Loading...
2000-075-Granting And Remanding An Appeal Of A Planning Commission Decision Approving Applications For A Conditional Use Permit For A Master Plan Of Hillbroook School And Approval Of An Architecture And Site Application To Demolish An Existing~- RESOLUTION 2000 - 75 .RESOLUTION GRANTING AND REMANDING AN APPEAL OF A PLANNING COMMISSION DECISION APPROVING APPLICATIONS FOR A CONDITIONAL USE .PERMIT FOR A MASTER PLAN OF HILLBROOK SCHOOL AND APPROVAL OF AN ARCHITECTURE AND SITE APPLICATION TO DEMOLISH AN EXISTING CLASSROOM BUILDING AND TO CONSTRUCT NEW CLASSROOM BUILDING .ADJACENT TO THE OLD .BUILDING ON PROPERTY ZONED HR-1 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION; PRJ-99-062 ARCHITECTURE AND SITE APPLICATION: PRJ-99-063 PROPERTY LOCATION: 300 MARCHIVIONT DRIVE PROPERTY OWNER./ APPLICANT.: HILLBROOK SCHOOL .APPELLANT: ELAINE AND ARTHUR MYERS WHEREAS: A. This matter .came before the Council for public hearing on Junes, 2000, on an appeal by Elaine and Arthur Myers (appellant) from a decision of the .Planning Commission and was regularly noticed in conformance with .State and Town law. B. The Council :received testimony and documentary evidence from the appellant and all :interested persons who wished to testify or submit documents. The Council considered all testimony and materials submitted, including the record of the Planning Commission proceedings and the packet of material contained in the Council Agenda Report datedMay 24,.2000, June 1, 2000, and June 5, 2000, along with subsequent reporCs and materials prepared concerning this application. C. The Development Review Committee .considered the applications on May 25,1999, and deemed the applications. complete subject to conditions. The Planning Commission considered the matter on April 12, 2000, and approved the applications subject to modified Conditions of Approval, one of which being that the emergency access gate on Ann ArborDrive remain open during construction. D. The appellants are appealing the Planning Commission decision because they believethat the Commission erred or abused its discretion and that the decision was not based on evidence in the record. E. Council firias pursuant to Town Code section 29.2U.~~0 that new information was submitted to the Council during the requested hearing that was not readily available at the time of the Planning Commission review. Information was presented describing a willingness to further address policies and guidelines concerning the traffic, school and evening activities and a limit on student enrollment. Such information .should be reviewed by the Planning Commission for consistency with Town. regulations, polices and guidelines. RESOLVED: The appeal of the decision of the Planning Commission on Proj ect Applications PRJ-99-062 and PRJ-99-063 is therefore granted and the application are .remanded to the Planning Commission for reevaluation of the plans .and design with reference to the number of parking spaces permitted under the CUP, duration of after school and evening activities in the calendar year, and a limit on student enrollment. Further, the Planning Commission should evaluate a traffic study and traffic calming measures. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Town Council of the Town of Los Gatos, California held on the 19TH day of June, 2000 by the following vote. COUNCIL MEMBERS:: AYES: Jan Hutchins, Joe Przynski, Mayor Steven Blanton. NAYS: None ABSENT: Randy Attaway, Linda Lubeck ABSTAIN: None SIGNED: lVlt~ 1 ~/i\ Vl' l l1L' 1 lJ VV 1V" Vl' LOS GATOS, CALIFORNIA ATTEST CLERK OF THE TOWN OF .LOS GATOS LOS GATOS, CALIFORNIA :TOS S:~?,TV6t9.25 2