The URL can be used to link to this page

Attachment 6 - Apr. 26, 2017 Planning Commission Staff Report and Exhibits 21-28TOWN OF LOS GATOS PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT MEETING DATE: 04/26/2017 ITEM NO: 2 DATE: APRIL 21, 2017 TO: PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: JOEL PAULSON, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR SUBJECT: ARCHITECTURE AND SITE APPLICATION S-16-023, SUBDIVISION APPLICATION M-16-002. AND NEGATIVE DECLARATION ND-16-003. PROJECT LOCATION: 15860-15894 WINCHESTER BOULEVARD. APPLICANT: DOUG RICH. VALLEY OAK PARTNERS. PROPERTY OWNER: SOUTH BEACH PARTNERS LLC AND CUMULUS CAPITAL HOLIDINGS LLC. REQUESTING APPROVAL TO DEMOLISH THREE EXISTING SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCES, REMOVE A SECOND UNIT, REMOVE LARGE PROTECTED TREES, AND MERGE FOUR LOTS FOR THE PURPOSES OF CONSTRUCTING A NEW TWO-STORY OFFICE BUILDING WITH BELOW GRADE AND AT GRADE PARKING. APNS 529-11-013, -038, -039, AND -040. DEEMED COMPLETE: JANUARY 5, 2017 FINAL DATE TO TAKE ACTION: JULY 5, 2017 REMARKS: The Planning Commission considered the applications on January 25, 2017. The applications were continued to March 22, 2017 with specific direction including those topics listed below. On March 22, 2017 the project was continued to April 26, 2017 to allow the applicant additional time for revisions and outreach with the neighbors. On March 14, 2017 the applicant submitted revised development plans (Exhibit 28) and a letter addressing how the revised project meets the direction provided by the Commission (Exhibit 23). On April 7, 2017 the applicant submitted an addendum to the letter with a visual summary of the changes made to the project (Exhibit 24). PREPARED BY: JOCELYN PUGA Associate Planner Reviewed by: Planning Manager and Community Development Director 110 E. Main Street Los Gatos, CA 95030 • 408-354-6874 www.Iosgatosca.gov ATTACHMENT 6 PAGE 2 OF 6 SUBJECT: 15860-15894 WINCHESTER BOULEVARD/S-16-023, M-16-002, and ND-16-003 APRIL 21, 2017 A. Architecture The Planning Commission gave direction to the applicant to consider making the following modifications to the design of the building: • Modify the color of the exterior plaster and incorporate the use of more natural materials like stone or wood; • Reduce the height of architectural elements that add to the mass of the building; and • Address features that increase the perceived height of the building. The applicant made the following modifications explained in the summary of changes document and addendum, dated March 14, 2017 and April 7, 2017 (Exhibits 23 and 24). The amount of exterior plaster that was previously proposed was reduced along all of the elevations, in addition to modifying the color to more of an earth tone. Additional wood siding was added to the elevations to strengthen the residential feel of the building. The previous proposal included two tower features along the front elevation. The applicant has eliminated one tower with one remaining towards the southern property line that is required for a stairwell and roof access. The applicant modified the southern elevation to step down to a single -story element with a maximum height of 20 feet. Lastly, the applicant modified the roof style along the northern portion of the building from a front -to -back gable roof with a peak ridgeline to a shed roof. The maximum height of the building is still proposed at 35 feet through the center ridgeline of the building; however, the wall plane heights at the southern and northern elevations were reduced between four feet and 10 feet due to the modification from a front -to -back gable roof to a shed roof (Exhibit 28, Sheet A2.0). B. Site Design The Planning Commission gave direction to the applicant to consider making the following modifications to the siting of the building on the property: • Set the building back an additional 10 feet towards the rear of the property; • Add a solid wall fence along the southern property line adjacent to the residential use; and • Relocate the exhaust fan. As explained in the summary of changes and addendum (Exhibits 23 and 24), the applicant set the building back towards the rear of the property an additional six feet, resulting in a proposed front setback of 35 feet, nine inches; where 25 feet is required by Town Code. Pushing the building back 10 feet would result in the elimination of the existing trees along the eastern property line and would create drainage and water treatment challenges. In addition, the decorative metal panel along the perimeter edge of the surface parking tot N:\DEV\PC REPORTS \2017\Winchester15860-15844 04.26.17.docx 4/21/2017 10:21 AM PAGE 3 OF 6 SUBJECT: 15860-15894 WINCHESTER BOULEVARD/S-16-023, M-16-002, and ND-16-003 APRIL 21, 2017 was replaced with a 42-inch tall masonry wall to address the adjacent neighbor's concerns regarding the reflections of vehicle headlights and to provide an additional level of protection against vehicles. Lastly, the exhaust fan was relocated from the southern property line and is now proposed to be vented vertically through the roof of the building. C. Landscaping The Planning Commission gave direction to the applicant to address the following landscape concerns: • Clarify the discrepancy with the plan set and the Consulting Arborist's report; and • Retain more trees. The applicant modified Sheet L-2 of Exhibit 28 to address previous discrepancies of tree numbering with the Consulting Arborist's report previously included as Exhibit 7. In order to set the building back an additional six feet to the rear of the property, tree #25, a 17-inch Coast Live Oak tree and tree #40, a 16-inch Valley Oak tree are now proposed to be removed. However, tree #8, a six-inch Coast Live Oak tree that is located along the front elevation is now proposed to be retained. The applicant is also proposing the addition of three new 24-inch box trees along the front elevation to help screen the building from Winchester Boulevard (Exhibit 23). D. Traffic Planning Commissioners expressed concerns with vehicles exiting left out of the surface parking lot onto Winchester Boulevard, and asked whether a crosswalk or traffic signal should be installed at Winchester Boulevard and Shelburne Way. The applicant's traffic consultant, Hexagon Transportation Consultants, Inc. submitted a memorandum in response to the above concerns of the Commission (Exhibit 26). The traffic consultant stated that prohibiting left turns from the surface parking lot onto Winchester Boulevard is not recommended because the diverted traffic would impact the surrounding residential streets, including Via Sereno and Bruce Avenue. Hexagon stated that vehicles unable to turn left onto Winchester Boulevard would exit north on Winchester Boulevard and immediately turn left onto Via Serena to complete a three-point turn or legal u-turn in order to travel south on Winchester Boulevard (Exhibit 26). Similarly, vehicles traveling north along Winchester Boulevard that are unable to turn left into the surface parking lot may use Bruce Avenue to complete a three-point turn or legal u-turn in order to be able to turn right into the surface parking lot. According to the traffic consultant, "such maneuvers would unnecessarily add traffic impacts to Via Sereno and Bruce Avenue." NI: `DEV\PC REPORTS \2017\Winchester158C0-15894 04.26.17.docx 4/21/2017 11:02 AM PAGE4OF6 SUBJECT: 15860-15894 WINCHESTER BOULEVARD/S-16-023, M-16-002, and ND-16-003 APRIL 21, 2017 Hexagon does not recommend the installation of a crosswalk or signal at the intersection of Shelburne Way and Winchester Boulevard as it is not warranted by the traffic volume, delay, pedestrian volume, and accident history. In addition, a traffic signal with crosswalks is located one block away at Dawes Avenue (Exhibit 26). Parks and Public Works staff and the Town's traffic consultant, TJKM have reviewed the letter prepared by Hexagon and agree with the findings of the letter. Parks and Public Works staff and TJKM will be available at the Planning Commission meeting to answer additional questions the Commission may have. E. Neighborhood Outreach The Planning Commission gave direction to the applicant to continue outreach meetings with the neighbors. In response to the Commission's direction, the applicant met with the neighbors twice to discuss changes to the project on February 16, 2017 and March 2, 2017. The meeting attendees for the February 16, 2017 meeting are included as Exhibit 25 and additional correspondence that occurred after the neighborhood outreach meetings are included as Exhibit 27. F. Conditions of Approval Due to the modifications to the project, Building and Engineering conditions of approval have been modified to reflect the revised project. Revised conditions of approval are included in Exhibit 22 with the modifications provided in bold font and the deletions shown in strikcthroug44 font. PUBLIC COMMENTS: Public comments and neighborhood correspondence attached as Exhibit 27. CONCLUSION: A. Recommendation Should the Planning Commission determine that the project revisions meet the direction provided at the January 25, 2017 meeting, the Commission can make the findings (Exhibit 21) to approve the Architecture and Site application and Subdivision application as outlined in the January 25, 2017 staff report with revised conditions of approval attached as Exhibit 22. 1. Adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (Exhibit 1 and 13); N:1DEV\PC REPORTS\ 20171Winchester15860-15894 04.26.17.docx 4/21/2017 11:02 AM PAGE 5 OF 6 SUBJECT: 15860-15894 WINCHESTER BOULEVARD/S-16-023, M-16-002, and ND-16-003 APRIL 21, 2017 2. Make the required finding that the project complies with the Commercial Design Guidelines (Exhibit 21); 3. Make the required finding as required by Section 29.10.330 of the Town Code for granting approval of the elimination of a secondary dwelling unit without replacement (Exhibit 21); 4. Make the required findings as required by Section 29.10.09030(e) of the Town Code for granting approval of the demolition of existing structures (Exhibit 21); 5. Make the required findings as required by Section 66474 of the Subdivision Map Act (Exhibit 21); and 6. Make the required considerations as required by Section 29.20.150 of the Town Code for granting approval of an Architecture & Site application (Exhibit 21); and 7. Approve Architecture & Site Application S-16-023 and Subdivision Application M-16-003 with the conditions contained in Exhibit 22 and the development plans in Exhibit 28. B. Alternatives Alternatively, the Commission can: 1. Continue the matter to a date certain with specific direction; or 2. Approve the applications with additional and/or modified conditions; or 3. Deny the applications. EXHIBITS: Previously received under separate cover: 1. Mitigated Negative Declaration Previously received with January 25, 2017 Staff Report: 2. Location Map 3. Required Findings and Considerations (two pages) 4. Recommended Conditions of Approval (21 pages) 5. Letter ofJustification/Project Description, received March 3, 2016 (three pages) 6. Neighborhood Meeting Outcome and Attendees, received September 13, 2016 (two pages) 7. Consulting Arborist's First Report, dated February 12, 2016 (46 pages) 8. Consulting Arborist's Second Report, dated June 10, 2016 (seven pages) 9. Consulting Arborist's Addendum, dated July 22, 2016 (two pages) 10. Consulting Architect's Report, received May 5, 2016 (three pages) 11. January 13, 2016 Conceptual Development Advisory Committee Meeting Minutes 12. Public Comments and Responses Regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration 13. Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, dated January 5, 2017 14. Public Comment 15. Development Plans, received January 5, 2017 (29 pages) N:\DEV\PC REPORTS\2017\Winchester15860-15894 04.26.17.docx 4/21/2017 10:21 AM PAGE 6 OF 6 SUBJECT: 15860-15894 WINCHESTER BOULEVARD/S-16-023, M-16-002, and ND-16-003 APRIL 21, 2017 Previously received with January 25, 2017 Addendum Report: 16. Public comments received between 11:01 a.m., Friday, January 20, 2017 and 11:00 a.m., Tuesday, January 24, 2017 17. Additional information provided by the application, received January 24, 2017 (two pages) 18. Project information sheet provided by the Parks and Public Works Department, received January 24, 2015 (four pages) Previously received with January 25, 2017 Desk Item Report: 19. Public comments received between 11:01 a.m. Tuesday, January 24, 2017 and 11:00 a.m. Wednesday, January 25, 2017 (four pages) Previously received with March 22, 2017 Staff Report: 20. Communication from the applicant, received February 21, 2017 (misidentified as Exhibit 16 in the March 22, 2017 Staff Report) Received with this Staff Report: 21. Revised Required Findings and Considerations 22. Revised Conditions of Approval (21 pages) 23. Project Submittal Summary of Changes, received March 14, 2017 (two pages) 24. Project Submittal Summary of Changes — Addendum, received April 7, 2017 (12 pages) 25. February 16, 2017 Neighborhood Meeting Attendees, received February 17, 2017 (two pages) 26. Applicant's Traffic Consultant Letter, received March 31, 2017 (three pages) 27. Public Comment received between 11:01 a.m., Wednesday, January 25, 2017 and 11:00 a.m., Friday, April 21, 2017 28. Revised Development Plans, received March 14, 2017 (28 sheets) Distribution: Doug Rich, Valley Oak Partners, 734 The Alameda, San Jose, CA 95126 South Beach Partners LLC and Cumulus Capital Holdings LLC, 125 South Market Street, Suite 1250, San Jose, CA 95113 N:\DEV\PC REPORTS\2017\W inchester15860-15894 04.26.17.docx 4/21/2017 10:21 AM PLANNING COMMISSION - April 26, 2017 REQUIRED FINDINGS AND CONSIDERATIONS: 15860-15894 Winchester Boulevard Architecture and Site Application S-16-023 Subdivision Application M-16-002 Mitigated Negative Declaration ND-16-003 Requesting approval to demolish three existing single-family residences, remove a second unit, remove large protected trees, and merge four Iots for the purposes of constructing a new two-story office building with below grade and at grade parking. APNs 529-11-013, -038, -039, and -040. APPLICANT: Doug Rich, Valley Oak Partners PROPERTY OWNER: South Beach Partners LLC and Cumulus Capital Holdings LLC FINDINGS: Required Finding for CEQA: • It has been determined that this project will not have a significant impact on the environment. Adoption of a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program to mitigate potential impacts to a less than significant level is recommended. Commercial Design Guidelines: • The proposed building is consistent with applicable provisions of the Commercial Design Guidelines. Required finding for the elimination of a secondary dwelling unit without replacement: • As required by Section 29.10.330 of the Town Code for the elimination of a secondary dwelling unit, without replacement, the deciding body shall make the finding that the proposed elimination (without replacement) is consistent with the Town's Housing Element of the General Plan. In order to eliminate an existing second unit (whether or not it will be replaced), the deciding body must make the demolition findings pursuant to Section 29.10.09030 and made below. Required finding for the demolition of an existing structure and/or second unit: ■ As required by Section 29.10.09030(e) of the Town Code for the demolition of existing structures:: 1. The Town's housing stock will be reduced by four units however; the proposed office use will be consistent with the zoning designation of Office and the General Plan land use designation of Office Professional. 2. The existing structures have no architectural or historical significance. 1EMMET 2 1 3. The property owner does not desire to maintain the structures as they exist. 4. The economic utility of the structures was considered and replacement of the units would result in a non -conforming use. Required findings to deny a Subdivision application: • As required by Section 66474 of the State Subdivision Map Act the map shall be denied if any of the following findings are made: None of the findings could be made to deny the application. Instead, the Planning Commission makes the following affirmative findings: a. That the proposed map is consistent with all elements of the General Plan. b. That the design and improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with all elements of the General Plan. c. That the site is physically suitable for the type of development. d. That the site is physically suitable for the proposed density of development e. That the design of the subdivision and the proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage nor substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat f. That the design of the subdivision and type of improvements is not likely to cause serious public health problems. g. That the design of the subdivision and the type of improvements will not conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of, property within the proposed subdivision. CONSIDERATIONS Required considerations in review of Architecture & Site applications: • As required by Section 29.20.150 of the Town Code, the considerations in review of an Architecture and Site application were all made in reviewing this project. N:1DEV\FINDINGs\2017\W inchester1ss60-15894DOCX PLANNING COMMISSION - April 26, 2017 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 15860-15894 Winchester Boulevard Architecture and Site Application S-16-023 Subdivision Application M-16-002 Mitigated Negative Declaration ND-16-003 Requesting approval to demolish three existing single-family residences, remove a second unit, remove large protected trees, and merge four lots for the purposes of constructing a new two-story office building with below grade and at grade parking. APNs 529-11-013, -038, -039, and -040. APPLICANT: Doug Rich, Valley Oak Partners PROPERTY OWNER: South Beach Partners LLC and Cumulus Capital Holdings LLC TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT: Planning Division 1. APPROVAL: This application shall be completed in accordance with all of the conditions of approval listed below and in substantial compliance with the plans approved and noted as received by the Town on January 5, 2017. Any changes or modifications to the approved plans shall be approved by the Community Development Director, the Development Review Committee, the Planning Commission, or Town Council, depending on the scope of the changes. 2. EXPIRATION: The approval will expire two years from the approval date pursuant to Section 29.20.320 of the Town Code, unless the approval has been vested. 3. OUTDOOR LIGHTING: Exterior lighting shall be kept to a minimum, and shall be down directed fixtures that will not reflect or encroach onto adjacent properties. No flood lights shall be used unless it can be demonstrated that they are needed for safety or security. The lighting plan shall be reviewed during building plan check. 4. GENERAL: All existing trees shown on the plan and trees required to remain or to be planted are specific subjects of approval of this plan, and must remain on the site. 5. TREE REMOVAL PERMIT: A Tree Removal Permit shall be obtained for any trees to be removed, prior to the issuance of a building or grading permit. 6. ARBORIST REQUIREMENTS: The developer shall implement, at their cost, all recommendations made by Deborah Ellis, MS, identified in the Arborist reports, dated as received February 12, 2016, June 10, 2016, and July 22, 2016, respectively, on file in the Community Development Department. A Compliance Memorandum shall be prepared by the applicant and submitted with the building permit application detailing how the recommendations have or will be addressed. These recommendations must be incorporated in the building permit plans, and completed prior to issuance of a building permit where applicable. 7. TREE FENCING: Protective tree fencing shall be placed at the drip line of existing trees and shall remain through all phases of construction. Fencing shall be six foot high cyclone attached to two-inch diameter steel posts drive 18 inches into the ground and spaced no EXBIBIT 2 2 further than 10 feet apart. Include a tree protection fencing plan with the construction plans. 8. REPLACEMENT TREES: New trees shall be planted to mitigate the loss of trees being removed. The number of trees and size of replacement trees shall be determined using the canopy replacement table in the Town Code. Town Code requires a minimum 24-inch box size replacement tree. New trees shall be double staked with rubber ties and shall be planted prior to final inspection and issuance of occupancy permits. 9. WATER EFFICIENCY LANDSCAPE ORDINANCE: The final landscape plan, including landscape and irrigation plans and calculations, shall meet the Town of Los Gatos Water Conservation Ordinance or the State Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance, whichever is more restrictive. The final landscape plan shall be reviewed by the Town's consultant prior to issuance of building permits. A review fee based on the current fee schedule adopted by the Town Council is required when working landscape and irrigation plans are submitted for review. 10. SALVAGE OF BUILDING MATERIALS: Prior to the issuance of a demolition permit, the developer shall provide the Community Development Director with written notice of the company that will be recycling the building materials. All wood, metal, glass, and aluminum materials generated from the demolished structure shall be deposited to a company which will recycle the materials. Receipts from the company(s) accepting these materials, noting the type and weight of materials, shall be submitted to the Town prior to the Town's demolition inspection. 11. STORY POLES: The story poles on the project site shall be removed within 30 days of approval of the Architecture & Site application. 12. TOWN INDEMNITY: Applicants are notified that Town Code Section 1.10.115 requires that any applicant who receives a permit or entitlement from the Town shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the Town and its officials in any action brought by a third party to overturn, set aside, or void the permit or entitlement. This requirement is a condition of approval of all such permits and entitlements whether or not expressly set forth in the approval, and may be secured to the satisfaction of the Town Attorney. 