth largest home with regards to square footage . Lot 8 would have the fourth largest FAR, while Lot 9 would have the largest FAR. Based on lot size, both residences are within the maximum allowed square footage. The maximum allowed square footage for Lot 8 would be 2,432 and 2,183 square feet for Lot 9. The Neighborhood Analysis table below reflects the current conditions in the immediate area . Address House Garage House lot House No. and Size FAR Stories Garage 16982 Kennedy Road(E)* 1,546 -1,546 13,792 0.11 1 16982 Kennedy Road lot 8 (P) 2,018 427 2,445 7,340 0.27 1 16982 Kennedy Road lot 9 (P) 2,169 420 2,589 6,452 0.34 2 16621 Ferris Ave 1,472 480 1,952 7,800 0.19 2 16983 Kennedy Road 2,400 296 2,696 11,050 0.22 1 16995 Kennedy Road 1,797 320 2,117 8,000 0 .22 1 16929 Kennedy Road 2,559 528 3,087 7,680 0.33 2 16998 Kennedy Road 1,235 315 1,550 7,770 0.16 1 16964 Kennedy Road 1,584 440 2,024 7,747 0.20 1 16952 Kennedy Road 2,275 240 2,515 8,052 0.28 2 400 Los Gatos Blvd 1,388 396 1,784 7,800 0.18 1 380 Los Gatos Blvd 1,634 280 1,914 8,091 0.20 1 * Square footag e do es not include existing secondary dwelling unit and a ccessory s tru ctures C. Environmental Review The project is Categorically Exempt pursuant to the adopted Guidelines for the Implementation of California Environmental Quality Act, Section 15303 : New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures . D. Tree Impacts The Town's Consulting Arborist, Walter Levison, visited the site, reviewed the plans, and prepared an Ar borist Report (Exhibit 8). A total of 13 protected trees were surveyed . Seven protected trees are proposed to be removed on the project site (Sheet L1, Exhibit 12). Due to site constraints and existing tree canopy to remain , the applicant may choose to provide an in-lieu fee for trees not replaced on-site (Sheet L1 and page 9 of Exhibit 8). N:\DEV\PC REPORTS\2017\Ke nnedy Ro ad 16982 04.12.17.docx 4/4/2017 1 2:21 PM PAGE 5 OF7 SUBJECT : 16982 KENNEDY ROAD/S-16-050 (Lot 8) AND S-16-051 (Lot 9) APRIL 4, 2017 The Consulting Arborist made recommendations for the proposed water meter upgrade location, trenching, permeable paver driveway, and sewer lines . The applicant has incorporated these changes into the plans. If the project is approved, tree protection measures would be implemented prior to and during construction. Replacement trees would be required to be planted or an in-lieu fee would be required to be paid pursuant to Town Code. Tree protection measures are incorporated as Conditions of Approval (Exhibit 3) to protect the seven protected trees to remain on the subject property and within the development area. E. Second Dwelling Units On January 31, 1986, a second dwelling unit permit was issued for the property located at 16982 Kennedy Road. The applicant is requesting to remove the second dwelling unit in order to accommodate the two new single-family residences on the non-conforming lots, which would be consistent with the property's zoning designation of Single-Family Residential and the General Plan Land Use designation of Low Density Residential. Section 29.10.330 ofthe Town Code requires the deciding body to make five findings to approve the elimination of a second dwelling unit. The first required finding is that the proposed elimination is consistent with the Town's Housing Element of the General Plan. The subject request is consistent with the Housing Element because it would not have a negative impact on the Town's housing stock. The number of approved applications for new second dwelling units in 2016 exceeds the number of applications approved to allow demolition of second dwelling units. The four remaining findings require the Commission to consider the maintenance ofthe Town's housing stock, the preservation of historically significant buildings, the property owner's desire or capacity to maintain the structure, and the economic utility ofthe building or structure, pursuant to Section 29.10.09030(e) of the Town Code for the issuance of a demolition permit (Exhibit 2). F. Design and Compatibility The development plans were reviewed by the Town's Consulting Architect and determined to be in compliance with the Residential Design Guidelines (Exhibit 7). The Consulting Architect commented that the proposed residences are well designed with a style and scale that would fit comfortably in the neighborhood . The Consulting Architect recommended minor changes to both residences' elevations. The applicant has responded to these comments (Exhibit 9) and incorporated the changes into the plans (Exhibit 12). N:\DEV\PC REPORTS\2017\Ke nnedy Ro ad 1 6982 04.12 .17 .docx 4/4/2017 12:21 PM PAGE60F7 SUBJECT : 16982 KENNEDY ROAD/S-16-050 (Lot 8) AND S-16-051 (Lot 9) APRIL 4, 2017 PUBLIC COMMENTS : The applicants informed staff that they have met with a majority of the adjacent neighbors and a letter of neighbor communication is included as Exhibit 10. Written comments from the public have been received and have been included as Exhibit 11 . CONCLUSION : A . Summary The proposed project is in compliance with the Residential Design Guidelines and the Town 's Zoning Ordinance, and is compatible with the immediate neighborhood . B. Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the proposed project. If the deciding body concurs with staff's recommendation it should : 1. Find that the proposed project is Categorically Exempt, pursuant to the adopted Guidelines for the implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act, Section 15303 : New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures (Exhibit 2); 2. As required by Section 29.10.330 of the Town Code for the elimination of a secondary dwelling unit (Exhibit 2); 3. As required by Section 29 .10.09030(e) of the Town Code for the demolition of an existing structure (Exhibit 2); 4. As required by the Residential Design Guidelines that the project complies with the Residential Design Guidelines (Exhibit 2); 5. Make the required cons iderations as required by Section 29 .20.150 of the Town Code for granting approval of an Architecture & Site application (Exhibit 2); and 6. Approve Architecture and Site Applications S-16-050 and S-16-051 with the Recommended Conditions of Approval (Exhibit 3) and development plans (Exhibit 12). C. Alternatives Alternatively, the Commission can: 1. Continue the matter to a date certain with specific direction; or 2. Approve the application(s) with additional and/or modified conditions; or 3. Deny the application(s). N:\DEV\PC REPORTS \2017\Kennedy Road 16982 04.12 .17.docx 4/4/2017 12:2 1 PM PAGE 7 OF 7 SUBJECT: 16982 KENNEDY ROAD/S-16-050 (Lot 8) AND S-16-051 (Lot 9) APRIL 4, 2017 EXHIBITS: 1. Location Maps 2. Findings 3. Recommended Conditions of Approval (12 pages) 4. Project Description, received July 28, 2016 (two pages) 5. Project Data Sheet (four pages) 6 . Historic Preservation Action Minutes (three pages) 7 . Consulting Architect's Report, received August 23, 2016 (seven pages) 8. Consulting Arborist's Report, received August 17, 2016 (37 pages) 9. Applicant's Response to the Consulting Architect and Arborist's Report (seven pages) 10. Neighborhood Communication (one page) 11. Public Comment received by 11:00 a.m., Thursday, April 6, 2017 12. Development Plans, received December 16, 2016 (Lot 8, 16 pages and Lot 9, 17 pages) Distribution: GSJ, LLC, 349 First Street, Suite J, Los Altos CA, 94022 D&C DEVELOPMENT INC., 349 First Street, Suite J, Los Altos CA, 94022 N:\DEV\PC REPORTS\2017\Kennedy Road 16982 04.12.17.docx 4/4/2017 12:21 PM 0 16982 Kennedy Road Lot 8 0 0 .25 -----====:=:::J Miles 0.125 EXHIBIT l This Page Intentionally Left Blank 0 16982 Kennedy Road Lot 9 0 0 .25 ----~::::::======::J Miles 0.125 This Page Intentionally Left Blank PLANNING COMMISSION -Apri/12, 2017 REQUIRED FINDINGS & CONSIDERATIONS FOR: 16982 Kennedy Road Architecture and Site Applications S-16-050 (Lot 8) and S-16-051 (Lot 9) Requesting approval to demolish an existing single-family residence, remove a second dwelling unit, and construct two new single-family residences on property zoned R-1:8. APN 532-35-060. PROPERTY OWNER: GSJ, LLC APPLICANT: D&C Development Inc. FINDINGS Required findings for CEQA: • The project is Categorically Exempt pursuant to the adopted Guidelines for the Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act , Section 15303: New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures. Required finding for the elimination of a secondary dwelling unit without replacement: • As required by Section 29.10.330 of the Town Code for the elimination of a secondary dwelling unit, without replacement, the deciding body shall make the finding that the proposed elimination (without replacement) is consistent with the Town's Housing Element of the General Plan because it would not have a negative impact on the Town's housing stock. In order to eliminate an existing second unit (whether or not it will be replaced), the deciding body must make the demolition findings pursuant to Section 29 .10.09030 outlined below. Required findings for the demolition of an existing structure: • As required by Section 29.10.09030{e) of the Town Code: 1. The Town's housing stock will be maintained as the single-family residence will be replaced with two single-family residences; and the number of approved new secondary dwelling units exceeds the number of approved demolition of existing secondary dwelling units. 2. The existing structures were constructed prior to 1941 and have no historical significance. 3. The property owner does not desire to maintain the structures as they exist. 4. The economic utility of the structures was considered . EXHIBIT 2 Required Compliance with the Residential Design Guidelines: • The project is in compliance with the Re sidential Design Guid eline s for single-family homes not in hillside re sidential area s. CONS IDERATIONS : Considerat ions in review of Architecture & Site applications: • As required by Section 29 .20.150 of the Town Code , the con sideration s in review of an Architecture and Site application were all made in reviewing this project. N :\DEV\FINDI NGS\2017\Kenn edy 16982.doc PLANNING COMMISSION-Apri/12, 2017 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 16982 Kennedy Road Architecture and Site Applications S-16-050 (Lot 8) and S-16-051 (Lot 9) Requesting approval to demolish an existing single-family residence, remove a second dwelling unit, and construct two new single-family residences on property zoned R-1:8. APN 532 -35-060. PROPERTY OWNER: GS), LLC APPLICANT : D&C Development Inc. TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT : Planning Division 1. APPROVAL : This application shall be completed in accordance with all ofthe conditions of approval and in substantial compliance with the approved plans. Any changes or modifications to the approved plans and/or business operation shall be approved by the Community Development Director, DRC or the Planning Commission depending on the scope of the changes. 2. EXPIRATION: The approval will expire two years from the approval date pursuant to Section 29 .20.320 of the Town Code, unless the approval has been vested. 3. OUTDOOR LIGHTING : Exterior lighting shall be kept to a minimum, and shall be down directed fixtures that will not reflect or encroach onto adjacent properties. No flood lights shall be used unless it can be demonstrated that they are needed for safety or security. 4 . ARBORIST REQUIREMENTS: The developer shall implement, at their cost, all recommendations identified in the Arborist's report dated as received August 17, 2016 for the project, on file in the Community Development Department. These recommendations must be incorporated in the building permit plans, and completed prior to issuance of a building permit where applicable. 5. TREE REMOVAL PERMIT : A Tree Removal Permit shall be obtained for any trees to be removed, prior to the issuance of a building or grading permit. 6. REPLACEMENT TREES: New trees shall be planted to mitigate the loss of trees being removed. The number of trees and size of replacement trees shall be determined using the canopy replacement table in the Town Code. New trees shall be double staked with rubber ties and shall be planted prior to final inspection and issuance of occupancy permits. 7. EXISTING TREES : All existing trees shown on the plan and trees required to remain or to be planted are specific subjects of approval ofthis plan, and must remain on the site until a building permit application is submitted and a tree removal permit is obtained. 8. TREE FENCING: Protective tree fencing and other protection measures shall be placed at the drip line of existing trees prior to issuance of demolition and building permits and shall remain through all phases of construction. Include a tree protection plan with the construction plans. EXHIBIT 3 9. FRONT YARD LANDSCAPE: Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy the front yard must be landscaped. 10. WATER EFFECIENCY LANDSCAPE ORDINANCE : The final land scape plan shall meet the Town of Los Gatos Water Conservation Ordinance or the State Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance, whichever is more restrictive . A review fee based on the current fee schedule adopted by the Town Council is required when working landscape and irrigation plans are submitted for review . 11. STORY POLES : The story poles on the project site shall be removed within 30 days of approval of the Architecture & Site application. 12 . TOWN INDEMNITY : Applicants are notified that Town Code Section 1.10.115 require s that any applicant who receives a permit or entitlement from the Town shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the Town and its officials in any action brought by a third party to overturn, set aside, or void the permit or entitlement. Thi s requirement i s a condition of approval of all such permits and entitlements whether or not expre ss ly set forth in the approval, and may be secured to the satisfaction of the Town Attorney. 13 . COMPLIANCE MEMORANDUM : A memorandum shall be prepared and submitted with the building plans detailing how the Condition s of Approval will be addres sed . TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT : Building Division 14. PERMITS REQUIRED : A Demolition Permit shall be required for th e de mol ition of th e existing single -family re sidence, acce ss ory building and second dwelling unit and an individual Building Permit for the con struction of each new sin gle -fam ily resid ence and a separate Building Permit for the detached garage on Lot 8. The se ar e combination Permits which include all required electrical , mechanical, and plumbing work as neces sary. A separate Demolition Permit for the existing single-family r es id e nce, ac cess ory buildin g and second dwelling unit may be i ss ued prior to the Building Permits if so de sired. 15 . CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL : The Conditions of Approval must be blu e-lin ed in full o n the cover sheet of the con struction plan s. A Compliance M emorandum shall be prep ared a nd submitted with the building permit application detailing how the Cond ition s of Approva l will be addre ssed. 16. SIZE OF PLANS: Submit four set s of con struction plan s, minimum si ze 24 " x 3 6", ma ximum size 30 " x 42". 17 . DEMOLITION REQUIREMENTS : Obtain a Building Department Demolitio n Appli ca tio n and a Bay Area Air Quality Mana gement Di strict Application from the Bu i ldin g Departm ent Service Counter. Once the d emolition form ha s been completed , all sig nature s obtain ed and w ritten verification from PG &E that all utilities have been disc onn ect ed, return th e completed form to the Building Department Servic e Counte r alon g with th e Air Di strict 's J# Certificate, PG&E verification, and three (3) sets of site plan s showin g all ex ist i ng structures, exi sting utility servi ce lines such as water, sewer, and PG&E. No d e m o liti o n work shall be done without first obtainin g a pe rmit from the Town. 18. SOILS REPORT : A Soil s Report (G eotec hnical Investigation), prepared to th e sa tisf action of th e Building Official, containin g found ation and retainin g wall de sig n re co mmend at ion s, shall be submitted with the Building Permit Application . This report shall be prepared by a licensed Civil Engineer specializing in soils mechanics . 19. SHORING : Shoring plans and calculations will be required for all excavations which exceed four (4) feet in depth or which remove lateral support from any ex isting buildings, adjacent Property, or the public right-of-way. Shoring plans and calculations shall be prepared by a California licensed Engineer and shall conform to Cai/OSHA regulations. 20 . FOUNDATION INSPEC TIONS : A pad certificate prepared by a licensed Civil Engineer or Land Surveyor shall be submitted to the project Building Inspector at the foundation i nspection . This certificate shall certify compliance with the recommendations as specified in the Soils Report and that the building pad elevat ions and on-site retain ing wall locations and elevations have been prepared accord i ng to the approved plans. Horizontal and vertical controls shall be set and certified by a licensed surveyor or registered Civil Engineer for the following items: a. Building pad elevations b . Fini sh floor elevations c. Foundation corner locations 21 . TOWN RESIDENTIAL ACCESSIBILITY STANDARDS : New residential un its shall be designed with adaptability features for single-family residences per Town Resolution 1994-61 : a. Wood backing (2 "x 8" minimum) shall be provided in all bathroom walls, at water clo sets, showers, and bathtubs, located 34 inches from the floor to the center of the backing, suitable fo r the installation of grab bars when needed in the future . b . All passage doors shall be at least 32 inch doors on the accessible floor level. c. The primary entrance door shall be a 36 inch wide door including a 5' x 5' level landing, no more than 1 inch out of plane with the immediate interior floor level and with an 18 inch clearance at the interior strike edge . d . A door buzzer, bell or chime shall be hard wired at the primary entrance. 22. TITLE 24 ENERGY COMPLIANCE: All required California Title 24 Energy Compliance Form s must be blue -l ined (st i cky-backedL i.e. directly printed, onto a sheet ofthe plans. 23 . BACKWATER VALVE: The scope of this project may require the installation of a sanitary sewer backwater valve per Town Ordinance 6.50.025 . Please provide information on the plans if a backwater valve is required and the location of the installation. The Town of Los Gatos Ordinance and West Valley Sanitation District (WVSD) requires backwater valves on drainage p i ping serving fixtures that have flood level r i ms less than 12 inches above the elevation of the next upstream manhole . 24. TOWN FIREPLACE STANDARDS : New wood burning fireplaces shall be an EPA Phase II appliance or gas appliance per Town Ordinance 1905. Tree limbs shall be cut within 10 feet of chimneys. 25. HAZARDOUS FIRE ZONE: Thi s project will require Class A Roof Assemblies . 26 . SPECIAL INSPECTIONS: When a special inspect ion is required by CBC Section 1704, the Architect or Engineer of Record shall prepare an inspection program that shall be submitted to the Building Official for approval prior to issuance of the Building Permit. The Town Special Inspection form must be completely filled-out and signed by all requested parties prior to permit is suance . Special Inspection forms are available from the Building Division Service Counter or onl ine at www.lo sgatosc a.gov /building 27. BLUE PRINT FOR A CLEAN BAY SHEET: The Town standard Santa Clara County Valley Non point Source Pollution Control Program Sheet (24"x36") shall be part of the plan submittal as the second page. The specification sheet is available at the Building Division Service Counter for a fee of $2 or at ARC Blue Print for a fee or online at www .losgatosca.gov/building 28. APPROVALS REQUIRED: The project requires the following departments and agencies approval before issuing a Building Permit : a. Community Development-Planning Division: (408) 354-6874 b. Engineering/Parks & Public Works Department: (408) 399-5771 c. Santa Clara County Fire Department: (408) 378-4010 d. West Valley Sanitation District: (408) 378-2407 e. Local School District: The Town will forward the paperwork to the appropriate school district(s) for processing. A copy of the paid receipt is required prior to permit issuance. f. Bay Area Air Quality Management District: (415) 771-6000 TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE DIRECTOR OF PARKS AND PUBLIC WORKS : Engineering Division 29. GENERAL: All public improvements shall be made according to the latest adopted Town Standard Plans, Standard Specifications and Engineering Design Standards. All work shall conform to the applicable Town ordinances. The adjacent public right-of-way shall be kept clear of all job-related mud, silt, concrete, dirt and other construction debris at the end of the day. Dirt and debris shall not be washed into storm drainage facilities. The storing of goods and materials on the sidewalk and/or the street will not be allowed unless an encroachment permit is issued by the Engineering Division of the Parks and Public Works Department. The Developer's representative in charge shall be at the job site during all working hours. Failure to maintain the public right-of-way according to this condition may result in the issuance of correction notices, citations, or stop work orders and the Town performing the required maintenance at the Developer's expense. 30. APPROVAL: This application shall be completed in accordance with all of the conditions of approval listed below and in substantial compliance with the latest reviewed and approved development plans. Any changes or modifications to the approved plans or conditions of approvals shall be approved by the Town Engineer. 31. ENCROACHMENT PERMIT: All work in the public right-of-way will require a Construction Encroachment Permit. All work over $5,000 will require construction security. It is the responsibility of the Developer to obtain any necessary encroachment permits from affected agencies and private parties, including but not limited to, Pacific Gas and Electric (PG&E), AT&T, Comcast, Santa Clara Valley Water District, California Department of Transportation (Caltrans). Copies of any approvals or permits must be submitted to the Town Engineering Division of the Parks and Public Works Department prior to releasing any permit. 