Loading...
10 - Staff ReportMEETING DATE: 09/06/11 ITEM NO: 0 COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT DATE: September 1, 2011 TO: MAYOR AND TOWN COUNCIL FROM: GREG LARSON, TOWN MANAGE SUBJECT: ARCHITECTURE AND SITE APPLICATION S-11-051. PROJECT LOCATION: 90-160 ALBRIGHT WAY AND 14600 WINCHESTER BOULEVARD. PROPERTY OWNER: LG BUSINESS PARK, LLC. APPLICANT: JOHN R. SHENK CONSIDER A REQUEST FOR APPROVAL TO DEMOLISH FIVE EXISTING COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS AND CONSTRUCT TWO NEW OFFICE BUILDINGS ON PROPERTY ZONED CM:PD. NO SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS HAVE BEEN IDENTIFIED AS A RESULT OF THIS PROJECT AND A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION WAS PREVIOUSLY ADOPTED. APN'S 424-31-053, 054, 063, 424-32-038, 045, 049, 054, 059, 060, AND 063. RECOMMENDATION: After opening and closing the public hearing, it is recommended the Town Council: 1. Accept the reports of the Planning Commission's findings and recommendations in the form of meeting minutes (Attachment 4) (no motion required); 2. Find that no significant environmental impacts were identified as a result of the project and a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program were prepared for the Planned Development and adopted by the Town Council on August 15, 2011 and there is no new information that would require further review (Public Resource Code Section 21166) (Attachment 1) (motion required); 3. Find that the project is consistent with the PD ordinance (Attachment 1) (motion required); 4. Find that the project is consistent with Section 29.10.09030(e) of the Town Code for the demolition of commercial buildings (Attachment 1) (motion required); 5. Find that the project is consistent with the Common Design guidelines of the Commercial Design Guidelines (Attachment 1) (motion required); PREPARED BY: Wendie R. Rooney, Director of Community Development Reviewed by: QAssistant Town Manager Town Attorney Finance N:\DEV\TC REPORTS\2011 \AlbrightA&S.doc Reformatted: 5/30/02 PAGE 2 MAYOR AND TOWN COUNCIL/S-11-051 SUBJECT: 90-160 Albright Way and 14600 Winchester Boulevard September 1, 2011 6. Find that the project is in substantial compliance with applicable provisions of the Guidelines and Standards for Land Use Near Streams (Attachment 1) (motion required); 7. As required by Section 29.20.150 of the Town Code for Architecture and Site applications (Attachment 1) (motion required); and 8. Approve the Architecture and Site application subject to the proposed conditions of approval (Attachment 2), this approval shall not become effective until September 15, 2011, when Ordinance 2199, approving the Planned Development for this site, becomes effective (motion required). ALTERNATIVES: Instead of the actions above, the Council may: 1. Continue the project to a date certain with specific direction (motion required); 2. Remand the project to the Planning Commission with specific direction (motion required); or 3. Deny the Architecture and Site application (motion required). BACKGROUND On August 1, 2011, the Town Council introduced the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program and the Planned Development (PD) ordinance with the following direction for subsequent Architecture and Site applications: • Architecture and Site applications shall be in substantial conformance with the Official Development Plan including architectural drawings and renderings submitted to Council as part of the PD and Development Agreement review and approval; • The first phase shall consist of one four-story building and one five -story building; • Siting of the first phase buildings is to be as indicated in submittals, maximizing open space, setbacks and retention of existing perimeter and internal trees; • High quality architecture and materials will be used for all office buildings, equivalent to submitted drawings and the existing Netflix campus; • Later phase office buildings will be equivalent four- and five -story buildings to create a campus environment; • All Architecture and Site applications for the project shall be reviewed by the Planning Commission, which will formulate a recommendation to the Town Council for final action. All subsequent phases shall also follow this approval process; and • The Phase I Architecture and Site application is to be heard by the P1am ing Commission on August 24 and acted upon by Council on September 6, assuming the applicant submits all remaining required Architecture and Site materials by August 2. On August 15, 2011, the Town Council adopted the Planned Development ordinance, Development Agreement, and the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program. There is no new information that would require further review (Public Resource Code Section 21166). PAGE 3 MAYOR AND TOWN COUNCIL/S-11-051 SUBJECT: 90-160 Albright Way and 14600 Winchester Boulevard September 1, 2011 DISCUSSION: At its August 24, 2011, meeting, the Planning Commission reviewed the proposed Architecture and Site application. After discussing the project and receiving public testimony, the Commission recommended approval of the Architecture and Site application with the following recommendations: 1. Complete plans should be provided to the Council that address the Consulting Architect and Arborist recommendations and include final details for the new intersection; 2. Balloons should be installed and additional photosimulations from Highway 85, Highway 17, and Lark Avenue should be provided; 3. Modify the proposed plantings to ensure that no species on the Santa Clara Valley Water District list of prohibited plants along waterways will be planted; 4. Ensure that the proposed native wildflower areas only contain native wildflowers; 5. Consider incorporating wildflower area to the east edge of the property; 6. Use native drought tolerant species; and 7. Carefully consider size and placement of replacement perimeter trees. This motion was approved with a vote of 3-2 (Erekson absent, Jensen abstained). Verbatim minutes for this matter are available in Attachment 4. Based on the action of the Planning Commission, the applicant has submitted a revised set of plans (Attachment 7) and a letter (Attachment 5) that address the Planning Commission's direction. The Consulting Architect has reviewed the revised plans and the recommendations are included in Attachment 6 and are required to be incorporated as a condition of approval. The applicant will modify the plans to incorporate these recommendations prior to the issuance of a building permit. The Consulting Arborist reviewed the plans that were considered by the Planning Commission and the recommendations are included in Exhibit 6 of Attachment 3 and are incorporated as a condition of approval. The revised plans do not require any modifications to the recommendations previously provided by the Consulting Arborist. The applicant has modified the plans to incorporate these recommendations and retain as many perimeter and internal trees as possible pursuant to the Planning Commission's recommendation, Council direction, PD Performance Standards, and conditions of approval for the Architecture and Site application. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: A Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program were prepared for the Planned Development and adopted by the Town Council on August 15, 2011. There is no new information that would require further review (Public Resource Code Section 21166) PAGE 4 MAYOR AND TOWN COUNCIL/S-11-051 SUBJECT: 90-160 Albright Way and 14600 Winchester Boulevard September 1, 2011 CONCLUSION: Staff has found that the proposed project is in substantial compliance with the Planning Commission direction, PD ordinance, and Town Council direction. Consequently, staff recommends approval of the application. FISCAL IMPACT: None. Attachments: 1. Required Findings and Considerations (2 pages) 2. Recommended Conditions of Approval (28 pages) 3. Report to the Planning Commission for the meeting of August 24, 2011, without Exhibit 7 (51 pages) 4. Verbatim minutes from the August 24, 2011 Planning Commission hearing (89 pages) 5. Letter from the applicant, received August 31, 2011 (11 pages) 6. Consulting Architect Peer Review, received August 31, 2011 (3 pages) 7. Development Plans, received August 31, 2011 (34 pages) Distribution: cc: John Shenk, 700 Emerson Street, Palo Alto, CA 94301 David A. Kingery, Principal, The Carlyle Group, 4 Orinda Way, Ste.170D, Orinda, CA 94563 WRR:JP:ah N:\DEV\TC REPORTS \2011\AlbrightA&S.doc REQUIRED FINDINGS & CONSIDERATIONS FOR: 90-160 Albright Way and 14600 Winchester Boulevard Architecture and Site Application S-11-051 Requesting approval to demolish five existing commercial buildings and construct two new office buildings on property zoned CM:PD. No significant environmental impacts have been identified as a result of this .project and a Mitigated Negative Declaration was previously adopted. APN's 424-31-053, 054, 063, 424-32-038, 045, 049, 054, 059, 060, 063. PROPERTY OWNER: LG Business Park, LLC APPLICANT: John R. Shenk FINDINGS Required finding for CEQA: ■ No significant environmental impacts were identified as a result of the project and a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program were prepared for the Planned Development and adopted by the Town Council on August 15, 2011. There is no new information that would require further review (Public Resource Code Section 21166) Required finding for consistency with the Planned Development Ordinance: • The project is consistent with the Planned Development Ordinance. Required findings for demolition of the existing commercial structures: • As required by Section 29.10.09030(e) of the Town Code for the demolition of commercial buildings: 1. The Town's housing stock will not be affected as no residential units will be demolished; and 2. The existing structures do not have any historic or architectural significance; and 3. The property owner does not desire to maintain the structures as they exist; and 4. The economic utility of the structures was considered. Required finding for consistency with the Commercial Design Guidelines: ■ The project is consistent with the Common Design guidelines of the Commercial Design Guidelines based on the Town Council's action to approve the Planned Development Ordinance on August 15, 2011, which included architectural plans. Required finding for consistency with the Guidelines and Standards for Land Use Near Streams: • The project is in substantial compliance with applicable provisions of the Guidelines and ATTACHMENT 1 Standards for Land Use Near Streams as the project will be a minimum of 130 feet from the top of bank of Los Gatos Creek and will not increase runoff to Los Gatos Creek. CONSIDERATIONS Required considerations in review of Architecture & Site applications: As required by Section 29.20.150 of the Town Code, the considerations in review of an architecture and site application were all made in reviewing this project. N:\D EV\FMD MGS\201 I \ALBRIGHTA& S.DOCX CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR: 90-160 Albright Way and 14600 Winchester Boulevard Architecture and Site Application S-11-051 Requesting approval to demolish five existing commercial buildings and construct two new office buildings on property zoned CM:PD. No significant environmental impacts have been identified as a result of this project and a Mitigated Negative Declaration was previously adopted. APN's 424-31-053, 054, 063, 424-32-038., 045, 049, 054, 059, 060, 063. PROPERTY OWNER: LG Business Park, LLC APPLICANT: John R. Shenk TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR: Planning Division 1. APPROVAL: This application shall be completed in accordance with all of the conditions of approval listed below and in substantial compliance with the plans approved and noted as received by the Town on August 31, 2011. Any changes or modifications to the approved plans shall be approved by the Community Development Director, the Development Review Committee, the Planning Commission, or Town Council, depending on the scope of the changes. 2. EXPIRATION: The Architecture and Site Application approval will expire two years from the approval date pursuant to Section 29.20.320 of the Town Code, unless the approval has been vested and except as otherwise provided in any applicable development agreement. 3. TOWN INDEMNITY: Applicants are notified that Town Code Section 1.10.115 requires that any applicant who receives a permit or entitlement from the Town shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the Town and its officials in any action brought by a third party to overturn, set aside, or void the permit or entitlement. This requirement is a condition of approval of all such permits and entitlements whether or not expressly set forth in the approval and except as otherwise provided in any, applicable development agreement. 4. WATER EFFICIENCY: This project is subject to the Town's Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance, Chapter 26, Article IV of the Town Code, or the State Model Water Efficiency Ordinance, whichever is more `restrictive. A fee as established by Town Council resolution shall be paid when the landscape, irrigation plans and water calculations are submitted for review prior to the issuance of building permit. 5. COMPLIANCE MEMORANDUM: A memorandum, in compliance with standard Town practice, shall be prepared and submitted with the building permit and/or final subdivision map detailing how the Conditions of Approval will be addressed. 6. ARCHITECT PEER REVIEW: The recommendations in the report from the Consulting Architect dated August 31, 2011, shall be implemented prior to issuance of a building permit. 7. ARBORIST PEER REVIEW: The applicant shall implement the recommendations provided by the Consulting Arborist, Arbor Resources, in the report dated August 18, 2011. 8. LANDSCAPE PLAN: The final Landscape plan shall be reviewed by the Consulting 1 ATTAC}INENT 2 Arborist prior to the issuance of building permit. All Tree Protection measures recommended by the Consulting Arborist shall be followed as specified in the MMRP. 9. TREE REMOVAL PERMIT: A Tree Removal Permit shall be obtained for trees approved for removal prior to the issuance of any permits. 10. TREE FENCING: Protective tree fencing shall be placed at the drip line of existing trees and shall remain through all .phases of construction. Fencing shall be six foot high cyclone (chain link) attached to two-inch diameter steel posts drive 18 inches into the ground and spaced no further than 10 feet apart. Include a tree protection fencing plan with the construction plans. 11. RECYCLING: Prior to the issuance of a demolition permit, the developer shall provide the Community Development Director with written notice of the company that will be recycling the building materials. All wood, metal, glass, and aluminum materials generated from the demolished structure shall be deposited to a company that will recycle the materials. Receipts from the company(s) accepting these materials, noting type and weight of material, shall be submitted to the Town prior to the Town's demolition inspection. 12. NETWORK ACCESS: Network access shall be provided in the outdoor common areas,:. to allow people to work outside. 13. RECREATION MITIGATION MEASURE REC-1: Provision of On -Site or Nearby Recreational Facilities. The project applicant shall either provide access to on -site or nearby recreational facilities for project employees under Scenario 1 and residents .under Scenarios 3 and 4. 14. PROJECT PHASING: The project phasing shall be subject to the provisions of any applicable Development Agreement. If the applicant/developer elects to build the project in phases, then any undeveloped site(s) for future phase(s) shall include provisions for landscaping and other attractive low maintenance improvements, and security and maintenance of any undeveloped land to be developed under future phases. Significant changes to the Phasing Plan that are not in conflict with the Development Agreement may be approved through an A&S application. 15. DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES: The developer is required by law to pay development impact fees to the Los Gatos Union School District (LGUSD) .and the Los Gatos Saratoga Union High School District (LGSUHSD) at the time of the building permit issuance. 16. LANDSCAPE SCREENING: All buildings and parking structures shall be significantly buffered from Winchester Blvd. and properties to the west by the existing, predominately redwood tree screen. All healthy redwoods and other significant trees in the Winchester Blvd. frontage screen shall be retained except for those that would be removed with the construction of the new Albright Way entry just south of proposed Building D. The proposed parking structure would also be screened by the existing vegetation along the northern property line and additional landscaping shall be incorporated as needed to maximize the buffering of the structure from the freeway and properties north. 17. AESTHETICS MITIGATION MEASURE AES-1: Limit Visibility. In order to be consistent with the scale and heights of adjoining commercial and residential development in the project vicinity, support the objectives and policies of the General Plan's VLR Element, and maintain the small-town character of the community, the proposed project configuration shall implement the following measures: • 2 a. Future office and residential structures shall be limited to a height that ensures a substantial portion of building bulk will be screened by existing and future landscape trees to reduce the effects of building height on views to hillside ridgelines and support the community's objective of maintaining its small-town character; and b. Future office and residential structures shall be situated and designed to minimize visual effects on the travelling public, adjacent residents, and nearby commercial uses. The selected project scenario shall include a design that incorporates a combination of buildings with various rather than uniform heights; building design features such as articulation of facades, appropriate fenestration treatment, and similar architectural elements; and a landscaping plan that includes tree species with appropriate height potential to maximize screening of the proposed buildings' upper floors. 18. AESTHETICS MITIGATION MEASURE AES-2: Tree Screens. Existing landscape trees along the northern boundary should be retained to the maximum extent possible to more quickly provide screening from SR 85 and the Los Gatos Creek Trail. 19. AESTHETICS MITIGATION MEASURE AES-3: Landscape Plantings. Proposed landscape plantings shall be initiated during the preliminary phases of the any approved development scenario in order to maintain and enhance the screening of the project site facilities from residents in the Charter Oaks neighborhood and recreationists using the Los Gatos Creek Trail. In the event that the applicant is responsible for the planting of more replacement trees than can be accommodated on the project site, the project applicant and Town will consider opportunities for the planting of native riparian plant species, including trees, within the Los Gatos Creek riparian zone. These efforts will need to be coordinated with the Santa Clara Valley Water District, which has jurisdiction over the creek and adjoining riparian areas. 20. AIR QUALITY MITIGATION MEASURE AQ-1: Basic Construction Measures. To limit the project's construction -related dust and criteria pollutant emissions, the following BAAQMD-recommended Basic Construction Mitigation Measures shall be included in the project's grading plan, building plans, and contract specifications: a. All exposed surfaces (e.g., parking areas, staging areas, soil piles, graded areas, and unpaved access roads) shall be watered two times per day. b. All haul trucks transporting soil, sand, or other loose material off -site shall be covered. c. All visible mud or dirt track -out onto adjacent public roads shall be removed using wet power vacuum street sweepers at least once per day. The use of dry power sweeping is prohibited. d. All vehicle speeds on unpaved roads shall be limited to 15 mph. e. All roadways, driveways, and sidewalks to be paved shall be completed as soon as possible. f. Idling times shall be minimized either by shutting equipment off when not in use or reducing the maximum idling time to five minutes (as required by the California airborne toxics control measure Title 13, Section 2485 of California Code of Regulations [CCR]). Clear signage shall be provided for construction workers at all access points. g. All construction equipment shall be maintained and properly tuned in accordance with manufacturer's specifications. All equipment shall be checked by a certified 3 mechanic and determined to be running in proper condition prior to operation. h. Post a publicly visible sign with the telephone number and person to contact at the Town regarding dust complaints. This person shall respond and take corrective action within 48 hours. The BAAQMD's phone number shall also be visible to ensure compliance with applicable regulations. 21. AIR QUALITY MITIGATION MEASURE AQ-2: Additional Construction Measures. The following BAAQMD Additional Construction Mitigation Measures shall be included in contract specifications for construction: a. Use low volatile organic compounds (VOC) (i.e., reactive organic gases [ROG]) coatings beyond the BAAQMD requirements (i.e., Regulation 8, Rule 3: Architectural Coatings). b. VOC content of architectural coatings shall not exceed 150 grams VOC per liter of coating. 22. AIR QUALITY MITIGATION MEASURE AQ-3: Additional NOx Reduction Construction Measures. The following limitations shall be included in contract specifications for construction and adhered to during soil hauling activities (during mass and fine grading) for each construction phase in order to ensure NOx emissions would be reduced to less -than -significant levels (phasing parameters are defined in the URBEMIS2007 Assumptions included in Appendix A of Attachment 2 of the Initial Study): • Phase 1: Trucks hauling soil during Phase 1 shall not travel more than 23 miles roundtrip. Daily vehicle miles traveled (VMT) during mass grading shall not exceed 1,416; daily VMT during fine grading shall not exceed 425. • Phase 2: Trucks hauling soil during Phase 2 shall not travel more than 26 miles roundtrip. Daily VMT during mass grading shall not exceed 1,629; daily VMT during fine grading shall not exceed 671. • Phase 3: Trucks hauling soil during Phase 3 shall not travel more than 36 miles roundtrip. Daily VMT during mass grading shall not exceed 2,318; daily VMT during fine grading shall not exceed 625. The contractor shall log VMTs daily and submit to the Town monthly. These limitations shall be stipulated in construction bids, plans, and specifications. 23. AIR QUALITY MITIGATION MEASURE AQ-5: Operational Risk Reduction Measures. A minimum 261-foot setback from the freeway shall be required for proposed residential uses and is considered by the BAAQMD to be sufficient to mitigate any potentially significant impacts on any residential uses to unhealthful levels of TACs or PM2.5. 24. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES MITIGATION MEASURE BIO-1: Protection of Nesting Birds during Construction. The following measures shall be implemented prior to any on site construction activities: a. Tree and shrub removal, pruning, and structure demolition should be conducted outside of the breeding season between September 1 and January 31 to avoid impacts to nesting birds. b. If tree and shrub removal, pruning, and structure demolition must occur during the 4 breeding season (February 1 to August 31), preconstruction surveys shall be conducted within the project footprint and a 300-foot buffer, by a qualified biologist no more than two weeks prior to equipment or material staging, pruning/grubbing or surface -disturbing activities. If no active nests are found, no further measures are necessary. c. If active nests i.e. nests with eggs or young birds present, of special -status or migratory birds are found, non -disturbance buffers shall be established at a distance sufficient to minimize disturbance based on the nest location, topography, cover, the nesting pair's tolerance to disturbance and the type/duration of potential disturbance. No work shall occur within the non -disturbance buffers until the young have fledged, as determined by a qualified biologist. Buffer size should be determined in cooperation with the CDFG and the USFWS. If buffers are established and it is determined that project activities are resulting in nest disturbance, work should cease immediately and the CDFG and the USFWS should be contacted for further guidance. d. If active raptor nests are found within 300 feet of construction activities, a qualified biologist shall be on site to monitor the nests for signs of breeding/rearing disruption. If it is determined that any construction activity is resulting in nest disturbance, work shall cease immediately and the CDFG and the USFWS shall be contacted to develop protective measures. 25. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES MITIGATION MEASURE BIO-2: Protection of Riparian Habitat during Construction. Project implementation would require the operation of heavy equipment and machinery for an extended period of time, increasing the level of human activity, noise, lighting, and drifting dust, potentially disrupting wildlife breeding and normal activities in the adjacent Los Gatos Creek riparian habitat. Such effects may reach significant levels without the incorporation of following measures: a. Project construction activities shall be restricted to daylight hours; nighttime work shall not be permitted. b. Use of elevated floodlights shall not be permitted; any exterior lighting shall be directed inward and shall not cause the illumination of the adjacent riparian habitat. c. Vehicle/equipment operations in the vicinity of the riparian corridor shall be minimized to the extent practicable. d. Dust control must be practiced during demolition and grading. 26. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES MITIGATION MEASURE BIO-3: Protection of Riparian Habitat during Project Operation. Implementation of any of the proposed scenarios could result in increased lighting of the riparian corridor at Los Gatos Creek. The mixed -use scenarios could also result in increased interaction between wildlife and domestic pets. Such effects may reach significant levels without the incorporation of following measures: a. The lighting of the selected scenario shall ensure that exterior lighting is directed inward and shall not cause the illumination of the adjacent riparian habitat. b. Restrictions shall be in placed to prevent the placement of pet food containers out-of- doors in areas accessible to wildlife. c. Free -roaming domestic pets (e.g. cats, off -leash dogs) shall not be permitted. 5 d. All exterior trash receptacles shall be designed and maintained to exclude wildlife, 27. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES MITIGATION MEASURE BIO-4: Tree Protection and Replacement. In order to provide appropriate mitigation for the loss of Ordinance - protected trees, the following measures would be required: a. The project proponent shall secure a Tree Removal Permit from the Town of Los Gatos prior to removing or grading within the dripline of any protected tree. b. For the worst -case condition of tree impacts and the Town's tree replacement formula, the maximum number and sizes of replacement trees that could be required are indicated as follows, but could be less depending on the final development design: Number of Trees Size 1282 24" box sized trees, and 4 36" box sized trees, and 4 48" box sized trees. or 54 36" box sized trees, and 236 48" box sized trees. Actual tree replacement would be based upon the final permitted number of trees removed. c. If a tree cannot be reasonably planted on the subject property, the value of the removed tree(s) shall be paid to the Town Forestry Fund to: • Add or replace trees on public property I the vicinity of the subject property, or • Replacement value of a tree shall be determined using the most recent edition of the Guide for Plant Appraisal, as prepared by the Council of Tree and Landscape Appraisers. d. Although the adjacent Los Gatos Creek corridor is not Town property, belonging to the Santa Clara Valley Water District, the Town may also consider accepting riparian habitat restoration and enhancement activities as compensation for the loss of some protected trees on the subject property. As described above, the riparian habitat is degraded by the presence of invasive non-native trees, which could be removed and replaced with native riparian trees. From the perspective of CEQA, enhancement and restoration of the adjacent riparian habitat would satisfactorily mitigate tree impacts resulting from project implementation. e. The project sponsor shall avoid planting ornamental species reported by the California Invasive Plant Council to have the potential to be invasive. Species on this list that can spread by wind—borne seed shall be prohibited from use in landscaping. The proposed list of landscaping species for the project shall be reviewed and approved by the Town. f. In addition to conformance to the Tree Protection Ordinance, the Town arborist's (Deborah Ellis, February 18, 2011) report also outlines protective measures before and during construction. Additional tree protection guidelines are presented in the Tree Protection Ordinance Section 29.10.1005. These measures shall be implemented. 6 g. During construction, accidental injury or removal to and protected trees shall be reported immediately to the Town and appropriate measures taken, as identified by the Town, to mitigate the non -permitted damage and to prevent further accidental impacts. h. The Town shall implement recommendations made by the Town's consulting arborist, Deborah Ellis, in her February 18, 2011 report. These measures encompass design guideline recommendations encompassing the establishment of a Tree Protection Zone to preclude the disturbance of trees to be retained on the project site, erosion control measures, drainage control, and tree replacement requirements. In addition, the arborist's report presents tree protection measures to be implemented before and during project construction. These recommendations are included as Attachment 3 of this study. 28. CULTURAL RESOURCES MITIGATION MEASURE CUL-1: Archaeological Monitor, A qualified archaeologist shall be retained to monitor the site clearing and grading operations in those areas where buildings will be removed and/or new construction will occur. The archaeologist shall be present on -site to observe site clearing at a representative sample of building removal areas until he/she is satisfied that there is not longer a potential for finding buried resources. In the event that any potentially significant archaeological resources are discovered, the project archaeologist shall stop work inside a zone designated by him/her where additional archaeological resources could be found. A plan for the evaluation of the resource shall be submitted to the Community Development Director for approval. Evaluation normally takes the form of limited hand excavation and analysis of materials and information removed to determine if the resource is eligible for inclusion on the California Register of Historic Resources (CRHR). 29. CULTURAL RESOURCES MITIGATION MEASURE CUL-2: Identification of Eligible Resources. If an eligible resource is identified, a plan for mitigation of impacts to the resource shall be submitted to the Los Gatos Community Development Department for approval before any additional construction related earthmoving can occur inside the zone designated as archaeologically sensitive. Mitigation could include additional hand excavation to record and remove for analysis significant archaeological materials, combined with additional archaeological monitoring of soils inside the archaeologically sensitive zone. 30. CULTURAL RESOURCES MITIGATION MEASURE CUL-3: Discovery of Human Remains, Required monitoring will also serve to identify and hopefully reduce damage to human burials and associated grave goods. In the event that human remains are discovered, it shall be the responsibility of the project archaeologist to contact the County Coroner's Office and the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC). The NAHC is responsible for naming a Most Likely Descendant (MLD) who shall represent tribal interests in regards to human remains and associated grave goods. The MLD shall make recommendations to the Community Development Director regarding the method for exposure and removal of human burials and associated grave goods, and shall advise the Community Development Director regarding the place and method of reburial of these materials. 7 31. GEOLOGIC MITIGATION MEASURE GEO-1: Detailed Geotechnical Investigations. The project sponsor shall ensure that a design -level geotechnical investigation is conducted for each planned site improvement. The recommendations of the geotechnical investigation shall be incorporated in the final construction plans for the proposed project. These recommendations shall address liquefaction, lateral spreading, ground rupture due to liquefaction, and differential compaction. 32. GEOLOGIC MITIGATION MEASURE GEO-2: Undocumented Fill. The project sponsor shall require the removal of undocumented fill materials within proposed building excavations. Reuse of the fill materials shall only be allowed if they meet the requirements for engineered fill. Otherwise, imported engineered fill shall be required for building excavations. Undocumented fill materials that do not meet the requirements for engineered fill shall be reused for landscaping or in non-structural fill areas, or shall be disposed of off -site. 33. GREENHOUSE GASES MITIGATION MEASURE GHG-1: A combination of the following list of sustainability and design features shall be incorporated into uses ultimately developed on the project site to achieve the overall scaled reduction in GHG emissions necessary to meet the BAAQMD's significance threshold of 4.6 :MT of GHG per service population per year). For example, based on development project scenarios reviewed in this report, scaled reductions would be required are as follows: 44.34 percent for Scenarios 1 and 2, 18.5 percent for Scenario 3, and 46 percent for Scenario 4. Prior to issuance of building permits, the project applicant shall demonstrate required scaled reductions are achieved through incorporation of a combination of sustainable project design features. Each measure and associated GHG reduction shall be identified and included on all project plans and specifications. One or more of the following sustainability and design features, or other measures that may become available in the future, shall be included to achieve the required scaled reductions in GHG emissions: • Provide secure on -site bike parking (ratio shall be at least one space per 20 vehicle spaces). • Provide information on transportation alternatives accessible to employees within each proposed buildi • Provide preferential on -site carpool/vanpool parking • Increase energy efficiency beyond Title 24 by 20 pe • Install smart meters and programmable thermostats. • Plant shade trees within 40 feet of the south side or of the buildings. • Install roofs with highly reflective materials (albedo (i.e., bus schedules and maps) ng. rcent. within 60 feet of the west sides of at least 30) to reduce cooling load. • Meet 2010 Green Building Code Standards. • Seal heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) ducts to enhance efficiency and reduce energy loss. • Include solar photovoltaic or other technology to generate electricity on -site to reduce consumption from the electrical grid. • Implement employee telecommuting program. 8 • Provide showers/changing facilities on -site for employee use. • Implement an on -site carpool matching program for employees. • Provide on -site amenities (i.e., eating and other establishments). • Increase the project design by 100 percent (i.e., presence of transit -oriented development design guidelines, complete street standards). • Work with the Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD) to implement acceptable off -site mitigation. This involves an agreement with the BAAQMD and payment of fees or the purchase of carbon credits. The BAAQMD would commit to reducing the type and amount of emissions identified in the agreement. 34. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS MITIGATION MEASURE HAZ-1: Hazardous Materials Removal. The following measures shall be required to reduce public health risks related to removal and disposal of hazardous materials to a less -than - significant level: a. The project sponsor shall retain a qualified professional to update the environmental database review performed as part of the Phase 1 ESA no more than three months prior to the start of any construction activities that would involve disturbance of greater than 50 cubic yards of soil. The qualified professional shall prepare a report summarizing the results of the environmental database review that assesses the potential for any identified chemical release sites to affect soil quality at the proposed project site and identifies appropriate soil analysis to evaluate the potential for soil contamination at the proposed project site, if needed. b. The project sponsor shall retain a qualified professional to conduct appropriate sampling to assess the presence and extent of chemicals in the soil as needed for all construction activities under the proposed project that require disturbance of greater than 50 cubic yards of soil. To evaluate the potential for the presence of pesticides and metals, sample analysis shall include dioxins and furans, chlorinated herbicides, chlorinated pesticides, and California Title 22 metals at a minimum. If contamination from a nearby site is indicated by the environmental database review conducted in accordance with Mitigation Measure HAZ-la, then additional analysis shall be conducted in accordance with the recommendations of the qualified professional. The project sponsor shall also be required to notify the regulatory agencies if the concentration of any chemical exceeded its respective screening level. c. For excavation activities where chemical concentrations exceed environmental screening levels, the project sponsor shall require the construction contractor to prepare and to implement a site safety plan, based on the results of sampling conducted as specified in Mitigation Measure HAZ-lb, identifying the chemicals present, potential health and safety hazards, monitoring to be performed during site activities, soils -handling methods required to minimize the potential for exposure to harmful levels of the chemicals identified in the soil, appropriate personnel protective equipment, and emergency response procedures. d. If chemical concentrations exceed environmental screening levels, the project sponsor shall require the construction contractor(s) to prepare a material disposal plan, based on the results of sampling conducted as specified in Mitigation Measure HAZ-1 b, for excess soil produced during construction activities. The plan shall specify the disposal 9 method for soil, approved disposal site, and written documentation that the disposal site will accept the waste. If appropriate, materials may be disposed of on -site, under foundations or in other locations in accordance with applicable hazardous waste classifications and disposal regulations. The contractor shall be required to submit the plan to the project sponsor for acceptance prior to implementation. During construction, excess soil from construction activities shall be stockpiled and sampled to determine the appropriate disposal requirements in accordance with applicable hazardous waste classification and disposal regulations. e. The project sponsor shall require the construction contractor(s) to have a contingency plan for sampling and analysis of potential hazardous materials and for coordination with the appropriate regulatory agencies, in the event that previously unidentified hazardous materials are encountered during construction. If any hazardous materials are identified, the contractor(s) shall be required to modify their health and safety plan to include the new data, conduct sampling to assess the chemicals present, and identify appropriate disposal methods. Evidence of potential contamination includes soil discoloration, suspicious odors, the presence of USTs, or the presence of buried building materials. As discussed in Mitigation Measure HAZ-lb, the project sponsor would remove and notify the regulatory agencies of a discovered release. The assigned lead agency would oversee all aspects of the site investigation and remedial action; and determine the adequacy of the site investigation and remediation activities at the site. 35. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS MITIGATION MEASURE HAZ-2: Hazardous-Building--Materials-.Removal.-Prior--to.- demolitionofa--building, _the_ project sponsor shall incorporate into contract specifications the requirement that the contractor(s) have a hazardous building materials survey completed by a Registered Environmental Assessor or a registered engineer. This survey shall be completed prior to any demolition activities associated with the project. If any friable asbestos -containing materials or lead -containing materials are identified, adequate abatement practices, such as containment and/or removal, shall be implemented in accordance with applicable laws prior to demolition. Any PCB -containing equipment, fluorescent light tubes containing mercury vapors, and fluorescent light ballasts containing DEHP shall also be removed and legally disposed of. 36. NOISE AND VIBRATION MITIGATION MEASURE NOI-l: Detailed Acoustical Analysis for Residential Uses. During the Architecture and Site review process, noise attenuation measures, as specified by an acoustical engineer, shall be incorporated into the project design to ensure that noise levels in usable outdoor areas meet the Town's 65- dBA (DNL) land use compatibility guideline for multi -family residential uses and interior noise levels meet Town's and State (Title 24) interior standard of 45 dBA (DNL). Noise attenuation measures that could be incorporated into the design to achieve these limits include: • Provision of acoustically -effective barriers or deck railings to meet the 65-dBA (DNL) exterior limit. • Provision of closed windows and mechanical ventilation to achieve the 45-dBA (DNL) interior standard. 10 37. NOISE AND VIBRATION MITIGATION MEASURE NOI-2: Construction -Related Vibration Limits. To prevent cosmetic damage to existing adjacent structures, the project contractor shall restrict equipment operations within 25 feet of adjacent structures, whereby surface vibration will be limited to no more than 0.2 in/sec PPV, measured at the closest residential structures. 38. NOISE AND VIBRATION MITIGATION MEASURE NOI-3: Construction -Related Noise Abatement: The project contractor shall demonstrate that the project complies with the following: a. Construction contracts specify that all construction equipment, fixed or mobile, shall be equipped with properly operating and maintained mufflers and other state required noise attenuation devices, and not exceed the ordinance noise limit of 85 dBA at 25 feet. b. Property occupants located adjacent to the project boundary shall be sent a notice, at least 15 days prior to commencement of construction of each phase, regarding the construction schedule of the proposed project. A sign, legible at a distance of 50 feet shall also be posted at the project construction site. All notices and signs shall be reviewed and approved by the Town of Los Gatos Public Works and Community Development Department prior to mailing or posting and shall indicate the dates and duration of construction activities, as well as provide a contact name and a telephone number where residents can inquire about the construction process and register complaints. c The Contractor shall provide, to the satisfaction of the Town of Los Gatos Public Works and Community Development Departments, a qualified "Noise Disturbance Coordinator." The Disturbance Coordinator shall be responsible for responding to any local complaints about construction noise. When a complaint is received, the Disturbance Coordinator shall notify the Town within 24 hours of the complaint and determine the cause of the noise complaint (e.g., starting too early, bad muffler, etc.) and shall implement reasonable measures to resolve the complaint, as deemed acceptable by the Public Works and Community Development Departments. All notices that are sent to residential units immediately surrounding the construction site and all signs posted at the construction site shall include the contact name and the telephone number for the Disturbance Coordinator. d. Construction haul routes shall be designed to avoid noise -sensitive uses, (e.g., residences, convalescent homes, etc.). e. During construction, stationary construction equipment shall be placed such that emitted noise is directed away from sensitive noise receivers. f. Pursuant to the Town of Los Gatos Municipal Code Section 16.20.035, construction activities shall occur between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m. on weekdays, and 9:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m. on weekends and holidays. Additionally, pursuant to Municipal Code Section 16.20.035(2) the Contractor shall demonstrate, to the satisfaction of the Town of Los Gatos Community Development (Building) Department, that construction noise shall not exceed 85 dBA outside of the property line. 39. TRANSPORTATION & TRAFFIC MITIGATION MEASURE TRA-1: Winchester 11 Boulevard and Albright Way (Unsignalized Intersection #4). The necessary improvements to mitigate project and cumulative impacts at this intersection consist of the signalization of the intersection with protected left -turn phasing on Winchester Boulevard. Intersection level of service would improve to LOS B during both peak hours with the improvements. However, based upon vehicular queuing analysis, it is recommended that the project entrance at Winchester Boulevard and Albright Way be restricted to right -turn in and out only and a new signalized project entrance be provided along Winchester Boulevard approximately 200 feet south of Albright Way. The new signalized entrance will be aligned with the entrance to the Courtside Club forming a new four -legged signalized intersection with signal interconnect to the signals at Winchester Boulevard and Wimbledon Drive and Winchester Boulevard and State Route 85 (S). The close spacing of only 400 feet between the new signal and the signal at Wimbledon Drive will require that the two signals be interconnected and signal timing to be synchronized. Alternate configurations may be possible to accommodate specific project phasing. Any interim alternate configurations must provide a level of service that conforms to the Town's Traffic Impact Policy. 