13. AIR QUALITY MITIGATION MEASURE AIR-1*: BAAQMD-Recommend Basic Construction Mitigation Measures. To limit the project's construction -related dust and criteria pollutant emissions, the following the Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD)-recommended Basic Construction Mitigation Measures shall be included in the project's grading plan, building plans, and contract specifications: a. All exposed surfaces (e.g., parking areas, staging areas, soil piles, graded areas, and unpaved access roads) shall be watered two times per day, or otherwise kept dust - free. b. All haul trucks designated for removal of excavated soil and demolition debris from site shall be staged off -site until materials are ready for immediate loading and removal from site. c. All haul trucks transporting soil, sand, debris, or other loose material off -site shall be covered. d. As practicable, all haul trucks and other large construction equipment shall be staged in areas away from the adjacent residential homes. e. All visible mud or dirt track -out onto adjacent public roads shall be removed using wet power vacuum street sweepers at least once per day. The use of dry power sweeping is prohibited. An on -site track -out control device is also recommended to minimize mud and dirt -track -out onto adjacent public roads. f. All vehicle speeds on unpaved surfaces shall be limited to 15 mph. g. All driveways and sidewalks to be paved shall be completed as soon as possible. Building pads shall be laid as soon as possible after grading unless seeding or soil binders are used. h. Idling times shall be minimized either by shutting equipment off when not in use or reducing the maximum idling time to 2 minutes. Clear signage shall be provided for construction workers at all access points. i. All construction equipment shall be maintained and properly tuned in accordance with manufacturer's specifications. All equipment shall be checked by a certified visible emissions evaluator. All non -road diesel construction equipment shall at a minimum meet Tier 3 emission standards listed in the Code of Federal Regulations Title 40, Part 89, Subpart B, §89.112. j. Developer shall designate an on -site field supervisor to provide written notification of construction schedule to adjacent residential property owners and tenants at least one week prior to commencement of demolition and one week prior to commencement of grading with a request that all windows remain closed during demolition, site grading, excavation, and building construction activities in order to minimize exposure to NOx and PM10. The on -site field supervisor shall monitor construction emission levels within five feet of the property line of the adjacent residences for NOx and PM10 using the appropriate air quality and/or particulate monitor. k. Post a publicly visible sign with the telephone number and person to contact at the lead agency regarding dust complaints. This person shall respond and take corrective action within 48 hours. The Air District's phone number shall also be visible to ensure compliance with applicable regulations. I. All excavation, grading, and/or demolition activities shall be suspended when average wind speeds exceed 20 mph. m. Vegetative ground cover (e.g., fast -germinating native grass seed) shall be planted in disturbed areas as soon as possible and watered appropriately until vegetation is established. 14. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES MITIGATION MEASURE B1O-1*: Special -status and Migratory Bird Species. The following avoidance measures shall be required to avoid the project's potential effects on special -status and migratory bird species. a. If noise generation, ground disturbance, vegetation removal, or other construction activities begin during the nesting bird season (February 1 to August 31), or if construction activities are suspended for at least two weeks and recommence during the nesting bird season, then the project developer shall retain a qualified biologist to conduct a pre -construction survey for nesting birds. The survey shall be performed within suitable nesting areas on and adjacent to the site to ensure that no active nests would be disturbed during project implementation. This survey shall be conducted no more than two weeks prior to the initiation of construction activities. A report documenting survey results and plan for active bird nest avoidance (if needed) shall be completed by the qualified biologist and submitted to the Town of Los Gatos for approval prior to initiation of construction activities. If no active bird nests are detected during the survey, then construction activities can proceed as scheduled. However, if an active bird nest of a native species is detected during the survey, then a plan for active bird nest avoidance shall be prepared to determine and clearly delineate a temporary protective buffer area around each active nest, with buffer area size depending on the nesting bird species, existing site conditions, and type of proposed construction activities. The protective buffer area around an active bird nest is typically 75-250 feet, determined at the discretion of the qualified biologist and in compliance with any applicable project permits. To ensure that no inadvertent impacts to an active bird nest will occur, no construction activities shall occur within the protective buffer area(s) until the juvenile birds have fledged (left the nest), and there is no evidence of a second attempt at nesting, as determined by the qualified biologist. 15. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES MITIGATION MEASURE BIO-2: The applicant shall comply with the Town of Los Gatos Tree Protection Ordinance and a tree removal permit shall be obtained from the Town for the removal of any on -site trees that qualify as a protected tree. No new trees planted on site shall have a trunk diameter of less than 1.5 inches. Protective construction fencing shall be in place for all retained trees prior to the commencement of any site work. Any trenching within the dripline of existing trees shall be hand dug. 16. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES MITIGATION MEASURE BIO-3: The applicant shall comply with the recommendations in the arborist report prepared for the proposed project by Deborah Ellis on February 12, 2016, June 10, 2016, and July 22, 2016. 17. GEOLOGY AND SOILS MITIGATION MEASURE GEO-1: The applicant shall include the recommendations of the 2015 geotechnical report on all bid and construction documents to ensure that the recommended standards for development of foundations, subsurface improvements, etc. are incorporated into the project design and construction. All foundation and grading plans shall be reviewed by a licensed engineer and approved by the Town's engineer. 18. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS MITIGATION MEASURE GHG-1: The applicant shall include at least one reserved van -pool parking space; at least two reserved car-pool parking spaces, and at least four electric charging stations (one of which should be available to a handicapped space). 19. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS MITIGATION MEASURE GHG-2: The applicant shall include solar energy or other alternative energy sources on project plans, providing 15 percent or more of the project's energy needs. Plans shall incorporate any combination of the following strategies to reduce heat gain for 50 percent of the non -roof impervious site landscape, which includes roads, sidewalks, courtyards, parking lots, and driveways: shaded within five years of occupancy; paving materials with a Solar Reflectance Index (SRI) of at least 29; open grid pavement system; and parking spaces underground, under deck, under roof, or under a building. Any roof used to shade or cover parking must have an SRI of at least 29 and/or have solar panels. 20. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS EMISSIONS MITIGATION MEASURE HZ-1: Prior to the issuance of a demolition permit, the project applicant shall conduct sampling and testing of the existing building to determine the extent and presence of asbestos -containing building materials on the site. If measured levels exceed established thresholds, a work plan shall be developed and implemented to remove and dispose of the lead -containing materials in accordance with the established regulations. 21. COMPLIANCE MEMORANDUM: A memorandum shall be prepared and submitted with the building plans detailing how the Conditions of Approval will be addressed. Building Division 22. PERMITS REQUIRED: A separate Building Permit will be required for the subterranean parking garage podium structure and a separate Building Permit shall be required for the two-story office building. The trash enclosure shall also be on a separate permit. These are combination permits including electrical, mechanical, and plumbing work as necessary. 23. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: The Conditions of Approval must be blue -lined in full on the second sheet of the construction plans. A Compliance Memorandum shall be prepared and submitted with the building permit application detailing how the Conditions of Approval will be addressed. 24. SIZE OF PLANS: Four sets of construction plans, size 24" x 36" minimum, 30" x 42" maximum. 25. BUILDING ADDRESS: Submit requests for any building address changes or deletions to the Building Division prior to submitting for the building permit application process. 26. SOILS REPORT: A soils report, prepared to the satisfaction of the Building Official, containing foundation and retaining wall design recommendations, shall be submitted with the building permit application. This report shall be prepared by a licensed civil engineer specializing in soils mechanics. 27. DEMOLITION REQUIREMENTS: Obtain Building Department Demolition Applications and Bay Area Air Quality Management District Applications from the Building Department Service Counter. Once the Demolition Forms have been completed, all signatures obtained, and written verification from PG&E that all utilities have been disconnected, return the completed Forms to the Building Department Service Counter with the Air District's J# Certificate(s), PG&E verification, and three (3) sets of Site Plans showing all existing structures, existing utility service lines such as water, sewer, and PG&E. No demolition work shall be done without first obtaining a Permit from the Town. 28. SHORING: Shoring plans and calculations will be required for all excavations which exceed four (4) feet in depth or which remove lateral support from any existing building, adjacent property or the public right-of-way. Shoring plans and calculations shall be prepared by a California licensed engineer and shall conform to Cal/OSHA regulations. 29. FOUNDATION INSPECTIONS: A pad certificate prepared by a licensed civil engineer or land surveyor shall be submitted to the project building inspector at foundation inspection. This certificate shall certify compliance with the recommendations as specified in the soils report and that the building pad elevations and on -site retaining wall locations and elevations have been prepared according to the approved plans. Horizontal and vertical controls shall be set and certified by a licensed surveyor or registered civil engineer for the following items: a. Building pad elevation b. Finish floor elevation c. Foundation corner locations d. Retaining Walls 30. TITLE 24 ENERGY COMPLIANCE: All required California Title 24 Energy Compliance Forms must be blue -lined (sticky -backed) onto a sheet of the plans. 31. BACKWATER VALVE: The scope of this project may require the installation of a sanitary sewer backwater valve per Town Ordinance 6.50.025. Please provide information on the plans if a backwater valve is required and the location of the installation. The Town of Los Gatos Ordinance and West Valley Sanitation District (WVSD) requires backwater valves on drainage piping serving fixtures that have flood level rims less than 12-inches above the elevation of the next upstream manhole. 32. FIRE ZONE: This project will require Class A Roof Assemblies. 33. SPECIAL INSPECTIONS: When a special inspection is required by CBC Section 1704, the architect or engineer of record shall prepare an inspection program that shall be submitted to the Building Official for approval prior to issuance of the building permit. The Town Special Inspection form must be completely filled -out, signed by all requested parties, and be blue -lined on the construction plans. Special Inspection forms are available from the Building Division Service Counter or online at www.losgatosca.gov/building 34. NONPOINT SOURCE POLLUTION STANDARDS SHEET: The Town standard Santa Clara County Valley Nonpoint Source Pollution Control Program Sheet (or Clean Bay Sheet 24x36) shall be part of the plan submittal as the second or third page. The specification sheet is available at the Building Division Service Counter for a fee of $2 or at San Jose Blue Print for a fee. 35. NPDES-C.3 DATA FORMS: Copies of the NPDES C.3 Data Forms (updated based on the final construction drawings) must be blue -lined in full onto the Plans. In the event that this data differs significantly from any Planning approvals, the Town may require recertification of the project's storm water treatment facilities prior to release of the Building Permit. 36. GREEN BUILDING STANDARDS: This project must, at a minimum, be in compliance with the Nonresidential Mandatory Measures of the current California Green Building Standards Code (CGBSC) and all subsequent Amendments. a. Bicycle Parking: Per CGBSC Section 5.106.4.1.1 provide twenty (20) permanently anchored bicycle racks (= 5% of motorized vehicle parking) for short-term bicycle parking or ten (10) two -bike capacity racks. Per CGBSC Section 5.106.4.2 provide secure bicycle lockers for twenty (20) bicycles (= 5% of motorized vehicle parking). Note: Providing showers, changing rooms, and clothes lockers in each building is a voluntary amenity to be considered. b. Designated Parking: Per CGBSC Section 5.106.5.2 provide designated parking for any combination of low -emitting, fuel -efficient, and carpool/van pool vehicles as shown in Table 5.106.5.2 which equals 8% of the proposed parking or a minimum of 32 spaces. c. Electric Vehicle Charging Stations: Per CGBSC Section 5.106.5.3, during construction provide electric vehicle supply equipment and electrical components as listed to facilitate the future installation of (or provide for during construction) electric vehicle charging stations. Per CGBSC Table 5.106.5.3.3, 12 electric vehicle charging stations spaces are required for this project or 3% of the total parking spaces. 37. SITE ACCESSIBILITY: At least one accessible route within the boundary of the site shall be provided from public transportation stops, accessible parking and accessible passenger loading zones and public streets or sidewalks to the accessible building entrance that they serve. The accessible route shall, to the maximum extent feasible, coincide with the route for the general public. At least one accessible route shall connect all accessible buildings, facilities, elements and spaces that are on the same site. 38. ACCESSIBLE PARKING: The parking lots, as well as the parking structure, where parking is provided for the public as clients, guests or employees, shall provide handicap accessible parking. Accessible parking spaces serving a particular building shall be located on the shortest accessible route of travel from adjacent parking to an accessible entrance. In buildings with multiple accessible entrances with adjacent parking, accessible parking spaces shall be dispersed and located closest to the accessible entrances. 39. APPROVALS REQUIRED: The project requires the following departments and agencies approval before issuing a building permit: a. Community Development/Planning Division: Jocelyn Puga at (408) 399-5706 b. Engineering/Parks & Public Works Department: Mike Weisz at 395-5340 c. Santa Clara County Fire Department: (408) 378-4010 d. West Valley Sanitation District: (408) 378-2407 e. Bay Area Air Quality Management District: (415) 771-6000 f. Local School District: The Town will forward the paperwork to the appropriate school district(s) for processing. A copy of the paid receipt is required prior to permit issuance. 40. ADVISORY COMMENTS: a. Allowable Area calculations shall be provided for the subterranean parking garage podium structure and the two-story office building per California Building Code Chapter 5. "r occ. ^* Ple n id d;,. di ig the b ilc •"th permanent railings to limit the balcony are s to less than 750 square feet in order to avoid the requirement for c. The exterior exit stairway from the parking garage is less than 10 feet from the property line. Per 2016 California Building Code Section 1027.5, exterior exit stairways are required to have a fire separation distance of 10 feet from adjacent property lines. One possible solution would be to enclose the stairway in a one -hour rated enclosure. Another option is to move the stairway into the large fan room area. 4mney like „lem„ . -,t to to atie sh„ + . + ider would be to obby chore and Sri through thn o top h I II TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE DIRECTOR OF PARKS AND PUBLIC WORKS: Engineering Division 41. GENERAL: All public improvements shall be made according to the latest adopted Town Standard Plans, Standard Specifications and Engineering Design Standards. All work shall conform to the applicable Town ordinances. The adjacent public right-of-way shall be kept clear of all job -related mud, sift, concrete, dirt and other construction debris at the end of the day. Dirt and debris shall not be washed into storm drainage facilities. The storing of goods and materials on the sidewalk and/or the street will not be allowed unless an encroachment permit is issued by the Engineering Division of the Parks and Public Works Department. The Developer's representative in charge shall be at the job site during all working hours. Failure to maintain the public right-of-way according to this condition may result in the issuance of correction notices, citations, or stop work orders and the Town performing the required maintenance at the Developer's expense. 42. APPROVAL: This application shall be completed in accordance with all of the conditions of approval listed below and in substantial compliance with the latest reviewed and approved development plans. Any changes or modifications to the approved plans or conditions of approvals shall be approved by the Town Engineer. 43. ENCROACHMENT PERMIT: All work in the public right-of-way will require a Construction Encroachment Permit. All work over $5,000 will require construction security. It is the responsibility of the Applicant/Developer to obtain any necessary encroachment permits from affected agencies and private parties, including but not limited to, Pacific Gas and Electric (PG&E), AT&T, Comcast, Santa Clara Valley Water District, California Department of Transportation (Caltrans). Copies of any approvals or permits must be submitted to the Town Engineering Division of the Parks and Public Works Department prior to releasing any permit. 44. FOR PLANTERS: The Applicant shall apply for an encroachment permit for the proposed planters within the public sidewalk and/or public right-of-way. The Applicant shall work with Parks and Public Works Department staff to arrive at a mutually agreeable solution that addresses safety and aesthetic issues. If no solution is reached, the vegetative screening requirement shall be waived. An indemnity agreement for private improvements in the public right-of-way (indemnity agreement) will be required if planters are proposed to be located on public land. A copy of the recorded agreement shall be submitted to the Engineering Division of the Parks and Public Works Department prior to the issuance of any permit. 45. PUBLIC WORKS INSPECTIONS: The Developer or their representative shall notify the Engineering Inspector at least twenty-four (24) hours before starting any work pertaining to on -site drainage facilities, grading or paving, and all work in the Town's right-of-way. Failure to do so will result in penalties and rejection of work that went on without inspection. 46. RESTORATION OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS: The Developer shall repair or replace all existing improvements not designated for removal that are damaged or removed because of the Developer's operations. Improvements such as, but not limited to: curbs, gutters, sidewalks, driveways, signs, pavements, raised pavement markers, thermoplastic pavement markings, etc., shall be repaired and replaced to a condition equal to or better than the original condition. Any new concrete shall be free of stamps, logos, names, graffiti, etc. Any concrete identified that is displaying a stamp or equal shall be removed and replaced at the Contractor's sole expense and no additional compensation shall be allowed therefore, Existing improvement to be repaired or replaced shall be at the direction of the Engineering Construction Inspector, and shall comply with all Title 24 Disabled Access provisions. The Developer shall request a walk-through with the Engineering Construction Inspector before the start of construction to verify existing conditions. 47. SITE SUPERVISION: The General Contractor shall provide qualified supervision on the job site at all times during construction. 48. STREET/SIDEWALK CLOSURE: Any proposed blockage or partial closure of the street and/or sidewalk requires an encroachment permit. Special provisions such as limitations on works hours, protective enclosures, or other means to facilitate public access in a safe manner may be required. 49. PLAN CHECK FEES: Plan check fees shall be deposited with the Town prior to plan review at the Engineering Division of the Parks and Public Works Department. 50. INSPECTION FEES: Inspection fees shall be deposited with the Town prior to the issuance of any permits. 51. PLANS AND STUDIES: All required plans and studies shall be prepared by a Registered Professional Engineer in the State of California, and submitted to the Town Engineer for review and approval. Additionally, any post -project traffic or parking counts, or other studies imposed by the Planning Commission or Town Council shall be funded by the Applicant. 