Item 34 Staff Report Report Regarding Residential Multi-Family Curbside Recycling and Commercial Waste Recycling ProgramsCOUNCIL AGENDA
DATE: 1/16/90
ITEM NO:
TOWN OF LOS GATOS
COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
DATE: January 11, 1990
TO: MAYOR AND TOWN COUNCIL
FROM: DEBORAH ACOSTA, TOWN MANAGER
SUBJECT: REPORT REGARDING RESIDENTIAL MULTI -FAMILY CURBSIDE
RECYCLING AND COMMERCIAL WASTE RECYCLING PROGRAMS
RECOMMENDATION:
That Council direct Staff to continue to work with the West Valley
Rate Review Committee and Green Valley Disposal Company, Inc.
(GVDC) to refine and implement the plans described below for
expansion of the Curbside Recycling Program to serve multi -family
residential units and businesses.
BACKGROUND:
This report is presented in response to Council's request for a
plan to expand the Curbside Recycling Program to serve multi -family
residential units and businesses.
DISCUSSION:
Staff developed the West Valley Curbside Recycling Program in
cooperation with representatives of the other three West Valley
Cities (Saratoga, Monte Sereno, and Campbell) which comprise a
committee commonly referred to as the Rate Review Committee.
(Continued on page 2)
PREPARED BY: Regina A. Falkner, Mana
Community Services Divi
RAF:dr
CSD05:A:\CNCLRPTS\GARB.TC
Reviewed by: Attorney
TOWN COUNCIL ACTION DIRECTED TO:
ACTION OF COUNCIL:
PAGE TWO
MAYOR AND TOWN COUNCIL
INFORMATIONAL REPORT REGARDING RESIDENTIAL MULTI -FAMILY CURBSIDE
RECYCLING AND COMMERCIAL WASTE RECYCLING PROGRAMS
JANUARY 16, 1990
DISCUSSION: (Continued)
Although the request for proposals was written to solicit bids for
a residential Curbside Recycling Program which would serve one to
four unit lots, vendors were also evaluated with regard to their
willingness and ability to expand such a recycling program to
include multi -family households and also develop and implement a
commercial recycling program. Green Valley Disposal Company, the
firm selected to implement the Curbside Recycling Program,
responded positively to expanding the recycling program. The
subsequent Agreement between the Town and GVDC was written to allow
for expansion of the program based on agreement of both parties.
The Recycling Program is planned to be implemented in four phases
as follows:
PHASE I: To market and implement the residential
curbside recycling program.
PHASE II: To implement a multi -family curbside recycling
program.
PHASE III: To implement, if feasible, a yard waste
collection program.
PHASE IV: To address the recycling needs of the
commercial sector.
It is estimated that a new phase can be tested approximately every
six months.
Currently in Phase I of the Program, the Rate Review Committee has
been monitoring and guiding GVDC with the development and
implementation of the Curbside Recycling Program. Emphasis has
been placed on cooperative marketing of the Program. The Committee
has also been working with GVDC to develop a Household Hazardous
Waste Collection Day - for which funds were allocated by each of
the four West Valley Cities. As a result of attention to these
priorities, the Rate Review Committee has not, yet, concluded the
discussions regarding the expansion of the Recycling Program.
As with the Curbside Recycling Program, economies of scale can be
reached by including all the West Valley Cities in the expansion
of the programs. Therefore, it is recommended that Staff continue
to work with the Rate Review Committee and GVDC to expand the
Program with Council's concurrence.
PAGE THREE
MAYOR AND TOWN COUNCIL
INFORMATIONAL REPORT REGARDING RESIDENTIAL MULTI -FAMILY CURBSIDE
RECYCLING AND COMMERCIAL WASTE RECYCLING PROGRAMS
JANUARY 16, 1990
I.
RESIDENTIAL MULTI -FAMILY CURBSIDE RECYCLING
A. WHAT OTHER CITIES ARE DOING
In order to develop a multi -family recycling program for
the Town, Staff reviewed recycling programs currently in
operation in other cities in the County. The following
is a brief summary of four programs (a narrative summary
is attached as Exhibit 1):
CITY VOLUNTARY OR CONDOS/TOWN
MANDATORY HOUSES
Mtn. Voluntary
View
Palo Voluntary
Alto Voluntary
San Voluntary
Jose
Sun- Voluntary
ny-
vale
Most com-
plexes are
eligible.
