Loading...
Item 2 - Staff Report with Exhibits - 219 Bean AvenueTOWN OF LOS GATOS ITEM NO: 2 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT 0s" cAsog Meeting Date: March 13, 2013 PREPARED BY: Jennifer L. Savage, Associate Planner s avag_eglos atgosca.gov APPLICATION NO: Planned Development Application PD-11-006 Negative Declaration ND-11-008 Architecture & Site Application S-12-098 LOCATION: 219 Bean Avenue (south side of Bean Avenue, between Tait Avenue and Victory Lane) APPLICANT/ CONTACT PERSON: Jeffrey T. Berg, AIA/Steinberg Architects PROPERTY OWNER: Roman Catholic Bishop of San Jose APPLICATION SUMMARY: Requesting approval for rezoning from R-11) & C-2 to R-1D:PD to allow for the construction of a new Jr. High School, modify existing school operations, and continue church services and activities. No significant environmental impacts have been identified as a result of this project and a Mitigated Negative Declaration is recommended. APNs 510-44-083, 510-44-084, & 510-44-028. RECOMMENDATION: PROJECT DATA: DEEMED COMPLETE: February 20, 2013 FINAL DATE TO TAKE ACTION: August 20, 2013 Approve, subject to conditions. General Plan Designation Zoning Designation: Applicable Plans & Standards: Parcel Size: Surrounding Area: Medium Density Residential, 5 - 12 dwelling units/acre R-1D - Single -Family Residential, Downtown & C-2 - Central Business District General Plan; Central Los Gatos Redevelopment Plan 4.18 acres Existing Land Use General Plan Zoning North Residential Medium Density Residential R-11) East Commercial Central Business District C-2 South Residential, Commercial, Public Parking Lot Medium Density Residential Central Business District R-11) & C-2 West Residential Medium Density Residential R-11) Planning Commission Staff Report - Page 2 219 Bean Avenue/PD-11-006/ND-11-008/5-12-098 March 13, 2013 CEQA: It has been determined that this project will not have a significant impact on the environment and a Mitigated Negative Declaration is recommended. FINDINGS: That the project will not have a significant impact on the environment and a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. That the Zone Change (Planned Development) is consistent with the General Plan. That the project is consistent with the Redevelopment Plan for the Central Los Gatos Redevelopment Project. CONSIDERATIONS: As required by Section 29.20.150 of the Town Code for granting approval of an Architecture and Site application. ACTION: 1. Forward a recommendation regarding Planned Development Application PD-11-006 and Architecture and Site Application 5-12-098 to the Town Council. 2. Forw and a recommendation regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Plan to the Town Council. EXHIBITS: Received under separate cover 1. Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration Received with this report 2. Location Map 3. Findings and Considerations 4. Recommended Conditions of Approval for Architecture and Site 5-12-098 (14 pages) 5. Mitigation Monitoring Plan (seven pages) 6. Letter of Justification (20 pages), received January 15, 2013 7. Justification for Height Exception (six pages), received September 10, 2012 8. Architectural Consultant Report (six pages), received January 2, 2013 9. Arborist Reports (48 pages), received May 1, 2012; October 17, 2012; and January 10, 2013 10. Story Pole Board (one page), received February 15, 2013 11. Planned Development Ordinance (25 pages) with Rezone Exhibit (one page), Applicant's Proposal (20 pages), and Development Plans (25 pages) Planning Commission Staff Report - Page 3 219 Bean Avenue/PD-11-006/ND-11-008/5-12-098 March 13, 2013 BACKGROUND: In April 1985, Los Gatos approved a Conditional Use Permit (CUP), Architecture and Site A&S) application, and Subdivision application to operate an existing church, elementary school, rectory, and uses accessory to the operation of the church and school. The approval included construction of new multi -purpose and religious education buildings, a new garage and parking facilities, and demolition of an existing garage. Subsequent to these approvals, St. Mary's has received numerous A&S approvals for various modifications to the site. The existing CUP allows the operation of a church with 654 seats, a school with a maximum of 265 students in grades one through eight, a rectory, a maximum of 20 employees, and uses accessory to the operation of the church and school. It is important to note that St. Mary's School and Parish is currently operating with 296 students and has operated with as many as 325 students since the 1999/2000 academic school year. If the deciding body finds merit with the subject proposal, the number of students will not change from the number of students that has existed for more than 10 years. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: A. Project Summary The proposed project includes a Planned Development application and an Architecture and Site Application. The applicant is proposing a Planned Development to rezone the subject sites from R-11) & C-2 to R-1D:PD, construction of a new Jr. High School, modification of existing school operations, and continued chur ch services and activities, including the rectory. The applicant is proposing an A&S application to demolish the existing building located at 59 Victory Lane (existing junior high school), construct a new junior high school building, demolish the existing covered eating area, construct a new covered eating area, and make minor modifications to the lower school to connect it to the new junior high school building, which is included as part of the PD application. B. Location and Surrounding Neighborhood The project site is located at 219 Bean Avenue, on the south side of Bean Avenue, between Tait Avenue and Victory Lane. The property includes the following addresses: 30 Lyndon Avenue, 49 Victory Lane, 59 Victory Lane, 59A, B, and C Victory Lane, 213 Bean Avenue, 215 Bean Avenue, and 229 Bean Avenue. There are residential uses to the north, west, and south of the property; commercial uses are located to the south and east. There is also a public parking lot to the south. Planning Commission Staff Report - Page 4 219 Bean Avenue/PD-11-006/ND-11-008/S-12-098 March 13, 2013 C. Zoning Compliance The zoning designations, currently RA D & C-2 and proposed R-1 D, allow schools and churches subject to the approval of a Conditional Use Permit or as allowed by a Planned Development (PD). Town Code allows a PD overlay on sites 40,000 square feet or greater. ANALYSTS - A. Planned Development Town Code states that the purpose of a PD is to provide for alternative uses and developments that are more consistent with site characteristics, to create an optimum quantity and use of open space, and to encourage good design. The applicant is proposing to rezone from R-ID and C-2 to R-1D:PD, modify operations outlined below), and new construction (outlined below). The applicant would continue operating the church with a maximum seating of 654, the school, rectory and uses accessory to the operation of the church and school. The Planned Development application would serve as a Master Plan for St. Mary's Church and School. Since the use encompasses three separate parcels, a performance standard has been included to merge the properties. Through the Planned Development application, the applicant is proposing the following operational changes: increase the number of students from 265 to 315; increase the number of staff from 20 to 36; and increase the class grades from one through eight to kindergarten through eight. Through the Planned Development application, the applicant is proposing the following construction: demolish the existing junior high school; constructing a new junior high school; demolish the existing covered eating area; construct a new covered eating area; remodel and addition to the lower school; demolish the teen center; and construct a new rectory. The Planned Development application incorporates the zone change, lot merger, Master Plan, and a height exception request as discussed below. The Planned Development Planning Commission Staff Report - Page 5 219 Bean Avenue/PD-11-006/ND-11-008/5-12-098 March 13, 2013 Ordinance incorporates the applicable conditions of the existing CUP and defines the operation of the uses through the performance standards and, therefore, the existing CUP is no longer required. B. Exceptions Through the PD process, the applicant is requesting the exceptions noted below and provides the justification for the exceptions in Exhibits 6 & 7. Existing Proposed Permitted Fence Height 6 feet Varies; 6 to 8 feet 6 feet; 8 feet with approval Structure Height Varies* 34'-2" feet 30 feet Existing height of 59 Victory Lane is 16 feet; of the church is 35'-10" not counting the spire. Fence Height Exception. The existing fence along the southern property line separates the lower school playground from the public parking lot and is less than six feet in height. The applicant is requesting a fence height exception to construct the walls over six feet. The proposed walls along the south and east property lines are six feet to eight feet in height. The applicant explains that the site slopes downward as you travel south to north, especially along Victory Lane (Exhibit 6). The slope causes the need for the varying height of the proposed walls, from six feet to eight feet. The school is requesting the proposed height for security reasons because there are play areas adjacent to parking lots and Victory Lane. Due to the privacy concerns and the sloping site, staff finds the fence height exception request reasonable. Structure Height Exception. As you enter the campus from Bean Avenue and travel south towards the lower school the site slopes upwards. The height of the Junior High building at the north wall would be 34'-2"; the height at the south wall would be 32'-6". The applicant is requesting a height exception to exceed the zone's 30-foot height maximum by four feet two inches. The applicant provides justification for the structure height exception (Exhibit 7). The applicant's letter regarding the justification for height requests a 36'-8" height. However, the applicant is requesting a maximum height of only 34'-2". The justification includes the height of existing St. Mary's buildings and the location of the new building in relation to the commercial structures across Victory Lane. St. Mary's church is 35'-10" tall; the C-2 zoning district across Victory Lane allows a maximum height of 45 feet. The consulting architect found the request for a height exception was reasonable because, among other factors, the building would face an open space area and create a more desirable pedestrian circulation design relating to the lower school. The applicant explains Planning Commission Staff Report - Page 6 219 Bean Avenue/PD-11-006/ND-11-008/S-12-098 March 13, 2013 that the building will be setback far from the residential neighborhood along Bean Avenue. The Planned Development application allows site development that is more consistent with site characteristics. Due to the architectural consultant's evaluation, the setback from the residential neighborhood, and the adjacent commercial zone, staff finds the height exception request reasonable. C. Parking Prior to obtaining the 1985 CUP, the church use was nonconforming due to a lack of a CUP and nonconforming as to parking. Pursuant to Town Code, a use can continue as long as it provides parking to the maximum extent possible and does not intensify. The 1985 staff report for the existing CUP found that, although the number of parking spaces was nonconforming, the existing parking was adequate for the nonconforming church use because the church added parking to the maximum extent feasible (added 23 spaces) and did not intensify (maintained a maximum of 654 church seats). The proposed increase in students and staff can be accommodated with the previously approved number of spaces. The applicant has delineated how the black top area used for school play areas would be used for church parking (Sheet A3.0 of Development Plans, Exhibit C of Exhibit 11). The table below illustrates the required, provided, and approved number of spaces. The performance standards reference the applicant's letter of justification that explains that school activities occur at different times from church activities. Use Parking Ratio Number of Staff/Seats Required` Parking* 1 space for each staff 36 36 School member 1 space for every four 654 164 Church seats of worship On -site Parking Provided 105 * * Credited Spaces in the Parking Assessment District 6 Total Parking Provided 111 Church uses of more than 68 people shall not operate concurrently with school so that the uses together will not exceed the parking provided. This requirement is included in the Planned Development Ordinance performance standards. Includes one onsite space in the Parking Assessment District. One of the lots is located in the parking assessment district. This lot has one onsite parking space and six parking credits. As required by Town Code, the plans propose to maintain the one onsite parking space, which will be one of the 105 onsite parking spaces for St. Mary's School and Parish. Planning Commission Staff Report - Page 7 219 Bean Avenue/PD-11-006/ND-11-008/5-12-098 March 13, 2013 When the existing CUP was approved in 1985, the use had 82 parking spaces and proposed to add 23 more, for a total of 105 parking spaces. The applicant proposes 105 onsite parking spaces, which is consistent with the previous approval. In addition, the use has six parking spaces in the parking assessment district, for a total of I I I spaces. D. Traffic The proposal would not increase the number of trips that exist since the number of students, which the trip generation is based on, would not increase from the current number of students. However, the permitted number of students would increase from the number of students allowed by the current CUP. Therefore, a Traffic Study was prepared for the proposed project (included as Attachment 6 of the Initial Study, Exhibit 1). The report concluded that the increase in student enrollment above the permitted student enrollment is estimated to have resulted in 45 a.m. peak hour trips and 30 school p.m. peak hour (2:30 p.m. to 3:30 p.m.) trips. All of the intersections studied currently operate at acceptable levels of service of LOS D or better. These intersections operate at the same levels of service that would occur without the 50-student increase. In other words, there is no level of service difference with or without the 50 students above the permitted number of students. There is one exception to the acceptable LOS intersections — the intersection of Los Gatos - Saratoga Road and Massol Avenue, a one-way stop controlled intersection. The northbound left -turn movement from Massol Avenue onto Los Gatos -Saratoga Road is estimated at LOS F during a.m. and school p.m. peak hours, with or without the 50 students above the permitted number of students. However, the low volume of northbound left - turning traffic does not currently warrant the installation of a traffic signal. Town staff will continue to monitor the intersection to determine whether a traffic signal or other improvements may be needed in the future. The traffic study found the increase in the number of students above the permitted levels did not result in changes to the study intersections level of services. Therefore, no traffic or street improvements are required. However, traffic mitigation fees are required and the requirement is included as a performance standard. E. Community Benefit Pursuant to the Town's Traffic Impact Policy, a project that generates additional traffic of five or more peak hour trips may only be approved if the project's benefits to the community override the traffic impacts. Community benefit must be offered by the Planning Commission Staff Report - Page 8 219 Bean Avenue/PD-11-006/ND-11-008/S-1 March 13, 2013 applicant, and the applicant must provide justification that the proposed community benefit offsets a project's impacts. The proposal would not increase the number of trips that exist since the number of students, which the trip generation is based on, would not increase from the current number of students. However, the applicant offers the activities of St. Mary's church and school as community benefits in the letter of justification (Exhibit 6) including religious programs and services, community meeting space, the Country Fair, and nonprofit organization events. The Planning Commission shall determine whether the community benefit being offered sufficiently outweighs the traffic impacts caused by the project. F. Architecture & Site Application Through the subject A&S application, the applicant is proposing the following construction, which is consistent with the proposed Planned Development: demolish the existing junior high school construct a new junior high school demolish the existing covered eating area construct a new covered eating area modifications to the lower school to accommodate a connection to the new junior high school The addition to the lower school, demolition of the teen center, and construction of a new rectory require separate A&S applications. The applicant is proposing the work on the junior high school and covered eating area as the first phase of changes. When the applicant is ready to complete the remainder of the work, they will be required to apply for appropriate permits from the Town including A&S. Staff recommends that the future A&S applications be reviewed by the DRC. This recommendation is included as a performance standard. The architecture and height of the church related residential structure would be reviewed through a future A&S application and height poles would be required at that time. G. Architectural Consultant Review The Planned Development and A&S applications were reviewed by the Town's Architectural Consultant (Exhibit 8). The consultant found that the applicant responded well to the recommendations, which are incorporated into the development plans (Exhibit C of Exhibit 11). Planning Commission Staff Report - Page 9 219 Bean Avenue/PD-11-006/ND-11-008/5-12-098 March 13, 2013 As stated earlier, the Town's Architectural Consultant also reviewed the applicant's request to exceed the height allowed by the zone. The consultant found the height request reasonable given that the junior high school would face a large open space and accommodate pedestrian access between the junior high school and the lower school. The consultant also found that ways to reduce the height may result in undesirable consequences to the project including inefficient pedestrian flow and unacceptable building design. H. Trees The project was reviewed by the Town's Arborist Consultant (Exhibit 9). The project would result in the removal of three trees (a 15" diameter tree of heaven, a multi -trunk loquat, and a 4" crepe myrtle). The applicant worked closely with the arborist to retain most of the existing trees including a large multi -trunk coast live oak tree. Tree protection measures are incorporated as conditions of approval to protect the existing trees on the subject property and within the development area, including measures recommended by the consulting arborist. The applicant will be required to plant replacement trees onsite pursuant to Town Code. I. General Plan The goals and policies of the 2020 General Plan applicable to this project include but are not limited to: Policy LU-6.1 — Protect existing residential areas from the impacts of non-residential development. Policy LU-6.2 — Allow non-residential activity in residential areas only when the character and quality of the neighborhood can be maintained. Policy TRA-3.1 — All development proposals shall be reviewed to identify and mitigate project traffic impacts pursuant to the Town's traffic impact policy. Policy TRA-3.4 — New projects shall not cause the level of service for intersections to drop more than one level if it is at Level A, B, or C and not drop at all if it is at D or below. Policy TRA-9.6 — Require development proposals to include amenities that encourage alternate forms of transportation that reduce pollution or traffic congestion as a benefit to the community. Policy NOI-2.2 — Require all noise -sensitive developments adjacent to or within an area where noise levels exceed community aspirations to include a noise study and recommendation for reducing noise impact to an acceptable level. Policy NOI-5.1 — Protect residential areas from noise by requiring appropriate site and building design, sounds walls, and landscaping and by the use of noise attenuating construction techniques and materials. Planning Commission Staff Report - Page 10 219 Bean Avenue/PD-11-006/ND-11-008/S-12-098 March 13, 2013 J. CEOA Determination An Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) were prepared for this project (Exhibit 1). The following topics were identified and required mitigation: Air Quality — The mitigation measure addresses dust and criteria pollutant emissions control measures. Cultural Resources — The mitigation measures address encountering cultural resources. Hazards — The mitigation measure addresses recommendations to test for and, if necessary, provide protection for lead -based paint abatement. Noise — The mitigation measure addresses noise impacts to adjacent residential uses related to the grass playfield and construction measures for noise reduction. The mitigation measures are included as condition of approvals and a Mitigation Monitoring Plan was prepared (Exhibit 5). The comment period for the Mitigated Negative Declaration began on February 12, 2013 and ended on March 5, 2013. Story Poles Due to safety and operational concerns for the students and staff during the school year due to the location of the story poles an exception was previously approved to allow story poles to be installed from August 1 to 15, 2012. The Planning Commission and Town Council were notified at that time to review the installed poles. Photographs of the installed story poles are included as Exhibit 10. PUBLIC COMMENTS: At this time, the Town has not received any public comment. SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION: A. Summary The project would permit updates to the existing St. Mary's School and Parish operations and facilities including creating a Master Plan, allowing a new well -designed Junior High School, and updating the permitted number of students and staff to levels used today. Town staff and the consulting architect believe that the request to permit the new Junior High School to exceed the height limit is acceptable given that the building would be located towards the commercial uses that front on N. Santa Cruz Avenue and would not exceed the height of other structures already located on the St. Mary's property. Planning Commission Staff Report - Page 11 219 Bean Avenue/PD-11-006/ND-11-008/S-12-098 March 13, 2013 B. Recommendation Based on the summary above, staff recommends approval of the Planned Development and Architecture and Site applications. The Planning Commission should take the following actions to forward the Mitigated Negative Declaration, Planned Development and Architecture and Site applications to the Town Council with a recommendation for approval: 1. Make the required findings (see Exhibit 3); 2. Recommend that the Town Council make the Mitigated Negative Declaration and adopt the Mitigation Monitoring Plan (Exhibit 5); 3. Recommend that the Town Council adopt the Planned Development Ordinance Exhibit 11) and approve the project as proposed; and 4. Recommend that the Town Council approve Architecture and Site application S-12-098 with recommended conditions of approval in Exhibit 4. Please note that the approval for the Architecture and Site application is contingent upon Town Council adoption of the Planned Development application. If the Commission has concerns with the application, it can: 1. Forward a recommendation for denial of the Planned Development Application to the Town Council; or 2. Continue the matter to a date certain with specific direction. Prepared by: j Approved by: Jennifer L. Savage, AICP Todd Capurso Associate Planner Acting Director of Community Development TC:JS:ct cc: Jeffrey T. Berg, AIA/Steinberg Architects, 60 Pierce Avenue, San Jose, CA 95110 Roman Catholic Bishop of San Jose, 900 Lafayette, Suite 301, Santa Clara, CA 95050 N:\DEV\PC REP0RTS\2013\Bean219.docx 219 Bean Avenue it •... ` //' ^^. ^ ; / ' ,.. ., / LLIIt At 41, cr E rI •..ff t l L EXHIBIT PLANNING COMMISSION —March 13, 2013 REQUIRED FINDINGS FOR: 219 Bean Avenue Planned Development Application PD-11-006 Negative Declaration ND-11-008 Architecture and Site Application 5-12-098 Requesting approval for rezoning from R-11) & C-2 to R-ID:PD to allow for the construction of a new Jr. High School, modify existing school operations, and continue church services and activities. No significant environmental impacts have been identified as a result of this and a Mitigated Negative Declaration is recommended. APNs 510-44- 083, 510-44-084, & 510-44-028. PROPERTY OWNER: Roman Catholic Bishop of San Jose APPLICANT: Jeffrey T. Berg, AIA/Steinberg Architects FINDINGS: Required finding for CEQA: No significant impacts have been identified and a Mitigated Negative Declaration is recommended for the proposed project. Required consistency with the Town's General Plan: That the proposed Zone Change is consistent with the General Plan and its Elements in that the Planned Development overlay allows school and church uses that are consistent with the property's zoning district. Required finding for the Redevelopment Plan for the Central Los Gatos Redevelopment Project Area: That the proposed project is consistent with the Redevelopment Plan for the Central Los Gatos Redevelopment Project Area (Section IV.B) in that the Redevelopment Plan permits the maintenance and enlargement of educational and religious institutions. As required by the Town's Traffic Impact Policy: Projects that generate additional traffic of five or more peak hour trips may only be recommended for approval if the project's benefits to the community override the traffic impacts as determined by specific sections of the General Plan and/or any Specific Plan. If a project generates additional traffic of five or more peak hour trips the burden is on the applicant to cite economic or housing benefits to the Town and/or specific sections of the General Plan and any applicable Specific Plan that demonstrate the project's benefit to the Community which outweighs the traffic impact. The deciding body must make specific findings which demonstrate that the benefit(s) of the project outweigh the impact in order to approve the project. HIIN I 3 The benefits of the project to the Town outweigh the impact of increased traffic in that the applicant has offered the following Community Benefit: the activities of St. Mary's church and school, including but not limited to religious programs and services, community meeting space, the Country Fair, and nonprofit organization events. CONSIDERATIONS Required considerations in review of Architecture & Site applications: As required by Section 29.20.150 of the Town Code, the considerations in review of an Architecture and Site application were all made in reviewing this project. N:\DE V\F INDINGS\2013 \B EAN219. DOCX CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL —March 13, 2013 For the Architecture and Site Application 219 Bean Avenue Negative Declaration ND-11-008 Architecture and Site Application S-12-098 Requesting approval to allow for the construction of a new Jr. High School. If no significant environmental impacts are identified as a result of this project, a Mitigated Negative Declaration will be prepared. APNs 510-44-083, 510-44-084, & 510-44-028. PROPERTY OWNER: Roman Catholic Bishop of San Jose APPLICANT: Jeffrey T. Berg, AIA/Steinberg Architects TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT: Planning Division 1. APPROVAL: This application shall be completed in accordance with all of the conditions of approval listed below and applicable performance standards in the Planned Development, and in substantial compliance with the plans approved and noted as received by the Town on January 15, 2013. Any changes or modifications to the approved plans shall be approved by the Community Development Director, the Development Review Committee, the Planning Commission, or Town Council, depending on the scope of the changes. 2. PLANNED DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL: This approval is contingent upon the adoption of Planned Development Application PD-11-006. This Architecture and Site application cannot obtain permits for any work related to this application until the Planned Development Ordinance is effective. 3. OUTDOOR LIGHTING: Exterior lighting shall be kept to a minimum, and shall be down directed fixtures that will not reflect or encroach onto adjacent properties. No flood lights shall be used unless it can be demonstrated that they are needed for safety or security. The lighting plan shall be reviewed during building plan check. 4. GENERAL: All existing trees shown on the plan and trees required to remain or to be planted are specific subjects of approval of this plan, and must remain on the site. 5. TREE REMOVAL PERMIT: A Tree Removal Permit shall be obtained for any trees to be removed, prior to the issuance of a building or grading permit. 6. TREE FENCING: Protective tree fencing shall be placed at the drip line of existing trees prior to issuance of demolition and building permits and shall remain through all phases of construction. Include a tree protection fencing plan with the construction plans. 7. ARBORIST RECOMMENDATIONS: All recommendations made by the Town's Consulting Arborist, Deborah Ellis, shall be implemented to eliminate or minimize construction -related impacts on the trees to be retained. Recommendations are listed in the May 1, 2012, October 17, 2012, and January 10, 2013, arborist's reports. The report also provides recommendations for Protection Measures before and during development, encompassing fencing, removal of hardscape, demolition, work within tree canopies, etc. Tree protection specifications shall be printed on the construction plans. A Compliance Memorandum shall be prepared by the applicant and submitted with the building permit application detailing how the recommendations have or will be addressed. These recommendations must be incorporated in the building permit plans, and completed prior to issuance of a building permit where applicable. wiBri.r 4 8. RECYCLING: All wood, metal, glass and aluminum materials generated from the demolished structure shall be deposited to a company which will recycle the materials. Receipts from the company(s) accepting these materials, noting type and weight of material, shall be submitted to the Town prior to the Towns demolition inspection. 9. LANDSCAPE WATER EFFICIENCY: This project is subject to the Town's Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance, Chapter 26, Article IV of the Town Code or the State Water Efficiency Ordinance, whichever is more restrictive. A fee as established by Town Council resolution shall be paid when the landscape, irrigation plans, and water calculations are submitted for review prior to the issuance of building permit. 10. TOWN INDEMNITY: Applicants are notified that Town Code Section 1.10.115 requires that any applicant who receives a permit or entitlement from the Town shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the Town and its officials in any action brought by a third party to overturn, set aside, or void the permit or entitlement. This requirement is a condition of approval of all such permits and entitlements whether or not expressly set forth in the approval, and may be secured to the satisfaction of the Town Attorney. Building Division 11. PERMITS REQUIRED: A building permit shall be required for the construction of the new Jr. High School building and a separate building permit to modify the existing Grammar School building. Separate permits are required for electrical, mechanical, and plumbing work as necessary. 12. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: The Conditions of Approval must be blue -lined in full on the cover sheet of the construction plans. A Compliance Memorandum shall be prepared and submitted with the building permit application detailing how the Conditions of Approval will be addressed. 13. SIZE OF PLANS: Four sets of construction plans, maximum size 24" x 36." 14. SOILS REPORT: A soils report, prepared to the satisfaction of the Building Official, containing foundation and retaining wall design recommendations is required to be submitted with the building permit application. This report shall be prepared by a licensed civil engineer specializing in soils mechanics. 15. FOUNDATION INSPECTIONS: A pad certificate prepared by a licensed civil engineer or land surveyor shall be submitted to the project building inspector at foundation inspection. This certificate shall certify compliance with the recommendations as specified in the soils report and that the building pad elevation, on -site retaining wall locations and elevations have been prepared according to approved plans. Horizontal and vertical controls shall be set and certified by a licensed surveyor or registered civil engineer for the following items: a. Building pad elevation b. Finish floor elevation c. Foundation corner locations d. Retaining Walls 16. BACKWATER VALVE: The scope of this project may require the installation of a sanitary sewer backwater valve per Town Ordinance 6.50.025. Please provide information on the plans if a backwater valve is required and the location of the installation. The Town of Los Gatos Ordinance and West Valley Sanitation District (WVSD) requires backwater valves on drainage piping serving fixtures that have flood level rims less than 12-inches above the elevation of the next upstream manhole. 17. TITLE 24 — COMMERCIAL: The buildings shall comply with the latest California Title 24 Accessibility Standards. Necessary work shall be first investigated by the design Architect, and then confirmed by Town staff. 18. SPECIAL INSPECTIONS: When a special inspection is required by CBC Section 1704, the Architect or Engineer of record shall prepare an inspection program that shall be submitted to the Building Official for approval prior to issuance of the building permit. The Town Special Inspection form must be completely filled -out, signed by all requested parties, and be blue - lined on the construction plans. Special Inspection forms are available from the Building Division Service Counter or online at www.losgatosca.gov/building 19. NONPOINT SOURCE POLLUTION STANDARDS SHEET: The Town standard Santa Clara County Valley Nonpoint Source Pollution Control Program Sheet (or Clean Bay Sheet 2406) shall be part of the plan submittal as the second page. The specification sheet is available at the Building Division Service Counter for a fee of $2 or at ARC (formerly known as San Jose Blue Print) for a fee. 20. NPDES-C.3 DATA FORM: A copy of the NPDES C.3 Data Form (updated based on the final construction drawings) must be blue -lined in full on the plans. In the event that this data differs significantly from any Planning approvals, the Town may require recertification of the project's storm water treatment facilities prior to release of the Building Permit. 21. PLANS: The construction plans shall be prepared under the direct supervision of a licensed Architect or Engineer. (Business and Professionals Code Section 5538) 22. APPROVALS REQUIRED: The project requires the following departments and agencies approval before issuing a building permit: a. Community Development -Planning Division: Jennifer Savage (408) 399-5702 b. Engineering/Parks & Public Works Department: Maziar Bozorginia (408) 395-3460 c. Santa Clara County Fire Department: (408) 378-4010 d. West Valley Sanitation District: (408) 378-2407 e. Local School District: The Town will forward the paperwork to the appropriate school district(s) for processing. A copy of the paid receipt is required prior to permit issuance. 23. *AIR QUALITY MITIGATION MEASURE-1: Basic construction measures. To limit the project's construction -related dust and criteria pollutant emissions, the following BAAQMD- recommended Basic Construction Mitigation Measures shall be included in the project's grading plan, building plans, and contract specifications: a. All exposed surfaces (e.g., parking areas, staging areas, soil piles, graded areas, and unpaved access roads) shall be watered two times per day. b. All haul trucks transporting soil, sand, or other loose material off -site shall be covered. c. All visible mud or dirt track -out onto adjacent public roads shall be removed using wet power vacuum street sweepers at least once per day. The use of dry power sweeping is prohibited. d. All vehicle speeds on unpaved roads shall be limited to 15 mph. e. All roadways, driveways, and sidewalks to be paved shall be completed as soon as possible. f. Idling times shall be minimized either by shutting equipment off when not in use or reducing the maximum idling time to five minutes (as required by the California airborne toxics control measure Title 13, Section 2485 of California Code of Regulations [CCR]). Clear signage shall be provided for construction workers at all access points. g. All construction equipment shall be maintained and properly tuned in accordance with manufacturer's specifications. All equipment shall be checked by a certified mechanic and determined to be running in proper condition prior to operation. h. Post a publicly visible sign with the telephone number and person to contact at the Town regarding dust complaints. This person shall respond and take corrective action within 48 hours. The BAAQMD's phone number shall also be visible to ensure compliance with applicable regulations. 24. *CULTURAL RESOURCES MITIGATION MEASURE-1: Alert Construction Personnel. Construction personnel involved with earthmoving shall be alerted to the potential for the discovery of prehistoric materials and in particular, concentrations of historic artifacts. Prehistoric archaeological resources could include but not be limited to the following: darker than surrounding soils of a friable nature, concentrations of stone, bone or fresh water shellfish, artifacts of these materials, and evidence of fire (ash, charcoal, fire altered earth or rock) and of course, burials, both human and animal. 25. *CULTURAL RESOURCES MITIGATION MEASURE-2: Halt of Construction If Archaeological Traces Are Encountered. In the event that archaeological traces are encountered, all construction within a 20-foot radius of the find shall be halted, the Community Development Director shall be notified, and an archaeologist shall be retained to examine the find and make appropriate recommendations. 26. *CULTURAL RESOURCES MITIGATION MEASURE-3: Plan for Eligible Resources. In the event that it appears further earthmoving will affect a resource eligible for the California Register of Historic Resource (CRHR), a plan for evaluation of the resource through limited hand excavation should be submitted to the Town's Community Development Department for approval. If evaluative testing demonstrates that the project will affect a CRHR eligible resource, a plan for the mitigation of impacts to the resource should be submitted to the Community Development Department for approval before construction is allowed inside the zone designated as archaeologically sensitive. 27. *CULTURAL RESOURCES MITIGATION MEASURE-4: Preliminary Archaeological Report. If the Community Development Director finds that the archaeological find is not a significant resource, work will resume only after the submittal of a preliminary archaeological report and after provisions for reburial and ongoing monitoring are accepted. Provisions for identifying descendants of a deceased Native American and for reburial will follow the protocol set forth in CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5(e). If the site is found to be a significant archaeological site, a mitigation program will be prepared and submitted to the Community Development Director for consideration and approval, in conformance with the protocol set forth in Public Resources Code Section 21083.2. 28. *CULTURAL RESOURCES MITIGATION MEASURE-5: Final Archaeological Report. A final report shall be prepared when a find is determined to be a significant archaeological site, and/or when Native American remains are found on the site. The final report will include background information on the completed work, a description and list of identified resources, the disposition and curation of these resources, any testing, other recovered information, and conclusions. 29. *HAZARDS MITIGATION MEASURE-1: Abatement of Lead -Based Paints. Prior to proposed building demolition, construction finish materials that are suspect for containing lead -based paint will be tested, and pending laboratory analysis, will not be subjected to any process which renders them friable unless proper engineering controls and worker protection procedures are initiated. 30. *NOISE MITIGATION MEASURE-1: Noise Barrier. To reduce excess noise from the playfield activity at the residence at 30 Tait Avenue, the project applicant will construct a six-foot high solid board fence along the property line between the playfield and the home at 30 Tait Avenue. The barrier height is in reference to the nearest playfield ground elevation. Figure 3 of Attached 5 of the Initial Study delineates the location of the noise control barrier. The fence will be constructed of minimum 1-inch thick (nom.) redwood boards nailed tight such that no gaps are visible. Cracks, gaps, knotholes are no permitted. No openings are permitted between the upper fence components and the ground. 31. *NOISE MITIGATION MEASURE-2: Recommended Construction Measures. Although there would be no significant noise impact under CEQA or construction -related noise mitigation required under CEQA, project -related demolition and construction noise at the site could be reduced by using quiet or "new technology" equipment. The greatest potential for noise abatement of current equipment should be the quieting of exhaust noise by use of improved mufflers. It is recommended that all internal combustion engines used at the project site be equipped with a type of muffler recommended by the vehicle manufacturer. In addition, all equipment should be in good mechanical condition so as to minimize noise created by faulty or poorly maintained engine, drive -train and other components. Demolition and construction noise could also be mitigated by the following: a. Schedule construction operations that comply with the limits of the Town of Los Gatos Noise Ordinance. b. Limit the use of equipment close to sensitive receptor properties. c. Utilizing temporary berms or noise barriers, such as lumber or other material stockpiles and the construction trailers or other non -noisy long-term structures. d. Place long-term stationary equipment as far away from the residential areas as possible. e. Keep mobile equipment (haul trucks, concrete trucks, etc.) off of local streets as much as possible. f. A noise reduction benefit can also be achieved by appropriate selection of equipment utilized for various operations, subject to equipment availability and cost considerations, the following recommendations for minimizing impacts on the surrounding area are offered: i. Earth Removal: Use scrapers as much as possible for earth removal, rather than the noisier loaders and hauling trucks. ii. Ground Preparation: Use a motor grader rather than a bulldozer for final grading. iii. Building Construction: Power saws should be shielded or enclosed where practical to decrease noise emissions. Nail guns should be used where possible as they are less noisy than manual hammering. iv. Generators and Compressors: Use generators and compressors that are housed in acoustical enclosures rather than weather enclosures or none at all. TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE DIRECTOR OF PARKS AND PUBLIC WORKS: Engineering Division 32. GENERAL: All public improvements shall be made according to the latest adopted Town Standard Drawings and the Town Standard Specifications. All work shall conform to the applicable Town ordinances. The adjacent public right-of-way shall be kept clear of all job related dirt and debris at the end of the day. Dirt and debris shall not be washed into storm drainage facilities. The storing of goods and materials on the sidewalk and/or the street will not be allowed unless a special permit is issued. The developer's representative in charge shall be at the job site during all working hours. Failure to maintain the public right-of-way according to this condition may result in the Town performing the required maintenance at the developer's expense. 33. ENCROACHMENT PERMIT: All work in the public right-of-way will require a Construction Encroachment Permit. All work over $5,000 will require construction security. It is the responsibility of the applicant/developer to obtain any necessary encroachment permits from affected agencies and private parties, including but not limited to, Pacific Gas and Electric (PG&E), SBC, Comcast, Santa Clara Valley Water District, California Department of Transportation. Copies of any approvals or permits must be submitted to the Town Engineering Department prior to releasing of any permit. 34. PUBLIC WORKS INSPECTIONS: The developer or his representative shall notify the Engineering Inspector at least twenty-four (24) hours before starting any work pertaining to on -site drainage facilities, grading or paving, and all work in the Town's right-of-way. Failure to do so will result in rejection of work that went on without inspection. 35. RESTORATION OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS: The developer shall repair or replace all existing improvements not designated for removal that are damaged or removed because of developer's operations. Improvements such as, but not limited to: curbs, gutters, sidewalks, driveways, signs, pavements, raised pavement markers, thermoplastic pavement markings, etc. shall be repaired and replaced to a condition equal to or better than the original condition. Existing improvement to be repaired or replaced shall be at the direction of the Engineering Construction Inspector, and shall comply with all Title 24 Disabled Access provisions. Developer shall request a walk-through with the Engineering Construction Inspector before the start of construction to verify existing conditions. 36. SITE SUPERVISION: The General Contractor shall provide qualified supervision on the job site at all times during construction. 37. STREET/SIDEWALK CLOSURE: Any proposed blockage or partial closure of the sidewalk requires an encroachment permit. Special provisions such as limitations on works hours, protective enclosures, or other means to facilitate public access in a safe manner may be required. 38. PLAN CHECK FEES: Plan check fees shall be deposited with the Town prior to plan review at the Engineering Division of the Parks and Public Works Department 39. INSPECTION FEES: Inspection fees shall be deposited with the Town prior to issuance of any Permit or recordation of the Final Map. 40. DESIGN CHANGES: Any proposed changes to the approved plans shall be subject to the approval of the Town prior to when altered work is started. The Applicant Project Engineer shall notify, in writing, the Town Engineer at least 72 hours in advance of all the proposed changes. Any approved changes shall be incorporated into the final "as -built" plans. 41. PLANS AND STUDIES: All required plans and studies shall be prepared by a Registered Professional Engineer in the State of California, and submitted to the Town Engineer for review and approval. 