Loading...
Item 21 Staff Report Consider Traffic Engineer's Report on Los Gatos Downtown Traffic OperationsDATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: MEETING DATE: 2/7/00 ITEM NO. COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT February 3, 2000 MAYOR AND TOWN COUNCIL TOWN MANAGER CONSIDER TRAFFIC ENGINEER'S REPORT ON LOS GATOS DOWNTOWN "TRAFFIC OPERATIONS ;a A. IMPLEMENT RAMP METERING TO 250 VEHICLES PER HOUR B. MODIFY TRAFFIC SIGNALS AT LOS GATOS - SARATOGA ROAD WITH UNIVERSITY AVENUE AND NORTH SANTA CRUZ AVENUE TO MAKE THIS HIGHWAY ENTRANCE MORE ATTRACTIVE C. CONTINUE ALL -WAY STOP AT EAST MAIN STREET AND COLLEGE AVENUE AND INSTALL PEDESTRIAN TRAFFIC SIGNAL D. IMPLEMENT ENGINEERING DESIGN FOR TOWN PLAZA STREET IMPROVEMENTS, NORTH SANTA CRUZ AVENUE/BACHMAN AVENUE INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS AND GRAYS LANE IMPROVEMENTS RECOMMENDATION: 1. Implement ramp metering to 250 vehicles per hour. 2. Modify traffic signals at Los Gatos - Saratoga Road with University Avenue and north Santa Cruz Avenue to make this highway entrance more attractive. 3. Continue all -way stop at east Main Street and College Avenue and install pedestrian traffic signal. 4. Implement engineering design for Town Plaza street improvements, north Santa Cruz Avenue/Bachman Avenue intersection improvements and Grays Lane improvements. BACKGROUND: The Town Council has requested six traffic studies to address a variety of issues and traffic problems in response to inquiries from residents and individual Council members. Three of the six traffic studies have been completed by the Town's Traffic Engineer, Gary Kruger with TJKM Transportation Consultants, and were presented to Counci 1 on January 3, 2000. The three remaining traffic studies (i.e., Downtown Operational Traffic Study, Closure of Santa Cruz Avenue on -ramp to Highway 17, Stop signs at Main and College and Santa Cruz and Bachman) are presented with this Council report. DISCUSSION: The three traffic studies attached to this report are described below. Each of the these studies provide its own analysis and recommendation. PREPARED BY: PAUL L. CURTIS Director of Community Development c 4(/ Reviewed by: 0� Attorney Revised: 2/3/00 3:46 PM Reformatted: 7/ 14/99 S:ITRAFRPT PAGE 2 MAYOR AND TOWN COUNCIL SUBJECT: CONSIDER TRAFFIC ENGINEER'S REPORT ON LOS GATOS DOWNTOWN TRAFFIC OPERATIONS February 2, 2000 DISCUSSION: (Cont.) 1. Los Gatos Downtown Traffic Operations. - This traffic study addresses the following items and contains findings and suggested alternatives: 1) Downtown Operational Traffic Study 2) Closure or metering of Santa Cruz Avenue on ramp to Highway 17 3) Stop signs at Main Street and College Avenue 4) Stop signs at Santa Cruz Avenue and Bachman Avenue 5) Evaluation of improvements at Bachman Avenue, Grays Lane, and North Main Street at Plaza Park The following summarizes traffic issues in the downtown area with findings, and possible alternatives: 1) Key Intersections Peak traffic occurs between 4:45 and 5:45. Five signalized intersections at key intersections were evaluated and rated as "level of service" from A through F (A being the best to F being the worst). The existing signal timing at these intersections has an average "level of service" rating of D. These signal intersections can improve traffic flow at least 46% by changing the timing of the existing signals. However, optimizing signal timing may induce more traffic. Decreasing particular green Tight time at specific intersections would serve to discourage motorists from using Town streets as a cut -through route to avoid heavy congestion on Highway 17. 2) Cut -Through Traffic A license plate study was conducted to determine the number of automobiles using North Santa Cruz Avenue, University Avenue, and Los Gatos Boulevard as a cut -through to the Highway 17 entrance at South Santa Cruz Avenue. The study found 82% of all traffic is cut -through automobiles using Town streets as an alternative to using Highway 17. 3) Travel Time and Delay A travel time study showed that it is faster to use Town streets instead of Highway 17 during commute hours. Automobile commuters save 2.7 minutes by using Town streets during this time period. 4) Accidents Accident h istory of Town streets was reviewed to determ ine whether street design or traffic operations contributed to an increase number of expected accidents. Analysis of accident history shows that no specific locations are especially hazardous due to cut -through traffic. 5) Parking A parking occupancy study of Customer Only parking lots found that the peak period for parking in downtown Los Gatos is from 12:00 to 2:00 P. M. During afternoon peak hour traffic, there is a 12% increase in available parking in downtown Los Gatos. PAGE 3 MAYOR AND TOWN COUNCIL SUBJECT: CONSIDER TRAFFIC ENGINEER'S REPORT ON LOS GATOS DOWNTOWN TRAFFIC OPERATIONS February 2, 2000 DISCUSSION: (Cont.) 6) Pedestrian Crossing During peak traffic hours, there are approximately 1,000 vehicles per hour near the majority of pedestrian crossings. Although there have been no significant pedestrian -related accidents, shorter crosswalks will improve pedestrian safety. 7) A 3-Wav Stop at East Main Street at College Avenue Traffic counts support installing this 3-way stop. Immediately after installing of this 3-Way Stop Sign, traffic flow sometimes backed up. While this stop sign has created more congestion in the morning commute, it has increased pedestrian safety. An additional benefit is reduced automobile speeds near this intersection. 8) 4-Way Stop at North Santa Cruz Avenue/Bachman Avenue Stop signs at this location would delay traffic along this popular cut -through route but shift traffic to University Avenue. By placing another traffic controlling device at the intersections of University Avenue with Bachman Avenue and Royce Street, in conjunction with modifying the signal at University Avenue at Main Street, would decrease 30% of the cut -through traffic. A four-way stop is not recommended because significant congestion would be created. 9) Ramp Metering at South Santa Cruz Avenue Installing a ramp metering device to allow 250 vehicles per hour to enter Highway 17 could decrease cut -through traffic by approximately 65%. This would result in a decrease of 300 vehicles during peak traffic hours (4:45-5:45PM.) in downtown Los Gatos. An increase of 5 minutes would be added to commuters that normally use this entrance. A ramp metering device would cost approximately $20,000 - $40,000. Even if back-up occurs, the meter can be programmed to allow traffic to flow to clear the congestion. Other devices (e.g. stop signs) cannot be controlled by time nor use and are permanent (e.g. 24 hours) even when congestion is not a concern. 10) Closing the South Santa Cruz Avenue On -Ramp to Highway 17 Closing the South Santa Cruz Avenue entrance to Highway 17 would decrease cut -through traffic by approximately 460 vehicles during the peak traffic period. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: Is not a project defined under CEQA, and no further action is required. FISCAL IMPACT: None Attachments: Los Gatos Downtown Traffic Operations Study Distribution: Gary Kruger, TJKM, Traffic Consultants, 4234 Hacienda Drive, Suite 101, Pleasanton, CA 94588-2721 NiiiTransportation Cons ints MEMORANDUM January 26, 2000 To: Mr. Scott D. Alman, Town Engineer Project No.: 021-030. Task 002 Town of Los Gatos From: Subject: Gary Kruger, Town Traffic Engineer " Jurisdiction: Los Gatos Los Gatos Downtown Traffic Operations TJKM Transportation Consultants is pleased to present for your review and approval the following summary of our findings and conclusions from the Downtown Traffic Operations Study. BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES The Town Council of Los Gatos has expressed concerns regarding traffic operations in the downtown area due to a combination of a number of factors, including the additional traffic from the Old Town Project, the use of downtown streets to bypass SR 17, and the impacts of Los Gatos High School traffic on top of existing congestion. To address these concerns. the Town has retained the Town Traffic Engineer to conduct a study of downtown traffic operations. The specific objectives of the study are: • to evaluate existing traffic conditions at key intersection in the downtown area using standard traffic engineering procedures; • to identify traffic circulation deficiencies and develop potential countermeasures: • to develop and analyze measures to discourage, if not eliminate, traffic cutting through downtown to avoid SR 17; • to evaluate the proposed all -way stop control at the intersection of College and Main as a preventive measure for excessive queuing near the school; and, • to analyze various design alternatives for specific Capital Improvement Program projects. STUDY AREA AND TIME PERIODS OF INTEREST The study area, shown in Figure 1, consists of the area bounded by Santa Cruz Avenue to the west, State Route 9 (Los Gatos -Saratoga Road) to the north, Los Gatos Boulevard to the east, and Main Street to the south. The study focused on the following ten key intersections: 1. N. Santa Cruz Av/SR 9 2. N. Santa Cruz Av/Main St 3. University Av/SR 9 4. University Av/Main St 5. Los Gatos Bl/SR 9 6. SR 9/Massol Av 7. N. Santa Cruz Av/Bachman Av 8. N. Santa Cruz Av/Broadway 9. Los Gatos Bl/Loma Alta 10. Los Gatos Bl/Pleasanton St/Jackson St The time period of interest for the evaluation of existing conditions is the Friday afternoon peak period, which is the worst case scenario for traffic in both downtown Los Gatos and SR 17. 4234 Hacienda Drive, Suite 101, Pleasanton, California 94588-2721 • Phone (925)463-0611 •Pax (925)463-3690 •e-mail tjkm@tjkm.com E. MAIN ST. 10 • Study Intersection * Special Study Intersection Town of Los Gatos Downtown Operational Traffic Study Study Area Figure 1 cO CT CO ir, IN North Not to Scale TJ KN 21-030-T2 - 1 /00 - Y00 Mr. Scott D. Alman, January 26, 2000, Pg. 3 EXISTING CONDITIONS Traffic Volume, Traffic Controls, and Lane Configurations Traffic counts were conducted in the middle of November 1999, before the beginning of the holiday season. Manual turning movement counts were collected for the study area intersections during the Friday afternoon peak period (4 — 6 p.m), and machine counts were collected for the study area roadways for a 24-hour period on the same Friday. The peak hour was found to occur at 4:45 — 5:45 p.m. The peak hour and daily traffic volumes at the study area intersections and roadways are depicted in Figure 2. In addition to traffic volumes, traffic control and lane configuration information were also collected for the study intersections and are shown in Figure 3. These data, as well as existing traffic signal timing at the five signalized intersections in the study area, were used to create a traffic model of downtown Los Gatos for analysis purposes. Traffic Operations at Key Intersections Existing traffic operations at the key intersections were evaluated using the traffic model of downtown Los Gatos. The measure of performance of each intersection is the `level of service', which is based on either the average delay per vehicle entering the intersection for signalized and all -way stop controlled intersections, or the average delay per vehicle on minor movements for two-way stop -controlled intersections. Level of service is designated with the letters A through F, with A representing the least delay and F representing the worst delay. The peak hour levels of service at the study area intersections are summarized in Table 1. For comparison, Table 1 also shows the levels of service that would be expected if the signal timing at each of the signalized intersections were optimized. It should be noted that delay at unsignalized intersections may also decrease in response to changes in signal timing at adjacent signalized intersections due to the resulting changes in the traffic flow characteristics of the platoon of vehicles arriving from the signalized intersection. Intersection #1 Los Gatos -Saratoga/ N. Santa Cruz Intersect; 12 Main/N. Sa ruz Intersection #3 Los Gatos -Saratoga/ University Intr—action #4 Ma liversity Intersection #5 Los Gatos -Saratoga/ Los Gatos Intersection #6 Los Gatos -Saratoga/ Massol Intersection 47 Bachman/N. Santa Cruz Intersection #6 Broadway/N. Santa Cruz Intersection #9 Loma Alta/Los Gatos Intersection #10 E. Mair/Pleasant n4'3 40 Ari�A4 Ss "k r- Ni 68 —7If 397 ► 39 �l 1L46 41--319 pr48 N V N N Bq cy� Ai, 04 CO Q 8 ay 0 �1. 8 rtco. ] tD Cl 0�Ge 0 LEGEND XXX—//PM Peak Hour Traffic Volume YYY Daily Traffic Volume co 111 North Not to Scale Town of Los Gatos Downtown Operational Traffic Study Existing Traffic Volumes Figure 2 21-030-T2 - 1 /00 - YDO Intersection #1 Los Gatos -Saratoga/ N. Santa Cruz Intersec #2 Main/N. S. Cruz Intersection #3 Los Gatos -Saratoga/ University In, action #4 M. niversity Intersection #5 Los Gatos -Saratoga/ Los Gatos r i R� 14 Z 'a. .11....), Intersection #6 Los Gatos -Saratoga/ Massol Intersection #7 Bachman/N. Santa Cruz Intersection 48 Broadway/N. Santa Cruz Intersection #9 Loma Alta/Los Gatos Intersection #10 E. Main/Pleasant A. y 41-' � 7`� ,f I Al's fiC4 T 4 f ir Jill. 9 Q J cc 7- /Q ,�1J2�AT�%IDA At uss 17 AIrF .4. �� �P s m�" 9 Cp�9 CT9 yL 5 co North Not to Scale egCy�fr,O.. co MANS eRpAOwAy 6 yR 6 RAYS L �NQI-F '4MST y. 3 02 T �e 4 8 w y� G, C ON' v �. cr co Nr a * I E. MAIN ST. 10 y N O Z LEGEND • Study Intersection STraffic Signal Control -a-STOP Sign Control Town of Los Gatos Downtown Operational Traffic Study Existing Traffic Control and Intersection Geometrics Figure 3 21-030-T2- 1/00- YDO Mr. Scott D. Alman, Janua*v 26, 2000, Pg. 6 Table 1: Peak Hour Intersection Levels of Service - Existing Conditions SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS ID Intersection Existing Signal Timing Optimized Signal Timing