Loading...
Item 1 - Staff Report with Attachments PREPARED BY: JENNIFER ARMER, AICP Senior Planner 110 E. Main Street Los Gatos, CA 95030 ● 408-354-6832 www.losgatosca.gov MEETING DATE: 04/01/2021 ITEM: 1 TOWN OF LOS GATOS GENERAL PLAN UPDATE ADVISORY COMMITTEE REPORT REPORT DATE: March 26, 2021 TO: General Plan Update Advisory Committee FROM: Joel Paulson, Community Development Director SUBJECT: Review and Discussion of the Revised Initial Draft of the Racial, Social, and Environmental Justice Element. BACKGROUND: On December 3, 2020, the General Plan Update Advisory Committee (GPAC) met to review and discuss the initial draft of the Racial, Social, and Environmental Justice Element. DISCUSSION: Based on the discussion at the December 3, 2020 meeting, the consultants have revised the initial draft of the Racial, Social, and Environmental Justice Element (Attachment 1). In addition to the formal meeting minutes for the December 3, 2020 GPAC meeting, the consultants have prepared a table summarizing the comments received, and how they have been implemented (Attachment 2). All suggestions for changes to the text of this Element, whether from committee members or the public, that are received by 11:00 a.m. on Wednesday, March 31, 2021, will be provided to the GPAC in an Addendum Report that afternoon so that text changes can be considered by all committee members prior to the meeting. Any comments received after that time, but before 11:00 a.m. on the day of the meeting will be provided in a Desk Item. Attachments: 1. Revised Initial Draft of Racial, Social, and Environmental Justice Element 2. Comment Response Summary Table This Page Intentionally Left Blank Racial, Social, and Environmental Justice Element April 2021 GPAC Draft 2-1 Like many other communities in the United States, Los Gatos has a history which includes racial injustice. Often, racial injustice also leads to other forms of injustice, including social and environmental injustice. A number of existing and former Town residents, who identify as Black;, Indigenous;, or People of Color (BIPOC);, have come forward during the 2020 Black Lives Matter protests and subsequent Los Gatos community conversations to share their experiences and providedto provide suggestions for increasing diversity andimproving inclusivity in Town. The Town recognizes that it needs to increase its efforts to ensure that all the members of the Los Gatos community (i.e., residents, workers, business owners, local organizations, and visitors) feel valued, safe, respected, and secure. Increasing diversity and inclusivity involves enhancing community engagement, considering the implications of Town decisions for all members of the community, and being open to new approaches to meet the changing needs of Los Gatos. Los Gatos enjoys relative affluence compared with the rest of California, and scores well in State-wide assessment tools such as CalEnviroScreen 3.0 and the California Healthy Places Index. Places and people of privilege have a responsibility to maintain and increase their awareness and understanding of social issues. This Element represents is a commitment to that responsibility and emphasizes making Los Gatos a more ethnically diverse community. Making progress toward racial, social, and environmental justice can be difficult and requires all community members to engage on these issues over a long period of time. As a result, this Element includes goals, policies, and programs that encourage and support local efforts to increase participation in local governance processes and to improve local awareness of racial, social, and environmental injustice. Although a General Plan, by itself, cannot make a community more equitable, it can set Race, Income, and Language in Los Gatos2018 Town Demographics As of 2018, the median Los Gatos household income was $140,395; over a third of Town households earned more than $200,000. Educational attainment is similarly high. 64.7% percent of residents over age 25 have at least a bachelor’s degree, and of those, nearly 45% percent also had earned a graduate or professional degree. Racial diversity, however, is lacking. 71.7 percent of Los Gatos residents were whiteLos Gatos residents are also well- educated, where 67.4 percent of residents over 25 years of age had at least a bachelor’s degree. Of those who had at least a bachelor’s degree, nearly 45 percent also had a graduate or professional degree. In 2018, the Los Gatos community was 82.8 percent White, 17.7 14.3 percent Asian, 8.4 percent Hispanic or Latino, 2.73.9 other (multiple races), 1.5 percent Black or African American, and 0.2 percent (includes American Indian and Alaska Native, Native Hawaiian and other Pacific Islander., and some other race), and 2.0 percent Black or African American.   Asian residents comprised the largest minority group in Los Gatos and tend to have higher incomes and levels of educational attainment. Among the Asian population in Los Gatos, those of Chinese descent made up the largest group, followed by East Indians. Although the minority population has been growing, 94.8 percent of residents speak English very well Most ATTACHMENT 1 GPAC Draft 2040 General Plan    2-2 GPAC Draft April 2021 upThis General Plan creates the framework through which residents are empowered toto empower residents to make progress towards equality. The themes covered discussed in this Element lay the foundation for creating a more equitable and inclusive environment for all Town for all residents, businesses, visitors, and organizations of Los Gatos. In addition to those contained in this Element, eEquity-oriented goals and policies can also be found throughout this Plan, particularly in the Housing, Mobility, and Land Use Elements. the rest of the General Plan, including, but not limited to, the Housing Element, Mobility Element, and the Health Community Section in the Land Use Element. This element is divided into the following sections: Section Title Page Key Terms .............................................................................................................................................. 2   Racial and Social Justice ....................................................................................................... 4   Environmental Justice ............................................................................................................ 5   Civil Engagement in the Public Decision-Making Process .................................................... 7   Implementation Programs ...................................................................................................... 