Loading...
Item 16 Staff Report Adopt Resolution Approving Revised Housing Conservation Program Guidelines, Including a New Safety Grant ComponentCOUNCIL AGENDA REPORT DATE: March 28, 1996 TO: MAYOR AND TO COUNC FROM: TOWN MANAGER SUBJECT: MEETING DATE: 04/01/96 ITEM NO. ADOPT RESOLUTION APPROVING REVISED HOUSING CONSERVATION PROGRAM GUIDELINES, INCLUDING A NEW SAFETY GRANT COMPONENT RECOMMENDATION: Adopt resolution approving revised Housing Conservation Program Guidelines, including a new Safety Grant component. BACKGROUND: The Town's housing goal is to provide adequate housing for Town citizens, regardless of age, income, race, or ethnic background. The Town encourages conservation and construction of housing adequate for future populations and replacement needs consistent with environmental limitations and in proper relationship to community facilities, open space and transportation. The Housing Conservation Program (HCP), managed by the Community Services Department for twenty years, contributes to the Town's overall housing goal by providing low interest loans and grants to income eligible property owners for home rehabilitation purposes. In this manner, the Town preserves existing housing stock and promotes safe housing for Town residents. The Town's Housing Conservation Program is funded entirely by federal Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) monies and currently includes the following components: Owner Occupied Housing Rehabilitation Loans Rental Housing Rehabilitation Loans Emergency Loans Rehabilitation Grants (Emergency) On January 6, 1996, the Council was presented with an informational report regarding the status of Town housing programs. Included in that report was a discussion regarding the amendment of the HCP Guidelines to include a new Safety Grant component. Generally, the Safety Grant Program is intended to: • Save lives and property; • Save tax dollars through proactive efforts; • Augment existing housing rehabilitation programs and provide an alternative to full service loans; • Facilitate the marketing of housing conservation programs; and • Allow the Town to more effectively use Housing Rehabilitation allocated funds. PREPARED BY: .�I Reviewed by: A -y ance Revised: 3/28/96 11:44 am na A. Falkner Services Director Reformatted: 10/23/95 . PAGE 2 MAYOR AND TOWN COUNCIL SUBJECT: ADOPT RESOLUTION APPROVING REVISED HOUSING CONSERVATION PROGRAM GUIDELINES, INCLUDING A NEW SAFETY GRANT COMPONENT March 28, 1996 DISCUSSION: The following revisions have been made to the HCP Guidelines: 1. Safety Grant Program: A Safety Grant component was added to allow the Town to meet those objectives identified above. The Program will also allow clients to correct the more serious health and safety deficiencies on their properties without having to commit to paying off or carrying loans secured by deeds of trust. Based on service requests and an informal survey, it is also anticipated that the Program will meet a specific community need by addressing earthquake retrofitting, security improvements, improved accessibility for elderly and disabled residents, and other fire related safety improvements. Eligibility criteria relating to the Safety Grant Program are defined below: GRANTS SAFETY: Owner -Occupied SAFETY: Rental Housing Income Eligibility Annual household income cannot exceed 80% of County Median Income (CMI). Annual household income of tenant cannot exceed 80% of CMI. For a five year period following completion of rehab work, annual household income of tenant(s) occupying rehabilitated rental unit(s) cannot exceed 80% of CMI. Eligible Housing Program applicable to structures with 1 to 10 rental units only. Maximum Grant Amount Up to $10,000 Up to $3,000 per unit within any five year period. Conditions • * Owner approval required. * For a five year period following completion of rehab work, rent on rehabilitated units is restricted to 30% of the household's annual gross income. Eligible Work Limited to that which: * Allows a structure to meet minimum health and safety requirements. * Provides minimum (non -engineered) earthquake retrofitting. * Helps prevent residential fires through fire prevention mechanisms. * Provides security improvements. * Improves accessibility for elderly and disabled residents. Limited to that which: * Helps prevent residential fires through fire prevention mechanisms. * Provides security improvements. * Improves accessibility for elderly and disabled residents. fl n n fl • PAGE 3 MAYOR AND TOWN COUNCIL SUBJECT: ADOPT RESOLUTION APPROVING REVISED HOUSING CONSERVATION PROGRAM GUIDELINES, INCLUDING A NEW SAFETY GRANT COMPONENT March 28, 1996 2. General Guideline Revisions: The HCP Guidelines were last revised in 1989. The