Loading...
19 Addendum.ACFR Preparation Services PREPARED BY: Gitta Ungvari Finance Director Reviewed by: Town Attorney, and Assistant Town Manager 110 E. Main Street Los Gatos, CA 95030 ● 406-354-6832 www.losgatosca.gov TOWN OF LOS GATOS COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT MEETING DATE: 08/20/2024 ITEM NO: 19 ADDENDUM DATE: August 19, 2024 TO: Mayor and Town Council FROM: Laurel Prevetti, Town Manager SUBJECT: Authorize The Town Manager to Reissue a Request for Proposal (RFP) for the Preparation of the Annual Comprehensive Financial Report (ACFR) with a Modification to Start the ACFR Preparation Services for the FY 2024/25 ACFR REMARKS: Attachment 1 contains public comment received after 11:00 a.m. Friday, August 16, 2024, and before 11:00 on Monday, August 19, 2024. Attachment Received with this Addendum: 1. Public Comment Received After 11:00 a.m. Friday August 16, 2024, and Before 11:00 on Monday, August 19, 2024. <GWhelan@losgatosca.gov>; 'Wendy Wood' <WWood@losgatosca.gov> Subject: Agenda Item #1 - Finance Commission - Auditor Independence concerns Dear Ms. Prevetti, We have read your report for agenda item #1 which is attached. We are encouraged the Town Council agrees with the Finance Commission’s recommendation to address the Commission’s concern regarding the long-standing AICPA professional requirement that auditors who provide services to entities (regardless of the entity being a company or a state or local government) for which independence is required, be independent both in fact (that is, of mind) and in appearance. In addition to the AICPA requirement, the Government Accountability Office sets independence rules that apply to entities audited under Government Auditing Standards (referred to as GAGAS). The Government Auditing Standards apply to the Town of Los Gatos and the auditor must also comply with these independence rules. We have attached the relevant GAGAS rules for your review. For sake of clarity, the AICPA rules also require a member to comply with more restrictive independence provisions if applicable, such as the Government Accountability Office. In listening to the Town Council discussion of this topic and reading the attached staff memo, we believe more disclosure is required so both the Town Council and the public fully understand and appreciate the “self- audit” concerns we have raised. With this in mind, we respectfully offer the following comments and observations: The threat to independence as outlined in GAGAS section 3.88 is triggered by the auditor preparing the basic financial statements and footnotes from a client provided trial balance. Creating a threat of independence increases audit risk which must be addressed. Please refer to the attached flow chart of independence considerations for preparing accounting records and financial statements prepared by the Government Accountability Office. While it may be common practice for municipalities to have basic financial statements prepared by their “independent” auditor (the Finance Commission is not able to agree or disagree with this assertion), this is not a “best practice” and is not recommended by GFOA or the Government Accountability Office. This might be convenient or expedient but so doing creates a “significant” threat to independence which requires mitigation. As a result of preparing the basic financial services (called non- attest service), the auditor must meet several requirements which are safeguards to clear the presumptive hurdle of impairment of independence. The auditor must document actions taken to mitigate this impairment to an acceptable level. This adds additional cost, time, and risk to the audit process. Auditing a trial balance does not provide sufficient assurance the basic financial statements are free from material misstatements and certainly does not “allow” the auditor to issue an opinion on the Town’s basic financial statements. The auditor is expressing an opinion on the basic financial statements taken as a whole, not an opinion on an “audited” trial balance. Please refer to Chavan and Associates engagement letter dated March 9, 2022. The Town should prepare the basic financial statements and footnotes on their own to avoid tripping section 3.88. If the Town is unwilling or incapable of preparing the basic financial statements and footnotes, then a separate firm should be retained to prepare the financial statements and footnotes. This would avoid the “self-audit” independence concern arising from performing a non-attest service when also performing an attest engagement. The auditor is currently performing the non-attest work (approximately 16% of engagement work) and with proper scheduling a third party or the Town staff should be able to take on this work without elongating the audit schedule or materially increasing the cost of the audit. To be clear, the Town currently issues its ACFR 6 months after the close of the fiscal year. We look forward to discussing with Staff the best way to achieve the objective of reducing the independence concerns arising from the non- attest services currently performed by the auditor as outlined in his engagement letter. Sincerely, Phil Koen Linda Reiners Chair of the Finance Commission Vice Chair of the Finance Commission