2005-027 - Approving The Second Amendment To The Agreement With Cannon Design Group To Perform Services In The Development Of Residential Design Guidelines And Extending The Term Of The Agreement To June 30,2007; Authorizing The Manager To ExecuteRESOLUTION 2005 - 027
RESOLUTION OF THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF LOS GATOS APPROVING
THE SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE AGREEMENT WITH CANNON DESIGN GROUP
TO PERFORM SERVICES IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF RESIDENTIAL DESIGN
GUIDELINES AND EXTENDING THE TERM OF THE AGREEMENT TO JUNE 30,2007;
AUTHORIZING THE MANAGER TO EXECUTE THE AMENDMENT; APPROVING A
BUDGET FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF RESIDENTIAL DESIGN GUIDELINES
WHEREAS:
A. The update of the Residential Design Guidelines is part of the Advanced Planning
Work Plan of the Community Development Department.
B. The Town and the Cannon Design Group entered into an agreement for architectural
consulting services on January 23, 2002 (Agreement 02.005), which agreement was
amended June 2003 to extend the term to June 30, 2005 (Agreement 04.076), both
collectively referred to hereafter as the "Agreement."
C. The Town desires to engage the Cannon Design Group to perform consulting
services in the development of proposed Residential Design Guidelines for an
amount not to exceed $60,000.
D. The Town further desires to extend the term of the agreement with the Cannon
Design Group to June 30, 2007.
RESOLVED:
1. The Second Amendment to the Agreement with Cannon Design Group (Exhibit "A ")
is hereby approved.
2. The Town Manager is hereby directed and authorized to execute the Second
Amendment to the Agreement with Cannon Design Group.
Page 1 of 2
3. A budget for the update of the Residential Design Guidelines (Exhibit `B ") is hereby
approved.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Town Council of the Town
of Los Gatos, California held on the 18' day of April, 2005, by the following vote:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
AYES: Steve Glickman, Diane McNutt, Joe Pirzynski, Barbara Spector,
Mayor Mike Wasserman.
NAYS: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
SIGNED: A'k �aw
MAYOR OF THE TOWN OF LOS GATOS
LOS GATOS, CALIFORNIA
ATTEST:
CLERK AD . INISTRATOR OF THE TOWN OF LOS GATOS
LOS GATOS, CALIFORNIA
Page 2 of 2
CLERK DEPARTMENT
AGR
111H
SECOND AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT ORD,
REC
RESO
This SECOND AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT is entered into this day of
-1200 —, by and between the Town of Los Gatos, State of California, herein called "Town," and Cannon
Design Group, herein called "Consultant."
RECITALS
A. Town and Consultant entered into an agreement for architectural consulting services on January 23,
2002 (Agreement 02.005), which agreement was amended June 2003 to extend the term to June 30,
2005 (Agreement 04.076), both collectively referred to hereafter as the "Agreement ", copies of
which are attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein by this reference.
B. Town desires to both extend the term of the Agreement to June 30, 2007 and to amend the Scope of
Services of the Agreement to include tasks associated with the development of proposed Residential
Design Guidelines, as specified in Exhibit "B," which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by
this reference.
AMENDMENT
Paragraph 1 "Scope of Services" is hereby amended to add the tasks specified in Exhibit "B."
2. Paragraph 2 "Time of Performance" of the Agreement is hereby amended to state that the Agreement
terminates on June 30, 2007.
3. Paragraph 6 "Compensation" is amended to add the following paragraph:
Compensation for services provided in the development of proposed Residential Design
Guidelines shall not exceed $60,000.
4. All other terms and conditions of the Agreement remain in full force and effect.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Town and Consultant have executed this Agreement as of the date
indicated on page one (1).
Town of Los Gatos, by:
Debra J. Figone, Town Manager
Town of Los Gatos
ATTEST:
Town of Los Gatos, California
Marlyn Rasmussen, Clerk Administrator
Cannon Design Group
Recommended by:
Larry Cannon AIA AICP
Bud N. Lortz, Director of Community Development
Approved as to Form:
Orry P. Korb, Town Attorney
Revised: '11/04/04
N:\ )EI\CNCLRPTS\200A2nd atmndmeni to Cannon agreement.wpd
-1-
EXHIBIT A
)FFICE OF ME TOWN (,LF -RK
aGR O 'i� 0'2ZI
1HH
ORD
AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT
REC
This AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT is entered into this dayt —
and between the Town of Los Gatos, State of California, herein called "Town ", and Cannon
Design Group, herein called "Consultant."
RECITALS
A. Town and Consultant entered into an agreement for architectural consulting services on
January 23, 2002, ( "Agreement "), a copy of which is attached hereto as Attachment 1 and
incorporated herein by reference.
B. Town desires to renew the contract for period of January 24, 2003 through June 30, 2005.
AMENDMENT
1. Paragraph 2 "Time of Performance" of the Agreement is hereby amended to provide that
the term of the Agreement is January 24, 2003 through June 30, 2005.
2. All other terms and conditions of the Agreement dated January 23, 2002, remain in full
force and effect.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Town and Consultant have executed this Agreement as of
the date indicated on page one (1).
Town of Los Gatos
B y; w
Debra J. Fi ne
Town M alter ecutive Director
Date: 61
Cannon Design Group
By:
Larry Cann 6n AIA AICP
Date: �� Q 4
Department Approval
Bud N. Lortz
Director of Community Development
Date:
AtUat
Town Jerk
Los Gatos, California
C: \PROJECTS\Los•Gatos \Contract \Cannon Amendment.doc 1 EXHIBIT A
TO AMENDMENT
ATTEST:
Clerk of the Town of Los Gatos
Los Gatos, California
Mar'an o rove
Town Clerk
Approved as to Form:
P
P. Korb "
Town Attorney
Date: � z? Z'�
Date: c Z
C:\PROJECTS \Los'Gatos \Contract \Cannon Amendment,doc 2
?FFICE OF THE TOE CLERK
.aGR
AGREEMENT FOR ARCHITECTURAL CONSULTIN
ORD
THIS AGREEMENT is entered into this 2 ; day of January, 28K,..I2y and between Town
of Los Gatos, State of California, herein called "Town ", and CANNON DEWN G U P, engage`
in providing ARCHITECTURAL consulting services herein called "Consultant ". �� —S
RECITALS
A. Town is considering undertaking activities to PROVIDE ARCHITECTURAL
CONSULTING SERVICES FOR THE TOWN OF LOS GATOS.