Safety Grant concept provided an opportunity for the Loan Review Committee to revise the guidelines for purposes of clarification and in light of changing conditions. The following table outlines the most significant changes made to the guidelines. It should be noted that the Community Services Department maintains an HCP Procedures Manual in which specific functions and processes are outlined. I. Purpose A description of the Housing Conservation Program's contributions to the Town's overall housing objectives was added, in addition to a comment about the program's federal CDBG funding source. I1. General Eligibility Criteria • This section was reduced to four components: Income Eligibility, Eligible Structures, Hazard Insurance, and the Application Process. • Eligibility criteria applicable only to the loan process was moved to Section III. • The Town's nondiscrimination clause was added. I I. Loan and Grant Programs • Text was reformatted into tables so guidelines can be reviewed at -a -glance. • The maximum loan amount provided to eligible "owner - occupied" applicants was raised from $35,000 to $50,000 to keep pace with increased housing rehab costs and better accommodate the requirement that rehab loans, when combined with other resources, be sufficient to eliminate substandard conditions throughout the housing unit. • The dollar amount cited in the stipulation that loans of $25,000 or more receive (prior to loan approval) an in-depth secondary review has also been increased to $35,000. • Eligible work for rehab loans was clearly outlined. • The Safety Grant component was added. IV. Program Responsibilities The responsibilities of the Town's Finance Department in tracking HCP loan transactions through the Town's accounts receivables system were added. V. Appeal Procedures The responsibilities of the Town in affording an applicant the opportunity to appeal a denial for loan or grant funding by the Loan Review Committee were added. Note: Section IV of the existing guidelines (titled "General Guidelines") outlined special terms and conditions. The revised HCP Guidelines do not include this section. The Owner Participation Agreement, executed by the Owner and Town following loan approval, outlines all special and applicable HCP loan terms and conditions, which do not need to be detailed in the guidelines. • PAGE 4 MAYOR AND TOWN COUNCIL SUBJECT: ADOPT RESOLUTION APPROVING REVISED HOUSING CONSERVATION PROGRAM GUIDELINES, INCLUDING A NEW SAFETY GRANT COMPONENT March 28, 1996 3. Minor Guideline Revisions: Other nonsubstantial format, grammatical, and language changes were made to make the guidelines more useful. CONCLUSION: Staff has chaired a committee to expand Urban County housing rehab programs to include a similar Safety Grant Program. Advantages to this approach include group marketing and promotional efforts and streamlined bidding processes (where an annual contract could be established with one contractor to perform safety repair work throughout the County). The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) recently reviewed the County's proposed Safety Grant Program. A letter from HUD to the County dated February 27, 1996, (Attachment 2) commends the County for implementing plans to "further secure the quality of housing for low and moderate income households" and encourages participating municipalities to update their rehab programs to include a Safety Grant component. The Loan Review Committee met to consider the revised HCP Guidelines and recommends adoption by the Town Council. The Town's Community Services Commission met to consider the Safety Grant Program and also recommends adoption. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENTS: This is not a project defined under CEQA, and no further action is required. FISCAL IMPACT: The HCP is funded completely with federal CDBG monies received through the annual CDBG allocation process. The Town's General Fund is not impacted by HCP loan and grant activity and cannot benefit from savings in the Housing Conservation Program. CDBG funds provide dollars for loans/grants. These dollars and loan payments paid by HCP clients are deposited into a revolving loan fund at Bank of the West for expenditure. CDBG dollars reimburse the Town for all HCP associated Staff costs including technical assistance and loan processing. The County charges our CDBG grant allocation $15,000 for technical services relating to work write-ups and rehabilitation monitoring. Housing Rehab Project Support: 8030-45050 - $45,000 Housing Rehab Loans/Grants 218-45040 County Rehab Specialist: $15,000 (Funds are granted to the Town and transferred back to the County in payment of services rendered.) RAF:bcb:tl CSD24:A:\hcp\Safety.Fin