40. TRANSPORTATION & TRAFFIC MITIGATION MEASURE TRA-2: University Avenue and Lark Avenue (Unsignalized Intersection #7). The necessary improvements to mitigate project and cumulative impacts at this intersection consist of the signalization of the intersection with signal interconnect to and coordination with the signal at Winchester Boulevard and Lark Avenue. Intersection level of service would improve to LOS B and C during the AM and PM peak hours, respectively, with the improvements. It should be noted that this intersection is projected to operate at unacceptable levels under Town of Los Gatos 2020 General Plan Conditions. The Town of Los Gatos Draft 2020 General Plan identifies the above improvement as a roadway improvement necessary to accommodate the future development allowed under the 2020 General Plan. However, due to the lack of dedicated funding sources for the improvements identified in the General Plan, this improvement cannot be assumed to be completed under Project Conditions. Therefore, the project will be required to fund and construct the improvement, unless other development is identified that will contribute a 'fair share' amount toward the implementation of the improvement. 41. TRANSPORTATION & TRAFFIC MITIGATION MEASURE TRA-3: Winchester Boulevard and Lark Avenue (Signalized Intersection #6). The developer shall interconnect and synchronize the traffic signals at the Lark/University, Winchester/Lark, Winchester/Wimbledon, and Winchester/New project entry intersections to mitigate pre - and post -project queues at the Lark Avenue intersection by preventing them from extending into the Wimbledon Drive intersection.1 The interconnection and synchronization improvements shall be completed prior to issuance of the first certificate of occupancy for the development phase that triggers project entry signalization. 42. TRANSPORTATION & TRAFFIC MITIGATION MEASURE TRA-4: Pedestrian and 1 These improvements are based on an operational study of the interconnection and synchronization of traffic signals at Lark/University, Winchester/Lark, Winchester/Wimbledon, and Winchester/New project entry that was prepared Hexagon Transportation Consultants, Inc. in June 2011. The study concluded that interconnection and synchronization of these signals would fully mitigate project queuing impacts without the need to lengthen turn pockets. 12 Bicycle Access. In order to avoid potential pedestrian safety hazards, the project applicant shall install appropriate fencing along the east side of Winchester Boulevard to prevent pedestrians from trying to cross the railroad tracks. Further, all required improvements along Winchester Boulevard (including those specified in Mitigation Measure TRA-1 through TRA-3) shall be designed to accommodate the proposed Class II bikeway designated by the 2020 General Plan for Winchester Boulevard between Lark avenue and the northern town limit. 43. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC MITIGATION MEASURE TRA-5: Parking Survey. During the Architecture and Site review process, a parking survey shall be completed at other comparable facilities in the region in order to determine adequacy of proposed parking for senior residents as well as senior facility staff under Scenario 4. Building Division 44. PERMITS REQUIRED: A building permit shall be required for the construction of each new structure. Separate building permits are required for site retaining walls, swimming pools, etc; separate electrical, mechanical, and plumbing permits shall be required as necessary. 45. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: The Conditions of Approval shall be stated in full on the cover sheet of the construction plan submitted for building permit. 46. PLANS. The construction plans for this project shall be prepared under direct supervision of a licensed architect or engineer (Business and Professionals Code Section 5538). 47. DEMOLITION REQUIREMENTS: Obtain Building Department Demolition Applications and Bay Area Air Quality Management Applications from the Building Department Service Counter. Once the demolition forms have been completed, all signatures obtained, and written verification from PG&E that all utilities have been disconnected, return the completed form to the Building Department Service Counter with the J# Certificate, PG&E verification, and three (3) sets of site plans to include all existing structures, existing utility service lines such as water, sewer, and PG&E. No demolition work shall be done without first obtaining a permit from the Town. 48. SOILS REPORT: Two copies of a soils report, prepared to the satisfaction of the Building Official, containing foundation and retaining wall design recommendations, shall be submitted with the building permit application. This report shall be prepared by a licensed civil engineer specializing in soils mechanics. 49. FOUNDATION INSPECTIONS: A pad certificate prepared by a licensed civil engineer or land surveyor shall be submitted to the project building inspector upon foundation inspection. This certificate shall certify compliance with the recommendations as specified in the soils report and the building pad elevation and on -site retaining wall locations and elevations are prepared according to approved plans. Horizontal and vertical controls shall be set and certified by a licensed surveyor or registered civil engineer for the following items: a. Pad elevation b. Finish floor elevation c. Foundation corner locations 50. TITLE 24 ENERGY COMPLIANCE: All required California Title 24 Energy Compliance Forms must be blue -lined, i.e. directly printed, onto a plan sheet(s). 13 51. SPECIAL INSPECTIONS. When special inspections are required by CBC Section 1704, the architect or engineer of record shall prepare an inspection program that shall be submitted to the Building Official for approval prior to issuance of the Building Permit. The Town Special Inspection form must be completely filled out and signed by all requested parties prior to issuance of the Building Permit. Special Inspection Forms are available from the Building Division Service Counter or online at www.losgatosca. gov/building. 52. NPDES-C.3 DATA FORMS: A copies of the NPDES C.3 Data Forms (updated based on the final construction drawings) must be blue -lined in full on the plans. In the event that this data differs significantly from any Planning approvals, the Town may require recertification of the project's storm water treatment facilities prior to release of the Building Permit. 53. BACKWATER VALVES: The scope of this project may require the installation of sanitary sewer backwater valves per Town Ordinance 6.50.025. Please provide information on the plans if backwater valves are required and the locations of the installations. The Town of Los Gatos. Ordinance and West Valley Sanitation District (WVSD) requires backwater valves on drainage piping serving fixtures that have flood level rims less than 12-inches above the elevation of the next upstream manhole. 54. NON -POINT SOURCE POLLUTION STANDARDS: The Town standard Santa Clara Valley Non -point Source Pollution Control Program specification sheet shall be part of plan submittal. The specification sheet is available at the Building Division service counter. 55. GREEN BUILDING STANDARDS: This project must, at a minimum, be in compliance with the Nonresidential Mandatory Measures of the 2010 California Green Building Standards Code. 56. SITE ACCESSIBILITY: At least one accessible route within the boundary of the site shall be provided from public transportation stops, accessible parking and accessible passenger loading zones and public streets or sidewalks to the accessible building entrance they serve. The accessible route shall, to the maximum extent feasible, coincide with the route for the general public. At least one accessible route shall connect accessible buildings, facilities, elements and spaces that are on the same site. If access is provided for pedestrians from a pedestrian tunnel or elevated walkway, entrances to the building from each tunnel or walkway must be accessible. 57. ACCESSIBLE PARKING: The parking lot, as well as the parking structure, where parking is provided for the public as clients, guests or employees, shall provide handicap accessible parking. Accessible parking spaces serving a particular building shall be located on the shortest accessible route of travel from adjacent parking to an accessible entrance. In buildings with multiple accessible entrances with adjacent parking, accessible parking spaces shall be dispersed and located closest to the accessible entrances. The number of accessible parking spaces required is established by CBC Table 11B-6. 58. PLUMBING FACILITIES: Plumbing facilities and fixtures shall be provided for the type of building occupancy and in the minimum numbers established in California Plumbing Code Table 4-1. Adequate area to accommodate these facilities must be determined. 59. MEANS OF EGRESS: Required exits shall discharge directly to the exterior of the 14 building or through a rated passageway providing direct access to the exterior of the building. The exit discharge shall not reenter a building. 60. ADDITIONAL AGENCY APPROVALS REQUIRED: The project requires the following agency approvals before issuance of a building permit: a. West Valley Sanitation District: 378-2407 b. Santa Clara County Fire Department: 378-4010 c. Bay Area Air Quality Management District: (415) 771-6000 d. The Town will forward the paperwork to the appropriate school district(s) for processing. A copy of the paid receipt is required prior to permit issuance. TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE PARKS AND PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR: Engineering Division 61. GENERAL All public improvements shall be made according to the latest adopted Town Standard Drawings and the Town Standard Specifications, subject to the provisions of any applicable Development Agreement. All work shall conform to the applicable Town ordinances. The adjacent public right-of-way shall be kept clear of all job related dirt and debris at the end of the day. Dirt and debris shall not be washed into storm drainage facilities. The storing of goods and materials on the sidewalk and/or the street will not be allowed unless a special permit is issued. The developer's representative in charge shall be at the job site during all working hours. Failure to maintain the public right-of-way according to this condition may result in the Town performing the required maintenance at the developer's expense. 62. DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT: The applicant shall enter an agreement to construct public improvements in accordance with Town Code 24.40.020, subject to the provisions of any applicable Development Agreement. 63. GRADING PERMIT: A grading permit is required for site grading and drainage. The grading permit application (with grading plans) shall be made to the Engineering Division of the Parks & Public Works Department located at 41 Miles Avenue. The grading plans shall include final grading, drainage, retaining wall location, driveway, utilities and interim erosion control. Grading plans shall list earthwork quantities and a table of existing and proposed impervious areas. Unless specifically allowed by the Parks and Public Works Director, the grading permit will be issued concurrently with the building permit. The grading permit is for work outside the building footprint(s). A separate building permit, issued by the Building Department at 110 E. Main Street is needed for grading within the building footprint. 64. GRADING PERMIT PHASING: Phased grading permits may be allowed if approved by the Town Attorney and the Parks and Public Works Director. Phasing may relate to development phases or to multiple grading permits within a development phase, such as early release of a grading permit prior to release of the building permit. Bonding of early grading improvements may be required. 65. TENTATIVE MAP: A tentative map and A&S approval are required for each development phase, prior to submittal for a final or parcel map for that phase. Phased final maps shall be permitted. 66. SUBDIVISION MAP: A final or parcel map shall be recorded. Two copies of the final / parcel map shall be submitted to the Engineering Division of the Parks & Public Works Department for review and approval. Submittal shall include closure calculations, title 15 reports and appropriate fee. The map shall be recorded before any building permits are issued. A&S and Tentative Map planning applications shall be approved for each development phase before a parcel or final map for that phase is recorded. 67. SUBDIVISION MAP 2: A parcel map shall be recorded to adjust lot lines from seven existing parcels to seven future parcels, abandon existing public right of way, and grant necessary public easements. The timing of map recordation in relation to issuance of building permits shall be determined by the Directors of Community Development and Parks and Public Works. The map shall be recorded prior to issuance of the first certificate of occupancy at the latest. 68. CC&R's: CC&R's shall be submitted together with the subdivision map for review and approval by the Town Attorney, Director of Community Development, and Director of Parks and Public Works prior to recordation of the subdivision map. 69. PRIVATE EASEMENT ABANDONMENT: Documents for private easement abandonment shall be submitted, processed, and recorded with the subdivision map. 70. 14600 WINCHESTER BLVD: An ingress egress easement across 14600 Winchester Boulevard shall be recorded with the subdivision map. 71. ENCROACHMENT PERMIT: All work in the public right-of-way will require a Construction Encroachment Permit. All work over $5,000 will require construction security. 72. DEDICATIONS: The following shall be dedicated on each subdivision map. The dedications shall be recorded before any permits are issued. a. Winchester Boulevard. Right of way as needed to accommodate required frontage and site entry improvements. b. Public Service Easements (PSE), as required. c. Ingress -egress, storm drainage and sanitary sewer easements, as required. d. Emergency Access Easement. Twenty (20) feet wide, extending from the northerly terminus of Charter Oaks, through the project site, to Winchester Blvd. 73. PAD CERTIFICATION: A letter from a licensed land surveyor shall be provided for each building stating that the building foundation was constructed in accordance with the approved plans shall be provided subsequent to foundation construction and prior to construction on the structure. The pad certification shall address both vertical and horizontal foundation placement. 74. DESIGN CHANGES: The Applicant's registered Engineer shall notify the Town Engineer, in writing, at least 72 hours in advance of all differences between the proposed work and the design indicated on the plans. Any proposed changes shall be subject to the approval of the Town before altered work is started. Any approved changes shall be incorporated into the final "as -built" drawings. 75. AS -BUILT PLANS: After completion of the construction of all work, the original plans shall have all changes (change orders and field changes) clearly marked. The "as -built" plans shall again be signed and "wet -stamped" by the civil engineer who prepared the plans, attesting to the changes. The original "as -built" plans shall be review and approved the Engineering Inspector. A Mylar and AutoCAD disk of the approved "as -built" plans shall be provided to the Town before the Faithful Performance Security or Occupancy Permit is released. The AutoCAD file shall include only the following information and shall conform to the layer naming convention: a) Building Outline, Layer: BLDG- OUTLINE; b) Driveway, Layer: DRIVEWAY; c) Retaining Wall, Layer: RETAINING 16 WALL; d) Swimming Pool, Layer: SWIMMING -POOL; e) Tennis Court, Layer: TENNIS -COURT; f) Property Line, Layer: PROPERTY -LINE; g) Contours, Layer: NEWCONTOUR. All as -built digital files must be on the same coordinate basis as the Town's survey control network and shall be submitted in AutoCAD version 2000 or higher. 76. FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATIONS: Finished floor elevations for all new structures shall be higher than the 100-year water surface elevations identified on Flood Insurance Rate Maps current at the time of building permit issuance. 77. PLAN CHECK FEES: Mapping and Grading Permit plan check fees shall be deposited with the Town prior to plan review at the Engineering Division of the Parks and Public Works Department. Fee amounts are as specified in the applicable fee schedule, subject to the provisions of any applicable Development Agreement. 78. INSPECTION FEES: The Inspection fees shall be deposited with the Town prior to issuance of any Permit or recordation of the Final Map. Fee amounts are as .specified in the applicable fee schedule, subject to the provisions of any applicable Development Agreement. At the discretion of the Town Engineer, the developer shall fund a Public Works inspector on a time and materials basis as needed for the duration of the mass grading and drainage construction for each development phase, subject to the provisions of any applicable Development Agreement. 79. PUBLIC WORKS INSPECTIONS: The developer or his representative shall notify the Engineering Inspector at least twenty-four (24) hours before starting any work pertaining to on -site drainage facilities, grading or paving, and all work in the Town's right-of-way. Failure to do so will result in rejection of work that went on without inspection. 80. THIRD PARTY INSPECTOR FEES: The applicant shall pay for the inspection of public street lighting and traffic signal related work. Inspections shall be performed by the Town's street lighting and traffic signal contractor. An initial deposit of $5,000 shall be made to the Town prior to issuance of an encroachment or public improvement permit. Inspection will be on a cost recovery basis and additional inspection fees may be required. 81. SOILS ENGINEER CONSTRUCTION OBSERVATION: During construction, all excavations and grading shall be inspected by the applicant's soils engineer prior to placement of concrete and/or backfill so they can verify that the actual conditions are as anticipated in the design -level geotechnical report, and recommend appropriate changes in the recommendations contained in the report, if necessary. The results of the construction observation and testing should be documented in an "as -built" letter/report prepared by the applicants' soils engineer and submitted to the Town before final release of any occupancy permit is granted. 82. WATER DESIGN: Water plans prepared by SJWC must be reviewed and approved prior to issuance of any permit for each development phase, subject to the discretion of the Town Engineer. 83. STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN: A storm water management shall be included with the grading permit application for all Group 1 and Group 2 projects as defined in the amended provisions C.3 of the amended Santa Clara County NPDES Permit. The plan shall delineate source control measures and BMP's together with the sizing calculations. The plan shall be certified by a professional pre -qualified by the Town. In the event that storm water measures proposed on the A&S approval differ significantly from those 17 certified on the Building/Grading Permit, the Town may require a modification of the A&S approval prior to release of the Building Permit. The applicant may elect to have the A&S submittal certified to avoid this possibility. 84. AGREEMENT FOR STORMWATER BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE OBLIGATIONS: The property owner or Owner's Association, as appropriate, shall enter into an agreement with the Town for maintenance of the stormwater filtration devices required to be installed on this project by Town's Stormwater Discharge Permit and all current amendments or modifications. The agreement will specify that certain routine maintenance shall be performed by the property owner or owner's association, as applicable, and will specify device maintenance reporting requirements. The agreement will also specify routine inspection requirements, permits and payment of fees. The agreement shall be recorded prior to release of any occupancy permits. 85. SITE DRAINAGE: Any storm drain inlets (public or private) shall be stenciled/signed with appropriate "NO DUMPING - Flows to Bay" NPDES required language. 86. NPDES: On -site drainage systems for all projects shall conform to the requirements of the Municipal Regional NPDES Permit that is current at the time of A&S approval for each development phase. Each development phase must provide; at a minimum, sufficient improvements to treat all development within that phase. Deferral of treatment to future phases will not be allowed. 87. WEST VALLEY SANITATION DISTRICT: All sewer connection and treatment plant capacity fees shall be paid either immediately prior to the recordation of any subdivision map, or immediately prior to the issuance of a sewer connection permit, which ever event occurs first. Written confirmation of payment of these fees shall be provided prior to recordation of each map or issuance of a building permit. 88. SANITARY SEWER LATERAL: Sanitary sewer laterals are televised by West Valley Sanitation District and approved by the Town of Los Gatos before they are used or reused. Install a sanitary sewer lateral clean -out at the property line. 89. SANITARY SEWER BACKWATER VALVE: Drainage piping serving fixtures which have flood level rims less than twelve (12) inches (304.8 mm) above the elevation of the next upstream manhole and/or flushing inlet cover at the public or private sewer system serving such drainage piping shall be protected from backflow of sewage by installing an approved type backwater valve. Fixtures above such elevation shall not discharge through the backwater valve, unless first approved by the Administrative (Sec. 6.50.025). The Town shall not incur any liability or responsibility for damage resulting from a sewer overflow where the property owner or other person has failed to install a backwater valve, as defined section 103(e) of the Uniform Plumbing Code adopted by section 6.50.010 of the Town Code and maintain such device in a functional operating condition. Evidence of West Valley Sanitation District's decision on whether a backwater device is needed shall be provided prior to issuance of a building permit. 90. TRASH ENCLOSURES: Trash enclosures shall be covered and provided with a drain connected to the sanitary sewer system. 91. GREASE TRAPS: Meet all requirements of the Santa Clara County Health Department and West Valley Sanitation District for the interception, separation or pretreatment of effluent. 92. UTILITIES: All new utilities shall be placed underground. 18 93. ABOVE GROUND UTILITIES: The applicant shall submit a 75-percent progress print to the Town for review of above ground utilities including backflow prevention devices, fire department connections, gas and water meters, off-street valve boxes, hydrants, site lighting, electrical/communication/cable boxes, transformers, and mail boxes. Above ground utilities shall be reviewed and approved by the Community Development Director prior to issuance of any permit for each development phase. 94. UTILITY RELOCATION AND PHASING: Utility and circulation relocation and phasing plans shall be included in the grading permit application package. 95. PHOTOMETRICS: Site lighting photometrics shall be provided with the building permit submittal. The site lighting improvements shall be approved by the Directors of Community Development and Parks and Public Works prior to issuance of a building permit. 96. UTILITY COMPANY REVIEW: Letters from the electric, telephone, cable, and trash companies indicating that the proposed improvements and easements are acceptable shall be provided prior to recordation of each subdivision map. 97. JOINT TRENCH PLANS: Joint trench plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Town prior to recordation of each map. The joint trench plans shall include street and/or site lighting and associated photometrics. A letter shall be provided by PG&E stating that public street light billing will by Rule LS2A, and that private lights shall be metered with billing to the owners association. Pole numbers, assigned by PG&E, shall be clearly delineated on the plans. 98. TRENCHING: Trenching within public streets will be allowed subject to the following requirements: a. The Town standard "T" trench detail shall be used. b. A Town approved colored controlled density backfill shall be used. c. The total asphalt thickness shall be a minimum of 3-inches or shall match the existing thickness, whichever is greater. The final lift shall be 1.5-inches of half inch medium asphalt. The initial lift(s) shall be of three quarter inch medium asphalt. d. The Contractor shall schedule a pre -paving meeting with the Town Engineering Construction Inspector the day the paving is to take place. e. A slurry seal topping may be required by the construction inspector depending his assessment of the quality of the trench paving. If required, the slurry seal shall extend the full width of the street and shall extend 5-feet beyond the longitudinal limits of trenching. Slurry seal materials shall be approved by the Town Engineering Construction Inspector prior to placement. Black sand may be required in the slurry mix. All existing striping and pavement markings shall be replaced upon completion of slurry seal operations. 99. TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE: The developer shall pay the Town Traffic Impact Fee in accordance with the Town Code and Council fee resolution in effect at the time the building permit application is made, subject to the provisions of any applicable Development Agreement. Credit from demolishing existing office use shall be applied toward the new office/R&D space. It shall not be allowed toward the residential use unless there is unused credit after all new office/R&D space A&S applications have been approved. 100. PARKING: Any proposed parking restrictions on public streets must be approved by the LGPD. 19 101. TRAFFIC SIGNAL: A new intersection aligned with the existing Courtside driveway on Winchester Boulevard, and conversion of the existing Albright Way intersection to right - turn in and out shall be provided with the Phase 1 development. Improvements shall be in conformance with Transportation and Traffic Mitigation Measure TRA-1. A full traffic signal, signal interconnection and timing shall be provided prior to issuance of the first certificate of occupancy. No alternate configurations to the TRA-1 improvements will be considered. 102. TRAFFIC SIGNAL TIMING AND SYNCHRONIZATION: The applicant shall provide a proposal from a licensed traffic engineer containing a scope of work and fee for adjusting the timing and synchronizing the traffic signals as required by Transportation and Traffic Mitigation TRA-3. Synchronization shall be performed prior to occupancy of each Phase 1 building, and again once each building has reached a significant level of occupancy. A bond for the re -timing and synchronizing traffic signals up to two times subsequent to the initial work performed prior to occupancy shall be posted with the Town prior to issuance of each certificate of occupancy. 103. BASIS OF TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENT DESIGN: A design level traffic study shall be provided with the Grading Permit application to serve as a basis for design. The study shall address LOS and queuing analysis at -:all project entries and : provide recommendations for minimum queue lengths. 104. TRAFFIC CIRCULATION STUDIES: In connection with the A&S Approval for each development phase, the developer shall prepare design -level circulation plans to address onsite circulation and project entry points from Winchester Boulevard. The plans will identify the configuration of on -site circulation facilities and the configuration of project entry points from Winchester Boulevard, as needed to support each development phase. The plans shall be in accordance with the Traffic Impact Study dated March 17, 2011 previously prepared for the Albright Way Project, and mitigation measures identified therein. The plans shall be funded by the developer and subject to Town Engineer approval. 105. TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENTS: The following traffic improvements shall be provided in addition to those identified in the CEQA review. These improvements shall be substantially complete prior to issuance of the first certificate of occupancy, and . fully complete and accepted by the Town prior to thefinal certificate of occupancy .for the applicable development phase. a. New Project Entry. The applicant shall provide detailed intersection traffic analysis for the proposed intersection configuration to Town Engineer for approval. As a minimum, an additional right turn lane entering the project site, additional bike lanes along Winchester Boulevard, and two left -turn lanes exiting the project site shall be required. All cost including and not limited to traffic analysis, design, construction, inspection, and construction management shall be borne by the applicant. The analysis and construction shall address all four legs of the intersection, including the Courtside leg. b. Winchester Blvd./Albright Way. Construct a landscaped median island with turn restriction signage. c. Frontage Improvements. Paint pole and Install LED light fixture for all existing street lights at the project frontage. 20 106. FRONTAGE IMPROVEMENTS: Applicant shall be required to improve the project's public frontage to current Town Standards, subject to the provisions of any applicable Development Agreement. These improvements may include but not limited to curb, gutter, sidewalk, driveway approaches, curb ramps, street lighting (upgrade and/or repaint) etc. 107. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS: Plans for public improvements shall be prepared by a California registered civil engineer, reviewed and approved by the Town, and guaranteed by contract, Faithful Performance Security and Labor & Materials Security before the issuance of a building permit or the recordation of a subdivision map for each development phase. The improvements must be substantially completed prior to issuance of the first certificate of occupancy, fully complete and accepted by the Town prior to issuance of the final Certificate of Occupancy for each development phase. 108. RESTORATION OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS: The developer shall repair or replace all existing improvements not designated for removal that are damaged or removed because of developer's operations. Improvements such as, but not limited to: curbs, gutters, sidewalks, driveways, signs, pavements, raised pavement markers, thermoplastic pavement markings, etc. shall be repaired and replaced to a condition equal to or better than the original condition. A slurry seal shall be provided across the full road width in areas of trenching, road widening, median modification or construction, and where striping has been ground off. Existing improvement to be repaired or replaced shall be at the direction of the Engineering Construction Inspector, and shall comply with all Title 24 Disabled Access provisions. Developer shall request a walk-through with the Engineering Construction Inspector before the start of construction to verify existing conditions. 109. PUBLIC AND PRIVATE IMPROVEMENT SECURITY: The applicant shall supply suitable securities for all public improvements, and private circulation and drainage infrastructure improvements that are a part of the development in a form acceptable to the Town in the amount of 100% (performance) and 100% (labor and material) prior to issuance of any permit for each development phase. Applicant shall provide two (2) copies of documents verifying the cost of the applicable improvements to the satisfaction of the Engineering Division of the Parks and Public Works Department. 110. RETAINING WALLS: A building permit, issued by the Building Department at 110 E. Main Street, may be required for site retaining walls. Walls are not reviewed or approved by the Engineering Division of Parks and Public Works during the grading permit plan review process. 111. SOILS REPORT: One copy of the soils report shall be submitted with each grading permit application. The soils report shall include specific criteria and standards governing site grading, drainage, pavement design, retaining wall design and erosion control. The reports shall be signed and "wet stamped" by the engineer or geologist, in conformance with Section 6735 of the California Business and Professions Code. 112. SOIL EXPORT: The total soil export volume (sum of all development phases) from the site shall not exceed 90,000 cubic yards. The contractor's project engineer shall send daily trucking reports to the Engineering inspector during the export operation of each development phase. 113. HAULING OF SOIL: Hauling of soil on or off -site shall not occur during the morning or evening peak periods (between 7:00 a.m. and 9:00 a.m. and between 4:00 p.m. and 6:00 21 p.m.). Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the developer shall work with the Town Building and Engineering Department Engineering Inspectors to devise a traffic control plan to ensure safe and efficient traffic flow under periods when soil is hauled on or off the project site. This may include, but is not limited to provisions for the developer/owner to place construction notification signs noting the dates and time of construction and hauling activities, or providing additional traffic control. Coordination with other significant projects in the area may also be required. Cover all trucks hauling soil, sand, and other loose debris or require all trucks to maintain at least two feet of freeboard. 114. SOILS REVIEW: Prior to issuance of each grading permit, the applicant's soils engineer shall review the final grading and drainage plans to ensure that designs for foundations, retaining walls, site grading, and site drainage are in accordance with their recommendations and the peer review comments. The applicant's soils engineer's approval shall then be conveyed to the Town either by letter or by signing the plans. 115. EROSION CONTROL: Interim and final erosion control plans shall be prepared and submitted to the Engineering Division of the Parks & Public Works Department. A Notice of Intent (NOI) and Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) shall be submitted to the San Francisco Bay Regional Water. Quality Controls Board for projects disturbing more than one acre. A maximum of two weeks is allowed between clearing of an area and stabilizing/building on an area if grading is allowed during the rainy season. Interim erosion control measures, to be carried out during construction and before installation of the final landscaping shall be included. Interim erosion control method shall include, but are not limited to: silt fences, fiber rolls (with locations and details), erosion control blankets, Town standard seeding specification, filter berms, check dams, retention basins, etc. Provide erosion control measures as needed to protect downstream water quality during winter months. The grading,drainage, erosion control plans and SWPPP shall be in compliance with applicable measures contained in the amended provisions C.3 and C.14 of the most current Santa Clara County NPDES MRP Permit. 116. SURVEYING CONTROLS: Horizontal and vertical controls shall be set and certified by a licensed surveyor or registered civil engineer qualified to practice land surveying, for the following items: a. Retaining wall= -top, of wall elevations and locations b. Toe and top of cut and fill slopes 117. PRECONSTRUCTION PAVEMENT SURVEY: Prior to issuance of a Grading Permit, the project Applicant shall complete a pavement condition survey documenting the extent of existing pavement defects using a 35-mm or digital video camera. The survey shall extend from the Highway 17 freeway ramps on Lark Avenue along Lark and Winchester to the Campbell City limits. In addition, a pavement deflection analysis conforming to the same Limits as the photographic survey shall be performed to determine pavement strength. The results shall be documented in a report and submitted to the Town for review. 118. POSTCONSTRUCTION PAVEMENT SURVEY: The project Applicant shall complete a post construction pavement condition survey and pavement deflection analysis to determine whether road damage occurred as a result of project construction and whether there were changes in pavement strength. Rehabilitation improvements required to restore the pavement to pre -construction condition and strength shall be determined using State 22 of California procedures for deflection analysis. The results shall be documented in a report and submitted to the Town for review and approval. The Applicant shall be responsible for completing any required road repairs prior to release of a certificate of occupancy. 119. TREE REMOVAL: Copies of all necessary tree removal permits shall be provided prior to issuance of any grading permit. 120. DEMOLITION: Any existing structures that would straddle a future property line shall be demolished prior to recordation of the final or parcel map for the applicable phase. . 121. DUST CONTROL: Blowing dust shall be reduced by timing construction activities so that paving and building construction begin as soon as possible after completion of grading, and by landscaping disturbed soils as soon as possible. Further, water trucks shall be present and in use at the construction site. All portions of the site subject to blowing dust shall be watered as often as deemed necessary by the Town, or a minimum of three times daily, or apply (non -toxic) soil stabilizers on all unpaved access roads, parking areas, and staging areas at construction sites in order to insure proper control of blowing dust for the duration of the project. Watering on public streets shall not occur. Streets will be cleaned by street sweepers or by hand as often as deemed necessary by the Town Engineer, or at least once a day. Watering associated with on -site construction activity shall take place between the hours of 8 a.m. and 5 p.m. and shall include at least one late -afternoon watering to minimize the effects of blowing dust. All public streets soiled or littered due to this construction activity shall be cleaned and swept on a daily basis during the workweek to the satisfaction of the Town. Demolition or earthwork activities shall be halted when wind speeds (instantaneous gusts) exceed 25 MPH. All trucks hauling soil, sand, or other loose debris shall be covered. 122. DUST CONTROL (SITES > 4 ACRES): The following measures should be implemented at construction sites greater than four acres in area: a. Hydroseed or apply (non -toxic) soil stabilizers to inactive construction areas (previously graded areas inactive for ten days or more). b. Enclose, cover, water twice daily or apply (non -toxic) soil binders to exposed stockpiles (dirt, sand, etc.) c. Limit traffic speeds on unpaved roads to 15 mph. d. Install sandbags or other erosion control measures to prevent silt runoff to public roadways. e. Replant vegetation in disturbed areas as quickly as possible. 123. SILT AND MUD IN PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY: It is the responsibility of contractor and property owner to make sure that all dirt tracked into the public right-of-way is cleaned up on a daily basis. Mud, silt, concrete and other construction debris SHALL NOT be washed into the Town's storm drains. 124. SIDEWALK CLOSURE: Any proposed blockage or partial closure of the sidewalk requires an encroachment permit. Special provisions such as limitations on works hours, protective enclosures, or other means to facilitate public access in a safe manner may be required. 125. SIDEWALK REPAIR: The developer shall repair and replace to existing Town standards any sidewalk damaged now or during construction of this project. Sidewalk repair shall match existing color, texture and design, and shall be constructed per Town 23 Standard Details. The limits of sidewalk repair will be determined by the Engineering Construction Inspector during the construction phase of the project. 126. CURB AND GUTTER: The developer shall repair and replace to existing Town standards any curb and gutter damaged now or during construction of this project. New curb and gutter shall be constructed per Town Standard Details. The limits of curb and gutter repair will be determined by the Engineering Construction Inspector during the construction phase of the project. 127. PRIVATE EASEMENTS: Agreements detailing rights, limitations, and responsibilities of involved parties shall accompany each private easement. The easements and associated agreements shall be recorded simultaneously with each subdivision map. 128. PRIVATE STREETS: All new streets shall be private. 129. PRECONSTRUCTION MEETING: Prior to issuance of any permit or the commencement of any site work, the general contractor shall: a. Along with the project applicant, attend a pre -construction meeting with the Town Engineer to discuss the project conditions of approval, working hours, site maintenance and other construction matters; b. Acknowledge in writing that they have read and understand:. the project conditions of approval, and will make certain that all project sub -contractors have read and understand them prior to commencing work and that a copy of the project conditions of approval will be posted on site at all times during construction. 130. CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT PLAN: The Applicant shall submit a construction management plan that shall incorporate at a minimum the Earth Movement Plan, Traffic Control Plan, Project Schedule, site security fencing, employee parking, construction staging area, construction trailer, and proposed outhouse locations. 131. GOOD HOUSEKEEPING: Good housekeeping practices shall be observed at all times during the course of construction. Superintendence of construction shall be diligently performed by a person or persons authorized to do so at all times during working hours. The storing of goods and/or materials on the sidewalk and/or the street will not be allowed unless a special permit is issued by the Engineering Division. The adjacent public right-of-way shall be kept clear of all job related dirt and debris at the end of the day. Dirt and debris shall not be washed into storm drainage facilities. The storing of goods and materials on the sidewalk and/or the street will not be allowed unless a special permit is issued. The developer's representative in charge shall be at the job site during all working hours. Failure to maintain the public right-of-way according to this condition may result in the Town performing the required maintenance at the developer's expense. 132. TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN: The project sponsor will be required to work with the Engineering Division of the Parks and Public Works Department to develop a traffic control plan for incorporation into the construction bid documents (specifications), and this plan will include, but not be limited to, the following measures: a. Construction activities shall be strategically timed and coordinated to minimize traffic disruption for schools, residents, businesses, special events, and other projects in the area. The schools located on the haul route shall be contacted to help with the coordination of the trucking operation to minimize traffic disruption. 24 b. Flag persons shall be placed at locations necessary to control one-way traffic flow. All flag persons shall have the capability of communicating with each other to coordinate the operation. c. Prior to construction, advance notification of all affected residents and emergency services shall be made regarding one-way operation, specifying dates and hours of operation. 133. CONSTRUCTION STREET PARKING: No vehicle having a manufacturer's rated gross vehicle weight exceeding ten thousand (10,000) pounds shall be allowed to park on the portion of a street which abuts property in a residential zone without prior approval from the Town Engineer (§ 15.40.070). 134. COVERED TRUCKS: All trucks transporting materials to and from the site shall be covered. 135. CC&R's: A copy of the CC&R's shall be submitted for review and approval by the Town Attorney and Planning Division prior to map recordation. 136. AIR QUALITY MITIGATION MEASURE AQ-4: Additional DPM Reduction Construction Measures. Prior to the approval of project plans and specifications, the Town Engineer, or his designee, shall confirm that the construction bid packages include a plan demonstrating that the off -road equipment (more than 50 horsepower) to be used in the construction project (i.e., owned, leased, and subcontractor vehicles) will achieve a project wide fleet -average 20 percent NOx reduction and 45 percent diesel particulate matter (DPM) reduction compared to the most recent CARB fleet average. Acceptable options for reducing emissions include the use of late model engines, low -emission diesel products, alternative fuels, engine retrofit technology, after -treatment products, add -on devices such as particulate filters, and/or other options as such become available. These limitations shall be stipulated in construction bids, plans, and specifications, and shall be enforced by the Town Engineer. 137. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS MITIGATION MEASURE USS-1: Preserve or relocate existing eight -inch line sanitary sewer line. During Architecture and Site Review, detailed utility plans shall indicate either preservation or relocation of the existing eight - inch sanitary sewer transmission line to accommodate service for off -site flows north through the site and establish a new sewer easement for this line. In addition, a letter from West Valley Sanitation District stating approval of the project, shall be provided to the Town by the applicant. TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE SANTA CLARA COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT: 138. Review of this development proposal is limited to acceptability of site access and water supply as they pertain to fire department operations, and shall not be construed as a substitute for formal plan review to determine compliance with adopted model codes. Prior to performing any work the applicant shall make application to, and receive from, the Building Department all applicable construction permits. 