B. Town desires to engage CANNON DESIGN GROUP to provide consulting services to
REVIEW AND CRITIQUE ARCHITECTURE FOR PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
PROJECTS; PROVIDE WRITTEN COMMENTS TO THE COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT; PROVIDE TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE ON
UPDATES OF THE TOWN'S DESIGN GUIDELINES AND ATTEND 'PUBLIC
MEETINGS AS NEEDED because of Consultant's experience and qualifications to
perform the desired work.
C. Consultant represents and affirms that it is qualified and willing to perform the desired work
pursuant to this Agreement.
AGREEMENTS
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PARTIES HERETO AGREE AS FOLLOWS:
Scope of Services Consultant shall provide the services listed in the Consultant's Scope of
Work, attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and by this reference incorporated herein, and the
services listed below.
Administrative Duties
I. When needed by Town, review and critique the architecture of addition/remodels or
new buildings that are part of.pfoposed development and redevelopment projects,
- -including .evaluation of architectural plans; site visits; consulting with project
planners, the Director of Community Development and/or design professionals as
needed; review for compliance with applicable design standards and guidelines,
specific plans and the General Plan, and submission of written comments to the
Town prior to applicable staff or DRC meetings (typically a 10 day turnaround).
II. When needed by Town, work on special studies or projects including but not limited
to: updating the Town's design standards and guidelines, preparation of a checklist
for content of architectural elevations for application packets, and assistance with
Revised: January 23, 2002 Page 1 of 8
C: \WINDOWS \TEMP \Cannon- Contract,wpd
ATTACHMENT 1
preparation/revision of hillside design guidelines.
III. When needed by Town, conduct field investigations, studies, and prepare reports
related to architectural design, and develop appropriate conditions of approval.
IV. When needed by Town, assist in the establishment and subsequent modification of
Town's design standards and guidelines, policies, and development fees.
V. When needed by Town, attend meetings with Town staff, public officials, community
leaders, developers, design professionals and the general public.
VI. When needed by Town, advise, support and assist Town departments, committees,
commissions, and Town Council. In addition, act as a liaison between Town and
Federal, State, and Regional agencies.
VII. When needed by Town, attend Town Council, Planning Commission, and special
study session meetings when architectural review processes, policies or issues or
design guidelines revisions are being considered.
VIII. As requested by Town, provide copies of draft and final draft work products of
reports and studies prepared for Town. Consultant shall provide electronic fife
copies of these documents as needed.
Other miscellaneous services
IX. Town may occasionally have the need for other services not specifically listed in this
document that the consultant has the necessary experience and capabilities to
provide. Town or Redevelopment Agency may authorize consultant to perform such
selected services on an as- needed basis.
2. Time of Performance. The services of Consultant are for a fixed one year period that will
commence upon the execution of the contract. Town retains the option with the mutual
consent of Town Manager and Consultant to renew the contract for a maximum of three
optional years. Should Town not renew a contract, the award and authorization of the
contract shall automatically expire. Town shall give Consultant at least 30 days notice, prior
to the cancellation or expiration of the contract..
Compliance with Laws Consultant shall comply with all applicable laws, codes, ordinances,
and regulations of governing federal, state and local laws. Consultant represents and
warrants to Town that it has all licenses, permits, qualifications and approvals of whatsoever
nature which are legally required for Consultant to practice its profession. Consultant
represents and warrants to Town that Consultant shall, at its sole cost and expense, keep in
effect or obtain at all times during the term of this Agreement any licenses, permits, and
approvals which are legally required for Consultant to practice its profession. Consultant
Revised: January 23, 2002 Page 2 of 8
C: \WINDOWS \TEMP \Cannon- Contract.wpd
shall maintain a Town of Los Gatos business license pursuant to Chapter 14 of the Code of
Town of Los Gatos.
4. Sole Responsibilitv Consultant shall be responsible for employing or engaging all persons
necessary to perform the services under this Agreement.
Information/Report Handling All documents furnished to Consultant by Town and all
reports and supportive data prepared by Consultant under this Agreement are Town's
property and shall be delivered to Town upon the completion of Consultant's services or at
Town's written request. All reports, information, data, and exhibits prepared or assembled
by Consultant in connection with the performance of its services pursuant to this Agreement
are confidential until released by Town to the public, and Consultant shall not make any of
the these documents or information available to any individual or organization not employed
by Consultant or Town without the written consent of Town before such release. Town
acknowledges that the reports to be prepared by Consultant pursuant to this Agreement are
for the purpose of evaluating a defined project, and Town's use of the information contained
in the reports prepared by Consultant in connection with other projects shall be solely at
Town's risk, unless Consultant expressly consents to such use in writing. Town further
agrees that it will not appropriate any methodology or technique of Consultant which is and
has been confirmed in writing by Consultant to be a trade secret of Consultant.
6.- Compensation Compensation for Consultant's professional services shall be based upon
Town approval of each task as noted in the Scole of Services Compensation for each task
shall not exceed the amount per task noted in Consultant's Schedule of Charges (attached
hereto as Exhibit "B" and incorporated by reference herein).
Billing shall be accotupanied by a detailed explanation of the work performed by whom at
what rate and on what date. Billing invoices submitted for payment must reference Town
Purchase Order Number, and if applicable, the appropriate project address and Town
Application Number (e.g. 290 Wooded View Drive /S- 00 -84). Also, plans, specifications,
documents - or other pertinent materials shall be submitted for Town review, even if only in
partial or draft form.
Payment shall be net thirty (30) days.