52. GRADING PERMIT: A grading permit is required for all site grading and drainage work except for exemptions listed in Section 12.20.015 of The Code of the Town of Los Gatos (Grading Ordinance). The grading permit application (with grading plans) shall be made to the Engineering Division of the Parks and Public Works Department located at 41 Miles Avenue. The grading plans shall include final grading, drainage, retaining wall location(s), driveway, utilities and interim erosion control. Grading plans shall list earthwork quantities and a table of existing and proposed impervious areas. Unless specifically allowed by the Director of Parks and Public Works, the grading permit will be issued concurrently with the building permit. The grading permit is for work outside the building footprint(s). A separate building permit, issued by the Building Department on E. Main Street, is needed for grading within the building footprint. 53. DRIVEWAY: The driveway conforms to existing pavement on both Winchester Boulevard and Shelburne Way shall be constructed in a manner such that the existing drainage patterns will not be obstructed. 54. PARKING RESTRICTIONS AT DRIVEWAYS: On -street parking shall be prohibited within 15 feet of the proposed driveways on both Winchester Boulevard and Shelburne Way to ensure adequate site distance. 55. DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENT: Prior to the issuance of any grading/improvement permits, whichever comes first, the Applicant shall: a) design provisions for surface drainage; and b) design all necessary storm drain facilities extending to a satisfactory point of disposal for the proper control and disposal of storm runoff; and c) provide a recorded copy of any required easements to the Town. 56. TREE REMOVAL: Copies of all necessary tree removal permits shall be provided prior to the issuance of a grading permit/building permit. 57. SURVEYING CONTROLS: Horizontal and vertical controls shall be set and certified by a licensed surveyor or registered civil engineer qualified to practice land surveying, for the following items: a. Retaining wall: top of wall elevations and locations. b. Toe and top of cut and fill slopes. 58. PRECONSTRUCTION MEETING: Prior to issuance of any permit or the commencement of any site work, the general contractor shall: a. Along with the project applicant, attend a pre -construction meeting with the Town Engineer to discuss the project conditions of approval, working hours, site maintenance and other construction matters; b. Acknowledge in writing that they have read and understand the project conditions of approval and will make certain that all project sub -contractors have read and understand them as well prior to commencing any work, and that a copy of the project conditions of approval will be posted on -site at all times during construction. 59. RETAINING WALLS: A building permit, issued by the Building Department at 110 E. Main Street, may be required for site retaining walls. Walls are not reviewed or approved by the Engineering Division of Parks and Public Works during the grading permit plan review process. 60. CERTIFICATE OF LOT MERGER: A Certificate of Lot Merger shall be recorded. Two (2) copies of the legal description for exterior boundary of the merged parcel and a plat map (8-Y2 in. X 11 in.) shall be submitted to the Engineering Division of the Parks and Public Works Department for review and approval. The submittal shall include closure calculations, title reports less than ninety (90) days old and the appropriate fee. The certificate shall be recorded before any permits may be issued. 61. DEDICATIONS: The following shall be dedicated by separate instrument. The dedication shall be recorded before any permits are issued: a. Winchester Boulevard: A 7-foot width of right-of-way shall be dedicated in fee for street purposes. b. Public Service Easement (PSE): A 10-foot wide easement may be required by the utility companies. 62. SOILS REPORT: One copy of the soils and geologic report shall be submitted with the application. The soils report shall include specific criteria and standards governing site grading, drainage, pavement design, retaining wall design, and erosion control. The reports shall be signed and "wet stamped" by the engineer or geologist, in conformance with Section 6735 of the California Business and Professions Code. 63. GEOLOGY AND SOILS MITIGATION MEASURE: A geotechnical investigation shall be conducted for the project to determine the surface and sub -surface conditions at the site and to determine the potential for surface fault rupture on the site. The geotechnical study shall provide recommendations for site grading as well as the design of foundations, retaining walls, concrete slab -on -grade construction, excavation, drainage, on -site utility trenching and pavement sections. All recommendations of the investigation shall be incorporated into project plans. 64. SOILS REVIEW: Prior to issuance of any permits, the Applicant's engineers shall prepare and submit a design -level geotechnical/geological investigation for review and approval by the Town. The Applicant's soils engineer shall review the final grading and drainage plans to ensure that designs for foundations, retaining walls, site grading, and site drainage are in accordance with their recommendations and the peer review comments. Approval of the Applicant's soils engineer shall then be conveyed to the Town either by letter or by signing the plans. 65. SOiLS ENGINEER CONSTRUCTION OBSERVATION: During construction, all excavations and grading shall be inspected by the Applicant's soils engineer prior to placement of concrete and/or backfill so they can verify that the actual conditions are as anticipated in the design -level geotechnical report, and recommend appropriate changes in the recommendations contained in the report, if necessary. The results of the construction observation and testing shall be documented in an "as -built" letter/report prepared by the Applicant's soils engineer and submitted to the Town before final release of any occupancy permit is granted. 66. SOIL RECOMMENDATIONS: The project shall incorporate the geotechnical/geological recommendations contained in the Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation by Cornerstone Earth Group, dated September 21, 2015, and any subsequently required report or addendum. Subsequent reports or addendum are subject to peer review by the Town's consultant and costs shall be borne by the Applicant. 67. IMPROVEMENTS AGREEMENT: The Applicant shall enter into an agreement to construct public improvements that are part of the development in a form acceptable to the Town in the amount of 100% (performance) and 100% (labor and materials) prior to issuance of any permit. The Applicant shall provide two (2) copies of documents verifying the cost of the public improvements to the satisfaction of the Engineering Division of the Parks and Public Works Department. A copy of the recorded agreement shall be submitted to the Engineering Division of the Parks and Public Works Department prior to the issuance of any permit. 68. JOINT TRENCH PLANS: Joint trench plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Town prior to recordation of a map. The joint trench plans shall include street and/or site lighting and associated photometrics. A letter shall be provided by PG&E stating that public street light billing will by Rule LS2A, and that private lights shall be metered with billing to the homeowners association. Pole numbers, assigned by PG&E, shall be clearly delineated on the plans. 69. WATER DESIGN: Water plans prepared by San Jose Water Company must be reviewed and approved prior to issuance of any permit. 70. WATER METER: The proposed water meters shall be constructed and installed within the property in question, directly behind the public right-of-way line. 71. ELECTRICAL CABINET: The existing electrical cabinet, currently located within the Winchester Boulevard right-of-way, shall be relocated within the property in question, directly behind the public right-of-way line after the required street dedication. The Applicant shall repair and replace to existing Town standards any portion of concrete flatwork within said right-of-way that is damaged during this activity. 72. ELECTRICAL VAULT: The existing electrical vault, currently located within the Winchester Boulevard right-of-way, shall be relocated within the property in question, directly behind the public right-of-way line after the required street dedication. The Applicant shall repair and replace to existing Town standards any portion of concrete flatwork within said right- of-way that is damaged during this activity. 73. SANITARY SEWER CLEANOUT: The sanitary sewer cleanout proposed along the project's Winchester Boulevard frontage shall be constructed and installed within the property in question, directly behind the public right-of-way line after the required street dedication. 74. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS: The following improvements shall be installed by the Developer. Plans for those improvements shall be prepared by a California registered civil engineer, reviewed and approved by the Town, and guaranteed by contract, Faithful Performance Security and Labor & Materials Security before the issuance of a building permit or the recordation of a map. The improvements must be completed and accepted by the Town before a Certificate of Occupancy for any new building can be issued. a. Winchester Boulevard: New curb, gutter, minimum 5-foot detached sidewalk, minimum 4-foot park strip, pavement, street lights, tie-in paving, signing striping, and h3lf_stre,,et p-.v„„ncnt reeert tr.Fet-ie . 2 inch grind and overlay along eastern half of Winchester Boulevard. b. Shelburne Way: New curb, gutter, minimum 5-foot detached sidewalk, minimum 4- foot park strip, half -street pavement reconstruction along the southern half of the roadway, 2-inch grind and overlay along the northern half of the roadway, signing, and striping. c. Bicycle lane: The project shall re -stripe Winchester Boulevard along the project frontage plus necessary conform transition for adding bicycle lanes. The roadway shall be re -surfaced prior to striping. d. Pedestrian crosswalk: The project shall provide a corner bulb -out and a striped high - visibility pedestrian crosswalk crossing Shelburne Way at Winchester Boulevard as directed by Town Engineer. e. Street lights: A new Town standard street light shall be installed on Winchester Boulevard at the corner of Shelburne Way along the project frontage. A new Town standard street light shall be installed on Shelburne Way along the project frontage replacing an existing PG&E street Tight across the project site. The developer shall coordinate with PG&E for the removal and installation. 75. FRONTAGE IMPROVEMENTS: The Applicant shall be required to improve the project's public frontage to current Town Standards. These improvements may include but not limited to curb, gutter, sidewalk, driveway approaches, curb ramp, street lighting (upgrade and/or repaint) etc. The improvements must be completed and accepted by the Town before a Certificate of Occupancy for any new building can be issued. 76. ADA COMPLIANCE: The Applicant shall be required to meet all ADA standards, which must be completed and accepted by the Town before a Certificate of Occupancy for any new building can be issued. This may require additional construction measures as directed by the Town. 77. UNDERGROUND PARKING GARAGE DRAINAGE: Water from the underground parking garage shall not be discharged onto the public street. The Applicant shall design a floor drainage system for the garage that collects all drainage and conveys runoff to the sanitary sewer system. Connecting said drainage system to the storm drain system is not permitted. 78. PARKING LOTS: Parking lots and other impervious areas shall be designed to drain stormwater runoff to vegetated drainage swales, filter strips, and/or other treatment devices that can be integrated into required landscaping areas and traffic islands prior to discharge into the storm drain system and/or public right-of-way. The amount of impervious area associated with parking lots shall be minimized by utilizing design features such as providing compact car spaces, reducing stall dimensions, incorporating efficient parking lanes, and using permeable pavement where feasible. The use of permeable paving for parking surfaces is encouraged to reduce runoff from the site. Such paving shall meet Santa Clara County Fire Department requirements and be structurally appropriate for the location. 79. UTILITIES: The Developer shall install all new, relocated, or temporarily removed utility services, including telephone, electric power and all other communications lines underground, as required by Town Code Section 27.50.015(b). All new utility services shall be placed underground. Underground conduit shall be provided for cable television service. The Applicant is required to obtain approval of all proposed utility alignments from any and all utility service providers before a Certificate of Occupancy for any new building can be issued. The Town of Los Gatos does not approve or imply approval for final alignment or design of these facilities. 80. TRENCHING MORATORIUM: Trenching within a newly paved street will be allowed subject to the following requirements: a. The Town standard "T" trench detail shall be used. b. A Town -approved colored controlled density backfill shall be used. c. All necessary utility trenches and related pavement cuts shall be consolidated to minimize the impacted area of the roadway. d. The total asphalt thickness shall be a minimum of three (3) inches, meet Town standards, or shall match the existing thickness, whichever is greater. The final lift shall be 1.5-inches of one-half (%) inch medium asphalt. The initial lift(s) shall be of three-quarter (3) inch medium asphalt. e. The Contractor shall schedule a pre -paving meeting with the Town Engineering Construction Inspector the day the paving is to take place. f. A slurry seal topping may be required by the construction inspector depending their assessment of the quality of the trench paving. If required, the slurry seal shall extend the full width of the street and shall extend five (5) feet beyond the longitudinal limits of trenching. Slurry seal materials shall be approved by the Town Engineering Construction Inspector prior to placement. Black sand may be required in the slurry mix. All existing striping and pavement markings shall be replaced upon completion of slurry seal operations. All pavement restorations shall be completed and approved by the Inspector before occupancy. 81. SIDEWALK REPAIR: The Developer shall repair and replace to existing Town standards any sidewalk damaged now or during construction of this project. All new and existing adjacent infrastructure must meet current ADA standards. Sidewalk repair shall match existing color, texture and design, and shall be constructed per Town Standard Details. New concrete shall be free of stamps, logos, names, graffiti, etc. Any concrete identified that is displaying a stamp or equal shall be removed and replaced at the Contractor's sole expense and no additional compensation shall be allowed therefore. The limits of sidewalk repair will be determined by the Engineering Construction Inspector during the construction phase of the project. The improvements must be completed and accepted by the Town before a Certificate of Occupancy for any new building can be issued. 82. CURB AND GUTTER REPAIR: The Developer shall repair and replace to existing Town standards any curb and gutter damaged now or during construction of this project. All new and existing adjacent infrastructure must meet Town standards. New curb and gutter shall be constructed per Town Standard Details. New concrete shall be free of stamps, logos, names, graffiti, etc. Any concrete identified that is displaying a stamp or equal shall be removed and replaced at the Contractor's sole expense and no additional compensation shall be allowed therefore. The limits of curb and gutter repair will be determined by the Engineering Construction Inspector during the construction phase of the project. The improvements must be completed and accepted by the Town before a Certificate of Occupancy for any new building can be issued. 83. DRIVEWAY APPROACH: The Developer shall install two (2) Town standard commercial driveway approaches. The new driveway approaches shall be constructed per Town Standard Plans and must be completed and accepted by the Town before a Certificate of Occupancy for any new building can be issued. New concrete shall be free of stamps, logos, names, graffiti, etc. Any concrete identified that is displaying a stamp or equal shall be removed and replaced at the Contractor's sole expense and no additional compensation shall be allowed therefore. 84. CURB RAMPS: The Developer shall construct one (1) curb ramp in compliance with ADA Standards which must be completed and accepted by the Town before a Certificate of Occupancy for any new building can be issued. New concrete shall be free of stamps, logos, names, graffiti, etc. Any concrete identified that is displaying a stamp or equal shall be removed and replaced at the Contractor's sole expense and no additional compensation shall be allowed therefore. 85. SIGHT TRIANGLE AND TRAFFIC VIEW AREA: Any proposed improvements, including but not limiting to trees and hedges, will need to abide by Town Code Sections 23.10.080, 26.10.065, and 29.40.030. 86. FRONTAGE IMPROVEMENTS (TRAFFIC): The Applicant shall construct improvements including and may not be limited to signage, striping, curb/gutter/sidewalk, ADA ramps, pedestrian crosswalk, and street lights as directed by the Town Engineer. The improvements must be completed and accepted by the Town before a Certificate of Occupancy for any new building can be issued. 87. TRANSPORTATION MANAGEMENT PLAN (TDM): The developer shall prepare a Transportation Demand Management Plan for Town of Los Gatos approval prior to the issuance of a building permit. The TDM shall include the measures such as bicycle facility provisions, shower facilities, transit passes and subsidies, carpool incentive, designated car share parking, and other measures that may be required by Town Engineer. The TDM shall also include a TDM coordinator and identify the requirement for an annual TDM effectiveness report to Town of Los Gatos. 88. TRAFFIC STUDY: Any development of land use that generates greater traffic impacts than those assumed in the traffic study report may require an updated traffic study in accordance with the Town's traffic impact policy. 89. TRAFFIC IMPACT MITIGATION FEE: The Developer shall pay the project's proportional share of transportation improvements needed to serve cumulative development within the Town of Los Gatos. The fee amount will be based upon the Town Council resolution in effect at the time the building permit is issued. The fee shall be paid before issuance of a building permit. The final traffic impact mitigation fee for this project shall be calculated from the final plans using the current fee schedule and rate schedule in effect at the time the building permit is issued, using a comparison between the existing and proposed uses. This fee is currently estimated in the amount of $273,306.00. 90. CONSTRUCTION STREET PARKING: No vehicle having a manufacture's rated gross vehicle weight exceeding ten thousand (10,000) pounds shall be allowed to park on the portion of a street which abuts property in a residential zone without prior to approval from the Town Engineer. 91. CONSTRUCTION VEHICLE PARKING: No construction vehicles, trucks, equipment and worker vehicles shall be allowed to park on the portion of any public streets without written approval from Town Engineer. 92. TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN: A traffic control plan is required and must be submitted and approved prior to any work in the public right-of-way. This plan shall include, but not be limited to, the following measures: a. Construction activities shall be strategically timed and coordinated to minimize traffic disruption for schools, residents, businesses, special events, and other projects in the area. The schools located on the haul route shall be contacted to help with the coordination of the trucking operation to minimize traffic disruption. b. Flag persons shall be placed at locations necessary to control one-way traffic flow. All flag persons shall have the capability of communicating with each other to coordinate the operation. c. Prior to construction, advance notification of all affected residents and emergency services shall be made regarding one-way operation, specifying dates and hours of operation. 93. CONSTRUCTION TRAFFIC CONTROL: All construction traffic and related vehicular routes, traffic control plan, and applicable pedestrian or traffic detour plans shall be submitted for review and approval by Town Engineer prior to beginning of any work. 94. ADVANCE NOTIFICATION: Advance notification of all affected residents and emergency services shall be made regarding parking restriction, lane closure or road closure, specify dates and hours of operation. 95. SCHOL DROP-OFF AND PICK-UP: No construction activities affecting normal traffic flow shall be permitted during school drop-off and pick-up periods. 96. HAULING OF SOIL: Hauling of soil on- or off -site shall not occur during the morning or evening peak periods (between 7:00 a.m. and 9:00 a.m. and between 4:00 p.m. and 6:00 p.m.), and at other times as specified by the Director of Parks and Public Works. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the Developer shall work with the Town Building Department and Engineering Division Inspectors to devise a traffic control plan to ensure safe and efficient traffic flow under periods when soil is hauled on or off of the project site. This may include, but is not limited to provisions for the Developer to place construction notification signs noting the dates and time of construction and hauling activities, or providing additional traffic control. Coordination with other significant projects in the area may also be required. Cover all trucks hauling soil, sand and other loose debris. 