42. GRADING PERMIT: Grading permit is required for all site grading and drainage work except for exemptions listed in Section 12.20.015 of the Town Grading Ordinance. The grading permit application (with grading plans) shall be made to the Engineering Division of the Parks & Public Works Department located at 41 Miles Avenue. The grading plans shall include final grading, drainage, retaining wall location, driveway, utilities and interim erosion control. Grading plans shall list earthwork quantities and a table of existing and proposed impervious areas. Unless specifically allowed by the Director of Parks and Public Works, the grading permit will be issued concurrently with the building permit. The grading permit is for work outside the building footprint(s). A separate building permit, issued by the Building Department on E. Main Street is needed for grading within the building footprint. 43. CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT: Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, it shall be the sole responsibility of the owner/applicant to obtain any and all proposed or required easements and/or permissions necessary to perform the grading herein proposed. Proof of agreement/approval is required prior to issuance of any Permit. 44. DRAINAGE STUDY: Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, the following drainage studies shall be submitted to and approved by the Town Engineer: A drainage study of the project including diversions, off -site areas that drain onto and/or through the project, and justification of any diversions; a drainage study evidencing that proposed drainage patterns will not overload existing storm drains; and detailed drainage studies indicating how the project grading, in conjunction with the drainage conveyance systems including applicable swales, channels, street flows, catch basins, storm drains, and flood water retarding, will allow building pads to be safe from inundation from rainfall runoff which may be expected from all storms up to and including the theoretical 100-year flood. 45. TREE REMOVAL: Copies of all necessary tree removal permits shall be provided prior to issuance of a grading permit/building permit. 46. SURVEYING CONTROLS: Horizontal and vertical controls shall be set and certified by a licensed surveyor or registered civil engineer qualified to practice land surveying, for the following items: a. Retaining wall --top of wall elevations and locations b. Toe and top of cut and fill slopes 47. PAD CERTIFICATION: A letter from a licensed land surveyor shall be provided stating that the building foundation was constructed in accordance with the approved plans shall be provided subsequent to foundation construction and prior to construction on the structure. The pad certification shall address both vertical and horizontal foundation placement. 48. PRECONSTRUCTION MEETING: Prior to issuance of any permit or the commencement of any site work, the general contractor shall: a. Along with the project applicant, attend a pre -construction meeting with the Town Engineer to discuss the project conditions of approval, working hours, site maintenance and other construction matters; b. Acknowledge in writing that they have read and understand the project conditions of approval, and will make certain that all project sub -contractors have read and understand them prior to commencing work and that a copy of the project conditions of approval will be posted on site at all times during construction. 49. CERTIFICATE OF LOT MERGER: A Certificate of Lot Merger shall be recorded. Two copies of the legal description for exterior boundary of the merged parcel and a plat map (8- 1/2 in. X 11 in.) shall be submitted to the Engineering Division of the Parks & Public Works Department for review and approval. The submittal shall include closure calculations, title reports less than 90 days old and the appropriate fee. The certificate shall be recorded before any permits may be issued. 50. SOILS REPORT: One copy of the soils report shall be submitted with the grading permit application. The soils report shall include specific criteria and standards governing site grading, drainage, pavement design, retaining wall design and erosion control. The reports shall be signed and "wet stamped" by the engineer or geologist, in conformance with Section 6735 of the California Business and Professions Code. 51. SOILS REVIEW: Prior to issuance of any permit, the applicant's soils engineer shall review the final grading and drainage plans to ensure that designs for foundations, retaining walls, site grading, and site drainage are in accordance with their recommendations and the peer review comments. The applicant's soils engineer's approval shall then be conveyed to the Town either by letter or by signing the plans. 52. SOILS ENGINEER CONSTRUCTION OBSERVATION: During construction, all excavations and grading shall be inspected by the applicant's soils engineer prior to placement of concrete and/or backfill so they can verify that the actual conditions are as anticipated in the design -level geotechnical report, and recommend appropriate changes in the recommendations contained in the report, if necessary. The results of the construction observation and testing should be documented in an "as -built" letter/report prepared by the applicants' soils engineer and submitted to the Town before final release of any occupancy permit is granted. 53. WATER DESIGN: Water plans prepared by SJWC must be reviewed and approved prior to issuance of any permit. 54. FRONTAGE IMPROVEMENTS: Applicant shall be required to improve the project's public frontage to current Town Standards. These improvements may include but not limited to curb, gutter, sidewalk, driveway approaches, curb ramps, traffic signal, street lighting upgrade and/or repaint) etc. 55. UTILITIES: The Developer shall install all new, relocated, or temporarily removed utility services, including telephone, electric power and all other communications lines underground, as required by Town Code Section 27.50.015(b). All new utility services shall be placed underground. Underground conduit shall be provided for cable television service. Applicant is required to obtain approval of all proposed utility alignments from any and all utility service providers. The Town of Los Gatos does not approve or imply approval for final alignment or design of these facilities. 56. SIDEWALK CLOSURE: Any proposed blockage or partial closure of the sidewalk requires an encroachment permit. Special provisions such as limitations on works hours, protective enclosures, or other means to facilitate public access in a safe manner may be required. 57. SIDEWALK REPAIR: The developer shall repair and replace to existing Town standards any sidewalk damaged now or during construction of this project. Sidewalk repair shall match existing color, texture and design, and shall be constructed per Town Standard Details. The limits of sidewalk repair will be determined by the Engineering Construction Inspector during the construction phase of the project. 58. CURB AND GUTTER: The developer shall repair and replace to existing Town standards any curb and gutter damaged now or during construction of this project. New curb and gutter shall be constructed per Town Standard Details. The limits of curb and gutter repair will be determined by the Engineering Construction Inspector during the construction phase of the project. 59. DRIVEWAY APPROACH: The developer shall install commercial driveway approach. The new driveway approach shall be constructed per Town Standard Details. 60. FENCING: Any fencing proposed within 200-feet of an intersection shall comply with Town Code Section §23.10.080. 61. SIGHT TRIANGLE AND TRAFFIC VIEW AREA: Any proposed improvements, including but not limiting to trees and hedges, will need to abide by Town Code Section 23.10.080, 26.10.065, 29.40.030. 62. AS -BUILT PLANS: After completion of the construction of all work, the original plans shall have all changes (change orders and field changes) clearly marked. The "as -built" plans shall again be signed and "wet -stamped" by the civil engineer who prepared the plans, attesting to the changes. The original "as -built" plans shall be review and approved the Engineering Inspector. A Mylar and AutoCAD disk of the approved "as -built" plans shall be provided to the Town before the Faithful Performance Security or Occupancy Permit is released. The AutoCAD file shall include only the following information and shall conform to the layer naming convention: a) Building Outline, Layer: BLDG-OUTLINE; b) Driveway, Layer: DRIVEWAY; c) Retaining Wall, Layer: RETAINING WALL; d) Swimming Pool, Layer: SWIMMING -POOL; e) Tennis Court, Layer: TENNIS -COURT; f) Property Line, Layer: PROPERTY -LINE; g) Contours, Layer: NEWCONTOUR. All as -built digital files must be on the same coordinate basis as the Town's survey control network and shall be submitted in AutoCAD version 2000 or higher. 63. TRAFFIC STUDY: Any development of land use that generates greater traffic impacts than those assumed in the St. Mary's School Expansion Traffic Study (dated July 12, 2012) shall require an updated traffic study utilizing a methodology approved by the Town. The Town may impose additional conditions on the applicant or development based on the updated Town -approved traffic study. 64. CONSTRUCTION TRAFFIC: All construction traffic and related vehicular routes shall be submitted for review and approval by the Town Engineer prior to issuance of permit. 65. TRAFFIC IMPACT MITIGATION FEE: The developer shall pay a fee proportional to the project's share of transportation improvement needed to serve cumulative development within the Town of Los Gatos. The fee amount will be based upon the Town Council resolution in effect at the time the building permit application is made. The fee shall be paid before the building permit is issued. The traffic impact mitigation fee for this project, using the current fee schedule and the preliminary plans is $11,494.98. The final fee shall be calculated from the final plans using the rate schedule in effect at the time of the building permit application, using a trip generation rate based on commercial use. 66. TRAFFIC IMPACT COMMUNITY BENEFIT: The developer is required to provide Community Benefit based on the Town Traffic Impact Policy. 67. CONSTRUCTION STREET PARKING: No vehicle having a manufacture's rated gross vehicle weight exceeding ten thousand (10,000) pounds shall be allowed to park on the portion of a street which abuts property in a residential zone without prior to approval from the Town Engineer. 68. TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN: The project sponsor will be required to work with the Engineering Division of the Parks and Public Works Department to develop a traffic control plan for incorporation into the construction bid documents (specifications), and this plan will include, but not be limited to, the following measures: a. Construction activities shall be strategically timed and coordinated to minimize traffic disruption for schools, residents, businesses, special events, and other projects in the area. The schools located on the haul route shall be contacted to help with the coordination of the trucking operation to minimize traffic disruption. b. Flag persons shall be placed at locations necessary to control one-way traffic flow. All flag persons shall have the capability of communicating with each other to coordinate the operation. c. Prior to construction, advance notification of all affected residents and emergency services shall be made regarding one-way operation, specifying dates and hours of operation. 69. HAULING OF SOIL: Hauling of soil on or off -site shall not occur during the morning or evening peak periods (between 7:00 a.m. and 9:00 a.m. and between 4:00 p.m. and 6:00 p.m.). Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the developer shall work with the Town Building and Engineering Department Engineering Inspectors to devise a traffic control plan to ensure safe and efficient traffic flow under periods when soil is hauled on or off the project site. This may include, but is not limited to provisions for the developer/owner to place construction notification signs noting the dates and time of construction and hauling activities, or providing additional traffic control. Coordination with other significant projects in the area may also be required. Cover all trucks hauling soil, sand, and other loose debris or require all trucks to maintain at least two feet of freeboard. 70. CONSTRUCTION NOISE: Between the hours of 8:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m., weekdays and 9:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. weekends and holidays, construction, alteration or repair activities shall be allowed. No individual piece of equipment shall produce a noise level exceeding eighty-five 85) dBA at twenty-five (25) feet. If the device is located within a structure on the property, the measurement shall be made at distances as close to twenty-five (25) feet from the device as possible. The noise level at any point outside of the property plane shall not exceed eighty-five (85) dBA. 71. CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT PLAN: The Applicant shall submit a construction management plan that shall incorporate at a minimum the Earth Movement Plan, Traffic Control Plan, Project Schedule, site security fencing, employee parking, construction staging area, construction trailer, and proposed outhouse locations. 72. WVSD (West Valley Sanitation District): Sanitary sewer laterals are televised by West Valley Sanitation District and approved by the Town of Los Gatos before they are used or reused. Sanitary Sewer Clean -out is required for each property at the property line or location specify by the Town. 73. SANITARY SEWER BACKWATER VALVE: Drainage piping serving fixtures which have flood level rims less than twelve (12) inches (304.8 mm) above the elevation of the next upstream manhole and/or flushing inlet cover at the public or private sewer system serving such drainage piping shall be protected from backflow of sewage by installing an approved type backwater valve. Fixtures above such elevation shall not discharge through the backwater valve, unless first approved by the Administrative. The Town shall not incur any liability or responsibility for damage resulting from a sewer overflow where the property owner or other person has failed to install a backwater valve as defined in the Uniform Plumbing Code adopted by the Town and maintain such device in a functional operation condition. Evidence of West Sanitation District's decision on whether a backwater device is needed shall be provided prior to issuance of a building permit. 74. BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES (BMP's): Best Management Practices (BMPs) shall be maintained and be placed for all areas that have been graded or disturbed and for all material, equipment and/or operations that need protection. Removal of BMPs (temporary removal during construction activities) shall be placed at the end of each working day. 75. STORMWATER DEVELOPMENT RUNOFF: All new development and redevelopment projects subject to the stormwater development runoff requirements. Every applicant shall submit a stormwater control plan and implement conditions of approval that reduce stormwater pollutant discharges through the construction, operation and maintenance of treatment measures and other appropriate source control and site design measures. Increases in runoff volume and flows shall be managed in accordance with the development runoff requirements 76. SITE DESIGN MEASURES: All projects must incorporate the following measures to the maximum extent practicable: a. Protect sensitive areas and minimize changes to the natural topography. b. Minimize impervious surface areas. c. Direct roof downspouts to vegetated areas where feasible. d. Use permeable pavement surfaces where feasible. e. Use landscaping to treat stormwater. 77. DUST CONTROL: Blowing dust shall be reduced by timing construction activities so that paving and building construction begin as soon as possible after completion of grading, and by landscaping disturbed soils as soon as possible. Further, water trucks shall be present and in use at the construction site. All portions of the site subject to blowing dust shall be watered as often as deemed necessary by the Town, or a minimum of three times daily, or apply (non -toxic) soil stabilizers on all unpaved access roads, parking areas, and staging areas at construction sites in order to insure proper control of blowing dust for the duration of the project. Watering on public streets shall not occur. Streets will be cleaned by street sweepers or by hand as often as deemed necessary by the Town Engineer, or at least once a day. Watering associated with on -site construction activity shall take place between the hours of 8 a.m. and 5 p.m. and shall include at least one late -afternoon watering to minimize the effects of blowing dust. All public streets soiled or littered due to this construction activity shall be cleaned and swept on a daily basis during the workweek to the satisfaction of the Town. Demolition or earthwork activities shall be halted when wind speeds instantaneous gusts) exceed 25 MPH. All trucks hauling soil, sand, or other loose debris shall be covered. 78. CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES: All construction shall conform to the latest requirements of the CASQA Stormwater Best Management Practices Handbooks for Construction Activities and New Development and Redevelopment, the ABAG Manual of Standards for Erosion & Sediment Control Measures, the Town's grading and erosion control ordinance and other generally accepted engineering practices for erosion control as required by the Town Engineer when undertaking construction activities. 79. SITE DRAINAGE: Rainwater leaders shall be discharged to splash blocks. No through curb drains will be allowed. Any storm drain inlets (public or private) directly connected to public storm system shall be stenciled/signed with appropriate "NO DUMPING - Flows to Bay" NPDES required language. On -site drainage systems for all projects shall include one of the alternatives included in section C.3.i of the Municipal Regional NPDES Permit. These include storm water reuse via cisterns or rain barrels, directing runoff from impervious surfaces to vegetated areas and use of permeable surfaces. If dry wells are to be used they shall be placed 10' minimum from adjacent property line and/or right of way. 80. STORM WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN: A storm water management shall be included with the grading permit application for all Group 1 and Group 2 projects as defined in the amended provisions C.3 of the Municipal Regional Stormwater NPDES Permit, Order R2- 2009-074. The plan shall delineate source control measures and BMP's together with the sizing calculations. The plan shall be certified by a professional pre -qualified by the Town. In the event that storm water measures proposed on the Planning approval differ significantly from those certified on the Building/Grading Permit, the Town may require a modification of the Planning approval prior to release of the Building Permit. The applicant may elect to have the Planning submittal certified to avoid this possibility. 81. AGREEMENT FOR STORMWATER BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE OBLIGATIONS: The property owner shall enter into an agreement with the Town for maintenance of the stormwater filtration devices required to be installed on this project by Town's Stormwater Discharge Permit and all current amendments or modifications. The agreement will specify that certain routine maintenance shall be performed by the property owner and will specify device maintenance reporting requirements. The agreement will also specify routine inspection requirements, permits and payment of fees. The agreement shall be recorded prior to release of any occupancy permits. 82. SILT AND MUD IN PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY: It is the responsibility of contractor and home owner to make sure that all dirt tracked into the public right-of-way is cleaned up on a daily basis. Mud, silt, concrete and other construction debris SHALL NOT be washed into the Town's storm drains. 83. GOOD HOUSEKEEPING: Good housekeeping practices shall be observed at all times during the course of construction. Superintendence of construction shall be diligently performed by a person or persons authorized to do so at all times during working hours. The storing of goods and/or materials on the sidewalk and/or the street will not be allowed unless a special permit is issued by the Engineering Division. The adjacent public right-of-way shall be kept clear of all job related dirt and debris at the end of the day. Dirt and debris shall not be washed into storm drainage facilities. The storing of goods and materials on the sidewalk and/or the street will not be allowed unless a special permit is issued. The developer's representative in charge shall be at the job site during all working hours. Failure to maintain the public right-of-way according to this condition may result in the Town performing the required maintenance at the developer's expense. 84. NEIGHBORHOOD CONSTRUCTION COMMUNICATION PLAN: The applicant shall initiate a weekly neighborhood e-mail notification program to provide project status updates. The e-mail notices will also be posted on a bulletin board placed in a prominent location along the project perimeter. 85. PERMIT ISSUANCE: Permits for each phase; reclamation, landscape, and grading, shall be issued simultaneously. 86. COVERED TRUCKS: All trucks transporting materials to and from the site shall be covered. 87. FUTURE STUDIES: Any post project traffic or parking counts, or other studies.imposed by Planning Commission or Town Council shall be funded by the applicant. TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE SANTA CLARA COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT: 88. FIRE APPARATUS (ENGINE) ACCESS ROADS REQUIRED: Provide access roadways with a paved all weather surface, a minimum unobstructed width of 20 feet, vertical clearance of 13 feet 6 inches, minimum circulating turning radius of 36 feet outside and 23 feet inside, and a maximum slope of 15%. For installation guidelines refer to Fire Department Standards Details and Specifications sheet A-1. 89. FIRE LANE MARKING REQUIRED: Provide marking for all roadways within the project. Markings shall be per fire department specifications. Installations shall also conform to Local Government Standards and Fire Department Standard Details and SpecificationsA-6. 90. FIRE SPRINKLERS REQUIRED: Approved automatic sprinkler systems in new buildings and existing buildings and structures shall be provided in the locations described in this Section or in Sections 903.2.1 through 9032.18 whichever is the more restrictive. For the purposed of this Section, firewalls used to separate building areas shall be constructed in accordance with the California building Code and shall be without openings or penetrations. An automatic fire sprinkler system shall be provided throughout all new buildings and structures. Exception: Group A, B, E, F, I, L, M, S and U occupancy buildings and structures that do not exceed 1,000 square feet of building area and that are not located in the Wild land -Urban Interface Fire Area. Where provisions of this code require that a building or portion thereof be equipped throughout with an automatic sprinkler system in accordance with this section, the sprinklers shall be installed throughout in accordance with NFPA 13 except as provided in Section 903.3.1.1.1 and local standards. For new buildings having no designated use or tenant, the minimum sprinkler design density shall be Ordinary Hazard Group 2. 912.2 Location. With respect to hydrants, driveways, buildings and landscaping, fire department connections shall be so located that fire apparatus and hose connected to supply the system will not obstruct access to the building for other fire apparatus. The location of fire department connections shall be approved by the fire code official. A State of California licensed (C-16) Fire Protection Contractor shall submit plans, calculations, a completed permit application and appropriate fees to the fire department for review and approval prior to beginning their work. 91. POTABLE WATER SUPPLIES: Potable water supplies shall be protected from contamination caused by fire protection water supplies. It is the responsibility of the applicant and any contractors and subcontractors to contact the water purveyor supplying the site of such project, and to comply with the requirements of that purveyor. Such requirements shall be incorporated into the design and any water -based fire protection systems, and/or fire suppression water supply systems or storage containers that may be physically connected in any manner to an appliance capable of causing contamination of the potable water supply of the purveyor of record. Final approval of the system(s) under consideration will not be granted by this office until compliance with the requirements of the water purveyor of record are documented by that purveyor as having been met by the applicant(s). 92. PRIVATE ON -SITE STANDPIPE REQUIRED: Provide one private on -site standpipe installed at a location to be determined by the Fire Department, with a minimum acceptable flow of 1,000 GPM at 20 psi residual pressure. Prior to design, the project civil engineer shall meet with the fire department water supply officer to jointly spot the required fire hydrant locations. 93. EMERGENCY GATE/ACCESS GATE REQUIREMENTS: Gate installations shall conform with Fire Department Standards Details and Specification G-1 and, when opened shall not obstruct any portion of the required width for emergency access roadways or driveways. Locks, if provided, shall be fire department approved prior to installation. Gates across the emergency access roadways shall be equipped with an approved access device. If the gates are operated electrically, an approved Knox key switch shall be installed; if they are operated manually, then approved Knox padlock shall be installed. Gates providing access from a road to a driveway or other roadway shall be at least 30 feet from the road being exited. 94. CONSTRUCTION SITE FIRE SAFETY: All construction sites must comply with applicable provisions of the CFC Chapter 14 and the Fire Department's Standards Detail and Specification SI-7. 95. PREMISES IDENTIFICATION: approved numbers or addresses shall be placed on all new and existing buildings in such a position as to be plainly visible and legible from the street or road fronting the property. Numbers shall contrast with their background. 96. ACCESS TO BUILDINGS/LANDSCAPING REQUIREMENTS: Landscaping shall not obstruct Fire Department ladder access to buildings. The building permit submittal shall include a landscape drawing which reflects the location of all landscaping, to include how Fire Department ladder access will be provided around all buildings. Ground -ladder rescue from second and third floor rooms shall be made possible for fire department operations. With the climbing angle of seventy five degrees maintained, an approximate walkway width along either side of the building shall be no less than seven feet clear. Landscaping shall not be allowed to interfere with the required access. An approved walkway shall be provided on all sides of the building(s) leading from the fire access roadway to the exterior openings of the building(s). 97. ROOF ACCESS: Provision shall be made to allow emergency responder access to all portions of the roof, as approved by the Fire Department. 98. EMERGENCY ACCESS KEY BOX REQUIRED: It is the Santa Clara County Fire Department's policy that a key box be required for buildings that are equipped with fire sprinklers and/or fire alarm systems. This policy will only help facilitate the quick response of emergency crews to the interior of a building. 99. TIMING OF REQUIRED WATER SUPPLY INSTALLATIONS: Installations of required fire service(s) and fire hydrant(s) shall be tested and accepted by the Fire Department, prior to the start of framing or delivery of bulk combustible materials. Building permit issuance may be withheld until required installations are completed, tested, and accepted. 100. TIMING OF REQUIRED ROADWAY INSTALLATIONS: Required access roads, up through first lift of asphalt, shall be installed and accepted by the Fire Department prior to the start of combustible construction. During construction, emergency access roads shall be maintained clear and unimpeded. Note that building permit issuance may be withheld until installations are completed. Temporary access roads may be approved on a case by case basis. 101. FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS IN PRIVATE SCHOOLS: An automatic fire alarm system shall be provided in new buildings of private schools. Exception: Automatic detection devices are not required where an approved automatic sprinkler system is installed in accordance with (CFC) Section 903.3.1.1 and the occupant notification appliances will activate on sprinkler water flow and manual activation is provided from a normally occupied location. Required as a Mitigation Measure. N:\DEV\CONDITNS\2013\Bean2l9.docx MITIGATION MONITORING PLAN DATE: March 13, 2013 PROJECT: 219 Bean Avenue/PD- 1 1-006/ND- 1 1-008/S-12-098 Miti ation AIR QUALITY Basic Construction Measures. To limit the project's construction -related dust and criteria pollutant emissions, the following BAAQMD-recommended Basic Construction Mitigation Measures shall be included in the project's grading plan, building plans, and contract specifications: a. All exposed surfaces (e.g., parking areas, staging areas, soil piles, graded areas, and unpaved access roads) shall be watered two times per day. b. All haul trucks transporting soil, sand, or other loose material off -site shall be covered. c. All visible mud or dirt track -out onto adjacent public roads shall be removed using wet power vacuum street sweepers at least once per day. The use of dry power sweeping is prohibited. d. All vehicle speeds on unpaved roads shall be limited to 15 mph. e. All roadways, driveways, and sidewalks to be paved shall be completed as soon as possible. f. Idling times shall be minimized either by shutting equipment off when not in use or reducing the maximum idling time to five minutes (as required by the California airborne toxics control measure Title 13, Section 2485 of California Code of Regulations [CCR]). Clear signage shall be provided for construction workers at all access points. g. All construction equipment shall be maintained and properly tuned in accordance with manufacturer's specifications. All equipment shall 221 Monitoring Responsibility TimingAction Required as a Director of During condition of Community construction approval. Development — Building Division MITIGATION MONITORING PLAN DATE: March 13, 2013 PROJECT: 219 Bean Avenue/PD-1 1-006/ND-1 1-008/S-12-098 Mitigation be checked by a certified mechanic and determined to be running in proper condition prior to operation. h. Post a publicly visible sign with the telephone number and person to contact at the Town regarding dust complaints. This person shall respond and take corrective action within 48 hours. The BAAQMD's phone number shall also be visible to ensure compliance with applicable regulations. CULTURAL RESOURCES Monitoring Action Alert Construction Personnel. Construction personnel Required as a involved with earthmoving shall be alerted to the condition of potential for the discovery of prehistoric materials and in particular, concentrations of historic artifacts. Prehistoric archaeological resources could include but not be limited to the following: darker than surrounding soils of a friable nature, concentrations of stone, bone or fresh water shellfish, artifacts of these materials, and evidence of fire ash, charcoal, fire altered earth or rock) and of course, burials, both human and animal. CULTURAL RESOURCES Halt of Construction If Archaeological Traces Are Encountered. In the event that archaeological traces are encountered, all construction within a 20-foot radius of the find shall be halted, the Community Development Director shall be notified, and an archaeologist shall be approval. Required as a condition of approval. 2 Responsibility Director of Community Development Director of Community Development Timing During grading and construction During grading and construction MITIGATION MONITORING PLAN DATE: March 13, 2013 PROJECT: 219 Bean Avenue/PD-11-006/ND-11-008/S-12-098 Mitigation retained to examine the find and snake appropriate recommendations. CULTURAL RESOURCES Plan for Eligible Resources. In the event that it appears further earthmoving will affect a resource eligible for the California Register of Historic Resource (CRHR), a plan for evaluation of the resource through limited hand excavation should be submitted to the Town's Community Development Department for approval. If evaluative testing demonstrates that the project will affect a CRHR eligible resource, a plan for the mitigation of impacts to the resource should be submitted to the Community Development Department for approval before construction is allowed inside the zone designated as archaeologically sensitive. CULTURAL RESOURCES Preliminary Archaeological Report. If the Community Development Director finds that the archaeological find is not a significant resource, work will resume only after the submittal of a preliminary archaeological report and after provisions for reburial and ongoing monitoring are accepted. Provisions for identifying descendants of a deceased Native American and for reburial will follow the protocol set forth in CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5(e). If the site is found to be a significant archaeological site, a mitigation program will be prepared Monitoring Responsibility TimingAction Required as a Director of condition of Community During grading approval. Development and construction Required as a Director of During grading condition of Community and construction approval. Development I MITIGATION MONITORING PLAN DATE: March 13, 2013 PROJECT: 219 Bean Avenue/PD-1 1-006/ND-1 1-008/S-12-098 Miti agtion and submitted to the Community Development Director for consideration and approval, in conformance with the protocol set forth in Public Resources Code Section 21083.2. CULTURAL RESOURCES Final Archaeological Report. A final report shall be prepared when a find is determined to be a significant archaeological site, and/or when Native American remains are found on the site. The final report will include background information on the completed work, a description and list of identified resources, the disposition and curation of these resources, any testing, other recovered information, and conclusions. HAZARDS Abatement of Lead -Based Paints. Prior to proposed building demolition, construction finish materials that are suspect for containing lead -based paint will be tested, and pending laboratory analysis, will not be subjected to any process which renders them friable unless proper engineering controls and worker protection procedures are initiated. NOISE Monitoring Action Required as a condition of approval. Required as a condition of approval. Noise Barrier. To reduce excess noise from the playfield Required as a activity at the residence at 30 Tait Avenue, the project condition of 4 Responsibility Director of Community Development Director of Community Development — Planning and Building Divisions Director of Community Timing During grading and construction Prior to building demolition The applicant shall submit MITIGATION MONITORING PLAN DATE: March 13, 2013 PROJECT: 219 Bean Avenue/PD-1 1-006/ND-1 1-008/S-12-098 Miti a tion applicant will construct a six-foot high solid board fence along the property line between the playfield and the home at 30 Tait Avenue. The barrier height is in reference to the nearest playfield ground elevation. Figure 3 of Attached 5 of the Initial Study delineates the location of the noise control barrier. The fence will be constructed of minimum 1-inch thick (nom.) redwood boards nailed tight such that no gaps are visible. Cracks, gaps, knotholes are no permitted. No openings are permitted between the upper fence components and the ground. NOISE Recommended Construction Measures. Although there would be no significant noise impact under CEQA or construction -related noise mitigation required under CEQA, project -related demolition and construction noise at the site could be reduced by using quiet or "new technology" equipment. The greatest potential for noise abatement of current equipment should be the quieting of exhaust noise by use of improved mufflers. It is recommended that all internal combustion engines used at the project site be equipped with a type of muffler recommended by the vehicle manufacturer. In addition, all equipment should be in good mechanical condition so as to minimize noise created by faulty or poorly maintained engine, drive -train and other components. Demolition and construction noise could also be Monitoring Responsibility TimingAction approval. Development — building permits Building Division for the noise barrier within one month of approval of the Conditional Use Permit. The applicant shall complete construction of the noise barrier within six months of the Conditional Use Permit. Required as a Director of During condition of Community Construction. approval. Development — Building Division 5 MITIGATION MONITORING PLAN DATE: March 13, 2013 PROJECT: 219 Bean Avenue/PD-1 1-006/ND-1 1-008/S-12-098 Monitoring Mitigation Responsibility Timing Action mitigated by the following: Schedule construction operations that comply with the limits of the Town of Los Gatos Noise Ordinance. Limit the use of equipment close to sensitive receptor properties. Utilizing temporary berms or noise barriers, such as lumber or other material stockpiles and the construction trailers or other non -noisy long-term structures. Place long-term stationary equipment as far away from the residential areas as possible. Keep mobile equipment (haul trucks, concrete trucks, etc.) off of local streets as much as possible. A noise reduction benefit can also be achieved by appropriate selection of equipment utilized for various operations, subject to equipment availability and cost considerations, the following recommendations for minimizing impacts on the surrounding area are offered: Earth Removal: Use scrapers as much as possible for earth removal, rather than the noisier loaders and hauling trucks. Ground Preparation: Use a motor grader rather than a bulldozer for final grading. Building Construction: Power saws should be shielded or enclosed where practical to decrease noise emissions. Nail guns should be used where possible as they are less noisy than manual hammering. 6 MITIGATION MONITORING PLAN DATE: March 13, 2013 PROJECT: 219 Bean Avenue/PD-11-006/ND-11-008/S-12-098 Mitigation Generators and Compressors: Use generators and compressors that are housed in acoustical enclosures rather than weather enclosures or none at all. N:\DEVUENNWER S\Envirottmental Revic%v\MitigationMonitoringPlan\Bean219.docx Monitoring Responsibility TimingAction jt. Marys Church January 14, 2013 Ms. Jennifer Savage RECEIVED TOWN OF LOS GATOS Community Development Department / Planning Division JAI 15 2013 110 E. Main Street Los Gatos, CA 95030 TOWN OF LOS GATOS PLANNING DIVISION RE: St. Mary's Church and School Application for PD Zoning/Lot Line Combination & Architectural Design Review 219 Bean Avenue & 59 Victory Lane Dear Ms. Savage: Attached is our application for the creation of a Planned Development (PD) Zoning District for our various Parish properties in downtown Los Gatos. We have also included supporting documentation for a Lot Line Combination at 59 Victory Lane, Architectural Design Review for a new 2-story Jr. High School Building, and improvements to the existing 1-story `Grammar School' Building. We also seek to update parking/staff/student quotas limited by our current Conditional Use Permit issued in 1985 to reflect our current operations. We thank Town staff for all of the help over the years providing positive guidance and feedback on our various developments and improvements. HISTORY St. Mary's was originally established in Los Gatos as a mission on Santa Cruz Avenue between Main Street and Bean Avenue. In 1912, the small hall used as the church was moved to the corner of Bean and Tait, and St. Mary's was established as a parish in its present location. Two years later the first permanent rectory was built on parish property, and the current church was built in 1962. The school was opened in 1954 and has provided a solid academic education for thousands of students in our community. In 1985, a Conditional Use Permit was issued to St. Mary's Church and School when Lyndon Avenue was converted into a cul de sac, and St. Mary's built its Pastoral Center which includes a multi -purpose room, administrative center, and school and ministry offices. All of the conditions for the approval and guaranteed improvements were made as outlined in Resolution 1985-47. Note that this document references our `baseline' approvals: CUP U-84-17, A&SA S-84-60, and Subdivision Application M-84-21 respectively). We have also used the 59 Victory Lane Building as our Library, Science Lab, 8` h grade, Spanish Art classes for many years as part of our overall school operations. During the past 26 years, the church and school have experienced leadership changes of executive staff (pastor and 219 Bean Avenue Los Gatos, California 95030 408.354.3726 fax 408.354.9302 EXHIB6T 6 principal), administrative staff, and volunteer leadership in the parish. Consequently, current management of the church and school were unaware of the existence of the Conditional Use Permit and its restrictions. Once the CUP was called to our attention, we proceeded to gather information to file the application for updating the CUP. PD ZONING / DEVELOPMENT AREA We seek to replace severely aging and outdated facilities to ensure we can deliver a quality education product in modern facilities. The construction of a two story classroom/library building at our eastern property line will allow us to use our current facilities during construction without the use of temporary trailers or rental facilities. Once completed, the demolition of 59 Victory Lane will then allow for replacement of parking/play area. Our existing early 1950's era `Grammar School' is also in need of major restoration and much needed expansion. We seek to create a more distinct Kindergarten area and provide plumbing facilities at each classroom. Complete renovation of the aged restroom facilities would provide compliance with disabled access requirements. The Parish also seeks to retain the option for demolition our existing `Teen Center'. The one- story building on the northeast corner of our campus is approximately 1,000 square feet. It is an aging building that we have used primarily for child care or teen activities for the past few years. In 2009, we received approval from the Town to replace it with a two-story single family home of approximately 3,000-square-feet to serve as the future rectory, the home of the priests who live on campus and serve our parish community. We have attached the future rectory plans for your reference only. Because these plans were completed prior to the design of the new Junior High School building, some modifications to the future rectory plans would be needed to coordinate with the new campus plan. We believe these changes and modifications could be done in the future. Currently the priests reside in a two-story building just east of the church that is also used for parish offices, meeting space and storage. At the existing rectory, 3,035 square feet are used for the priests' residences and 1,085 square feet are used for parish offices, meeting space, and storage. Following construction of the future rectory, the entire existing rectory will be converted to parish office and administrative use. The existing Administrative Building will continue to be used for both school and parish administrative uses. CUP MODIFICATIONS We seek as part of the PD Zoning Process to modify our Conditional Use Permit that describes the level of activity at the church and school that has existed for many years: Condition 13 / Part 1: Student Enrollment in St. Mary's School St. Mary's School has been in operation since 1954, and its enrollment has fluctuated according to population trends and the desire of parents to provide their children with values -based education. Enrollment was at more than 400 in the 1960s when the large Baby Boom generation page 2 overflowed every classroom (private and public). At that time, as many as 50 students were assigned to each of St. Mary's classrooms. When the original Conditional Use Permit was issued in 1985, population trends had changed and there were many fewer students to be accommodated in elementary schools. The student population at that time was 265 students in grades 1-8. Now, the population of school -age children has increased once again and St. Mary's School currently serves 296 students in grades 1-8. In 1999, a local private preschool/kindergarten closed and St. Mary's School added a kindergarten class to help fill this educational void. Public school classrooms in Los Gatos were also filled to overflowing.] St. Mary's added a 35- student kindergarten program in academic year 1999-2000, bringing the total number of current students to 315. We request to update the maximum student enrollment to 315 children. There are no plans to increase student enrollment now or in the future as our facilities will not support them (9 Classrooms x 35 Students/Room = 315 Students) Condition 2 / Part 2• Number of Employees at St. Marys Church & School The existing CUP states that 20 employees are expected to work at the site. It does not mention how many volunteers routinely worked at the church and school, but we know there were many. We have seen a significant change in the way work is accomplished in churches of all denominations, in all parts of the country. The amount of work has not necessarily increased, but churches are less reliant on volunteers and more dependent on paid staff. Consequently, the number of people working in the office is about the same, but their status has changed from volunteer to employee. When all programs are operating fully St. Mary's Church employs 8 full- time staff and 5 part-time staff (equaling 2.1 FTE). St. Mary's School is a nine -months -a -year operation. It does not offer summer school. The school currently employees 15 full-time staff and 25 part-time staff (equaling 10.6 FTE) One FTE is equal to 40 hours per week. We request that the Conditional Use Permit for St. Mary's Church and School be updated to reflect the 35.7 FTE employees who work here. For parking purposes we will use 36. As demographics and the economy fluctuate, there may be the need in the future for St. Mary's to increase the number of employees as the number of volunteers decreases. Parking Related Information Currently there are a total of 105 parking spaces on the St. Mary's property. There are 72 marked spaces, 3 spaces in the garage, plus room for an additional 30 cars in unmarked spaces in the children's "play area" at the center of campus. In addition, the current 59 Victory Lane property has one on -site parking space and six off -site parking credits. We will continue to provide the one (1) on -site parking space as required for the Downtown Parking district. The existing CUP recognizes the 105 parking spaces as an approved, nonconforming situation, and allows nonconforming church uses to continue interminably. There has been no change to the number of seats in the church (654). We believe there is more than sufficient space to handle parking of employees for both the school and church on a daily operational basis. page 3 In years past, a discussion between a school representative and the Town traffic engineer, it was related by the traffic engineer that the change in the number of employees calculates to fewer than 20 trips and, as a result, does not require a traffic