Verbal Communications by United Sovereign Americans•71taUiUtiUri
for a Legally Valid 2024 General Election
erects) It is a recognized civil right in the United States for every citizen to
have ree and fair elections. "And the right of suffrage can be denied by a debasement or
dilution of the weight of a citizen's vote just as effectively as by wholly prohibiting the
free exercise of the franchise." (Reynolds v. Sims, 377 U.S. 533 (1964))
`4aV Q ~e ct� It is the duty of our election officials to guarantee our elections are
accurate and free from distortion or manipulation. "Congress seeks...to guard the
election of members of Congress against any possible unfairness by compelling...
everyone concerned in holding the election to a strict and scrupulous observance of
every duty devolved upon him while so engaged... The evil intent consists in disobedi-
ence to the law" (In Re Coy, 127 U.S. 731(1888)).
�^'`�JV 4 ,erea Our constitutional system of representative government only works
when the following four tenets of an election are upheld:
1. The Voter Rolls Must Be Accurate (National Voter Registration Act, 1993).
9. Votes Counted Must Be From Eligible Voters (US Constitution, Fourteenth
Amendment, Section Two)_
3. The Number of Votes Counted Must Equal the Number of Voters Who Voted.
�.. There Can Be No More Than One in 125,000 Ballots in Error by the Voting System
(Help America Vote Act, 2002).
-1-
06172024
c e h ea,5 An open -source audit of the California 2022 General Election
cond cted by California citizens has uncovered evidence of massive inaccuracies that
appear to violate both federal and state laws, including:
• 5,885,198 ineligible or uncertain registration violations found within the California
state voter roll database.
* 2,776,939 votes cast by ineligible or uncertain registrants.
* 123,785 more votes counted than voters who voted. No one knows who cast them.
• 2,776,849 apparent voting violations in excess of the legal standard of system
accuracy for a valid federal election. Maximum allowable system errors for the 2022
general election in California was 90.
• Certification as defined by law, an attestation of accuracy and compliance, appears
to have been fraudulent and illegal.
(w C co These findings trample legal accuracy requirements of the voting
syste during a Federal Election. Accuracy is defined as the ability of the system to
capture and report the specific selections, and absence of s elections, made by a voter
without error.
Wt50eEea The intent of the voters must be known factually before certification
can be Iawfully conducted. Certification of an election that varies from the law is an
abridgement of the civil rights of the citizens, a fraud ab initio. (United States v.
Throckmorton, 98 U.S. 61 (1878)). "From time immemorial, an election to public office
has been, in point of substance, no more and no less than the expression by qualified
electors of their choice of candidates." (United States v. Classic, 313 U.S. 299 (1941))
Brea) California's 2022 General Election appears to have been invalid,
depriving us of the guaranteed protection of our Natural Rights under a government
duly and provably chosen by us, the American people, resulting in incalculable damage
to our families, our way of life, and the fabric of these United States.
----1-Nieciolution for a Legally Valid 2024 General Election
06172024
ca'
er
ore We call upon our Representatives to provide relief to the people,
a the assurance of domestic tranquility, by joining us in demanding a VALID 2024
General Election that upholds these existing laws, and equitable principles of law:
1 . Proof of citizenship, identity and eligibility to register and vote, not anonymous
attestation.
S. Voter rolls certified accurate and available for public review and challenge 30 days
before the start of early voting. Voters added after that date must bring proof of
citizenship, identity, and address in person to a qualified official at each polling place.
3. Hand -marked, secure ballots similar to currency. Where imaging technology is
used for tabulation, the security features must be verifiable in the ballot image.
4. Systems, machines, security measures, infrastructure and conduct are required to
be compliant with federal law for fraud prevention regarding risk assessment,
certification, testing, and implementation.
5. Adjudication must be signed -off by party, candidate, and trained citizen witnesses
after being given full and effective observation rights. Candidates and trained
citizens must be allowed immediate access to ballots, ballot images and CVRs.
6. Ballots, regardless of entry source, election operations, and systems must maintain
end -to -end chain of custody from voter to vote count to final canvass, including
auditability and witnessed transfer with paper records.
7. A NIST-compliant, randomized, statistically valid end -to -end audit, with a 95%
confidence level, of all elections pursuant to the 14th Amendment, Section 2 must
be performed. These audits are to be conducted by qualified, insured and bonded
security, forensics or financial auditors, not personnel from within the election
system. Reconciliation will include the vote count, real physical ballots, adjudication,
CVRs, ballot count, qualified voter count, custody transfer, and all other paper and
electronic election systems, including logs.
8. If the total of all unique variances above is more than 10% of the margin of victory,
a new election must be held in the state for those candidates affected, unless the
issues can be provably corrected by a manual hand recount and a full review of records.