9  Key Terms BIPOC. Acronym referring to Black, Indigenous, and Persons of Color. Overall Comparison Comparing Los Gatos to Santa Clara County and the State of California (2018) provides a better representation of the differences between the population’s ethnic diversity of the three entities. Compared to Santa Clara County and the State of California, Los Gatos has a substantially smaller Hispanic and Latino population. This Hispanic and Latino population is three times smaller compared to the County and four times smaller compared to the State. Similar ethnic groups including Black and African American, American Indian, and Pacific Islander have a similar distribution, with the County and State outpacing the Town. Unlike other ethnic groups, the Asian population in Town is lower than the ,County but aligns with the makeup statewide. 2. Racial, Social, and Environmental Justice Element   April 2021 GPAC Draft 2-3 Disadvantaged Community. An area identified by the California Environmental Protection Agency (CalEPA) pursuant to Section 39711 of the California Health and Safety Code or a predominately low incomen area that is a low-income area that is disproportionately affected by environmental pollution and other hazards that can lead to negative health effects, exposure, or environmental degradation. Environmental Justice. The fair treatment of people of all races, cultures, incomes, political and religious affiliation, and national origins with respect to the development, adoption, implementation, and enforcement of environmental laws, regulations, and policies. Equality. The state of being equal, especially in status, rights, and opportunities. Equity. Fairness or justice in the way people are treated. Implicit Bias. Attitudes or stereotypes that affect our understanding, actions, and decisions in an unconscious manner, often based on characteristics such as race, ethnicity, age, and appearance. Social Capital. The ability for residents to feel a sense of belonging in their community and to have a meaningful connection to the place where they live. Socially Disadvantaged Individuals and Groups. Socially disadvantaged individuals and groups who have been subjected to prejudice or some form of discrimination or bias because of their perceived identity as a member of a particular group (i.e., race, ethnicity, culture, sex, political or religious affiliation, sexual orientation, age, immigration status) without regard to their individuality and/or merit. based on race, ethnicity, culture, sex, age, sexual-orientation, immigration status, or some other bias within American society because of their identities as members of groups and without regard to their individual qualities.   GPAC Draft 2040 General Plan    2-4 GPAC Draft April 2021 Racial and Social Justice This Section identifies goals and policies which seek to advance Town efforts toward diversity and inclusivity. Implementation of the programs presented will allow the Town to monitor its progress in achieving racial, social, and environmental justice. This section includes goals and policies that seek to further racial and social justice efforts in the Town. While the Town cannot immediately fix all injustices past and present, this section providesIt is the Town’s goals to take actionable efforts the Town canto implement in pursuit of a more racially and socially just Los Gatos. The following goals and policies are intended to promote equality in Los Gatos. Ensure Support equity, inclusion, and access to opportunities for all residents, businesses, visitors, and local organizationsresidents. Service Delivery Provide Direct Town services and infrastructure investments to address any existing inequities. Community Budgeting Enage the community through mulitple participation opportunities in the Town’s budget process. Institutional Bias Continue to build organizational and institutional skills in all Town Departments to advance equity, while and eliminatinge potential institutional and structural inequities, and implicit bias. Celebrate Town Diversity Develop and invest in arts, education, and other community programming which celebrates diversityAllocate resources in a manner that provides community programs that are appropriate to a wide variety of ages, interests, and backgrounds to celebrate Los Gatos’ cultural diversity. Welcoming Town Promote Los Gatos as a welcoming and bias-free community. Respect, protect, and promote, and fulfill the civil and human rights of all members of the community., including but not limited to low-income persons, BIPOC, and LGBTQ+. Culturally Informed and Competent Services Develop and implement tTown-wide strategies, practices, and services that are culturally informed and both acknowledge and reflect diversityEnsure that the Town’s strategies, practices, services, and materials are culturally informed and competent for a diverse population. Socially Disadvantaged Populations Develop and implement policies, services, and programs designed to address the needs of socially disadvantaged and vulnerable community members. Ensure that new policies, services, and programs improve the lives of community members and avoid displacement of those more vulnerable to poor health outcomes. Diverse Representation Seek diverse representation on all Town boards, committees, and commissions. 2. Racial, Social, and Environmental Justice Element   April 2021 GPAC Draft 2-5 Advancing Racial Equity Work Encourage appointed Town boards, committees, and commissions to advance the Town’s racial equity work. Workforce Development Collaborate with public and private universities, colleges, and technical schools to support innovation and the development, training, and retention of a skilled and diverse workforce. Diversity Training for Town Staff Develop and implement diversity training protocols, to include programs addressing Implicit Bias, for all Town employees and support similar training efforts undertaken by the business community.Support diversity training for landlords and business-owners in Los Gatos, which includes implicit bias training. Diverse Town Staff Promote equitable hiring procdures that focuses on fostering a diverse Town staff. Community Diversity, Sensitivity, and Awareness Training Promote diversity education and sentivity and awareness training for all members of the community including residents, business owners, and local organizations. Enhance Community Policing Strengthen the Town’s longstanding community policing approach by proactively reaching out to community members to listen to their concerns and work together on viable solutions. Implement Best Practices in 21st Century Policing Continue the Town’s commitment to building community trust, procedural justice, de-escalation of force and strengthening partnerships with mental health providers to address the societal issues that involve calls for police services. Environmental Justice CalEnviroScreen 3.0 indicates that Los Gatos does not have any disadvantaged communities as defined by State law. Los Gatos is committed to improving the well-being of all town residents and those affected by Town actions in neighboring communities. The objectives contained in this Section strive to reduce health risks The Town, however, is committed to improving the well-being of all Los Gatos residents. Environmental