2011062012 - Town Council Meetin Minutes of June 6, 2011DRAFT Council/Agency Meeting 06/20/11
Item # ,a
MINUTES OF THE TOWN COUNCIL/PARKING AUTHORITY/REDEVELOPMENT
AGENCY MEETING
JUNE 6, 2011
The Town Council of the Town of Los Gatos conducted a Regular Meeting on Monday,
June 6, 2011 at 7:00.P.M.
TOWN COUNCIL/PARKING AUTHORITY/REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
MEETING CALLED TO ORDER AT 7:00 P.M.
ROLL CALL
Present: Mayor Joe Pirzynski, Vice Mayor Steve Rice, Council Member Steven
Leonard's, Council Member Diane McNutt, and Council Member Barbara Spector.
Absent: None.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Rachel An, Blossom Hill Elementary school led the Pledge of Allegiance. The audience
was invited to participate:
PRESENTATIONS
2011 Youth Friendly Business of the Year - Los Gatos Roasting Company
Mayor Joe Pirzynski, Chief Scott Seaman, and Nicky Robinson, Youth Commission
Chair, presented the Youth Friendly Business of the Year award to the Los Gatos
Coffee Roasting Company.
Teri Hope, Los Gatos Coffee Roasting Company, accepted the award and thanked
the Youth Commission and the community for their support.
Outgoing Student Commissioners - Jacob Hershberger and Nicky Robinson
- Mayor Joe Pirzynski and Chief Scott Seaman presented commendations to the
outgoing Youth Commissioners.
CLOSED SESSION REPORT
- There was no Closed Session scheduled for this meeting.
TOWN COUNCIL
COUNCIL/TOWN MANAGER REPORTS
Council Matters
- There were no Council Matters for this meeting.
Manager Matters
Mr, Larson
Commented that the Music in the Park series will begin on June 19, 2011 and Jazz
in the Plazz will begin on June 22, 2011.
Commented that the Town is currently seeking applications for the Planning
Commission and for the General Plan Committee. The deadline to submit
applications is Friday, July 22, 2011.
Did You Know??
Mr. Larson
- Introduced the newly appointed Santa Clara County Fire Chief Kenneth Kehmna.
- Chief Kehmna thanked Council and the community for their support.
CONSENT ITEMS (TO BE ACTED UPON BY A SINGLE MOTION)
1. Adopt resolution establishing the FY 2011 /2012 GANN appropriations limit for the
Town of Los Gatos. RESOLUTION 2011-037
2. Approve minutes from May 25, 2011 Special Joint Town Council/Planning
Commission Study Session.
3. Appoint members and alternates to the Los Gatos Youth Commission, Community
Services Commission, and Parks Commission as recommended by the Ad Hoc Council
Sub -Committee.
4. PPW Job No. 10-08 - FY 2010/11 Curb, Gutter, and Sidewalk Replacement Project
411-813-9921
a. Authorize the Town Manager to execute a construction contract with Nor -Cal
Concrete Company in an amount not to exceed $223,072
b. Authorize staff to execute future change orders to the construction contract as
necessary in an amount not to exceed $25,000
Consent Items #1-7 - Continued
TOWN COUNCIL/REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
5. Approve Council/Agency minutes of May 16, 2011
6. Approve Town Council/Redevelopment Agency Meeting Schedule for 2011-2012
Fiscal Year.
7. Adopt resolutions approving the Town and Redevelopment Agency's Fiscal Year
2011/12 Operating Budget, Capital Improvement Program for Fiscal Years 2011/12-
2015/16, Carry -Forward Appropriations, and other approved adjustments and minor
corrections. RESOLUTION 2011-038 and RESOLUTION 2011-039
MOTION:
Motion by Council Member Barbara Spector to approve Consent
Items #1-7.
Seconded by Council Member Diane McNutt.
VOTE: Motion passed unanimously.
Mayor Joe Pirzynski introduced the new Youth Commissioners and Parks
Commissioner.
VERBAL COMMUNICATIONS
Mr. Knowles
- Commented on supporting Los Gatos Music and Arts and the Los Gatos Police
Foundation and thanked Teri Hope for all her dedication and support with these
foundations.
Ms. Buschini
- Commented about her accident where she tripped over a tree grate on Los Gatos
Boulevard and suggested that the Town fill in the hole around the tree grate to
prevent the possibility of a future accident.
Ms. Outler
Expressed concerns about the proposed pedestrian bridge at the Creekside Sports
Park.