Delay, sec/veh LOS Delay, sec/veh LOS 1 N. Santa Cruz Av/SR 9 28 D 25 C 2 N. Santa Cruz Av/ Main St 34 D 20 C 3 University Av/SR 9 >60 F 33 D 4 University Av/Main St >60 F 9 B 5 Los Gatos BI/SR 9 19 C 17 C UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS ID Intersection Existing Signal Timing Optimized Signal Timing Delay, LOS Delay, LOS sec/veh sec/veh 6 SR 9/Massol Av WB Left 13 B 13 B NB Approach 26 D 26 D 7 N. Santa Cruz Av/Bachman Av NB Left 9 A 9 A SB Left 8 A 8 A WB Approach 21 C 21 C EB Approach 58 F 58 F 8 N. Santa Cruz Av/Broadway NB Left 9 A 9 A WB Approach 17 C 17 C EB Approach 24 C 24 C 9 Los Gatos BI/Loma Alta 51 F 51 F 10 Los Gatos BI/Pleasant St/Jackson St 29 D 29 D Note: LOS = Level of Service As evidenced by the results of the intersection level of service analysis, significant improvements in delay can be achieved by optimizing signal timing at the signalized intersections. It is not always desirable to optimize signal timing, however, as it may induce more traffic to use a particular route. In the case of the traffic signal at University Avenue and Main Street, the minimal green time allotted to the southbound approach serves to discourage motorists from using University Avenue as a cut -through route to avoid congestion along State Route 17. Mr. Scott D. Alman, Janu--,/ 27, 2000, Pg. 7 Cut -Through Traffic A license plate study was conducted to determine the magnitude of traffic using N. Santa Cruz Avenue, University Avenue, and Los Gatos Boulevard to bypass the congestion along State Route 17. The license plate study involved stationing people at the entrance points into downtown Los Gatos and at the exit point from downtown Los Gatos at the N. Santa Cruz Avenue on -ramp to State Route 17 to collect the numbers of license plates. The numbers observed at the entrance points were then matched to those observed at the exit point. As a check, the observation times are also recorded to ensure that the amount of time that has elapsed from one observation at an entrance point to the same observation at the exit point is at least equal to the travel time between those two points. The results of the license plate study are depicted in Figure 4. The data shown on the figure represent the percentage of traffic on the roadway segment that elects to enter State Route 17 via the N. Santa Cruz Avenue on -ramp, rather than via the State Route 9 on -ramps that are closer. Travel Time and Delay A travel time study was conducted to compare the attractiveness of using, N. Santa Cruz Avenue, University Avenue, and Los Gatos Boulevard as bypass routes for State Route 17. The results of the travel time study are also used later on to evaluate the impacts of proposed countermeasures that would discourage cut -through traffic. The travel time study involved driving along the bypass routes, as well as State Route 17, and noting the time of arrival at various control points and the delay incurred as a result of traffic signals, all -way stops, being queued up behind left -turning vehicles, motorists attempting to park, or pedestrians crossing the street. As illustrated in Figure 5, the routes were evaluated for travel time and delay between Lark Avenue and southbound State Route 17 at the N. Santa Cruz Avenue on -ramp. Owing to the changes in traffic characteristics along the routes as you approach downtown Los Gatos, the travel time and delay data north of State Route 9 were analyzed separately from those south of State Route 9. Table 2 presents the results of the travel time and delay study for the portion of each of the four routes that is north of State Route 9. Figures 6 and 7 graphically illustrate the average travel speeds and average running speeds along the same four routes. Table 3 and Figures 8 and 9 provide the same information for the portion of the routes that is south of State Route 9. As evidenced by the results of the travel time and delay study, north of State Route 9, there is incentive for motorists to use Winchester Boulevard/N. Santa Cruz Avenue, University Avenue, and Los Gatos Boulevard as bypass routes for State Route 17 due to the higher travel speeds and running speeds along those routes. This is not the case for the portion of University Avenue and Los Gatos Boulevard south of State Route 9, where the travel speeds are about the same as that on State Route 17, and for the portion of N. Santa Cruz Avenue south of State Route 9, where the travel speed is actually lower than that on State Route 17. Taken as a whole from Lark Avenue to the State Route 17 on -ramp at N. Santa Cruz Avenue, the most attractive route appears to be University Avenue, with an average trip time of 9.8 minutes, followed by Los Gatos Boulevard with 11.4 minutes, then N. Santa Cruz Avenue with 11.6 minutes, and finally by State Route 17 with 12.5 minutes. -- Intersection #1 Los Gatos -Saratoga/ N. Santa Cruz Intersect !2 Main/N. Sa. Intersection #3 Los Gatos -Saratoga/ University Int ction #4 Ma liversity Intersection #5 Los Gatos -Saratoga/ Los Gatos 0 Intersection #6 Los Gatos -Saratoga/ Massol Intersection #7 Bachman/N. Santa Cruz Intersection #H Broadway/N. Santa Cruz Intersection #9 Loma Alta/Los Gatos Intersection #10 E. Main/Pleasant X f70 LEGEND XXX-'PM Peak Hour Traffic Volume North Not to Scale Town of Los Gatos Downtown Operational Traffic Study Cut -Through Traffic Figure 4 21-030-T2 - 1100 - YDO / ♦ • • / / / / Route 1 • ♦ / / ♦• / / , / / / ,• , / , / / ♦ , / ♦ , / • / ♦ • / 11 eI/ .4 C/ 11.1 r \te 8 / r • a Qy 1 I 2 I 9l / / • nSS999). ,'/ ♦ Route 4 4 '9d --sN4t,, / Route 3Th4♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ Route 2; 6�= xs,\J1- RD. ! • • • ` ♦♦ MAIN ST. / I II North Not to Scale Town of Los Gatos Downtown Operational Traffic Study Travel Time and Delay Study Routes Figure 5 21-030-T2 - 1/00 - YDO m CIZS E Q 1) a) a) QD O Z � O cc Route 1 - via Winchester/N. Santa Cruz M (0 O D) CO O Qj N (V 1— (D co t-- 00 co M O X) (0 4- 0) C ▪ ) CV N CN T (V (O c6 O M N N D ( N C'7 0 O M cO ti N M ri ' O rn co a) O) co M t� (' (so (() CO C N O O t� (() c() ti ti CO CO (p Winchester/N. Santa Cruz (Lark - SR 9) ti L0 (0 Lt) (C) (C) LC) O (C) ((0 O Route 3 - via SR 17 N SR 17 (Lark Off -Ramp - SR 9 On -Ramp) Route 4 - via Los Gatos BI/Main Los Gatos BI (Lark - SR 9) - Used data for travel time runs along Winchester/N, Santa Cruz 95% C.I. - 95% confidence interval Std. Dev. - standard deviation Figure 6: Travel Speed Comparison - North of State Route 9 0 CD 0 0 0 0 c 0 0 0 0 00 CSD co (0 r—r— ydw `paadg ianeil a6eJany CO u) 0 is CD 0 N. Santa Cruz a.