Loading...
9 - Att 4evle,. TOWN OF LOS GATOS PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Meeting Date: August 24, 2011 PREPARED BY: APPLICATION NO.: LOCATION: APPLICANT/ PROPERTY OWNER: CONTACT PERSON: APPLICATION SUMMARY: EXHIBITS: REMARKS: Marni F. Moseley, Associate Planner, AICP mmoseley@losgatosca.gov ITEM NO: 1 DESK ITEM Architecture and Site Application S-11-001 16161 Short Road (West side of Short Road, accessed from a driveway approximately 350 ft. south of Old Blossom Hill Road) John and Elvie Scott Benjamin Guilardi Requesting approval to demolish an existing single family residence and to construct a new single family residence on property zoned R-1:20. APN 523-09-029. 1-22. Previously Submitted 23. Letter from applicant, received August 22, 2011 (five pages) 24. Letter from Logan and Powell LLP (120 Mary Way), received August 23, 2011 (20 pages) 25. Letter from Greg Shean (112 Mary Way), received August 24, 2011 (one page) 26. Letter from Matteoni, O'Laughlin and Hechtman (16171 Short Rd), received August 24, 2011 (five pages) 27. Response letter from applicant, received August 24, 2011 (two pages) Staff received additional letters after the distribution of the staff report. In addition, the applicant has submitted additional letters and information to further discuss why a single story design was not feasible for the property, and to respond to the letter submitted by Logan and Powell LLP. Prepared by: Marni F. Moseley, AICP Associate Planner iz)71-4 WRR:MM:ah N:\DEV\PC REPORTS \2011\16161 Short-desk-2.doc Approved by: Wendie L. Rooney Director of Community Development ATTACHMENT 4 This Page Intentionally Left Blank 2 2 2011 August 22,2011 T \:NP-.! OF LOS GATOS PLANNING DIVISION Marni, In another attempt to better explain the revisions made to plans for the submission to 8/24/11 Planning Commission meeting, the Scott's wish for you to include the enclosed in the package: 1. The comparison drawing on revised plans and view corridor. 2. a photo showing the views of the hills taken from next to new location of story poles -the best we can do from our side showing what Mallison's view corridor will be. The elevation of photo taken is approx. 18 feet above ground -Similar to Mallison's 2nd floor viewing elevation. 3. A section showing the site line from 120 Mary Way to proposed Scott's residence. 4. A photo showing 120 Mary Way, Malison's residence behind the Cypress hedge line. The elevation of photo taken is approx. 18 feet above ground level, Please note on the section drawing. There may be about 3 to 4 vertical feet of Scott's residence, 60 feet away and only a 37 wide potion visible to Malison's on top of their hedges from their second story balcony. This is not considering the trees much taller to block more of the site lines. The Mallison's have already isolated themselves in privacy by their own choice in landscaping. Scott's have done their best to respect the same. Thank you. John and Elvie Scott 0l COMPARISON OF PREVIOUS AND REVISED DESIGN CD I . LOGAN & POWELL LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW Roberti. Logan, of Counsel 16450 Los Gatos Blvd., Suite 110 • Los Gatos, CA 95032 • Telephone (408) 402-9542 • Fax (408) 402.8441 • E-mail: info®loganpowell.com Honorable Chairperson and Planning Commissioners Planning Commission Town of Los Gatos 110 E. Main Street Los Gatos, CA 95030 RE: S-11-001- 16161 'Short Road Dear Honorable Chairperson and Planning Commissioners: This letter is submitted on behalf of Bob and Lois Mallison (collectively referred to.as the "Mallisons"). On June 22, 2011, a letter in opposition to this project was submitted to you and is incorporated into this letter for your reference. At the June 22, 2011, meeting, this Planning Commission directed the applicant to revise the project to be more conforming with the neighborhood. A majority of this Commission indicated a smaller one-story home may be more appropriate for the difficult lot. Although the applicants have made minor changes to the design in an attempt to appease this Commission, the changes result in an insignificant re -design. Therefore, the majority of the arguments' made in our June 22, 2011, letter still apply. Due to this unusual configuration, the project still has significant visual and privacy impacts on the surrounding neighbors that should not be ignored. The property is approximately 300 feet long but only 70 feet wide. The property is sandwiched between three (3) properties on Short Road and five (5) properties on Mary Way. The property is accessed via an easement over a neighboring property on Short Road. As designed, the side yards of the lot will abut the backyards of the properties on Short Road and Mary Way. A slight square footage reduction and an increase in the setbacks do not change the fact that this property cannot accommodate a home of this size and design. The project is still much too bulky and massive for this challenged property. Mallison/Corr/2PC-Itr8.23,11 August 23, 2011 RECEIVE AU G 2 2011 TOWN OF LOS GATOS PLANNING DIVISION EXHIBIT 24 Honorable Chairperson and Planning Commission RE: S-11-001-16161 Short Road August 23, 2011 Page 2 of 3 THIS PROJECT AS AMENDED REMAINS CONTRARY TO THE TOWN'S RESIDENTIAL DESIGN GUIDELINES ("GUIDELINES") AND SHOULD NOT BE APPROVED. The purpose of the Guidelines is to "ensure that development is compatible with its surrounding neighborhood." This project still fails to comply with the Guidelines. One overarching principle of the Guidelines is that "Homes will be designed with respect for the views, privacy and solar access of the neighbors." Guidelines 1.4. Although the design has been slightly modified to attempt to address the issues raised by the Mallisons, the Mallisons' view from their backyard and decks will still be dominated by the proposed project This impact is only exacerbated by the grade differential of the properties (the Mailison property is approximately 4.5 feet lower that the project site). Even with the slight size reduction to the second story, when standing on the Mallisons' deck or in their bedrooms, the imposing structure will still be looming over the Mallisons and adversely impact their property. To address this impact, the applicants appear to be relying on the landscaping that is located on the Mallisons' property rather than acknowledging that a two-story structure is not appropriate on this narrow lot. This reliance is misplaced and cannot mitigate the impacts of this project. The cypress trees that line the side and back property lines of the Mailison property were installed by the prior owner of the property over 40 years ago. Unfortunately, the cypress trees are in declining health and several trees have been lost. It is highly likely that the trees will die over time. In addition, the existing trees on the Mailison property are seasonal trees which lose their leaves; therefore, the trees on the northeast will not mitigate the impacts of this structure. The master bathroom window appears to still be at a height of approximately 5 feet. This window should also be raised to 6 feet and glazed so as to protect the privacy of the Mallisons and the Scotts. Residential Design Guidelines 3.11.2 addresses privacy intrusions on adjacent residents. It provides "Windows should be places to minimize views into the living spaces and yard spaces near neighboring homes. Where possible, second floor windows that might intrude on adjacent property' should have sill heights above eye level or have frosted or textured glass to reduce visual impacts." Guidelines 2.5.2 specifically requires applicants to design with sensitivity to adjacent neighbors. "Existing views are not protected as a right. Neverthe- less, additions to existing homes and new houses should be planned with an awareness of the impacts which they will have on the views, sky exposure, sun access and privacy of neighbors." Guidelines 2.5.2. This project was not planned with an awareness of the impacts it would have on the Mallisons. In Mallison/Corr/2PC-Itr8.23.11 Honorable Chairperson and Planning Commission RE: S-11-001-16161 Short Road August 23, 2011 Page 3 of 3 fact, the applicants have ignored the impacts on the Mallisons. The applicants only tried to address the impacts on the Mallisons after this Commission continued the item on June 22, 2011. The minor modifications that the applicants are presenting now do little to reduce the impacts on the Mallisons. The Mallisons are still faced with an imposing structure looming over their back yard. The Mallisons are still losing their view of the hillsides. The second story is still squarely in the middle of the Mallisons' property and will eliminate the quiet enjoyment of their backyard. THE PROJECT SHOULD BE REDESIGNED AS A SINGLE STORY STRUCTURE TO REDUCE THE IMPACTS ON THE NEIGHBORHOOD AND COMPLY WITH THE GUIDELINES. As members of this Commission stated on June 22, 2011, this is an unusual lot which creates significant impacts on the surrounding properties. Due to the narrowness of the lot, this project is still too large. Although the project may meet the technical regulations of the Town Zoning Code, it is not appropriate for this lot and is inconsistent with the Guidelines. The applicant argues that the home cannot be built as a single storyhome because of "increased impervious coverage which would eliminate area to be used for a pool and outdoor enjoyment." However, the installation of a pool would also increase the impervious coverage on the lot. The loss of area for a pool or outdoor enjoyment is only caused by the desire to build a very large home on a very narrow lot. If the house size was reduced, there would be more outdoor area. This lot is uniquely shaped and uniquely located and therefore, may not be able to accommodate all of the desires of the owners. The project should be designed to fit the lot and the surrounding neighborhood Which requires it to be a single story structure. CONCLUSION For these reasons, the project as proposed should not be approved. Thank you for your consideration. Very truly yoLirs, • Kirsten M. Powell cc: client enclosures Mallison/Corr/2PC-Itr8.23.11 LOGAN & POWELL LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW Robed J. Logan, Of Counsel 16450 Los Oates Blvd., Suit 110 * Los Cats, CA 95032 • Telephone (408) 402-9542 Fax (408) 402-8441 Info©loganpowell.conn June 22, 2011 Honorable Chairperson and Planning Commissioners Planning Commission Town of Los Gatos 110 E. Main Street Los Gatos, CA 95030 • RE: S-11-0()10 16161 Short Road Dear Honorable Chairperson and Planning Commissioners: This office represents Bob and Lois Mattison (collectively referred to as the "Mallisons"). The Maltisons reside at 120 Mary Way, the property located to the west of the proposed Project and most impacted by the height, width and mass of this project. The project as proposed is a 3 511 square foot residence with a 781 square foot garage on an unusually narrow flag lot The property is approximately 300 feet long but only 70 feet wide. The property is sandwiched between 3 properties on Short Road and 4 properties on Mary VVay. As designed, the side yards of the lot will abut the backyards of the properties on Short Road and Mary Way. Due to this unusual configuration, the project has significant visual and privacy impacts on the surrounding neighbors that should not be ignored. THIS PROJECT AS DESIGNED IS' CONTRARY TO THE TOWN'S RESIDENTIAL DESIGN GUIDELINES ("GUIDELINES") AND SHOULD NOT BE APPROVED. The purpose of the Guidelines is to "ensure that development is compatible with its surrounding neighborhood." This project fails to comply with the Guidelines in several ways. One overarching principle of the Guidelines is that 'Homes will be designed with respect for the views, privacy and solar access of the neighbors." Guidelines 1.4. As Is easily seen on the pictures attached hereto as Exhibit A, there was absolutely no respect given to the Mallisons' views of the foothills, privacy or solar access. The Maillsonsi view from their backyard and decks will be dominated by the proposed project. This will significantly Maillson/CorriPC-Itr6.22.11 Honorable Chairperson and Planning Commission RE: S-11-001-16161 Short Road June 22, 2011 . page 2 of 4 reduce their privacy and solar access and it almost completely eliminate their view of the foothills. See Exhibit A. • The view from the Mallisons' upper deck and bedrooms will be dominated by the second story of this structure which will be located only 15 feet from the property line. The two-story portion of the project is not articulated and will appear as a mass of concrete overlooking the Mallisons' backyard and 4 bedrooms. This impact is only exacerbated by the grade differential of the properties (the Mallison property is approximately 4.feet ~lower that the project site). When standing on the Mallisons' deck or in their bedrooms, the imposing structure willbe looming -over the Maliisons and adversely impact their property. Contrary to staffs assertion, the reduction of the structure's height by, only 18 inches and the raising of the sill heights of the windows overlooking the Mallison property to 5 feet will not eliminate the adverse visual impacts. Due to the • orientation of the respective lots, the proposed project's side yard abuts the Mallisons' backyard. The Mallisons are squeezed in by the 3 side yards which surround their property. This orientation creates privacy and intrusion impacts that would not be as extreme with a typical development pattern (Le side yard adjacent to side yard or rear yard abutting rear yard). There have been no attempts to mitigate these adverse visual impacts. Guidelines 2.5.2 specifically requires applicants to design with sensitivity to adjacent neighbors. "Existing views are not protected as a right. Never -the - less, additions to existing homes and new houses should be planned With an awareness of the impacts which they will have on the views, sky exposure, sun access and privacy of neighbors," Guidelines 2.5.2. This project was not planned with an awareness of the impacts it would have on the Mallisons. In fact, the applicant appears to have ignored the impacts on the Mallisons. The Mary Way neighbors were not contacted about the house design until after it had been completed. This project also fails to comply with the Guidelines regarding sun access. Guidelines Section 3.11.1 provides "Locate structures to minimize blocking sun access to living spaces and actively used outdoor areas on adjacent homes." The structure was allegedly located with the highest point adjacent to the Mallison home to comply with the Town's requirements. But in doing so, the applicant failed to address the grade differential between the properties and the impact this project would have on the sun access on the Mallisons' downstairs living area and backyard. Although there are Cypress trees on the Mallison property adjacent to the proposed project, the height of this structure far exceeds the Cypress trees. See Exhibit A. That height will block the sun to the Mallisons' kitchen, family room and dining room for approximately 1.5-2 hours per day. The backyard will be impacted for an even longer period of time each day. The living MaII son/Corr/PC-Itr6.22.11 Honorable Chairperson and Planning Commission RE: S-11-001-16161 Short Road June 22, 2011 Page 3 of 4 areas of the Mallisons' home were designed to incorporate as much light as possible and include approximately 450 feet of windows and glass doors. The Mallisons have lived in this home for 40 years and are intimately familiar with the light patterns. Significant light will belost if this project is constructed as proposed. Residential Design Guidelines 3.11.2 addresses privacy intrusions on adjacent residents. It provides "Windows should be pieces to minimize views into the living spaces and yard spaces near neighboring homes. Where possible, second floor windows that might intrude on ;adjacent property should have sill heights above eye level or have frosted or textured glass to reduce visual impacts." Two windows in the master bedroomface directly into the Mallisons' 4 bedrooms. Because of the orientation of the lot, those windows. are only 15 feet from the property line. The windows have been slightly modified per the request of the consulting architect but that modification does not comply with the Residential Design Guidelines, The windows as currently proposed are located 5 feet from the finished floor and are not frosted or' textured glass. At 5 feet, everyone but small children can look directly into the Mallisons' bedrooms. Contrary to staffs assertion, this will not "remove potential privacy concerns along the walls closest to the neighbors" THE PROJECT SHOULD BE REDESIGNED AS A SINGLE STORY STRUCTURE TO REDUCE THE IMPACTS, ON THE NEIGHBORHOOD AND COMPLY WITH THE GUIDEi:INES. The applicant argues that the home cannot be built as a single story home because of "increased impervious coverage which would eliminate area to be used for a pool and outdoor enjoyment." That loss is only caused by the desire to build "a very large home on a very narrow lot; If the house size was reduced, there would be more outdoor area. This lot is uniquely shaped and uniquely located and therefore, may not be able to accommodate all of the desires of the owners. The project should be designed to fit the lot andi the surrounding neighborhood. The applicant's desire for a pool and outdoor space should not be at the expense of the privacy and well being of the Mallisons. The project site is surrounded by single story homes onShort-Road. Three of the 4 adjacent properties on Mary Way are two-story homes; however, they are much more modest in character and follow a traditional development pattern on much smaller lots. Due to the narrowness of the project site and the proposed orientation of the lot, a two-story structure is inappropriate and, incompatible. The one story design would fall within the standards of the existing neighborhood as several homes surrounding the site are single story as shown on the photographs attached hereto as Exhibit B. A single story design, rather MaIllson/Corr/PC-Itr6.22.11 Honorable Chairperson and Planning Commission RE: S-11-001- 16161 Short Road June 22,2011 Page 4 of 4 than the proposed two-story design, will promote neighborhood values and standards as it will reduce the significant impacts the proposed project will have ,on the neighborhood. CONCLUSION For these reasons, the project as proposed should not be approved. Thank you for your consideration. Very truly yours, Kirsten M. Powell KMP:sq cc: client enclosures Ma(Iieon/Corr/PC-Ih8.22,11 EXHIBIT A i i i EXHIBIT B S �zsr.rT un ?s�'j' • w r 3I .1..,,.s.,..