Item 2 - Staff Report and Attachments 1 to 8
PREPARED BY: SEAN MULLIN, AICP
Senior Planner
Reviewed by: Planning Manager and Community Development Director
110 E. Main Street Los Gatos, CA 95030 ● 408-354-6832
www.losgatosca.gov
TOWN OF LOS GATOS
CONCEPTUAL DEVELOPMENT
ADVISORY COMMITTEE REPORT
MEETING DATE: 05/11/2022 ITEM NO: 2
DATE: May 6, 2022
TO: Conceptual Development Advisory Committee
FROM: Joel Paulson, Community Development Director
SUBJECT: Conceptual Development Advisory Committee Application CD-22-003. Project
Location: 300 Mountain Laurel Lane. APN: 567-24-023. Property Owner: Bright
Smile Dental Office Defined Benefit Plan. Applicant: Kunling Wu, Trustee.
Requesting Preliminary Review of a Proposal to Amend the Planned
Development Ordinance to Increase the Maximum Residence Size Allowed on
Lot 14 on Property Zoned HR-5:PD.
ROLE OF THE CONCEPTUAL DEVELOPMENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE:
The Conceptual Development Advisory Committee (Committee) advises a prospective applicant
on the overall consistency of a project with Town policies prior to submitting a formal
application and investing in the development review process. The Committee also endeavors
to identify the potential issues that will need to be addressed during the development review
process should the applicant wish to submit an application. The issues identified by the
Committee are not intended to be all-inclusive and other additional issues may be identified
during the formal development review process.
None of the Committee's comments are binding on the Town and in no way are they intended
to indicate whether the project will be received favorably by the various review bodies that are
charged with evaluating and deciding the application. As noted in this report, if an application
is filed, technical analysis would need to be done during the evaluation of the proposal. In
addition, public input is a required and essential component in the development review
process. Notice has been sent to residents and property owners within 600 feet of the project
site and to all properties within the Shannon Valley Ranch subdivision. In addition to the public
comments received at this meeting, all applicants are strongly encouraged to hold
neighborhood meetings to receive input as the design of the project evolves should they decide
to proceed with the development review process.
PAGE 2 OF 6 SUBJECT: 300 Mountain Laurel Lane/CD-22-003 DATE: May 6, 2022
N:\DEV\CDAC\CDAC Reports and Attachments\2022\05-11-22\Mountain Laurel Lane 300\Staff Report.300 Mountain Laurel Lane.docx
BACKGROUND:
The subject property is approximately 8.14 acres located in the northern portion of the
Shannon Valley Ranch subdivision (Attachment 1). A single-family residence was once located
on the property, but was destroyed by fire prior to the 2004 subdivision. The property is the
last undeveloped residential property in the subdivision.
In March 2002, the Town Council considered a project at 17101 Hicks Road and 14045 Shannon
Road and approved Ordinance 2097, amending the General Plan land use designation from
Agricultural to Hillside Residential and a Planned Development (PD) to change the zoning from
HR-5:Prezone to HR-5:PD to allow subdivision of the property into 14 single-family lots and
three open space lots (Attachment 3). Architecture and Site applications for new residences on
Lots 1 through 13 were approved in 2002 and 2003. The subdivision was completed in
November 2004 and subsequent Building Permits were issued in December of 2004. The 13
new residences were completed by 2007. In 2009, the Town Council approved an amendment
to the PD to allow accessory structures on all 14 lots, provided they comply with the Hillside
Development Standards and Guidelines (HDS&G) (Attachment 4).
The original PD application was considered numerous times by the Development Review
Committee and the Planning Commission prior to the Council’s action in March 2002. During
the final Planning Commission meeting on January 23, 2002, two members of the public spoke
on the project, offering comments specific to the size of the replacement residence on Lot 14
(Attachment 5, highlighted text). Both commenters expressed concern on whether developing
Lot 14 was appropriate, with one commenter adding that if Lot 14 is to be developed, it should
be rebuilt in the original footprint and not turned into a 4,600 or 4,800 square foot home. The
motion to forward a recommendation of approval to the Town Council included an additional
performance standard that Lot 14 be developed under the guidelines of a replacement
structure, similar in square footage, mass, and scale to the original residence that was
destroyed by fire. This additional performance standard was forwarded to the Council and
included in Ordinance 2097 and the amended Ordinance 2172 (Attachments 3 and 4,
Performance Standard #8). The Town Council approved the project in March 2002 with the
additional performance standard as recommended by the Planning Commission.
Town records for Lot 14 do not provide much detail on the original residence that was
destroyed by fire. An April 20, 2016, letter from Greenbriar Homes Communities (applicant
under the original PD application) to Mr. Alan Barbie of the Sereno Group indicates that the
original home was one story and approximately 2,400 square feet (Attachment 6). Other
anecdotal information indicates that the size of the original residence was closer to 3,000
square feet. Given the incomplete nature of the records for Lot 14, staff has messaged that the
lot could be developed with a single-story residence with a maximum size of 3,000 square feet
to be located in the general area of the previous residence subject to Architecture and Site
approval.
PAGE 3 OF 6 SUBJECT: 300 Mountain Laurel Lane/CD-22-003 DATE: May 6, 2022
N:\DEV\CDAC\CDAC Reports and Attachments\2022\05-11-22\Mountain Laurel Lane 300\Staff Report.300 Mountain Laurel Lane.docx
BACKGROUND (continued):
In addition to Lot 14, Performance Standard #8 limits the sizes of the residences on Lots 1
through 13 to a maximum of 4,850 square feet, with an average size of 4,650 square feet
(Attachment 4, Performance Standard 8). Additionally, two-thirds of the 13 residences are
limited to a one-story design. The table below provides a summary of the development on Lots
1 through 13.
Summary of developed lots.
Lot Address Residence Stories Garage Accessory Structure
1 280 Shannon Oaks Ln 4,656 sf 1 768 sf --
2 282 Shannon Oaks Ln 4,815 sf 2 799 sf --
3 286 Mountain Laurel Ln 4,655 sf 1 811 sf --
4 288 Mountain Laurel Ln 4,612 sf 1 781 sf --
5 290 Mountain Laurel Ln 4,815 sf 2 799 sf --
6 299 Mountain Laurel Ln 4,327 sf 1 806 sf --
7 297 Mountain Laurel Ln 4,635 sf 1 811 sf --
8 293 Mountain Laurel Ln 4,611 sf 1 781 sf --
9 291 Mountain Laurel Ln 4,655 sf 1 811 sf --
10 289 Mountain Laurel Ln 4,315 sf 1 806 sf --
11 287 Mountain Laurel Ln 4,814 sf 2 799 sf 636 sf
12 283 Shannon Oaks Ln 4,605 sf 1 781 sf 960 sf
13 281 Shannon Oaks Ln 4,808 sf 2 799 sf --
AVERAGE RESIDENCE: 4,640 sf 69 percent single story
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
The applicant has submitted a Conceptual Development Advisory Committee application
(Attachment 2) and a project description letter (Attachment 7) requesting preliminary review of
a proposal to amend the PD to allow for the construction of a residence larger than what the
PD currently permits on the subject property. The applicant’s letter indicates that they wish to
construct a single-story residence of 6,000 square feet. The applicant indicates that a larger
residence is needed to accommodate a large family and offers the following as justification for
the residence size:
• The proposed 6,000 square foot single-story residence would be consistent with the
development on neighboring properties;
• The current size limitation is not proportional to the size of the property (8.14 acres) or the
developable area (75,000 sf); and
• The high cost to develop a residence on the site is not proportional to the current size
limitation for a residence.
PAGE 4 OF 6 SUBJECT: 300 Mountain Laurel Lane/CD-22-003 DATE: May 6, 2022
N:\DEV\CDAC\CDAC Reports and Attachments\2022\05-11-22\Mountain Laurel Lane 300\Staff Report.300 Mountain Laurel Lane.docx
PROJECT DESCRIPTION (continued):
The applicant has provided a Site Plan showing a developable area of approximately 75,000
square feet (1.72 acres) served by a proposed 1,483-foot paved driveway with an average slope
of 17.1 percent (Attachment 7). The proposed driveway would follow the path of the existing
dirt driveway, taking access from the eastern end of Mountain Laurel Lane, rising approximately
250 feet along the western property line to the developable area identified by the applicant.
The slope of the proposed driveway would require an exception to the HDS&G, which limits
driveway slopes to a maximum of 15 percent and a maximum length of 300 feet.
Future development of the site as proposed would require an amendment to the PD Ordinance
and an Architecture and Site application, which would be subject to the Residential Design
Guidelines, HDS&G, and the Hillside Specific Plan.
EXISTING GENERAL PLAN, ZONING, AND PLANNING AREA:
1. General Plan land use designation: Hillside Residential, which provides for very low density
(0-1 dwelling units per net acre; up to 3.5 persons per acre), rural, large lot or cluster,
single-family residential development. This designation allows for development that is
compatible with the unique mountainous terrain and vegetation of parts of the Town.
2. Zoning designation: HR-5:PD, Hillside Residential (five to 40 acres for each dwelling unit)
with a Planned Development overlay. The intent and purpose of the HR zone is to provide
for an orderly, harmonious development of the foothills and mountains resulting in the
minimum amount of disturbance of the natural terrain through existing residential density
to the natural slope to encourage and provide incentive for excellence in design principles
and engineering techniques, and to provide for a variety of dwelling types where land
assembly and a unified development scheme are more appropriate. Slope-density
regulations will be utilized to assist in relating the intensity of development to the steepness
of terrain in order to minimize grading, removal of vegetation, runoff, erosion, geologic
hazards, fire hazards, and to help ensure utilization of land in balance with its natural
capabilities to support development.
3. Surrounding zoning designations: HR-1 to the north and east, HR-5 to the west and south.
EXISTING CONDITIONS:
The subject property has a gross lot area of 354,458 square feet (8.14 acres) with an average lot
slope of 28 percent. When adjusted for slope per the HDS&G, the net lot area is 163,051
square feet (3.74 acres); which would allow for 6,000 square feet of development without the
limitations imposed by the existing PD Ordinance. The subject property takes access from the
east end of Mountain Laurel Lane via a dirt driveway along the western property line accessing
the northeastern portion of the property, where the original residence once stood. This portion
of the property is relatively flat encompassing approximately 75,000 square feet (1.72 acres).
PAGE 5 OF 6 SUBJECT: 300 Mountain Laurel Lane/CD-22-003 DATE: May 6, 2022
N:\DEV\CDAC\CDAC Reports and Attachments\2022\05-11-22\Mountain Laurel Lane 300\Staff Report.300 Mountain Laurel Lane.docx
EXISTING CONDITIONS (continued):
The majority of the remaining portions of the property are steeply sloped and are held in a
scenic conservation easement.
POTENTIAL CONSIDERATIONS AND ISSUES:
The following is a brief list of issues and topics for consideration by the Committee. Staff has
not reached conclusions on these topics. Staff is identifying them here to help frame the
discussion and to solicit input. The main question for the Committee is whether or not the
applicant’s concept for the project creates a high-quality plan appropriate for Los Gatos in this
location. If an application is filed, staff would evaluate the technical issues.
1. General Plan
a. Policy LU-1.3 encourages preservation of existing trees, natural vegetation, natural
topography, riparian corridors and wildlife habitats, and promote high quality, well-
designed, environmentally sensitive, and diverse landscaping in new and existing
developments.
b. Policy LU-1.4 states, infill projects shall be designed in context with the
neighborhood and surrounding zoning with respect to existing scale and character
of surrounding structures, and should blend rather than compete with the
established character of the area.
c. Policy LU-6.8 states, new construction, remodels, and additions shall be compatible
and blend with the existing neighborhood.
d. Policy LU-7.3 states, infill projects shall contribute to the further development of
the surrounding neighborhood (e.g. improve circulation, contribute to or provide
neighborhood unity, eliminate a blighted area) and shall not detract from the
existing quality of life.
e. Policy LU-7.4 states, infill projects shall be designed in context with the
neighborhood and surrounding zoning with respect to the existing scale and
character of surrounding structures, and should blend rather than compete with
the established character of the area.
2. Zoning
a. Is the proposed residence size consistent with the PD zoning of the Shannon Valley
Ranch subdivision and the development on surrounding properties?