Attachments: 1. Resolution Exhibit A: Town of Los Gatos Housing Conservation Program Guidelines 2. Letter to County of Santa Clara (Housing and Community Development Program) from HUD re: Safety Grant Program Distribution: Charlie Chew, Santa Clara County, Housing and Community Development Program 1735 N. First Street, San Jose, CA 95112 Community Services Commission ATTACHMENT 1 RESOLUTION RESOLUTION OF THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF LOS GATOS ADOPTING HOUSING CONSERVATION PROGRAM GUIDELINES AND RESCINDING RESOLUTION 1989-223 WHEREAS, the Town of Los Gatos has a Housing Conservation Program allowing it to provide Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funded low interest loans and grants to income eligible property owners for home rehabilitation purposes; and WHEREAS, the Town of Los Gatos desires to revise the guidelines which govern the Housing Conservation Program; and NOW, THEREFORE, THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF LOS GATOS DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: (1) adopt the Housing Conservation Program Guidelines attached as Exhibit A; and (2) rescind Resolution 1989-223. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: This decision constitutes a final administrative decision pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 1094.6 as adopted by section 1.10.085 of the Town Code of the Town of Los Gatos. Any application for judicial relief from this decision must be sought within the time limits and pursuant to the procedures established by Code of Civil Procedure section 1094.6, or such shorter time as required by state or federal law. CSD08:A:\RESOS\040196.R02 i PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Town Council of the Town of Los Gatos, California, held on the 1st day of April, 1996 by the following vote: COUNCIL MEMBERS: AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: SIGNED: ATTEST: MAYOR OF THE TOWN OF LOS GATOS LOS GATOS, CALIFORNIA CLERK OF THE TOWN OF LOS GATOS LOS GATOS, CALIFORNIA CSD08:A:\RESOS\040196.R02 2 U.S. Departm. Pacific/Hawaii C 450 Golden Gate Avenue San Francisco, California 94102-3448 ATTACHMENT 2 E. 27 f'� 0 MAR 0 1 1996 f Ho••-ing and Urban Developme ,HCHMEN i 2 0 Bob Rathbun Housing Rehabilitation Specialist COUNTYOF SANTACLA.RA County of Santa Clara HCD Department and Community Development Program 1735 North First Street, Suite 265 San Jose, California 95112 Dear Mr. Rathbun: SUBJECT: Housing Rehabilitation Program Safety Grant Program You have requested a review of the County's proposed Safety Grant Program (draft) which was received on February 15, 1996. In particular, you have requested whether "units affected by the program would be eligible to be credited as rehabilitation units in the Consolidated Plan." As explained in the draft, the program would be an expansion of the existing Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Housing Rehabilitation Program within the County, and it's participating municipalities. The program would specifically address health and safety requirements, perform minimum earthquake retrofitting, install fire prevention mechanisms, and security devices, and improve accessibility for the disabled The program is designed to provide an alternative to full service loans ranging from $30,000 - $50,000 (for substantial improvements). Homeowners would be able to qualify for grants estimated at $2,000 to $10,000, and renters would be served at an estimated cost of $500 to $2,000 per unit. The CDBG municipalities would set grant limits, and establish the types of improvements needed. The program would be administered, and implemented by existing CDBG Urban County staff. As indicated, all participants would be required to meet income guidelines established by the CDBG program. With regards to reporting the potential housing units, in the Consolidated Plan, a grantee should maintain sufficient documentation of all assistance provided during the reporting period for all households assisted. Rehabilitation activities that do not result in a housing unit being brought up to standard condition (e.g. emergency 2 rehab or weatherization programs, to name a few), activities undertaken without Federal funds or activities assisting homeless and non -homeless persons with special needs not linked to the provision of supportive, transitional or permanent housing, may be reported separately, but shall not be reported as persons assisted with housing. Regardless of the funding differences for rehabilitation (loan amounts compared to grant amounts), the completed units should be reported as assisted units. In further reviewing the draft proposal, it appears that the program is countywide as well as local. The County