Only one (1) purchase order number per invoice will be accepted. All invoices. and
statements shall reference Town's purchase order number and be addressed as follows:
Invoices: Town of Los Gatos
Attn: Accounts Payable
P.O. Box 655
Los Gatos, CA 95031
Statements: Town of Los Gatos
Revised: January 23, 2002 Page 3 of 8
C'. \WINDOWS \TEMP \Cannon- Contract.wpd
Attn: Sandy Ortiz
P.O. Box 655
Los Gatos, CA 95031
7. Availabilily of Records Consultant shall maintain the records supporting this billing for not
less than three (3) years following completion of the work under this Agreement. Consultant
shall make these records available to authorized personnel of Town at Consultant's offices
during business hours upon written request of Town.
8. Project Manager The Project Manager for Consultant for the work under this Agreement
shall be Larry Cannon, AIA, AICP.
9. Assi ng_ ability and Subcontracting The services to be performed under this Agreement are
unique and personal to Consultant. No portion of these services shall be assigned or
subcontracted without the written consent of Town.
10. Notices Any notice required to be given shall be deemed to be duly and properly given if
mailed postage prepaid, and addressed to:
To Town: Bud N. Lortz
Director of Community Development
Town of Los Gatos
110 E. Main Street
Los Gatos, CA 95030
Fax: (408) 354 -7593
Phone: (408) 354 -6874
E -mail: blortz @town.los - gatos.ca.us
To Consultant: Larry Cannon AIA AICP
Cannon Design Group
180 Harbor Drive, Suite 219
Sausalito, CA 94965
Fax:` (415) 331 -3797
Phone: (415) 331 -3795
E-mail: cdgplan@pacbell.net
or personally delivered to Consultant to such address or such other address as Consultant
designates in writing to Town.
11. Independent Contractor It is understood that Consultant, in the performance of the work and
services agreed to be performed, shall act as and be an independent contractor and not an
Revised: January 23, 2002 Page 4 of S
C: \WINDOWS \TEMP \Cannon- Contract.wpd
agent or employee of Town. As an independent contractor he /she shall not obtain any rights
to retirement benefits or other benefits which accrue to Town employee(s). With prior
written consent, Consultant may perform some obligations under this Agreement by
subcontracting, but may not delegate ultimate responsibility for performance or assign or
transfer interests under this Agreement.
Consultant agrees to testify in any litigation brought regarding the subject of the work to be
performed under this Agreement. Consultant shall be compensated for its costs and expenses
in preparing for, traveling to, and testifying in such matters at its then current hourly rates of
compensation, unless such litigation is brought by Consultant or is based on allegations of
Consultant's negligent performance or wrongdoing.
12. Conflict of Interest Consultant understands that its professional responsibilities is solely to
Town. Consultant has and shall not obtain any holding or interest within Town of Los
Gatos. Consultant has no business holdings or agreements with any individual member of
Staff or management of Town or its representatives nor shall it enter into any such holdings
or agreements. In addition, Consultant warrants that it does not presently and shall not
acquire any direct or indirect interest adverse to those of Town in the subject of this
Agreement, and it shall immediately disassociate itself from such an interest should it
discover it has done so and shall, at Town's sole discretion, divest itself of such interest.
Consultant shall not knowingly and shall take reasonable steps to ensure that it does not
employ a person having such an interest in this performance of this Agreement. If after
employment of a person, Consultant discovers it has employed a person with a direct or
indirect interest that would conflict with its performance of this Agreement, Consultant shall
promptly notify Town of this employment relationship, and shall, at Town's sole discretion,
sever any such employment relationship.
13. Equal Employment Opportunity Consultant warrants that it is an equal opportunity
employer and shall comply with applicable regulations governing equal employment
opportunity. Neither Consultant nor its subcontractors do and neither shall discriminate
against persons employed or seeking employment with them on the basis of age, sex, color,
race, marital status, sexual orientation, ancestry, physical or mental disability, national origin,
religion, or medical condition, unless based upon a bona fide occupational qualification
pursuant to the California Fair Employment & Housing Act,
14. Insurance
A. Minimum Scope of Insurance:
i. Consultant agrees to have and maintain, for the duration' of the contract,
General Liability insurance policies insuring, him/her and his/her firm to an
amount not less than: one million dollars ($1,000,000) combined single limit
per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage.
Revised: January 23, 2002 Page 5 of 8
C:\WINDOWS\TEMP\Cannon-Contract.wpd
ii. Consultant agrees to have and maintain for the duration of the contract, an
Automobile Liability insurance policy ensuring him/her and his/her staff to
an amount not less than one million dollars ($1,000,000) combined single
limit per accident for bodily injury and property damage.
iii. Consultant shall provide to Town all certificates of insurance, with original
endorsements effecting coverage. Consultant agrees that all certificates and
endorsements are to be received and approved by Town before work
commences.
B. General Liability:
Town, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers are to be covered as
insured as respects: liability arising out of activities performed by or on
behalf of Consultant; products and completed operations of Consultant,
premises owned or used by Consultant. This requirement does not apply to
the professional liability insurance required for professional errors and
omissions.
ii. Consultant's insurance coverage shall be primary insurance as respects Town,
its officers, officials, employees and volunteers. Any insurance or self -
insurances maintained by Town, its officers, officials, employees or
volunteers shall be excess of Consultant's insurance and shall not contribute
with it.
iii. Any failure to comply with reporting provisions of the policies shall not
affect coverage provided to Town, its officers, officials, employees or
volunteers.
iv. Consultant's insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom
a claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the
insurer's liability.
C. = All Coverages: Each insurance policy required in this item shall be endorsed to state
that coverage shall not be suspended, voided, canceled, reduced in coverage or in
limits except after thirty (30) days' prior written notice by certified mail, return
receipt requested, has been given to Town. Current certification of such insurance
shall be kept on file at all times during the term of this agreement with Town Clerk.
D. In addition to these policies, Consultant shall .have and maintain Workers'
Compensation insurance as required by California law and shall provide evidence of
such policy to Town before beginning services under this Agreement. Further,
Revised: January 23, 2002 Page 6 of 8
C: \WINDOWS \TEMP \Cannon - Contract.wpd
Consultant shall ensure that all subcontractors employed by Consultant provide the
required - Workers' Compensation insurance for their respective employees.
