2012-059 - Adopt the Addendum to the 2020 General Plan Environmental Impact Report and Approving the Sustainability PlanRESOLUTION 2012 -059
RESOLUTION OF THE TOWN COUNCIL
OF THE TOWN OF LOS GATOS
ADOPTING THE ADDENDUM TO THE 2020 GENERAL PLAN ENVIRONMENTAL
IMPACT REPORT AND APPROVING THE SUSTAINABILITY PLAN.
WHEREAS, Action ENV -13.1 of the 2020 General Plan directs the Town to develop a
GHG Emission Reduction Plan to control and reduce GHG emissions, and to adopt the plan prior
to adoption of any specific plan, and within 24 months of the adoption of the 2020 General Plan;
and
WHEREAS, the Town of Los Gatos has prepared the Sustainability Plan to serve as the
Town's Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions Reduction Plan, along with the Addendum to the
2020 General Plan Environmental Impact Report (EIR); and
WHEREAS, the implementation of the Sustainability Plan is intended to identify how
the community can reduce GHG emissions, increase energy efficiency and conservation, and
address recent changes to the State and Federal regulatory environment; and
WHEREAS, the Sustainability Plan establishes a GHG Emissions Reduction Target and
community and municipal measures to achieve the target; and
WHEREAS, opportunities were provided for the involvement of citizens, public
agencies, public utilities, school districts, and various civic groups through, among other things,
a workshop, open house, a public comment period, and public hearings over a 10 -month period;
M
WHEREAS, under the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)
and the CEQA Guidelines, the Town of Los Gatos prepared an Addendum to the 2020 General
Plan EIR; and
1
WHEREAS, under the provisions of the Government Code and the California
Environmental Quality Act, the Planning Commission conducted duly noticed public hearings
regarding the Addendum and recommendation of the Sustainability Plan on August 8 and 22,
and September 26, 2012, and recommended that the Los Gatos Town Council adopt the
Addendum and approve the Sustainability Plan; and
WHEREAS, the Los Gatos Town Council considered all recommendations made by the
Planning Commission; and
WHEREAS, the Los Gatos Town Council conducted duly noticed public hearings and
received public testimony about the Sustainability Plan and the Addendum on October 15, 2012;
"ITII
WHEREAS, on October 15, 2012, the Los Gatos Town Council found that the
Addendum to the 2020 General Plan EIR as recommended for adoption by the Planning
Commission, was prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act and
guidelines and is complete;
WHEREAS, Council finds as follows:
A. The proposed Sustainability Plan is consistent with and supports the General Plan
goal to promote a sustainable community that protects enviromnental resources and the climate
to prevent negative impacts to future generations. The Sustainability Plan is a detailed, long-
range strategy to promote sustainability in and reduce GHG emissions through transportation and
land use, energy, water, solid waste, and open space.
2
B. The proposed Sustainability Plan is consistent with General Plan policies intended
to promote sustainability of resources, waste reduction, and energy conservation. The
Sustainability Plan guides the community with measures in the following areas: transportation
and land use; green building; renewable energy and low carbon fuels; energy conservation; water
and wastewater; solid waste; open space; purchasing; and community action. These measures
will allow the Town to achieve the emissions reduction target by the year 2020 and contribute to
the Town's sustainability of resources, waste reduction, and energy conservation.
C. The Council certified and adopted a Final EIR (FEIR) for the Los Gatos General
Plan 2020 on September 20, 2010. In July 2012, the Town prepared an Addendum to the
previous EIR. The Council hereby finds and determines that since certification of the FEIR in
2010, some changes or additions are necessary, but none of the conditions described in CEQA
Guidelines Section 15162 requiring preparation of a subsequent EIR have occurred. In addition,
based on the analysis in Appendix G Checklist in the EIR Addendum, approval and
implementation of the Sustainability Plan would not create any new or significant environmental
impacts studied in the Los Gatos General Plan 2020 EIR.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the Los Gatos Town Council adopts the
Addendum and approves the Sustainability Plan dated July 25, 2012.
3
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Town Council of the Town of
Los Gatos, California, held on the 15`x' day of October, 2012, by the following vote:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
AYES: Steven Leonardis, Diane McNutt, Joe Pirzynski, Barbara Spector, and Mayor Steve Rice
NAYS:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
r
SIGNED:
MAYOR TOd O LO GATOS
LOS GATOS, CALIFORNIA
ATTEST: _� ' " a "&ti&
CLERK ADMINISTRATOR OF THE TOWN OF LOS GATOS
LOS GATOS, CALIFORNIA
Il
6 u
S stop
Co MMUN_p U5 L"
Las Gatos via
Los Gatos
c w`° P O _ 1
4
1a
av-
` ,4W PLANNING
CENTER
DC &E
4
1 :.
µa?�1f3
av-
` ,4W PLANNING
CENTER
DC &E
4
1 :.
Los Gatos Sustainability Plan
October 15, 2012
Prepared For; The Town of Los Gatos
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. INTRODUCTION ..................................................... ............................... I -1
2. EXISTING GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS INVENTORY .. ............................... 2 -1
3. 2020 BUSINESS AS USUAL AND ADJUSTED GREENHOUSE GAS
EMISSIONS INVENTORY ............................................ ............................... 3 -1
4. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS REDUCTION TARGET ... ............................... 4 -1
5. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS REDUCTION MEASURES .............................. 5 -1
6. IMPLEMENTATION MONITORING .............................. ............................... 6 -1
Appendices
Appendix A:
Community Workshop Summary
Appendix B:
Inventory and Forecast Modeling Files
Appendix C:
GHG Emissions Reductions Measures Modeling Data
Appendix D:
Transportation and Land Use Measures Modeling Summary
Appendix E:
Summary of Measure Reductions and Implementation
TOWN OF LOS G A T O S
L O S G A T O S S L I S T A I N A B I L I T Y P L A N
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Figures
Figure 1 -1 The Greenhouse Effect ................................ ............................... 1 -3
Tables
Table 2 -1 Baseline Communitywide Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Summary...................................................... ...............................
2 -2
Table 2 -2
Baseline Communitywide Greenhouse Gas Emissions from
Transportation Sources ................................ ...............................
2 -2
Table 2 -3
Baseline Communitywide Greenhouse Gas Emissions from
ResidentialLand Uses .................................. ...............................
2 -4
Table 2 -4
Baseline Communitywide Greenhouse Gas Emissions from
Non Residential Land Uses .......................... ...............................
2 -4
Table 2 -5
Baseline Communitywide Greenhouse Gas Emissions from
WasteDisposal ............................................. ...............................
2 -7
Table 2 -6
Baseline Communitywide Greenhouse Gas Emissions from
Water Use and Wastewater Generation ....... ...............................
2 -7
Table 2 -7
Baseline Communitywide Greenhouse Gas Emissions from
OtherEmissions ........................................ ...............................
2 -10
Table 3 -1
Existing and 2020 Population, Employment, and Housing
Projections................................................... ...............................
3 -2
Table 3 -2
Baseline and Forecast Year 2020 Business as Usual
Communitywide Greenhouse Gas Emissions Summary ...........
3 -2
Table 3 -3
Baseline and Adjusted Forecast Year 2020 Communitywide
Greenhouse Gas Emissions Summary ......... ...............................
3 -4
Table 3 -4
2020 Communitywide Greenhouse Gas Emissions from
Transportation Sources ................................ ...............................
3 -8
Table 3 -5
2020 Communitywide Greenhouse Gas Emissions from
Residential and Non - Residential Land Uses ...............................
3 -8
Table 3 -6
2020 Communitywide Greenhouse Gas Emissions from
Water Use and Wastewater Generation ....... ...............................
3 -9
Table 3 -7
2020 Communitywide Greenhouse Gas Emissions from
WasteDisposal ........................................... ...............................
3 -11
Table 3 -8
2020 Communitywide Greenhouse Gas Emissions from
OtherEmissions ........................................ ...............................
3 -I1
Table 4 -1
Target and Gap Analysis .............................. ...............................
4 -3
Table 5 -1
Communitywide GHG Emission Reductions by Sector ...........
5 -3
1 INTRODUCTION
Los Gatos is a charming, vibrant community that has achieved enviable suc-
cess in balancing its location in the bustling Silicon Valley with a friendly,
small -town atmosphere. Through thoughtful planning over the 125 years
since incorporation in 1887, Los Gatos has managed to grow and evolve while
maintaining respect for its beautiful natural setting and preserving its historic
character and a distinct sense of place. Throughout its history and as it moves
into the 21" century, the residents and leaders of Los Gatos have recognized
that a healthy and prosperous community must weigh economic, environ-
mental, and social goals when planning for the future.
In 2010, under the leadership of the Town Council and with substantial input
from an engaged and passionate community, the Town adopted an updated
2020 General Plan that focused on promoting sustainability. The 2020 Gen-
eral Plan defines sustainability as "using resources in the present in a manner
that does not compromise the choices and quality of life of future genera-
tions." The 2020 General Plan recognizes that sustainability goals can be met
several ways, including increasing alternative modes of transportation, main-
taining a healthy local economy, and preserving open space.
This Sustainability Plan is a key tool in implementing the 2020 General Plan.
It is a detailed, long -range strategy to achieve sustainability in transportation
and land use, energy, water, solid waste, and open space. Collectively, ad-
dressing community development and conservation through these lenses will
help Los Gatos remain attractive, prosperous, and adaptive to social, political,
and environmental changes.
This Sustainability Plan addresses the major sources of greenhouse gas (GHG)
emissions in Los Gatos and sets forth a detailed and long -term strategy that
the Town and community can implement to achieve the GHG emissions
reduction target. Implementation of this Sustainability Plan will guide Los
Gatos' actions to reduce its contribution to global warming and will support
ambitious emission reduction targets adopted by the State of California. The
Sustainability Plan will also be utilized for tiering and streamlining of future
development within Los Gatos pursuant to California Environmental Quail-
1-1
TOWN OF LOS G A T O S
L O S G A T O S S U S T A I N A B I L I T Y P L A N
I N T R O O U C T I ON
ty Act (CEQA) Guidelines 15152 and 15183.5. The Sustainability Plan serves
as the CEQA threshold of significance within the town for the effects of
GHGs, by which all applicable developments within the town will be re-
viewed.
This chapter provides background information about the effects of GHGs,
existing sustainability efforts in Los Gatos, and public participation in the
Town's sustainability planning processes.
A. E(ferts of Greenhouse Gases
The earth's atmosphere is composed of naturally- occurring and anthropogen-
ic (i.e. induced by human activity) GHGs that trap heat in the atmosphere
and regulate the earth's temperature. This phenomenon, (mown as the
greenhouse effect, is responsible for maintaining a habitable climate on earth.
GHGs present in the earth's lower atmosphere play a critical role in main-
taining the earth's temperature as they trap some of the longwave infrared
radiation emitted from the earth's surface which otherwise would have es-
caped to space, as shown in Figure 1 -1.
Water vapor and carbon dioxide are the most abundant GHGs in the atmos-
phere. The gases that are widely seen as the principal contributors to anthro-
pogenic global warming are carbon dioxide, nitrous oxide, methane, hydro -
fluorocarbons, perfluorocarbons, and sulfur hexafluoride. While human ac-
tivity results in the release of some GHGs that occur naturally, such as car-
bon dioxide and methane, other gases, like hydrofluorocarbons, perfluoro-
carbons, and sulfur hexafluoride, are human -made.
The combustion of fossil fuels and deforestation release carbon, in the form
of carbon dioxide, into the atmosphere that historically has been stored un-
derground in sediments or in surface vegetation. With the accelerated in-
crease of fossil fuel combustion and deforestation since the industrial revolu-
tion of the 19th century, concentrations of GHGs have increased exponential-
ly in the atmosphere. Increases in the atmospheric concentrations of GHGs
1 -2
TOWN OF LOS G A T O S
L O S G A T O S S U S T A I N A B I L I T Y P L A N
INTRODUCTION
FIGURE 1 -1 THE GREENHOUSE EFFECT
in excess of natural ambient concentrations contribute to the enhancement of
the natural greenhouse effect.
This enhanced greenhouse effect has contributed to global warming, which is
an increased rate of warming of the earth's surface temperature. Specifically,
increases in GHGs lead to increased absorption of longwave infrared radia-
tion by the earth's atmosphere and warm the lower atmosphere further,
thereby increasing evaporation rates and temperatures near the surface.
Warming of the earth's lower atmosphere induces large -scale changes in ocean
circulation patterns, precipitation patterns, global ice cover, biological distri-
butions, and other large -scale changes to the earth system.
The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) was established by
the World Meteorological Organization and United Nations Environment
1 -3
TOWN OF LOS G A T O S
L O S G A T O S S U S T A I N A B I L I T Y P L A N
INTRODUCTION
Programme to assess scientific, technical, and socioeconomic information
relevant to the understanding of climate change, its potential impacts, and
options for adaptation and mitigation. The IPCC estimates that the average
global temperature rise between the years 2000 and 2100 could range from
LVC, with no increase in GHG emissions above year 2000 levels, to G.4 °C,
with a substantial increase in GHG emissions.' Large increases in global tem-
peratures could have massive deleterious impacts on the natural and human
environments. The prevailing opinion among scientists is that most of the
change in temperatures observed in the last 50 years is the result of human
activities!
Scientific studies, best represented by the IPCC's periodic reports, demon-
strate that climate change is already occurring due to past GHG emissions.
Forecasting of future growth and related GHG emissions under business as
usual (BAU) conditions, which are discussed further in Chapter 3, indicates
large increases in those GHG emissions accompanied by an increasing severi-
ty of changes in global climate. Thus, the best scientific evidence concludes
that global emissions must be reduced below current levels.
B. Regulatory Action Related to Greenhouse Gases
As GHGs gain increasing attention, government agencies and organizations
are working to develop and implement solutions to control GHG emissions
' IPCC, 2007, Climate Change 2007 Synthesis Report, Contribution of Work-
ing Groups 1, H and III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on
Climate Change [Core Writing Team, Pachauri, R.K and Reisinger, A.(eds.)], IPCC,
Geneva, Switzerland.
z Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 2007, "Summary for Policy -
makers" in Climate Change 2007 The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Wodcing
Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate
Change, 2007, Cambridge. United Kingdom and New York, NY, USAL: Cambridge
University Press, page 10.
1 -4
TOWN OF LOS G A T O S
L O S G A T O S S U S T A I N A B I L I T Y P L A N
INTRODUCTION
and slow their effects on natural ecosystems. The major efforts are described
in this section.
1. Federal Laws and Regulations
The United States has relatively limited federal regulations and policies relat-
ed to GHG emissions. However, in December 2009, the US Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) found that elevated concentrations of the six key
GHGs in the atmosphere, which are discussed further in Section A, endanger
the public health and welfare of current and future generations. These find-
ings were consistent and in compliance with the 2007 US Supreme Court de-
cision in Massachusetts vs. EPA, which found that the EPA can regulate
GHG pollution under the Clean Air Act. While the EPA's endangerment
finding does not automatically impose any requirements, it allowed EPA to
finalize GHG emission standards for light -duty vehicles in May 2010 and
heavy -duty vehicles in August 2011, which were developed in collaboration
with the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. Additionally, on
January 2, 2011, the EPA announced that it would regulate GHG emissions
from major stationary sources of GHGs, including oil refineries and fossil
fuel burning power plants, through modifications to the existing Clean Air
Act permitting programs.
2. State Laws and Regulations
California has been a leader among states in passing legislation to reduce
GHG emissions. Major laws and regulations are described below.
a. Energy Efficiency Standards (1978)
Title 24, Part 6 of the California Code of Regulations, Energy Efficiency
Standards for Residential and Nonresidential Buildings, was established in
1978 to address a legislative mandate to reduce the State's energy consump-
tion. The standards are updated roughly every three years to incorporate
new energy efficiency goals, methods, and technologies. The 2008 standards
went into effect on January 1, 2010, and require buildings to be approximate-
ly 15 percent more energy- efficient compared to the 2005 standards. These
standards are also discussed in Chapter 3.
1 -5
TOWN OF L O S G A T O S
L O S G A T O S S U S T A I N A B I L I T Y P L A N
INTRODUCTION
b. Clean Car Regulations (Assembly Bill 1493, 2002)
Assembly Bill (AB) 1493, Clean Car Regulations (commonly known as the
"Pavley law "), directed the California Air Resources Board (CARB) to adopt
regulations to decrease GHG emissions from new passenger vehicles and light
duty trucks beginning with the 2009 model year. Implementation of these
fuel efficiency standards, known as the "Pavley standards," was uncertain for
years due to EPA's denial of California's request for a waiver of Clean Air
Act Section 209(a), which was necessary to implement the Pavley standards.
However, in June 2009, the EPA granted California the authority to imple-
ment the standards. These standards are discussed further in Chapter 3.
c. Executive Order S -3 -05 (2005)
In 2005, Governor Schwarzenegger signed Executive Order S -3 -05, which
established the goals of reducing emissions to 2000 levels by 2010, to 1990
levels by 2020, and to 80 percent below 1990 levels by 2050. The Executive
Order identified the California Environmental Protection Agency (Cal /EPA)
as the lead coordinating State agency for establishing GHG emission reduc-
tion targets in California, and designated a "Climate Action Team," a multi -
agency group of State agencies, to implement Executive Order S -3 -05. GHG
emission reduction strategies and measures to reduce global warming were
identified by the California Climate Action Team in 2006.
d. Global Warming Solutions Act (AB 32, 2006)
In 2006, California Governor Schwarzenegger signed AB 32, the Global
Warming Solutions Act, into law. The Act requires that California cap its
GHG emissions at 1990 levels by 2020. AB 32 also requires that CARB iden-
tify discrete early actions to reduce emissions that could be implemented im-
mediately and develop a statewide scoping plan to identify how to meet the
emissions reduction targets.
CARB identified a list of nine early actions, including landfill methane gas
capture, the Low Carbon Fuel Standard (LCFS) that is discussed further in
Section B.2.e below, and a tire pressure program. CARB's Climate Change
Scoping Plan, adopted in December 2008, outlines regulations, market mech-
Wy
TOWN OF LOS G A T O S
L O S G A T O S S U S T A I N A B I L I T Y P L A N
I N T R O D U C T 1 0 N
anisms, and other actions to achieve the maximum technologically - feasible
and cost - effective reductions in GHG emissions by 2020. The Scoping Plan
recommends achieving a statewide energy mix with 33 percent from renewa-
ble energy sources, developing a California cap- and -trade program that will be
part of a regional carbon market through the Western Climate Initiative, and
expanding and strengthening existing energy efficiency programs and building
and appliance standards.
e. Executive Order S -01 -07 (2007)
Executive Order S- 01 -07, signed by Governor Schwarzenegger in 2007, estab-
lishes a LCFS for transportation fuels sold in California. This standard,
which is also discussed in Chapter 3, will reduce the carbon content of pas-
senger vehicle fuels in California by at least 10 percent by 2020.'
f. Regional Transportation and Land Use Planning Efforts (SB 375, 2008)
In 2008, California enacted Senate Bill (SB) 375 to augment AB 32 by promot-
ing efficient land use patterns and curbing sprawl. SB 375 establishes emis-
sions reduction goals for which regions can plan; encourages metropolitan
planning organizations (MPOs) to integrate their housing, transportation, and
regional land use plans with GHG reduction goals; and provides incentives
for governments and developers to implement compact and efficient growth
patterns. Under SB 375, the 18 MPOs in California must prepare a "sustaina-
ble communities strategy" to reduce the vehicle miles traveled (VMT) in their
regions and demonstrate their ability to reach the CARB targets. SB 375 also
includes incentives to create walkable and attractive communities and to revi-
talize existing communities. The legislation also allows developers to stream-
line environmental reviews under CEQA if they build projects consistent
with the new sustainable communities' strategies. SB 375 enhances CARB's
s On December 29, 2011, the US District Court for the Eastern District of
California issued several rulings in federal lawsuits challenging the LCFS. One of the
courts rulings preliminarily enjoins CARB from enforcing the regulation during the
pendency of the litigation. In January 2012, CARB appealed the decision and on
April 23, 2012, the Ninth Circuit Court granted CARB's motion for a stay of the
injunction while it continues to consider CARB's appeal of the lower court's decision.
1 -7
TOWN OF L O S G A T O S
L O S G A T O S S U S T A I N A B I L I T Y P L A N
INTRODUCTION
ability to reach the AB 32 goals by directing the agency in developing region-
al GHG emission reduction targets to be achieved from the transportation
sector for 2020 and 2035.
g. Heavy Duty Vehicle GHG Emissions Reduction Measure (2008)
In December 2008, CARB adopted the Heavy Duty Vehicle GHG Emission
Reduction Measure, which requires long -haul truckers to retrofit their trailers
with fuel efficient tires and aerodynamic devices. This requirement will im-
prove the fuel economy of heavy duty vehicles, reducing GHG emissions.
h. Sulfur Hexafluorfde Emissions Reductions Measures
In February 2010, CARB adopted regulations to reduce sulfur hexafluoride
emissions from semiconductor applications, and in January 2011, CARB be-
gan implementation of measures to reduce emissions of sulfur hexafluoride
from non - semiconductor applications. These measures include reporting and
reduction requirements for semiconductor operations as well as new re-
strictions on the use and sale of sulfur hexafluoride.
3. Regional Policies and Measures
The Bay Area Air Quality Management District ( BAAQMD) initiated the
regional Climate Protection Program in 2005. The Program includes a varie-
ty of measures, including outreach, data collection, and technical assistance,
among others, in an effort to move toward GHG reductions. In May of 2008,
BAAQMD adopted a first of its kind program to charge large stationary
sources for their GHG emissions. All pollution sources for which an air qual-
ity permit is required are now also required to estimate their GHG emissions
and pay a fee of $0.042 per metric ton of carbon dioxide equivalent
(MTCC 2e).
Consistent with SB 375, the Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG)
and the Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) have undertaken
efforts to link land use and transportation to GHG emission reduction goals
through a sustainable communities strategy. MTC has committed the Bay
W.
TOWN OF L O S G A T O S
LOS GATOS SUSTAINABILITY PLAN
I N T R O D U C T I O N
Area region, including Los Gatos, to a 15- percent reduction in GHGs by
2035.
4. Town Policies and Measures
In 2007, the Town formalized its commitment to take action to significantly
reduce global warming pollution by signing the "US Mayors Climate Protec-
tion Agreement." This Agreement, passed unanimously by the US Confer-
ence of Mayors, calls for taking action to meet or beat the GHG emissions
reduction target of 7 percent below 1990 levels by 2012.
In 2008, the Town passed a resolution adopting the Cities for Climate Protec-
tion Campaign (CCP) led by the International Council for Local Environ-
mental Initiatives (ICLEI) Local Governments for Sustainability. The CCP
helps local governments and communities to reduce GHG emissions and
their associated environmental impacts. Jurisdictions that join the CCP
commit to a five -step process:
1. Measure emissions of GHGs;
2. Commit to an emissions reduction target associated with a specific target
year;
3. Adopt specific measures or take specific actions, described in a local plan,
to reach the reduction target;
4. Implement the local plan; and
5. Monitor emissions reductions achieved by implementing the plan.4
This Sustainability Plan is Los Gatos' plan to accomplish the five steps above.
ICLEI Mitigation Programs, as described at http: //w .iclei.org/
index.php ?id = 10828, accessed May 3, 2012.
H L91
TOWN OF L O S G A T O S
L O S G A T O S S U S T A I N A B I L I T Y P L A N
I N T R O G U C T I O N
C. Sustainability Challenges
The effect of GHGs is one of the most critical challenges facing society today.
Overcoming these effects will require substantial efforts from government,
organizations, and individuals. Meeting Los Gatos' reduction target will re-
quire both persistence and adaptability. The Town needs to prioritize ac-
tions; mobilize residents, business owners, and staff; and work with neighbor-
ing jurisdictions and regional agencies to create workable solutions.
Like other communities in California and around the world, the Town of Los
Gatos faces a number of sustainability challenges, including the effects of
GHGs. This section describes sustainability challenges related to the sectors
covered in this Sustainability Plan.
1. Transportation and Land Use
During the second half of the 20" century, transportation and driving pat-
terns in the US shifted dramatically, with per- capita VMT increasing by
around 140 percent between and 1956 and 1998.5 This growth in VMT is the
result of increasing car trips and increasing average trip length. These increas-
es have been driven by a variety of factors, including changes in de-
mographics, land use, urban design, and public transportation systems.
As the proportion of two- income households grew and as jobs shifted to areas
further from the traditional urban core, lengthy car commutes became in-
creasingly common. This has been true of Los Gatos, as more residents work
farther afield in Silicon Valley and San Francisco. Over this same time peri-
od, changes in land use and in building and streetscape design likewise con-
tributed to increased car trips. Emphasis on the separation of uses and driver
convenience often came at the disadvantage of pedestrians and other non-
automotive users. As commercial areas became more disconnected from resi-
dential neighborhoods, it became less convenient to reach these destinations
by means other than a car. Auto - oriented designs, which can be unpleasant,
5 Puentes, Robert and Adie Tomer, 2008, The Road... Less Traveled* An Analy-
sis of Veluele Miles Traveled Trends in the U.S., Brookings Institution, Washington D.C.
1 -10
TOWN OF LOS G A T O S
L O S G A T O S S U S T A I N A B I L I T Y P L A N
I N T R O D U C T I O N
intimidating, or even dangerous for non - drivers, have made non - automotive
transportation modes more difficult and less appealing to use. Additionally,
public transit systems have seen their coverage decreased and their services
cut, and in some cases they been removed completely.
Because of the impediments created by development and design, driving is
often the only viable mode of transportation. Consequently, residents have
fewer opportunities for physical activity, and those who cannot drive, includ-
ing children, seniors, and disabled people, can have trouble accessing services.
2. Energy
Energy production is a major economic, security, and environmental chal-
lenge at the local, national, and global levels. Although Los Gatos receives its
energy from Pacific Gas & Electric Company (PG &E), which provides an
energy mix that is much cleaner than what many other US utilities provide, it
still relies on fossil fuels - coal, off, and natural gas - for about half of its ener-
gy. s
The US imports approximately 60 percent of its petroleum and 15 percent of
its natural gas from foreign countries, a dependence that makes our economy
and security vulnerable to political and resource instability in other parts of
the world.
The combustion of fossil fuels to produce heat or electricity, or to power in-
ternal combustion engines, is a main contributor to GHG emissions and oth-
er environmental problems. Because fossil fuels are found deep in the ground,
they must be extracted and transported to provide energy. Surface and
groundwater pollution can occur during extraction, storage, and transporta-
tion. Land subsidence can result when oil and gas are removed from below
ground with nothing left to support the land above. There is also the poten-
5 Pacific Gas and Electric website, http: / /www.pge.com /myhome/
environment /pge /clemenergy /, accessed on May 1, 2012.
1 -11
TOWN OF L O S G A T O S
L O S G A T O S S U S T A I N A B I L I T Y P L A N
INTRODUCTION
tial for storage tank leakage and oil spills during transportation, causing wide-
spread pollution and requiring costly cleanup efforts.
There are numerous strategies to reduce fossil fuel dependence and decrease
carbon emissions, which generally fall into three main categories:
♦ Energy Conservation. This is a quick and cost - effective strategy to re-
duce GHG emissions and decrease dependence on non- renewable sources
of energy. Strategies include land use patterns that increase walking and
bicycling, reducing electricity consumption, and efficient technologies
such as ENERGY STAR products that use less electricity, natural gas,
and water.
♦ Renewable and Alternative Energy Sources. These sources include so-
lar, wind, geothermal, biomass, and alternative vehicle fuels. In recent
years, increased research and development has been devoted to expanding
the supply and increasing the deployment of these sources.
♦ Carbon Capture and Storage. Carbon capture and storage includes
technological strategies to sequester carbon emissions from large pollu-
tion sources so that they don't enter the atmosphere.
3. Water
Though the 2010 -2011 water year brought some relief to drought conditions
in California, the winter of 2011 -2012 marked the fourth year of dry condi-
tions within the past five. The year 2009 featured the driest spring and sum-
mer on record, low water content in the Sierra snowpack, and a historic low
in the State's reservoir levels. In 2008, the Sacramento and San Joaquin River
systems that provide a large portion of the State's reservoir inflow were classi-
fied as Critically Dry. As of early 2009, the drought had damaged crops and
prevented farmers from planting or replanting 100,000 acres of agricultural
land, causing agricultural revenue losses of more than $300 million.' Such
drought conditions also threaten aquatic ecosystems, increase the risk of wild-
fires, increase food prices, and harm livelihoods dependent on agriculture,
' Office of the Governor, State of California, February 27, 2009, Press Re-
lease, Gov. Sclovarzenegger Takes Acaon to Address California's MterShortage.
1 -12
TOWN OF LOS G A T O S
L O S G A T O S S U S T A I N A B I L I T Y P L A N
INTRODUCTION
natural resources, and tourism. Responding to these wide - ranging impacts,
Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger proclaimed a State of Emergency in Feb-
ruary 2009, calling for an immediate 20 percent reduction in water use by
urban water users and the use of efficient water management practices by ag-
ricultural users.8
4. Solid Waste
The production and transport of consumer products creates large amounts of
GHGs. A large percentage of these products are disposed of after only one
use, requiring more raw materials to be extracted to replace these products.
Making new products or buildings from raw materials generally requires
more energy, uses more water, and creates more air and water pollution than
reusing materials or making the same product from recycled materials, there-
by increasing GHG emissions.
Once in the landfill, solid waste continues to emit GHGs, most notably me-
thane, which is approximately 21 times more potent than carbon dioxide in
terms of its global warming impacts .9 Landfills also release harmful contami-
nants such as vinyl chloride and benzene. In addition, the combination of
rainwater and other liquids with layers of solid waste at landfills produces
leachate, a harmful substance that contains contaminants such as benzene and
volatile halocarbons.10 Leachate causes soil, surface water, and groundwater
contamination. Poor management of solid waste operations can increase dis-
ease vectors and creates nuisances related to odor, litter, and dust.
The GHG emissions and other environmental problems associated with solid
waste can be reduced through increased diversion from landfills by reducing
consumption, reusing, and recycling. The Town of Los Gatos has made sig-
a Office of the Governor, State of California, February 27, 2009, Press Re-
lease, Gov. Schcvarzenegger Takes Action to Address California's VVater Shortage.
5 US Environmental Protection Agency website, http: / /v✓ .epa.gov/
outreach /scientific.html, accessed on May 1, 2012.
Ia US Environmental Protection Agency website, http: / /www.epa.gov/
waste /nonhaz/ municipal /landfill /bioreactors.htm, accessed on March 1, 2010.
1 -13
T O W N OF L O S G A T O S
L O S G A T O S S U S T A I N A B I L I T Y P L A N
I N T R O D U C T I O N
nificant strides in the area of waste diversion by exceeding State standards and
diverting 56 percent of its solid waste in its most recent certification by
CalRecycle. The Town has achieved these high diversion levels through a
variety of programs, such as recycling, including Downtown recycling recep-
tacles; construction waste salvage and reuse; and e -waste collection efforts. By
continuing these efforts and by implementing new programs, Los Gatos
stands to continue to make significant reductions to waste disposal.
5. Open Space
Los Gatos has approximately 1,940 acres of woodland /forestland in the
hillsides surrounding the Town, and 75 acres of agricultural land, including
orchards. The largest proportion of farmland acreage in the town is in the
North Forty area,° which contains orchard trees, including walnut (/uglans
sp.) and fruit trees. These open space areas can store carbon in the trees and
plants. Conversion of these open space lands to development can release
GHGs into the atmosphere.12 Development of forests or orchard land can
result in the release of nitrous oxide emissions from soil oxidation and carbon
dioxide emissions from removal of plant materials that store carbon.
D. Existing Sustainability Efforts in Los Gatos
The Town of Los Gatos has already initiated many plans and programs that
will improve sustainability in the town; this section describes these efforts.
1. Los Gatos 2020 General Plan
The Los Gatos 2020 General Plan has a strong emphasis on sustainability. In
particular, the Environment and Sustainability Element guides the Town in
making decisions that will conserve resources, reduce waste, and protect and
enhance natural resources and the environment by promoting the sustainabil-
n There is a Specific Plan application for the North Forty area that is currently
being reviewed by the Town.
12 International Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), 2006. IPCC Guidelines for
National Greenhouse Gas Inventories, and IPCC, 2000, Good Practice Guidance and
Uncertainty Management in National Greenhouse Gas Inventories.
1 -14
TOWN OF LOS G A T O S
L O S G A T O S S U S T A I N A B I L I T Y PLAN
INTRODUCTION
ity of resources and the Town's natural ecology for both current and future
generations. This Element also contains goals, policies, and actions designed
specifically to reduce GHG emissions, including Action ENV -13.1, which
directs the Town to prepare this Sustainability Plan.
2. Local Programs
The Town of Los Gatos has implemented a wide variety of programs to in-
crease sustainability. The Sustainability Plan would seek to create new pro-
grams as well as strengthen existing ones. The following is a partial list of Los
Gatos's sustainability efforts, with an emphasis on some of the most impact -
ful initiatives:
• International Council for Local Environmental Initiatives (ICLEI) Mem-
bership: In 2008, the Los Gatos Town Council voted to join ICLEI. By
becoming an ICLEI member, the Town committed to efforts to quantify,
monitor, and reduce its GHG emissions as part of the Cities for Climate
Protection Campaign.
• City Solar Award: In 2007, the Town of Los Gatos was honored with the
City Solar Award for its leadership and achievements in photovoltaic so-
lar installations.
• Waste Reduction: As mentioned above, the Town has exceeded State
standards by diverting 56 percent of its solid waste, per the Town's most
recent review by CalRecycle.
• Green Building: In 2008, the Town of Los Gatos adopted LEED and
GreenPoint rating systems as its green building standards and adopted a
LEED Silver standard for municipal construction and renovations.
• Biodiesel: All of the Town's heavy -duty, diesel - fueled vehicles and
equipment run on biodiesel.
• CaliforniaFIRST: Los Gatos participates in this statewide program that
helps fmance residential and commercial energy- efficiency improvements.
• Green Business Certification: Through the Town's formal efforts to
conserve resources, prevent pollution, and minimize waste in its opera-
tions, Los Gatos is certified as a Green Business by Santa Clara County.
1 -15
TOWN OF L O S G A T O S
L O S G A T O S S U S T A I N A B I L I T Y P L A N
INTRODUCTION
♦ PG &E's ClimateSmart Program: The Town's participation in this pro-
gram allowed it to offset all of its identified GHG emissions from munic-
ipal facilities, through support of forest planting and preservation. How-
ever, as of publication of this Sustainability Plan, this program recently
ended.
s Water Efficiency Landscape Ordinance: First adopted by the Town in
1992, and since updated to comply with the State's Model Water Efficient
Landscape Ordinance, this ordinance promotes conservation and efficient
use of water.
o Wood Burning Ordinance: This ordinance restricts the sale and use of
fireplaces and other wood - burning appliances that do not meet federal
EPA standards.
E Climate Change Adaptation
The Town of Los Gatos is a participant in ABAG's Multijurisdictional Local
Hazard Mitigation Plan for the San Francisco Bay Area. The Local Hazard
Mitigation Plan describes mitigation actions that the Town will implement in
order to "maintain and enhance a disaster - resistant region." The major haz-
ards covered by this plan include weather- related hazards that arc affected by
climate change, including flooding, landslides, wildfires, and drought, as well
as climate change itself. Therefore, this plan represents the strategies that the
Town will implement to adapt to the environmental changes that are antici-
pated to result from climate change.
F. Public Outreach and Participation
The Town has adopted multiple strategies to incorporate public participation
in various sustainability efforts, including the development of this Sustainabil-
ity Plan as described in this section.
1 -16
TOWN OF LOS G A T O S
L O S G A T O S S U S T A I N A B I L I T Y P L A N
I N T R O D U C T I O N
1. Los Gatos Growing Greener Together Campaign
The Los Gatos Growing Greener Together Campaign seeks to provide the
public with news regarding the Town's sustainability efforts, information on
how citizens can participate and contribute, and tips for making green choices
in their own lives and activities. The campaign publishes a regular newsletter
to publicize this information.
2. Sustainability Plan Community Workshop and Public Comment
Period
The Town held a Community Workshop on January 30, 2012 to discuss draft
sustainability targets and measures for this Sustainability Plan. The work-
shop included a formal presentation to acquaint participants with the princi-
ples of sustainability planning. Participants were given the opportunity to
view and comment upon comprehensive lists of potential communitywide
and municipal measures for GHG reduction, as well as to suggest other po-
tential measures. These comments served to influence which measures were
emphasized and included in the Sustainability Plan. Notes from the work-
shop are included as Appendix A.
Following this workshop, the Town initiated a three -week public comment
period during which members of the public could comment on the prelimi-
nary measures and suggest other measures. Suggestions received during this
comment period were incorporated into this Sustainability Plan.
1 -17
TOWN OF L O S G A T O S
L O S G A T O S S U S T A I N A B I L I T Y P L A N
I N T R O D U C T I O N
1 -18
2 EXISTING GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS INVENTORY
This chapter summarizes existing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in the
Town of Los Gatos resulting from the following sectors: transportation, resi-
dential and non - residential energy use, solid waste disposal, water and
wastewater, and other sources.
Los Gatos' baseline GHG inventory was compiled as a three -year average
(2006 to 2008) using the California Emissions Estimator Model (CalEEMod),
pursuant to the recommendations of the Bay Area Air Quality Management
District ( BAAQMD).' Between 2006 and 2008, Los Gatos's average annual
communitywide GHG emissions were 381,640 metric tons of carbon dioxide
equivalent (MTCD2e)- The results of the inventory are shown in Table 2 -1.
Appendix B provides the technical documentation for this inventory.
A. Transportation Emissions
Transportation sources of GHG emissions are a result of fuel combustion
from the burning of fossil fuels, including gasoline and diesel, and from on-
road mobile sources (e.g. passenger vehicles and trucks). Transportation
emissions are based on trips generated by land uses within Los Gatos. Trans-
portation emissions exclude "through trips" that have no origin or destination
within the town because the Town cannot affect the choices of these drivers.
Vehicle mile traveled (VMT) was compiled by Fehr & Peers for the Town of
Los Gatos for 2005. GHG emissions from the transportation sector are as-
sumed to be similar for year 2005 through 2008. GHG emissions from VMT
generated by land uses within the town were compiled using the California
Air Resources Board's (CARB) Emissions Factors 2011 (EMFAC2011) pro-
gram and are shown in Table 2 -2.
' Because energy use and water use fluctuate, BAAQMD recommends obtain-
ing a three -year average for these categories. This inventory reflects a three -year aver-
age for natural gas and purchased energy use, but three years of data was unavailable
for water use. A three -year average was also compiled for waste disposal.
2 -1
TOWN OF LOS G A T O S
L O S G A T O S S U S T A I N A B I L I T Y P L A N
EXISTING GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS INVENTORY
TABLE 2 -1 BASELINE COMMUNITYWIDE GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS
Notes: Emissions rounded to the nearest tens place.
EMFAC2011 based on VMT provided by Fehr & Peers.
"Natural gas and purchased energy provided by PG &E.
LGOP Landfill Gas Estimator Version L2 based on waste disposal obtained from CalRecy-
cle.
a LGOP Version 1.1 based on water /wastewater use in the town.
Estimate of stationary equipment use for agricultural, lawn and garden, light commercial,
and construction equipment using OFFROAD2007.
Source: The Planning Center I DC &E, 2011.
TABLE 2 -2 BASELINE COMMUNITYWIDE GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS
FROM TRANSPORTATION SOURCES
Vehicle Miles Traveled
GHG Emissions
Daily Annual MTCO2e /Year
1,766,310 519,080,770 248,150
Notes: Daily VMT is multiplied by 347 days /year to account for reduced traffic an weekends
and holidays, consistent with the CARB methodology within the Climate Change Seeping
Plan Measure Documentation Supplement. Emissions are rounded to the nearest tens place.
Source: EMFAC2011.
2 -2
GHG Emissions
(MTCO2e /Year)
Percent
of Total
Transportation'
248.150
65%
Residential°
69,170
18%
Non - Residential"
47,380
12%
Solid Waste Disposal`
10,060
3%
Water/Wastewater'
3,210
1°%
Other Emissions°
3,670
1°%
Total
381,640
100%
Notes: Emissions rounded to the nearest tens place.
EMFAC2011 based on VMT provided by Fehr & Peers.
"Natural gas and purchased energy provided by PG &E.
LGOP Landfill Gas Estimator Version L2 based on waste disposal obtained from CalRecy-
cle.
a LGOP Version 1.1 based on water /wastewater use in the town.
Estimate of stationary equipment use for agricultural, lawn and garden, light commercial,
and construction equipment using OFFROAD2007.
Source: The Planning Center I DC &E, 2011.
TABLE 2 -2 BASELINE COMMUNITYWIDE GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS
FROM TRANSPORTATION SOURCES
Vehicle Miles Traveled
GHG Emissions
Daily Annual MTCO2e /Year
1,766,310 519,080,770 248,150
Notes: Daily VMT is multiplied by 347 days /year to account for reduced traffic an weekends
and holidays, consistent with the CARB methodology within the Climate Change Seeping
Plan Measure Documentation Supplement. Emissions are rounded to the nearest tens place.
Source: EMFAC2011.
2 -2
TOWN OF LOS G A T O S
L O S G A T O S S U S T A I N I A B I L I T Y P L A N
EXISTING GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS INVENTORY
B. Residential Emissions
Residential land uses generate GHG emissions primarily from purchased elec-
tricity and natural gas used for heating and cooking. Pacific Gas and Electric
Company (PG &E) provided residential purchased energy use and natural gas
use for years 2006 to 2008. This data is shown in Table 2 -3.
C. Non Residential Emissions
The non - residential category includes GHG emissions associated with com-
mercial, office, and industrial land uses. Non - residential land uses generate
GHG emissions primarily from purchased electricity and natural gas used for
heating and cooking (e.g. restaurants). PG &E provided data on non-
residential purchased energy use and natural gas use for years 2006 to 2008, as
shown in Table 2 -4.
D. Solid Waste Disposal Emissions
Treatment and disposal of solid waste produces a significant amount of me-
thane. In addition, solid waste disposal sites produce biogenic carbon dioxide.
However, biogenic sources of GHG emissions are not included as part of a
communitywide GHG inventory pursuant to the methodology of
BAAQMD. Waste reduction, recycling, and reuse are the primary means by
which waste disposal can be reduced. Most operating landfills in California
also implement a landfill gas recovery system as a common way to reduce
methane emissions from solid waste disposal.
The California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery (CalRecy-
cle) maintains a disposal reporting system (DRS) to document waste disposal
z Burning wood is considered a biogenic source of carbon dioxide (a GHG) be-
cause the carbon is associated with recently living organic material. Biogenic sources
of GHG emissions are not included as part of a communitywide GHG inventory pur-
suant to the methodology of BAAQMD.
2 -3
TOWN OF LOS G A T O S
L O S G A T O S S U S T A I N A B I L I T Y P L A N
EXISTING GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS INVENTORY
TABLE 2 -3 BASELINE COMMUNITYWIDE GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS
FROM RESIDENTIAL LAND USES
GHG Emissions
Source Energy Usage MTCO2e /Year
Residential Building Purchased Energy 96,708,760 kWh 25,520
Residential Building Natural Gas 6,864,462 therms 43,650
Total 69,170
Notes: Based on the three -year average energy use from 2006 to 2008. Excludes properties
owned by another governmental entity that are outside the land use authority of the Town
of Los Gatos (e.g. County or Setejurisdietion). Based on PG &E's third -party verified GHG
emission factors. Emissions are rounded to the nearest tens place. "kWh" = kilowatt hours.
Source: PG &E, 2011, GHG Inventory Report for the Town of Los Gatos. Provided by John
Joseph, Green Communities and Innovator Pilots Program.
TABLE 2 -4 BASELINE COMMUNITYWIDE GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS
FROM NON- RESIDENTIAL LAND USES
GHG Emissions
Source Energy Usage Worts CO2e /Year
Non- Residential Building Purchased 106,638,269 kWh 28,180
Non - Residential Building Natural
3,018,720 therms 19,200
Gas
Total 47,380
Notes: Based on the three -year average energy use from 2006 to 2008. Excludes properties
owned by another government entity that are outside the land use authority of the Town of Los
Gatos (e.g. County or State jurisdiction). Based on PG &E's third -party verified GHG emission
factors. Emissions are rounded to the nearest tens place. "kWh" = kilowatt hours.
Source: PG &E, 2011, GHG Inventory Report for the Town of Los Gatos. Provided by John Jo-
seph, Green Communities and Innovator Pilots Program.
by jurisdiction and facility; this system was used to identify GHG emissions
from solid waste generated in Los Gatos. The system tracks solid waste dis-
posal and alternative daily cover (ADC) that is used as a temporary overlay
2 -4
TOWN OF L O S G A T O S
L O S G A T O S S U S T A I N A B I L I T Y P L A N
EXISTING GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS INVENTORY
on an exposed landfill face to reduce insects and vermin. Typical ADC mate-
rials include green materials, sludge, ash and kiln residue, compost, construc-
tion and demolition debris, and special foams and fabric; these materials con-
tribute to the total solid waste disposal documented for Los Gatos.
GHG emissions generated from solid waste disposal are estimated based on
methodology described by the International Panel on Climate Change
(IPCC). This method assumes that emissions of methane from waste deposit-
ed in a landfill are highest in the Hirst few years after deposition, and then
gradually decline as the degradable carbon in the waste is consumed by the
bacteria responsible for the decay.'
The Local Government Operations Protocol (LGOP) Landfill Emissions
Tool, Version 1.2 was used to calculate average annual GHG emissions from
communitywide waste disposed in a given year. Pursuant to BAAQMD's
methodology, a three -year average (2006 to 2008) was compiled. Between
2006 and 2008, Los Gatos disposed of an average of 22,666 tons of solid waste
and 8,045 tons of ADC, for a total disposal of 31,711 tons of solid waste. The
vast majority (approximately 75 percent) of solid waste generated by the town
is disposed at the Guadalupe Landfill, which has an active landfill gas collec-
tion and closed flare system.° A landfill gas control efficiency of 75 percent
was assumed based on the default value recommended by the LGOP. How-
ever, most large landfills, such as the Guadalupe Landfill, have clay or ge-
omembrane covers, which have a gas collection efficiency of 85 to 90 percent,
respectively.' Therefore, GHG emissions estimates for Los Gatos from waste
disposal are conservative. Table 2 -5 shows total GHG emissions from waste
disposal for the town.
' International Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), 2006, IPCC Guidelines for
National Greenhouse Gas Inventories.
' The Newby Island Landfill, which receives approximately 22 percent of the
waste from Los Gatos, also has a landfill gas capture system. Other landfills receive
less than 3 percent of the town's waste.
s BAAQMD, April 2008, Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Landfill Gas and Industrial,
Institutional, and Commercial Boilers, Steam Generators and Process Heaters. Prepared
by UR$ Corporation.
2 -5
TOWN OF L O S G A T O S
LOS GATOS SUSTAINAa1LITV PLAN
EXISTING GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS INVENTORY
E. WaterlWastewaterEmissions
Water demand and wastewater generation in Los Gatos result in indirect
GHG emissions associated with the energy required to convey, treat, and
distribute potable water and fugitive emissions of methane and nitrous oxide
from wastewater treatment. Table 2 -6 shows GHG emissions from the
town's water use and wastewater generation.
Wastewater treatment processes produce fugitive GHG emissions. Under
anaerobic conditions, microorganisms biodegrade soluble organic material in
wastewater during both nitrification and denitrification and generate nitrous
oxide emissions. These are shown in Table 2 -6 as Fugitive Emissions.
The majority of households and businesses in Los Gatos are connected to the
West Valley Sanitation Districts sanitary sewer system. Wastewater connect-
ed to the Sanitary sewer system in Los Gatos is treated at the San Jose /Santa
Clara Water Pollution Control Plant (WPCP). The San Jose /Santa Clara
WPCP is treated with an advanced tertiary system. Treated water is dis-
charged as fresh water through the Artesian Slough and into the South San
Francisco Bay. A smaller portion of households in the hillsides are on sepa-
rate septic tank systems; emissions from septic tank systems are also included
in Table 2 -6 e
F. Other Emissions
Other sources of GHG emissions include the combustion of fossil fuels for
stationary equipment (e.g. agricultural equipment and landscaping). This cat-
egory represents GHG emissions from off -road equipment exhaust; the calcu-
lation of emissions from this category is based on guidance from BAAQMD.
CARB's OFFROAD2007 model calculates these stationary Sources of
s For the purpose of this inventory, the percentage of residents connected to
septic tanks is assumed to represent no more than 10 percent of all housing units in
the town.
2 -6
TOWN OF L O S G A T O S
L O S G A T O S S L I S T A I N A B I L I T Y P L A N
EXISTING GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS INVENTORY
TABLE 2 -5 BASELINE COMMUNITYWIDE GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS
FROM WASTE DISPOSAL
Methane Fugitive Methane GHG
Generated Not Captured Emissions
(Metric Tons /Year) (Metric Tans /Year)a (MTCO2e /Year)
1,917 479 10,060
Notes: Bfogenic carbon dioxide is not included. Highest emissions occur approximately three
years after disposal. An aggregated three years of emissions was used to account for cumulative
disposal (waste -in- place). Emissions are rounded to the nearest tens place.
' Assumes a landfill gas control efficiency of 75 percent based on the LGOP.
Source: CARE, 2010, Landfill Emissions Tool, Version 1.2.
TABLE 2 -6
BASELINE COMMUNITYWIDE GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS
FROM WATER USE AND WASTEWATER GENERATION
Energy
Energy
Fugitive
Total GHG
(Megawatt
Emissions
Emissions
Emissions
Hours/
(MTCO2e/
(MTCO2e
(MTCO2e
Land Use
Year)'
Year)b
/Year)`
/Year)
Residential
7,222
1,890
860
2,760
Non - Residential 734
190
260
450
Total
7,957
2,090
1,130
3,210
Notes: Emissions are rounded to the nearest tens place; emissions do not always add up due to
rounding.
Energy associated with water conveyance, treatment, and distribution, and wastewater treat-
ment.
Based on GHG emission factors provided by PG &E.
`CARB, May 2010, LGOP, Version I.I. Assumes 10 percent of the town is on septic (resulting
in higher GHG emissions from anaerobic decomposition).
Source: Based on water demand and wastewater generation estimated in the Town of Los Gatos
General Plan Update Environmental Impact Report (March 2010).
emissions on a countywide level. Pursuant to BAAQMD guidance, station-
ary emissions for the Town of Los Gatos are estimated based on the percent-
age of the Santa Clara County inventory that represents the Town's GHG
emissions, as described below.
2 -7
TOWN OF L O S G A T O S
L O S G A T O S S U S T A I N A B I L I T Y P L A N
EXISTING GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS INVENTORY
1. Agricultural Equipment
Agricultural activities generate emissions from fuel used in off -road equip-
ment used in agricultural production, nitrogen added to managed soils, and
emissions of carbon dioxide from lime and urea containing fertilizers. GHG
emissions from agricultural equipment use within the town were estimated
based on the acres of existing agricultural land use identified in the Town of
Los Gatos 2020 General Plan compared to the total amount of land under
agricultural production in Santa Clara County. The General Plan indicates
that there are currently about 75 acres of farmland in Los Gatos. Due to the
small amount of area dedicated to agricultural production and the limited
intensity of the agricultural operations, GHG emissions from nitrogen and
carbon dioxide emissions from fertilizer application are nominal and are as-
sumed to represent less than 0.1 percent of the town's communitywide GHG
emissions inventory. Therefore, these GHG emissions are not included in
the inventory. However, an estimate of GHG emissions from the use of sta-
tionary equipment for agricultural areas is provided.
GHG emissions from agricultural off road equipment exhaust were estimated
using CARB's OFFROAD2007 program. GHG emissions are based on the
proportion of farmland acres in the town compared to farmland acres in San-
ta Clara County in 2008. Farmland acreage for Santa Clara County is based
on the County Department of Agriculture's 2010 Santa Clara County Agri-
cultural Report. Farmland acreage in Los Gatos is approximately 0.03 per-
cent of the total acreage under agricultural production in Santa Clara Coun-
ty.7
2. Lawn and Garden Equipment
Landscaping equipment used within Los Gatos generates stationary sources of
GHG emissions. GHG emissions from landscaping and garden off -road
equipment exhaust are estimated using CARB's OFFROAD2007 program.
7 County of Santa Clara, Department of Agricultural Resources, 2011. 2010
Santa Clara County Agricultural Crop Report.
2 -8
TOWN OF LOS G A T O S
L O S G A T O S S U S T A I N A B I L I T Y P L A N
EXISTING GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS INVENTORY
GHG emissions are based on the proportion of residential units in Los Gatos
compared to residential units in Santa Clara County in 2008.8
3. Light Commercial Equipment
Commercial land uses may generate GHG emissions from stationary equip-
ment, including generators, pressure washers, welders, and pumps. GHG
emissions from light commercial stationary equipment are estimated using
CARB's OFFROAD2007 program. GHG emissions are based on the pro-
portion of all employment in Los Gatos compared to all employment in San-
ta Clara County in 2008.°
4. Construction Equipment
Construction activities in Los Gatos generate GHG emissions from fuel used
in off -road equipment. GHG emissions from construction equipment ex-
haust are estimated using CARB's OFFROAD2007 program. GHG emis-
sions are based on the proportion of residential building permits issued in Los
Gatos compared to residential permits issued in Santa Clara County in 2008.10
5. Summary
Other sources of GHG emissions in Los Gatos based on CARB's OF-
FROAD2007 program summarized above are shown in Table 2 -7.
G. Sectors Not Included
1. Industrial GHG Emissions
Los Gatos does not have major industrial stationary point or area sources of
GHG emissions. Pursuant to a phone conversation with BAAQMD, the
8 Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG), 2009. San Francisco Bay Area
Housing Data, http: / /www.abag.ca. gov /pdfs /2009_Housing_Data.pdf.
Caltrans, 2008. Santa Clara County Economic Forecast, http: / /www.dot.ca.
gov/hq/tpp/offices/ote/socio—economic files/2008/Sa nta_Clara. pdf.
10 Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG), 2009. San Frandsco BayAr-
ea Housing Data, http: //v w.abag.ca .gov / pdfs /2009_Housing_Data.pdf. Assumes
non - residential building permits to be a similar percentage to residential permits.
2 -9
TOWN OF LOS G A T O S
L O S G A T O S S U S T A I N A B I L I T Y P L A N
EXISTING GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS INVENTORY
TABLE 2 -7 BASELINE COMMUNITYWIDE GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS
FROM OTHER EMISSIONS
Source
GHG Emissions
(MTCO2e /Year)
Agricultural Equipment
10
Lawn & Garden Equipment
690
Light Commercial Equipment
400
Construction Equipment
2,560
Total
3,670
Notes: Emissions are rounded to the nearest tens place; emissions do not always add up due to
rounding.
Source: CARB, OFF -Road 2007. Based on the emissions inventory for the County of Santa
Clara, Year 2008.
only stationary sources of emissions permitted by BAAQMD in the Town of
Los Gatos include gas stations, which are typically accounted for in the GHG
inventory's commercial (non - residential) sector.° Consequently, this sector is
not included in the town's GHG emissions inventory.
2. Carbon Stock /Carbon Sequestration
The carbon stock /carbon sequestration sector is traditionally included as
"other emissions." As described in Chapter 1, Los Gatos has approximately
1,940 acres of woodland /forestland and 75 acres of agricultural land, including
orchards.
n Young, Abby, Principal Environmental Planner, Bay Area Air Quality
Management District (BAAQMD), Planning and Research, Air Quality Planning.
Phone conversation with Nicole Vermillion, The Planning Center I DC &E, Septem-
ber 8, 2011.
2 -10
TOWN OF LOS G A T O S
L O S G A T O S S U S T A I N A B I L I T Y P L A N
EXISTING GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS INVENTORY
Perennial woody vegetation, such as forests and orchards, can store significant
carbon in long -lived biomass." Development of forests or orchard land can
result in the release of nitrous oxide emissions from soil oxidation and carbon
dioxide emissions from removal of plant materials that store carbon. If future
projects result in the removal of a significant amount of biomass that is not
planned for in the General Plan, then the net loss of such materials should be
accounted for or described in the project's GHG emissions inventory. How-
ever, future projects that are consistent with the General Plan and Sustainabil-
ity Plan would not be required to account for removal of biomass in the pro-
ject's inventory; only projects that are not consistent with the General Plan
(e.g. development in an area that the General Plan designates as open space)
would be required to account for biomass removal. Moreover, the amount of
biomass stored in forested and orchard areas of the town, including the North
Forty area, does not constitute a substantial portion of the town's GHG
emissions. Therefore, carbon stock from agricultural biomass is not included
in this GHG emissions inventory.
Inventories typically quantify carbon sequestration from forestlands when
identifying GHG emissions benefits that would result from protecting or
managing those forests. In the Town of Los Gatos, this sector does not repre-
sent a source (generator) of GHG emissions and specific information neces-
sary to calculate the GHG emissions benefits from the existing carbon stock,
such as the number and age of trees in the forests, is not known. However,
the vast majority of woodland /forestland in Los Gatos is in the hillsides and
is not proposed for development, meaning that it would remain unchanged at
buildout of the General Plan. Minor changes in vegetation from buildout of
the General Plan would be nominal. This sector is not included in this base-
line inventory, nor in the future GHG emissions forecast included in Chap-
ter 3, because adequate data is not available and because there would be no
change in carbon sequestration from forestlands in the foreseeable future.
" International Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), 2006. IPCC Guidelines for
National Greenhouse Gas Inventories; and IPCC, 2000, Good Practice Guidance and
Uncertainty Management in National Greenhouse Gas Inventories.
2 -11
TOWN OF LOS G A T O S
L O S G A T O S S U S T A I N A B I L I T Y P L A N
EXISTING GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS INVENTORY
3. Municipal Emissions
Emissions from Town government operations are a very small percentage of
the overall emissions within the border of Los Gatos. Therefore, the focus of
this Sustainability Plan is on the communitywide GHG emissions and on
measures to reduce those communitywide emissions. While this Plan in-
cludes measures that the Town will implement in order to reduce the emis-
sions from its municipal operations, such reductions will not significantly
affect the overall amount of GHGs emitted in Los Gatos, and the GHG emis-
sions reductions were not quantified. Because the reductions from municipal
measures were not quantified, the baseline municipal GHG emissions were
not quantified,
2 -12
3 2020 BUSINESS AS USUAL AND ADJUSTED GREENHOUSE GAS
EMISSIONS INVENTORY
This chapter summarizes forecasted greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in the
year 2020 in the Town of Los Gatos generated by the GHG sectors included
in the baseline emissions inventory. This chapter discusses two forecast year
scenarios: business as usual (BAU) conditions and conditions after adjusting
for known State and federal regulations and standards that will be in effect by
the year 2020.
In its Scoping Plan, the California Air Resources Board (CARB) defines BAU
as emissions levels that would occur if California continued to grow and add
new GHG emissions, but did not adopt any measures to reduce emissions.
Projections for each emission - generating sector for the town were compiled
and used to estimate emissions for 2020 based on 2008 emissions intensities.
Under CARB's definition of BAU, new growth in the town is assumed to
have the same carbon intensities as 2008. Los Gatos' projected population,
housing, non - residential building square footage, and employment in 2020
were identified in the 2010 General Plan Environmental Impact Report (EIR),
as shown in Table 3 -1. Technical documentation for the BAU and adjusted
forecasts is provided in Appendix B.
A. Business As Usual Forecast
Table 3 -2 identifies the baseline communitywide GHG emissions inventory
and 2020 BAU emissions projection for the town based on the assumptions
for the individual GHG emissions sectors described in Section C.
B. Adjusted Forecast
State and federal regulations have been adopted that will require reductions in
GHG emissions from a wide range of activities, including how energy is gen-
erated and how vehicle fuels are formulated. These GHG reductions will
occur regardless of any measures that the Town of Los Gatos implements in
its Sustainability Plan. Therefore, the BAU forecast can be adjusted to reflect
these reductions, which helps to demonstrate the extent of additional GHG
3 -1
TOWN OF L O S G A T O S
L O S G A T O S S U S T A I N A B I L I T Y P L A N
2020 BUSINESS AS USUAL AND ADJUSTED
GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS INVENTORY
TABLE 3 -1 EXISTING AND 2020 POPULATION, EMPLOYMENT, AND
HOUSING PROJECTIONS
EMFAC2011 based on VMT provided by Fehr & Peers.
b Natural gas and purchased energy provided by PG &E.
` LGOP Landfill Gas Estimator Version 1.2 based on waste disposal obtained from CalRecycle.
d LGOP Version 1.1 based on water /wastewater use in the town.
`Estimate of stationary equipment use for agricultural, lawn and garden, light commercial, and
construction equipment using OFFROAD2007.
Source: The Planning Center I DC &E, 2011.
3 -2
2008
Baseline
2020
Forecast
Change From
Existing
Population
28,810
32,600
3,790
Housing
12,130
13,730
1,600
Non Residential SF
4,081,350
5,024,560
943,210
Employment
18,820
21,480
2,660
Notes: SF —square feet.
Source: Town of Los Gatos, March, 2010, General Plan Update Envinmmenod Impact Report,
Table 3 -4 Housing, Population. and Job Growdi Under the Draft 2020 General Plan.
TABLE 3 -2 BASELINE AND FORECAST YEAR 2020 BUSINESS AS USUAL
COMMUNITYWIDE GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS
SUMMARY
2008
Baseline GHG
Emissions
(MTCO2e /Year)
2020
BAU GHG
Emissions
(MTCO2e /Year)
Increase
From
Baseline
(MTCO2e /Year)
Transportationa
248,150
290,180
42,030
Residential°
69,170
78,300
9,130
Non - Residential"
47,380
58,320
10,940
Solid Waste Disposal`
10,060
11,470
1,410
Water /Wastewaters
3,210
3,580
370
Other Emissionse
3,670
3,820
150
Total
381,640
445,670
64,030
EMFAC2011 based on VMT provided by Fehr & Peers.
b Natural gas and purchased energy provided by PG &E.
` LGOP Landfill Gas Estimator Version 1.2 based on waste disposal obtained from CalRecycle.
d LGOP Version 1.1 based on water /wastewater use in the town.
`Estimate of stationary equipment use for agricultural, lawn and garden, light commercial, and
construction equipment using OFFROAD2007.
Source: The Planning Center I DC &E, 2011.
3 -2
TOWN OF LOS G A T O S
L O S G A T O S S U S T A I N A B I L I T Y P L A N
2 0 2 0 B U S I N E S S AS U S U A L A N D A D J U S T E D
GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS INVENTORY
emissions reductions required by Town actions to achieve the Town's target,
as discussed further in Chapter 4.
Table 3 -3 identifies the adjusted forecast year 2020 GHG emissions inventory
based on State and federal GHG regulations and programs currently in place.
This adjusted forecast accounts for GHG reductions from the State and feder-
al regulations described below.
1. Pavley I - Clean Car Standards and Federal Corporate Average Fuel
Economy Standards
CARB adopted amendments to the "Pavley" standards (Assembly Bill [ABJ
1493) on September 24, 2009 to reduce GHG emissions from light duty vehi-
cles and trucks. The Pavley amendments affect passenger vehicles from 2009
to 2016 and require manufactures to achieve higher fuel efficiency standards.
The Pavley regulation is anticipated to reduce GHG emissions from new pas-
senger vehicles by 31.4 percent for the 2016 model year.'
On April 1, 2010, the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), in line
with the Pavley regulation, adopted federal Corporate Average Fuel Econo-
my (CAFE) standards for model years 2012 through 2016. On January 24,
2011, the US EPA, the US Department of Transportation, and the State of
California announced a single timeframe for proposing the fuel economy and
GHG standards for model years 2017 to 2025 passenger vehicles. However,
these additional reductions are not accounted for in the adjusted forecast be-
cause they are not yet adopted by CARB or EPA.
2. Low Carbon Fuel Standard
CARB identified the Low Carbon Fuel Standard (LCFS) as an early action
item in its Climate Change Scoping Plan, and adopted the LCFS regulation
on April 23, 2009; it became law on January 12, 2010. The LCFS requires a
' Based on a California fleet mix of 70 percent passenger cars and light duty
trucks (LDTI) and 30 percent light duty trucks (LDT2) as stated in CARB's 2008
Comparison of Greenhouse Gas Reductions under CAFE Standards and GARB Regu-
lations Adopted Pursuant to AB 1493.
3 -3
TOWN OF LOS G A T O S
LOS GATOS SUSTAINABILITY PLAN
2 0 2 0 B U S I N E S S AS U S U A L A N D A D J U S T E D
GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS INVENTORY
TABLE 3 -3 BASELINE AND ADJUSTED FORECAST YEAR 2020
COMMUNITYWIDE GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS SUMMARY
Total 381,640 328,620 -53,020
EMFAC2011 based on VMT provided by Fehr & Peers.
Natural gas and purchased energy provided by PG &E.
`LGOP Version 1.1 based on water /wastewater use in die town.
d LGOP Landfill Gas Estimator Version 1.2 based on waste disposal obtained from CalRecycle.
e Estimate of stationary equipment use for agricultural, lawn and garden, light commercial, and
construction equipment using OFFROAD2007.
Source: The Planning Center I DC &E, 2011,
reduction of at least 10 percent in the carbon intensity of California's trans-
portation fuels by 2020.
3. Renewable Portfolio Standard
A major component of California's Renewable Energy Program is the renew-
able portfolio standard (RPS) established under Public Utilities Code Article
16, Chapter 2.3, Part 1, Division 1 (Senate Bills [SB] 1078) and Public Utilities
Code Article 9, Chapter 3, Part 1, Division 1 (SB 107). Under the RPS, cer-
tain retail sellers of electricity were required to increase the amount of renew-
able energy each year by at least 1 percent in order to reach at least 20 percent
by December 30, 2010. CARB has now approved an even higher goal of 33
3 -4
2008
Baseline GHG
Emissions
(MTCO2e /Year)
2020
Adjusted GHG
Emissions
(MTCO2e /Year)
Decrease
from Baseline
(MTCO2e /Year)
Transportation'
248,150
222,060
-26,090
Residentialb
69,170
57,890
- 11,280
Non-Residential'
47,380
36,090
-11.290
Water /Wastewater`
3,210
2,440
-770
Solid Waste Disposald
10,060
6,700
-3,360
Other Emissions'
3,670
3,440
-230
Total 381,640 328,620 -53,020
EMFAC2011 based on VMT provided by Fehr & Peers.
Natural gas and purchased energy provided by PG &E.
`LGOP Version 1.1 based on water /wastewater use in die town.
d LGOP Landfill Gas Estimator Version 1.2 based on waste disposal obtained from CalRecycle.
e Estimate of stationary equipment use for agricultural, lawn and garden, light commercial, and
construction equipment using OFFROAD2007.
Source: The Planning Center I DC &E, 2011,
reduction of at least 10 percent in the carbon intensity of California's trans-
portation fuels by 2020.
3. Renewable Portfolio Standard
A major component of California's Renewable Energy Program is the renew-
able portfolio standard (RPS) established under Public Utilities Code Article
16, Chapter 2.3, Part 1, Division 1 (Senate Bills [SB] 1078) and Public Utilities
Code Article 9, Chapter 3, Part 1, Division 1 (SB 107). Under the RPS, cer-
tain retail sellers of electricity were required to increase the amount of renew-
able energy each year by at least 1 percent in order to reach at least 20 percent
by December 30, 2010. CARB has now approved an even higher goal of 33
3 -4
TOWN OF L O S G A T O S
L O S G A T O S S U S T A I N A B I L I T Y P L A N
2 0 2 0 B U S I N E S S AS U S U A L A N D A D J U S T E D
GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS INVENTORY
percent by 2020. Renewable sources of electricity include wind, small hydro-
power, solar, geothermal, biomass, and biogas. The increase in renewable
sources for electricity production will decrease indirect GHG emissions from
development projects because electricity production from renewable sources
is generally considered carbon neutral. According to CARB, Pacific Gas and
Electric Company (PG &E) served 15.9 percent of their electricity sales with
renewable power in 2010.
4. Smart Grid
The California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) has initiated a rulemak-
ing (R.08 -12 -009) to California investor owned electric utilities to develop a
smarter electric grid in the state. Pursuant to SB 17, the CPUC developed
requirements for a Smart Grid deployment plan. In July 2011, California
utilities, including PG &E filed ten -year Smart Grid deployment plans with
the CPUC. New Smart Meters provide real -time electricity use information
to consumers.
5. California Building Code
Energy conservation standards for new residential and nonresidential build -
ings were adopted by the California Energy Resources Conservation and De-
velopment Commission in June 1977 and most recently revised in 2008 (Title
24, Part 6 of the California Code of Regulations [CCR]). Title 24 requires
that the design of building shells and building components conserve energy.
The standards are updated periodically to allow for consideration and possible
incorporation of new energy efficiency technologies and methods. The 2008
Building and Energy Efficiency standards are approximately 15 percent more
energy- efficient than the 2005 Building and Energy Efficiency standards,
which were in place at the time of CARB's Scoping Plan. The California
Energy Commission anticipates that future code cycles (2014 and beyond)
may require a 30 percent increase in energy efficiency compared to the 2008
Building and Energy Efficiency Standards. However, these future cycles are
not included in the adjusted forecast because they are not yet codified.
3 -5
TOWN OF LOS G A T O S
L O S G A T O S S U S T A I N A B I L I T Y P L A N
2 0 2 0 B U S I N E S S AS U S U A L A N D A D J U S T E D
GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS INVENTORY
The 2006 Appliance Efficiency Regulations (Title 20, CCR Sections 1601
through 1608) were adopted by the California Energy Commission on Octo-
ber 11, 2006, and approved by the California Office of Administrative Law
on December 14, 2006. The regulations include standards for both federally
regulated appliances and non - federally regulated appliances.
On July 17, 2008, the California Building Standards Commission adopted the
nation's first green building standards. The California Green Building Stand-
ards Code (proposed Part 11, Title 24) was adopted as part of the California
Building Standards Code (Title 24, California Code of Regulations), known as
CALGreen. The 2010 edition of the code established voluntary standards on
planning and design for sustainable site development, energy efficiency (in
excess of the California Energy Code requirements), water conservation, ma-
terial conservation, and internal air contaminants. The mandatory provisions
of the code became effective January 1, 2011. CALGreen includes references
to the mandatory Building and Energy Efficiency Standards and includes vol-
untary Tier 1 and Tier 2 programs for cities and counties that wish to adopt
more stringent energy efficiency requirements that are 15 percent and 30 per-
cent more energy efficient than the 2008 standards, respectively. In addition,
CALGreen includes mandatory increases in indoor and outdoor water effi-
ciency for new building construction.
6. Waste Reduction
The adjusted forecast includes waste reductions from the Town's waste reduc-
tion and diversion programs that are required by Assembly Bill 939, the Cali-
fornia Integrated Waste Management Act of 1989. The percent reduction
from BAU is based on average annual historical reductions in waste disposal
over the last five years.
C. Sector Emissions
This section describes the assumptions for the individual GHG emissions
sectors.
3 -6
TOWN OF LOS G A T O S
L O S G A T O S S U S T A I N A B I L I T Y PLAN
2 0 2 0 B U S I N E S S AS U S U A L A N D A D J U S T E D
GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS INVENTORY
1. Transportation Emissions
Vehicle miles traveled (VMT) was compiled by Fehr & Peers for the Town of
Los Gatos for 2008 and 2020. GHG emissions from VMT generated by land
uses within the town were compiled using CARB's EMFAC2011 program
and are shown in Table 3 -4. The adjusted scenario includes GHG emissions
reductions from the Pavley fuel efficiency standards and the LCFS, which are
fuel and vehicle efficiency standards required by the State.
2. Residential and Non - Residential Emissions
The anticipated increase in residential and non - residential natural gas and en-
ergy use within the town is proportional to the anticipated increase in resi-
dential units and non - residential square footage by 2020. In order to estimate
the increase in GHG emissions in this sector, average energy per dwelling
unit and square foot was calculated based on existing energy demand for pur-
chased electricity and natural gas; this average energy per dwelling unit and
square foot was applied to the additional units and square feet projected in
2020. Table 3 -5 shows anticipated BAU and adjusted GHG emissions for
residential and non - residential uses in 2020. The adjusted scenario includes
GHG emissions reductions from the RPS, Smart Grid, and the Title 24 up-
dates.
3. Water /Wastewater Emissions
The increase in water demand and wastewater generation within the town is
based on projections of water demand and wastewater generation in 2020.
Table 3 -6 shows anticipated BAU and adjusted water demand and wastewater
generation and associated GHG emissions in 2020. The adjusted scenario
includes GHG emissions reductions from the RPS.
4. Solid Waste Disposal Emissions
The increase in solid waste disposal in the town is based on the projected in-
crease in residential and non - residential development in 2020. The General
Plan EIR forecasts a 13- percent increase in residential units and a 23- percent
increase in non - residential square footage. Existing waste from residential and
non - residential uses in the town is assumed to be proportional to the acreage
3 -7
TOWN OF LOS G A T O S
L O S G A T O S S U S T A I N A B I L I T Y P L A N
2 0 2 0 B U S I N E S S AS U S U A L A N D A D J U S T E D
GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS INVENTORY
TABLE 3 -4 2020 COMMUNITYWIDE GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS FROM
TRANSPORTATION SOURCES
Vehicle Miles Traveled 2020 BAU
2020 Adjusted
GHG Emissions
GHG Emissions
Daily Annual (MTCO2e /Year)
(MTCO2e /Year)
1,765,370 612,583,390 290,180
222,060
Notes: Daily VMT is multiplied by 347 days /year to account for reduced traffic on weekends
and holidays, consistent with the CARE methodology within the Climate Change Souping
Plan Measure Documentation Supplement. Emissions are rounded to the nearest tens place.
Source: EMFAC2011.
TABLE 3 -5 2020 COMMUNITYWIDE GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS FROM
RESIDENTIAL AND NON - RESIDENTIAL LAND USES
2020 BAU
2020
GHG
Adjusted GHG
Emissions
Emissions
Source (MTCO2e /Year)
(MTCO2e /Year)'
Residential Buildings 78,300
57,890
Non - Residential Buildings 58,320 36,090
Total 136,620 93,980
Notes: Excludes properties owned by another governmental entity that are outside the land use
authority of the Town of Las Gatos (e.g. County or State jurisdiction). Based on PG &E's third -
party verified GHG emission factors. Emissions are rounded to the nearest tens place.
' Based on PG &E's forecasted GHG emission rates in 2020.
Source: PG &E, 2011, GHG Inventory Report for the 7bwn of Los Gatos. Provided by John Jo-
seph, Green Communities and Innovator Pilots Program.
dedicated to residential and non - residential (i.e. commercial, office, and indus-
trial) uses in the town. The BAU communitywide inventory does not take
into account reductions in waste disposal from an increase in waste reduction
and diversion programs implemented by the Town. However, the adjusted
forecast includes a decrease in waste disposal in the Town based on historical
trends documented by CalRecycle from the Town's reduce, reuse, and recycle
M
Z
O
a
6'
Z
w
0
p r
O
3
Z y
Z
0
N z
z a
O N
r
W
� Q
Q
U O
C
LL
N
� Z
o O
2 y
Z
U a
� w
F �
ao w
a w
F p V
_z w
J Q �
m � 3
O z = Z
J y w N
LLp? N
O F ...
Z l9 m m
Ooo °
F J ry I-
0
N
a
° 0
p m
a a
FW E
O O
W
O
C
�y C
U�qO
rn
�
N
3 U
0
D s o
G � v
o S
d
00
9
O�Q
O
D C
(N
O
O
NO
W
A a o
O9
V
O
d
N
h
�
O � O
3
S z c v
o O a
o �
° o"1
d
d N
p
N
M
a V O OO
W
3 IN
H
° c 3
S
a o > 3
O� cad
m
� o
.a
3 a o 3
0
m C q
T O W N OF L O S G A T O S
L O S G A T O S S U S T A I N A B I L I T Y PLAN
2020 BUSINESS AS USUAL AND ADJUSTED
GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS INVENTORY
programs. Table 3 -7 shows anticipated BAU and adjusted waste disposal and
associated GHG emissions in 2020.
5. Other Emissions
Projections for 2020 for other emission sources are based on the estimates of
population and employment growth that are included in the General Plan.
e Agricultural Equipment. No increase in agricultural equipment use is
assumed.
e Lawn and Garden Equipment. Landscaping equipment use is assumed
to be proportional to population growth.
♦ Light Commercial Equipment. Stationary equipment from non-
residential land uses, including generators, pressure washers, welders, and
pumps, is assumed to be proportional to employment growth.
♦ Construction Equipment. The 2020 BAU forecast assumes similar use
of construction equipment as baseline conditions.
The BAU and adjusted forecast for other emissions is summarized in Table
3 -8. The adjusted forecast includes reductions from the LCFS.
3 -10
TOWN OF LOS G A T O S
L O S G A T O S S U S T A I N A B I L I T Y P L A N
2020 BUSINESS AS USUAL AND ADJUSTED
GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS INVENTORY
TABLE 3 -7 2020 COMMUNITYWIDE GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS FROM
WASTE DISPOSAL
2020
2020
2020
2020
BAU
BAU GHG
Adjusted
Adjusted GHG
Waste
Emissions
Waste
Emissions
Disposal
(MTCO2e/
Disposal
(MTCO2e/
Land Use (Tons)
Year)
(Tons)
Year)'
Residential 31,597
17,311
Non - Residential 3,443 1,886
Total 35,040 11,470 19,197 6,700
Notes: Assumes a landfill gas control efficiency of 75 percent based on the International Panel
on Climate Change's Local Government Operations Protocol. Biogenic carbon dioxide is not
included. Emissions are rounded to the nearest tens place.
' Based on the trend in waste reduction from reduce, reuse, and recycle efforts in the Town of
Los Gatos from 2007 through 2010.
Source: CARB, 2010, Landfill Emissions Tool, Version 1.2.
TABLE 3 -8 2020 COMMUNITYWIDE GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS FROM
OTHER EMISSIONS
2020 BAU 2020 Adjusted
GHG Emissions GHG Emissions
Source (MTCO2e/Year) (MTCO2e /Year)
Agricultural Equipment 10 10
Lawn and Garden Equipment 780 710
Light Commercial Equipment 460 410
Construction Equipment 2,560 2,310
Total 3,820 3,440
Note: Emissions are rounded to the nearest tens place: emissions do not always add up due to
rounding.
Source: CARE, OFFRoad 2007. Based on the emissions inventory for the County of Santa
Clara, Year 2008, proportioned for the Town of Los Gatos and projected based on the In-
crease in employment and population growth.
3 -11
TOWN OF LOS G A T O S
L O S G A T O S S U S T A I N A B I L I T Y P L A N
2020 BUSINESS AS USUAL AND ADJUSTED
GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS INVENTORY
3 -12
4 GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS REDUCT /ON TARGET
Pursuant to the greenhouse gas (GHG) reduction targets of Assembly Bill
(AB) 32 and the Bay Area Air Quality Management District's (BAAQMD)
recently adopted California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines,
a GHG reduction strategy, such as this Sustainability Plan, must establish a
communitywide GHG emissions target that meets one of the following op-
tions, which are based on AB 32's goals:
♦ Reduce GHG emissions to 1990 levels by 2020.
o Reduce GHG emissions by 15 percent below baseline (2008 or earlier)
emissions by 2020.
0 Meet the plan efficiency threshold of 6.6 metric tons of GHG emissions
per service population per year.
A. Los Gatos Target
This Sustainability Plan uses the second option presented by the BAAQMD
CEQA Guidelines: reduce GHG emissions by 15 percent below baseline
(2008 or earlier) emissions by 2020. Because accurate data on emissions in
1990 is not available, the target option that references 1990 levels is not ap-
propriate for this Plan. Although the third target option, which establishes a
per capita threshold, would be an acceptable target for this Sustainability
Plan, other documents and agencies lend support to the chosen option. The
California Air Resources Board's (CARB) Scoping Plan cites the target to
reduce GHG emissions by 15 percent from baseline conditions as a recom-
mended target. In addition, the California Attorney General and other agen-
cies and environmental groups have stated that a GHG reduction goal should
be measured in absolute magnitude of reductions, rather than a per capita
efficiency metric.
B. Target and Gap Analysis
This Sustainability Plan contains a range of measures in Chapter 5 that will
enable the Town to close the "gap" identified between 2020 adjusted emis-
4.1
TOWN OF LOS GATOS
LOS GATOS SUSTAINABILITY PLAN
G R E E N H O U S E G A S E M I S S I O N S R E D U C T I O N T A R G E T
sions forecast described in Chapter 3 and the GHG emissions reduction tar-
get.
For communities utilizing the target to reduce emissions by 15 percent from
baseline conditions, BAAQMD recommends that the baseline year be 2008 or
earlier in order to coincide with the targets of AB 32. In Los Gatos, this tar-
get means that the Sustainability Plan should include measures that will re-
duce GHG emissions by 57,250 metric tons of carbon dioxide emissions
(MTCO2e)' from baseline 2008 conditions by 2020, resulting in 324,390
MTCO2e'- in total emissions in 2020.
As described in the adjusted forecast in Chapter 3, State and federal regula-
tions will result in GHG emissions reductions, regardless of actions by the
Town. The adjusted forecast includes reductions associated with the Pavley
Clean Fuel Standards, Low Carbon Fuel Standard, Renewable Portfolio
Standard, Smart Grid, California Building Code, and the Town's waste diver-
sion and reduction programs. These existing GHG reduction programs and
regulations reduce GHG emissions from business as usual (BAU).
As shown in Table 4 -1, in order to achieve the GHG emissions reduction
target, this Sustainability Plan must include measures that will reduce BAU
emissions by 4,230 MTCO2e, in addition to what would be required by State
and federal regulations.
' This number was calculated by multiplying the baseline emissions described in
Chapter 2 (381,640 MTCO2e) by 0.15.
2 This number was calculated by subtracting the emissions reduction needed
(57,250 MTCO2e) from the baseline emissions (381,640 MTCO2e).
4.2
TOWN OF LOS GATOS
LOS GATOS SUSTAINAZILITY PLAN
G R E E N H O U S E G A S EMISSIONS R E D U C T I O N T A R G E T
TABLE 4.1 7-ARGET AND GAP ANALYSIS
2020 BAU 2020 Adjusted
GHG Emissions GHG Emissions
(MTCO2e /Year) (MTCO2e /Year)
Target (15% below baseline
GHG emissions) 324,390
Total GHG emissions 445,670 328,620
Gap 121,280 4,230
Source: The Planning Center I DC &E, 2012.
4.3
TOWN OF LOS GATOS
LOS GATOS SUSTAINABILITV PLAN
GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS REDUCTION TARGET
4.4
5 GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS REDUCTION MEASURES
This chapter presents the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions reduction
measures that the Town of Los Gatos will implement in order to achieve the
emissions reduction target for the year 2020. These measures were developed
with community involvement, including a Community Workshop held on
January 30, 2012 and a public comment period on the draft measures, during
which members of the public provided ideas for additional measures to in-
clude in the Sustainability Plan. Each measure is based on careful considera-
tion of the emissions reductions needed to achieve the reduction target, the
distribution of emissions revealed in the emissions inventory, existing priori-
ties and resources, and the potential costs and benefits of various potential
emission reduction projects.
The measures are divided into communitywide and municipal sections, and
then further divided into the following topics:
♦ Transportation and Land Use
♦ Green Building
♦ Renewable Energy and Low Carbon Fuels
e Energy Conservation
0 Water and Wastewater
e Solid Waste
o Open Space
e Purchasing
O Community Action
The measures were modeled using several models, including the Emissions
Factors 2011 Model (EMFAC2011), the Off -Road Emissions 2007 Model
(OFFROAD2007), the California Air Resources Board's (CARB) Landfill
Gas Emissions Tool (Version 1.2), and CARB's Local Government Opera-
tions Protocol (LGOP).
A. Communitywide Measures and Emissions Reductions Achieved
The sectors that are discussed below include measures that will reduce GHG
emissions from communitywide activities. In total, implementation of the
5 -1
TOWN OF L O S G A T O S
L O S G A T O S S U S T A I N A B I L I T Y P L A N
GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS REDUCTIONS MEASURES
communitywide measures will reduce GHG emissions by 7,450 metric tons
of carbon dioxide equivalent (MTCO2e) from the 2020 business as usual
(BAU) forecast. As discussed in Chapter 4, after adjusting for State and feder-
al measures, the Town would need to reduce its total GHG emissions by
4,230 MTCO2e by 2020 in order to meet the GHG reduction target. The
communitywide measures together exceed the reduction target. A sum-
mary of the reductions by sector is provided in Table 5 -1. The technical doc-
umentation for the modeling is provided in Appendices C and D. Appendix
E provides a summary of the measures and the key information about the
GHG emissions and VMT reductions presented in this chapter, along with
the implementation information presented in Chapter 6.
In the sections below, many measures are reported to have no measureable
reduction in GHG emissions beyond the other measures that were modeled.
This is because:
4 The measure is simply not quantifiable (e.g. Measure RE -7, Community
Choice Aggregation, for which there are a number of unknown varia-
bles).
♦ The measure would result in no measureable benefit or the benefit is too
small to be accurately calculated by modeling software.
There is another measure that is already quantified that achieves a similar
purpose. For example, Measure GB -1 requires that buildings be con-
structed to be 15 percent more energy-efficient than required by Title 24,
and there is a quantified GHG reduction associated with that measure.
Measure GB -3 provides incentives for LEED Silver certification, but this
alone would not increase the GHG emissions reduction that would result
from Measure G13-1, so no additional benefit is reported.
Throughout this chapter, the quantification for reductions is based on the
maximum achievable benefit.
5 -2
TOWN OF LOS G A T O S
L O S G A T O S S U S T A I N A B I L I T Y P L A N
GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS REDUCTIONS MEASURES
TABLE 5 -1 COMMUNITYWIDE GHG EMISSION REDUCTIONS BY SECTOR
TR -3 Fixed -Route Shuttle
929
Total
3 %c
TR -4 Bicycle Facilities and Programs
1,677
Reduction
Percent
TR -5 School Pool Program
VMT
in 2020
of Total
Sector
Reduction
(MTCO2e)
Reduction'
Transportation and Land Use
7,872
29 %c
TR -1 Support for Pedestrians, Bicyclists,
and Transit.
6.179
23 %c
TR -2 North Forty Area Land Uses
10,592
39 %c
TR -3 Fixed -Route Shuttle
929
3 %c
TR -4 Bicycle Facilities and Programs
1,677
6 %'
TR -5 School Pool Program
TR -6 Commute Trip Reduction Program
7,872
29 %c
TR -7 Student Transit Outreach
TR -8 Vehicle Circulation, Panting, and
Idling Reduction Programs
Total
27,249
3,430
46%
Green Building
GBA Green Building Ordinance
2,210
93%
GB -2 GreenPoint Rated Building
Guidelines
170
7%
Total
Z, 380
31%
Renewable Energy and Low Carbon
Fuels
RE -1 Alternative Energy Development
Plan
10
1%
RE -2 New Solar Homes Partnership
470
53%
RE -3 Renewable Energy Generation in
Projects
330
37%
Total
810
11%
5 -3
TOWN OF L O S G A T O S
L O S G A T O S S U S T A I N A B I L I T Y P L A N
GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS REDUCTIONS MEASURES
TABLE 5 -1 COMMUNITYWIDE GHG EMISSION REDUCTIONS BY SECTOR
(CONTINUED)
Sector
Total
Reduction
VMT in 2020
Reduction (MTCO2e)
Percent
of Total
Reduction'
Energy Conservation
EC -1 Energy Efficient Appliances and
Lighting
10
3%
EC -2 Promotion of Energy Conservation
30
9%
EC -3 Energy Efficient Outdoor Lighting
280
88%
Total
320
4%
Water and Wastewater
WW I Water Use and Efficiency
Requirements
70
14%
WW-2 Water Efficiency Retrofits and
Water Conservation Pricing
440
80%
Total
510
7%
Solid Waste
-
0%
Open Space
-
0%
Community Action
-
01y.
All Sectors Total
7,450
MTCO2e
Target Reduction
4,230
MTCO2e
Measures Exceed Target by
3,320
MTCO2e
' For each measure, the percent of the total GHG emissions reductions for that sector is provid-
ed. For each sector, the percent of the total GHG emissions reductions for the all local measures
in the Sustamability Plan is provided.
Certain measures interact or are grouped with one another; therefore this reduction reflects the
Impacts from multiple measures; no reductions are double,counted for die total.
` CAPCOA caps VMT reductions for particular measures or groups of measures. Therefore,
Individual percent reductions for Transportation /Land Use measures are only approximations.
Note: - indicates that there are no measurable reductions from the measures in this sector.
Source: Fehr & Peers and The Planning Center I DC &E, 2012.
5 -4
TOWN OF LOS G A T O S
L O S G A T O S S U S T A I N A B I L I T Y P L A N
GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS REDUCTIONS MEASURES
1. Transportation and Land Use
As shown in Table 5 -1, the transportation and land use measures would re-
duce GHG emissions in Los Gatos by a total of 3,430 MTCO2e.
Because the transportation and land use measures are interrelated and support
one another, an independent GHG reduction value cannot be calculated for a
single individual measure. Therefore, this analysis presents only the total
GHG reduction value for all of the measures in the transportation and land
use sector. However, the approximate contribution of a measure or a group
of measures to the total VMT reduction value for this sector can be estimated
based on model outputs. Therefore, each measure is followed by an estimated
reduction in VMT, with a note indicating if that particular measure was con-
sidered in conjunction with others. VMT reductions were calculated using a
VMT reduction estimation tool that utilizes data available in a 2010 report by
the California Air Pollution Control Officers Association ( CAPCOA) titled
Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Measures: A Resource for Local Gov-
ernment to Assess Emission Reductions from Greenhouse Gas Mitigation
Measures. CAPCOA also sets maximum VMT reductions from particular
measures or groups of measures. Because many measures work together to
reduce VMT, these VMT- reduction maximums serve to avoid double -
counting GHG reductions and account for decreasing marginal reductions as
additional, overlapping measures are implemented. For this reason, the per-
centage contributions of each measure to the sector total are approximations.
TR -1 SupportforPedestrians, Bicyclists and Transit
Promote walking, bicycling, and transit through the following:
a. Require all new buildings, excluding single -family homes, to include a
principal functional entry that faces a public space such as a street, square,
park, paseo, or plaza, in addition to any entrance from a parking lot, to
encourage pedestrian foot traffic.
b. Require new projects, excluding single -family homes, to include pedestri-
an or bicycle through - connections to existing sidewalks and existing or
future bicycle facilities, unless prohibited by topographical conditions.
5 -5
TOWN OF L O S G A T O S
L O S G A T O S S U S T A I N A B I L I T Y P L A N
GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS REDUCTIONS MEASURES
c. Seek grant funding to establish a Safe Routes to School (SR2S) Program
to increase more student walking and biking trips. The program may in-
clude: conducting school walking audits, improving nearby pedestrian
and bicycle facilities, implementing nearby traffic - calming measures, im-
plementing school bus, vanpool, and carpools to school, implementing
walking buses to schools, coordinating school schedules to not overlap
with peak commute times, conducting traffic studies for specific schools
for more efficient drop -off and pick -up activity at schools (e.g. staggered
schedules, changing on- street parking to loading zones, and more), and
increasing speed enforcement around schools.
d. Design and implernent affordable traffic - calming measures on specific
streets to dissuade Highway 17 cut - through traffic and attract pedestrian
and bicycle traffic.
e. Implement transit access improvements through sidewalk /crosswalk safe-
ty enhancements and bus shelter improvements.
VMT Reduction: Approximately 6,179 miles per year
Approximate Percentage Contribution to VMT Reductions in this sector: 23
percent
TR -2 North Forty Area Land Uses
Require a variety of local- serving commercial uses and encourage mixed -use
development in the North Forty area, reducing VMT.
VMT Reduction: Approximately 10,592 miles per year
Approximate Percentage Contribution to VMT Reductions in this sector: 39
percent
TR-3 Fixed -Route Shuttle
Provide a fixed -route shuttle system to the downtown area from key residen-
tial areas, employment and commercial centers, Vasona Light Rail, and
Vasona Park.
VMT Reduction: Approximately 929 miles per year
5 -d
TOWN OF L O S G A T O S
LOS GATOS SUSTAINABILITV PLAN
GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS REDUCTIONS MEASURES
Approximate Percentage Contribution to VMT Reductions in this sector:
4 percent
TR -4 Bicycle Facilities and Programs
Provide for new bicycle facilities and programs through the following:
a. Install new bicycle facilities throughout the existing Town street network
to close bicycle network gaps, as identified in General Plan.
b. Require bicycle parking facilities and on -site showers in major non-
residential development and redevelopment projects. Major development
projects include buildings that would accommodate more than 50 em-
ployees, whether in a single business or multiple tenants; major redevel-
opment projects include projects that change 50 percent or more of the
Square footage or wall space.
c. Install high quality bicycle puking facilities Downtown in centralized,
safe, and secure areas.
d. Encourage non - profit or volunteer organizations in creating a bicycle -
sharing program.
VMT Reduction: Approximately 1,677 miles per year
Approximate Percentage Contribution to VMT Reductions in this sector:
6 percent
TR -5 School Pool Program
Implement a School Pool Program that helps match parents to carpool stu-
dents to school.