justice objectives and policies seek to reduce health risks by minimizing pollution exposure, improving air quality, and promoting better access to public facilities, healthy food, and safe and sanitary homes. The following goals and policies will guide the incorporation of environmental justice for all citizens of Los Gatos. Ensure that land use decisions do not result in adverse impacts to socially disadvantaged individuals and groups. Ensure that land use decisions benefit all Los Gatos residents, and do not create a disproportionate burden to any neighborhood based on location, income, race, color, national origin, or another characteristic. Environmental Justice in Relation to Land Use Evaluate and avoid, reduce, or mitigate potential adverse health and safety impacts associated with land use decisions and provide for the fair treatment and meaningful involvement of all GPAC Draft 2040 General Plan    2-6 GPAC Draft April 2021 people stakeholders regardless of income, race, color, or national origin, or another characteristic. Negative Impacts from Potential Hazards Reduce negative impacts associated with environmental hazards, including, but not limited to, industrial operations and roadway-generated air and noise pollution, through the enforcement development and implementation of additional project specific mitigations for all developmentmeasures. Coordination on Siting of Utilities Coordinate with utility providers in the siting, site layout, and design of gas and electric facilities, including changes to existing facilities, to minimize environmental, aesthetic, and safety impacts on existing and future residents. Meaningful Involvement Provide for the fair treatment and meaningful involvement of all people regardless of income, religious or political affiliation, race, color, or national origin. Actively advocate to eEnsure all residents have access to healthy foods, schools, parks/recreation areas/open spaces, and medical services, and other amenities. Acceptance of Government-Issued Vouchers Coordinate with Farmer’s Market vendors and local food retailers to accept payment through Electronic Benefit Transfer (EBT), which allows residents in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) and the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) to purchase food with their program benefits. Regulations Allowing Healthy Foods Ensure the Zoning Ordinance and other regulations allow for increased access to healthy foods by all residents (e.g., healthy food retail outlets, community gardens, farmers markets), while discouraging unhealthy choices (e.g., fast food chains) around vulnerable populations.Adopt and implement land use policies, regulations, and Ordinances which allow for and promote increased access to healthy food options (i.e. groceries, farmers markets, and community gardens). Access to Community Assets Determine and address any gaps between neighborhoods, commercial service areas, recreation facilities, education, medical services, and other community assets in the Town to provide equitable access to these assets and facilitate physical activity in everyday life.Identify and address gaps in access to residential, commercial, recreation, and health resources such that these community assets are available to all. Evaluation of Capital Projects Ensure Promote equitable investment in capital improvements Town-wide. Non-Profit Partnerships Work with non-profit and governmental sectors to provide access assistance to homeless, heathcare, rental assistance and, food assistance, and other poverty alleviating programs and services. 2. Racial, Social, and Environmental Justice Element   April 2021 GPAC Draft 2-7 Additional policies relating to healthy communities are covered in Section 3.10 (Healthy Community) in the Land Use Element. Develop, implement, and enforce policies to ensure access to Ensure safe and sanitary homeshousing throughout the community. Code Violation Enforcement Continue to enforce municipal and State code violations that compromise the safety of homes and the health of its residents.Develop and adopt policies, regulations, and Ordinances which reflect up-to-date construction and safety measures for all residential structures, while continuing to take enforcement actions for violations of any municipal or state building and safety codes. Civil Civic Engagement in the Public Decision-Making Process Racial, social, and environmental justice efforts must be bolstered by a strong culture of civicl engagement in the Town’s decision-making processes. Studies have shown that well-rounded public engagement processes increase social capital in projects and promote equitable community development. This section is devotedThe Town is committed to goals and policies that build social capital through engagement and empowerment of the public, while emphasizing public participation, transparency, and inclusion. Policies within this Section are specifically designed to enhance communications to underrepresented populations. General civic engagement in planning is covered in Section 3.8 (Civic Engagement) in the Land Use Element. The following goal and policies will guide inclusive public decision-making processes. Engage the public, in particular socially disadvantaged individuals and groups, in Town decision-making and facilitate the public’s involvement in civic life. Community Capacity-Building Collaborate with local organizations and partners to build and strengthen historically marginalized communities’ capacity to participate in local planning, governmental affairs, and policy decision- making. Leadership Development Support leadership development programs for socially disadvantaged individuals and groups youth and adults to enhance effective engagement in Town processes, including but not limited to planning, land use, and budgeting. Opportunities to Communicate with Town Leaders Encourage creative approaches to communicate with the community and provide more opportunities for the community to engage with Town staff, such as “Coffee with Town Leaders.”Brainstorm new and innovative approaches to facilitate communication between members of the community and tTown elected officials and staff members. GPAC Draft 2040 General Plan    2-8 GPAC Draft April 2021 Facilitate a Culture of Inclusion and Compassion Work with non-profit, faith, education, and other community-based partners to facilitate a culture in Los Gatosthe Town of inclusion, empathy, compassion, acceptance, and unity. Transparency and Public Participation Opportunities Facilitate transparent Town decision-making processes through enhanced public outreach, engagement, and participation, speciically to socially disadvantaged individuals and groups . Event Scheduling Schedule Town events during different times of the day and week (e.g., daytime/evening, weekday/weekend). Schedule Town events on different days and times to encourage and facilitate participation among community members with work, school, and other obligations that conflict with more traditionally scheduling. Services at Events Provide childcare and translation services at public events and Town meetings, as necessary.   