32. GENERAL LIABILITY INSURANCE : The property owner shall provide proof of insurance to the Town on a yearly basis . In addition to general coverage , the policy must cover all el ements encroaching into the Town's right-of-way . 33. PUBLIC WORKS INSPECTIONS : The Developer or their representat ive shall notify the Engineering Inspector at lea st twenty-four (24) hours before starting any work pertaining to on-site drainage facilitie s, grading or paving, and all wor k in the Town's right-of-way. Failure to do so will result in penalties and rejection of work that went on without in spection . 34 . RESTORATION OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS : The Developer shall repair or replace all exi sting improvements not de si gnated for removal that are damaged or removed because of the Developer's operation s. Improvements such as, but not l i mited to: curbs, gutters, sidewal ks , driveways, signs, pavements, rai sed pavement markers, thermopla stic pavement markings, etc., shall be repaired and replaced to a condition equal to or better than the original condition. Any new concrete shall be free of stamps, logos, name s, graffiti, etc . Any concrete identified that is displaying a stamp or equal shall be removed and replaced at the Contractor's sole expen se and no additional compensation shall be allowed therefore . Existing improvement to be r epaired or replaced shall be at the direction of the Engineering Construction In spector, and shall comply with all Title 24 Di sabled Acces s provision s. The Developer shall request a walk-through with the Engineering Construction In spector before the start of construct ion to verify existing conditions. 35 . SITE SUPERVISION : The General Contractor shall provide qualified supervision on the job site at all times during construction . 36. STREET CLOSURE : Any proposed blockage or partial closure of the street requires an encroachment permit. Special provisions such as limitation s on works hours, protective enclosures, or other means to facilitate public access in a safe manner may be required. 37 . PLAN CHECK FEES: Plan check fees shall be deposited with the Town prior to plan review at the Engineering Division of the Parks and Public Works Department. 38. INSPECTION FEES: In spection fees shall be deposited with the Town prior to the i ss uance of any permits. 39 . PLANS AND STUDIES : All required plans and studies shall be prepa r ed by a Registered Profes sional Engineer in the State of California, and submitted to the Town Engineer for review and approval. Additionally, any post-project traffic or parking counts, or other studie s imposed by Planning Commission or Town Council shall be funded by the Applicant. 40. DRIVEWAY : The driveway conform to existin g pavement on Kennedy Road shall be con structed in a manner such that the existing drainage patterns will not be obstructed . 41. DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENT : Prior to the issuance of any grading/improvement permits, whichever comes first, the Applicant shall : a) design provisions for surface drainage; and b) de sign all necessary storm drain facilitie s extending to a satisfactory point of disposal for the proper control and di spo sal of storm runoff; and c ) provide a r ecorded copy of any required ea sements to the Town . 42 . TREE REMOVAL : Copie s of all necessary tree removal permits shall be provided prior to the iss uance of a building permit. 43. SURVEYING CONTROLS : Horizontal and vertical controls shall be set and certified by a licensed surveyor or registered civil engineer qualified to practice land surveying, for the top of retaining wall elevations and locations. 44 . PAD CERTIFICATION: A letter from a licensed land surveyor shall be provided stating that the building foundation was constructed in accordance with the approved plans shall be provided subsequent to foundation construction and prior to construction on the structure. The pad certification shall address both vertical and horizontal foundation placement. 45 . PRECONSTRUCTION MEETING: Prior to issuance of any permit or the commencement of any site work, the general contractor shall : a. Along with the project applicant, attend a pre-construction meeting with the Town Engineer to discuss the project conditions of approval, working hours, site maintenance and other construction matters; b. Acknowledge in writing that they have read and understand the project conditions of approval and will make certain that all project sub-contractors have read and understand them as well prior to commencing any work, and that a copy of the project conditions of approval will be posted on-site at all times during construction. 46. RETAINING WALLS: A building permit, issued by the Building Department at 110 E. Main Street, may be required for site retaining walls . Walls are not reviewed or approved by the Engineering Division of Parks and Public Works during the grading permit plan review process. 47. WEST VALLEY SANITATION DISTRICT: All sewer connection and treatment plant capacity fees shall be paid either immediately prior to the issuance of a sewer connection permit, or whichever event occurs first . 48 . SOILS REPORT: One copy ofthe soils and geologic report shall be submitted with the application . The soils report shall include specific criteria and standards governing site grading, drainage, pavement design, retaining wall design, and erosion control. The reports shall be signed and "wet stamped" by the engineer or geologist, in conformance with Section 6735 of the California Business and Professions Code. 49. SOILS ENGINEER CONSTRUCTION OBSERVATION: During construction, all excavations and grading shall be inspected by the Applicant's soils engineer prior to placement of concrete and/or backfill so they can verify that the actual conditions are as anticipated in the design-level geotechnical report, and recommend appropriate changes in the recommendations contained in the report, if nece ss ary. The results of the con struction observation and testing shall be documented in an "as-built" letter/report prepared by the Applicant's soil s engineer and submitted to the Town before final release of any occupancy permit is granted. 50. SOIL RECOMMENDATIONS: The project shall incorporate the geotechnical/geological recommendations contained in the Geotechnical Investigation by Silicon Valley Soil Engineering, dated June 2016, and any subsequently required report or addendum. Subsequent reports or addendum are subject to peer review by the Town's consultant and costs shall be borne by the Applicant. 51. WATER DESIGN: Water plans prepared by San Jose Water Company must be reviewed and approved prior to issuance of any permit. 52. FRONTAGE IMPROVEMENTS: The Applicant shall be required to improve the project's public frontage to current Town Standards. The se improvements may include but not limited to curb, gutter, sidewalk, driveway approach(es), etc. The improvements must be completed and accepted by the Town before a Certificate of Occupancy for any new building can be issued . 53. UTILITIES : The Developer shall install all new, relocated, or temporarily removed utility service s, including telephone, electric power and all other communications lines underground, as required by Town Code Section 27.50.015(b). All new utility services shall be placed underground . Underground conduit shall be provided for cable television service . The Applicant is required to obtain approval of all proposed utility alignments from any and all utility service providers before a Certificate of Occupancy for any new building can be issued. The Town of Lo s Gato s does not approve or imply approval for final alignment or design of these facilities. 54. UTILITY SETBACKS : House foundations shall be set back from utility lines a sufficient distance to allow excavation of the utility without undermining the house foundation. The Town Engineer shall determine the appropriate setback based on the depth of the utility, input from the project soils engineer, and the type of foundation . 55. TRENCHING MORATORIUM : Trenching within a newly paved street will be allowed subject to the following requirements: a. The Town standard "T" trench detail shall be used. b . A Town-approved colored controlled density backfill shall be used. c. All necessary utility trenches and related pavement cuts shall be consolidated to minimize the impacted area of the roadway. d. The total asphalt thickness shall be a minimum of three (3) inches, meet Town standards, or shall match the existing thickness, whichever is greater. The final lift shall be 1.5-inches of one -half (~) inch medium asphalt . The initial lift(s) shall be of three-quarter (%) inch medium asphalt. e. The Contractor shall schedule a pre-paving meeting with the Town Engineering Construction Inspector the day the paving is to take place . f . A slurry seal topping may be required by the construction inspector depending their assessment of the quality of the trench paving. If required , the slurry seal shall extend the full width of the street and shall extend five (5) feet beyond the longitudinal limits of trenching. Slurry seal materials shall be approved by the Town Engineering Construction Inspector prior to placement. Black sand may be required in the slurry mix. All exist i ng striping and pavement markings shall be replaced upon completion of slurry seal operations. All pavement re storations shall be completed and approved by the In spector before occupancy. 56. SIDEWALK/CURB IN-LIEU FEE : A curb and sidewalk in-lieu fee of $16,146 shall be paid prior to is suance of a building permit. This fee is based on a 117 LF of curb at $66/LF and 526.5 square feet of 4.?-foot wide sidewalk at $16/SF in accordance with Town policy and the Town's Fee Schedule . 57 . DRIVEWAY APPROACH: The Developer shall install 2 (two) Town standard reside ntial driveway approaches. The new driveway approaches shall be constructed per Town Standard Plans and must be completed and accepted by the Town before a Certificate of Occupancy for any new building can be issued. New concrete shall be free of stamps, logos, names, graffiti, etc. Any concrete identified that is displaying a stamp or equal shall be removed and replaced at the Contractor's sole expense and no additional compensation shall be allowed therefore. 58. FENCING: Any fencing proposed within two hundred (200) feet of an intersection shall comply with Town Code Section §23.10.080. 59. SIGHT TRIANGLE AND TRAFFIC VIEW AREA : Any proposed improvements, including but not limiting to trees and hedges, will need to abide by Town Code Sections 23.10.080, 26 .10.065, and 29.40.030. 60. FENCES: Fences between all adjacent parcels will need to be located on the property lines/boundary lines. Any existing fences that encroach into the neighbor's property will need to be removed and replaced to the correct location of the boundary lines before a Certificate of Occupancy for any new building can be issued. Waiver of this condition will require signed and notarized letters from all affected neighbors. 61. TRAFFIC IMPACT MITIGATION FEE: The Developer shall pay the project's proportional share of transportation improvements needed to serve cumulative development within the Town of los Gatos. This fee in the amount of $8,368.08 shall be paid before issuance of a building permit. The final traffic impact mitigation fee for this project shall be calculated from the final plans using the current fee schedule and rate schedule in effect at the time the building permit is issued, using a comparison between the existing and proposed uses. 62. CONSTRUCTION STREET PARKING: No vehicle having a manufacture's rated gros s vehicle weight exceeding ten thousand (10,000) pounds shall be allowed to park on the portion of a street which abuts property in a residential zone without prior to approval from the Town Engineer. 63. TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN : A traffic control plan is required and must be submitted and approved prior to any work in the public right-of-way. This plan shall include, but not be limited to, the following measures: a. Construction activities shall be strategically timed and coordinated to minimize traffic disruption for schools, residents, businesses, special events, and other projects in the area. The schools located on the haul route shall be contacted to help with the coordination of the trucking operation to minimize traffic disruption. b. Flag persons shall be placed at locations necessary to control one-way traffic flow. All flag person s shall have the capability of communicating with each other to coordinate the operation. c. Prior to construction, advance notification of all affected residents and emergency services shall be made regarding one-way operation, specifying dates and hours of operation. 64. HAULING OF SOIL: Hauling of soil on-or off-site shall not occur during the morning or evening peak periods (between 7:00a .m. and 9:00a.m. and between 4:00p.m. and 6:00 p.m.), and at other times as specified by the Director of Parks and Public Works . Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the Developer shall work with the Town Building Department and Engineering Division Inspectors to devise a traffic control plan to ensure safe and efficient traffic flow under periods when soil is hauled on or off of the project site. This may include, but is not limited to provisions for the Developer/Owner to place construction notification signs noting the dates and time of construction and hauling activities, or providing additional traffic control. Coordination with other significant projects in the area may also be required . Cover all trucks hauling soil, sand and other loose debris . 65. CONSTRUCTION HOURS: All subdivision improvements and site improvements construction activities, including the delivery of construction materials, labors, heavy equipment, supplies, etc., shall be limited to the hours of 8:00a.m. to 8:00p.m., weekdays and 9:00a.m. to 7:00 p.m. weekends and holidays. The Town may authorize, on a case -by-case basis, alternate construction hours. The Applicant shall provide written notice twenty-four (24) hours in advance of modified construction hours. Approval of this request is at discretion of the Town. 66. CONSTRUCTION NOISE: Between the hours of 8 :00a.m. to 8:00p.m., weekdays and 9:00a .m. to 7:00p.m. weekends and holidays, construction , alteration or repair activities shall be allowed. No individual piece of equipment shall produce a noise level exceeding eighty-five (85) dBA at twenty-five (25) feet from the source. If the device is located within a structure on the property, the measurement shall be made at distances as close to twenty-five (25) feet from the device as possible. The noise level at any point outside of the property plane shall not exceed eighty-five (85) dBA. 67 . CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT PLAN SHEET: Prior to the issuance of any permits, the Applicant shall submit a construction management plan sheet (full-size) within the plan set that shall incorporate at a minimum the Earth Movement Plan, Traffic Control Plan, Project Schedule, site security fencing, employee parking, construction staging area, materials storage area(s), concrete washout(s) and proposed outhouse location(s). 68. WVSD (West Valley Sanitation District): New sanitary sewer laterals are televised by West Valley Sanitation District and approved by the Town of Los Gatos before they are used. A Sanitary Sewer Clean-out is required for each property at the property line, or at a location specified by the Town. 69. SANITARY SEWER BACKWATER VALVE: Drainage piping serving fixtures which have flood level rims less than twelve (12) inches (304.8 mm) above the elevation of the next upstream manhole and/or flushing inlet cover at the public or private sewer system serving such drainage piping shall be protected from backflow of sewage by installing an approved type backwater valve. Fixtures above such elevation shall not discharge through the backwater valve, unless first approved by the Building Official. The Town shall not incur any liability or responsibility for damage resulting from a sewer overflow where the property owner or other person has failed to install a backwater valve as defined in the Uniform Plumbing Code adopted by the Town and maintain such device in a functional operation condition. Evidence of West Sanitation District's decision on whether a backwater device is needed shall be provided prior to the issuance of a building permit. 70. BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES (BMPs): The Applicant is responsible for ensuring that all contractors are aware of all storm water quality measures and that such measures are implemented. Best Management Practices (BMPs) shall be maintained and be placed for all areas that have been graded or disturbed and for all material, equipment and/or operations that need protection. Removal of BMPs (temporary removal during construction activities) shall be replaced at the end of each working day. Failure to comply with the construction BMP will result in the issuance of correction notices, citations, or stop work orders. 71. SITE DESIGN MEASURES: All projects shall incorporate the following measures: Protect sensitive areas and minimize changes to the natural topography. a. Minimize impervious surface areas. b. Direct roof downspouts to vegetated areas . c. Use permeable pavement surfaces on the driveway, at a minimum. d. Use landscaping to treat stormwater. 72. EROSION CONTROL : Interim and final erosion control plans shall be prepared and submitted to the Engineering Division of the Parks and Public Works Department. A maximum of two (2) weeks is allowed between clearing of an area and stabilizing/building on an area if grading is allowed during the rainy season. Interim erosion control measures, to be carried out during construction and before installation of the final landscaping, shall be included. Interim erosion control method shall include, but are not limited to: silt fences , fiber rolls (with locations and details), erosion control blankets, Town standard seeding specification, filter berms, check dams, retention basins, etc. Provide erosion control measures as needed to protect downstream water quality during winter months. The Town of Los Gatos Engineering Division of the Parks and Public Works Department and the Building Department will conduct periodic NPDES inspections of the site throughout the recognized storm season to verify compliance with the Construction General Permit and Stormwater ordinances and regulations . 73 . DUST CONTROL: Blowing dust shall be reduced by timing construction activities so that paving and building construction begin as soon as possible after completion of grading, and by landscaping disturbed soils as soon as possible. Further, water trucks shall be present and in use at the construction site. All portions of the site subject to blowing dust shall be watered as often as deemed necessary by the Town, or a minimum of three (3) times daily, or apply (non-toxic) soil stabilizers on all unpaved access roads, parking areas, and staging areas at construction sites in order to insure proper control of blowing dust for the duration of the project. Watering on public streets shall not occur. Streets shall be cleaned by street sweepers or by hand as often as deemed necessary by the Town Engineer, or at least once a day. Watering associated with on-site construction activity shall take place between the hours of 8 a.m. and 5 p.m. and shall include at least one (1) late-afternoon watering to minimize the effects of blowing du st. All public streets soiled or littered due to this construction activity shall be cleaned and swept on a daily basis during the workweek to the satisfaction of the Town. Demolition or earthwork activities shall be halted when wind speeds (instantaneous gusts) exceed twenty-five (25) miles per hour (MPH). All trucks hauling soil, sand, or other loose debris shall be covered. 74. CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES: All construction shall conform to the latest requirements of the CASQA Stormwater Best Management Practices Handbooks for Con struction Activities and New Development and Redevelopment, the Town's grading and erosion control ordinance, and other generally accepted engineering practices for erosion control as required by the Town Engineer when undertaking construction activities. 75. SITE DRAINAGE: Rainwater leaders shall be discharged to splash blocks. No through curb drains will be allowed . Any storm drain inlets (public or private) directly connected to public storm system shall be stenciled/signed with appropriate "NO DUMPING-Flows to Bay" NPDES required language. On -site drainage systems for all projects shall include one of the alternatives included in section C.3 .i of the Municipal Regional NPDES Permit. These include storm water reuse via cisterns or rain barrels, directing runoff from impervious surfaces to vegetated areas and use of permeable surfaces . If dry wells are to be used they shall be placed a minimum of ten (10) feet from the adjacent property line and/or right-of-way. No improvements shall obstruct or divert runoff to the detriment of an adjacent, downstream or down slope property. 76. OFF-SITE DRAINAGE : The Developer shall construct and install a private on-site storm drain system that is adequately sized to collect and convey adjacent off-site tributary drainage. Hydraulic calculations for a 100-year storm event sha ll provide documentation that the proposed storm drain system can convey said off-site drainage as well as on-site drainage during this event over, within, through and off the site, and ultimately into the Town's storm drain system. 77 . SILT AND MUD IN PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY: It is the responsibility of Contractor and homeowner to make sure that all dirt tracked into the public right-of-way is cleaned up on a daily basis. Mud, silt, concrete and other construction debris SHALL NOT be wa shed into the Town 's storm drains . 