97. CONSTRUCTION HOURS: All subdivision improvements and site improvements construction activities, including the delivery of construction materials, labors, heavy equipment, supplies, etc., shall be limited to the hours of 8:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m., weekdays and 9:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. weekends and holidays. The Town may authorize, on a case -by -case basis, alternate construction hours. The Applicant shall provide written notice twenty-four (24) hours in advance of modified construction hours. Approval of this request is at discretion of the Town. 98. CONSTRUCTION NOISE: Between the hours of 8:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m., weekdays and 9:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. weekends and holidays, construction, alteration or repair activities shall be allowed. No individual piece of equipment shall produce a noise level exceeding eighty-five (85) dBA at twenty-five (25) feet from the source. If the device is located within a structure on the property, the measurement shall be made at distances as close to twenty-five (25) feet from the device as possible. The noise level at any point outside of the property plane shall not exceed eighty-five (85) dBA. 99. CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT PLAN SHEET: Prior to the issuance of any permits, the Applicant shall submit a construction management plan sheet (full-size) within the plan set that shall incorporate at a minimum the Earth Movement Plan, Traffic Control Plan, Project Schedule, site security fencing, employee parking, construction staging area, materials storage area(s), construction trailer(s), concrete washout(s) and proposed outhouse location(s). Please refer to the Town's Construction Management Plan Guidelines document for additional information. 100. WVSD (West Valley Sanitation District): Sanitary sewer laterals are televised by West Valley Sanitation District and approved by the Town of Los Gatos before they are used, A Sanitary Sewer Clean -out is required for each property at the property line, or at a location specified by the Town. 101. SANITARY SEWER BACKWATER VALVE: Drainage piping serving fixtures which have flood level rims less than twelve (12) inches (304.8 mm) above the elevation of the next upstream manhole and/or flushing inlet cover at the public or private sewer system serving such drainage piping shall be protected from backflow of sewage by installing an approved type backwater valve. Fixtures above such elevation shall not discharge through the backwater valve, unless first approved by the Building Official. The Town shall not incur any liability or responsibility for damage resulting from a sewer overflow where the property owner or other person has failed to install a backwater valve as. defined in the Uniform Plumbing Code adopted by the Town and maintain such device in a functional operation condition. Evidence of West Sanitation District's decision on whether a backwater device is needed shall be provided prior to the issuance of a building permit. 102. STORMWATER MANAGEMENT: Construction activities including but not limited to clearing, stockpiling, grading or excavation of land, which disturbs one (1) acre or more which are part of a larger common plan of development which disturbs less than one (1) acre are required to obtain coverage under the construction general permit with the State Water Resources Control Board. The Applicant is required to provide proof of WDID# and keep a current copy of the storm water pollution prevention plan (SWPPP) on the construction site and shall be made available to the Town of Los Gatos Engineering Division of the Parks and Public Works Department and/or Building Department upon request. 103. BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES (BMPs): The Applicant is responsible for ensuring that all contractors are aware of all storm water quality measures and that such measures are implemented. Best Management Practices (BMPs) shall be maintained and be placed for all areas that have been graded or disturbed and for all material, equipment and/or operations that need protection. Removal of BMPs (temporary removal during construction activities) shall be replaced at the end of each working day. Failure to comply with the construction BMP will result in the issuance of correction notices, citations, or stop work orders. 104. STORMWATER DEVELOPMENT RUNOFF: All new development and redevelopment projects are subject to the stormwater development runoff requirements. Every Applicant shall submit a stormwater control plan and implement conditions of approval that reduce stormwater pollutant discharges through the construction, operation and maintenance of treatment measures and other appropriate source control and site design measures. Increases in runoff volume and flows shall be managed in accordance with the development runoff requirements. 105. LANDSCAPING: In finalizing the landscape plan for the biotreatment area(s), it is recommended that the landscape architect ensure that the characteristics of the selected plants are similar to those of the plants listed for use in bioretention areas in Appendix D of the Santa Clara Valley Urban Runoff Pollution Prevention Program (SCVURPPP) C.3 Stormwater Handbook. 106, EROSION CONTROL: Interim and final erosion control plans shall be prepared and submitted to the Engineering Division of the Parks and Public Works Department. A Notice of Intent (NOI) and Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) shall be submitted to the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board for projects disturbing more than one (1) acre. A maximum of two (2) weeks is allowed between clearing of an area and stabilizing/building on an area if grading is allowed during the rainy season. Interim erosion control measures, to be carried out during construction and before installation of the final landscaping, shall be included. Interim erosion control method shall include, but are not limited to: silt fences, fiber rolls (with locations and details), erosion control blankets, Town standard seeding specification, filter berms, check dams, retention basins, etc. Provide erosion control measures as needed to protect downstream water quality during winter months. The grading, drainage, erosion control plans and SWPPP shall be in compliance with applicable measures contained in the amended provisions C.3 and C,14 of most current Santa Clara County National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Municipal Regional Permit (MRP). Monitoring for erosion and sediment control is required and shall be performed by the Qualified SWPPP Developer (QSD) or Qualified SWPPP Practitioner (QSP) as required by the Construction General Permit. Stormwater samples are required for all discharge locations and projects may not exceed limits set forth by the Construction General Permit Numeric Action Levels and/or Numeric Effluent Levels. A Rain Event Action Plan (REAP) must be developed forty-eight (48) hours prior to any likely precipitation even, defined by a fifty (50) percent or greater probability as determined by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), and/or whenever rain is imminent. The QSD or QSP must print and save records of the precipitation forecast for the project location area from (http://www.srh.noaa.gov/forecast) which must accompany monitoring reports and sampling test data. A rain gauge is required on -site. The Town of Los Gatos Engineering Division of the Parks and Public Works Department and the Building Department will conduct periodic NPDES inspections of the site throughout the recognized storm season to verify compliance with the Construction General Permit and Stormwater ordinances and regulations. 107. DUST CONTROL: Blowing dust shall be reduced by timing construction activities so that paving and building construction begin as soon as possible after completion of grading, and by landscaping disturbed soils as soon as possible. Further, water trucks shall be present and in use at the construction site. All portions of the site subject to blowing dust shall be watered as often as deemed necessary by the Town, or a minimum of three (3) times daily, or apply (non -toxic) soil stabilizers on all unpaved access roads, parking areas, and staging areas at construction sites in order to insure proper control of blowing dust for the duration of the project. Watering on public streets shall not occur. Streets shall be cleaned by street sweepers or by hand as often as deemed necessary by the Town Engineer, or at least once a day. Watering associated with on -site construction activity shall take place between the hours of 8 a.m. and 5 p.m. and shall include at least one (1) late -afternoon watering to minimize the effects of blowing dust. All public streets soiled or littered due to this construction activity shall be cleaned and swept on a daily basis during the workweek to the satisfaction of the Town. Demolition or earthwork activities shall be halted when wind speeds (instantaneous gusts) exceed twenty-five (25) miles per hour (MPH). All trucks hauling soil, sand, or other loose debris shall be covered, 108. CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES: All construction shall conform to the latest requirements of the CASQA Stormwater Best Management Practices Handbooks for Construction Activities and New Development and Redevelopment, the Town's grading and erosion control ordinance, and other generally accepted engineering practices for erosion control as required by the Town Engineer when undertaking construction activities. 109. SITE DRAINAGE: No through curb drains will be allowed. Any storm drain inlets (public or private) directly connected to public storm system shall be stenciled/signed with appropriate "NO DUMPING - Flows to Bay" NPDES required language. No improvements shall obstruct or divert runoff to the detriment of an adjacent, downstream or down slope property. 110. STORM WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN: A storm water management shall be included with the grading permit application for all Group 1 and Group 2 projects as defined in the amended provisions C.3 of the Municipal Regional Stormwater NPDES Permit, Order R2- 2015-0049, NPDES Permit No. CAS612008. The plan shall delineate source control measures and BMPs together with the sizing calculations. The plan shall be certified by a professional pre -qualified by the Town. In the event that the storm water measures proposed on the Planning approval differ significantly from those certified on the Building/Grading Permit, the Town may require a modification of the Planning approval prior to release of the Building Permit. The Applicant may elect to have the Planning submittal certified to avoid this possibility. 111. STORM WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN NOTES: The following note shall be added to the storm water management plan: "The biotreatment soil mix used in all stormwater treatment landscapes shall comply with the specifications in Attachment L of the MRP. Proof of compliance shall be submitted by the Contractor to the Town of Los Gatos a minimum of thirty (30) days prior to delivery of the material to the job site using the Biotreatment Soil Mix Supplier Certification Statement." 112. STORM WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN CERTIFICATION: Certification from the biotreatment soils provider is required and shall be given to Engineering Division Inspection staff a minimum of thirty (30) days prior to delivery of the material to the job site. Additionally deliver tags from the soil mix shall also be provided to Engineering Division Inspection staff. Sample Certification can be found here: http://www.scvurppp-w2k.com/nd wp.shtm(?zoom highlight=BIOTREATMENT+SOIL. 113. AGREEMENT FOR STORMWATER BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE OBLIGATIONS: The property owner shall enter into an agreement with the Town for maintenance of the stormwater filtration devices required to be installed on this project by the Town's Stormwater Discharge Permit and all current amendments or modifications. The agreement shall specify that certain routine maintenance shall be performed by the property owner and shall specify device maintenance reporting requirements. The agreement shall also specify routine inspection requirements, permits and payment of fees, The agreement shall be recorded, and a copy of the recorded agreement shall be submitted to the Engineering Division of the Parks and Public Works Department, prior to the release of any occupancy permits. 114. SILT AND MUD IN PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY: It is the responsibility of Contractor and homeowner to make sure that all dirt tracked into the public right-of-way is cleaned up on a daily basis. Mud, silt, concrete and other construction debris SHALL NOT be washed into the Town's storm drains. 115. OUTDOOR TRASH ENCLOSURES: Outdoor trash enclosures shall be covered and provided with area drains connected to the sanitary sewer per current NPDES requirements before a Certificate of Occupancy for any new building can be issued. Connecting said drainage system to the storm drain system is not permitted. 116. GOOD HOUSEKEEPING: Good housekeeping practices shall be observed at all times during the course of construction. All construction shall be diligently supervised by a person or persons authorized to do so at all times during working hours. The Developer's representative in charge shall be at the job site during all working hours. Failure to maintain the public right-of-way according to this condition may result in penalties and/or the Town performing the required maintenance at the Developer's expense. 117. NEIGHBORHOOD CONSTRUCTION COMMUNICATION PLAN: Immediately upon approval of an encroachment permit, the Applicant shall initiate a weekly neighborhood email notification program to provide project status updates. The email notices shall also be posted on a bulletin board placed in a prominent location along the project perimeter. 118. COVERED TRUCKS: All trucks transporting materials to and from the site shall be covered. TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE SANTA CLARA COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT: 119. FIRE SPRINKLERS REQUIRED: Approved automatic sprinkler systems in new buildings and existing buildings and structures shall be provided in the locations described in this Section or Section 903.2.1 through 9032.18 whichever is the more restrictive. For the purposes of this Section, firewalls used to separate building areas shall be constructed in accordance with the California Building Code and shall be without openings or penetrations. Note: The owner(s), occupant(s), and any contractor(s) or subcontractor(s) are responsible for consulting with the water purveyor of record in order to determine if any modifications or upgrade of the existing water service is required. A State of California licensed (C-16) Fire Protection Contractor shall submit plans, calculations, a completed permit application, and appropriate fees to this department for review and approval prior to beginning their work. CFC Section 903.2 as adopted and amended by LGTC. 120. WATER SUPPLY REQUIREMENTS: Potable water supplies shall be protected from contamination caused by fire protection water supplies. It is the responsibility of the applicant and any contractors and subcontractors to contact the water purveyor supplying the site of such project, and to comply with the requirements of that purveyor. Such requirements shall be incorporated into the design of any water -based fire protection systems, and/or fire suppression water supply systems or storage containers that may be physically connected in any manner to an appliance capable of causing contamination of the potable water supply of the purveyor of record. Final approval of that system(s) under consideration will not be granted by this office until compliance with the requirements of the water purveyor are documented by that purveyor as having been met by the applicant(s). 2010 CFC Sec. 903.3.5 and Health and Safety Code 13114.7. 121, HOSE VALVES/STANDPIPES REQUIRED: Hose valves/standpipes shall be installed as per the 2013 CFC Sec. 905, or where emergency access has been deemed minimal, shall be equipped with standpipes designed per NFPA Std. #14, and be equipped with 2-1/2" inch hose valves, located within the stair enclosure(s). Note specifically, within parking structure(s) at stairwells and on podium within courtyard. CFC Sec. 905 as adopted and amended by CUPMC. 122. FIRE ALARM REQUIREMENTS: A manual fire alarm system shall be installed in Group B occupancies where one of the following conditions exists: The Group B load is more than 100 persons above or below the lowest level of exit discharge. Alarm systems shall comply with this code and with the currently adopted edition of NFPA 72 907.2.2 Group B. 123. EMERGENCY RESPONDER RADIO COVERAGE: Emergency responder radio coverage in new buildings. All new buildings shall have approved radio coverage for emergency responders within the building based upon the existing coverage levels of the public safety communication systems of the jurisdiction at the exterior of the building. This section shall not require improvement of the existing public safety communication systems. 124. FIRE PROTECTION AND UTILITY EQUIPMENT IDENTIFICATION AND ACCESS: Fire protection equipment shall be identified in an approved manner. Rooms containing controls for air-conditioning systems, sprinkler risers and vales, or other fire detection, suppression or control elements shall be identified for the use of the fire department. Approved signs required to identify fire protection equipment and equipment location shall be constructed of durable materials, permanently installed and readily visible. 125. CONSTRUCTION FIRE SAFETY: All construction sites must comply with applicable provisions of the CFC Chapter 33 and our Standard Detail and Specification SI-7. Provide appropriate notations on subsequent plan submittals, as appropriate to the project. CFC Chapter 33. 126, ADDRESS IDENTIFICATION: New and existing buildings shall have approved address numbers, building numbers or approved building identification placed in a position that is plainly legible and visible from the street or road fronting the property. These numbers shall contrast with their background. Where required by the fire code official, address numbers shall be provided in additional approved locations to facilitate emergency response. Address numbers shall be Arabic numbers or alphabetical letters. Numbers shall be a minimum of 4 inches (101.6 mm) high with a minimum stroke width of 0.5 inch (12.7 mm), Where access is by means of a private road and the building cannot be viewed from the public way, a monument, pole or other signs or means shall be used to identify the structure. Address numbers shall be maintained. CFC Section 505.1 N:\DEV\CONDITIONS\2017\Winchester Blvd 15860-15894.docx This Page Intentionally Left Blank Valley Oak Partners, LLC 7:14 the AliatiEils7 `.41,0 ilp.” E. 9+, t l 401i ;'a 9'm March, 14, 2017 Community Development Department Town of Los Gatos 110 E. Main Street Los Gatos, CA 95030 Re: 15860, 15880 and 15894 Winchester Blvd Project Submittal Summary of Changes Ms. Puga: v VALLEY OAK PARTNERS The following is a summary of changes made to the project as part of the resubmittal made March 14, 2017: 1. Shifted building away from Winchester We examined pushing the building back and determined that we could push the building an additional 6 feet away from Winchester Blvd. Pushing beyond this distance would result in elimination of all trees along the eastern property line and create drainage and water treatment difficulties. By pushing back 6 feet, we were able to increase our setbacks from Winchester to 35.9' at the corner of Shelburne and 44.4' across the front of the building (vs. a required 25 feet). Pushing the building back 6 feet did result in the elimination of two additional trees (#25 and #40). However, we were able to save one additional tree along the front of the building that was previously marked for removal (tree #8) strengthening the visual landscape appeal along Winchester Blvd with the addition of the tree in front. 2. Reduction in Height We took a step back and relooked at how to approach reducing height along Winchester. As we examined the building, we realized that the center section of the building will be concealed by the large existing trees we are retaining (#8, 9, and 16), as well as the Shelburne side (#2 and 3). There were however two 'windows" between these existing trees that required rethinking and architectural changes. The first change we made was to change the roof style along the northern portion of the building from a front -to -back gable roof with a peak ridgeline to a shed roof running south to north. This created a substantial reduction in peak height along this portion of the building (from 32'2" down to 24'10") and also reduced the eave height slightly from 25'6" down to 24'10". We then looked at the southem portion of the building along the University Oaks and determined a redesign was needed. By shifting the elevator shaft and bathroom locations inward, we were able to redesign the southern portion of the building into a single story element with a max height less than 20'. This area extended the building away from the Shelburne side an additional 16.5' so that the two-story element of the building how starts 94.5" away from the southern property line (vs a prior 78'). 3. Elimination of"tall" architectural features We eliminated several of the "tall" architectural features including one of the shed roof towers (the only remaining one is now toward the south and necessitated by our stairwell and roof access requirements. We also eliminated one of the pop-up "chimney" towers along the southern rear of the building. } BIT 2 3 4. Change in building materials We added a substantial amount of the wood siding material, eliminating plaster areas, while also changing the style of siding. For the remaining plaster areas, we darkened the color. The result is a building that has a strengthened residential feel, with the colors and materials created a much more natural, earthen feeling. 5. Relocation of subterranean garage vent We moved the vent location away from the southern property line and are now venting vertically through the stairwell location within the building up through the roof 6. Decorative Metal Panel Per our statement at the prior hearing, we eliminated the decorative metal panel running along the perimeter edge of the parking structure and replaced with a 42" masonry wall. This will serve the dual purpose of eliminating any perceived headlight issues, while adding an additional level of protection against vehicles accidentally driving over the edge of the parking structure. 