is encouraged to include the participating municipalities' in the administration, and implementation of their own Housing Rehabilitation Programs so as to reduce administrative duplication etc. Upon finalizing the proposed plan, both the County, and municipalities should update their Housing Rehabilitation Program policies to include the Safety Grant Program. In addition, the information should be made available to the public through the Consolidated Plan process. The County is to be commended for addressing its housing needs, and implementing plans to further secure the quality of housing for low and moderate income households. If you have any questions regarding this matter, you may contact Lydia Beltran, Community Planning and Development Representative at (415) 436-6489, ex 2632. Very sincerely yours, Ro ert G. IL Program Management Community Planning and Development Division EXHIBIT A TOWN OF LOS.GATOS HOUSING CONSERVATION PROGRAM GUIDELINES I. PURPOSE The Town's housing goal is to provide adequate housing for Town citizens, regardless of age, income, race or ethnic background. The Town encourages conservation and construction of housing adequate for future populations and replacement needs consistent with environmental limitations and in proper relationship to community facilities, open space and transportation. The Housing Conservation Program (HCP), managed by the Community Services Department since 1976, contributes to the Town's overall housing goal by providing CDBG funded low interest loans and grants to income eligible property owners for home rehabilitation purposes. In this manner,•the Town preserves its existing housing stock and promotes safe housing for Los Gatos residents. Housing conservation is achieved through: 1. Owner Occupied Housing Rehabilitation Loans 2. Rental Housing Rehabilitation Loans 3. Emergency Loans 4. Rehabilitation Grants (Emergency and Safety) The Housing Conservation Program is funded entirely by federal Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) monies. II. GENERAL ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA A. Income Eligibility: The Town's Housing Conservation Program is designed to assist low and very low income residents, i.e., those with annual household incomes not exceeding 80% of the County Median Income (CMI) adjusted for household size as defined by the Federal Department of Housing and Urban Development for the San Jose PMSA. The Town offers 6% rehabilitation loans to qualified applicants with incomes exceeding 80% of the CMI. Very Low Income: Low Income: Moderate Income: Annual household income at or below 50% of CMI. Annual household income greater than 50%, but not exceeding 80%, of CMI. Annual household income greater than 80%, but not exceeding 100%, of CMI. Non-profit organizations providing affordable housing or other housing related services to persons at or below 80% of the CMI are eligible for assistance through the Town's HCP pending analysis of direct benefit to Los Gatos residents. B. Eligible Structures: Single-family detached, single-family attached, multi -family structures, and mobile homes. Structure must be located within the Town's boundary limits, except as otherwise approved by the Loan Review Committee in instances where the housing unit, located elsewhere in Santa Clara County, serves a housing need benefiting a segment of the Los Gatos population. Structure to be rehabilitated must also be of legal status. C. Hazard Insurance: Prior to disbursement of funds, applicant must provide proof of adequate hazard insurance on the structure, which must be maintained for the life of the loan. The amount of coverage must equal the full replacement cost of the insured structure, and the Town of Los -i- /Th Gatos must be named in the policy as a lenders loss payee. Hazard insurance coverage will be monitored by the Town. D. Applications: A Town application must be completed to initiate the process for a rehabilitation loan and grant. Applicants may apply for more than one loan or grant program. In administering the Housing Conservation Program, the Town does not discriminate on the basis of age, sex, color, race, marital status, sexual orientation, ancestry, physical or mental disability, national origin, religion, medical condition, or any other basis prohibited by law. III. LOAN AND GRANT PROGRAMS The cost of rehabilitation materials, labor, permits, credit report, lot book, termite report, loan processing fee, architectural fees, engineering fees, business license fee, and completion of rehabilitation contract specifications may be included in the principal loan/grant amount. A. LOANS - ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA REHAB LOANS OWNER OCCUPIED RENTAL HOUSING