78. GOOD HOUSEKEEPING: Good housekeeping practices shall be observed at all times during the course of construction. All construction shall be diligently supervised by a person or persons authorized to do so at all times during working hours. The Developer's repre sentative in charge shall be at the job site during all working hours. Failure to maintain the public right-of-way according to this condition may result in penalties and/or the Town performing the required maintenance at the Developer's expense . 79. COVERED TRUCKS: All trucks transporting materials to and from the site shall be covered. TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE SANTA CLARA COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT: 80. FIRE SPRINKLERS : An automatic residential fire-sprinkler system shall be installed in one- and two-family dwellings as follows. In all new one-and two-family dwellings and in exi sting one-and two-family dwellings when additions are made that increase the building area to more than 3,600 square feet . Exception: A one-time addition to an existing building that does not total more than 1,000 square feet of building area. Note: The owner(s), occupant(s) and any contractor(s) or subcontractor(s) are responsible for con sulting with the water purveyor of record in order to determine if any modification or upgrade of ~he exi sting water service is required. Note: Covered porches, patios, balconies, and attic spaces may require fire sprinkler coverage . A State of California licen sed (C-16) Fire Protection Contractor shall submit plan s, calculations, a completed permit application and appropriate fees to this department for review and approval prior to beginning their work. CRC Sec . 313.2 as adopted and amended by LGTC 81. WATER SUPPLY REQUIREMENTS: Potable water supplies shall be protected from contamination caused by fire protection water supplies. It is the responsibility of the applicant and any contractors and subcontractors to contact the water purveyor supplying the site of such project, and to comply with the requirements of that purveyor. Such requirements shall be incorporated into the design of any water-based fire protection systems, and/or fire suppression water supply systems or storage containers that may be physically connected in any manner to an appliance capable of causing contamination of the potable water supply of the purveyor of record. Final approval of the system(s) under consideration will not be granted by this office until compliance with the requirements of the water purveyor of record are documented by that purveyor as having been met by the applicant(s). 2010 CFC Sec. 903.3.5 and Health and Safety Code 13114.7. 82. TIMING OF REQUIRED WATER SUPPLY AND ACCESS INSTALLATION : Installations of required fire service(s) and fire hydrant(s) shall be tested and accepted by the Fire Department, prior to the start of framing or delivery of bulk combustible materials. Building permit issuance may be withheld until required installations are completed, tested, and accepted . CFC Sec . 501 83 . CONSTRUCTION SITE FIRE SAFETY : All construction sites must comply with applicable provisions of the CFC Chapter 33 and our Standard Detail and Specification Sl-7. Provide appropriate notations on subsequent plan submittals, as appropriate to the project. CFC Chp 33. 84. ADDRESS INDENTIFICATION: New and existing buildings shall have approved address numbers, building numbers, or approved building identification placed in a posi tion that is plainly legible and visible from the street or road fronting the property. These numbers shall contrast with their background . Where required by the fire code official, address numbers shall be provided in additional approved locations to facilitate emergency response. Address numbers shall be Arabic numbers or alphabetical letters. Numbers shall be a minimum of 4 inches (101.6 mm) high with a minimum stroke width of 0 .5 inch (12.7 mm). Where acces s is by means of a private road and the building cannot be viewed from the public way, a monument, pole o r other sign or means shall be used to identify the structure. Addres s numbers shall be maintained. CFC Sec . 505.1. N:\DEV\CONDITIONS\2017\Kennedy Rd 16982.docx Project Description Lot 8 16982 Kennedy Rd., Los Gatos GSJ , LLC is submitting an application for Design Review Approval of two s ingle family detached homes. One home currently exists on the site, which will be subdivided into two parcels. This existing house, at 16982 Kennedy Rd., will be removed during development of the parcel. This Project Description is relative to the proposed residence for Lot 8, wh ich is the lot on the east side of the now subdivided original parcel. The project is an infill development of an existing parcel of approximately 13,792 sq . ft. in size, located in an R1-8 zone and situated on the south facing side of Kennedy Rd. between Los Gatos Blvd . and Ferris Ave. The parcel will be divided into two single family residential lots running side by side that are directly accessed by driveway inlets from Kennedy Rd. Lot 8: 7 ,340 sq. ft. lot size . The house has a total of 2 ,018 sq . ft ., on a one-story above-grade main level, containing 2 bedrooms and 2 Yz baths. There is a sub- grade finished cellar containing 1 ,427 sq. ft. of 2 additional bedrooms, 2 baths, and a walk-out patio . There is also a detached 427 sq. ft. 2-car garage. The arch itectural style can be described as California Bungalow, and is defined by cascading 5: 12 gable roofs along the front and rear elevations, with a main body 2 :12 gable roof. The upper portion of the roof gables are accented with board & batten accent siding with prominent ornamental wood corbels for added architectural detail and interest. The highest roof ridge of the dwelling, at 18'-9 Yz " (measured above finish grade height of 396. 7) falls well within the maximum allowable building height of 30'. (The same ridge height when measured from the existing grade height of 395.87' is 19'-7 1/2"). The roofing material is asphalt composition shingles, and the exterior walls are finished in stucco siding with painted white wood trim in warm gray and earth tones, and traditionally styled windows are featured in keeping with the architectural style. Architectural grade trim is also used at the chimney cap for a detailed appearance. In addition, the building massing and color is varied with the use of a projecting battered wainscoat at varied heights along the front and side elevations of the dwelling . An architectural grade garage door with upper panel glazing is used to keep the garage elevation in context with the overall architectural style of the dwelling. All yards for this lot will be fully landscaped and irrigated , and back and side yards will be enclosed by wood privacy fences. :EXHIBIT 4 This Page Intentionally Left Blank Project Description Lot9 16982 Kennedy Rd., Los Gatos GSJ , LLC is submitting an application for Design Review Approval of two single family detached homes. One home currently exists on the site , which will be subdivided into two parcels . This existing house, at 16982 Kennedy Rd., will be removed during development of the parcel. This Project Description is relative to one of the proposed residences, in this case for Lot 9, which is the lot on the west side of the subdivided original parcel. The project is an infill development of an existing parcel of approximately 13 ,792 sq . ft. in size, located in an R1 -8 zone and situated on the south facing side of Kennedy Rd . between Los Gatos Blvd . and Ferris Ave. The parcel will be divided into two single family residential lots running side by side that are directly accessed by driveway inlets from Kennedy Rd. Lot 9: 6 ,452 sq. ft. lot size . The house has a total of 2,169 sq. ft., containing 2 bedrooms and 2 ~ baths on two-stories above grade. There is a sub-grade finished cellar containing 1 ,297 sq. ft. of 2 additional bedrooms, 2 baths, and a walkout patio. There is also an attached 2-car garage 420 sq. ft. in size. The architectural style can be described as Craftsman Shingle Style, and features a broad 5:12 sloping roof on the front elevation, terminated at the porch and garage eave with exposed rafters. There is a combination of 4 :12 and 5:12 gable roofs along the side elevations, with a single 2 ~: 12 pitched roof added for increased variety. The upper portion of the roof gables are accented with board & batten accent siding, wide wood trim , and prominent ornamental wood corbels for architectural detail and interest. Single story spaces have low roofs and projecting 2 nd story walls are used to break the side and rear elevations of the building down into a variety of smaller planes and masses. The highest roof ridge of the dwelling , at 24'-5" (measured above finish grade height of 396.9 ') falls well within the maximum allowable building height of 30'. (The same ridge height when measured from the existing grade height of 396.1' is 25'-2 1/2"). The roofing material is asphalt composition shingles, and the exterior walls are finished in shingle style siding with painted white wood trim in warm brown tones, and traditionally styled windows are featured in keeping with the architectural style . In addition, a complementary color stone veneer base is used at porch columns and at the side of the garage door, and a white painted wood Craftsman style rail and slightly sloping column casings are used at the front porch. Also in keeping with a Craftsman architectural character, Lot 9 's front (street) elevation utilizes an architectural grade garage door with glazed upper panels. All yards for this lot will be fully landscaped and irrigated, and back and side yards will be enclosed by wood privacy fences. This Page Intentionally Left Blank 16982 Kennedy Road Lot 8-PROJECT DATA I• EXISTING PROPOSED REQUIRED/ CONDITIONS PROJECT PERMITTED Zoning district R1-8 R1-8 - Land use Vacant - (existing dwelling t.b. Single Family Residential demo ' d) General Plan Low Density Residential Low Density Residential - Designation Lot size {sq. ft.) 13,792 sq . ft. Lot 8: 7,340 sq . ft. • gross lot area sq. ft. minimum Exterior materials: • siding N/A stucco w/ board & batten - gable end treatment • trim N/A wood - • windows N/A vinyl clad wood - • roofing N/A asphalt composition - shingles Building floor area: • first floor N/A 2,018 sq. ft. - • second floor N/A N/A - • garage N/A 427 sq. ft. - • cellar N/A 1427 sq. ft. - Setbacks {ft.): • front N/A 25 '-0" 25 feet minimum • rear N/A 26'-3" 20 feet minimum • side N/A 8 ' (left side yard) 8 feet minimum 15'-5" (right side yard) 3'-2" (right side yard @ garage) N/A 1% back to front Average slope {%) less than 1% side to side - Maximum height {ft.) N/A 18'-9 W' 30 feet maximum Building coverage (%) 1,688/7,340 sq. ft. 2,685/7,340 (sq . ft.) 40% = 22.9% = 36.5% EXHIBIT 5 Impervious coverage 2,525/7,340 sq. ft. 4 ,134/7,340 sq . ft. no max imum (%) = 34.4% = 56.3% Parking • garage spaces NJA 2 • uncovered spaces N/A 2 (@ driveway) Sewer or septic sewer sewer - 16982 Kennedy Road Lot 9-PROJECT DATA EXISTING PROPOSED REQUIRED/ CONDITIONS PROJECT PERMITTED Zoning district R-1 :8 R-1 :8 - Land use Vacant - (existing dwe lling t.b . Single Family Residential demo'd) General Plan Low Density Residential Low Density Residential - Designation Lot size (sq. ft.) • gross lot area 13,792 sq . ft . Lot 9: 6,452 sq. ft . sq . ft . minimum Exterior materials: • siding N/A wood shingle w/ board & -batten gable end treatment I stone veneer @column bases • trim N/A wood - • windows N/A vinyl clad wood - • roofing N/A asphalt composition - shingles Building floor area: • first floor N/A 1 ,607 sq . ft . - • second floor N/A 562 sq. ft. - • garage N/A 420 sq. ft . - • cellar N/A 1,297 sq . ft. - Setbacks (ft.): • front N/A 25'-0" 25 feet minimum N/A 20 '-0" 20 feet minimum • rear • side N/A 8 '-0" (both sides) 8 fe et minimum Average slope (%) N/A less than 1% (b ack to fro nt) less than 1% (side to side) - Maximum height (ft.) N/A 24'-S " 30 feet maximum Building coverage (%) 1,482/6,45 2 (s q . ft.) 2,685 /6,452 (sq . ft .) 40% = 22.9% = 35.7% Impervious coverage 2,525/6,452 (sq. ft .) 4,134/6,452 (sq. ft.) no ma ximum (%) = 54.1% = 56.5% Parking • garage spaces N/A 2 • uncovered spaces N/A 2 (@ driveway) Sewer or septic sewer sewer - TOWN OF LOS GATOS 110 East Main Street, Los Gatos, CA 95030 (408) 354-6874 SUMMARY MINUTES OF SPECIAL MEETING OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATI ON COMMI TTEE OF THE TOWN OF LOS GATOS FOR MAY 11, 2016 HELD IN THE TOWN COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 110 E MAIN STREET, LOS GATOS, CALIFORNIA. The meeting was called to order at 4:03P.M. by Chair Bob Cowan. ATT ENDANCE Members Present: Bob Cowan, Kathryn Janoff, Len Pacheco, Michael Kane Members Absent: Tom O 'Donnell Staff Present: Marni Moseley, Associate Planner Sylvie Roussel , Administrative Assistant VERBAL COMMUNICATIONS-NONE 1. Approval of Minutes • April 27 , 2016 MOTION: Len Pacheco moved to approve the minutes of April27 , 2016. The motion was seconded by Kathryn Janoff and approved 4-0-1 , Tom O 'Donnell absent. 2. 135 Johnson Avenue Minor Residential Development Permit MR-16-005 Requesting approval for an addition greater than 100 square feet to an ex isting second story on property zoned R-1 :8. APN 532-29-010. PROPERTY OWNER/ APPLICANT: Lisa Niva PROJECT PLANNER: Marni Moseley Continuedfrom April 2 7, 2016 Bob Cowan stated that the proposed windows are inconsistent with the exi sting windows . Kathryn Janoff commented that the proposed addition would not match th e Victorian style of the house. MOTI ON: Michae l Kane moved to recommend approval of the application subject to the applicant working with staff to addres s the following recommendations : French doors should be used rather than sliding doors , double hung windows should be used , and the addition should match the form and materials of the exi sting Victorian architecture . The motion was seconded by L en Pacheco and appr oved 4-0-l. EXlilBIT 6 Historic Preservation Committee May 11,2016 Page 2 of3 3. 16982 Kennedy Road Requesting approval to remove a pre-1941 property from the Historic Resources Inventory for property zoned R-1 :8 . APN 532-35-060. PROPERTY OWNER: Rhonda Jeffrey APPLICANT: D and C Development PROJECT PLANNER: Marni Moseley Continued from Apri/27, 2016 The applicant's Architectural Historian, stated that the property had so many alterations that there was no evidence of anything pre-1941 . Some of the changes were even post-1975. Bob Cowan and Len Pacheco commented that most ofthe house was post-1941 design and there was nothing to prove that the house was built pre-1941. Kathryn Jano.ffstated she could only find evidence as early as 1944. MOTION: Michael Kan e moved to approve the request to remove the property from the Historic Resources Inventory List. The motion was seconded by Len Pacheco and approved 4-0-1. 4. 112 Los Gatos Boulevard Requesting approval to remove irreparable siding on property zoned R-1 D. APN 532-29-101. PROPERTY OWNER: Randolph Ditzler APPLICANT: David Zicovich PROJECT PLANNER : Marni Moseley Marni Moseley, Associate Planner, informed the committee that the Town's Building Official has confirmed that the siding is irreparable and recommends replacement in kind. MOTION: Michael Kane moved to approve the request to remove the irreparable siding. The motion was seconded by Len Pacheco and approved 4-0-1 . 5. 125 Wheeler A venue Requesting approval to remove a pre-1941 property from the Historic Resources Inventory for property zoned R-1 :8 . APN 532-36-065. PROPERTY OWNER: Jeffery Avilla APPLICANT: Tony Jeans PROJECT PLANNER: Mami Moseley Historic Preservation Committee Mayll ,2016 Page 3 of3 The committee discussed how the pre-I 94 I look of the house was no longer visible and architectural integrity had been compromised . MOTION: Len Pacheco moved to approve the request to remove the property from the Historic Resources Inventory. The motion was seconded by Michae l Kan e and approved 4-0-1 . Adjournment The meeting was adjourned at 5:14p.m. The next regular meeting is scheduled for Ma y 25 , 2016 at 4:00p.m. Prepared by: Sylvie Roussel , Administrative Assistant Approved by: Mami Moseley, AJCP Associate Planner _:. I < )14 'o/ 1 -;4 Bob Cowan 7 Chair N:\DEV IHI STORI C PR ESERVA TIO N\HPCminutcs\2016\HPCminutes 5·11 ·16 Spccial.docx This Page Intentionally Left Blank August 23, 2016 Mr. Azhar Khan Community Development Department Town of Los Gatos 11 0 E. Main Street Los Gatos, CA 95031 RE: 16982 Kennedy Road: Lot 8 and Lot 9 Dear Azhar: ARCHITEcruRE PLANNING URBAN DESIGN I reviewed the drawings, and reviewed the site context. My comments and recommendations are as fo ll ows : Neighborhood Context The site is located in an older establis h ed neighborhood of mostly modest one-story homes. Photographs of the site and nearby homes are shown on the following page. 700 LARKSPUR LANDIN G C I RCLE . SU ITE 199 . LARKSPUR . CA . 94939 EXHIBIT 7 TEL : 4 ·1 5.33 1 .3 7 95 CDGPLAN@PAC B(LL .NET The sit e and ex i st tng house H ouse to the tm m edtat e left Nearb y H o me Nearby Home CANNON DE SIGN GROUP 16982 Kennedy Road Design Review Comments August 23, 2016 Page 2 H ou se tm mediat ely across Ke nnedy Road H o use t o the tmmediate right N ea rby Home Nearby Home 700 LARK SPUR LANDING CIR CLE. SU ITE 199. LARKS PUR. CA. 94939 Iss u es a n d Recommendations 16982 Kenn.dy Road Design Review Comments August 23, 2016 Page 3 The two homes are well designed with a style and scale that would fit comfortably in thi s neig hborhood. There are, however , a few conflicts with t h e Town's Res iden tial Design Guid elines and a few detail issues. 1. While the colored front elevation appears to show the Living Room projectin g in front of th e wall to its right, as would b e ty pical for this architectural style , the facade is not all that articulated -see diagram to the right. 2. The trim at the bottom of the d ecorative gable end ve nts would typically have an other wider trim board b elow the thin one sh own on the elevation s. "' I I I I ------:J!J + Flatness is not typical of this archi tectural style 3. T h e window sashes look too narrow. I did not see a note as to the type and material, but when I see small sashes, I usually think o f thin sash vinyl wind ows which would n o t be consistent with this architectural style. LOT 8 Recommendations 1. Extend the Living Room forward . "' I I II :::::::J!I Extend Living Room forward 2 . Add typical wide trim board below thin trim at the gable vent infill. 3 . Use wood or vinyl -over-wood windows to provide wider sashes typical of the architectural style . look too narrow be wood or vinyl over wood CANNON D ESIGN GROUP 700 LAR KSPU R LANDI NG CIRCLE. SU ITE 199 . LAR KSPUR . CA . 94939 16982 Kennedy Road Design Rev iew C omments Augusl 23, 2016 Page 4 1. T he garage is located at the front wall of the house while most nearby homes have the garage well recessed from the street as has been p roposed for the Lot 8 house. This front facade garage would not be consistent with Resi - dential Design Guidelin es 2.4.1 and 3.4.1 -see diagram below. 2.4.1 Locate gara ges to reinfo rce the predo minant neighborhood pattern • Along street fronts with narrow driveways and garages lo cated at the rear of parcels, repeat that pattern. • Wher e garages near the front face of the houses are common, a similar location is acceptable, but the garage fro nt should generally be set back from th e fro n t facade. 3 .4.1 Limit the pro mine n ce o f gar ages • Avoid designs that allow the garage to dominate the street facade. • Set garages back from the front facade. • Recess garage doors as much as possible from the garage facade. CANNON DESIGN G ROUP 7 00 LARKSPUR LANDING CIRCLE . SU ll E 199 . LAR KSP U R . CA . 9 4939 2. The gable dormer on the front facade poses two issues 16982 Kennedy Road Design Revi ew Comments August 23, 2016 Page 5 • The gable dormer presents as a strong front facade focal point, but it has little fenestration and the one small window is awkwardly located at the far right of the dormer wall. • The juncture of the shed and gable dormers is awkward, and unusual for the architectural style. Juncture of shed and gable roofs is awkward r Gable dormer is a focal point feature but lack of fenestration is not good ,.. ... Garage is more dominant than entry and is not consistent with Residential Design Guideline 3.4.1 3. The porch depth is smaller than the minimum established by Residential D es ign Guideline 3.10.1. 4. The decorative gable vent on the left side elevation is much larger than is common for this architectural style. Decorative gable vent this large would be unusual for this architectural style Porch depth Is smaller than the minimum I + established by Residential Design Guideline 3.1 0 .1 I CANNO N DESIGN GROUP 700 LARKSPUR LANDII'.G CIRCLE . SU ITE 199 . LARKS PUR . CA. 94939 LOT 9 Recommendations I 6982 Ken ned y Road Design Review C ommem s August 23, 2016 Page 6 1. Modify the two front dormers to provide a single unified shed dormer. With that change 1 would be comfortable with the singe bathroom window at the right. However, if staff is t roubled h) that, an additional smaU window could be added in the closet, as has been done on some other Los Gatos homes that I have reviewed . 2. The issues of the garage location and the shallow porch depth are more problematic. Moving the garage further back from the street would require some substantial ftoor p la n changes, and would best be done by the applicant. If staff were not concerned by the inconsistencies with the Residential Design Guidelines, the front elevation, with the dormer r ecommendation above, would look Jjke the diagram bel ow. Use a single shed dormer i n lieu of the gable dormer Alternatives to that would be : A. A revised design by the applicant, as noted above. B . Increase the porch depth and add col umns across the facade in front of the garage . Some minor adjustments in roof slopes might be needed. Increase porch depth CIINNON DESIGN GROUP Use a single shed dormer In lieu of the gable dormer --·--·-.. -...................................... Add columns Sec. 29.40.070. -Projection s allowed into yards. (b) Cornices, eaves, belt courses, sills, c ano pies, bay windows, chimneys or o ther similar architectural fea- tures may extend or project into a required sid e yard n o t m o re than twen ty -four (2 4) inches a nd may extend or project into a required front or rear yard not more than thirty (30) in ches. 700 LIIRKSPUR LANDING C I RCLE. SUITE 199 . LAR KSPUR . CA . 