139. FIRE DEPARTMENT ACCESS MINIMUM CLEAR WIDTH: The minimum clear width of fire department access roads shall be 20 feet. Aerial fire apparatus access roads: Buildings or portions of buildings or facilities exceeding 30 feet (9144 mm) in height above the lowest level of fire department vehicle access shall be provided with approved 25 fire apparatus access roads capable of accommodating fire department aerial apparatus. Overhead utility and power lines shall not be located within the aerial fire apparatus access roadway. Aerial Fire apparatus access roads shall have a minimum unobstructed width of 26 feet (7925) in the immediate vicinity of any building or portion of building more than 30 feet (9144 mm) in height. Proximity to building: At least one of the required access routes meeting this condition shall be located within a minimum of 15 feet (4572) and a maximum of 30 feet (9144mm) from the building, and shall be positioned parallel to one entire side of the building, as approved by the fire code official. CFC Sec. 503 See Pages C-1, C-2.1 and C-2.2 140. ACCESS AND LOADING: Facilities: buildings or portions of buildings hereafter constructed shall be accessible to fire department apparatus by way of an approved fire apparatus access road (including bridges and culverts) with an asphalt, concrete or other approved driving surface capable of supporting the imposed load of fire apparatus weighing at least 75,000 pounds (34050 kg) or as otherwise determined by the fire code official. Minimum clear height: Vertical clearance over required vehicular access roads and driveways shall be 13'6". Grade: Maximum grade shall not exceed 15% (6.75 degrees). Turn Radius (circulating): The mini -mum outside :turning radius is 42 feet for required access roadways. Greater radius up to 60 feet may be required where the Fire Department determines that Ladder Truck access is required. Circulating refers to travel along a roadway without dead ends. Turning Radius (Cul-de-sacs): The minimum outside turning radius is 36 feet. Use of cul-de-sacs is not acceptable where it is determined by the Fire Department that Ladder Truck access is required, unless greater turning radius is provided. CFC Sec. 503 See Pages C-1, C-2.1 and C-2.2 141. EMERGENCY RESPONDER RADIO COVERAGE: Buildings and structures that cannot support the required level of radio coverage shall be equipped with a radiating cable system, a distributed antenna system with Federal Communications Commission (FCC) -certified signal boosters or other system approved by the fire code official in order to achieve the required adequate radio coverage. CFC J103.1.1 142. FIRE SPRINKLERS WHERE REQUIRED: An automatic fire sprinkler system shall be provided throughout all new buildings and structures. Where the provisions of this code require that a building or portion thereof be equipped throughout with an automatic sprinkler system in accordance with this section, the sprinklers shall be installed throughout in accordance with NFPA 13 except as provided in Section 903.3.1.1.1 and local standards. Note: The owner(s), occupant(s) and any contractor(s) or subcontractor(s) are responsible for consulting with the water purveyor of record in order to determine if any modification or upgrade of the existing water service is required. A State of California licensed (C-16) Fire Protection Contractor shall submit plans, calculations, a completed permit application and appropriate fees to this department for review and approval prior to beginning their work. CFC Sections 903.2.1 through 903.2.18 as adopted and amended by LGTC 143. POTABLE WATER: Potable water supplies shall be protected from contamination caused by fire protection water supplies. It is the responsibility of the applicant and any contractors and subcontractors to contact the water purveyor supplying the site of such project, and to comply with the requirements of that purveyor. Such requirements shall be incorporated into the design of any water -based fire protection systems, and/or fire 26 suppression water supply systems or storage containers that may be physically connected in any manner to an appliance capable of causing contamination of the potable water supply of the purveyor of record. Final approval of the system(s) under consideration will not be granted by this office until compliance with the requirements of the water purveyor of record are documented by that purveyor as having been met by the applicant(s). 2007 CFC Sec. 903.3.5 and Health and Safety Code 13114.7 144. HOSE VALVES/STANDPIPES REQUIRED: Buildings shall be equipped with standpipes designed per NFPA Std. #14, as amended in Chapter 47, and be equipped with 2-1/2" inch hose valves, at location designated by the fire department. Hose valves/standpipes shall be installed as per the 2010 CFC Sec. 905, or where emergency access has been deemed minimal, shall be equipped with standpipes designed per NFPA Std. #14, as amended in Chapter 47, and be equipped with 2-1/2" inch hose valves, located within the stair enclosure(s). Note specifically, within parking structure(s) @ stairwells and on podium within courtyard area. 2010 CFC Sec. 905 145. PUBLIC FIRE HYDRANT(S) REQUIRED: Provide public fire hydrant(s) at location(s) to be determined jointly by the Fire Department and San Jose Water Company. Fire hydrants shall be provided along required fire apparatus access roads and adjacent public streets at location(s) to be determined by the Fire Department. Maximum hydrant spacing shall be 500 feet, with a minimum acceptable flow of 1,500 GPM at 20 psi residual pressure. Prior to design, the project civil engineer shall meet with the fire department water supply officer to jointly spot the required fire hydrant locations. 2010 CFC Sec. 507, Apndx. B and C and Tables B106 and C105.1 146, FIRE LANE MARKING REQUIRED: Provide marking for all roadways within the project. Markings shall be per fire department specifications. Installations shall also conform to Local Government Standards and Fire Department Standard Details and Specifications A-6. 2010 CFC Sec. 503.3 147. TIMING OF REQUIRED WATER SUPPLY INSTALLATIONS: Installations of required fire service(s) and fire hydrant(s) shall be tested and accepted by the Fire Department, prior to the start of framing or delivery of bulk combustible materials. Building permit issuance may be withheld until required installations are completed, tested, and accepted. 2010 Sec, 501 148. TIMING OF REQUIRED ROADWAY INSTALLATIONS: Required access roads, up through first lift of asphalt, shall be installed and accepted by the Fire Department prior to the start of combustible construction. During construction, emergency access roads shall be maintained clear and unimpeded. Note that building permit issuance may be withheld until installations are completed. Temporary access roads may be approved on a case by case basis. 2010 Sec. 501 149. PREMISES IDENTIFICATION: Approved numbers or addresses shall be placed on all new and existing buildings in such a position as to be plainly visible and legible from the street or road fronting the property. Numbers shall contrast with their background. CFC Sec. 505 150. NEW COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS: All new commercial buildings shall comply with standard specification SI-7 for construction site fire safety. 151. FIRE HYDRANT LOCATION IDENTIFIER: Prior to project final inspection, the 27 general contractor shall ensure that an approved ("Blue Dot") fire hydrant location identifier has been placed in the roadway, as directed by the fire department. 152. TRAFFIC SIGNAL PREMPTION: As discussed on 8/16/2011, both new and existing traffic signals on Winchester Blvd. and Lark Ave. must be equipped with signal preemption control devices. Contact this office to determine which intersections must be so equipped. 153. CONDITIONS: To prevent plan review and inspection delays, the above noted Developmental Review Conditions shall be addressed as "notes" on all pending and future plan submittals and any referenced diagrams to be reproduced onto the future plan submittal. N:\DEV\CONDITNS\2011 \AlbrightA&S. doc 28 TOWN OF. LOS GATOS PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Meeting Date: August 24, 2011 PREPARED BY: APPLICATION NO: LOCATION: APPLICANT: Joel Paulson, Senior Planner jpaulson@losgatosca.gov ITEM NO: 2 Architecture and Site Applications S-11-051 90-160 Albright Way and 14600 Winchester Boulevard John R. Shenk PROPERTY OWNERS: LG Business Park LLC APPLICATION SUMMARY: RECOMMENDATION: PROJECT DATA: Requesting approval to demolish five existing commercial buildings and construct two new office buildings on property zoned CM:PD. No significant environmental impacts have been identified as a result of this project and a Mitigated Negative Declaration was previously adopted. APN's 424-31-053, 054, 063, 424-32-038, 045, 049, 054, 059, 060, and 063. DEEMED COMPLETE: August 17, 2011 FINAL DATE TO TAKE ACTION: February 17, 2012 Strong approval. General Plan Designation: Zoning Designation: Applicable Plans & Standards: Parcel Size: Surrounding Area: Light Industrial Controlled Manufacturing with a Planned Development Overlay (CM:PD) General Plan 21.6 acres North East Existing Land Use Hwy.._8 5............._._.._....._....._..........._..._ Office / High Density Residential Low Density Residential Medium Density Residential General Plan N/A Neighborhood Commercial Low Residential Medium Residential Zoning 1N/A....__..._. CM:PD Density R-1:8 Density RMH ATTACHMENT 3 t Planning Commission Staff Report - Page 2 90-160 Albright Way and 14600 Winchester Boulevard / S-11-051 August 17, 2011 CEQA: FINDINGS: ___._._._..........Open Space _._.._.._....__..-_......_Open Space ___.__.._....._......._._ CM South County Fire Light Industrial CM West Freeway N/A NA Interchange Courtside Medium Density CM:PD Residential Residential Medium Density RM- Residential 5:12:PD A Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program were prepared for the Planned Development and adopted by the Town Council on August 1, 2011. ■ No significant environmental impacts were identified as a result of the project and a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program were prepared for the Planned Development and adopted by the Town Council on August 1, 2011. • That the project is consistent with the Planned Development Ordinance. • As required by Section 29.20.09030(e) of the Town Code for the demolition of commercial buildings. • That the project is consistent with the Common Design guidelines of the Commercial Design Guidelines. • That the project is in substantial compliance with applicable provisions of the Guidelines and Standards for Land Use Near Streams. CONSIDERATIONS: As required by Section 29.20.150 of the Town Code for Architecture and Site applications. ACTION: Forward a recommendation to Town Council for approval of the Architecture and Site application. EXHIBITS: 1. Location Map 2. Required Findings and Considerations (2 pages) 3. Conditions of Approval (28 pages) 4. Letter of Justification and Letter of Project Description from the applicant (5 pages) 5. Consulting Architect Peer Review, dated August 15, 2011 (6 pages) 6. Consulting Arborist Peer Review, dated August 18 (4 pages) 7. Development Plans, received August 10, 2011 (31 sheets) Planning Commission Staff Report - Page 3 90-160 Albright Way and 14600 Winchester Boulevard / S-11-051 August 17, 2011 BACKGROUND: On August 1, 2011, the Town Council adopted the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program and introduced the Planned Development ordinance with the following direction for subsequent Architecture and Site applications: • Architecture and Site applications shall be in substantial conformance with the Official Development Plan including architectural drawings and renderings submitted to Council as part of the PD and Development Agreement review and approval; • The first phase shall consist of one four-story building and one five -story building; • Siting of the first phase buildings is to be as indicated in submittals, maximizing open space, setbacks and retention of existing perimeter and internal trees; • High quality architecture and materials will be used for all office buildings, equivalent to submitted drawings and the existing Netflix campus; • Later phase office buildings will be equivalent four- and five -story buildings to create a campus environment; • All Architecture and Site applications for the project shall be reviewed by the Planning Commission, which will formulate a recommendation to the Town Council for final action. All subsequent phases shall also follow this approval process; and • The Phase I Architecture and Site application is to be heard by the Planning Commission on August 24 and acted upon by Council on September 6, assuming the applicant submits all remaining required Architecture and Site materials by August 2. On August 15, 2011, the Town Council adopted the Planned Development ordinance and Development Agreement. ANALYSIS: Based on the action of the Town Council, the applicant has submitted an updated and complete set of plans (Exhibit 7) that are similar to the architectural plans presented to the Town Council at its meeting of August 1, 2011, and meet the direction outlined above. The Consulting Architect has reviewed the plans and the recommendations are included in Exhibit 5 and are incorporated as a condition of approval. The applicant will modify the plans to incorporate these recommendations prior to the issuance of a building permit. The Consulting Arborist has reviewed the plans and the recommendations are included in Exhibit 6 and are incorporated as a condition of approval. The applicant will modify the plans to incorporate these recommendations and retain as many perimeter and internal trees as possible pursuant to Council direction and PD Performance Standards, prior to the issuance of a building permit. Planning Commission Staff Report - Page 4 90-160 Albright Way and 14600 Winchester Boulevard / S-11-051 August 17, 2011 CEQA DETERMINATION: A Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program were prepared for the Planned Development and adopted by the Town Council on August 1, 2011. No further environmental analysis is required for the individual lot development. CONCLUSION/RECOMMENDATION: A. Conclusion Staff has found that the proposed project is in compliance with the PD ordinance and Town Council direction regarding Architecture and Site applications. Consequently, staff recommends that the application be forwarded to theTown Council with a recommendation of strong approval as outlined in the following recommendation section. B. Recommendation Staff recommends that the Planning Commission take the following actions to approve the Architecture and Site application: 1. No significant environmental impacts were identified as a result of the project and a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program were prepared for the Planned Development and adopted by the Town Council on August 1, 2011; and 2. Find that the project is consistent with the PD ordinance (Exhibit 2); and 3. Find that the project is consistent with Section 29.10.09030(e) of the Town Code for the demolition of commercial buildings (Exhibit 2); and: 4. Find that the project is consistent with the Common Design guidelines 'of the Commercial Design Guidelines (Exhibit 2); and 5. Find that the project is in substantial compliance with applicable provisions of the Guidelines and Standards for Land Use Near Streams (Exhibit 2); and 6. Find that the project is consistent with the considerations for approval of an Architecture and Site application (Exhibit 2); and 7. Forward a recommendation of approval of the Architecture and Site application subject to the proposed conditions of approval (Exhibit 3). P fepared by: J.el Paulson Senior Planner (..e/„e/n c e; //v0/2-C,c Approved by: Wendie R. Rooney Director of Community Development Planning Commission Staff Report - Page 5 90-160 Albright Way and 14600 Winchester Boulevard / S-11-051 August 17, 2011 WRR:JP:ct cc: John Shenk, 700 Emerson Street, Palo Alto, CA 94301 David A. Kingery, Principal, The Carlyle Group, 4 Orinda Way, Ste,170D, Orinda, CA 94563 N:\DEV\PC REPORTS\2011\AlbrightA&S,doc This Page Intentionally Left Blank 90-160 Albright Way and 14600 Winchester Boulevard Exhibit 1 This Page Intentionally Left Blank REQUIRED FINDINGS & CONSIDERATIONS FOR: 90-160 Albright Way and 14600 Winchester Boulevard Architecture and Site Application S-11-051 Requesting approval to demolish five existing commercial buildings and construct two new office buildings on property zoned CM:PD. No significant environmental impacts have been identified as a result of this project and a Mitigated Negative Declaration was previously adopted. APN's 424-31-053, 054, 063, 424-32-038, 045, 049, 054, 059, 060, 063. PROPERTY OWNER: LG Business Park, LLC APPLICANT: John R. Shenk FINDINGS Required finding for CEQA: ■ No significant environmental impacts were identified as a result of the project and a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program were prepared for the Planned Development and adopted by the Town Council on August 1, 2011. Required finding for consistency with the Planned Development Ordinance: ® The project is consistent with the Planned Development Ordinance. Required findings for demolition of the existing commercial structures: • As required by Section 29.10.09030(e) of the Town Code for the demolition of commercial buildings: 1. The Town's housing stock will not be affected as no residential units will be demolished; and 2. The existing structures do not have any historic or architectural significance; and 3. The property owner does not desire to maintain the structures as they exist; and 4. The economic utility of the structures was considered. Required finding for consistency with the Commercial Design Guidelines: • The project is consistent with the Common Design guidelines of the Commercial Design Guidelines based on the Town Council's action to approve the Planned Development Ordinance on August 15, 2011, which included architectural plans. Required finding for consistency with the Guidelines and Standards for Land Use Near Streams: • The project is in substantial compliance with applicable provisions of the Guidelines and Standards for Land Use Near Streams as the project will be a minimum of 130 feet from the top of bank of Los Gatos Creek and will not increase runoff to Los Gatos Creek. Exhibit 2 CONSIDERATIONS Required considerations in review of Architecture & Site applications: ■ As required by Section 29.20.150 of the Town Code, the considerations in review of an architecture and site application were all made in reviewing this project. N:\DEV\FINDINGS\20t 1\ALBRIGHTA&S.DOCX CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR: 90-160 Albright Way and 14600 Winchester Boulevard Architecture and Site Application S-11-051 Requesting approval to demolish five existing commercial buildings and construct two new office buildings on property zoned CM:PD. No significant environmental impacts have been identified as a result of this project and a Mitigated Negative Declaration was previously adopted. APN's 424-31-053, 054, 063, 424-32-038, 045, 049, 054, 059, 060, 063. PROPERTY OWNER: LG Business Park, LLC APPLICANT: John R. Shenk TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR: Planning Division 1. APPROVAL: This application shall be completed in accordance with all of the conditions of approval listed below and in substantial compliance with the plans approved and noted as received by the Town on August 10, 2011. Any changes or modifications to the approved plans shallbe approved by the Community Development Director, the Development Review Committee, the Planning Commission, or Town Council, depending on the scope of the changes. 2. EXPIRATION: The Architecture and Site Application approval will expire two years from the approval date pursuant to Section 29.20.320 of the Town Code, unless the approval has been vested. 3. TOWN INDEMNITY: Applicants are notified that Town Code Section 1.10.115 requires that any applicant who receives a permit or entitlement from the Town shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the Town and its officials in any action brought by a third party to overturn, set aside, or void the permit or entitlement. This requirement is a conditionof approval of all such permits and entitlements whether or not expressly set forth in the approval. 4. WATER EFFICIENCY: This project is subject to the Town's Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance, Chapter 26, Article IV of the Town Code, or the State Model Water Efficiency Ordinance, whichever is more restrictive. A fee as established by Town Council resolution shall be paid when the landscape, irrigation plans and water calculations are submitted for review prior to the issuance of building permit. 5. COMPLIANCE MEMORANDUM: A memorandum, in compliance with standard Town practice, shall be prepared and submitted with the building permit and/or final subdivision map detailing how the Conditions of Approval will be addressed. 6. ARCHITECT PEER REVIEW: The recommendations in the report from the Consulting Architect dated August 15, 2011, shall be implemented prior to issuance of a building permit. 7. ARBORIST PEER REVIEW: The applicant shall implement the recommendations provided by the Consulting Arborist, Arbor Resources, in the report dated August 17, 2011. 8. LANDSCAPE PLAN: The final Landscape plan shall be reviewed by the Consulting Arborist prior to the issuance of building permit. All Tree Protection measures recommended by the Consulting Arborist shall be followed as specified in the MMRP. 1 Exhibit 3 9. TREE REMOVAL PERMIT: A Tree Removal Permit shall be obtained for trees approved for removal prior to the issuance of any permits. 10. TREE FENCING: Protective tree fencing shall be placed at the drip line of existing trees and shall remain through all phases of construction. Fencing shall be six foot high cyclone (chain link) attached to two-inch diameter steel posts drive 18 inches into the ground and spaced no further than 10 feet apart. Include a tree protection fencing plan with the construction plans. 11. RECYCLING: Prior to the issuance of a demolition permit, the developer shall provide the Community Development Director with written notice of the company that will be recycling the building materials. All wood, metal, glass, and aluminum materials generated from the demolished structure shall be deposited to a company that will recycle the materials. Receipts from the company(s) accepting these materials, noting type and weight of material, shall be submitted to the Town prior to the Town's demolition inspection. 12. NETWORK ACCESS: Network access shall be provided in the outdoor common areas, to allow people to work outside. 13. RECREATION MITIGATION MEASURE REC-1: Provision of. On -Site . or Nearby Recreational Facilities. The project applicant shall either provide access to on -site or nearby recreational facilities for project employees under Scenario 1 and residents under Scenarios 3 and 4. 14, PROJECT PHASING: The project phasing shall be subject to the provisions of any applicable Development Agreement. If the applicant/developer elects to build the project in phases, then any undeveloped site(s) for future phase(s) shall include provisions for landscaping and other attractive low maintenance improvements, and security and maintenance of any undeveloped land to be developed under future phases. Significant changes to the Phasing Plan that are not in conflict with the Development Agreement may be approved through an A&S application. 15. DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES: The developer is required by law to pay development impact fees to the Los Gatos Union School District (LGUSD) and the Los Gatos - Saratoga Union High School District (LGSUHSD) at the time of the building permit issuance. 16. LANDSCAPE SCREENING: All buildings and parking structures shall be significantly buffered from Winchester Blvd. and properties to the west by the existing, predominately redwood tree screen. All healthy redwoods and other significant trees in the Winchester Blvd. frontage screen shall be retained except for those that would be removed with the construction of the new Albright Way entry just south of proposed Building D. The proposed parking structure would also be screened by the existing vegetation along the northern property line and additional landscaping shall be incorporated as needed to maximize the buffering of the structure from the freeway and properties north. 17. AESTHETICS MITIGATION MEASURE AES-1: Limit Visibility. 'In order to be consistent with the scale and heights of adjoining commercial and residential development in the project vicinity, support the objectives and policies of the General Plan's VLR Element, and maintain the small-town character of the community, the proposed project configuration shall implement the following measures: a. Future office and residential structures shall be limited to a height that ensures a substantial portion of building bulk will be screened by existing and future landscape 2 trees to reduce the effects of building height on views to hillside ridgelines and support the community's objective of maintaining its small-town character; and b. Future office and residential structures shall be situated and designed to minimize visual effects on the travelling public, adjacent residents, and nearby commercial uses. The selected project scenario shall include a design that incorporates a combination of buildings with various rather than uniform heights; building design features such as articulation of facades, appropriate fenestration treatment, and similar architectural elements; and a landscaping plan that includes tree species with appropriate height potential to maximize screening of the proposed buildings' upper floors. 18. AESTHETICS MITIGATION MEASURE AES-2: Tree Screens. Existing landscape trees along the northern boundary should be retained to the maximum extent possible to more quickly provide screening from SR 85 and the Los Gatos Creek Trail. 19. AESTHETICS MITIGATION MEASURE AES-3: Landscape Plantings. Proposed landscape plantings shall be initiated during the preliminary phases of the any approved development scenario in order to maintain and enhance the screening of the project site facilities from residents in the Charter Oaks neighborhood and recreationists using the Los Gatos Creek Trail. In the event that the applicant is responsible for the planting of more replacement trees than can be accommodated on the project site, the project applicant and Town will consider opportunities for the planting of native riparian plant species, including trees, within the Los Gatos Creek riparian zone. These efforts will need to be coordinated with the Santa Clara Valley Water District, which has jurisdiction over the creek and adjoining riparian areas. 20. AIR QUALITY MITIGATION MEASURE AQ-1: Basic Construction Measures. To limit the project's construction -related dust and criteria pollutant emissions, the following BAAQMD-recommended Basic Construction Mitigation Measures shall be included in the project's grading plan, building plans, and contract specifications: a. All exposed surfaces (e.g., parking areas, staging areas, soil piles, graded areas, and unpaved access roads) shall be watered two times per day. b. All haul trucks transporting soil, sand, or other loose material off -site shall be covered. c. All visible mud or dirt track -out onto adjacent public roadsshall be removed using wet power vacuum street sweepers at least once per day. The use of dry power sweeping is prohibited. d. All vehicle speeds on unpaved roads shall be limited to 15 mph. e. All roadways, driveways, and sidewalks to be paved shall be completed as soon as possible. f. Idling times shall be minimized either by shutting equipment off when not in use or reducing the maximum idling time to five minutes (as required by the California airborne toxics control measure Title 13, Section 2485 of California Code of Regulations [CCR]). Clear signage shall be provided for construction workers at all access points. g. All construction equipment shall be maintained and properly tuned in accordance with manufacturer's specifications. All equipment shall be checked by a certified mechanic and determined to be running in proper condition prior to operation. 3 h. Post a publicly visible sign with the telephone number and person to contact at the Town regarding dust complaints. This person shall respond and take corrective action within 48 hours. The BAAQMD's phone number shall also be visible to ensure compliance with applicable regulations. 21. AIR QUALITY MITIGATION MEASURE AQ-2: Additional Construction Measures. The following BAAQMD Additional Construction Mitigation Measures shall be included in contract specifications for construction: a. Use low volatile organic compounds (VOC) (i.e., reactive organic gases [ROG]) coatings beyond the BAAQMD requirements (i.e., Regulation 8, Rule 3: Architectural Coatings). b. VOC content of architectural coatings shall not exceed 150 grams VOC per liter of coating. 22. AIR QUALITY MITIGATION MEASURE AQ-3: Additional NOx Reduction Construction Measures. The following limitations shall be included in contract specifications for construction and adhered to during soil hauling activities (during mass and fine grading) for each construction phase in order to ensure NOx emissions would be reduced to less -than -significant levels (phasing parameters are defined in the URBEMIS2007 Assumptions included in Appendix A of Attachment 2 of the Initial Study): • Phase 1: Trucks hauling soil during Phase 1 shall not travel more than 23 miles roundtrip. Daily vehicle miles traveled (VMT) during mass grading shall not exceed 1,416; daily VMT during fine grading shall not exceed 425. • Phase 2: Trucks hauling soil during Phase 2 shall not travel more than 26 miles roundtrip. Daily VMT during mass grading shall not exceed 1,629; daily VMT during fine grading shall not exceed 671. • Phase 3: Trucks hauling soil during Phase 3 shall not travel more than 36 miles roundtrip. Daily VMT during mass grading shall not exceed 2,318; daily VMT during fine grading shall not exceed 625. The contractor shall log VMTs daily and submit to the Town monthly. These limitations shall be stipulated in construction bids, plans, and specifications. 23. AIR QUALITY MITIGATION MEASURE AQ-5: Operational Risk Reduction Measures. A minimum 261-foot setback from the freeway shall be required for proposed residential uses and is considered by the BAAQMD to be sufficient to mitigate any potentially significant impacts on any residential uses to unhealthful levels of TACs or PM2.s. 24. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES MITIGATION MEASURE BIO-1: Protection of Nesting Birds during Construction. The following measures shall be implemented prior to any on - site construction activities: a. Tree and shrub removal, pruning, and structure demolition should be conducted outside of the breeding season between September 1 and January 31 to avoid impacts to nesting birds. b. If tree and shrub removal, pruning, and structure demolition must occur during the breeding season (February 1 to August 31), preconstruction surveys shall be conducted within the project footprint and a 300-foot buffer, by a qualified biologist 4 no more than two weeks prior to equipment or material staging, pruning/grubbing or surface -disturbing activities. If no active nests are found, no further measures are necessary. c. If active nests i.e. nests with eggs or young birds present, of special -status or migratory birds are found, non -disturbance buffers shall be established at a distance sufficient to minimize disturbance based on the nest location, topography, cover, the nesting pair's tolerance to disturbance and the type/duration of potential disturbance. No work shall occur within the non -disturbance buffers until the young have fledged, as determined by a qualified biologist. Buffer size should be determined in cooperation with the CDFG and the USFWS. If buffers are established and it is determined that project activities are resulting in nest disturbance, work should cease immediately and the CDFG and the USFWS should be contacted for further guidance. d. If active raptor nests are found within 300 feet of construction activities, a qualified biologist shall be on site to monitor the nests for signs of breeding/rearing disruption. If it is determined that any construction activity is resulting in nest disturbance, work shall cease immediately and the CDFG and the USFWS shall be contacted to develop protective measures. 25. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES MITIGATION MEASURE BIO-2: Protection of Riparian Habitat during Construction. Project implementation would require the operation of heavy equipment and machinery for an extended period of time, increasing the level of human activity, noise, lighting, and drifting dust, potentially disrupting wildlife breeding and normal activities in the adjacent Los Gatos Creek riparian habitat. Such effects may reach significant levels without the incorporation of following measures: a. Project construction activities shall be restricted to daylight hours; nighttime work shall not be permitted. b. Use of elevated floodlights shall not be permitted; any exterior lighting shall be directed inward and shall not cause the illumination of the adjacent riparian habitat. c. Vehicle/equipment operations in the vicinity of the riparian corridor shall be minimized to the extent practicable. d. Dust control must be practiced during demolition and grading. 26. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES MITIGATION MEASURE BIO-3: Protection of Riparian Habitat during Project Operation. Implementation of any of the proposed scenarios could result in increased lighting of the riparian corridor at Los Gatos Creek. The mixed -use scenarios could also result in increased interaction between wildlife and domestic pets. Such effects may reach significant levels without the incorporation of following measures: a. The lighting of the selected scenario shall ensure that exterior lighting is directed inward and shall not cause the illumination of the adjacent riparian habitat. b. Restrictions shall be in placed to prevent the placement of pet food containers out-of- doors in areas accessible to wildlife. c. Free -roaming domestic pets (e.g. cats, off -leash dogs) shall not be permitted. d. All exterior trash receptacles shall be designed and maintained to exclude wildlife. 5 27. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES MITIGATION MEASURE BIO-4: Tree Protection and Replacement. In order to provide appropriate mitigation for the loss of Ordinance - protected trees, the following measures would be required: a. The project proponent shall secure a Tree Removal Permit from the Town of Los Gatos prior to removing or grading within the dripline of any protected tree. b. For the worst -case condition of tree impacts and the Town's tree replacement formula, the maximum number and sizes of replacement trees that could be required are indicated as follows, but could be less depending on the final development design: Number of Trees Size 1282 24" box sized trees, and 4 36" box sized trees, and 4 48" box sized trees. or 54 36" box sized trees, and 236 48" box sized trees. Actual tree replacement would be based upon the final permitted number of trees removed. c. If a tree cannot be reasonably planted on the subject property, the value of the removed tree(s) shall be paid to the Town Forestry Fund to: • Add or replace trees on public property I the vicinity of the subject property, or • Replacement value of a tree shall be determined using the most recent edition of the Guide for Plant Appraisal, as prepared by the Council of Tree and Landscape Appraisers. d. Although the adjacent Los Gatos Creek corridor is not Town property, belonging to the Santa Clara Valley Water District, the Town may also consider accepting riparian habitat restoration and enhancement activities as compensation for the loss of some protected trees on the subject property. As described above, the riparian habitat is degraded by the presence of invasive non-native trees, which could be removed and replaced with native riparian trees. From the perspective of CEQA, enhancement and restoration of the adjacent riparian habitat would satisfactorily mitigate tree impacts resulting from project implementation. e. The project sponsor shall avoid planting ornamental species reported by the California Invasive Plant Council to have the potential to be invasive. Species on this list that can spread by wind—borne seed shall be prohibited from use in landscaping. The proposed list of landscaping species for the project shall be reviewed and approved by the Town. f. In addition to conformance to the Tree Protection Ordinance, the Town arborist's (Deborah Ellis, February 18, 2011) report also outlines protective measures before and during construction. Additional tree protection guidelines are presented in the Tree Protection Ordinance Section 29.10.1005. These measures shall be implemented. 6 g. During construction, accidental injury or removal to and protected trees shall be reported immediately to the Town and appropriate measures taken, as identified by the Town, to mitigate the non -permitted damage and to prevent further accidental impacts. h. The Town shall implement recommendations made by the Town's consulting arborist, Deborah Ellis, in her February 18, 2011 report. These measures encompass design guideline recommendations encompassing the establishment of a Tree Protection Zone to preclude the disturbance of trees to be retained on the project site, erosion control measures, drainage control, and tree replacement requirements. In addition, the arborist's report presents tree protection measures to be implemented before and during project construction. These recommendations are included as Attachment 3 of this study. 28. CULTURAL RESOURCES MITIGATION MEASURE CUL-1: Archaeological Monitor. A qualified archaeologist shall be retained to monitor the site clearing and grading operations in those areas where buildings will be removed and/or new construction will occur. The archaeologist shall be present on -site to observe site clearing at a representative sample of building removal areas until he/she is satisfied that there is not longer a potential for finding buried resources. In the event that any potentially significant archaeological resources are discovered, the project archaeologist shall stop work inside a zone designated by him/her where additional archaeological resources could be found. A plan for the evaluation of the resource shall be submitted to the Community Development Director for approval. Evaluation normally takes the form of limited hand excavation and analysis of materials and information removed to determine if the resource is eligible for inclusion on the California Register of Historic Resources (CRHR). 29. CULTURAL RESOURCES MITIGATION MEASURE CUL-2: Identification of Eligible Resources. If an eligible resource is identified, a plan for mitigation of impacts to the resource shall be submitted to the Los Gatos Community Development Department for approval before any additional construction related earthmoving can occur inside the zone designated as archaeologically sensitive. Mitigation could include additional hand excavation to record and remove for analysis significant archaeological materials, combined with additional archaeological monitoring of soils inside the archaeologically sensitive zone. 30. CULTURAL RESOURCES MITIGATION MEASURE CUL-3: Discovery of Human Remains. Required monitoring will also serve to identify and hopefully reduce damage to human burials and associated grave goods. In the event that human remains are discovered, it shall be the responsibility of the project archaeologist to contact the County Coroner's Office and the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC). The NAHC is responsible for naming a Most Likely Descendant (MLD) who shall represent tribal interests in regards to human remains and associated grave goods. The MLD shall make recommendations to the Community Development Director regarding the method for exposure and removal of human burials and associated grave goods, and shall advise the Community Development Director regarding the place and method of reburial of these materials. 7 31. GEOLOGIC MITIGATION MEASURE GEO-1: Detailed Geotechnical Investigations. The project sponsor shall ensure that a design -level geotechnical investigation is conducted for each planned site improvement. The recommendations of the geotechnical investigation shall be incorporated in the final construction plans for the proposed project. These recommendations shall address liquefaction, lateral spreading, ground rupture due to liquefaction, and differential compaction. 32. GEOLOGIC MITIGATION MEASURE GEO-2: Undocumented Fill. The project sponsor shall require the removal of undocumented fill materials within proposed building excavations. Reuse of the fill materials shall only be allowed if they meet the requirements for engineered fill. Otherwise, imported engineered fill shall be required for building excavations. Undocumented fill materials that do not meet the requirements for engineered fill shall be reused for landscaping or in non-structural fill areas, or shall be disposed of off -site. 33. GREENHOUSE GASES MITIGATION MEASURE GHG-1: A combination of the following list of sustainability and design features shall be incorporated into uses ultimately developed on the project site to achieve the overall scaled reduction in GHG emissions necessary to meet the BAAQMD's significance threshold of 4.6 MT of GHG per service population per year). For example, based on development project scenarios reviewed in this report, scaled reductions would be required are as follows: 44.34 percent for Scenarios 1 and 2, 18.5 percent for Scenario 3, and 46 percent for Scenario 4. Prior to issuance of building permits, the project applicant shall demonstrate required scaled reductions are achieved through incorporation of a combination of sustainable project design features. Each measure and associated GHG reduction shall be identified and included on all project plans and specifications. One or more of the following sustainability and design features, or other measures that may become available in the future, shall be included to achieve the required scaled reductions in GHG emissions: • Provide secure on -site bike parking (ratio shall be at least one space per 20 vehicle spaces). • Provide information on transportation alternatives (i.e., bus schedules and maps) accessible to employees within each proposed building. • Provide preferential on -site carpool/vanpool parking. • Increase energy efficiency beyond Title 24 by 20 percent. • Install smart meters and programmable thermostats. • Plant shade trees within 40 feet of the south side or within 60 feet of the west sides of the buildings. • Install roofs with highly reflective materials (albedo of at least 30) to reduce cooling load. • Meet 2010 Green Building Code Standards. Seal heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) ducts to enhance efficiency and reduce energy loss. • Include solar photovoltaic or other technology to generate electricity on -site to reduce consumption from the electrical grid. • Implement employee telecommuting program. • Provide showers/changing facilities on -site for employee use. 8 • Implement an on -site carpool matching program for employees. • Provide on -site amenities (i.e., eating and other establishments). • Increase the project design by 100 percent (i.e., presence of transit -oriented development design guidelines, complete street standards). • Work with the Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD) to implement acceptable off -site mitigation. This involves an agreement with the BAAQMD and payment of fees or the purchase of carbon credits. The BAAQMD would commit to reducing the type and amount of emissions identified in the agreement. 34. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS MITIGATION MEASURE HAZ-1: Hazardous Materials Removal. The following measures shall be required to reduce public health risks related to removal and disposal of hazardous materials to a less -than - significant level: a. The project sponsor shall retain a qualified professional to update the environmental database review performed as part of the Phase 1 ESA no more than three months prior to the start of any construction activities that would involve disturbance of greater than 50 cubic yards of soil. The qualified professional shall prepare a report summarizing the results of the environmental database review that assesses the potential for any identified chemical release sites to affect soil quality at the proposed project site and identifies appropriate soil analysis to evaluate the potential for soil contamination at the proposed project site, if needed. b. The project sponsor shall retain a qualified professional to conduct appropriate sampling to assess the presence and extent of chemicals in the soil as needed for all construction activities under the proposed project that require disturbance of greater than 50 cubic yards of soil. To evaluate the potential for the presence of pesticides and metals, sample analysis shall include dioxins and furans, chlorinated herbicides, chlorinated pesticides, and California Title 22 metals at a minimum. If contamination from a nearby site is indicated by the environmental database review conducted in accordance with Mitigation Measure HAZ-la, then additional analysis shall be conducted in accordance with the recommendations of the qualified professional. The project sponsor shall also be required to notify the regulatory agencies if the concentration of any chemical exceeded its respective screening level. c. For excavation activities where chemical concentrations exceed environmental screening levels, the project sponsor shall require the construction contractor to prepare and to implement a site safety plan, based on the results of sampling conducted as specified in Mitigation Measure HAZ-lb, identifying the chemicals present, potential health and safety hazards, monitoring to be performed during site activities, soils -handling methods required to minimize the potential for exposure to harmful levels of the chemicals identified in the soil, appropriate personnel protective equipment, and emergency response procedures. d. If chemical concentrations exceed environmental screening levels, the project sponsor shall require the construction contractor(s) to prepare a material disposal plan, based on the results of sampling conducted as specified in Mitigation Measure HAZ-lb, for excess soil produced during construction activities. The plan shall specify the disposal method for soil, approved disposal site, and written documentation that the disposal 9 site will accept the waste. If appropriate, materials may be disposed of on -site, under foundations or in other locations in accordance with applicable hazardous waste classifications and disposal regulations. The contractor shall be required to submit the plan to the project sponsor for acceptance prior to implementation. During construction, excess soil from construction activities shall be stockpiled and sampled to determine the appropriate disposal requirements in accordance with applicable hazardous waste classification and disposal regulations. e. The project sponsor shall require the construction contractor(s) to have a contingency plan for sampling and analysis of potential hazardous materials and for coordination with the appropriate regulatory agencies, in the event that previously unidentified hazardous materials are encountered during construction. If any hazardous materials are identified, the contractor(s) shall be required to modify their health and safety plan to include the new data, conduct sampling to assess the chemicals present, and identify appropriate disposal methods. Evidence of potential contamination includes soil discoloration, suspicious odors, the presence of USTs, or the presence of buried building materials. As discussed in Mitigation Measure HAZ-lb, the project sponsor would remove and notify the regulatory agencies of a discovered release. The assigned lead agency would oversee all aspects of the site investigation and remedial action; and determine the adequacy of the site investigation and remediation activities at the site. 35. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS MITIGATION MEASURE HAZ-2: Hazardous Building. Materials Removal. Prior to demolition of a building, the project sponsor shall incorporate into contract specifications the requirement that the contractor(s) have a hazardous building materials survey completed by a Registered Environmental Assessor or a registered engineer. This survey shall be completed prior to any demolition activities associated with the project. If any friable asbestos -containing materials or lead -containing materials are identified, adequate abatement practices, such as containment and/or removal, shall be implemented in accordance with applicable laws prior to demolition. Any PCB -containing equipment, fluorescent light tubes containing mercury vapors, and fluorescent light ballasts containing DEHP shall also be removed and legally disposed of. 36. NOISE AND VIBRATION MITIGATION MEASURE NOI-1: Detailed Acoustical Analysis for Residential Uses. During the Architecture and Site review process, noise attenuation measures, as specified by an acoustical engineer, shall be incorporated into the project design to ensure that noise levels in usable outdoor areas meet the Town's 65- dBA (DNL) land use compatibility guideline for multi -family residential uses and interior noise levels meet Town's and State (Title 24) interior standard of 45 dBA (DNL). Noise attenuation measures that could be incorporated into the design to achieve these limits include: • Provision of acoustically -effective barriers or deck railings to meet the 65-dBA (DNL) exterior limit. • Provision of closed windows and mechanical ventilation to achieve the 45-dBA (DNL) interior standard. 10 37. NOISE AND VIBRATION MITIGATION MEASURE NOI-2: Construction -Related Vibration Limits. To prevent cosmetic damage to existing adjacent structures, the project contractor shall restrict equipment operations within 25 feet of adjacent structures, whereby surface vibration will be limited to no more than 0.2 in/sec PPV, measured at the closest residential structures. 38. NOISE AND VIBRATION MITIGATION MEASURE NOI-3: Construction -Related Noise Abatement: The project contractor shall demonstrate that the project complies with the following: a. Construction contracts specify that all construction equipment, fixed or mobile, shall be equipped with properly operating and maintained mufflers and other state required noise attenuation devices, and not exceed the ordinance noise limit of 85 dBA at 25 feet. b. Property occupants located adjacent to the project boundary shall be sent a notice, at least 15 days prior to commencement of construction of each phase, regarding the construction schedule of the proposed project. A sign, legible at a distance of 50 feet shall also be posted at the project construction site. All notices and signs shall be reviewed and approved by the Town of Los Gatos Public Works and Community Development Department prior to mailing or posting and shall indicate the dates and duration of construction activities, as well as provide a contact name and a telephone number where residents can inquire about the construction process and register complaints. c. The Contractor shall provide, to the satisfaction of the Town of Los Gatos Public Works and Community Development Departments, a qualified "Noise Disturbance Coordinator." The Disturbance Coordinator shall be responsible for responding to any local complaints about construction noise. When a complaint is received, the Disturbance Coordinator shall notify the Town within 24 hours of the complaint and determine the cause of the noise complaint (e.g., starting too early, bad muffler, etc.) and shall implement reasonable measures to resolve the complaint, as deemed acceptable by the Public Works and Community Development Departments. All notices that are sent to residential units immediately surrounding the construction site and all signs posted at the construction site shall include the contact name and the telephone number for the Disturbance Coordinator. d. Construction haul routes shall be designed to avoid noise -sensitive uses (e.g., residences, convalescent homes, etc.). e. During construction, stationary construction equipment shall be placed such that emitted noise is directed away from sensitive noise receivers. f. Pursuant to the Town of Los Gatos Municipal Code Section 16.20.035, construction activities shall occur between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m. on weekdays, and 9:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m. on weekends and holidays. Additionally, pursuant to Municipal Code Section 16.20.035(2) the Contractor shall demonstrate, to the satisfaction of the Town of Los Gatos Community Development (Building) Department, that construction noise shall not exceed 85 dBA outside of the property line. 39. TRANSPORTATION & TRAFFIC MITIGATION MEASURE TRA-1: Winchester Boulevard and Albright Way (Unsignalized Intersection #4). The necessary improvements to mitigate project and cumulative impacts at this intersection consist of 11 the signalization of the intersection with protected left -turn phasing on Winchester Boulevard. Intersection level of service would improve to LOS B during both peak hours with the improvements. However, based upon vehicular queuing analysis, it is. recommended that the project entrance at Winchester Boulevard and Albright Way be restricted to right -turn in and out only and a new signalized project entrance be provided along Winchester Boulevard approximately 200 feet south of Albright Way. The new signalized entrance will be aligned with the entrance to the Courtside Club forming a new four -legged signalized intersection with signal interconnect to the signals at Winchester Boulevard and Wimbledon Drive and Winchester Boulevard and State Route 85 (S). The close spacing of only 400 feet between the new signal and the signal at Wimbledon Drive will require that the two signals be interconnected and signal timing to be synchronized. Alternate configurations may be possible to accommodate specific project phasing. Any interim alternate configurations must provide a level of service that conforms to the Town's Traffic Impact Policy. 40. TRANSPORTATION & TRAFFIC MITIGATION MEASURE TRA-2: University Avenue and Lark Avenue (Unsignalized Intersection #7). The necessary improvements to mitigate project and cumulative impactsat this intersection consist of the signalization of the intersection with signal interconnect to and coordination with the signal at Winchester Boulevard and Lark Avenue. Intersection level of service would improve to LOS B and C during the AM and PM peak hours, respectively, with the improvements. It should be noted that this intersection is projected to operate at unacceptable levels under Town of Los Gatos 2020 General Plan Conditions. The Town of Los Gatos Draft 2020 General Plan identifies the above improvement as a roadway improvement necessary to accommodate the future development allowed under the 2020 General Plan. However, due to the lack of dedicated funding sources for the improvements identified in the General Plan, this improvement cannot be assumed to be completed under Project Conditions. Therefore, the project will be required to fund and construct the improvement, unless other development is identified that will contribute a 'fair share' amount toward the implementation of the improvement. 41. TRANSPORTATION & TRAFFIC MITIGATION MEASURE TRA-3: Winchester Boulevard and Lark Avenue (Signalized Intersection #6). The developer . shall interconnect and synchronize the traffic signals at the Lark/University, Winchester/Lark, Winchester/Wimbledon, and Winchester/New project entry intersections to mitigate pre - and post -project queues at the Lark Avenue intersection by preventing them from extending into the Wimbledon Drive intersection.1 The interconnection and synchronization improvements shall be completed prior to issuance of the first certificate of occupancy for the development phase that triggers project entry signalization. 42. TRANSPORTATION & TRAFFIC MITIGATION MEASURE TRA-4: Pedestrian and Bicycle Access. In order to avoid potential pedestrian safety hazards, the project applicant shall install appropriate fencing along the east side of Winchester Boulevard to prevent 1 These improvements are based on an operational study of the interconnection and synchronization of traffic signals at Lark/University, Winchester/Lark, Winchester/Wimbledon, and Winchester/New project entry that was prepared Hexagon Transportation Consultants, Inc. in June 2011. The study concluded that interconnection and synchronization of these signals would fully mitigate project queuing impacts without the need to lengthen turn pockets. 12 pedestrians from trying to cross the railroad tracks. Further, all required improvements along Winchester Boulevard (including those specified in Mitigation Measure TRA-1 through TRA-3) shall be designed to accommodate the proposed Class II bikeway designated by the 2020 General Plan for Winchester Boulevard between Lark avenue and the northern town limit. 43. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC MITIGATION MEASURE TRA-5: Parking Survey. During the Architecture and Site review process, a parking survey shall be completed at other comparable facilities in the region in order to determine adequacy of proposed parking for senior residents as well as senior facility staff under Scenario 4. Building Division 44. PERMITS REQUIRED: A building permit shall be required for the construction of each new structure. Separate building permits are required for site retaining walls, swimming pools, etc; separate electrical, mechanical, and plumbing permits shall be required as necessary. 45. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: The Conditions of Approval shall be stated in full on the cover sheet of the construction plan submitted for building permit. 46. PLANS. The construction plans for this project shall be prepared under direct supervision of a licensed architect or engineer (Business and Professionals Code Section 5538). 47. DEMOLITION REQUIREMENTS: Obtain Building Department - Demolition Applications and Bay Area Air Quality Management Applications from the Building Department Service Counter. Once the demolition forms have been completed, all signatures obtained, and written verification from PG&E that all utilities have been disconnected, return the completed form to the Building Department Service Counter with the J# Certificate, PG&E verification, and three (3) sets of site plans to include all existing structures, existing utility service lines such as water, sewer, and PG&E. No demolition work shall be done without first obtaining a permit from the Town. $: ---- SOILS REPORT: Two copies of a soils report, prepared to the satisfaction of the Building Official, containing foundation and retaining wall design recommendations, shall be submitted with the building permit application. This report shall be prepared by a licensed civil engineer specializing in soils mechanics. 49. FOUNDATION INSPECTIONS: A pad certificate prepared by a licensed civil engineer or land surveyor shall be submitted to the project building inspector upon foundation inspection. This certificate shall certify compliance with the recommendations as specified in the soils report and the building pad elevation and on -site retaining wall locations and elevations are prepared according to approved plans. Horizontal and vertical controls shall be set and certified by a licensed surveyor or registered civil engineer for the following items: a. Pad elevation b. Finish floor elevation c. Foundation corner locations 50. TITLE 24 ENERGY COMPLIANCE: All required California Title 24 Energy, Compliance Forms must be blue -lined, i.e. directly printed, onto a plan sheet(s). 51. SPECIAL INSPECTIONS. When special inspections are required by CBC Section 1704, the architect or engineer of record shall prepare an inspection program that shall be 13 submitted to the Building Official for approval prior to issuance of the Building Permit. The Town Special Inspection form must be completely filled out and signed by all requested parties prior to issuance of the Building Permit. Special Inspection Forms are available from the Building Division Service Counter or online at www.losgatosca. gov/building. 52. NPDES-C.3 DATA FORMS: A copies of the NPDES C.3 Data Forms (updated based on the final construction drawings) must be blue -lined in full on the plans. In the event that this data differs significantly from any Planning approvals, the Town may require recertification of the project's storm water treatment facilities prior to release of the Building Permit. 53. BACKWATER VALVES: The scope of this project may require the installation of sanitary sewer backwater valves per Town Ordinance 6.50.025. Please provide information on the plans if backwater valves are required and the locations of the installations. The Town of Los Gatos Ordinance and West Valley Sanitation District (WVSD) requires backwater valves on drainage piping serving, fixtures that have flood level rims less than 12-inches above the elevation of the next upstream manhole. 54. NON -POINT SOURCE POLLUTION STANDARDS:. The Town standard Santa Clara Valley Non -point Source Pollution Control Program specification sheet shall be part of plan submittal. The specification sheet is available at the Building Division service counter. 55. GREEN BUILDING STANDARDS: This project must, at a minimum, be in compliance with the Nonresidential Mandatory Measures of the 2010 California Green Building Standards Code. 56. SITE ACCESSIBILITY: At least one accessible route within the boundary of the site shall be provided from public transportation stops, accessible parking and accessible passenger loading zones and public streets or sidewalks to the accessible building entrance they serve. The accessible route shall, to the maximum extent feasible, coincide with the route for the general public. At least one accessible route shall connect accessible buildings, facilities, elements and spaces that are on the same site. If access is provided for pedestrians from a pedestrian tunnel or elevated walkway, entrances to the building from each tunnel or walkway must be accessible. 57. ACCESSIBLE PARKING: The parking lot, as well as the parking structure, where parking is provided for the public as clients, guests or employees, shall provide handicap accessible parking. Accessible parking spaces serving a particular building shall be located on the shortest accessible route of travel from adjacent parking to an accessible entrance. In buildings with multiple accessible entrances with adjacent parking, accessible parking spaces shall be dispersed and located closest to the accessible entrances. The number of accessible parking spaces required is established by CBC Table 11B-6. 58. PLUMBING FACILITIES: Plumbing facilities and fixtures shall be provided for the type of building occupancy and in the minimum numbers established in California Plumbing Code Table 4-1. Adequate area to accommodate these facilities must be determined. 59. MEANS OF EGRESS: Required exits shall discharge directly to the exterior of the building or through a rated passageway providing direct access to the exterior of the building. The exit discharge shall not reenter a building. 14 60. ADDITIONAL AGENCY APPROVALS REQUIRED: The project following agency approvals before issuance of a building permit: a. West Valley Sanitation District: 378-2407 b. Santa Clara County Fire Department: 378-4010 c. Bay Area Air Quality Management District: (415) 771-6000 d. The Town will forward the paperwork to the appropriate processing. A copy of the paid receipt is required prior to permit issuance. requires the school district(s) for TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE PARKS AND PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR: Engineering Division 61. GENERAL: All public improvements shall be made according to the latest adopted Town Standard Drawings and the Town Standard Specifications, subject to the provisions of any applicable Development Agreement. All work shall conform to the applicable Town ordinances. The adjacent public right-of-way shall be kept clear of all job related dirt and debris at the end of the day. Dirt and debris shall not be washed into storm drainage facilities. The storing of goods and materials on the sidewalk and/or the street will not be allowed unless a special permit is issued. The developer's representative in charge shall be at the job site during all working hours. Failure to maintain the public right-of-way according to this condition may result in the Town performing the required maintenance at the developer's expense. 62. DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT: The applicant shall enter an agreement to construct public improvements in accordance with Town Code 24.40.020, subject to the provisions of any applicable Development Agreement. 63. GRADING PERMIT: A grading permit is required for site grading and drainage. The grading permit application (with grading plans) shall be made to the Engineering Division of the Parks & Public Works Department located at 41 Miles Avenue. The grading plans shall include final grading, drainage, retaining wall location, driveway, utilities and interim erosion control. Grading plans shall list earthwork quantities and a table of existing and proposed impervious areas. Unless specifically allowed by the Parks and Public Works Director, the grading permit will be issued concurrently with the building permit. The grading permit is for work outside the building footprint(s). A separate building permit, issued by the Building Department at 110 E. Main Street is needed for grading within the building footprint. 64. GRADING PERMIT PHASING: Phased grading permits may be allowed if approved by the Town Attorney and the Parks and Public Works Director. Phasing may relate to development phases or to multiple grading permits within a development phase, such as early release of a grading permit prior to release of the building permit. Bonding of early grading improvements may be required. 65. TENTATIVE MAP: A tentative map and A&S approval are required for each development phase, prior to submittal for a final or parcel map for that phase. Phased final maps shall be permitted. 66. SUBDIVISION MAP: A final or parcel map shall be recorded. Two copies of the final / parcel map shall be submitted to the Engineering Division of the Parks & Public Works Department for review and approval. Submittal shall include closure calculations, title reports and appropriate fee. The map shall be recorded before any building permits are 15 issued. A&S and Tentative Map planning applications shall be approved for each development phase before a parcel or final map for that phase is recorded. 67. SUBDIVISION MAP 2: A parcel map shall be recorded to adjust lot lines from seven existing parcels to seven future parcels, abandon existing public right of way, and grant necessary public easements. The timing of map recordation in relation to issuance of building permits shall be determined by the Directors of Community Development and Parks and Public Works. The map shall be recorded prior to issuance of the first certificate of occupancy at the latest. 68. CC&R's: CC&R's shall be submitted together with the subdivision map for review and approval by the Town Attorney, Director of Community Development, and Director of Parks and Public Works prior to recordation of the subdivision map. 69. PRIVATE EASEMENT ABANDONMENT: Documents for private easement abandonment shall be submitted, processed, and recorded with the subdivision map. 70. 14600 WINCHESTER BLVD: An ingress egress easement across 14600 Winchester Boulevard shall be recorded with the subdivision map. 71. ENCROACHMENT PERMIT: All work in the public right-of-way will require a Construction Encroachment Permit,. All work over $5,000 will require construction security. 72. DEDICATIONS: The following shall be dedicated on each subdivision map. The dedications shall be recorded before any permits are issued. a. Winchester Boulevard. Right of way as needed to accommodate required frontage and site entry improvements. b. Public Service Easements (PSE), as required. c. Ingress -egress, storm drainage and sanitary sewer easements, as required. d. Emergency Access Easement. Twenty (20) feet wide, extending from the northerly terminus of Charter Oaks, through the project site, to Winchester Blvd. 73. PAD CERTIFICATION: A letter from a licensed land surveyor shall be provided for each building stating that the building foundation was constructed in accordance with the approved plans shall be provided subsequent to foundation construction and prior to construction on the structure. The pad certification shall address both vertical and horizontal foundation placement. 74. DESIGN CHANGES: The Applicant's registered Engineer shall notify the Town Engineer, in writing, at least 72 hours in advance of all differences between the proposed work and the design indicated on the plans. Any proposed changes shall be subject to the approval of the Town before altered work is started. Any approved changes shall be incorporated into the final "as -built" drawings. 75. AS -BUILT PLANS: After completion of the construction of all work, the original plans shall have all changes (change orders and field changes) clearly marked. The "as -built" plans shall again be signed and "wet -stamped" by the civil engineer who prepared the plans, attesting to the changes. The original "as -built" plans shall be review and approved the Engineering Inspector. A Mylar and AutoCAD disk of the approved "as -built" plans shall be provided to the Town before the Faithful Performance Security or Occupancy Permit is released. The AutoCAD file shall include only the following information and shall conform to the layer naming convention: a) Building Outline, Layer: BLDG- OUTLINE; b) Driveway, Layer: DRIVEWAY; c) Retaining Wall, Layer: RETAINING WALL; d) Swimming Pool, Layer: SWIMMING -POOL; e) Tennis Court, Layer: 16 TENNIS -COURT; f) Property Line, Layer: PROPERTY -LINE; g) Contours, Layer: NEWCONTOUR. All as -built digital files must be on the same coordinate basis as the Town's survey control network and shall be submitted in AutoCAD version 2000 or higher. 76. FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATIONS: Finished floor elevations for all new structures shall be higher than the 100-year water surface elevations identified on Flood Insurance Rate Maps current at the time of building permit issuance. 77. PLAN CHECK FEES: Mapping and Grading Permit plan check fees shall be deposited with the Town prior to plan review at the Engineering Division of the Parks and Public Works Department. Fee amounts are as specified in the applicable fee schedule, subject to the provisions of any applicable Development Agreement. 78. INSPECTION FEES: The Inspection fees shall be deposited with the Town prior to issuance of any Permit or recordation of the Final Map. Fee amounts are as specified in the applicable fee schedule, subject to the provisions of any applicable Development Agreement. At the discretion of the Town Engineer, the developer shall fund a Public Works inspector on a time and materials basis as needed for the duration of the mass grading and drainage construction for each development phase, subject to the provisions of any applicable Development Agreement. 79. PUBLIC WORKS INSPECTIONS: The developer or his representative shall notify the Engineering Inspector at least twenty-four (24) hours before starting any work pertaining to on -site drainage facilities, grading or paving, and all work in the Town's right-of-way. Failure to do so will result in rejection of work that went on without inspection. 80. THIRD PARTY INSPECTOR FEES: The applicant shall pay for the inspection of public street lighting and traffic signal related work. Inspections shall be performed by the Town's street lighting and traffic signal contractor. An initial deposit of $5,000 shall be made to the Town prior to issuance of an encroachment or public improvement permit. Inspection will be on a cost recovery basis and additional inspection fees may be required. 81. SOILS ENGINEER CONSTRUCTION - OBSERVATION: During construction, all excavations and grading shall be inspected by the applicant's soils engineer prior to placement of concrete and/or backfill so they can verify that the actual conditions are as anticipated in the design -level geotechnical report, and recommend appropriate changes in the recommendations contained in the report, if necessary. The results of the construction observation and testing should be documented in an "as -built" letter/report prepared by the applicants' soils engineer and submitted to the Town before final release of any occupancy permit is granted. 82. WATER DESIGN: Water plans prepared by SJWC must be reviewed and approved prior to issuance of any permit for each development phase, subject to the discretion of the Town Engineer. 83. STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN: A storm water management shall be included with the grading permit application for all Group 1 and Group 2 projects as defined in the amended provisions C.3 of the amended Santa Clara County NPDES Permit. The plan shall delineate source control measures and BMP's together with the sizing calculations. The plan shall be certified by a professional pre -qualified by the Town. In the event that storm water measures proposed on the A&S approval differ significantly from those certified on the Building/Grading Permit, the Town may require a modification of the 17 A&S approval prior to release of the Building Permit, The applicant may elect to have the A&S submittal certified to avoid this possibility. 84. AGREEMENT FOR STORMWATER BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE OBLIGATIONS: The property owner or Owner's Association, as appropriate, shall enter into an agreement with the Town for maintenance of the stormwater filtration devices required to be installed on this project by Town's Stormwater Discharge Permit and all current amendments or modifications. The agreement will specify that certain routine maintenance shall be performed by the property owner or owner's association, as applicable, and will specify device maintenance reporting requirements. The agreement will also specify routine inspection requirements, permits and payment of fees. The agreement shall be recorded prior to release of any occupancy permits. 85. SITE DRAINAGE: Any storm drain inlets (public or private) shall be stenciled/signed with appropriate "NO DUMPING - Flows to Bay" NPDES required language. 86. NPDES: On -site drainage systems for all projects shall conform to the requirements of the Municipal Regional NPDES Permit that is current at the time of A&S approval for each development phase. Each development phase must . provide, at a minimum, sufficient improvements to treat all development within that phase. Deferral of treatment to future phases will not be allowed. 87. WEST VALLEY SANITATION DISTRICT: All sewer connection and treatment plant capacity fees shall be paid either immediately prior to the recordation of any subdivision map, or immediately prior to the issuance of a sewer connection permit, which ever event occurs first. Written confirmation of payment of these fees shall be provided prior to recordation of each map or issuance of a building permit. 88. SANITARY SEWER LATERAL: Sanitary sewer laterals are televised by West Valley Sanitation District and approved by the Town of Los Gatos before they are used or reused. Install a sanitary sewer lateral clean -out at the property line. 89. SANITARY SEWER BACKWATER VALVE: Drainage piping serving fixtures which have flood level rims less than twelve (12)inches (304.8 mm) above the elevation of the next upstream manhole and/or flushing inlet cover at the public or private sewer system serving such drainage piping shall be protected from backflow of sewage by installing an approved type backwater valve. Fixtures above such elevation shall not discharge through the backwater valve, unless first approved by the Administrative (Sec. 6.50.025). The Town shall not incur any liability or responsibility for damage resulting from a sewer overflow where the property owner or other person has failed to install a backwater valve, as defined section 103(e) of the Uniform Plumbing Code adopted by section 6.50.010 of the Town Code and maintain such device in a functional operating condition. Evidence of West Valley Sanitation District's decision on whether a backwater device is needed shall be provided prior to issuance of a building permit. 90. TRASH ENCLOSURES: Trash enclosures shall be covered and provided with a drain connected to the sanitary sewer system. 91. GREASE TRAPS: Meet all requirements of the Santa Clara County Health Department and West Valley Sanitation District for the interception, separation or pretreatment of effluent. 92. UTILITIES: All new utilities shall be placed underground. 18 93. ABOVE GROUND UTILITIES: The applicant shall submit a 75-percent progress print to the Town for review of above ground utilities including backflow prevention devices, fire department connections, gas and water meters, off-street valve boxes, hydrants, site lighting, electrical/communication/cable boxes, transformers, and mail boxes. Above ground utilities.shall be reviewed and approved by the Community Development Director prior to issuance of any permit for each development phase. 94. UTILITY RELOCATION AND PHASING: Utility and circulation relocation and phasing plans shall be included in the grading permit application package. 95. PHOTOMETRICS: Site lighting photometrics shall be provided with the building permit submittal. The site lighting improvements shall be approved by the Directors of Community Development and Paris and Public Works prior to issuance of a building permit. 96. UTILITY COMPANY REVIEW: Letters from the electric, telephone, cable, and trash companies indicating that the proposed improvements and easements are acceptable shall be provided prior to recordation of each subdivision map. 97. JOINT TRENCH PLANS: Joint trench plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Town prior to recordation of each map. The joint trench plans shall include street and/or site lighting and associated photometrics. A letter shall be provided by PG&E stating that public street light billing will by Rule LS2A, and that private lights shall be metered with billing to the owners association. Pole numbers, assigned by PG&E, shall be clearly delineated on the plans. 98. TRENCHING: Trenching within public streets will be allowed subject to the following requirements: a. The Town standard "T" trench detail shall be used. b. A Town approved colored controlled density backfill shall be used. c. The total asphalt thickness shall be a minimum of 3-inches or shall match the existing thickness, whichever is greater. The final lift shall be 1.5-inches of half inch medium asphalt. The initial lift(s) shall be of three quarter inch medium asphalt. d. The Contractor shall schedule a pre -paving meeting with the Town Engineering Construction Inspector the day the paving is to take place. e. A slurry seal topping may be required by the construction inspector depending his assessment of the quality of the trench paving. If required, the slurry seal shall extend the full width of the street and shall extend 5-feet beyond the longitudinal limits of trenching. Slurry seal materials shall be approved by the Town Engineering Construction Inspector prior to placement. Black sand may be required in the slurry mix. All existing striping and pavement markings shall be replaced upon completion of slurry seal operations. 99. TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE: The developer shall pay the Town Traffic Impact Fee in accordance with the Town Code and Council fee resolution in effect at the time the building permit application is made, subject to the provisions of any applicable Development Agreement. Credit from demolishing existing office use shall be applied toward the new office/R&D space. It shall not be allowed toward the residential use unless there is unused credit after all new office/R&D space A&S applications have been approved. 100. PARKING: Any proposed parking restrictions on public streets must be approved by the LGPD. 19 101. TRAFFIC SIGNAL: A new intersection aligned with the existing Courtside driveway on Winchester Boulevard, and conversion of the existing Albright Way intersection to right - turn in and out shall be provided with the Phase 1 development. Improvements shall be in conformance with Transportation and Traffic Mitigation Measure TRA-1. A full traffic signal, signal interconnection and timing shall be provided prior to issuance of the first certificate of occupancy. No alternate configurations to the TRA-1 improvements will be considered. 102. TRAFFIC SIGNAL TIMING AND SYNCHRONIZATION: The applicant shall provide a proposal from a licensed traffic engineer containing a scope of work and fee for adjusting the timing and synchronizing the traffic signals as required by Transportation and Traffic Mitigation TRA-3. Synchronization shall be performed prior to occupancy of each Phase 1 building, and again once each building has reached a significant level of occupancy. A bond for the re -timing and synchronizing traffic signals up to two times subsequent to the initial work performed prior to occupancy shall be posted with the Town prior to issuance of each certificate of occupancy. 103. BASIS OF TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENT DESIGN: A design level traffic study shall be provided with the Grading Permit application to serveas a basis for design. The study shall address LOS and queuing analysis at all project entries and provide recommendations for minimum queue lengths. 104. TRAFFIC CIRCULATION STUDIES: In connection with the A&S Approval for each development phase, the developer shall prepare design -level circulation plans to address onsite circulation and project entry points from Winchester Boulevard. The plans will identify the configuration of on -site circulation facilities and the configuration of project entry points from Winchester Boulevard, as needed to support each development phase. The plans shall be in accordance with the Traffic Impact Study dated March 17, 2011 previously prepared for the Albright Way Project, and mitigation measures identified therein. The plans shall be funded by the developer and subject to Town Engineer approval. 105. TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENTS: The following traffic improvements shall be provided in addition to those identified in the CEQA review. These improvements shall be substantially complete prior to issuance of the first certificate of occupancy, and fully complete and accepted by the Town prior to the final certificate of occupancy for the applicable development phase. a. New Project Entry. The applicant shall provide detailed intersection traffic analysis for the proposed intersection configuration to Town Engineer for approval. As a minimum, an additional right turn lane entering the project site, additional bike lanes along Winchester Boulevard, and two left -turn lanes exiting the project site shall be required. All cost including and not limited to traffic analysis, design, construction, inspection, and construction management shall be borne by the applicant. The analysis and construction shall address all four legs of the intersection, including the Courtside leg. b. Winchester Blvd./Albright Way. Construct a landscaped median island with turn restriction signage. c. Frontage Improvements. Paint pole and Install LED light fixture for all existing street lights at the project frontage. 20 106. FRONTAGE IMPROVEMENTS: Applicant shall be required to improve the project's public frontage to current Town Standards, subject to the provisions of any applicable Development Agreement. These improvements may include but not limited to curb, gutter, sidewalk, driveway approaches, curb ramps, street lighting (upgrade and/or repaint) etc. 107. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS: Plans for public improvements shall be prepared by a California registered civil engineer, reviewed and approved by the Town, and guaranteed by contract, Faithful Performance Security and Labor & Materials Security before the issuance of a building permit or the recordation of a subdivision map for each development phase. The improvements must be substantially completed prior to issuance of the first certificate of occupancy, fully complete and accepted by the Town prior to issuance of the final Certificate of Occupancy for each development phase. 108. RESTORATION OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS: The developer shall repair or replace all existing improvements not designated for removal that are damaged or removed because of developer's operations. Improvements such as, but not limited to: curbs, gutters, sidewalks, driveways, signs, pavements, raised pavement markers, thermoplastic pavement markings, etc. shall be repaired and replaced to a condition equal to or better than the original condition. A slurry seal shall be provided across the full road width in areas of trenching, road widening, median modification or construction, and where striping has been ground off. Existing improvement to be repaired or replaced shall be at the direction of the Engineering Construction Inspector, and shall comply with all Title 24 Disabled Access provisions. Developer shall request a walk-through with the Engineering Construction Inspector before the start of construction to verify existing conditions. 109. PUBLIC AND PRIVATE IMPROVEMENT SECURITY: The applicant shall supply suitable securities for all public improvements, and private circulation and drainage infrastructure improvements that are a part of the development in a form acceptable to the Town in the amount of 100% (performance) and 100% (labor and material) prior to issuance of any permit for each development phase. Applicant shall provide two (2) copies of documents verifying the cost of the applicable improvements to the satisfaction of the Engineering Division of the Parks and Public Works Department. 110. RETAINING WALLS: A building permit, issued by the Building Department at 110 E. Main Street, may be required for site retaining walls. Walls are not reviewed or approved by the Engineering Division of Parks and Public Works during the grading permit plan review process. 111. SOILS REPORT: One copy of the soils report shall be submitted with each grading permit application. The soils report shall include specific criteria and standards governing site grading, drainage, pavement design, retaining wall design and erosion control. The reports shall be signed and "wet stamped" by the engineer or geologist, in conformance with Section 6735 of the California Business and Professions Code. 112. SOIL EXPORT: The total soil export volume (sum of all development phases) from the site shall not exceed 90,000 cubic yards. The contractor's project engineer shall send daily trucking reports to the Engineering inspector during the export operation of each development phase. 113. HAULING OF SOIL: Hauling of soil on or off -site shall not occur during the morning or evening peak periods (between 7:00 a.m. and 9:00 a.m. and between 4:00 p.m. and 6:00 21 p.m.). Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the developer shall work with the Town Building and Engineering Department Engineering Inspectors to devise a traffic control plan to ensure safe and efficient traffic flow under periods when soil is hauled on or off the project site. This may include, but is not limited to provisions for the developer/owner to place construction notification signs noting the dates and time of construction and hauling activities, or providing additional traffic control. Coordination with other significant projects in the area may also be required. Cover all trucks hauling soil, sand, and other loose debris or require all trucks to maintain at least two feet of freebo ard. 114. SOILSREVIEW: Prior to issuance of each grading permit, the applicant's soils engineer shall review the final grading and drainage plans to ensure that designs for foundations, retaining walls, site grading, and site drainage are in accordance with their recommendations and the peer review comments. The applicant's soils engineer's approval shall then be conveyed to the Town either by letter or by signing the plans. 115. EROSION CONTROL: Interim and final erosion control plans shall be prepared and submitted to the Engineering Division of the Parks & Public Works Department. A Notice of Intent (NOI) and Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) shall be submitted to the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board for projects disturbing more than one acre. A maximum of two weeks is allowed between clearing of an area and stabilizing/building on an area if grading is allowed during the rainy season. Interim erosion control measures, to be carried out during construction and before installation of the final landscaping shall be included. Interim erosion control method shall include, but are not limited to: silt fences, fiber rolls (with locations and details), erosion control blankets, Town standard seeding specification, filter berms, check dams, retention basins, etc. Provide erosion control measures as needed to protect downstream water quality during winter months. The grading, drainage, erosion control plans and SWPPP shall be in compliance with applicable measures contained in the amended provisions C.3 and C.14 of the most current Santa Clara County NPDES MRP Permit. 116. SURVEYING CONTROLS: Horizontal and vertical controls shall be set and certified by` a licensed surveyor or registered civil engineer qualified to practice land surveying, for the following items: a. Retaining wall --top of wall elevations and locations b. Toe and top of cut and fill slopes 117. PRECONSTRUCTION PAVEMENT SURVEY: Prior to issuance of a Grading Permit, the project Applicant shall complete a pavement condition survey documenting the extent of existing pavement defects using a 35-mm or digital video camera. The survey shall extend from the Highway 17 freeway ramps on Lark Avenue along Lark and Winchester to the Campbell City limits. In addition, a pavement deflection analysis conforming to the same limits as the photographic survey shall be performed to determine pavement strength. The results shall be documented in a report and submitted to the Town for review. 118. POSTCONSTRUCTION PAVEMENT SURVEY: The project Applicant shall complete a post construction pavement condition survey and pavement deflection analysis to determine whether road damage occurred as a result of project construction and whether there were changes in pavement strength. Rehabilitation improvements required to restore the pavement to pre -construction condition and strength shall be determined using State 22 of California procedures for deflection analysis. The results shall be documented in a report and submitted to the Town for review and approval. The Applicant shall be responsible for completing any required road repairs prior to release of a certificate of occupancy. 119. TREE REMOVAL: Copies of all necessary tree removal permits shall be provided prior to issuance of any grading permit. 120. DEMOLITION: Any existing structures that would straddle a future property line shall be demolished prior to recordation of the final or parcel map for the applicable phase. 121. DUST CONTROL: Blowing dust shall be reduced by timing construction activities so that paving and building construction begin as soon as possible after completion of grading, and by landscaping disturbed soils as soon as possible. Further, water trucks shall be present and in use at the construction site. All portions of the site subject to blowing dust shall be watered as often as deemed necessary by the Town, or a minimum of three times daily, or apply (non -toxic) soil stabilizers on all unpaved access roads, parking areas, and staging areas at construction sites in order to insure proper control of blowing dust for the duration of the project. Watering on public streets shall not occur. Streets will be cleaned by street sweepers or by hand as often as deemed necessary by the Town Engineer, or at least once a day. Watering -associated with on -site construction activity shall take place between the hours of 8 a.m. and 5 p.m. and shall include at least one late -afternoon watering to minimize the effects of blowing dust. All public streets soiled or littered due to this construction activity shall be cleaned and swept on a daily basis during the workweek to the satisfaction of the Town. Demolition or earthwork activities shall be halted when wind speeds (instantaneous gusts) exceed 25 MPH. All trucks hauling soil, sand, or other loose debris shall be covered. 