EMERGENCY INCOME ELIGIBILITY See Interest Rate below. Applicant must own property to be rehabilitated. Over the life of the loan, only ten- ants with an annual household income of 80% or less of CMI may occupy rehabilitated units. Annual household income cannot exceed 80% of CMI MAXIMUM LOAN AMOUNT $50,000 (Loans over $35,000 require special approval consist- ing of a secondary review of the Rehab Work Write -Up Inspec- tion List by the Loan Review Committee.) Single -Unit: $15,000 Multi -Units: $25,000 Complex: $100,000 Program applicable to structures with 1 to 10 rental units only. $15,000 INTEREST RATE 0%: Annual household income at or below 50% of CMI (pay- ments may be deferred) 3%: Annual household income between 50%-80% of CMI (pay- ments may be fully or partially deferred) 6%: Annual household income exceeds 80% of CMI From 3% to 6% as determined by Loan Review Committee. Payments may be deferred up to five years upon Loan Review Committee's approval of owner's pro forma outlining improvement costs and expected rental income. 3% LOAN TERM 3 to 20 years depending upon Applicant's financial condition. 15 years 3 to 5 years RESTRICTIONS Over the life of the loan, rent on rehabilitated unit(s) is restricted to 30% of the household's annual gross income. Emergency condition must exist (i.e., threat to life and property). - 2 - LOANS: OTHER CONDITIONS 1. Ability to Repay Applicant must evidence adequate capacity to repay rehabilitation loan(s). 2. Assets Applicant's assets will be considered by the Loan Review Committee during the loan evaluation process. 3. Credit Worthiness Applicant's credit history must be in good standing. A credit report will be obtained by the Town for verification purposes. 4. Elimination of Substandard Conditions The rehabilitation loan, when combined with other resources, must be sufficient to eliminate substandard conditions. 5. Loan to Value Ratio The principal amount of the rehabilitation loan, together with the principal amount of any other debt secured by the property, cannot exceed 90% of the projected post - rehabilitation value of the structure. 6. Documentation HCP loans are evidenced by a Promissory Note, executed by the owner, and secured by a Deed of Trust, satisfactory to the Town. An Owner Participation Agreement outlining HCP loan terms and conditions is also executed by the owner and Town. ELIGIBLE WORK Eligible repairs are recommended to the Loan Review Committee by the County Rehab Specialist. Repairs must eliminate substandard conditions as they exist throughout the housing unit and address one or more of the following: 1. Code Violation Repairs which correct deficiency violations under applicable Building and Housing codes, including incipient violations. ?. Disabled Access Removal of architectural barriers which help provide for the independent functioning of a disabled household member, or modifications which make the housing unit fully accessible to the disabled household member. 3. Earthquake Safety Repairs or modifications which enhance the structural safety of the housing unit during an earthquake. 4. Overcrowding Rehabilitation or alteration of a housing unit which alleviates conditions creating overcrowding, including expansion of the unit to a size adequate to house the occupants (i.e., eligible repair work may provide for increased bedroom and bathroom space through addition or conversion). 5. General Property Improvements General improvements such as landscaping, fence repair, and painting for cosmetic effect, may be financed only if all substandard conditions (i.e., code violations or deficiencies) are corrected. The purpose of the Housing Conservation Program is to provide loan funds to make needed repairs, not to upgrade the property for resale. - 3 - B. GRANTS - ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA GRANTS EMERGENCY SAFETY: Owner Occupied SAFETY: Rental Housing INCOME ELIGIBILITY Annual household income cannot exceed 80% of CMI. Annual household income cannot exceed 80% of CMI. Annual household income of tenant cannot exceed 80% of CMI. For a five year period following completion of rehab work, annual household income of tenant(s) occupying rehabilitated rental unit(s) cannot exceed 80% of CMI. ELIGIBLE HOUSING Only owner occupied housing is eligible. Program applicable to structures with 1 to 10 rental units only. MAXIMUM GRANT AMT $3,000 Up to $10,000 Up to $3,000 per unit within any five year period. CONDITIONS Emergency condition must exist (i.e., threat to life and property). • Owner approval required. • For a five year period following completion of rehab work, rent on rehabilitated units is restricted to 30% of the household's annual gross income. ELIGIBLE WORK Limited to housing code