Yes, upon
request.
Yes, upon
request.
No.
APTS.
If 15 or fewer
units or cus-
tomer brings
materials to
curb.
Yes, upon
request.
No.
Pilot project
serving five
complexes, only.
CONTAINERS COLLECTION
FOR SITE
CUSTOMER
*2 Burlap
sacks.oil
jugs on
request.
*Burlap
sack.
*3 Stack -
able bins.
None.
Curb or
dumpster.
Sacks set
at curb or
dumpster.
Bins at
curbside.
Cart at
dumpster
site.
*The same collection containers are used in the multi -family as in
the "single-family" residential recycling programs.
Sunnyvale, in their pilot project to a selected sample of multi-
family residents, provides special containers for collection of
materials at the property's collection site, but is currently not
providing any containers to the customers. In some instances,
owners or tenants of units/complexes have purchased cans or carts
(similar to the Toters) to collect materials at or near the
dumpster site.
All of the programs are VOLUNTARY. Pick-up of the materials is
manual; Sunnyvale may be adopting a semi -automated pick-up system.
PAGE FOUR
MAYOR AND TOWN COUNCIL
INFORMATIONAL REPORT REGARDING RESIDENTIAL MULTI -FAMILY CURBSIDE
RECYCLING AND COMMERCIAL WASTE RECYCLING PROGRAMS
JANUARY 16, 1990
B. DEVELOPING A PILOT MULTI -FAMILY RECYCLING PROGRAM
Due to the industries general lack of experience with
this kind of program, Staff recommends that service to
multi -family units be initially provided on a pilot basis
within the Town. This will allow us to test and evaluate
the program. It should then be determined if the program
should be revised and continued or discontinued. Imple-
mentation of a pilot project also has the benefit of
introducing the program to the community to raise aware-
ness of the program and hopefully increase interest.
Jurisdictions who have had the most success within their
programs operate a pilot program before implementing a
larger program. Listed below are key elements of a pilot
project which needs to be considered in implementing the
program in the Town.
1. Need
There are, according to 1980 census data, 10,971
residential units in the Town of Los Gatos.
According to Green Valley, 7,614 of these receive
can service. The multi -family recycling Program
would be designed, therefore, to eventually meet the
needs of households residing in the balance of the
3,357 units. Campbell estimates that the number of
multi -family units is slightly higher and Saratoga
estimates that the number is somewhat lower. There
are no multi -family units in Monte Sereno.
At the request of the Town, GVDC will be serving all
customers receiving can service regardless of the
number of units at their residence. Although the
proposal was to serve households residing in single-
family residences up to four-plexes (inclusive), the
service can easily be provided as it does not
involve purchase of different vehicles or equipment
that was designed for the Phase I Program. Service
only becomes complicated when customers have
dumpsters rather than cans or are unable to leave
materials at the curb because of collection
considerations.
2. Voluntary or Mandatory Participation
All the cities polled have voluntary participation.
PAGE FIVE
MAYOR AND TOWN COUNCIL
INFORMATIONAL REPORT REGARDING RESIDENTIAL MULTI -FAMILY CURBSIDE
RECYCLING AND COMMERCIAL WASTE RECYCLING PROGRAMS
JANUARY 16, 1990
3. Type of Collection Containers For Customers
Customers should be provided with some kind of a
container for collecting the recyclable material.
Bins are generally used only for multi -family
programs where the units are owner occupied. This
is because of the concern of the assumed greater
loss of containers in apartments due to a more
frequent turnover. Also, there is often less space
for bins in apartment units.
Staff will recommend to the Rate Review Committee
that the pilot program supply the less expensive
burlap bags in some test areas and bins in others.
However, prior to making a final recommendation on
the type of containers, the Rate Review Committee
will need to evaluate the results of the pilot
project in light of the costs of the containers
provided and participation rates. Experience of
other cities will also be reviewed.
