Loading...
Item 2 - Staff Report and Attachments PREPARED BY: SEAN MULLIN, AICP Associate Planner 110 E. Main Street Los Gatos, CA 95030 ● 408-354-6874 www.losgatosca.gov TOWN OF LOS GATOS HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMITTEE REPORT MEETING DATE: 09/23/2020 ITEM NO: 2 DATE: September 17, 2020 TO: Historic Preservation Committee FROM: Joel Paulson, Community Development Director SUBJECT: Preliminary Review for Relocation of an Existing Pre-1941 Single-Family Residence and Construction of a Second-Story Addition Located on Property Zoned R-1:8. APN 510-41-013. Property Owners: Manish Belsare and Rekha Thakur. Applicant: Tom Sloan, Metro Design Group. Project Planner: Sean Mullin RECOMMENDATION: Consider a preliminary review for relocation of an existing pre-1941 single-family residence and construction of a second story addition on property zoned R-1:8 located at 32 Walnut Avenue. PROPERTY DETAILS: 1. Date primary structure was built: 1900 per County Assessor’s Database 2. Town of Los Gatos Historic Status Code: +, historic and intact, worthy of special note 3. Does property have an LHP Overlay? No 4. Is structure in a historic district? No 5. If yes, is it a contributor? N/A 6. Findings required? No 7. Considerations required? Yes BACKGROUND: On May 27, 2020, the Historic Preservation Committee (HPC) considered a request to remove the subject property from the Town’s Historic Resources Inventory (HRI). The Committee was unable to make the findings for removal from the HRI, noting that enough detail was present at the front of the residence to determine that the residence is historic. On August 26, 2020, the HPC conducted a preliminary review of a proposal for relocation of the existing single-story structure and construction of a second story addition. The HPC was PAGE 2 OF 3 SUBJECT: 32 Walnut Avenue DATE: September 17, 2020 N:\DEV\HISTORIC PRESERVATION\HPC Sheets\2020\09-23-20\Item 2 - 32 Walnut Avenue\Staff Report.docx BACKGROUND (continued): generally supportive of the proposal and recommended that the applicant return under formal application and address the following: • Reduce the height of the second-story addition or push it back to avoid it overwhelming the original portion of the residence; and • Incorporate landscape screening to mitigate the visual impact of the proposed addition, specifically on the south elevation. The applicant has revised the development plans and chosen to return to the HPC for an additional preliminary review of the modified proposal. DISCUSSION: As previously proposed, the existing residence would be moved approximately six feet toward the rear of the property and approximately five feet south (Attachments 4). The front portion of the residence (library and porch) would remain, including most of the exterior materials. The proposed two-story addition would be focused behind the front façade and a new basement would be located under a majority of the residence. The proposed addition would be consistent with the style and materials of the front façade to create a cohesive design. In response to the HPC’s recommendations provided at the August 26th meeting, the applicant has revised the proposal as follows: • Reconfigured the second-story roof forms; • Lowered the overall height; • Increased the setback of the second-story addition from the front façade; • Lowered the finished floor level; and • Increased articulation of the second-story addition by stepping the addition in from the lower level. The proposed revisions reduce the size of the second story by approximately 