VMT Reduction: Approximately 7,872 miles per year (in combination with
TR -6, TR -7, and TR -8)
Approximate Percentage Contribution to VMT Reductions in this sector:
29 percent (in combination with TR -6, TR -7, and TR -8)
TR -6 Vehicle Circulation, Parking, and Idling Reduction Programs
Support trip reduction and the use of electric vehicles through the following:
5 -7
TOWN OF L O S G A T O S
L O S G A T O S S U S T A I N A B I L I T Y P L A N
GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS REDUCTIONS MEASURES
a. Encourage a voluntary Employer Commute Trip Reduction Program for
new and existing development. This would be a multi strategy program
that encompasses a combination of individual measures, such as ride -
share programs, discounted transit programs, end -of -trip facilities (e.g.
showers and lockers), encouraging telecommuting, and preferential park-
ing permit programs. As part of this program, encourage employers to
allow commuters to pay for transit with pre -tax dollars.
b. Encourage new non - residential development to include designated or
preferred parking for vanpools, carpools, and electric vehicles.
c. Encourage non - profit or volunteer organizations in creating or providing
a car- sharing program.
VMT Reduction: Approximately 7,872 miles per year (in combination with
TR -5, TR -7, and TR -8)
Approximate Percentage Contribution to VMT Reductions in this sector.
42 percent (in combination with TR -5, TR -7, and TR -8)
TR-7 Student Transit Outreach
Coordinate with local school districts on marketing, promoting, and educat-
ing students about the benefits of using public transit as a mode of travel.
VMT Reduction: Approximately 7,872 miles per year (in combination with
TR -5, TR -6, and TR -8)
Approximate Percentage Contribution to VMT Reductions in this sector:
29 percent (in combination with TR -5, TR -6, and TR -8)
TR -8 Vehicle Circulation, Parking, and Idling Reduction Programs
Reduce vehicle circulation associated with parking and reduce vehicle idling
through the following:
d. Provide better wayfinding and smart parking strategies with attractive
signage to reduce vehicle circulation searching for parking spaces in the
C -2 /Central Business District Zone.
f:3
TOWN OF LOS G A T O S
L O S G A T O S S U S T A I N A B I L I T Y P L A N
G R E E N H O U S E G A S EMISSIONS R E D U C T I O N S MEASURES
e. Encourage non - profit and volunteer organizations in conducting out-
reach to reduce car idling around schools during pick -up and drop -off
times.
VMT Reduction: Approximately 7,872 miles per year (in combination with
TR -5, TR -6, and TR -7)
Approximate Percentage Contribution to VMT Reductions in this sector:
42 percent (in combination with TR -5, TR -6, and TR -7)
2. Green Building
As shown in Table 5 -1, the green building measures would reduce GHG
emissions in Los Gatos by 2,380 MTCO2e.
a. Quantified Measures
GB -1 Green Building Ordinance
Develop a Green Building Ordinance that requires energy- efficient design, in
excess of Title 24 standards, for all new residential and non - residential build-
ings. When developing the Ordinance, consider development -level thresholds
for when certain requirements are triggered.
o Require 30 percent above the 2008 Building and Energy Efficiency stand-
ards in Title 24 to coincide with the Voluntary Tier 2 standards of the
California Green Building Code (CALGreen).
♦ Encourage the use of cement substitutes and recycled building materials
for new construction.
GHG Emissions Reduction: 2,210 MTCO2e per year
GB -2 GreenPointRatedBuildingGuidelines
Require all new and significantly remodeled homes to follow the Town's
adopted GreenPoint Rated Building Guidelines. Significantly remodeled
homes include remodels of 50 percent or more of the square footage or wall
area of the home, and additions of 50 percent or more of the square footage
or wall area of the home.
GHG Emissions Reduction: 170 MTCO2e per year
5 -9
TOWN OF L O S G A T O S
L O S G A T O S S U S T A I N A B I L I T Y PLAN
G R E E N H O U S E G A S E M I S S I O N S R E D U C T I O N S MEASURES
b. Non - Quantified Measures
The following measures (GB -3 through 013-6) would not result in a measure -
able reduction in GHG emissions in Los Gatos beyond the other measures
modeled in this sector. However, they are important in helping to reach the
Town's overall goal of improving sustainability in Los Gatos.
GB -3 Incentives for Green Building Certification
Allow greater development flexibility and other incentives (e.g. permitting -
related) for LEED Silver certification or equivalent GreenPoint rating, for
example, by giving green projects priority in plan review and processing.
GB -4 Solar Orientation
Require measures that reduce energy use through solar orientation by taking
advantage of shade, prevailing winds, landscaping, and sun screens.
GB -5 Removal of Bai riers to Green Building
Identify and remove regulatory or procedural barriers to implementing green
building practices in the town, by updating codes, guidelines, and zoning.
GB -6 Regional Green Building Programs
Coordinate with other local governments, special districts, nonprofits, and
other public organizations to share resources, achieve economies of scale, and
develop green building policies and programs that are optimized on a regional
scale.
3. Renewable Energy and Low Carbon Fuels
As shown in Table 5 -1, the renewable energy and low carbon fuels measures
would reduce GHG emissions in Los Gatos by 810 MTCO2e.
a. Quantified Measures
RE -1 Alternative Energy Development Plan
In partnership with Pacific Gas and Electric and local alternative energy com-
panies, develop an Alternative Energy Development Plan that includes
townwide measurable goals and identifies the allowable and appropriate al-
ternative energy facility types within the town, such as solar photovoltaic
5 -10
TOWN OF LOS G A T O S
L O S G A T O S S U S T A I N A B I L I T Y P L A N
GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS REDUCTIONS MEASURES
(PV) on urban residential and commercial roofs. Propose phasing and timing
of alternative energy facility and infrastructure development. Provide the de-
velopment review process list /worksheet to new alternative energy projects
and conduct a review of Town policies and ordinances to address alternative
energy production. Identify optimal locations and the best means to avoid
noise, aesthetic, and other potential land use compatibility conflicts (e.g. in-
stalling tracking solar PV or angling fixed solar PV in a manner that reduces
glare to surrounding land uses). Consider further reducing permitting fees for
alternative energy development.
GHG Emissions Reduction: 10 MTCO2e per year
RE 2 New Solar Homes Partnership
Require that residential projects of six units or more participate in the Cali-
fornia Energy Commission's New Solar Homes Partnership, which provides
rebates to developers of six units or more who offer solar power in 50 percent
of new units and is a component of the California Solar Initiative, or a similar
program with solar power requirements equal to or greater than those of the
California Energy Commission's New Solar Homes Partnership.
GHG Emissions Reduction: 470 MTCO2c per year
RE3 Renewable Energy Generation in Projects
Require that new or major rehabilitations of commercial, office, or industrial
development greater than or equal to 20,000 square feet in size incorporate
solar or other renewable energy generation to provide 15 percent or more of
the project's energy needs. Major rehabilitations arc defined as remodel-
ing /additions of 20,000 square feet of office /retail commercial or 100,000
square feet of industrial floor area. Remove regulatory barriers to incorporat-
ing renewable energy generation.
GHG Emissions Reduction: 330 MTCO2e per year
5 -11
TOWN OF LOS G A T O S
L O S G A T O S S U S T A I N A B I L I T Y P L A N
GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS REDUCTIONS MEASURES
b. Non - Quantified Measures
The following measures (RE -5 through RE -7) would not result in a measure -
able reduction in GHG emissions in Los Gatos beyond the other measures
modeled in this sector. However, they are important in helping to reach the
Town's overall goal of improving sustainability in Los Gatos.
RE -4 Leaf Blower Ordinance
Consider adopting an ordinance to ban the use of two - stroke engine leaf
blowers. As part of this ordinance, establish planting and maintenance guide-
lines to reduce maintenance needs.
RE 5 Solar Ready Features
Where feasible, require that all new buildings be constructed to allow for the
easy, cost - effective installation of future solar energy systems. "Solar ready"
features should include: proper solar orientation (i.e. south facing roof area
sloped at 20° to 55° from the horizontal); clear access on the south sloped
roof (i.e. no chimneys, heating vents, or plumbing vents); electrical conduit
installed for solar electric system wiring; plumbing installed for solar hot wa-
ter system; and space provided for a solar hot water storage tank.
RE-6 Solar Energy Systems at Schools
Work with the local school districts to encourage the use of solar energy sys-
tems at school facilities.
RE -7 Community Choice Aggregation
Support and participate in regional efforts to study the feasibility and interest
in establishing community choice aggregation in Los Gatos.
As noted above, this measure would not result in a measureable reduction in
GHG emissions, mainly because there are a number of unknown variables
that would affect the outcomes of this measure. If Los Gatos were to partici-
pate in a community choice aggregation program, depending on the portfolio
of the energy provider, potential GHG emissions reductions could be signifi-
cant.
5 -12
TOWN OF L O S G A T O S
L O S G A T O S S U S T A I N A B I L I T Y P L A N
GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS REDUCTIONS MEASURES
4. Energy Conservation
As shown in Table 5 -1, the energy conservation measures would reduce GHG
emissions in Los Gatos by 320 MTCO2e.
a. Quantified Measures
EC-1 Energy- Ei£icientAppliances and Lighting
Require new development to use energy efficient appliances that meet EN-
ERGY STAR standards and energy- efficient lighting technologies that exceed
Title 24 standards by 30 percent.
GHG Emissions Reduction: 10 MTCO2e per year
EC-2 Promotion o£ Energy Conservation
Partner with Pacific Gas & Electric and other appropriate energy providers to
promote energy conservation, including the following, which would be pri-
marily funded by the energy providers:
0 Promote the purchase of ENERGY STAR appliances.
0 Distribute free compact fluorescent light (CFL) bulbs and /or fixtures to
community members.
0 Offer a halogen torchiere lamp exchange to community members.
0 Promote energy efficiency audits of existing buildings to check, repair,
and readjust heating, ventilation, air conditioning, lighting, water heating
equipment, insulation, and weatherization.
s Partner with the Silicon Valley Association of Realtors to encourage en-
ergy audits to be performed when residential and commercial buildings
are sold. Energy audits will include information regarding the opportu-
nities for energy efficiency improvements, and will be presented to the
buyer.
0 Commercial buildings to be °benchmarked" using the U.S. Environmen-
tal Protection Agency's (EPA) ENERGY STAR Portfolio Manager Tool,
consistent with Assembly Bill (AB) 1103, which requires disclosure of
commercial buildings' energy efficiency rating.
5 -13
TOWN OF L O S G A T O S
L O S G A T O S S U S T A 1 N A B I L I T V P L A N
GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS REDUCTIONS MEASURES
♦ Promote individualized energy management planning and related services
for large energy users.
Fund and schedule energy efficiency retrofits or "tune -ups" of existing
buildings.
♦ Pursue incentives and grants for energy conservation.
GHG Emissions Reduction: 30 MTCO2e per year
EC -3 Energy-E•fficient Outdoor Lighting
Require outdoor lighting fixtures to be energy- efficient. Require parking lot
light fixtures and light fixtures on buildings to be on full cut -off fixtures, ex-
cept emergency exit or safety lighting, and all permanently installed exterior
lighting shall be controlled by either a photocell or an astronomical time
switch. Prohibit continuous all night outdoor lighting in construction sites
unless required for security reasons. Revise the Town Code to include these
requirements.
GHG Emissions Reduction: 280 MTCO2e per year
b. Non- Quantified Measures
The following measures (EC -4 through EC -12) would not result In a measure -
able reduction in GHG emissions in Los Gatos beyond the other measures
modeled in this sector. However, they are important in helping to reach the
Town's overall goal of improving sustainability in Los Gatos.
EC -4 Kill A -Wait Electricity Usage Monitor Program
Continue the Kill -A -Watt Electricity Usage Monitor program, through which
residents can check out a device from the library that can be plugged in-
to household electronics to see how much electricity they require.
EC-5 Low - Income Weatherization
Seek funding to implement a low - income weatherization program.
EC-6 Quality Insulation Installation
5 -14
TOWN OF LOS G A T O S
L O S G A T O S S U S T A I N A B I L I T Y PLAN
GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS REDUCTIONS MEASURES
Provide links to and /or contact information on the Town's website for edu-
cation and outreach by outside organizations that promote quality insulation
installation (QII), which eliminates gaps in buildings.
EC -7 EnergyAudit Funding Sources
Compile a list of funding sources that local residents, businesses, or the Town
could potentially access to fund energy audits to inform homeowners and
businesses of opportunities to improve the energy efficiency of their homes
and buildings.
EC-8 CalifornlaFIRSTProgram
Continue participation in the CalifomiaFIRST program, which provides in-
novative, low- interest financing for energy efficiency projects for existing and
new development.
EC-9 Heat Island Mitigation Plan
Develop a "heat island" mitigation plan that requires cool roofs, cool pave-
ments, and strategically placed shade trees. Amend the applicable Design
Guidelines to integrate this requirement. Evaluate and balance tradeoffs be-
tween solar access and landscape tree shading in Design Guidelines.
EC -10 Heat Gain Reduction
Require all new development and major rehabilitation (i.e. additions or re-
models of 20,000 square feet of office /retail commercial or 100,000 square feet
of industrial floor area) projects to incorporate any combination of the fol-
lowing strategies to reduce heat gain for 50 percent of the non -roof impervi-
ous site landscape, which includes roads, sidewalks, courtyards, parking lots,
and driveways: shaded within five years of occupancy; paving materials with a
Solar Reflectance Index (SRI) of at least 29; open grid pavement system; and
parking spaces underground, under deck, under roof, or under a building.
Any roof used to shade or cover parking must have an SRI of at least 29.
EC 11 Programmable Thermostats
Encourage the installation of programmable thermostats in existing residen-
tial and commercial buildings.
5 -15
TOWN OF LOS G A T O S
L O S G A T O S S U S T A I N A B I L I T Y P L A N
GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS REDUCTIONS MEASURES
EC -12 Energy Conservation through Design Outreach
Form a volunteer committee of local design professionals to create a brochure
to educate citizens on how to save energy through design.
5. Water and Wastewater
As shown in Table 5 -1, the water and wastewater measures would reduce
GHG emissions in Los Gatos by 510 MTCO2e.
a. Quantified Measures
WWI Water Use and Efficiency Requirements
For new development, require all water use and efficiency measures identified
as voluntary in the California Green Building Standards Code, and consider
more stringent targets. California Green Building Standards Code require-
ments include: 1) reduce indoor potable water use by 20 percent after meeting
the Energy Policy Act of 1992 fixture performance requirements, and 2) re-
duce outdoor potable water use by 50 percent from a calibrated mid - summer
baseline case, for example, through irrigation efficiency, plant species, recy-
cled wastewater, and captured rainwater. Establish Town requirements for
discretionary projects regarding watering timing, water - efficient irrigation
equipment, water - efficient fixtures, and offsetting demand so that there is no
net increase in imported water use. Include clear parameters for integrating
water conservation infrastructure and technologies, including low -flush toilets
and low -flow showerheads. As appropriate, partner with local water conser-
vation companies on the development and implementation of this measure.
GHG Emissions Reduction: 70 MTCO2e per year
WW-2 Water Efficiency Retrofits and 6i iterConservationPricing
Promote water efficiency and conservation through the following:
a. Adopt a water efficiency retrofit ordinance that requires upgrades as a
condition of issuing permits for renovations or additions. Work with lo-
cal water purveyors to achieve consistent standards and review and ap-
proval procedures for implementation.
5 -16
TOWN OF LOS G A T O S
LOS GATOS SUSTAINABILITV PLAN
GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS REDUCTIONS MEASURES
b. Work with the San Jose Water Company (SJWC) and Santa Clara Valley
Water District (SCVWD) to adopt water conservation pricing, such as
tiered rate structures, to encourage efficient water use. As part of this
measure, the water districts would conduct the following:
0 Provide notices in each billing to accounts with water use budgets
showing the relationship between the budget and actual consumption.
♦ Encourage wholesale water suppliers to provide financial incentives to
their retail water agency customers that encourage water conservation
efforts.
0 Work with SJWC to meter with commodity rates for all new connec-
tions, and retrofit existing connections.
♦ Create accounts with dedicated irrigation meters, or develop and im-
plement a strategy targeting and marketing large landscape water use
surveys to commercial /industrial /institutional accounts with mixed -
use meters to help monitor landscaping water use.
GHG Emissions Reduction: 440 MTCO2e per year
b. Non - Quantified Measures
The following measures (WW -3 through WW -6) would not result in a
measureable reduction in GHG emissions in Los Gatos beyond the other
measures modeled in this sector. However, they are important in helping to
reach the Town's overall goal of improving sustainability in Los Gatos.
WW-3 Bay Friendly Landscaping
Require new development to use native plants or other appropriate non-
invasive plants that are drought- tolerant, as described in the Bay Friendly
Landscaping Guidelines, available at StopWaste.org and BayFriendlyCoali-
tion.org.
5 -17
TOWN OF LOS G A T O S
L O S G A T O S S U S T A I N A B I L I T Y P L A N
GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS REDUCTIONS MEASURES
WW-4 Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance Update
Review and update the Town's Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance with
improved conservation programs and incentives for non - residential customers
that are consistent with the Tier I water conservation standards of Title 24.
WW-5 Water Audit Programs
In collaboration with efforts by the San Jose Water Company (SJWC) and the
Santa Clara Valley Water District (SCVWD), promote water audit programs
that offer free water audits to single - family, multi - family, large landscape ac-
counts, and commercial customers. Collaborate with purveyors to enact con-
servation programs for commercial, industrial, and institutional (CII) ac-
counts and create programs to install ultra -low -flush toilets in facilities.
WW -6 Rainwater Collection Policy
Encourage residential rainwater collection and consider updating the Zoning
Code or other code amendments as needed to encourage and support permit-
ting and regulation of residential rainwater systems.
6. Solid Waste
As described in Chapter 3, the adjusted 2020 forecast includes waste reduc-
tions from the Town's waste reduction and diversion programs that are re-
quired by AB 939, the California Integrated Waste Management Act of 1989.
Through continued implementation of these programs and compliance with
this legislation, GHG emissions from solid waste generated in Los Gatos are
projected to decrease by 4,770 MTCO2e from 2020 BAU.
The solid waste measures included in this section will support these programs,
but will not further reduce GHG emissions from solid waste generated in Los
Gatos beyond what was estimated in the adjusted forecast.
SW-1 Construction Waste Diversion
Revise the existing construction and demolition ordinance to require at least
50 percent diversion (i.e. reuse or recycling) of non - hazardous construction
waste from disposal.
5 -18
TOWN OF L O S G A T O S
L O S G A T O S S U S T A I N A B I L I T Y P L A N
GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS REDUCTIONS MEASURES
SW-2 Recycling AreasMMulti- FamilyDevelopments
Require all new and significant redevelopments /remodels of existing multi-
family developments to provide recycling areas for their residents within ex-
isting trash areas. Significant redevelopments and remodels include those that
add or change 50 percent or more of the square footage or wall area.
SW-3 Salvaged, Recycled- Content, and Local Construction Materials
Encourage the use of salvaged and recycled- content materials and other mate-
rials that have low production energy costs for building materials, hard sur-
faces, and non -plant landscaping. Require sourcing of construction materials
locally, as feasible.
SW-4 Food and Green Waste
Work with public and private waste disposal entities to keep food and green
waste out of landfills.
SW-5 Recycling and Composting incentives
Work with public and private waste disposal entities to incentivize recycling
and composting.
SW-6 Downtown Recycling Containers
Continue to provide recycling containers in the Downtown area.
SW-7 Waste Reduction Outreach
Expand educational programs to inform residents about reuse, recycling,
composting, waste to energy, and zero waste programs.
SW-8 Plastic Bag Ordinance
Adopt an ordinance to ban the use of plastic bags in Los Gatos.
SW-9 Purchasing of Recycled Materials
Develop policies, incentives, and design guidelines that encourage the public
and private purchase and use of durable and nondurable items, including
building materials, made from recycled materials or renewable resources.
5 -19
TOWN OF L O S G A T O S
L O S G A T O S S U S T A I N A B I L I T Y P L A N
GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS REDUCTIONS MEASURE S
SW -10 Additional Waste Diversion
Aim to achieve the 75 percent waste diversion goal established by AB 341.
7. Open Space
The open space measures would not result in measureable reductions in GHG
emissions in Los Gatos. However, they are important in helping to reach the
Town's overall goal of improving sustainability in Los Gatos.
OS -I Community Garden and Urban Farm Sites Inventory
Identify and inventory potential community garden and urban farm sites on
public easements, Pacific Gas & Electric Company (PG &E) easements, right -
of -ways, and schoolyards, and develop a program to establish community
gardens in appropriate locations.
OS -2 Gar den Areas in New Development
Encourage significant new residential developments over 50 units to include
space that can be used to grow food.
OS -3 Community Garden Process
Establish a process through which a neighborhood can propose and adopt a
site as a community garden.
OS -4 Los GatosFarmers'Market
Continue to support the Los Gatos Farmers' Market as a source for locally -
grown food.
OS -5 Public Food Benefits at the Farmers' Market
Encourage the Los Gatos farmers' market to accept food stamps and other
public food benefits.
OS -6 Wildland Fire Prevention
Continue to actively pursue wildland fire prevention in forested areas of Los
Gatos to avoid loss of carbon sequestration.
5 -20
TOWN OF L O S G A T O S
L O S G A T O S S U S T A I N A B I L I T Y P L A N
GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS REDUCTIONS MEASURES
8. Community Action
The community action measures would not result in measureable reductions
in GHG emissions in Los Gatos. However, they are important in helping to
reach the Town's overall goal of improving sustainability in Los Gatos.
CA -1 Local Business Participation
Develop and implement an outreach plan to engage local businesses in GHG
emissions reduction programs.
CA -2 Sustainabilitylnformation Center
Establish and maintain a "sustainability information center' at the Town Hall
or Library to inform the public and distribute available brochures, and pro-
vide information on sustainability on the Town's website. Emphasize online
outreach materials to minimize paper consumption.
CA -3 Los Gatos: Growing Greener Together Campaign
Continue the Los Gatos: Growing Greener Together Campaign, which pro-
vides Town employees and community members with a newsletter featuring
green tips and best practices for home and at work. Expand this program to
provide best practice information at public venues, such as the farmers' mar-
ket.
CA -4 Support for Local Businesses
Continue economic vitality programs aimed at supporting local business by
encouraging residents to shop locally.
CA -5 Support for Voluntary Programs
Support voluntary programs to improve sustainability, in Los Gatos.
B. Municipal Measures
The measures that are discussed below include measures that will reduce
GHG emissions from Town operations. However, because the Town's oper-
ations represent such a small percentage of the total GHG emissions in Los
5 -21
TOWN OF L O S G A T O S
L O S G A T O S S U S T A I N A B I L I T Y P L A N
GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS R E DUCT' IO NS MEASURES
Gatos, as discussed in Chapter 2, the overall GHG emissions reductions
would be minimal, and were therefore not quantified. Although these
measures would have a minimal reduction in GHG emissions in Los Gatos
overall, they demonstrate that the Town is committed to action on climate
change. Los Gatos is proud of the emission reduction efforts implemented to
date and is committed to building on those efforts by increasing fleet fuel effi-
ciency, increasing energy efficiency and conservation in municipal buildings,
and other actions described below.
1. Transportation and Land Use
TR-I Reduced Emissions from Employee Commute
Implement programs and provide incentives to encourage reduced emissions
from employee commute, including telecommuting, alternative work sched-
ules, carpooling /vanpooling, and active transportation.
TR-2 Support for Bicycle Commuting
Provide bicycle lockers and showers at Town offices, as well as education
about bicycle commuting.
TR -3 Bicycles for Use by Town Employees
Provide bicycles for short trips by Town employees.
TR-4 IncentivesforLow-Emission Vehicles
Provide preferential parking for low emissions vehicles at Town offices.
TR -5 Idling in Town Vehicles
Adopt a policy to limit idling in Town vehicles consistent with public safety
standards.
TR-6 E£ficlencyin Town Fleet Vehicles
Regularly maintain Town fleet vehicles to maximize efficiency (e.g. tire pres-
sure).
5 -22
TOWN OF LOS G A T O S
L O S G A T O S S U S T A I N A B I L I T Y P L A N
GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS REDUCTIONS MEASURES
2. Green Building
GB -I LEED Certification in Municipal Buildings
Encourage all new municipal buildings and facilities to meet at least LEED
Gold certification standards.
GB -2 Rebates andlncentives for EnergyEfficiency
Utilize all available rebates and incentives for energy efficiency and distribut-
ed generation installations, such as State public good programs (i.e. funding
for energy efficiency from a "public good" fee on utility bills) and solar pro-
grams.
GB -3 Green Building Training
Train all plan review and building inspection staff in green building materials,
techniques, and practices.
3. Renewable Energy and Low Carbon Fuels
RE -1 Solar Enetgy for Town Facilities
Conduct a solar feasibility study and install solar panels on appropriate Town
facilities.
RE-2 Solar Water Heating at Town Facilities
Install tankless and /or solar water heating at appropriate Town facilities.
RES Town Fleet Conversion
Where technologically feasible and consistent with public safety standards,
convert the Town's vehicle fleet to hybrid, compressed natural gas, biodiesel,
electric, hydrogen fuel cells, or ethanol.
RE-4 Fuel Conservation Program
Establish a fuel conservation program for the Town vehicle fleet and require
Gas Cap driver training for all employees who use fleet vehicles.
5 -23
TOWN OF L O S G A T O S
L O S G A T O S S U S T A I N A B I L I T Y P L A N
GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS REDUCTIONS MEASURES
4. Energy Conservation
EC -1 Energy Audit of Town Facilities
Conduct, with assistance from Pacific Gas & Electric Company, a thorough
energy audit of all Town facilities to identify cost - effective opportunities for
conservation.
EC -2 Reflective Roofing on Town Facilities
Install reflective roofing on Town facilities.
EC -3 Energy Efficiency Standards for Town Facilities
Establish energy efficiency standards for Town facilities and provide employ-
ees with guidelines, instructions, and requirements for efficient use of facili-
ties.
EC -4 Peak Electricity Demand Reduction
Participate in peak electricity demand reduction programs and undertake
peak demand reduction measures at Town facilities.
EC -5 Energy -Efficient Appliances and Office Equipment
As outdated electronic appliances and office equipment are phased out of
Town facilities, replace them with energy efficient models.
EC -G Street and Traffic Light Retrofits
Continue to retrofit street lights and traffic lights to light emitting diodes
(LED).
5. Water and Wastewater
WWI Water- ConservingFfxturesin Town Facilities
Install water- conserving fixtures in all Town facilities.
WW-2 Landscaping at Town Facilities
Use drought - tolerant native landscaping at Town facilities.
5 -24
TOWN OF L O S G A T O S
L O S G A T O S S U S T A I N A B I L I T Y P L A N
GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS REDUCTIONS MEASURES
WW-3 Irrigation for Town Landscaping
Use recycled water or graywater for Town landscaping, including parks and
medians, where appropriate.
6. Solid Waste
SW-I Recycling Coordinators
Train an existing staff member from each Town department to be a recycling
coordinator for their department.
SW-2 Reuse and Recycled ContentMaterials
Require all Town departments and facilities to reuse office supplies, furniture,
and computers before buying new materials. When buying new materials,
require Town departments and facilities to purchase products that are made
with high levels of post- consumer recycled content and have limited packag-
ing.
7. Open Space
CSI Tree Planting on Municipal Property
Develop a Town program for maximizing carbon sequestration on municipal
property through tree planting.
8. Purchasing
P -1 Local Hiring
Develop a Town program to require or encourage the Town to hire locally
for its contracts and services.
P-2 Sustamability Criteria in Proposal Selection Process
When requesting proposals or applications for contracts, professional service
agreements, or grants, request that proposals or applications include infor-
mation about the sustainability practices of the organization, and use such
information as a partial basis for proposal evaluations.
5 -25
TOWN OF LOS G A T O S
L O S G A T O S S U S T A I N A B I L I T Y P L A N
GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS REDUCTIONS MEASURES
P -3 Life -Cycle Costing Approach in Purchasing
Incorporate a "life -cycle costing' approach into Town purchasing considera-
tions that takes into account long -term cost savings from energy- efficient
products.
9. Community Action
CA4 Green Business Program
Continue to operate a townwide green business program.
CA -2 SustainabilityCoordinator
Train an existing Town staff member to be a sustainability coordinator for
the Town.
CA -3 Incentives for Sustainable Business Practices
Reward local businesses that hire local residents and allow telecommuting by,
for example, recognition on the Town website or in Town newsletters, or
preference in Town purchasing.
5 -26
6 IMPLEMENTATION AND MONITORING
The previous chapters present and analyze reduction measures that will ex-
ceed the Town's target of reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in Los
Gatos by 15 percent below baseline levels by 2020. These measures represent
the hard work and initiative of the Town of Los Gatos to go above and be-
yond normal practice by proactively addressing the effects of GHGs. This
chapter outlines how the measures will be implemented, as well as financing
and monitoring mechanisms to implement the measures.
A. Measure Implementation
This section presents implementation information for each measure, includ-
ing action items, responsible parties, cost effectiveness, and a schedule for im-
plementation. In cases where an individual measure includes many different
components, such as many of the transportation and land use measures, im-
plementation information is provided for each component separately. The
quantitative reduction effects, as reported in Chapter 5, serve as the standards
by which performance towards achievement of the reduction target will be
measured.
The implementation schedule separates reduction measures into two main
time periods for implementation: 2012 to 2015 and 2015 to 2020. Phases indi-
cate when implementation of the measure begins. A third time period from
2012 to 2020 is also applied for implementation to account for parts of
measures that were feasible in 2012 to 2015 and those that were not feasible
until 2015 to 2020. Overall maintenance of the program will extend well be-
yond the allotted phase. The implementation schedule prioritizes reduction
measures based on their effectiveness at reducing GHG emissions, cost -
effectiveness, and /or feasibility. Some reduction strategies are expected to be
implemented on a later timeline due to obstacles of available data, technology,
or finances.
Appendix E provides a summary of the measures and the key information
about the GHG emissions and VMT reductions presented in Chapter 5, along
with the implementation information presented in this chapter.
6 -1
TOWN OF L O S G A T O S
L O S G A T O S S U S T A I N A B I L I T Y P L A N
I M P L E M E N T A T I O N A N D M O N I T O F I N G
1. Communitywide Measures
a. Transportation and Land Use
TR-la Emphasis on Pedestrian Entrances
Measure TR -la requires all new buildings, excluding single - family homes, to
include a principal functional entry that faces a public space such as a street,
square, park, paseo, or plaza, in addition to any entrance from a parking lot,
to encourage pedestrian foot traffic.
i. Action Items and Responsible Parties
To implement this measure, the Town will amend the Municipal Code and
Design Guidelines to include this requirement. New residential and non-
residential development, except for single - family homes, will be subject to
this requirement, incorporating it either into the project design or as mitiga-
tion in the applicable environmental document pursuant to the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). In addition, the Community Devel-
opment Department will review architectural plans for consistency with this
measure.
J1 . Cost Effectiveness :Moderate toHigh
Staff -time costs of measure TR -la are expected to be moderate and would
stem from the need to draft, adopt, and implement ordinances. Since measure
TR -la would apply only to new structures, pedestrian - serving entrances could
be incorporated into buildings during their design phase. Incorporating such
an entrance or otherwise orienting a building to meet this requirement would
therefore impose little to no additional cost for most developments. In rare
instances, additional entrances could cause reductions in usable floor or wall
space, or generate greater security or climate - control demands; however, es-
timating these possible costs would be highly speculative. Cost savings from
this measure could stem from reduced parking needs or from increased vitali-
ty in the Town's commercial districts, but these also are highly speculative.
While it is not possible to reliably quantify direct GHG reductions from this
individual measure, the measure greatly increases convenience for pedestrians
and potentially cyclists, thus encouraging alternative forms Of transportation
and reducing vehicle miles traveled (VMT). Though its individual reductions
6 -2
TOWN OF L O S G A T O S
LOS GATOS SUSTAINABILITV PLAN
I M P L E M E N T A T I O N A N D M O N I T O R I N G
are not precisely quantifiable, the measure's benefits would likely be readily
observable and, most notably, its costs are anticipated to be minimal. There-
fore this measure is deemed to have a moderate to high degree of cost -
effectiveness.
M. Implementation Schedule
The Town will begin implementing this measure during the 2012 -2015 phase.
TR -1b Pedestrian or Bicycle Connections
Measure TR -lb requires new projects, excluding single- family homes, to in-
clude pedestrian or bicycle through- connections to existing sidewalks and
existing or future bicycle facilities, unless prohibited by topographical condi-
tions.
J . Action Items and Responsible Parties
To implement this measure, the Town will amend the Municipal Code and
Design Guidelines to include this requirement. New residential and non-
residential development, except for single - family homes, will be subject to
this requirement, incorporating it either into the project design or as mitiga-
tion in the applicable environmental document pursuant to CEQA. In addi-
tion, the Community Development Department will review development
applications for consistency with this measure.
ii. Cost Effectiveness: Moderate to High
Staff -time costs of measure TR -lb are expected to be moderate and would
stem from the need to draft, adopt, and implement ordinances. The costs of
this measure will vary depending on the individual site characteristics and
intended layout of new developments. Even for developments with low con-
nectivity, the amount of land needed to provide such connections would rare-
ly exceed 1 percent of the total development area, and could be considerably
6 -3
TOWN OF L O S G A T O S
LOS GATOS SUSTAINABILITY PLAN
I M P L E M E N T A T I O N A N D M O N I T O R I N G
lower.' If properly incorporated during the design phase, this requirement
would result in negligible increases to development costs. While it is not pos-
sible to reliably quantify direct GHG reductions from this individual meas-
ure, the measure greatly increases convenience for pedestrians and cyclists,
thus encouraging alternative forms of transportation. Though its individual
reductions are not precisely quantifiable, the measure's benefits would likely
be readily observable and, most notably, its costs are anticipated to be mini-
mal. Therefore this measure is deemed to have a moderate to high cost-
effectiveness.
iii. Implementation Schedule
The Town will begin implementing this measure during the 2012 -2015 phase.
TR -Ic Safe Routes to School
Measure TR -lc directs the Town to seek grant funding to establish a Safe
Routes to School (SR2S) Program to increase student walking and biking
trips.
L Action Items and Responsible Parties
To implement this measure, the Town and school districts will apply for
grant funding for a SR2S program, and if accepted, develop and implement
the program by constructing pedestrian and bicycle improvements and in-
stalling signage and lighting.
ii. Cost Effectiveness: High
Direct costs for measure TR -lc are expected to be low and would stem from
staff time devoted to the pursuit and administration of pertinent grant fund-
ing. See the discussion for Measure TR -4a for information about the costs
associated with bicycle facilities. Costs associated with pedestrian facilities are
i This estimate is based on example from a low- density, suburban neighbor-
hood in Austin, Texas, where a pedestrian /bicycle throughway provided access be-
tween two low - connectivity streets. At 20 feet across, the right -of -way was relatively
wide. The total footprint of the throughway was 4,300 square feet, or about 0.7 per-
cent of the total 600,000 square foot area of the blocks it directly served.
6 -4
TOWN OF LOS G A T O S
L O S G A T O S S U S T A I N A B I L I T Y P L A N
I M P L E M E N T A T I O N A N D M O N I T O R I N G
highly dependent upon the types and extent of new pedestrian infrastructure,
so it is impossible to accurately predict the total costs of the improvements
that would be included. However, plan costs from other Bay Area municipal-
ities can be instructive. Santa Rosa estimated the cost of implementing its
planned pedestrian improvements to be approximately $4.3 million total, It
is presumed that all costs of any SR2S Program would be largely or fully cov-
ered by awarded grants, such as the following federal grant programs: Trans-
portation Enhancement Program, Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality
Improvement Program, and Highway Safety Improvement Program.
Though the individual reductions from this measure are projected to be low,
given its low anticipated costs, this measure is deemed to be moderately to
highly cost - effective.
iii. Implementation Schedule
The Town will begin implementing this measure during the 2012 -2015 phase.
TR -I d Traffic Calming Measures
Measure TR -Id directs the Town to design and implement affordable traffic -
calming measures on specific streets to dissuade Highway 17 cut - through traf-
fic and attract pedestrian and bicycle traffic.
i. Action Items and Responsible Parties
To implement this measure, the Town will design traffic calming measures
and construct them as appropriate.
it CostEfiectivenesa: Low
Measure TR -Id would result in relatively high staff -time costs for program
development and administration, as well as considerable costs from construc-
tion and maintenance of infrastructure as part of measure implementation. In
its 2012 Climate Action Plan, the City of Walnut Creek estimated the costs of
traffic calming measures at approximately $83,000 per 10 miles of roadway,
with costs split between the City and private developers.2 Total costs for Los
A345.
z City of Walnut Creek, 2012. City of Walnut Creek Climate Action Plan, page
6 -5
TOWN OF LOS G A T O S
L O S G A T O S S U S T A I N A B I L I T Y P L A N
I M P L E M E N T A T I O N A N D M O N I T O R I N G
Gatos will depend on the traffic calming methods used, the extent of their
implementation, and the proportion of costs assigned to developers. Signifi-
cant direct cost - savings for the Town are not anticipated; however, the Town
could potentially experience indirect benefits or savings from reduced air pol-
lution and increased pedestrian comfort and safety. Given the measure's high
anticipated cost and relatively low projected VMT reduction, it is deemed to
have low cost - effectiveness.
iii. Implementation Schedule
The Town will begin implementing this measure during the 2015 -2020 phase.
TR -le Transit Access Improvements
Measure TR -le directs the Town to implement transit access improvements
through sidewalk /crosswalk safety enhancements and bus shelter improve-
ments.
i. Action Items and Responsible Parties
To implement this measure, the Town will construct pedestrian safety and
other improvements to transit access.
If. Cost Effectiveness: Low
Measure TR -le would result in moderate staff -time costs for program devel-
opment and administration, as well as considerable costs from construction
and maintenance of infrastructure as part of measure implementation. Vari-
ous estimates are available for potential measure costs. The 2011 Sustainabil-
ity Action Plan for the City of Tracy estimated a cost of $5,000 to $8,000 per
shelter for transit stop upgrades and $6 per square foot of new sidewalk.' In
its 2012 Draft Climate Action Plan, the City of Santa Rosa estimated a
citywide program cost of between $200,000 and $500,000. San Ramon esti-
mated citywide costs ranging between $15,000 and $75,000.° Implementation
costs for Los Gatos will depend on the number and type of transit -stop up-
grades performed. While the Town is not anticipated to experience direct
'City of Tracy, 2010. City of Tracy Sustainability Action Plan.
'City of San Ramon, 2011. City of San Ramon Climate Action Plan.
6 -6
TOWN OF L O S G A T O S
L O S G A T O S S U S T A I N A B I L I T Y PLAN
I M P L E M E N T A T I O N A N D M O N I T O R I N G
cost - savings as a result of measure implementation, indirect benefits and sav-
ings could potentially be realized through decreased congestion and air pollu-
tion, and increased rider safety. Given this measure's high anticipated cost
and relatively low projected VMT reduction, it is deemed to have a low cost -
effectiveness.
iii. Implementation Schedule
The Town will begin implementing this measure during the 2015 -2020 phase.
TR -2 North Forty Area Land Uses
Measure TR -2 requires a variety of local- serving commercial uses and encour-
ages mixed -use development in the North Forty area.
I . Action Items and Responsible Parties
To implement this measure, the Town will work with the North Forty de-
velopment team to ensure that local- serving commercial uses are included,
and to encourage mixed -use development. The North Forty development
project will amend the land use plans, as appropriate, to comply with this
measure.
A Cost Effectiveness: High
Staff -time costs of measure TR -2 are expected to be low and would stem from
the need to coordinate with the North Forty development team to ensure
consistency with this measure. Measure TR -2 is particular to Los Gatos and
would not impose any direct additional implementation costs on the Town.
Any costs associated increased provision of municipal infrastructure or ser-
vices would likely be offset by increased property and sales tax receipts
and /or covered by developers. Developers could be faced with higher total
development costs given requirements for more intense land uses, but these
are anticipated to be consistent with construction costs for other similar de-
velopments. Moreover, more intense development in this area could help to
defray costs for both the Town and developers by providing for greater over-
all efficiency and economies of scale. Overall, the low costs of this measure
would likely be more than offset by increases to revenue and by the public
6 -7
T O W N OF L O S G A T O S
L O S G A T O S S U S T A I N A B I L I T Y P L A N
I M P L E M E N T A T I O N A N D M O N I T O R I N G
benefit of additional housing, jobs, and services. Given its potential for both
increased Town revenue and VMT reduction, this measure is deemed to be
highly cost - effective.
iii. Implementation Schedule
Assuming that the North Forty Specific Plan process continues to move for-
ward, the Town will begin implementing this measure during the 2012 -2015
phase.
TR -3 Fixed -Route Shuttle
Measure TR -3 directs the Town to provide a fixed -route shuttle system to the
downtown area from key residential areas, employment and commercial cen-
ters, Vasona Light Rail, and Vasona Park.
1. Action Items and Responsible Parties
To implement this measure, the Town will develop and implement a fixed -
route shuttle system.
A Cost Effectiveness: Low
Costs stemming from measure TR -3 would largely depend on its specific im-
plementation, with staff -time costs dependent upon how shuttle system de-
sign and roll -out are approached. With contracted or Santa Clara Valley Val-
ley Transportation Authority (VTA) -run services, staff -time costs would be
dramatically lower than in the unlikely event that the Town were to design
and /or manage its own system. VTA provides contracted corporate shuttle
services between light -rail stations and key employers at a cost of about
$44,000 per year as of 2012.' These services, however, are dissimilar from
typical, fully public shuttle -bus services serving transit stations and down-
town areas. The City of Walnut Creek estimated in their 2012 Climate Ac-
tion Plan that providing Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART) shuttles would car-
ry a City cost of $0 millions Shuttles in Los Gatos would likely be similar to
' Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority, 2011. Adopted Biennial Budg-
et: Fiscal Years 2012 and 2013.
6 City of Walnut Creek, 2012. City of Walnut Creek Climate Action Plan.
'i3:1
TOWN OF L O S G A T O S
L O S G A T O S S U S T A I N A B I L I T Y P L A N
I M P L E M E N T A T I O N A N D M O N I T O R I N G
those of Walnut Creek and carry costs of a comparable magnitude. Given
that this measure carries a relatively high cost and that its VMT reduction,
though measurable, is very small, it is deemed to have a low cost - effectiveness.
11i. Implementation Schedule
The Town will begin implementing this measure during the 2015 -2020 phase.
TR-4a New Bicycle Facilities
Measure TR -4a directs the Town to install new bicycle facilities throughout
the existing Town street network to close bicycle network gaps.
1. Action Items and Responsible Parties
To implement this measure, the Town will construct new bicycle facilities.
ii. Cost Effectiveness: Low
Planning and administration for the installation of new bicycle facilities under
measure TR -4a could carry low to moderate staff -time costs. The total cost of
new bike facilities would depend on the number and type of facilities in-
stalled. The cost discussion for TR -4b includes information on estimated cost
ranges for different types of bicycle parking. For its Bicycle Master Plan, the
City of Santa Rosa made cost estimates for various classes of bikeway. Class I
bicycle routes consist of trails exclusively for bicycles and /or pedestrians;
these carry estimated construction costs of $550,000 per mile, with annual
maintenance costs of $10,000 per mile. Class II bicycle routes comprise dedi-
cated bike lanes along existing roadways; these carry estimated construction
costs of $30,000 per mile, with annual maintenance costs of $2,000 per mile.
Class BI bicycle routes are characterized by shared roadways with bicycle
route signage and sometimes pavement stencils; these carry construction costs
of $2,500 per mile, with annual maintenance costs of $1,000 per mile. These
costs do not include additional infrastructure such as bike signals, crossings,
and loop detectors, and vary considerably by specific location. The estimated
total cost to implement the bicycle portion of the Bicycle and Pedestrian Mas-
. S
TOWN OF LOS G A T O S
L O S G A T O S S U S T A I N A B I L I T Y P L A N
IMPLEMENTATION AND MONITORING
ter Plan for the City of Santa Rosa was $38.9 million." Alternatively, the
City of Lafayette, which is of a similar size to Los Gatos, had higher average
per -mile costs for the various types of bikeways it planned to construct. The
total cost of implementing Lafayette's Bicycle Master Plan was estimated at
$12.7 million (in 2006 dollars), with an additional ten -year maintenance costs
of $832,659 annually (in 2016 dollars)
The Town of Los Gatos would not likely see direct cost savings as a conse-
quence of implementing this measure; however, indirect savings could be real-
ized through decreased congestion and air population from resultant trans-
portation mode trips. A precise quantification of such benefits, however, is
not feasible. Given this measure's high anticipated costs and relatively low
projected VMT reduction, it is deemed to have a low cost - effectiveness.
iii. Implementation Schedule
The Town will begin implementing this measure during the 2015 -2020 phase.
TR -4b Bicycle Facilities in Development Projects
Measure TR -4b requires bicycle parking facilities and on -site showers in ma-
jor non - residential development and redevelopment projects.
i. Action Items and Responsible Parties
To implement this measure, the Town will amend the Municipal Code to
include this requirement. Significant new non - residential development and
redevelopment will be subject to this requirement, incorporating it either into
the project design or as mitigation in the applicable environmental document
pursuant to CEQA. In addition, the Community Development Department
will review development applications for consistency with this measure.
'City of Santa Rosa, 2010. City of Santa Rasa Bike and Pedestrian itlaster Plan.
s All costs from Santa Rosa Plan are in 2008 dollars.
e City of Lafayette, 2006. Lafayette Bikeways Master Plan.
6 -10
TOWN OF LOS G A T O S
L O S G A T O S S U S T A I N A B I L I T Y P L A N
I M P L E M E N T A T I O N A N D M O N I T O R I N G
A Cost Effectiveness: Low
Drafting and adopting requirements under TR -4b could carry low to moder-
ate staff -time costs. The costs of bicycle parking and facilities vary greatly
depending on the number and type of parking installations. In a relatively
secure office or building, it may be possible to provide unsecured bicycle
parking or racks at per -space costs ranging from $50 or less to greater than
$200. Secure bicycle lockers are considerably more expensive, with per -space
costs ranging from $950 to $2500.10 The total cost of installing shower facili-
ties for bicycle commuters is estimated to range from $13,000 to $30,000, de-
pending on the configuration and number of shower stalls.° Cost savings
from the installation of bicycle facilities are not readily quantifiable; however,
possible reductions in the need for car parking and potential increases in
worker health and productivity could yield indirect cost savings. If bicycle
parking and facilities were used in lieu of or as a replacement for automobile
parking, then savings would far exceed costs." Given that the anticipated
costs of this measure are high relative to its projected VMT reduction, it is
deemed to have low cost - effectiveness as a GHG reduction strategy at present.
iii. Implementation Schedule
The Town will begin implementing this measure during the 2015 -2020 phase.
TR -4c Bicycle PerkinginDowntown
Measure TR -4c directs the Town to install high - quality bicycle - parking facili-
ties Downtown in centralized, safe, and secure areas.
10 Benjamin, Matthew T., 2003. Bicycle Parking. A Plan for the Los Angeles
County Metropolitan Transportation Authority.
u Commuter Connections: How to Support Biking to work,
http: / /www. mwcog. org /commuter2 /employer /employcr_how_to_su pport_biki ng_t
o_work.htm, accessed on April 5, 2012.
" Victoria Transport Policy Institute, 2012. Transportation Cost and Benefit
Analysis l7- Parking Costs.
6 -11
TOWN OF L O S G A T O S
L O S G A T O S S U S T A I N A B I L I T Y P L A N
I M P L E M E N T A T I O N A N D M O N I T O R I N G
i. Action Items and Responsible Parties
To implement this measure, the Town will construct new bicycle - parking
facilities in the Downtown.
A Cost Effectiveness: Low
Planning and administration for the installation of new bicycle parking facili-
ties under measure TR -4a could carry low to moderate staff-time costs. The
materials and installation costs for high - quality bike parking could range from
$50 -200 per space for bike racks, to $950 -2,500 for secure bike lockers. Since
it is not anticipated that such facilities would replace car parking, measure
implementation would not offer any direct cost savings. Other indirect cost
savings could be realized through reduced congestion or increased commercial
activity generated by bicycle trips, but these are speculative and cannot readi-
ly be quantified. Civen the relatively high anticipated cost and generally low
projected VMT reduction from this measure, it is deemed to have a low cost -
effectiveness.
W. Implementation Schedule
The Town will begin implementing this measure during the 2015 -2020 phase.
TR -4d Bicycle - Sharing Program
Measure TR -4d directs the Town to encourage non - profit or volunteer organ-
izations in creating a bicycle- sharing program.
i. Action Items and Responsible Parties
To implement this measure, the Town will encourage efforts of non - profit
and volunteer organizations to create bicycle- sharing programs, such as by
providing information on the Town's website.
it Cast Effectiveness: High
Town costs from measure TR -4d are expected to be low and would stem from
the materials and staff -time needed to support and coordinate with relevant
organizations. No other costs are anticipated from this measure. Though
this measure is not likely to result in direct cost savings, the Town or resi-
dents could potentially realize long -term benefits from bicycle sharing; these
6 -12
TOWN OF LOS G A T O S
L O S G A T O S S U S T A I N A B I L I T Y P L A N
I M P L E M E N T A T I O N A N D M O N I T O R I N G
include lower transportation costs, decreased congestion, and improved air
quality. The magnitude or value of such benefits, however, will depend on
program implementation and participation levels; any estimate of these bene-
fits would be highly speculative. Though the projected VMT reduction from
this measure would be modest, the measure is anticipated to carry low costs,
present opportunities for cost savings, and would rely primarily upon work
done by volunteer or non - profit organizations. Therefore this measure is
deemed to be highly cost - effective.
iii. Implementation Schedule
The Town will begin implementing this measure during the 2012 -2015 phase.
TR -5 School Pool Program
Measure TR -5 directs the Town to implement a School Pool Program that
helps match parents to carpool students to school.
J. Action Items and Responsible Parties
To implement this measure, the Town and school districts will develop the
School Pool Program and conduct related outreach.
A Cost Effectiveness High
Costs for measure TR -5 would stem mainly from the use of Town and school
district staff time and technical resources for program implementation, and
are expected to be low. Though the Town is not expected to experience di-
rect cost savings from this measure, it could result in significant transporta-
tion- related savings for parents with school -aged children. Additionally, the
Town could experience indirect savings through reduced traffic and conges-
tion, and subsequently improved air quality. Given that this measure is likely
to result in substantial cost savings and is projected to result in significant
VMT reductions, it is deemed to be highly cost - effective.
M. Implementation Schedule
The Town will begin implementing this measure during the 2012 -2015 phase.
6 -13
TOWN OF L O S G A T O S
L O S G A T O S S U S T A I N A B I L I T Y P L A N
I M P L E M E N T A T I O N A N D M O N I T O L I N G
TR-6a Employer Commute Trip Reduction Program
Measure TR -6a directs the Town to encourage a voluntary Employer Com-
mute Trip Reduction Program.
I Action Items and Responsible Parties
To implement this measure, the Town will develop the voluntary programs
described above. New and existing non - residential development could both
participate on a voluntary basis.
ii. Cost Effectiveness: High
The drafting and adoption of an Employer Commute Trip Reduction pro-
gram under measure TR -6a could result in moderate to high staff time costs.
Programs costs would vary depending on the specific provisions of the adopt-
ed program. A 2001 study found that commuter trip reduction programs bad
an average gross cost of $156 per employee per year; however, the majority of
businesses spent less, at a range of $33 to $89 per employee per year.` ,14 Ad-
justed for inflation, the average annual per - employee cost of a trip reduction
program would be $202. Though this cost may seem high, commuter trip
reduction programs have frequently resulted in substantial overall cost savings
for both employers and workers.15 Direct cost - savings come mainly from the
reduced need for parking or parking subsidies. Additionally, telecommuting
has enabled some companies to reduce their need for office space. Indirect
savings have been realized through improved worker productivity, morale,
and health. For employees, savings arise primarily from reduced needs for
vehicle maintenance and fuel. Indirect municipal and community benefits are
realized through decreased congestion, air pollution, and infrastructure costs.
Since commuter trip reduction programs typically recoup their costs and have
a substantial potential to reduce VMT when coupled with other strategies,
measure TR -6a is deemed to be highly cost - effective.
13 Pollution Probe, 2001. North American Workplace -based Trip Reduction Pro-
grammes.
IT Costs in 2001 dollars.
15 Pollution Probe, 2001. North American Workplace -based Trip Reduction Pro-
grammes.
6 -14
TOWN OF L O S G A T O S
L O S G A T O S S U S T A I N A B I L I T Y P L A N
I M P L E M E N T A T I O N A N D M O N I T O R I N G
iii. Implementation Schedule
The Town will begin implementing this measure during the 2012 -2015 phase.
TR -6b Preferential Parking
Measure TR -6b encourages designated or preferred parking for vanpools, car-
pools, and electric vehicles in non - residential development.
1. Action Items and Responsible Parties
New non - residential development will be encouraged to incorporate designat-
ed parking into the project design. To this end, the Community Develop-
ment Department will discuss with project applicants the possibility of creat-
ing designated parking spots as part of proposed developments. The Town
will also recommend this strategy to businesses as appropriate (e.g., when
businesses seek to resurface or otherwise modify existing parking areas).
it Cost Effectiveness: High
As a voluntary measure, implementation of TR -6b would carry very low
staff time costs. Assuming that employers and businesses do not opt to create
additional parking to replace such designated spaces, additional direct costs
from implementation of this measure would be minimal, relating primarily to
signage, pavement striping, and, potentially, enforcement. These costs would
be incurred by businesses. If the provision of designated spaces leads to in-
creased vehicle pooling, cost savings could be realized through overall de-
creases in parking needs; however, precise estimates of such cost savings
would be speculative. Given that this measure carries a very low cost and
would contribute to substantial projected VMT reductions, it is deemed to be
highly cost - effective.
iii. Implementation Schedule
The Town will begin implementing this measure during the 2012 -2015 phase.
TR -6c Car - Sharing Program
Measure TR -6c directs the Town to encourage non - profit or volunteer organ-
izations in creating or providing a car - sharing program.
6 -15
TOWN OF LOS G A T O S
L O S G A T O S S U S T A I N A B I L I T Y P L A N
I M P L E M E N T A T I O N A N D M O N I T O R I N G
i. Action Items and Responsible Parties
To implement this measure, the Town will encourage the efforts of non-
profit and volunteer organizations to create car- sharing programs, such as by
providing information on the Town's website.
ii. Cost Effectiveness: High
Town costs from measure TR -6c are expected to be low and would stem from
the materials and staff -time needed to support and coordinate with relevant
organizations. No other costs are anticipated from this measure. Though
this measure is not likely to result in direct cost savings, the Town or resi-
dents could potentially realize long -term benefits from car sharing; these in-
clude lower transportation costs, decreased congestion, and improved air
quality. The magnitude or value of such benefits, however, will depend on
program implementation and participation levels; any estimate of these bene-
fits would be highly speculative. Given that this measure is anticipated to
carry low costs and is projected to contribute to substantial VMT reductions,
it is deemed to be highly cost effective.
iii. Implementation Schedule
The Town will begin implementing this measure during the 2012 -2015 phase.
TR -7 Student Transit Outreach
Measure TR -7 directs the Town to coordinate with local school districts on
marketing, promoting, and educating students about the benefits of using
public transit as a mode of travel.
J. Action Items and Responsible Parties
To implement this measure, the Town will coordinate with the school dis-
tricts to market, promote, and educate students and their families about trans-
it benefits.
ii. Cost Effectiveness: High
Costs of measure TR -7 would stem from additional staff time for coordina-
tion activities with the school district and are anticipated to be low. Addi-
tional costs would result from the development, production, and distribution
6 -16
TOWN OF LOS G A T O S
L O S G A T O S S U S T A I N A B I L I T Y P L A N
I M P L E M E N T A T I O N A N D M O N I T O R I N G
of outreach and educational materials. While no direct cost - savings are antic-
ipated, the Town would likely experience indirect benefits from reduced traf-
fic and congestion, and subsequently improved air quality. Given the low
anticipated costs of this measure and its projected significant VMT reductions,
it is deemed to be highly cost - effective.
iil. Implementation Schedule
The Town will begin implementing this measure during the 2012 -2015 phase.
TR -8a Vehicle Circulation £or Parking
Measure TR -8a directs the Town to provide better wayfinding and smart
parking strategies with attractive signage to reduce vehicle circulation related
to searching for parking spaces in the C -2 /Central Business District Zone.
I Action Items and Responsible Parties
To implement this measure, the Town will design and install signage and oth-
er strategies to reduce vehicle circulation related to searching for parking in
the Downtown.
A Cost Effectiveness: Low
Staff -time costs for measure TR -8a would depend upon whether improve-
ments under the measure are carried out by the Town itself or through a pri-
vate firm contracted to implement a comprehensive program. In 2010, work-
ing with a consultant, the city of Alexandria, Virginia (population 150,000)
initiated a comprehensive wayfinding program in its Old Town district.
Phase I of this program was projected to cost a total of approximately
$250,000. It is anticipated that the total costs of such strategies in Los Gatos
would be less, proportional to the town's lower population and smaller busi-
ness district; however, actual costs would depend on program specifics. The
Town is not expected to experience direct cost savings from the implementa-
tion of this measure, but indirect savings could be realized through decreased
congestion and air pollution, and through potential increases in business pat-
ronage. Given the relatively high anticipated costs and low projected VMT
6-17
TOWN OF LOS G A T O S
L O S G A T O S S U S T A I N A B I L I T Y P L A N
I M P L E M E N T A T I O N A N O M O N I T O R I N G
reductions resulting from this measure, it is deemed to have low cost -
effectiveness.
iii. Implementation Schedule
The Town will begin implementing this measure during the 2012 -2015 phase.
TR-8b Idling Reduction
Measure TR -8b directs the Town to encourage non - profit and volunteer or-
ganizations in conducting outreach to reduce car idling around schools during
pick -up and drop -off times.
I Action Items and Responsible Parties
To implement this measure, the Town will encourage efforts of non - profit
and volunteer organizations to reduce car idling around schools, such as by
providing information on the Town's website and other outreach.
it Cost Effectiveness: High
Town costs from measure TR -8b are expected to be low and would stem
from the materials and staff -time needed to support and coordinate with rele-
vant organizations. No other costs are anticipated from this measure.
Though this measure is not likely to result in direct cost savings, the Town or
residents could potentially realize long -term benefits from reduced car idling;
these include lower fuel spending and improved air quality. The magnitude
or value of such benefits, however, will depend on program implementation
and publicity efforts; any estimate of these benefits would be highly specula-
tive, Though the projected VMT reduction from this measure would be low,
the measure is anticipated to carry low costs, present opportunities for cost
savings, and would rely primarily upon work done by volunteer or non-
profit organizations. Therefore this measure is deemed to be highly cost -
effective.
iii. Implementation Schedule
The Town will begin implementing this measure during the 2012 -2015 phase.
6 -18
TOWN OF LOS G A T O S
L O S G A T O S S U S T A I N A B I L I T Y P L A N
I M P L E M E N T A T I O N A N D M O N I T O R I N G
b. Green Building
GB -1 Green Building Ordinance
Measure GB -1 directs the Town to develop a Green Building Ordinance that
requires energy- efficient design, 30 percent in excess of Title 24 standards to
coincide with the Voluntary Tier 2 standards of the California Green Build-
ing Code (CALGreen), for all new residential and non - residential buildings.
J . Action Items and Responsible Parties
To implement this measure, the Town will develop and adopt a Green Build-
ing Ordinance. New development will be subject to this ordinance and in-
corporate its requirements either into the project design or as mitigation in
the applicable environmental document pursuant to the CEQA. In addition,
the Community Development Department will review architectural plans for
consistency with this measure.
it Cast Effectiveness: High
Measure GB -1 is anticipated to have high staff -time costs due to the need to
draft and adopt a detailed ordinance for green building requirements. Devel-
opment costs associated with this measure stem mainly from increased mate-
rials and construction costs. It should be noted that irrespective of costs or
Town action, Title 24 standards are part of a State initiative that will establish
increasingly stringent building energy efficiency standards.
While the Pacific Gas & Electric Company (PG &E) provides detailed cost
and cost - effectiveness analyses for green building standards at 15 percent over
Title 24, such calculations are not readily available for standards at 30 percent
over Title 24. PG &E has provided such analyses for the City of San Mateo,
which is located 26 miles to the northwest of Las Gatos and in the same state
climate zone. Estimated additional building costs for compliance with stand-
ards 15 percent over Title 24 in San Mateo range from $0.50 to $1.91 per
square foot for studied residential building types, and from $1.64 to $2.75 per
square foot for studied non - residential building types. For all building types,
simple payback times ranged from 9.4 to 27.9 years. PG &E's report subse-
quently concluded that standards at 15 percent over Title 24 were cost-
6 -19
TOWN OF LOS G A T O S
L O S G A T O S S U S T A I N A B I L I T Y P L A N
I M P L E M E N T A T I O N A N D M O N I T O R I N G
effective for all studied building types. While these results do not make it
possible to extrapolate building costs for standards at 30 percent over Title 24,
they can offer a ballpark figure. It can be presumed that long -term energy
savings with standards at 30 percent over Title 24 would be even greater than
with standards at 15 percent over Title 24, though increased development
costs could lead to longer payback periods. As reported in Chapter 5, this
measure is expected to result in significant emissions reductions. Given the
anticipated long -run cost savings and significant emissions reductions, it is
deemed to be highly cost - effective.
iii. Implementation Schedule
The Town will begin implementing this measure during the 2012 -2015 phase.
GB -2 GreenPoint Rated Building Guidelines
Measure GB -2 requires that all new and significantly remodeled homes follow
the Town's adopted GreenPoint Rated Building Guidelines.
I Action Items and Responsible Parties
To implement this measure, the Town will amend the Municipal Code to
incorporate the GreenPoint requirements. New and significantly remodeled
homes will be subject to these requirements, incorporating them either into
the project design or as mitigation in the applicable environmental document
pursuant to CEQA. In addition, the Community Development Department
will review architectural plans for consistency with this measure.
ff. Cost Effectiveness: High
Measure GB -2 is anticipated to have moderate to high staff -time costs due to
the need to draft and adopt implementing ordinances for GreenPoint re-
quirements. Similar to measure GB -1 above and measure GB -1 in the munic-
ipal measures section, development costs associated with this measure will
stem from increased materials and construction costs. However, as with the
communitywide and municipal measures GB -I, measure GB -2 is likely to
result in substantial long term cost - savings from reduced energy and water
use, and potentially from improved human health. (See the cost analyses for
6 -20
TOWN OF LOS G A T O S
LOS GATOS SUSTAINABILITY PLAN
IMPLEMENTATION AND MONITORING
these measures for a quantification of similar green building costs and discus-
sion of potential cost savings.) While formal cost analyses are not available
for GreenPoint Rated Building Guidelines, it can be reasonably assumed that
the costs and cost - effectiveness of these standards will be similar to those oth-
er green building requirements. As reported in Chapter 5, this measure is
expected to result in modest emissions reductions. However, given the antic-
ipated long -run cost - savings, it is deemed to be highly cost - effective.
iii. Implementation Schedule
The Town will begin implementing this measure during the 2012 -2015 phase.
GB-3 Incentives for Green Building Certification
Measure GB -3 provides incentives for LEED Silver certification or equivalent
GreenPoint rating.
i. Action Items and Responsible Parties
To implement this measure, the Town will establish incentives for LEED
Silver certification or equivalent GreenPoint rating. As noted in Chapter 5,
this measure anticipates permitting- related incentives, such as priority in plan
review and processing. The Community Development Department will re-
view development project applications to consider whether projects meet the
incentives' certification /rating requirements, and will then follow through
with the incentives (e.g. by prioritizing the project above others that do not
meet the incentive's requirements). In order to utilize the incentives, devel-
opment project applications would demonstrate the LEED Silver certification
or equivalent GreenPoint rating.
A Cost Effectiveness High
Staff -time costs to draft and adopt incentives are anticipated to be low to
moderate. Additional costs of measure G13-3 will depend on what incentives
are developed and how they are implemented. Streamlined permitting or
other ministerial incentives may impose staff -time or other administrative
resource costs upon the Town. These costs, however, are expected to be low
and may be offset through the eventual benefits of increased green building.
6 -21
TOWN OF LOS G A T O S
L O S G A T O S S U S T A I N A B I L I T Y P L A N
I M P L E M E N T A T I O N A N D M O N I T O R I N G
Alternatively, streamlined regulations or procedures could result in reduced
staff costs over time. At present, precise estimates of the costs, benefits, and
emissions impacts of this measure would be highly speculative. However,
given the measure's anticipated low costs and likely financial returns, it is
deemed to be a highly cost - effective GHG reduction strategy.
iii. Implementation Schedule
The Town will begin implementing this measure during the 2012 -2015 phase.
GB -4 Solar Orientation
Measure GB -4 requires that development reduce energy use through solar
orientation by taking advantage of shade, prevailing winds, landscaping, and
sun screens.
i. Action Items and Responsible Parties
To implement this measure, the Town will amend the Municipal Code to
incorporate this requirement. New development will be subject to this re-
quirement, incorporating it either into the project design or as mitigation in
the applicable environmental document pursuant to CEQA. In addition, the
Community Development Department will review development project ap-
plications for consistency with this measure.
ii. Cost Effectiveness: Moderate
Measure GB -4 is anticipated to have moderate to high staff time costs due to
the need to draft and adopt implementing ordinances for solar orientation
requirements. Other development costs from this measure would stem pri-
marily from increased compliance costs during development design. Any
additional construction or materials costs would likely be minimal. All of
these costs, however, could be partially or entirely offset by resultant energy
savings, though it is not feasible to determine the absolute amount or relative
magnitude of such potential cost savings. Though there is evidence to suspect
that this measure would pose little to no long -term costs, the savings potential
and GHG benefits of this measure are highly uncertain. Therefore, this
measure is deemed to have a moderate cost - effectiveness.
6 -22
TOWN OF LOS G A T O S
L O S G A T O S S U S T A I N A B I L I T Y P L A N
I M P L E M E N T A T I O N A N D M O N I T O R I N G
iii. Implementation Schedule
The Town will begin implementing this measure during the 2012 -2015 phase.
GB -5 Removal of Barriers to Green Building
Measure GB -5 directs the Town to identify and remove regulatory or proce-
dural barriers to implementing green building practices in the town by updat-
ing codes, guidelines, and zoning.
i. Action Items and Responsible Parties
To implement this measure, the Town will review existing codes, guidelines,
and zoning to identify regulatory or procedural barriers to green building
practices. Based on the results of this review, the Town will update any
codes, guidelines, and zoning documents to remove such barriers.
it Cost Effectiveness: Moderate
Measure GB -5 is anticipated to have moderate to high staff -time costs for
analysis and streamlining of regulations and procedures. If removal of barri-
ers involves streamlined permitting, reduced fees, or other ministerial chang-
es, this measure may impose additional staff -time or other administrative re-
source costs upon the Town. These costs, however, are expected to be low
and may be offset through the eventual benefits of increased green building.
Alternatively, streamlined regulations or procedures could result in reduced
staff costs over time. At present, precise estimates of the costs, benefits, and
emissions impacts of this measure would be highly speculative. Though there
is evidence to suspect that this measure would pose little to no long -term
costs, the savings potential and CHIC benefits of this measure are highly un-
certain. Therefore, this measure is deemed to have a moderate cost -
effectiveness.
iii. Implementation Schedule
The Town will begin implementing this measure during the 2012 -2020 phase.
GB -6 Regional Green Building Programs
Measure GB -6 directs the Town to coordinate with other local governments,
special districts, nonprofits, and other public organizations to share resources,
6 -23
TOWN OF LOS G A T O S
L O S G A T O S S U S T A I N A B I L I T Y P L A N
I M P L E M E N T A T I O N A N D M O N I T O R I N G
achieve economies of scale, and develop green building policies and programs
that are optimized on a regional scale.
L Action Items and Responsible Parties
To implement this measure, the Town will coordinate, as applicable, with
other agencies for regional green building initiatives.
A Cost Effectiveness. High
Costs of measure GB -6 would stem from additional staff -time for coordina-
tion activities and could range from high to low, depending on the approach
taken. Successful achievement of regionally optimized policies and economies
of scale could offer significant cost - savings to the Town and to regional busi-
nesses who must navigate multiple public processes. However, any estimate
of cost savings or of GHG emissions reductions from this measure would be
highly speculative, and it may not be feasible to precisely quantify measure
impacts. Nevertheless, such coordination would typically be considered a
planning best practice. Despite its inherent uncertainties, the potential for
long -term efficiencies and GHG reductions make this measure a highly cost -
effective strategy.
iii. Implementation Schedule
The Town will begin implementing this measure during the 2012 -2015 phase.
c. Renewable Energy and Low Carbon Fuels
RE -I AlternativeEnerVDevelopmentPlan
Measure RE -1 directs the Town to develop an Alternative Energy Develop-
ment Plan in partnership with PG &E and local alternative energy companies.
i. Action Items and Responsible Parties
To implement this measure, the Town will coordinate with PG &E to devel-
op the Alternative Energy Development Plan. As part of this process, the
Town will identify which types of alternative energy facilities are appropriate
in Los Gatos and where, identify means to address potential land use compat-
ibility conflicts, and establish a development review process for new alterna-
tive energy projects. Town staff will also review and update existing Town
6 -24
TOWN OF LOS G A T O S
LOS GATOS SUSTAINABILITY PLAN
I M P L E M E N T A T I O N A N D M O N I T O R I N G
policies and ordinances to address alternative energy production and the find-
ings of the Alternative Energy Development Plan.
A Cost Effectiveness: Low
Costs for measure RE -1 would stem mainly from staff time and /or consultant
assistance needed to carefully draft and implement the Alternative Energy
Development Plan in cooperation with PG &E. Creation of such a plan
would likely represent a large undertaking with a long project timeline, espe-
cially given the various directives listed within this measure. After the plan is
adopted, on -going implementation and administration needs would create
long -term measure costs. On the other hand, implementation of this measure
is not anticipated to create significant costs for local residents or businesses,
and could lower costs associated with the approval of alternative energy facili-
ties. Since information regarding other similar types of plans is largely una-
vailable and since costs and savings from this measure would depend on its
particular provisions, it is not possible to provide a quantified cost estimate of
this measure. Given the measure's low GHG reduction potential reported in
Chapter 5 and relatively high costs, it is deemed to have a low cost -
effectiveness.
iii. Implementation Schedule
The Town will begin implementing this measure during the 2015 -2020 phase.
RE-2 New Solar Homes Partnership
Measure RE -2 requires that residential projects of six units or more participate
in the California Energy Commission's New Solar Homes Partnership,
which provides rebates to developers of six units or more who offer solar
power in 50 percent of new units and is a component of the California Solar
Initiative, or a similar program with solar power requirements equal to or
greater than those of the California Energy Commission's New Solar Homes
Partnership.
6 -25
TOWN OF L O S G A T O S
L O S G A T O S S U S T A I N A B I L I T Y P L A N
I M P L E M E N T A T I O N A N D M O N I T O R I N G
i. Action Items and Responsible Parties
To implement this measure, the Town will amend the Municipal Code to
incorporate this requirement. New residential projects that include six or
more units will be subject to the requirement, and will therefore need to offer
solar power in 50 percent of the new units. This could be incorporated either
into the project design or as mitigation in the applicable environmental doc-
ument pursuant to CEQA. In addition, the Community Development De-
partment will review architectural plans for consistency with this measure.
ii. Cost Effectiveness: High
Since the enabling ordinance for the requirement in measure RE -2 would be
relatively simple to draft and implement, staff -time costs are anticipated to be
low. The most significant costs would be borne by developers and by PG &E,
who would provide rebates for solar installations. (For a discussion of the
cost of photovoltaic solar systems, see the discussion for measure RE -3, be-
low.) Solar installation costs borne by developers could be passed on to resi-
dents through rents or home prices; however, it is anticipated that the energy
cost savings of solar systems would offset such costs relatively quickly, as ex-
plained for measure RE 3. Though the projected GHG reductions from this
measure are modest, as reported in Chapter 5, given its anticipated net cost
savings, this measure is deemed to be highly cost - effective.
iii. Implementation Schedule
The Town will begin implementing this measure during the 2012 -2015 phase.
RE-3 Renewable Energy Generation in Projects
Measure RE -3 requires that new or major rehabilitations of commercial, of-
fice, or industrial development greater than or equal to 20,000 square feet in
size incorporate solar or other renewable energy generation to provide 15
percent or more of the project's energy needs.
i. Action Items and Responsible Parties
To implement this measure, the Town will amend the Municipal Code to
incorporate this requirement. New or major rehabilitations of commercial,
office, or industrial development will be subject to the requirement, which
6 -26
TOWN OF LOS G A T O S
L O S G A T O S S U S T A I N A B I L I T Y P L A N
I M P L E M E N T A T I O N A N D M O N I T O R I N G
could be incorporated either into the project design or as mitigation in the
applicable environmental document pursuant to CEQA. In addition, the
Community Development Department will review architectural plans for
consistency with this measure.
A Cost Effectiveness: High
Since the enabling ordinance for the requirement in measure RE -3 would be
relatively simple to draft and implement, staff time costs are anticipated to be
low. The cost of photovoltaic solar installation in the Los Gatos area is esti-
mated to be approximately $5.75 per watt of system capacity.16 Total materi-
als and labor costs would vary by site, and by system characteristics and size.
It is also estimated that energy savings from photovoltaic systems in Los Ca-
tos allow system cost recovery after approximately five to six years of opera -
tion." Anticipated system lifetimes of 20 years or more and low maintenance
costs enhance the long -term savings from photovoltaic systems.18 Though the
projected GHG reductions from this measure are modest, as reported in
Chapter 5, given the potential long -term cost savings of photovoltaic installa-
tions, this measure is deemed highly cost - effective.
lit. Implementation Schedule
The Town will begin implementing this measure during the 2012 -2015 phase.
RE-4 Leaf Blower Ordinance
Measure RE -4 directs the Town to consider adopting an ordinance to ban the
use of two -stroke engine leaf blowers.
IG The National Renewable Energy Laboratory, The Open PV Project,
http: / /openpv.nrel.gov /, accessed on Apr 10, 2012.
19 FindSolar Solar Calculator, http : //k w .findsolar.com /index.phpo
page= rightforme, accessed on April 10, 2012.
" Barbose, Galen, et at., 2011. Report: Tracking the Sun IV. An Historical
Summary of the Installed Cart of Photovoltaics in the United States from 1998 to 2010,
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.
6 -27
TOWN OF LOS G A T O S
L O S G A T O S S U S T A I N A B 1 L I T V P L A N
I M P L E M E N T A T I O N A N D M O N I T O R I N G
i. Action Items and Responsible Parties
To implement this measure, the Town will develop and adopt an ordinance
to ban the use of two - stroke engine leaf dowers in place of electric and other
non- electric devices. Residents and businesses in Los Gatos will be subject to
this new ordinance.
fl. Cost Effectiveness: Unknown
Staff -time costs of measure RE -4 would stem from the need to draft, adopt,
and implement the enabling ordinance and guidelines, and are expected to be
moderate. Additional measure costs would include those associated with the
replacement of disallowed equipment and from potential home upgrades to
include exterior or garage electrical outlets. Electric leaf blowers currently
cost $30 -$60 per unit; the costs of potential outlet installation would vary
from home to home and it is uncertain how many homes might require such
retrofits. Given this uncertainty and a lack of information on the prevalence
of electric or gasoline leaf blowers, it is not feasible to determine a precise per
household or overall cost estimate. Given this lack of information and gen-
eral uncertainty, the cost - effectiveness of this measure cannot reasonably be
determined.
M. Implementation Schedule
The Town will begin implementing this measure during the 2012- 2015phase.
RE-5 Solar Ready Features
Measure RE -5 requires that all new buildings be constructed to allow for the
easy, cost - effective installation of future solar energy systems, where feasible.
1. Action Items and Responsible Parties
To implement this measure, the Town will amend the Municipal Code to
incorporate this requirement. New development will be subject to the re-
quirement, which could be incorporated either into the project design or as
mitigation in the applicable environmental document pursuant to CEQA. In
addition, the Community Development Department will review architectural
plans for consistency with this measure.
6 -28
TOWN OF LOS G A T O S
L O S G A T O S S U S T A I N A B I L I T Y P L A N
I M P L E M E N T A T I O N A N D M O N I T O R I N G
ii. Cost Effectiveness: Hiffb
Measure RE -5 is anticipated to have moderate to high staff -time costs due to
the need to draft and adopt implementing ordinances for "solar ready" re-
quirements. Since retrofits for existing structures would not be required,
costs from this measure would stem primarily from increased compliance
costs during development design and from increased construction costs. Var-
ying estimates are available for per -home costs of solar- readiness, ranging
from $280 —$380 to $500 41,000. These costs, however, would serve to defray
future costs if a household elects to install solar energy systems. This measure
would not in and of itself result in measurable GHG reductions, but rather
would serve to enhance the implementation and cost effectiveness of other
measures. Since this measure would serve to decrease costs and enhance the
effectiveness of other measures, it is deemed to be highly cost - effective.
iii. Implementation Schedule
The Town will begin implementing this measure during the 2012 -2015 phase.
RE -6 Solar Energy Systems at Schools
Measure RE -6 directs the Town to work with the local school districts to en-
courage the use of solar energy systems at school facilities.
I Action Items and Responsible Parties
To implement this measure, the Town will coordinate, as applicable, with
local school districts to encourage solar energy at school facilities.
A Cost Effectiveness: High
Costs of measure RE -6 would stem from staff -time costs for school district
coordination activities and are anticipated to be very low. Any estimate of
GHG emissions reductions from this measure would he highly speculative
and it is not feasible to precisely quantify measure impacts. Nevertheless,
given that this measure has very low anticipated cost, could result in cost sav-
ings to the school district (see the cost analysis for measure RE -3), and offers
potential GHG reductions, it is deemed to be highly cost - effective.
6 -29
TOWN OF L O S G A T O S
L O S G A T O S S U S T A I N A B I L I T Y P L A N
I M P L E M E N T A T I O N A N D M O N I T O R I N G
iii. Implementation Schedule
The Town will begin implementing this measure during the 2012 -2015 phase.
RE -7 Community Choice Aggregation
Measure RE -7 directs the Town to support and participate in regional efforts
to study the feasibility and interest in establishing community choice aggrega-
tion in Los Gatos.
i. Action Items and Responsible Parties
To implement this measure, the Town will participate, as applicable, in re-
gional efforts to study the feasibility of establishing community choice aggre-
gation.
It Cost Effectiveness: Unknown
Staff -time costs of measure RE -7 are expected to be low to moderate and
would stem from the need for staff to conduct research, and provide adminis-
trative and material support for efforts related to community choice aggrega-
tion. Since any sort of participation would be voluntary, this measure would
impose no direct costs on businesses or community members. This measure
is not anticipated to result in direct cost savings. In the event that Los Gatos
took part in the implementation of a community choice aggregation program,
the Town, residents, and businesses could experience either savings or addi-
tional costs, depending on subsequent changes to electricity rates. Predicting
such rate changes, however, would be speculative. It is likewise infeasible to
precisely project GHG emissions reductions that would result from this
measure. Such reductions would depend on what, if any, alterations are made
to the energy generation portfolio of Las Cams's electric provider. Since it is
not practical to precisely quantify the costs, savings, or GHG reductions re-
sulting directly from this measure, its specific cost - effectiveness cannot rea-
sonably be determined.
in. Implementation Schedule
This measure is somewhat dependent on the actions of other agencies in the
region. However, to the extent that regional efforts are underway, the Town
will begin implementing this measure during the 2012 -2015 phase.
6 -30
TOWN OF LOS G A T O S
L O S G A T O S S U S T A I N A B I L I T Y P L A N
I M P L E M E N T A T I O N A N D M O N I T O R I N G
d. Energy Conservation
EC -1 Enerhy-EfficientAppliances and Lighting
Measure EC -1 requires new development to use energy- efficient appliances
that meet ENERGY STAR standards and energy- efficient lighting technolo-
gies that exceed Title 24 standards by 30 percent.
J . Action Items and Responsible Parties
To implement this measure, the Town will amend the Municipal Code to
incorporate this requirement. New development will be subject to the re-
quirement, which could be incorporated either into the project design or as a
mitigation in the applicable environmental document pursuant to CEQA. In
addition, the Community Development Department will review develop-
ment applications for consistency with this measure.
it Cost Effectiveness: High
Staff -time costs of measure EC -1 are expected to be moderate and would stem
from the need to draft, adopt, and implement ordinances. Requirements for
ENERGY STAR appliances and fixtures are expected to potentially add an
estimated $1,280 to the base cost of outfitting a typical home with conven-
tional appliances and fixtures.19 However, over the lifetime of these items,
the total value of energy savings would be expected to more than repay addi-
tional purchase costs.20 Though the measurable projected GHG reductions
are minimal, as reported in Chapter 5, given its low costs to the Town and
overall net savings, this measure is deemed to be highly cost - effective.
Is Each house is assumed to have the following appliances, with the attendant
extra costs from ENERGY STAR compliance: AC unit, $556; washer /dryer, $258;
refrigerator, $30; dishwasher, $12; ten indoor light fixtures, $32 each; two outdoor
light fixtures, $17 each; and 25 total lightbulbs, $2.80 apiece. This results in a total
added cost of $1280 per house. All of these estimates are based on appliance cost esti-
mates provided by the ENERGY STAR program (see following footnote).
Za EnergyStar Potential Savings Calculation Spreadsheets, 2000 -2011,
http: / /www.energystar.gov/ index. cfm? c =bLill< purchasinghus_ purchasing, accessed
April 10 2012.
6 -31
TOWN OF LOS G A T O S
LOS GATOS SUSTAINABILITY PLAN
IMPLEMENTATION AND MONITORING
iii. Implementation Schedule
The Town will begin implementing this measure during the 2012 -2015 phase.
EC-2 Promotion of EnerAy Conservation
Measure EC -2 directs the Town to partner with PG &E and other appropriate
energy providers to promote energy conservation.
I Action Items and Responsible Parties
To implement this measure, the Town will coordinate with PG &E to pro-
mote various existing PG &E programs that conserve energy, as well as to
develop new PG &E programs. In addition, the Town will partner with the
Silicon Valley Association of Realtors to encourage energy audits at the time
of residential and commercial building sales.
A Cost Effectiveness: Unknown
Town costs from measure EC -2 are expected to be low and would stem pri-
marily from material and staff -time costs to create promotional materials and
conduct public outreach. Other costs from this measure could include mate-
rials costs for light -bulb giveaways or torchiere exchange programs, which is
anticipated to be funded through PG &E's incentive programs. Estimating
such costs at present, however, would be speculative. The promotion of EN-
ERGY STAR appliances for existing residential units, however, does have
quantifiable costs and benefits (see footnote for measure EC -1). Given EN-
ERGY STAR's anticipated energy cost savings and projected GHG reduc-
tions, this particular provision of measure EC -2 would be highly cost -
effective. Nevertheless, for most of the provisions under this measure, it is
not readily possible to quantify costs or GHG reductions. Therefore the
measure's overall cost - effectiveness cannot reasonably be determined.
iii. Implementation Schedule
The Town will begin implementing this measure during the 2012 -2015 phase.
EC -3 Energy - Efficient Outdoor Lighting
Measure EC -3 requires that outdoor lighting fixtures be energy - efficient.
6 -32
TOWN OF L O S G A T O S
L O S G A T O S S U S T A I N A B I L I T Y P L A N
I M P L E M E N T A T I O N A N D M O N I T O R I N G
i. Action Items and Responsible Parties
To implement this measure, the Town will amend the Municipal Code to
incorporate the lighting efficiency requirements. New development will be
subject to the requirements, which could be incorporated either into the pro-
ject design or as mitigation in the applicable environmental document pursu-
ant to CEQA. In addition, the Community Development and Parks and
Public Works Departments will review lighting plans for consistency with
this measure.
A Cost Effectiveness: High
Staff time costs of measure EC -3 are expected to be moderate and would stem
from the need to draft, adopt, and implement ordinances. Energy- efficient
lighting often uses light- emitting diode (LED) technology, and costs for LED
technology continue to fall precipitously; LED streetlights are now available
at $200 per unit and life -cycle costs are now less than those of conventional
lighting technology.z12z Despite offering low projected GHG reductions, as
reported in Chapter 5, given its anticipated net cost savings, this measure is
deemed to be highly cost- effective.
iii. Implementation Schedule
The Town will begin implementing this measure during the 2012 -2015 phase.
EC-4 Kill -A- Watt Electricity Usage Monitor program
Measure ECA directs the Town to continue the Kill -A -Watt Electricity Usage
Monitor program, through which residents can check out a device from the
library that can he plugged into household electronics to see how much elec-
tricity they require.
a Science Daily, March 8 2010, LED Streettights Best BtT for Cities, Researchers
Report, http: //w w.sciencedaily.com/ releases /2010/03/100308132136.hLm, accessed
April 19, 2012.
ez Linbaugh, Kate, April 9 2012, LED Streetlight's Price Cut in Hall; Wall Street
Journal.
6 -33
TOWN OF L O S G A T O S
LOS GATOS SUSTAINABILITV PLAN
I M P L E M E N T A T I O N A N D M O N I T O R I N G
i. Action Items and Responsible Parties
To implement this measure, the Town will ensure long -term continuation of
the existing Kill -A -Watt electricity Usage Monitor program.
ii. Cost Effectiveness: Unknown
Town costs from measure ECA are expected to be low and would stem from
the cost of new or replacement meters, and from staff -time costs to administer
the on -going program. It is anticipated that there would be no other costs
from this measure. While this measure has very low costs, it is not possible to
quantify resulting GHG emissions reduction. Therefore this measure's cost -
effectiveness cannot reasonably be determined.
iii. Implementation Schedule
The Town will begin implementing this measure during the 2012 -2015 phase.
EC -5 Law - Income Weatherization
Measure EC -5 directs the Town to seek funding to implement a low- income
weatherization program.
I Action Items and Responsible Parties
To implement this measure, the Town will investigate funding opportunities
for weatherization of properties owned by low - income residents.
ii. Cost Effectiveness High
Town costs from measure EC -5 are expected to be low and would stem from
staff -time costs to seek relevant funding. Assuming the Town identifies and
obtains full weatherization program funding, it is anticipated that staff -time
would be the only source of net costs for the Town from this measure. While
this measure has very low anticipated costs, it is not possible to quantify re-
sulting GHG emissions reduction. Therefore the measure's cost effectiveness
cannot reasonably be determined. It should be noted, however, that federally
administered weatherization programs typically apply treatments which pro-
6 -34
TOWN OF LOS G A T O S
L O S G A T O S S U S T A I N A B I L I T Y P L A N
I M P L E M E N T A T I O N A N D M O N I T O R I N G
vide savings commensurate with their costs.23 If any local weatherization
program pursuant to this measure were to follow similar guidelines, such a
program could in itself be highly cost - effective.
ii1. Implementation Schedule
The Town will begin implementing this measure during the 2012 -2015 phase.
EC -6 Quality Insulation Installation
Measure EC -6 directs the Town to provide links to and /or contact infor-
mation on the Town's website for education and outreach by outside organi-
zations that promote quality insulation installation (QII), which eliminates
gaps in buildings.
J . Action Items and Responsible Parties
To implement this measure, the Town will provide links and /or contact in-
formation on the Town's website as directed above.
ii. Cost Effectiveness: Unknown
Town costs from measure EC -6 are expected to be very low and would stem
from staff time costs to update the website. It is anticipated that there would
be no other costs from this measure. While this measure has very low antici-
pated costs, it is not possible to quantify the resulting GHG emissions reduc-
tion, in part because the measure contains no requirements or regulations.
Therefore, the measure's cost effectiveness cannot reasonably be determined.
It should be noted, however, that energy savings from improved insulation
could render such installations highly cost - effective in and of themselves.
lit. Implementation Schedule
The Town will begin implementing this measure during the 2012 -2015 phase.
23 Oak Ridge National Laboratory, National Retrospective Evaluation of the
Weatherization Assistance Program (WAP), http: / /weatherization.oml.gov/
evaluation_nr.shtml, accessed on Apr 25, 2012.
6 -35
TOWN OF LOS G A T O S
L O S G A T O S S U S T A I N A B I L I T Y P L A N
I M P L E M E N T A T I O N A N D M O N I T O R I N G
EC -7 Energy Audit Funding Sources
Measure EC -7 directs the Town to compile a list of funding sources that local
residents, businesses, or the Town could potentially access to fund energy
audits to inform homeowners and businesses of opportunities to improve the
energy efficiency of their homes and buildings.
i. Action Items and Responsible Parties
To implement this measure, the Town will research and compile a list of po-
tential funding sources for energy audits and energy efficiency upgrades for
homes and businesses. The Town will also conduct outreach to make this
information available to homes and businesses.
ii. Cost Effectiveness: Unknown
Town costs from measure EC -7 are expected to be low and would stem from
staff -time costs to compile relevant information and distribute it to home-
owners and businesses. It is anticipated that there would be no other costs
from this measure. While this measure has very low anticipated costs, it is
not possible to quantify resulting GHG emissions reductions. Therefore the
measure's cost effectiveness cannot reasonably be determined.
It Implementation Schedule
The Town will begin implementing this measure during the 2012 -2015 phase.
EC -8 CaliformaFIRSTProgram
Measure EC -8 directs the Town to continue participation in the Californi-
aFIRST program, which provides innovative, low interest financing for ener-
gy efficiency projects for existing and new development.
I Action Items and Responsible Parties
To implement this measure, the Town will continue to participate in the Cal -
iforniaFIRST program.
It Cost Effectiveness: Unknown
Town costs from measure EC -8 are expected to be low and would stem from
staff -time costs to administer the on -going program. It is anticipated that
6 -36
TOWN OF LOS G A T O S
L O S G A T O S S U S T A I N A B I L I T Y P L A N
I M P L E M E N T A T I O N A N D M O N I T O R I N G
there would be no other costs from this measure. While this measure has
very low anticipated costs, the GHG emissions reductions are unknown.
Therefore the measure's cost effectiveness cannot reasonably be determined.
It should be noted, however, that other jurisdictions have deemed participa-
tion in CaliforniaFirst to be a locally cost - effective means of promoting ener-
gy savings. 24
iii. Implementation Schedule
The Town will begin implementing this measure during the 2012 -2015 phase.
EC -9 Heat Island Mitigation Plan
Measure EC -9 directs the Town to develop a "heat island" mitigation plan
that requires cool roofs, cool pavements, and strategically placed shade trees.
I . Action Items and Responsible Parties
To implement this measure, the Town will develop the heat island mitigation
plan, and amend the Municipal Code and Design Guidelines to integrate the
heat island mitigation requirements. New development will be subject to the
heat island requirements, which could be incorporated either into the project
design or as mitigation in the applicable environmental document pursuant to
CEQA. In addition, the Community Development Department will review
development applications for consistency with this measure.
A CostEffectiveness: High
Measure EC -9 would be expected result in high staff -time costs for the devel-
opment and adoption of the heat island mitigation plan as well as enabling
ordinances for plan requirements. Costs for residents and businesses would
stem from the materials, installation, and maintenance costs for cool roofs
and pavements, as well as trees. The Environmental Energy Technologies
Division at the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory has estimated that
cool roofing cost premiums range from no additional cost to an additional
$0.20 per square foot, depending on the slope and size of the roof area, as well
24 County of San Diego, December 8 2009, Board of Supervisors Agenda
Item 30.
6 -37
TOWN OF LOS G A T O S
L O S G A T O S S U S T A I N A B I L I T Y P L A N
IMPLEMENTATION AND MONITORING
as the type of cool roof installed. However, this group has also estimated that
cost savings from cool roofs range from $0.16 to $0.77 per square foot and
that cool roofs would be cost effective in the vast majority of California's
climate zones, including that of Los Gatos.25 Cool roofing offers these cost
savings through reductions in both building heat gain and urban heat island
effects, thereby decreasing energy use; additional cost savings can be realized
through longer roof lifetimes due to reduced heat - stress on materials.
In its cool pavement documentation, the US Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) notes that it is difficult to make cost comparisons between
conventional and cool pavement options, but does provide estimated cost
ranges. Inexpensive cool pavement options such as asphalt using light - colored
aggregates can cost as little as $0.10 to $1.50 per square foot, while more du-
rable or aesthetically pleasing options such as vegetated or un- vegetated pav-
ing blocks may cost anywhere from $1.50 to $10.00 per square foot. Other
surfacing options such as microsurfacing or ultra -thin white- topping can cost
anywhere between $0.35 and $6.50 per square foot. Despite these variations
in its cost estimates, the EPA stresses that benefits of such pavement systems
include lowered heat gain, decreased stormwater runoff and pollution, and in
some cases longer pavement lifetimes; the long -term savings from these bene-
fits can often outweigh the added costs of nonconventional paving systems. 26
Additionally, recent studies have indicated that higher reflectivity pavements
could significantly offset global warming. 27
2s Levinson, Ronnen, et at., December 2002, Inclusion of Cool Roofs in Nonresi-
dential Title 24 Prescriptive Requirements, Heat Island Group - Environmental Energy
Technologies Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA.
* US EPA, Reducing Urban Heat Islands. Compendium of Strategies Cool Pave-
ments.
u Akbari. Hashem, et al., 2012, The Long Term Effect of Increasing the Albedo of
Urban Areas, Environmental Research Letters.
6 -38
TOWN OF LOS G A T O S
LOS GATOS SUSTAINABILITY PLAN
I M P L E M E N T A T I O N A N D M O N I T O R I N G
In regard to trees, studies have found that every dollar invested in urban trees
can result in returns of $1.37 to $3.09.28 Additionally, urban tree planting has
been found to reduce GHG emissions through cooling and shading effects.29
While this measure is not predicted to reduce GHG emissions beyond the
reductions anticipated by Title 24 standards, . its benefits could potentially be
substantial. Although the local costs and savings of a comprehensive heat -
island mitigation plan cannot be precisely estimated, the available evidence
strongly indicates substantive long -term cost savings from these programs.
Therefore, given its strong potential for cost savings and other benefits, this
measure is deemed to be highly cost - effective.
iii. Implementation Schedule
The Town will begin implementing this measure during the 2012 -2015 phase.