7. Additional new tree plantings While not able to retain any additional existing trees, we were able to add three additional new tree plantings. These were strategically located along the front of the building to help accomplish the suggestion by commissioners that the landscaping help screen the building and let the building "disappear." 8. Updated the plan sheets to match the Arborist Report #5 dated June 10, 2016 Summary Tree Table. Arborist Report #6 dated July 22, 2016 did not include a tree table (provided pruning and sidewalk installation guidelines), and Report #5 is the most recent table. Please let us know if you have any questions regarding the changes. Regards, Doug Rich April 7, 2017 Community Development Department Town of Los Gatos 110 E. Main Street Los Gatos, CA 95030 Re: 15860, 15880 and 15894 Winchester Blvd Project Submittal Summary of Changes -Addendum Ms. Puga: RECEIVED APR 0 7 701 TOWN OF LOS GATOS PLANNING DIVISION VALLEY OAK PARTNERS 0 Our March 14, 2017 letter summarized many of the changes made to the project in response to comments made by Commissioners and neighbors at the January 25, 2017 hearing. As a companion to the letter, we felt that it would be helpful to include a visual summary of the changes made showing a before and after. Such presentation accompanies this letter. In addition, we wanted to address several additional comments made at the January 25, 2017 hearing: 1. Meet with Neighbors to discuss plan revisions We held a community meeting on February 161'') and a follow-up meeting on March 2nd. The meetings were collaborative and resulted in many of the changes reflected in the plans. Not every request by neighbors could be accommodated, but many were and resulted in project improvements. This has been a wonderful group to interact with and a great example of how a process should be run. Reflects extremely positive on the quality of citizens within the Town. 2. Meeting with Safe Routes to Schools We met with Safe Routes to School Coordinator Karen Briones and reviewed the project details, driveway locations, and Winchester frontage improvements. We discussed traffic circulation relative to Walk 'n Roll school routes along Winchester and surrounding area. Karen felt that the improvements (particularly the bulbouts for crossing Shelburne) would enhance the route to school and did not express any concerns with project design. Regards, Doug Rich. Attachment: Visual Summary of Project Revisions EXUIBIT 2 4 This Page Intentionally Left Blank WINCHESTER BLVD. OFFICE - LOS GATOS, CA Summary of Project Revisions k GATES *ASSOC IATES VALLEY OAK ?PARTNERS STUDIO T SQUARE LEGENtr---- JAN 2017 PC-H-EARJNG al REVISED SETBACK SHIFTED BUILDING ADDITIONAL 6' AWAY FROM WINCHESTER BLVD. Winchester Blvd. Office, Los Gatos, CA I 0 STUDO T SOUA,RE ArtIvIentgre Manning WINCHESTER BLVD L. Nt wpm, more 1 Ei X if — } - Z CC D m J LIl 2' N ct` AP�f'IC'NAI rftFE � TO RVF LEGEND: K ti cWflfl Munn COMM w ..P Dr Wttl G CAMP 4L4e IMP 0I..0AIC6 %EIAL .rl CO cum mx 4.M arrow w Dsr.WA1 01 UM 4r COCK. M F1[C1nC p4R. M toe. or .ilt5Pt mg. MPS COMM 1.0 MOO 1r P.vmo 14p0. LOW UK Far Far promo nI1M1 Or UM o Mum DC 011Aa COMM MILLO4 rACI1(A0M 4FC MUM A, MK, M ry w.ou. omm w .Wc.l now AL AM PC. Olaf, 0/x 0KAx1AD K MOIMITY COMM .W .t1AMM6 WI - aft, A4xr-o.-W44 A MISR L TO RL a..LV7 EV x tummy %WIT Wu lgt WWI STO. PM* PAIMOLL M4 tM 11141 muo an rG 100 01 COM r0. 10. or line mE IN 0r a.m rr TOP 00 (11Unr roc m° Or IOLt10 Coe W em M Mill 0/1 0.DPG.00O .CP 011Wrnn. CIAI PIM m VOA. WA11. 4MM .OII -1(0- cat MM.. M. -E- =CCIWCAI 41.4 old ILL -f4- i+N mlY SCAM LIM -50- 01MI DAM LWr - - Maim. pet m0 1(04 X MU TO 14 0IW0K0 ma To I(*1 V 0 GRAPHIC SCALE BUILDING SHIFT ELIMINATED 2 ADDITIONAL TREES ALONG Winchester Blvd. Office, Los Gatos, CA REAR & SAVED 1 ADDITIONAL TREE ALONG WINCHESTER VALLEY OAK ,:„1:1 PARTNERS STUDIO T SQUARE ORIGINAL BUILDING DESIGN AS SHOWN AT PLANNING COMMISSION REVISED BUILDING DESIGN Note: Building height as shown measured from sidewalk glade, we recognize building height maximum per Town code is measured from ous;ng grade, but are showing these heights as that is Vantage point of paaserbys). REDUCED BUILDING HEIGHTS Winchester Blvd. Office, Los Gatos, CA ' STUDIO SQUARE '. URan Oeslgn ORIGINAL BUILDING DESIGN AS SHOWN AT PLANNING COMMISSION REDESIGNED ROOF FROM: (A) FRONT -TO -BACK RIDGE, TO (B) SHED ROOF TO HELP REDUCE BUILDING HEIGHT REVISED BUILDING DESIGN Winchester Blvd. Office, Los Gatos, CA VALLEY OAK012 PARTNERS STUDIO T SOUAPE wwrna. Ilmnan 1 : MVp: BUILDING DESIGN AS SHOWN AT PLANNING COMMISSION REVISED BUILDING DESIGN REDESIGNED SOUTHERN PORTION OF BUILDING TO REDUCE HEIGHT AGAINST ADJACENT NEIGHBORS Winchester Blvd. Office, Los Gatos, CA d . • n7 igi Bfi�lCNN'IN1111f►)lgl�tllttutttti�gt�tlt�tlJttt�[tnitlrrrt 1 I..I 1-; $ LLEvi<.dc PARTHER5 r„,„,ST ,Th T SCUA E Archnecture . Mann, ORIGINAL BUILDING DESIGN AS SHOWN AT PLANNING COMMISSION ELIMINATED "TALL" ARCHITECTURAL FEATURES I Winchester Blvd. Office, Los Gatos, CA I 12 YALL±:Y OAK PARTNERS 0 STUDIO ELIMINATED "TALL" ARCHITECTURAL FEATURES I Winchester Blvd. Office, Los Gatos, CA I VALLEY OAIC PARTNERS 1:12 STUDk0 IT SQUARE ,letrittniare Flaming Urtmn Drerip RELOCATED GARAGE VENT AWAY FROM SOUTHERN PROPERTY LINE 1*1 �m T LOCATION. | Winchester Blvd. Office, Los Gatos, [A | VAuFY DAK �Av`wcPS�� STUDIO ,oUARE DECORATIVE METAL PANEL REPLACED WITH WALL FOR LIGHT MITIGATION & ADDED SAFETY Winchester Blvd. Office, Los Gatos, CA. VALLEY EP.S PARTHEP.S STUDIO TSQUARE e. ORIGINAL BUILDING DESIGN AS SHOWN AT PLANNING COMMISSION REVISED BUILDING DESIGN - INCREASED SIDING & MORE TRADITIONAL STYLE REVISED MATERIALS, COLORS AND WINDOW FORMS TO INCREASE RESIDENTIAL "FEEL" & NEIGHBORHOOD COMPATIBILITY Winchester Blvd. Office, Los Gatos, CA EIGI VALLEY" OAK P A R PF E PS rSTUDIO IT'SQUASE taiat*Omm thblin 1.1pi Jocelyn Puga To: Doug Rich Subject: RE: Thank you From: Doug Rich[mailto:doug©valleyoakpartners.comj Sent: Friday, February 17, 2017 1:19 PM To: Jocelyn Puga Subject: Re: Thank you Meeting attendees attached. Doug Rich 734 The Alameda I San Jose, CA 95126 T 408.282.0995 I F 408.282.9797 I C 925.570.4593 i Office DEPOT. 1,500-40-DEPOT (1-000 03-3759) errry,oftl.o., la cam wrnkolf IteA.poLc. ki a Ai -10-- 1 - T) t:ta.- k) P • _iff.,e _I ae,.,_ c 4?-4/me., tha/4i-gaile-exj„ 3:- G(A)jipict 3 e-orge— 47, e.-1-0 sfr.), e-e) q £ t314, AI chok_ Plym _rnekec4,4, "ficasiviet , Cl.A. 4-- -c_g_._..-_-, '--V•,c---7 c c: _C-Lf\cr-kt.,-,..,_ \ P44 jag, lirkasiV11ePeil 0 Alt . CA y10.% _au., 4-/ 97,.. ir-lb , Go-145-1 ( 0 I ) 1 'fr i 3 ...., or ts- -ir 2 HEXAGON TASOTATIOM CONSULTANTS, INC. March 31, 2017 Mr. Doug Rich Valley Oak Partners, LLC 734 The Alameda San Jose, CA 95126 Re: Response to Traffic Comments on Winchester Boulevard Office Project Dear Mr. Rich: Hexagon Transportation Consultants, Inc. completed a traffic study for your proposed office project on Winchester Boulevard at Shelburne Way in Los Gatos, California. The project was discussed at the Los Gatos Planning Commission meeting of January 25. There were two traffic -related items raised by the commission: (1) can turning left out of the surface parking lot be prohibited, and (2) should a crosswalk or traffic signal be installed at Shelburne/Winchester? The following is a discussion of these questions. 1. Can turning left out of the surface parking lot be prohibited? Response: Hexagon does not recommend prohibiting left turns, either in or out, at the surface parking lot. Reasons for this recommendation include: (i) the diverted traffic would impact surrounding neighborhood streets and create problems of its own. (ii) there is no safety or queuing need, and (ii) there would be implementation constraints and could be unintended consequences. DIVERTED TRAFFIC Prohibiting left turns out of the project driveway would be problematic because it would impact local neighborhood streets. In order to head south on Winchester Blvd, vehicles would turn right to exit the project driveway, immediately enter the left turn lane for Via Serena and then, depending on time availability, either (a) turn into Via Sereno for a three-point turn, or (b) perform a legal U- turn. Vehicles wishing to make a left turn into the driveway, and being prevented from doing so, would probably turn right into Bruce Avenue and then make a three-point turn to head north on Winchester Blvd. and make a right turn into the driveway. Such maneuvers would unnecessarily add traffic impacts to Via Sereno and to Bruce Avenue. SAFETY AND QUEUING The traffic study showed that the peak -hour demand would be for a maximum of 6 vehicles to turn left into this driveway during the AM peak hour and 6 vehicles to turn left out during the PM peak hour (see attached Figure). These estimates were derived by counting other office buildings in Los Gatos and determining a trip rate based on building square footage. The trip rate was applied to this proposed building of 30,070 square feet. The trips were proportioned to the two parking lots: one parking lot off of Winchester Boulevard and one off of Shelburne Way. The parking lot on Winchester Blvd. would have 41 parking spaces, and the lot on Shelburne Way would have 87 spaces. Therefore, 32% of the trips were assigned to the Winchester driveway, and 68% were assigned to the Shelburne driveway. This yields an estimate of 6 vehicles using the Winchester driveway during the highest hour. This is only one car every 10 minutes. The study showed that there are adequate gaps in traffic on 4 North Second Street, Suite 400 • San Jose, California 95113 phone 408.971.6100 • fax 408.971.6102 • www.hextrans.com EXHIBIT 2 6 /—'411 Mr. Doug Rich March 31, 2017 116-41111 Page 2 of 3 Winchester Boulevard to accommodate these turns. In addition, there is a two-way center turn lane on Winchester Boulevard to facilitate turns into and out of the driveway. This configuration is typical throughout the Town of Los Gatos. Field review shows that the sight distance at the proposed driveway is all the way to Blossom Hill Road in one direction and past Daves Avenue in the other direction. These distances are safe for speeds exceeding the current traffic speeds. The study recommends that on -street parking be prohibited within 15 feet of the driveway to ensure adequate sight distance is maintained. When added to the adjacent driveway aisle and red curb, , there would be a stretch of about approximately 85 feet with no parking allowed, which facilitates sight distance. View Toward Blossom Hill Road Showing Sight Distance IMPLEMENTATION Left turns can be prevented in three fashions: with signage, pork -chop islands, or median islands. In Hexagon's experience, both signs and pork -chop islands are ineffective because motorists can easily ignore them or drive around them. Median islands are the most effective way to prohibit left turns. A median island at the driveway to the surface parking lot would need to be relatively small V.-414i Mr. Doug Rich March 31, 2017 111 Page 3 of 3 to avoid blocking other driveways where left turns currently are allowed. Small islands can create safety issues because motorists do not expect them and/or do not see them, and they can lose control upon striking an island. Also, because small islands get hit often, they require frequent maintenance. 2, Should a crosswalk or signal be installed at Shelburne/Winchester? Response: Hexagon does not recommend a crosswalk or signal at the intersection of Shelburne Way and Winchester Boulevard. Reasons for this recommendation include: (1) a traffic signal is not warranted, (ii) a traffic signal could create unintended consequences, and (iii) a traffic signal with crosswalks is located one block away at Daves Avenue. SIGNAL WARRANT Traffic signals are expensive to install and operate, and they can actually increase delay and accidents if used in the wrong situation. Therefore, the traffic engineering community has established a set of criteria, called "warrants," that should be met before a signal is considered. The warrants consider traffic volume, delay, pedestrian volume, and accident history. The warrants have been checked for Shelburne Way at Winchester Boulevard, and none of the warrants would be met at that intersection. Therefore, a traffic signal is not recommended. UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCES Along with a traffic signal, standard signalized intersection design dictates that a left turn pocket would need to be installed at Shelburne Way. The left turn pocket at Shelburne Way would mean that left turns would need to be cut off at Via Sereno. Therefore, one consequence of a signal at Shelburne is that left turns would no longer be allowed at Via Sereno. Also, a signal would encourage school children to cross Winchester Boulevard at Shelburne Way rather than at Daves Avenue where there is a crossing guard. Either the school would need to spend extra money to supply a second crossing guard, or children would have to be discouraged from crossing at Shelburne Way. WALKING TO SCHOOL The Commission was concerned about the safety of school children walking to Daves Avenue School. Hexagon believes that adequate safety for children already is provided by the traffic signal at Daves Avenue. This signal has pedestrian signal heads and is augmented with a crossing guard before and after school. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, HEXAGON TRANSPORTATION CONSULTANTS, INC. Gary K. Black President This Page Intentionally Left Blank Jocelyn Puga From: Bryan Mekechuk <bryan.mekechuk©comcast.net> Sent: Wednesday, February 08, 2017 9:20 AM To: 'Doug Rich' Cc: Andrew Spyker'; 'Georgina Van Horn'; 'Shauna Prout Garzee'; Jocelyn Puga Subject: Los Gatos - VTA Changes/Next Network Hi Doug, I would like you to be aware of proposed changes to the current bus routes and schedules in Los Gatos. Here is an e- mail that I received from the Town of Los Gatos: The Town's Transportation and Parking Commission will be hosting a presentation by the VTA as part of its meeting on Thursday at 6pm in the Town Council Chambers. Take this opportunity to find out about the plan and provide your input. The meeting agenda can be found here: http:JJwww.town.los-gatos.ca.us/AgendaCe... More information on the VTA program, called the Next Network, can be found here: http:/Jwww.vta.orq/proiects-and-programs.. Best regards, Bryan Bryan Mekechuk 408.655.0400 EXHCBIT 2 7 1 Jocelyn Puga From: Bryan Mekechuk <bryan.mekechuk@comcast.net> Seat: Wednesday, February 08, 2017 4:48 PM To: 'Doug Rich' Cc: 'Andrew Spyker'; `Georgina Van Horn'; 'Shauna Prout Garzee'; lindalanzl@gmaiLcom; karenvincent@msn.com; kurtzk@comcast.net; sfrollin@gmail.com; sinclair.joanne@gmaiLcom; 'A KUMAR: joannepeth@gmail.com; hudponyl@gmaiLcom; brcarr10@gmail.com; Jocelyn Puga Subject: RE: 15860-15894 Winchester Blvd - Follow Up Meeting My apologies for not being clear - I'm looking for cross sections of the existing natural grade, knowing that the building hasn't been completed yet; nothing can 'change' the existing natural grade. I can estimate the existing natural grade by looking at the elevations by each tree but simply having a cross section of the existing natural grade would make it much clearer and easier to understand, regardless of the dimensions of the proposed building. The existing natural grade data should be in the BIM software so the 'layer' to show is merely the existing natural grade. Does this clarify what I am interested in? From: Doug Rich [mailto:doug@vafleyoakpartners.comj Sent: Wednesday, February 08, 2017 4:36 PM To: bryan.mekechuk@comcast.net Cc: Andrew Spyker <awspyker@gmail.com>; Georgina Van Horn <george_vh@msn.com>; Shauna Prout Garzee <s,pgarzee@hotmail.com>; lindalanzl@gmailcom; karenvincent@msn.com; kurtzk@comcast.net; sfrollin@gmail.com; sinclair.joanne@gmail.com; A KUMAR <ackumarusa@gmail.com>; joannepeth@gmaiLcom; hudponyl@gmaiLcom; brcarrl0@gmaiLcom; Jocelyn Puga <jpuga@losgatosca.gov> Subject: Re: 15860-15894 Winchester Blvd - Follow Up Meeting I'd like to have the meeting first as items affecting cross sections are changing. Doug Rich Valley Oak Partners, LLC 734 The Alameda l San Jose, CA 95126 T 408.282.0995 I F 408.282.9797 I C 925.570.4593 doug@valleyoakpartners.com l http://www.valleyoakpartners.com On Feb 8, 2017, at 4:02 PM, Bryan Mekechuk <bryan.mekechuk@comcast.net> wrote: OK, I understand that you are considering changes. Can you provide the cross sections requested showing the current grade at the different locations? From: Doug Rich[mailto:doug@valleyoakpartners.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 08, 2017 3:57 PM To: bryan.rnekechuk@comcast.net Cc: Andrew Spyker <awspyker@gmail.com>; Georgina Van Horn <george vh@msn.com>; Shauna Prout Garzee <spgarzeePhotmail.com>; lindalanzl@grnail.com; karenvincent@msn.com; kurtzk@comcast.net; sfrolli n@gmail.com; sinclair.joanne@gmaif.corn; A KUMAR i <ackumarusajgmaii.com>; joannepeth@gmaiil.com; hudponyl@gmail.com; brcarrl0@gmail.com; Jocelyn Puga <ipuga@Iosgatosca.gov> Subject: Re: 15860-15894 Winchester Blvd - Follow Up Meeting We are proposing some changes based on the recommendations/guidance given by the commission and will present at our meeting. We also want to discuss/brainstorm regarding building materials and how to "soften" the architecture as well as discuss any other items (southern AL landscaping, garage wall vs decorative metal panel, etc) Doug Rich Valley Oak Partners, LLC 734 The Alameda I San Jose, CA 95126 T 408.282.0995 I F 408.282.9797 I C 925.570.4593 dougaa valleyoakpartners.com i http://www.vallevoakoartners.com On Feb 8, 2017, at 3:48 PM, Bryan Mekechuk <brvan.mekechuk@comcast.net> wrote: Hi Doug, Thank you for setting up a meeting and sending out the notice. Are you proposing to make any changes to the building you proposed at the January 25 Planning Commission meeting? If you are not proposing to make any changes then please provide the cross sections and elevations (as requested in the attached letter) prior to the meeting. Thank you. Best regards, Bryan From: Doug Rich[mailto:doug@valleyoakpartners.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 08, 2017 3:10 PM To: Andrew Spyker <awspyker@gmail.com>; Georgina Van Horn <george vh@msn.com>; Shauna Prout Garzee <spgarzee@hotmail.com>; Bryan Mekechuk <bryan.mekechuk@comcast.net>; lindalanzl@gmail.com; karenvincentPmsn.com; kurt zk@comcast.net; sfrollin@gmail.com; sinclair.ioanne@gmail.com; A KUMAR <ackumarusa@ gmail.com>; joannepeth@gmail.com; hudponyl@gmail.com; brcarrl0P gmail.com Cc: Jocelyn Puga <ipuga@losg_atosca.gov> Subject: 15860-15894 Winchester Blvd - Follow Up Meeting You are receiving this email as you have expressed interest in participating in discussions regarding the proposed development at 15860-15894 Winchester Blvd. We will be having a meeting on Thursday, February 16th at 7:00pm. Meeting location is as follows: 2 Los Gatos Lodge 50 Los Gatos - Saratoga Road Los Gatos, CA 95032 We will be meeting in the Saratoga Room. If you have any questions ahead of the meeting, don't hesitate to contact me. See you then. Doug Rich Valley Oak Partners, LLC- 734 The Alameda 1 San Jose, CA 95126 T 408.282.0995 1 F 408.282.9797 I C 925.570.4593 doug©valleyoakpartners.com 1 htto://www.vallevoakpartners.com <Letter - 17 01 30 Doug Rich SIGNED.pdf> 3 Jocelyn Puga To: Doug Rich Subject: RE: Thank you From: Doug Rich[mailto:doug@valleyoakpartners.com] Sent: Friday, February 17, 2017 7:38 AM To: Andrew Spyker Cc: Jocelyn Puga; Joel Paulson Subject: Re: Thank you Thanks Andrew. The feeling is mutual. We'll get back to you quickly on the southern end revision. Doug On Feb 16, 2017, at 9:44 PM, Andrew Spyker <awspyker@grnail.com> wrote: Doug, I wanted to make sure I thanked you for the meeting tonight and the work you and your team have done since the planning commission meeting. While we're not there yet, I do think the meeting was productive and I do appreciate some of the changes you have proposed. I look forward to our next meeting that focuses more on the southern elevation. JocelynfJoel, I wanted to make sure you saw this as well to know that we are continuing the discussion. I know that Doug has heard what the neighbors are saying. He also presented very clearly what he considers possible and impossible and we continue to work on options. Andrew Spyker (awspyker r@i,gmail.corn) i Jocelyn Puga To: Subject Andrew Spyker RE: Further information needed to prep for our meeting From: Andrew Spyker [mailto:awspyker@gmail.com] Sent: Sunday, February 26, 2017 11:24 AM To: Doug Rich Cc: Jocelyn Puga; Bryan Mekechuk; Georgina Van Horn; Joel Paulson; Shauna Prout Garzee Subject: Re: Further information needed to prep for our meeting 1 missed this response earlier. You are correct that there is one residential neighborhood remaining. That said, if you zoom out all other neighbors are commercial and a few look like they were likely residential until this was built and then converted to office. We don't want to be forced to think this way after the fact of poor planning. I also doubt this other office complex complied with the spirit of LU 6.3. This said, as I expressed at the planning commission and at our last meeting, the quantitative measure of proximity is percentage of blocked views from our main residence windows. I hope that we see a reductions that impacts the southern elevation. Thanks! On Feb 13, 2017 12:51 PM, "Doug Rich" <doug@valleyoakpartners.com> wrote: Andrew - I'll review your responses below ahead of our Thurs meeting. Just one initial point of clarification to your #6 below - The Palo Alto building does border on residential (see attached pic). North side is single family residential and Palo Alto elected to do the opposite of us - they sited the building against this neighbor (I believe a 10' setback) rather than pushing back. Doug Rich Valley Oak Partners, LLC 734 The Alameda ( San Jose, CA 95126 1 T 408.282.0995 I F 408.282.9797 I C 925.570.4593 doug@valleyoakpartners.com http:/Iwww.valleyoakpartners.com On Feb 13, 2017, at 10:53 AM, Andrew Spyker <awspyker r,gmail.com> wrote: Doug, Thanks for the responses. I have a few more questions on #1, #2, and #3 based on my research of the comparable properties used in the traffic study. We can discuss at the meeting. On #4 and #5, I do have some ideas of at grade parking and tree changes and how to soften the southern exposure that we can discuss at the meeting. Good to hear on #8. I will be interested in your ideas. On #7, it would be good to hear Commissioner Badame's follow-up on this answer given her concern. Could you forward this answer to her as it was different than what was said at the planning meeting? I guess she will receive these mails as part of the 3/22 staff report, but having her understand why this was and wasn't a concern before then might help me understand better. On #6, I hope that your modifications take this into account. The height from the southern elevation is the biggest problem for me personally. I do not believe after looking at the orange netting for a month, regardless of how height is officially measured, that the height is appropriately considering the impact on existing residential neighbors. I will also look at the planning documents for the Palo Alto medical office. If you find an online link to the plans, send them out please. That said, be aware of the following differences between your project and that older project: a) the Palo Alto medical office property does not border residential so its impacts 2 are less severe to immediate neighbors and b) the at grade parking is truly at grade (they didn't build up like you plan to) and c) the planning commission said that the impact of the Palo Alto medical office it "disappointing" (1 don't think they would want to continue to be equivalent to "disappointing"). If you do not plan to lower the height, I see it as critical to provide as much information as possible on the cross sections that document more clearly the height difference with existing grade when viewed from the southern elevation. Thanks! On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 3:57 PM, Doug Rich <doug�7a,valleyoakpartners.com> wrote: Hello Andrew - Thanks for the email. Good questions. Responses below in Red. Doug Rich Valley Oak Partners, LLC 734 The Alameda J San Jose, CA 95126 T 408.282.0995 I F 408.282.9797 j C 925.570.4593 doug@valleyoakcartners.com 1 htto://www.vallevoakoartners.com On Feb 2, 2017, at 12:47 AM, Andrew Spyker <awspyker@gmail.com> wrote: Doug, I was able to review the planning commission meeting this evening. While we need to meet on the areas for improvement noted by the commission based on our earlier comments, there were a few new areas that came up during the meeting that I'd like more information on before we meet. Can you provide information on the following areas? 