15. Indemnification Consultant shall save, keep and hold harmless indemnify and defend Town
its officers, agent, employees and volunteers from all damages, liabilities, penalties, costs,
or expenses in law or equity that may at any time arise or be set up because of damages to
property or personal injury received by reason of, or in the course of performing work which
may be occasioned by a willful or negligent act or omissions of Consultant, or any of
Consultant's officers, employees, or agents or any sub - consultant.
16. Waiver No failure on the part of either party to exercise any right or remedy hereunder shall
operate as a waiver of any other right or remedy that party may have hereunder, nor does
waiver of a breach or default under this Agreement constitute a continuing waiver of a
subsequent breach of the same or any other provision of this Agreement.
17. Governing Law This Agreement, regardless of where executed, shall be governed by and
construed to the laws of the State of California. Venue for any action regarding this
Agreement shall be in the Superior Court of the County of Santa Clara.
18. Termination of Agreement Town and Consultant shall have the right to terminate thi3'
agreement with or without cause by giving not less than fifteen (15) days written notice of
termination. In the event of termination, Consultant shall deliver to Town all plans, files,
documents, reports, performed to date by Consultant. In the event of such termination, Town
shall pay Consultant an amount that bears the same ratio to the maximum contract price as
the work delivered to Town bears to completed services contemplated under this Agreement
pursuant to the noted Scope of Services and Exhibit A hereto, unless such termination is
made for cause, in which event, compensation, if any, shall be adjusted in light of the
particular facts and circumstances involved in such termination.
19. Amendment No modification, waiver, mutual termination, or amendment of this Agreement
is effective unless made in writing and signed by Town and Consultant.
20. Disputes In any dispute over any aspect of this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be
entitled to reasonable attorney's fees, 'including costs of appeal.
21. Entire'A.greement This Agreement, including Exhibits A & B, constitutes the complete and
exclusive statement of the Agreement between Town and Consultant. No terms, conditions,
understandings or agreements purporting to modify or vary this Agreement, unless hereafter
made in writing. and signed by the party to be bound, shall be binding on either party.
Revised: January 23, 2002 Page 7 of 8
C: \WINDOWS \TEMP \Cannon- Contract.wpd
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Town and Consultant have executed this Agreement as of the
date indicated on page -one (1).
Town of Los Gatos
Debra Figo To anager
Town of Los Gatos
Consultant:
Larry Cannon, AIA AICP
Cannon Design Group
ATTEST:
Clerk of Town of Los Gatos,
Los Gatos, California
Approved as to Form:
�Y-6 -
Korb, Town Attorney
Revised: January 23, 2002 Page, - 8 of 8
C: \WINDOWS \TEMP \Cannon- Contract.wpd
PROJECT APPROACH
Peer review can be a sensitive undertaking, Jokingly, I have
Suggested Approach
often likened the process to that often seen on the bumper
The following approach is one that has seemed to work
sticker:
Never try to teach a pig how to sing - it is a waste of your time and
we1L
1. An initial meeting including the architectural consult -
it annoys the pig.
ant, Town staff, the applicant and their design pro -
While design review can often be challenging, it is, of
fessionals to discuss the site, program and initial de-
oncepts.
sign c n
course, never a waste of time. It does, however, have the po-
c
This optional step and depends on the complexity of the
tential to annoy a number of people including applicants, their
design professionals, and neighbors of projects who are un-
project and the sensitivity of the project in its nughborhood
able to achieve all of the mitigation measures or design changes
context
they might desire. In addition, applicants are frequently re-
2. A reconnaissance of the site and, where appropriate,
spected members of the community with a long history in the
assembly of contextual photographs.
' Town's growth and change.
This may also be an optional task- In Cupertino, I visit the
The challenge is in working in a respectful and non - judge-
site only for very rensitive projects, orfor sites that have unique
mental way on each project to achieve the best result possible
characteristics.
for the Town while accommodating as much as possible the
3. A discussion between staff and the architectural con -
applicant's reasonable goals. This requires some careful listen-
sultant to identify any special issues or concerns.
ing, mutual respect for a variety of opinions, and a commit-
4. Preliminary review of the project with a summary
meat to seek fresh solutions.
letter to staff identifying planning and design issues.
The problems that show up most frequently include the
When appropriate, I prepare overlay diagrams to sug-
following.
gest one or more alternative approaches to resolving
• Land prices that require more development on a par-
individual concerns. I try to limit these to conceptual
cel than is consistent with the scale of the surround-
ideas, but in some cases, my city clients have asked
ing area.
for more specific recommendations when there is
• Residential applicants determined to build as large a
doubt concerning the architect's ability or commit-
home as possible for resale value.
meat to deliver a satisfactory solution.
• Applicants who put a lot of time, emotional energy,
Some exampler of these review letters follow this page.
and dollars into a project design before getting ad-
5. The next step is variably Normally, staff forwards
equate feedback from the staff and from the review
the letter along with any additional comments to the
and approval bodies.
applicant for review and revisions to the design.
• Developers who do not allow their design profes-
Sometimes it has been appropriate to have a meet -
sionals an•opporturiity to explore an adequate num-
ing /work session with the applicant to discuss the.
ber o "f planning and design approaches to difficult
concerns and perhaps reach some preliminary agree-
sites.
meat as to direction.
• Design professionals who lock into a design very early,
6. In many cases, my clients have instructed the
and have a difficult time in putting any fresh thought
applicant's architect, with the applicant's concurrence,
into potential alternative solutions.
to work directly with me to resolve design issues and
" Planning and design approaches that optimize inter -
find acceptable solutions. This has been done through
nil function, economic return, or owner desires, but
fax exchange of drawings, telephone conversations
that fail to adequately take into account the context
and direct meetings where necessary. In all cases, I
of the site and the expectations of the immediate
have kept the city staff informed. This is up to the
neighbors and the community at large.
Town, and is obviously a matter of city staff and
their planning commissions developing a level of trust
" The approach to peer review differs in each community
in which CDG provides those services. In some, reviews are
in my judgement, but when it has been utilized it has
substantially reduced the number of meetings and
..
made and advice given to staff with infrequent or no contact
design iterations.
with the applicant. In others, CDG is charged with the
responsiblity of resolving all design issues before the project
will be scheduled for hearing.