-V:V..,..•..,•(,.'t,,''.;,.-Z,,•.•4'•"i..•;'.',.:.•,;,'•,'.:''-'.•• •.'v,'‘-''4:i`'A''..•...•' %,.,., ''., '''• . . s ‘......' •.•',;‘'. ',•..,e:•,.., .,. Ji Avi-l-, ;`• . .,. ,.,• ••,..t'. • 1.. .:1 ,‘ .; .% ' ' ..... '......‘ ' . '. :•'' ,` i'. I.e. 4'.;,':.:',...... . . '.;i''' ''.'.'3,' • . .„ . ' ' . . ' ••• . ' ' '''..,4 • • ., .• keg • Town of Los Gatos Planning Commission 110 East Main Street Los Gatos, CA 95030 Planning Commission, Marico Sayoc RE: 16161 Short Road Place letter in file Dear Concerned Los Gatos Residents, August 23, 2011 RECEIVED AUG 2 4 2011 TOWN OF LOS BUILDING DIVISION S This concerns Elvie Scott, John Scott, and Benjamin Guilardi who own a landlocked lot at 16161 Short Road behind our family home at 112 Mary Way. The concern of the five Mary Way neighbors, adjoining the lot, are the ScottlGuilardi plans to replace an existing single story house and build a two story home that blocks the view of hills and sky for some of them. I received a copy of the Scotts' counter argument, dated 7-25-2011, that the Mallison's representations are in error. The Scotts said, in paragraph 4, that they "have talked to, or met with every neighbor willing to express concerns and acted to take care of their concerns where possible." This is not entirely true. The Scott's have a dilapidated single story cottage on the other side of my mother's rear fence that could be replaced with a two story structure. Elvie said there are no plans to do this. I told her I wanted that in a legal document, such as a deed restriction. She said she could not do that. Her response leads me to believe that the Scotts/Guilardi would push this through with their same non- negotiable attitude. Her response was that this is a "moot point." It is not a moot point. They now have plans to renovate it as a guest house. The Scotts continue to compare their house and lot size with the neighbors and other homeowners on Mary Way and Short Road as if we are all jealous of what the Scotts have bought and want to build. This is not the case and any decision must not be based on this. They continue to add irrelevant facts to then. case. They continue to say one thing and do another and document misleading facts. My concern is that, if any two story structure is approved, there will be on -going litigation that it does not meet their proposed criteria. Once built, any two story structure will not be abated to meet those criteria. We would appreciate the Town of Los Gatos to assert its ability and to help us maintain our property values and quality of life. Single story structures on the lot are a workable solution. Sincerely, Greg Shean Son & Executor for Olivia Shean 112 Mary Way Los Gatos, CA 95032 EXHIBIT 25 This Page Intentionally Left Blank Matteoni 'Lauglin echtman L A W Y E R S Norman E. vi tteani 'Peggy M. O';_,aughtin 'Bradley- M. Matteoni Barton G: t•li htmau Gerry Plnnl.ihan 848 The Alameda San Jose, CA. 95.126 ph. 408.293.4'300 r/ fax. 408.293.4.004. www.matteoni.com Advance Copy Via Email August 24, 2011. RECEIVED AUG 2 =" 201.1 TOWN OF LC)S GATOS PLANNING DIVISION Chairperson Marico Sayoc and Planning Commission Members Town of Los Gatos Planning Commission 110 East Main Street Los Gatos, CA 95032 • • Re: 16161 Short Road; August24, 2011 Hearing— Item No. 1 Dear Chairperson Sayoc and Members of the Commission° This office represents John and Raquel Voris, the residents of 16171 Short Road. Mr. and Mrs. Scott take access across the Voris's parcel to reach their parcel which is the subject of your hearing. I write today to express concern that the Scott proposal may not be approvable in its present form due to.an access issue. The Scott parcel benefits from a recorded 15-foot wide access utility easement burdening the Voris parcel. However, for a variety of reasons, the Vorises and Scotts have verbally agreed that the easement should be relocated a bit to the north of the existing easement. Both the existing and new easements are shown on pages 9 and' 10 of your plan set (the Grading and Drainage Plan, and Site Logistics Plan, both prepared by TS Civil Engineering). Those plans show the Scotts' 'driveway being constructed within the "new" - easement area. The problem is that the new easement does not yet exist. An agreement -has been negotiated and prepared, but has neither been EXHIBIT 26 Chairperson Marico Sayoc and Planning Commission Members August 24, 2011 Page 2 . signed nor recorded due to a couple of unresolved issues. Consequently, the Planning Commission is being asked to approve a project that includes construction • by the Scotts on land which the Scotts do not presently have any rights to. The Vorises have attempted to bring this issue to' the Town's attention'repeatedly (copies attached). The Vorises expect that they and the Scotts will work out their differences and the easement agreement will be signed and recorded. We -believe that the simple solution 'to the Planning Commission's present problem would be to add a condition of approval to the effect that no building permit for the project can be issued until the new easement agreement is recorded. With that condition,in place, the City would not be authorizing the Scotts to construct improvements on land they don't yet have rights to, and the Vorises would not object to the approval of the project, even though the proposed house will reduce the backyard privacy the Vorises have enjoyed since they bought their home. Very truly yours, f /, Cr �f.•fij,� w t P . BARTON G. HECHTMAN Att. BGH.mr cc;. Mr. and Mrs. Voris . Tom Salciccia (Counsel for the. Scotts) Judith Propp John and Raquel Voris 16171 Short Rd Los Gatos, Ca. 95032 April 4, 2011 Dear Ms. Moseley, We feel it is important for the City to know that the easement on title for the proposed property at 16161 Short Road crosses our property at 16171 Short Road and is encumbered by prescribed rights. Because of the situation we both inherited from the previous owners, the drive way location currently shown on the proposed plans is running on our property (in places) and not on the easement. Although we are in discussions to resolve the issue an agreement is not yet in place. We are still awaiting a response to our inquiry (from March 29, 2011) regarding the existence of landscaping plans. Again, thank you for your time, John and Raquel Voris John and Raquel Voris 16171 Short Rd Los Gatos, Ca. 95032 April 22, 2011 Re: 16161 Short Rd. Dear Ms Moseley, Currently the utilities (water, gas, and electrical) for the property at 16161 Short Rd. are not all located in the easement which crosses our property. We would like assurance from the City that these utilities currently on our property will be relocated underground and within the easement as a condition of their building permit. Please acknowledge receipt of this email. Thank you for your time, John and Raquel Voris Town of Los Gatos Planning Department 110 E,Ivlain Street Los Gatos, CA 95031 Planning Department, Ms. Marni Moseley Planning Commission, Ms. Marcia Jensen Re: 1616] Short Rd To All Concerned Parties, June 21, 2011 In reviewing the online agenda for the public hearing of 16161 Short Rd we noticed that our letters sent via email were omitted. I have attached copies of those correspondences because this project impacts us directly, Easement: Regarding the easement which crosses our property, in our letter on 4/4/2011, we stated that we did not have an agreement yet in place. Since then, the plans have changed showing the driveway going through our fences. Again, the parties are close to signing a new easement agreement that, once recorded, will move the easement slightly to the north of where the driveway currently is located, but moving our fences to allow access, as illustrated on plans received by the City on 1/14/11, is not an acceptable option. Setbacks: In response to email sent 4/4/11 regarding setbacks, Ms.Moseley had stated that the town would not "require them to meet setbacks that are inconsistent with the requirements of Town Code". Our point here is that: • The new setbacks were created when Staff allowed the architect to reorient the "front" door, while the driveway and all surrounding streets remain unchanged. R-1:20 properties on Short Rd have front doors facing East and a minimum frontage width of 100'. With the new reorientation, the proposed property at 16161 Short Rd will have a front door facing North and will not meet the minimum frontage width of 100'. This seems to be inconsistent with the neighborhood as well as Town Code. • Staff should not dismiss our concerns solely because we have a large back yard. Our extended living space at our cabana is only 12'from the shared back fence and the new reduced setback affects our privacy directly. Landscaping: • We have diligently fertilized and cared for our trees on our property to create an illusion of privacy. However with the increased mass of the new two story structure on 16161 Short Rd. that privacy is compromised. We strongly feel this issue can be remedied by simply adding 3-5 mature Camphor trees to screen the new mass of the two story house. • Please do not dismiss our concerns simply because we already have some mature trees on our property. We would like to maintain our privacy in the house, yard and at our cabana located near the back property line. • The attached drawing (exhibit A) basically illustrates how much the mass will increase. • Landscape plans were not available at the Planning Department on 6/21/11, but we eventually viewed a small PDF file on the computer and it appears the builders are not adding any new trees on our side that will act as a privacy screen. • In the letter of justification received by the City on 1/1/11 the applicant wrote, "there could be...the addition of some taller trees for screening for the neighbors". We would love to see it! • Mr. Moseley's email on 6/21/11 commented that shrubs would need to be removed in order to accommodate our request, as long as the scrubs removed are not on our property we do not have an issue with their removal, Thank you for your consideration, John and Raquel Voris 16171 Short Rd, This Page Intentionally Left Blank RECEIVED A REPLY TO Ms.Kirsten Powell ,writing on behalf of the "Mallinsons' August 24,2011 AUG 24 2011 We are in receipt of your communication written to the Los Gatos Planning Commission. TOWN OF LOS GATOS PLANNING DIVISION Your letter is inaccurate in several respects. Your most recent letter would indicate that the house was designed without concern for Mallinsons prior to the meeting of June22.This is simply incorrect .Modifications of height, window sill height, window shape, position were made several times before that date. This correspondence was well documented ,and worked with the Town Planning Department within the Town of Los Gatos before June22 date, starting in fact around early April in 2011. Story poles demonstrating this were altered to reflect such changes, once before June22,and once after that date. Ms .Powell,you should either visit the site with story poles ,or review the plans ,because your information seems very limited. Our architect has been paid much attention to Mallinson's concerns in designing the house, and redesigning the house, not only to make it smaller ,but to attempt reduce wall sizes and locations with respect to Mallinson's house. 1. The revised house is smaller than Mallinson's !!!. 16161 Short Mallinson 2 STORY YES YES 2nd Floor size(sq.ft) 1229 1779( 45% LARGER!!!) TOTAL SIZE (sq.ft) 3328 3395 (1% LARGER ) So Mallinson 2"d floor is 45% larger than ours ,and their house is marginally bigger,on a lot that is 33% of the size of our lot. It is amazing that they would object to a second floor design that is 45% less than their own second floor. 2. Reduction of the Roof heights. This has occurred at two separate times (a)The first roof reduction was 1 foot 6 inches and (b) The second at 8 inches ,forming a combination of 2 foot 2 inches which puts the two story wall at 19 '8" ,which is about the same height of wall of the Mallinson's 3.The sill height of both of the windows facing Mallinson IS 6 feet (IN THE PLANS?) and we would have no issue in glazing these windows to be translucent, if that would help. 4. The second story wall width facing the Mallinson's is 33 feet (this is really a small profile, and is a 30% reduction from the previous design) placed in the following positions (a) One wall is 8 feet long and is 30feet away from the fence and 65 feet away from their house (b) One wall is 6 foot long and is 24 feet away from the fence 60 feet away from their house (c) One wall is 20 foot long and is 20 feet away from the fence, 55 feet away from their house. EXHIBIT 27 Significantly further away than 15 feet setbacks of the single story. As far as privacy, noise,..this is much further away from them than their adjacent neighbors on Mary Way. As far as view corridor the increased distance and reduced height improves the view to the hills. As far as improving lateral view corridor the elimination of15 feet of wall expands the unobstructed view corridor from 20 degrees to 30 degrees. As stated lower this can be expanded more by eliminating some pine trees to the South, which we would be willing to do 5.One can hardly call the reductions in area and. volume on: the second floor de minimus,since there was a reduction of 11% of space in this floor, which seems to be your and Mallinson's concern. The width of the walls facing the Mallinson's were reduced by 33%. While on the subject of size, the Mallinson property, a two story property is roughly the same size house,and'roof height as the one we are proposing. It is however,on 1/3 of the size of our property, which makes it relatively bulky. 6.There is a general slope from Short Road down to MaryRoad. In fact our property is about 9 feet below the level of adjacent properties on Short. This is a fact of topography, and is not peculiar to our lot. Our design has increased the depth of the foundation to help mitigate this. You are correct, Mallinson is lower than our lot...they all are in Mary. 7. Sun shadow. The redesigned house casts NO shadow on Mallinson 8. Shrubbery /Trees Mallinsons can obviously choose to eliminate their Cypress wall of 14-18 feet anytime.This would certainly open up their views if that was their inclination, which it seems to be..lf they don't that is their call.lt is interesting that they have maintained the trees this way for fourty years,not only on our mutual propertyline,but also with their neighbor on 124 Mary Way If they would like a further screen of trees on our side we have no problem in providing that. Additionally ,we are willing to, opening up their vista even more than it has been for fourty years by eliminating some of the pine trees, on the southerly part of our property. These trees of some 50 feet in height may well obscure some of their view to the foothills. 9. Your Appended photographs: Series B. It is not clear what these photographs are intended to portray! And there is no legend to indicate that Series A . This shows 4 views from various positions in the Mallinson's backyard(assumption). Many of the shots show story poles of first story roof lines, as you can see from the existing buildings and garage...not sure what the point is on those?? The others do show the presence of two story,but they would also show single story in the same position.The two story show views of the hills. John. Scott neCeiVeci. ci- PL August 24, 2011 RE: 16161 Short Road Good Evening Planning Commission, You have our attorney letter in your packet. A one story house is still best on this lot as stated in her letter. 1.) It is still a two story —too tall —too close. 2.) The 15' side yard setback is just too close to our property line. 3.) The side yard setback behind 120 Mary Way has 4 different setback measurements: 10' 7", 13', 13'9" and the 15'. What is code? 4.) The covered porch setback of 10' 7" is adjacent to our bricked table eating area (S E corner) 5' away. Visualize 2 families outside sitting 15' away. Too close and is the 10' 7" up to code? 5.) I have a comment on the scale 1" = 20' used on some of the 16161 blueprints. This scale when used shows the buildings to be 20 % smaller and conversion tofeet tougher than a scale 1" = 16'. It makes buildings appear smaller. The story poles should show the actual height. 