1. Number of people expected with the current square footage Can you more clearly document what the likely minimum and maximum office professional occupancy will be? Also, will you be able to guarantee these numbers for all potential uses of the office building? This number was very unclear during the meeting with multiple conflicting numbers quoted. In my own research, a quick google search suggests 200 square foot / person with tech in the Bay Area going as low as 125 square foot / person with a national 2017 average of 150 square foot / person. As I mentioned at the hearing, this is dependent on the tenant and I don't have a tenant identified. Typically (with some exceptions), tenants are not interested in engaging with a property owner until a building permit is in hand. This makes sense as facilities management is low on most company's list and they don't want to waste time if its unclear if the space will even be available. With that said, please note the following: I) The 30,070 square feet is the "Gross Area" (entire building area), not just office/cubicle area. In other words, this number includes what I'll call "shared support spaces" or "individual tenant common areas". You will need to remove these areas when performing your calculation. These 3 areas include things such as: i) Lobby/reception, ii) Bathrooms, iii) Conference Rooms. iv) Stairs, v) Hallways/Corridors - typically called "circulation", v) Storage\Closets, vi) Lunch Room/kitchens, vii) copy rooms/work rooms. The accepted metric is that just the circulation component of an office typically runs 35% of a building. Common Areas run from 10 to 20%, So to bring this back to our building, if we assume the midpoint of the common area allocation, you would take the 30,070 square feet. remove 50% of the building for the shared/circulation areas to get to 15,035 square feet. Then if we take the more aggressive number listed above at 125 square foot person, you would get 120 employees in the building. From an actual industry implementation, space planners work the other direction or "bottom up." They'll take: (i) the number of employees they have multiplied by average space per person, (ii) number of conference rooms, work rooms, kitchen, etc multiplied by desire sizes of those buildings, and then (iii) add all that together to get what the industry calls "Net Area or NSF." Then they'll add the circulation factor to that subtotal to get their total footage requirements (this excludes the "Common Area" load factor which office owners will then automatically allocate to each tenant). Side Note: 1 used the terra "shared or common space" above for convenience. The term "common space" is a very defined and narrow term within building management vernacular to mean "areas common to all tenants." These would be things such as elevators, main building lobbies, exit stairs, mechanical rooms and core toilets. If you're online researching, you'll most likely run across the term being used this way and a common space load factor. 2. Number of trips expected per day and at peak hours Can we get a copy of the traffic study used in the planning? I don't believe it has been made available online. Much like the number of people, this was very unclear during the meeting with multiple conflicting numbers quoted. See Jocelyn Puga email on 2/2/17 3. Expectation on needs for overflow parking Combining #2 and #3, I now have concerns of parking beyond the 128 spaces. Can you guarantee that the 128 parking spaces will be sufficient for all potential uses of the office building at 30,000 square foot? As you know we have very limited parking in University Oaks and we wouldn't want new development to take over the limited on street parking that is used for visitors to our neighborhood. See comment to #1 above. Here, you also need to remember working habits/situations of employees. On any given day, you will have employees: i) on vacation, ii) sick, iii) on business trip, and iv) working from home/teIecommuting (becoming more and more common), This also doesn't take into account our TDM measures including transit subsidies, carpooling preference and bike/shower amenities, Of course, we need to recognize there will be visitors, so that will work the other direction. But overall, in addition to the # of employees discussion above is the added factor that not every employee is physically at their place of work on a given day. 4 The Town of Los Gatos has defined parking requirements being met by the project. These requirements have been developed through the use of long -terra observation by industry specialists. In our experience, they work well meeting the parking needs of an office project in this area. 4. Updates on the tree removal Part of the concern we need to resolve is the size of the building as viewed from our southern elevation. Can you confirm that all existing trees between our 706/708 unit and the building will be removed (including the trees that could have buffered our view - #18 which seems to be the largest and healthiest protected tree on the entire property and #34 another protected tree). Commissioner Hudes was asking for the tree schedule to be confirmed and expressed concern on removing trees. Can you confirm that L-2 and C2.0 are accurate as it relates to trees neighboring our property? Trees 31-33 and 37, 38 along the South PL are scheduled for removal (Tree 418 is approx 75' into the property; not sure if you were referring to another tree, but to answer your question #18 is being removed). We are, however, planting 19 new trees along the southern property to address your concern regarding view buffering. I acknowledge that these trees will take time to reach maturity, but 1 do believe that they will achieve the desired goal. If there are specific directions you would like to give regarding locations or tree species, would be glad to discuss with you. We are updating the tree exhibit to remove trees not designated as "Protected Trees" under the Town Ordinance (which consequently weren't included in the arborist's report) which is what created some confusion. 5. More information on the wall and screen During your opening statements, you showed a detailed diagram of the metal screen for another property. In the picture it had a — 4' wall with a screen on top. In the cross section you prepared for us, the screen wasn't on top of a wall (it was directly on top of the continuous curb). Did you mean to suggest by showing this that you would propose the screen on top of a wall? Is this picture of the screen from a property within the bay area? It might be worth us neighbors going to take a look at this screen if there is a similar one nearby. Unfortunately, not aware of a property in Los Gatos vicinity that has one of these screens installed. You are correct - the screen is currently contemplated to go on top of the continuous curb (consistent with the cross section 1 previously provided). However, as mentioned at the hearing, I am willing to replace the screen along the southern edge of the parking with a wall if that is your preference. Let me know how you would like to proceed. 6. More planes for understanding height Chair O'Donnell asked about the slope of the property in relation to the Palo Alto Medical building. We know from living here that Palo Alto drops far quicker than the planned drop of "at grade" parking in the plans. Also, we know that "at grade" of the plans do not match true "at grade" of our neighboring property due to the need for underground parking. Commissioner Hudes noted how the plans are currently unclear on the maximum from existing grade height. Bryan Mekechuk suggested that the current plane shows the best case scenario for the from existing grade height. Can we get a few more planes to truly understand the height from our current existing grade (also asked for by Bryan Mekechuk)? From our elevation it is this 5 height above our existing grade of our property that impacts us the most (regardless of how far set back from Winchester the building is). I believe Joel Paulson (copied here) clarified to Commissioner Hudes the Town's calculation of height and that the project was correctly displaying height measurements per Town code. I need to do a little more research regarding the Palo Alto building. I'll have the civil look at that building prior to our meeting. 7. More information on the stairs Commissioner Badame pointed out safety and fire code issues with the stairs immediately neighboring our property. In response, Chek Tang only responded to the fire code issue and stated, "our stair actually isn't within the 10' separation". A1.0 shows the stairs within the 10' setback. Also, L-1 seems to show the stairs as 4' wide only 5'9" from the property line. Can you help me understand this better? Good question. Here is the clarification: The steps are within the 10' setback. I think the confusion occurred relative to the fire code issue. The steps are not part of the structure and are not enclosed. Hence, there is not a fire -rating they need to achieve. They're simply steps with a handrail down to the door of the underground garage which will be a self-locking door precluding access from outside. They were designed this way to facilitate security. 8. More information on exterior materials Commissioner Burch, at the meeting and the CDAC before, asked if the exterior could decrease the amount of white stucco/glazing. While the focus of this might have been on the front, I note that the southern elevation is almost entirely this material. When Chek Tang said at the meeting that you would consider more warm wooden material usage, was this just for the Winchester elevation or our elevation as well? Combined with better trees on our elevation this may help soften the impact of the height of the wall that all of our homes will face. Good suggestion. Let's discuss at our meeting and we'll kick around some different ideas. I will be getting together soon with the neighbors to prepare to meet with you. If you can answer some of these questions that came up due to the new information at the planning commission meeting, it will help us understand where we currently stand so we can make better suggestions. Thanks! Andrew Spyker (awspyker@gmail.com) 6 Jocelyn Puga From: Cheryl Stuermer <cstuermerl@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, March 06, 2017 9:00 AM To: Jocelyn Puga Subject: Winchester Office Building Question Hi Jocelyn, My children walk to school. They attend both Daves and Fisher schools. 1 have read the documents and did not notice any information of keeping the route to school safe during construction. How will truck traffic be managed during the morning, afternoon and mid -day (early release) hours for the schools? The traffic study took peak traffic times into account, does that include school drop off and pick up or just typical rush traffic times as related to people going or returning to work. Also how will construction traffic be managed during summer peak hours? Traffic on Winchester and Blossom Hill are already being impacted by water main project on Winchester. Will the Winchester project, especially the demolition part, take place during the time University is closed for water main replacement, till end of May? I am mostly looking for reassurance that the route to schools were taken into consideration when evaluating traffic. Thank you for your time. Cheryl Stuermer 76 Mariposa Ave, LG 773-230-9331 1 Jocelyn Pu9a To: Subject Mike Weisz RE: Two questions to help with the Winchester office project From: Jocelyn Puga Sent: Tuesday, March 07, 2017 10:07 AM To: Andrew Spyker Cc: Georgina Van Horn; Shauna Prout Garzee; Suzanne Rollin; doug@valleyoakpartners.com; Mike Weisz Subject: RE: Two questions to help with the Winchester office project Hi Andrew, 1. My apologies, there was an error in our GIS for the zoning of the property. Attached is Ordinance 1939 which amended the zoning from 0 to RM:5-12 in 1993. 2. Per the topo submitted with the plans, it appears that there is a 1-2' elevation differential between the two sides of the wall towards the back of the developer's property. Also, per the same topo, the wall is located entirely within the HOA's property {see attached). Given this, and the concerns provided below, the HOA and developer should coordinate to determine if this is something where a proposed improvement could be agreed upon between the two respective parties. Mike Weisz, with the Engineering Division can look at any suggested diagrams, schematics, sections, or plans available. Please let me know if you have any additional questions. Thank you, Jocelyn Puga • Associate Planner Community Development Department • 110 E Main Street, Los Gatos CA 95030 Ph: 408.354.6875 • ipuga@losgatosca.gov www.loseatosca.Rov • https://www.facebook.com/losgatosca Community Development Counter Hours: 8:00 AM — 1:00 PM, Monday — Friday Please note the upcoming Town closure: May 29— Memorial Day This e-mail is intended only for the use of the individuoi(s) named in this e-mail. if you receive this e-mail and ore not a named recipient any use, dissemination, distribution or copying of the e-mail is strictly prohibited. if you hove received this communication in error, please immediately notify us at the above e-mail address. lot Think Green, please consider th nvironment before printing this e-mail. From: Andrew Spyker [mailto:awspykeragmail.com] Sent: Monday, March 06, 2017 4:20 PM To: Jocelyn Puga Cc: Georgina Van Horn; Shauna Prout Garzee; Joel Paulson; Suzanne Rollin; Doug Rich Subject: RE: Two questions to help with the Winchester office project Thank you! [f us being zoned medium density residential helps can we apply to be rezoned? Also, given university oaks has been there for 30 years, how did we get zoned office? On Mar 6, 2017 4:07 PM, "Jocelyn Puga" <JPugai?losgatosca.gov> wrote: i Hi Andrew, 1. The University Oaks community is zoned 0 (Office) and has a General Plan Land Use designation of Medium Density Residential. 2. I am checking with our Engineering Division regarding your second comment and can back to you this week when I have additional information. Thank you, Jocelyn Puga • Associate Planner Community Development Department • 110 E Main Street, Los Gatos CA 95030 Ph: 408.354.687E • jpvga@Iosgatosca.Rov www.tosgatosca gov • https://www.facebaok.com/Iosgatosca Community Development Counter Hours: 8:00 AM — 1:00 PM, Monday — Friday Please note the upcoming Town closure: May 29 — Memorial Day This e-mail is intended only for the use of the individual(s) named in this e-mail. If you receive this e-mail and are not a named recipient, any use, dissemination, distribution or copying of the email is strictly prohibited. if you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify us at the above a -mail address. k Think Green, please consider the environment before printing this e-mail. From: Andrew Spyker [mailto:awspyker@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, March 06, 2017 10:09 AM To: Joel Paulson; Jocelyn Puga Cc: Doug Rich; Georgina Van Horn; Shauna Prout Garzee; Suzanne Rollin Subject: Two questions to help with the Winchester office project Joel and Jocelyn, Could you help us research two things that have come up in our work with Doug from Valley Oak Partners. 1) Can you help clarify what the zoning is for the University Oaks (706 and 708 Winchester would be two addresses)? In the 2020 General Plan Land Use it shows us as "Multi -Family Residential". In the planning commission meeting Doug mentions that University Oaks and the Park Hillview Apartments are non- conforming suggesting that they are zoned as "Office/professional". At our last neighborhood meeting with Doug, he explained the general plan might be one thing and the current zoning might be another. I have also heard that there might have been multiple change to zoning of our properties. Unfortunately I haven't been around the area long enough to know the history. 2) Can you tell us what options we have regarding the current sound wall between our property and the planned development? Doug thought, due to the zoning, that the current wall on our property needs to remain. At the last University Oaks board meeting (of which I am the president), our owners asked if we could consider options around removing the current wall along with asking the new development to use their planters to replace the wall. As it is today, the current plan calls for a raised parking lot, a wall on the project property, a 10 foot at grade buffer and then our existing sound wall. We want to know what options we might have to replace the existing wall and 10 foot at grade buffer with raised planters that help with south greenery screening 2 more at height of the building elevation acting in place of the current sound wall. We also are concerned that the 10 foot buffer with walls on all sides could have security and safety issues similar to what we've seen at the Palo Alto Medical building. We observed evidence that this has led to homeless encampment there with a similar setup. Doug (and others), if you have any clarifications please add them. Thanks! Andrew Spyker (awspykergglnail.com) 3 This Page Intentionally Left Blank WINCHESTER BLVD. OFFICE - LOS GATOS, CA March 14, 2017 - Submittal r GATES +ASSOC IATES LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE LAND PLANNING • URBAN DESIGN 2671 CROW CANYON ROAD, CALIFORNIA 94583 T 925. 736. 