$ 0 Ct Figure 7: Running Speed Comparison - North of State Route 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sri o Sri o Sri o CO N N Ow 'pads 6uiuutmi a6eJany CO 0 io cn 0 N. Santa Cruz m 0 Table 3: Summary of Travel Time and Delay Study - South of State Route 9 a) a) OC a) i) Q) O O CC a) O CC co N E Route 1 - via N. Santa Cruz r co N ' v v ca Co co co ' N CD N CO N CO Lci CO O) OO cr.; N CS) M N CD M N CO N to ' Lo CO N Cp O O ' CD M N r CD to (0 (0 ' CO r- V O CC) CC) OD t-- c) cc; CC) 0 Ln LC) o r r o CD C ) N N N CO CC). - CO CO CO N r- CO v CO CO CO cc> ' O co co N c� c ) Cb e- N C\I O O) CO N r N Lo cD CO LC) CO (0 CO CO CO N co ' CO V CO CJ O r (0 CO O CO C M r er Lo Co to LC) LC) U7 LC') LC) LC) (0 LO CO O O O N. Santa Cruz (SR 9 - Main) O I` i` Lo o N OD O O O () LC) LO N N O O CII �II tE N co CC CC Cl)-.-. u) ' -, �cn Z N C CC 'y NI U m ›, . U c .( ? c CO Cr) CCS N > a U) d E co z O= 2 Z CC Route 3 - via SR 17 SR 17 (SR 9 Off -Ramp - N. Santa Cruz On -Ramp) Route 4 - via Los Gatos BI/Main N U co c co U) Z co d' co Co c 0 'Es 2 m rn U o - m c en en cc) 0 - Z 95% C.I. - 95% confidence interval Note: Std. Dev. - standard deviation Figure 8: Travel Speed Comparison - South of State Route 9 Ow 'pads lam! a5eJaAV N- (J7 CI) 0 N. Santa Cruz 0 0 Figure 9: Running Speed Comparison - South of State Route 9 O O O O O O LC5 O CN CN Ow 'pads 6u!uunN a6eJany m N 0 CCS 0 J ti Cr V7 CV c N. Santa Cruz O ce Mr. Scott D. Alman, Jamy.>ry 26, 2000, Pg. 16 Accidents The accident history was reviewed for the ten study intersections and the segment of N. Santa Cruz and University Avenues from State Route 9 to Main Street for the 3 1/2-year period between January 1, 1996 to June 30, 1999. Traffic engineers use two methods to detect whether street design or traffic operations are contributing to a higher than expected number of accidents: number of accidents per million miles of travel for street segments and number of accidents per million entering vehicles for intersections. Accident rates may vary from year to year due to chance variations in the numbers of accidents. To assess whether an accident rate is significantly higher than would be expected due to chance, the "upper control limit" (UCL) is calculated. Accident rates found to exceed this limit are considered to be caused by street design and traffic operations factors rather than chance variation. Tables 4 and 5 show the average accident rates for the study intersections and streets, as well as the average accident rates for similar facilities in the State of California, as published by Caltrans. The analysis reveals that there are no locations that could be considered to be especially hazardous, and generally, no further investigation of hazard appears warranted. Parking A parking occupancy study was conducted for N. Santa Cruz Avenue, Station Road, and University Avenue between State Route 9 and Main Street on a hourly basis from 9:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. in the middle of November 1999, before the beginning of the holiday season. Data were collected for Customer Only parking lots, on -street public parking, and off-street public parking, which amounted to a total of 1,449 available parking spaces in the downtown Los Gatos area. Figure 10 summarizes the findings from the parking occupancy study. As evidenced by the results of the study, the peak period for parking in downtown Los Gatos occurs from 12:00 — 2:00 p.m., when occupancy of on -street public parking exceeds 90% and occupancy of the Customer Only, on -street public parking, and off-street public parking, combined, exceeds 70%. During the afternoon peak hour of traffic on the study area roadways, the occupancy of on -street public parking is about 85% and Customer Only, on -street public parking, and off- street public parking, combined, is about 58%. The relatively high occupancy of on -street public parking was taken into account in the traffic model by including the estimated number of parking maneuvers along specific segments of N. Santa Cruz and University Avenues. Pedestrian Crossing The average traffic volume during the afternoon peak hour on N. Santa Cruz Avenue between State Route 9 and Main Street, where the majority of pedestrian crossings occur, is about 1,000 vehicles per hour. The average crosswalk width is 34 feet, which requires a crossing time of about 8.5 seconds at a walking speed of 4 feet per second. At this traffic volume and crossing time, it is estimated that there would be one safe crossing gap of 8.5 seconds every two minutes. Although no significant pedestrian -related accidents have been noted in the review of the accident history along N. Santa Cruz Avenue, the Town's efforts to create shorter crosswalks by providing bulb - outs at crosswalk locations has probably enhanced pedestrian safety in the downtown area. Table 4: Summary of Accident Analysis - Intersections a) U a 0] N O U U a co m z o a W Q O DC _c) o U W U Annual Enter H O C„,„j Q N CO CO CO O O co; O O M N 0 N CO N 07) u) u) in 4 cocoN N Z.:;. N O O O O O O O O O U) O r N O) r CO O CO Q) N Cf) N N O O O O O ti M N CO CV `— CCV 0O O N O0 O M m O N O 00 CO O CO O CO CO Csi CD M CC) 00 (D V V N 0) co 1` N cO o0 Q) C") O C() 1� co V CO 00 O M CO C) 0) N 1— CV (0 Ma— M OT N N a— �"- ..-- O O O O O O O O O O CO O O O O O O O O O O CO 1` O N 1— C)) N N M M Q in in o O) C a) C O) v) CC ca Cr co CC ca 00 2 to 2 cn 2 N. Santa Cruz Av N. Santa Cruz Av Q Q m 7 i U rn C „ E p J U) Bachman Av N. Santa Cruz Av N. Santa Cruz Av Pleasant St/Jackson St CO 0 0 J J O Table 5: Summary of Accident Analysis - Street Segments J 0) rn m cu as CC 1- E O csJ co CO CO O I� N N N 'Y) (00 CO O O CO CD 0('') CO O 0 0) CC (J) CJ7 N. Santa Cruz Av Figure 10: Summary of Parking Occupancy Study 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0-3, O COO O O N O O pa!dnaap }ua3Jad E a N C6 E ca O O O E O O Mr. Scott D. Alman, Jam, 26, 2000, Pg. 20 n IMPROVEMENT ALTERNATIVES A number of alternatives have been identified for the primary purpose of improving vehicular and pedestrian safety and circulation in the downtown area by discouraging the use of downtown streets as a bypass for State Route 17. The alternatives, in order of severity of anticipated impacts on existing circulation patterns, are: • install all -way stop control at the intersection of N. Santa Cruz Avenue and Bachman Avenue; • implement ramp metering at the N. Santa Cruz Avenue on -ramp to State Route 17; and, • close the N. Santa Cruz Avenue on -ramp to State Route 17. Each of the alternatives are directed toward decreasing the traffic volume on N. Santa Cruz Avenue, and as such, is expected to result in fewer accidents and more adequate gaps for pedestrian crossing. However, each of the alternatives will also reroute significant traffic onto State Route 17 via the State Route 9 on -ramps, which will effectively move the afternoon peak period bottleneck from the N. Santa Cruz Avenue on -ramp to the State Route 9 on -ramp, potentially causing queues to extend northward into the City of Campbell, where they do not now exist. Methodology The methodology used to determine the impacts of each alternative involved determining the magnitude of traffic that would be rerouted as a result of the additional delay imposed by the proposed improvements. The magnitude of rerouted traffic was estimated