M12-17-07
1
MINUTES OF THE TOWN COUNCIL/PARKING
AUTHORITY/REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
DECEMBER 17, 2007
The Town Council of the Town of Los Gatos conducted a Regular Meeting on
Monday, December 17, 2007 at 7:00 P.M.
TOWN COUNCIL/PARKING AUTHORITY/REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
MEETING CALLED TO ORDER
ROLL CALL
Present: Mayor Barbara Spector, Vice Mayor Mike Wasserman, Council
Member Steve Glickman, Council Member Joe Pirzynski, and Council Member
Diane McNutt.
Absent: None.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - LED BY FUTURE LEADER
Mayor Barbara Spector led the Pledge of Allegiance. The Audience was invited
to participate.
BOARDS/COMMISSION/COMMITTEES APPOINTMENTS
Architectural Standards Committee (1 vacancy; 1 applicant)
Arts Commission (5 vacancies; 6 applicants)
Arts Selection Panel (2 vacancies; 1 applicant)
Building Board of Appeals (3 vacancies; 3 applicants)
Community Services Commission (4 vacancies; 5 applicants)
General Plan (1 vacancy; 1 applicant
Historic Preservation Committee (1 vacancy; 4 applicants)
Library Board (1 vacancy; 3 applicants)
Parks Commission (3 vacancies; 8 applicants)
Personnel Board (1 applicant; 1 applicant)
Planning Commission (2 vacancies; 5 applicants
Transportation and Parking (3 vacancies; 2 applicants)
2
Boards, Commissions, and Committee Appointments – Continued
The following applicants were appointed to the Town’s Boards,
Commissions, and Committees:
Ar chitectural Standards Committee
Peggy Dallas – Incumbent
Arts Commission
Jade Bradbury – Incumbent
Tricia Capri
Jonathan Knowles
Mary Curtis
Penelope O’Neill - Incumbent
Art SelectionPanel
Sol Carson – Incumbent
Building Board of Appeals
Tom Dodge – Incumbent
Tom Kane – Incumbent
Adrienne Paolini-McGrath
Community Services Commission
Leslie Alexander
Toni Blackstock – Incumbent
Susan Gomez – Incumbent
Anita Wolf
General Plan Committee
Jane Ogle – Incumbent
Historic Preservation Committee
Leonard Pacheco – Incumbent
Library Board
Dale Hill – Incumbent
Parks Commission
Stephen Endweiss
Gary Schloh - Monte Sereno Resident
Barbara Holden
Personnel Board
Berkeley Miller – Incumbent
Transportation and Parking Commission
Edgar La Veque – Incumbent
Chris Tanimoto
Planning Commission
Thomas O'Donnell – Incumbent
Joanne Talesfore – Incumbent
Mayor Barbara Spector directed Jackie Rose, Clerk Administrator to re-
advertise the vacant positions on the Arts Selection Panel, Rent Advisory
Committee, and Transportation and Parking Commission.
3
PRESENTATION
Commendation Police Canines
Mayor Barbara Spector presented Corporal Erin Lunsford and Eddie, and
Sergeant Sam Wonnell and Quarz with a commendation for their excellent
performance as Canine Officers for the Los Gatos-Monte Sereno Police
Department.
Mayor Barbara Spector
Commented on the acceptance of an $8,000 donation from Society Dog to
support the purchase and training of a police dog for the Los Gatos-Monte
Sereno Police Department.
Thanked the Society Dog organization for the donation and support in the
community.
TOWN COUNCIL
CONSENT ITEMS (TO BE ACTED UPON BY A SINGLE MOTION)
1. Ratify payroll for the month of November, 2007.
2. Ratify accounts payable for November, 2007.
3. Approve Council minutes of November 7, 2007 Town Council/Planning
Commission Retreat.
4. PPW Job No. 07-04 - Fiscal Year 2007-08 Annual Street Repair and
Resurfacing Project 400-0352 Adopt resolution approving plans and
specifications for the annual street repair and resurfacing project and
authorize staff to advertise the project for bid. RESOLUTION 2007-128
5. Adopt resolution authorizing the Interim Town Manager to execute a
second amendment to the agreement between the Town of Los Gatos
and the City of Campbell until June 30, 2009 to increase the fee for
underground utility locating services from $65.00 to $75.00/per USA
inspection. Resolution 2007-129
6. Adopt resolution authorizing the Interim Town Manager to execute a
second amendment to the Professional Consultant Services
Agreement with Harris & Associates to extend the agreement until
June 30, 2008 for providing engineering support services.