8176 www.dgates.com BkF ENGINEERS SURVEYORS J PLANNERS VALLEY OAK PARTNERS 0 P STUDIO T SQUARE VICINITY MAP: s.G to High scileGl .,- u • r PROPERTY INFORMATION: 15860, 15880, 15894 Winchester Blvd, Los Gatos, CA APN: 529-11-013, -038, -039 and -040 Proposed Land Use: Office PROPOSED LAND USE: Existing GP Designation: Office Professional Existing Land Use: Residential Proposed Land Use: Office Existing Zoning: 0 - Office Gross Acreage: 1.31 Acres PROJECT SUMMARY: SITE AREA: 1.31 ACRE GROSS OFFICE AREA: 30,070 SF LOT COVERAGE: 27.2% (40% MAX) PARKING REQUIRED: 128 (1 STALL / 235 SQ. FT.) PARKING PROVIDED: 128 SUBTERRANEAN PODIUM GARAGE: TYPE IA, S-2 OCCUPANCY OFFICE BUILDING: TYPE IIIB, B OCCUPANCY APPLICABLE CODES: 2013 CA Building Code 2013 CA Electrical Code 2013 CA Mechanical Code 2013 CA Plumbing Code 2013 CA Green Building Standards 2013 CA Energy Efficiency Standards Town of Los Gatos Code of Ordinances PROJECT TEAM: APPLICANT: VALLEY OAK PARTNERS, LLC 734 The Alameda San Jose, CA 95126 Contact: DOUG RICH Phone: 408.282.0995 ARCHITECT/PLANNER: STUDIO T-SQ, INC. 304 12th Street, Suite 2A Oakland, CA 94607 Contact: CHEK TANG / CHRIS LEE Phone: 510.451.2850 STRUCTURAL ENGINEER: SW Structural, Inc. 17582 San Benito Way, Los Gatos, CA 95030 Contact: STEVE F. WADE Phone: 408.399.0623 CIVIL ENGINEER: BKF Engineers 1650 Technology Drive, Suite 650 San Jose, CA 95110 Contact: SCOTT SCHORK Phone: 408.467.9126 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT: GATES + ASSOCIATES 2671 Crow Canyon Road San Ramon, CA 94583 Contact: JANET KIYOI Phone: 925.736.8176 x246 SHEET INDEX: G0.0 SP1.0 SP2.0 SP3.0 SP4.0 C1.0 C2.0 C3.0 C4.0 C5.0 C6.0 L-1 L-2 L-3 L-4 L-5 A1.0 A1.1 A1.2 A1.3 A2.0 A3.0 A4.0 IM1.0 IM1.1 IM1.2 IM2.0 Data Sheet Site Location Site Context General Plan Land Use Shadow Study Diagram Civil Title Sheet Existing Conditions & Tree Removal Plan Preliminary Site Plan Preliminary Grading & Drainage Plan Preliminary Utility Plan Preliminary Stormwater Control Plan Landscape Layout Plan Tree Preservation and Removal Plan Plant List and Plant Palette Site Furnishings Landscape Lighting Building Plan - Subterranean Level Building Plan - Ground Level Building Plan - Second Level Building Roof Plan Site Section Trash Enclosure Elevation & Section Elevations Perspective - View from Winchester Perspective Perspective Materials and Colors STUDIO T SQUARE : Architecture : Planning : Urban Design : 304 12th Street, Suite 2A : Oakland, California 94607 : (510) 451 - 2850 THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS INFORMATION PROPRIETARY TO STUDIO T-SQ, INC. AND IS FURNISHED IN CONFIDENCE FOR THE LIMITED PURPOSE OF EVALUATION OR REVIEW. THIS DOCUMENT OR ITS CONTENTS MAY NOT BE USED FOR ANY OTHER PURPOSE AND MAY NOT BE REPRODUCED OR DISCLOSED TO OTHERS WITHOUT THE PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT OF STUDIO T-SQ., INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED, COPYRIGHT 2010. ey Oak Partners Sheet Title: DATA SHEET Job No. Date: Scale: Drawn By: Sheet No: co 15019 03/14/2017 G0.0 734 The Alameda San Jose, California SANTA CLARA COUNTY LOS GATO.S TOWN CENTER VASONA LAKE COUNTY PARK STUDIO T SQUARE : Architecture : Planning : Urban Design : 304 12th Street, Suite 2A : Oakland, California 94607 : (510) 451 - 2850 THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS INFORMATION PROPRIETARY TO STUDIO T-SQ, INC. AND IS FURNISHED IN CONFIDENCE FOR THE LIMITED PURPOSE OF EVALUATION OR REVIEW. THIS DOCUMENT OR ITS CONTENTS MAY NOT BE USED FOR ANY OTHER PURPOSE AND MAY NOT BE REPRODUCED OR DISCLOSED TO OTHERS WITHOUT THE PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT OF STUDIO T-SQ., INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED, COPYRIGHT 2010. W 7-3 O > m 0 0 U - • ak Partner c3 e Sheet Title: SITE LOCATION Job No. Date: Scale: Drawn By: 15019 03/14/2017 Sheet No: SP1.0 Tree -Lined Winchester Blvd Commercial on Winchester Blvd COMMERCIAL / SFD Exis. ng Site and Frontage DOG & CAT HOSPITAL Adjacent Mul -Family Residential AUTO BODY SHOP ON SHELBURNE Apartments on N Santa Cruz Ave STUDIO T SQUARE : Architecture : Planning : Urban Design : 304 12th Street, Suite 2A : Oakland, California 94607 : (510) 451 - 2850 THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS INFORMATION PROPRIETARY TO STUDIO T-SQ, INC. AND IS FURNISHED IN CONFIDENCE FOR THE LIMITED PURPOSE OF EVALUATION OR REVIEW. THIS DOCUMENT OR ITS CONTENTS MAY NOT BE USED FOR ANY OTHER PURPOSE AND MAY NOT BE REPRODUCED OR DISCLOSED TO OTHERS WITHOUT THE PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT OF STUDIO T-SQ., INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED, COPYRIGHT 2010. W 7-3 0 > m 0 0 U - • ak Partner Co e Sheet Title: SITE CONTEXT Job No. 15019 Date: 03/14/2017 Scale: Drawn By: Sheet No: SP2.0 GENERAL PLAN LAND USE OFFICE PROFESSIONAL ZONE General Plan Land Use Hillside Residential Low Density Residential Medium Density Residential High Density Residential Mixed -Use Commercial Central Business District Neighborhood Commercial Office Professional Light Industrial Public North Forty Specific Plan Overlay STUDIO T SQUARE : Architecture : Planning : Urban Design : 304 12th Street, Suite 2A : Oakland, California 94607 : (510) 451 - 2850 THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS INFORMATION PROPRIETARY TO STUDIO T-SQ, INC. AND IS FURNISHED IN CONFIDENCE FOR THE LIMITED PURPOSE OF EVALUATION OR REVIEW. THIS DOCUMENT OR ITS CONTENTS MAY NOT BE USED FOR ANY OTHER PURPOSE AND MAY NOT BE REPRODUCED OR DISCLOSED TO OTHERS WITHOUT THE PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT OF STUDIO T-SQ., INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED, COPYRIGHT 2010. W 7-3 0 > m 0 0 U Winchester Blvd. and Shelburne Way, Los Gatos, CA ey Oak Partners Co 734 The Alameda San Jose, California Sheet Title: GENERAL PLAN LAND USE Job No. Date: Scale: Drawn By: 15019 03/14/2017 Sheet No: SP3.0 Spring - April 15, at 3:OOPM SCALE: 1/32" = 1' - 0" Autumn - October 15, at 3:OOPM 4 4 SCALE: 1/32" = 1' - 0" Summer - July 15, at 3:OOPM H 1 SCALE: 1/32" = 1' - 0" Winter - January 15, at 3:OOPM SCALE: 1/32" = 1' - 0" STUDIO T SQUARE : Architecture : Planning : Urban Design : 304 12th Street, Suite 2A : Oakland, California 94607 : (510) 451 - 2850 THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS INFORMATION PROPRIETARY TO STUDIO T-SQ, INC. AND IS FURNISHED IN CONFIDENCE FOR THE LIMITED PURPOSE OF EVALUATION OR REVIEW. THIS DOCUMENT OR ITS CONTENTS MAY NOT BE USED FOR ANY OTHER PURPOSE AND MAY NOT BE REPRODUCED OR DISCLOSED TO OTHERS WITHOUT THE PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT OF STUDIO T-SQ., INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED, COPYRIGHT 2010. ey Oak Partners co Sheet Title: SHADOW STUDY DIAGRAM Job No. 15019 Date: 03/14/2017 1/32" = 1'-O" Scale: Drawn By: Sheet No: SP4.0 734 The Alameda San Jose, California 10 Mar 2017 3:22:59pm K: \ENG12\126028\DWG\PLANNING\SHEETS\01 SS—TS1.0.dwg LEGEND PROPERTY LINE LOT LINE STREET CENTERLINE MONUMENT LINE CONTOUR LINE STORM DRAIN LINE SANITARY SEWER LINE WATER LINE ELECTRIC LINE GAS LINE WATER VALVE FIRE HYDRANT CLEAN OUT SIGN ELECTROLIER GAS VALVE FENCE LINE ABBREVIATIONS AC B BB BLDG BW CB CONC COR CY DI EG EP EVAE FC FDC FF FH GS INV LG LS PIEE PIV PS PUE R SF SJWC SD SDCO SDE SDMH SS SSCO SSE SSMH SW TC TYP TW W WM WV ASPHALT CONCRETE BASEMENT SLAB ELEVATION BUBBLER BOX BUILDING BACK OF WALK/BOTTOM OF WALL CATCH BASIN CONCRETE CORNER CUBIC YARD DRAIN INLET ELECTRIC EXISTING GRADE EDGE OF PAVEMENT EMERGENCY VEHICLE ACCESS EASEMENT FACE OF CURB FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION FINISH FLOOR ELEVATION FIRE HYDRANT GARAGE SLAB ELEVATION INVERT ELEVATION LIP OF GUTTER LANDSCAPE PRIVATE INGRESS/EGRESS EASEMENT POST INDICATOR VALVE PARKING STALL PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT RIM SQUARE FEET SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY STORM DRAIN STORM DRAIN CLEANOUT PRIVATE STORM DRAIN EASEMENT STORM DRAIN MANHOLE SANITARY SEWER SANITARY SEWER CLEANOUT PRIVATE SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE SIDEWALK TOP OF CURB TYPICAL TOP OF WALL WATER WATER METER WATER VALVE ARCHITECTURE AND SITE REVIEW WINCHESTER BLVD OFFICE LOS GATOS, SANTA CLARA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA WINCHESTER BLVD • a z UTILITY NOTES WATER SUPPLY: STORM DRAINAGE: SANITARY SEWER: GARBAGE COLLECTION: GAS: ELECTRIC: TELEPHONE: CABLE: Y SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY TOWN OF LOS GATOS WEST VALLEY SANITATION DISTRICT WEST VALLEY COLLECTION (Sc RECYCLING PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC AT&T/VERIZON CALIFORNIA COMCAST Y ff EARTHWORK SUMMARY CUT (C.Y.) FILL (C.Y.) BUILDING/GARAGE 6,600 — DRIVEWAY 20 — LANDSCAPE — — BIORETENTION 400 — *TOTAL 7,020 — *EARTHWORK QUANTITIES ARE SHOWN FOR PLANNING PURPOSES ONLY. CONTRACTOR SHALL PERFORM THEIR OWN EARTHWORK CALCULATION. SHELBURNE WAY VICINITY MAP N.T.S. PROJECT DATA 1. PROJECT ADDRESS: 15860, 15880, 15894 WINCHESTER BLVD., AND SHELBURNE WAY, LOS GATOS, CA 2. ASSESSORS PARCEL NO.: 529-11-013, 038, 039 AND 040 3. EXISTING LAND USE: RESIDENTIAL 4. PROPOSED LAND USE: OFFICE 5. EXISTING ZONING: 0—OFFICE 6. PROPOSED ZONING: 0—OFFICE 7. GROSS ACREAGE: 1.31 ACRES 8. ESTIMATED AREA OF LAND DISTURBANCE: 1.31 ACRES 9. EXISTING NUMBER OF BUILDINGS: 9 RESIDENTIAL/CARPORTS/SHEDS 10. NUMBER OF BUILDINGS REMOVED: 9 11. PROPOSED NUMBER OF HOMES: 0 12. PROPOSED NUMBER OF PARKING SPACE: 128 STALLS 13. FLOOD ZONE: X, FIRM PANEL 376 OF 830, MAP NUMBER 06085C0376H, DATED 05/18/2009. 14. BASIS OF BEARINGS: THE BEARING S8318'46"E OF THE MONUMENT LINE OF THE SHELBURNE WAY, AS SHOWN ON THAT CERTAIN MAP FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE RECORDER OF SANTA CLARA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, IN BOOK "U" OF MAPS AT PAGES 34 AND 35, WAS USED AS THE BASIS OF BEARINGS SHOWN ON THIS MAP. 15. BENCHMARK LG 21: BRASS DISK IN MONUMENT WELL AT EASTERY INTERSECTION OF UNIVERSITY AVENUE AND SHELBURNE WAY. ELEVATION: 351.65 (TOWN OF LOS GATOS DATUM) CIVIL SHEET INDEX SHEET DESCRIPTION C1.0 CIVIL TITLE SHEET C2.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS & TREE REMOVAL PLAN C3.0 PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN C4.0 PRELIMINARY GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN C5.0 PRELIMINARY UTILITY PLAN C6.0 PRELIMINARY STORMWATER CONTROL PLAN 111111111111111111 1111111111111111 11111111111111111111111 isomiu1o11110111 11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 uuuuuuuuuuuuuwWW11111011 I10111,11 uillulllll" IIIIIIplpuul°°IIIIppp11j1j11111 111Vp1j1jj1111111111 1 : Architecture : Planning : Urban Design 1111111111111111111 uu iiiium'p11111pppphVu, THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS INFORMATION PROPRIETARY TO STUDIO T-SQ, INC. AND IS FURNISHED IN CONFIDENCE FOR THE LIMITED PURPOSE OF EVALUATION OR REVIEW. THIS DOCUMENT OR ITS CONTENTS MAY NOT BE USED FOR ANY OTHER PURPOSE AND MAY NOT BE REPRODUCED OR DISCLOSED TO OTHERS WITHOUT THE PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT OF STUDIO T-SQ, INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED, COPY RIGHT 2010. BKF Enemas I SMMVErone ! Pu■N= 1730 N. FIRST STREET SUITE 600 SAN JOSE, CA 95112 408-467-9100 408-467-9199 (FAX) a) U 0 CO a) U Q 0 c cn J co a) c L a) c0 m U) a) o ak Partners a) 734 The Alameda San Jose, California Sheet Title: CIVIL TITLE SHEET BKF Job No. 20126028 Date: 3/13/2017 Scale: Drawn By: PK Sheet No: C1.0 CD 10 Mar 2017 3:59:27pm K: \ENG12\126028\DWG\PLANNING\SHEETS\02SS—EX2.0.dwg X nCA CO 0 out =374.65 0 CO n0 O - W 000 0 W WINCHES ER BLVD D RI VS D co OG7n w 0 O_ O r O 0 CO no) rr n CO 0.0 0 A' 3AS v 00 M • o- - CAn W,C2 CO -IC. nCO m • N CO SUb 4114W ,5SU.UU' M-M DASHED WHITE STRIPE N06'41'14"E 280.00' N06'41'14"E 300.00' -ID � coo X CLESAAH, S06'41'14"W 450.80' Y L(V -, 20 0 10 LEGEND: AC BC BW CB CMP CO CRN DW EC EM EP FCOR FD FF FL FH FW G GC GF GFC GM HCR INV IP JP LG 0/H PC RW R/W SL SSCO SSMH SDMH TBC TC TOB TOE TP TRC TW U/G VCP WV WM - CTV- - E- - G- - SS- - SD- - T- - W- x 0 GRAPHIC SCALE 20 40 ASPHALT CONCRETE BUILDING CORNER BACK OF WALK CATCH BASIN CORRUGATED METAL PIPE CLEAN OUT CROWN DRIVEWAY EDGE OF CONCRETE ELECTRIC METER EDGE OF PAVEMENT FENCE CORNER FOUND FINISHED FLOOR FLOW LINE FIRE HYDRANT FRONT OF WALK GROUND GARAGE CORNER GARAGE FACE/FRONT GROUND AT FENCE GAS METER HANDICAP RAMP INVERT IRON PIPE JOINT POLE LIP OF GUTTER OVERHEAD PROPERTY CORNER RETAINING WALL RIGHT-OF-WAY STREET LIGHT SANITARY SEWER CLEANOUT SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE STORM DRAIN MANHOLE TOP BACK ROLLED CURB TOP OF CURB TOP OF BANK TOE OF BANK TOP OF PAVEMENT TOP OF ROLLED CURB TOP OF WALL UNDERGROUND VITRIFIED CLAY PIPE WATER VALVE WATER METER BOX CABLE TELEVISION LINE ELECTRICAL LINE GAS LINE SANITARY SEWER LINE STORM DRAIN LINE TELEPHONE LINE WATER LINE TREE TO BE REMOVED TREE TO REMAIN 80 ( IN FEET ) 1 inch = 20 ft. 111111111111111111 1111111111111111 11111111111111111111111 lllp 1111111111111,IIIIIIIRIIIIiIIIIIIIiImIVUVIIII 11111111 uu111111111111,1111111il11 ll gIVIVVIum IIIVIIIIIoumimwuil uuuuuuumuuuuuvuWllVlllll ul, IIII 1111111111IIIIuWiI II II 14VI : Architecture : Planning : Urban Design uuu-�I IIII 111 IpIIIIIIb. THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS INFORMATION PROPRIETARY TO STUDIO T-SQ, INC. AND IS FURNISHED IN CONFIDENCE FOR THE LIMITED PURPOSE OF EVALUATION OR REVIEW. THIS DOCUMENT OR ITS CONTENTS MAY NOT BE USED FOR ANY OTHER PURPOSE AND MAY NOT BE REPRODUCED OR DISCLOSED TO OTHERS WITHOUT THE PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT OF STUDIO T-SQ, INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED, COPY RIGHT 2010. BKF Enemas I SUIVEroxs !PLAIN= 1730 N. FIRST STREET SUITE 600 SAN JOSE, CA 95112 408-467-9100 408-467-9199 (FAX) Q 0 g 1 CD (0 U O ■ E L 021 a) ui ^ � , W ZD 2 W m L U 1' U C_ U ak Partners 0 734 The Alameda San Jose, California Sheet Title: EXISTING CONDITIONS & TREE REMOVAL PLAN BKF Job No. Date: Scale: Drawn By: 20126028 3/13/2017 PK Sheet No: C2.0 SELF -RETAINING AREA (3" DEPRESSION) o� 0> m O CI CY = z L1 1— O I— (..) OU)= ozo IQz ND O 1 >-rn (nN- 1 W N z>CL < K: \ENG12\126028\DWG\PLANNING\SHEETS\03SS—SP3.0.dwg 25' SETBACK' I I 1 45' 25.0' SETBACK WINCHESTER BLVD NEW 25' DRIVEWAY 7' - STREET DEDICATION 25' 10' 18' TYP. 8.5' TYP. R3' R=3' 25' TRAVEL WAY 78.0' o� �— Q 10 N. 0 7.1 77.0' 0.7' TYP. 16.2' TYP. 8.5' TYP. UP EX. PL PROPOSED PL S06'41'14"W 330.00' M-M N06'41'14"E 280.00 UP 1 30.6' BASEMENT B tO 0 I_ o r 0) < 17' EXISTING LOT LINES TO BE REMOVED 18.5' 2.0' TYP 9' TYP. (0 > cr z 1 1:7 8' A 0 co cO • Q M N 44.4' 18' 42' 5'11SW MONUMENT LINE STREET CENTERLINE oa)co - U 0 Q co N r 19.2' O 7' STREET DEDICATION OJ qkNy 0 0 0 < co (0r0 13.9' I 36.4' 45' 52' 42' R10' 10' 35.9' 35' SW BIORETENTION BASIN BASEMENT BELO EXISTING LOT LINES TO BE REMOVED SELF -RETAINING AREA (3" DEPRESSION) R37' 5 R=20.00' L=31.42' A=90'00'00" -20.5' - U o� 0 20.5' 5' SW ADA CURB RAMP 14' 13'-' R10' 4' LS - 20' 30' 4.5' LS 5'x18' PLANTER TYP. 25' TRAVEL WAY aD r) 10' 18' TYP. 8.5' 18' TYP. 6' 4.5' N 0 0 N CO U o 0ai 14 - 0NO Y " Y rno 0 • 0 0 Q"' r r ON 0 U r7 N OcNI N p U U 0 o _ o 0 N Q PRAIpN 529- 1 1 _ �7474FAMILY 031 SHELBURNLIVING WA RUST a 613.2' �BIORETENTION� r BASIN N06'41'14"E Y v Y r 300.00' W CC U)� <0 I- 0 z W 12' I . BIORETENTION BASIN Y ', AP FRANDLE E529-11-074 17480 SHELURLIVING TRUST AY 5' SW 25' DRIVEWAY 4' LS 0 0 ui W i0 -00 oo 31' 60' R/W r>- SHELBURNE SO6'41'14"W 450.80' 20 LEGEND PROJECT BOUNDARY LOT LINE ADJACENT LOT LINE STREET CENTERLINE MONUMENT LINE VERTICAL CURB VERTICAL CURB & GUTTER 6' WOOD FENCE W/ LATTICE (SEE LANDSCAPE PLANS) RETAINING WALL (SEE SECTIONS FOR FENCING) CONCRETE PAVING STRUCTURAL SOIL 0 PROPOSED x GRAPHIC SCALE 10 20 40 EXISTING 80 ( IN FEET ) 1 inch = 20 ft. 111111111111111111 uuuuuuuu 11111111111111111111111 11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 II11111111 III Illlllli IIIIIIRIIIImIIIIIumIIiIIpllllll 1 11 �Ilpiuuplmi imuuV l lllllIII2,11241111� 11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 uuuuuuumuuuuuirrr101111 huIIwII IIIIuWII uIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII VI : Architecture : Planning : Urban Design uuuuum 1121lll IIIIIIII l 111 �II1IIIIII2, THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS INFORMATION PROPRIETARY TO STUDIO T-SQ, INC. AND IS FURNISHED IN CONFIDENCE FOR THE LIMITED PURPOSE OF EVALUATION OR REVIEW. THIS DOCUMENT OR ITS CONTENTS MAY NOT BE USED FOR ANY OTHER PURPOSE AND MAY NOT BE REPRODUCED OR DISCLOSED TO OTHERS WITHOUT THE PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT OF STUDIO T-SQ, INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED, COPY RIGHT 2010. BKF Enemas 11 SURVEroxs IPLAIN= 1730 N. FIRST STREET SUITE 600 SAN JOSE, CA 95112 408-467-9100 408-467-9199 (FAX) ak Partners ^^ W 734 The Alameda San Jose, California Sheet Title: PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN BKF Job No. Date: Scale: Drawn By: 20126028 3/13/2017 PK Sheet No: C3.0 10 Mar 2017 K: \ENG12\126028\DWG\PLANNING\SHEETS\04SS—GD4.0.dwg CONFORM (TC 379.7± CONFORM (BW 379.8±) (TW 382.5±) (BW 379.5±) TW 382. BW 377.t `n- vi N TW 381.3t / (BW 374.4±) (TW 380.5±)/ (BW 373.9±) TW 379.9t (BW 373.5± I EXISTING WALL OUTSIDE OF PROPERTY TO REMAIN (TW 379.0±)/ (BW 373.1±) TW 378.3± TW 377.7± BW 372.3± oo N r') x uD N TC 380.30 WINCHESTER BLVD ,20f 03 03 O a) r) PV 380.51„ PV 381.03 x x�1 o 1372.8 N aii sD.D BW 79.5 378.83 x AD 378.80 0) TW 381 (E) SDMH RIM 382.6± 5 BW 3:1.4 JB 381.4 376.0 0 PV s1.57 CI 381.20 379.4 i o1 - U . 0: 00 .. SEE NOTE 380.0 FF 381.5 oo ox co TW 381.2 BW 377.7 PV 381.89 PV 382.36X pans x380.8 34 FF 374.5 BW 371.5 - I 71.ax'S 1 _ -- x ' Q3 TWW 370 / O (TW 376.6t)/` (TW 376.0t (BW 370.6±) Q5 (TW 375.0±) x371 (3699±) +374.50 - --- U369.6t) (BW 367.Ot) \� 3703 Y (// {` AD®_ Y..� ill/ Y Y Y PL EX. �61 • .565q 23' CL 37' 10.1' o(341.7±) AD 380.2 00 N rd r3 PV 38 .1 _ PV 383 44v (380.5±) FF 381.5 (380.1 ±) - e AD x 380.7 380.1 SDCO TC 384.00 ?V 384.28 \ JB 383.90 CORNER SIGHT TRIANGLE OFD 383.40 380.E u 9 .380.8 x 379.•.l 380.8 PV 380.10 N 0D r7 4.5% TC 383.95 TC=FL 383.20 1.8% --- 1.8/ .8% P V. 378.00 379.0 l N PV 373.2 (370.4±r - +374.40 W co 0 70 01 AD 374.00 374.50+ W 0 AD 374.00 1 374.50+ 7 +3 /4. (N) PL 15' 32' (E) PL 374.50+ - 7 (371.4±)x 369.5 0 � 374.50+ 3B 371.00 x371.08 *371.30 M 8 ..SD.co_.. x 371.30 ¥ 370.61 I 0 I �I N l� 1.0% 1.07' 370.1611.8% xf YP 369.5 x369.0 Y Y Y � Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y ^D)5" I _ �6g�� 569� 6)5. OFD 368.8 83 25 TC FL 383,1-1 -- TC-_ 383'6 TC 3-g2.00 PV 371,6 TO 371.29 4.2% 1 I TAT {SDMH_ COIF 1M--369.6t (TB 369.0 CONFORM (BW 369.2±) 190' LEGEND PROJECT BOUNDARY LOT LINE MONUMENT LINE VERTICAL CURB VERTICAL CURB & GUTTER 6' WOOD FENCE W/ LATTICE (SEE LANDSCAPE LANS) RETAINING WALL (SEE SECTIONS FOR FENCING) CONCRETE PAVING STRUCTURAL SOIL NOTES PROPOSED x PUBLIC AC - DEEP LIFT NEW AC PAVEMENT 2" GRIND & OVERLAY BIORETENTION BASIN STORM DRAIN CLEANOUT • SDCO AREA DRAIN 0 AD DRAIN INLET OVERFLOW DRAIN STORM DRAIN MANHOLE BUBBLER BOX OVERLAND RELEASE (E) TREE TO BE PROTECTED 1. SEE LANDSCAPE PLANS FOR LANDSCAPE WALL HEIGHTS AND DECK DETAILS. SAFETY RAILING PARKING SPACE RETAINING WALL VAR 30" TO 45" TALL PL I 4.5' r LS BENCH W/ RAILING L DECK PIERS �: EXISTING OAK TREE TO REMAIN WOOD DECK El DI I=1 OFD OSDMH 0 BB 0 CONCRETE WALKWAY SECTION B HORZ: 1"=10' VERT: 1"=5' PL 10' 1 5.8' EX. PRECAST WALL TO REMAIN EX. BOTTOM OF WALL (BW) EG SECTION C HORZ: 1"=10' VERT: 1"=5' PL EX. PRECAST WALL TO REMAIN EX. BOTTOM OF WALL (BW) 6" 5' 20' SW NEW SIDEWALK -it PER TOWN STD L- STRUCTURAL SOIL 0 L_ EG RETAINING WALL VAR 24" TO 50" TALL 42" TALL MASONRY WALL (SEE LANDSCAPE PLANS) AT -GRADE PARKING BUILDING STAIR WELL 42" TALL MASONRY WALL 10' 1 (SEE LANDSCAPE PLANS) AT -GRADE PARKING CL BUILDING SECTION D HORZ: 1"=10' VERT: 1"=5' VARIES SHELBURNE WAY NEW AC PAVEMENT NEW C&G PER TOWN STD SECTION E HORZ: 1"=10' VERT: 1 "=5' EX. DRIVEWAY f EG 2" GRIND & OVERLAY SIDEWALK I I x W 20 0 GRAPHIC SCALE 10 20 40 EG 0 w X w 5'- WIDENING 2.5' 12" AC DEEPLIFT (5.5' WIDE) NEW C&G PER TOWN STD 80 ( IN FEET ) 1 inch = 20 ft. FC I7' STREET 3' DEDICATION I 45' & VAR 6'1 4' LS NEW SIDEWALK PER TOWN STD 5' SW GROUND LEVEL FF=381.5 7EG BELOW -GRADE GARAGE 1 FF=366.5± 49' 16' PL 1 RAISED PLANTER (SEE LANDSCAPE PLANS) PARKING LOT PLANTER (SEE LANDSCAPE PLANS)\ AT -GRADE GARAGE FF=374.5 3.5' MAX EG PL 2" WOOD LATTICE 6' WOOD FENCE 12" WOOD HEADER EX. RETAINING WALL TO REMAIN EG 111111111111111111 uuuuuuuu 11111111111111111111111 111111111111.011111111111) IVu IIIVVIuuVVRVouuuVIIIIV 111 1111111111111111�� IVuumVl l IIII ,luluummu uuppV VVVmowuuuVuuil 11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 uuuuuuuullllllll@uuuV01111 Illplll��lllllll��lllllll��ll9pll II I V.. IlVuwii,,,,,,,,,,,iiwIVlll dull Vo : Architecture : Planning : Urban Design 1.1.11141111 IIIIIIIII IPIIII III umui �IpIVm, THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS INFORMATION PROPRIETARY TO STUDIO T-SQ, INC. AND IS FURNISHED IN CONFIDENCE FOR THE LIMITED PURPOSE OF EVALUATION OR REVIEW. THIS DOCUMENT OR ITS CONTENTS MAY NOT BE USED FOR ANY OTHER PURPOSE AND MAY NOT BE REPRODUCED OR DISCLOSED TO OTHERS WITHOUT THE PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT OF STUDIO T-SQ, INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED, COPY RIGHT 2010. BKF Enema !Summon Mumma 1730 N. FIRST STREET SUITE 600 SAN JOSE, CA 95112 408-467-9100 408-467-9199 (FAX) ak Partners a) 734 The Alameda San Jose, California Sheet Title: PRELIMINARY GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN BKF Job No. Date: Scale: Drawn By: 20126028 3/13/2017 PK Sheet No: C4.0 SECTION A HORZ: 1"=10' VERT: 1"=5' BELOW -GRADE GARAGE 2 FF=364.0 10 Mar 2017 3:24:06pm K: \ENG12\126028\DWG\PLANNING\SHEETS\05SS—UT5.0.dwg NEW FIRE SERVICE TO BUILDING DN WV HOT TAP TO EX. MAIN PER TOWN STD (E) SDMH RIM 382.6± INV 374.84 IN-E (INV 374.7± 24" IN-N (INV 374.7± 15" IN-E/W (INV 374.6± 24" OUT-S CONNECT NEW 6" SS LATERAL TO EX. MAIN PER TOWN STD NEW FIRE HYDRANT PER TOWN STD AD 378.80 INV 376.30 JB UP 26LF-15" RCP SD S=2.0% CI 381.20 WINCHESTER BLVD INV 375.46 IN INV 375.36 OUT 17LF-12" ,-PVC S=2.0% LEGEND AD 374.05 INV 374.15 A 10.1' BB 27.1' EM EN I 1:3 sn RELOCATE EXIST. ELECT. CABINET I/ --.17-f. 158LF-6" PVC ® S=1.0% Ap 380.2 d16.7 20.5' 8.7' AD 97LF-6" PVC © S=1.0%, 380.1 SD ,,1 SD SD ,_ SDC•O CONNECT TO RO5F LEADERS LOCATION TBD. IN -LINE BACK FLOW DEVICE CONNECT TO SEWER SERVICE AT BUILDING ADJUST EXIST. TELE MANHOLE TO FG RELOCATE EXIST. ELECT. VAULT JB 383.90 INV 377.35 IN 09 OFD 383.40 INV 377.35 IN BASEMENT BELOW EXIST. ELECTROLIER TO REMAIN O1, 10 374.05 374.15 SD s DW JT FW SDMH® DI 0 JB AD BB SDCO• SSMH 'O ssco WM ❑ WV 0 SDCO AD 6" PVC S=1.0% ft Y�x STORM DRAIN LINE (TREATED) STORM DRAIN LINE (UNTREATED) SANITARY SEWER LINE DOMESTIC WATER LINE JOINT TRENCH LINE (DESIGN BY OTHERS) FIRE WATER LINE STORM DRAIN MANHOLE DRAINAGE INLET JUNCTION BOX AREA DRAIN BUBBLER BOX STORM DRAIN CLEANOUT SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE SANITARY SEWER CLEANOUT WATER METER WATER VALVE RPPA FDC x PIV 9 AD 374.00 e'INV 374.15 - SD POINT OF CONNECT! TBD ��.0. .OFDJ a_ NOTES 231LF-6" PVC © S=1.0% AD 374.00 /INV 376.30 QF S CON POINT ECTION TBD NEW IRRIGATION SERVICE NEW DOMESTIC WATER SERVICE TO BUILDING DN J -7.5' REDUCED PRESSURE PRINCIPLE ASSEMBLY 2-WAY FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION POST INDICATOR VALVE DETECTOR CHECK VALVE BY SJWC IN -LINE BACK FLOW DEVICE 1. TRASH ENCLOSURE SHALL BE COVERED. ANY DISCHARGE FROM TRASH ENCLOSURE SHALL BE DIRECTED TO SANITARY SEWER. OFD 368.8 0 INV 365.10 N ,LI J >- w Liu co 1" IRR 4" DW i z_ Q Wo o(I) z I-o ow =n. wv W SDMH RIM 369.6± INV 364.46 IN INV 358.12 OUT MATCHLINE: SEE RIGHT THIS SHEET 20 0 GRAPHIC SCALE 10 20 40 80 ( IN FEET ) 1 inch = 20 ft. MATCHLINE: SEE LEFT THIS SHEET W RPPA 4" DW OFD 368.8 INV 365.10 I 00'6i7C ANI 21 LF-12" PVC S=2.0% Z0'C=S ® OAd „Z l-11 OOF Z0'C=S ® OAd „Zl-51 00C (AT fV co H- W -e- SDMH RIM 369.6± INV 364.46 IN INV 358.12 OUT SHELBURNE 111111111111111111 1111111111111111 11111111111111111111111 111111111111.0111111111111110 llili iplllu IIIIIIIRIIImuuuuouullllllllll 11 IIII I�� I�II�I ,luluummu 111111111111l lllllllllmou„umwliil 11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 I l l l l l l l l l l l l l l,,,,, l l l l l l l l u w w 0111 Iuum PL hullw iILI ulllllllllllllllll IIIIIIII VI : Architecture : Planning : Urban Design uu .111umlll IIIIIIIII IPIIIII III uu°u�IIpIIIIIIVm,. THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS INFORMATION PROPRIETARY TO STUDIO T-SQ, INC. AND IS FURNISHED IN CONFIDENCE FOR THE LIMITED PURPOSE OF EVALUATION OR REVIEW. THIS DOCUMENT OR ITS CONTENTS MAY NOT BE USED FOR ANY OTHER PURPOSE AND MAY NOT BE REPRODUCED OR DISCLOSED TO OTHERS WITHOUT THE PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT OF STUDIO T-SQ, INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED, COPY RIGHT 2010. BKF Enemas I SUIVEroxs !PLAIN= 1730 N. FIRST STREET SUITE 600 SAN JOSE, CA 95112 408-467-9100 408-467-9199 (FAX) Q 0 co O c cn J (0 N c a) 'r c0 m U) U) a U ak Partners W 734 The Alameda San Jose, California Sheet Title: PRELIMINARY UTILITY PLAN BKF Job No. Date: Scale: Drawn By: 20126028 3/13/2017 PK Sheet No: C5.0 WINCHESTER BLVD Q r') CN 0 CV 0 0 K: \ENG12\126028\DWG\PLANNING\SHEETS\06SS—SW6.0.dwg EXISTING WALL OUTSIDE OF PROPERTY TO REMAIN SEE NOTE 4 TYP. TOP OF BIORETENTION BASIN DROP INLET DEPTH VARIES, SEE GRADING PLAN \ 1" MIN 18" TREATMENT SOIL- INFILTRATION RATE 5 TO 10 IN/HR (SEE NOTE 1) 12" MIN' SEE NOTE 5 COMPACTED AND SCARIFIED NATIVE OR IMPORTED FILL STORM DRAIN PIPE r a � SECTION VIEW (NTs) BIORETENTION BASIN CAT GRADE) CURB CUT 24" CONC. APRON { 3" M 2"-4" COBBLE STONES ENERGY DISSIPATOR 40 MIL NON -PERMEABLE LINER 4" PERFORATED PIPE TO SLOPE AT 0.5X MIN. SEE UTILITY PLAN FOR LOCATION OF PIPE. SEE NOTE 4 TYP. TOP PLA COMPACTED AND SCARIFIED NATIVE OR IMPORTED FILL SOIL NTING MIX , 1" MIN. DROP INLET 6" TOP OF BIORETENTION BASIN DEPTH VARIES, SEE PLAN alo . ,di, A, alr, ali, 4Io dr, al 18 TREATMENT SOIL- - INPU.11AI1ON RATE 5: TO 1O:!VHF : (SEE : NOTE. 1} :.' ._.::. LA) STORM DRAIN PIPE ELEVATION VIEW (NTs) NOTE: 1. FOR TREATMENT SOIL SPECIFICATION, SEE APPENDIX C IN SCVURPPP C3 STORMWATER HANDBOOK DATED APRIL 2012. 