Exhibit A
- Cannon Design Group 180 Harbor Drive Suite 219 Sausalito, California 415.331 -3795
ESTIMATED HOURS AND FEES
Hours and fees for similar CDG services in other com-
munities have varied widely, and depend on the complexity of
the project, the skill of the applicant's design professionals,
and the willingness of the applicant to work cooperatively with
the Town.
Recent review assignments have ranged from less than
$500 to around $5,500. Most that involve site reconnaissance
and meetings with applicants have been between $1,500 and
$2,500, Projects above the $3,000 level have usually been ones
in which the applicant's design professionals have not ad-
equately responded to comments in the view of staff or the
Planning Commission. These have required additional meet-
ings and, in some cases, the preparation of suggested design
changes in graphic form.
CDG charges $120 per hour for Larry Cannon's time plus
expenses at cost plus 15 %.
A typical meeting would cost about $500 including travel
time and expenses.
The following is what I would believe to be a reasonable
budget, including travel time and expenses, for a project re-
gti}iriring some significant review.
1. Preliminary submittal familiarity review
2. Site reconnaissance, meeting with applicant,
and discussion with staff
3. Preliminary review and summary letter
4. Follow up meeting with staff and applicant
(Optdona!
1 hour $ 120.00
4 hours $ 480.00
4 hours ; 480.00
4 hours ; 480.00
5. Resubmittal review and letter 2 hours $ 240.00
6. Attendance at one public meeting 4 hours S 480.00
(Optdoira9
Personnel fotals 16 hours $ 2,280.00
F,'x2enses S 135.00
Estimated Total $ 2,415.00
Ertimated Total exelu&ng optional itemu 11,355.00
- -(1 trip for rite reconnaivance)
Cannon Design Group 180 Harbor Drive Suite 219 Sausalito, California 415.331-3795
Residential Design Guidelines
Work Scope Outline
March 31, 2005
1. CURRENT CONDITIONS EVALUATION
1.1 Existing Town Standards and Guidelines Review
• General Plan
• Residential Design Guidelines
• Pre -1941 Design Guidelines
• Almond Grove Historic District Ordinance
• Broadway Historic District Ordinance
• Edelen- University Avenue Historic District Ordinance
• Fairview Plaza Historic District Ordinance
Individual LHP properties Ordinance
1.2 Key Neighborhoods Identification
• Staff reconnaissance
• Key neighborhoods characteristics descriptions
1.3 Photographic Inventory
• Staff reconnaissance
• Photographic inventory of neighborhood, site planning and structures
1.4 Planning and Design Characteristics Identification
• Written and graphic summary including:
- Setbacks
- Parking
- Front setback paving and landscaping
- Architectural Styles
- Building heights and massing
- Home entries
Door and window types
Accessory structures
Materials and colors
Architectural details
1.5 Common Problems Identification
• Written and graphic summary based on photographic inventory and past specific project
review experience
1.6 Issues Identification
• Written and graphic summary including:
- Definition of a neighborhood and neighborhood compatibility
- Criteria of excellence in design.
- Architectural styles and elements
- Energy conservation building techniques (e.g. thermal glazing, passive and active
1
EXHIBIT B
TO AMENDMENT
Residential Design Guidelines
Scope of Work
March 31, 2005
heating and cooling
- Building setbacks, colors, materials, and architectural styles
- Chimneys/cantilevered chimneys
- Privacy
- Use of architectural copper (nonpoint source concerns)
- When are second story additions appropriate?
- Pavement in front setback (e.g, circular driveways)
- When is it appropriate to require street frontage improvements?
- Walls, fences, arbors and other landscape features
- Exterior lighting
- Garages and detached accessory structures
- Determination on when architectural review is required for additions and
modifications
- Streamlining of review process and special design guidelines for historic structures
- Reevaluate Community Development Policy regarding additions to residences within
one year of occupancy for a residence that was granted Architecture and Site
approval.
- Reevaluate attic policy regarding upgrading an attic space to accommodate a future
second story.
1.7 Historic Districts Classifications Confirmation
• Definitions for:
- Historic Structures
- Contributing Structures
- Non - Contributing Structures
• HPC Reconnaissance of current classifications in the Historic Districts
1.8 HPC /Staff Field Reconnaissance
• Common Problems and Key Issues Identification
2. DESIGN GUIDELINES FRAMEWORK
2.1 Basic Planning and Design Principles Identification (General "own -wide)
• Community Expectations
• Neighborhood Compatibility
• Site Planning
• Architectural
• Landscaping
• Energy Conservation and Sustainability
2.2 Principles Identification Unique to Specific Neighborhoods and Historic Districts
• Neighborhood Compatibility
• Site Planning
2
Residential Design Guidelines
Scope of Work
March 31, 2005
• Architectural
• Landscaping
2.3 Major Design Guidelines
• Site Planning
• Architectural
Landscaping
• Other
2.4 Design Guidelines Document Organization and Format
• Table of Contents
• Extent of guidelines
• Graphics types
3. PRELIMINARY DESIGN GUIDELINES
3.1 Expanded Design Guidelines
• Site Planning
• Parking
• Landscaping
• Privacy
• Building Form and Massing
• Second Floor Additions
• Accessory and Second Unit Structures
• Doors and Windows
• Materials and Colors
• Architectural Details
• Energy Conservation and Sustainability
3.2 Community Outreach
• Public meeting(s) to present and discuss Preliminary Design Guidelines
• Focus meeting(s) to address concerns of special groups
3.3 Expanded Design Guidelines Refinement
• Detailed design guidelines and graphics for:
- Site Planning
- Architectural
- Landscaping
- Other
4. DESIGN GUIDELINES DRAFT DOCUMENT
4.1 Administrative Draft Design Guidelines
3
Residential Design Guidelines
Scope of Work
March 31, 2005
4.2 Administrative Draft #2 Design Guidelines
4.3 Public Review Draft Design Guidelines
5. PUBLIC REVIEW AND ADOPTION
5.1 Planning Commission Public Hearing(s)
5.2 Town Council Public Hearing(s)
5.3 Final Design Guidelines
MEETINGS
GENERAL PLAN COMMITTEE MEETINGS
Meeting #1
1. Scope of Work discussion
2. General discussion of neighborhoods and issues
3. Discussion of Current Guidelines
Meeting #2
1. Town Existing Standards and Guidelines discussion
2. Key neighborhoods discussion
3. Common Problems Discussion
Meeting #3
1. Issues identification
Meeting #4
1. Community Expectations discussion
2. Basic Planning and Principles discussion
Meeting #5
1. Major Design Guidelines review and discussion
2. Design Guidelines Document Organization and Format discussion
Meeting #6
1. Expanded Design Guidelines discussion
Meeting #7
1. Expanded Design Guidelines discussion
E
Residential Design Guidelines
Scope of Work
March 31, 2005
Meeting #8
1. Community Input discussion
2. Refined Design Guidelines discussion
Meeting #9
1. Administrative Draft Design Guidelines discussion
Meeting #10
1. Administrative Draft #2 Design Guidelines discussion
Meeting #11
1. Public Review Draft Design Guidelines discussion and recommendations to Planning
Commission
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMITTEE MEETINGS
Meeting #1
1. Scope of Work discussion
2. Discussion of Current Historic Districts and District Ordinances and Guidelines
3. Common Problems Discussion
4. Scheduling of walking tour reconnaissance for HPC and staff
Meeting #2
1. Contributing and Non - contributing Structures discussion
2. Special Issues Discussion to include:
• Contributing historic structures
• Noncontributing historic structures
• Relocation of identified contributing structures Historic District Ordinances to the
Design Guidelines.