3. Circulation
a. Adequate access, that meets Town roadway and/or driveway requirements.
b. Driveway slopes would exceed the 15 percent limit in the HDS&G.
c. Driveway length would exceed the 300-foot limit in the HDS&G.
d. The Hillside Specific Plan prohibits access roads that result in excessive grading.
Would access and driveways require excessive grading?
e. Is a second means of emergency access/egress available?
PAGE 6 OF 6 SUBJECT: 300 Mountain Laurel Lane/CD-22-003 DATE: May 6, 2022
N:\DEV\CDAC\CDAC Reports and Attachments\2022\05-11-22\Mountain Laurel Lane 300\Staff Report.300 Mountain Laurel Lane.docx
POTENTIAL CONSIDERATIONS AND ISSUES (continued):
4. Visibility
a. The potential visibility of the future single-family residences from the Town’s
established viewing areas will need to be analyzed pursuant to the HDS&G. The
applicant proposes a single-story residence, which may be more compatible with
the limitations for a visible residence.
5. Potential Tree Impacts
a. An arborist report will be required during the development review process to
evaluate the potential impacts to trees.
b. Will the proposed driveway be located to avoid tree impacts?
c. Do underground electrical and telephone utility lines impact trees?
d. Do the water and sanitary sewer lines impact trees?
6. Other
a. The project would be evaluated for utilities, stormwater management, and other
engineering considerations.
b. Would the proposed residence be located within the Least Restrictive Development
Area (LRDA) as required by the HDS&G?
PUBLIC COMMENTS:
Public comments received by 11:00 a.m., Friday, May 6, 2022, are included as Attachment 8.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Location Map
2. CDAC Application
3. Ordinance 2097
4. Ordinance 2172
5. Planning Commission Minutes of January 23, 2002
6. Letter from Greenbriar Homes Communities, dated April 20, 2016
7. Project Description Letter with exhibits
8. Public comments received by 11:00 a.m., Friday, May 6, 2022
HICKS RDSANTA
R
O
S
A
D
R
SH
A
N
N
O
N
R
D GUADALUPE MINES RDSYCAMORE CREEK STCOLORADO CTS
H
A
N
N
O
N
O
A
K
S
L
N
BURKE
R
D
MAPLE CREEK300 Mountain Laurel Lane
0 0.250.125 Miles
°
Update Notes:
- Updated 12/20/17 to link to tlg-sql12 server data (sm)
- Updated 11/22/19 adding centerpoint guides, Buildings layer, and Project Site leader with label
- Updated 10/8/20 to add street centerlines which can be useful in the hillside area
- Updated 02-19-21 to link to TLG-SQL17 database (sm)
ATTACHMENT 1
This Page
Intentionally
Left Blank
ATTACHMENT 2
This Page
Intentionally
Left Blank
ORDINANCE 2097
ORDINANCE OF THE TOWN OF LOS GATOS AMENDING THE TOWN CODE
EFFECTING A ZONE CHANGE FROM RC AND HR -5 PREZONE TO HR -5:PD FOR
PROPERTY LOCATED AT 17101 HICKS ROAD AND 14045 SHANNON ROAD
THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF LOS GATOS DOES ORDAIN AS
FOLLOWS:
SECTION I
The Town Code of the Town of Los Gatos is hereby amended to change the zoning on
property at 17101 Hicks Road and 14045 Shannon Road (Santa Clara County Assessor Parcel
Numbers 537 -18 -001, 567 -24 -008 and 567 -23 -041) as shown on the map attached hereto as Exhibit
A, and is part of this Ordinance, from RC (Resource Conservation) and HR -5 (Hillside Residential,
5 Acres per Dwelling Unit) to HR -5:PD (Hillside Residential, 5 Acres per Dwelling Unit, Planned
Development).
SECTION II
The PD (Planned Development Overlay) zone established by this Ordinance authorizes the
following construction and use of improvements:
1. Demolition of two existing pre -1941 and two post -1941 single family residences and
one pre -1941 barn.
2. Construction of 13 new single - family dwelling units and reconstruction of one single -
family dwelling that was destroyed by fire.
3. Landscaping, streets, trails, and other improvements shown and required on the
Official Development Plan.
4. Dedication of 45.4 acres of hillside and riparian open space as shown on the Official
Development Plans.
5. Dedication of trail easements to the Town of Los Gatos as shown on the Official
Development Plans.
6. Uses permitted are those specified in the HR (Hillside Residential) zone by Sections
29.40.235 (Permitted Uses) and 29.20.185 (Conditional Uses) of the Zoning
Ordinance, as those sections exist at the time of the adoption of this Ordinance, or as
they may be amended in the future. However, no use listed in Section 29.20.185 is
Page 1 of 17
ATTACHMENT 3
allowed unless specifically authorized by this Ordinance, or by a Conditional Use
Permit.
SECTION III
COMPLIANCE WITH OTHER DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
All provisions of the Town Code apply, except when the Official Development Plan
specifically shows otherwise.
SECTION IV
Architecture and Site Approval and Subdivision Approval is required before construction
work for the dwelling units is performed, whether or not a permit is required for the work and before
any permit for construction is issued. Construction permits shall only be in a manner complying with
Section 29.80.130 of the Town Code.
SECTION V
The attached Exhibit A (Map), and Exhibit B (Official Development Plans), are part of the
Official Development Plan. The following conditions must be complied with before issuance of any
grading, or construction permits:
TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT:
Planning Division
1. EXPIRATION/USE OF APPROVAL. The approval for the requested zone change from RC
Resource Conservation) and HR -5 prezone (Hillside Residential, 5 Acres per Dwelling
Unit) to HR -5:PD (Hillside Residential, 5 Acres per Dwelling Unit, Planned Development)
shall expire two years from the date of approval unless the application has been vested
pursuant to Town Code Section 29.20.320.
2. ARCHITECTURE AND SITE APPROVAL REQUIRED. A separate Architecture and Site
application and approval is required for the residential units proposed.
3. OFFICIAL DEVELOPMENT PLANS. The Official Development Plans provided is
conceptual in nature. Final footprints and building designs shall be determined during the
architecture and site approval process.
4. HOUSE SITING. The siting of the homes shall be determined during the Architecture &
Site approval process.
Page 2 of 17
5. RECYCLING. All wood, metal, glass and aluminum materials generated from the
demolished structures shall be deposited to a company which will recycle the materials.
Receipts from the company(s) accepting these materials, noting type and weight of material,
shall be submitted to the Town prior to the Town's demolition inspection and the issuance
of any building permits.
6. TREE REMOVAL PERMIT. A Tree Removal Permit shall be obtained for the removal of
any ordinance sized tree prior to the issuance of a Building, Grading or Encroachment
Permit.
7. FENCING. Fence locations shall be reviewed and approved during the Architecture & Site
review(s), including privacy and yard fencing. Developer will include in the CC &R's for the
project a restriction limiting the home owners from replacing the fence type as installed by
the Developer and as shown on the Official Development Plans, or as otherwise approved
during the Architecture & Site review(s). Any replacement or addition of other fence types
shall be restricted to open fence types including wood with wire mesh and wood or concrete
split -rail fencing. Solid fencing will be permitted only where installed by the Developer and
as shown on the approved development plans. CC &R's shall require fences to be set back
a minimum of 10 feet for from property lines.
8. BUILDING SQUARE FOOTAGE. All proj ect homes will be limited to a maximum size of
4,850 square feet with an average of 4,650 square feet, and at least 2/3 of the homes shall be
limited to a one story design. Final building design and size will be determined during
Architecture and Site review. No further expansion of the homes will be allowed unless this
Ordinance is amended by the Town Council. Lot 14 shall be developed under guidelines of
a replacement structure and shall be similar is size, mass and scale to the original home that
was destroyed by fire.
9. SETBACKS. The minimum setbacks are those specified by the HR -5 zoning district.
10. HEIGHT. The maximum height for single -story homes shall be 25 feet and the maximum
height for two -story homes shall be 30 feet.
11. EXTERIOR LIGHTING. All exterior lighting shall be reviewed and approved as part of the
Architecture & Site review(s). Lighting shall be down directed, and no street lighting shall
be included in the development. If it is determined that lighting is needed for safety reasons
at the intersection of Hicks Road and the new road into the development, a street light may
be required, but only if there is not alternative safety devices that can adequately delineate
the intersection. If it is determined that a new light must be installed, it shall be designed to
only illuminate the minimum area necessary for safety.
12. "BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES MITIGATION MEASURE 6 -3a. During the design phase,
the property owner /developer shall implement the following measures:
a. Any plan affecting trees shall be reviewed by the Consulting Arborist to ensure that
improvement plans, utility and drainage plans, grading plans, landscape and irrigation
plans, and demolition plans will not adversely affect the tree to be retained.
b. The horizontal and vertical elevations of trees to be preserved within development
areas shall be established and included on all plans.
C. The Consulting Arborist shall identify a Tree Protection Zone for trees to be
preserved in which no soil disturbance is permitted. For design purposes, the Tree
Protection Zone shall be defined by the dripline. Where development must encroach
Page 3 of 17
within the dripline, the Consulting Arborist shall identify an appropriate Tree
Protection Zone.
d. No underground services including utilities, sub - drains, water or sewer shall be
placed in the Tree Protection Zone.
e. Tree Preservation Notes shall be included on all plans.
f. Any herbicides placed under paving materials must be safe for use around trees and
labeled for that use.
g. Irrigation systems must be designed so that no trenching will occur within the Tree
Protection Zone.
13. "BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES MITIGATION MEASURE 6 -3b. During the pre -
construction phase, the property owner /developer shall take the following measures:
a. A fence shall be constructed around all trees to be retained and it shall completely
enclose the Tree Protection Zone prior to demolition, grubbing, or grading. Fencing
shall be 6 -foot chain link or equivalent. Fencing shall be placed at the dripline or as
otherwise directed by the Consulting Arborist. Fences are to remain until all grading
and construction is completed.
b. All trees to be retained shall be pruned within and adjacent to development areas
shall be reviewed by a certified arborist to determine which trees should be pruned
to clean the crown, reduce end weight and /or provide clearance. Tree #201 will
require pruning to reduce weight throughout the crown. Clearance shall be provided
by selectively thinning low - hanging lateral branches.
C. All pruning shall be performed by a Certified Arborist or Tree Worker in accordance
with the Tree Pruning Guidelines of the International Society of Arboriculture.
d. Prior to the start of any demolition and clearing, the Consulting Arborist will meet
with the demolition, grading and other relevant contractors to review limits of
construction activity, identify areas requiring fencing, identify trees to be removed
and review work procedures.
14. "BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES MITIGATION MEASURE 6-3C. Prior to the construction
phase of the project, the applicant shall take the following measures:
a. Any grading, construction demolition, or other work within the Tree Protection Zone
shall be monitored by the Consulting Arborist.
b. Any root pruning required for construction purposes shall receive the prior approval
of, and be supervised by, the Consulting Arborist.
C. If any injury to a tree should occur during construction, it should be evaluated as soon
as possible by the Consulting Arborist so that appropriate treatments can be made.
d. Root- injured trees have a limited capacity to absorb water. Therefore, it is important
to ensure adequate soil moisture in the area of active roots. One to several irrigations
may be needed for trees that are at risk of impacts. Irrigations shall be specified by
the Consulting Arborist.
e. No excess soil, chemical, debris, equipment or other materials shall be dumped or
stored within the Tree Protection Zone.
f. Any additional pruning required to provide clearance during construction shall be
performed by a Certified Arborist and not construction personnel.
15. "BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES MITIGATION MEASURE 6 -3d. Following construction,
Page 4 of 17
r
a comprehensive management plan for the trees shall be developed that considers the broad
objectives of development as well as the needs of the specific species. This management
plan shall specify pruning, fertilization, mulch, pest management, replanting and irrigation
requirements. In addition, provisions for monitoring both tree health and structural stability
following construction must be made a priority. As trees age, the likelihood of failure of
branches or entire trees increases. Therefore, the management plan must include an annual
inspection for hazard potential.
