Loading...
11-17-15 Minutes - DRCTOWN OF LOS GATOS 110 East Main Street, Los Gatos, CA 95030 (408) 354-6874 SUMMARY MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE OF THE TOWN OF LOS GATOS FOR NOVEMBER 17, 2015 HELD IN THE TOWN COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CIVIC CENTER, 110 EAST MAIN STREET, LOS GATOS , CALIFORNIA. The meeting was called to order at 10:04 a.m. by Chair Machado. ATTENDANCE Members Present: Marni Moseley, Associate Planner Doug Harding, Fire Department Michael Machado, Building Official Mike Weisz, Associate Civil Engineer Ryan Do, Assistant Civil Engineer PUBLIC HEARINGS ITEM 1: 45 Broadway Architecture and Site Application S-15-040 Requesting approval for relocating a contributing single-family residence in the Broadway Historic District, constructing a second story addition greater than 100 square feet, and an accessory structure with reduced setbacks on property zoned R-1D:LHP. APN 510-45-057. PROPERTY OWNER: Lori Baker APPLICANT: Jay Plett PROJECT PLANNER: Susie Pineda I. Chair Machado opened the public hearing. 2. Staff gave report on proposed project. 3. Applicant was introduced. 4. Members of the public were not present. 5. Public hearing closed. 6. Mike Weisz moved to approve the application subject to the conditions presented with the following findings and considerations: FINDINGS Required finding for CEQA: • The project is Categorically Exempt pursuant to the adopted Guidelines for the Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act, Section 15303: New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures. DRC Minutes November 17, 2015 Page 2 Required Compliance with the Residential Design Guidelines: • The project complies with the Residential Design Guidelines for single-family homes not in hillside residential areas. CONSIDERATIONS Required considerations in review of Architecture & Site applications: • As required by Section 29.20.150 of the Town Code, the considerations in review of an Architecture and Site application were all made in reviewing this project. 7 . Doug Harding seconded, motion passed unanimously. 8. Appeal rights were cited. ITEM 2 : 17528 Tourney Road Architecture and Site Application S-14-127 Requesting approval to demolish an existing single-family residence and to construct a new single-family residence on property zoned HR-2'l1. APN 537-04-019. PROPERTY OWNER: Joe Thornton APPLICANT: Bess Wiersema PROJECT PLANNER : Marni Moseley 1. Chair Machado opened the public hearing. 2. Staff gave report on proposed project. 3 . Applicant was introduced. 4. Members of the public were present. • Roger Hayashi , 200 Tourney Loop • Jeff Weinstein, 17500 Tourney Road • Steve and Beverly Miller, 17651 Tourney Road 5. Public hearing closed. 6. Marni Moseley moved to approve the application subject to additional conditions of approval with the following findings and considerations: FINDINGS Required finding for CEQA: • The project is Categorically Exempt pursuant to the adopted Guidelines for the Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act, Section 15303 : New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures. DRC Minute s November 17,2015 Page 3 Required findings for demolition: • As required by Section 29.1 0.09030(e) of the Town Code for the demolition of a single family residence: 1. 2. 3. The Town's housing stock will be maintained as the house will be replaced. The structure has no historic significance. The property owner does not desire to maintain the structure due to its current condition and site constraints; and 4 . The economic utility of the structure is limited. Required Compliance with the Hillside Development Standards and Guidelines: • The project is in compliance with the Hillside Development Standards and Guidelines. Compliance with Hillside Specific Plan: The project is in compliance with the Hillside Specific Plan in that the site is developed as a single family residence on an existing parcel. The proposal is consistent with the development criteria included in the plan. CONSIDERATIONS Required considerations in review of applications: • As required by Section 29.20.150 of the Town Code, the considerations in review of an architecture and site application were all made in reviewing this project. 7 . Mike Weisz seconded, motion passed unanimously. 8. Appeal rights were cited. OTHER BUSINESS NONE ADJOURNMENT Meeting adjourned at 11: I 0 a.m. The next regularly scheduled meeting of the Development Review Committee is the following Tuesday. "-Tv\~ J~4~r- Michael Machado, Building Official N:\DEV\DRC\Min 2015\ll-17-15.doc