by progressively displacing traffic in increments of 20% from the route that they currently use onto an alternative route to State Route 17, and then calculating and comparing the total trip time along both routes. The precise magnitude of rerouted traffic is then the percentage that results in approximately equivalent trip times along the current and alternative routes. Install All -Way Stop at N. Santa Cruz Avenue/Bachman Avenue The installation of an all -way stop at the intersection of N. Santa Cruz Avenue and Bachman Avenue would increase the delay along N. Santa Cruz Avenue, thereby making the roadway a less desirable bypass route for State Route 17. However, with the installation of any restricting traffic control device, it is anticipated that traffic will simply shift over to the nearest, less restricted route, which in this case would be University Avenue. In order to avoid simply shifting the problem along N. Santa Cruz Avenue onto University Avenue, it is therefore necessary to implement similar countermeasures that would induce a comparable amount of delay on University Avenue. The recommended countermeasures that would achieve this desired effect is the installation of all -way stop control along the intersections of University Avenue with Bachman Avenue and Royce Street, and setting the signal timing at the intersection of University Avenue and Main Street to provide at most 30 seconds of green time for the southbound approach. The implementation of the above improvements is anticipated to result in a decrease of approximately 30% of the cut -through traffic from State Route 9, N. Santa Cruz Avenue, and University Avenue, for a total of about 100 less vehicles during the peak hour using downtown Los Gatos streets. The resulting trip times along N. Santa Cruz Avenue and University Avenue are expected to increase by about 2 minutes. The intersection levels of service under the all -way stop alternative are shown in Table 6. The number of safe pedestrian crossing gaps for N. Santa Cruz Avenue is expected to increase to one every 1 %2 minutes under this alternative. Mr. Scott D. Alman, Jan" ry 26, 2000, Pg. 21 Table 6: Peak Hour Intersection Levels of Service — All -Way Stop Alternative SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS ID Intersection Optimized Signal Timing All -Way Stop Altemative Delay, Delay, sec/veh LOS sec/veh LOS 1 N. Santa Cruz Av/SR 9 25 C 25 C 2 N. Santa Cruz Av/ Main St 20 C 16 C 3 University Av/SR 9 33 D 32 D 4 University AvlMain St 9 B 26 D 5 Los Gatos BI/SR 9 17 C 17 C UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS ID Intersection Optimized Signal Timing All -Way Stop Alternative Delay, sec/veh LOS Delay, sec/veh LOS 6 SR 9/Massol Av WB Left 13 B 13 B NB Approach 26 D 26 D 7 N. Santa Cruz Av/Bachman Av Two -Way Stop NB Left 9 A SB Left 8 A WB Approach 21 C EB Approach 58 F All -Way Stop 64 F 8 N. Santa Cruz Av/Broadway NB Left 9 A 9 A WB Approach 17 C 15 B EB Approach 24 C 20 C 9 Los Gatos BI/Loma Alta 51 F 51 F 10 Los Gatos BI/Pleasant St/Jackson St 29 D 29 D * University Av/Bachman Av 27 D * University Av/Royce St 20 0 Note: LOS = Level of Service Mr. Scott D. Alman, Jan"3ry 26, 2000, Pg. 22 Implement Ramp Metering at the N. Santa Cruz Avenue On -Ramp to State Route 17 The implementation of ramp metering at the N. Santa Cruz Avenue on -ramp to State Route 17 at a metering rate of approximately 250 vehicles per hour, the lowest metering rate that Caltrans allows, is anticipated to result in a decrease of approximately 65% of the cut -through traffic from State Route 9, N. Santa Cruz Avenue, University Avenue, and Los Gatos Boulevard, for a total of about 300 less vehicles during the peak hour using downtown Los Gatos streets. The resulting trip times along N. Santa Cruz Avenue, University Avenue, and Los Gatos Boulevard are expected to increase by about 4 to 5 minutes. The intersection levels of service under the ramp metering alternative are shown in Table 7. The number of safe crossing pedestrian crossing gaps for N. Santa Cruz Avenue is expected to increase to 1.8 per minute under this alternative. Close the N. Santa Cruz Avenue On -Ramp to State Route 17 The closure of the N. Santa Cruz Avenue on -ramp to State Route 17 will completely eliminate all cut -through traffic from State Route 9, N. Santa Cruz Avenue, University Avenue, and Los Gatos Boulevard, for a total of about 460 less vehicles during the peak hour using downtown Los Gatos streets. The intersection levels of service under the ramp closure alternative are shown in Table 8. The number of safe crossing pedestrian crossing gaps for N. Santa Cruz Avenue is expected to increase to 2.6 per minute under this alternative. A summary of the intersection levels of service under each improvement alternative is provided in Table 9. Mr. Scott D. Alman, Jani' ry 26, 2000, Pg. 23 Table 7: Peak Hour Intersection Levels of Service — Ramp Meter Alternative SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS ID Intersection Optimized Signal Timing Ramp Meter Alternative Delay, sec/veh LOS Delay, sec/veh LOS 1 N. Santa Cruz Av/SR 9 25 C 26 D 2 N. Santa Cruz Av/ Main St 20 C 13 B 3 University Av/SR 9 33 D 33 D 4 University Av/Main St 9 B 8 B 5 Los Gatos BI/SR 9 17 C 15 C UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS ID Intersection Optimized Signal Timing Ramp Meter Alternative Delay, LOS Delay, LOS sec/veh sec/veh 6 SR 9/Massol Av WB Left 13 B 13 B NB Approach 26 D 26 D 7 N. Santa Cruz Av/Bachman Av Two -Way Stop NB Left 9 A SB Left 8 A WB Approach 21 C EB Approach 58 F 8 N. Santa Cruz Av/Broadway NB Left WB Approach EB Approach 9 Los Gatos BI/Loma Alta 10 Los Gatos Bl/Pleasant St/Jackson St 9 17 24 51 29 A C C F 9 A 8 A 17 C 36 E 8 A 13 B 15 C 33 D 23 C Note: LOS = Level of Service Mr. Scott D. Alman, January 26, 2000, Pg. 24 Table 8: Peak Hour Intersection Levels of Service — Ramp Closure Alternative SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS ID Intersection Optimized Signal Timing Ramp Closure Alternative Delay, sec/veh LOS Delay, sec/veh LOS 1 N. Santa Cruz Av/SR 9 25 C 29 D 2 N. Santa Cruz Av/ Main St 20 C 13 B 3 University Av/SR 9 33 D 38 D 4 University Av/Main St 9 B 9 B 5 Los Gatos BIISR 9 17 C 15 C UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS ID ' Intersection Optimized Signal Timing Ramp Closure Alternative Delay, LOS Delay, LOS sec/veh sec/veh 6 SR 9IMassol Av WB Left 13 B 13 B NB Approach 26 D 27 D 7 N. Santa Cruz Av/Bachman Av Two -Way Stop NB Left 9 A 8 A SB Left 8 A 8 A WB Approach 21 C 15 C EB Approach 58 F 30 D 8 N. Santa Cruz AvlBroadway NB Left 9 A 7 A WB Approach 17 C 11 B EB Approach 24 C 11 B 9 Los Gatos BI/Loma Alta 51 F 35 D 10 Los Gatos BI/Pleasant St/Jackson St 29 D 22 C Note: LOS = Level of Service INTERSECTIONS Mr. Scott D. Alman, January 26, 2000, Pg. 25 Optimized Timing Existing Signal Timing co N 0 co Q) 0 0) 0 J 0 CO 0 CO U N r- 1.000 0 CO 0 CCt 0 N CO 0 0 0 0 0 LC) CO N CO COr- N CA • U 0 