2. Racial, Social, and Environmental Justice Element   April 2021 GPAC Draft 2-9 Implementation Programs Programs Implements which Policy(ies) Responsible Supporting Department(s) 2021 – 2025 2026 – 2040 Annual Ongoing A Community-Based Budget Process Develop and facilitate a community-based budgeting process to provide the public an opportunity to identify funding priorities annually. This program could feature in- person and online engagement opportunities. RSEJ-1.1 RSEJ-1.2 Town Manager  B Equity Evaluation of the Proposed Budget Annually evaluate the proposed Capital Improvement Budget and any service expansion/contraction in the Operating Budget to ensure that all neighborhoods are treated equitably in the availability of services and infrastructure investment. RSEJ-1.2 Town Manager  C Town Staff Diversity and Other Training Require all Town staff to undergo on-going diversity and implicit bias training. RSEJ-1.3 Town Manager  D Expand Recruitment for Town Employment Opportunities to Attract Diverse Candidates Determine innovative effective recruitment strategies to attract diverse candidates to Town employment opportunities. Work with educational institutions and other entities to promote local government job opportunities with middle school, high school, technical school, and college students. RSEJ-1.3 RSEJ-2.5 RSEJ-2.7 Town Manager Human Resources  E Social and Racial Justice Equality Survey Develop an annual survey which measures the successfulness of advancing social equity and diversity Town-wide. RSEJ-2.3 RSEJ-2.4 RSEJ-2.5 RSEJ-2.8 Town Manager  F Social and Racial Justice Commission Form a Social and Racial Justice Commission that will serve as an advisory board to the Town Council to advance the Town’s racial equity work. RSEJ-2.4 Town Manager  GPAC Draft 2040 General Plan    2-10 GPAC Draft April 2021 EG Career and Job Training Coordinate with the Chamber of Commerce and other organizations to organize an annual career and job fair with local employers to highlight local employment and employment training opportunities for Los Gatos residents. RSEJ-2.5 Town Manager  H Diversity, Sensitivity, and Awareness Training Develop Ddiversity, Ssensitivity, and Aawareness Ttraining courses and curriculum for residents, business owners, and local organizations to take part in. Training could include, but is not limited to, a column in the weekly newsletter and/or links to recommended online material, lectures and community engagement events. RSEJ-2.8 Town Manager  I Citizens Police Academy Implement a Citizens Police Academy to educate community members in law enforcement policies, practices, and problem-solving, as well as promoting the opportunity for one-on-one interaction with Department members in a relaxed environment. RSEJ-2.9 RSEJ-2.10 Town Manager Los Gatos- Monte Sereno Police Department  J Community Engagement Develop mechanisms to communicate and engage members of the community who are not typically active in civic issues to foster relationships with the Town and the Police Department. This can be accomplished by leveraging technology and by focusing resources on non-enforcement interaction with the community. RSEJ-2.9 RSEJ-2.10 Town Manager Los Gatos- Monte Sereno Police Department  FK Healthy Food Access Regulations Audit and Update Conduct an internal audit of and make necessary changes to Town regulations, including but not limited to the Zoning Ordinance, to remove any administrative barriers to increase access to healthy foods. RSEJ-4.2 Community Development  L Capital Improvement Prioritization Create a defined set of criteria that measures and prioritizes equitable distribution of Capital Improvement (CI) Projects Town-wide. RSEJ-4.4 Parks and Public Works Town Manager  2. Racial, Social, and Environmental Justice Element   April 2021 GPAC Draft 2-11     GM Rental Multi-Family Housing Inspection Program Create a program to ensure that all rental multi-family housing is inspected on a three to five-year cycle to ensure compliance with all building, housing, and other codes for safe and sanitary housing. RSEJ-5.1 Town Manager Community Development Code Compliance  HN Expand Outreach and Communication Materials to Enhance Transparency and Participation. Develop clear and inclusive outreach materials, expand media campaigns, and implement other strategies to engage the public in the Town’s processes. RSEJ-6.5 Town Manager  IO Childcare at Public Meetings and Events Work with non-profit partners to provide childcare services and children activities during in-person Town public meetings (i.e., Town Council, Planning Commission) and Town events. RSEJ-6.7 Town Manager  P Translation Services Evaluate the need for ongoing translations services andfor Town events and meetings, including the types of services and requested languages. RSEJ-6.7 Town Manager  This Page Intentionally Left Blank General Plan Policy Document Edit Tracking January 2021 Page 1 of 13  Racial, Social, and Environmental Justice Element The following are comments received by the GPAC and corresponding changes in the Revised Public  Review Draft Element.  Racial, Social, and Environmental Justice Element  GPAC/Town Comments Corresponding Change  Submitted GPAC Comments prior to 12/3 Meeting  P.2‐1 Last paragraph, third sentence: change “who” to “many of whom.” This was removed.   P.2‐1 2nd paragraph, first sentence, “all members of the Los Gatos community—residents, workers, business owners and visitors—feel valued…” This comment has been reflected.   P.2‐1 3rd paragraph, “Places and people of privilege have a responsibility to maintain and increase their awareness and understanding of social issues.”  Strike the word maintain in this context. This comment has been reflected.   P.2‐1 Change “this Element represents a commitment to” to “this Element is a commitment to”. This comment has been reflected.   P.2‐1 Last sentence:  Strike “Although a general plan cannot by itself make a community more equitable” and simply affirm: “This General Plan creates . . .” This comment has been reflected.   P.2‐2: The intro states a responsibility to “residents, businesses visitors and organizations,” so the policies throughout should be sure to include each of these sectors. This comment has been reflected.   P.2‐3: 2.1: Strike the sentence “While the Town cannot . . .” and revise sentence to a simple, positive statement This sentence has been re‐worked to create an  action that does not provide an “out” or infer  one.   RSEJ‐1: Include workers? Goal RSEJ‐1 has been updated to reflect the  expansion of “businesses, visitors, and  organizations.”  RSEJ 1.1: Strike “any existing”. This comment has been reflected.   ATTACHMENT 2 General Plan Policy Document Edit Tracking January 2021   Page 2 of 13  Racial, Social, and Environmental Justice Element  GPAC/Town Comments Corresponding Change  1.2: Why the focus on budgeting?  