Loading...
Item 2 - Staff Report and Attachments 1 - 6, Addendum and Attachment 1PREPARED BY: SEAN MULLIN, AICP Associate Planner 110 E. Main Street Los Gatos, CA 95030 ● 408-354-6874 www.losgatosca.gov TOWN OF LOS GATOS HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMITTEE REPORT MEETING DATE: 06/26/2019 ITEM NO: 2 DATE: JUNE 21, 2019 TO: HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMITTEE FROM: JOEL PAULSON, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR SUBJECT: PROJECT LOCATION: 62 ELLENWOOD AVENUE. PROPERTY OWNER: LISA AND CASE SWENSON. APPLICANT: KURT SIMROCK. REQUESTING APPROVAL FOR REMOVAL OF A PRE-1941 PROPERTY FROM THE HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY ON PROPERTY ZONED R-1:12. APN 510-20-068. RECOMMENDATION: Review the information provided and make a determination regarding the historical significance or architectural merit of the property. PROPERTY DETAILS: 1.Date primary structure was built: 1925 2.Town of Los Gatos Historic Status Code: N 3.Does property have an LHP Overlay? No 4.Is structure in a historic district? No 5.If yes, is it a contributor? N/A 6.Findings required? Yes 7.Considerations required? No BACKGROUND: On March 27, 2019, the applicant requested approval to remove the pre-1941 residence from the Historic Resources Inventory and provided Department of Parks and Recreation forms indicating that the property is not significant as it has been enlarged and altered and does not meet the criteria for integrity. At the meeting, the Historic Preservation Committee (Committee) discussed the matter, requested more information regarding the integrity of the PAGE 2 OF 3 SUBJECT: 62 ELLENWOOD AVENUE JUNE 21, 2019 N:\DEV\HISTORIC PRESERVATION\HPC Sheets\2019\Ellenwood 62 - 06-26-19.docx residence, and continued the matter to April 24, 2019. At the request of the applicant, the matter was subsequently continued to May 12, 2019 and June 26, 2019 to allow the applicant more time to prepare materials. The property has been previously reviewed by the Committee for exterior changes including the enclosure of a portion of an existing front porch. PROJECT SUMMARY: The applicant is requesting approval to remove the pre-1941 residence from the Historic Resources Inventory. DISCUSSION: The applicant has provided an updated Letter of Justification (Attachment 1), which outlines reasons for the request, and the following attachments supporting the request: • Exhibits showing the modifications to the residence over time (Attachment 2); • Exhibit and photos showing the changes to residences within the neighborhood over time (Attachment 3); • An updated Department of Parks and Recreation (DPR) forms indicating that the property is not significant as it has been enlarged and altered and does not meet the criteria for integrity (Attachment 4); • A Structural Conditions Report (Attachment 5); and • An Exterior Architectural Evaluation report (Attachment 6). ACTION: Findings related to a request for a determination that a pre-1941 primary structure has no historic significance or architectural merit. In evaluating a request for a determination of historic significance or architectural merit, the Historic Preservation Committee shall consider the following: 1. The structure is not associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the Town; 2. No Significant persons are associated with the site; 3. There are no distinctive characteristics of type, period or method of construction or representation of work of a master; 4. The structure does not yield information to Town history; or 5. The integrity has been compromised such that the structure no longer has the potential to convey significance. PAGE 3 OF 3 SUBJECT: 62 ELLENWOOD AVENUE JUNE 21, 2019 N:\DEV\HISTORIC PRESERVATION\HPC Sheets\2019\Ellenwood 62 - 06-26-19.docx Should the Committee find merit in the request, the property would be removed from the Historic Resources Inventory and review of design changes or demolition would not return to the Committee. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Letter of Justification 2. Exhibits showing the modifications to the residence 3. Exhibit and photos of changes to residences within the neighborhood 4. Updated Department of Parks and Recreation form 5. Structural Conditions Report 6. Exterior Architectural Evaluation report Distribution: Lisa and Case Swenson, 62 Ellenwood Avenue, Los Gatos CA 95030 Kurt Simrock, 329 Bryant Street 3C, San Francisco CA 94107 This Page Intentionally Left Blank ATTACHMENT 1 ATTACHMENT 2 ATTACHMENT 3 ATTACHMENT 4 Page 19 of 31 *Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder) 62 Ellenwood Ave., Los Gatos*Recorded by: Urban Programmers *Date 3/5/2019 X Continuation Update DPR 523L (Rev. 1/1995)(Word 9/2013) State of California  Natural Resources Agency Primary# DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI # Trinomial CONTINUATION SHEET Property Name: ____62 Ellenwood Ave., Los Gatos the American Revolution) from 1933-1935. In the 1940 U.S. Census, Harry was 70 years old and listed his occupation as farmer, while still living on Ellenwood Avenue. Blanche Beckwith passed away on May 7, 1958. Harry moved to Olympic Drive and died in 1966. Both Harry and Blanche are buried in the Los Gatos Memorial Cemetery. It appears that Harry Beckwith was related to Nathan E. Beckwith, a developer and orchardist in Los Gatos who developed the Beckwith Block on Main Street in 1893. Research did not find a connection between the Beckwith Block and Harry Beckwith. Dr. Leonard