122. DUST CONTROL (SITES > 4 ACRES): The following measures should be implemented at construction sites greater than four acres in area: a. Hydroseed or apply (non -toxic) soil stabilizers to inactive construction areas (previously graded areas inactive for ten days or more). b. Enclose, cover, water twice daily or apply (non -toxic) soil binders to exposed stockpiles (dirt, sand, etc.) c. Limit traffic speeds on unpaved roads to 15 mph. d. Install sandbags or other erosion control measures to prevent silt runoff to public roadways. e. Replant vegetation in disturbed areas as quickly as possible. 123. SILT AND MUD IN PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY: It is the responsibility of contractor and property owner to make sure that all dirt tracked into the public right-of-way is cleaned up on a daily basis. Mud, silt, concrete and other construction debris SHALL NOT be washed into the Town's storm drains. 124. SIDEWALK CLOSURE: Any proposed blockage or partial closure of the sidewalk requires an encroachment permit. Special provisions such as limitations on works hours, protective enclosures, or other means to facilitate public access in a safe manner may be required. 125. SIDEWALK REPAIR: The developer shall repair and replace to existing Town standards any sidewalk damaged now or during construction of this project. Sidewalk repair shall match existing color, texture and design, and shall be constructed per Town 23 Standard Details. The limits of sidewalk repair will be determined by the Engineering Construction Inspector during the construction phase of the project. 126. CURB AND GUTTER: The developer shall repair and replace to existing Town standards any curb and gutter damaged now or during construction of this project. New curb and gutter shall be constructed per Town Standard Details. The limits of curb and gutter repair will be determined by the Engineering Construction Inspector during the construction phase of the project. 127. PRIVATE EASEMENTS: Agreements detailing rights, limitations, and responsibilities of involved parties shall accompany each private easement. The easements and associated agreements shall be recorded simultaneously with each subdivision map, 128. PRIVATE STREETS: All new streets shall be private. 129. PRECONSTRUCTION MEETING: Prior to issuance of any permit or the commencement of any site work, the general contractor shall: a. Along with the project applicant, attend a pre -construction meeting with the Town Engineer to discuss the project conditions of approval, working hours, site maintenance and other construction matters; b. Acknowledge in writing that they have read and understandthe projectconditions of approval, and will make certain that all project sub -contractors have read and understand them prior to commencing work and that a copy of the project conditions of approval will be posted on site at all times during construction. 130. CONSTRUCTION 'MANAGEMENT PLAN: The Applicant shall submit a construction management plan that shall incorporate at a minimum the Earth Movement Plan, Traffic Control Plan, Project Schedule, site security fencing, employee parking, construction staging area, construction trailer, and proposed outhouse locations. 131. GOOD HOUSEKEEPING: Good housekeeping practices shall be observed at all times during the course of construction. Superintendence of construction shall be diligently performed by a person or persons authorized to do so at all times during working hours. The storing of goods and/or materials on the sidewalk and/or the street will not be allowed unless a special permit is issued by the Engineering Division. The adjacent public right-of-way shall be kept clear of all job related dirt and debris at the end of the day. Dirt and debris shall not be washed into storm drainage facilities: The storing of goods and materials on the sidewalk and/or the street will not be allowed unless a special permit is issued. The developer's representative in charge shall be at the job site during all working hours. Failure to maintain the public right-of-way according to this condition may result in the Town performing the required maintenance at the developer's expense. 132. TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN: The project sponsor will be required to work with the Engineering Division of the Parks and Public Works Department to develop a traffic control plan for incorporation into the construction bid documents (specifications), and this plan will include, but not be limited to, the following measures: a. Construction activities shall be strategically timed and coordinated to minimize traffic disruption for schools, residents, businesses, special events, and other projects in the area. The schools located on the haul route shall be contacted to help with the coordination of the trucking operation to minimize traffic disruption. 24 b. Flag persons shall be placed at locations necessary to control one-way traffic flow. All flag persons shall have the capability of communicating with each other to coordinate the operation. c. Prior to construction, advance notification of all affected residents and emergency services shall be made regarding one-way operation, specifying dates and hours of operation. 133. CONSTRUCTION STREET PARKING: No vehicle having a manufacturer's rated gross vehicle weight exceeding ten thousand (10,000) pounds shall be allowed to park on the portion of a street which abuts property in a residential zone without prior approval from the Town Engineer (§ 15.40.070). 134. COVERED TRUCKS: All trucks transporting materials to and from the site shall be covered. 135. CC&R's: A copy of the CC&R's shall be submitted for review and approval by the Town Attorney and Planning Division prior to map recordation. 136. AIR QUALITY MITIGATION MEASURE AQ-4: Additional DPM Reduction Construction Measures. Prior to the approval of project plans and specifications, the Town Engineer, or his designee, shall confirm that the construction bid packages include a plan demonstrating that the off -road equipment (more than 50 horsepower) to be used in the construction project (i.e., owned, leased, and subcontractor vehicles) will achieve a project wide fleet -average 20 percent NOx reduction and 45 percent diesel particulate matter (DPM) reduction compared to the most recent CARB fleet average. Acceptable options for reducing emissions include the use of late model engines, low -emission diesel products, alternative fuels, engine retrofit technology, after -treatment products, add -on devices such as particulate filters, and/or other options as such become available. These limitations shall be stipulated in construction bids, plans, and specifications, and shall be enforced by the Town Engineer. 137. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS MITIGATION MEASURE USS-1: Preserve or relocate existing eight -inch line sanitary sewer line. During Architecture and Site Review, detailed utility plans shall indicate either preservation or relocation of the existing eight - inch sanitary sewer transmission line to accommodate service for off -site flows north through the site and establish a new sewer easement for this line. In addition, a letter from West Valley Sanitation District stating approval of the project, shall be provided to the Town by the applicant. TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE SANTA CLARA COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT: 138. Review of this development proposal is limited to acceptability of site access and water supply as they pertain to fire department operations, and shall not be construed as a substitute for formal plan review to determine compliance with adopted model codes. Prior to performing any work the applicant shall make application to, and receive from, the Building Department all applicable construction permits. 139. FIRE DEPARTMENT ACCESS MINIMUM CLEAR WIDTH: The minimum clear width of fire department access roads shall be 20 feet. Aerial fire apparatus access roads: Buildings or portions of buildings or facilities exceeding 30 feet (9144 mm) in height above the lowest level of fire department vehicle access shall be provided with approved 25 fire apparatus access roads capable of accommodating fire department aerial apparatus. Overhead utility and power lines shall not be located within the aerial fire apparatus access roadway. Aerial Fire apparatus access roads shall have a minimum unobstructed width of 26 feet (7925) in the immediate vicinity of any building or portion of building more than 30 feet (9144 mm) in height. Proximity to building: At least one of the required access routes meeting this condition shall be located within a minimum of 15 feet (4572) and a maximum of 30 feet (9144mm) from the building, and shall be positioned parallel to one entire side of the building, as approved by the fire code official. CFC Sec. 503 See Pages C-1, C-2.1 and C-2.2 140. ACCESS AND LOADING: Facilities: buildings or portions of buildings hereafter constructed shall be accessible to fire department apparatus by way of an approved fire apparatus access road (including bridges and culverts) with an asphalt, concrete or other approved driving surface capable of supporting the imposed load of fire apparatus weighing at least 75,000 pounds (34050 kg) or as otherwise determined by the fire code official. Minimum clear height: Vertical clearance over required vehicular access roads and driveways shall be 13'6". Grade: Maximum grade shall not exceed 15% (6.75 degrees). Turn Radius (circulating): The minimum outside turning radius is 42 feet .for required access roadways. Greater radius up to 60 feet may be required where the Fire Department determines that Ladder Truck access is required. Circulating refers to travel along a roadway without dead ends. Turning Radius (Cul-de-sacs): The minimum outside turning radius is 36 feet. Use of cul-de-sacs is not acceptable where it is determined by the Fire Department that Ladder Truck access is required, unless greater turning radius is provided. CFC Sec. 503 See Pages C-1, C-2.1 and C-2.2 141. EMERGENCY RESPONDER RADIO COVERAGE: Buildings and structures that cannot support the required level of radio coverage shall be equipped with a radiating cable system, a distributed antenna system with Federal Communications Commission (FCC) -certified signal boosters or other system approved by the fire code official in order to achieve the required adequate radio coverage. CFC J103.1.1 142. FIRE SPRINKLERS WHERE REQUIRED: An automatic fire sprinkler system shall be provided throughout all new buildings and structures. Where the provisions of this code require that a building or portion thereof be equipped throughout with an automatic sprinkler system in accordance with this section, the sprinklers shall be installed throughout in accordance with NFPA 13 except as provided in Section 903.3.1.1.1 and local standards. Note: The owner(s), occupant(s) and any contractor(s) or subcontractor(s) are responsible for consulting with the water purveyor of record in order to determine if any modification or upgrade of the existing water service is required. A State of California licensed (C-16) Fire Protection Contractor shall submit plans, calculations, a completed permit application and appropriate fees to this department for review and approval prior to beginning their work. CFC Sections 903.2.1 through ,903.2.18 as adopted and amended by LGTC 143. POTABLE WATER: Potable water supplies shall be protected from contamination caused by fire protection water supplies. It is the responsibility of the applicant and any contractors and subcontractors to contact the water purveyor supplying the site of such project, and to comply with the requirements of that purveyor. Such requirements shall be incorporated into the design of any water -based fire protection systems, and/or fire 26 suppression water supply systems or storage containers that may be physically connected in any manner to an appliance capable of causing contamination of the potable water supply of the purveyor of record. Final approval of the system(s) under consideration will not be granted by this office until compliance with the requirements of the water purveyor of record are documented by that purveyor as having been met by the applicant(s). 2007 CFC Sec. 903.3.5 and Health and Safety Code 13114.7 144. HOSE VALVES/STANDPIPES REQUIRED: Buildings shall be equipped with standpipes designed per NFPA Std. #14, as amended in Chapter 47, and be equipped with 2-1/2" inch hose valves, at location designated by the fire department. Hose valves/standpipes shall be installed as per the 2010 CFC Sec.' 905, or where emergency access has been deemed minimal, shall be equipped with standpipes designed per NFPA Std. #14, as amended in Chapter 47, and be equipped with 2-1/2" inch hose valves, located within the stair enclosure(s). Note specifically, within parking structure(s) @ stairwells and on podium within courtyard area. 2010 CFC Sec. 905 145. PUBLIC FIRE HYDRANT(S) REQUIRED: Provide public fire hydrant(s) at location(s) to be determined jointly by the Fire Department and San Jose Water Company. Fire hydrants shall be provided along required fire apparatus access roads and adjacent public streets at location(s) to be determined by the Fire Department. Maximum hydrant spacing shall be 500 feet, with a minimum acceptable flow of 1,500 GPM at 20 psi residual pressure. Prior to design, the project civil engineer shall meet with the fire department water supply officer to jointly spot the required fire hydrant locations. 2010 CFC Sec. 507, Apndx. B and C and Tables B106 and C105.1 146. FIRE LANE MARKING REQUIRED: Provide marking for all roadways within the project. Markings shall be per fire department specifications. Installations shall also conform to Local Government Standards and Fire Department Standard Details and Specifications A-6. 2010 CFC Sec. 503.3 147. TIMING OF REQUIRED WATER SUPPLY INSTALLATIONS: Installations of required fire service(s) and fire hydrant(s) shall be tested and accepted by the Fire Department, prior to the start of framing or delivery of bulk combustible materials. Building permit issuance may be withheld until required installations are completed, tested, and accepted. 2010 Sec. 501 148. TIMING OF REQUIRED ROADWAY INSTALLATIONS: Required access roads, up through first lift of asphalt, shall be installed and accepted by the Fire Department prior to the start of combustible construction. During construction, emergency access roads shall be maintained clear and unimpeded. Note that building permit issuance may be withheld until installations are completed. Temporary access roads may be approved on a case by case basis. 2010 Sec. 501 149. PREMISES IDENTIFICATION: Approved numbers or addresses shall be placed on all new and existing buildings in such a position as to be plainly visible and legible from the street or road fronting the property. Numbers shall contrast with their background. CFC Sec. 505 150. NEW COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS: All new commercial buildings shall comply with standard specification SI-7 for construction site fire safety. 151. FIRE HYDRANT LOCATION IDENTIFIER: Prior to project final inspection, the 27 general contractor shall ensure that an approved ("Blue Dot") fire hydrant location identifier has been placed in the roadway, as directed by the fire department. 152. TRAFFIC SIGNAL PREMPTION: As discussed on 8/16/2011, both new and existing traffic signals on Winchester Blvd. and Lark Ave. must be equipped with signal preemption control devices. Contact this office to determine which intersections must be so equipped. 153. CONDITIONS: To prevent plan review and inspection delays, the above noted Developmental Review Conditions shall be addressed as "notes" on all pending and future plan submittals and any referenced diagrams to be reproduced onto the future plan submittal. N:\DEV\CONDITNS\2011\AlbrightA&S.doc 28 John R. Shenk 700 Emerson Street Palo Alto, California 94301 August 10, 2011 The Honorable Chair Sayoc Los Gatos Town Planning Commission Members Town of Los Gatos, 110 East Main Street Los Gatos, CA 95030 Re: PD-10-005 for 90, 100,101, 120, 121, 131,141, 151 and 160 Albright Way and 14600 Winchester Boulevard, Los Gatos — Phase 1 Architecture and Site Approval Honorable Chair Sayoc and Town Planning Commission Members: On behalf of the property owner, LG Business Park, LLC, I am writing to respectfully request the Town Planning Commission's recommendation to the Town Council for approval of our Phase 1 Architecture and Site ("A&S") Approval for the Albright Way project. Our Phase One A&S submittal substantially conforms to the modified Planned Development ("PD") Overlay Zoning, along with the Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, and Development Agreement for the above referenced property heard by the Town Council on August 1, 2011. At the Town Council hearing, we also presented conceptual plans for the first phase of a corporate campus for Netflix, Inc. We have now submitted our A&S application for your review in accordance to the guidance given by the Town Council. Specifically, the Town Council directed: • Architecture and Site applications shall be in substantial conformance with the Official Development Plan including architectural drawings and renderings submitted to Council as part of the PD and DA review and approval; • The first phase shall consist of one four-story building and one five - story building; • Siting of the first phase buildings is to be as indicated in submittals, maximizing open space, setbacks and retention of existing perimeter and internal trees; • High quality architecture and materials will be used for all office buildings, equivalent to submitted drawings and the existing Netflix campus; • Later phase office buildings will be equivalent four and five story buildings to create a campus environment; • All A&S applications for the project shall be reviewed by the Planning Commission, which will formulate a recommendation to the Town Council for final action. All subsequent phases shall also follow this approval process; • The Phase 1 A&S applications to be heard by the Planning Commission on August 24 and acted upon by Council on September 6, assuming the applicant submits all remaining required A&S materials by August 2"d Exhibit 4 Albright Way - Architecture & Site Application August 10, 2011 Page 12 Project Summary The Albright Way site is uniquely situated in the heart of the Vasona Light Rail area, an area identified within the Town of Los Gatos 2020 General Plan as ideal for intensified and mixed - use development. The PD Overlay Zoning provides adequate building height to meet the contemporary requirements of today's technology companies. This means taller, more operationally functional buildings that are efficiently designed, with floor plates that maximize natural light, and a site plan that preserves large and inviting green space between buildings as compared to a sprawling low rise campus with the same amount of building areas. We will seek LEED Silver certification for both of these buildings The height and intensification will make the retention of an existing corporate user possible. Los Gatos' own Netflix, Inc. has identified the Albright Way site as its preferred solution to its need for space and desire for a true headquarters location. They have shared with the Town their timing requirement for new buildings and that they need more height than their current buildings. Phase 1 consists of the demolition and removal of five existing buildings (approximately 109,961 sf) and associated driveways, trees and landscaping. Two new office structures and one parking garage will be developed on +/- 9.9 acres of the site. Five existing buildings (+/- 140,524 sf) will remain on the site on approximately 11.5 acres. "Building D" will be a four story office building with approximately 130,000 sf, and Building E will be a five story office building with approximately 155,000 sf. We anticipate an on site cafeteria use to be incorporated within Building E. The new parking structure will have six parking decks (three above ground and three below ground) and include approximately 1,050 spaces. There will also be 88 new at - grade parking spaces and 491 existing spaces that will remain. Phase 1 Design The design theme is to create "Buildings within the Park". This theme establishes a priority of saving as many healthy large trees as possible while emphasizing the significant amount of landscaped green space facilitated by the taller buildings. We are committed to enhancing the urban forest and maintaining the perimeter trees that provide a tree screen. The site plan has the added benefit of creating landscaped view corridors through the site that help reduce the perceived mass of the development. The architectural style is similar in quality and style to the current Netflix office with enhancements and elements appropriate for this site and use. The land plan is strong and supports a significant inner common area. These types of functional attributes make the density of employees a campus offers very productive and therefore attractive to employers. The design of the buildings themselves show the beneficial effects of the design guidelines (stepbacks, setbacks, materials) as well as the commitment to quality we have offered. These buildings in conjunction with the site plan show that taller can be better. Office The continued commercial/office land use will allow the Town the opportunity to enhance its employment generating land use on the site and dramatically improve the jobs/housing balance. It also is critical to the Town's 2011-13 Strategic Goal related to fiscal stability to facilitate the retention, expansion and attraction of businesses. By granting an A&S approval that will allow this corporate campus development, the Town will lead by example, become a beacon to many companies looking for quality environments Albright Way - Architecture & Site Application August 10, 2011 Page 13 within which to grow and succeed, and show, not only Netflix, but other great employers that the Town understands the needs of companies and is able to accommodate them. PD Overlay Conformance The Phase 1 A&S application that we have submitted for your approval is consistent with the PD Overlay that was approved by the Town Council on August 1, 2011. The proposal includes structures that are less than 85' in height and utilizes the existing perimeter trees, landscaping and topography to reduce the visual impact of the new development. The new office buildings and parking structures have been sited to comply with the setbacks established by the PD Overlay. The proposal reduces impervious surface area on the site and brings the total building coverage on the site to approximately 25 percent, well under the maximum allowed by the PD of 50 percent. The application represents the first phase of the implementation of the PD Overlay and furthers the goals of the Town that were cited in its approval. The proposed PD Overlay Zone allows for the future development and intensification of an existing office development. The project site is located within the Vasona Light Rail area in a location identified by the approved 2020 General Plan as being well suited for more intense office and senior residential development. The application represents a balanced plan that is consistent with the Goals and Policies of the Town of Los Gatos 2020 General Plan. Community Benefits In addition to all standard Town impact and processing fees that apply to the project today, and in addition to the Mitigation Measures identified in the CEQA documents for the project, Phase One will provide the following Community Benefits, in accordance with the Development Agreement:. $370,000 to the Lark/University Avenue Intersection Improvements if constructed by the Town before required for the project • ±$516,000 to a Transportation Improvement Benefit Fund • ±$423,000 to a Community Benefit Fund The Town Council has the discretion to use the undesignated community benefit funds to meet any of the Town's wishes including but not limited to the new Town Library, construction of improvements along the Los Gatos Creek Trail, unfunded capital projects, or other Town priorities. While these are specific community benefit contributions that the project will make to the Town, there are substantial other public benefits generated by approving the Phase One A&S application. Conclusion The Phase One A&S application as currently proposed allows the Town to achieve several of its important community -wide goals. Redeveloping the site into a Transit -Oriented Development is clearly supported by the Town's General Plan and more specifically the Vasona Light Rail Element. In accordance with the Development Agreement, Phase One will make significant contributions to pay for Town -identified priority capital improvement projects. Albright Way — Architecture & Site Application August 10, 2011 Page 14 I respectfully request the Planning Commission's recommendation to the Town Council of approval of the Phase One Architecture and Site application. If you have any questions or would like additional information, please contact me directly at (408) 242-9052 or by email at jshenk@me.com. Respectfully, (Te. John R. Shenk Development Manager Owner's Representative & Applicant John R. Shenk 700 Emerson Street Palo Alto, California 94301 August 10, 2011 Ms. Wendie Rooney Community Development Director Town of Los Gatos Planning Division 110 East Main Street Los Gatos, CA 95031 Re: Albright Way Phase One Architectural and Site Application - Project Description Dear Ms. Rooney: We are pleased to submit our application for Phase One Architectural and Site approval for the Albright Way project. The Phase One project is described below. Phase One consists of the demolition and removal of five existing buildings (approximately 109,961 sf) and associated driveways, trees and landscaping. Two new office structures and one parking garage will be developed on +/- 9.9 acres of the site. Five existing buildings (+/- 140,524 sf) will remain on the site on approximately 11.5 acres. "Building D" will be a four story office building with approximately 130,000 sf, and Building E will be a five story office building with approximately 155,000 sf. We anticipate a cafeteria to be included in Building E. The new parking structure will have six parking decks (three above ground and three below ground) and include approximately 1,050 spaces. There will also be 88 new at -grade parking spaces and 491 existing spaces that will remain. With the completion of Phase 1 the total site will be developed as follows: Site Coverage: Total Building sf: Total Parking Required: Total Parking Provided: 235,465 sf, 25.1% 422,776 sf 1,395 1,626 The site plan and architectural program meets the setbacks and design guidelines established in the PD Overlay for the site and substantially conforms to the Phase One Architecture and Site concept presented to the Town Council on August 1, 2011 and the direction given by the Town Council. For additional details please see the "Netflix Albright Campus Phase One Architectural and Site Package" dated August 2, 2011. Respectfully, John R. Shenk Development Manager Owner's Representative & Applicant This Page Intentionally Left Blank ARCHITECTURE PLANNING URBAN DESIGN August 15, 2011 Mr. Joel Paulson Community Development Department Town of Los Gatos 110 E. Main Street P.O. Box 949) Los Gatos, CA 95031 RE: Albright Netflix Corporate Campus Dear Joel: This review letter will differ slightly from the normal ones in that it will include an identification of issues and recom- me.nclations while also recording some of the conversations from work sessions that I have had with the applicant's design team. I first met with F01721 4 Architects in late July to look at and discuss their plans and elevations to that point of development. We had a good and productive meeting in which I was able to give them my initial impressions, and suggest some areas• for further design exploration. It was a good collaborative discussion, and we generally agreed on several areas for further exploration. Following the recent project hearing before the Town Council, I again met with the architects to discuss the design progress and the observations or suggestions that I had in looking at the formal submit- tal package. My comments and recommendations follow along with my understanding of the further studies that Form 4 Architects is exploring for the upcoming Planning Commission hearing. TEL: EMAIL: 180 HARBOR DRIVE 415.331.3795 algplan@pactTILnet SUITE 219 FAX: 415.331.3797 SAUSALITO . Exhibit 5 Albright Nefflix Corporate Campus Design Review Comments August 15, 2011 Paget Concerns and Recommendations Overview In reviewing the submitted site plan and building design for the Phase 1 project, I believe that they are fundamentally sound. The review continents and the conversations that I have had with Form 4 Arrhitects are focused on incremental improvements to enhance the design and eliminate a few awkward details. Site Plan 1. A trash collection area and transformer are currently proposed for location between the main entry drive and Win- chester Blvd. In discussions with the architects, they indicated that they would explore alternative locations for these ele- ments away from the entry drive, perhaps by dividing and distributing the uses, rather than combining them as shown. A more central location for the trash area would also be desirable since the currently proposed location is relatively remote from Building E. 2. Similarly, the location of a trash enclosure, transformer, and generator on the north side of Building E would be ad- jacent to a major pedestrian path leading from the garage to the entries of both buildings. The architects plan to explore exchanging these elements with the surface parking spaces to the east. 3. I had earlier raised a concern about the long row of parking spaces without landscaped finger island breaks along the entry drive in front of Building D. The architects are proposing special paving in the entry area to soften the appear- ance of the paving. I believe that is an acceptable approach, but the transition point between the special paving and the regular paving seems awkward. My suggestion would be to extend that special paving all the way to the main entry drive, and to also consider a further extension into the access drive from Winchester Blvd. to better define the vehicular access path from Winchester Blvd. to the main entry at the north end of Building D. 4. The paving, landscaping and building entry area between the two buildings may benefit from further study and refinement as the design progresses. The pedestrian access between the buildings and Winchester Blvd. also needs clarifi- cation. Trash and transformer at entry is undesirable Paving, landscaping, and building design to define both building entries will be important area for. : r refinement as the design progresses Site Plan concerns Transition point between regular and special, paving Is at an awkward location CANNON DESIGN GROUP 180 HARBOR DRIVE . SUITE 219 . SAUSALITC) . CA 94965 Albright Nett lis Corporate Campus Design Review Comments August 15, 2011 Page 3 Evaluate redistributing trash and utility elements Consider further extending special paving Into this area of the entry Expand extent of special paving to emphasize main entry Continue refinement of entry areas as the design progresses Site Plan recommendations aSeepizaa Evaluate exchanging locations of parking and trash/transformer/generator Buildings The building design concept has grown out of the successful approach to the current Netfix buildings north of High- way 85. Informal and asymmetrical building forms, with a relatively large amount of solid wall surface and recessed windows, provide a traditional look, and assist in reducing the visual bulk of the structures. The challenge in this project is to further articulate the design to mitigate the taller four and five story building heights. The diagram below shows my comments to staff from the drawings that were reviewed in late July, prior to the Town Council hearing. The designs were modified prior to that meeting, and have been further refined for this submittal. The most notable changes have been to the top floor of both buildings. Visually lighten tower tops and use more glass to relate to bridge between buildings Study somewhat darker color tone in this area with a very Tight top floor to test its effect on perceived building height and bulk Original review comments 07/26/11 Visually ighten and emphasize top floor as building cap using varied design approaches (see example photos) This area of the building seems to work well. Curved form leads to entry. Tower emphasizes entry. Building form Is slightly different. These elements appear a bit bulky and not as integral into the design as other areas of the buildings CANNON DESIGN GROUP 180 HARBOR DRIVE . SUITE 219 . SAUSALITO . CA 94965 Albright Netflix Corporate Campus Design. Review Comments August 15, 2011 page 4 The following are my comments and recommendations along with items discussed with the Form 4 Architects. 1. The architects indicated that a review of floor plate sizes will likely result in some further areas with substantial window recesses on the ground floor. This would be a very positive result. 2. As noted above, a great deal of study has been given to changes on the top floor of the buildings and at the top of the stair towers. That study and refinement continues. Inmy discussions with the architects, we all agreed that the top floor of the stair towers was appearing a bit too grand and perhaps a little "Roman Forum" in appearance. In fairness, it should be noted that is partially a function of the tools economically available in the 3-D modeling program. The architects plan to continue studies on these elements. Those studies may include the elements shown conceptually on the Building E Winchester Blvd. elevation recommendations shown on the following page. They include: • A reduction in the height of the glazed areas at the top of the stair towers. • A decrease in column height. • Investigation of the use of a slightly small scale for the columns. • Investigation of a slightly more contemporary treatment of the columns in -lieu of the historical form currently shown. It would also be desirable to spend some additional design attention on the stair tower that is associated with the main entry to the primary Building D. Dividing bottom four levels of tower into equal height and detail is not an optimal proportion Stair top expression may appear a little bit too grand and "Roman Forum" in appearance_ HMI1e Tower top over main entry should arguably be more special. Tile roof termination seems awkwardhere Secondary' entry could be. refined It could become a major entry later. Trellis canopy seems weak for an entry. Sketch view from Winchester Blvd, Tile roof termination seems better here 3. The division of the lower portion of the stair towers currently have an awkward 50/50 split of height and de- tail - an approach that is usually less successful that variation between floor groupings. The architects are planning on looking at some changes to the bottom two floors of the stair towers along the lines of what is shown on the BuildingE Winchester Blvd, elevation recommendation diagram on thefollowing page. This would produce a stronger base for the tower, and assist in reducing their apparent visual height. 4. The secondary entry on Building E, facing the guest parking along Winchester Blvd., still seems awkward to me. This will be a secondary entry for Netflix operations, but will be used by many who are frequent visitors to the building. The architects wish to emphasize it enough to avoid the perception that the main entry is somehow at the prominent stair tower to the north. I believe that we agreed that the trellis structure that is shown at the entry, while it does echo the trellises over building decks on upper levels of the building, is not a very strong entry feature. Ideas that were discussed, but not unanimously accepted include those shown of the Building E Winchester Blvd. recommendations diagram below CANNON DESIGN GROUP 180 HARBOR DRIVE . SUITE 219 . SAUSALITO . CA 94965 Albright Nettlix Corporate Campus Design Review Comments August 15, 2011 Pagc 5 They include the following, but there are other ways to accomplish the goals, and the architects will explore options. • Replacing the trellis with a stronger entry canopy. • Deeply recessing the entry area from the exterior wall face. • Adding a hip roof element over the entry element similar to those over the stair towers at the roof line. Modify tower tops Some poesibitifies:. Increase base. height Decrease column height Decrease column scale Simplify column details __ Consider darker color for trellis Modify tower base by adding wall extension at second floor level Study corner to increase layering and reduce visual building height Replace°trellis with stronger entry canopy and/or deeply recessed entry portal Building E Winchester Blvd. elevation recommendations Consider extending wall plane to create book end form for roof termination 5. The termination of the tile roof element at the second level roof line on Building E seems awkward at its southern end, The architects will explore alternatives for this condition. One approach that is used elsewhere on the two buildings is shown on the Building E Winchester Blvd. elevation recorrunendations above. That is the forward extension of the adjacent building bay to the south to form a "bookend" to serve as the terminus of the roof element. 6. The southwest corner of Building E is important since it is prominently viewed from the entry drive and drop off area. The concern is that this is the area now where the structure may appear visually the tallest because of the current corner treatment. It is similar in treatment to the corresponding corner of Building D, but is one story taller, and the curved corner element is slightly lower. The architects will study this area further. It should be noted that the architects' preliminary thinking is that some additional redwood trees would be planted in this area, and they would, in time, buffer and mitigate the visual height of this corner. 7. In looking at other examples with the architects, we concluded that the top floor trellises might blend in better with the building, and perhaps mitigate the apparent visual height of the building, if they were a darker color - perhaps more in the color family of the roof. They will explore this issue. CANNON DESIGN GROUP 180 HARBOR DRIVE . SUITE 219. SAUSALITO . CA 94965 Albright Nefflb Corporate Campus Design Review Comments August 15, 2011 P ige 6 8. Most of the elements discussed above apply to the other elevations of both buildings. There is one additional is- sue on the east, open space side of the buildings. In a few locations, outside corners of building forms where the walls turn at ninety degrees and return to the building forms behind, are treated in a manner substantially different from the corners elsewhere on the two structures. They are treated as an outer wall separated from the wall behind by a lighter wall (i.e., without the stucco wall with punched window openings). The architectural intent is to add variety, and give the building a bit more of a contemporary feel. That might be an acceptable idea, but I am a bit uncomfortable with the approach. I think it is a reasonable arguable approach, but I would feel more comfortable staying with the treatment of the corners as projecting volumes, rather than floating wall planes. A small diagram at the bottom of the sketch from the interior campus open space is provided below along with a photograph of a similar corner from the existing Netfix building. ' iSee tower base and tower tops recommendations.for Building E / West elevation Corner treatments as wall planes seems awkward Comer treatment as wail planes Sketch view from the campus internal open space Corner treatment as building volume Joel, please let me know if you have any questions, or if there are specific issues of concern that I did not address. Sincerely, CANNON DESIGN GROUP Larry Cannon AICP CANNON DESIGN GROUP 180 HARBOR DRIVE . SUITE 219 . SAUSALITC) . CA 94965 ARBOR RESOURCES professional consulting arborists and tree care August 18, 2011 Joel Paulson Community Development Department Town of Los Gatos 110 East Main Street Los Gatos, CA 95031 RE: NETFLIX ALBRIGHT CAMPUS PHASE 1-Review of Potential Tree Impacts 90-160 Albright Way and 14600 Winchester Boulevard, Los Gatos Architecture and Site Application S-11-051 Dear Joel: You have requested that I review and comment on the potential tree impacts anticipated by implementing the proposed Phase 1 development at the above -referenced site; this phase includes demolition of five commercial buildings, construction of two new office buildings (Buildings D and E) and a detached garage, and landscaping. This letter presents my analysis and recommendations, and considers observations derived during a site visit on 8/12/11, as well as the following documents supplied for my review: [1] the project set of plans, dated 8/2/11; [2] Sheet C4.0, dated 8/10/11; [3] a report by Deborah Ellis, dated 2/18/11; and [4] a report by McClenahan Consulting, dated 7/10/10. POTENTIAL TREE IMPACTS My site observations and review of the project plans identify the following proposed tree disposition: ■ Removals (116 in total): #51, 60-62, 75, 176-183, 190, 191, 246, 250, 252-264, 272-280, 282, 289, 292, 297-320, 322, 352-354, 357-378, 400, 401, 413-416, 419, 420, 422-426, 430, 436-440, 492, 497, 498, and two with no tags at the entrance of the three lane entrance/exit at Winchester Boulevard. p.a. box 25255, san mateo, calrfornia 54402 • emaik: arborresources@comcast.net phone: G50.654,335 l • fax: 650.240.0777 • licensed contractor #796763 Exhibit 6 ARBOR RESOURCES professional consulting arbortsts and tree care August 18, 2011 Netflix Albright Campus Phase 1 page 2 of 4 ■ Impacted at high or severe levels (58 in total): #76, 155, 184-189, 265-267, 284, 321, 323, 325, 355, 356, 402-410, 417, 418, 421, 427-429, 431-435, 447, 449, 450, 452, 463 and 468-476, 490, 491, three (with no tags) at the entrance of the three lane entrance/exit at Winchester Boulevard, and two (possibly one more) street trees that would be affected by the proposed enlargement of the left-hand turn at the road median along Winchester Boulevard (the trunks of these trees in the median are not shown on the plans, only their canopy dimensions). To my understanding, the Planned Development Application (PD-10-005) has been approved, and the environmental review includes the removal of all previously -listed trees. Along the western perimeter, there are 14 trees listed above that would be severely impacted by constructing the proposed parking lot; they include #447, 449, 450, 452, 463 and 468-476. To achieve protection of these trees, the parking lot must be established beyond (east of) the existing planter, and no lateral cuts or soil disturbance can occur inside the planter area (including overexcavation and compaction). One of the above -mentioned 14 trees, #463 (a 28-inch redwood), has roots growing within a planter island that is proposed for demolition, and a curb cut made for the future parking lot. This planter currently contains tree #282 (to be removed) and an above -ground electrical vault. There is also an existing underground vault at the base of #463's trunk. If this tree is to be protected, the existing planter should be retained, and the underground sections of both vaults kept intact. Should this not be feasible, and a curb cut is necessary, the tree could be subjected to instability and decline. p.o. box 25295, san mateo, california 94402 • email: arborresources@comcast.net phone: 650.654.3351 • fax: 650.240.0777 ■ licensed contractor #796763 ARBOR RESOURCES professional consulting arbor1sts and tree care August 18, 2011 Netflix Albright Campus Phase 1 page 3 of 4 Trees #323 (15-inch cedar) and 325 (19-inch redwood) are anticipated to be severely impacted during excavation for the proposed drive aisle, and consequently, may require removal. If they are to be retained and minimally protected, I recommend the drive aisle is established at least six feet from #323's trunk, and eight feet from #325's trunk. At the northwest section of the site (at the northwest section of the proposed garage), a storm drain line and manhole is proposed for connection within the existing planter containing trees #283, 284, 285, 490 and 491. By implementing the proposed design, the three larger trees (namely #490, 491 and 284) would be severely impacted during trenching. To reduce impacts, I suggest the line and manhole are established at or immediately east of #283, and if needed, #283 be scheduled for removal to allow retention and protection of the other four trees; this redesign would result in the line being angled northeast once it reaches the northwest -most corner of the garage. Trees #417 and 418 are large deodar cedars that appear in overall good condition, and have trunk diameters of 31 and 33 inches, respectively. If they are to be protected, the proposed hardscape, wall, grading and drainage design requires revision to achieve a minimum setback of 15 feet from the trunks for any trenching, grading, overexcavation, and compaction. p.a. box 25295, sari rnatea, calrfornra 04402 ■ email: arborresources@comcast.net phone: 650.654.335 l • fax: G50.240.0777 ■ licensed contractor #796763 ARBOR RESOURCES professional consulting arborrsts and tree care August 18, 2011 Netflix Albright Campus Phase 1 page 4 of 4 RECOMMENDATIONS Should any trees that are identified in this report as being severely impacted but planned for protection, recommendations and setbacks established herein and Ms. Ellis' report should be followed. I also suggest that recommendations contained within Ms. Ellis' report during actual demolition, construction and landscaping be carefully followed and incorporated into the project plans. Also, there are approximately 135 trees identified (either by their trunk locations or canopy dimensions) on the plans but not yet tagged. Their tagging should occur prior to issuance of the building permit, and include the following: #441 thru 560, those along Winchester Boulevard that will be impacted by the road improvements, and two or three trees in the road median immediately adjacent to the proposed left-hand turn lane along Winchester Boulevard. Sincerely, ivy t _ 14.