• Reevaluate if contributing structures are still applicable.
• Bay windows (different types and when are they appropriate)
• Porch enclosures and other porch alterations
• Skylights
• Are garden windows appropriate?
• More defined building materials and when their use is appropriate (brick colors and types,
types of cultured stone, clad windows, etc)
• . •Sunrooms
• Existing historic walls and fences
• Proposed walls /fences
• Arbors and porte cocheres
• Garage door styles and material
• Solar panels for sites that have an individual LHP overlay zone, or.are a contributor to an
historic district
5
Residential Design Guidelines
Scope of Work
March 31, 2005
Meeting #3
1. Continuation of Special Issues discussion
Meeting #4
1. Community Expectations discussion
2. Basic Planning and Design Principles discussion
Meeting #5
1. Major Design Guidelines review and discussion
2. Design Guidelines Organization and format discussion
Meeting #6
1. Expanded Design Guidelines discussion
Meeting #7
1. Expanded Design Guidelines discussion
Meeting #8
1. Community Input discussion
2. Expanded Design Guidelines discussion
Meeting #9
1. Administrative Draft Design Guidelines discussion
Meeting #10
1. Administrative Draft #2 Design Guidelines discussion
Meeting #11
1. Public Review Draft Design Guidelines discussion and recommendations to Planning
Commission
N:\DEV\SANDY\resguidelines\scope. l . wpd
0
cn
W
Z
J
W
D
7
Z
W
J
a
F-
Z
W
0
N
W
O
Q to
Ur o
fn Q
o
C
O
N
69
EXHIBIT B
TO RESOLUTION
00
t
r
40
O
O
O
ti
co
V
0o
V)
O
ti
O
ti11
t`7
to
V'O70)N
0
0
tq
0
MC'M-1
CO
p
N
OOp
N
d'
00
d' rnrnrnrnrnty
N1�td•N
OOpp
rrN
63
^
69
63
64
n
N
N
1
r
r
nj
to
63
64
tq
tq
63
64
tq
to
60
tq
to
O
O)
. - - CO
co
O
CO
O
—
O)
ty
to
64
0
O
N
co
Lo
co
co
t0
N
N
N
�}
e!
00
N
63
63
63
EA
63
CA
V
64
63
6%
64
6g3
^
63
63
tq
%
69
69
co
C
N
N
C
C
d
CO
CO
O W
0
O
N
t
6)
O)
O
O)
M
C4
N
'IT
d
N
cc
cc
O
C l
-
M
CA
63
�
—
69
63
t.�
63
63
63
r
N
N
yj
—
N
to
64
6
64
69
W.
6q.
69
69
6%
r
ow
"t
co
CO
(D
O
c0
p
N
d•
d•
p
d'
It
00
O
O)
00
w
r
c
O
�
N
U
n.
L
•i9
o '
C
O
.
O
N
M
@
m
a
a
E
O
O
Q
>
a)
m
c
y
�
o
C
O
o
d
J
N
Q)
O
i
p
C
j
C
•C
W
c
U
U
v
o
N
C7
cn
v)
�
O
C
C•
Z
p
C�
L
U
C
0
!=
rn
U
c
y
a�
m
H
c
c
-a
E
E
..
>>
cn
z
c
c
U)
.�
p�
O
c
c_
h
z
o
+�+
s
U
•p
o c4
�
. t 0 - 0
o
y
o
N
LL.
c
c
y
c
c�
J.
Z
c
X2
Lu
U) c )
o
'c
E
O
L
M
O
d
N.
41
y
4.
d
d.
�'.
U
f - 1n.F0
N
2
2(n
CL
M
=
0.
U)
EXHIBIT B
TO RESOLUTION
M
O
m
0
n
N
N
Hill
11111
11111
1.
00
6N
V
(D
000000
CD
h
N
M
to
h
a
0
cn
N
ty
N
C
�
h
00
N
N
n
IA
H).
tH
t,
C
N
ti!
0)
-e
C
17
co
N
h
O
00
1
to
e
0q1
tR
V)
to
N
ow
tfj
69
tR
6440
6f!
of
tq
–
64
tV
to
vw
�:
N
V!
fA
69.
69
b4
CD
fA.
d'
O
to
of
ty
r
to
tb
Cf)
O
r
O
0)
O
co
V)
O
–
tp
p,
O
–
O
–
to
64
M'
�l'
00
to
00
CO
O
–
to
69
�--
64
N
ti
M
69
64
EA
64
64
69
64
69.