9. Waiver of requirements is not allowed. Only end -to -end system compliance, from
registration through certification, can guarantee the intent of the people is accu-
rately recorded.
— cw e 3oeurion onjorrowing page —
- 3 - 1 keaotUfiOf for a Legally Valid 2024 General Election
08172024
-?je if { e�O f VQ6 That the Los Gatos City Council, Los Gatos, CA
stands in support with the concerns and remedies presented here. We implore the Santa
Clara County Board of Supervisors, California Legislature, Federal Legislators, Law
Enforcement, Federal and State Prosecutors, Judges, and both California Secretary of State
and County Registrars of Voters to cooperate and fulfill these firm requests of the people.
RESULTS OF THE VOTE YEA NAY SIGNATURE
Mayor
Mary Badame
Vice Mayor
Matthew Nudes
Councilmember
Rob Moore
Councilmember
Rob Rennie
Councilmember
Maria Ristow
a recur e6 on ftk
$f , Z0Z4.
-3-1C3ottxfiOlt for a Legally Valid 2024 General Election
46172024
q<ppeithr 1Q7e 0,:leaofufinn
Research Sources for the Open -Source Audit by California Citizens:
• Data from CA statewide voter registration database, October 9, 2023_
Relevant Laws applicable to an End -to -End Audit:
• US Constitution; Article 1, Section 4.
• H.R. 2 The National Voter Registration Act of 1993 (Pub. L. 103-31).
• H.R. 3295 The Help America Vote Act of 2002 (Pub.L.107-252).
• Federal Election Assistance Commission Voting System Standards Volume I: Performance
Standards, April, 2002.
• Federal Information Security Modernization Act of 2014 (Public Law 113-283). Originally
Federal Information Security Management Act of 2002 (Public Law 107-347 (Title Ill).
• National Institute of Standards and Technology SP 800-53: Security and Privacy Controls
for Information Systems and Organizations.
• FIPS 199 - Standards for Security Categorization of Federal Information and Information
Systems.
• U.S. Code: Title 52; Subtitle I —Voting Rights (§§ 10101 - 10702), Subtitle II —Voting
Assistance and Election Administration (§§ 20101- 21145) including:
• 52 USC § 10101(b)—Intimidation, threats, or coercion.
• 52 USC § 10307(c)--False Information in, and Payments for, Registering and Voting.
• 52 USC § 20701—Retention and preservation of records and papers by officers of
elections.
• 52 USC § 20702—Theft, destruction, concealment, mutilation, or alteration of records
or papers.
• 52 USC § 21081—Voting systems standards (HAVA).
• 52 USC § 21083—Computerized statewide voter registration list requirements and
requirements for voters who register by mail.
• 18 USC § 241—Conspiracy Against Rights.
• 18 USC § 242—Deprivation of Rights Under Color of Law.
• 18 USC § 1519—False Records in the Administration of a Federal Matter.
• 18 USC § 1028A—Aggravated Identity Theft.
• 18 USC § 514—Fictitious obligations.
cc r This work is licensed to United Sovereign Americans under the Creative Commons Attrlbution-
NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ or send a Letter to Creative Commons, PO Box 1866,
Mountain View, CA 94042, USA.
i
- 5 - �? Lef.5o LiiiO l for a Legally Valid 2024 General Election
06172024
UNITED
�_ SOVEREIGN
AMERICANS
...for Freedom!
qrsonimmianmffa
PRESS RELEASE
United Sovereign Americans Files Lawsuit
Against Georgia Election Officials
SEPTEMBER 9, 2024
Amidst trepidations that non -citizens will impact the electoral outcome of the 2024 races nationwide,
United Sovereign Americans has filed suit against Georgia's Secretary of State Brad
Raffensperger, alleging that he failed to verify the identity and eligibility of at least
543,859 facially invalid voter registrants, regardless of citizenship status, and authorized
at least 239478 potentially illegal votes from these questionable registrants in the 2022
general election to vote. Also named as a defendant is Attorney General Chris Carr, who Plaintiffs
allege has failed to enforce state laws that would have prevented this civil rights injury to all qualified
Georgia voters, and US Attorney General Merrick Garland, who has failed to enforce federal law.
Petitioners assert these officials did not provide a legally reliable or valid election in the 2022 general
election, according to the standards set by the United States Congress.
In the Help America Vote Act, Congress set a maximum error rate for a reliable federal election of i in
io,000,000 ballot positions (though Petitioners here have used the more Respondent -friendly number
of i in 500,00o to make the point even more clear). This number translates into i out of 125,000 ballots
in error permitted by law. A ballot position is a circle on a ballot. After careful analysis of Georgia
official state records regarding the 2022 midterm election, that accuracy requirement appears to have
been ignored. In a reliable election, there would have been no more than 32 errors statewide yet there
were 239,146 apparent errors. Plaintiffs also allege that according to Georgia state official's own
records, there were 34,304 fewer votes than their records show voters having voted.