RESOLUTION 2007-130
4
Consent Items - Continued
7. Adopt resolution authorizing the Interim Town Manager to accept a
donation from the Los Gatos Police Foundation in the amount of
$8,000.00 to be used towards the purchase and training of a general
purpose canine and the equipment needed to support the canine.
RESOLUTION 2007-131
8. Adopt resolution setting date for consideration of reorganization of
uninhabited area designated La Chiquita No. 1, approximately .65 acre
located at 16357 East La Chiquita Avenue (APN 532-04-035).
RESOLUTION 2007-132
9. Adopt resolution setting date for consideration of reorganization of
uninhabited area designated Blackberry Hill Road No. 5,
approximately 1.98 acres located at 15401 and 17689 Blackberry Hill
Road (APN 532-25-009 and 010). RESOLUTION 2007-133
10. Adopt resolution setting date for consideration of reorganization of
uninhabited area designated Kennedy Road No. 16, approximately .52
acre located at 16683 Kennedy Road (APN 532-08-057).
RESOLUTION 2007-134
11. Consideration of reorganization of uninhabited area designated
Marchmont Drive No. 2 (approximately .28 acres) located at 16666
Marchmont Drive (APN: 532-08-006). RESOLUTION 2007-137
12. Approve Council Committee Appointments effective January 1, 2008.
13. Adopt resolution approving an extension of the Memorandum of
Understanding between the Town of Los Gatos and TEA for the period
of November 1, 2007 through October 31, 2010 and authorize the
Interim Town Manager to execute the side letter agreement to extend
the Memorandum of Understanding. RESOLUTION 2007-135
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
14. Ratify accounts payable for November, 2007.
5
Consent Items - Continued
TOWN COUNCIL/REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
15. Approve Council/Agency minutes of December 3, 2007.
16. Consider adopting resolution approving the 2006/07 Annual Report
for the Los Gatos Redevelopment Agency. RESOLUTION 2007-136
Council Member McNutt recused from Consent Item #4 due to the fact that she
resides within 500 feet of the project.
Mr. Davis pulled Consent Item #3.
Mayor Barbara Spector stated that the pulled Consent Item #3 would be heard
after the Public Hearing this evening.
MOTION: Motion by Council Member Steve Glickman to approve
Consent Items #1, #2 and #4-16.
Seconded by Vice Mayor Mike Wasserman.
VOTE: Motion passed unanimously for Consent Items #1, #2
and #5-16.
Consent Item #4 carried 4/0. Council Member Diane
McNutt recused due the fact that she resides within 500 feet
of the project.
CLOSED SESSION REPORT
Mr. Korb stated that Council did not meet in Closed Session this evening.
VERBAL COMMUNICATIONS
Mr. Knopf
Commented that a prior Town survey recommended converting the vacant
land on Miles Avenue to a parking lot, which was later implemented.
Commented that the community uses the Miles Avenue parking Lot.
Commented that he is against converting the parking lot to a skate park.
6
Verbal Communications - Continued
Mr. Davis
Commented that he feels that there are at least 80 new parking spaces
available around the Miles Avenue area.
Commented about being thrown out of a public meeting on November 17,
2007.
Commented about the distribution of the skate park measure petitions by
the Clerk Department.
Mr. Burke
Commented about the amount of cars parked in the permit parking zones
without permits.
Requested an increase in signage to better identify permit parking zones.
Mr. Murphy
Commented against Measure D.
Commented that parking for sports uses and downtown businesses would
be impacted if Miles Avenue parking lot was converted to a skate park.
Commented on the lack of sidewalks, curbs or gutters which would be a
safety concern if the skate park was built.
Mr. Leonardis
Commented on supporting Measure D.
Commented that there are no parking and safety issues related to Miles
Avenue.
Commented that the Miles Avenue property will always be owned by the
Town.
Ms. Currie
Stated that she feels it is unfair to force the Town to pay for a skate park.
Commented that she supports a skate park built for the community and
paid for by the community and not with Town funds.
Mr. Spilsbury
Stated that he feels it is unfair to force the Town to pay for a skate park
with money from the Town’s General Fund.
Commented that he feels that there are other ways that public funds would
benefit the entire community.