-/ David L. Babby Registered Consulting Arborist® #399 Board -Certified Master Arborist #WE-4001B p.o. box 25295, san mateo, califorma 94402 • email: arborresources©comcast.net phone: 650.654.335 I d fax: G50.240,0777 • licensed contractor #796763 z H cn- w U 0 ) G 0 0 4J q 0 H h ro 0) 0 •0 0) •.i 0 3 N "m ro 0) U 0) 0 0) 0) 0 ro 00 8 0) '0) 0 3 U ,o ag. •.4 0 0 al o b ro .0 0) 4-)In a 0 aa)) n a would you like a) O U 0 4.4 O a) U H 0 O 0) ro 0) SC H 4-) 4) m z ro U N .4 ) •H rn r1 O W 4.4 H 0) to my husband. 0 a) y N h 0) 0 O 0) 0 O 0 ro U 0 FIC • ai h H U >r a) 0) • 0) H 0) 3 COMMISSIONER BOURGEOIS: Madam Chair? 0) 0 0 ocl 0 H 0) 0 0 0) 0 0) O a like to make as well. I had recused myself from the PD 00 3-I 0 0 4d 4) H•H X 4) W 3 0 0 .-0 a) 0 H m ro 0) 0) ro 0 w° H x H �C'. Sd 0 44 H .-OI 0 q m H 0) 0 LH A 4 o ai +) 0 • w° o .-4 0 ro > 3 �+ 0 tn iL 0 0 ro 3 H the issue, so I'm going to participate. CHAIR SAYOC: 0) -0 O b� N 34 o a4-) o O H 5 0) W 00 0) o 4-) U .a1 En H i H H o N o cn ?1 fat •.-I E k let vOi m 0 0 H 0) U k U >, a 3 0) H H U H m q 0 4) 0) U 0 00 a) 0 u M •.-I ro v Yes, I would like to say that I have reviewed the file, so I am prepared to 1() l0 1^ CO 01 0 .i N d' N l0 00 01 0 .-I N M .0 Lrl m W U z a W' W a a a) H N 00 m U• 0))H 4 W 0 .0 co H H C1n ro H o ro H CA r a• U N O q N H Pi a • Cr) \ H. O0)q- Hc—ti agqa)p) a) ,[ arl m3 oH.0 Hrt q 'i o H Oo h F al h 3 Fi 5� uHi ° H H E 0 u ro 0 z+p H 'gb, Gi IHI 0 .rot FI 0 N A OE Cg7H 0) 0 O 0) o N I 0 a , (5•O OH q40) N W H b 3 40 Llq H E 0) 4-) H H r1 N t7 v u) l9 h CO 01 O ti N h) c 1n 03 r 00 01 0 r-1 N C) V' 1n N N N N N N Attachment 4 w N 41 HI k 0 . a 0 .0 w w •.1 0 w A 10 H v w 0 w Aa, rn N W N '0 4w H .0 d '0 ro 1, 0 0 0 0 {1 3 C °m ro 3 0 m 0 ai 0 FI H $ 'U 11 'O w 0) w � b9:1 . x H 0 aa)i. 01 H ro A 4" H 0 a CH 0 w � 0 w architecture and materials will be used for the office those indicated in the plans buildings e Liar to the w A m ro m 44 0 0 0 ro w 1-' IJ existing Netflix building just north of the site. There was another direction that doesn't apply, 0 w w 5, ioL 44 toy D v w at w 0 3 En O o m w aH o w H 0 0 to 4 0 .i .0 A u RI 0 , 1-1 � .1 H 0 rn a, 4-4, C 0 A H and Site Applications for the project shall be reviewed by C o A '0ri A C 0 v m ro 00 m ro ro w +' u C a) w 0 'El A ro 0, +�1 m 0 ro m 4 0 o w 0 44 3 w o 3 4°1 A '1 .0 d 10 1-' 3 HI 0 0 u` �3.10"N 0 H 3 -,1 En 0 0 0 4. b U w 0-, o. 0 o v E. 0 •4 3 ro , 0 En 44 y°1 '1. a 0 44 1 4-1 Based on that action and direction the Applicant submitted an_application to process the first phase of the 3 w C w a) O 14-1 001 w ro 0 o —I 0 H 44 ,H 0 3 4-1m •.I w �w ro 5 N 0 N C .) 0 0 CO0, C 41 w o °u 3 3 t� a.)) 0H H 0) 0 +1 0 � : :ModH (03 o 0 w° HHI 41 w +1 .41 0 yw 'b D m o OH o o 3 0 •0(-5n •ri Enrn O .0 .I 0 a w C +* o 0 u w •.1 w H v o -.-1• 'i N Cr) P „1 r W 01 0 8-4 ..1 N-1 m - ,4 N .ri '-1 N NNNN N N w 'U ro H A 0 ro 0 m 0 0 u, m U participate in the b1 o w ° H 4 • i I w° A 0 0 rn A A 3 0 to En Ea 0 040 w 0 .i A 0 0 ' -1 -1-4HI .x u w D 0 H 0 w 1a 0 }1 H 0 5 0 0) o 0, 0 oF.,m '0 E �n 0 C o 0 Ia My 0 0 N h HI -°I p '0.0N a)aa). 4 H 0 3 U u So we are now at Item #2. It is located at Albright Way and 14600 Winchester Boulevard. We have Site Application S-11-051. Mr. Paulson, 0 ro w 5, 1-) U w 0 U 3 you are providing tonight's Staff Report? ul ro 3 0 0 • ro of o H 0 '0 0 a0 44 ..-1 Pi 0 0 ro '0 A - A 0 H 4-41 41 0 0 0 H .f5.'. 0 ,. H A'i N o as • 00 x A 0 H°I O 1.10 0 +1 H 4 r1 a14-1U w 1.1 w N •.I 0 4.) 00 1-1 4R, w C C C A m 0 A 4-1 C H 0 3 m v , 44� 44 0 0��{{ 4.) G ,1 0U H 0 0 •r°I 4-) U r4 P H 0 1.1 m ca 0 w 4 cn aa)i ' g ro 0 4-) 4-) H 0 m 4-4C 0 1 IH 4-)4-40 0 w u 0 a ° rd 0, a) uv 0C , 0 4 Ill H 4 N 0 ro -1 XI 3 H, C o ,I N w +1 w +-1 '4 w d1 0 •0 0 ,, h D 'd to co H N +OoN 0, N , . 0 0 At 04 a, ".{{ m.c 01 g O F, H .-I ro , ro u 0 co "- in '0 ° .4 a)O _ 44 0 U .0- w •.i 41 0) 0 C7 z N 00 L1' 0 O b H u ,-1 0 ° 0 04 w_a m UU 0 ..i '.4 0 HO •,44 0) 0 A 0 0 •.I c� O b, 'CI qwq m , a q .0 '4 'Cu1 ..0{ A 0 '0 0. W y .-4 k01. H o 0, .o VI •.H M N m a „1 )0 r CO Ol N m a ,n l0 1` N m o rt N m sir ,n r-, ,-, r, ti r, ri r-1 N N N N N N to the Council. That concludes Staff's report and Staff is 0 ..4 4-) 00 • t, 0 0 ro HI rt H O. u) �. H 0 0 a �i x GI 4 .0 41 1 Wo 0 ate0 q) H 3 Et)Q CO m alH 0 - H 0 g w 00U 0 0 HI 0) '1} 0) NN 0 CHI •rl •r{ fri b U either of Mr. Paulson or Ms. Propp. It's important to me at least that I understand our role this evening, because it applications and I just want to be clear on that. But in particular what you said is consistent with page three of the Staff Report that said, "The Architecture and Site official development plan, including architectural drawings +) N 0 R4 0 ro 6) 0 3 H m 0 4 +A) U 0 4-)3 7 $ )4 0 a) U � 'o N 0 .0 N 0 ro H .� byp 0 0 0 o 4-) 40 O U U 0) a) 0 N al 4 al v 0 a 0 44 0 AN A a) 3 N 3 0 ro ;� U O A }',) a) .a , a) '0 aA 3 aa)) D a o v 0 4.) 0 b1 .0 R� v '1 '0 a 44-1�3 N 4 3 +o) 41 +) a-1 >, 0 N 0 W 0 N the Council has already approved, could we vary that? So it a) o 0) 0 o o N 4 A 4-) H N O 0 0) ;.) }) N (T 4 x tn O • 0 '0 °° 3 4 (0 z 3 0) H N N H'cn 0 0 E W No O U 0 3 0 Ch W H W o 3 o a) 4--)EE C) al 1 -P -I 9- 1.0 .-I N 0) P u1 l0 1., CO CO O * N CO C N ti !` CO 0) 0 .-1 N 0) C N 0i NNN NNN Winchester to the site, and it will also include the }) 0 O a) N ro W .4' rn 0 A )1 4-1 .� k v a) W 0 14 W W 0 0 O a) '0 4-4 Staff has looked at the previous plans that were proposed plans that are before you tonight are in Council's direction. As a result Staff recommends that the application be forwarded to the Council with the the steps for that are outlined in the Staff Report. Based on the Town Council direction Staff O 4-) 0 4--)0 0 o H W o 4 all W N t. P H )4 a) a) a ' H 0 0) 0 4 +0 ) O 0 U a) 0 0 3 U ro x � a a-)>, ) 0 A a � 0 •.-I 3 0 o 5 u 0 •.4 0 9H a) o 0) o 0) as N N W items are generally the proposed materials. We have a clearer definition of materials and colors, which were provided with this item, the proposed landscape plantings er of plants that are proposed to be planted as part of the Phase One, and also the proposed new signalized intersection, which rl 0 0 0 u v H ro a N a) .0 o q 0o ro 14 ¢3 o 0 • 11 a ro 4-) a a) a) u m W 0 4J a0) 0 44 ro a, •roi m 0 a 0 .-1 4) al 0) N 3 U LOS GATOS PL 0) 04 N M a N m r m 0) 0 ri Ni (0 C ti ti CO 0) 0 .1 N 1''1 C N NNNNN N a) u w a) 4-4 ro 4. q a) a) H N a3i 0 a) The third one was b m 0 ro H a a) w 0 N H O a) N ro (0 ro O a) q ro H P, -1 a) N A w 0 a, 4a ro a A 3 proposed project they're going to have to provide a signalized intersection at Winchester for their ultimate entry. It has a temporary entry on their property, 0 0 U 0 a) 0 '0 a) N 4 H ro 4) P, 0 m x 0 0 4.4 .� U w u v 4 a) u a) a) 4-1 w 0 u 0 ro m 41 a) 0 .4 0 0 al 0 0 0 N 3 H -) 4-) 4-7 .� 4 a-) Atn 34 0 A 0 A 4J 4-) 4-1 J 0 N u •I '0u 4 0 o 0 o 0, U tn o : pro H el O .41 44 a 0 al a) 0 ,A u 4) •,-{ 4) a) o H 14 1 h .0 w° U) H Cl 0 °a •°+ o • •- a 44) 0 H 4 4-) o O P O >, u w N o 0 10 a P+ going to be JD very clearly and directly. U fv. N P o 0 P, b) H0 q 0 4) H o H N CO C rz 0 C1 P q 0 .4 N Ni 0 COMMISSIONER O'DONNELL: just want to clarify that I understand. So basically tonight, because of the decision v 0 ro N 4� O H 0 U 0 4-) ts 0 .4 x O 0 H a) u 0) 3 ri 0 0 0 '0 41 3 m x to look at. the aspects, those can be provided as part of your ro 0 H 41 H 0 o N 0 U N o CO O H c co H '- H'� E 0 ,, 3 z+) 14 a1 O c, E t7 N o O a , aJ H 00 .-, N M P „1 r m m O N. M d' N r m O1 O rl N M C N N N N So I understand that the location of the • (1) 0 0 G N 4a '0 m a) •,-1 o A 0 .0 u 4.) o 3 0 0 o 0 I N a) .4 '0 a, ro +) 4-) 4-) o q to q 0 HI N H N 0) •1U a) N PI q .11 v a) a) 3 4.4 0 u a) •d 0 +) N x a) HI HI 1-1 q 0 0 U A J) N We're not discussing any of those things, and in fact we q 0 O 3 go q o a) "I q N u 0 41 N H a) .I .41 4 q 4-) o0 o q FC 0 ro 0 ro Il 4-7A N i 0 N u 0 4 ro 0 4.4 A 0 O 4) 0 q H a) 0 o 0 .°q H ro w N 0 a) q 0 +) 'q 0 b a) tea u 0 ft 0 q roro u H ro a) u ro ro N q 0 U 0 0 u w conditions that you propose this evening, all of the P ro a) >, P, as 4) a) 0 a) A w 0 a) '0 : 3 u m 4 o o as a) u) 00 a) a) N 0 0 O •.-i O H HI H , 14 a)A y P H O a) O a) a) N a) q o J-' H a) 3 H 0 a A N N 0 a) 0, a 4) 0'0 4.) w U • o I UH00am° o ) 0 I 0 / ro N 0 •°-I b N .0q N ro H O' rri AR, a -1-) 4-7 14 � a 4i ca a)H `b 0 al al A '0 N u 0 ro q +) u 4 o v • A 0 a) C7 w rs a) 3 u H P 4J N a) 0 0 H a-) 0 0 •'i 0 k 4 u �qq 0 3 a) 0 u 'u k-) U ro 4-4 0 7 N o b •.) .0 0 a) a) .P 2 ro N 0 .q a A N•rql .4 A t0f1 •rNi '0 N 44 •00 0 Fro.' m F4' '0 ID o el m ro P 4 �� A +) - +) 0 a o 00 A 0 w q 4 H 4.) a H 0 0 0 Na) a) .H ro ) o N Jr a N 4.) ro N N H O (1-1 '0 3 0 W a .0 0 ,--1 0 a 0 rn O ro O N . h .0 0'0 0A H 0 N 04 a q H N +) ro •,-1 (a H i '00 3 N roi ro U H 0 0 0 3 4' N el 0 q N r` N M v' ,)1 10 r CO m O , N M C N m r m O1 o r, N M C ul 1-1 .-, '-, N N N N N 0) v •H N N U a +-) 'W O a, o oa) 3 a) >r N 0) U 4-, 4 H • 0) 0 0 0 3 U 4 m sd• H v 0 o 4 -1 0 0 •d H 4.) r4 4 4.) ro 0 Ho 0 i N aa)) 4 Q a +'a) a) 0 0 3 3 N ; N .4 ro a +° .2 N 0 4-) a '05 '0 N Si a '0 N O U A i1 0) � .-4 ro q 4 )) • H •0 N O Ate.) �r •H O .R O 3 ) 0) '0 0 0) •ai u 0 44 T/ H w° o m 1) A a b) a) N N ,a a) 0 3 44 >r a) +) 0) . 0.HNN .'0 .- u) N +H N4a 01 H a) 0 a) a 'O N a U 0CO a b) ,Q -4 0 1-1 4.4 W N U H 1�) ral H co 4-1 v O H CD 0) 01 • 0) 'CS H a) •r1 N 0'0 4-1 : o w � 3 , ni (Wi 41 w 0 0 0 m H 0 01 w N c°) 01 a 0 0i -H 0 0) A ' 3 ( A 0) 0 H a a 'H }) +, N 0) • N 0 O a) f 7 O 3 0 .• 0 '0 0 4 H m w 2 OH N N 011 ,04 4-) N 0 N 0 0 N H 0 0 5 0 0 3 a�) +a.) txi (1) 0 0 N .0 E• N .0 44 D aJ '00 0 0 '� +-) H C 4-)a) 0 a H .1-I a) .0 +) U . • 0 H .W1 N. . .4 +) CD 44 HI 0 p 4 4: 04 ..4 •H .4 0 .4" H a0 a)) o .O •,W-1 •4 id A 3 N U 4-) ro H 0 U 3 rl N M P u) l0 N m 01 0 ei consulting architect's recommendations, would those be in the plans to go to ro x H 0 W .H 4 H 0 .•-1 41 ro 4-) 4-) N H 4 N 4-) 0 a 4 H a ro U H a (.1 m ,o-1 N 03 • 0) 0 ri N f'1 C 1l1 N N N N N N whether they're planning to do an interim modification 4 0 >1 O04 a a 0 0 at 3 ? 4-) ° U 3 QI ro H (0 4 o 0 N m 0 H N 4 0 o• o C 5 N N H W have been decided on August 1st, but those would bec O 4) 0 ti .P H u m 0 W • CO ›.1 H A H H 4 H 0 N •.1 0 a N o N .H +) ro N U E U H M 5 +) x H 0 H U a) 3 q• 00 W 4 • a) O o N U 0. U A 4 ,04 mi 0) H N a 0 4.) . 0 O Q o H H 0 H a) p . o N •H N H NA H N F44 •4 U U E 0 U• N 11! 34 w O W o N •r{ N a) 0 0' U say, Madam Chair, that we also can talk about the entrance. .Ci W 0 0 0 0) U rn a .ri H 4 N 0 4 U ro x H• .0 E w 4 a O y`.'.) N N O N T 3 a) N o 4 0 c 2011 had pretty si letter of August 15, q ro H a a) 4.4 .H N 0) N N 0) H ro }) ro 4-) N a 0 U w 0 N N 0 ro x N a) 0 +) buildings, specifically building height, and some H W a) as 0 4 H a) o 5 o 0 4 a 0) N ..4 d 4 (1) '4 ro N H a 'O (I) O U N Ho 4.) 0 ro CD 0 N 0) a •.i 0) N U 0) 4 41 m "4 3 a) I N O O O i a 0 H� a) •°U ro P N H H 3 o H o E a w m O N a! N b U z H 4-1 H +) 4) b O 0 N .q ° RI H p p 421 H U N a' O a N N E CO •4 4.) Ch pp N a N y�0"1 0 °� 'roU' 4 44 .4i J. N 0 ro 4, 4 010 4) 4-) a) H H it a H � (0 4 ri N m O. U) l0 N 0) 01 o ,0 N M .(i an b t` 01 0 N m m N '� el r1 elel - - ' 1 N N N N N N 0 a) 0 ro 4-) w 0 ° .411 0' a) ro o u C �v o 41 C >4 C 0 rti b U A a) + 3 C ro 0 40 2f 0 • g 41 0 U >+ o b 0. H 4J 0 0 }) N ro ro 3 0 3 N a � o m m °HI w °m O N +) ro 40 0g) U ,C Si W 0' x Cn b) .0 C al N E U x N '°O ' 3 w° H a aa)i a 4 4a° m A m IT) owA +) Cn 4-4 a) aas A zNH0 A oDrN H.i >, Q 0 z P ° DI 04 N 4a)DP.q 4-I. .r{. o )) A 4.) 0 ro ro co w W •ri o' 0 k C) ro W U0 H U 4 St 0 O N N ,N-7 a) ro 04 0 S+ 4 u 0 rn H 0 0 'J 4-) 0) m rn o ro ro a) U) U) A H 40 0 O 0 a) x A cn r0 C a 3 .41 .4 0, cn ro x 4a m H C q0 4.) N ,a H rya, a) ro ro HI U 0 i m 0 U 0) h ° 0 41 4 co H C a) H 4W 4-)H ri tn co ,I •Ni 0 ,-roi N tea) U C C o iL 0 (3i 41 ro ri H W N a+ ro I a P. '0 ai 4, 0 N N 0 0 N 3 m0 C I will do so. Thank you very much. I apologize for that. U c 0 co • to a) HI o o o 4-I C7 0 ,ro4' S, 0 x o .44 A E ro z w W ro N 44 o ° )4 ro 0 ro CHAIR SAYOC: ssion. Happy to be here to present the A&S Application for the two office buildings, landscaping, and some of the details a) a) 0 RS N 00 o m v U HI N 0) 4A d, U N Hal CDCO 0 P, po a) ..0 co H � cn V' .) 3 H H -P C>4 N 0 H $i a ,0 •n •H P, o, , O ai -'4 P, 0 of � U , O 0 •3 a) 0O 14I u o 0) 4# rn ro VI 0 HI 0 Ps x 0 'U H 05 Oa 0 .0 N ri ri N M V' ul r m al O ri N CO V N r CO 01 O .-I N M v' LO H ri r{ r{ 1-, r, H H H rl N N N N N N 4-1 0 • -1 0 a° u°) fi w° 0) u ro 0 N U .41 0i 4 0 -44 3 41 0 0 H H RS o o m 0 41 D m U a) 0 41 0 0 ro -HI 0 44 o o o A 0, know if all of them have those refinements, but I don't a) a) .0 ro I 0 +) -14 zi .0 0 u •ri 0 m A 3 u N +° 01 01 HI 0 HI O >4 O U 4.)) N N +1 C00",'. .0 4 ?S � N •rii 0) '(1 O 0 0 N 0 D 0 4a H+) °0 N o Q A-' N '0 1) H 14 A C.0Ni 3 a)q .3 o 4-) 44 ai • -4 a) al oP ro a) .4 > 3 A N o 0) +A) 4C 0 0 o'. 1-I W .ri 4l .-I o a) m 0 C 4-1 0) 0ff. F. WW a) .4'' O 1 a) O -.4 Z0 S.' a) S) •n 00 )4 �-]. U Q b 4a A 0 1�-1 0 C 0 .0 H A a) H z 0 2 •HI o ro 'O o '00 H •rl. O ?+ O S a) 4) •HI 41 +) 41 0Hn (fin co 0 4 co )4 l) ,r0 a 0 a) N C) CO H (1) f-I 0 a) N 0 � 0 •i 4-) 1 riU N4-)G. s0i) 0 U 0 a1 NH 4-I 4 •Hi' • '0 0 0 01 0 A-) -P H HI . • 0 0 - .j 4. N__ 0 4'�-) ,k. N A o a 07 0 HH I C.)°i o 0 °) drawings that would show us? should have clarified that for you either in the Staff HI 4) H: 0 a) C 0 � 'Cv aa)) D q0q 3 40 b 41 a) H H (f) b HI O N w -) 0, �4 V N H N U 0 .0-1C 0 0 P W 3 z aNi 0 m o 0 H cn 4) HI a) a) p w O ° '0 O a) 44 U iRS RS 0) z U 0 ¢ 4.1 H fi o 4 4')) 4.) r_ia D Z 0 ft W O O P, 0 00l ri HHI p al � o u o a •rf 0 4-) N ° o) 0 te a0) 0 N u HI w4-1 O. O- . .. y+ .,.{ _ H a •rro 200 ,-I N M c N N CO 0 0 �. M i ri rf '4 r.4 m N N N N N N signalized intersection that would come in opposite V) u a) a) HI >3 tn 4 0) a) co q3p •rl $4 E 0 U .4 4) H $4 " N a 0 4. 0 4 .4 0 i) •3 b) w 0 3 aN) 0 0 o' Hu en o4-) 0 $ '0 ro u q 0 3 •,-1 m cn u 0, .4 4 ro o o N w u a) R 0 4-) cf) u 0 4-) A 4 •rl co ro 44 003 000 'O }A) 4-) + ) 00 Z71 u o 0 a) �C1 U 0 '0 •rl right now, which is currently landscape, parking, and what have you, would all become landscaping, so there would be a Winchester. The site is ringed by mature redwood trees, oaks, cedars and what have you, so that's going to become the theme of our project: we're going to pull the redwood trees into the project wherever we have the outside poking in, but then the center of the project, which is full of just beautiful trees will be kept and it 4 ro X 0 0 a) u +) ra will be a park -like setting in the center. So it will be .0 w U 0 n Si 04 , -0) U o 0 •0 0 N a) U b J-' a) a) o w 0 • w 104) 0 '0 .0 k w 4-) 0 tiL ro 4 N u w w °o 4-) TS the project. This is how people would perceive the project a) P. w 4 ao � 4 4 4-) HNH N 0 N w >,tu o cT 4 O CO {, 0 a) co 0 Oo 4 w m o •d ''r O l H H 0 E W 0 •N+ u U m N A 0) Hz 'N E •Ni E b) rn cs4a u '0 a ✓T H N H •r1 O 0 HI A 0 H 0 N cn T a) 0 0 u a.) a W 4 a) w ° 4-1 4.) 4H ) CD 3 E H rl N m C 0) (0 r co 01 0 ri N (•1V. 0) l0 r 0 01 0 r1 N (•1 P 0) '-, .i rl "'� .-I rl r, rl rl r, N N N N N N We have addressed the goals outlined all of this area � 20 'O 0 0 b 0 N l a) C.)4-3+ 4-)3 a) a) A >, 4A.) •,a H N 0 a) U a) o .4 ro 0) a) a, o a) w 3 4 •,4i w C .4 0 L) 4, 4 a-) 4 N 4, 0 0 ri l) 0) 4 '0 0 ,4 aJ N 4 E N w .r, 0 b) U a) O 0 N ro ro l v) a) ro a) of4 It0.al 00 4-1 N 0, ) ow 0 l4/) 0 .0 •N N •rpl N ro a) • 0 0 N b H 0) 0) 1) U to 04 '0 0 4 4 0 0 •rgCql N H u 4 }) 4 Hi N 0 -4 0 •4i 4 N 0 >1 04 A .4 ro A A o a) H +a)a)) ro a) 17 ro ro U +) 4 4 W a) q •rt ) qgQ ro 0) ai •Ni 'A 44 a) b '0 N 0 N O 0 '0 'O N.{{ +A) +) U 0 �' O N 0 E or a) '0 '0 ,4 U 4 •r1 H ro al 4-) a) a) co $4 H •• o Jam-) f°) N N co O N �4 k H al H U W '0 R1 ro a) '0 w zz 0 9 m 44 oA N 5 D, a) w a m A z •0 °u -) a) al H 4 .4 .4 a) 1) H 0 w m 0 03 4 ro •. '0 .0 a°iCD H o :4 .r1 0 3 u +°) 0) N N 0 PO a u 3 .4 0 4 a) .y oN u w a) R.,U co a-) a) O .4 ¢, 0r-1 4 0, w u .4 4 0 x u 4-) v 0 +) at 0 ro 0i .ro PIw a, 0 CO rcl w N u a 3 •0 4 ° N ' ° 0 4-4N N 4.)) H �r a) Ga 4 4 a) 0 q 0 14a a) JO-) ,�-I Fes', +A) 0 0) ,-ro H m 0) 3 0 3 0 +) 4 project architect There is only a little bit of time, so I would be prepared to sort show you how the project works. I'll go through the )1 3 N m 0 }) 4 A v A a0 H 4 0 4 a) .0 0 4 ro H x U al0 4-I •rl N a) N N 4. 1 P m But just to orient you, of course here's Winchester on the top, on the west side the Creek Trail. There's about 16' of fall across the site. Of course co H a) 0 a) q c4 H u a) H al 4-) N N \ N O LH N U \0 a) zo O 00 H 0) a) N H H a) E w 00 0 try z+) H z .4 Z •b1 E a H a ai 0 u o 71 0 o rn a In N 0) ›.1 4 .4 H x N m c' 0) 10 r 0 0) 0 0) .Ni 0) C (0 10 r 00 01 0 .-, N 0) 0) r, rl r, .1 rI N N N N N N 4-) 0 $ U N H 0) Hi a •0 HI 0 A ?1 0 a H 0 0 0 • 4-) o H 4i a) N 4 +4) 4) HI CO A o 0 0 x H H 4) U1 a) U .4" .4 4-) 4.) into the project and park in this garage, shoot across into sits on the back side of the project looking out toward the N 0 0 U .0 0) w H 5 o C o o A '00 E � U N 44 RI0 m a al H 4 U 4 ro $4 H ro a I like pictures. ROBERT GIANNINI: Actually I had a lot to say about each picture, but that's all the pictures. Hold on and let's see if there are 4.) 0 $ 0H '0 a ro 4) .4 As H $4 ,3 f44 O HI a) ›, 4.) a) 4 ro b 0 E ro a. ) f 4-) 0 a H 4 • zw O 0 0 ) 4) 0 -00 (4 a a) g N H 4)) t a H N(ti 0 ro fa cn. 4 ftl 0 O 3 0 U 0 U 4) 4.) 4.) 0) 4 4 aa)i .0I 3i 3 0/ H 4.) 0 ro 4 O ro 3 ro '0 h but you just got started, you that presentation. materials I know is a part of the project. There aren't a lot of materials on the project. H( N M c 1(1 V) N CO 01 0 HI N 1`l C I() LLD h CO 01 O H1 N f+) V' N H N H1 H .i HI Hi , H( HI N N N N N N 4 a) HI .4 4) ro : 0 W U a) 0) O .)4.) O w0 0 .0 4) 4) 44) 4). u° 0 0 0 fa t b N .4 N 0 a 0 -0) 4 H1 14 U N N 0 N N .a) H o w a z • 0 0Pi 4-,a) N 0 44 0 W 0 -(4 N ro HI .1.) N 0 0 N Om A ro 44 H0 00 1 a) a) .4" N H H '0 ,4 a H RI • 0 v 4 3 b o H 4.) 4) a) H 4) 4J t.0 4) ro 11, N 0 3 a) '0 u) HI -P N 4.) N ) .N 4.4 HIH 0 0 0 0) • >I a) a) 0 0 H H •n 4) .r -0) - 0 a) w a v. ) a entry. So people come in, they park in the little redwood grove, this is all visitors parking in the front, and they come to this point. This stair tower and the other stair the activity of all the major circulation in the project ') (4 ..4rd --)a) 3 w � J0) N H k' N (n rt) 0 0) 1-1 •Nl ro 4 )4 4) ) /0) A .4 U t) 'o3 A 0 0 0 • A 4) H 0 H n 0 3 H H0) 3 a : 3 N HI d-) a) 0 A A A ri 0 HI 44) 1)4 CD u 0 4-I Is HI m 4 'U H 0 .4 • O a) 0 1� Ti 0) .A 1-1 03 0 -(4 y3ro�, 4-1 44 0 ON) N (4 0 4.) 0 0 N 0) H 0/ a) v 4 i 4) ✓T .$.1 0 )01 0 H0 HI rHl 0) 3 •HH a) 0 4a 4 O b H H 4 A 4-) E. E 4.) something that will along with all the existing trees give instant character to the project. You can see in this style of architecture the you can create with balconies and terraces •n think I'll H 4 0 a ro A 4) 0 0 HI m 0 zi A 3 4) ro 6) I 0) 0 0, N (I) 4 21 4) ro 4 m let'you look at pictures, but this is the Hf N (•) c ul (0 1) co 0) O Hi N (/ c Vl (D 1) W 0) O Hi N (") c to ri Hi ri Hi ri .i HI H1 .i HNNNOINN until future phases and they would have the option of entering the garage on this side. 0 0 0 0 •4) H b) a) 0 N 14 a4-) a) N 0) 0 u w 0 in a) a) 0 0 ro 0) " 0 o a) p. +- 4) O +4-1 °) O 3 4-) 0 a) 4) x U N m the buildings, so we shifted some of the site elements that we had so that we can have a direct access from this side from this end of the garage you can either take a path through the campus green and get up to the terrace or you can go right onto the terrace. The idea there is to create 4) 0) 4-1 0) ro -) +p 4 4) 'd +0) + ) 1 3 D 0) r0 0 O A 0 0 0) \ •r1 :, a) 0 4-) •4-1 0 '0 +) p i D 0 '-4 0 � 0 a) 0 0 a 0, a ro U P 0 •�r1 m ro 0) cn o 4 o q ° •,-1 ro O 'Hi 4w-I N +) ro 0 LI 4) : 4-3 •'0i 00 0 ro +) a) H w RS ro 0 CL •ri •r1 0 0) 0 t)) H option for people to interact as they're heading from their 0 4-4 +) x 4-1 O 0 4-) .� rcl U ro d ro 0' ro ai w w ro o a .4) w a) 0 4-) .4 0 a 0 U area outside the cafe would be. Actually it would be much more populated than that. I'il come back to this, but other W 0 r-1 ri D 0 0 w O 0 x •rN4 0 ro 0 en N v a) b a) a) N U activity that happens in those spaces and you can see how ) 0 A 0 0 O • a) .H C. .H a) U ro 0) a) 0 0 0 0 a) 11 0 a) R) O ro l will be a little bit more of this kind of character with N n') P 0) t0 N Co 0) 0 .01 0) C 0) l0 ti co 0) o H N m C 0) H H H H H H N N N N N N The board you have behind you show the two colors of plaster. It would be an ocher plaster pretty close to the existing Netflix color, perhaps just a little bit 0 a) $4 ey w 4-) x 3 H) w 0 0 U u b to 0 .rl 0 a) a) richer and a lighter color up through architect; we met with him twice and worked through several details and I details. Some of the things he suggested was lightening up some of these trellis elements that happen on the top, a) N d +) a) 0 +� +)) a m m 3 It 0) '°d to ..-1 0 )-I 0 a) X 'dd H ro +) 0 A 0) 0 0 ri '0 O '- Si al A 44 � +) 2 0) m 0) 0 q a)ai w U 0 ro +) a) 0 j, •ro121 a) ro 0) O 4-, •0 3 •rl 4-1 +-) 0 RIO 3 0 •rl 'J H a) ro ts s 0 a) `ai •ri H-1 a) x ro w N U ro 0 0) 0 of it up there and I also have a sample of it here. It's five spots on the project and on site walls. This project actually describes kind of how people would circulate through the site. Once people enter the site employees would have the option of going along Winchester to the parking garage. In this phase all employees would park in the garage up against Highway 85. They'd also have the option of dropping down through the a) 0 0 •rl q a) H H 0 rI •3 o a) 3 d cr N p z V 0 O o 'CI � ,°)i H H o A O tn •U H co z k 4 N a) a A a ro ro OH o r4 a)0 H 0 0 rn Ha a , N 'd 0# 0 °u a) u R. H 0 0 ri H N )+) C 0) l0 l) co 0) O H N 0) m 0) )O r co 0) O H N 0) C 0) H H H H e-1 H H H H H N N N N N N .0 0 •r 4) a) H m a) N 3 4) A • 0 a) 4a)l bn H N (0 4i v H 4)) °w 0 CD d 0 01 d FC PO o .U4' 0 u) 2 +) o _ U0_ H 4-)N >4 0 0 0 4) U) 3-I U) N ,L) 4) 0 H w ra 0 H ,O U) o a) o (4 q 0) u U ro 0 b N o ro o a) a U here. These are all existing cedars. So there's really Thank you for that presentation. I'd actually like to back up just a little H A 0) H ro .4 O 0 0 w 0 4) 4-1 tn 0) ro 3 O O • think to put these details in context I'd like a little bit 0 0) 3 g ro N H 4 (0 N N o ri 4-1 )+ 0 ' •ri 4 '0 A N > o n 4--) 0 4.) ,c' 4-4 w o .. VI cf)ro 0 g U U •C 0 'O 0 N HI 4-) N N 4 o '4)roo 0 ° a) •� U H a) 0 a w o a) N f-I () 4.) A + .4 •'4 p 0 going to allow buildings of this height in town then that building needs to be something pretty darned special. I N A O 1 ro ro m 0 U '0 .4" 3 A • k a) •� HI � W 0 z .A 0 +) •HI 3 w U .fi a..) a.) 0 0 N 0 00 o x H H 3 44 that style work at this scale? This is going to be a very '0 4 ro w (11 0 4 0 ni H 0 ro en your design philosophy behind why this is the right style and right orientation for this site for this project. This is coming out a little V) .-I O p 0 (1) HH u) to H ar-i a)) E W A O b 4) o 04 H4-) H H A S-I 04 0 a u (H)j a) O O •) F4 H C7 a a CO2 0 (I) O a , + a .) o 0 41 4-)N H N to rl N CO a N l0 f� CO 01 O ri N M d' N l0 1- CO 01 O rl N CO C u1 rl .-1 ri HI rl rl H-1 rl CAN NNN N the' oak trees, the stone, pavers, and long tables that would project out into that cafe space. In the center of some trees with color like these Jacarandas and Pistache or to add a little bit of color to what's already there. In the.campus green the character of the spaces (1 a 4) ro 4 N q 3 0 0 .L) a o 0) N N ro 0 Hk I" ?i 0 G o 0 A o v 0) 0 )-I N 4 H H a) 0) 4 x ro +) 3 x N 0 4 0 +)rd ro N N 0 00o 4 A G 1-1 H i) zf .s4 3 0 3 4) 4 Then this image shows the extent of the o 3 � it a) ro •� U) U ro • 34 A ro ro 0 of o w v H 0 W ro m A a A 0 a) I 8 d3 to 0 0 0 0 '0 0 0 0 0 °u a .0) A. o I A H 3' to the green. The idea would be to put oversized pots, things like that, so people can sit on the,steps. If it was the lawn will be those small kind of gathering spaces that +) a) ro g a) d � N 34 A 4 0 ai q + )a d 4.-)A, U H o A •r1 ro 41 RIN 0 '.4 N +')) 'CIU N ro a) 0 .4 3 0° 04 4 4) A aa) o 0 a) 3 to o )-I 4-) 41 Tr Si 0H ri 0w a) 0) •J�) E' W 0 CD a) ro '0 ni k m A o 0) U W C7 • z CO co 0 0) C H a) 0 b+-) tr q m0 4.)) , 1 4(0 (0 (0 W A a) O I 4) H aa) m o H W • O N to 4) 'O 0 H-I 0 0 0 4)) N 0 14 - m a , N 5%' 0 RI N 0 N v w w 4# 0 A 3 A H N 4) p b _ HIH 4 a) r-I 3 3 3 m 3, ri rl N CO C u1 10 r CO 01 O rt rNi m a ti l0 rri Ol 01 0 rl N CO C if1 H) ri rV r1 ri ri rt NNNNNN .0 ' 4-) u 4-3 .-I j qq 4 0 'O a) o U 4 H 0 0 3 .° U H 0 H4 0 °›, RI 0 )o w 0 04 o a) m ..1 ,y a) 010 o, a) 0 O 1.1 O U A •G-I A 3 0 ro 0) 0 N -,-1A 4 ro +) 0 4Ha 0) POI X H +) •.1 4 •.1 4.0 tea) a) to a, Z O .0 o ro .4 0 4 +) O •.1 4-) o 4-14 4) 00 ro 4.-) u a) Ea v° a) 3 +) A 4, 0 0 '-1 rrl U '0 0) U ro H 3 •.pp1, the plaster to the building. I'll go on with that. The bridge is a glass bridge that goes through, and these ro ro A 3 .r. a) >, •.1 N H 3 3 0 G 0) a X a A t-) 0 3 aa) 4 O Ed a-) .4 .4 4-) 44 4' X 'H-I 4-)..4 as al H a (0 a-) -4 'O 0 a) ' H •4 a) O t, H m rn H a) rciH4)) 3 to b w a) au 0 0 •-1-I1 A a °1 N 0 ra a) ro H t appropriate to lighten up, and the glass that would be in here would be a little bit like the glass that's here and glass that's here. So the building has these little 4-4 a) A twists to it that surprise you and make the building a little bit more interesting than if it had been a purely H 0 a) a) A a-1 0 aJ a. O U 4 0 0 a) 0 4) • 0) 2) 0 ro 0 4.) H H a) .o 0 z you're immediately hit with this transparent bridge that goes shooting across between buildings going through the treetops. So that's the thinking. Of course the other thing we've done with the architecture is make the building feel like it steps back, so there are big open arcades that happen on the ground floor almost on all sides, and then sometimes that carries up, sometimes it's one story, but then that brings you up to another step back. Sometimes it's a roof on top, .i N 1•) m N 10 r 01 0 1-1 N M T (0 0 r` CO 01 0 .-i N N N N NNN a) rcl 0 4 a) aJ •.I H .4 3 'O •.U1 •�I 3 ° a) aw-) H u rt `4 m R +) u a4i cn o H •^ 3 +) a) H a) H N ro +) >r a) .4 4-)A O a) a) N O z ro a) a) x 0) u 3 .4 a, .1 4) a) 0 H w +) a1 a) a) tr ro 3 > A +A ro w 0) CL ,x A w 4) +) 0 4-) 01 0 ° o ai0) ro 44 3 > +) i o ° N b, '0 3 •.1 ro ro ro 41 +A) o m a1 w 4 .N 4 )n w H m a) to 4 3 A rn A m 0 o ro 4 to a p ro ro a, • 4 A 3 .4 u 4 4 0 4.) 0 a) ro 4 U a) Ha� .4 a) a) •.i >-1 •.i H +) •-I 00 0 'O a) H O w .1 +) H 4 b k H A .4' U a) .-1 H H O .-i a-) ra W 'o a) ro O +) a) 0 0 zs '4 ( 1•u ro w 4-, + a ro c�i m rtJ 'HUH Eak a°-) ro rtl u H H 'O w P7 W Eam 1 > 0 ro 0 n w m m o 3 v A N o A w o -1-)A0 RI 3 w N Zr ••i o m Zr 0 +) 0) o a) ° ro o 0)i .1-1 a) o O .4•.1 ro O ro 'o +) o U a) 0 0 4) X 3 -.4 .) 0) s4a 0) A 0) 5 b, 'U° °i A 0 0 m ro +A) 0 m z n o 0w ro a 4) A A v 0) al > v 0 a, 0 o1 0 0 O A H w W w ra 4-) 4 O 0 0 q 0 X e o N1 3 v a, ro .1 ro H En v H O 3 m 3 0 0 �.ii o 0 q m) 3 k a H D 3 0) A 0 0 +) N m ro m ro N -1-)0) '0 0ro ro o w x A m (44cn H w 4-, a)1 a, , 0 X E b 'O aJ N ai N H aJ N U 0 O .-I > POI H 3 0 a) 'U a) .Hi ro aJ °' N b, a' Nr a N N as H 1.4-1 CA 4 4 a) ro •r, 4-1 ra H H 4 a) fy O a) w •.I b( ro a) •o ro g ai o ro ° °) a, 0 a, ro •0 +.) a0) +) •0 (0 1) N H N 'O a) -4 0 a� G 4 •.`ai u 0) o w .4 o •.01 0) .X '1 0 ro X •r, '0 0) H u 3 x rn 0 a A >, H •.a u a, 3 3 A a-) 3 f N C', P N l0 r 0) 41 0 .-1 N C 0) I .i N N 1-1.i '� i1 .'1 N N N NNN difference of opinion, although either of us would be happy Ln LE r' 1- w f1 o m b1 1-) •4 N 3 ro w ro A 0 b 0 o ro 4 m 3 +)'0 a H ro 4 a) 0 C9 •r1 0 E a, a, a. ca pa o 4-) a ro H O ¢ O f.' Uco o G A p 0 0 Yes, and in fact these images, which are new from these, actually incorporate all the other items that are in this letter_ Si 0 0) H $4 .4 0 : H 3 w 3 o al H al • 0 0 o N 11 q i-1 H 4 as w V) 4-) • •.-) C, V) •.1 A ro 0w qq v 0 4 '0 O u m 0 41 ✓;)1 w w 41 V) I) 1) o v° w x v v ID ID alp 44ro q •d v o x m w w G y 11 o N H `.� i) 04-)4) u 0 >4 ro H 1 v N 3 m >, x ID w 3 w � o a.1 a) 44 p .rj .i 44 73 lo) HI 0)) m 0 +.) 0 ••'1 H 0 a •H a, >v AO ID 44 0 x N 0 11 H ID N •.°-I o w •-I w w > •.CI N 4 v •'0O CHAIR SAYOC: ROBERT GI cn 0 0) N b $ A q w 0 p 4-1 a) G 4-)3 u m 4 O 14-1 HI U w 3 .4 w >1 Ho A-). H ' 3 w 4-4 u \ c N o U O N• 0 3 •.1 0 q 3 CO w N O •�i A' i N H 0 o H 3 .S .G 03w' H. 4-)4 a) 14 H �>4 H H 3 N o y q Ei w 0 z N N .-I O A 4 H 41 N f1 4) 'd b1 +, S1 - ww a 1 •a 4 0 -.4 . o m'4 0 co 0 4-) U a +) ..0 H H H H of m aui •-I 3 0 ro '0 0 D p m a 0 G x U 3 G ro w 4-I Si w 0 H 0 0 ro u 1 0w 0 w 0d 0. •ri 004 w H 0' m •4.4 H H3 A v .4) mro .-1 N (•1 T u) 10 14 03 01 O H N M G, u) t0 f4 W 0) 0 rl N f•1 C' N .i . .1 .i .-I rl .1 r. .-I .4 N N N N N N sometime's it a terrace or a balcony. The idea of stepping the building up too so that by the time you get to the So those are all the elements. This type of architect really allows you to I think address scale and height particularly well, where a modern building would do w A 41 0 44 •.1 C I 44 4-) designs, and I don't want to do that either, so I would be w 0 G r, N A 40 ' m u q I 3 '0 o. 4-)N w ° 40 w Nti~ \. 0) a '0 0 w z N U + w O o ro ro 'O S1 '0 H 40 co 4-) tr1 4 b 0 a)O H H 0 W M w •.-I 4-) N ?1 H OU N H1r N Si .'0 0- • 1-) U 0 zH +) 3 A w1 H 3 d z t H a f1 g m 14-)z •• w p A HI •.i 0 U H 0 4. co a' C(!) 4-1 co 54 O w l0 H 0 W H o O aPO Ol wWbNF'04)Q C..) 0 a n N )4 4fi a1 a) -.-w 0 0t� ro q. N H. •.4 U U B .1 N 01 •S 111 10 r CO 01 O r1 N CO a u) to 1` CO 01 0 .-I N m C Ia1 , H H N ,-1 H H H H .-I N N N N N N Yes. What's in the August loth straight thing. These are different in that they add trees a) x a 3 4.7 14 ro 6 N +J 3 v 4 ( •.Oi ro ' 0 y 3 a) U 0 C O 4 44 O U a) C A m > D N A o •.-1 44 0A 3 o 0 rd w •'4 3 41 (4 -1 0 4) 4-7 0 0 a 4 E U Z U a) (0 0 4) 0 o +°) 0 a need to approve. If what he's showing is different, is that would be followed. The architect has stated that they are b1 0 O C .ro) 0) H ai 0 m H 0 C 0 0 N yet. As he also stated, whether it's between now and a) 4) .0 +) N A a) PO ro o 0 3 -P 0 3 y o 0 o A D 4-7 4-) m Pi A 0' ro '0 +7 00 n (4 4-) 0 0 ro o 0 H •0 .4 a) 0 u U of these also added would go back to Mr. Cannon, he would 1 0 01 44 ro 0 u 4) 4) A (4 4-7 3 (4 +) u A 4.7 0 0 0 a) a) a) 0 u U a) 0) 4A) .0 00 N 0 •0 0 ro +o) +')) a) 4-3 fi 0) 4) ro ro up. The architect also stated if he had any other issues w w A b1 0 O o -) o z +o 0 u .. 44 u 0) 3 o w A 44 cn 4 0 (4 0) U) 10 0 m a o� N 'U H U rn 0 0 0 U a U. a) 3 44 U 3 N 4-4 4 4 H a)a) 0 aJ 0 b a)H u aq) -4 u 3 C H w o +) o (4 as v (4 0 N U 44 (0 N (1) co -I 0 4.) 0 o 0 zo i O o a N (0 H ca H H co N .i N ( ) C N (0 N CO 01 O .-1 N0) P N (O 0- CO N 0 .-1 N (0 0) 'ti i (6 0rr1 ri ti 1 .,1 N N N N N N "floating wall with the that would be plaster return. I mean this is the level of 'O ' (4 3 6 00) G 0 N 4-) 0 H a) 0 +) A -H 4.)) a v 44 ro 4.7 a) 0 44 44 a 0 CD .0 3 0 0 ro >,7 u 0 3 ro -4 (4 4Od '0 3 be more interesting if there were a few twists in it like think as you look at this I don't think anyone thickness of this is appropriate; it doesn't feel like wallpaper or whatever. All the windows are very deep-set A u 4> •0 H m 4 5 3 0 f4 14 A 3 N > x ro a) H A 3 " 0 •.5 x i 0 H al A + Ti 4) o ro 0 A ca N 4 '0 al ' -4 0 H 4-7 r TI 3 a-' u 3 A A 3 0 H 0 0) 4) ro 0) ro 0 0) v) 1 4-70) 0 4-7 0 N ( P( ' 3 u a) ro • 44 4)) (4 0 •vO pretty much hot off the presses in response to his letter - and then ask if there are any other issues that he wants to x H ri a a) u 0 a) a) A ro N A a) 71) 0 U xl been very good to work with him, and as you say, it was C U7 U N Is N 4 0 .k C U N ro R( 4 u 0 H o a) 44 W 0 V 4 gn N U C 4 m 3 C zO o ..-I H O 0 0 (tl H I 4-4 > .0 E w 0 C roC 3 U 1 4) U >1 ro H 4) a))-1 3 zz b1 Ti UO 0 p) A an 4 O 4 0 '-I )4H 4W an m QO 64 4-4O ) 0 '0 a N HI ›.7 0 0) 0) 6) 0 U ) 44 O H b ro 3 `1 N ((') V ((1 (0 r CO 01 0 rl r04 0) N N (0 r 00 N 0 '� "'� 04 N N N N N H 0 o a 3 N A 0 H a) ro N U f-i N 3 N 3 e 0 U a) •f-I t A 0 b1 O C.) • ro N o ° 3 a m O 4 H A N O) H 3 }H • RI H '°U 3 0 RIb •f-I N 3 0 N 0 H 0 .4 4-) to ff-I 0 H3 U3) can see that here. It happens here. It happens here. possible to do it and that lightens that up quite a bit and makes it feel a little more appropriate at the top of the building, which we would agree. So that's an item that's changed since the last time. er on the site plan we were talking 41 0 7+ about the access from the garage into the buildings? We a little bit so that we could get two access points across. attached to the approval says that you will comply with essentially Mr. Cannon and you will comply with the co N 0 0 '0u 0 0 0 m 0 HD 4-) 0 H 0 H H H JP 0 )HN o N m GA -.."'A m N U y \ • N 0 N C. C° 3 H •H N O 0, H w E m H `CHI m a 3 H 3 0 x rn o m c7 a). C.)0 0 H 4-, 3 0 v 0 2 tn ' 0 3 3-1 a m 0 ELo 4-,N H 'J°7 d' H. C7 3 � o m prn a H 0 UNI 0 • •.-I N D a, + 0 O N '0 H ro 0A Ai rl N M C N lD 1� W 01 O ri 01 M C N t0 r CO 01 O .i N M C 01 N N N N N N Let me see if I get this o 0) O H 0 to 03 v 0 0 to 0rd • Q N 0 3 3 1-1 a •. 0 E N • H oo fa D o faa 4 a x 3 H �00 a r H 0) H b 0RI •.-1 O H H y a .0 U H H aH ) m U +) P+ package and that is 10`h. When I looked at that plan '0 rt N 0 rri m and when I looked at Larry's letter it appeared that even 0) w 0 O -) a, v ro � H z '0 ro H o HI A a W a 4 co a) N .C; 4) aJ' H things that I think we're trying to get to tonight is just generally speaking, we're not trying to microscope this thing, but I looked pretty thoroughly at this exhibit and I r of your changes and I said oh yeah, fa 3 › a) g l •• .fffC 0 m aa)) +' +) 4)) o � GA u x 0 A IT A.) H 0 0H a 0 4RI H 4-) 3 al A +_, b) 0 0 3 a ro •H ) 0 1" Ha) 01 �{ 0 ,..... _3 O 4a -.1 'O ROBERT GIANNINI: !` a) N ro 3 a) 4 . a) w +-) + g H b1 N •.i 0 HI d-) w A •H N 0 4 m° w �r N Uo roN 3 0 0 °' j ' A 0 0 o H • 0 0 a) H0 c ko A H H 4 5 4' � ftl A b, 0 0 a, U ro •4 3 v 4-)3 a) N 4i 3 •ri H i� u 0 0 ro to +0) 00 a Hrn m o •Ni w w o En 0 +fro-) H+ S .0 m o 0 O a) N 1-1 a O rn 4 a4-)4 Ha) a N 0 H ° RI 0 N +O) a) .H. 0) H 0 0 +.) 0 +.) U .1 N M Cr to 14 N N 01 O .4 N M V' 10 )0 N CO 01 0 .-I N M v' if1 rl ri .i N N N N N N CHAIR SAYOC: 1n 0 o ro u) HI a) HI u 0 4) a)o a) 0 v Q14 O g o ro >4 4) q 0 a) •r 0 O 10) 3 m '0 a) •ri 4) ,-NI H N 0 )4 0 HI 0 HI U u) u O 0) 0) 44 0 0 w N aW 0 0, 0,r0-1 0 N g 0 al X 4-) P4 4) 0 H $4 o z a a)i o 4.) 4HI 4 U OH 0 m 0 o U H p, 41 )4 >, a) o 0 (0 U 0 m b H 4.)) •0. 4au) 0 a) + H D n 0' O 'mil 0 O that? I mean you're talking about garage, but we're not 4a 0 0 0 44 G .,a 4.) 0 •H W a) m ROBERT GIANNINI: 0 U 0) 0 a) •'I to a) .. ro p k to m fat q m u 4 HI •0i H � N 0.I .. ' NI a '0 0 a H 0 4 u o w W b, W 4'• 0 H 2 s~ E. 9r H .N PA FA 0 z 6 tea) 6'0 O CH9 N 0 (tl N (H/) En cn H P4 'O H 6) 6) m E o 0 00 comments h illustration of it, It shows up a bit in this H z 0 0 x 0 HI .44 0 .0 0 H •..4 .d A 4-)ro al 5 '0 • 3 6 0 ro tT 0 a) 0 0 N N tr a 4-1 0 CO 0 0 44 o •0 '0 N O ro x > 3 •0i ate-)) 3 U 3 a) a) 0 O N 04 Hi i 0 U a) 4 .4 ro +'.) COMMISSIONER TALESFORE: A-11? ROBERT GI part of the building, or because it's such a different scale than the building do you try to downplay it a little ,-1 N 0) P N LD r CD 01 O N ri 44 (0 .0 .-i 0 0) N N N N N )n N 0 b • a) a 0 O •H 'O ro 0 0 ro 4-)) 0 d 0 a 0 N a, '0 41 A said that as of August loth you had already done at least half of the things he had requested. m H ROBERT GIANNINI: ones you've described to us: apparently doesn't seem to be much of an open issue as far ROBERT GIANNINI: also makes some suggestions and/or requests. We haven't discussed the arborist tonight, but I'm wondering if you 0 0 0 0 4.) 0 0 +) q N a) ii toH a) ro 1 44 N0 4 u .0 a, 0a) HI H u a) O •ri N H.� 0) g 0 HI o O m ro ro ro .H [ N', 41 .0a a O tT H O 44 al O 0D $ 0 3 H 0 40,) `� ZO o O O 4 'o 0 is ro H CA W N W H q Al AA m U 44 N E' H w 0 0 ai a '0 a) 4.) >+ U q Al 0 zz A m a�{) a ro 0 0 2 y, T4 •• ,-I q al S'. 0 q i, o z OG '0r4 a) a o a) a) 6 a) H S ro t7 U m H 0. O 0 a N 41) H 0 0 W 04 H 0 0 H a 0i o a) 00a 44 .40 o 0 •ri a a) +-1 U 3 N O '0 0 0) 1.4 •tea .. ) ai O 4-1 N O -44 0 H U Is N '00 3 ri N (+1 P 0) l0 N CO 01 0 '4 N 0) ri ri (0 r 03 01 ti N 01c u) N N N N N N 0) N I see it. So was there a) 0 (4 W to u a) IA 0 aw 14 H 0 a ro O A H CO 0 UI A H N o f. ro $4 4) 0 ROBERT GIANNINI: No. Well in the sense that like a) • a) .4' A •.l A 411 41 O N 0 0 x en U cll O"j rd 0 41 0 U 0) 0) 4)) q 4' )) 0 0 ,L1. 1 0 0 0 A 4) 0 N '0 4.)) R 0 H N 0) a) NHI A 7r N r�-I o m aA) 4A) 0 44 0 A 0 a)34 3 N N z° '0 0 garage the trees that are actually between Highway 85 H •.I 0 • • O 1, N .0 1 m H 3 al 0 0 0 0 U 4) 0 ro 0 0 A 3 4.)) ro01 A 3 • 44 0 1(a 3 0 A rn 0 44 '.4 (n d U) A0 34 4, a This little zone right here? A 4 4-1 0 0-1 U A rd 4�- ,1 0 •N O N 0 p. o f' 0 0 bU H 0 rt1 U 0 0 E .0 1.21 rd (H7 4-1 W � a COMMISSIONER TALESFORE: we would be replacing them with new trees as part of the 0 40 0 0 0 0 .H A a) a a a) 0 z El 4 0 0 H m 0i 1a H O H H H H", a HH 0 S H fq `z". 4) 0 3 0 0 A 0 a U 0 0 4 0 a) •rl A •Ht CO 0 U a) 0, m "g So the landscape Okay, I'll direct my CHAIR SAYOC: architect? Co Yes, I just need a 0 [1 A 44 O H N 0 0 m r0 o cM 4 0 co•$ z �.a 0 0 W HIN400 H cn H H cn N E " 4kl p 0 O FC U3 H at to .0 a' 64 w pi 0 0 cn O 0 E. VI 3 (9 H H I O0 . 0 -) a , 4 •.1 0 •rl A S-Im H -4 U N M r-1 N m a vI N r 00 61 0 .-1 N Mi a ut to m 01 0 .i N 1''1 a lA .i .i H .1 .1 .1 r♦ .1 N N N N N N 0 41 u •.I 3 .8 a) O )4 m 3 0 A 01 H .0 A 3 0 a) A 04 AA.I m 3 H A b a U N ') ro 0) •r-1 0 '0 i '4 m b) A A 0 41 .4 A 'O it in dark colors, so it's in this dark sort of in the v 44 H N N. 0 0 A U . A a) A 0.1 H '4 0) 34 $4 b1 H Oi HN 0 a1 0' pp, 0 0 N N N u lA) m 0 S A 0 0 H 0 0 0 0 0 U A N u 0 H Q 0 3 0 0 0 4) 34 •.I a) 0- A 4.) H 0 bay. Instead he suggested why don't we do it more as a grid where the legs are actually the same width as the lintels horizontal stripy element, which we did, so that it feels 0 0 0 AAi 0 w m A . to m A •r1 1 H A 3 U 44 4-1 0 A A H 0 N 44 N 3 A 4 A •II 00 LI 0 D +) .Aj 0 x ro 4 •ri A H 0 A 0 44 0 0 44 0 m 3 e inappropriately. ro '0 '0 0 (4 • 0 0 0 A 0 (i1 0 w x g 41 0 A N. HI N 01 A A H • N H N H A 0 N A ? 4 0 0 H 3 a) c40 N H (4 A 0 a) .'1 H •rl oo c5 z o '0 A b 0 "4 ' HO o .-1 m 0 0 ro N� 0 -.-I 0 .44 >. 4 HH£ •rl 4) )i 0 (-1 H a) N H 4) o OU ro ro 0 0 '0 m 4a w o 0 44 '[ N N 11 N Wa H A 0'0 0 >1 0) O q �i H N AN Arl P4. �i a R. •H '0 x G . 0 0 cn o 41 3 l 4 O 4 0)) 0 14 (4 H W O'o 0 3 0 N 4 0 0 0 m a 3 0 '0 0 $4 A +0) 0 30 4) C A -.5.1 ?G w �. H H .0 4-1 0 ,4' 0 4) A •rl H H 0) h H M .1 N m a N 10 r 00 01 0 r♦ 4) .Ni a N N 0- CO 01 0 1-1N m a 111 .1 ,-I .I .1 r1 .i rl ri N N N N N N to go through an area that also has parked cars, if I see the plan correctly. So you're going to go behind cars that +' 0 0 0 +) m M ro 5 O 111 0 0 .O O°, H H H 0 ol •0) ?4 0 N b ro U b, 00 0) •r1 0 ro A 44 0 > 3 .4 41 ro u 0 A O 0 •� sa .4 .0 a w u >, ro 0 0 O J"0. O O E � ••-1 0 14 4-4 b, 6, w m u +°1 b H U! .'4•' >r N H 0 +°1 a) H 3 •.a H .-I 0 J cn w u) .04 0 3 0 •>1 0 D O .0 4-) W E A W ro 0 o N g N co co .? `a) •,NI ul 1x O 0 Y+ 11 H ro m u 0 0 j%�] 'r4 H co w >, a) +) (~ �i 0 '�i z 4-' .ci 44 4) 0 1) ,O` O 0 zzW 0 0W 0 4 a WW0 ro w •rl 0 +) +� x 41) x H 0 0 M s01 m N 0 0 cn H co) co 0 •r1 [02n 0 0 0. � x E x E 0n x ro q > 0 .) 40 0 h 0 W q O N 0 U D 0 O ri r1 •,4 U) H 4 a) 3 u u) 3 a) 6, N a-) q 0 co w q m 6 0 ro N °6 a 0 a1 +) A +N) 0) i°i a, N egress way. If it looks like this is backed up or that's not very practical, you can go the other way. H H }) ro N H H w 4) N a) 4-1 0 3 m H T7 011 0 b 4-1 H u) 0 N '0 01 01 H H 0 0 0 H O U1 •.1 0 Cn 4-4 N ro w 0 O Zf 0 0 U 0 m All right, and then just want to call the roundabout, that is going to be pavers but the (0 m M e-1 r-I (0 rl ri 0, N N N M C 0) N N N rest is going to be asphalt, or are we having pavers all yet, it's still going through Engineering. H H La c• W 41 O •.i L7 44 ai H U) m u cn H 4". 5 Just to clarify, are you asking now proposed the new signalized intersection. O ro H 41 4-1 0 0 b, 0 o m b, N 4" E ro C N m 0 N 4-1 N •0i E 10" .1..) z ro rn 0 0 0 fJ O U 0 0 ro H C O other ingress/egress points, but the new intersection is 01 ro 0 N H w 0 0 'O cn H H C7 0 1n En C. H 0 OU 0 A) 0 0 aJ the plans correctly, I just want to make sure I've q 0 s~ ro 0 4.) 41 N A rt0 0 N U 0 N N U 0 0 0 3 � ro +) 0 H 0 0 v 0 4 4-, 0 0 d +) N •k .0 °' 0 O least in this first phase in order to get to the parking c• 0 b, ro N tn o 41�{i ?1 N 0 w h N O a ro N ro rn Yes, that is true, to the site. There is a right-in/right-out at the southern edge of the site that would accommodate these existing buildings here. 0 0 4-1 U • 0 a) N 7, 0 •.-I 0 4-4 .4 U 0, 0 N $.1 A 0 0 b, 0 0 H k +) W 0 0 pµG 04 (j 41 } ° N W +� to U O q O U N 0 .0 H b So again I'm just thinking of the backup of cars, so this is why I'm addressing this tonight. So if you're in the parking garage rl N M P N b r m N O N M Co O, O (0 N rl ti H ti .i `i ri '-1 N r1 N N N N 3 H a) N a) C d o 4 x 0 4-) N N w0 H N u)N 4 a '0 3 •d1 0 a) N U 0a) o N 4 aJ a) +) T .4' O t Ci 0, A ro o m 0 >, A (4 H A 3 •4 0 p u 0) 'o N. °U 3 u u ,C ( alx 40 m 4--)(hi 3 ) d' 3 0 0) o H a g NH 4.) +) because it goes across at a little bit of an angle, but if 4 N w ro ..-1 3 Ca TS ra 3 a) 1 to A u A C 4J 4j p) o N >, o m >, a) m ro A tr A 1) rd •14 A o 3 • rou o m U >, 1J Id 3 4) vgg 01 A x 44 aai Pc) a) 3 0H o m w I we'd be more than willing to bring the special pavers out to here, or as I talked to him further we might see if he 1n 44 b) 0 • 40 O C C' C b' H a) + 0 .� it 0 0 •� o 4-)q .-°I H a) •N '0 m w ro 6 0 o 0 3 4 a) Enr 1• 4 )n a) 3 a IA)44-) a) .1 a H °C tn N N N w 0 '0 0 ) ).4a u 0 •r1 m 1-11d o H 3 0 q o 0) rt A A U) 3 m m N En +) 0 G ,d H C 41 A "A•n a) 4 N a) 3 . o ° C7 4-) C .-1 to A +) H to b) 3-P 0 0 0 D 7 N, H N .� Wz 0 aa)i a u aa)i 3 1d A . 4, A 3 m t07 +) p , En m 0 .°C 0 4-)m 3 H H H C 3 m 0 a >a rd E ° 0 m N an o C. (A '0 o ua a rd v 4 - GE 51. C a) C 4.)) U 0 w °>A N s •ww, 1) 0AA 4-)3 m 3 u b j' willing to just do it. It, certainly would not be un-nice to have pavers go all the way out to this point. •-i N 1+) C u) (0 Co Ol 2 2 e2-I •y r, H., H2 m N N N N N N O a) +) A 4 a) •.1 •.1 o ro ro w0 [O 3 a U S1 N x vl to - +) 4o C •r1 }) a) 0 0 a) N b N 4-1 A A rE'n d ro 0 H I> P 0 H 0 a '0 o.0 r 3 '4) +) C ,d ,n C u° m m a) a 4 z 0 A o Oa 4 x u) HI •411 q N b N .i •-I 0, H nj b b) •,N1 A N 3 _ 4) a) a) u) ,d 4 n b) A •0 different look and feel. right place for it is we want to make it special, and if we start to use it all over I tend to think it lacks its roar t1 m a) a) )4 v C R '0 +')) 54 � a) 0 0 3 H 4a 3 >, m w 0 w.1 b cri 0) SU, 0 'd >m° n m w Atn , 0) 3 N o 0 o A P. a) 0H )-I H 3 .O 3 1. '0 u .r. 1 .4" V! a) 0 U U 4-1 to .0 b) 3 (H(�� C CsHCs�� •.i ,0 ro .4 o a)tr) c..D 4-) (5 ro e. 0 •1i U 4 .d co N °3 2 3 G A asW O a A� H 3 >, N 0 N �z 0 rn H N N o n En 4x 4Hl) 0 U 4-)•,11 4-)(0 a H U O z•�z H H. ) C N vO O b qNU I-) 0 a N A A q Ua) 1) +) a) 3 C m ,4 v 0 41 b .. N .8 A � t 3 here. We would not disagree with the way out to that, although it wouldn't be our first choice because, ., N tel c 111 b r CO m 2 ., 2 N .1 N H .r, 2 al o ., N N N N N N ROBERT GIANNINI: ..-I a) •.i 4-1 a) O 0 u H > +U) 3 ro 0 0 m m 44 m 4' 4-) U >1 E. N H N • •rl '0 0O m u ro +A+ x 4 al W E �+ f°� z v cn W 00 0 E 10 0 a z ro o H o H 0) 10 Cil Er, . x 0 ox •� .4 aN) LH o 4-, U 0 ¢•1 W G • .4 a) 0 a) 4 +) a) N P • 1>i 5 N 4 m 14 o 3 W 0 4 0 0 0 '0 u a) 04 A w .0 vo1 a) rJ So right behind this tree, rather than this being two stories there is another stone lintel piece that goes across at this same point. So that's roof along the building of D entry. Yes. There isn't a picture of it, but what he's talking about is this is the primary entrance into this building, except for the fact that this building doesn't have a primary entrance. People will 0 4)) H 1H O a) H a) 0 0 N U It 0 ,4 .4 a) 3 0 UO) 0 ..-{ • A 0 O r-1 3 0) m a ' a U .H 4) +) ro 3 a) rn 0) 0 (N 0) a) building, and we had shown a trellised canopy going out and he thought perhaps it might want to be maybe a glass a) 4 W 0 A '0 O 3 ro .44 .4 U U O 0 )s 4 ID 0 H 0 4-) 4 0 A H •d v 3 I would have to go back to the images you have in the set, but he thought it might be interesting if the roof of 10 M 0 4 H H(I) o u N 4 N N �. \ i co o10 Hcn O H H E 0 U rt C9 3 H +) H a ID GL A O o H (.7 rl 1 0 o 061 a ID H .i N t+) a 00 10 r CO 0) 0 ti N 01 an 0) l0 0- 00 0)) 0) 1 a 0 ,N N N N N N just going to say I think 3 H JOHN SHENK: there are some of these things that as opposed to the architecture go to the site. There was another thought that ro u ID 0 0 1 U 4 a) x a) ro u a) 4) ro x 0 O H 0 0 ID 0 x 0 x 4 0 ro U u 10 location up there, and so we're studying other locations on the site. So as opposed to the architecture of the buildings it may be that's where the landscape architect's addressing those as well. then Commissioner Bourgeois. because I didn't want to take you through a whole list of a) N 3 0 q o x m G 0 0 5 0 x .11 o 3-1 it .HN 0 4 w a) m 0 :4 A 3 o x w o 0 ro .0 +�) 0 4-1 4-) 4 +)rEi 3 0 b1 a) H a) 0) 4 0,U N � 0 0 30-1 A `° 414 o l0 0) O4 +) 0 -I N • 4a 4 .4 4 O � N H .0 '0 a) A >- H a) H '0 }U) a) 4 4 0 0) N +) H N 4 x v rq I-)3-1 40 U• 4-3 O T) 0) •- w P m a) .4 O •.1 0 0 visual impact of this building fagade in height. If you don't mind, I pulled those out. Let's just review the base of the tower element. Has that been taken care of? That's been addressed? N cn 0 D H N 1� 1 N \ N ( U N u. \,4 0 o H O cnt° cn H H E 0 U N t9 3 z„ H zz rn cn 0 0 ko fc � r-I 00) 06 a N H .1 N M m 01 10 r CO 01 0 1 N N N '0 10 1-1.^CO 0) 0 N 01 '0' N i rl rl 10 .i .i N N N N N N top. That happens here and it happens here so that it's N )`• 0o H ro +°) 0 0 +) 04 H N 4 41 A .44 U 50-1 LH O 4) 3 o H 0 U 4-) 4.. H I 0 4) •rl a) 3 44 0 C chi 3 0 4 00 A N 4 )1 4 o H F C. N to H a) O 0) •rl w ;� 0+ N 3 0 W 00 �GI 0 q 4) I (4 N N .4,' H .41 O H a) U A-) 40 U O4 •N N H N ° 4 2(0 0 3 b 0 a) pH) 0 N A aJ HHH N O 2T 0 1111 4-1 0 HI 4 N 4 ro A O IS 0) 0' 3 .0 '0 0N aH A 1-1 look at are photographs, and probably not true to color I a) a 0 0 H 0 0 01 0 W 0 0 ..4 dJ N 9' N 4 cn 0 0 rl N ro 0 0 3 first Netflix building as far as the details to compare 0 HI A N 4 0) o J) '0 O ri 3 to ?, N 3 m H 'O m�I 3 H m ' w • 4-1. 4-1 z m m 04 04-1 0 3 A. N 4) +')) 0 something else? 0 N a) m 0 u 4-)) A b ro 4 (0r-I 3 o N .-I al 4 N N 0 0 '0A 'H 4N o 4) N O O N 4 N 34 3 O N H H \ 0 42 4 4.)) 0 H 3 z N A '9q A '0 U t. H u, 0 v FC H 4-1 ) u)H H 0 W 0 ••' 4 b Ew 0 H N C=4 H W H A U3 c7 m u) >4 z W . • Pi 'r'�i H 4 H al H 0) WH zzH E. z4H 4) a 2 rC P; r� 2 w H z zn m H 4-)l 0 0) 0 4 aa'i off Pi N H 004 H P4 •rl •ri I ralGN o p4i° 0 o 0 C4 1a0) a .N A 0 +) W 4.:= a) 0 .di 4-) -) 4 'LJ a) }) H t 3 3 0) of 0 w rl N M C ul tD N CO 01 0e-I N M C M l0 CO 01 O ri N M <M •..� H ri .i r) ri H N NNNNN that element broke the line of the overhanging roof above 0 H 1:) O 41 b 4 N 0 0 � 0 4 HI U N N 4.4 N 'O a) O .4) u) tn 3 +°) .0i +)Ni a) ,d .A 3 00 0 H 0 0 >, 0) 0 0 0 H 3 3 )-1 —4 H O V 3 +) N 0 W 0 r� +H) H m w A N 0 N 4) •0 HIW m o. AS ro A 3 H • 4-) a 0 0 0. 4i N fx O H 1) ••Ci .