study. When school is not in session, such as during weekend masses or evening religious activities, the blacktop playground is used for parking, bringing the total on -site parking capacity to approximately 105. This parking is self -directed. Our required vehicular access to Victory Lane will be maintained in the proposed work. An ongoing communications program works to educate the parish community about parking options on the St. Mary's property and in adjacent public lots via flyers, bulletin, website www.stmaryslg.org), meetings such as State of the School and asking school families to ride share. [See attached flyers, webpage and bulletin articles as examples.] Continuing efforts are made to remind parishioners and their guests to be sensitive to the needs and concerns of other residents of the St. Mary's neighborhood. HOURS OF OPERATION 7:30 a.m. to 9:30 p.m., seven days a week. On rare occasions, there will be a need to have a religious service during other hours. For example, after the September I Ith tragedy, some people needed to find comfort with private prayer in the church. There was no formal mass, but the church was opened to the community during other hours. COMMUNITY USE OF FACILITIES In the past, the Town has requested that St. Mary's list the community groups (not affiliated with our religious activities) that use our facilities. These include: Almond Grove Neighborhood Watch meeting(s) Almond Grove Neighborhood Annual Block Party American Red Cross — six times per year, during the day (Blood Drive) Los Gatos Rotary Club — annual event (Crab Feed) Los Gatos Lions — annual event (Cioppino Feed) Handicapables — annual event ICF Polenta Dinner/Dance — twice per year YMCA — annual event (Father Daughter Dance) Country Fair — As you know, the parish also organizes our annual Country Fair one weekend in October. This is an event that is open to the public. The activities of St. Mary's church and school are community benefits. In fact, that is all that we do at St. Mary's — provide our parishioners and the community -at -large with religious programs and services that they desire. On average, the community uses the church and school facilities approximately 13 days per calendar year. As was stated in the original Conditional Use Permit issued by the Town, St. Mary's is "in harmony with the various elements and objectives of the General Plan and the Zoning page 4 Ordinance, because a church is allowed in any zone and this church was there before the Town was incorporated." ARCHITECTURE AND SITE APPLICATION: New Junior High School Building and Lower School Renovation With this application we are requesting Architecture and Site review for the new Junior High School building and for renovations to the existing Lower School building. The scope of work consists of the following: Construction of a new, approximately 13,500 square foot classroom building on the existing campus of St. Mary's parish and school. The building consists of general education classrooms, a breakout room, a science lab, and art classroom, a library and related office spaces. The building is two stories above grade with a standard concrete spread footing foundation system and wood frame construction. The building is occupancy type E, construction type V-B. The building will be equipped throughout with an automatic fire sprinkler system and fire alarm. Partial demolition of one classroom in the existing Lower School building to create a new walkway. No new square footage is added. Demolition of existing one story building at 59 Victory Lane and lot line combination. Construction of a new, approximately 3,000 square foot covered eating area. Site utilities, pedestrian walkways and concrete flatwork to support new development. The site work includes a new masonry wall along the South and East property lines. The wall ranges in height from 6'-0" to 8'-0." The height is needed to maintain security and privacy near the school area of the parish campus. As you know, our kinder playground is adjacent to a public parking lot. The variation in height is due to the existing slope of the site, especially along Victory Lane. We are not requesting Architecture and Site review at this time for the proposed future church - related residential structure or for the addition to the existing Lower School building. SUMMARY We are not requesting an expansion of our property boundaries on increase in number seats in the church, but we do need to replace and update our aging school buildings with modern facilities. We also seek to update our CUP to reflect what currently exists: o Change the number of students in St. Mary's School from 265 to 315 o Change the number of employees for St. Mary's Church and School from 20 to 35.7 FTE employees who work there and reflect the current level of religious programs and activities underway at St. Mary's Church and School that benefit the entire community We believe there is sufficient on -site parking for the number of students and employees, according to the standard school parking formula used by the Town to handle our normal operations. page 5 As you can see we, have much to accomplish. If you may remember, we had a successful review and construction project for our After -School Care Room in 2009. We worked with the community and Town Staff to mitigate any concerns. The result has been a success for the Parish and Neighborhood. We look forward to meeting with you as soon as you have completed your 30-day Review. Please let us know if there is additional background or detail needed for your review and we will work to provide as diligently as possible. Cordially, Rev. Rick Rodoni Pastor, St. Mary's Parish & School Cc: Sr. Nicki Thomas, Principal, SMS Jeffrey T. Berg, AIA / Steinberg Architects Mr. Ian Abell, Diocese of San Jose Ms. Teri Tucci, SMP Attachment 1: Additional Background: St. Mary's Parish statistics Attachment 2: Parking Flyer, Webpage, Bulletin Articles Attachment 3: Future Rectory Drawings page 6 f Attachment 1: ADDITIONAL BACKGROUND We thought it might be helpful to provide some statistics on the growth of the St. Mary's community in the past 27 years. If you would prefer to see year -by -year statistics, please let us know. 1985 1990 1995 2002 2006 2010 Number of 183 194 207 198 212 194 families with is for children at St. 1989, the Mary's School first year info available] Number of students at St. Mary's School 236 262 280 280 280 290 in grades 1-8 Number of Kindergart Kindergart Kindergart 35 students at St. en classes en classes en classes 60% are 35 35 Mary's School in not offered not not siblings) Kindergarten until1999 offered offered until1999 until1999 Number of families 1450 1532 1648 2290 2496 2082 registered as members of St. Mary's Church Average 1581 1351 1614 1752 1445 1373 attendance by per per per per individuals at weekend weekend weekend weekend weekend masses Number of 5 5 5 5 5 5 weekend masses Number of 65 62 65 34 16 15 page 7 weddings at St. Mary's Number of 44 41 38 35 40 19 funerals is for at St. Mary's 1986, the first year info is available] Number of baptisms 93 127 168 191 71 131 at St. Mary's page 8 Be K"irrcC to Our Neighbors Please remember f to use the ciesignated parLnSareas (noted 6elow)whiie at St_ Marys. Partin is also available alon bean Avenue (on the 5t. Mari) s side) . Thankyou_ Additional downtown Parkin areas are noted on the reverse side. ST. AiARY COUNTRY FAiip,, ARKING , As we know, parking is an issue in our neighbor- hood. In an effort to alleviate this problem here are some things You can do: C ar ool whenever possiblep k1ways attempt to use the towns public parking lots first (see map on back d emember, -you can have someone crop you off and pick you up T UP n'loY a walk, ride -your bike(s), rollerblade, run, etc . to the Country Fair ST. MARY'S CHURCH LOS GATOS Mass Intentions for the Week Monday, Aug. 21 7:30am Ruth Borre + Tuesday, Aug. 22 7:30am Dr. Ed Marcuz + Wednesday, Aug. 23 7:30am Harold Johnson + Thursday, Aug. 24 7:30am Denes Kassai + Friday, Aug. 25 7:30am Ann Longo + Saturday, Aug. 26 7:30am Francis Hayes + 5:00pm Ted Hettel + Sunday, Aug. 27 7:30 am Arline Petersen + 9:00 am Fred Callis + 11:15 am Kathryn Blanchard + 6:00 pm Parishioners Please place this week's Scripture Readings Aug. 13th) in this box. Thanks'. Be kind to our neighbors ... In our bulletin on July 31st we inserted a flyer suggesting available parking areas when coming to St. Mary's for mass or any other event here. If you missed the flyer you can find the information on our website: www.churchrei!istry.com/smi - If you have any questions or concerns about parking, please contact Teri Tucci at 354-3726 ext. 37. REPORT ON COLLECTIONS FOR 8/13/2000 Actual: $14,920.53 YTD: $71,684.53 Goal: $16,176.50 YTD: $69,373.14 Variance: $ 1,255.97 YTD: $ 2,311.39 REMINDER AUGUST 15 is the feast of the Assumption of the Blessed Virgin Mary. It is a fact that some of the Holy Days have been moved to the next Sunday or are not celebrated. However, the Assumption is still considered as a Holy Day of Obligation. Mass will be celebrated at 7:30 a.m. and 7:30 p.m. ATTENTION LECTORS & EUCHARISTIC MINISTERS: We will begin processing the schedule for Oct. -Dec. the last week of August. Contact us at (408) 354-4061 ext. 35 with any necessary "change of status" for inclusion in this schedule. Please check the vestibule of the church for retreat information from the various retreat centers located within our diocese. REGISTRATION INFORMATION If you have recently started attending our parish or have been attending but have never registered, please come by the parish office OR pick up a registration form in the Vestibule. Registering in the parish benefits all of us. We begin to know who you are and you receive general parish mailings and Sunday envelopes. Without specific use of envelopes, it is impossible for us to keep track of any donations you make to the Church. Don't procrastinate. Register today! ATTENTION THE ABATEMENT PROCESS HAS BEGUN IN THE BELL TOWER AND REAR CONFESSIONAL. WE WILL BE CONTINUING WITH THIS PROCESS BEGINNING THIS WEEK. THANK YOU FOR YOUR PATIENCE AS THE CHURCH UNDERGOES THIS CONSTRUCTION PROJECT. ST. MARY'S CHURCH LOS GATOS Mass Intentions for the Week Monday, October 2 7:30am Linnet Loiseau + Tuesday, October 3 7:30arn Eduardo San Juan + Wednesday, October 4 7:30am Marge Goldstrom Margaret Bernardo,,,. 9:00 am Anna Michalski Thursday, October 5 7:30am Antonio Alvemaz + Friday, October 6 Alice Winter & Helen Marcotte + Saturday, October 7 7:30am Carmelites + 5:00pm Daoud S. Dinno + Sunday, October 8 7:30 am Dr. William Chaikin + 9:00 am Parishioners 11:15 am George Bemardo, ..* r., 6:00 pm Conti Luigia + Be kind to our neighbors ... Please make every effort to park in our parking lots and public parking lot #6 before parking in front of our neighbors' homes. To find out more about where you can park, you can find the information on our website: www.churchregist[y.com/smig. .com/smig. If you have any questions or concerns about parking, please contact Teri Tucci at 354-3726 ext. 37. SERRA CLUB OF SAN JOSE Almighty God, your son Jesus told us to pray for vocations since the harvest is great and the laborers are few. Help all of us who center our Catholic lives in word and sacrament to be active promoters of vocations to the priesthood and religious life. The ministry of identifying any nurturing vocations belongs to each member of each family in our parish family. May we all accept this mission from Jesus with the determination that comes from faith. REPORT ON COLLECTIONS FOR 9/17/2000 Actual: $16,398.50 YTD: $175,965.46 Goal: $16,17650 YTD: $194,118.50 Variance: $222.00 YTD: ($18,153.04) SPIRITUALLY ENHANCING OPPORTUNITIES Beyond Sunday The most recent "Beyond Sunday" newsletter was mailed to all registered parishioners last week. Additional copies of this newsletter can be found at exits of church and in parish offices. Please consider what activities you can participate in and send in the 'registration form' enclosed in the newsletter. All events are open to parishioners and their family and friends. All registrants will be placed on the 'attendees list' for the events with contact only if a particular session/series is 'full'. Check date and location for event, show up, and you will be expected! If you have questions call 354-406105. Small Christian Communities Several small faith sharing groups are willing and able to accept new members. Still considering being a part of a group? We'll find the group that meets your scheduling needs —call 354-406105. Diocese of San Jose Jubilee Celebration Don't forget to check out the information newspaper' at exits of the church on this special catechetical and liturgical event for all Catholics of the diocese on Oct. 28. Registration forms found in the newspaper -type brochure are to be sent directly to diocesan address listed. You will find a variety of topics and may chose the sessions you are most interested in attending. DATES & PLACES TO REMEMBER: September 28, 9:30am, Hofmann Center, "Women of Scripture" series began; October 18, 7:30pm, Hofinann Center, Forgiveness" series begins. Take Another Look Returning to active participation in the community? We offer all adult Catholics an opportunity to renew their understanding of the beliefs and practices of the Church today. You name the topics of interest, we provide the information. Call 354-4061 ext. 35 and a T.A.L. team member will contact you. ST. MARTS CHURCH LOS GATOS Mass Intentions for the Week Monday, November 27 7:30am Linda ZucchelIi + Tuesday, November 28 7:30am Peggy Best. Special Intention Wednesday, November 29 7:30am Peg Kennedy + Thursday, November 30 7:30am Helen Marcotte + Friday, December 1 7:30am Louise lorillo. Special lntmiton Saturday, December 2 7:30am Carmelites 5:00pm Antonio Alvernaz + Sunday, December 3 7:30 am Eduardo San Juan + 9:00 am Fred Callis + 11:15 am Beverly Antes + 6:00 pm Paul Macien + s Parishioners PARKING NOTICE New Time Restrictions and Sunday Enforcement Now lnEffect••00 As part of the Town of Los Gatos Holiday Parking program, new timed parking restrictions are in effect throughout the downtown area. Please carefully read the parking restrictions on the signs posted near the space each time you park your vehicle to avoid receiving a parking citation. For detailed information about the program and the various parking options available, you can pick up a copy of the 2000 Holiday Parking in Historic Downtown Los Gatos brochure from any merchant, Chamber of Commerce, Town Hall, at Lot 4 from the Valet Parking attendants, or from the driver of the free shuttle bus. SERRA CLUB OF SAN ,DOSE Parents, Encourage Your Children: To develop their talents and gifts, encourage them to think of Church ministry as a possible and viable life choice. REPORT ON COLLECTIONS FOR 11/19/2000 Actual: $16,405.00 YTD: 315,358.99 Goal: $16,17650 YTD: 323530.00 Variance: +228.50 YTD: 7,171.01) Schedule for Friday, December 8, 2000 Feast of the Immaculate Conception of Mary The church will be open from 6:30a.m. until 9:00p.m. on this day 7:30 am Mass 9:00 am Mass followed by a reception in Hofmann Center 11:30 am Exposition of the Blessed Sacrament 12:00 pm Mid -day prayer and benediction 3:30-4:30 pm -- Confession 7:30 pm Mass Rachel's Vineyard Retreat - December 8-10, 2000 Struggling with feelings of sadness or loss after abortion? Still seeking peace months or years after the choice? You are not alone. Join us December 8-10 in the Russian River Wine Country for a healing weekend retreat. Safe, supportive setting includes sharing, ritual, prayer, sacraments, and memorial service. Facilitated by a team of licensed therapists and others who have walked the journey from pain to healing. Cost is $125 (no one will be denied for financial reasons). Registration required by November 27. Call Family Life Office, Diocese of Oakland 925) 680-8510. Ask for Monika or call ext. 4 or obtain an information packet. All inquiries confidential. See also www. rachelsvineyard.ore. On Saturday, December 2nd, we will be decorating the church for the masses of the Advent Season. If you have an hour or two to spare anytime oo between 8:30 a.m. and 12:00 noon that 40 day, we would welcome your presence and any assistance you can offer. We will be hanging the Advent wreath and preparing a beautiful worship environment for our parish. We would be pleased to see you and 40eo grateful for any time that you could O spend with us. If you can join us, please call Marianne McGrath at 365-3706. We wish you a blessed and holy Advent. a Where to park at St. Mary's and surrounding downtown parking available in Los Gatos 0 r 111,40, ENTSERVICE C-1VTC1 L-&v rL p fit. Mart) d1urck 1 1m- Parking 11-LI-I_Ll 59 VICTORY BUILDING Blacktop Area Parking available except during school) ll Marq'S `+i;i1ool Lot 6 Parking available 119 Senn 4venua, Ina Gates, c'atf/a nlu 95010 408.354.3726 Online Giving Centennial Campaign Mass Times Contact Us i St. .A/,/ i ry of the t' Home About Us Sacraments & Worship Faith Formation Faith in Action Get Involved St. Mary's School Resources Search Site Directions and Parking Search About US Directions and Pa,!, i i I Share U Paaactiman 116 Pane a' r wardPa s Y A E Main st J m x9YN; 0201; GOO& - Map data 0201%Googb- View Larger Map 11 Late St. Mary of the Immaculate Conception - 219 Bean Avenue, Los Gatos, CA 408.354.3726 St. Mary School - 30 Lyndon, Los Gatos, CA 408.354.3944 Contact Us Search Site I Site Map I Login powered by eCatholic a division of WEBPRO PRODUCTIONS, LLC RCMPN c iwcwmraP+o GCN'fr`O(` 18z1 SMef FIB 1Lecl i'• M/'(' F iZl9t1 LOS-fob- vi 472wFit: 4cvs- ii4.3Tzlo Pr—M ZGN$: .1•D p Ta aj.COr c bs J < I p4'o GJWA--l7yf£ L1NN3 I iGro•S g uPsfra s uYI(+ ,21I.5 Tarim U%AWO tee. I M10 Fvrcµe--5 VW! IMPEKAOV9 h WWI- 1jj(o4fG DEaCRIPTION 4 PROJECT n". q.a rw m w aanoluen a a ca.+a. uu woa wlreas w ae aauuluwl a. amy w.w ianw Nxwo. AS pminea 0a4 atl Wwm.tian w.IonetlN m Uwsen;,awo caa.a aa..a.y.. z gpg LLJ LLJ wIS' moll 5 ii ass M n1i IN 11WY78Lj101( I LL PON 4 f I I • i "P Se i ai.a IV NEW-RE5ImOE....HOWLEY- HACG a.eJi AN AVENU5 STR5-_E.t S AP _..-._.lQ2KING SOUTH z'=1'a" N«._LO.GATION PL-AH 271. eeAN -' • --.-- .. ¢I01 WILOBR - --'"'---"" -1f WI106R -tW. MAN _. PLEA H FV N u E• 5T R.E E T 5GA rE LOo KING N 0 2TH FINISH NOTES FLOORSPlooi, lam1—j. um.dmal,..x.l Ilu.n ihru.ma. lyp., uro. Slain 1. Im,c co.lul rwin.r. CABINETS P.in, "..abm.m. lyp.. m.. HUNTER TOPS Gmna. dl. In kiud,.m. C.nmd. lim in bR:m. I IAIW%VAR' C.bi- :.il :,d•Ecihmivc. p--- g. d-n : uB r,,bbW W..e. by Emmk.r.yual. CEILINGS11r.ai& •Q0,tt B—d'.r pyl- board on -ili.ol .I-.6 I all a L..l xilinp. I'I. MBINO FIXTURESKAZ.r..., upp.,W.4, i. APPLIANCES GR.r Kklmnaid. Gax s.Wop wi,h.lalia—.1. NLf-lQLAToN Mhcp-RENT qzo=s R•I`T y,fu.s IK- I =r KL rc-MUUl1dFI,IF•w I-!E`L-T LPFiy LnflS • y TAN/olstrP^A 1 Y _ 1Wy W A..0 z W C^Mi3^+30.15 ei9r+F#1 •j'S%F h:10' S'!Rini 3'•19` I ¢' n•o' I,•, •" 1 ci=1.;P I G-iL]Z IYLLw.1J I _— 9PECIAI WTI TO OWNEN Zs•i IBi.I'MVL.'-'•l. Il_ STd n> a Gyx xuw www~max.. 1 F, 'TMN F.. 1'J=I'^4afv-Lc ffi'IEi. N:X/CE • - F+bRY r+rb WM..+IP.F"' /w0.1'µE'... ^- !!! w.^O,w'a.u"i. wrocnu" w. uiaa',w '.^ i ,' FMN F F I a- .1P++4k3o/+f" fYlJ • a.a..•c I..t , w it 144. Pwf eu,•. 'yci'we ins o - r,' g. F{f'1—vey4l. Ne .r.NC f,_a a ... 61 Tomin— C I I oq t5tv, 1.1w— k"Irr T. MR-41TWrIc aul 15, Ccw_Il CrA 021 -F Mll.d Coil xr IT ng 211 T;ZV FLOOF=415 R:.11 WA.Ls (GIB MI .I r'zm 7 HnF4VXorCm c=54w4r M-4 Ira, cl vvocp vvM$ 1 Gurlf, September 10, 2012 Ms. Jennifer Savage TOWN OF Los GATOS Community Development Department 110 E. Main Street Los Gatos, CA 95031 RE: St. Mary's Parish and School 219 Bean Avenue, Los Gatos, California SA Project No.: 10-108 / H1 Steinberg 60 Pierce Avenue San Jose, California 95110 www.Ste i n b e rg. US. com 1 Cl 2012 Planned Development Application PD-11-006 TOWN Oi` 1NegaveDeclarationOsGATOS Request for Additional Buildi0ng Height / Response to letter dated March 28, 2012, LANii!l1VG ®fV1SIpN Dear Jennifer: Please consider the additional responses in consideration for our request for additional building height as indicated on the Land Use Plan sheet A2.0. At the proposed new junior high school building, we are requesting a maximum allowable height of 36'-8" for the following functional and aesthetic reasons: Interior Ceiling Height: Additional interior wall and ceiling heights will provide more area for the display of teaching materials, exhibits and props, Aminimum 10'-0" high ceiling should be considered for these educational spaces, Also, a 10' ceiling is more proportional with the large classrooms and library. Structural / Mechanical interstitial space: We anticipate the second floor and roof framing structural systems to be approximately 2'-0" thick (TJI joists over glue - laminated beams). We also anticipate the space required to conceal mechanical ductwork, plumbing, and fire sprinkler utilities to be approximately 2'-0" thick. Therefore a 14'-0" floor -to -floor and floor -to -roof heights is necessary to maintain an interior ceiling height of 10'-0". 114' + 14' = 28'1. Sloped Roofs: Demolition of 59 Victory Lane will eliminate the only building on campus with a more industrial, commercial, 'flat -roof' appearance. We are sensitive to existing campus and neighborhood aesthetic and believe the additional building height will allow for a more expressive building form. Architecturally, the pitched roof mimics the pitched roof of the existing, adjacent Lower School Building, continuing the architectural character of the existing buildings on St. Mary's campus. Existing Grade: The natural grade of the site slopes downward from south to north thru the proposed building site. The finish floor of the new building will match the finish floor of the existing lower school building due to the close proximity to the existing structure. This natural slope combined with the connection of new and existing floor heights is increasing the overall proposed height. Mechanical Well: Additional overall building height will also allow for the incorporation of a sunken roof -top well for the buildings mechanical equipment. By incorporating a well into the overall building design and form, we can reduce the overall height of the necessary mechanical screening element. While the existingjunior high school building at 59 Victory Lane is fairly'low' at 16'-0" tall, we believe there is merit for additional height, The existing church is approximately 35'-0" high and the spire, approximately 50'-0". Other campus buildings such as the Rectory and Multi - Purpose buildings are in excess of 25'-0". Furthermore, the proposed building is more than 200'-0" back from Bean Avenue. As you know, the proposed site is along the service alley known as Victory Lane and will not create an undue burden or presence on the rear of these commercial buildings, However, we have stepped the second floor of the new building 'back' to mitigate any tall wall planes in excess of one-story in height, 415.683.2000 San Francisco 408.295.5446 San Jose 213.629.0500 Los Angeles 86.21.3368.6860 Shanghai EXHIBIT 7 September 10, 2012 Ms. Jennifer Savage Page 2 of 2 We look forward to your response and continuing our good working relationship. If you have any questions, I may be reached at 408-817-3176 or via e-mail at jberg@steinberg.us.com. Sincerely, STEI NBERG ARCHITECTS Jeffrey T. Berg, AIA Associate Principal Cc: Teri Shepherd Tucci, St. Mary's Parish Enclosures: 1. A4.1 Building Elevations & Sections showing neighboring structures 2. Aerial Photo 3. Photos along Victory Lane looking East and West jT ha s a ' ¢ is r o 0 ti y ri.:- • - ` 'P' 1' "' ~ ` `' gym r e r ri47F/ ` LIcleo 1A. Victory Lane - Looking West 1B. Victory Lane - Looking West Key Plan St. Marys School Steinberg Architects Victory Lane - West Los Gatos, California 2A. Victory Lane - Looking East I Y LGI It: - LUUKII Ig LdSl 2C. Victory Lane - Looking East Steinberg Architects St. Mary's School Los Gatos, California 2A 2C, Key Plan Victory Lane - East I A-) p BUILDING SECTION 5 SOUTH ELEVATION 4 MIA KEY NOTES C) Steinberg Architects AIM 5TWF-F ooG I-.- A- Q .row L ELEVATION 2 LAb I tLtVA I WIN! I it. Marys rarlsh And School Planned Development Zoning Application Building Section PD-11-006 A4.1 December 27, 2012 Ms. Jennifer Savage Community Development Department Town of Los Gatos 110 E. Main Street Los Gatos, CA 95031 PLANNING URBAN DESIGN RECEIVED TOWN OF LOS GATOS PLANNING DIVISION RE: 219 Bean Avenue Dear Jennifer: I reviewed the drawings, visited the site, prepared an initial review, and worked with staff and the applicant to refine the design. This letter summarizes the earlier issues and the applicant's responses to the recommendations. Neighborhood Context The site is occupied by a large complex of church and academic buildings surrounded by a traditional Los Gatos resi- dential neighborhood on three sides, and by the small scale North Santa Cruz Avenue business corridor on the fourth side. Photos of the site and surrounding neighborhood are shown below and on the following page. 700 LARKSPUR LANDING CIRCLE . SUITE 199 . LARKSPUR . CA . 94939 TEL: 415.331.3795 CDGPI_AN@RACBECXHI t •T n i P , i New Junior High site (left) and existing Lower School Building (right) Existing Multi -Purpose Building i` Existing After School Care Buildin; Traditional house across Bean Avenue 219 Bean Avenue Design Review Comments December 27, 2012 Page 2 Existing Church Existing Howley Hall Adjacent office structure on Bean Avenue Traditional house across Bean Avenue CANNON DESIGN GROUP 700 LARKSPUR LANDING CIRCLE . SUITE 199 . LARKSPUR . CA . 94939 319 Bean Avenue Design Review Comments December 27, 2013 Page 3 Concerns and Recommendations 1. %Vhen I conducted my site reconnaissance, I was fortunate to see the campus in full operation with students utilizing the large open paved space for recreation, and the parents later driving into the same paved open space to pick up their children. While this portion of the complex is rather barren, it is understandable given the many and varied de- mands on the open space. Still, given the visually harsh quality of this eastern portion of the complex, which is in strong contrast to the attention given to landscaping in the surrounding neighborhood, it seemed reasonable to ask the design team to look for additional opportunities to add trees and ground cover to the large expanses of paving. The existing and proposed planters at the base of buildings facing the main open space are good. In addition the applicant has added landscaped areas and trees in other locations as shown on the diagram below. The new gate and brick piers at the Bean Avenue auto entry will also much improve the visual appearance of the entry and parking area. New fence and gate are good Piers have been chanced to brick to matet CANNON DESIGN GROUP 700 LARKSPUR LANDING CIRCLE . SUITE 199 . LARKSPUR . CA . 94939 219 Bean Avenue Design Review Continents December 27, 2012 Page 4 2. The proposed renovation of the Lower School Building seems modest and straightforward. I have no comments or recommendations for changes to the design. 3. There were a number of issues with the proposed new Junior High School Building shown in the sketch below. M. 4' A.. kV s y i li lll lllf l't I Previously proposed new Junior High School Building Identified Issues: While the design was relatively simple, it seemed to draw its inspiration largely from the Lower School Building, and did not relate well to the other more substantial buildings on the campus or to the attention to detail seen in the surrounding neighborhood. The materials did little to mitigate the harshness of the very large asphalt paved areas addressed above. The east facade presented a tall stucco face to Victory Lane whereas the adjacent existing Lower School Build- ing has a low brick wall facing the lane. The recommendations for the Junior High School building were as listed, and shown on the diagram below. Face the first floor on all sides of the structure, including Victory Lane, with brick to relate to the brick on other buildings on the campus. Enhance the entries by providing a more distinctive window pattern and wall cap at the upper floor over the entries, and adding distinctive lighting adjacent to the entries. Provide a supporting beam expression at the second floor line. add additional landscaping near the building. Firm up the design at the edges to the north entry access ramp. Provide positive top cap to wall V Provide more contemporary window pattern to emphasize ST, t.IARY'S SCHOOL Provide a supporting beam expression r 1 'N Utilize brick on ground Il N - l^ floor including Victory It Lane frontage Add distinctive lights to Refinement is needed here to define pedestrian emphasize entries ramp edges and allow handrails (if required) Consider planter with integrated top for seating) Previous north elevation recommendations CANNON DESIGN GROUP 700 LARKSPUR LANDING CIRCLE . SUITE 199 . LARKSPUR . CA . 94939 219 Bean Avenue Design Review Comments December 27, 2012 Page 5 I feel that the applicant has responded well to the identified concerns, and I feel comfortable with the revised design as shown in the currently proposed elevation drawings below. Currently proposed north elevation Currently proposed west elevation Currently proposed Victory Lane elevation Note extent of existing brick along Victory Lane New Structure will be here Brick has been added to extend existing wall surface CANNON DESIGN GROUP 700 LARKSPUR LANDING CIRCLE . SUITE 199. LARKSPUR . CA. 94939 219 Bean Avenue Design Review Comments Dccembcr 27, 2012 Page 0 There was one additional issue involving both the site plan and the design of the new Junior High School structure, and that is the height of the new building. The desire to access the new building at the same level as the Lower School Building makes sense, and allows an easy flow of pedestrian traffic for all, including disabled students. Although I believe that the height would be acceptable since the building would be positioned facing onto the large open space, I did looked at potential alternatives to lowering the structure. However, I don't believe that there are any reasonable ones that could accomplish a significant height reduction without major impacts on the floor plan (e.g., absorbing some vertical circula- tion to the first floor within the structure at its south end), serious diminution of the design (e.g., utilizing all flat roofs), awkwardness in pedestrian flows (e.g., limiting disabled access to the structure to the north end of the new building), or substantial additional cost (e.g., regrading and repaving a major portion of the central open space). Each of these pos- sibilities could have potential consequences far more serious than the impact of the slight increase in extra height. Should this increase in height still remain an important issue for which the above identified examples seem undesir- able, it seems to me that the other alternatives that might be explored would revolve around a reduction in the floor -to - floor heights which could involve: Acceptance of a floor -to -ceiling height of less than ten feet on one or both levels. Using other mechanical systems or methods of delivering heated and cooled air to the spaces through a more complete integration of ducts with the floor, roof and wall structures that might require less depth within the dropped ceiling areas. Jennifer, please let me know if you have any questions, or if there are specific issues of concern that I did not address. Sincerely, CANNON DESIGN GROUP Larry L. Cannon CANNON DESIGN GROUP 700 LARKSPUR LANDING CIRCLE . SUITE 199 . LARKSPUR . CA . 94939 Deborah Ellis, MS Consulting Arborist & Horticulturisl Semice since 1984 Jennifer Savage Town of Los Gatos Community Development Department 1 10 E. Main Street i® Los Gatos, C A 95030 January 10, 2013 TOWN OF LOS GATOS PLANNING DIVISION 219 Bean Ave., St. Mary's Parish & School) Review of most recent construction plan set received December 4, 2012 relative to existing tree protection Dear Jennifer: I have reviewed the plans described above and have discussed the design of the proposed tree well around coast live oak #63 and the new planter around Japanese maple #61 so that I have no additional concerns about construction around these two trees. It does not appear that any additional trees will need to be removed on the site other than those mentioned in my report dated October 17, 2012. In my October review I requested that the architects develop a cross -sectional detail of the tree well that is proposed around the large coast live oak #63. They have indeed included a very nice detail of this work on Sheet L.2, Detail #2, Tree Well Section at Oak Tree #63. The architects has also clearly explained in writing, under the Tree Notes on this page, the special treatment that is needed around the large redwood tree #65 (existing pavement removal) and planting around #61 Japanese maple and #68 magnolia, as I had requested. Regarding the planting of trees in bio-retention areas: You asked me to answer the following questions: 1. Can you plant trees in the bio-retention pond? 2. If so, what species? Yes, you can plant trees in bio-retention ponds, but it is not always a good idea. Whether or not trees should be planted in a particular bio-retention area depends upon a number of factors such as: size of the bio-retention area, expected length of inundated periods, soil characteristics including drainage, how the bio-retention area is constructed and other factors. So there is no blanket answer to this question - it "depends" upon the particular project at hand. These factors would also play into appropriate species for the bio-retention area. Looking at your proposed bio-retention areas, I see that they are between 6 and 15 feet wide. I also reviewed the detail on sheet C2.0. This detail shows 18 inches of sandy loam planting soil over 6 PO Box 3714, 5aratoga, CA 95070. 408-725-1357. decah@pacbell.net, http://www,decah.com. Page 1 or 2 EXHIEUT 9 l Deborah Ellis, IIVIS Consulting Arborist & Horticulturist Service since 1984 inches of Class II permeable gravel, then a 4-inch diameter drain pipe with 6 inches of gravel underneath that. This is not a lot of soil depth for trees before you run into the drain pipe, so for this situation I do not recommend trees - I fear that their roots will clog the drain pipes too quickly. Therefore I recommend that you do not plant trees in this particular bio-retention area. I also looked over the plant species list for the bio-retention area and I have a few comments on that. I recommend keeping the Juncus patens 'Elk Blue', which is a great plant for your bio- retention area. It can withstand long periods of inundation as well as dry periods. The yellow -eyed grass is alright, but it should be planted closer to the top of the basin. I'm not optimistic about the Mohonias though; I think you should remove those from the potential plant list. They are riparian understory plants, but in my experience they do not fare well in saturated soil conditions. The Agaponthus seems out of place and also does not do well in inundated soils. Douglas iris will also not tolerate saturated soil conditions although this plant might do alright near the top of the basin. There are many native and non-native sedges (Corex species) available hat will perform their job better than the previous species. Sincerely, Deborah Ellis, MS. Consulting Arborist & Horticulturist Certified Professional Horticulturist #30022 ASCA Registered Consulting Arborist #305 I.S.A. Board Certified Master Arborist WE-457B PO Box 3714, 5aratoga, CA 95070. 408-725-1357. decch@pccbell.net. http://www.decah.com. Page 2 of 2 Jennifer Savage Town of Los Gatos, Community Development Dept. 110 E. Main Street Los Gatos, CA 95030 October 17, 2012 Deborah Ellis, MS Consulting Arborist & Horticulturis Service since 1984 RECEIVED C` T 18 2012 PONNING WN OF DIVgTpSSfpN 219 Bean Ave. (St. Mary's Parish & School), Arborist Review of plan set received September 29, 2012 Dear Jennifer: I have revised the Tree Tables in my previous Arborist Report for this project dated May 1, 2012. Changes or comments based upon the current plans that I just reviewed are included on the Updated, Abbreviated Tree Table beginning on the next page. The number of trees to remove has decreased from a potential 8 (#62,'63,'64, 65 68 and 81) to a definite 3 (#62, 64 and 81). Trees still listed as "Debatable" are #58, 59 and 69. The architects have been very cooperative and helpful regarding designing a tree well area around the large coast live oak tree #63, in order to save this tree. The design and construction of the improvements around this oak tree is going to be somewhat difficult, so I would like to see detail drawings of the area around the tree so that I am fully informed about the potential impact to the tree. Sincerely, 411. 49W,Z, Ltk-a- Deborah Ellis, MS. Consulting Arborist & Horticulturist Certified Professional Horticulturist #30022 ASCA Registered Consulting Arborist #305 I.S.A. Board Certified Master Arborist WE-457B PO Box 3714, Saratoga, CA 95070. 408-725-1357. decah@pacbell.net. http://www.decoh.com. St. Marys. Arborist Review of Plans received 10/17/2012. Page 1 of 4 Deborah Ellis, MS Consulting Arborist & Horticulturist Service since 1984 UPDATED, ABBREVIATED TREE TABLE TREE ROOTEE, PROTECTION Species TrunkExpected DISTANCES maCommonDiam. Size Preservation Suitability Value Construction Action ; Reason Notes Name @ 3 ft. o, w Impact m m U w o N O W l 55 Prunus 6 15'16 100 60 Fair/Good 1360 Moderate/Severe Save Construction: proposed water 1 2 3 caroliniana, line centerline 2.5 feet from Carolina laurel trunk. Move water line farther cherry from tree if possible. 1 56 Carolina laurel 5 14*9 80 60 Fair/Good 560 Moderate Save Construction: proposed water 1 2 3 cherry 1 1 line centerline 4 feet from trunk. 57 Carolina laurel 7 16`14 60 50 Fair/Poor 940 Low/Moderate Save Construction: proposed water 2 3 4 cherry 1 line centerline 8 feet from i1trunk. 58 Carolina laurel 4 13*9 50 40 Poor 360 Low/Moderate Debatable Condition Construction: proposed water 1 2 3 j cherry line centerline 6.5 feet from trunk. Condition: Extensive trunk I cankers. 59 Carolina laurel 7 16*14 50 50 Fair/Poor 850 Moderate Debatable Condition, Construction: water line/fire 2 3 3 cherry Construction service trenches are 4.5 feet from the trunk (this is centerline of water pipe), so trenching will be closer. Condition: large trunk canker. PO Box 3714, Saratoga, CA 95070. 408-725-1357. decah@pacbell.net, http://www.decah.com. St. Mary's. Arborist Review of Plans received 10/17/2012. Page 2 of 4 Deborah Ellis, MS Consulting Arborist & Horticulturis' J41c, TREE ROOT CONDITION PROTECTION Species Trunk Expected DISTANCES L m d L Common Diam. Size Preservation Suitability Value Construction Action` Reason Notes Name 3 ft. Impact m m N O I N cerpalmatum 8 18*16 80 60 Fair/Good 1,080 Low Save Construction: see Note below 2 3 4; Bloodgood', Japanese maple, red 61 i Construction: Anew raised planter is proposed around the tree. I need to know about the planter construction and understand how close it will be to the tree trunk. { blow-up of the area and the existing tree is requested. Landscaping: water conserving plantings are proposed around this tree. Japanese maple is not a drought tolerant tree; it has a moderate to high water requirement. Landscape appropriately around it or remove it and replace it with a drought tolerant tree. There should be no soil disturbance for planting or irrigation within at least 3 feet of the trunk. Condition: Canopy somewhat constrained by existing building roof. 62 ilanthus 15 28.30 80 60 Fair/Good $280 Severe Remove Construction Construction: within area of 4 6 7 altissima, demo (new asphalt to be ree-of-Heaven installed). 63 Quercus 19,19,17 35*45 75 1 70 Fair/Good $19,100 Severe Redesign Construction Construction: see Notes 9 15 18 agrifolia, in below. coast live oak progress I have discussed this tree and the design around it with the architects. So that I am more certain about the impact of proposed construction on the tree I request an levation detail drawing of the area underneath the canopy of this tree including subgrade preparation. 64 Eriobotrya japonica, 6,7,9 20*22 90 70 Fair 2,090 Severe Remove Construction The architects and I did agree 4 7 20 to remove this tree since it is loquat messy (fruit drop) and redesign around it to safe the tree was not worthwhile. Sequoia 48 60*25 75 60 Fair/Good 21,500 Severe Save Construction Construction: see Notes 12 20 48 sempervirens, 1 below. 65 coast redwood The changes made since the architects and I had a discussion on site about this tree are sufficient — careful removal of pavement and replacement with coarse organic mulch, parking spaces moved away from tree. I I PO Box 3714, Saratoga, CA 95070. 408-725-1357. decah@pacbell.net. http://www.decah.com. T. mary s. HrporisT Keview of Mans received w/UU-01Z. Page 3 of 4 Deborah Ellis, MS Consulting Arborist & Horticulturist Scruice since IQe-/ TREE ROOT CONDITION PROTECTION Species Trunk Expected DISTANCES md Common Diam. Size a Preservation Suitability Value Construction Action Reason Notes Name @ 3 ft. L a_, u Im actp o o N EL 0ate+ P7 LO Magnolia 7 18*15 70 50 Fair 1020 Moderate/ Remove Landscaping Construction (Landscaping) 2 3 7 grandiflora, Severe or see Notes below) southern redesign 68 magnolia ater conserving plantings are proposed around this tree. Southern magnolia is not a drought tolerant tree; it has a moderate to high water requirement. Landscape appropriately around it or remove it and replace it with a drought tolerant tree. There should be no soil disturbance for planting or irrigation within at least 3 feet of the trunk. uniperus 10 25*18 60 60 Fair/Poor 620 Low/Moderate Debatable Condition, Construction (Landscape (see 2 4 12 chinensis Species Notes below) Torulosa', 69 Hollywood juniper Construction (Landscaping): New drought tolerant landscaping is planned 4 feet from the trunk. This is alright, but keep in mind that older junipers such as this are very intolerant of root system changes or disturbance. I recommend maintaining a 5-foot undisturbed zone around the trunk, filled only with organic mulch. Condition: Some dead branches. 81 Lagerstroemia 4 60 60 Fair 400 Severe Remove Construction Other: No tag on tree 1 2 3 hybrid, crape 110x5 originally thought this tree myrtle as not „on the property)_.. PO Box 3714, Saratoga, CA 95070. 408-725-1357. decahCrzpacbell.net. http://www.decoh.com. St. Mary's. Arborist Review of Plans received 10/17/2012. Page 4 of 4 Deborah Ellis, MS Consulting Arborist &Horticulturist Service since 1984 ARBORIST REPORT St Mary's Parish & School 219 Bean Avenue Los Gatos, California Prepared for: Jennifer Savage Town of Los Gatos Community Planning Department 110 E. Main Street Los Gatos, CA 95031 Prepared by: Deborah Ellis, MS. Consulting Arborist & Horticulturist Registered Consulting Arborist #305, American Society of Consulting Arborists Board Certified Master Arborist WE-0457B, International Society of Arboriculture RECEWED Certified Professional Horticulturist #30022, American Society for Horticultural Science HAY o 12012 MAY 1, 2012 TOWN OF LOS GATOS PLANNING DIVISION Deborah Ellis, 20t2. This report may be reproduced in whole or in part by only the client and the client's authorized representatives and only for use with the subject project and/or property. All other reproduction requires the expressed written or verbal consent of Deborah Ellis prior to reproduction. PO Box 3714, 5aratogo, CA 95070. 408-725-1357. decah@pacbell.net. http://www.decah.com. Deborah Ellis, MS Consulting Arborist &Horticulturist Service Since I QN-1 Table of Contents TREEMAP #1 (WEST SITE).....................................................................................................................................................................................................1 TREEMAP #2 (EAST SITE)......................................................................................................................................................................................................2 SUMMARY.............................................................................................................................................................................................................................3 Table1 Summary Tree Table.................................................................................................................................................................................................6 Table2 Trees to Remove......................................................................................................................................................................................................10 Table3 "Debatable" Trees..................................................................................................................................................................................................1 1 Treeson Neighboring Properties..........................................................................................................................................................................................12 RECOMMENDATIONS........................................................................................................................................................................................................13 APPENDIX...........................................................................................................................................................................................................................15 Table4 Complete Tree Table..............................................................................................................................................................................................15 Explanationof Tree Table Data Columns: ..................................................................................................................................................................... 28 Glossary................................................................................................................................................................................................................................32 SupportingInformation..........................................................................................................................................................................................................34 Purpose& Use of Report....................................................................................................................................................................................................34 Methodology34 Observations........................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 35 TreeProtection Distances.....................................................................................................................................................................................................35 3 to 5 X DBH..........................................................................................................................................................................................................................35 OTPZ(Optimum Tree Protection Zone)...........................................................................................................................................................................36 LosGatos General Tree Protection Directions..................................................................................................................................................................37 Assumptions& Limitations.....................................................................................................................................................................................................39 Cover photo: the beautifully landscaped interior courtyard of St. Mary's School and Church. Redwood tree #38 and Douglas fir #39 are in the background, right to left, respectively. All photos in this report were taken by 1). Ellis on April 5, 2012. I PO Box 3714, Saratoga, CA 95070. 