100 square feet resulting in a residence size of approximately 2,643 square feet, not including the basement . The applicant’s Letter of Justification includes a request for what appears to be technical demolition of the rear of the residence to allow for construction of the proposed addition in fire-resistant materials (Attachment 1). The applicant may make that request or a similar request for exemptions from demolition for historic structures when the project returns to the HPC under a Planning application for a recommendation to the deciding body. PAGE 3 OF 3 SUBJECT: 32 Walnut Avenue DATE: September 17, 2020 N:\DEV\HISTORIC PRESERVATION\HPC Sheets\2020\09-23-20\Item 2 - 32 Walnut Avenue\Staff Report.docx CONSIDERATIONS: A. Considerations Sec. 29.80.290. Standards for review. In evaluating applications, the deciding body shall consider the architectural style, design, arrangement, texture, materials and color, and any other pertinent factors. Applications shall not be granted unless: For pre-1941 structures, the proposed work will neither adversely affect the exterior architectural characteristics or other features of the property which is the subject of the application. B. Residential Design Guidelines Section 4.9 of the Town’s Residential Design Guidelines offers recommendations for additions to historic resources through reference to Section 3.9 (Attachment 2). CONCLUSION: The applicant is seeking preliminary feedback from the Committee on the propo sal. The proposed project would respond to the feedback and return to the HPC under a Planning application for a recommendation to the deciding body. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Letter of Justification 2. Section 3.9, Residential Design Guidelines 3. Previous Development Plans – August 26, 2020 4. Current Development Plans – September 23, 2020 This Page Intentionally Left Blank Justification Letter 32 Walnut Avenue, Los Gatos CA 95030 11-September 2020 On May 27th an application was presented to the Historical Preservation Committee requesting to the remove the existing residence located at 32 Walnut Avenue. The Committee was not able to make the required findings and denied the request. HPC feedback from 5/27- The Committee had determined that- a. the front, street facing façade have distinctive characteristics and methods of construction from the Victorian period, b.significant repairs have been made in recent years to the front (street façade), but the identifying character of the window and millwork features are worth preserving, and c. the rear potions of the existing structure had been added on several times, and no longer retains any of the original architectural value. On Aug 26th plans for a remodeling project were presented to the HPC, seeking a preliminary review and feedback from the HPC on this project ahead of submitting the required A&S application. HPC feedback from 8/26- The Committee had recommended the following changes to the proposed plans- i) a 2-story gable behind the street-facing library should be pushed backwards, allowing the original historic structure to be more prominent, ii)some architectural element/s can be added to the south facing wall, to break the appearance of a monolithic wall With this application, we are making the following requests to the HPC- 1.That the proposed plans for 32 Walnut preserve the historic character of the current structure and serve as an acceptable addition/ remodel. 