7
Verbal Communication – Continued
Mr. Decker
Commented against Measure D.
Commented on the concept of a skate park that was previously proposed
to the community.
Commented on privately funded programs that benefit the community.
Commented on the lack of parking in the downtown area.
Commented that Measure D is a poor use of public funds.
Closed Verbal Communications
Mayor Barbara Spector
Commented on the public hearing process for this evening.
Called for a brief recess at 7:51 p.m.
Meeting resumed at 8:00 p.m.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
17. Consider a request for approval to change the zone from R-1:8 to R-
1:8:PD for a seven lot subdivision, for a lot line adjustment between
two parcels zoned R-1:8 and approval to demolish a single family
residence. No significant environmental impacts have been identified
as a result of this project and a Mitigated Negative Declaration is
recommended. APNS 523-25-020 and 036. Planned Development
Application PD-05-02, Architecture and Site Application S-06-050 and
Negative Declaration ND-07-07. Property location: 15881 Linda
Avenue and 15950 Stephenie Lane. Owners: Jennifer Den Daas and
Dan Blue. Applicant: Linda Court Partners
Staff report made by Bud Lortz, Director of Community Development.
8
Public Hearing Item #17 – Continued
Council Comments
Questioned if staff could advise Council regarding the accuracy of input
received during the public hearing.
Questioned the Town’s analysis of the FAR for the proposed Planned
Development.
Questioned if the re-alignment of the back lot would change the
calculation of the FAR of the homes.
Clarification about the proposed changes to the common area, garden
wall, and lot lines for the Planned Development.
Clarification about the common area between lots 3 and 4.
Clarification about the riparian buffer line for the proposed Planned
Development.
Questioned how calculations regarding the decrease of the footprint of the
homes would be presented.
Questioned the methodology used for the Coyote Joman Report.
Mr. Lortz, Director of Community Development
Commented that he believes the FAR is consistent with the Town’s
requirements.
Commented that staff could run a re-calculation of the FAR as the meeting
progresses.
Mr. Tsuda, Assistant Director of Community Development
Clarified staff recommendations relating to the garden area, common area
and lot lines of the proposed project.
Open Public Hearing
Mr. McElroy, Applicant
Commented about the project process and proposed changes over the
past three years.
Commented that all agencies have approved th e proposed Planned
Development.
Commented that the only residents against the project are county
residents.
9
Public Hearing Item #17 – Continued
Mr. Guzzetti, Applicant
Commented that the proposed Planned Development was passed by the
Planning Commission on October 10, 2007.
Commented about the Architectural and Site review process.
Commented that the Planning Commission had five architectural issues
relating to the proposed Planned Development.
Commented that the applicants agreed to sufficient vegetation screening,
a retaining wall, and a 6 foot fence between the house on lot 1 and the
easterly property line.
Commented that the applicants agreed to recess the garage doors on lots
1 and 2 and have re-designed those plans.
Commented that the applicants agreed to relocate the bio -swale outside
the drip line of the existing riparian trees and that their civil engineer will
be completing the re-design.
Commented that the applicant thinks the condition to limit the impervious
surface in the rear yards of lots 1 through 4 is unfair.
Commented that all agencies have had no concerns with the property
lines as proposed.
Commented about residential zoning guidelines.
Mr. Davis
Commented about a statement by Mr. Lortz at the Planning Commission
stating that the riparian corridor of Ross Creek was not addressed
properly.
Stated that the West Valley Water District turned over land use by creeks
and streams to the Town and questioned if the Town has addressed the
riparian corridor at Ross Creek.
Mr. Orion spoke on behalf of Ms. Orion, Mr. Ownberg, Ms. Swanson, Mr.
Dunlap, Mr. and Ms. Rossmassler, Mr. and Ms. Lambert, Mr. Yanez-pastor
Commented that there is no flood plain and riparian corridor buffer.
Commented about the Guidelines and Standards for Land Use Near
Streams.
Commented that he feels that the stream would be hidden and would like
to see designs that do not have homes backed up to the creek or stream.
Commented that they do not support the proposed project.
10
Public Hearing Item #17 – Continued
Council Comments
Questioned how the funding for the Coyote Joman Report came about.
Ms. Engrin spoke on behalf of Mr. Hslao, Mr. Colhour, Ms. McWaters, and
Mr. Ryan
Commented about the riparian corridor setback.
