Loading...
Addendum PREPARED BY: STEPHEN CONWAY Finance Director Reviewed by: Town Manager, Assistant Town Manager, and Town Attorney 110 E. Main Street Los Gatos, CA 95030 ● 408-354-6832 www.losgatosca.gov TOWN OF LOS GATOS COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT MEETING DATE: 06/04/2019 ITEM NO: 3 ADDENDUM DATE: JUNE 3, 2019 TO: MAYOR AND TOWN COUNCIL FROM: LAUREL PREVETTI, TOWN MANAGER SUBJECT: A. ADOPT A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE TOWN OF LOS GATOS FISCAL YEAR (FY) 2019/20 OPERATING BUDGET AND FY 2019/20 – 2023/24 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (CIP), NEW APPROPRIATIONS, OTHER APPROVED ADJUSTMENTS, MINOR CORRECTIONS, INCORPORATING AFSCME, TEA, CONFIDENTIAL AND MANAGEMENT SALARY SCHEDULES; AND CARRY-FORWARD APPROPRIATIONS B. ADOPT A RESOLUTION APPROVING COMMITMENTS OF FUND BALANCE UNDER GASB 54 C. ADOPT AN UPDATE TO THE TOWN’S GENERAL FUND RESERVE POLICY RECOMMENDATION: A. Adopt a resolution approving the Town of Los Gatos Fiscal Year (FY) 2019/20 Operating Budget and FY 2019/20 – 2023/24 Capital Improvement Program (CIP), new appropriations, other approved adjustments, minor corrections, AFSCME, TEA, Confidential, and Management Salary Schedules, and carry-forward appropriations B. Adopt a resolution approving commitments of Fund Balance under GASB 54 C. Adopt an update to the Town’s General Fund Reserve Policy REMARKS: A Council Member had the following inquiry and staff’s response is provided below. Is the charge on the Unfunded Actuarial Liability (UAL) really interest like a loan if we pay it off it goes away or is it the assumed rate of return applied on the difference between the funds we have invested with CalPERS and the funds we need to have invested with CalPERS to cover all liabilities of future estimated payments to employee’s retirement? PAGE 2 OF 3 SUBJECT: OPERATING AND CAPITAL BUDGETS JUNE 3, 2019 S:\COUNCIL REPORTS\2019\06-04-19\Budget\Addendum Final.docx 6/3/2019 4:09 PM REMARKS (continued): While the actuarial valuations from CalPERS do refer to it as interest, it is important to understand the genesis of the UAL and how various loses/gains are applied to it during the development of the actuarial valuations. The actuarial assumption is that the UAL is the recognition of the deficiency in total assets necessary to cover total actuarial liabilities. As such, CalPERS charges the UAL the exact same expected rate of return assumption that is used for the assets even though it is referred to as interest. It is also important to note that assets are currently greater than the UAL so if the assumed rate of return is met, the expected gain on assets is greater than the cost associated with the UAL/deficient assets. That said, the additional cost associated with the charge on the UAL does impede the long-term goal of reducing the outstanding UAL. If we make the payments, do we save the 7% even if CalPERS only makes 4.3% on our payment? Similar to the previous response, it is important to understand how the various components utilized in the development of the actuarial valuations all ultimately impact the calculation of the UAL. In addition, actuarial valuations are a point in time measurement similar to our Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR). While at that point in time, the line item interest cost associated with the additional lump-sum discretionary payment toward the UAL has been reduced, any disparity between the assumed rate of return and actual market returns is calculated as an increase to the UAL. So, there is single point market entry risk associated with additional lump-sum discretionary payments. It could be argued that market fluctuations will happen regardless, but the significant difference is whether, or when, the Town proactively opts to expose additional discretionary assets to those market fluctuations. The risk is similar to the arguments used against the issuance of Pension Obligation Bonds (POBs). If your market timing is poor with the issuance of POBs, the theoretical arbitrage you would receive between the cost of debt issued at municipal rates versus the assumed rate of return disappears. What happens to our payment if CalPERS loses money during a period? Does our unfunded liability still go away because we have made the payment that should make the 7% interest go away? Similar to the above answer, the savings associated with an additional discretionary lump-sum payment is only one variable in the multivariant actuarial valuation calculation. The calculated cost associated with missing the assumed rate of return will work against any interest savings initially associated with a reduction in the UAL from a lumpsum payment. PAGE 3 OF 3 SUBJECT: OPERATING AND CAPITAL BUDGETS JUNE 3, 2019 S:\COUNCIL REPORTS\2019\06-04-19\Budget\Addendum Final.docx 6/3/2019 4:09 PM REMARKS (continued): Attachment 7 contains public comment received after 11:00 a.m. Friday, May 31, 2019 and before 11:00 a.m. Monday, June 3, 2019. Attachments previously received with the Staff Report: 1. Resolution of the Town Council Approving FY 2019/20 Operating Budget and FY 2019/20 – 2023/24 Capital Improvement Program (with Exhibit A) 2. FY 2019/20 Grants and Arts Funding Summary 3. AFSCME, TEA, Confidential, and Management Salary Schedules 4. Resolution of the Town Council of the Town of Los Gatos Approving Commitments of Fund Balance under GASB 54 5. FY 2018/19 and FY 2019/20 Estimated General Fund Balance Activities 6. General Fund Reserve Policy - Redline Attachments received with this Addendum: 7. Public Comments Received before 11:00 a.m. Monday, June 3, 2019