64
64
tq
64
69
tq
64
tq
N
kti
to
0000
0)
O
p
O
0)
O
O
N
p
00
M
p
t11
O
i
O.
m
p
O
o°Dprnp
d
co
0
0
I't
^
00
0)i
r
64
64
0)i
0
N
69
p
�"
o
N
r
64
64
69
CV
69
ttj
h
64
69
64
nj
.-
69
nj
64
64
69
F
r
64
64
64
tED
4111.
EA
to
64
r
,I
00
00
I
trs
00
00
00
N
00
00
CD
OD
d'
Ct7
(D
CO
M
CO
Im
0)
Co
to
n
N
n
U)
N
CD
N
C
C
N
N
f0
tr
a)
a
w
O
0
Q
C
O
a
O
w
a
:tl
�+
(L
LL_
y
y
�
'
00
a
a
ti
C
.
.p
m
c
w
o .
y
G
m
=
y
L
CL
Y
Q•
U)
n
L
%:z
p
O
`
�
y
c
c
O
N
,Q)
E
.,
o
Z
@
N
C
C
U
E
1=
c
c
C
.
0
0
to
w.
E
u
( D
LL'
'.0
'N
fnJ
N
l]
C
C
+C
@
CU
C
w
C
d
w
O
Q
O
C
L
Q
U
O.
d
N
�
•U)
�
U) LM
Z
v
*
=
(n
O
@@
a�
O
E
E
)
U)
c
y
:3
C
V'
N
C:
c
v,
c
N
.-
w0
p(D
U)
to
n
7
Z
U
U
U
y
4)
to
N
.O
U_
U)
C
C
=
C
C
d
o
._
N
N
-o
._
O
C
C
(=
,h
C
C_
J
to
to
C@
n
N
(�
3
0
0
C)
o•
N
N
O
N
N
E�
a)
>ci
3
Ea
o�
c
>
7
c���.Cgc
c
N w
c
O
y
�'C)
0,-m
C
N
Ooow
N@
0
UUai
to
U)
UUm
to
O
m
w
o
O
0
@
m
'C
a
@
2
N
0
0)
0
=_
.O
T
==
•y
Ut
=
U'
_
Z
M
O
0
Hill
11111
11111
1.
00
N
V
(D
Cry
p
le
M.
h
a
to
N
to
00
N
at
IA
H).
tH
t,
C
N
ti!
OW
C
17
co
h
O
00
to
0q1
to
toll
64
69
6f!
tq
r
to
CD
fA.
d'
O
O
.
of
ty
tb
Cf)
O
r
(T
•--
^
CO
O
lf)
tb
M
tD
o1
N
N
d'
�.
M
00
to
69
69
69
69
V,
69
69
64
tq
64
69
tq
69.
69
tf}
m
kti
to
O�oNp
0
t11
o
M.
o°Dprnp
co
O
�
00
00
, zt
64
64
69
tp
N
69
64
�"
N
r
!}
r
64
V.
h
64
69
64
tq
64
64
64
64
trs
O
(O
d'
a0
00
d'
Ct7
tp
CO
p
V
0)
Co
to
n
CD
�!
r
U)
C
N
N
f0
O
C
O
O
w
:tl
�
'
a
a
.
.p
m
c
w
o .
E
E
E
1=
c
c
0
0
to
w.
E
u
( D
to
C
c
-0
c
Z
@
@
CU
C
,
N
C
d
0
'
w
�
•U)
�
U) LM
v
v
o
)
U)
V'
N
C:
c
C
c
C
.
U)
p(D
U)
to
n
Z
'�
@
@
4)
U_
U_
C
C
C
O
o
._
c
-o
._
O
`
'
`
N
,h
a)
to
to
w p
v�
3
�
o•
op
O
N
E
N
E�
a)
>
a)
>ci
3
c
>
7
c
N w
c
y
N
C
N
N@
0
w
to
U)
.p
to
O
C
Z
�
h
3=
'C
j.
N
N
y
a
Q)
y
:EEC.
c�co
V
N
@
N
@
O
a
w00w(D
w
=w=
(D_�
(D
_�
ai
m
rN
�o
h
MLO
co
O
�t
00
000
0(
w
L6
M
N
0
N
CA
o
N
T
M
6.1�
6--
T
vl�
W
�
69
V►
IA
tp
O
LO
tiI�
G
00
h
N
M
00
rt
c
tl'
O
m
O
p�
M
M
ti
d'
(LON
G%D.
K?
M
IA
(A
(,q
r•
Q'
bq
fR
69
to
to
69
64
T
vw
a
LO
x
w
lR
(D
d'
d'
M
M
00
co
O
—
CO
000
M
D)
00
o0o
h
1�•
!r
000
M
�
69
(f?
ER
Efl
EA
69.
6q
EF)
6
y
(OD
yq
(
N
(
�
r
N
W)
co
NO
M
056
MN
46
4%
r
Efl
64
M•
4 00 9
603
6q
64W
V
ffl•
(D
0oop
ti
O
0
CO
0C)
G
o0p
0)
0)
o0o
M
M
c
ti:
O CD
ti
LO
0
C\
co
d
N
E
N
N
CO
'I
el).
T
ER
^
T
6p>
(y
64
6q
N
(fl
Ef3
bq
r
C6
6
64
7
60
O
U)
2
to
O
(D
O
00
(D
'd'
p
00
00
(p
y
M
M
(p
w
Q
R
a+
0
+
H
0)
y
@
N
d
�
�
N
w
~
C
C
• d
C
�
v7
�
�
C
O
yr
C
E
E
N
E
a
CL
a
d
C
-
C
'
+
Qp
c
�� '
c�
c
7
C
a)
c
0
a
c
m
C
'y
S
'�
O
O
o.S
•�
d'
0
c
c
(D
E
C
C
d
d
D y
0)
Cl
.'
U)
y
N
O
L7
U
j
C
C
LL
L a
c:
.�
c
0
r,
d
c
.�
O
o
C
d
w
fn
C
N
a)
Q
O
y
N
N
(n
u)
Q
w
Z
0
'-
�*
0
*'
d
a)
EEC
a)
w
a)
O
O
N
O
w
ro�
0>
@�
�
0
L.
