09 Desk Item.Item # 9 - CIP 2024
PREPARED BY: Nicolle Burnham
Director of Parks and Public Works
110 E. Main Street Los Gatos, CA 95030 ● (408) 354-6832
www.losgatosca.gov
TOWN OF LOS GATOS
COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
MEETING DATE: 02/06/2024 ITEM NO: 9 DESK ITEM
DATE: February 6, 2024
TO: Mayor and Town Council
FROM: Laurel Prevetti, Town Manager
SUBJECT: Receive a Status Report on Capital Improvement Projects and Provide
Direction for the Fiscal Year 2024/25 – 2028/29 Priorities
REMARKS:
In response to Council Members’ questions, staff has provided the following responses in italics
to the summarized questions:
1. What was the total amount of capital available to fund all the CIP projects listed at the
end of FY 23? Is the total amount of $44,505,101 (bottom of “current funding of CIP”
schedule) fully funded?
The 23/24 budget information shown in Attachment 1 shows a total of $44,505,101 allocated to
the 2023/24 CIP. This includes various sources of funding including GFAR, grants, permit fee
revenue, gas tax and various other sources. Some of these, like GFAR, are fully funded.
Others, such as grant revenue, represent funding promised through grant agreements but for
which the Town must seek reimbursement. One example of this is Project 4505 – Los Gatos
Creek Trail to Highway 9 Trailhead Connector Project. Attachment 1 shows the 2023/24 budget
for this project to be $8,829,851. Of this amount, $7,711,306 is from grant sources that will be
reimbursed to the Town.
Other capital sources such as Measure G, gas tax revenues, storm drain funds, permit fee
revenue, etc. are included in the $44,505,101 based on both existing available funding and
projected revenues to be received during the fiscal year.
PAGE 2 OF 3 SUBJECT: Receive a Status Report on Capital Improvement Projects and Provide Direction for the Fiscal Year 2024/25 – 2028/29 Priorities DATE: February 6, 2024
REMARKS (continued):
2. The total CIP adopted for FY 24 was $37,771,822. The current CIP schedule now shows
$44.5M as the FY 23/24 budget. What is driving the $6.7M increase and where did the
funding come for this increase?
The $37,771,822 included an estimated $27,646,692 in carryforward funds in addition to
$10,125,131 in new funding as reported the adopted CIP (See Page A-7). The carryforward
funds presented in the adopted CIP represent the projected carryforward amount as of March
2023. The actual carryforward amount at the close of the budget year was higher than
originally projected, which represents the $6.7M increase. In other words, capital funding was
not spent as quickly between March and fiscal year end as staff predicted. This is the result of a
vacancy in the CIP engineering team.
3. Why does Table 3 of the staff report include Hwy 17/9 interchange of $8.6M and Highway
17 bicycle bridge of $6.3M of “estimated additional funding required” if these amounts
were included in the TIF that was just approved? My understanding is that the costs are
now funded by the TIF.
Both of these projects were included in the Transportation Impact Fee (TIF) at the “Estimated
Additional Funding Required” levels presented in Table 3. The values presented in the TIF
represent the Town’s share of design and construction costs as of 2022. Staff recognizes that
the actual cost of construction may vary based on future design decisions (e.g., CalTrans criteria,
environmental review, value engineering, etc.) and inflationary pressure. For this reason, the
costs are presented here as “Estimated Additional Funding Required” at the same levels shown
in the TIF. The values in the adopted TIF and shown in Table 3 are the same and are based on
the best available information regarding these project costs.
Also, please note that there are various potential sources of funding to meet the “Estimated
Additional Funding Required” in Table 3, including future TIF revenues. With this current item,
staff is asking for Town Council feedback on project priorities. Once the priorities are known,
staff will identify appropriate funding strategies and sources to deliver the projects.
Attachment 6 contains public comments received between 11:01 a.m. Monday, February 5,
2024, and 11:01 a.m. Tuesday, February 6, 2024.
Attachment 7 contains the staff slide presentation that will be given at this evening’s meeting.
Attachment 8 contains the revised Attachment 1.