0:1 LC) O CO CT N N M N 0 u_ u_ U COCOD CO cO A A N. Santa Cruz Av/SR 9 N. Santa Cruz Av/ Main St University AvISR 9 University AvlMain St Los Gatos BI/SR 9 N Cr) UNSIGNAL!ZED INTERSECTIONS 0 U 1 co Q co co 1 O 0) Optimized Timing Existing Signal Timing 0 CO O J 0 0 J (moo Q) 0 CO O CZ 0 C7 0 J ro 0 0 0 J s, co CO «00 , <Q CO 0 U N CO CO t•v- LC) CV (") N OD QQU W <CD0 0 0 CO _ CO LC) C") M CA 0 0 M cc,C") CO CD 0 u- Q CO O u_ 0 0 U C) CO d' C.)O 0) I- CD N ' ' ' CO CV LC) N CV N CO 0 Q Q U U- Q 0 0 LL 0 CO (O O) COc0 O) �t O i CACAU') N Ln N 000 QQUu- QUU u- 0 N O CO C C O N Q U C >_ CO (O co L co�co - U O Q co CC) CO CO Cr) t ? .G ▪ E CO Q CJ• =▪ b Q CZ (O U O CONI D- O =/O 0=O CO CO a3 () 0 ▪ O -IQ c6 ro J J¢ Q t` J¢ Q CO CIO co cn 3zu) w. coz�12121 w (n (n CC U) Z~ Q Z J J CO f� 00 University Av/Bachman Av Mr. Scott D. Alman, J' iary 26, 2000, Pg. 26 Special Study: Evaluation of All -Way Stop at E. Main Street and College Avenue Traffic counts were conducted at this intersection to assess whether all -way stop control is warranted under Caltrans guidelines. These guidelines include a consideration of minimum entering volumes over eight hours a day, minimum entering volumes from the minor street, and the number of preventable accidents per year should all -way stop control be installed. The minimum number of entering vehicles per hour should exceed 500 for any eight hours; the intersection meets this criterion. However, the second criterion requires at least 200 "units" per hour entering from the minor street where units mean vehicles plus pedestrians. The maximum entering volume per hour from College Avenue is less than 100, so this part of the warrant is less than 50% met. The final criterion, preventable accidents, requires at least five accidents per year. This intersection averaged only 1.7 accidents/year prior to the installation of all -way stops, so this criterion is only 35% met. A review of these accidents, however, reveals that in all except one, vehicles were stopped on Main Street, most likely for crossing pedestrians. There is insufficient detail in the summary accident data to assess this, but stopping for pedestrians is the most likely cause of vehicles stopping at the intersection prior to the installation of stop signs (and being rear - ended by following cars or bikes). Field checks were made during the busy morning commute hours to assess the contribution of the new all -way stop control to congestion on Main Street. From 7:30 a.m. to 7:40 a.m. the hourly flow rate for eastbound Main Street reached 700/hour while the westbound flows were only 350/hour. Traffic backed to University Avenue during this time. By 7:41 a.m. traffic had backed all the way to Santa Cruz Avenue and around the corner south of Main Street for northbound Santa Cruz Avenue. By 7:45 a.m., however, the backup had completely cleared. During the maximum backup frustrated drivers tended to roll through the stop sign. Between, 1% and 2% of all eastbound drivers rolled through from 5 to 10 mph, generally because the second and third car in line just followed the leading car through the intersection. During this time these drivers also violated pedestrians' right of way. At 7:45 a.m. westbound traffic became the heavy flow and backups of over 500 feet to the east formed. By 7:55 a.m., however, this westbound queue had cleared entirely. Generally, the excessive congestion caused by the new all -way stop control affects traffic for less than 30 minutes in the morning commute. We did not observe similar backups in the afternoon and evening peak hours. Main Street in this area is called upon the perform many functions including uses as a parking lot, and as access to recreation, shopping and eating along with the typical functions of an arterial street (e.g., moving large volumes of through traffic). Because Main Street cannot perform all functions well, there are necessary compromises to the operation and functioning of the street. The intersection serves a significant number of pedestrians, with about 50 per hour crossing the street during during the day. The sharp horizontal curve just to the west results in inadequate sight distance for pedestrians crossing from the north curb to the south curb. This has likely caused many cars to stop unexpectedly, and could "explain" the typical accident at this intersection. Our interpretation is that pedestrians are especially at hazard at this location, and stop control is needed for Main Street to offset the inadequate sight distance to the west. The very high peaking of volumes during the morning commute as well as the relatively high volumes during the day all but eliminates any safe crossing gap for pedestrians as well. Mr. Scott D. Alman, Ja' ry 26, 2000, Pg. 27 The overriding need at this location is to reduce or eliminate the sight distance problem for crossing pedestrians. The speed of traffic may also be a concern, but because of the sharp horizontal curve, speeds prior to the installation of the all -way stop could not have been too excessive. There are three possible solutions to the sight distance problem for pedestrians ranging from a small to quite large cost. The small cost solution is to retain the present all -way stop control even though the stop signs do not meet warrants. There are safety benefits for pedestrians at the expense of unnecessary stops for up to 98% of all traffic entering the intersection. A secondary benefit from the all -way stop is the slowing of traffic in the vicinity of College Avenue, but this may be offset by the additional pollution resulting from stopping all vehicles at the intersection. The second alternative would be the installation of a pedestrian signal that only stops traffic on Main Street when a pedestrian actuates the signal. This would solve the pedestrian safety problem and all but eliminate the issue of congestion and additional air pollution created by unnecessarily stopping cars at the present all -way stop. A pedestrian signal could be installed at minimal cost, and could be designed in such a way to fit in with the appearance of the signal at University Avenue and Main Street to the west. The location does not meet pedestrian signal warrants, but the sight distance problem is sufficiently serious so that the pedestrian signal could be justified on this basis. We do not consider restricting pedestrian crossings at this location to be a reasonable response to the issue of pedestrian safety. The third alternative would be the installation of a full traffic signal at this location. A traffic signal is not warranted, however, under any of the accepted warrants published by Caltrans. Because a full traffic signal would be considerably more expensive than a pedestrian signal, this is not as desirable a solution. The all -way stop solution represents an interim solution at best, and we recommend the installation of a pedestrian traffic signal at this location when funds permit. Regardless