4. Containers at Collection Site and Collection Site
There are basically four alternatives for containers
which can be left at the collection site; they are
as follows: the containers provided to the
customers (bags or the bins) , cans or carts (similar
to the Toters being used by GVDC), bins of various
sizes, or dumpsters. The system selected must be
arranged with the apartment manager or apartment
complex owner; it will be dependent upon the size
of the complex and the space available for the
containers. All of the four systems can be used.
For the purpose of the pilot project, it is
recommended that the first three alternatives be
used depending on the particular circumstances of
the complex.
The site for pick-up of the materials must also be
considered. In areas where there are only a few
households participating, materials could be left
at the curb or at the site that refuse is collected.
In complexes where there are a larger number of
participants, space must be found somewhere on the
property. The challenge is to not displace land-
scaping or parking areas.
PAGE SIX
MAYOR AND TOWN COUNCIL
INFORMATIONAL REPORT REGARDING RESIDENTIAL MULTI -FAMILY CURBSIDE
RECYCLING AND COMMERCIAL WASTE RECYCLING PROGRAMS
JANUARY 16, 1990
5. Cost of Service
All cities surveyed said that the costs of the
program were included in the cost of the "single
family" curbside recycling program and could not
identify the cost for the program. These cities
also roll the cost of the curbside recycling program
into their refuse collection bill and pay for the
program with revenues collected.
There would be some costs for a pilot project. The
level of costs and revenue source has not, yet, been
identified.
6. Automation
None of the cities currently provide automated
service. Sunnyvale is considering this as an option
due to the large number of multi -family units which
are served. Automation allows for long -run cost
savings as it is labor reducing and also reduces the
number of worker's compensation claims.
C. SUMMARY OF STAFF RECOMMENDATION REGARDING THE MULTI-
FAMILY RESIDENTIAL RECYCLING PROGRAM
Staff recommends that we be directed to continue to work
with the West Valley Rate Review Committee and GVDC to
further develop and implement a pilot program to serve
the recycling needs of the multi -family residential
complexes within the Town. The program would provide
bins or bags to each participating household. Materials
will be collected at a site agreed upon by GVDC and the
apartment manager or owner or at the curb. Carts or bins
would be made available for collection of materials. The
cost of the pilot project needs to be determined as does
the revenue source. The program would be automated if
participation rates in a full-scale program warrant them.
II. RECYCLING SERVICES FOR BUSINESSES
Phase IV of the West Valley Recycling Program is planned to
address the recycling needs of businesses and will be
implemented after Phases I and II are underway. Phase III is
expected to start in about one year.
PAGE SEVEN
MAYOR AND TOWN COUNCIL
INFORMATIONAL REPORT REGARDING RESIDENTIAL MULTI -FAMILY CURBSIDE
RECYCLING AND COMMERCIAL WASTE RECYCLING PROGRAMS
JANUARY 16, 1990
Research by Staff into commercial recycling programs is not
complete at this time. A preliminary survey is attached as
Exhibit 2. Generally, it appears that businesses who receive
recycling services are large and contract directly with an
agency to have materials collected. Cities which do operate
programs for medium and small businesses generally collect
cardboard and glass as they are the items most common to
businesses. The number of businesses in the Town that
contract with outside agencies is not known.
A full report regarding recycling services for businesses will
be presented to Council in January of 1991. In the interim,
a letter has been sent to the Chamber of Commerce requesting
that they use the avenues available to them to encourage Los
Gatos businesses to recycle their refuse materials. Staff is
currently reviewing an ordinance recently adopted by the City
of Palo Alto which requires stores to offer customers the
option of receiving their purchases in paper bags. Support
must first be solicited from the Chamber and affected
businesses.
CONCLUSION:
Program phases are based on priority and resources to complete each
of the phases. Staff will report to Council approximately every
six months regarding the implementation of the next phase of the
West Valley Recycling Program.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Fiscal impact on the Town for implementation of the comprehensive
recycling program is currently limited to in -kind Staff costs.