2.The many wildfires all around us in recent weeks are a stark reminder that fire-hardened homes are important for the safety of our community, and this is an opportune moment for the proposed project on 32 Walnut to incorporate fire safety. A few days ago, the Town of Los Gatos (facilitated by the Town Attorney Robert Schultz) signed an agreement with owners of the property located at 94 Hernandez Ave which requires the owner to demolish the current pre-1941 structure, and any new structure that is subsequently proposed on that lot will still require HPC oversight. Following this precedent, we are requesting a similar accommodation for 32 Walnut that will allow us to rebuild the proposed project with Class-A fire resistant materials and construction materials/ techniques that will be ember resistant. We can thus significantly enhance fire safety of the new structure as well as that of the neighborhood, while still ensuring HPC oversight to retain the historic characteristics of the original structure. ATTACHMENT 1 In support of request #1 above, the attached revised plans for this project now incorporate HPC feedback (from 26-Aug meeting) in the following ways- 1. The total built-up area for the project (including the main floor and upper floor) is now reduced by ~100 sq ft to 2,643 sq ft. 2. The ridge line of the gabled roof behind the library has been lowered to a height of 3’-9” above the library’s ridge line and is now setback 24 ft. from the façade of the library.This single story gabled roof serves as a transition to the 2-storey addition in the back half of the project. 3. The proposed floor levels now step down an additional 1’-2” lower than the plans submitted last month following the the contours of the site more closely. The maximum height of the proposed building is now reduced to 28’-10” ft. (was 30 ft. in the previous submission). This design element significantly diminishes the view of the proposed structure from the street. 4. On the south facing exterior wall, the walls of the upper level have been redesigned to create a 3’-9” offset and new roof element to break up the vertical massing. Additionally, a window element has been added, to break the monolith appearance. The following elements of the project have been retained from the old version, allowing us to retain the distinctive characteristics and architectural elements from the Victorian period- 5. We will retain the entire primary building façade and all surrounding wall elements. All the south-facing exterior walls and siding within the porch will be retained. We will also retain that entire section of the north-facing exterior wall that envelopes the street-facing room. 6. All exterior materials on the front façade, including the wood trims around the two windows and millwork features, will be retained. The detailing of the new additions will match precisely the detailing from the front façade and create an integrated building design. 7. The architectural style, characteristics, building materials and millwork that is present in the front portion of the existing building will be replicated and duplicated throughout the entire new addition. Roof slope and architectural detailing based upon the original structure are now incorporated throughout the main residence. 