EC-10 Heat Gain Reduction
Measure EC -10 requires all new development and major rehabilitation pro-
jects to incorporate strategies to reduce heat gain for 50 percent of the non -
roof impervious site landscape.
J . Action Items and Responsible Parties
To implement this measure, the Town will amend the Municipal Code to
incorporate this requirement. New development and major rehabilitation
projects will be subject to the requirement, which could be incorporated ei-
ther into the project design or as mitigation in the applicable environmental
document pursuant to CEQA. In addition, the Community Development
Department will review development applications for consistency with this
measure.
28 McPherson, Greg, et al., 2005. Municipal Forest Benefits and Costs.
29 McPherson, Greg, 2007. Urban Tree Planting and Greenhouse Gas Reduc-
Lions, Arborist News.
6 -39
TOWN OF LOS G A T O S
L O S G A T O S S U S T A I N A B I L I T Y P L A N
I M P L E M E N T A T I O N A N D M O N I T O R I N G
ii. Cost Effectiveness: Unknown
The requirements of measure EC -10 would already be met through compli-
ance with Title 24; therefore, measure EC -10 would itself impose no addition-
al costs. The GHG reductions resulting from measure EC -10 are accounted
for in estimated reductions from State Title 24 standards. Since neither its
costs nor GHG reductions are individually estimated, this measure's individ-
ual cost effectiveness cannot reasonably be determined.
iii. Implementation Schedule
The Town will begin implementing this measure during the 2012 -2015 phase.
EC -11 Programmable Thermostats
Measure EC -11 directs the Town to encourage the installation of program-
mable thermostats in existing residential and commercial buildings.
I Action Items and Responsible Parties
To implement this measure, the Town will conduct outreach to encourage
the installation of programmable thermostats in existing buildings. In addi-
tion, to comply with Title 24 requirements, the Town will require replace-
ment of thermostats when approving permits requiring heating /cooling sys-
tem renovation.
ii. Cost Effectiveness: High
Staff time costs for measure EC -11 are expected to be low and would stem
from promotional materials, public education efforts, or Town guidelines to
promote installation of programmable thermostats. Since installation would
be voluntary, no additional costs would be imposed. Programmable thermo-
stats cost approximately $100 with installation costs generally between $50
and $100. Residents who choose to install programmable thermostats could,
however, experience energy savings of about 10 percent per year.30 Tools
available from the federal ENERGY STAR program estimate that for areas of
`U.S. Department of Energy, Energy Savers webpage, http: / /www.energy
savem.gov /your home/ space_ heating _cooling /index.cfm /mytopic= 12720, accessed
on April 26 2012.
6 -40
TOWN OF LOS G A T O S
L O S G A T O S S U S T A I N A B I L I T Y PLAN
I M P L E M E N T A T I O N A N D M O N I T O R I N G
central California, yearly savings could total $55.31 Since this measure is vol-
untary, it is not feasible to precisely quantify resultant GHG emissions reduc-
tions. Though individual emissions reductions for the measure cannot be
quantified, this measure has the potential to result in net cost savings. There-
fore, this measure is therefore deemed to be highly cost - effective.
iii. Implementation Schedule
The Town will begin implementing this measure during the 2012 -2015 phase.
EC 12 Energy Conservation through Design Outreach
Measure EC -12 directs the Town to form a volunteer committee of local de-
sign professionals to create a brochure to educate citizens on how to save en-
ergy through design.
i. Action Items and Responsible Parties
To implement this measure, the Town will spearhead the creation of a volun-
teer committee to create the brochure.
ii. Cost Effectiveness Unknown
Town costs from measure EC -12 are expected to be low and would stem from
staff -time costs to convene and facilitate the resultant committee, as well as
printing costs for the brochure. It is anticipated that there would be no other
costs from this measure. The measure has very low costs, but it is not possi-
ble to quantify resulting GHG emissions reductions. Therefore the measure's
cost effectiveness cannot reasonably be determined.
iii. Implementation Schedule
The Town will begin implementing this measure during the 2012 -2015 phase.
31 ENERGY STAR Potential Savings Calculation Spreadsheets, 2009 -2011,
http: //w .encrgystar.gov/ index. cf m? c= bulk_purchasing.bus— purchasing, accessed
April 10 2012.
6 -41
TOWN OF L O S G A T O S
L O S G A T O S S U S T A I N A B I L I T Y P L A N
I M P L E M E N T A T I O N A N D M O N I T O R I N G
e. Water and Wastewater
WWI Water Use and Efficiency Requirements
Measure WW -1 requires all water use and efficiency measures identified as
voluntary in the California Green Building Standards Code for all new devel-
opment.
I Action Items and Responsible Parties
To implement this measure, the Town will amend the Municipal Code to
incorporate these requirements. New development will be subject to these
requirements, incorporating them either into the project design or as mitiga-
tion in the applicable environmental document pursuant to CEQA. In addi-
tion, the Community Development Department will review development
project applications for consistency with this measure.
A Cost Effectiveness: Unknown
Staff -time costs of measure WW -1 are expected to be moderate to high and
would stem from the need to draft, adopt, and implement enabling ordinanc-
es. Costs to developers or homeowners will vary depending on what steps are
taken to meet these requirements. These requirements also overlap consider-
ably with the provisions of statewide water conservation initiatives, compli-
cating any quantification of direct measure costs. As reported in Chapter 5,
the GHG reductions from measure WW -1 are measurable, but quite modest;
its direct costs cannot be precisely quantified; and its provisions overlap con-
siderably with State requirements. Given these uncertainties, the cost -
effectiveness of measure WW -1 cannot reasonably be determined. It should
be noted however, that the content of this measure may be viewed as an im-
portant component of a broader strategy for water -use reduction.
iii. Implementation Schedule
The Town will begin implementing this measure during the 2012 -2020 phase.
WW-2a Water Efficiency Retrofits Ordinance
Measure WW -2a directs the Town to adopt a water efficiency retrofit ordi-
nance that requires upgrades as a condition of issuing permits for renovations
6 -42
TOWN OF LOS G A T O S
L O S G A T O S S U S T A I N A B I L I T Y P L A N
I M P L E M E N T A T I O N A N D M O N I T O R I N G
or additions, and to work with local water purveyors to achieve consistent
standards and review and approval procedures for implementation.
J . Action Items and Responsible Parties
To implement this measure, the Town will develop and adopt a water effi-
ciency retrofit ordinance. Applicants for permits for renovations or additions
will be subject to this ordinance and incorporate its requirements either into
the project design or as mitigation in the applicable environmental document
pursuant to CEQA. In addition, the Community Development Department
will review permit applications for consistency with this measure.
ii. Cost Effectiveness. Unknown
Staff time costs of measure WW -2a are expected to be moderate to high and
would stem from the need to coordinate with water purveyors, and draft,
adopt, and implement enabling ordinances. Costs and savings for homeown-
ers and businesses will vary depending on what requirements are established
and what steps are taken to meet them. These requirements also overlap con-
siderably with the provisions of statewide water conservation initiatives,
complicating any quantification of direct measure costs or benefits. Although
this measure contributes to modest GHG reductions, as reported in Chapter
5, its direct costs cannot be precisely quantified. Given these uncertainties,
the cost - effectiveness of measure WW-2a cannot reasonably be determined. It
should be noted, however, that the content of this measure may be viewed as
an important component of a broader strategy for water -use reduction.
iii. Implementation Schedule
The Town will begin implementing this measure during the 2015 -2020 phase.
WW-2b Water Conservation Pricing
Measure WW -2b directs the Town to work with the San Jose Water Compa-
ny (SJWC) and Santa Clara Valley Water District (SCVWD) to adopt water
conservation pricing.
6 -43
TOWN OF LOS G A T O S
L O S G A T O S S U S T A I N A B I L I T Y P L A N
I M P L E M E N T A T I O N A N D M O N I T O R I N G
i. Action Items and Responsible Parties
To implement this measure, the Town will coordinate with SJWC and
SCVWD to encourage them to adopt water pricing that promotes conserva-
tion.
A CostEf£ecLiveness: Unknown
Staff -time costs of measure WW -2b are expected to be moderate and would
stem from the need to coordinate with water purveyors to achieve conserva-
tion pricing goals. Costs and savings for homeowners will vary depending on
what rate structures or other conservation methods are adopted, and what
actions individual homeowners take. The effects of this measure also overlap
considerably with those of statewide water conservation initiatives, compli-
cating the quantification of direct costs or benefits. Although this measure
contributes to modest GHG reductions, as reported in Chapter 5, its direct
costs cannot be precisely quantified. Given these uncertainties, the cost -
effectiveness of measure WW-2b cannot reasonably be determined. It should
be noted, however, that the content of this measure may be viewed as an im-
portant component of a broader strategy for water -use reduction.
iii. Implementation Schedule
The Town will begin implementing this measure during the 2012 -2015 phase.
WW-3 Bay Friendly Landscaping
Measure WW -3 requires new development to use native plants or other ap-
propriate non - invasive plants that are drought - tolerant.
i. Action Items and Responsible Parties
To implement this measure, the Town will amend the Municipal Code to
incorporate this requirement. New development will be subject to the re-
quirement, which could be incorporated either into the project design or as
mitigation in the applicable environmental document pursuant to CEQA. In
addition, the Community Development Department will review landscape
plans for consistency with this measure.
6 -44
TOWN OF L O S G A T O S
L O S G A T O S S U S T A I N A B I L I T Y P L A N
I M P L E M E N T A T I O N A N D M O N I T O R I N G
ii. Cost Effectiveness High
Staff -time costs of measure WW -3 are expected to be moderate and would
stem from the need to draft, adopt, and implement ordinances. Other costs
from this measure would stem from the additional expense of selecting and
planting appropriate plants. Costs for water efficient landscaping vary, with
multiple estimates, including $3.50 to $10 per square foot, $1.37 to $1.93 per
square foot, and $1,500 to $15,000 for an entire project.'t'a" Installation
costs could be lower, however, for yards which substitute in native plants,
but are otherwise conventional. Maintenance costs of xeriscaping vary and
may be either higher or lower than those of conventional lawns. Studies of
xeriscaping have indicated that simple payback times for conversion projects
range from two to six years.35 Since this measure would only apply to new
developments, costs would be lower than for retrofits, potentially improving
payback times. However, since overall water savings from implementation of
this measure cannot be reliably predicted, GHG emissions reductions from
this measure cannot be precisely quantified. Nevertheless, since installation
of low -water and drought- tolerant landscaping would lead to net cost savings,
this measure is deemed to be highly cost - effective.
ill. Implementation Schedule
The Town will begin implementing this measure during the 2012 -2015 phase.
WW-4 WaterEfficlent Landscape Ordinance Update
Measure WW -4 directs the Town to review and update the Town's Water
Efficient Landscape Ordinance with improved conservation programs and
32 Wardell, Sean, February 6 2012. Xeriscape business blooming Killeen Daily
Herald.
"Caldwell, Elizabeth, July 17 2007. With Xeriscaping Grass Needn't Always Be
Greener, USAToday.
3" Southern Nevada Water Authority, 2005. Xeriscape Conversion Study Final
Report.
31 Southern Nevada Water Authority, 2005. Xeriscape Conversion Study Final
Report.
6 -45
TOWN OF L O S G A T O S
L O S G A T O S S U S T A I N A B I L I T Y P L A N
I M P L E M E N T A T I O N A N D M O N I T O R I N G
incentives for non - residential customers that are consistent with the Tier 1
water conservation standards of Title 24.
i. Action Items and Responsible Parties
To implement this measure, the Town will periodically review the existing
Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance, and update it to include improved con-
servation programs and incentives to maintain consistency with State man-
dates. New development will be subject to the updated landscape require-
ments and incentives.
fl. Cost Effectiveness: Unknown
Staff -time costs of measure WW-4 are expected to be low to moderate and
would stem from the need to draft, adopt, and implement ordinance updates.
Other costs from this measure will depend on what programs and incentives
are developed and how they are implemented. (See cost analysis of WW-3 for
discussion of costs and savings of water efficient landscapes.) While overall
costs of this measure are anticipated to be low, it would not reduce GHG
emissions beyond State requirements. Given the uncertainty regarding both
measure costs and resulting GHG reductions, the cost effectiveness of this
measure cannot reasonably be determined. It should be noted however, that
the content of this measure may be viewed as a potentially necessary individ-
ual component of a broader strategy for water use reduction.
iii. Implementation Schedule
The Town will begin implementing this measure during the 2012 -2015 phase.
WW5 Water Audit Programs
Measure WW-5 directs the Town customers to promote water audit programs
that offer free water audits to single - family, multi - family, large landscape ac-
counts, and commercial customers, in collaboration with efforts by SJWC
and SCVWD. It also directs the Town to collaborate with purveyors to enact
conservation programs and create programs to install ultra -low -flush toilets in
facilities.
6 -46
TOWN OF L O S G A T O S
L O S G A T O S S U S T A I N A B I L I T Y P L A N
I M P L E M E N T A T I O N A N D M O N I T O R I N G
i. Action Items and Responsible Parties
To implement this measure, the Town will conduct outreach to promote
water audit and other programs of SJWC and SCVWD. The Town will also
collaborate with these agencies to create new water conservation programs.
ii. Cost Effectiveness: Unknown
Staff -time costs of measure WW -5 are expected to be low to moderate and
would .stem from material and staff -time costs to promote water audit pro-
grams and work with water purveyors. Costs and savings for homeowners
and businesses will vary depending on the results of individual audits and
what actions are subsequently taken. The effects of this measure also overlap
considerably with those of statewide water conservation initiatives, compli-
cating any quantification of direct costs or benefits. GHG emissions reduc-
tions from this measure have already been accounted for by measure WW -2.
Since it is not practical to quantify the costs, benefits, or GHG reductions
resulting directly from this measure, its specific cost - effectiveness cannot rea-
sonably be determined. It should be noted, however, that the content of this
measure may be viewed as an important component of a broader strategy for
water use reduction.
iii. Implementation Schedule
The Town will begin implementing this measure during the 2012 -2015 phase.
WW-6 Rainwater Collection Policy
Measure WW -6 directs the Town to encourage residential rainwater collec-
tion and consider updating the Zoning Code or other code amendments as
needed to encourage and support permitting and regulation of residential
rainwater systems.
J . Action Items and Responsible Parties
To implement this measure, the Town will develop the rainwater collection
policy and consider amending the Municipal Code to incorporate it. If
adopted, existing and new residential development may develop a rainwater
collection system through this new permit procedure.
6 -47
TOWN OF L O S G A T O S
L O S G A T O S S U S T A I N A B I L I T Y P L A N
I M P L E M E N T A T I O N A N D M O N I T O U N G
ii. Cost Effectiveness: Un1O7own
Staff time costs of measure WW-6 are expected to be moderate and would
stem from the need to draft, adopt, and implement enabling ordinances and
zoning code updates. Costs and savings for home and business owners would
depend on program participation and Town requirements. Any effects of this
measure would overlap considerably with those of statewide water conserva-
tion initiatives, complicating any quantification of direct costs or benefits.
Since it is not practical to quantify the costs, benefits, or GHG reductions
resulting directly from this measure, its specific cost - effectiveness cannot rea-
sonably be determined. It should be noted, however, that the content of this
measure may be viewed as an important component of a broader strategy for
water -use reduction.
iii. Implementation Schedule
The Town will begin implementing this measure during the 2015 -2020 phase.
I. Solid Waste
As reported in Chapter 5, the solid waste measures included in this section
will support the Town's waste reduction and diversion programs that are re-
quired by State law, but will not further reduce GHG emissions from solid
waste generated in Los Gatos beyond what was estimated in the adjusted fore-
cast. Since these measures will not reduce GHG emissions beyond what is
already required by State law, it is generally not practical to provide estimates
of cost - effectiveness for those measures. Some solid waste measures, however,
present clear -cut cost saving opportunities, and it is possible to automatically
classify such measures as highly cost - effective, irrespective of resulting GHG
reductions. All solid waste measures with cost savings potential and therefore
high cost - effectiveness are analyzed below. For all other solid waste measures,
the cost - effectiveness cannot reasonably be determined; however, the content
of these measures may be viewed as an important component of a broader
strategy for waste reduction.
MUM
TOWN OF LOS G A T O S
L O S G A T O S S U S T A I N A B I L I T Y P L A N
I M P L E M E N T A T I O N A N D M O N I T O R I N G
SW -1 Construction Waste Diversion
Measure SW -1 directs the Town to revise the existing construction and demo-
lition ordinance to require at least 50 percent diversion of non - hazardous con-
struction waste from disposal.
1. Action Items and Responsible parties
To implement this measure, the Town will revise the existing construction
and demolition ordinance to include this requirement. Construction and
demolition activities in Los Gatos will be subject to this requirement, and
Town staff will review construction and demolition permit applications to
ensure compliance with this measure.
it Cost Effectiveness: High
Staff -time costs of measure SW -1 are expected to be moderate and would stem
from the need to draft, adopt, and implement enabling ordinances for the
measure's requirements. Construction costs or savings from this measure
would depend, in large part, upon the specific circumstances and characteris-
tics of any particular project. Despite this variability, CalRecycle offers gen-
eralized estimates for the cost of recycling various construction materials.
Additionally, Build It Green estimates that recycling or reuse of demolition
and construction wastes can save between $0.10 and $1.00 per square foot"
Because measure SW -1 is anticipated to result in net savings in itself, it is
deemed to be highly cost - effective.
iii. Implementation Schedule
The Town will begin implementing this measure during the 2012 -2015 phase.
SW2 RecyclingAreasinMulti- Family Developments
Measure SW -2 requires all new and significant redevelopments and remodels
of existing multi family developments to provide recycling areas for their
residents within existing trash areas.
"Built It Green, 2006. Construction &Demolition Waste Diversion,
http: / /www.builditgreen.org/ attachments /wysiwyg /3 /CD- Waste - Diversion.pdf,
accessed Apr 12, 2012.
6 -49
TOWN OF L O S G A T O S
L O S G A T O S S U S T A I N A B I L I T Y P L A N
I M P L E M E N T A T I O N A N D M O N I T O R I N G
i. Action Items and Responsible Parties
To implement this measure, the Town will amend the Municipal Code to
incorporate this requirement. New and significant redevelopments will be
subject to the requirement, which could be incorporated either into the pro-
ject design or as mitigation in the applicable environmental document pursu-
ant to CEQA. In addition, the Community Development Department will
review development applications for consistency with this measure.
A Cost Effectiveness: High
Staff -time costs of measure SW -2 are expected to be moderate and would stem
from the need to draft, adopt, and implement enabling ordinances for the
measure's requirements. Other costs for this measure could arise from the
need for increased space, management, or number of receptacles to accom-
modate recycling. These costs, however, are anticipated to be very low rela-
tive to overall construction or remodeling costs. Because this measure is an-
ticipated to result in very low costs and would support the Town's waste di-
version goals, it is deemed to be highly cost - effective.
in. Implementation Schedule
The Town will begin implementing this measure during the 2012 -2015 phase.
SW-3 Salvaged, Recycled - Content, and Local Construction Materials
Measure SW -3 encourages the use of salvaged and recycled - content materials
and other materials that have low production energy costs for building mate-
rials, hard surfaces, and non -plant landscaping, and requires sourcing of con-
struction materials locally, as feasible.
i. Action Items and Responsible Parties
To implement this measure, the Town will develop informational materials
and outreach to encourage the use of salvaged and recycled materials, and will
amend the Municipal Code to require the sourcing of construction materials
locally as feasible. Construction projects will be subject to the requirement,
which could be incorporated either into the project design or as mitigation in
the applicable environmental document pursuant to CEQA. In addition, the
NI ME
TOWN OF LOS G A T O S
L O S G A T O S S U S T A I N A B I L I T Y P L A N
I M P L E M E N T A T I O N A N D M O N I T O R I N G
Community Development Department will review development applications
for consistency with this measure.
it Implementation Schedule
The Town will begin implementing this measure during the 2015 -2020 phase.
SW-4 Food and Green Waste
Measure SW -4 directs the Town to work with public and private waste dis-
posal entities to keep food and green waste out of landfills.
J . Action Items and Responsible Parties
To implement this measure, the Town will coordinate with its waste disposal
company to encourage acceptance of food and green waste for curbside pick-
up.
ii. Implementation Schedule
The Town will begin implementing this measure during the 2015 -2020 phase.
SW-5 Recycling and Compostinglncentives
Measure SW -5 directs the Town to work with public and private waste dis-
posal entities to incentivize recycling and composting.
L Action Items and Responsible Parties
To implement this measure, the Town will coordinate with its waste disposal
company to develop incentive programs for recycling and composting.
It Implementation Schedule
The Town will begin implementing this measure during the 2015 -2020 phase.
SW -6 Downtown Recycling Containers
Measure SW -6 directs the Town to continue to provide recycling containers
in the Downtown area.
6 -51
TOWN OF LOS G A T O S
L O S G A T O S S U S T A I N A B I L I T Y P L A N
I M P L E M E N T A T I O N A N D M O N I T O R I N G
J . Action Items and Responsible Parties
To implement this measure, the Town will replace recycling containers in the
Downtown, as needed, and install new containers as appropriate.
ii. Implementation Schedule
The Town will begin implementing this measure during the 2012 -2015 phase.
SW-7 Waste Reduction Outreach
Measure SW -7 directs the Town to expand educational programs to inform
residents about reuse, recycling, composting, waste to energy, and zero waste
programs.
I . Action Items and Responsible Parties
To implement this measure, the Town will expand educational and outreach
programs about waste reduction.
ii. Implementation Schedule
The Town will begin implementing this measure during the 2015 -2020 phase.
SW-8 Plastic Bag Ordinance
Measure SW -8 directs the Town to adopt an ordinance to ban the use of plas-
tic bags in Los Gatos.
i. Action Items and Responsible Parties
To implement this measure, the Town will develop and adopt an ordinance
to ban the use of plastic bags in Los Gatos. Retail stores will be subject to this
ordinance, and the Community Development Department will review use
permit applications to ensure compliance with this measure.
It Implementation Schedule
The Town will begin implementing this measure during the 2015 -2020 phase.
SW -9 Purchasing of Recycled Materials
Measure SW -9 directs the Town to develop policies, incentives, and design
guidelines that encourage the public and private purchase and use of durable
[10%
TOWN OF LOS G A T O S
L O S G A T O S S U S T A I N A B I L I T Y P L A N
I M P L E M E N T A T I O N A N D M O N I T O R I N G
and nondurable items, including building materials, made from recycled ma-
terials or renewable resources.
J . Action Items and Responsible Parties
To implement this measure, the Town will develop policies, incentives, and
guidelines to encourage the purchase of items made from recycled or renewa-
ble resources.
11. Implementation Schedule
The Town will begin implementing this measure during the 2015 -2020 phase.
SW-10 Additional Waste Diversion
Measure SW 10 directs the Town to aim to achieve the 75 percent waste di-
version goal established by AB 341.
I Action Items and Responsible Partles
To implement this measure, the Town will develop policies and incentives to
encourage the additional waste diversion.
ii. Implementation Schedule
The Town will begin implementing this measure during the 2015 -2020 phase.
g. Open Space
As noted in Chapter 5, the open space measures would not result in measure -
able reductions in GHG emissions in Los Gatos. Since projected GHG emis-
sions reductions from individual open space measures are not available, it is
generally not practical to provide estimates of cost - effectiveness for those
measures. Some open space measures, however, present clear -cut cost saving
opportunities, and it is possible to automatically classify such measures as
highly cost - effective, irrespective of resulting GHG reductions. All open
space measures with cost savings potential and therefore high cost -
effectiveness are analyzed below. For all other open space measures, the cost -
effectiveness cannot reasonably be determined.
6 -53
T O W N OF L O S G A T O S
L O S G A T O S S U S T A I N A B I L I T Y PLAN
I M P L E M E N T A T I O N A N D M O N I T O R I N G
OS-I Community Garden and Urban Farm Sizes Inventory
Measure OS -1 directs the Town to identify and inventory potential commu-
nity garden and urban farm sites, and develop a program to establish commu-
nity gardens in appropriate locations.
i. Action Items and Responsible Parties
To implement this measure, the Town will conduct an inventory of potential
community garden sites and develop the associated community garden pro-
grams.
it Implementation Schedule
The Town will begin implementing this measure during the 2015 -2020 phase.
OS-2 Garden Areas in New Development
Measure OS -2 encourages significant new residential developments over 50
units to include space that can be used to grow food.
i. Action Items and Responsible Parties
To implement this measure, the Town will develop informational materials
and conduct outreach during the project review process to encourage devel-
opment applicants to include garden areas in large residential projects.
ii. Implementation Schedule
The Town will begin implementing this measure during the 2012 -2015 phase.
OS -3 Community Garden Process
Measure OS -3 directs the Town to establish a process through which a neigh-
borhood can propose and adopt a site as a community garden.
i. Action Items and Responsible Parties
To implement this measure, the Town will develop a process for the estab-
lishment of new community garden sites. Neighborhoods could take ad-
vantage of this new program to create new community garden sites, if inter-
ested.
6 -54
TOWN OF L O S G A T O S
L O S G A T O S S U S T A I N A B I L I T Y P L A N
I M P L E M E N T A T I O N A N D M O N I T O R I N G
ii. Implementation Schedule
The Town will begin implementing this measure during the 2015 -2020 phase.
OS -4 Los Gatos Farmers' Market
Measure OS -4 directs the Town to continue to support the Los Gatos Farm-
ers' Market as a source for locally -grown food.
i. Action Items and Responsible Parties
To implement this measure, the Town will continue to support the Farmers'
Market through outreach and institutional support.
A Implementation Schedule
The Town will begin implementing this measure during the 2012 -2015 phase.
OS -5 Public Food Benefits at the Farmers'Marlcet
Measure OS -5 encourages the Los Gatos farmers' market to accept food
stamps and other public food benefits.
i. Action Items and Responsible Parties
To implement this measure, the Town will coordinate with the organizers of
the Los Gatos' Farmers Market to encourage acceptance of public food bene-
fits.
11. Implementation Schedule
The Town will begin implementing this measure during the 2012 -2015 phase.
OS -6 Wildland Fire Prevention
Measure OS -6 directs the Town to continue to actively pursue wildland fire
prevention in forested areas of Los Gatos to avoid loss of carbon sequestra-
tion.
1. Action Items and Responsible Parties
To implement this measure, the Town will continue its wildland fire preven-
tion efforts in forested areas, including outreach to residents of these areas
about wlldland fire prevention.
6 -55
TOWN OF L O S G A T O S
L O S G A T O S S U S T A I N A B I L I T Y P L A N
I M P L E M E N T A T I O N A N D M O N I T O R I N G
it Cost Effectiveness: High
Costs to the Town from measure OS -6 are expected to be low to moderate
and would stem from materials and staff -time to conduct public outreach and
education regarding wildfire prevention strategies. Sources of additional di-
rect and indirect costs to residents could include, but are not limited to, fire -
resistant building materials, defensive landscaping, and burn restrictions.
Such costs would vary depending on what preventive actions are required or
voluntarily taken, and cannot be precisely predicted. However, the Town
and residents alike could potentially realize substantial savings through avert-
ed loss of life and property and reduced fire - fighting costs. While it is not
possible to precisely project such savings, fire prevention education efforts
alone have been shown to provide marginal benefits at anywhere from 10 to
95 times their cost." While wildfires make significant contributions to GHG
emissions," it is infeasible to precisely model impacts to GHG emissions
from this measure. GHG emissions from wildfires vary widely, and it is un-
realistic to speculate how many wildfires in the Los Gatos area may be pre-
vented or made less severe by implementation of this measure. Though it is
not practical to precisely quantify the costs, savings, or GHG reductions re-
sulting directly from this measure, wildfire prevention has been shown to be
in itself highly cost - effective. Therefore, this measure is deemed to be a high-
ly cost - effective GHG reduction strategy.
iii. Implementation Schedule
The Town will begin implementing this measure during the 2012 -2015 phase.
h. Community Action
As noted in Chapter 5, the community action measures would not result in
measureable reductions in GHG emissions in Los Gatos. Since projected
GHG emissions reductions from individual community action measures are
37 Prestemon, Jeff P., et al., 2010. Net Benefits of Wildfire Prevention Education
Efforts, Forest Science 56(2).
"Bonnicksen,T., Ph.D., 2008. Greenhouse Gas Emissions From Four California
Dildil es: Opportunities To Prevent and Reverse Environmental And Climate Impacts,
Forest Carbon and Emissions Model.
6 -56
TOWN OF LOS G A T O S
L O S G A T O S S U S T A I N A B I L I T Y P L A N
I M P L E M E N T A T I O N A N D M O N I T O R I N G
not available, it is not practical to provide estimates of cost - effectiveness for
those measures.
CA4 Local Business Participation
Measure CA -1 directs the Town to develop and implement an outreach plan
to engage local businesses in GHG emissions reduction programs.
J. Action Items and Responsible Parties
To implement this measure, the Town will develop and implement an out-
reach plan for local businesses. Local businesses could engage in GHG emis-
sion reductions programs on a volunteer basis.
A Implementation Schedule
The Town will begin implementing this measure during the 2015 -2020 phase.
CA -2 Sustainabilitylnformat7on Center
Measure CA -2 directs the Town to establish and maintain a `sustainability
information center' at the Town Hall or Library to inform the public and
distribute available brochures, and provide information on sustainability on
the Town's website.
i_ Action Items and Responsible Parties
To implement this measure, the Town will develop outreach materials, estab-
lish and maintain the sustainability information center, and regularly update
the Town's website with sustainability information.
A Implementation Schedule
The Town will begin implementing this measure during the 2012 -2015 phase.
CA -3 Los Gatos: Growing Greener Together Campaign
Measure CA -3 directs the Town to continue and expand the Los Gatos:
Growing Greener Together Campaign.
6 -57
TOWN OF LOS G A T O S
LOS GATOS SUSTAINABILITV PLAN
IMPLEMENTATION AND MONITORING
i. Action Items and Responsible Parties
To implement this measure, the Town will continue this existing program,
and expand it to provide information at public venues, such as the farmers'
market.
A Implementation Schedule
The Town will begin implementing this measure during the 2012 -2015 phase-
CA -4 Support for Local Businesses
Measure CA -4 directs the Town to continue economic vitality programs
aimed at supporting local business by encouraging residents to shop locally.
I Action Items and Responsible Parties
To implement this measure, the Town will continue existing economic vitali-
ty programs, such as the "Second Saturday" campaign.
ii. Implementation Schedule
The Town will begin implementing this measure during the 2012 -2015 phase.
CA -5 Support for Voluntary Programs
Measure CA -5 directs the Town to support voluntary programs to improve
sustainability in Los Gatos.
!. Action Items and Responsible Parties
To implement this measure, the Town will offer support, such as providing
information on the Town's website and conducting other outreach, to volun-
tary programs that improve sustainability.
ii. Implementation Schedule
The Town will begin implementing this measure during the 2015 -2020 phase.
2. Municipal Measures
As noted in Chapters 2 and 5, municipal operations represent a very small
fraction of total GHG emissions in Los Gatos. In part for this reason, the
GHG reduction measures for Town operations have not been individually
TOWN OF L O S G A T O S
L O S G A T O S S U S T A I N A B I L I T Y P L A N
I M P L E M E N T A T I O N A N D M O N I T O R I N G
modeled. Some municipal GHG reduction measures will, however, serve to
reduce emissions from Town operations. Since projected GHG emissions
reductions from individual municipal operations measures are not available, it
is generally not practical to provide estimates of cost - effectiveness for those
measures. Some municipal operations measures, however, present clear -cut
cost saving opportunities for the Town. It is possible to automatically classify
such measures as highly cost - effective, irrespective of resulting GHG reduc-
tions. All municipal measures with cost savings "potential" and therefore
high cost effectiveness include "cost effectiveness analysis below." For all
other municipal operations measures without an analysis, the cost -
effectiveness could not reasonably be determined.
a. Transportation and Land Use
TR -1 Reduced Emissions from Employee Commute
Measure TR -1 directs the Town to implement programs and provide incen-
tives to encourage reduced emissions from employee commutes, including
telecommuting, alternative work schedules, carpooling /vanpooling, and ac-
tive transportation.
1. Action Items and Responsible Parties
To implement this measure, the Town will develop programs and incentives
to reduce commutes from Town employees.
A Cost Effectiveness: High
The Town could realize savings through reduced employee parking and
transportation costs. A 2001 study found that commuter trip reduction pro-
grams had an average gross cost of $156 per employee per year; however, the
majority of businesses spent less, at a range of $33 to $89 per employee per
year. 39.40 Adjusted for inflation, the average annual per - employee cost of a
trip reduction program would be $202. Though this cost may seem high,
commuter trip reduction programs have frequently resulted in substantial
39 Pollution Probe, 2001. North American Workplace -based Trip Reduction Pro-
grammes.
49 Costs in 2001 dollars.
6 -59
TOWN OF LOS G A T O S
L O S G A T O S S U S T A I N A B I L I T Y P L A N
IMPLEMENTATION AND MONITORING
overall cost savings for both employers and workers. " Direct cost savings
come mainly from the reduced need for parking or parking subsidies. Addi-
tionally, telecommuting has enabled some companies to reduce their need for
office space. Indirect savings have been realized through improved worker
productivity, morale, and health. For employees, savings arise primarily
from reduced needs for vehicle maintenance and fuel. Indirect municipal and
community benefits are realized through decreased congestion, air pollution,
and infrastructure costs. Commuter trip reduction programs typically recoup
their costs and have a substantial potential to reduce VMT when coupled
with other strategies. Additional staff costs to implement this measure for the
Town are anticipated to be very low. Given low costs and substantial poten-
tial savings for the Town, this measure is deemed highly cost - effective.
iii. Implementation Schedule
The Town will begin implementing this measure during the 2012 -2015 phase.
TR -Z Support for Bicycle Commuting
Measure TR -2 directs the Town to provide bicycle lockers and showers at
Town offices, as well as offer education about bicycle commuting.
I Action Items and Responsible Parties
To implement this measure, the Town will purchase and place bicycle lockers
and construct shower facilities for bicycle commuters at Town offices. The
Town will also conduct education and outreach to Town employees about
bicycle commuting.
fl. Implementation Schedule
The Town will begin implementing this measure during the 2015 -2020 phase.
TR -3 Bicycles for Use by Town Employees
Measure TR -3 directs the Town to provide bicycles for short trips by Town
employees.
" Pollution Probe, 2001. North American Workplace -based Trip Reduction Pro-
grammes.
..1
TOWN OF LOS G A T O S
LOS GATOS SUSTAINABILITY PLAN
I M P L E M E N T A T I O N A N D M O N I T O R I N G
L Action Items and Responsible Parties
To implement this measure, the Town will purchase and maintain bicycles
for use by Town employees, and establish a program and policies for bicycle
use.
ii. Implementation Schedule
The Town will begin implementing this measure during the 2015 -2020 phase.
TR -4 Incentives for Low Emission Vehicles
Measure TR -4 directs the Town to provide preferential parking for low -
emissions vehicles at Town offices.
1. Action Items and Responsible Parties
To implement this measure, the Town will restripe and provide signage for
parking lots at Town offices to provide preferential parking for low- emissions
vehicles.
ii. Implementation Schedule
The Town will begin implementing this measure during the 2012 -2015 phase.
TR-5 Idlingin Town Vehicles
Measure TR -5 directs the Town to adopt a policy to limit idling in Town
vehicles consistent with public safety standards.
i. Action Items and Responsible Parties
To implement this measure, the Town will develop and adopt a policy to
limit idling in Town vehicles. Town employees will be subject to this new
policy.
it Cost Effectiveness: High
Staff-time costs for this measure are anticipated to be very low and would
stem from the need to draft and implement the appropriate operating policies.
Since the Town could experience substantial cost savings through reduced
fuel use, this measure is deemed highly cost - effective.
6 -61
TOWN OF L O S G A T O S
L O S G A T O S S U S T A I N A B I L I T Y P L A N
I M P L E M E N T A T I O N A N D M O N I T O R I N G
111. Implementation Schedule
The Town will begin implementing this measure during the 2012 -2015 phase.
TR -6 Efficiency in Town Fleet Vehicles
Measure TR -6 directs the Town to regularly maintain Town fleet vehicles to
maximize efficiency (e.g. tire pressure).
1. Action Items and Responsible Parties
To implement this measure, the Town will establish policies as needed to
ensure maximum vehicle efficiency through proper maintenance.
A Cost Effectiveness., High
Staff -time costs for this measure are anticipated to be very low and would
stem from the need to draft and implement the appropriate operating policies.
Similar to measure TR -5, measure TR -6 could result in lower fuel costs for
the Town, as well as lower life -time maintenance costs for Town vehicles.
Given these potential substantial cost savings, this measure is deemed highly
cost - effective.
it! . Implementation Schedule
The Town will begin implementing this measure during the 2012 -2015 phase.
b. Green Building
GB -1 LEED Certification in Municipal Buildings
Measure GB-1 encourages all new municipal buildings and facilities to meet at
least LEED Gold certification standards.
i. Action Items and Responsible Parties
To implement this measure, the Town will consider the feasibility of pursu-
ing LEED Gold certification when planning new municipal buildings and
facilities, and pursue this certification as appropriate.
ii. Cost Effectiveness- High
Staff time costs to potentially draft and adopt implementing language for this
measure would be very low. Building to LEED standards has generally been
6 -62
TOWN OF L O S G A T O S
L O S G A T O S S U S T A I N A B I L I T Y P L A N
I M P L E M E N T A T I O N A N D M O N I T O R I N G
shown to add $3 to $5 per square foot to building costs. For LEED Gold
certification specifically, overall building costs are on average 1.96 percent
higher than for a similar, conventional building. It has been found, however,
that these costs are far outweighed by quantifiable financial benefits accrued
over the lifetime of a LEED - certified building. For energy use alone, the av-
erage 20 -year net present value of a LEED building is $5.79 per square foot,
which is greater than the increase in per - square -foot cost." Even greater cost
savings would likely accumulate over the anticipated lifetime of a LEED
building, which extends well beyond 20 years. In addition to the more pre-
cisely estimable savings from reductions in waste, energy needs, and water
use, worker productivity and health gains add to the cost savings associated
with LEED buildings. Given its overall net cost savings this measure is
deemed highly cost-effective .13
1R. Implementation Schedule
The Town will begin implementing this measure during the 2012 -2015 phase.
GB -2 Rebates and Incentives for EnergyEfh'ciency
Measure G13-2 directs the Town to utilize all available rebates and incentives
for energy efficiency and distributed generation installations
i. Action Items and Responsible Parties
To implement this measure, the Town will research and pursue rebate and
incentive programs, such as State public good programs.
ii. Implementation Schedule
The Town will begin implementing this measure during the 2012 -2015 phase.
Energy- related 20 -year net present value (NPV) refers to the overall value of
energy savings over 20 years of building life, accounting for inflation and interest rates.
Positive NPVs indicate investments that have positive returns and are thus worth
malting.
as Kats, Greg, 2003. Report: The Costs and Financial Benefits of Green Buildings
6 -63
TOWN OF L O S G A T O S
L O S G A T O S S U S T A I N A B I L I T Y P L A N
I M P L E M E N T A T I O N A N D M O N I T O R I N G
GB -3 Green Building Training
Measure G13-3 directs the Town to train all plan review and building inspec-
tion staff in green building materials, techniques, and practices.
I Action Items and Responsible Parties
To implement this measure, the Town will either provide training for its plan
review and building inspection staff or send such staff to training programs
held by outside agencies.
fl. Implementation Schedule
The Town will begin implementing this measure during the 2012 -2015 phase.
c. Renewable Energy and Low Carbon Fuels
RE -1 Solar Energyfor Town Facilities
Measure RE -1 directs the Town to conduct a solar feasibility study and install
solar panels on appropriate Town facilities.
1. Action Items and Responsible Parties
To implement this measure, the Town will conduct the solar feasibility study,
and based on the results of that study, install solar panels on appropriate
Town facilities.
ii. Cost Effectiveness: High
Staff -time costs for this measure are anticipated to be moderate and would
stem from the need to either undertake or commission a solar feasibility
study. Should the Town opt to have such a study performed by a third party,
this could represent an additional cost. However, by identifying optimal lo-
cations, a feasibility study would serve to improve the cost effectiveness of
solar installations. This would ensure that those solar panels which are in-
stalled offer the greatest return on investment, thus offering long -run cost
savings to the Town. Therefore, this measure is deemed highly cost - effective.
(For a discussion of the cost - effectiveness of solar installations, see the cost
analysis for communitywide measure RE -3.)
6 -64
TOWN OF L O S G A T O S
L O S G A T O S S U S T A I N A B I L I T Y PLAN
I M P L E M E N T A T I O N A N D M O N I T O R I N G
iii. Implementation Schedule
The Town will begin implementing this measure during the 2012 -2015 phase.
RE-2 Solar WaterHeating at Town Facilities
Measure RE -2 directs the Town to install tankless and /or solar water heating
at appropriate Town facilities.
1. Action Items and Responsible Partles
To implement this measure, the Town will install tankless and /or solar water
heating at appropriate facilities.
ii. Cost Effectiveness: High
Staff time costs for this measure are anticipated to be low and would stem
from the need to initiate the installation of tankless or solar water heating
systems. According to evaluations conducted by consumer reports, tankless
water heaters usually do not represent a cost - effective alternative to storage
water heaters. " However, solar water heaters offer greater potential for cost -
effectiveness.45 Costs for solar water heating systems in an institutional set-
ting vary greatly depending upon the size of the building served and antici-
pated demands on the system. For reference, the National Renewable Energy
Laboratory estimates that costs for domestic solar water heating systems
range between approximately $2,200 and $5,850. Despite the high initial cost,
solar water heaters in institutional settings have been demonstrated to result
in long -term cost savings.46 Given potential long -run cost savings to the
Town, this measure is deemed highly cost- effective.
"Consumer Reports, 2008. Tankleu water heaters: They're efficient but ruiner
-
exsarily economical, http : / /www.consumerreports.org /cro /appliances /heating- cooling-
and- air /water - heaters /tankless- water - heaters /overview /tankless- water - heaters - ov.htm,
accessed on April 18 2012.
as EnergyS tar, Save Money and More with ENERCYSTAR Qualified Solar Watcr
Heaters, http: / /wvv .energystar.gov/ index .cfm ?c = solar_ wheat.pr_ savings_
benefits, accessed on May 1 2012.
"Federal Energy Management Program, 2004, Heating Water with Solar Ener-
gy Costs Less at the Phoenix Federal Correctional Institution.
6 -65
TOWN OF L O S G A T O S
L O S G A T O S S U S T A I N A B I L I T Y P L A N
I M P L E M E N T A T I O N A N D M O N I T O R I N G
iii. Implementation Schedule
The Town will begin implementing this measure during the 2012 -2015 phase.
RE -3 Town Fleet Conversion
Measure RE -3 directs the Town to convert the Town's vehicle fleet to hybrid,
compressed natural gas, biodiesel, electric, hydrogen fuel cells, or ethanol,
where technologically feasible and consistent with public safety standards.
L Action Items and Responsible Parties
To implement this measure, the Town will establish a policy directing all
departments to replace vehicles in the Town fleet with vehicles that use these
fuel types as appropriate.
ii. Implementation Schedule
The Town will begin implementing this measure during the 2012 -2015 phase.
RE -4 Fuel Conservation Program
Measure RE -4 directs the Town to establish a fuel conservation program for
the Town vehicle fleet and require Gas Cap driver training for all employees
who use fleet vehicles.
L Action Items and Responsible Parties
To implement this measure, the Town will develop the fuel conservation
program. In addition, to promote fuel efficiency, the Town will develop a
training program for all employees who use fleet vehicles.
ii. Cost Effectiveness., High
Staff -time costs for this measure are anticipated to be low and would stem
from the need to draft and implement the appropriate operating policies, as
well as train Town employees. Similar to transportation measures TR -5 and
TR -6, measure RE -4 could result in lower fuel costs for the Town. Given
these potential substantial cost savings, this measure is deemed highly cost -
effective.
• e,
TOWN OF LOS G A T O S
L O S G A T O S S U S T A I N A B I L I T Y P L A N
I M P L E M E N T A T I O N A N D M O N I T O R I N G
iii. Implementation Schedule
The Town will begin implementing this measure during the 2012 -2015 phase.
d. Energy Conservation
Since the energy conservation measures would all serve to reduce energy use
related to municipal operations, they all have the potential to be highly cost
effective. However, without precise estimates of measure costs or, more im-
portantly, energy savings, it is not feasible to conclusively establish the cost -
effectiveness of these measures. Nevertheless, given the level of cost effec-
tiveness generally demonstrated by most energy conservation measures, it is
predicted that implementation of all of the energy conservation measures
would be highly cost effective.
EC -I EnergyAuditof Town Facilities
Measure EC -1 directs the Town to conduct, with assistance from PG &E, a
thorough energy audit of all Town facilities to identify cost - effective oppor-
tunities for conservation.
L Action Items and Responsible Parties
To implement this measure, the Town will coordinate with PG &E to con-
duct energy audits of Town facilities.
A Implementation Schedule
The Town will begin implementing this measure during the 2012 -2015 phase.
EC-2 Reflective Roofing on Town Facilities
Measure EC -2 directs the Town to install reflective roofing on Town facili-
ties.
1. Action Items and Responsible Parties
To implement this measure, the Town will install reflective roofing on Town
facilities.
A Implementation Schedule
The Town will begin implementing this measure during the 201 -2020 phase.
6 -67
TOWN OF L O S G A T O S
L O S G A T O S S U S T A I N A B I L I T Y P L A N
IMPLEMENTATION AND MONITORING
EC -3 Energy Efficiency Standards for Town Facilities
Measure EC -3 directs the Town to establish energy efficiency standards for
Town facilities and provide employees with guidelines, instructions, and re-
quirements for efficient use of facilities.
I Action Items and Responsible Parties
To implement this measure, the Town will develop and adopt energy effi-
ciency standards for Town facilities and educate Town staff on efficient use of
facilities.
it Implementation Schedule
The Town will begin implementing this measure during the 2012 -2015 phase.
EC -4 Peak Electricity Demand Reduction
Measure EC -4 directs the Town to participate in peak electricity demand re-
duction programs and undertake peak demand reduction measures at Town
facilities.
1. Action Items and Responsible Parties
To implement this measure, the Town will reduce electricity demands in
peak periods and participate in peak electricity demand reduction programs.
11. Implementation Schedule
The Town will begin implementing this measure during the 2012 -2015 phase.
EC-5 Energy- E£ficientAppllancesand Office Equipment
Measure EC -5 directs the Town to replace outdated electronic appliances and
office equipment with energy- efficient models.
1. Action Items and Responsible Parties
To implement this measure, the Town will establish a policy to replace appli-
ances and equipment with energy- efficient models when existing equipment
becomes outdated and requires replacement.
GIIO
TOWN OF L O S G A T O S
L O S G A T O S S U S T A I N A B I L I T Y P L A N
I M P L E M E N T A T I O N A N D M O N I T O R I N G
ii. Implementation Schedule
The Town will begin implementing this measure during the 2012 -2015 phase,
EC -6 Street and Traffic Light Retrofits
Measure EC -6 directs the Town to continue to retrofit street lights and traffic
lights to light - emitting diodes (LED).
i. Action Items and Responsible Parties
To implement this measure, the Town will continue to retrofit street and
traffic lights.
ii. Implementation Schedule
The Town will begin implementing this measure during the 2012 -2015 phase.
e. Water and Wastewater
WWI Water- ConservingFixturesin Town Facilities
Measure WW -1 directs the Town to install water - conserving fixtures in all
Town facilities.
1. Action Items and Responsible Parties
To implement this measure, the Town will install water - conserving fixtures
in Town facilities.
it Cast Effectiveness: High
Staff -time costs for this measure are anticipated to be low and would stem
from the need to initiate and manage the installation of water- efficient fix -
tures. In other institutional settings, water - conserving fixtures have been
shown to result in substantial cost savings which can offer simple payback
times of as little as 2.12 years —as in the case of the Portland, Oregon Veter-
ans' Affairs Medical Center. While overall Town operations in Los Gatos can
generally be expected to have lower water use than a typical medical facility,
the success of the Portland conservation program nonetheless indicates a
strong potential for long -term savings for the Town. Therefore, this measure
is deemed highly cost - effective.
6 -69
TOWN OF LOS G A T O S
L O S G A T O S S U S T A I N A B I L I T Y P L A N
IMPLEMENTATION AND MONITORING
in. Implementation Schedule
The Town will begin implementing this measure during the 2012 -2015 phase.
WW-2 Landscaping at Town Facilities
Measure WW -2 directs the Town to use drought - tolerant native landscaping
at Town facilities.
i. Action Items and Responsible Parties
To implement this measure, the Town will establish a policy to use drought -
tolerant native landscaping at Town facilities.
A Cost Effectiveness: High
As with communitywide standards for drought tolerant landscaping or xeri-
scaping, the Town could potentially experience significant savings from land-
scaping that is less water intense. Given that such landscaping has strong po-
tential to result in long -term cost savings for the Town, this measure is
deemed highly cost - effective.
iii. Implementation Schedule
The Town will begin implementing this measure during the 2012 -2015 phase.
WW -3 Irrigation for Town Landscaping
Measure WW -3 directs the Town to use recycled water or graywater for
Town landscaping, including parks and medians, where appropriate.
i. Action Items and Responsible Parties
To implement this measure, the Town will install necessary infrastructure
and use recycled water or graywater for Town landscaping where appropri-
ate.
it Implementation Schedule
The Town will begin implementing this measure during the 2015 -2020 phase.
6 -70
TOWN OF LOS G A T O S
LOS GATOS Sn STAINABILITY PLAN
I M P L E M E N T A T I O N A N D M O N I T O R I N G
f. Solid Waste
SW -1 Recycling Coordinators
Measure SW -1 directs the Town to train an existing staff member from each
Town department to be a recycling coordinator for their department.
i. Action Items and Responsible Parties
To implement this measure, the Town will train a staff member from each
department to be a recycling coordinator.
ii. Implementation Schedule
The Town will begin implementing this measure during the 2012 -2015 phase.
SW-2 Reuse and Recycled Content Materials
Measure SW -2 requires all Town departments and facilities to reuse office
supplies, furniture, and computers before buying new materials. When buy-
ing new materials, products must be made with high levels of post- consumer
recycled content and have limited packaging.
i. Action Items and Responsible Parties
To implement this measure, the Town will establish a reuse and purchasing
policy regarding recycled content and packaging.
A Implementation Schedule
The Town will begin implementing this measure during the 2012 -2015 phase.
g. Open Space
0S-1 Tree Planting on Municipal Property
Measure OS -1 directs the Town to develop program for maximizing carbon
sequestration on municipal property through tree planting.
I Action Items and Responsible Parties
To implement this measure, the Town will develop a tree planting program.
ii. Implementation Schedule
The Town will begin implementing this measure during the 2015 -2020 phase.
6 -71
TOWN OF LOS G A T O S
L O S G A T O S S U S T A I N A B I L I T Y P L A N
I M P L E M E N T A T I O N A N D M O N I T O R I N G
h. Purchasing
PI Local Hiring
Measure P -1 directs the Town to develop program to require or encourage the
Town to hire locally for its contracts and services.
I Action Items and Responsible Parties
To implement this measure, the Town will develop a local hiring program for
contracts and services.
ti. Implementation Schedule
The Town will begin implementing this measure during the 2015 -2020 phase.
P-2 Sustamability Criteria in Proposal Selection Process
Measure P -2 directs the Town to request that proposals or applications in-
clude information about the sustainability practices of the organization, and
use such information as a partial basis for proposal evaluations.
I Action Items and Responsible Parties
To implement this measure, the Town will develop a proposal and applica-
tion requirement to include information about the sustainability practices of
the organization, and will incorporate such information into the evaluation
criteria.
ii. Implementation Schedule
The Town will begin implementing this measure during the 2015 -2020 phase.
P -3 Life -Cycle Costing Approach in Purchasing
Measure P -3 directs the Town to incorporate a "life -cycle costing" approach
into Town purchasing considerations that takes into account long -term cost
savings from energy- efficient products.
I Action Items and Responsible Parties
To implement this measure, the Town will incorporate a life -cycle costing
approach into purchasing policies.
IC3Pta
TOWN OF L O S G A T O S
L O S G A T O S S U S T A I N A B I L I T Y P L A N
I M P L E M E N T A T I O N A N D M O N I T O R I N G
A Implementation Schedule
The Town will begin implementing this measure during the 2015 -2020 phase.
i. Community Action
CA -1 Green Business Program
Measure CA -1 directs the Town to continue to operate a townwide green
business program.
L Action Items and Responsible Parties
To implement this measure, the Town will continue to operate the green
business program.
it Implementation Schedule
The Town will begin implementing this measure during the 2012 -2015 phase.
CA-2 SustainabildrCoordmator
Measure CA -2 directs the Town to train an existing staff member to be a sus -
tainability coordinator for the Town.
I Action Items and Responsible Parties
To implement this measure, the Town will identify and train the staff mem-
ber to be a sustainability coordinator.
A Implementation Schedule
The Town will begin implementing this measure during the 2015 -2020 phase.
CA -3 Incentives for Sustainable Business Practices
Measure CA -3 directs the Town to reward local businesses that hire local res-
idents and allow telecommuting by, for example, recognition on the Town
website or in Town newsletters, or preference in Town purchasing.
I Action Items and Responsible Parties
To implement this measure, the Town will identify local businesses that meet
the measure's criteria, and develop a reward system.
6 -73
TOWN OF L O S G A T O S
L O S G A T O S S U S T A I N A B I L I T Y P L A N
I M P L E M E N T A T I O N A N D M O N I T O R I N G
fl. Implementation Schedule
The Town will begin implementing this measure during the 2015 -2020 phase.
B. Implementation Funding
One of the main barriers to seeing through an implementation plan is lack of
available funds. There are multiple grant and loan programs through State,
federal, and regional sources to combat the effects of GHGs. With the estab-
lishment of this SustainahLbLy Plan, Los Gatos is in a position to apply for
funding to implement the supporting measures in a timely fashion. Funding
sources may include the Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC)
and Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG), as a well as State and
federal agencies with similar programs.
One federal funding source is the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act
of 2009 (ARRA). As part of this program the Department of Energy admin-
istered Energy Efficiency Conservation Block Grants, and in September 2010,
Los Gatos received a $162,712 allocation for a project to install energy -
efficient lighting in municipal parking lots and parks. In January 2012, the
Town Council authorized an application for Phase 2 funding from this pro-
gram, which would enable the Town to recapture unused program funds for
street light conversion projects. While another federal stimulus package is
not anticipated in the near future, the Department of Energy or another fed-
eral department may continue to occasionally offer funding or grants for Sim-
ilar projects. Other federal funding may be available through the EPA, which
offers a wide selection of grants at varying time intervals. Some grants which
Los Gatos could potentially seek during their respective application periods
include:
e Non - Construction Market -based Approaches to Reducing GHG Emis-
sions through Energy Efficiency in Homes & Buildings grants.
e Community Action for a Renewed Environment (CARE) grants.
6 -74
TOWN OF LOS G A T O S
L O S G A T O S S U S T A I N A B I L I T Y P L A N
I M P L E M E N T A T I O N A N D M O N I T O R I N G
o Solid Waste Assistance grants.
e Source Reduction Assistance grants.
California State departments, such as CalRecycle and the California Energy
Commission, have at times offered grants or other funding for climate or sus -
tainability programs. Pursuant to Senate Bill (SB) 1754, the California Alter-
native Energy and Advanced Transportation Financing Authority offers pro-
grams that, among other things, support distributed generation of renewable
energy, as well as energy or water efficiency improvements. Additionally,
California's implementation of GHG Cap and Trade programs could offer
new sources of funding. While it remains uncertain how program revenues
would be allocated, some proposals, such as that to create a GHG Reduction
Account, could lead to funding availability for local governments. Also at the
State level, Assembly Bill (AB) 2466 mandates that local governments be paid
for the excess renewable energy they generate, offering another potential rev-
enue Stream.
Beyond the grants and programs offered by the State, there are also a variety
of local or regional agencies and programs that have the potential to offer
additional funding or support. As part of its regional planning efforts, MTC
provides multiple grant opportunities under its Climate Initiatives Program.
There may also be opportunities to pursue funding through private charitable
organizations, such as the Hewlett Foundation, which offers grants through
its Bay Area Communities and Energy & Climate programs.
With the funding from federal programs, current State legislation and pro-
grams, and grant opportunities like those above, Los Gatos is likely to receive
assistance in seeing through its climate action goals and measures.
C Plan Adaptation, Re- Inventory, and Monitoring
This Sustainability Plan represents Los Gatos' communitywide response to
the effects of GHGs as of the time of this documents preparation. The field
6 -75
T O W N OF L O S G A T O S
L O S G A T O S S U S T A I N A B I L I T Y P L A N
I M P L E M E N T A T I O N A N D M O N I T O R I N G
of climate action planning is rapidly evolving. Over the next decade, new
information about the effects and risks of GHGs is likely to emerge, new
GHG reduction strategies and technologies will be developed, and State and
federal legislation are likely to advance. Therefore, in order to remain rele-
vant and to be as effective as possible, the Sustainability Plan must evolve
over time.
The Town will be responsible for continually monitoring the Town's pro-
gress towards meeting the GHG emissions reduction target. The Sustainabil-
ity Plan, as a whole, will be reviewed and modified every three years to evalu-
ate implementation and achievement of measure reductions and to identify
potential plan update needs.
As part of the monitoring evaluation, the Town will re- inventory their GHG
emissions. The process of conducting a re- inventory will allow the Town to
monitor progress and report results toward local emissions reduction targets
and identify opportunities to integrate new or improved measures into the
emissions reduction plan. If forecast target reductions are not being met, the
Department will determine which measures are not achieving the target and
which measures are exceeding the target. As new technology comes online
each year, the Department will consider improvements to climate science,
explore new opportunities for GHG reduction and climate adaptation, and
determine what innovations can be implemented to help reduce emissions to
reach reduction targets.
6 -76
Los Gatos Sustainability Plan - Appendices
October 15, 2012
Prepared For; The Town of Los Gatos
Los Gatos Sustainability Plan - Appendices
October 15, 2012
Prepared For: The Town of Los Gatos
A P P E N D I X A
C O M M U N I T Y W O R K S H O P
SUMMARY
Community Workshop Summary
Project: Los Gatos Sustainability Plan Community Workshop #1 Date: January 30, 2012
❑ Safe facilities for those who can't drive
❑ Sidewalks and pedestrian connections
❑ Improve biking and walking for kids to parks and schools
❑ Collaborate with school districts on school buses
❑ Zero tolerance for speeding near schools to improve safety of walking or biking
❑ Lights in commercial buildings after hours
❑ Allow EV to park in surplus spots after business hours
o Do not support - spots are needed
❑ Concern about traffic /idling and solid waste at special events
❑ Help homeowners /property owners find sources of loans for energy upgrades
❑ Centralized parking downtown and increasing focus on bikes and pedestrians like in Mountain View and Santa
Monica
❑ More crosswalks, especially on Los Gatos Blvd.
❑ Don't replace water -using landscaping with hardscaping /impervious surfaces
❑ Support rain catchment systems
❑ Keep permit prices for alternative energy improvements low
❑ Work with school districts on implementing bus transp.
❑ Convert fleet to electric /natural gas
❑ Develop and implement complete streets - retrofit existing streets when pre -paved with bike lanes
• Support voluntary programs like Green @home
• Ban plastic bags * ** (the three stars indicate that three more people supported this comment)
• "Not nearly enough - 20 years too late"
❑ Public health connections - waking, biking
• Wildland fire prevention (avoid loss of carbon sequestration in trees)
• Measures OS- 3/OS -5 - disagree with these measures
• Measure CA -2 - don't use printed materials for outreach /education - focus on on -line resources instead to save paper
• Free /reduced cost shuttle is unused
❑ Measure P -2 - will increase the cost of bids
❑ Educate (to provide the opportunity) before Require (one size /thing does not fit all)
❑ Incentives and grants for energy conservation - partner with PG &E
A P P E N D I X B
INVENTORY AND FORECAST
M O D ELI N G F I L FS
2008 and 2020 Land Use and Population & Housing Summary
Residential a Growth (units) Under the 2020 General Plan
Additional
(Units)
Total (units)
Single- Family 12130 177 12,307
Total Residential 12130 1,600 13.730
Non - Residential a Growth (SQFT) Under the 2020 General Plan
Number of Acres by Land Use Designation
Number of Town
Land Use Designation Acres in Town Percent of Total
Hillside Residential (1 DU /Ac) 1,730 28%
Low Density Residential (1 -5
DU /Ac)
Existing (SQFT)
Additional
Development (SQFT)
Total (SQFT)
Commercial
1,924,870
419,210
2,344,080
Office
1,630,480
516,000
2,146,480
Industrial
526,000
8,000
534,000
Total Non - Residential
4,081,350
943,210
5,024,560
Employment
18,820
2,660
21,480
Number of Acres by Land Use Designation
Number of Town
Land Use Designation Acres in Town Percent of Total
Hillside Residential (1 DU /Ac) 1,730 28%
Low Density Residential (1 -5
DU /Ac)
1,649
27%
Medium Density Residential (5-
Industrial
61
12 DU /Ac)
510
8%
High Density Residential (12-
20 DU /Ac)
64
1%
Mobile Home Park (5 -12
DU /Ac)
0
0%
Mixed -Use Commercial
144
2%
Central Business District (FAR
0.6)
43
1%
Neighborhood Commercial
65
1%
Service Commercial
18
0%
Office Professional
65
1%
Light Industrial
61
1%
Public
135
2%
Agriculture
339
5%
Open Space
1,393
22%
Total
6,216
1
Summary of Land Use
Commercial
270
Office
65
Industrial
61
Total Non - Residential
396 9%
4,349 100%
Transportation
Baseline Transportation Emissions
Based an EMFAC2011
Veh
Percent of WIT
NOx
N20
CO2
CO20
CO2w /Pavley+
CO2ew /Pavley+
LCF
LCFS
All Other Buses
0.0%
3
0
308
337
308
337
LOA
53.4%
104
3
95,347
96,374
95,347
96,374
LOT7
5.7%
24
1
11,732
11,966
11,732
11,966
LOT2
19.0%
55
2
46,226
46,767
46,226
46,767
LHD1
3.3%
44
1
14,900
15,329
14,900
15,329
LHD2
0.5%
10
0
1,844
1,942
1,844
1,942
MY
0.5%
9
0
1,230
1,321
1,230
1,321
MDV
13.8%
47
2
42,306
42,771
42,306
42,771
MH
0.2%
8
0
807
882
807
882
Motor Coach
0.0%
4
0
466
511
466
511
OBUS
0.1%
1
0
327
340
327
340
PTO
00%
4
0
472
509
472
509
SBUS
0.1%
4
0
381
417
381
417
T6 Ag
0.0%
1
0
61
66
61
66
T6 CARP heavy
0.0%
0
0
4
4
4
4
T6 CARP small
0.0%
0
0
12
13
12
13
T6 instate construction heavy
=%
2
0
248
269
248
269
T6 instate construction small
0A%
6
0
736
791
736
791
T6 instate heavy
0,2%
12
0
1,416
1,537
1,416
1,537
T6 instate small
0.7%
32
1
4,204
4,516
4,204
4,516
T6 00S heavy
0.0%
0
0
2
2
2
2
T6 00S small
0.0%
0
0
7
7
7
7
T6 publc
0.0%
1
0
167
181
167
181
T6 ulil0y
0.0%
0
0
29
31
29
31
T6TS
0.1%
4
0
527
567
527
567
T7 Ag
0.0%
3
0
251
277
251
277
T7 CARP
0.3%
23
1
2,682
2,911
2,682
2,911
T7 CARP construction
0.0%
3
0
324
351
324
351
T7 NNOOS
0.3%
20
1
3,057
3,254
3,057
3,254
T7NOOS
0.1%
8
0
983
1,067
983
1,067
T7 other pan
0.0%
4
0
298
335
298
335
T7POAK
0.1%
13
0
1,050
1,181
1,050
1,181
T7 POLA
0.0%
0
0
0
0
0
0
T7 public
0.0%
2
0
193
213
193
213
T7 Single
0.2%
14
0
1,615
1,756
1,615
1,756
T7 single construction
0.1%
7
0
831
904
631
904
T7 SWCV
0.0%
5
0
482
527
482
527
T7 tractor
0.5%
46
1
4,826
5,283
4,826
5,283
T7 tractor construction
011%
6
0
620
679
620
679
T7 utility
0.0%
0
0
33
36
33
36
T71S
0.0%
1
0
72
84
72
84
UBUS
0.1%
15
0
1,697
1,841
1.697
1,841
TOTAL
646
17
242,772
248,146
0 242,772
248,146
WO emissions were cakulared using an off model adjustment provided by CMB N
AB 32 Technical Appendices. Tile off-rowel
adNSlmeid uses a linear regression eiv a ating N20
wdh NOx (NM =
Doi i velvcles miles tMVebd (VMT) muMplied by 347 dayLyearto aecouM kr reduced hasac on weekends and holidrys_ This assumption is mnsislent wdh the Cafdomia Air Resources Boarts (GARB)
methoolo" within the Claude Change secret, Pion Measure Dacumenlalon Supplement.
Forecast Year 2020 Business as Usual and Reduction Scenario
Year Dapy WT Annual WT
Veh
Percent of VMT
Noe
N20
CO2
CO2e
CO2w /Pavley+
CO2ew /Pavley+
LCF
LCFS
All Other Buses
0./%
1
0
405
416
364
375
LOA
0A%
30
1
116,838
117,136
80,657
80,955
LDT1
0.1%
9
0
14,340
14,427
10,531
10,618
LDT2
0.0%
17
1
53,228
53,397
40,373
40,542
LHD1
0.0%
27
1
15,799
16,065
14,219
14,485
LHD2
0.0%
5
0
2,001
2,052
1,801
1,852
MCY
0.0%
11
0
1,460
1,568
1,314
1,422
MDV
0.1%
24
1
44,904
45,138
35,490
35,725
MH
0.2%
4
0
934
976
840
883
Motor Coach
0.7%
1
0
629
643
566
580
OBUS
0.0%
1
0
290
298
261
269
PTO
0.0%
2
0
703
722
632
651
SBUS
0.0%
3
0
378
404
340
366
T6 Ag
0.0%
0
0
60
62
54
56
T6 CAIRP heavy
0.2%
0
0
5
5
4
4
T6 CAIRP small
0.0%
0
0
15
16
14
14
T6 instate construction heavy
0.4%
1
0
209
215
188
194
T6 instate construction small
0.0%
1
0
558
565
502
509
T6 instate heavy
0.4%
5
0
1,779
1,828
1,601
1,650
T6 instate small
0.1%
6
0
4,976
5,040
4,478
4,542
T6 00S heavy
0.0%
0
0
3
3
2
2
T6 005 small
01%
0
0
9
9
8
8
T6 public
0.0%
1
0
222
230
200
207
T6 utility
0.0%
0
0
36
37
32
33
T6TS
02%
2
0
775
791
698
714
T7 Ag
0.1 %
1
0
262
271
236
245
T7 CAIRP
01%
7
0
4,162
4,234
3,746
3,818
T7 CAIRP construction
07%
0
0
262
267
236
240
T7NNOOS
0.0%
6
0
4,718
4,780
4,246
4,308
T7NOOS
00%
3
0
1,539
1,567
1,385
1,413
T7 other port
00%
2
0
398
415
358
376
T7POAK
0.1%
10
0
2,191
2,287
1,972
2,068
T7 POLA
0.1%
0
0
0
0
0
0
T7 public
0.0%
2
0
266
281
239
254
T7 Single
0.0%
7
0
2,458
2,524
2,212
2,279
T7 single construction
0.0%
2
0
660
679
594
613
T7 SWCV
0.0%
3
0
657
684
591
618
T7 tractor
0.0%
18
1
7,268
7,447
6,541
6,721
1-7tractorconsvuction
0.0%
1
0
492
505
442
456
T7 utility
0.0%
0
0
42
43
38
39
T71S
a0%
1
0
118
128
106
117
UBUS
00%
15
0
1,885
2,028
1.696
1,840
TOTAL
228
7
287,932
290,182
0 219,812
222,062
WO emissions were czloulated using an off -model adjustment provided by CRABia AB 32 Tarhma l Appendices. Th. off -model adjustment uses a linear regression correlating N20 w1b NOC(N20=
OailyvMiles miles Reveled (VMT) mu3ip5ed by 347 daysyear to account far reduced here, on weekends and holidays. This assumption is personal the Contends or Resources Boards (CARD)
methodology within the climate Change 5copmg Pun Measure Documenlamin supplement.
i
ry
ry
r
16
o
o
T
d
Y
d
O
O
O
+
O
O
O
W
W
W
W
W
W
U' u
O
°o
N
LL
WU
O
M
m
0
O
p
O
O
O
N
O
�
O
R
Gw
G
aemT
N
p
�m O
±
w
w
wN
w
u
!q
w
+
w
w
w
I
w
NH I d
n
m
N
N
n
aO
W
O
M
Of
N
N
eni
b�!m
MT
n W
tN.-0
b O
i
'-b
N N
h
M
U q
'.
a
m
V
O1
W'N
j
W
n
M
6
+
o 0
°W
o
°
94
°'.
4
90
c
Q
I
W
W W
N
W
W N
O
W
W
O
Lb
!
6
n
N
O
M
T
e1
'1°
W
T Lq
n m
ei
n
Kp I
! M
O
W
W
W
W
9
o
n
, n
n 9
+ 0
9
O 9
9
9
9 9 q O
9
9
W
9
W O
W lN
f
ON
yN
j
O
N
ei
W
W
+
O
2
On 1
%
t p
r1 l
M
n
0
eN i
W
O
N
OV l
N
ui,
O
O l
W
N
m
N
m
M
U
Z
N
f0 l
eV N
I
0+1
V
m
N
M
[O
R
l 0
N
rl
ryj
N
N
W
� N
V
m e-1
O]
IYI
T
N
!
m
m
a
m
o0
0
0
011
v
N
'�
v
v
y
lr
V
O
N
N
eN.l
m
O
O
m
a
I
"
o
o
w
f
W
N
ry
N
w
'i
W
b
n
O
14
N
n
N
m
m
!
N
N
N
P�
e-i
N
N
T
C
1
O,
U m
N
m
T
N
N
d 1
m
y
O
O
'
n
w
NI
Q
x
E
x
x
E"
x
x
E
x
'L
N
O 4l
Q
o�.E
N
..
N'
c
o
E
W
£ o.E
��
•i
c
C o f
N
El
�nld
C
.'
F
E
}
C
�.
o;E
O
f
O~
FI
O~ W
2
1_O-'
S
0I2
-w
U
0
F
-N
J
.G
J
_w.
.d.'«
.d.
.d,
«
.d,
.d. ::'
,d„i ,d, 1,
�.G
y
do
j
m
K,KW
2K��
KGB
CK"O'
��.._�
N
t
O O
O
N
N
O
0 0
OI O d
0
0
O
N
E'
=oE
in
>
Q
W
£
E
+oEwu
w wu
wIw'u
w
wo
N
W U
W
W.
V
W
W - -U
W
J
V
�I
9
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
y
b
m
m
o
o
n
ry
N
N
n
O
W
O
W
M
m
IV
d
N
T
0
al
s
N
A
O
w
+
w
+
w
O
w
O
w
O
�:+
O
O
w
0o
n
o
m
o
b
w
o
0
m'
Cl
o
v
b
ri
o
ry
o
d
o
0
u
o
ni
d
�6
d
d
0
N
X LL
U
M
d
0
O
q
O
p
OW
a
i' b
O
O
O
O
OO
o
O
MOYl
,' M
n
+
W
W
4
4
W
W
1W
+
W
W
+
qjq
q
+
q
q
O
f
ODd
n
W
W
W
1W
N
N
r
O
A
m
0
W
O
m
N
M
M
tD
Y1
W
n
OI
bl�-1
ej
N
ei
M
N
n
n'b
y
N�
N'
OI
M
ri'
ri
n
VI
ei'
ei'
N
M
U q
6
X
W
M
cs
O
M
M
O
O
M
M
n
V
W
W
W
W
O
g
q
q
+
q
9q
W
O
O
O
~
CO
Oq
1
Q
W
q
IM
w
N
N
W
N
W n
M
N
d
OD
eV i
p
d
M
N
d
m
N
rl
U
b
1
00
n
O
W
.4
N
A
O
(m
D)
M
n
N
N
N
ti
M
V
x
o
r
n
w
b
b
o
b
o+
.�
.W n
m
M
.n
m
m
D
oq
W
q
g
q
q
g
q
q
q
092
9999
q
~�
W
N
d
W
n
W
O
Y!
M
Vl
W
N
W
r
N
d
b
N
Ol
W
W
OI�N
W
N
O
W
Ol
n
O
W
Ol
W
d
W
M
W
M
m
K
N
N
�If
rl
cO
M
d
d
O
Of
1�
b
N
N
Of
VI
m
[O
n
N
N
N
N
m
m
N
ei
O
m
Q
d
r
b
Ci
b
OI
Wd
A
d
ti
N
N
ri
M
N
(V
M
-i
A
n
M
.4
A
W
d
N'
N
N
N
Z
a
w
b
o
^
ry
o
b
0
0
f
n
O�
N
Ol
d
b
.ai
O
1
.-f
d
6
m
f
b
nr
O
N
W
N
Ol
N
o
r
o
n
w
o
n
m
�
r
N
M
ei
ry
d
N
T
C
�
M
v
o
i
Cq
M
w
o
w
d
U
m
e
N
E
N°
E
N° E
a
F
C f
O, C �'
F
I
L
r.....
¢
b
ol,« «
?' «
�0N a,
¢ z
K
H
0
O
O O
o0
0
m
E
E
E
w U
o
U
E o
W
E
E
WlWIV
E
W'. U
pl
0
0
0
+
0
o
�
w
. LL
T
N
01
N
VI
M
ryj
rl
yj
Y
O m
2
O
p
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
Url
y
W
W
O
m N
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
0
O
LL
F j
O
O O
O
M
4
m
94
f 0
0
O M
O M
n
O
M
m
p b
-
9
9
b
O N
O
O
O
,2 �
O
O
I T
m
N
O
V
N
M
N
W
M
W
m
W
N
W
O
W
N
1�
m
ei
2
m
n
O
N W
M
N I�
O
M
N
M
N
M
N
n
N
M
N
O
N
Mery
h
M
N
W
M
N
W
N
m
V
ri
rl.l0
ei
N
ei
fV
N
ei
'1
'_O
b
e1
N
rl
'1
e-1
N
(V
ryl
ei
e4
CO
A
A
A
M
b
A
q
6
X
W
M
MO ^^l
O
M
4 M4
W
pO
p
O
Q
W
W W
y�j
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
2
2
2
2
2
M N
Onr,b
N
r
N
M
b
M
O
1�
cY
N
NI
l�
pm
m
N
M
N
y
M
N
Nn
I
n
W
m
N
W
ry
M
O
rli
'1 10
e4
ei
e4
(V
N
ri
A
V
6
A
N
N
ei
ei
A
N
M
e. r.
(O
ei
ei
e.
KI
t0
e.
V
X
W
O
b'blri
Q
Q r
M
4
b
b
O
9
4
9
9
9
b
p
b
0
4
0
O
0
9
9
O
O
b
p
b
M
O M
l0
t0
N
m
b
W W
W..
Y
yL
W
2
g
q
V
W
4
4
M
1M �
m
W
W
W
W
O
Ol
D] N
h
W
W
"i
ei
r4
rl
<
O
Of
Q�
� r•I
N'
ri
ry
2
r.,
N
OI
Of
IOO
ri
Of
CO
N
O
W
O
O
O
O
O
o
O
H
F
O
C
O
O
O
y
N
b
O
O
y
V
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
W
6
m
b
m
a
N
b
1�
N
N
t0
N
N
?r`
C
S
10
'1
�
p
Ell
A
�
O
U'.
_
E�
t
.;
E
N
-
m.
°
°
�.
E
'..,
E
ail
E
-.
a
x
E
».
E
N
C
E N
x
°
E
E
LL
o..E
N
o.E
c
o
E
2
o
f
o1
o
N
N
f
2
.,
W
b
F
N
0
ryry
6
b
f
q
0
O
C C
O
o
~
~
n
C
c
9
C
.v.
-.2.2t
N 0
_p.
N
�
0 o Cdr
o
0
0
Nd
i
N
N`
N
yO_�
N
V
N
°o! w
E E `o
E
E'. `o �r
EE
`o
b
r
E E
-oE
Eu
N
N., i
W W V
W
W.0
WSW
V
W W
U
W
W
w w1 u°
wuEi
u
w
o
w
o
0
w
0
w
o
w
o
w
T
N
N
O
N
N
N
N
D
Y
a
a
O
w
O
w
O
w
O
w
O
O
w
O
w
N _UI
m a
O
O
N
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
N
LL
o 0~ +
o W
q
0999
W
4W
4
4
w
919
9
qW
0
Q mn
' M
n
0
W
o M
o
o b W
0
W
9
9
2 n
N
O
o M W
M W
0
I T
O
NiM
W Q
b
MIN
W
m
W 'I
N
{p
W
2
N
N
O
Nl
Mj0
' N
N
W
a!
O I
r-:
'
p
N
W n
n
d
W M
O
N
N a
Q
ei'.
e'I
d
fl
ei
rl
lIl
w
N
N
e1
;N
VI
n
d
OJ
n
e4
N
N
e4
e1
Q
d
(V
Olin
!1
r4
ei
N
Ol
N
OI
ei
n
N'
N
l0
n
N
OIb
"I.
U m
6
W
O
M
O
W
N
O
p
OO
O
MIL
O
0
Q
00
O
M
O4'iw
M
n
.999
O
m OM
O
n
0019 N
M
W
w
w
w
w
ib w
w
W.w
w
w
w
iO
W
lu
w
I"'
o
;O c
m
mIiW-i
1p
IO
M.N
N
b
N.N
M
nI�
V
o
n
n Of
,,Q
NI
NiM
d
M.Ai
yl
M..NjVI
n
O
Mi0
N
M�.n
W
Q
Cl•rl
Q'.
nliN
OOj
Ol n.N
n
O
b
O
ei
ei
�y
N'
N�
i
M
N
Niti
N
a
M
n-
'i
N
ei
ei'
Q
N
N
e4'
M
N
'i flb
N
N
rl
V
X
W
b
.i
.y
Vl
M
Of
N
vl
lO
O
b
lO
Of
N
ul
Yl
Of
O
vl
vl
00
'
O
N
v0 l
0
i
O
O
Ow
O
O
O
O
i
W
O
O
O
O
4i4
4
w
OIO
9
O
p
nl
W
w
d
1D
Q
Q
O
n
Q
M
N
N
Ol
N
O
CO
O
N
N
M
eii
V1
W
n
W
fi
ww
M
w
O
W
q
w
O
w
(O
X
.4i'1
N
.-I
Ojn
Ol
OQ�N
b
.ij
lOaO
N
Opp
OI
O
1�'
VIIQ
vl
ri
n V)
Q
Q
M'
Ol
e1
N
N
N
e4
e4I
Ol
d
M
l6
i
N
N
A
4
N
er
ei
Q
N
N rl
, Vl
�y
N
e4
Z
l
N
n
0
0
0
F
N
M
>
O
M
O
d
M
O
M
N
C
O
O
O
N
O
M
a
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
a
d0
0
I
D
c
0
V
U
IA
o'
EI
f
x
x
x
C 'E
E
o
o
C'x
, o
E
'20
E
`�w
c F
01-
C . .
'
F�
w
i l
' a
T
� m
o
Zo
ti
a
a
a
O
C «
0 0
c
0
0 O
C C a
O
U
ax
OO
aEx
O
.O
N
O O
N
Nj >
o. .W E `o
W V _ W U.
Ei E.
W, W,U
o`
E E o
W W'U
E£ `o
W U,
£ £ oIE
IW WTI
jW W U
0
0
0
0
O
w
w
w
+
w
w
+ +
+ +
j
m
v
v
o
vbi,
m
�
W
1�
N
CO
O
e'1
'i
t0
N
9
Y
a
a
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
l7
+
+
+
+
+
C9
u
O
O
O
O
O
O
p
O
O
N
X
+
0
W
W
W
000
W
000+
O
o
0
0
Q
0
0
Q
Q
g
Q
g
W
W
mWIq
oo
W
W
m
W
n
n
+
W
M
W
N
W
a00
'h
W
O
+
W
M
W
..
T
W
W
4
T
W
OJ
ei
e1
e1
N
N
ei
YI
t0
O
O
I�
'I
M
N
1�
O
O
O
O
+
R
R
[t
T
O
r
O
W
WWW
Ol
N
Ol
OI
aWD
OIW
-W
tO
WOO
V1 h V
y�WWW
Of
O
Ob
O
w
IL LL,
WWWW
b
aW0
O
N
O
i
i VI
A
A
O
rl
N N M
teD
i
X
O
0
bst
9
4 NN
' O O
'Ovt
' O O O
O
Q
Q
O O
O
0
0 0 0
O
g
'Q
-
vO l
4 VI
,
Q
I
W
Ol
VI
N
b C
u1 t0.
M
vt N e-I
C N N
p�
O
1�
b
O
q
, y b M
W
M
W
R
W
CO
2
b
W
O
W
O
W
M
W
N
x
N.N
ei
Lid
N.Li
�'N
O
h
M 'i W
N
1�
N
n
l0
^
VI
O
ZM
1�
rl
eii rj
M.
^
fi
(V
N
f
F
7
a
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
`a
n
F
J1
b
N
ei
l0
O
r
m
T
G
O'
O,
N'
C
R:
N
I
H'
a 'El
E
c
"
o E c"
o..c
NI
c
E
El
�, c
x
E
_x
E c'
a
x
N c
x
2..E c
n'
p
CFIE
F�E
Q
c
s
c'F
F'iE
FEE
N..c °.E
O
o
a
i o v
0
o
v
O
o,
a
�c
o v
c
c
o a
° o F'. w
w.
a
ZF?a
l0
wa
rc
a0
rc
9
^m n W
F s c
a
z
1
rc
9
a qI0
a
OI
adm mW
o o:
ae�
°O' a
a
`o
EEO
E E `O
E
E`oE�E_`o
E E`oEE
'o
IE E`o
W U
W
W
U
W W
U
W U
-W W V
WLW_ UI
�I
o
0
T
w
w
T
m
m
O
m
LL
M
M
V
N
O
T
d
Y
N
O
O
O
O
O
O
N
lJl
d
w
w
w
w
d
O
O
O
O
b
ry
IL
O
O
O
O
W
b
O
O
LL
W
N
O
M
M
n
N
M;M
4°
l0
N
MM
b
O
M,
999
M.M
O
O
y
4
y
O
n
O
9
N
O
M.M
O
i
1D
0±
W
W
W
W
W
O
W
O
W
b
I W
W
W
Ol
O
N
W
OI,
WIW
Win
t0
e9
W
N
O
1912
Ol
n
N d
m
Npl
N
M
M
nM
yl
Olin
N
Ol
rvi0
N
y
N
ei
M
b
ni
VAN
O m
V
N'
e-I
Ol
V
'i'
N
Of
Vl
ei
ei
e1
N
N
N'
W
l0
lD
lD
ei
ri
N.
fV'.
T
V
W
ti
W
M.M
4
W
n
�
N
w
M
W
M
b
O N
C?
W
W
W
+
^
M
o
W
O O
9
9
O
0
9
9
F
~
N
T
N
M
W
o
N
W
W
W (O O
n
I
b
b
f
N
n
N
M
M
m
ll
O
n
C4
N
p
CN O
I ei
.OM
N
N
O
O
N
14
M
V
ei
ei
Ol
W
ei
ei
N
U
X
0
4
YI
9
Of
4
O
°
vl
4°
vl
CO
4
'i
4
lA
4
N
4
w
4
N
°
m
4
vl
4
O
7
.i
4
N
4
V
419
m
O
vl
vl
4
w
4
a
~i
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
w°
W
W
W
Ol
eel
N
O
Vi
n
Ol
M
V
OlIri
W
M
Ol
Ol
n
M
O
O
e1
o
O
m
a?
,�
A
b
m
In
ao
n
.�
'i
i
n
N
r
m
m
.�
-i
.+
o
q
m
m
cl
m
.+
m
(]
Z
O
N'
'I
%
y
ei
fl
W
Vl
ei'
ei
rl
lV
e'1
lA
ei
ei
rl
i (V
e.j
N
N
N
tll
m
o
O
o
O
m
o
~
N
N
b
O)
f
M
W
O
M
M
n
O
O
O
N
O
N
�
a
O
O
O
O
O
O
`a
n
m
r
m
m
n
r
m
O
^
ry
e
M
o
N
N
V
C
�
�
b
N
N
�
q
Cl!
U
«
c
m
N
U
E x
E�Ex
M
E HI x
Ex
x
E H x
LLU
E
N of
I o f
C f.
V
CiF
c
C'F
_ o C '.. a
o v'
o d
la
W
K1�
m
Si Ala
� � a
.2.2
d
N N E
�',w.
F
NN a
N'�n fw
a
o° w
E .W `aE
`oEi
E `o
E E of
.EI oIEw
`o
N i
w U
w. ,U
w'. w'.V
w w U.
w'W;V
U,
I ii
m
I
m
n
N
ry
N
OI
a
N
m
�
ry
m
Mti
vrvi
N
S
pmj
�'
LL
°
a N
I
o
m
n
w.
pn
a
ti
�p
im N
p
O
O
N
O
N
Obi
LL
F
M
°1
Mn
9.4
m
°
gi4
Q
Q 4
ry
°
gg
Q,N
M
o
M
m
o°fo;R
m
Q
o
N
ry
o
g
Q.m
ry
°+
Q
a
b
p+
f, _
+
w
wlww
w
w
w
w
YIR'o
w
w
w
w
m
N,w
Nlry
W
�+
w
q
w
+
w919
44
°
>
n
o
ml
o
m
p
m
m
b
m.ry
m
m
ro
N
m
n
rwi
.a�M'Q
r
a
awolvwi
N W
cu
Q
N
O
M
m
N
9ry+
N
r
O b
N
O
b O
V
wW1wW
w
WW
W
RnQ
RNa
I
NO
M
ll0
M
CAO '1
Q
N
N
M
Of
1l1
m
0
N
-YN
N
%
M
1Q �'1
ei
OO
Ol
rt
ei
rl
O
01
IV
Q
O
O
b
rl
ci
W
N
'i
W
h
M
N
V
f�l
fV
p1W
w
w
w
w
w
W
0999
+
N
m
O
09,91
+
b
b
' w
O
N
O
O
Wm
9
R
b
O
b
R
M
R
N
m
M
w w
b O
ry b
w
w
w
p
Q
W
W
W
N
o:
w
e
w
m
w
W
N
W
O
m
w
O
O
m
m
.
b'N
-Q
O1
N
N
OI
n
'il
r
N
i
Q
N
o
~
n
o
u°i
vrvi
Lq
>
I
N
Q
a
Q,
r
b
O
O
6
Q
m
b
n
Iq
>
ry
m
n
o
N
m
N
m
N
ry
OJ
ei
O
b
ei
N
b
°
3I
c;
N!
'E
a
'm
—y
d. E
m \'
IE
El
\
_.
E.»
%
E. .x
E x
S
EI»
x
E x
LL
N. o f
N' oiE
N ci
E
c.'E
N c£
c
E
cE
�.G
�'�IC
.FO.. �,�
i1_O-
N
Vi
O
3
m
N 10 W
A' N
O: K
4
N N��
O:Iv
R' N W
C
NI NIA
K
KIK
a
Q. y'O
N
cl a ,O
col co
c
.O
a
c
V
t
u
u?iYi
G gii
C cu
olo
«y
o
o.«
oN a
U
'LI
ry
N'N
y� N
N>
W W
J
W W
°J
W W
OJ
W W
W W
Q
U
V
U
V
V
W
WU
c
G
W W U
om
T
m
m
O
ry
a
m
m
°
m
N
ry
M
N
LLm
N
N
n
T
N
Vml
O
l�Yl
O
N
Y
-
N
W
T
ry
h
N
h
O1
jp d
O
O
.i
N
O LL
�
N
l0
W
00
V
n
N
O
LL
a
V
d
b
N
h
O
m
m
w
R
O W
R
R
R
O
O
O
O
O
O
9
O
O
l
W
b
W {h
O
W n
ch
p
O
M
W
n
'etiiI
W
N
'
W
W
me
W
Ill
T
W
lfO
N
CN
O
N
N
ey
(O
V
l
V
lO
n
'1
V
rl
1
OCl
�I Ill
V
W
T
6
X
M
0
mw
o
a
n
Ow
m
mw
m
0
4
°
4
4
4
°w
°
°
+
°
4
4
4
9
~N
mn
�
m
ry
w
w
w
w
e
m
w
w
w
�
l
oVf
m
m
IOe n
b
In
m
g
o
In
y
n
m
m ry
v
n
o ,y
ry m
o N
n m
.a+ o
O
M
1il0
I
n
n
f
O]
N
Iw lj
lV
14
'1
n
O
VI
lV
(V
4
m
ei
N
b
Vl
rl
rl
M
M
V
X
W
O
b
O
O
b
b
b
OW
bW
.
'°°
b
O
O
°
W
°
4
4
4
4
a
4
°
9
4
4
4
9
4
4
942I"
°
O
m
W
O
O
W
I O
W
W
W Ob
W n
m
W T
W
O1b
W
b
W eOi
W Y1
4W
O
W n
b
W
M
Ol
O
N
Yl
ei
m
tN
O
Ol
N
b
d'
M
ei
ei
T
N
Ol
%b
Ol
M
N
b
N
l
M
s}
N
b
Z
W
N
vl
eq
r
paj
O
�
O
N
M
n
F-
�
O
N
O
O
a
`w
6
O
H
M
V
b
N
m
ti
ry
M
N
Yl
�
M
N
l0
O
VI
Iv1
N
N
C
�I
ry
0
6�
N
b
10
N
a
q
�
N
U
N
.E.
v
E x
E.; x
E �I
.
E NI
LL
a E.
o.E
N�' o
f
N o
f
O'�
o~
�
a
� a
� v I
a
F� 2
F
F
F
1
12
AA
'a
a
t
C
«
U
W
O O
O O
0 0«
°
0
O O
O O «
O
N N
2
N .V
Na
CN
V
d
Q
E `O
°O
E E.
o
m
EE
`oE
w of
m E E `o m
F E_ `o
m
O
I-
N
N
O
W
W
N
T
N
b
01
O
t+N'1
N
I�
yl
b
N
N
tnD
M
b
W
W
LL
b
M
m
ci
p
Lr?
N
h
b
r
O
O
a
s
—
m
m
I
W
O
o
O
O
O
O
O
[7
�
LL
O
O
N
X LL
999
°0
9
9
0
0
00
4
°
°j4iR
°
4
4.4
0
0
0
1p
m
M
m
..
M
I...
y
O
W
N
W
WSW
e^iO
W
W
W
N;OiO
WW
ry
WIW1W
N�'�jN
W
N
W
lfl
W
W
'1
W
W
NCO
W
W
M
9999
W
m
tiil�
W
O
W
T
W
n
NI
�rvi
i.N
vmf
M
H
O
b
n
O
a0
b
N
6
X
~
p p w
?999
.W
0+0122
M
M
N
N
°O
M
m
4
n
4
N
°
T
R
T
4
b
R
N
-+-L29
p
F
m
W
W
W
W
O
W
W
O
w
9
9
9
9
M
R
O
N
m
. e
p
M
V
A
A
V
e
e
I
A
e4
O
n
ei
X
W
0 0 ~ r
O M
W
W
R
W
W 01
N
b
b
OI
N
b
b
fl
1p
b
M
a
W
b
N
y
b
w LL LL
�O M
N
M
ei
10
N
COI
O
b
ei
ei
O
lD
ei
O1
YI
V
n
O
O
b
O
l0
O
M
mm
W
X
m M
M
m
N
Y1
lT
O
1�
O
N
M
!O
N
ry
b
M
ei
V
n
Yf
O
Ot
IT
li
b
N
M
V
N N ei
ei
N
rl
N
N
O
M
rl
b
rl
e1:
ei
a}
M
M
N
N
ei
ei
ei
M
N
N'1�
n
N
z
H
H
O
o
0
0
0
0
0
d
a
o'
Lq
n
m
m
m
.mi
e
0
O c
v
v
N
a
O
n
M
W
N
N
V
U
m
m
'
iN
dl
E
al
v
L
E
E
=I E
°1
E!
w'
E
N
N
o_£
�cF
Vc
0
I«
c 0
c 0
cF
co
N
2' K
Y.
Ka
a
��
O O
[[
0
I—E
O Opv
E'`o
�o
E! E `o
w
E `o
W
V
r
W
W
u°
tD
F
W
W
V
f
W W V
f
E
W W U
L
W
W'
V
f
W
N
I
b
N
VQ1
O
N
�
Vl
b
N
Ol
CO
O
N
LL
b
Ol
�y
T
VI
Y
n
CCNN
q
yl
Q
b
N
O
O
O
O
O
O
0
LL
N
O
n
O
N
U
W U
T
y
N
O
T,TIn
O
O
m
T
M
b
O
N
O
M
O
M
n
N
M
T
t0
N
m
N
O M
m
O
9
9
RO
W
R
R
R
W
R
R
R
R
R
R
D
W
W
M
N
m
m
W
W
i
W
b
b
W
M
W
b
W
N
M
b
Y
W
pOL
I0+
b
w
W
N"
W
b
w
M
r"
b
4
r4
4
4
b
4
e4
T
U q
6
I'4
W
H
of
O O
'4
O
M
M
n
O
O
M
M
O
y
ti
O
a
p
b
O
O
T
O
T
O
n
O
N
O
T
O
T
O
l0
O
'4
O
M
O
m
O
n
O
N
O
T
T
0
W
WWW
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
N
Q
pJ
Vl
T
M
N
M
b
y
O
p
M
N
N
n
LO
p
N
m
r,0
n
n
N
rl
N
M
m
m
n
y
N
'-I
N
m
O
a
W
m
n
'4
N
M
O
p
aN
y
q
m
a
O
Vl
y
Q
fl
ei
e4
M
M
ei
ei
1l1
b
n
n
e1
N
ei
.4
V
M
N
N
b
N
N
A
V
m
N
e4
U
w
�D nl
N
b l 0 m
m
W
N
b
b
O
lW0
b
O
O
O
O O O
-
2
2
1 r
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
2
9
9
9
O
O
R
N
g
O
O
F
W W
W
W
W
W
Y!
