Loading...
07 Staff Report - Update Town's Environmental Review ProcessDATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: MEETING DATE: 05/18/98 ITEM NO. COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT May 12, 1998 MAYOR AND TOWN COUNCIL TOWN MANAGER UPDATE OF TOWN'S ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW PROCESS RECOMMENDATION: Accept staff report. DISCUSSION: The Town's environmental review procedures were adopted in 1983 and have served the Town well. However, it is possible to streamline certain aspects of the process (See Attachment 1 and 2). The current procedures require the Town to use one of three consultants to prepare environmental assessments and documents for projects not exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The consultant assigned to a particular project is determined by a weekly rotational schedule and the date that the project is deemed complete by the Development Review Committee (DRC) (See Attachment 3). After a consultant is assigned, staff meets with the consultant and authorizes the consultant to proceed with the preparation of an Initial Study and Negative Declaration. If an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) is required by the Initial Study, the assigned consultant ceases all work and is automatically excluded from preparing the EIR. The Planning Department then prepares a Request for Proposals (RFP) and solicits a scope of work and cost estimate from the authorized list of EIR Consultants. Concerns have arisen from this process because consultants do not have the flexibility to accommodate Planning Commission/Town Council meeting deadlines, can't do the project with the identified cost constraints, or can't meet the applicants' time schedules. Accounting and billing practices between consultants also vary dramatically among the three firms retained by the Town. Two of the three consultants bill for brief telephone conversations at half hour increments and complete only the minimum work specified by their contracts. The third is more flexible and has accommodated requests outside the scope of work in the firm's contract with the Town. Additionally, if an EIR is required for a project, the consultant who prepared the Initial Study (often the best qualified to prepare the document because of familiarity with its environmental constraints and impacts) is automatically eliminated under the Town's existing procedures. The RFP processes that is subsequently required adds a minimum of two to three week to the process of the applicant's project. This system was intended to prevent a consultant from requiring unnecessary EIR's and to prevent the perception of any conflicts of interest. (Continued on Page 2) PREPARED BY: LEE E. BOWMAN PLANNING DIRECTOR Reviewed by: Attorri Finance Revised: 5/12/98 4:41 pm Reformatted: 10/23/95 PAGE 2 MAYOR AND TOWN COUNCIL SUBJECT: UPDATE OF TOWN'S ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW PROCESS May 12, 1998 To address these concerns and attempt to improve the process, the Planning Department is preparing an update of these procedures that will eliminate the rotational schedule and will retain only a primary consultant and a secondary substitute consultant to conduct all the environmental assessments for the Town. The update will also allow the Planning Director the discretion to authorize the primary or secondary consultant to prepare an EIR if it is required by an Initial Study, or to prepare an RFP and solicit a scope of work and cost estimate from an expanded list of authorized EIR consultants if a possible conflict of interest may exist. Staff is experienced enough with CEQA and feels competent to analyze documents to determine if an EIR is warranted and to prevent any conflicts of interest. Other proposed modifications include: requiring consultant attendance at a minimum number of scoping, staff, Planning Commission, and Town Council meetings; requiring the consultant to conduct a site visit with Town staff; requiring specific consultant work product deadlines/schedules; requiring the consultant to produce clarification letters or documentation for environmental assessments that have been prepared at no additional cost; and requiring specific numbers of copies of draft and final environmental documents. A draft of the update will be prepared for adoption at the June 1, 1998 Town Council meeting along with an expanded list of recommended EIR Consultants, as well as recommendations for both the primary and secondary environmental review consultants. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENTS: Is not a project defined under CEQA, and no further action is required. FISCAL IMPACT: None. Attachments: 1. Existing Town Environmental Review Procedure with Flow Chart 2. Existing Environmental Impact Report Procedures 3. Existing Environmental Consultant Rotational Schedule LEB:EO N:1D E V\CNCLRPTS\EN V -CON. RE V RESOLUTION NO. 1983-218 RESOLUTION ADOPTING ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW PROCEDURES INFORNin I ION ITEM PLANNING MMISSION AGENDA 12/14/83 cc: Planning Staff 11/22/83: RESOLVED, under the provisions of Public Resources Code Sections 21000 et seq (California Environmental Quality Act of 1970) that the provisions of the State EIR Guidelines (as amended) are hereby incorporated by reference and adopted as the Town of Los Gatos procedures for the evaluation of projects and the preparation of en- vironmental impact reports. FURTHER RESOLVED, that the procedures shown on the attached chart entitled "Town's CEQA Process" are established as the procedures for the Town of Los Gatos under the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act. FURTHER RESOLVED, this resolution is effective December 1, 1983. FURTHER RESOLVED, this resolution repeals the procedures established by the previous resolutions 1973-38, 1973-70, 1973-164, 1975-90, 1976-161. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a cont,;n„Ari Too„;ter the Town of Los Gatos held on the 2L-_ the following vote: meeting of the Town Council of day of October , 1983, by AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS Joanne Benjamin, Eric D. Carlson, Terrence J. Daily and Thomas J. Ferrito NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS None ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS None ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS Mavor Brent N. Ventura SIGNED: /s/ Thomas J, Ferrito GJL -MAYOR OF THE TOWN OF LOS GATOS ATTEST: /s/ Rose E. AldaE (seal) CLERK OF THE TOWN OF LOS GATOS ATTACH fi E N MI 6 U z z raw 0 r 6 03 la u - J F U oc' O l r 2 e < 3 EXHIBIT A ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT PROCEDURES 1. Applicant files development application with the Planning Department, including all fees. If the applicant's project is determined to be "categorically exempt" (as defined by the State Guidelines), the application may be accepted for processing by the Town and set for hearing before the Development Review Committee. 2. If the application is determined not categorically exempt, the application is referred (on a rotation basis) to the Town -retained consultant(s) who prepare initial studies. (The purpose of the initial study is to assist in determining if a project requires an EIR, or if a Negative Declaration may be prepared.) Initial studies will be performed on a flat fee basis to be paid by the applicant to the Town (presently $350). 3. The consultant previously assigned for that filing deadline is notified by phone by the Town of the receipt of an application requiring environmental review. 4. The consultant meets with Town staff within 48 hours to discuss project and known environmental concerns, and is provided copies of project proposal, plans, application and supporting data. Authorization to Proceed document consistent with master contract is prepared and signed. The project may or may not be scheduled for initial review by the Development Review Committee, depending on the scope of the project. 5. Upon receipt of the authority to proceed, the consultant will complete the initial study, prepare the recommended negative declaration, and submit all documentation to the Town. Such documentation will normally consist of the recommended negative declaration, the assessment checklist, and addendum sheets, and any other supporting documents used in the determination. At the present time, the consultant is not required to attend any Planning Commission or other public meetings. The consultant may be required to attend a Development Review Committee meeting, depending on the scope of the project. If the Planning Director concurs with the consultant that a Negative Declaration is appropriate, the project may then proceed. If the Director determines that an EIR is required, all work on the application is suspended pending receipt of a draft EIR. In all cases, the Director shall notify the applicant of his decision in writing. 6. The Planning Director will file all Negative Declarations with the County Clerk. Notices of Determination will continue to be filed by the Planning Director and the Town Clerk. 