Town Staff is needed to assist in developing, implementing,
monitoring, and evaluating the programs. Furthermore, Staff must
be made available for information and referral and handling of
complaints. No funds have been budgeted in the current fiscal year
operating budget for this increased service level. The cost and
revenue source for the pilot multi -family recycling program has
not, yet, been determined. Prior to implementing the pilot
project, Staff will return to Council with a report fully
describing the program -- including costs and revenue sources.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Summary of Local Multi -Family Recycling Programs
2. Summary of Information Regarding Commercial Recycling
PAGE EIGHT
MAYOR AND TOWN COUNCIL
INFORMATIONAL REPORT REGARDING RESIDENTIAL MULTI -FAMILY CURBSIDE
RECYCLING AND COMMERCIAL WASTE RECYCLING PROGRAMS
JANUARY 16, 1990
DISTRIBUTION:
1. Sue Marki, Div. of Recycling, 1025 "P" St., Sacramento 95814
2. David Wolf, First United Methodist Church of Los Gatos,
19 High School Court, Los Gatos 95032
3. Nancy Cardinet, 221 Jones Road, Los Gatos 95032
4. Claudette Lynch, 108 Cherrystone Court, Los Gatos 95032
5. Mrs. Campbell, 17020 Los Cerritos Drive, Los Gatos 95032
6. Mrs. Williams, First United Methodist Church of Los Gatos,
19 High School Court, Los Gatos 95032
7. Dr. Irving Olender, 178 Long Meadow Drive, Los Gatos 95030
8. Ms. Linger, 312 Harding, Los Gatos 95032
9. Ms. Delores Simone, 248 Old Adobe Road, Los Gatos 95030
10. Mr. John Snelham, 247 Old Adobe Road, Los Gatos 95030
11. Mr. Gerard Wen, GVDC, P.O. Box 1227, Los Gatos 95031
12. Barbara Lee, City of Campbell
13. Todd Argow, City of Saratoga
14. Rosemary Pierce, City of Monte Sereno
15. Marilyn Basham, 108 Teresita Way, Los Gatos 95032
16. Ms. Sara Stephenson, League of Women Voters, Los Gatos,
Saratoga Monte Sereno, 12491 Jolene Court, Saratoga 95070
17. Ms. Cynthia Dettner, LGS, 770 "L" Street, Suite 960,
Sacramento 95814
18. Dick Gaines, 340 Johnson Avenue, Los Gatos 95032
19. Mrs. Albert Blake, 17511 Pine Street, Los Gatos 95032
20. Janet Foreman, City of Palo Alto, Public Works Dept., P.O. Box
10250, Palo Alto, CA 94303
21. Mark Bowers, City of Mountain View, Solid Waste Program
Manager, P.O. Box 7540, Mountain View, CA 94039
EXHIBIT 1
SUMMARY OF LOCAL MULTI -FAMILY RECYCLING PROGRAMS
SAN JOSE
The City of San Jose provides recycling services to all single
family residential units and all units where there are four
or fewer units providing that they also have "can" service.
Townhouses and condominiums are also served through their
recycling program. As of April of 1989, Waste Management,
Inc., the firm with which San Jose contracts, also agreed to
serve townhouses and condominium units which have dumpsters.
San Jose provides bins to residents at such complexes upon
request. Apartments have not been incorporated into the
program, although San Jose hopes to have a pilot program in
place in the future. Due to the higher turnover of residents
at apartments, it is believed that there will be a higher risk
of losing the containers. According to contact person Vera
Dahle, Recycling Specialist (277-5533), public education is
also crucial to the success of a program. Where the resident
turnover is high, ongoing education is necessary. This
requires funds and/or an organized volunteer pool, neither of
which San Jose has dedicated to meeting this objective at this
time.
Any pilot project developed by San Jose would probably use
bags rather than the stacking plastic container for two
reasons: 1.) an assumed high loss rate; and, 2.) realization
that apartments generally have less space than other units.
SUNNYVALE
The City of Sunnyvale is currently operating a pilot project
at five large apartment complexes in the city. Although they
use burlap bags for their single-family curbside recycling
program, they currently do not provide any containers to the
participants. They do provide carts which are left at the
refuse collection site. The Sunnyvale Staff is recommending
that the Council accept a bid from GVDC which would include
distribution of two stackable bins to each household and would
provide for carts at each apartment complex. This would allow
for the program to change from a manual to a semi -automated
pick-up system.