6.) It has been said we were given a 30% tunnel view with the new plan (facing NE). Before the design we had a 90% full view. We are a negative 60% of a view coe c,a 95t Lois Mallison ATTACHMENT 5 This Page Intentionally Left Blank j ELL TG x'EES $272.00 Residential $1089.00 per Commercial, Multi- family or Tentative Map Appeal own Of LOS tJ atos Office of the Town Clerk 110 E. Main St., Los Gatos CA (� _._-_ ___-• APPEAL OF PLANNING CO. lei . SION DECISION I. the undersigned, do hereby appeal a decision of the Planning Commission as follows L E _R PRIISRE DATE OF PLANNING CONLI/fISSION DECISION: i ' (.56" . _ (i Ja ' -,hewf / � PROJECT / APPLICATION NO: 1. S — — " . ► TOWN OF LOS dATOS i r a n. DEPARTMENT ADDRESS LOCATION: /'1:;-1 I ; u' S ej (d)-1 12 ID iss A Pursuant to the Town Code, the Town Council may only giant an appeal of a Planning Commission decision in most matters if the Council finds that one of three (3) reasons exist for granting the appea b 'a,v ' [ Planning, three'(3) Councilznernbers_ Therefore, please specify how one of those reasons exist in the appeal, r sn 1. The Planning Commission eyed or abused its discretion because SEE A-17Arc. I -I z— Ckick. ;OR 2_ There is new information that was not reasonably available at .the time of the Planning Commission decision, which is (please attach the new information if possible): OR 3. The Planning Commission did not have discretion to modify or address the following policy or issue that is vested in the Town Council: IF MORE SPACE IS NEEDED, PLEASE ATTACH ADDITIONAL Sii LETS. IMPORTANT: \ 1. Appellant is responsible for fees for transcription of minutes_ (1h Ck) act 5 3 500, o O 2. ' Appeal must be filed within ten (10) calendar days of Planningommission Decision accompaniedby the required filing fee. Deadline is 5:00 p.m. on the 10th day following the decision. If the 10th day is a Saturday, Sunday, or Town holiday, then it may be filed on the workday immediately following the 104' day, usually a Monday. 3. The Town Clerk will set the hearing withing 56 days of the date of the Planning Commission Decision (Town Ordinance No. 1967) 4. An appeal regarding a Change of Zone application or a subdivision map only must be filed within the time limit specif ed in the Zoning or Subdivision Code, as applicable, which is different from other appeals. 5. Once filed, the appeal wti. lbe heard by the Town Council_ 6_ If the reason for granting an appeal is e receipt of new information, the application will usually be returned to the Planning Co gm ion for reconsideration L_b(S Q,, PRINT NAME.. g619% . M,h,i,� i M A L L! S b K1 SIGNATURE =`3 R' L (/L( DATE: - - 0 1 f ADDRESS: f c .O M A-ie 1/ PHONE: 5-6 0594 P, rY t 0 C.L I - R K` E 1; *** O141tICIAL USE ONLY *** DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: CONFIRMATION LETTER SENT: Date: Pending Planning Department Confirmation. TO APPLICANT & APP1T LANT BY: DATE TO SEND PUBLICATION: DATE OF PUBLICATION: N:IDEVIFORMS\Planning\Planning Commission AppeaLwpd -July 42005 ATTACHMENT 6 August 24, 2011 RE: 16161 Short Road Good Evening Planning Commission, IECEDWg Jl1 S P m2 ZOi1 TOWN OF LOS GATOS CLERK DEPARTMENT You have our attorney letter in your packet. A one story house is still best on this lot as stated in her letter. 1.) It is still a two story — too tall— too close. 2.) The 15' side yard setback is just too close to our property line. 3.) The side yard setback behind 120 Mary Way has 4 different setback measurements: 10' 7", 13', 13'9" and the 15'. What is code? 4.) The covered porch setback of 10' 7" is adjacent to our bricked table eating area (S E corner) 5' away. Visualize 2 families outside sitting 15' away. Too close and is the 10' 7" up to code? 5.) I have a comment on the scale 1" = 20' used on some of the 16161 blueprints. This scale when used shows the buildings to be 20% smaller and conversion to feet tougher than a scale 1" = 16'. It makes buildings appear smaller. The story poles should show the actual height. 6.) It has been said we were given a 30% tunnel view with the new plan (facing NE). Before the design we had a 90% full view. We are a negative 60% of a view cfp-4-0 Lois Mallison Town of Los Gatos Office of the Town Clerk Application #S-11-001 September 2, 2011 RE: Appeal of Planning Commission Decision. 16161 Short Road Plans as they exist should not have been approved by the Planning Department and the Planning Commission. CEO WEE SEP ' 2 2Of i L! l - %tGt%rtr 4/1C/ 4 TOWN OF LOS GATOS' CLERK DEPARTMENT 1.) They did not follow the Town Guidelines regarding Town's Residential Guidelines (1.4) which includes the following statement: "Homes will be designed with respect for the views, privacy and solar access of their neighbors ," This corridor lot impacts 9 adjoining properties. 2.) The Planning Department should not have allowed the proposed house to be rotated 90% on the lot. This created 2 side yard setbacks of 15' for 2 adjoining properties. Because the corridor lot is a nonconforming lot owners should adjust the design to conform to the land not usurp the neighbor's space. 3.) Our Eastern facing land has 45-50 year old Cypress trees. These 14' trees are included in their landscape plan for privacy. The trees are failing due to beetle bores. Heavy construction machines and foundation digging will likely have another negative impact on these trees 4.) The western facing 16161 house has setbacks of 15' (code), 10'7", 13' and 13'9". This and several other issues were questioned at the Planning Commission Continuance meeting of Aug. 24, 2011 but not answered. See attached. 5.) We know of at least 5 adjoining property owners wanting a one story home on this lot. Their letters are in the Planning Department's files. Sincerel , Lois Mallison Q (' Bob Niailison Town of Los Gatos Office of the Town Clerk 1.3E©G• U SEP - 2 2011 B Vfi/ U --AetAta 066(4,4( TOWN OF Los VATOS CLERK DEPARTMENT September 2, 2011, Regarding: Appeal of Planning Commission Decision for 16161 Short Road We have 2 main concerns that we would like addressed by the town council. We feel the council did not follow the specific guidelines regarding the building of new residences, in that new residences 'be designed with respect for the views, privacy and solar access of their neighbors' (planning commission guidelines.) Specifically, the proposed house is very large, and blocks the view from two thirds of our backyard. Given the existing redwood trees to our Northeast, should the proposed residence on Short Road be built we would then have virtually no view from our back yard. We had previously submitted letters and photos about this, but these specific issues were not addressed during the August 24, 2011 council meeting. It has also come to our attention the set back of the proposed residence may not be compliant with the town guidelines of a 15 foot set back. It appears on the plans that there is a small bump out in the back of their house which would appear to be 13 from our back fence. We would appreciate this issue be addressed in detail, since the proposed residence is already planning to build right up the 15 foot set back guideline, and any further encroachment would further deteriorate our views. Thank you for your time and consideration into these matters. Debra Fetters, MD David Clarke, MD, FCCP 116 Mary Way Los Gatos, CA A PROPOSED NEW RESIDENCE 16161 SHORT ROAD LOS GATOS c CALIFORNIA e g 9 rr. A 5 _z_ 1 • RECEIVED 2011 To Los Gatos Town Council TOWN OF LOS GATO§eptember 30,2011 PLANNING DIVISION APPEAL AGAINST PLANNING COMMISSION DECISION ON 16161 SHORT ROAD on AUG24, 2011 Dear Councilmembers, Part of the guidelines of working with the Planning Commission is to not repeat information which has been laid before them previously, and acted upon. In the case of this appeal all of the items brought up by Mallinsons have been discussed openly by the Planning Commission(more than once in some cases).The evidence of this can be seen most noticeably in the video recording of the Planning Commission meetings of July and August 24 and to a lesser extent in the recorded minutes. In those videos, our speakers (architect) Chris Spaulding, Ms. Patty Anderson and Mr. Benjamin Guilardi addressed in detail these points. In fact, Mrs. Mallinson's submission for appeal bears an uncanny resemblance to the sheet she used in her Planning Commission discussion. THESE MATTERS WERE OPENLY DISCUSSED, by the Planning Commission and ruled on by them. These questions were asked and answered, as were the questions on the legitimacy of the setbacks, and care by the subject property owners to attempt to accommodate neighboring views. The Planning Committee addressed all of these issues in two different sessions. Detailed comments on L. Mallinson 's,August 24 letter. (a)Items 1 &5 are purely matters of opinion and not fact. Very skilled architects and 30 or so other people have absolutely no problem with scales of 1'=20' (b) Item2. The Town guidelines are 15 feet and the project drawings reflect this. (c) The sideyard setback is 15 feet for the first story, and setbacks of 20 feet, 22'6", 25' and 30 feet for the second story. Her numbers are plainly incorrect. All of these setbacks are within Town Guidelines. The numbers she quotes are the setbacks for the existing buildings , which are to be removed. (d) Again, her numbers are incorrect. The porch setback is 15 feet within the Town Guidelines. All of these setbacks can be taken from our site and architectural drawings, which have also been reviewed by the City's peer architect.The setbacks are clearly marked on our site,along with the storey poles. (e)Her view is greater than 90% except for trees, most noticeably hers. The architect has shown that 30% of her view has been curtailed, not eliminated. From their balcony they can see any of the view above 15degrees (see drawing A-1.2) .From their ground floor their view is obscured firstly by their own trees to an angle of27 degrees. These comments were raised, answered and reviewed at the Planning meeting of August 24 ,the date on her letter. 1. Detailed comments on Mallinson's September 2, 2011 letter. (a) Item4 ....same point as item (c) above, their numbers are incorrect and her numbers refer to the existing buildings. Review the drawings properly. Our architect is willing to help them do this. ATTACHMENT 7 (b) Their cypress trees are not included in our landscape plans for privacy. They are included as detail on their side of the boundary fence, as are all other trees and shrubs, bordering our property. These trees, however, bound not only our property but their neighbor's property at 124 Mary Way. Mallinson's claim they have been there for 40 years so they obviously like them ,and presumably have watered and maintained them. They are however on our side 14 feet high from ground level, which means the sight line they obscure from their side is 19 feet (they claim they are 5 feet lower than us).These trees do offer an effective screen ,which they seem to have liked and maintained for forty years. (c) Items 1 and 2 have been addressed by the Planning Review Department and the Commission several times (d) Neighboring owners have had their letters addressed by visits, letters, and discussions by two meetings of the Planning Commission, and several of them no longer raise issues, or object to the plans. 2. Letter of Fetters and Clarke,September2,2011 As far as their second paragraph, the detail they need to review is already on the drawings, there are no walls of the house which are within the 15 feet setback to the property line. Our architect will be glad to point this out to them, at any time. In addition both 116 and 120 Mary Way fences are encroaching on our property by two feet, and so this discussion needs to revolve around property lines. As far as their discussion is concerned the main building in their view is a single story! In addition we accommodated them by severely cutting back trees which was (at that time) the only view that they said bothered them. The Solar access was totally and adequately explained to them at the Planning Commission meeting, questioned and reviewed by the Planning Council. The house is not as big as 120 Mary Way, their neighbor, and has been discussed , is within City guidelines, and the owners have modified positions ,and reduced height, three times to attempt to accommodate neighbors. Mallinson's have a larger 2 story home on 1/3 size of the lot . The facts are that their home is 3395 sf and larger than our revised plan of 3328.9. Their 2nd floor 1779 sf versus our plan of 1222.99 = 45% larger than our home but all on a lot of less 8000 sf versus our approx. 24000 sf= 1/3 size of our site.ln addition 53% of the homes in the neighborhood are two stories. We purchased our property in August 2009 with our hopes and dreams for building our new home. To date beside the process of Town planning we have been forced into two planning commission meeting and numerous changes costs and delays in this economy in order to make certain that all has been done to satisfy the neighborhood concerns. This appeal is a continuation of views that have been repeatedly expressed by the same people .Their issues have been addressed fully and adequately by the Planning Review Committee and the Planning Commission.They have certainly had a fair and extensive hearing of their views Mallinson's have already designed a curtain of privacy by 14 to.17 ft Cypress trees on two sides of their back space and other full size trees on the other wall. to the point that they are isolated in their own private haven with limited views of anything. This is by their own choice for forty plus years. Mallison's however have also enjoyed psychological freedom of knowing that there is a 1/2 acre site of open space- a park that they do not have to pay for next door . The matter has been fully and extensively explored, it is time to move on. John and Elvie Scott This Page Intentionally Left Blank CO :dg pagTaosuEas ut1 °' < m [, waw /M 0 Br1G 4 « , mm0M0 00 ~ 0 br&!2 co 0. ; ,,, 0 ® 0 2/ ;% / 1-- 11 1-3 (\ ?/ 0 (! (0 0 I� \ } } \ §\ 5 0 ,\ 0Lw w 0 ® p2p§/7 (} f / §®%/§$ # a 0 CO0 mono NJ H CO H ID u au4 oq enp 'uo-peoTTdd2 easement over 16171 Short Road. 16171, and 1620 Short Road. It is accessed by a driveway south of Old Blossom Hill Road situated behind 16141, The property at 16161 Short Road is located 350' \ a cough drop that I will be using most of the night have a tickle that won't seem to go away tonight, so I have free we welcome your Staff Report. uoTTaoTTddy S-11-001. Welcome, Ms. Moseley, and when you're 42 pa;soot NIQN W l0 N O co J m o N N .c W O l0 J 01 In W N H. (Hi w rt ro a n x p' 0 0 H (D P. N P. P. 0 w x rt 0 0 0 a 0 rH' 0 rt 0r ro P.cl. rt O w H 3 ((DD °a 0' rt N o0. m 0 0 ro H H H (D N 0 ro O cn N N 00 Y ZG H (0 `J 0 (D Frt'• F0Fjj a a rT c°n F'• a U1 rt W (0 0 0 ro ri- N 0 N a to 0 rt (D 0 a rt' iY 00 H rt k iP H. (D H N H 0 E Hz H m a 0 0' H0 a a) O o H r• 0 0 a a Pi hi 0 EN �,a u tit N puP) 0(n r. tg k)H boG o z (D(DP. N O (OD '0 P. N P. 0 '-3 '0 N 0 (D 0 0 N U1 a ` 00 rt 0 V N 0 rt 0' H rt 0 H r' 0 00 H) , 0 N o P' 0 m ID 0 o rt i. to ID 0 a rt W the sill height to more than 5' above the finished floor 18". In addition, the Applicant reduced the size and raised and reduced the overall height of the proposed residence by Applicant reduced interior ceiling heights on both floors 0 E (n w P. 1.1. trt 0 • 0 rn 0rt, H 0 KS m 0 P. 2 0 0 0rt H: N N 00 m (D P. 0 0 r°1 (D m w H °0 a 0 '0 ti w 0 S 0, o 0 r0r 0 H k Throughout the process the Applicant w 0 N p co ro rt H 0 'U P. 0 w rt w (D 0. 0 0 HI (HD 0 0 H. rt H H 0 N P. P. rt G 0 0 0 at0" (D 0 0 ro rt 0 (D N N ti 0.H. VO' N H. 0 a n 0 (D homes on both Mary Way and Short Road, and of the ten o 4 0 0 a (0 ro a rtw rat 0 It 0 w m a a7 0 0 Fi 00ta a 0 X P. rt0 0 r• p 0 to rt w E (v 0 -1 G 0 w N a (D rt .0 P. a G 0 H (It m a M • rr rr 0 °+ to P. 0 0. x H H N D rt 0 rtH P. 0 a s H • w 0 0 H H Hh (D (D a IDD ct 0 '0 0 (D M but will extend closer to the property at 16171 Short Road. a slightly larger setback to the properties on Mary Way, NNNN N N F• �"' 1� '"• F' �' (n W N F' O l0 CO J 01 !r Ja W N F+ O l0 CO J 01 N W N 0 rt H 31 w 0 l4 rt a 6 rt 0 0 H. option in the future for that lot to be subdivided, and if this is one legal lot. With this development is there an 0 0 N rta5 Hhi rt 't r• 0. R. w m w 0 ro r°t ro (0i w 0 (D H ° v' 0 '4 P. G 0 0 n 0 r H H 0 0 0 ID rt (n 0 Hi 0 n rt H P. 0 p 0 0 0' P. a o' '4 co rt a rt p a rt 0 0 o 0 0 (D (n a E E ro, a '4 0 50 a °r w 0 N ct r• '0 N rt o • H w r• 0 H 0 H 0 0 0' Si, H 10 4 rt H HI (D P. ti 0 (D P.a (Nn 0 (n (D P. 0 (DH E roH H.H 1 H '4 'Ji w 0 0, (D w 0 rt (D P. (D rt O '< 0 0 U" (] 0 4 0' 0 0 0 m 0 Q< n 0 0 a 0 E H a 0 UOi G H P. a, 0 O (Ditct 0 ti 0 W rt 0 rt p Hn 0 50 w rt o 01 0 50 rt 0 0 (a� w (Gt a rt rt w 0 (4 0 w H. 0 5o 4 rt 0 E a H p, c� 0 p 0 0 "CI rt Q{wv1 051 O hai o �J x 0'd ' - (ID tT y P. (n rt 0• ((DD '4 H 0 'C • H H. H w it (0 (n 0 0 ID 0 ro 0 0. H 0 0 r 0 a a, N• pap 0 Fn (0 4ti n c+ H (0 (4 0 0 rt 0 0 H 0 10 0 N (n 0 P. r• 0 P. (D H 0 .7 r• rt 0 0 (0 0 w P. (4 w 0 0 00C lQ 0 o• a r• m ID (D O Ha b o hi, 0 G (D 0 H H to ID N 00 P. H 0 a N rt N (D ,q 0 0 H rt 0 x E N 0 0 0 G 0 'C (D rrrr w rt m 0 0 0 K (D H. N 0 0 0 P. 0 rt rt 0 0 w 0 o r PIP' N a,'a° rt h0'• HP H a l0 (v N hi H 0' 51 "0' 0 (D r. b• P. ,O 0 11 rt P. 0. H 0 0 H' R. P. 0 rrr a)a,(Drt 0 0 :S footage and provides setbacks from the first floor as '0 w 0 0 H a 0 0 0 o 3) a r 0 r- 0 a 0 0 o a rt 0 a 0 x a H. co x P. (D 0rt hrt N 0 i (0 hi '4 000 '°0 . 