Suggested including all of the park neighbors in future community meetings
involving the Creekside Sports Park.
Verbal Communications — Continued
Mr. Larson
- Commented that the Town is just now launching discussions and community
meetings regarding the sports park.
Closed Verbal Communications
TOWN COUNCIL
PUBLIC HEARINGS
8. Consider a request to expand an existing restaurant (Main Street Burgers) into a
space currently occupied by a separate restaurant (Cold Stone Creamery) on property
zoned C-2. APN 510-45-075. Conditional Use Permit U-11-001. Property Location: 20
S. Santa Cruz Avenue, Suites #200 & 201. Property Owner: Portfolio Management Co.
Applicant: Ed Rathmann. RESOLUTION 2011-040
Staff report made by Jennifer Savage, Associate Planner.
Open Public Hearing
Mr. Rathmann and Mr. Thompson, Applicants
Commented that the Planning Commission supports the proposed expansion.
Mr. Knowles
- Commented on supporting the proposed project.
Closed Public Hearing
MOTION:
Motion by Council Member Barbara Spector to approve the
expansion of an existing restaurant (Main Street Burgers) into a
space currently occupied by a separate restaurant (Cold Stone
Creamery) on property zoned C-2. APN 510-45-075. Conditional
Use Permit U-11-001. Property Location: 20 S. Santa Cruz
Avenue, Suites #200 & 201. Property Owner: Portfolio
Management Co. Applicant: Ed Rathmann.
Seconded by Council Member Diane McNutt.
VOTE: Motion passed unanimously.
Page 4
Public Hearings — Continued
9. Reconsider a request to expand an existing restaurant (Gardino's) to add seating, full
alcoholic beverage service, and modify hours of operation on property zoned C-2. APN
510-44-030. Conditional Use Permit Application U-10-023. Property location: 49-51 N.
Santa Cruz Avenue. Property owner: Jennifer White. Applicant: Pete Jillo
RESOLUTION 2011-041
Council Member Barbara Spector recused from Item #9 due to the fact that her law firm
has represented a participant in the hearing.
Staff report made by Jennifer Savage, Associate Planner.
Open Public Hearing
Mr. Carter, Applicant
Commented that Mr. Jillo has requested a Conditional Use Permit that would only
provide additional seating. No kitchen would be added, and the space could be
reverted back to retail in the future.
Commented that Guardino's may not be able to retain their viability without the
expansion.
Requested that Council approve the proposed application.
Commented that Guardino's has been a local business for over 17 years as well as
an affordable "mom and pop" business in the downtown area.
Commented that Guardino's has reduced the size of their counter space and does
not feel that an operational agreement would be needed.
Council Comments
- Questioned if the applicant agrees to the proposed 30% reduction to the length of
the counter space.
Questioned if the Town is legally protected without an operational agreement.
- Questioned if Mr. Jillo is set on placing the benches at a certain location.
Questioned if the applicant would be able to move forward with the application and
improvements as staff is finalizing the Conditional Use Permit and operational
agreement.
Mr. Carter
Clarified that their only concern would be if the counter space was further reduced,
causing the refrigeration unit to become visible.
Clarified that the applicants reduced the counter space by 30% and reduced the
seating to seven seats at the counter.
Page 5
Public Hearing Item #9 — Continued
Mr. Jillo
- Commented that he is flexible with staff's recommendation for the location of the
benches and the recommended 30% reduction to the counter length.
Ms. Propp
Commented that there is strong language in the Conditional Use Permit and the
resolution, however, the operational agreement does allow for additional protection
and would address site specific issues that may come up.
Commented that the timing to finalize an operational agreement could be within 30
days.
Mr. Larson
- Commented that the Conditional Use Permit does supply minimum protection by
involving the property owner and that any change of ownership would require a new
Conditional Use Permit.
- Clarified that the applicant would t?e permitted to move forward with the expansion
and the expanded certificate of occupancy would be issued once all documents
have been finalized.
Mr. Knowles
Commented that the applicant has agreed to reduce the counter seating from seven
to five, but would request that the reduction to the counter length remain at the
recommended 30% reduction to accommodate the refrigeration needs.
Requested that Council approve the proposed project.
Mr. Greenfield
- Commented on supporting the proposed project.
Mr. Herrera
- Commented on supporting the proposed project.
Mr. Hossenlopp
- Commented on supporting the proposed project.
Mr. Normandin
Commented on supporting the proposed project.