94939 16982 Kennedy Road De sign Review C omments August 23 ,2016 Page 7 C . Increase the porch depth and extend the roof overhang at the porch. Some minor adJustments in roof slopes might be needed . lncrease ~tr.Jc lr porch · 11 : : ! depth -=~== == ... --·· · .-.-~-- l--... --. -·· Use a single shed dormer i n lieu of the gable dormer 3 . Reduce the size of the decorative vent on the left side elevation. Use a single shed dormer in lieu of the gable dormer Move columns forward I t (minimum of 2 ft .) r-----" Azhar, please let me know if you have any question s, or if there are other issues that I did not address. Sincerely, CANNON DESIGN GROUP Larry L. Cannon CANNON DESIGN GROUP 700 LARKSPUR LANDI NG CIR CLE . SU ITE 199 . LA RKSP U R . CA. 9493 9 This Page Intentionally Left Blank i 00 ~Jb Walter Levison r C ONSU L TING ARBORIST J~ --.... ~ ..... -. _., ... _ . ...___ ... ASCA Registered Consulting Arborist #401 /ISA Tree Risk Asse ssme nt Qualified /ISA Certified Arborist tNI/C-3172 cell (415) 203-0990 I drtree@sbcgloba l.net Assessment of Eleven (11) Protected-Size Trees at and adjacent to 16982 Kennedy Road, Lots 8 & 9 Los Gatos, California Prepared for: Mr. Azhar Khan, Assistant Planner Town of Los Gatos Community Development Department I Planning Division 110 E. Main Street Site Address : 16982 Kennedy Road, Lots 8 & 9, Los Gatos, CA Los Gatos, CA 95030 Field Visit: Walter Levison, Contract Town Arborist (CTA) 8/12/2016 Report by CT A Version: 8/17/2016 1 of37 Registered Member. American Society of Consulting Arborists and Member of t he International Soci ety of Arboriculture @Walter Lellison 2016 All Rights Reserved ,EXHIBIT 8 Version: 8/1712016 ~~ ~~!~~r,.!-~"~ig~m ~~- ASCA Registered Consulting Arborist #401/ISA Tree Risk Assessment Qualified /I SA Certified Arborist tNVC-3172 cell (415) 203-0990 I drtree@sbcglobal.net Table of Contents 1.0 Summary 3 2.0 Assignment & Background 10 3.0 Tree Location & Protection Fence Map 11 4.0 Observations & Discussion 13 5.0 Town of Los Gatos-What Trees are Protected? 13 6.0 Recommendations 14 7.0 Tree Protection and Maintenance Directions per Town Code 21 8.0 Tree Replacement Standards-Los Gatos Town Code 25 9.0 Author's Qual ifications 27 10.0 Assumptions and Limiting Conditions 28 11.0 Certification 29 12.0 Digital Images 29 13.0 Tree Data Table 33 Site Address: 16982 Kennedy Road, Lots 8 & 9 , Los Gatos, CA Reg istered Member, American Socie ty of ConsuiHng Arbori sts and Member of the International Society of Arboriculture e Walter Le vison 2016 All Rights Re served 2 of37 Version: 8/17120 16 ~)~ ~~l~~;,.~~~'i;2~ J&\ ,_ .. , ... ~· ....v .. n •·• .. _. ............. -....... .. ASCA Registered Consulting Arborist #401 /ISA Tree Risk Assessment Qualified liSA Certified A rborist INVC-3172 cell (415) 203-0990 I drtree@sbcglobal.net 1.0 Summary a . Matrix style overview of protected-size trees (non-exempt species , 4 inches diameter at 4 .5 feet above grade). Below, the CTA has outlined expected impacts to each t ree , along with suggestions for adjustments to the plan set where applicable that would optimize tree survival over the long term . Removal trees a re noted as such in the matrix. The CTA calculated the appraised value of each tree, which can be used as a tool for determining the proper security bond amount to have the applicant post with the Town as a hedge against site plan-related tree damages (if appl icable). Appraised values can also be used by Staff to determine damage fees if t rees are determined during or after constru ct ion to have been damaged such that mitigation is required . Mitigation replacement rate and size is noted below for each tree in the case that removal o r damage to ind ivi dual trees being retained occurs as a result of site plan construction work. ·--·-··---~-----·-···--··--···--······ ········--· --··-····--·-····--····-··········· Large LOT Tree Tag Common Name Protected Appraised NUMBER Number Tree Value (LPT)? 9 1 Deodar cedar $26,400. 9 2 Deodar cedar $27 ,900. -~--~ -- Site Address : 16982 Kennedy Road. Lots 8 & 9. Los Gatos. CA Reg istered M ember. American Society of Consulti ng Arborists and Member of t he Internati onal Society of Arboriculture Q Waher Levison 2016 All Rights Reserved Site plan changes or restrictions required to reduce impacts to less than significant Re-align or eliminate proposed su b grade items that are currently shown as clustered in the area within zero to 30 feet of this tree (e .g . gas and electric trenches along lot 8 west property lin e , storm drain related work , sewer pipe , sump dra in pipe, gravel infiltrati o n device , etc.), to farther offset f rom the tree, so th at root protection zone fencing can be erect ed and maintained at least 25 feet offset from trunk throughout the entire site plan project. Re-align or elim inate proposed subgrade items that are currently shown as clustered in t he area within zero to 2 0 feet of this tree (e.g . storm drain related work, sewer pipe, sump drain p ipe , gravel infiltration device, etc.), to farther offset from the tree, so that root protection zone fencing can be e rected and maintained at least 25 feet offset from trunk throughout the entire site plan project. 3 of 37 Replacement Rate Per Replacement Canopy Lost Size Tree 4 24" box 4 24" box Ve rsion: 8/17120 16 I I ~jh Walter Levison rl C 0 N S U L T I N G A R 8 0 R I S T "\ ~~A "':::-··.::.·--~::..: .. ASCA Registered Consulting Arborist #40111SA Tree Risk Assessment Qualified liSA Certified Arborist #VVC-3172 cell (415) 203-0990 I drtree@sbcglobal.net Large LOT Tree Tag Common Name Protected Appraised NUMBER Number Tree Value (LPT)? 9 3 Colorado blue $1 ,540. spruce 9 4 Cypress species $640 . 9 5 European birch $650 . 8 6 Saucer magnolia $850. 8 7 Southern $2 ,1 60. magnolia California bay 8 10 laurel $750. Site Add111ss: 16982 Kennedy Roed, Lots 8 & 9, Loa Gatos, CA Registered Member, American Society of Consulting Arborists .nd Member of the tntemetional Society of Arboric:Uture e> Walter Levison 2016 AI Rights Reserwd Replacement Site plan changes or restrictions required to Rate Per Replacement reduce impacts to less than significant Size Tree Canopy Lost (To be removed). 3 24 "box (To be removed ). 3 24 " bo x (To be removed ). 3 24 " bo x (To be removed). 3 24" box (To be removed). 3 24" box (IF TREE TO BE RETAINED) Storm drain line trench would need to be eliminated or radically adjusted from current proposed alignment, in order to avoid catastrophic root loss to this tree. 3 24 " bo x Irrigat ion pipe trenching would also need to be eliminated, by using a no-cut flexible tubin g system such as Netafim W diameter emitter lines laid on grade. ------ 40137 Version: 8117/2016 ~Jb Walter Levison r CO NSU LT ING ARBORI S T '~ ~tA ---~ .. ~ .. -...---.. .. _...__ .... ASCA Registered Consulting Arborist #401 /ISA Tree Risk Assessment Qualified /ISA Certifi ed Arborist #1/1/C-3172 cell (415) 203-0990 I drtree@sbcglobal.net Large LOT Tree Tag Common Name P rotected Appraised NUMBER Number Tree Value (LPT}? Coast redwood 8 11 (NEIGH BOR $17 ,100. TREE) Deodar cedar (APP EARS TO 9 12 BEA $23 ,000. NEIGHBOR TREE) Site A ddress: 16982 Kennedy Road. Lots 8 & 9 . Los Gatos. CA Registered Memb er. American Society of Consu lti n g Artlonsts and Member of the I nternational Socie ty of Arboricutture 0 Walte r Levison 2016 All Rights Re served Replacement Site plan changes or restrictions required to Rate Per Replacement reduce impacts to less than significant Size Tree Canopy Lost Restrict digging on Kennedy property to shallow swale forming as shown on the proposed plan sheet C-2 to 4 inches total cut depth if possible. Do not cut new landscape irrigation pipe trenches w ithin 30 feet of the trunk of this tree. 6 24 "box Use over-grade poly tubing and emitter lines laid over grade as the alternative. Fence per CTA's tree map in th is report to protect roots growing into our project a rea far past the property boundary fence line. Limit all new cuts for graded swales and new paving to 4 inches max. cut below existing grade elevation in the proposed rear patio area shown on sheet C-2 as "permeable pavers". Use Tensar BX1100 biaxial geogrid or equivalent (Mirafi brand , etc .) as an underlayment to allow baserock base layer to be as much as 50 % thinner than normal engineer's spec base excavation th ickness , 6 24" box which will help achieve the goal of keeping all work above that maximum cut elevation of 4 inches below e xisting soil grade throughout the rear patio area. Fence off the root zone per the CTA's tree map, since roots from this tree extend far northward into our project area. 5 of 3 7 Version : 8/1 712016 I ~jh Walter Levison rl C 0 N S U L T I N G A R 8 0 R I S T ''=-\ -~f~. ASCA Registered Consulting Amorist #401 liSA Tree Risk Assessment Qualified liSA Certified Amorist WVC-3172 cell (415) 203-0990 I drtree@sbcglobal.net Large Replacement LOT Tree Tag Common Name Protected Appraised Site plan changes or restrictions required to Rate Per Replacement NUMBER Number Tree Value reduce impacts to less than significant Canopy Lost Size Tree (LPT)? (IF TREE TO BE RETAINED) The proposed storm drain would have to be relocated to minimum 15 feet offset from trunk 9 13 Coast live oak $750. edge. 2 24 " box Use over-grade no-dig type irrigation pip ing such as Netafim W diameter emitter lines to avoid pipe trenching withi n 15 feet of trunk edge. 2016 Town of Los Gatos In-lieu fee equivalent= $250 per each required 24" box mitigation tree planting not installed on the site. Summary 1.0 (a) continued: SUMMARY OF EXPECTED TREE IMPACTS (Based on applicant's current proposed grading and drainage plan sheet C-2 for Lots 8 & 9, version 712712016 by NNR Engineering, submitted to Town of Los Gatos planning division): i. Gas & Electric I Lot 8: Current proposed gas and electric utility trenching will occur along the west boundary of Lot 8, and is expected to destroy the east side of the root system of cedar #1 (the trunk of which splits across Lots 8 and 9). The CTA suggests that th is utility trenching be completely relocated to another area of the property such that we can retain the east portion of the cedar #1 root system intact. I ii. Permeable Paver Driveway I Lot 8: The Lot 8 driveway is proposed as a permeable paver driveway system. New technology has allowed for use of materials which are truly permeable such that water literally flows th rough the paver material itself, allowing for storm rain volumes to be captured within the driveway material and below. However, engineering specifications still (as in the past) require that a significant thickness of base course be placed underneath these pavers, which has the potential to damage or destroy a lateral-growing tree root system that grows mainly within the uppermost two feet of the soil profile, unless the base section excavat ion cut depth is limited to approximately 4 to 6 inches maximum cut below existing soil grade elevations. Typical base course (class II aggregate base, etc.) thickness is approximately 6 to 12 inches for driveways. If a Mirafi or Tensar brand (or equivalent) biaxial geogrid plastic matrix is laid over the soil prior to placement of the base course rock material, this thickness can be reduced to about 4 to 6 inches total cut, depending on the engineer's approval. Reduction of the thickness means that finish grade is reduced , and the project can still be built without excessive elevation rise of the driveway. Site Address : 16982 Kennedy Road, Lots 8 & 9. Los Gatos. CA Registered Member, American Sodety of COiliUitlng Arborists end Memb« of the lntfiiNitional Sod ely of Arboric:Uture e Walter Levison 2016 Al1 Rights Reserved 6 of37 Ve~on: 811712016 ~lb Walter Levison r CO NSU L TING ARBORIST J~ ., ... _ ... .,,~,.,.,.r,. ,_ ... _ . ...__ .. ASCA Registered Consulting Arborist #401 l iSA Tree Ri sk Assessment Qualified l iSA Cert ified Arborist #VVC -31 72 cell (4 15) 203-0990 I drtree@sbcglobal.net If the driveway elevation rise is not a problem, then metal or wood edging can be pinned into the ground to hold the pavers us ing steel p ins, and the whole system remains a tree-friendly driveway, as long as the edging is not trenched i nto the ground be low the elevation of the biaxial geogrid plastic matrix. A sample spec detail showing geogrid use near a specimen tree is included below in the recommendat ions section of this report. iii. Water Meter and Water Service Line I Lot 8: The proposed water meter upgrade on Lot 8 is approximately 4 to 5 feet offset from the trunk of cedar #1 which is located at the northmost point of t he Lot 8 and Lot 9 property boundary shown on sheet C-2. If the water meter is upgraded , the CTA assumes that the entire water pipe itself might also be upgraded by trenching in a new, larger diameter pipe to accommodate the new meter and new residence fire water requirements , etc. The CTA suggests that we avoid all new water line trenching , other than the m inimum required action (which is the upgrade of only the water meter box itself), to avoid undue damage to the root system of cedar #1 . Another option would be to completely relocate the entire water service hookup at a different location along the water main out at Kennedy Road to create a better offset between water pipe trench and cedar #1 trunk. iv. Graded Swale and Storm Drain Piping and Inlet Box I Lot 8: The proposed storm drain inlet, p ipe , and associated grading for an earth swale on Lot 8 could potentially damage the root system of neighbor-owned redwood #11 , an extremely large specimen that is offset from the property corner, but with a root system that does not respect property boundaries , and is lik ely growing laterally (horizontally) well into our 16982 Kennedy Rd work site. To minimize damage to the root system of this tree, the CTA suggests that fencing be erected per the tree map in this report (see red dashed li nes), to prevent access to the redwood #11 root system throughout the south corner of Lot 8 . The proposed work can occur as proposed , as long as fencing is erected to prevent damage to the section of tree #11 root system that is just south of the proposed work . v. Sump System for Basement at Lot 9: This system will conflict with the root systems of Lot 9 deodar cedars #1 and #2 , and is suggested to be moved farther from the trees to allow for fencing to be erected and mainta ined throughout the entire project at 25 feet out from the trees without any changes to the fencing . Sheet C-2 shows various p iping and boxes related to this pressurized system. vi. Storm Drain Pipe Trenches I Lots 8 & 9: Proposed trenches will confl ict with bay #1 0 on Lot 8 , and oak #13 on Lot 9, both of which will be required to be removed if the trench alignments are cut as currently proposed . If th e drain pipe trenches are requ ired to be cut at the locations currently shown on applicant sheet C-2, then the trees will need to be removed , and mitigation fees paid us ing the above matrix as a gu ide ($2 50 per each canopy replacement mitigation tree not actually installed on site). The CTA expects that these pipe trenching locations are likely not going to be adjustable, and therefore shows these two trees as being removed in the tree removal fee breakdown in section 6 .0 , item #2. vii. Sanitary Sewer I Lot 9: Current proposed sewer pipe alignment will destroy cedar #1 on Lot 9. The sewer a lignment will need to be completely changed to place this pipe at least 25 to 30 feet offset from the trunk of cedar #1 so that protective fencing can be erected at 25 feet offset from trunk. viii. Graded Swale I Lot 9 : The proposed graded swale on Lot 9 could potentially cause sig nif icant root loss along the north side of the cedar #12 root system where the tree's roots extend beyond the property boundary fence northward into the project a rea on Lot 9. The CTA suggests restricting cut depth to a maximum of 4 inches cut below existing grade for this area, in order to minim ize root loss and root damage to cedar #12. Site Address: 16982 Kennedy Roa d . Lots 8 & 9 . Los Gatos. CA Registered Member. American Society of Consulting Arborists and Member of the I nternational Society of Arboriculture Cl Walter Levison 2016 Alt Rights Reserved 7 of37 Version : 8/17/2016 ~Jb Wa l ter Levison r CO NS ULT ING A RB O RI S T ~~ ~~~ ...__ ......... w . ..-..... , .. .. -... ......................... ~ ... ASCA Registered Consulting Arborist #401 /ISA Tree Risk Assessment Qualified /I SA Certified Arborist tM/C-3172 cell (415) 203-0990 I drtree@sbcglobal.net ix. Permeable Paver Patio I Lot 9: As discussed in item 1.0 a(ii) above, permeable pavers have an eco "cache", even though they are no more tree friendly than any other hardscape material, since the base section area still needs to be excavated out and filled with base rock material such as class II aggregate base, gravel , etc. The only way to make a paver system t ruly tree root friendly is to restrict total cut for base section excavation to a depth of ideally 4 inches below existing soil surface grade elevation , or worst case scenario 6 inches below existing soil grade. As discussed in 1.0 a (ii) above, the use of a biaxial geogrid plastic matrix material as an overlayment pinned down over the soil surface prior to laying baserock down allows for the baserock base course thickness to be reduced by as much as 50% to something on the order of 4 to 8 inches thickness , which then allows for a significant reduction in the finish elevation of the driveway surface and helps match surrounding grades. If the rear yard patio pavers are not installed using the above recommended method, then excavation for base course may cause severe root damage or root loss to the north side of the root system of neighbor-owned cedar #12 , resulting in potential decline of the tree. Refer to the geogrid side-cut spec detail in recommendations section 6.0 for a real-world example of this system. x. Pe rmeable Paver Driveway I Lot 9: The proposed new permeable paver driveway on Lot 9 will encroach to within approx imately 3 to 5 linear feet from the trunk edge of cedar #2 (see tree map). This type of extremely close encroachment of hardscape is only acceptable if the paver system is built over grade with only very minimal cut as discussed above in (ii) and (ix), not to exceed approximately 4 inches total cut depth below existing soil surface grade elevations. If this cut depth restrict ion is not possible , even after use of a biaxial geogrid to thin the required base section thickness by 50%, then the CTA suggests that the driveway footprint itself be moved 4 to 6 feet westward to allow for a total offset of approximately 7 to 11 feet between trunk edge and driveway edge. Even with the driveway footprint shifted westward, cut depth for base course should still be restricted to no more than 4 to 6 inches below existing soil grade, if possible. Of course, use of the geogrid system in combination with a driveway footprint shifted farther offset from the trunk of tree #2 can also be considered . xi. Landscape Irrigation Trenching: Irrigation trenching is not shown on the applicant's sheet L 1 for Lots 8 or 9. The applicant will therefore have to verify that all irrigation within 25 or 30 feet of all trees being retained is going to be over-grade "no dig" type irrigation piping only, such as Yz" solid poly tubing and Netafim Yz" diameter emitter lines laid over grade with mulch placed over the lines. This will avoid causing unnecessary root damage or root loss to trees being retained on Lots 8 and 9, and on neighbor-owned trees #11 and #12 being retained behind the rear yards of the two project sites. b . Security Bonding: The new 2015 iteration of the Town tree ordinance section 29.10.1000 (c)3 includes wordage that requires that all trees being retained on a development site need to be appraised for dollar value at the applicant's expense prior to building or grading permits being issued by the Town . Part 'f' of this same tree ordinance section states that the Town may condition a security bond prior to issuance of a permit, in the sum of $5,000 per each tree being preserved , or $25 ,000, whichever is less. The ordinance does not contain wordage as to whether this includes neighbor-owned trees adjacent to construction. Therefore , the CTA will assume that neighbor-owned trees are included as trees "required to be preserved " (if applicable). Site Address: 16982 Kennedy Road. Lots 8 & 9. Los Gatos. CA Registered Member. American Society of Consulting Arborists and Member of the Internationa l Society of Arboriculture © Walter Levison 2016 All Rights Reserved a of37 Version 8117/2016 ~Jb Walter Levison r CO NSU LT ING ARBOR I S T .it\ ASCA Registered Consulting Arborist #401 /I SA Tree Risk Assessment Qualified /I SA Certified A rborist #\NC-3 172 cell (415) 203-0990 I drtree@sbcgl obal.net Note that the total appraised value of trees being retained (i.e. tree #11 on Lot 8 , and trees #1 , #2, and #12 on Lot 9, assuming that trees #1 0 and #13 will be removed or be considered "removals" to accommodate storm drain pipe trenching) per the CTA's determ ination above in table 1.0(a) is $17,100 (Lot 8) and $77,300 (Lot 9), far beyond the potential minimum ($5 ,000 per tree retained) security bond per Town ord inance. Therefore , if applicable, it would be reasonable , based on the actual appraised values of the trees being retained at these sites, for the Town to condition project approval upon posting of security bonds in the amounts of $17,100 for Lot 8, and $77,300 for Lot 9. Alternatively, the Town could ask for the minimum security bond amounts per Town ordinance 29.10.100 (c)3 , which would be $5,000 for one (1) tree being retained on Lot 8, and ($5,000 X 3 trees being retained= $15,000) for Lot 9. This minimum bond level is shown by the CTA in the recommendations section 6.0 below in this report. c. Trees Being Removed & Retained : Removals I Lot 8: #S, 7 , (10). Retained I Lot 8: #11. Removals I Lot 9: #3, 4, 5 , (13). Retained I Lot 9: #1 , 2 , 12. d. Landscape Trees: No trees are currently proposed to be installed on Lots 8 or 9. Therefore , mitigation for loss of trees being removed on Lots 8 and 9 will need to be paid as $250 per each Town-required canopy replacement mitigation tree not installed on site. See fee breakdown below in part 'e'. e. Fees for Removals: Removals I Lot 8: #S, 7, (10). Fees based on $250 per 24" box canopy replacement tree: #6 : $750. #7 : $750 . #10: $750. Total : $2 ,250 . Removals I Lot 9: #3, 4, 5 , 13 Fees based on $250 per 24 " box canopy replacement tree: #3: $750. #4: $750. #5: $750. #13: $500. Total : $2 ,750 . Si te A ddress: 16982 Kennedy Road. Lots 8 & 9, Los G atos , CA Registered Member. American Society of Consulting Arborists and Member of the I nternational Society of Arboriculture C> Walter Levison 2016 All Rights Reserved 9 of37 Version: 8/1712016 ~jh Walter Levison rl C 0 N S U L T I N G A R 8 0 R I S T ASCA Registered Consulting Arborist #401/ISA Tree Risk Assessment Qualified liSA Certified Arborist #\NC-3172 2.0 Assignment & Background Walter Levison , Contract Town Arborist (CTA) was directed to tag and assess all Protected Size (4 inch diameter and greater) trees both on the property proposed for site plan work and (in some cases) adjacent to the site plan area within 10 linear feet of property lines. Note that "exception" trees not protected under the current Town tree ordinance (e.g. fruit and nut trees <18 inches d iameter, and Tasmanian blue gum , red gum, blackwood acacia , tulip tree , tree of heaven , palms (except Phoenix canariensis), and privet <24 inches diameter, etc.) were not assessed by the CTA. On "Hillside" properties (see Hillside map, next page), all eucalyptus species are considered exception trees , and are not protected by Town ordinance provisions. "Large protected t ree " (LPT) as noted in the tree table below in this report means any oak (Quercus), California buckeye (Aescu/us califomica), or Pacific madrone (A rbutus menziesii) which has a 24 inch or greater diameter (75 inch circumference); or any othe r species of tree with a 48 inch or greater diameter (150 inch circumference). Trunk measurement in the case of a multiple stem tree is the sum of all mainstem diameters. ,\\ _t,J~ .. cell (415) 203-0990 I drtree@sbcglobal.net -r ;:.-:r.::::-.::==== ,.. .............. _._c-. o.;:.:-.=:::..a:r:-..::· -· .::.-.=-..:.-=:--::r. ............... ._ --=r _-=:=·-r ·--:... The applicant submitted a third-party arborist letter report (albeit very terse) by Kevin Kielty , Arborist, dated 6 /1 0/2016. This report was a 4 page document with tree data and some minimal tree protection recommendations . A tree location map was not submitted with this report, but the tree locations were noted on the applicant's submittal set by tree tag number. The CTA did not use any of the tree data information from this 3rd -party report, except for trunk diameter measurements , due to the following issues: • Tree heights, although they were claimed to have been measured us ing a Nikon digital forestry pro 550 hypsometer which is the same tool that is used by the CTA, appeared in many cases to be sign ificantly greater than actual heights, based on the CTA's visual assessment of heights and on the CTA's own 550 hypsometer dig ital readouts determined on 8/12/2016. • Tree species determinations appeared to be in one or two cases incorrect. • Tree condition ratings as stated in the letter report were not precise enough for the CTA's standards . Note that trees #8 and #9 tagged by the applicant's arborist were omitted from the Town Arborist report, since they are not tree species regulated by the Town . The applicant is free to remove these two trees , or protect and retain them at their discretion . Site Address: 16982 Kennedy R08d. Lots 8 & 9 , Lot Gatos. CA Registered Member, American Society of Consulting Arbori&ts and Member of the International Society of ArboriCIAture c Wrlter Lellison 2016 All Rights Reserved 10 of37 vnon: 811712016 ~J)J ~~~~~r.N!-~.v.ig~~ ASCA Registered Consulting Arborist #401 liSA Tree Risk Ass essment Qualified liSA Certified Arborist tNVC-3172 3.0 Tree Location & Protection Fence Map J~ ..... -~ .. -o<:'*"h.-. ·--.. ·---·- cell (415) 203-0990 I drtree@sbcglobal.net The applicant 's arborist tagged all trees in this study at 5 to 6 feet above grade using large racetrack shaped tags numbered as noted on the tree map below right (except for neighbor trees which were assessed from afar). The CTA marked up the applicant's site plan sheet s C-2 for both Lots 8 and 9 , both dated 7/27/2016 by NNR Engineering of San Jose , California, which showed most of the existing trees on and off site. Tree #1 0 on Lot 8 was not plotted by the applicant's team . Trees #12 and #13 were not plotted by the applicant's team . These three trees #10 , 12, and #13 were therefore "rough plotted " by the CTA. Note that tree #12 was assumed to be off-site, based on the applicant's arborist report wordage. The CTA could not open the locked gates at existing residential unit "8", and could therefore not access the rear yard area of proposed Lot 9 to assess the lower trunk and lower canopy area of tree #12 close-up. Tree #12 was therefore assessed from afar with only a view of the mid-elevation and higher-elevation areas of the canopy . The red dashed lines indicate the CTA's suggested chain link root protection fence alignments (i nitial rough). The CTA assumes that many of the current proposed work items indicated as being negative impacts to tree root systems per summary section 1.0 above in this report can and will be location-adjusted or eliminated to allow for much better offset distances between tree trunk edges and proposed work limits. Given this assumption, the CTA plotted red dashed root protection zone fence routes on the tree map directly through many areas where work is currently proposed on sheets C-2 Lot 8 and C -2 Lot 9. Sit e Address: 16982 Ke nnedy Road . Lots 8 & 9. Los Gatos. CA Registered Member. American Society of Consulting Arborists a nd Member of the International Society of Arboriculture c Walter Levison 2016 All Rights Reserved 11 of37 Version: 8/1712016 ~Jb Walter Levison r CO N SU LTI NG A RBORI ST '\\ ~}).. .,. ___ . .,..._ ..• ._, -· ·-----·"' ASCA Registered Consulting Arborist #401 liSA Tree Risk Assessment Qualified liSA Certified Arborist #INC-3172 cell (415) 203-0990 I drtree@sbcglobal.net Red dashed lines indicate CT A's sugges d Cfi8Tri I ink root ,._ 84 J.N:nvasva 6 V.O.OY Oi ' ' o. \ I ' ' I I WN i · ,~INES OF TREES -4 .. I -__,---·-·-/ : I ~ \ ___ ./ Site Address: 16982 Kennedy Road, Lots 8 & 9 , Los Gatos, CA Registered Member, American Society of ConsUlting Alt>oliats .nc1 Member of the lntematiOMI Society of Alt>olictAture Cl W alter Levison 2 0 16 Al1 Rights Reserved Sl!l>UO A8 ]>tl .U¥Jd0lld 0 ~]~C:V~'~f ~-KenAeciY.,&,~oad ~- 12 of37 ver,;on: 81171201 6 ~Jb Walter Levison r CONSU LT ING A R BOR I ST ASCA Reg istered Consulting Arborist #401 /ISA Tree Risk Assessment Qualified /ISA Certified Arborist tNI/C-3172 4.0 Observations & Discussion (See report section 1.0 Summary above for observation and discussion items). 5.0 Town of Los Gatos-What Trees are Protected? ~~ ...... _ ... -.oo-............ -· .. ·--"~--··~ cell (415) 203-0990 I drtree@sbcglobal.net Per the most recent (2015) iteration of the Town of Los Gatos tree ordinance (Town Code Chapter 29-Zoning Regulations , Article 1 ), the following regulations apply to all trees within the Town's jurisdiction (wordage adjusted): 1. All trees with at least a single mainstem measuring four (4) inches diameter or greater at 4.5 feet above grade are considered "Protected Trees" when removal relates to any development review. 2. 12 inch diameter (18 inch multistem total) trees on developed residential property not currently subject to development review. 3. 8 inch diameter (8 inch multistem total) blue oak (Quercus doug/asil), black oak (Quercus kellogil), California buckeye (Aesculus ca/ifomica), and Pacific madrone (Arbutus menziesit) on developed residential lots not currently subject to development review. 4 . 8 inch diameter (8 inch multistem total) trees on developed residential property not currently subject to development review, on lots in the designated Hillside Area per the official Town map. 5. All trees with a single mainstem or sum of multiple mainstems totaling 48 inches diameter or greater at 4 .5 feet above grade are considered "Large Protected Trees" (LPT). 6. All oak species (Quercus spp.), California buckeye (Aesculus californica), and Pacific madrone (Arbutus menziesit) with one or more mainstems totaling 24 inches diameter or more at 4 .5 feet above grade are considered "Large Protected Trees " (LPT). 7. Section 29.10.0965. Prohibitions: A permit is required to prune, trim , cut off, or perform any work , on a single occasion or cumulatively , over a three- year period, affecting 25% or more of any Protected Tree (including below ground root system). 8. Section 29.10 .0965. Prohibitions: A perm it is required to prune , trim , or cut any branch or root greater than four (4) inches in diameter of a Large Protected Tree. 9. Section 29.10.0965. Prohibitions: A permit is required to conduct severe pruning on any protected tree. Severe pruning is defined in section 29.10.0955 as "topping or removal of foliage or significant scaffold limbs or large diameter branches so as to cause permanent damage and/or disfigurement of a tree, and/or which does not meet specific pruning goals and objectives as set forth in the current version of the International Society of Arboriculture Best Management Practic es-Tree Pruning and ANSI A300-Part 1 Tree, Shrub, and Other Woody Plant Management-Standard Practices, (Pruning)." 10. Exceptions : Site Address: 16982 Ken nedy Road . Lots 8 & 9. Los Gatos. CA Registered Member. American Society o f Consulting Arborists a nd Member of the Int ernational Society of Arboriculture C> Waher Lellison 2016 All Rights Reserved 13 of 37 Version: 8/17/2016 ~J~ ~~1 ~~;,N~~~i~2~ '\\ iMA .._ ...... -...-.... ,. -__ ,. __ ... ASCA Registered Consulting Arborist #401/ISA Tree R isk Assessment Qualified /ISA Certified Arborist #N'/C-3172 cell ( 415) 203-0990 I drtree@sbcglobal.net Severe Pruning Exception in Town Code section 29.10.101 0(3) • ..... except for pollarding of fruitless mulberry (Morus alba) or other species approved by the Town Arborist .... •. Protected Tree Exceptions: a. Edible fruit or nut bearing trees less than 18 inches diameter (multistem total or single stem) b. Acacia melanoxylon (blackwood acacia) less than 24 inches (multistem total or single stem) c. Liriodendron tu/ipifera (tulip tree) less than 24 inches (multistem total or single stem) d. Ailanthus altissima (tree of heaven) less than 24 inches (multistem total or single stem) e. Eucalyptus globulus (Tasmanian blue gum) less than 24 inches (multistem total or single stem) f . Eucalyptus camaldulensis (River red gum) less than 24 inches (multistem total or single stem) g. Other eucalyptus species (E. spp.) not noted above, less than 24 inches (multistem total or single stem) (REMOVAL O.K. ONLY AT HILLSIDE AREA LOCATIONS PER OFFICIAL TOWN MAP): www.losgatosca .gov/documentcenter/view/176 h. All palm species (except Phoenix canariensis) less than 24 inches (multistem total or single stem) i. Ligustrum lucidum (glossy privet) less than 24 inches (mult istem total or single stem) 6.0 Recommendations 1. Project Arborist ("PA"): Initial Signoff It is suggested that a third party ASCA registered consulting arborist or ISA Certified Arborist with good experience with tree protection during construction be retained by the applicant, to provide pre-project verification that tree protection and maintenance measures outlined in this section of the arborist report are adhered to. Periodic (e.g . monthly) inspections and summary reporting , if required as a project condition of approval, are suggested in order to verify contractor compliance with tree protection throughout the site plan project. This person will be referred to as the project arborist ("PA"). The PA should also monitor soil moisture within the root protection zones of trees being retained, using a Lincoln soil moisture probe/meter or equivalent. If required , inspection reports shall be sent to Mr. Azhar Khan , Assistant Planner, at akhan@losgatosca.gov. Sample wordage for a condition of approval regarding monitoring of tree protection and tree condition (if required by Staff as a condition of approval): "The required protective fencing shall remain in place until final landscaping and inspection of the project. Project arborist approval must be obtained and documented in a monthly site activity report sent to the Town. A mandatory Monthly Tree Activity Report shall be sent at least once monthly to the Town planner associated with this project (akhan@losgatosca.gov) beginning with the initial tree protection verification approval letter". Site Address: 16982 Kennedy Road . Lots II & 9 . Los Glllos. CA Regist ered Member . Ameri can Society of Consulting Arbofista and Me-of the l ntemationel Society of Alborico.Ature e> Walter Levison 2016 All Rights Rese<Ved 14 of37 Ve~on: 811712016 ~J}J ~~!~fr,"~f~ig~m ASCA Registered Consulting A rborist #401 l iSA Tree R isk Assessment Qualified liSA Certified Arborist #VVC-3172 2. Pre-Project Team Plan Set Adjustments Requested: i. Pay Tree Removal In-Lieu Fees: (Per the Town tree canopy replacement standard matrix). Lot 8: $2,250 (trees #6 , 7 , 10). Lot 9: $2,750 (trees #3, 4 , 5, 13). ii. Security Bonding : ,,~ S, ~1\ "=·~".:..,~ ... ce ll (415 ) 203-0990 I drtree@sbc global.net It is suggested that Town Staff condition this project on receiving security bond monetary funds from the appl icant in the minimum amount of $5,000 (Lot 8) and $15,000 (Lot 9) as a hedge against potential decline or death of trees be ing retained in relatively close proximity to th e proposed site plan work footprints . Staff may choose to increase the fees to amounts above and beyond this minimum recommended fee , to inc lude full values of trees being retained (e.g. include full appraised value of cedar #1 which is $26,400 per summary section 1.0 in the CTA's report , etc.). Trees to be retained on Lot 8: #11 Trees to be retained on Lot 9: #1 , 2 , 12. iii. Lot 8 I Proposed Water Meter Upgrade: It is suggested that the proposed water meter upgrade be lim it ed to box replacement only, with no adjustments to the exi sting water pipes entering Lot 8, in order to avoid unnecessary root loss or damage to the east portion of the cedar #1 root system . If additional water volume is necessary and a new pipe is required to be installed between Kennedy Road and Lot 8, then use pit to pit bore (directional bore) techniques to install the pipe without performing any trenching within 25 feet of the trunk edge of cedar #1 , or simply re locate the entire water service line to a location that is 25 to 30 feet offset from cedar #1 . iv. Lot 8 I Proposed Gas and Electric Trench : If possible , the proposed gas and electric trench (s) on lot 8 shall be relocated to at least 25 linear feet or more offset from the trunk edge of cedar #1. If this is not possible , then utilize directional bore or similar technolog y to bore the util ities without trenching within 25 feet of ced ar #1. Site Address : 16982 Kennedy Road, lots 8 & 9, l os Gatos, CA Registered Member. American Society of Consulting Art>orists a nd Member of the International Society of Art>oriculture C Walter Levison 2016 All Rights Reserved 15 of37 Version: 8/17.120 16 Walter Levison CONSU LT I NG ARBORIST ~J)J I~ ,:t.;~~- ASCA Reoistered Consultino Arborist #401 /ISA Tree Risk Assessment Qualified /ISA Certified Arborist #WC-3172 cell (415) 203-0990 I ne t v. Lot 8 I Proposed Permeable Paver Driveway: Utilize biaxial geogrid plastic matrix material (e.g. Tensar BX-1100) as an overlayment pinned down over the soil surface prior to laying base rock for the proposed driveway, in order to thin the base section significantly, thereby reducing the depth of cut required near cedar #1 . If possible, restrict all excavation cuts to 4 inch maximum depth below existing soil grade (ideal), or 6 inches b.g . (worst case). Refer to the sample spec detail at right for an example of a real world project that utilized a geogrid overlayment to reduce excavation to zero (i.e. "no dig") adjacent to a historic oak specimen tree. Note that the paver-constraining edging used in these "no dig" scenarios is a solid metal edging by Ryerson , pinned with steel pins , which allows for the entire sandwich of materials to be placed over grade and made rigid without actually burying any edging below the depth of the geogrid placed on grade. EXISTING HERITAGE OAKTI\EE DBL LAYER OF 4 "-6" WASHED RIIIERSTONE (MAINTAI N 6" CLEARANCE FROM TI\EE TI\UNK) PERMEABLE INTERLOC KIN G PAVERS (MANUFACT\JRER, SIZE AND PATTERN T.B.D .) AASHTO N0.8 (3/8") CRUSHED STONE BASE IN FI LL PAVER JOINTS WITH SAME N0.8 CRUSHED STONE FILTER FABRIC - -..... OF ClASS II PERMEABLE AGGREGATE BASE HAND-TAMPED TO MAX. 75%-80% TYPICAL SECTION 1-1/2"= 1'-0" OPTIONAL: CONSIDER MOVING THE DRIVEWAY FOOTPRINT EASTWARD TO INCREASE THE OFFSET DISTANCE BETWEEN DRIVE EDGE AND TREE TRUNK EDGE TO 2X CURRENT PROPOSED OFFSET. vi. Lot 9/ Proposed Permeable Paver Driveway and Rear Yard Paver Patio: Utilize biaxial geogrid plastic matrix material (e.g. Tensar BX-1100) as an overlayment pinned down over the soil surface prior to laying base rock for the proposed driveway and the proposed patio at lot 9, in order to thin the base section significantl y, thereby reducing the depth of cut required near cedar #1 . If possible, restrict all excavation cuts to 4 inch maximum depth below existing soil grade (ideal), or 6 inches b . g. (worst case). Refer to the sample spec detail at right for an example of a real world project that utilized a geogrid overlayment to reduce exca vation to zero (i.e. "no dig") adjacent to a historic oak specimen tree. Note that the paver-constraining edging used in these "no dig" scenarios is a solid metal edging pinned down with steel pins, which allows for the entire sandwich of materials to be placed over grade and made rig id without a ctually burying any edging below the depth of the geogrid placed on grade. OPTIONAL: CONSIDER MOVING THE DRIVEWAY FOOTPRINT WESTWARD TO INCREASE THE OFFSET DISTANCE BETWEEN DRIVE EDGE AND TREE TRUNK EDGE TO 2X CURRENT PROPOSED OFFSET. Site Address: 16982 Kennedy Road, Lots 8 & 9, Los Gatos. C A Registered Member. American Society of Consulting Arborists and Member of the International Society of Arboriculture C> Walter Levison 2016 All Rights Reserved 16of37 Versi on: 811712016 ~J~ ~~!~~;,.~~~i~grr ~\ ~.~ ;: .... .(.;.!~ .. ASCA Registered Consulting Arborist #401 /ISA Tree Risk Assessment Qualified /I SA Certified Arborist #NJ C-3172 cell {415) 203-0990 I drtr ee@sbcglob al.net vii. Lot 9 I Proposed Sewer: Relocate the proposed lot 9 sewer pipe to at least 25 to 30 feet offset from the trunk edges of cedars #1 and #2 so that fencing can be erected and maintained at 25 to 30 feet offset from the trunk edges of the two trees. viii. Lot 9 I Proposed Storm Drainage Inlets and Piping: Relocate all proposed drainage-related inlet boxes, piping , etc. to at least 25 to 30 feet offset from the trunk edges of cedars #1 and #2 so that fencing can be erected and maintained at 25 feet offset from the trunk edges of the two trees . Note: If bay tree #1 0 on lot 8, and/or coast live oak #13 on lot 9 are to be preserved, then the cu rrent proposed storm drain p ip e routes will need to be completely eliminated or relocated. The CTA assumes for the purposes of this report that these two trees are to be removed due to the requ irement that the proposed storm drain trenches be built as currently proposed on sheet C-2. ix. Lot 9/ Proposed Basement Sump Pumping and Drainage System : Relocate the basement sump pumping and drainage system pipes, etc. that are currently proposed to be located w ithin approximately 10 feet of the trunks of cedars #1 and #2, to locations at least 25 to 30 feet offset from the trees , such that fencing can be erected and maintained at 25 feet from the trunk edges of cedars #1 and #2 . x. Lot 9 I Proposed Infiltration Box: Relocate the proposed drainage infiltration box currently proposed to be located approximately 11 to 13 feet south of the trunk edge of cedar #2 , to a position 25 to 30 feet from the trunk edge so that fencing can be erected and maintained at approxim ately 25 feet offset from the trunk edges of the two trees. xi. Lots 8 & 9/ Proposed Landscape Irrigation: All proposed new landscape irrigation piping (not shown on the applicant's plan set) w ithin 25 feet of trees being retained shall be no-d ig type flexible piping such as Netafim W diameter emitter lines, ~· diameter black poly tubing , etc. that do not requ ire any burial beneath the soil surface, and will therefore allow for 1 00% preservation of the root systems of trees being retained on lots 8 and 9. xii. Lots 8 & 9 I Proposed Swale Grading : Restrict all proposed new swale grading to (ideally) 4 inches maxi mum cut below exi sting soil grade, or (wo rst case) 6 inches total cut depth if absolutely necessary, to avoid unnecessary damage to the root systems of neighbor redwood #11 and ne ighbor cedar #12 , both of which are likely growing laterally throughout the entire rear yard areas of both lots 8 and 9 at the time of writing. Si1e Address: t 6982 Kennedy Road, Lots 8 & 9 , Los Gatos, CA Registered Member, American Society of Consulting Arborists and Member of the I nternational Society of Arboricutture "Waller Levison 2016 All Rights Reserved t 7 of37 Version: 8/1 712016 ~]h Walter L evison rl C 0 N S U L T I N G A R 8 0 R I S T ·~\ ~~~ .. _, ................... . ··--·--·*''' ASCA Registered Consulti ng Arborist #40111SA Tree Risk Assessment Qualified liSA Certified Arborist #WC-3172 cell {415) 203-0990 I drtree@sbcglobal.net xiii. Lots 8 & 9/ Temporary Irrigation During Construction : Supply cedars #1 and #2 with heavy irrigation on a 1x/week basis throughout the entire area shown on the CTA's tree map as a red dashed line, which is a contiguous chain link fenced root protection zone. Approximate irrigation volume: 200 gallons per week (i.e. 100 gallons per tree) applied on a single day, using whatever means are available such as water buffalo tank and spray apparatus, garden hose, emitter lines , sprinklers, soaker hoses, existing irrigation systems, etc. If possible, redwood #11 and cedar #12 , both on neighboring properties but with root systems that extend far into our lot 8 and lot 9 project areas, should also be supplied with 1 x/week heavy irrigation at approximately the same volume (i.e. 100 gallons per each tree, per week , applied on a single day). 