of the lack of warrants for an all -way stop, our recommendation is to retain the all -way stop control for the time being. The short period of congestion in the morning commute is more than offset by the increased safety for pedestrians at this location. Mr. Scott D. Alman, Jane' " 26, 2000, Pg. 28 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PROJECTS The Town Council has requested the independent review of three Capital Improvement Program projects in the downtown area to determine their impacts on traffic operations and pedestrian circulation. The three projects are: ▪ the Town Plaza street improvements; • N. Santa Cruz Avenue/Bachman Avenue intersection improvements; and, • Grays Lane improvements. The conceptual design for each improvement was developed by landscape architect, Paul Rodrigues, and approved by the Town Council. Alternative conceptual designs have been developed by the Town's Engineering staff to enhance the original concept and use the projects as opportunities to further improve circulation and mitigate sub -standard designs. The following presents a qualitative assessment of alternative improvements from a traffic engineering perspective. Town Plaza Street Improvements Figures 11, 12, and 13 depict Santa Cruz Avenue between Main Street and Broadway in its existing configuration, under the architect's concept, and under the engineer's concept, respectively. The proposed improvement itself, irrespective of the architect's or the engineer's concept, removes one traffic lane on the northbound side, reducing the available storage for northbound right turns from the existing 250 feet (the length of the block) to about 160 feet at best, or 80 feet at worst. The elimination of one lane of traffic would likely cause queues to form past Broadway and the level of service (LOS) for the northbound approach would likely deteriorate from the existing LOS D to LOS E. In terms of traffic operations, the engineer's design is recommended over the architect's design for the following reasons: • it provides for shorter crosswalks at both intersections of Santa Cruz Avenue with Main Street and Broadway, which would enhance both pedestrian safety and traffic signal efficiency; • it takes away less capacity at the intersection of Santa Cruz Avenue with Main Street by changing the requirement for northbound right turns from a full stop on red with a yield, and by allowing for greater storage for northbound right turns by moving the bus stop further south; • it adds capacity at the intersection of Santa Cruz Avenue and Broadway by striping an additional lane on the westbound approach; and, • it promotes traffic safety by eliminating the centerline offset. The only disadvantage associated with the engineer's design is that it eliminates two parking spaces on the east side of Santa Cruz Avenue, but the trade-off is the provision of additional right - turn lane storage. LEGEND FACE BACK CF CURS. CUTTER DRIVEWAY RASP KAWICAP RAMP PAR<NG BALL NO SCALE BROADWAY 1 + W. MAIN STREET EXISTING CONFIGURATION LEGEND FACESACX OF CURS, GUTTER TO BE RD.COVED DOSTTXS OR PROPOSED FACE RAC% OF CURS, GUTTER DR, SWAY RAMP FLAW CAP RW.W PAJDCP G STALL TEES STREET IMPROVEMENTS IN THIS AREA ARE CURRENTLY IN THE DESIGN PROCESS BY CONSULTANTS WORKING FOR THE TOLL HOUSE HOTEL THE PRELIMINARY DESIGN IS SHOWN ALONG WITH THE EXISTING STRIPING. BROADWAY STREET IMPROVEMENTS IN THIS AREA ARE CURRENTLY IN 111E DESIGN PROCESS BY CONSULTANTS WORKING FOR THE TOLL HOUSE HOTEL. THE PRELIMINARY DESIGN IS SHOWN ALONG WITH THE EXISTING STRIPING. Mr. Scott D. Alman, Jar ,ry 26, 2000, Pg. 32 N. Santa Cruz Avenue/Bachman Avenue Intersection Improvements Figures 14 through 18 depict the intersection of N. Santa Cruz Avenue with Bachman Avenue in its existing configuration, under the architect's concept, and under the engineer's three alternative concepts. The purpose of the proposed improvement is to mitigate the motorist confusion that occurs at the intersection as a result of the offset between the east and west legs. Both the landscape architect's and the engineer's designs result in better alignment of the east and west legs, as well as shorter crosswalks that would enhance pedestrian safety. The architect's design results in the following disadvantages: • it reduces the capacity of the westbound leg by eliminating one approach lane; • it maintains the location of the crosswalk on the north leg of the intersection beyond immediate visibility to westbound right -turning traffic; • the bus stop at the southwest corner of the intersection is moved into the southbound traffic lane, which will cause blockage, where it does not now exist; and, • the proposed delineation for the westbound approach lane still results in some overlap with the delineation for the eastbound approach. Of the three designs proposed by the engineer, the preferred alternative is design #1, which will provide additional capacity at all legs of the intersection, move the crosswalk on the north leg further south where it would be immediately visible to westbound right -turning traffic, and keep the bus stop at a location where it will not impede southbound traffic. A minor modification to this alternative, which would result in the more standard intersection layout of aligned opposing left turn pockets, is shown in Figure 19. The proposed modification should not cause significant deterioration in the level of service for the westbound right turns due to the minor volume of the westbound through movement. Grays Lane Improvements Figures 20 through 23 depict the intersection of Grays Lane and N. Santa Cruz Avenue in its existing configuration, under the architect's concept, and under the engineer's two alternative concepts. The proposed improvements consist of converting Grays Lane to a one-way street in the westbound direction and providing bulbouts on N. Santa Cruz Avenue at its intersection with Grays Lane to create shorter crosswalks. Although there is not a significant volume of traffic on Grays Lane, its designation as a one-way street would be disruptive to the existing circulation patterns, thereby potentially causing motorist confusion at least within the first few months of the implementation of the restriction, and will make access to the large parking lot between N. Santa Cruz Avenue and Station Way circuitous. In terms of the alternatives, the preferred alternative is the engineer's design alternative #2, which will provide shorter crosswalks for N. Santa Cruz Avenue and six additional parking spaces along Grays Lane, including a parking space for disabled people that would be in compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act. LEGEND FACE /BACK OF CURB, GUTTER DRIVEWAY RAMP V HANDICAP RAMP } PARKING STALL TEES N. SANTA CRUZ AVE. z 0 SANTA CRUZ / BACHMAN INTERSECTION EXISTING CONFIGURATION rel4 xxae FIGURE 14 LEGEND 1 1• FACEJBALt( OF CURB, GUTTER TO BE REMOVED EXISTING OR PROPOSED FACE (BACK OF CURB, GUTTER