W
W
W
W
I
K
N Q
Q O
fQ/1
M
N
O
M�
b
m
y
b
b
N
b
'4
y
y
ei
W
p
m
.4
V
T
e1
N
m
e4
ei
m
m
v1.
I!1
N
b
T
O
m
N
n
n
V
b
Q Q e4.
m
N'
N
'4
rl
r1-
rl
N
n
b
l0'
'1
b
M
M'
'1
M
of
of
n
VI
c4
Z-4
I
N
n
i
^
�
m
T
N
N
O
O
T
N
n
c
v
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
`v
6
c
n
N
C
O
ry
U
«
m
y
I
E
E
E
E
a',
U
N- x
E
N
x
E x!
x
E x
c
E' Nix
„
a LL
O O
I E
N
O
O
E
E
E
c
C
C
C O
~
Z
d
o
o .
o
o
'
Y
mIw
m
m
0
ro n',.0.
d N w0.
6'
ti S
O
m m w
N m
O
C d
V
C
C«
C C, d
16'
C C«
C C «
L C C «. 6
C C«
O
C C
.22
d
-
o O. ✓
0 0
1
0 O
_� O 0 _s
o 0
O
o 0
._
'^ N' d
ins ,'^-
m..N
Q
G
V U
Z
Z
o d
E o
b
E�
E.
o
b;
E w o
F
�b wE `o
n
ww `o
n ww o ^
wEo
n
EE
{-i,W
U
1- __ U
H
U.
F- U H_
_U
F-
W'W
¶== 뾓ꚟ p 禀 ६ 閈䚫봩ᇤ뎀৩庶쨬ጸ ᖨ ᛀ ᒐ ፨ 뙐 ᓀ ᗘ ᛰ 또 또 또
汅䙦汩e . က 釚뗲
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ﴈ\Device\Tcpip_{723E2921-93C3-4B71-B07F-5EF69EE7AE71} \Device\Tcpip_{C7568B63-C424-48B3-AB9B-6D1F004D5AFC} \Device\Tcpip6_{DF90D91A-87BB-4594-BB0D-9CF5D781BB2D} \Device\Tcpip6_{96DB35F7-68D4-44C1-AE2A-D30D5CED7C3C} \Device\Tcpip6_{723E2921-93C3-4B71-B07F-5EF69EE7AE71} \Device\Tcpip6_{C7568B63-C424-48B3-AB9B-6D1F004D5AFC} Device\Tcpip6_{C7568B63-C424-48B3-AB9B-6D1F004D5AFC} ﾨ歮 뤙ᒭ쌿ǐ 褨 L⾠ D5 〰䄰5Bﾈ歮 뤙ᒭ쌿ǐ 셠 뮨 ⾠ & ㍻㘴昴愷ⴴ㐲㐴㐭戰ⴱ㠹愰攭㤰㌰扣搶ㄹ紲䈲桬픰댲ꕰ/ڲ쎀麌閛쇀鐋ꒈ㊵츪 迸/ﾨ歮 뤙ᒭ쌿ǐ 픰 ⿸L⾠ ⴴ㔷 〰䄰㈸㙥8 CreateSession 敄楶散湉瑳湡散 ￨桬밐有䫮꓀ꑄﾀ歮 朖䁺儶ǐ �R ਈ�R * 䐸䍅䄰ㅆ〭㐳ⴱ戴㌹㠭䌵ⵄ㈷〶䌶䐲㥆䌴㜭ⵐ㐲 ｨﳶ㦫ﾹ潋笜檬ﻴџ欝↳勍㗬巕홀暝ﱒ쯣䛐ኢੵ鲮慭夑鉡頽䫓푙伮蕘Ɋ쨯軘褎酥�耭큅衈䈕�ᨒ쟘᭣斵蹬⅓Ꭓ䅦㶨ᾄ叐䴷헒魐⌍銗박萭叭揬肳䑭廒ꃯ娍 ﾈ歮 䉧儶ǐ 줨 & ㅻ㝦㜷㤳ⴴ戰㈴ㄭ攱ⴳ〸摡㠭㘰㙥㙦㙥㘹紳 ﾈ歮 㰡巫ᚏǑ 䏀 㶘� 0 & 㡻愵㔸昳ⴰ㑦㕡㐭㤷ⴵ昸㥥㘭慤攲ㄱ㈹搰紴 ﹘歳 㵐䐘 Ɛ 谄Ÿ Ƅ Ť ሀȁ Ԁ ȡ ሀ?ȁ Ԁ Ƞ ሀ?ā Ԁ ሀā Ԁ ሀā Ԁ ሀā Ԁ ሀ ȁ Ԁ Ȭ ሀ( ԀP ꡇ㌺潙㑲ọ㍶忶䑆涺蹟ሀȁ ༀ ᨀ 耀ȁ Ԁ ȡ ᨀ ကȁ Ԁ Ƞ ᨀ ကā Ԁ က?ā Ԁ ᨀ ကā ̀ ᨀ 耀ȁ ༀ ā Ԁ ā Ԁ 歶
耀튦嘸 慌瑳牐扯呥浩e 歶耀 敎睴牯偫牥潦浲䡳橩捡楫杮ﾨ歮 톾鵱儶ǐ 茠 ꔈ 薘 坓D ﾠ歮 Ჽ�皥ǐ � 쏨 薘* 偉呟乕䕎彌䉖单 ﾘ歮 䖠儶ǐ �
ꊈ薘 偉呟乕䕎彌䕄䥖䕃剟住T ﾠ歮 ࣒爵儸ǐ � ᯠ ⼨ L
牐灯牥楴獥 ﾈ歮 䖠儶ǐ � ꆈ 銨 & 㡻搳㙡㈳ⴶ㜹㙡㐭㠰ⴸ㐹㌵愭㤱㌲㕦㌷㉢紹 ﾨ歮 थ䍈儶ǐ � ਰ銨 〰䄰 ￨歶 � ￠HTREE\ROOT\0 ﾨ歮 䌛�嚈ǐ � 癠銨 〰㘶 ￨歶 鴐 &￨歶 ﾈ歮 थ䍈儶ǐ � 銨 & 㡻㐰㜹〱ⴰ挸㌷㐭戸ⴹ慡㥤挭㍥㜸ㅥ挹㘵絥 耀ꎌ铅dž⅄&婰ﾨ歮 थ䍈儶ǐ � 迸銨 〰㘰 ￨歶 耀 歶 耀ð 慃慰楢楬楴獥 歶 耀 潃普杩汆条s 耀ꎌ铅dž飀歶 N � 潃瑮楡敮䥲D ﾨ{00000000-0000-0000-ffff-ffffffffffff} 歶( 耀 坓屄偉呟乕䕎彌䉖单䥜彐啔乎䱅䑟噅䍉彅佒呏歶
錈 慈摲慷敲䑉 桬ꀠⅇ&
Construction Emissions (Los Gatos as a Percent of the County of Santa Clara) - Offroad Year 2008.
populatio
pativM
consurni
CY Equipment
Fuel
.-Hp Class
MY
n
1Xameaddl)
CO2 Erlumli
N20 EaM1musi
CN4 Exhaust
CO2e
CO2e
Na OD- Highway ".cm.
O
120
..am. and Rmng Equipment
1971
0
0
0
1,78E05
000E -W
7 W 09
119E -05
0
2008 Off Traclas
O
120
Cwndami and Wang Equipment
1970
0
0
0
154E 45
0Wi
650E -09
155E-05
0
2WB OH- Higtmay Tragws
D
120
CmSXUCtim and Wining EWipmenl
1959
0
0
0
1,41E -05
0 W
6.IOE49
144E4k5
0
2000 OH- HiOmay Tractwa
D
120
Cantruc9m and Minng EWipmenl
1960
0
0
0
129E -05
0WE•W
552E -09
330E-05
0
2008 00-Higway Traders
D
120
CmShuction and Mining Equipment
1967
0
0
0
1.19E -05
000E -CO
5.00E W
1.201E.0
0
act OHJiffmi Traders
D
In
Construction and Mining Egnpmml
1956
0
0
0
1.11E -05
000E-2C0
4.76E-09
1.12E -05
0
2008 OH- 14ghwry Tmdws
D
120
Cmsbuctmn and Miring Epvpmenl
ISM
0
0
0
1ME 05
0.00E-00
4.47E09
1.05E-05
0
2000 OI6Highway Traders
D
120
Commuman and Mining Egdpmml
IWA
0
0
0
901E 00
0Wi
4.19E-09
990E
0
2000 Off Highway TmOmO
D
120
CmWuetim and Mining Egngnent
1963
0
0
0
Of BEN
OWEr00
391
926E-06
0
2008 Olfkglmay Tmdws
D
120
Consbudiat and Mining Edummenl
HOW
0
0
0
85411
000E -00
365E 09
861E -05
0
SON OffH9hwayTaxi
D
120
Cmmmulon and Mining Equipment
1561
0
0
0
7.ME-06
000E-00
337E 09
79Mi
0
2008 Off gran, Tradom
D
120
Cammunmm and Mining Equipment
1960
a
0
0
725EC6
O.WE -W
3f0E09
7.31E-03
0
208 OXA4gMay Tractors
O
120
CmshucOm and Mining Equipment
1959
0
0
0
664E-06
0WE•W
284E -09
670E-06
0
2008 OX HgImay Traders
O
120
consbuNm and Mining Equipment
1958
0
0
0
6.07E-06
O.WEW
259E 09
6.12Et6
0
Mad OX-Highway Traders
O
120
Camummim and Mining Equipment
1957
0
0
0
553E-06
0Di
2MEA9
558E-06
0
2000 OXJgglmay Tatters
D
120
ComWCtim and Mining Emnpmml
1956
0
0
0
501E-06
OWE-00
2. t4E 09
505606
0
2008 OX.H,tmmy Traders
D
120
Cammumnot and Mining Equipment
1955
0
0
0
1WE06
000E -W
192EA9
4.54E-06
0
age OXJfidmay Tractors
D
120
Cwstructmn and Mining Effnpmml
1954
0
0
0
399E-06
000E-00
I20E -09
4.02E-06
0
200 Off-HigMny Tragws
D
120
CanSbuclion and Miming Equipment
1953
0
0
0
347E
0Wi
148E 09
3.501
0
200 OPoK¢xiy Traders
D
120
Cmshuctim and Mining Egtlpmait
1952
0
0
0
296E-05
0WE-W
127E -09
2Wi
0
2008 OH - Highway Tragws
D
120
Cmsbuedm and Mining Equipment
1951
0
0
0
245E'W
0 W
105E 09
247E{
0
2008 OXJO,hway Tudors
D
120
CmsNxlim and Mining EWTment
19M
0
0
0
191
000E -00
824610
1.946475
0
2008 OXltighwry Traders
D
120
Cmsbuctm and Mean, Equipment
1949
0
0
0
1.39EL6
D.WEW
596E -10
141E4103
0
2008 Off KgMay TSadom
0
120
Canshudim and Inning Equipment
1940
a
0
0
8 7911
0 iti
3 76E 10
8.81
0
2008 Off Hamany Tractors
0
120
Cmuhuctim and Mining Equipment
1947
0
0
0
432E07
0Di
185E -10
4ME 47
0
208 OH- Higlmay Tmdws
O
175
Cwnhuc. and Mining Equipment
2008
2N
Ila
Is.
7.36E -01
0 .WE -00
I 95 05
736E-01
244
208 OH.Hghway Traders
D
175
Cmstandi and Mining Equipment
2007
261
10.87
64.37
708E -01
OWE-W
239E-05
7AM41
235
2008 OffAighwry Tmgwa
D
175
CmsWCtian and Miming Equipment
2006
256
1043
6107
6.60E01
0,001
361
Bd1E-01
225
2008 Off- Higlruny Traders
D
175
Cmsbution and Mining Equipment
2005
2.5
10.01
59AI
6.52E -01
000E -00
391
6.53E -01
216
2008 OHiHigIm-ay Traslas
D
175
CmCmcticn and Ii Equipment
2004
245
96
9.05
Sae6ol
000E-00
4,97E05
827E 41
200
2008 Ortaglmay Tmdws
D
175
Construction and Miami Equipment
2003
24
921
54.81
600601
0Wi
661E -05
602E 41
199
SON OX�HiglnvyTladws
0
175
Cwsbuadw and Mining EWipmml
SON
235
884
52.62
5,76E01
0 W
1.10E -04
5.70E 41
191
ads OH -Hgmi Tmdws
D
175
Construction and Miring EWipmml
2001
221
814
4869
531 E01
0WE-W
100E -04
533E41
176
2008 Off Tradda
D
175
Cmsbuctm and Mining Equipment
2000
243
873
521
5 B
D.WE -W
L15EM
521E-01
189
2008 OX.H,hway Tractors
0
175
Commudon and Mining Equipment
1999
236
829
4956
540E -01
OCOE -W
I09E04
5426.01
180
2008 OXAOOmxay Traders
D
175
CmWUCtim and Mining Equipment
1998
2a
700
47.02
5.12E -01
000E-00
104E-0d
514E 411
170
2000 Off Hatmsy Tmdws
O
175
communion and Mining Equipment
1997
222
743
4444
4 E.1
001
9aE05
186E -01
161
2000 OXfHgMay Tmdors
D
175
Constrution and Mining Equipment
19%
214
7
4167
156E -0I
000E -00
922E 05
450E -01
152
208 Off Intimater Taut.
D
175
Canslrucdm and Mining Equipment
1995
200
659
3938
429E -01
0001
867E 05
131E -01
143
2008 OH-Hghway Traders
D
175
Cammuc9m and Mining Equipment
ISM
BOB
631
3773
411E -01
0Mi
831E 05
4.13E -01
137
2008 OX- Higlmay Tades
D
115
Cmmu.n. and Mining Egopmenl
1993
2
606
3635
3956.01
0.00600
800E 05
390E 01
132
2WO 0$.,., Traders
D
175
Construction and Mining Equipment
1992
201
5g2
3538
381
0WE-W
779E -05
381
128
2008 OX - Highway Trxlm
D
375
Cmsbudim and Mining EWipmenl
1991
2
575
NA
315E -01
0 M
79E -OS
316E -01
125
not 06Hytway Tadom
D
175
Ccmtruction and Mining Equipment
1900
2
550
3339
364E411
000E -00
73N.S
3.65E -01
121
2000 OHAigMny Tractors
D
175
CmzOUdien and Mining Equipment
1989
1.88
500
30.4
331 EL1
0 G
669E-05
333E -01
to
20080X4gyw.a11niaem
D
175
Ccnshudim and Mimng Equipment
ION
115
461
2757
3WE 41
000E -W
6.07E 05
3.02E -01
100
2000 Off tiyrvrvrey Traders
D
175
CmsOUctim and Mining Equipment
1987
1.63
416
25.1
271E-0I
000E-00
709E -05
273E -01
90
SON OH Higlmay Tmdws
O
175
Camuten and Mining Equipment
19%
152
376
22 ad
245E -01
OWE-00
640E 05
2.46E -01
82
2008 OOH,heay Tmdou
D
175
CandaucTm and Mining Equipment
1985
1.41
336
2025
2.19E -0I
OWE-OD
572E 05
210E 41
73
2008 Off Kutner, Tmdws
D
I75
Cansbudma a Sumng Equipment
1961
139
32
19-01
209 1
000EW
582E 05
SAN 01
69
2008 OX.H,hway Traders
D
475
CmstrucOm and Mining EWipmml
1903
135
3
12.11
195E -01
000E -00
546E -05
197601
65
2008 OXAighway Tmdws
D
175
Con... and Mining Equipment
1982
13
278
160
161 E01
0 M
500E -05
Id2E -01
60
twat DX- H,hway Tragws
D
175
Cmstruman and Mining Equipment
1981
127
263
1585
111E -01
0Wi
470E45
112601
9
2008 OX Hiaten, Tragws
D
175
Construction and Minn, Equipment
1980
123
2"
1471
159EA1
0 M
443E-05
160601
53
2W90tt- Hyrvrvrey iradas
D
175
Cm50udim and Mining Equipment
1979
100
200
1239
I.NE01
0WE00
397E-05
131E -01
45
age OHAig4wyTtadws
0
175
Cmstri and Mining Equipment
1978
BOB
17
Ida
1IIE -01
001
3.28E 05
1.11E -01
37
2008 OPoH,hway Tragws
D
175
C -amuNm and Mining Equipment
1977
079
I'm
832
897E -02
000E-00
2 66E 05
9.021
JO
2008 Orth mxy Traders
0
175
Cmabuc0m and Mining Equipmml
1975
066
115
694
749E -02
OWE-00
2.22E 05
7.53E-02
25
2008 Of- Hlglte-y Tmdws
D
175
CanshusOm and Mning Equipment
1975
eu
095
573
6.18E -02
000600
193E-05
622E -02
21
2008 OHAiglmay Tractors
O
175
Cmsbuctm and Wining Equipment
1974
045
078
4.69
500E -02
0.00E+00
150E 05
500E-02
17
2008 Off Highway Tad-
0
175
Commudion and Mining Equipment
1973
037
064
307
417E -02
0 1
114E-05
4201
14
200 OH�HigimmyTratlws
O
175
Cmstrudm and Mining Equipment
1972
0.31
0.51
3.26
351E -02
0Mi
104E 05
353E-02
12
2000 Off Tragws
D
175
Cam.d. and Mining Equipment
1971
027
046
291
302E -02
OWE-W
9.88606
3oMM
10
ads Traders
D
175
Censtrneman and Mining Equipment
I970
023
04
243
262602
0Di
8MES6
264E -02
9
2008 Off Tmdws
D
175
Cmsbuctm and Mining Equipment
1969
021
0.37
2.26
243E 02
0 D
952E-06
245E -02
8
208 OX Higheiay Tragws
D
175
Cmstrudon and Mining Equipment
INS
BAB
ON
205
220E-02
000E -W
862E-06
2.22E@
7
2008 OH�Hghyay Trades
D
175
Cmsbuman and Miring Equipmml
1967
038
D.T
159
2WE02
000E -W
791
204E 42
7
2008 OX- HgM.ay Tmdws
D
175
communion and Mining Equipment
1966
017
029
176
199E -02
O.WE -W
742E 'W
391E412
6
2008 Trades
D
175
Constudim and Mining Equipment
INS
016
027
165
110E -02
000E-00
697EW
119602
6
200 Off -Hiari Taws
D
175
Cmsbuctm and Mining EWipmml
1951
ell
026
155
I67E02
0.001
6MEW
163E -02
6
2008 OH- Hghway Ttadws
D
175
Conalmdon and Mn., EWipmml
1963
014
024
145
ISME02
0Wi
612E DO
157E-02
5
200 OffN,fty Tractors
0
175
CmsbuNm and Mining Equipment
t962
0.13
022
135
145E -02
000E-00
569606
1ASE 412
5
208 Off - Higtm-y Trani
O
175
Cotnhucdm and Mang Equipment
1961
0.12
o11
325
1]4E 02
0 .WE -00
5.26E 06
135E -02
4
2008 O(fHiymay Ttadws
0
175
ConstruNm and Mang Equipment
INS
0.11
0.19
1.15
1 23E 02
0WE-00
484E-06
1.24E 42
4
2008 Off - HitrayTuMma
O
175
Cmsbuctim and Mining Equipment
1959
01
0.17
195
113E 02
O.WE -W
4 43 W
1.14E -02
4
200806Hiymay Tragws
0
175
Construdon and Mining Equignent
1950
009
0.16
ON
103E -02
0Wii
405E -N
I.WE 42
3
2008 OH�Higlmzy Tractors
D
175
Consbudim and Mning Equipment
1957
ON
0J4
0.68
94GIE 3
0 .WE-00
369E-06
9401
3
age Off Ttadws
D
175
Cansimi and Mumng Equipment
19%
D.08
013
079
852E 03
000EW
3NEW
8.59E -03
3
act OIG1110,ay Tmclws
D
175
Construction and Mmm, Equipment
1955
0.07
0.12
071
765E -03
0001
3WEW
772E -03
3
act OH-Hl,hway Tmdors
D
175
Cmstructim and Mining EWipmenl
19N
ON
of
063
670E -03
0001
266E -.
6.81E43
2
act Off Traders
D
175
Cmsbuctm and Mining Equipment
1953
0115
009
0.55
591E,03
000E-00
232EW
596E -03
2
2008 OHfHghway Traders
D
175
Cmstrustim and Mining EWipmenl
1952
0.04
000
047
503E -03
OWi
197E-06
508E ,03
2
2008 OH- Hghway Tractors
D
175
CmsWCtim and Mining Equipment
1951
000
ON
039
4.16E4O
000E-00
163EL6
410E -03
t
0WB Off 6,maa, Tragws
D
175
Cornammm and l.Bning Equipment
INS
003
000
031
328E -03
0Di
129EW
331E -03
I
2008 OX -H,May Tramaa
D
175
Constuctm and Mining Equipment
INS
0.02
OW
022
237E -03
0Di
930E-07
2.39E -03
1
2000 Off Tragws
0
175
Communion and Mining Equipment
1948
001
002
0.14
150E -03
O.WE -W
587E -07
1.51E -03
0
2008 OH- Highway Tmdws
0
175
Construction and Mimi Equipment
1947
0.01
001
007
735EM
000E -00
2.28607
)AHEM
0
2008 Off-Hghem, Traders
O
250
Cmisbudan and Miming Equipment
20W
252
1067
6206
6.95E 01
0WE00
1ME 05
698E -01
2M
208 OX- Higlmmy Tmdws
D
250
Cammucto and Mining Equipment
2007
247
1027
6052
669E -01
000680
226E 05
6701
222
NM 00.Yighway Ttadcts
D
250
Cmstrudon and Mining EWipmml
2006
242
9.M
58.14
641601
0Wi
201E -05
61
213
age Off Hi,Imay Tadma
O
250
Carstrucdo and Mining Equipment
2005
237
946
5582
6.17E -01
OWE-00
311605
8.17E4n
204
2W8 OX Hiyroy Tmdws
D
250
Cutstrumon and Mining Equipment
2004
2.32
9.00
53%
591E 01
0001
351 E05
5WE -01
I%
2000 OX- Hiytwey Tmdws
D
250
Cammm o and Mning Eqummmt
203
227
871
5141
567E 4DI
D.WE-W
406E-05
560EL1
In
SON OXNighi Tmdws
D
250
Cmmndon aM Mining Equipment
2002
222
836
a939
544E-01
0WE -W
4.90EM
SAN41
I8i
2000 OH Hgiway Tradam
D
250
Caustrumm and Mining Equipment
20I
2.00
71
4551
5.02E -01
000E-00
470505
503E -01
IN
2009 Off HgMay Tmdwa
O
250
Coshumm and Miming Equipment
add
2a
025
4879
530E -0I
OWEW
5.I HE 05
5.39E -01
178
2008 D.-i-no ay Tmdm
0
250
Constutim and Mining Equipment
INS
223
784
4632
5.10E 41
000E -0D
4 SSE 05
511E 41
IN
2000 Off Tradad
0
250
Canswcto and Mining EWipmenl
1993
216
743
4394
4 NE01
0 .00EW
4 60E 05
CASE
161
Construction Emissions (Los Gatos as a Percent of the County of Santa Clara) - OQroad Year 2008.
2008 OX.HigImzYTranda, .
2008 OffH.CFdd Tads.
2008 OXJl.,"nada
2008 00ttigrdd Tadai
2M6 OfflfdmaYTa[1a
2008 Off S&ggy Tratla
2008 Off Sglrxay TrWOn
2008 Off yaharry Tradal
3008 ORA i dad, Traclar
2008 OfllEylaaYTradon
2008 OXAOgMey Trader
2008 Off Hi9lnsay Tmaa
2000 Off Highway Taaat
zM8 Off Higliwayrrada
2M6 OffllidmaYTada
2008 Of Highway Tractors
208 Off l,Iday Treaa
2008 Off- Hidnwy Traam
2008 OflASgmay Tadas
2M8 Offxgnai Trench
2094 Off Higtasey Traaas
2008 OffHigl^"ay Tradition;
2008 00H,,.yTmada
ZM8 OR.Hig YTraders
2009 OR Higfinva eY Treads
2000 Off - Midday Tidal. ..
2000 OHJiona, Tradaa
2008 Oflifglmay Trers
24-08 OfllfyiwryTradadas
2008 Off - Highway Tawas
2008 Off-MgMwy rradas
2008 Off- HidaaYTdaft.
2008 Off H,daY Traaas
2008 OX Higind, Tradas
2008 Of lnd yTraaae
2008 Ott - Highway Trsdas
2008 Off-h iwaynadm
208 Of�Hig"Tmdm
2008 Off H,fmay Traders
2008 Off4ag' eYTactas
I08 OIFIE91wry Traders
2008 anK away TlMas
2008 OflKdmay Traders
2MB OfflfgaaJ Traders
2008 O6JfgasyT.
2009 OfiJOdary Trad-
es
2008 Offifglmry Traded
2M8 Off-Wgliwaades
2008 Off- 16daay Tyrraaaa
2008 OffHglaay TFadm
2008 Off -IOddd Trddi
2008 OdHionarTraaas
2008 Off dgh"Taaas
2008 Ofllfdary Tides
2009 O Tda
2008 Off Hi Cgw,
Taacrs
2008 Off- K,"Tides
2008 OfllfgMxay Tawas
2008 O Hgfaay Tadas
2008 Off -Ifidaay Traaas
2008 OWHigaaay Traam
2008 OJ6daaYTadas
2008 Off4gdaaY T
2108 Ofl45daaYTmdm
ad
2008 00HidaaY Trappe .
2008 OffHidmay Tadea
2008 OXJli,in -y Trades
2008 Off +Cgidd Tawas
2008 OffA,hany Trades
2MB OfllOdaayTMda
2008 Off 6glaaYTadas
2008 OHxi and, Tawas
2008 OnR and, Toads
2000 off",namY Trades
2008 Ofladmay Tames
2008 OXAfdiway Trades
2008 Ofl-Ifidaay Tadao
2008 OX46dasy Tadas
2000 Off 9,ddyTadas
2008 Oa4fdaid Trait.
2MB Ofl4fdaaYTiaada
2008 ORJ,dgd Tadae
2008 Off4pdary Tadas
2000 Off's,aay Tadas
2008 Ofl4fdaay Tadas
2M8 Ofl4Bdaay TlMas
2008 Off.t4gMgY Tradaa
2008 Off Caning, radaa
2008 OWHddn,Treads
2008 Ofl H.,h -yTW.
2008 Of H,gindy Toads
2D08 Tmdm
2008 Off Hifth ay Traders
2008 OffHignmy Taaea
2008 OIINidiway Tadas
2Me onTisewar naaas
1400 GmsWeOm and and, Epepmen
250 Calsbumon and Mining EWipmen
2% Ca56ve8manEMirnng Equipmm
250 Caabuc9a and Mining EWipmen'
250 CaaWt9a and Mining E¢ipmen
200 C."Mia alM Miring EWipmal
25D Caarvtia and Mining Equipment
250 Candandar and Mining Equipment
250 Cadruclia and Mining EWipmal
250 CaMiUCBai and Mining Equipmml
200 CarsaueUa and Mining Eq ipmml
250 CauhuNa and Mining Epipmenl
250 Cmsbuc0a and Mining Equipmml
250 Cwutructia and Mining EWpmal
250 CasW tier and Mining EWWmen1
200 Cmabrr58a1 and Wrvnp EWipmenl
250 Caabua0a and Mining Equipment
250 Ca5VUS0a and Mining Egvipmmt
250 Cazani and Mining Equipmem
250 Candr ion and Mining Equipment
250 Cas"dan and Mining Equipment
200 Cassbuc5a and Mining EpnPmenl
250 Caabuctia and Mining EWipmart
2W Crib.. and Mirvng EWi,i
250 CambucLa and Mining Equipment
250 Cad"i and Mining EWipmenl
250 Canbnotia and Mining EWipmenl
250 CaSad. and Mining Equrymenl
250 Cmstruclia and Mining Equipment
250 CasWCtia and Mining Equipment
200 Caabunda and Mining EWipmenl
2% Consbuctia and Mining EWipmenl
200 Can... and Mining Edgard.
2W Can"Man and Mining EWiMW
250 ComVUCBa and Mining EWipmenl
250 Can... antl Mining Equipment
250 Cagandi and Mining Equipment
250 Canagard n and Main, EWipmenl
250 Comlrvclion and Mining Equipment
250 Caabuc0a and Mining Epnpmed
2M Caabrxlia and Mining EWipmenl
2W Casbutia and Mining EWipmenl
200 C.O. and Muting EWipmenl
250 Caslrvc9a and Mang Equipment
2W Cand den aM Mining EWlpmmt
250 Conaburda and Mining Equipment
2W CasbusOa and Mining Equipment
250 Castructlm add Mining Equipmea
200 Cgaftni and Mining EWipmenl
200 Cand.da and Mining E,,ni,d
200 Cmnbuotia and Mining Equipment
700 Canabuc8a and Mining Equipment
200 Cmsbuclia aid Mining EWipmal
200 CasbucOm and Mining EWlpmem
7W CaaVUCtia and Mining EWigmmt
7W Can.... and Mining Eglupment
200 Cgnsbucda and Mining Equipment
700 CaSbuctia and Mining Egnpmml
700 Corrstrirctign and Mining Equipment
700 CasVUC9a and Mining EWpment
200 CasbueOm and Mining EWlpmmt
200 Caubirma and Mining Equipment
700 CandiddaW and Mining Equipment
200 con. . antl Mining EWipmal
7W CcnaWCpa and Mining Equipmad
250 Casbuc0a and Man, Epipmmt
7W CanWUCtia antl Mining Egapment
200 Consbuaia and Mining Epepmml
200 CmstrucOa aM ASnirp EgiPmml
700 CasWCOa and Mining EWpment
200 C..d. antl Mnirp EWlpmmt
7W CaaWrtia and Mining EWpment
2% Caadi antl Martin, EWipmenl
700 Casbu.an and Mining EWipmal
7% Casbuction and Ian, Equipment
700 Casbudia and Man, Equipmml
250 Cagrad -and Ina, EWpment
700 C ddri antl Mining EWlpmmt
750 CanWNa and Mining EWpment
200 Cgmbucda and Mining Equipmml
700 Casbu fia and Mining EWlpmmt
200 CaabucOm add Mand EWlpmmt
THI CagOUCtia and Mining EWipmenl
TM Oaabu<tim and Mining Equipment
TM Cmstruclia and Mining Equipment
700 Ca56uction and Mining Equipment
750 Oddid a antl Mining EWpment
TM Canai and Mining EWipmenl
TM CaeWda and Alining EWipmmt
7W Cmsbucda and Mining Equipment
TM Casbuctia and Mining EWipmenl
TM C...- and Mining Equipment
750 Casbuctia and Mining Equipmml
75D Candandid and Mining Equipmml
7% Caabvc9a and Mining Equipmml
IM COnsbuc0a and Mdin, EWlpmmt
IM Cg... and Miming Equipment
IM CasWCtiaaid MinineEWemml
pOpula00 AdSV'dr Consumps, =
--- 1. mmw"An CO2 EaM1waI MO Exhaust CH4 Exhaust CO2e 002e
lad,
209
202
41.53
4.ME 41
000E+00
435E 05
t596
2.02
6.62
39.14
1.31E-01
000E+00
4ICE'05
1995
1.95
623
3723
4ME41
0.00E +00
8.19E -05
1994
1.92
5.913
35%
3.891
0.00+000
285+05
1993
1.9
5.75
34.36
371E -01
000E-00
2561
1992
1.9
559
33.N
3.81
O.WO
2361
1991
1.89
5.44
3252
354i
0.ME +M
7.16E -05
1990
189
528
It%
300E41
0000-00
695ED5
1989
In
481
2874
313E -01
000E+00
633E 05
1988
168
am
28.06
281E 41
0.00E -00
5.74E 4)5
1987
to
3%
23.73
2.51
OMEM
670E 05
1986
1.44
3M
21A2
232E-01
060+0
605E-05
1965
1.33
118
19.14
2.07E-01
0401
5.41E 05
1 Waal
1.31
303
1625
1.97 1
0.00E+00
550E05
1983
128
2.84
1711
185E -01
0.ME+M
516E-05
1902
123
263
M.88
1211
000E-00
179E 45
1981
12
248
1498
LIOE 4I
0.00E+00
451E-05
1900
1,16
2.3
139
1.50E -01
0.00+00
4.19E-05
1979
1.02
tIM
1121
I.ME -01
aNi
3751
1978
ON
1.6
869
1011
O.ME +00
310E 05
1977
075
13
7.88
8.48E-02
000E -00
2.52E -05
1976
062
LM
6%
708 +@
OME -00
2.10E-05
1975
0,52
09
541
5 &12-02
0.00+00
173EA5
1974
042
0.73
4.00
429E-02
000+00
1.4E -05
1973
035
0.61
3%
391E-02
0.00E+00
117E 05
1972
029
0.51
3.0
322E-02
000E -00
980E45
1971
025
O44
265
2,86'+@
0.00+M
934E-05
1970
022
028
25
218E-02
0.00E+00
8091
1969
02
0,35
214
2.29E-02
&CDE +M
8 99 M
I%8
0.18
032
1.00
208E-02
006E+00
815E -W
1%7
o.n
029
128
192E-02
0Cali
751E INS
1966
0.16
027
167
139+@
0.00E+00
20I&W
1 %s
0.15
026
IN
188E-02
0.00+00
6.59E -M
HIM
0.14
034
IA7
1.58E-02
eWE +M
6.19E 06
1963
D.13
021
1.37
Lai
0.00E+00
579E-06
1%2
0.12
021
1.28
137E 42
000E +00
5 3a
1961
011
0.19
Ids
12712@
0.001
497E
1%0
CA
018
1.0
1.17E@
OME+M
4.57E46
1959
O.M
016
099
I i
000E+00
419E-06
19M
0.00
015
0.91
976E-03
Ofti
383E -OS
1957
0.08
014
0,83
8891
080E+00
3,48E OR
1956
007
013
0 .75
805E -03
0.00E+00
316E.06
Mad,
0i
011
D.67
723E-03
000+00
281EM
1954
0.05
0.1
06
6.11E 03
000+M
251 EM
1951
O.M
OM
0.52
5.58E-03
0.00E+00
2.19E-0fi
1952
0.04
0.07
01
4.761
O.MEM
LUE-06
1951
01
O.06
0.37
3 91414
0.00E+00
151E -00
1950
01
81
029
310E -03
0Wai
1.ni
1919
0.02
0.03
021
221E-03
ab0i
879E -07
1918
001
am
013
1.41E-03
000E+00
5.551
1947
0.01
0.01
006
695E-01
000E+00
272E -07
2005
013
054
1329
1.53E -01
0,00,E -00
404E.
2007
0.12
052
1338
1Afti
OME+00
495E-06
2006
0.12
OS
12]5
1AIE 41
0Wi
5
2005
0.12
0.0
1224
L35E111
o00i
.76E-06
677E-06
2001
0.12
046
11.75
12M41
0.06E+00
232E.
2003
0.11
01
1127
121E4d
OME+00
799E-06
20(K!
011
042
1083
119E41
0.00E-00
886E-05
2001
0.11
&39
998
1.101
000E+00
safti
200)
0.12
0.42
107
Cali
O.CCi
101E+05
1999
011
0.19
10.16
1.12E -01
OiW+M
9 M
1998
0.11
0.37
963
t0i6i
OOM+00
.72E
922EM
1997
011
035
9.11
1.00E-01
0.00E+00
8]f EC6
Mae
0.1
&M
BM
91
OM +M
821ES6
1995
0.1
Odl
8.16
&w.02
0.00+00
164&05
1991
0.1
0.3
7.81
8.52E-02
0.00 +M
1.9E-05
1933
0.1
029
7.00
821EM
000E+00
151E 4)5
1992
01
028
7.W
299E -02
0.00E+00
1A7E -05
1991
0.1
027
7.12
7 .771
000E+00
1,131
1990
el
D27
6.91
7UEM
0.00+00
I39+05
1969
ON
024
6.3
5.81
000E+00
1.271
1988
O.W
022
521
6.21EM
0.00E+00
115E -05
1987
0.00
02
5.31
5.61E-02
000+00
128EAd
1986
O.07
0.18
48
5.081
OWE
116E -05
19M
007
0.16
429
451E-02
0.00+00
I.ME -05
19&
007
015
400
4.321
0Wi
1.051
1983
0.06
0.14
383
105EM
0.00E+0o
9.0EM
1982
0.06
013
3,56
3.761
O0th+
9.17E -M
1981
ON
0.12
336
155+00
0,00E+00
865E-00
1900
age
0.12
3.12
3291
000E -00
8.03E-06
1979
000
0.1
262
22MM
0.00E+00
213+00
1978
0.04
OM
2.17
221
OME+M
590EA6
1977
ON
0.07
126
LWEM
0.00E+00
478E-06
1976
0.00
OM
147
1.00+00
0.ME+M
399E-06
1975
O.M
OM
121
128EM
ow
3.301
1974
aw
a"
0.99
105+00
0.00E+00
270E-06
1973
002
083
082
8.00E-03
0.00E+00
222E-06
1972
0.01
0.00
089
7281
000E+00
LIVE M
1971
0.01
002
0.59
627E-03
0.ME+M
1.78E.06
1970
0.01
ON
051
5,13E,03
OMEM
154E-06
1969
001
O.M
048
5031200
0.CCi
172E-06
1960
061
002
O43
4.56E-0J
aQD +00
1.00E-06
1967
0.01
0.01
OA
42 i
O.M +M
143E-06
1%5
001
001
0.37
392E -0J
0.00E -M
121E-06
1955
0.01
0.01
035
368+00
000E+00
126+16
1961
001
DO1
on
3A[i
0.00+00
110E-06
1963
001
0.01
031
3.21E -03
000E+00
1.11E-06
1962
0.01
0.01
029
3011
0.00E+0D
103E-06
467E -01
390E -01
326E 01
356E -01
356E 41
3AMAd
3,14 1
2851
2.58E -05
233E -01
205E 41
198E -01
181
1.72E -01
lai
1.51E -01
1.271
LOSE -0i
853E-02
7.12E-02
586E-02
4.82E-02
397E-02,
3.74E-02
288i
219E-03
2,311
269Ea2
1.91+00
180E -02
69E-02
1.59EM
149E-02
126 +@
Uai
118E-02
1.00+00
981E -03
6.98603
612E -03
729E-03
6.46E-03
563E 43
4.80E-03
397EA3
3.12E-03
225E-03
1.43EA
7.00E-01
133E-01
1ATE -01
1AIE41
35E-01
1.30E -01
1.25E -01
120E 41
110E -0I
118E -01
112E-01
1.061
101EAH
9.48E-02
893EL2
8.56E-02
8.21E-02
801
2801
7.57E-02
6 ME-02
625EL2
565EM
5.10E-02
456E-02
435 4i
407200
3.78E -M
3.57E-02
3.311
219EM
200EM
1.81
I S6EM
129E-02
106E-0Y
869E -03
7.321
631E-03
5.441
597E -03
459E -03
4.Mi
391
3 .711
3456 -03
326E-03
3.01
Construction Emissions (Los Gatos as a Percent of the County of Santa Clara) - ORroad Year 2008.
2008 Ofl44ymay Traders
2006 in+wm2ynne.
moss offing yTradm
2008 Ofl4iphxryTratlda
2008 ORl99M1wyTra
2198 ORltidmay Trnatlas
2008 Off i,aad, Trappe
2008 OflJ6dmay Traders
2008 Off.Hm ay Tmtlda
2099 Off gaaaayy Traders
2008 off+wmay Tendon
2009 OR�IOghany TradwS
2001 OfflOjtwy Tratlm
2909 Off4g, ay TlMm
2006 OffJBgmaq Trades
MOO Oflifgmay Trades
M ORJBgImay Tndm
A06
20 Off- Hlgllway Tratlm
2008 OR-MymaYTMm
2000 ORJBamaY Trani.
2008 OR.HymaY Taaara
2008 OR-18omentIrades
2000 Ofl- lfHlivwYTrxsm
2000 OR- FBa�aey Tredm
2008 OR4ipImeYTatles
2008 OflFBpnaay Traders
2IX8 OR #4g1enYTadas
2008
2008 Ofl3lgM1way Ofl+f th"Tratlds
Tmtlm
2008 OOJtiglmay Tmdm
2008 OR- ttiHlnrry Titles
2008 OfflOglmey Tralda
Most OHHIHImay Tradm
M Off- HigMny Tratlm
20OO 08 ORJIi9msaY Tredm
MM01114rffai Tratlm
2008 Off�Xigamy Tradm
2004 MM off-HiHOamil-amm
2008 OR Mgmeay Tradm
MW OR-HighemY Tendons
2008 Off- Higlmay Tratlm
2001 Off- Hay Tradm
2088 OR-HignamgtiaaY Tradm
2008 OX- Hi9tiaaY Traders
nOB OR- H.,"Tratlm
MOO
2008 Off.Hlgnwry TrMm
3008 Off - Hotemy Tiadm
208 Off-ucim.y Tndm
and Off -1-ti, YTadm
2008 Off-Xlgnwry Tndm
NOE
AM OXildmeaY Tratlm ary 2008 Off "heay Radon
3008 00- mommy Tladm
2008 OB.Hqui T.
2008 OXHiHbaaYTrades
2008 OR Hi9RwaY Tradm
2008 OII H..Y T..
2008 OI Rgh, nninatlm
2008 Off.faay Tradm
MW offlHd aay Tratlm rs
2008 06Xigm'aY Tradm
2900 Off h9lmay Trades
20091 HIM Off-Higtiaay Tradm
208 OR- M50wey Tradm
MW Off- Hi,iman, Tradm
2008 OX H igha-ey Tenders
2006 O11HignvaY Tadm
2005 Off. ,ffvnYTnt-
2008 offiiglmay Tradm
3000 Ofl4BglneY His
note OR40gnaaY Tndm
2000 OR15HImay Tatlm
2008 Ofl-W9amY TrMm
2003 OHHgM1amy Tsaders
2008 Ofl- 1591maY Tralm
MOB
neat Offkgnivay Tu.
W" oR- Hglmay d a t
2008 wmpas?aMm
2008 N wmpenyidlam
A
2O" wn0as?enM5
2006 wnaeMeMas
2008 wn0esnenam
2000 wmpaN7eMes
moon wmonwrenmn
2008 wmpaNenMs
2008 wmµasRentlera
2008 wmpemRaMm
Most wmpeYlmtlers
not wmpeartemm
2009 wmpes/Tendm
2008 wmpeNrerMae
2008 wmpas/]aMas
2009 wmpeNreMaa
2808 wmpus?endea
2008 wmpeMmMrs
MW OMSCemacBet Equipment
2008 nne CeanusOpa Eenpment
2000 ONtt Cmstrution Epdpmenl
TW Coadamem and Mining Equipment
TW Camemumm and Mining Equa mem
TW Cdubuc5m and Mining Equamet
TW CosebuNm am Mining Equipment
TW CanWpBm mM Mining Equipment
750 CmAUCtim and FGniy Equipment
750 CmWUdron and Wining Eguipmem
700 Cmstrumon and Mining Equipment
700 wmb . and Mining Equipment
700 Conabuelion and Mming Equipment
700 Caubus9on and Muting Equipment
700 Cmsb .. and Mning Eµipment
700 Cmsbuetian and Mining EWWmenl
700 Con... and Mining Equipment
1000 Conatumm and &Oning EWipneal
JOW Cmsbuc9m and Mining Equipment
1000 Conabucdm and Mining EWignent
1000 CmsbuNan and Mining EWmmtit
1000 Lwssbucdon and Mining Equipment
AN Consbuc0on and Mining Equipment
IOW CmeWC4M and Mining Equipment
IM ConShucdm and Mining Equipment
1000 Ce¢huNm and Mining Equipment
1000 CmaWNm and Mining Equipment
MW CmstruNm and 81itin9 Equipment
1000 Canbua8m and Mining Equipment
1000 CmshucOm and Mining Equipment
1900 C.O. and Miing Equipment
1000 CashuNm and Mining Equipment
1WO CaaWct. and Mining Equipment
1090 CaaaucOm end Mining Equipment
1000 CauWet. and Mmn9 Equipment
1090 Conadm m and Mining Equipment
MO CoreWCtlm ant Muting Ectdpmmt
IWO Conabuedm and Mining Equipment
MOO Ceabuctim and ROnin9 Equipment
IM Cm1We5m and Mining Equipment
IOOO Cembuc8m and Mining Equipment
IWO CmaPmBm antl Mang Equipment
IM Caabumm and Mining Equipment
IOOO CmnWCBm and Mag Equipment
IOW Construction and Mining Equipment
IOW Construed. and Mning Equipment
IOW Cwstruclion and Mning Equipment
ION coma lion and Mning Equipment
IOW ConaWelion and Mining Equipment
Man Cadrutim ant Mining Equipment
IOW CmaWCdon ant Mining Equipment
Man Ciampi and Mining Equipment
1000 GondncBm and Mining Equipment
1000 Conmmuffm and Mining Equipment
MOO C... and Mining Equipment
1000 Ceabuctim and Mining Equipment
1000 GonsducEon and Mining Equipment
IOW Cameue8m and Mining Egnpmenl
1000 CmsWeBm and Mining Equipment
1000 Cms6uatim and Mining Equipment
1000 Cewbuc8m and Mining Equipment
1000 Cgn5hnc5m and Mamp Equipment
1000 Cessb.. ant Mining Equipment
MOO Camidemdm and Mining Equipment
VON CmshucOm and M-9 Equipment
1000 C.O. and Mining Equipment
1000 CammeSm end Munn, Equipment
1000 Came... ant Mang Equipment
1000 consNUlion aN Meng Equipment
JON CaeAution uM Meng Egdpmmt
1000 O.a. ant Mining Egdpment
1000 command- ad Mning EquimeM
IOW Cgndevi and Mining Equipment
IM CaaWMan and Mining Equipment
IOW ConstruNm and Mining Equipment
IOW CmaWNon and Mining Equipment
IM Caatruction and Me, Equipment
IOW CanWCEm and Mining Equipment
1000 Cons.- and Mining Eypmml
25 Canbuetim and Mining Equipment
25 wn... and Mining Equipment
25 C.... and Mining Equipment
25 CmsNntion antl Mining Equipment
25 Caenteponand Mirng Equipment
25 Cmsbuctimand Mning EWWmem
25 Camimeiionand Mning Equipment
25 CmWUdma and Mining Equipment
25 Constanni and Mining Equipment
25 Cann ion and Mang Equipment
25 Cmeari and Mining Equipment
25 Cone... and Miring Equipment
25 Cm10uam and Mining Equipment
25 CoabuNm end Mining Equipment
25 CamaNen. and Mning Equipment
25 Caabumon ant Meng Equipment
25 Cons Wed. ant Memo Equipment
25 Canadian. and Means Equipment
16 CaabuNon eM Mining Equipment
15 CmdauNOn and Mang Equipment
16 Cmsbumon din Mning Equipment
MY
Popalatio
n
activBY
Itioumai
Consamptiu
n
CO2Exha.MIcOEaNu.CH4EalaNI
COA
CO2
1961
001
001
OM
228E 43
0OW.W
9A9E07
2.WE -03
I
1900
0.01
001
024
2.56E -03
080E-00
67311
2.58E-0I
1
1959
0
001
022
2.34E -03
0.00E -00
299E W
226E-03
I
1958
0
001
02
IME -03
OBOEW
220E W
2.16E-03
1
1957
0
001
01
1.95E -03
OWE -00
665E-0]
1.96E -03
1
1956
0
001
0.17
1.77E -03
OOOE -00
60311
128EL3
1
1955
0
001
0.15
1.51
OWE -00
542E47
160E -03
1
1958
0
0
O.I3
IAIEm
000E -00
400E -07
IAM-03
0
1953
0
0
0.12
1.Y3EAM
0.00E -00
418E -07
1.9E -03
0
1952
0
0
0.1
1.00E -03
000E -W
3.00E 07
185E -03
0
1951
0
0
0.08
863E-01
000E-00
295E 07
8.69E -d
0
19W
0
0
006
880E-04
OOOEW
232E-07
O.BSEM
0
1949
0
0
0.05
492E-04
O.WE -00
168E -07
4.95E-0s
0
1948
0
0
0.03
3.10E-01
0WE -00
1 M 07
3.12E-0s
0
1947
0
0
0.01
1.52E-(M
&ME -W
520E -08
163E-01
0
2108
0.01
008
2.00
2.31E4)2
OWEW
689EAR
231E0?
8
2007
0.01
0.00
201
2.22E-02
000E -00
882E 07
2]2E-0i
7
2003
0.01
000
1.93
213E-02
0.00E -W
113E-06
2.13E-02
T
2005
001
0.00
185
2.01E-02
OWEIN
151E-06
2.05EM
T
2004
0.01
005
1.78
rMi
000E-00
151E-06
196E-02
T
M03
001
005
1.71
1.WEO2
OWE -W
151E-06
1.83E-02
6
2002
001
ON
164
1.81E-02
O.WE-W
150E06
1.81E-02
6
no,
0.01
001
1.51
I.66EM
O.WE -W
I43Et
lki
6
2000
001
ON
162
128E-00
000E -00
rMEM
1.79E402
6
19"
0.01
001
1.55
1.69E-02
OOOE -W
261
1.70E-02
6
1998
001
ON
IAT
1.81E-02
OWE"
200E -06
1.61E -02
5
1997
0.01
001
139
I.52EM
000E -W
236EL6
1.52E-02
5
19%
0.01
ON
1.31
IA3EM
OME.M
222E -05
1A3EM
5
1995
01
003
123
tMEM
O.WE -W
2WE46
1.3KAR
4
1991
0.01
0.03
IA$
129EM
OWE -W
200E -05
119EM
4
1993
01
OW
1.14
124E-M!
O.WE -W
193E -W
I2IM
4
I992
0.01
0.03
1.11
121EM
OWE -W
188E -06
121EM
4
1991
0.01
0.03
1.00
IATEM
OOOE -W
Liti
I.18EM
4
19%
0.01
0.03
1.01
I.tlEM
OME -W
I27E4)6
IMEtC
1
1939
001
0.03
0.95
IOIEM
000E -00
1.61 E.
IMEM
3
1988
0.01
0.03
ON
942E -03
OME -00
146E-06
9.45E-03
3
1987
001
0.02
08
8.51EL
OOOEW
I.94EW
855EM
3
19M
0.01
0.01
073
268E -03
OME -W
175E -W
7.72E-0I
3
1985
001
0.02
065
6.81
OWE -00
156E -06
6.00E -03
2
19"
0.01
002
0.62
651E -03
OME -00
1.59E-06
6.51
2
1983
001
002
058
6.13EL3
000E -W
149E W
6.16E -03
2
1902
0.01
0.01
8.51
5.69E -03
OWE -00
1.39E -W
596 -03
2
1981
0.01
001
051
536EM
O.WEW
131E Do
5.39E-03
2
190
0.01
081
047
4.98E -03
000E-00
121E W
5001
2
1979
0.01
001
OA
4191
O.WEW
106E W
4211E-CO
I
1918
0
ON
033
3.46E -03
0 WE -00
891E-07
348E4M
1
1977
0
001
0.27
281EM
OME -0O
791 -W
283E-03
I
1975
0
001
09
235E-03
OWE -00
604E -07
226E4M
1
1975
0
0
0.18
LWE -03
080EW
498E -W
1.85E-0J
I
1974
0
0
0.15
1.591
000E -00
406E -07
1.60E -03
1
1973
8
0
0.12
1.31E -03
O.WEW
IME 7
1.31E-03
0
1972
0
0
0.1
1.101
OAOE -W
283E W
1.11E -03
0
1971
0
0
ON
9.18E-04
000E -W
270E.07
951E-01
0
1910
0
0
0.08
821E-01
000E -00
2.33E07
826E-01
0
1969
0
0
O.W
261E-04
0.00E-00
2 W -W
T.6i
0
1968
0
0
007
6.89E-01
OWE"
235E-07
6.91E-01
0
1967
0
0
ON
6.351
O.WE -W
2.17E -07
610E -01
0
logo
0
0
ON
593E-01
0.00E -00
202E -07
597E -04
0
1965
0
0
005
5.51EW
000E -00
1.00E-07
561E-01
0
1964
0
0
0.05
523EM
000E-00
179E -07
527E"
0
1963
0
0
0M
400E-01
000E -00
187E-07
493E-01
0
1962
0
0
ON
455E-04
OOOEW
155E W
1.59E-04
0
1961
0
0
004
421E -M
OOOE -W
144E -07
424E-01
0
1900
0
0
001
387E-01
0110E -00
133E-07
3.00E-01
0
1959
0
0
0.03
354EM
000E -00
121E -07
3.57E."
0
1958
0
0
003
324E-01
OOOEW
MOE07
326E-01
0
1957
0
0
0.03
295E-01
000E -00
101E W
2.971
0
19%
0
0
003
2.61E-01
000E-00
9.11 E 00
269E-04
0
1955
0
0
0.02
2AOE-01
000E -00
8.19E 08
2.42E -W
0
1954
0
0
0.02
2AM3
000E -W
726E -08
2.14E-4M
0
1953
0
0
002
1.85E-01
oWEW
6108
187E-01
0
1952
0
0
0.01
158E-01
OOOEW
538E -08
1.596"
0
1951
0
0
001
130EM
000E 4W
445E 08
1.31E-01
0
19M
0
0
0.01
101
0.00E -00
3 5 Eul
1.07E-01
0
1949
0
0
0.01
T.NE -M
0.00E -W
254E�08
7.19E -05
0
1948
0
0
0
4.69E-05
QWE -W
160E-09
4.T2E-05
0
1917
0
0
0
2.30E-05
0MIL."
2WE 09
232E-05
0
2008
01
028
01
IMEM
000E-00
1.18E-07
169E-03
0
2007
0.15
018
0.1
IME -03
O.WEW
115E 07
Lei
0
2006
0.15
027
OW
101
000E -W
1.11&07
1.02EM
0
2005
0.14
on
O.W
9.83E-01
0 .WE -00
107E07
9.85E-01
0
2004
0.13
014
000
9."EM
000E -W
111E-07
900E-01
0
2003
0.12
022
0.00
11 5E
OME -00
101E -07
81
0
2002
&I
0.19
007
7.14E-01
O WE"
8.73E 00
7.16E-01
0
2001
0.1
017
ON
665E-01
OWE -00
8.12E42
6.WE-01
0
2000
ON
0.17
0"
8.11E-01
OWE -W
283E -08
6.42E-01
0
1999
ON
008
003
207E-04
OLOE -00
1.01E -07
2.96E-01
0
1998
0.00
am
002
220E 1
OWE -00
274E 08
2.9E-04
0
1997
ON
005
002
L62EI1
OWE -W
640E 08
1 &E"
0
1936
On
0"
0.01
142E-01
O.00EW
498EM
1. 43E-W
0
1995
0.01
003
001
9.82E-05
000E -00
3.15E -08
9.90E-05
0
1994
0.01
0Or
001
6YIf-0S
eWE -W
2.19E-08
627E-05
0
1993
0
0,01
0
2.89E-05
OAOEW
102E-08
2.92E-05
i3
1992
0
0
0
178E-05
&DOE -00
624E-09
179E-05
0
1991
0
0
0
5.97E-06
O.WE -W
2161
6. 01EM
0
2008
589
11.14
514
562E -02
000EW
5.91E-05
5 6411
19
2007
5.3
10.03
463
50711
000E -00
532E -M
&1
17
"M
4.57
6"
3.99
4.36EM
000E -W
458E-06
437EM
14
Construction Emissions (Los Gatos as a Percent of the County of Santa Clara) - Ciffroad Year 2008.
Pedaggisguip Arefireft, cmermanni
auciptairequit case
2WO Mer Capeaturresen Equipment
0
15
Gernermatran and Mining Ecturrament
MISS
128
2,42
112
1 �E Q
OME-00
NOB Or. Coarequireadon Equignmerat
D
15
Creatimi and Mining Equipment
2004
On
1.18
OU
1.281
1�42
2M Mar Cagartmearain Equipment
D
15
Careadmi and Marang Equipment
2003
0.17
032
5 Mit
DbDE.00
7 71 E 07
5 ME43
Ass Mer Cargamption Equipment
D
25
Cmustrui and &terms Equipment
HIM
ON
1
'15
1-601
OADE-00
2 ME 07
1.61
TWO M. creamed. Equi,marnat
D
25
Camemagen and Near, Equipment
NOT
05
0 94
0.8
6.571
OADEiH)
7 16E 07
sMIE-T3
MCI Met carregrapi Equipment
D
25
Carwarmairm and Mining Equipment
NOW
0.47
0.89
ON
6ni
O.00E-M
6 75E 07
6.NEA3
NOR Met Equipment
0
25
Canderetricar and Mmmg Equipment
2005
0.43
0.81
AM
OA9
5A7i
0 Ali
6107
6 Mi
20W Mar Ciandanumbeen Equipment
D
26
Comerearegan and Mamma Equipment
Nap
0.4
0.75
5.371
0.001
5 1
5381
NOT Mar E"pringent
D
25
Carearregram and Mining Equipment
NO,
ON
045
411
(TODE-00
6 01
4.971
2005 Met Careguregain Equipment
D
25
Cameargereir and Mi Equipment
AM
025
0.4
4.Ui
Ow.OD
5 ME 07
4.36E-03
MOS Mar Dandame"mar Equipment
D
25
Carageneri and Mining Equipment
2001
0.09
0.17
0,15
IA8EA3
OADE-00
2,05E�07
l�M43
TOM Mar carestmeadown Ertuaterreed
D
25
Candameder, ard plains Etitaterment
nas
AAA
0A2
0.1
LIVE-0
0,M�
1.36E OF
1.11i
NOW Mar Cametruden Equipment
0
25
and Munne, Equipment
1 ON
OAM
007
OAT
7.94E�
O'��
9 70L 0
7%EQ4
20M Mm consumption Equipment
D
25
Camerruden and Mining Equipment
1 M
ON
ON
0 "
431
0.001
1 ME 07
4ME41
20M Mar Equipment
TO
25
Canatmeareir and Mining Erman.
,,
OM
001
OA2
0.01
2.37E,I1
0 Sidi
032E SO
2 391
20M Mar Canagarrigan Equitument
D
As
communion and Mining Equipment
AN
A,SA
0.9
7NEA5
OME-M
255EM
7 32E,05
TICKS Mar Conedgmed- Equipment
D
As
Campurnmeman ad Mining Eitummend,
NOT
AM
O'N
1,15
INE-M
0eOE-OO
3,35EA7
1261
2005 Met Equipment
D
SO
Coargatereflan and Mining Equipment
Nil
U
00
1.0
I.Il-N
0AQi
7 OFE-07
Ini
2008 01 CamearcIan Equipment
0
As
and Mining Equipment
2005
0.31
LOT
1AZi
OADE-00
8 a4E417
rtri
NOR Me, Con. Equipment
D
SO
and Mining Equipment
NO4
ITS
0.75
so
ON
1ME42
OADE+OO
1241
Usi
NM Mar Equipment
D
W
Ciargetrud. -a Me.., Saari
TOM
IN
0.63
On
9.51
O.ODE`0D
I ME M
9AIE43
20081 01 Ceregingreirm Ecturtgament
D
SO
Carearneetion ad Mirm, Equipreent
212
11
0.57
082
8 751
0.001
11 A
B.&I
2005 Mar Carstrueffen Equitrament
D
"
cementation and Means Equipment
NM
on
on
0.75
0.0
BME43
OWE.00
3 95E M
8.101
Mar 0i Candenumbeen Equiturament
0
As
constants. and Mgmer, Equipment
gaggs
1.21
1
737EA3
0AMEAD
3SIE-06
7rSEII3
201 Mar Equipment
D
SO
and Mining Equipment
INS
024
0 "
OAM
6 SHE-03
0,�-W
3.601
6.72EA3
2003 Othear Equipment
D
N
Conatruptian and gerung Equipment
less
OM
As
0.57
6.��3
0 W&W
3 44E-06
C161ii
AN Mar Comenturriarri Equipment
D
SO
consumption and Mining Equipment
1997
AM
am
053
5.531
OME+OO
4Ai
5 (1
ZOM Met Equipment
D
SO
Candamudam and Mining Equipment
INAS
021
e3l
0.47
0.42
4.91E43
OME.00
VOE,N
4.Mi
2008 Opi �ragrucrearr Equipment
0
50
Campareparr and Mining Equipment
INS
0.2
017
4.��3
0ADEeM
3AIE-06
4 451
NOW Met Gonmentutudin Equipment
D
W
Conersuption and Mapang EWpmi
IN,
O.IS
Us
D.37
0�1!
3441
0Agi
3 WEAS
3ANA3
21008 1 Consummation Equipment
D
0
Conarturriden and Mining Equipment
1993
0.17
0.2
13211
ObOi
2331
1381
2008 Met Carratmei Equinagal
D
W
Conaristri and Mining Equipment
I ON
ki
0.11
027
0.15
21nE43
OADE+OD
2.33E N
2,821
agul other Candgmetrat Ecuterneent
D
SO
Cagentrueram and pumps Equipment
INI
0.07
OAT
1521
OAM.00
131E-M
Isi
NOW Mar Carmaresmar Equipment
0
ill
Campandear and Mining Equipment
JOIN
0.%
0.06
0A
IA,WA3
OAM-00
ONE 07
1.061
NOW (N.C.Magualan Equipment
0
SO
Canatimeman and nan, Equipment
11,
0AG
OAS
0.0
0,07
9AN4I
GADE.00
TME 07
9nE-84
2008 Other Equipreent
D
0
Carratimetreart and Mining Equipment
Ill
0.11
OA5
7.701E01
0.00E+OO
610E-07
7 Bi
AN Wher, Candenuarion Equipment
0
SO
and Mining Equipment
19V
OAT
Ol
OAKS
6 51IE4ut
0,001
5.671
6.61
2005 Mar Caustrappern Emignment
D
W
Canumplan and Mining Equipment
1 ill
D.03
0.03
0.0
5.01
DIODErAI)
4 52E 07
5111
TOM Met (Equipment
D
SO
Canagnereficia and Minial Equipment
III
(i
ON
0 M
4,111
Q.ME+OO
3.71E�7
4251
2008 Mar Canatruplan Equipment
0
SO
Construction and Sher, Equipment
11,
0+0
OAG
0.03
0
141E-01
0001
301
3ASEM
2008 M. Caused. Equipment
D
0
Carearametteren and Mining Equipment
1913
0.03
OA3
Out
4.Ni
0.01
3 75E 07
4 Vi
NM Mar comeardection Ectimmard
0
SO
Capastarri and Mi Ectmearead
1 AM
I.,
AM
AM
3 Ni
OAQE-OO
1501
4.001
200 Mar Canarmed. Equimmunt
D
As
C... and Merem, Equipment
1981
0.01
0,01
AM
2.911
0.001
2 59E 07
Zini
TOM Mar Cannumactim Ecippremer
D
SO
and Mining Ecturtiment
1984)
ATOJ
0.01
002
118111-04
O.00E+OD
1.76E 07
21
2008 Met cementation Equipment
0
SO
cementation and Ifirem, Equipment
1979
0AI
sir,
0.01
1.461
&ODi
I 30E 07
1.495-04
TOM Mer comparison Eurgerament
u
0
and Mining Equipment
19M
0
0
0,01
ISTEAS
0.00i
&52E.
91SE05
2006 Mae consumption Equipment
0
SO
and Means Equipment
1977
0
0
0
0
4.711
aw"M
4A9i
4.79111
NOT Mar Cureadermation Equipment
D
120
Carearmarean and Mimm, Equipment
NOR
OAS
1.49
1.uME-1315
OAOE`M
1�30E 08
1491&46
AM Mar Candaturegan Equipment
D
IN
and Mining Equipment
NOT
0,W
IAI
SAT
111
6 1
O.ME-M
1.431
6.021
NOW
D
IN
and later, Equipment
2006
D.53
In
5.701
OME.OQ
2 ME M
53M�
2006 M. Comparderr Equip.
D
IN
Candeareaddart and plain, Equipment
20M
11
1 M
4,07
5.35E.4a
0.�+W
2.72E Ol
5 MEAT
2OOB OffeaCandisgunden Equipment
D
IN
Gentemption and! Miami, Equipment
Not
1
1.13
AM
4,17
4A7E-Q
DAOEr1M
lNE N
4Ai
Mar Met Camentudgen Equipment
D
IN
Cametairman and Mimmg Equipment
203
0.47
IA3
4Adi
0.0101S.00
5ME Is
4.51
AN Mar Equipment
D
IN
C.. and Mining Equiperneral
NOT
0.45
0.0
3.84
4ASi
00012.00
01
4NEA2
Ass Met Cart. Equipment
D
420
and Main, Equipment
M01
0."
OAT
362
3 81
0.001
9.271
3.841
21305 Met Comearmaiguen Equipment
0
120
and Mining Equipment
2000
0.41
0.78
3,24
3.511
OMi
8 74E N
33W�
Was fter Camearruction Equipment
0
120
and Mining Equipment
lares
OA
0.72
292
3.171
OME+AO
&07E�
3ASE42
20M Mer Comearamplan Equipment
D
IN
Candarturegon and Muni Equipment
JOIN
on
OA5
2M
2,43
2AIEAZ
0 OOE.W
7,571
2.921
TOM Ofter Camedinteripmen Equipment
D
120
Cansami ad Mining Equipment
117
am
AN
2Ai
OODREAD
TME-06
21
Wde Mar Equipment
D
IN
and Mining Equipment
1 M
0.35
062
216
2 341
OAME-00
6,111
2.35E�
TOM Mar considered. Equipment
D
In
Careadmirgain and timing Equipment
INS
0.32
OA5
1,93
2.091
O,W+W
5 76E M
2.101
2OW 0i Carmatimprom E"tament
D
IN
Caudgenuarm and Mining Equipment
I AM
0,3
OAT
169
Ili
0.00i
5.13E Ol
I.i
2908 Mar construction Equipment
D
120
Conaindefien and Mining FiWiparimt
19N
ON
a 33
1.`*
1
1AW-M
0 01
4611
1 si
2008 Mar Equipment
0
In
and Mining Eseament
JIM
0.16
0.18
22
1.321
D.Mi
3811
1 3gi
Mass Mar Cameasurefiern Ecturprareas
D
120
Candemi and Mining Em,ment
11,
Oil
012
067
7XE-Q3
OAME-00
2.12E�
7.311
NOW Mar Equipment
D
120
Gaingrampean and Mining Em.parma
I M
0.1
0.11
a."
4ATEA3
&OW."
IA6E M
5AIi
2008 Mar congregation Eitatemand
D
IN
Conagau. and &items Equipment
1959
0AIT
ass
04
4TZ&,O3
0.�-M
r27E.
4.3WIE-41
2004 Other0andeduppernEquitianneent
D
1 TO
Caringsuppon and Mining Eituperma
19M
0.07
am
0.34
3ai
OO(HE`OO
1'"i
3.W�
2008 Mar cardinal. Equipment
D
120
Camernmelarr and Mining Equipment
1987
AM
ON
on
3.11
OME-0)
91
1126�
Ass Mar Cormaguadon Equipment
0
120
Cannerearedon and Mining Errampaim
,,
0 As
so
023
0.19
2 MAI
0 Mi
1.0412 N
2.451
2005 Mar Canagnmetain Equipment
0
In
considered. and Marim, Equipment
ill
a."
ON
1.9191
OADE.00)
8 fit E 07
ZOIE-03
NOB Mer Comeenedicar EWpmwt
D
IN
consumption and; Name Equargerment
USES
AMes
00
0.15
Iai
OAME+0D
SITE 07
1ACE43
2008 Mar Equipment
D
IN
reas "..a Equipment
1983
OA4
D�M
0.19
018
2Ai
0AMel
SAAEA7
2soi
NOR MeaGainatemedparEquMent
D
120
and Mining Equipment
111
0.03
OA3
lai
OADE-00
&WE*7
IAAEAI
NM Mar EqWW.l
D
120
Careausumarar and Mining Equipment
I,,,
OA2
OA2
0.13
0.0
Ili
OOM�w
524E�07
1.401
2OM Met Equipment
D
120
Carmani and Mining Equipment
110
AM
0.02
9.421
OADE-00
4A3E 07
gai
2008 Mar ISpurtargera
0
IN
Candi and u.n., Equipment
111,
101
001
0,07
ON
6 w4g,
010i
2Mi
7.03EAp;
TOM Mar Equipment
D
IN
Carearmate. arm! Mining Equipment
1978
0.01
sat
4A7i
Dbi
1951
461fiali
Mar Mer Carrassualare Eateparres
D
IN
Conagenicarm ad Mean, Equipment
11,
0
0
0 AT
22412434
0 DOE-00
91
2ns0f
2M Mar containers. tieparmand
D
Conatirms. ad Main, Equipment
gagas
0.77
2.05
0.01
6 WAS
0 WE+W
2351
TME*a
Ass Met Canderepation Equipment
D
�75
75
Carnevurflan and and, Equipment
207
0.75
IAS
go
1091
0.0011
261
IAWEAI
2008 Mar Eiguatimment
D
175
Conermatew and garen, Equipareen
Nes
0.74
in
9A2
LNE-41
0 Ali
293EN
IACEA
2008 Mar Can. EWM.
D
175
Carmarni and Mi Equatiment
Nes
,,
IJ
ass
9131
DME+W
4.32E-M
9J4E42
2003 Mar Equipment
0
175
Generated- ang "a" Ectuiparmant
2004
oA8
IN
8.23
765
I"E42
OADE-00
4 401
91
NORS Mar Equipment
D
175
and Mining Equipment
2003
0.0
1,13
&WE412
0.001
51
8311
HOW Met Cameareadon Equipment
D
175
and Mining Equipmerna
2002
ass
rat
&W
7 Sdi
OAMS-00
6,941
Tani
NOS
D
175
consumer. and Neen, Equipment
MITI
0A
1.2
CIS
6.951
Arai
I isi
6 "1
Mar Met cementation Equipment
D
175
and Mining Equipment
20M
TV
I As
I'M
6.391
OME+W
1.021
5A1E*2
2005 Mae Carminged. Equipment
D
175
and Marre, Equipment
I ASS
ON
ON
5.28
531
OW+W
1.011
&71
NOO M. Cameni Equipment
D
175
and Mining Equipment
1 M
Cll
0.9
4 U
5281
0AMEAD
945606
5nE-M
TOM Mi Equipment
D
175
Caregraudion and Mining Earmiamper
Ill
0.5
as
4A
3A
4 806411?
OAM-O0
8171
4.821
20% Mar Canargarchure Ewigment
D
175
Camarma. and Mar, Equipment
JM
0.0
0.71
4.261
0 Mi
7 92E N
4Vi
2003 Offamear CaregImetrum E�Iprqmqa
D
175
Carearquadfien and, Mining Equipment
INS
045
am
3,18
3,801
0.001
InE.
3.8211
Mar Mar Equipment
D
175
deas Maps EqWMmt
IN,
0.42
am
3.05
3ME-12
0 OOE.OD
ai
3.341
NOR met camagi Equipment
D
175
and Means Equipment
113
ITU
0."
2 64
2Ai
DAOE+OO
5 6311
ZNE.M
Man Carearm.- Equipment
0
175
and Mining Equipment
1 NO
am
025
22
2 41
O,Wt+m
4.761
2.4111
TWA Mar Equipment
D
175
Carragargentren and Mgm, Equipment
1991
0.15
0.17
121
1.3211
O'��
2 si
I M-M
career Canstametim Equipment
D
175
Careargaiden sped liffinard, Equipment
INA
0.13
DAI
9 Out
OME-00
1.81
sONA3
0+15
032
741
0 Mi
1.591
7ABIEW
Construction Emissions (Los Gatos as a Percent of the County of Santa Clara) - Offroad Year 2008
CY EquMnnai
Fuel Mai Class
MY
PopulaEe
n
Activity
madw ay1
Consui
n
CO2ELUuM g2OExh.V CIMESM1a ad
0020
CO2a
2008 ONC CmsoucOm Ewipmenl
D
125
Camgund. and Mining EWPmm1
1989
0.11
013
061
688E -03
000E-36O
135E-06
8311E-03
2
2008 OhM Cmaga... Equipmml
O
125
Cianni and Mining Ewipmenl
1988
0.1
0.11
ew
564E-03
000E -W
1.14E W
562E-03
2
2008 OWn Cana. in an Ewipmend
D
125
Co¢Ouv9on and Mining EWipmml
1902
0.08
008
041
4 ,41E -03
0.00E+00
115E-06
4,43E-03
1
2008 0# C..,iam Epnpmml
O
125
Con audIm and Mining EWTmen1
1 N
0.06
0.02
033
362E-40
OWE -W
9.45E-02
3UE 43
1
2008 Olhn Cms0uc8m Ewipmenl
D
125
CmsPUCtim and..ng EWipmml
1905
0.05
0.06
022
2.96E -03
OCOEa00
724E -02
298E -03
1
ZWB Otlsr Canagni mEWipmml
D
125
CmsWCtion and Mining Ewipmenl
19M
0.06
002
O.N
3.fi6E -M
000E -00
102E-06
368E-03
1
2008 Older COndinii Ewipmenl
D
125
Consai end Mining Equipmml
1983
006
006
032
3,41E -03
000E-00
9.51E -02
3,43E-03
1
2008 OMer Cansba.6m EgapnaNt
O
125
CmaWCEan and Mining Ewipmenl
1902
001
005
023
353E -03
080E-00
205E -02
254E43
1
2008 OMtt Cananumm Egtipmml
D
125
CenMmclian and Mining Equipmml
1981
ego
003
016
1.21E-03
OWE -00
138E -02
1.22E-03
1
2008 ONer COnAUNm Egtlpmenl
D
125
constructed and Mining F"Innenl
1980
0.02
002
0.12
122E -03
060E -W
3.40E -02
122E43
0
2008 ONer CmaWCBm Equipment
O
125
CmrSeucdm and Mining EWManadl
1929
001
0.02
a'"
0311E-01
OWE -00
242E-02
815E-01
0
2008 ON Cosbumm Egupmand
D
125
Cwtluc4m and Mining E"pmml
1928
0.01
001
am
408E-01
O.WE +W
121E 42
4.11E -W
0
2009 Mer CmsbuaOm Equipmml
O
125
CasbucEm and Mining Ewipmenl
19"
0
0
0.01
122E-01
OWE -W
3.22E0
IY EM
0
2008 mne cane mEgupmml
0
SW
2msbuc4m and Mari Ewipmenl
2008
1.28
CT2
5426
6.00E -01
O.COE -W
1 ,44E -05
600E -01
201
ZW8 mi Cadaud. EWipmml
O
SW
Conindi and Mining Ewipmenl
2002
US
4.52
51.91
521E -01
OW-00
1.62E -05
5.25E -01
190
2008 OBrer CanamncOUn Equipmml
D
500
Cosa an and Mining EWipmml
2006
1.21
424
0,24
539E -01
O.COE -00
1.26E -05
539E -01
129
200001her CanAUNm Egupmanl
D
500
Cme0u6m and Mining Equipment
2005
1.65
395
4532
501E -01
OWE -W
1.84E-05
5.01E -01
166
2008uglier CambucBm Equipment
O
SW
Conabuctim and Mining Ewipmenl
2001
1511
362
41.S9
4ME -01
OWE -W
1.99E -05
461
152
2008 OWtt Ca iduman Eq ipmem
D
Mi
Cmsbuction and Idd,ng Equipment
2003
111
311
Mad
421E -01
OWE -W
LWE-05
421E -01
139
2008 OMer Cursed. Egtlpmm[
O
5W
Conabnctim and Mining EWipmml
2002
1,45
303
34.82
385E -01
OWE -W
2.ME -05
306E -01
128
2008 MN Calamnlim Egnpment
D
SW
CmsbuNm and Mining EWipmml
2001
1.4
2]9
32W
351E 41
O.WE-W
210E�05
3.51E-01
112
200901x. C... EWpmm1
O
Me
Cads and Mining Ewipmenl
2000
1.33
251
28.94
3.19E -01
OWEW
2.46E W
320E -01
IW
2008 OMU Cma0uc8m Egnpini
D
WO
Cmsbuctim and Mining EWPmmI
1age
129
2.3
MU
291
000E -W
2.30E.45
293E -01
92
2008 ONtt CmsbuNm Egnpmml
D
SW
Canis... and lining Ewipmenl
1998
121
2.00
24.1
266E-01
OWE"
212E-05
2.00E -01
88
2"8 OMer Condandm EgWMml
O
500
Caabi and Mining EWipmml
1992
1.16
IN
21.38
236E -01
0.00E-00
1.91E -05
236E -01
28
2008 Oilii,, huci Egapmml
D
SW
Cas0uc9m and Mining Equipmml
INS
1.11
1.00
19."
2.11E -01
0.00E-00
133E-36
2.11E -0I
20
2008 midr COnsbudan Equipment
O
900
CmsbucOm and Mining EquTmml
1995
1.04
1 ,45
16.9
1.85E -01
090E-00
322E -05
195E -01
61
2008 Ofter ConsmmOOn Egnpmait
D
WHO
CmsauvTan and M.al Equipmml
1994
0.92
126
1463
1.61
000E -00
296E -05
1.601
53
2008 ONa CmaNdidn Equipment
O
SW
Cmsbucdon and Mining Equipmml
1993
0.82
1.05
122
133E -01
0.00E -010
241E -05
1.40E -01
44
2008 Mar Cmagani Egipmml
D
500
Cansbuc9m and Man, EWipmml
1992
0.52
058
6.21
2.32E-02
O.00E"
131E -05
2.35E-02
24
2"8 0. CasbucBm Egupmml
O
900
Coa.dan and Mining Equipmml
1991
0.36
039
4"
SOME-to
0.00E -00
9.23E "
503E 42
12
2008 Otlrtr Coabumm Egnpmmt
0
SW
Casbuvaw and Mining Ewipmenl
19"
031
0.31
393
435E -02
0.00E*W
Bo1E -06
4.32E-02
14
2008 OOar Cmseadd. Eptlpmml
D
500
Conni and Mining EwWmmt
1989
026
029
3.39
3.100,02
OWE -00
681E -06
3.21E -02
12
2008 OB CmaTxdm Egnpmml
D
NO
Cmsbud- and Mining EWipmml
1988
022
025
282
3.13EM
000E00
5,26E"
3.14E-02
10
2008 ONerCmAUCOm Equipmml
D
500
Caa.. and Minting EWipmml
1982
0.12
0.19
2.31
2.NE4o
o.WEW
5WEM
265E -02
8
2008 Otlrer Cma0vc8m Egnpmenl
D
WHO
Cmsbuclim and Mining Equipment
19W
0.14
0.16
169
200E-02
0.00E-00
4.55E-06
2.01E-02
2
2008 ONtt COrsbu. Equipmml
D
NO
Cmsb.. and Mining Equipment
1965
0.12
0.13
1.55
1.64E -02
O.WE"
323E-06
1.65E-02
5
2008 ONer Combuc8m Equignmt
D
500
Consouctim and Mining Equipment
1904
0.15
0.16
in
203E44?
0.00E -00
4.91E"
2.OIE@
2
2008 OMM COnsmnmm Egupmml
D
SW
ConsbucOm and Mining EWipment
1981
0.14
0.15
129
1.89EM
0.00E -W
46 "M
190E -02
6
2008 ONer Casennai EWipmml
O
500
Cona,"dan and Mint, Ewipmmt
1982
01
0.11
1.32
LME@
OWEW
341E -"
1.41E-02
5
2008 Otlsr CoaWCBm Egtipmml
D
WO
Canai and Mi., EWipmml
ISM
002
0.02
09
9.49E4M
D.00E -00
232E-06
054E-03
3
2009 air, Cmsauvtim Egupmmt
D
SW
Caabudonand Mining Ewipmmt
1936
005
ON
9.66
T021L 3
0WEW
1.21E -06
2.00E -03
2
2008 OMa Cmaad.on Egnpmenl
D
NO
CmsauNm and Mining EWNmant
19M
0.03
ON
041
4MEL3
,0.00E-00
116E -06
462E -03
2
2008 ONer Cmsauvtim Eypmml
D
500
CmaaucEm and Mining EWipmml
1928
002
OW
021
2.26EL
001
582E -02
222ED3
I
M.
Nee hm6vbaa, MaIdM,na aryNq yvrnanlaab da", Ian. W 1e Hang la Mimi aaauf n IDHmrvad b. M4y o ppNRB_b Oi4aaa
Agricultural Emissions (Los Gatos as a Percent of the County of Santa Clara's Agricultural Land) - Offroad Year 2008.
Populalio
ActWiry
Consumptio
CV Equipment
Fuel Class
MV
n
Ihwrddayl
n
CO2 Exhaust
M20 ExImust 0114 Eebaust
CO2e
CO2e
2008 2-Meel Trxtors
M AgMURUMI Equipment
2008
6.66
3.01
0.67
353E -03
4.92E-0B
4.30E-06
5.15E-03
2
2008 2 -Wneel Traitors
W Agneuitural Equipment
2001
5.75
2.53
05
29TE -03
4.64E-08
4.48E -06
4.50E-03
1
2005 2-Wneel Tradors
G4 Agncuhunl Equipment
2008
1.34
0.59
0.12
692E-04
1.08E-0fi
1.05E -10
1.05E -03
0
2000 2 -gMed Tmdws
M AgnwXunl Equipment
2005
0.3
0.13
0.03
1.57E -04
245E -07
237E 07
238E-04
2008 2 -heel Tradors
GI Agliwmural Equipment
21)(0
541
4.94
2.42
1.111E-02
112E
0
2000 2Meet Tudors
CU Agnwhural Equipment
2057
496
4.52
2.22
-05
820E-00
1.56E 42
5
21(8 2-Meel Tractors
G4 Agnqunumi Equipment
2)06
425
3.87
1.06E -02
120E -05
871E -w
115E -02
5
2058 2 -Wbed Tudors
G4 Agncuhunl EquipmeM
2005
12
11
1.9
9.08E -W
1.03E -05
831E -W
114E -02
4
ZOOS 2,Veeel Tudors
G4 Agnwhural Equipment
2054
0.6
0.55
0.54
2.57E -W
291E-06
235E -W
3.52E -03
1
2008 2 -Wheel Traders
G4 Agricultural Equipment
2003
016
0.14
027
119E -W
1.45E-08
1.18E -06
1 .78E-03
1
2008 2 -11tpeel Tudors
G4 Agr e,ftii it Equipment
2008
0.15
0.13
O.7
3.32E -w
3.75E-07
103E -07
4.54E-0I
0
2008 2 -WOeel Tudors
G4 Agncultural Equipment
2007
0.13
0.12
0.13
623E-04
4.54E -07
5.26E -07
7.75E -01
0
2000 2-Meel Tradors
G4 Agnwhural Equipment
2006
0.11
0.1
0.12
570E-04
4.0E -07
5.50E -07
7.20E-04
0
2058 2 -W lTraders
GI Agnwhural Equipment
2005
0.03
003
0.11
487E-04
182E -07
4 .71E -07
6.16E-04
0
2056 2 -Wneel Traders
34 Agm,uhual Equipment
2004
O.w
001
0.03
1.38E-0I
108E -07
133E -07
134E-0a
0
2008 2 -Wheel Tudors
G4 Apituhunl Equipment
MM
0
0
001
6.911E -05
5.41E -00
687E -W
872E 4)5
0
2008 Agiiw2unl Tudors
M Agirwhund Equipment
2008
024
0.38
0
1 .78E -05
1.39E-08
172E -W
225E -05
0
2000 Agnwnunl Tradors
G4 AgnwRural Equppmenl
2057
9.29
0.44
1.69
1.58E -7
1.20E -W
383E -07
182E-02
5
2050 AgMultunl Tradors
G4 Agnculluml Equipment
2006
0.43
065
205
1.93E-02
1.56E -W
514E -07
188E-02
7
2006 AgMURUMI Tradors
G4 Agricultural EquipmeM
2005
0.46
0.69
3.08
282E-02
394E -W
9.04E -07
295E-02
10
2008 Agncultuml Redone
G4 Agncuhural Equipment
2054
0.47
09
328
299E -02
4.29E -06
1.07E10
3.13E -02
10
2008 Agricultural Traders
G4 Agnwnuml Equipment
2103
0.47
0.7
3.35
305E-02
4,49E Ott
1.20E -W
3.20E-02
11
20110 Agncuhwal TMOM
GI Agnwhural Equipment
2002
O.46
03
3.63
3.05E-02
1.07E 05
887E -06
3.40E -02
11
2000 Agricultural Tradors
Gt Agncultunl Equiymenl
21)(1
0.18
0.89
3.6
3.02E 4)2
106E 45
9.16E -W
3.37E-02
11
2050 AgaultunlTradors
G4 A9neuRunl Equipment
2005
0.15
0.98
3.6
357
3.005 -02
108E -05
849E -06
3.35E 02
11
2050 Agricultural Traders
GI Agncuhurnl Equipment
1999
OA5
0.67
353
2.97E -02
1.05E-05
938E -06
3.31E-02
11
2008 AgricuRual Tudors
W Agnwhural Equipment
1998
0.44
0.67
293E -02
183E -05
180E -05
327E -02
11
21(8 ApiwBu it Traders
G4 Agnwhural Equipment
1997
0.1
0.15
35
289E -w
1.02E -05
1.03E -05
3.23E -02
II
2000 Agikuhural Tudors
G4 Agnwhuml Equipment
1996
0.04
OM
038
682E -W
2.20E-06
2.05E -M
7.34E-03
2
2008 Agricultural Tractors
G4 AgWultural Equipment
1993
0.01
0.01
0.29
2.45E -03
8.18E-07
293E -07
232E-03
1
2008 Agricultural Traders
G4 Agrkununl Equipment
1992
0.02
0.03
086
4.68E-0I
1.84E -7
134E -07
5 .43E-04
0
2006 AgriwlturalTiede.
G4 Agncultual Equipment
1990
0.13
0.2
0.13
1.11E -03
394E -07
4.09E 07
124E-03
0
2008 AgMUltunl Traitors
G4 Agncultunl Equipment
1909
0.12
0.18
1.03
8.56E-03
2.88E-06
333E -06
9.52E-03
3
2000 Agricuhunl Traitors
GI AgncuRUnl Equipment
1988
0.11
0.16
0.93
261E -03
2.57E-06
3 05 W
8.50E-03
3
2000 Agncultual Tractors
G4 Agncultural Equpment
1907
0.09
0.14
085
6.96E -03
235E-08
288E -W
735E -03
3
2008 AgMURUMITncton
W Agiicuhuml Equpment
1986
0.08
0.12
0.72
5.90E -03
1.99E-08
2.49E -W
6.57E-03
2
20116 Agricultural Traitors
G4 Agncultural Equipment
1965
0.07
0.11
0.64
512E -03
1 .76E -06
226E -W
5.01E -03
2
MRI Agncultunl Traders
M Agnwhural Equipment
1984
006
Ogg
0.57
4.61E 43
156E -W
2.05E -06
5.14E-03
2
2058 Agnwhural Traders
G4 Agnwhural Equipment
1983
0.05 -
0.07
0.18
039
3.93E -03
133E-06
1.79E -W
438E-03
1
2008 Agnwlunl T.O.
GI Agnwhural Equipment
1982
0.04
0.06
032
3.18E -03
1.08E -W
1.48E -06
351E-01
1
2008 AgrpUlunl Traders
G4 Agnculluml Equipment
1981
0.03
0.04
257E -W
8.75E -07
1.22E -M
2.87E 43
1
2008 Agncultuul Tndon
G4 Agncultu it Equipment
1980
0.02
MOM
014
189E-03
6ME -07
9.21E-7
2.11E -03
1
2008 Agricultural Tudors
34 Agricultural Equipment
1979
0.02
On
0.19
1.51E-03
5.16E -07
7.53E-07
1.69E -03
1
2008 Agrieultural T.U.
34 Agncultwal Equipment
1978
0.01
0.01
0.13
1811E-03
3.82E -07
5.39E -07
1.18E-03
0
2058 Aer ib ll Tractors
Gt Agncultural Equipment
1977
0
0
0.07
5.67E-01
1.94E 4)7
2.95E -07
6.34E-0I
0
2000 Agriwnual Tudors
G4 Agncuftel Equpment
2008
0.03
0.05
002
1.89E-04
6.47E -08
1 WE -07
2.11E-04
0
2058 AgWukunl Tractors
GO Agnchmal Equipment
2107
0.01
O.w
035
312E -03
2.15E-0T
58W -00
3.29E-03
1
2008 AgreuRUMITndars
W Agncultuml Equipment
2006
O.W
0.09
a
3.91E -03
2.T7E -01
8.39E -0
4.00E-03
1
2108 Agncultural Traders
GI Agncultuel Equpmenl
2005
O.W
O.w
0113
574E 43
221E-07
1.57E -7
5.96E-03
2
20()6 Agiiwhwal Tmdps
34 Agnwhural Equipment
2001
OM
0.1
0.67
6.08E -03
290E -07
1.95E -07
6.33E-03
2
2008 Agiicultunl Tractors
G4 Agnwhural Equipment
2003
0.08
0.1
0.60
6.20EN
8.31E -7
228E -07
647E-03
2
7058 Aglkultunl Tudors
Gd Agrpullural Equipment
2002
0.1%
0.1
0.69
620E -W
1.95EA6
9.05E-07
6.03E-03
2
2058 Agricuhunl Tudors
GO Agneurural Equipment
2001
0.06
0.09
060
6.13E -03
1.93E-0B
9.05E -07
675E-03
2
2058 Agriwnural Traders
W AgneuRUral Equipment
2000
O.W
O.W
060
8.10E -03
1.93E-08
9.13E -07
672E-03
2
Mtli AgncuRnal Traders
G4 Agricultural Equipment
1999
OM
O.w
067
600E-03
1.91E-0B
9.13E -07
663E-03
2
2(106 Agncoltuml Tractors
G4 Agncultural Equipment
1990
0.05
0.09
0.66
5.91E-0J
1.89E-06
9.13E -7
6.55E -03
2
2058 Agin;uhwal Tudors
GI AgntultuMI Equipment
197
0.01
0.02
0.65
5.87E-0J
1.87E-06
9.13E -7
847E -03
2
2000 Agricunwel Traders
of Agnwhural Equipment
1996
0.01
0.01
0.15
1.31E-03
4.03E -97
180E -07
147E -03
0
2000 Agricuhwel Traitors
G4 AgnwlWnl Equpment
1993
0
0
005
4.99E-01
1.50E -07
675E -08
546E-0t
0
2008 Agnwhural Traders
GI Agnwhural Equipment
1992
0
0
001
9.92E-05
3.WEW
139E -08
1.09E-01
0
2008 AgkuhuMl Tradors
G4 Agiicuhuml EquymeM
1990
0.02
0.05
O.w
228E -W
6.7E -Olt
3.21E -08
2.46E-0I
0
2058 Agecultural Trades
34 Agnwhural Equipment
1909
0.02
O.w
0.19
1.74E-03
531E 4)7
2.52E -07
1.91E -w
1
2058 Agricuhumi Tudors
Ga AgnwBunl Equipment
Ism
11.01
0.02
0.17
1.55E 43
4 .75E -7
2.26E -7
1 .70E-03
1
2108 Agnchural Tmdom
G4 Agnwltunl Equipment
1987
001
0.02
0.16
1.41EAS
431E -07
2.10E -7
1.55E -03
1
2008 AgricuhunlTnclors
G4 Agncullunl Equipment
1988
0.01
0.02
0.13
1.20E-03
3.89E -07
1.80E -07
132E -03
0
2058 Agrkununl Tractors
G4 Agncuhuml Equipment
1905
0.01
0.01
012
1.06E -03
3.27E -07
1.61E -07
1.17E -03
0
2008 Agricultural Tractors
G4 Agncultunl Equipment
19&
0.01
0.01
0.1
838E-05
2.911
1.ME -07
103E -03
0
2008 Agneultunl Tractors
GI Agricultural Equipment
1983
0.01
0.01
O.w
7.99E -W
2.46E -07
1.24E -07
8.79E-01
0
2006 Agnp6lural Tradors
G4 Agnwhural Equipment
1902
0.01
0.01
0.07
6.46E-01
2.01E -07
1.01E -07
7.10E-0I
0
2058 AgiiWual Tradors
G4 Agn.Runl Equipment
1981
0
0.01
0.05
523E-0.I
1ME -7
8.26E W
5.75E-0I
0
2058 Agriwltunl Tractors
G4 AgMUhural Equipment
1980
0
0
004
3.84E-
120E -7
8.14E-W
423E-04
0
2058 AgnwRwal Tradors
G4 Agncultuel EquipmeM
1979
0
0
OW
307E -04
9.62E-05
4.98E -W
3.38E-0t
0
2050 AgMununl Tradors
G4 Agnchural Equipment
1978
0
0
002
2.15E -04
6.75E -W
3.51E -W
2.37E-01
0
2058 Agriouhuml Trohers
W Agnwhural Equipment
177
0
0
0.01
1.15E-0t
3.63E-0B
1.90E -0B
1.9E-04
0
2008 Combines
G4 Agnwhural Equpment
2008
OAS
(IM
0
3.81E -05
1.21E-08
6.38E-09
423E-05
0
2008 Combines
Ga Agricultural Equipment
2W7
0.18
0.16
0.42
393E-0S
2.33E -07
8.7E-00
4AOE-03
1
2008 Combines
GI Agnwhural EqupmeM
2006
0..4
0M
0.42
3.91E 43
238E -7
839E0
398E-03
1
2008 Guerin es
Gt Agncuhunl EquipmeM
2005
0.13
OM
003
3.07E-03
3.305 -7
725E -08
318E -03
1
2000 Comte.
G4 AgncuRUnl Equipment
205,
0.12
0.04
021
Z93E -W
3.17E -07
716E-05
3.03E -03
1
2108 Combines
G4 Agnwhural Equipment
2003
0.12
0.04
0.3
Z78E -03
3.03E -7
702E -08
2811E -03
1
2005 Combines
04 Agliwhural Equipment
2W2
0.12
a"
0.3
2.81E 43
7.56E 47
681E -7
2.611E-00
i
2005 Combines
G4 Agriwnural Equipment
2W1
0.12
0.7
0.31
2wEA3
7 .78E-07
6.29E -07
294E-01
1
2008 CamGnes
G4 Agnwhural EquipmeM
2000
ell
0.7
0.32
2.71E-03
7.83E-07
6.41E -07
296E -03
1
2008 Combines
G4 Agnwhural Equipment
1999
007
0.(12
0.3
2.53E-03
7.32E 4)7
6.06E -07
2.77E 43
1
2005 Combines
34 Agricultural Equipment
1905
0.05
0.02
0.17
1.45E -W
420E -07
3.5ZE -07
1.59E -03
1
2106 Combines
W Agnwhural Equipment
1997
O.w
0.01
0.13
1.12E -03
325E 4)7
2 .76E -07
123E-03
0
2108 Combines
GI Agnwhural Equipment
19%
O.w
0.01
0.05
530E-0t
1ME -07
1.12E -7
S.77E4M
0
2106 Combines
G4 Agnwhural Equipment
1995
0.01
0
001
3118E-0I
1.05E -07
8.30E-00
4.13E-04
0
2096 Combines
G4 Ag.Rund Equipment
1994
001
0.00
289EM
7.33E -W
5.83E.W
2.93E-0I
0
2005 Combines
G4 Agneununl Equipment
0
0.02
1.112E -0.4
4.40E -W
3.54E -W
1.76E-0I
0
1%3
001
0
0.01
1.25E-0I
340E -08
2.761
1.36E-04
0
Agricultural Emissions (Los Gatos as a Percent of the County of Santa Clara's Agricultural Land) - Offroad Year 2008
popuhtb
%stwity
Consultant,
CY Equipment
Fuel Class
alY
Ihoursti
at
CO2Ealtau9 N20EMaust CH4Eahaust
COR
CO2e
2000 Combines
G4 Agricultural Equipment
1992
0
0
001
830E-05
226E-08
1.86E -08
904E-05
0
2008 Combines
Be Agnell lEquipment
1991
0
0
0
246E-05
6 .70E-09
5.S6E 09
288E-05
0
2008 Connote.
G4 Agacultural Equipment
20(18
0.1
003
037
3.38E-0J
1.74E -07
483E -0
344E-1J
1
2008 Combines
G4 Agncultural Equipment
2007
0.1
0.03
037
3.36E -03
1.IsE -07
511E -08
3.42E-03
1
2008 Container,
G4 Agricultural Equipment
2086
008
0.03
029
2.69E -03
2ABE 07
4.38E -08
2.72E-03
1
2008 Combnes
G4 Agmugural Equipment
2005
0.07
0.03
027
2.52E43
2.38E -07
4.44E -08
2.60E-03
1
2008 Gemi inas
Be Agiiwtlural Equipment
2004
0.07
0.02
0.26
239EN
2.28E -07
4AM -Olt
2.96E-03
1
abbe Combines
G4 Agncultural Equipment
41103
0.01
002
025
2.2 %O3
585E-07
3.08E -07
2A0 -03
1
2008 Combines
G4 Agnweural Equipment
2002
007
0.02
025
2.31E -03
582E -07
3.18E -07
250E -03
1
2008 Combines
G4 A,.nu.1 Equipment
2001
0.07
0.02
028
2.33E -03
5.86E -07
321E -07
2.52E -03
1
2008 Combines
G4 Agricultural Equipment
2000
006
0.02
014
2.17E -03
5.48E-0]
301E -07
2.35E 43
1
2000 Combines
04 Agricultural Equipment
1999
0.04
0.01
0.14
125E -03
3.14E-07
113E -07
1.35E-0J
0
2000 Combines
Gt Agriculural Equipment
1990
0.03
0.01
0.11
9.67E-04
2.44E -07
125E -07
1.05E-03
0
2000 Combines
GI Agritaltu.l Equipment
1997
0.01
0
0.05
4.56E-04
108E -07
5.41E -08
4.90E-04
0
2008 Combines
G4 Agricultural Equipment
1996
001
0
004
3.34E-0I
192E -08
390E-00
360E-04
0
2000 Combnes
G4 Agricultural Equpment
1995
001
0
003
2.32E-04
5 49
277E-0B
2A9E-04
0
2000 Combines
G4 Agricultural Equipment
1994
0
0
002
1.39E-04
3.30E -Olt
167E-00
1.50E-04
0
2000 Combines
Gt Agricultural Equipment
1993
0
0
001
107E -04
2.55E -0
1.29E -08
1.16104
0
2008 Combines
Go Agricultural Equipment
1992
0
0
001
7.14E -OS
1.70E -08
861E -bb
7.69E-05
0
2008 Combines
G4 Agricultural Equipment
1991
0
0
0
2.12E -OS
5.03E-09
2.56E -09
228E-05
0
2008 Ct,mdnes
G4 Agrpulturnt Equipment
2008
0.02
0.01
008
710E -04
61
1.01E -Olt
].3]1-04
0
20118 Combines
G4 Agricultural Equipment
2007
0.02
0.01
008
7.13E-04
810E-00
1.0.7E-0e
7.33E-04
0
2008 Combines
G4 Agricultural Equipment
2008
0.01
0
0.06
5.61E-04
5.00E-08
9 %E -09
5.77E-04
0
2008 Combines
G4 Agncultual Equipment
2005
0.01
0
006
5.75E-04
4.81E-08
9.70E -09
5.50E-04
0
2008 Combines
04 Agkultual Equipment
2004
001
0
am
508E-0I
4.60E-00
9.76E -09
522E-04
0
2008 Combines
Bo Agricultural Equipment
2003
0.01
0
0.05
477E-04
61
3.31E -Olt
4.99E-04
0
Z00B Combines
G4 Agrpultural Equipment
2002
O.Ot
0
005
4.91E-04
8.88E -08
4.61E -M
5.19E-04
0
200B Combnes
G4 Agricultural Equipment
2001
0.01
O
O S
4.94E -04
105E -07
582E-0e
520E-04
0
9108 Combines
G4 Agricultural Equipment
2000
001
0
005
461104
1.11E -07
557E -Olt
4.97E-04
0
2008 Combines
G4 Agricultural Equipment
1999
0.01
0
0.03
265104
61
3.78E -013
2.85E-09
0
2000 Combines
G4 Agricultural Equipment
1998
001
0
0.02
205E -04
4.92E -011
2.91E -03
221E-04
0
2008 Combines
Gd AgriwOUml Equipment
1997
0
0
0.01
987E -05
2.10E-08
1.18EM
1.04E-0t
0
abbe Combines
Be, Agricultural Equipment
1996
0
0
001
7.09E-05
160E -08
869109
7.61EQ5
0
2000 Combines
Gl Agricultural Equipment
1995
0
0
0.01
492E-05
1.11E-08
605109
5.28E-05
0
2000 Combines
G4 Agricultural Equipment
1994
0
0
0
295E-05
666E-09
36,11bb
3.17E-05
0
2000 Combines
6t Agnwnural Equipment
1993
0
0
0
228105
5.15E -09
282EM
244E-05
0
2008 Combines
G• Agricultural Equipment
1992
0
G
0
152E-05
3.43E -M
1.88E -09
1.63E-05
0
3000 Combines
G4 Agricultural Equipment
1991
0
0
0
4.49E-06
1.02E -09
5.59E-10
4.82E-06
0
2008 Eakin
G4 Agricultural Equipment
2008
0M
0.16
031
2.74E -03
4.32E -07
150E -07
2.886-03
1
2008 fiakrs
G4 Agricultural Equipment
2007
1.07
02
0.30
3.33E-03
5.27E-0]
185E -07
3.50E-03
1
2008 Bak.
G4 Agricultural Equipment
2008
1.57
029
0.%
488E -03
8.56E-07
2.92E -07
5.15E -03
2
2008 Balers
04 Agnoultual Equipment
2005
1.67
031
0.59
5P1U9
9.19E -07
3.14E -07
5A]E43
2
2008 Balers
G4 Andre lEquipment
2004
1.7
032
061
518E-03
9.48E -07
3.25E 07
558E 43
2
2078 Balers
G4 Agricultural Equipment
2003
17
0.32
068
5.28E-03
233E 06
167E -06
6.03E-03
2
2001 Balers
G4 Agncunural Equipment
2002
1.60
0.31
0.67
5.22E-03
2.30E-06
168E-06
5.9l
2
2108 Balers
G4 Agncultual Equipment
2001
1.67
0.31
0.67
5.19E-03
2.29E-06
1.65E -bb
5.93EY3
2
2008 Bale.
C4 Agrpultural Equipment
2000
1.65
031
B66
513E-03
2.26E-08
1.65E -06
586E-03
2
2008 Balers
G4 Agncularal Equpmenl
1999
163
0.3
065
5.06E -03
223E-06
1.64E -06
5 .7aE 03
2
2008 sale.