Valerie Lenz, Solid Waste Program Coordinator for Sunnyvale
(730-7262), stated that responses to the pilot project have
been positive; participation rates have been high and requests
for participation have also been great.
MOUNTAIN VIEW
According to Mark Bowers, Solid Waste Program Manager, (415)
966-6301, the City of Mountain View provides recycling
services to all residential complexes of one to four units.
They also provide services to all complexes containing fifteen
or fewer units and are providing services to most condominium
units. Services are not provided at complexes where access
is not possible. However, anyone who is willing to bring
their recyclable items to the curb may participate and will
be provided two burlap bags and oil jugs upon request. The
cost of the printed bags is approximately $0.50.
PALO ALTO
The City of Palo Alto provides services to residents of multi-
family on a request for service basis. They are provided bags
to collect the material and are then asked to leave them in
a designated space near the dumpster or at the curb. As with
other programs, the apartment owner must be agreeable to
providing space for the deposit of the sacks at the dumpster
site, unless the sacks are left at the curb. Landlords at
some sites in Palo Alto have provided 30-gallon cans for the
residents to transfer their recyclables to, rather than
leaving sacks at the dumpster site. Participation rates for
single-family units has been estimated at about 70 percent;
rates for multi -family have been estimated at 20 to 30
percent. To increase participation, the city contacted owners
of about 25 apartment complexes to solicit participation; only
five responded. The benefits stated to managers is that it
is an increased service to the tenants and could potentially
decrease waste disposal costs. The contact person for Palo
Alto is Janet Foreman, (415) 329-2495.
-2-
CSD05:A:\cnclrpts\garb.tc
EXHIBIT 2
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION REGARDING COMMERCIAL RECYCLING
SANTA CLARA COUNTY MANUFACTURING GROUP
The Solid Waste Task Force is in the process of preparing a guide
directed primarily at industrial businesses to assist them in
designing and implementing recycling programs. The guide is
expected to be completed mid -April, just before Earth Day, 1990.
It will contain a variety of information, including worksheets so
businesses can perform waste audits and lists of firms which will
provide tours. Brian Rector, an employee of INTEL, is the Chair
of the Santa Clara County Manufacturing Groups Task Force (765-
2666) .
CITY OF SANTA CLARA
The Staff will be proposing that the Council adopt an ordinance to
require businesses to report what steps they are taking to recycle;
this is important in order to be able to track refuse diverted from
landfill. They hope that introduction of recycling in this manner
will allow the City to develop agreement within the commercial/
industrial community that recycling is needed and build consensus
with regard to that approach.
There is concern that some of the firms who pick up glass from
businesses will no longer do so because they currently get more
glass than they need. The glass bins that they pick up from the
bars and restaurants is also so dirty that they often have to sort
it when it gets to their transfer site.
Santa Clara will be focusing on recycling cardboard and glass.
The contact person is Rick Mauck, 988-3151.
CITY OF SUNNYVALE
In 1976, they had a private study done to determine what they
should do next as their curbside recycling program was already in
place. The study said they should serve medium-sized businesses;
large businesses would broker with a firm on their own and small
businesses wouldn't have enough refuse to make recycling
economically feasible.
The City recently went out to bid on their refuse collection
services. They asked that vendors include a plan to serve
businesses. A proposal has not, yet, been accepted by Council.
The Solid Waste Management Coordinator for the City is Valerie Lenz
(730-7262).
CIRCO GLASS
According to John Henebury of CIRCO GLASS (415) 791-6980, the firm
will pay $10/ton of glass collected. They have different size bins
which generally generate 10, 15 or 20 dollars when full.
Businesses can combine aluminum, P.E.T. plastic soda bottles and
glass for a fee of $40/ton, this is a break-even option.
CITY OF SAN JOSE
According to Michelle King, Commercial Recycling Assistant, San
Jose Conservation Corp picks up newspaper, aluminum, glass and
cardboard from commercial businesses.
Partially, in response to AB 939, the City started a pilot project.
They provided 200 bins for collection of cardboard. CIRCO has
distributed the bins to 200 businesses. City staff is monitoring
the volume generated.
A second pilot program with 200 businesses will start by the end
of February; mixed recyclables will be collected.