Representing the plaintiffs is Bruce L. Castor, Jr. of van der Veen, Hartshorn, Levin & Lindheim.
They argue that, "While Petitioners cannot state with certainty that the 2022 Georgia General Election
produced "winning" candidates who should not have won, Petitioners believe and therefore aver that
Georgia officials cannot state with certainty that all `winning" candidates received more votes than the
"losing" candidates because the election itself was compromised by the State's failure to conform to the
requirements of federal law designed to ensure reliable election results."
Petitioners have made numerous attempts to inform state officials of this problem, yet Defendants and
their respective offices remain unwilling to examine evidence and bring the Georgia voting system into
compliance. The Mandamus action seeks a court order that the 2024 election be conducted according to
all applicable constitutional, federal, and state laws protecting the fundamental right of every American
to choose representatives in a fairly and honestly conducted election.
Unite4Freedom.com * * * info@Unite4Freedom.com
ON UNITED
SOVEREIGN
AMERICANS
...for Freedom!
States have a dual responsibility under the United States Constitution to protect against denial of the
vote, and dilution of valid votes with invalid ballots procured by corruption. In the presence of
uncertainty, the law presumes fraud and the State of Georgia must produce records proving
accuracy. Defendants have been unwilling to do so. The concern Plaintiffs raise is that the civil rights
harm sustained by every qualified Georgia voter in 2022, absent intervention by the court, will occur
again in 2024 and subsequent federal elections. When a state fails to protect voting rights, federal
apportionment can be reduced. While the State of Georgia prefers everyone to believe these are
"innocent" mistakes, the law requires investigation before certifying results.
United Sovereign Americans is also suing state officials in Maryland, Pennsylvania, Florida, North
Carolina, Michigan, Ohio, Texas and Colorado and plans to continue filing lawsuits until every state
provides their citizens with Constitutionally valid elections.
* * * Media inquiries are to be directed to:
Marly Hornik, CEO
United Sovereign Americans
167 Lamp & Lantern Village, Suite 194
Chesterfield, MO 63017
• �- f ..Tr,f",.eedom.coni
845-204-3343
Unite4Freedom.com * * * info@Unite4Freedom.com
UNITED
SOVEREIGN
AMERICANS
...for Freedom!
RESS RELEASE
United Sovereign Americans Files Lawsuit in Colorado
to Ensure a Legally Valid 2024 Election
SEPTEMBER 9, 2024
United Sovereign Americans and individual plaintiffs are represented by counsel John S. Zakhem and
Andrew C. Nickel, of the law firm Campbell, Killen, Brittan and Ray, have filed a federal lawsuit
against the State of Colorado, the Colorado Secretary of State, Jena Griswold, Phil Weiser, in his
individual capacity as Attorney General of Colorado, the Colorado Office of the Attorney General,
Merrick Garland, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the United States, and the United
States Department of Justice. United Sovereign Americans has already filed similar actions in seven
other states to date.
The Congress of the United States of America has outlined the minimum standards which must be
maintained by every state in order for a federal election to be considered reliable. According to the
Plaintiffs, Respondent election officials failed to meet those minimum standards in Colorado's 2022
federal general election rendering the certified election results in that year unreliable. If the 2022
election performance is repeated in 2024, and subsequent Colorado federal elections, Petitioners and
all Colorado voters will suffer damages.
Plaintiffs revealed 1,431,998 facially ineligible or uncertain registrations resulting in
ioo,693 improperly counted votes and 34,912 more votes counted than votes reported.
Plaintiffs assert in the lawsuit that Respondents need to perform their ministerial duties requiring
that Colorado's federal elections be conducted in conformity with the law as Congress has set forth.
Further, Petitioners have been and are currently harmed by the voting systems presently and formerly
in use in Colorado's state and federal elections. Respondents have allowed, and continue to allow,
violations of federal election laws, Colorado election laws, the United States Constitution, and federal
civil rights laws pertaining to voter rights.
Petitioners are not seeking to undermine official elections results previously certified. Rather, have
cited issues in prior Colorado federal elections to add weight to Petitioners' belief that absent
intervention by the Court, Respondents will permit the same apparent errors to occur in the 2024 and
subsequent elections in Colorado, and in all following federal elections in the State. Petitioners seek
redress from the constitutional harm brought upon them, and the Colorado electorate at large, by
Respondents' failure to comply with federal and state election law.
Unite4Freedom_com * * * info(alUnite4Freedom_com
UNITED
SOVEREIGN
AMERICANS
....for Freedom!