W Agricultural Equipment
1990
161
0.3
061
5.00E -03
220E -06
163108
5.71E-03
2
2008 Bak.
G4 Agricultural Equipment
1997
037
0.07
0.14
1.14E -03
4.74E 07
320E -07
1.30E-03
0
2000 Balers
G4 Agncultual Equipment
1998
0.14
0.03
0.05
424E-04
1.76E -07
1.19E -07
4.81E-04
0
2000 Balers
G4 Agricultural Equipment
1993
0.03
001
0.01
8ME-05
3.50E-00
2AK -08
958E-05
0
2008 Balers
G4 Agricultural Equipment
1992
01
001
0.02
193E-04
7.99E-08
5.57E-00
219E-04
0
2008 Bale.
G4 Agricultural Equipment
1990
0.44
009
018
1.48E-03
813E -07
4.39E -07
168E -03
1
2008 Bale.
Be Agnculural Equipment
1989
OA3
0.00
0.16
1.82E-03
SAME -07
3.90E -07
1.50E-03
0
2078 Baler
Be Agricultural Equipment
1988
0.39
0.07
0.15
1.20E -03
4.99E -07
357E -07
1.37E -03
0
2078 Balers
Be Agncutaral Equipment
1907
0.33
0.08
0.13
1.02E-03
4.23E -07
305E -0]
1.16E -03
0
2008 Bell
Be Agncultural Equipment
1986
029
0.05
0.11
9.02E-04
3.74E -07
2.71E -07
1.02E -03
0
2008 sale.
G4 AgriwOmal Equipment
1985
0.26
am
0.1
TSME04
331E -07
2.41E -07
905E-04
0
2008 Bales
G4 Agneuri Equipment
1984
022
0.04
008
6.80604
282E-0]
2.07E -07
172E-04
0
2000 Balers
G4 Agncultural Equipment
1983
018
0.03
007
5.49E -M
228E -07
1.60E -07
623E -04
0
2008 Bak.
G4 Agricultural Equipment
1982
014
0.03
006
4.45E-04
1.05E -07
1.37E-07
505E-04
0
2008 Balers
G4 Agnwltual Equipment
1951
0.11
am
004
321E -04
1.36E -07
1.01E -07
371E-04
0
2000 Balers
G! Agrioulual Equipment
1980
0.08
0.02
003
262E-0t
1.09E -07
8.16E -Olt
2.97E-04
0
2000 Balers
Ct Agrpultual Equipment
1979
006
001
0.02
1.83E-04
7.61E-08
5.75E -0
208104
0
2000 Bale.
G4 Agricultural Equipment
1978
0.03
0.01
0.01
9.B1E -05
000E-08
3.10E -Olt
1.11E-04
0
2078 Balers
G4 AgnGUUral Equipment
1977
0.01
0
0
3.27E -05
136E -08
1.04E -Olt
371E -05
0
2078 Balers
G4 Agricultural Equipment
2000
045
0.08
09
2.53E -03
2.14E -07
SME -08
280E 43
1
2078 Balers
G4 Agricultural Equipment
2007
0.55
0.1
033
3.08E -03
2.63E -07
8.73E -08
3.16E -03
1
20118 Balers
G4 Agnsultural Equipment
2008
0.8
0.15
BAB
451E -03
6.89E -07
1.01E -07
4.73E -03
2
21108 Balers
G4 Agncultural Equpment
2005
0.15
016
0.51
418E -03
7.33E -07
1.10E -07
5.01E 43
2
2001 Balers
G4 Agrpultural Equipment
2004
0.87
0.16
052
488E -03
251E -07
1.14E -07
5.12E 43
2
2008 Bakes
G4 Agricultural Equipment
2003
087
0.16
057
4.88E-03
2.02E -M
1.09106
553E -03
2
2008 Balers
G4 Agricultural Equipment
2002
086
0.16
0%
4.82E -03
200E-06
100E-06
5.47EA
2
2000 Bale.
Be Agricultural Equipment
2001
0.86
0.16
OM
4.84103
1.99E-06
109E-06
544E -03
2
2008 Balers
G4 Agricultural Equipment
2000
0.85
BAB
055
474E 4]
1.96E-06
1Mi
5.37E -03
2
2000 Balers
G4 Agrpultual Equipment
1999
0.83
018
054
460E -03
1.94E-06
107E -06
5.30E -03
2
900 Balers
Be Agmultural Equipment
1990
064
0.15
054
482E -03
1.92E -06
107E -06
5.24E-03
2
2000 Balers
W Agricultural Equipment
1997
0.19
0.04
012
1.08E -03
412E -07
2.09E -07
119E -03
0
2008 Bak.
G4 Agricultural Equipment
1996
0.07
0.01
000
3.92E -04
1.53E -07
201E -013
441E-04
0
2(00 Bak.
G4 Agncultural Equipment
1993
001
0
001
7.01E -05
3.04E -Olt
1.59108
8.78E -05
0
908 sakrs
G4 Agricultural Equipment
1992
003
0.01
002
1.75104
6.94E -Olt
361E -08
207E-04
0
2008 Bak.
G4 Agricultural Equpment
1990
0.24
0.05
0.16
1.37E -03
5.33E -07
281E -07
1.54E-03
1
2071 Balers
G4 Agricultural Equipment
1989
0.22
0Be
0.14
1T1E -03
4.76E -07
2 %E -07
1.37E 43
0
2008 Balers
GI AmeMurel Equipment
1988
02
0.04
013
1.11E -03
434E -07
2.33E -07
1.25E-03
0
2008 Bate.
G4 Agricultural Equipment
1987
0.17
0.03
011
9.43E-04
380E 47
1.99E -07
108E-03
0
9108 Were
G4 Agricultural Equipment
19%
015
0.03
0.1
8.34E-0t
32 11E-07
1.77E -07
939E-04
0
2003 Bale.
G4 Agricultural Equpment
1985
013
0.02
0.00
7.36E-04
2.BBE -07
1%E -07
8.30E-01
0
2008 Balers
G4 Aaiwltual Equipment
1984
0.11
002
007
629E -04
2.45E-07
1.35E 07
108E-01
0
2007 Eaters
Gt Agricultural Equipment
1983
0.09
002
0.06
SOBE-04
198E -07
1.10E 07
5.72E-0t
0
Agricultural Emissions (Los Gatos as a Percent of the County of Santa Clara's Agricultural Land) - Offroad Year 2008
CY Equipment
Fuel Class
MY
populetlw
n
OcMXy
(Ogupli
Consump6o
CO2EUMUM H2OMmust CH4Eahaust CO2
-
CO2
WIN Ni
GI Agncultual Equipment
1982
0.97
0.01
0.05
4.11E-0l
1.601
8.061
4.63E-04
0
2000 Balers
G4 Agncuaual Equipments
1981
ass
0.01
0.03
3AM414
1.18E -07
6.63E -00
3.40E-04
0
2005 Balers
G4 Agricueuml Equipment
ism
0.04
001
OM
242E-04
9.44E-W
5.34E -08
272E-04
0
2008 Balers
G4 Agnwltunt Equipment
1979
0.03
001
0.02
1.89E-04
6.61E-0B
3.76E -08
1
0
2008 Balers
G4 Agnwitural Equipment
1970
1
0
001
Si
3.54E-0B
203E 08
-91E4M
1 OZE-04
0
2008 Balers
W AgnwBUal Equ'pmenl
194
0.01
0
0
3.02E -05
1.10E -W
(1109
3.40E-05
0
2000 Agncullual Mowers
GA Agriwitunl Equipment
miss
1.56
092
035
1.87E-03
1.84E -W
1.16E W
226E -03
1
2008 Agriwrural Movers
G4 AgncuXual Equipments
2007
1.83
0.9
0.34
1.64E 43
1.97E-06
1.35E-06
228E-03
1
NW Agnwlunl Movers
G4 AgRUllural Equipment
2006
1.97
0.97
0.37
1YIE-0i
225E-06
1.61
2.50E-03
1
2008 AgnwBunl Mowers
34 Agncultual Equipment
2005
1.65
0.81
021
1.48E-03
1.11BE -118
1.35E -06
2.09E-03
1
2008 Agncuptral Mowers
G4 Agrkultual Equipment
2004
1.58
0.78
0.3
1.42E-03
1.01E-06
1.30E -W
2.01
1
2008 Agncultuml Movers
34 AgriwXunt Equipment
2003
1.49
0 .74
018
1.31E -03
1.71E -05
4NE-6
1.90E -03
1
2008 Agrlems al Mayers
GO Agnwru el Equipment
2002
1.37
0.68
0.32
123E -03
121E-06
2.69E-06
1.46E -03
1
2008 AgnwBual Mayers
G4 Agri ftuml Equipment
Ni
1.3
0.64
0.3
1.161
1.14E-06
254E -06
1.57E -03
1
NOR Agr ftuml Mowers
G4 Agnii Equipment
2000
0.51
025
01
460E-04
4.52E -07
1.01E-06
822E-01
0
2008 AgncuOUml Mowers
W Asr urel Equipment
INS
0.38
0.19
OM
342E-04
3351
7.47E 07
462E-04
0
2008 Agmultuml Mowers
G4 Aiiii.m it Equipment
1999
DA
02
ON
3.82E-01
3.55E -07
791E 07
488E-04
0
miss Agricultural Mowers
G4 Agnudimal Equipment
1997
0.19
0.1
ON
1 .74E-04
1.71E -07
3.61E-07
2.35E-04
0
2000 Agnculturel Movers
G4 AgncuXural Equpmets
1996
0.13
0.07
ON
121E -04
1.15E-07
2.90E-0]
1.72E-04
0
2000 AgrlcuXUral M..
G4 Agncullual Equipment
INS
0.00
0.04
0.02
723E-05
8.13E-08
1.47E -07
1.01E-04
0
WIN A9ricullunl Moment
G4 AgncuXUral Equipment
1994
ON
0.02
0.01
3.50E -05
3.94E -0,11
7.12E -00
4.81
0
2008 Ag.lual Mowers
G4 AgrkuItural EWipment
1993
0.01
O.UI
0
120E-05
1.35E-0B
2.45E-0
1.67E -05
0
2008 Agrpu8ua1 Mowers
G4 Agnw6unl Equipment
2008
1.52
0 .75
068
307E-03
222E-0fi
226E-06
381E -03
1
2008 Agreteual Movers
04 Agnwltual Equipment
2007
1.5
0.74
0.65
3A1
238E-06
2 U W
3.82E-03
1
2000 Agr uml Masers
G4 Agricultural Equipment
2006
1.61
0.8
0.7
3151
2.72E-06
3.14E 06
4.16E-03
1
2008 Agrkuaunl Menem
G4 Ag6cu9mal Equipment
2005
1.35
0.67
0.59
2 .72E -03
228E-06
263E -06
346E -03
1
2DW Agricultural Mowers
G4 Ag6cuXural Equipment
N04
129
0.64
0.55
2.61E-03
2.19E-06
2.53E -06
335E-03
1
mi Agriwlunl Mowers
G4 Agncuftmal Equipment
2003
122 -
0.6
0.53
2.47E -03
263E -06
238E -06
3.16E -03
1
2638 AgnwBUal Mowers
G4 Agircultuml Equipment
2002
1.12
0.55
ON
21GE -03
1.36E -05
422E -06
2
1
2630 AgriwBUral Movers
G4 Agriwllurts Equipment
2001
IN
0.52
0.53
214E-03
129E -06
3.99E-06
.781
263E -03
1
2000 AgncuBunl Movers
G4 Agricultural Equipment
2000
0.42
021
021
847E-0I
Si
1.58E OR
1.04EN
0
2000 AgncusUal Mowers
G4 Agr Rusi Equipment
INS
0.31
0.15
0.16
6.30E-01
3.00E -97
1.17EW
772E-04
0
2008 Ag.sural Mayers
GI Agnwhunl Equipment
ING
0.33 -
0.18
0.17
6.97E-01
401
124E-06
8.18E-01
0
2009 Agnicull MMayers
G4 AgnwXual Equipment
1907
0.16
0.08
0.07
3.21E-04
1.931
5.97E-07
3.93E-01
0
2008 Ag1ruXunl MOwea
G4 A9.1h iEquipment
INS
0.11
0.05
0.07
222E-04
1.90E 407
4.73E -07
288E-04
0
2008 Agriw2unl Mower
G4 AgnwBund Equipment
INS
0.07
0.03
OA3
1.33E-0I
1.01E -07
2.40E -07
1.691
0
2000 Agncurural Movers
G4 Agricultural Equipment
1994
0.03
0.02
1
6.44E-05
4.80E -08
1.16E -07
8.19E-05
0
2008 Agmulual Mowers
G4 Asr ilursl Equipment
1993
0.01
001
001
221E-05
1.68E -08
4.001.03
2.02E -05
0
miss Sprayers
G4 Agricultural Equipment
2008
13.99
3.76
011
3.56E-03
5.16E-06
3.631
Si
2
2008 Sproment-
G4 AgriwXural Equipment
2007
13.11
3.52
051
3.31E-03
531E-06
4.31E -06
- 5.07E-03
2
2008 Spints.
G4 A94w1tural Equpmenl
2006
1226
3.3
053
3.12E -03
5.37E-06
4.88E -06
685E-03
2
2008 Spinners
G4 Agnwllural Equipment
2005
10.32
2.78
OH
2.63E -03
4.51E 416
3.97E -06
4.12E-03
1
2008 Spayers
G4 Agriwltunl Equipment
2004
325
ON
0.14
829E-04
IASE-06
125E -6
1.30E -03
0
2000 Spi
GI Aisweunl Equipment
2003
1.97
0.53
ON
5.01E-04
8.66E -07
7.57E -07
7.85E-04
0
2006 spends
G4 AgncuXunl Equipment
2002
1.03
028
001
261E-01
9.51E -07
3.951
409E-0I
0
mW sprayers
G4 Agrpultunl Equipment
2001
0.26
0.07
002
6.55E-05
9.38E-00
232E -07
9.91E-05
0
miss Sprayers
W Agticultund EWipment
2W0
ON
0.25
ON
4.13E-04
4.53E -07
261
559E-0I
0
2008 sprayers
G4 Agnw8ural Equipment
2007
0.94
Dill
0.09
4.17E-04
4.61E -07
2.94E -07
5.73E-04
0
NOB Sprayers
GI Agriw6unl Equipment
2005
1.15
0.31
0.11
5.12E-04
6.23E -07
3.96E-07
7.13E-01
0
2000 Sprayers
GI Agnwltural Equipment
2005
1.51
041
0.14
6.73E-04
8.56E -07
5.66E -07
950E-01
0
2638 Strayers
G4 Agriwltumi Equipment
2004
1.63
OM
OAS
726E-01
9.62E-97
6.59E -07
1.44E-03
0
2000 Sprayers
G4 Agricultural Equipment
2003
1.85
0.M
0.15
7.34E-04
9.76E -07
6.72E -07
1.05E -03
0
2008 Streamers
G4 Agncui Equipment
2002
1.58
0.42
0.18
7.02E -04
7.19E -07
1.53E-06
957E-04
0
2108 Sprayers
G4 Agnmitual Equipment
2001
1.S4
0.41
0.18
6.117E-04
7.01E -07
1.50E -1
927E-01
0
NOB Sprayers
G4 AgriwOual Eqn anent
2000
1.32
0.38
OAS
5.89E-01
6.04E -07
1.29E -06
8.01E-04
0
2008 Spayers
G4 AgnwBUal Equipment
1999
1.3
0.35
0.15
5.81E-01
5.951
1.27E -06
7.92E-04
0
mm swayers
G4 Agncuwml Equipment
ism
127
0.34
0.15
5.611
5.79E -07
1.23E -06
7.71E-01
0
2630 Sprayers
G4 Agnwllunl Equpmets
1997
(11
0.63
ON
1.56E-04
1.63E -07
3.41E -07
213E-04
0
2638 Sprayers
GA Agn[ultural Equipment
1 N
0.25
0.07
O.D3
1.13E-04
IAX -07
2.72E -07
193E-01
a
2008 Sprsye a
G4 Agricultural Equipment
INS
0.07
0.02
0.01
324E-05
380E-08
6.59E-08
4.55E-05
0
2008 Sprsyers
G4 Agricultural Equipment
1993
0.05
0.01
0.01
2.33E-05
2 .73E-08
4.74E -W
327E-05
0
2008 Sprayers
G4 Agricultural Equipment
1992
0.06
0.02
0.01
2.78E-05
3.27E -00
5.61
192E-05
0
NW Sp.,m
G4 AgnwXUnl Equipment
1991
002
0
0
B.WE -W
9.51
1.65E-0B
1.14E-5
0
WN Sprayers
G4 Agnw2unl Equipment
1990
0.34
O.W
004
1.51E-0I
1.71E -07
3.WE -07
212E-04
0
2630 sprayers
G4 AgrkuXurs Equipment
1989
0.31
0.63
004
1.37E-0t
1.61E -07
2.79E -97
1.93E-04
0
2006 Estate.
G4 Agriwltural Equipment
ism
025
0.07
OW
1.11E-04
1.31E -07
228E -07
1.56E-04
0
2000 BMaKre
64 AgnwXUral Equipment
1907
023
0.06
003
1.02E-0I
110E -07
208E-97
1.44E-04
0
2008 Sprayers
W Agripustral Equipment
INS
0.19
ON
0.02
8.38E-05
9.85E-08
1.71E -07
1.16E-04
0
2638 Sprayers
G4 Agricultural Equipment
I985
0.16
0.01
0.02
7.01E-05
023E-63
1.43E -07
9.86E-05
0
NOB Sprayers
GI Agricultural Equipment
1984
0.13
O.W
0.01
5.63E -W
6.62E-63
1.15E -07
793E-05
0
AN Sprayers
34 Agnw8ural Equipment
1983
0.1
O.W
0.01
4.57E-63
5.37E-00
91
1
0
WIN 8pasers
G4 Agricultural Equipment
1982
0.07
Ism
0.01
3.14E-05
3.69E -08
640E-63
442E-05
0
NOB Sprier,
G4 Agrkultual Equipment
101
0.05
0.01
0.01
228E-05
269E-08
4.65E-0B
311E -05
0
2008 Sprayers
G4 Agnw6unl Equipment
ism
0.03
0.01
0
127E-05
1.49E-08
2.59E -08
1.79E-05
0
2000 Strayers
G4 Agnwpml Equipment
1979
0.01
0
0
3.81E-06
4.48E -9
7.76E -09
5.36E44
0
2000 Sprayers
out Agncvllural Equipment
2008
2.4
a"
0.55
2.59EN
1.80E-63
1.75E -06
3.19E-03
1
NW Sprayers
GO Agnwryual Equipment
2007
242
0.65
0.56
2.62E-03
1.92E-63
1.95E -05
3,26E-03
1
2008 Sprayers
G4 Agneui Equipment
2063
2.97
DA
0.69
322E -03
2.48E-06
2.63E -06
4.01E -03
1
2063 Sprayers
W Agri fti Equipment
2005
3.91
1.63
091
423E -03
341E-06
376E-06
5.36E-03
2
moll Sprayers
G4 Agricultural Equipment
2004
412
1.13
063
4.56E -03
353E-06
437E -06
5.51E-03
2
2008 Sprayers
G4 Agn[uXural Equipment
203
4.26
1.15
OW
4.81E-03
3.89E-06
448E -06
5.91E-03
2
2000 Sprayers
G4 Agncuntral Equipment
2W2
4.63
1.1
1.1
4.41E-03
2.88E-06
622E 46
5.41E-03
2
2000 Sprayers
G4 AgrpuXural Equipment
2631
3.99
1.07
IN
4.32E-0S
2.62E-06
8.05E-6
530E-03
2
2W5 strayers
G4 Agnculunl Equipment
2000
342
0.92
0.92
3 .70E -03
225E -6
6.963-06
4SSE -03
2
2638 Sprayers
W Agninui Equipment
INS
337
0.91
0.91
365E -03
222E-08
6.80E -O6
4.48E-03
1
24))B sprayers
G4 Agnwruml Equipment
1 N
328
0.88
089
3.65E-03
216E-06
6.62E-06
436E -0.1
1
N08 sprayers
G4 Agnweual Equipment
1997
1
021
023
9.82E-01
597E -07
1.83E -06
121E-03
0
2000 Sprayer
G4 AgncuXunl Equipment
19%
0.66
0.18
021
7.13E-04
Si
152E-63
925E-04
0
2008 Sprayers
Out Agricullual Equipment
INS
0.19
0.63
0.05
2.03E-04
1.56E-0)
3.67E -07
2.59E-04
0
2008 Sprayers
G4 Agnculual Equipment
1993
0.14
0.63
ON
1.46E-01
1.12E -07
2.64E -07
t.&SE -04
0
Agricultural Emissions (Los Gatos as a Percent of the County of Santa Clara's Agricultural Land) - Offroad Year 2008.
PopuNW MNm Consumptlo
2008 swayers
W Agriculu it EquiM.M
1991
0.05
0.01
001
508E -05
388E-08
9.17E-08
&47E -5
2008 Sprayers
W Agrputluml Equipment
1990
0.88
024
025
9.49E-0e
725E -07
1.21E-06
1.21E -03
2008 Spayem
W AgrcuXural Equipment
1989
0.8
0.21
0.22
8.61E-04
6.59E -07
1.56E -M
1.10E -03
2008 sprayers
W Agmullural Equpmenl
1900
0.65
0.17
0.18
6.99E-04
5.34E -07
126E -W
8.91EI
2008 Sprayers
W Agrcutlural Equipmenl
1907
0.59
OAS
0.17
6.41E-04
4.80E -07
1.16E -W
8.17E-04
T000 Sprayers
W Agncutlund Equipment
19%
0.49
0.13
OA4
526E-0I
LOiE -9
9.51E -07
671E-0t
2000 Swayers
W Agrc ftpml Equipment
1985
041
0.11
0.11
4.40E-04
3.37E -07
7.95E -07
5.61E-04
2000 Spayers
G4 AOncultuml Equipment
1964
033
0.09
0.09
3.54E-0e
2.71E -07
6.40E -07
4.51E-04
2008 Sprayers
G4 Agmultural Equipment
1903
0.27
0.07
0.07
2.87E -W
220E -07
5.19E 07
3.66E-04
2008 sprayers
G4 Agrcutlural Equipment
1982
0.18
0.05
0.05
1.97E -M
1.51E -07
3.57E W
2.52E-0t
2008 Sprayers
G4 AgiicuXuml Equipment
1981
0.13
0.01
ON
1.44E44
110E 47
2.59E -07
1.83E-0I
2008 swayers
W Agmuluml Equipment
1900
007
0.02
002
7.97E -05
6.10E-08
144E -07
102E-04
2009 sprayers
W Agrcultunal Equipment
1979
002
0.01
0.01
2.39E -05
1.83E-08
432E -W
105E-05
2000 Sprayers
W Agrculluml Equipment
2008
0.17
001
006
5.20E-0e
8.82E 48
3.02E -W
5ASE-04
2008 Sprayers
W Agrcutlural Equipment
21107
02
ON
0.07
6.32E-04
1.08E -07
3.73E -W
6.66E-00
2008 Sprayers
W Agrwtlural Equipment
2000
03
0.07
0.11
9.27E-01
1.76E -07
5.59E -W
9.82E-01
2008 Swayers
W AgnwXuml Equipment
2005
0.31
007
011
982E -04
169E -07
603E -08
101E -03
2008 sprayers
W A9rpumal Equipment
2000
en
007
012
100E -03
105E 4)7
610E -W
1.06E 413
2008 Sprayers
G4 AgriwXumi Equipment
2003
0.32
0.07
0.13
1.00E 4)3
4.75E -07
3.19E -07
1.16E-03
2008 Spmyers
G4 AgnwXural Equipment
2002
0.32
0.9
0.13
9.90E -W
469E -07
3.17E -9
1.14E -03
2008 Sprayers
G4 AgmuBUral Equipment
2001
0.32
0.07
0.13
9.85E-01
467E -07
3.18E07
1.14E -03
2WO Sprayers
W Agncultuml Equipment
2000
031
0.07
013
9.73E-04
461E -07
3.17E 4)7
1.12E -3
2008 sprayers
W Agncutluml Equipment
1999
031
0.07
012
900E-01
4.55E -07
315E -07
1.11E-03
2008 Sprayers
G4 Ayru ftml Equipment
Me
0.3
0.07
0.12
040E-04
4.50E -07
314E -07
109E-03
2000 sprayers
G4 AgncuXUml Equipment
1997
0.07
0.02
003
2.17E-04
9.67E -08
8.18E -M
248E-01
2000 Spmyen
W Agrcutlural Equipment
1996
0.03
0.01
0.01
0.05E 4)5
3.59E -08
230E -W
921E-05
2008 sprayers
G4 Agrcutlural Equipment
1993
0.01
0
0
1.60E -05
7.14E-09
169E -0
1.83E-05
2000 Sprayers
G4 AgrcuXural Equipment
1992
0.01
0
0
388E -M
163E-0B
100E -W
4.19E -05
2008 Sprayers
G4 AgiicuXuni Equipment
1990
009
0.02
006
281E-4
125107
641E-8
321E-04
2000 sprayers
G4 AgricuXuml Equipment
1989
008
0.02
003
251E -W
1.12E -07
7.57E.0
207Ed
2108 sprayers
G4 A9riwllural Equipment
1988
0.07
0.02
003
228E-04
1.02E -07
6.94E-0B
201E-04
2008 Sprayers
W AgruuXural Equipment
1987
0.06
0.01
0.02
1.94E-04
8.84E-00
5.93E -00
222E-0e
2000 Swayers
W Agrcultual Equipment
1986
0.05
001
0.02
121E-04
7.84E-00
528E-08
1.96E-0t
2008 Swayers
04 Agnw8ursl Equipmenl
1985
0.05
001
002
1.51E-04
826E-00
471E -08
1.73E-0I
2008 Sprayers
G4 AgriwXural Equipment
1981
001
0.01
002
129E414
5 .76E -0e
4WE-08
1.48EM
2008 Sprayers
G4 Agncuftal Equipment
1983
0.03
0.01
001
1.00E -04
4.66E -W
329E -W
1.19E-04
2008 Sprayers
04 Agrcutlural Equipment
1902
0.0
0.01
001
8.44E -M
377E -00
2.68E W
9.67E -05
2008 Sprayers
G4 Agncutlural Equipment
1901
0.02
0
001
621E -0
277E-00
1.98E -M
7.11E -05
2008 Sprayers
G4 Agrcutlural Equipment
1900
0.02
0
001
497E -05
222E -8
160E -I
5.89E 4)5
2008 sprayers
G4 AgnwtlumIEquipment
1979
001
0
0
348E -05
1.55E -W
113E -W
398E-05
2108 swayers
34 Agrculluml Equipment
1978
001
0
0
1.86E -05
8.32E -00
&WE M
2.13E 45
2008 Speyer.
04 AgA.RUml Equipment
197
0
0
0
621E-06
2.77E-09
2.00E -09
7.11E-06
2008 Spaym.
W AgrwXursl Equipment
2008
028
O.W
0.19
IJSE-03
1.53E -07
3.05E-08
1.83E-03
2000 sprayers
W Agm,um.1 Equipment
2007
0.34
0107
023
217Em
1.89E -7
478E -08
223E-03
2008 Sprayers
W AgrcuXural Equipment
2000
0.5
0.11
011
3.18E -3
4.94E -07
723E-08
331E-03
2000 sprayers
W Agnwiluml EqupmeM
2005
0.53
0.12
0.36
1.37E -03
527E -07
784E 48
351E -03
2000 sprayers
W Agnwtluml Equipment
2004
0.54
01
0.37
3.44E -W
640E -07
8.18E -00
161E49
2008 Sprayers
W Agra ftuml Equipment
2003
0.54
0.12
04
3.44E -W
145E-06
7.74E-07
3.91E -03
2008 sprayers
G4 AgnwBUral Equipment
2002
0.53
0.12
04
340E -W
143E -W
771E -07
388E 43
2000 Sprayers
W Agrcutlural Equipment
2001
0.53
0.12
039
338E -03
1.43E-00
7.73E -9
361E -03
2008 Sprayers
W AgrcuXural Equipment
2000
0.52
0.12
039
&ME-M
1.41E -M
720E -07
379E-03
21)08 Swayers
64 Agrcutlural Equipment
1999
0.52
0.11
038
3.30E -03
1.39E-06
7.66E 47
3.74E-03
2008 spmyem
W Agrcutlural Equipment
1998
0.51
0.11
038
326E -03
1.37E-06
7.63E 47
3.70E-03
2008 Sprayers
W Agncultual Equipment
1997
0.12
0.00
009
7.48E-04
295E -07
1.50E -07
8.40E-04
2008 Sprayers
W AgrcuXuml Equipment
1998
0.00
001
003
277E -4
1.09E -7
559E-0B
3.12E-04
2008 Swayers
W AgnwXuil Equipment
1900
001
0
001
5.50E -0S
210E-08
114E-0e
8.20E-05
2008 Sprayers
W AgrcuXural Equipment
1992
002
0
0.01
116E-04
490E -W
262E 4)e
IAVRM
2008 sprayers
G4 Agrcutlural Equpmenl
1990
0.15
0.03
0.11
900E -W
382E -07
2.00E9
1.09E49
2008 Swayers
34 Agrcutlural Equpmenl
1989
0.14
0.03
0.1
8.61E -W
341E -9
1.84E9
9 .71E-00
2008 Spmyurs
G4 Agrcutlural Equipment
1988
0.12
OM
009
781E -W
311E -07
1.69E -07
0.84EM
2008 Sprayers
04 Agammel Equpmenl
1987
0.1
0.02
0M
685E -04
200E 47
144E-9
7.50E-04
2008 Sprayers
G4 Agnwllumi EqupmeM
19M
0.09
002
0,9
5.88E -W
2.33E -07
1.28E -9
8.83E-04
2008 Sprayer
W AgricuWml Equipment
1905
O.M
0.02
0.00
520E-01
2.06E -07
1.14E -07
586E-04
2108 sprayers
W AgnwXuml Equipment
1900
0.9
0.02
0.3
4A3E-04
USE -07
9.01E -08
5.00E-04
2008 sprayers
W Agnwituml Equipment
ISM
0.3
0.01
ON
3.58E-04
1A2E 47
7.98E -08
4.WEAut
2(08 sprayers
W Agncutlumi Equipment
1982
0.05
QM
003
2.90E-04
1.15E -07
6.00E 00
327E4)4
2008 Swayers
W Agncullunt Equipment
1961
0.3
0.01
002
213E -04
8.46E -08
4.82E -00
2.40E-04
2008 sprayers
W Agn.tmal Equipment
1900
OW
0.01
0.02
1 .71E -04
6.77E -M
388E -0e
1.92E-04
2008 Sprayers
W AgrcuXural Equipment
1979
e02
0
001
1.19E -W
4.74E -M
273E -08
135E-04
2008 Sprayers
G4 AgrcuXural Equipment
1978
001
0
001
6.39E -05
2.54E-00
1ABE W
721E-05
2008 Sprayers
G4 Agrcutlural Equipment
1977
0
0
0
2.13E05
9.47EM
4.95E -W
2.40145
2008 Sprayers
G4 AgrcuXural Equipment
2008
0.3
0.01
009
0311
535E -0
1.12E -08
823E-04
2008 Swayers
G4 Agrcutlural Equipment
2007
O.W
OW
0.11
9801
656E-08
143E -08
1.00E-03
2000 Sprayers
W Agrcutluml Equipment
2U06
0.11
ew
0.16
144E-03
1.72E -7
221E-08
1.49E-03
2000 Sprayers
W Agrcutlural Equipmenl
2005
0.12
OM
0.17
162E4
1.84E -07
245E -08
1.58E-03
2000 Sprayers
W AgrcuBuml Emomeni
2004
0.12
OM
0.17
165E49
1.88E -07
2.61E -08
1.81E-03
2000 Sprayers
W Agnwtlural Equipment
233
0.12
0.3
0.17
1.55E -03
500E -9
2.11E -9
1.71E-3
2000 Swayers
W AgrcuXural Equipment
2002
0.12
OM
017
1.54E -W
499E -07
209E -07
1.6911
2000 Swayers
W AgrcuXural Equipment
2001
0.12
003
0.17
1.3E -M
4116E-9
200E -7
1.69E -03
2000 Sprayers
W Agtlwtluml Equipment
2000
0.12
OM
017
1.51E 03
4901
29E 4)7
167E-03
2008 Spayers
G4 AgiiwXuml Equipment
1999
0.12
0.03
OAS
1.49E -03
4.84E 4)7
2.00E -0]
161E -03
2108 Swayers
W Agnwiluml Equipment
1998
0.12
O.M
0.16
1.47E43
4.78E -07
2.00E -07
1.02E-03
2009 Swayers
G4 Agrcutlural Equipment
1997
0.3
0.01
0.00
3.37E-01
1.03E -07
3.94E-00
.7.69E-04
2008 swayer
W Agncutlural EgwMent
1996
0.01
0
001
125E-04
381E -08
1.47E-08
1.37E-04
2008 Swayers
W AgnwRuml Equipment
1993
0
0
9
249E-05
760E-09
293E -W
2.73E-05
2008 Swayers
W AgrcuXural Equipment
1992
0
0
001
567E -5
124E -08
671E-09
6.22145
2008 sprayers
G4 AgrcuXural Equpmenl
1990
0.00
001
005
4.35E-04
1.33E -07
517E -M
478E-04
238 sprayers
W AgrcuXUml Equipment
INS
0.0
0.01
0.00
3.89E 34
1.19E 07
COE 3
4.27E-0t
2008 Sprayers
W Agnculural Equipmenl
1900
0.0
0.01
0 W
3.51E-04
1.09El)7
4.22E -08
3.88E414
Agricultural Emissions (Los Gatos as a Percent of the County of Santa Clara's Agricultural Land) - Offroad Year 2008.
POpuk09 Ac1N'ny Oansumpup
2798 Sprayers
W AgnwWMl Equipment
1986
0.02
0
0.03
2.66E-01
0.14E-0B
3.18E -08
:1.:1Vt-W
a
2000 Sprayers
W AgOwltunl Equipment
1905
0.02
0
0.03
235E-01
610E-09
2.92E -a
2000 Sprayers
W Agkuftunal Equipment
191
0.02
0
0.02
200E-01
2.02E -08
2.58E-01
0
0
2008 Sprayers
W Agticuhural Equipment
1982
0.01
0
6.14E-00
2.41E -08
220E-01
0
2008 Sprayers
W Agrtwltural Equipment
1982
0.01
0.02
1.82E -01
4.96E
1.95E -08
1.37E-01
0
2798 Sprayers
W Agacullural Equipment
1981
001
0
0.01
1.31E-01
-W
402E -1
1.56E -0B
1.134E-01
a
2008 Spayen
W AgmuKuml Equipment
1900
0.01
0
0
0.01
9.82E 45
296E -3
1.16E
105E-0I
0
2000 Sprayers
GI AgMUltunl Equipment
1979
0
0
0.01
5.30E-0S
2.36E-00
W
9.3E -09
BASE -05
0
2008 Spralars
W AgicuOUml Equipment
1978
0
0
0.01
5.39E-05
168E-0B
13.51E -W
5.92E 45
0
2796 Sprayers
G• Agricultural Equipment
1977
0
0
0
289E -W
868E-09
3.51E -W
3.16E-05
0
2000 Tilers
G4 Agricultural Equipment
2798
19.89
0
0.4
0.62E -W
2.98E-09
116E -09
106E-05
0
2008 Tlkrs
W Agricultural Equipment
200]
IW.M
1119.]3.
2138
10.43
568E-02
3.81E-05
1.81E -05
5]E- -02
19
2000 Tilers
dit i
W Agnwaunl Equipment
2006
127.2 -
23.1
503E-02
181E -05
3.38E -05
8.59E -02
22
2008 Tillers
W Agricultural Equipment
2005
12].2
21.38
11.29
5.14E-02
5.39E-05
3.90E -05
7.19E -02
24
2008 Tlkn
W Agricultural Equipment
201
181.82
5
12.13
S.BE 42
599E -05
6.91E -05
7.711E-02
38
20(18 Tippers
W Agricultural Equipment
203
185.91
3612
17.5
8.d7E -02
9.99E -OS
6.91E -05
1.14E -01
38
2008 Tillers
W Agnwuural Equipment
2792
176.4 -
35.13
10.79
B.52E4u
9.33E -05
7.38E -05
1.18E -01
37
2000 Tillers
W AgnwXpal Equipment
2001
1]6.13 -
3136
R.28
816E-02
9.32E -05
7.1E -05
1.13E -01
37
2000 TOkrS
W AgricuBUnl Equipment
2000
151.38
29.49
20.98
8.08E
1.03E -05
1.67E
1.06E -01
2008
G• AgnwBUral Equipment
1999
149.11
28.45
18
-W
6.01E -3
6.03E -05
W
162E -01
9.12E-02
w
W
nier5
2008 tilers
Gd AgncuNUnl Equipment
1998
115.111
29.11
1273
11.31
8.83E-02
5.1EE05
149E
8.99E-02
5
2000 Tllkrs
W Agncuqural Equipment
tine
•8.61
8.68E-02
5.81E-05
1.46E-04
4
9.69E-02
29
2000 T1re
W A9.11Ural Equipment
1995
35]2
5.51
2UE-0P
106E -05
4.67E -05
281E-02
9
2079 Tatra
W Agnwltual Equipment
1995
204
8.96
Cis
3.90
1315
1.81E-02
142E -05
3.5E -05
215E-0Z
]
2008 Tlkrs
W AgmuXUral Equipment
1994
215
042
2.01
9.35E-03
903E-06
1.01E-5
1.21E-02
4
203 Tlkrs
W AgncuCUral Equipment
1993
8.81
1.33
0.26
9.83E-01
963E
2.01E -W
1.33E-03
I1
2790 Tdkn
W Agiiwituml Equipment
1992
8.82
132
0.82
3.12E 43
-W
3.12E -W
8.36E -W
1.22E -03
1
2008 Tllkrs
W Agnwhuml Equipment
1991
4.13
108
1.01E -03
4.03406
8.24E -06
5QE-03
2
21109 Tllkrs
GO AgnwXUral Equipment
1990
33.7
0.8
015
1.69E -3
1.89E-08
360E -W
256E-03
1
2008 T91xs
Gd AgrcuXUrel Equipment
1989
28.43
6.5
5.51
0.04
1.54E-02
1.51E -05
3.15E -05
209E-02
7
2008 tillers
G4 Agrpuft.1 Equpmem
1988
2523
4.91
3 I
130E -3
1.30E -05
2.65E -05
138E -02
6
2000 Tilkn
W Agnwyuml Equipment
1987
20.92
3.5
3.03
1.10E-02
1.15E -W
2.38E -05
.1.58602
5
2798 Ti1kr5
W Agmu0uml Equipment
1986
15.82
IN
245
9.36E-03
9.1E-06
1.91E -05
1.26E 4)2
4
2008 Tillers
G4 Agnwllural Equipment
1905
12.81
25
1.87
916E-03
7.14E-06
1.16E -05
9.60E-03
3
2798 Tlpas
04 Agricultural Equipment
191
8.76
1.71
1.51
5.87E-0.T
5.08E-06
124E -05
7.94E -3
3
20(18 Tlkrs
W Agricultural Equipment
1983
6.41
1.25
1.05
0.01E 43
1.01E-06
8.18E W
513E-03
2
2798 Tlkn
W AgnwXUral Equipment
1982
367
0.32
0.77
291E -03
2.93E-06
5.98E -W
390E -03
1
211011 TAkn
W Agn.1tunl Equipment
1981
133 -
0.26
0."
1.68E-03
1.68E -05
3.4E-06
227E -03
1
21108 Swellnrs
W Agmullual Equipment
2008
091
011
0.16
8.12E-01
8.11E -07
1.25E -W
8.27E-01
0
2008 SaMhers
G• Agmulluml Equipment
2007
1.1
029
0.98
9.22E-03
091E -07
200E -07
944E-3
3
2008 Swathes
G4 AgnwOUral Equipment
2006
1.61
042
1.19
1.12E -3
552E -00
2.18E -07
1.15E-02
4
2790 Svmhere
G4 Agnwllural Equipment
2445
1.71
0.45
1.35
1.1E -W
213E -06
3.76E -07
1.61E -02
6
2790 S nftue
W Agnwluaal Equipment
2004
1 .31
1.85
136E -02
2.30E-06
4.12E -07
1.82E-02
6
20DB SYal0e s
W Agrku11umi Equipment
2793
134
0.45
045
1.09
IJIME 2
211E-08
6.31E -07
1.85E-02
6
2798 9.eemers
W A9ncuXUml Equipment
2002
132
0.15
2.07
IJME 2
8.52E-06
1.034.3
1.99E -02
]
2008 Seathem
W AgncuXUml Equipment
2791
132
0.45
2.01
1.7E-02
8.1E-0fi
4.03E -W
1.98E-02
7
1798 Siesthem
G4 AgnwXUral Equipment
2079
169
0.61
2.01
1.65E-02
8.1E-3
1.01E-06
1.95E-02
6
2008 SwMhers
W Agnwftumd Equipment
1939
1.60
201
1.73E -02
6.WE.W
4.03E-06
193E -02
6
2008 SvMhers
W AgnwXUnl Equipment
1990
1.65
0.40
1.99
130E-02
6.25E -06
4.01E -W
180E -02
6
2408 znmlllers
Gd AgncuOUral Equipment
1997
0.38
0.93
1.5
1.86E-02
6.18E -W
4.WE -W
1.88E -02
6
2798 Saathme
G4 Agricultural Equipment
1911(1
0.14
0.1
0.01
0."
3.85E-03
1.33E -W
7.05 -06
418E -03
1
2008 Svehem
G4 Agricultural Equipment
1993
003
0.01
0.16
1.43E-03
0.92E-0J
2.91E -07
1.59403
1
2148 SWathera
W Agncuilunl Equipment
1992
O.W
0.02
0.03
2.84E-01
9.8E-08
6.02E-08
3.16E-01
0
2008 S Winem
W Agricultural Equipment
1979
O.49
0.13
007
6.19E-0•
214E -07
1.39E 4i7
6.21E-04
0
2798 Swalhnm
W AgnwXUral Equipment
1909
0.41
050
1.9E-03
1.72E-06
1.08E -W
5.54E -03
2
21109 Svalhers
W AgncuOUral Equipment
1980
0.4
0.11
0.51
IAE-03
1.51E-06
9.65E -47
590E -03
2
230 S Mhers
G4 mcuXUra1 E
Ag. Equipment
198]
0.34
0.1
047
0543
1.10E-06
0.96E -07
0.50E-03
1
238 Swamer9
W Agra l Equipment
193
0.3
O.W
0.08
0.39
343E 43
1.19E-08
6.83E -W
392E -03
1
2000 Swethers
ftun
W Agriwltuml Equipment
1995
018
O.07
0.35
3.1E-03
105E-06
6.83E -07
3.38E-03
1
2000 Seelhee
W Agricultural Equipment
1981
012
O.W
0.31
2.89E-03
918E -07 -
6.09E -07
2.99E -03
1
2008 Saalhem
G• AgiwXUral Equipment
1983
0.18
O.W
016
229E 43
7.92E -W
523E -0]
2.55E -03
1
2008 Saathas
Gd Agncultunl Equipment
1902
0.15
0.01
011
1.85E-03
8.39E -07
526E -07
2.3E -03
1
2408 Sunthen
W A,.ftunl Equipment
1981
0.11
0.13
1,50E -3
5.18E -07
2.48E -07
1.3E-03
1
238 Svethers
W AgncuXUml Equipment
1979
OM
0.03
0.02
0.13
1AW-03
3.81E -07
2.56E -W
112E-03
0
2000 zeeetheni,
W Agricultural Equipment
1979
0.79
0.1
8.80E-0I
3.05E -07
2.07E-0]
9.69E-04
0
2008 Saathers
W Agricultural Equipment
1908
0.03
0.02
0.01
0.07
6.18E-01
213E -07
1.117E-0]
6.66E-01
0
241011 Saalnem
limi
W AgncuXUral Equipment
1900
0.01
03
330E-01
1.14E-07
992E -W
3.66E-01
0
238 Sealhem
W AgOftural Equipment
0.69
0
0.18
001
1.10E-0•
6.143
266E -3
1.22E-04
0
2798 Seathere
W Agricultural Equipment
M7
ZWI
0114
1.1
1.01E -W
8.83E-07
1.42E -07
1.3E -02
3
2008 6wnthem
G4 Agnwhural Equipment
20(16
111
124
0.22
1.1
113E -W
8.4E -07
1.81E -00
125E -02
4
238 Svelhers
Gd Agricultural Equipment
235
1.31
0.32
1.79
1.am-0
210E-08
2.81E -00
1.00E-02
6
2X8 Swalhers
G4 Agricuuuml Equipment
2004
1.31
0.31
0.35
2.3
1.90E-02
235E -W
3.18E -07
1.90E-02
7
Agncultuml Equipment
2003
1.51
0.35
2.12
191E-02
241 E-W
3.38E -07
23E-02
]
203 Swathem
G4 Agd.hurm Equipment
2002
1.32
0.31
2.13
1.94E-02
843E -06
265E-06
2.15E -02
]
238 Swatheie
W AgOwXUnl Equipment
231
132
0.31
2.11
1.92E-02
8.30E-06
283E -W
2.12E -02
]
2798 SWheie
W AgiiwXUnl Equipment
2000
13
2.1
1.91E-02
633E-06
2.52E-06
2.11E -02
]
238 SvMBers
W Agmullual Equipment
1999
118
0.1
207
1.89E -02
615E-06
259E -W
209E -02
J
230 Saetnms
W AgncuXUral Equipment
1998
117
0.33
205
1.3E -02
6.17E-05
250E-3
279E-02
6
2796 Swalhers
W AgncuXUml Equipment
1997
0.29
0.31
0.3
2.02
1.1E-02
5.10E -W
2.54E -W
2.03E -02
7
2101 Sealhem
W Agricultural Equipment
1996
0.11
0.03
016
1311E-03
1.31E -W
4%E -07
4.63EAPI
2
203 Seethem
G4 Agricultural Equipment
1993
0.3
0.01
0.17
1.58E-03
•.WE -07
161E -07
1.41E-03
1
203 Seathers
GI Agnw0uml Equipment
1992
0.3
0.01
0.3
3.11E-01
93E -3
3.69E-08
3.41E-01
0
2008 Senthers
G4 Agricultural Equipment
193
0.30
008
509E-1
212E -00
8.61E -W
7.69E-04
0
2000 SWaltnmi
W Agncultural Equipment
1989
0.33
0.59
5.41E-03
1.6E-06
5.51E -07
5.98E -03
2
238 Swalhers
W Agricultural Equipment
1988
03
.
0.79
053
589E-03
1.5 -08
5.83E -07
5.34E -03
2
2008 Sweeten
W Agricultural Equipment
198]
016
0.08
048
543E43
1.39E-0B
5.32E -07
467E-03
2
238 Swa0pen
W ggricuttuml Eg
195
023
0.00
OM
0.61
335E -03
1.18E-08
4.52E-0
513E-0S
1
2008 swmhns
OneM
W Atimultunl EqupmeM
1985
0.2
O.W
0.36
2.32E-03
101E -W
4.01E-0]
3.65E-03
1
230 Svamers
W Agn<uXUnl Equipment
191
032
2.1E 43
920E-07
355E-0]
3.23E -03
1
0.17
p.1
027
2.50E-03
ZBSE -07
3.3E 47
2.6E -03
1
Agricultural Emissions (Los Gatos as a Percent of the County of Santa Clara's Agricultural Land) - Offroad Year 2008.
Pepula9e pantry Consump0o
CY Equipment Fuel Class w Ihouraldayl n CO2EVhaust MOEaMUat CHOEShaust CO2e CO2e
2008 SaHhers
G4 Agricultural Equipment
1983
0.14
0."
022
2.02E-0J
6.31E -07
2.46E -07
2.22E -3
2008 Sxathers
W Agncultural Equipment
1982
0.11
003
0.18
1.61E-03
5.14E 4)7
1.99E -07
1.80E-0D
2000 Swmhers
W Agncutund Equipment
19,111
ON
0.02
0.13
120E-03
3.78E -07
1.47E -07
1.32E-03
2008 S.vmhers
W Agtieultunl Equipment
1980
0.07
0.02
0.1
962E-01
3.02E -07
1.18E-07
1.46E-03
2008 Semhers
W Agncutlural Equipment
1979
ON
0.01
007
8.74E-04
2.12E -07
820E-08
7AtE-01
2008 Sxmhers
W A9ncuUnit Equipment
1970
0.02
001
004
3.61E-01
1.14E -07
044E -08
3.97E-01
2008 SxalM1ers
W Agricultural Equipment
1977
0.01
0
001
1.211E -01
3.79E-08
1A0E -08
1.32E-01
2008 Hydm Pager Unis
W Agncutlural Equipment
2008
183
038
0.19
104E -03
1.78E -00
1.29E-06
1A9E43
2008 Hydm Parer Unis
G4 Agncutlural Equipment
2007
1.37
ON
0.15
870E-04
129E-06
1.31E -00
1.30E-03
2000 Hydm Paver Unis
G4 Agncutlural Equipment
2006
0.32
0.15
003
203E -04
3.00E -07
307E07
302E-04
2000 Hire. Pgeer Units
G4 Agnuutlural Equipment
2005
0.07
0.03
001
480E -05
6.79E-08
8.95E -08
6.85E -OS
2008 HyEm Power Units
G4 Agricultural Equipment
2000
3.25
4.14
113
8.78E-03
1.02E-05
7.81E-06
1.21E -02
2008 Hydra Pacer Units
W Agewiural Equipment
2007
273
3.47
1.54
7.38E-03
8.73E-06
6.74E-06
IOXE
2008 Hydro Power Unis
W Agricultural Equipment
2006
0"
0.81
0.36
172E-03
2.01E-06
1.57E -00
238E -3
2(108 Hydro Parer Unis
W Agnwnuml Equipment
2005
0.14
0.18
008
389E-04
4.61E -07
3.56E -07
540E-0I
2008 Hydro Parer Unis
G4 Agncutlural Equipment
2008
114
1.50
1.53
7.11EN
580E-06
6.68E -00
899E-03
2008 Hydro Power Unis
W Agncutlural Equipment
2007
IN
1.32
129
5.91
4.77E-06
5.78E-06
7.57E-03
2008 Hyem Paver Units
G4 Agricultural Equipment
2006
024
031
0.3
1.39E -03
1.11E-08
1.31E-6
1JBE-03
2008 Hyem Power Units
04 A,i,utluml Equipment
2005
0.05
007
0.7
3.151E N
252E -07
3.05E -07
4.00E-0I
2008 Hydm power Units
04 Agricultural Equipment
2008
a."
0.05
0.1
8 .78E-04
1.35E -07
5.49E 08
921E-04
2008 Hrem P., Un95
G4 Agncutlural Equipment
2007
O.M
0.04
0.09
801E-04
1.26E7
5.IBE -08
84512 I
;iOw Hpm Power Und,
G4 Agncutlural Equipment
2006
OAS
0.01
009
7.58E-01
1.51E -07
571E-08
8.05E-0I
2008 Hydro Power Unis
W Agmurunl Equipment
2005
0.03
ON
009
7.24E-01
1.52E 4)7
5.89E-08
772E-01
2008 Hire. Power Unis
W Agricultural Equipment
2004
0.03
ON
0.0
6.52E-04
1ME -07
5.71E -00
6.98E-01
&paa Hydro Paver Units
G4 Agncumal Equipment
2003
0.01
0.01
0.03
219E-0l
9.70E-08
8.97E -08
2.81E-0I
2008 Hydm Paver Units
04 Agncutlural Equipment
2002
0.01
0.01
0.02
1.48E-4N
825E -08
5.99E -0B
168E-0I
2008 Hydm Power Unis
W AgmulN2l Equipment
2001
0
0
0.01
90IE -05
3.83E -08
3.81E-08
1.03E-04
2008 ". Power Unis
W Agricultural Equipment
2000
0
0
0.01
5.42E -05
230E-08
2.36E -OB
6.19E -05
2008 KW. Power Unis
W Agncutlural Equipment
1999
0
0
0
1.54E -05
67E -00
6.96E -09
136E -05
2008 Rldm Paver Units
G4 Agricultural Equipment
2000
0.01
0.01
0.03
302E-04
283E -08
7.14E -09
3.11E-04
2008 Hydm Power Units
G4 Ayrcuumal Equipment
2007
0.01
0.01
0.03
278E-04
2. %E -ft
7.27E 09
287E-04
alm Hydm Pacer Units
G4 Agrcutlual Equipment
2006
0.01
0.01
0.03
24OEG4
387E -08
Z22E -09
252E-04
;iON Hydro Poem Unis
W Agricultural Equipment
21105
0
0
001
6.91
1.13-08
229E-09
7.28E -05
2008 Hyem POeer Unis
W Agncutlural Equipment
2004
0
0
O
3.47E-05
518E419
115E -09
381
a00B Iyem Paver Unis
G4 Agricultural Equipment
2003
0
0
0
9.16E -00
3.73E-09
2.53E-09
1.01E -05
211YB 01hm Agnwlluml Equipment
04 Agncutlural Equipment
2000
1.14
045
0.09
4JOE4N
6.03E -07
5.57E -7
8.94E-0I
2008 "hm Agncuiunl Equipment
G4 Agricultural Equipment
2007
095
0.38
0.07
395E-04
6.48E -7
5.80E -7
6,011E4M
2008 gher Agnwaurat Equipment
G4 Agncutlural Equipment
2008
012
0.09
002
921E -0
1.52E -07
119E -a7
1A2E4N
2008 othm Agncutlual Equipment
G4 Agricultural Equipment
2005
0.05
002
0
2.00E -05
345E416
3.15E -08
322E -05
2008 other AglicuBUml Equipment
G4 Agneutlural Equipment
2000
026
0.1
0.00
268E-0l
245E -07
1.80E -07
3.48E-0I
appall othrr Agremumal Equipment
G4 Agncutlural Equipment
2007
026
0.1
ON
265E -0I
2.60E-07
2.04E -07
3.50E-0l
2008 Other Agricultural Equipment
G4 AgmuXUal Equipment
2006
021
ON
0.05
219E-04
2.30E -07
1.91E -07
2.94E-04
2008 Other Agricultural Equipment
G4 Agricultural Equipment
2005
02
ON
0.01
209E-04
225E -07
1.91E -07
282E-0I
a108 other Agricultural Equipment
W Agricultural Equipment
2004
0.2
0.0
004
2.01E-04
220E 47
1.07E -97
2.76E-04
2008 Other Agrkultual Equipment
W Agncutlural Equipment
2003
0.19
007
(0"
1.92E-04
207E -07
136E -07
260E-0l
2008 gher Agricultural Equipment
W Agricultural Equipment
2002
0.18
0.07
0.0
1.88E-04
1.561
4.11E -07
2.45E th
2008 otbcr Agtkuwnl Equipment
G4 Agecultunl Equipment
2001
0.18
0.07
0.05
187E-04
1.55E -07
4.09E -07
244E-0I
2008 gher Agricultural Equipment
G4 Agncutlural Equipment
2000
0.15
ON
004
1.53E-04
127E -07
3.35E -07
2.00E-04
2008 other Agricultural Equipment
W Agncutlural Equipment
1099
0.09
003
002
0.80E -05
730E-08
1.7E -07
1.15E-04
2008 other Agricultural Equipment
W Agncutlural Equipment
1990
0.7
003
002
6.82E -05
566E -08
1.49E -7
8.89E-05
2018 other Agriwtlunl Equipment
34 Agricultural Equipment
1900
0.03
001
001
3.22E -05
267E -OB
7.02E-00
4.19E-05
2008 gher Agricultural Equipment
G4 Agricultural Equipment
19%
0.02
0.01
0.01
236E-05
2.39E -OB
5.65E-00
322E-05
2008 gher Agnwiural Equipment
G4 Agncutlurm Equipment
1995
0.02
0.01
0
184E -5
1.56E-08
3.33E -08
219E -05
2008 other Agncutlural Equipment
G4 Agricultural Equipment
1994
0.01
0
0
9.81E-06
931E-09
2.00E -00
1.31E -05
2008 "her Agricultural Equipment
G4 Agncutlural Equipment
1993
0.01
0
0
7.58E-06
721E -09
1.51E -00
1.01E-5
2008 "her Agtlwtlural Equipment
G4 Agncutlural Equipment
1992
0
0
0
5.01E-06
690E-09
1.03E 00
6.74E-06
2008 "her Agnicultual Equipment
G4 Agneutlural Equipment
1991
0
a
0
1.49E-08
1.42E00
3.01E -09
2.00E-08
2008 other Agniwwrm Equipment
G4 AgmuAtural Equipment
2010
007
0.03
0.01
1.71E -04
9.75E-00
1.21E 07
204E-01
2000 Other Agnweural Equipment
G4 A,r tebuml Equipment
2007
0.07
0.03
004
1.69E-01
1.01E-07
137E-07
2.04E-01
2000 "her Agncueural Equipment
G4 Agricultural Equipment
2008
0.05
0.02
003
1AOE 01
9.15E-08
128E -07
1.71E-01
2000 "her Agriculture] Equipment
G4 Agrkupural Equipment
2005
am
0.02
OM
1.33E-04
896E-0B
1.29E -07
1.83E-04
2008 Other Agnwtlual Equipment
G4 Agncutlural Equipment
2004
am
0.02
0.03
1.30E-04
875E-00
1.26E -07
1.60E414
2008 "her AgrkuOmal Equipment
G4 AgrkuXural Equipment
2013
005
0.02
am
IM-Owl
8.23E-08
1.18E -07
1. %E41ul
2008 "her Agrcullmsl Equipment
W Agricultural Equipment
2002
0.05
0.02
003
120E-0I
5.82E-08
2.23E07
1AXE
x008 other Agrcusurel Equipment
W Agewltuml Equipment
2001
005
0.02
003
1.19E-04
5.50E-08
2.23E -07
1.42E-01
2008 other Agricultural Equipment
W Agricultural Equipment
2000
ON
0.02
0.02
9 .78E-05
434E-08
182E -7
1.16E-01
2008 0tM1er Agecuwnl Equipment
W Agricultural Equipment
1999
0.02
101
001
561E -0
272E-0B
185E-07
867E -05
2008 "her Agricultural Equipment
W Agnmitural Equipment
1990
0.02
0.01
001
4.35E -05
211E-0B
0.10E -08
5.17E-05
2008 "her Agricultural Equipment
G4 AgnwXural Equipment
197
0.01
0
0
205E-05
9.95E -09
IRE 08
244E-0S
4008 other AgmuAmal Equipment
G4 Agricultural Equipment
196
001
0
0
1.00E-05
938E -09
3.19E -08
1.87E-05
2008 other Agricultural Equipment
G4 Agricultural Equipment
1995
O
0
0
1.04E-05
6.37E -09
1.88E -08
129E -05
2008 "her Agrkutlurel Equipment
G4 Agricultural Equipment
1994
0
0
0
825E -06
3.82E -00
1.13E-0B
7.7E-08
2cOB Other Agricultural Equipment
G4 Agricultural Equipment
1993
0
0
0
4.87E-06
295E-09
872E -09
5.97E-06
21108 Other Agricultural Equipment
W Agnwsural Equipment
1992
0
0
0
321E-06
1.96E -09
5.80E -09
3.94E-06
21108 "her Agrkultuml Equipment
G4 Agricultural Equipment
1991
0
0
0
9.51E -07
5.81E -10
1 .72E -09
1.0E-08
2008 other Agmururm Equipment
W Agricultural Equipment
2008
0.03
0.01
0.02
1.00E-01
2.82E -08
9.7E -00
112-11
2008 other Agrcusunl Equipment
W Agricultural Equipment
297
0.00
0.01
07
1 %E -01
2 .74E -08
9.48E -09
17E44
2008 "her Agricultural Equiprned
W Agnwltural Equipment
2006
004
0.01
002
170E -04
3.35E -08
105E -08
180E4N
2008 "her Agricultural Equipment
W Agricultural Equipment
21105
ON
0.01
002
177E -04
357E -OB
1.13E -08
1.89E-04
2008 other Ag4rultual Equipment
G4 Agncutlural Equipment
2011
ON
0.01
0.02
1.92E -04
394E -08
1.26E -08
2.01E-1N
2008 "her Agnwltu id Equipment
G4 Agncutlural Equipment
2003
ON
ON
ON
2.81E -OI
1.35E -7
9.16E08
324E-04
200 "her Agnwltuml Equipment
G4 Agricultural Equipment
21102
0.06
0.7
0.04
285E-01
1.37E -07
9.42E -08
329E-0I
2008 Other Agnwrmat Equipment
64 Agricultural EqupmeM
MI
008
ON
ON
284E-01
1.37E07
9.52E -08
329E-0I
2008 "her Aqn ftunlEquipmend
G4 AgricuBurm Equipment
2000
0.06
ON
004
281E-04
1.76E -07
9.53E-0B
31 5E4th
2008 Other Agrcutlual Equipment
W Agricultural Equipment
1999
0.06
002
ON
2.76E-04
1.33E -07
946E -08
3.19E-01
2000 other Agrkullu al Equipment
W Agncurunl Equipment
1908
0.06
0.02
0.03
2.68E-04
119E -07
9.30E -08
3.10E-0I
2000 "her Agricultural Equipment
G4 Agncutlural Equipment
1997
OM
0.01
0.01
957E-05
CUE-W
2 %E -08
1.10E-04
2000 other Pgrkusurat Equipment
W Agricultural Equipment
1996
0.02
0.01
0.01
748E -05
339E -08
226E -W
8.55E-05
2008 other AgOcultual Equipment
G4 Agncuhmal Equipment
1995
0.01
0
0
2.7E -05
1.21E -08
80E -09
3.7E-05
2000 other Agricultural Equipment
G4 Agmurtmal Equipment
191
0
0
0
8.75E-06
397E-09
2 .70E -09
1.00E-05
Agricultural Emissions (Los Gatos as a Percent of the County of Santa Clara's Agricultural Land) - Offroad Year 2008.
Populalb AdN'my Oonsumpuo
Iwo un, ngreummm equipment
2000 Olken Agricultural Equipment
W Ag.Ru.1 Equipment
W Agricultural Equipment
1993
1992
0
0
0
1.(i0E -05
T.26E41)
581E -09
154E -05
2008 Other Agricultural Equipment
W Agricultural Equipment
1991
0
0
0
0
0
1.81E-05
8.20E-09
5.71E -09
2.67E -05
intent 0 Omer Agricultural Equipment
W Agricu0ural Equipment
1990
0.01
0
0
9.73E-06
142E 49
3.11E -09
1.12E -05
2008 Other Agriculurel Equipment
W Agnwltunl Equipment
1909
0.01
0
0.01
5.15E 45
234E -00
146E -OB
5.91E -05
2008 Other Agricultural Equipment
W AgnwXUnl Equipment
1908
0AI
0
0.01
4.15E 45
1.09E -08
156E -08
4.77E-05
2000 Other Agricultural Equipment
G4 Agncultunl Equipmem
107
0.01
0
0
352E-05
1.51E -0
1A0EE08
3.81E-05
2670 Other Agnculunl Equipment
04 Agricultural Equipment
1986
0
0
0
2.64E-05
120E-00
8.01E-09
3.03E-05
2008 Other Agricultural Equipment
W Agricultural Equipment
1985
0
0
0
1.78E -0
8.15E-0g
6.04E-09
208E -05
201 Other Agricultural Equipment
04 Agricultural Equipment
19&
0
0
0
1.20E -05
5.84E-0g
4.37E-09
147E-05
2000 Other Agreement Equipment
G4 Agrkuluel Equipment
1903
0
0
0
7.55E-06
320E-09
2.60E-09
887E-06
2008 Other Agricultural Equipment
G4 Agnwluml Equipment
2000
0.2
0.07
0
252E-06
1.15E-09
8.75E -10
289E-06
2008 Other AgricuXUml Equipment
W Agricultural Equipment
2007
02
0.67
023
2.18E-03
1.80E -07
4.71608
222E-03
2000 Other Agricultural Equipment
W Agricultural Equipment
2006
021
0.07
0.22
2.09E-03
1nE-O7
4.70E-00
2.14E-03
2008 Other Agticultural Equipment
W Agricemural Equipment
2005
022
0.07
0.24
225E -03
339E -07
5.30E.1
255E -03
2008 Other Agrkuhural Equipment
W AgeemHural Equipment
2Wl
024
0.1
9.25
2.35E-03
358E -07
5 .72E 08
246E -03
MOB Other Agricultural Equipment
W Agenqultunl Equipmem
2003
055
0.12
0.27
2.51E-03
389E -07
6.40E -0B
286E -03
2000 Other Agricultural Equipment
W Agricultural Equipment
2002
0.35
0.12
0.0.1
3.71E-03
1.51E 06
857E -07
420E-03
2008 Other Agricultural Equipment
W Agricultural EqupmeM
2001
0.35
0.12
044
1PE-03
153E -OB
882E -07
626E-03
201 Other Agncultural Equipment
G4 AgnwXurel Equipment
2000
0.35
0.12
0.20
3.76E -04
1.53E-08
891E-0T
425E-03
201 Other Agriculture] Equipment
G4 Agricultural EquipmeM
1999
01
0.12
0.43
332E -03
151E-08
8.92E-07
421E-03
MOB Other Agnwltumi Equipment
G4 Ape.Wnl Equipment
1998
053
0.11
0.13
365E -03
1AIE -06
8.85E-67
443E -03
2008 Other Agrkuntual Equipment
W Agnwltural Equipment
1997
0.12
081
0.41
3.51E-0S
1.44E-08
8 .70E -07
4.01E -03
2008 Other Agricultural Equipment
W Agricultural Equipment
1996
0.09
083
0.15
12.7E-03
183E 47
287E -07
1A211 S
2000 Other Agricultural Equipment
W Agneintuml Equipment
1995
0.03
0.01
0.11
9.90E-01
33M,07
2.11E -07
1.11E -03
20UB Other Agricultural Equipment
W Agricultural Equipment
1994
0.01
0
ON
3.51E-01
1.35E -07
TUE 48
397E-04
9108 Other Agricultural Equipment
W Agricultural Equipment
1993
082
0.01
0.01
1.16E-04
4.42E -08
253E-0B
130E-1
2008 Other Agricultural Equipment
G4 AgrlCUltunl Equipment
1992
092
0.01
002
212E-04
8.10E-0B
480E -08
250E-01
2008 Ot]Mr Agiiceluel Equipment
W Agnwltural Equipment
1991
0.01
0
0.1
239E-01
914E -08
554E -08
2.69E-01
2008 Other Agricultural Equipment
G4 AgnwXural Equipment
1990
086
082
081
129E-04
4.92E -08
2.91E -08
1.45E-04
MOB Other Agrkultunl Equipment
04 Aphufteal Equipment
1909
0.05
052
0.08
6.81E-04
260E 47
1.55E -07
7.65E-01
MOB Other Agriculuml Equipment
G4 Agricutunl Equpmem
1988
0,04
081
O.M
5.50E-01
2.10E -07
1.271107
6.18E-4M
Np8 Other Agricultural Equipment
W Agricultural Equipment
19117
093
0.01
0.05
004
4.10E-01
180E -07
19SE07
4.94E-04
2000 Other Agricultural Equipment
W Agreement Equipment
1986
0.02
0.01
093
350E-01
154E -07
824E -08
393E-00
2000 Other Agrkulum] Equipment
W Agmiwhurel Equipment
1985
0.02
0.01
237E-01
989E-00
585E -1
267E-01
2000 Other Agrpu1u21 Equipment
W Agricultural Equipment
1981
0.01
0
0.02
1.70E-01
6.51E-0B
4.09E -08
191E-0d
21108 Other Agnculnal Equipment
W A9rinuXUral Equipment
1903
0
0
001
999E -05
3.83E -08
2.43E -08
1.12E-04
MOB Glhur Agricutunl Equipment
W Agncullunl Equipment
2008
092
001
0
353E-05
128E -1
8.18E-09
3.74E-05
2008 Other Agricultural Equipment
G4 Agricultural Equipment
2007
082
0.01
0.05
4.87E-1
315E -08
895E -09
4.97E-04
2008 Other AgMUlural Equipment
G4 Agricultural Equipment
MOB
0.02
0.01
085
4 .70E-04
IME-08
714E-09
480E-04
2000 Other Agricultural Equipment
G4 Agricultural Equipment
2005
0.02
0.01
086
506E -1
593608
836E -09
5.24E-04
2008 Other Agncuhural Equipment
G4 Agrkuhuml Equipment
2004
0.03
0.01
aM
528E -1
6.25E-00
9.28E -09
547E-01
2000 Other Agneultural Equipment
34 Agncultuel Equipment
2003
0.1
0.01
006
5.71E-01
6.02E-00
187E -OB
5.93E-04
2008 Oluer Agricultural Equipment
W Agneulu it Equipment
2672
0.1
0.01
089
835E-01
283E -07
1.14E -07
919E-04
2008 Other A9neultural Equipment
W AgncuXural Equipment
2001
0.1
0.01
089
8.49EM
280E -07
1.17E 07
954E-1
2008 Other Agriculture] Equipment
W Agreement Equipment
2000
ON
0.01
089
8.47E-01
287E -07
117E -07
9.32E-01
ZOil Other Agricultural Equipment
W Agricultural Equipment
1999
ON
0.01
099
858E-01
2.1E -07
116E -07
9.22E-0e
2008 Other Agneei Equipment
W AgrkununlE iieurne
1998
ON
0.01
009
021E-01
2.59E -07
1.14E -07
91E-01
2008 Other ApicWural Equipment
W Agnculturel Equipment
Mir
051
0
0.09
7.981
2.52E -07
1.11607
8 .78E-04
2008 Other Agmiwlual Equipment
W Agricultural Equipment
1996
0.01
0
0.03
2.85E-01
846E -M
358E-08
31261
MOB Other Ag eehimil Equipment
G4 Agncultumi Equipment
1995
0
0
0.02
2.23E-01
882E -OB
285E-08
2A4E -1
2000 Other AgnwXura] Equipment
G4 Agncule.1 Equipment
1994
0
0
0.01
7.96E-05
237E -08
9.51E -08
0.71E-05
2008 Other Agricultural Equipment
W Agricultural EquipmeM
1993
0
0
0
2.61E-05
7.75E-09
312E-09
285E-05
2678 OthuAgricuhpal Equipment
G4 Agn[ultural Equipment
1992
0
0
0.01
4.PE40i
1AXE
5.73E-0g
5.220-05
2008 Other Agricultural Equipment
W Agnwltura] Equipment
1991
0
0
001
538E-05
160E-0B
6.49E-09
589E -05
2008 Other Agricultural Equipment
W Agricultural Equipment
1990
0.01
0
0
290E -05
8.63E -09
330E -09
3.17E-05
2673 Other Agncutunl Equipment
W Agnwryural Equipment
1989
0-01
0
0.02
153661
157E-08
186E-0B
180E-04
2000 Other Agricultural Equipment
W Agricultural Equipment
19M
a
0
0.01
124E-01
389E -08
1.50E-0B
155E-01
2008 Other A96culu it Equipment
W A46mirbrel Equipment
1987
0
0
091
9.90E-05
295E -1
1.21E -1
1.08E-01
MOB Other Agmkulu it Equipmem
G4 Agricultural EquipmeM
1906
0
0
0,01
7,87E -05
2.35E -OB
963E -09
8.82E-05
ZOOS Other Agnculhaal Equipment
W Agricultural Equipment
1985
0
0
001
551E -OS
1.602 -w
8.58E -09
585E-05
2008 outer Agmulmal Equipment
G4 Agricultural Equipment
1981
0
0
0
382E-05
1.14E-0B
4.71E -09
4.19E-05
201 Othre Athiwltunl Equipment
G4 Agricultural Equipment
1983
0
0
0
225E -05
6.73E -09
2 .78E-09
2e6E -05
MOB Other Agrkultunl Equipment
W Agmeluml Equipment
2000
0.01
0
0
TtiOE-06
224E-0g
928E -10
821E-06
2000 Other Agricultural Equipment
W AgncuXural Equipment
2007
0.01
0
003
318E-01
2.83E-08
4A9E -W
3.27E -1
2008 Other Agricultural Equipment
W Agnwhuml Equ"pmeme
2006
0.01
0
093
3.07E-04
214E-00
4,45E -09
315E-01
MOB Other Agnculural Equipment
W Agncuhural Equipment
200S
0.1
0
O.1
3.30E-04
3.02E-0B
562E -119
3.40E -1
201 Other Agnwlual EquipmeM
W AgnwXUnl Equipment
201
091
0
01
3.45E-04
3.18E-00
824E -09
3.55E-04
201 Other Agnculurel Equipment
W Agricultural Equipment
200.1
0.01
0
01
3.73E-04
3.48E-0B
718E -09
384E-04
2678 Other Agricultural Equipment
W Agncultural Equipment
2002
001
0.01
0.06
SASE44
897E -M
3 .78E -1
5.71E-04
2008 Other Agricultural Equipment
G4 Agncultunl Equipment
2001
081
0.01
ON
5.1E-04
1.03E -07
5.20E-08
587E-01
2008 Other AgricuWnl Equipment
G4 Agricultural Equipment
2000
081
0.1
086
5.53E-04
12X11 -07
651E -1
5.91E-04
2008 Other Agricultural Equipmem
W Agricultural Equipment
1999
0.01
0
086
5AM41
135E -67
778E -1
590E -1
ZWB Other Agrculture Equipment
W Agriwtunl Equipment
1998
0.01
0
0w
536E-04
152E -07
785E -08
539E-04
2008 Other Agricultural Equipment
W Agricultural Equipment
1997
0.01
0
01
521E-04
128E -07
7ABE-0B
562E-0d
2678 Other Agricultural Equipment
W Agneuhural Equipment
1996
0
0
002
188E-04
451E-08
2.27E -08
200E-04
201 Other Agreutuml Equipment
34 AgneuXUnl Equipment
1995
O
0
002
1,16E-04
3.37E-08
1.78E-08
i,eai
2008 Other Agricultural Equipment
W AgncuXurel Equipment
1996
0
0
091
520E-05
1.21E-08
6.39E -09
558E -05
MOB Other ApRieft nl Equipment
W Agnwhural Equipment
1993
0
0
0
1.70E-05
3.95E-09
240E -1
1.03E -05
MOB Other Apiwlual Equipment
G4 AgnwXuml Equipment
1992
0
0
0
3.11E -05
723E -09
3.85E -09
335E -05
2008 Other Agneuluml Equipment
G4 Agrkultunl Equipment
1991
0
0
0
3.51E 45
818E -09
436E -09
3 .79E -05
201 Other Agreement! Equipment
G4 A9nwhural Equipment
1990
0
0
0
189E -0
4A0E-09
235E-09
203E 45
2000 Omer Agmiculluml Equipment
G4 AgnwXUnl EquipmeM
1909
0
0
001
1.008E-1
2.33E -00
125E-08
188E-04
2008 Other AgOwXural Equipment
G4 AgncuXural Equipment
1988
0
0
001
880E -05
1.111tE -1
1.1E-08
868E-05
2008 OtherAgrkuftend Equipment
W Agncutpal Equipment
1987
0
0
0.01
846E-05
150E-08
8.11E-09
895E -05
MOB Other Agreuturel Equipment
W Agricultural Equipment
1986
0
0
0.01
5.14E-05
120E-08
6.47E -X9
5.53E-05
MOB Other Agreultunl Equipment
W Agnwhuet Equipment
1985
0
0
0
3.49E-05
813E-09
4.40E -09
535E -0.5
MOB Other AgncuXural Equipment
W Agneumnal Equipment
1984
0
0
0
250E -05
583E-09
3.16E -09
268E-05
2008 Other Agricultural Equipment
G4 Agricultural EquipmeM
1983
0
0
0
1.0E -1
343E-09
187E -09
158E -05
2008 Agricultural TramOn
D Agnwlural Equipment
0
4.90E -06
1.14E -09
8.24E -10
526E-06
ZOOS
55 83
81.5
39.17
429E -01
080E-00
4.50E -05
430E 4)1
Agricultural Emissions (Los Gatos as a Percent of the County of Santa Clara's Agricultural Land) - Offroad Year 2008.
PopubOO
AcMRr
Consumptio
CY Equipment
Fuel Cie.
R15'
(h.rdda7)
n
CO2ERhsud 1120Eahausl Ca1ERlleu11
002e
CO20
2008 AgrcuOUral Trades
D Agncuunl Equipment
2007
51^41
7501
W.07
3.95E 41
0.00E +W
4.15E -05
3.98E 41
131
2008 AgrkuRUnlTnales
D AgnwRUnl Equipment
20013
45.05
0.76
3181
346E -01
0.00E+00
3.63E -05
3AME I
115
2008 Agrkulturd TnMen
D Agricultural Equipment
2005
13
1890
9.12
9.99E-02
0.00E+00
1.05E 4)5
1.00E -01
33
2008 Ageputlural Tent.
D AgrkuBUml Equipment
2004
8.45
9A1
4.53
CSNE
000E+00
0.43E-06
1.97E-02
16
MI; Agrpunural Tendon
D Agra ftuml Equipment
2003
1.78
157
1.24
1.35E02
080E+00
1.75E -W
1.35E 42
4
2000 Agrkuteel Traetes
D Agekultuml Equpment
2008
38.29
5297
48.67
53tE -01
080E+00
5.02E -05
538E -01
177
2008 Agricultural TmttM
D Agricultural Equipment
2007
33.94
49.51
4551
500E -01
0.00E +00
5.44E -05
501E 41
100
2000 Agrkulmal Telcten
D Agricultural Equipment
Me
30.07
439
40.33
4AE 41
0.00E+00
4.82E -05
4.41E -01
147
20W Agricultural Trader
D Agrkulural Equipment
2005
2944
42.97
39.48
4.33E -01
000E+00
4.72E -05
1.31E -01
144
2008 Agrkulunl Triton
D Agrkuluml Equpment
2061
29.18
4259
39.15
4.3E -01
000P00
525E -05
4.31E -01
143
2000 Agrkulural Tradgn
D Agmultual Equipment
2003
27.97
40.82
37.52
4.12E -01
000E+00
5.03E -05
4.13E -01
137
508 AgrkuWnl Tmutes
D Agncunural Equipment
2002
10.97
16.01
1431
1.61E 41
O.WE +W
1.97E 45
182E -01
54
2008 Agrkutlural Tndon
D AgKUltural Equipment
2W1
6.95
10.14
932
1.02E-01
000E+00
125E +5
1.03E -01
3a
2008 Agrkutluml Tendon
0 Agricultural Equipment
2000
4.01
586
538
5.91E-02
000E+00
722Ew
5.92E -02
20
2000 Agriwllendnadors
D Agekunural Equipment
1999
291
415
3.97
CM2
000E+00
1.50E -05
4.31E 4)2
14
2008 Agricultural Trades
D Agieutural Equpment
1998
1.81
24
2.25
2454)2
0(i
8.51E -W
2.44E 42
8
2000 Agrkulunl Trades
D Agricultuml Equipment
1997
039
0187
0.81
8.73E-03
000E+00
3.07E -W
8.8E -03
3
2009 AgrkuluMITndes
D Agncunural Equipment
2008
31.4
4012
6358
700E -01
0.00E+00
1.59E -05
7.00E -01
232
2008 Agrkulunl T.O.
D Agecultural Equpment
2007
30.6
3980
621
6.82E -01
0.0E+00
3.8E -05
6.83E -01
25
2008 Agrkulunl Tncta
0 Agncunural Equipment
2006
no
37.84
%.W
647E -0t
080E+00
383E-05
6.4E -01
215
2008 Agrkinimed elan
D Agricultural Equpment
2W5
28.05
3855
57.1
6.2E -01
0.00E+00
598E -W
6.2E -01
207
2000 Agrpulu.ITractes
D Agmuluml Equipment
2004
27.68
36.08
00.61
6.17E -01
000E+00
1.03E-04
6.1E -01
205
2000 ApmutluralTmilm
D Agricultural Equipment
2003
27.59
35.95
57.15
8.15E -01
O.WE -W
2.32E-0d
5211E 41
205
2009 AgrcuRUnlTmet-
D AgncuRUral Equipment
2002
26.92
35.08
5583
8.00E -01
080E -00
2.37E-04
8.05E -01
200
2009 A9.11Unl Trades
D Agricultural Equipment
2W1
5.15
34.08
54.32
5.83E 41
0.00E -00
2.4E-04
SBBE 01
195
2008 Agr'rutlual Trades
D AgneAunl Equipment
Me
25.75
33.58
5354
5.74E 41
0.00E -w
248E-04
5.7E -01
192
2008 AgriOutlunl Tmet.
0 Agnculunl Equipment
1999
25.42
3313
52.93
5.67E 41
0.00E -W
252E-04
5 .72E -01
189
2008 Agncutlural Teint.
D Ameeltunl Equipment
1990
24.83
32.36
5222
553E -01
O.WE -W
3.17E -04
580E -01
185
2000 AgncuRUrat Traders
D Agm,u uml Equipment
1997
38.85
50.63
8183
8.88E -01
0.0E4W
5.14E -04
577E -01
290
2008 Agrkutlural Tmdes
D Agnculural Equipment
1996
45.55
5937
%1
1.02E -00
0.00E -00
624E-0t
1wE4W
341
2008 Ag1kURUral Tmtt.
D Agnculual Equipment
1995
5.04
34.98
587
5.90E -01
0.00E+00
300E-14
6.WE -01
51
2009 AgrkuXUml Tuners
D Agneulurat Equipment
1993
11.05
1544
25.12
2.64E -01
0.00E +w
139E-04
280E -01
89
508 A9rkuRUral neet.
D Annulunt Equipment
1992
17.23
2245
36.57
3.84E +1
000E -W
2.68E -64
1WE +1
129
2000 Agrkutlural Tend.
D Agnculuit Equipment
1991
9.0
12.94
21.1
221E -01
O.M-W
1.59E -04
225E -01
74
2000 A9ncununl Trades
D Agncutluent Equipment
1990
7.19
9.37
15.31
180E -01
O.00B00
1.19E -01
183E41
S4
2000 AgmuiluralTmdaz
D AgrkuRUenl Equipment
1909
6.42
8.37
1369
1.43E -01
OBE +W
1.00E-01
145E -01
48
2009 AgrkunumlTmcles
D Agncuftnal Equipment
1980
5.85
7.82
1249
1.30E -01
000E-00
182E-01
1.32E -01
44
2000 Agncunuminintm
D Agncumeed Equipment
1987
098
6.16
10.61
1.10E 41
080E-00
9.WE -05
1.12E -01
37
2008 AgrkuRUUl Trades
D Agncutlund Equipment
1 W
439
5.72
9.4
977E -W
O.WE +W
823E -05
995E -02
33
2008 AgnwWnl Trades
D Agnwtlural Equipment
1985
188
5.05
833
881E -02
0.00E-00
216E -05
880E -02
29
2000 Agtlwlural Trdes
0 Agncutlural Equipment
1964
3.3
4.31
211
7.37E 42
0.00E -W
6.51E -05
Z5E-02
25
2000 Agnwlunl Trades
0 AgncuXUral Equipment
1983
267
3.18
574
5.95E 02
0.00E +W
5.29E -05
6EE -02
20
2000 Agticultuid Trades
D A9.Mun1 Equipmenl
1982
2.16
282
465
4.82E-02
000E+00
429E -05
4.91E -02
16
2008 Agricultural Teel.
D AgncuRUnl Equipment
1981
1.59
2.07
342
354E-02
080E-00
3.1E 415
3.61E -02
12
2000 Agricunural T.U.
D Agricutlunl Equipment
1980
127
1.E-
274
283E-02
0.00E+00
2.52E -05
289E-12
10
2000 Agrnuminl Tmctes
D Agncutlunl Equipment
1979
089
1.16
191
1.9E -W
0.00E -00
I3E -05
202E -02
7
500 A9.11unl Trades
0 AgrkununtIEWipment
1978
0.48
eon
103
1.00E-02
0.00E -w
9.45E -W
1.0E -02
4
2000 AgrkWUnl Tenter
D A9nwRUral Equipment
1977
016
0.21
0.34
35IE +3
O.WE -w
3.15E-06
361E-03
1
2000 Agrkulural Trecle5
D Agricuti Equipment
2008
36.31
47.33
1 %.59
175+00
0.00E -w
3.60E-05
1.72E+00
571
2100 Aglicunurat TraCteS
D Agricunuml Equipment
21107
35.39
46.12
15276
1. 611E+00
0.00E-4w
6.92E -05
188E+00
5%
509 Agncultural Traders
D Agnculluml Equpmem
2D%
33.%
13.76
14498
1.59E +W
0.00E+00
6.9E -05
13E+W
us
508 Agncunurel Traders
D Agncutlumi Equipment
505
3244
4228
14023
1.51E -W
0.00E+00
988E +5
1.54E-4W
510
2000 Agricultural Traders
D AgrkuRUnl Equipment
2001
3201
41.72
138.69
1.52E+00
0.00E +00
1.58E-04
1.55400
504
2000 AgrkuemelTnclds
D AgncuRUnl Equipment
2003
34.91
41.58
1390
151E+00
0.0E-00
3.24E 04
1.55+00
503
2000 AgncuRUnl Tenders
D Agncutlunl Equipment
2002
31.13
40.57
135.71
1.48E +00
O.WE4w
3.25-04
148E+W
491
2000 A rieuRUnl Traetes
D AgncuRUnl Equipment
2001
3015
39.42
131.9
1.43E+00
OWE-00
3.19E-04
161E4W
477
508 AgnculunlTradm
D AgncuRtind Equipment
2000
5.78
30.81
129.89
1.41E -W
O.00E -W
3.4E-04
1,42E -W
470
2008 Agricultural T.IM
D Agncullural Equipmem
1900
NA
38.31
12828
139&00
0.00E -W
322E-04
1AOE400
464
2008 Agrkulural Trades
D Agnwitunal Equipment
1998
532
3743
12534
1.36E -W
O.wE+w
3.2E -04
1.37E+00
453
2008 Aglkulural Traders
D Amcutlumt Equipment
1997
44.93
5036
100.17
2.13E -00
O.UOE+W
5.0E Od
2.14E+00
700
2008 Aglkulunl Trades
D Agnwtlunl Equipment
1996
5288
611.66
MW
2.5E +w
O.00E4W
6.07E64
2.51E+00
032
2008 Aglkuluu red.
D AgnwRuml Equipment
1995
31.04
10.45
135.6
1.47E+W
&(CE -W
161E-01
148E+00
4W
2008 Agnculurat Trdes
D Agrkutlunl Equipment
1003
13.7
1798
5991
6.50E 41
0.0E +00
100E -04
6.54E -01
216
2008 Aneumnel Trades
0 Agnculunl Equipment
1992
19.92
2597
07.12
9.45E -01
000E+00
245E -04
9.50E -01
315
2008 AgrediU ilTueb.
D Agricultural Equipment
1991
11,18
1498
50.21
S."E 41
000E+00
1.44E-04
540E -01
181
2008 Agrkultund TUlctes
D A- cultural Equipment
1990
8.32
lam
36.30
3.94E 41
080E+00
1.00E-04
3.97E -01
131
2008 Agekuund Tudors
D AS cuOUml Equipment
1989
742
988
32.49
3.52EAI
0.00E+00
9.50E 4)5
3.54E 41
117
2008 Agricultural Trades
D AgncuBUml Equipment
1988
878
8.81
29.61
321E -01
0.00E-00
0.06E 4)5
3.23E -01
107
2008 Agncunural Traders
D A9dcu1nl Equipment
1987
5.73
TO
2537
2 .75 -01
0.00E+00
1.11E-04
2.74E -01
91
2008 AgnculturalTmlus
D Agdcunu it Equipment
19W
5.00
6.61
22.45
2.11E -01
0.00E+00
998E -05
2.43E -01
80
2008 A9nwltmal Traders
D Agncutlunl Equipment
1985
448
581
19.06
2.13E -01
OWE +00
893E -05
2.15E -01
71
2008 A ricumun Trad.
D A9ncutluul Equipment
1984
3.82
4.98
16.93
1.81EDI
OWE +W
732E -05
1.83E -01
61
2008 Agricultural Trades
D Agnwlluml Equipment
1983
100
4.00
1360
148E -01
0.00E+00
6.5E 45
148E -01
49
2008 AgrcuMmlTradds
D Agnculuml Equipment
1982
2.5
35
11.07
1.1E -01
0.00E+00
5.07E -05
1211E -01
40
2008 Agrcunural TUCtan
D Agrpunu it Equipment
1981
1.84
2.39
814
8.72E -W
0.00E+00
3.73E -05
8.0E -02
5
2008 Agncununl Traders
D Agmutlunl Equipment
Ism
1.47
1.92
651
6.97E-02
D.00E+00
298E-05
7.91E-02
23
2008 AgnicultunlTmlm
D Agncutlunl Equipment
1979
1.00
1.34
4.56
4.81
000E+00
208E-05
4.93E 42
16
2008 AgmulumlTndes
D Agncutlunl Equipment
4970
eon
012
244
2.62E-02
0.00E -w
1.12E 05
2.61E-02
9
2008 Agrkuluenl Tladan
D Agrku11um1 Equipment
1977
0.18
0.24
081
872E-0S
O.WE+W
3.T3E-06
aWE�03
3
2008 Agricultural Trades
D Agnwllural Equipment
2008
5.45
5.65
150.73
1.616E-011`
0.00E+00
3. %E -05
1. %12+00
550
2wB Agricultural Trades
D Agncutluml Equipment
2007
19.93
25.97
1469
1.6 w
0.00E -w
3.85-05
182E+00
536
208 Agnculunl Traders
D Agncutlunl Equipment
2006
18.91
21.114
1395
1.SE+W
0.00E+00
57E -05
1.59E-00
500
2008 Agnwlunl Traders
D Agneutual Equipment
2W5
1817
23.81
134.79
IAN-00
0.00E +w
5.91E -05
1.40E -00
491
2008 Agricultural Tendons
0 Agrkutlural Equipment
2004
18.0
23.5
133.13
1.46E+W
0.0E+00
7.89E 45
1.16E +W
485
2008 A9ricuRUn1 T.U.
D Agrkuluml Equipment
2003
17.97
23.42
132.84
1.4E +w
0.00E-00
1.14E 44
1.4E -00
404
2008 AglkuRUenl Tncles
D Agrkulural Equipment
502
17153
22.85
130.04
145 -W
0.00E+00
2.13E -64
1.43E+00
473
2008 A9rieumnel Trades
D AgrpuBunl Equipment
2101
17.0
222
1539
130E -W
0.00E+00
2.11E-04
139E+00
459
2wB Agrkulunel Trades
D AgliculWenl Equipment
2000
18.77
21.E
12445
1.3E+00
0.00E+00
2.15+4
137E+00
452
2008 Agrculurel Tncles
O Agricultural Equipment
1999
16.%
21.%
MA
1.64E -W
000E +00
2.13E-04
1.35E+00
446
SW Agncuftum]Trades
0 A9nculturat Equipment
1990
16.17
21.00
15.07
131E+00
&. -w
242E -04
132E -00
436
Agricultural Emissions (Los Gatos as a Percent of the County of Santa Clara's Agricultural Land) - Offroad Year 2008
LY Equipment
Fuel Class
MY
Populatio
I
AdMity
lhourdd.,)
consumple
n
c02EShsuMN20EShau9 CMEsneus, CO2e
CO24
2809 Agr 11unflTned..
2008 Agricultural Tmpors
D Agrrultued Equipment
D Agnculuel Equiorml
1997
25.3
3298
18791
ZWE400
0.00E+0D
3.32E -04
2001400
602
2008 A9ricuXOnlTrado.
D A9nw5und Equipment
1998
1995
29.62
17.48
30.82
200.38
241E+00
0.00E+00
4.02E -04
Z42E400
800
2008 AgricuXmml Traders
D AgriwSU.l Equipment
1993
7.72
2278
1006
129.82
1.42E+0g
0.00E+00
2.41E -04
1.42E+00
421
2000 Agrkuluml Tmdens
D Agriwitual Equipment
1992
1122
57.32
626E 41
0.00100
1.10E -04
8.29E -01
2118
2000 A9kuMuml Tudors
D AgtlwXu it Equipment
1991
8.46
14.62
83.42
9.11E -01
000E+00
162604
9.14E -01
303
2008 AgriuXuml Tndorf
D Agkoftunl Equipment
1990
448
843
81
48.02
5.25E -01
000E+00
9.51E 05
522E -01
174
2008 Apiwtlunl Tudors
D AgncuXUral Equipment
1989
4.18
545
34.83
3.01
0.00E+00
2.00E -05
3.82E 4)1
126
2008 Agricultural Trados
D Agnculla.l EquipmeM
1988
3.81
4.98
$1.1
3.39E -01
0.00E+00
6.35E -05
3.41E 401
113
2008 Aglkultu.l Traders
D AgncuXU.l Equipment
1987
3.23
4.21
28.34
3.09E -01
0.00E+00
582E -05
3.10E -01
103
2008 Aglkulu al Tndan
D Amnulu.l Equipment
1906
IN
3.22
24.22
282E -01
0.00E+00
6.53E -05
263E-01
87
2000 Agrkuluml Tractors
0 Agrkuluil Equipment
1985
2.53
3.29
2143
232E -01
0.00E -00
5.86E -05
233E -01
77
2008 Agricultural Trades
D Agrkultunl Equipment
1984
215
281
1895
2.05E -01
0.00E -W
526E -05
206E -01
fib
2008 Agriculuel Tailors
D Agtl upil Equipment
1993
174
227
16.18
1.75E -01
0.00E+00
488E -05
178E 41
58
2008 Agrkullunl Tmdors
D Agdwllurel Equipment
1982
1.41
13.02
1.41E 4D1
O. W +00
394E 05
1.42E -01
47
2008 Agriculuil Tractors
D Agnwluel Equipment
1981
1.03
183
1%
10.58
1.14E 4)1
0.00E+0O
3.19E -05
1.15E-0f
M
2008 Agriculuml Twine
D Agricultural Equipment
low
083
1.08
778
8.40E-02
0.00E+00
234E -05
845E -02
28
2000 Agricultural Trades
D Agncubu.l Equipment
1979
0.58
O.M
6.22
6.22E -02
0.00E +00
1.08E -05
6.26E-02
22
2000 Agncultunl Tradon
D Agnculturel Equipment
1928
0.31
0.4
436
4.70E -OZ
0.00E+00
1.40E -05
473E -2
16
2008 ApmultualTnctos
D AgncuBU.l Equipment
1977
0.1
113
234
252E-02
0.00E -00
7.48E -M
254E-02
8
2008 Agnculural Tradws
D Agriculluil Equipment
2008
1321
12.22
079
840E -03
O.00E400
2.49E On
8.45E-03
3
2008 Agncueunl Trades
D AgrkuXurd Equipment
2000
1287
1678
13849
1.53E+00
000E+00
3.27E 05
153E +00
508
2008 Agrkuwml Tmdors
D Agrkultunl Equipment
2006
1221
1592
134.97
1.49100
000E+00
353E -05
119E+00
495
2100 Agriculluml Tudors
D Agricultural Equipment
2005
11.8
1538
128.11
1.42E+00
0.00100
412E -05
1.42E+00
470
2008 Agricultural Tudors
D AgnwXunl Equipment
2004
11.65
15.18
123.28
1.32E -M
0.00E+00
4.33E -05
1.37100
454
2008 AgiI;uhunl Tudors
D AgnwBural Equipment
2003
Mill
15.13
122.2
1.35E+00
D.00E+oO
5.02E -05
1.35E+00
440
2009 Agrkultunl Tmdom
D Agn.R..l Equipment
2002
11.32
1478
121.85
1.35E+00
0.00E+00
6.42E.05
1.35E +00
416
2008 Agnculunl Tislws
D Agncumuml Equipment
2001
11
14.34
119.01
1.31E+00
O.WE +W
9.26E 05
1.32E+00
436
2000 Agncusural Trad..
D A9rkulu ml Equipment
Otte)
-
10.83
14.12
11505
1.28100
0.00100
9 W 05
128E+00
423
2008 Agricultural Traders
0 AgiiclMurd Equipment
1999
10.69
13.94
11382
1.28E+00
060E+00
9 20E 05
126E -W
417
2008 Agninluml Tractors
0 Agn"mod Equipment
1998
10.45
1361
11243
124E+00
060E +w
925E -05
124E+00
411
2000 Agnwlinl Tudors
D AgrkuSusi Equipment
1997
1834
21.3
109.83
1.21E+00
0.00E+00
920E -05
121100
402
2008 Agricultural Tndon
D Agnculu.l Equipment
1996
19.16
24.98
121.08
1.9012.00
0.00E+00
1.46E-04
1.90E+00.
629
2008 Agncultunl Tioub.
D Agn<uluel Equipment
1995
1129
14.72
201.53
222E 400
0.00E+00
1.75E 04
2.23E+00
232
2008 Apiculural rraame
D AgmuMnel Equipment
1993
4.99
6.5
119.92
1.31E400
0.00E+00
222E -04
131100
435
2008 Agrkultuml Tndon
D AgncuXUnl Equipment
1992
725
9.45
5292
5.78E -01
000E+00
1.02E -M
5.81E -01
192
2008 AgrkuXuel Trades
D Agnwllunl Equipment
1991
4.18
5.41
T7M
8.41E -01
000100
1.50E -04
8.44E -01
2n
2008 Agrkultuml Tradom
D Agrkuhurd Equipment
1990
3.02
3.00
44.39
4.81E -01
000E+00
878E -05
4.86E -01
161
2008 Agrrullu it Tudors
D Agnaultud Equipment
1989
27
152
32.18
3.51E-01
0.00E-00
6.48E -05
352E -01
117
2008 Agricultural Tmpors
D Agmullural Equipment
1988
2.48
321
28.72
3.13E -01
0.00E +W
5.88E -05
3.15E -01
100
2009 Agrkuemal Tndan
D Agncullural Equipment
1987
2.00
272
26.17
2.85E 4D1
0.00E+00
5.42105
282E -01
95
2008 Agricultural Toulon;
D Agnculturel Equipment
1906
1.81
2.4
2236
242E -01
060E+00
6.03E -e5
2.43E -01
81
2000 Agnculurd Tendon
D Agimulural Equipment
1985
1.63
2.13
1979
214E -01
0.001400
5.41E -05
2.15E 41
71
2000 AgnouXaal random
D Agricultural Equipment
1984
1.39
1.81
125
1.88E4i
0.00E+00
4.86E -05
1.90E -01
W
2108 Agricultural T.d.
D Agnculuel Equipment
1981
1.12
1.48
14.W
1.61E -01
0.00E+00
4 .48E -05
1.82E-01
54
2008 Agrkueu it Tmdas
D Agricultural EquipmeM
1982
0.91
1.15
12.07
1.30E -01
O.WE+W
3.64E -w
1.31E 4D1
43
2008 Agnwlu ilTndors
D AgncuXUrd Equipment
1981
0.82
0.87
9.77
1.05E -01
0.00E+00
2.94E -05
1.00E -01
35
2008 Agdculuel Tradws
D Agncueurd Equipment
1900
0.53
0.7
7.18
7.76E-W
0.00E+00
2.12E -05
2.80E-02
26
2000 Agricultural Tenders
D AgrimMund Equipment
1979
0.37
0.49
575
6.20E-02
0.00E+00
1.ME -05
6.21E-02
21
2000 Agnculu.l Traders
D Agnwitunl Equipment
1978
02
026
4.03
4.34E-02
O.WE+00
129E 05
4.37E-02
14
2000 AgnculunlTradens
D AgdwXmd Equipment
1972
0.97
0.00
2.16
2.33E-02
000E +00
8.81E -W
231E -02
8
2008 AgncuBuml Tmdm
D AgnwXural Equipment
2008
262
342
072
776E-03
0.00E+00
2.30E -W
7.90E -00
3
2006 Agncu3ural Tradom
D AgncuBuel Equipment
2007
2.58
3.33
44.99
4.98E -01
0.00E+00
100E -05
4.9BE-01
185
2008 Agrkultu ilTndon
D Agdouluml Equipment
2006
2.13
3.16
43.84
4.85E -01
O.00E+W
1.15E -05
4.85E -0i
151
2008 Aglrrullural Tndon
D Agrkuluml Equipment
21105
234
3.00
4181
4.00E -01
000E+00
1.19E 45
4.61E -01
153
2000 Ag. Ru.l Trade.
D Agiculmd EquipmeM
2004
231
301
402
4.45E -01
000E+00
125E -05
4.45E -01
147
2000 Agncultural Tradws
D Agriculu el Equipment
2033
231
3
39.89
4.39E -01
0.00E+00
1.48E -05
4.39E -01
145
2000 AgrkuXU.l Trade.
D Apiwltunl Equipment
2002
225
293
39.58
4.32E -01
000E +00
1.56E -05
4.38E -0l
145
2008 AgikuXurd Tudors
D Agrkulu.l EquipmeM
2001
2.19
285
30.61
4.27E 41
0.00E +W
1.74E -05
427E -01
141
2008 AtrkulmralTadors
D Agnculural Equipment
2000
2.15
2.8
37.53
4.15E -01
0.00E-00
209E -05
4.15E tl
137
2008 Apr ftusiTndos
D A96.11.1 Equipment
1999
2.12
2.71
38.98
4.08E 401
0.00E -00
2.11
4.01
135
2008 AgdcuituralTecton
D Agnculural Equipment
1998
2.07
2.7
38.51
4.03E-01
0.00E+00
2.87E-05
4.04E 401
134
2008 Agrkaltural Tied.
D Agriwl ed Equipment
1997
325
423
MA7
3.04E -01
000E+00
2.85E -05
3.94E -01
131
2008 Agricultural Tractors
D Agliwltural Equipment
1996
3.81
Will
6.16E -01
0.00E+00
4.52E -05
6.12E -01
201
2000 Agncu8unl Tradws
D Agncultund Equipment
1995
224
4.96
292
65.45
722E -01
0.00E+00
5.37E -05
223E -01
240
2008 Agricultural Tradws
D Agncultunl Equipment
1993
0.99
129
38.93
426E -01
IME•00
6.81E -05
4.27E41
141
2008 Agikuhunl Traders
D Agnwlural Equipment
1992
1.46
1.88
17.19
1.88E -01
0.013E+00
3.09E -05
1.09E -01
62
Z98B Agikultural Tndon
D Agncuffural Equipment
1991
0.83
1.00
25
273E -01
O.WE-W
4.55E -05
274E -01
91
2008 Agricultural Tmpors
D AgnwSunl Equipment
1900
0.6
078
14.4
1.520 411
0.00E -00
2.65E -05
i.SBE -01
52
2008 AgricusuralTradon
0 AgricuSUral Equipment
1989
054
07
10.11
1.14E 4)1
060E+00
1.95E 05
1.14E -01
38
2008 AgMUNUnl Traders
D Agd fturd Equipment
1988
0.49
084
9.32
1.02E -01
0.000+00
176E 05
102E -01
34
2008 Agricultural Tmdo.
D All k ftu sl Equipment
1987
0.41
0.54
8.49
922102
0.00100
162E -05
9.31E-02
31
2008 AgncuhunlTraden
D Agnculuml Equipment
1986
0.32
0.48
7.4
2.86E -02
060100
1.72E -05
7.90E -02
26
2008 AgncuXmalT.dan
D Agnculunl Equipment
1985
0.32
0.42
655
8.95E-02
0.00100
164E -05
6.99E -02
23
2008 Agmuliural Tudors
D Agnculuel Equipment
1904
028
Otte
58
6.15E-02
0.00E -W
1.38E-05
6.18E-02.
M
2008 Agmullu it Tendon
D Agriwmunl Equipment
1983
022
029
488
524E-02
0.000400
1.27E -05
5.27E-02
12
2008 Agriculture Trdon
D Agdsuftural Equipment
1962
0.18
0.24
4
423E-02
000100
1.03E -05
4.25E -W
14
2008 Agrkullural Tradors
D ApncuXural Equipment
1981
0.13
0.17
324
3.43E-0Z
000E+00
8.35E -W
320E -02
11
2008 Agricultural Tractor
D Ag.Ru.l Equipment
1980
0.11
0.14
238
2.52E-02
0.00E4
8.14E -W
2.53E -02
8
2008 AgriweunlT.do.
D AgncuXUral Equipment
1929
0.07
0.1
191
2.02E -W
O.WE+W
4.91E -00
2.03E-02
7
2008 Agriwlunl Tradors
D Agncumuld EquipmeM
1928
0.04
0.05
131
1.41E -02
060E+00
3.63E -%
1.12E -02
5
2008 Agnwluil Trecmn
D Agricultural Equipment
Ion
0.01
0.02
Olt
7.56E -03
0.00E+00
1.94E -06
7.60E -03
3
2006 Combines
D Agikunuml Equipment
ION
077
0.32
024
252E-03
060E -00
6.OBE -07
2.53E-03
1
21)3B Combines
D AgrkuBUml Equipment
2007
075
1.36
1.49E-02
0.00E+00
2.%E -07
1.49E-2
5
2008 Combines
D A96WKUMI Equipment
2006
071
0.31
0.29
1.32
1.48E-02
000E +0
5.51E -07
1.46E-02
5
Combines
Agnw2uml Equlpmem
2005
0.68
028
1.2fi
1.38E-02
0.00E+W
533E -07
1.38E -02
5
2000 Enes
D Agnwpurel Equipment
2004
0.68
0.28
122
1.33E-02
O.WE+W
2.58E -02
131E-02
4
2008 Combines
D AgmuXUml EquipmeM
2003
0.67
0.28
12
1.32E-02
0.00E+00
1.22E-06
1.32E-02
4
2008 Combines
0 Agricultural Equipment
2102
0.66
12
1.31E -02
0.00E+00
2.59E-06
192E-02
4
ION COmbnee
D Agncutluni Equipment
ZWt
0.27
1.18
128E-02
0.00E+00
2.54E -W
1.29E-02
4
161
026
1.14
1.24E-02
000E -00
Z48E -00
1.25E -02
4
Agricultural Emissions (Los Gatos as a Percent of the County of Santa Clara's Agricultural Land) - Offroad Year 2008.
Populalb Ability COnsumpho
1M1mrLtlael CO2 Eelibi N2O Eabaust CM Exhaust CO2e CO2s
2000 Combnes
D Agriculural Equipment
2000
0.63
026
1.12
1.23E 42
0.00E+00
246E-06
1.23E -02
2000 Combines
D Agricultural Equipment
1999
0.62
028
1.11
121E-02
000E+00
245E-06
121E-02
2000 Combines
D Agricultural Equipment
1990
0.61
025
108
1.111E-02
000E +00
2.40E-0fi
1.19E -02
2000 Combines
D AgricuNuml Equipment
1997
0.95
0.39
1.7
1.85E-02
OWE +W
3.79E -10
1.06E -02
2010 Combines
D Ayrpuffuml Equipment
1996
1.11
0.46
1.99
217E 42
0.00E +W
4.47E -W
218E-02
2010 Combines
D Agricultural Equipment
1995
0.66
027
1.17
120E-02
0.1111E +W
265E -W
1.26E -02
2009 Combines
D Agricultural Equipment
1993
029
0.12
0.52
5.61E-03
000E +W
1.10E -10
5.88E -03
2008 Combines
D AgMUtoal Equpment
1992
0142
0.17
035
8211E -03
0110E +W
1.73E -10
823E -0
2008 Combines
D Agricultural Equipment
1991
024
0.1
0.43
4.72E -03
0.110E +00
100E-06
4.74E-03
2006 Combines
D Agricultural Equipment
1990
0.18
0.07
0.31
3.42E -03
O.DOE +W
7.32E -07
3.44E-03
21100 Combines
D Agricultural Equipment
1989
0.16
0.06
0.28
3.05E -03
0.00E+00
6.50E -97
3.07E-03
2008 Combines
D Agricultural Equipment
1900
0.14
008
026
2.78E-03
0.00E +W
603E -07
2.00E-03
21108 Continues
D Ag0o2uml Equipment
19,117
0.12
0.05
022
230E-03
000E +00
TAME -07
237E-00
2008 Combines
D A9d.utura1 Equipment
1986
0.11
001
0.19
209E-03
0.00E +00
6fi5E -97
2.10E-03
2008 Comber.
D Agncutuml Equipment
1985
0.09
0.06
0.17
1.84E-0S
O.WE+W
5.92E -07
1.861
2008 Combines
D Agricultpal Equipment
1984
0.08
0.00
0.15
1.57E 43
000E+00
5.07E -97
1.50E-03
2008 Combines
D AgocuNUml Equipment
1983
0.07
0.00
0.12
1.27E-03
O.WE+W
4.12E -07
1.20E-03
2008 Combines
D Agncuffural Equipment
1982
0.05
0.02
0.1
1.O3EO3
000E +00
338E-07
101E-03
2008 Combines
D Agnwrnmel Equipment
1901
0.01
O.W
007
750E-01
000E +00
248E -07
781E-01
2000 Combines
D Agricultural Equipment
1900
0.03
0.01
008
805E -01
000E+00
200E -07
809E-0d
2000 Combines
D Agnwllural Equpment
1979
0.02
O.Oi
0.01
423E -M
0.00E +W
IAIE -07
426E-01
2010 Combines
D Agncultural Equpment
1970
0.01
0
002
227E-01
0.00E+10
7.50E-03
2.28E -W
2000 Combines
D Agricultural Equipment
1977
0
0
001
7.56E -05
0.00E+00
2.51E-00
7.61E-05
2000 Combines
D Agricultural Equipment
2000
1.14
0A7
2.65
2.92E-02
000E+00
570E -07
282E-02
2008 Combines
D Agricultural Equipment
2007
1.11
0.48
2.58
284E-02
000E+00
503E -07
284E-02
2000 Combines
D Agricultural Equipment
20D8
105
0.43
245
270E-02
0.00E+00
9.113E -07
2.70E-02
2108 Combines
D Agricultural Equipment
Mi
1.02
0.42
237
260E -02
0.00E+00
8.73E -97
261E-02
2000 Combines
D Agnwltural Equipment
2004
1
0.41
2.31
257E -02
0.00E +10
1.18E-00
2.57E -02
21819 Cwnbines
D Agricultural Equipment
2W3
1
0.41
2.33
256E-02
0.00E+00
134E -W
2.57E 02
2006 Combines
D Agricultural Equipment
2002
0.90
04
2.26
250E-02
000E+0p
340E -W
251E 42
2018 Combines
D Agricultural Equipment
2001
095
0.39
222
243E.02
000E+00
333E -00
211E -02
2008 Combines
D Agricultural Equipment
2000
0.93
on
218
239E -02
0.00E+00
330E -06
2.40E-02
21818 Combines
D Agncunuml Equipment
1999
0.92
0.38
2.16
2.36E -02
0.00E+10
320E-06
237E-02
2000 Combines
D AgnwXUml Equipment
1998
0.9 -
017
2.11
2.31E-02
0.00E+00
322E-06
231E-02
2000 Combnes
D Agncuffural Equipment
1997
141
058
3.3
381E-02
000E+0D
506E -w
382E-02
2009 Combines
D Agnwltural Equipment
1996
165
088
IN
423E -02
000E+00
599E-06
4.24E-02
2008 Combines
D Agriwtural Equpment
1995
097
04
228
249E -02
000E+00
3.55E -10
2.50EM
2006 Combines
D Agnwlturn Equpment
1993
043
0.18
1.01
1.10E -02
0.00E+00
1.59E-00
1.10E-0Z
2000 Cembimes
D Agncuthral Equipment
1992
0.62
on
1.46
1.60E -02
0.00E+10
2.32E -10
160E-0Z
2008 Cambers
D Agricultural Equipment
1991
0.38
0.15
ON
922E -03
000E+00
135E -06
925E4q
2008 Combines
D Agricultural Equipment
1990
028
0.11
061
688E -03
000E+00
092E -97
670E-0S
2008 Combines
D Agrnutural Equipment
1989
023
0.1
051
598E-09
O.WE +00
6112E -07
5.90E-03
2000 Combines
D AgncuBUral Equipment
1911M
021
ON
OS
SASE -01
0.00E +m
8.08E -07
5.45E -03
2000 Combines
D Agncultural Equipment
1907
0.10
0.07
0.42
4.60E-0J
0.00E+0D
8.92E -07
4.62E -03
2000 Combines
D Agncultural Equipment
1906
0.16
007
0.37
4.00E-03
0.00E +00
7.94E -07
409E 43
2008 Combines
D Agricultural Equipment
1905
014
008
033
360E-03
600E+0D
206E -07
382E -03
21100 Combines
D AgnwNUrel Equipment
1994
012
0.05
028
3.07E -03
0.00E+00
647E -07
3011E-03
2000 Combines
D Agncupmal Equipment
1961
0.1
0.01
0.23
2.48E -03
0.00E+10
525E 07
2.49E-03
2000 Combines
D Agricultural Equipment
1982
000
0.03
0.18
201E -10
0.00E+10
428E.07
2.02E-03
2000 Combines
D Agncuffural Equipment
1981
006
002
0.14
1.40E -03
0.00E+00
3.18E -07
148E -03
2008 Combines
D Agn.ftu.1 Equipment
1980
0.05
002
011
1.10E -03
aDOE +00
255E -07
119E -03
2000 Combines
D Agricultural Equipment
1979
003
001
000
826E-01
0.00E +00
101E -W
830E-04
2000 Combines
D AgncuBUml Equipment
1970
0.02
001
004
443E-01
0.00E+00
1.03E -07
445E-04
2000 Combos.
D Agincultural Equipment
1977
0.01
0
0.01
1ABEM
O.WE +00
344E -08
1.48E-01
2000 Combines
D Agncultural Equipment
2018
122
0.5
3.97
4.39E-02
000E+10
0.70E -07
4.39E -02
2008 Combnes
D Agncultural Equipment
2007
1.19
049
3.87
428E-02
000E+00
038E -07
4.28E-02
2000 Combines
D AgriwMUnl Equpment
2006
112
0.18
367
4.10E -02
ODDE+OD
101E -W
4.06E 42
2009 Combines
D Agricultural Equpment
2005
109
015
3.51
392E -02
0.00E +00
101E -05
392E-02
2000 Combines
D Agricultural Equpment
2004
1.07
0.41
15
3.87E -02
0.00E +W
116610
3.87E-02
2008 Combines
O Agricultural Equipment
2003
1.00
ou
349
386E -02
0.00E +W
1.54E 10
3.86E -02
2008 CanWres
D Agricultural Equipment
2002
104
0.43
3.41
336E -02
0.00E +W
2.41E -W
3PE-02
2108 Combines
D Agricultural Equipment
2101
1.01
DAP
331
3.66E -02
O.pUE +10
2.36E -10
3.66E-02
2010 Combines
D A9rkuMUral Equipment
2DD0
1
041
328
3.80E-02
0.00E+00
231E -06
3.60E-02
2009 Combines
D Agricultural Equipment
1999
0.98
0.41
322
355E-02
0.00E+00
232E -W
3&Mi-0
21108 Combines
D Agricultural Equipment
ime
0,116
OA
314
347E-02
000E +00
2.28E -00
3.48E-02
2008 Combines
D Agncultoral Equpmenl
1997
1.5
0.62
4.92
5.43E -02
000E +W
3.00E -W
5.41E-02
2008 Combines
D Agncuffural Equipment
1996
In
0.73
5.77
6.37E-02
0.10E +00
4.24E -06
6.38E -02
2108 Combines
D Agnwltural Equpment
1995
1.04
0A3
343
335E -02
O.WE +W
5.35E -06
3 .76E-02
2000 Cambmes
D Agncutural Equipment
1993
0.45
DAII
1.51
166E-02
000E+00
239E-06
1.88E-02
2009 Cambmes
D Agnwtural Equipment
1992
067
0.27
22
241E -02
000E+00
3.50E -05
242E-02
2018 Cambmes
D Agncutural Equipment
1991
038
0.16
127
1.39E -02
OWE +00
2.03E -W
139E 42
ZOOS Combines
D A9riw0utal Equipment
1990
028
0.11
0.92
1.01E -W
ONE+W
1.48E -00
1.01E-02
2000 Combines
D Agncuibral Equipment
1909
0.25
0.1
0.82
0.97E -W
0.00E+0D
1.33E-06
000E-0B
2000 Combines
D Agricultural Equipment
1900
023
000
075
8.17E-03
0.00E +W
122E-06
8.20E-03
2000 Cambmes
D Agnwltual Equipment
1987
0.19
ON
000
8.93E-03
000E+00
134E -00
8.98E-03
21108 Combines
D AgnwMUral Equipment
1905
0.17
0.07
058
8.13E -03
000E+00
1.19E -05
6.16EN
2006 Combines
D Agricultural Equipment
1985
OAS
DAB
05
5.02E -03
000E+00
1.DMFEW
S.ME.W
2008 Combines
D Agricultural Equpment
1984
0.13
D.O9
043
4.62E-0S
O.00E+00
9.73E -97
684E -03
2008 Combines
D Agncuffural Equipment
1961
0.1
004
0.34
3 .73E -03
0.00E+10
7.91E -07
3.75E -03
2008 Combines
D AgrnuNu.1 Equipment
1982
ON
0.03
020
3.02E -03
000E+10
614E -07
3.03E-03
2008 Combines
D Agricultural Equipment
1981
ON
0.0]
02
2 2E-W
0.00E+00
476E -07
223E -03
2106 Combines
D Agricultural Equipment
1980
0.05
002
0.16
1.78E+03
000E+00
383E -07
1 ,79E 43
2000 Combines
D Agricutural Equipment
1979
0.03
0.01
Oil
124E -W
000E+0p
2.07E -07
125E 43
2008 Combines
D Agmultpral Equipment
1978
0.02
001
008
6.66E-01
OWE+W
1.55E -07
890E-0t
2008 Combines
D Agncubmil Equipment
1977
0.01
0
O.W
222E-04
O.WE +W
5.18E-0B
2.23E-01
2008 Combines
D Agnwnural Equipment
2008
0.0
0.02
023
2AfE 4)3
0.00E +00
4.78E -08
2.41E-03
2000 Combines
D Agncuffnal Equipment
2007
0.05
0.02
021
235E-03
0.00E+00
482E -08
2.35E.W
2000 Combines
D Agncuffural Equipment
2006
0.04
0.02
0.2
223E -03
000E+00
474E -05
223E-03
2000 Compiles
D Agricultural Equipment
2005
0.01
0.02
0.19
2.15E -W
O.WE+W
4.73E -08
2.16E -03
iota Combines
D Agnwltural Equipment
2004
0.01
0.02
0.19
213E 43
0.00E +W
5 .59E 08
2.13E-0J
Agricultural Emissions (Los Gatos as a Percent of the County of Santa Clara's Agricultural Land) - Offroad Year 2008.
Populetio MtWity consump0o
I noursl6ay) n CO2 Exhaust N20 Exhaust C114 ESbaust cote CO2e
-emenea
D Agnuaual Equipment
2003
ON
002
0.19
212E -03
0.00E+00
5.71E -08
212E -W
2008 Ce.bines
D Agmullual Equipment
2002
0.09
0.02
0.19
201E -03
0.00E+00
6.45E-08
201E -0]
2000 Cambmes
D Agnultuil Equipment
2001
0.01
0.02
0.18
2.01E-03
0.00100
8.19E -08
201E 43
2000 Cambkes
❑ AgrwXural Equipment
2000
001
0.02
0.18
1.94E
0.00E+00
127E 07
1.98E-0J
2008 Combines
D AgrwXural Equipment
1999
0.06
0.02
0.18
1.95E -03
0.00E-00
126E 07
195E-03
2008 Combines
D AgrwXural Equipment
1990
0.04
0.02
0.17
1.91E 43
0.11i
IME -06
1.91E-03
2008 combines
D AgrwXural Equipment
1997
0.08
0.02
027
294E-03
0.011i
1.91E -07
299E-03
2008 Combines
D Agncultural Equipment
1990
0.07
0.03
0.32
150E-03
D.00E+00
2.28EE9
3.60E -03
2000 Combines
D Agncultural Equipment
1995
0.04
0.02
0.19
206E -03
D.00E+00
2.81E-01
2.9E-03
2008 Combines
D Agncutural Equipment
1993
0.02
001
008
9.10E-04
0.00E+00
1.28EE9
9.13E-01
2008 Combines
D Agnubural Equipment
1992
0.03
0.01
0.12
1.32E-0J
0.40E+00
1.87E -9
1.33E-03
2000 Comm.
❑ AgnuBural Equipment
1991
0.02
0.01
007
7.62E-01
0.00E +00
1.00E -01
7.65E-0t
2000 Combines
❑ Agncuaunl Equipment
1990
0.01
0
0.05
5.52E-04
0.00E-00
7.80E-08
551E-01
2000 Combines
❑ Agecultu al Equipment
1909
001
0
0.135
1.93E-01
0.00E-0O
207E -08
4.91E-0t
2008 Combines
D Agncultunt Equipment
1980
0.01
0
0.04
4.49E-01
0.00E-00
6.41E -08
4.50E -04
2008 Combines
D Agnwbunl Equipment
1987
0.01
0
0.01
3.81E-01
0.00E -W
8.61E-08
182E-01
2008 Combines
D Agnw6unl Equipment
1996
0.01
0
0.03
3.37E-04
0.01
005E -08
138E-04
2008 Combines
D AgnwBuml Equipment
1905
0.01
0
0.03
296E-01
0.00E+00
5.30E -08
2.99E -p4
2000 Combines
D Agnultural Equipment
1984
0.01
0
0.02
2.54E-01
0.00E+00
4.93E-08
2.55E -M
2000 Combines
D Agricultural Equipment
1983
0
0
002
205E-04
OAOE+Og
4.00E -W
2.06E -04
2000 Combines
D Agricultural Equipment
1982
0
0
002
1.65E-03
0.00E+00
3.26E -08
1.61E -01
2000 Combines
D Agricultural Equipment
1901
0
0
0.01
122E-04
O.WE +00
2.40E -08
123E-0t
2008 Combines
D Agewaunl Equipment
1900
0
0
0.01
9.76E-05
O.WE +W
193E -08
9.60E -05
2008 Combines
D AgnwBUnl Equipment
1879
0
0
0.01
6.83E-05
0.00E-00
1.43E -08
6.86E-05
2008 Combines
D Agncullu.l EquipmeM
1878
0
0
0
3.66E -05
0.00E +W
7]01-09
3b0E-05
2000 Combines
D Aginuttunl Equipment
197]
0
0
0
122E-05
000E +W
2.58E -09
123Ed5
2008 Balers
D AgnuOural Equipment
2008
0
0
0
8.81E -4E
000E+00
1.38E -10
6.07E-06
2000 Balers
D Agnitural Equipment
0
0
0
6.69E-08
0.00E+00
3.20E -10
830E-06
2000 Balers
D AgnwBUral Equipment
Ml)6
2005
0
0
0
6.15E-06
0.00E+00
3.10E -10
036E-06
2000 Balers
0 AgO,ultuil Equipment
2005
0
0
0
6.15E-06
O.WE+w
4.61E -10
014E -W
2000 Balers
D Agncultunl Equipment
2004
0
0
0
6.05E-06
0.00E +00
3.91E -10
001E-06
2008 balers
D AgnuBuml Equipment
2003
0
0
0
6.03E-06
0.00Ea00
1.19E-09
5.07E-06
2008 Balers
D Agnuauml Equipment
2002
0
0
0
569E-06
O.00E-W
1.74E -09
5.92E-06
2008 Balers
D AgncuBuel Equipment
2001
0
0
0
5.72E-06
000E+00
1.74E-09
5.66E-06
2008 Bales
D Agnultunl Equipment
0
0
0
5.8.3E-06
000E+0p
1.13E -M
5.66E -W
2008 Beers
D Agnultural Equipment
1We
1999
0
0
0
5.56E-06
0.00E+00
1]2E -00
5.4BE-06
2000 Balers
D Agnueurm Equipment
1998
0
0
0
5.43E-06
0.00E -00
2.12E-9
540E-06
2000 Balers
D Agnultural Equipment
1997
O
0
0
0.9U600
0.00100
3.35E-09
0.57E4115
2008 Balers
D AgnuBmal Equipment
1996
0
0
0
9.96E-06
000E-00
3.91E-09
1.04E-00
2008 Balels
D Agreultuel Equipment
1995
0
0
0
5.83E-06
0.00E+00
2.06E-09
2008 Balers
D Agreu8u Equipment
1993
0
0
0
2.59E-06
OOli
1.06E-09
2BIE06
211E-615
2008 Balers
it
D AgriwXual Equipment
1992
0
0
0
3.17E-06
000E+00
1.58E -9
3.80E-06
2000 Balers
0 A9nw[mal Equipment
1991
0
0
0
2.17E-06
DOOE+W
9.09E-10
2.19E-06
2000 Balers
D A9nw0unl Equipment
1990
0
0
0
1.57E-08
O.W1W
6.65E -10
1.59E-96
2000 Balers
D AgnwOUnl Equpmenl
1989
0
0
0
1.44E-08
0.00ED0
B.WE -10
1.62E-06
2908 Balers
D Agn Equipment
1988
0
0
0
126E-00
0.00100
5.52E -10
1.29E-0B
21108 Balers
ftuml
D AgnwBUnl Equipment
1987
0
0
0
1.00E-0fi
0.00E+00
4.63E -10
1.09E-08
2000 Balers
D AgriwXural Equipment
1906
0
0
0
9.59E -07
0.00E-00
1.31E -10
050E -07
2000 Balers
D AgrwXural Equipment
1985
0
0
0
8.48E 47
0.W1W
3.05E -10
05611
2008 Balers
D AgtkuBunl Equipment
1986
0
0
0
7.23E -07
0.00E-00
3.31E -10
734E -72
2000 Balers
D Agnununl Equipment
1903
0
0
0
5.04E -07
0.00E +00
2]0E -10
590E -72
2000 Balers
D Agncuauml Equipment
1982
0
0
0
4]3E -07
090E+00
220E -10
-TIE -72
2008 Balers
D Agnuaunl Equipment
1981
0
0
0
3.68E -07
000E +00
1.61E -10
151E -07
2008 Bale.
D Agnueural Equipment
1960
0
0
0
219E -07
0.00E +00
1.32E-10
2.01E -07
2008 Balers
D AgncuBunl Equipment
1979
0
0
0
1.95E -07
0.00E +00
9.33E -11
1.95E -07
2008 Bales
D AgnuBural Equipment
190
0
0
0
1.01E 47
0.00E+0p
5.04E -11
105E -07
2)W Balers
0 AgriwXural Equipment
194
0
0
0
0.130E-00
1JOE -11
3.51E -00
2008 Balers
D AgrwXural Equpment
20011
1.02
023
O"
725E610
625E -03
O.00Ea00
1.42E -9
)281 -03
2000 Balers
D Agnullu Equipment
209
0.99
026
0.64
7.9E -03
O.OgE -00
269E -0]
7.9E -03
2008 Bak.
el
D Agnullural Equipment
2008
0.91
025
0.51
6.41E-03
0.00E-00
253E -07
6.61E -03
2008 Balers
D Agriwlluet Equipment
2005
0.91
021
0.59
8.49E -W
000E+00
3.fi0E -07
6.49E -03
2008 Beers
D Agnumunl Equipment
2003
0.9
023
0.50
8.39E-03
0.00E+00
5.81E -07
6.41E -03
2008 Bales
D AgrkuBu Equipment
2003
09
023
0.56
6.36E-03
O.00E00
1.21E-06
620E-03
2000 Balers
it
D Agnw8unl Equipment
2002
0.815
0.23
053
622E-03
0.00E +W
121E o6
024E -03
2008 Bak.
D AgnuOuml Equipment
2001
0.05
0.22
0.55
6.91E-03
0.00E -00
1.10E -06
801E -03
2008 Bale.
D A~uml Equipment
2000
0.84
0.22
0.55
5.95E -03
0.00E-00
1.11E -06
5.97E-0J
2000 Balers
D AgnuBuml Equipment
1899
0.83
0.22
0,541
5.84E -03
000E -W
1.16E -06
5.901
2000 Balers
D ApnwBU.l Equipment
1998
081
0.21
0.53
5.61E-00
0.00E+0D
1.14E -06
5.16E-03
2008 Balers
D AgOwBunl Equpmenl
1997
126
0.39
082
8.9E-03
O.1ID 00
1.69E -W
8.01E -03
2000 Balers
D AgriwXural Equipment
1996
1.46
0.39
0.97
1.05E -02
O.WEW
2.14E -06
1 -02
2008 Balers
D AgnuOunl Equipment
1995
0.9
0.23
0.9
6.24E -03
0.00Es00
1.24E -W
3E
623E -03
2008 Bales
D Agnulluml Equipment
1993
0.39
0.1
025
2.14E -03
0.00E +00
5.51E -72
2.15E -03
2409 Balers
D Agnuluul Equipment
1992
0.56
0.15
0.31
3.88E-03
0.40E+00
8.09E -9
-3
2018 Balers
D Apmultunl Equipment
1991
0.32
021
229E-0J
OOYE+W
4.40E -07
230E-03
Z3GE
2008 Baler
D Agnultunl Equipment
1900
023
Mi
0.15
1.66EJM
000E+00
3.40E -72
1.9E -03
2008 Balers
D Agn Equipment
1989
021
0.00
0.05
014
1.48E-03
0.04E +00
3.05E -72
1.19E -03
2008 Balers
peal
D AgriwXural Equipment
1900
0.19
0.05
0.12
1.35E-03
0.00E+00
2.79E -07
1.35E -03
2008 Balers
D Agrulleal Equipment
1907
0.18
0.04
011
1.15E,03
O.WE +00
3.15E -07
1.15E -03
2000 Balers
D Agnwbu.l Equipment
1986
0.13
094
0..W
1.01E -W
0.00E-00
272E -72
1.02E -0J
2000 Bale.
D AgnuBund Equipment
1985
0.13
096E -04
0.00E-00
262E -07
001E-04
2000 Bak.
D AgnwBuel Equipment
1961
0.11
0.00
O.W
0.07
O.0]
763E -W
0.00E+00
233E -9
6.68E634
2008 Balers
D AgnwBunl Equipment
1983
009
0.02
ON
8.13E-04
0.00E -W
1.89E -07
5.21E -4
2008 Beers
D A9MORual Equipment
1902
0.07
0.02
005
4.99E-0t
000E +00
1.54E -72
5.02E-0C
2000 Balers
D AgnuBual Equipment
1901
O.W
0.01
3.81E-04
OWE -00
1.13E -07
169E-0t
2000 Bales
D A9.11mal Equipment
1979
0.01
0.01
0.03
0.0]
2.94E-0t
0.1
9.10E-08
206E-0C
2008 Balers
D Agnwau.l Equipment
1979
0.01
0.02
206E-0t
0.00E+00
6.40E -08
207E-0C
2008 Balers
D AgnwOnl Equipment
190
0.02
0.02
0
091
110E-01
0.00E+0U
146E -W
1.11E -04
2008 sale.
D AgnwBunl Equipment
1971
0.01
0
0
3.61E -0
0.00E-00
1.15E -08
169E -05
2028 Agnuaunl Mowers
D Agkukural Equipment
2008
0.00
O.W
006
835E-00
0.00E+00
1.64E -08
8.35E-04
2008 Agnuttunl Mowe.
D AgncMUnl Equipment
2007
005
0105
007
8.13E-04
0.00E+00
326E -0e
0.16E-04
Agricultural Emissions (Los Gatos as a Percent of the County of Santa Clara's Agricultural Land) - Offroad Year 2008.
PopuMW
AcINKI,
Con4umptio
CY Equipment
Fuel Client
MY
n
Ihwramayl
n
CO2 Exhaust MM Exhaust
CM ERMust
Cale
D02e
2008 AgmvXural MOeers
D Agricullunl Equipment
2006
0.04
0.04
0.07
7.72E-04
000E+00
324E-08
7.72E-04
0
2008 Agrpultural Mowers
D Agriti Equipment
2005
0.01
000
O.D7
7.46E-04
000E+00
4.59E-09
7ArE-01
0
2000 Agriki Mowers
D AgrpuXuml Equipment
2004
001
ON
0.07
7.36E-01
0.00E+00
7.31E -08
7.37E-01
0
2009 Agricultural Mowers
0 Agricultural Equipment
2003
0.01
0.04
007
7.33E-04
0.00E+00
1.53E -07
7.37E-04
0
2008 Agricultural Mowers
D Agricultural Equipment
2002
0.04
ON
DOI
7.16104
080E +W
1.51E -07
7.19E-01
0
2008 Agrkueuml Mowers
D Agricultural Equipment
2001
0.04
0.04
ON
895E-01
000E-00
1A9E -07
6.90E-01
0
2008 Agmueuml Mowers
D Agriweural Equipment
2000
0.04
0.04
am
6.81E-04
000E+00
149E -07
8.88E-01
0
2008 AgnwRural Mmwere
D AgOCUltural Equipment
1999
ON
004
086
6.76E -04
0.00E+00
1.49E -07
639E-04
0
2008 Agncuiu it Mowers
D Agnwltural Equipment
1990
ON
0.04
0.06
6.60E-01
O.00E400
1ASE W
683E-04
0
2000 Agricultural Mowers
0 AgncuRural Equipment
1997
0.08
0.08
009
1.03E -03
000E +W
2.35E 07
1.01E -03
0
2000 Ag&Ultuml Mowers
0 Agricultural Equpmem
1996
0.07
0.07
011
121E-03
0.00E+00
2.79E -07
122E -03
0
2008 Agriwhural Mowers
D Agricultural Equpmem
1995
004
004
0.07
7.13E-01
0.00E+00
1.67E -07
7.17E-01
0
2008 Agricultural Mowers
D AgricuRUml Equipment
1993
0.02
0.02
0.03
3.15E-04
000E+00
7.56E -08
3.17E-04
0
2008 Agricultural Mowers
D A9ncultuml Equipment
1992
003
0.03
004
4.58E-04
0.00E+00
1.11E -07
4.60E-04
0
2008 Agricultural Mowers
D AgncuXuml Equipment
1991
0.02
0.02
002
2.61E-04
0.00E400
6.50E -08
265E-04
0
2000 Agricultural Mowers
D Agricultural Equipment
1990
0.01
0.01
002
1.91E-04
0.00E+00
437E -08
1.92E-01
0
20091grkuRuml Mowers
❑ Agricultural Equipment
1989
0.01
0.01
002
1.71E-01
0.00E+00
4.31E -08
132E-01
0
2008 Agmultural MOwem
D AgnwXural Equipment
INS
0.01
0.01
001
1.55E -04
000E +00
3811E-08
156E411
0
2008 Agnpmural Mecums
D Agncultural Equipment
IND
0.01
0.01
001
1.32E -04
000E+00
498E -08
133E-01
0
2008 Agrcuhural Mowers
D Agricultural Equipment
1986
0.01
0.01
0.01
1.17E -04
0.00E+00
4.44E -W
1.18E-04
0
2008 Agricultural Mowers
D Agnwlturel Equipment
1905
0.01
Sol
001
1.03E -04
000E +00
3.98E -W
104E-0t
0
2000 Agncueuml MOters
D AgrkuXural Equpmem
1981
0.01
0.01
001
839E 05
080E+00
3.43E -W
8.86E-05
0
2008 AgriwXU2l Mowers
D Agrkullural Equipment
1983
0
0
0.01
7.10E -05
000E +00
280E-08
7.16E-05
0
2000 AgriwXUral Mowers
D Agncultutal Equipment
1982
0
0
001
534E-05
000E +W
230E-08
579E-416
0
2008 Agrpultural Mowers
D Agntuumil Equipment
1981
0
0
0
422E -05
0.00E+0D
171E-08
426E-05
0
2008 AgrcuRural Mowers
D AgriouBull Equipment
1980
0
0
0
3.38E -05
0.00E+0D
1.36E -W
341E -5
0
2008 Agmultural Mowers
D Agricultural Equipment
1979
0
0
0
2.37E -05
0.00E-00
9.70E -09
2.39E -S
0
2009 Agricultuml Mowers
0 Agricultural Equipment
1970
0
0
0
127E-05
0.00E+00
5.30E -W
128E -05
0
2008 Agricultural Mowers
D Agricultural Equipment
1977
0
0
0
4.22E-06
0.00E+0p
1.79E-09
428E-06
0
2008 Stayers
D AgriwXural Equipment
2000
0.22
0.07
0.04
4.04E -04
0.00E+00
4AOE -W
4.05E-04
0
2008 Sprayers
D Agrieullural Equipment
2007
0.22
0.07
ON
3.93E-01
000E+00
428E-08
394E-04
0
2008 Stayers
D Agrkulluml Equipment
2006
021
0.06
0.03
333E-04
O.00E4W
4.06E-08
334E -04
0
2008 Spanners
D Agneultural Equipment
2005
0.2
008
003
3.81E-01
0.00E+00
393E -08
3.62E-04
0
2008 Stayers
D Agncultuml Equipment
2004
02
0.06
003
356E-414
0 WE +00
4.35E-08
3.57E-04
0
2008 Seaters
D Agricultural Equipment
2003
02
086
003
3.55E-04
000E +W
4.34E -08
356E-01
0
2008 Sealers
D Agricultural Equpmem
2002
0.19
ON
003
3.46E-04
0.00E+00
42310
347E-01
0
2000 Stayers
D A~imll Equipment
2001
0.19
0.00
003
3.36E -04
0.00E+00
4.11E -W
3.37E-04
0
me sueems
D AgnwRural Equipment
2000
0.18
086
003
331E -04
0.00E+00
4.05108
3.32E-01
0
2000 Sprayers
0 Agnwltural Equipment
1999
0.18
0.05
0 W
327E-04
0.00E+00
1.15E -07
3.29E-01
0
2000 Sputters
D Agricultural Equipment
1998
0.18
0.05
OW
3.19E -04
000E+00
1.12E -07
322E-01
0
2008 Stayers
D Agnwltural Equipment
1997
0.28
ON
0.00
5.00E -04
0.00E +00
1.76E -07
503E-0t
0
2008 Sprayers
D Agricultural Equipment
19%
0.33
0.1
0.05
5.86E -04
O.00E400
200E -07
500E-04
0
ZWR Sprayers
❑ AgOwltuml Equipment
1995
OAS
DM
OM
3.45E-04
000E +00
121E -07
3.48E-01
0
2008 Sprayers
0 Agncultural Equipment
1993
O.W
0.00
001
1.57E-04
000E +W
5.35E -08
1.54E-04
0
2000 Sprayers
D A9nwltura1 Equipment
1992
0.12
0.04
002
222E-04
000E+00
778E -W
223E-01
0
2008 Swayers
D Agrkultural Equipment
1991
0.07
0.02
DUI
128Ed
0.00E +00
4.4RE.08
129E-01
0
DOW Swayers
D Agricultural Equipment
1990
0.05
0.02
DOI
9.25E-05
OWE +W
325E -W
9.31E-05
0
2008 sprayers
D Agricultural Equipment
109
0.05
0.01
001
836E -05
0.00E+00
2.3E W
822E 45
0
2008 Sprayers
D Agncultural Equipment
1908
ON
0.01
001
262E-00
OME+W
2.64E -W
Z%E-05
0
2008 Sprayers
D Agricultural Equipment
1907
ON
0.01
001
6.30E -05
OWE +W
2.24E -06
8.42E -05
0
2000 Sprayers
D Agmumnal Equipment
1998
0.3
0.01
0.01
5.64E-05
000E+00
1.00E -08
560E-05
0
2000 Sprayers
D Agricultural Equipment
1985
0.3
0.01
0
4.99E -05
O.WE+W
175E-06
502E -05
0
Me Sprayers
D Agricultural Equipment
1984
O.W
0.01
0
4.25E-05
0.00E+00
1.49E-0
4.28E-05
0
2000 Sprayers
0 Agnwltural Equipment
1003
0.00
0.01
0
3.43E-05
OWE +W
1.21E W
3.16E-05
0
2008 Stayers
D AgricuXUral Equpmem
1982
OM
0
0
2IWA5
OWE+00
9.76E W
280E -5
0
2008 Sprayers
D Agnweund Equipment
1981
0.01
0
0
204E -05
000E+00
7.18E-09
200E-05
0
"a Sprayers
D Agricultural Equpmem
1980
0.01
0
0
1.00E -05
OOOE+W
&74E OR
1.85E-05
0
2008 Stayers
D Agricultural Equpmem
1979
0.01
0
0
1.14E -05
0.00E +00
402E-09
1.15E 45
0
2008 Sprayers
D A9rcuRUral Equ'Omenl
1978
0
0
0
6.13E -06
0.00E+00
2.15E-09
6.18E-08
0
2008 Stayers
D Agreutmel Equipment
1971
0
0
0
2.04E-06
0.00E-00
7.18E -10
200E-06
0
2000 Stayers
0 Agricultural Equipment
2000
0.00
0.01
001
1.41E-01
0.00E +00
2.80E -W
1AIE-04
0
2008 Stayers
D Agricultural Equipment
2007
0.05
0.01
001
1.38E-04
000E +00
6.57E-09
1.36E -01
0
2008 Spayeas
D AgricuXuml Equipment
2006
0.05
DOI
0.01
1.31E-04
O.WE +W
6.30E-09
1.31E-01
0
2008 Sprayers
D Agncuhuml Equipment
2005
OM
Doll
0.01
1.26E-01
000E+00
952E 00
1.26E-04
0
2008 Sprayers
D Agnwhuml Equipment
ZODI
0.04
001
001
125E-04
0.00E+00
183E 08
125E-01
0
2008 Stayers
D AgnwXUral Equipment
2003
0.01
0.01
0.01
1.24E -0.1
0.00E +00
398E -W
1.25E-04
0
2008 Sprayers
D AgncuRural Equipment
202
0.04
001
0.01
121E-04
0.00E +00
382E -08
122E-04
0
2008 Sprayers
❑ Agncultural Equipment
2001
0.04
0.01
001
1.10E -04
0.00E +00
3. %E -O9
1.18E-04
0
2008 Sprayers
D Agnwltmal Equipment
2000
ON
0.01
001
1.IN -04
000E+W
3.54E -08
1.17E-0t
D
2000 Sprayers
D Agrkultmal Equipment
1999
0.04
0.01
0.01
1.14E -04
0.00E+00
3.53E -08
1.15E-04
0
2000 Swayers
D AgkitRural Equpmem
1998
ON
0.01
0.01
1.12E -w
0.00E+00
4.33E -W
1.13E-0I
0
2000 Sprayers
D AgricuXuml Equipment
1997
DOS
0.02
0.02
135E -04
0.00E+0D
8.04E -08
1.76E-04
0
2000 Sprayers
D Agricultural Equipment
1998
0.07
0.02
002
205E-04
0.00E +00
8.10E 08
207E-04
0
2008 Sprayers
D Agricultural Equipment
1995
ON
0.01
001
121E-01
OME +W
482E-0B
122E-04
0
2006 SP.,.
D Agricultural Equipment
193
0.01
0
0
533E -05
000E +W
2.17E -08
5.38E46
0
2000 Sprayers
D AgncuXural Equipment
1992
0.03
0.01
001
7.76E -05
000E.w
319E -08
7.82E -05
0
2008 Sprayers
D Agnculluml Equipment
1991
0.02
0
0
4.47E -05
O.WE+W
185E -W
4.51E-05
0
2008 Stayers
D Agnicueuml Equipment
1990
0.01
0
0
3.24E -05
0.00E+00
1.36E -0
3.27E -05
0
2008 Sprayers
❑ Agnwltural Equipment
INS
0.01
0
0
289E 45
OWE -00
1.22E -08
292E -05
0
2008 Spanners
0 Agreueural Equipment
1989
DOI
0
0
283E -05
O.00E+w
1.12E -08
2.66E -05
0
2008 Stayers
D Agricultural Equipment
1987
0.01
0
0
223E -05
000E +00
9.82E-09
225E-05
0
2009 Sprayers
D AgrkuRmal Equipment
1906
0.01
0
0
1.97E -05
0.00E+00
8.77E-09
1.99E -05
0
2006 Spanners
D Agricultural Equipment
1985
0.01
0
0
1.75E-05
0.00E +00
782E-09
178E-05
0
2000 Sprayers
D Agmuhuml Equipment
1984
Sol
0
0
1.49E -05
0.00E+00
573E-09
1.00E-05
0
2008 Sprayers
D Agncultuml Equipment
193
0
0
0
120E -05
0.00E+00
5.48E -09
1.21E-05
0
2008 Sprayers
0 Agricultural Equipment
1982
0
0
0
933E-06
0.00E+00
4.48E -09
9.82E-06
0
2000 Stayers
0 Agncunural Equipment
1981
0
0
0
715E-06
0.00E+00
3.32E -09
732E-06
0
2008 sprayers
D Agncultund Equipment
1980
D
0
0
572E -011
0.00E+00
268E-09
5.78E-06
0
2008 Swayers
D Agncuhuml Equipment
1979
0
0
0
4.01E 06
0.00E+00
1.89E-09
40 %-06
0
2000 Stayers
D Agrkultuml Equipment
1978
0
0
0
2.15E-06
0.00E +00
102E -09
2.17E-06
0
Agricultural Emissions (Los Gatos as a Percent of the County of Santa Clara's Agricultural Land) - Offroad Year 2008
0Y Equipment
Fuel cuts
811'
popuhtio
n
Pctwity
(hwrslday)
cdnsumpso
in
CO2EShaust N20aluust CH,Ifthmuet
002
COI
2008 Spayers
D Agnculural Equipment
19"
0
0
0
7.15E-0
O.OKi
3ME -10
723E -07
0
2008 Sprayers
D Agnculuml Equipment
2000
O49
0.12
031
3.42E-03
0.00E+00
8.88E-0B
342E-03
1
2008 Sprayers
D Aglicuhunl Equipment
=7
0.47
0.12
0.3
3.33E -03
O.wEW
124E -07
3.34E -03
1
2008 spryers
D AgBwltual Equipment
2008
0.15
0.11
on
3.16E -03
O.00E-W
1.19E -07
3.16E-03
1
2000 spayen
D Agnwhural Equpmem
2005
0.43
0.11
0.28
3.05E -03
0.006w
1.69E -07
3.06E -03
1
2000 sprayers
D Agnwllural Equipment
2004
0.43
0.11
028
3.01E -W
0.00E4w
2.73E -07
3.02E -03
1
2000 Sprayers
D Agnwhural Equipment
2003
0.41
0.11
028
3.00E-03
0.00E+00
5.82E -07
3.02E -03
1
2000 Sprayers
D Agricultural Equipment
2002
042
0.1
O9
203E-03
O.wE+00
570E -07
291E -03
1
2008 Sprayers
D Agncullu it Equipment
2001
0.4
0.1
028
2.85E-03
0.00E+0O
556E -07
206E-03
1
2008 Sprayers
D Agricultural Equipment
2000
OA
0.1
025
2.80E -03
0.00E -w
5.WE -07
282E-03
1
2008 Sprayers
D Agricultural Equipment
1999
0.39
0.1
025
257E-03
0.001
545E 07
2.78E-03
1
2008 Sprayers
D Agncultu al Equipment
1998
0.30
0.09
0.25
2 .70E -03
OME -00
5.35E -07
2.72E-03
1
2000 Sprayers
D Agdwlunl Equipment
1997
0.6
0.15
0.39
4.23E -03
0w1W
8.40E -07
4.25E -03
t
2000 Spmpe.
D Agricultural Equipment
1996
0.7
0.17
0.46
4.96E -03
O.wE-w
9.09E 07
4.98E -03
2
2000 Omani
D Agnwhunl Equipment
1995
0.42
0.1
0.27
2.92E-03
0.110E-00
5.85E -07
2.94E -03
1
2008 Sprayers
D Agricultural Equipment
1993
0.18
0.05
0.12
1.29E-03
O.00E4w
2.60E -07
1.30E -03
0
2WB Sprayers
D Agmutual Equipment
1992
027
OM
0.17
1.80E -03
000E+00
3.80E -07
1.88E -03
1
2008 Sprayers
D Agnwltunl Equipment
1991
OAS
0.01
0.1
I.WEW
O.00E00
220E -07
1.49E-03
0
2008 Sprayers
D Agnwltural Equipment
1990
0.11
0.03
0.07
7.83E-04
O.Wi
160E -07
7.85E-04
0
2000 Sprayers
D Agnwltural Equpmenl
1989
0.1
0.02
ON
6.90E-04
O.00E00
1A3E -07
702E-04
0
2008 Spmyers
D A9nwlturel Equipment
1980
ON
0.02
ON
6.37E-04
O.00E+00
1.31E -07
6.40E-04
0
2000 Spmprs
D Agricultural Equipment
1987
0.08
0.02
ON
5.10E-0I
OAOE00
1.82E -07
5AXllt
0
2WB Sprayers
D Agncultual Equipment
1986
0.07
0.02
ON
4.78E-01
0.00100
1.4E -07
4.81E-04
0
2008 Sprayers
D Agricultural Equipment
1985
0.06
0.01
0.04
422E-01
0.00E+00
128E -07
4.25E-01
0
2008 Speyer,
D Agncultural Equipment
1904
ON
001
003
3.60E-01
O.00E+OO
1.09E -07
3.62E-01
0
2000 speSers
D A9nculturil Equipment
1983
OM
0.01
ON
2.91E-04
000100
&WE 08
283E-01
0
2000 sprayers
D Agnwtlural Equpmem
1902
ON
0.01
002
2.36E-04
000E+00
720E-08
237E-04
0
2008 Sprayers
D Agnwhund Equipment
1901
0.02
0.01
002
1.73E
0.00E-0p
5.31E -08
L74Eal
0
2008 Spate.
D Agnwhural Equipment
1980
0.02
0
0.01
1.38E -01
0.00E-00
427EW
1.39E-04
0
2008 Sprayers
D Agriwltual Equipment
1979
0.01
0
0.01
9.69E -05
0.00E-00
3.00E -W
9.75E-05
0
2008 Sprayers
D Agncuhunl Equipment
1978
0.01
0
0
5.19E 45
0.00E+00
1.61E -08
523E-05
0
2008 Spnyas
D AgWultuel Equipment
19P
0
0
0
1.73E-05
0.00Eb
5.39E-09
1.74E -05
0
2008 Sprayers
D Agnwlural Equipment
2008
02
0.05
022
2.39E-03
OODEnOO
486E -08
2.39E-03
1
2000 Sprayers
D Agirwhuml Equipment
2007
02
0.05
021
2.33E-03
OwE+00
45IE 08
233E-03
1
2008 sprayers
D Agdwhuml Equipment
2006
0.19
0.05
02
221E 43
0.00E+00
7.01E -08
221E-0S
1
2000 Symye.
D Agricultural Equipment
2005
0.18
0.05
OAS
2.13E -03
000E-00
6.90E-00
214E-03
1
;iwa Sprayers
D Agdwhural Equipment
2004
0.18
0.04
0.19
2.11E -03
0.00E-00
9.32E -00
2.11E-03
1
2008 Spreyna
D Agricultural EgWpmem
2003
(p18
eN
0.19
210E 43
O.00E -W
1.38E -07
210E-03
t
2008 Sprayers
D Agricultural Equipment
2002
DAIS
0.01
0.19
205E -03
000E+00
274E -07
205E -03
1
2008 Sprayers
D Agriwltuml Equipment
2001
0.17
ON
0.18
1.98E -03
0.00E4w
2.67E -07
2.00E-03
1
2000 sprayers
D Agricultural Equipment
2OW
0.17
O.Ot
018
1.98E -03
0.00E+00
2.60E -07
1.96E-3
1
2000 Sprayers
D Agrkuhuml Equipment
1999
0.17
0.OI
OAS
1.9315.0
O.00E+OO
252E -07
181E-03
1
2008 Sprye.
D Agriwluml Equipment
1998
0.16
0.04
0.17
1.89E 43
0.00E+00
257E -07
169E-03
1
2008 swayers
D AgncuOunl Equipment
1997
025
086
027
296E -03
O.gOE+OO
4.03E -07
2.96E-03
1
2wB Spryer,
D Armultu it Equipment
1996
0.3
007
on
3.47E+13
O.00E-00
4 -07
348E-03
I
2008 Spinners
D Agncuhural Equipment
1995
0.17
ON
0.19
201E-03
0.00E+00
.74E
2.01E -07
205EW
1
2008 sprayers
D Agricultural Equipment
1993
ON
0.02
ON
9.01E-01
000E+4w
125E -07
9.04E -W
0
2008 Sprayers
D Agnculturel Equipment
1992
0.11
ON
0.12
151E-03
0.01i
1.82E -07
1.31E -03
0
2000 sprayers
D Agnwlturel Equipment
199]
0.06
0.02
0.07
7.55E -04
O.00EbO
1.05-07
7.57E-04
0
;iow sprayers
D Agnwhural Equipment
1900
0.05
e01
0.05
5.0E -Ot
0.00E+00
7.67E -08
5.49E -0
0
2000 Sprayers
D Agncuhund Equipment
1989
ON
0.01
ON
4.88E -01
0.00100
6.87E -08
4.90E-04
0
2008 sprayer
D Agm,ndral Equipment
1988
001
0.01
0.01
4.45E -04
0.00E+00
6.23E-08
4.46E-01
0
2008 Sprayers
O Agriwhurat Equipment
1987
0.03
0.01
003
3.77E-04
O.00E400
6.92E -W
3.79E-04
0
2008 Sprayers
D Agrkultural Equipment
1985
ON
0.01
0.03
3.34E-04
OAWE
8.14E-0B
3.35E-01
0
2008 Sp
D Agnwlturel Equipment
1905
ON
0.01
0.03
2.95E-04
OAOE00
5.45E -08
2.96E-01
0
2008 Sprayers
D Agnwhunl Equipment
19&
ON
0.01
0.02
2.51E-0t
0.00E+00
4.98E -08
252E+04
D
2000 Sprayers
D Agnwltunl Equipment
1903
O.W
0
0.02
2.03E-0I
0.00E+00
4.01E+08
2.01E-04
0
2000 Sprayers
D Agricultural Equipment
1982
0.01
0
O.W
1.00E-04
0.00E+00
3.28E -08
165E-0t
0
see Sprayers
D Agncuhural Equipment
1961
041
0
001
121E-01
000E+00
2.42E -08
1.21E-01
0
2008 Sprayers
D ApiculWral Equipment
190)
001
0
001
9.67E-05
000E+00
1.95E -08
071E-05
0
2008 Spayers
D Agnculknl Equipment
1979
0.01
0
001
657E-05
0.00E-0p
1.45E -08
050E -05
0
2008 Sprayers
D Agrkuluel Equipment
1970
0
0
0
3.63E+05
O.00E00
782E -09
381E -05
0
2008 Sprayers
D Agricultural Equipment
190
0
0
0
121E 45
0.00E-00
2.6Z2-O9
1.21E-05
0
2008 sprayers
D Agricultural Equipment
2008
0.13
003
0.22
245E-03
0.00E-w
4.70E -W
245E -03
1
2008 spl e
D Agncultuml Equipment
2007
0.12
Ow
022
239E-03
0.00E -w
4.76E -08
2.39E -03
1
Me spayeee
D Agneultual Equipment
2006
012
0.03
0.2
226E-0J
000E+00
5.47E -08
2.26EW
1
Me Sprayers
D AgnwXurel Equipment
2005
0.11
0.0
02
219E-03
000100
5.37E -W
2.19E -03
1
2000 Sprayer,
D Agricultural Equipment
2001
0.11
0.03
0.2
215E-03
000100
820E -08
2.16E -03
1
2008 sprayers
D Agnwltund Equipment
2003
0.11
O.w
0.19
2.15E -W
O.00E-OO
8.27608
2.15E -03
1
2000 Sprayers
D Apwltural Equipment
2002
0.11
O.W
0.19
2.10E-03
0.00E+00
1.32E -07
210E43
1
2008 Sprayers
D Agricultural Equipment
2001
0.11
eM
0.18
201E -W
0.00E+00
1.29E -07
2.01E 43
1
2008 Sprayers
D Agricultural Equipment
2000
0.1
0.00
0.18
2.01E -03
eOOEw
1.27E -07
2.01E-03
1
AIN Sprayers
D Agricultural Equipment
1999
0.1
0.00
Ole
1.90E-03
0.00E+00
1.26E 07
188E -03
1
2008 Sprayers
D Agnwlunt Equipment
1998
0.1
0.00
018
1.94E-03
0.00E+00
124E -07
1.94E-03
1
2008 Spaypem
D Agnwlu it Equipment
1997
0.16
0.01
027
3.03E-03
OwEOo
1.91E -07
300E-03
1
2008 Sprayers
D Agnwhunl Equipment
1998
0.19
em
052
3.55E -03
0.01
229E -07
355E -03
1
2000 Sprayers
D Aguwhunt Equipment
1995
0.11
0.00
0.19
2.00E -W
O.00E+Oo
2.881
2.10E-03
1
2008 Sprayers
D Agmuhu it Equipment
1993
0.00
e01
0.00
924E-01
O.00E+W
1.20E -07
9.27ED1
0
2008 Speye.
D Agncultuml Equipment
1992
0.07
ON
0.12
131E-03
0.00E+00
L87E 07
1.35E -03
0
2000 Sprayers
D Agricultural Equipment
1991
0.04
0.01
007
7.74E-04
0.00E+00
1.00E 07
7.76E-04
0
21108 Sprayers
D Agnwltural Equipment
1990
0.03
0.01
005
5.81E-0I
O.00E4
TWEW
582E-01
0
2008 Spayers
D Agnwllural Equipment
1989
0.00
0.01
ON
5.01E-04
gOOE+00
7.04E -08
502E-04
0
2008 Sprayers
D Agnwhurat Equipment
1900
ew
0.01
001
458E-0I
O.00E0)
544E -W
4.57E-04
0
2000 Sprayer
D Agmultund Equipment
1987
0.02
0
ON
3.07E-04
O.wE00
709E-08
388E-04
0
2000 Sprayers
D Agriculuml Equipment
1986
002
0
ON
3.42E-04
O.00E00
6.30E-0e
3.43E -W
0
2000 Sprayers
D Agnculural Equipment
1985
OR
0
0.03
302E-04
OAOE -w
5.59E -08
3.03E-1
0
2008 Spree,
D Agriwhmal Equipment
1901
0.01
0
002
260E-04
O.00Ew
5.11E W
2.59E-04
0
2008 Sprayers
D Agrcultural Equipment
1803
0.01
0
002
208E-04
O.00E400
4.14E -W
209E-01
0
2005 Sprayers
D Agnwltu.1 Equipment
1902
0.01
0
0.02
1.18E -01
O.wE-00
3.36E-08
1.89E-0t
0
2we Spryer,
D Agnwlunl Equipment
1981
0.01
0
0.01
1.24E-0t
0.00600
248E -08
124E-0l
0
Agricultural Emissions (Los Gatos as a Percent of the County of Santa Clara's Agricultural Land) -Off road Year 2008.
Popula0p
Activity
Consumptio
CY Equipment
Fuel CLASS
MY
n
(hourefday)
n
CO2Eahoust 1,120EaM1aust Cn4Eahaust
CO2e
CO2e
2036 Sprayers
0 Agncutlumi Equipment
1980
0.01
0
001
9.91E -05
000E-00
199E-08
991
0
2008 Sprayers
0 Agncueuml Equipment
1979
0
0
0.01
6.94E415
000E-00
I 49 08
691
0
2W8 sprayers
D Agncueuml Equipment
1978
0
0
0
372E -05
0.00E -00
8 OIE -09
373E -05
0
2W8 Sprayers
D Agncueurl Equipment
1977
0
0
0
124E -05
0.00E +W
268E -09
1.24E 45
O
2W8 Sprayers
❑ Agncultural Equipment
2WB
002
0.01
004
4.%E 04
0.00E +W
8WE -09
d %E4
0
2W6 Sprayers
D Agncueurl Equipment
2W7
0.02
001
004
444E -04
OWE +W
887E-09
4.45E-01
0
2W8 Sprayers
0 Agncultural Equipment
2000
002
0
004
4.22E -W
OWE -00
860E -09
4.22E-0I
0
MOB Sprayers
D Agncuemal Equipment
2005
002
0
004
457E -W
0 .WE+00
848E -09
408E-04
0
2008 Sprayers
D Agreueural Equipment
2004
002
0
001
402E -04
O.WE -W
IWE�00
4WE -04
0
2008 Sprayers
D Agrkultural Equipment
3003
002
0
004
401E -04
O.WE +W
IO2E 08
401E-04
0
2008 Sprayers
❑ Agricultural Equipment
2002
0.02
0
004
3.91E -04
O.WE+W
1.15E -08
391E-01
0
2006 Smayers
D Agncueuml Equipment
2WI
0.02
0
003
3.130E-04
O.WE +W
14BE -08
380E-01
0
2W6 Sprayers
D Agncueuml Equipment
2000
002
0
0.03
374E4
0WEW
2.35E 08
374E-01
0
2008 Sprayers
D Agncueuml Equipment
1999
002
0
003
369E-0I
0WE+W
2.33E -08
370E-04
0
2008 Sprayers
D Agncueuml Equipment
1998
002
0
003
361E-04
OWE+W
2.20E -00
361E-04
0
2008 Sprayers
D Agricueurat Equipment
1997
003
0.01
005
564E -04
O.WE -W
358E -08
555E-04
O
2W8 Sprayers
❑ Agncuhural Equipment
19%
003
0.01
000
662E-04
O.WE +W
421E -08
6.82E-04
O
2W0 Sprayers
D Agncueuml Equipment
1995
002
0
004
3 W 04
0WE-W
528E -00
3.91E-04
0
208 Sprayers
D Agncueuml Equipment
1993
001
0
0.02
172E -M
OWE +W
2.35E -C8
1.73E-04
0
2W6 Sprayers
D Agncueuml Equipment
1992
001
0
0.02
200E -a
0WE+00
342E -08
251E-04
0
2000 Sprayers
D AWcuM1Ural Equipment
1991
001
0
001
144E 04
O.WE+W
1.96E -08
145E-04
0
2008 Spurr
❑ Agncuitund Equipment
19W
0
0
001
104E -04
0WEW
144E -08
105E-04
0
2W6 Sprayers
D Agncueuml Equipment
1989
0
0
001
932E -05
OWE +00
129E -08
9.35E -05
0
2006 Sprayers
D Agncueuml Equipment
1988
0
0
0.01
849E -05
000E+W
1.10E.08
8.52E -05
0
2W6 Sprayers
D Agncueuml Equipment
1987
0
0
0.01
720E 4i5
OWE-00
123E 08
7.23E -05
0
2W8 Sprayers
D Agncueuml Equipment
1986
0
0
0.01
637E05
o.WE+W
1.10E 08
6.39E -05
0
2W8 Sprayers
D Agncueuml Equipment
1985
0
0
0.01
560E05
000E+00
9 71 E 09
5.85E -05
0
2W8 Sprayera
D Agricultural Equipment
1984
0
0
0
410E 05
0 WE+00
8 W -09
4.82E -05
0
2W8 Sprayers
D Agmiueural Equipment
1983
0
0
0
3.88E 05
0 WE +00
721 E09
3.09E -05
0
2W6 Simi
0 Ag..Kural Equipment
1982
0
0
0
3.14E -05
000E-W
565E 09
3.15E -05
0
2000 S.,.
D Agncueuml Equipment
1981
0
0
0
231E -05
OWE+W
431E 09
2.32E -05
0
2W6 Sprayers
D Agrcueuml Equipment
1980
0
0
0
185E -05
OWE+W
3.46E 09
185E -05
0
2008 Sprayers
❑ Agricultural Equipment
1979
0
0
0
1.29E 05
OWE +W
257E -09
1.30E -05
0
2008 Spayed
D Agricultural Equipment
1978
0
0
0
692EW
0WE +00
138E 09
6.95E-06
0
2008 Spmi
D Agricultural Equipment
1977
0
0
0
2.31EW
00E-00
461E 10
2.32E-06
0
2000 Titters
0 Agricultural Equipment
2008
001
001
0
3.38E 05
000E -00
3.16E 09
3.38E -05
0
2W0 Tillers
0 Agncueurl Equipment
2W7
0,01
001
0
3.16E05
OWE +W
295E 09
3.10E -05
0
2008 Tilers
D Agricultural Equipment
2006
0.01
0.01
0
280E 05
OWE+W
262E -09
280E -05
0
2008 Tillers
D Amicultuml Equipment
2005
0.01
001
0
234E 05
0WE +00
256ED9
2.74E 05
0
2W8 Tigers
D Agricultural Equipment
2004
0.01
001
0
2.71E -05
000E -00
353E 09
232E -05
0
2W6 Tillers
D Agricultuml Equipment
2W3
0.01
001
0
2WE45
000E -W
330E 09
2.61E -05
0
2W8 Tillers
D Agncueuml Equipment
2002
0
0
0
102E -05
OWE +W
1.32E09
1.02E -05
0
2008 Titers
D Agncueuml Equipment
2m1
0
0
0
646E-06
0WEW
8.39E -10
618E-06
0
2008 Tekrs
O Agricultural Equipment
2000
0
0
0
3.73E-06
0 .WE +00
485E -10
334E -W
D
2008 Tekrs
❑ Agricultural Equipment
1999
0
0
0
271E-06
000E+W
543E -10
232E-06
0
2W6 Tilka
0 Agncultpral Equipment
1998
0
O
0
153E -W
000E-W
3.07E -10
1.54E-06
0
2008 Tillers
D Agncueurl Equipment
1997
0
0
0
552E -07
0WE+W
1.11E -10
554E47
0
2008 Tillers
D Agricultural Equipment
2,008
0
0
0
4.10E -05
O.WE +W
8.16E -10
4IOE-05
0
2008 Tigers
D Agncultural Equipment
2W7
0
0
0
319E 05
O.WE -W
828E -10
3.99E-05
0
2W8 TJlers
D Agllcultural Equipment
Met
0
O
0
339E -05
0.00E +00
958E -10
339E -05
0
208 Tirme
D Agncueuml Equipment
2W5
0
0
0
3.66E-05
0.00E+W
954E -10
366E -05
0
2W8 Titers
D Agncuemal Equipment
2W4
0
0
0
361E -05
0WE+W
1.10E -09
361E-05
0
MOB Tillers
D Agricultural Equipment
2003
0
0
0
360E -05
OWE-W
145E 09
3.60E-05
0
2008 Tllkrs
O Agncueuml Equipment
2W2
0
0
0
0.51E.05
DWE+W
227E -09
352E -05
0
2008 TIkrS
0 Agricultural Equipment
2001
0
0
0
341E -05
OWE+W
222E -09
3.42E 4)5
O
2008 Tiers
0 Agncueurl Equipment
2000
0
0
0
3.36E -05
0 .WE +00
220E 09
336E -05
O
2008 Tillers
0 Agncueurl Equipment
1999
0
0
0
3.32E 05
0.00E+00
2.19E 09
3.32E -05
O
208 Tilers
D Agncueuml Equipment
1998
D
0
0
3.24E -05
0WE -W
2.15E -09
3.24E 4t5
0
2W6 Tilers
D Agreueumi Equipment
1997
0
0
0
507E -05
O.WE -W
3.39E -09
508E -05
0
2WB T91ere
D Agreutural Equipment
19%
0
0
001
5.94E 05
O.WE+W
4.01E -09
595E -05
0
2WB Titters
D Agricultural Equipment
1995
0
0
0
3.50E 05
O.WE+W
505E -09
351E -05
0
2008 Tien;
D Agncultural Equipment
1993
0
0
0
1.55E 05
OWE+W
226E09
155E-05
0
2W0 Tillem
D Agreultural Equipment
1992
0
0
0
2.25E -05
000E +00
331 E09
2.25E-05
0
20B Tllkrs
D Agncueuml Equipment
1991
0
0
0
130E -05
OWE+W
192E09
130E-05
0
2008 Tilers
D Agncueuml Equipment
19m
0
0
0
938E-06
OWE+W
1.40E 09
9.41E-08
0
208 TAkrs
D Agncueuml Equipment
1909
0
0
0
830E W
OWE+W
1.26E 09
8.40E.W
0
2000 TAkrs
D Agricultural Equipment
1908
0
0
0
763E A6
OWE+00
1.16E -09
7.85E-06
0
208 Tilers
❑ Agricultural Equipment
1907
0
0
0
647E05
OWE+W
138E -09
650E-06
0
208 Tillers
D Agncueurl Equipment
less
0
0
0
572E W
0 WE-W
114E09
535E W
0
208 Were
D Agncueuml Equipment
1905
0
0
0
5.00E-06
OWE+W
IOIE09
5.00E -W
0
2008 Tlllem
D Agncueuml Equipment
1984
0
0
0
431E16
0WE-W
9.28E 10
4.33E -W
0
200 Tillers
D Agncueuml Equipment
1983
0
0
0
348E4
000E+W
7.55E 10
350E-08
0
2000 Were
D Agncueurl Equipment
1982
0
0
0
2.82EW
001
6.15E -10
281E W
0
2008 Tillers
D Agricultural Equipment
1981
0
0
0
207E W
0.WE +W
455E -10
2.08E-06
0
200 Tllkrs
0 Agncutimel Equipment
1900
0
0
0
166EW
OWE+W
366E -10
1.67E-06
0
2000 Tillers
0 Agricultural Equipment
1979
0
0
0
1.16E -06
000E+W
275E -10
1.17E-06
0
2W0 Tilers
D Agncueurl Equipment
1978
0
0
0
622E -07
0WE+W
148E -10
6.25E 47
0
2000 Tilers
D Agncueuml Equipment
1977
0
0
0
207E -07
0WE+W
4.97E -11
200E -07
0
200 Tilers
O Agricultural Equipment
2W8
0
0
002
219E-04
O.WE +W
437E -09
2.19E-04
0
2W0 Tillers
O Agncueuml Equipment
2W7
0
0
002
2.14E .W
O.WE -W
443E -09
2.14E-04
0
2W0 Tillers
D Agncueurl Equipment
2000
0
0
002
2.03E 04
O.WE +W
437E -09
2.03E -04
0
2W0 Tillers
D Agncultu it Equipment
2W5
0
0
0.02
1.96E -04
000E +W
438E -09
1.96E-04
0
2000 TiAea
D Agncuemal Equipment
2006
0
0
0.02
1.93E_04
0WE -00
5.10E -09
1.93E -04
O
2W8 Tieers
D Agricullural Equipment
2003
0
0
0.02
193E-0C
0 .WE+00
531E 09
1.93E-04
0
2W8 Tltem
D Agncueuml Equipment
2W2
0
0
002
188E-04
O.WE +W
59BE09
188E-04
0
2W8 Tillers
0 Agncueuml Equipment
2W1
0
0
002
1.83E-04
O.WE -W
7.56E 09
18.1E-04
0
2006 Tillers
0 Agncueurl Equipment
2000
0
0
002
1.80E-0d
OWE +W
116E -08
1.WE-04
0
2000 Tillers
D Agncueuml Equipment
1999
0
0
002
1,77E4
OWE +W
1.15E -C8
1 .78Ei
0
2W8 Tillers
D Agncummil Equipment
1998
0
0
002
t 73 -0C
OWE+W
1.13E -08
134E-01
0
2006 Tillers
D Agncuemal Equipment
1997
0
0
002
271E 04
0 WEW
VBE -O8
232E-04
0
Agricultural Emissions (Los Gatos as a Percent of the County of Santa Clara's Agricultural Land) - Offroad Year 2808.
cY
Pepubtin Aetwity consurni
n (hoursrWy) n CO2 Exhaust NW Exhaust OH4 Exhaust OO2e CO2e
2008 Tillers
D Agricultural Equipment
19%
0
0
003
3.18E-04
0.00E+0D
2.IDE 48
3.1 %-04
2008 Tillers
0 Agricultural Equipment
1985
0
0
0.02
107E-4N
0.00E+00
264E -00
1.88E-04
2000 Times
D AgncuXuml Equipment
1993
0
0
OOt
827E-05
0.00E -0
1.18E -08
8.00E -05
2000 Tlbrc
D AgnwXUml Equipment
1892
0
0
001
120E-04
0.0E0
1.72E -08
1.21E-04
2008 Tillers
D Agricueral Equipment
1991
0
0
0.01
6.93E -05
0.0060
9.91
6.95EA
208 Time,
D Agricultural Equipment
1990
0
0
0
5.02E-05
0.00E00
726E -09
51
20 Tilers
08
D Agricultural Equipment
1989
0
0
0
4.48E-05
0.00E-0p
6.52E -N
4.501
2008 Tilers
D Agncueml Equipment
1980
0
0
0
4.08E-05
0.00600
5.WE-0
440E -05
2008 Tilers
D AgnkNuml Equipment
1987
0
0
0
346E -05
0.00E00
8.29EN
3.47E 45
2008 Tillers
D AyrkuXural Equipment
19%
0
0
0
3.06E -05
01
5.591
307E-05
200 Tiers
D Agricultural Equipment
1985
0
0
0
2.71E 45
0.WE00
4.97E-09
2.72E -05
208 Tillers
D Agricultural Equipment
1904
0
0
0
231E-05
OOOE00
4.56E -09
232E -05
2008 Tillers
D Agricultural Equipment
1983
0
0
0
1.Bil
0.00E+00
3.70E-09
1.87E-05
2008 Unit,
D Agmeultuml Equipment
1982
0
0
0
1.51E-05
0.0060
3.01E-09
1.52E-05
2008 Tilers
D Agricultural Equipment
1981
0
0
0
1.11E-05
0.0060
223E -09
1.11E -05
2008 Tillers
D Agricultural Equipment
Ism
0
0
0
8.88E-08
0.00EW
1.79E -W
8.91E-08
2000 Tillers
D Agricultural Equipment
1979
0
0
0
6.21E-08
0.(i
1.00E-09
6.24E-06
2000 Tilers
D Agricultural Equpmem
1970
0
0
0
3.33E -%
0.00E-00
Tl1 10
334E -W
Tilers
Agricultural
D Agricultural Equipment
1977
0
0
0
1.11E-0fi
0.00E-00
240E -10
1.11E -W
2008 emptiers
D Agricultural Equipment
2008
5.52
1.67
4.07
4.48E-02
OApE00
8.79E -07
4.40E-02
2008 SuaNtts
D Agresti Equipment
ZOO]
5.30
1.62
397
4.38E-02
00EM0
1.63E-06
4.37E-02
2008 Simmons
D Apriuruml Equipment
2mA
5.1
1.54
3.77
4.14E-02
&(i
157E-06
4.14E-02
2000 SxMers
D Agricultural Equipment
2W5
4.93
149
3.64
4.00E-02
0.00E-W
224E-08
4.00E-02
2000 Somers
D Agricultural Equipment
2004
4.87
147
3.6
3.95E412
0.00E00
3.61E -%
3.911E-02
200 Seaters
D Agricultural Equipment
2W3
4.05
1.46
3.61
3.9.7E-02
U.00EW
7.117E-0
3.95E -02
200 simmers
D AgneXmal Equipment
2002
4.73
1.43
3.52
3.84E-02
O.WE
7.52E -%
3.85E -02
208 SWmhms
D Agneeral Equipment
2001
4.6
1.39
142
3.T3E -02
0.0E-0D
7.34E -%
3.75E 42
2008 Summers
D Agricueral Equipment
200
4.53
1.37
337
3.67E-4p
0.00E -00
728E -%
3.69l
2008 Seamers
D Agricultural Equipment
1998
447
1.35
133
3.63E-4p
0.00E0
7SIE -W
3.64E -02
2000 Sinters
D Agreultur'el Equipment
1898
4.37
1.32
325
3.54E-02
0.00E0
7.07E-06
3.56E -02
200 Seeem
D AgncuXural Equipment
1997
6.0
2.W
5.0
5.54E -02
O.00EeW
1.11E-05
5.56E-02
200 Seaeem
D Ageultuml Equipment
1996
8.01
2.42
5.%
6.WE-02
0.110E+0
1.31E-05
6.52E 42
2008 Sea @ens
D Agricultural Equipment
1995
4.72
142
351
3.83E-02
0.0E00
7.73E -W
3.84E-02
2008 Summers
D Agricultural Equipment
1 %3
20
0.83
155
159E-4p
0.00E00
1411E -%
1]% -02
2008 Sualhers
D Agncumuml Equipment
1992
30
0.91
226
248E-02
(i
5 %E -%
2.47E-02
2000 Simmers
D Apriculluml Equipment
1991
1,75
0.53
1.J
1.42E-02
OWE -W
2.82E -W
142E-02
21100 Simmers
D Agricultural Equipment
190
126
0.38
094
1.00E -02
O.WEO
2.13E -W
1.0E-0Z
21100 Saalmers
D Agricultural Equipment
19,119
1.13
0.34
ON
9.111E -03,
0.'1
1.91E -05
920E-03
208 Sealers
D Agricultural Equipment
1988
1.03
0.31
077
8.34E -0
000600
1.75E -06
838E 03
208 Securers
D Agricultural Equipment
1987
0.87
0.26
0.65
7.07E -03
0.0E-0
2.16E -W
7.12E W
2008 Suallers
D Alinement] Equipment
19%
0.77
01
058
625E -03
U.00E00
1.92E -W
Isi
2008 Summers
D Agreumeral Equipment
1 %5
0.88
021
051
Si
0.00E00
1.71E -%
557E -03
2008 Semhers
D Amncumual Equipment
1904
0.88
0.18
044
AIIIE43
O.WEM
1.46E-06
4.74E -03
2000 Seaters
D Ageultuml Equipment
1983
0.47
0.14
0.35
3.81E-03
O.WE00
1.191
3.81
2000 Sealers
D Agricultural Equipment
t %2
0.38
0.11
on
3.0 %-03
0.1101
9.00E-0]
3.10E 4)3
200 Sealers
D Agnicumuml Equipment
1981
028
0.0
0.21
227E-03
0.00E -W
7.12E -07
2.28E -03
2008 Summers
D Agircueml Equipment
19N
0.22
0.07
0.17
1.81E -03
0.01311E-00
5.72E -07
182E 03
208 Summers
D Ageueml Equipment
1979
0.16
ON
0.12
127E -03
Di
4.02E -07
128E-03
2008 Sealhers
D Ageultural Equipment
1970
0.0
0.0
0.%
6.80E+04
0.00EW
2.18E -07
664E8
2008 Srmhers
D ApNUltuml Equipment
19T]
0.03
0.01
0.0
2.27E-04
0.00EW
725E-08
2.28E-00
2000 Sealeers
D Agricultural Equipment
2008
0.05
0.01
0.07
7.69E-04
O.WEW
1.51E -08
270E-04
2000 Semhers
D Agricultural Equipment
2000
0.05
0.01
057
7.00E-04
O.WEa00
1.51E-08
TWE-00
2008 Sealers
D Agrkullmal Equipment
20011
0.0
0.01
0.06
7.11E-04
O.WE00
2.29E-08
7.12E -N
2008 b srthttf
D Atimelum] Equipment
2W5
004
0.01
1
687E-4N
00E-W
225E-08
688E-04
AN Sommers
D Agricumuml Equipment
2004
0114
0.01
000
6.78E-4N
0.00E-W
31
67N<m
2008 Summers
D Agricultural Equipment
2WJ
0.0
0.01
0.0
6.78E-04
0.00E-00
4.50E -08
677E-04
208 Summers
D Agresti Equipment
202
004
0.01
0.06
6.59E-04
O.00EW
887E-08
661E-04
2008 Seems.
D AgNulluml Equipment
2001
0.04
0.01
0.06
6.41E-04
O.WE,w
8.1111E -08
643-04
2000 Sealers
D Anicueral Equipment
2000
01
0.01
0.%
831E -W
0.0E-00
8.57E-0
8.33E-04
2000 Sealers
D Agrkumuml Equipment
1999
004
0.01
000
823E -04
O.WE-OD
800E -0
8.25E-04
2008 SWhers
D Alikumural Equpmem
19%
004
0.01
0%
8.08E-0I
O.WE00
B.34E-OB
6.10E-04
2008 simmers
D Agricultural Equipment
199]
0.06
01
ON
9.57E-04
OOpEOp
1.31E -07
9.54E-04
2008 Seethds
D Agricultural Equipment
19%
0.07
0.02
0.1
1.12E-03
0.O0E-W
1.55E -07
1.12E -03
21100 Sealers
D Agricultural Equipment
IN5
0.04
0.01
0%
6.57E-04
0.0EW
9.15E-00
6.59E-04
208 Sealers
D Agricultural Equipment
1983
0.0
0.01
003
2.90E-0I
0.0E-00
4.08E -0
.291E-04
208 Simmers
D Agnweml Equipment
1982
0.0
0.01
0.%
422E-04
0A%-0
5.95E -0
4.23E-04
=Hl Stealers
D Agricultural Equipment
1981
0.02
0
0.02
243E-0I
0.0E00
3.15E -W
244E-04
2008 Summers
D Agricultural Equipment
1900
001
0
002
1.76E-04
01
2.51E -Olt
177E-04
2008 Summers
D Ageueral Equipment
1989
0.01
0
0.01
1.57E-04
0.00E0
226E -0
1.00E-04
2008 Summers
D AgrbuXUml Equipment
1988
0.01
0
0.01
1.43E-04
0.(0E -00
2.06E -0
144EL
2000 Summers
D Agricultural Equipment
1987
0.01
0
0.01
121E-04
0.00EW
2.27E.N
122E-04
2008 Semhen
D Agricultural Equipment
19%
0.01
0
001
1.07E-04
0.'1
2.02E -08
1.WE-04
2000 Semmes,
D Agreement) Equipment
1W5
0.01
0
001
9.WE-05
0.1
1.79E-0
9.54E -05
2008 Sommers
D Agricumuml Equipment
1904
0.01
0
001
8.10E -05
Op0E00
1.64E-08
8.13E -05
NO Szmmms
D Ageumuml Equipmenl
1903
0
0
001
651E 45
0i
1.33E -0
0.57E -05
2008 Seaters
D AgncuXural Equipment
1982
0
0
0
519E -05
0.00EM
1.08E -W
5.32E -05
2008 Steamers
D AgrbuXUml Equipment
1981
0
0
0
3.98E-05
0.00EW
7.88E -N
191E -0
2000 Summers
D Agreement Equipment
Ism
0
0
0
3.11E-05
0.0060
642E-00
3.13E-05
2000 Simmers
D AgneXural Equipment
1979
0
0
0
218E -05
0.00E-00
4.110E -09
2.19E -05
2000 Summers
D Agieueml Equpmem
1978
0
0
0
1.17E-05
O.WE -W
2.58E-09
1.17E 45
ADS seems.