Staff also provides information and referral. According to Ann
Schneider, Environmental Specialist with the City of San Jose, bins
for the pilot projects are paid for through the City's Solid Waste
Franchise Agreement. CIRCO is providing the collection services
in exchange for the revenues from the sale of materials collected.
It is not known, at this time, whether this arrangement will
continue under a permanent on -going program.
CITY OF PALO ALTO
The City of Palo Alto offers free collection of white paper.
Collection is provided on a request basis from schools and
businesses. Participants must provide their own metal containers.
A minimum of two 30-gallon cans must be available for pickup. The
City has about 106 participants. The cost is included in the
recycling program.
Cardboard is also picked up from about 16 businesses who rent bins
from PASCO. Collection services are free. The City will be
expanding their programs; they will be distributing 20 bins
purchased by the program throughout the City. Collection of
cardboard is free of charge to the businesses.
NOTE: Interviews were conducted during the months of December
1989 and January 1990.
-2-
CSDO5:A:\cnclrpts\garb.tc
January 16, 1990
Los Gatos, California
Motion by Mr. Carlson, seconded by Mr. Ventura, that Council: establish March 1, 1991 as the
last day to submit complete plans and calculation for seismic upgrades; establish May 1, 1993
as the last day to complete all work related to seismic upgrades or make findings and establish
SEISMIC SAFETY CONTINUED
time frames as appropriate; authorize that at the discretion of the Director of Building Services,
occupancy may be revoked for failure to comply; determines there is no need for a public
hearing prior to introducing the ordinance. Carried unanimously.
Motion by Mr. Carlson, seconded by Mr. Ventura, to waive the reading of the draft ordinance.
Carried unanimously. Town Clerk read the Title.
Motion by Mr. Carlson, seconded by Mr. Ventura, that Council introduce Ordinance entitled,
ORDINANCE OF THE TOWN OF LOS GATOS ADDING ARTICLE IX OF CHAPTER 7 OF
THE TOWN CODE ESTABLISHING AN IDENTIFICATION AND MITIGATION PROGRAM
FOR POTENTIALLY HAZARDOUS BUILDINGS BY ADOPTING THE 198,5 EDITION OF
THE UNIFORM CODE FOR BUILDING CONSERVATION AS PUBLISHED BY THE
INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF BUILDING OFFICIALS AND MAKING CERTAIN
AMENDMENTS THERETO. Carried unanimously.
Motion by Mr. Carlson, seconded by Mr. Ventura, that Council adopt Resolution 1990-21
entitled, RESOLUTION OF THE TOWN OF LOS GATOS ESTABLISHING PROCEDURES
FOR INVESTIGATION OF UNREINFORCED MASONRY BEARING WALL BUILDINGS.
Carried unanimously.
SOLID WASTE COLLECTION/CURBSIDE RECYCLING/RESIDENTIAL
Motion by Mr. Carlson, seconded by Mr. Ventura, that the cost of providing curbside recycling
services be $0.82 per household for the first year (12 months) of recycling and review at the end
of that time the Proposal for Organic Collection.
3 9SOLID WASTE COLLECTION/CURBSIDE RECYCLING/MULTI-FAMILY
Motion by Mr. Ventura, seconded by Mr. Carlson, that Staff continue to work with the West
Valley Rate Review Committee and Green Valley Disposal Company, Inc. (GVDC) to refine
and implement the following plans for expansion of the Curbside Recycling Program to serve
multi -family residential units and businesses:
Phase I To market and implement the residential curbside recycling program.
Phase II To implement a multi -family curbside recycling program within six
months of the implementation of phase I.
Phase III To implement a yard waste collection program.
Phase IV To address the recycling needs of the commercial sector.
Carried unanimously.
RECORDS RETENTION SCHEDULE/RESOLUTION 1990-22
Motion by MR Carlson, seconded by Mrs. Benjamin, that the Los Gatos Town Council adopt
Resolution 1990-22 entitled, RESOLUTION OF THE TOWN OF LOS GATOS ADOPTING A
TOWN -WIDE RECORDS RETENTION SCHEDULE AND A POLICY FOR ONGOING
RECORDS MANAGEMENT, Carried unanimously.
TC:DI:MM011690
9