This Writ of Mandamus is appropriate and necessary to justify the rights of citizens when a
governmental agency or official has refused to perform a ministerial duty that the Petitioners has
established, has a dear legal right, to have the governmental agency or officials, in this case
Respondents, perform in order to ensure mandating accurate registration rolls, transparency,
compliance, and proper certification of the voting systems and elections.
* * * Media inquiries are to be directed to:
Marly Hornik, CEO
United Sovereign Americans
167 Lamp & Lantern Village, Suite 194
Chesterfield, MO 63017
info (u7 Unite4 Freedom. com
845-204-3343
Unite4Freedom.com * * * info@Unite4Freedom.com
-0 UNITED
SOVEREIGN
Now -.AMERICANS
...for Freedom!
PRESS RELEASE
United Sovereign Americans Files Lawsuit Against Michigan Election Officials
SEPTEMBER 2, 2024
Amidst fears that noncitizens will impact the electoral outcome of 2024 races nationwide, United
Sovereign Americans has filed suit against Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson, alleging
that she failed to verify the authenticity of at least 57,978,855 facially invalid voter data records,
regardless of citizenship status, and authorized at least 369,107 potentially illegal votes from
questionable registrants in the 2022 general election. Also named as defendant is Attorney General
Dana Nessel, who Plaintiffs allege has failed to enforce state laws that would have prevented this
civil rights injury to all qualified Michigan voters, and US Attorney General Merrick Garland, who
has failed to enforce federal law. Petitioners assert these officials did not provide a legally reliable
election in the 2022 general election, according to the standards set by the United States Congress.
In the Help America Vote Act, Congress set a maximum error rate for a reliable federal election of
1 in 10,000,00o ballot positions (though Petitioners here have used the more Respondent -friendly
number of 1 in 500,00o to make the point even more clear). This number translates into 1 out of
125,00o ballots in error permitted by law. A ballot position is a circle on a ballot. After careful
analysis of Michigan official state records regarding the 2022 midterm, that accuracy requirement
appears to have been ignored. Plaintiffs allege that Michigan state officials counted 17,973 more
votes than their raw data records show voters having voted. Meanwhile Michigan state officials
counted 3,168 more votes than the county Poll Book records show voters having voted. In addition,
Michigan state officials counted 14,058 more votes than their "Official" list of voters records show
having voted. In a reliable election, there would have been no more than 36 errors statewide.
Joining United Sovereign Americans are Michigan Fair Elections Institute, Timothy Mauro -Vetter,
Braden Giacobazzi, Phani Mantravadi, Philip O'Hallorin, Donna Brandenburg, and Nick Somberg.
Representing the plaintiffs is Bruce L. Castor, Jr. of van der Veen, Hartshorn, Levin & Lindheim.
They argue that, "While Petitioners cannot state with certainty that the 2022 Michigan General
Election produced "winning" candidates who should not have won, Petitioners believe and
therefore aver that Michigan officials cannot state with certainty that all "winning" candidates
received more votes than the "losing" candidates because the election itself was compromised by
the State's failure to conform to the requirements of federal law designed to ensure reliable election
results."
Petitioners have made numerous attempts to inform state officials of this problem, yet Defendants
and their respective offices remain unwilling to examine evidence and bring the Michigan voting
system into compliance. The Mandamus action seeks a court order that the 2024 election be
conducted according to all applicable constitutional, federal, and state laws protecting the
fundamental right of every American to choose representatives in a fairly and honestly conducted
election.
Unite4Freedom.eom * * * info@Unite4Freedom.com
UNITED
SOVEREIGN
AMERICANS
...for Freedom!
4
States have a dual responsibility under the United States Constitution to protect against denial of the
vote, and dilution of valid votes with invalid ballots procured by corruption. In the presence of
uncertainty, the law presumes fraud and the State of Michigan must produce records proving
accuracy. Defendants have been unwilling to do so. The concern Plaintiffs raise is that the civil rights
harm sustained by every qualified Michigan voter in 2022, absent intervention by the court, will
occur again in 2024 and subsequent federal elections. When a state fails to protect voting rights,
federal apportionment can be reduced. While the State of Michigan prefers everyone to believe these
are "innocent" mistakes, the law requires investigation before certifying results.
United Sovereign Americans is also suing state officials in Maryland, Pennsylvania, Florida, North
Carolina, Texas, and Ohio, and plans to continuing filing lawsuits until every state provides their
citizens with Constitutionally valid elections.
Media inquiries are to be directed to:
Marly Hornik, CEO
United Sovereign Americans
167 Lamp & Lantern Village, Suite 194
Chesterfield, MO 63017
info@Unite4Freedom.com
845-204-3343
Unite4Freedom.com * * * info@Unite4Freedom.com