0 H 0 H '0 a 0'G fD 0 rat (D 0 '4 Fr 0 0 0 a a cob Oht u0, N H 0 (D 0P. H (OD (0 5 hh rt 0 0 0 '4 D 00 a N o ro a (D H) w 0 w c w it G 0• 0 0 H H (D (D 0 0 N N N N N N F' N F' F' 1. I. F. H N 01 is 13 N F' 0 l0 Co J 03 U1 33 L. N F. 0 l0 CO J Ql 10 01 W N N 0 0 0 H H O rtCia (D • H H a) 4) H Enm ros ton rt H 0 a rn N N N N rr •asnou aqa. go azts % 0 0 ct '1 0 m a • m 0 • rs x H w rt 1-1�0 (s 0 0 N .rt •0 0 0 a 0 rh N 0 i- ro K rt 0 n a w rD H rD H 0 0 P. rt ras w a 0 0 w 0 (D m O o p rt 0 N. p m w a rt rt rs a 0 rt 4 m 0 G rD a 0 a 0 a m rD 1 0 P1 H ri m rt 5 co rt 0a 0 FS 0 0 'CI 0' 0 Ca 0 0 0 F. m m 0 00 10 a ( ,-r 0 rt rt a a rt 0 rt 0 rt k a' 00 LC a rt F• 0 N E m a a rt a CD 31 a w P1 0, Co a rat 0 P. rt 0 0 0rt Pa 1-1)y C m a 0 0 p 0 m. 0 co E ro a a P. m 0 a. ! rt • 0 N CA 0 rt 0 0 N 0 w a ,� H.rt 'CI 0< rt 0 0 0 S o- aa a °E a ( 0 H. G 0 CD a 0 rt w O' G 0 o1-,a rt 0 it `i. :f fflBdS SIBHO (Beginning of Applicant's call the Applicant. Mr. Spaulding, will you be the speaker H x 30 0 n 0 x m n 3D D1 rt 0 N 0 0 a k r rD rt u - oas.iop :xylasoTI I 0 0 m E 0 0 a 0 rt a H H 0 0 rt 0 a rt rt 0 0 0 0 0 m a rt 0 r a 0 O rt P. rt .o Ch rt m 0 00 0 0 w M '0 a '0 0 k k 'o° •,.) N• 0 at 0 rt 1- Z G CD 0 H ri HN (On hi 0 N 0 1< a E 0 a •• 0 0' 4 ro 3 N. C) 0 a n hi 0 0 0 a Co rt • 0 o 0 o 0 0 '0 a)w 1-1 a o N. LC 0. '0 G rt o rt 0 rt rt (3D 0' rD to H co 0 0" K rt o a • 0 rt n N N N N N N F+ N F' F' F• 1-, F. N N y.a In 33 CO N C. 0 10 03 -3 at In to. Co N C. 0 t0 CO J m Co Ja CO N N 131.6 degrees east of north. So this is north. The sun is rn rt r3D N rt a H N 0. m m rD a H rt rt O. am 0 Q rD rt N 0 N. 0 p shadow of the winter solstice is this one here, and that's Observatory for this exact latitude and as pus apndzbuoT derived that. The data comes Zpn5N •S•n au4 mos; H m rt rt m rt N O a m 0 ro P. 0 P. tY 0 G rt 0 rD x CD a 0 1Nr a 3< 0 a 0 E E m Let's go to the shadow study. We've had lots of tr' rar G' 0 0 N a P1 a H a 3< rs 0 • high. And again, they're also just secondary windows in the they're above eye level and the windows sills are this sides the windows are very high, 5.5', off the floor so a rr 0 m a 0 E 0'ilzt m r0t a • rt 0 • (1 m rt 0 a a 0 rt H 0 k 4C a o hi 0 30 0 r'• rD G a rD rt 0 0 G a m 0 N rt p 0 rt m and only have little, secondary windows that look out over 0 '0 rt ort pa w rn N. 0' 0 0 a m rr, N N w 0 0 5 a H H 0 CCD 3D rt P. ri- o 0' 0 rt m k xopq am. pup quoag smoo.zpaq aazgg bedrooms, including the master, so the bulk of the square rt E 0 0 n CD miCt ro 0 a o N• rt 0' o m h N a '0 X' 4 ras K a P. H 0 0 0 £ Ki P1 N 0 rt x 0 N N a 1• H 0 E m m rt hi 0' a rta rD E m m a like a flag lot and that all the neighboring parcels will When I first saw this site, realizing that it's N N N N N N N F+ 1-' N 1' O 10 coJ to, in 33, toN N 10 coJ m Co ,o• W N 0 y H O rt H Cs) 0 CHn rt zz ) H H H rt •V) ra+ n a d Pt' H (D ( W N '( (D rt hi ((DD P. P. w 0 x W N (D a H. H• 0 Co N (0 m w parsdazd am -4sTI gT 'nod xuegI :MAZOM3ZS H m cn N 0 0 N , hh 0. ID E 0 4 H H, E N w 0 (D rt N 0 P °0 u ,c a 0 n P. 0 H P. a H• z (D P. • CD N 0 rt rf rt 0 rt M ID 0 ID to M 0 N u. '( (ND 0 (G» (0 N P. ID A• ID rt O 0 ID rt 0 N rt rt Fi w 0 -' 0 n 0 0 •Z (0 �, 0 ID a 0 I-, H, GI K M. h 0 ID ro 0 N rrl M E 0 10 `c ID 0 ID ID • CO N u E w 0 O rt rt m rt � a w 0. ID rt ° K P. 0' E E .'c 0 x 10 0 a rn R, P. '$ .7 a 0 E (0 H N ID H• 0 rt K ID H a w 11 y a a a N• CD 0 H N N rt 0 rt N N H. ID 0 rn 0 is 0 G AzP 0ZT io; view corridor to this side of our house for 116 ro rat N d '0 rt ID (D 0 N ID ID H ID H E a rt 1-1 P. rt 0 '0 t1 0 P. 0 rt 0 r rf x ID a 0 to w shadows as best as possible, but also for the views. By 10 rn k G 0 a 0 ID • ID H E a rt tf ID• W rt 0 tt 0 rt ID rt a 1fi H 0 rt ID the most affected, which is 116 Mary Way and 120 Mary Way. rt 0 (D ID N Ul N rt (D ID E 0 0 rt w� rt N I-' 0 ID G rt a 0' E 0 0 rt w CO 0 K 0 H x N rt co H ID ID 'U ID rt (0 rt 'C o 1 I '0 '0 n H rt CD 0 (D tr H (0 rtCD N E ID rt ID rt ID east, so the shadow is cast to the west, 131.6 degrees N N N N W N 1' F' 1' F' F+ 1' 1' t+ I-,(0 O l0 CO J O1 Co is W N F' O l0 CO J 01 VI W N 1' 0 O H O H 0z 0 w a1 N N w w E a rt a 0. P. rt 10 P. rt m 0 LP rt a 4 ID ID ro ry N 00 in 0 0 ID Ia' 0' H a H rt (0n 0' ry0 H N• 0 Q 0 r CD ID o N a J IDD G w ID rrH. t b 11 0 ' Fs 0 a m a. rt N H ID b H H a 0 H- M CD G R. rt ID 0 HI E 0 rt • ID ID 0 a w 0 Fpi 0 ID CD 0 N a H (A N ti 0 0 rt t1 E tt 0" ID 0- IH-' X rt , ID a DI a w ID w rt rt #' above that the Applicant will build infiltration trenches percolating it through into the grassy swale. But over and rtCO rt fl) CD N1- rl•• -1 rt (0 x rt 0 rw1 ct rt x hi P w 0 "' w rt IDD V x rt " 0 0 0 N IIDM 0 D a t1 a to 0 a 0' .-c w H G o ID • ID H no 0R. � 0" 'Ij Q co w rat n CI n ID N NID0ry n rt1 (D W 0 0 0 (D 0' P. a lA ID H H• H w I w CD ID rt elements to it. One is first of all a grassy swale on =xxZOMaZS aug go axPo IIax5; EasPaTd 'abetTPzp w 0 0 0 0 ID a 0 I-� N I'. • w E iv co 'Po rrt k 0 0ID pryF$ O 0 `tan P G• 0 N r7 N H 0 r ID tfi 0 (0 'C '0 P. trl� 0 N n ID ID H, P. C H. H N rO rrrr a rt z ID H w co 1- w bi ID rt H a rt z H (/J ta1 tat, hi 0 0 rt w a w 0 4 n 0 '0 �rt t4 I� "C G rt ryg 0w Q a w x 0 hi rt a r"1 (Gp 0 rt fi x 00 rat 0 0 fD P. ti- 0 m a H 0' 0 CD ID 0 rt 4 w 1-1 E o 0- N • +I E N E t-1 a w ' a rr x r°n a ti a 0 CO N N N N N - r P- H H N H H F, N In tln W N F' 0 l0 00 J O\ N W N r 0 l0 CO -4 0\ (0 W N F+ o m (D 0 H 0' CD 0 �t• Ra • a P. a m a 11a0 < ID rat i o 0i 00 00 00 ti N a CD 0 a H 0 Q. in y (0 P. D 0 N 0' m 0 0 E a )0 (D rt in w a m a P. rt H r •rr o a m H. ti ID 14 z z H 0 a a 0 'a rr H m 0 0 (D N• m w H CD 0H a rat H rt h o 1-11 N Fi in H ) P. • or• z 0 H to O 4 rt,rt H ry al z a r• P.a l0 w rt F' °• a 01 w 0 rat 'eH a E a N N 0 tr' 8 w E rat tD N P. (D ID a a a R. No t• 0S R. N IAN M a 0 d rt o o rn a m rtrt '< 0 0 N m W a V 6 rt m P. a to house is the best solution for this lot as opposed to going o '0 '0 F m a �a rt CL FS 0 rp 0i 11 o G m 0 lq LCIIj rt 0 0 I "0O 0 0 O m N (D '.Z N P. H m wwNw ID P. 0 N H a 0, 0 N rt 5 °z 0 0 rt H 5 ''9 `0. n rr 0 ID rt CD a E E N• 0 11 y 0 '< 1-' z '2 V 0 a 'C o a � x P. 1-' G H H rt P. 'C 0' m try g o G rot N- a H P. LC O H n a rt 4 G b• o '0 a 0 p rt a O In a a a 'C a r- rt h rt 0 ,qq 0 P. a 1-1 G a of � r 0 In m o r• P. (D 0 E 1 In 0 0 N rt rtr o a 0 0 (n H • rn b' N " rt rt rt • looks like a snake on there, and that will plain and simply around the corner at the far left here, it's the thing that rt 0 rt G' m 1 8 P. a rt P. a 0 a • P. m m H in (D m o 0 o Y 0 • LcI O ID 0 G rt CO a N N • 0 b• absorbed into the trenches, and then it will get conveyed N N N N N N - '-+ r f' H F+ H r N F• 0 l0 0J J 01 UN an W N O N CD J d\ N iA CO CO F' 0 In 0 G rt G N N N a P. rt a p p coO P. O N N P. r P w H N O rt Co 0 H r rt rt e. g a m a H H Ha Al � m H 0 G Ti a (D 0 tom/) rt tt rt HH 0 (D o fD z 0 p. 0 P. )C P. N w art• ro E F'• CD w w Hrt ~ H rt (aD hi CL II H a a 0 G 00 +a-' a 00 o' 0 0 rt ro 0 (D 0 m rt rt a (0 x m R. H o �• incl. m 0. 0 1Gn � a P. P. CD a rt rt 0 rt m o a b' a 9. rt m (D 0 1q. H 'U 4 9 a 0 rt P. (D H 0 P1 , a o 0 E 0 H Q. 0 0 C N M 0 N N IA 0 0 o 0 H a m1-' a a rt r• H 0 N• N rt N ,i� �' H Q(DE a b' In rat N N N N 0 0 0 8 o • hi 5 a a P m rt r°i a v lG hi P. H 4 rt (D a P. a 0 0 CD x 0 w 0 0 0 CD0' 0H r• Ina N N• (D (D LC • (D 0 a a IH H lq H. rt DOXHS UIKH0 secondly it really messes up the back yard as well as We couldn't get a desirable layout first of all, o k o rt G N a P. 0 b' kart Ha m 0 P. oo rwr w P. N o 0 w rt rt m 0 (D a ID w o H-' rt 'C N 0 H ti N G ID a rF a N • o m 0 0 0 in rt m r- (D M rt (D r- 0 19 considerably. That's the square footage that the one-story a little bit, but only 6', and the footprint grows of the house gets a lot larger. It would reduce the height one-story, we looked at doing one-story but the footprint 6 a N P. Icl'IQ 0 0 E0 0 a 0 0 H P. a b P. rt (D P k P oH a rt' 0 HI 0 G 0 E 'C • m N M a 0' a r- o a 0' o 0 I a rt 0 0 '"C a N W N G G a a ID N N N N N f+H H f. H H H H (n ,n W N O 1p m J co In W N H O l0 coJ O, In in W N 0 cn rt0 r01 0 I-, 0 H rt O 0 w am •-• N N H H -asnoq aqi pzarloi do xoeq • 0 51 w a m w go, rt 0 0 m p x g N w H, o rt 0 0 0 0' G tD o m 0 Fh wfro rt n rt rt w 0' rt h 0 a 0 0 H H. m H if you will. But it's failsafe in that there's a bit of rt w 0 rt E 0 0 rt a 0 • 0-'rt m K XH, w - rt H 0 C H (D m 0 0 rt 0 0 N w N rt '< (o O N rt a 0 tr N H x x 0 0 6 TERRY SZEWCSYK: If we looked more precisely at Lob nod op riot O O x P. rt ''0 O P' U' 0 ,0 rrf >t H a rt w o y H a)0 H, I-, rt 01 0 £ w rt m '< E 0 0 O o o CD N w o cEo 0 a 0. HN a H, rt m H 0 11 0 H. cn a 0 'c CO w 0 0) a 0 H 01 H 0 rt N DO H rt 'C H 0 0 CD p O O t9 H .J 4C fD O 0 rt to M z rt (1 '0 0 w z 0 0' m 0 M (o 0 m '0 G H hi E fD Q H o CD 7,,° 0 rt 0 rt o hib w p •• rt rt 0 zz- H 0 H H. r a 5Hs oo 0 CD G N 0 0 m r tY n G 0 a r 1.0 G 0 (0 rt G cn rt fro rt N 0 H 00 a D N m r°r m rtm a n m C 4£ m HCC.-mH. P. F., rt 0 p N (1 4 CA 0. m rt m O o P. J 01 0 -� H• tS 0 0 rt £ 0' m H, x Ft: La 0 0 N 0 1 • J rt 51 G a co0, N x a m 1°i 0 0 m m 0- E H rt m • :xxsomazs �iRi3S N N N N N N H H H H H H H H H (n W N O l0 m J O, U. W N H O M m J at N yW N H 0 0 H O H °z 0 Do co N N N H x rt ft 0 0 p 0 CD m H r° prt, m o 0 0 0 a a • 4 r1 m rt CD N C 0 on m G rt rt m prt m :OKIWIECEMS SI2IHD Z44brz 'asnoq kH, rt 0 (D 0 (D G 0 rt 0 pH a qN• R. 4D 0 O E. • N a H 0 0 rt N N rt XI 0. G a 01 w H m rt N p ,C7w H rf H (D H z p. l< o 0, pHp m p,0 a m 0 1-,rt rws h •H 0 w 0' mwa w o a rt 0 rt o (c a v, 0 a rD rt r- o r• o p tm p. 0. G 0 m 0 0 b' m 0 N w H, fro h0 rt w E rt r• £ (-h 0 r• 0 w 0 H H. P. rt 0 k N h: m 0 m H (a G w (CO 0 art '0 p b G rt CDr°n 55 o 0 in w '0 H a 0 £ G m rt H 0 1wi 0 G m 0 G 0 rt 0 H H G to • G 0 p 00 0 a)H M N a 0 rt N m rws. V rt o to o p a 0 rr p 0• 0 rt 0 possible action, and I'm wondering, if there were no H0. g U G 0" H Fr-• 0 0 0 0 p m K. N /� H. l< • Q N 0 n O 0 0 0 55 53 o 0R H rrh 0 CD £ rt 0) �' 0 w '0 cn fro 0 ' �qH H ro G rrf rt w G M to 4 0 w CD CD Di 0 0 rt N 0 0 '0 (0 G ro k H O rt H hi 7, TsCD00P' N' 0 H °tr ,G1. m p• •• x o• 0. H a E 4 0 o G G 0 rt 0 G p w w p• 01 m rt m (1 H p w m H. m 0' Q G rt rt CD wa a (0 m G n O W S W N • N r1 rt ( 0r5r 0 p' 0 (D m 5 m 2 a .0 (D a H N N N N N N N r r r N W N r O (p m J p) r r r r H 4 W N r O lD m 0 N .0 W N H 0 cn )-y H rt°n 0 r z • z rn0 a) o H rt Ft cn o rn aN N N HH hot day down that long corridor, and some of the letters 0 G rt rt tr (D a ID 5 (D rt 13 H ID (D (G+ 0 rt x m (D H a u. FL rt Pi 0 X 4 OP. 0 a ID rt n 0 'G :'IT3NNOQ,0 UZNOISSIDJWOO •TTeuu00,0 tn p rt o (4• o N 0 `D rt co ID r• 0 w a 1-1 0• 0 0 0 0 P. w a ti (D rr rt o .3 p. Px 0 0 H rt HC� rt (� H H (DO O H 0 N H 0 Z CD i H G H 0 En V CD rt 0 0 (D O(D g o t9 �o 0 w t� rt H I• G � 1 H o z rtZ G] (D co(D O G] M a m rt < o n o Ivtr g (1) m w0w (D" a it a '° n ,qn o• o o ,.11 0 (D o 0` N $ Fi rt r F1 m 0 N (D (n ID `t pgn� O rt (GG rt rt GGi O p rt P. o Y• 0 0' N P.a 0, rt ( rl a .J rt rt rt 0 .0 0 rt 2 O 1 1-' 0G 0 rt (D ° G o 0 H 0 m .( rt 0 H m n m b' b' 0 a co P. 0 0 N (D .(D rt H. E G o w 1 0 0 0 H a o co m rt 11 N 0 1-1 `N (ID co (D n rt (D (1 COMMISSIONER O'DONNELL: The fire truck people usually don't like that. headlights would go right into the neighbor's house, and straight this way and back out that way, rt rt m r1, 11 (D 1 w n rt In rt a n 0 Q. E 0 a ID ID rt 0 a (D P. O N N N N N N r r r H r W N H 0 1D m J p) (P .0 W N r 0 (0 m J 01 (n W N H 0 0 0 H H O rt 5 ro+ H H Hz al� H H 0 °t � rt H 00 z w am 0. N N H o 0 (ID o o co N 0 n a o 0 n 0 Iv ro 5 N 0 a p n • 0 m H 4 m (D N 0 p a o co 0 a rt 0 m OZT : s pa -TT I PTTIP r sV and I have been a Los Gatos residence for almost • rt ro rat' z N a H H 0 (D N Z Ca F4• (1* N K N d x N ID n P. N• m En w n (D 0 a a 0 H H H N• (n 0 p • let others speak on this item and then you'll have three 0 O rt m s,;el os 'ii2310 ZsuoT4senb 0 (1 (D a rt m G. :ONICUDVdS SIEHO H 0. 0 a rt 0 0 8 0 E H. E a m the easement? Do they own all that property? 'SOz2E GO'[ go ;zed the person who created that lot granted n 11 (D w rt 0, R. H (aD n N En 0 a rt E w O n (D a 0 (D a rr N 0 O n m rt TY 0 O ID m don't know maybe Mr. Szewczyk knows, when that lot was a 0' N rt 11 0 a P.N 0 Pi (D (0 2. m N 0 m o I,. 1-, 5 rt 0-• " 0 • 0 n 00 un, ,3 (D (n (D Pi O 0 H m rn a m co 0 x 0 a m rt o z N ID 0 a •• 1-rt (D H O H co a H a O (0 b' w J (D k a. 0 rt M N rt m m m 0 I-, H• H m N 10 101 o H 0- 0 0 a rt k H, 7 En N w H goT 0 a frontage; it comes right off Short Road. I have not seen allege that that lot doesn't have a frontage. On the other o to m (di a t' or . W Co O l0 W J at N a.W N " Co -.I W N G Z ,0 •C h £ t7 tr It 0 N x 0 '0 V Co ro a o tr a (3 (D N• N (D CD a D P. 0 N 0 7 orM a H a ID a r w• m a rt rt P.(1 0 r 0 n H r 0 F• r 0 0 0 C a w a CO P. rt N P. W '3 0 ID a a a 0 1-1 0. N 0 P. • (3 Dia r rt a ri n H IG-' rt pP. O0 a (3 0 H LPN W rt h' rr 0• a rt LC1 rt a 0 0' rn 0 rt `J (D a 0 rtw� r £ • 0 J ( 3 0 0 4 7C 0. 0 H r 0. wr W n H 0 (D (D 0 0 Z GG a' 0 y a 0 (� C w' 0 O Ox x k a (wD Q. £ $ ''4 0. (D HI H a a ri a rt P. CD ID H 4 a a '0 N• a 0 a £ a G 0 a V 0' r 0 w r w G w m r �. H P. a a a • G a r p r a H 0.P. P. P. r p G 0 w 0' 0' 0 5 0 x 0 rt r a x H H rt (0 a ct H (D 0 £ 0 0 0 a w m 0 4• rt o 0• k rt r• £ P.'o 0 p to 0 n 0 Hn p rt r 0 4 rt o{p o 0n a a a Rrt rt a ID x m P. Hn n rta rt N ' Lrt a� k 0 ro £ n a a £ 0.) 0 a 0 0' a n a a 0 w N 0 £ o £ 0 0 5n 0 aartp 0' 3 (1-4 rt 0 H a P. Grt 0 n x rp•CD rt rt a 0 m a a a Ft a HRa G'W w H I-, P. Ha rt H(D H G jjo hi a w rt a a a3 P. a rt a 0 a Hn '4 a '4 k £ £ rt a w w • a Ho w w H r rt r m w C 4 a a n p G (n 0 rt rt Hn 0 DoF. (n P. p CD 1 0 H a too a H 0 x w a 0 0 p o 0 0( £ rt P.x p a HI P. P. to n a En a p x 0 rt a w rt (D d a w it FS Co o a w w rt rt w u a u 4 rt HI 0 to B '7 0 0 '.i ro �' ro 'C 0 (�D W a a W a D (i m P. 4 0 0 4 P. a w (D 3 a u tY o w (n a n I r• (a 0 0 C it LI• rt hi a o as N x (3 0rf 0 v, p, r3- CCrt r• CrC I'• f0.' a o a w rat o• o , o rf a a rGi M cai p 0 R R. 0 G rt rt £ N 0 ry rn HS N• rt 0 (D 0 a 0 a N• P. a tv N. a '4 p £ a W a #• £ 0 r k hi, m CD N _ O• a r3)r P. rf prt' h N HG0 (0 1 a - w f r 0 0 u H t o (' 0• m a rt p H 0 0 -3 P. w rt rt ' G' rt w r• H N 0. P. a 0 '0 r r 0 w ram Si C o N p rt N 'C N o t a '(' co 0' P. Hh r a 'P P. I1-' -'• 0 '0 a a 'C rt 0 (0 'n o rt w m 0' a H a m m rt 0 (G( n (DD 0 rt a �C HI H a En N N N N N N N F' '-' fa H N �O (n Ja W N O co. 1p J O1 N W N F' O l0 CO J 0) N W N F' r 0 (n 0 rHr (�] It • H H 1 30 r (0 0 H CD FScn i H rJ0 0 a N N r rn 0 a 0 w " - H 0"rt rt n N 0 0 ro w 1'• r 0 (0 ro far P. 0. 0 II ro at H rt rt to H P. rt 0 go q.ze foothill off of Short Road, and this is the height. These in. This is the first picture that we took and this is the P. ro 0 (D 0 11 (+ ro a 3'' R' rt 0 • a H 0o 0 a 3D rt H 6 £ a K H P. G is rt rt 0 CD K ppa, 0 rt rt w a m m rt rt brought two pictures that I can show you that I've taken. I and this position is not appropriate or realistic. I (3D roN 0rh hi 0 N O 0' 0 'o 0 rr (n G a w rt 0 0 a m a m a Z. a P. 0• 0 H CD0 w rt '-3 HI (3 N `C 0" p w 0 0 x 0 (oo 0' a rt w (D P. ((, E a r' C. 0 0 w him 0, r En a rtID p N. N (3CD P. H P. tOfD 0 rt R '0 a ro e 0 H a 0 H to O '33 to a a N rt rt. rt r� R. r 0 a m rat W N m p $5, rrt 0 No £ P. 00 o 0. H 0,N4 rt G 0' r a rt a rt rt cn H m 1• 4wrt '0 , a 0" o P. Kt ID it o to (D P. 6 to n • rt R (0 0 a a to rt a H1 3 a a 'C rt a r x a a rt 0 x a 0 1 a a 0 3 P. a. P. 0 purchased this corridor lot in 2010, a rt 0 rt 0 k 0 a t) r m• 0 0 0 rt rt a bi a u• O • rt -szaa7 0' rog 9.79114 panTT is Lois Mallison and I do live at 120 Mary Way and I have :NOSITI ra SIO'I N N Na N N N H H H H H H H H H UI .P W N H o ID CO J 01 0 .b W N H 0 (D CO J 0) Ut W N H 0 0 cn J 0d a H 'HH, N O r0cn O to fn1 H 0 0 0 P. N H H H J '4 r• 0 r�F• a to 0 H 8 W P. rt rt 0 W (D r'3' 0 r• CD tD 0 w 0' Pi G Gro ` i 0 to m o 0 m P. r x K. rta • 8 to a n m S w G 0 XI R 0 h to Pi 0 CD w G a a G m rt hi G 0' a E o' P. to a .hrt' r` N rt ID (D O. H w 0 H r H w (D !A H N N CD 0 w N rt N W N t0 lO 070 a 9 m rt rt 0 H G 0' 9 a him r 8 w r o rt 0 n k', H n R. A. 8 0 a CD b' to O 0 w w n 5 w w rt ID • G' 5 H D rt k co to 5 tnr P. 4 rh a 9. 9 0 0 tft rt ¢ 0 w rs It hi ti 0 0 rt (Dr a• . 0 0 5 m rt a. o0 cn P. ro °g P. CD co H '37 O 4 G t4 o H. co to 3 rt 9 '0 '9 0 '4 H. H P. rt x rt 0 N n 0 0 0 G 0 0 "0' a N co a fD �0 o th CD K 0' V+• 0 0 0 '0 P. 0 0 0 m rt 0 rt 0 0 0 ID 0 It • n ID3' CY G H. nEn 0 G a x 1-10' N N a 0 tr o rt 0 tn • (D0rt 1,3 h .0 N tr a)w 0 w 3 w `Q to tD 0 G co 0 o a 0 rt a 0 m rrt m m H. •8 H 9 n ° 0 n m 0 m 0 '4 0 0 � CD CD ID \rt N H G hi 9' r 3 rt 0 rt a :° pQ, H hi •�C N 0 0 rt 0 H• w w 0 o ° a 0' a 0 0 G 0 0 K. CD 0" discouraged, and I couldn't find any of it, so they had H x (I? 0 '0 rt N ras CD a rt w CDa P. w rt H 0 `D I a rt to R t°s N• N 'C 0. P. 3 rt 00 rat o • m a hi m 0 o a b n m 0 H 0 P. 0 rt rt m w (0 M m a 0 rt 0 00 G 0 n N CD P. a 0 0 0 w 0 0 rt m n tD In my very first letter to the Planning •apTs zeugo the north side of the picture, but there's more on the blocking the foothill from the backside. This is kind of N 0 N N N N H H H H H HHH H H UT W N H 0 (D CO J 0) to 0 W N H 0 tD CO J 0 (n 0 W N H 0 O m H H O ,rtm a N •z H Z N O H 0 H rtH 0 z a N N N H designed obstructs 85-90% of my view of that peaceful at the east foothill. The structure as structure and perhaps 10-15 times a day take a break from O' tD a E 0 P. x w n tD a 8 rt x tD w ID tD n 0' tD a 0 G 0 rat tfi w 0 m co i p tD s enjoyed the view of the foothill to the east. I currently tD m n P. rt 0 0 0 G 0 n P H o H. m 0 0 W to tat H (D w m a H a r• 0 CD hi 41 r• a G 0 0 n x a 0 m tD a a above floor level, that still allows anyone over 5' rt w H H rt 0 rt N m hi 0 0 jn�j'' n rt tD tD H. rt • w 0 0 rt 0 the 0 ID 0. t0s x w tD CD H G' 0 w R o k ti H. • rt o t1] m 0 0 rt °' 0 m G ul that property. The property was dug out to put the asaTg eqg uo esnou floor. Our property already is m 0 E vision into the first floor f ue p pj au; 'moot dT second story in the back of my house. Also it will allow 0' G 0 g0g rt ° 0 g P. P. DI rt rn HH x 0 P. H H tD 'U d 8 N H 5 N K. En 0 En En rt 0C CD hi rt hi 0 h G It 0 N• rt G H. 0 `Q "4 m CD (D 0 H. m .