8. Similar to the existing residence, the proposed residence will integrate porch elements that help diminish the overall vertical massing. The porch elements are located on the rear elevation and the north façade. We believe that the proposed plans fully embody the HPC guidance in letter and spirit and will preserve the distinctive characteristics of the current structure. Thank you. Sincerely, Tom Sloan AIA Metro Design Group Residential Design Guidelines 33 Town of Los Gatos BUILDING DESIGN3 3.8.3 Use traditional detailing •Treat openings in walls as though they were constructed of the traditional material for the style. For example, be sure to provide substantial wall space above arches in stucco and stone walls. Traditionally, wall space above the arch would have been necessary to structurally span the opening, and to make the space too small is inconsistent with the archi- tectural style. •Openings in walls faced with stone, real or synthetic, should have defined lintels above the opening except in Mission or Spanish Eclectic styles. Lintels may be stone, brick or wood as suits the style of the house. •Treat synthetic materials as though they were authentic. For example, select synthetic stone patterns that place the individual stones in a horizontal plane as they would have been in a load bearing masonry wall. •Select roof materials that are consistent with the traditional architectural style (e.g., avoid concrete roof tiles on a Crafts- man Style house.) 3.8.4 Materials changes •Make materials and color changes at inside corners rather than outside corners to avoid a pasted on look. 3.9 ADDITIONS/ACCESSORY BUILDINGS/SECONDARY UNITS •Site additions in the least conspicuous place. In many cases this is a rear or side elevation - only rarely is it a rooftop. •The existing built forms, components and materials should be reinforced. Heights and proportions of additions and alterations should be consistent with and continue the original architectural style and design. •Additions should be subordinate, and compatible in scale and proportion to the historically significant portions of the existing structure. •When an addition or remodel requires the use of newly constructed exterior elements, they should be identical in size, dimension, shape and location as the original, and Use stone or wood lintels over openings in stone walls Additions, accessory buildings and secondary units should match the form, architectural style, and details of the original house ATTACHMENT 2 Residential Design Guidelines34 Town of Los Gatos BUILDING DESIGN3 should utilize the same materials as the existing protected exterior elements. • When an addition necessitates the removal of architectural materials, such as siding, windows, doors, and decorative elements, they should be carefully removed and reused in the addition where possible. • The introduction of window and door openings not char- acteristic in proportion, scale, or style with the original architecture is strongly discouraged (e.g., sliding windows or doors in a structure characterized by double hung windows and swinging doors). • The character of any addition or alteration should be in keeping with and subordinate to the integrity of the original structure. • The amount of foundation exposed on the addition should match that of the original building. • Do not add roof top additions where the roof is of historic significance. • Second floor additions are discouraged in neighborhoods with largely one story homes. If horizontal expansion of the house is not possible, consider incorporating a second floor addition within the roof form as shown in the example to the left. • Second floor additions which are not embedded within the roof form should be located to the rear of the structure. • The height and proportion of an addition or a second story should not dominate the original structure. • Deck additions should be placed to the rear of the struc- ture only, and should be subordinate in