16. * *BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES MITIGATION MEASURE 6 -4. To minimize impacts on
nesting raptors, the applicant shall complete necessary pre- construction surveys and
monitoring. If it is not possible to schedule construction between August and February, then
pre- construction surveys for nesting raptors will be conducted by a qualified ornithologist
in order to ensure that no raptor nests will be disturbed during project construction. This
survey will be conducted no more than 15 days prior to the initiation of construction
activities during the early part of the breeding season (February through April) and no more
than 30 days prior to the initiation of these activities during the late part of the breeding
season (May through August). During this survey, the biologist will inspect all trees in and
immediately adjacent to the impact areas for raptor nests. If an active raptor nest is found
close enough to the construction area to be disturbed by these activities, the ornithologist, in
consultation with CDFG, will determine the extent of a construction -free buffer zone to be
established around the nest.
17. * *BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES MITIGATION MEASURE 6 -5a. To minimize impacts on
yellow warblers, the property owner /developer shall retain sycamore riparian habitat along
Shannon Creek and shall maintain setbacks of at least 50 feet between proposed development
and sycamore riparian habitat. If a small amount of development encroaches into this 50-
foot setback, then this encroachment (indirect impact) shall be mitigated by planting riparian
habitat at a 1:1 ratio.
18. * *BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES MITIGATION MEASURE 6 -5b. The property
owner /developer shall implement the following measures to minimize potential impacts on
any roosting bats:
a. Surveys shall be conducted up to one year in advance of building demolition and tree
removal, if possible, to determine if active roosts are present. These surveys shall not
substitute for pre - construction/pre - disturbance surveys for nesting raptors, as bats
could move on or adjacent to the site between survey periods. If roosting bats are
found during these surveys, either avoidance of the maternity roost season,
establishment of buffer zones or exclusion of bats shall be implemented as
appropriate.
b. Avoidance: Construction activities involving potential roost sites shall be conducted
outside the maternity roost season if the project commences after young are volant
by July 31 and finished before the formation of maternity roosts begins (as early as
March 1).
C. Pre - demolition Surveys and Buffer Zones: If the project schedule does not allow for
early detection surveys to occur, a pre - demolition survey for roosting bats shall be
conducted by a qualified bat biologist 14 days prior to construction as determined by
a Memorandum of Understanding with the California Department of Fish & Game
Page 5 of 17
CDFG) prior to any removal of buildings, particularly those with closed areas such
as an attic space, or trees 12 inches in diameter. No activities that would result in
disturbance to active roosts shall proceed prior to the completed surveys. If no active
roosts are found, then no further action is warranted. If a maternity roost were
present, a qualified bat biologist shall determine the extent of construction -free zones
around active nurseries located during surveys. CDFG shall also be notified of any
active nurseries within the construction zone.
d. Surveys: Initial surveys can be conducted any time prior to the pre - demolition
surveys to establish if a particular location has supported, or supports, roosting bats.
A survey for indications of nursery roosts shall be conducted prior to March 1. If
indications of a maternity roost are present, the structure can be removed or modified
before a maternity roost becomes reestablished.
e. Exclude Bats Prior to Construction Near Roost: Bats can be excluded after July 31
and before March 1 to prevent the formation of maternity colonies. Such non-
breeding bats can be safely evicted, under the direction of a qualified bat biologist,
by sealing crevices and providing them one -way exclusion doors. Such a device
should be employed in all expansion joints during dark hours as a temporary device
to prevent the formation of a maternity colony. In order not to exclude all potential
maternity roost habitat at once, only one -half of the expansion j oints should be sealed
at any one given time during the maternity colony- nesting season. This should allow
bats to leave during dark hours, thus increasing their chance of finding new roosts
with a minimum of potential predation during daylight. After construction, all
exclusion devices shall be removed to allow bats to re- establish habitat for colonies.
19. "BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES MITIGATION MEASURE 6 -6. The property
owner /developer shall implement the following protection measures to mitigate impacts to
the red - legged frog (see Addendum to the project EIR for additional details):
a. Avoidance to the extent possible.
b. Minimization. The project shall be designed, built and operated in the following
ways that will minimize both direct and indirect impacts to these species. Any
construction near or adjacent to the Shannon Creek drainage will be preceded by a
pre- construction survey. The existing culvert over the Shannon Creek drainage will
not be widened and will only be used as an EVA road. The primary egress and
ingress for the project will be off of Hicks Road. In addition, impacts relating to the
construction of the outfalls for the project are likely to be covered by the
Programmatic Section 7 for the red - legged frog. If formal consultation (via Section
7) for the red - legged frog is required, then the project applicant shall implement all
of the Minimization measures outlined in the Programmatic Section 7 Biological
Opinion.
C. Compensation by Wetland Creation. Any impacts from the project (i.e., outfalls)
shall be mitigated by creating habitat on -site at a minimum of 1:1 ratio.
d. Compensation by Riparian Restoration. A riparian restoration plan for mitigation
shall be developed by a qualified biologist. The mitigation area(s) should be
designed to expand existing riparian vegetation and re- create high quality riparian
habitat along the Shannon Creek drainage and northern drainage. The mitigation
Page 6 of 17
f °l
goal is to create and enhance riparian habitat with habitat functions and values equal
to, or greater than those existing along the Shannon Creek drainage and northern
drainage. The final species selection and configuration shall be determined during
final mitigation design. The trees and shrubs to be installed should be of local origin,
preferably contract grown from seed or cuttings from within five miles of the site.
e. A detailed monitoring plan including specific success criteria shall be developed and
submitted to The Town of Los Gatos for approval. The mitigation area will be
monitored in accordance with the plan approved by the Town. The basic components
of the monitoring plan are final success criteria, performance criteria, monitoring
methods, data analysis, as -built plans, monitoring schedule, contingency /remedial
measures and reporting requirements.
f. Specific success criteria and characteristics shall be developed during preparation of
the mitigation and monitoring plan. At a minimum, the final success criteria shall
include absolute percent cover by native trees and shrubs of 60% and 40 %,
respectively. The performance criteria should include tree and shrub survival at three
years of 80% of the original planting. If the final encroachment estimates exceed 1.0
acre, monitoring of the mitigation site shall be conducted for 10 years. Annual
monitoring reports shall be sent to the appropriate agencies. If the required
mitigation planting is less than 1.0 acres, monitoring shall be conducted annually for
five years.
g. During the development of the riparian restoration plan, an appropriate area (or areas)
shall be identified to replace encroachment impacts at a 1:1 basis.
h. Maintain Water Quality ofthe Watershed. The project shall be designed, constructed
and built in such a way as to maintain the water quality in the adjacent drainage
channels and ponds. Appropriate best management practices (BMPs) shall be
developed for the project.
20. SOLAR WATER SYSTEM. Each residence shall be pre - plumbed for a solar water heater
system prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy.
21. COLOR REFLECTIVITY DEED RESTRICTION. Prior to the issuance of a building
permit, a deed restriction shall be recorded by the applicant with the Santa Clara County
Recorder's Office that requires all exterior paint colors to be maintained in conformance with
the Town's Hillside Development Standards.
22. SUBDIVISION REQUIRED. A separate tentative map application submittal and approval
is required for the proposed project prior to the issuance of building permits.
23. BELOW MARKET PRICE (BMP) IN -LIEU FEE: A Below Market Price (BMP) in -lieu fee
shall be paid by the property owner /developer pursuant to Town Code Section 29.10.3025
and any applicable Town Resolutions. The fee amount shall be based upon the Town
Council fee resolution in effect at the time a final or vesting tentative map is approved.
24. FINAL CC &R's. Final CC &R's shall be approved by the Town Attorney prior to the
recording of the Final Map. The CC &R's shall include provisions for traffic circulation,
vehicle parking enforcement procedures, and landscaping, exterior lighting and fencing
restrictions. The approved CC &R's shall become conditions of this Ordinance.
Building Division
Page 7 of 17
25. PERMITS REQUIRED. A building permit application shall be required for each proposed
structure. Separate Electrical /Mechanical /Plumbing permit shall be required as necessary.
26. CONSTRUCTION PLANS. The Conditions of Approval shall be stated in full on the cover
sheet of the construction plan submitted for building permit.
27. SIZE OF PLANS. The maximum size of construction plans submitted for building permits
shall be 24 inches by 36 inches.
28. PLANS. The construction plans for this project shall be prepared under direct supervision
of a licensed architect or engineer (Business and Professionals Code Section 5538).
29. DEMOLITION REQUIREMENTS. Contact the Bay Area Air Quality Management District
at (495) 771 -6000 and complete their process as necessary before obtaining a demolition
permit from the Town Building Department. No demolition work shall be done without first
obtaining a demolition permit from the Town.
30. SOILS REPORT. Two copies of a soils report, prepared to the satisfaction of the Building
Official, containing foundation and retaining wall design recommendations, shall be
submitted with the building permit application. This report shall be prepared by a licensed
civil engineer specializing in soils mechanics.
31. FOUNDATION INSPECTIONS. A pad certificate prepared by a licensed civil engineer or
land surveyor shall be submitted to the project building inspector upon foundation
inspection. This certificate shall certify compliance with the recommendations as specified
in the soils report and the building pad elevation and on -site retaining wall locations and
elevations are prepared according to approved plans. Horizontal and vertical controls shall
be set and certified by a licensed surveyor or registered civil engineer for the following items:
a. Pad elevation
b. Finish floor elevation
C. Foundation corner locations
32. RESIDENTIAL TOWN ACCESSIBILITY STANDARDS. The residences shall be designed
with adaptability features for single - family residences per Town Resolution 1994 -61.
a. Wooden backing (no smaller than 2- inches by eight- inches) shall be provided in all
bathroom walls at water closets, showers and bathtub, located at 34- inches from the
floor to the center of the backing, suitable for installation of grab bars.
b. All passage doors shall have a 36 -inch wide door including a five foot by five foot
level landing no more than one -inch out of plane with the immediate interior floor
level, with an 18 -inch clearance at interior strike edge.
C. Door buzzer, bell or chime shall be hard wired.
33. SOLAR HOT WATER HEATING. The residences shall be pre- plumbed for solar hot water
heating. The plans shall show the location of a stub and valve located in the attics for solar
heating use.
34. TITLE 24 ENERGY COMPLIANCE. California Title 24 Energy Compliance forms CR-
IR and MF -IR shall be printed on the construction plans.
35. HAZARDOUS FIRE ZONE. This project requires Class A roofing assembly.
36. TOWN FIREPLACE STANDARDS. New fireplaces shall be EPA Phase II approved
appliances per Town Ordinance 1905. Tree limbs within 10 feet of chimneys shall be cut.
37. SPECIAL INSPECTIONS. When a special inspection is required by UBC Section 1701, the
architect or engineer of record shall prepare an inspection program that shall be submitted
Page 8 of 17
0
to the Building Official for approval prior to issuance of any building permits, in accordance
with UBC Section 106.3.5. Please obtain Town Special Inspection form from the Building
Division Service Counter. The Town Special Inspection schedule shall be printed on the
construction plans.
38. NON -POINT SOURCE POLLUTION STANDARDS. The Town standard Santa Clara
Valley Non -point Source Pollution Control Program specification sheet shall be part of plan
submittal. The specification sheet is available at the Building Division service counter.
39. ADDITIONAL AGENCY APPROVALS REQUIRED. The project requires the following
agencies approval before issuance of a building permit:
a. West Valley Sanitation District 378 -2407
b. Santa Clara County Fire Department: 378 -4010
C. Lots 1 -13: Los Gatos School District: 335 -2000
d. Lot 14: Union School District: 377 -8010
Note: Obtain the school district forms from the Town Building Department, after the
Building Department has approved the building plans.
TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE DIRECTOR OF PARKS & PUBLIC WORKS:
Engineering Division
40. GRADING. Grading shall be kept to a minimum to construct the roads within the project.
Any future grading will be considered at the time of Architecture & Site review(s).
41. GRADING PERMIT. A grading permit is required for all on -site grading, erosion control
and improvements (roadway, storm drainage, utilities, lighting, etc.). A separate application
for a grading permit (with grading plans) shall be made to the Engineering Division of the
Parks & Public Works Department. The grading plans shall include final grading, drainage,
retaining wall location, driveway, utilities and interim erosion control. Unless specifically
allowed by the Director of Parks & Public Works, the grading permit will be issued
concurrently with the building permit.
42. SOILS REPORT. One copy of the soils and geologic report shall be submitted with the
grading permit application. The soils report shall include specific criteria and standards
governing site grading, drainage, pavement design, retaining wall design, and erosion
control. The report shall be signed and "wet stamped" by the engineer or geologist, in
conformance with Section 6735 of the California Business and Professions Code.