J. and Elizabeth A. Levine were the owners of 62 Ellenwood Avenue when the 1989 Loma Prieta Earthquake severely damaged the house. The additions, alterations, and repairs were undertaken by the Levines and completed in 1991. In 2006 Case and Lisa Swenson purchased the property and added to it by constructing the garage building in the front and adding the stone to columns in the front, side fence, garage, and recreation room in the rear which was also constructed by the Swensons. They also modified portions of the building and spaces inside the building. Other occupants or residents were not presented in this report because they were not residents more than 50 years ago. Policy and Regulations: California Register of Historical Resources (CRHR)2 The California Register of Historical Resources is “an authoritative listing and guide to be used by state and local agencies, private groups and citizens in identifying the existing historical resources of the state and to indicate which resources deserve to be protected, to the extent prudent and feasible, from 2 Brown tone print is taken from the pamphlet; “California Register of Historical Resources and CEQA”- California Office of Historic Preservation Page 20 of 31 *Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder) 62 Ellenwood Ave., Los Gatos*Recorded by: Urban Programmers *Date 3/5/2019 X Continuation Update DPR 523L (Rev. 1/1995)(Word 9/2013) State of California  Natural Resources Agency Primary# DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI # Trinomial CONTINUATION SHEET Property Name: ____62 Ellenwood Ave., Los Gatos substantial adverse change”(Public Resources Code Section 5024.1[a]). The criteria for eligibility to the California Register are based on National Register criteria (Public Resources Code Section 5024.1[b]). Certain resources are determined by the statute to be automatically included in the California Register, including California properties formally determined eligible for or listed in the National Register. To be eligible for the California Register as a historical resource, a prehistoric or historic-period resource must be significant at the local or state level under one or more of the following criteria: 1 It is associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of local or regional history, or the cultural heritage of California or the United States; The property at 62 Ellenwood Avenue, a rambling single-family house, is not associated with events that contributed to the broad patterns of local or regional history, or the cultural heritage of California. 2. It is associated with the lives of persons important to local, California, or national history; The subject property is associated with Harry Beckwith who was a partner in Bond and Beckwith, a grocery business from 1896 until 1924, after which Harry joined the Riggs Real Estate Company. At age 70, he was listed in the City Directory as a farmer. Harry Beckwith was a businessman involved in the community. However, he was not a person significant in local, California, or national history. 3. It embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, region, or method of construction, or represents the work of a master, or possesses high artistic values; or The house and garages are designed in a vernacular style, merging Spanish Revival Eclectic and Colonial Revival styles, circa 1925-2006. They embody construction after Page 21 of 31 *Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder) 62 Ellenwood Ave., Los Gatos*Recorded by: Urban Programmers *Date 3/5/2019 X Continuation Update DPR 523L (Rev. 1/1995)(Word 9/2013) State of California  Natural Resources Agency Primary# DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI # Trinomial CONTINUATION SHEET Property Name: ____62 Ellenwood Ave., Los Gatos the 1989 earthquake including additions and remodeling that is not distinctive of a type, period, region or method of construction. It does not represent the work of a master or possess high artistic values. The majority of the building was remodeled or added after 1989. 4. It has yielded, or has the potential to yield, information important to the prehistory or history of the local area, California, or the nation. The site is not near a waterway and has been graded for construction and landscaping. It is unlikely to yield information important to the history or prehistory of the area. The building is primarily recent construction and cannot yield important information from history. Finding: The property at 62 Ellenwood Avenue does not meet the criteria to be listed in the California Register of Historical Resources. For a resource to be eligible for the California Register, it must also retain enough integrity to be recognizable as a historical resource and to convey its significance Although the property at 62 Ellenwood Avenue is not found to be significant, a comparison to the aspects of integrity is included to show the building has been enlarged and altered and does not meet the criteria for retaining integrity. Integrity: Integrity is the ability of a property to convey its significance. To be listed in the National Register of Historic Places, a property must not only be shown to be significant under the National Register criteria, but it also must have integrity. The evaluation of integrity is something of a subjective judgment, but it must always be grounded in an Page 22 of 31 *Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder) 62 Ellenwood Ave., Los Gatos*Recorded by: Urban Programmers *Date 3/5/2019 X Continuation Update DPR 523L (Rev. 1/1995)(Word 9/2013) State of California  Natural Resources Agency Primary# DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI # Trinomial CONTINUATION SHEET Property Name: ____62 Ellenwood Ave., Los Gatos understanding of a property’s physical features and how they relate to its significance. Historic properties either retain integrity (convey their significance) or they do not. Within the concept of integrity, the National Register criteria recognizes seven aspects or qualities that, in various combinations, define integrity. To retain historic integrity, a property will always possess several, and usually most, of the aspects. The retention of specific aspects of integrity is paramount for a property to convey its significance. Determining which of the aspects are most important to a particular property requires knowing why, where, and when the property is significant. The following defines the seven aspects and how they combine to produce integrity. A rule of thumb is to consider whether the original owner would recognize the building and how it functioned. SEVEN APSECTS OF INTEGRITY 3 Location Location is the place where the historic property was constructed or the place where the historic event occurred. The relationship between the property and its location is often important to understanding why the property was created or why something happened. The actual location of a historic property, complemented by its setting, is particularly important in recapturing the sense of historic events and persons. Except in rare cases, the relationship between a property and its historic associations is destroyed if the property is moved. Design Design is the combination of elements that create the form, plan, space, structure, and style of a property. It results from conscious decisions made during the original conception and 3 The aspects of integrity are designed to include buildings, sites and objects. The aspects included here are modified to apply to the subject property. Page 23 of 31 *Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder) 62 Ellenwood Ave., Los Gatos*Recorded by: Urban Programmers *Date 3/5/2019 X Continuation Update DPR 523L (Rev. 1/1995)(Word 9/2013) State of California  Natural Resources Agency Primary# DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI # Trinomial CONTINUATION SHEET Property Name: ____62 Ellenwood Ave., Los Gatos planning of a property (or its significant alteration) and applies to activities as diverse as community planning, engineering, architecture, and landscape architecture. Design includes such elements as organization of space, proportion, scale, technology, ornamentation, and materials. A property's design reflects historic functions and technologies as well as aesthetics. It includes such considerations as the structural system; massing; arrangement of spaces; pattern of fenestration; textures and colors of surface materials; type, amount, and style of ornamental detailing; and arrangement and type of plantings in a designed landscape. Setting Setting is the physical environment of a historic property. Whereas location refers to the specific place where a property was built or an event occurred, setting refers to the character of the place in which the property played its historical role. It involves how, not just where, the property is situated and its relationship to surrounding features and open space. Setting often reflects the basic physical conditions under which a property was built and the functions it was intended to serve. In addition, the way in which a property is positioned in its environment can reflect the designer's concept of nature and aesthetic preferences. The physical features that constitute the setting of a historic property can be either natural or manmade, including such elements as: Topographic features (a gorge or the crest of a hill); Vegetation; Simple manmade features (paths or fences); and Relationships between buildings and other features or open space. These features and their relationships should be examined not only within the exact boundaries of the property, but also between the property and its surroundings. This is particularly important for districts. Materials Page 24 of 31 *Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder) 62 Ellenwood Ave., Los Gatos*Recorded by: Urban Programmers *Date 3/5/2019 X Continuation Update DPR 523L (Rev. 1/1995)(Word 9/2013) State of California  Natural Resources Agency Primary# DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI # Trinomial CONTINUATION SHEET Property Name: ____62 Ellenwood Ave., Los Gatos Materials are the physical elements that were combined or deposited during a particular period of time and in a particular pattern or configuration to form a historic property. The choice and combination of materials reveal the preferences of those who created the property and indicate the availability of particular types of materials and technologies. Indigenous materials are often the focus of regional building traditions and thereby help define an area's sense of time and place. A property must retain the key exterior materials dating from the period of its historic significance. If the property has been rehabilitated, the historic materials and significant features must have been preserved. The property must also be an actual historical resource, not a re-creation; a recent structure fabricated to look historic is not eligible. Likewise, a property whose historic