[ H, 3 0 H'd 4 3 0 441 A' A 3 H o i) AN 0.1 4) ' N HI 0 b LH 0 0 9 0 � N 40 0 0 H 0 44.) F. w HI 0 H0' A +-) m the fifth floor I think you addressed? Yes, we talked about that. L) C )-I 0 U N H 0 4 a) 0 G m Wa H El x 0 U H m W a 0 o, N 0 N 4 04 O a) u-) N H H N •..4 Y 0 4) 4) m 3 0 0 4-10 '0 aa)i ro N 0 • •�4 0. m 01 0 0, ro HI H� N• 0 } N 0 o 0 a)' 0 1-1 a •0 w '0 a >r a) 3 04 N 0 a a) o 4) 4 a) N 3 °J 3 oNN+) ••I N 4•.i Nroa) N H .-4 4) •.i 4) N cn H. H H 0000D ai 4) ¢' G E w 0'N 4N°.>., ,N bl 0 aa4-)) � N W 00 bl z 44 4_,.A'0 NNH4q J-.i zro N •.°i •. 0 01 0O . u 3 .0 N H a w x a)) o' 0' 0 4-) •�rl 0 4 u1 U4 H o co N. 4-) 4.) 4.. ro OF to 0 a cn I) .- +) a of q A 4 a) o 0 A 4) ) ••4) . 3 0 • p CI .I-) H 0 0 0 'a N 0 N U) N N N 0 +0) 4.)) ,i~ q N 4 R) N. 4) 3 0 } T{3 4) 44) A 44-) N 0 4--,'0 444 .4 10 1- m O\ o rl N M C In 10 I"' CO 01 O .-I N M G' N rl .i Hri rl .-1 .1 rl ri NNNNNN o 'O a-) 0 ro ro A a) 0 0 a) 41 m a) H a) N 0 o o 4) H .4' o 0 5 A • +1 H cn H 0 a) 23 0. 4 m 4 0 +G) af - 1 $ +) H o +) m z a a) 0H 0 OH H 41 0 O 0 H ,!~ N 0, a + a) •rl C4 + N W oo •.-) ro a v +' 0 .0 o4-1+ O 44 •mil 0. 4 a) The existing one, this will be free right -out, so anyone leaving the site heading this way will be able to do this and head out this direction and it intersection. But you're going to have ISSIONER O'DONNELL: to have a congestion point then? You've got two lanes going in there, you've got a third lane going in there, and they >, 0) 3 0 o a) w H (S4 0 N.y a) M +, ro 4 -I A N N 0 0 0 N •rl 4-1 .4 +) 0, H 0 N• 0) o m d 0 p4N 0 ca -rl +i N 0) A. W 0) 41 O a) W •rl •rl +) 0 O o a 0 H 0) o 14 .) 4) 0 +) aai 0 0 H 'd o 00 N o o W A 3 option is a traffic circle. N w 4' 0 G ro 'O a) a) q 4 0 •00 COMMISSIONER O'DONNELL: entryway there? It's so close. N ro +' 0 4 1 H N a) i +J N O 2 N a N N as zo 0 Nv 2 W N a) H H W roi a o >, H N 0S 0 H O X � z a N a A H O 0 4 C7 H >r OH c 40 GI IlcI V)0 0 oa ° 0r�1 a , N c-4 O A o +) +) H 0 0) ri N M V' ,.) ,O N 03 01 0 rl N M m 0) l0 N Co 01 O .. N ti • .0 0 0 0 w N 0 41 O 0) 0) 0 U 0 0 0) a O 11 like to go back to the pavers issue. I really don't feel strongly one way or the other about how you transition that, but what I do care about is when I hear pavers I think pervious surface, and what I just heard is that it N 4 •i 4 ts)N 4' +) A-) N , ro ro •rl ro 4' 4) •rl 0 0) 0 m • 0 .0 m 41 4 0 0) 0 0 0 H•,4 x D 01 )4 a) 0 ate) 444 0) A 0) 0 N H 0 a a) a) a) 0 3 A N .4 3 N O H .4 -i S 44 (I) +) 0 0 o, •rl 0) N 0 a) A N +) +, O al 0 R. 0 ••d 0 W .a C.)'c7 0 a +) a) H +-) 0C'. 0 H 4-1 .N 0) •rl 0) N '0 Aro +o m GIANNINI: point for stability of all those cars coming in on that COMMISSIONER BOURGEOIS: Even if it were pavers? a) 4) A a0) 0 3 CO a) 0) R•(0 .. w +A) 3 '0 4-1 H ro w +' 0) +) w a) N ro A a) +' N N O 41 0 O ro 5 .4' '0 H 0 .H ROBERT GIANNINI: set on that. It wouldn't hold up if it were set on sand as a) d H H N r. o+' H 0 w N a) N U 0 H 4 z o N o0 N U as cn H H 0 a .0 0. 0 > cn �'4 z U(0 0 O H p co) c)0 H z u 0 W >1 22 a H O z rC rC 0 H t7 H o H0) U) 1 l0 cn a) a H U RE'. 'II c) ro a 0 >4 N )>-I N a0.) 0A N H ro 41 C 0 ,C rl N M C N l0 r co 01 0 rl N M P N l0 r co 0) O rl N M If) r, intersection probably won't be there. It's up to how the ro I (n 4.) a) ro 0 a - I 0 -4 0 3 4i 0 u 44 p ro � 4 41 n 4) D •Ci 41 o ro D o 1 3 ro o •�i '0 ro 10 . 4) 0 0) " x 4 m 0 N .41 ro i ro 4n o 4) N u ro ro 44 > ro n 41 u to i H AU o 4) H4) 'CS b N lT •.I N •..a) •.I A 4) O N N 4) m ro o 0 3 •.1 .1 a) r1 4) MIis 0 0) \ ro C.)m +) •.I 44 > A.d H A a) 0 D d, a) 1J 4 44 H 4) 44 41 O 'J N Co)4 A ro a) ro .,-I 44 ro a) 4 \ 4�1 4 44 .4 .0 0) 41 ro a ,� H ro co '0 ro 0 0 4) ) 0 0 .0 (0 U ro a) 0 4) ro m 4) 4) w .G 4 Cy 0 >, 4-) U •.4 W 0 o •.4 a 3 ZO H o N ro ro d w 4) a) d U O ro 4) ••,-1� H 0 A 0 0 a) d O d UO N 41 -�P� b H q 3 v+' -0 y u) 0 0 ' a H v) 1 b ,y N O 9, r1 •.I 44 •.4 0 4 4: 4) 0 to 4: HH++, lT A fl ,.N4 ,H-I •.UI �+ 4.)) a) N •.I 0 N 0 ro '" • �, a to 44 A m. 0 4) 44 O 4)) 44 a) a +) ›.+ w '4 H 44 4a .3 •.I N 4-) .I N a) 44 4) W I 41 0 4-) }) z a a) a) ro .-4 a) A ai 44 4-1 a) •4) •.I C7 H ro (0 -.i R. 44 .i 4-) 'd 41 a) 44 x 41 0 44 O 4-) d A, a) C) .i .4 0 0 r1 1 H 4i }J 2 )-1 a) x 44 b) N - 4)' a) •.4 'd u) • A. ro b ,C1 4. - ", 4) a) •.1 •.I 10, (4 A 4-1 • • a) - 3 d 0 0 4 41 0 44 .i of ,a 41 ro o •.I O •-1 "ci O +). 0 4-) 4.) ,q. al 0, 4-) O H o 4-) a 44 rWWz ro 0 4 a o w q y4 a H 2 O u0i o 4 •4 0 0 4-) a 04 ' 44 2 H •.1cn ro ro o N o a�4 ro • rn x 41 N ro 4) w 4: 0 4-4 HI H rho ›, 1� 'O 3 4: 4) ro ro A U Ll a) H 'd o U) U) A'i a) •.I S4 U 4) aq) a'i 44 U) 41 a) a' ,0 4n O m 41 a N -P 4) a) 0 N r+ H a 44 U) ro ,4' (7 .4 •,-1 U H a a) ro •.4 N 4) 0 A. al 0 )+ a 0 H 4) I 4--)roo m o R 0 ti N o 0 o o +) ro m 0 •.I f-'. O U U b, )7 0 H a) 4) 'd a, h •.i U 0 a u, A A 1 a) 0 0 H N 0 44 N N d H .41 .4 0•.i lT ro O O 44 4k a 4 O a) i) (0 44 4) 4' di ro 4a C ro 4) a) •.i a) 0 •,i 4) a) a) p, a) -.l a) 0 N .A N .0 0' U .4 4) • 4) •.i )-I .s4 H ?C •.I 4) a) 4) 0 a) N 4-) 0 H 4-) a) .i •) U 4�)1 A 4) 4) 4) A Cl., H J-, N. .4' ro 4 0 41 0 41 0 0 Py 4: d 4) N 3 A d O -P •.1 0 I 0 C) 1 •,i e I ri .i N M V N lD r m U) O .i N. M a` )() b r W 0) 0 .1 N (•) C N Yes, this one. H H ROBERT GI a) 44 F.' 4) a) U 4; ro 'CS 4) 0 x 4) 4: '00 H 4s 0 O 3 A H 4) 41 7:3 a) 44 a) 44 I don't know why but it looks like it's pretty close. to put another right turn there. Actually on that one I should H z H ROBERT GI 4) ro 4A) 44 0 4-1 H 0 .4 tn H N a) A S.' to Traffi ' O a) 0 .0 d0) RI 14 N x 44 a) 4) 10, 4) b •H 4 0 f) H 4) 0 n) 44 N •.I 0 Ell '0 °o •�.I a. 444 A •-) (7 44 4) Q N U) •• A. 4) 4) •.1 Crl Z w 4x G 0 0 '4)-.. A N N 0 a -4 a 4 (4 w a a, a) H N o 0 H 44 a• >) TA 0 0 0 °a 4)) 6 m 0 4) ty H 0, 0 44 o ail o ro'0 3 4 H 0. just like to at Albright. That's going to be needed for ultimate • a) ' a) 4) 0 44 al 0 4) A 0 aa)i 0 0 0 A 0 G m 0 4) (1, 0 0 ro 41 U (4 En A� -) • 4I 4A-) 0 0 0 3• 4)) '0 4) '0 0 G U 44 O 4) 41 a) 44 o x o 04•.N4 '0 0 4) 4) Q) >, .. ro� 4) o 0 0 a) ultimate conditions that capacity is needed to have an alternate entry point and exit point for the site. when it comes together (inaudible)? N -r{ d 4) (4 )T 0 .i 4) 14 4 (4 ROBERT DEL RIO: 44 0 D a Phase One layout of that new entrance point. ultimate layout of the site that elbow from the new .i N (+) C ,N 0) r U) 01 0 ti 01 .01 -1 .i .0)-, r- M 03 it as wildly practical, that right turn in there. I think some cars will use it, but I see it as it's really going to 0 A 0 O get used on the COMMISSIONER O'DONNELL: a) 0 4 a) 4.).) the next one and I'm going to turn right, what? The guys that went in right first are going to meet 0) 0) .4) +O) 4-4 H m 4 ro •4 A D •0 ro .4 m .0 ro 0 a) >, o a) o o 4) N 05 co b1 H0) 4_, a) •4t si a) N a) 3 o 0 0 a) H H (0 0 0 0 0) ri ,4 0 X 14 +) .0 m 0.1 vo o 0 -.44 0 as 4-) ts as •A 0 " 0 (4 d U C 4 a) H0 0 a) 0 allows the flexibility that somebody could come in and do this movement and go this way, somebody could also come in 4 U +-) w u a) a) .4 +H) � l-1 O 0) .4) of 4) N (1• a) '0 +-) .4 0 0 0) 0 a) H 3 •� +) N o a 0) 3 4-)H A 0, A si 1-1 a 00 4 ro 00 n 3 a) 1413, �, T) a) 0 4 0 t71 +.) H V)) 4.3 xo.0 a 4 m0 -.1 4-) z 4-,a 4 0 4 u WzW ro 4 0 al H 4.) N x +., m 44 H cocis .0) 0 k � 0 o N )4+) N U 0 3 4 •.1 +) 0al al ) 4--)3 >, .0 o '0'0 '0 4-1 ro -.4 m ro 0 0 4 N H H 0) O N N ro (44 U co 00 H O co H E 00 >, m 3 z„ a� m� 00 coo o °� a N H H .-i N m P ,n (0 N CO 01 0 r( N m m u) 0 r CO 01 0 .1 N m 01 NNNNN I'm still going to take a right turn. How do I get to the D H H 4 O u! N N 3 4-) • 43 -) 4 N w q 0) +A) 0 u 0 4 4 4-) 4o b1 R, H •.44 ro +) a) 0 X +) 0 N +) U From Winchester you'll be able ROBERT DEL RIO: U 0 COMMISSIONER O'DONNELL: No, we're talking some other phase you're telling me is going to be different. So the only way you'll >, n• 3 0 o (1) 4 O 0 4 3 O 54 a) 4-3 .) a) 0 a 54 4 0 0, 14 5' 4-)O A 0 Q a 0 -.4 O W1x 3 z 0 A 14 0 4 m Z co co H W 4 0 m 0a 4 0 o A 44 4 a) •H 3 a) 44 (13 Let me take a shot. I think of it as let's not think of any other configuration, because we may is in evidence today. So this is what we're building; there are the flows. And you're right, if you're coming northbound on Winchester you're most likely going to pull b H 4 H ro •'1 0, a) +) 0 L1 •.1 4-) s( a) 0 0 4-5 .4 +14 .) 0 � •0 44 0' m ro 34 0 •44 3-I 0) H 0 >, 4 0 44 4-,AO H (s. 40 0 m 4-) 0 0 3 +�) aa)i m A N 4 o •H 4-1 U 0 4-1 4) 0 0o O 4-)+) 4H-1 0 •r1 (4 3 44 0 a) a) o 0 a) O to 0 4-1 •.i 4-1 ,4 H O 0 4-) 0 0 jt a a4-) shot before you have to go do a whole U-turn. I don't see 0 0) 0 13. rl N O+' Nq. \ N N U N co 3 00 H lfl H cr E 0� 0ro C7 3 0 „ H z a a4$4 00 1 cn 0 O O1 a a4 )4-) H C u) 10 r m 01 rl N m C u) l0 0 CO 01 0 .1 N m a 10 .i ") " .) ) .-, . -1 .-, N N N N N N N O A O 0 4 w ro m 1 0 0 ro a) .) b HO, 14 4-) 4-1 3 a) a) i) 4A) 4-1 >', (CI 1) w al )0 E n ro H 4 O N H] t 0 ›+ 14 1-4 M 4) 0 H m 0 O d W �. p. . 0 H 0 0 0 U H 0 v a a .. x to H a N0. 0 N0 0 A Q VIUi u 4Hi m .A 4' W H a 0 H N M 4 N ) 43 a 00 0 0) U a) C. 0 y H A ro H A RS 4-) C.)d+ k as ways to get more people in quickly and off the street of for the sight. I realize that, but I H O 0 H ro 0 0 .H is a) H 0 a) a) W 14 E N 1 3 w 0 uH)VI 0 D H ,q 0 0 G' A m people to get in more quickly and off the street. a) al0) A 4 ro rn 0 N N ice) H U AS rd 0 • H H H w 0 a) O m •HH H W W w GI 1 cn al +) GI 0 GI 0 0 0 0 H a,' H w U) O an H Pi H U 0 M 0 U U U N 0 Y a) but as I'm thinking about this special ingress/egress '0 0) 0 is OZo O •1-1 H l0 U IC31 H H N E w O .G H U (.4 '0 • H 'H z > H HI P >1 •H 10 0 8 a)0 H A 1 0 01 0 U U d N 3 0 v aU. x .0 0 0 H N ,1 •.i 4.) CO N M c N N N CO M O '1 N M m N 10 r CO 01 0 rl N M v' M •i. .-1 N N N N N N tn l 0 ro a ro A 0 0 0 0 ro a H 4) 0 0 ccq a else to that? else to add. The configuration that they have been studying, and should a subsequent phase come through a) H 0 H (4 14 •.i +) 3 0 aa)) A H 0 •-1 ro 14 � 0 4-3k) w 0 01>1 10 0 O (1 4_, 3 TS O 'd0 A A 4) 0 T H a) 3 0) a A 0n N m 1') �qb� •ca - 0 V•0 0 0 F' Ll a) 4) N 4 O 00 ro •O-I H m 2 0 m • 01 0 ro to U 0 H 0' •U v) O D 4 H 4U 0 3 N i) O O 0 ›, z 4-) • A 14 14, TS A m 0 ro 3 d) a) backs up onto Winchester. That strikes me as probably not a good plan. N • 0) 0 0 U ro 4)) 0 a) >, x w 0.1 w A '0 m 4 ala H H •U 4 '0 4-)wu) m 0 A U a, a) H w U 4.) 3 +1• - ci 0 •.-i N' ia-1 'O ,C i-) z H 0 H U f] 1) •.i 0 0 0 H a) 0 ed ai m +) ro ° o 0 Pg A A o H .0 a N N +-) H AGI ra a) 1-1 h H HN 'd' OU HA. •.i ro a (f) 4 CO H 0 '0 HI O .I p � •'-4 0 • a) O 14 U 4 4-) ff I go to q •i O 'O A Hi 0) o A .0 0 ro ro •H 0 d H O O 0 0 0 z N tn 0 0 m a v u 4 0 a) a) 4) O H 4 d N M c N b r W 01 O r1 N M c N lD CO 01 O rl N M N H .-. .i H .i , .i , , N N N N N N H 0) 01 (0 4-) 11 H f-I af .3 0 a1 4-) H 4-) P 0 v) +) 0 H >1 -) al 0) )40 4-) co a) 3 N N w° w H >1 0 0 on 4-)0 on a) al 0 0 a) u) a) P. 0 co D. rci W A + 0 0 0 •d-I +) '0 L'' 0 4( ) •.1 00 a) (0 o 0 ,,qoG N W 0 0 0 I) Ca • II N 11 - Hp N >1 N 00 0 N q R. 0 (1) .1) 0) o 4 a, a) 0 E O 0 0 0 P. 0 �1 0 4e4 0 0 .)N4-1 >+zM 4-)H 1 co >, a) 0 a4--) aA o 0 0 a) a) h P N +) 4 44 4 .1 +) 0 0 0 A ''CI ) 0) 0ail O .)0 iH � 3 .0 +) H O H wanted to be able to come out of their neighborhood and do 0. N 0 a) N 0 0 0 0 0) -1 0) 0 )0 0 O H aJ ro m N O 44 (0 ROBERT DEL RIO: Yeah, okay. 'O •i{ 4 O cn 0 4-) as 4 H 0 a) co E 1-) O H 4 cn tn O 0 W 0 u 0 S4 0o 41 ra W a a z 0 H co 0 H R 4-100 0 Fa u a) •00 4'• 0 0 a Lig if this was necessary for emergency vehicles. That was the other thing I was thinking for the two, but I'm just speculating. • -) 0) (0 N 0 a) 0) b 11 0) a) 0) (0 0 N • O co co co h they would like as porous a site as possible. In case 0 0 O 0 (0 C) 44 0 0 0 0) N a) 0 a) 0) O W (0 0 0 0 (0 0 cn a) somewhere else. This is not a very porous site from that perspective, so having more ingress/egress points is looked 0 L0 0) 0 H N H a) 0 N N N \ N N co \ 44 z0 0 H 0 Cncn `r H 'H E 0 as U 3 1-4 z A O 0 0'j4 I cno O O1 , N 41 H r♦ N 0) G' N l0 (� CO 01 0 0 N 0) 0l) (0 04 CO 01 0 N (•1 C II) '-1'") " 1 ri 'i fi . ( e1 N N N N N N 0 4 0. 11 a) 0 0) 3 0) H to 0) 4.) (0 a) O 4) O 0o 0) +) N b1 R. i 0 0 0) 0 people and what's going to be on •4-) CT Winchester that's going to prevent people from swinging N .W-I (aa) HHi 00 0 0 id H •L 0 0) 0) 44 4 N (0 +-) a.) 0 . x G rt 4-) a) •4 rt .0 0. U 0 '0 !-1 a) o 0 H •.4 00p •.0 H 4)) 4 (0 ?C •(1d-1 of O 7) O 1 a) E 1-) 0 X 0 -1 `0 (1) 4.) b1 H � >1 3 W 41 �q x 0 0 N N 0.4 )d .-I •n ,p0 0 HI aO) a-) CD 4-) 'O (0 0 q a) a a) 0 H o z o otn w a zzn 0 Ul z -iHf Cn 0 0 0 H _) +) 0 0 H W O b 0 0 h U 0 N q a) Fin o 0) 0 cif.(0 af 3 N 3 3 +) 0. °u 0 .4 +) o a)a) (0 a) V) •r1 N R. I '-1 N M .0' 0) (0 10 CO 01 0 think on sheet C-2 it shows Winchester Boulevard, and I aJ 0) 0� 0 0 N 'O U O 'CS H X ET goes beyond what I'm going to call the existing driveway - W O to weasel around and be illegal and all these kinds purpose of the median is to disallow that left turn in. So it will be I'm sure. As I see the median it seems to N (0 0) (0 (. CO 01 O e-I N 01 C N end so that people can turn left. a) 0 U 0 as z° 4• 44 0 0 °t 0 4J HI a) U 44 o HI a) 1) v ro 3 N a r c" O 4-)HI w al 0 C.) 0 CHAIR SAYOC: speaking it would be helpful if the landscape architect did little bit about that, yes. talk to us a 0 J-) a) a) 0 a) u 0 u •n U 0 cn a U those in the audience, I only have one speaker card, so if a card. And if you could introduce your landscape architect. If I could backtrack for a second, Condition of 0 X )-) 0 A 0 5 4' 0 U O a) •I 14 � R) $ 0 in 4-) 0 ro o 3 •�1 0 4-) N x $4 as aa)i (1) 4A-) U 0 '0 rt g 0 34 U) H o H) a) A H 4-) 0 0 0 0 w ro )1 4-5 R1 3 0 Approval #103 do isn't going to be backing up into Winchester and those N 0 10 0 0 0 " '0 ) U ) 0 3 Hi w Hi )4 00) U N N w 44 •01 4-)) a 4 N 0 0 q 00 0 c° z m 3 0 a 0 HQD 4-1-1 4 4-1 0 0 Hco H H u D 'I E w x 4' rn, H U ni 4) 4 a) 0 as 0 o a p Ch (0 H A p tr, b •0 >0r P) H A a 0 41 � w,g N N (�7 a n (Af) OH q 0) � b C70 .-i O H .41 0 a, w ,o- a 4 44 ° C.)HI 0) A 0 0( H x ro 0 0 ri N f•') P 0) l0 r m 0) O 'i ( Nrl N rl N )0 r CO 01 0 .i N 01 G' 0) rl r) .-1 rl rl NNNNNN 44 0 A • (4 H 1 O f0-I 0 A5. I) 4.),4) 4-1 0 N D •0-I 0 0 m HI HIRI1) 0, C 4-)• I 4 •.1 4) to ro 5 N N .0 04 A ro '0 H a) 0 A ro 4) 0 +) a) Pa •-11 A 3 .[ 1) ro m A U •.1 H +) y I> 0 0 ro al I I:,' N F' 0 .-I 4) a) 0 in H 44 •.-I 0 11 0 4) m 0 w 0 0 .4) a) 0 I7 0 0 0 v '.4 .4 0 0 ro 1) a) 0 0 N U n. )4 0 a) 0 Cn 0 .. W o 0 44 G) m r4 0 l FC N C.)N 4 0 0 H cn H a) 0 0 U 0 ro $4 0 0) 44 A 0) .H 41 al 0 N I did have one other question and that is I noticed on the site plans that where the service areas are for deliveries, cafeteria, et cetera, ro U 11 0 m +A) 0 ro '0 .4 ro a) m 0 0 0 0 • O a) a) H '-I ro U 0 3 41 4) •4 you walk us through that? Sure. Bob, why don't you speak to 4'. +) 4 a-) so that a truck can be in it but another truck could pull up alongside it as well. This isn't a depressed H N $4 44 A U A 4 to +) 54 14 0 0) 44 •a) )4 U 4 0 4) H 41 • N .-I C 0 40 0 4 34 4-1 is X A >) 44 4-) 0 0 A ro Z�vii 0 .0 0 0 so that's in exactly the right spot for most of what comes to the project. N N P N l0 r CO 01 0 N .N-I N ..4 H 01 CO .4 N N N N N N 0 w w N x N � a)w m 0) 4) a 0 4-)0 a 0 ro w +, N w w 10 N •.1 4-) N 0 0' 'd nJ 00 b. N U N O w w N 14 o N o w N D m .1i y A w 0 4 [ a o 3 d 4) Ti w N }.) 0 4) S m N ,q '0 co o 3 +) N w w m o ri 0 a 0 3 .q w Li 14 w N w m 0 N v 0 qq o 4,C E N 4-1 Ti W 0) w o A U o 0 r) Hw N ro N 0 P w N 5 a '0 4, c The trees along the perimeter, as Bob mentioned, are part of the existing landscape, they're part of the 01 3 0 4-, 0 ;0 ro x ro 4.) ro w N w V) N ��' x w oo 0 Li 0 fit 0 0 )n f 3 U .0 U 0) .0 w w 0 +) 0 A ro o o H q 3 0) 0 w m � 4, w +) X to w o ro C w 0) � a X 4 w ro N +4 0 01 ' ro w 0 H N � 4 O w 44 V N O '0 •.-I 3 w N ro ro R w 3 ro w fact we're holding the curb line. This parking, that hasn't changed; we're holding the curb line exactly as is and at So we feel that all of the arborist's comments August 1st set of drawings, I believe, so he was looking at to some extent a slightly dated tree disposition plan, where that curb line was sitting along the front of the project, and I can go through each of the tree areas that �-, N M1 v N 0) r CO 0) 0 04 0 01 m N (0 r CO 01 O .-i N (+1 C 0) 04 i1 - .i - •, •, ', ., N N N N N N he talked about. w b .o R, H 3 H 0'CS 44 21 m w H +4 8 -'-1 oEEn 4 ) 0 $ 0 0 N 0 0) 0 w 0 0 0 w a)o >, 0 N 4) 8 ro +) 0 N .0) W 0 �w +) C N W 4) H 0 2 1(?') a) 0) 34 0) P. 0 1 a a ro 7• Li A q O 4.,01 ro N 0 .4) a) 41121 s 4 U 4) w X ro 4-I o w C. 0 0 ro 1 0 0) 1) 4-I X OMM you're going to be doing at Phase One. Okay. So not to repeat too of what Bob said, but as a big picture concept for the whole 14 O N N w 0 N Pi w A 0 0 w w N 0 1 0 N given the 550 mature trees. As part of the initial conceptual layout we worked closely with the architects positioning buildings, looking at roads, looking at circulation, and how to take what is currently trees along existing streets in the existing campus layout and make them feel at home in a )/) U ro 1~ ro N Li 'O 0 .r1 w 44 w U 4-' o .4 m +) 0 1 N No +) .a w 4, it ' 14 0) 0 -'4 o .w1 0 0 4N 4., Li v 4 ra 4-1 o H R4 � X N o o C 4.) O that sit in some of these breakout spaces off the end of some of these arcade spaces. There's a significant oak here and then bringing the road in along here to save this large .-, N )+1 C N )O 1— CO 01 0 N 0) N N N N N ro m b 3 0 0 4-) 0 4N ) N +� .1 A to 0 a.) r1 • II rro) a) 14 a) n, N T.A 0 a a) m +1 0 x m 0o N 0 44 4-)a a) con ) '0 0 )4 aa)i 4-)0 0, 73 N a) A m q 4 u_ a) .4.1 d x 0 a) .4 O E a) P., + 4) P 44 > A Hni 'U W 4-1 '0 N 4 Si 4-) 3 O U aJ F0 G Hi 4) 4) a) 44?) o m ro '.-1 4) because of this jog in the road here, we're capturing them a) 0 o o r0-I cn o o 3 A a) 4-) 4) o 0 a) ro 0) a) 0 14 m '.-I- I 0 ro O 40)4 t) ro N ro a) Y 4a 0 0 O .4 4) ro N N there. So there at. He shows 14 trees here that he was feeling would be a) a, +�) 0 14 HI I 3 10 tr ro 0 a) HI 3 U 01 d A 4 0 (' " 4-1a 3 3 cn 0 0) 0 .11 ro ro w ba) 0 U aS HI A 4), b 3 o �� A 44 0 q m A N N U a) O, 'O is we were showing on our tree disposition plan that all of 0 G ro a) $4 .I cn 0 A 0 4) 44 51 0 41 ..-I HI 3N 0 0 0 HI N N v .1 N 0 3 m ao D 0 o P .q m a) 0 4 04 .-1 •r1 1) 0 •D 0 G N 34 • 0 ro 3 3 N 4 x 3 a) N H 4-) 4) 0 N 11 A O G U a) 0 0 H N 4 'Ci •r1 H . x 0 a) a) 4a O N • N N o U 3 4) a) 0 N 00 u0) N S.' PO 4-) 0 0 4) -.4 a) asa) in a) 'O a) V) p a) .)) 3 0) u° 4 5" 4 conifers to help screen the corner of that garage. So we've been progressing the design to pick up all of these discrepancies on the trees and we feel like they're all 0� N w 0 N U) \ N 44 U N -4 co oo H m1° cn " E 0 ›, U ro C4 3 a cn 0 O C7 I N o O O) a a) N H 4k b -P rtl � H .-1 N M C N h CO 01 O. .-I N M V' u) h CO 01 O rl N M C I!) r-1 .i 1-1 H H .-I. H rl ri NNNNNN Some of the trees that he's speaking to, for w N '0 3 U a) .4 .4 E H —5 3 x U a) 0'4-1 N of 0 a) u �0 3 N 4) u 44 0 4a o 44 0 H N o ,04" '-I 44 a) w ill 0 the ,grade drops away that we're using to preserve that, just suggesting for appropriate health of the tree and shift that wall 6-8'. I think in given that they're cedars and O In G 3 3 0 0 N n 0 0 that case he was saying all of that by moving this promenade 3' to the north, so we n m 0 a) A o b) o H. N V) 4) 0 HI as •.4 A D a) 41 0 3 ro N a) o 0 +N) 44 m +) A P W 0. y a a)) >, +) '.10 0 4 54 N 4.) x w a) 4--,Qy v 3 A V 0, 0 N co O ri -P O N 4J 3 p 44 a '0 a) ro m •.a)i. ai 0 'o 0 , 44 0 a) q 71 a) `[ G W N 4-1 0 0 44 4-, a4) qO w 9 2 + 0 3 a) 4-) 0 Noy0 H N0d •N N H N , r1 O NNN 0 b 4-' W 4 R, 3 a 4 � A 0 4-) ) cn '. 0 0 1-1 o o 0o ro ccc)nA a) N �0�j 4 4-13 o H ro 3 0 ui a) (T 0 >, 0 51 0 H 4-I N H1:4 N.{ 4) 00 N a) .0 •.0 o -N ) 0 0 44.) 0 A, � 44 A 4 id 0 id 13, 0 A • a) �' _ _.u)_.. N _ _ In.. _ 0. 0 ra 0 • >, 4, 4 0 0, 4 ro '0 0 N r1 ro 4-I N ro A 44 ro A a) ro 0 ro A 0 a) this road ali that point, or it was finalized just prior to that drawing In a) ro q N H a 0 O V) N N °J 3 0 4a ZO 0 H 44 HH E 0 U 0 0 O 3 H z� a CAI 3 0 O y0) ELo a C-7 rl 0 0 O a N m P ri N M C u) h 0 01 0 H H .Mi H N CO.Mi NNNNN N m (6 a) 0 •.b i ) u w 7 0 a) 01 • ro m o o .0 4-) >, +) H 0 a) 0 al • o u m X m0 ' m 0 HI m 'o •.I 4-1 0 m ri v 4-1 0 m a) to 4-) 3 3 +) m >, 0 s u N o m +) a) 4-) a) o a) 3 a) A) A + 4-)0 4-)3 u N A .Hi 0 a) a) a) ro 0 m a) 0 m m 4-) m 0 to co m 0 44 x � N '0 , N o ) •� a)U ro ro m 0 ro what it would look like from Winchester. a) .6) •.i H +) 01 Ho m 4 o co •.1 +) a) a) wFr, 3 m A 44 o XH 3 a co O )-I a7 • �[4 M m V wo H co 4 '0 0 a 0 .F. •.-I 00 Cl.) 0 u) 0 ( H 0.ro OU o 0 U O mQaN 4 X A v m m 0 A a) 0 tr +) So then I'll just when you look at the civil drawing, the iteration that believe the arborist was looking at, the objective is to 0) •.i 0 44 u 0 ag 3 tea) z3 3 f0 +) '14 -1 4 ro •0 A ro N a-).H-) 00) U W •1-1 01 N 0) ro .0 •� 4) •k b U 0 -.4i N O m a) +) a) H +) a) b) a) a0) 0 rri rt 0 tr.X a) 4 44 •.4i ate) 0 0) b) b) 44 H •.-1 01 3 a U as is H ' 4 m 4 H 3 RW 3 0 ro o m a) m ro X 4 o H o N 4 .� H3 � v q i 0 H 4 N CL A 0 t7 b) as .4 U N b) H 14 4-I A 't7 a) as m o 4) 0 .0 4)) +.) ..1 existing there was an overlap and I think the arborist the curb line back, interpreted that as they want to move and at this end of the project that translates into 2' and .i N M V u) (0 N M P N .r) H N H N l0 O) ti .�-I O .I N M C 0) N N N N N N 0 0 •.1 .4 a-) 0 co u as > a) U N >, .0 X H m CO E $4 H o a) 1-1 0 a H Crlz m� laE o U o z o >4 O VI en en E a Z H o M o about the trees along the curb line on Winchester, and I'm 4 rri N a) u CU N •.4 44 m w o 0 0 ro A >, o > i m 4-4 ..j Uyam') 0 3 O X L1 as CO •n u ro to 1: X 0 0 if that helps you. Maybe flip to that on the screen. It's the site I I've been to and how you're going to position the buildings. But the m a) a) H 44 0 A m O H v A 44 ro .)) 0 m a) a) a 0 N w .p along Winchester that are higher than the building, they are taller, and I did not see where the current trees were going to be higher. However, if you tell me they are, I because I know that terrain is very uneven. But believe it, then when I read in the arborist's report that he is m to 4.{{ ro v 3 ro H ami w N m 0 CO 04 Ea .4 o o U 0 4I a) o "ro a m.{{ >, •r1 o 4 0 •.i U m 00 N -.i U +) x Si i-) +) 4 ro A 4 a) a) .0 3 o )4N 00 a 0 3 .[ the depiction on A-8 the current trees? See how they appear to be taller than the buildings, and so they're really screening Winchester? a) 4 O a) A +) +) ro +4) a) b m H H ro 4-1 u ro H 4.) H m X C7 00 H 44) 0 0 0 0 4 3 N Actually the most accurate that's behind you that shows the photo simulation from Winchester at eye level looking back into the property. The top two images. One is from Aventino and one is directly CO a> O N M C LA) t0 N 0) O rl N M V '4 ' V) �-1 .i .i .-) beautiful fall color, but deciduous tree —that's going to take a little bit more time to achieve the canopy, so our preference is to keep the existing tree and shift that Chair, if I could just ask one more question, and this is just for my own elucidation. The olive trees that are proposed for the w HI 0 44 0, 0 ro r1 V) a 4 H }w1 H w a) 4-1 51 W .44 p 20• 0 o, a) 0 0 .� 1-) HI 41 P, 3 o >1 H pt)0 4 ra , 1CI a1 •'N1 HN N b4 1i H w N � 0)A x w m A ,s; O H A C N 0) 0 c4/) N U "3 44 co 11 •r1' a) 0 a) ro o 0 D 3 0,ry' 0H 4 0 0rn 0 .. .. w ' 14 fro) 1� 3 cn H 0 .F a) wca H ro a gV a' 0 a OH 0 4) A w w a) p, .4 ro w '.4 N ,0 A ca a 4 4.) 3 g H q rd 0 0 N b 41 51 41 3 N 04 A A 4) 44 ro A >4 q 4) w O0 HI 0 HI N 3 alleviates that mess. There's a thriving business of olive trees coming out of the Central Valley for projects like o o A O r0 0 A A N 3 A • u A )4 4 a o 0 m o m 0 w u S V 0 0 n p .i 1-1 A al A, specs. But the value of that tree is instant character that w b ri w N 0 `4 U N CO zoo H cn H H E 00 > if, t7 � H 4J b) A cn O o 4 fl 0 CJ 0O1 a N 0) 1) H ri N M. C al 10 r CO 01 0 .-, N .i ri N N 0 f4 co 01 .i ri N •i ri N M C u) N N N N N would impact the roots, but in fact we're definitely not doing that. the tree stalls, and initially we laid it out just to balance out the parking in the sense of parking stalls, but given the arborist's report where he's indicating some of those trees, the roots actually stretch into those existing islands, we don't want to shift a) • q a) '0 0 w m 4 o . A ro o 0 a 3 A •N a)A N{ 00 14-) rR 0 N o w o 1 N d 44 b) A.) A'. H N 04 44 •. 0) 44 0 U 4-, 0 w w x. a) 44 3 0 ro H 0 HI ON 3 ro tn 0 a) o aa)) 3 )d N A X H 0) r-I ro C. b) b H 0 3 w .4-1 +A) 44 5 A 0 4'.) o w •.4 A w 5 04 A44 0 o 3 w H ro w 3 ro u aJ G ai 0 A w 0 w z .51 as 0 1-I 1) .4 •r1 0 •.-I 0 >1 .4' w w 0 41 (1) 0 0,A b) 14 0 3 H x •-0 N UHI i 0 0 0 al co 4-) N 1)43 A a) 3 0 4-4 c •44 w 4-) N L1 )4. 4) w 3 o 0 0 3 4-)G .4 p o w o . 0. b q 5. _ 0 w u 44)) 0 1 0 N 44 4.)) 8 ich is why we want to go back 41 H • ro • O O 0 .-1 0) w 0 a) X .4 m o 0 a H A 0 a 0 0 V N 4.)CD 01 0, 01 A 4) A +) A w 124 0 u 4.)) `o 0) 01 0 •a 0 A w w a) 3-1 t0 a ro tT N 0 a) 1 N- —b- 0, 0 .0 3 Pistache is what we have proposed, it's a deciduous tree, r1 N M C u) 40 r CO 01 O 'i N M a N LD r CO 01 O .-1 N M C N ,y ,� H ri f{ .-, .i. r, rl ri NNNNNN should happen to one of the perimeter trees, those are H H H ro 0 8 to .4 ro A 4, U a) H 4F 3 S 0 H 'O o 44 al o y' H S A 4 M 4a N A 61 •-I U q H a m u ro N 0 H 4-' COMMISSIONER TALESFORE: Not very tall, Well I think the challenge with N A a a) 0 0 4-' .ro H ro x 0 ro a) a 44 H N 4i a) 0 U al A 0) 4.) 0) 4-) 0 O 14 H a) v .4 44 was to be damaged. Obviously we have tree protection specifications that go into place, but the inevitable can N tT N b+ � 0 ai +) G 'O 0 A u 0 0 0) '64 ) H a) 3 N 5 0 O 4ro4 4-) 0) A 0 4 a 4) 4-' 0 14 H ro) a ro J-, a O A m H 00 • b m 4a -11 [ o N 4 0 0 A 4) 'd N .. 0 a) 0 y 0) "3 am.) the tree pushes forward more towards Winchester, challenge would be to get a box tree in and a 60" box 4-1 0 4-' H .'4 a1 00 .H 0 0 a 0 4-1 4-) 0 '4 H U 0 a) A H 0 0 4-I ro 0 0) 44 H all, because of the size, and then to find an available m 0 '0w a 3 4, 44 H '3 O 0) 0 W O 30-I •,'-1 a) N • -11 0 4-.)ro 0 H 3 a H .. , 44 a 4 O 440 H 'U W 0 4-) a) 4 Va 4 H O z c'• H H 0 A H b 4-) 1" '0 �" ro o 0 4 4-) 3 0) a) 01 0) N H 0) 0) � w° it behind. N l0 w 0 5 H H ri N o N U N 4i H m,,3 00 O ul H H E O U N t9 $ z„ H �., A co Pc O E U HI c O °` a , N N N H .i N (•') P if) to r 0) O1 O rl N 01 Cr N to N 00 01 O N M r1 N N N N N works with this Mediterranean feel. We feel like it is worth pursuing those trees in that application. speak to the pavers real quickly, I 0 0 rl a.) 'o 4-) m '4 0 0 a) a) 0 4 0) 0, +0) 0. 0) 0 3 a) ro 4 H 0 U ro w o 04 4-, aw 0, 4-1 .4 O •.0 -1 O tT 4.) 0 q -� +) O CO) X H C. H A .-I a v3°0 4 0) 3 4 ° 3 A N 4Ni 3 0 4) a) 3 ro x 4-) � ro 0a S ro )0 0 0) m A a) 0 a 4A A N 0) 4-1 0 (4 0) ,4 44 A 0 0 a) v 0 0 A H H 0 • { U + ro S ro 0 0 b paving. It would be unit pavers, as Bob mentioned. It would be imperious. They. could be sand -set, but they would still be imperious because of the Class Two base of the sand, and that way we could treat those stripes with like bronze domes, something that's more elegant that really speaks to front door entries, so it's not a painted white stripe on a H a, 4- 0 0 U 0 U ' a) 0) 4, N A 4A-) H 3 3 0) 4-) ro 4 U 4 O � al v, H o ro a H a) 7 O 4-3 a i ) 4-) U N 0 entry parking. N u. •.i a) 0 N 0 4-)• 40) 3 a) >+ a) a) 4 ) x t) 0 N 0 U q H 0 0 t! +) > z) 0 H 44 H ) H 0 cc) a) [d 0 Fri0.j 0 0 0 G. • H w mW8 u HH W(I) U) l/) CO U) H E H E O U aa)) O A 0 41 o w° u) 0) 0) . .H fla) o U o being credited with obscuring some of the view of these 70' 85' buildings, ko p a) o U al ect U N 4: 44 co a o0 .,� H O cn 4 cr •rl H H Z O 44 4-1 C7 3 H z 2-i r7 pi O o CD H I � o O ° a , H .-1 N 0) C 0) lD r CO O) O N ( 0i N (0•ti 0) 0) 0 N M P 0) '~ .') ti NNNNNN Sure, I'm happy to do that. As I 0 3 N A u m 0 a) 0 W H H P, '0 PGN • ui 4-1 N U O ,1 U o ,00 +) 0S 0 .0n 0 N b 0 a) °o 4)) u +N) tea) a m 0 Pa 3 0 H „ ro N . 0) N N 0000g 0 ro 1) 0 tT U N 124 � u 0 n garage. Along the back the majority of the run of trees are 4-1 Hi a) v-1 4a a) o N a) ro •-4 x „ m 0 a) ro 0 ro a) 1' '0 V) A ro .H. „ In 0 4-) )-1 C, A•) 4) 4 ro a) N E. 0) 0 In N N 1') 0 0 N A ao) v 0 ° -4 0) w O1 0 0' 0) MD oO SIA '0ro PO alm 0 A d (/) 3 3 O N rt N 4 4-) ch � -P 0 N '0 0 N „ 3 A rg 0 ) •,-I •O trees. So that's a zone that's right here, a stand of 0) 0. 0 N at ro u 0 aa) 0 a) H o 0 N y, a) a) 0 0) RS H 4 03 CD al o ro 0 0 •,i (1) 3 b1 3 � A -.4 4-)O N O .4' 3-I O 0 a) 9) 0 � 3 I a) • N 44 '0 � 0 �-) .4) '� m •r1 al ,x N 3 o ro rt +.) a) to +) 4 N 4 x A rci a) aC � 0 O 0 '0 w o 0 '0 0 N u a 0) t Pistache as part of the parking lot planting. We're showing Crape Myrtles at the entrance for some color, the Chinese Pistache for some fall color, and then we're showing v 0 0 3 4-) ro • 0 .- a) e 4 N a) N A A-) 0 0 ro 14 a) 0 t A aw „0 Wr 41 0 o •n 0 o 0 N N N H 0) ul A 0 3 0 -0 '0 0 N So along that Highway 85 corridor, had you considered adding vines on the building 0 0) m N o ro 0 N In U N � \ .4 W 44 0 H o cn cn E o >4 U ro Ch z„ H A A 0 O o � C7 N O a 41 0 H ( N m a' N ,0 r CO 01 o r-1 rNi m a N lD r co 0) o HN m C' H H ,-{ H .-I H ri H ,-i N N N N N N q >+ a) '0 0 A N 0 ro -.4 0 >0. 41 '0 0 N O a) .0 U w m o 44 U 0 ro 3 cn -P w ) a) E a) 04 a +" n o H N c Ca cn H 0 a 4, 0 ) 0 •ri N N N P. a) N 4A) could put it in front of the perimeter trees. Towards the Winchester side. cn a) • as N 4-) 0 0) -d 0 A i „ 00 0 0 O N 1, D ow al w ,Ox rj E 4 8 U) 0 0 A 0) H 0, 4 H 0 ra t)1 0 X ro H you could put it behind the trees that exist? 2) >, '0 +) ro 0 a) 0 0 A al v 94 H A 3 P A 3 0 '0o O C 4-) 0 0 3 P, H 0 A 4-'0 H 0 •ri u 0 "ro N N P. U N 0 A a) „ U '0 co ai 8'x20' and then we could drop a bigger tree in there. I'm thinking that that Now could we address the I was told by ro w a w m ( C.$4Ci) w cn w ,54 cn pi 0) pi 0 PaE.w E. 0 w 124 0 u) o . 0 cn 0 ra cn 0 u)) HH 4 H H H 0 0 o U H 0 H1:4 0 a) A 0' 4-10 +U b) �. { N P. b' the architect, you have to add landscaping to that? U H 04 So can you tell us what COMMISSIONER TALESFO M a) 0 D H N rH ro N' N Cal U N u. CO yri 0 Hcn 0 a) Ury3 z a zzj 5, 43 0 rl 0 O q Url •rl 0 rn a „ c‘i N1, 3 A H 0 0 H N m C 0 10 r CO 01 O ri m ul b r D7 O1 O HN m C N H r• ,-1 N r1 ri N ri NNNNNN CHAIR SAYOC: ° $ a �a b N 0 •.W1 4 H 'O N a') al 0 a .i O, ro b) 0 3 0 m 'd° al •.I a) ro ' UI I co • I 0 u I 3 H ro of 1..� ,A A a ax 0 m ° -0 4-) 0 0 A ga 4y H o b .4 H a) _O 2 •.i a 4 )0, q W x (T) 9 o m ,4 x 4.) CO w H +) 1-1 2 N 4 o h ro u a) b) N H3 R. )n 41 m HI bl '.1 ±i )d a) a.) 0) '0 0. a) 0 1 0 +) HI W 0. •. so it's not forever wildflowers. It may well come out 1, 0 bro o o a) 0 a, m o UO •.1 —I q a) ro m G w 4-) +) 0 W 1-) 0) 1) o N HI 0 01 w x w A w rt m ro A 3 b) CHAIR SAYOC: Okay, thank you. I believe that is U CO )-1 N N a) a o ro o 4 ro m ' s1 4) o 4 w° a v° x .0 w as 2 a u 0 o G 4-1 u b 44 0) af 0 fi pO J)) , 4 •'I N 4-) q •I m O TS b a) H N . . 3 44 H .4 0 HI a°) 0 >, issues raised. Thank you. )1 -0 o o 'O 0 0 4 b 0 ° A H 4,0 •� 4-)• 0 11 co'4 a) GF j 4 0 a C) g m as o N H b, a) W a, J." N U N N m 44 m 0 '� ro a, '1 'U m •.I o N ••di •.-i b) G H 00 W o in )•1 4 •H U H E1w qq o O W '0.03 U +O) (4 El(h 3 z r°, 3 NI 4.)) z 4 U N •(I-4A a, A P 2 >0 H b 0 d al uu) 0 ro EO o 0 2 H b) 4 0 0 _ 0) •.I 0) a H m ° x 0 h C.)o q 0 ..') +) A a) 4k 4) '0 •4 4 4 +.) •.'1 +) H 0. '0 0 0) m N b r W O) o .1 ) ti 1') N ,k0 r CO 131 0 .i N On rn 11) •') `� •'� N N N N N N 4 0 3 .4 H o )-1 0) H +4) ro b ro 0 0 a 44 '0 •.i rt .4' co as° 0) u a) +) (1) a, o H 4 alo 0 m a '0 4 a a) W U) U '0 1 +% .[ '4 0 ro�1 3 3 U +) b •.i .4 4 H U 4-1 q W b ate) cro) 4 +A) .4 2 b a) 0 2 b) H q +) a) a) W a) .1 al 4 a) .1 .4 3 A H 0) w o 0) as TS z ° a 0) u 0) 0 2 1�) TS fl N 4 3 H cr,�0 Ca O 0 N W ro .) HHg `24 3 a 04 4.)) u 0 Cs co 0 , 3 a) •.I ,-i o N '0 0 •rd-I N u 0 •3 0 ge hope so. That's sort of the major entrance to our town. I would rather see COMMISSIONER TALESFORE: And that's how tall? a) .4 aJ W 0 0 v 0 0 w 3 >, H 4 CD •.i •�.I 4 +) 'ts 0 N a 0 •C m m k 0 HI q 0) a 0 A 0 O '0 4.) H W H TS TS a H d a a) ww A m 0 2 4-) 0) (4)co 0 C.) Eco 0 4-)4 a o a v tn F W N o kay 1) 0) m a architecture and dark is that with the trees in the fore it's in the shadow in the back being dark, if you will. So some of the architecture and the landscape plan coming ., N P1 m N ,0 r W ON 0 .1 N 0) C u) l0 r CO 01 0 1-4'� "1 '� ""� , .� .I rl rl N N N N N N . a) It says that the final landscaping design will be not deferred to a later date. If I the grading proposal. 0 O proposal, not as part 0 Of 0 +) 3 4 N o 0 114. 01 0 b x m 0 IJ o ro 0 3 1 r-i o of III 0) rl ro ri 3 N • U 44 0 ocn w u A ro U 41 0) being approved, so I suggest that you continue the item so that all the plans and all the reports can be brought into b m ro � 0 I, O (0 go a) H ').1 f 41 0 0 1•�) 0 '4 to ro o 4) 0 of 4-1 0 44 ro 4 N +) N o F' a) u aa)) .1 0 H ro 4-) 0 H 3 W 3 d) A H N ro O O LH 0) o 0 at least balloons go up to see the height of these O 0 a ro a) ro a) f1 N O 0 N 0 of 0 o 0 w to HI HI 0 A 0 point does not really give you the impression from all over, and clearly those trees are not as the buildings. N 0 0 N H N c`• 0 0 HI 4-4 0 0 01 • 0) O o •� H Quintana. The next speaker is Leonard Pacheco. Good evening, ladies and LEONARD PACHECO: • ro ro b) 0 S) P, 0 q 0 3 ro NI a) la ar A a) 0) N a) 3 m C H a) W H. -44 a) to I'm a little amused by the characterization of the building ri N M C N 4) h 01 01 O rl N C N CO 01 O .i N M C ry H rl .i rl rl N N N N N N N there really are three areas that we are allowed to look at 41 0) 0 0 0 of 14 4-44 - a) v 4-)Frog o 0 4-1 r ' '4 HI RI g 00, 3 I 0 1) Cl a) U) ro a 6a H H ro � 2 14 H � N °I O. '0 a 0 H 0) ro 4-) tonight: materials, The first Hi, glad to be here and talk to you again. Thank you for listening. I'd like to open by saying that most of the people who spoke at the last •r'I +) a) 0 m P o Ll A a 4-14-) sr o m N o +) 0 •0 —4 0 [U U U 0) m 1, •(1 ro rn 0 0 A N 0) ro Maybe I just like to beat my essentially a done deal N ro 3 the wall. head against parameters set were so close? In my shoes there's still too V 0) 44. HI HI 14 1-' N 011 A q 4-1 ro m '00 0- u a) 0 m 4-)) ' 0 4) 0 �N N 3 rt 0 4) Ti0 HI 0 0) v m H 4-)0$ al ro o b) 'd 41 4-)) 0) a O' 4) Poa P 0'0 C] 0 A .A ro v v " I, Hi v 4-) r0 RI a) a .0 A 3 m � 0 to +) a) 0 .0 b o 41 0) 3 0) fro1 0 31 (1) a rn () a) 0 ro 0) w .3 0 0 ' H 4, 4-13-1 Ctl ° H. 0 0 0) a) know what it's going to look like. There are still changes going on with the architecture, and the PD permit itself, N V) HI tr) 0) m •I 0 0 0 ro O '0 i it O A) a) \ \ to $4 N U A A A °D z H 0 3 O A0 01 U G H H d s M w O ai N 0) 4 C.)0 4) 11 Vi Hz A. '4 0 H a A a + HI a) g m 0 to 0) 4_i U 1 N 0) U 0) •rl 0 00 a , N 4 N .-4 .I 4k I +) of -4-1 . A H_ _ A 0; Condition #13, says N M C N \O I- co Ot O ri N M C N lO N 0) O ri N M C N r1 .-I ri ri ,-I r' , ri , H N N N N N N and I understand that. 0 4) O ( N N co 3 a-+ 0 0 O 04 .� p1 4) H W H 14 ro C 0 N H •.. 4, S.' o 5 N as O 0 O is planned. 1-1 0 +) N 4 W H 0 0 C o m ro 3 4-) +) C m N q u) 0 Gi' V) 0 4) .1-) 0 0 ,-4 4 A 3 4) .. R )1 W ro m '0 ro u) 4-) N U 41 0 4W 0 N o R x 4-) C C H c 3 En A lI •0 1-) 3 Ot 0 ro 1-1 o H 4°-) 1�) 4) 0 HI 14 0 0 ro 4) D C H 4)) 4 0 1-1 4) U +) 44 w 4) .4) 40 .-1 •n 14 4.) E C ro 4) N RI .°C a 0 A m A R O yards from the stoplight It's about another 20 stoplight at Wi the stoplight of Wimbledon to Lark. Now there's going to be a stoplight at University. This is a stoplight mess. I e 0 0 0 W O A 0 X C O Now the traffic people will tell you this is not a big deal because it's going to be synched. Yeah. sioner O'Donnell is actually is two different things. Co 0 0 4J 0 W N s) 4) • 0 ro 0 1) ro 1, 0 O U about it. People park along Winchester that go to Courtside, on both sides, and this thing is going to be an .i N M c N l0 r CO 01 - 0 .~-i N It) lO 01 0 ,-1 N M C v) ri N N N N N N anything, so really it doesn't reflect the Town character. But besides that, 14 N ro a -) U O) 0 11 N q N U g ro N 4-) O O 0 w4)) N 0 4) 4) 11 ro 4) >1 + 44)) A.) 'O 0 u • H 4" 0 x ro 4) U I agree with what he says. Until you see the recommendations on the final plans you're being asked to approve something based on v H ro 4-) 0 'O ro a ro u U' 0 0 4-) N 0 11 4) ro 4) N 11 0) rti S-1 w 0 m 0. E .31 b • 0 4) U 4-) u) A N 4) O 0 C U 3 C m the basic design that you're looking at tonight will go forward unless you see Larry H ro A 0 m H a 44 0 4) ro 0 0 '0 4) G.1 4) H f 11 0 '0 0 In O ' U U W This is a prime location; it's our gateway. I'm a little disappointed that the viewscapes from the Highway 17 C 4) 4) R o +) 4)) °C O CD 4-1-1 as )0 ro 4-) .>~ 4) is :. 00 o '0 o R o 4) 0) 44 0 F4' ro ro 4.) 4°) 3 0 N 0) $4 (4 0 N 0 0 vantage points you'll be able to see this project; most likely it will be a big in your face thing. So in review, see what you're being asked to do. print. That's it. CHAIR SAYOC: you, Mr. Pacheco. And the third speaker is Richard Erbst. 00 4) g C H H N o N V) U N CO 00 N H 'H E 0 0 ro ch 3 z +) H z ri N M C 0) 10 N co O) O N M N U) r co 0) 0 N M P 4 ti H `-1 H ri 'i 'i - fi N N N N N N H J4"-' o H r44 -I. 3-1 44 i 4)) 0 -40 C A "g 0 o 44 0) o O) 34 w O D o o 0 04 40-) •n O 0 0 0) 0 N N •U I,' 01 4 H '0 c Ci A 44 •0) 0 ° 0) 0 0 xt 4 4-1 1 •> C N H 44 4.) ro x 0 _ aCi ro U +) H 0) 3 14 A 3 X u H ro -) o 14 0 0 + a)) 8 N H a'ti 0) 0 4) O 4.. 44 44 N N 0 •4 44 H you will, at the front, et cetera, and we consider those go his way. We're still studying where is that best solution, and we'll continue to do that. Obviously if there 4-) 0 0) 4-) 0 1 co 34 o a'. H 0) H to N '0 U AN 00)) X 0) 0 N. Co 44 A 44 N •. N 0) 4-) .0 'o 0 H >, N 4) 0) ° N N 4 q O 44 C 0 4 0 3 o H 0) 0) 4) >, 0. 0) C ro a-) 4) 0 04 0) N H H 3 '0 4-' 3 4--1 0 0) 0) 0) 0 m � b, -4-10 '.4 •° 0 N A 0 0 O 44 0 41 H C. >, )0 0) O A. 0), 0) A ' 0 >, 44 A 0 3 0 44 0) H A0 C 14 .0 ,- 0 GI N H 4 •4 0 v a;b 3 H .-4 � 044 3-) N. ,4' N N 0 44 'o functions and it works and people can flow in and out of 0 m 0 '0 0 G .4 4.1 cn • 0) pH co 0) 0 a N ro H q 0 .4 0 .H 44 44 0) ro 0 4) 4-) 4-) forgets that it needs to work for us primarily, and if it N r 0) 0 • >, .4 r-C 3 > ro 4 0) 4 4) H n 0 tcn T N 0 4-4 '0 •�-I c‘l04 .4-).4-)ro 00) ' co .X b. 4 ZO o H 3-i to N ko 3 4-4°i 4 H o ro 41 N 14 w O 0 N 4) U 0) z tT •.-I •40 4-) Hz .4" N N 4-4 O •40 a 4 H N a O 4U) O u � m (H t9 N 4-) 0 44 44 >4 N On O \ H -4 .I N H R,LH F ' o N 0 0) 0) sr, ro a)H o3 •C4 N -4-1 ri N T P .1 l0 1` co al O ri N T m T 10 f� Co Ol o r-I N M C ill ri .-1 ri rl ri HNNNNNN absolute hideous mess, and who's going to suffer from it? 4.$ 0 >, 01 14 i rt a 0 0 4) m 4-) 0) fac 0 0 (T 0 0 H to ro x 0 0 3 a° 14• 1 0 0 rl m • b 4, C 11 0 N 0 0 4) ro o a 10 0 A The visual of the trees, the landscape is supposed to hide the building. The building is you ask the question of the arborist how big are those trees going to be? A 36" box is what they respond. You have to dig it out of them. Why do you have to dig it? They 44 0 0 4J bl 4 'O 0 >0 N 0) '. 9 N H 0 3 N m 0 .H 4-1 0 0 fa, 0 b 0' 4.) 'C 0 3 them. A 36"x36" box, the tree is going to be that tall. In C ro H O 01 0 0) >r d 4) •r 0 0 'O C H >7 o .0 Tr 0 4°) a O A 4-4 u 0 0 ,N A� 01 o 44 00) 4H 0 14 '0 lifetime will the trees get to 40' to hide that. r. 0 0 •H 4.) 0) 0 •4 �>0 4) x ra 0 >, r44' H 0 W 0 o 0) a ro H U this is your last chance to speak on this item. It doesn't 0 0 4-) 0) 4) H 0 41 ro O C 0 0) N u X 0 4-) .H 0) x .H H 0 0 0 ri the plan set 4.4 0) 0 cn ri rl 4-) 4) 4.4 4, o C •r0i u 0 30 0) 4-104 0 N 0) 4-1H m •n. Thank you very much. I would like to 0) 0) 41 +) 3 p 0) y' 4 i 0 04 HH 4-) H 44 N N C4-1 ' o A 0 0 N 0 '4 o -� z0) O 'P, '4 H 00 0 U cn VI H '4 41 SA E - 0 O U ra [ cn0) w H 4 x 0 b) 0, 0) a .0 0 4 44 0 O Lo Hi HI A O 4.) N 0) O 4. 0 a N oW # 0 m 0 4) 4.) F.'. 0. H01 4P ri N M C W 01 O .-1 N M ct. V1 b r CO 01 O ,-I N M C r1 ri ,-1 ri N ri '1 r1 r-1 rl NNNNNN t +o) ro '0 PA 4 ') 0 U N ro o a) H N A o al U A .-1 H x R, 41 a) aa)) A) 3 4-) o 0 41 In o H 0 m Ul U 'CS 'O 0 4-1 a) .0 . O 4) 14 n CL 3 trucks going back and forth on Winchester would be so that a) •a 4-1 0 44 0 N N H O 00 0 00 0 U > 0 .y o o 3 o Uro N x 4 0 U )n '0 3 00q O en a) ead X 8 0 3 H N H a) o � 0 Fo) u A A w a) o 4.) H •r >, 0 4) al ZW 0 U x q A to 0 cn .a '0 Z > 0 o A IO ro ccnn N N. tP 0 A A d O o +) E 'O H 0 aa)) 0 0 U o 3 o �- .3 Paulson? z CHAIR SAYOC: so that would be required, and one of the elements that is addressed in that is CHAIR SAYOC: 0 C) N 0 a) o• I just have a question of Staff, going back to the traffic issue if I 0 a, 0 0 .0 ro ro 4-1 1~• rt a) N 'O 14 O 0 '0 a) H could. The light on Wi m m 4) a) a 0 0 X H 14 A S". 0 O X +) 0 '0 H r• x H U w 4-1 al cn N H that wasn't going to happen. r rl N 1•) V' «) 10 r 0) O ri .N-1 .Ni O' 0) '0 COri N 0) V. I() r - o '� '� '"� •') "'1 N N N N N N have one here to the degree it's interesting for you to if they do have materials they brought in would they mind g N A >1 A N 44 a) O a) n• 5 ct 4 ro F '10 N +0) 40) 0 3 H ro 0 HI 0 0) ?C R U • N A ..-1 z .4" O a) 'CS A 0) H Z 1 sal -0m 14 zo U •• 0 44 0 > N A Z tn 4-1 4) `n 0 U) cn 4) H al4 01 0 Cs/ 0 0 1) far N H °0' A +) N •n HI ro 0 •.41 [A a) O 0 •H a) a) rr-I 0) F 44 0 +) 4 2 • 0 0 0 al o a, G 4( >1 ro 0 4) U 0 14 N 4) a O A '4 A 0 N b) •5 tr 2 0 4) 4-1 0 A '4 4-) w o 'ry to U +) U 4' N a) 0 0 03-11 0 N 0 54 O C 41 'X q p Q .Hd .4-),_, U (1) •4 o G A A G E Hen U • 0 a) N NN A Aa 4-1N 00 41 'O b W 3 14 H Z 0 +A) 0 •- RI•0 •di 0 N ° N h 0 0 000 al UG -'4•rU10 + 4E NU NNUm b) N •r1 N N 0 0 g Z) 00 •.4 0 O '0 •j I would say it gets constructed once it's done the intersection is done as well. co a) 1` +) 0 a) 0 5 a) 410 4 H H H aN ro 4) ) o N � N In a) 4 N 4, +A co N ) a) 0 o OH to a) N H H N 5 E w +) N O • 0 U 3 C9 Z H H Hi z b) 0 a,vi 0 0) A E + H I b 0 rn u 4-) a a) N# U 0 (a H H N 0 IR SAYOC: .i N m 0 0) l0 I- OJ 0) O .-I N M C N (0 1� CO N O N M C U) `i '� H N N N N N N 44 0 'U .H H 0) N O a) Y 0 0) U A 0 CQ z x Highway 85; that's not going to be part of it. That signal 0 O co .4' tP 9 O ro rg ro .r{ 0 O N u ro 0 3 from Winchester. I'm just thinking about Highway 17 and the fact that many people take 0 H a 'CS a) 0 U ro .0 m H G' A qa ro H a) 11 t~ that because I do it myself, and so if that traffic light 14 4.) 4.) o 4 0.1 N .4-1 0Hu H4-1 qi 0)) A 0 as ro Hi 0 0 C0 H N 0 4 A0 +1 • P 01 U S 3 000 o 4) $4 0)) �0.{{ - a U 1 w •r01 N •o •p 3 4-1 W-4 N 0 •��i • a ea ,s4 d O emu) 4 'O( N N A .0 0 .0 W a) 0 .N 4-1 H A 0 a) 00 4) 4 • 0 H A 0) 3 0 co H .Ni H u 4i 0 0 '0 A 3 4 Po 0 0/) 0 'o.. ro 40-) H •N-1 ro a) 'O 0 ro •.-I d +1 0. U F.' a N 0 H' a a) (." asEdO O 0 H p H 0 0 H > 0) 00>+ 0N 0 0 4 �a) 0 0 P., 4wi 0 a 4) 4) a 41 .1 0 N 0 •rri 0 0 N 00 •0) n p n 44 •n N 0) 0) 0o • A H 44 H 4) 0 .rl }1 H +1 a 4H 01 '0 •Hi monitoring phases of the whole traffic corridor to kg r N H 11 >, ro .0 H (4 0 o m N • +, 0 4 N \ • Is 00 Ui z 0) HOo • H al 44 H H N 00 H H 0) 4 0) E. O Ni4 N .A." U 0 a�a 0 U �x z� H (4 tJ O N H 1[�4 0 4i 0 W .A 2 ° 0) 1400 to CH!) a) ( (p0 - kg H co CD I Ma `� 0) 0 N •N •N •l. O 0)• C.) al Ai a 4) HI ro 0 4 N q N .41 0 a) O • 41 a) o a) H H H 0{ 0 A 7 •r 3 4 +1 a) i-' 0 •n I'm sorry; I .-) N M P N 1p r OJ 0 o .Hi N M •r If)b r CO 01 0 HI N 1•) V' N H, Hi H{ H1 .i H, HI .4 N N N N N N C`- 0 H a) 0 u 0 0 a 0) x 01 x i1 3 41 0 qi 44 µ' HI rl. b) 44 4-i •HI 0 Ai H z a' H 44 0 CN 0 H, 0 0 p 44 U 0 H a) +1 w A •'+ 3 a 3 cid En H�^ 0 0 (" -HI 41 N O H CO 11 0 3 a) Uq S� i~. N x U Is all of that synchronized? N a) 0 $.1 H al 4) a, A 3 0 H m ro A 0 N a) H N .-4 O H a) >I H 0 H b) Ai 0 a 0 0 3 .1 A -1 0) '0 m 3 +' F, x U 4 .H N F1 (0 � m a) +) 0 en ro H N (0 0 n •.i k •HI 14 G a) H O N (0 U) 4) 4) U 'O O 44 4-) 0 a 0 a) 4) o .-4 4w-1 0 ts 4444 0 •HI a) u) a) •HI ro 0 0 0) al a° 4) A-,3 U p N 0 0) N 0 0 01 10 8 q •ri nHyI b $4 0i • 01 Ham, 0 N ) N pa 4-) a q A 'O a) H A. H •.1 a) HI •Hj -.4 0 3 U a) A H N 0o as U (0 P H H 0 C.)0 b wro _._ o. N •�I H Po Os z 54 al +) 0 signals the new traffic signal is at the main entrance to the project. Those four will all be synchronized to work in N N H O +1 ro s H U •HI 41 4i 10 H 4-) CA .0) H H w0 A 0 (4 8( a 0 A H }� H O 3 o 0 U 0 .0. 9 a0 •n 0 5J If I could just ask and Dell, does that belong to Campbell or does that belong N 0) A AH 4-) N N '0 �A HI N 3 co oc, H 40 HLo c) .4'H H H 0 CEl1 E W (4 H OU >, 0 PI0$ IA) H .. z m H a a eg r2x� O q En 0 H 0 H Lo a Z En H N ° II N 00.- ��..7j a, O Y U 0 10 U (4 >, a) 01-1N H 0 4 N r HI N M V 0) CO r co dl O H.Ni r1 .Ni rri rrl ..� N N NNNN N N A 1) a) •.1 • 0 W 0 0 • 1 H a) 0) O +A) 0 0 0 En 44 0) a. 0) O 0 N a) 0) 0 qoq 0 P4 A N A \ H H r1 u) •.1 a) .-I +) U N 3 0 0 U 0N C.) 0 .-I W 0 x q 0 a) H34 74 00 N 0 H0 a)tn a A 0 0 z HI Ft w4--)4.) H 0. N 41 U U N 0 H v) H R. o '0 0 0 probably 2012 or 2013 would be the earliest that that project will take place. a) A to .1 .0 41 3 E o q b) 0 a) 41 0) 0+HS W N U+sf •� at 44 N LH{ N •C U N N .41 'H0 S N 0 0 4a 4-) ro .1 .-I q H bi 0 00 F H N N � 0 4) A 0) U Et W W W W o b0 a 440 H 3 4-3)H0 i, 3 0 I X X N >, 0 41 ai .0) H N W Ix4 H 4 a) 0 u M o x 0 m H o 0 HEi a 0 H 0 z O H • 0 2 HI W O [� U 0 0) b, 41N OU N z U 0 (4 x 4 1-i N N a) 0 w "g) 0 A 0 4 E: 1-4 a) 4) >, m En - 0 u) A 8 m 0 to be built across from Courtside as we see on that exhibit H m N 0 )1 3 0 0 .q ,ppO 4-) 0 C, Cs 41 U Iv H 0 0 41 and on sheet C-2, and you come to the newly proposed traffic signal, there is 0 H 0 U VV) f1 ro 0 A +) o 0 U 0 H 3 0 0 0 O uI0 +) H 0 41 4-3 o +) A 0 (14 H b 4-4 U b) 0 0 4 ro a) A A 4-) 41 0 0 HI 0 0 A Again, there is a lot of work going on and this is a work in progress. All the details, we are working with the construction drawings. But there will be a dedicated right ti N m C IN tD h Co 0) 0 4 N m G' U) 10 h CO 01 0 40 N 0) V. 0) ri N .i IV rl rl .1 .1 NNNNNN a) U A •.1 a) 4-) 41 p, 44 0 +H) I N H N N N A A +) '0 0 a) 0. 0 p o • N 41 >, a-i 04-)) 344 4-) •.i N a) 41 A 0 41 0 +) H H H ° A N • 0. 0 +) b F41 0 0 O 4.) 0 0 U HI N 3 0 N 'U q m a°' N a) 0 U 41 0 A 0 '[)[c� ° )/) 0 H ro 0 '° A (1)1 U tr a a +.) a) 0 A 4 A +) +) +) Correct. Basically the railroad that is next to the project site, right now we have gathered through Union Pacific that they run the train will come down. Those are going to be synchronized with our traffic signals. But yes, that's going to be a A m 4 +) .IJ o •0 +A.) 0 ro E 3 3 4)) 44 +s H 0 x H •�1 ro 0 41 u) >, 0 H 0) m Ed ro A � & 0 A (Na ro - 1 En 3 4� A an •O G 4 U N U u) 3 .Hi HO q El 0 34 0 E; a) U 0 +°i aJ 4--)D 01 0 44 U) a) N a, U a 00 0. R � ..1 they are proposing Applicant through various measures that to do and the measures that we have asked them to do to 4-) a) (1) A m a) 4-) a) a) 0 ri .1 H 0 b H H 0 0 H m N 0 41 a A 1) 1-) N a) 0 a) N 41 as possible. So the egg and 41 to A A 1.4 a) H 0 41 ro A .' H 00 H U) H t7 0 .H -54 X ro rx +) z 0 0 4 � , F, 0) H ro OU 0 u) 0 ro x U A U or they're going to begin their work and then their work, r-1 N m P 4) l0 h CO 0) 0 .-i N m 4) 0 04 ODN 0 .i .i N N N N N N important project and they also think this is a project which is entitled to all deliberate speed. 0 S-I O a) T1 a) ro 0 4 t0) 0 41 a) O 4) O H a) 44 44 0 0 G O a N rd (4 4 as 4 • 4 3-1 0 N J.,o a) H 0 N 4) a) 11 to the Council so long as what they're doing appears to you a) 11 4. HI b0 � 0 0 '2 0 0 0 101 ro (4 al N a N T) 1) 0N U) b 4 rl 0 0 0 v) r-I 44 N 4-1 3g.Tj 0 41 0 •.