7. If an EIR is required, the Planning Director will select three or four EIR consultants from the established list. The selections will be made by lot and sent a request for proposal to prepare a Draft EIR. In no instance can the consultant who prepared the initial study be chosen to prepare the EIR. ATTACHMENT 2 Page 2 - ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT PROCEDURES 8. The EIR consultant shall submit a scope of work and cost estimate for preparation of the EIR to the Planning Director for approval. If the Director finds both acceptable, the applicant will be notified of the results. If the applicant then elects to proceed with the project, a retainer equal to the projected cost plus a Town fee must be deposited with the Town before work on the EIR will begin. A contract between the Town and consultant will then be prepared and submitted to the Town Council for approval. 9. The EIR consultant shall solicit information from the applicant and all agencies having jurisdiction, conduct environmental studies and research as necessary to complete the EIR. Strong emphasis shall be placed on the alternative section of the EIR for plan design alternatives and project mitigation measures. 10. The EIR consultant shall prepare an "executive draft" in sufficient quantities for preliminary Development Review Committee review. If the "executive draft" is found acceptable, the consultant shall prepare and distribute the draft EIR as required by the Town. (The Planning Director will prepare and file the Notice of Completion.) 11. The EIR consultant shall be responsible for attending all EIR hearings, presenting or clarifying EIR information, responding in writing to comments raised at the meeting, preparing any required EIR addendums, and assembling and presenting the Final EIR and statement of overriding considerations (if significant impacts are not mitigated. dg 2/27/84 TOWN OF LOS GATOS PLANNING DEPARTMENT 110 E. MAIN STREET LOS GATOS, CA 95032 (408) 354-6872 MAILING ADDRESS: P. O. BOX 949 LOS GATOS, CA 95031 Los Gatos Environmental Assessment Initial Study 1998 Consultant Schedule Rotation for Week Beginning as Shown JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC ESA, 19 9 2/23 13 4/25 15 6/27 17 7/28 19 9/30 21 inc. LSA, 5/26 16 9/30 20 11 1/22 13 3/24 14 5/26 16 7/28 Inc. Geier 12 2/23 16 6/27 18 8/29 20 10/31 21 12 2/23 14 Geier Consultant selection is made based on the date the application is deemed complete by the Development Review Committee, unless advanced selection is made by the Town for special projects. Development Review Program staff are: Sandy Baily Trish Duarte Kristine Syskowski Erwin Ordonez Ryan Bane Chris Lane Martin Alkire Revised: January 6, 1998 N:\DEV\CONSULT.SCH Associate Planner (408) 354-6873 Sr. Engineering Technician (408) 354-6860 Assistant Planner (408) 354-6807 Assistant Planner (408) 354-6875 Planning Technician (408) 354-6879 Planning Technician (408) 354-6812 Planning Technician/Code Complaince (408) 354-6874 ATTACHMENT 3 Town Council Minutes May 18, 1998 Redevelopment Agency Los Gatos, California SHORT TERM PARKING ALTERNATIVES CONT. • Look at the 30 minute parking restrictions on the spaces next to the Plaza and across from Willow Street Pizza. The following people from the audience spoke to this issue: Sue Farwell, 121 Laurel Ave., spoke against stacking equipment for safety and liability reasons. Andy Faver, 10 Almaden Boulevard, San Jose, representing Lyndon Plaza, asked that they be allowed to continue limited valet parking in the Lyndon Plaza lot on a interim basis. Bill Bacci, 236 N. Santa Cruz, asked Council to take action on long term parking immediately. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW PROCESS UPDATE (07.47) Motion by Mr. Hutchins, seconded by Mr. Attaway, that Council accept staff report regarding update of Town's Environmental Review Process, with the following comments: Interested parties should receive a notice about this subject appearing on the June 1, 1998 Council Agenda; The consultant selection process will incorporate a Council member and a Planing Commissioner to help make the process more public; There should be a sunset date to st the time for review and renegotiation of contract; This is a step towards streamlining the Environmental Review Process, which in many cities is done by staff; The Initial Study consultant will also be able to do an EIR if needed. Carried by a vote of 4 ayes. Mrs. Benjamin absent. COUNCIL COMMITTEE REPORTS Linda Lubeck reported on the facilitation meetings between neighborhoods and CPUC & PG&E. She noted that three meetings have been held for organizational and technical considerations. Makeup of the committee has been modified, and discussions concerning undergrounding are taking place. ADJOURNMENT Mayor Lubeck adjourned this evening's meeting at 9:53 p.m. TC: D 10: MM051898 ATTEST: Marian V. Cosgrove Town Clerk 7