PAGE 3 OF 3 SUBJECT: Receive a Status Report on Capital Improvement Projects and Provide Direction for the Fiscal Year 2024/25 – 2028/29 Priorities DATE: February 6, 2024
COORDINATION:
The preparation of this Desk Item was coordinated with the Finance Department and the Town
Manager’s Office.
Attachments received with the Staff Report:
1. Current Funding of CIP FY 2023/24 – 2027/28
2. Status of Currently Funded One-Time Capital Projects
3. Staff Memorandum to Parks Commission dated September 28, 2023
4. Public Comment Received Prior to 11:00 AM on February 1, 2024
Attachment received with the previous Addendum:
5. Public comments received between 11:01 a.m. Thursday, February 1, 2024, and 11:00 a.m.
Monday, February 5, 2024.
Attachments received with Desk Item:
6. Public comments received between 11:01 a.m. Monday, February 5, 2024, and 11:01 a.m.
Tuesday, February 6, 2024.
7. PowerPoint presentation
8. Revised Attachment 1 - Current Funding of CIP FY 2023/24 – 2027/28
From:Leanne McAuliffe
To:Clerk
Subject:Public Comment Item #9 - Council Meeting 02/06/2024, 7:00pm
Date:Tuesday, February 6, 2024 8:05:52 AM
[EXTERNAL SENDER]
Council Members, thank you for allowing this public comment.
Re: Replacement of Artificial Turf (AT)at Creekside Park.
Why would our town spend $1 Million on another artificial turf that will almost definitely not
meet future regulations? Aside from the fact that this plastic carpet sheds micro and nano
plastics into the environment over its entire lifetime, every artificial turf sample tested by The
Ecology Center and Dr Graham Peaslee of Notre Dame University has tested positive for PFAS.
PFAS are the 14,000 or so "forever chemicals" we are constantly hearing about which are
being linked to cancers, infertility, reduced immunity, among others.
Three PFAS are already on the Prop 65 list. (and have been found in AT.)
The EPA is considering classifying 9 as hazardous (eight of which have been found in AT).
Governor Newsom recently vetoed a bill that would regulate PFAS in artificial turf. He did so
not because he didn't agree with it but because AB1423 was devoid of any regulatory
oversight. So he has passed the issue to the Department of TOXIC Substances Control who are
studying artificial turf with a view to regulating it.
The reason for these regulations is to prevent pollution of the air we breath, the soil that
supports biodiversity and the water we drink. This is the environment our developing children
are dependent on. Developing children are most susceptible to the negative effects of any
toxic exposures, via inhalation, ingestion and dermal absorption.
Please pause on artificial turf and sincerely investigate replacing the field with natural grass for
the health of our community (especially our children) and the environment. New hybrid
grasses are drought tolerant and more resistant to wear which were the old arguments
against natural turf.
If anyone tells you artificial turf fields don’t shed, ask for the warranty. Many state 50% blade
height loss over 8 years is reasonable and not covered. So 50% of the petrochemical derived,
PFAS laced blades are “lost” into the environment (and our kids) and that’s acceptable
according to the artificial turf industry.
If anyone tells you a product is PFAS free, ask for the data. Ask for 3rd part independent testing
by leading experts. Industry generally only tests for 70 or so PFAS and often only to parts per
million which is not sufficient enough to claim "PFAS free".
ATTACHMENT 6
To put that into perspective, the EPA advisory for drinking water equates to 0.000000004
ppm. (= 0.004 parts per trillion).
The artificial turf industry requested 100ppm limits for AT. This equates to 100,000,000 ppt.
PFAS and microplastics are not the only issue with artificial turf. There are many reasons that
make artificial turf a bad choice which I'm happy to provide information on. Please consider
natural turf.
Leanne McAuliffe
Resident of Los Gatos and parent of four.
Side note: There is also reference to a community group contributing up to $200K for the new
carpet. Please make it clear to the whole community what conditions are attached to this
contribution. Would Creekside still be a community field or only for that community sub-
group? It is essential the field be fairly available to the whole community and not just a sub-
group. If you allow the sub-group to choose the new surface and monopolize use then might
the ratio of contributions be the wrong way around?