Mr. Abela
- Commented on supporting the proposed project.
Rev. Bernal
- Commented on supporting the proposed project.
Page 6
Public Hearing Item #9 — Continued
Mr. Price
- Commented on supporting the proposed project.
Mr. Campbell
- Commented on supporting the proposed project.
Mr. Buxton
- Commented on supporting the proposed project.
Mr. Bellezza
- Commented on supporting the proposed project.
Ms. Gutierrez
- Commented on supporting the proposed project.
Ms. Smith
- Commented on supporting the proposed project.
Mr. Munz
- Commented on supporting the proposed project.
Ms. Pugliese
- Commented on supporting the proposed project.
Ms. Hutchinson
- Commented on supporting the proposed project.
Mr. Lonsdale
- Commented on supporting the proposed project.
Mr. Boitano
- Commented on supporting the proposed project.
Mr. Jillo, Applicant
Thanked the community for their support.
Closed Public Hearing
7
Public Hearing Item #9 — Continued
Council Comments
Questioned if staff would consider the recommended seven seats for the proposed
project.
Requested discussing the counter space and the number of seats separately.
Questioned the significance of an operational agreement.
Mr. Larson
Commented that regardless if there were seven seats or five seats, the total
occupancy is 45 seats for the establishment.
Clarified that the operating agreement would provide an agreement with the owner.
Commented that the operational agreement could be completed within 30 days.
Mr. Larson
Commented on the revised Conditions of Approval under Exhibit A of Attachment 2:
Items #1 and #6, wherever dates are submitted for reference by the development
plans which were submitted on February 25, 2011, those would be changed to the
most revised plan date of May 25, 2011.
Item #7 — Number of seats is up to the Council discretion of either staffs
recommendation of five or the applicant's request of seven or the original request of
ten.
Item #8 - Changed for the record to read: The food service counter shall be no
larger than shown on the development plans, noted as received by the Town on
May 25, 2011. All other language would be struck from that Condition.
Page 2:
Item #20 - Reads as follows: (issuance of building permits or) Prior to the initiation
of any operational changes permitted under this approval.
Item #21 - Regarding the property owner: The property owner shall sign, agree, and
submit to the operational agreement prior to commencement of use. The property
owner shall submit in writing the agreement and commitment to the Conditional Use
Permit prior to commencement of use.
Community Benefit: Community benefit would be simplified to read: The applicant
has offered the following community benefit to offset traffic impacts created by the
proposed project. Two public benches to be placed in the downtown area to the
satisfaction of the Director of Parks and Public Works.
P age 8
Public Hearing Item #9 -. Continued
MOTION:
Motion by Vice Mayor Steve Rice to expand an existing
restaurant (Gardino's) to add seating, full alcoholic beverage
service, and modify hours of operation on property zoned C-
2. APN 510-44-030. Conditional Use Permit Application U-
10-023. Property location: 49-51 N. Santa Cruz Avenue.
Adopt resolution in Attachment 2 with the modified
Conditions of Approval as stated above by Mr. Larson and
with the recommended 30 % reduction to the counter space
and up to seven seats at that counter.
Seconded by Council Member Diane McNutt.
VOTE: Motion passed unanimously.
Mayor Joe Pirzynski called for a recess at 8:22 p.m. Meeting resumed at 8:30 p.m.
10. Planned Development PD-07-145; and Negative Declaration ND-0-148. Property
Location: 16005 Los Gatos Boulevard. Property Owner: CHL Ventures, LP. Applicant:
Kenneth Rodrigues & Partners
a. Consider approval of a planned development to change the zone from CH to
Ch:PD, for a mixed use development consisting of retail and office commercial
space, townhomes, and single family residences. APNS 529-16-025 and 053
b. Consider adoption of the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation
Monitoring Plan
Staff report made by Heather Bradley, Contract Planner.
Council Comments
Requested clarification regarding the next steps.
Requested clarification about the "net benefit" costs.
Questioned the contribution cost for the Los Gatos Boulevard and Blossom Hill
Road intersection improvements.
Questioned if the footprint and height are what is being considered as part of the
Planned Development.
Questioned how vehicles exit the proposed parking lot to go northbound on Los
Gatos Boulevard.
Questioned if a vehicle could cross over to the far left turn lane on Los Gatos
Boulevard to make a left turn onto eastbound Blossom Hill Road.
e 9
Public Hearing Item #10 — Continued
Council. Comments — Continued
Questioned if staff has had discussions with the superintendent of the schools
regarding the increased number of students.