terms of scale and detailing. • New outbuildings, such as garages, should be clearly subor- dinate to the main structure in massing, and should utilize forms, materials and details which are similar to the main structure. • Garages should generally be located to the rear of the lot behind the rear wall of the residence. One car wide access driveways should be utilized. Original structure Addition incorporated into the roof successfully adds space while respecting the integrity of the existing house and the scale of the neighborhood Placing a two story addition to the rear can minimize its impact on the historic resource and the scale of the neighborhood METRO GROUP DESIGN DATE : SCALE : PROJECT NO : DRAWN BY : A-1.0 Belsare Thakur 8-2-20.pln8/14/202012:05 PMThe plans, ideas and design on this drawing are the property of the designer,divised solely for this contract. Plans shall not be used, in whole or in part, for any purpose for which they were not intended without the written permission of METRO DESIGN GROUP. c REVISIONS ARCHITECTURE PLANNING INTERIORS.. 1475 S. BASCOM AVE SUITE 208 CAMPBELL, CA 95008 (408)871-1071 phone (408)871-1072 fax www.metroarchitects.com SHEET NUMBER 32 WALNUT AVENUE LSO GATOS, CA 95030-6818 CHECKED BY :TS ARCHITECT :TOM SLOAN PROJECT NAME 20687 BELSARE & THAKUR RESIDENCE 8-14-20 EXISITNG SHED TO BE REMOVED EXISITNG TREES TO BE REMOVED EXISITNG TREES TO BE REMOVED LINE OF EXISTING RESIDENCE TO BE MOVED AND REMODELED W A L N U T A V E .N 84 32'56" W 170.00 N 84 32'56" W 170.00 N 5 24'00" W 50.02'N 5 24'00" W 50.02'UP PROPOSED TWO-CAR GARAGE LIGHT WELL TERRACE DECK HATCHED AREA DENOTES PORTION OF EXISTING RESIDENCE TO REMAIN NEW DRIVEWAY ADDITION TO EXISITNG RELOCATED RESIDENCE NEW DRIVEWAY PORCH 25 FT. FRONT YARD SETBACK (PROPOSED) 19 FT. FRONT YARD SETBACK ( EXISTING) redwood TS PROPOSED SITE PLAN PROPOSED STREET ELEVATIONEXISITNG STREET ELEVATION SCALE 1" = 10' ATTACHMENT 3 METRO GROUP DESIGN DATE : SCALE : PROJECT NO : DRAWN BY : A-2.0 Belsare Thakur 8-2-20.pln8/14/202012:08 PMThe plans, ideas and design on this drawing are the property of the designer,divised solely for this contract. Plans shall not be used, in whole or in part, for any purpose for which they were not intended without the written permission of METRO DESIGN GROUP. c REVISIONS ARCHITECTURE PLANNING INTERIORS.. 1475 S. BASCOM AVE SUITE 208 CAMPBELL, CA 95008 (408)871-1071 phone (408)871-1072 fax www.metroarchitects.com SHEET NUMBER 32 WALNUT AVENUE LSO GATOS, CA 95030-6818 CHECKED BY :TS ARCHITECT :TOM SLOAN PROJECT NAME 20687 BELSARE & THAKUR RESIDENCE 8-14-201,016.9 sq ftLIBRARY PORCH UP UPDOWN LAUNDRY ROOM BEDROOM 3 BATHDINING ROOM KITCHENFAMILY ROOM ETHANOLFIREPLACEPANTRY WASHER DRYER LINENLINENUP LIGHT WELL TERRACE DECK TRASH CANS UPMETERS BUILT - IN DESK DENOTES WALLS FROM EXISTING RESIDENCE TO REMAIN DENOTES PROPOSED WALLS (TYPICAL) DENOTES OULINE OF ORIGINAL RESIDNECE UNSHADED AREA REPRESENTS PORTION OF THE ORIGINAL RESIDENCE TO REMAIN SHADED AREAS REPRESENTS THE NEW ADDITION BEDROOM 3 BATH 3 OPEN TO BELOW LOFT YOGA ROOM MASTER BEDROOM SITTING AREAMASTER BATHROOM WALK IN CLOSET WALK IN CLOSET ETHANOLFIREPLACEWALK IN CLOSET DENOTES PROPOSED WALLS (TYPICAL) MURPHY BED THEATRE BONUS ROOMAIRCOND.BUILT IN CLO. UP LIGHT WELL RECREATION ROOMGYM CLOSET BATH 4 MECHANICAL ROOM UPUP LIGHT WELL BUILT IN BUILT IN CLO. DENOTES PROPOSED WALLS (TYPICAL) FLOOR PLANS LOWER FLOOR PLAN MAIN FLOOR PLAN UPPER FLOOR PLAN 1/4"=1'-0" TS METRO GROUP DESIGN DATE : SCALE : PROJECT NO : DRAWN BY : A-3.0 Belsare Thakur 8-2-20.pln8/14/202012:05 PMThe plans, ideas and design on this drawing are the property of the designer,divised solely for this contract. Plans shall not be used, in whole or in part, for any purpose for which they were not intended without the written permission of METRO DESIGN GROUP. c REVISIONS ARCHITECTURE PLANNING INTERIORS.. 