Dear Council Members,
My concern is artificial turf and its negative impact on the environment and our children.(See the letter
from the Santa Clara County Medical Association to Saratoga High School.)Because the artificial turf
industry is unregulated,we request a moratorium on artificial turf for all Los Gatos town-managed
property or,at the very least,all of the following actions:
●strict regulations that require PFAS free products (proven by 3rd party testing)
●100%plant sourced infills
●GMAX (field hardness)testing every six months (because of the heavy field use)
●defined policies regarding field closures in response to unsafe field hardness (GMAX)
●defined policies regarding field closures in response to elevated risk of heat related illness
I understand that a primary concern for the town is cost.Beware of 20 year cost comparisons as these are
often skewed in favor of artificial turf with misleading information as was the case when artificial turf was
being considered by LGUSD (eg.omitting a full artificial turf replacement due at year 20).Also,consider
the externalized costs (Story of Stuff).There are potentially irreparable environmental and human health
costs,each of which could lead to exorbitant mitigation*and litigation costs especially with regard to PFAS
and microplastics contamination of local water supplies for example.(All artificial turf carpet samples
independently tested to date contained PFAS.)Note,any artificial turf being considered now will
almost certainly exceed the PFAS limits of any future Bills.
Creekside sports field is a prime example of how artificial turf is typically not maintained adequately.It’s
also a prime example of how owners typically haven’t planned and budgeted to replace it in advance of it
reaching irreparable field hardness.In 2022 this sports field exceeded recommended impact safety levels.
Was this remediated?These fields also continue to disintegrate throughout their lifetime,polluting the
environment (Los Gatos Creek)and putting the health and safety of children at risk.Even maintenance
doesn’t solve the migration of field debris beyond the sportsfield into the greater environment.Since the
field is up for renewal in the next year or so,we strongly recommend investigating a return to
natural turf for the field,because natural turf fields are possible.
For ornamental purposes,be they town or residential,artificial turf also has negative environmental and
human health costs and for that reason Valley Water does not give rebates for it as a solution to drought
tolerant landscaping.For these ornamental spaces,and even dog parks,there are many healthier,safer
and natural drought tolerant options.
Given that artificial turf is made with PFAS laden petrochemical plastic which then disintegrates into micro-
and nano-plastics over its entire lifetime,the environmental,human health and financial costs will last for
generations.The best way to avoid future potential mitigation*and litigation costs associated with artificial
turf is to simply NOT install it in the first place.On this basis I urge the council to consider a
moratorium on artificial turf or,at the very least,stringently regulate it as defined above.The
United States Environmental Protection Agency’s PFAS Strategic Roadmap 2021-2024 requires local
governments to prevent new PFAS contamination.Here is an opportunity for the Los Gatos Town
Council to do just that.
The following page lists just a few cost concerns with artificial turf sports fields,many of which also apply
to town and residential artificial turf installations in general.Please don’t hesitate to reach out to us for
any questions,further information or discussion on this important matter.Thank you for your time!!
Kind regards,
Leanne McAuliffe,Concerned Resident of Los Gatos and Mom of Four.
FINANCIAL COSTS
●Installation -Artificial turf sports fields (AT)cost millions at first installation.
●Maintenance -If maintained correctly,the maintenance cost of AT would be similar to natural turf with a
lawn mower simply being traded for multiple maintenance and grooming machines (FieldTurf
maintenance manual).AT not maintained correctly opens up injury liabilities and voids warranty.
●Replacements -Carpet and infill replacement costs after 8 to10 years are often higher than initial
installation and can leave buyers surprised and without enough funds to replace worn out,unsafe fields.
Replacements with shockpad at around the 20 year mark are even more expensive.
●Converting back -If it all goes wrong (PFAS deception),converting AT back to natural grass is said to
be costly if soil replacement is required.This can make buyers feel locked into AT.
●Mitigation*and Litigation -AT environmental pollution and human health effects (heat related injuries,
concussions,CTE,death,PFAS exposure,cancers etc.)may lead to mitigation and litigation costs.
