Loading...
Item 1 - HPCminutes 8-26-15DRAFTTOWN OF LOS GATOS 110 East Main Street, Los Gatos, CA 95030 (408) 354-6872 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY MINUTES OF MEETING OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMITTEE OF THE TOWN OF LOS GATOS FOR AUGUST 26, 2015, HELD IN THE TOWN COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 110 E MAIN STREET, LOS GATOS, CALIFORNIA. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The meeting was called to order at 4:00 P.M. by Chair Len Pacheco. ATTENDANCE Members Present: Len Pacheco, Bob Cowan, Kathryn Janoff, Michael Kane, Tom O’Donnell Members Absent: None Staff Present: Joel Paulson, Planning Manager; Jennifer Savage, Senior Planner VERBAL COMMUNICATIONS None. ITEM 1 APPROVAL OF MINUTES Kathryn Janoff requested changes to page 2 of the August 19, 2015 minutes. Len Pacheco requested changes to page 2 of the August 19, 2015 minutes. Bob Cowan moved to approve the minutes of July 22, 2015 and August 19, 2015 with the requested changes. The motion was seconded by Len Pacheco and approved unanimously. ITEM 2 15360 FRANCIS OAKS Jim and Kerri Dunlay (property owners) were present and requested that the Committee recommend a change in the process to determine the age of structures. Len Pacheco visited the site and found that the house was post-war ranch style, probably not built before 1941. Michael Kane asked about the 1900 default date. Tom O’Donnell commented that staff should be able to review credible evidence. Kathryn Janoff asked the property owners when the process began. Bob Cowan moved to remove the property from the Historic Resources Inventory based on evidence submitted by the property owners. The motion was seconded DRAFTHistoric Preservation Committee August 26, 2015 Page 2 of 4 by Len Pacheco and approved unanimously. Tom O’Donnell moved to recommend that staff look into and correct the age of structures based on clear and convincing evidence. The motion was seconded by Michael Kane and approved unanimously. Kathryn Janoff commented that, alternatively, staff could bring the property in question to the Committee immediately. The Committee agreed that evidence showing structures were built in 1941 and after should not come to the Committee for review. ITEM 3 311 W. MAIN STREET Gary Kohlsaat (architect), Nora Comee (property owner), Paul (contractor), and Lou (neighbor) were present. Bob Cowan commented that repair is acceptable justification for the request and that the Town Code allows exemptions for repair. Tom O’Donnell agrees. Michael Kane appreciates the applicant’s letter and that they are requesting the change before making the change in the field. Len Pacheco asked if the request is for only the front and commented that he agrees with the other comments that the subject request is repair. Kathryn Janoff commented that it is great to retain the integrity of the structure. Michael Kane moved to approve the request and made the findings and considerations, and found the request is consistent with Town Policy in that the request is a repair which is exempt from the historic demolition definition. The motion was seconded by Kathryn Janoff and approved unanimously. ITEM 4 OTHER BUSINESS a. 112 Los Gatos Boulevard Yana Kushner and John Gilred (buyers) were present. The buyers explained that they want to restore traditional Spanish mission mullions and grids on all windows, doors, and sliding doors. DRAFTHistoric Preservation Committee August 26, 2015 Page 3 of 4 Dave Zicovich (applicant) was present and provided existing floor plans. The Committee discussed the existing condition of the structure and whether the condition warrants approval for demolition. Bob Cowan commented that there is not enough information to support demolition. He commented that the condition report is vague and that the Building Official should inspect the structure. Kathryn Janoff asked about the research regarding the structure’s historic significance, architectural value, or persons of interest. She requested additional information that would allow the Committee to make the findings. Len Pacheco commented that the structure’s architecture was mixed and included Victorian style. He commented that he was concerned about mold infestation. Tom O’Donnell asked if the structure was beyond repair, what the Committee would recommend. Kathryn Janoff commented that if it is a significant structure, the Committee would support reconstruction and keep the structure on the Historic Resources Inventory. The Committee discussed options with the applicant and staff. The Committee considered whether the repair exemption could be used to maintain the appearance of the structure from the rear. Kathryn Janoff recommended not to remove from the structure from the Historic Resources Inventory, and that the applicant, the Committee and staff work together to allow the historic structure to be preserved. She asked if the Committee can waive certain requirements to meet historic preservation goals. The Committee asked staff to research options including but not limited to a Variance application and Town Code waiver, and to provide the information to the applicant and the Committee prior to the next Historic Preservation Committee meeting. b. Historic Demolition The Committee discussed the matter including: DRAFTHistoric Preservation Committee August 26, 2015 Page 4 of 4 • The requirement to maintain structure in good repair is unfair for historic buildings where there is no requirement for non-historic structures. What are the legal implications? • Do they keep or delete the existing Town Code regarding a property owner’s duty to keep in good repair. Committee consensus was to delete after checking with the attorney. • Whether demolition by neglect was currently in the Town Code? • The repair exemption from historic demolition. Does it allow for good construction practice and does it further historic preservation? • Consider adding language regarding modern construction practices. • Direct staff to review and comment on the draft proposed language changes. ITEM 5 ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned at 5:32 p.m. The next regular meeting is scheduled for September 23, 2015, at 4:00 p.m. Prepared by: Approved by: _______________________________ ________________________________ Jennifer L. Savage, AICP Len Pacheco Senior Planner Chair N:\DEV\HISTORIC PRESERVATION\HPCminutes\2015\HPCminutes 8-26-15.docx