To be  consistent, this should include planning and land  use (see RSEJ‐6.2).  After a discussion with Town staff it was  recommended to maintain this policy as is.   1.3: Strike word “potential”. This comment has been reflected.   NEW 1.5: Celebrate workforce diversity? A policy on celebrating workforce diversity would  be redundant. A new Policy RSEJ‐2.7 has been  added to focus on a diverse Town staff and Policy  RSEJ‐2.5 has been modified to include a diverse  workforce.   RSEJ‐2.1:  What does “competent” mean? The term competent was removed.  2.5: Incorporate concept of diverse workforce.   And is this directed toward employees of the  Town or employees in Town?  Diversity has been added to the Policy. A new  policy RSEJ‐2.7 has been added to address a  diverse Town staff.   2.6: Include training for residents and  organizations too.  This could be in the form of a  column in the weekly newsletter and/or links to  recommended online material, lectures and  community engagement events.  New Policy RSEJ‐2.8 was added to address  additional training for the community. Specific  forms of training as noted in the comment were  added to Implementation Program H.   2.2: Strike first sentence (that’s another of those  “we don’t have a problem” problems)  This comment has been reflected.   3.1: This seems to be two policies.  Separate. This comment has been reflected and now  includes a new Policy RSEJ‐3.4.   4.4: However, the Town figures out how to do  this, add this as a criterion for prioritizing Town CI  projects.  A new Implementation Program J has been added  to reflect this comment.     Town Staff has confirmed the direction outlined  in Policy RSEJ‐4.4 and Implementation Program J.  4.5: Change to “homelessness, rental and food  assistance, and other poverty‐alleviating  programs and services.” Assistance.  This comment has been reflected.   2.3: Do you intend this to be civil engagement (as  in respectful) or civic engagement?  This was meant to be Civic not Civil. The comment  has been reflected in the Title.  And change “This section is devoted” to “The  Town is committed to”.  This comment has been reflected.   6.2: This should have a diversity focus. This comment has been reflected.   6.4: How does this facilitated culture grow or  expand beyond the organizations mentioned?   How does it become the cultural fabric of the  Town?  The intent is to start by fostering partnerships  with these entities to encourage increased  inclusion, empathy, compassion, acceptance, and  unity in Los Gatos. How that translates Townwide  cannot be driven by the General Plan. That is  solely driven by community members.  General Plan Policy Document Edit Tracking January 2021   Page 3 of 13  Racial, Social, and Environmental Justice Element  GPAC/Town Comments Corresponding Change  IP D: Replace “innovative” with “effective”. This comment has been reflected.   Page 2‐1  Introduction  1st paragraph:   “…conversations to share their experiences and  to provide suggestions for increasing diversity  and inclusivity in Town.”  3rd paragraph:  “…to improve local awareness of racial, social,  and environmental injustice.”  “…it can create a framework through which  residents are empowered to make progress  towards equality.”  These comments have been reflected.   Dialogue Box on Demographics  1. I’d name it “2018 Town Demographics”    2. “…Educational attainment is similarly high.  64.7% of residents over age 25 have at least a  Bachelor’s Degree, and of those, nearly 45%  also had earned a graduate or professional  degree. Racial diversity however, is lacking.  82.8% of Los Gatos residents were white…”    3. Why a new paragraph for Asians? And is it  necessary?    4. “…tend to have higher incomes and levels of  educational attainment” – than who?    5. “the minority population has been growing” –  which minority community? Asians? The way  this is presented, the reader assumes the  entire paragraph is about Asians.     6. Why present language proficiency? Does it  matter? The more interesting demographic is  that of (presumably – given the phrase “Most  residents”) ALL Los Gatos residents (if we  mean something else, we need to say so) –  speak a language other than English.  1. This comment has been reflected.  2. This comment has been reflected.  3. The second paragraph was removed per  GPAC direction.  4. The second paragraph was removed per  GPAC direction.  5. The second paragraph was removed per  GPAC direction.  6. The second paragraph was removed per  GPAC direction.    Page 2‐2  Introduction, continued:  These comments have been reflected.   General Plan Policy Document Edit Tracking January 2021   Page 4 of 13  Racial, Social, and Environmental Justice Element  GPAC/Town Comments Corresponding Change  “The themes discussed in this Element lay the  foundation for creating a more equitable and  inclusive environment for all Town residents,  businesses, visitors, and organizations.”  “In addition to those contained in this Element,  equity‐oriented goals and policies can also be  found throughout [] this Plan, particularly in the  Housing, Mobility, and Land Use Elements.”  Disadvantaged Community:   “An area identified by the California  Environmental Protection Agency (CalEPA)  pursuant to Section 39711 of the California  Health and Safety Code, or [] a predominantly  lower income area that is …”  This comment has been reflected.   Socially Disadvantaged Individuals and Groups:  “… or some other bias [] because of their  perceived identity as a member of a particular  group without regard to their individuality and/or  merit.”  This comment has been reflected.   Page 2‐3  2.1 Racial and Social Justice  “This Section identifies goals and policies which  seek to advance Town efforts toward diversity  and inclusivity. Implementation of the action  items presented will allow the Town to monitor  its progress in achieving racial, social, and  environmental justice.”  This comment has been reflected.   RSEJ‐1.1: “Direct? Town services…” This is an  extraordinarily ambitious goal – do we mean, e.g.,  affordable housing?  This comment has been reflected.   RSEJ‐1.3: There are too many “ands” here. And do  we want to include specifics, e.g. hiring goals?  This comment has been reflected.   RSEJ‐1.4: “Develop and invest in arts, education,  and other community programming which  celebrates diversity.”  This comment has been reflected.   RSEJ‐2:  “Respect, protect, and promote (we can’t “fulfill”  – that’s unrealistic) the civil and human rights of  all members of the community.” (delete the  entire “including, but not limited to” phrase –  This comment has been reflected.   General Plan Policy Document Edit Tracking January 2021   Page 5 of 13  Racial, Social, and Environmental Justice Element  GPAC/Town Comments Corresponding Change  we’re either promoting it for “all” or we’re not.  “All” should not include a clarification)  RSEJ‐2.1: “Develop and implement town‐wide  strategies, practices, and services that are  culturally informed (?) and both acknowledge and  reflect diversity.”  This comment has been reflected.   RSEJ‐2.2: “Develop and implement policies,  services, and programs designed to address the  needs of socially disadvantaged and vulnerable  community members.”  This comment has been reflected.   RSEJ‐2.5: A laudable goal, but how is the Town  supposed to collaborate on educational  programs? I can see perhaps elementary, middle,  and high school – but once you get to universities  – it’s tough.  Town Staff has confirmed the direction outlined  in Policy RSEJ‐2.5 and the policy as written will be  maintained.  RSEJ‐2.6: “Develop and implement diversity  training protocols, to include programs  addressing Implicit Bias, for all Town employees  and support similar training efforts undertaken by  the business community.”  This comment has been reflected.   2.2 Environmental Justice:  “Los Gatos is committed to improving the well‐ being of all town residents and those affected by  Town actions in neighboring communities. The  objectives contained in this Section strive to  reduce health risks….” (why start out saying “we  don’t have a problem,” then include an entire  Section addressing the problem??)  This comment has been reflected.   RSEJ‐3:  “Ensure that land use decisions benefit all Los  Gatos residents and do not result in adverse  impacts to socially disadvantaged individuals and  groups.” (something to consider – elsewhere  throughout the Plan, policies are included that  insulate existing neighborhoods from “adverse  impacts” – e.g. no traffic, no tall buildings, no  density, no noise – how is this consistent????  Maybe those other policies need to be  reconsidered…)  This comment has been reflected.   RSEJ‐3.1: “…meaningful involvement of all  stakeholders …”  This comment has been reflected.   General Plan Policy Document Edit Tracking January 2021   Page 6 of 13  Racial, Social, and Environmental Justice Element  GPAC/Town Comments Corresponding Change  RSEJ‐3.2: “…through the development and  implementation of [] project specific mitigation  measures…”  This comment has been reflected.   RSEJ‐3.3.: How do we contemplate “coordinating”  (or “requiring?”) “changes to existing facilities?’  AND I would delete “aesthetic” – this Element is  addressing environmental justice, not whether  something looks nice or not.  The Town does not have the authority to require  utilities to alter site placement. The best the  Town can do is coordinate and have open  dialogue.  The term aesthetic was removed per the  comment.   RSEJ‐4:  Laudable, but how does the town  “ensure” everyone gets healthy food, good  schools, and decent health care? Maybe “actively  advocate to ensure…?”  This comment has been reflected.   RSEJ‐4.2:  “Adopt and implement land use policies,  regulations, and Ordinances which allow for and  promote increased access to healthy food options  (groceries, farmers markets, community  gardens).” (I don’t know about putting in here  that we don’t want fast food outlets that could  impact vulnerable populations)  This comment has been reflected.   RSEJ‐4.3:   “Identify and address gaps in access to  residential, commercial, recreation, education,  and health resources such that these community  assets are available to all.”  This comment has been reflected.   RSEJ‐4.4:   OK – what do we mean by this? For example, the  Town spent $14M repaving the Almond Grove in  concrete – clearly not “equitable.” Does this  imply that capital improvements need to be  prorated to particular geographic areas??  The front end of this policy has been changed to  promote which provides more flexibility. A new  Implementation Program H has been added that  requires the Town to develop a set of criteria to  measure and prioritize Capital Improvement  Projects Town‐wide.    Town Staff has confirmed the direction outlined  in Policy RSEJ‐4.4 and Implementation Program J.  RSEJ‐5:  “Develop, implement, and enforce policies to  ensure access to healthy and safe housing  throughout the community.”  This comment has been reflected.   RSEJ‐5.1:   General Plan Policy Document Edit Tracking January 2021   Page 7 of 13  Racial, Social, and Environmental Justice Element  GPAC/Town Comments Corresponding Change  “Develop and adopt policies, regulations, and  Ordinances which reflect up‐to‐date construction  and safety measures for all residential structures,  while continuing to take enforcement actions for  violation of any municipal or state building and  safety codes.”  RSEJ‐6:  “…and facilitate [] public involvement in….”  This comment has been reflected.   RSEJ‐6.2: I would delete the entire “including but  not limited to…” phrase – we just want to  promote “engagement in town processes.”  This comment has been reflected.   RSEJ‐6.3:  “Brainstorm new and innovative approaches to  facilitate communication between members of  the community and town elected officials and  staff members.”  This comment has been reflected.   RSEJ‐6.6:  “Schedule Town events on different days and  times to encourage and facilitate participation  among community members with work, school,  and other obligations that conflict with more  traditionally scheduling.”  This comment has been reflected.   Introductory Section  If we are going to try to move towards more  affordable housing => more diverse population,  then we should say this in the introduction.   Regardless of the intent, the blue box should be  called 2018 Demographics as the Mayor  suggested.    I would suggest, we do a couple of things in the  blue box and maybe cut down the language  section:   • Compare LG resident demographics to the rest  of the County and perhaps the state.   • Talk about diversity in the business community  and Town staff if we have better diversity in this  area. Because this plan is not just about residents,  it includes businesses, organizations and visitors.  This comment has been reflected.    The title of the blue box has been updated to  reflect the comment.    The second paragraph has been removed in the  blue box per GPAC direction.    Additional ethnic demographics have been added  to compare Los Gatos to Santa Clara County and  the State of California.  General Plan Policy Document Edit Tracking January 2021   Page 8 of 13  Racial, Social, and Environmental Justice Element  GPAC/Town Comments Corresponding Change  RSEJ‐1 I agree with Committee Member Piasecki  that this goal should be qualified for things the  Town has control over.   Should we have a policy about seeking diverse  employment for staff? Maybe we are covered  with laws in the state.  Edits to Goal RSEJ‐1 have been addressed in  other GPAC comments. A new Policy RSEJ‐2.7 has  been added to address a diverse Town staff.   RSEJ 2.3—see my previous comment—this is not  realistic with 82% white population. We can leave  it in but it is a hollow policy generally.  