violations. Resources must be sufficient to eliminate emergency substandard condition. Limited to that which: Limited to that which: • Allows a structure to meet minimum health and safety requirements. • Provides minimum (non- engineered) earthquake retrofitting. • Helps prevent residential fires through fire prevention mechanisms • Provides security improvements. • Improves accessibility for elderly and disabled residents. • Helps prevent residential fires through fire prevention mechanisms. • Provides security improvements. • Improves accessibility for elderly and disabled residents. Examples of Eligible Work: Minimum Health/Safety Requirements Concealing exposed wires or junctions, installing stair or porch railings, correcting unsanitary conditions, grounding electrical systems. Earthquake Retrofitting Fastening floor framing (mudsills) to foundations, installing plywood (shear) panels as required to prevent lateral movement at walls during earthquakes, strapping/securing gas fixtures (water heaters or clothes dryers), replacing rigid gas connectors with flexible type to prevent gas leaks during or after earthquakes, etc. Residential Fire Preven- tion Installation of smoke alarms and fire extinguishers, correction of inadequate clearances between gas fixtures and combustibles, removal of hazardous combustibles, the sweeping, inspection, and repair of fireplaces, including installation of spark arrests, etc. Security Improvements Deadbolts on exterior doors, window locks, motion sensor controlled exterior lighting, etc. Elderly/Disabled Resident Assistance Installation of grab bars, wheelchair ramps, accessible door openings, hand-held shower heads, etc. - 4 - IV. PROGRAM RESPONSIBILITIES A. Community Services Department The Community Services Program Coordinator: administers the Housing Conservation Program; conducts program marketing and outreach; conducts initial interviews, processes applications and determines eligibility; conducts preliminary housing surveys; presents applications and projects to the Loan Review Committee; prepares and executes loan and other necessary documents; coordinates rehabilitation projects with the Rehabilitation Specialist; mediates disputes between homeowners and contractors; processes progress and final payments; monitors monthly loan payments, payoffs, foreclosures, and program incomes for loan portfolio; and, prepares quarterly and annual rehab reports for County of Santa Clara's Community and Housing Development Program. B. Loan Review Committee: The Loan Review Committee is appointed by the Town Manager. The Committee interprets and applies Housing Conservation Program guidelines in evaluating and approving loans and grants, establishes terms and conditions for loans and grants, and assures the appropriate use of funds. It also recommends policy and procedural changes and advises the Program Coordinator on housing related issues. C. Town Manager: The Town Manager is authorized to sign various program documents, including owner participation agreements, payment authorization forms, bank agreements, and requests for full reconveyance. An applicant denied a loan or grant by the Loan Review Committee may appeal to the Town Manager, who shall make the final determination as to the applicant's eligibility and appropriate use of housing conservation program funds. Appeal procedures are defined in Section V below. D. Finance Department: The Finance Department performs various loan management functions: it tracks HCP loan transactions through the Town's accounts receivable system, collects and deposits monthly loan payments, approves payment authorization forms, and generates monthly aged invoice reports for loan monitoring purposes. E. Urban County Housing and Community Development Program: The County Rehabilitation Specialist surveys property to determine extent of rehabilitation work; establishes project work scope with Client and Program Coordinator; prepares construction and bid specifications; assists property owner and contractor(s) in negotiating construction contracts; inspects construction work in progress and approves change orders; approves payments to contractor(s) as appropriate; resolves conflicts; conducts progress and final inspections, and; performs tasks relating to project close out. County Staff reviews rehab quarterly and annual reports and monitors program administration. - 5 - (*\ fl V. APPEAL PROCEDURES A. An applicant who believes s/he is aggrieved by a determination of the Loan Review Committee may elect to have his/her application reviewed by the Town Manager. B. If the Loan Review Committee denies or refuses to approve an HCP loan or grant, it shall provide a written explanation of the determination and the basis