3. Lot 9: Trunk Buffer Wrap Type Ill Protection: Prior to project start, install a trunk buffer around the lowermost 8 to 1 0 feet of the trunks of cedars #1 and #2. Wrap approximately 10 to 15 wraps of orange plastic snow fencing around the trunk between grade and 8 feet above grade to create a padding at least 1 to 2 inches thickness. Stand 2x4 wood boards upright, s ide by side, around the entire circumference of the trunk. Affix using duct tape (do not use wires or ropes). See spec image at right. 4. Lots 8 & 9: Chain Link Fencing Type I and/or Type II Protection: Erect five-foot tall chain link fence on seven-foot long, two-inch diameter iron tube posts pounded 24 inches into the ground (see sample image below right). Spacing shall be maximum 8 feet on-center between tube posts. Ideally, a spacing of 6 feet on-center is best. Optional for fencing material: Use chain link fencing panels set on moveable concrete block footings. Wire the fence panels to iron layout stakes pounded into the ground at the ends of each fence panel to keep the fence route stabilized and in its correct position. Do not wire the fence panels to the trunks of the trees. Pre-project fence: Pe r the red dashed lines on the tree map mark-up In the CT A's a r borlst report. Note that the fencing as shown on the tree map is initial rough only, and physically conflicts with many site plan work items (the CT A assumed that many of the current proposed work Item locations would be adjusted per the CTA's suggestions In recommendation item #2 above). Site Address: 16982 Kennedy Road . Lots 8 & 9, Los Gatos, CA Registered Member. American Society of Consulting Arborists and Member of the International Sodety of Art>olicuture C> Walter Levison 2016 Alt Rights Reserved 18 of37 Ve!$ion; 811712016 ~))J ~~!~~;,J~~};2Pr ~\ .~::.::o:.:..-~.!:~ .. ASCA Registered Consulting Arborist #401 /ISA Tree Risk Assessment Qualified /ISA Certified Arborist fNIJC-3172 cell (41 5) 203-0990 I drtree@sbcgloba l.net This fencing must be erected prior to any heavy machinery traffic or construction material arrival on site. The protective fencing must not be temporarily moved during construction . No materials, tools , excavated soil, liquids, substances, etc. are to be placed or dumped , even temporarily , inside the root protection zone or "RPZ". No storage, staging, work, or other activities will be allowed inside the RPZ except with PA monitoring. 5. Lots 8 & 9: Signage : The RPZ fencing shall have one sign affixed w ith UV-stabilized zip ties to the cha in l ink at eye level fo r every 25-linear feet of fencing , minimum 8"X11 " size each , plastic laminated , with wordage that includes the Town Code sectio n that refers to tree fence protection requirements (wordage can be adjusted): TREE PROTECTION ZONE FENCE ZONA DE PROTECCION PARA ARBOLES -NO ENTRE SIN PERMISO- ·LLAME EL ARBOLISTA- REMOVAL OF THIS FENCE IS SUBJECT TO PENAL TV ACCORDING TO LOS GATOS TOWN CODE 29.10.1025 PROJECT ARBORIST: TELEFONO CELL: Site Address: 16982 Kennedy Road . Lots 8 & 9 . Los Gatos. CA Registered Member. Ameri can Society of Consulting Alt>orists and Member of the International Society of Alt>oriculture C> Waller Lellison 2016 All Rights Reserved EMAIL: 19 of37 Version: 8/17/2016 Walter Levison CO NSULTI N G ARBORIST ~)~ ASCA Reaistered ConsuHina Arborist #401/ISA Tree Risk Assessment Qualified liSA Certified Arborist #WC-3172 6. Lots 8 & 9: Irrigation Temporary During Construction: Provide irrigation to cedars #1 and #2 on a weekly basis, applying approximately 200 gallons on a single day, us ing any means necessary, throughout the site plan work period. If possible, supply each of neighbor redwood #11 (root system area to be fenced off in lot 8) and cedar #12 (root system area to be fenced off in lot 9) with 100 gallons of irrigation water each, on a single day, 1x/week, throughout the site plan work period. See sample image at right , showing a soaker hose system set up around a specimen redwood during construction to provide weekly heavy irrigation. 7. Lot 9: Pruning (if applicable): All pruning shall be performed only by, or under direct full time supervision of an !SA-Certified Arborist. and shall conform to the most current iteration of the American National Standard Institute pruning guidelines and accompanying ISA Best Management Practices I Pruning booklet: • ANSI A300 (Part 1) tree, shrub, and other wood plant maintenance I standard practices (pruning). 2001 . 1\\ ~fA .. _, .......... .-..... .. '·-··· -~.ov·o..-... ,. • Best Management Practices I Tree Pruning: companion publication to the ANSI A300 Part 1: tree, shrub , and other wood plant maintenance I standard practices (pruning). International Society of Arboriculture . 2002. Suggested Pruning Prescriptions (Rx): • (If required) Perform lateral airspace clearance pruning, not to exceed a total cut of 10 horizontal feet , to reduce the north extension of the canopy of cedar #12 such that the proposed new rear yard patio area is cleared. • (Where necessary) Perform endweight reduction pruning to reduce branch and limb lengths by removing the outermost sections of certain over- extended limbs and branches. Site Address: 16982 Kennedy Road. Lots 8 & 9, Los Gatos. CA Registered Member, Americ.n Society of Consulting Arbolisll and Member of the lntem811onat Society of Arboliwlln Cl Wtitter Levison 2016 All Rights Retenled 20 of-37 Version: 811712016 ~Jh Walter Levison rl C 0 N S U L T I N G A R 8 0 R I S T -'_\ ~}}... ... _1-·A .. OV ..... W••n• '-~·· """·"'--""'· ASCA Registered Consulting Arborist #401 liSA Tree Risk Assessment Qualified /ISA Certified Arborist tNVC-3172 cell (415) 203-0990 I drtree@sbcglobal.net 8. Lot 9: Root Pruning : If woody roots measuring greater than 1-inch in diameter are encountered within 30-feet of any tree being retained during site work contractors shall immediately alert the project arborist, and shall proceed to sever roots at right angles to the direction of root growth using sharp hand tools such as professional grade loppers, hand shears, chain saw, A/C sawzall, or other tools only under his/her direct supervision. See spec images at right. Note that a Sawzall blade indicating use for "bimetal" or "demolition• is typically not a good choice for this work. Instead, opt for a relatively large-toothed blade that indicates use for "pruning" or "wood" (see image at right). Woody roots shall not be shattered or broken in any way as a result of site activities. Shattered or broken areas shall be hand dug back into clear healthy root tissue and re-severed at right angles to root growth direction under the direct supervision of the project arborist (PA). Immediately (same day) backfill over roots and heavily irrigate (same day) after backfill to saturate the uppermost 24 inches of the soil profile. If the roots cannot be backfilled the same day, then smear the cut ends with wet mud , and attempt to bury the ends in moist organic mulch such as wood chips. 9. Lot 9: Water Spray: Spray off foliage of all trees within 30 feet of construction activity using a very high power garden hose or a pressure washer system set on low pressure to wash both the upper and lower surfaces of foliage . This helps keep the gas portals (stomata) unclogged for better gas exchange which is crucial for normal tree function (see image at right in which a fire hose system was used to wash approximately 50 redwood tree specimens in Sunnyvale during a one year long demolition period). Spray should be applied approximately twice yearly , or when ambient airborne dust concentration is unusually high . 7.0 Tree Protection and Maintenance Directions per Town Code The following is excerpted directly from the 2015 iteration of the Town of Los Gatos tree ordinance sections which provide specific tree protection directions and limitations on root pruning and above-ground pruning: Sec. 29.1 0.1 000. New property development. (a) A tree survey shall be conducted prior to submittal of any development application proposing the removal of or impact to one or more protected trees. The development application shall include a Tree Survey Plan and Tree Preservation Report bas ed on this survey. The tree survey inventory numbers shall correspond to a numbered metal tag placed on each tree on site during the tree survey. The tree survey plan shall be prepared by a certified or consulting arborist, and shall include the following information : (1} Location of all existing trees on the property as described in section 29.10.0995; Site Address: 16982 Kennedy Road, lots 8 & 9, los Gatos, CA Registered Member, American Society of Consulting Arborists and Member of the International Society of Arboritulture c Walter lellison 2016 All Rights Reserved 21 of37 Version: 811712016 ~jh Walter Levison rl C 0 N S U l T I N G A A 8 0 A I S T ASCA Registered Consulting Arborist #401 liSA Tree Risk Assessment Qualified liSA Certified Arborist IVI/C-3172 I~ ~}A •... ':.:.:7: ·;: ... : •• :.:.:..:. •. cell (415) 203-0990 I drtree@sbcglobal.net (2) Identify all trees that could potentially be affected by the project (directly or indirectly-immediately or in long term), such as upslope grading or compaction outside of the dripline; (3) Notation of all trees classified as protected trees ; (4) In addition, for trees four (4) inches in diameter or larger, the plan shall specify the precise location of the trunk and crown spread , and the species , size (diameter, height, crown spread) and condition of the tree. (b) The tree survey plan shall be reviewed by the Town 's consulting arborist who shall, after making a field visit to the property, ind icate in writing or as shown on approved plans , which trees are recommended for preservation (based on a retention rating of high/moderate/low) using, as a minimum , the Standards of Review set forth in section 29.10.0990. This plan shall be made part of the staff report to the Town reviewing body upon its consideration of the application for new property development; (c) When development impacts are within the drip line of or will affect any protected tree , the applicant shall provide a tree preservation report prepared by a certified or consulting arborist. The report , based on the findings of the tree survey plan and other relevant information , shall be used to determine the health and structure of existing trees , the effects of the proposed development and vegetation removal upon the trees , recommendations for specific precautions necessary for their preservation during all phases of development (demolition , grading , during construction , landscaping); and shall also indicate wh ich trees are proposed for removal. The tree preservation report shall stipulate a required tree protection zone (TPZ) for trees to be retained, including street trees, protected trees and trees whose canopies are hanging over the project site from adjacent properties. The TPZ shall be fenced as specified in section 29.10.1005: (1) The final approved tree preservation report shall be included in the building permit set of development plans and printed on a sheet titled : Tree Preservation Instructions (Sheet T-1). Sheet T-1 shall be referenced on all relevant sheets (civil , demolition, utility, landscape , irrigation) where tree impacts from improvements may be shown to occur; (2) The Town reviewing body through its site and design plan review shall endeavor to protect all trees recommended for preservation by the Town 's consulting arborist. The Town reviewing body may determine if any of the trees recommended for preservation should be removed, if based upon the evidence submitted the reviewing body determines that due to special site grading or other unusual characteristics associated with the property, the preservation of the tree(s) would significantly preclude feasible development of the property as described in section 29.1 0.0990 ; (3) Approval of final site or landscape plans by the appropriate Town reviewing body shall comply with the following requirements and condit ions of approval: a. The applicant sha ll, within ninety (90) days of final approval or prior to issuance of a grading or building permit, whichever occurs first , secure an appraisal of the condition and value of all trees included in the tree report affected by the development that are required to remain within the development using the Tree Value Standard methodology as set forth in this Chapter. The appraisal of each tree shall recognize the location of the tree in the proposed development. The appraisal shall be performed in accordance with the current edition of the Guide for Plant Appraisal published by the Council of Tree and Landscape Appraisers (CTLA) and the Species and Group Classification Guide published by the Western Chapter of the International Society of Arboriculture . The appraisal shall be performed at the applicant's expense , and the appraisal shall be subject to the Director's approval. b. The site or landscape plans shall indicate which trees are to be removed . However, the plans do not constitute approval to remove a tree until a separate permit is granted. The property owner or applicant shall obtain a protected tree removal permit, as outlined in section 29.10 .0980, for each tree to be removed to satisfy the purpose of this division . Site Address: 16982 Kennedy Road . Lots 8 & 9. Los Gms. CA Registered Member. American Society of Consulting ArbOtiats and Member of the lntemdonal Society of ArbOtiCIAture 10 Walter Lellison 2016 All Rig,ts ReseNed 22 of37 Version : 8/1 712016 ~jh Walter Levison rl C 0 N S U L T I N G A R B 0 R I S T ASCA Registered Consulting Arborist #401/ISA Tree Risk Assessment Qualified /ISA Certified Arborist #1/VC-3172 '\\ ~~~ .............. u.·..: ......... ·--······-----· .. cell (415) 203-0990 I drtree@sbcglobal.net (d) Prior to acceptance of proposed development or subdivision improvements, the developer shall submit to the Director a final tree preservation report prepared by a certified or consulting arborist. This report shall consider all trees that were to remain within the development. The report shall note the trees' health in relation to the initially reported condition of the trees and shall note any changes in the trees' numbers or physical conditions . The applicant will then be responsible for the loss of any tree not previously approved for removal. For protected trees , which were removed , the developer shall pay a penalty in the amount of the appraised value of such tree in addition to replacement requirements contained in section 29.10.0985 of this Code. The applicant shall remain responsible for the health and survival of all trees within the development for a period of five (5) years following acceptance of the public improvements of the development or certificate of occupancy. (e) Prior to issuance of any demolition, grading or building permit, the applicant or contractor shall submit to the Building Department a written statement and photographs verifying that the required tree protection fence is installed around street trees and protected trees in accordance with the tree preservation report. (f) If required by the Director and conditioned as part of a discretionary approval, a security guarantee shall be provided to the Town. Prior to the issuance of any permit allowing construction to begin, the applicant shall post cash , bond or other security satisfactory to the Director, in the penal sum of five thousand dollars ($5,000.00) for each tree required to be preserved, or twenty-five thousand dollars ($25 ,000.00), whichever is less. The cash, bond or other security shall be retained for a period of one (1) year following acceptance of the public improvements for the development and shall be forfeited in an amount equal to five thousand dollars ($5,000.00) per tree as a civil penalty in the event that a tree or trees required to be preserved are removed, destroyed or severely damaged. (g) An applicant with a proposed development which requires underground utilities shall avoid the installation of said utilities within the dripline of existing trees whenever possible. In the event that this is unavoidable , all trenching shall be done using directional boring , air-spade excavation or by hand, taking extreme caution to avoid damage to the root structure. Work within the dripline of existing trees shall be supervised at all times by a certified or consulting arborist. (h) It shall be a violation of this division for any property owner or agent of the owner to fail to comp ly with any development approval condition concerning preservation, protection, and maintenance of any protected tree . (Ord . No. 2114, §§I , II , 8-4-03) Sec. 29.10.1005. Protection of trees during construction. (a) Protective tree fencing shall specify the following : (1) Size and materials . Six (6) foot high chain link fencing, mounted on two-inch diameter galvanized iron posts , shall be driven into the ground to a depth of at least two (2) feet at no more than 10-foot spacing. For paving area that will not be demolished and when stipulated in a tree preservation plan, posts may be supported by a concrete base. (2) Area type to be fenced . Type 1: Enclosure with chain link fencing of either the entire dripline area or at the tree protection zone (TPZ), when specified by a certified or consulting arborist. Type II : Enclosure for street trees located in a planter strip: chain link fence around the entire planter strip to the outer branches. Type Ill: Protection for a tree located in a small planter cutout only (such as downtown): orange plastic fencing shall be wrapped around the trunk from the ground to the first branch with 2-inch wooden boards bound securely on the outside. Caution shall be used to avoid damaging any bark or branches. (3) Duration of Type I, II , Ill fencing . Fencing shall be erected before demolition, grading or construction permits are issued and remain in Site Addre ss: 16982 Kennedy Road . Lots 8 & 9. Los Gatos, CA Registered Member, American Soci ety of Consulting Arborisls and Member of the International Society of Arboriculture ©Waller Levi son 2016 All Rights Rese.....,(l 23 of 37 Versi on: 8/1712016 ~jh Walter Levison rl CONSU LT IN G AR B O RI ST ASCA Registered Consulting Arborist #401 liSA Tree Risk Assessment Qualified /ISA Certified Arborist #\h/C-3172 /\._\ ~~~ ............ ...,... ..... ---·~ ·-..._ __ .... cell (415) 203-0990 I drtree@sbcglobal.net place until the work is completed. Contractor shall first obtain the approval of the project arborist on record prior to removing a tree protection fence. (4) Warning sign . Each tree fence shall have prominently displayed an 8.5 x 11-inch sign stating : 'Warning-Tree Protection Zone-this fence shall not be removed and is subject to penalty according to Town Code 29.10.1 025". (b) All persons , shall comply with the following precautions: (1) Prior to the commencement of construction , install the fence at the dripline , or tree protection zone (TPZ) when specified in an approved arborist report, around any tree and/or vegetation to be retained which could be affected by the construction and prohibit any storage of construction materials or other materials , equipment cleaning , or parking of veh icles w ithin the TPZ. The dripline shall not be altered in an y way so as to increase the encroachment of the construction . (2) Prohibit all construction activities within the TPZ, including but not limited to: excavation , grad ing , drainage and leveli ng within the dripline of the tree unless approved by the Director. (3) Prohibit disposal or depositing of oil , gasoline, chemicals or other harmful materials within the dripline of or in drainage channels, swales or areas that may lead to the dripline of a protected tree. (4) Prohibit the attachment of wires , signs or ropes to any protected tree . (5) Design utility services and irrigation lines to be located outside of the dripline when feas ible . (6) Retain the services of a certified or consulting arborist who shall serve as the project arborist for periodic monitoring of the project site and the health of those trees to be preserved. The project arborist shall be present whenever activities occur which may pose a potential threat to the health of the trees to be preserved and shall document all site visits . (7) The Director and project arborist shall be notified of any damage that occurs to a protected tree during construction so that proper treatment may be administered . (Ord. No. 2114, §§I, II , 8-4-03) Sec. 29.10.1010. Pruning and maintenance. All pruning shall be in accordance with the current version of the International Society of Arboriculture Bes t Management Practices-Tree Prun ing and ANSI A300-Part 1 Tree, Shrub and Other Woody Plant Management-Standard Practices , (Pruning ) and any special conditions as determ ined by the Director. For developments, which require a tree preservation report, a certif ied or consulting arborist shall be in reasonable charge of all activities involving protected trees , including pruning , cabling and any other work if specified. (1) Any public utility installing or maintaining any overhead wires or underground pipes or conduits in the vicinity of a protected tree shall obtai n permission from the Director before performing any work , including pruning , which may cause injury to a protected tree . (e.g. cable TV/fiber optic trenching , gas, water, sewer trench , etc.). (2) Pruning for clearance of utility lines and energized conductors shall be performed in compliance with the current version of the America n National Standards Institute (ANSI) A300 (Part 1)-Prun ing , Section 5.9 Utility Pruning. Using spikes or gaffs when pruning , except where no other alternative is ava ilable, is prohibited. Site Address: 16982 Kennedy Road. Lots 8 & 9 . Los Gatos. C A Registered Member. American Society of Consulting Att>orists 8nd Member of the I nternational Society of Att>oriculture C> Walter Levison 2016 AI Rights Reserved 24 of37 Version: 8/17/2016 ~jh Walter Levison rl C 0 N S U L T I N G A R B 0 R I S T I~ ~}A ............. .,. ....... ·-.... ,_ .... _._, .. ASCA Registered Consulting Arborist #40111SA Tree Risk Assessment Qualified liSA Certified Arborist fANC-3172 cell (415) 203-0990 I drtree@sbcglobal.net (3} No person shall prune, trim, cut off, o r perform any work, on a single occasion or cumulatively, over a three-year period, affecting twenty-five percent or more of the crown of any protected tree without first obtaining a permit pursuant to this division except for pollarding of fruitless mulberry trees (Morus alba) or other species approved by the Town Arborist. Applications for a pruning permit shall include photographs indicating where pruning is proposed. (4) No person shall remove any Heritage tree or large protected tree branch or root through pruning or other method greater than four (4) inches in diameter (12 .5" in circumference) without first obtaining a permit pursuant to this division. (Ord. No. 2114, §§ I, II , 8-4-03) 8.0 Tree Replacement Standards -Los Gatos Town Code (Excerpted from Town Code 29.10.0985 and 29.10.0987} (1) Two (2) or more replacement trees , of a species and size designated by the Director, shall be planted on the subject private property. Table 3-1 The Tree Canopy-Replacement Standard shall be used as a basis for this requirement. The person requesting the permit shall pay the cost of purchasing and planting the replacement trees . (2) If a tree or trees cannot be reasonably planted on the subject property, an in-lieu payment in an amount set forth by the Town Council by resolution shall be paid to the Town Tree Replacement Fund to: a. Add or replace trees on public property in the vic inity of the subject property; or b. Add or replace trees or landscaping on other Town property; or c. Support the Town 's urban forestry management program. (Ord. No. 2114, §§I, II, 8-4-03} Table 3-1 -Tree Canopy-Replacement Standard -------------------------------·------- (Staff is using 24" box size as Canopy Size of Removed Tree 1 I the Replacement Standard fo SFR Projects as of 2016) 2•4 1 0 feet or less Two 24 inch box trees Single Family Residential Replacement3•4 Two 15 gallon trees ! I ----------------- t . More than 1 0 feet to 25 feet ! Three 24 inch box trees ----------------------- Four 24 inch box More than 25 feet to 40 feet trees ; or Two 36 inch box trees Site Address: 16982 Kennedy Road, Lots 8 & 9 , Los Gatos. CA Registered Member. American Society of Consulting Arborists and Member of the International Society of Alboricutture <0 Watter Lellison 2016 All Rights Reserved 25of37 Three 15 gallon trees Four 15 gallon trees Version: 8/1712016 ~jh Walter Levison rl CONSU LT ING A RB O RIS T ''-\ ~}}... ,.. __ ... , ........ ... ·-· ...... , ___ ... ASCA Registered Consulting Arborist #401/ISA Tree Risk Assessment Qualified /ISA Certified Arborist #VVC-3172 cell (415) 203-0990 I drtree@sbcglobal.net Notes More than 40 feet to 55 feet Six 24 inch box trees; or Three 36 inch box trees Not Available l-------------·--1""-------------t----------------, I Ten 24 inch box J i Greater than 55 feet trees; or Five 36 Not Available I L inch box trees _ _ ____________________ _j 1To measure an asymmetrical canopy of a tree , the widest measurement shall be used to determine canopy size . 2otten, it is not possible to replace a single large , older tree with an equivalent tree(s). In this case , the tree may be replaced with a combinat ion of both the Tree Canopy Replacement Standard and in-lieu payment in an amount set forth by Town Council resolution paid to the Town Tree Replacement Fund . 3Single Family Residential Replacement Option is available for developed single fam ily residential lots under 10 ,000 square feet that are not subject to the Town's Hillside Development Standards and Guidelines. All 15-gallon trees must be planted on-site. Any in-lieu fees for single family residential shall be based on 24" box tree rates as adopted by Town Council. 4Replacement Trees shall be approved by the Town Arborist and shall be of a species suited to the available planting location, proximity to structures, overhead clearances, soil type, compatibility with surrounding canopy and other relevant factors . Replacement with native species shall be strongly encouraged . Replacement requirements in the Hillsides shall comply with the Hillside Development Standards and Guidelines Appendix A and Section 29 .10.0987 Special Provisions-Hillsides. Sec. 29.10.0987. Special Provisions-Hillsides The Town of Los Gatos recognizes its hillsides as an important natural resource and sensitive habitat which is also a key component of the Town 's identity , character and charm . In order to maintain and encourage restoration of the hillside environment to its natural state, the Town has established the following special provisions for tree removal and replacement in the hillsides: (1) All protected trees located 30 or more feet from the primary residence that are removed shall be replaced with native trees listed in Appendix A Recommended Native Trees for Hillside Areas of the Town of Los Gatos Hillside Development Standards and Guidelines (HDS&G). (2) All protected trees located within 30 feet of the primary residence that are removed shall be replaced as follows : (a) If the removed tree is a native tree listed in Appendix A of the HDS&G, it shall only be replaced with a native tree listed in Appendix A of the HDS&G. (b) If the removed tree is not listed in Appendix A, it may be replaced with a tree listed in Appendix A, or replaced with another species of Site Address: 16982 Kennedy Road . Lots 8 & 9 . Los Gatos. CA Registered Member. American Society of Consulting Art>olists •nd Member of the tntern.tONII Society of Art>oliculture e Walter Levison 2016 An Rights Reserved 26 of37 Version: 811712016 ~jh Walter Levison rl CO NSU L T I NG AR BORI S T ASCA Registered Consulting Arborist #401 l iSA Tree Risk Assessment Qualified liSA Certified Arborist #WC-3172 tree as approved by the Director. (c) Replacement trees listed in Appendix A may be planted anywhere on the property. (d) Replacement trees not listed in Appendix A may only be planted within 30 feet of the primary residen ce . I~ ~}A ........ ~ ..... .,. .... --... ·-·--·· cell (415) 203-0990 I drtree@sbcglobal.net (3) Replacement requirements shall comply with the requirements in Table 3-1 Tree Canopy Replacement Standard of this Code. (4) Property owners should be encouraged to retain dead or declining trees where they do not pose a safety or fire hazard , in order to foster wildlife habitat and the natural renewal of the hillside environment. 9.0 Author's Quali fi cations • Continued education through The American Society of Consulting Arborists, The International Society of Arboriculture (Western Chapter}, and various governmental and non-governmental entities. • Contract Town Arborist, Town of Los Gatos, California Community Development Department I Planning Division 2015-present • Tree Risk Assessment Qualified (ISA TRAQ Course Graduate, Palo Alto , California) • Millbrae Community Preservation Commission (Tree Board ) 2001-2006 • ASCA Registered Consulting Arborist #401 • ASCA Arboriculture Consulting Academy graduate, class of 2000 • Associate Consulting Arborist Barrie D. Coate and Associates 4/99-8/99 • Contract City Arborist, City of Belmont, California Planning and Community Development Department 5/99-present • ISA Certified Arborist tNVC-3172 • Peace Corps Soil and Water Conservatio n Extension Agent Chiangmai Province, Thailand 1991-1993 Site Address: t6982 Kennedy Road. Lots 8 & 9, Los Gatos . CA Registerad Member, American Society of Consulting Art>ori sts and Member of the International Society ot Art>oriculture Cl Walter Lelltson 2016 All Rights Reserved 27 of37 Ve rsion: 81171201 6 ~))J Walter Levison CO NSULTING ARBORIST ASCA Registered Consulting Arborist #401 l iSA Tree Risk Assessment Qualified liSA Certified Arborist #\NC-3172 • B.A. Environmental Studies/Soil and Water Resources UC Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, California 1990 (My full curriculum vitae is available upon request) 10.0 Assumptions and Limiting Conditions ~~ '~= ;; :.::. -......-.:.:.:..~ .. ce ll ( 415) 203-0990 I drtree@sbcglobal. net Any legal description provided to the consultant/appraiser is assumed to be correct. Any titles and ownershi p to any property are assumed to be good and market able. No responsibility is assumed for matters legal in character. Any and all property is appraised and evaluated as through free and clean, under responsible ownership and competent management. It is assumed that any property is not in violation of any applicable codes, ordinance, statutes, or other government regulations. Care has been taken to obtain all information from reliable sources. All data has been verified insofar as possible; however, the consultant/appraiser can neither guarantee nor be responsible for the accuracy of information provided by others. The consultant/appraiser shall not be required to give testimony or to attend court by reason of this report unless subsequent contractual arrangements are made, including payment of an additional fee for such services as described in the fee schedule and contract of engagement. Unless required by law otherwise, the possession of this report or a copy thereof does not imply right of public ation or use for any other purpose by any other than the person to whom it is addressed , without the prior expressed written or verbal consent of the consultant/appraiser. Unless required by law otherwise. neither all nor any part of the contents of this report. nor copy thereof, shall be conveyed by anyone , including the client. to the public through advertising , publi c relations. news , sales, or other media. without the prior expressed conclusions , i dentity of the consultant/appra iser, or any reference to any professional society or institute or to any initiated designation conferred upon the consultant/appraiser as stated in his qualifications . This report and any values expressed herein represent the opinion of the consultant/appraiser. and the consultant'slappraiser's fee is in no way contingent upon the re porting of a specified value . a stipulated result. the occurrence of a subsequent event, nor upon any finding to be reported . Sketches. drawings, and photographs in this report . being intended for visual aids. are not necessarily to scale and should not be construed as engineering or arc hitectural reports or surveys unless expressed otherwise. The reproduction of any information generated by engineers , architects , or other consultants on any sketches, drawings, or photog raphs is for the express purpose of coordination and ease of reference only . Inclusion of said information on any drawings or other documents does not constitute a representation by W alter Levison to the sufficiency or accuracy of said information. Unless expressed otherwise: a. information contained in this report covers only those items that were examined and reflects the conditions of those items at the time of inspection; and b . the inspection is limited to visual examination of accessible items without dissect ion, excav at ion, probing , or coring . There is no warranty or gua rantee, expressed or implied , that problems or deficiencies of the plants or property in question may not arise in the future . Loss or alteration of any part of this report invalidates the entire report. Arborist Disclosure Statement Arborists are tree specialists who use their education, knowledge, training , and experience to examine trees, re co mmend measures to enhance the beauty and health of trees , and attempt to reduce the risk of living near trees . Clients may choose to accept or disregard the recommendations of the arborist, or to seek additional advi ce. Arborists cannot detect every condition that could possibly lead to the structural failure of a tree. Tree are living organisms that fail in ways we do not fully understand. Conditions are often hidden within trees and below ground. Arborist cannot guarantee that a tree will be healthy or safe under all circumstances, or for a specified period of time. Likewise , remedial treatments, like any medicine, cannot be guaranteed. Site Address: 16982 Kennedy Road. Lots 8 & 9. Los Gatos. CA Registered Member. American Society of Consulting Arborists and Member of the International Society of Arboriculture C> Walter Levison 2016 All Rights Reserved 28 of37 Version: 8/17/2016 ~jh Walter Levison rl C 0 N S U l T IN G A R 8 0 R I S T '\~ ~}~ ... :;.:-~~ .. ~~:: ASCA Registered Consulting Arborist #401 /ISA Tree Risk Assessment Qualified /ISA Certified Arborist #WC-3172 cell (415) 203-0990 I drtree@sbcglobal.net Treatment. pruning, and removal of trees may involve considerations beyond the scope of the arborist's services such as property boundaries, property ownership, site lir.es , disputes between neighbors , and other issues. Arborists cannot take such considerations into account unless complete and accurate information is disclosed to the arborist. An arborist should then be expected to reasonably rely upon the completeness and accuracy of the Information provided . Trees can be managed, but they cannot be controlled. To live near trees is to accept some degree of risk. The only way to eliminate all risk associated with trees is to eliminate the trees . 11.0 Certification I hereby certify that all the statements of fact in this report are true. complete , and correct to the best of my kno~edge and belief, and are made in good faith . Signature of Consultant ~ 12.0 Digital Images WLCA archived images of survey trees on 8/12/2016. The following is a set of images that covers all of the survey tree specimens discussed in this CTA report. LtoR 1 & 2 Site Address: 16982 Kemedy Road, Lot s 8 & 9, Los Gatos, CA Registerad Member. Ameri can Sodety of Cons<iting Alt>oriats and Member of the International Sodety of AltloriaAture C Walter Levison 2016 All Ri~s Reserwd 29of 37 Ve~on : 8117120 16 ~Jh Walter Levi son rl C 0 N S U L T I N G A R B 0 R I S T ASCA Registered Consulting Arborist #401 /ISA Tree Risk Assessment Qualified /ISA Certified Arborist tNVC-3172 2 4 Site Address : 16 982 Kennedy Road, Lots 8 & 9, Los Gatos, CA Registlfad Member. American Society of ConsiAting Arbo<ists and Member of the tntwnatiOMI Society ol ArborictAture C> Walter Levi son 201 6 AI Riglts Reserved 5 30 of37 '~ -~lt~;. cell (415) 203-0990 I drtree@sbcglobal.net Version: 811712016 ~jh Walter Levison rl C 0 N S U l T I N G A R B 0 R I S T ASCA Regis tered Consulting Arborist #401 /ISA Tree Risk Assessment Qualified /ISA Certified Arborist tNVC-3172 6 10 Site Address: 16982 Kennedy Road, lots 8 & 9 , los Gatos, CA Registered Member, American Society of Consulting Arborista and Member of the tntermotional Society of ArboricoJture C> Walter lellison 2016 Alt Rights Reserved 7 11 31 of 37 ~~ #it~. cell ( 415 ) 203-0990 I drtree@sbcglobal.net Version: 811712016 ~J~ ~~!~~r.N~~~ig~~ ASCA Registered Consulting Arborist #401 liSA Tree Risk Assessment Qualified liSA Certified Arborist #WC-3172 11 12 Site Address: 16982 Kennedy Roed. Lots 8 & 9. Loa Gatos. CA Registered Member. American Society of Consulting Arbortsts and Member of the International Society of AtboriCIJture c Walter Levison 2016 All Rights ReMrwd 12 13 32 of 37 JJ\ ................ _ ... -.. ,.. -·-----·~ cell (415) 203-0990 I drtree@sbcglobal.net Version: 8/17/2016 .8 E :I z "' .. 1- ~ 1- 1 2 ~J~ Walter Levison CO N SU LT ING A AB O RI S T ASCA Registered Consulting Arborist #401 liSA Tree Risk Assessment Qualified liSA Certified Arborist tNVC-3172 13.0 Tree Data Table ... ... ... ... >. "' ~ ~ .! c c. c .. 2 0 ;: Ove111ll c .. _ E E E 1-.,_ 111:.<:; Genus & Common .. .. .. =I!! 0.; -U Condition i5 i5 i5 ... oel!• Species Name ~s o(l-Rating ::>w ... S:! ... _..., ... ... 0 .. .<: .. .<:-..,t (0 to 100%) c c c E i .2'! ~2o 2 2 2 ::>-GIQ. .,_o 1-1-1-1/)Q J:IJ) XCI)::.. LOT9 Cedrus Deodar 36.1 - - 36.1 66/40 86176 80%Good cedar deodara LOT9 Deodar Cedrus cedar 37.2 --37.2 66/40 aono n%Good deodara Site Address : 16982 Kennedy Road, Lots 8 & 9, Los Gatos , CA Registered Member, American Sodety of Consulting Art>orists and Me-of the International S odety of Arboriruture ®Walter Levison 201 6 All Rights Reserved 4i' '0-, jfi.!! I ~ s u,; ¥ I ~ ;:-.B !5 ~ ~d!lj •<'"'" 0 0 e-:1:: '0 : ~~~fi' X X 33 of 37 ..., .! ~fi'f ~)(~0 0 w .. 3: €~~'i ~~E!! J;EOGI _J:Qi: Severe (depends on actual irrigation pipe trenching, sump pump lnflltllltlon box, se-rplpe trench, gas and electric trenching on lot a, etc.) Moderate to Severe (depends on actual irrigation pipe trenching, sump pump Infiltration box, sewer pipe trench, drlvewsy base section cut depth, etc.) A\ ~~~ ... _.,, ................ . .. -. ... , ... _ ... _ ....... ... cell (415) 203-0990 I drtree@sbcglobal.net >. 8'--1/) w i .~ c ~ ..., zi! 0 z 0 fit~~ Q Ou c:• 0 8 w oc z 0 = e Ill: 'a fi s 1-B~ < i= i .~ z "' Ill: c .. u 0 1/) w 01/) ..J ·-COcnc:Z ~1-I!!W ........ ..., .5 "'C 1-l!!w -.; .. ... .. CIJCGGt'-c_ =e ·!! ~ ;;;:::.! gg~ffi:; ~coo a.c; :I 0 <z~~~:o 0 c ... c 5 :I ... :c~o _._ .... _ IDO 11)111:0.. ... ~ :E<o..o Good live TB,RPZ,W, twig and relocate density and a number of extension. Items shown Multiple on current Items Per the proposed proposed CTA's plan sheet on s heetC-map in C-2 that are 2wlll potentially this currently to destroy a report. be Installed be~en large ze ro feet percentage and 30 feet of the offset from tree's root trunk edge. system. TB,RPZ,W, and relocate a number of Items s hown on current proposed Good live plan sheet twig C-2 that are density and currently to extension. be Installed Multiple Per the be~en Items CTA's zero feet proposed map in and 20 feet on sheetC-this offset fro m 2wlll report. trunk edge. potentially Impact the Minimize cut tree root for new system. drlvewsy base course (e .g.4 Inches below existing g r ade). Version: 8/1712016 ~ § z "' ~ .. ~ ... 3 4 6 6 7 8 9 ~J~ Walter Levison C ONSULTING ARBORI S T ASCA Registered Consulting Arborist #401 /ISA Tree Risk Assessment Qualified liSA Certified Arborist tN-/C-3172 Genus & Species LOT9 P/cn pun gens "Giauca' LOT9 Cupressus sp. LOT9 Betula pendula LOTB Nlagnollax sou/angeana LOTB Magnolia grand/flora (non- regulated fruit tree noted In applicant's arborist letter report. (non- regulated queen palm noted In applicant's arborist letter report). Common Name Colorado blue spruce Cedar species not verified (applicant's arborlst noted this tree as an Europ81n birch Saucer magnolia Southern magnolia ... ~ !i 2i ~ ~ 10.9 12.2 7.7 7.7 11.7 ... ~ !i 2i S:! c:: ~ 7.0 ... ~ !i 2i ~ c:: ~ 6.7 Site Address: 16982 Kennedy Road, Lots 8 & 9, Los Gatos. CA ... c:: :I ~ = .. 4('--.! 0 .. E i ,._ (/)Q 10.9 12.2 21.4 7.7 11.7 f .,_ u...: a.. oe-_., """' .2'~ ..... J:Ul 36/16 26120 46126 20/16 26120 01 c:: ~-It:&. -u oel!~ ""~"' =!.! ... '"C:c ~a;~ 80/66 36/36 56166 80130 80180 OWrall Condition Rating (Oto 100%) 73% Good 35% Poor 56% Fair 45% Poor 80% Good Registered Member, American Society of Consulting Art>orists and Member of the lntematiONI Society of Art>orietAture ©Walter Levison 2016 All Rights Reserved .; "C • .., t' li.!! # ~ ,;¥ j;:-,g~~ 0 Q. ~ .. '-.t:..ns GH'•·oEo !:h ~io _. .... Nta• 34 ol37 I X X X X X ., .! ¥c:: ... ........ ---)(~0 0 w .. 3: ~ .. :=., ·c:: tl (/) .. •«~e1i l~g~ To be removed per applicant's proposed LOT 9 grading plan. To ba removed per applicant's proposed LOT 9 grading plan. To be removed per applicant's proposed LOT 9 grading plan. To be removed per applicant's proposed LOT 8 grading plan. To be removed per applicant's proposed LOT 8 grading plan. >o a. o-c:: c:: .. 0 u;: ,u 'i .r: .,., u; .. g.-o ...JS J~ ":::.~:: :.;'.!"'.;i.:..~.:.:.~ .. cell (415) 203-0990 I drtree@sbcglobal.net c:: .2 c::-:! ...J:a ..... c::o 2 c:: ... _ ~ It: 01 .: 'E G X g It: 'OC:: ·! ~ :I ... mu ., ; .. ~ ·! ; :d~~ .~!!"'"'"" .. ::.! a:t-~-a.oa.o Tree appears to be infected with cypress canker. One7" diameter girdling root noted. (/) c z2 Ill QO t;; t;~ Ill ww l.!ll-1-u ~t!IOOz--: Oct:w~ It: G. a..- Version: 8/17/2016 w u z z Q 4( ... ffi ucn 1-l!!w !:coo oCzct:O :::Eoo(G.U ! E ~ z 1:11 .. .... .. ! .... 10 11 ~~ Walter Levison CO NSU LT ING ARBORIST ASCA Registered Consulting Arborist #401 liSA Tree Risk Assessment Qualified /ISA Certified Arborist tNVC -3172 ... ... ... ... ~ 1:11 .. ~ .. c c • • ~ 0 Own! II i i !i ... c ~'E: .... ·-Genua & Common =I!! u.; -u Condition Spec lea Name 2i 2i 2i ..: . .,~ oat!• Ratlfl9 .... ~ .., ... ---o ~w 0. z:-';/. (0 to 100%) ... ... .t:;ll c c c E !i .5!'! i 2o 2 2 2 ~-• Q. ·-0 .... .... .... VIC J:VI Z(l)~ C1llfomla bay laurel or Grecl•n l•urel (this tree noted by •ppUc•nra arboristu cooking bay I.OT& (Laurus Umbu/lularla ca/lfom/ca nob//ls). 4 3 2 9 36115 16165 75•4 Good orLaurus Species not no bills 100% verified, u these two trees can In aomec•••• be almost ldentiCIIIn terms of foliar mo rpholOGY . I.OT& Sequoia Coast Eat semperv/rens redwood Eet45 - -45 96145 60/40 50% F1lr (NEIGHBOR TREE) - Site Address: 16982 Kennedy Road. Lots 8 & 9 . Los Gatos. CA Registered Member. American Society of Consulting Arborists and Meni>er of the International Society of Arboricutture C> Walter Levison 2016 Aft Rights Reserved ., . I j'li.! I u.;¥ I ;:::-.& IS :- £~i1~ • c-~ ~ ~!~ ~= -'1-NIO; ? X 35 of37 '0 >-.. g._ t> &i~ c c .. .2 ~Ma::::o j~ ow .. :it f~iiii: '0'0 ... ~ l e:; 0.() • Eo • Oc Vl-.t:a:: ..... _ Moderate to Severe (or remove tree). Treels loeeted In an •re• where proposed trenching will occur. It Ia not clear If the tree wiD be able to be retained. Minor to Moderate. TrM 1pp .. 111to be approximately 17 to 1 a linear feet offset from the ne1reat proposed trench work (see tree maplnthla report). Irrigation on our aide of the tree's root ayatem wiD help mitigate aome root d1mage. ~~ ~}\. ,.. __ ..... """ ...... ·-.. ··-·--· .. cell (415) 203-0990 I drtree@sbcglobal.net -VI c J!! '0 z:! 0 8 ; .. 0 c;: 0 w oo .. ¥ a:: 0 '0 -.. .... ~~ .. ... a:: c.,go VI ....I:O 1:11 ... z w ww c ~i .... ~ ., .. ~ ~81-<.J..., c_ •::.! ~ Oz . ~ 0 ... 0 ... c i3 ~ ... crs.to =-a::w-.... _ ID<.J VIII::ILIL~ Per the CTA's mepln this report (If tree Ia to be retained) Poor to moden1te live twig denalty and extension. Aa noted at left, lrrlgstlon Per the during CT A 's conatructlo n will help mapln mitlg1te this some report d•m•gedto the root zone on the 16912 Kennedy aide of the tree'a root zone. Version: 8/1712016 w (.J z z 0 ..: i= ~ (.JVI 1-l!!w a!: co o ..:za::o :::li!