HUMAN HEALTH COSTS (especially to our kids who are uniquely vulnerable)
●PFAS,Toxins,Microplastics -AT potentially exposes our children to toxins (PFAS,microplastics,
phthalates,heavy metals,methane,ethylene,etc.)through dermal contact,inhalation and ingestion,
jeopardizing their short and long term health and safety.Chemical exposures have been listed as a
potential cause of the 62%decline in sperm count and 50%increase in cancer rates in children.
●Heat -AT can have a “heat island”effect leading to heat exhaustion,heatstroke (potentially fatal)and
thermal burns.Many argue that excessive rain is an issue with natural turf.Excessive heat is the same
for AT which can easily reach 40-70°hotter than local air temp with cork infill.In our town,heat is far
more of an issue than rain,and properly managed natural turf fields can and do easily handle rain.
●Injuries -AT is associated with a higher rate of injuries,concussions,friction burns etc.
●Unregulated -AT is unregulated at this time meaning no government organization currently
categorically deems AT safe for children to play on.
ENVIRONMENTAL COSTS
●Pollution -AT pollutes the soil,water and air with PFAS,other chemicals,gasses and microplastics at
site of manufacture,use and disposal.As AT disintegrates due to age,use,maintenance,UV and heat
exposure,the level of pollution potentially increases.
●End of Life Disposal -AT is NOT recycled.(“Chemical recycling”is incineration.)A small amount is
repurposed but the vast majority ends up in landfills and some is even illegally disposed of.
●Biodiversity/Soil/Trees -AT destroys soil health and biodiversity and can lead to the demise of
surrounding shallow,wide rooting trees like redwoods.
●Pesticides -AT requires pesticides and herbicides as well as fungicides,biocides,anti-statics,cleaning
agents.Some AT component products even include antibacterials as ingredients.Every AT “feature”
equals more chemicals.And AT itself is chemicals.Compare this to organically managed grass.
●Water -AT advocates argue it uses less water which is crucial in times of drought.However,to provide a
cool,safe,playable surface,irrigation amounts for AT are greater than for natural warm-season turf.
Water is also required to clean AT and for maintenance purposes to meet warranty conditions.New
drought tolerant grasses use dramatically less water and continue to improve with research and
development.
If realistic water and maintenance costs between properly maintained artificial turf and natural turf
sports fields are similar,why would we give up ALL the benefits of natural turf for ALL the negative
and potential costs of artificial turf?
*You can only mitigate PFAS,you can not remediate.There is NO 100%solution to PFAS pollution,
because there are no viable remediation methods at present.PFAS are called “forever chemicals”
for a reason.They are mostly Persistent,Bioaccumulative Toxins (PBTs).This means they are
essentially impossible to completely remove from soil,water,air and human bodies.Combine this
with emerging data on the negative health and environment effects of PFAS,and the fact that
thousands of PFAS have yet to even be studied,and it becomes clear that it’s IMPERATIVE to
STOP using PFAS wherever possible to prevent further and new contamination.