DRIVEWAY RAMP HANDICAP RAMP PARKING STALL TEES N.SANTA CRUZ AVE. teif SANTA CRUZ / BACHMAN INTERSECTION LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT'S DESIGN .1., fc rrcu FIGURE 15 LEGEND FACE/BACK OF CURB, GUTTER TO BE REMOVED EXISTING OR PROPOSED FACE BACK OF CURB, GUTTER EXISTING OR PROPOSED DRIVEWAY RAMP EXISTING DRIVEWAY RAMP TO BE RELOCATED PARKING STALL TEES N. SANTA CRUZAVE. ei 41, SANTA CRUZ / BACHMAN INTERSECTION ENGINEER'S DESIGN #1 whin 1.4.1.134.1]C 4ax FIGURE 15 LEGEND FACE/BACK OF CURB. GUTTER TO BE REMOVED ii PROPOSE DR ` PROPOSED FACE -• . J\' BACK OF CURB. GUTTER 1 ' EXISTING OR PROPOSED DRIVEWAY RAMP �%' EXISTING �^'` DRIVEWAY RAMP �. �J` TO BE RELOCATED HANDICAP RAMP PARKING STALL TEES v( \ Q co _ N. SANTA CRUZ AVE. dri SANTA CRUZ / BACHMAN INTERSECTION ENGINEER'S DESIGN #2 LEGEND FACE/BACK OF CURB, GUTTER TO BE REMOVED EXISTING OR PROPOSFO FACE /BACK OF CURB, GUTTER EXISTING OR PROPOSED DRIVEWAY RAMP EXISTING DRIVEWAY RAMP TO BE RELOCATED PARKING STALL TEES N. SANTA CRUZ AVE. te'/-‘11 SANTA CRUZ / BACHMAN INTERSECTION ENGINEER'S DESIGN #3 FIGURE 18 LEGEND FACE/BACK OF CURB. GUTTER TO BE REMOVED EXISTING OR PROPOSED FACE /BACK OF CURB, GUTTER EXISTING OR PROPOSED DRIVEWAY RAMP EXISTING DRIVEWAY RAMP TO BE RFIOCATED PARKING STALL TEES N. SANTA CRUZ AVE. _. •sc -. 'c u \c SANTA CRUZ / BACHMAN INTERSECTION Mmi-F;g1ENGINEER`S DESIGN #1 4)..n au.a M ..a u FIGURE 19 LEGE FACE/BACK OF CURB AND GUTTER DRIVEWAY RAMP HANDICAP RAMP PARKING STALL TEES TREES t 1 1 1 N. SANTA CRUZ AVE. GRAYS LANE EXISTING CONFIGURATION Ptv FIGURE Zo LEGE D FACE/BACK OF CURB AND GUTTER TO BE REMOVED EXISTING OR PROPOSED FACET BACK OF CURB AND GUTTER DRIVEWAY RAMP HANDICAP RAMP PARKING STALL TEES 1 Landscape architect's design does not show details of transition to existing curb N. SANTA CRUZ AVE. GRAYS LANE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT'S DESIGN'FIGURE 2c LEG JD k FACEIBACK OF CURB AND GUTTER TO BE REMOVED EXISTING OR PROPOSED FACE/ BACK OF CURB AND GUI I tR EXISTING DRIVEWAY RAMP EXISTING OR PROPOSED HANDICAP RAMP PARKING STALL TEES ! 1 ! N. SANTA C UZ AVE. GRAYS LANE ENGINEER'S DESIGN #1 MtuGan .NG FIGURE E2 LEG,' ID FACE/BACK OF CURB AND GUTTER TO BE REMOVED EXISTING OR PROPOSED FACE! BACK OF CURB AND GUTTER EXISTING DRIVEWAY RAMP EXISTING OR PROPOSED HANDICAP RAMP PARKING STALL TEES NEW TREES AND PLANTERS N. SANTA CRUZ AVE. GRAYS LANE ENGINEER'S DESIGN #2 FIGURE 23 Mr. Scott D. Alman, Jan"—y 26, 2000, Pg. 43 RECOMMENDATIONS Based on the findings and conclusions from the study of traffic operations in downtown Los Gatos, the Town Traffic Engineer has the following recommendations: ▪ To reduce cut -through traffic in downtown streets, implement ramp metering at the N. Santa Cruz Avenue on -ramp to State Route 17 at a metering rate of 250 vehicles per hour. The ramp metering option is an appropriate solution that would induce enough delay to reroute a significant amount of traffic without causing severe disruption to freeway access for residents and employees in the Town of Los Gatos. ▪ Coordinate the traffic signals at the intersections of State Route 9 with N. Santa Cruz Avenue and University Avenue in order to reduce travel time and make this a more attractive route to State Route 17. ▪ Retain the all -way stop control at the intersection of College Avenue and Main Street until such time as funds become available for the design and construction of a pedestrian signal at that location. The pedestrian signal would be the best solution at this location since it will enhance pedestrian safety without causing undue delay to through vehicles on Main Street. ▪ Implement the engineer's design for the Town Plaza Street Improvements. ▪ Implement the engineer's design #1 for the N. Santa Cruz Avenue/Bachman Avenue Intersection Improvements with minor modifications as illustrated in Figure 19. ▪ Implement the engineer's design #2 for the Grays Lane Improvements. The supporting technical documentation for the data and analysis presented in this study is provided under separate cover. If you have any questions or comments regarding this study, please do not hesitate to contact me at 925.463.0611. Town Council Minutes February 7, 2000 • Redevelopment Agency Los Gatos, California LOS GATOS DOWNTOWN TRAFFIC OPERATIONS/GARY KRUGER/TJKM (21.40) Town Traffic Engineer, Gary Kruger with TJKM Transportation Consultants made a detailed presentation to Council concerning traffic in the downtown and the existing street alignment problems. Motion by Mr. Attaway, seconded by Mr. Pirzynski, A) that Council implement ramp metering to 250 vehicles per hour at the Highway 17 and State Route 9 , and enter into negotiations with TJKM to move this action through CalTrans; B) that Council modify traffic signals at Los Gatos -Saratoga Road with University Avenue and North Santa Cruz Avenue to make the highway entrance more attractive. Carried unanimously. (Item C concerning all -way stop at East Main and College would remain as is. Item D concerning Town Plaza design will be considered under Item 22 on this agenda..) DOWNTOWN BEAUTIFICATION PLAN/DESIGN OPTIONS (22.40) Mayor Blanton announced that this was the time and place so noticed to consider the designs for improvements along Santa Cruz Avenue at Bachman Avenue, Grays Lane and Main Street; and approve the final design concepts for Bachman Avenue (Engineer's Design #1 - Figure 3); Grays Lane (Engineer's Design #1 - Figure 8); West Main Street at Plaza Park (Engineer's Design #1 - Figure 12). Council consensus to continue the Bachman -Santa Cruz alignment consideration to February 22, 2000 for staff to return with a more thorough landscaping plan for this corner. There will be no pork chops, and the effects of the bulbs will be considered. Council consensus to approve Gray's Lane - Engineer's Design #1. A one way street in the westerly direction, removing two parking spots, having parking on the right, and traffic on the left moving in a westerly direction. Motion by Mr. Attaway, seconded by Mr. Hutchins, to approve landscape architect's design - Figure # 2 - with as much expansion of the park and narrowing of crosswalks as possible, and to have traffic striping which allows one car at a time to exit the street in front of the post office. Carried by a vote of 4 ayes. Mr. Blanton voted no, noting that the Parks Commission should have an opportunity to review the proposals first. Speaker, April Maiten, representing the Parks Commission, requested limiting the buses at the Plaza. If all buses cannot be eliminated, then at least limit the bus lay over to one bus, and sign the bus stop for the buses to turn off their motor while they are stopped. She asked that the Parks Commission be included in the decisions regarding the plans for the Plaza. ADJOURNMENT Motion by Mr. Attaway, seconded by Mrs. Lubeck, to adjourn this evening's meeting at 9:43 p.m. Carried unanimously. TC:C:VVA4020700 ATTEST: Marian V. Cosgrove Town Clerk 5