• 53 '4 rt 0. 0 n y co 0 H.0 n 0 Lg H. tD En n G 0' x En n 9 CD p to 0�CD (0 0 rf R. 0 0 0 °U 0 rt 0r. to ii hi hi 0 0 14 w LI. to $ '4 0 tt 0 w rt 0' a 0 tD 0 p. H to Mallison; I live at 120 Mary Way also and I appreciate the O cn z 6] 0 0 a tD tD w H 13 0 tr' tD n rt N N N N t+ IQN t+ t' „ �-' t' F' F' �"• i..� !P go toN O to CO J 01 lP W N F' O lO Co J Co N JoW N FS 0' '0 4 st 0 (q 0 r 0 rt0' a P. '0 u. 4 a NO G N m o rt H 0 N w Hu. rt N Y. a ID rt r far w ¢. ro P• G 4 o P• • a m H KS a 0 ID 0 H rt a a a rn 0 (D '0' 0 0 H 0 rt 0 0 a. m.. Er) (D 0 t4 N a H. z°z rr a 0 H H. rt)p. P. N� H• 0 rt 13 N ch rf a LP ch 0' 54 51 a N N N o w 0 H '0 G ~ 0 0it 0 a a rt r( a1 P. a a rn r m ko SEM au 4Euq. puE with Ms. Scott but was told he did not live on the property 160 Mary Way -he is the Executor of their estate, and 0 hi rt (1 00 CD k tr' tY r04 rt o 0 rt N N 0 N N rCD IDat (D N rt rtCA(r fin ot hi w rat rOt rf 4 0 rt H PI In w 0 H rID G at a N 0 3 I(N a 0°rf Nu 0 a 0 rt E a HI rt 0. W £ 0P. G 0 u,P. 0 0 o N m m 0 b' ID rot rot w a ro rar a n 0 rt 0 '0 0 0 a 'd 0 51 a r0 ' at (D icl p a e ua, rt 0 'd N rt ti 'a1 Iw-' frf'• " 0 ,8 rh P. rt 3 R' 51 rt a H a' a (0 0 N• rN N rat rt rat a M H. ~ SP 0± I -II ID 0 o rGr ID o ID a rt 0 0 a 0 O, N• 0 o rt ID z G rt w rt .._4 N w m r"n' N ID U) 0 N P. H a ]" rr o w ID • (D m 0 0 Iri- w rt people that are involved could not be here tonight for 0 O H tt 0 ~ rt a rt P. rt rt ID r (n H 0 ID 0 0 a • H rt 0 H 4 � 0 rt d H a b' H H. (D a rot, N• 0 ro w a ID m H rt p (D Fi " `D P. . 0 ro rt w In a N' 0 0 4 0 N 0 a H N 0. H 0 rC G II g� H. 0 H rt N rt H, H P. 0 0' 0 G a 0 a a Ia-' a 0g rt ta ti 5 p to0' •t rt CD G H, (H0 (D 0 tY H I� 0' m 4 (I) 0. a G H In (D (n in W N I-.O ,D m J Ol In GI10 N F' 0 \U m J O, Co ,n Co N H rn 0 O 0 rt 7X 0 r H, w a a ki P. rr a Y, H V W 'd. 0 x. H 0 r pc' G ID N r 0 0 0 Y• rt I4 H P. In H 0 r a a a o a' a ID 0 a G a w 0 H. 0 0 9 H 2 H 0 N a 'C Ha 'tl rf rt G' H 0 0, o G a rt w 0 rt P. b' m P. ID a m r a a 0 • 0 (n rt 5 p 0 H. 0 p a r d 0 ID () ¢ w 0 H H r 0 rt X' rt w rt w O ID 0 ''3 0 0 0 0 O 0 W a a 'C' H P. a w rt H H 0 ID En O 0 a a a 0 0 a a W P. 0 0 rh £, 0' H W K 0 W rt p rA ti a H• aal P. 0 a w w P. a rt P. u d a d N rt G d E H a 0 r c) 0 P. it rt H N ',3' U) F','. a P• IC it a H N H 0 a 0 P. a P- \ a 0 rt a ro o a r a 0 a d N a H 0 rt g H 'C co 0 a G w O 8 ('' a a a •J 'Z P. P. m H , 0 o a a w P. 0 'C t' a w a (n hi u, 0 r 'a H a in 13 W�• '4 r H w H. a In a • H, pap H E b' t0 o 5 •cn 0. n P. N" 0 rt 8 0 a 0 0 w G co `t7 a 2 a 0 a 0. Fh (rtl d IID 0 N rt H H `4 a N H 'C (� H C. wqG w a 0' C rt a P. p' H• j.-I ', y 9) ran H 'C 4 a H r N (any' a a � to N a uo rt rt a d u m rt 0 E 0 d ,2 0 0 0 rf m 0 m w '0 Fi (D ua tr 0 a �• rot " ID G '4 0 0 ID G a a P. a u, it 0 Y• rt •0 ID ••w H In rt N a V G 0 0 0 H. a rt P. a P. H. a Y. N. a a n 2 H. 0 a 0 t7 w Gn p N ID ID ID 0 p• 'C r m a p a. 3 N P. a P. H r 0 a H, V w (' a G H 0 17 a f) 0 a u) P. O o H �' - •�' H G) w rt P. t J G H 0 G r 0 a w rt N 7., H 0' V rt 0 a 'C. H P. G I--' .H rt ID a H a w H 0 0 N co In ID H a 0 U. CD 0 0 '.b ,o H 0 t) H'0 In rt In 0 G a � rt x tr rt tn H H (D H' r W H 0' rh rt a UI r '0"' • a rh rt ID 4C Y. a .0 '.1 0 'C Ji Y• a '4 rdr Icnn o a) rat a 0 G w rt 0O 0 0 G z 0 0 0 m 0' tas h7 H F'• rt 0 N W tGf 0 G) N "a C. �Z a O J• H G w H H a H rt H• a �' r r rt >T O a a rf H H a 'tl z a a 5' w £. d H 0 'C a .'�' a a '0 91 H P. 0 Y. rt U, a- 0 z a H H H TTTM 4.94 seurTepznb get the project approved but ignores O N W N N O t0 CO J 01 !n a W N t+ 0 t0 CO J 01 in in W N 0 m 0 H O rt m •a H H rn0 � o 0 CHfi Cn rt 0 0 z En N azauy •aTzznd ]' 0 a. tY CD 0 rn In 0 hi rf 0 hh FS ro 0 CA rh force the wrong piece of puzzle into the Di r0n P. k m 4 m rt w ID a a N• 0 m P. 5H• H IDr p H O' 0 P. 5 rt a N rt O. rs 0 rt fl, P 0 m 0 (1' 0 0 0 0 Y. W to G Iq En O. a fn W 5- 5 . ron rt rt Si0 N 0 rt H m LC G 0 h' a 0 0 m 0 m �' ro ri CD £ a p a rt 5 En p q 0 N 0 0 N rt hi P. r• O' p 5" a 0ig H 0 (Da m 0 m P. p a G 01 LQ 1- 0 `.E h a O 0Y.' O ( hi CD rt N N N rf G co ID CD 0 rt (1 • IHD•' rf 0 P• H. rt hi En G H rt r+ 0 N 14 5 0corr 4 I • (D rf 0 rD (D a) N In 1 m a m a 0 m • 0 a 0 0 m a H m 0 H to la-' IH• (D hi H W 11 0 rt N• IC •R 0' 10 10 rt b G G coOP.a o a Cu m 0 £ 0 0+ X rF En rt ID 0 '0G En E rt o G m N• (D '0rt ri rt a+a04w N hi rt N rt r• P. m 0 CDw toc0 hn ro , a) P. h3 (1 a. 0 m tat CD m p m hi 0 annual vegetable garden, practicing baseball, playing hide a 1 . co a IBC-'- H frt- O aa' 0 0 tg £ rtm a. (n F3• N o x m rt G 0 a hai r- 00 0. / T fID rt LC H Cu C] N rf a o 7 hi IQ H N 0 N• 0 rt 15 ft Ghi rl. 0 a Iq a C 0 '��' H a 0" Ft m m w 31 ID G hi m Pc"N rt 5. CD 0 0 0 P. P.P1 R. w rt". 0 a)k 8 w rt 1< o 0 '4 h 5 o ro b £ 1- '5 h' a O H 0 CD rt m m H m £ C co p 15 w 1.4 0 a x C £ H rt H P. 0. N rt 0 pieb pu my parent's house. My parents are the main reason my 3 k 0 H ft ro 0 14 a w 0 p fD w K w m x a rt N N N N a W N H I- 1- N F• F+ O t0 CO J 01 (0 is W N 1-• 0 t0 Ol J 01 In 0 0 cn H rt En H 0z 0 - a N N N shading from our proposal. Let me get back to that shadow Maybe they'll see our eave and maybe the tops of the even see our windows, because these are like 14' tall. behind this wall of Cypress, so I don't know that they'll 0 0 o hirt m wEn H CD rt G Y• CD 4 En rt rt ID £ rt 0G `0' 11 N 11 N rt N ((0 (. N• O x 0 03 m N• N XI m cD (1 0 0 m N. P' m rt 0 a 1 a 0 o o rai rt N hi • G 0" N 5 (D 0 (D hi (D (D G 1q N• m 4 N- 0 4 P. H o hi 5• 0 1a1 En,31 rt W (D G rt rt P. • LC 0 m a CD CD rt 00 W N rt W p, a rn G C rt E 0 w m ID G 0 0 rt m a G tq a £ H ro a (D En P. 0 a• 0. rrtr 00• 0' rt n 0 rt 0 0 0 hi 0 (Do N0 a 0 m 0 0 m . (I)0 ' m y r0F 3'' Cu N a) 0 0' `,i' rO ( m hi N E m w rt rt 0 0 0. � En H P. In am uo suaam geuy 'TTP4 dzaA aq TTTs pausTuTg oq zooTg gubTsaAa aua anoga s,gagy •„9.S actually proposing that these windowsills from finished CHRIS SPAULDING: First of all, privacy. We're the end of the speaker cards. Mr. Spaulding, you'll have H En 0 m rh 0 G J 5. G • O G H 1a. a rt m developer and I appeal to you to do that. Thank you. N N N N N N F+ H H H H N N F. F' FH W N H 0 10 r0 J or) 01 Ja W O lD CO J 0, U+ J% W I. H rt rt x P. 0 0 a a a rt 0 O O FA N 0 rt CD Fr ° P. X o k o H rHt0 G 0 to g ro H r• r x N 0 2 (D w 'A 10 z £ H a Pc '4 P. 01 0 I-,0 n)N rnn m 1< H ° En N N G 'tf 0 �q r• rt H 1-1I-1 CD'C S Cm 0 7 0 N M a CI) N N ro N rt 0 '0 IV IVH ID (D FS H 0 Wrt H 0 RI rt 00+ 0 OH' 0 H ' `Ffi co N W you say what's the house across the street and all that 0 a Fn rt ro m 0 H d m r• rt 0 oo r.to rr++ o G p n o r• G rt ID (D tn CDFa a n a O H • 01 10 (0 -I'�. o Cr,rt O .5' • Grt rt rt m m 0 a o F o H p W that if you reduce it by 6' you're still not going to have understood that when they bought the lot. It doesn't appear very, very difficult lot. It's also obvious that the buyer n O ISSIONER O'DONNELL: It's obvious it's a u H rt Pc In FA d H, x J m G CD ` P. '0 N 0 '0 m G H 'C P. w 0 • P. 00 n ID rt w •J Ul r• o p P. N En • P. ' o N op o• m o H 0 rD N w ID 0 N 0 0 m H H rt N P. H as N P. rt w ar rt 0 CD rt Ft N U1 a cD Ul 0 H rt a rt m portion. It's about 60' at the closest to their residence, b rt H 0 n b' x CD w N w M H I N• 0 a £ 0 rn rn x 0 o 0' 14 G o. x n P. rD ta rn rn CD rt N N co N p' P. to 1-1 rt CD P. m rt O N H 0 ti rt r• P- O U1 m FGs rt P. 0 rt cn m 0 O N �C this corner of their yard is shaded, and it's mostly going 45 minutes it's completely off the house. By March only rt 0 0' Di m rt k m N ,7 • P- CP H rt P- O 0 k 01 0 0' PC P. rt m rt P. a P. G I fD MPc 0 N H0 0 w N 0 FOh N CD0 o rt 0' 0, £ P. M N N N N N N H N '-. 14 F-• H H N W N H O 10 CO J 01 Ut Ja W N IH O l0 co J 01 V, iP W N 0a n G ha P. n rt rt 0 rt a 0 m n Z 0 Co r• O O O H tn. N CD 0' 0 p' rD '0 0 0 0 N rt P. P. t p. n Co P• a, m 0 Q w 0 m ep a rNr rt {v u• r• En 0. 0 (Aw o 0 .-Iw P. 0 00 'O tY .:,rD 0 W rD P. p N rF 0 0 G n N G m Frtt N 0• 0 0 0 G 0 £ n CD n w 0 H ID • r• N 0 gg £ CD n 3 n co 0 0N,' 0 N P N rt N CS 0,CD O h` a W 'C N CD O £ En d w 00 7Hd cn• Y0' m N• rt g N R. '0 w 0 uHi CD "HU rf' 0 F{ UJ N UJ C P. 10 G r/� p 0 Ft, rt o H m CDw 0. H 0. � H H W y I� 0 rn m 'CI R. 0 p P. '0 £ G ° 0 r+ 0 0 °z CD 1-4 rt 0 m a o rt n n 't7 o z H 1-4 H G rt t� 0 0 (D • It (D G H I .0 hi H. 0 V a U, C� P. 0 0' H rD H N r r• u, r 7J x n rt r P. w • m CO rt G R m °o ti rt 0 rt •H C m G N 0 0 to a n 0 N x H. H 0 N L] rt U, 3 '`n z p Q O 0 H �O�tt p H rt rt k H 0 rt x rn czi C n chi WGW G W. w m rt rt w G• z 0 1 'c o F, CD rD r+i 1Y H. a a p w 'C p' a' x P. 0 X 0. ° m H G H p, 10 rt co a m p 0 'CI H n0 r• H CA (D x H IDD 'J' 'C rt N x- a 'C. 0 G '� rt 0 m r• '< a ro G x Ti �' 0 to rt H rt 0 rF 0 H 1C rt n art' £ 0 H CD ID cD w 0 cD ,7 N J • cD rt P. o a m m w w k C 5 G w m G £ p £ H N W r• 0 rn N N m rt rn n n rt 0 r• fD 11 N F'• rn rt H• Z N N 7o z 0 H w N. y r m rt P. P. 0 rt r• 'j w rt N '4 rt b' m rD £ N r, m to N a a a '-4 p 0 G 0 0 5 R, P. m m G v, u, r• N a Ul CD w N a rf ro H r• r• cD N rn rf O w a U 5 N H rt .7 a H 0 0 rn P. CD b' rt. 0 4 • 0 a • H 0 H G 'C 00 to •� 0 N N 'b P. H0 N (D H rt £ a £ rt pH, p, N N FI 1'' Ffi N N N Fi rt (DD a rt Co w rtG n °I H ,r7 Uri 4 0 0' H o 0 c f. a n a art rt a 0 Ur G w a) CD CD F{ N D ra 0 0 0 rt x W 'a' 01 N p O p 0 Ft 0 £ 0 N v, pop Grt, � G 0 m a 4 c x N 0. ,C N m G 0 0' m C 0 a rt w 0 P. rt £ a' G Cn o CCD H rt 0" m rt H N a '7 .A a got. But this is a really difficult lot and it just adds G cD a N n P. 0 rt 0 N rt x m w P. m m N x N a a rt 0 a 0 w rt rt x m K N N N N a W N (n N N N N H O rt I t; V. H. x rt 0' (n m H. ID(D w �O N H. (D ,0 o D H H ( ° rt o O 00 o P. t, ID d H CD 00 a o a H 7H-, �� H N 0 co u, (D H O o w o m V H N to rt hiH rtH 0 ( 0 N o z CI 0 m 0ch p H 0 a \ P 'C W H. 0 tv H w 0. H 0 o H ID h H F• rt H G 0 rt H a G• m -asnou H H H H H H H H l0 OJ J 01 N Ja W N H O tO CO J O1 (n W N H lot right now and I'm really struggling with what's the m w roxo H ly ID r m N U) 0 0 ID rt rt a M ct W x x rt G (D H 0 to (D '0 u+ a G Li. a G h rt rt a)I. 0 ht p rt o m rrt G N En w w H (D w c 0 0 E u. NP. m (D H a rt H • m H 0 H r. rt rt 5. N• m u. h h '.r7 Nrt 0 rt x G o m m m h rt D m N_ w w Grt rt H :a790 3NYf 0 H 0 00 0 0 -aTbo lauorss sggbnoqg aup xxau before, so that's what I'm struggling with and I'd love to H. G M H 0. rt 0 m 0 0 ° 5 ' rt rt m V. alp ct N '< 0 rt rt 0 O H (D rat hi H H r- o m (D o 0 (11 om m m rt rt O 0 En cort 0' a m H g b' H ro O to G G u. rt m rt '0 0 0 TT2 a42aao -smaTgoad er.14o esau; rt h Do rt b (ID m H. (`(DD rt Ca0 m y h N H. 0" a En a) m CD m o w. H w p' 0 h H G rt rt h" w 0' rt o 0 rt rtam m 0 En rt 0• w f. w m w rt 0 m a rt 0 w h 0 (D 0 . '• c H 0. p rt H 0 rt Hr. 0 a 'c rn a� m o u o Pi 0 rt co � rt 0 (D P. H a' 0 m 'c a 0 hi � N 41 0 Y. H. a ct 9 g rt rt 0 hi 0 N• r. p' I n a m 0 En CD rt y 0 a 0 0 0 a H rt m 0 LO N m (D o m r rt site, trying to live next to a site like this. I can see N N W N H N H H H H H H H H H 0 ID O) J 01 N 4, W N H O tO CO J 0 0 H O rt En %• • H H H HO H tn rt H 0 Di0-1 I) N N r H N ID a w (� 0 0 N N a .7 co H thy H w hi h w0 rt h E m rt h• x rr N G H. m 0 m 'C V 0 a !O'. E N .7 R 0 '� (Np rt H a rt IP P. rrt r0r m rt rt m C 0' N• rt �' rr w u rt w ro a H a E n G o" 0rt 0 rt m (D 0. o p (I)u, H m o a,r• CD 0 p h N rt r7 N (a(I) H. H V o /D (D (D ',7' F+ 0 E w G a )0 rt trn 0 tr' o 41 rt N h p P. 0 w H. m r. rt a m h G N 0O (D rt O p a O 0 a '0 H cil E o u E N• o ¢ a G a m w to w H rt ° rrt ° 0 H r• m G rt m co ID x '- ID I o rt0 m w a H w m o 0 H w rt * h rt a 0 m G m o 0 a 0 rt m G 0 u, 0 N u h (D 0 w a n a ti 0 G m • r• �t hi rt l• a 1 w x m N 0 w G 0 ma m m m ° RH m rt 'Pi R w .7 g rt N .`J` h H w a Ili k rt(D ct 0 ft m `G N ro N rt rt m r°t N w '.7' N a ¢ W r H. roh rr 0-. Q. rt rt o rt m E w rt rt N rt p G rt m rt m (D w 0' (D V0 N H. p ro N H rt x h h G H 0 E n m H �' m ° h 0a 0 ti rt LO En r• 0 w cat m o 4 w o w `* 0 * 0 0 h a m w w m 0 m H a 0 r• '°0 x• rt a rt r• o r' C a m u 0 r. 0' H 0' A' N O Oo (D h rt m m a H H H ' a O In m W N H q.o rules we typically apply were not designed for a property rt ID w F0 0 ' m rt rt H. 0 0 h D, rt 0 m x (D h 0 h E m r• o H O h 0 4 (o N m 0 0 in. mm h W NI 0 • G% 0 0 a H. Pic-t_ w Y N I 0 p ia-' R o 0 hi CD G G M o rt- O o H t x N o rt w 0 a. I 0 a N o rt H H IP 0 'a t rt rt r 0 �N E (D u I N N N N N N H H H H H H H N H H lP •n W NJ O W co J T /P A W N O lD CO J O\ lT W is) Pc rt 0 rt 0 G 0 0 N k r0r m P. 0 pG Fr, O a P N V a 0 pi co cia 0 0 0Fs 0 r O HI 0 rt 0' k H N rf 1--,0 ul m V r0 rt w H. • tY a M N 0 1-1 W 0 0 I- 0WI H, N x N rD w G 1' P, rt cD rt CO 0 $ 0 o rt rt rt a rt a m 0 0 rt ° O 0 1 ft p o m p a w 0 rt Pc m 0• 0 a 0 0 N J observation that the architect for the project made about '0 x w 0 4 0 N r rt N P, r H (0 (- 0 0 0 N 0 P. Co H 1 p. 11 o (o W 0 F'• CO 0 H N 0 rt 0 0 d• 0 H 0 W x FFtt m x °• z a (D to .. 0 13 H w rt co V rt PI Co 0 (-1. N H k r d H rt 0 N a0 0 to 0 hi N. ° r+ w 0 H co m issue; I just think perhaps it could be a little. bit 0 0' m p 01 0 x WI rt 13 0' to m ° 0 N• to p m 0 0• o 0 0 n H0 ray � H 0 N a rtirt Fi rt (D D. (ID rt 1'• 0 Fr-' Co4 to 0 k (D house, whether it's shrinking the second story or just ti to 0 1- 0 w a. P. y rt rt 0 (1 rt • a 0 m p F • (D wa 0 m 0rt NG CD rt m OH. 0 13 x N ° co 0 rt o m $ fA 0' 0 0 0 w Co 00 m So if that means decreasing the footprint or decreasing the P. 0 0' 0" HI 0I P. 0 m rt k O m H-1 H G is:1 CD Pc m a 0P. x m 0 H W 13 co H r 0 0 x oo F°n 0 G w• 0 rt '0 0 a 13 0 13 0 0 w m rr (D 0 rt 01 r a 13 0 t'• a N• I E 0 m 0 N0 Pc to rt • 0 N rt V h r 5 x r• rt wm(I) co a x 0 0 N• 0 p 8 co 0 N m 0 rt r• to m 0 O rt 0rt rt 1-1, H 00 H C1 (D 0 ID rt 0 0 0 0' 0 0 to 0 0 0(D 0 0 u. £ m m rt 0 0 tr a rt n rt N N N N N N. H H H �"' �'' H �' �'• H H rP Ja W N H O W N H O lD 00 J 01 N W N' H 14 m w w 0' k 0 o CO 0 rat rar 0 m Po 0 .rt rt a P. 0 0 0 L0 o. a N w W 0 0 0 N 0 H O 0Pc H 0 O O rt 0 nm 0. Ha t 1 a rn 0 ai a cn (n rn rt 0 (D 0 F-4 rt o 0 K oz xi N 00 ',yy a 0 t 1. O M 0 o G z 0 • 0)' , Ho 0' 0 0o m z N o ° 0 1-, o m ' 0 0' coro ° :* n d rt m P. a k H rt 0 O IJ 13 G a m Pi G m ID H 0 N 1 0' co a o H a H ka m 00 H ,qH W 0 0 N G' 0 -1 rat a a ro a (G(1)w 0 G 0 0 rr 0 rH• 0 N• G • 0 O O W m rt w• O 0 a m 0 0 a co e.i o p w 0 G o a m 0 co N a (D co n to do it, but I think there does need to be a little bit 0 m a 0 0. m w r' N ti rt 0 0 0 Ft m M b' r rr Lc, a Htra Iai 0 o rt O 0 0 1 0 0 rt rG a N H m a rt �d o P. 0 W 0 going to leave how that's done up to the Applicant. They've the motion and see if it passes, for a redesign to try and certain, and we'll get that date from staff after I make O 0 o N. 0 rt H rt O H . 0' vi rt W En (1 o °z 0 0 rr o 01 "D o 0 0 4 SOU rt o c0i [7 k 00r rn o• m 1-'- 0 O' 0 H FS la-' rt 0 D 0 FFSS H ID rt W P. 00 CD g rt N' 0 0 rt Al k a 0. a rt (D going below grade rather than up a second story with some Al IQ N N W N Ni NINi I-,I-4 F+ I-, F+ F+ F• 'F+ F+ O 1p CO J 01 CO is CO N ( 0 l0 CO J 0) N Ja W N 1- 0 0 m H O rt 111 (1,z Hz rn r0 CD I H rot CD rt H 0 0 w rn a•- £ N r• w o O (p P O (0 x 0 oo (b N 0 N O 0 0 0tn m 0 '.7 a t0 N• w N m rt w 0 rt. m W H P. rn 0 0 rt 0 rc 0 0 0 N 0 0 m TiTM uoTgom at;; 0 (D rt Staff and all the departments to review them to get them ID 0 30 0 fD fD h4 0 a 0 n m (D w N• 5 ro P a 0 5 m 0 a 0 x rt 0 rt m it would depend on when the Applicant and the civil Applicant, but of the two dates we have the earliest G 0. a SANDY BAILY: We would need to verify with the a rt N :SI0a91100H UHNOISSIWNO0 This Page Intentionally Left Blank / 0 y f § /0 0 / \( « o m 0. ) §Ft / 5 o § \ a 00 &y Ca 00 j( P. &$ 0 / D/RE/§ § / Q. [ §j 0 P.Fi 0 ° © ° ` D C:7 0 °' in Da Q m /°052> \3 0 0 /k[\)\ cn co \ _ 0 7&°t • °- , a G .( §% (P. , width along the west elevation from 48' to eq; pue 'qoo; axenbs 6bi Applicant has also modified the pesodord egg. ;o ubTsep - •/ } rh Ph 0- \0 § ) } K 0 • \ ( 0 § Fi \ \ \ ( 0 ) / } ( ( [ ( P. 0 25.71'. Additionally the Applicant has further The height of the residence has been reduced from } \ rt 0 [ e hi 2 Q 0 0 / & 0 & 0 § ( 0 H ; ~ § \ 0. ( CD \ ( 0 \ a. 0 / . / ( ( R. 0 \ ( P. \ 0 / ) \ ( \ agq. 0 , project on June 22'd of this year. The application was ssion considered the proposed 0 ` 2 \ P.0 \ \ \ 4 ; § \ CDe H \ 0 P. _ 0 ; 0 \ co t ; p , 0. P. § CD 1 P. H / 0 \ & R & / / \ 7 * r a H / / ) ( .§ 0 0 (rt } [ and Site Application S-11-001, and Ms. Moseley, will you be June 22'd. It is located at 16161 Short Road, Architecture / ( / / H m '0" 0 / • \ \ / / 0 0 P. 0 0 0 / * 0 0 } 0 \0 § \ \ / 0 0 cn ATTACHMENT 9 N N N N N N H H HH H H H 11 ,b 01 N F' o l0 cC J 01 In 01 N H 0 la CO J irk . In 10 N H li 5 P• o. 0 o• 0 0 o R. P. 0 cn ID a N r• ri. EtP. 0 N 0 0 P. o. ° p a. EP o p ID ro 0 ID 0 In t. o m m rt m m 0 HI to ��qpp 'n n 00 0 m 0 y tY t11 0 rt G ai rtE Nrt • o Et 0 m ,Ga t.,b01 m £ 0 H P. F-, •' z 0 Gt. 10 as m G "m H a 0 0 N 0£ 00 W 00 H o a'm1<w In x .. 