Loading...
01-12-21 - HPC GPAC CommentsATTACHMENT 21 Comments from the Historic Preservation Committee At the January 12, 2021 special meeting of the Historic Preservation Committee, members discussed the Revised Initial Drafts of the Land Use and Community Design Elements and provided the following comments: Revised Initial Draft Land Use Element Key Terms Intensity There is a typo in the definition of intensity, where a period should replace a comma. (page 3-3) Multi-family Residential The definition should be revised to clarify that Accessory Dwelling Units are not included. (page 3-4) 3.8 Preserving Our History LU-16 Provide for the protection of Los Gatos’ cultural heritage through the protection and maintenance of historic resources. LU-16.1 Historic Districts and Landmarks Revise the first sentence to state that both maps and the Historic Resources Inventory list will be maintained on the website. Everything after the first sentience in this Policy is a general description and should be moved to the introductory description of historic districts at the top of page 3-33. (page 3-35) 3.14 Implementation Programs The language in Implementation Program F is appropriate. An Implementation Program should also be added, reiterating comments provided by the HPC on the Initial Draft of the Environment and Sustainability Element, to state the following: “Consider conducting an updated Historic Resource Inventory (HRI) survey, reviewing Historic District and neighborhood boundaries, and reconsidering the construction date for presumptive historic resources,” under Goals LU-13 and LU-16. (page 3-42) General comments were made that there are many small neighborhoods that may have some level of historic significance, where individual properties may not have historic significance. When properties are found by the HPC not to have historic significance, the HPC may have comments regarding certain historic elements that could be considered in the review of the new design by the decision makers. A process to forward those comments could be considered. Revised Initial Draft Community Design Element 4.2 Community Form CD-2 Encourage all development in Town to be designed holistically, complementing the existing urban fabric, and incorporating sustainable design principles. CD-2.24 Outdoor Dining This Policy may appear to conflict with the current program for semi-permanent parklets in the public right-of-way. (page 4-14) CD-3 Preserve significant historic and architectural features within the Town. Encourage all development in Town to be designed holistically, complementing the existing urban fabric, and incorporating sustainable design principles. CD-3.1 Avoid Demolition of Historic Buildings The policy should be revised to replace “substantial evidence” with “required findings.” (page 4-24) CD-3.2 Reuse of Existing Buildings Consider moving this Policy under Goal CD-4 to support and encourage thoughtful rehabilitation or reuse of historic structures. (page 4-24) CD-3.3 Historic Structure Preservation Include noncontributors in the list of buildings that the Town will use special care in reviewing. (page 4-24) CD-3.4 Historic Preservation Programs Revise the Policy to state the following: Continue the Town’s careful and proactive historic preservation programs “recognizing the changing needs of the community.” (page 4-24) CD-3.7 Potential Impacts to Historic Landmarks and Features Replace the term “consider” with the term “identify” and consider combining this Policy with Policy CD-3.8 Historic Site Impact Mitigation. (page 4-25) CD-3.9 Historic Structure Use or Donation Consider moving this Policy under Goal CD-4 Support and encourage thoughtful rehabilitation or reuse of historic structures. (page 4-25) CD-4 Support and encourage thoughtful rehabilitation or reuse of historic structures. CD-4.2 Historic Structure Renovations Revise the Policy to state the following: Require “exterior” renovations or remodels of historic structures to be architecturally “compatible” with the original structure. (page 4-25) CD-4.4 Financial Benefit Information Revise the Policy to remove the phrase “and the vibrant historic downtown” because vibrancy is not a financial benefit. (page 4-25) CD-8 Preserve the character of Downtown Los Gatos and the quality of life for its citizens through high-quality building design. CD-8.6 Historic Architectural “Downtown” Core Include “Downtown” in the title and revise the Policy language to state the following: Reinforce the historic architectural “downtown” core of Los Gatos by “encouraging compatible” architecture Downtown. (page 4-33)