0
C
0)
!9
�'
m
' to
, 0
H
r
r'
w
7
cc
_y
d
"
L
O
d
(7
=
2
C
C
�
�•
c
u
w
U)
V)
.a
U)
U)
Q
C�2�
cn
•�
.�
why
c
3
c
c
O
c
c
C
E2
a)
a)
�
E
>
�
N
y
a)
1: 11 ,
�
0
cn
J
Z
c?
�_
�:�
a)
a
a
a
i
a
a
E
E
E
fl
UU
d
UU
d
m
w
'0
0
O
d.
n.
D..
.y
(L
CL
d
n.
d
0)
O.
o
<0
<0-
=
=T
(D
=
Z
(D_Z
m
rN
MLO
co
O
�t
00
000
0(
w
L6
M
N
0
N
Q
OA
o
N
T
M
6.1�
6--
T
vl�
W
�
69
V►
IA
df
O
M
e!'
Cl)
rt
h
to
O
Y9
co
ti
(LON
.
M
EA
bq
fR
69
Efl
to
69
T
vw
a
x
w
000
o0o
000
co
M
to
(OD
(
(
�
N
W)
co
NO
M
056
MN
46
Efl
64
M•
4 00 9
603
6q
64W
V
to
ti
LO
CO
co
N
N
N
a
Cl)
N
7
O
2
y
R
a+
H
0)
y
@
N
d
N
d
N
r
~
C
C
• d
C
�
�
C
C
(�
N
C
d
C
-
C
'
Qp
c
�� '
c�
c
0
a
c
m
C
'y
N
c
d'
c
u)
u
C
d
d
D y
0)
Cl
.'
U)
y
N
d
U
N
O
N
O
N
!9
N
�_
, 0
H
�
w.
7
L
O
d
(7
=
2
C
C
C_
Q
C�2�
why
C
-)
Q
a)
d
E
N
d
a)
1: 11 ,
N
0
cn
• E
,E
a)
m
N
Ln
Z
C
is
F
y
'S Z
v�
>
N
F-
V
N
. c
V
y
LL
Z
C
d •�
N
Q
O
C .�
�v
.W W
CG O
m
('J LL
_
_
(7 m
V p
o .�
c `o
oo
Q .`
'�
c a` m
m
V
o Z,
'5
d
B
J ¢
U
'= m
=
c
CG
a w
m
m p
a 0
0 .o
U T
U o
� E '
2 �?
N
o� w
p
a Q
c
�°
N
m .>
o
o a
c 8 `o
c d
m p
L' 0
G
m 'o c
C
FL a
a 2
F-a
t-¢
��
=
DOS
o g
ro
E
N.
0
V—'
•� y
m%
CC
°C
-
o
>
c
o a
u 0
2
N E
n a
a
C
F(7
Y:
d 5
2U
U
D:2
vJ
LLJ
Z C w
W C
SU
cn'2
N
F
Fes-
Cc
W
.li Y
Q
N �n
C
N to
C1 C
N N
C1 C
a`
Q
'
E
N E
Q,O
c
°'d
a
a)
c ro
E•
p
c
o'er'
Z
N
C.7
N
c c
a o. o
O
'O N C
V
oC
L~L
,9
E 'm
¢O
t
E 'S
Ua
E'
Q0
a '�
CL0
m
=
M
a e a a cli
�C'3 �
pp
�!' 0 C7 �
V
C
a�
SD 2 0
w
p E o
n o
y.�m
CO
�2
n
.� o
o. .
p
(JLiS
U
c u �
> c
F °
U♦
c
q �E
_av■
p r 4
a • O a � O
d�
v C O
�co
U
U � �
a�
x �
a •
x �
V
0. • �
v
a
C7 �
0. •
V
C O
U
v
� � N
• r � • r
Ln
Z
C
is
F
y
Y
C
v�
LLU
Q
O
V
y
LL
Z
C
d •�
N
Q
O
C .�
�v
:C
N
10 -p
E
_
a o
WZ
N (7
d
B
�r r
d
N
E
~
N C7
? a
N N
m
m
E d
U
E
d
p-
N
O_
O
2 �?
in
o� w
p
wo
Ucr
a 10 c
UO wC
Z
: (6 a)
T
m p
L' 0
c
=o war
C
<Nj
-I--�
O
N ,�
z
o g
ro
E
N.
0
V—'
•� y
m%
CC
°C
-
o
>
c
o a
u 0
2
N E
n a
a
C
F(7
Y:
d 5
2U
U
D:2
SU
cn'2
ME
W
.li Y
a`
.a
�
a`
�
p
Q,O
c
°'d
a
a)
c ro
E•
p
c
o'er'
c c ro
E
C.7
c
c c
a o. o
o�
a o
cLL
V
oC
c c
rn
�. o
c c�
Z �
o
m
c
N °
2 c
�C'3 �
� (n
�!' 0 C7 �
V
C
a�
w
p E o
n o
y.�m
o�
�2
n
.� o
o. .
p
(JLiS
m
dZ)Z
�(7
Oin
=
m '
�0 Din
M
U
c u �
> c
F °
U♦
c
q �E
_av■
p r 4
a • O a � O
d�
v C O
�co
U
U � �
a�
x �
a •
x �
V
0. • �
v
a
C7 �
0. •
V
C O
U
v
� � N
• r � • r
Ln
Z
is
c
v�
O
•r.r
Q � e
�-
0
N
E
CD
aci
N
E
~
o
m
OQ
V=
F• ¢
a
W CC
"DC N
°
o
-
d
p-
N
ai
d O
O
p U
in
y p
0
��
Z
: (6 a)
—
pl
N
d
�'
C
<Nj
-I--�
O
N ,�
z
o g
ro
E
N.
0
V—'
•� y
m%
CC
°C
-
o
>
c
o a
u 0
2
N E
n a
a
C
F(7
Y:
d 5
2U
U
D:2
SU
cn'2
ME
U
c u �
> c
F °
U♦
c
q �E
_av■
p r 4
a • O a � O
d�
v C O
�co
U
U � �
a�
x �
a •
x �
V
0. • �
v
a
C7 �
0. •
V
C O
U
v
� � N
• r � • r
ATTACHMENT 2
is
•r.r
Q � e
ATTACHMENT 2