Capital Improvement Program Status
and Priorities
Town Council Meeting
February 6, 2024
1
ATTACHMENT 7
CURRENT PROJECTS PRIOR SPENDING
SUMMARY (from Attachment 1)
2
FY 2018/19 - 2022/23
Spending
FY 2023/24 Actual
Spending Year to Date
Total Streets Projects $ 25,637,810 $ 3,789,506
Total Parks Projects $ 1,076,436 $ 214,253
Total Facilities Projects $ 3,628,845 $ 526,640
Total Capital Improvement Allocations
FY23/24 through 27/28 $ 30,343,091 $ 4,530,398
ONGOING ANNUAL PROJECT PRIORITIES (from Memo Table 2)
3
Project Name Project No.Funding Program Project
Purpose1
Street Repair & Resurfacing
811-9901 /
811-9903 Streets 1,2,3,5
Unanticipated Repairs - Annual 811-9904 Streets 1,4
Roadside Fire Fuel Reduction 812-0130 Streets 1,5
Measure B Education & Encouragement 812-0134 Streets 1,2,3
Curb, Gutter, Sidewalk Maintenance 813-9921 Streets 1,3,4
Retaining Wall + Guardrails Repairs 815-9930 Streets 1,2,3,5
Annual Storm Drain Improvement Project 816-0420 Streets 1,3,4,5
Town Beautification 821-2002 Public Facilities 3,5
Annual ADA Compliance Work 821-2013 Public Facilities 1,3,4,5
Parks Playground Fibar Project (Bi-Annual)831-4605 Parks and Trails 1,3,4
Vegetation Management Town-wide 832-4508 Parks and Trails 1,5
ADD / RESTORE: Annual Restriping NEW Streets 1,2,3,5
Notes: 1. Project Purposes are: (1) Safety, (2) Traffic/Transportation, (3) Quality of Life, (4) Regulatory or Legal
Mandate, (5) Effective Management of Existing Assets and (6) Improvement
STAFF RECOMMENDED ONE-TIME PROJECT PRIORITIES
(from Memo Table 3)
4
Notes: 1. Project Purposes are: (1) Safety, (2) Traffic/Transportation, (3) Quality of Life, (4) Regulatory or Legal Mandate,
(5) Effective Management of Existing Assets and (6) Improvement
2. Preliminary opinion of needs over the life of the project. Funding for projects may be spread over multiple years.
Project Name Project No.Funding Program Project
Purpose1
Past Funding
(From
Attachment 1)
Estimated Additional
Funding Required2
Shannon Road Repair 811-0008 Streets 1,2,3,5,6 $4,517,943 $130,000
Hwy 17/9 Interchange and
Capacity Improvements
813-0237 Streets 1,2,3,6 $3,867,000 $8,600,000
Highway 17 Bicycle &
Pedestrian Bridge - Design
818-0803 Streets 1,2,3,6 $3,786,885 $6,322,156
Civic Center Plumbing
Repair
821-2120 Public Facilities 5 $40,000 $120,000
Town Plaza Turf Repair 831-4202 Parks and Trails 3,5,6 $42,000 $40,000
Creekside Park Turf
Replacement
831-4404 Parks and Trails 1, 5 $500,000 $500,000
STAFF RECOMMENDED NEW PROJECTS
5
Parks and Public Works Yard Generator and Transfer Switch Replacement
Fleet Bay Improvements
OTHER PROJECTS FOR CONSIDERATION
6
•Tennis / Pickleball Courts at LaRinconada and Blossom Hill Parks: Parks
and Sustainabilty Commission recommendation
•Recoating AirForce Plane at Oak Meadow Park: Required per contract
with Air Force
•Blossom Hill Road Safety Improvements: Grant match required
•Townwide Parks Master Plan: Staff recommendation to address
population needs
OTHER PROJECTS FOR CONSIDERATION
7
•Townwide Parks Master Plan: Staff recommendation to address
population needs
•Overlook Road Streetscape: To address impacts from removal of
eucalyptus trees
•Downtown Streetscape Enhancement: Redesign and reconstruct Santa
Cruz from Blossom Hill Road to Broadway
•Montebello Way Event Closure: Install bollards to facilitate events
TODAY’S DISCUSSION
8
•Status of existing capital projects (Memo Attachment 1)
•Funding for ongoing annually funded projects (Memo Table 2)
•Funding priorities for existing projects (Memo Table 3)
•Funding consideration for critical upgrades at Parks and Public Works Yard
•Direct staff on how to prioritize potential new projects