1475 S. BASCOM AVE SUITE 208 CAMPBELL, CA 95008 (408)871-1071 phone (408)871-1072 fax www.metroarchitects.com SHEET NUMBER 32 WALNUT AVENUE LSO GATOS, CA 95030-6818 CHECKED BY :TS ARCHITECT :TOM SLOAN PROJECT NAME 20687 BELSARE & THAKUR RESIDENCE 8-14-20 N8:12PITCH8:12PITCH8:12 PITCH8:12PITCH8:12PITCH8:12 PITCH 8:12 PITCH 8:12 PITCH 8:12 PITCH 8:12 PITCH 8:12 PITCH 8:12 PITCH 4:12 PITCH 4:12 PITCH4:12 PITCH 4:12PITCH4:12PITCHSHADED AREA INDICATES EXISTING ROOF TO REMAIN ALL ROOFING MATERIAL TO BE STANDING SEAM METAL ROOF (TYPICAL) ROOF PLAN TS METRO GROUP DESIGN DATE : SCALE : PROJECT NO : DRAWN BY : A-4.0 Belsare Thakur 8-2-20.pln8/14/202012:05 PMThe plans, ideas and design on this drawing are the property of the designer,divised solely for this contract. Plans shall not be used, in whole or in part, for any purpose for which they were not intended without the written permission of METRO DESIGN GROUP. c REVISIONS ARCHITECTURE PLANNING INTERIORS.. 1475 S. BASCOM AVE SUITE 208 CAMPBELL, CA 95008 (408)871-1071 phone (408)871-1072 fax www.metroarchitects.com SHEET NUMBER 32 WALNUT AVENUE LSO GATOS, CA 95030-6818 CHECKED BY :TS ARCHITECT :TOM SLOAN PROJECT NAME 20687 BELSARE & THAKUR RESIDENCE 8-14-20 EXISTING SHINGLE SIDING TO REMAIN EXISTING WOOD TRIM TO REMAIN EXISTING WOOD WINDOWS AND TRIM TO REMAIN EXISTING HORIZONTAL WOOD SIDING TO REMAIN EXISTING ROOF AND FACIA TO REMAIN NEW SHINGLE SIDING TO MATCH EXISTING EXISTING WINDOW TO REMAIN NEW STANDING SEAM METAL ROOFING (TYP) EXISTING GUTTERS TO REMAIN WTIH NEW PITCHED ROOF TO REPLACE EXISTING FLAT ROOF NEW SECOND STORY ADDITION TS 1/4" = 1'-0" PROPOSED EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS EAST (REAR) ELEVATION WEST (FRONT) ELEVATIONNORTH (SIDE) ELEVATION SOUTH (SIDE) ELEVATION METRO GROUP DESIGN DATE : SCALE : PROJECT NO : DRAWN BY : A-1.0 Belsare Thakur 9-11-20.pln9/11/20205:22 PMThe plans, ideas and design on this drawing are the property of the designer,divised solely for this contract. Plans shall not be used, in whole or in part, for any purpose for which they were not intended without the written permission of METRO DESIGN GROUP. c REVISIONS ARCHITECTURE PLANNING INTERIORS.. 1475 S. BASCOM AVE SUITE 208 CAMPBELL, CA 95008 (408)871-1071 phone (408)871-1072 fax www.metroarchitects.com SHEET NUMBER 32 WALNUT AVENUE LSO GATOS, CA 95030-6818 CHECKED BY :TS ARCHITECT :TOM SLOAN PROJECT NAME 20687 BELSARE & THAKUR RESIDENCE 9-11-20 EXISITNG SHED TO BE REMOVED EXISITNG TREES TO BE REMOVED EXISITNG TREES TO BE REMOVED LINE OF EXISTING RESIDENCE TO BE MOVED AND REMODELED W A L N U T A V E .N 84 32'56" W 170.00 N 84 32'56" W 170.00 N 5 24'00" W 50.02'N 5 24'00" W 50.02'UP PROPOSED TWO-CAR GARAGE LIGHT WELL TERRACE DECK HATCHED AREA DENOTES PORTION OF EXISTING RESIDENCE TO REMAIN NEW DRIVEWAY ADDITION TO EXISITNG RELOCATED RESIDENCE NEW DRIVEWAY PORCH 25 FT. FRONT YARD SETBACK (PROPOSED) 19 FT. FRONT YARD SETBACK ( EXISTING) redwood TS PROPOSED SITE PLAN PROPOSED STREET ELEVATIONEXISITNG STREET ELEVATION SCALE 1" = 10' ATTACHMENT 4 METRO GROUP DESIGN DATE : SCALE : PROJECT NO : DRAWN BY : A-2.0 Belsare Thakur 9-11-20.pln9/11/20205:22 PMThe plans, ideas and design on this drawing are the property of the designer,divised solely for this contract. Plans shall not be used, in whole or in part, for any purpose for which they were not intended without the written permission of METRO DESIGN GROUP. c REVISIONS ARCHITECTURE PLANNING INTERIORS.. 