D Agmtumural Equipment
1977
0
0
0
388E-06
O.(i
8.64E -10
391E%
208 Him POxerUNZ
D Agnculluml Equipment
200
022
048
0.13
1.44E-03
0.0Es00
1.52E -07
1.45E -03
208 Hymm Pewer. UNs
D Agreulluml Equipment
207
02
0.98
0.12
1.33E-03
000E-00
1.90E -0]
133E -03
ZOOS Hytlm peeler UMs
D Agrkumuml Equipmem
200
0.17
0.39
0.11
1.17E-03
01
122E -07
1.17E -03
208 Hitler Peeler UNS
D Agricultural Equipment
2005
0.16
0.11
0.03
3.36E-04
O.WEW
3.53E-08
3.37E-04
2008 Hytlm Peeer U3ms
D Apicumuml Equipment
2004
0.0
0.015
002
1.67E-04
0.110EW
2.17E -Olt
1.67E-04
2000 Hy&O Peett UNS
D AgneXuml Equipment
2003
001
0.02
0
4.55E -05
0.00-00
5.91E-09
4.Ni
2000 Hytlm seems Units
D Agriemura] Equipment
2000
034
0.78
04
4.36E-03
0.00E-0
4.75E -07
4.37E 03
200 Hydra peeler Unms
D Agricultural Equipment
2007
0.32
0.71
0.37
4.08E-03
0.00E-00
4.44E-0]
LOSE 03
2008 Hydm POWm Units
D Agricultural Equipment
2006
028
0.00
0.33
3.62E-03
O.WEM
384E 47
382E -03
Agricultural Emissions (Los Gatos as a Percent of the County of Santa Clara's Agricultural Land) - Offroad Year 2008
CY Equipment
Fuel CMSs
MY
Populstlo
n
Auylty
IhurLdayl
Consurni
n
CO2Ea0aust N20Exluusl CH4Exhaust
Wile
CO2e
2009 Hydro Power WAS
D AgMulual Equipment
2005
028
0.02
0.32
3.51E-03
0.00E-00
3.85E -07
3.55E-03
1
2108 Hydro paver Uras
O Agrealuml Equipment
2004
027
0.81
032
3.51E-03
000E-00
429E -07
3.52E -03
1
2000 "m PantUnis
D Agnultunl Equipment
2003
026
0.59
0.31
3.30E -03
000E+00
4.11E -07
3.37E -0J
1
2000 hydra Pawm Unis
D Agnoultural Equipment
2002
DA
023
0.12
1.32E 4)3
0.00E00
1.61E 07
1.32E-03
0
2000 Hydro Parer U.N.
D Agricultural Equipment
2001
0.00
0.15
ON
8.35E-04
0.00E -00
1.02E 07
8.37E-0e
0
2108 Rom Feiner Units
D Agricultural Equipment
2000
0.04
0.08
0.04
4.83E-04
000E00
5.90E 08
481E-04
0
2008 Hydro Paver Units
D Agncultuml Equipment
1999
0.N
0.06
003
350E -04
0.00E -w
1.23E -07
3.52E-0t
0
2000 Hydro Paver Units
D Agncununl Equipment
1998
0.02
0.03
0.02
198E -04
0.00E-00
695E -Olt
1.99E-04
0
2008 Hydro Power Unis
D AgnwOunl Equipment
1997
0.01
0.01
0.01
7A 3E.05
000E-0O
2.51E -08
7.18E-05
0
2000 H1ydro Power Unis
0 Agncuttunl Equipment
2108
0A4
0.31
on
3.24E -03
0.00E -00
8.15E -08
3.24E-03
1
2008 "Am Potent Units
D AgrktAural Equipment
2007
0.14
0.3
0.29
3.16E -03
0.00E+00
1.97E -07
3.16E -03
1
2008 Hydro Pant Urms
D AgRMural Equipment
2000
0.13
028
0.27
3.00E -03
0.00E -00
2.11E 47
3.00E -03
1
2000 Hydro Paver Units
D Agneui Equipment
2005
0.13
0.28
017
2.90E -03
000E-00
3.25E-07
290E-03
1
2000 Hydra Pwrnt Units
D Agnwltunl Equipment
2004
0.13
0.27
016
2811
000E-0p
5.81E -07
2.07E-03
1
2000 Hydro Fauber Units
D Agricultural Equipment
2003
0.12
0.27
027
2.85E 43
0.00E+00
1.27E -06
2.88E-03
1
2008 Hydra Fauber WAS
D Agncultmal Equipment
2002
0.12
0.26
026
2.78E42
0.00E+00
1.31EM
2.81E-0J
1
2000 Hydra Fewer Units
D Agncultmal Equipment
2001
0.12
026
0.25
2 .70E -03
0.00E-00
1.35E 06
2.73E-03
1
2000 Hydra Power Unis
D Agnomural Equipment
2000
0.12
025
025
208E -03
0.00E-00
140E-06
208Em
1
2008 Hydro power Units
0 Agnmmuml Equipment
1999
0.12
015
025
283E -0]
OBOE -00
1.46EA6
266E-03
1
20DB Hydro Power Units
D Agnwltunl Equipment
1998
0.11
0.24
024
256E -03
0.00E -00
1.06E -00
2.50E-03
1
2008 Hydro Paver Unes
D Agncultunl Equipment
1900
0.18
0.30
038
481E -03
0.00E-00
3.05E -M
4.08E-03
I
2008 Hydro Power Units
D Agricultural Equipment
1996
011
01
045
4.70E-03
0.00E -00
3.74E-06
4 .78E -03
2
2008 Hydro Parer Units
D AgnautuM Equipment
1995
0.12
028
017
2AE-03
000600
2.30E-06
282E-03
1
2008 Hydm Paver UMs
D AgncuXUnl Equipment
1993
01
0.12
0.12
122E-03
000E -w
1.07E -00
125E 43
0
2008 Hydra Paver UMS
D Agricultural Equipment
1992
008
0.17
017
178E-03
000E+00
155E-06
1B1EU3
1
2008 Hydro Paver Unis
D Agricultural Equipment
1991
0.04
0.1
(1
102E -03
000E-00
6931
1.04E-03
0
2000 Hydro parer Unis
D Agricultural Equipment
1990
0.00
0.07
007
7.43E -04
0.00E-00
647E -07
7.56E-04
0
2000 Hydra Pouber U.N.
D Agnulurm Equipment
1989
Om
0.00
005
6.63E-01
0.00E -00
5.77E 07
6.75E-04
0
2000 Hydra Power Units
D Agricultural Equipment
1988
0.00
0.05
am
6.04E -01
0.00E-00
5ZBE 07
6.15E-04
0
2000 Hydra Paver UMS
D Agricultural Equipment
1907
002
DM
005
5.12E-04
0.00E-00
4.58E -07
522E-01
0
2000 Hydro Paver Units
0 Agnealund Equipment
1906
0.02
0.04
004
4.53E-00
0.00E-00
4.03E -07
461E-04
0
2000 Hydro Parer Unes
D AgncMUral Equipment
1905
0.02
0.04
001
400E-04
0.00E+00
3.58E -07
4.00E-04
0
2009 Hydra Paver Units
D Agricultural Equipment
1904
0.01
0.03
0.03
3AtE-04
0.01E -00
384E -07
3.48E-04
0
2pe6 Hydro Paver Units
0 Agricultural Equipment
1983
0.01
003
003
276E-09
0.00E+00
2.45E -07
2.81E-14
0
2008 Hydro Power Units
D Agncultuml Equipment
1982
OBI
0.02
002
223E-01
0.09E-00
1.99E -07
2.27E-04
0
2008 HAmParerUMs
D Agibultural Equipment
1981
0.01
002
002
164E -04
000E+0D
116E -07
187E-01
0
2AKMI Mo. Paver MIA
D Agncultural Equipment
Her,
01
0.01
001
1.31E -04
000600
117E -07
1.34E-04
0
2008 Hydro Paver Units
D Agricultural Equipment
1979
0
0.01
0.01
9.191
0.00@00
848E -08
9.36E-05
0
2008 Hydro Paver Units
D Agricultural Equipment
1978
0
0
0
4.92E -M
0.00E+00
4.38E 08
501E -05
0
2000 Hydro Power WAS
D Agricultural Equipment
1977
0
0
0
1.64E -05
0.00E+0D
1.46E -00
1.67E-05
0
2000 Hydro Power Units
D Agywu6uml Equipment
2008
001
0.03
005
598E-04
0.00E-00
1.38E-08
698E-04
0
2000 Hydro Paver WAS
D Agnw6ural Equipment
2007
0.01
0.03
005
500E-01
0.00E-00
258E-00
581E-04
0
2000 Hydra Paver WAS
D AgncultuM Equipment
2006
0.01
0.03
0.05
551E-0t
0.00100
2.67E -08
5.51E-04
0
2008 Hydm POVer Unis
D Agricultural Equipment
2005
0.01
0.03
0.05
5.32E-04
0.00E-00
3.78E -Olt
5.30E-04
0
2000 Kom Power Units
D Agdcuhuml Equipment
2004
0.01
002
005
525E-04
000E+00
5.93E-08
528E-04
0
2008 Hydro Power Units
D AgricMeml Equipment
2003
0.01
0.02
005
523E-01
000E-00
121E -07
526E-04
0
2000 Hydro power Units
D Agricultural Equipment
2102
0.01
0.02
0.05
5.11E-01
000E-00
121E -07
5.13E-04
0
2000 Hydra Power Unis
D Agricultural Equipment
2001
0.01
0.02
005
4.96E-04
OBOE -00
1.21E 07
4.99E-04
0
2008 H7dm POteerUMS
D AgMMUral Equipment
2000
01
0.02
ON
4.80E -M
0.00E-00
1.9E -07
4.91E-04
0
2006 Hydro PaveNnAS
D Agricultural Equipment
1999
0.01
0.01
0.00
482E-04
000E-00
1.24E-07
485E-0I
0
2008 Hydro NwerUMs
D Agricultural Equipment
M996
ai
002
004
471E -00
0.00E -00
1.25E -07
474E-01
0
2008 Hydro Power WAS
D Agdwltural Equpmem
1997
0.02
0.04
007
7.37E -00
0.00E00
2001
141E-04
0
2008 Hydro Power Units
D Agrkultunl Equipment
19%
0.02
OBI
008
8.61E-04
0.00100
211E -07
689E-01
0
2008 Hydro Paver UMS
D Agriculund Equipment
1995
0.01
0.02
005
5.09E-04
0.00E+00
1.45E -07
5.12E-01
0
2008 Hydro Pi WAS
D AgriculuM Equipment
1993
0
001
002
225E-04
OBOE -00
6.61E -08
226E-04
0
200B Hydro Poubnt WAS
D Agncu11um1 Equtpmenl
1992
001
082
003
3.9E-04
0.00E+00
9.61E -08
3.29E-04
0
2008 Hydro Pavnt Unis
D AgdcuOurel Equipment
1991
0
0101
002
1.88E -04
0.00E -w
653E -08
1.89E-04
0
2008 Hydro Power Unis
0 Agricultural Equipment
1990
0
0.01
001
136E-01
0.00E -00
4.01E-08
1.37E-04
0
2008 Hydro Power Unis
D Amultund Equipment
1909
0
0.01
0.01
1.22E -04
0.00E-00
3.58E.08
1.23E-04
0
2008 Hydra Fever Unis
D AgrkuBUral Equipment
1908
0
0.01
0.01
1.11E -04
0.00E-00
3.26E -0B
1.12E-0t
0
2008 HAmPaver Unis
D AgMultuml Equipment
1987
0
0
0.01
9.40E -05
0.00E+00
4.02E -Olt
9.49E-05
0
2000 Hydra Power Units
0 Agnwltuml Equipment
19%
0
0
001
8.32E -05
D.00E+00
3.56E -0
8.39E-05.
0
2008 Hydra Paver Units
D Agncultural Equipment
1985
0
0
001
7.35E -05
000E00
314E -08
7.42E-05
D
2000 Hydro Power Units
D Agnculunl Equipment
1984
0
0
001
6.1
0.00100
288E -08
6]]E- -05
0
2000 Hydro Power Units
D Agricultural Equipment
1983
0
0
0
5 .461
0.00E-00
2.17E -00
5.11E 45
0
2000 Hydro paver Units
D Agncultmal Equpmem
1982
0
0
0
4.10E 4N5
0.00100
1.75E -08
4.14E-05
0
20110 Hydra Power Units
D Agricultural Equipment
1981
0
0
0
3.01
0.00100
1.29E -08
300E-05
0
2000 Hydra Power U.K.
D Agnwltunl Equipment
1980
0
0
0
2AIE -05
0.00E +00
1.03E-08
243E 4X5
0
2008 Hydm Primer U.N.
D Agrkulmal Equipment
1979
0
0
0
1.69E415
0.00E -w
19E -09
1 .70E -05
0
2000 Hydra Power Units
D AgrkMunl Equipment
1978
0
0
0
9.04E -00
0.00E +00
387E-09
9.12E -Olt
0
2008 Hydra Paver Units
0 Ag.ftend Equipment
1977
0
0
0
3.01E-0d
UBOE00
1.29E-09
3.00E-00
0
2008 Ober AgncMUral Equipment
D Agrkulunl Equipment
2000
0.47
0.57
0.2
2.18E-0M1
0.00E-00
2.29E -07
2.19E -03
1
2008 Omer AgreuRAMI Equipment
D Agrlculuml Equipment
2007
0.47
0.57
02
2.19E-03
0.00E+00
2.31E -07
220E-03
I
2008 Omer Agricultural Equipment
D Agrkuluml Equipment
2008
0.45
0.55
0.19
2.12E 43
0.00E+00
223E -07
2.13E-03
1
2008 Olney Agricultural Equipment
D Agrkutunl Equipment
2005
0.41
015
017
191
0.00E-00
201E -07
1.91E-03
I
2006 Ober AgMutuml Equipment
0 Agricultural Equipment
2004
D.34
0.41
0.14
158E-03
U.00E0D
208E-07
1.59E-03
1
2008 Omer AgMukand Equipment
D Agraultunl Equipment
2003
0.12
0.15
005
5.57E-04
000600
7.23E -011
5.58E-04
0
200B Other Agni Equipment
D Agnculeal Equipment
20112
0.1
0.12
ON
4.49E-01
0.00E+00
583E -08
4.50E-01
0
208 Omer AgnculuMEquipment
D Agricultural Equipment
200 1
0.08
0.07
003
2.81
0.00E -00
3.66EM
2.83E-04
0
2008 Other Agnculural Equipment
D Agricultural Equipment
2000
am
004
001
LQE-04
0.00E+00
1.85E -Olt
1.4]E-04
0
2008 0Mr Agnculmal Equipment
D Agricultural Equipment
1999
0.01
001
0
327E-05
0.00E00
9.37E -09
3.29E-05
0
20DB Other Agmahuml Equipment
D Agdwlural Equipment
2008
018
1183
053
588E -03
0.00E+00
038E 47
581
2
2008 Other Agnwluml Equipment
D Agricultural Equipment
2007
0.71
0.87
055
608E -03
000E+00
68.7E -07
6.10E -03
2
2008 Omer AgncuNnl Equipment
D AgriSmaral Equipment
2006
0.59
On
047
511E -03
000100
556E -07
512E -03
2
208 Other AgrkMurm Equipment
D Agncultural Equipment
2005
039
0.48
0.31
3.39E-03
0.00E-00
3.61
3.391
1
2008 Other Agnultunl Equipment
D Agricultural Equipment
2004
0.48
0.59
0.38
4.16E-03
0.00E -00
5.01BE 4)7
4.17E-03
I
2008 Omer Agmulunl Equipment
D Agriii Equipment
203
0.58
071
046
5.01E-03
000E+00
6.13E 07
5.03E-03
2
2008 Other Agmulunl Equipment
D Agrkultural Equipment
2002
0.55
067
043
489E-03
0.00600
5.73E -07
4 .70E-03
2
2000 Ober Agrkulturm Equipment
D Agricultural Equipment
2001
0.5
0.61
039
4.31E -03
OBOE -00
527E -07
4.32E-03
1
2000 Other Agricultural Equipment
D Agncultund Equipment
2000
0.48
0.59
0 .38
4.13E -03
0.00E+00
5.05E -07
4.14E-0t
1
Agricultural Emissions (Los Gatos as a Percent of the County of Santa Clara's Agricultural Land) - Offroad Year 2008
CY Equipment
Fuel Class
619
Populate
n
Axlhrity
(houNBay)
Consumpi
I
CO2 Exhaust NZOEx^aust CN4&haust
CO2e
CO2e
2OW othp Agrrullural Equipment
D Agncultunl Equipment
INS
0.45
D.w
0.36
3.91E-03
O.00E -00
137E-06
394E-03
1
2008 other Agreutual Equipment
O Agricultural Equipment
1998
0.42
D.51
0.33
3.60E-03
O.WE400
127E 06
3.00E 43
1
2008 peer Agricultural Equipment
D Agricultural Equipment
1997
028
0.32
021
226E-03
Owi
9.041
2.281
1
2008 00er Agrkulural Equipment
D Agricultural Equipment
INS
023
028
018
1.86E -03
000E+00
8.89E -07
1.90E -03
1
2000 Omer Agriculuml Equipment
D Agnwltural Equipment
INS
01
0.18
0.12
124E -03
OOOESW
4.37E -07
125E-03
0
2000 "her Agnwlunl Equipment
D Agnwuural Equipment
1994
0102
ON
0.02
1.97E-04
O.00E-00
6.92E-08
1.90E-00
0
2008 "her AgMultural Equipment
D Agricultural Equipment
1993
ON
ON
095
5.30E -p4
0.00E-00
1.88E-07
533E-04
0
2008 Other Agricultural Equipment
D Anneumnal Equipment
1992
0.09
0.11
0.07
7.63E+0.1
OME400
2.60E -07
269E-04
0
2000 Other Agricultural Equipment
D Agrkultunl Equipment
1991
0.06
0.07
0.05
5.16E -M
O.DOE400
1.81E -07
520E-04
0
2008 Met Agricultural Equipment
D AgkuXunl Equipment
INN
091
D.w
0.03
3.47E -N
0.00E +w
1.22E -07
3.50E-04
0
2000 other Agricultural Equipment
O Agricultural Equipment
INS,
0.00
0.03
0.02
224E -W
090E +w
TWE 08
225E-01
0
2000 "her Agriwlmal Equipment
D Agreultunl Equipment
1988
O.N
0.02
0.01
1.30E-01
O.00E.N
4.57E -08
131E-01
0
2008 OherAgncMUnl Equipment
D AgncuXUnl Equipment
1907
0.01
0.01
0
452E-05
090E+00
1.59E -08
4.55E-05
0
2008 "her Agricultural Equipment
D Agricultural Equipment
2008
037
0.39
OAS
5.00E-03
0.00E+00
1.10E -07
5.00E -03
2
2ON Mer Agricultural Equipment
D Agricultural Equipment
2007
0.38 -
ON
0.44
4.01
0.00E+00
2.61
488E -03
2
2008 "her Agricultural Equipment
D AgnauXUml Equipment
2006
0.35
01
0.42
4.62E -03
000E+00
2.67E -07
4.63E-03
2
2008 "her Agrkultursl Equipment
D Agricultural Equipment
2005
0.33
0.35
0.41
4.47E-03
0.00E+0D
4.05E -07
4.47E -03
1
2000 Other Amemunl Equipment
D Agrkultunl Equpmenl
2004
0.33
D.M
0.4
4.41E-03
0.00E+00
8.96E-07
4.42E-03
1
2000 other Agricultural Equipment
O Agricultural Equipment
2103
0.33
O.M
0.41
4.39E -03
0.00&00
1.57E -06
4 .43E-03
1
2000 other Agriwlms Equipment
O Aunts ural Equipment
2002
0.32
D.34
OA
429E -03
O.00EMO
158E-06
432E-03
1
2008 Other Agriwluml Equipment
D Agreement Equipment
2001
0.31
0.33
039
4.16E-03
0.00&00
IMEEN
420E-03
1
2OW clear Agricultural Equipment
D Amasiftral Equipment
2000
0.31
0.32
01
4.10E -03
OWE+00
100E-0O
4.13E-03
1
2008 Must A ricuXual Equipment
D Agncuuunl Equipment
1899
0.3 -
0.32
0.38
4.05E-03
0.0E+0lt
1.67E-06
4.08E-03
1
2008 OI^er AgrlwXuml Equipment
D Agricultural Equipment
1990
0.3
0J1
0.37
3.95E -03
0.00E+00
2.00E -06
4.00E -03
1
2009 M. Agramumal Equipment
O Agricultural Equipment
1997
0.46
0."
0.58
6.19E -03
O.00E100
3.37E -06
626E-03
2
2000 other Agricultural Equipment
D Agricultural Equipment
1998
0.54
0.57
0.68
7.25E-03
0.00E+00
4.07E -00
234E -03
2
21108 Other Agricultural Equipment
D Agriwuurel Equipment
INS
0.32
O.w
0.4
4.27E -03
0.00E+00
247E -06
4.32E -03
1
2008 "her Agticuhural Equipment
D Agnwltural Equipment
1993
0.14
0.15
010
1.89E-03
000E+00
1.15E -06
1.91E-03
1
2008 "her Agricultural Equipment
D Agnwllural Equipment
1992
021
021
026
274E-03
0Wi
1.72E-06
2.78E-03
1
2000 "her Agricultural Equipment
D Agricultural Equipment
1991
0.12
0.12
OAS
1.58E-03
000E+00
1.02E-06
IAOEW
1
2008 OmeMgOCummil Equipment
D Agricultural Equipment
1 N
009
0.0
0.11
1.14E-03
000E +00
7.57E -07
1.16E-03
0
Equipment
D Agesultural Equipment
1989
ON
0.08
0.1
LNEw
0.00600
6.93E -0]
1.01E-03
0
2000 Ot e^ r A94ccuuwal q
D Agricultural & ui ment
INS
0.07
0.07
0.09
9.31E-00
0.00E-00
6.47E -07
845E-04
0
2000 "her Agreuuuml Equipment
D AgriwXunl Equipment
1987
OM
D.w
ON
7.89E-04
O.00E +w
5.74E 07
0.01E-04
0
2008 Other Agricultural Equipment
D And.huill Equipment
1986
0.05
ON
0.07
6.98E-04
0.00E +w
520E -07
7.09E-04
0
2008 Other Agricultural Equipment
D Agricultural Equipment
1985
ON
005
ON
8.17E-04
0.00E +w
4.70E -07
6.27E-04
0
2008 Other Agricultural Equipment
D Anscaltunl Equipment
1 N
0.04
0,04
005
526E -M
000E+00
4.10E -07
5.35E-0t
0
2008 "her Agricultural Equipment
D Agricultural Equipment
1983
003
0.03
01
4.25E-0I
0.00E+00
3.3BE -07
4.32E-06
0
2008 Omer Agricultural Equipment
D Agricultural Equipment
1902
O.N
0.03
0.W
3.44E -00
0.00E+00
2.80E -07
3.50E-0I
0
2000 other Agreulural Equipment
D Agricultural Equipment
1901
0.02
0.02
0.02
2.53E-04
D.00E+00
2.10E -07
2.57E-04
0
2008 Other Agneuumm Equipment
D Agnwltural Equipment
1960
0.02
0.02
0.02
2.02E -04
D90E +00
1J1E -07
206E-04
a
2008 "her Agriwlunl Equipment
D Agricultural Equipment
1009
0.01
0.01
0.01
1.42E-00
0.00E+00
122E07
144E-04
0
2008 "her Agricultural Equipment
D Agreulunl Equipment
1978
0.01
091
0.01
7.59E-05
0.00E+4w
11
773E -05
0
2008 "her Agricultural Equipment
D Agricultural Equipment
1977
0
0
0
2.53E -05
O.00E+w
225E-08
2.58E-05
0
2008 "her Agricultural Equipment
D Agecultural Equipment
2008
126
1.32
3.07
3.38E-02
0.00E+00
7.06E -07
3.38E -02
11
2008 Omer Agricultural Equipment
D Agricultural Equipment
2007
1.23
1.29
2.99
3.29E-02
0.00E+00
172E -06
3.29E-02
11
2008 other Agncultur4l Equipment
D Agricultural Equipment
2008
1.17
1.22
280
3.12E -02
0.00E-00
1.32E -00
3.12E -02
10
2000 "her Agricultural Equipment
D Agricultural Equipment
2005
1.13
1.18
275
3.02E -02
000E+00
1.87E-06
302E-02
10
2000 Other Agriculunl Equipment
D Agncullunl Equipment
2000
1.11
1.16
272
298E -02
O.WE+w
2.97E -06
298E-0Z
10
2000 "her Agresti Equipment
D Agnwltural Equipment
2003
1.11
1.16
272
2.97E-02
0.00E+00
6.20E-06
2.981
10
2008 Cher Agricultural Equipment
D Agricultural Equipment
2002
1.00
113
268
2.89E -02
0.00E+w
6.15E-00
2.91E -02
10
2008 Other Agricultural Equipment
D Agreement Equipment
2001
1.05
1.1
2.58
2.81E-02
0.00E+00
6.08E+06
282E-02
9
2008 Mair Agricultural Equipment
D Agricultural Equipment
2000
IN
1.00
2.54
271FE412
O.00E+00
6.06E-06
2.78E-02
9
2008 "her Agricultural Equipment
D A9rieutlull Equipment
INN
l.w
1.07
2.51
2.73E-02
OwE +w
6.09E-06
275E -02
9
2000 "her Agriwmeal Equipment
D Agricultural Equipment
1990
1
IN
245
200E-02
000E +w
8.02E-06
260E-02
9
2000 "her Agricultural Equipment
D Agricultural Equipment
1997
1.58
1.83
304
4.10E-02
090E+00
9.57E-00
4.20E -02
14
2000 other Fgreulual Equipment
D Agricultural Equipment
1996
183
1.92
451
400E -02
0.00E+00
1.14E -05
492E-02
16
2008 "her Agrkuhural Equipment
D Agriwuural Equipment
INS
198
1.13
265
2.09E-02
0.00E+00
6.80E -06
290E-02
10
2OOB other Agricultural Equipment
D Agmunoral Equipment
1993
0."
0.5
1.17
127E -02
D.00E4011
3.00E-06
1.28E-02
4
2000 Other Agricultural Equipment
D Agrisdural Equipment
1992
069
032
1.71
1.115E -02
D.00&00
4.55E-06
1.86E-02
6
2008 Other Agricultural Equipment
O Agrkuumal Equmment
1991
0.4
0.42
0.96
1.07E-02
0.00E+4w
Z65EN
1.07E-02
4
2008 "her Agricultural Equipment
D Agricultural Equipment
1900
029
0.3
071
7.73E -03
000E4w
1 M w
7PEW
3
2008 Other Agricultural Equipment
D Agncultunl Equpment
1989
026
0.27
061
6.90E -03
0.00E+0D
1.76E -00
6 9
2
2008 Omer PgriwXunl Equipment
D Atimmunal Equipment
1 W
0244
0.25
0.58
629E-0S
090E+00
1.61
6.32E -N
2
2008 Melt Agricultural Equipment
D Agecumural Equipment
1907
02
0.21
0.5
5.33E-03
O.00E+0D
2.03E-06
5.37E -03
2
2000 "her Agricultural Equipment
D Agncuuural Equipment
law
0.18
0.18
0.44
471E-03
0.00E+0O
1.02E -00
4.75E-03
2
200 "her A9oculual Equipment
D Agricultuml Equipment
INS
0.16
0.16
039
4.17E-03
O.Ow+00
1.00E -015
420E -03
1
2008 "her Agnwlunl Equipment
D Agricultural Equipment
1984
DA3
D.14
0.33
156E -N
0.00E+00
IAIE -00
3.50E -03
1
2000 Other Apriwltunl Equipment
D Agricultural Equipment
1983
0.11
0.11
027
287E-03
0.00&00
LASE -w
289E-03
1
2000 "her Agr Ruml Equipment
D Agncultmal Equipment
1982
0.09
0.00
022
2.32E-03
090E+00
91
234E+03
1
2008 "her AgncuXUnl Equipment
D Agricultural Equipment
1981
0.08
0.07
0.16
1.71E-03
090E+00
7.01E -07
1.72E -03
1
2008 "her Agrkutlunl Equipment
D Agricultural Equipment
1980
0.05
0.00
0.13
1.37E 4)3
O.DOE+00
5.68E -07
1.SBEas
0
2008 "her Agricultural Equipment
D Agricultural Equipment
1979
ON
0.04
ON
9.57E-00
O.NE+00
4.02E -07
065E-01
0
2008 Other Agnculunl Equipment
D Agriwlual Equipment
1978
O.w
aw
005
5.12E-04
O.00E +w
2,11
5
0
2008 "her Agrkutunl Equlpmem
D A9nwaunl Equipment
19"
0101
0.01
0.02
1.71E-01
0.00E+00
730E -N
-17E-04
132E-04
0
200"hertkreulunl Equipment
D Agnwnunl Equipment
2008
0.11
0.11
0.46
S.NE -03
OiNE+w
1.07E-00
SON-03
2
2000 "her Agricultural Equipment
D Agricultural Equipment
M7
0.1
0.11
045
4.96E -0.3
090E+00
1.13E -07
496E-03
2
2000 Other Agricutlual Equipment
O Apapetural Equipment
2006
0.1
0.1
043
431E -03
0.00E+00
1.70E -07
4.71E-03
2
2OW other Agricultural Equipment
D Agmuluml Equipment
2005
0.0
0.1
0.41
4.55E-03
O.O0E1W
1J3E -07
4.55E-03
2
2008 Other Agricultural Equipment
D Agricultural Equipment
2004
aw
0.1
0.41
4.49E-03
0.00E +00
2.32E -07
4.49E-03
t
2D08 curer Agricultural Equipment
D Agricultural Equipment
2003
ON
0.1
0.41
4AM -03
O.O0E+00
3.36E -07
4.48E-03
1
2008 Other Agricultural Equipment
D Agruxemal Equipment
2W2
01
O.N
0.4
4.3E -03
O.NE +W
6.37E -07
438E 43
1
2008 "her Agricultural Equipment
O A9naaltural Equipment
Zwl
OM
D.w
0.39
424E -03
O.ODi
629E -07
425E -03
1
2000 peer Agricultural Equipment
D Agmuninal Equipment
2000
O.N
OM
0.38
4.10E-03
OWE4w
028E -07
4.19E -03
1
2000 "her Agricultural Equipment
D Agricultural Equipment
19N
0.0
ON
0.38
4.12E -03
O.WE+w
61
4.14E-03
1
2008 "her Agmultunl Equipment
D Agmultual Equipment
INS
O.N
ON
0.37
4.03E -03
O.NE +00
61
4.04E -03
1
2008 "her Agreutural Equipment
D Agricultural Equipment
1997
0.13
0.14
1
6.300 -03
O.00E+W
9.91
6.32E-03
2
2008 "her Agricultural Equipment
D Agricultural Equipment
1900
0.15
01
ON
7.39E -03
O.ODE+00
1.18E -w
7.41E-03
2
2008 "her Agricultural Equipment
D Agnwltural Equipment
1N5
ON
0.0
0.4
4.35E-03
DMi
705E -07
437E -03
1
2008 Other Agreusu al Equipment
D Agriwlunl Equipment
1993
0.00
ON
OAS
1.92E-03
0.00E+00
320E -07
193E-03
1
Agricultural Emissions (Los Gatos as a Percent of the County of Santa Clara's Agricultural Land) - Offroad Year 2006.
PopuNllo
AclNay
Conzumpk,
CY Equlpmem
Fuel DNU
NY
in
(Imuraiaey)
n
CO2 Eitha int
N20 EaOauat
CM Eahzuat
CO2e
CO2e
2000 Omer AgrruBural Equipment
D Agnw2ml Equipment
1992
0.06
0.06
0.2fi
2.79E-03
000E+00
4 ,72E 437
280E -03
1
2000 Other Agricultural Equipment
D Agnwlunal Equipment
1991
003
0.03
0.15
1.61E -03
O.00EW
2,75E -07
1.62E -03
1
2008 Other Pgriwltuml Equipment
D AgriwSUml Equipment
1990
0.02
em
0.11
1.17E-0Q
O.00E+OO
2.02E -07
1.17E -03
0
2008 Other Agricultural Equipment
D AgruntmlEquipment
1909
0.02
0.02
0.1
101E -03
0.00E +00
1.83E -07
181E-03
0
2008 Other Agricultml Equipment
D Agricultural Equipment
1900
0.02
0.02
009
9.10E-0i
000E+00
1.69E -07
9.52E-01
0
2008 Omer Agnw3ural Equipment
D Agncultural Equpment
1907
OR
002
0.07
8.01E -W
000E+00
187E -07
808E-04
0
2008 Other Agnwltural Equipment
D Agmcultural Equumenl
1906
0.01
0.02
ON
7.11E -04
U.00E00
180E-07
7.15E-01
0
2008 Other Agnwltuol Equipment
D Agricultural Equipment
1985
0.01
0.01
000
629E -01
0.00E+00
1.50E -7
6.32E-0i
0
2008 Omer Agricultural Equipment
D Agricultural Equipment
11184
0.01
0.01
005
536E-01
0.00E +00
1.39E -7
5.39E-01
0
2000 Other Agricultural Equipment
D Agricultural Equipment
1983
0.01
0.01
001
433E-01
0.00E+00
1.13E -07
1.35E-0i
0
2000 Other Agricultural Equipment
D AgM'ullural Equipment
1982
0.01
0.01
083
3.50,01
000E +00
9.29E -W
152E-0i
0
2000 Omer Agricultural Equipment
D AgriwBural Equpment
1981
0.01
0.01
0.02
2.58E-0i
000E+W
691E -08
259E-01
0
2008 Other Agricultural Equipment
D Agricultual Equipment
1980
0
0
002
206E-01
0.00E-00
5.59E-08
2.07E -04
0
2008 Other Agricultural Equipment
D Agtlw11ual Equipment
1979
0
0
001
1.11E-01
0.00100
1.21E -08
1.15E-0i
0
2008 Other Agricultuml Equipment
D Agricultual Equipment
1970
0
0
001
773E 45
0.00E+00
2.28E -08
7.78E -05
D
2008 Other Ag&ultuml Equipment
D Agmkutlu it Equipment
190
0
0
0
260E -05
0.00E+00
7.66E -09
259E -05
0
2008 Other Agricultural Equipment
D Agricultural Equipment
well
0.11
0.11
067
738E-03
O.00E00
1.51E -07
738E-03
2
2008 "her Agncullual Equipment
D Agricultural Equipment
2007
DA
0.11
0.65
7.19E -03
O.00E -00
1.0E-7
7.19E-03
2
2000 Omer Agmcunural Equipment
D Agricultural Equipment
2006
0.1
01
062
6.82E -03
0.00E+00
1.92E -7
682E00
2
20W Other Agncu3ural Equipment
D Agrcultural Equipment
2005
089
0.1
OR
6.59E -00
O.00E011
1.97E -7
8.59E -03
2
2008 other Agncultuml Equipment
D Agricultmal Equipment
2001
0.09
0.1
059
6.WE -W
0.00E-00
2.28E -07
6.51E -03
2
2008 Omer AgnwOural Equipment
0 Agneullural Equipment
2003
009
0.1
0.59
618E-03
O.00E-W
2.91E 47
6.19E -03
2
2008 other Agrirultural Equipment
D Agricultural Equipment
2002
009
0.09
0.57
6.32E -03
000E-00
431E -07
6.33E-03
2
2000 other Agricultural Equipment
D Agnwltual Equipment
2001
009
009
ON
6.11E -03
OWE -00
120E -7
6.15EN
2
2008 Other Agricultural Equipment
D Agnwltual Equipment
2000
0.00
009
0.55
6.05E -03
0.00E-00
128E -07
8.05E-03
2
2008 Other Agricultural Equipment
D Agricultural Equipment
1099
0.09
0.09
050
5.97E-03
O.WE00
1.29E -07
5.98E-03
2
2(108 Other Ag&uWOl Equipment
D Agricultural Equipment
1998
O.W
4109
0W
683E -03
0.00E-00
4.25E -7
5.81E-0t
2
2008 Other Agmcultual Equipment
D Agrkunural Equipment
1997
0.13
0.14
0.83
9.13E -03
0.00100
678E -07
9.11E-03
3
2008 Other Agncullural Equipment
O Agricultural Equipment
1996
OAS
0.16
0.97
1.07E -02
000E+00
801E+07
1.07E-02
4
2008 Omer Agncultural Equipment
D Agricultural Equipment
1995
0.00
009
O.W
6.30E -W
000E-00
1.02E -06
6.33E-03
2
2008 Omer Agricultural Equipment
D Agnwllmal Equipment
1993
081
0.01
025
2.711E-0J
O.00E -00
1.00E -07
279E -03
1
2008 other Agricultural Equipment
D Agricultural Equipment
1992
0.06
0.00
0.37
1.05E -W
O.00E-W
8.83E -07
1.06E-03
1
2008 Other Agricultural Equipment
D Agncultuml Equipment
1991
0.03
0.00
0.21
2.MJR M
0.00E+00
3.99E -07
2.31E -03
1
2000 Other Agricultual Equipment
0 Agricultural Equipment
1990
0.02
083
OAS
1.69E-03
000E -00
2.93E -07
1.68E-03
i
2000 Other Agricultural Equipment
D Agncunmal Equipment
1989
0@
0.03
0.14
1.51E-03
0.00E -00
285E-07
t51E40
i
2000 Other Agricultural Equipment
D Agnwltural Equipment
low
002
0.02
0.13
1.37E -03
000E +W
1"E.7
138E-03
0
2008 Other Agricultural Equipment
D Agricultural Equipment
1987
0.02
OR
0.11
1.16E -03
0.001W
272E -07
1.17E -03
0
2008 Other Agricultural Equipment
D A9ricultuml Equipment
1986
0.01
0.02
0.1
1.03E-00
0.00E-00
2.13E -07
1.01E -03
0
MOB other Agricultural Equipment
0 Agricultural Equipment
19"
0.01
0.01
008
9.11E -04
000100
2.10E -07
9.15E-01
0
2008 Other Agmqullual Equipment
D Agnwlturel Equipment
1981
0.01
0.01
007
7 .76E -01
000E -00
2.01E -07
7.01E-01
0
IDW Other Agricultural Equipment
D Agricultural Equipment
1903
0.01
0.01
0.00
6.27E -04
0.00E -00
1.61E 47
830E-01
0
2008 other Agmwltual Equipment
D Agri ..I Equipment
1982
001
001
005
5.08E-01
080E-00
1.31E -07
SAOIEO4
0
2008 Other Agriwltmal Equipment
D Agnwlual Equipment
1981
0.01
0.01
003
373E-01
0.00E+00
1.00E -07
395E-0i
0
2008 other Agricultural Equipment
0 Agricultural Equipment
1980
0
0
0.03
2.99E-01
000E -00
8.10E -011
300E-0i
0
2008 Other Agricultural Equipment
D Agricultural Equipment
1979
0
0
0.02
2.09E -04
0.00E +00
6.10E+08
210E-0i
0
2000 Other Agricultural Equipment
D Agriwltual Equipment
1970
0
0
001
1.12E-01
O.00E-W
3.31E -08
1.13-10
0
2008 Other Agricultural Equipment
D Agriwltual Equipment
19P
0
0
0
3.73E -05
0.00E -00
1.11E -08
3.76E -05
0
2008 other Agricultural Equipment
D Agricultural Equipment
2008
0.03
0.03
0.23
2.50E -W
0.00E+0O
5.35E -08
2.56E -03
1
2000 Other Agricultural Equipment
0 Agriwnural Equipment
2007
0.02
0.00
023
2.49E -03
000E+00
5.67E -00
2WE-W
1
2000 Other Agmcultural Equipment
D Agricultural Equipment
2008
em
em
0.21
2.37E(o
0ODE +00
581E-00
237E-03
1
2000 other Agricultural Equipment
D Agm,01mat Equipment
2005
002
0.02
0.21
2.29E -03
0.00E-00
13.032-08
229E 433
1
2008 "her Agricultural Equipment
D Agricultural Equipment
200-
em
0.02
02
2.26E -00
0.00E+00
7.11E-08
228E -03
1
2000 Omer Agricultural Equipment
D Agricultural Equpment
2003
0.02
0.02
02
225E-03
0.00E -00
7.47E -08
225E -03
1
2001 "her Agricultural Equipment
D Agnwnuml Equipment
2002
0.02
0.02
0.2
219E-03
000E -00
0.35E -08
2.20E-03
1
2008 "her Agriculural Equipment
D Agricultural Equipment
2001
0.02
0.02
0.19
213E-41
000E -00
1.02E -07
2.13E -03
1
2000 Other Agricultural Equipment
D Agricultural Equipment
2000
002
OR
0.19
2.10E -03
000E+00
101E-07
210E-03
1
2008 Other Agricultural Equipment
D Agricultural Equipment
1999
002
0.02
0.19
2.07E -03
000E-00
1ME 07
208E -03
1
2000 Other Agricultural Equipment
D Agricultural Equpment
1998
002
002
018
2.02E-00
OBOE00
1.42E -07
203E-03
1
2008 "her Agricultural Equipment
D Apncultu2l Equipment
197
0.03
O.W
029
3.17E-03
O.00Er00
2.25E7
117E-0J
1
2008 Other Agriwltuml Equipment
D Agricultural Equipment
1996
0.01
084
031
371E-03
0.00E-00
266E -7
3,72E -03
1
2008 Other Agricultural Equipment
D Agricultural Equipment
1995
0.02
0.02
02
2.19E-03
0.00E -00
3.37E -7
220E -03
1
2008 other, Agricultural Equipment
D Agnwltural Equipment
1993
0.01
0.01
0.00
9.66E -04
000E+00
1.52E -7
9.69E-0I
0
2008 "her Agricultural Equipmenl
O Agricultural Equipment
1992
0.01
0.01
0.13
1.10E -03
0.00E-00
254E -7
1.41E -03
0
2000 "her Agricultural Equipment
D AgnwOural Equipment
1991
001
0.01
07
800E-0.I
0.00E-00
1.30E -07
8.12E-04
0
2000 "her Agricultural Equipment
D AgnwBuml Equipment
1990
0.01
0.01
005
5.86E-01
O.00E -00
9.53E -W
588E-04
0
2000 Other Agricultlml Equipment
D Agncultu it Equpment
19"
0.01
0.01
005
523E-01
0.00E+00
8.6OE -W
5.25E 04
0
2008 Other Agnwltual Equipment
D Agricultural EqupmeM
1988
0
0
ON
477E-01
0.00E +00
7.92EW
4.78E 04
0
2008 Other Agricultuml Equipment
D Agmcultuml Equipment
197
0
0
0.01
404E-04
0.00E-00
8.30E -08
1.06E -M
0
2008 Cther AgmultmlEquipment
D Agrkunual Equipment
1986
0
0
003
3.58E-04
0.00E +00
749E -Olt
3.59E-04
0
2008 "her AgnwWral Equipment
D Agricultural Equipment
1985
0
0
003
3.16E -04
0.00E -00
6A9E -08
3.18E-04
0
2008 Other Agricultural Equipment
D Agricunu it Equipment
1984
0
0
0W
269E-0I
0.00E -W
6.17E -08
2.71E -04
0
2008 "her Agncultural Equipment
D Agnwltural Equipment
1983
0
0
002
2.10E -01
0.00E-00
5.03E -W
2.19E-0i
0
2008 Other Agrpultuml Equipment
D A,.R.at Equipment
1982
0
0
0.02
176E -7
000E+00
1.12E -00
177E-01
0
2008 Omer Agmiultuml Equipment
D Agnwltml Equipment
1981
0
0
0.01
1.30E-04
000E+00
300E-08
1.30E-0i
0
2008 Other Agricultural Equipment
D Agnwltual Equipment
1980
0
0
0.01
1.01E-04
O.WE-00
247E.03
1.01E-01
0
2008 other AgWultural Equipment
D AgncuBural Equipment
1919
0
0
001
7.26E -05
0.00c--00
1.84E -08
729E 4)5
0
2008 Other Agricultural Equipment
D Agmu8ural Equpment
1978
0
0
0
3.89E -05
0.00E +00
9.95E -00
301E -05
0
A P P E N D I X C
G H G EMISSIONS REDUCTIONS
MEASURES MODELING DATA
Quantified GHG Measure Reductions Summary
Range of GHG Reductions
Reductions from 2020 BAU
from VMT (MTons)
Transportation
State and Federal Program: Pavley Fuel Efficiency & Low Carbon Fuel Standard (LCFS) 68,120
Measure TR -la: Ra. Require all new buildings, excluding single-family homes, to include a principal functional entry that faces a
public space such as a street. square, park, pares, or plaza, in addition to any entrance from a parking lop to encourage pedestrian
foot traffic
Measure TR -lb: b. Require new projects, excluding single-family homes, to include pedestrian or bicycle through - connections to
Measure TR -1C c Seek grant funding to establish a Safe Routes to Scholl (SR25) Program w increase more student walking and
biking trips. The program may include: conducting school walking audits, improving nearby pedestrian and biryde fast ties. 780
implementing nearby traffic-calming measures, implementing school bus, vanpool, and carpools to school, implementing walking
buses w schools, coordinating school schedules to not overlap with Peak commute times, conducting traffic studies for specific
schools for more efficient dropaff and pick -up activity at schools (e.g. staggered schedules, changing on-street parking to loading
zones, and more), and increasing speed enforcement amund schools.
Measure TR -1d: d. Design and implement affordable traffic-calming measures on specific streets to dissuade Highway 17 cut -
through traffic and attract Pedestrian and bicycle traffic.
e. Implement transit access improvements through sidewalk/crosswalk safety enhancements and bus shaker
Measure TR -2: Require a variety of local - serving commercial uses and encourage mixed -use development in the North Forty I 1,330
rea
a, reducing VMT.
Measure TR -3: Provide a fixed -route shuttle system to the Downtown area from key residential areas, employment and 120
commercial renters, Vesture Light Rail, and Vasona Park.
Measure TR-4a: ..Install new bicycle facilities throughout the existing Town street network to close bicycle network gap%as
hunched! in General Plan. 1 1 3,430
Measure TR -0b: b. Require bicycle parking bother and on -site showers in major non-residential development and
redevelopment projects. Major development projects include buildings that would accommodate more than 50 employees, whether 210
in a single business or multiple tenants; major redevelopment projects include projects that change 50 permnt or more of the square
footage or wall space.
Measure TR -4C c. Install highyualr y bicycle - parking facilities Downtown in centralized, sale, and secure areas.
Measure TR -4d: d. Encourage non -profit or volunteer organizations in creatfing a bicycle- sharing program.
Measure TR -S: Implement a school Pool Program that helps match parents to carpool students to school.
Measure TR -6a: Encourage a voluntary Employer Commute Trip Reduction Program for new and existing development This
would be a multi - strategy program that encompasses a combination of individual measures, such as nde-share programs, discounted
transit programs, end-of-trip holders le, showers and lockers[ encouraging telecommuting, and preferential parking permit
programs. M part of this program, encourage employers to allow commuters to pay for transit with pre-tax dollars.
Measure TR -6b: Encourage new nor - residential development o include designated or preferred parking for vanpcols, carpools,
and electric vehicles. 990
Measure TR -6C Encourage non- pmfitor volunteerorganhations in creating or providing a rar- shadng program.
Measure TR -7: Coordinate with local school dbtdm on marketing, promoting, and educating students about the benefits of
using public transit as a mode of travel.
Measure TR -8d: Provide better wayfinding and smart parking strategies with attractive signage to reduce vehicle circulation
searching for parking spares in the C -2 /Centel Business District Zone.
Measure TR -8e: Encourage non -profit and volunteerorgamzadons in conductingoufreach to reduce car tiling mound schools
during pick -up and cimpofftimes.
Subtotal Transportation I NA I 71,550
Quantified GHG Measure Reductions Summary
Range of GHG Reductions
Reductions from 2020 BAU
from VMT (MTons)
Residential & Commercial
State Program: 33% Renewable Portfolio Standard (Reduction in GHG Intensity includes Cap and Trade and other Early Actionarequlyd by
31,600
PG &E)
State Program: Title 24 California Building Code Cycle Updates (2005 to 2mg)
10,290
State Program: Smart Grid
760
Measure GB -1: Develop a Green Building Ordinance Oatrequareenergy- effc< ec:- gn, in excess of ntle,24 standards, for all new esidential and
on- residential buildings. When developing the Ordinance, consider development -I,- r -Welds for when certain requirements are triggered.
-.,
2'210
• Require 30 percent above the 2008 Building and Energy Efficientystacfards'.r -_ o- -dewrth the Voluntaryrui-2 standards of the
California Green Building Code (CALGreen). (Note: Most residential energy effc _ -, -,_ -.- ; drams for builders begin at 15 percent above Title 24
standards.)
•Encourage the use of cement substitutes and rerycled building materials for new construction.
Measure GB -2: Require all new and signifcantly remodeled homes to follow the Town's adopted GmenPoint Rated Building Guidelines. significantly
remodeled homes include remodels of 50 Percent or more of the square footage or wall area of the home, and additions of 50 percent or more of the
170
some footage or wall area of the home.
Measure GB -3: Allow greater development flexibility, and other incentives (e.g. permitting - related) for LEED silver certification or equivalent
GreenPoint rating, for example, by giving green projects priority in plan review and processing.
Measure IS B-4: Require measures that reduce energy use through solar orientation by taking advantage of shade, prevailing winds, landscaping. and
_
wind screens.
Measure GB -5: Identify and remove regulatory or procedural harriers to implementing green building practices in the Town, by updating codes,
_
guidelines, and coning.
Measure GB -6: Coordinate with other local governments, special distrim, nonprofits, and other public organiretions to share resources, achieve
—
economies of scale, and develop green building policies and programs Nat are optimized on a regional scale.
Measure RE -1: In partnership with Pacific Gas and Electric and local alter atve energy companies, develop an Alternative Energy Development Plan
Oat includes townwide measurable goals and identifies the allowable and appropriate alternative energy facility types within the town, such as solar
photovoltaic (PV) on urban residential and commercial roofs. Propose phasing and timing of alternative energy facility and infrastructure development.
10
Provide the development review process list/worksheet to new alternative energy projects and conduct a review ofTOwn Pe iciez and ordinances to address
alternative energy production. Identify optimal locations and the best means to avoid noise, aesthetic, and other potential Mind use compatibility conflicts
left., installing backing solar PV or angling fixed solar PV in a manner Oat reduces glare to surrounding land uses). Consider further reducing permitting fees
for alternative energy development.
Measure RE -2: Require that residential projects of six units or more participate in the California Energy Commission's New Solar Homes Partnership,
which provides rebates to developers of six units or more who offer solar Power in 50 percent of new units and is a component of the California Solar
470
primitive, or a similar program with solar power requirements equal to or greater than those of the California Energy Commission's New Solar Homes
Partnership.
Measure RE -3: Require that new or major rehabilitations of commemial,offce, or industrial development greater than or equal to 20,000 square feet
in size incorporate solar or other renewable energy generation to provide 15 percent or more of the project's energy needs. Major rehabilitations are
330
defined as remodeling/adchrons 020,00D square feet ofoffice /retail comme rcial or 100,000 square feet of industrial floor area. Remove regulatorybamiers
to Incorporating renewable energy generation.
Measure RE -$: Where feasible, require that all new buildings be constructed to allow for the easy, cost -affective installation of future solar energy
systems. -solar ready' features should include: proper solar orientation (i.e., south facing roof area sloped at 20-to 55- hear the horinci dearaccess on
the south sloped roof (i.e., no chimneys, heating vents, plumbing vents, etc.); electrical conduit installed for solar electric system wiring; plumbing installed
for solar hot water system; and space provided for a solar hot water storage fork.
Measure RE -6: workwHh the local school districts to encourage the use of solar energy systems at school facilities.
—
MeasureRE- 7:Suppart and participate in regional efforts to study the feasibility and interest in establishing community choice aggregation in Los
Gatos.
—
Quantified GHG Measure Reductions Summary
Range of GHG Reductions
Reductions from 2020 BAU
from VMT (MTons)
Measure EC -1: Require new development to use energy-efficient appliances that meet ENERGY STAR standards and energ efficient lighting
technologies that exceed Title 24 standards by 30 percent
10
Measure EC-2: Partner with Pacific Gas & Electric and other appropriate energy providers to promote energy conservation, including the following:
• Promote the purchase of ENERGY STAR appliances.
• Distribute free compact fluorescent light (CFO bulbs and /or fixtures W community members.
• Offer a halogen too:hiere lamp exchange to community members.
• Promote energy effeienryaudits of existing buildings to check, repair, and readjust heating, ventilation, air mndftionin& lighting, water heating
equipment, insulation, and weatherization.
30
• Partner with the Silimn Valley Association of Realtors to encourage energy audgz to be performed when residential and commercial buildings are
sold. Energy audits will include information regarding the opportunities for energy eRciency, improvements, and will be presented to the buyer.
• commercial buildings to be'benchmarked" using EPA's ENERGY STAR Portfolio Manager Tool, consistent with All 1103, which requires disclosure of
commercial buildings energy efficiency rating.
• Promote individualized energy management planning and related services for large energy users.
• Fund and schedule energy efficiency mtmfits or "tune -ups of existing buildings.
• Pursue incentives and grants for energy conservation.
Measure EC -3: Require outdoor lighting fixtures to be energy-effident. Require parking lot light fixtures and light fixtures on buildings to be on full cut-
off fixtures, except emergency exit or safety lighting, and all permanently installed exterior, lighting shall be controlled by either a photocell or an
or
astronomical time search. Prohibit continuous all night outdoor lighting in construction sites unless required forsecurity reasons. Revlsethe Town Codeto
2$0
include Nose requirements.
Measure EC-4: Comme the gill -A -Wan Electricity Usage Monitor program, through which residents can check out a device from the that can be
plugged into household electronics to see how much electricity they require.
—
Measure EC -5: Seek funding to implement a low- income weatheriaation program.
—
Measure EC-6: Provide links to and/or contact information an the Town's website for education and outreach by outside organuaWns that promote
quality insulation installation (OR), which eliminates gaps in buildings.
—
Measure EC -7: Compile a list of funding sources that local residents, businesses, or the Town could potentially access to fund energy aud"ds to inform
homeowners and businesses of opportunities to improve the energy efficiency of their homes ark buildings.
Measure EC -g: Continue participation in the CafdomuFIRST program, which provides innovafive, low- interest financing for energy efficiency projects
for exerting and new development.
—
Measure EC -9: Develop a'heat island' mitigation plan that Includes guidelines for pool roofs, cool pavements, and strategically placed shade trees.
Amend the applicable Design Guidelines to integrate the guidelines. Evaluate and balance tradeoffs between solar access and landscape tree shading in
—
Design Gui felines.
Measure EC -10: Require all new development and major rehabilitation (i.e., additions orremodels of 20,1MD square feet of office /retail commercial or
100,000 square feet of industrial floor area) projects m incorporate any combination of the following strategies to reduce heat gain for 50 percent of the
on -roof impervious sae landsmpe, which includes roads, sidewalks, courtyards, parking lots, and driveways: shocked within five years of occupancy; paving
materials with a Solar Reflectance Index (SRI) of at least 29; open grid pavement system; and parking spaces underground, uderdeck, under roof, or under
a building. Any roof used to shade orcover parking must have an SRI of at least 29.
Measure EC -11: Encourage the installation of programmable thermostats in existing residential and commercial buildings.
—
Measure E[ -12: Form a wlunteer committee of tool design professionals m create a brochure to educate chosen on how to save energythmugh
design.
—
Measure CA -1: Develop and implement an outreach plan to engage local businesses in climate change reduction programs.
—
Subtotal Residential & Commercial
46,160
Quantified GHG Measure Reductions Summary
Range of
GHG Reductions
Reductions
from 2020 BAU
from VMT
(MTons)
Water /Wastewater
State Program: 33% Renewable Portfolio Standard indirect GHG emissions born water transport, treatment, conveyance, and wastewater
1,140
Measure WW-1: For new development, require all water use and effiuency measures identified as voluntary in the Ceifomla Green Bustling standards
Code, and consider more stringent targets. Cal'domb Green Building standards Cade requirements include: 1) reduce indoor potable water use by 20
p,aam after meeting the Energy Policy Act of 1992 nature perfarmaMe requirements, and 2) reduce outdoor potable water use by 50 percent from a
calibrated mid- summerbireline one. for example, through irrigation efficiency, plant species, recycled wastewater, and captured rainwater. Establish Town
70
requirements for dbrretionary, pmjem regarding watering timing, water - efficient irrigation equipment, water efficient fixtures, and offsetting demand so
thatthere isnonet increasein importerlwater use. ImArde dear parameters for integrating water conservation infaStmcture and technologies ,including
kw -flush toilets and low -flow showermads. M appropriate, partner with idol wawrwnsemetion Companies on the devekpmentesnd impkmenntion of
this measure.
Measure WW-2a: Adopt a water efficiency retrofit ordinance that requires upgrades as a condition of issuing permits for renovations or additions.
Work with local water purveyors to achieve consistent standards and review and approval procedures kr implementation.
Measure Will b. Work with the San lose Water company (SYNC) and sane tare Valley Water District (XYWO) to adopt water conservation
pricing, such as tiered rate structures, to encourage efficient water use. As part of this measure, the water districts would conduct the following:
440
• Provide notices in each billing W aocmums with water use budgets showing the relationship between the budget and actual consumption.
• Encourage wholesale water suppliers to provide financial incentives to their retail water agency customers that encourage water conservation
efforts.
• Work with s. WCto metar with commodity rates for all new connections, and retrofit existing connections.
• Create accounts with dedicated irrigation meters, or develop and implement a strategy targeting and marketing large landscape water use surveys to
commerual/industd ilimni tutional accounts with nabactuse meters to help monitor landscaping water use.
Measure WW -3 Require new development to use native plant, or other appropriate noninvasive plants that are drought- tolerant, as described in the
_
Bay Friendly landscaping Guidelines, available at StopWasteorg and BayFriendlyCoalhion.org.
Measure WW-4: Reviewesnd update the Town's Water Efficient landscape Ordinance with improved conservation programs and incentives for non-
_
residential customers that are consistent with the Tier I water conservation standards of Title 20.
Measure WW-5: In collaboration with efforts by the San lose water company (SIWC) and the sane Oases Valley Water District (SCVND), promote
water audit programs that offnfram waterinein to single( amily. muhtf amily, large bodsope accounts, and commercial customers. Collaboratewith
_
purveyors n enact conservation programs for commercial, industrial, and institutional (Cal accounts and create programs to install ulna -kw -flush toilets In
facilities.
Measure WW-6: Adopt a residential rainwater callettion policy and update the Zoning Cade as nettled to support permitting and regulation of
residential rainwater systems.
Subtotal Water/Wastewater
1,650
Quantified GHG Measure Reductions Summary
Range of
GHG Reductions
Reductions
from 2020 BAU
from VMT
(MTons)
Waste Disposal
State Program: Existing 311 (Reduce, Reuse, Recycling) Programs under Assembly Bill 939 and 341 (supported by
Measures SW -1 through SW -g)
Measure SW -1: Revue the as tmg construction and demolition oniimnce to require ae least 50 percent diversion li.e reuse or recydingl of mm-
Measure SW-2: Require all new and significant redevekspments /remodels ofeauting multi - family developments to provide recycling areas fortheir
resdentswhhin existing trash areas. Signific nt redevelopments and remodefs Include those that add or change W percent or more of the square footage
orwallarea.
Measure SW-3: Encourage the use of salvaged and recycledcontent materials and other materiais that have low production eneWcorts for building
v..,,w and ponce waneoisposai enmies to keep too0 aid green wasteout oflandfills.
Measure SW -5: Work with public and private waste disposal entities to incentraze reryclingand composting. 4,770
Measure SW -$: continue to provide rerycling containers in the Downtown area.
Measure SW -7: Expand educed onal programs to inform residentsabout reuse, recycling, composting, waste to energy, and zero waste programs.
Measure SW -g: Adopt an ordinance W ban the use of plartic bags in Los Gatos.
MeasureS W -9: Develop Milder. inardws, and design guidelines thatencouragethe publicand private purchase and useofdurableand nondurable
items, including bundling materials, made from rerycled materials or renewable resources.
Measure SW-10: Aim Wachievethe 75 percentwaste diversion goal established by AB 301.
Measure P -1: Develop policies, incentives, and design guidelines that encourage the public and private purchase and use of durable and nordurable
hems, including building materials, made from recycled materials orrenev,able resources.
Subtotal Waste Disposal 4,770
Quantified GHG Measure Reductions Summary
Range of GHG Reductions
Reductions from 2020 BAU
from VMT (MTons)
Other
State Program: Low Carbon Fuel Standard (LCFS)
380
Measure REA consideradapte, an ordinance to ban the use of two-stroke engine leaf blowers. As part of this ordinance, establish plantingand
maintenance guidelines to reduce maintenance needs.
—
Measure OS -1: literary and inventory potential community garden and urban farm sites on public easements, Pacific Gas& Electric Company (PG &E)
easements,rightrof- ways, and schooyards, and develop a program to establish community 'arderis in appropriate locations.
—
Measure OS-2: Encourage significant new residential developments over 50 units to include space that an be used to grow food.
—
Measure OS -3: Establish a process through which a neighborhood an propose and adopts site as a community garden.
—
Measure OSA: Continue to support the Los Gatos Farmers' Marketaa a source for locally grown food.
Measure OS -5: Encourage the Los Gatos farmers market to adept food sumps and other public hood benefits.
—
Measure OS-6: Continue to activelypursue wildland fire prevention in forested areas of Los Gatos to avoid loss ofarbon sequestration.
Measure CA-2: Establish and maintain a'susbinabildy information center at the Town Hall arubraryto inform the public and distribute available
brochures, and provide information on sustainabilayon the TOwn s website. Emphasize on -line outreach materials to minimize paper consumption.
—
Measure CA -3: Continue the Los Gatos: Growing Greener Together Campaign. which provides Town employees and community members with a
newsletter featuring green tips and best practices for home and at work. Errand this program to provide best practice Information at public venues, such as
the farmers market.
Measure CAA: Continue economic vitality programs aimed at supporting local business by encouraging residents to shop ball'.
—
Measure CA-5: Support voluntary programs to improve sustainability in Los Gatos.
Subtotal Other
380
TOTAL Reductions from 2020 BAU
TOTAL 2020 BAU
TOTAL Reductions Needed
124,510
State + Federal Measures 117,060
Local Measures 7,450
445,670
121,280
Energy & Green Buildings Measures
Electricity
Existing
Natural Gas
Natural Gas
Existing
Annual Electricity
Title 24
Annual Electricity
Annual Natural Gas
Usage (KWh) GHG (MTons)
Annual Natural Gas
Usage (Therms) GHG (MTons)
Residential
Usage (KWh)
GHG (MTons)
905,452 5,757
Usage (Therms)
GHG (MTons)
Residential
96,708,760
25,524
Residential
6,864,462
43,649
Non - Residential
106,638,269
28,177
Non - Residential
3,018,720
19,195
Total
203,347,029
53,701
Total
9,883,182
62,844
- -••••• ....... ........ ........... ......a-al gas use Tor me t Own or ms Gatos based an del for years 2006 through 2008 provided by PG &E using third -party verified GHG emission factors
submitted to the Cegfomia Climate Action Registry.
Electricity
New Units /SQFT
Natural Gas
New Units /SQFT
Existing Kwh New Kwh
Annual Electricity
Title 24
Annual Natural Gas
Annual Natural Gas
Usage (KWh) GHG (MTons)
80,034,836 10,556,945
Usage (Therms) GHG (MTons)
Residential
12,756,308 3,367
Residential
905,452 5,757
Non - Residential
24,644,366 6,511
Non - Residential
697,634 4,436
Total
37.400.674 4.R7R
Trstnl
131,282,635
2020 BAU increase in electricity and natural gas use for the Town of Los Gatos based on the estimated increase in residential units and non - residential square footage projected by the Town
and existing 2006 through 2008 emission rates provided by PG &E using third -party vedhed GIG emission factors ssd mmrad to the Califomia Climate Action Regist,
Electricity
Total 2020 BAU
Natural Gas
Total 2020 BAU
Existing Kwh New Kwh
Annual Electricity
Title 24
12,056,530 7590,309
Annual Natural Gas
Non -Title 24
80,034,836 10,556,945
Usage (KWh)
GHG (MTons)
92,091,366 12,147,254
Usage (Therms)
GHG (MTons)
Residential
109,465,068
28,891
Residential
7,769,914
49,406
Non - Residential
131,282,635
34,688
Non - Residential
3,716,354
23,631
Total
240,747,703
63,579
Total
11,486,268
73,037
Electricity
Residential
Non - Residential
Existing Kwh New Kwh
Existing Kwh New Kwh
Title 24
12,056,530 7590,309
72,442,534 16,741,648
Non -Title 24
80,034,836 10,556,945
34,076,587 7,875,183
92,091,366 12,147,254
106,519,120 24,616,830
Natural Gas
Residential
Non- Residential
Existing Therms New Therms
Existing Therms New Therms
Title 24
6,040,727 796,798
2,058,767 475,786
Non -Title 24
823,735 108,654
959,953 221,848
6,864,462 905,452
3,018,720 697,634
Sources: Brown, Richard E. and Koomey, Jonathan G., 2W2, May. Electricity Use in California: Past Trends and Present Usage Pattems. University of Cstifomia,
Berkeley (U ®l. Energy analysis Department, Environmental Energy Technologies Division, Ernest Orlando tawrence Berkeley National laboratory. 181.47992.
hf tp:// enduse .lbi.gov /Pmjects /CAdata.htm];C Where, Energy Commission. Residential End Use Survey.
hUp: / /energyalmenac.oeov /nat maps /msWential_use.html; and California Energy Commission. 2006, March. Califomia Commercial End -Use 5urvey. Prepared
by Won. CEC -40D -2 W 6-005.
Energy & Green Buildings Measures
Measure RE -2:
Require that residential
projects of six units or more
partiUWte in the California
Energy Commission's New
Solar Homes Partnership,
which provides rebates to
developers of six units or
re who offer solar power
in 50 percent of new units
and is a component
of the California
Solar Initiative, or a
similar program
with solar power
requirements equal
to or greater than
those of the
California Energy
Commission's New
Solar Homes
Partnership.
Electricity - 33% Renewable Portfolio Standard (RPS)
Underthe RPS, certainretail sellersofelec olywererequired to increasethe amountof renewable energy each year byat least 1 percentin orderto reach at least 20 percent by December 30,
2010. The California Air Resources Board (CARE) has now approved an even higher goal of 33 Percent by 2020.
GHG Reductions
Reductions
(MTons)
Residential
14,352
N o n- Residential
17,251
Total
31,603
Note: all Energy and Building reductions are based on the PG &E
2020 GHG Intensity. (i.e., applied RPS then accounted for
GHG Intensity 2020 0.133 NoonsCO2e/nhib additional reductions)
Based on future 2020 emission rates estimated by PG &E using the California Public Utility
Commission GHG Calculator, which provides an independent forecast of PG &E's emission
factors as part of model on how the electricity sector would reduce emissions under AB 32.
These include GHG reductions from emissions sources from the sources (e.g., power plants),
Cap and Trade, and 33% 111
source: Pacific Gas & Electric (PG &E). 2011, April 8. Greenhouse Gas Emission factors Info
Sheet.
hup : / /www.pgexam /ncludes /doo /pdfs/ shared / environment /calculator /pge�hg_emission
hctm info_,heecpdf
Implementat ion: PG &E submits annual report to the CEC regarding compliance with the 33% RPS.
PG &E is required to Participate in the Cap and Trade program being implemented by CARB. The Cap and Trade program
accounts for approximately 85 percent of the total GHG reductions statewide.
PG &E is restricted from constructing new, carbon - intensive plants or enter into new contracts with high-carbon sources of
electricity, pursuant to Senate gill 136812006), which created GHG performance standards for utilities serving California
customers
Electricity & Natural Gas - Title 24 Cycle Updates to the California Building Code
The 2008 Building and Energy Efficiency standards (Title 24, Part 6) are approximately 15 percent more energy efficient than the 2005 Building and Energy Efficiency standards, which were in place
at the time of CARS's Sopping Plan. The California Energy Commission anticipates that future code cycles (2014 and beyond( may require a 30 Percent increase in energy efficiency compared to
the 2008 Building and Energy Efficiency Standards. However, these future cycles are not included in the Adjusted forecast.
Reductions
13% Non - Residential Natural Gas Reduction (2008 Building and Energy Efficiency Standards)
Energy & Green Buildings Measures
10% Residential Natural Gas Reduction (2008 Building and Energy Efficiency Standards)
15% Residential and Non - residential Electricity improvements under the 2008 Building and Energy
Source: Bay Area Air Quality Management DisMR (aAAQMD). 20101Revised May 2011). CEQA Air Quality Guidelines
The Town has adapted the 2000 Building and Energy Standards (Title 24, Part 6) of the Celifomia Building code. Architectural
Plans submitted to the Taw. of Los Gatos, community Development Department, Building Division, are currently reviewed to
Implementation: ensure buildings achieve the existing, adopted standard.
GHG Reductions
Electricity
KWh Reductions
KWh 2020 Total
(MTons)
Residential
238,546
109,226,522
542
Non - Residential
2,511,247
128,771,388
1,409
Total
2,749,793
237,997,910
1,951
GHG Reductions
Natural Gas
Therms Reductions
Therms 2020 Total
(MTons)
Residential
79,680
7,690,234
5,135
Non - Residential
61,852
3,654,502
3,201
Total
141,532
11,344,736
8,336
The Town has adapted the 2000 Building and Energy Standards (Title 24, Part 6) of the Celifomia Building code. Architectural
Plans submitted to the Taw. of Los Gatos, community Development Department, Building Division, are currently reviewed to
Implementation: ensure buildings achieve the existing, adopted standard.
Energy & Green Buildings Measures
Electricity - SMART GRID
The California Public Utilities Commission (cpuc) has initiated a rulemaking R.Wl2-O09 to for California hwestonuwned electric utilities to develop a smarter electric and in the state. Pursuant to
Senate Bill 17. the CPUC developed requirements for a Smart Grid deployment plan. In July 2011, California Utilities filed with the CPUC 10 year Smart Grid Deployment Plans. New Smart Meters
provide real -time electricity use information to consumers.
Reduction in Energy Consumption
Low Nigh %Reduction
Residential 1% 30% 3%
Commercial /Office 1% 30511 3%
source: Padfic Northwest National taboretory. 2010, January. The Smart Grid: An Ertimation of the Energy and CO2 Benefits. hUp.//enewenvironmentpnnl.gov/nem/pdf/PNNL-
19112—Reanknol Final.lodf. Table 3.3 Estimated Direct Impacts of the Conservation Effect of Consumer Information and Feedback systems.
Applied to Existing Residential, Commercial, and Office
kwh MTon
Energy Saving from Residential Smart 2,901,263 386
Energy Saving from Commercial and Office
Smart Meters: 2,786,845 371
Total Smart Meter Reduction: 5,688,108 757
Implementation: PG &E is currently upgrading meters to comply with the CPUC mandates. No Town actions required.
Energy & Green Buildings Measures
Measure GB-3; Allow greater development flexibility and other incentives tog., permdting- related) for LEER Silvercenificatian or equivalent GreenPoint rating, for example, by giving green
projects priority in plan review and processing.
GHG reductions estimates are not quantified for this measure.
The Town of Los Gatos, Community Development Department, Building Division and Planning Division, would review
Implementation: development project applications for priority review and processing.
Measure GB-1: Develop a Green Building Ordinance that requires energy- effelent design, in excess of Title 24 standards, for all new residential and non - residential buidings. When
developing the Ordinance, consider development -level thresholds for when certain requirements are triggered.
e Require 30 pe cent above the 2008 Building and Energy Effidenry standards in Tide 24 to coincide with the Voluntary Tier 2 standards of the California
Green Building Code (CALGreen) (Note: Most residential efficiency standard rebate programs for builders begin at 15 Percent above Title 24 Standards.)
e Encourage the use of cement substitutes and reputed building materials for newconsbvction
Building w /2008 Title
with 30% above Title
30% percent increase in energy efficiency
Natural Gas
24
Kwh from New
(MTons)
Residential
Building w/2008 Title Kwh Reductions with
GHG Reductions
Electricity
24 30% above Title 24
(MTons)
Residential
12,517,762 52,037
7
Non-Residential
22,133,119 1,411,898
188
Total
34,650,881 1,463,935
195
Therms from New Therms Reductions
GHG Intensity NG: 0.0067 Woos CO2e/Therms
•002 intensity based on PG &E's third- party- verified GHG inventory submitted to the California Climate Action Registry (CCAR)6
(2003 -2008) or The Climate Registry (TCR) (2009).
CH4 and N20 intensity based an Table G.3 of the LGOP for residential and non -residential (CH4: 0,005 kg/MMBtu; N20: 0.0001
kg/MMBtu)
Building w /2008 Title
with 30% above Title
GHG Reductions
Natural Gas
24
24
(MTons)
Residential
825,772
192,567
1,284
Non - Residential
635,782
109,739
732
Total
1,461,554
302,306
2,015
GHG Intensity NG: 0.0067 Woos CO2e/Therms
•002 intensity based on PG &E's third- party- verified GHG inventory submitted to the California Climate Action Registry (CCAR)6
(2003 -2008) or The Climate Registry (TCR) (2009).
CH4 and N20 intensity based an Table G.3 of the LGOP for residential and non -residential (CH4: 0,005 kg/MMBtu; N20: 0.0001
kg/MMBtu)
Source: California Air Pollution Control Officer's Association (CAPCOA). 2010, August. Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Measures. Table BE -1.1 and BE-
1.2, Climate Zone 5.
New Development to include as a Mitigation Measure or Project Design Feature in the applicable environmental document
Implementation: pursuant to the Califomis Environmental Quality Act(CEOA).
Architectural Plans submitted to the Town of Los Gatos, Community Development Department, Building Division, would be
reviewed for consistenry with this measure.
Electricity Ratio for 1% over
Natural Gas Ratio for 1% over
Title 24
Tale 24
Residentiil(avg)
0.11
0.88
Based on anticipated unit mix
multi - family
0.12
0.88
8911
single-family
0.0E
0.91
11%
Non - Residential
0.31
0.84
Based on anticipated sgft mix
Commercial
0.26
0.72
44%
Office
036
0.95
55%
Industrial
0.06
BAG
1% based on warehouse
Source: California Air Pollution Control Officer's Association (CAPCOA). 2010, August. Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Measures. Table BE -1.1 and BE-
1.2, Climate Zone 5.
New Development to include as a Mitigation Measure or Project Design Feature in the applicable environmental document
Implementation: pursuant to the Califomis Environmental Quality Act(CEOA).
Architectural Plans submitted to the Town of Los Gatos, Community Development Department, Building Division, would be
reviewed for consistenry with this measure.
Energy & Green Buildings Measures
Measure G6 -2: Require all new and significantly remodeled homes to follow the Town's adopted GreenPomt Rated Building Guidelines. Sigudkanlly remodeled homes Includes remodels of
50 percent or more of me square footage or wall area of the home.
Residential Units
12,130
Source: Based an historic building permits for single - family residential homes in the Town (5- years) provided by the Town.
Permits 4,455 significant Remodels 187
Percent of homes : 4%
Number of home, 2010.2020 Remodeled 8,910
Number of 'Significant Remodels' 374
GrearPoint Homes:
Use 20 Percent less energy per year through lightin& insulation, and heating/ruoling
Use 35 percent less water Per year through high water efficiency appliances and landscapes
Significant remodels, because of the Percentage of square footage remodeled, would improve energy efficiency of older
structures that predate the 2005 Building and Energy Efficiency standards. For a conservative estimate, building remodels are
Assumes: assumed to improve energy efficiency of building energy use by 15 percent (natural gas and electricity). While significant
remodels would likely also improve water efficient, reductions for water use are accounted for in existing Water District
programs.
15% percent increase in energy efficiency
Kwh from existing
Title 24 Kwh from homes that would be
Existing (pre -2005 Significantly Kwh Reductions with GHG Reductions
Electricity Title 24) Renovated 15% improvement (MTons)
Residential 12,056,530 371,735 2,230 0
Therms from existing
Title 24Therms from homes that would be
Existing (pre -2005 Significantly Therms Reductions GHG Reductions
Natural Gas Title 24) Renovated with 15% improvement (MTons)
Residential 6,040,727 186,252 25,423 169
GHG Intensity NG: 0-0067 MTons 002e/Tberms
-0O2 intensity based on PG&E's third - party - verified GHG inventory submitted to the California Climate Attian Registry (CCAR)6
)2003 -2008) or The Climate Registry (TCR) (2001
kg/MM8tu)
Electricity Ratio for 1% over Natural Gas Ratio for 1% over
Title 24 Tile 24
single - family 0.04 0.91
Source: California Air Polluton Control Officers Association (CAPCOA). 2010, August. Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Measures. Table BE -1.1 and BE-
1.2, Climate Zone 5.
For projects subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEOA) include as a Mitigation Measure or Project Design
Implementation: Feature in the applicable environmental document.
Architectural Plans submitted to We Town of Los Gatos, Community Development Department, Building Division, would be
reviewed for consistency with this measure.
Measure 4313-4: Require measures that reduce energy use through solarienentation by taking advantage of shade, prevalling winds, landscapin& and wind screens.
Required for under CALGreen. GHG reductions estimates are not quantified for this measure.
The Town of Los Gatos, Community Development Department, Building Division and Planning Division, would review
Implementation: development project applications consistent with the requirements of the California Green Building Code (rALGreen).
Energy & Green Buildings Measures
Measure GB- 5:Iden1ify and remove regulatory or procedural barriers to implementing green building practices in the Town, by updating codes, guidelines, and zoning.
GHG reductions estimates are not quantified for this measure.
Long -Term. The Town of Los Gatos, Community Development Department, Building Division and Planning Division, would
Implementation: review and make recommendations to the Town regarding building codes, guidelines, and zoning.
Measure GB -6: coordinate with other dual governments, special disMC4, nonprofits, and other public organizations to share resources, achieve economies of wale, and develop green
building policies and pmgnms that are optimized on a regional scale.
GHG reductions estimates are not quantified for this measure.
Implementation: Long- Term. The Town of Los Gatos would coordinate, as applicable, with other agennes for regional planning initiatives.
Energy & Green Buildings Measures
Measure RE-1: In partnership with Pad&Gas and Electric and oral alternative energy companies, develop an Alternative Energy Development Plan that induces townwide measurable
goals and identifies the allowable and appropriate alterrubw energy Win, types within the town, such as solar photovolaic(") on urban residential and commercial roofs. Propose phasing
and timing of alternative energy fatlrM and infrastructure development Provide the development review process list/worksheet to new alternative energy projects and conduct . review of Town
policies and ordinances to address alternative energy production. clearly optimal locations and the best means W avoid noise, aesthetic and other Potential land use compatibility congkts(e.g.,
instilling tacker,, miar PV or angling fixed soh, PV in a manner that reduces glare to surrounding lark uses). Consider Portlier reducing Permitting fees for alternative energy development
Potential square footage of solar panels installed on public properties:
Civic Center -110 E. Main Street o square feet
Public Works -41 Miles Avenue 4,350 square feet
Adult Recreation Center -123 E. Main Street 1,300 square feet
Police Facility - 15900 Los Gatos Boulevard 3,650 square feet
Rest rooms - Beigatos Park, Blossom Hill Park, Oak Meadow Park 301 square feet
Assumes: Solar installed at the Public Works Facility within the next 10 years.
Power Offset
Public Works: 61,922 kwh /year
8 GHG MTons
SolarEstimate 2010: 10 watts per square foot and 5 hours of direct sunlight per day and a 78% energy conversion efficiency.
http: / /wwwsolar-estimate.org/
Long -Term Measure. The Town would coordinate with PG &E to identify existing Town Facilities where alternative energy
Implementation: generation could be used to offset energy demand.
Measure RE -2: Require that resken0al projects of s & units or mare participate in the California Energy Commission's New solar Homes Partnership, which provides rebates to developers of
six units or more who offer solar power in So percent of new units and Is a component of the California solar Initiative, or a similar program with solar Power requirements equal to or greater
than those of the California Energy Commission's Navy solar Homes Partnership.
New Residential Units:
1.423 Multi family units are assumed to be developed at six units or more.
1,600
54ngle- family units are assumed to be, developed on individual parcels and would not trigger this requirement.
Units with solar PV: 712 Assumes SOB. of units with solar PV.
Power associated with Residential Solar Panels: I Power Offset
Residential Solar 4,931 kwh /unit /year 3,508,407 kWh
467 GHG MTons
Source: California Energy Commission (DEC). 2011. Clean Power Estimator. http: / /www.gosolor ldornia.org /tools /cleany wer_estimatocphp. Based on a 3,000 Watt -ac PV system
(residential or 3 kw system) in zip code 95032 (default sire).
New Development to include as a Mitigation Measure or Project Design Feature in the applicable environmental document
Implementation: pursuant to the California Environmental Duality Act ICEOAI.
Architectural Plans submitted to the Town of Los Gatos, Community Development Department, Building Division, would be
reviewed for consistenry, with this measure.
Energy & Green Buildings Measures
Measure RE -3: Require that new or major rehabilitaUpns of commercial, office, or industrial developmentgrester than or equal to 20,000 square feet in size incorporate solaror other
renewable energygeneation W provide 35 percent, more of the project's energy needs. Major rehabilitations are defined as remodeling/addhlons of 20,000 square feet of office /retail
commercial orl0o,o00 square festof Industrial fioor area. Removeregulatoryharmersto Wwr mOngrenewableenergygenemtkn.
Existing Commercial
sgft
4,081,350
Source: Based on historic building permits for non - residential remodels in the Town (5 -years) provided by the Town.
Permits 743 Significant Remodels 34
Percent of Permits 5% square feet remodeled ga%o00 Assumes no industrial remodels(with more soft)
Asmmeso Significant remodels would improve energy efficlenol of older stactoaes that predate the 2005 Building and Energy Effdimc,
st2ards by 15 percent (natural gas and electricity).
15% percent increase in energy efficiency
Kwh from existing non
Title 24 Kwh from residential that would
Existing (pre -2005 be Significantly Kwh Reductions with GHG Reductions
Electricity Title 24) Renovated 15% improvement (MTons)
Non - Residential 72,442,534 12,069,762 496,382 66
Therms from existing
Title 24 Therms from non - residential that
Existing (pre -2005 would be Significantly Therms Reductions GHG Reductions
Title 24) Renovated with 15 %imnrnvPmarst IRAT -11
GHG Intensity NG: 0.0067 MTons CO2eyrherms
•002 intensity based on PG &Ps third- party - verified GHG inventory submitted W the California Climate Action Registry (CCAR)6
QD03 -2008) or The Climate Registry (TCR) (2009).
kg/MMBW)
Development subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) to include as a Mitigation Measure or Project Design
Implementation: feature in the applicable environmental document pursuant.
Architectural Plans submitted to the Town of Los Gatos, Community Development Department, Building Division, would be
reviewed for consistency with this measure.
Electricity Ratiofor1 %over
Natural Gas Radio for 11 Over
TWO 24
Title 24
Non- Resldential
0.27
0J8
BasedonanticipateisgRmia
Commercial
0.26
0.72
4]%
Off
0.36
0.95
40%
Industrial
0.06
0.46
13% based an warehouse
source: California Air Pollution
Control OK efs Association (CAPCOA). 2010, August. Quantifying
Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Measures. Table BE -1.1 and BE-
1.2, Climate Zone S.
Development subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) to include as a Mitigation Measure or Project Design
Implementation: feature in the applicable environmental document pursuant.
Architectural Plans submitted to the Town of Los Gatos, Community Development Department, Building Division, would be
reviewed for consistency with this measure.
Energy & Green Buildings Measures
Measure RE-5: Where feasible, requlre that all new buildings be constructed to allow for the easy, cost- eHedive installation of future solar energy systems. -Solar ready' features should
include: proper solar orientation (i.e., south facing roof area sloped at 20' to 55' from the horizontal); dear access on the south sloped roof (i.e., no chimneys, heating writs, plumbing vents, etc.);
electrical condu3 installed for solar electdc system wining; plumbing installed for solar hot water system; and space provided for a solar hot water storage tank.
Reductions for residential assumed in Measure RE -2
Reductions for non - residential assumed in Measure ME -3
New Development to include as a Mitigation Measure or Project Design Feature in the applicable environmental document
Implementation: pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Ad (CEOA).
Architectural Plans submitted to the Town of Los Gatos, Community Development Department, Building Division, would be
reviewed for consistency with this measure.
Measure RE-6: Work with the ideal Sdwol districts to encourage the use of solar energy WAMS at sdmDl facilities.
GHG reductions estimates are not quantified for this measure.
The Town of Las Gatos, Community Development Department, Building Division and Planning Division, would coordinate with
Implementation: loralschaol districts.
Measure RE-7: support and participate in regional efforts tD study the feasibility and interest in establishing communhydwice aggregation In Los Gatos..
GHG reductions estimates are not quantified for this measure.
Implementation: TheTown of LDS Gatos, Community Services Department, would ensure long -term implementation of this measure.
Measure EC-1: Require new development to use enefgyefRdent appliances that meet ENERGY STAR standards and eneW-offi lent lighting technologies that meet ofinuedl Title 24
standards.
Assumes developers would provide energy-efficient appliances or residents would purchase new appliances, which meet the Title 25 Energy Code.
Percent of Total Eledrkity
Residential
Refrigerators
18%
Clotheswashar
1%
Dishwasher
3%
Sources: Brown, Richard E. and goomey. Jonathan G., 2002, May. Electricity Use in California: Past Trends and Present Usage Patterns. University of California,
Berkeley (UCB). Energy analysis Departments Environmental Energy Technologies Division, Ernest Orlando Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. IBL 41992.
hup; / /enduse.ibl.gov /Projects /CAdata.html.
Energy Star appliances Increased Efficiency
Source: California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA). 2010, August. Quantifying GHG Mitigation Measures. Average based on percentage muld-
family and single -family units anticipated in Climate Zone S.
Ughting (hard -wired interior [6 %) and exterior 133%)1 is 3s% of total commercial energy use (CEC). Hard -wired lighting is regulated under Title 24 and therefore not included in reductions.
ENERGY STAR Appliances:
kwh MTon
Energy Saving from New Residential Units: 68,908 9
New Development to include as a Mitigation Measure or Project Design Feature in the applicable environmental document
Implementation: pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQAI.
Residential(iveragel
Refrigerators
2.95%
Clothes washer
0.09%
Dishwasher
0.12%
Source: California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA). 2010, August. Quantifying GHG Mitigation Measures. Average based on percentage muld-
family and single -family units anticipated in Climate Zone S.
Ughting (hard -wired interior [6 %) and exterior 133%)1 is 3s% of total commercial energy use (CEC). Hard -wired lighting is regulated under Title 24 and therefore not included in reductions.
ENERGY STAR Appliances:
kwh MTon
Energy Saving from New Residential Units: 68,908 9
New Development to include as a Mitigation Measure or Project Design Feature in the applicable environmental document
Implementation: pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQAI.
Energy & Green Buildings Measures
Measure EC 4: Conllnuethe Kill -A -Watt Electsitlty Usage Monitor program, through which residents an check out a device from the library that an be plugged into household electronics
to see how much electricity they recite..
GHG reductions estimates are not quantified for this measure.
Implemenation: The Town of Los Gatos, Community Services Department, would ensure long -term implementation of this measure.
Measure EC-5: Seek funding W implement a low - Income weatheruation program.
GHG reductions estimates are not quantified forth is measure.
The Town Of Los Gatos, Community Development Department, Planning Division, would evaluate funding Opportunities for
Impiementatian: existing residential and nom- residential property owners.
Measure EC-6: Provkle links to and /or contact information on the Town's website for education and outreach by outside organizations that promote quality insulation installation (oil),
which eliminates gaps In buildings.
GHG reductions estimates are not quantified for this measure.
The Town of Los Gatos, Community Development Department, Planning Division, would conduct education and outreach for
Implementation: existing residential and non - residential property owners.
Energy & Green Buildings Measures
Measure EC -2: Partnerwith Pacific Gas & Electric and other appropriate energy providers to promote energy conservation, Including the following:
• Promote the purchase of ENERGY STAR applances.
• Distribute free compact fluorescent light (CFLI bulbs and /or fixtures to community members.
• Offer a halogen torchiere Jump exchange to community members.
• Promote energy eKdrency, audits of existing buildings to check, repair, and readjust heating, ventilation, air conditioning, lighting, water heating equipment, insulation, and weatherbation.
• Partner wins the 60icon Valley Association of Realtors to encourage energy sores to be performed when residential and commercial buildings are sold. Energyaudrtswillindudeinfwmation
regarding the opportunities for energy efficiency Improvements, and will be Presented to the buyer.
• Commercial buildings to be'benrhmarked' using EPA's ENERGY STAR Portfolio Manager Tool, consistent with AB 1103, which requires disciosure of commercial buildings' energy efficiency
rating.
• Promote individualised energy management planning and related services for large energy users.
• Fund and schedule energy efficiency retrofts or 'tune -ups' of existing buildings.
• Pursue incentives and grants for energy conservation.