43. FINAL MAP. A final map shall be recorded. Two copies of the final map shall be submitted
to the Engineering Division of the Parks & Public Works Department for review and
approval. The submittal shall include closure calculations, title report and appropriate fees.
The map shall be recorded prior to issuance of any building permits for the project.
44. DEDICATIONS. The following shall be dedicated prior to issuance of any permits:
a. Hicks Road. A 40 -foot half street right -of -way with the chord of a 20 -foot radius at
the intersection with the new street.
b. Shannon Road. A 20 -foot half street right -of -way.
C. New interior streets. A 40 -foot street right -of -way with the chord of a 20 -foot radius
at all intersections and a standard 42 -foot radius cul -de -sac.
d. Public Service Easement (PSE). Ten (10) feet wide, next to the new street right -of-
Page 9 of 17
i
ways.
e. Ingress- egress, storm drainage and sanitary sewer easements, as required.
f. Trail Easement. Ten (10) to twenty (20) feet wide, as shown on the Official
Development Plan.
g. Emergency Access Easement. Twenty (20) feet wide, from the new public road to
Shannon Road, as shown on the Official Development Plans.
45. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS. The following improvements shall be installed by the
developer. Plans for those improvements shall be prepared by a California registered civil
engineer, reviewed and approved by the Town, and guaranteed by contract, Faithful
Performance Security and Labor & Materials Security before the issuance of a building
permit or the recordation of a map. The improvements must be completed and accepted by
the Town before a Certificate of Occupancy for any new building can be issued.
a. New Streets. Curb, gutter, new street paving, signing, striping, storm drainage and
sanitary sewers, as required. Curbs shall be rolled concrete to the satisfaction of the
Director of Parks and Public Works.
46. INSURANCE. One million dollars ($1,000,000) of liability insurance holding the Town
harmless shall be provided in a format acceptable to the Town Attorney before recordation
of the map.
47. TRAFFIC IMPACT MITIGATION FEE (RESIDENTIAL). The developer shall pay a
proportional the project's share of transportation improvements needed to serve cumulative
development within the Town of Los Gatos. The fee amount will be based upon the Town
Council resolution in effect at the time the request of Certificate of Occupancy is made. The
fee shall be paid before issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy. The traffic impact
mitigation fee for each new house in this project using the current fee schedule is $5,730.
The final fee shall be calculated from the final plans using the rate schedule in effect at the
time of the request for a Certificate of Occupancy. Credit shall be given for the house on Lot
14, where a house was previous located, and for the three residences to be demolished.
48. GENERAL. All public improvements shall be made according to the latest adopted Town
Standard Drawings and the Town Standard Specifications or as otherwise approved by the
Director of Parks and Public Works. All work shall conform to the applicable Town
ordinances. The adjacent public right -of -way shall be kept clear of all job related dirt and
debris at the end of the day. Dirt and debris shall not be washed into storm drainage
facilities. The storing of goods and materials on the sidewalk and /or the street will not be
allowed unless a special permit is issued. The developer's representative in charge shall be
at the job site during all working hours. Failure to maintain the public right -of -way
according to this condition may result in the Town performing the required maintenance at
the developer's expense.
49. ENCROACHMENT PERMIT. All work in the public right -of -way will require a
Construction Encroachment Permit. All work over $5,000 will require construction security.
50. PUBLIC WORKS INSPECTIONS. The developer or his representative shall notify the
Engineering Inspector at least twenty -four (24) hours before starting an work pertaining to
on -site drainage facilities, grading or paving, and all work in the Town's right -of -way.
Failure to do so will result in rejection ow work that went on without inspection.
51. GRADING MORATORIUM. No grading or earth- disturbing activities shall be initiated in
Page 10 of 17
1
hillside areas between October 1 and April 15 of each year. For grading operations
commenced before October 1, all grading or earth - disturbing activities shall cease October
15 and will not be allowed to restart until April 15. Grading permits will not be issued
between September 15 and April 15. These limitations include, but are not limited to these
items: driveways, building pads, foundation trenches and drilled piers, retaining walls,
swimming pools, tennis courts, outbuildings and utility trenches. Install interim erosion
control measures, shown on the approved interim erosion control plan, by October 1, if final
landscaping is not in place. Maintain the interim erosion control measures throughout the
October 1 to April 15 period.
52. GRADING INSPECTIONS. The soils engineer or her /his qualified representative shall
continuously inspect all grading operations. The soils engineer shall submit a final grading
report before occupancy /Certificate of Completion.
53. SURVEYING CONTROLS. Horizontal and vertical controls shall be set and certified by
a licensed surveyor or registered civil engineer qualified to practice land surveying, for the
following items:
a. Retaining wall - -top of wall elevations and locations.
b. Toe and top of cut and fill slopes.
C. Top of future curb along one side of the new street.
54. EROSION CONTROL. Interim and final erosion control plans shall be prepared and
submitted to the Engineering Development Division of the Parks & Public Works
Department. A Notice of Intent (NOI) shall be submitted to the San Francisco Bay Regional
Water Quality Control Board. A Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) shall be
submitted to the Town Engineering Division concurrently with the grading permit
application. Grading activities shall be limited to the period of least rainfall (April 15 to
October 1). A maximum of two weeks is allowed between clearing of an area/building on
an area if grading is allowed during the rainy season. In addition, straw bales and plastic
sheeting shall be stored on -site for emergency control, if needed. Install fiber berms, check
dams, retention basins, silt fences, erosion control blankets and fiber rolls as needed on the
project site, to protect down stream water quality during winter months.
55. SILT AND MUD IN PUBLIC RIGHT -OF -WAY. It is the responsibility of contractor and
home owner to make sure that all dirt tracked into the public right -of -way is cleaned up on
a daily basis. Mud, silt, concrete and other construction debris SHALL NOT be washed into
the Town's storm drains or creeks.
56. NPDES REQUIREMENTS. All work within the project shall be in conformance with the
National Pollution Discharge Elimination System permit issued to local agencies within
Santa Clara County by the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board on
October 17, 2001.
57. FISH & GAME REQUIREMENTS. A "1603" permit shall be obtained for the California
Department of Fish & Game for proposed improvements in or near riparian areas within that
agency's jurisdiction. A copy of the permit shall be provided to the Parks & Public Works
Department before any permits are issued /final map is recorded.
58. UTILITIES. The developer shall install all utility services, including telephone, electric
power and all other communications lines underground, as required by Town Code
27.50.015(b). Cable television capability shall be provided to all new lots.
Page 11 of 17
59. RESTORATION OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS. The developer shall repair or replace all
existing improvements not designated for removal that are damaged or removed because of
developer's operations. Improvements such as, but not limited to: curbs, gutters, sidewalks,
driveways, signs, pavements, raised pavement markers, thermoplastic pavement markings,
etc. shall be repaired and replaced to a condition equal to or better than the original
condition. Existing improvement to be repaired or replaced shall be at the direction of the
Engineering Construction Inspector, and shall comply with all Title 24 Disabled Access
provisions. Developer shall request a walk - through with the Engineering Construction
Inspector before the start of construction to verify existing conditions.
60. DRIVEWAY APPROACH. The developer shall install a minimum of one (1) Town
standard residential driveway approach for each lot. The new driveway approaches shall be
constructed per Town Standard Detail.
61. LOT 14 DRIVEWAY. The driveway to Lot 14 shall be the minimum width required to
provide fire access. The intent is to minimize the visibility of the driveway.
62. AS -BUILT PLANS. After completion of the construction of all work in the public right -of-
way or public easements, the original plans shall have all changes (change orders and field
changes) clearly marked. The "as- built" plans shall again be signed and "wet- stamped" by
the civil engineer who prepared the plans, attesting to the changes. The original "as- built"
plans shall be review and approved the Engineering Construction Inspector. A Mylar of the
approved "as- built" plans shall be provided to the Town before the Faithful Performance
Security is released.
63. SANITARY SEWER LATERAL. Sanitary sewer laterals are televised by West Valley
Sanitation District and approved by the Town of Los Gatos before they are used or reused.
Install a sanitary sewer lateral clean -out at the property line of each new lot.
64. SIDEWALK REPAIR. The developer shall repair and replace to existing Town standards
any sidewalk damaged now or during construction of this project. Sidewalk repair shall
match existing color, texture and design, and shall be constructed per Town Standard Detail.
The limits of sidewalk repair will be determined by the Engineering Construction Inspector
during the construction phase of the project.
65. CURB AND GUTTER. The developer shall repair and replace to existing Town standards
any curb and gutter damaged now or during construction of this project. New curb and gutter
shall be constructed per Town Standard Detail. The limits of curb and gutter repair will be
determined by the Engineering Construction Inspector during the construction phase of the
proj ect.
66. CURB RAMPS. The developer shall construct curb ramp according to State Standard
Drawings at all intersections. The actual "Case" as shown on the standard to be used will
be decided by the Engineering Construction Inspector during the construction phase of the
proj ect.
67. "HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY MITIGATION MEASURE 7 -3. Energy
dissipaters should be provided at the outfalls of proposed storm drains to minimize the
increased potential for erosion hazards due to project development.
68. "HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY MITIGATION MEASURE 7 -4. A Storm
Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) shall be prepared prior to start of construction.
The SWPPP and project plans shall be reviewed by the Town Engineering staff. The
Page 12 of 17
C.
SWPPP shall be in conformance with the Santa Clara County NPDES Permit as amended
by the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board ( RWQCB) on October 17,
2001. The SWPPP shall be approved concurrently with the grading, drainage and erosion
control plans. Reference the Addendum to the EIR for additional details.
69. * *HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY MITIGATION MEASURE The proj ect design
shall incorporate water quality mitigation measures in accordance with current NPDES
requirements. Water quality measures should include use of biofilters, drainage swales, and
detention facilities to mitigate non -point source impacts. In addition, the SCVWD and
RWQCB recommend the incorporation of site planning design measures to help reduce
potential contributions of urban pollutants from the project. See the Addendum to the EIR
for additional details.
70. * *TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC MITIGATION MEASURE 8 -2. In order to
minimize potential traffic safety impacts the property owner /developer shall take the
following measures:
a. Adequate sight distance shall be provided for the project access road /Hicks Road
intersection through removal of vegetation and grading of the embankment.
b. A stop sign shall be installed to control traffic on the project access road to Hicks
Road. The stop sign for the proposed driveway shall be located along and parallel
to the north edge of pavement on Hicks Road.
C. Warning signs shall be installed indicating a "T" intersection along Hicks Road
approaching the new driveway. These signs shall be located approximately 300 feet
east and west of the project entrance /Hicks Road intersection.
d. Traffic reflectors shall be installed on the south side of Hicks Road at the intersection
with the entrance road to the project.
71. * *TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC MITIGATION MEASURE 8 -3. A separate
pedestrian trail shall be installed along the north side of Hicks Road.
72. "TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC MITIGATION MEASURE 8 -4. Use of trails by
bicyclists, particularly the trail parallel to Hicks Road, shall be considered during
Architecture and Site review. In addition, design issues such as the appropriateness of trail
widths, pavement versus compacted earth, and trailhead facilities shall be considered during
Architecture and Site Review.
73. GEOTECHNICAL REVIEW OF SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENT PLANS. The project
geotechnical consultant shall review and approve all geotechnical aspects of the subdivision
improvement plans to ensure that their recommendations have been properly incorporated.
The results of the plan review shall be summarized by the geotechnical consultant in a letter
and submitted to the Town Engineer for review, prior to issuance of permits for construction
of subdivision level improvements.
74. GEOTECHNICAL PLAN REVIEW (LOTS 1 THROUGH 13). The project geotechnical
consultant shall review and approve all geotechnical aspects of the project building and
grading plans for individual residences on Lots 1 through 13. To ensure that their
recommendations have been properly incorporated. The consultant shall verify that
recommended measures to address potential debris flows on Lot 6, and potential co- seismic
ground deformation on Lots 1 and 13 have been incorporated.
75. GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION (LOT 14). The project geotechnical consultant shall
Page 13 of 17
0
complete a site specific soil and foundation investigation as a basis for preparing
recommended geotechnical design parameters for Lot 14 residential improvements. The
results of this investigation shall be submitted to the Town for review by the Town Engineer
and Town Geotecbnical Consultant prior to approval of a site specific development plan.
76. GEOTECHNICAL FIELD INVESTIGATION. The project geotechnical consultant shall
inspect, test (as needed), and approve all geotechnical aspects of the project construction.
The results of these inspections and the as -built conditions of the project shall be described
by the project geotechnical consultant in a letter and submitted to the Town Engineer for
review prior to final inspection.
For further detail on conditions 71 through 74, see the letter from Cotton, Shires &
Associates dated February 12, 2002.
Parks Division
77. AERATION TUBES. All impervious surface encroaching under the dripline of existing
trees shall have aeration tubes installed and these tube locations shown on the plans.
78. IRRIGATION. All newly planted landscaping shall be irrigated by an in- ground irrigation
system. Special care shall be taken to avoid irrigation which will endanger existing native
trees and vegetation.
79. BUILDING FOUNDATIONS: Any buildings under the dripline of existing trees shall have
a foundation built from pier and grade beam to minimize impaction on existing trees.
80. TREE STAKING: All newly planted trees are required to be double staked to Town
standards.
81. GENERAL. All existing and newly planted trees shown on the plan are specific subjects of
approval of this plan and must remain on site.
82. IRRIGATION SYSTEM. Water efficient irrigation systems shall be utilized to conserve
water in all project irrigation of publicly landscaped areas.
83. VEGETATIVE SCREENING. Vegetative screening shall be used along the development
edges, where appropriate, to soften views of peripheral buildings and to integrate landscaping
and native vegetation.
84. WATER EFFICIENT ORDINANCE. This project is subject to the Town's Water Efficient
Ordinance. A fee of $472 is required when the landscape, irrigation plans, and water
calculations are submitted for review.
85. TREE PROTECTION. Tree protection fencing shall be placed at the dripline of existing
trees to be saved in the area of construction. Fencing shall be four feet high chain link
attached to steel poles driven two feet into the ground when at the dripline of the tree. If the
fence has to be within eight feet of the trunk of the tree a fence base may be used, as in a
typical chain link fence that is rented. The fencing must be inspected and approved by the
Parks Superintendent and must be installed prior to issuance of a grading and /or building
permit.
86. ORNAMENTAL LANDSCAPING. All formal landscaping shall be within 30 feet of the
perimeter of the houses. Any planting beyond the 30 -foot perimeter shall be native
vegetation that is drought and fire resistant, and planted in natural clusters.
87. LANDSCAPE GUIDELINES. The adopted landscape guidelines and native plant lists shall
include the recommendations of the Town consulting arborist, except that lawn areas shall
Page 14 of 17
not exceed 5,000 square feet. The landscape guidelines are attached as Exhibit C.
Page 15 of 17
Cs
TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE SANTA CLARA COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT:
88. WATER SUPPLY. Two water tanks with a capacity of 10,000 Gallons and one wharf style
hydrant shall be provided unless the proposed public water system can be extended to
provide appropriate lot protection, or other acceptable means of fire protection can provided
as authorized by the Fire Department. Installations shall conform with Fire Department
Standard Details and Specifications W -1.
89. FIRE APPARATUS(ENGINE) ACCESS. Provide access roadways with apaved all weather
surface and a minimum unobstructed width of 20 feet, vertical clearance of 13 feet 6 inches,
minimum circulating turning radius of 36 feet outside and 23 feet inside, and a maximum
slope of 15 %. Installations shall conform with Fire Department Standard Details and
Specifications A -1.
90. FIRE APPARATUS (ENGINE) TURN - AROUND REQUIRED. Provide an approved fire
department engine roadway turnaround with a minimum radius of 3 6 feet outside and 23 feet
inside. Installations shall conform with Fire Department Standard Details and Specifications
A -1. Cul -De -Sac Diameters shall be no less than 64 feet.
91. FIRE APPARATUS (HYDRANT). Where buildings exceed 150 feet travel distance from
the street either an on -.site (private) hydrant or an approved residential fire sprinkler system
shall be provided.
92. PUBLIC FIRE HYDRANT(S) REQUIRED. Provide public fire hydrant(s) at location(s) to
be determined jointly by the Fire Department and the San Jose Water Company. Maximum
hydrant spacing shall be 500 feet, with a minimum single hydrant flow of 1,750 GPM at 20
psi, residual. Consult with San Jose Water Company relative to main sizing requirements
and hydrant spacing. Prior to applying for building permit, provide civil drawings reflecting
all fire hydrants proximal to the site. To prevent building permit delays, the developer shall
pay all required fees to the water company as soon as possible.
93. TIMING OF REQUIRED WATER SUPPLY INSTALLATIONS. Installations of required
fire service(s) and fire hydrants(s) shall be tested and accepted by the Fire Department, prior
to the start of framing or delivery of bulk combustible materials. Building permit issuance
may be delayed until required installations are completed, tested, and accepted.
94. TIMING OF REQUIRED ROADWAY INSTALLATIONS. Required driveways and /or
access roads up through first lift of asphalt shall be inspected and accepted by the Fire
Department prior to the start of construction. Bulk combustible materials shall not be
delivered to the site until installations are completed as stated above. Building permit
issuance may be delayed until installations are completed.
95. FIRE APPARATUS (HYDRANT). Prior to project inspection, the general contractor shall
ensure theat a "Blue" dot has been placed in the roadway as directed by the Fire Department.
96. HOUSE NUMBERS. Approved numbers or addresses shall be placed on all new and
existing buildings in such a position as to be plainly visible and legible from the street or
road fronting the property. Numbers shall contrast with their background.
SECTION VI
This Ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the Town Council of the Town of Los
Page 16 of 17
Gatos on March 4, 2002, and adopted by the following vote as an ordinance of the Town of Los
Gatos at a meeting of the Town Council of the Town of Los Gatos on March 18, 2002 and takes
effect 30 days after it is adopted.
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
AYES: Steven Blanton, Sandy Decker, Steve Glickman, Joe Pirzynski,
Mayor Randy Attaway.
NAYS: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
SIGNED:
MAYOR OF E TOWN OF OS GATOS
LOS GATOS, CALIFORNIA
ATTEST:
1-7
CLERK OF THE TOWN OF LOS GATOS
LOS GATOS, CALIFORNIA
Page 17 of 17
f 'a
yr
HR-5
Prezone
HR-2 1/2
HR-6
Prezone
RC HR-20
Prezone Prezone1
GENERAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN
LANDS OF THE DAGNEY GROUP. LLC
TOWN OF LOS GATOS, CALIFORNIA
SHANNON VALLEY RANCH
BY
GREENBRIAR HOMES COMMUNITIES, INC.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SHEET NO. DESCRIPTION
1. COVER SHEET
2• CONCEPTUAL LAND USE PLAN
3. CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN / CIRCULATION PLAN
4• LEAST RESTRICTIVE DEVELOPMENT AREA
5• CONCEPTUAL GRADING PLAN
6. UTILITY PLAN
7. SITE SECTIONS
S. TREE NOTES
9. SCHEMATIC LANDSCAPE PLAN
RECEVED
JAN - 3 2002
TOWN OF LOS GATOS
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
flEV: PEV: M",
MATCH LINE A 575 -02 -013 umwx w. R0"0 Q
SEE BELOW ` \\
LANDS OF
t Cltt OF SAN JOSE D) a
GuH ° "
EUPIE...
ce E- N '
r °i,.•,'\\ °
20S a3 i
M F,
y cIII SITE
II Y II N ° II 557- 23 -040
LANDS OF CHRISTIAN
CHURCH OF LOS GATOS
8.632 Ac.
VICINITY MAP
567-2 3-a25: / `. O
Az _. .
i `I iii 1- o° U. w] lo ssuE
LEGEN
LANDS OF BUftx:
Ege \\ i u gc+'JJ'
8.441
J F. \ \4 1,
1 \
II. p9QO PROPOSED TOWN ZONING
L,
in ; .
1 11 N ;,
f
1 H
1
H q 0
M QI An CURRENT COUNtt ZONING
II II 11 W ® Y p v - _ _ i `\ I 11 1 ZONING _ W CURRENT TOWN ZONING
N ` 1 1 1 A
TOWN PREZONINC
UCM°..E CBEEN
HR-5 P
BE BE9b1E9 1. EX.l G.
0 PEx vvsaEE, svx[ +xo
O)
SCG4C LM iMN1 EM1S[YEMI
y5Pd / \\ \ Y
r .' :.
J
J,f _ ^` \-
f _ _ \ R
5\\ g \I O xLL9gE PESI]FMULti
AA
1 1
LM }\ \ \\ ApJAVX AESIMfi]IM .xG
PARCEL 47557 -M a] AREAS OF USES:
11.91E STREET. (WITH. NM ECrf 3.1 4
Fow U56] -23 -045 mFN S.
FAZIO
IHCN9 r
j i ___ i \ \\ mrz II I c QW.AY, zszzu1\
2.0971
11' *wa .._I .. \\\ \\\
TxRU qa l1Nlx•]EY •:xesu
wlu 9Twx Lms x s a
fY \ f SUAEIi - - L 1 ' \ \ AREA KBNG GVI fWPE
S
lm B (PUSICt •Y .t
1
1 1 \ \ \ \`• %/ \ \ \ ]
mu OGFN
Ear Plow n mxu u) as.B> u
roru cRss .R
fl \ _ - .vdID6^ Jt.T ..'.... .... =.;a i4 :S •v AfW'CNCG' jF JG
ANT vI L N 1.872 A
LOT AREAS
1 _ _ \\ - R -O -S 6U AM -7
EBr
J 1 - ^' _ I Wr 2 zsfi AcnJ
RVICE
EASEMEMZ_
LI\
527 -56 -011 aii 1
o s xuisOFLEUPPUR11s u.n
r UB n zes 4m
d"V ®2®s d mi a iii i.n:
O \\ 527 -56 -0101
I\ "
Z a ,Iti sett K:..
vVA p26, 3.012 Ac. A/ I /
e ° w Im Es.: Jrn1s
LANDS OF JAHPN
NOTES.
WUQiGE \ \`
537 -17 -011 1.
IIU. OiTIMG
OF
HGME41O
NM ISLIS WGG
K\ 527-56-009 ti L, .. i s. OiSilsec BRITB zwx vnnm I.T . ro BE AEMOEB
2.492 Ac. LA3 DSFACEEPLANDSOFCHITREC
v
v
0 PROJECT INFO
sJSwo:'
m1.
E,
1. 1
v \\ ` ,_ -
i IALCWr GNQNBAWI MEM COYMINI25. MC.
M'ItOPER: 9MN f/JSTAVZO. J:.
1'{
I NO STFNS CNEEN BLW..
11 \\
i
1. -
ASET
E. / (p1J0515E -
Id
a5119
527 -56 -008
1 HR-5 1.672 Ac.
11` I 1 [`
l.
l sE ENOIXFFR
S9Mµ5
iXFJgeGESIZN1LANDSOFCHANGi \ 1 IN slu -afio E
E
wsnxc
use NEEE E .9.wmxm AESIOExcEs 11
11 \ \
tPEE 1 1 A-209 C \ ; - PROF69Ep IR: x — (AW, /
014N
SP/CE 1
1
1 J \\ \ 1 P l
I.. MAY S/i xi951T 1
I 1:1. BEST VMIEY sNNT.M1x ms]nCT 1
j O PoNFA M 1
SYPPLT. TO / SE M, COUPMry fy
1 1 _ p GBIE
iEi£190N: .31. JBI.°]B] -H -PoB k stiJ -L -Oa: I527-56-006 ix, \ t HR -5 pd li o cxoss Pl6A w.sua I\
111 `LANDS 1 OHOLBERi yf
LANDS
OF SEPA SOUR 537-
17-012 p
A-
i
1 ------------------
952
M- 2 y
Dabs -
c. 527-56-00+ F'' ik ] iys level 1v .
1-022 Pc IS \ m4
J;'
Ervr
CONCEPTUAL
LAND USE PLAN E +
LANDSbFSTERANHAs J / 111 /f\ / o ®
o y 7sC
UE:I'.eo. LANDS OF THE DAGNEY GROUP. L.L.C. z
c pBNMZ .. . / MATCH
LINE A ^, ` I8 y _
I __ .._
Jam/ Las uros cnJECRw.'i 5ll -1 -003 5 }] 18 -002 `y
1LAND25.
53± OF
SWEI. LANDS OF MCBETH KSi ° SEEABOVE - 25.
532 Ac. I ['
5.
032 Ac. pA
a
lmB
xIVm & ENe. 3
11
VII 0 S 4I 20a d H 1 i yi . A ° 2®s SHEET 2 OF 9 sw
1us Brave.
1
Iva
r it _
I \i'
x
DEVELOPMENT AREA
LANDS OF THE UAGNEY GROUP, L.L.C.
A TCH LINE a _ .__ _ r t - us tyros
SEE asovE _ •
CJ-
IYu y -
SHEET 4 OF 9
w msc um o, xoe, ,xv
w
NNI
s,mF 10 6 "'N"A DM
In I.
Pc PNNNR xl3ilw_'- _
R4N -" i MROMMATE ENrt MWORK QUANTITIES -^'> \ \ \ ... _ -. - %ossw, INt AOa a
s
zsxv CUT FlLL \
I..,
T
LOTS TOTAL 23627 23827 i \ \ ` 575-02-013
TYPICAL DRIVEWAY SECTION STREET 3071 2305 ' l LANDS
xls) TRAIL 1970 1394 \\\ M_OF -SAR.
So NOISE— IN Kuss vs.., TOTAL 28868
Is Is Nm MWUEa Mu BNIM'CE oN sn ,
2s /
S
A,
D
SITErc "IFNUL
zsx_
iROoAIL —L
EMERGENCY VEHICLE ACCESS ROAD
56- g3 -040
LAND$ OF CHRISTIAN
CHURCH OF L68 GATOF{ :'
1 - 1 \I\ " \\ \ i VICINITY MAP
0,'!y\
NtlN EM D itl iWL ITM@ Y ,
r• _ '
I p. ° 1 \1'
s \, - }
p
aT,
N.KWP ? 8 K8, xo. iE TME: wemr ro-xx /- r $'• \ Ur
Ei Is1MD Rcs.,wD vEC[r .' c 8' e !,
1 7 po o TREE LEGEND
v \ \: \ ! .,
e . _ .I ,! _ aq ;
IB 1 (( dv I iwMr"inzE` R "E — '..1 r:41 i v c 1q 111.S IIIE TO uuNn
F '0 Y T1EE ID BE REIpuEO
A +
t ; as+EGATO r $,A &S rmociss .\ '. _ E / _,. \ ` \'. \: }
EASEMENTExFA [xGENx)4M KGE.
3J't'
l3
ryI
1 8\ }.P , } , } X , '.
1'
Y\ .,.
yp •'..'
r .` ljLRl \:\\ 1 LLS.ESE WED Sa ESCENK C0.v5CRVn110Np
y
F I
1 "1
I
li 1C
sl''.
dq 5p4'. DpxM1EVP Cry aCi I ( q.~ . \S "'/ \ ' S.E. SWaF
w . 1 "rte \ \ 4l. IR151w0 0.M 1 ' w PGR d G[I T nG at[i4 :. ,.'/ \
i
S ,• '!1 ;\ % \\ \ ? \ f.E.E N611L r WN6 SEMU
IS
14 ,
p1
ER
T1 ,
I , / \ ('\ Na
1 \ \ _ .{j H , • -' \ $\ \, D.E %tlVI.2 SiMY oRWI FISflIE 1
RD PI InT /u, l
I } \\,• . / /. : \ . /, ') "
A
r
J , k
v /;
LOi r! wu40B'9 m E i \
l `0 - AI \11F3
s mnN EV'E E
M
ludTivRNA+o xo I
rw + ,
IG \` /
Sb; Jd 4t \ \ w nx'4 c"ip¢'EC°'^'"E — - ' 13 vs.F. sE \ . \ ......
k / ( PRChgf $TsNipA O I \ ''AEt wr gE REpr°p6 1
JS _R \ FlREOEPi TURNWi x _ . "•
ll
1 /6s \
T
D .•
6 \'~ Y". / n I \ 9Db 'DUPN'rICH 5' •WY
1 •\ \ //
nI
M \ , E 5 Sx
p \\ , TRAIL SECTION
GG"
ffAAAA
yMIYp `\\
I _
567-2
11\
L LANDS a O UN
1 i Ay.
R -O -S
l vo' ESCmP ox e.,.. m w`ro w •.EI64NM -T
M1D4RlF \NP 'i ,21
VI ,_ - 1 n,
A
i A < •/
f-J I - c.
s
u 7
1
A /
JI
S OF FEUph ARE, v AdovosM mow P.w w
i
PER
ry, \
I i
fww m.nx /o,. I _
1
vl l
L1 1
ss
CI
iL',. \ \
1 \ •. /
LANDS OF ARAN \\ , . I : _ X \ D'
ya\
z.'!
r .
NO EE ISnNO NIURNSA TO 6E RMOUSxM.
2. PREPLoT MNOOfRol! S RIELLwNY wDAI - \ y
r 537-17-011 "svaFV io cNN16E
A v.Nrx. s
1 527-56-009 z i II x `, A j a usnrw vureRrwN vmm mr e PI M RE,S1 } DS OF FEE I. FASFe,EM.LOdlgxS sx6aM PAE uP xMNres9± Pc q
1
V 4 }µ D PAS SURS= r0 .0.VSwEM nl 1XE
DYE Arv05 Oa CHITRE !.- 11A
P
oa w\ \ 3 I} 'd 34 IOt
Ac. SSRORI PE.wPREPUUmx.
Ys. C rL cRwwc IIORx_uwL AS c°NPI .
x 1 1 A II x R EM1F VNOS OF wwG Nn NNYLTwr c
ENGCO v1A / I d A ' ` ANN10
r ICNRDNKE MM GEOIEMNMK IXoL°
RR110R 2• 6' 1
1 \ p \ \
U $ P GrJRO[
P
r
1 WEROAY PEA e, soxc wEUS sxaL AE UsUN. [O .51 NE,xoorvw CATKIN of qo XG TO ORRRRR RE°VUlS -' POw1A5RlEO
6Y VEE GUTTER DETAIL \. I \ t 7 1 n3 ENCINEEIS SPIT. c1AV vPLUr wnlLR °LSwn. c.0 p°m zcs -
zeo° i V :3TT, ,' a\ N 9 /91. E.N oN xz ro mNU Ron wsMe:r oesER,.TwN
of PE• _ \ Pu wcu .
sNmwNExrs.
q
Y
J" [.slil
1
I Zn • L l i. swx xc NUR rRNLS re BE DnwunM nr m of
Fl.
Is. c/L - 52z j 1 I t
I
HI - -J'' I o[scx co°Imuww° wrx TRE SAR aF Los
tyros PFz —[=E P'S a s.
E 1.6 ., AL YktPWRyIµ4 III II1 C ' g e:.' , ry` \ 1 }'Ij }311
II _ G .INE.T aF PMNS AND
FaRESrm. xo• 10' la 10. LAN'ui 'J CI
4NN \ LOT A PCR CPp E ,l'1 11 1.b Ip' IRNt lllcnYFM NIO EaulM M POINT
ov lF
SuNK[ / I
I
IINIED U E. 1 \ /(gyp ( r
I II'
A r F
O- \ \
1444'...,1
I -
LM
plO51M AND °"So.
CPYpIIEC /MESIMSXru 1 .REPORT D F
1 pp COLREE
EME j}II I'nl - a RNAI. o[
sloil. ho
F;
1 I 1 N •'9. CPp SP.V£ KGS fY ^.tPT L°i A s1W1 6E YVMNMO
6Y cuss 2 KO 66E /
I I i
r/ 1 A _ 1 \II
I
I 7j '
s
O°' i
f ' \V
I
y -. ( mE roYE ox+rtxs ASSOC.nox ixol rx° /°R
NDmoua
I1(
f
j 1
1 _
b I ' t f w PMIERS rRNC sX41 AE .R1.[D 6I ENF xD.A ir. r \ A\
I\I/'/ III I I
y
4 I I • -
S i '\ I II
10,
TRA WIMIN LOr C MLL
BE MNRS
M Bf ME
NAA INTERIOR ROADS - ALTERNATE "A 11. TIE siM S el PII. I OF iNE Ex, S. GROSSxc 1 5z7 % -005 _ $ , 11 APiorwE mrtEa
RNON[
NOrtN wRw nwL °
Enw
Rn (xTSI
a.
F h 73F2 %pc I \ )(I'll (,
l
i r 537 -1] -012
6 R T M RI
RM
lq REN9 WOtOFSEPAHMANSOURRkv. s -W m '
1 11.952 Ac REV.1 m '
y so ?—
szis-
ooa1,"
r ,
l l E' l CONCEPTUAL GRADING PLAN
1 AU
E' ( 3 LANDS OF THE DAGNEY GROUP, L.L.
C. S DF r$TERMKA I
HVIJ o O L @°2 j;
N
1 A \ l ' :
p
VIII /
T
I I
1 / /
U L/ \ . LM
urDS
yy GWfORnu
J S' s'..
ses[/ F M AMM
UM INTERIOR ROADS - ALTERNATE "
B" -- - \ 1 1
s r / P
I
t *. i I ® avlLfw.Nueews. INC. sceASl -
eo• Ixrsl - L%iAl0S OFUS fz
E /' /. N/ '` \ ! g'I I I ! {AMPS OFBiAIOBEI{ F lA
xoM
vN
IsI& 2531b .AH.':. . \ .:.n' l 5.03E Ar// _.,' / / .. ."SA EET 5 OF
575-02-013
I
LANDS 4F
CITY 0 —W JOSE z 3 §
II.!) cSITE
NT\ \r =
w
56] 23 040
LANDS OF CHRISTIAN a/
DH oos ? VICINITY MAPcHHfLospnr
REW .aUSr ENr m Tee {
RE REOUPm W irAi•.wu m /Y'
L
NpS {>R 6}1{tN
SE R
l
LJ
4n 35FI
L
I, 1 ^. ".`. _ r I.; \11 \ \1 \2 m
r /
l / w3me v E r. cusroN o f
3 l EASEMENT ND
VEIJEC a ROwxv Ass IFFEE 5 r ' '.`L \ 1 I
I, - \
1'! \ 09.5<.E9 CxG[ONSSEM MNi4t11 ` -
11111 \4' "zo[ wBJEE Co""EiEDwvN - J
III FR" E.sE4Ex15 eErwax Lm it .- \ s.E. sLaRE
14 µD E' IDRMMpT0 PUb.K W1RnR,'
sENER 3 4
1
I.
Lro
DR
Q'x r ° a eURRE I 'Ri ^ 1\ .c weuc
muLs IPR DEb i 2srSsNwMlac
s : ^
g1 \
v. 1 / APPRO%IAMTE LOCAMkE OF
SHE ^ \ \
q1 \
I AfiCe1 M P , JOINT"TAENCd HAS BEEN 6H0 , 3 R E y[A 11 I
A P ft 4
1 _ /.' EXACT OON OF JOINT NCN .'/ /
W t
1 7 TO
BE
6E E5 HOED BY .L,
N \
PROVIDE T
7,
1FIR O§TH2''' •IFIRE`DEPi.-:IiM1OUi .- .. II
v \•!
l \.
1`
1 E,
I
Iv l
v E Jr —
rI F
1 \ \
AaQIwN \ - ...WATER NE HAS BEEn
sn0wrv. .
1
ILR
y r E
rauL
iG - __- -__r 567-
24' APPROIIIqATE LOCAl10N OF THE
1'
lv 0 1 1 G,ILANDS OF A JOUM(
I Q -
1 ' iR.ut jry, pl A : LINE ITO BE0 9kNE0 %By SANAJOS _ II} 1 a/a
1 X/ \'\ \\ WATfR. COMPANY ^ l
I R-0-5 641 M
7
i TREET
IGNi
P
LEGEN
FOR. oRNx .
NxDLE t V'! v — PRavosm smnu
cew UBk J Lt 9 d4 >? i`T' — PRaosm N.o owETjCFLEJPt
B` - /
L
J
L
I ;b., . '(\
F
X\
A'
y\
Oy,
pv2v
y
d
v
vv
I
vv
v
l 527; 56'0! 0 _ _
III
A
J II'
I //
m
Uouw
RNET 3.01i
Ac oaEO..' SE
R 4NOS OF
JAPAN
NOTES oxulucE
FF wuE
A AND wLDwcs rD BE
DEOSXED
of 1 i• \ %r III X \ \ "^
spry 3. giEPLmIME Or RRWM IS MWIRN RT
µD 527-55-06J / .\ ` \ ` „ lr I!1DSo-OF FEE %s'Oo''cror.I -El — mrwx Lon.Ano BE
Irtuwro 1.2 49i 4a \\
1 \ \ 1 \ V _ o ME SUWM tD MARSIFEW Xr THE
ENE R. ENEM LDCUIws I.. µE ANRD%x.
T J 1 ' . or RsROrc.IE , w.w PREPeD.
nox. 1 \ I 1 \ E% .
EULVERT A AA ) t I'r ` 'CROSSING s. cwgND wcRr swu BE m ""FnT6REMAIN !E.rAWwCE mM'cmrzaw uL
FlNnMmx a FR. uIO XwuFOW 9x ENDED
c..
EVES /IV /
9e. l 1 6- Eb5TX4 NELLS ENRE BE 4NMNNEO OR RMISMDIIICI1'Q \ - /' I I I I -.. rnva9 ro o ROF REgR E ro HRRE aEo
er
J Ewer, wufl' IrnrFrt D51Rx'f. cru (wel :55
xew ME`5 L rsaeirvo AFRAH E MR oman OONDR llax
ar 1 \ 1
1 ` _ % 52]56 -006 I1 I II i I I
i _y T !
T. W F
RO .0 SRREER
s
M
DE
REOal¢IEn
E
Ly7r REwxsvum rnwn ro ssuwcE or 1
vcam¢
r
E9NFHA^ o \ 1' \ V:, I I I I HONES . BE caxsiRUCIFD wlTl RRE
IIPRAFRARI v I _ ___
1 I -A LANDS 01 y . 1 I
I
Il/
I III _ el 1 ! I tI i i , ' ouior oi[
tiuo,
xiE vx.n on .DCOMaxrROneormol
1 le I j':I -(.0 ARE W m): ) swlA
ROS.
u,
Xro.E1
a" xmlX
Pe
Io alawm
d NODE ORROX CF It µD ..E. DY r1E
ryM4
e 537- .17 -012 REV 9 DS D,
y# LANDS OF SEPAHMANSOUR RM i 12-01
8 1 I CONCEPTUAL UG'UTILITY
PLAN 027 56
004
AI_ 1II I I'. n 1
F I I LANDS OF THE DAGNEY GROUP,
LLC YS c I .111 I I
dI / -
L F Is E A RA it 1 "
f Los Gras
cwroRxu Ii EACH $
sonrs i
t . \ `. • - CINw.bN. umN+wEsM..Swu'
INC.
i O'FE/VCU2 &
Tl 50i£ A ' / 8}4EET 6 OF
9
a 0! ° °
m°
u
4,4
E'w 1.00 2.40 »W 4.00 5.W 6.0]
SITE SECTION C -C
SITE SECTION B -B
s
4__
L
EXISTING DRIVE WAY OF LOT 14
w
SEC a — a
KEY MAP - NOT TO SCALE
SITE SECTION A - A
o a4 ®a
scutY -ao•
SHEET 7 OF 9
SITE SECTIONS
LANDS OF DAGENEY GROUP, L.L.C.
om mimm I 0wi 0m01 NoIX
E'w 1.00 2.40 »W 4.00 5.W 6.0]
SITE SECTION C -C
SITE SECTION B -B
s
4__
L
EXISTING DRIVE WAY OF LOT 14
w
SEC a — a
KEY MAP - NOT TO SCALE
SITE SECTION A -A
o a4 ®a
scutY -ao•
SHEET 7 OF 9
SITE SECTIONS
LANDS OF DAGENEY GROUP, L.L.C.
I1
i r
1
1
1
1
1
Ir -'
I1
1
L
IL
L
LOT A
M.) 4s
6
YI
s
6,
LOT B04S
Aq
tl
0
4
9
3
19
b
11
E
11
i/
13
LOT C
6.S I[S
9
RB55W XxL rab
VICINITY MAP
Mtt 10 $LVE
NOTES: P E.. BUDWBB ro BE aEx01KXE0.
z. PREPLOIONL m MOWS a PRf11xuW(t 4q
SCFlSIIXBSnNG ro cX41DF. HRR IOHIf MMW LOi P M BE REtlWEO
E11511N0 PRWgYE iMYt Ntllxx LOi > 10 BE ..D
5.
DESroBSIICx. w°<
oDnB
NPaIaxBE+MOBBME IxmEMBlaor i4 OF
IDSm
Ob/RINEXI Or PNd6 NN MXESIBI.
1. 11X4. 1RM M AWEM WO LOUIICN Cr PoIM OF
BEMB 10 .1DlILEBT PROPFAIY IO lxE M51 9W1
BE CflE1XlMD W CWRpe1Xi10.Y NttX ME tOxX OF l0B Gi05
iRNLS nX0 @xEwnn mxxlRE[ PP 1x I.. Or W. DESwx.
i. OPFx SPKE 116 S. E10EPE Wi B . BE ..m B!
1. wuE maa1. S assO u BE u(nmOw) Dr xm0 / Om x..l l
B. E.Nk mMW LOT C MM BE NNNFNNEO By 1XE X.9A
y
0 w Bo EO
sufE:l • -aD k
ai'. B -ii ni i
CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN
CIRCULATION PLAN a
LANDS OF THE DAGNEY GROUP, LLC. _
n[ciPPe[4 fwsEYfMS BLiwE[N LOi ,x
WO 4x05 Oi BVPxE WEX i ON LOt
SIN`
x0 ORNEWxv ON 4Y'JS EFOr B. BU E SS P[ R3 /0ED rOP EuEPGFNEV vF it1E KCL55
L
PUPPOSEC
I
1
I1
i r
1
1
1
1
1
Ir -'
I 1
1
L
IL
L
LOT A
M.) 4s
6
YI
s
6,
LOT B04S
Aq
tl
0
4
9
3
19
b
11
E
11
i/
13
LOT C
6.S I[S
9
RB55W XxL rab
VICINITY MAP
Mtt 10 $LVE
NOTES: P E.. BUDWBB ro BE aEx01KXE0.
z. PREPLOIONL m MOWS a PRf11xuW(t 4q
S CFlSIIXBSnNG ro cX41DF. HRR IOHIf MMW LOi P M BE REtlWEO
E11511N0 PRWgYE iMYt Ntllxx LOi > 10 BE ..D
5.
DESroBSIICx. w°<
oDnB
NPaIaxBE+MOBBME IxmEMBlaor i4 OF
IDSm
Ob/RINEXI Or PNd6 NN MXESIBI.
1. 11X4. 1RM M AWEM WO LOUIICN Cr PoIM OF
BEMB 10 .1DlILEBT PROPFAIY IO lxE M51 9W1
BE CflE1XlMD W CWRpe1Xi10.Y NttX ME tOxX OF l0B Gi05
iRNLS nX0 @xEwnn mxxlRE[ PP 1x I.. Or W. DESwx.
i. OPFx SPKE 116 S. E10EPE Wi B . BE ..m B!
1. wuE m aa1. S assO u BE u(nmOw) Dr xm0 / Om x..l l
B. E.Nk mMW LOT C MM BE NNNFNNEO By 1XE X.9A
y
0 w Bo EO
sufE:l • -aD k
ai'. B -ii ni i
CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN
CIRCULATION PLAN a
LANDS OF THE DAGNEY GROUP, LLC. _
n[ciPPe[4 fwsEYfMS BLiwE[N LOi ,x
WO 4x05 Oi BVPxE WEX i ON LOt
SIN`
x0 ORNEWxv ON 4Y'JS EFOr B. BU E SS P[ R3 /0ED rOP EuEPGFNEV vF it1E KCL55
PUPPOSEC
I `
14
I1
i r
1
1
1
1
1
Ir -'
I1
1
L
IL
L
LOT A
M.) 4s
6
YI
s
6,
LOT B04S
Aq
tl
0
4
9
3
19
b
11
E
11
i/
13
LOT C
6.S I[S
9
RB55W XxL rab
VICINITY MAP
Mtt 10 $LVE
NOTES: P E.. BUDWBB ro BE aEx01KXE0.
z. PREPLOIONL m MOWS a PRf11xuW(t 4q
SCFlSIIXBSnNG ro cX41DF. HRR IOHIf MMW LOi P M BE REtlWEO
E11511N0 PRWgYE iMYt Ntllxx LOi > 10 BE ..D
5.
DESroBSIICx. w°<
oDnB
NPaIaxBE+MOBBME IxmEMBlaor i4 OF
IDSm
Ob/RINEXI Or PNd6 NN MXESIBI.
1. 11X4. 1RM M AWEM WO LOUIICN Cr PoIM OF
BEMB 10 .1DlILEBT PROPFAIY IO lxE M51 9W1
BE CflE1XlMD W CWRpe1Xi10.Y NttX ME tOxX OF l0B Gi05
iRNLS nX0 @xEwnn mxxlRE[ PP 1x I.. Or W. DESwx.
i. OPFx SPKE 116 S. E10EPE Wi B . BE ..m B!
1. wuE maa1. S assOu BE u(nmOw) Drxm0 / Om x..l l
B. E.Nk mMW LOT C MM BE NNNFNNEO By 1XE X.9A
y
0 w Bo EO
sufE:l • -aD k
ai'. B -ii ni i
CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN
CIRCULATION PLAN a
LANDS OF THE DAGNEY GROUP, LLC. _
If
I
I
14
Op kee
N1
1M__ L
I ` , I
e" J y
II
Legend
r,
24" Box Tress In InfOrz"'C"'t')
z
Tree Mart" h Rip,
W'.tlan Arad.
CID 'z
ca
L
E.I.tirs Trees to Remain
CID
ca
3 Roll Pon..
cn_
Open Kro F.nl.
Tree Palette
Lagarstroamia x fouriel Crops S4jrtle
Fists.]. 'Kin.nes, aln.se Pl.t..h.
so
Tipali.
1/
011ay Oak I
0'... . lat'at. Coast Live Oak
Sequoia ..Mp ... Iran$ Coast Redwood
Tree Palette
cormyq spa. Dag ... al va'l.ti.s
F.P.I., F .n,ortll Fr.nnsrt Cottonwood
Ouar.. agqlif.11. Coast Live Oak
Sall. W.I.I.Pis Arr.p Hills.
Midivriserrg
Note:
open Kra Fr.0 will to located Individually
on each lot based on the final house
FM Cls le.,stlor, Fine I ... tion. .111 be
daterinlited at a later date.
Op kee
N1
1 M__ L
I ` , I
e" J y
II
z
CID 'z
ca
L
CID
ca
cn_
0 40 80 so
L1.0
TREE LIST
ildi REtl6 1RUxx ILGMx PIgFO5D1 CODUfNf
xe. ouxnm w:nox
TREE UST
m¢ SP MOis =sFOx PROPO wilssM
xe. Osss m ecnOx
F,,, —..
Prmw,
P.—
n ,^mq. w nw r,awm, nmmr
m ,wrye a .11y rmvn., mmm.ueb rmWN, ntxeu n .a
orrrrorrrr mr wa.
Filltl
itilli—
Fit—
eem
r. P rr r nrmn.
prww
TREE Summ,"IRY
aWFpItWAW NWRER OF OFOES ON ]NE pROFE , 9] 0
1. NUNFER OR iREES SOFYEYE 53
It— ww is.. Ci JFEES ]O BE RE,MKO'. SO
mmroAv F WPRO %INAK NUY$A O! TREES TO OE PRMEFvE FIL
sit
is
ww,l
l< 3r,tt, m,mry
Is. m weWm•... •w. ss
13
am tl M
is Z- w.a
r
u+
1. Fuy um. Oarpn 0.M L
qm I. N
m Y
W m s
gn N
Wxm rya I13..
bmn Q1.43)A11 mr lwi
wrs. earn
Y vub
mew
33 Ym eew
fwm flmreF Wil xW Mw
fJ Y vqh w W2 Rw'
is mq M ynr
Jmenrr Nn qnr
M 9.443,!
3) ill, 35)0., 9,n a Mm
YP. prrm. µ,
4. 11 till. A ?1.6.
40
w w
4Al!
WM W w e'
noWwaW.wa oM 4,4n.9 u
FM vM0
m. Mnw nxr sen 11 Ili 11
t.
AJ,
pe 51 O'
lit is L.NR+ IL14M,9.J.] n nV.N
gyp.
OS 11
cNOlsi,x wis fv.