11 P. x ID o P_ o rt TS 0 °z ro 0 ° ED m 0. a N z 00 0 p0 k r0 p. CoID Et H rt 11 4 P1 rf D 0 N to . rt ID Fh H p' 0 H H 1 gCo p IN) 0w rt w 10 Ft 0 (0 N En rt rt rr P ID'' m 0 ID Additionally, Condition #32 of the Draft m £ H rt H• m 0 ~ H rt 0 P. m rtN• Et 0 G ID H 0 m 0 w In F• 0 rt P. P. 0 ,c 10 rt a ,•< 0 0 ro P. 0 cn 5 rt x rt P. N 0 0 b m P. En Ft • 01-3 ID P. m 0 1-3 o P.LP m o rf F°h O 0' 0 ID ever include a second story as feared by Mr. Shean. A deed rt x ID ID x P. rt 0 10 a m rt a I a m 0 0 a 1 rt rt p 0 rt rr ID ro m m P. rt 0 One, we discussed this at the last meeting, but o ID 0' w a w ro rt m ,4 'w P. P. w rt ID m K F°s 0 P. 0 m ID • 0 rt m 0 m 0" 0 HI En P. a P. H rt. hi En 1-h m H, ID N a .a rt, 0' ID r• m rt rt ID 'In P. o4 p H o 0 4 0 0 N 0 0 m 1 P. En P. G m 1n m £ 00 0' e m c0i H o ° ID IIDD m 0. En rt 4 h G' ,X' m rt P. P. ID rt ° ftt 0 N H° . ID rt 0 H '0 n ro ro n a 1C 0 rtN Enn x rNt FHQ', rt P. a ID 0 Fl 0 ,7. N ,' . (D ,4 LP m 10 "oo w m a 0 N rmt rt P. 0 o in ID 0 0' 1c a ro F1 10�y d rt 0 p' 0 N N a ID H ID o m In property line an additional 2'. a P. rt 0 G x ID m ID n 0 P. m rt 0 H 1< w I' ID 0 m ID rt b' a n x 1.n H 5 0 m £ ID rmr N N N N N N H H H H H H H H H H to iP W N H O l0 CO J. 01 lP a. W' N H O t0 co J O1 in 4, W N H P. °' H a w m m P. V 0 a o G' m 0 ID H. 0 m a cn w 0 0 a 4 HI rt m P. ID m H 0 G HI 4 m o ro 0' '00 5 N H. rt G H w - N 0 G .r• ..G .la m 5 P P. rt m P. w P. 0 ' rt :(D P. ,0 a ID H m, w 0 ... w ',Ix ID rt ,0 m H• 01 N m 0 10 1rt'• 0 Fh m H 0 rt 0 w a rt 0 0 H p ` ,p 0 rr 0 CJ P. N N P. tO 0. m 0� C) • m n G O 00 0 0 H a 0 G 0 0 H 0 ID ID G a rn m ER rt -r+ a 10 In m 1 it H o G p H• H rt 0 0 G a H g m p rt H rD ID p H 1 P. 'F3 NrtN D InroIND 0 '3 ft P. rt In 1" IIm 0(o7J 0 m' 0 rt wno D ID oD r0• Np a rt 0 ,C m KHW w N £ 0 d' rt En G 0 ,0o4 • ro P. m a m rtr•m 0 p rt 'd 0' 0 En (Dmty F{ • 13 0 N 0 N 0 N m En • n H 0 P. £ m o rt 0 • rt rt 0 0 n p m co P. H '0 H, rn rt 10 m o P. 4 d o h HI �0 ro 0 0 14rto 0 0 m ID 0' Er m n• Z N 0 r°s m rt P. rt m 0 a f D rr w r 0 'C 0• m 4 4 0 0 0 w 0 •N 0 CD H w F-' 0 N P. P. N H rt 0 I0 UD P. 0' N 4 H 0 0 P G' 4 m y m rt H ° rf N p, ID H p Fh N N 7r m N. 0 z 4 • a P. 0' p r°I, 0- 0 5 rt Ett 0 G ED it 0 0 0 0 P. G 0 CD m co H 0' '0 P. it P. a m m 0 H P. a o a P. 0' 5 I-, rt rt P. IA m 0 10 c ro N '0 4 o m N Gpa o N P. 11 0 '4 G I rt 1" u �' a 0 0 0 0 £ 4 m 0 o• 0 0 o G m H. 4 0 H 0' £ P. a a p H '4 0 rt 4 m H o m m G 0 rt 0 rt p• P. 0 a m rt w a m m m ID H G �n rt 0 0 m 0 ID' H 4 m N rt m 0 • 0 4 H it rt a m 0 4 ° FD a F°s m m a a 4 0 p P. ID LA rt -daTasow -sW 'nod xueuy That concludes Staff's report. We are here if you Desk Item; that was just revised at about 5:30 this 0 a 16171 Short Road." We apologize that didn't written consent of the property owners at 161 Short Road w a 0 ID rt 0 0 ID w 0 0 ID m ID a m rD rat 0 0 0 rt rn n rt 0 a 0. 0 10 ID N N N N N F' FA FA N F+ N -01 N F-. 0 l0 CO J 0) 01 01 W N N 0 l0 01 J 01 N r 0 m 0 H O rt ID (n r H I-, 0 NCA I °Gn Ca rf H 0 0 RCO m N cn •sagaT sn zog m rt • H. 0 rt a 0 H rt E rt. rt rt p' 0 10 • 0N 11 P. ]' 0 0 Di H-0 w ID rt CO rt 0 m N 0 (D 0 b' 0 ras P. rt r°t w w 1 ID r 0 r• H H ID 01 rat m a .0 0 0 K m ~c m m CD CO En E lo It K. m V P. a 0 P. w H 0 rt m k > 0 (D 01 01 a n 1-4 1< Q a oo r LP(00 3 P a rat 0' ro a a m H CI P Go Ili rt m o ° ras o is 00 0 h 0 to F. rt ro° Y 0 0 �" E N N 0 P. IS rt w (Ot 0 0 0 W rt C G rt a a o ,0 4 a rt rt m m rt O • N m uw, E m ID P. m m rt rn 0r a n m 0 m m O 'Fay N rt '.Y N O ry G 0 hi ((00 '0 Ft 0 w ro r .) a m m • ro m o m G r rt rf 0 Ti P1 N o• R. m 5 a r-0 rt 0 0 N• rot 00 p1 G a o Y. rt4 CD 0 m m 0 'C 0H rt En rD CD F{ ID N .J 0 rt X G O. Fi M £ p rt 0 0 . rt N M a' ID 0 rt Ox 0 ID P. r COP0 tY co G 0 P. HI rat 'C rn w • rt O X m I rt m m H rt tr m w E w a a 0 m 00 E 0 rrt m m rt ° 0• rt • CD0 H• 1q rt 0' o. m 01 0 r rt m E might recall, a couple of months ago you approved a project G O 0P. F. C P a En P. rt 0 ' V G I'd hi (0 n m P. 0 rt (CD CA N ,7 (D ro •• r m o rt CD a cat n N 0 a rf ro 0 iv (D G 00 • a 0 Pi ti Go(D rt 0 m rt o m rt En En o. property owners, and there have been a series of emails, discussions late this afternoon with the attorneys, the :daoxa H.lanr SO L r9 SO I rn N N N N N N - m H10 F.+ FA FA N (11 I 01 N F+ 0 t0 J 0) In 01 W N F+ 0 10 CO J 01 N an W N F+ second story portion further away. What that did is with so I narrowed it up, made it smaller, and pushed the w m 0 0 tn rt a0 H- 10 rt ° H• k P. 00 m rt ohi N• N 0 H • E E wn Di rt P. m Ft a E 0. x P. Cn N• m m P. P. o (0 m H o rf X ID a is K First of all, the views, which I think was the for everybody, but primarily for 120 Mary Way. N rrt 0 0 o m o (an 1y r p H W m w rt o 0 w rt a P. P P.o err H V7 P. O G rt m N a (n m ro ro E 0 0 H• 10 0 rto• (D Ehi 0 Fi m 0 0 a (D ti CD0 Co CO• P. 4 m 0 P rt N- rt hi 10 OZ 'neighbors at 120 Mary Way while at the same time not N I'• Ort rt n u. GGi a rt m E H. G rt 0 0 hi hi m x rn 0 0 rt F. N o m H rt m P• rt w w rt yr 0 0 rt ID N 0 0 two different designs and they determined in the end that w 0 0 rt 0 G (0 0 0 G m m E m w rt rt a o a P. p P. rt m (0 ros H• 01 0 H• CO rt k hit Co i r• (D 10 0 • 0 0 rD H• 0. LP and how it backs up to back yards. the zone district and because of the odd shape of the lot o N• G CD o (0 (D • m hi u H• C h K m • G P m w 0 ID r a P- ill 00•t w P rt o it x P. m er rt 0< P1 P. N C sreuorssi architect. From the last hearing we got all our complaints :5NIQ'IfydS SI'dH3 No N N N tor r {n W N r O ,D co J m u• W N r O (D m J d• UI Ja W N p. 0 aw rt 0 w H 0 5 0 0'0 p' £ rt rt rt P. N r• n rt (D 0 r CD P. 0 r• m w 0' 0 n to rt (D 0 N 0 H 0 0 rt '0 0 in N a rt 0 rt G r• H H N o '< N 0 (0 0' 4 rt rt rt H 0 H w H H 'C W 01 0 0 0' (D (D ' 0' 0. P. H 0 m a 0 a. '0 m o H H 0 4 n n r' H o (n a 0 (0 M H o 0 r• rt 0 rt 'C r• Hi �q 0 'G H 0 0 0 0 0 (D rt 0 rf F rf N rt 0 r• 0 x n £ 0 rt 0' H a 0 0 0 P. rf (n P. H (0 H [ 1 0' W a •H H hJ H 0 N '4 p• (D rt P. H a O 4 '4 4 m ca 0. -J m '4 ' w k w o o m a. o 0 m n m H w H 10 rn (0' w H d rt H, ro o' a rt 0 00 O p 0 (0 u, n) m m r 'd a 0' rt r• 0 0 V' rt 0 rt a 0 0 m 0 H H m rt 0' (0 rr a. a Hi En H. o Di-'o H M '6 rt m k w Fi (D0 0"'m ur, rt rf 0 rt rt m G rf G 0 0 w a r• H 'd £ 0 0 V 0' rf a. 0' w o PIm 4 H H H ( o m G ro m a m P. 0'a)ro � rt w "4 CD H a H (n r 0' 0 H x rt is 1 w p a)yyvv H (� £ 0 0 ro * £ 0' P. w W '�' Hi n n rf P. H p r• H, (D r• 0 a H (D (D rt n a N P. O rt '0' N (a H 0 rt '0 H x o c (D G m P. x • 0'o G 0, r• H n hi H 0 G rf a rt CD rt o ro o 0 w a)H (D (D H H w H 0 Hi b' H £ 0 d H mGZ1 0 (D 0 H r r• a G• a H w 0 G (o G o w 'C N I-' H P. w o 0 0 w p r• H a q (0 (o m m r• rt H Hi (0 Hi P. 't 0 H o H o 0 o H 0 N a' m m rf 0 P. Ph m (n H o p m a (o a. '4 r• (3' rt £ (0 P. (D (0 P.0' H H rt H G 0 a a 0rt (D 0 ' 0 a. 0 a 0 0 H 0 0. CD0' n G m rt 0 0' G O. o a d (Dm G N rr a a, w r• m 0 H M rt p 0 w 0 o 0' 0 G £ d Hrt rt ( G rt H (q 'd rt rt ni d o 0 cn a w o p w rt H 0 (D 0 a O w N '� (D p' k O (D N (o 0 'd 0 o °z H H H H H N p w H ro ( a •rt x rt P. a a, 0 "d (o 0 H C w rr a £ m H 0 co 0 V' H H rf 0 £ 0 * 0 0 't N a tY rt m o a N m rat d o m a w r p m o 0 o m H H m r• 0 b• r• G £ o rf K N P. ;U 0 o H w H r• £ 1-4W N 0 O £ o P. i u H a o G rf '0r 0 0 '0In H 0 N rt a a 0 rf InH o. 0 H rf •. rt 0 rn G o 0• 0 0 a 0' H V 0 £ H H co 0 -rf (D a r�' rt x a a Hi r• rt 7 (D H a rt r• 0 (D r• a• r• 'H ('• n N C H 0 H 0 r 0 In a rt a 0 rt 0 H rr (d v, (o (0 (D w r• £ d 0' o (0 a u, (0 (1 H (D rt rt u) rat 0, m o 0 H fH 0' H rt th rn k (D 0 00 14 puc d1 N N N N N Ul W N r O lD w J as Us ID m J as Us Ja W. N H r 0 m rt Hz No 0) Cl H 0 O HHi rto o CD co N N r o 0 0 0 (' 0 F.. .. H 0 0 0 ..0 0 N '0 �NF m 0 in 7n H Pi G 00 N N N. rt 0 0 0' rt N K. a. 0 rt n G m P. n rt CD 0 (D w ( a m 0 0 H w 0 r H o (n 5 h0'1 O 0. m H am prepared fully to participate. I would also like to 0 a F' x 0 o 0 H rt (rtD 0 0' '73 rf H N H 0 N• E a 0' m ro P. gH rt rf 0 H aH a. o (D CD 01 0 . H Fn-' ( r a a o P. 0 ;0 '(o 0 0 P. rtti (n 0 (D (D 0 0 0(D (0 H 0 0 P• r x H P. N £ N In lo-h 0 1.4 0 00'' (oi 0 0 G P. (D (7 O0 0. HN 0. 0 ti m 0' a x a o 'c o 1-1 0 r x 0• 4 En 0 P, (D G 0P. 00 0 rn r( rn• ( hi G En 0 0' m (0 (n a, P. rt m ro 0 rt 0 o o' PI'P rt H 0' m R. (D G (4 H. in hiw 0 k H0 0 (D p rat a •gbTp An Wax; uT25e second story: Then this is looking in the other direction, ,g' sT ologd 0 M Fh 0' 0 L0 0 0. £ N 0' P. rt m m "C m H 4 m t' O th 0 G H was taken towards that house, so the eye level here of this P. 0 N 1 0' 0 H m 0' 0 H 0 0 m N• 0 rf P. w a H a w m 0 01 rt 0 (0 rt m 0" Let me just show you a couple of photos very P. rt 0 P. 0 N 0•• rt a N H u, rt P. 0 N rt 0 U) 0 0 (D O 0 CD ID 0 (D 0 a w '4 N k 0 G rt 0 £ rt 0' a rt 0 G N smaller than 120 Mary Way even though our lot is three • lot, 30% smaller than what's allowed, and our house is 0 0 0 H P. £ (D r r m r' 0 £ 0 rt ch r 0 E m a 0 (0 0 co N N N N N N N I-+ N Fl f✓ F, F• F., F. N Ja W N N O t0 CO J m N 01 W N N 0 10 CO J 01 rr 01 lJ N F+ H r a co o rt 0 P. G 1 P• G `G k w a 0w rt rrr .0 rat 'C a z o rt a rt Co 0 P rrit voi 0 K �' m 0 0 £O Di P. a 0 H hi co rn 0 w G O O ti tf I0x rt 0 rt CD H0 (D otn P. 1 G F- rt rt H 0 01 0 a rr 5.• ,4 w0 H o cn 0 m '0 o a,a H, J H. rt o 0 ti 0 01 o N r r rt a) '0 a• rn a 0 N I-, H. rt P 4 `Q M it's shorter probably by about 8', but it's still footprint is a lot bigger and the roof climbs higher, so 0 a °G 0 0' (D 0 N Co 10 N W 0 0 rt rt a 0 rt ''C (D N G H) 0' 0 rt rt G CD o O J £ 10 0 0 01 Cn (Drt N 0 rt H0 a H. Fes. rt '*-G � 0 is a W 4 0 0 an r0 00 (D N-£ P. o £ m w rt a)zzo rr tY cD P. M t-lr0 'C 0 N (D 0, •• ID a a LA, m 0 0 01 0 P1 rt H a a rt rt ID co1,. 0rt 0 rt rt 01 a 1 a rH !D 0 w 0 Co N• •t3• rt rt tor. 0 (D 0 0 rn 5 is '4" 1< n a 0 0 0 0 0 FID 0 rii ft 01 H a rr+ rai rt a a 0 b' P1 0 CD (D a 0 :DNIQ'IRiiaS SI2IHo H rn HP CnH) a O O H O G G' o a a 'G m " d rt a 00 rt, W a ran IDD 0 (at £ rt rai rt P. G CO 4 a X 0 k w 0 0. S 0 0 0 G r• it ro rt G co W trri) a 0 rt 0 hi P1 0 1) 1c w a t4 ti 0 0 0 0 0 rt M 00 0 ID H 0 hS 00 0 zh. oz 01 rt r• G N. hi z a It w 0 r £ 0' • co0. 0 4 0 rt C CD 0 G G rat 0 N ti (D H 0 0)h0w0 0. (D10 0 w rt co -N ((D cofit 1 _ 0 H 1P. tt in P. H. 0 0 0 a P. aco 1< a rt H a 0 . o a rt ga sansst b-cq aqg go auo N N N N N N F' N N N A O ID CO J 01 N 01 IJ N F• O 10 CO J 01 10 •p 01 N F+ 0 r a r• rt 0 0 "d H 0 (] (n k a rt 0 Co a 0 'aC £ 0 0 G w H. m 0 a N a m m• rt is p 'c 0' r N H rt rt 0 (D Co o rop, 0 rt 0 rt Lnn o. ID o cat G m H 0 0 (D L~ £ n a G r• 10 0 w n N C) rt rt 0 HGHpH P1�tcl H rt ' ID P. N 3 0 10 tp r (D a r '4 a 0 rt 0 a H 0 Fp 7 w m a O N (D rn 0 (D m G £ a H y0 it ro 0 H. m tr' rt m C0 'G H W > t°i rt rt m 0 rn G a G' n o o (D k x' N rt a (o rt rt (D r• rn z 0 0 CD rt 'CI 0 r 0 • m a' £ N H. P. n a t.r ID GH N rt a £ p' r m to :v m (, Z 0 z rt 0 to a a t°t o 10 rt W rr-F r0 • r H • 0 01 a a 0 •rn o 10 p a 01 rt H ro £ G w rt 01 ' 0 a rt 0 m r r 0 (D 0 0 0 (D P1 0 0' H 'n hi H rt 'C cD o a a (D hi Co 01 Y. H. a CA 0 .0 `'i rt H N• 0 rt 0 0 (D o M N rat Co °O a H O a o rH/l o ti H• a G J FaH o 0 w t o m rt . R. co y m It H a (D hi H• rt rt H ((DD W 0 G' 0" Fa I. :a 7y Z 0 0 D' £ 0' X H.N F, rt ti ID m o o u. a CD 00 ct a 5 0 0 a m w 0 CD 01 0 coO rrtt k 0 rt C G' a P. a £ £ x R. p a• bH (D 0 • rt o P. ro a 0 N CD H m m r"r 0 l] N • rt 0 0 (D CO In M 0< 01 0• a 0 w CA (0o n 0 rt Co'0 0 10 ,0 0 rt a w Co. 0 £ (D a w rn rt m Co o H. ro R a "m w H a rt w to "' hi rt (D H. tS 0 '0'` rt rt H. 0 •J Pi rt a ID hh N m rt H. N 0 (D a r t rt a a () a showed the grading and drainage plan, which should be in :oNIQ'IQvas SIdHa ari burasaq gsaT aqg uT that this still addresses those problems. the drainage issues that were anticipated has not changed, just want to ensure with this design that's smaller that 0 m w (tip4 P- rt rt Cco 0 0rt w 0 rt m rf (D H. Do 0 (D (D 'a to a tai 4 co r- 0 a a H. £ 0 w I N 0rt H. Cn 'G Co m m a w pi- 0 H N N N N N H F+ F H . H U, is W N I' O l0 co J 0, V. Ja W N H O 0. W J cu lP (.0 N - 0 N a P. H 0 0 rt H 0 d 0 cn Co P. G)0 CD rt CD m ro 11 pp N R. 0 w N H P. Do rot N H H 0 � 0 En o t rto o z W N (D k N � o � rt < N CD P. (D P. a P. rt w N (D m 0 (D to 0 0 Fh co 0" (D11 (D 0 0 (-1- 0 rt H H (D rt 0 0 0 P. N N N P. H N r PA. 0 0 m z K 0 H CD °z (0 N 0 00 coP. 0 11 ID (D N 0 (0 0 p `Q H 0. H • H 0 P. '0 a a rt N you, Mr. Spaulding. The first speaker I'll be calling up is oozes EIFIHo cn 0 y � 0 rt7 H H CD 62 rt 0 co O k rt 111 •noir }[ueug 'dpi[O houses, not the bigger ones. what I heard was that it should be compatible with those rt C m 0 0 0 (0 H, w 0 m H, 0 0 (0 (D m N (0 H O H ti 0. N N• 0 • • rh f w rt is 1-1 N rt 0 H 00 co 0 tI a it; 0 N rt to have a house that they like. Also, if you look at the rt m 0 Di E 1-1 0 o • rt N n o ti ti"(0 • H G CD N rt 0 I N N 100 rt I rat H rrO th (D N 0 0 coo 0 co H 0 (0q 0 H 0 �t H H 0 rt rt I -,pa 0 P. '0 'C 0 1-4 CD 0 CD rt H N ,qw 0' H• N G N ro co rt rt N (0 • N 0 rt rt rt COMMISSIONER BOURGEOIS: What I'm getting at is H N '1 a '0 P. a 0 0 P.. c 0 (D H 0 to w M O I1 0 10 0. 0 0 0 0 G m ti 0 N N N N N N F' F• . N H 1' F' ,p to Ja W N . O l0 Co J 01 ll� CO N H O l0 COJ T lP W N 1� 0 N 1-3 H O n a\ N H tougher than a scale of 1" is to 16', which is your English the buildings to be 20% smaller and the conversion of N (0 0 rr (0 5 0 N N N Hi G 0. ti rt G (0 N '0 x x hi a m P. rt m m m w 0 n 0 P, m m ro0 0 rt 0 H m 0 m N o 0 0• (D M N 0 m rt H (0 '0 P' a co I-' N 0 10 N o 0 rt N. P. o m x 0. a 4 0 o s of thing. It's just not there. They keep comparing the rt m N m 0 (0 (1 m P. 0 0 0 0 ro a N 0 10 0 0 N• m 0. rt 0- P. 0, you s,;i •anssT auk st burpTrnq eq4 go 4116rau aqy still too close and is as 10'7" up to the code. that's like sitting in the same room in the house. It's 0, rt H• 0 N a N 0 J. N 7. rt uzl CD o w rar '0 r 0 0 0 0 1-1' 0 H N N P. ti t3 m 0 N• a rh X rt 0 R. ID '0 wort, CO1-1 0'0 N 00 a rt rt P. •r• m• 0' to a tat m• rt a CD H ((0 0' (,, G N. • N 0 N• P. C (D N 01 p 0 They have a covered porch setback of 10'7", which four different side yard setback n 15', and the setback is supposed to be 15', so I really am four different setback measurements: 10'7", Pup 'a rt w H 0 10 'o o a rrt 0 CD (D H H H m ( ID (D H 0"$ H 0 (Da 0' H (0 a 0. 'C ttow 0 N 0 N ° N I(D 11 N 1 rt (0 10. (-1- 0 N kC 0 (0 0 X 0ca 0 • G 0' cn N 0 N N ¢ 0 1-,rt LZ (/ H I'• 0H N rt N 0 00 rt 0 0 rt m k 1G1 a, 0. 0 H (0 0 w rt 0 nox •4a3ropd aqg have our attorney letter in your packet N N N N N N H r Y Y N W N Y O tD CO J at N Y r W N 0 t0 m J m last six years I've lost several of these trees due to what o x K rt HI m w a' (1 (D 0'rt rt • a N to O H to rf Fn C rt m w rt 0 0' 0. 0 m rf a (0 to N m rt 0 0 w rt(1,P rt w rrt ( H P., rt H- 0 (D E I PI 0 (D to a 4 It o 0 (D rt rt (IP( (D (D t-n E 0 0 'O hi o o m ro 0 ° 0 rf 1-1 (0 Fi (D • 0 m H (D x a °8rt D m (D F( m ID r( 0 0 0 b' 0' to a 0 (D x 16161 Short Road. The layout previously allowed views in mainly because the property sits 5' below the property at of the property. These plants were planted 50 pup obs salad H a rt (D H w H. 0 g 0 0 11 H E (D a' 0 to a Co d a rt (Dm (1 N 0 5 5 (D ro 0' a 0. 00 rt N R. (D xitk rf rt 0 0 m 0 Ft D' mm 0 x rt D m h 0 0 rt (D (D P1 a w 0 w x Ft o 0 ry 10 rt H. rf 00 m there are multiple letters in the file from the other the statement that the people from 120 Mary Way spoke, but at 120 Mary Way. I'd like to say that Mr. Spaulding made 0 m H H 0 0 z 3 N H. W 0 0 w H H H. 0 0 a H H 4 (D '0 0 0 0 •uosTTPW qog •noi xupuZ We are now down in the negative of 57%, so we have not a m 0 m (D (n a (D (D (D a "(D (0 IQ H. H. o 0 w O '0 (D o H. C rt m 0 R. HI (0 a 0 a rt m 1 (D H (0 d Fn (D H 0 d (D w (D w E i you have the actual height. the story poles, to go out and walk the site and make sure smaller, so we have to go by the story poles, to look at N N N N N N Y Y Y N iC W N r 0 ID CO J 01 fn 1C W N r 0 l0 CO J 01 (n 1G W N r a((o 0 - a• N• (0 (D 0 rt H O iQ 0 0 0 G 0. N 0 0 0 0 (D (D 0 Fi rf m H. H. rs .v H. t-, n 0 H. 10 w cn rp PIo 0 0 0'rh E a hi11 m 01 w F( 0 y x (n rf H IG-1 ((DD rt rHt vi 0 (D E N (�t 0 R ro G 00 0 0 w (D d. 0 H a a • N H H 0z(D0x(Dwrn G N-' aH 0 3 '0 0 G m 5 o m o ts m o a 0' m rf rf H M 'J (D . °"A 01 H. H. 0 ((DD �M a p o ti N kg a a (Ot N a. N H. 0 R. R. rn rt a a N H. (-( H• '11 rt 0 H H•'• Co 0 0 (D N H H w 0• 0 -h a 01 h 0 0 E 0. 0 kg H 0 a. P. ro FD (D co - 0 a 0 ra x m 0 P. to H. 0 0 H. rf O rf m the foothill is still obscured by this new plan. My g0 M5TA aqg g0 %09 N rf G 0 rt H (D a 0' E d 4 (D (D tr' 0 (D H. 0 (D w H. ID rt H. O w Hrt o a m aqg og apsm •seerg esogg moag a (D 0 H. O (0 ° rt FS (D (D m 0 0 0 rt 0' (D rf (1 rrt (D (D rf m H (D H. 0 ro a a n k on the northeast corner of our property. These are all rt x (D M (D E w (0 a 0 o 0 rt E 1-h 0 rt (D rt to H- O rt 0 0 R. rr '0 1-1 a (D (D 0 rn O. 04 H. (D rf H. H 0 rt (D rocn H. 00- 0 rt k •satgaadosd D 'C a N o 0 M P. o (0 (D art, 0. rt P. H, rt fp 4 P. a m rt • H rt rf o H P. H 0 0 0 (OD rat H. ID 0 N(0 p (D x n (D E 0 0 (0 dead tree out as soon as possible; there is no treatment. can be done with the bark beetle they said is to get the the arborists say is a bark beetle and the only thing that N N N N H H H '.' H H to 4 W N H O 1p m J OI (n W N H O 0 CO J Ol V' W N H N. FOs w rt (I)rrr rwr (7' m O (O-' 00 0 N • Itm m G m a r N (D a N• O 0 (2 (D 0 LC G rt DI C•D0 rt 0 H (D rt 0 N. N 'G 0 rt °w o (D 000 (P1p� 0 0 ro hi, m F' '4' lT 1m'• 0. 