Current Funding of CIPFY 2023/24 ‐2027/28STREETS PROGRAM SUMMARYProject NumberProject NameFY 2018/19 ‐ 2022/23 SpendingFY 2023/24 Actuals Through1/25/24 FY 2023/24 Adjusted Budget as of 12/31/2023FY 2024/25 BudgetFY 2025/26 BudgetFY 2026/27 BudgetFY 2027/28 Budget Total BudgetedReconstruction9901 Street Repair & Resurfacing12,128,469.07 2,670,467.89 7,755,984 3,243,947 3,243,947 3,243,947 3,243,947 32,860,240 9903 Pavement Rehab‐Crack Seal1,109,499.42 180,000.00 360,000 180,000 180,000 180,000 180,000 2,189,499 Maintenance‐Safety9904 Unanticipated Repairs ‐ Annual‐ ‐ 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 500,000 9930 Retaining Wall Repairs226,540.74 1,073.58 566,799 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 993,340 0008 Shannon Road Repair*433,152.13 140,577.48 4,442,912 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 4,876,064 0009 North 40 Traffic Mit‐ 47,976.98 ‐ ‐ 0129 ADA Transition Plan162,100.00 8,050.00 22,900 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 185,000 0130 Roadside Fire Fuel Reduction8999,809.00 340.00 1,572,191 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 2,972,000 0131 East Main Street Speed Table/Raised Crosswalk*43,700.00 ‐ 271,300 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 315,000 0132 Local Road Safety Program103,306.93 12,081.78 25,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 128,307 0133 VMT Mitigation Program134,767.04 9,354.33 115,233 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 250,000 0134 Measure B Education & Encouragement18,670.91 ‐ 119,674 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 138,345 0135 Town‐wide Speed Studies‐ ‐ 80,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 80,000 Street Improvements9921 Curb, Gutter & Sidewalk Maintenance2,596,962.39 89,535.00 445,832 300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 4,242,794 0218 Shannon Road Pedestrian and Bikeway Improvements*263,303.56 78,979.16 2,043,823 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 2,307,127 0225 Utility Undergrounding Improvements2,851.67 ‐ 299,573 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 302,425 0227 Traffic Signal Modernization1,986,927.96 38,443.75 635,333 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 2,622,261 0235 Downtown Streetscape Revitalization/Economic Recovery Efforts1,929,139.50 239,867.38 912,500 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 2,841,640 0237 Highway 17/9 Interchange and Capacity Improvements600,000.00 ‐ 867,000 ‐ 800,000 800,000 800,000 3,867,000 0238 Winchester Boulevard Complete Streets Final Design141,323.72 ‐ 1,734,250 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 1,875,574 0240 Winchester Class IV Bikeway942,061.55 ‐ 693,560 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 1,635,622 0241 Kennedy Sidewalk ‐ LGB To Englewood‐ ‐ 631,126 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 631,126 0242 Parking Program Implementation153,110.08 17,294.00 445,390 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 598,500 0243 Storm Related Repairs5,250.00 18,065.00 39,050 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 44,300 0414 Stormwater System ‐ Pollution Prevention Compliance22,722.11 38,746.68 265,278 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 288,000 0420 Annual Storm Drain Improvement Project291,180.75 ‐ 252,219 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 543,400 0421 Loma Street Drainage‐ ‐ 100,000 250,000 496,300 ‐ ‐ 846,300 0422 Harwood/Belridge Drainage Study‐ ‐ 100,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 100,000 0423 709 University Avenue Drainage System Replacement‐ ‐ 200,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 200,000 0424 333 University Avenue Inlet Capacity Improvements‐ ‐ 50,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 50,000 0705 Downtown Parking Lots Seal Coat & Restriping59,924.00 ‐ 15,161 10,000 ‐ 10,000 ‐ 95,085 0708 Parking Lot 4 Repair & Waterproofing199,800.00 ‐ 50,200 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 250,000 Bridges0801 Quito Road ‐ Bridge Replacement‐ ‐ 285,087 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 285,087 0803 Highway 17 Bicycle & Pedestrian Bridge ‐ Design1,083,237.92 198,652.56 3,374,064 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 4,457,302 0804 Timber Bridge Inspection‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 25,000 25,000 ‐ 50,000 Total Streets Projects25,637,810$ 3,789,506$ 28,871,439$ 4,233,947$ 5,295,247$ 4,808,947$ 4,773,947$ 73,621,337$ * Includes ARPA Replacement Revenue Funding1 of 2ATTACHMENT 1 REVISED 2/6/24ATTACHMENT 8