11 PmJ eirvw N.101a.9Aa J9e fmn i3.0i 0.
9 Aemm y Po '
non
wow NR.. bu wM
wu rq.w Wsv w.a
w Is F—1 A} µn 1
A 6.SJ M] wb ^
m Q??eS3A3 p3
fmn Newry 31 xY Cm.
1 r
w a.)
ends! 71 44.
M _ is
w w.a w s its "
s" it, It— ill wb
m w,a is b
m WY Fiw a MbH 11
A u, 24 w s 117 wnJ m.
33 Wpm Nn Fit ItL Aew.
e wWww
m mI m m15 F. w
x1 visa mi ! Imw•. 1 wu.J
w
P DIswsw
n Imm
r Wb 9wf ll3 wq ea 11 Lit
A
wm aM r4.. F—I, lX w.ym
ls Ill Otlo m st, m> s 14144Nwe.y n
urs
Pis'e..M.. 335 wewebLY3anonhnnmuk .Inawn m Wn r
e aw m> Y
wb®
wee 1am. .. zz ais.J
ea J.ss Wrom a. +...ni :moronnryR.
Its ma
w 17 m t010 SAlitCW
W wA. M b <mn fn
we 6Y, w1 M Mn pn
me bo NRn mr o c ex N
W Cnn [v.
ma we J) m o—N a..
a n) emM nr n [n
r 1. m15 Rwnr a. reav,N m mn
pfnewr, wG
r
mwry ewIF
v iswea
www v w
F. fM. 0. Mt, s
vua 113 Crop en
we
11r333 U6
w wN ^+ v9J CN
e) s w.aw 3410 1Y
SLIM3
3sa1. O's, exI.. z.. . Il.laxLiu(.0 U
e
Ill x+ N
Ul a.
a.
mMw wr: I zxn.
n wn wv /
n l 11 b —ite, n
1 vw /w r u
en 1}6 f4en —I wub .w.mry N Bu. eea
i41f I,Y [ o,.ab
NMUr. Ni J., urmmry I Bin
it 133 ew /v mueWn J} wb o
is 133 M 9.m rob Nrwnn JS
iw wP^ A m .W m w inn w w
ea 0u nee. Wn.uwly. 313 M
w111mwcnwb .mslur. i7
M Mvn nerv, 1 I.
N ly W w n
Is l. w/n uMUn 3Fit
Is Iw 'tis rwisJr r)).3] I,- am] Mnrn aw rr.n ervy wMUn w
en
F,,, —..
Prmw,
P.— n ,^mq. w nw r,awm,
nmmr m ,wrye a .11y rmvn., mm m.ueb rmWN, ntxeu n .
a orrrrorrrr mr
wa.
Filltl
itilli—
Fit—
eem r. P rr r
nrmn.
prww REV 49 -05 -
OI RflI: QS -OI -
OIRI
R R..nm
Rn SHEET 8 OF
9 — TREE
NOTES LANDS OF THE DAGNEY GROUP, L.L.
C. TREE Summ,"
IRY aWFpItWAW NWRER OF OFOES ON ]NE pROFE , 9]
0 1. NUNFER OR iREES SOFYEYE
53 It— ww is.. Ci JFEES ]O BE RE,MKO'.
SOmmroAv F WPRO %INAK NUY$A O! TREES TO OE PRMEFvE
FIL REV 49 -05 -
OI RflI: QS -OI -
OIRI
R R..nm
Rn SHEET 8 OF
9 — TREE
NOTES LANDS OF THE DAGNEY GROUP, L. L.
PROPOSED LANDSCAPE GUIDELINES
FOR
SHANNON VALLEY RANCH
1. Use native plants, particularly along property boundaries or in corridors viewed from nearby
properties. Select trees from the Town's List of Approved Trees and shrubs and ground
cover from the Suggested and Supplemental native plant lists attached.
2. Use the landscape plan to address the particular needs of the property such as controlling
erosion, providing privacy, creating shade, and softening or mitigating the appearance of
structures.
3. Create a SIMPLE and elegant planting scheme that is not elaborate.
4. Make use of existing plant material, especially indigenous grasses, chaparral and oaks. Do
not replace with incompatible plant materials. Refer to the Town's List of Approved Trees
and the attached Suggested and Supplemental plant lists.
5. Plant in random groupings (cluster planting) rather than in linear form. Allow plants and
shrubs to appear to flow across property lines. Avoid a cultivated, formal appearance.
6. Whenever possible leave large areas in grasses and other indigenous plants.
7. Use appropriate plant material in each location such as Alders and Redwoods in damp,
shady locations and Oaks in dry, open areas.
8. Consider the future height of trees and shrubs such that major views on -and off -site will not
become obstructed.
9. Avoid the introduction of non - indigenous trees that would dramatically alter the character of
the landscape.
10. Planting or building of any types of structures within trail easements or conservation
easements is prohibited.
11. Adjacent to street rights -of -way or trail easements avoid plantings that would restrict sight
distance, require unusual maintenance to keep easements open, or interfere with already
established indigenous plantings.
12. Utilize drip or bubbler irrigation to establish plantings. Minimize the use of spray irrigation.
13. Spray irrigation may be used to water lawn areas and to assist in fire suppression adjacent
and /or near structures.
14. Lawns shall be limited to 10% of a lot's area and shall be drought tolerant.
15. Fencing is not allowed at property lines. Any new or replacement fences shall be open and
rural, such as a wood, a wood -look polymer, or a concrete 3 or 4 -rail fence, with or without
wire mesh backing. Any wire mesh should be of a color that blends into the background and
not white.
16. The use of uplighting is prohibited.
17. Fountains and statues are prohibited in front yard spaces.
EXV1lb(e C
The first section of this list describes trees, shrubs, and ground covers which are indigenous to —
or living naturally in — Los Gatos. Therefore, not only for their beauty and contribution to the rural
aspect of the valley, but also because they are plants most likely to thrive with the least care, they
are highly recommended choices for use here.
A supplemental list follows the first and contains plants which, while not indigenous to Los Gatos,
are native to other parts of California and will perform well here.
NATIVE TREES
COAST LIVE OAK Quercus agrifolia
BLACK OAK Quercus kelloggii
VALLEY OAK Quercus Lobata
COAST REDWOOD Sequoia sempenrirens, including cultivars
DOUGLAS FIR Pseudotsuga menziesii
CALIFORNIA BAY LAUREL Umbellularia californica
BIG LEAF MAPLE Acermacrophyllum
MADRONE Arbutus menziesii
ISLAY OR WILD CHERRY Prunus ilifolia
CALIFORNIA BUCKEYE Aesculus californica
NATIVE SHRUBS
MANZANTA Arctostaphylos ssp., including hybrids
CALIFORNIA WILD LILAC Ceanothus ssp., including hybrids
COMMON FLANNEL BUSH Fremontodendro californicum
SILK TASSEL BUSH Garrya elliptica
TOYON, CHRISTMAS BERRY Heteromeles arbutifolia
COFFEEBERRY Rhamnus californica
NATIVE GROUND COVERS
CALIFORNIA WILD LILAC Ceanothus, low growing species
MANZATTA Arctostaphylos, low growing species
DWARF COYOTE BUSH Baccharis pilularis pilularis
NATIVE GRASSES Meadow Fescues — Bromes, Oats, Rye
SUPPLEMENTAL PLANT LIST
CALIFORNIA NATURALIZED
TREES
WHITE ALDER
WESTERN DOGWOOD, PACIFIC DOGWOOD
TANBARK, OR TAN OAK
BISHOP PINE
CALIFORNIA SYCAMORE
CANYON LIVE OAK
BLUE OAK
SHRUBS
CHAMISE
COAST OR CALIFORNIA SAGEBRUSH
SPICE BUSH
BUSH ANEMONE
WESTERN REDBUD
SUMMER HOLLY
CALIFORNIA HAZELNUT
ISLAND BUSH POPPY
BUSH POPPY
CALIFORNIA BUCKWHEAT
ST. CATHERINE'S LACE
FLANNEL BUSH
ISLAND SNAPDRAGON
CREAM BUSH
WHITE PITCHER SAGE
OREGON GRAPE
CALIFORNIA HOLLY GRAPE
BUSH MONKEY FLOWER
PLUMAS MONKEY FLOWER
PACIFIC WAX MYRTLE
LEATHER OAK
REDBERRY
COAST RHODODENDRON
LEMONADE BERRY
SUGARBUSH
ANY CALIFORNIA CURRANT OR GOOSEBERRY
MATILIJA POPPY
CALIFORNIA WILD ROSE
EVERGREEN HUCKLEBERRY
Alnus rhombifolia
Corpus nuttallii
Lithocarpus densiflorus
Pinus muricata
Platanus racemosa
Quercus chrysolepis
Quercus douglasii
Adenostoma fasciculatum
Artemisia californica
Calycanthus occidentalis
Carpenteria californica
Cercis occidentalis
Comarostaphylis diversifolia var. Planifolia
Corylus cornuta variety californica
Dendromecon harfordii
Dendromecon rigida
Eriogonum fasciculatum
Eriogonum giganleum
Fremontodendron — any are fine
Galvesia speciosa
Holodiscus discolor
Lepechinia calycina
Mahonia aquifolium
Mahonia pinata
Mimulus aurantiacus
Mimulus bifidus
Myrica californica
Quercus durata
Rhamnus crocea
Rhododendron occidentale
Rhus integrifolia
Rhus ovate
Ribes or Grossularia
Romneya coulteri
Rosa californica
Vaccinium ovatum
N
ONy
OJtU
GRdC
OCC
NLNd
y
N
daQav00. Q3
Oh
o
mE
v
v
v
v
v
v
v
g
N
d
G
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
N
ry
G
N
N@
N
N
N
N
N
N
C
C
Y
Y
m
7
J
J
J
7
m
J
J
Y
Y
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
V)
O
O
J
J
J
J
J
C
J
J
J
O
O
G
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C . .
0
0
A
mu
A
P'
C
C
N
N
7 >>
7
J
J
7
j
0
N
N
m
m
m
m
w
m
m
m
m
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
Laof -
Nm
a
mmnmm°
E
0x
2
5
U
m "'°
Z
Ja
Cd'
W
3
31wi
O
w
cn "
e
This Page
Intentionally
Left Blank
ATTACHMENT 4
This Page
Intentionally
Left Blank
ATTACHMENT 5
This Page
Intentionally
Left Blank
ATTACHMENT 6
ATTACHMENT 7
THIS PROPERTY
3862 SF 5720 SF 6441 SF
4390 SF
5239 SF
5542 SF
4328 SF
4766 SF
5800 SF
10801 SF 4644 SF
4722 SF
4502 SF
4704 SF
5265 SF 4692 SF
4699 SF
6163 SF
4310 SF
4592 SF 4908 SF
4658 SF
4612 SF
4706 SF
4612 SF
4302 SF
NOTE:
(1)UNIT OF HOUSE AREA: SF = SQUARE FEET;
(2)THE DATA FROM ZILLOW.COM.
ATTACHMENT-1 HOUSE SIZES NEAR TO THIS PROPERTY
HOUSE LOCATION
ATTACHMENT-2 BUILDABLE AREA AND HOUSE LOCATION
BUILDABLE AREA:
±75,000 SF
From: >
Sent: Tuesday, May 3, 2022 4:08 PM
To: Planning Comment <PlanningComment@losgatosca.gov>
Cc: tim <t >
Subject: Comments on 300 Mountain Laurel Ln Plans
EXTERNAL SENDER
Hi Los Gatos Planning,
This email is in response to the solicited comments for 300 Mountain Laurel Ln plans.
The following are my comments specifically regarding the “Letter of Justification” for a 6000 sq ft house
for 300 Mountain Laurel Ln.:
The target property 300 Mountain Laurel Ln is in the Shannon Valley Ranch neighborhood (SVR).
The “Letter of Justification” is disingenuous because it compares houses NOT in the SVR neighborhood.
The houses in SVR range in size from 4300 to 4800 sq ft (not including any after built additions or
outbuildings) according to the original plans.
I recommend the “Letter of Justification” be rewritten to be accurate for the SVR neighborhood and
resubmitted to planning. This would give the proper context for people to base their comments.
Note that I am not against a 6000 sq ft house, only that the planning materials should reflect the
situation correctly and factually.
Thank you and regards,
Tim Kinslow
ATTACHMENT 8
This Page
Intentionally
Left Blank