0 0 0 II b o rt N k m r H a a rt o' (n (1 4 r G) '0 rrtt n 4 N N Cr, p. Hen 0 n co a IA N 0 LC fn '0 '4 a P. 0 0 CO Ert p" P. 4 '4 Hai b H Frrt ID '• 0 4 rt to 0 H,orn rtH rt m' fy '4 1-4 rt I--' z a rt N• w m 0• P• N m a N a N a 4 n0 0. F4' (Da a p. O n N O E H, .7 ri o rt HN m rt rt H c+ 0' 0' it w 4 P. p. (1 o rat` rt rt i7 CDCA 0 rt G 0 rt b' r m 01 They've lived in Los Gatos and they have worked in Los r w a 0, o '4 rt 0 It 0 en rt w (D H coo rat V w w a 0 • H N '0 x '4 rt (0 CD 13) N 0 0 H 0 rt rt '0 a m w o 0 0 SI 1-1 M 6 (0) H in N N R. 1'h '4 4 N O it (D m 4' N rt P. W 0 0'O o 0 m r( G P. 5 'd m G 0 rt H rt � 0 0 0 H1 hi H m their way, but then I'm a realtor and I'd be happy to sell 0 rt rt h o b' o N ON 0 i '4 w a fn o (D0 4 b' H '4 (D r (n (D o (0 a 2 0 a rh '0 4 H 0 • G b' w m tr G w rt '4 N a P• a m a 40 o N rr G rt o '4 H 0' N P. D rt o p N N • '. rt (n r a N 0 '0 m 0r a (D w rt a 0 '4 L a 4- 00 E 0 0 rt. 2. G P. G '4 4 m H1 m anod ;2114 ptra saapun job is to mitigate that and to look at a-' n m r a 0 w 0 m 0 0 4 rt w '4 m 0 N m 0 It it Hi rt (1 Hot 0 N 'C0. H'• N m m rt (D m mO -' '4 ((0 F'• (D H a• 0 w 0 N (A 0) N (D 1-h H 0 00 0 -1 a 0 H N 0 00 rt 0 x a 0. rt a F. H (D m n cct 0 m .40000 E w r• (D G LP 0 SD P. 0 (0 (i' a 0 rt h H G r"r 4 P• w a "0N• r4D 0tr w 1-0G '4 o(n m of m (DC1 0 a N N N N N N H H H H 1, H H H N W N H O l0 m J 0,0 W N H o 0 Co J O1 W Ja W N 0 0 b• Fh '(0 '4 a 0" H H rt 0 rt b' a w 0 0 E 0 0 G a G 0 0 (D 0' w E O 0 00 m ( 0 g a• 0 rr G H0' (0 (D0 0 G a a G F• (D (D • CD rt rt m a m ( '0 a (0 H 0 rt rt a• 0' -0 4 r Hh P 0 .2. rn w m ('- ''q a• - : rt - 0 _..{v (D ' ' a - rt rt m Hi O rt o '0 4 '4 H 0 a o m m 0 a 0 rt m H w m W .. b' ro rt m Hi w r H H • m 0 (n rt rh rt E 0 N a ri 14 4 N '4 w E o a 0w G 0 • 0 0' a• 0 rt rt N . 04 a '4 Ht m 0 (4 ro rt 'a' O M. H r( V co 0o G CD o rt en m 0' (D H' w 0 G W' F. 0 w G I-,rt G x a• 0 a rt N 0 G. N '4 N P. 0 0 (n 'C w r 0 '2• ( rt 5 0. 0 m 0 m 0 K. G G) 0 a a rt b' rt p m rr (n '4 (D a)G w 'q r P. r 4 4 o w 0 (Db CD (Da Fria r rt 0. 0 a y a (D4 m r1 0 0 4 0 CD0 E r rh 0' 0 Ht a m N fn a 0 m H 0 '4 a m '-4 0 m 0' HI a it 0 W b' rt m m '4 0" HS '4 ro 0 Fi H1 a H1 r va m o m a m w E 0 r G '4 m 0' '0 4 m a ro 0 a a• 0 rn '4 in 1 H. a G (D •o o rt m m m 0 rt G 0 a 0 0 i G rt ro 0 o a b' hi rt rt p m n G 0 H+ Hn x m m o rt E. r H 0 rt (Dri w (D (D0 m r 0 m rt ,z H, ro H'• ro m 0' Hh O 0 m rt w rt n (D (D 0" • H G rt m P.,0 ro 0 r 0 a 0 0' a• rt CD I.-, w o 4 (D r1 D CD4 4. 0 0 a rt E (D 0" '4 o a ro w an hi m H1 a rt 0 'd m rt 14 0 0 N• p' 2. (0 r (0 (n • rt G rt 'q 0 m 0 rt (0 4 0 a m a 'd • P. 0 a• • r- O 0 m 0 a• r w Co 0 0 Or td (D a 0 0 ro a• w w 0 w 0 m w b rt E rt 0 H G o rt q b m r rt m 4 m rt '4 G b• x '0 rt 0 0 m m rt b' m a o ai rt r• a m r 0' a• Hi a rt a• N 0 rt .0• r rt '0 CD H O• (0 G rt N 0 F. a a 0 N fn ((0 0 a u. '4 0 0 E r H ¢' H 0 W rh O rt '4 H b' rt H (n a• G O II, 0 O' • rt 0 a• '4 0' 0 a Z Ht E a)rt O G '4' G N 0 a G a (n 0 0 O a a HI a a• rt 0 H-, r H. m W a G 4 Hr t 0 H '0 rt (0 m G a G) G X' 0 m m 4 0 a P. cortH1 r (Dp' a m '0 a o a• x a 'q '4 E 0• o m o rt 0 0 0 4 0 m o a• rt 4 a rt a a 'O W p rt a o o (4 1-' m m G r 0 0 rt G r (i a a 4 rt (n a w rn r m N rh 0' N m E rt o rt m is k x H' w rt rat F. w m G o E O a rat' H N 0 0 ('• a a p ro r 0 ", P k w p 0 n rt • a G G 0 r 0 0 (q K7 m r rt 0 rrt o • rt 0' g 4 rt rt r 0 P. G m '4 rt G 0 rt a H V a• '0 0 0 0 m 0 w 0' m a y 0' N rt rt a rt rt r N 0 rt rt rt m rt 0 (I) (Drr 0' 0' rt IDr• DV0' a• r 0 H1 r• a• I-.0' a• m 0 rt 4 a 0 0 0 m 0 0 4 a• (n w rt 0 m a m a rt 0 (n 1-1 N 0 a a• N rt H a Y.' a• N• r rn 0 :NOSUaQNV KIDIUIVa that's all well and good, but people still do have a right 3 N N N N N N - Y 1-+ H H H V N H H U1 :n W N H 0 l0 Co J 01 rn 01 W N F+ O l0 61 J Ol (n :n W N F+ 0 00 00 rt ,0w (0 (0 H co rf t arh w ° 0 0 rt r rotCo0) o Co0 0 ra '1 �+ 0 m o H 0 o '4 0 W, cn G IC H rt m 0 0 0 w •0• 5 ro . � 0 0 rt rz ft y rt,-. H H (z �' G 1 rt-(D �C FqG'• H w m N 0.' rt H 0 • 4C 0 rt to H cn '°� P• CY rt• 0 H R: a E (0 01 w 0 0 CDh CD G tJ rn x rt rt H rt G G 0 H o• z ro 10 k aH G R. 0 w aN 0 , 0 '0 H AYH,'• ,p rt o. H• rt o. (D N 0 0 '.0' 0 'C H.,kg w 0 J G H rrh N H N rt 11, 00 ID m• 0 rt o H 0 G 0 0 x is noA address, because it does impact our solar access, which is 0 tn m 0 x w rt 5 0 w 0 0 0 01 0 m 0 0 rt H 0 G H a m 0 G rt 0 be blocked due to their structure, especially in the so that's one section of our yard that gets sun that would our back yard that gets sunlight. Due to our other be our back yard, which happens to be the only portion of w rn P. M H. 0 0 rt 1Gc m 0' w a 0 O co 01 0 w 0 111 P. m 0 rh rt G 0 hi G' a a (0 P. o 4<Q' V row rt H (D 0 a 0 0 rt rt no 0 0 V s 0 rn N '0 0 0 w o E (0 m °m m 0 m ro a) 0 rwt 'J (D G DI rt w H rrt th H (0 ro rt 0 •. 0 0 0 E G m •2TT3 uo 007CHS 2iIFZF?D G o t7 H. rt r N 0 0 0 rwr wrs w z a R. rOr m rt m rt 01 D N 11 N 0 ti ly rrt G H 0 0 w bur;aam eu N N N N N In :n W N 0 N H 1- 0 l0 m F• N H N H 1-• N FJ J m /n Ja 13 N 01 0 l0 CO J Ol to :G W N F+ • (01(y 00 ° H. rt o a N _ . f 0 •10 .0. ro `00" H rt 0 N 0 .N H - O• 0 (0 0 'rt H. (D 0 01 w '•C rt N rh 61 00 0 0 H H.ft 0 M H p no ca rtrt 0 d In rt W N N0 0 0' - X rrt ro co O H H• (D hi or0(0 m r 0 n 0 44 0 rGt rt t, 0 ro G 0 0 0 m m H1 0 0 N P°1 0 roH 0 rt M 0 '.4 N 1-1 0N H. N o. • Fh a.0 G) M o. rt ,00 C� H z 0tn 1' N (D 0 N `(D i0Y 0 co 0 (Hn 0 u w ro (0 w a h CD ro w w 0 (D x zz H tD 00 01 a N NJ ° rt ( w H u• H 0 co (Do• N N N. H IQ N rrh rt a, rt 0. 00 o rt N 0 0 rt b 8 o w H N 0 0 r-t 01 0 tY H 0 E 0 rt (ID (D rt (0 Q 0 0ro (n H H. N (D 0 N 0 0t '0 rt m double deep lot, which doesn't exactly show on this. Oh is directly adjacent to the property because I have a •AeM disys 8ZI gp 511TaNSMS VGNIU m rt N 0 (0 w CD H. 0 w 00 010 k 0 m rt w 0 x 0 G 0 • w o x N 'C G rt 0 ro - m w (0 m H. N 0 N a 0 redwoods on this property as well. So that's what I wanted because of redwoods. They have redwoods here and there are this section right here is the only part that gets sun, study. So it's covering this half of our back yard, and Way, and then this is our back yard, and this is the shadow N N N N 1-' In W N O lD m J 0 N W N H O lD m J N u, 0 cn H O rt ED tcl rz NO No H 0 US cn cc't H o A, co 4. HH building and its use will be compatible with the tn 0 n 0 0 M R rt Fh O rt (D ( H • 0, N 0 W Ft 0 0 F. a a 0 rt a 0 rt (D 9 H N 00 k N N• FS a7 5 N 0 Wn rt r°n 0 m 8 0 ft a '4 (D0 o 0'0 G 0 {Ft 0(D 'a L rP. G• rt O I'• r H �t 0pG w 8 00. rt K Pa ro (D (D 0 r rt of Ordinances, and it's 29.10.265, there is a reference to apoO auq UT asEO qrq: uI rt a rt 0 8 m m a M 0 H a r 0 P. 9 • H (D m is m H m 0 m Ft Ps d• It does not comply with the different size width and length w w 0 N '4 0 LP Ft F dNN • H H. R(D N o H G(D N 'CI P. H, a a. N a7 Lrt7 Yt • rt 0 to P. 0 o (DN• 4 0 • 0 0 0 H F'• (D 0• a N 0 0 a H 0 tr V w rt 0 (D (D rt • x tr rt P. 4 a rt 0 w w 0 � 0 ID 0 m atr 0' w 1-1 0 0 (D rt 0 rt N a rt H rt N N rt Oa En I-+• H �a rt 00'' (D '� o N qG a £ 00 rt rt 0 £ N 0 p d • 4 o 0 0 0 N rt G'a. p. r(i, 0 P. 7:1 a co rt (D (0 H. 0 H 0 r � (D m a '0 0 N U rt o a a 00 0 rt to a m N fn 6 w 0 r• rt a 0 P. r a o a 0 rt a co m 0 a rt 0 m W access of their neighbors. So although you may think that 0 G t'• G P. rt P. Si (D (D l(0-'. N. P. (D N N N (3, p, H w £' N (a P. n rt (D rt 0 rt M 4 N '4 £ N ro a '4 H rt p ra( CD O fn U (D rt 0G N (D rt rt 0 p' m £ N• (D4 0 a a 0 r P. ti 0 w 0 a rtm p 'C G' 0 '< • w 0 a 0 0. 0 x Lt (n p' £ N G I(D N P. Y. that what it states? And if so, the Residential Design N N N N N N F' H UI 'C W N H O 1p aD J Ol N Ja W 0, J O\ !n J> W N H x 9' (D(D 'w• .0' rt11, rt 0 0 tn O 0 £ £ (Ht m g E • g ro 0 9' (D (D o G 6 m w 0 0 0 ro o 0 0 r• m k P. rt rt 0 (D oo 'e rt rt 0 H rz F' N0 H 0 Us 1-1 rr H 0 Ps co N 'A N 0 That shadow quickly moves off that house. At this angle IDtr 0 F "• `D -.0 rt 11 ID rt m r 0 rt"3 rt0(ID rt (0 tt rt g m • co m r o0 rt x N vHi • t°f 0) rt r (D 0) o (D 0 w 0,• rat m 0 H m (n rt rt 0 •'�• N 0 (D 0 • G 0 pr, 13 a H 0 a a rt x H m w • ID rt rt 0 t°i En ft 0 oR, G o 0 G r a a £ 0 °a £ 0 o 0 0 4 N 0 tD co 0 m (D o a M " rt 0 G 'U rt rt rt P. 11 0 0 cl- m k rt rt 0 N 0 o 0 N ri"5' 0 • rt (D interested get three minutes, and then the Applicant again 00 G N• 0 •N '0 - P• . N• '0 tas m9a 0. 0 0' • rtrt 0 '0 m p w y k rtP. Ps En a x a rt rat 0 0 x 0 0 (D G ' ro H 1'• (D 0 n (n O rt ti '0 (D 0 0 P. (D m G 0 h m issues. I do have two other cards here, but these are w °a4p Hw rt 0G, P. rt rt M 0 {" w 0'0H• (ID N w rat 'c rat 0 rt(D 0 N II ID a G H 0 N Eh £ H k 1-1 Ps 0 H H N 0) w P. (D rt 9' W rt k 00 P. p. a ro 4 (D ° O A ft (D Fat m 0 0 ID (o u m V m P. 'c (n 0 m a 0 x • F. M a x' 0 rt 0 m hi hi G Ft 0• 0 W N• a R. rt n 0 •o 0 0. aG 0 'e r(t' 0 N 0 0 ti • 0 0 m rt (D ran w m a 'c G (n rt R. 4 ID ''(DDD °J 0 H 'C 00 'C P. 0 w x m o rat 0 0 hi w rt a '< rt 4 m '0 0 N m G n 0 I-.0 r £ N H N N N N N N t+ y., In W N F' O 10 30 J 01 (0 �G W N O l0 O J 01 (0 W N - 0 0 H 0 4 Fh (4 H I-, ar a. '0 0 0 CD ° 0 hi 0 a w m 0 H0,W tot 0 I-,rt 0 o O 0• N D.,0 • P. N m H. CO r n N 0 N '0 G W :t G a rt 0 M y rt PP'G rt F4 m rt H. H 0 N nn 0 CD (D hi Ui Ft CD rt [n rt Ft rtt 0. 1�j Con r rt t-1 9. P. a P. 0 0 (D P. �z CD rt 0 0 m ro H 9�' ' 7 o N ~ IH-' 0 G 0 rt m Co P. w 0 H G] a H a F'h 0 rt F, r- N nO 0 0 N P. G 0 • C 0 a(0 0 g t.i m ro HI 0 n'En a a G G 0 m G 0 5 rt H CI) r. (D O a a O '0 rt N 0 p� 0 (D rt N (D z 0 a 0 p 0 • 0 0 hi R• I j 0 N N•wpg a rt rt rt ro a, co thI rt hi N 0 hil (roD (oD (1 a m a Pi m o 0, 0 a to (0 0 0. (i • N w S w Ph 'c CD H rtP. Gcl. rt 0 rt rt rt H. rt (0 0 . rt N a rt w 0 m 0 0 'c Pi with John and Elvie Scott. I helped them buy the property. z 0 0 ID rt0 (D (0 En rt 0 CD 0 P.P. • 0 HPi 0 N 0' rh G M H k R w Co w 0 8 H 8 a ro rt m co CO rt rt 0 'c 0 ((DD 0 w n P. 0. a P. rat W m P. known John and Elvie Scott for 25 years. I've been a Los 30 H • 9 bi 0 ct N. P. w 0 P. H m -nod xuegy -zooT; aqg aPao TT,I story only actually would block 30% of their view, not 60%. P. aP. o r• 0 11, eh b' 0 0. ct CD H -4 N N 1 0 '0 H C o 0 0 0 0 0 w a (D rt o 0 0 a w � D 0 DOr, N p rt 0 N• N 0 `w N 0" m E w W rt rt 0 H 0 0 0 n m 0 0 0 a suosTTT8H •dep aqg go gsaz aqg zog 0 0 rt cn 0 G (D 0. rt a rt a G rt m 0 11 P. (0 rt N rt to 0 0 0 0 a 0 worst day of the year. Soon after the shadow is no longer 10:00am in the morning that it's no longer shaded in the N 3 N W O (0 N N N F+ m I- N N H N 1-� J O> 01 W N 1-� 0 10 00 -4 0\ (0 30 W N 0) 0 0 0'0 w a S 0 hh 0 (0li n 0 rt 0 En a rt 0 N CDrt H 0 °� a ,.G'0 H 0 N • o co z H hi H z '< G rn 0 1. a H n a rt H 0 10 m 0 0 H rtH 'Q w rt N N angle at 9:O0am on December 21st is like that, and then the H rt Co' P. K m 0 rt • (0 O rt a rt ,�. Cort 0 (- rt 0 a x 0 '0 m (-n 0 9 0 o 0 ur spuaTq TIP dT pua 00:0T back up. Do you happen to have a highlighter? You indicated of Mr. Spaulding, and if you could put op I dTTengoZ zszaxeeds guaoTTddh aqd go overlooking the property. That is exactly the view of the they only would be able to look at approximately 3-4' of co a d G CD • (0 0. `< P. 0 0 G a 0 G rt 'q (t rt a (D co 0' h u, a (q m co r• U. 'q m 0 rt ( 0 H 'o 0 rt o 0 0 0 m rt LG H r• 0 .7 M (0 w 0 rt G 0 14 at 0i H 0. rt PP. 'G 0 m 2 Cypress hedges that prevents them from looking at any w o ' 0 a 8 P. 0 rt 0 rt • 0. a 1-3 `t H((DD (D P. P.r• Co % 7' r3t 30 0 8 n 0 0s O w rt N 30 w 01 w K 0 a is almost below what it is at N N N N N N r F' H 1-• 0, in W N H 0 10 co -.Im U 4, N H O 1D Co J m lP W N F• 0 O hi N £ 0 a r• fn O rt (DD l7 rf ", a' H a N ,-40a r01 t b rt h H 0 10 a rr+ ID H. 'C. tH.• 0 w• J 'C G 0 CD 4 N• rt S. 3 app, xn r. nx n ID 0' 00 n n rar n a 0cn D, fl. a• H H 0 'H0 a 0'H 'H In N 1 o cn H O N yc' g 'b (0 SHv P (`• a b N CD (rt 0 ID 4 x' 14 m E 0 1a rf 0 a ro a O a O . t7 `n •00 rt Ia-� ';rfs' d 0 0 100 t-� G rt • M H a 0 H H H H rf rf 1C M H 4? N O Co) 0 •'n• 0 • 0• H z `4 1 0 a H 0 o p cr,H n a G' 0 Ha co 0 0 rf rt 10 Cr) n PI 0 0 M 4 P. rt m '�srf' a a IDD UI 0' H ID 0. X 4 r. o ayR. H o 8 V tD " rt u) 0 FS o 0 rtart a. 0 m ID V `G `� a 00' 0 a 10-1 a P 0 o z0 "' "' 0 r wr 8 r• "' a 0 w x co a co N. N p•CO H V H N O., ~ P 0 HG0aart . i 0 N a�0N J' EE cp 0 r• N �`N IDaH rt rF 0 HI N r• r• 0 0 ..a rt r• 0 10 0 0 0 (A 0 0 0 0• 0. N P. 0 0 0a H 0' rt o a. P P G 0 10 0 N H 0 W a CD H G N 0 H a rD • to tt W 0 ro 0N aa r 13'a w ID 'e rt 0 K 0 ID rt 0 a 0 rwr 0. 11 (0 m a 0 H1 0 0 P. 0 H a a 0• 0 m w E ro. mo{ O 0 1a I.4 rt I 0 H H, 0 rp 1q w roe t m 0 rt 0HD 13 0 H rt 10 LID 0 0 11 0. 0. ID E 1n • o C 13 1D H CD a 0 0 o 0 o ' ry O N 4 r o N N N N N N H f' - F+ M• F' U1 W N 1-•' 0 10 W J 01 U .0 H H H O t0 CO -4 01 U W N F' CD 0k G' 0 n rt o x 0 x rt w 0 10 F.,o m 0 0 0 rn 0 0• w 0' (0 0 I11 G 1qP. 0 rt N £ ¢• 0 • N ,::... '.' N. v, �.,• _ O .�.• ;;'�' a ID • rat' .,,rt (D 01 N E r• 0 0 0 a 0 G •rt R P. ._r. co H o 0 G. N H 0 0 w O. 0 rt W 0 0- 0 '4 13 m N I n p . G 4 rr 0 I rt N n 0 yr 11 n ID m n ro r 0' 0 00 r• n a 0 0 rf CY o xx r• 0 0. H H 0 0 w 0 rt O O' w 0 x d N ,�$$ m H E rt H 0 G' o G rt 13 H W 0 .�S (0 •- H rt H w- H G N . G] 1n £H rn 5 H 0 7J r• 0 fn H k r• '� rt ID •...) 0 0 VJ G w 0 H G H 0 0 m m r• ID m H 0 O G rf H w 'C 14 (7 - E cHNF 0 0 F, 0 H h1 10 H 10 '4 • b 0 4 Ji 0 O 0 0. ' O 0 oC 0 m 0 0 G'' G P. o-C G B G a,z aa 0 0 0 0 0 H,0 b o • 0 0 I-,b, H p tf r v rt [� r• rt n p 0 E a E 0 a H a, 0 0 rt E w 0' rt O 1 H a H 0 co 0"rf N H. 5 'J' £ tr H P. r m (0 ro 0 bt H 0 rt G a r• 0 10 r o O 0 o ,p H H. a 0 GD 0 4 rt ti H b` 0 0 •• 0 w 0 G 0 H' 10 H •• �• ID �' o a rnG co 0 n rt n co a 4 rt E w a w 0 H co t+1 n o fh a Y, H. a H H 0 r• G a I o 0 rt p o rt co r o � E w 4 rt F.-' n (0 H H O 0 H r• 14 E r 0 ID r• w (D ,0� o 0 N cn p G H' H R• ID 0 O CO o V. H 0 0 rf 10 E tY E o b H G rt 0 '4 rr r o 0' G o 0 0 H 0' p 0 w H 4 0 rt 1y rt G rn H H rt H 0 a G' '4 G H1 0' 0 H 0 ID rr a H 0 w rr u, w 0' r• a E a o z a rt o rt a rt r rf m 0 '0 ro rt 0 a rt rr E 0 rt a 1n E x H G 'd 0 rr a co ' o H, o 51 o rt a H H 0' 0 G V1 0 rt G m co o 0 o w F w 0 ro E 0• 1-' G rD a G ' 0 rn m 0 a 0 r w ID 0 a a x ,'3 H 0 Do 0 a a G H rt Si u, rt w 0 0 ee H H N 0. m a 0 w �• 1n H I 0 a r' R 1.t. F' w ry a O ~ r"' rN1� rt co rt `C G V H 0 G r• tr 0 0. E w a u, r m tr P. u 0 'C 0 0 1 rt •d • 0. Ino 0 rn C 0r O r 1D OH 0 II-,0 r 0 0 H rt ID G ,.4 Y. 0 O 1N to 0 rt .A SP CHRIS SPAULDING: Yes. The roof height of an all co ro 0 0 0 0 m 0. a a H tr• 0 H. m m 0 G 1n P• rt a 0 H d rt w• H 0 N a tr• 0 N N N 0N+H CO ~ H H H 0 WOt N W N H O lD CO J 61 (fi m W N H 0 0 O0 01 0 rrt Et 0. N a rt 004 N g E N r"r• w a 0 to a `C a o m ID r• r�r rtP3 w rt 11 N $ G F' rt 0 rt tail N N H 0 G G r• o rt to E w 0 a o P. G' H ro a 0 .0 a rt G rt 0 a rt G m a • m ~' rt rt a ,< o a to rn a x o 0 Hh 0 0 rai r0 r- N t7 P. 0' rn1 rt 0 x m 1t m p N m a 0 i- rat a rt H Pw 0 b' 8 a o H a a r G. P. G. w rwn ro �0, m a rt N ''zn ras 00 N a 0 H < o 0 z b rt rt a rt rt n a (0 0 w H H-, k 0 a G 1< 0 O 0• a G G 11 11 0 0 N m • N np 0 a 0 0 Hn Hp (Gn rt ~ P m Cr)�, 0 a 00 ry ;D to 0 0G. O Y. p o EHn w a 0 r• rt a HN'• m tr rt o rt En H fn rt N. rt rt .O' R• oo• a rt o z 2 r• a G ras rat a to G N G a rn o.. r* 111 I-, �' p 0 rt rt .-+ a 0 0 r- 0' w to a a 0 r 0' C 0aiv 0 "ro aP3 M a rt o0 Cu0 m rt w rt rt. 1 rG G • 2 W rt G rt 0 H a rt G..ro N ED a a N m w a a r- a rt -1 0 0 to P. 0 r• i2 tD J S 'C rt 0 to rt I think it's a very difficult lot. It's not a lot thoughts, because I really want to hear what people have to n to op m 0 0 G to G Frt r- tn W 0 10 rt r• p it rat rt 0 P ro O o G G n H o 0 w o a rt P. 0 m U a a ti H0 0 o oy ci- a 1-h M rt rt rt CO 0 Hh H 0 rl 0 p' h0 P. G - o rt 0 a H rt rt tit 0 H 10 E0 m 0 0 g' H HI 0 a 0 x a 0 a a ,.0 '0 n- 0 fr 0 cn H 0 0 0 n 0 x SAYOC: Any other questions? Okay, thank :5NITInVaS SIdHO 1-3 a 0 0 co r 0 0 rt a H 5 0 rt 0 G rr En N N N HHHH H H H N W N H O lD Ul J 01 In iC W N H O lD CO J 03 N 03 W N H 0 0 m H rt CD ~z H 'LH. rn O H N0 H rt H 0 o Cu"- N N H m careful to do what we asked them to do and they've the Applicant has done here, and I think they've been very rt 0 G Sa robaart 0 mwoN0art a aortrt GrtIa m oa a N0 o a m Gm U. o" 0 x a mo rrt R. p, o . WWma m h 0 0 0 a rtn r'0 0x aU mm N H t1< O F- P. Pi a,N0 11O0 coIll • a rG+ co 0 o to ro rt m m m N. a a 0] ro p 0 m a a 11 0 H¢ca� trt mt- 00 H P. 0a G GI 0 0' HI co 0 r7Graco aH0 UF'• rt U a0 Za H o rt pO 7aa H 0 rt "P3 rt rt rt N a 0 P- O N P rt b 0. a o w w p 0 10 o m G G a a c,1. G rt H P3 a N m a tan m 0 m P. a a r- a rt 0 00 o rt rr P. x x P. 0 ro+ * 0 a En'p 11 N• a Q. 0 ri Has O Dni . NO a O 00 0 0' 4�i 0 w 0 a 0 a a 4 P N 01 C to rt W 1 rat a 0 Hn o H a a o 0 to a rt a 0' rn p 0 a R• P3 a 0 0 N 0 rt rn rt rt rt C1' 0 �' a `a O rt FOs N 10 N H I-' N m 01 to 0 rt (Gn Q rt a ro 0 rt m 0 m0 0 •m 0 E a 0 m Hr 0 0 CD o G 0 0 k pi a p .. . , - G tr' to 0 0 rt b' 0 w rt r• a N• m H rt m a cn a w a rat N h tY r S ' 4 m 0 0 a 0 '< N h a N a an a a y rt r• a� 7 H rt a w Et CD o.frt', HA a G' a rt and that's why I'm looking for some help from my fellow trying to do this, and I'm between a rock and a hard place, z 7 N N N N N N H H H H H H H F, H A W N H o to 0o J T In in W N HO to co J 0 N Ja W N H 0 rt IP o ID rt • H En m rt 0 o to H rt PO co rf m 0 iv r • z O 0 H 0) 00 0 10 p EA O. P. rt q 0" H • 0 rt N rt P rt HE H .V H 0. :-' rt°rt mmHHwrtrt• rmd'rf 421i; sntd+,og being an unobstructed view of the hillside. I'm not sure at 0 rt b O hi rt rt 0 ti N 0H rt 4 ID t4 P. 4 m g' rt rf m ti rt H rt w 0 00 txo rt o rwr p. o rt m N• 0 a ,-C 'C t m o fD rn I-h n a' w ¢ rt N. wrn tp V' 0 H ggS iuozg ob Et 0 • rn 0 0 ti ¢ rt ro rt 0 H H hh .rt w H 0 d m N 0 G P. DE CD F4 00 m P. rt 0 In 0 m a d DE a q 0"i 0. 