<(IL<.J (If retained) RPZ,W, TB, 1nd modify proposed drain trench 1llgnment If tree t o be retained . Use over- grade Irrig at i on piping o nly, auch •• Neteftm 'Ia" dlamster emitter line. I I I W, RPZ. and limit trenchi ng on 1 ourside of the property line fence which Is North aide of the tree's I root zone. i E " z "' ~ ~ ~ 12 13 ~J~ Walter Levison CONSU LT ING A RB OR I ST ASCA Registered Consulting Arborist #401 liSA Tree Risk Assessment Qualified liSA Certified Arborist fflC-3172 Genua & Spec: I .. LOT9 Cedrus deodllr (NEIGHBOR TREE) LOT9 Quercus agrtfofla Common Name Deodar cedar Coast live oak (Thla tree w.snot noted In the applicant' a arborlat letter report. ... ~ ~ i5 ... ... c: ~ Eat. 35 6.0 ... ~ i i5 ~ c: 2 ~ ... ~ j Q ~ c: ~ Site Address: 16982 Kennedy Road, LoiS 8 & 9 , Loa Gatos. CA ... § j::. ~ E o• E ~ ~0 Eat. 35 6.0 ~ 0 c: "'~ u..: ... oll- .c"i .2'! •a. J:U) 65155 20/10 "' c: :::0 ~~ -u .. .. oll'-w ~~~ =llo •co :!en:. 90180 90/65 Overall Condition Rating (0 tD 100%) 80%Good n%Good Registered Member, AmeliC*'I Society of Consulting Atborista and Meni!er of 1M lntemationel Society of AtboriciAture C> Wtlter Levison 2016 All Rights ReseMid ~ . ... : ) "i-~ ,;¥ 1='~5: filL -........ .... :..p; &~ o eo i !~ ~: ........... ; X ? 36 of37 1 !!!;~ a._ 0 olllC:~ ~·=-.:~ 'l:l)cn~ •'" E'" >a.o• ~.Eo~: a:: Minor to Moderate. Thlstreew.a a .. esaedfrom afar due to lack of access through the rear unlt'a locked aide gat ... Tree appears to be 10 to 12feat offset from the nearest proposed work. Moderate to Severe (tree may end up being a removal). Proposed atorm drain trench edge alignment Ia just 1 to 3 feet offset from trunk edge of this tree. Irrigation pipe trenching may be propoaed for this area, If It Ia not to be set with over- grade 'Ia" diameter NetAiflm drip emitter lines. ~ o~ c: c: ca.2 j~ :5!'6 ... a.-0 0 ..JS '\\ .I.J~. cell (415) 203-0990 I drtree@sbcglobal.net c: .2 .,-:! .J:; ... .. 2g ~- J "' .E =e 6 8 0:: ~ i ... 0 " ... IDU '0 ; .. , .. ~ c.~ 0 .. .,.cz !! ...... .. ::.! .forl:o Excellent live twig density and extension. Proposed graaay aw.leand permeable paver work wtn have an unknown total negative ef'fsct on the tree'• root system. Excellent live twig denalty and extension. Lo-r malnatem exhibits a severe "dogleg" bend which reduces atructural rating. II) 0 z2 I~ 5~ ww ~~u Ooz., ;:,Oo::wu: Di:ILU.- Per the CTA's map in this report. Per the CTA's map in this report (If tree Is to be retAil ned) Version: 8/1712016 w u z z 0 "' -z ~ W Ucn ~ ~w :!:coo czo::o ::I!CILU W , RPZ,and limit trenching and excavation depths to (ldeally4 Inches, or max.& Inches) below exi sting surface grade elevation, on our aide of the property line fence, which Ia North side ofthetrH'a root zone. (If reulned) 18,RPZ, and realign the proposed atormdraln pipe alignment If tree Is to be retAil ned. Use over- grade Irrigation piping only, such as Netaflm 'Ia " diameter emitter line. ~Jb Walter Levison r CO NSU LT IN G ARBORIST ASCA Registered Consulting Arborist #401 /ISA Tree Risk Asses sment Qualified /ISA Certified Arborist tNVC-3172 Tree Maintenance and Protection Codes Used in Data Table: ~~ ~~~ ~--.... _. ....... . ·-···-... --. cell (41 5) 203-0990 I drtree@sbcglobal.net RPZ: Root protection zone fence , chain link , with 2" diameter iron posts driven 24" into the ground , 6 to 8 feet on center max. spacing . Alternative material: chain link fence panels set over concrete block-type footings , with the fence panels wired to steel pins pounded 24 inches into the ground at both ends of each panel. RB : Root buffer consisting of wood chip mulch lain over existing soil as a 12 inch thick layer, overlain with 1 in ch or greater plywood strapped together with metal plates. This root buffer or soil buffer should be placed over the entire width of the construction corridor between tree trunks and construction. RP : Root pruning. Prune woody roots measuring greater than or equal to 1 inch diameter by carefully back-digging in to the soil a round each root using small hand tools until an area is reached where the root is undamaged. Cleanly cut through the root at right angle to the root growth d irection , u sing professional grade pruning equipment and/or a Sawzall with wood pruning blade. Backfill around the cut root immediately (s ame day), and thoroughly irr igate the area to saturate the uppermost 24 i nches of the soil profile. BDRP: Back-dig root pruning: Hand-dig around t he broken root , digging horizontally into the open soil root zone until a clean , unbroken , unshattered section of the root is visible. Proceed as per 'root pruning'. RC X: Root crown excavation . Retain an experienced arborist to perform careful hand-digging using small trowels or other dull d igg in g tools to uncover currently-buried buttress root flares. Digging shall occur between trunk edge and at least two (2) feet horizontal f rom trunk edge. The final soil elevation will be at a le vel such that the tree 's buttress roots visibly flare out from the vert ical trunk. TB : Trun k buffer consists of 20-40 wraps of orange plastic snow fencing to create a 2 inch thick buffer over the lowest 8 feet of tree trunk (usually takes at least an entire roll of orange fencing per each tree). Lay 2X4 wood boards vertic ally , side by side, around the entire ci rcumference of the trunk. Secure buffer using duct tape (not wires). F : Fertilization with slow-release Greenbelt 22-14-14 tree formula , as a soil injection application using a fertilizer injection gun. This b rand and formulation is commonly used by reputable tree care companies in the Bay Area. Apply at label rate and injection hole spacing . M: 4-inch th ick layer of chipper truck type natural wood chips (example source: Lyngso Garden Suppl y, self pick-up). Do not use bark chips or shredded redwood bark. W : Irrigate using various methods to be determined through discussion with General Contractor. Irrigation frequen cy and duration to be determined t hrough discussion and/or per directions in this report. Native oak species typically requi re 1x/month irrigation , wh ile other tree species tend to prefer 2x/month or 4x/month moderate to heavy irrigation during construction. P: Prun ing per specifications noted elsewhere. All pruning must be performed only under d irect site supervision of an ISA Certified Arborist, or performed directly by an ISA Certified Arborist , and shall conform to all current ANSI A300 standards . MON : A Project Arborist must be present to monitor specific work as noted for each tree. Site Address: 16962 Kennedy Road. Lots 6 & 9, Los Gatos, CA Registered Member. American SO<:iely of Consulting Arborists and Member of th e International SO<:iely of Arboriculture e> Walter Levison 2016 All Rights Reserved 37 of37 Version: 6/1712016 Page 1 of3 November 18,2016 Planning Division Comments Response Letter 16982 Kennedy Rd., Los Gatos-APN: 532-35-060 Architecture and Site Application S-16-050 Lot 8 Response to Submittal Deficiencies: I). Label wide trim at gable end vent locati ons on each elevation . Response: The wide trim boards below the thin trim at the gable vent infill have been labeled (2x4 trim laid flat ( 1. 5 " exposed) above a 2x6 trim board (5. 5 " exposed), for a total exposed face of trim at 7 ''). Updated exterior elevations with the callout are attached as .pdf files. 2). Provide line-by-line to Consulting Architect's Lot 8 recommendations. 1. Extend the Living Room forward. Response: The Living Room was extended 1 '-4 " towards the front ofthe lot to address this recommendation. This r evision was included in the 1017116 resubmittal. 2. Add typical wide trim board below thin trim at the gable vent infill Response: Addition of the trim was included in the 1017116 resubmittal, but wasn 't called out until the current resubmit/a/. As per the response to Submittal Deficiency #1 above, the trim is 2x4 trim laid flat (1 .5 " exposed) above a 2x6 trim board (5.5 " exposed), for a total exposedface oftrim of7 ". 3. Use wood or vinyl-over-wood windows to provide wider sashe s typical of the architectural style Response: Exterior elevations have been revised to call out vinyl-over-wood windows. Final selection of window manufacturer to be determined. Updated exterior elevations with the callout are attached as .pdf files . 3). Provide line-by-line to Consulting Arborist's Lot 8 recommendations. (note: this list is out of n u merical sequence because some items apply only to Lot 9. Please refer to the Response Letter provided separately for Lot 9). I. Retain 3rd party ASCA registered consulting arborist or ISA Certified Arborist during co nstruction phase to provide pre-project verification that tree protection and maintenance measures are adhered to , collect periodic data , and report results to Town of Los Gatos Planning staff. EXHIBIT 9 Response: xxx 2. i. Tree Removal in-lieu fees Response: Acknowledged. The developer will pay the tree removal in-lieu fees stipulated in the recommendation. ii. Security bonding Response : Acknowledged. The developer will pay the security bond as surety against inadvertent damage or death to trees during construction. iii. Lot 8 -proposed water meter upgrade to box replacement only Response : xxx iv. Lot 8 -proposed gas and electric trench Response: xxx v . Lot 8 -proposed permeable paver driveway Response: xxx xi. proposed Landscape Irrigation Response: Acknowledged. Irrigation plans were not included with the Design Review submittal, but final Landscape plans submitted for building permit will note that landscape irrigation will reflect the Town's requirement that no-dig flexible piping must be used within 25 ' of the trees being retained. xii. proposed Swale Grading: Response: Acknowledged. Final plans submitted for building permit will note that swale grading in proximity to neighboring trees #11 & #12 is not to exceed 4 " maximum cut below existing soil grade. xiii. Temporary irrigation during construction Response : Acknowledged. Final Landscape plans submitted for building permit will note that temporary irrigation during construction must be supplied to trees #1, #2, #11, and #12 in the amounts and with the frequency indicated in the Consulting Arborist 's recommendation. 3 . Comment pertains to Lot 9 . See separate Response Letter provided. 4. Chain link fencing protection Response: Acknowledged. Final plans submitted for building permit will note that 5' high protective chain link fencing must be erected prior to the start of construction and is to remain in place for the duration of co nstruction around the Root Protection Zone as designated on Sht. C-2. 5. Signage Response: Acknowledged. Final plans submitted for building permit will note that signage for the RPZ fencing will have a posted sign in accordance with the language stipulated as per the exhibit accompanying Consulting Arbor is! 's comment. 6. Temporary irrigation during construction Response: Acknowledged as per item 2.xiii above (sa me co mment). 7. Comment pertains to Lot 9. See separate Response Letter provided. 8. Comment pertains to Lot 9. See separate Response Letter provided. 9. Comment pertains to Lot 9. See separate Respon se Letter provided. Please do not hesitate to call me with any further questions or requests fo r additional information. Sincerely, Mark Thomas Project Manager SDG Architects, Inc. This Page Intentionally Left Blank Page I of 4 November 18 , 20 16 Planning Division Comments R esponse Letter 16982 Kennedy Rd ., Los Gatos -APN: 532-35-060 Architecture and Site Application S-16-051 Lot 9 Response to Submittal Deficiencies: 1. Reduce the front encroachment of the garage, while maintaining the depth of the columns around the garage . Response: Although the structural wall of the garage does not encroach into the front yard setback, the far right pilaster attached to the face of the garage encroaches a total of 10 " into the front yard setback. This was done in response to the Consulting Architect 's recommendation from his comments dated 8/23116, in which he suggested that in an effort to mitigate the presence of the garage door at the front elevation, the garage door be recessed by increasing the depth of the porch and adding columns across th e face of the garage. The porch depth was increased 2 ' to a total of 7 '. The co l umns at the face of the garage align w ith the columns at the fron t p orch. This revision was included in the 1017116 resubmittal set. Pushing the columns, in full alignment with one another, back the ne cessary 10 " will indeed set the far right garage column o ut of the front yard setback line, but doing so will also reduce the depth of the porch by 10 " (to 6'-2 "), which makes the porch more difficult to furnish and therefore less used. This result would defeat the purpose of the porch for creating an opportunity for neighbors to gather outside and casually converse with one another. Even if the columns affixed to the front of the garage do not m eet the technical criteria for a projection (i.e. cantilevered off the structural face of wall), they do at least comply with the spirit of th e intent of an architectural projection for increasing architectural interest and variation on a building elevation, and do so with a minimum amount of encroachment, g iven the language offered by the Cons ulting Architect for architectural projections being allowed into front y ard setbacks to a maximum of 30 ". 2. Provide line-by-line t o Consulting Architect's Lot 9 recommendations. 1. Modify t he front roof dormers to provide a s ingle unified shed dormer, and possibly add an additional small window at the ri ght side. Response: The 2nd s tory gable dormer was retained at the front elevation because it is a strong f o cal elem ent, as the Consulting Archite ct pointe d out in his comment . Th ere was concern that introducing a shed dorm er at the front elevation would dilute the concept of the sheltering roof gable which is pre va lent across all four elevations in this design. In order to mitig ate the Consulting Architect 's valid concern regarding the lack of f enestratio n at this front gable, a matching window was introduced on the left side (this is in the Master dressing room) to create a pair of windows and harmonize the fenestration at the primmy elevation. This revision was included in the I 017 I I6 resubmittal. 2. Avoid designs that allow the garage to dominate the street fa~ade . A. Revise floorplan design and move the garage farther to the rear of the lot Response: This revision was included in the I0/7/I6 resubmittal, which triggered the comment above under Submittal Deficiency #I . Please refer to the response for that itemfor afull discussion of how the developer seeks to resolve the issue. B. Mitigate garage presence by increasing porch depth and adding columns across the fa~ade in front of the garage. Response: Please see response to 2A above. Increase the porch depth and extend the roof overhang at the porch Response: Please see response to 2A above. · 3. Reduce the size of the decorative vent on the left side elevation . Response: The decorative gable end vent on the left elevation was reduced to 213 of its original height in the first DRB submittal. This revision was included in the I0/7/I6 resubmittal. 3. Provide line-by-line to Consulting Arborist's Lot 8 recommendations. (note: this list is out of numerical sequence because some items apply only to Lot 8. Please refer to the Response Letter provided separately for Lot 8). 1. Retain 3rd party ASCA registered consulting arborist or ISA Certified Arborist during construction phase to provide pre -project verification that tree protection and maintenance measures are adhered to, collect periodic data, and report results to Town of Los Gatos Planning staff. Response: Acknowledged. The developer will retain the services of a consulting arborist during the construction phase to ensure that the tree protection measures are implemented and reported to Planning staff on a periodic basis. 2. i. Tree Removal in-lieu fees Response: Acknowledged. The developer will pay the tree removal in-lieu fees stipulated in the recommendation. ii . Security bonding Response: Acknowledged. The developer will pay the security bond as surety against inadvertent damage or death to trees during construction. vi. Lot 9-proposed permeable paver driveway and rear yard paver patio Response: Permeable pavers are being used at the driveway (and all other paved areas), and the driveway conjiguaration was revised to curve and shift to the west to move the paving further away from the edge of the 60 " dia. trunk of the deodar cedar. This revision was included in the 1017 I 16 resubmittal. vii. Lot 9-proposed sewer Response: The sanitary sewer line was relocated from the east side of the lot to the west side of the lot in order to move the line away from the root syst ems of the existing trees. This revision was included in the 1017116 resubmittal. viii, ix, and x. Lot 9-proposed storm drainage in lets and piping, basement sump pump and drai nage lines, drainage infiltration box Response: Th e storm drain system was reconfigured by moving the gravel basin (#20 on Sht. C-2) several feet to the west in order to move itfurther away from the root systems of the existing tree, and out of the area of protective fencing to be erected around the trees during construction. In addition, the basement sump pump lines and drain boxes were relocated outside of the area of protective fencing. The line of protective fencing is indicated on Sht. C-2. Thi s r evision was included in the 10/7/16 resubmittal. xi. proposed Landscape Irrigation Response: Acknowledged. Irrigation plans were not included with the Design Review submittal, but final Landscape plans submitted for building permit will note that landscape irrigation will reflect the Town 's requirement that no-dig flexible piping must be used within 25 ' of the trees be ing retained. xii. proposed Swale Grading: R esponse: Acknowledged. Final plans submitted for building permit will note that swale grading in proximity to neighboring trees #11 & #12 is not to exceed 4 " maximum cut below existing soil grade. xiii. Temporary irrigation during construction Response: Acknowledged. Final Landscape plans submitted for building permit will note that tempormy irrigation during construction must be supplied to trees #1, #2, #11 , and #12 in the amounts and with th e frequency indicated in the Consulting Arborist 's recommendation. 3 . Lot 9-Trunk Buffer Wrap Type III protection Response: Acknowledged. Final Landscape plans submitted for building permit will note that tree buffer wrap protection will be provided for trees #1 and #2 per the specifications indicated in the Consulting Arborist 's comment. 4. Chain link fencing protection Response: Acknowledged. Final plans submitted/or building permit will note that 5' high protective chain /ink fencing must be erected prior to the start of construction and is to remain in place for the duration of construction around the Root Protection Zone as designated on Sht. C-2 . 5. Signage Response: Acknowledged. Final plans submitted for building permit will note that signage for the RPZ fencing will have a posted sign in accordance with the language stipulated as per the exhibit accompanying Consulting Arborist's comment. 6. Temporary irrigation during construction Response: Acknowledged as per item 2.xiii above (same comment). 7. Lot 9 -Pruning. Response: Acknowledged. Final landscape plans submitted for building permit will note that any required pruning must meet the criteria stipulated in the Consulting Arborist 's comment. 8. Lot 9-Root pruning 9. Response: Acknowledged. Final landscape plans submitted for building permit will note that any required root pruning must meet the criteria stipulated in the Consulting Arborist 's comment. I 0. Lot 9-water spray Response: Acknowledged. Final landscape plans submitted for building permit will note foliage of trees within 30' of construction activity will be sprayed of! with a high power water spray to keep leaves unclogged and the trees healthy. Please do not hesitate to call me with any further questions or requests for additional information . Sincerely, Mark Thomas Project Manager SDG Architects , Inc. Date 11/19/16 11/19/16 11/19/16 ·11/19/16 11/19/16 11/19/16 11/19/16 11/19/16 11/19/16 11/19/16 Neighbor Communication 16982 Kennedy Rd Los Gatos Address Name 380 LG Boulevard Sergio 400 LG Boulevard 16998 Kennedy (on the RIGHT looking at property) Theresa 16964 Kennedy (on the LEFT looking at property) Patricia 16952 Kennedy Road Christine 16983 Kennedy Road Brooks 16995 Kennedy Road 25 Fillmer Avenue Mrs Campbell 21 Fillmer Avenue Valerie 15 Fill111er Avenue Kenneth Spoke To? YES NO Left plans and letter with contact info with nanny YES YES YES YES NO Left copy of plans and Jetter with contact info YES YES YES EXHJBIT 1 0 This Page Intentionally Left Blank Azhar Khan From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Cathleen Bannon <cathleenbannon@gmail.com> Monday, March 27, 2017 4 :57 PM Azhar Khan grantbannon@gmail.com 16982 Kennedy Road Plan s Hello Mr Khan - I am writing with concern regarding the proposed plans for the single family home on the current 16982 Kennedy lot. I understand that the double Jot is being split to build two single family homes. am concerned with the proposed house closest to Los Gatos Blvd. The home elevation is much too high for this block of Kennedy Road. As it is now, there are no large two story homes on the south side of Kennedy from Los Gatos Blvd up to Gem. There is just one home that has a partial 2nd story set back in the lot. If the new home with the second story is build it will block mountain views as you turn on to Kennedy. With so many mature trees being taken down AND a large two story home, this will significantly change the nature of Kennedy Road, obstruct mountain views and take much of the green away. Thank you for carefully considering this proposal, and I urge you to require the builder to lower the elevation to a single story to better fit with the neighborhood. I would appreciate your feedback and follow up. Cathleen & Grant Bannon 16828 Kennedy Road Cathleen Bannon 415.819.1239 EXHIBIT 11 1 This Page Intentionally Left Blank