408-725-1357. decah@pacbell.net, http://www.decah.com. TREE MAP #1 (WEST SITE) MAST& I: y 072 I04 z l ' • -6••7 w I fI•8 '. 4 I 010 I ii I i•12 f J W j—,•19 Ii i I.14 3 0 ( Deborah Ellis, MS Consulting Arborist & Horticulturist = t Service since 1984 45k 59 * t58057 q! $ 1 fti' cii 1 _ .044 ;. 79 , • 77 !ter' S2 E? =" 80 1, Of k43`M :"®i1 { ; IE a047 .s :%' k ,042 a q • 49`_=• 50 • 7f it t ` 4175,, _036 N T• 7' • 32 033r • 34 S 3 0 ` f 4 •35 z A I 39®I all 4 I 2425 21 22 23_ S- • • N0 8 029 26 PO Box 3714 Saratoga CA 95070. 408-725-1357. decah@pacbeil.net. http://www.decGh.com. Arborist Report for St. Mary's Parish. May 1, 2012. Page 1 of 40 Deborah Ellis, MS Consulting Arborist & Horticulturist Service since 1984 TREE MAP #2 (EAST SITE) Neighbor's CT .- alive I I - Neighbor's dr C3Pears 67 966 y // Y 1 'Ii ..... _.. .-i Il_ }/ ----•+-_.-.-.. _. _^ f•-..-.—' S t 4 Jhv :( — n 4 — l- wI'al f R 65 R 64 .'. . _ • _ =' X 62 - - - ---- ^eee ( j z y ^' z Legend G¢j • Save Tree :L'a I _ / Debatable - Read about -- L------- L_.__._-. (j I • , a,,.._.,.. ............... ,. "".: i X Remove Tree - _--•. + 'v - .. 7 3 x .+ JkI ' 6$ R * 69 Remove orMimi } R Redesign • . C mmw 061 I a c: 70 •1^, ® 71 t..._. .._ Y M a o ..... ,.'......,......_ ....,.f,.. :._.._,.. , ;i ,._, MATCHLII E. - - -• 60. ry iy.,,-..'- a.. 1 rIs LUn lw_i A 1 v p ,.)..' i , 4 .. ..._a, l. • w,c"i=, .-a . . .,,. ..e rig 1 .,..,d. .. PO Box 3714, Saratoga, CA 95070. 408-725-1357. decah@pacbell.net. http://www.decoh.cotn. Arborist Report for St. Mary's Parish. May 1, 2012. Page 2 of 40 Deborah Ellis, ME; Consulting Arborist & Horticulturis SUMMARY Service since J 9S4 There are 81 protected trees' on the project site. These trees are described briefly the Summary Tree Table (Table 1) beginning on page 6 and in greater detail in the Complete Tree Table (Table 4) beginning on page 15. The Complete Tree Table also includes recommendations for reducing construction impact to trees when possible and practical. Based upon the plans that I have reviewed for this proiect: Six of these trees are either proposed or may have to be removed due to construction. These trees are listed in Table 2 on page 10. Six of these trees are "debatable" save or remove due to factors such as: tree condition, tree species, uncertainty about the extent of construction impact on the tree, or for other reasons. These trees are listed in Table 3 on page 11. You can also read more about these trees in the Notes column of the Complete Tree Table. It should be possible to save the remaining 69 trees on site, if those that are near construction are adequately protected before, during and after the work. For those trees that will be retained on the site, the Los Gatos General Tree Protection Directions are included beginning on page 37. The Tree Preservation Strategy for this proiect is: Attempt to save as many existing trees as possible except for those trees that are within or too close to proposed construction, trees that are in poor condition, pose unacceptable risk, or that may cause significant problems on the renovated site. My general impression of the trees on this site is: The trees here tend to be in good condition, especially relative to their vigor. For many of these trees, their good vigor is probably associated with the availability of adequate soil moisture via irrigation. For the purpose of this project, a protected tree in Los Gatos as defined in the Los Gatos Town Code Division 2 Tree Protection, Section 29.10.0960 12 3 2010 the Scope of Protected Trees is any tree with a 4-inch or greater diameter of any trunk, when removal relates to any review for which zoning approval or subdivision approval is required. PO Box 3714, Saratoga, CA 95070. 408-725-1357. decah@pacbell.net. http://www.decah.com. Arborist Report for St. Mary's Parish. May 1, 2012. Page 3 of 40 S'aruice since 19S4 The key trees for this site that could be affected by construction are: 63, a multi -trunk] 9, 19 and 17-inch coast live oak that may have to be removed unless nearby proposed construction is modified. 65, a 48-inch redwood tree, same predicament as above. Left Photo: coast live oak #63 at left, with tree -of -Heaven #62 at right. In the proposed redesign the tree -of -heaven will be removed and the oak will remain. But the oak has too much new pavement proposed around it, even though much of the existing pavement around it will be removed (see also photos, next page). Right photo: redwood #65, along Bean Avenue, which has too much proposed work too close to the trunk. I PO Box 3714, Saratoga, CA 95070. 408-725-1357. decah@pacbell.net. http://www.decoh.com. I Arborist Report for St. Mary's Parish. May 1, 2012. Page 4 of 40 Oak #63. Left photo: lower trunk from the southwest. Note the grade change from the playground (higher) to the sidewalk and buildings (lower). This must be addressed in the design. The grade within the undisturbed area around the trunk must be just that - undisturbed (except for careful pavement removal). Right photo: lower trunk from the Northeast. Note that demo of the existing building will have be done carefully, because one of the trunks of the tree is very close to the roof. PO Box 3714, Saratoga, CA 95070. 408-725-1357. decahe Arborist Report for St. Mary's Parish. May 1, 2012. Deborah Ellis, MS Consulting Arborist & Horticulturisl II.net. http://www.decoh.com. Service spice 1984 Page 5 of 40 A Deborah Ellis, NHS:-' S Consulting Arborist & Horticulturist Service since 19S4 TABLE 1 SUMMARY TREE TABLE Continued through page 9. A tree number in parentheses (1-14) below the tree number is the tree number that was listed for this tree on the December 11, 2011 Landscape Plan. The first number however, matches the tree's number tag in the field, and also the free numbers on the Tree Maps. Tree # Common Name Trunk Diam. @3ft. Preservation Suitability Expected Construction Impact Action Reason for Removal or "Debatable" 01 02 Carolina laurel cherry Carolina laurel cherry 9 18 if IGood ILow Save Isave 03 JColorado spruce 118 IGood Low Isave 04 Isouthern magnolia 15 fair/Good Low ISave 05 Isouthern magnolia 19 lGood Low Isave 06 Hinoki false cypress 10 Fair Low Isave 07 1yew pine —17— Fair/Poor Low Isave 08 Calif. fan palm 17 IGood Low ISave 09 Icalif. fan palm 116 Fair Low IDebatable Istructure 10 1yew pine 19 JFair Isave i 11 12 1yew pine Isouthern magnolia 110 14 IFair lGood Low JLow Isave Isave j 13 Isouthern magnolia 110 lGood Low ISave I 14 Isouthern magnolia 113 IGood Low Isave 15 Isouthern magnolia 17 lGood Low Isave 16 incense cedar 21 Fair Low Isave 17 lincense cedar 117 lFair Low Isave 18 incense cedar 116 lFair Low Isave 19 20 lHollywood juniper JCalif. fan palm 17 133 Fair Fair Low Low Save Save 21 Calif. fan palm - - 33 Fair/Good l-ow Save PO Box 3714 Saratoga, CA 95070. 408-725-1357. decah@pacbell.net. hti p://www.decah.com. Arborist Report for St. Mary's Parish. May 1, 2012. Page 6 of 40 Deborah Ellis, MS Consulting Arborist & Horticulturis t sCa. Service since IOS-1 Tree # Common Name Trunk Diam. @ 3ft. Preservation Suitability Expected Construction Impact Action Reason for Removal or "Debatable" 22 coast live oak II 1 Fair/Poor Low Save 23 lCalif. black walnut 112 lFair Low Isave 24 lcoast live oak 117,12 Fair/Good Low Save 25 coast live oak 117,12 Fair/Good Low Isave 26 lcoast live oak 7,7,1 1,12 IFair Low ISave 27 coast live oak 12 Fair Low Isave 28 lcoast live oak 4,2,2,1 lFair Low Isave 29 lcoast live oak 113,21 Fair/Good lLow Isave 30 ash species 110 Fair/Poor Low Save 31 lcoast live oak 8(2.5) lFair Low Isave 32 Icrabapple 14 lFair Low Isave 33 Icarolina laurel cherry 16 fair/Good Low Isave 34 Icarolina laurel cherry 6 Fair/Poor Low Save 35 Icarolina laurel cherry 4,3,3,2 Fair/Good Low Isave 36 Icarolina laurel cherry 14 IFair ILow Isave 37 Iblack acacia 114 lFair lLow iSave 38 Iredwood 166 lGood Low Save 39 IDouglas fir 133 lGood Low Save 40 Carolina laurel cherry 14 Fair/Poor Low Isave 41 Icarolina laurel cherry 14 Fair/Poor lLow Save 42 Icarolina laurel cherry 14 Fair/Good Low Save 43 Icarolina laurel cherry 17 1poor ILow Debatable lOverall Condition 44 Carolina laurel cherry 15 lFair Low Save 45 lCarolina laurel cherry 14 Fair/Poor Low Isave 46 lCarolina laurel cherry 18 Good Low Isave 47 Carolina laurel cherry 18 IGood Low Save PO Box 3714, Saratoga, CA 95070. 408-725-1357. decah@pacbell.net. http://www.decoh.com. Arborist Report for St. Mary's Parish. May 1, 2012. Page 7 oT 40 Deborah Ellis, MS Consulting Arborist & Horticulturis rt Service since 19S4 ree # Common Name Trunk Diam. 3 ff. ConstructionPreservationSuitability Expected Impact fiction Reason for Removal or "Debatable" 48 Carolina laurel cherry 10 Good Low Save 49 lCarolina laurel cherry I 10 IGood ILow Save 50 Icarolina laurel cherry 17 Fair/Good ILow Isave 51 lCarolina laurel cherry 15 IGood ILow Isave 52 tree -of -Heaven 16 jPoor ILow IDebotable 10verall Condition, Species; 53 tree -of -Heaven 111,1 1,11,7,6 lFair ILow Isave 54 tree -of -Heaven 111,9,7 Fair/Poor ILow Isave I1. 55 ICarolina laurel cherry 6 Fair/Good Moderate/Severe Save 56 lCarolina laurel cherry 15 Fair/Good IModerate ISave 57 lCarolina laurel cherry 17 Fair/Poor Low/Moderate Isave 58 ICarolina laurel cherry 14 jPoor Low/Moderate IDebatable lConclition j 59 lCarolina laurel cherry 17 Fair/Poor IModerate IDebatable lConclition, Construction 60 lCarolina laurel cherry 16 lFair ILow Isave k 61 14) Japanese maple, red 8 Fair/Good Low Save 62 tree -of -Heaven 115 Fair/Good Severe Remove Construction1 ; 63 10) coast live oak 19,19,17 Fair/Good Severe Remove or Redesign Construction 64 3) loquat 16,7,9 1 Fair Severe1 1 Remove or Redesign Construction {{! i 651(2) redwood 148 Fair/Good Severe Remove or Redesign Construction I 1664) redwood 125 Fair Moderate Save 671(5) redwood 149 Fair/Good Moderate J Save PO Box 3714, Saratoga, CA 95070. 408-725-1357. decah@pacbell.net. http://www.decoh.corn. Arborist Report for 5t. Mary's Parish. May 1, 2012. Page 8 of 40 Deborah Ellis, NIS Consulting Arborist & Horticulturis rrice since 198-1 Tree # Common Name Trunk Diam. 3 ft Preservation Suitability Expected Construction Impact Action Reason for Removal or "Debatable" 68 1) southern magnolia 7 Fair Moderate/Severe Remove or redesign Landscaping 69 13) Hollywood juniper 10 JFair/Poor Low/Moderate Debatable Condition, Species 70 southern magnolia 110 Fair/Good Low Isave 71 liapanese maple, red 18 (1.5) IFair Low Isave I- 72 liapanese maple 16 Good/Excellent Low Isave 73 Isouthern magnolia 15 Good/Excellent ILOW Isave 74 liapanese maple, red 7,9 Fair Low Save 75 liapanese maple, red 18 (2) Fair Low Isave 76 liapanese maple, red 4,4,5 Fair/Good Low Isave 77 liapanese maple, red 13A Fair/Good Low Isave 78 Icaroiina laurel cherry 17 Fair/Good Low Isave 79 Ifiowering cherry 16 IFair Low isave 80 Ifioweang cherry it] IGood Low Save 81 9) crape myrtle 4 JFair Severe Remove Construction End of Summary Table PC Box 3714, Saratoga, CA 95070. 408-725-1357, decah@pacbell.net. http://www.decoh.com. Arborist Report for St. Mary's Parish. May 1, 2012. Page 9 of 40 Deborah Ellis, MS Consulting Arborist & Horticulturist S rvice since 1984 TABLE 2 TREES TO REMOVE RTree Common Trunk Diam. Preservation Suitability Expected 11 Reason for Name Construction Impact Removal I-62tree-of 11 I--- Heaven 15 Fair/Good evere coast live oak 19,19,17 Fair/Good Severe Construction6 } 10 16,73 Fair Severe Construction6Iloquat 6) redwood 48I Fair/Good Severe fConstruction Construction68southernmagnolia7FairModerate/Severe I Landscaping) 1) 81 9) crape myrtle 4 Fair Severe Construction 6 trees Redesign recommended to avoid removal (4 of the 5 trees). See Complete Tree Table, Notes column. PO Box 3714, Saratoga, CA 95070. 408-725-1357. decah@pacbell.net. http://www.decah.com. Arborist Report for 5t. Mary's Parish. May 1, 2012. Page 10 of 40 4crnicc since I QS4 TABLE 3 "DEBATABLE" TREES Tree # Common Trunk Diam. Preservation Suitability Expected Reason Debatable" Name 3 ft. Construction Impact 09 Calif, fan palm 16 Fair ILow Structure 43 lCarolina laurel cherry 17 Poor 1-ow 10verall Condition 52 tree -of -Heaven 16 JPoor Low 10verall Condition, Species 58 Icarolina laurel cherry 14 1poor Low/Moderate lCondition 59 Carolina laurel cherry17 —Fair/Poor Moderate lCondition, Construction 69 Hollywood juniper 10 Fair/Poor Low/Moderate Condition, Species 6 trees PO Box 3714, Saratoga, CA 95070. 408-725-1357. decah@pacbell.net. http://www.decah.com. Arborist Report for St. Mary's Parish. May 1, 2012. Page I I of 40 Deborah Ellis, MS Consulting Arborist & Horticulturis TREES ON NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES 4rrcicc Since 198-1 There are a few trees on neighboring properties that were included by the landscape architects on their landscape plan. These trees are numbered #6, 7, 8 and 12 on the Landscape Plan. They are (respectively) 6-9-inch diameter flowering pear trees (left photo below) and an olive tree (right photo). Neighboring trees must be protected in the same manner as trees on the project site. These particular trees may have some canopy interference - the project arborist should review this as a part of the tree protection fencing plan. Construction perimeter fencing may be used for tree protection fencing, and when possible this fencing should be positioned outward to exclude neighboring tree canopies from the project site. PO Box 3714, Saratoga, CA 95070. 408-725-1357. decah@pacbell.net. http://www.decoh.com. Arborist Peport for St. Mary's Parish. May 1, 2012. Page 12 of 40 Service since 1984 RECOMMENDATIONS t ) Re -number trees on the landscape plans to match the tree numbers in this report as well as the actual tree tags on the trees in the field. 2) In general, try to keep improvements (and any additional over -excavation or work area beyond the improvement) as far from tree trunks as possible. 3xDBH2 should be considered the absolute minimum distance from any disturbance to the tree trunk on one side of the trunk, for root protection. If there will be disturbances on multiple sides of the trunk, then 5xDBH or greater should be used. 3) For those trees that will be retained on the site, follow the Town of Los Gatos General Tree Protection Directions on pages 37 -39 to the greatest extent possible, before site demo and during and after construction. 4) 1 would also like to prepare some Supplemental Tree Protection Directions after working with the architects on the designs around trees #63 and #65. 5) The following plans have or have not been reviewed prior to the development of this Arborist Report. Those plans not reviewed should be reviewed by me; otherwise potential construction impacts to trees may be missed and trees will be exposed to unnecessary damage. Plans Reviewed or not Reviewed continued on the next page) PLAN DATE SHEET REVIEWED SHOULD REVIEW NOTES Existing Site Topographic Map including existing tree trunk locations 1217/11 C4.0- 4.1 X Site Plan Construction Staging Demolition Proposed Site Layout 3/14/12 A3.0,3.1 X Conceptual Campus Plan, Land Use Plan Grading/Drainage 12/7/11 C1.0- 1.2 X Preliminary Grading & Utility Plan Underground Utility X Site & Building Sections 3/14/12 A4.1, X DBH is tree trunk diameter in inches "at breast height", measured at 4.5 feet above ground level. This is the forestry and arboricultural standard measurement height that is also used in many tree -related calculations. PO Box 3714, Saratoga, CA 95070. 408-725-1357. decah@pacbell.net. http://www.decah.com_ ) Arborist Report for 5t. Mary's Parish. May 1, 2012. Page 13 of 40 Deborah Ellis, MS Consulting Arborist & Horticulturis Plans Reviewed or not Reviewed (continued from the previous page) 4ervice since 1984 PLAN DATE SHEET REVIEWED SHOULD REVIEW NOTES 5.1 Building Exterior Elevations X Erosion Control 12/7/11 C2.0 X Preliminary Stormwater Management Plan Roof Shadow Stud Construction Details that would affect trees (for example building foundations, pavement installation including sub -grade preparation, underground utility installation) Landscape Planting 12/7/11 L1 X Irrigation Plan Landscape & Irrigation Details 12/7/11 L2 X X Limited information. 6) General Tree Maintenance: Do no unnecessary pruning, fertilization or other tree work. Pre -construction pruning should be limited to the absolute minimum required for construction clearance. Additional instructions for pruning are included in the General Tree Protection Specifications. In general, trees should be pruned as little as possible. PO Box 3714, Saratoga, CA 95070. 408-725-1357, decah@pacbell.net, http://www.decah.com. Arborist Report for St. Mary's Parish. May 1, 2012. Page 14 of 40 Deborah Ellis, MS Consulting Arborist & Horticulturis APPENDIX TABLE 4 COMPLETE TREE TABLE Service since, 1984 Data field information is included on pages 28 to 32. Terms in bold print are explained in the Glossary on pages 32 - 33. This Table is continued through page 27. a m g Common Diam.. Size. CONDITI Preservation Suitability Value Expected Construction Action Reason Notes E ROOT TECTIOONNSpeciesTrunkLANCES Name @ 3 ff o Im actp s o x to a- 1 N M x O 01 Prunus 18*15 60 60 Fair 1,340 Low Save Condition: Sunscald on 2 4 4 caroliniona south trunk. Carolina laurel 02 cherry Carolina laurel I I S 14*12 90 80 Good 1,440 Low Save M 3 03 cherry Picea pungens, 18 35*22 90 70 Good 3,040 Low Save tion: Large d surface roots inr 4 FrColorado 04 spruce Magnolia 5 14*12 70 75 Fair/Good 580 Low Save 1 2 3 grandiflora, southern OS magnolia southern 9 18*18 75 80 Good 1,360 Low Save 2 4 9 magnolia PO Box 3714, Saratoga, CA 95070. 408-725-1357. decah@pacbell.net. http://www.decah.com. Arborist Report for St. Mary's Parish. May 1, 2012. Page 15 of 40 Deborah Ellis, MS Consulting Arborist & Horticulturist TREE ROOT CONDITI PROTECTIO 0 Species Common Name Trunk Diam. @ 3 ft. Size ON Preservation o Suitability j N Value Expected Construction Impact Action Reason Notes N DISTANCES X n FO 06 c hamaecypor 10 18*18 60 70 Fair 2,200 Low Save 2 4 7 is obtusa, Hinoki false cypress 07 Podocarpus 7 16*15 70 40 Fair/Poor 940 Low Save Other: Area too 2 3 5 macrophyllus, crowded with trees. yew pine 08 Washingtonio 17 30*12 80 80 Good 800 Low Save 4 7 8 filifera, 09 Calif. fan palm Calif. fan palm 16 30*12 80 50 Fair 650 Low Debatable Structure Condition: Death of seudobark (false bark) 4 7 8 and insect frass at trunk base -- recommend investigating further. 20 feet clear trunk. 10 yew pine 9 22*22 70 40 Fair 1,030 Low r Condition: Sprawling area too crowded and I 4 7 11 12 yew pine southern magnolia 10 14 25*20 30*22 75 80 40 70 Fair Good 1,700 3,110 Low Low Save Save I shaded). Condition: Tree engulfing stake remove stake). 2 4 Tri, 7 11 PO Box 3714, Saratoga, CA 95070. 408-725-1357. decah@pocbell.net. htlp://www.decoh.com. Arborist Report for St. Mary's Parish. May 1, 2012. Page 16 of 40 Deborah Ellis, MS Consulting Arborist & HortiaUltUris u a k Serr*e since 1984 THE ROOT CONDITI PROTECTIO ON N Species Trunk Expected DISTANCES a, o Common Diam. @ 3 ft. Size Preservation Suitability Value Construction Impact Action Reason Notes m m a, Name o rn X 13 southern magnolia I10 25*20 f 100 70 IGood I$1,820 11-ow2Saver I 4 10 14 southern 13 30*25 100 75 Good 3,270 Low Save 3 1 5 113magnolia 15 southern 7 120* 15 75 1 75 Good 1$1280 Low Save magnolia 16 Calocedrus 21 20*18 100 80 Fair 5,400 Low Save Condition: Planted 5 9 21 decurrens, underneath overhead incense cedar power lines (not a good idea — this is a tall growing tree species that will need to be topped for wire clearance). Topped (6- inch diameter leader cut). 17 incense cedar 117 135-20 1 90 1 80 Fair 3,330 Low Save I Condition: Same as 1 4 1 7 1 13 previous. 18 incense cedar 16 25*18 80 75 Fair 2,690 Low Save Condition: Same as 4 7 12 previous; topped (6- inch diameter leader cut). PO Box 3714, Saratoga, CA 95070. 408-725-1357. decah@pacbell.net. http://www.decah.com. Arborist Report for 5t. Mary's Parish. May 1, 2012. Page 17 of 40 Deborah Ellis, MS Consulting Arborist & HOrtICUltUris Nervice Shia! 198.1 TREE ROOT CONDITI PROTECTIO ON N Species Trunk Expected DISTANCES m Diam. Size Preservation Value Construction Action I Reason Notes a, Common @ 3 ft. N Suitability Impact m m Nameo rn u 0 co o to O 19 luniperus I 20* 12 70 70 Fair 1 190 Low Save 2 3 7 chinensis Torulosa', Hollywood 20 juniper Calif. fan palm 33 45*8 60 70 Fair 1140 Low Save Condition: For enough to side of overhead 8 14 25 electric wires not to be a problem. Approximate clear runk height 35 feet. 21 fan palm 50*10 1 70 1 70 JFair/Good 1400 Low Save I Condition: Same as 1previous. 8 1 14 125 j JCalif. 133 20* 18 75 40 Fair/Poor 1,100 Low Save Condition: Major crook 3 4 5 22 Quercus agrifolia, 11 to trunk over street, with coast live oak end -weight over the bend. Condition: Growing through cyclone fence. 3 5 12 23Juglanshindsiicalifornica, 12 25*16 70 50 Fair 750 Low Save Calif. black walnut i 24 coast live oak 17,12 30*25 75 50 Fair/Good 8,800 Low Save Condition: Overhead 7 11 120 Trestoside. 25 coast live oak 130*25 75 60 JFair/Good 6,900 Low Save f Condition: Same as 6 9 l 7 117, 12 previous. I PO Box 3714, Saratoga, CA 95070. 408-725-1357. decah@pacbell.net. http://www.decoh.corn. Arborist Report for St. Mary's Parish. May 1, 2012. Page 18 of 40 Deborah Ellis, MS Consulting Arborist & Horticulturis Vercice since 198.1 2 species Common Trunk Diam. Size CONDITI ON Preservation Suitability Value Expected Construction Action Reason Notes TREE PROTECTIO DISTANCES ROOT o Name @3 ff. o Impact a: to o 0- in u N ti 6 110 O f 1226coastliveoak1,7,1 1,12 30`30 75 l 50 Fair - _ — f '7,500 I Low I'ave I Condition: Same as prev 27 coast live oak 12 30*13 75 40 Fair 1,610 Low Save Condition: Some as previous. Very grove - 3 5 6 affected. 28 coast live oak 4,2,2,1 12*10 60 60 Fair 600 Low Save Condition: Very shaded FY 4 understory tree. 29 coast live oak 13,21 30*40 85 70 Fair/Good 1 1,70 0 Low Save Some as previous regarding Condition: n- I 12 21 overhead wires. 30Fraxinus es, spe— ash 10 35*25 80 50 Fair/Poor 640 Low Save Other: Some pavement lifting 2 4 5 31 ash speciess Icoast live oak 8 (2.5) 10*10 85 40 Fair 740 Low Save I 2 3 1 4 32 crabapple 1 1 *8 80 50 Fair 520 Low Save I 2 33 Carolina laurel cherry 6 16*16 80 70 Fair/Good 1280 Low Save Condition: Large circling root at root 1 2 rcollar. 34 Carolina laurel r 15*15 40 1 50 Fair/Poor 770 Low Save Condition: Chlorotic. FFP 35 cherry Carolina laurel 4,3,3,2 80 60 Fair/Good 1,080 Low Save 2 3 rcherryr;F8 PO Box 3714, Saratoga, CA 95070. 408-725-1357. decahepacbell.net. http://www.decah.com. Arborist Report for St. Mary's Parish. May 1, 2012. Page 19 of 40 Deborah Ellis, MS Consulting Arborist & Horticulturist Service since 19S-1 CONDITI TREE ROOT PROTECTIO ON N Speciesp Trunk Preservation Expected 1 DISTANCES da, Common Diam. Size Suitability Value Construction Action Reason Notes Nameo @ 3 ff. Impact 03 o a. u N o rXi uXi O 36 Carolina laurel cherry 4 1 2*9 60 160 Fair 480 Low ave I __ 1 2 3 37 Acacia 14 40*25 90 50 Fair 640 Low Save 3 6 7 melanoxylon, black acacia 38 Sequoia sempervirens, Coast 66 80*40 75 70 Good 32,00 0 Low Save 16 27 66 redwood 39 redwood) Pseudotsuga 75*30 80 70 Good 7,500 Low Save 8 14 41 menziesii, 33 40 Douglas fir Carolina laurel cherry 4 10*7 80 40 Fair/Poor 480 Low Save Condition: Severe sunscald trunk canker. 1 2 3 Chlorotic. 41 laurel 14"9 50 60 Fair/Poor 440 Low Save Condition: Chlorotic. F11 3 42 Icaroiinacherry Carolina laurel P110 70 80 Fair/Good 600 Low Save ICondition: Chlorotic. 2 3 43 cherry Carolina laurel cherry 1 16*10 40 40 Poor 680 I_ow Debatable Overall Condition Condition: Chlorotic. 2 3 4 PO Box 3714, Saratoga, CA 95070. 408-725-1357. decah@pacbell.net. http://www.decoh.com. Arborist Report for St. Mary's Parish. May 1, 2012. Page 20 of 40 Deborah Ellis, MS Consulting Arborist & Horticulturist µ•. Vt rnice since 19R-1 TREE ROOT CONDITI PROTECTIO Species Trunk ON Preservation Expected N DISTANCES N 2 Common Diam. Size Suitability Value Construction Action Reason Notes r Nameo @ 3 ft.a, Impactp ca o 5 N ci n O 44 Carolina laurel cherry 5I 14"9 70 60 Fair 520 Low Save Condition: Chlorotic. 1 2I 3 45 Carona laurel 4cherry5050Fair/Poor 400 Low Save Condition: Chlorotic. I I I 13 46 Carolina laurel 8 16*18 100 75 Good 1,490 Fw Save f 2 3 f 4 cherry 47 Carolina laurel 8 116-16 100 1 70 Good 1,510 Low Save I F 2 3 4 48 cherry Carolina laurel cherry 10I 22*18 90 1 70 Good 2,210 LowI SaveI I Condition: Some trunk isunscold. 2 4 1 49 Carolina laurel 110 120-20 100 1 70 Good 2,340 Low Save I 4 50 cherry Ctarrolina laurel 7 f 18*16 75 70 Fair/Good 1240 Low Save 12 13 ril-arolina laurel 5I 18*16 90 70 Good 640 Low Save 1 2 FT 52 cry Ailanthus alfissima, 6 I6*10 80 40 Poor 1020 Low Debatable Condition: Overhead electric lines. 1 2 1 3 tree -of - Heaven tree -of- IHeaven l l,l1,7, f5 F;5—[-O 70 FairI 360I LowI I Save I Condition: Stum s rout[3 p p and suckers. 54 tree -of- P9,7 135* 18 75 1 50 Fair/Poor 330 Low Save 5 8 9 Heaven PO Box 3714, 5aratoga, CA 95070, 408-725-1357. decahepacbell.net, http://www.decoh.com. Arborist Report for 5t. Mary's Parish. May 1, 2012. Page 21 of 40 Deborah Ellis, MS Consulting Arborist & Horticulturist ti J t'croice since 1 QS4 TREE ROOT CONDITI PROTECTIO Species ON N DISTANCESTrunk Preservation Expected ww Diam. Size Value Construction Action Reason Notes Common @ 3 ft. y Suitability Impact x x Name o rn o o a- N X X O 55 Carolina laurel 6 I5'16 100 60 Fair/Good 1360 Moderate/Sever Save Construction: proposed 1 2 3 cherry a water line centerline 2.5 feet from trunk. Move water line farther from tree if possible. 56 Carolina laurel 5 1 4*9 80 60 Fair/Good 560 Moderate Save Construction: proposed 1 2 3 cherry water line centerline 4 feet from trunk. 57 Carolina laurel 7 16*14 60 50 Fair/Poor 940 Low/Moderate Save Construction: proposed 2 3 4 cherry water line centerline 8 feet from trunk. 58 Carolina laurel 4 13*9 50 40 Poor 360 Low/Moderate Debatable Condition Construction: proposed 1 2 3 cherry water line centerline 6.5 feet from trunk. Condition: Extensive trunk cankers. 59 Carolina laurel 7 16*14 50 50 Fair/Poor 850 Moderate Debatable Condition, Construction: water 2 3 3 i cherry Construction line/fire service trenches are 4.5 feet from the trunk (this is centerline of water pipe), so trenching will be closer. Condition: large trunk canker. PO Box 3714, Saratoga, CA 95070. 408-725-1357. decahepacbell.net, hitp://www.decoh.cotn. Arborist Report for St. Mary's Parish. May 1, 2012. Page 22 of 40 Deborah Ellis, MS Consulting Arborist & Horticulturis Service since 19.0 TREE E ROOT CONDITI i PROTECTIO Species Trunk ON Expected N DISTANCES y a, 2 Common Diam. Size Preservation Suitability Value Construction Action Reason Notes Name @ 3 ft N o ' Impact x o x o a- 1 N ci 1 O i60 Carolina laurel cherry 6 16*15 60 60 Fair I'$1020 Low Save I I 2 13I Acer 8 18*16 80 60 Fair/Good 1,080 Low Save Construction: see Note 2 3 4 palmatum below Bloodgood', Japanese maple, red 61 14) Construction: A new raised planter is proposed around the tree. Please put this tree on your list of trees to discuss with me at a meeting -- I want to go over the planter construction and understand how close it will be to the tree trunk. A blow-up of the area and the existing tree is requested. Landscaping: water conserving plantings are proposed around this tree. Japanese maple is not a drought tolerant tree; it has a moderate to high water requirement. Landscape appropriately around it or remove it and replace it with a drought tolerant tree. There should be no soil disturbance for planting or irrigation within at least 3 feet of the trunk. Condition: Canopy somewhat constrained by existing building roof. 62 tree -of- 15 28*3 80 60 Fair/Good 280 Severe Remove Construction lConstruction: within 4 b 7 11) Heaven 0 area of demo (new asphalt to be installed). coast live oak 19,19,17 35-4M 70 Fair/Good 7re Remove Construction Construction: see Notes 9 15 18 5 or below. Redesign Construction: WHOA THERE! The existing building and surrounding asphalt will be demo'd and new asphalt pavement installed around the tree. A63tinytreegrateatgrade (4.5 feet square) will be placed around the trunk and then there will be 5.5 feet of pavers. Back to the drawing board! A10) much larger area must be preserved for this tree. I would like to see at least a 15-foot radius all around the trunk that will be filled with nothing but organic mulch. Pavers require the same subgrade preparation as concrete pavement, so this offers the tree no benefit but serves to remove 95%+ of its root system. Please arrange for a meeting with me so that we can work out the details around this large and still living tree. I will expect to see a blow-up of the area around this tree, including an accurately scaled base of the tree, tree dripline, lowest branches, etc. PO Box 3714, Saratoga, CA 95070. 408-725-1357. decah@pacbell.net. http://www.decah.com. At-borist Report for St. Mary's Parish. May 1, 2012. Page 23 of 40 Deborah Ellis, MS Consulting Arborist & HortICUItUris 4orrice Since IQS-! TREE ROOT CONDITI PROTECTIO ON N Species Trunk Expected DISTANCES 1 w Diam. Size Preservation Suitability Value Construction Action Reason Notes bt Common @ 3 ff' w Impact Name o rn u m m N Cl) N 1=riobotrya japonica, loquat 6,7,9 0 2 2 90 70 Fair 2,090 Severe rRedesvi Construction Construction (see Notes below) 4 7 20 64 Construction: A retaining wall is proposed at 7 feet from the trunk, and a storm drain catch basin at 10 feet. But new pavement will be only a foot3) from the trunk. Either move the pavement so that there will be no excavation within 4 feet of the trunk, or remove the tree. This is a loquat, not a Brisbane box, as is listed on the landscape plan. I expect that fruit drop is or will be a problem over pavement. In my opinion it makes more sense to i remove the tree rather than to redesign around it. redwood 48 60*2 75 60 Fair/Good 21,50 Severe Remove Construction Construction: see Notes 12 20 48 5 0 or below. Redesign WHOA THERE! All kinds of things are either being demo'd or built close to this tree — some of them within a few feet of the trunk and possible right on 65 top of the root collar of this tree. li would like to see a blow-up of the area around this tree with the base of the tree accurately plotted on the plan, 2) also the existing tree dripline and height of the lowest branches above the ground. Then we need to have a meeting about how things should be designed around this tree, along with the other endangered trees on this site. Things are happening on multiple sides of the trunk, so the SxDBH root protection distance should be used — but if this is not possible I at least want to see the 3xDBH distance used, plus extra other protections for this tree. Same comments on the use of porous pavers as for tree #64. Other: Significant pavement damage is being caused by roots of tree. 66 redwood 25 45*1 60 60 Fair 5,800 Moderate Save Construction: demo of 6 10 19 4) 8 existing asphalt is about 7 feet from the trunk, with new pavement at 8-9 feet. Condition: grove - affected, suppressed 1 ree. PO Box 3714, Saratoga, CA 95070. 408-725-1357. decah@pacbell.net. http://www.decah.com. Arborist Report for St. Mary's Parish. May 1, 2012. Page 24 of 40 Deborah Ellis, IBIS 44-1 Consulting Arborist & Horticulturist Servicesince TREE ROOT CONDITI PROTECTIO Species Trunk ON Expected N DISTANCES a, Size Preservation Value Construction Action Reason Notes Common Common @ 3 ft a Suitability Impact Name rn u o X O N 67 redwood 19 013 70 70 Fair/Good 22,900 Moderate gave Construction: demo 12 20 49 5) and new pavement look like they are about 12 feet from the trunk; work must be done j carefully. southern 7 18*1 70 50 Pair 1020 Moderate/ Remove Landscaping Construction 2 3 7 magnolia 5 Severe or Landscaping) (see 68 redesign Notes below) 1) water conserving plantings are proposed around this tree. Southern magnolia is not a drought tolerant tree; it has a moderate to high water requirement. Landscape appropriately around it or remove it and replace it with a drought tolerant tree. There should be no soil disturbance for planting or irrigation within at least 3 feet of the trunk. Hollywood 10 25*1 60 60 Fair/Poor 6201 Low/Moderate1 Debatable Condition, 1construction Landsca e) 2 1 4 1 12 see Notes below) uniper 8 1 1 Species 69 Construction Landsca in ):New drought tolerant landscaping is planned 4 feet from the trunk. This is alright, but keep in mind that older junipers 13) such as this are very intolerant of root system changes or disturbance. I recommend maintaining a 5-toot undisturbed zone around the trunk, filled only with organic mulch. Condition: Some dead branches. 70 southern 101 18*1 1 85 1 60 Fair/Good 1,490 Low Save 12147. magnolia 6 71 Japanese 8 (1.5) 16*1 60 60 Fair 730 Low Save 2 3 4 maple, red 4 72 Japanese 6 115*1 80 80 Good/ 1360 Low it::j— 1 2 3 maple 8 Excellent PO Box 3714, Saratoga, CA 95070. 408-725-1357, decah@pacbell.net. http://www.decoh.cotn. Arborist Report for St. Mary's Parish. May 1, 2012. Page 25 of 40 Deborah Ellis, MS Consulting Arborist & Horticulturis Service since 19S.1 TREE ROOT CONDITI PROTECTIO ON N Species Trunk Preservation Expected DISTANCES o0 Common Diam. Size a, Suitability Value Construction Action Reason Notes Name @ 3 ft. o ' Impact to o r N chX O 73 southern 15 I30"2 I 90 80 Good/ j$4,220 Low Save I 4 16 15 magnolia 5 Excellent 74 Japanese 7,9 18*2 50 75 Fair 2,970 Low Save Condition: Moderate 3 5 10 maple, red 5 twig and branch death, but some recovery. On the Japanese maples in This courtyard this is probably caused by Verticillium wilt disease. 75 Japanese 8 (2) 18*2 0 50 70 Fair 1$1,040 Low Save branches jCondition:40%of are dead. 2 I 3 4 maple, red 76 Japanese 4,4,5 15*2 75 60 Fair/Good 1,580 Low Save 77 maple, red Japanese 0 116* 1 80 60 Fair/Good 1$750 Low Save 1 2 13 maple, red 13,4 8 78 Carolina laurel 7 70 70 Fair/Good 1190 Low Save P71 cherry116-1 6 79 Prunus species, b 10*8 80 50 Fair 1 1 10 Low Save 1 2 6 lowering 80 cherry flowering cherry 1 1 15* 1 8 80 70 Good 1,120 Low Save Condition: Very large exposed surface roots 3 4 13 one is as large in diameter as the trunk. PO Box 3714, Saratoga, CA 95070. 408-725-1357. decah@pacbell.net, http://www.decoh.com. Arborist Report for St. Mary's Parish. May 1, 2012. Page 26 of 40 Deborah Ellis, MS Consulting Arborist & Horticulturis S1-rvice since 19S4 it: Species Species Common Diam. Size CONDITI ON Preservation Suitability Value Expected Construction I Action Reason Notes TREE------ r PROTECTIO N DISTANCES m Nameo @ 3 ft.m 5 Impactp M O N 81 Lagerstroemia 4 I Ox5 60 60 air 400 Severe Remove Construction Other: No tag on tree 1 2 3 hybrid, crape originally thought this myrtle tree was not on the property) Carolina laurel cherries #55 (right) and #56 (left). Both trees are planned to remain, but a new water main and fire service are planned between the cul-de-sac edge and the trees. These trees will need to be fenced off from construction and work done carefully around them. Carolina laurel cherries are the most populous tree species on this site. The preservation suitability of these trees varies from poor" to "good/excellent". These two trees are listed as having fair/good" preservation suitability. PO Box 3714, Saratoga, CA 95070. 408-725-1357. decah@pacbell.net. http://www.decoh.com. Arborist Report for St. Mary's Parish. May 1, 2012. Page 2/ of 40 Service since I QS4 EXPLANATION OF TREE TABLE DATA COLUMNS: 1) Tree Number (the field tag number of the existing tree). Each existing tree in the field is tagged with a 1.25 inch round aluminum number tag that corresponds to its tree number referenced in the arborist report, Tree Map, Tree Protection Specifications and any other project plans where existing trees must be shown and referenced. 2) Tree Name and Type: Species: The Genus and species of each tree. This is the unique scientific name of the plant, for example Prunus caroliniana where Prunus is the Genus and caroliniana is the species. The scientific names of plants can be changed from time to time, but those used in this report are from the most current edition of the Sunset Western Garden Book (2007) Sunset Publishing Corporation. The scientific name is presented at its first occurrence in the Tree Table, along with the regional common name. After that only the common name is used. 3) Trunk diameter (at 3 feet above the ground). This is the trunk diameter measurement height required by the City of Los Gatos, in lieu of DBH'. For multi -trunk trees, trunk diameter is measured for the largest trunk and estimated for all smaller trunks. A number in parentheses (2) after the trunk diameter(s) indicates that it was not possible to measure the trunk at 3 feet (due to tree architecture) and so the diameter was measured at this alternate height (in feet), which reflects a more realistic trunk diameter for the tree. Examples: an "I8" in the DBH Diameter column means that the tree has a diameter of 18 inches at 3 feet above the ground. An "18 (2)" means that trunk diameter was 18 inches at 2 feet above the ground. "18, 7, 5" means that this is a multi -trunk tree with trunk diameters of 18, 7 and 5 inches at 3 feet above the ground. 4) Size: tree size is listed as height x width in feet, estimated and approximate and intended for comparison purposes. 5) Condition Ratings: Trees are rated for their condition on a scale of zero to 100 with zero being a dead tree and 100 being a perfect tree (which is rare — like a supermodel in human terms). A 60 is "average" (not great but not terrible either). There are two components to tree condition — vigor and structure, and each component is rated separately. Averaging the two components is not useful because a very low rating for either one could be a valid reason to remove a tree from a site -- even if the other component has a high rating. Numerically speaking for each separate component: 100 is equivalent to Excellent (an 'A' academic grade), 80 is Good (B), 60 is Fair (C), 40 is Poor (D), 20 is Unacceptable (F) and 0 is Dead. 3 DBH is tree trunk diameter in inches "at breast height", measured at 4.5 feet above ground level. This is the forestry and arboricultural standard measurement height that is also used in many tree -related calculations. PO Box 3714, Saratoga, CA 95070. 408-725-1357. decah@pacbell.net, http://www.decoh.com. Arborist Report for St. Mary's Parish. May 1, 2012. Page 28 of 40 Deborah Ellis, MS Consulting Arborist & Horticulturist 14, Service since 198-1 Relative to the scope of work for this report, tree condition has been rated but not explained in detail and recommendations for the management of tree condition have not been included. The tree owner may contact Deborah Ellis for additional information on tree condition and specific recommendations for the general care of individual trees relative to their condition. The condition of the tree is considered relative to the tree species and present or future use of the site to provide an opinion on the tree's Preservation Suitability Rating (i.e. "Is this tree worth keeping on this site, in this location?) as explained in Table 5 below. Ratings such as "Fair/Good" and Fair/Poor" are intermediate in nature. The Preservation Suitability rating is not always the same as the Condition Rating because (for example) some trees with poor condition or structure can be significantly improved with just a small amount of work — and it would be worthwhile to keep the tree if this were done. Table 5 Preservation Suitabilitv Rating Explanation Trees in excellent condition are rare, but they have unusually good health and structure and Excellent provide multiple functional and aesthetic benefits to the environment and the users of the site. These are great trees. Equivalent to academic grade W. Trees in good condition: (both health and structural) that have good potential for longevity atGoodthesite. These are better than average trees equivalent to academic grade ' B'. Trees in fair condition: These trees have health and/or structural defects that may be improved with treatment. These are "average" trees — not great but not terrible either. The majority of trees on most sites tend to fall into this category. These trees will require more intensive management Fair and monitoring, and may also have shorter life spans than trees in the "Good" category. Retention of trees with moderate suitability for preservation depends upon the degree of proposed site changes. Equivalent to academic grade 'C'. Trees with significant structural defects or poor health that cannot be reasonably improved with treatment. These trees can be expected to decline regardless of management. The tree species themselves may have characteristics that are undesirable in landscape settings or mayPoorbeunsuitableforhighuseareas. I do not recommend retention of trees with low suitability for preservation in areas where people or property will be present. Equivalent to academic grade D'. These trees are dead and are not suitable for retention in their location. In certain settings None such as wilderness areas) dead trees are beneficial as food and shelter for certain animals and plants including decomposers. Equivalent to academic grade 'F'. 14. Value: Tree monetary appraisal is based upon: (1) Cost of Installation plus (2) its increase in value over a container -size tree if a larger size tree being appraised. This value is then adjusted according to: (a) Species (according to regional published species ratings), (b) Condition of the tree, and (c) Location of the tree (an average of the sub -categories of Site, Contribution and Placement). The methodology and calculations for the Trunk Formula I PO Box 3714, Saratoga, CA 95070. 408-725-1357. decah@pacbell.net, http://www.decoh.com. Arborist Report for St. Mary's Parish. May 1, 2012, Page 29 of 40 Deborah Ellis, MS Consulting Arborist & Horticulturist Service since 1954 Method are taken from two industry standard texts —The Guide for Plant Appraisal, 9th edition, 2000, edited by the Council of Tree & Landscape Appraisers and published by the International Society of Arboriculture, and the Species Classification and Group Assignment, 2004, published by the Western Chapter of the International Society of Arboriculture. The cross -sectional trunk diameter price presented in this text has been adjusted slightly downward to match the actual average wholesale cost of a 24-inch box nursery tree in this area. Note that the values produced for this report are meant for reference only and may not reflect the true value of the tree that could be calculated by a thorough and more detailed analysis of each individual tree. 15. Caveats regarding tree values: The values in this report have not been subjected to a "reasonableness test" which compares the value of trees and landscaping to the total value of the property. The values in the report were calculated quickly and are intended to be approximate and for reference only. Research on tree and landscape values has shown that landscaping can contribute up to 20% of the total property value. In some cases however, tree appraisals have produced tree values that exceed the value of the entire property. Performing a reasonableness test screens for this error. For certain trees in this report I have decreased or increased tree values when I felt that the calculated values were too high or too low. 16. The Trunk Formula Method is used for trees that are too large for practical replacement with a similar size nursery container -grown tree. This method applies to trees with trunk diameters that are larger than 8-inches, measured at 12 inches above the ground. For the purpose of this report, all trees with trunk diameters of 8 inches or greater measured at DBH (4.5 feet above the ground) are appraised by this method. 17. The Replacement Cost Method is used for smaller trees with trunk diameters up to 4-inches in diameter measured at 12 inches above the ground. This is generally equivalent to a 48-inch box -size tree. The replacement cost for such a tree shall be the average wholesale cost of the tree multiplied by two to include transportation to the site, planting and other costs. This price is then adjusted (usually downward) based upon the Condition ratings percentages for the appraised tree. For the purpose of this report, all trees with trunk diameters of 7 inches or less measured at DBH (4.5 feet above the ground) are appraised by this method. The following cost basis is used (based upon wholesale tree prices from Boething Treeland Nursery, Portola Valley, 1/5/2012): Trunk DBH Replacement tree size Replacement Tree Wholesale Cost x 2 (for insta2ation, etc.) 1" to 1" 15 gallon $50 x 2 = $100 2-3" 24" box $150 x 2 = $300 4-5" 36" box $400 x 2 = $800 6-7" 48" box $850x 2 = $1700 The replacement cost is also used for palms, which are priced based upon linear foot of clear trunk, which is the height of the trunk from the ground to the base of the live fronds. Palm species are priced (wholesale at nursery) per foot of clear trunk (trunk foot, TF)as follows: o Washingtonia filifera: $50 PO Box 3714, Saratoga, CA 95070. 408-725-1357. decah@pacbell.net, http://www.decah.com. Arborist Report for St. Mary's Parish. May 1, 2012. Page 30 of 40 Deborah Ellis, MS Consulting Arborist & Horticulturisl Service since 1984 18. Tree values for tree protection bonds: Prior to commencing work, the tree -regulating authority may require that the contractor furnish a bond equal to some portion of the total appraised value of the trees on the site based upon the values presented in the Arborist Report. Bond money will be returned to the contractor upon the completion of the project with deductions or additional fines imposed based upon tree protection compliance and the final condition of the trees. Tree values are often used to establish a benchmark amount to fine the contractor if non-compliance with the Tree Protection Specifications or other negligence causes a subject tree to be removed or unnecessarily damaged. The full value amount should be charged to the contractor if a tree is damaged to the degree that it must be removed. A portion of the value of the tree plus any necessary remediation costs, as determined by the tree owner, should be charged to the contractor if the tree is damaged but does not have to be removed. 19. Action (Disposition): Save Remove (based upon tree condition, preservation suitability, expected impact of construction, poor species for the site or any combination of these factors). Transplant (another option for a tree that can be moved to another area of the site, particularly smaller trees in good condition) Needs Further Evaluation: (the tree requires additional, more detailed evaluations that are not a part of the scope of work for the tree survey and Arborist Report. Such evaluations may include root collar excavations and examinations, drill tests to look for decay, aerial inspections of the tree which must be done by a qualified tree service tree climber), or interior imaging studies of the tree such as sonic or electric tomography, sampling of soil or plant tissue and analysis/diagnosis by a soil or plant pathology laboratory) Debatable (the arborist feels that there are good arguments for either retaining or removing the tree). Uncertain (may be used when the arborist is unsure of condition of the tree, the expected construction impact or other factors) 20. Reason (for tree removal or to explain why a tree is listed as "Debatable" or "Uncertain"). Multiple reasons may be provided, with the most significant reason listed first. Reasons can include but are not limited to: Construction (excessive construction impact is unavoidable and it is not worthwhile to try and save the tree) Condition (e.g. poor tree condition — either vigor, structure or both) Species (the tree is a poor species for the use of the site) Risk (the tree presents excessive risk to people or property that cannot be sufficiently mitigated) 21. Notes: This may include any other information that would be helpful to the client and their architects and contractors within the scope of work for this report, such as a more detailed explanation of tree condition or expected construction impact. When reasonable, methods of reducing construction impact (including design changes) are presented. PO Box 3714, Saratoga, CA 95070. 