-I 1 a N 44 a Tj 44 :4 a " 0 0 41 1i u H 4 a) TS 11 3 a)HI 44 01 4) 4 0 3 + 0 •44 ro •44 m o 44 3 A 43 44 ro 0 0 H a) 4 O•44 04.' 0 3 a) a 0 0 a) a 4-)) 3 m 4-)) They have 1 Chair has already pointed out to you, that's really three 0 4-) 0 a) •-1 a1 4i id •.i 0 4-) 0 A g R 0) 11 )) 0 0 v 0 0 0 H 0 11 0 g, •.1 >1 4-) 4-1 IN 0 r-i 0 4) ro >1 O )-I 0) N '0 0 0 0 H 0 CI .- 0 0 44 1-4• U .0H 3 3 N 41 N al .4 b) x 0 0 0 44 that is not the role left to us. If you assume, as we do, 0 0 U 43 V1 J-) N N' 0 0 U) U '04-1 .0 v 4. a) a) that it is a done deal, as you said, then we says but what's left for us? So tonight we have tried to raise respectful of the fact that the people who get elected made r1 N m C If) lfl t` CO mo rl Ni m a N l0 t` CO 01 0 r1 N m C Ifl r1 rl rl r1 rl. r1 '1 r1 rl N N NNN N 0 4) +o) l.3 •.4 0 0) a) 0 n 3 u Hk •0 a 0 4-) a) o 4-) 44 0 41 41 0 0 0 H 0 HI 0 a• 0 4 a) •rl 0 O +) 4 again, we are still as I said working with the internal point is well taken. We will make sure that O'Donnell's going to impact Winchester traffic. 0 N Ti H 0 O a) b1 11 0 H 0 N u 4Y a 0) N 0) o 4 44 as 0) 4) •rl a) ri, H 043 Y of • 0 ro N } x o Z 44 4 44 i ro $ 4.) 0 '0 • T7 0 O 11 0) 0) N .-I H 14 %' ca N. ••-1 N 41 N a) 44 fl . .. .0 >1 •r-I4-1 0) 0 U 0 q W ill 5 0 0 0 0 3 as as a) A H N >+ H H +) o •r• 0 0 .4 0 YI 0 4 7+ 'YI 0 a) rl O a) 4 4 x � a 0 0) a) a a)an zm Ia 0) u U H N H 0 •. o o w 0) 4i m 00 4 I-1 o N •rN1 .k �. 41 _.. a) 14 u 3 x q ... 4) 00 .-1 U those of you who attend these things and pay attention to project. You may recall thoughts on this project. 0 A-) TJ ro .G 0 ro 34 11 a) 4-)) O a) 1) 44 O ri 0 0 U H That's their job. They obviously think this is a very .i N CO C N 10 r CO al o .-1 N m P N b r CO m o r1 N m C It) ,� .i r-1 r1 •-1 rl r1 .i •i .i N N N N N N So for whatever it's worth, I think the people rn O �' p, 3 as O N H +� 0 +• 4-) +) o) f-I 0 N O ro 0 a) a W 4a •.{ A r-I A +-� C ro a) TS a) a) N a) b1 x H o qq0 a) }, ro ro H a) w 4, 3 0 3 w •i 0 3 N 3 v A a, 0 A U a) a) •-I N +� W rl 0 ° O C 04 H N H N 4) 0 3 N v) V) 3 rtf 0) 4-1 0 4a .0 a) a) N ,-i +� w .� v, •r� H (n U o 0 D o +) 0 al a) 1 N •rl x 0 3 0 •• 4a +) 0, .0 N .1°-) 3 A, 0 v 0 o o 3 roq • H � C 4-, C •-i z5 'o 5 4, A 3 + N m ro a) C. a•°) C a) U 0 E tT 4' �" N •4) a) ')") N O a) a) C v° o ao 0 •+) b 4.) a, C 3 u 0 q C 0) 4-) r1 a) 3 E O rt .'.4 0 at A m •. WaW ri C .0 •r� �0.{ 0 4 0 0 .) U H 3 0 2 N• •�i •ryj '0 ' 1 0 '0 x r-• b) 3 A-) .,4 A '0 H Ci ro >4 0 G ro 3 rn 3) 0 0 do N •rl C 0) 3 a) w ro N ( b m v) o ro a) p., o H ° 0) q A ro a H ca ° 14 co '0 3,, 0 H 0 9v N +) 0 N 4-) 4°-) ) ri •r1 ro a) .0 0 H u �i 4) ro N N m u o N H H N m 0 o O H .� H al al w •4) +A) q " U 3 aroi 0 3 0 •g u) •2 C a, l n 4 A b) 0 • 0 0 N 0 .4 .H 4) •>r '0 C 0 0) cn N N i) 0 H w •.4 .) C O b U 0 "-) 0 ••� C ••'-I .IN • ro •rl a) a) 0 ro �) N •rl 4a. 4) m m 0 0 0 'd o 0 ro 0,0, „i N 0 H +) a) 0) .rt m w 0 U H 3) '0 .0 (0 p, 3 N 4) •ri 3 C 4) C -0 O N O 4) 14 3 0)) 4 gro g o co 0 C •O O 0 L) C p ro •rl H N 0 .0 a) a) 10 H .0 U • (0 ° N 0 .0 H .0 a) ti .0 01 J.) y Tj .N 4) a) A •.Ni •w o A a, •1--i . A a . A o 0 +� 3 H a) r we really don't have a finished product in front of us. So v 0) (0 r 0) CO 0 ri N M .v-� N N N CO 01 0 .i N t•1 v N `i 'ti 'i -1 •'i -1 N N N N N N 3) 4) •r4 0 o 4J •-I ro a) •rl U 0)) G• -0 v o rcl N • 4-) 0 ro 3 N � a) o a) 01 0 0 "04 -CS H 0 it +°) 0 3 tp a u •-1 N N 3 rl X 0 N A 3 3 0 0 0 (4 -,-I0 4.) 00 'O •o ..-1l '0 0 +) •U 0 H '0 0 0 ro 0 0, understand that feeling, but I'm just trying to let you know a little bit about how the system works, and the O1 rl a) w '0 1 4-)) D m m a) 3 Ss 0 N 0 3 � 0 41 0 >r .0 0 0 ro •.i N 4.) a) hearing before realize that this Co in its comments. Heights of the buildings, all that kind of a) 0 O 4) .H 0 a) 0 b o 3 IIU O 4) (1) ro a) 3 N o V! aa)) 1) N N u 0 a) 3 0 U N decisions make the decisions, and once those decisions are made, we move on. So if people feel frustrated about that, C '4 a) '00 A -) u oO N qg 3 4 U .0 + H H m .0 10 ° 44 P) o •-4 o v 0 (Oa (1) •.4 0 N +a) p al • 4-1 4-) 3 4a q 4-1 A+) a) b N a) O H {4..) the fact that the architects have responded to our H N CO +) w 0) 4) 4 3 0) 0 3 0) p en cn 0) u R H 0 CU N .0 1-) •rlSA 4) N a) 3 a) \ C N a) N 4-) H (N C N 0 A" � ° 00 ',' 4-) `�i '4 H ''z H H a.) •rl H 0 U .F Oro 4 CD 14 0) U 0 J4-) H "P �2 f.' N 'IdC N 3 �4 b o 4) D 0 m a C� A 3 H a) +) a) 0 H 0 p 0) 4 O 3 C 4 ri H 0 A o H 4 a) H 0 •.l . 4) N H a) o (Ni U O 0 a) A N H i0 r�-I b 'CI .--IN O N N a, U +) 4 h H rl N M v N '0 N CO 01 0 ri N (•1 v .LOY (` CO 01 0 ri N (0 v 0) N N N N N N a) ri A HI N 0 4141 o O U RIH 4) o m HI •4ra 41 A A 0, 0 44 m 4 44 5 0) 00 0 44 PO 3-1 a,0 u o P � P � u 3-1 0 0 0 VI u) 3 AH 0 )d 0 H +) H 4-) +�) 3 0 > '0 0 ro 0) ro A 4.) a) o H A •4 N. W 0 H 0 °o •-) 4 m that decision of whether or not the intent and the a) A v 0 a) A 0 14 0 H w conditions have been met resides with A H O .41 oa) 14-1 41 HI 4 )4 0 0 4) A o o fit 4° A TS ro S HI1 '0 o +A) P a) 0 0 •�') 0 gHI j H T7 00 (1) N H 0..go 1 0) A A TS i-) a) 0. .-1 A. 0 4 oro om gH A 0 o 0 V)0 � 1-1 '0 o 0 al q a) '4 4-) n U N J+ 4-) O .) 4.) .rl a) ro lT N 44 'd G. •r41 oll 44+) A TS 4-) N Jam-) i ,ri •H-I •>1 0 O 4.) 4-4 U fa •rl 0, ✓T 0 H .. o N 44 G. q U 0 0) N .4 H .4' •-.1 0 o )mod H 0 a) 0 4.)) a ro m 4A.) 2 don't trust their actual completed plans would be presented so that people who study this report have that opportunity. Those that b TS o 4) 4 a) 0 o o 0) N > 0) 4 .0 P 01 1-)) ro o N 0 51 >°, 44 ni 0 ) 0. A .0 A ro 44 ro 0 +.) CV' 4) 0 3 A 4 o 0 u) 4 3 0 •,i > aaa) a) 0) oU u) 0• a :0 HI al 27. 4) D HI to 0 al m N ro 4 0 a) 0 44 4 x 4 U t)1 3 � 1-)�1 ) 0 a fair thing to do to the public that has been following this up closely. a) g g 4-1 >4 .0 ,-) u 0 H 0 'd a, N N H i N 4 a) A 0° 3 z 0 CD 0 0 rn c •.i 3 H H 1 a) E w 0 ro o m z 00 q o 44 a) 0 4-4 A )4 m w Hcn a +) >) �o C7 0 H 0 A o cn a , H CV 0 ' 0 N 0) 4.) a) H a) d 40 N M C IN l0 I- Co 01 O .-I N M P N ,0 m Ol O .i N M 'V' N ,y .y ,1 ti .1 r, .-1 .-I H N N N NNN a) 4) )4 0) 0 0 0 O•0 0 14 0 aa)) .11 vs0 0 0 0 HI U 0) 4) U ,410 >+ l 0 4-I P+ 4 N $4 > A a) ro +) > 44 44 O O' $ A H m a) A m0 o; '00 4-1 4 {0i. H )11 TS 0 d Y 4 U 0 0 0 0 o H U r-1 O'Donnell, for giving that caveat up front. As we've indicated throughout tonight's hearing, ted, and if 4) frustration we're all feeling. Fri •0 O a m )n 44 0 4-) Ca 0 0) m u 3 m 0 4) 4) fA decision has been made, and so we all take our role very seriously and how do we better the decision? That's where the ,devil is in the details as they say, and because we are m U (1) 0 4.) > 11 ,44 N 4) 4, •rl H • •r01 0 0 N N 1: b ro 44 0 • N q a) a) 0 u '0 4-) 4-)) 0 .�• TS )d +(11) 4 0 0 tell that that's where we've really tried to focus on how 0+ a) A TS H 0 0 U m k.) 0 0 4a 0 0 0 44 N i) A P 0 004 • 3.4 rcs at least alleviate or raise these issues to the Council a) 4.) N •ri 4 O '0 Ca 4) U TO 0 0) a) 0 ro Fa O • g44 MO4 9 • N U 0) 41 A . +°,. " N 0 x a ro •rl 0 +.) >, 0 0 a •rl O )4 0 o 0 4> 4-) •roi So that being said, if you also follow this co 4-4 co 0 0 a) 0 ro P +) RI H 0) 44 H o 4i m H N N 4„ 0 w aa) 0 •0 0 003 w p p o 4� HI H'H 0 0 E w ro a o m >o ro Ca 0) z 44 ,->i m z fib) H z .', q 0 Fa W.0 41 ( CO a • H. o 0 .) 41 C7 0 A0 0) a Q , a) 'ro N u) 41 0 0 ' 0 4-, 0 .H >°, o rl N M C u) to r CO Q+ 0 NMV. CO 01 N N N N N N left- and right -turns and the ingress and egress, that 3 k' 4 HI J-) 4.3 N N o U "o ro H O 0 a) 4 H ro 4)) N al 0 Oas .G N TS N O b Hp, A N ro 10 H x H :1 H H 4-) 0 N 4i what is in front of us. I'm concerned about the strict enforcement of the N 0 J) U 0 0 N U 0 a) N 0 0 0 H H ro HI m b 11, H 4-1 • 01 • ro tN N N N o a 4") ;-' '0 HI 0 4) HI '0 v o $ 14 a) o O a) H o trot CO 0 +) 4-) D ro '0 N (1.) a) 10 3-1 4) 0 o H 4; o TS H the replacement plan that I 36" box tree is not going to .-� N M a 0) 10 r m of this project. I appreciate it and I appreciate your efforts for maintaining it, but I want to see that plan. I The other thing, and I appreciate it also, the computer generated images that you showed tonight up on the screen and also behind us that were also in our packet. a) 4-) 4) ro 0 Oc a) A a) ro 0 U ro 0 4J a) ro O didn't show the full visual impact of the structures that I before the intersection. Winchester is a big boulevard. And 40 0 H ro o 0 4-1O a4 O U H t1 a) H HI 0 O .k EI N 40) N U 0 H 0 m 2 01 • z o° 0 m rC E w O U H � 1-1 f o -4 H 4) N 2 b w o 4 u N b W A N O D 'o H ko ro 6H 4 0 O m H o a ro •- #k N 03 4 0 a) O 40i H 14 •'01 01 O .-i . N M rn 0) 10 r 01 01 O rl N M C 0) 01 01 01 01 01 N - •-1 N N N N N N anyone at this point, but I would find it very difficult to ssioner Talesfore. front of us. Co 0 x ro H Thank you. This has been •• '0 C4 01 W N N H 14 H o H m 0 cn H Ca g W N 0 O 0 an interesting project and one for had before, and scale as it relates to the architecture and the site ro provisions that we see in front of us, which really X 4) r1 .4) H there not here, that 5-1 ro w 0 cn a a) a) a) 5 H changes that haven't been able to review it in detail because they're 0 H [1 0 .H a-) a) 01 0 J-) J-) 0 H ro .H H A H H u a) 4) 4i 0 0 O 3.4 W 11 +) 0 q I'm sure you're all for those of you in the audience, how does this comply with our General Plan vision for land development to protect the character of Los Gatos? I had to the people that are interested and I say that to respect know. We're trying as hard as know that -) N M P 0) '10 r CO 01 O 01 N M rn Ln 01 O N M v) 0) r m r-I fi ry N N N N N N with the traffic impact and now the evolving Winchester the question of well, wasn't it Shakespeare that said, 0 .0 4 o P. H P 0 HI P 4 44 ro 44 4--.4 0, H 3 x 0 ca A 3 0 44 a) O .4 4 N X 4J 'o x ° 4J 0 • 3 `� . HI H 0 4 0 N a to 14 H tf' 0 0 4) 4 w o d v •.-I ro 0 •0i 0 N N C. 'o 0 IP 0 3 A 0 worlds. I don't want to further complicate this procedure believe that this H • 4 0 .H cd 0 .H H 0 0 0 A 4) 0 14 4a 4.' .H 4-1 a) 4 0) .4 0 4 3 will go before the Council on September 6th. I happen to believe it will be approved on September 6th a) • I 4) HI a �0 8 o d 1) o H HI 44 A 0 HI 44 4 •-1 3 'O U •41 O a 4 4 N a) N ro O� 4-) 0 HI 4 O 0 CD 3 3 3 0 4 H i) 0 a, 0 N a m easy to say don't think that would really help anything, so I would H like to think that tonight we can pass along our thoughts, 0) .41 o 0. 0 P7 o V, 4 m o 4 HI N '0 •to N u)08 o H O O 4 14 0 H U P, 0 cd N H 0) 474 00 .0 4-1 N o 4 4 0 3 h that we add to this on a positive vein will be indeed us, and that doesn't a) a) 0 0 a) 0 O rl, 0 0 H 14 0 N v1 a)ro ai N 44 0) •4 ,_, u) U) c 4 8 0 O o H o CSGam'. H M 3 E w o H � 0 0— ro 1-1 a) x 44, H (4 ro 0 m v P H +) o 3 H ;CI 0 'b' 0) 0 m N A. >, i_, o .o 0 w HH ro 4 4J m 0 o� o 0 H ch u) H 444 a) lq rn. O a, f�� U 0 0 #k > �� N 1n 0 rd d '4 H .O 4 '0 oo co .a N N o• of b r to (3) O .i N �) V' of l0 CO 01 O rl N H .-1 rl ti N N N N N N The challenge here has been to make a reasonable o HI 0 ro (4 . 4 0 3 3 a-) )O A x N 4 4 0 b) 0 +) ' 14 O 4� 4 N 0i 0 b 4-) ' `✓ 4-) HI 4) 0 A H 0 14 44 i O � 0 A I V - 'cd o ro 3 0 I i) 4) 0 '0 4a '°o rely on: the story poles, balloons, more computer generated images or a facsimile thereof. 4 ai .� H '0 0 N O H 0 It 4N 0) � •3 HI 444 HI3 A 14 0 4-) 4) a) w 0d a) 14 3 0 r b) 44 4 0 • •41 4 0) 00. N .8 P. 0 H 8 8 8 0 0 0 0 a '00 00 0 44) HI 41 4 H 0 0 0 0 O •.4 4 4 a) a) a, A 3 4 I m 44 0 .-I H H 4 co a) .4 0 o -P 'd 0 3 o H 0 44 ,-4 0 ,4 O •.�I 44 �{ cd y�i w O H a) ro 3 00 44 0 0 b 0 4) 0 0 0 0 u •0 ro 0) �° a) a i 0rd HI A � 0 0 0 N 'o u) 3 COMMISSIONER O'DONNELL: It is interesting that consider it on the 24th and they would consider it on 1a ro a) a) 0) (` _ 0 co 0 0 0 '0 4 a) +) HIw a m 14 a) Ir 0 +) '0 a) 4 H o 4 4 ° O N 4 I aco ; zo 0 tn 4 '0 4 o mod. •d o + .4 m CA H0 H O 0 b a) 4 0 U '3 a) 0 4 0 4 H P o o z m .4 z a 0 H •4a 44 44i .3 a1 r_ia 4-) as0 rn O a) ✓. u) N H H 0 +) '.4 •.i (5 ,1 •-4 HI H I • a) 3 44 .0 0 rn b0 N H H N 4 q 'd N x #k u ) •• ° .0 N 4 0 N 3 4-) 0 0 A _ 4-)HI H i .i N m V of l0 r CO 01 o rl Ni f•l CO 01 0 .-1 N (0 V. of r-, - r, .4 .a N N N N N N I think that could be used closer to the the native Elderberry. a) creek as well So those are just a couple of suggestions that I think would add as we transition in the next phase closer on the planting plan.. for overall, I understand that this is would look like, but it would be nice if the meadow that 44 0 a) N 4a N ro u 0 0t 0 a.) N 0 ro 4-) m N a) H a) u ro 0 44 ro ,0 0 that would be adjacent to the Creek Trail itself rather than adjacent to Highway 85, it seems like it would be a 44 0 N a) O 0 a) 0 4) H 0 0 +) U 44 44 a) 0 v A a) H 0 those utilizing the Creek Trail to softened, again using native wildlife as well a) a, I ro • H O 0 O U •U ▪ N ro 4, 0 4) ro N 3 0 0 4.4 a) 5 0 0 a) O w ai 4-I 'O H 3 0 ro u 0 0 O N package I'd like to see careful attention paid along the benefit, so I'd like to see that as something that is really a benefit to those that use that trail. -) N m V 0) l0 r 0) 0) 0 ,-1 N m C' N (0 r CO 01 ti .i HHHH N N N N N N COMMISSIONER BOURGEOIS: he was going to just follow that up with a motion, but I'll G.' 4� 0 0 0 x 0 '0 m '0 a) 4) m 00 This is Phase One of a two-phase project. Phase Clara Valley Water District has a list of plants that are the plant palette that you're going to select is for continuity; you're going to carry that through. I noticed several of those species on the list, so I would ask that you review that list and take those off. In particular London Plane Tree is on the list, English Ivy is on the list, Vinca is on the list, I think Japanese Privet and I think the Boston ivy, but I'm not positive on those. But I think any invasive species that could potentially impact • N •'i m 0 N 4-1 b a) 4) m u 4) A 0 ,-i 0 N PO u N 0 U 0 ro u ro 0 N a) 4.1 I would also hope that when this goes before a) A 0 3 x N 3 O H 4)4 'U H 3 5 4, ro 0 a) 0 u 0 0) 4) ro a-) H 0 0 0 U filled in. Again, we want to make sure that they really are native wildflowers and that we're not planting any other a) 0 a) rn a) 0 D 4 0 a) p, H N ro • a) 0 N a) ,a N O N a) b H Co d 3 A) •0 +4)) 2 o '0 u c P • 0 H as A Z w >, aa)i 4-)00 m H 0) 4-) 0 ,3 •-4 4..) O H 4 • 0 0 a a Pi ro 0 0 4 0 O 0l 4-) 4 o U 1U4 o o 4) 4 i 0 rn .0 ai F x0 a N � 4 O -00 ▪ 0 •,-I •,-I H 4-) P.,0 0 H 0) U A .4 N m a I() 10 (0 CO 01 0 H N rmi P H t0 ti 0) 00 0 H N "1 mi .4 N N ' N N N N Having said that however I do think that things H 0 ni N x H 4 •H of 0 3 0 a) 0, 3 0 a"4) d 444 Ti 04) N 0 4) 4 .4 3 4-) 4) 4) 0 ,0O 4) .41 1-1 4) 4) 4 43 0 40) 0 0 44 4-) •.i 14 o A ro r, 0 o 0 0 3 0 HI w 0 4) O a) E 4) T) 0 0) -H 4 .4 O H a.) 44 N E 4-) o 0, 0) 1, .01 R, 4 0 '0 0 o o 4 01 0 0 as 1x rl >, N .A 4) A • 0 U 0) 0 a) H ,04 o o °, Ra, o 44 W > ro 3 3 en 4) .-I 4 H N 0 b .R •� N O-1 A 4 m a)+0) a) 3 01 `CI a H '41 o u 0 4' 0 0 4 .4 .4 '0 •.-I the Town Council asked them to do. What we don't have is the finished project, and I strongly, strongly recommend photographs, show the true size of trees, because that is looking at 4 H rd 4 ro U .H ¢, A 0 a, 14 O •.i a) w N k 4) something that shows a tree line from the back looking out U 01 W 0 H 0 4) H A ro 1-) '0 0 A 4) a) A u1 +) •.i Ao N a0) A 0) 4) A 4-1 3 Q0 N a) 4) 0 .A +) 4 q •H 3 - 44 3 problems that don't have to be. Let's just give it the way it really is, the way it really will look. The second thing is the traffic plan. It must be a) .< 1 s. 4 4 tll ro +) 131 a) HI v 4.)rC 4a•n +) H N H O 44 H a) N N N 44 O 4 3 cM U N .0 o 0, o c 0u A 0) OZ 22 H m to 4 U 0 3 H H 4) O 4 N q U [4 A 3 t7 3 9 ai 01 3 H b 4•HoCD-•N N z II, Ea .4 w .A 0 E'kED 4-) 4 �) ca N 4 3 a) O o a) 0 30 6+ .a '1.), S 4) 0k N c, b 0 w m w 4-)) al 3 •H 0) H 0 '0 0 0 0 4-1 ri N M c N ,O r a0 ON 0 rl NM N b .rW 0) 0 .y N N V If) �H H .1 H H - H H .-I HNNNNNN m 3 I agree with Commissioner O'Donnell in how do would like listed out what I 4 0 0 4) N 0A •o a0) m 0 44 H (0 .H • H HI 0 i .4 9 04 U .4 a) H +O) •H 4. N � 0 {O.) H N .4 0 0 '0 H 0) 'O 3 0 N H 0) 3 en 4 0 4) m U N 0) .0 4 consulting architect with their final thoughts on the final rl ro 4) P 4))' ro O C N 0 ro N U H ' k• 0 H 0) 41 4 0 •.1 .H HI 0 44 0 0 0U-1 0 U 4-)) H 0 401 ro 3 0 W En 3 b 4-1 0 4) N 0 0 N P, 4-) we use heavily for these details, and so those are the things that I would like. I would also like to see the final design want to have them able to see it on a Friday when Staff --) 'J, O •H H a) a) � .0 A 4) 0 •H a) a) ro 0) a) 1U.1 +) N ?I 0 N (11 4 O En 44 W H 44 0 4, 4 m, U H i A v 0Hi 09 H A 49 N 4 ) 14 0 0 3 '00 Fes' 0) 0, A 4 >, H •o 0 o0 O ,4 R, E N d' cn a) N H : N a) H � A 0 N y Hiw 4 ro q 4.a) A 140 0 4) a0-) ,4 •H 4'i ) 0 0 '3 a) 4-1 4-)0 0a) 'Jr H .4 as ro o0 ) m 4"' U • N a a1 m W .A Ww m 0' • 4-) 4 z U .4 0 N. G' U) 4 0 a) O to q 41 4) N 'O u1 O .1-1rI H U HI 0, 0 4 A 0, rn 0 .0 Oa 0 H 0 v ,4 N •H •c)4. +) a.0) N . 0. aa)) ro H 01 e, .A .H 0) •�1 .4 EA 0 b •.N1 0) H N 4) c to ,O r co O) o ., N f")' N l0 r co o, o .-I N N c If) H )y .-I rl H H H .i H HNNNNNN I would also like to include in the motion that 10 ro rn ro 3 4.) ro 0 0 4-3 ..3 004 ro 0 -) ro $4 $4 H � U 0 •,-1 U 0 a) a) 0 -I 44 � A 4-1 0 H ro will be a set of plans that address the consulting architect's issues with the possible exception of the floating wall facade and that these a) o +V) 0 '4 0 4 4-1 w 0• 0 a) ro o a) 4 4 m 0 0'0 a) N a1 1 I 4) o U m •n 0 U 'i 44 4) A oN (0 T) q 14 ro 0 b x � � 0 0 5 ° 0 ,k 0 0 0) H 41 >, '0 " T) 0 N ' 1 aa)i 0) 44 0 O, CO H •.a ro 44 ° U N N 44 o+ 0) 4-) $ '0 0 things that I think would assist the would be to install balloons or some sort of visual demarcation of the height of the buildings, and I do like the idea that was proposed of 85, some sort of computer from Highway 17 or Highway simulation from that vantage point as well since a lot of the property from that aspect. people will be seeing 0 0 o MI (I) 0 1 m m 0) R ' w o a ro (1) H Q 0 0 U a O ro .N in N 0 4) tyi 0 w a)o 4-) •.1 ro 0, 0o a O s~ o T) 0 N H ro c .-I '0 inH H 0 0 N w o N U W H U al Cry 0) C. ,fa)) Q b H 4J 01 a H o ° 4 .1 Ts'� U W p W R 44 o 2 0 01 w E. H a F 71 0Ti o 0 rn •I 0 O O O O N a) '- 0 +)o ro m U 0 H N 0 N 0) P 01 0 I) CO CO O .4 N 1+'1 .14 CO N r 0) 01 O N 0) C 0) NNN Thank you. It sounds like we've all 0 cn U issioner Bourgeois. motion? Co a) 0 0 O U m a) 10 4-) U a) 41 O H y 0 H a 4 m O a) 20 u ro 0 'o 0 M 14 °u ro "0 '0 0 «1 0 0 H 4-1 the Planning Co and Site Application subject to the proposed Conditions of I can make the following findings that no result of the project; that it is consistent with the PD Ordinance as outlined in Exhibit #2; it's consistent with demolition of Section 29.10.0903 0(e) of the Town Code for o o q 0 ate) U T) .C: c. 11- '3 Cl 4) H a) RI 1-I 0 0 0 C) • y a) u of w° •4 '1 a) 21 0 0 H ro m •U C7 a) C 0 0) W 0 q it's in substantial compliance with the Guidelines and 0' 41 o 01 t)1 U) 0 1 0 •'1 a) � S 1-) H 0 4 ; $1 cn 4) 0) RI HI z o g •'+ 0) a m 0 at To m N $4 14 0 .0 )4 41° 0 • '0 4 0 E. '0 a) a) 4" ,C1 N C/�) W that it's consistent with the considerations for approval of an Architecture and Site Application. .-, N M C 011D t` 0) 01 O N 0) N 0) CO r CO 01 O ,3 N 0) V4 ill NNNNN I Yes, certainly we will. Okay, good, then I'll ng that the outstanding also. In your motion you are ass issues between arborist and architect have been resolved? 0 0 0 it 0 4-) 0) .i ro H 4) $4 0 4 u 0 O 0 U O U X 0 COMMISSIONER BOURGEOIS: 3 '0 ›-, H x N H 0 44 44 N U 44 0 0 0 N N •�-I e ai 0 0 4-) 4-)0N 4-)•oi R 0 H 04 4 o 44 W C 0 X 4 0 34 0 0 N N 0 3 0 H H .d a -44 0 0 0) � 4-4 0) 0) H N 4 H >, N 4 4-) )a 0 H U qo 0 • • N TS •i [[••�]' N rtf J-) H 4-)ai )4 44 , f' q 44 CW7 n 0 0) N 4N) `.�' rou N ,W� J4-) 0 m a0) 11) +) aoi H o 0 o a .4 q a . a)$4 w P N ro •6 0 0 ) 441) 44 R >cn , H �0 10 H 4 - N ro 0 0 0 0 0) 0 0 0 .0e o0 4) � s 3 44 ra 0 rd a 0 4 N 0 4-) 4. 0) 4-) 0 $4 w o0 $4 44 04 4-) N 0, we're going to do that with either putting something in front of something that ever dies or behind it. I'm just b ro 0 ro N 0 0 414 4) 4 O N 4-) 4) 10 a) 0 0 4) tn 0 4 0 0 14 m 3 -) N 'O 4 iJ 0 ( O U and that visual barrier we're supposed to have won't be o44 H U4D N 4-) 1-I H .1 N CO C U1 t0 40 CO 01 0 .-1 N M G' 1.0 t0 1^ CO 01 0 r1 N 0) V' If) the approval on the completion of the 44 4 0 .44 -44 '0 0 0 U 0 traffic study by September H o .i ro N N -P A N H 3 • H N 41 3 4 en • 4 a) Ia N H 0 0 U 0 )4 R COMMISSIONER BOURGEOIS: 4 rci a) N a) m H 1) 3 4J N •.I N +) 'd 4 4R) .i o 4-1.) qq• a1 4-) to 4-) 3 N' 0O 4-1 O o O N 4 W O O-44 •.i rtf N 1-1 44 0 0 0 $-1 0 .0 44 a) '0q A A 0 4-)-P 0) '0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 4 N 4-) >, 0 0'1 0 4 O N J4 0) I'm asking for. b) H 4 O N .4' >, 3 H 4) 44 (n >, 4.) H •.I 4.) N -'-5 4 0 >, •.I 0 cn 0 N b1 4--)U L) 44 0 p 3 w 00 u m . 4-4 0) 0) 4) 4-) 0 U a-) X 0 ai 4 40 0) 4 0 >, 0 N 3 A tr N R >, a0i o '0 • N d 4) H >, al 4-) O a) U ' 04 a) N 3 D •U) u NI 0) N 0 U)N 0 Id ,C.. •.1 IA al 54N N >, W H H )4 0 -P4) U 0 N 774 '0 4 0 N H R, N 0., ❑ •'4 4-, O 0 N •• 4 0 N 0 .I 0 H 0 0 3 H .4 0 R. �44 0 0 O • b 2 >, 4 U a) HN z 3 U 4 Hn .K 0 0 .4 H -V) U)ai H3 • 0 •.Oi 44 U 4,)) OU 0. 4) N N 3 H U O .4 0 ,�N w 0 O 3 + +-) 0 •ro_ �__o _. � _p U R 0 01 0 3 .. 0 a wrapper. We need the drawings and you were telling us there's going to be a right-hand turn lane. Are you going to know enough before September 6th? Because that's the motion to do this. If you aren't, tell us now. .1 N m P 04 l0 40 CO 01 0 .4 N „) C' ,l) 10 r CO 01 0 .I N M C In 0 X 0 0 al co 0 0 0 ro co .4-)0 H ,y 0 • H 0 Pa ioni-I .A .- 00 0 >r 1 '0>) 0 00 co0 4 X 0 'O a)$ 0 0 -0 0 b 0 0 0 0 •0 0 0 0 H >r 'O E 0 'Cl 0) O n 0 O N N coa)0 b H N D 0 •.i 44 0.• p) O N (" b N 0 0 0 0 ro h 0 0 o ") m m o 0) v ro u) s4 u 0 '� W O PO 0 0 0 14 4) U 4 fi ro o H 4-) .0 '0 W O O 0 0 0 (h >v -.1 0 rl N 0 0 0) O b aSaj g q •H g 0 °LL b .� H co O R) E 0 0 .0 0 0 •. a • .4 ri 4) 0 1n 0 u b1 U 0 00q)i •. 0) }.1 2uio a .0 .) H q U O F1 .4' 00 '0 .-I. )4 u •r1 ro 0) 0 N 4) H H 4 A O � 4- W ) ›- 0, ro 0 0 0 N (0 0) o a 0v H go 2 a) 0 0 ›. 0 .A (0, m 0•a)) N a) 0 • .4 0 X ro. 0o •4 3 0 r) 14 ri .54 .-1 04 M 11 ) N O) .'0 4J 3 0 11 0 0) 0N M ' W b) N That's correct, and the matter will be readvertised and renoticed. CHAIR SAYOC: C 0 )O N Co 01 0 ti N 01 C ti t0 0 CO 010 rl N in .) 0 H H 0 al 0 )4 0) a 0 O .0 0 4-1 •.4 co co o H o H 1 H m . H FL 0) $4 0) 0 a) O X 4.) 0 O p') a) .0 ?i 0 O +) 0) �j H 0 ai co a .4 .H 0 0 4-)i H 01 v w 0) v) 0 4-) co co q 4, N w 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 H v .0 0 b' 0 ✓J clarifica is that correct? JOEL PAULSON: 0 0 0 44 •0 •H 0) o X w +4 RI.0 +) 0 ro •.i 0 2) U 4-) O q H 0 1a .0 4' ro ro H ro 1-I 0) .4' 4-) don't happen to like plaster, which is the only material, 41 a ro 3 0 °>, 4-1 H 0) 0 '0 .H 9 ro .-I O •1> 0 ro to make recommendations along those line for the Council to carefully consider those or if you have another choice or the Council_ part of this overall 0 0 0 U 'O •0 0) 0 0) 4' 0 '0 compliance yet to be between the Town architect and the Applicant? r) N (+4 m 'f1 )O I' CO 01 O .-i N In I) .O rCO 0) 0 N JOEL PAULSON: 4-) ,) a) 0 o •4 4 0 0 fl01fa, •b a-)) N U A g a) co S D m 2.0 0 0 E.N 0 '-I CO H 01 H H.H 0 0 3 Z +) w PI N 0 0 U rt 0-54 f.4 b1 0 H ) tn U) 0 •.i 4 N z•°0 •-1 •0 w HA 0 0 �l 0 4-) 4 H 0D 0 O o E H •0) W U 0 0 i75 co 0 0 .0 b1 0 rn U 0 h 4-) 0 f4 NI 1.1 HI0) 0) u) ' o0 (I) a) 0 •' 0) H 5•H H 0 A 0 4-)4 N N 0) c 0) N N N N N I'm just trying to S THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK John R. Shenk 700 Emerson Street Palo Alto, California 94301 August 31, 2011 The Honorable Joe Pirzynski, Mayor Los Gatos Town Council Members Town of Los Gatos, 110 East Main Street Los Gatos, CA 95030 Re: A&S Application S-11-051: Phase 1 Architecture and Site Approval at 90, 100, 101, 120, 121, 131, 141, 151 and 160 Albright Way and 14600 Winchester Boulevard, Los Gatos, CA Honorable Mayor Pirzynski and Town Council Members: On behalf of the property owner, LG Business Park, LLC, I am writing to respectfully request the Town Council's approval of our Phase 1 Architecture and Site ("A&S") application for the Albright Way project. Our Phase 1 A&S submittal substantially conforms to the Planned Development ("PD") Overlay Zoning, Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, and Development Agreement for the above referenced property approved by the Town Council on August 15, 2011. At the Town Council hearing on August 1, 2011, we presented conceptual plans for the first phase of a corporate campus for Netflix, Inc. We have now submitted our A&S application for your review in accordance with the guidance given by the Council at its August meeting. Specifically, we were directed as follows: • Architecture and Site applications shall be in substantial conformance with the Official Development Plan including architectural drawings and renderings submitted to Council as part of the PD and DA review and approval; • The first phase shall consist of one four-story building and one five story building; • Siting of the first phase buildings is to be as indicated in submittals, maximizing open space, setbacks and retention of existing perimeter and internal trees; • High quality architecture and materials will be used for all office buildings, equivalent to submitted drawings and the existing Netflix campus; • Later phase office buildings will be equivalent four and five story buildings to create a campus environment; • All A&S applications for the project shall be reviewed by the Planning Commission, which will formulate a recommendation to the Town Council for final action. All subsequent phases shall also follow this approval process; ATTACHMENT 5 Albright Way — Architecture and Site Application Town Council Hearing August 31, 2011 Page 12 • The Phase 1 A&S application is to be heard by the Planning Commission on August 24 and acted upon by Council on September 6, 2011. Project Summary Phase 1 of our project will be developed on ±9.9 acres of the site, and consists of the demolition and removal of five existing buildings (±109,961sf) and associated driveways, parking lots, select trees and landscaping, and the addition of two new Class A office buildings and one parking garage. Five existing buildings (±140,524 sf) will remain on the site on ± 11.5 acres. Building D will be a four-story office building with ±120,000 sf, and Building E will be a five - story office building with ±145,000 sf. We anticipate an onsite cafeteria use to be incorporated within Building E. The new parking structure will have seven parking levels (three above ground, one at grade, and three below ground) and include approximately 1,050 spaces. There also will be 88 new at grade parking spaces and 491 existing spaces that will remain. We are seeking LEED Silver certification for the new office buildings. PD Overlay Conformance The Phase 1 A&S application we have submitted for your approval is consistent and conforms to the PD Overlay approved by the Town Council on August 15, 2011. The proposal includes structures that are less than 85' in height and utilizes the existing perimeter trees, landscaping and topography to reduce the visual impact of our new development. The new office buildings and parking structure have been sited to comply with the setbacks established by the PD Overlay. The proposal reduces impervious surface area on the site and brings the total building coverage on the site to approximately 25%, well under the maximum allowed by the Town Code and the PD Overlay of 50%. The application represents the first phase of the planned implementation of the PD Overlay and furthers the goals of the Town that were cited in its approval. The approved PD Overlay Zone allows for the future development and intensification of an existing office development. The project site is located within the Vasona Light Rail area in a location identified by the approved 2020 General Plan as being well suited for more intense office and senior residential development. The application represents a balanced plan that is consistent with the Goals and Policies of the Town of Los Gatos 2020 General Plan. Phase 1 Design The design theme is to create a "Campus within the Park". This theme establishes a priority of saving as many healthy large trees as possible while emphasizing the significant amount of landscaped green space facilitated by the taller buildings. We are committed to enhancing the urban forest and maintaining the perimeter trees that provide a tree screen. The site plan has the added benefit of creating landscaped view corridors through the site that help reduce the Albright Way — Architecture and Site Application Town Council Hearing August 31, 2011 Page 13 perceived mass of the development. The land plan is strong and supports a significant inner common area. These types of functional attributes have been shown to contribute to employee satisfaction and productivity, and therefore are attractive to employers. The architectural style is similar in quality and style to the current Netflix offices with enhancements and elements appropriate for this site and use. Our architecture promotes a design synergy between our campus and the existing office building north of Highway 85. The buildings themselves show the beneficial effects of the design guidelines (stepbacks, setbacks, materials) as well as the commitment to quality we have offered. The utilization of various design concepts (recessed windows, color schemes, trellises) allows the buildings to have human scale. We have worked very closely with the Town's Consulting Architect on the design concepts and architectural style, and have revised our plans to incorporate his recommendations to date. We have chosen a landscape theme that enhances, and is consistent with, the architectural style of the buildings. The courtyards and other green spaces become outdoor "living" areas for employees to meet, relax, think, and congregate. We also have continued the use of redwood trees throughout the project to further expand the unique park setting of the property. Town Consultant Review The Phase 1 A&S application has been thoroughly reviewed by both the Town's Consulting Architect and Consulting Arborist. Since their initial review and comments submitted to the Town in mid -August, we have refined our plans to address all of their comments. These refinements are included in the plans in your packet. A verbal description of our responses is below. Consulting Architect Item #1: Trash, generator and transformer locations Response: The Building D generator has been eliminated - the associated trash enclosure has been moved to the east side of Building D away from the entry, and the transformer, which is the smallest element, will remain along Winchester for PG&E connectivity. The Building E generator/trash/transformer uses have been relocated across the loop road between Building E and the garage, and attached to the stair tower of the garage away from the building. These changes improve the site plan and satisfy the Town Architect's concerns. Albright Way — Architecture and Site Application Town Council Hearing August 31, 2011 Page 14 Item #2: Entrance Pavers Response: We have extended the pavers to the south to include the last visitor stall. This was reviewed with the Town Architect after the Planning Commission hearing and is acceptable. Item #3 Entryway areas between buildings Response: The addition of the "ancient olives" in the main area is a powerful start to the development of the entryway between buildings. The Town Architect approves our providing a more detailed paving pattern design in this area as the construction drawings progress, as this level of detail is not required at this time. Item #4 Floor Plate Size Response: We reviewed the added ground floor covered arcades with the Town Architect. He agrees that this has answered the concern for more articulation. This also resolved Item #9. Item #5 Top of Stair Towers Response: The stair towers have been redesigned in alignment with the Town Architect's input. The Town Architect agrees that additional study is not necessary for the A&S approval. In consultation with the Town Architect we will study an additional detail (raising the sill height for smaller windows) in this area during our construction document phase. Item #6 Stair Tower Split for Building E Response: We revised the stair tower by dividing the base of the tower on Building E into equal height and detail per the suggestion of the Town Architect. He has approved the revision. Item #7 Building E Secondary Entry Response: We are working on a design solution with the Town Architect that resolves the termination of the sloped roof above the entry as well as the entry feature itself. The Town Architect agrees that resolution of this item is not necessary for A&S Albright Way — Architecture and Site Application Town Council Hearing August 31, 2011 Page 15 approval, and is comfortable resolving it during the construction document phase. Item #8 Termination of tile roof element at second level roof line of Building E Response: See response to Item #7 above. Item #9 Southwest corner of Building E Response: See response to Item #4 above Item #10 Color of the top floor trellises Response: This has been changed to a dark color to minimize its visual perception and is acceptable to the Town Architect. Item #11 Floating wall plane Response: The Town Architect has agreed that the wall plane design is acceptable if we change the color of the returns (where they occur) to the ochre color rather than cream. We have made the change. The Planning Commission expressed some concern regarding not having final architectural drawings for review, based on the fact that not all of the Town Architect's comments had been incorporated into the plans in their packet. At this point, all of the Town Architect's comments related to the A&S approval have been incorporated into the plans in your packet. The plans are at a level of detail typical for this stage of the process. As we move into construction drawings, we will continue to refine the design details in consultation with the Town Architect, as is typical for that stage of the process. Consulting Arborist Item #1: Removal of trees Response: The Town Arborist's report of August 18, 2011 indicates 116 total trees for removal. We have adjusted our designs to pedestrian, parking island and curb alignments to reduce the total number of trees to be removed by 11% in Phase 1 to +/-103. Albright Way — Architecture and Site Application Town Council Hearing August 31, 2011 Page 16 Item #2: Trees to be highly impacted Response: The Town Consulting Arborist's report of August 18, 2011 indicates 58 trees that may be highly impacted by the Phase 1 development in addition to the 103 identified for removal. We have adjusted our designs to pedestrian, parking island and curb alignments to minimize any impact. Specifically: • The 14 trees along the western perimeter will not be impacted as our curb alignment will remain consistent with the existing curb alignment per the Town Consulting Arborist's recommendation. • The potential impact to the 2 trees by the new drop-off curb was eliminated by maintaining an eight -foot setback from the trunks as recommended by the Town Consulting Arborist. • The potential impact to the 5 trees at the Northwest corner of the garage has been minimized by the adjusting the alignment of the utility trench. Four of the five trees will be preserved for garage screening per the Town Consulting Arborist's recommendations. • The 2 trees in the courtyard/dining terrace now have a minimum fifteen - foot setback from their trunks (per Arborist recommendation) due to adjustments in the paving and site retaining wall configurations. • We also have accepted and will implement all the recommended tree protection measures detailed in the Town Arborist's report to protect all trees. Finally, the 135 trees that are identified but untagged will be tagged prior tothe issuance of the building permit as requested by the Town Consulting Arborist. This item has been noted on the Tree Disposition Plan for implementation. Planning Commission In response to the feedback we received from the Planning Commission on August 24, we have further refined the plans. The Commission's recommended approval contained seven recommendations: 1. Complete plans should address the consulting architect and arborist recommendations and include details on the new intersection; 2. Balloons should be installed and additional photo simulations should be provided; 3. Modify the proposed plantings to ensure no species on SCVWD list of prohibited plants will be planted along waterways 4. Ensure the proposed native wildflower area only contains native wildflowers; Albright Way — Architecture and Site Application Town Council. Hearing August 31, 2011 Page 17 5. Consider incorporating a wildflower area to the east edge of the property; 6. Use native drought tolerant species; and 7. Carefully consider the size and placement of replacement perimeter trees The comments from the consulting architect and arborist are addressed above. To present our responses to the remaining comments and questions from the Planning Commission, we have consolidated the items into categories. Traffic: Item #1: Traffic Signal Configuration, Winchester Improvements, Impacts to Winchester Response: The Planning Commission wanted to better understand the new traffic signal configuration and improvements along Winchester Boulevard. The site will continue to be served by the two existing project entrances along Winchester Boulevard at Albright Way and at the southern boundary of the site. In addition, a new signalized project entrance will be provided along Winchester Boulevard approximately 200 feet south of the current Albright Way, aligned with the Courtside Club entrance (site plan and graphic provided in A&S submittal). The specific improvements are below: Southern Driveway The southern entrance along Winchester Boulevard will continue to be restricted to right -turn in and right -turn out only. Albright Way Entrance The existing Albright Way driveway will be restricted to right -turn in and right - turn out only. Improvements approved by the Town's Public Works department will be constructed at this entrance to restrict left -turn movements into and from the site. New Signal with Courtside Entrance A new signal will be provided along Winchester Boulevard, opposite the existing Courtside Club entrance. The new leg at the project entrance will include one left -turn lane and one shared through -left -right -turn lane. A southbound lef t- turn lane (southbound Winchester Boulevard to project entrance) and an exclusive right -turn lane from northbound Winchester Boulevard to the project entrance also will be constructed. The following improvements will be implemented as directed by the Town Public Works department on Winchester Boulevard corridor to accommodate site access: Albright Way — Architecture and Site Application Town Council Hearing August 31, 2011 Page I8 • A median at the existing Albright Way intersection to restrict left -turn movements into and from the project site. • The existing southbound left -turn lane along Winchester Boulevard at the Albright Way intersection will be lengthened exclusively to serve the new intersection. • Addition of an exclusive right -turn lane from northbound Winchester Boulevard to the new entrance. • Addition of a southbound left -turn lane from southbound Winchester Boulevard to thenew entrance. _. • Installation of required wiring and systems to enable the Town to adjust and synchronize the intersections at Winchester and project entrance, Winchester and Wimbledon, Winchester and Lark, and Lark and University Avenue. These improvements will ensure that Phase 1 of the proposed project does not result in impacts to operations along Winchester Boulevard. The new signal and other associated improvements will be built during the construction of the new buildings and garage. Item #2: On -site Circulation Response: The majority of the existing on -site circulation system will remain with the construction of Phase 1. However, the easement for a public right of way on Albright Way will be vacated and replaced with private access. The new private roadway will follow a similar alignment as the current portion of Albright Way that runs parallel to Winchester Boulevard, however the new road will be relocated approximately 125 feet west and continue to run parallel to Winchester Boulevard. The relocated road will provide access to the parking garage for Phase 1 as well as the remainder of the site. All parking areas will be accessible from each of the two primary driveways. The construction of the new signalized project entrance aligned with the existing Courtside Club entrance along Winchester Boulevard will require adjustment of the parking and drive aisles in front of 14600 Winchester Boulevard and 90 Albright Way, which are to remain. A new on site road will be constructed to provide access to the new signalized entrance. The new access roadway will connect to Albright Way via a traffic circle. The new traffic circle will provide efficient access for both inbound and outbound traffic from the Phase 1 area in addition to the existing buildings that will remain. Albright Way — Architecture and Site Application Town Council Hearing August 31, 2011 Page 19 Overall, the adjustments to the on -site roadway system during Phase 1 of the project provide adequate on -site circulation and queuing for vehicles as demonstrated in the Albright Phase 1 Traffic Circulation Analysis of August 25, 2011 submitted to the Town. Site Planning: Item #1: Updated Renderings and Size of Landscape Trees Response: Since the Planning Commission hearing, we have updated all of the renderings submitted for your review to reflect all of our conversations with the Town's Consulting Architect and Town Arborist and Town Public Works and Planning Department staff. All of their suggestions are reflected on the plans that were submitted for the Council packets. The renderings demonstrate how the buildings will look in their natural environment. The landscaping and trees represented on the renderings are intended to show the character of the site. Item #2: Additional Photo Simulations and Height Balloons Response: The issue of height demonstration (balloons and additional photo simulations) was raised. The height was resolved as part of the Council's approval of the PD zoning on August 15. The photo simulations presented in your Council packet, both at the Council hearing on August 1 and 15 and for your review as part of our A&S application, provide a realistic demonstration of how the buildings will appear in terms of both height and massing. We are in the process of preparing additional photo simulations to supplement the information previously provided. These will be presented at the Council hearing on September 6, 2011. Item #3: Explanation of Garage Architecture Response: As agreed with the Town Architect, the garage is designed to recede aesthetically so as not to compete with the buildings or perimeter trees. The color will be dark. The walls will be a grid rather than post and beam to harmonize with the grids of the buildings. Additional trees will be planted along the freeway side of the structures for screening. All are reflected in the current plan set. Albright Way - Architecture and Site Application Town Council Hearing August 31, 2011 Page 110 Item #4: Response: Landscaping - Tree Locations, Plant Species, SCVWD Plant List In our A&S submittal package, the landscape planting plan identifies planting zones for shrubs and groundcovers, and calls out trees specifically. The zones are as follows: • Zonel: Courtyard/Arcade areas that includes ornamentals species • Zone2: Building Perimeter areas that includes ornamental and native species • Zone3: Parking areas that include native and low water use species • Zone4:. Meadow area that includes a native wildflower mix The Planning Commission expressed a concern about the use of invasive species along the riparian corridor area, and asked that we review the Santa Clara Valley Water District's (SCVWD) Approved Plant List for consistency. Phase 1 does not include any planting near the creek. Nevertheless we have removed all invasive species from our list of identified plants to be used in the riparian corridor, and noted that any species considered invasive per the SCVWD list will not be used in proximity to the riparian corridor. We are in conformance with the SCVWD Approved Plant List. The Commission also wanted to ensure that only native wildflowers are planted in the meadow, and suggested planting .wildflowers along the creek trail:: Our planting list contains only a native wildflower mix for the meadow area. Phase 1 does not propose any planting along the creek trail, as those parcels are not a part of this application. When a future phase of development is proposed, we will comply with the Town of Los Gatos' Guidelines and Standards for Land Uses near streams. Additionally, we would recommend that any tree replacement quantities that are not met within the Phase 1 area be located on -site along the creek trail instead of paying the in -lieu fee. This would allow for a more consistent native, low water -use tree canopy cover along the existing creek trail boundary with the property. Finally, the Planning Commission raised concerns about the potential loss of perimeter Redwood trees. We will work with the Town Arborist on a tree by tree basis to ensure that we are in compliance with the Town's canopy replacement ratio should a tree be lost. However, we are confident that Albright Way - Architecture and Site Application Town Council Hearing August 31, 2011 Page 111 Community Item #1: Response: Conclusion implementation of the Tree Protection Measures as recommended by the Town's Consulting Arborist as specified in the MMRP and compliance with all of the protection specification and Town permitting requirements during construction will minimize, if not eliminate, any tree loss during construction. Construction Notifications There was a question from the Commission related to construction notifications. This issue is addressed in the PD Overlay approval. It requires us to have a pre - construction meeting with the Town to discuss the project conditions of approval related to construction, working hours, site maintenance and other construction related matters. The Phase 1 A&S application is in conformance and compliance with the PD Overlay Zoning for the site. We will continue to work closely with Town Staff and their consultants as we move into the construction drawings to address any minor changes needed to ensure that the highest quality project is built for Netflix and the Town of Los Gatos. I respectfully request the Town Council's approval of the Phase 1 Architecture and Site application. If you have any questions or would like additional information, please contact me directly at (408) 242-9052 or by email at jshenk@me.com. Respectfully, John R. Shenk Development Manager Owner's Representative & Applicant THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK