08 Staff Report - Los Gatos Boulevard Plan and Design StandardsDate: August 6, 1997
REPORT TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
FINDINGS:
ACTION:
ENVIRONMENTAL
ASSESSMENT:
EXHIBITS:
For Agenda Of: August 13, 1997
Agenda Item: 8
The Planning Commission
The General Plan Committee and Architectural Standards/ Hillside Committee
Los Gatos Boulevard Plan and Design Standards
Negative Declaration ND-96-21
Consider the recommendations of the General Plan Committee and Architectural
Standards Committee for the Los Gatos Boulevard Plan and Design Standards,
and make a recommendation to the Town Council. A negative declaration has
been prepared for the Los Gatos Boulevard Plan and an Environmental Impact
Report will not be required.
INITIATED BY: Town of Los Gatos
None required.
Recommendation to Town Council.
It has been determined that this project will not have a significant impact on the
environment and a Negative Declaration has been prepared.
A. Los Gatos Boulevard Plan, dated Fall 1997
B. Los Gatos Boulevard Design Standards, dated Fall 1997
C. Resolution 1995-9, Establishing the Interim Policies for Development
Applications along Los Gatos Boulevard
D. Resolution 1995-88, Establishing the Mission, Goals and Objectives of the
Los Gatos Boulevard Plan
E. Resolution 1995-105, Amending the Interim Policies for Development
Applications along Los Gatos Boulevard
F. Los Gatos Boulevard Plan Focused Traffic Evaluation, received December
24, 1996
G. Los Gatos Boulevard Plan Initial Study, received January 31, 1997
H. Negative Declaration, received January 31, 1997
I. Notice for May 28, 1996 public meeting to review Plan and Design
Standards
J. Public comments from May 28, 1996 public meeting
K. Notice for June 18, 1997 public meeting to review Plan and Design
Standards
L. Public comments from June 18, 1997 public meeting
M. Los Gatos Weekly Times article about Michael Freedman forum,
November 2, 1994
N. Los Gatos Weekly Times editorial about Boulevard Charrette, November
30, 1994
O. Letter from resident Larry Paulding, received August 4, 1997
RECOMMENDATION
SUMMARY: Recommendation to Town Council for adoption.
ATTACHMENT 2
The Planning Commission - Page 2
Los Gatos Boulevard Plan and Design Standards - ND-96-21
August 13, 1997
A. BACKGROUND:
The genesis of the Los Gatos Boulevard Plan and Design Standards occurred three years ago when the Town
Council authorized staff to hold an all day design Charrette in November 1994. The Town held a prelude to
the Charrette in October 1994 with a visit from well known architect and urban planner Michael Freedman.
Both events spawned an interest in the long term development and improvement of private property and public
right of way on Los Gatos Boulevard.
The timeline and brief summary of events provided below outlines the development of the Draft Los Gatos
Boulevard Plan and Design Standards (Exhibits A and B):
October 1994
November 1994
Michael Freedman presented his ideas and visions for long term improvement plans.
He lectured about the potential for wide roads such as the Boulevard and associated
design challenges. Nearly 200 people attended the public forum where a "Vision" for the
Boulevard was first discussed (Exhibit M).
The Town and the Santa Clara Valley Chapter of the American Institute for Architects
(ALA) sponsored the all day Charrette. "Charrette" comes from the French word for cart,
coined when design students would frantically work as a cart came by and hastily
collected their sketches. The Boulevard Charrette was an intensive, collaborative design
effort that included Architects, residents, commercial property owners, business owners/
managers, students, and Town Council members, Commissioners and Committee
members. Approximately 125 participants broke into nine teams that put together nine
unique visions for the Boulevard (Exhibit N).
January 1995 Town Council adopted Resolution 1995-9 establishing interim policies for development
applications along Los Gatos Boulevard from Spencer Avenue to Route 85 Exhibit C).
The policies required applicants to review proceedings of the Charrette and include a
written description of how the project addressed issues outlined during the Charrette.
February 1995 A third public forum entitled "Share the Vision", was held to revisit the visions that were
created at the Charrette. The team leaders from the Charrette presented their visions
and a pan& of community representatives addressed questions from the audience.
Approximately 150 people attended the forum.
April 1995 A report entitled "A Vision for Los Gatos Boulevard" was prepared by consultant Lisa
Kleissner and staff. This report includes the visions and graphics prepared by all nine
Charrette teams. It also includes an appendix with news clippings and miscellaneous
correspondence concerning the Los Gatos Boulevard Plan. The General Plan
Committee often used the report as a reference for maintaining the visions from the
Charrette in the Boulevard Plan.
June 1995
August 1995
Town Council adopted Resolution 1995-88 establishing the Mission, Goals and
Objectives of the Los Gatos Boulevard Plan (Exhibit D). The Resolution was based on
visions from the Charrette and provided policy direction to the General Plan Committee
and Architectural Standards Committee for preparing the Plan and Design Standards,
respectively.
Town Council adopted Resolution 1995-105 (Exhibit E) amending the interim policies for
development along Los Gatos Boulevard from Spencer Avenue to Route 85 and thereby
rescinding Resolution 1995-9. The new policy included the requirement for applicants
to review the "Vision for Los Gatos Boulevard" report.
The Planning Commission age 3
Los Gatos Boulevard Plan and Design Standards - ND-96-21
August 13, 1997
May1995 thru
August 1997
May 1996
The General Plan and Architectural Standards Committees worked with staff and the
public to prepare the Boulevard Plan and Design Standards. Each Committee met once
a month with a focus on developing policy and implementation measures for Los Gatos
Boulevard. Each meeting was open to the public and held in the Council Chambers.
Joint General Plan and Architectural Standards meeting held in the Neighborhood Center
for public review of the Draft Boulevard Plan and Design Standards. Public comments
were recorded and considered at subsequent meetings.
December 1996 Traffic Evaluation for the Boulevard Plan completed by Wilidan Associates (Exhibit F).
January 1997
February 1997
June 1997
An Initial Study and Negative Declaration for the Boulevard Plan was prepared by Geier
and Geier Associates (Exhibits G and H).
Town Council approved an agreement with landscape architect Paul Rodrigues to
prepare graphics for the Draft Boulevard Plan and Design Standards.
Joint General Plan and Architectural Standards Committee meeting held in the Town
Council Chambers for public review of the Final Draft Boulevard Plan and Design
Standards. The presentation included graphics prepared by Paul Rodrigues.
B. FORMAL PUBLIC REVIEW:
Two formal public meetings were held to review the Draft Boulevard Plan and Design Standards; one
on May 28, 1996 and one on June 18, 1997. Upon completing the first Draft of the Boulevard Plan and
Design Standards, staff noticed Los Gatos Boulevard property owners, businesses and nearby residents
of the May 28, 1996 meeting (Exhibit I). The notice list includes 832 recipients.
Approximately 40 people attended the May 28, 1996 meeting. The people present were mostly
residents living either on or near the Boulevard. Business representatives including auto dealership
owners were also present. General Plan Committee members presented the Draft Plan and
Architectural Standards Committee members presented the Draft Design Standards. Many people in
the audience suggested that graphics would help convey the intent of the two documents. Confusion
about the public improvement policies was apparent; mainly concerning re -configuration of travel lanes,
on -street parking and accessibility to businesses. The public also stated that they did not want the
Boulevard to become another "downtown" and that residential property near the Boulevard should be
protected from development impacts. A public comment summary is attached as Exhibit J.
After the May 1996 meeting, the need for graphics in the Plan and Design Standards became a major
point of discussion. The General Plan Committee also realized that a traffic evaluation was needed to
evaluate the impacts of the Draft Boulevard Plan. The Council authorized the General Plan Committee's
request for funding the design graphics and the traffic evaluation. Based on the recommendations of
the traffic evaluation, changes were made to the Draft Plan. For example, elimination of free right turns
was no longer proposed "where feasible". Only the right turns at Blossom Hill Road and Los Gatos
Boulevard would be modified. In addition, considerable study was undertaken concerning transition
areas where the Boulevard reduces through lanes in the southbound direction between Mitchell and
Spencer Avenue.
The General Plan and Architectural Standards Committees worked for about one year on Boulevard
Plan and Standards revisions and preparation of graphics before they held the second public meeting
on June 18, 1997. Again, 832 notices were sent to people on or near the Boulevard (Exhibit K).
Approximately 35 people attended the evening meeting. A mix of residents, commercial property
owners, business representatives and auto dealers were present. The Committees presented the Draft
Plan and the Draft Design Standards with graphics. Copies of both documents were given to the public.
Staff presented implementation and funding information. Many answers to the questions posed at the
The Planning Commission - F,.ae 4
Los Gatos Boulevard Plan and Design Standards - ND-96-21
August 13, 1997
May 1996 public review were provided. The public comments are summarized in Exhibit L.
Larry Paulding, a dedicated resident involved in the Boulevard Plan development since the Charrette,
. submitted a letter in support of the Draft Boulevard Plan and Design Standards (Exhibit 0).
C. LOS GATOS BOULEVARD PLAN SUMMARY:
The Draft Boulevard Plan is a long term plan to enhance Los Gatos Boulevard (Exhibit A). It contains
four sections with a corresponding Implementation Program. The four sections are summarized as
follows:
Public Improvements
The Plan provides guidelines for public improvements that:
1) Reconfigure some traffic lanes to improve traffic flow and increase safety;
2) Change the location of on -street parking to add landscaping and pedestrian areas;
3) Add bike lanes to both sides of the street;
4) Enhance the street and sidewalks to improve and promote neighborhood access to the
Boulevard and the businesses located there.
Nodes
Nodes are activity centers and focal points that can be for pedestrians and motorists. The Plan calls for
development of nodes at the following places:
Blossom Hill Road Los Gatos Almaden Road
New Town/ Village Square Lark Avenue
Between Samaritan Drive and
Lark Avenue
Nodes will have a clearly identifiable character that provide a break in the transportation corridor and
reflect the character of Los Gatos with unique hardscaping, landscaping and pedestrian amenities.
Land Use
As parcels become available for development or redevelopment, the Land Use goals and policies will
guide decision makers concerning:
1) Auto related uses and their locations;
2) A concentration of neighborhood commercial, multi -family residential and office uses south of
Los Gatos Almaden Road;
3) A concentration of single family residential and office use south of Shannon Road;
4) A concentration of mixed use commercial north of Lark Avenue.
Gateways
Gateways are encouraged to establish entry ways into the Town, create landmarks, welcome visitors,
spark civic pride and add a heightened sense of identity to the Town.
D. LOS GATOS BOULEVARD CONCEPT PLANS SUMMARY:
Five categories of graphic plans are included to provide a visual summary of the Draft Boulevard Plan:
Concept, Street Tree, Land Use, Street Sections and Node Concept. The Concept and Street Tree
Plans have been posted in the Planning Department foyer mid -July through August. The remaining
plans will be posted in the Council Chambers at the Planning Commission meeting. A summary of each
plan is provided below:
The Planning Commissio age 5
Los Gatos Boulevard Plan and Design Standards - ND-96-21
August 13, 1997
Concept Plan
Starting from the south end at Spencer Avenue, the highlights of the concept plan are:
1) The Nino signal relocation. The traffic signal currently located mid -block in front of Van Meter School
will be relocated to Nino Avenue. The lane transition from two to four lanes will occur just south of the
new signal, to accommodate stacked cars. This change will increase safety for pedestrians and
motorists, especially children walking and biking to and from school. The signal relocation is funded in
the 1997-2005 CIP and is scheduled to occur in 1997.
2) Transition from four lanes to two lanes travelling southbound. This transition will occur north of Nino
Avenue; the Boulevard will be restriped in this area to delineate the lane reduction. The current bus stop
location in front of Van Meter School will remain. Access to the school will also remain the same. The
northbound transition will start immediately south of Nino to allow for additional stacking capacity.
3) Right turn lane reconfiguration at Blossom Hill Road. The existing "free right" turns at each corner
of the intersection will be reconfigured as conceptually indicated in Figure 5 of the Traffic Evaluation
(Exhibit F). The signals will provide a right turn overlap phasing, which will improve the overall level of
service at the intersection. The turn lanes will not be eliminated as the General Plan Committee had
earlier discussed before the traffic evaluation.
4) Nodes. Nodes are indicated on the map at locations designated in the Plan text. Nodes are activity
centers within neighborhoods and district that can be places for pedestrians and motorists; a place for
a "break" in the transportation corridor. Examples of private development that have been approved to
provide node amenities are the Blossom Hill Pavilion Center, the Cornerstone pad building (not
constructed yet), Speedee Lube and Office Depot. See the "Node Concept " for further detail.
5) On -street parking. The plan indicates where existing parking will remain, where it is currently
prohibited and where it is proposed for removal. The General Plan Committee designated the no parking
areas based on current levels of use; for example, cars are rarely if ever parked behind the residences
which back onto the Boulevard by Farley Road. In these areas where parking will be eliminated,
sidewalk and landscaped areas will replace the existing asphalt. The Street Sections provide more
information concerning the use of space where parking is eliminated.
Street Tree
The proposed street trees are indicated in three categories: conifers, deciduous and orchard trees. The
conifers include Redwoods and Canary Island Pines; the deciduous include London Plane, Red Oak,
and Bradford Pears; the orchard include Flowering Crabapple or Flowering Cherry. A large proportion
of the orchard trees are proposed as street trees between Garden Lane and Route 85. This pattern is
taken in part from suggestions from the Charrette.
Land Use
The Land Use Diagram indicates existing land uses as well as General Plan land use designations.
There are three General Plan land use designations that apply to the Boulevard: Low Density
Residential, Medium Density Residential and Mixed Use Commercial. The Land Use Goals and Policies
in the Boulevard Plan are based on the General Plan land use designations.
Street Sections
These plans are divided into three parts: two lane, four lane and six lane sections. Each part includes
two section types, one with parking on both sides of the street and one with no on -street parking.
Moving from south to north, the two lane section truly begins where Main Street turns into Los Gatos
Boulevard. Within the study area, the two lane section begins at Spencer Avenue and transitions to four
The Planning Commission - Fcge 6
Los Gatos Boulevard Plan and Design Standards - ND-96-21
August 13, 1997
lanes at Nino Avenue. The four lane section transitions into six lanes at Blossom Hill Road and
continues to Route 85.
Node Concept
The subject area is the intersection of Los Gatos Almaden Road and Los Gatos Boulevard. The plan
demonstrates ways to use space exclusive of building and parking lots. The intent of developing nodes
at these breaks in the transportation corridor is to create a sense of place for both pedestrians and
motorists and create identifiable Los Gatos character along Los Gatos Boulevard.
E. LOS GATOS BOULEVARD DESIGN STANDARDS SUMMARY:
The Draft Boulevard Design Standards are intended to provide guidance and specific recommendations
for the architectural treatment, organization and mix of buildings and open space in the Los Gatos
Boulevard Study Area. The Standards will serve as a tool for architects, designers, engineers, and
developers in preparing plans to be considered by the DRC and Planning Commission during the
Architecture and Site review process for new buildings, additions and minor exterior changes to existing
buildings.
The Development Guidelines section includes standards for site and building design. Site design
elements include building location, parking lot layout and pedestrian orientation. Building design
elements include mass and scale, texture and materials, and architectural elements. The emphasis in
all of these sections is on design integrity with respect to the natural and built environments unique to
Los Gatos. For example, the standards encourage building design with classic architectural forms and
site design with respect to natural amenities like trees. The standards also require consideration to
residential neighbors.
The Draft Boulevard Standards also have use specific requirements. The standards applicable to
specific uses are for Commercial, Mixed Use, Medium and High Density Residential, Gateways and
Nodes land use categories.
F. GENERAL PLAN AND ARCHITECTURAL STANDARDS COMMITTEES' RECOMMENDATIONS:
On July 9, 1997 the General Plan Committee recommended the Draft Los Gatos Boulevard Plan to the
Planning Commission for approval and recommendation to the Council for adoption. On July 16, 1997 the
Architectural Standards/ Hillside Committee recommended the Draft Los Gatos Boulevard Design Standards
for Planning Commission approval and recommendation to the Council for adoption.
The Planning Commission should then make the Recommended Negative Declaration (ND-96-21) and
recommend the Draft Los Gatos Boulevard Plan and Design Standards to the Town Council for adoption.
Lee E. Bowman, Planning Director
Prepared by: Kristine Syskowski, Assistant Planner
LEB:KS:sm
cc: General Plan Committee
Dennis Burrow, Architect
n:ldev\reportsllgbplan.ds
RESOLUTION 1995-9
RESOLUTION OF THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE
TOWN OF LOS GATOS ESTABLISHING INTERIM POLICIES
FOR DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS ALONG LOS GATOS
BOULEVARD FROM SPENCER AVENUE TO ROUTE 85
WHEREAS, the Town of Los Gatos is involved in a major study of Los Gatos
Boulevard; and
WHEREAS, applicants are anxious to move forward with development plans which
may for may not be consistent with the standards and policies that will result from the Los
Gatos Boulevard Design Study.
RESOLVED, the Town Council of the Town of Los Gatos hereby establishes the
following interim policies for development applications along Los Gatos Boulevard from
Spencer Avenue to Route 85.
1. Each applicant shall be responsible for reviewing the proceedings of the Los Gatos
Boulevard Design Charette and determining how those proceedings, the issues outlined
during the Charette, and the concerns of the residents, businesses, and property owners
along and behind Los Gatos Boulevard affect applicant's proposed project.
2. Each application shall include a written description of how the proposed project
and the process that was used to refine the proposal address the issues outlined during the
Charette and the concerns of the residents, businesses, and property owners along and
behind Los Gatos Boulevard. This description should be as detailed as necessary to provide
an in-depth explanation, and the Town expects that each application will be a part of a
dynamic study process for the Boulevard.
3. Applicants are encouraged to consider pre -application meetings with residents,
businesses, and property owners along and behind Los Gatos Boulevard, so that they may
better understand the questions and concerns that exist. Results of any such meetings can
be included as part of the description provided under Paragraph 2.
4. Applicants shall be advised of the schedule and status of the Los Gatos Boulevard
N:\SHAREIPLN1395.25
EMT
NATS:
ABSENT:
ABSiTAIN:
Al 1 EST:
Design Study at the time they file an application, and applicants are encouraged to become
active participants in that study process.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Town Council held on the 3rd
day of January, 1995, by the following vote:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
AYES: Randy Attaway, Joanne Benjamin, Steven Blanton, Linda Lubeck and
Patrick O'Laughlin, Mayor
None
None
None
SIGNED:
MAYOR OF THE TOWN' OF LOS GATOS
LOS GATOS, CALIFORNIA
CLERK OF THE TOWN OF LOS GATOS
LOS GATOS, CALIFORNIA
N:ISHARE\PIN1395.25
2
RESOLUTION 1995-88
RESOLUTION OF THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE
TOWN OF LOS GATOS ESTABLISHING THE LOS GATOS
BOULEVARD PLAN - MISSION, GOALS, AND OBJECTIVES
WHEREAS, the Town of Los Gatos is involved in a major study of Los Gatos Boulevard;
and
WHEREAS, it is necessary to establish the Los Gatos Boulevard Plan - Mission, Goals, and
Objectives to provide policy direction to various commissions and committees that will be working
on the Plan.
RESOLVED, the Town Council of the Town of Los Gatos hereby establishes the Los Gatos
Boulevard Plan - Mission, Goals, and Objectives attached hereto as Exhibit A.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Town Council held on the 19th day
of June, 1995, by the following vote:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
AYES: Randy Attaway, Joanne Benjamin, Steven Blanton, Linda Lubeck and Mayor
Patrick O'Laughlin
NAYS: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
SIGNED:
ATTEST:
CLERK OF THE TOWN OF LOS TOS
LOS GATOS, CALIFORNIA
n:\clev\resos11gblvdl.mgo
MAYOR OF THE TOWN OF LOS GATOS
LOS GATOS, CALIFORNIA
EXH T D
Revised: May 24, 1995
DBAEI
THE LOS GATOS BOULEVARD PLAN
Mission, Goals and Objectives
The Mission of the Los Gatos Boulevard Plan is to establish a partnership among residents,
businesses, property owners and the Town government to develop the Boulevard as a distinct place
that enhances the quality of life of the people of Los Gatos through its beauty, economic vitality and
community
To realize this Mission, the Goals of the Plan are to:
• Preserve and project the essence of Los Gatos' history, individuality, character, and natural
environment.
• Promote commercial activity that complements the whole Town. Provide a dependable
source of income, employment opportunities, goods and services.
• Provide for attractive, easy, and effective access to, from and through the Boulevard.
• Provide effective links and interfaces between neighborhoods and commercial areas.
Objectives:
To achieve these goals, the Los Gatos Boulevard Plan has the following objectives:
1. Gateways:
Major entrances to the Boulevard will have special landscaping, architecture, and/or artistic
displays that announce Los Gatos as a distinct area (e.g., Samaritan Drive and Lark Avenue).
2. Land Uses:
Land uses will include the following: open space, community recreation, entertainment, and
sufficient housing to support regional transportation centers. These uses will be
implemented in such a way to keep the transition from the higher density mixed use area in
the north to a mixture of residential and commercial clusters, and then to existing residential
in the south.
3. Streetscape:
The streetscape will be designed to protect and complement both valley and mountain vistas.
Underground utilities are a must. Areas of distinct pedestrian and bicycle amenities (e.g.,
public art, paths, benches, bike racks, streetlights, and transit stops) shall be clustered at key
activity centers, intersections, and crossing points.
FXffl8ITA
Draft Los Gatos Boulevard Plan
Mission, Goals ;and Objectives
Revised: May 24, 1995
Page 2
4. Buildings.
Architecture will provide distinctive, pedestrian friendly buildings which protect existing
vistas and open spaces. All buildings must incorporate materials, colors and styles that
reflect the history and character of Los Gatos.
5. Transportation:
To service the Boulevard, downtown and local neighborhoods, attractive bus / shuttle stops
and passenger drops will be Iocated at activity centers. The design of the road will facilitate
access to businesses and increase safety for and encourage use by pedestrians and bicyclists.
Connections to regional transportation to Santa Cruz, San Jose, and the Light Rail will be
concentrated at the gateways.
6. Development Incentives:
Residents, businesses, property owners and the Town government working in partnership
will identify and implement incentive programs for development.
7. Signage:
Signage will complement the streetscape and meet commercial needs.
N:IDEVIBUD'ALLIANCE
RESOLUTION 1995-105
RESOLUTION OF THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE
TOWN OF LOS GATOS AMENDING THE INTERIM POLICIES
FOR DEVELOPMFNT APPLICATIONS ALONG LOS GATOS
BOULEVARD FROM SPENCER AVENUE TO ROUTE 85
WHEREAS, the Town of Los Gatos is involved in a major study of Los Gatos Boulevard;
and
WHEREAS, applicants are anxious to move forward with development plans which may
or may not be consistent with the standards and policies that will result from the Los Gatos
Boulevard Design Study.
RESOLVED, the Town Council of the Town of Los Gatos hereby establishes the following
interim policies for development applications along Los Gatos Boulevard from Spencer Avenue to
Route 85.
1. Each applicant shall be responsible for reviewing the proceedings of the Los Gatos
Boulevard Design Charette in the booklet titled "A Vision for Los Gatos Boulevard" and
determining how those proceedings, the issues outlined during the Charette, and the concerns of the
residents, businesses, and property owners along and behind Los Gatos Boulevard affect applicant's
proposed project.
2. Each application shall include a written description of how the proposed project and the
process that was used to refine the proposal are consistent with the Los Gatos Boulevard Plan:
Mission, Goals and Objectives. The description shall also address the issues outlined in "A Vision
for Los Gatos Boulevard". This description should be as detailed as necessary to provide an in-depth
explanation. The Town expects that each application will be a part of a dynamic study process for
the Boulevard.
3. Applicants are encouraged to consider pre -application meetings with residents, businesses.
and property owners along and behind Los Gatos Boulevard, so that they may better understand the
questions and concerns that exist. Results of any such meetings can be included as part of the
description provided under Paragraph 2.
N:ISHARE\PLN0307.22
EXHIPri
4. Applicants shall be advised of the schedule and status of the Los Gatos Boulevard Design
Study at the time they file an application, and applicants are encouraged to become active
participants in that study process.
FURTHER RESOLVED, Resolution 1995-9 is hereby rescinded.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Town Council held on the 7th day
of August, 1995, by the following vote:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
AYES: Randy Attaway, Joanne Benjamin, Steven Blanton, Linda Lubeck,
Mayor Patrick O'Laughlin
NAYS: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
SIGNED:
ATTEST:
CLERK OF THE TOWN OF LOS GATOS
LOS GATOS, CALIFORNIA
N:ISHAREIPLN0807.22
MAYOR OF THE TOWN OF LOS GATOS
LOS GATOS, CALIFORNIA
2
MEMORANDUM
TO: Kristine Syskowski, Assistant Planner
FROM: nSVMark Wessel, Town Traffic Engineer
DATE: December 16, 1996
SUBJECT: Los Gatos Boulevard Plan Focused Traffic Evaluation
RECEI VED
DEC zq1996
TOWN PLANNING q f
By
As requested, we have performed an evaluation of focused elements of the draft Los Gatos Boulevard
Plan. It is emphasized that this is not a review of the Plan as a whole, nor does it address elements
such as the vision, goals, or policies. This evaluation, as discussed below, focused on the following
five specific elements:
• Arterial Function
• Lane Width
• Street Section Transition
• Parking Elimination
• Free Right Turn Movements
ARTERIAL FUNCTION
Among the goals of the Plan is the reduction of the speed of automobile traffic on Los Gatos
Boulevard. To address this from a circulation perspective, the current and anticipated function of the
street must be considered. A city circulation system normally consists of three major classifications
of streets:
A local street provides direct access to abutting properties and carries low volumes of traffic from
the properties to a nearby collector street.
A collector street collects traffic from local streets and carries it either to its destination over short
to intermediate distances within the city or to an arterial street. A collector street may provide an
intermediate level of direct access, and speeds and volumes are higher than for a local street.
An arterial street provides relatively limited direct access to abutting properties. Its function is to
move high volumes of traffic at high speeds over relatively long distances, frequently connecting to
neighboring cities in the region.
Afreeway carries very high volumes of traffic between regions at very high speeds. Access is totally
controlled.
1
toga F
For a circulation system to work well, it is important that it provide a balance of the different street
classifications. A local street should not be forced to carry high volumes of traffic if the abutting
properties are to be served well. Although a collector street can fulfill a wide range of goals, it is not
designed and should not be forced to serve as an arterial street. And, although arterial streets serve
as the backbone of an efficient circulation system, they are expensive, require significant right-of-way,
and do not lend themselves to providing convenient, safe access to abutting properties.
Los Gatos Boulevard currently functions as an arterial street, connecting high volumes of high speed
traffic from collector streets and the downtown area to the SR 85 freeway and the neighboring cities
of San Jose, Campbell, and Santa Clara. If the goal of reducing the speeds along the Boulevard is
achieved to a significant degree, it must be recognized that the ability of the street to function as an
arterial will be correspondingly impaired. This, in turn, could produce a variety of results. Significant
volumes of traffic could divert to parallel corridors, such as Winchester Boulevard, University
Avenue, or the SR 17 Freeway. The potential impact on these corridors would depend on the degree
to which traffic is impeded on Los Gatos Boulevard. Considering that the alternative routes would
not serve as desirable substitutes, it is possible that traffic along the Boulevard will resist attempts to
reduce the corridor speed. Depending on the corridor modifications made, this could lead to an
increased collision rate, caused by portions of the traffic stream that attempt to continue navigating
the corridor at high speed.
LANE WIDTH
To help reduce speed and provide more right-of-way for pedestrian areas, one of the policies of the
draft Los Gatos Boulevard Plan is to narrow the lane widths to the extent permitted by safety
considerations. Lane widths of 12 feet are considered standard, although narrower widths are
sometimes acceptable when right-of-way is limited and greater widths may provide some
capacity/safety advantages. Considering that the typical vehicle is much narrower than 12 feet, why
are lanes so wide, under what conditions may they be safely narrowed, and what may the effect of
such narrowing be?
Although the typical vehicle is less than six feet wide, ,a driver must divide his attention between
vehicle guidance (staying in his lane), speed control, accident avoidance (keeping an eye on other
traffic), and navigation (looking for street name signs or landmarks). He may also be distracted by
the radio, mobile telephone, or passengers. Of course, as the vehicle speed increases, so do the
demands on the driver's concentration, the degree to which the vehicle may drift within its lane, etc.
Where the driver travels within his lane is also influenced by the proximity of adjacent vertical
obstructions such as curbs, gutters, poles, trees, pedestrians, etc. Drivers tend to shy away from
curbs and gutters, especially if there are adjacent pedestrians. An adjacent bike lane, however,
enhances the perception of space and, depending on the volume of bicycle traffic, could actually cause
some drivers to travel closer to the bike lane line, thereby shying away from heavy traffic on their left.
Given the variety of factors involved, it is believed that minor adjustments to lane widths do not
significantly affect speed or safety. Although lane widths of 12 feet are the most desirable from a
2
i
safety and liability perspective, a reduction to 11 feet may not cause significant problems. Another
consideration would be to provide wider outside lanes with narrower inside lanes. A 12711'/12'
section would reduce right-of-way needs while maintaining standard lane widths adjacent to vertical
obstructions.
STREET SECTION TRANSITION
The Los Gatos Boulevard Plan provides for 2-lane, 4-lane, and 6-lane sections. Each transition
between sections actually consists of two transitions - a transition from a narrower street to a wider
street in one direction, and a transition from a wider to a narrower street in the other direction. This
is significant because the transitions are designed quite differently. When a lane is added, the
transition can be as abrupt as aesthetics permit, because no demands are placed on the driver. He
now simply has the choice of continuing in his lane or changing to the new lane. When a lane is to
be dropped, however, the signing, striping, and pavement transition requirements are extensive. The
distance required to perceive associated signs, realize that it will be necessary to merge with traffic
in an adjacent lane, signal, adjust speed, and execute the transition requires far more distance than one
would think. Figure 1, which is excerpted from the Caltrans Traffic Manual, illustrates a standard
lane drop design. For Los Gatos Boulevard, the total transition area should comprise approximately
1,000-1,500 feet, with the pavement transition itself occurring over approximately 300-500 feet. For
safety reasons, it is important that every effort be made to achieve this standard.
PARKING ELIMINATION
The prohibition of onstreet parking to provide more space for landscaping and pedestrian areas is
contemplated in certain areas along the Boulevard. As general rule, such prohibition should improve
traffic flow and safety, because it will eliminate conflicts between flowing traffic and vehicles making
parking/unparking maneuvers. However, the following cautionary notes are emphasized:
• Any modifications to the parking lane area should not affect travel lane alignment. If travel
lane alignment is to be modified, appropriate transitions must be provided.
• Care should be taken to avoid impacting bike laries. For instance, bike lane widths adjacent
to curbs/gutters must be wider than those next to parking lanes. Also, bike lane transitions
must not be too abrupt. Finally, irrigation for landscaping should be designed properly to
avoid overspray into the bike lane.
• Considering that the curbs will be nearer to the travel lanes, it may be desirable to provide a
landscaping buffer zone between the curb and the pedestrian traffic area. However, care
should be taken to avoid any landscaping, street furniture, etc. that could represent a sight
distance obstruction for traffic or pedestrians.
3
FREE RIGHT TURN MOVEMENTS
The intersection of Los Gatos Boulevard - Blossom Hill Road currently provides free right turn
movements on all four approaches. This is accomplished by placing the signal poles on triangular
islands and channelizing the right turn lanes to the outside of the islands so that the right turn traffic
is not controlled by the signals. Although this design tends to function fairly well, the right turn
movements are not strictly "free", because they are still subject to some constraints. For instance, the
east and west approaches do not have separate right turn approach lanes, which means right turn
traffic must wait for the green signal if three or more vehicles are waiting in the #2 through lane and
thereby blocking the access to the right turn lane. The north and south approaches, although they
have separate right turn approach lanes, must yield before entering the traffic stream on Blossom Hill
Road.
As stated previously, the intersection tends to operate fairly well, despite the constraints on the free
right turns. The current and future level of service was evaluated using two different methodologies.
Based on the CAPSSI method, the level of service is LOS C in both the AM and PM peak periods.
The Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) method yields LOS B. The ICU methodology, which
is described in Appendix A, was used for the additional analyses described later in this report.
Although the free right turns facilitate traffic flow, one disadvantage is that they are not relatively
"pedestrian friendly". For instance, pedestrians must always yield to vehicular traffic when crossing
to/from the curbs and the triangular islands, and they must frequently wait on the small triangular
islands for a "WALK" indication. In conjunction with the concepts proposed by the draft Los Gatos
Boulevard Plan, therefore, the question arises as to how the intersection could be made more
pedestrian friendly. Different concepts to achieve this were considered, with the conclusions outlined
below. For reference, the existing intersection geometrics are as shown in Figure 2.
Increase the Size of the Triangular Islands
Except for the southwest island, the triangular islands are all of minimal size. A significant increase
in size would improve the pedestrian comfort level. Because the through lane widths are already
narrow, the islands could not be widened at the expense of through lane width. One option would
therefore be to acquire additional right-of-way on the corners and shift the right turn lanes out,
thereby providing additional room for expanding the islands. It is likely that this could be
accomplished without causing significant impacts to adjacent properties on the northwest and
northeast corners, but there is limited area that could be acquired on the southeast corner without
affecting the service station onsite circulation. However, the curb return radius in this corner is
currently greater than at the other corners, which may permit a shorter radius to work in conjunction
with a minimal right-of-way acquisition.
-4
1
Narrow the Right Turn Lanes
If the corner curb returns were to remain unchanged but the right turn lanes narrowed, additional area
would be made available for the triangular islands as shown in Figure 3. This would offer the
additional benefits of eliminating the need for right-of-way acquisition and reducing the distances
pedestrians must travel between the curbs and the islands. The right turn lanes are currently located
within the 20' ± wide openings between the curbs and the islands, which facilitates safe, efficient turn
movements. These lanes could be narrowed perhaps 3-5 feet without significantly impeding autos,
buses, single -unit trucks, and semi -trailer combinations up to 50 feet long. This would represent a
25% reduction in the pedestrian travel path between curb and island. Except for the northwest island,
which would remain unchanged, this would also result in islands 200-400% the size of the existing
islands. However, 55 foot semi -trailer combinations may not be able to negotiate the turn safely.
Eliminate the Free Right Turns
As shown in Figure 4, elimination of the free right turn movements would eliminate the triangular
islands and the need for pedestrians to cross the right turn lanes and wait on the islands. Since the
level of service as determined by the ICU method is based on the sum of critical conflicting movement
V/C ratios (as explained in Appendix A), and right turn movements are generally not critical
movements, the LOS is frequently not sensitive to right turn movements. The Los Gatos Boulevard -
Blossom Hill Road intersection is no exception to this rule. As shown in the following table,
elimination of the free right turn movements (Scenario 2) would not appear to affect the ICU values
for either existing or future volumes, because the right turns are not critical movements. The level
of service would remain LOS B for AM and PM peak periods.
SCENARIO
GEOMETRICS
PHASING
VOLUMES
AM
PM
ICU
LOS
ICU
LOS
1
Existing
Existing
Existing
0.67
B
0.60
A
Future
0.68
B
0.62
B
2
No free right
Existing
Existing
0.67
B
0.60
A
Future
0.68
B
0.62
B
-
3
No free right
NB/SB OL
Existing
0.67
B
0.60
A
Future
0.68
B
0.62
B
4
No free right,
add WBRT
NB/SB/WB OL
Existing
0.58
A
0.56
A
Future
0.58
A
0.58
A
NB/SB OL = Northbound and southbound right turn overlap signal phasing
WBRT = Westbound right turn lane
5
a
However, there would be some operational impacts if the free right turn movements were eliminated.
As can be seen in Figure 4, pedestrians would have a greater distance to walk between corners. This
would require additional seconds of pedestrian signal timing for those cycles when pedestrians are
present. Although right turns on red would still be permitted, the right turn movements would still
not function as efficiently as they do currently. This could be partially mitigated through the
implementation of right turn overlap signal phasing.
Eliminate the Free Right Turns but Provide Overlap Phasing
A right turn overlap phase provides a right turn arrow during the non -conflicting left turn phase. For
instance, a southbound right turn overlap would permit southbound right turn traffic to make their
turns concurrently with the eastbound left turn phase. This is an excellent way to improve overall
traffic flow, with the only drawback being that U-turns must be prohibited from the associated left
turn lane (the eastbound left turn lane, in this example). Although it would not be reflected in the
ICU calculation (Scenario 3 in the table), the provision of northbound and southbound right turn
overlaps would significantly improve the operation of those movements.
In consideration of the high westbound right turn volume during the morning peak, it would also be
helpful to provide a westbound right turn overlap. However, the effectiveness of the overlap would
be constrained by the lack of a right turn lane, as the existing free right turn is. Furthermore, it
appears that there is not enough width available to provide a right turn lane through restriping.
Provision of an effective westbound right overlap would therefore entail the acquisition of a small
portion of right-of-way and the construction of additional widening, as shown in Figure 5. These
improvements would provide LOS A during both peak periods for existing and future volumes.
SUMMARY
Los Gatos Boulevard currently functions as an arterial street, serving high volumes of high speed
traffic that are traveling relatively long distances. Efforts to impede this flow should be carefully
considered, in view of the potential effects on safety and parallel route congestion.
With care, lane widths can be narrowed to 11 feet without significantly affecting traffic speed or
safety. The same applies to parking prohibitions. Transitions that widen the street to add a lane can
occur relatively abruptly, whereas those that narrow the street to drop a lane must be relatively long.
Of the various alternatives considered, the least expensive way to make the Los Gatos Boulevard -
Blossom Mill Road intersection more "pedestrian friendly" would be to reduce the width of the free
right turn lanes and enlarge the triangular islands. However, right-of-way acquisition and corner
widening would be necessary to safely facilitate 55 foot trucks. The free right turns and islands could
also be eliminated without reducing the level of service to an unacceptable level. In fact, construction
of a westbound right turn lane, with northbound, southbound, and westbound right turn overlap
phasing, would represent an overall level of service improvement.
06682/4013
6L00033.MEM
6
Traffic Manual
MARKINGS
W7S
Figure 6-15
TYPICAL LANE REDUCTION TRANSITION
Edge of Traffic Lane
DO
NOT
PASS
R63
W11
(See Note 6)
'L'
(See Note 1 & 2)
6-37
11-1991
Edge of Traffic Lane
NOTES:
1. The Length of Transition (L) is a minimum desirable length. It is computed by formula L=WS
for all highways with speeds of 45 MPH or more. On urban, residential and other streets where
speeds are 40 MPH or less, the formula L=vg' may be used. Adequate sight distance and
the proximity to a freeway ramp, crossroad, etc., may dictate the need for adjustments. In general,
better traffic operations will result when the adjustments consist of increasing the length of
a transition rather than a reduction.
2. Delineators should be placed at approximately a 200' spacing, with a minimum of 3 delineators,
throughout the entire length of a lane reduction transition. See Section 6-04.4.
3. Lane Reduction Arrows are optional on highways where speeds are 40 MPH or less. A second
set may be placed in advance of the W75 sign when it is used. See Note 5.
4. On urban, residential or other streets where speeds are 40 MPH or less, the distance for place-
ment of the W11 sign may be reduced to a minimum of 100'.
5. The W75 should be placed in conjunction with the W11 sign. Adequate sight distance or the
proximity to a freeway ramp, crossroad, etc., may dictate the need and/or the location.
6. The R63 sign should not be used on a freeway or expressway, etc., where two or more lanes
remain after a lane is dropped.
7. A left lane drop should be avoided on undivided roadways because of the difficulty in placing
signs to warn motorists in the left lane.
LEGEND
L =Lane Reduction Length (In Feet)
W=Offset Distance (In Feet)
S=Off Peak 85 Percentile Speed
(In 5 MPH intervals), or the
Design Speed may be used
on new construction.
FIGURE 1
CALTRANS LANE DROP DESIGN\
11. • Direction of Travel
Lane Reduction Arrow
I=Delineators (Type F)
NOT TO SCALE
LG—BH. 6' Z96
,
1
\\\
1
l
t 1
1 1
11
11
1 I
I
LOS GATOS BLVD.
1I 11
It 11
1 Ill It 1
lI 11
1,, I11
�� I11
1111
I lI 11
I\ 11
II It
1
1 1�l 11
11 11
,
t 1 Ill 1
1 ll 11
1 ll It
1 11 11
t 1I 11
1, ICII
I 11
1 II 11
1
Ij1 11
1 11 11
1 tt 1
l \1 11
1 ll ll
1 tt 11
, ll 11
1 1111
1 ;t1 tl
1 I` IIt
13
Il
1 1411
I�S
L Z.'
_.-_1 _L J-LJ .J I 1 t<� CS-�.
1 I 1
I I 1
1 I 1
- -1 I r
t 1
1 I I
I I L
)11I 1
1 1
I I `
r. `i r+ 1 I -
1 t t 1,
y l I
1
, Gr 1 1 t 1
1 1
1 I
I 1
I
t
1� L
TJ S/
/ / 7 7
-� : ---
\'/' ; 1 4 ; 1) •
t �
\\'
1 � I I / /
t
l I
1 l
1 l
11
1
1
1 1 t
1 1
1 t
1 I
1
, 1
% '1 i
1 1
1 l
1 1 1
1 \ I 11
1 ,
1 1 1 1 i 1 `1\I
NO SCALE 1 111
`, 1 1111
\ 1;
\1 `" 11
\\l
l\I\
1FIGURE2 I I11
EXISTING GEOMETRCS I'
LG-BH.161296
l
LOS GATOS BLVD.
i I+
\ \ti
110
1 11 I
""
l l�l 11
1 1;1 11
1, 11
1 11 1;
t;1 11
11 11
1 11 11
t 11 11
1111
1+ 11
1 , 1
I 11 11
11 1l
I ,1 1l
I II ,l ll
1 j1 11l
1 j111
+ ,111
1 11 11
1 ,111
1 ,1 11
+ 1111
;1'll
1 1, Il
1 ,1 1+
I, 11
,l ll
1 j1 It
1 j1 11
11�1
1
l�S
tit::i:\\
1
NO SCALE
FIGURE 3
NARROW RIGHT TURN LANES
1
1
a
L_
0
-23
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 r
1 1
1 l-
1
1 l ��
1 1
I r
1 J4
1 1 v
l 1
L l
1 1
l �
l l
1 1�-rZ�-
Y1 l ,-1
v
e ,
LOS GATOS BLVD.
NO SCALE
FIGURE 4
NO FREE RIGHT TURNS
LG-BH.161296
i
k
LOS GATOS BLVD.
\41%h
111
\\
1� 11
NO SCALE ` � 11
FIGURE 5
I
ADD WESTBOUND RIGHT TURN LANE '1 11
t
LC-BH.161296
I
6' e aaw 4.,,a ' tom , 2 v
JAN 31 1997
TOWN OF LOS GA TOS
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Initial Study
Los Gatos Boulevard Plan
Prepared for
Town of Los Gatos
Civic Center
110 E. Main Street
Los Gatos, CA 95030
January 1997
Prepared by
Geier & Geier Consulting, Inc.
P.O. Box 5054
Berkeley, CA 94705-5054
510/644-2535
EXHIBIT G
Initial Study
Environmental Checklist
1. Project Title: Los Gatos Boulevard Plan
2. Lead Agency Name
and Address: Town of Los Gatos
Planning Department
110 East Main Street
Los Gatos, CA 95031
3. Contact Person and
Phone Number: Kristine Syskowski, 408/354-6807
4. Project Location: Los Gatos Boulevard from the Route 85 interchange on the north to Spencer
Road on the south (1.8 miles)
5. Project Sponsor's
Name and Address: Town of Los Gatos
Planning Department
110 East Main Street
Los Gatos, CA 95031
6. General Plan
Designation: This section of Los Gatos Boulevard is designated as an "Arterial" road. General
Plan land use designations along this section of Los Gatos Boulevard include
"Mixed Use Commercial" with some areas of "Low Density Residential" and
"Medium Density Residential" south of Lark Avenue.
7. Zoning: Not Applicable.
8. Description
of Project:
January 29, 1997
The proposed Plan establishes short-, medium-, and long-range goals, policies,
and implementation measures for improvements along Los Gatos Boulevard.
The overall goals of the Plan are to preserve and project the character and
history of Los Gatos while promoting commercial activity, easy/effective access,
and neighborhood links/interfaces along the Boulevard. The Plan identifies
opportunities/constraints, goals, and policies for the following Plan objectives:
Public Improvements, Gateways, Private Improvements, Land Use, and Nodes.
Plan policies that would result in physical changes are listed as follows:
Public Improvements
Policy 1: Los Gatos Boulevard shall have six lanes of traffic (three in each
direction) from the northern Town boundary to Blossom Hill Road,
then narrowing between Blossom Hill Road and Shannon Road to
four lanes of traffic (two in each direction), then narrowing to two lanes
(one in each direction) from Shannon Road south.
1
l
Initial Study - Los Gatos Boulevard Plan
Policy 2: Traffic lanes on Los Gatos Boulevard and up to one street off the
Boulevard on Blossom Hill Road shall be narrowed as much as
possible while remaining compatible with safety and traffic flow
requirements.
Policy 4: On -street parking shall be creatively designed to coordinate the
efficient flow of motorists, pedestrians, and bicyclists. Where on -
street parking is used infrequently, the Town will consider replacing
on -street parking with landscaping and pedestrian and/or bicycle
improvements, subject to engineering analysis.
Policy 5: Free right turns shall be preserved wherever they can be safely and
efficiently designed and coordinated with nodes.
Policy 6: The right-of-way gained by the narrowing traffic lanes, redesigning on -
street parking and reconfiguring free right turn lanes shall be used for
enhanced driveways, transit turnouts, sidewalks, bike lanes,
landscaping, nodes, and street furniture where permitted.
Nodes
Policy 1: Each node site shall have a clearly identifiable character as reflected
through its hardscape, landscaping, and street signage.
Policy 2: Crossing surfaces, paths and signal timing shall be conducive to and
encourage pedestrian crossing and promote pedestrian and bicycle
safety.
Implementation Program
Improvement 1: Nodes would be located at the following intersections:
Blossom Hill Road, Los Gatos Almaden Road, New
Town/Village Square, Lark Avenue, and between Samaritan
Drive and Lark Avenue as consistent with future
development.
Land Use
Policy 2: New and relocating auto -related businesses shall be located: (a)
north of Los Gatos Almaden Road; (b) adjacent to existing auto
dealerships; or (c) on a vacant site previously used for permitted
auto sales.
Policy 3: Neighborhood commercial, multi -family residential, and office uses
shall be concentrated south of Los Gatos Almaden Road.
Policy 4: Uses on Los Gatos Boulevard south of Shannon Road shall be
residential or office; existing non-residential uses would not be
2
January 29, 1997
i
Initial Study - Los Gatos Boulevard Plan
Policy 5:
intensified and existing vacant property and residential uses would
developed as Single Family Residential.
Commercial and mixed use development north of Lark Avenue shall
be in keeping with the Route 85 element of the General Plan and
shall provide/incorporate Boulevard, Downtown and regional transit
access accordingly.
Implementation Program
Improvement 4: Explore use of "air space" over Seven Mile Reservoir for auto
storage or recreational purposes.
Gateways
Policy 2: Gateways shall be encouraged along Los Gatos Boulevard and at
other main entrances to Town.
Implementation Program
Improvement 1: Locate a gateway at Samaritan Drive.
Private Improvements
Policy 3: Proposals shall be designed to minimize interference with the
privacy, quiet, and views of surrounding residential properties.
Policy 6: Pedestrian access to buildings and sites shall be encouraged.
9. Surrounding Land Uses
and Setting: This 1.8-mile section of Los Gatos Boulevard varies in width from two to six travel
lanes with a landscaped median along most of the Boulevard. On -street parking
is also allowed on both sides along most of this section of the Boulevard. Land
uses along this section of Los Gatos Boulevard include: mixed use commercial,
neighborhood shopping centers, auto sales, repair services, offices, and
residential uses.
10. Other agencies whose
approval is required
(e.g., permits, financing
approval, or participation
agreements): None.
Environmental Factors Potentially Affected:
The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least
one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages.
3
January 29, 1997
Initial Study - Los Gatos Boulevard Plan
Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
Issues (and Supporting Information Sources)
I. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the proposal:
a) Conflict with general plan designation or zoning?
b) Conflict with applicable environmental plans or policies
adopted by agencies with jurisdiction over the project?
c) Be incompatible with existing land use in the vicinity?
d) Affect agricultural resources or operations (e.g., impacts
to soils or farmlands, or impacts from incompatible
land uses)?
e) Disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an
established community (including a low-income or
minority community)?
Potentially
Significant
Potentially Unless Less Than
Significant Mitigation Significant No
Impact Incorporated Impact Impact
r=1 ID
Li Li 1:1
This section of Los Gatos Boulevard is designated as an "Arterial" street. The General Plan defines
arterial streets as streets that serve a large volume of vehicular traffic with intersections at grade and
generally having direct access to abutting property, and on which geometric design and traffic control
measures are used to expedite the safe movement of through traffic. Arterials are designed to facilitate
two or more lanes of moving traffic in each direction. Arterials may be divided by a median island which
controls left turns and provides lanes for left -turn movements. The General Plan also specifies the
following road improvements for Los Gatos Boulevard:
(3)
LOS GATOS BOULEVARD
Samaritan Drive to Camino del Sol: Widen the road to 6 lanes with median and parking and to 4
lanes with median, bike lanes, and parking.
Nino Avenue to Spencer Avenue: Improve the circulation along this portion by widening the road
to 4 lanes with median, bike lanes, sidewalks and parking.
The proposed Plan would not alter this designation. The proposed changes for Los Gatos Boulevard
would not conflict with this designation since the objective of the proposed Plan is to maintain safe,
smooth, and efficient traffic flows. However, the effects of specified improvements on traffic flows are
discussed below under Section VI, Transportation/Circulation. Public Improvements Policy 1 specifies
development of six lanes from the northern Town boundary to Blossom Hill Road, narrowing to four
lanes between Blossom Hill Road and Shannon Road, then narrowing to two lanes from Shannon Road
south. The proposed Plan would not be consistent with the above General Plan policy for the section
5
January 29, 1997
Initial Study - Los Gatos Boulevard Plan
Boulevard between Nino Avenue and Spencer Avenue, which calls for four lanes where the proposed
Plan specifies two lanes. In addition, it is not clear whether the proposed Plan improvements specified for
the section of Los Gatos Boulevard near the northern Town boundary, (proposed to be six lanes), is
entirely consistent with the six and four lane improvements specified in the General Plan for this section of
the Boulevard. To resolve this inconsistency, the following measure will be implemented:
1. The General Plan will be revised as follows:
"(3) Samaritan Drive to Camino del Sol: Widen the road to 6 lanes with median, on -street
parking and bike lanes,"
The General Plan will also be amended to specify a consistent number of lanes for Los Gatos
Boulevard between the northern Town boundary and Spencer Avenue.
Land Use Policies 2 through 5 emphasize location of: (1) new auto -related businesses generally north of
Los Gatos Almaden Road, adjacent to existing auto dealerships, or on a vacant site previously used for
permitted auto sales; (2) neighborhood commercial, multi -family residential, and office uses south of Los
Gatos Almaden Road; (3) residential or office uses south of Shannon Road (existing non-residential uses
would not be intensified and existing vacant property would developed as single-family residential); and
(4) commercial and mixed use development north of Lark Avenue (in keeping with the Route 85 Element
of the General Plan). Implementation Program Land Use Improvement 4 specifies exploration of auto
storage or recreational uses in the "air space" over Seven Mile Reservoir.
Proposed uses would be consistent with the General Plan land use designations along Los Gatos
Boulevard. For the northern section of Los Gatos Boulevard, proposed Policy 5 specifies consistency
with land use designations of the Route 85 Element of the General Plan (1993), which supersedes land
use designations contained in the General Plan Land Use Plan (1991). Proposed Policy 2 would be
consistent with the General Plan "Mixed Use Commercial" land use designation for the section of the
Boulevard between Lark Avenue and Los Gatos Almaden Road. Proposed Policy 3 would also be
generally consistent with the mixed use commercial and residential General Plan designations along Los
Gatos Boulevard south of Los Gatos Almaden Road. The General Plan designates residential and school
uses along the section of Los Gatos Boulevard south of Shannon Road, and proposed Policy 4 would be
consistent with these designations since existing non-residential uses would not be intensified. The
General Plan and Zoning Ordinance designate the Seven Mile Reservoir property for low density
residential uses, which would not necessarily allow for auto storage or recreational uses. However,
Improvement 4 specifies exploration by the Town of the "air space" over Seven Mile Reservoir for auto
storage or recreational purposes, and no specific use is proposed. Therefore, this improvement does not
directly conflict with the General Plan land use designation for this property. Before any specific use can
approved for the air space over the reservoir, a General Plan amendment would be required if it is found to
be inconsistent with the existing land use designation.
6
January 29, 1997
Initial Study - Los Gatos Boulevard Plan
Issues (and Supporting Information Sources)
II. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the proposal:
a) Cumulatively exceed official regional or local population
projections?
b) Induce substantial growth in an area either directly or
indirectly (e.g., through projects in an undeveloped area or
extension of major infrastructure)?
c) Displace existing housing, especially affordable
housing?
Potentially
Significant
Potentially Unless Less Than
Significant Mitigation Significant No
Impact Incorporated Impact Impact
Li Li Li
Land Use Policy 4 of the proposed Plan specifies that uses on Los Gatos Boulevard south of Shannon
Road would be residential or office, with no intensification of existing non-residential uses and
development of existing vacant property and residential uses as single-family residential. The proposed
Plan would be consistent with the Land Use Element of the General Plan, which specifies low -density (0-5
units per acre) and medium -density (5-12 units per acre) residential uses along this section of the
Boulevard. Such residential densities would allow for single-family detached or attached residential units.
Since the proposed Plan would be consistent with the General Plan, it would not pose any significant
changes to anticipated growth in this area of Los Gatos. Since the Plan does not alter existing General
Plan designations along Los Gatos Boulevard, the proposed Plan would not induce new growth or
encourage intensification of existing land uses. Land Use policies of the proposed Plan provide
guidelines for redevelopment along the Boulevard, which is already mostly developed. No existing
housing would be removed by the proposed Plan.
III. GEOLOGIC PROBLEMS. Would the proposal result in
or expose people to potential impacts involving:
a) Fault rupture?'
b) Seismic ground shaking?
c) Seismic ground failure, including liquefaction?
d) Seiche, tsunami, or volcanic hazard?
❑ ❑ Ell ❑
El
1Town of Los Gatos, 1985. Town of Los Gatos General Plan Seismic Safety Element, Geologic
Hazards, Map No. 126. February 4.
7
January 29, 1997
Initial Study - Los Gatos Boulevard Plan
Issues (and Supporting Information Sources)
e) Landslides or mudflows?
f) Erosion, changes in topography or unstable soil
conditions from excavation, grading, or fill?
g) Subsidence of the land?
h) Expansive soils?
i) Unique geologic or physical features?
Potentially
Significant
Potentially Unless Less Than
Significant Mitigation Significant No
Impact Incorporated Impact Impact
❑ ❑ ❑
The Los Gatos General Plan Seismic Safety Element2 indicates the project site is located within an area
identified as having "moderate -to -minor geotechnical hazard." Los Gatos Boulevard traverses the
Shannon Fault Zone south of Lark Avenue. Other than street improvements (restriping, changes in
lane striping, curb changes, street furniture, landscaping, etc.) no new development would occur
directly as a result of implementation the proposed Plan. Such improvements would be required to be
constructed to building code standards, and would not be subject to any unique geotechnical
constraints. Any new public or private development that would occur along Los Gatos Boulevard would
be subject to seismic hazards similar to other existing development in the project area. Specific private
development projects would be subject to Town requirements for preparation of project -specific soil
engineering and geotechnical studies at the time a specific development proposal is made.
IV. WATER. Would the proposal result in:
a) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns,
or the rate and amount of surface runoff?
b) Exposure of people or property to water related
hazards such as flooding?
c) Discharge into surface waters or other alteration of surface
water quality (e.g., temperature, dissolved oxygen or
turbidity)?
d) Changes in the amount of surface water in any
water body?
Li LI
2Town of Los Gatos, 1985. Town of Los Gatos General Plan Seismic Safety Element, Geologic
Hazards, Map No. 126. February 4.
8
January 29, 1997
i
Initial Study - Los Gatos Boulevard Plan
Issues (and Supporting Information Sources)
e) Changes in currents or the course or direction of
water movements?
f) Changes in the quantity of ground waters, either through
direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an
aquifer by cuts or excavations, or through substantial loss of
groundwater recharge capability?
g)
Altered direction or rate of flow of ground water?
h) Impacts to groundwater quality?
i) Substantial reduction in the amount of water otherwise
available for public water supplies?
Potentially
Significant
Potentially Unless Less Than
Significant Mitigation Significant No
Impact Incorporated Impact Impact
fill
❑ ❑ ❑ l::l
Street improvements that are specified in proposed Plan policies would be located in areas that are
already developed or covered by impervious surfaces. Therefore, Plan implementation would not result
in any significant change in existing drainage conditions or peak flow volumes. In addition, proposed
Nodes would involve development of small areas, which would not significantly alter peak flow volumes.
The introduction of new landscaped areas could result in a minor reduction in impervious surfaces, which
would slightly reduce surface runoff volumes. Any new development or redevelopment along Los Gatos
Boulevard that occurs in accordance with Land Use policies of the Plan would be evaluated on a project -
specific basis for specific changes in surface runoff volumes and storm drainage requirements.
V. AIR QUALITY. Would the proposal:
a) Violate any air quality standard or contribute to an
existing or projected air quality violation?
b) Expose sensitive receptors to pollutants?
c) Alter air movement, moisture, or temperature, or any
change in climate?
d) Create objectionable odors?
Implementation of the proposed Plan would not generate any new traffic. However, as noted in the
Transportation/Circulation section below, any improvements which result in reduced travel speeds or
impairment of the Boulevard's function as an arterial could result in more congestion along the Boulevard
and traffic could divert to other parallel corridors. Reduced travel speeds would result in an incremental
9
January 29, 1997
Initial Study - Los Gatos Boulevard Plan
increase in vehicular air pollutant emissions. Emissions could be further increased if vehicles are forced to
idle longer due to traffic congestion. In addition, if traffic diverted to other parallel corridors, traffic
increases along those corridors would result in localized increases in air pollutant emissions. The
significance of these local and regional emissions increases would depend on the degree of travel speed
reduction and the amount of traffic diverted to other parallel corridors. However, implementation of
Mitigation Measure #2 below would reduce the potential for these increased emissions to a less -than -
significant level.
Issues (and Supporting Information Sources)
Potentially
Significant
Potentially Unless Less Than
Significant Mitigation Significant No
Impact Incorporated Impact Impact
VI. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION. Would the proposal result in:
a) Increased vehicle trips or traffic congestion?
b) Hazards to safety from design features (e.g., sharp
curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible
uses (e.g., farm equipment)?
c) Inadequate emergency access or access to nearby
uses?
d) Insufficient parking capacity on -site or off -site?
e) Hazards or barriers for pedestrians or bicyclists?
f) Conflicts with adopted policies supporting alternative
transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks)?
g) Rail, waterborne or air traffic impacts?
❑ ❑ ❑
Proposed Public Improvement Policies 1, 2, 4, 5, and 6 specify: (1) narrowing of traffic lanes on Los Gatos
Boulevard and up to one street off the Boulevard on Blossom Hill Road (while remaining compatible with
safety and traffic flow requirements); (2) design of on -street parking to allow for the efficient flow of
motorists, pedestrians and bicyclists, or elimination of on -street parking where it is used infrequently; (3)
preservation of free right turns wherever they can be safety and efficiently designed and coordinated with
nodes; and (4) use of the right-of-way gained by the above improvements shall be used for enhanced
driveways, transit turnouts, sidewalks, bike lanes, landscaping, nodes, and street furniture where
permitted.
A traffic study was prepared by the Town Traffic Engineer in December 1996, and a copy of this study is
on file at the Los Gatos Planning Department. It focused on five specific elements of the proposed Plan:
(1) arterial function; (2) lane width; (3) street section transition; (4) parking elimination; and (5) free right -
turn movements. Study findings are summarized as follows:
10
January 29, 1997
Initial Study - Los Gatos Boulevard Plan
Arterial Function. Public Improvement Goal 1 is "To reduce travel speeds along the Boulevard through
design improvements, while maintaining a safe, smooth and efficient flow for both local and through traffic
including emergency vehicles." Los Gatos Boulevard currently functions as an arterial street, connecting
high volumes of high speed traffic from collector streets and the downtown area to the SR 85 freeway and
the neighboring cities of San Jose, Campbell, and Santa Clara. Based on the assumption that the intent
of Goal 1 is nQ to reduce travel speeds to below the posted speed limit, this Goal would not result in any
significant change in traffic conditions. Higher travel speeds typically occur when volumes are low enough
to allow free flow of traffic, whereas slower travel speeds occur along the Boulevard during peak traffic
periods. Therefore, reducing travel speeds to the existing speed limit would occur primarily during the
non -peak traffic periods and would not affect operations during the more congested, peak traffic periods.
It should be noted, however, that implementation of the design improvements listed in this report are not
intended to slow travel speeds, but would minimize the identified potential effects of traffic diversions and
traffic safety problems.
If travel speeds along the Boulevard were reduced to below the speed limit (which is assumed to not be
the intent of Goal 1), the ability of the street to function as an arterial would be correspondingly impaired.
This, in turn, could produce a variety of results. Significant volumes of traffic could divert to parallel
corridors, such as Winchester Boulevard, University Avenue, or the SR 17 Freeway. The potential impact
on these corridors would depend on the degree to which traffic is impeded on Los Gatos Boulevard.
Considering that the alternative routes would not serve as desirable substitutes, it is possible that traffic
along the Boulevard would resist attempts to reduce the corridor speed. Depending on the corridor
modifications made, this could lead to an increased collision rate, caused by portions of the traffic stream
that attempt to continue navigating the corridor at high speed. The significance of the impacts associated
with meeting this Plan goal would depend on the degree that travel speeds were reduced by the
proposed design improvements.
Lane Width. Implementation of Public Improvement Policy 2 would narrow lane widths to reduce speeds
and provide additional right-of-way for pedestrian areas and other public improvements. Minor adjustment
to existing lane widths would not significantly affect speed or safety. Although the existing lane widths of
12 feet are considered standard and are the most desirable from a safety and liability perspective, a
reduction to 11 feet may not cause significant problems. Another consideration would be to provide wider
outside lanes with narrower inside lanes. A 12-foot/11-foot/12-foot section would reduce right-of-way
needs while maintaining standard lane widths adjacent to vertical obstructions (e.g., curbs, gutters, poles,
trees, pedestrians, etc.). To ensure that safety problems are not created or travel speeds are not
reduced, the following measure shall be required:
2. Pursuant to Public Improvement Policy 2, the Implementation Program shall specify that lane width
reduction along Los Gatos Boulevard be limited to 11 feet to maintain traffic safety and travel
speeds.
Street Section Transition. The proposed Plan provides for two-, four-, and six -lane sections. Each
transition between these sections consists of one transition in each direction, with the transition from a
wider section to a narrower section being much longer than the transition from a narrower section to a
wider section. To maintain traffic safety, the following measures shall be required:
3. Pursuant to Public Improvement Policy 1, the Implementation Program shall specify that lane drop
transitions between two-, four-, and six -lane sections be designed in accordance with the Caitrans
11
January 29, 1997
Initial Study - Los Gatos Boulevard Plan
Traffic Manual to the extent possible, with total transition area comprising approximately 1, 000-
1,500 feet, with the pavement transition itself occurring over approximately 300-500 feet.
4. Pursuant to Public Improvement Policy 1, the Implementation Program shall specify that the
southbound transition from four to two lanes shall occur north of Nino Avenue and not in front of
Van Meter School.
Parking Elimination. Implementation of Public Improvement Policy 3 would result in the prohibition of on -
street parking along some sections of the Boulevard to provide more space for public improvements
(landscaping, pedestrian areas). In general, such parking prohibition should improve traffic flow and
safety, because it would eliminate conflicts between flowing traffic and vehicles making parking/unparking
maneuvers. No significant adverse impacts are anticipated from implementation of Public Improvement
Policy 3 assuming the following measures are implemented as part of this policy:
5. Modifications to the parking lane area shall not adversely affect travel lane alignment. If travel lane
alignment is modified, appropriate transition must be provided.
6. Modifications to the parking lane area shall not adversely affect bike lanes. Bike lane width adjacent
to curbs/gutters are generally wider than those next to parking lanes. Also, bike lane transitions
must not be too abrupt. Finally, irrigation for proposed landscaped areas shall be designed so as
not to overspray into the bike lane.
7. A landscaping buffer zone will be installed between the curb and sidewalk wherever the parking
lane is removed since removal of the parking lane area will result in curbs being closer to the travel
lanes.
8. At all proposed nodes and landscaped/pedestrian areas where landscaping and street furniture
would be provided, all improvements shall be designed so as not to create sight distance problems
for traffic or pedestrians.
Free Right Turn Movements. Public Improvement Policy 5 calls for the preservation of free right turns
wherever they can be safely and efficiently designed and coordinated with nodes. Nodes are proposed at
the following Los Gatos Boulevard intersections: Blossom Hill Road, Los Gatos Almaden Road, New
Town/Village Square, Lark Avenue, and between Samaritan Drive and Lark Avenue as consistent with
future development. The traffic study only examined potential changes at the Blossom Hill Road
intersection because this is the only node intersection where free right turns would be eliminated under
the proposed Plan. Free right turns would be maintained at all other node intersections, consistent with
Policy 5. Several alternatives were considered in the traffic study and the study concluded that the least
expensive way to make the Los Gatos Boulevard/Blossom Hill Road intersection more "pedestrian
friendly" would be to reduce the width of the free right turn lanes and enlarge the triangular islands.
However, right-of-way acquisition and corner widening would be necessary to safely facilitate 55-foot
trucks. The free right turns and islands could also be eliminated without reducing the level of service to an
unacceptable level. In fact, construction of a westbound right -turn lane, with northbound, southbound,
and westbound right -turn overlap phasing, would represent an overall level of service improvement.
Since Policy 5 would maintain all existing free right turns at proposed node intersections except at
Blossom Hill Road and the only changes in free right turn movements at the Blossom Hill Road
intersection that would be allowed would either have to improve or not significantly affect overall level of
service operation, no significant impacts would result from implementation of this policy.
12
January 29, 1997
Initial Study - Los Gatos Boulevard Plan
Issues (and Supporting Information Sources)
VII. TRANSIT FACILITIES. Would the proposal result in:
a) Effects on existing transit facilities (bus and/or light rail),
or demand for new transit facilities?
b) Need for new bus routes, or alterations to the existing
system of bus routes and stops?
c) Increases in frequency of service stops made by transit
vehicles?
d) Disruption of public access to transit facilities and/or
services?
Potentially
Significant
Potentially Unless Less Than
Significant Mitigation Significant No
Impact Incorporated Impact Impact
Public Improvements Policy 6 specifies provision of transit turnouts and other improvements in the right-
of-way gained by other proposed street improvements such as narrowing travel lanes. In addition, the
Plan is intended to encourage pedestrian activity along Los Gatos Boulevard, which could indirectly
encourage transit use. Since Plan -related increased pedestrian activity could also result from those living
near Los Gatos Boulevard as well as those who have already driven to the area and parked, the increase in
transit demand is not expected to be significant.
VIII. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal result in impacts to:
a) Endangered, threatened, or rare species or their
habitats (including but not limited to plants, fish,
insects, animals, and birds)?
b) Locally designated species (e.g., heritage trees)?
c) Locally designated natural communities (e.g., oak
forest, coastal habitat, etc.)?
d) Wetland habitat (e.g., marsh, riparian, and vernal pool?
e) Wildlife dispersal or migration corridors?
Plan objectives are to increase landscaping at proposed nodes along the Boulevard. No landscape
removal is proposed as part of the Plan.
13
January 29, 1997
Initial Study - Los Gatos Boulevard Plan
Issues (and Supporting Information Sources)
Potentially
Significant
Potentially Unless Less Than
Significant Mitigation Significant No
Impact Incorporated Impact Impact
IX. ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal:
a) Conflict with adopted energy conservation plans?
b) Use non-renewable resources in a wasteful and
inefficient manner?
c) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral
resource that would be of future value to the region and
the residents of the State?
X. HAZARDS. Would the proposal involve:
a) A risk of accidental explosion or release of hazardous
substances (including, but not limited to: oil, pesticides,
chemicals, or radiation)?
b) Possible interference with an emergency response plan
or emergency evacuation plan?
c) The creation of any health hazard or potential
health hazard?
d) Exposure of people to existing sources of potential
health hazards?
e) Increased fire hazard in areas with flammable brush,
grass, or trees?
g) Subsidence of the land?
Proposed public improvements would be located within the Los Gatos Boulevard right-of-way, which is
already developed with street improvements. No change in use is proposed within the Boulevard right-of-
way, and therefore, proposed improvements would not create any new public health risks. Since surface
soils within the right-of-way are covered by existing improvements, evidence of hazardous materials
contamination could not be observed. However, street improvements generally do not involve
subsurface storage tanks or facilities that could release hazardous materials into the underlying soils or
groundwater. No building demolition would occur as part of development of public facilities within the
Boulevard right-of-way, thereby avoiding the potential for release of asbestos. Any potential public health
risks associated with development of public or private facilities on privately -owned lands adjacent to the
14
January 29, 1997
l
Initial Study - Los Gatos Boulevard Plan
Boulevard right-of-way would be evaluated on a project -specific basis when specific development
proposals are made.
Issues (and Supporting Information Sources)
XI. NOISE. Would the proposal result in:
a) Increases in existing noise levels?
b) Exposure of people to severe noise levels?
Potentially
Significant
Potentially Unless Less Than
Significant Mitigation Significant No
Impact Incorporated Impact Impact
Construction Noise. Proposed public improvements such as nodes would be located on public or private
lands at or adjacent to the following intersections with Los Gatos Boulevard: Blossom Hill Road, Los Gatos
Almaden Road, New Town/Village Square, Lark Avenue, and between Samaritan Drive and Lark Avenue.
No specific improvements are proposed along the Boulevard where residential uses are located. Project
construction would result in temporary short-term noise increases due to the operation of heavy
equipment. Although construction -related noise increases would be noticeable, potential noise impacts
on any nearby residential uses are not considered significant due to the temporary nature of construction
and intervening distances between existing residences and proposed improvements. Construction
equipment will be required to comply with the Town Noise Ordinance (Ordinance 1852, Section
11.30.035) which limits any individual piece of equipment from generating noise greater than 85 dBA at
25 feet and also limits the hours of equipment operation. Hours of equipment operation are limited to
8:00 am to 8:00 pm on weekdays and 9:00 am to 7:00 pm on weekends and holidays.
Operational Noise. Street improvements that would result from proposed Public Improvement Policies 1,
2, 4, 5, and 6 would implement the Plan's goal to reduce speeds along the Boulevard. Any reduction in
travel speeds or traffic volumes would reduce noise levels along the Boulevard. However, as discussed
under the Transportation section, a reduction in travel speeds would result in significant traffic impacts and
therefore, a reduction in noise levels would not likely occur with implementation of the Plan (assuming
Mitigation Measures 2 through 8 would be required). Therefore, traffic noise levels would not change
significantly with implementation of the proposed Plan.
Implementation of the proposed Plan is expected to result in increased pedestrian activity along the
Boulevard and at nodes or pedestrian areas. The creation of nodes or pedestrian areas where people
could congregate would introduce a new source of noise. Significant noise impacts due to disturbance of
sensitive noise receptors would not be expected to occur since proposed nodes would not be located
near or adjacent to any sensitive receptors such as residential uses.
Potential operational noise impacts associated with future private new development or redevelopment
along Los Gatos Boulevard would be evaluated on a project -specific basis at the time a specific
development proposal is made. Private Improvements Policy 3 of the proposed Plan emphasizes
minimizing "interference with the privacy, quiet, and views of surrounding residential properties."
15
January 29, 1997
initial Study - Los Gatos Boulevard Plan
Issues (and Supporting Information Sources)
Potentially
Significant
Potentially Unless Less Than
Significant Mitigation Significant No
Impact Incorporated Impact Impact
XII. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the proposal have an
effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered government
services in any of the following areas:
a) Fire protection?
b) Police protection?
c) Schools?
d) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads?
e) Other governmental services?
❑ ❑ ❑ LI
❑ ❑ ❑
❑ ❑ ❑
IJ
Services are currently provided to existing development located along Los Gatos Boulevard. The
project would not significantly increase demand for public services since services are already provided
to this area.
XII. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the
proposal result in a need for new systems or supplies,
or substantial alterations to the following utilities:
a) Power or natural gas?
b) Communications systems?
c) Local or regional water treatment or distribution facilities?
d) Sewer or septic tanks?
e) Storm water drainage?
f) Solid waste disposal?
g) Local or regional water supplies?
Utilities are currently provided to street improvements and existing development located along Los
Gatos Boulevard. No major utility improvements are expected to be required for public improvements
associated with the Plan (e.g., street furniture, landscaping, hardscape, signage for gateways). Any off -
site utility improvements associated with future private new development or redevelopment along Los
16
January 29, 1997
Initial Study - Los Gatos Boulevard Plan
Gatos Boulevard would be assessed on a project -specific basis at the time a specific development
proposal is made.
Issues (and Supporting Information Sources)
XIV. AESTHETICS. Would the proposal:
a) Affect a scenic vista or scenic highway?
b) Have a demonstrable negative aesthetic effect?
c) Create light or glare?
Potentially
Significant
Potentially Unless Less Than
Significant Mitigation Significant No
Impact Incorporated Impact Impact
❑ ❑ ❑ I::1
LI Li Li 1:1
❑ ❑ ❑ I::1
Implementation of the proposed Plan would result in development of landscaping, street furniture,
hardscape, and signage along Los Gatos Boulevard. Such improvements would have beneficial effects
on aesthetics along the Boulevard. Although such improvements could obstruct views of the distant
hills and ridgeline from southbound lanes, such interruptions in views are not considered significant
since they would be brief (only at certain intersections) as vehicles proceeded along Los Gatos
Boulevard. Also, Los Gatos Boulevard is not designated by the General Plan as a "scenic" road.
Potential aesthetic impacts associated with future private new development or redevelopment along
Los Gatos Boulevard would be evaluated on a project -specific basis at the time a specific development
proposal is made. Private Improvements Policy 3 of the proposed Plan emphasizes minimizing
"interference with the privacy, quiet, and views of surrounding residential properties."
XV. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal:
a) Disturb paleontological resources?
b) Disturb archaeological resources?
c) Affect historical resources?
d) Have the potential to cause a physical change which
would affect unique ethnic cultural values?
e) Restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the
potential impact area?
Proposed public improvements would be located within the Los Gatos Boulevard right-of-way, which is
already developed with sidewalks, curbs, gutter, street pavement, lighting, etc. Due to past surface
disturbance of the Plan Area due to street improvements and the relatively minor amount of surface
disturbance that would be required for development of Plan public improvements (e.g., nodes,
gateways), the potential for disturbance of cultural resources due to Plan implementation would be low.
17
January 29, 1997
Initial Study - Los Gatos Boulevard Plan
The potential impacts of future private new development or redevelopment along Los Gatos Boulevard
(outside the right-of-way) on cultural resources would be evaluated on a project -specific basis at the
time a specific development proposal is made.
Issues (and Supporting Information Sources)
XVI. RECREATION. Would the proposal:
a) Increase the demand for neighborhood or
regional parks or other recreational facilities?
b) Affect existing recreational opportunities?
Potentially
Significant
Potentially Unless Less Than
Significant Mitigation Significant No
Impact Incorporated Impact Impact
❑ ❑ ❑ Li
❑ ❑ ❑ I::1
The proposed Plan would not directly or indirectly increase population (beyond that specified by the
General Plan), and therefore, would not increase demand for recreational facilities.
XVII. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE.
a) Does the project have the potential to
degrade the quality of the environment,
substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or
wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife
population to drop below self sustaining
levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or
animal community, reduce the number or
restrict the range of a rare or endangered
plant or animal or eliminate important
examples of the major periods of California
history or prehistory?
b) Does the project have the potential to
achieve short-term, to the disadvantage
of long-term, environmental ones?
c) Does the project have impacts that are individually
limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively
considerable" means that the incremental effects of
a project are considerable when viewed in connection
with the effects of past projects, the effects of other
current projects, and the effects of probable future
projects.)
d) Does the project have environmental effects which
will cause substantial adverse effects on human
beings, either directly or indirectly?
18
January 29, 1997
LI DI L3 Li
Cl
NOTICE
Town of Los Gatos
Environmental Impact Review
Recommended Negative Declaration
Lead Agency: Town of Los Gatos
Planning Department
110 East Main Street
Los Gatos, CA 95031
JAN 3 1 1997
TOWN
i L' ; ,':�::�'O DEPA: - !EI1r
L -
Project Title
and Address: Los Gatos Boulevard Plan, Los Gatos Boulevard from the Route 85 interchange on the
north to Spencer Road on the south (1.8 miles)
Project
Description: The proposed Plan establishes short-, medium-, and long-range goals, policies, and
implementation measures for improvements along Los Gatos Boulevard. The overall
goals of the Plan are to preserve and project the character and history of Los Gatos
while promoting commercial activity, easy/effective access, and neighborhood
links/interfaces along the Boulevard. The Plan identifies opportunities/constraints,
goals, and policies for the following Plan objectives: Public Improvements, Gateways,
Private Improvements, Land Use, and Nodes. Plan policies that would result in physical
changes are listed as follows:
Public Improvements
Policy 1: Los Gatos Boulevard shall have six lanes of traffic (three in each direction)
from the northern Town boundary to Blossom Hill Road, then narrowing
between Blossom Hill Road and Shannon Road to four lanes of traffic (two in
each direction), then narrowing to two lanes (one in each direction) from
Shannon Road south.
Policy 2:
Policy 4:
Traffic lanes on Los Gatos Boulevard and up to one street off the Boulevard
on Blossom Hill Road shall be narrowed as much as possible while remaining
compatible with safety and traffic flow requirements.
On -street parking shall be creatively designed to coordinate the efficient flow
of motorists, pedestrians, and bicyclists. Where on -street parking is used
infrequently, the Town will consider replacing on -street parking with
landscaping and pedestrian and/or bicycle improvements, subject to
engineering analysis.
Policy 5: Free right turns shall be preserved wherever they can be safely and efficiently
designed and coordinated with nodes.
Policy 6: The right-of-way gained by the narrowing traffic lanes, redesigning on -street
parking and reconfiguring free right turn lanes shall be used for enhanced
1
EXHIBIT H
Negative Declaration - Los Gatos Boulevard Plan
driveways, transit turnouts, sidewalks, bike lanes, landscaping, nodes, and
street furniture where permitted.
Nodes
Policy 1: Each node site shall have a clearly identifiable character as reflected through
its hardscape, landscaping, and street signage.
Policy 2: Crossing surfaces, paths and signal timing shall be conducive to and
encourage pedestrian crossing and promote pedestrian and bicycle safety.
Implementation Program
Improvement 1: Nodes would be located at the following intersections: Blossom Hill
Road, Los Gatos Almaden Road, New Town/Village Square, Lark
Avenue, and between Samaritan Drive and Lark Avenue as consistent
with future development.
Land Use
Policy 2: New and relocating auto -related businesses shall be located: (a) north of Los
Gatos Almaden Road; (b) adjacent to existing auto dealerships; or (c) on a
vacant site previously used for permitted auto sales.
Policy 3: Neighborhood commercial, multi -family residential, and office uses shall be
concentrated south of Los Gatos Almaden Road.
Policy 4: Uses on Los Gatos Boulevard south of Shannon Road shall be residential or
office; existing non-residential uses would not be intensified and existing
vacant property and residential uses would developed as Single Family
Residential.
Policy 5: Commercial and mixed use development north of Lark Avenue shall be in
keeping with the Route 85 element of the General Plan and shall
provide/incorporate Boulevard, Downtown and regional transit access
accordingly.
Implementation Program
Improvement 4: Explore use of "air space" over Seven Mile Reservoir for auto storage
or recreational purposes.
Gateways
Policy 2: Gateways shall be encouraged along Los Gatos Boulevard and at other main
entrances to Town.
Implementation Program
Improvement 1: Locate a gateway at Samaritan Drive.
2
Negative Declaration - Los Gatos Boulevard Plan
Private Improvements
Policy 3: Proposals shall be designed to minimize interference with the privacy, quiet,
and views of surrounding residential properties.
Policy 6: Pedestrian access to buildings and sites shall be encouraged.
Determination: Although implementation of the proposed Los Gatos Boulevard Plan could have a
significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case
because the mitigation measures described below have been incorporated into the
proposed Plan. An Environmental Impact Report will not be required.
Statement of Reasons to Support Finding:
1. Land Use/
Planning:
This section of Los Gatos Boulevard is designated as an "Arterial" road. The General
Plan defines arterial streets as streets that serve a large volume of vehicular traffic with
intersections at grade and generally having direct access to abutting property, and on
which geometric design and traffic control measures are used to expedite the safe
movement of through traffic. Arterials are designed to facilitate two or more lanes of
moving traffic in each direction. Arterials may be divided by a median island which
controls left turns and provides lanes for left -turn movements. The General Plan also
specifies the following road improvements for Los Gatos Boulevard:
(3) LOS GATOS BOULEVARD
Samaritan Drive to Camino del Sol: Widen the road to 6 lanes with median and parking
and to 4 lanes with median, bike lanes, and parking.
Nino Avenue to Spencer Avenue: Improve the circulation along this portion by
widening the road to 4 lanes with median, bike lanes, sidewalks and parking.
The proposed Plan would not alter this designation. The proposed changes for Los
Gatos Boulevard would not conflict with this designation since the objective of the
proposed Plan is to maintain safe, smooth, and efficient traffic flows. However, the
effects of specified improvements on traffic flows are discussed below under Section
VI, Transportation/Circulation. Public Improvements Policy 1 specifies development
of six lanes from the northern Town boundary to Blossom Hill Road, narrowing to four
lanes between Blossom Hill Road and Shannon Road, then narrowing to two lanes
from Shannon Road south. The proposed Plan would not be consistent with the
above General Plan policy for the section of the Boulevard between Nino Avenue
and Spencer Avenue, which calls for four lanes where the proposed Plan specifies
two lanes. In addition, it is not clear whether the proposed Plan improvements
specified for the section of Los Gatos Boulevard near the northern Town boundary,
(proposed to be six lanes), is entirely consistent with the six and four lane
improvements specified in the General Plan for this section of the Boulevard. To
resolve this inconsistency, the following measure will be implemented:
Mitigation: The General Plan will be revised as follows:
3
Negative Declaration - Los Gatos Boulevard Plan
"(3) Samaritan Drive to Camino del Sol: Widen the road to 6 lanes with median,
on -street parking and bike lanes."
The General Plan will also be amended to specify a consistent number of lanes for
Los Gatos Boulevard between the northern Town boundary and Spencer Avenue.
Mitigation
Monitoring: The Planning Department will be responsible for ensuring that the General Plan is
changed accordingly.
Land Use Policies 2 through 5 emphasize location of: (1) new auto -related
businesses generally north of Los Gatos Almaden Road, adjacent to existing auto
dealerships, or on a vacant site previously used for permitted auto sales; (2)
neighborhood commercial, multi -family residential, and office uses south of Los Gatos
Almaden Road; (3) residential or office uses south of Shannon Road (existing non-
residential uses would not be intensified and existing vacant property would
developed as single-family residential); and (4) commercial and mixed use
development north of Lark Avenue (in keeping with the Route 85 Element of the
General Plan). Implementation Program Land Use Improvement 4 specifies
exploration of auto storage or recreational uses in the "air space" over Seven Mile
Reservoir.
Proposed uses would be consistent with the General Plan land use designations
along Los Gatos Boulevard. For the northern section of Los Gatos Boulevard,
proposed Policy 5 specifies consistency with land use designations of the Route 85
Element of the General Plan (1993), which supersedes land use designations
contained in the General Plan Land Use Plan (1991). Proposed Policy 2 would be
consistent with the General Plan "Mixed Use Commercial" land use designation for
the section of the Boulevard between Lark Avenue and Los Gatos Almaden Road.
Proposed Policy 3 would also be generally consistent with the mixed use commercial
and residential General Plan designations along Los Gatos Boulevard south of Los
Gatos Almaden Road. The General Plan designates residential and school uses
along the section of Los Gatos Boulevard south of Shannon Road, and proposed
Policy 4 would be consistent with these designations since existing non-residential
uses would not be intensified. The General Plan and Zoning Ordinance designate
the Seven Mile Reservoir property for low density residential uses, which would not
necessarily allow for auto storage or recreational uses. However, Improvement 4
specifies exploration by the Town of the "air space" over Seven Mile Reservoir for
auto storage or recreational purposes, and no specific use is proposed. Therefore,
this improvement does not directly conflict with the General Plan land use designation
for this property. Before any specific use can approved for the air space over the
reservoir, a General Plan amendment would be required if it is found to be
inconsistent with the existing land use designation.
2. Population: Land Use Policy 4 of the proposed Plan specifies that uses on Los Gatos Boulevard
south of Shannon Road would be residential or office, with no intensification of
existing non-residential uses and development of existing vacant property and
residential uses as single-family residential. The proposed Plan would be consistent
with the Land Use Element of the General Plan, which specifies low -density (0-5 units
per acre) and medium -density (5-12 units per acre) residential uses along this section
of the Boulevard. Such residential densities would allow for single-family detached or
4
Negative Declaration - Los Gatos Boulevard Plan
attached residential units. Since the proposed Plan would be consistent with the
General Plan, it would not pose any significant changes to anticipated growth in this
area of Los Gatos. Since the Plan does not alter existing General Plan designations
along Los Gatos Boulevard, the proposed Plan would not induce new growth or
encourage intensification of existing land uses. Land Use policies of the proposed
Plan provide guidelines for redevelopment along the Boulevard, which is already
mostly developed. No existing housing would be removed by the proposed Plan.
3. Geology: The Los Gatos General Plan Seismic Safety Element1 indicates the project site is
located within an area identified as having "moderate -to -minor geotechnical hazard."
Los Gatos Boulevard traverses the Shannon Fault Zone south of Lark Avenue. Other
than street improvements (restriping, changes in lane striping, curb changes, street
furniture, landscaping, etc.) no new development would occur directly as a result of
implementation the proposed Plan. Such improvements would be required to be
constructed to building code standards, and would not be subject to any unique
geotechnical constraints. Any new public or private development that would occur
along Los Gatos Boulevard would be subject to seismic hazards similar to other
existing development in the project area. Specific private development projects
would be subject to Town requirements for preparation of project -specific soil
engineering and geotechnical studies at the time a specific development proposal is
made.
4. Water:
Street improvements that are specified in proposed Plan policies would be located in
areas that are already developed or covered by impervious surfaces. Therefore, Plan
implementation would not result in any significant change in existing drainage
conditions or peak flow volumes. In addition, proposed Nodes would involve
development of small areas, which would not significantly alter peak flow volumes.
The introduction of new landscaped areas could result in a minor reduction in
impervious surfaces, which would slightly reduce surface runoff volumes. Any new
development or redevelopment along Los Gatos Boulevard that occurs in
accordance with Land Use policies of the Plan would be evaluated on a project -
specific basis for specific changes in surface runoff volumes and storm drainage
requirements.
5. Air Quality: Implementation of the proposed Plan would not generate any new traffic. However,
as noted in the Transportation/Circulation section below, any improvements which
result in reduced travel speeds or impairment of the Boulevard's function as an arterial
could result in more congestion along the Boulevard and traffic could divert to other
parallel corridors. Reduced travel speeds would result in an incremental increase in
vehicular air pollutant emissions. Emissions could be further increased if vehicles are
forced to idle longer due to traffic congestion. In addition, if traffic diverted to other
parallel corridors, traffic increases along those corridors would result in localized
increases in air pollutant emissions. The significance of these local and regional
emissions increases would depend on the degree of travel speed reduction and the
amount of traffic diverted to other parallel corridors. However, implementation of
Mitigation Measure #2 below would reduce the potential for these increased
emissions to a less -than -significant level.
1 Town of Los Gatos, 1985. Town of Los Gatos General Plan Seismic Safety Element, Geologic
Hazards, Map No. 126. February 4.
5
Negative Declaration - Los Gatos Boulevard Plan
6. Transportation/
Circulation: Proposed Public Improvement Policies 1, 2, 4, 5, and 6 specify: (1) narrowing of
traffic lanes on Los Gatos Boulevard and up to one street off the Boulevard on
Blossom Hill Road (while remaining compatible with safety and traffic flow
requirements); (2) design of on -street parking to allow for the efficient flow of
motorists, pedestrians and bicyclists, or elimination of on -street parking where it is
used infrequently; (3) preservation of free right turns wherever they can be safety and
efficiently designed and coordinated with nodes; and (4) use of the right-of-way
gained by the above improvements shall be used for enhanced driveways, transit
turnouts, sidewalks, bike lanes, landscaping, nodes, and street furniture where
permitted.
A traffic study was prepared by the Town Traffic Engineer in December 1996, and a
copy of this study is on file at the Los Gatos Planning Department. It focused on five
specific elements of the proposed Plan: (1) arterial function; (2) lane width; (3) street
section transition; (4) parking elimination; and (5) free right -turn movements. Study
findings are summarized as follows:
Arterial Function. Public Improvement Goal 1 is "To reduce travel speeds along the
Boulevard through design improvements, while maintaining a safe, smooth and
efficient flow for both local and through traffic including emergency vehicles." Los
Gatos Boulevard currently functions as an arterial street, connecting high volumes of
high speed traffic from collector streets and the downtown area to the SR 85 freeway
and the neighboring cities of San Jose, Campbell, and Santa Clara. Based on the
assumption that the intent of Goal 1 is not to reduce travel speeds to below the
posted speed limit, this Goal would not result in any significant change in traffic
conditions. Higher travel speeds typically occur when volumes are low enough to
allow free flow of traffic, whereas slower travel speeds occur along the Boulevard
during peak traffic periods. Therefore, reducing travel speeds to the existing speed
limit would occur primarily during the non -peak traffic periods and would not affect
operations during the more congested, peak traffic periods. It should be noted,
however, that implementation of the design improvements listed in this report are not
intended to slow travel speeds, but would minimize the identified potential effects of
traffic diversions and traffic safety problems.
If travel speeds along the Boulevard were reduced to below the speed limit (which is
assumed to not be the intent of Goal 1), the ability of the street to function as an
arterial would be correspondingly impaired. This, in turn, could produce a variety of
results. Significant volumes of traffic could divert to parallel corridors, such as
Winchester Boulevard, University Avenue, or the SR 17 Freeway. The potential
impact on these corridors would depend on the degree to which traffic is impeded on
Los Gatos Boulevard. Considering that the alternative routes would not serve as
desirable substitutes, it is possible that traffic along the Boulevard would resist
attempts to reduce the corridor speed. Depending on the corridor modifications
made, this could lead to an increased collision rate, caused by portions of the traffic
stream that attempt to continue navigating the corridor at high speed. The
significance of the impacts associated with meeting this Plan goal would depend on
the degree that travel speeds were reduced by the proposed design improvements.
Lane Width. Implementation of Public Improvement Policy 2 would narrow lane
widths to reduce speeds and provide additional right-of-way for pedestrian areas and
6
Negative Declaration - Los Gatos Boulevard Plan
other public improvements. Minor adjustment to existing lane widths would not
significantly affect speed or safety. Although the existing lane widths of 12 feet are
considered standard and are the most desirable from a safety and liability perspective,
a reduction to 11 feet may not cause significant problems. Another consideration
would be to provide wider outside lanes with narrower inside lanes. A 12-foot/11-
foot/12-foot section would reduce right-of-way needs while maintaining standard lane
widths adjacent to vertical obstructions (e.g., curbs, gutters, poles, trees,
pedestrians, etc.). To ensure that safety problems are not created or travel speeds
are not reduced, the following measure shall be required:
Mitigation: Pursuant to Public Improvement Policy 2, the Implementation Program shall specify
that lane width reduction along Los Gatos Boulevard be limited to 11 feet to maintain
traffic safety and travel speeds.
Mitigation
Monitoring: The Planning Department will be responsible for ensuring that the Los Gatos
Boulevard Plan is changed accordingly. The Engineering Department will be
responsible for ensuring that these standards are properly implemented when
specific improvement plans are developed.
Street Section Transition. The proposed Plan provides for two-, four-, and six -lane
sections. Each transition between these sections consists of one transition in each
direction, with the transition from a wider section to a narrower section being much
longer than the transition from a narrower section to a wider section. To maintain
traffic safety, the following measure shall be required:
Mitigation: Pursuant to Public Improvement Policy 1, the Implementation Program shall specify
that lane drop transitions between two-, four-, and six -lane sections be designed in
accordance with the Caltrans Traffic Design Manual to the extent possible, with total
transition area comprising approximately 1,000-1,500 feet, with the pavement
transition itself occurring over approximately 300-500 feet.
Mitigation: Pursuant to Public Improvement Policy 1, the Implementation Program shall specify
that the southbound transition from four to two lanes shall occur north of Nino
Avenue and not in front of Van Meter School.
Mitigation
Monitoring The Planning Department will be responsible for ensuring that the Los Gatos
Boulevard Plan is changed accordingly. The Engineering Department will be
responsible for ensuring that these standards are properly implemented when
specific improvement plans are developed.
Parking Elimination. Implementation of Public Improvement Policy 3 would result in
the prohibition of on -street parking along some sections of the Boulevard to provide
more space for public improvements (landscaping, pedestrian areas). In general,
such parking prohibition should improve traffic flow and safety, because it would
eliminate conflicts between flowing traffic and vehicles making parking/unparking
maneuvers. No significant adverse impacts are anticipated from implementation of
Public Improvement Policy 3 assuming the following measures are implemented as
part of this policy:
7
Negative Declaration - Los Gatos Boulevard Plan
Mitigation: Pursuant to Public Improvement Policy 3, the Implementation Program shall specify
the following:
• Modifications to the parking lane area shall not adversely affect travel lane
alignment. If travel lane alignment is modified, appropriate transition must be
provided.
• Modifications to the parking lane area shall not adversely affect bike lanes. Bike
lane width adjacent to curbs/gutters are generally wider than those next to parking
lanes. Also, bike lane transitions must not be too abrupt. Finally, irrigation for
proposed landscaped areas shall be designed so as not to overspray into the bike
lane.
• A landscaping buffer zone will be installed between the curb and sidewalk
wherever the parking lane is removed since removal of the parking lane area will
result in curbs being closer to the travel lanes.
• At all proposed nodes and landscaped/pedestrian areas where landscaping and
street furniture would be provided, all improvements shall be designed so as not
to create sight distance problems for traffic or pedestrians.
Mitigation
Monitoring: The Planning Department will be responsible for ensuring that the Los Gatos
Boulevard Plan is changed accordingly. The Engineering Department will be
responsible for ensuring that these standards are properly implemented when
specific improvement plans are developed.
Free Right Turn Movements. Public Improvement Policy 5 calls for the preservation
of free right turns wherever they can be safely and efficiently designed and
coordinated with nodes. Nodes are proposed at the following Los Gatos Boulevard
intersections: Blossom Hill Road, Los Gatos Almaden Road, New Town/Village
Square, Lark Avenue, and between Samaritan Drive and Lark Avenue as consistent
with future development. The traffic study only examined potential changes at the
Blossom Hill Road intersection because this is the only node intersection where free
right turns would be eliminated under the proposed Plan. Free right turns would be
maintained at all other node intersections, consistent with Policy 5. Several
alternatives were considered in the traffic study and the study concluded that the
least expensive way to make the Los Gatos Boulevard/Blossom Hill Road intersection
more "pedestrian friendly" would be to reduce the width of the free right turn lanes
and enlarge the triangular islands. However, right-of-way acquisition and corner
widening would be necessary to safely facilitate 55-foot trucks. The free right turns
and islands could also be eliminated without reducing the level of service to an
unacceptable level. In fact, construction of a westbound right -turn lane, with
northbound, southbound, and westbound right -turn overlap phasing, would
represent an overall level of service improvement. Since Policy 5 would maintain all
existing free right turns at proposed node intersections except at Blossom Hill Road
and the only changes in free right turn movements at the Blossom Hill Road
intersection that would be allowed would either have to improve or not significantly
affect overall level of service operation, no significant impacts would result from
implementation of this policy.
8
Negative Declaration - Los Gatos Boulevard Plan
7. Transit
Facilities: Public Improvements Policy 6 specifies provision of transit turnouts and other
improvements in the right-of-way gained by other proposed street improvements
such as narrowing travel lanes. In addition, the Plan is intended to encourage
pedestrian activity along Los Gatos Boulevard, which could indirectly encourage
transit use. Since Plan -related increased pedestrian activity could also result from
those living near Los Gatos Boulevard as well as those who have already driven to the
area and parked, the increase in transit demand is not expected to be significant.
8. Biological
Resources: Plan objectives are to increase landscaping at proposed nodes along the Boulevard.
No landscape removal is proposed as part of the Plan.
9. Hazards: Proposed public improvements would be located within the Los Gatos Boulevard
right-of-way, which is already developed with street improvements. No change in use
is proposed within the Boulevard right-of-way, and therefore, proposed
improvements would not create any new public health risks. Since surface soils within
the right-of-way are covered by existing improvements, evidence of hazardous
materials contamination could not be observed. However, street improvements
generally do not involve subsurface storage tanks or facilities that could release
hazardous materials into the underlying soils or groundwater. No building demolition
would occur as part of development of public facilities within the Boulevard right-of-
way, thereby avoiding the potential for release of asbestos. Any potential public
health risks associated with development of public or private facilities on privately -
owned lands adjacent to the Boulevard right-of-way would be evaluated on a project -
specific basis when specific development proposals are made.
10. Noise: Construction Noise. Proposed public improvements such as nodes would be located
on public or private lands at or adjacent to the following intersections with Los Gatos
Boulevard: Blossom Hill Road, Los Gatos Almaden Road, New Town/Village Square,
Lark Avenue, and between Samaritan Drive and Lark Avenue. No specific
improvements are proposed along the Boulevard where residential uses are located.
Project construction would result in temporary short-term noise increases due to the
operation of heavy equipment. Although construction -related noise increases would
be noticeable, potential noise impacts on any nearby residential uses are not
considered significant due to the temporary nature of construction and intervening
distances between existing residences and proposed improvements. Construction
equipment will be required to comply with the Town Noise Ordinance (Ordinance
1852, Section 11.30.035) which limits any individual piece of equipment from
generating noise greater than 85 dBA at 25 feet and also limits the hours of
equipment operation. Hours of equipment operation are limited to 8:00 am to 8:00
pm on weekdays and 9:00 am to 7:00 pm on weekends and holidays.
Operational Noise. Street improvements that would result from proposed Public
Improvement Policies 1, 2, 4, 5, and 6 would implement the Plan's goal to reduce
speeds along the Boulevard. Any reduction in travel speeds or traffic volumes would
reduce noise levels along the Boulevard. However, as discussed under the
Transportation section, a reduction in travel speeds would result in significant traffic
impacts and therefore, a reduction in noise levels would not likely occur with
implementation of the Plan (assuming Mitigation Measures 2 through 8 would be
9
Negative Declaration - Los Gatos Boulevard Plan
required). Therefore, traffic noise levels would not change significantly with
implementation of the proposed Plan.
Implementation of the proposed Plan is expected to result in increased pedestrian
activity along the Boulevard and at nodes or pedestrian areas. The creation of nodes
or pedestrian areas where people could congregate would introduce a new source of
noise. Significant noise impacts due to disturbance of sensitive noise receptors
would not be expected to occur since proposed nodes would not be located near or
adjacent to any sensitive receptors such as residential uses.
Potential operational noise impacts associated with future private new development
or redevelopment along Los Gatos Boulevard would be evaluated on a project -
specific basis at the time a specific development proposal is made. Private
Improvements Policy 3 of the proposed Plan emphasizes minimizing "interference
with the privacy, quiet, and views of surrounding residential properties."
11. Public
Services: Services are currently provided to existing development located along Los Gatos
Boulevard. The project would not significantly increase demand for public services
since services are already provided to this area.
12. Utilities/Service
Systems: Services are currently provided to existing development located along Los Gatos
Boulevard. The project would not significantly increase demand for public services
since services are already provided to this area. Utilities are currently provided to
street improvements and existing development located along Los Gatos Boulevard.
No major utility improvements are expected to be required for public improvements
associated with the Plan (e.g., street furniture, landscaping, hardscape, signage for
gateways). Any off -site utility improvements associated with future private new
development or redevelopment along Los Gatos Boulevard would be assessed on a
project -specific basis at the time a specific development proposal is made.
13. Aesthetics: Implementation of the proposed Plan would result in development of landscaping,
street furniture, hardscape, and signage along Los Gatos Boulevard. Such
improvements would have beneficial effects on aesthetics along the Boulevard.
Although such improvements could obstruct views of the distant hills and ridgeline
from southbound lanes, such interruptions in views are not considered significant
since they would be brief (only at certain intersections) as vehicles proceeded along
Los Gatos Boulevard. Also, Los Gatos Boulevard is not designated by the General
Plan as a "scenic" road.
Potential aesthetic impacts associated with future private new development or
redevelopment along Los Gatos Boulevard would be evaluated on a project -specific
basis at the time a specific development proposal is made. Private Improvements
Policy 3 of the proposed Plan emphasizes minimizing "interference with the privacy,
quiet, and views of surrounding residential properties."
14. Cultural
Resources: Proposed public improvements would be located within the Los Gatos Boulevard
right-of-way, which is already developed with sidewalks, curbs, gutter, street
pavement, lighting, etc. Due to past surface disturbance of the Plan Area due to
10
Negative Declaration - Los Gatos Boulevard Plan
street improvements and the relatively minor amount of surface disturbance that
would be required for development of Plan elements (e.g., nodes, gateways, public
improvements), the potential for disturbance of cultural resources due to Plan
implementation would be low. The potential impacts of future private new
development or redevelopment along Los Gatos Boulevard (outside the right-of-way)
on cultural resources would be evaluated on a project -specific basis at the time a
specific development proposal is made.
15. Recreation: The proposed Plan would not directly or indirectly increase population (beyond that
specified by the General Plan), and therefore, would not increase demand for
recreational facilities.
Copies of the Initial Study used to make the above recommendation are on file and available for public
inspection during regular business hours at the Town Planning Department, 110 East Main Street, Los
Gatos, California.
Date Lee E. Bowman, Planning Director
11
SEE THE FUTURE
BOULEVARD
YOUR INPUT IS NEEDED
ON THE LOS GATOS BOULEVARD PLAN !
If you have interest in the future development along Los Gatos Boulevard, you will
want to attend a public forum to review the Draft Boulevard Plan.
•
WHEN: TUESDAY, MAY 28,1996
7:00 PM - 9:30 PM
WHERE: LOS GATOS NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER
208 East Main Street
In November 1994 the Town of Los Gatos conducted an all day Charette, a
brainstorming event held to generate development goals and concept plans for the
Boulevard. In February 1995, the Town held a follow-up forum. Among the
participants were Boulevard business owners, architects, students and area residents.
As a result of the Charette, the Town of Los Gatos has drafted a Streetscape Plan and
Goals, Policies and Implementation measures for Boulevard development. The Plan
shows improvements to be made to Los Gatos Boulevard from Samaritan Drive to
Spencer Avenue. The Goals, Policies and Implementation Measures include:
1. Gateways to the Town and Los Gatos Boulevard.
2. Pedestrian friendly orientation of public and private development.
3. Node locations identified for pedestrian activity centers.
4. Transition of high to low intensity uses from north to south on the Boulevard.
PLEASE JOIN US TO REVIEW AND COMMENT ON THE DRAFT PLANS FOR
THE BOULEVARD!
For more information contact: The Planning Department (408)354-6874
EXHIBIT
ATTACHMENT 4
PUBLIC COMMENTS FROM
5/28/96 MEETING
1. No Park and Ride Lots
2. How will Town finance public
improvements?
3. Consider impact of commercial
development on residential property
values.
4. Concern about "elimination" of free
right turns on the Boulevard related to
truck traffic and diversion of traffic to
residential streets.
5. Concern about nodes located at
corners; effect of auto exhaust from idling
cars.
6. Town should improve sidewalk
conditions and construct sidewalk where
none currently exists.
7. It is unsafe for pedestrians to share
driveways with cars and walk through
parking lots with no sidewalks.
8. If there is a problem with speeding on
the Boulevard, enforce the speed limit.
9. The purpose of the Boulevard is to
move traffic to and from Lark Avenue,
HWY 17 and HWY 85.
TOWN RESPONSES
Not included in Plan
Require new development to make frontage
improvements; Future State or Federal
Grants; Town Capital Improvement Program
The Town encourages redevelopment and
improvement of commercial property. This
will maintain and increase residential
property values. Vacant and deteriorated
commercial properties lead to a decline in
residential property values.
All free right turns existing on or onto the
Boulevard will remain, except the at
Blossom Hill Road. See Figure 4 concept
plan for proposed right turn configuration.
This alternative was recommended by a
Traffic Engineer.
Committee considered this, and not all
nodes are located at corners. One is to be
located between Lark Avenue and Samaritan
Drive, pending future development.
Sidewalk repair and/ or replacement is
required for new development. The Town
can include sidewalk construction in the CIP
if right-of-way is dedicated.
The Design Standards address pedestrian
orientation and providing pedestrian
circulation through parking lots.
The Police Department has placed the speed
trailer on the Boulevard, most frequently in
the Van Meter School area. Speed
enforcement is aggressive and ongoing.
Los Gatos Boulevard will remain an arterial
street. Proposed improvements have been
reviewed by a Traffic Engineer and will not ._
impact capacity.
�a
SEE THE FUTURE
BOULEVARD
YOUR INPUT IS NEEDED
ON THE LOS GATOS BOULEVARD PLAN !
WHEN: WEDNESDAY, JUNE 18, 1997
7:30 PM - 9:30 PM
WHERE: TOWN COUNCIL CHAMBERS
110 East Main Street
In November 1994 the Town of Los Gatos conducted an all day Charette, a
brainstorming event held to generate development goals and concept plans for the
Boulevard. In February 1995, the Town held a follow-up forum. Among the
participants were Boulevard business owners, architects, students and area residents.
In May 1996, a public meeting was held to review the Los Gatos Boulevard Plan and
Design Standards. After this meeting, the text was edited and graphics were created.
Based on public input from all of the previous public meetings, the Town of Los
Gatos has drafted the Los Gatos Boulevard Plan and Design Standards. The Draft
Plan shows improvements to be made to Los Gatos Boulevard from Samaritan Drive
to Spencer Avenue. The Plan includes:
1. Gateways
2. Pedestrian Oriented Development.
3. Land Use
4. Public Improvements
5. Architectural Standards
PLEASE JOIN US TO REVIEW AND COMMENT ON THE DRAFT LOS
GATOS BOULEVARD PLAN AND DESIGN STANDARDS!
For more information contact: The Los Gatos Planning Department (408)354-6872
EXHIBIT
PUBLIC COMMENTS FROM SPECIAL MEETING OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION, GENERAL
PLAN COMMITTEE AND ARCHITECTURAL STANDARDS COMMITTEE
Meeting Purpose: To present Draft Los Gatos Boulevard Plan and Design Standards to the Public
June 18, 1997
1. Draft Los Gatos Boulevard Plan
No incentive for businesses to create node included in the Plan. Should there be one?
• Consider allowing additional floor area if node is included
• Maybe include percentage of landscape required for site to be part of node
► No signs should be allowed in node area
Pedestrian friendly concept? Where did it come from?
• Try to make it a pleasant place to walk, particularly for pedestrian access from residential areas
surrounding the Boulevard
► Businesses are "destination" type which do not generate pedestrian traffic
The Plan should make a distinction between a built social gathering place versus a place to move
people. Which is priority?
People from Downtown area drive to Boulevard
Informal poll - People want to "move" on Boulevard not stroll
Concerned about secondary streets and access to Boulevard becoming congested
At node, people would rather not see imposing buildings
2. Los Gatos Boulevard Design Standards
Concern regarding mixed use with residential and professional over retail. Traffic, height, parking, etc.
From Lark Avenue north- property needs beautification
Concern of traffic intensifiying with improvements
Lane transition: school zones/ safety should be first priority
ALLGBLVDI6-18PUB.COM
EXIIIB!T L
NOVEMBER 2, 1994 LOS GATOS WEEKLY-T1MES 9
VOLUME 114, NUMBER 13
Los GATOS, CALIFORNIA
NOVEMBER 2, 199'
Freedman forum attracts 200
By TRACY PALAZZO
Asked how they would spell
relief on Oct. 27, some 200 Los
Gatans said. "Michael Freedman."
Residents and business owners
long disheartened by Los Gatos
Boulevard's uninspired look left
the Michael Freedman Forum light
of heart and inspired for the future
of the boulevard. The town of Los
Gatos hired Freedman, a noted
architect and urban designer, to
;hare his experience and visions as
Dart of beginning a strategy to turn
.he boulevard into a more aesthet-
cally pleasing area.
inspired." said Leonard
'a. , a Los Gatos resident and
iesigner for Santa Clara County .
vho attended the forum. "I like that
ie didn't give us a formula for how
o design our town but encouraged
s to design our own. He really got
De wheels spinning."
Freedman's lecture and accom-
anving slide show focused on the
otential of wide roads such as the
oulevard. and ran the gamut of
rban design compilations, from
rategic locations for large or small
ees to avoiding strip development.
Freedman responded to ques-
Dns that included boulevard com-
;tition with the downtown. "You
in decide, before you let any
weloper come in. what business -
you will and will not allow on the
)uJevard," Freedman said. "You
ay decide you want to keep all ser-
ves in the downtown, so you won't
[ow any dry _ cleaning or
irstvlists on the boulevard."
He also spoke candidly about his
;dain for some urban design.
"You don't want multifamily hous-
ing that looks like cheap motels,"
he said. "That's what a lot of Amer-
ican communities have today."
His slides included lessons to be
learned from once -thriving cities
turned to slums because too many
businesses were permitted for the
area. One slide, for instance,
showed unicolored tract houses,
flanked by wood chips and encased
in brown fencing.
"He showed us what's out there,
and what we want to avoid,"
Pacheco said. "But he also showed
us that if we keep our boulevard
clean and well enhanced. the prop-
erty value will only go up."
CouncilmemberJoanne Benjamin
attended the forum, which was spon-
sored by the Community Boulevard
Alliance. and said the $2.000 of town
funding for Freedman's consulting
services was well spent. "I know that
some people feared they weren't
going to be a part of the design pro-
cess," Benjamin said. "I think this is
just what Los Gatans needed to know
that the public is an essential part of
the design process."
Many in the audience said the
forum heightened their interest in
attending the upcoming Nov.12 all -
day design forum, which is also
sponsored by the Community
Boulevard Alliance. That forum
will be hosted by members of the
American Institute of Architects.
Residents and business owners will
join design teams lead by AIA
architects. Twice during the day,
design teams will present ideas to
the entire group. Those who cannot
attend the full day are encouraged
Photograph oy Edmund Let
Michael Freedman inspired an audience of some 200 to savor the
challenge of remaking Los Gatos Boulevard.
to visit at their leisure. Everyone will
have opportunities to witness the
teams at work and voice concerns.
Scheduled for the same day is the
"Built Environment Education
Program." which allows children to
participate. The town is funding
both events with $13,000. which was
pooled from reserves of the Los
Gatos Business Fund. The event
will take place 8 a.m-7 p.m. at the
Calvary Baptist Church, located at
16330 Los Gatos Blvd.
Questions should be addressed to
Kirk Heinrichs of the Los Gatos
Planning Department at 354-6879.
t
Charette provided
power to the people
he$13,000 that the town of Los Gatos
invested in a two-part visionary exploration
of Los Gatos Boulevard was money well
spent. On Oct. 27, some 200 people turned
out to hear noted architect and urban
planner Michael Freedman share his experience and
visions. On Nov. 12, Los Gatans rolled up their
sleeves and got to work at the daylong charette, a
�, design forum.
hlIij t�� 6:14,S Bol �,
deserves credit for
pushing through the notion that the boulevard —now
the gateway to the town, thanks to the Highway 85
interchange —deserves serious attention.
In spite of recent efforts to beautify and enhance
the boulevard with such projects as the Cornerstone
Shopping Center, the boulevard still has that
unplanned look that characterized 1960s urban
sprawl throughout Santa Clara Valley. Residents,
business people and town officials who participated
in the design forum were in agreement that the time
had finally come for thoughtful urban planning.
That's what happened at the design forum. Not
every idea offered will become part of the final plan,
but people in attendance believe that their ideas
matter and that they will be given -careful
consideration. Those who love theater put a theater
in their plan, while skateboard aficionados advocated
for a skateboard park. Why not?
Instead of offering a coloring book and as
king -
participants to stay within the lines, the town said:
"Do your own thing."
Not only did this effort lay the groundwork for the
future of a boulevard that might some day rival the
Champs Elysee in Paris, it empowered the people, a
1960s notion with a lot more staying power than
unplanned urban sprawl.
EXHIBIT N
LC
11=Ve/ 12-e /M 9,1
r
RECEii, 1997
/bD 297 CarltonAugust4Way
Los Gatos CA 95032
AUG 0 41997 356-3848
TOWN OF LOs GATOS
Members of the Town Planning Commission: PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Meeting on August 13, 1997 Sy
Re: Los Gatos Boulevard Plan and Design Standards
Since before and after the announcement of a vision to improve the boulevard, I have
probably invested as much or more time than any other citizen -volunteer toward
improvement of Los Gatos Boulevard. I participated in the Design Charrette, General
Plan Committee meetings and represented my neighborhood in a successful campaign
to locate an attractive Office Depot on the boulevard.
I spent hundreds of hours communicating with my neighborhood and leading a
neighborhood campaign to insure the successful location of an attractive Office Depot
complex on the boulevard. I traveled hundreds of miles to visit other cities to examine
the architecture of other Office Depot buildings. I spent many days on the boulevard
circulating petitions and talking to business owners and managers about the future
Office Depot complex. Contrary to what you may have read in the newspaper at the
time, the significant design improvements that were imposed on Office Depot were
negotiated by myself and my neighborhood with Office Depot's architects. I also
represented my neighborhood at the Development Review Committee level as a result
of my neighborhood's campaign to create an attractive building adjacent to
neighboring homes. The Office Depot plans that the Planning Commission and the
Town Council eventually saw were plans that had already gone through significant
change. Changes to the Office Depot's plans imposed at the Planning Commission and
Town Council level were secondary.
Many times I felt my conservative views on the boulevard plan were not always
appreciated by some members of the General Plan Committee. My approach to the
boulevard plan was pragmatic because I understood the limitations of the physical
parameters from the very beginning. The committee would have inevitably reached
the same conclusion. However, my pragmatism undoubtedly caused them to reach
conclusions and complete the boulevard plan much faster than they would have
otherwise.
The Boulevard Plan and Design Standards are more than a vision, they are a
necessity! If the boulevard is to remain economically viable, it must be able to
continue attracting consumers. Shopping areas like the revitalized Pacific Avenue in
Santa Cruz and the Pruneyard Shopping Center in Campbell prove that shopping
areas lacking vitality can be revitalized and re -attract consumers. Today's consumer
likes to shop in attractive settings. Other surrounding communities have already
realized the importance of attractive architecture and streetscapes in competing for
consumers. For example, several years ago Mountain View took steps to revitalize
Castro Street and San Jose is presently making improvements to San Carlos Street.
7,..!.1.3' 0
:14r' .
The concept of the boulevard plan has already born fruit in the Office Depot complex,
the Hollywood Video and Crown Bookstore complex, the SpeeDee Oil Change building,
and the new Chevrolet truck building. However, a community is more than the design
and development or redevelopment of boulevards, streets, retail and commercial
buildings. Communities exist for the benefit of their residents. Communities, their
representatives, committees, commissions and councils do not exist solely for the
purpose of hearing developers or improving the infrastructure to enhance the value of
assets owned by commercial property owners at the expense of taxpayers.
Communities exist for the mutual benefit of their residents.
The inception of the boulevard plan promised a mutual beneficial relationship between
commercial and adjacent residential property owners. However, the boulevard plan
due to the subject matter, its length and narrow scope is heavily biased in favor of
the interests of commercial developers and property owners. In fact the protection
originally promised at the conception of the boulevard plan to protect the interests of
residential property owners adjacent to commercial property development has been
revised and diluted down to only a few weak sentences. Mayor Benjamin stated to
me at one of the General Plan Committee meetings that, if necessary, the Town Council
would in fact insure that the boulevard plan provided adequate protection for
residents living adjacent to commercial or retail development on the boulevard.
Hopefully the Planning Commission will not necessitate the Town Council's action on this
matter.
We should remember that the entire approval process is heavily biased toward the
interests of the developer. During every phase of the approval process the developer
dominates the input heard by the body that approves the developer's plans. The
Planning Department, committees, commissions and council spend hundreds if not
thousands of combined mai-hours being influenced by a developer. Residents
affected by the development, in the end, are allowed only a few minutes to address
brief comments to the various committees, commissions and councils. The developers
will take their profits and leave town. We, the residents, will be forced to live with the
consequences of their profit motives for better or for worse.
In conclusion, I generally support the Boulevard Plan and Design Standards provided
that adequate protections and specific terminology are included in the plan to protect
the quality of life and the property values of residents living adjacent to commercial
development.
Sinc� ,
Larry Paulding
Copy: All members of the Town Council
REPORT TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
FINDINGS:
ACTION:
ENVIRONMENTAL
ASSESSMENT:
EXHIBITS:
RECOMMENDATION
SUMMARY:
A. REMARKS:
Date: August 7, 1997
For Agenda Of: August 13, 1997
Agenda Item: 8
ADDENDUM
The Planning Commission
The General Plan Committee and Architectural Standards/ Hillside Committee
Los Gatos Boulevard Plan and Design Standards
Negative Declaration ND-96-21
Consider the recommendations of the General Plan Committee and Architectural
Standards Committee for the Los Gatos Boulevard Plan and Design Standards,
and make a recommendation to the Town Council. A negative declaration has
been prepared for the Los Gatos Boulevard Plan and an Environmental Impact
Report will not be required.
INITIATED BY: Town of Los Gatos
None required.
Recommendation to Town Council.
It has been determined that this project will not have a significant impact on the
environment and a Negative Declaration has been prepared.
For Exhibits A through 0 see report dated August 6, 1997.
New submittal:
P. Letter from McHugh Lincoln-Mercury Auto Dealership owners, received
August 7, 1997
Recommendation to Town Council for adoption.
The letter submitted by James McHugh and Harlan McHugh states support of the intent for Boulevard
improvement in the Los Gatos Boulevard Plan, yet also states concern about certain elements of the Plan.
The McHugh's have been active participants in the Boulevard Plan process since the Charette.
Lee E. Bowman, Planning Director
Prepared by: Kristine Syskowski, Assistant Planner
LEB:KS:sm
cc: General Plan Committee
n:\dev\reports\Igbplan.ds
ATTACHMENT 3
LINCOLN
Mercury
MSHUGH LINCOLN-MERCURY OF LOS GATOS ,JNC{j. ; 1 7, ;.* j
15400 Los Gatos Boulevard j "-�� `= - � fiT 15,1
P.O. Box 1740 Phone (408) 356-8191
LOS GATOS, CALIFORNIA 95031 Fax (408) 358-1252 AUG 0 7 1997
TOWN OF LOS GATOS
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
August 7, 1997
Dear Los Gatos Planning Commission,
I would like to comment on the Los Gatos Boulevard Plan, which
will be discussed on August 13, 1997 at the Planning Commission Meeting.
The Los Gatos auto dealers endorse certain aspects of the Boulevard
Plan, such as improving the overall appearance of the Boulevard. We too
would relish doing business on an attractive, well planned, vital
transportation artery leading in and out of our town. However, other
elements in the Boulevard Plan are anathema to our businesses. Specific
changes that would adversely affect the operations of our auto dealer-
ships and other retail businesses on the Boulevard, are the proposed
narrowing of the lanes, additional bicycle lanes, traffic light
resignali:ation, removing islands and wide turns, and of course the
economics of the plan need to be spefically addressed.
The Los Gatos Auto Dealers are very desirous to improve Los Gatos
Boulevard and will continue to work diligently with the Town to achieve
that goal. We trust that the Planning Commission Members will hear our
comments and ameliorate the proposed Boulevard Plan to our mutual goal
of improvement that makes sense.
JS/vs
incerely.
Mcugh
McHugh
EXHT P
Los Gatos Planning Commission
Minutes of August 13, 1997
COMMISSION COMMENTS
Commissioner Peyton will support the motion and feels that the project will create a new, ten home
neighborhood.
Commissioner Pacheco questioned if reflectivity and landscape standards could be imposed.
Chair Decker stated that it was difficult to legislate this on ten different lots.
Commissioner Nachison requested that the builder and the architect review these standards so that the colors
can blend into the topography. Ms. Nachison would like to see an internal, compatible neighborhood.
Carried 4-2-1. Commissioners Jensen and Pacheco voting no. Commissioner Morgan absent. Appeal
rights recited by Planning Director Bowman.
Chair Decker declared a recess at 9:50 p.m. Meeting resumed at 10:00 p.m.
LOS GATOS BOULEVARD PLAN AND DESIGN STANDARDS/ND-96-21 (00.08)
Consider the recommendations of the General Plan Committee and Architectural Standards Committee
for the Los Gatos boulevard Plan and Design Standards, and make a recommendation to the Town
Council. A negative declaration has been prepared for the Los Gatos boulevard Plan and an
Environmental Impact Report will not be required. INITIATED BY: Town of Los Gatos.
The following people from the audience spoke regarding this matter.
Sheldon Smith, 14225 Laurel Lane, Chair of the Trails and Bikeways Committee suggested that bike racks
be included in the plan.
Robert Swanson, 16005 Los Gatos Boulevard, referred to his letter and complimented the work that had
been done in developing the Boulevard Plan and stated that he supports the Plan. Mr. Swanson indicated,
however, that it was a mistake to include bike lanes because of the traffic hazards and congestion. He
explained that this had been considered before but was rejected because of the safety concerns. Mr. Swanson
indicated his concerns regarding the removal of parking which might be needed in the future and suggested
that the Plan should be flexible, sensitive and practical. Mr. Swanson reminded the Commission that 79% of
the auto sales in Los Gatos come from outside the Community.
Commissioner Abkin thanked Mr. Swanson and his colleagues for being a part of developing the standards
and, in answer to Mr. Smith's concerns, stated that bike racks were included in the recommendations. Mr.
Abkin explained that special studies were commissioned to address the concerns raised by Mr. Swanson and
the results assisted in alleviating the traffic, safety and parking concerns. Mr. Abkin quoted from the traffic
study and stated that the neighbors had supported the improvements which would make the Boulevard a more
pleasant, community oriented, place to visit. Mr. Abkin indicated that the Plan would accomplish the
objective of serving the total Community and narrowing the lanes to eleven feet would not impact the traffic,
as evident in a portion of Sunnyvale and other Cities. Mr. Abkin explained that they had looked very
carefully at parking and had identified a few key spots which were not critical to the adjacent uses and would
capture valuable real estate that could be used for other public concerns. Mr Abkin stated that he hopes the
Plan will be a benefit for both commercial and residential use and will benefit the total Community.
Mr. Swanson questioned the funding and time frame for implementing the Plan.
Mr. Bowman stated that the project would be funded through the CIP and currently there is no funding
25
ATTACHMENT 4
Los Gatos Planning Commission
Minutes of August 13, 1997
for the project. However, revisions to the CEP are made each year and once the Plan is adopted, the
Town Council can weigh the Plan against other projects.
Jim McHugh, 16150 Kennedy Road, owner of 15400 Los Gatos Blvd., thanked the Committee for the work
done on the Plan. Mr. McHugh feels the Plan is capricious and stated that the Auto Dealerships have also
done some research, which is contrary to the Town's research, and indicate that the wide lanes are more
conducive to their business. Mr. McHugh stated his concern regarding the funding of the Plan and who is
going to pay for it and his concern relating to making the Boulevard look like the Downtown area. Mr.
McHugh feels the Boulevard is to transport people in and out, and although he feels the Boulevard can stand
improvements, he is not in favor of bike lanes, narrowing the traffic lanes, or removing on -street parking
spaces.
Commissioner Jensen questioned Mr. McHugh's vision for Boulevard improvements.
Mr. McHugh stated that new sidewalks, trees, a paint code for buildings, and ending the bike lanes at
Blossom Hill would be his preference. Mr. McHugh reiterated that the restriction of traffic flow will
adversely affect the visual view of his business and the narrow lanes will not accommodate the larger
vans which people are now buying.
Commissioner Nachison stated that she does not feel the improvements will hinder business on the
Boulevard. Ms. Nachison explained that the improvements will create a Community feeling while respecting
what is already there and that the overall intent was to give guidance and allow new development standards.
Ms. Nachison stated that the neighborhoods which abut the Boulevard need to feel they can use the existing
and new businesses as pedestrians or by using their bikes. Ms. Nachison reiterated that the Plan included
orientating everything toward the street for easy access and making the Boulevard safer.
Commissioner Peyton stated that the Boulevard should be for everyone including the Auto Dealerships but
not exclusively for the Dealerships and does not understand how narrowing the lanes will affect the sale of
automobiles. Mr. Peyton feels it is an advantage to make the Boulevard useful to more people and that this
Plan will encourage pedestrians and bicycles and slow the traffic flow.
Chair Decker reiterated that narrowing the lanes would slow traffic, be safer, and make the businesses more
visible.
Commissioner Abkin explained that the concerns mentioned this evening had been studied thoroughly and the
result was that the narrowing of the lanes will have an insignificant impact on safety and the space gained will
allow for landscaping and other aesthetics. Mr. Abkin believes that this will change the character of the
Boulevard and make it look more like a small Town, friendly, family kind of place. Mr. Abkin does not feel it
will adversely affect any of the businesses located on the Boulevard.
John Moore, 15500 Los Gatos Blvd., stated that the narrow lanes will cause traffic and safety problems and
reiterated that it will make it less convenient to get to Los Gatos Boulevard and more difficult to do business.
Mr. Moore reminded the Commission that 79% of their business comes from outside the area and they count
on receiving the traffic flow from Hwy 85 and it might be perceived as being more difficult to get to the
Boulevard if the lanes are narrowed. Mr. Moore feels this will adversely affect the automobile dealerships
and revenues to Los Gatos. He does not want to see the Boulevard look like Downtown or encounter the
congestion that is occurring Downtown and he hopes the Plan does not negatively impact business. Mr.
Moore is in favor of the design and landscape concept which he feels will enhance the Boulevard.
Commissioner Abkin stated that the Plan was definitely not an attempt to make the Boulevard look or be like
Downtown. Mr. Abkin explained that it was possible to develop the Boulevard to be consistent with the
character of Los Gatos without being the same as the Downtown and that they want the Boulevard to be a
26
Los Gatos Planning Commission
Minutes of August 13, 1997
different experience. Mr. Abkin stated that the Plan will make it more attractive for people and a more
attractive shopping experience.
Commissioner Pacheco stated that the adjacent residents have to be integrated and be able to have a total
experience.
Commissioner Jensen stated that this is a Plan as opposed to a fact. Ms. Jensen explained that the Plan may
not come to fruition for any number of reasons.
Commissioner Nachison stated that the driving force behind the Plan was to have something in place when
new development was presented. Ms. Nachison explained that this is a well intentioned set of guidelines and
should not be derailed given that the Plan is a design to do something for the overall future of the Town. Ms.
Nachison restated that it was not designed to hurt the automobile dealerships, it was designed to enhance
everyones experience in Town. Ms. Nachison questioned if it was the viewpoint of the auto dealerships that
the Plan should not exist at all.
Mr. Moore stated that the concern is the congestion caused by the narrowing of the lanes, increased
extension of the bike lanes and the funding of the project are their main concerns.
Chair Decker reiterated that the Commission does not want it to be "Downtown" and it was never the
intention to make it "Downtown". Ms. Decker explained that the Plan was to do something for the residences
in the area and the total Community.
Mr. McHugh reiterated that the major concerns are 1) the reduction of the lanes, 2) the extension of the
bicycle lanes, 3) the funding of the project and the possibility of any assessments being imposed, 4)
removal of parking areas.
Commissioner Abkin stated that this is a Plan and the funding issue will be discussed by the proposed
"funding committee" who will recommend to the Town Council.
Sheldon Smith stated that he was not in favor of removing parking in front of any dealership because
bike lanes are compatible with parking, bike lanes are not a safety lanes and are not intended for young
children, and there are no bike lanes on North Santa Cruz or University Avenue.
Commissioner Jensen explained that bike lanes take the bikes out of traffic allowing for better and safer
circulation of traffic for both motorists and cyclists.
Bill Hirschman, 101 Forrester Court, owner of property on Los Gatos Boulevard, is in favor of the Plan and
stated that a strong set of rules or guidelines are needed to get the product the Town is looking for. Mr.
Horschman explained that the Plan needs to blend and, from a development point of few, needs to have a
strong set of rules in order for a developer to present good architecture, good planning, and good buildings.
Mr. Hirschman asked for clearly defined guidelines.
Commissioner Jensen stated that there were two separate Plans and one of them was the Architectural
Standards guideline which would include many of Mr. Hirschman's concerns.
Commissioner Abkin stated that the Plan will be the policy of the Town of Los Gatos, if it is passed by the
Town Council, and the intention is that the policy will be implemented and will be reality in the future. Mr.
Abkin feels the Plan needs to be taken seriously for this reason.
There was no one else wishing to speak to this matter.
27
Los Gatos Planning Commission
Minutes of August 13, 1997
Chair Decker closed the Public Hearing
Motion by Commissioner Abkin, seconded by Chair Decker to make the negative declaration ND-96-
21 and recommend the adoption of the Los Gatos Boulevard Plan and Design Standards to the Town
Council.
Carried unanimously. Commissioner Morgan absent.
NEW OTHER BUSINESS.
Chair Decker referred to a letter received from Sheldon Smith regarding bicycle racks.
Mr. Bowman stated that the Town's Insurance Company (ABAG) had recommended that the bicycle racks,
referred to in Mr. Smith's letter, not be considered because they had been tried in other Cities and had been
found hazardous in public areas.
Sub -Committee Reports (00.06)
Chair Decker stated that there were no sub -committee reports.
ADJOURNMENT
Chair Decker adjourned the meeting at 11:10 p.m.
The next scheduled Planning Commission meeting will be held on August 27,1997 in the Town
Council Chambers, 110 East Main Street, Los Gatos, California.
TOWN OF S GATOS PLANNING COMMISSION
August 13, 1997
SANDY DECKER, CHAIR
APPROVED AS TO FORM: ATTEST:
LEE BOWMAN, Planning Director MarLyn J. Rasmussen, CMC
Senior Deputy Clerk
28