408-725-1357, decah@pacbell.net, http://www.decah.com. Arborist Report for St. Mary's Parish. May 1, 2012. Page 31 of 40 Deborah Ellis, MS Consulting Arborist & Horticulturis 22. Tree Protection Distances (See pages 35-36. r N Sero ce since 198=1 Root Protection: 3 and 5xDBH: Both the 3 and 5xDBH distances are listed for each tree. For multi -trunk trees 100% of the DBH of the largest trunk is added to 50% of the DBH for all other trunks in order to compute the operational DBH to use for these the Tree Protection Distance calculations. OTPZ (Optimum Tree Protection Zone): This is calculated as per the text, Trees & Development, Matheny et al., International Society of Arboriculture, 1998. This method takes into account tree age and the particular tree species tolerance of root disturbance. Because it may not be possible to maintain the OPTZ distance recommended for trees on many projects due to crowded site conditions, the Arborist may omit this requirement and list only the 3 and 5xDBH distances. Canopy Protection: Additional space beyond root zone protection distances may be necessary for canopy protection. GLOSSARY 1. Canker: an area of dead bark. A localized lesion on a stem or branch, often sunken in appearance, commonly associated with a wound, decay or death of internal tissues. Cankers often extend beyond the extent of an original infection or wound, killing surrounding previously healthy tissue. If decay is present and spreads into the wood, a very weak area is created because both the inner and outer growth rings are affected. Internal decay can sometimes spread outward killing bark and new wood tissue — this is also called a canker rot. 2. Chlorosis/chlorotic: chlorosis is a plant symptom exhibited abnormally yellow colored foliage. Such foliage is described as chlorotic. This symptom can have many causes such as lack nutrients, diseases or high soil salinity. 3. Circlinq roots encircle all or a portion of the trunk of a tree or shrub at or close to the ground. If they begin to inhibit the flow of water and nutrients by "choking" vascular elements in the trunk or other roots, they become "girdling" roots. Girdling roots can cause whole -tree failures at the root collar. 4. Clear trunk height (of palms): is measured from the soil level (base of the trunk) to the base of the live fronds. This is the height that is normally used when measuring, appraising, purchasing and describing palms. "Overall Height" is the height of the base of the trunk to the height of the uppermost point of the highest frond. 5. Crooks are unnatural bends or sharp angles in branches or trunks caused by the removal of other attached branches or trunks; often with a vertical growing side branch at the end. This concentrates weight at the end of the branch, and also over some inevitable decay from a pruning wound. 6. Grove: is a group of trees that located close together that shelter each other from wind and the elements, having "knit" canopies. If of the same species, there is usually root grafting between trees, which lends support from the ground, as well as water and mineral sharing. Removal of one or some grove members could cause remaining members to be unstable due to a reduction of previous shelter. Grove trees often have asymmetrical canopies when viewed as individuals. 7. Leader: the orimary terminal shoot or trunk of a tree. PO Box 3714, Saratoga, CA 95070. 408-725-1357. decah@pacbell.net. http://www.decoh.com. Arborist Report for St. Mary's Parish, May 1, 2012. Page 32 of 40 Deborah Ellis, MS Consulting Arborist &Horticulturist 41 Service since 19s4 8. Stump sprout trees are the result of a tree trunk being cut down to a short stump close to the ground. If the tree survives, it sends out many small shoots (suckers) from around the cut stump. Some of these suckers may survive and grow to become significant trunks. These trunks are spaced very close together and usually have included bark between them, which reduces the strength of their union. Such trunks are prone to failure. Stump sprout trees can be very structurally unsound, particularly as they become large and old. There is often a great deal of decay associated with the mother stump, which can also reduce mechanical stability. 9. Suckers are secondary upright shoots arising from the roots or root collar (junction between roots and trunk) of a tree, or below the graft union. On a grafted tree the suckers (originating from the stock which includes the roots), are often not the same plant species as the scion (the grafted, desirable aboveground part). Suckers can be a nuisance in landscape situations. In nature however, suckers can serve to keep a tree alive after fire or mechanical damage that kills or removes the aboveground part of the tree. 10. Sunscald is the death of bark, and sometimes the underlying wood, due to the heat of the sun. This often occurs when over -pruning removes a large amount of foliage, newly exposing previously sheltered tissue. 11. Topping is the practice of indiscriminately cutting back large diameter branches of a mature tree to some predetermined lower height; to reduce the overall height of the tree. Cuts are made to buds, stubs or lateral branches not large enough to assume the terminal role. Reputable arborists no longer recommend topping because it is a particularly destructive pruning practice. It is stressful to mature trees and may result in reduced vigor, decline and even death of trees. In addition, branches that regrow from topping cuts are weakly attached to the tree and are in danger of splitting out. Large topping cuts may have significant decay associated with them, which weakens the branch as well as the attachment of any secondary branches attached nearby. Topping is useful however, for immediately reducing the risk of a very hazardous tree that will soon be removed. 12. Verticilliurn wilt is a vascular disease caused by a common soil -borne fungus that infects and plugs the water conducting system of plants. Plants infected with Verticillium do not necessarily die, but branches or sections of the plant may die. Plants often recover as they grow new water conducting tissue in new places. This fungus commonly infects maples, ash and certain other plants including some vegetables. The best management in landscape situations is generally to maintain good plant vigor by providing good growing conditions, and to avoid moving contaminated soil to pathogen -free areas. Verticillium wilt tends to be more serious in cooler areas — the fungus dies out in the branches of some woody hosts during hot summer weather. Soil solarization has been used with some success in reducing Verticillium inoculum in the soil especially for annual crops like vegetables), but moist soil must be covered with black plastic for 3 months during the hottest part of summer usually June — September) in order to be effective. If there are existing plant roots in the area, these plants could be damaged by the increase in soil temperatures. PO Box 3714, Saratoga, CA 95070. 408-725-1357. decah@pacbell.net, http://www.decah.com. Arborist Report for St. Mary's Parish. May 1, 2012. Page 33 of 40 Deborah Ellis, MS Consulting Arborist & Horticulturis SUPPORTING INFORMATION Service since 19&1 PURPOSE & USE OF REPORT This survey and report was required by the Town of Los Gatos as a part of the building permit process for this project. The purpose of the report is to identify and describe the existing protected trees on site - - their size, condition and suitability for preservation. The audience for this report is the property owner, developer, project architects and contractors, and Town of Los Gatos authorities concerned with tree preservation and tree removal. The goal of this report is to preserve the existing protected trees on site that are in acceptable condition, are good species for the area and will fit in well with the proposed new use of the site. METHODOLOGY I performed a brief ground evaluation' of the subject trees on April 5, 2012. Tree characteristics such as form, weight distribution, foliage color and density, wounds and indicators of decay were noted. Surrounding site conditions were also observed. Evaluation procedures were taken from: Quide for Plant Appraisal, 9th edition, 2000, authored by the Council of Tree and Landscape Appraisers (CTLA) and published by the International Society of Arboriculture (ISA). Species Classification and Group Assigninent published by the Western Chapter of the International Society of Arboriculture (WCISA), 1992. Tree Hazard Evaluation Form taken from Evaluation of Hazard Trees in Urban Areas, 2"d Ed., Matheny & Clark, International Society of Arboriculture, 1994. The above three references serve as industry professional standards for tree and landscape evaluations. Each of the trees was tagged in the field with metal number tags that correspond with the tree numbers referenced in this report and on the Tree Maps. I measured the trunk diameter of each tree with a diameter tape at 3 feet above the ground. Trunk diameter was rounded to the nearest inch. Trunk diameter at 3 feet was extrapolated to DBH (trunk diameter at 4.5 feet), which is used to calculate the Tree Protection Distances (for roots) that are listed in the Complete Tree Table. I estimated the tree's height and canopy spread. 4 Brief Ground Evaluation of Trees: A visual evaluation of the tree from the ground, without climbing into the tree or performing detailed tests such as extensive digging, boring or removing samples. This is an initial screening of the tree after which the evaluator may recommend that additional, more detailed examinations) be performed. I PO Box 3714, Saratoga, CA 95070. 408-725-1357. decah@pacbell.net, http://www.decoh.coin. ( Arborist Report for St. Mary's Parish. May 1, 2012. Page 34 of 40 Deborah Ellis, MS Consulting Arborist & Horticulturist Sercice since I QS4 Tree Condition (structure and vigor) was evaluated and I also recorded additional notes for trees when significant. Tree species and condition considered in combination with the current or (if applicable) proposed use of the site yields the Tree Preservation Suitability rating. The more significant trees (or groups of trees) were photographed with a digital camera. Some of these photos are included in this report, but all photos are available from me by email if requested. OBSERVATIONS SITE CONDITIONS The site is an existing elementary and junior high school, church and rectory. Site topography is mainly level. Much of the site is beautifully landscaped and well maintained. Most of the landscape plants are not native to the immediate area, although some of the trees (e.g. coast live oaks) are native to the immediate area and are probably of natural growth (they were not planted). Most landscape areas appear to be irrigated. Sun exposure for the trees varies from full to partly shaded, depending upon proximity to existing buildings and to other trees. TREE PROTECTION DISTANCES 3TO5XDBH No one can estimate and predict with absolute certainty how far a soil disturbance such as an excavation must be from the edge of the trunk of an individual tree to affect tree stability or health at a low, moderate or severe degree -- there are simply too many variable involved that we cannot see or anticipate. 3xDBH however, is a reasonable "rule of thumb" minimum distance (in feet) any excavation should be from the edge of the trunk on one side of the trunk. This is supported by several separate research studies including (Smiley, Fraedrich, & Hendrickson 2002, Bartlett Tree Research Laboratories. DBHis trunk "diameter at breast height" (4.5 feet above the ground). This distance is often used during the design and planning phases of a construction project in order to estimate root damage to a tree due to the proposed construction. It tends to correlate reasonably well with the zone of rapid taper, which is the area in which the large buttress roots (main support roots close to the trunk) rapidly decrease in diameter with increasing distance from the trunk. For example, using the 3X DBH guideline an excavation should be no closer than 4.5 feet from the trunk of an 18-inch DBH tree. Such distances are guidelines only, and should be increased for trees with heavy canopies, significant leans, decay, structural problems, etc, It is also important to understand that in actual field conditions we often find that much less root damage occurs than was anticipated by the guidelines. 3xDBH may be more of an aid in preserving tree stability and not necessarily long-term tree health. 5X DBH or greater is the "preferred" minimum distance which should be PO Box 3714, Saratoga, CA 95070. 408-725-1357, decah@pacbell.net. http://www.decoh.com. Arborist Report for St. Mary's Parish. May 1, 2012. Page 35 of 40 Deborah Ellis, MS Consulting Arborist & Horticulturisl Service wire 19S4 strived for, and this distance or greater should probably be used when there are multiple trenches on more than one side of the trunk. The roots beyond the zone of rapid taper form an extensive network of long, rope -like roots one to two inches in diameter. These woody perennial roots are referred to as transport roots because they function primarily to transport water and minerals. Maintaining a 5xDBH tree protection zone or greater around a tree will preserve more of these transport roots, which will have less of an impact on tree health than if the excavation were closer to the trunk. OTPZ (OPTIMUM TREE PROTECTION ZONE) OTPZ is the distance in feet from the trunk of the tree, all around the tree, that construction or other disturbance should not encroach within. If this zone is respected, then chances of the tree surviving construction disturbance are very good. This method takes into account tree age and the particular species tolerance to root disturbance. Although there are no scientifically based methods to determine the minimum distance for construction (for example, root severance) from trees to assure their survival and stability, there are some guidelines that are often used in the arboricultural industry. The most current guideline comes from the text, Trees & Development, Matheny et al., International Society of Arboriculture, 1998. The tree protection zone calculation method in this text was used to obtain the OTPZ's provided in this report. Due to the crowded, constrained nature of many building sites it is often not be possible to maintain the OPTZ distance recommended for many of the trees -- therefore I have also listed alternate distances of 3 and 5X D BH (see paragraph above). PO Box 3714, Saratoga, CA 95070. 408-725-1357. decah@pacbell.net. http://www.decoh.com. Arborist {report for St. Mary's Parish. May 1, 2012. Page 36 of 40 Deborah Ellis, MS Consulting Arborist & Horticulturisl Seroice since 1984 LOS GATOS GENERAL TREE PROTECTION DIRECTIONS Note that the following is excerpted from Division 2 (free Protection) of the Los Gatos Town Code and does not constitute the complete Division 2 text. The owner/applicant is responsible for implementing all pertinent requirements of the Code relative to tree protection. Sec. 29.10.1000 New Property Development The final approved Tree Preservation Report shall be included in the building permit set of development plans and printed on a sheets titled: Tree Preservation Instruction (Sheet T-1, T-2, etc.). These Sheets shall be referenced on all relevant sheets (civil, demolition, utility, landscape, irrigation) where tree impacts from improvements may be shown to occur. 3 b.) The site or landscape plans shall indicate which trees are to be removed However, the plans do not constitute approval to remove a tree until a separate permit is granted The property owner or applicant shall obtain a protected tree removal permit, as outlined in section 29.10.0980 for each tree to be removed to satisfy the purpose of this definition. 3.e.) Protective fencing inspection: Prior to issuance of any demolition, grading or building permit, the applicant or contractor shall submit to the building department a written statement verifying that the required tree protection fence is installed around street trees and protected trees in accordance with the Tree Preservation Report. 3 qj An applicant with a proposed development which requires underground utilities shall avoid the installation of said uiil_ities within the dripline of existing trees whenever possible. In the event that this is unavoidable, all trenching shall be done using directional boring, air -spade excavation or by hand, taking extreme caution to avoid damage to the root structure. Work within the dripline of existing trees shall be supervised at all times by a certified or consulting arborist. Section 29.10.1005 Protection of Trees During Construction a) Protective tree fencing shall specify the following: 1) Size and materials: A five (5) or six (6) foot high chain link fencing, mounted on two-inch diameter galvanized iron posts, shall be driven into the ground to a depth of at least two (2) feet at no more than 10-foot spacing. For paving area that will not be demolished and when stipulated in a tree preservation plan, posts may be supported by a concrete base. 2) Area type to be fenced. Type I: Enclosure with chain link fencing of either the entire dripline area or at the tree protection zone TPZ), when specified by a certified or consulting arborist. Type II: Enclosure for street trees located in a planter strip: chain link fence PO Box 3714, Saratoga, CA 95070. 408-725-1357. decah@pacbell.net. http://www.decoh.com. Arborist Report for St. Mary's Parish. May 1, 2012. Page 37 of 40 Deborah Ellis, MS Consulting Arborist & Horticulturis Service Shia" 198-1 around the entire planter strip to the outer branches. Type III: Protection for a tree located in a small planter cutout only (such as downtown): orange plastic fencing shall be wrapped around the trunk from the ground to the first branch with 2-inch wooden boards bound securely on the outside. Caution shall be used to avoid damaging any bark or branches. 3) Duration of Type I, II, III fencing. Fencing shall be erected before demolition, grading or construction begins and remain in place until final landscaping is required. Contractor shall first obtain the approval of the project arborist on record prior to removing a free protection fence. 4) Warning sign. Each tree fence shall have prominently displayed an 8.5 x 1 1-inch sign stating: "Warning —Tree Protection Zone -this fence shall not be removed and is subject to penalty according to Town Code 29.10.1025". b) All persons shall comply with the following precautions: 1) Prior to the commencement of construction, install the fence at the dripline, or tree protection zone (TPZ) when specified in an approved arborist report, around any tree and/or vegetation to be retained which could be affected by the construction and prohibit any storage of construction materials or other materials or vehicles inside the fence. The dripline shall not be altered in any way so as to increase the encroachment of the construction. 2) Prohibit excavation, grading, drainage and leveling within the dripline of the tree unless approved by the director. 3) Prohibit disposal or depositing of oil, gasoline, chemicals or other harmful materials within the dripline of or in drainage channels, swales or areas that may lead to the dripline of a protected tree 4) Prohibit the attachment of wires, signs or ropes to any protected tree. 5) Design utility services and irrigation lines to be located outside of the dripline when feasible. 6) Retain the services of the certified or consulting arborist for periodic monitoring of the project site and the health of those trees to be preserved. The certified or consulting arborist shall be present whenever activities occur that pose a potential threat to the health of the trees to be preserved. 7) The director and project arborist shall be notified of any damage that occurs to a protected tree during construction so that proper treatment may be administered. Section 29.10.1010 Pruning and Maintenance All pruning of protected trees shall be consistent with the current edition of Best Management Practices - Tree Pruning, established by the International Society of Arboriculture (ISA) and any special conditions as determined by the Director. For developments, which require a tree preservation report, a certified or consulting arborist shall be in reasonable charge of all activities involving protected trees including cabling, and fertilizing if specified. PO Box 3714, Saratoga, CA 95070. 408-725-1357. decah@pacbell.net, http://www.decoh.com. Arborist Report for St. Mary's Parish. May 1, 2012. Page 38 of 40 Deborah Ellis, MS Consulting Arborist & Horticulturist Service since 19&1 1. Any public utility installing or maintaining any overhead wires or underground pies or conduits in the vicinity of a protected tree shall obtain permission from the Director before performing any work, including pruning, which may cause injury to a protected tree (e.g. cable TV/fiber optic trenching, gas, water, sewer trench, etc.) 2. Pruning for clearance of utility lines and energized conductors shall be performed in compliance with the current version of the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) A300 (Part 1) - Pruning, Section 5.9 Utility Pruning. Using spikes or gaffs when pruning is prohibited. ASSUMPTIONS & LIMITATIONS 1) Tree locations were provided by Kier & Wright Civil Engineers and are shown on the Tree Maps on pages 1 and 2 of this report. The tree maps are a reduced partial copy of the East and West Site Plans that I was given. Tree locations are assumed to be accurate but should be verified in the field. 2) Trees on neighboring properties were not evaluated. They were only viewed cursorily from the project site. I did not enter the neighboring property to inspect these trees up close. 3) The measures noted within this report are designed to assist in the protection and preservation of the trees mentioned herein, should some or all of those trees remain, and to help in their short and long term health and longevity. This is not however; a guarantee that any of these trees may not suddenly or eventually decline, fail, or die, for whatever reason. Because a significant portion of a tree's roots are usually far beyond its dri Iinel, even trees that are well protected during construction often decline, fail or die. Because there may be hidden defects within the root system, trunk or branches of trees, it is possible that trees with no obvious defects can be subject to failure without warning. The current state of arboricultural science does not guarantee the accurate detection and prediction of tree defects and the risks associated with trees. There will always be some level of risk associated with trees, particularly large trees. It is impossible to guarantee the safety of any tree. Trees are unpredictable. s Dripline: the area under the total branch spread of the tree, all around the tree. Although tree roots may extend out 2 to 3 times the radius of the dripline, a great concentration of active roots is often in the soil directly beneath this area. PO Box 3714, Saratoga, CA 95070. 408-725-1357. decah@pacbell.net. http://www.decoh.com. Arborist Report for St. Mary's Parish. May 1, 2012. Page 39 of.10 Deborah Ellis, MS Consulting Arborist & Horticulturist 4) Loss or alteration of any part of this report invalidates the entire report. Nervice since 198.1 5) Unless expressed otherwise: a) Information contained in this report covers only those items that were examined and reflects the condition of those items at the time of inspection. b) The inspection is limited to visual examination of accessible items without dissection, excavation, probing or coring. There is no warranty or guarantee, expressed or implied, that problems or deficiencies of the plants or property in question may not arise in the future. I certify that the information contained in this report is correct to the best of my knowledge, and that this report was prepared in good faith. Thank you for the opportunity to provide service again. Please call me if you have questions or if I can be of further assistance. Sincerely, Worah Effs Deborah Ellis, MS. Consulting Arborist & Horticulturist Certified Professional Horticulturist 4130022 ASCA Registered Consulting Arborist P305 I.S.A. Board Certified Master Arborist WE-457B PO Box 3714, Saratoga, CA 95070. 408-725-1357. decah@pacbell.net, http://www.decoh.com. Arborist Report for St. Mary's Parish. May 1, 2012. Page 40 of 40 z RoMPN oTdcuc r-4t r ar spo jo-zw JBR - r=l 514Hvmtr-> t5r, HNier-5 32 26175 Aal", 4 LL1 4r f OfOEM> 11b -Mlpf LLJ 00 Ui tffl5^" LL Ui U=1-15r/w3 WV11461 IE>'FY., all Aim P No TEA-- LLVIW-4AgElal- I to or— 19 1 410— Y r r- X — - — X O j`CEg g ' DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT This project calls for the demolition of a concrete and wood structure and the construction of a new two story wood frame house.All pertinent data and information are reflected on these lot attached pages of drawings. 6 r AM" 3AV znko VINV 8 .`,, ,® IIIo^ e b iO O e: II 0 ' Fill Iffilim Ikl. fll IKVWP1'®' ' EI'11111 NI =11111§1rrlorTTZ-101 WIL- Or- iz 0WtLro 0A MAI-I C)F-AM t&,\4 r=: NIL) 5- 157 tz e e T e, -6, A r r-- Loo ING N 0 P- T H TYP. NEW BATH NOTES II - 1. PROVIDE PRESSURE BALANCE VALVES TOi1BBHOY.fL SHOWERS ARIDRR 1 SHOWERS SHALL BE FINISHED TO MIN. 1....., a...•........._.....«.._—-._ Y". 1 o11 1 1- , y, j!i.f • p HGT OF TOR ABOVES DRAIN INLET .. STRUCiED OF WALLSASMOOTH, HABERD NON• ABSORSIENT S A E.G. CERAMICTILEORFIBERGLASS) OVER A M0¢ T ERESISTANTENT SUCH AS WATER-RESISTANT . GYP. BD. PRIM7TItD) ON3. PROWOE WATER RESISTANT GYP-8LOCATIONSFINISHNOTESATALLWETLOCATIONS FLOORS BE T TR NLESS MD ` I LU o Plastic laminated, simulated wood floors thru-out, typ., uno. 2 I n O ` 1 Q pt ; I : 1 ' i Fi ry 0 !"i 4r 4. SHOWER E L Stairs to have carpet runner. , - 1 U CABINETS I m Paint grade cabinets, typ uno. c; , cu l._ VENT DRYER TO 0.10510E PER t- { DRAFT DAMPER 'MINATETER COUNTER TOPS I I AWAY FROM a DG OPENrs Granite file in kitchen. - Ceramic tile in baths. Ic o U HARDWARE s °gs 3o YYY sNN1r=Mfz-rAF.LINIr. VzS — - Cabinets: oil rubbed bronze. 9 ito orb t+rWsS To s " Passage doors : oil rubbed bronze by Emtek or equal. v I a w t ," ' 01 e LLt CEILINGS I L --- W75 ti lv 2g7B — --- w' ,°I g3a Provide 'Quiet Board' or gypsum board on resilient channels - ; I ey #" at all Main Level ceilings. . E=^pi pj -- ?icn8 suewes- IG/19i:t s5 s f 1'Gk TS PLUMBING to ut ," o,l; . 4 r Kohler or owner approved equal. { P"F `- - Ru 1 _ ( T 11 C133cI WP1a. F4i 1 10 ' APPLIANCES i -. ti-- =be -&T '.[7TD1P iiJw pool I I I ° -( Pavv tx+^S P51Z Dn I/ GE orKitchenaid. Gas cooktop with electric oven.—S- j - r ?/AAh•-€"e 3<s.E IR.Ue14SA94F .... _ tr t m I 4VIP p'Z• rZ ID LL . q. .j G 7 S^9 Q Ia _ 3 st*K r/vN 71bNF T Ins 04 Ar DEN"_!- ONS "7 '?I.10" 5l';T: i'•to ° I , • RI= 7`/lA . w..._ _h?'•_d--'___...__._. '°6` ;iT " 41•at". ?'7"; '•7" I'''1r o)-1=?.." _ ._..... -- ice'-° _— E , cN 2x o(ZrRc%wYru ,utJO .. _.. _. .... n' f {(f2i1• INTi'{.t ilAla•L1yUND - STAIR AND GUARDRAIL CONSTRUCTION: SPECIAL NOTES TO OWNER ' l - SIDE DRAINAGE 1.) COMPLY Wl CBC SECT041009 AND 1013. ALL pRNNADEfACAN1E5 SHOULD SE DAIGENILYNARTNNEO WRING--. 11-- 3.) PROVIDE.GWPPABLE NAVORALL PEROETAABEL04Y THE LIFE OF THE STRUCTURE-ORELTN6 SURFACE AND 1 PROVIOE34-TO3 GUARDRAIL ATOPENSIDE OF STAIRWAYWINTERMEMTE SUESURFACE WATERS AWAY FROMTHEBVRDINGTO ENSURE THAT RAYS CKETS SPACED SUCH THAT A SPHERE OF 43R- CANNOT PASS THRU. THE FDUNDATIONE WLL NOT BE AVJERIC, AFFECTED BY SOON PROVIDE 4T GUARDRAIL$ AT UPPER LEVEL FLOOR WHERE THE FLOOR .:, WATER AND IN ADDITION. TO PREVENT WATER-RITAWION INTO THE BELOW I$ GREATER THAN W BELOW INTERMEDIATE RAILSPIMM SWILL 'BUA0INO. THIS IS PARTCUUARLY IMPORTANT DURIND PRNODS OF,' i BE SPACEDSLrHTHATA a SPHERE- CANNOT PASS THRU. PROLONGED ANO INTENSE RNNFALI, 43 CONTRACTORMCBCSECID3GUARDPAILDINr DRAWINGSANDCAPPROV LCONTRACTORSHALLSUSMITOTREBLALSHOP NS CONCRETE PREORTOCONSTRUCTNON EJ AMRISE -73V'; MW. TREAD -10. MIN. HEACRM-V-S•:MIN. WIDTH -Tr. TYP. UNDR NOPNACDNXT—AN.FM CONVEMION —L-N AND ' BI TTHE TREkD HE SMALLEST DEPTH NNRTHWANY FLIGHT OF STAIRS SHALL NOT EXCEED BURDI SUCH —HE NA a SYM HTHEGREA TOOwEER°OEN1'SNPoENa'bEEX - ARE ANYFLIGHTOF STAIRS SHALL NOT EXCEED THE SAMLLESTT BYRMORE THAN SIBTE4W 3RBNGH, ETE. . AND .i 7) SEE NOTE 0 STAIRS ON FLOOR PLANS FOR ACTUAL RISE AND RUN. EL19IGHTS T EfFECT THE WAUS AND ORE SERUCTURA Vv '.,/ L.+ VA/yy+-t....s / .-..,,..,•L"`-y. I L,..y/. N. . U-^", A EIHAFMT6 OVJNMH THE BEAN55LAB6 AREjTNECRACKSARE TiEO ; IC I rjT•••/^ 1..G ( 'N•- 1^i W N-/'R Sn-t.• /i IT.a J•yl•i I' ITS SEVICNULIITY ANNDISSTTR GGTi' REOURM'ENTSITITES PGWSU, CONTRACTOR G BD STAIRPERSE YWTZBy SIGNS ARCHITECTON THE -THATA OF HNEA E CRACI(E, WH L A S NOR Y 17EAAAATIWASHALLTOVRINAWIDTIEXCEEDING0tt(N RICK IT IS EMPHASIZED THAT ' ARCINfEPRIORFLOORPLANS. ANY APPROVED 'D¢ WRX A 6 M ANCt i / FW DI{"• •"•' ' "' T'-TZ-- CONSTRUCTIDH ATNg1CN SPEDW. E . IS MADE TO R E TEE POTEMWLPROVIDE - 1 / CAUSER AND NUMBER OF SUCH CRACkS. r IS NOT PRACTICAI. TO A 24 Iii.IM. SPAr.E(MIU.) ISuraTuNo'T ETMCa eBN1oSYK r•" /,(/ i 1 // -n MOST 6UCM DW+GK4 DEVE10P 0.•ER THE FlRBTTWDVEMEOFTHE HANDRAIL LIFE OF THE FLDOA SCAB Bv$tEM CRAC 3 THAT AREWIOER THAN DATE 1 /// ... .. 0.011NCH NMY NEEDTO BEPRESWRE IX"OXIED. MCTAL BRACKET DRAWN i x THE OBJECT Of THE J TS PROVIDED 18 TO A EE LgVFl1ENi. MOVEMENTDUETDCREEPNOfiHWNNNENAYNDTBENOTCEAELEBLOGKIMB A4NBCM, mwEk- DUE TO Nei T6-'1RKTUuO. -i` DESIST. BIAS CK HANDRAILTOBE34•TO 38•ABOVE TREAD NOSINGS AND EXTEND CONTINUOUSLY FROM TOP TO IUTEiJIOp HUISU EXPANSION AND CONTRACTION glp SgT• BOTTOM OF STAIRS AND TERMINATE WALL - — NEWEL POSTS OR RETURN TO THEEFFECTSa NORMALEXPANSION AND comwcTaN cnHBE COflST SE7 N I`T('°`%JJ WALLS. CBG100B.104kio1. DRrWAUU., C"EEMENTINPASER AND PSMALL CNHr"-IE%cEC—Y WHERE SHE.J Jj p 1 TI„^ -, tail 0 .. ..... ... ...... ...: THEE TU INMIABLE. VLDINGSR1. WMRNOTX-SLECWO.W'TRt WN I _1 YEAR FOLLON9NG COMP li dF} Itaww NG BUT TYPIGJLY GOMNUEB INTO THE SECOND )F R THem CONSTRUCTION NSTTRU TCIOND8 LFXPTANSeDN ANO CONTW.0 Wes! TO I S Za- pKK : 2 l_.^Ft b cR 71er' "C16 M1XWD • Cd°J`. f,I7.".. L'r1'FG:3wcJhP3W6AG ._ - (D'i - I'T'.„ L•IL;iI' -_-_. ,r _.___— y-'pU - 7' , r7 Q j.,p it i3°G ZIr P a8'S°O GFfM+*u=es.v+rar prleAre v.a - - - Z Kes wegale INe?,o'• ^/:Rj'+ i f G .C..yp•..`'.T iy Pr " I-'_W/ _ _. ltrrtrti 51oNE - :7;'7 _ —:. _._ _ ..._. _ .. PEUPfI'Itl0 0 TV 24'3DF' IIDt:: wr t/ /' 79 2jt3 Glu'QeD LONGY$TL- 4 ° ` 2s 02d0G1- tjui26C)p 11G F[nai.nfweoxvanmrrNetswsi j i + 4 •S t, 14" I fl°ram. 4 r' G • G - ._ -- _- _ - -. 01 to 2 . L I 25, >r aui t 1 6PI(a0 t5 fa" µ ` F[rX T T N e - ram-___ _ ._ _ . __ ..._ :_._—. r \ r__ •— - y9ERU os uLLr[ Lrjpi.n n , _ .. Vl._. __ 2It'.7p` — I>!t I /Isalkar _ = s . a+LT IN I's, 5erc I v I n off° N C M« ww- IN5' p fl SZ9'aG.3'J°f'..203bG _ I W gd I 03Pnlil1-7 0 • D' -' r• NaT -.... `% 034. R Nvr E La3' tDeliN• Ir jP G•50fP•p3°G .{7 .I :. lC G 5 e. WOOveNrwirea*ooursioEPER bE, ORAPT DAMPEN. TERMINATE q ....,t. 1._._ Y_ ._.._. •WWS' V' 3-0'AWAY FROM BLOD OGEN GS. 9, i 12" v '.$' rrrrt _....--- i'•( o" ti18aGt• b}6 I :- 9 i hV 14 13 -• MECHANICAL! PLUMBING NOTES: Nffl tRJy/ 9 iD Bc /K VM. G f7 1 1fl•W 1 t?P341UM 3+f Ul I Aid, K' ell SiWNfoT2i' f:EY HOTFY¢+tA•lF iv':ltFi. ('.D%tIlC.TDOL__.._ ' U WdDC`F'PA-.- f C`AG C%_7IOhtzE Nj°'p- `'v - u e 5 a 7 6- I-- . - ^ c°U«+r Kra swru rNcucuunoeisro euaor+c`asEciu n N1P sr STY• N G'AL7r 2, s-`-' iwI" 7,5 N5 w/r n a> v a. s m s2:ajop , ;,• t raTwAreRrahK _ ventr sttSTo fltf tcAfrl1 .. i Ot"• 7 _- - F t F-°-{eia7zrl:. - QW y°/'/'P - ^" r'`r.',• W(eyITTVWUS MeM Gout)! "gyp 1" { _ _ I.... { _ s. etinRom xrAL , vR Duns wR,.us nuuwsrF,urs; Musr i Nam I-•. YJ ("'•'` • ; _ TEWIYIAtE Y0 N . FROM OPENIWG MRO BU lLB1[S r7• V'f^ IP'(Gl`(c..s O elyR 1(dQ.JS W%f+E'1'i1 Y:u _ - i. Lr. - T-1 _- a aRessfne nesor sOOFwc v aRA=vao,..o cnnwcuoes s 11t °R`°1^^°" 20TER. w s.L°c" u.:.r seAs aossrel To auc,tAcruw;wLves, Tw,r ,uAssamNNafaaFssxaERaoLrwo 1-'(U-MOi` CttLF U`LIT•S Y G•'/+WI' tl"Flhl lQje `•Q:/+Q.C. = _. °`7'LLo'fa'&'i'EBDW s au urm,3eFLaoanueedracfF.wwrssw,u tE wrxwmrc. of W'( yO' *!y W/-7( j i s'"EiRurn.ReaooR.cress oa amaocamrne Ex,e+nao- _ rwT/ l-0r? TFxI^5!garmr iN eec {V p.iS •<- j ( c uEcwmw. RLa nac,Fucrarxum sc wnFFFE RAnos : v I i_ _ ' I ' MTEO RESIDEIPNL FIRE CNANLBE CFUU D'MM AN ASrM efb - _ T y,, I / , 6 Q44FPH09MLLif SiPPQiTEDP RCPC 121r t,. auo w i'%• i%" "r!.` i +.•61 G,'•" 111 _ ,,. ws aecFon,u:eu Fww seuueEswFenrsoR cvcr>a Qj meomewmm-____.___ -__ _ _ ___ _ ! •u_ ' Arn sEenoN sue \ CF: w•..eru:.m«: o< aa:w ;.. +a ,a se suFwarsnveRcaxrAazes as aRo ae am -_ nrru. r: auu. wut + wvuw %i•°vroo _ - ... t r mFu wRR>N wa. i _•c.:. ._ 1.. u xavuoor„EVRooF wrtssnvisevucmns - ms+w ' - .---__ __ _- _ _ POSLYPCOOPDNNTEwacNWARCNRE4T. I}. l: ma ovw w•w :. ; (J i/ l t J . I hJ(laf/% 11 a c•- pa,•, e Imo•.. ucvs,rr, . - ' irtiNLa•- 1 6LD ik.T C OC TYh"':/G2:}r1r+:1j fG 7'z" t IO° nibFi+Gti•NC OkIroTdE'^tr:.-M tYarT'/°C769I - l t/a n WTO w/ wav tN . it T f=",Sti FbT 1f3 P3Jdrswfp.. 17 yfp7 jIZ } 2T4" TN+CK ,P F1M( pdN® MA Y elA fit PfAD' 4' U I PL•:KEP OlL3 A3 • i I LCU= S Fz • I yyo c,s • I °i I • as-,+ , G r t dc+z+c au t vNlir c.WAQ DATE p14 12 s 5s Z, iF s IrKa gz ro rat. 3 2/p 3/,° g • FiAM CK K t`NOLiF( f? i Z>1' S P6 ,q v'Ul F L1-s 3/WO ' 1f4i' 1/• / 4FIT ser co .. I CxL.'=t EDNz tip pWPw-'•E itsr ssr I Q'm IMP-at- p0'•O" N 6#A • OLP6, H40 PLLPWOP f4WN Gi¢D NAi 2 H d-Tr' (P zroolp> r J z w U z q w it, 1s5 w 72 5s°y' LL HIM; ax a INI W 0 oAr rEagg9a_5 3 o x w99HM U`v g 5 3o3E LL m a O O a 1 10LKL071, O w U z w ry w H w ry ry O 1 0 F F I CE OF C 0 U N1 TY ASSESSOR S A N T A C L A R A C 0 U N TY, C A L I F 0 R N I A W a 18 W O1713 P. M. 561 -- M - 38/39 *L. BEAN AVENUE 0 In ' ti 'm P1/-3 8?.80 3790 21S •".l5 N - It g 50 1-71r20S.) 1 219.3 20 0 1 I I n 22 a 11{ I Qe n to 68 C3 88 w d 27 d 29 # vi 4 0l - 86.94 rn I 122.11 0: h 21 2 W I 49.90 , I+ 88. 26 ( 1Z o 20 28cc 30 N I — 9c - 0.95 Ac h 3.00 Ac 19 ` 4 PCL1 0 II 9 31 0wtQ PCL 2 18 fP14r 5 L 84 PTN. LOT 11 a I 4 5 N \ BOOK PAGE 510 44 ELM STREET 17+I 6 59 a N O BOOK 42-------rt-------- 32 529D Im167 155. 97 a t4. 90 C.LM. 19403604 11 n 15 8 N:... 157.42 AC{ R.O.S. 837117 ` .! 0.102 Ac. 16.93 0.7$ N N I S 99. ... ... - 21" --- 94 Cato92ee 9.`? _„ ,` loo ;s.s7 163• LLA. 15513461 I r 93 88 0 , . 6 .. m Ia. TQWN QF LOS GA .......... 0 a 0.10 AC.PLAN. 4 p .-. Z 21.59 CD b --- --- - c G7o 90 O 44 39 68W U bT.01___- t .1.54 Q92 --- U J 92 Ii lv `"0.105 A2CY N. Ie+ 83 . 55 Z o.s4 Ac Z Q PEIVNSYI-VANIA - - - = - - - 76 t! AVENUE o 8 1 7 N 79,,0 4 3 1' 9.89 — ` 0C 14 ---13 12 11 a15A. 3 N Q o o.2flAc : PCL 2 "- TowN of 37. Ileo 2 8fi ' / 1- .Bz LQS GAMS, o 77 I 1 Q4 1 r- m c• t7 2 ,i Z ti 11 - 79'° -- 2 69 C. s 5a v fI 12 ' `s 62 65 $ o RMEV. o cq AGENCY M c ' r PCL.ISi i 1 I l F- 30' 50 1 5c 80 30 50 1 50 { 50 50 48 ` 22 10 40 I 50 SG.tf 134.78 312 3/0 TOO 2461248 224 in t W. MAIN (FMLY.-HOTEL ST.) STREET - " P.M. 661—M-49 45 - -_ ------ - - I I J.W. LYNDON'S SUB. MA DU: WP." LAWRENCE E. STONE - ASSESSOR Cadastral map for assessment purposes only. Compiled under R. do T. Code, Sec. 327. Effective Roll Year 2011-2012 561°29'00'E FD. CHS)LD. PA RCEL MAPS28°31'00"W ,'(,/• 0.284' W n 0.217' 'f 928°3100'W u) FO.CHISELED 0.002' - Q Q „+„ S61°2900"E FOR THE MERGING OF 7 PARCELS AND A VACATEDBEANAVENUEPORTIONOFLYNDONAVENUEINTO2PARCELS. 1 FD. P.K. NAIL BASIS OF BEARINGS CONSISTING OF 2 SHEETS 42`' SCALE: V=40' BEING A PORTION OF THE LYNDON SUBDIVISION IN N.61°29'00"W 1028-51' / F°• P.K. NAIL THE TOWN OF LOS GATOS AS SHOWN UPON THAT MAP 287.18' — — _ _ _ _ RECORDED IN BOOK "A" OF MAPS AT PAGE 54 SANTA 412.66 T' CLARA COUNTY.RECORDS,WITHIN THE TOWN bF LOS t a= _ (SEEEENOTECORNER 396 DEEDS 170 - GATOS, SANTA CLARA COUNTY, CAU FORN IA Sol ^2a'00' 45271' 219. 58' 8.08 205.11' S28°31'00"W _ 7756 . 6'..- 1.59'-• 4990' 41.63ti__ '— — — OCTOBER 1985 I 9.39--•' p•2 E 7a.12 f00.S8 sea 3roo'w - i20&6 — N21 37' I 1 BASIS OF BEARINGS: 10.07' ' 3 SEWER t I P.S.S.E. EASM T 1250 OR 566 THE BEARING N61029 00"W FOR THE CENTERLINE OF BEAN AVENUE n I I I I o AS SHOWN ON THAT RECORD OF SURVEY FILED FOR RECORD ON OCTOBER24, 11- 1973 IN BOOK 331 OF MAPS AT PAGE 43, SANTA CLARA RECORDS,WAS USED AS I W l0 111 f THE BASIS OF BEARINGS FOR THIS MAP. PARCEL 1 t s I I ° 0.99 ACRES io BEARS LEGEND: N n 1 FEARS N 17Oa2 4 W 1 N61°29'00"w ml 49.90' I P.S. D.E. 1 75°27,'A'S 1692 ' w 1 I 1.._.-•sza"zoo W Z Qt I h N 6129'00"w 21. 50' 1 N 7 O spySET"+' IN CONCRETE- ' F•- W W LOT LINE ELIMINATED t 0 I Z BY THIS MAP (TYP). W o 5+" IN SIDEWALK 1 Q PARCEL 2 3. 00 ACRES t U 1. 04-0e E FETSIN CONCRETE 1 N cf) I c iS q I Je CO ttof @'p0 I o c' N 69° 3444 of 1 SET 't N CONCRETE f r, ,-N 20°I4'Q9 E t\J\::*, _.: , 32.19 25.00 15. 00 I; N 20025'16" E r 16.93' Ii-FL 4" I.P. L.S. 823 Q• 1 SETNAIL fl TAG IN PAVEMENT--= 6T64, IV ' °600 i. R e 30. 00' 6- o SET BRASS MONUMENT by a INCONCRETENamDAa t—ar— z ;.t ,,:• r,= 35°07 Lc 18.39 ate. I '1-- N81 04'OO M EAE7T ` t LOSFO. OPE 1 531 09 FD. 1-V2' I.P. I F.Q. 31, C I.P. L.S. #3295 N I l`" YjIJ N61° 0408 W 1.83' MAIN STREET P. S:D. E. P. S.S. E. PRIVATE STORM DRAINAGE EASEMENT PRIVATE SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT ASSESSOR' S PARCEL NUMBER . DISTINCTIVE BORDER LANE CENTERLINE PARCEL LINE r . EASEMENT LINE EXISTING PARCEL LINE O FOUND SURVEY POINT SET 3/4" IRON PIPE TAGGED R.C. E. 24,755 NOTES: L ALL DISTANCES AND DIMENSIONS AS STATED IN FEET AND DECIMALS THEREOF. 2. THE DISTINCTIVE BORDER UNE INDIbA7ES THE BOUNDARY OF LANDS SUBDIVIDED BY THIS MAP. THE TOTAL AREA " WITHIN THE DISTINCTIVE BOUNDARY IS 3,99 ACRES. 3. A SOILS REPORT ON THIS PROPERTY HAS BEEN PREPARED BY PETER. KALDVEER AND ASSOCIATES, INC. DATED JULY 3, 1985. ( FILE NO. K582-1 6, 07375) 4. EASTERLY CORNER OF THE PARCEL OF LAND DESCRIBED IN THE DEED TO THE ROMAN CATHOLIC ARCHBISHOP OF SAN FRANCISCO CALIFORNIA, A CORPORATION SOLE, RECORDED DECEMBER 9,1912, 1300K 396 DEEDS, PAGE 170. THE RECORD DISTANCE FROM THIS POINT TO THE EAST LINE OF TAIT AVENUE IS GIVEN AS 370 FEET (396 DEEDS 170) AND 371-91 FEET (8483 OR 285).A SEARCH OF THE RECORDS HAS UNCOVERED NO EVIDENCE OFA RECORD WIDTH FOR TAIT AVENUE, FOR THE 202.20 FEET IMMEDIATELY SOUTH OF THE SOUTH LINE OF BEAN STREET AS IT EXISTED ON DECEMBER 9,1912. THIS MAP SHOWS THE WESTERLY HALF OF TAIT AVENUE TO BE 20.00 FEET WIDE.THIS IS BASED ON THE CONSTRUCTED WIDTH OFTAITAVENUE AND THE DIMENSIONED LOTS SHOWN 014 THE MAPOF THE LYNDON SUBDIVISION(BOCKAOF_MAPS AT PAGE 54),WHICH LOTS ARE IMMEDIATELY SOUTHERLY OFTHE FIRST 202.20 FEET SOUTH OF BEAN STREET, FOR WHICH NO EVIDENCE OFA RECORDED WIDTH WAS DISCOVERED. SHEET 2 OF 2"SHEETS 3q nQ • OWNER'S CERTIFICATE WE HEREBY CERTIFY THAT WE ARE ALL OF THE PARTIES HAVING ANY RECORD TITLE INTEREST IN AND TO THE REAL PROPERTY SHOWN, WITHIN THE DISTINCTIVE BORDER LINE, ON THIS MAP, AND WE HEREBY CONSENT TO THE PREPARATION AND RECORDATION OF THIS MAP. OWNERS: THE ROMAN CATHOLIC WELFARE CORPORATION OF SAN JOSE, a Califor ort-Profit Religious Corporation BY: resident THE ROMAN CATHOLIC BISHOP OF SAN JOSE, a Califor Corporation Sole BY: STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ON ,BEFORE ME, THE UNDER 1GNED A NOTARY PU fI R TATE, PERSONALLY APPEARED rw' PERSONALLY f OWN TO ME OR PR D M HATISFAACTORY EYIDENgE) TO BE THE PERSQNS WHO CUTED THE WITHIN INSTRUMENT AS PRESIDENT AND SECRETARY, ON BEHALF OF, THE ROMAN CATHOLIC WELFARE CORP A [O OF SAN JOSE, A CALIFORNIA NON-PROFIT RELIGIOUS CORPORATION, THE CORPORATION THEREIN NAMED, AND ACKNOWLEDGED TO ME THAT SUCH CORPORATION EXECUTED THE WITHIN INSTRUMENT AS OWNER PURSUANT TO ITS BY-LAWS OR A RESOLUTION OF ITS BOARD OF DIRECTORS. WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL'%, y.yy.} SIGNATUREGD/SiMD.C` MY COMMISSION EXPIRES ON Q//f1. ' ppL OFFIC7ARI QTORIAUREENTENOTARY RVIAWTAMr camp994 i 183109 PARCEL MAY FOR THE MERGING OF 7 PARCELS AND A VACATED PORTION OF LYNDON AVCNUE INTO 2 PARCELS. CONSISTING OF 2 SHEETS BEING A PORTION OF THE LYNDON SUBDIVISION IN THE TOWN OF LOS GATOS AS SHOWN UPON THAT MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 'A' OF MAPS AT PAGE 54,SANTA CLARA COUNTY RECORDS, WITHIN THE TOWN OF LOS GATOS, SANTA CLARA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA. OCTOBER 1985 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF - I&M"421 ) ON BEFORE ME, THE UNDERSIGNED, A NOTARY PUBLI F15R SAID STATE, PERSONALLY APPEARED LLA(TO ME rPERSONALL ORPROVED M TSATISFACTORY EVIDENCE) TO BE THE PERSON WHO EXECUTED THE WITHIN INSTRUMENT AS THE ROMAN CATHOLIC BISHOP OF SAN JOSE, A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION SOLE, THE CORPORATION THEREIN NAMED, AND ACKNOWLEDGED TO ME THAT SUCH CORPORATION EXECUTED THE WITHIN INSTRUMENT AS OWNER PURSUANT TO ITS BY-LAWS OR A RESOLUTION OF ITS BOARD OF DIRECTORS. WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL OFFICIAL SEA'. SIGNATURE liA11M irri, MAUREENEIAINEARIENTE i1N/w l I NOTARY RU8U; . CALI OQ.YiA S1NTA r'.ARA _ LINTY MY COMMISSION EXPIRES ON / /q8 j h7 cpm. a pirm AUG Z2 1996 BASIS OF BEARINGS: THE BEARING H61' 29100"W FOR THE CENTERLINE OF BEAN AVENUE AS SHOWN ON THAT RECORD OF SURVEY FILED FOR RECORD ON OCTOBER 24, 1973, IN BOOK 331 OF MAPS AT PAGE 43, SANTA CLARA RECORDS, WAS USED AS THE BASIS OF BEARINGS FOR THIS MAP. ENGINEER'S CERTIFICATE THIS MAP WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTION AND WAS COMPILED FROM RECORD DATA AND IS BASED UPON A FIELD SURVEY IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SUBDIVISION MAP ACT AND LOCAL ORDINANCE AT THE REQUEST OF THE ROMAN CATHOLIC WELFARE CORPORATION OF SAN JOSE. I HEREBY STATE THAT THIS PARCEL MAP SUBSTANTIALLY CONFORMS TO THE APPROVED OR CONDITION A Y APPROVED TENTATIVE MAP, IF ANY, QK014>SO4" G RGE C EEG, R. NO. 24755 0. f(• L T c' COUNTY RECORDER' S CERTIFICATE FILE NO. FEE i a PAID FILED THIS / S DAY OF cJ ry 19 d-11 AT 3 .' / (p * A -./ P.M. IN BOOK SI! I OF MAPS, AT PAGES3f,3%. AT THE REQUEST OF CREEGAN tic D'ANGELO. LAURIE KANE, RECORDER BY E P. DEPUTY TOWN ENGINEER' S CERTIFICATE THIS MAP CONFORMS WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SUBDIVISION MAP ACT AND LOCATION ORDINANCES, AND FURTHER CERTIFIES, PURSUANT TO SECTION 66411.1 OF THE GOVERNMENT CODE THAT CERTAIN OFF -SITE AND ON -SITE IMPROVEMENTS ARE REQUIRED TO BE INSTALLED AS A CONDITION OF APPROVAL OF PROCEEDING NO. M-84-21, APPROVED BY THE TOWN OF LOS GATOS PLANNING COMMISSION ON JANUARY 23, 1985. DATED: R AL . ZAPF TOWN ENGINEER R. C.E. NO. 25156 SHEET I OF 2 SHEETS In MASONRY TOWN OF LOS GATOS New First Floor Plan 1 P A R K I N G L G T aeae slras Cl 0 0 z K Steinberg Architects SL Marys Parish 219 Bean Avenue Los Gato% CA. 95030 Steinberg Architects 60 Pierce Avenue San Jose, Calftada 07.232012 PLANNING RESPONSE 03 06.O 2012 PLANNING RESPONSE#2 03.142012 PLANNING RESPONSE#1 12.192013 PLANNING DEFT. SUBMRTAL KEY PLAN St. Mary's Parish And School Planned Development Zoning Application 219 Bean Avenue Los Gatos, CA 95030 Lower School New First Floor Plan PROJDATE' 0f OLH. OATS .1/8' 2012SCALE1/S'.1-0' PD-11-006 A5.O b L 3 o F111 , DEPARTMENT T rt SAN.rA CLARA f0V47Y 1Q'W' irx aR a e 4 Y1 1 iS DEVELOPMENTAL REVIEW COMMENTS Proposed Development Permit Tara-ne±v 13,365syp -f,xn hvc.slury pnvate!r. I ligh school Facility storing Private w;htal propettv.'I'hc prujedu'ould Ml Laval-domolition of vane r Jetirg sdmropol etrw:mree, and a aed ],2!JB scare fa t add!ta+n loanc+du:r wstity; sln!rnrnt Ala+ steudan'inew iw art#an cuV o!xd omdau dining area. Page aid also rates$ pn>postdnmvuvo-stray resttent and apt—, Iiu A— me iory academic st,uctures. ile nttess antCnnunant #7: Review of this Dearlopmcnlol pmpoant is limited lu srreptnbdiity its watt supply As they pertain to fire department operations, and shall not be eaustned as A subailule for foitnal plan review• to detemninrcompliance with adopted model codex. Prior to performing any worklhr appliranlxhail make applira in In, and receive form, the Building Department all applicable cons/md7on per llte. Caanmou P2 nor•c A2.0 and€rah the A--building(..)+—.1d be,.± rnnximtan :is leer in heiKht I g i#:Iso— a maximum heightn131.4 feel. Ihk: mug m m4beclarified. laDupant aces... ces.. ngui—te are be.ed, do part. un t e—i-Aan, height nI stnu.W ors. C'ommenle3: Fim.Appamtaa fEnginelAttc3s Roads Reyulmd: -(Fx!. on nuuim"" haddins heirht of 30fM ur has) r'..vrLee a'a•!•s nwduays vvidh a paved dl±vrntur sudoep a nunimumunuleswavrd width of 20 IeeL vrrtiuJ alwran ti a(73.feet6 inel+ex, minimum circulating turning roit,.$ of Sri feet oulmde and 23 feet irede, and n maxmum slope of 1 WC For henn1latiom guidelines mfpr to rim IkpartnenlStendard DeG'Is and Sprddcaticros;dxrel ,A . l.'FC Sa•C.:d)3 Comment 74: Fire lane Marking Required: provide marking for an mad%vw..< within die ormceL N3nrkings 51ralfbe tier Nat departmc!nl sia•dfrcalionn kh allabuns h 11 afu mn(< to 1 o,ahl Cx,v-mment Savtdni, and lire [kporiment S)vndard D.tr:Ls and 5p<w,tiwumvs A 6:Ci 1. 5tr.503 Commeol=S:Fire Sprinklers Required, + A) 2WliereRequired.Apprnvd aubmvafic sprinklrr systems in new buddings and existing buddhnn and strvtcturas chap be. uimadd in the lornnmhs ciesnib d m d! l, Section Orin Sections 90:3:L1 I nor aY)9 IB whichevir is the more resiridivr.Fcn the purpesta ai Ihi< Srstun, fi wAils used Wxp.rate lwildii jy.—shall be —reacted in aecnrduncawith the CaliWrnin.buiidingCdeand shallMu9thantnpanil-g.apenir ahona.An auWatnlirtrreapdnkltr $ystan„kail be provided d+xlughoutall new buildings and 9tnirmn!a. ran -._... LC:A a a _ 0i F Val I I-2a,Zat ._m. wow, !,aw maw ors+ L353 of Cemmella:] inv!rgn!em _ An'IalMur one uiv.mn V I'. athRt'S 1'ARCil1&SCIfIUL 21Y ileanM Witalvb laeasusnt wu.'a.a aramwro, wssisniai t:iWiaeon,# nnvg lire :....._.W__.__.__ .. ._...__.....-- r5. m, nw a Ck ..o:auy xt rC P;vemn DW . e:+e•o upOl Hw.9.iw. x4..e fits rJd ,tM.... FIRE IDI ARTNICN•T K! n t a rn CA 9kiC I F to Nor ••.4,in •:SVL., t,+hit .+ .c ,wM.nrl rwv. n 37'a4 DEVELOPMENTAL REVIEW COMMENTS E% eeptions: Croup A, R, F F, J. L M, 5 and IJ oeenpancy, buildings and structures that do net eened 1,000 square lean of building nhx:a aOd.that An nor lveatdm the Wildland-Urban filter fA-Fine Area. tNhemihepnn%vons of thiscndunquimthataInuldn•• I. portion thereof t'•eguiuped thrvughinri with an Automatic epnns section, in accnrdan a tit: 4thepnnuer.s a0be in<lalid throughout,n acmniance.Iill NITA 121 a. pt avvided in I.—ticm±kt3,:t'.1.1A and]neat standards. R, nest• buildirrgr. having nil depgnate3 use rx NnanL file minimum sprinkler dttign dcm,in•,hall h! Chdinary 11meard Croup Z 91? 21.J-ition, WI ill Oriped to hvdmru.s, d6vc m,% buildings and I.ndccaping. 110, dapArtmemamlxctiolr.l all d xo k.:nt d that fury al±lIrieratua andbuwcaim+cted tesupply flcsysltm"IN natohelnod a —I— budldingtm-Lil'rfim.apparalua The Incatmh nt firc department Connctivnsshallbeappprovedtythefirecudeofbciai. Aim G±lihnnia-fimnscd[('•ln)1vn.PO, l Moon Co.badordmtlsubmitplanerafIrois In$, noomilleled ffxx t li'1 bon red apgml uvt -hv to thus deportment ttnreview aril appmeal prior, Io Ix rn n •. tnav uxhrk..9U.c3.I.l NFPA l?sprinkler syclems, as aakipad and amcltdd by I,CJC ;Puler/ u junn> b Comment #c: Potable w•atar supppplies shall I,e pnRand form mu"n ival— caused by fireprotection PPealersu lies.hicthenrop.oneihifty ut thl. uppti.anl and an)•rrmha Yen and cubcmur..tdon:lo culi6cl Ihr water PPiuveyorsuppiying the ate of led+ pn,je d, and towntvilb fherequin[ments of that pun•rt)wr.5ucly tuquirmnenl' s shalt be incorporated. inn tvedaecigr.rd any a'atufiased fve pmtectivn sy.hnns. and/ur Ive cupprcsSirmwatls•,hpply systamsor at,rage omtanrers tlml cosy be• phyantly rx tmednd do am'' manner manapplann• rapabli•'of ceugng ronlnminahan of Ibr linable water >up ilyof the purveyor of ntrd.l5nal app-1al uI thesm:stunl•l under dahaidvratic will not t+u •nml bl•tA. orifice untilcmmtplianmu•iN, the requiresn.nGoilt1,n±vatur punrym cif retardarc b d vn!mental ty tla( pctrveyoroshavingM!en art b)• the appltramCx/. +07 CFC Sac. 9?.35amd Haalih and Sa(etr Cade 13114.7 cntIntent 3T.Private On -Site Sfenifpphipc Required: I+rm•idu one pdvaleon-siW atandpipr in'Ldld at a Innmcm to be detrnnined by the Fbe Deparbnrn4 w dh mirrimmn acceptabic flavaf 1,01 CpM at 20 psi madual presstm.. PriorIII design, the poi t-1c_ngmttr-flat] mteetwith the ore d'paiems•tIt u atersupply offs— to h>:ndrspun the regaled fire hydrant iumlinns. CK Sec. 5W, and AppenNs Bjible. 