Commented that the Guidelines and Standards for Land Use Near
Streams adopted in February, 2007 states that 20 feet is adequate for a
riparian buffer.
Would like to see more open space for the Ross Creek area.
Commented about the project being inconsistent with the Town's General
Plan.
Requested that Council spend more time studying the
proposed development.
Mr. Crites
Commented about the amount of trees that would be removed for the
proposed project.
Commented about the Town Tree Ordinance for removal of trees and
riparian vegetation.
Commented that the FAR is too dense for the proposed project.
Mr. Engin
Commented that the project fails to meet 6 conditions in the Guidelines
and Standards for Land Use Near Streams adopted by the Town.
Commented that he feels that the proposed project violates the riparian
corridor and tree protection ordinance.
Commented that many concerns would be addressed if the homes did not
back up against the creek.
Mr. McElroy, Applicant
Commented that he feels that the reports misrepresent the project.
Council Comments
Questioned if the applicant would consider changing the boundary line of
the intended wall if the change would not count against the FAR of the
proposed home.
11
Public Hearing Item #17 – Continued
Mr. McElroy, Applicant
Commented that he would agree to change the boundary line if the project
would be approved.
Commented that the creek would be less traveled if only one family has
access to the creek.
Commented that he feels that the Homeowners Association should be
responsible for maintaining the creek and the creek accesses.
Council Comments
Questioned the amount of travel along the creek if the homes were facing
the creek instead of backing up to the creek.
Questioned the open path proposed along the creek.
Questioned the view of the garden wall from the neighbors across the
street.
Questioned moving the road down by the creek.
Mr. McElroy
Commented that the location of the street is limited due to technical
reasons and is needed for public access.
Mayor Barbara Spector
Closed the public hearing
Requested staff comment about the environmental and technical issues
raised by the public.
Mayor Barbara Spector
Called for a recess at 9:17 p.m.
Meeting resumed at 9:27 p.m.
Mr. Korb
Clarified the California Environmental Quality Act requirements and how it
applies to the project.
Commented about the fair argument review when a project is challenged
under CEQA guidelines.
Commented that substantial evidence is required to support a fair
argument review.
Clarified the type of reports that qualify for CEQA and a fair argument
review request.
12
Public Hearing Item #17 – Continued
Mr. Lortz
Stated that if staff recommendations were approved, the FAR would be
slightly over the guidelines, but would stop the encroachment into the
riparian corridor.
Commented that the road location has been a long evolution and due to
the topographic constraints of the site the design did not include a road
near the creek.
Commented that the project is compliant with the Town’s adopted
Guidelines and Standards for Land Use Near Streams.
Council Comments
Questioned if the garden wall minimizes access to the riparian corridor.
Questioned if the Town has a desire to decrease access to the creek.
Mr. Lortz
Commented that Fish and Game, Water Resources, Water Quality Control
Board, Santa Clara Valley Water District, and numerous biologists agree
with the approach to move the lot lines and support passive use along the
creek.
Commented about the different methodologies used for the proposed
project.
Mr. Korb
Clarified Council decision making process when dealing with different
expert opinions.
Mr. Tsuda
Commented that Guidelines and Standards for Land Use Near Streams
have at least 8 chapters, but only two are considered regulatory chapter s.
Commented that chapter 2 clarifies the permitting tools and permitting
process for the review and chapter 3 contains the guidelines and
standards.
Commented that the remaining chapters are guidelines to contractors,
homeowners and developers.
Commented on chapter 7 which is called enhanced practices, but it does
not include requirements.
Commented that creek slope stability analysis is not required for the
project.
Commented that the guidelines and standards do not state a number for
the riparian buffer, but suggests that the cities should make these findings.
Commented that the biological areas should be protected.
13
Public Hearing Item #17 – Continued
Council Discussion
Questioned what amount of public use is appropriate along the riparian
corridor.
Commented about locations of fences on the proposed project.
Questioned if the property line should go along the proposed garden wall.
Clarification about public access along Ross Creek.
Questioned if public access to the creek would harm the ecology.
Mr. Geier, Consultant
Commented about the reports on the riparian resources.
Commented that they had identified a buffer zone to protect the riparian
zone.
Commented that the Fish and Game along with other agencies agreed
that impacts could be mitigated.
Council Discussion
Questioned if the footprint of the homes encroaches o n any of the riparian
corridor.