features and materials have been lost and then reconstructed is usually not eligible. Workmanship Workmanship is the physical evidence of the crafts of a particular culture or people during any given period in history or prehistory. It is the evidence of artisans' labor and skill in constructing or altering a building, structure, object, or site. Workmanship can apply to the property as a whole or its individual components. It can be expressed in vernacular methods of construction and plain finishes or in highly sophisticated configurations and ornamental detailing. It can be based on common traditions or innovative period techniques. Workmanship is important because it can furnish evidence of the technology of a craft, illustrate the aesthetic principles of a historic or prehistoric period, and reveal individual, local, regional, or national applications of both technological practices and aesthetic principles. Examples of workmanship in historic buildings include tooling, carving, painting, graining, turning, and joinery. Feeling Page 25 of 31 *Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder) 62 Ellenwood Ave., Los Gatos*Recorded by: Urban Programmers *Date 3/5/2019 X Continuation Update DPR 523L (Rev. 1/1995)(Word 9/2013) State of California  Natural Resources Agency Primary# DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI # Trinomial CONTINUATION SHEET Property Name: ____62 Ellenwood Ave., Los Gatos Feeling is a property's expression of the aesthetic or historic sense of a particular period of time. It results from the presence of physical features that, taken together, convey the property's historic character. For example, a rural historic district retaining original design, materials, workmanship, and setting will relate the feeling of agricultural life in the 19th century. Association Association is the direct link between an important historic event or person and a historic property. A property retains association if it is the place where the event or activity occurred and is sufficiently intact to convey that relationship to an observer. Like feeling, association requires the presence of physical features that convey a property's historic character. Because feeling and association depend on individual perceptions, their retention alone is never sufficient to support eligibility of a property for the National Register. The 1925 architecture was remodeled and enlarged in 1991, with more additions and remodeling culminating from 2007-2015. However, the construction from 1991-2015 does not create a significant design idiom and is not significant when there are many examples of Vernacular, mixed era architecture in Los Gatos. After the 1991- 2015 remodeling and the additions to the original house, there is a loss of integrity. Of the seven aspects of integrity, only the aspect of location is completely present. The design has changed, historic materials have been replaced, the original workmanship is lost to reconstruction and remodeling, the setting has changed from a natural wooded setting to formal landscaping in a residential neighborhood setting, the feeling of the smaller house has changed to one of a large rambling, eclectic, yet elegant house. With additional buildings and tailored landscaping, the feeling has changed dramatically. The aspect of association cannot be applied because no event or person of importance is associated with the property. Page 26 of 31 *Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder) 62 Ellenwood Ave., Los Gatos*Recorded by: Urban Programmers *Date 3/5/2019 X Continuation Update DPR 523L (Rev. 1/1995)(Word 9/2013) State of California  Natural Resources Agency Primary# DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI # Trinomial CONTINUATION SHEET Property Name: ____62 Ellenwood Ave., Los Gatos The house does not meet the criteria for significance or integrity, is not a significant historical resource, and is not eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources. Town of Los Gatos: The following Town of Los Gatos 2020 General Plan goals and policies relating to archaeological and historical resources are applicable to consider. Goal OSP-9 To protect Los Gatos’s archaeological and cultural resources to maintain and enhance a unique sense of place. Policy OSP-9.1 Evaluate archaeological and/or cultural resources early in the development review process through consultation with interested parties and the use of contemporary professional techniques in archaeology, ethnography, and architectural history. The property was researched and then evaluated for cultural and architectural importance. The evaluation is provided to the Town prior to a development proposal. Goal CD-12 To preserve significant historic and architectural features within the Town. The research and evaluation show that the buildings on the property are not significant features in Los Gatos. In the immediate area, several of the earlier houses have been reconstructed to larger buildings in different architectural styles. Division 3. Historic Preservation and LHP or Landmark and Historic Preservation Overlay Zone Sec. 29.80.215. Purposes. Page 27 of 31 *Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder) 62 Ellenwood Ave., Los Gatos*Recorded by: Urban Programmers *Date 3/5/2019 X Continuation Update DPR 523L (Rev. 1/1995)(Word 9/2013) State of California  Natural Resources Agency Primary# DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI # Trinomial CONTINUATION SHEET Property Name: ____62 Ellenwood Ave., Los