Town Staff has confirmed the direction outlined  in Policy RSEJ‐2.3 and the policy as written will be  maintained.  RSEJ 2.6—I think this type of training should be  expanded to include all Town staff, all Town  leaders (Council) as well as all Boards,  Commissions and Committees.   I would go even further to suggest that we make  awareness/sensitivity training available for all  Town residents. I remember during our July 30  meeting hearing the testimony of residents who  were harassed by other residents while walking  down the street. We may not be able to reach the  residents with the greatest implicit bias, but we  could at least help those who are harassed or  help others that observe this to deal with the  problem.   Finally, should we add a policy or implementation  program to regularly survey residents for  measure of improvement in this area?  Policies RSEJ‐2.6 and RSEJ‐2.8 and  Implementation Programs E and H cover the  topics highlighted in the comments.  RSEJ‐3—I agree with Committee Member  Piasecki—we cannot ensure that land use  decisions benefit ALL residents. Maybe change  ensure to encourage or eliminate ALL and replace  with something else. Also, we cannot say the  second sentence realistically. We will never put  affordable housing (other than ADUs that are  voluntarily deed restricted) in the Hillsides (with  mostly 1 DU per acre) and we will not put  significant density in our predominantly single‐ family neighborhoods, so why say this? It is a  laudable goal, but not realistic.   The policies included seem to be more specific  about environmental issues, so re‐write the goal  accordingly.  Goal RSEJ‐3 has been modified to reflect other  changes proposed by the GPAC.  General Plan Policy Document Edit Tracking January 2021   Page 9 of 13  Racial, Social, and Environmental Justice Element  GPAC/Town Comments Corresponding Change  RSEJ‐4.2 I don’t think we should say that fast food  chains are unhealthy when they do offer healthy  options. Maybe we should evaluate new  restaurants in the permit process to ensure they  offer healthy choices and encourage those that  don’t to add healthy options.   The other issue is affordability of food. Healthy  choices have historically (and are currently) more  expensive than less healthy choices (anyone that  has shopped for organic foods vs. other knows  this). We cannot change the economics but at  least we can encourage healthy options to be  available in every venue possible.  Policy RSEJ‐4.2 has been revised per other GPAC  comments to not inhibit fast food as part of the  General Plan via the Zoning Ordinance.   RSEJ 4.3—How do we address gaps between  neighborhoods and “ensure access”? Similarly,  how do we address gaps in education when we  have no control over the schools? I think this goal  should be rewritten to focus on things we have  control over.  This comment has been addressed by other GPAC  comments.  RSEJ 4.4—Not sure what this means. Does this  mean the capital budget is distributed evenly  through the Town? Based on what? Population?  Would we ever do anything in the Open Space  areas where no one lives?  The front end of this policy has been changed to  promote which provides more flexibility. A new  Implementation Program H has been added that  requires the Town to develop a set of criteria to  measure and prioritize Capital Improvement  Projects Townwide.     Town Staff has confirmed the direction outlined  in Policy RSEJ‐4.4 and Implementation Program J.  RSEJ‐6    While I don’t disagree with this goal, how  goal does this pertain to addressing racial and  social injustice?   Many, not all, of the policies in this section are  general goals we have had for Town government.  Perhaps some of the policies could be tweaked to  encourage participation by marginalized  populations. (e.g. 6.2, 6.3, 6.5).  To emphasize diversity “socially disadvantaged  individuals and groups” was added to the Goal to  make it clearer. The same term/group  identification was added to policies in this  section.   Looking at RSEJ‐ 6.7, should we be considering  translation services in other areas besides public  events? What about Town Council meetings?  Policy RSEJ‐6.7 has been updated to reflect the  comment.  General Plan Policy Document Edit Tracking January 2021   Page 10 of 13  Racial, Social, and Environmental Justice Element  GPAC/Town Comments Corresponding Change  2.4 Implementation Programs  I think my suggestions/questions for A and B were  mentioned in the policies proceeding.   C—I mentioned this earlier—add Town leaders  (Council), Boards, Commissions and Committees.  And then look into ways to provide similar  awareness training opportunities for residents. I  think this is the most important implementation  program of all.   Do we need to add an implementation program  to evaluate need for translation services and to  what level?   Do we need to add an implementation program  for regular outreach/surveys to diverse  populations?  New Implementation Program G has been added  to reflect the comment pertaining to diversity  training for the community.     New Implementation Program L has been added  to reflect the comment pertaining to translations  services.    New Implementation Program E covers the  outreach survey.   Goal RSE J‐1 Should this goal be qualified to  reference those areas where the Town has  control or authority?  To ensure equity, inclusion,  and access to opportunities for all residents  unrelated to Town activities or in areas covered  or preempted by the Federal or State  Government would be impractical.  The term “ensure” is a definitive term that is  difficult to meet. In this case Goal RSEJ‐1 was  modified to shift to the term “support”.  Policy RSEJ‐2.2 I would strike the word “new”  since we should be reviewing existing policies and  programs to ensure they improve the lives of  community members…  Policy RSEJ‐2.2 has been revised per other GPAC  comments.  Policy RSEJ‐2.3  This is going to be difficult since the Town is 88%  white.  How would we measure success of  implementing this policy?  Is 12% diversity okay?    We should add the words “and Town staff”  because hiring is one area that the Town has  control over.    Town Staff has confirmed the direction outlined  in Policy RSEJ‐2.3 and the policy as written will be  maintained.  Goal RSE J‐3 I don’t think the town can ensure  that land use decisions benefit all Los Gatos  residents so why suggest that we can?    The words “or another characteristic” is another  use of a catch‐all phrase that is so broad that it is  meaningless.  Goal RSEJ‐3 has been modified to reflect the  comment as well as comments from other GPAC  members. The phrasing “benefit all Los Gatos  residents” was removed.   General Plan Policy Document Edit Tracking January 2021   Page 11 of 13  Racial, Social, and Environmental Justice Element  GPAC/Town Comments Corresponding Change  Policy RSEJ‐3.2  How do project related conditions control  roadway‐generated air and noise pollution?  