Questioned if the riparian zone would be wide enough for public walks and
whether it would harm Ross Creek.
Mr. Geier
Commented that the reports discourage public access.
Mr. Wood, Consultant
Commented on the concept of placing roadways adjacent to waterways.
Commented that public access would enhance natural resource
awareness and encourage clean-up along Ross Creek.
Council Discussion
Questioned if Mr. Wood would share his opinions about flooding along
Ross Creek.
Questioned if there were concerns about the fair argument review
process.
14
Public Hearing Item #17 – Continued
Mr. Wood
Commented that staff has adequately addressed regulatory concerns by
the State of California.
Mr. Wheeler, Consultant
Commented about the geomorphology of land forms a s it relates to
channel bed forms and streams.
Commented on the calculations used to determine flood issues along
Ross Creek.
Council Discussion
Questioned the reports about the flood plains for Ross Creek.
Questioned if Mr. Wheeler believes the flood plain would be within the
riparian zone.
Mr. Wheeler
Commented on historic conditions and flood plains along Ross Creek.
Commented on the perception of a 100 year flood plain along Ross Creek.
Ms. Geier
Commented about specific guidelines set by CEQA.
Commented that the riparian corridor would supply adequate screening for
the proposed project.
Commented about the alder and valley oak trees that were not evaluated
by the arborist.
Mr. Wood
Stated that the arborists could have missed the trees or the valley oak
may have been mistaken for the blue oak.
Commented that the alders that were missed may have been saplings at
that time.
15
Public Hearing Item #17 – Continued
Mr. Korb
Commented that Council should determine whether reports are based
on opinions supported by facts or erroneous information, which in that
case should be disregarded.
Commented that Council has an obligation to act if they feel that the
opinions are supported by fact.
Commented that the Joman Report reached its conclusion about the
location of the 100 year flood/high water mark using a methodology
different from Town staff, the water district and FEMA.
Commented that all of the agencies involved have computed a study
on Ross Creek, indicating the 100 year flood issue, and have similar
conclusions.
Commented that the difference in the reports is where the top of the
bank should be determined along Ross Creek.
Commented that the Town has guidelines that would address where
the top of the bank is located.
Mayor Barbara Spector asked for suggestions on the next steps
regarding the motion process.
Mr. Korb suggested that Council may start with a motion about the CEQA
question.
MOTION: Motion by Council Member Steve Glickman that further
study is not required for the proposed project.
Seconded by Council Member Joe Pirzynski.
Council Discussion
Questioned the flood scenario in the Joman Report and asked which lot
setback is not sufficient.
Mr. Lortz
Clarified that lot #3 would be the only lot impacted.
16
Public Hearing Item #17 – Continued
Council Discussion
Commented about the rain fall gauges in the Joman analysis.
Commented that the Coyote Guadalupe Joman Report is not a fair
argument.
VOTE: Motion passed unanimously.
MOTION: Motion by Council Member Diane McNutt to accept report
in the form of meeting minutes from the Planning
Commission for the meeting of October 10, 2007 regarding a
Planned Development at 15881 Linda Avenue and a portion
of 15950 Stephanie Lane.
Seconded by Council Member Steve Glickman.
VOTE: Motion passed unanimously.
MOTION: Motion by Council Member Steve Glickman to make the
Mitigated Negative Declaration.
Seconded by Council Member Joe Pirzynski.
VOTE: Motion passed unanimously.
17
Public Hearing Item #17 – Continued
Council Discussion
Commented that the Planning Commission had two elements in its motion
that were not part of the proposed Planned Development.
Commented that one element involved impervious surfaces and should be
included in Council’s motion.
Requested that the motion indicate that the amount of impervious surface
in the backyards of the houses facing the creek be limited to only what is
required for pedestrian circulation.
Commented that by adding the garden wall, there would be no need for
restrictions on impervious surfaces.
Requested that staff clarify the recommendation to restrict impervious
surfaces.
Mr. Lortz
Clarified recommendations made by the Planning Commission relating to
impervious surface restrictions.
Council Discussion
Questioned if the issue of impervious surfaces would include swimming
pools.
Suggested that the motion be modified to include the issue of impervious
surface run off into the creek, which would be addressed by staff.
Commented that the maker of the motion and the seconde r of the motion
agreed to the suggested wording.