Gatos It is hereby found that structures, sites, and areas of special character or special historical, architectural or aesthetic interest or value have been and continue to be unnecessarily destroyed or impaired, despite the feasibility of preserving them. It is further found that the public health, safety, and welfare require prevention of needless destruction and impairment, and promotion of the economic utilization and discouragement of the decay and desuetude of such structures, sites and areas. The purpose of historic preservation is to promote the health, safety, and general welfare of the public through: (1) The protection, enhancement, perpetuation, and use of structures, sites, and areas that are reminders of past eras, events, and persons important in local, State, or National history, or which provide significant examples of architectural styles of the past or are landmarks in the history of architecture, or which are unique and irreplaceable assets to the Town and its neighborhoods, or which provide for this and future generations examples of the physical surroundings in which past generations lived. (2) The development and maintenance of appropriate settings and environment for such structures. (3) The enhancement of property values, the stabilization of neighborhood and areas of the Town, the increase of economic and financial benefits to the Town and its inhabitants, and the promotion of tourist trade and interest. (4) The enrichment of human life in its educational and cultural dimensions by serving aesthetic as well as material needs and fostering knowledge of the living heritage of the past. The Town recognizes a historical resource as follows: any structure/site that is located within a historic district, any Page 28 of 31 *Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder) 62 Ellenwood Ave., Los Gatos*Recorded by: Urban Programmers *Date 3/5/2019 X Continuation Update DPR 523L (Rev. 1/1995)(Word 9/2013) State of California  Natural Resources Agency Primary# DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI # Trinomial CONTINUATION SHEET Property Name: ____62 Ellenwood Ave., Los Gatos structure/site that is historically designated, or any primary structure constructed prior to 1941 unless the Town has determined that the structure has no historic significance or architectural merit. Finding: The Town has designated the historic districts of Almond Grove, Broadway, Los Gatos Commercial, Fairview Plaza and University/Edelen. All the historic districts are located in the historic core area of Los Gatos. The subject property is not in a designated historic district. The house has been extensively remodeled and enlarged, and does not exhibit special character; or special historical, architectural, or aesthetic interest; or value to the built environment of Los Gatos. The garage building, landscaping, and ancillary building have been constructed since 2007 and are not contributing to the historic value of the altered house. California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) In the historical resource section of CEQA, the concern is directed toward any project that may create an adverse change to any historical resource. CEQA Guidelines Appendix G indicates that a project may have a significant effect on the environment if it would: 1. cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in section 15064.5; 2. cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to section 15064.5; 3. directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature; 4. disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries; or Page 29 of 31 *Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder) 62 Ellenwood Ave., Los Gatos*Recorded by: Urban Programmers *Date 3/5/2019 X Continuation Update DPR 523L (Rev. 1/1995)(Word 9/2013) State of California  Natural Resources Agency Primary# DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI # Trinomial CONTINUATION SHEET Property Name: ____62 Ellenwood Ave., Los Gatos 5. conflict with a plan or policy adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect. A “substantial adverse change” to a historical resource is defined in Guidelines Section 15064.5(b) as “physical demolition, destruction, relocation, or alteration of the resource or its immediate surroundings such that the significance of a historical resource would be materially impaired.” The significance of a historical resource is materially impaired when a project “demolishes or materially alters in an adverse manner those physical characteristics of a historical resource that convey its historical significance and that justify its inclusion in, or eligibility for inclusion in the California Register of Historical Resources;” or “demolishes or materially alters in an adverse manner those physical characteristics that account for its inclusion in a local register of historical resources...” or “demolishes or materially alters in an adverse manner those physical characteristics of a historical resource that convey its historical significance and that justify its eligibility for inclusion in the California Register of Historical Resources as determined by a lead agency for purposes of CEQA.” CEQA (Guidelines Section 15064.5), define the term “historical resources” to include the following: 1. A resource listed in, or determined to be eligible by the State Historical Resources Commission, for listing in the California Register (Public Resources Code §5024.1, Title 14 California Code of Regulations, Section 4850 et seq.). 