ENERGY STAR APPLIANCES -EXISTING
Assume a portion of the existing residential uses would purchase new energy-efficient appliances which meet the Title 25 Energy Cade.
Percent of Total Electricity Residential
Refrigerators 18%
Clothes washer 1%
Dishwasher 3%
Sources: Brown, Richard E. and Koomey, Jonathan G., 2002, May. Electricity Use in California: Past Trends and Present Usage Patterns. University of Califomia,
Berkeley IUCBh Energy analysis Department Environmental Energy Technologies Division, Ernest Orlando Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. IBL- 47992.
hup. / /enduse.lbi.g.v /Projects /6 d.t..htmi.
Energy star appliances Increased Efficiency
Residential Increase in
Efficient, (average multi& Average Appliance Life Residential Turnover in the next
single family( Expectancy 10 years
Refrigerators 1.99% 14 Years 70%
Clothes washer o.5W.. 12 years 6096
Dishwasher 0.14% 12 years 6096
Source: California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA). 2010, August- Quantifying GHG Mitigation Measures. Based
on single- family units anticipated in Climate Zone 5 for existing single-family rerk enrial m the Town.
Source: Appliance Life Expectancy. hUp,//www.mmppliance.wm/expenilife-guide/ Based on the Ida expectancy of appliances as
reported in the 23rd annual portrait of the U.S. appliance industry.
ENERGY STAR Appliances:
kwh Won
Energy Saving from Existing Residential Units: 250,054 33
Existing residential property owners would purchase new Energy Star rated appliances that meet the new Title 25 energy
Implementation: standards as appliance reach the end of their useful life. No Action needed.
For monitoring, the Town can coordinate with PG &E who administers rebates for replacement of old inefficient appliances to
identify annual rebates issued for town residents and businesses.
Measure EC -7: compile a list of funding sources that local residents, businesses, or the Town could potentially access to fund energy audits to inform homeowners and businesses of
GHG reductions estimates are not quantified for this measure.
The Town of Los Gatos, Community Development Department, Planning Division, would conduct compile a list of funding
Implementation: sources for existing residential and non- residential propnviceners.
Energy & Green Buildings Measures
Measure EC -8: Continue participation in the Ullfom.1`1 Tprogram, which provides innovative, loco - interest financing for energy effdenry projects for sending and new development.
New Development would be able to participate in this program. The town currently does not track permits that are funded using this
program. Therefore, no reductions are accounted for.
The Town of Los Gatos, Community Development Departments Building Division, would monitor building permits pulled for
Implementation: existing properties that implement energy- efrsienry upgrades, including upgrades using the CalifornmFIRST funds.
Measure EC-9: Develop a `heat island" mitigation plan that includes guidelines for== roofs, cad pavements, and stnitegually placed shade trees. Amend the applicable Design Guidelines
to integrate the guidelines. Evaluate and balance tradeof a between solaracceu and landscape tree shading in Design Guidelines.
GHG reductions estimates are not quantified for this measure.
The Town of Los Gatos, Community Development Department, Building Division and Planning Division, would integrate
requirements for reducing building heating/cooling requirements within applicable Design Guidelines, consistent with the
Implementation: requirements of the California Green Building Code (CALGreen).
Measure EC-10: Require all new development and major rehabilitation (i.e., additions or remodel, of 10,000 square feetof office /retail commercial or 100,000 square feet of industrial floor
area) projects to incorporate any combination ache following strategies to reduca heatgain for 50 percent of the non -roof impervious site landscape, which includes roads, sidewalks,
courtyards, parking lots, and driveways: shaded within five years of oodpancy; paving materialswith a Solar Reflectance Index (SRI) of at kart 29; open grid pavementsystem; and parking spaces
underground, under clerk, under roof, or under a building. Anyroof used to shade or cover parking must have an SRI of at kart 29.
New development must comply with Title 24 and the California Green Building Code. No additional reductions accounted for.
Existing Non - Residential energy reductions accounted for in RE -3. No additional reductions accounted for.
New Development to include as a Mitigation Measure or Project Design Feature in the applicable environmental document
Implementation: pursuant to the California Environmental quality Ad(CEDA).
Architectural Plans submittetl to the Taw. of Los Genie, Community Development Department, Building Division, would be
reviewed for consistent, with this measure and existing requirements under the 3008 Building and Energy Efficiency
Standards (Title 24).
Energy & Green Buildings Measures
Measure EC -3: Require outdoor lighting fixtures to be energy - efficient. Require parking lot light futures and light fistues an buildings to be on full cutoHfiatures, except emergency exit or
safety fightm& and all Permanently installed exterior lighting shall be controlled by either a photocell or an astronomical time switch. Prohibit continuous all night outdoor lighting in construction
sites unlessrequired /orsecurhy reasons. Revue the Town Code to include these requirements.
Non - Residential Exterior Lighting: 6% of Total Energy Use
Sources: Brown, Richard E. and Koomey, Jonathan G.. 2002, May. Electricity Use in CaItfomia: Past Trends and Present Usage Patterns. University of Caldomia,
Berkeley (UB), Energy analysis Department, Envimnmental Energy Technologies Division, Ernest Orlando Lawrence Berkeley National tabaratory. IBL 47992.
Energy - Efficient exterior lighting is assumed to be LED technology
Efficiency of LED vs. High Pressure Sodium Lighting
Annual Energy saving (KWh) Per
Average Power(Watta) Power Saving (Watts) Luminaires Wasson (hours) Annual Hours
High Pressure sodium Luminaires
LED Laminate
121
72.7 43
Percent Retluction 36%
30,000 4,100
178
Turnover (years) 7.3 10146 in to years
Source: U.S. Department of Energy (DOEI. 2008, January. Final Report Prepared in Support of the U.S. WE Solid -state Ughting Technology Demonstration Gateway Program and PG &E Emerging
Technologies Program. Prepared by Energy Solutions.
NON - RESIDENTIAL EXTERIOR LIGHT REPLACEMENT
kwh MTon
Energy Saving from Non- Residential Lighting 2,117,109 282
Implementation: The Townoftos Gatos would seek to identify the use ofenergy efficient outdoor lighting in the Mundpal Cade.
Ughting plans submitted to the Town of Las Gatos, Community Development Department, Building, or Parks and Public
Works Department, would need identify the use of energy- efficient lighting.
New Development to Include as a Mitigation Measure or Project Design Feature in the applicable environmental document
pursuant to the Czlifomia Environmental Quality Act (CEOA).
Measure EC -11: Encourage the installation of programmable thermostats in existing mskermal and commercial buildings.
GHG reductions estimates are not quantified for this measure.
The Town of Los Gatos, Community Development Department, Building Division and Planning Division, would require
Implementation: replacement of thermostats for permits requiring heating/ cooling system renovations, consistent with the Title 24
Measure EC -12: Forms vWunteercommittee of local design professionals to create a brochure to educate creens on how to aaveenergy through design.
GHG reductions estimates are not quantified for this measure.
The Town of Los Gatos, Community Development Department, Planning Division, would spearhead creation of a volunteer
Implementation: committee to create a brochure to educate carats an energy saving Opportunities.
Measure CA-1: Develop ask implement an outreach plan to engage local businesses in climate change reduction programs.
GHG reductions estimates are not quantified for this measure.
The Town of Los Gatos, Community Development Department. Planning Division, would develop and implement an outreach
Implementation: plan to engage the business community in GHG reduction programs.
California Electricity Consumption by End Use
Source: Brown, Richard E. and Koomey, Jonathan G., 2082, May. Electricity Use in California: Post Trends and Present Usage Patterns. University of California,
Berkeley (UCB), Energy analysis Department, Environmental Energy Technologies Division, Ernest Orlando Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. IBL- 47992.
http: / /enduse.ibl.gov /Projects /CAdata.html
Annual Energy %
Non -Title
Annual Energy TWh
Total
%of Sector
24
Title 24
Commercial
Air Conditioning
13.8
5%
15%
15%
Interior Lighting
30.3
12%
34%
34%
Other
19.9
8%
22%
22 ^%
Ventilation
9.1
4%
10%
10%
Refrigeration
6.5
3%
7%
7%
Office Equipment
1.6
1%
2%
2%
Domestic Hot Water
0.5
0%
1%
1%
Exterior Lighting
5.0
2%
6%
6%
Cooking
0.6
0%
1%
1%
Space Heating
2.1
1%
2%
2%
Total Commercial
89.5
36%
100%
32%
68%
Residential
Air Conditioning
4.8
2%
6%
6%
Miscellaneous
24.6
10%
33%
33%
Refrigerator
13.7
5%
18%
18%
Cooking
3.6
1%
5%
5%
Dryer
5.7
2%
8%
8%
Pools & Spas
4.1
2%
5%
5%
Domestic Hot Water
4.2
2%
6%
6%
Television
3.4
1%
5%
5%
Freezer
2.5
1%
3%
3%
Dishwasher
2.0
1%
3%
3%
Waterbed Heater
2.1
1%
3%
3%
Clothes Washer
0.7
0%
1%
1%
Space Heating
0.4
2%
1%
1%
Total Residential
75.4
30%
100%
83%
12%
Industrial
Assembly
33
13%
62%
62%
Process
14
6%
26%
26%
Other
6.1
2%
11%
11%
Total Industrial
53.5
21%
100%
99%
Agricultural
Total Industrial
17.8
7%
100%
100%
Transport & Street Lighting
Total Transport & Lighting
15.3
6%
100%
100%
Total Statewide
251.6
100%
California Natural Gas Use by End Use
Source: California Energy Commission.Residential End Use Survey. http:// energyalmanac.ca.gov /naturalgas /residential use.html
Annual Energy %
Residential Total
Non -Title 24
Title 24
Water Heating 44%
44%
Space Heating 44%
44%
Pools, Spas, Misc. 2%
2%
Clothes Dryers 3%
3%
Cooking 7%
7%
Total 100%
1 12%
1 88%
Source: California Energy Commission. 2006, March. California Commercial End -Use Survey. Prepared by Itron. CEC- 400 -2006-
005. http:/ /www.energy.ca.gov /2006publicat ions /CEC -400- 2006- 005 /CEC- 400 - 2006- 005.PDF
Annual Energy %
Commercial Total
Non -Title 24
Title 24
Water Heating 31.8%
32%
Heating 36.4%
36%
Cooling 1.5%
2%
Process 5.9%
6%
Miscellaneous 1.8%
2%
Cooking 22.6%
23%
Total 100%
32%
68%
Water and Wastewater
Measures
Wastewater
-
Water
Wastewater
GHG Indirect
Existing
Existing
(Electricity)
GHG Indirect
(Electricity)
GHG Direct
GHG Indirect
Gallons /Day
MTons
(Electricity)
MTons
MTons
(Electricity)
GHG Direct
1,767
Gallons /Day
MTons
304
Gallons /Day
MTons
MTons
Residential
4,852,000
1,624
90
Residential
1,467,730
268
863
Non - Residential
361,687
121
1,268
Non - Residential
390,337
71
262
Total
5,213,687
1,745
Total
1,858,067
339
1,125
Water
Wastewater
New
GHG Indirect
GHG Indirect
(Electricity)
(Electricity)
GHG Direct
Gallons /Day
MTons
Gallons /Day
MTons
MTons
Residential
426,550
143
Residential
193,600
36
114
Non- Residential
71,674
24
Non - Residential
104,340
19
29
Water
Total
Wastewater
GHG Indirect
GHG Indirect
(Electricity)
(Electricity)
GHG Direct
Gallons /Day
MTons
Gallons /Day
MTons
MTons
Residential
5,278,550
1,767
Residential
1,661,330
304
977
Non - Residential
433,361
145
Non - Residential
494,677
90
291
Total
1 5,711,911
1,912
Total
2,156,007
394
1,268
Water/ Wastewater -33% Renewable Portfolio Standard
under the Fps, certain retell sellers of eiectiany were required to mvease the amount of renewable energy each veer by It lean 1 recent In order to,eam at sawn percent by oecemba. 3o. loon
CAflOM1asnow approved an even future goal of 33 percent by Marc
GHG Intensity 0.133 Minns CO2e /MWh
Percent
GHG Reductions Reduction from
870 53%
Wastewater
GHG Reductions Percent Reduction
(MTons) from RAU
150 9%
Based can Nmre Mao emission rates surrounded by l o &E USmg the California wbrc utaay commission GIG OlcuNl «, which connotes an independent
forecast of M &FS emission Bros as an of a model on how the eleclmry sector would rMUre emissions under Ads 3M. these ncWtle GXG
redustions from emissions :Dorm ham the sources (I power plane. Op and Trade, and 33% had.
source: paw Gas &Ekabk 1pGCn. In, 1. ApM& GremM1wse Gas Emioion now, 11 SM1ret.
hnp9Nww.pge.wmfindudn /do pds/ shared /-Amnon Valmlator /pge,hg .iuion fMar Fb Mdetpol
gnpkmentahon: Marc Submits annual lop it to Me CEbefunding mmpliana with the 33 %M.
pG &E is required to partitlpate in the Cap and Trade prepare being implemented b1.M. Tpn 6p and Trade p roam armunds for
appravnate Mperrentoft ewtal GHGredud'wnsstatewide.
M&EistnWdedfromwnsuunmgnm, rban- intensive plants or emerinto new crones with hansuarban sources ofekdrkity pursuant
to Senate 011111s. 11.1, which created GHG pwerriann, standards for unfire, serving Cut.fnmie customers
Measure WV-3: had ube new dmelopment to use native plants or other approprute non invasive plants that are drought tolerant gstuudge the use of hardscap r runpiesuncou, sciansdays m
place of water consumpMe landscaping.
GHG reductions estimates are not quantified for this measure.
Me Town of Lars Caton, community recewpmmt cepaNnent, phnnmg Diversion and Budding Drrindn, would raqube that new development
use drought- tokraat hard—hit, sons4tent wiN me requirement; of the water E fitlent to nducape oN mane (Town Codal. anplkants for
bemtiu would be ,mewed by Me Town of Loy Gatos, Community Development pewdment, Ntgding Ixaisun for wmstenpwits has
Mplementation: measure.
New Deeelapment to cancer, as a Mitgaton Measure or Proied MwWh Feature an Me applicable environmental daument pursuant to the
California EnwonmentaD Quality Air (CEM).
Water and Wastewater Measures
Measure will papal and updau Me Towns wrom Efficient bndsape omnana wed mumnied oansereuan emamma and imam —mr..s residential ruupnen.
GHG reductions estimates are not quantified for this measure.
The Tna'n of Gatos, Community Derempment Department, planning oisisun and guuding Manor, wautl piratically update me water
Implementat Or Mccant landscape 0minana Town Code) pursuant to statewide mandates, Including wasembns Me 1881,
Measure WW- 1: Fmhy,w dembpment, rMuire all water use and efficiency measur¢peather as eoluntary m Me California Green guiding standards Cade, and comfort mane stmgentomptt
California Green Braiding standards Code reaueementsmode: l) reduce indoor potable water use by 20 percent after mewing the Energy, sofgAet of 1992 Nature performance requirements. aM 2)
reduccom our potable water May by 50perant from a agbrated met summer income case, for eomple, through argabon eficimcy,aanl species,a[ysledwastrxater, and captured rainwater.
Estabch Town nermusherments fin duoetbna, prourcts of,prourso,watering Oming,w erneffi[ieni irrleation allotment aster eR[ient homes. and oHSeMng demandsa that Mere 4 era net uaeasein
Imported water me. Iodide dear parameters for mtryating water rvalpn infrasuucture and formulated. including low-farm talent, and bwnaw slaccomm dads. M appropriate, partner with
btal water mnurvrtion mmpanlnm %a development and lmpkmennNon of M. measure.
The Cafiforma Commitment of Water Resources adopted a plan to reduce per capita water use by 20 percent by 2020 in accordance with the roal2WO20 Wale, Conservation pan New
development 6,eyuved to comply with the new file 24 California Green Braiding Cade IGCGteen)water of smouny proseaims that mandate an improvement oser existing standing and Yngation
water effitlenq, Thin efficiency mnnponds vnN Me 2MB20 goal m reduce pergmGa water use bit 20 perrent
W corteate to a 20 percent decrease in waslewaler generation.
T,NMMI, D6rnbuGM, and Wall...' Treatment
San fanebeo gay Area AY Basin /sane Caum Cou cry
1 wh /mgallons
water 3,500
wanewater 1,911
Source: south Wan AM (Malay w— gemen t Commit (donna m, 2011. California fmissbm common Bbdel Navigational
User's G ad! e. Appends D. Default Pala Tabb. Table 93 water and wastewater uMriay instant. Dab b based on the
value for Northern California reported in Me CalAwnu Energy, Wmmusion 2PL1s pepan'eefinNg estimates of Water-
bilabial Energy Use in Cautious..
the Town has adopted ulGreen and a Unit sape water Number, orduame. landscape arms automated lama Town of Gatos,
hapaimought.: Comm anior DeMopment Department eadmg fivbis are tucently reviewed No ensure but Wings ach ieve the eaispncaeapted standard.
20% Decrease
20% Decrease GHG
NEW
Gallons /Day
from Energy
Residential Water
85,310
14
Non - Residential Water
14,335
2
Total
99,645
17
20% Decrease
20% Decrease GHG
20% Decrease GHG
NEW
Gallons /Day
from Energy
from Fugitive
Residential Wastewater
193,600
18
23
Non - Residential Wastewater
104,340
10
6
Total
297,940
28
29
Total GHG Reduction from Water and Wastewater for New Development:
73 MTons
the Town has adopted ulGreen and a Unit sape water Number, orduame. landscape arms automated lama Town of Gatos,
hapaimought.: Comm anior DeMopment Department eadmg fivbis are tucently reviewed No ensure but Wings ach ieve the eaispncaeapted standard.
Water and Wastewater Measures
Me a sure dita: Adapt a water efficiency on ammo rhearequires nwhades as a transition of ssumg permits far renovations or add awns. Wod was local wale, atmaor sto aaharm
consistent standards and imew, and apprenl procedures for impkmentatien.
Reductions from this measure from existing residential and non - residential consumers are capped at the 20 percent per capita goal included in
Measure WW -5.
Nmaesebpmentbintldeasa MRl to nMeasureppmj design Featureintheappli bkenwonmentaldmumentpunuanttothe
Implementation: Uldarnm Envrtonmentdiatim WAttlCE".
Applicants Far permit would be reWwed by the Town of bs Galas, community Oeselupment Depatlment, amusing Oiwgn be mnsntency
with the measure.
Measure WW -2b: Work with the San lose Water company lslWq and wets Clara Val" Water D'¢mat zCNJIA to adopt water conservation pros, curb as tiered rate structures, m encourage
eRw'entwateruse A spa, totthlsmeasure ,lhewakralsmctswouMwndudl eloC mg:
• Pavtle mhesin earth ba(mE act accmerswilb water use budgets sM1Owing the relationship between the budget and Mualcrosumption_
• Encourage wholesale water matters to provide financial incentives m their lend! water agency customers that encourage water reaserva0on efforts-
• Work with SAVCto meter with commodity, rates for all new conneslkm, and retrofit eating connections.
• To M1Np monitor landscaping water.11 creme acm eft wbM1 dedicanO i iprec on mete¢, or develop and implement a xrategy prgeYmg and mn4eting binge landscape water use surnyzb
(ommerdatmEUmrlaVinsOtu! nala¢wnu wM mum- uumete!s-
"a caifomla Department of Witter gesources adopted a plan by reduce per arre water use by to percent by Notate accordance with Me final2MQO2a Water comemtion plan. In wept ence
with this new nationwide Val, water purnyori in cinemas haw updated than 2010 urban Water Management pion Maybe) to identify the per capita goals for 2020 and ways t0 reduce exong
water use by20 percent peraaplm through pricingsoate®es, low- PowfiatuR(rr gation repMCemen[programs, and otheramsene ion programs
20% Decrease 20% Decrease GHG
Existing Gallons /Day from Energy
Residential Water 970,400 165
Non - Residential Water 72,337 12
Total 1,042,737 177
20% Decrease 20% Decrease GHG 20% Decrease GHG
Existing Gallons /Day from Energy from Fugitive
Residential Wastewater 293,546 27 173
Non - Residential Wastewater 78,067 7 52
Total 371,613 34 225
Total GHG Reduction from Water and Wastewater for New Development: 437 MTOns
knpkmmkum: meTOwnwoula coordinate whir theses'etOlmpkmmt losing and owonawataraonsarvatim warty es.
Appliance for permiuwould be reriewm bythe Town orlos4atm, community cewbpment parameter,&difir. oivubn cormntMe,
with current water conservation strategies.
Measure Willi he cogabommose wah eHOns by 11111 and sCV WO, promote water audit programs Nat offer Gee water audits to uw& famip, maitiAamtp large landwpe accounts, and
commetnal customers. collaborate with purverms to enam mnarvaon programs for commercial, maumrbl, and institutional ICIp accounts and create programs to mated uttrabwllesh tolets In
bciame
Reductions from this measure from existing residential and non - residential consumers are capped at the 20 percent per capita goal included in
Measure WW-5. No additional GHG reductions are quantified for this measure.
Lnplarmntation: TheTOwn wood c oaminate with the rove and I.. to offer bee wall, a udlts and programs b, mw -now tame :.
Measure WW-6: Adopt a recidenba,anwater ro14e6on poNor and update the zones code as needed to suppo,t germimng was regulation at reagdenual amwner systems.
Reductions from this measure from existing residential and non - residential consumers are capped at the 20 percent per capita goal included in
Measure P V -5. No additional GHG reductions are quantified for this measure.
Appnanb bar permits would be awwm by Me Town or far Gatos, community oewbpmeM reprobation, heading Ols%kn for ponsistenay
unplememiumn: with Aie measure.
Waste Disposal Measures
Waste
-
- Fxuting
Residential
Non - Residential
31,597 10,344
3,443 1,127
21,359
2,327
Tons /Day
GHG MTons
Diverted Tons /Day
Total
Residential
27,915
9,148
18,870
46,785
Non - Residential
2,796
916
1,890
4,686
Total
30,711
10,064
20,760
51,471
Waste
2020
Tons /Day GHG MTans Diverted Tons /Day
Total
Residential
Non - Residential
31,597 10,344
3,443 1,127
21,359
2,327
52,956
5,770
Total
35,040 11,471
23,686
58,726
Increase
4,329 1.407
Average Diversion Rate
OIPeMkareuge tllvenon nb lw LOS Wtoi l$tllgb $D]6p nol ,eponM aflw 3CO)t 60%
3IX0 53X
2.t 48%
p2 52%
.o 5316
2WC 56%
2. 8%
W 65%
5Ow[e: CaIPeMIe. Cau nLSwiae, Pegionu'itle,ana IUwe de lw...I.n nive,pO n /oisPo`a�P,Og [ess Pe po,l
atl p: / /xvw.cal,e[v[kw gov /WCenlral /Pepons /iuriW fiction /E rvenion Oispo vlas p[
Waste Disposal Measures
Existing Waste Reduction, Reuse, and Recycling Programs
rise knowing measures would wpport The same goals so that the roan a mnsnemL with A 1 cercent smemou urger by 1.0,
Measure SW -1: Allow Me eaistwg 1— mrsmon and eemmition aldwam. 1. serum -1 best Sesaram dbemmn R.a.... or ms MA,an w., a gam,o mwaen_.A ham mspasal.
Measure SW -2: Reruns, aA new and sigolsgnmreeeueapmanWremwen steaming murcHamip developments to proeae recycling areas for Mae resdenu withal Amm, ,am areas . signs are t
rMevebpment, and mo odeb i,Maae ma race that add or change so omens or male of Me Amara, famage or wan area.
Measure SW -3: encourage the use of uNaged and mayded.ehoom maemk one other matbmh that haw bay preduchon energy scroll for budding matemh, mm surfaces, and no-nam m ng. �d —Ri
urting etmmw[tim mamrylsbolry. as kasible. Require
Measure SW-4: WgrtwiM lablicand private wane M,w,,mA,, m keep wad andgmen wane wmfundhna
Measure SW -5: WorkwiM public andprreatewane diwosal eminesw arwajace regaeg welcomassurr
Measure SW-6: continue to provlderecyclin, mntamerem m. onwmown met.
Measure SW -7: Errand sawaronat Probi maw redeems aball"Arl mcycbmg ramposung, waste mereff, and term wane arst .
Measure SW -8: Assam anoreimnam ban me uw of ganw barsn ms Gatos.
Measure SW -9: olvwwppolitles. examines. and deer, guidelines MasmcacnRMe pubs one prince Puchoar aM Me ordurame one nondurable stems. meadmgeuder craterels. made nom cled
mterwb or «neyame rear rces.
Measure SW -10: Am maven Me TS person wanemwman I.M established by AB3ay
Measure P -1: heyewp perbtles, incentives, AM dedgn guidelines Met encourage Me Polk AM private Purchase and use mdunble and nondurable stems, Annular, bWMmg material; made from rexyckd
math harrener/ameremurt .
gaud he his'oi al treMs in well.cina al mMacton, aerecerted by OMNeWd., forthe 1-yal Los Gat..
Disposal Yearl Solid Warts, Oisoosal Auwmariva tax „rn.,e. ._._, r___
28,075
14,820
42,895
24,701
7,087
31,788
21,916
9,769
31,685
21,382
7,279
28,661
18,411
9,513
27,924
Urfomla RWnment of Resources ResynNg.rd Messer, jCalResyclel. gleeful RepeningsMem. lunudnIDn p,,,AI bArar v, Lat Gat.,N ,,,M
ma'eealiuud wrNhmative InrA—Adone Cover lad lm AM.M -ever, Air mammals are slimboul under Me Public Resuurces'Me Sttawn 417.131, resydr,
eMa,al one a,.. ao-uhrm...,.,�.a.........,�.._._ ...... ... ....
Percent Reduction
2006-2007
-0.3% g.Pmmr I[gaauon
2007 -2008 -9.5% Aeducu— senteneg Anountu +rH'
2008 -2009 -2.6% r =roe
2009 -2010 -7.1% 1=r . in years Now mom NNl
Average% Reduction Per Year 4,9%
Auumbh 1939 Mg 9391, Me Omomb Inl,,AlM Waste Management Alf al Pgrs. requires juntltawns No dben so percenl of vane horn lance, In Ertl, the Gowmer
armed Asse dy, .11 .1 (PUB 3611eapaMing thewaste ram,lon garkby ensuring the state N dwerong Es P-mm of municipal wild waste.A. Nl itlendfies, Agall of Me Rah
that net less than ESPercent.f.1A wa#egenenlN be wurrered.M, regtlM, orrpmp.IM by the yearN c.
The ma cling conwmM* assu me A gills wane dive/sion n'A lapproaim A NN ] percent immarel bas. on hmpm hands in wall. dmorm,I in Me Town.
radennentanom useren -Aftos Gaaoswoule mntinue'o implement ousting wash /.union pwerams_
TheTown Las Gat. costM stdtto adopta[oni'/uctian and Oemolilian Mbris Ortliname witha$o ce /cpmLwaste
tliveROngoaL
New Development would he review.byMeTCem ofteetads Community Development uepanmen ,Planning
Drvison, for wnusmnq Mth Measure SW -E and current sequbements of GLGrs, which rryuhe muld,wi,
re,aemial aM mmmercm /mrnng.
The Wpq Valley Splitl Wai,p Managemen[AUU,omybann. singleusppwnic Eags stn rebmary E, Ng]. The rce,
ofta bags am owns —' Wew,ValkySymse, hManagementot Gatmic.MMII months, ban. free
reusable bagsaw given away m MemmmuniN every April tlurNg Me Im Gat..eau.wlmon,h.
Transportation Measures
Transportation Existing
Daily VMT GHG MTons
Total 1,495,910 348,150
Transportation I MT Existing
Daily V GHG MTons
Total 269,460 - 57,970
Reductions are based on improvements as vehicle fleets turnover, based on EMFAC2011
Transportation
Total
Total
VMT GHG Worts
;.370 290,180
State and Federal Fuel Efficiency Improvements + Low Carbon Fuel Standard (LCFS)
The Federal Government has adopted and has! mplemented improved Federal Corporate Economy Fuel Efficiency (CAFE) Standards for vehicles
that correspond with the California Assembly Bill 1493 (AB 1493) Pavley I Fuel Efficiency Standards. In addition, the State of California has
adopted the Low Carbon Fuel Standard (LCFS). In January 2012, the California Air Resources Board (CARB) adopted the Advanced Clean Car
Program which implements the Pavley 11 Fuel Efficiency Standards and projects that by 2025, one in every seven new cars sold will be electric
vehicles (PHEV or PEV). However, the Pavley II Advanced Clean Car Program is not included in the transportation emissions reductions and
therefore reductions are conservative.
Based on EMFAC2011. On December 29, 2011 the U.S. District Court issued a preliminary injunction on the California Air Resources Board
(CARB) from enforcing the LCFS during litigation. However, CARB will continue to hold stakeholder meetings and rulemaking processing.
Transportation
Total
GHG Reductions
Total
Daily VMT GHG MTons
1,765,370 222,060
Based on EMFAC2011 Fleet Distribution and emission rates with Pavley+ LCFS.
Reduction Measures - Total Local Reduction Measures (Caps maximums for overlapping categories)
VMT Reduction provided by Fehr & Peers
Year Dan, VMT Annual VMT
Veh
Percent of VMT
NOz
N2O
CO2
CO2e
CO2W /Pavley
CCO2ewl Pavley+
All Other Buses
0.1%
0.0
0.0
6
6
LCF
LCFS
LOA
55.2%
0.5
0.0
1,803
1,808
6
1,245
6
1,250
1171-7
5.9-A
0.1
0.0
221
223
163
164
LOT2
16.5%
0.3
0.0
822
824
623
626
LHO1
2.9-A
0.4
0.0
244
248
219
224
LHD2
0.4%
0.1
0.0
31
32
28
29
MCV
0.6%
0.2
0.0
23
24
20
22
MDV
12.3%
0.4
0.0
693
697
548
551
MH
0.2%
0.1
0.0
14
15
13
14
Motor Coach
0.1%
0.0
0.0
10
0
OBUS
0.1%
0.0
0,0
4
5
PTO
0.1%
0.0
0.0
11
11
4 4
10
4 4
10
SBUS
0.1%
0.0
0.0
6
6
5
T6 Ag
0.0%
0.0
0.0
1
1
1
6
T6 CARP heavy
0.01/6
0.0
0.0
0
0
1
T6 CARP small
0.0%
0.0
0.0
0
0
0
0
T6 instate construction heavy
0.0%
0.0
0.0
3
3
0
0
T6 instate construction small
0.1%
0.0
0.0
9
9
3
3
T6 instate heavy
0.2%
0.1
0.0
27
28
8
25
8
T6 instate small
0.7%
0.1
0.0
77
78
69
25
T6 OOS heavy
0.0%
0.0
0.0
0
0
70
T6 OOS small
0.0%
0.0
0.0
0
0
0
0
T6 public
0.0%
0.0
0.0
3
4
0
0
T6 utility
0.0%
0.0
0.0
1
1
3
3
T6TS
0.2%
0.0
0.0
12
12
0
11
1
11
T7 Ag
0.01/6
0.0
0.0
4
4
4
T7 CARP
0.4%
0.1
0.0
64
65
56
4
59
T7 CARP construction
0.0%
0.0
0.0
4
4
T7 NNOOS
0.4%
0.1
0.0
73
74
q
66
4
66
T7 NOOS
0.1%
0.0
0.0
24
24
21
22
T7 other port
0.016
0.0
0.0
6
6
6
T7 POAK
0.2%
0.2
0.0
34
35
30
6
32
T7 POLA
0.0%
0.0
0.0
0
0
0
T7 public
0.01/6
0.0
0.0
4
4
0
T7 Single
0.256
0.1
0.0
38
39
4
34
4
35
T7 single construction
0.1%
0.0
0.0
10
10
T7SWCV
0.1%
0.0
0.0
10
11
9
9
9
T7 tractor
0.7%
0.3
0.0
112
115
101
10
104
T7 tractor construction
0.0%
0.0
0.0
8
8
T7 Wilily
0.0%
0.0
0.0
1
1
7
7
T71S
0.0%
0.0
0.0
2
2
1
2
1
UBUS
0.1%
0.2
0.0
29
31
26
2
28
TOTAL
100.0%
4
0
4,444
4,479
0 3,393
3,428
NW emissionswereealculaled using an off-model sounded, pndided by CARa in AB32Tevhnual APpendtres. Theart- matlelaelustme mus esaImearremssioncortela0NN2owMWO (Wo=
6A167 a 0.0318 x W4
Daly vehickas ales traveled (VMT) munptied ny 347 daywl.r to account for reduced traffic on weekends add neldays. This assumption is censstent win the CaldomM Air Reseumes Bearers G B
methodelrey wlhin the C14nate Change serving Plan Measure DO[umenlanon suy lement ( )
Reduction Measures - Trip Reduction Strategies Combined
VMT Reduction provided by Fehr & Peers
N20 emissions were calculated using an off -model adjustment pmalded by CANS in AS 32 Technical Ap,mfirks. Tire o0.model adjustment uses a honer regression remaining N20 with NOx (N20 =
Daily whices miles n2veled (VMT) mulliyaied by 347 daysgear to acod,vt for reduced traffic on weekends and boGdays. This assumpton is consistent with the Calilomie Air Resources Board's (CARS)
methodarM wines the Ctimate Change sector, Plan Measure nomenu eaten Supplement.
Year
Dally VMT
AnnuaaVMT
2020
T.872
2,731 594
CO2w/Pavley+
CO2e cal Pavley+
Veh
Percent of VMT
NOx
N20
CO2
CO2e
LGF
LCFS
AN Other Buses
0.1%
0.0
0.0
2
2
2
2
LOA
55.2%
0.1
(10
521
522
360
361
LDT1
5.9%
0.0
0.0
64
64
47
47
LOT2
18.5%
0.1
0.0
237
238
180
181
LHD1
2.9%
0.1
0.0
70
72
63
65
LHD2
0.4%
0.0
0.0
9
9
8
8
MCY
0.6%
0.0
00
7
7
6
6
MDV
12.3%
0.1
0.0
200
201
158
159
MH
0.2%
0.0
0.0
4
4
4
4
Motor Coach
0.1%
0.0
0.0
3
3
3
3
OBUS
0.1%
0.0
0.0
1
1
1
1
PTO
0.1%
0.0
0.0
3
3
3
3
SBUS
0.1%
0.0
0.0
2
2
2
2
T6 Ag
0.0%
0.0
0.0
0
0
0
0
T6 CAIRP heavy
0.0%
0.0
0.0
0
0
0
0
T6 CAIRP small
0.0°/
0.0
0.0
0
0
0
0
T6 instate construction heavy
0. WA
0.0
0.0
1
1
1
1
T6 instate construction small
0.1 %
0.0
0.0
2
3
2
2
T6 instate heavy
0.2%
0.0
0.0
8
8
7
7
T6 instate small
01%
0.0
0.0
22
22
20
20
T6 COS heavy
0.01A
0.0
0.0
0
0
0
0
T6 OOS small
0.0%
0.0
0.0
0
0
0
0
T6 public
0.0%
0.0
0.0
1
1
1
1
T6 Wilily
OA%
0.0
0.0
0
0
0
0
TISTS
0.2%
0.0
0.0
3
4
3
3
T7 Ag
0.0%
0.0
00
1
1
1
1
T7 CAIRP
0.49%
0.0
0.0
19
19
17
17
T7 CAIRP construction
0.0%
0.0
O0
1
1
1
1
T7NNOOS
0.4%
0.0
0.0
21
21
19
19
T7NOOS
0.1%
0.0
0.0
7
7
6
6
T7 other Pon
0.0%
0.0
0.0
2
2
2
2
T7POAK
0.2%
00
0.0
10
10
9
9
T7 POLA
0. WA
00
0.0
0
0
0
0
T7 public
0.0%
0.0
0.0
1
1
1
1
T7 Single
01%
0.0
0.0
11
11
10
10
T7 single construction
01%
0.0
0.0
3
3
3
3
T7SWCV
0.1%
0.0
0.0
3
3
3
3
T7 tractor
0.7%
0.1
0.0
32
33
29
30
T7 tractor construction
00%
0.0
0.0
2
2
2
2
T7 utility
0.0%
0.0
0.0
0
0
0
0
WIS
0.094
0.0
0.0
1
1
0
1
UBUS
0.1%
0.1
00
8
9
8
8
TOTAL
100.0%
1
0
1,284
1,294
0 980
990
N20 emissions were calculated using an off -model adjustment pmalded by CANS in AS 32 Technical Ap,mfirks. Tire o0.model adjustment uses a honer regression remaining N20 with NOx (N20 =
Daily whices miles n2veled (VMT) mulliyaied by 347 daysgear to acod,vt for reduced traffic on weekends and boGdays. This assumpton is consistent with the Calilomie Air Resources Board's (CARS)
methodarM wines the Ctimate Change sector, Plan Measure nomenu eaten Supplement.
Reduction Measures: Transit System Improvements - Network Expansion
VMT Reduction provided by Fehr & Peers
Veh
Percent of VMT
NOx
N2O
CO2
CO2e
CO2wlPavley *
CO2e col Pavley i
AA Other Buses
0.7%
0.00
0.00
0
0
LCF
0
0 L
0
LOA
55.2%
0.02
0.00
61
62
42
43
LOTT
5.9%
0.00
0.00
8
8
6
6
LDT2
18.5%
0.01
0.00
28
28
21
21
LHD1
2.9%
0.01
0.00
8
8
7
8
LHD2
0.4%
0.00
0.00
1
1
1
1
MCY
0.6%
0.01
0.00
1
1
1
1
MDV
12.31/6
0.01
0.00
24
24
19
19
MH
0.2%
0.00
000
0
1
0
0
Motor Coach
0.1%
0.00
0.00
0
0
0
0
OBUS
01%
0.00
0.00
0
0
0
0
PTO
01%
0.00
0.00
0
0
0
0
SBUS
0.1%
0.00
0.00
0
0
0
0
T6 Ag
0.0%
0.00
0.00
0
0
0
0
T6 CARP heavy
0.046
0.00
0.00
0
0
0
0
T6 CAIRP small
0.0%
0.00
0.00
0
0
0
0
T6 instate construction heavy
0+0%
0.00
0.00
0
0
0
0
T6 instate construction small
0.1%
0.00
0.00
0
0
0
0
T6 instate heavy
0.2%
0.00
0.00
1
1
1
1
T6 instate small
0.7%
0.00
0.00
3
3
2
2
T6 COS heavy
0.0%
0.00
0.00
0
0
0
0
T6 COS small
0.0%
0.00
0.00
0
0
0
0
T6 public
0.0%
0.00
0.00
0
0
0
0
T6 utility
0.0%
0.00
0.00
0
0
0
0
T6TS
0.2%
0.00
0.00
0
0
0
0
T7 Ag
0.0%
0.00
0.00
0
0
0
0
T7 CARP
0.4%
0.00
0.00
2
2
2
2
T7 CARP construction
0.0%
0.00
0.00
0
0
0
0
T71NNOOS
0.4%
0.00
0.00
2
3
2
2
T7NOOS
0.1%
0.00
0.00
1
1
1
1
T7 other port
0.0%
0.00
0.00
0
0
0
0
T7 POAK
0.2%
0.01
0.00
1
1
1
1
T7 POLA
0.0%
0.00
0.00
0
0
0
0
T7 public
00%
0.00
0.00
0
0
0
0
T7 Single
0.2%
0.00
0.00
1
1
1
1
T7 single construction
0.1%
0.00
0.00
0
0
0
0
T7 SWCV
0.1%
0.00
0.00
0
0
0
0
T7 tractor
0.7%
0.01
0.00
4
4
3
4
T7 tractor construction
0.0%
0.00
0.00
0
0
0
0
T7 utility
0.0%
0.00
0.00
0
0
0
0
TINS
0.0%
0.00
0.00
0
0
0
0
UBUS
0.1%
0.01
0.00
1
1
1
1
TOTAL
100.0%
0
0
152
153
0 116
117
NZOceavoo, oswere cakuMled uvng an on Mattel edjuslmeM pmNdM by CARB in AB 32 Tetllnlcel Appendices. The on -mlMel odlustmem uses a linearregression canelatng mO with NDx (N2o =
Daily aehkles miss tmmled (VMT) muXiphed by 3O days year to account for reduced traRC on weekends and Mittens. This assumption is conffileat with the Caldomb Air Resoumes Boards (GARB)
methodology within the Clbnme Change ecoping Plan Measure DacumeMadon SLpplemenL
Reduction Measures: New bicycle Facilities and Complementary Strategies and Bicycle Parking
VMT Reduction provided by Fehr & Peers
N20 emissions were raI,uWt.d using as aX -matlel aolusVnenl pmNded by CMa In PB 32 Techowal AppenOices. The off-motlel aSustment uses a (near regression carrelafing WO woe NOx (WO =
Daily Whi miles traveled "T) muNpli al by W da"ar to account for reduced lrarc on weekends and battle, This assumption is consistent with the Callon Air Resou ses Boants (CARB7
methodology within the Climate Change Sniping Plan Measure Oacumentioon Supplement.
Year
Divl VMT
Mutual VMT
2020
1.677
581,919
CO2w1Pavley+
CO2ew1Pavley+
Van
Percent of VMT
NOx
N20
CO2
CO2e
LCP
LCFS
All Other Buses
0.1%
0.00
0.00
0
0
0
0
LOA
551%
0.03
0.00
111
111
77
77
LDTi
5.9%
0.01
0.00
14
14
10
10
LDT2
18.5%
0.02
coo
51
51
38
39
LHD1
2.9%
0.03
0.00
15
15
14
14
LHD2
0.4%
0.00
0.00
2
2
2
2
MCY
0.6%
0.01
0.00
1
1
1
1
MDV
12.3%
0.02
000
43
43
34
34
MH
0.2%
0.00
O.00
1
1
1
1
Motor Coach
0A%
0.00
0.00
1
1
1
1
OBUS
0.1%
0.00
0.00
0
0
0
0
PTO
0.1%
coo
0.00
1
1
1
1
SBUS
0.1%
0.00
0.00
0
0
0
0
T6 Ag
0.0%
0.00
0.00
0
0
0
0
T6 CARP heavy
0.0%
0.00
0.00
0
0
0
0
T6 CARP small
0.0%
0.00
0.00
0
0
0
0
T6 instate construction heavy
0.0%
0.00
0.00
0
0
0
0
T6 instate construction small
0.1%
0.00
0.00
1
1
0
0
T6 instate heavy
0.2%
0.00
0.00
2
2
2
2
T6 instate small
0.7%
0.01
0.00
5
5
4
4
T6005 heavy
0.0%
0.00
O.DO
0
0
0
0
T6 COB small
0.0%
0.00
0.00
0
0
0
0
T6 public
0.0%
0.00
0.00
0
0
0
0
T6 utility
O.M.
0.00
0.00
0
0
0
0
T6TS
01%
0.00
0.00
1
1
1
1
T7 Ag
00%
0.00
0.00
0
0
0
0
T7 CARP
0.4%
0.01
0.00
4
4
4
4
T7 CARP construction
0.0%
0.00
0.00
0
0
0
0
T7NN00S
0.4%
0.01
0.00
4
5
4
4
T7NOOS
0.1%
0.00
0.00
1
1
1
1
T7 other Pon
0.0%
0.00
0.00
0
0
0
0
T7 POAK
0.29/.
0.01
0.00
2
2
2
2
T7 POLA
0.0%
0.00
0.00
0
0
0
0
T7 public
0.0a/o
0.00
0.00
0
0
0
0
T7 Single
0.2%
0.01
0.00
2
2
2
2
T7 single construction
0.1%
0.00
0.00
1
1
1
1
T7SWCV
0.1%
0.00
0.00
1
1
1
1
T7 tractor
0.7%
0.02
0.00
7
7
6
6
T7 tractor construction
0.0%
000
0.00
0
0
0
0
T7 utility
0.0%
0.00
0.00
0
0
0
0
T71S
0.0%
0.00
0.00
0
0
0
0
UBUS
0.1%
0.01
0.00
2
2
2
2
TOTAL
100.0%
0
0
274
276
0 209
211
N20 emissions were raI,uWt.d using as aX -matlel aolusVnenl pmNded by CMa In PB 32 Techowal AppenOices. The off-motlel aSustment uses a (near regression carrelafing WO woe NOx (WO =
Daily Whi miles traveled "T) muNpli al by W da"ar to account for reduced lrarc on weekends and battle, This assumption is consistent with the Callon Air Resou ses Boants (CARB7
methodology within the Climate Change Sniping Plan Measure Oacumentioon Supplement.
Reduction Measures: Neighborhood/ Site Enhancements - Pedestrian Network Improvements
VMT Reduction provided by Fehr & Peers
AnnuaIVMT
veh
Percent of VMT
NOx
N2O
CO2
CO2e
CO2wIPavley+
CO2ew /Pavley+
All Other Buses
0.1%
0.00
0.00
t
1
LCF
1
LCFS
1
LOA
55.2%
0.11
0.00
409
410
282
283
LDT1
5.991.
0.03
0.00
50
50
37
37
LDT2
18.5%
0.06
0.00
186
187
141
142
LHD1
2.991.
0.09
0.00
55
56
50
51
LHD2
0.49/6
0.02
0.00
7
7
6
6
MCY
0.6%
0.04
0.00
5
5
5
5
MDV
113%
0.08
0.00
157
158
124
125
MH
0.2%
0.02
0.00
3
3
3
3
Motor Coach
0A%
0.01
0.00
2
2
2
2
OBUS
0.1%
0.00
0.00
1
1
1
1
PTO
0.1%
0.01
0.00
2
3
2
2
SBUS
0.1%
0.01
0.00
1
t
1
1
T6 All
0.0%
0.00
0.00
0
0
0
0
T6 CARP heavy
0.0%
0.00
0.00
0
0
0
0
T6 CARP small
0.0%
0.00
0.00
0
0
0
0
T6 instate construction heavy
0.0%
0.00
0.00
1
1
1
1
T6 instate construction small
0.1%
0.00
0.00
2
2
2
2
T6 instate heavy
0.2%
0.02
0.00
6
6
6
6
T6 instate small
0.7%
0.02
0.00
17
18
16
16
T6 OOS heavy
0.0%
0.00
0.00
0
0
0
0
T6 OOS small
0.0%
0.00
0.00
0
0
0
0
T6 public
0.0%
0.00
0.00
1
1
1
1
T6 utility
0.091.
0.00
0.00
0
0
0
0
T6TS
0.29/6
0.01
0.00
3
3
2
2
T7 Ag
0.0%
0.00
0.00
1
1
1
1
T7 CARP
0.4%
0.03
0.00
15
15
13
13
T7 CARP construction
0.0%
0.00
0.00
1
t
1
1
T7NNOOS
0.4%
0.02
0.00
17
17
15
15
T7NOOS
0.1%
0.01
0.00
5
5
5
5
T7 other port
0.091.
0.01
0.00
1
1
1
1
T7 POAK
0.2%
0.03
0.00
8
8
7
7
T7 POLA
0.0%
0.00
0.00
0
0
0
0
T7 public
0.0%
0.01
0.00
1
1
1
1
T7 Single
0.2%
0.02
0.00
9
9
8
8
T7 single construction
0A%
0.01
0.00
2
2
2
2
T7 SWCV
0.1%
0.01
0.00
2
2
2
2
T7 tractor
0.7%
0.06
0.00
25
26
23
24
T7 tractor construction
0.0%
0.00
0.00
2
2
2
2
T7 utility
0.0%
0.00
0.00
0
0
0
0
T71S
0.0%
0
0
0
0
0
0
UBUS
0.1%
0
0
7
7
6
6
TOTAL
100.0%
1
0
1,008
1,O16
0 769
777
NW emisabins were calculated using an on -model adjualmem prodded by CARB in AS 32 Technical Appendices. The ananodel adjusbnent uses a linear regression conelaling WO with Nox (WO =
Daily undoes miss In Whad(VMn muMplsd by 347 dayy)ear to account b reduce! her an weekends and holidays. This assumption is cansistent with the California Air Resoumes BOans(CARB)
methWOlogy within the Clanate Change Scoping Plan Measure Documentation Supplement
Reduction Measures: Land Use /Location - Diversity
VMT Reduction provided by Fehr & Peers
N20 emissions were calculated using an off-model Ojnament pro,ded by CARE in AB 32 Technical Apperi ices. The off model adjustment uses a Imear regression cortela6ng WO with NOc (WO =
Dad vehicas mines traveled ( VMT) multigied by 347 dayeiyear to account for reduced taR on weekends and hoald,n, This asau apii is consider wdh the California Ar Resources 8aaMs (CARD)
methodology within the Clmlale Change scathing Pmn Measure Documenlatien Supplement.
Year
DahIy VMT
AmuaIVMT
2020
10,592
3,675,424
Veh
Percent of VMT
NOx
N20
CO2
CO2e
CO2wIPavley+
CO2e wl Pavley+
LCF
LCFS
All Other Buses
0.1%
0.0
0.0
2
2
2
2
LOA
551%
0.2
0.0
701
703
484
486
LDT1
5.9%
0.1
0.0
86
87
63
64
LDT2
18.5%
01
0.0
319
320
242
243
LHDi
2.90/6
01
0.0
95
96
85
87
LHD2
0.4%
0.0
0.0
12
12
11
11
MCY
0.6%
0.1
0.0
9
9
8
9
MDV
123%
c1l
0.0
269
271
213
214
MH
02%
00
0.0
6
6
5
5
Motor Coach
0.1%
00
0.0
4
4
3
3
OBUS
0.1%
0.0
0.0
2
2
2
2
PTO
01%
0.0
0.0
4
4
4
4
SBUS
0.1%
0.0
00
2
2
2
2
T6 Ag
00%
0.0
00
0
0
0
0
T6 CARP heavy
cogi
00
co
0
0
0
0
T6 CARP small
0.0%
0.0
0.0
0
0
0
0
T6 instate construction heavy
00%
co
0.0
1
1
1
1
T6 instate construction small
0.1%
0.0
0.0
3
3
3
3
T6 instate heavy
0,2%
0.0
0.0
11
11
10
10
T6 instate small
03%
0.0
0.0
30
30
27
27
T6 COS heavy
0.0%
0.0
0.0
0
0
0
0
T6 COS small
0.0%
0.0
0.0
0
0
0
0
T6 publ,
0.0%
0.0
co
1
1
1
1
T6 utility
0.0%
0.0
0.0
0
0
0
0
T6TS
0.21)6
0.0
0.0
5
5
4
4
T7 Ag
0.0%
0.0
0.0
2
2
1
1
T7 CARP
0.4%
0.0
0.0
25
25
22
23
T7 CARP construction
0.0%
0.0
0.0
2
2
1
1
T7NNOOS
0.4%
0.0
0.0
28
29
25
26
T7NOOS
0.1%
0.0
0.0
9
9
8
8
T7 other pod
0.0%
0.0
0.0
2
2
2
2
T7POAK
0.2%
0.1
co
13
14
12
12
T7 POLA
0.0%
0.0
co
0
0
0
0
T7 public
O.00k
0.0
0.0
2
2
1
2
T7 Single
02%
0.0
0.0
15
15
13
14
T7 single construction
0.1%
0.0
0.0
4
4
4
4
T7 SWCV
0.1%
0.0
0,0
4
4
4
4
T7 tractor
0.7%
0.1
0.0
44
45
39
40
T7 hector construction
0.0%
0.0
0.0
3
3
3
3
T7 utility
0.0%
0.0
0.0
0
0
0
0
T71S
0.0%
0.0
co
1
1
1
1
UBUS
0A%
0
0
11
12
10
11
TOTAL
100.0%
1
0
1,728
1,741
0 1,319
1,332
N20 emissions were calculated using an off-model Ojnament pro,ded by CARE in AB 32 Technical Apperi ices. The off model adjustment uses a Imear regression cortela6ng WO with NOc (WO =
Dad vehicas mines traveled ( VMT) multigied by 347 dayeiyear to account for reduced taR on weekends and hoald,n, This asau apii is consider wdh the California Ar Resources 8aaMs (CARD)
methodology within the Clmlale Change scathing Pmn Measure Documenlatien Supplement.
Other Emissions Measures
Low Carbon Fuel Standard (LCFS)
Note: On December 29, 2011 the U.S. District Court issued a preliminary injunction on the California Air Resources Board (CARE) from enforcing the
LCFS during litigation. However, CARB will continue to hold stakeholder meetings and rulemaking processing.
Existing
GHG MTons
2020
GHG Worts
Increase
GHG MTons
Agricultural Equipment
11
11
0
Construction Equipment
2,563
2,563
0
Lawn &Garden Equipment
693
784
91
Light Commercial Equipment
403
460
57
Total Stationary Equipment
1 3,670
3,818
148
Based on OFFRoad2D07
Low Carbon Fuel Standard (LCFS)
Note: On December 29, 2011 the U.S. District Court issued a preliminary injunction on the California Air Resources Board (CARE) from enforcing the
LCFS during litigation. However, CARB will continue to hold stakeholder meetings and rulemaking processing.
Measure RE -4: Adopt an ordinance to ban the use of two - stroke engine leaf blowers. As part of this ordinance, establish planting and
maintenance guidelines to reduce maintenance needs.
Percent of Lawn & Garden that is Leaf blowers: 4.3%
Reduction
Worts
Lawn &Garden Equipment 75
The Town of Los Gatos would adopt an ordinance to ban two - stroke engine leaf
Implementation: blowers in place of electric and other non - electric devices.
Measure OS -1: Identify and inventory potential community garden and urban farm sites on public easements, PG &E easements, right -of -ways,
and schoolyards, and develop a program to establish community gardens in appropriate locations.
GHG reductions estimates are not quantified for this measure.
The Town of Los Gatos, Community Development Department, Planning Division,
Implementation: would inventory potential community garden /urban farm sites.
Total
Reduction
Worts
GHG MTons
Agricultural Equipment
1
10
Construction Equipment
256
2,307
Lawn &Garden Equipment
78
706
Light Commercial Equipment
46
414
GHG Reductions /Total
382
3,436
Measure RE -4: Adopt an ordinance to ban the use of two - stroke engine leaf blowers. As part of this ordinance, establish planting and
maintenance guidelines to reduce maintenance needs.
Percent of Lawn & Garden that is Leaf blowers: 4.3%
Reduction
Worts
Lawn &Garden Equipment 75
The Town of Los Gatos would adopt an ordinance to ban two - stroke engine leaf
Implementation: blowers in place of electric and other non - electric devices.
Measure OS -1: Identify and inventory potential community garden and urban farm sites on public easements, PG &E easements, right -of -ways,
and schoolyards, and develop a program to establish community gardens in appropriate locations.
GHG reductions estimates are not quantified for this measure.
The Town of Los Gatos, Community Development Department, Planning Division,
Implementation: would inventory potential community garden /urban farm sites.
Other Emissions Measures
Measure OS-2: Encourage significant new residential developments over 50 units to include space that can be used to grow food.
GHG reductions estimates are not quantified for this measure.
The Town of Los Gatos, Community Development Department, Planning Division,
would review development applications that have over 50 units for the potential
Implementation: to include community garden sites.
Measure OS -3: Establish a process through which a neighborhood can propose and adopt a site as a community garden.
GHG reductions estimates are not quantified for this measure.
The Town of Los Gatos, Community Service Department, would establish
Implementation: processes for neighborhoods to propose /adopt community garden sites.
Measure OS -4: Continue to support the Los Gatos Farmers' Market as a source for locally -grown food.
GHG reductions estimates are not quantified for this measure.
The Town of Los Gatos, Community Service Department, would continue to
Implementation: support the Los Gatos Farmer's Market.
Measure OS-5: Encourage the Los Gatos farmers' market to accept food stamps and other public food benefits.
GHG reductions estimates are not quantified for this measure.
The Town of Los Gatos, Community Service Department, would coordinate with
the manager(s) of the Los Gatos Farmer's Market to accept food stamps and
Implementation: other public food benefits.
Measure OS -6: Continue to actively pursue wildland fire prevention in forested areas of Los Gatos to avoid loss of carbon sequestration.
GHG reductions estimates are not quantified for this measure.
The Town of Los Gatos, Parks and Public Works Department, Parks and Forestry
Division, would continue to ensure wildland fire prevention incoordination with
the Santa Clara County Fire Department and CALFire )for State Responsibility
Implementation: Areas).
Other Emissions Measures
Measure CA -2: Establish and maintain a "sustainability information center' at the Town Hall or Library to inform the public and distribute
available brochures, and provide information on sustainability on the Town's website. Emphasize on -line outreach materials to minimize paper
consumption.
GHG reductions estimates are not quantified for this measure.
The Town of Los Gatos, Community Services Department, would establish and
Implementation: maintain a sustainability information center (on- and off - line).
Measure CA -3: Continue the Los Gatos: Growing Greener Together Campaign, which provides Town employees and community members
with a newsletter featuring green tips and best practices for home and at work. Expand this program to provide best practice information at public
venues, such as the farmers' market.
GHG reductions estimates are not quantified for this measure.
The Town of Los Gatos, Parks and Public Works Department, would continue to
Implementation: promote the Growing Greener Together Campaign.
Measure CA-4: Continue economic vitality programs aimed at supporting local business by encouraging residents to shop locally.
GHG reductions estimates are not quantified for this measure.
The Town of Los Gatos, Community Services Department, would continue to
Implementation: implement programs aimed at supporting local businesses.
Measure CA -$: Support voluntary programs to Improve sustainability in Los Gatos.
GHG reductions estimates are not quantified for this measure.
The Town of Los Gatos, Community Services Department, would support other
Implementation: sustainability programs in the City.
A P P E N D I X D
TRANSPORTATION AND LAND USE
MEASURES MODELING SUMMARY
FEHRtPEERS
MEMORANDUM
Date: July 9, 2012
To: Tanya Sundberg and Joanna Jansen, The Planning Center - DC &E
From: Franziska Church and Alexandra Sweet, Fehr & Peers
Subject. Los Gatos General Plan VMT and GHG Emission Reduction Analysis
tnr -i»o
This memorandum summarizes the technical approach and results of the vehicle miles traveled
(VMT) and greenhouse gas (GHG) reduction estimates for the Town of Los Gatos as part of the
Los Gatos Sustainability Plan (SP). In consultation with The Planning Center and the Town of Los
Gatos staff, transportation measures were identified that would reduce town GHG emissions. The
measures were developed based on policies, strategies, and actions from Los Gatos General Plan
and Town staff.
KEY FINDINGS
Implementing Town controlled transportation measures would reduce VMT and GHG
emissions by approximately 1.88 percent by the year 2020 compared to no controlled
measures.
• Implementing Town controlled measures would reduce total annual VMT in Los Gatos by
11.61 million by 2020.
SERVICE POPULATION
To be consistent with the Regional Targets Advisory Committee (RTAC) recommendation to the
California Transportation Commission (CTC), we recommend the use of VMT per service
population (residents + employment) as the best metric to compare various land use and
roadway network scenarios. This measurement accounts for the fact that, while there is absolute
growth in VMT, the rate of VMT "per service population' can be reduced. Table 1 shows the year
2008 and 2020 service population for the Town of Los Gatos.
VMT ESTIMATES
Details about the technical approach and VMT estimates for the base year (2005) and future year
(2020) are presented in the Los Gatos General Plan VMTAnalysis (Fehr & Peers, October 18, 2011).
The daily VMT estimates are presented by year in Table 2.
160 West Santa Clara Street, Suite 675, San Jose CA 95113 (408) 278 -1700 Fax (408) 278-1717
www.fehrandpeers.com
Tanya Sundberg and Joanna Jansen
July 9, 2012
Page 2 of 15
DAILY MEASURE OF EFFECTIVENESS APPROACH
Vehicle Miles Traveled Estimates
The 2005 base year Valley Transportation Authority (VTA) travel demand forecasting model was
used to develop town -wide daily VMT estimates. VMT is typically an output from travel demand
forecast models and is calculated based on the number of automobile trips multiplied by the
distance traveled by each car trip. As such, the estimated VMT is dependent on the level of detail
in the network and other variables related to vehicle movement through the network. The volume
and distance of traffic depends on land use types, density/intensity, and patterns as well as the
supporting transportation system. A travel demand forecasting model is used to represent this
relationship when forecasting vehicle trips and VMT.
Although the calculation of VMT is simply the number of automobile trips multiplied by the
distance traveled by each trip, VMT performance measures can be reported differently. These
performance measures can be calculated for the entire roadway network, which may extend
beyond a specific geographic area such as the physical limits of a city or project area. Specifically,
the current state of the practice technique for determining the VMT estimates from municipalities
is the "origin- destination" (OD) method.
TABLE 1:
SERVICE POPULATION
DAILY VEHICLE MILES TRAVELED ESTIMATES
Scenario
Base Year (2008)
2020 Population
Residential Population
Base Year (2008)
28,810
32,600
Employees
2020 General Plan (2020)
18,820
21,480
Service Population'
Note:
47,630
54,080
Notes:
'Service population within Los Gatos = residents + employees.
Source: Town of Los Gatos, October, 2011.
Source: Fehr & Peers, 2011
DAILY MEASURE OF EFFECTIVENESS APPROACH
Vehicle Miles Traveled Estimates
The 2005 base year Valley Transportation Authority (VTA) travel demand forecasting model was
used to develop town -wide daily VMT estimates. VMT is typically an output from travel demand
forecast models and is calculated based on the number of automobile trips multiplied by the
distance traveled by each car trip. As such, the estimated VMT is dependent on the level of detail
in the network and other variables related to vehicle movement through the network. The volume
and distance of traffic depends on land use types, density/intensity, and patterns as well as the
supporting transportation system. A travel demand forecasting model is used to represent this
relationship when forecasting vehicle trips and VMT.
Although the calculation of VMT is simply the number of automobile trips multiplied by the
distance traveled by each trip, VMT performance measures can be reported differently. These
performance measures can be calculated for the entire roadway network, which may extend
beyond a specific geographic area such as the physical limits of a city or project area. Specifically,
the current state of the practice technique for determining the VMT estimates from municipalities
is the "origin- destination" (OD) method.
TABLE 2
DAILY VEHICLE MILES TRAVELED ESTIMATES
Scenario
VMTI
VMT per Service Population
Base Year (2008)
1,495,910
31A
2020 General Plan (2020)
1,765,370
32.6
Note:
' Rounded to nearest ten (ten)
Source: Fehr & Peers, 2011
DAILY MEASURE OF EFFECTIVENESS APPROACH
Vehicle Miles Traveled Estimates
The 2005 base year Valley Transportation Authority (VTA) travel demand forecasting model was
used to develop town -wide daily VMT estimates. VMT is typically an output from travel demand
forecast models and is calculated based on the number of automobile trips multiplied by the
distance traveled by each car trip. As such, the estimated VMT is dependent on the level of detail
in the network and other variables related to vehicle movement through the network. The volume
and distance of traffic depends on land use types, density/intensity, and patterns as well as the
supporting transportation system. A travel demand forecasting model is used to represent this
relationship when forecasting vehicle trips and VMT.
Although the calculation of VMT is simply the number of automobile trips multiplied by the
distance traveled by each trip, VMT performance measures can be reported differently. These
performance measures can be calculated for the entire roadway network, which may extend
beyond a specific geographic area such as the physical limits of a city or project area. Specifically,
the current state of the practice technique for determining the VMT estimates from municipalities
is the "origin- destination" (OD) method.
Tanya Sundberg and Joanna Jansen
July 9, 2012
Page 3 of 15
The OD method tracks the vehicle trips being generated by a geographic area (i.e., a town) across
the entire regional transportation network to their ultimate destinations. The OD method excludes
trips that pass through the Town — with neither an origin nor destination within the Town. We
recommend use of the OD method to account for all the VMT generated in a jurisdiction such as
the Town of Los Gatos, since it directly accounts for trips that may be affected by actions to
reduce travel taken by the Town.
Because a portion of the external to internal (XI) trips are typically employment heavy trips during
the morning and evening peak periods, the VMT per service population was calculated using the
total residential population and employment within the Town. This method is consistent with the
Regional Targets Advisory Committee (RTAC) recommendation to the California Transportation
Commission (CTC) for estimating VMT. Again, this measure accounts for the fact that while there
is absolute growth in VMT over time, the rate of VMT "per person" can be reduced.
VMT REDUCr1ON MEASURES
The California Air Pollution Control Officers Association
( CAPCOA) prepared a report titled Quantifying Greenhouse
Gas Mitigation Measures: A Resource for Local Government to
Assess Emission Reductions from Greenhouse Gas Mitigation
Measures (2010). This report was prepared in collaboration
with the Northeast States for Coordinated Air Use
Management (NESCAUM) and the National Association of
Clean Air Agencies; and, the report was also prepared with
contracted support from ENVIRON and Fehr & Peers for
technical analysis. The report provides methods for
quantifying emission reductions from a specified list of
mitigation measures, primarily focused on project -level
mitigation. The emissions calculations include greenhouse
gases (GHGs), particulate matter (PM), carbon monoxide (CO),
oxides of nitrogen (NOJ, sulfur dioxide (SO2), and reactive
organic gases (ROG), as well as toxic air pollutants, where
information is available.
Quant!4
Greenhouse
Mltlgatlon Meas
A Rtewv<e tut ILpe 0-1
Greenrvn Gas M$Ep Measiun
August 1010
Figure 1: CAPCOA report cover
The measures included in the CAPCOA report were selected because they are frequently
considered as mitigation for GHG impacts, and standardized methods for quantifying emissions
from these projects were not previously available. Measures were screened on the basis of the
feasibility of quantifying the emissions, the availability of robust and meaningful data upon which
to base the quantification, and whether the measures (alone or in combination with other
measures) would result in appreciable reductions in GHG emissions. The report does not suggest
that other measures should not be considered, or that they might not be effective or quantifiable;
on the contrary, there are many options and approaches to mitigate emissions of GHGs. CAPCOA
sought to provide a high quality quantification tool to local governments with the broadest
applicability possible, given the resource limitations for the project. CAPCOA encourages local
governments to be bold and creative as they approach the challenge of climate change, and does
not intend this report to limit the scope of measures considered for mitigation.
Tanya Sundberg and Joanna Jansen
July 9, 2012
Page 4 of 15
The CAPCOA report discuss programs and concepts associated with GHG quantification, which
are intended to provide background information for those interested in the context in which
reductions are being made. The report also discusses the underpinnings of the quantification
methods, limitations in the data used as well as limitations in applying the methods, an overview
of the mitigation measure categories including key considerations in the quantification of
emission reductions in those categories, and the effectiveness of the measures and how
combining measures changes the effectiveness.
VMT REDUCTIONS
In consultation with The Planning Center and Town staff, transportation measures were identified
that would reduce GHG emissions for the Town of Los Gatos. The measures were developed
based on policies, strategies, and actions from Town staff and the Los Gatos General Plan. In
development of the baseline VMT estimates and quantified VMT reductions, we completed a
multi -step process as follows:
1. Group the VMT reduction measures into categories that are both quantifiable and
mutually dependent (see Table 6).
2. Estimate off -model VMT reductions. These reductions were reviewed to avoid double
counting of complementary strategies. The measures shown in Table 6 were input into a
VMT reduction estimation tool, which utilizes results from the CAPCOA report discussed
above.
3. Calculate VMT reduction percentages due to implementation of the measures (detailed
calculations in Table A2).
Each measure's contribution to VMT reductions was quantified and is summarized in Tables 3. A
typical VMT reduction range for each measure is provided for reference. The VMT reduction is
applied to all VMT for the OD method.
As shown in Table 3, the total daily VMT reduction under future conditions is approximately 0.95
to 3.45 percent. The approximate reduction of 1.88 percent for the future years would be the
equivalent to a reduction of approximately 33,467 daily vehicle miles traveled (VMT) in 2020.
Annual VMT reductions are also presented in Table 3.
Tanya Sundberg and Joanna Jansen
October 26, 2012
Page 5 of 15
TABLE 3:
EFFECTIVENESS OF REDUCTION MEASURES
Daily Reductions'
Estimated Percent Reduction
Year 2020
VMT Strategy Typical
Measure
Reduction Range
in Los Gatos
VMT 2.3
Land Use/ Location
Diversity
0.30% - 1.50%
0.60%
10,592
Neighborhood / Site Enhancements
Pedestrian Network
Improvements
0.00% - 0.60%
0.35%
6,179
New Bicycle Facilities
0.05% - 0.14%
0.10%
1,677
Transit System Improvements
Network Expansion
0.00% - 0.10%
%
929
929
Commute Trip Reduction Strategies
Reduction
Maximum
Transit Fare subsidy
0.83% - 1.32%
0.83%
Alternative Work
Schedules &
Telecommute
0.21% - 0.70%
0.21%
Program
0.45%
7,872
Ride Share Program I
0.25%- 1.25%
0.25%
Marketing & I
0.20% - 1.08%
0.20%
Promotion
School Pool
0.90% - 1.80%
0.90%
Total of All Measures
0.95% - 3.45%
1.54%
27,249
Annual Reduction
1.54%
9,455,327
Notes:
' Town VMT based on select zone analysis using one -half external trip approach (Internal to Internal (0), One -Half Internal to
External (0.5 *IX) and External to Internal (0.5 *)(I).
' These values are rounded for presentation purposes.
' Annual VMT is calculated by multiplying the daily VMT by 347 days to account for reduced vehicle activity on the weekends.
This method is consistent with the CARB Pavley I and LCFS postprocessor.
Source: Fehr & Peers, October 2012.
Tanya Sundberg and Joanna Jansen
July 9, 2012
Page 6 of 15
Tanya Sundberg and Joanna Jansen
July 9, 2012
Page 7 of 15
ANALYSIS RESULTS
The base and future year daily land -based VMT, including the VMT per service population, for
unincorporated Town of Los Gatos are presented in Table 4.
TABLE 4:
VEHICLE MILES TRAVELED SUMMARY
Vehicle Miles Traveled'
Year
Year
Measure'
Unitsz
2005
2020
Before Implementation of Reduction Measures
Daily vehicle miles traveled (VMT)
mi
1,495,910
1,765,370
Daily VMT per service population
mi /capita
31.4
32.6
After Implementation of Reduction Measures
Reduction Range
--
Avg 1.88%
Daily VMT
mi
1,495,910
1,732,181
Daily VMT per service population
mi / capita
31.4
32.03
Annual VMT'
mm
519.08
601.07
Notes:
' Town VMT based on select zone analysis using one -half external trip approach (Internal to Internal (11), One -Half
Internal to External (0.5.1X) and External to Internal (0.5'X).
' mi = miles, mm = million miles
3 Service population = residents + employees.
° Annual VMT is calculated by multiplying the daily VMT by 347 to account for reduced vehicle activity on the
weekends. This method is consistent with the CARB Pavley I and LCFS postprocessor.
Source: Fehr & Peers, April 2012.
IMPLEMENTATION AND COSTS
The following section lists the costs for each of the VMT reduction measures, plus the party
responsible for each measure's implementation. Each measure has an associated cost that is an
estimate of how much the Town must dedicate towards the measure's implementation. The cost
estimates are shown in Table S. The full list of reduction measures and their implementation and
cost estimates are listed in Table 6.
Tanya Sundberg and Joanna Jansen
July 9, 2012
Page 8 of 15
TABLE 5 —TOWN COST ESTIMATES FOR IMPLEMENTATION
Cost Metric
Impact on Staff Time
Minimal
Requires no investment, or, generates a profit
Low
Uses existing staff
Low -Mid
Existing staff can implement but will require reprioritization of workload
Medium
Requires new staff or contract(s) to implement ($100,000 - $200,000)
Medium -High
Requires new staff or contract(s) to implement ($200,000 - $500,000)
High
Requires new staff or contract(s) to implement (>$500,000)
Adopted from County of San Luis Obispo, 2011
TABLE 6 — VMT REDUCTION IMPLEMENTATION AND COSTS
Cross- Implementing
Strategy Time -Frame Costs
Reference Parry
Land Use/ Location
Diversity
Require a variety of local- serving
commercial uses and encourage mixed-
LU -3
Town Action /
Near Term
Low
use development in the North Forty area,
Development
1 -5 Years
reducing vehicle miles traveled (VMT).
Neighborhood / Site Enhancements
Pedestrian Network Improvements
Require all new buildings, excluding
single - family homes, to include a principal
functional entry that faces a public space
Town Action /
such as a street, square, park, paseo, or
LU -1
Development
On -Going
Low
plaza, in addition to any entrance from a
parking lot, to encourage pedestrian foot
traffic.
Require new projects, excluding single -
family homes, to include pedestrian or
bicycle through - connections to existing
LU -2
Town Action /
On -Going
Low
sidewalks and existing or future bicycle
Development
facilities, unless prohibited by
topographical conditions.
Seek grant funding to establish a Safe
Town /School
Near Term
Routes to School (SR2S) Program to
TR -11
Action
1 -5 Years
Low- Medium
increase more student walking and biking
Tanya Sundberg and Joanna Jansen
July 9, 2012
Page 9 of 15
TABLE 6— VMT REDUCTION IMPLEMENTATION AND COSTS
Strategy
gy
ross-
Implementing
Time -Frame
Costs
Reference
Party
trips.
Design and implement traffic- calming
measures on specific streets to dissuade
Near Term
Route 17 cut - through traffic and attract
TR -13
Town Action
1 -5 Years
High
pedestrian and bicycle traffic.
Implement transit access improvements
through sidewalk/crosswalk safety
Near Term
enhancements and bus shelter
TR -14
Town Action
1 -S Years
High
improvements.
Complementing Strategies
Require bicycle parking facilities and
on -site showers in major non-
Near -Term
residential development and
TR -4
Town Action
1 -5 Years
Low
redevelopment projects.
Install high - quality bicycle - parking
facilities Downtown in centralized,
TR -5
Town Action
Near -Term
Low- Medium
safe, and secure areas.
1 -5 Years
Support non - profit and volunteer
organizations in creating a bicycle-
TR -18
Town Action
Near -Term
Low
sharing program.
1 -5 Years
Parking Policy / Pricing Strategies
Complementing Strategies
Provide better wayfinding and smart
parking strategies with attractive
signage to reduce vehicle circulation
TR -15
Town Action
Mid -Term
Medium -High
searching for parking spaces
5 -10 Years
Downtown.
Support non - profit and volunteer
organizations in conducting outreach
to reduce car idling around schools
TR -19
Town Action
This Year
Low
during pick -up and drop -off times.
Transit System Improvements
Provide a fixed -route shuttle system to
the downtown area from key residential
areas, employment and commercial
R -1
Town Action
Near -Term
Medium -High
centers, Vasona Light Rail, and Vasona
1 -S Years
Park.
Commute Trip Reduction Strategies
Tanya Sundberg and Joanna Jansen
July 9, 2012
Page 10 of 15
TABLE 6 —VMT REDUCTION IMPLEMENTATION AND COSTS
Strategy
Cross-
Implementing
Time -Frame
Costs
Reference
Party
Implement a required Employer Commute
Trip Reduction Program for new
development and a voluntary program for
existing development. This would be a
multi- strategy program that encompasses
Town Action/
Near -Term
a combination of individual measures:
TR -2
Development
Low - Medium
ride -share programs, discounted transit
Action
1 -5 Years
programs, end -of -trip facilities (e.g.
showers and lockers), encouraging
telecommuting, and preferential parking
permit programs.
Implement a School Pool Program that
Town
Near -Term
helps match parents to carpool students
TR -10
Action /School
Low
to school.
Action
1 -5 Years
Coordinate with local school districts on
marketing, promoting, and educating
TR -12
Town Action/
Near -Term
Low
students about the benefits of using
School Action
1 -5 Years
public transit as a mode of travel.
Complementary Strategies
Require designated or preferred
Town Action/
Near -Term
parking for vanpools, carpools, and
TR -6
Development
Low
electric vehicles.
Action
1 -5 Years
Install electric vehicle charging stations
in high traffic areas through grant-
TR -7
Town Action
Mid -Term
Medium
funded programs encouraging electric
5 -10 Years
vehicle use.
Support non - profit and volunteer
Near -Term
organizations in creating or providing
TR -17
Town Action
Low
1 -5 Years
a car - sharing program.
Notes:
1. ` These measures are not included within the CAPCOA VMT quantification tool due to limited studies and
resources.
Fehr & Peers, 2012.
V)
04
W
W
�
�
�
�
W
�
§
&
3
}
\
\
\
\
{
}
\
{
§ � \
:�
_
§
.2
/} f
»
kE
!If
\
)
§
\ r
3:
e
§
2«\
j
R
£
k
\�
\��
k
§
?\
\
§
{
�
.
{�§
Im
}
»
ƒ
~-
c E
§
_
3
C
w
C
10
C
O
cc
m
Ol
V N 0
O
Ol
T �
F- 75 a
C
0
o
a°
3'
�
o
loll
N c
T
N
O
N
O
OD
-
O
u Ol
M
I�
N
W
O
M
. p Q
m E
N
N
al
N
°y
C9
Ol
Q m O
p
m c j
i
� C
a
$ 3
E a a
Q
O C
O
O O'
W
O
W
y
w
O m
O
H
f
w
c
O
O
>
>
-
m
O
> 0 N
> W N
>
>
O
O
0=
m w
A
O
E
Oa
O"O
O E
O E
y
V
d-
E °
E°
Ea
Ed
E
w
:a
L O
3 E
N
E
�
0
a
N
m
E
o
E
o
E
o f a
2
E
c
'Y
E
c
'y
E .,
p
Ell� a
,.
a
m
..
a
o
v 75 i3
c
n
o.
m
a
Q
E
W
H
G
OT
o
O
a
O
a
G
a
E
E
w
w
w
3
C?
a
d
6 N a
o
O
T
v'
F
Y
p
E > O
j
a
c
c
c
c
C
c
c
° o c
p
o
O
o
N
o
_0
0
0
1O a
W
C
✓
y
6
u
Q
V
Q
C 0
O
u
Q
Yi
Q
U
Q
v
Q
o
O H C
C
C
C
C
V
Q
p
C
C
C
T m V o
w
t-
0
H
C
ti
ti
F-
w y
a
E
a
2� o
= V
W
N � 6
w
O
m a
.Lw.
w
N
N
N
�
,Nq
b
n
ti
O C
y p
a
v a
o
>
1.1
y
w v E c
Ol
a
a m w O
C �
o'00
CO
Ol
r
z
o
m
e
a s
Y
2
•�
v
`•
E
n
o f
o
N
F=
3 E
w
o
°�
w
v
u
E' o w
w
> a
m
o
rn
c
a
w
y
.oc
In
y w v r
Im
E
�-
w
N
a
O
A
.. -FF
O
O
V
F"
C
Q 10
6'
V
VI
Z N M V
d
C
N
C
N
O
v
c
m
d M
9 ti
'O ry
C ti p
� O
{n ry M
N
Oi
C m
F- 75
C
O
Y
V
C C
F- CL
e
N
d
m
O
V
Vt
J
7
V
N
m
W
V
cc
z
ti
O
Q
A
E
z
Q
a
'a
z
V
q
�
a
0
0,
W
C
f
C
�
E
d
�
a
a
�
J
m
d
w
N
Q
V
d
O
d
m
a.
E
of
y
d N
J N
q O
N
�
d d
y a
v
C
c
C
N
O
Ol
v
6 N ~
E '� O
� O �
T cr N
c T O
Fm D
T
C
=
a
o
0
o
a
a
O
0
0
�
10(1
a
o
o
m
N
o
n
cc
I
.OD
ri
N
O
p
a
W
N
N
�
G
O
G
O
O.
O.
O
O
O
e
�
T
T� o
p 9
C
Ql
O1E o
E w c
o
m
w
V 3
O 0
� w'°
E
5r
'�-
- O >
v
c 'J
m
-p
o.co p
n
ai vy
3 6
n
c
N O>
C
O c
F T
N
O
N Q
o
N j
O Ol n
>. Q
O
d
E m
O E aL.
v p
E c
O
F-
E
s '0 o
o
g
Q $ V Z
c E
v
o
O
N
Q
u
Q
m w m
v
�
>,
O
C
0 v
p N
J_
Vl
M Q
UI
c
O 3
O
Q
0 L W
YO C
N y JO O
v1 Y
o J
0
O
E
V1 N
N O E
N v
M
rl
0
UI 2�
0
E
z
? 3>
' E
o a
@
V
K
m
m
V
>
K
K
CC
J
N
C N
UI
Q
a
p a
a
N
F
O
i+
o
N O
O
In O
o O
p
p
�
O O
a s
O
o n
.-I O
o n
N O
n
p
0
n
f0
ri �
O OI
O
N N
N N
d
y
v
Q
M Q
o Q
o Q
Q
o
O O
00
'o
oo O
O
°o
a
°*
a
a
rn
o a
e
o° V
W
m V
V
o
W N
N
N d
u.
� N
jp
rrl d
N
v1
N
�
II N
C
II to
�
II N
N
II
1p
L
W
C
C
y
O
w
y
>O
c
u
T
A
E
T
N
T
\
N N
m
J
> d
E
w
o
o
zE
E
>
1
J
E
v
N
O
j
E
t
v E
3
E
_ N o
w
G
'y
d
Z
Q N
N
p
F
fL
z
F
U
c
d
N
C
,O
C
C
O
m
Ol
4! �
C 0 O
N a
Oi
C > m
� � a
c
°
o
0
iE
d
O
�i41;
cz
O
�
oO0
¢
d. A
m o
f
o
c
c
v O
N
Q m
>
NO
p
Tp O
p
Y
u
O "
x_ Q
�
E a
o
d
d '
.S
8R
d
_ m
O
H
O Q
:
�
Q
d V
A
n
N
C
«
L O
N
O
0
0
v E
z
d
w
O
a
E
a
E
c
r-
E
w
o
.4+
w
0 E
O
E
aR
1O
E O
V
N
W
E n
m
Q
N
O C
d
a '"
`or
o
aE
o
E 'c
w ,o
E ¢
V
tf
J
N
L
a
�
w
m
pr:4
O
a Q v
N
3 O c
z
z
iO
E o
,r o
E
p
a
N
= � p
N 7
J
a
Q w
N S
V
v c
p
0-.
w
�
a _ E
o 'x
~
o
o d m
= m u E
Q
SIC
t
t
~
d m Ot d
N C
F
O
O
d
10
w0
O w
-
-o .> T
O�
.I
d
Vdf
II N
II Vdi
m C d �
c a o
m O d V
'=
O O
a
s
66 C
_
O
T
E
o0
o
i
«
Y o
0
E d E
O s
Z .i N t+l d
A P P E N O/ X E
LOS GATOS SUSTAINABILITY PLAN
COMMUNITYWIDE EMISSIONS
REDUCTION MEASURES
APPENDIX E
LOS GATOS SU9TAINASILITY PLAN COMMUNITYWIDE
EMISSIONS REDUCTION MEASURES
This table lists the emissions reduction measures that are included in the Los
Gatos Draft Sustainability Plan. The measures are divided into the following
sectors:
♦ Land Use and Community Design
♦ Transportation
♦ Green Building
♦ Renewable Energy and Low Carbon Fuels
♦ Energy Conservation
♦ Water and Wastewater
♦ Solid Waste
♦ Open Space
♦ Purchasing
♦ Community Action
The measures were initially developed based on adopted Los Gatos General
Plan policies, model policies from the California Air Pollution Control
Officers Association (CAPCOA) and California Institute for Local
Government AG) Climate Action Network, and similar adopted plans in
other built -out Bay Area communities. Then, Town staff and consultants
held a study session with the Town Council and an open house and
workshop with community members to gather feedback on the preliminary
measures. The measures were refined based on this input, and the consultant
team then modeled the revised suite of measures to estimate individual and
total GHG emissions reductions.
This matrix provides the following information for each measure:
♦ The estimated GHG emission reduction achieved by the measure, and
the percent of overall GHG emission reduction this represents.
♦ The cost effectiveness of the measure, meaning a comparison of its
capacity for reducing GHG emissions versus its anticipated net cost.
Measures that have minimal or even positive financial impacts, such as
those that repay their own costs over time, are highly cost - effective.
However, measures with low cost- effectiveness should not be precluded
from consideration. A measure such as adding bicycle parking makes a
small reduction in GHG emissions, but may nonetheless be of high value
E•1
TOWN OF LOS GATOS
LOS GATOS SUSTAINASILITY PLAN
APPENDIX E
to the community and provide other benefits not considered in this cost -
effectiveness evaluation.
♦ The parties responsible for implementing the strategy (Town, private
developers, etc.).
♦ An approximate implementation schedule that will allow the Town to
meet its GHG emissions reduction target by the 2020 horizon year
established in State law and BAAQMD guidelines.
E•2
.O
O
a
C
Fo° o H o
O
O
N
O�
� E �
n 3 0
F � o
q a;
C
O_
oEG a'
O J �
�Fa
S o N
F � v
O 9 O
e Oi r
_°
U
x
U
2°
i �
e
uoz
=
=
a
O
-
-
Q
C
O
`o —.
O
K
— c
h
c ° .5 2
O
C L
E s
.y'
e �
u F.
Upi }
>
o �
a
E
—
r-C
o
C
C
�
-
c
_
_
3
—
`o —.
�Fv
K
— c
h
c ° .5 2
.y'
e �
u F.
Upi }
>
o �
a
UI
z
U
U
1
.y'
—
r-C
C
C
�
UI
z
U
U
1
.y'
-
o
0
J
_
u
ui
U
:.
W
N
Q
W
Q
3
a
a
0
W
k
0
tu
2
W
Q
Q
Q
L
O
V .I I v
0
N
C
�
a
�
O M
E
O'y 00�
e a`
m
cc
V °aa
c
3
o
F
a
F
Q
V .I I v
III
ci 5
w
0
ry
0
O
a
�
O M
O'y 00�
e a`
V °aa
o0
III
ci 5
w
0
ry
0
O
ry
N
O O
° o c
U
V
a
U
U
FpE�
G
T
a
0
1
N .
a
T
U
F
6
Z
00
a
w a
z
0 c
V
a
W U
0
O
U
V
i
III
U
V
a
U
U
FpE�
G
T
a
0
1
N .
a
T
U
F
6
Z
00
a
w a
z
0 c
V
a
W U
0
O
U
V
00
Ij
o
O
o
N
W
N
Q
cW
G
Q
3
2
cJ
C
10,
V
W
k
D
2
W
Q
Q
Q
z
U UU>
� c
n �
0
w�
o c 9
— c E
5 3 0
psi
fa
Ely
�- - -
w Iv
G S
ry
Er
ry
h
N
—
E
-
_
_
_
=
-
c
�
s
-
a
-
is
�
4
Q
-
c
d u
'
O
C
U n
3
3
c
0
off'
o
s
z
U UU>
� c
n �
0
w�
o c 9
— c E
5 3 0
psi
fa
Ely
�- - -
w Iv
E
0
Fa
F
y
a
a
O
Of 1
ry
o
c
-
—
o
-
_
_
_
O C q
-
�
s
-
-
is
-
c
d u
'
O
C
o CJ
3
3
c
o
s
lu 3
a
�
3
j
e
�
K
Po
E
0
Fa
F
y
a
a
O
Of 1
o
c
-
—
o
-
_
_
_
O C q
-
�
s
-
-
is
-
c
d u
'
O
C
lu 3
3
E
0
Fa
F
y
a
a
O
Of 1
!I
(.
L
C
_ '� s
`_
— - i
o
_'-
��C
C1
i
3 �1=
C _ _
c
_
�
�
_
_
_
>
_
_
-
_
_
_
ii
_
_
I
�
_ _
_
� -
< =
_
_
_
-
_
C1
i
3 �1=
C _ _
�i -_ I
- !
-� ' I 3 'c c c 3
__ _ -� _ _
_ _ s — _ _
I � 1 =� � _
0
_ —
'! v r
_ _
_ I _
`ri
c
_
�
�
_
_
_
>
_
_
-
_
_
_
a
_
_
I
�
_ _
_
� -
< =
_
_
_
-
_
`
-
-
-
_
_
-
—
_
-
_
_
_
I3
�
1
�
.. r
�r
�i -_ I
- !
-� ' I 3 'c c c 3
__ _ -� _ _
_ _ s — _ _
I � 1 =� � _
0
_ —
'! v r
_ _
_ I _
`ri
C
O
C 9
2
1�
E
6
h �
c
o
V
c
0
� F
C
y C
a O:
O �
N
W
C
H
Q
W
W
H
Z
7
0
U
W
X
O
Z
W
a
a
Q
c
0
F
c
c
s
N
a
F
e
a
F
al
Y
7
`a
c�
0
Y
J
F
O
z
0
u
C
F
O
(Vil
N
a
O
O
o
=
_
- -
o
L
J
-
`o
o
-
_
J
o
-
6
c
F
�
-
w
-
=
S
O
_
y
O
�
C
v
a
J
F
O
z
0
u
C
F
O
(Vil
N
a
W
c
m
Q
w
z
W
O
a
ti
J
O
V
W
k
O
2
w
a
EL
Ll
APPENDIX El MUNICIPAL MEASURES
Measure
Cost
Implementation
Number
Measure Text
Effectiveness
Schedule
TRANSPORTATION & LAND USE
Install tankless and /or solar water heating at appropriate Town
High 2012 -2015
TR -1
Implement programs and provide incentives to encourage reduced
High
2012 -2015
Where technologically feasible and consistent with public safety
emissions from employee commute, including telecommuting,
standards, convert the Town's vehicle fleet to hybrid, compressed
alternative work schedules, carpooling /vanpooling, and active
natural gas, biodiesel, electric, hydrogen fuel cells or ethanol.
RE -4
transportation.
High 2012 -2015
TR -2
Provide bicycle lockers and showers at Town offices, as well as
Unknown
2015 -2020
education about bicycle commuting.
EC -1
TR -3
Provide bicycles for short trips by Town employees.
Unknown
2015 -2020
TR -4
Provide preferential parking for low - emissions vehicles at Town
Unknown
2012 -2015
EC -2
offices.
High 2015 -2020
EC -3
TR -5
Adopt a policy to limit idling in Town vehicles consistent with
High
2012 -2015
public safety standards.
for efficient use of facilities.
TR -6
Regularly maintain Town fleet vehicles to maximize efficiency (e.g.
High
2012 -2015
_
tire pressure).
GREEN BUILDING
GB -1
Encourage all new municipal buildings and facilities to meet at least
High
2012 -2015
LEED Gold certification standards.
GB-2 Utilize all available rebates and incentives for energy efficiency and Unknown 2012 -2015
distributed generation installations, such as State public good
programs (i.e. funding for energy efficiency from a 'public good"
fee on utility bills) and solar programs.
GB -3 Train all plan review and building inspection staff in green building Unknown 2012 -2015
materials, techniques, and practices.
RENEWABLE ENERGY & LOW CARBON FUELS
RE -1
Conduct a solar feasibility study and install solar panels on
High 2012 -2015
appropriate Town facilities.
RE -2
Install tankless and /or solar water heating at appropriate Town
High 2012 -2015
facilities.
RE -3
Where technologically feasible and consistent with public safety
Unknown 2012 -2015
standards, convert the Town's vehicle fleet to hybrid, compressed
natural gas, biodiesel, electric, hydrogen fuel cells or ethanol.
RE -4
Establish a fuel conservation program for the Town vehicle fleet
High 2012 -2015
and require Gas Cap driver training for all employees who use fleet
vehicles.
ENERGY CONSERVATION
EC -1
Conduct, with assistance from Pacific Gas & Electric Company, a
High 2012 -2015
thorough energy audit of all Town facilities to identify cost -
effective opportunities for conservation.
EC -2
Install reflective roofing on Town facilities.
High 2015 -2020
EC -3
Establish energy efficiency standards for Town facilities and
High 2012 -2015
provide employ -ees with guidelines, instructions, and requirements
for efficient use of facilities.
APPENDIX E; MUNICIPAL MEASURES
Measure
Cost Implementation
Number
Measure Text
Effectiveness Schedule
EC -4
Participate in peak electricity demand reduction programs and
High 2012 -2015
undertake peak demand reduction measures at Town facilities.
EC -5
As outdated electronic appliances and office equipment are phased
High 2012 -2015
out of Town facilities, replace them with energy- efficient models.
EC -6
Continue to retrofit street lights and traffic lights to light - emitting
High 2012 -2015
diodes (LED).
WATER AND WASTEWATER
WW -1
Install water - conserving fixtures in all Town facilities.
High 2012 -2015
WW-2
Use drought - tolerant native landscaping at Town facilities.
High 2012 -2015
WW-3
Use recycled water or graywater for Town landscaping, including
Unknown 2015 -2020
parks and medians, where appropriate.
SOLID WASTE
Train an existing staff member from each Town department to be a
Unknown 2012 -2015
SW -1
recycling coordinator for their department.
SW -2
Require all Town departments and facilities to reuse office supplies,
Unknown 2012 -2015
furniture, and computers before buying new materials. When
buying new materials, require Town departments and facilities to
purchase products that are made with high levels of post- consumer
recvcled content and have limited packaging.
OPEN SPACE
OS-1
Develop a Town program for maximizing carbon sequestration on
Unknown 2015 -2020
municipal property through tree planting.
PURCHASING
P -1 Develop a Town program to require or encourage the Town to Unknown 2015 -2020
hire locally for its contracts and services.
P -2 When requesting proposals or applications for contracts, Unknown 2015 -2020
professional service agreements, or grants, request that proposals or
applications include information about the sustainability practices
of the organization, and use such information as a partial basis for
proposal evaluations.
P -3 Incorporate a "life -cycle costing" approach into Town purchasing Unknown 2015 -2020
considerations that takes into account long -term cost savings from
energy- efficient products.
COMMUNICATION ACTION
CA -1 Continue to operate a townwide green business program. Unknown 2012 -2015
CA -2 Train an existing Town staff member to be a sustainability Unknown 2015 -2020
coordinator for the Town.
CA -3 Reward local businesses that hire local residents and allow Unknown 2015 -2020
telecommuting by, for example, recognition on the Town website
or in Town newsletters, or preference in Town purchasing.