Questioned the determination of the traffic impacts and if the North 40 plan was
included in that study.
Ms. Bradley
- Clarified that the applicant would be paying approximately $65,000 to install full
improvements at the Los Gatos Boulevard and Blossom Hill Road intersection.
Mr. Larson
Clarified that the community benefit has been calculated by the Director of Parks
and Public Works and Community Development at $24,000 which is the $60,000
minus the $36,000 fair share.
Ms. Bradley
Clarified that specific plans would be reviewed during the Architecture and Site
process and that the residents would be notified when that process will take place.
Clarified that the footprint and height would be considered as part of the Planned
Development process.
Clarified that there is a right out only onto Los Gatos Boulevard and vehicles would
have to move into the far left turn lane to make a U-turn at Magnesson Loop or
make a right turn onto Placer Oaks from the propose Placer Oaks exit, then left at
Oak Rim Way, then Left at Blossom Hill Road.
Clarified that the school district was in agreement with the formula and that the
formula is the same formula used to calculate students per household in the
General Plan.
Mr. Capurso
• - Clarified that there is no restriction to cross over to the far left lane to turn eastbound
onto Blossom Hill Road.
- Clarified that a striping scheme to create an island effect would prohibit any type of
crossover move.
Ms. Baily
- Clarified that the traffic study did not include the North 40 plan.
Open Public Hearing
Ken Rodrigues, Applicant
- Commented about the differences between the original proposed project and the
current proposed project.
g e 10
Public Hearing Item #10 — Continued
Mr. Dare, Applicant
- Commented that the old story poles have been removed and the height has been
reduced and new story poles were erected.
Commented about the high quality retail proposed for the project.
Council Comments
Requested clarification if there is a benefit from not being able to turn into the
property at the first access point from Los Gatos Boulevard.
Questioned if some sort of diverter could be used to discourage traffic from entering
Placer Oaks.
Questioned if there would be exiting permitted at the south access point and if there
would be enough space to make a left turn onto Blossom Hill Road.
Expressed concerns about traffic issues currently along Los Gatos Boulevard.
Questioned how much of the traffic improvements would be addressed during the
Architecture and Site process.
Mr. Rodrigues
- Clarified that the Planning Commission was concerned that a diverter would not
allow any traffic to enter Placer Oaks neighborhood.
- Clarified that the Planning Commission suggested that the residential access be
limited to reduce traffic entering and exiting onto Placer Oaks.
- Commented about the idea of a U-turn on Blossom Hill Road.
- Commented that the left turn lane on Blossom Hill Road would solve a lot of the
traffic issues.
- Commented that the applicants would like to work with staff to solve the traffic
issues both on Los Gatos Boulevard and Blossom Hill Road.
Mr. Larson
- Clarified that there is not a firm engineering estimate,_ but the improvements to the
Los Gatos Boulevard/Blossom Hill Road intersection would be a significant
improvement. Total improvements for the other intersection improvement projects
would be much more than $150,000.
- Clarified that the $150,000 is projected for the two intersection improvements before
Council as part of the Planned Development.
Ms. Brown
Expressed concerns about the view sheds looking to the east hills.
Suggested "hip roofing" to reduce the height of the structures.
Suggested changing the orientation of the homes along Blossom Hill Road for a
better view shed.
Suggested a lower scaled breezeway at the front of the proposed project.
11
Public Hearing Item #10 — Continued
Ms. Yazdi
- Expressed concerns about the height of the structures.
- Expressed concerns about the noise and traffic associated with the proposed
project.
Mr. Shepardson
- Expressed concerns about the lack of story poles at the location.
- Expressed concerns about children close to the intersection at Blossom Hill Road
and Los Gatos Boulevard.
Council Comments
- Questioned if Mr. Shepardson was concerned about the proposed project being
adjacent to his property.
Mr. Shepardson
- Clarified that he feels that the community should have full disclosure and feels that
the story poles would have provided disclosure relating to the mass, scale, and
height of the proposed project.
Ms. Averkiou
- Expressed concerns about the traffic issues associated with the proposed project.
- Expressed concerns about not being able to make a left turn onto Los Gatos
Boulevard and would like to see a design that would allow the left turn onto Los
Gatos Boulevard.
Ms. McDaniel
Expressed concerns that the Placer Oaks neighborhood would be adversely
impacted by the proposed project.
Commented about the petition opposing the project which was submitted by the
neighbors.