3109.1 and .Appumd!x Cui ::,••. i:i:i,n• w ri xa-'- iawi aw.•,a.r rz tGi ® ® r 1- U. _ :am ila+l .\ohm tti r. I:t s'- hh_sP I 'Ea^ im.n a,,.luPment. t hl numl5nn we. 1'. a14R1': PARISH Q3LT[[Y.JL iZl. Umn.: i: 1—G.. 1.511, JB . _................. .. . Iiv+Lng. CA ug0r3n: u cda sarB s. ca w . aaltenl caeaa EaE$E it 07U 47:1e ,aa Caw tor" 4. A102.a18 ra$,-vauamn.npA„ r utma s».,••Mw:.+vi.:.+ a DEVELOPMENTAL REVIEW COMMENTS Cmnment aN: Emergency Gate/Access Gale Reyuiremenis: Gate ins[,illattnrls o-imli ccmftml north fire Depadmer Standard Details andSpfciBmnon G-1 and whun open shan rot ob<tmct any 9 ,muun of the nemquimd vvidtt for emergency a—ruadumyo or d avs. I c k., IF I .dad, shah! be fine deparhntappmned privy to installation. Dues as amas the una"Senc. s"Zitys$hall bregmpped willpppr,.,,dAebdevicees. If the gates are 0,pnmrd elertr!eady, m! approvd Knaa •Swatch sh:dl:tw ln$lalld•d tluv areuixvatad mannalfl', Ihun.an appmvd K. padlocl; hall be in::tailed. Cates plvviding a •ca.:s.fromamadtoadrivewaycalHhernadwmshahbratload30feetfromtheroadbeingealnd. C fC.Sec... EM and 506 Cnmmcmt 94 ConatrUdion Site. Fire Safelyy..All a nslrvdi,+n hue:; rniut tamely watt applicable pro+•7sione of the CPC C1nptcr'i4 and our Sandard Ih'Wil nod Slacftration SI-7. C,anmen:t alp: Premises I dentifialiom: Aliprnnd number a r noon:"e. ..hurl b;: platt,l m. a0. ,.n uM ed#in buiidin ;s in sia -h a tn' cition a.to be plainh•rutiblr and lugitic In.•m thc,btt:l n. ncvd + tumldog thnpnrpert•. Numbers shall runbaxl with their bnikgr:nlnd.Cfi' Sac.SYa C.i Ie!d't 1: Acarss b Bundin eil. aoit— to Fire DepRe uimmenls: I..andscaping shall net nbslrad mimamt rddur: n •nes, lrr 11 idinl,K.l'he uiidinglx; rmu—mittai'hall milolh, andatnpu dmuing which reflect. the %ration of all laud,caping ti tndudt! 11— PimDeFa' net ladderaemis armed allI ildin s.Grand-4add r rr_=cuefromia,—Jim thirdfla,r nx+mssi,all j will be provldad g br madepusxible Lx fine department oparatunb. LA.Ith tfa•climlung anglvofvM'Rare. d-•gmns Via lid ined, an al*pmxinale walkway wnddh aianr,• eitherate of the bwldmp fiell he nil lest than even red dew. Landunpmg sha11 nM i+ealinn•cvf m interferewidth [be requrred dmsc. An app,- aa0cway shall be provided on all side•$ of the buildings) leadingfromthermarc•csroadway to the eKMriar opamingstif thetn!ilaiingix). CFC Sec. wa Comment #12: Wait Arras: provl$lens shall be muck u, ail— cmergency regxaldef access to all portion$ of the roof. us approved by the pirr Uuptutmm t. m¢ -- u u iiiial ... st 1 aeewe,n sail Tea m I,C,A a ® 1 9lemberl, 4r l in`caL': i2a) ... ai 9 2 ,nor :..oiraaow,w m w a Y i 13315 of ' .: runmernN 0erdepn!nn. -fa—. S w 31.\URY'SPARtNk5e.71(VL Zoo Br A, last aaua i:. w:r-e:«w• .. ..u:eiww .neauiso d 'fn SRYJ trOO ! iLrding, UaoSrl, vm;n Cin,n r—ly,, n, :,tPn P wow r6aus s<.:.i ^>aa rs;;ws sn 4 ..,,a s.• >:,.a. a 1 III E IX £'dtitr'i ME IN \ Ai'{A Y C TY' v) f °, h1?tl I4ruv \(3xia & r Gr w:mc th ,.n54161d cr. uaaae• 3t1 lure i. 11 ir5a DEVELOPMENTAL REVIEW COMMENTS .. ....... Comment ill: P_mergenry.nccesu key bill rnluired: h 7s the Santa Cim" Countyflat Depa lmcot•s poll : `Imu a key bra br irquifeed for buildings Illal tilt rgrdpped with rim andwr fire alarm ;yarns, Ind, pc, iu, will only hell Iiluat • the quick response t.;f em;emeua) <mw., to ir interior of a balding. CLC' Sa• ,0: and SCCFD SDSS K-I Carmmem # 14: 'Lin i.g ar Required Waller Supply hmstulluldonst InsWilutfaas of requim d f m scrylcelal and fire h-¢Immisl ahuBl uc tc Wu I n •I nrsAgard by the Ffrc Depllrmwnt, prior lc I:he sari. nftiurtung nr dvlivrry of bulk cambuxublrmmerials. BuilJinc pennn is$iumrz nvay he withheld until required invmllatlan, are comple!ed. tnimd, anti accepted. CFC Sec. 501 C'ommum #I is Tlmin' nfltm: ubed Road— Installations; Required access m-da, OF dm>twb firri tin of nspbail. s t l be tmoaled mhd W',, pled In ter t ire is .part ,prior mthe Stan of dm!husdbr camsuucuon..DolinPcodunuctin0-nee n,,; sacs.. ally..lull be Irl: i Imiradottrr all unimpeded. Nile thin building lief a more lr y be fhb. td unill n P II unri•mic unnplef<d Temporary acres.. medm rime In uppiomd am a. ,sc t r aasr t. ads- C-r11Sec, 501 cOnar em 916: lrlm Alarm Scdumm in pri,mae schools. An asthmatic fire alarm..)•stem ,hull be provided do new huildi rigs of privmc srhexNa. F% ptinn: Ama:nalfc detection de,i— arc not required ,theta mh appmvad iuutwn rem sprinkles system is.insmlled In aredone. vvidl (CFC) Section jU3.3.1.1 and Elie mvup'ant nu!INcutiou appliances will aeli-woo sprinkler wutnr flaw and nanuoi aui anon is pnsidrd fromnn'onolly accupW lncatimi. CFCW1772.3$ nKvrd rat Plans T•a pruvent plan review and Inspection deirty's, the ub., coned iheelotrmuotal Review C'onditionrusstc shah) be addd m "notes" on all Fundbig mud Tatum plan submittub andanyrefcnnccddiagramstobemptcnluceduntotalefutureplansobnattai. ra rri,aC,a. \ B "m'1'a'"eia4n'SAnn!tcea- - L:Q W i 12/1m)rat- a m 4 w..+ act law wn"aon, 2Lm' 1tY, d :'bar ,¢Orvrbphmm .., a:aiw Sr. MARY5 PAReildkSCIIMA21. Be1C on i'rruwiiiaaw -- ....., .retCcaa. ai,w: ' s,a a ewxuw,e,w 'aa tRA1 ilud p .. ge n . t<, c w c. a t a•, ,.sr., a.. Steinberg Architects St Mays Parish 219 Bean Avenue Los Gatos, CA 95030 Steinberg ArchbCtS 60 Pierce Avenue San Jose, California 07.23.2012 PLANNING RESPONSE#3 asILL 012 PLANNING RESPONSE#2 03. 142022 PLANNING RESPONSE# 1 12.192011 PLANNING DEPT. SUBMITTAL KEY PLAN Ste Mary's Parish And School Planned Development Zoning Application 219 Bean Avenue Las Gatos, CA 95030 Developmental Review Comments PROJECf411: 10109 DATE 0603.2032 SCALE N. PD- 11-006 P 1 a 0 L 6 B s LEGEND 8 Steinberg Architects E) WALL TO REMAIN i E) TO BE REMOVED 9 cua.r I St Mary'Bea A Avwan219BeanAvenue Los Gatos, CA 96030 o I SteinbergSteinberg Architects I 60 Pierce Avenue San Jane, California s A51 C A M P U S C 0 U R T Y A R D rr — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — I I I I ) II i I UP I C O U R T Y A R D I I I 1 — I I I I I I tL PROPERTY LINE TEACHERS'ROOM I STORAGE ij STORAGE H 1ST GRADE CLASSROOM 2ND GRADE CLASSROOM 3RO GRADE CLASSROOM 4TH GRADE CLASSROOM WN o—:moo—o PLAYGROUND C O U R T Y A R D EQUIPMENT 6 T O W N O F L 0 S G A T 0 S A5.1 P A R K I N G L O T Existing First Floor Plan 1 0 07.232012 PLANNING RESPONSE e3 06.012012 PLANNINGRESPONSEe2 a 03.142012 PLANNING RESPONSE i1 12.192011 PLANNING DEPT. SUBMITTAL aar aTs usus rn KEY PLAN St. Mary's Parish And School Planned Development Zoning Application 219 Bean Avenue Lm Gatcs, CA 96030 Lower School Existing First Floor Plan J PROJECT#110108 DATE 06A32012 SCMIP Vr-1'-0' PD-11-006 A5.Oa L IV, X-- Real KEY NOTES Qi EXTERIOR CEMENT PLASTER ASSEMBLY Q ALUM. STOREFRONT WINDOW O3 ALUM. STOREFRONT DOOR O METAL DOOR IN METAL FRAME O5 STEEL COLUMN 0 MASONRY WALL WITH STUCCO FINISH, SEE LANDSCAPE DRAWWNGS Qi METAL PICKET VEHICULAR GATE SEE LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS ASONRY WALL TO MATCH EMSRNG ICAL DUCTS QENEERUNSHADECANOPY, MASONRYWALL PAINTEDICALWELLSCREEN BEYONDLJOINTTYP. SOUTH ELEVATION 4 NORTH ELEVATION L, 3 EAST ELEVATIO aAr L 1 Steinberg ,architects eunnStMays P.1m 219 Sean Avenue Los Gatos, CA 95030 rmw,lcr Steinberg Amh#eots 60 PlerGe Avenue San Jose, California 07232012 PLANNING RESPONSE#3 06.012012 PLANNING RESPONSE#2 03.142012 PLANNING RESPONSE#1 12.19.2011 PLANNING DEPT, SUBMITTAL an o rt mu KEY PLAN St. Mary's Parish And School Planned Development Zoning Application 219 Sean Avenue Los GWS, CA 95030 Building Elevations & Building Section PROJECT#'.10106 DATE 06.0L2012 SCALE :3/32'-V-O' PD-11-006 A,4.1 L LEGEND: Architectural Site Plan 1 Steinberg Architects arStMarys Parish 219 Bean Avenue Los Gatos, CA. 95030 Steinberg Architects 60 Plerce Avenue San Jose, California 07232012 PLANNING RESPONSE R3 06.012012 PLANNING RESPONSE O2 03.14.2012 PLANNING RESPONSE 81 12.19.2011 PLANNING OEPr. SUBMrrrAL RP — as. KEY PLAN St. Mary's Parish And School Planned Development Zoning Application 119 Bean Avenue Los Gatos, CA 95030 Architectural Site Plan DPROJECr01.201B ATE06.01-- A. SCALE I/16-=1,0- PD- 11-006 A3.1 L 1111110 11111111111' 11111111111 Second Floor Plan J K Steinberg Architects St Marys Parish 219 Bean Avenue Los Gatos. CA. 95030 Steinberg Architects 60 Plerce Avenue San Jose, California b 07.232012 PLANNING RESPONSE#3 06.012012 PLANNING RESPONSE#2 t 03.142012 PLANNING RESPONSE#1 A4.1 12.19.2011 PLANNING DEPT. SUBMRTAL M PLAN St. Mary's Parish And School Planned Development Zoning Application 219 Bean Avenue Los Gatos, CA 95030 New Junior High School First & Second Floor Plan First Floor Plan 1 PROJECT01.20 6eeaesrnnaOATSO6A12012 SCALE 1/B' -1'0' PD-11-006 A4,0 L GENERAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN NOTES Steinberg ArchitectsUSELEGEND: BUILDING AREA cuwrStMalls Parish PRIVATE SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT Bean Avenue LosLos Gatos, C0.95030 Stelnoerg Amhiteois 60 Pleme Avenue San lose, California PRIVATE STORM DRAINAGE EASEMENT PRIVATE OPEN SPACEILANDSCAPING PAVED PARKING AND DRIVEWAY 07232012 PUNNING RESPONSE g3 06.11201, PLANNINGRESPONSE%2 03.142012 PUNNING RESPONSE#1 12.192011 PUNNING DEPT. SUBMITTAL uv AvtE iauv KEY PUN St. Mary's Parish And School Planned Development Zoning Application 219 Bean Avenue Los Gatos, CA 95030 Land Use Plan PROJECT N: 10109 DATE 06.012012 SCALE 1' -32'-0' PD-11-006 A2.0 L_ i RFS Y/* F G?) SSo 94RiCT R.1 'VT/qlJ AM Steinberg Architects St. Maya Parish 219 Bean Avenue Las Gatos, CA 95030 Stelneerg Arthltecla 60 Plerce Avenue San Jose, CalOornia 07.23.2012 PLANNING RESPONSE#3 06.012012 PLANNING RESPONSE#2 03.142012 PLANNING RESPONSE#1 an 12.192011 = NING DEK. SOBMR7AL KEY PLAN St. Mary's Parish And School Planned Development Zoning Application 219 Bean Avenue Los Gatos, CA 95030 Conceptual Campus Plan PRDJECT#:10105 DATE: 06.01.2012 SCALE:1" = 32'-0' PD-11-006 A3.0 Steinberg Architects 6; 1, 1 FTi-r Rl St. Mary's School Los Gatos, California 1 RECEIVED DEC 19 2011 TOWN OF LOS GATOS PLANNING DIVISION Victory Lane J L ate. .- • Y . i M h IT Steinberg architects St. Mary's School Los Gatos, California Lower School -View from Parking Lot ST. MARY'S PARISH AND SCHOOL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT ZONING APPLICATION PD-1 1-006 LOS GATOS , CALIFORNIA I VICINITY MAP - N.T.S.. CAMPUS PLAN - N.T.S. PROJECT DIRECTORY SHEET INDEX - PD ZONING SITE ANALYSIS S' Q N o A 411, 4p = (Jp r m W 2 n 1 \ O `?" CLIENT ARCHITECT STRUCTURALENGINEER ST. MARYS PARISH Rev. Rick Rodoni, Pastor Sr. Nick; Thomas, PrincipalRl Teri Sheperd 7ucci, Business Manager 219 Bean Ave. Los Gatos, CA 95035 408-354-3726 phone 408-354-9302 lox STEINBERG ARCHITECTS Jeffery T. Berg, AIA Pierce Avenue San Jose, CA 95110Sa408-295-5446 h 408-295-5928 la. Ae BIGGCARDOSA ASSOCIATES SCardasaMark865TheAlmnedo. Suite 200 A1. 0 TITLE SHEET A1. 1 AERIAL AND SITE PHOTOGRAPHS A2. 0 LAND USE PLAN A3. 0 CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN A3. 1 ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN CI. O PRELIMINARY GRADING & UTILITY PLAN (NORTH) CIA PRELIMINARY GRADING & UTILITY PLAN (SOUTH) CI. 2 PRELIMINARY GRADING & UTILITY PLAN (WEST) C2. 0 PRELIMINARY STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN C3. 0 PRELIMINARY NEW & REPLACED IMPERVIOUS AREAS BUILDING SF IST FLOOR 2ND FLOOR SUBTOTAL PROPOSE ACRONSITE COVERAGETOTAL BUILDING ( SF) NET ADDITION ( SF) E) ADMINISTRATIVE BUILDING 5,081 5,001 NO CHANGE 5,081 5,081 E) GARAGE 735 735 NO CHANGE 735 735 E) CHURCH 10.213 10,213 NO CHANGE 10,213 10.213 E) RECTORY/PARISH OFFICES 2,800 1.320 4,120 1 NO CHANGE 2,80D 4,120 E) MULTI -PURPOSE BUILDING 2.557 2.557 NO CHANGE 2.557 2,557 E) AFTER SCHOOL CARE 1,500 1,500 NO CHANGE 1,500 1,500 E) HOWLEY HALL 10,997 10.997 NO CHANGE 10.997 10,997 E) COUGAR'S CORNER 1,014 1,074 DEMOLISH 0 0 1,014 E) 59 VICTORY LANE 6.904 6.904 DEMOLISH 0 0 6.904 E) LOWER SCHOOL 9.187 9.187 ADDITION 10.387 10.387 1,200 SCOPE OF WORK - PD ZONING O / San Jose, CA 95126 408- 296-5515 phone 408- 2%-81u to. C4. 0 SITE PLAN (EAST) SUBTOTAL 44,270 45,590 6,71B I. CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW, APPROXIMATELY 13,500 SQUARE FOOT CLASSROOM BUILDING ON THE CAMPUS OF ST. MARYS PARISH AND SCHOOL THE BUILDING CONSISTS OF GENERAL EDUCATION MSSRODIIS, A BREAK OUT ROOM, A SCIENCE LAB, AN ART CLASSROOM, A LIBRARY AND RELATED OFFICE SPACES. THE BUILDING IS TWO STORES ABOVE GRADE WTH A STANDARD CONCRETE SPREAD FOOTING FOUNDATION SYSTEM AND WOOD FRAME CONSTRUCTION, THE BUILDING IS OCCUPANCY TYPE F, CONSTRUCTION TYPE V-B. THE BUILDING ELL BE-EGUIPPED THROUGHOUT 1/- W j ^7 O \ / V VV/ / sq PROJECT INFORMATION PROJECT SITE CIVIL ENGINEER LANDSCAPE KIER & WRIGHT Barry Schmitt 3350 Scott Bivd, Building 22 Santa Clara, CA 95054 408- 727-6665 phone 408- 727-5641 fox WHISLER LAND PLANNING Patrick Ns C4. 1 SITE PLAN (WEST) p4, 0 NEW JR. HIGH SCHOOL FIRST AND SECOND FLOOR PEWA4, 1 NEW JR. HIGH SCHOOL BUILDING ELEVATIONS AND SECTION A4. 2 VICTORY LANE - STREETSCAPE N JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL SLOG. 7,441 6,695 14,136 NEW SLOG. 7,441 14,136 14.136 N) FUTURE RECTORY 1,707 1,211 2.918 NEW SLOG. 1,707 2.918 2,9I8 TOTAL 53,418 62,644 10,336 WTH AN AUTOMATIC FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM AND FIRE ALARM. 2. RENOVATION AND APPROXIMATELY 7,200 NET SQUARE FOOT ADDITION AT THE EXISTING ONE STORY WO FRAME CLASSROOM BUILDING. 3. DEMOLITION OF EXISTING ONE-STORY BUILDING AT 59 MCIORY LANE AND LOT UNE COMBINATION. 4. CONSTRUCTION OF NEW. APPROXIMATELY 3,000 SNARE FOOT COVERED EATING AREA. ADDRESS ST. MARYS PARISH 219 BEAN AVENUE LOS GATOS, CA 95030 PLANNING APPROVALS - CODE CONSULTANT Vail 101LucasValleyRoad, Suite 261 San Rafael, CA 94903 415- 4phone 4I5-472-36N 51-7662 laxROLFJENSEN & ASSOCIATES, INC. TON OUSZA p5. 0a EXISTING LOWER SCHOOL FIRST FLOOR PLAN A5.Ob NEW LOWER SCHOOL FIRST FLOOR PLAN ASA PROPOSED LOVER SCHOOL AND EXISTING 59 VICTORY LANE ELEVATIONS 5. SITE UTILITIES, PEDESTRIAN WALKWAYS AND CONCRETE RAT WORK TO SUPPORT NEW DEVELOPMENT. 6. THE NEW FACILITIES ELL BE USED BY THE CURRENT STUDENT POPULATION. NO INCREASE TO THE APN 510-44- 084 CHURCH 5f0-44-084SCHOOL510-44-028 59 VICTORY LANE 2125 Oak Grave Road, Suite 300 Walnut Creek, CA 94596 925-938-3550 phone 925-938-3818 lox L1 LANDSCAPE PLAN L2 LANDSCAPE DETAILS RECEIVED CURRENT STUDENT ENROLLMENT ( 315) IS PROPOSED. THE CURRENT STUDENT ENROLLMENT (315) REPRESENTS AN INCREASE FROM THE ENROLLMENT LISTED IN THE 1985 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 265), A NET INCREASE OF 50 STUDENTS, 7. THE NEW FACAHE ELL T TUSED F ( 3 THECURRENT SCHOOL AND CHURCH STAFF (35.7 FTE). NO INCREASE TO THE CURRENT STAFF (35.7 FTE) IS PROPOSED. THE CURRENT STAFF (35.7 FTE) REPRESENTS AN INCREASE FROM THE ENROLLMENT LISTED IN THE 1985 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 20 FTE), A NET INCREASE 4F 15.7 FTE STAFF. S. DEMOLITION OF EXISTING COUGAR'S CORNER BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION OF FUTURE RECTORY. 9. RENOVATION OF EMSTNG RECTORY FOR PARISH ADMINISTRATIVE USE. PARCEL SIZE : 4. 18 ACRES R-10 (CHURCH AND SCHOOL) C-2 (59 VICTORY LANE) NEW R. HIGH SCHOOL EXISTING LONER SCHOOL TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: V-B V-B SPRINKLEO: YES NO BUILDING AREA: 14, 136 SF 9,187 SF EXISTING 1,200 SF NET ADDITION 10,387 SF TOTAL CONTRACTOR GEOTECHNICAL DEVCON CONSTRUCTION, INC TarnZONING 690 Gibraltar DriveMilpitas, CA 95035 408-262 2342 axna CORNERSTONE EARTH GROUP C. Barry Buller 1259 Ookmead Porkwoy Sunnyvale, CA 94085 408-245-4600 phone 408-747-7502 fax SHEET INDEX - A & S APPLICATION PARKING ANALYSIS JqN 15 2013 SAME AS ABOVE, EXCEPT All (A&S) ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN C1.1 (A& S) PRELIMINARY GRADING & UTILITY PLAN SOUTH) A5.Ob( A& S) NEW LOWER SCHOOL FIRST FLOOR PLAN TOTAL PARKING PROVIDED: 105 SPACES ON SITE, AND ONE SPACE AS REQUIRED BY THE DOWNTOWN PARKING DISTRICT, PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AREA AT (N) JR HIGH SCHOOL BUILDING IS OFFSET BY DEMOUTION OF (E) TOWN OF LOS GATOS PLANNING DIVISION I _ 0oco SCOPE OF WORK - ARCHITECTURE & SITE APPLICATION OCCUPANCY: E E A5.1 (A&S) PROPOSED LONER SCHOOL AND EXISTING 59 VICTORY LANE ELEVATIONS BUILDING AT 59 VICTORY LANE. RESULTING IN NO NET GAIN OR LOSS OF PARKING SPACES. 1 11 \-'- 00 1. SAME AS PO ZONING, EXCEPT SCOPE ITEM 12 ABOVE IS LIMITED TO: a) PARTIAL DEMQUTION OF ONE (1) CLASSROOM IN (E) LONER SCHOOL BUILDING TO CREATE LA (A&S) LANDSCAPE PLAN 4 NEW WALKWAY. NO NEW SNARE FOOTAGE ADDED. V Steinberg Architects St Mary's Parish 219 Bean Avenue Los Gatos. CA. 95030 Steinberg Architects 60 Pierce Avenue San Jose. California 01.11.2013 A&S RESPONSE Al 09.19.2012 PLANNING RESPONSE #4 07.23.2012 PLANNING RESPONSE W3 06.01.2012 PLANNING RESPONSE #2 03.14.2012 PLANNING RESPONSE #1 ecv a- 19. 20ll PSLANNING DEPT. SUBMITTAL KEY PLAN St. Mary's Parish And School Planned Development Zoning Application 219 Bean Avenue Los Gatos, CA 95030 Title Sheet PROJECT#: 10108 DATE: 01.11. 2013 SCALE: NITS. PD- 11-006 A1.0 EXHIBIT C Of Exhibit 11 V7) Aerial View Sete #TS Steinberg Architects St Mary's Parish 219 Bean Avenue Los Gatos. CA 95030 Steinberg Architects 60 Pierce Avenue San lase, California 8 V3 01.11.2013 A. RESPONSE#1 09.192012 PLANNING RESPONSE#4 07.232012 PLANNING RESPONSE#3 06.012012 PLANNING RESPONSE#2 03.142012 PLANNING RESPONSE#1 12.192011 PLANNING OEPT.SUBMrITAL KEY PLAN St. Mary's Parish And School Planned Development Zoning Application 219 Bean Avenue Los Gatos, CA 95030 Aerial & Site Photographs 1 PROJECT#:1010B DATE OL112013 SCALE: N.T.S. PD-11-006 A1.1 Y J y x III • - .,1f ' a 1 e 1 °` 7! 1 ' may^ 7 }• 1 y I WILDER AVE Zb t n W. MAIN STREET" .{ i r .. s l e • r Q( o-. .ilk - • .. j 1 1 r-_ Y- --_ -. .. w s ,, - IVISTREET y +Jti •! VICTORY LANE W. MAIN ST ` ' • ..L. .. I w`. l LYNDON AVE VICTORY LANE 5 I Ldlw Uac rid][ 1 , srxa: wr.ra• GENERAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN NOTES USELEGEND: Steinberg Architects BUILDING AREA St Mary's Parish 219 Bean Avenue PRIVATE SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT LosLos Gatos, Ca 95030 Steinberg Architects 60 Pierce AvenueSaSanlase. California PRIVATE STORM DRAINAGE EASEMENT PRIVATE OPEN SPACE/LANDSCAPING PAVED PARKING AND DRIVEWAY 01.11.2013 A&S RESPONSE #1 09'19.2012 PLANNING RESPONSE#4 07.23.2012 PLANNING RESPONSE#3 06.012012 PLANNING RESPONSE#2 03.142012 PLANNING RESPONSE#1 12.192011 PLANNING DEPT. SUBMIRAL an orz ss r KEY PLAN St. Mary's Parish And School Planned Development Zoning Application 219 Bean Avenue Las Gatos, CA 95030 Land Use Plan PROJECT#'10108 DATE: 01.11.2013 SCALE: 1" - 32' 0" PD-11-006 A2.0 I i RJR/oF TgI0 01 916, 4 5 l 7 26B jJJJ\ 42 54 36 46/ 55 72( I `\ \ 13/ 1p//\\ RFSa 11 FN 73 8 14 92 20 r --- / r 58 ; • 4 _ CFNTR, 27 22 75 So 0 I/QT / \ ll j 4' 7e l/tij? 0 v 93 B0 8, 100N/,), 66 65 64 r 95 90 97 o oP O j l NF \ yB a7 d qs O,y86 9 85 Sy a,RFpV FFA'q? \ 68 69 lODN04/SBY NGspq / 44TOFlb RE9 OY/ N2GCF OUNO' QRy c2 FSSo/ R JeU°y41 NSANGq, •F 0 GSFOU / U/a/ OFF FOF oR NGl l NGF/N NNipRFO j o/ STR/ CFSS l l c. 2J r l Conceptual Campus Plan j 1 \. 7 < LEGEND II I --BUILDING AREA NEW BUILDING AREA E) FENCE PARKING TABLE LOCATION EXISTING PROPOSED PARKING LOTS 50 50 GARAGE 3 3 BLACKTOP ' PLAY AREA' 52 52 TOTAL 105 1 105 ONE ( 1) ON -SITE PARKING SPACE TO REMAIN IN THE APPROXIMATE PARCEL OF 59 VICTORY LANE. AS REQUIRED BY THE DOVMTOPM PARKING DISTRICT. Steinberg Architects St MaNs Parish 219 Bean Avenue Los Gatos. CA 95030 Steinberg Architects 60 Pierce Avenue San lase, California 01. 112013 ABS RESPONSE#1 09. 192012 PLANNING RESPONSE #4 07. 232012 PLANNING RESPONSE#3 06. 012012 PUNNING RESPONSE#2 03. 142012 PLANNING RESPONSE#1 sw 1_. 19.2011 S eUNNINGDEPT. SUBMITTAL KEY PLAN St. Mary' s Parish And School Planned Development Zoning Application 219 Bean Avenue Los Gatos, CA 95030 Conceptual Campus Plan PROJECT#. l0108 DATE 01112013 SCALE:1': 32'-0' PD-11- 006 A3. 0 Z F LEGEND: Architectural Site Plan 1 SGIE: I/16.1'O Steinberg Architects ol- SL Mary's Parish 219 Bean Avenue Los Gatos, CA 95030 Steinberg ArChIWCts 60 Pieme Avenue San Jose. California 01.112013 A&S RESPONSE gl 09.192012 PLANNING RESPONSE a4 07.23.2012 PLANNING RESPONSE q3 06.012012 PLANNING RESPONSE#2 03.142012 PLANNING RESPONSE #1 12.192011 PLANNING DEPr. SUBMITTAL KEY PLAN St. Mary's Parish And School Planned Development Zoning Application 219 Bean Avenue Los Gatos, CA 95030 Architectural Site Plan PROJECT1: 30131.11.2013 ti SCALE: SCALE: 1/i6'-1-0' PD-11-006 A3.1 ONE ON -SITE PARKING SPACE AS REQUIRED BY DOWNTOWN PARKING DISTRICT ZW Z VICTORY LANE LEGEND: E) FENCE LYNDON AVE. Architectural Site Plan 1 s— ,ris— Steinberg Architects St Mary's Parish 219 Bean Avenue Los Gatos, CA. 95030 Steinberg Architects 60 Pierce Avenue San lose, California 01.112013 A&S RESPONSE MI 12.04.2012 A&S SUBMITTAL KEY PLAN St. Mary's Parish and School New Junior High School Building Architecture and Site Application 219 Bean Avenue Los Gatos. CA 95030 Architectural Site Plan A- DATE:01T.11.201 SCALE:1/16- VB,0• A3.1 A & S) 1 81'—a' r__1 I ffrH GRADE I I I CLASSROOM F IIIII I II I Till GRADE I CLASSROOM wI isI D p I II I II I LE I I IIIIIIIII 67N GRADE I CLASSROOM SCIENCE LAB RESTROOM II RESTROOM STORAGE BREABOUTROOM OFFICE 10'-0, l nnn n>t . 100mmem;iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii1m I Second Floor Plan 2 First Floor Plan 1 Steinberg Architects Mays Parish 219 Bean Avenue Los Gatos, CA, 95030 01.11.2013 A&S RESPONSE#1 09.192012 PLANNING RESPONSE#4 07.23.2012 PLANNING RESPONSE #3 06.012012 PLANNING RESPONSE#2 03.142012 PLANNING RESPONSE#1 12.192011 PLANNING DEFT. SUBMITTAL KEY PLAN St. Mary's Parish And School Planned Development Zoning Application 219 Bean Avenue Los Gatos, CA 95030 New Junior High School First & Second Floor Plan PROJECT#: 1013GATE: 01.132013 SCAL& E: 1/8' 1'-0' PD-11-006 A4. 0 a PROPERTYUNE 13 DP LE R07 le _GREENir-c' e w,..,... ____ _ __________________ S CCxD rLDDR CEilixL _____________________ ______, I ,I a14'-0' 9 2c-c CLASSROOM CLASSROOM sccoxo ELooR LEKI FI3STEL00R CDLNC r ________________ __ _____ _____________ ___ ___ _ , 9 ° w, CAMPUS COURTYARD g LIBRARY mm_ HALLWAY CLASSRObM a VICTORY LANE [07 x ) IF NEW PROPOSED JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL BUILDING BUILDING SECTION a,t 1- VICTORY LANt SOUTH ELEVATION 4 5 MAIOMUM ALLOWABLE ME KEY NOTES O EXTERIOR CEMENT PLASTER ASSEMBLY O ALUM. STOREFRONT WNDOW Q ALUM. STOREFRONT DOOR O METAL DOOR IN METAL FRAME Os STEEL COLUMN, PAINTED O MASONRY WALL WITH STUCCO FINISH, SEE LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS Q METAL PICKET VEHICULAR GATE, SEE LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS Q BRICK MASONRY WALL TO MATCH EXISTING O MECHANICAL DUCTS Q BRICK VENEER O METAL SUNSHADE O METAL CANOPY, PAINTED u MECHANICAL WELL SCREEN BEYOND O CONTROL JOINT, TYP. O BRICK VENEER, TYP. LIGHT FIXTURE, TYP. O WOOD FASCIA, PAINTED Steinberg Architects St. Mals Parish 219 Bean Avenue Los Gatos, CA. 95030 Steinberg Architects 60 Pierce Avenue San Jose. California 01.11.2013 A&S RESPONSE#1 09.19.2012 PLANNING RESPONSE #4 NORTH ELEVATION 3 OG.232012 PLANNING RESPONSE#306.012012 PLANNING RESPONSE #2 sc.x.: am -la• 03.142012 PLANNING RESPONSE #1 12.19.2011 PLANNING DEPT. SUBMITTAL lOP D: RDOP SECOND fLOpR LEVE CLASSROOM BSLOG. x.... .. ,......... BRSi FLOOR IFYEL KEY PLAN WEST ELEVATION 2 r St. Mary's Parish And School Planned Development Zoning Application 219 Bean Avenue Los Gatos. CA 95030 CF1J1 CLCM/iIIVIV Building Elevations & Building Section PROIEGT #: 10108 DATE: 01.112013 SCALE: 3/32-.1'-0- PD-11-006 A4.1 a VICTORY LANE - LOOKING WEST VICTORY LANE - LOOKING EAST KEY MAP N BEAN AVE. Steinberg Architects St Marys Parish 219 Bean Avenue Los Gatos, CA. 95030 Stelnherg Architects 60 Pierce Avenue San Jose, California 01.11.2013 ABS RESPONSE#1 09.19.1011 PLANNING RESPONSE#4 07.23.2012 PLANNNG RESPONSE *3 06,01.2012 PLANNING RESPONSE#2 03.14,2012 PLANNING RESPONSE 01 12.19.2011 PLANNING DEPT. SUBMITTAL KEY PLAN St. Mary's Parish And School Planned Development Zoning Application 219 Bean Avenue Los Gatos, CA 95030 VICTORY LANE - STREETSCAPE PROJECT#: 10108 DATE: 01.11.2013 SCALE: 1/16*47 PD-11-006 A 4.2 LEGEND E) WALL TO REMAIN E) TO BE REMOVED 6 a' R ry u, a i y.d STAFF _ R_R_ I C , 'I 3 GIRLS' STORAGE OFFICE OFFICE STH GRADE CLASSROOM 7TH GRADE CLASSROOM 6TH GRADE CLASSROOM STH GRADE CLASSROOM j_J BOYS' R.R. L STORAU JAN. e 7 A51 vv\ t`\ I I II PROPERTY LINE Steinberg Architects Ir cicxr SL Mary's Parish 219 Bean Avenue I Los Gatos, CA. 95030 I Steinberg Architects I 6 Pierce Avenue San Jose. California C A M P U S C O U R T Y A R D II II I Imo--------- II STOR./JAN. J I I I I J I I C O U R T Y A R D I I E____=___3=__=_E_______=i_=___E____i--- STORAGE M 1ST GRADE CLASSROOM 2ND GRADE CLASSROOM 3RD GRADE CLASSROOM I I 4TH GRADE CLASSROOM PLAYGROUND C O U R T Y A R D EQUIPMENT T Existing First Floor Plan 1 A5.7 T 0 W N O F L 0 5 G A T O 5 P A R K I N G L 0 T 4 01.11.2013 A&S RESPONSE#1 09.192012 PLANNING RESPONSE#4 07.23.2012 PLANNING RESPONSE #3 06.01.2012 PLANNING RESPONSE 42 03.142012 PLANNING RESPONSE#1 12.19.2011 PLANNING DEPT. SUBMITTAL KEY PLAN St. Mary's Parish And School Planned Development Zoning Application 219 Bean Avenue Los Gatos, CA 95030 Lower School Existing First Floor Plan PROJECT#:*10108 DATE I/B2013SCALE::1/6.1•-0* PD-11-006 A5.Oa I C A5.1 TOWN OF LOS GATOS New First Floor Plan 1 P A R K I N G L 0 T — tN.", A'iIi Steinberg Architects St. Marys Pansh 219 Bean Avenue Los Gatos, CA. 95030 Steinberg Architects 6 Pierce Avenue San Jose, California 01.112013 A&S RESPONSE#1 G9.19.2012 PLANNING RESPONSE#4 07.23:2012 PLANNING RESPONSE#3 06.012012 PLANNING RESPONSE#2 03.142012 PLANNING RESPONSE#1 12.19.2011 PLANNING DEPT. SUBMR7AL KEY PLAN St. Mary's Parish And School Planned Development Zoning Application 219 Bean Avenue Los Gatos. CA 95030 Lower School New First Floor Plan PROJECT 303 DATE OLI12013 SCALE 1/&' 1'-0' PD-11-006 A5.Ob 5 LEGEND 3 (E) WALL TO REMAIN e 6 ( N) WALL I C A M P U S C O U R T Y A R D \ in - --— STAFFR.R. s GIRLSR.R. STORAGE OFFlCE OFFICE BOYS R.R. STORAGE JAN. UP A\ t\ I I ui t I vNI i PROPERTY LINE 3RD GRADE 4TH GRADE I I F.F. +416.40 STH GRADE F----------------------------------------------------------.. I J C O U R T Y A R D i r' TEACHER'S EOUIIPMENI'------ MASONRY WALL 191 -0" 6 T 0 W N O F L 0 S G A T 0 S A5.1 P A R K I N G L 0 T C F.F. .416.40 - --- ---i I PEDESTRIAN WALKWAY I I I STORAGE New First Floor Plan V--. A4 1 Steinberg Architects SG Marys Parish 219 Bean Avenue Los Gatos, CA 95030 Steinberg Architects 60 Plente Avenue San Jose. California 01,112013 A&S RESPONSE NI 12.01.2012 A&S SUBMITTAL a- is. KEY PLAN St. Mary's Parish and School New Junior High School Building Architecture and Site Application 219 Bean Avenue Los Gatos. CA 95030 Lower School 119 New First Floor Plan PROJECT 11: 3030R DATE: 01.112013 SCALE I/S' - 1'-0' A5.Ob A & S) i P PROPERTY LINE TOP RICH R0 TOP OF _GYI kGOF r9 5" TOWN OF LOS GATOS PARKING LOT FIRST FLOGR LEVE U'-G 3 2 B West Elevation at Kindergarten 8 PROPERTY LINE n I PROPERTY LINE TOP OF .IGH ROOF,a 2 West Elevation 7 W.— KEY NOTES Q EXTERIOR CEMENT PLASTER ASSEMBLY Qz ALUM. STOREFRONT WNDOW Q ALUM. STOREFRONT DOOR Oa METAL DOOR IN METAL FRAME O STEEL COLUMN O MASONRY WALL WITH STUCCO FINISH, SEE LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS O METAL PICKET VEHICULAR GATE, SEE LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS BRICK MASONRY WALL TO MATCH EXISTING North Elevation 5 PROPERTY LINE TOP OF HIGH R00L Steinberg Architects SL Marys Parish 219 Bean Avenue Los Gatos, CA. 95030 Steinberg Architects 60 Pierce Avenue San lase. California TOP OF HIGH RCO 13' 3" TOP OF LOW ROOF9'-6" 01.11.2013 A&S RESPONSE#1 FIRST_ FLOOR LEVE 09.192012 PLANNING RESPONSE k4 0 u 07.2.2012 PLANNING RESPONSE N3 06.01.2012 PLANNING RESPONSE 42 03.142012 PLANNING RESPONSE#1 12.192011 PLANNING DEPT. SUBMITTAL PROPERTY LINE I 1 St. Mary's Parish And School 59 Victory Lane West Elev. (To Be Demolished) 4 59 Victory Lane South Elev. (To Be Demolished) 3 Planned Development sole '/a`ra I PROPERTY LINE Zoning Application 219 Bean Avenue Los Gatos. CA 95030 E E Proposed Lower School & I I Existing 59 Victory Lane Elevs. 59 Victory Lane East Elev. (To Be Demolished) 2 59 Victory Lane North Elev. (To Be Demolished) 1 DDATTOJECTEE:0 i zou SCALE: 1/8- r-O' PD- 11-006 A5.1 5 3 q lN PROPERTY LINE i r-7 PROPERTY LINE H ,; RGO,F. a a West Elevation 7 sc— „ — KEY NOTES O MASONRY WALL `MTH STUCCO FINISH, SEE LANDSCAPE ORAWNGS O BRICK MASONRY WALL TO MATCH EXISTING O OVERHANG PROPERTYLINE TOP OF HIGH ROOD, South Elevation 6 Steinberg Architects St. Marys Parish 219 Bean Avenue Las Gatos, CA. 95030 Steinberg Architects 60 Pierce Avenue San Jose. California iGP OF HIGH ROOF TOP OF LOW P.00F 9'-6" FIRST FLOOR LE 01.11.2013 A&S RESPONSE#1 12.042012 A&SSUBMITTAL North Elevation 5 " a"` PROPERTYLINE St. Mary's Parish and School 59 Victory Lane West Elev. (To Be Demolished) 4 59 Victory Lane South Elev. (To Be Demolished) 3 New Junior High School PROPERTYLINE °C"" `r°•"`'" Building i Architecture and Site Application 219 Bean Avenue Los Gatos. CA 95030 B Proposed Lower School & Existing 59 Victory Lane Elevs. 59 VictoryLane East Elev. (To Be Demolished) 2 59 Victory Lane North Elev, (To Be Demolished) 1 DATE: 0T11,201BrySATE:: 1/8'- - srxe yr-rc ae.rs: va•.ra SCALE:1/&'=1'-0' A5.1 A & S) LEGEND ABBREVIATIONSDESCRIPTIONPROPOSEDEXISTING PROPERTY LINE -- AC ASPHALTIC CONCRETE ADJACENT PROPERTY LINE AD AREA DRAIN - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - BC BACK OF CURB SteinbergCENTERLINE - CB CATCH BASIN Steinberg ArchitectsliceOilys EASEMENT - - - - - - CL CENTERLINE W BUILDING LINE CO CLEAN OUT - C CONCRETE I ._. _.-_........___..-_.__...__.. Z7 T p 7 T_A..,:.. .- __. W ELECTROUER DI DROP INLET _. _ ... _._..__.. ...-:_ V 1C OR LANE STORM DRAIN MANHOLE 0 DR DOOR _ W EB ELECTRIC BOX - - IWSANITARYSEWERMANHOLE - - SL Marys Parish EP EDGE OF PAVEMENT ..: -- Z- 219 can Avenue GAS METER - - _. 410.2t e A e e a EV ELECTRIC VAULT >-. --- 410_6t " PROF Los Gatos, CA 95030 VALVE j EW EDGE OF WALK CATCH BASIN ® OR - OR EX E%ISTING --- _.. : (,9'6 M,LO.LZ S) naonrz.^r FF FINISH FLOOR - -:-- ' --•' :\GM SteinbergArchitects 410.4 60 PiercAvenue AREA DRAIN ® FL FLOW LINE - - San lase, California CLEAN OUT - FW FACE OF WALL ,,.= ',` a10.75 ..._ 411.0 WATER METER 19 GRN GROUND r REMOVE D.I. $' 1 "SD Whlsler Land Harming INVINELEVATION : Road FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION n JB JUNCTION BOX ' San Rafael CAl'94 03 Ste. 261 BACK FLOW PREVENTER LIP LIP OF GUTTER P. S.S.E. PRIVATE SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT POST INDICATOR VALVE ti P.S.D.E. PRIVATE STORM DRAINAGE EASEMENT ' BOLLARD PV PAVEMENT SIGN -, RIM RIM ELEVATION SDCO STORM DRAIN CLEANOUT TREE SDMH STORM DRAIN MANHOLE C4,o 1 _ SPOT ELEVATION I00.00 ,..-: •-1 SSCO SANITARY SEWER CLEANOUT / \Cn' 0 SSMH SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE "• \ .,J "' 412.0- CONTOUR t5_ CURB SUB STREET LIGHT BOX - -__ TO TELEPHONE BOX s B I O T R E A T M E N T POND CURB & GUTTER TC TOP OF CURB N TO TRENCH DRAIN BOTTOM 0 F POND ND = 4 O 9.6 BueBLER a 16 23 RWL FENCE -`-'- TSB TRAFFIC SIGNAL BOX ° RIM 40KIER & WRIGHT AC PAVING 0 TW TOP OF WALL _ ,\ EH : s .., CIVIL ENGINEERS & SURVEYORS. INC. PERMEABLE PAVERS 0 UB UTILITY BOX : 416.38 ;-; sxso seRmd.:•.a w,:ano xx suns m. a. n1.rv::.a asos. CONCRETE PAVING ur.. s.om S LANDSCAPE 3 - FF 41 6.40 N" xx%x;`Ss41 VG VALLEY GUTTER 0 _. _. _ n 3 / RETAINING WALL - - -'-- - - -- ' \ COARSE ORGANIC MULCH s .J. 4i0.6 n. EDGE OF PAVEMENT .. ... _..... ' _ - - SANITARY SEWER -SS-_............... ...... ... . . . ............. I I 4416.33 STORM DRAIN - --- 410.4 I 410.6 11 W WATER W .. :,;.. ........ , FIRE SERVICE FS AD I GAS G LOT LINE TO BE REMOVED OVERHEAD .... .........' f S '' "' II '.. :: :::. 0 ,;' , - I / - s \ " F#:';'. ..'•. FH : xc.+-' ti. D. t I I II •.., a/ 7/ 0g. 1. E11.13 Am& uSr RE PONSE #1 11Planning Response 3ti ®05i2.12 Planning Response #2 Q03.{. 12 Planning Response#1kP'413.50LyADA408.5a:: y i. - .. •: --` X^ _._ ._ _. Ip' i 8' PERMEABLE PAVERSINY409.6 2 1 L t if _ 10 a1 D.s alt.13 a FSE - FS FS FS i" 1RIM4083- 41 0. 47 Z: ' 4104 RIM 4] 0.7 o- ':..'. ._ - OVERFLOW ORAL INV 409.7 RIM410.1 7 p: W RIM- 408.2t 7T jKEY PLAN j I 1 GHRISTYV12DRAINBO% St. Marys Parish SEE PLAN FOR RIM COBBLE And School ri ._ - _ u. New Junior High School Building BIORETENTION . I_ E'fr+, POND I .. ICE 2 51 219 Bean Avenue Las Get., CA 95030 I s'i . X \\ 4'RWL ..: u w s. v \1 . GROUT PIPE . ..... a 12' IN PLACE f z. I I.. MIRAFI300-314'-I 11-,} ED 1 I CACRU NSROCK I ORS 2 AND INVPRELIMINARYGRADINGSHEET INDEX 24 &UTILITY PLAN ( NORTH) DIAMETER I _ C1.0 PRELIMINARY GRADING & UTILITY PLAN ( NORTH) NOTE: 'sE4-8 COBBLES CI.I PRELIMINARY GRADING & UTILITY PLAN (SOUTH) 1. COBBLES SHALL BE 3-5- IN DIAMETER, UN CREEK COBBLES. I-- '- C1.2 PRELIMINARY GRADING & UTILITY PLAN (WEST) PROJECT #: .2011 10108 0 10 20 30 z4"- MIRAf1140NDATE 12.07.2011 AVAILABLE FROM LYNGSO GARDEN MATERIALS, (650) 364- 1730. C2.0 PRELIMINARY STORM ER MANAGEMENT PLAN SCALE: AS SHOWN COBBLES SHALL BE PLACED AT A MIN. 2' BEYOND INLET AS SHOWN. C3.0 PRELIMINARY NEW & REPLACED IMPERVIOUS AREAS Scale 1" = 10 h N.T.S. C4.0 SITE PLAN (EAST, , o BUBBLER FOR RAINWATER LEADERS 1 ENERGY DISSIPATER 2 ca.1 sITEPLAN(wfsn USER:sr -q. ex 1:\PROJEC7S\AO1017- 6\DWG\PLANNING\PD PERMIT\CI.O GRA0,4wg JANUARY la, 2013 8:32 AM I 6 `a— VICTORY LANE WLU 41 D. 2 410.61 LU PROPOSED UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC 41_63 7T 410.4 Gm Lid 41 O 75 41 1 0 RE MOVE D.I. 4c 1 :"SD E 1 0 416.3, i 416.1 MATCH LINE 7i. 0 10 20 30 Scale I"= 10ft 1.7 USER: s,eraq— 1;\PROJECTS\A01017-6\DWG\PLANNING\PD PERMIT\C1.0 GRAD.dwg SEPTEMBER 18. 2012 9:43 AM 416.2 J-- 1. X EX FF 41 6.40± 4 Steinberg Architects Sc Marys Parish 219 B.. Avenue 4 Las Gatos, CA. 95030 te It Steinberg Architects 60 Pierce Avenue San loseCalifornia F 416.40 WhIsler Land Planning 101 Lucas Valley Road Ste. 261 San Rafael CA 94903 I it I f(EY PLAN St. Mary's Parish And Q^hnni New Junior High School I Building ARCHITECTURE AND SITE APPLICATION q 219 8ean Avenue Los Gatos, CA 95030 SEE SHEET C1.2 V! PRELIMINARY GRADING UTILITY PLAN (SOUTH) PROJE 79: A01017-6 I > DATE-' 12.03.2012ce SCALE: AS SHOWN C 1 31: A & S) i 0 1111 = Fml ill m onions 1111mom111mmml 441-1:'l PERMEABLE PAVERS 413.2 4 in Jn413 .09 411 4V \ / F1 L Fl. 0 mmmmjffifflm RIMImmSIMEM m = 19 Vic.I -F '1 4 MATCH LINE 0 0 10 20 30 Scale V= ]Oft USER:—I-q— 1:\PROJECTS\A01017-6\PwG\PLMNING\PD PERMIT\C1.0 GRAD.d.q JANUARY 14, 2013 8: 32 AM Steinberg Architects KEY PLAN St. Mary's Parish And School New Junior High School II i Building 219 Bun Avenue Los Gatos, CA 95030 SEE SHEET C1.2 PRELIMINARY GRADING UTILITY PLAN (SOUTH) PROJE T#; 10108 DATE 12.072011 SCALE: AS SHOWN C1.1 r Biore4nfwn Area Maintenance Plan for SL M.ry'a I'm2 pmjed Add— a M Cana Streets 219 Been Ave. Goes Sbeat: ViL-ry Laney Assessors Pa^oat No.:: 104/4183.064,028 PmPmsy Owm¢r: Rome. Catholic Bishop of S.n Jose CosipvWd Contact: Teri Shoptwrd TuocilBusinccs Man.gar Phan No..409 35437%s 137 Isti%cif—rPMuom Uning Adrbms, 21913—Avn Ines C'utos. CA 952yJ The P.N ty .'rTbina I ebNNnbon aroa. kXatM: An dn—t d d:nw and As shown in me a:d':ercSt plm. aek tension area 1 la 1etalPd d thR mdh and of pw taw+paYod porkn9 ana a'aygMane L Fbutine Maintenance Acdvi[ka The principal mai ne— objective * to prevent sednaent buidy and clogging, s tech reduces poiNar! removal e f ieAcy and may bad to bioratertbn aroa fai:are. Ro,"w msi'terwnce aemva madme troq-aancy al which they MII ba conducied, are sho—in Tatya 1. Tablet R.aa>a MN[taM' alsUMtae l4r ebrbrelon thus Re. i a .tamnce Ta F.—Ace d Trek Re-x.-e ae:rrxlawn e.m leewmew oath 3vper. lb„tay,«.. a,:sneesard«,e 2 a'ssex:ab avr4aaga pan ,w4cl 0er4a M aenaawa sertn Iwier a606& itoiYw n? 3 day[. RlrM re .. air wdaa.uavrt:agaYr: rani•« a i,.aa[e..elsvw:Y,>tsa meow>«act« MadYy mas aeaax mn+, rwnoe> t «o[m'Yw.eam;tiam and rem«e a TRKn-.+smreal2'ea!»ec udssaaredvyeurt,n lvtea>!ar a lhlamr ,..-Aeatee;aao, yalvr. iTuna snd a nuc del n:tlaY n vze nyex emevr> xa. Reaan<w:]«2ptee airy sera Ra+'a G++. G:•ra:. .tA van 1. MraHYY u: Suisa•ei+'•!'as:Aud.l: a rawYm A4Y:a+eM ass cegra. T ' 47aUreox!a. a>.vMai%p>krmr»um---nrnuery. WOM macaw xacn fxvq oJ.y:,wei.,rtl [w tlneuaaaew dne lxe nma: p[ 9ma e ;+ mprct owe aaama wra oMrad,el ee.m, n+o,r o'axa s•Jesaamww[s am amr2v0asor mmu nts«rose.+w s preferable. Checks,* nunicipsky tot specific require-1a. 5 Pes[ mntrol st.Ud avoid menflA l no —gel orgaMSmi, or Aegp, syafiadmg ak and •star q- tity aM pubbr. inohh. APply ehnmttat cerdrdr. onlywhAA menilo,i G m3noms that acordah m and nonehom%d muth.d..,A -1 keapmg 0— bet. accooTmI. boots Whon pesbcM Bare mmamd. apply Thekart tons wad The Nat pamecan: laesbctda TIM An w-ae adequate pert d comml. Donapplypeslddeson a pmachediX<d basin. 6. S—upspiled to Mbar end pesl7cldes. Do not wasp away or t.,y wch spl ls. 7. Da not ever apply pod'wide. Spaya*vm—the inf tatkn ex'. 'a. Fallow t'te me-f saysinal— lams for miskv srd aWym materiels 6 ONy ibensed. 001W pee8eldo applleatots shatl apply P4&9'dm; 9. Ae'o11• Pesacides at the auemPriete time to maaimice:nei edecth•eness and mi—ke the lW TI ood of dschargng pesocides mm —cT With the ecceptk..1 pe mc.es, avoid app cation 4 mina expected. 10 Unean%4— usod poedc:des slut bs disposed as b—dets msm fit Vector Control Standaag wain Ph. 1 not,— In in. trn.mont mnrour.a To, mom plan fn'c day-,1. p—A t . .quit. pmnulcn. Shouki any moaojd ise—arise. contact the Sainte Mna VaY.ey Vmdor Comm] DwAct Dice- y M.. Wk Iatcic:Ctti shal 1. aWmd anty NT on aL-luiely nttessary, as [r di.Wd W pm Daviot, no tied only by a icensod professional air —a-, Connect to, the District u provided balm Santa CN. Vakyr' Ax Conmd Diek.1 76908e2or Cy. San J—. Ce4mrda 95112 PTlone: (40e) 918- 477^.' (OM 675-1155 • Fu:!408) 1986355 Ynm'swz ra0' Id.'shexeobr N. ]owed;... The aparhed 13bmkMbn A•ea inspection and Maimmna deco 0J ckast s-11 be used m condact aY:pe o— m.mhy ;.t ae noed.d;,:fandfY n cd.d mai,tonanco, ax ecc,d ,min<nanca that a cw,ducled. Pewd Wrd,I... IS-- u.rm 0... I gy r e e ou vurr, xaati m•' tlmMrxA.,cs dmt,Al [: 1sx:s 4Rntwua MFelarwed pS.ird'natw Yfr cnrdarM. 1rmlNn, rn Oda dbnlnamuY dwdip Lel.apen rJmrnrra xea xe:aaa snew,•. en+wdrosa>aa«t i a1- aaieurt<rtrarib: cagnwr'avreq Yrprww. path tan t VZC h Mdhnmr-In arm «ndrbl 2 T':ch aY Ocas Mnm,:Mhn iced a'dd: n'bxars Lrod'nttc Trxn aMdeafsrerron:dlrare star vl d- nd.. rmr.+rnM.a-_w-.v. twrcdym eo r,rrr Mfialpllml u.ann rqg rgalEl[C[Y[or rliD al61Y lblwrd d arnaMy1. Gcear l' arrd rirr 1.hew.h Mr M: sM«a•Men" U>:nb',, sar.vdeeaYr'mnf dle«aenew aMda aroa CWrsed e,l teltxdra Imposed 1rape Y. 9 MCMalcn Meacc« IF[CN CG'a;YandY4 WMetiri>rermme drMer wl.urc[..Sa, lea+n[. R M, M Ydcvn dare 'I [ rcaN 4'uF. Y.4.wr I.am p{eaw,cNY.wu • •. i. Iryn wM acabal •A iLL. nrb.`auaa wtl MJcy a Ixfxa et4.cenrmaAd2y.Mv..Wru«,[ rrdc adbeMe Y rdobrx[nhd b.ural::, i,-,;,a.. J:rrtl. pi[ Wrrriaihn=4w r:wwrtn Pk.r F:y[ w KIER & WRIGHT CML EN INEEsEo . 4S.URVEVORS, INC. ra a22 0-12i swlsos 09.10.12 Planning Response a3 Q03.14.12 Planning Response#1 KEY PLAN St. Mary' s Parish And School New Junior High School Building 219 Bean Avenue Las Gatos, CA 95030 PRELIMINARY GRADING UTILITY PLAN ( WEST) PROJECTM 10108 DATE 12. 072011 SCALE AS SHOWN C1. 2 USER: avelasquex I:\PROJECTS\ A01017-6\DWG\PLANNING\PD PERMIT\C1.0 GRAD.deg JANUARY 14. 2013 8:32 AM TMENT MAINTENANCE LEGEND HARDSCAPE DISCHARGING TO BIOTREATMENT POND SOURCE CONTROL MEASURES 1. DRAIN INLETS SHALL BE LABELED "NO DUMPING - FLOWS TO THE BAY". 2. MAINTENANCE SHALL INCLUDE REGULAR PAVEMENT SWEEPING AND CATCH BASIN CLEANING 3. PLANTING SHALL INCLUDE BENEFICIAL LANDSCAPING TO MINIMIZE RUNOFF AND USE OF PESTICIDES AND FERTILIZERS. BIOTREATMENT MAINTENANCE FOR BIOTREATMENT MAINTENANCE REFER TO SHEET C1.2. 1. BIOTREATMENT AREAS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED UNDER THE OBSERVATION OF THE SOILS ENGINEER. 2. NO BARK MULCH SHALL BE PLACED IN THE SIOTREATMENT AREA 3. SOIL MEDIA SPECIFICATIONS SHALL COMPLY WITH APPENDIX C OF THE SCVURPPP STORMWATER HANDBOOK, APRIL 2012. PLANT MATERIALS S OVERFLOW DRAIN --'-•-- SEE PLAN FOR ,..1...; ..._... . fff SEE PLAN FOR RIM ELEV.) 7 ELEVATIONS 6" le S ED PONDING STORAGE I VOLUME rO.S' BIORETENTION POND — CONCEPTUAL SECTION USER:—I-q-, I:\PROJECTS\AO1017-6\DWG\PLANNING\PD PERMIT\C2.0 STRM.d.9 JANUARY 14. 2013 8:31 AM 5 VICTORY LAN ff _]Hi NEW JUN I01 HIGH SCHOOL FE I 1 1 f STORMWATER TREATMENT METHODOLOGY EXISTING CONDITIONS: THE PROJECT 15 A REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT THAT INVOLVES REPLACING A PORTION OF AN EXISTING DEVELOPED SITE WITH A NEW BUILDING, HARDSCAPE AND LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS. ALSO, AN EXISTING BUILDING WILL BE REMODELED AND WILL ADD A SMALL AMOUNT ON NEW AND REPLACED COTG IMPERVIOUS AREA. WG DEPTH PROPOSED CONDITIONS A PORTION OF THE REDEVELOPED SITE WILL DRAIN TO THE NORTH AND BE TREATED BY A BIOTREATMENT POND AT THE NORTHERLY PORTION OF THE SITE. DUE TO LOCATION, GRADE, OR PLUMBING REQUIREMENTS, RUNOFF FROM SOME OF THE NEW AND REPLACED IMPERVIOUS AREAS WILL NOT BE ABLE TO BE CONVEYED TO THE NEW BIOTREATMENT POND. THEREFORE, UNTREATED RUNOFF SANDY LOAM P+ FROM OTHER PORTIONS OF THE SITE WITH SIMILAR COVERAGE CHARACTERISTICS WILL BE SUBSTITUTED PLANTING SOIL FOR THOSE AREAS OF THE REDEVELOPED SITE THAT CANNOT BE CONVEYED TO THE SIOTREATMENT POND. A PORTION OF THE NEW IMPERVIOUS AREA (NORTHERLY OF THE NEW JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL) WILL SHEETFLOW INTO THE BIOTREATMENT POND. THE BALANCE OFTHE RUNOFF FROM THE NEW AND SUBSTITUTED AREAS TO BE TREATED WILL BE INTERCEPTED BY AN EXISTING VALLEY GUTTER AND 5 DIRECTED INTO THE SIOTREATMENT POND 'AAA CANN INLET AND PIPE. 4"0 SOR 35 PERF. PIPE OUTLET PIPE HOLES DOWN) SEE PLAN FOR INVERT) THE PROPOSED NEW AND REPLACED IMPERVIOUS AREA TOTALS 24,710 SF. THEREFORE A C.3 ) WATERSHED AREA OF A LEAST 24,710 SF MUST 8E CONVEYED TO THE NEW eIOTREATMENT POND. THE IMPERVIOUS AREA WHICH WILL BE CONVEYED TO THE BIOTREATMENT POND IS 29,700 SF AND IS LARGER THAN REQU, RED. THE POND WILL BE SIZED TO TREAT 24,710 SF. ANY FLOWS WHICH EXCEED THE C CAPACITY OFFTHEPOND WILL BE CONVEYED TO THE STORM DRAIN VIA AN OVERFLOW DRAIN. 1 r9' E'PX SHOW A N D U ED S SEAT If4G A EWItt eE CONSI05 IIMPERVIOUSAREASteinberg Architects 1; ti nri ap. t4 r 40 60 1'= 20 f( BIOTREATMENT POND SIZING NEW & REPLACED IMPERVIOUS AREA C 2` 4,7`10 S.FAS\EE SHEET C3.0) REQUIRED SIZE OF BIOTREATMENT AREA = 4% / 5 \ OF NEW ANDAPLACED IMPERVIOUS AREA: nnn 5 24, 710 S.F. 0.04 = 988 ST AREA OF BIOTREATMENT POND = 1,156± S.F. (988 S.F MIN) IMPERVIOUS AREA BEING CONVEYED TO BIOTREATMENT POND FOR TREATMENT = 29,700 S.F. 29, 700 S.F. 24,710 S.F. OK) St Marys Parish 219 Bean Avenue Los Gatos, CA 95030 pprHitcr Steinberg Architects 60 Pierce Avenue San Jose, California Whisler Land Planning 101 Lucas Valley Road Ste. 261 San Ralael CA 94903 W KIER & WRIGHT CIVIL ENGINEERS & SURVEYORS, INC. 335p kat Boole N. ppildinp 22 kn, a N... CYikmia 95aS hxSNGBIi 2 6 I KEY PLAN St. Mary's Parish And School New Junior High School Building 219 Bean Avenue Los Gatos, CA 95030 PRELIMINARY STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN PROJECT 4: 10109 DATE 12.072011 SCALE: AS SHOWN CL. O VICTORY LANE I z l i', W a I t I 0 20 40 60 Scale 1' = 20 ft Steinberg Architects St Marys Parish 219 Bean Avenue Los Gatos, CA 95030 Steinberg Architects 60 Pierce Avenue San Jose, California Whirler Land Planning 101 Lucas Valley Road Ste. 261 San Rafael CA 94903 w KIER & WRIGHT CIVIL ENGINEERS & SURVEYORS, INC. ar3aLnu'. teeuk c. NfWr Sa A01.11.13 A&SRESPONSE#1 A09.10.12 Planning Response#3 Q1 03.14.12 Planning Response #1 I:iaj9K, — St. Mary's Parish And School New Junior High School Building 219 Bean Avenue lm Gatos, CA 95030 PRELIMINARY NEW & REPLACED IMPERVIOUS AREAS PROJECT a: 10108 DATE 12.072011 SCALE: AS SHOWN USER: svelosquea 1:\PROJECTS\A01017-6\DWG\PLANNING\PD PERMIT\C3.0 STRM.dwg JANUARY 14, 2013 8.29 AM C3.0 PL EX. BUILDING TO REMAIN — 412 410 1 408 SECTION) HORIZ. 1'=5' VERT. 1'=2' 1 6 m = LIMIT OF GRADINGIDISTURRF.D AREA (33,500 SF) TABLE OF EARTHWORK QUANTITIES CUT FILL BUILDINGS 147 620 PARKING 359 50 LANDSCAPING 35 too 541 770 EXPORT 0 BIORETENTION IMPORT 229 BASIN ......... ................... -.._.....................__._............. _-....... _.._........._.... _........ NEW RET. WALL TABLE OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS AREAS NEW AC PAVING y a Tclelie—wa t14 awns y b. Estil!]Nedareac7land dinuta—during conslna!on(cn:uisamavn6 B.aa:dr;a.-aa mn) I tth iT T1= L - It- aaoa EX. GRADE c. Fais!ing in;q!rvious snHad!area (vvludackwc.—..Inyt•_i:k,a._l.sm. k;4a.s'.iwis aldattSRn :.:trx/malkmryc dnl dliwWaYc•ai-) 1046a6 q StlR. d. Eliding inlparviuus sudac:s arca raplacuct as pan of project 7zzt,m —sq. ft e. Now inieenious sudara area c—toNaddell ac part of project /2.6so1 sy_ft 0 20 40 60 I. Wild rww uu d raFACEd unport•lous sudaco afua (d r u) 24,7fo sq. It 0. Tctai posl{ariel unperYinus sudacearea (r.. or 107•1se sq_it Scale 20 ft 1/\\/ SECTION h. P.Zu `mvaas6Tepfa<omem u1 nryarvious nudace arao a ;.c> 1W) '] i iFor redevek4anetn projxts onlYl 26 HORIZ. I'=5' VERT. 1-2' ) Steinberg Architects SL Marys Parish 219 Bean Avenue Los Gatos, CA 95030 Steinberg Architects 60 Pierce Avenue San Jose, California Whisier Land Planning 101 Lams Valley Road Ste. 261 San Rafael CA 94903 W KIER & WRIGHT CIVIL ENGINEERS & SURVEYORS, INC. 331a ka. eou ewN. aw a ,q 22 kn a ,30e1 E b i93a3E h.140ar ]i 66 i A01.11.13 A&SRESPONSERI A09.10.12 Planning Responsea3 A03.14.12 Planning Response Fl KEY PLAN St. Mary's Parish And School New Junior High School Building 219 Bean Avenue Los Gatos, CA 95030 SITE PLAN EAST) PROJEDTO: 10108 DATE 12.072011 SCALE AS SHOWN USER:6wasq— I:\PROJECTS\A01017-6\DWG\PLANNING\PD PERMIT\C4.0 AREA.dwq JANUARY 14, 2013 8:30 AM AN E f e t El a _\ Stelnber Architectsg n .> St. Marys Parish 9 B Awnueun Las Gatos. CA95 030 I - n a Steinberg Architects 60 Pierce Avenue j I .•. I: „_ ^ l 1 San Jose. Cellfomia LEGEND LIMIT OF GRADING/DISTURBED AREA 3 y t 0 20 40 60 Scale I" = 20 ft Whisler Land Planning 101 Lucas Valley Road Ste. 261 San Rafael CA 94903 IrW KIER & WRIGHT CIVIL ENOIIEERS 8. SaURVEYORS. INC. 727666ie50s. r+. ( 408) 727 s0<I Q0114. 12 Planning Responsedl KEY PUN St. Mary's Parish And School New Junior High School Building 219 Bean Avenue Las Gatos, CA 95030 SITE PLAN WEST) PROJECT R: 10108 DATE 12.072011 SCALE AS SHOWN USER: sWasque7 I:\PRO,ECTS\A01017-6\DWG\PLANNING\PD PERMIT\C4.0 AREAAd g JANUARY 14, 2013 8:30 AM r23 LLI Z W , LSE BOTANICAL NAME DECIDUOUS FLOWERING TREE PYRUS 'ARISTOCRAT' FLOWERING PEAR 24'5OX 10' T. X 3' W 36' TALL. 11' WIDE FLOUERING ACCENT TREE LAGERSTROEMIA'TUSCARORA' CRAPE MYRTLE 24' BOX 8' T X 2' W. IT TALL B' WIDE TREE AT BICFILTRATION PLANTING AREA ISETULA NIGRA'DURA HEAT' RIVER BIRCH24' BOX B' T. X T W. 40' TALL X 25, WIDE OR OTHER TREE LISTED FOR USE IN BIORENTION AREA ON APPENDIX D OF SANTA CLARA COUNTY URBAN RUNOFF POLUTION PREVENTION PROGRAM C3 Stannwater HAndk, o April 2012 EXISTING TREE TO REMAIN EXISTING TREE TO BE REMOVED tt WATER CONSERVINGTUB DWADWARFFESCUE BLENDLENDPACIFIC SOD DU)ARF MEDALLION WATER CONSERVING SI-IRU55 AND GROUND COVER EXAMPLE PLANTS, COTCNEASTER'LOWFAST' COTONEASTER I GALLON VEMEROCALLIS DAYLILY I GALLON PHORIIUM 'HAORI QUEEN' NEW ZEALAND FLAX 5 GALLON PITTOSPOR2't'CREME DE MINT' DWArd PITYOSPORIM 5 GALLON RHAPHIOLEPIS'BALLERINA' INDIA HAWTHORNE 5 GALLON TRACFELOSPERUM JASMINOIDES STAR JASMINE IGALLON GAZANIA MISUA YELLOW GAZANIA FROM FLATS STO WATER TREATMENT AREA PLANTS EXAMPLE PLANTS: ASAPANTHUS ' QUEEN ANNE' LILY OF THE MILE I GALLON IRIS DOUGLASIANA OOLGLAS IRIS 1 GALLON JUNCU5 PATENS ' ELK BLUE CALIFORJIA RUSH i GALLON MAHCNIA REPENS CREEPING OREGON GRAPE I GALLON SISYRI C IUM CALIFORNICUM YELLOW -EYED GRASS I GALLON NOTE PLANTINGAND IR2IGATION SHALL COMPLY WITH WATER EFFICIENT SEE IRRIGATION NOTES SHEET L2 LANDSCAPE STANDARDS. ACCENT PAVING. INTERLCC.KING FAV€RS 4X8 TERRA COTTA COLOR BRICK APPEARANCE. - -,460 PACIFIC INTERLOCK' 86:M'1 IN 01 BLEND COLOR"_-•>- NEW CONCRETE PAVING WITH GRAY INTEGRAL COLOR •.. AND MEDIUM BROOM FINISH ..... NEW ASPHALT PAVING I NEW PERMEABLE INTERLOCKING GINTERLOCKPAVERSPACIFIC i 80 MM 4 X8 HOLLAND PAVER IN BI COLOR TERRA GOTTA BLEND. TRULY POROUS PAVING- 3 TO 4 INCH DEEP COARSE ORGANIC MULCH. a` nx4'-4+ icas{ DO NOT DISTURB EARTH L S' tia'' UNDER REMOVEDORBASENNG. LMITED NEW PLANTING. SEE TREE NOTES SHEET L2 EXISTING TREE TABLE KEY BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME TRUNK DIAMETER SAVED OR REMOVED NOTES Steinberg a, T St. Marys Parish 219 Bean Avenue Los Gatos, CA. 95030 1RC MCT Steinberg Architects 60 Pierce Avenue Son Jose, California Zos - . s.