1475 S. BASCOM AVE SUITE 208 CAMPBELL, CA 95008 (408)871-1071 phone (408)871-1072 fax www.metroarchitects.com SHEET NUMBER 32 WALNUT AVENUE LSO GATOS, CA 95030-6818 CHECKED BY :TS ARCHITECT :TOM SLOAN PROJECT NAME 20687 BELSARE & THAKUR RESIDENCE 9-11-20 LIBRARY PORCH UP UPDOWN LAUNDRY ROOM BEDROOM 3 BATHDINING ROOM KITCHEN FAMILY ROOM ETHANOLFIREPLACEPANTRY WASHER DRYER LINENLINENUP LIGHT WELL TERRACE DECK TRASH CANS UPMETERS BUILT - IN DESK DENOTES WALLS FROM EXISTING RESIDENCE TO REMAIN DENOTES PROPOSED WALLS (TYPICAL) DENOTES OULINE OF ORIGINAL RESIDNECE UNSHADED AREA REPRESENTS PORTION OF THE ORIGINAL RESIDENCE TO REMAIN SHADED AREAS REPRESENTS THE NEW ADDITION UP REF 18'-0" X 18'-0" 11'-0" X 16'-0" LIGHT WELL LIGHT WELL BEDROOM 3 BATH 3 OPEN TO BELOW YOGA ROOM MASTER BEDROOM SITTING AREA MASTER BATHROOM WALK IN CLOSET WALK IN CLOSET ETHANOLFIREPLACEWALK IN CLOSET UP12'-6" X 13'-8" 14'-8" X 16'-8" 4'-0" X 7'-0" 7'-6" X 7'-0" 5'-9" X 10'-2" MURPHY BED THEATRE BONUS ROOMAIRCOND.BUILT IN UP LIGHT WELL RECREATION ROOM GYM CLOSET BATH 4 MECHANICAL ROOM UPUP LIGHT WELL BUILT IN BUILT IN CLO. DENOTES PROPOSED WALLS (TYPICAL) UP AIRCOND.LIGHT WELL FLOOR PLANS LOWER FLOOR PLAN MAIN FLOOR PLAN UPPER FLOOR PLAN 1/4"=1'-0" TS 1,602 SF1,041 SF 1,360 SF METRO GROUP DESIGN DATE : SCALE : PROJECT NO : DRAWN BY : A-3.0 Belsare Thakur 9-11-20.pln9/11/20205:22 PMThe plans, ideas and design on this drawing are the property of the designer,divised solely for this contract. Plans shall not be used, in whole or in part, for any purpose for which they were not intended without the written permission of METRO DESIGN GROUP. c REVISIONS ARCHITECTURE PLANNING INTERIORS.. 1475 S. BASCOM AVE SUITE 208 CAMPBELL, CA 95008 (408)871-1071 phone (408)871-1072 fax www.metroarchitects.com SHEET NUMBER 32 WALNUT AVENUE LSO GATOS, CA 95030-6818 CHECKED BY :TS ARCHITECT :TOM SLOAN PROJECT NAME 20687 BELSARE & THAKUR RESIDENCE 9-11-20 N8:12 PITCH 8:12 PITCH 0.5:12 PITCH 0.5:12PITCH8:12PITCH8:12PITCH8:12PITCH8:12PITCH8:12PITCH8:12PITCH8:12 PITCH 8:12 PITCH 8:12 PITCH 8:12 PITCH 4:12 PITCH 8:12 PITCH 8:12 PITCH8:12PITCH8:12PITCH8:12PITCHROOF PLAN TS 1/4" = 1'-0" METRO GROUP DESIGN DATE : SCALE : PROJECT NO : DRAWN BY : A-4.0 Belsare Thakur 9-11-20.pln9/11/20205:22 PMThe plans, ideas and design on this drawing are the property of the designer,divised solely for this contract. Plans shall not be used, in whole or in part, for any purpose for which they were not intended without the written permission of METRO DESIGN GROUP. c REVISIONS ARCHITECTURE PLANNING INTERIORS.. 1475 S. BASCOM AVE SUITE 208 CAMPBELL, CA 95008 (408)871-1071 phone (408)871-1072 fax www.metroarchitects.com SHEET NUMBER 32 WALNUT AVENUE LSO GATOS, CA 95030-6818 CHECKED BY :TS ARCHITECT :TOM SLOAN PROJECT NAME 20687 BELSARE & THAKUR RESIDENCE 9-11-20 EXISTING SHINGLE SIDING TO REMAIN EXISTING WOOD TRIM TO REMAIN EXISTING WOOD WINDOWS AND TRIM TO REMAIN EXISTING HORIZONTAL WOOD SIDING TO REMAIN EXISTING ROOF AND FACIA TO REMAIN NEW SHINGLE SIDING TO MATCH EXISTING EXISTING WINDOW TO REMAIN NEW STANDING SEAM METAL ROOFING (TYP) EXISTING GUTTERS TO REMAIN WTIH NEW PITCHED ROOF TO REPLACE EXISTING FLAT ROOF NEW SECOND STORY ADDITION TS PROPOSED EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS EAST (REAR) ELEVATION WEST (FRONT) ELEVATIONNORTH (SIDE) ELEVATION SOUTH (SIDE) ELEVATION MAXIMUM HEIGHT28'-10"MAXIMUM HEIGHT28'-10"