Mr. Greene
Expressed concerns about the traffic and safety impacts to the Placer Oaks
neighborhood.
Would like to see the project be sent back to the Planning Commission to address
traffic and safety.
Ms. Hunter
- Expressed concerns about the traffic issues along Los Gatos Boulevard.
- Would like to see traffic issues addressed before Council approves the proposed
project.
P 12
Public Hearing Item #10 — Continued
Ms. Adams
- Expressed concerns that the residential development may impact the local schools.
- Expressed concerns about the increased traffic during the school hours.
Mr. Nedom
- Suggested that the Town consider future impacts from other projects along Los
Gatos Boulevard.
- Would like to see more retail/office space and less residential development.
Expressed concerns that the residential development may further impact the local
schools.
Ms. Bryant
- Commented on supporting the proposed project.
- Commented that the traffic was greater when the Swanson Ford business was in
operation.
Mr. Gallmeister
- Expressed concerns about the impacts to the local schools.
Mr. Rodrigues, Applicant
Commented that they have properly notified the community and have received
community support for the proposed project.
Commented that they are working with staff to address traffic impacts and safety
issues at the intersections.
Mr. Dare, Applicant
Commented that they are planning dedication areas and medians along Los Gatos
Boulevard and Blossom Hill Road to mitigate the traffic.
Commented that they have included an additional Below Market Priced unit to the
proposed plans.
Closed Public Hearing
Council Comments
Questioned if there was consideration to add a light and crosswalk at Oak Rim Way.
Commented that a red curb along Blossom Hill Road at Oak Rim Way may provide
a clearer sight line for vehicles entering Blossom Hill Road from Oak Rim Way.
Requested clarification relating to the proposed view shed corridors.
Questioned past traffic use associated with the Swanson Ford business.
Questioned if the applicant would address the concerns about lack of sunlight and
the width of the corridors between the homes.
Questioned privacy issues and placement of windows.
Questioned the setbacks and if the proposed units would block view sheds and
sunlight.
13
Public Hearing Item #10 — Continued
Council Comments — Continued
Questioned if the formula for calculating how many students per household was
accurate and approved by the school district.
Would like to have seen the story poles up a week earlier so the community could
evaluate the mass and scale of the project.
Suggested that the applicant be very attentive to the traffic issues associated with
the proposed project as well as the surrounding neighborhoods.
Questioned the time frame to complete the project.
Commented that the Architecture and Site process should address neighborhood
issues.
Mr. Capurso
Clarified that a light and crosswalk at Oak Rim Way has not been considered or
evaluated at this point.
Clarified that staff could look at the possibility of a merge lane for entering Blossom
Hill. Road, however, that would require a right-of-way study to determine if there
would be enough room along that portion of the road.
Mr. Rodrigues and Mr. Dare
Clarified that the units have been turned slightly to add view shed corridors for the
Placer Oaks community.
Clarified that there would be limited shadows cast from the proposed homes since
the units are only 26 feet high.
Clarified that they can address privacy issues with landscape and window
placement.
Clarified that the school district had agreed on the formula placed in the General
Plan and feels that it should be accurate.
Commented that the proposed project does not block views of the east foothills.
Clarified that they will be working immediately with the neighborhood and hopes to
complete the project in about 2 years.
MOTION:
Motion by Council Member Diane McNutt to accept the
Planning Commission' s findings and recommendations in
the form of meeting minutes (Attachment 3), uphold the
Planning Commission' s recommendation to adopt the
Mitigated Negative Declaration (Attachment 3), adopt
findings supporting the zone change (Attachment 9),
approve the application subject to the performance
standards included in the Planned Development Ordinance,
and to introduce the ordinance of the Town of Los Gatos
effecting the zone change from CH to CH:PD (Attachment
10.)
Seconded by Vice Mayor Steve Rice.
PasE e 14
Public Hearing Item #10 — Continued
VOTE: Motion passed unanimously.
Mayor Joe Pirzynski directed Jackie Rose, Clerk Administrator to read the title of the
ordinance.
MOTION:
Motion by Council Member Diane McNutt to waive the
reading of the ordinance.
Seconded by Vice Mayor Steve Rice.
VOTE: Motion passed unanimously.
OTHER BUSINESS
- There was no Other Business scheduled for this meeting.
ADJOURNMENT
Attest:
Jackie D. Rose, Clerk Administrator
Page 15
THIS PAGE
INTENTIONALLY
LEFT BLANK