- T isle, Land Planning 101 Lucas Valley Road Ste. 261 San Rafael CA 94903 01. 11.13A k S Response /1 12. 03.12 Planning Response #4 07. 24.12 Planning Response A3 05, 22.12 Planning Response #2 0314. 12 Planning Response p1 uv o.a rssc 1. V-0" TO 8'-W HIGH MASONRYMrALL WITH STUCCO FINISH TO MATCH NEW BUILDING. HEIGHT VARIES BETWEEN V-0'to 8'-0' TO ACCOMMODATE AND CONFORM TO NATURAL GRADE OF THE SITE. KEY PLAN 2. VEHICULAR GATE- METAL PICKET TO MATCH FENCING 7'-0" HIGH 3. V-O' HIGH METAL PICKET FENCE WITH FLAT BLACK OR BRONZE COLORED PAINT FINISH 4. PEDESTRIAN GATE IN FENCE St. Mary's Parish 5. BRICK PILLAR V-Q" TALL X 4'-W LONG X 2'-6" DEEP. SEE SHEET L2 FOR ELEVATION. And 6. VEHICULAR GATE- METAL PICKET TO MATCH FENCINGV-0' HIGH School 7. NEW DRIVEWAY APPROACH 8. PLANTING AREA AT GRADE LEVEL New Junior High School 9. PLANTING AREA AT GRADE WITH BIOFILTRATIONOFSTORM WATER Building 10. CONCRETERAMP11. NEW RAISED PLANTER 12. RENOVATED PLANTING IN REMAINING SECTIONS OF EXISTING PLANTERS 13. LAWN AREA 14. NEW CONCRETE PAVING 15. NEW ASPHALT PAVING 219 Bean Avenue 16. EXISTING ASPHALT PAVING Los Gatos. CA 95030 17. NEW PERMEABLE INTERLOCKING PAVERS 18. TREE WELL AND GRATE AT GRADE LEVEL AT EXISTING OAK TREE. 19. LOW CONCRETE RETAINING WALL APPROXIMATELY V-6" TO 7-0- TALL 20. COVERED SEATING AREA -150 STUDENT CAPACITY. 21. CONCRETE STEPS 22. SAVE AND PROTECT EXISTING COAST LIVE OAK TREE. SEE TREE NOTES & DETAIL SHEET L2 23. BOLLARD LIGHT 36" HIGH BLACK OR BRONZE IN COLOR -13 LIGHTS TOTAL SEE SHEET L2 24. WELL LIGHT FLUSH WITH GRADE LED LAMP.WALL WASH UPLIGHTS TO LIGHT Landscape Plan PILLARS. SEE SHEET L2. 25. LOUVERED WALL LIGHTS IN PLANTERS TO LIGHT STEPS. SEE SHT L2. 26. LINE OF BUILDING OVERHANG 27. EXISTING BRICK MASONRY WALL TO REMAIN PROJECT C 10108 28. NEW BRICK MASONRY WALL TO MATCH EXISTING 1L 67J20 l_0_ gCAI 29. EXISTING CONCRETE PAVING TO REMAIN 71 30. NEW PLANTING AT GRADE LEVEL TO SCREEN NEW BACKFLOW DEVICES 31. CARFULLY REMOVE EXISTING CONCRETE WITHOUT DISTURBING BASE MATERIAL I AND INSTALL 3 TO 4' OF COARSE ORGANIC MULCH. REPLACE GRAVEL AT BASE OF L " TREE WITH ORGANIC MULCH. SEE TREE NOTES SHEET L3. NEW BRICK COLLU-NS WITH TO MATCH HOWLEY HALL WITH SIGNAGE PEDESTRIAN GATE 1 BEAN AVENUE ENTRY NEW FENCE AND GATE ELEVATION I/411=I'-0" TREE GRATE 6 INCH DEAR FROM TREE 71 R TREE GRATE SHALL BE GALVANISED STEEL WTH POUDERED COATED ORLryQE PAW TREE GRATE TO HAVE FASTED RS TO STEEL FRAME TO ALLOW FOR REMOVAL LF GRATE BO TT7 NICK FERVICUS PAVERS b'-0SQUARE CENTERED PN TFEE TREE GRATI STEEL FRAME BEAMS a INCH CLEAR FROM TREE TPJNC 'LORNEL W IVERSITT' S1RLTURAL FILL AS AVAILABLE EXISTNG CONCRETE BASE IMN PAVERS ARED TO COARSE B (LLCM OVER LL•DISTURBED EXISTING BASE F' K 3 INCHE9 MINIMUM. FROM TNT ENT. IN SAN 105E. TYPICAL WDER PERVIOUS CONC. BASE TO CONTAIN PAVERS PAVERS SWALE eO MM THICK PERVIOUS PAVERS 6' OAK TREE 6' REMOVE EXISTINGNC CORETEPNG AV, STEPS AND BUILDING SLAB NEW ASPHALT PAVING 6' 6' WDISNffBED EXISTING BASE ROOK LEFT W PLACE. CONCRETE BASE IIATH PAVERS YORNEL-IVEF5ITT' STFiKTURAL FILL. AS AVAILABLE ': TYPICAL AT TREE WELL AND WDER PERVIOUS PAVERS FROM TNT EM. W SAN JOSE. TYPIG UNDER PERVIOU5 MORTARED TO BASE TO CONTAN PAVERS REINFOROED CONCRETE TREE DELL PAVERS Ar7 7 a. -' i p a• .,. t 4 py4r.'..p ."' :t>"%e. 't 2 yi t '3.. SS' X :FYI{yG# _ — — _ _ _ I - _ , r., • r- i , / r i.. ' - z - .} .:".S E ;H c r;'; --- -_ - oXAu um 1 d [ FOCK LEFT IN f nc Y {, { UNGCR P'RVIOvS PAVER A vERs cAFZTI P LIGBTIN INC. SPECIFICATION SHEET SPJ13- 25 Ac; ustable WEII Light ry t MODEL: SPJ13-25 MATERIAL. Cast Braes I PVC Sleeve (Concrete Pour) ELECTRICAL: 12v or 120v SOCKET: RI -Pin LAMP: LED 3W ,80- OPTIC MOUNTING In -Ground 2700K Dr. Over Rates SPJ LIGHTING INC. _ 3R;; A'fix3TFAA: i5231 eg;"A538 PILLAR WALL WASH LIGHT SPECIFICATION SHEET 2 TREE WELL SECTION AT OAK TREE NO.63 3/4"=1'-O" sttwya seneN 4 Lot GNmG 94 Line 94 i Recessed Steplights r4. n. R +vru a«w ptl a tFaF 14 +L J _ tY Pe4Fnf VILLLTYPE 4ANP PHILIPS GARDCO p5. awn'. sa:ta live. L«(iekFCA wr« BOLLARD v+ T. BRM8221 826 Schaal Ballard w wp mxnwuw mw n ww.ww.,»n«Rmwh n.aa-.n,wl FseFlx Val ....,.... rv. ...,., .,...., x MTtONS r • mv PPfflps GARDCO LOUVERED WALL LIGHT AT STEPS BOLLARD LIGHT SPECIFICATION SHEET SPECIFICATION SHEET TREE NOTES: 1. OAK TREE #63: TREE WELL AND GRATE SHALL BE APPROXIMATELY 10 FOOT SQUARE INSIDE TO INSIDE CENTERED ON TREE. ANY BASE MATERIAL UNDER REMOVED PAVEMENT WITHIN THE DRIP LINE SHALL REMAIN IN PLACE. ANY FILL PLACED WITHIN THE DRIPLINE OF THE TREE SHALL BE LOAD-BEARING'CORNEL UNIVERSITY STRUCTURAL SOIL, AVAILABLE FROM TNT ENTERPRISES IN SAN JOSE. PERMEABLE PAVERS SHALL BE TRULY PERMEABLE SUCH AS'UNI-ECOSTONE' OR'HYDRO-FLOW . THE TREE GRATE SHALL BE DESIGNED TO LEAVE A MINIMUM OF 6 INCHES CLEAR BETWEEN THE TRUNK AND GRATE. THE TREE GRATE SHALL BE REMOVABLE TO PROVIDE ACCESS TO TREE TRUNK AND ADJACENT GRADE. THE GROUND SURFACE BELOW THE TREE GRATE SHALL HAVE 3 TO 4 INCH DEEP COARSE ORGANIC LAYER OVER UNDISTURBED EXISTING GRADE. SEE DETAIL 2 THIS SHEET. 2. REDWOOD TREE #65: PAVEMENT REMOVED AROUND THIS TREE SHALL BE DONE WITH EXTREME CARE SO AS NOT TO DISTURB EARTH AND TREE ROOTS BELOW PAVING. THE EXPOSED SOIL OR BASE ROCK MATERIAL UNDERNEATH THE PAVING WILL NOT BE DISTURBED GRUBBED, SCARIFIED, ROTOTILLED OR GRADED. SEE SUPPLEMENTAL TREE PROTECTION NOTES PAGE 2 OF DEBORAH ELLIS CONSULTING ARBORIST TREE PROTECTION RECOMMENDATIONS DATED JULY 18TH 2O12. A 3 TO 4 INCH LAYER OF COURSE ORGANIC MULCH SHALL BE SPREAD OVER EXPOSED EARTH OR PAVING BASE ROCK. LIMITED NEW PLANTING OF 1 GALLON CONTAINER SIZE PLANTS OR SMALLER MAY BE INSTALLED IN HAND DUG HOLES AND IRRIGATED WITH DRIP IRRIGATION PLACED ON TOP OF EXPOSED EXISTING EARTH OR PAVING BASE ROCK. THE PROJECT ARBORIST SHOULD BE ON SITE TO MONITOR PAVEMENT REMOVAL. 3. TREES #61 JAPANESE MAPLE AND AND #68 MAGNOLIA: USE PLANT MATERIAL TOLERANT OF MODERATE TO HIGH WATER IRRIGATION APPLICATIONS IN THE AREA IMMEDIATELY SURROUNDING THE TREE (E.G. AGAPANTHUS) AND SUPPLY SEPARATE IRRIGATION VALVE FOR THE IMMEDIATE AREA SURROUNDING TREE TO ALLOW FOR LOCALIZED MODERATE TO HIGH WATER REQUIREMENT OF THESE TREES TO REMAIN. 4. ALL TREES TO REMAIN SHALL BE PROTECTED PER CITY OF LOS GATOS GENERAL TREE PROTECTION DIRECTIONS AND AS NOTED IN THE PROJECT ARBORIST REPORT DATED MAY 1, 2012 AND SUPPLEMENTAL LETTER BY DEBORAH ELLIS CONSULTING ARBORIST TREE PROTECTION RECOMMENDATIONS DATED JULY 18TH 2012 SHOWN ON SHEETS T1 THROUGH T6. NOTES IRRIGATION ZONES A SHADE TOLERANT: NORTH OR NORTHEAST EXPOSURE SHRUB AND GROUND COVER PLANT ZONE B. AREAS WITH NORTH OR NORTHEAST EXPOSURE B SUN TOLERANT: SOUTH OR 5CUTH1E5T EXPOSURE AREAS WITH SOUTH OR PLANT ZONE C SOUTHWEST EXPOSURE. C. LAWN AREAS NOTES ALL PLANTED AREAS SHALL BE WATERED BY MEANS OF AN AUTOMATIC IRRIGATION SYSTEM EQUIPPED WITH A MULTI -PROGRAM CONTROLLER TO ALLOW SEPARATE WATERING SCHEDULES FOR VARYING EXPOSURES, PLANT REQUIREMENTS AND SITE CONDITIONS. THE IRRIGATION SYSTEM SHALL INCORPORATE, DRIP IRRIGATION BUBBLER HEADS AND, LOW PRECIPITATION RATE SPRAY HEADS. IRRIGATION MAINLNE PIPE 514ALL ISE SCHEDULE 40 OR CLA55 315 PVC PIPE WITH 18' OF COVER MINIM" IRRIGATION LATERAL LINES SHALL BE CLASS 200 OR SCHEDULE 40 PVC PIPE WITH 12' MINIMU'7 COVER ALL IRRIGATION PIPE UNDER VEHICULAR PAVIWa SHALL HAVE 24' OF COVER ALL PIPE UNDER PAVING SHALL BE LOOSELY ENCASED IN LAFW.ER SIZE PVC. SCHEDULE 40 PVC SLEEVE. IRRIGATION 15 TO BE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH WATER EFFICIENT LANDSCAPE STANDARDS AND IRRIGATION GUIDELINES. IRRIGATION WATER SUPPLY SHALL BE SUPPLIED FROM AN EXISTING OR NEW IRRIGATION MAINLINE PROTECTED BY A REDUCE PRESSURE BACKPLOW DEVICE TO ISOLATE FROM DOMESTIC WATER SUPPLY. Steinberg GIpT St. Marys Parish 219 Bean Avenue Los Gatos, CA. 95030 Steinberg Architects 60 Pierce Avenue San Jose, California Whisler Land Planning 101 Lucas Volleyy Road San Rafael CA 94903 01. 11.13 A8S Response #1 12. 02.12 Planning Response #4 07. 24.12 Planning Response #3 05. 22.12 Planning Response #2 03. 14.12 Planning Response #1 sev . Ate issue KEY PLAN St. Mary's Parish And School New Junior High School Building 219 Bean Avenue Los Gatos, CA 95030 Landscape Details PROJECT 0,10108 DATE: 12707 SCALEASSH02011 L. 2 PI ANIT I Gr CNIn TREES ANI NA TAISIZE DECIDUOUS FLOWERING TREE PYR15 'ARISTOCRAT' FLOWERING PEAR 24-BOX 10' T. X 3' W 36' TALL. M' WIDE FLOWERING ACCENT TREE LAGERSTROEMIA 'TUSCARORA' CRAPE MYRTLE 24' BOX S' T %2' W. IT TALL B' WIDE TREE AT BIOFILTRATION PLAITING AREA BETULA NIGRA VURA HEAT' RI ER BITCH 24' BOX S' T-X 2' W. 40' TALL X 25' WIDE OR OTHER TREE LISTED FOR USE W BIORENTION AREA ON APPENDIX D OF SANTA CLARA COUNTY URBAN RUNOFF POLUTION PREVENTION PRcLLaoa OGRAMC3StaremiatmHAnkAprI1 2012 Yta EXISTING TREE TO REMAIN x EXISTING TREE TO BE REMOVED p1 EXISTING LAWN WATER CONSERVING SHRUBS AND GROUND COVER EXAMPLE PLANTS: COTONEASTER' LOJFAST' COTONEASTER I GALLON HEMEROCALLIS DAYLILY GALLON PHORMIUM MAORI QUEEN' NEW ZEALAND FL" 5 GALLON PITTOSPORUM ' OREME DE MINI' DWAR, PITYOSF'OR1M 5 GALLON RHAPHIOLEPIS' BALLERINA' INDIA HAWTHORNE 5 GALLON TRACHELOSPSF U JASMNOIDES STAR JASMINE I GALLON GAZANIA ' 1115UA YELLOW' GAZANIA FROM FLATS STORM WATER TREATMENT AREA PLANTS EXAMPLE AGAPANTWJ5- QUEEN ANNE LILY OF THE NIL. 1 GALLON IRIS DOUGLASIANA DOUGLAS IRIS 1 GALLON A NCUS PATENS - ELK BLUE' CALIFORNIA RUSH I GALLON MAHONIA REPENS CREEPING OREGON GRAPE I GALLON SISYRNCHIUM CALIFORNICUM YELLOW -EYED GRASS I GALLON NOTE: FLAMINGAND IRRIGATION SHALL COMPLY WITH WATER EFFICIENT SEE IRRIGATION NOTES SHEET L2 LANDSCAPE STANDARDS. PAVING LEGEND SYMBOL DESCRIPTION 2 4 ! NEW ACCENT PAVING. INTERLOCKNG PAVE515 4XB TERRA GOTTA COLOR BRICK APPEARANCE. - #60 PACIFIC INTERLOCK 'HOLLAND' SO MM IN 01 BLEND COLOR NEW PERMEABLE INTERLOCKING PAVERS - PACIFIC INTERLOCK HYDRO -FLOW 80 MM 4 X814OLLAND PAVER IN BI COLOR TERRA GOTTA BLEND. ; TRULY POROUS PAVING. . NEW CONCRETE PAVING ... WITH GRAY INTEGRAL , FINISH ANDMEDIUMBROOMFINISHNEW ASPHALT PAVING 3 TO 4 INCH DEEP COARSE ORGANIC MULCH. DO NOT DISTURB EARTH OR BASE ROCK UNDER REMOVED PAVING. LIMITED NEW PLANTING. SEE TREE NOTES SHEET L2 EXISTING TREE TABLE KEY BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME TRUNK DIAMETER SAVED OR REMOVED NOTES Steinberg a> aT S. Morys Porish 219 Bean Avenue Los Gotos, CA. 95030 ucT Steinberg Architects 60 Pierce Avenue San Jose, California usosaes ulaeTTcr Whisler Land Planning 101 Lucas Valleyy Rd. ste. 261 San Rafael CA 94903 01. 11. 2013 A & S RESPONSE /1 09. 19.2012 PLANNING RESPONSE A4 07. 23.2012 PLANNING RESPONSE p3 06. 01.2012 PLANNING RESPONSE 02 03. 14.2012 PLANNING RESPONSE #1 12. 19.2011 PLANNING DEPT. SUBMITTAL ii a41E SSA l vu NOTES j A. U6'-0' T08'-0' HIGH MA ON WA WITH STUCCO FINISH TO MATCH NEW BUILDING. HEIGHT VARIES BETWEEN V-U'to 8'-0' TO ACCOMMODATE AND CONFORM TO NATURAL GRADE OF THE SITE. KEY PLAN 2. VEHICULAR GATE -METAL PICKET TO MATCH FENCING 7'-0' HIGH 3. V-7 HIGH METAL PICKET FENCE WITH FLAT BLACK OR BRONZE COLORED PAINT FINISH t 4. PEDESTRIAN GATE IN FENCE St. Marys Parish 5. BRICK PILLAR F-W TALL X V-O' LONG X 2'-6' DEEP. SEE SHEET L2 FOR ELEVATION. C h 6. VEHICULAR GATE- METAL PICKET TO MATCH FENCING V-0' HIGH 1 J C O O n7. NEW DRIVEWAY APPROACH 8. PLANTINGAREAATGRADELEVEL Planned Development 9, PLANTING AREA AT GRADE LEVEL WITH BIOFILTRATIONOFSTORM WATER Zoning Application 10. CONCRETERAMP11. NEW RAISED PLANTER 12. PLANTING IN EXISTING PLANTERS 13. LAWN AREA 14. NEW CONCRETE PAVING 15. NEW ASPHALT PAVING 219 Bean Avenue i6. EXISTING ASPHALT PAVING Los Gatos. CA 95030 17. NEW PERMEABLE INTERLOCKING PAVERS 18. TREE WELL AND GRATE AT GRADE LEVEL AT EXISTING OAK TREE. 19. LOW CONCRETE RETAINING WALL APPROXIMATELY 1'-W TO 2'-0' TALL 20. COVERED SEATING AREA -150 STUDENT CAPACITY. 21. CONCRETE STEPS 22. SAVE AND PROTECT EXISTING COAST LIVE OAK TREE- SEE TREE NOTES & DETAIL SHEET L2 23. BOLLARD LIGHT 36' HIGH BLACK OR BRONZE IN COLOR -11 LIGHTS TOTAL -SEE SHEETL2 24. WELL LIGHT FLUSH WITH GRADE LED LAMP,WALLWASH UPLIGHTSTOLIGHT Landscape Plan PILLARS. SEE SHEET L2. 25. LOUVERED WALL LIGHTS IN PLANTERS TO LIGHT STEPS. SEE SHT L2. 26. LINE OF BUILDING OVERHANG 27. EXISTING BRICK MASONRY WALL TO REMAIN IpP1108 28. NEW BRICK MASONRY WALL TO MATCH EXISTING DPROJECT 1 1,1= 29. EXISTING CONCRETEPAVINGTOREMAINSCALE: 1 6 1'_0' 30. NEW PLANTING AT GRADE LEVEL TO SCREEN NEW BACKFLOW DEVICES 31. CARFULLY REMOVE EXISTING CONCRETE WITHOUT DISTURBING BASE MATERIAL P D -11- 0 0 6 L AND INSTALL 3TO4' OF COARSE ORGANIC MULCH. REPLACE GRAVEL AT BASE OF TREE WITH ORGANIC MULCH. SEE TREE NOTES SHEET L3. A & S) ORDINANCE ORDINANCE OF THE TOWN OF LOS GATOS AMENDING THE TOWN CODE EFFECTING A ZONE CHANGE FROM R-11) & C-2 TO R-1D:PD FOR PROPERTY AT 219 BEAN AVENUE (APNs 510-44-028, 510-44-083, & 510-44-084) THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF LOS GATOS DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I The Town Code of the Town of Los Gatos is hereby amended to change the zoning and supersede Resolution 1985-47 on property at 219 Bean Avenue (Santa Clara County Assessor Parcel Numbers 510-44-028, 510-44-083, & 510-44-084) as shown on the map attached hereto as Exhibit A, and is part of this Ordinance, from R-1D (Single -Family Residential, Downtown) and C-2 (Central Business District) to R-1D:PD (Single -Family Residential, Downtown, Planned Development). SECTION II The PD (Planned Development Overlay) zone established by this Ordinance authorizes the following: 1. Church and school services, uses, and activities. 2. Construction of a two-story, 34'-2" tall, 14,136 square foot junior high school building; covered seating area; 1,200 square foot addition to the lower school building; and church - related residential structure. 3. Landscaping, parking, and other site improvements shown and required on the Official Development Plans attached hereto as Exhibit C. 4. Uses as described in the applicant's letter attached hereto as Exhibit B. 5. Lot merger between APNs 510-44-028 & 510-44-084. 6. Superseding Resolution 1985-47 adopting Conditional Use Permit U-84-017. 7. Uses permitted are those specified in the underlying R-11) (Single -Family Residential, Downtown) zone by Sections 29.40.725 (Permitted Uses) and 29.20.185 (Conditional Uses) of the Zoning Ordinance, as those sections exist at the time of the adoption of this Ordinance, or as they may be amended in the future, subject to any restrictions or other Page 1 of 25 requirements specified elsewhere in this ordinance including, but not limited to, the Official Development Plan. However, no use listed in Section 29.20.185 is allowed unless specifically authorized by this Ordinance, or by Conditional Use Permit. SECTION III COMPLIANCE WITH OTHER DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS All provisions of the Town Code apply, except when the Official Development Plan specifically shows otherwise. SECTION IV Architecture and Site approval is required before construction and site improvement construction work is performed, whether or not a permit is required for the work and before any permit for construction is issued. Construction permits shall only be in a manner complying with Section 29.80.130 of the Town Code. SECTION V The attached Exhibit A (Map), Exhibit B (Description of Permitted Uses), and Exhibit C Official Development Plans) are part of the Official Development Plan. The following Performance Standards must be complied with prior to issuance of any grading, or construction permits: TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT: Planning Division) 1. MAXIMUM HOURS OF OPERATION: 7:30 am to 9:30 pm, seven days a week. Staff arrival and departure may exceed the hours limitation on a reasonable basis only. On limited occasions, religious services may occur outside these hours as described in the Applicant's Proposal (Exhibit B). 2. PERMITTED USES: Approved uses are ministry services for all ages, elementary school grades K through 5), and junior high school (grades 6 through 8), and those described in the applicant's proposal attached hereto as Exhibit B, including Community Use of Facilities. Page 2 of 25 The school activities operate between late -August to mid -June. The use may make its facilities available to businesses, neighborhood, and community groups for holding meetings and similar activities. Uses of the church may include ministry services for all ages and church related residential uses (such as a rectory). Uses of the school may include a library and after school care center. 3. SPECIAL EVENTS: Special events are permitted with the approval of a special event permit from the Town of Los Gatos Police Department. 4. ARCHITECTURE AND SITE APPROVAL REQUIRED: Where applicable, a separate Architecture and Site application (A&S) shall be required for each phase of the Project. The Development Review Committee shall make the final determination on all A&S applications. 5. MAXIMUM HEIGHT: The maximum height of the junior high school building shall be 34'- 2" feet or less. All other new buildings shall comply with the underlying R-1 D zoning district height standards. 6. NUMBER OF CHURCH SEATS: Maximum number of seats used for worship shall not exceed 654. 7. PARKING: At least 105 parking spaces shall be provided onsite. 8. NUMBER OF STAFF: The maximum number of staff for the church and school combined is limited to 36. 9. NUMBER OF STUDENTS: The maximum number of students is limited to 315. 10. GENERAL: All existing trees shown on the plan and trees required to remain or to be planted are specific subjects of approval of this plan, and must remain on the site. 11. TREE REMOVAL PERMIT: A Tree Removal Permit shall be obtained for any trees to be removed, prior to the issuance of a building or grading permit. 12. TREE FENCING: Protective tree fencing shall be placed at the drip line of existing trees prior to issuance of demolition and building permits and shall remain through all phases of construction. Include a tree protection fencing plan with the construction plans. 13. ARBORIST RECOMMENDATIONS: All recommendations made by the Town's Consulting Arborist, Deborah Ellis, shall be implemented to eliminate or minimize construction -related impacts on the trees to be retained. Recommendations are listed in the May 1, 2012, October 17, 2012, and January 10, 2013, arborist's reports. The report also provides recommendations for Protection Measures before and during development, Page 3 of 25 encompassing fencing, removal of hardscape, demolition, work within tree canopies, etc. Tree protection specifications shall be printed on the construction plans. A Compliance Memorandum shall be prepared by the applicant and submitted with the building permit application detailing how the recommendations have or will be addressed. These recommendations must be incorporated in the building permit plans, and completed prior to issuance of a building permit where applicable. 14. RECYCLING: All wood, metal, glass and aluminum materials generated from the demolished structure shall be deposited to a company which will recycle the materials. Receipts from the company(s) accepting these materials, noting type and weight of material, shall be submitted to the Town prior to the Towns demolition inspection. 15. PARKING AND COMMUTING: The parish and school shall continue the communication program educating the parish community about parking options, asking school families to rideshare, and parishioners and their guests to be sensitive to the needs and concerns of the neighborhood residents. 16. LANDSCAPE WATER EFFICIENCY: This project is subject to the Town's Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance, Chapter 26, Article IV of the Town Code or the State Water Efficiency Ordinance, whichever is more restrictive. A fee as established by Town Council resolution shall be paid when the landscape, irrigation plans, and water calculations are submitted for review prior to the issuance of building permit. 17. TOWN INDEMNITY: Applicants are notified that Town Code Section 1.10.115 requires that any applicant who receives a permit or entitlement from the Town shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the Town and its officials in any action brought by a third party to overturn, set aside, or void the permit or entitlement. This requirement is a condition of approval of all such permits and entitlements whether or not expressly set forth in the approval, and may be secured to the satisfaction of the Town Attorney. Building Division) IS. PERMITS REQUIRED: A building permit shall be required for the construction of the new Jr. High School building and a separate building permit to modify the existing Grammar Page 4 of 25 School building. Separate permits are required for electrical, mechanical, and plumbing work as necessary. 19. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: The Conditions of Approval must be blue -lined in full on the cover sheet of the construction plans. A Compliance Memorandum shall be prepared and submitted with the building permit application detailing how the Conditions of Approval will be addressed. 20. SIZE OF PLANS: Four sets of construction plans, maximum size 24" x 36." 21. SOILS REPORT: A soils report, prepared to the satisfaction of the Building Official, containing foundation and retaining wall design recommendations is required to be submitted with the building permit application. This report shall be prepared by a licensed civil engineer specializing in soils mechanics. 22. FOUNDATION INSPECTIONS: A pad certificate prepared by a licensed civil engineer or land surveyor shall be submitted to the project building inspector at foundation inspection. This certificate shall certify compliance with the recommendations as specified in the soils report and that the building pad elevation, on -site retaining wall locations and elevations have been prepared according to approved plans. Horizontal and vertical controls shall be set and certified by a licensed surveyor or registered civil engineer for the following items: a. Building pad elevation b. Finish floor elevation c. Foundation corner locations d. Retaining Walls 23. BACKWATER VALVE: The scope of this project may require the installation of a sanitary sewer backwater valve per Town Ordinance 6.50.025. Please provide information on the plans if a backwater valve is required and the location of the installation. The Town of Los Gatos Ordinance and West Valley Sanitation District (WVSD) requires backwater valves on drainage piping serving fixtures that have flood level rims less than 12-inches above the elevation of the next upstream manhole. 24. TITLE 24 — COMMERCIAL: The buildings shall be comply with the latest California Title 24 Accessibility Standards. Necessary work shall be first investigated by the design Architect, then confirmed by Town staff. Page 5 of 25 25. SPECIAL INSPECTIONS: When a special inspection is required by CBC Section 1704, the Architect or Engineer of record shall prepare an inspection program that shall be submitted to the Building Official for approval prior to issuance of the building permit. The Town Special Inspection form must be completely filled -out, signed by all requested parties, and be blue - lined on the construction plans. Special Inspection forms are available from the Building Division Service Counter or online at www.losgatosca.gov/building 26. NONPOINT SOURCE POLLUTION STANDARDS SHEET: The Town standard Santa Clara County Valley Nonpoint Source Pollution Control Program Sheet (or Clean Bay Sheet 2406) shall be part of the plan submittal as the second page. The specification sheet is available at the Building Division Service Counter for a fee of $2 or at San Jose Blue Print for a fee. 27. NPDES-C.3 DATA FORM: A copy of the NPDES C.3 Data Form (updated based on the final construction drawings) must be blue -lined in full on the plans. In the event that this data differs significantly from any Planning approvals, the Town may require recertification of the project's storm water treatment facilities prior to release of the Building Permit. 28. PLANS: The construction plans shall be prepared under the direct supervision of a licensed Architect or Engineer. (Business and Professionals Code Section 5538) 29. APPROVALS REQUIRED: The project requires the following departments and agencies approval before issuing a building permit: a. Community Development -Planning Division: Jennifer Savage at (408) 399-5702 b. Engineering/Parks & Public Works Department: Maziar Bozorginia at 395-3460 c. Santa Clara County Fire Department: (408) 378-4010 d. West Valley Sanitation District: (408) 378-2407 e. Local School District: The Town will forward the paperwork to the appropriate school district(s) for processing. A copy of the paid receipt is required prior to permit issuance. 30. *AIR QUALITY MITIGATION MEASURE-1: Basic construction measures. To limit the project's construction -related dust and criteria pollutant emissions, the following BAAQMD- recommended Basic Construction Mitigation Measures shall be included in the project's grading plan, building plans, and contract specifications: Page 6 of 25 a. All exposed surfaces (e.g., parking areas, staging areas, soil piles, graded areas, and unpaved access roads) shall be watered two times per day. b. All haul trucks transporting soil, sand, or other loose material off -site shall be covered. c. All visible mud or dirt track -out onto adjacent public roads shall be removed using wet power vacuum street sweepers at least once per day. The use of dry power sweeping is prohibited. d. All vehicle speeds on unpaved roads shall be limited to 15 mph. e. All roadways, driveways, and sidewalks to be paved shall be completed as soon as possible. f. Idling times shall be minimized either by shutting equipment off when not in use or reducing the maximum idling time to five minutes (as required by the California airborne toxics control measure Title 13, Section 2485 of California Code of Regulations [CCR]). Clear signage shall be provided for construction workers at all access points. g. All construction equipment shall be maintained and properly tuned in accordance with manufacturer's specifications. All equipment shall be checked by a certified mechanic and determined to be running in proper condition prior to operation. h. Post a publicly visible sign with the telephone number and person to contact at the Town regarding dust complaints. This person shall respond and take corrective action within 48 hours. The BAAQMD's phone number shall also be visible to ensure compliance with applicable regulations. 31. *CULTURAL RESOURCES MITIGATION MEASURE-1: Alert Construction Personnel. Construction personnel involved with earthmoving shall be alerted to the potential for the discovery of prehistoric materials and in particular, concentrations of historic artifacts. Prehistoric archaeological resources could include but not be limited to the following: darker than surrounding soils of a friable nature, concentrations of stone, bone or fresh water shellfish, artifacts of these materials, and evidence of fire (ash, charcoal, fire altered earth or rock) and of course, burials, both human and animal. Page 7 of 25 32. *CULTURAL RESOURCES MITIGATION MEASURE-2: Halt of Construction If Archaeological Traces Are Encountered. In the event that archaeological traces are encountered, all construction within a 20-foot radius of the find shall be halted, the Community Development Director shall be notified, and an archaeologist shall be retained to examine the find and make appropriate recommendations. 33. *CULTURAL RESOURCES MITIGATION MEASURE-3: Plan for Eligible Resources. In the event that it appears further earthmoving will affect a resource eligible for the California Register of Historic Resource (CRHR), a plan for evaluation of the resource through limited hand excavation should be submitted to the Town's Community Development Department for approval. If evaluative testing demonstrates that the project will affect a CRHR eligible resource, a plan for the mitigation of impacts to the resource should be submitted to the Community Development Department for approval before construction is allowed inside the zone designated as archaeologically sensitive. 34. *CULTURAL RESOURCES MITIGATION MEASURE-4: Preliminary Archaeological Report. If the Community Development Director finds that the archaeological find is not a significant resource, work will resume only after the submittal of a preliminary archaeological report and after provisions for reburial and ongoing monitoring are accepted. Provisions for identifying descendants of a deceased Native American and for reburial will follow the protocol set forth in CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5(e). If the site is found to be a significant archaeological site, a mitigation program will be prepared and submitted to the Community Development Director for consideration and approval, in conformance with the protocol set forth in Public Resources Code Section 21083.2. 35. *CULTURAL RESOURCES MITIGATION MEASURE-5: Final Archaeological Report. A final report shall be prepared when a find is determined to be a significant archaeological site, and/or when Native American remains are found on the site. The final report will include background information on the completed work, a description and list of identified resources, the disposition and curation of these resources, any testing, other recovered information, and conclusions. 36. *HAZARDS MITIGATION MEASURE-1: Abatement of Lead -Based Paints. Prior to proposed building demolition, construction finish materials that are suspect for containing lead -based paint will be tested, and pending laboratory analysis, will not be subjected to any Page 8 of 25 process which renders them friable unless proper engineering controls and worker protection procedures are initiated. 37. *NOISE MITIGATION MEASURE-1: Noise Barrier. To reduce excess noise from the playfield activity at the residence at 30 Tait Avenue, the project applicant will construct a six-foot high solid board fence along the property line between the playfield and the home at 30 Tait Avenue. The barrier height is in reference to the nearest playfield ground elevation. Figure 3 of Attached 5 of the Initial Study delineates the location of the noise control barrier. The fence will be constructed of minimum 1-inch thick (nom.) redwood boards nailed tight such that no gaps are visible. Cracks, gaps, knotholes are no permitted. No openings are permitted between the upper fence components and the ground. 38. *NOISE MITIGATION MEASURE-2: Recommended Construction Measures. Although there would be no significant noise impact under CEQA or construction -related noise mitigation required under CEQA, project -related demolition and construction noise at the site could be reduced by using quiet or "new technology" equipment. The greatest potential for noise abatement of current equipment should be the quieting of exhaust noise by use of improved mufflers. It is recommended that all internal combustion engines used at the project site be equipped with a type of muffler recommended by the vehicle manufacturer. In addition, all equipment should be in good mechanical condition so as to minimize noise created by faulty or poorly maintained engine, drive -train and other components. Demolition and construction noise could also be mitigated by the following: a. Schedule construction operations that comply with the limits of the Town of Los Gatos Noise Ordinance. b. Limit the use of equipment close to sensitive receptor properties. c. Utilizing temporary berms or noise barriers, such as lumber or other material stockpiles and the construction trailers or other non -noisy long -tern structures. d. Place long-term stationary equipment as far away from the residential areas as possible. e. Keep mobile equipment (haul trucks, concrete trucks, etc.) off of local streets as much as possible. f. A noise reduction benefit can also be achieved by appropriate selection of equipment utilized for various operations, subject to equipment availability and cost Page 9 of 25 considerations, the following recommendations for minimizing impacts on the surrounding area are offered: i. Earth Removal: Use scrapers as much as possible for earth removal, rather than the noisier loaders and hauling trucks. ii. Ground Preparation: Use a motor grader rather than a bulldozer for final grading. iii. Building Construction: Power saws should be shielded or enclosed where practical to decrease noise emissions. Nail guns should be used where possible as they are less noisy than manual hammering. iv. Generators and Compressors: Use generators and compressors that are housed in acoustical enclosures rather than weather enclosures or none at all. TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE DIRECTOR OF PARKS AND PUBLIC WORKS: Engineering Division) 39. GENERAL: All public improvements shall be made according to the latest adopted Town Standard Drawings and the Town Standard Specifications. All work shall conform to the applicable Town ordinances. The adjacent public right-of-way shall be kept clear of all job related dirt and debris at the end of the day. Dirt and debris shall not be washed into storm drainage facilities. The storing of goods and materials on the sidewalk and/or the street will not be allowed unless a special permit is issued. The developer's representative in charge shall be at the job site during all working hours. Failure to maintain the public right-of-way according to this condition may result in the Town performing the required maintenance at the developer's expense. 40. ENCROACHMENT PERMIT: All work in the public right-of-way will require a Construction Encroachment Permit. All work over $5,000 will require construction security. It is the responsibility of the applicant/developer to obtain any necessary encroachment permits from affected agencies and private parties, including but not limited to, Pacific Gas and Electric (PG&E), SBC, Comcast, Santa Clara Valley Water District, California Department of Transportation. Copies of any approvals or permits must be submitted to the Town Engineering Department prior to releasing of any permit. Page 10 of 25 41. PUBLIC WORKS INSPECTIONS: The developer or his representative shall notify the Engineering Inspector at least twenty-four (24) hours before starting any work pertaining to on -site drainage facilities, grading or paving, and all work in the Town's right-of-way. Failure to do so will result in rejection of work that went on without inspection. 42. RESTORATION OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS: The developer shall repair or replace all existing improvements not designated for removal that are damaged or removed because of developer's operations. Improvements such as, but not limited to: curbs, gutters, sidewalks, driveways, signs, pavements, raised pavement markers, thermoplastic pavement markings, etc. shall be repaired and replaced to a condition equal to or better than the original condition. Existing improvement to be repaired or replaced shall be at the direction of the Engineering Construction Inspector, and shall comply with all Title 24 Disabled Access provisions. Developer shall request a walk-through with the Engineering Construction Inspector before the start of construction to verify existing conditions. 43. SITE SUPERVISION: The General Contractor shall provide qualified supervision on the job site at all times during construction. 44. STREET/SIDEWALK CLOSURE: Any proposed blockage or partial closure of the sidewalk requires an encroachment permit. Special provisions such as limitations on works hours, protective enclosures, or other means to facilitate public access in a safe manner may be required. 45. PLAN CHECK FEES: Plan check fees shall be deposited with the Town prior to plan review at the Engineering Division of the Parks and Public Works Department 46. INSPECTION FEES: Inspection fees shall be deposited with the Town prior to issuance of any Permit or recordation of the Final Map. 47. DESIGN CHANGES: Any proposed changes to the approved plans shall be subject to the approval of the Town prior to altered work is started. The Applicant Project Engineer shall notify, in writing, the Town Engineer at least 72 hours in advance of all the proposed changes. Any approved changes shall be incorporated into the final "as -built" plans. 48. PLANS AND STUDIES: All required plans and studies shall be prepared by a Registered Professional Engineer in the State of California, and submitted to the Town Engineer for review and approval. Page 11 of 25 49. GRADING PERMIT: Grading permit is required for all site grading and drainage work except for exemptions listed in Section 12.20.015 of the Town Grading Ordinance. The grading permit application (with grading plans) shall be made to the Engineering Division of the Parks & Public Works Department located at 41 Miles Avenue. The grading plans shall include final grading, drainage, retaining wall location, driveway, utilities and interim erosion control. Grading plans shall list earthwork quantities and a table of existing and proposed impervious areas. Unless specifically allowed by the Director of Parks and Public Works, the grading permit will be issued concurrently with the building permit. The grading permit is for work outside the building footprint(s). A separate building permit, issued by the Building Department on E. Main Street is needed for grading within the building footprint. 50. CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT: Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, it shall be the sole responsibility of the owner/applicant to obtain any and all proposed or required easements and/or permissions necessary to perform the grading herein proposed. Proof of agreement/approval is required prior to issuance of any Permit. 51. DRAINAGE STUDY: Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, the following drainage studies shall be submitted to and approved by the Town Engineer: A drainage study of the project including diversions, off -site areas that drain onto and/or through the project, and justification of any diversions; a drainage study evidencing that proposed drainage patterns will not overload existing storm drains; and detailed drainage studies indicating how the project grading, in conjunction with the drainage conveyance systems including applicable swales, channels, street flows, catch basins, storm drains, and flood water retarding, will allow building pads to be safe from inundation from rainfall runoff which may be expected from all storms up to and including the theoretical 100-year flood. 52. TREE REMOVAL: Copies of all necessary tree removal permits shall be provided prior to issuance of a grading permit/building permit. 53. SURVEYING CONTROLS: Horizontal and vertical controls shall be set and certified by a licensed surveyor or registered civil engineer qualified to practice land surveying, for the following items: a. Retaining wall --top of wall elevations and locations b. Toe and top of cut and fill slopes Page 12 of 25 54. PAD CERTIFICATION: A letter from a licensed land surveyor shall be provided stating that the building foundation was constructed in accordance with the approved plans shall be provided subsequent to foundation construction and prior to construction on the structure. The pad certification shall address both vertical and horizontal foundation placement. 55. PRECONSTRUCTION MEETING: Prior to issuance of any permit or the commencement of any site work, the general contractor shall: a. Along with the project applicant, attend a pre -construction meeting with the Town Engineer to discuss the project conditions of approval, working hours, site maintenance and other construction matters; b. Acknowledge in writing that they have read and understand the project conditions of approval, and will make certain that all project sub- contractors have read and understand them prior to commencing work and that a copy of the project conditions of approval will be posted on site at all times during construction. 56. RETAINING WALLS: A building permit, issued by the Building Department at 110 E. Main Street, may be required for site retaining walls. Walls are not reviewed or approved by the Engineering Division of Parks and Public Works during the grading permit plan review process. 57. CERTIFICATE OF LOT MERGER: A Certificate of Lot Merger shall be recorded. Two copies of the legal description for exterior boundary of the merged parcel and a plat map (8- in. X 11 in.) shall be submitted to the Engineering Division of the Parks & Public Works Department for review and approval. The submittal shall include closure calculations, title reports less than 90 days old and the appropriate fee. The certificate shall be recorded before any permits may be issued. 58. SOILS REPORT: One copy of the soils report shall be submitted with the grading permit application. The soils report shall include specific criteria and standards governing site grading, drainage, pavement design, retaining wall design and erosion control. The reports shall be signed and "wet stamped" by the engineer or geologist, in conformance with Section 6735 of the California Business and Professions Code. 59. SOILS REVIEW: Prior to issuance of any pennit, the applicant's soils engineer shall review the final grading and drainage plans to ensure that designs for foundations, retaining walls, Page 13 of 25 site grading, and site drainage are in accordance with their recommendations and the peer review comments. The applicant's soils engineer's approval shall then be conveyed to the Town either by letter or by signing the plans. 60. SOILS ENGINEER CONSTRUCTION OBSERVATION: During construction, all excavations and grading shall be inspected by the applicant's soils engineer prior to placement of concrete and/or backfill so they can verify that the actual conditions are as anticipated in the design -level geotechnical report, and recommend appropriate changes in the recommendations contained in the report, if necessary. The results of the construction observation and testing should be documented in an "as -built" letter/report prepared by the applicants' soils engineer and submitted to the Town before final release of any occupancy permit is granted. 61. WATER DESIGN: Water plans prepared by SJWC must be reviewed and approved prior to issuance of any permit. 62. FRONTAGE IMPROVEMENTS: Applicant shall be required to improve the project's public frontage to current Town Standards. These improvements may include but not limited to curb, gutter, sidewalk, driveway approaches, curb ramps, traffic signal, street lighting upgrade and/or repaint) etc. 63. UTILITIES: The Developer shall install all new, relocated, or temporarily removed utility services, including telephone, electric power and all other communications lines underground, as required by Town Code Section 27.50.015(b). All new utility services shall be placed underground. Underground conduit shall be provided for cable television service. Applicant is required to obtain approval of all proposed utility alignments from any and all utility service providers. The Town of Los Gatos does not approve or imply approval for final alignment or design of these facilities. 64. SIDEWALK CLOSURE: Any proposed blockage or partial closure of the sidewalk requires an encroachment permit. Special provisions such as limitations on works hours, protective enclosures, or other means to facilitate public access in a safe manner may be required. 65. SIDEWALK REPAIR: The developer shall repair and replace to existing Town standards any sidewalk damaged now or during construction of this project. Sidewalk repair shall match existing color, texture and design, and shall be constructed per Town Standard Details. Page 14 of 25 The limits of sidewalk repair will be determined by the Engineering Construction Inspector during the construction phase of the project. 66. CURB AND GUTTER: The developer shall repair and replace to existing Town standards any curb and gutter damaged now or during construction of this project. New curb and gutter shall be constructed per Town Standard Details. The limits of curb and gutter repair will be determined by the Engineering Construction Inspector during the construction phase of the project. 67. DRIVEWAY APPROACH: The developer shall install commercial driveway approach. The new driveway approach shall be constructed per Town Standard Details. 68. FENCING: Any fencing proposed within 200-feet of an intersection shall comply with Town Code Section §23.10.080. 69. SIGHT TRIANGLE AND TRAFFIC VIEW AREA: Any proposed improvements, including but not limiting to trees and hedges, will need to abide by Town Code Section 23.10.080, 26.10.065, 29.40.030. 70. AS -BUILT PLANS: After completion of the construction of all work, the original plans shall have all changes (change orders and field changes) clearly marked. The "as -built" plans shall again be signed and "wet -stamped" by the civil engineer who prepared the plans, attesting to the changes. The original "as -built" plans shall be review and approved the Engineering Inspector. A Mylar and AutoCAD disk of the approved "as -built" plans shall be provided to the Town before the Faithful Performance Security or Occupancy Permit is released. The AutoCAD file shall include only the following information and shall conform to the layer naming convention: a) Building Outline, Layer: BLDG-OUTLINE; b) Driveway, Layer: DRIVEWAY; c) Retaining Wall, Layer: RETAINING WALL; d) Swimming Pool, Layer: SWIMMING -POOL; e) Tennis Court, Layer: TENNIS -COURT; f) Property Line, Layer: PROPERTY -LINE; g) Contours, Layer: NEWCONTOUR. All as -built digital files must be on the same coordinate basis as the Town's survey control network and shall be submitted in AutoCAD version 2000 or higher. 71. TRAFFIC STUDY: Any development of land use that generates greater traffic impacts than those assumed in the St. Mary's School Expansion Traffic Study (dated July 12, 2012) shall require an updated traffic study utilizing a methodology approved by the Town. The Town Page 15 of 25 may impose additional conditions on the applicant or development based on the updated Town -approved traffic study. 72. CONSTRUCTION TRAFFIC: All construction traffic and related vehicular routes shall be submitted for review and approval by the Town Engineer prior to issuance of permit. 73. TRAFFIC IMPACT MITIGATION FEE: The developer shall pay a fee proportional to the project's share of transportation improvement needed to serve cumulative development within the Town of Los Gatos. The fee amount will be based upon the Town Council resolution in effect at the time the building permit application is made. The fee shall be paid before the building permit is issued. The traffic impact mitigation fee for this project, using the current fee schedule and the preliminary plans is $11,494.98. The final fee shall be calculated from the final plans using the rate schedule in effect at the time of the building permit application, using a trip generation rate based on commercial use. 74. TRAFFIC IMPACT COMMUNITY BENEFIT: The developer is required to provide Community Benefit based on the Town Traffic Impact Policy. 75. CONSTRUCTION STREET PARKING: No vehicle having a manufacture's rated gross vehicle weight exceeding ten thousand (10,000) pounds shall be allowed to park on the portion of a street which abuts property in a residential zone without prior to approval from the Town Engineer. 76. TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN: The project sponsor will be required to work with the Engineering Division of the Parks and Public Works Department to develop a traffic control plan for incorporation into the construction bid documents (specifications), and this plan will include, but not be limited to, the following measures: a. Construction activities shall be strategically timed and coordinated to minimize traffic disruption for schools, residents, businesses, special events, and other projects in the area. The schools located on the haul route shall be contacted to help with the coordination of the trucking operation to minimize traffic disruption. b. Flag persons shall be placed at locations necessary to control one-way traffic flow. All flag persons shall have the capability of communicating with each other to coordinate the operation. Page 16 of 25 c. Prior to construction, advance notification of all affected residents and emergency services shall be made regarding one-way operation, specifying dates and hours of operation. 77. HAULING OF SOIL: Hauling of soil on or off -site shall not occur during the morning or evening peak periods (between 7:00 a.m. and 9:00 a.m. and between 4:00 p.m. and 6:00 p.m.). Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the developer shall work with the Town Building and Engineering Department Engineering Inspectors to devise a traffic control plan to ensure safe and efficient traffic flow under periods when soil is hauled on or off the project site. This may include, but is not limited to provisions for the developer/owner to place construction notification signs noting the dates and time of construction and hauling activities, or providing additional traffic control. Coordination with other significant projects in the area may also be required. Cover all trucks hauling soil, sand, and other loose debris or require all trucks to maintain at least two feet of freeboard. 78. CONSTRUCTION NOISE: Between the hours of 8:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m., weekdays and 9:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. weekends and holidays, construction, alteration or repair activities shall be allowed. No individual piece of equipment shall produce a noise level exceeding eighty-five 85) dBA at twenty-five (25) feet. If the device is located within a structure on the property, the measurement shall be made at distances as close to twenty-five (25) feet from the device as possible. The noise level at any point outside of the property plane shall not exceed eighty-five (85) dBA. 79. CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT PLAN: The Applicant shall submit a construction management plan that shall incorporate at a minimum the Earth Movement Plan, Traffic Control Plan, Project Schedule, site security fencing, employee parking, construction staging area, construction trailer, and proposed outhouse locations. 80. WVSD (West Valley Sanitation District): Sanitary sewer laterals are televised by West Valley Sanitation District and approved by the Town of Los Gatos before they are used or reused. Sanitary Sewer Clean -out is required for each property at the property line or location specify by the Town. 81. SANITARY SEWER BACKWATER VALVE: Drainage piping serving fixtures which have flood level rims less than twelve (12) inches (304.8 imn) above the elevation of the next upstream manhole and/or flushing inlet cover at the public or private sewer system serving Page 17 of 25 such drainage piping shall be protected from backflow of sewage by installing an approved type backwater valve. Fixtures above such elevation shall not discharge through the backwater valve, unless first approved by the Administrative. The Town shall not incur any liability or responsibility for damage resulting from a sewer overflow where the property owner or other person has failed to install a backwater valve as defined in the Uniform Plumbing Code adopted by the Town and maintain such device in a functional operation condition. Evidence of West Sanitation District's decision on whether a backwater device is needed shall be provided prior to issuance of a building permit. 82. BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES (BMP's): Best Management Practices (BMPs) shall be maintained and be placed for all areas that have been graded or disturbed and for all material, equipment and/or operations that need protection. Removal of BMPs (temporary removal during construction activities) shall be placed at the end of each working day. 83. STORMWATER DEVELOPMENT RUNOFF: All new development and redevelopment projects subject to the Stormwater development runoff requirements. Every applicant shall submit a stormwater control plan and implement conditions of approval that reduce stormwater pollutant discharges through the construction, operation and maintenance of treatment measures and other appropriate source control and site design measures. Increases in runoff volume and flows shall be managed in accordance with the development runoff requirements 84. SITE DESIGN MEASURES: All projects must incorporate the following measures to the maximum extent practicable: a. Protect sensitive areas and minimize changes to the natural topography. b. Minimize impervious surface areas. c. Direct roof downspouts to vegetated areas where feasible. d. Use permeable pavement surfaces where feasible. e. Use landscaping to treat stormwater. 85. DUST CONTROL: Blowing dust shall be reduced by timing construction activities so that paving and building construction begin as soon as possible after completion of grading, and by landscaping disturbed soils as soon as possible. Further, water trucks shall be present and in use at the construction site. All portions of the site subject to blowing dust shall be watered as often as deemed necessary by the Town, or a minimum of three times daily, or Page 18 of 25 apply (non -toxic) soil stabilizers on all unpaved access roads, parking areas, and staging areas at construction sites in order to insure proper control of blowing dust for the duration of the project. Watering on public streets shall not occur. Streets will be cleaned by street sweepers or by hand as often as deemed necessary by the Town Engineer, or at least once a day. Watering associated with on -site construction activity shall take place between the hours of 8 a.m. and 5 p.m. and shall include at least one late -afternoon watering to minimize the effects of blowing dust. All public streets soiled or littered due to this construction activity shall be cleaned and swept on a daily basis during the workweek to the satisfaction of the Town. Demolition or earthwork activities shall be halted when wind speeds instantaneous gusts) exceed 25 MPH. All trucks hauling soil, sand, or other loose debris shall be covered. 86. CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES: All construction shall conform to the latest requirements of the CASQA Stormwater Best Management Practices Handbooks for Construction Activities and New Development and Redevelopment, the ABAG Manual of Standards for Erosion & Sediment Control Measures, the Town's grading and erosion control ordinance and other generally accepted engineering practices for erosion control as required by the Town Engineer when undertaking construction activities. 87. SITE DRAINAGE: Rainwater leaders shall be discharged to splash blocks. No through curb drains will be allowed. Any storm drain inlets (public or private) directly connected to public storm system shall be stenciled/signed with appropriate "NO DUMPING - Flows to Bay" NPDES required language. On -site drainage systems for all projects shall include one of the alternatives included in section C.3.i of the Municipal Regional NPDES Permit. These include storm water reuse via cisterns or rain barrels, directing runoff from impervious surfaces to vegetated areas and use of permeable surfaces. If dry wells are to be used they shall be placed 10' minimum from adjacent property line and/or right of way. 88. STORM WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN: A storm water management shall be included with the grading permit application for all Group 1 and Group 2 projects as defined in the amended provisions C.3 of the Municipal Regional Stormwater NPDES Permit, Order R2- 2009-074. The plan shall delineate source control measures and BMP's together with the sizing calculations. The plan shall be certified by a professional pre -qualified by the Town. In the event that storm water measures proposed on the Planning approval differ significantly Page 19 of 25 from those certified on the Building/Grading Permit, the Town may require a modification of the Planning approval prior to release of the Building Permit. The applicant may elect to have the Planning submittal certified to avoid this possibility. 89. AGREEMENT FOR STORMWATER BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE OBLIGATIONS: The property owner shall enter into an agreement with the Town for maintenance of the stormwater filtration devices required to be installed on this project by Town's Stormwater Discharge Permit and all current amendments or modifications. The agreement will specify that certain routine maintenance shall be performed by the property owner and will specify device maintenance reporting requirements. The agreement will also specify routine inspection requirements, permits and payment of fees. The agreement shall be recorded prior to release of any occupancy permits. 90. SILT AND MUD IN PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY: It is the responsibility of contractor and home owner to make sure that all dirt tracked into the public right-of-way is cleaned up on a daily basis. Mud, silt, concrete and other construction debris SHALL NOT be washed into the Town's storm drains. 91. GREASE TRAPS: Meet all requirements of the Santa Clara County Health Department and West Valley Sanitation District for the interception, separation or pretreatment of effluent. 92. GOOD HOUSEKEEPING: Good housekeeping practices shall be observed at all times during the course of construction. Superintendence of construction shall be diligently performed by a person or persons authorized to do so at all times during working hours. The storing of goods and/or materials on the sidewalk and/or the street will not be allowed unless a special permit is issued by the Engineering Division. The adjacent public right-of-way shall be kept clear of all job related dirt and debris at the end of the day. Dirt and debris shall not be washed into storm drainage facilities. The storing of goods and materials on the sidewalk and/or the street will not be allowed unless a special permit is issued. The developer's representative in charge shall be at the job site during all working hours. Failure to maintain the public right-of-way according to this condition may result in the Town performing the required maintenance at the developer's expense. 93. UTILITY SETBACKS: House foundations shall be set back from utility lines a sufficient distance to allow excavation of the utility without undermining the house foundation. The Page 20 of 25 Town Engineer shall determine the appropriate setback based on the depth of the utility, input from the project soils engineer, and the type of foundation. 94. NEIGHBORHOOD CONSTRUCTION COMMUNICATION PLAN: The applicant shall initiate a weekly neighborhood e-mail notification program to provide project status updates. The e-mail notices will also be posted on a bulletin board placed in a prominent location along the project perimeter. 95. PERMIT ISSUANCE: Permits for each phase; reclamation, landscape, and grading, shall be issued simultaneously. 96. COVERED TRUCKS: All trucks transporting materials to and from the site shall be covered. 97. FUTURE STUDIES: Any post project traffic or parking counts, or other studies imposed by Planning Commission or Town Council shall be funded by the applicant. TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE SANTA CLARA COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT: 98. FIRE APPARATUS (ENGINE) ACCESS ROADS REQUIRED: Provide access roadways with a paved all weather surface, a minimum unobstructed width of 20 feet, vertical clearance of 13 feet 6 inches, minimum circulating turning radius of 36 feet outside and 23 feet inside, and a maximum slope of 15%. For installation guidelines refer to Fire Department Standards Details and Specifications sheet A-1. 99. FIRE LANE MARKING REQUIRED: Provide marking for all roadways within the project. Markings shall be per fire department specifications. Installations shall also conform to Local Government Standards and Fire Department Standard Details and SpecificationsA-6. 100. FIRE SPRINKLERS REQUIRED: Approved automatic sprinkler systems in new buildings and existing buildings and structures shall be provided in the locations described in this Section or in Sections 903.2.1 through 9032.18 whichever is the more restrictive. For the purposed of this Section, firewalls used to separate building areas shall be constructed in accordance with the California building Code and shall be without openings or penetrations. An automatic fire sprinkler system shall be provided throughout all new buildings and structures. Exception: Group A, B, E, F, I, L, M, S and U occupancy buildings and structures that do not exceed 1,000 square feet of building area and that are not located in the Wild land -Urban Interface Fire Area. Where provisions of this code require that a building or portion thereof be equipped throughout with an automatic sprinkler system in accordance Page 21 of 25 with this section, the sprinklers shall be installed throughout in accordance with NFPA 13 except as provided in Section 903.3.1.1.1 and local standards. For new buildings having no designated use or tenant, the minimum sprinkler design density shall be Ordinary Hazard Group 2. 912.2 Location. With respect to hydrants, driveways, buildings and landscaping, fire department connections shall be so located that fire apparatus and hose connected to supply the system will not obstruct access to the building for other fire apparatus. The location of fire department connections shall be approved by the fire code official. A State of California licensed (C-16) Fire Protection Contractor shall submit plans, calculations, a completed permit application and appropriate fees to the fire department for review and approval prior to beginning their work. 101. POTABLE WATER SUPPLIES: Potable water supplies shall be protected from contamination caused by fire protection water supplies. It is the responsibility of the applicant and any contractors and subcontractors to contact the water purveyor supplying the site of such project, and to comply with the requirements of that purveyor. Such requirements shall be incorporated into the design and any water -based fire protection systems, and/or fire suppression water supply systems or storage containers that may be physically connected in any manner to an appliance capable of causing contamination of the potable water supply of the purveyor of record. Final approval of the system(s) under consideration will not be granted by this office until compliance with the requirements of the water purveyor of record are documented by that purveyor as having been met by the applicant(s). 102. PRIVATE ON -SITE STANDPIPE REQUIRED: Provide one private on -site standpipe installed at a location to be determined by the Fire Department, with a minimum acceptable flow of 1,000 GPM at 20 psi residual pressure. Prior to design, the project civil engineer shall meet with the fire department water supply officer to jointly spot the required fire hydrant locations. 103. EMERGENCY GATE/ACCESS GATE REQUIREMENTS: Gate installations shall conform with Fire Department Standards Details and Specification G-1 and, when opened shall not obstruct any portion of the required width for emergency access roadways or driveways. Locks, if provided, shall be fire department approved prior to installation. Gates across the emergency access roadways shall be equipped with an approved access device. If Page 22 of 25 the gates are operated electrically, an approved Knox key switch shall be installed; if they are operated manually, then approved Knox padlock shall be installed. Gates providing access from a road to a driveway or other roadway shall be at least 30 feet from the road being exited. 104. CONSTRUCTION SITE FIRE SAFETY: All construction sites must comply with applicable provisions of the CFC Chapter 14 and the Fire Department's Standards Detail and Specification SI-7. 105. PREMISES IDENTIFICATION: approved numbers or addresses shall be placed on all new and existing buildings in such a position as to be plainly visible and legible from the street or road fronting the property. Numbers shall contrast with their background. 106. ACCESS TO BUILDINGS/LANDSCAPING REQUIREMENTS: Landscaping shall not obstruct Fire Department ladder access to buildings. The building permit submittal shall include a landscape drawing which reflects the location of all landscaping, to include how Fire Department ladder access will be provided around all buildings. Ground -ladder rescue from second and third floor rooms shall be made possible for fire department operations. With the climbing angle of seventy five degrees maintained, an approximate walkway width along either side of the building shall be no less than seven feet clear. Landscaping shall not be allowed to interfere with the required access. An approved walkway shall be provided on all sides of the building(s) leading from the fire access roadway to the exterior openings of the building(s). 107. ROOF ACCESS: Provision shall be made to allow emergency responder access to all portions of the roof, as approved by the Fire Department. 108. EMERGENCY ACCESS KEY BOX REQUIRED: It is the Santa Clara County Fire Department's policy that a key box be required for buildings that are equipped with fire sprinklers and/or fire alarm systems. This policy will only help facilitate the quick response of emergency crews to the interior of a building. 109. TIMING OF REQUIRED WATER SUPPLY INSTALLATIONS: Installations of required fire service(s) and fire hydrant(s) shall be tested and accepted by the Fire Department, prior to the start of framing or delivery of bulk combustible materials. Building permit issuance may be withheld until required installations are completed, tested, and accepted. Page 23 of 25 110. TIMING OF REQUIRED ROADWAY INSTALLATIONS: Required access roads, up through first lift of asphalt, shall be installed and accepted by the Fire Department prior to the start of combustible construction. During construction, emergency access roads shall be maintained clear and unimpeded. Note that building permit issuance may be withheld until installations are completed. Temporary access roads may be approved on a case by case basis. 111. FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS IN PRIVATE SCHOOLS: An automatic fire alarm system shall be provided in new buildings of private schools. Exception: Automatic detection devices are not required where an approved automatic sprinkler system is installed in accordance with (CFC) Section 903.3.1.1 and the occupant notification appliances will activate on sprinkler water flow and manual activation is provided from a normally occupied location. Required as a Mitigation Measure. Page 24 of 25 SECTION VI This Ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the Town Council of the Town of Los Gatos on , 2013, and adopted by the following vote as an ordinance of the Town of Los Gatos at a meeting of the Town Council of the Town of Los Gatos on 2013 and becomes effective 30 days after it is adopted. COUNCIL MEMBERS: AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: SIGNED: ATTEST: MAYOR OF THE TOWN OF LOS GATOS LOS GATOS, CALIFORNIA CLERK ADMINISTRATOR OF THE TOWN OF LOS GATOS LOS GATOS, CALIFORNIA Page 25 of 25 qV 41 219 qV .a 0 m o Bean Avenue qli C I TOWN OF LOS GATOS I Application No. PD-11-006 A.P.N. #510-44-028, -083, & -084 Change of zoning map amending the Town Zoning Ordinance. Zone Change From: R-1 D & C-2 To: R-1 D: PD Prezonin 0 Forwarded by Planning Commission Approved by Town Council Clerk Administrator: Date: Date: Ord: Mayor: EXHIBIT A Of Exhibit 11 i i 5t. Marys Churck January 14, 2013 Ms. Jennifer Savage RECEIVED TOWN OF LOS GATOS Community Development Department / Planning Division ,W"I 15 2013110E. Main Street Los Gatos, CA 95030 TOWN OF LOS GATOS PLANNING DIVISION RE: St. Mary's Church and School Application for PD Zoning/Lot Line Combination & Architectural Design Review 219 Bean Avenue & 59 Victory Lane Dear Ms. Savage: Attached is our application for the creation of a Planned Development (PD) Zoning District for our various Parish properties in downtown Los Gatos. We have also included supporting documentation for a Lot Line Combination at 59 Victory Lane, Architectural Design Review for a new 2-story Jr. High School Building, and improvements to the existing 1-story `Grammar School' Building. We also seek to update parking/staff/student quotas limited by our current Conditional Use Permit issued in 1985 to reflect our current operations. We thank Town staff for all of the help over the years providing positive guidance and feedback on our various developments and improvements. HISTORY St. Mary's was originally established in Los Gatos as a mission on Santa Cruz Avenue between Main Street and Bean Avenue. In 1912, the small hall used as the church was moved to the corner of Bean and Tait, and St. Mary's was established as a parish in its present location. Two years later the first permanent rectory was built on parish property, and the current church was built in 1962. The school was opened in 1954 and has provided a solid academic education for thousands of students in our community. In 1985, a Conditional Use Permit was issued to St. Mary's Church and School when Lyndon Avenue was converted into a cul de sac, and St. Mary's built its Pastoral Center which includes a multi -purpose room, administrative center, and school and ministry offices. All of the conditions for the approval and guaranteed improvements were made as outlined in Resolution 1985-47. Note that this document references our `baseline' approvals: CUP U-84-17, A&SA S-84-60, and Subdivision Application M-84-21 respectively). We have also used the 59 Victory Lane Building as our Library, Science Lab, 81h grade, Spanish Art classes for many years as part of our overall school operations. During the past 26 years, the church and school have experienced leadership changes of executive staff (pastor and 219 Bean Avenue . Los Gatos, California 95030 408.354.3726 fax 408.354.9302 EXHIBIT B Of Exhibit 11 principal), administrative staff, and volunteer leadership in the parish. Consequently, current management of the church and school were unaware of the existence of the Conditional Use Permit and its restrictions. Once the CUP was called to our attention, we proceeded to gather information to file the application for updating the CUP. PD ZONING / DEVELOPMENT AREA We seek to replace severely aging and outdated facilities to ensure we can deliver a quality education product in modern facilities. The construction of a two story classroom/library building at our eastern property line will allow us to use our current facilities during construction without the use of temporary trailers or rental facilities. Once completed, the demolition of 59 Victory Lane will then allow for replacement of parking/play area. Our existing early 1950's era `Grammar School' is also in need of major restoration and much needed expansion. We seek to create a more distinct Kindergarten area and provide plumbing facilities at each classroom. Complete renovation of the aged restroom facilities would provide compliance with disabled access requirements. The Parish also seeks to retain the option for demolition our existing `Teen Center'. The one- story building on the northeast corner of our campus is approximately 1,000 square feet. It is an aging building that we have used primarily for child care or teen activities for the past few years. In 2009, we received approval from the Town to replace it with a two-story single family home of approximately 3,000-square-feet to serve as the future rectory, the home of the priests who live on campus and serve our parish community. We have attached the future rectory plans for your reference only. Because these plans were completed prior to the design of the new Junior High School building, some modifications to the future rectory plans would be needed to coordinate with the new campus plan. We believe these changes and modifications could be done in the future. Currently the priests reside in a two-story building just east of the church that is also used for parish offices, meeting space and storage. At the existing rectory, 3,035 square feet are used for the priests' residences and 1,085 square feet are used for parish offices, meeting space, and storage. Following construction of the future rectory, the entire existing rectory will be converted to parish office and administrative use. The existing Administrative Building will continue to be used for both school and parish administrative uses. CUP MODIFICATIONS We seek as part of the PD Zoning Process to modify our Conditional Use Permit that describes the level of activity at the church and school that has existed for many years: Condition 13 / Part 1: Student Enrollment in St. Mary's School St. Mary's School has been in operation since 1954, and its enrollment has fluctuated according to population trends and the desire of parents to provide their children with values -based education. Enrollment was at more than 400 in the 1960s when the large Baby Boom generation page 2 overflowed every classroom (private and public). At that time, as many as 50 students were assigned to each of St. Mary's classrooms. When the original Conditional Use Permit was issued in 1985, population trends had changed and there were many fewer students to be accommodated in elementary schools. The student population at that time was 265 students in grades 1-8. Now, the population of school -age children has increased once again and St. Mary's School currently serves 296 students in grades 1-8. In 1999, a local private preschool/kindergarten closed and St. Mary's School added a kindergarten class to help fill this educational void. Public school classrooms in Los Gatos were also filled to overflowing.] St. Mary's added a 35- student kindergarten program in academic year 1999-2000, bringing the total number of current students to 315. We request to update the maximum student enrollment to 315 children. There are no plans to increase student enrollment now or in the future as our facilities will not support them (9 Classrooms x 35 Students/Room = 315 Students) Condition 2 / Part 2: Number of Employees at St. Mary's Church & School The existing CUP states that 20 employees are expected to work at the site. It does not mention how many volunteers routinely worked at the church and school, but we know there were many. We have seen a significant change in the way work is accomplished in churches of all denominations, in all parts of the country. The amount of work has not necessarily increased, but churches are less reliant on volunteers and more dependent on paid staff. Consequently, the number of people working in the office is about the same, but their status has changed from volunteer to employee. When all programs are operating fully St. Mary's Church employs 8 full- time staff and 5 part-time staff (equaling 2.1 FTE). St. Mary's School is a nine -months -a -year operation. It does not offer summer school. The school currently employees 15 full-time staff and 25 part-time staff (equaling 10.6 FTE) One FTE is equal to 40 hours per week. We request that the Conditional Use Permit for St. Mary's Church and School be updated to reflect the 35.7 FTE employees who work here. For parking purposes we will use 36. As demographics and the economy fluctuate, there may be the need in the future for St. Mary's to increase the number of employees as the number of volunteers decreases. Parking Related Information Currently there are a total of 105 parking spaces on the St. Mary's property. There are 72 marked spaces, 3 spaces in the garage, plus room for an additional 30 cars in unmarked spaces in the children's "play area" at the center of campus. In addition, the current 59 Victory Lane property has one on -site parking space and six off -site parking credits. We will continue to provide the one (1) on -site parking space as required for the Downtown Parking district. The existing CUP recognizes the 105 parking spaces as an approved, nonconforming situation, and allows nonconforming church uses to continue interminably. There has been no change to the number of seats in the church (654). We believe there is more than sufficient space to handle parking of employees for both the school and church on a daily operational basis. page 3 In years past, a discussion between a school representative and the Town traffic engineer, it was related by the traffic engineer that the change in the number of employees calculates to fewer than 20 trips and, as a result, does not require a traffic study. When school is not in session, such as during weekend masses or evening religious activities, the blacktop playground is used for parking, bringing the total on -site parking capacity to approximately 105. This parking is self -directed. Our required vehicular access to Victory Lane will be maintained in the proposed work. An ongoing communications program works to educate the parish community about parking options on the St. Mary's property and in adjacent public lots via flyers, bulletin, website www.stmaryslg.or ), meetings such as State of the School and asking school families to ride share. [See attached flyers, webpage and bulletin articles as examples.] Continuing efforts are made to remind parishioners and their guests to be sensitive to the needs and concerns of other residents of the St. Mary's neighborhood. HOURS OF OPERATION 7:30 a.m. to 9:30 p.m., seven days a week. On rare occasions, there will be a need to have a religious service during other hours. For example, after the September 11` h tragedy, some people needed to find comfort with private prayer in the church. There was no formal mass, but the church was opened to the community during other hours. COMMUNITY USE OF FACILITIES In the past, the Town has requested that St. Mary's list the community groups (not affiliated with our religious activities) that use our facilities. These include: Almond Grove Neighborhood Watch meeting(s) Almond Grove Neighborhood Annual Block Party American Red Cross — six times per year, during the day (Blood Drive) Los Gatos Rotary Club — annual event (Crab Feed) Los Gatos Lions — annual event (Cioppino Feed) Handicapables — annual event ICF Polenta Dinner/Dance — twice per year YMCA — annual event (Father Daughter Dance) Country Fair — As you know, the parish also organizes our annual Country Fair one weekend in October. This is an event that is open to the public. The activities of St. Mary's church and school are community benefits. In fact, that is all that we do at St. Mary's — provide our parishioners and the community -at -large with religious programs and services that they desire. On average, the community uses the church and school facilities approximately 13 days per calendar year. As was stated in the original Conditional Use Permit issued by the Town, St. Mary's is "in harmony with the various elements and objectives of the General Plan and the Zoning page 4 Ordinance, because a church is allowed in any zone and this church was there before the Town was incorporated." ARCHITECTURE AND SITE APPLICATION: New Junior High School Building and Lower School Renovation With this application we are requesting Architecture and Site review for the new Junior High School building and for renovations to the existing Lower School building. The scope of work consists of the following: Construction of a new, approximately 13,500 square foot classroom building on the existing campus of St. Mary's parish and school. The building consists of general education classrooms, a breakout room, a science lab, and art classroom, a library and related office spaces. The building is two stories above grade with a standard concrete spread footing foundation system and wood frame construction. The building is occupancy type E, construction type V-B. The building will be equipped throughout with an automatic fire sprinkler system and fire alarm. Partial demolition of one classroom in the existing Lower School building to create a new walkway. No new square footage is added. Demolition of existing one story building at 59 Victory Lane and lot line combination. Construction of a new, approximately 3,000 square foot covered eating area. Site utilities, pedestrian walkways and concrete flatwork to support new development. The site work includes a new masonry wall along the South and East property lines. The wall ranges in height from 6'-0" to 8'-0." The height is needed to maintain security and privacy near the school area of the parish campus. As you know, our kinder playground is adjacent to a public parking lot. The variation in height is due to the existing slope of the site, especially along Victory Lane. We are not requesting Architecture and Site review at this time for the proposed future church - related residential structure or for the addition to the existing Lower School building. SUMMARY We are not requesting an expansion of our property boundaries on increase in number seats in the church, but we do need to replace and update our aging school buildings with modern facilities. We also seek to update our CUP to reflect what currently exists: o Change the number of students in St. Mary's School from 265 to 315 o Change the number of employees for St. Mary's Church and School from 20 to 35.7 FTE employees who work there and reflect the current level of religious programs and activities underway at St. Mary's Church and School that benefit the entire community We believe there is sufficient on -site parking for the number of students and employees, according to the standard school parking formula used by the Town to handle our normal operations. page' 5 As you can see we, have much to accomplish. If you may remember, we had a successful review and construction project for our After -School Care Room in 2009. We worked with the community and Town Staff to mitigate any concerns. The result has been a success for the Parish and Neighborhood. We look forward to meeting with you as soon as you have completed your 30-day Review. Please let us know if there is additional background or detail needed for your review and we will work to provide as diligently as possible. Cordially, Rev. Rick Rodoni Pastor, St. Mary's Parish & School Cc: Sr. Nicki Thomas, Principal, SMS Jeffrey T. Berg, AIA / Steinberg Architects Mr. Ian Abell, Diocese of San Jose Ms. Teri Tucci, SMP Attachment 1: Additional Background: St. Mary's Parish statistics Attachment 2: Parking Flyer, Webpage, Bulletin Articles Attachment 3: Future Rectory Drawings page 6 Attachment 1: ADDITIONAL BACKGROUND We thought it might be helpful to provide some statistics on the growth of the St. Mary's community in the past 27 years. If you would prefer to see year -by -year statistics, please let us know. 1985 1990 1995 2002 2006 2010 Number of 183 194 207 198 212 194 families with is for children at St. 1989, the Mary's School first year info available] Number of students at St. Mary's School 236 262 280 280 280 290 in grades 1-8 Number of Kindergart Kindergart Kindergart 35 students at St. en classes en classes en classes 60% are 35 35 Mary's School in not offered not not siblings) Kindergarten until1999 offered offered until1999 until1999 Number of families 1450 1532 1648 2290 2496 2082 registered as members of St. Mary's Church Average 1581 1351 1614 1752 1445 1373 attendance by per per per per individuals at weekend weekend weekend weekend weekend masses Number of 5 5 5 5 5 5 weekend masses Number of 65 62 65 34 16 15 page 7 weddings at St. Mary's Number of 44 41 38 35 40 19 funerals is for at St. Mary's 1986, the first year info is available] Number of baptisms 93 127 168 191 71 131 at St. Mary's page 8 Be Kirrc{ to, Our Neigh6ors Please remember to use fke designated Parking areas Cnoted Parking is also -available along Bean Avenue a Than you_ ft 6elow)while at St_ Mary ,. on tine St Marys side) . Additional downtown parkng areas are noted' on the reverse side. 6T* -AINK-Y COUNITRY FAIR 4 0- As we know, parking is an issue in our neighbor -- hood. In an effort to alleviate this problem here are some things You can do: C ar ool whenever possiblep Always attempt to use the towns public parking lots first (see map on back) t You can have someone drop You off andt. pick you up IE, n'y 10awalk, ride our bike(s), rollerblade, run, etc. to the Country Fair ST. MARY'S CHURCH LOS GATOS Mass Intentions for the Week Monday, Aug. 21 7:30am Ruth Borre + Tuesday, Aug. 22 7:30am Dr. Ed Marcuz + Wednesday, Aug. 23 7:30am Harold Johnson + Thursday, Aug. 24 7:30am Denes Kassai + Friday, Aug. 25 7:30am Ann Longo + Saturday, Aug. 26 7:30am Francis Hayes + 5:00pm Ted Hertel + Sunday, Aug. 27 7:30 am Arline Petersen + 9:00 am Fred Callis + 11:15 am Kathryn Blanchard + 6:00 pm Parishioners Please place this week's Scripture Readings Aug. 13th) in this box. Thanks.' Be kind to our neighbors In our bulletin on July 31st we inserted a flyer suggesting available parking areas when coming to St. Mary's for mass or any other event here. If you missed the flyer you can find the information on our website: www.churchregistrv.com/smlg. If you have any questions or concerns about parking, please contact Teri Tucci at 354-3726 ext. 37. REPORT ON COLLECTIONS FOR 8/13/2000 Actual: $14,920.53 YTD: $71,684.53 Goal: $16,176.50 YTD: $69,373.14 Variance: $ 1,255.97 YTD: $ 2,31139 REMINDER AUGUST 15 is the feast of the Assumption of the Blessed Virgin Mary. It is a fact that some of the Holy Days have been moved to the next Sunday or are not celebrated. However, the Assumption is still considered as a Holy Day of obligation. Mass will be celebrated at 7:30 a.m. and 7:30 p.m. ATTENTION LECTORS & EUCHARISTIC MINISTERS: We will begin processing the schedule for Oct. -Dec. the last week of August. Contact us at (408) 354-4061 ext. 35 with any necessary "change of status" for inclusion in this schedule. Please check the vestibule of the church for retreat information from the various retreat centers located within our diocese. REGISTRATION INFORMATION If you have recently started attending our parish or have been attending but have never registered, please come by the parish office OR pick up a registration form in the Vestibule. Registering in the parish benefits all of us. We begin to know who you are and you receive general parish mailings and Sunday envelopes. Without specific use of envelopes, it is impossible for us to keep track of any donations you make to the Church. Don't procrastinate. Register today! ATTENTION THE ABATEMENT PROCESS HAS BEGUN IN THE BELL TOWER AND REAR CONFESSIONAL. WE WILL BE CONTINUING WITH THIS PROCESS BEGINNING THIS WEEK. THANK YOU FOR YOUR PATIENCE AS THE CHURCH UNDERGOES THIS CONSTRUCTION PROJECT. ST. MARY'S CHURCH LOS GATO 4 p Mass Intentions for the Week Monday, October 2 7:30am Linnet Loiseau + Tuesday, October 3 7:30am Eduardo San Juan + Wednesday, October 4 7:30am Marge Goldstrom Margaret Bernardo...,_ 9:00 am Anna Michalski Thursday, October 5 7:30am Antonio Alvernaz + Friday, October 6 Alice Winter & Helen Marcotte + Saturday, October 7 7:30am Carmelites + 5:00pm Daoud S. Dinno + Sunday, October 8 7:30 am Dr. William Chaikin + 9:00 am Parishioners 11:15 am George Bernardo, . .,. 6:00 pm Conti Luigia + Be kind to our neighbors ... Please make every effort to park in our parking lots and public parking lot #6 before parking in front of our neighbors' homes. To find out more about where you can park, you can find the information on our website: www.churchregistry.com/smlg. If you have any questions or concerns about parking, please contact Teri Tucci at 354-3726 ext. 37. SERRA CLUB OF SAN JOSE Almighty God, your son Jesus told us to pray for vocations since the harvest is great and the laborers are few. Help all of us who center our Catholic lives in word and sacrament to be active promoters of vocations to the priesthood and religious life. The ministry of identifying any nurturing vocations belongs to each member of each family in our parish family. May we all accept this mission from Jesus with the determination that comes from faith. REPORT ON COLLECTIONS FOR 9/17/2000 AchaaL $16,398.50 YTD: $175,965.46 Goal: $16,176.50 YTD: $194,118.50 variance: $22.00 YTD: ($18,153.04) SPIRITUALLY ENHANCING OPPORTUNITIES Beyond Sunday The most recent "Beyond Sunday" newsletter was mailed to all registered parishioners last week. Additional copies of this newsletter can be found at exits of church and in parish offices. Please consider what activities you can participate in and send in the 'registration form' enclosed in the newsletter. All events are open to parishioners and their family- and friends. All registrants will be placed on the 'attendees list' for the events with contact only if a particular session/series is 'full'. Check date and location for event, show up, and you will be expected! If you have questions call 354-406105. Small Christian Communities Several small faith sharing groups are willing and able to accept new members. Still considering being a part of a group? We'll find the group that meets your scheduling needs ---call 354-4061 x35. Diocese of San Jose Jubilee Celebration Don't forget to check out the information newspaper' at exits of the church on this special catechetical and liturgical event for all Catholics of the diocese on Oct. 28. Registration forms found in the newspaper -type brochure are to be sent directly to diocesan address listed. You will find a variety of topics and may chose the sessions you are most interested in attending. DATES & PLACES TO REMEMBER: September 28, 9:30am, Hofmann Center, "Women of Scriphire" series began; October 18, 7:30pm, Hofinann Center, Forgiveness" series begins. Take Another Look Returning to active participation in the community? We offer all adult Catholics an opportunity to renew their understanding of the beliefs and practices of the Church today. You name the topics of interest, we provide the information. Call 354-4061 ext. 35 and a T.A.L. team member will contact , you. ST. MARY'S CHURCH LOS GATOS Mass Intentions opfortheWeek Monday, November 27 7:30am Linda Zucchelli + Tuesday, November 28 7:30am Peggy Best. special Intention Wednesday, November 29 7:30am Peg Kennedy + Thursday, November 30 7:30am Helen Marcotte + Friday, December 1 7:30am Louise lorillo. spedallarenaon Saturday, December 2 7:30am Carmelites 5:00pm Antonio Alvernaz + Sunday, December 3 7:30 am Eduardo San Juan + 9:00 am Fred Callis + 11: 15 am Beverly Antes + 6:00 pm Paul Macierz + Parishioners PARKING NOTICE New Time Restrictions and Sunday Enforcement Now In Effect•••• As part of the Town of Los Gatos Holiday Parking program, new timed parking restrictions are in effect throughout the downtown area. Please carefully read the parking restrictions on the signs posted near the space each time you park your vehicle to avoid receiving a parking citation. For detailed information about the program and the various parking options available, you can pick up a copy of the 2000 Holiday Parking in Historic Downtown Los Gatos brochure from any merchant, Chamber of Commerce, Town Hall, at Lot 4 from the Valet Parking attendants, or from the driver of the free shuttle bus. SERRA CLUB OF SAN TOSE Parents, Encourage Your Children: To develop their talents and gifts, encourage them to think of Church ministry as a possible and viable life choice. REPORT ON COLLECTIONS FOR 11/19/2000 Actual: $16,405.00 YTD: 315,358.99 Goal: $16,17650 YTD: 323;530.00 Variance: t228.50 YTD: 7,171.01) Schedule for Friday, December 8, 2000 Feast of the Immaculate Conception of Mary The church will be open front 6:30a.m. until 9:00p.m. on this day 7:30 am Mass 9:00 am Mass followed by a reception in Hofmann Center 11:30 am Exposition of the Blessed Sacrament 12:00 pm Mid -day prayer and benediction 3:30-4:30 pm -- Confession 7:30 pm Mass Rachel's Vineyard Retreat - December 8-10, 2000 Struggling with feelings of sadness or loss after abortion? Still seeking peace months or years after the choice? You are not alone. join us December 8-10 in the Russian River Wine Country for a healing weekend retreat. Safe, supportive setting includes sharing, ritual, prayer, sacraments, and memorial service. Facilitated by a team of licensed therapists and others who have walked the journey from pain to healing. Cost is $125 (no one will be denied for financial reasons). Registration required by November 27. Call Familv Life Office, Diocese of Oakland 925) 680-8510. Ask for I fonika or call ext. 4 or obtain an information packet. All inquiries confidential. See also www.rachelsviney r3d.or& On Saturday, December 2nd, we will be decorating the church for the masses of the Advent Season. If you 4 0 have an hour or two to spare anytime OO J between 8:30 a.m. and 12:00 noon that 0 40 day, we would welcome your presence and any assistance you can offer. We will be hanging the Advent wreath and preparinga beautiful worship environment for our parish. We would be pleased to see you and ai1 eo gratefid for any time that you could i 0 spend with us. If you can join us, please call Marianne McGrath at 365-3706. We wish you a blessed and holy Advent. Where to parkatSt. Mary's 4 , and (_ surrounding downtown parking I+A available in Los Gatos L{urcFi 59 VICTORY BUILDING t .cnlc., Blacktop AreaParkingParking available O \ (except during school) 1 l r J Fm c ro*W p SERVILE f Lot 6 Parking co available a duo r oy / 4WC 4EV TE e:, 119 8,,mr {.vnvu, Lot Ganv, C'Wi/nrnia 95030 4118.314.3726 Online Giving Centennial Campaign Mass Times Contact Us St. Alary of t6te sr YI'ZlZ2GZC'Llfate concefJtZOl2 Home About Us i Sacraments & Worship i Faith Formation I Faith in Action Get Involved i St. Marys School Resources Search Site Directions and Parking Search About Us / Directions and Parking Share U is u 9adiman •Pa f ' Pack cif` u t 7 r Gp WoroPa E Lb-N 51 :4Y 02012 Google - r., Map data C 72012 Google - View Larger Map Parkinq Information Download parking map to beprinted) Whara to Park at 5[. Mary'[ and sorroendlnc I*—,—n parldn, -^ avalla6l. In Los Gates 4 V 1 V ' Il o rota G Pni1M M1 -. j 1[ . a.•nrum gill 114It C/ I St. Mary of the Immaculate Conception - 219 Bean Avenue, Los Gatos, CA 408,354.3726 St. Mary School - 30 Lyndon, Los Gatos, CA 408.354.3944 Contact Us Search Site I Site Map I Login powered by eCatholic a division of WEBPRO PRODUCTIONS, LLC R[M!W 0-M-ua C Aalar' GF =oN Jds C4tNrAp : Tdq Slk FyLE'7SS 'W'cl r''1 CdMi AV i'6- cA q 7ze, zcmE S 1-- T'L-AGKS : f F T'F FtAN, N P-I j•COrrGfc9S < IiG- UP'P1 5 A-lVIN 11'21 I.9 -af' TOiPL- U%AW, AFT-_ . 0-M le, -j- I dE jai a IMf'aCV'OtYS/ lj (o4TL. orscnm nuu roc ruo r, r n m4 w.nn lu uw annolnm w a.ntiam nww.oa aurwa arw uo mwuc,wn w a un,NwE yw m ulJ lcwrw u .NyunuwuwwrJ LJwnuuu,mu oY.wJ u uw.0 LLJ I (• FT''pW'.... GC TEh.I I .PAl4- L LJ n I[wi % .rlrFps N LLJs111 a gy g1 SqL SIE•1k3'N'CC Glri•OIN NOTE: Ld-.LlLLLCCLL w j.ijj g IS'hy=[S 7 l UA ... nl NiHt 7e R:Rg*d ea+.Tflb 'Ta 3 yy4 yyyyis INnTloelkyC9agaTt15 n.. S iN tf . ,• _ 3 f 21-'WEW' RE510ENGE PARKING- HOWLEY HALL: - ry in AN AVl `lUC_ ' 5TR5-ET 9GA_f ...... 400.._-ING GiOUTH 111 c-- I - lIll n 1 I( -- 1JILl _ T 1, 1 ryiDERnVENvE j— 1I.._ _.. _ . , L4_— -.- IItI II IIII• i LJILI 2b68EAN - PDE A P, V E N U E t101 'NI OER ----- ' T R E E T SGA'P E L O O K I N G N 0 R T H Ir YIIIDeR 2¢ DCFd»•" FINISH NOUS Fl OL H s 1 .". 1 It.."daVNla, lyp I., CA111111, I'l I - Alt gwo Bran to IN 6, 41who. 11AROWAIM' ilmlL.- d U—n by Uad —4--1-1- cut I. NGS I 'Q01' gyplun, band It L-1 iffi%.. Pi l:.'d?11N0 FIXTUR B- 1- 1l.;AN MS rAw. y 1010' WTa To OW IEN P% r 6 1 61, r7' f t> 191721 1(711 41 X TO U- YKN 10 "WI Vora- U-07L U—n nwKy— 'q, IlJ• "Ptah IIIA Ilar J- 1 5'-ql Mll VIA In m— vFa IL FIRKW Ci-ve, N%rlrctxorSv) LLJ LLJ w Nw^ws rw crr c ' ••_ ' Ay9 delI L.1 1'. YTv rc _.1 0 5==. P i!JdPY PJ.R Nff (fi Tosl4