0 4 En 0 m rt p Pt a 0 M N o N rrr $ c m a rt 0' N fD 0 rt 4 tr 1 m P. 4 rt 0 0 N 'C m N rt y 0' N m 0 r m m 0 tY N• ..rt UD ht. m EQ 4. 0 0 0 a V 0 x o o '0 m =sIo392inog 2umolssiwoo o} pus; I that you'd like to share? Co •s?oabznog zauozss 0 5 M m 0 P. P. 0 w0 N to DE 4000 0 P. rf PEEn 0 PE 0-DXC H r) 0' 0 r rt• H rc a P.n rt En ,m w ro En Pi 0 a 0w °5 �• n PE J tq t5' N tp ,1 co r m rf N• o m m rtn P. ti m a '0 r0 t 0 to m ( 1'• H rt hh rt 0 a 0 o 0 m a rt rt 0'' P. a o a (0 rwt K. '4 w 0 ID to m a hi 0 to 11 '4 m a 'b a m o rf H o 1- 0 b .. '0 H. P. rtrr3 rt 0 0 En 4 N. V m PE rt (0 0 En rt En m w a w 0 m w ° m K m rt is this property for the neighbors. m ro a 0 m ¢ rt O 1: w 0 13 i N 0 O N '•C a K 0 m a E 0 En ri tD 0 rr 0 0 0 N N N N N N H H H H H H H H H !P ie W N H O to m —1 rn In W N H O 0 Co J m N W N H rn cn m m m H 0 0 n 0 0' En rt rt hi w hi 0 a 0 0 ( G rt rt 0. • a 0 4 k m Hm m oN• Pi 0 0 rt 0' 4 O a 0 hi 'rod HI to H N rt rt Ii 0 w 4 w rt o N V rt a P. w w •0 5F¢''h R. p r a 00' m O ER '4 r0r a hh14-'. m m p a V P. m • z rr w a 7 W irt 0 H 'Nrt N 00N NP. N o O' a N H rt 0N 0 N. rrt m rt : H• 1 0 0. d- in _ PE 0 Eno' 0 DE w m rt N rt 0. hi H. rt H rt P.y. �. k V 0-a 00 0 z a m rmi 0 m p m K 0 a °D rn w m rt 31 o• P.rt N a.0' oa O 1 m a H a \ m 0 m to HN 0.'CD h wd rt co rt 0 O N 4,/'4 '0b 1-4 1-, r m o rnt o oG mi tN P. w~s. w a NP. m 'G 0 m 'F '0 m rt m rt rt n ¢ N 0 m •'F' If you,look at the patterns, both on Mary Way as well as hi V '4 0' (D m H. 0 4 rat P. tq m m - 0P'D ::.rt 't 0 -0,. .rt w PE P. w p .,.¢ dNrt rt o o P. (0 w m m tqg V. OW p m p O m ¢ hi En 0 0 R. :' N ¢ rt r p tin 0 0 hw' 0 w m 0 '0 m rt 4HP.rt0 0 m 2`P 0 H. I,.ti hi0W P.0 rf m w PE P.H En 0 m 0 0 m m N N rt ti N rf 0 m 0 r-r to m P. 0'a o a m '4 0 p. C HI PE rt m 0 p. 'C o Pr E o ro rt V rt r w g o rwr m hi rt ti rt ri 0- 0H 0 a rr rt 0 (0 H m ° H w0 'Pt H rod m m 0 W •'q m a hi PEti rt to (3 1....a IH-' 4 ( J roc m a r c a H H 0 re') ID ID m Pt rt 0 P. w r H o to 0 rt H rtt m 0 w 0HE Et ID WI V rt 0 w -11 ¢ Q N n 0. K. r rt m rt - m m '.4 S w 0 0 rt n rt SIP)G q w N m b' a o. 0 o 0 P. w 0 w cn N rt p rt• 04 0 1 a hn 0oo vrtrt o m 0 F°-' W P.m rwt 0 ch 0 a 0 4 W m rt m 0 LIE/ a co 0• PE 0 P. n rn P. 10 '0 w a m P. P. 0 P.rt 0 0 rt CO N N N N U• 01 N N H COH H H H H 0 l0 J 01 N 10 N 1-' O l0 CO J O1 N Ja UI N H 0 0) HO it CD H rn0 N 0 U1 h CD rt H am P. N where it is on May 21st. Is it halfway into that yard? I G 1 (D( hi 0 0 0 • 1 a H I-'• Z rt ID as rt a H to m w w P. rt 0 N • 0 a E in N a o P(D P. c G0 k 0 Q. a 0 CD rt N N (D n G in 0 u. 0 (D 0 rt N 0 0 H a 0 H a 0 rt G 0 rt N 0 0 (D HI rt m ID a uaaq sat asauq lot of work on the side of the architect n H co H O M z co 0 0 N O rt rt looks like you're preparing. � 0 n o rt 10 K m 11 it w E• ct 0 a 1.1 'C P.N (D H N rt U.H. 0. H ID w m HI H. 0 O HY N 1-h G CD 0 Pi it 5 rt 0 ID qi 0 0 FAO•. 0 a H rt us hh Pi 04 • 0 P. 0 0 rt Cox N N 0 7 w G Hi rt ID n x w O r00 N N. r Ii 0 ID O D H. 0 O I rt 10 p 0 could have been resolved and it's not really our position 0 0 ro o O 0 i 0 0 w N 0•m rt rt ID 11 H a I-, n ID N rt rt• H• CAN (0 H• 7 10 R (D it w (D rt rF ID rl1s ID 0 Di 0 ID 0 a ID certain pattern. I do believe that the Applicant has tried u eqq sMoTTog 4T 'ura5t E mono; seop qt :ss just not be a good situation for anyone involved. a hh rt 0 0 rt 1 w Ia1 aCn rt 0 0 rt CD O a 0 4 N H rar a 0 rt m ch Ort CY a �1 w rt a rt H• H• Fn G rt 0 ID • G H a fn m 12 pi O Q• rt 0 0 0 a s (D hi 0 ID in m N rt rr rt H• 0• ID 0 FG-' 0 0 P. 0 rt packet all of the draining that the engineers provided and w G ID 0 r1 (Y ct rt ID '0 11 ID 0 10 ID (D rt 0 10 (D ID 0 a a 0 0 11 a In rt N N N N N N H H H 'H H H H ,E..' - H Ut 3a W N H 0 0J 01 (P Ja W N H 0 0 0) J 01 01 .0 (0 N H 0 Co G rHt O) ro 1�7.' z H rn0 H � 0 0 v, rrP H 0in CD a N 0 r O 0 Fa'' ID o rt H 0 w a E 0 w 0 H 0' n G w r-r (D I-' (D H. SP. d 0 �' 0 it w H 0) 0 0 0 P. In 0 w 0 0 0 N m 0 0 0 la (D w 0 ¢ rt a 0 E it 0 rt (D i '• 0' H 0 0 0 0 E rt rt 0 (D rt 0' O. 0 0 H N La ri0 " JP "• 4 nhi Ili 0 4 0• I< pi fD rt N H. co • N 0 0 CA G 0 N hhii P. a N • il rt H N 0 `J• 0 ras m trees and the density of the foliage, which is why I don't out to the site; I did see the height of those Cypress Di hi 0 H H H. 10 rat rt 0 0 N 0 ti 0 0 Cn ID In Co H (GD 0 0 11 G 1 00t N 111 0' 0 a Ca In p 'C ti hi a rt ¢, cct q N rt CA' (D Pi rat w 0 0 I-' a w ((D, 0 N o P. 0 as N• ((D0 S rt w � 0' 0 0' (0 0 0 0 a hi N 0 P H $ ((DD E H N cn H it appears that they have. the Applicant has complied with everything technically, and inclination actually is to take a look at whether or not AN .noA $uatj O m 0,P1' a' rt 0 F• P• •ID rt 0 rtP. (DG w rt J a. w n0 pn w a ,o-n 3 rt N cn rt H ryzi a ID 0 CD Hz k 0 w w I H �i O E N HO I0-r 10 n w 0 1 11 t m w n H 0 P. Q m rt (D w 0 • GFI 0) N In (p N H 1-3 I"'' a 11 rt H M H 0 0 O x Co 0 ` 0 5 5 H.rt H n 0 0 0 0 ro a (D- 0 C (D $ ID 0 In 0' H ID trr K o k a O a a 0 rt don't know that. So that would be my lingering N N N N N F+ �-' F' f' �'' r F'• In A W N O 0 Co J m N N O lD Co J an In o V 0 ID 0 o a on o rt a 0' H 0 H w rt rt ID r (D H (D 0 (D 0 M a G of I-- (D In 4 H 0 G 4 0 G 0 w r• w rt tY O N 0 rt N w 0 0 rt H H 1-4 IN (D r P. G `0' N 0 rt rt w r (D (o P. P. 0 r (D rt 1-4 w FGt IGi 0 rt rn 0 o• ° a ti P. (D (D P. 0 r 'C 0 ID N F-A 0 o G P. F-ti o a. rt P. 4 N 0 a w rt 0 0 0 r 0 0 P. p H P. 1-•• 0 'C w 0 r• 4 o a qN m 0 rt a a 0 0 0 m o' P. r x 0 w a 0 0 rt Ul P. 0 rt (D lD r 4 (n. rr 0 0. rt• a a N• a 0; a tY r H d H 0' 0 (D N rt 0 0 tr w 0. m r (D rt p c°n. G '2 a N 0 p n rt 0 rt ID 0 ID m N• ~ a a rr m m 0 ID tr `13 m 30 i% 0 rt m rt w a ti In m 0 w w 0.F. • z ° rt ID ° 0 31 0 0 rt 0 0 rn (D I--1. ro 1-n '.1 0 G .H S7' a r1' 0 r m w r) 0 0 r 0 m t7 w a H w CA 0 Ft 0 H P. GrtG H 4 4 r• 0 cn bl. (] N ,n� 0 0 0. () H 0 w� rt N (aD (an H 0 4P. ❑ 0 0 N• w m 3 p a o w 0" H r• G 0g rt w rt 'C w w r w • CD r rt 'a t3 • to '0 N P. H H O N N 0 0 '4 P. 00 0 rt W (GD rt FF.. rt 0. 0 Ul 0 0 rt ro CO 4 0. 0 0 o z H H 0 'c '0G G 0 0 rt 0 0 �t cn m • N a x rt n ° S G' rr ( R. N " rt H r 0 P. '4 r• G o p' a w rt � En rt 0 rt ° m EGn 0. 0 xrt n c co rt m m ID ID rt k Nrt qpco cr V co H N 0, Z. 'a- ° 0 �`CD H N. F'. (D a " 0 H H rt N ID 0 rtrt()rt N. 0 a 31 co rt 0 H 4 k 4 a (D rt G 3D • In Inpoi rr�t}r P. 4 0 O ° N• 0 0 0 H• 0 0 rt 0o 0 m rt 0 00 fa,°rt rt H. tY 0 w m (D a r project is categorically exempt pursuant to Section 15303 H rt w 0 H P. w o rt H m to 03 rtCD N rt ro m a (Ht m 4 P. N 0 ID o w rt IH N O a b 03 a '4 H o '4 4 0 N a ¢ o 0 a 0 o rt 0 0 co N rt P. (D rr' H ID -uot,iod 4iodau ggegg 3 0 • 0 rt Io G 10 a m '4 3- rrt (D CD CD a a m rn 0 PO a. 'o w rHt N 0 (o r N(o rt rt o m w H 0 P. 0 rt m rt 16161 Short Road, with the findings and conditions that are rt 0 ro H 4 co H 0 P- a G H m 4 a m r- rt D H ro 0 ro a 0 0 CD al 0 0 0 In H N . w 0 N o rt =N3SNsr u3NOISSIwOO P. 1 N N N N N N F+ F• F+ 1-4 (0 '"' F• F., In J_i W N F' O VS, CO J 01. N .N W N F' 0 to O7 J T N W N' 4 w rt 0 0 w ED rt tr a 0 o H. U' r• w r• a 0 0 0 N ro 04 O (D 0. P. I0D co (D 0 0 a 0. H ¢. (D 0 0 PO I 'CI 0 '0 3D ° rt m 0 0 a 0 3-n CO a N o :-: x I r ' H 4 - H .0 tt0q (D ' rt w (D r3 pc 0 1 'Id-' N ' 0 '4 .N w • N N o p r .. H 0 P. Or w (D rt P. rt (D rt -rt -• ... • D -4 - -!0 P. r• 'rt P. H) r rF P. ID 0'0 0 (D 4 'J w rty.� 03 o ID P. '4 m a w G a rt M (D' 0 r• (D P• r 0 rt 00 Uri• a N P. (D w (o P. 0 rt 0 .0 r (D n w a w H- 0 H rt 0 H '-4 rn r H DO P. 0 a. r a,0 m '4 rt 1-fi rt P. 4 P. rt Co rt 0" rt rt 0 0 .`1 (D N 0 In 0 P. 0' HI 0' 30 4 P. 11 En '0w ' H rt 0' CD N (D rt (D fD a w G (D (I)r• "J' ''7' rt 70 w 0 G rt (D ro rt r W H (n tY w x R. y 4 0" H H a p rt r 0' r (D 0 0. p N m co HI O Co w (D o pi, (D rt (D 1 0 H rt ffa H w G r• rt rt m 0 rt H o 0 rt 0 0' rt 0' H U)i w F4 0 P. w rt 0 4 o m x 4 0 o x m w 0 (D K l� 4 F-A P. 4 d E 0 (D 0 0 (D N 0 C7 r• 0 0 rt (D Fh rt rt (D (n 0 m (D P. a pri (D • • 'Ct 0 H 0" r• (D 0 0 0. r• Co 'A (D 4 y o o m 0 a 0' G a 0' 0. w 00 rn co m m I-) g 33 4 m w H w a Ul w P. 0 w w o En P. r • z 0 H 0 '0 r• m rt 0 4 rt 0 4 1-n H p o r H P. m • r H a H H m rt w rn m rt o m ID 0' co 0 4 r• 0 ro G' 4 (D H r• w m r DP ''] .H (D (] w G 4 w N rt r- 0' rt k1 rt H a, 0(7 4 o w (q t7 O rt N b' p o. W 0 rt .7 rt P. 0 m N 0 u rn rt 0 o a rt o r 0 H. w 0. N a 0 N a H Ib r• rt rt w rt a (D G w r w o o rt w p o G x x 0 u (n r w r w H 1 '� O a (D (D (D (D H • .0' (D G1 r CD N P. 33 0. 0 • (D w r• H O (n w • G] G tD m 0 w 0 r m H H n 30�+ P. rt 0' H 0 0 0 CD P. rt H r rt' N N o Y P. a 0' ID w 0 a w H. w 4 a o rt rt N N H H rtp 0 N 1-1,rt H0 P. d H o 0 0 u• to rn r• H 0 '4 CD 0' a 0 r r• o z CD rt 0'0 G • rn cow a o m rt 0 '0 co r P. 0 H 0 0 o $ r (D P. (D 4 w (D 0 w P. 0 a 0 3- ro rt ti 1-' Q H 0 IN P. w r 0 a Ul 0 (D Po N o H w N 0 ID 4 r• rF O r t4 'C r ro G (D UN rt O 0 H H H. rt pw F�qq�, �j' Pin l� (n• .'�' 0 n 'U N (rt rt 0 0' 'O.r' N 4-' �} CD 0 N. '.'y7 f' r• N• rt N rt N 03 0 rt rt N F7 P. rt P. io 'C P. P. 0' W 3 0' rt H '4 0 P. 0 (D H r+ to 0' rt t r W 0 0. w 0 a rt r r rt P. rt,0 rt P. (D N w r 0 0 H G' (n rt G r r 0' M rt x N (o 0 r ro (D a 0 '4 '.r w w o fo r• • to DIN .. rt ro H a (n '4 co (n ro P. rt rt• 4 G 01 m E 4 o a P. • .0" rt CD CD H H o a rr 0 w m rt 0 o P. 0 P. 0' rt u. (D O N 0 a. '4 O 1-,- co .'1 0 Co a 0. o I-1 H. rt 4 0 'wa- rn rr w H Co H (D rt 0 0 p, 0 W N 7 / / 0 [ ) r o m m 0 rt & 0 0 111-1 0' ( ) ) / t 0 0 \ w [ 0) 6\ 0 0 H 0) \ 0 0 0 e 0 t \ 0 0 • \ / 0 \ ( / 2 3 H. 3 M 0 } 7 R R H. H § tcl / \ e / f R ° 0 A 7 0\ & M 0® 7/'" 0 0 0ƒ \ § \ ; % . ' ID • \ 0 0 r] °¥ 0 D/ i m r;! ; \ r t 0.0 f• IN 0Co R&«[ 0> E m\ 0 \ \ 0. \ { 0 0 \ 0 rt 0 0 iv \ \ [ k 0 0 0 \ rt \ \ r r \ Iv o 0 \ / a § 0 ƒ % / o ° ( \ [ ( « ( ° } HI % 1-1$ \ 0 0 [ H. } ; \ ID 0 rt • LC 0 ° ® ` 0 0 •uoTgolu auk. puooas ATuTu sao pTnoM I 4E144 TIE :TI3NNOu,0 UENOISSINN00 ID p ./ E 0 P.J \ cD 5 0 § 2 0 I \ & ° 0 0 0 0 / E 0 s ° [ 0 '0 y 0 o ( 0rt & { 0 ) 0 m H / \ } 0 • ® & » / ® 0rf. \ ) 0 rt & } k \ 0 0 rr } 1 , # 0. /0 \ / \ \ 1 ` \ \ m H. ( [ \ 6. ) ( ® 0' rt 0 :NESNHP USN0ISSINO0 COMMISSIONER O'DONNELL: I will second it. I want This Page Intentionally Left Blank RESOLUTION 2011- RESOLUTION DENYING AN APPEAL OF A PLANNING COMMISSION DECISION APPROVING AN ARCHITECTURE AND SITE APPLICATIONON TO DEMOLISH AN EXISTING SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE AND CONSTRUCT A NEW SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE ON PROPERTY ZONED R-1:20. APN: 523-09-029 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION: S-11-001 PROPERTY LOCATION: 16161 SHORT ROAD PROPERTY OWNER: JOHN AND ELVIE SCOTT APPLICANT: CHRIS SPALDING APPELLANT: ROBERT AND LOIS MALLISON, DEBRA FETTERS, AND DAVID CLARKE WHEREAS: A. This matter came before the Town Council for public hearing on October 17, 2011, and was regularly noticed in conformance with State and Town law. B. The appellant seeks an appeal of a Planning Commission decision approving an Architecture and Site application to demolish an existing single family residence and to construct a new single family residence on property zoned R-1:20. C. The Planning Commission considered the request on June 22, 2011, and continued the matter with direction that the applicant modify the plans to minimize the visual impact to the neighbors. The Commission considered the revised plans on August 24, 2011. The Planning Commission voted 5-1 to approve the Architecture and Site application with the conclusion that all reasonable measures had been used to address the impact to the neighbors without further impacting additional neighbors or creating drainage issues. D. Council received testimony and documentary evidence from the applicant and all interested persons who wished to testify or submit documents. Council considered all testimony and materials submitted, including the record of the Planning Commission proceedings and the packet of ATTACHMENT 1 0 material contained in the Council agenda for October 17, 2011, along with any and all subsequent reports and materials prepared concerning this application. Council finds as follows: 1. The Planning Commission did not err in its decision. RESOLVED: 1. The appeal of a Planning Commission decision for Architecture and Site application S-11-001 is denied. 2. The decision constitutes a final administrative decision pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 1094.6 as adopted by section 1.10.085 of the Town Code of the Town of Los Gatos. Any application for judicial relief from this decision must be sought within the time limits and pursuant to the procedures established by Code of Civil Procedure section 1094.6, or such shorter time as required by State and Federal Law. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Town Council of the Town of Los Gatos, California on the 17th day of October 2011, by the following vote: COUNCIL MEMBERS: AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: SIGNED: MAYOR OF THE TOWN OF LOS GATOS LOS GATOS, CALIFORNIA ATTEST: CLERK OF THE TOWN OF LOS GATOS LOS GATOS, CALIFORNIA RESOLUTION 2011- RESOLUTION GRANTING AN APPEAL OF A PLANNING COMMISSION DECISION APPROVING AN ARCHITECTURE AND SITE APPLICATIONON TO DEMOLISH AN EXISTING SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE AND CONSTRUCT A NEW SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE ON PROPERTY ZONED R-1:20. APN: 523-09-029 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION: S-11-001 PROPERTY LOCATION: 16161 SHORT ROAD PROPERTY OWNER: JOHN AND ELVIE SCOTT APPLICANT: CHRIS SPALDING APPELLANT: ROBERT AND LOIS MALLISON, DEBRA FETTERS, AND DAVID CLARKE WHEREAS: A. This matter came before the Town Council for public hearing on October 17, 2011, and was regularly noticed in conformance with State and Town law. B. The appellant seeks an appeal of a Planning Commission decision approving an Architecture and Site application to demolish an existing single family residence and to construct a new single family residence on property zoned R-1:20. C. The Planning Commission considered the request on June 22, 2011, and continued the , matter with direction that the applicant modify the plans to minimize the visual impact to the neighbors. The Commission considered the revised plans on August 24, 2011. The Planning Commission voted 5-1 to approve the Architecture and Site application with the conclusion that all reasonable measures had been used to address the impact to the neighbors without further impacting additional neighbors or creating drainage issues. D. Council received testimony and documentary evidence from the applicant and all interested persons who wished to testify or submit documents. Council considered all testimony and materials submitted, including the record of the Planning Commission proceedings and the packet of ATTACHMENT 11 material contained in the Council agenda for October 17, 2011, along with any and all subsequent reports and materials prepared concerning this application. E. Council finds as follows: 1. Architecture and Site application S-11-001 shall be remanded to the Planning Commission for further redesign. RESOLVED: 1. The appeal of a Planning Commission decision for Architecture and Site application S-11-001 is granted. The applicant shall address the issues of concern, and the revised application shall be remanded to the Planning Commission for further consideration. 2. The decision constitutes a final administrative decision pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 1094.6 as adopted by section 1.10.085 of the Town Code of the Town of Los Gatos. Any application for judicial relief from this decision must be sought within the time limits and pursuant to the procedures established by Code of Civil Procedure section 1094.6, or such shorter time as required by State and Federal Law. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Town Council of the Town of Los Gatos, California on the 17th day of October 2011, by the following vote. COUNCIL MEMBERS: AYES: NAYS: AB SENT: ABSTAIN: SIGNED: MAYOR OF THE TOWN OF LOS GATOS LOS GATOS, CALIFORNIA ATTEST: CLERK OF THE TOWN OF LOS GATOS LOS GATOS, CALIFORNIA October 7, 2011 Honorable Joe Pirzynski Mayor, Town of Los Gatos 110 East Main Street Los Gatos, CA 95031 RECEIVED OCT 11 2011 MAYOR & TOWN COUNCIL Dear Mayor Pirzynski and Council Members, I have known John and Elvie Scott for over twenty years. They are coming before you on October 17th regarding an appeal to overturn the Planning Commission's decision to allow them to build their home on a parcel they own on Short Rd. in Los Gatos. I was at the last meeting where this decision was made. They and their architect have made many changes to their design and property to please the neighbors. They are wonderful people who will build a quality home and they have spent both time and money to make everyone happy. Unfortunately, some people always want their own way and you cannot please them. I have served on many boards and committees in San Jose, Santa Clara County and Los Gatos. This includes eight years on the Historical Advisory Committee to the Los Gatos Planning Commission. I am writing to all of you to express my support of the Scott's project and hope you will too. Sincerely yours, Patricia Anderson 136 Creffield Heights Los Gatos, CA 95030 ATTAC[muff 1 2 This Page Intentionally Left Blank