therefore to the applicant within two weeks following the determination. The written explanation shall also inform the applicant of procedures for obtaining review of the decision. C. The applicant may request a meeting with the Town Manager by submitting a written request to the Town within ten days following receipt of notice of determination by the Loan Review Committee. The applicant's written request for appeal should include any statement of fact within the applicant's knowledge or belief or other material which may have bearing on the appeal. The Town Manager shall afford the applicant the opportunity for a meeting within fifteen days following receipt of the written request. D. The Town Manager has the authority to revise the initial determination of the HCP loan or grant application. E. The Town shall prepare a summary of the matters discussed in the meeting to be included as part of the applicant's file. F. The Town Manager shall review and reconsider the initial determination of the applicant's case in light of: 1. All material upon which the Town based its original determination, including all applicable rules and regulations; 2. The reasons given by the applicant for requesting review and reconsideration of the application; 3. Any additional written or relevant documentary material submitted by the applicant; and 4. Any further information which the Town, in its discretion, obtains by request, investigation, or research to ensure fair and full review of the application. G. The determination on review by the Town Manager shall include, but is not limited to, the Town's decision or reconsideration of the application, and the factual and legal basis upon which the decision rests, including any pertinent explanation or rationale. The determination shall be in writing with a copy provided the applicant and Loan Review Committee no later than four weeks following the applicant's meeting with the Town Manager. CSD24:A:\hcp\GUIDLINE.HCP (Last Rev. 01/31/96) - 6 - INTERNAL TRACKING DEPTMENT: AGENDA ITEM: RESO/ORD NUMBER: /'9 — DATE $y '/ LIST IN BOOK ON DISC OR SHARE. FORM SENT TO DEPT. .2LL.,______, PUBLISH IF REQUIRED - Date of Publication ORDINANCES ONLY WHEN SIGNATURE AND /s/ COPY (1 EACH) returned, LIST ON SIGNATURE TRACKING & SEND TO MAYOR - MAIL TO DISTRIBUTION LIST NO.of COPIES: PROOF OF MAILING PREPARED SIGN BY CLERK/SEAL ENTER INTO ECM ORDINANCE/RESOLUTION FILE FILE IN VAULT CODIFICATION IF ORDINANCE clk:d16:\other\ordrel2 OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK ORDINANCES & RESOLUTIONS ORIGINATING DEPT: COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM: SUBJECT: Number: Date of Adopt: 4Irs c b q-46-2,t)atr-A--f RESOLUTION )qqo —1/-7 )- ) 1519(40 COUNCIL ACTION: AYES: 0170t-evt-a) NAYS: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS NAMES: Number: Date of Intro: Date of Adopt: ZONE CHANGE: ORDINANCE Joanne Benjamin, Steven Blanton, Linda Lubeck, Patrick O'Laughlin Mayor(or Chairman) RANDY ATTAWAY ORDINANCES and RESOLUTIONS MUST BE RETURNED TO TOWN CLERK BY WEDNESDAY AT 12 NOON. ORDINANCES MUST BE READY FOR IMMEDIATE PUBLICATION RESOLUTION 1996 - 47 RESOLUTION OF THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF LOS GATOS ADOPTING HOUSING CONSERVATION PROGRAM GUIDELINES AND RESCINDING RESOLUTION 1989-223 WHEREAS, the Town of Los Gatos has a Housing Conservation Program allowing it to provide Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funded low interest loans and grants to income eligible property owners for home rehabilitation purposes; and WHEREAS, the Town of Los Gatos desires to revise the guidelines which govern the Housing Conservation Program; and NOW, THEREFORE, THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF LOS GATOS DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: (1) adopt the Housing Conservation Program Guidelines attached as Exhibit A; and (2) rescind Resolution 1989-223. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: This decision constitutes a final administrative decision pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 1094.6 as adopted by section 1.10.085 of the Town Code of the Town of Los Gatos. Any application for judicial relief from this decision must be sought within the time limits and pursuant to the procedures established by Code of Civil Procedure section 1094.6, or such shorter time as required by state or federal law. CSD08:A:\RESOS\041596.R47 1 PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Town Council of the Town of Los Gatos, California, held on the 15th day of April, 1996 by the following vote: COUNCIL MEMBERS: AYES: Steven Blanton, Linda Lubeck, Patrick O'Laughlin, Mayor Randy Attaway NAYS: None ABSENT: Joanne Benjamin ABSTAIN: None SIGNED: ATTEST: /s/ Marian V. Cosgrove CLERK OF THE TOWN OF LOS GATOS LOS GATOS, CALIFORNIA CSD08:A:\RESOS\041596.R47 /s/ Randy Attaway MAYOR OF THE TOWN OF LOS GATOS LOS GATOS, CALIFORNIA 2 DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: MEETING DATE: 4-15-96 ITEM NO. COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT April 10, 1996 MAYOR AND TOWN COUNCIL TOWN MANAGER ADOPT RESOLUTION APPROVING REVISED HOUSING CONSERVATION PROGRAM GUIDELINES, INCLUDING A NEW SAFETY GRANT COMPONENT as This item was continued from April 1, 1996. Please refer to your report dated March 28, 1996. PREPARED BY: Regina A. Falkner Community Services Director Reviewed by: Attorney Finance Revised: 4/10/96 3:25 pm Reformatted: 10/23/95 OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK ORDINANCES & RESOLUTIONS ORIGINATING DEPT: COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM: SUBJECT: COMMUNITY SERVICE 04/01/96 16 HOUSING CONSERVATION PROGRAM RESOLUTION ORDINANCE Number: CONTINUED ITEM Number: Date of Adopt: 04/01/96 Date of Intro: COUNCIL ACTION: AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Date of Adopt: ZONE CHANGE: ALL COUNCIL MEMBERS NAMES: Joanne Benjamin, Steven Blanton, Linda Lubeck, Patrick O'Laughlin Mayor(or Chairman) RANDY ATTAWAY ORDINANCES and RESOLUTIONS MUST BE RETURNED TO TOWN CLERK BY WEDNESDAY AT 12 NOON. ORDINANCES MUST BE READY FOR IMMEDIATE PUBLICATION April 1, 1996 Los Gatos, California COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANTS/HOUSING/CONT: Speakers continued: Elizabeth Auton, representing Emergency Housing Consortium, San Jose, providing shelter and transitional housing and permanent supportive housing. Served 14 Los Gatans last year. No one else from the audience addressed this issue. Motion by Mrs. Lubeck, seconded by Mrs. Benjamin, to close the public hearing. Carried unanimously. Motion by Mrs. Lubeck, seconded by Mr. O'Laughlin, that Council adopt Resolution 1996-38 entitled, RESOLUTION OF THE TOWN OF LOS GATOS ALLOCATING COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT FUNDS TO THE TOWN OF LOS GATOS FOR FISCAL YEAR 1996-97, according to the Community Service Commission's recommendations with the ability of Council to adjust the amounts when they have reviewed additional information which has been requested of staff. Carried unanimously. AFFORDABLE HOUSING/HOUSING REHABILITATION PROGRAM/CDBG (07.19) Motion by Mr. Blanton, seconded by Mrs. Benjamin, to continue this item to April 15, 1996. Carried unanimously. HOUSING CONSERVATION PROGRAM/SAFETY GRANT/RESOLUTION 1996-38 (16.19) Motion by Mr. Blanton, seconded by Mrs. Benjamin, to continue this item to April 15, 1996. Carried unanimously. CONCEALED WEAPONS PERMITS/MANDATORY ISSUANCE/RESOLUTION 1996-39 (20.09) Motion by Mr. Blanton, seconded by Mrs. Lubeck, that Council adopt Resolution 1996-39 entitled, RESOLUTION OF THE TOWN OF LOS GATOS URGING THE CALIFORNIA STATE SENATE, AND IN PARTICULAR THE SENATE CRIMINAL PROCEDURE COMMITTEE, TO OPPOSE AB 638 (MANDATORY ISSUANCE OF CONCEALED WEAPONS PERMITS). Carried unanimously. OPEN SPACE MAINTENANCE/HOME OWNERS ASSOCIATIONS (10.14) Motion by Mrs. Benjamin, seconded by Mrs. Lubeck, that Council accept the report on homeowners associations, open space maintenance, and future prospects. Carried unanimously. COUNCIL COMMITTEE REPORTS (21.20) Mrs. Benjamin reported on the Santa Clara County Cities Association and a report distributed by Pat Dandow, of San Jose, which spoke of Towns and Cities contracting for services. She asked that a copy be distributed to the other Council members. ADJOURNMENT TC:D8:MM040196 11 April 15, 1996 Los Gatos, California HOUSING CONSERVATION PROGRAM GUIDELINES/RESOLUTION 1996-47 (25.19) Motion by Mrs. Lubeck, seconded by Mr. O'Laughlin, that Council adopt Resolution 1996- entitled, RESOLUTION OF THE TOWN OF LOS GATOS APPROVING REVISED HOUSING CONSERVATION PROGRAM GUIDELINES INCLUDING A NEW SAFETY GRANT COMPONENT. Carried by a vote of 4 ayes. Mrs. Benjamin was absent. ANNUAL SIDEWALK RECONSTRUCTION PROGRAM/9605 PROJECT (26.28) Motion by Mr. O'Laughlin, seconded by Mr. Blanton, that Council continue this item to May 6, 1996. Carried by a vote of 4 ayes. Mrs. Benjamin was absent. THIRD QUARTER BUDGET REPORT 1995-1996 (27.06) Motion by Mr. O'Laughlin, seconded by Mr. Blanton, that Council continue this item to May 6, 1996. Carried by a vote of 4 ayes. Mrs. Benjamin was absent. COUNCIL REPORTS There were no Council reports to be given this evening. ADJOURNMENT Motion by Mr. Blanton, seconded by Mrs. Lubeck, that this evening's meeting be adjourned at 12:25 a.m. Carried by a vote of 4 ayes. Mrs. Benjamin was absent. ATTEST: Marian V. Cosgrove Town Clerk/Secretary to the Redevelopment Agency TC:D8:MM041596.JT 23