Current Funding of CIPFY 2023/24 ‐2027/28PARK & TRAILS PROGRAM SUMMARYPrior Years Spending 2023/24 Actuals 2023/24 Budget2024/25 Budget2025/26 Budget2026/27 Budget2027/28 Budget Total BudgetedParks4007 Oak Meadow Bandstand Area Improvements22,282.42 ‐ 264,448 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 286,730 4202 Town Plaza Turf Repairs1,000.00 ‐ 27,000 15,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ 43,000 4404 Creekside Park Turf Replacement*‐ ‐ 500,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 500,000 4605 Parks Playground Fibar Project29,071.20 ‐ 56,969 25,000 ‐ 25,000 ‐ 136,040 4610 Pinehurst Community Garden*14,314.20 22,524.24 270,686 100,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ 385,000 Trails4503 Charter Oaks Trail Repair72,941.84 ‐ 474,891 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 547,833 4504 Open Space Trail Upgrades‐ ‐ 152,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 152,000 4505 Los Gatos Creek Trail to Highway 9 Trailhead Connector Project691,999.96 170,319.51 8,829,851 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 9,521,851 4508 Vegetation Management ‐ Town Wide244,826.23 5,391.75 102,881 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 747,707 4510Lynn Ave Pedestrian Path Design*‐ 16,017.02 190,000 100,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ 290,000 Total Parks Projects1,076,436$ 214,253$ 10,868,726$ 340,000$ 100,000$ 125,000$ 100,000$ 12,610,161$ PUBLIC FACILITIES PROGRAM SUMMARYPrior Years Spending 2023/24 Actuals 2023/24 Budget2024/25 Budget2025/26 Budget2026/27 Budget2027/28 Budget Total BudgetedInfrastructure2002 Town Beautification44,796.51 9,957.85 25,203 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 130,000 2009 Public Art Gateway Project*50,000.00 20,500.00 81,500 37,500 37,500 ‐ ‐ 206,500 2011 Downtown Restroom Feasibility Study*‐ 23,000.00 25,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 25,000 2012 Emergency Preparedness*‐ ‐ 96,780 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 96,780 2013 Annual ADA Compliance Work‐ ‐ 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 50,000 2117 ADA Restrooms And HR Offices74,924.00 69,203.00 905,076 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 980,000 2120 Civic Center Plumbing Repair*‐ ‐ 40,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 40,000 2206 Adult Rec Ctr Floor Repr155,169.60 877.25 ‐ 155,170 2207 Adult Recreation Center HVAC195,404.34 ‐ 114,596 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 310,000 2208 ARC ‐ Interim Community Center‐ ‐ 866,281 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 866,281 2302Building Replacement at Corporation Yard2,139,969.12 133,386.09 507,033 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 2,647,002 2309 Termite Abatement at Water Tower*‐ 2,100.00 24,500 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 24,500 2310 Engineering Counter Modifications*‐ ‐ 40,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 40,000 2403 HVAC Improvement ‐ POB Building8‐ ‐ 25,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 25,000 2404 POB Space Study‐ ‐ 75,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 75,000 2504 Library Improvements‐ ‐ 22,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 22,000 2505 Battery Power Supply ‐ Library439,466.20 100,716.20 103,534 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 543,000 2601 ADA Upgrade Public Restrooms ‐ Adult Recreation Building52,081.26 ‐ 599,898 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 651,979 Equipment6003 Town‐Wide Document Imaging Project‐ ‐ 16,990 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 16,990 6101 Enterprise Resource Planning Upgrade281,154.17 166,899.90 1,132,425 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 1,413,579 6103 EOC Communications Upgrade24,716.93 ‐ 25,283 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 50,000 6104It Disaster Recovery Improvements171,162.88 ‐ 28,837 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 200,000 Total Facilities Projects3,628,845$ 526,640$ 4,764,935 62,500 62,500 25,000 25,000 8,568,780 Total Capital Improvement Allocations FY23/24 through 27/2830,343,091$ 4,530,398$ 44,505,101$ 4,636,447$ 5,457,747$ 4,958,947$ 4,898,947$ 94,800,279$ * Includes ARPA Replacement Revenue Funding2 of 2