The term “roadway generated” was removed and  the policy was left more broad to encompass  both air and noise pollution in general.   Goal RSE J‐4 This goal can be worded better.   Perhaps we should use the wording used in the  introduction statement “promoting better access  to public facilities, healthy food, and safe and  sanitary homes.  Also, again we have a catch‐all  generality “and other amenities.”  What other  amenities?  Goal RSEJ‐4 has been updated per other GPAC  comments.   Policy RSEJ‐4.2  I am concerned about the generalization that  there is a line between healthy food stores and  unhealthy food stores.  Some fast food outlets  sell “healthy choices” and some healthy food  outlets sell unhealthy foods.  Perhaps there is  another way to make the distinction.  Policy RSEJ‐4.2 has been revised per other GPAC  comments to not inhibit fast food as part of the  General Plan via the Zoning Ordinance.   Policy RSEJ‐4.5  Add health care?  Policy RSEJ‐4.5 has been updated to reflect the  comment.  Policy Overview  The RSEJ element should address the issue of  policing programs.  It seems that we should have  a goal of evaluating our local policing program to  ensure the officers are trained in crises  intervention and de‐escalation techniques and  that the department has access to mental health  intervention professionals, when needed.  New policies and programs have been added to  reflect this comment including:   RSEJ‐2.9   RSEJ‐2.10   Implementation Program I   Implementation Program J  Page 2‐1  The Race, Income, and Language in Los Gatos  Section  There is a breakdown of residents by race (White,  Asian, etc.) but the total number adds  up to 111.6%  This comment has been reflected. The numbers  have been updated.  Page 2‐2  Minor text edit in first paragraph, use a colon vs a  comma.  Equity‐oriented goals and policies can also be  found throughout the rest of the General  Plan, including, but not limited to, the Housing  Element…  It should say “but not limited to:”  The first comment has been reflected in text.    The second comment has already been covered  by previous GPAC comments.   General Plan Policy Document Edit Tracking January 2021   Page 12 of 13  Racial, Social, and Environmental Justice Element  GPAC/Town Comments Corresponding Change  Page 2‐3  RSEJ‐1.4 Celebrate Town Diversity  This is a good (and important) policy but there is  no implementation plan for it ‐ it should have  one.  Policy RSEJ‐1.4 has been revised per other GPAC  comments.  MISSING POLICY  I feel like there is a missing policy, something  along the lines of Promote Los Gatos as a Town  That Welcomes all Or maybe Promote Los Gatos  as a Bias‐Free Town Actions matter most, but  actions start with attitude. Sometimes when you  say something often enough it becomes the new  reality. Then people start acting along  those lines.  This comment is reflected in the new Policy RSEJ‐ 1.5.  Page 2‐5  RSEJ‐4‐2 Regulations Allowing Healthy Foods  Good idea but let’s out the part that says  “discouraging unhealthy choices (e.g. fast food  chains) around vulnerable populations.  This is a small town, and anyway we say in the  intro to section 2.2 that we don’t have  any disadvantaged communities. Also, on a  practical basis, I don’t think we should be  dictating in the general plan where any fast food  outlet can go in this town. What is “fast food”  anyway. We all think of McDonalds. But what  about Super Duper Burger? What about the  Happy Hound? What about Main Street Burgers?  Are we going to have special rules for them?  Probably not.  Policy RSEJ‐4.2 has been revised per other GPAC  comments to not inhibit fast food as part of the  General Plan via the Zoning Ordinance.   That we choose our wording realistically. By way  of example, “Ensure” is frequently used as a Goal  in circumstances in which the Town cannot/may  not be able to “ensure.” [“Ensure equity…”]  The term “ensure” was removed and used  sparingly per the comment.   That we evaluate our goals/objectives realistically  and within the Town’s authority. (i.e., J‐1.1  “address any existing inequities”)  This comment has been reflected.  J‐4.2: This entry is another example of the  “Ensure” issue referenced above.  However, in addition to being a difficult objective  to implement, I question whether a distinction  Policy RSEJ‐4.2 has been revised per other GPAC  comments to not inhibit fast food as part of the  General Plan via the Zoning Ordinance.   General Plan Policy Document Edit Tracking January 2021   Page 13 of 13  Racial, Social, and Environmental Justice Element  GPAC/Town Comments Corresponding Change  between “healthy” foods and “fast” foods could  be described, codified and implemented.  GPAC Comments at the 12/3 Meeting  Determine and address any gaps between  neighborhoods and commercial service areas,  recreation facilities, education, medical services,  and other community assets in the Town to  provide equitable access to these assets and  facilitate physical activity in everyday life.   [Source: New Policy]  Policy RSEJ‐4.3 has been updated to reflect the  comment.   Provide Town services and infrastructure  investments to address any existing inequities.   [Source: New Policy]  Policy RSEJ‐1.1 has been updated to reflect the  comment.  Do not use “other characteristic” or “other  amenities”.  The terminology mentioned in the comment has  been removed from the following: Goal RSEJ‐3,  Policy RSEJ‐3.1, Goal RESJ‐4.  Modify RESJ‐3, tweak the Goal. Goal RSEJ‐3 has been modified per other GPAC  comments.   Need a policy on a welcoming Town or  welcoming place, bias free, open arms places.  This comment is reflected in the new Policy RSEJ‐ 1.5.  Add a new policy and program to form Social and  Racial Justice Commission, advisory to Council.  New Implementation Program E has been added  to implement existing Policy RSEJ‐2.4.  Add statistics that compare CA – Santa Clara  County – Los Gatos.  This comment has been addressed in the  Introduction.  Keep the top paragraph and strike the bottom  half in the blue box on the front page.  This comment has been reflected in the blue box  in the introduction to the element.  Bring in Political and Religious Diversity, not just  race, sex, income, and gender.  This comment has been reflected.  Need a new policy that focuses on diversity Town  staff.  This comment is reflected in the new Policy RSEJ‐ 2.7.  Need diversity training for everyone, not just  Town staff.  New Implementation Program G has been added  to implement new Policy RSEJ‐2.8.  Make Civil….civic…not civil. This comment has been reflected.   Policy 6.2 needs to be more diverse and not  focused on youth and adults, focus more on what  the element oriented.  Policy RSEJ‐6.2 has been updated to reflect the  comments using the key term “Socially  Disadvantaged Individuals and Groups.”  Chair believes we should have a reporting  mechanism, like through an annual survey.   New Implementation Program E reflects this  comment.    This Page Intentionally Left Blank