2. A resource included in a local register of historical resources, as defined in Section 5020.1(k) of the Public Resources Code or identified as significant in a historical resource survey meeting the requirements of Section 5024.1(g) of the Public Resources Code, shall be presumed to be historically or culturally significant. Public Page 30 of 31 *Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder) 62 Ellenwood Ave., Los Gatos*Recorded by: Urban Programmers *Date 3/5/2019 X Continuation Update DPR 523L (Rev. 1/1995)(Word 9/2013) State of California  Natural Resources Agency Primary# DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI # Trinomial CONTINUATION SHEET Property Name: ____62 Ellenwood Ave., Los Gatos agencies must treat any such resource as significant unless the preponderance of evidence demonstrates that it is not historically or culturally significant. 3. Any object, building, structure, site, area, place, record, or manuscript which a lead agency determines to be historically significant or significant in the architectural, engineering, scientific, economic, agricultural, educational, social, political, military, or cultural annals of California, may be considered to be a historical resource, provided the lead agency’s determination is supported by substantial evidence in light of the whole record. Generally, a resource shall be considered by the lead agency to be “historically significant” if the resource meets the criteria for listing in the California Register (Public Resources Code Section 5024.1, Title 14 California Code of Regulations, Section 4852) CEQA Finding: The research and evaluation of the house and garage at 62 Ellenwood Avenue conclude that the property and buildings do not meet the criteria of the California Register of Historical Resources or the criteria of the Town of Los Gatos for designating a historical resource. For purposes of CEQA, the subject property is not a “Historical Resource” under the CEQA Guidelines. Sources Consulted: Building permits and deeds are listed in the footnotes. Bruntz, George G., History of Los Gatos-Gem of the Foothills, Valley Publishers, 1981 California Office of Historic Preservation, “CEQA and Historic Preservation” Page 31 of 31 *Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder) 62 Ellenwood Ave., Los Gatos*Recorded by: Urban Programmers *Date 3/5/2019 X Continuation Update DPR 523L (Rev. 1/1995)(Word 9/2013) State of California  Natural Resources Agency Primary# DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI # Trinomial CONTINUATION SHEET Property Name: ____62 Ellenwood Ave., Los Gatos Comstock, William T., Suburban and Country Homes, New York, 1893 Conaway-Bergtold, Peggy &Ross- Matthews, Stephanie, Legendary Locals of Los Gatos, Arcadia Publishing Company, 2014 Conaway, Peggy, Los Gatos (CA) (Images of America), Arcadia Publishing Company, 2004 Foley, Mary Mix, The American House, Harper Colophon Books, Harper & Row Publishers, New York, 1980 McAlester, V & L. A Field Guide to American Houses, A. Knopf, New York, 1985 Rifkind, C. A Field Guide to American Architecture, Times Mirror, New York 1980 Town of Los Gatos, 2020 General Plan. Town of Los Gatos, “How to Research You Los Gatos House”. Whiffin, Marcus, American Architecture Since 1780 A Guide to Styles, M.I.T.Press, Cambridge Mass. 1981 Wilson, Henry L., California Bungalows of the 1920s, Dover Publications, New York 1993 U.S. Department of the Interior, National Park Service, Cultural Resources, National Register, National Register Bulletin – How to Apply the National Register Criteria for Evaluation, Government Printing Office, 1997 This Page Intentionally Left Blank ATTACHMENT 5 This Page Intentionally Left Blank ATTACHMENT 6 This Page Intentionally Left Blank PREPARED BY: SEAN MULLIN, AICP Associate Planner Reviewed by: Planning Manager and Community Development Director 110 E. Main Street Los Gatos, CA 95030 ● 408-354-6874 www.losgatosca.gov TOWN OF LOS GATOS HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMITTEE MEETING DATE: 06/26/2019 ITEM NO: 2 ADDENDUM DATE: JUNE 25, 2019 TO: HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMITTEE FROM: JOEL PAULSON, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR SUBJECT: PROJECT LOCATION: 62 ELLENWOOD AVENUE. PROPERTY OWNER: LISA AND CASE SWENSON. APPLICANT: KURT SIMROCK. REQUESTING APPROVAL FOR REMOVAL OF A PRE-1941 PROPERTY FROM THE HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY ON PROPERTY ZONED R-1:12. APN 510-20-068. REMARKS: Attachment 7 includes information from the Anne Bloomfield Survey and 1928 Sanborn Map for the subject property submitted by the HPC Chair. The March 1991 Building Permit plans for an addition to the first floor and modifications to the first and second floors will be made available at the meeting as requested by the HPC Chair. Attachments previously distributed with the March 20, 2019 report include a Letter of Justification, DPR forms, 2007 Development Plans, and the Anne Bloomfield Survey. ATTACHMENTS: Previously received with the June 26, 2019 Report: 1. Updated Letter of Justification 2. Exhibits showing the modifications to the residence 3. Exhibit and photos of changes to residences within the neighborhood 4. Updated Department of Parks and Recreation form 5. Structural Conditions Report 6. Exterior Architectural Evaluation report Received with this Addendum Report: 7. Anne Bloomfield Report excerpts and 1928 Sanborn Map This Page Intentionally Left Blank ATTACHMENT 1 This Page Intentionally Left Blank