MOTION: Motion by Council Member Steve Glickman to approve
ordinance as stated in Attachment #23.
Motion was modified to include:
Staff to determine mitigation measures to significantly
reduce impervious surface run off from backyards of
homes that face the creek.
Seconded by Council Member Joe Pirzynski.
Mr. Korb Suggested that Council table the motion to approve ordinance until all
other motions are called.
18
Public Hearing Item #17 – Continued
MOTION: Motion by Mayor Barbara Spector to include that the
Architecture and Site application go back to the planning
Commission.
Motion failed due to lack of second.
MOTION: Motion by Council Member Steve Glickman to make the
required findings as listed in Attachment #19 of the staff
report.
Seconded by Council Member Joe Pirzynski.
VOTE: Motion passed unanimously.
MOTION: Motion by Council Member Steve Glickman to adopt
Mitigation Monitoring Plan as listed in attachment #21 of the
staff report.
Seconded by Council Member Joe Pirzynski.
VOTE: Motion passed unanimously.
Mayor Barbara Spector directed Jackie Rose, Clerk Administrator to read the
title of the planned development ordinance.
MOTION: Motion by Council Member Steve Glickman to wave the
reading of the Planned Development Ordinance.
Seconded by Vice Mayor Mike Wasserman.
VOTE: Motion passed unanimously.
19
Public Hearing Item #17 – Continued
Mr. Korb advised Council that they may vote on the tabled motion related to
approval of the planned development ordinance.
Council Discussion
Motion made by Council Member Steve Glickman to approve the
planned development ordinance (Attachment #23) with amendments
regarding impervious surfaces was reiterated at this time.
Commented that for a previous project, Council approved the Architecture
and Site application returning to the Planning Commission, as the
Planning Commission minutes had indicated that it would return to
them. For this project, Council is comfortable with the Architecture and
Site application going to the Development Review Committee as is the
practice when a Planned Development application includes significant
architecture and site details.
VOTE: Motion carried 4/1. Mayor Barbara Spector voted no.
MOTION: Motion by Council Member Steve Glickman to introduce
ordinance to effectuate Planned Development Application
PD-04-5 and the zone change as listed in Attachment #23 of
the staff report.
Seconded by Council Member Joe Pirzynski.
VOTE: Motion passed unanimously.
MOTION: Motion by Council Member Steve Glickman to approve
the Architecture and Site application subject to conditions
listed in Attachment #22 of the staff report.
Seconded by Council Member Joe Pirzynski.
VOTE: Motion carried 4/1. Mayor Barbara Spector voted no.
Mr. Korb
Clarified the process to introduce and adopt the ordinance for the Planned
Development located at Linda Avenue.
Commented that the ordinance will be brought back for adoption at a
future Council meeting.
20
PULLED CONSENT ITEM #3
3. Approve Council minutes of November 7, 2007 Town Council/Planning
Commission Retreat.
Mr. Davis pulled Consent Item #3, but was not in attendance to speak to the
item.
MOTION: Motion by Council Member Steve Glickman to approve
Consent Item #3.
Seconded by Council Member Diane McNutt.
VOTE: Motion passed unanimously.
OTHER BUSINESS
There was no Other Business scheduled for the meeting of December 17, 2007.
COUNCIL/TOWN MANAGER REPORTS
18. Council Matters
Council Member Mike Wasserman
Requested Council consider making the park/sports use needs
assessment a priority and have it completed by April 1, 2008.
Pamela Jacobs, Interim Town Manager
Clarified that the park and sports use needs assessment survey should be
complete by March, 2008.
Council Member Steve Glickman
Questioned if the survey would include recreation facilities.
Mayor Barbara Spector
Suggested that residents in Los Gatos who have switched to LED lights
for the holidays should register at www.westvalleygreenleaf.com so that
Los Gatos can win the LED competition.
21
19. Manager Matters
Pamela Jacobs, Interim Town Manager
Announced that the Town has purchased a ford escape hybrid which joins
the Town’s large fleet of green vehicles.
Commented that the Northern California Solar Energy Association recently
presented the Town of Los Gatos with a second place award for the
number of solar applications granted for a medium size city.
Thanked Council and staff for their support during her term as Interim
Town Manager.
Thanked Patsy Garcia for her assistance and support during her term as
the Interim Town Manager.
ADJOURNMENT
Attest:
Jackie D. Rose, Clerk Administrator