2. BACKFILL BIORETENTION ONLY WITH PERMEABLE PLANTING MATERIAL AND DRAIN ROCK AS SPECIFIED IN THIS DETAIL. ABSOLUTELY NO NATIVE MATERIAL SHALL BE USED FOR BACKFILL. CONTRACTOR MUST COORDINATE WITH CIVIL ENGINEER PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 3. CONTACT THE CITY'S URBAN RUNOFF COORDINATOR FOR INSPECTION DURING INSTALLATION OF BIOTREATMENT SOIL, OF THE TREE POD SYSTEM, AND FINAL LANDSCAPING. RESULT FROM A PERCOLATION RATE SHALL BE GREATER THAN 5.0 IN/HR AND LESS THAN 10.0 IN/HR. 4. A MINIMUM 2-FOOT LEVEL CLEARANCE (MAX 2%) SHALL BE PROVIDE BETWEEN THE TOP OF BASIN AND WALKWAYS/PUBLIC SIDEWALKS. 5. DRAIN ROCK TO BE CLASS 2 PERMEABLE MATERIAL PER CALTRANS STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS, SECTION 68-2.02F. STORM DRAIN CLEANOUT 4" PERFORATED PIPE TO SLOPE 0 0.5% MIN. AND PLACED ON TOP OF LINER. SEE UTILITY PLAN FOR LOCATION OF PIPE. 40 MIL NON -PERMEABLE LINER BASEMENT BELO SHELBURNE LEGEND A-X 11 BR-t SR-# SELF -RETAINING AREA OVERFLOW DRAIN 3" SELF -RETAINING AREA (NTS) TABLE A DRAINAGE AREA BOUNDARY RETENTION AREA DESIGNATION SELF -RETAINING AREA DIRECTION OF FLOW alt, 411, di, PERVIOUS AND IMPERVIOUS SURFACES COMPARISON TABLE PROJECT PHASE NUMBER (N/A, 1, 2, 3, ETC): 1 TOTAL SITE (ACRES): 1.29 TOTAL AREA OF SITE DISTURBED (ACRES): 1.29 IMPERVIOUS SURFACES EXISTING CONDITION OF SITE AREA DISTURBED (SQUARE FEET) PROPOSED CONDITION OF SITE AREA DISTURBED (SQUARE FEET) REPLACED NEW ROOF AREA(S) 7,770 7,770 8,080 PARKING 1,444 1,444 5,696 SIDEWALKS, PODIUM, PATHS, ETC. 8,076 559 0 STREETS (PUBLIC) 0 0 0 STREETS (PRIVATE) 0 0 9,210 TOTAL IMPERVIOUS SURFACES: 17,290 9,773 22,986 PERVIOUS SURFACES LANDSCAPE AREA 38,990 23,689 0 PERVIOUS PAVING 0 0 0 OTHER PERVIOUS SURFACES (GREEN ROOF, ETC) 0 0 0 TOTAL PERVIOUS SURFACES: 38,990 23,689 0 TOTAL PROPOSED REPLACED + NEW IMPERVIOUS SURFACES: 32,759 TOTAL PROPOSED REPLACED + NEW PERVIOUS SURFACES: 23,689 TREATMENT CONTROL MEASURE SUMMARY DRAINAGE AREAS DRAINAGE AREA SIZE (SQ. FT.) PERVIOUS SURFACE (SQ. FT.) TYPE OF PERVIOUS SURFACE IMPERVIOUS SURFACE (SQ. FT.) IMPERVIOUS SURFACE TYPE (SQ. FT.) TREATMENT REQUIRED (SQ. FT.) TREATMENT PROVIDED (SQ. FT.) PROPOSED TREATMENT CONTROLS CONFORMS TO SIZE STANDARD? (ROOF 0 90) (C 0.80) (C 0.70) A-1 17,214 10,354 LANDSCAPE (C=0.10) 6,860 6,860 0 0 274 400 BIORETENTION YES A-2 1,466 0 LANDSCAPE (C=0.10) 1,466 1,466 0 0 59 125 BIORETENTION YES A-3 29,836 10,530 LANDSCAPE (C=0.10) 19,306 7,360 11,946 0 772 800 BIORETENTION YES A-4 3,990 866 LANDSCAPE (C=0.10) 3,124 0 3,124 0 125 190 BIORETENTION YES SR-1 888 776 LANDSCAPE (C=0.10) 112 0 112 0 56 56 SELF -RETAINING YES SR-2 1,423 1,275 LANDSCAPE (C=0.10) 200 0 144 0 100 100 SELF -RETAINING YES 20 0 10 GRAPHIC SCALE 20 40 80 ( IN FEET ) 1 inch = 20 ft. 111111111111111111 uuuuuuuu 11111111111111111111111 111111111111.01111111111111101111 Iglu Illlllluiiimuuuummupllllll 1111111111111111 mu uluilll 41111luluu, 111111111111t 11 IIIVIIIuoumimwuil 11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 uuuuuuuulllllll1WluWW10ll ul, hIIIj ��eli[11V mpVpIIIII1IIIIIIII1111IIIIIIII1IIIIII l„ : Architecture : Planning : Urban Design uu .111urylll uu°u IIIIIIIII IPIIIII III �IIpIIIIII61, THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS INFORMATION PROPRIETARY TO STUDIO T-SQ, INC. AND IS FURNISHED IN CONFIDENCE FOR THE LIMITED PURPOSE OF EVALUATION OR REVIEW. THIS DOCUMENT OR ITS CONTENTS MAY NOT BE USED FOR ANY OTHER PURPOSE AND MAY NOT BE REPRODUCED OR DISCLOSED TO OTHERS WITHOUT THE PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT OF STUDIO T-SQ, INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED, COPY RIGHT 2010. BKF Ewen 1 SUIVFMRS IPu■■esa 1730 N. FIRST STREET SUITE 600 SAN JOSE, CA 95112 408-467-9100 408-467-9199 (FAX) Q U co. o (0 v7 O J (0 a) c L S2 4) (0 m 0) U) a) o ak Partners 734 The Alameda San Jose, California Sheet Title: PRELIMINARY STORMWATER CONTROL PLAN BKF Job No. Date: Scale: Drawn By: 20126028 3/13/2017 PK Sheet No: C6.0 WINCHESTER BOULEVARD CONCRETE PAVING PATTERN AT PARKING LOT ENTRY ACCENT TREES AT ENTRIES, TYP. SCREEN TREES AND PLANTING BETWEEN PARKING AND PROPERTY LINE, TYP. 42" HIGH MASONRY WALL ON PARKING STRUCTURE ACCENT TREES IN PARKING LOT PLANTERS %< o i [V • 29 6' HIGH REDWOOD FENCE AT EAST PROPERTY LINE 18" HIGH CORTEN PLANTER WALL TW4'TYP. TW 18" TYP. TW 18" TYP. TW 4' TYP. TOP OF PLANTER WALLS 18" FROM FINISHED GRADE, LEVEL, TYP. 00000000"SI X X 1 Xc EXISTING TREE TO REMAIN, TYP. SEE TREE PROTECTION DETAIL ON L-4 RETAINING WALL, SEE CIVIL DRAWINGS BOLLARD LIGHT, TYP. ACCENT TREES AT ENTRY SEATWALLS TOP OF WALL 18" FROM FINISHED GRADE, TYP. DARK COLORED CONCRETE, TYP. TABLES AND CHAIRS, TYP. LIGHT COLORED CONCRETE, TYP. REDWOOD DECK AND PATIO SEATING AREA , SEE L-4 FOR SECTION A -A' BUILT-IN REDWOOD BENCH AT DECK WITH CABLE RAILING, SEE IMAGES, L-4 TRAILING SHRUBS AT CORTEN PLANTER WALL 5' HIGH CORTEN PLANTER WALL X 1 X/X X TW 18" TYP TW 5'-0" FROM FG OF SURFACE PARKING LOT PARKING LOT PLANTER, SEE L-4 FOR SECTION B-B' SHADE TREES TO MATCH EXISTING EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN, SEE TREE PROTECTION DETAIL L-4 FOR ALL LANDSCAPE ELEVATIONS, BOTTOM OF WALL IS FINISHED GRADE OR FROM THE SURFACE OF THE PARKING LOT. *SEE L-2 FOR TREES TO PRESERVE AND REMOVE *SEE L-3 FOR PLANTING LIST AND LEGEND *SEE L-4 FOR SITE FURNISHINGS *SEE L-5 FOR LANDSCAPE LIGHTING NATURAL MULCH KEPT UNDER EXISTING TREES, TYP. PARKWAY PLANTING STREET TREE NATURAL MULCH KEPT UNDER EXISTING TREES, TYP. SCREEN PLANTING ON PARKING EDGE 42" HIGH MASONRY WALL ON PARKING STRUCTURE 114•311 ENCLOSURE PEDESTRIAN CONCRETE PAVING PROPERTY LINE `42" HIGH CABLE 1AILING EXISTING TREES TO RE{4AIN, TYP. SEE DET) STEP IL L-4 D CORTEN PLANTEI WALLS A HIGH. SE IMAGE PANEL WALL, PROX. 2'-4" L-4 FOR TIVE CORTEN PEDESTRIAN RETE PAVING, P. 42" HIGH CABLE RAILING TRELLIS, SEE ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS SCREEN PLANTING BETWEEN TRASH PATH AND PEDESTRIAN PATH ACCENT TREE AT GARAGE ENTRY VINES ON TRASH HOLDING AREA, TYP. SCREEN PLANTING IN BIORETENTION BIORETENTION, TYP SEE CIVIL DRAWINGS 0 10' 20' 40' STUDIO T SQUARE : Architecture : Planning : Urban Design : 304 12th Street, Suite 2A : Oakland, California 94607 : (510) 451 - 2850 THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS INFORMATION PROPRIETARY TO STUDIO T-SQ, INC. AND IS FURNISHED IN CONFIDENCE FOR THE LIMITED PURPOSE OF EVALUATION OR REVIEW. THIS DOCUMENT OR ITS CONTENTS MAY NOT BE USED FOR ANY OTHER PURPOSE AND MAY NOT BE REPRODUCED OR DISCLOSED TO OTHERS WITHOUT THE PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT OF STUDIO T-SQ., INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED, COPYRIGHT 2010. a) U O co W 0 a) U Winchester Blvd. and Shelburne Way, Los Gatos, CA GATES +ASSOCIATES LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE LAND PLANNING • URBAN DESIGN 2671 CROW CANYON ROAD. CALIFORNIA 94583 T 925.736.8176 www.dgates. corn 3- 0 a) co 734 The Alameda San Jose, California Sheet Title: LANDSCAPE LAYOUT PLAN Job No. Date: Scale: Drawn By: P4724 03/14/2017 1"=20 JK Sheet Nc L- I SG E3L42= I IVM dOl WINCi-IESTER BOULEVARD O O id szt 8n ,. 3> 9 m 0 x 0 -I Z 0 D w r CO 0 II N 00 CA Z 0 _1 O J D ©� IN 00 7-0 0 D r w - J I co J co 0 89'LLS=11VM dOl 0 T7 z 0 © D w 01 co 0) 0 I� co �A 4o • 30 cv 00 CO 000f Z -0 O • D > II CAI— J II wc0 rn- CO LEGEND —I CA —I CA O J _0W mN \C��J x O O D O 0< -0m 0m Am 0 TREE TO BE REMOVED, TYP. 0 z ©� 32 \ • 29 28 27 > 0 -I 0 00 0 Z ©o D D D II r^� * II r w -3 0) II w 01C 0 382 85 .381 6> Coo 0 m 24 EXISTING TREE TO REMAIN TREE TO BE REMOVED TREE TO REMAIN, TYP. oco nap Co Oc0 0 r w0 J N 0 �0 • • 23 22 DO -AI 0 00 0 ZO �S� s � © D 0>r II (-^1 m r 0) r ^ CO II r w-3 P II w NJ (3) co 0 00 3> 9 CDC (n -nu, me 0 00 ON w n LA o w m O C-1 0 J O -N O 0 0 N 0 O 0 2 0 00 nu' O� 20 \ X42 3> r 383 >9 383.38 8338 0 4, C N -1 3 '?6 0 140 384.9 83 73 84 28 6 6' WD FNC 3> 7 9J 6`3+ 4 3) • S7 7 0 0 0c,4 C H P1 m +3> s7s\2 7 3j A' O +3> `33 9 3j • 77 > YELLOW SOLID STRIPE 383 YELLOW SOLID STRIPE DASHED WHITE STRIPE D r w 0) CO n0 r m 827387 • SO N N �-P r c,., 0 1 -I C,4 co 000 - \W m m0 Z (7co 6' WIRE FNC 3> 7• 7 S w 00 r -o 6)6 O 0 0 0 +3 6S '>> EOP k 3) `. 0 9 m0 >o �z 700 m 00 8' CLF 0 Z 0 © 15 D r r w 01 J co D r w CO 0 w o 0 1— J 0 0 0 0 0 0 11VM ONO 0 00 > oz O 0 Z 0 © D w 0) -P 381. 84 88 384' s9 3I w O 0 3> S3 < II U' II cA Co CA 0 CA CA Co co 0 m-0=t5z m -0000 O m II c—z CA -1Z X z• C9 0 T368 + �> c 30.00' •>> 3j 6 6� • 6 2 0 10' 20' x° n0 cn \N -n• m 40' TREE INVENTORY TREE NO. COMMON NAME BOTANICAL NAME TRUNK DIAMETER PRESERVATION SUITABILITY ACTION REASON FOR REMOVAL ICoast Live Oak Quercus agrifolia 20 Good Removed Construction 2 Coast Live Oak Quercus agrifolia 15,15,23 Fair/Good Saved 3 Coast Live Oak Quercus agrifolia 19,23 Fair/Good Saved 5 London Plane Tree Platanus x acerifolia 7 Fair/Poor Removed Construction 7 London Plane Tree Platanus x acerifolia 6 Fair/Poor Removed Construction 8 Coast Live Oak Quercus agrifolia 6 Fair Saved Construction 9 Coast Live Oak Quercus agrifolia 30 (3) Good Saved I0 California Bay Laurel Umbellularia californica 5,6,7 Fair Removed Construction II Coast Live Oak Quercus agrifolia 7,9 Fair Removed Construction 12 Coast Live Oak Quercus agrifolia 25 Good Removed Construction 13 Coast Live Oak Quercus agrifolia 7 Fair/Good Removed Construction 14 London Plane Tree Platanus x acerifolia 7 Fair/Poor Removed Construction 15 London Plane Tree Platanus x acerifolia 6 Fair/Poor Removed Construction 16 Coast Live Oak Quercus agrifolia 25 Good Saved 17 Coast Live Oak Quercus agrifolia 21 Good Saved 18 Coast Live Oak Quercus agrifolia 28 Good Removed Construction 19 Weeping bottlebrush Callistemon viminalis 7 Fair Removed Construction 20 Coast Live Oak Quercus agrifolia 6 Fair/Poor Removed Construction 21 Coast Live Oak Quercus agrifolia 1 1,13,18 Fair/Good Removed Construction 22 Coast Live Oak Quercus agrifolia 13 Fair Saved 23 Coast Live Oak Quercus agrifolia 15 Fair/Good Saved 24 Coast Live Oak Quercus agrifolia 15,16 Fair/Good Removed Construction 25 Coast Live Oak Quercus agrifolia 17 Fair/Good Removed Construction 27 Coast Live Oak Quercus agrifolia 18 Fair Saved 29 Coast Live Oak Quercus agrifolia 7 Fair Saved 34 Coast Live Oak Quercus agrifolia 17 Good Removed Construction 35 California Black Walnut Juglans californica 23(3.5) Poor Removed Construction/Structure 36 California Black Walnut Juglans californica 19(3.5) Poor/Unacceptable Removed Construction/Structure 38 Golden Rain Tree Koelreuteria paniculata 19(4) Fair/Good Removed Construction 39 Coast Live Oak Quercus agrifolia 26 Good Removed Construction 40 Valley Oak Quercus Iobata 16 Good Removed Construction 41 Coast Live Oak Quercus agrifolia 25 Good Saved 42 Coast Live Oak Quercus agrifolia 23 Good Removed Construction 43 Coast Live Oak Quercus agrifolia 12 Fair/Poor Removed Construction STUDIO T SQUARE • Architecture : Planning : Urban Design : 304 12th Street, Suite 2A : Oakland, California 94607 : (510) 451 - 2850 THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS INFORMATION PROPRIETARY TO STUDIO T-SQ, INC. AND IS FURNISHED IN CONFIDENCE FOR THE LIMITED PURPOSE OF EVALUATION OR REVIEW. THIS DOCUMENT OR ITS CONTENTS MAY NOT BE USED FOR ANY OTHER PURPOSE AND MAY NOT BE REPRODUCED OR DISCLOSED TO OTHERS WITHOUT THE PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT OF STUDIO T-SQ., INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED, COPYRIGHT 2010. W ) O Winchester Blvd. and Shelburne Way, Los Gatos, CA GATES +ASSOCIATES LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE LAND PLANNING • URBAN DESIGN 2671 CROW CANYON ROAD. CALIFORNIA 94583 T 925.736.3176 www.dgates.com ey Oak Partners 734 The Alameda San Jose, California Sheet Titie.. TREE PRESERVATION AND REMOVAL PLAN Job No. Date: Scale: Drawn By: P4724 03/14/2017 JK Sheet No: L-2 * SHADED CELLS ARE TREES THAT ARE LESS THAN PROTECTED SIZE PLANT SCHEDULE O ACCENT TREE CERCIS OCCIDENTALIS LAGERSTROEMIA X ' MUSKOGEE' OLEA EUROPAEA ' WILSONII' SCREEN TREES CARPINUS BETULUS ' FASTIGIATA' JUNIPERUS SCOPULORUM ' BLUE ARROW' PODOCARPUS GRACILIOR SHADE TREE ARBUTUS X ' MARINA' QUERCUS AGRIFOLIA STREET TREES PLATANUS X ACERIFOLIA SHRUBS AGAVE ATTENUATA ' NOVA' AGAVE X ' BLUE GLOW' ALOE X ' BLUE ELF' ANIGOZANTHOS X ' BUSH GOLD' CAREX OSHIMENSIS ' EVERILLO' COLEONEMA PULCHRUM DIANELLA CAERULEA 'CLARITY BLUE' DIETES VEGETA EUONYMUS FORTUNEI ' KEWENSIS' HAKONECHLOA MACRA 'AUREOLA' HELICTOTRICHON SEMPERVIRENS LAVATERA MARITIMA LEYMUS CONDENSATUS 'CANYON PRINCE' LOMANDRA LONGIFOLIA ' NYALLA' LOROPETALUM CHINENSE 'CAROLINA MIDNIGHT' LOROPETALUM CHINENSE 'SUZANNE' MAHONIA EURYBRACTEATA 'SOFT CARESS' MAHONIA REPENS NEPETA X FAASSENII 'WALKERS LOW' PENNISETUM ALOPECUROIDES 'HAMELN' PENSTEMON HETEROPHYLLUS ' MARGARITA BOP' SALVIA CLEVELAND! SALVIA MICROPHYLLA ' HOT LIPS' SENECIO MANDRALISCAE TEUCRIUM CHAMAEDRYS TEUCRIUM FRUTICANS 'AZUREUM' BIORETENTION PLANTING CAREX TUMULICOLA CHONDROPETALUM TECTORUM ' EL CAMPO' DESCHAMPSIA CESPITOSA JUNCUS PATENS SCREEN PLANTING DODONAEA VISCOSA VINE/ESPALIER GELSEMIUM SEMPERVIRENS LONICERA JAPONICA COMMON NAME CONT WATER USE WESTERN REDBUD 24"BOX L LAVENDER CRAPE MYRTLE MULTI -TRUNK 24"BOX L WILSON OLIVE 24"BOX L COMMON NAME PYRAMIDAL EUROPEAN HORNBEAN BLUE ARROW JUNIPER FERN PINE COMMON NAME ARBUTUS STANDARD COAST LIVE OAK CONT WATER USE 24"BOX M 24"BOX L 24"BOX L CONT WATER USE 24"BOX L 24"BOX L COMMON NAME CONT WATER USE LONDON PLANE TREE 24"BOX M COMMON NAME BLUE CLONE BLUE GLOW AGAVE ALOE KANGAROO PAW EVERILLO JAPANESE SEDGE PINK BREATH OF HEAVEN DIANELLA AFRICAN IRIS KEW EUNONYMUS GOLDEN VARIEGATED HAKONECHLOA BLUE OAT GRASS TREE MALLLOW NATIVE BLUE RYE NYALLA BREEZE GRASS CAROLINA MIDNIGHT LOROPETALUM SUZANNE FRINGE FLOWER MAHONIA SOFT CARESS CREEPING MAHONIA WALKERS LOW CATMINT HAMELN DWARF FOUNTAIN GRASS BEARD TONGUE CLEVELAND SAGE BABY SAGE BLUE FINGER GERMANDER AZURE BUSH GERMANDER COMMON NAME BERKELEY SEDGE CAPE RUSH TUFTED HAIR GRASS CALIFORNIA GRAY RUSH COMMON NAME HOPSEED BUSH COMMON NAME JESSAMINE ESPALIER JAPANESE HONEYSUCKLE NATURAL MULCH AND LEAF LITTER UNDER EXISTING OAKS WATER USE RATING LEGEND: WUCOLS III CATEGORIES OF WATER NEEDS FROM: UNIVERSITY OF CALIF COOPERATIVE EXTENSION, CALIF DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES, U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION H = HIGH M = MODERATE L = LOW VL = VERY LOW TREES SIZE 5 GAL 5 GAL 5 GAL 5 GAL 5 GAL 5 GAL 5 GAL 5 GAL 5 GAL 5 GAL 5 GAL 5 GAL 5 GAL 5 GAL 5 GAL 5 GAL 5 GAL 5 GAL 5 GAL 5 GAL 5 GAL 5 GAL 5 GAL I GAL 5 GAL 5 GAL SIZE 5 GAL 5 GAL 5 GAL 5 GAL WATER USE SPACING L 72" o.c. L 24" o.c. L 18" o.c. L 24" o.c. M 18" o.c. M 48" o.c. M 24" o.c. L 42" o.c. M 24" o.c. M 18" o.c. L 24" o.c. L 60" o.c. L 36" o.c. L 36" o.c. L 60" o.c. L 42" o.c. M 36" o.c. M 36" o.c. L 30" o.c. L 24" o.c. L 36" o.c. L 48" o.c. L 36" o.c. L 288" o.c. L 36" o.c. L 36" o.c. WATER USE L L L L SPACING 18" O.G. 36" o.c. 18" o.c. 24" o.c. SIZE WATER USE SPACING 5 GAL L 72" o.c. SIZE 5 GAL 5 GAL WATER USE SPACING L 12" o.c. M 48" o.c. WATER CONSERVATION STATEMENT THE PLANT LIST IS PRELIMINARY IN NATURE. SPECIES SHALL BE ADDED AND SUBTRACTED TO FULFILL THE DESIGN AND HORTICULTURAL REQUIREMENTS AS NECESSARY. 2. THE IRRIGATION SYSTEM SHALL BE DESIGNED WITH WATER CONSERVATION IN MIND WHILE ACHIEVING THE GOAL OF EFFECTIVELY AND EFFICIENTLY PROVIDING THE LANDSCAPE WITH WATER BY MEANS OF SPRAY IRRIGATION TO THE SHRUBS/GROUNDCOVER AREAS AND BUBBLERS TO THE TREES. 3. THE SPRAY SYSTEM SHALL BE TORO SPRAY HEADS WITH PRESSURE COMPENSATING NOZZLES IN A HEAD TO HEAD LAYOUT TO ACHIEVE AN EVEN LEVEL OF PRECIPITATION THROUGHOUT THE IRRIGATION SYSTEM. 4. A STATE-OF-THE-ART IRRIGATION CONTROLLER SHALL BE SPECIFIED FOR THIS PROJECT TO CONTROL THE WATER ALLOCATED TO EACH VALVE GROUPED PER INDIVIDUAL HYDROZONE (BASED ON PLANT TYPE AND EXPOSURE). Arbutus x marina Strawberry Tree Podocarpus gracilior Fern Pine Carpinus betulus 'Fastigiata' Cercis occidentalis European Hornbeam Western Redbud Oleo europaea wilsonii Fruitless Olive Quercus agrifolia Coast Live Oak Lagerstroemia 'Muskogee' Crape Myrtle Juniperus scopulorum 'Blue Arrow' Blue Mountain Juniper Platanus acerifolia London Plane Tree SHRUBS, GRASSES, GROUNDCOVERS Agave attenuata Fox Tail Agave Dianella 'Clarity' Dianella Leymus condensatus Canyon Prince Wildrye Pennisetum alopecuroides 'Hameln' Dwarf Fountain Grass VINES Agave 'Blue Glow' Blue Glow Agave Dietes vegeta Fortnight Lily Lomandra longi folia 'Nyalla' Mat Rush Salvia clevelandii Cleveland Sage Gelsemium sempervirens Carolina Jasmine Aloe 'Blue Elf Aloe Euonymus fortunei 'Kewensis' Wintercreeper Loropetalum chinensis Fringe Flower Senecio mandraliscae Blue Fingers Anigozanthos Kangaroo Paw Hakone 'Aureola' Japanese Forest Grass Mahonia repens Creeping Mahonia Teucrium chamaedrys Wall Germander SCREEN PLANTING Lonicera j. 'Aureoreticulata' Dodonaea viscosa Honeysuckle Hopseed BIORETENTION PLANTING Chondropetalum techtorum Cape Rush Carex tumulicola Carex tumulicola Deschampsia cespitosa Pacific Hairgrass Juncus patens California Gray Rush Carex o. 'Everillo' Japanese Sedge Helictotrichon sempervirens Cape Rush Mahonia 'Caress' Dwarf Mahonia Teucrium fruticans Bush Germander Coleonema pulchrum Breath of Heaven Lavatera Tree Mallow Nepeta spp. Catmint STUDIO T SQUARE : Architecture : Planning : Urban Design : 304 12th Street, Suite 2A : Oakland, California 94607 : (510) 451 - 2850 THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS INFORMATION PROPRIETARY TO STUDIO T-SQ, INC. AND IS FURNISHED IN CONFIDENCE FOR THE LIMITED PURPOSE OF EVALUATION OR REVIEW. THIS DOCUMENT OR ITS CONTENTS MAY NOT BE USED FOR ANY OTHER PURPOSE AND MAY NOT BE REPRODUCED OR DISCLOSED TO OTHERS WITHOUT THE PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT OF STUDIO T-SQ., INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED, COPYRIGHT 2010. a) U O co 0 a) U GATES +ASSOCIATES LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE LAND PLANNING • URBAN DESIGN 2671 CROW CANYON ROAD, CALIFORNIA 94583 T 925.736.8176 www.dgates.com ey Oak Partners 171 734 The Alameda Sheet Title PLANT LIST AND PLANT PALETTE Job No. Date: Scale: Drawn By: JK P4724 03/14/2017 Sheet No: L_3 San Jose, California SITE FURNISHINGS Stepped Corten Planter Wall Deck with Tree Cutouts CABLE RAILING ON BENCH BENCH SEAT BACK BENCH SUPPORT POLE/PIER WOOD FACADE AROUND DECK, 1/8" GAP BETWEEN BOARDS L. ►hy�i1� e. I sue' ."(01/` W a a PLANTING CURB PARKING SPACE 41, • 378, S.C.D. DECK AROUND TREE SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-011 Laser Cut Corten Planter Built-in Benches IR EXISTING OAK TREE TO REMAIN TREE PRESERVATION NOTES FOR TREE # 17: I. WOOD FACADE AROUND DECK TO BE BUILT WITH 1/8" GAP BETWEEN SLATS TO ALLOW FOR RAINFALL TO REACH TREE ROOTS 2. AS MUCH NATURAL LEAF LITTER TO REMAIN WITHIN DRIPLINE 3. MULCH UNDER TREE CANOPY • 382, S.C.D. 1,4 FG LOW CONCRETE PLANTER PEDESTRIAN CONCRETE PAVING RETAINING WALL, SEE CIVIL DRAWINGS Tables and Chairs Cable Railing \11%%,/114-IP irkTgraimit nralw ). v\-7.0viri PARKING LOT PLANTER Concrete Seatwall Pedestrian Concrete Colored Paving TREE SHRUB PLANTING, TYP. RAISED CONCRETE PLANTER SCALE: 3/8" = I'-0" TREE PROTECTION NOTES: 6' HIGH REDWOOD FENCE I . PRIOR TO INITIATING ANY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY IN THE AREA, INCLUDING GRADING, TEMPORARY PROTECTIVE FENCING SHALL BE INSTALLED AT EACH SITE TREE. FENCING SHALL BE LOCATED AT OR BEYOND THE CANOPY DRIP LINE SO THAT 100% OF THE DRIP LINE WILL BE PROTECTED BY FENCING. TO REDUCE SOIL COMPACTION FROM EQUIPMENT. ERECT STORY POSTS PERARBORIST REPORT PRIOR TO PRUNING. 2. THE CONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO WATER, FERTILIZE AND ATTEND TO OTHER MAINTENANCE NEEDS OF EXISTING TREES AS NEEDED PER ARBORIST'S RECOMMENDATIONS TO MAINTAIN HEALTHY GROWTH THROUGHOUT THE CONSTRUCTION PERIOD. SIX FEET DIAMETER, MINIMUM, BY SIX INCH TALL EARTH BERMS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED AT THE BASE OF EACH TREE TO FUNCTION AS TEMPORARY WATERING BASINS DURING THE CONSTRUCTION PERIOD. TREES SHALL BE WATERED ACCORDING TO WEATHER AND TREE REQUIREMENTS. APPROVED MULCH OF 1-2 INCH SIZED WOOD CHIPS SHALL BE PLACED AT A DEPTH OF 4 INCHES WHERE NO EXCAVATION IS TO OCCUR IN THE VICINITY OF THE TREES TO BE PROTECTED. 3. LOW HANGING LIMBS OF SAVED TREES SHALL BE PRUNED PRIOR TO GRADING, OR ANY EQUIPMENT MOBILIZATION ON SITE. THE PURPOSE OF THIS REQUIREMENT IS TO AVOID TEARING LIMBS BY HEAVY EQUIPMENT 4. THIS FENCING SHALL SERVE AS A BARRIER TO PREVENT DRIP LINE ENCROACHMENT OF ANY TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES AND EQUIPMENT. NO OILS,. GAS, CHEMICALS, LIQUID WASTE, SOLID WASTE CONSTRUCTION MACHINERY OR CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS SHALL BE STORED OR ALLOWED TO STAND FOR ANY PERIOD OF TIME WITHIN THE DRIP LINE OF THE TREE. FURTHER, NO ONE SHALL ENTER THE FENCE PERIMETER FOR ANY REASON EXCEPT FOR THE PURPOSE OF MONITORING THE HEALTH OF THE TREE. ACCIDENTAL DAMAGE TO BARK, ROOT CROWN, OR LIMBS MAY INCREASE POTENTIAL FOR FUTURE DECLINE. 5. A TREE PROTECTION ZONE' SIGN SHALL BE POSTED AT EACH TREE INDICATING THE PURPOSE OF THE FENCING. 6. RETAIN EXISTING NATURLA LEAF AND TWIG LITTER UNDERNEATH THE CAOPY OF TREES TO REMAIN, THE NATURAL MULCH SHOULD ONLY BE REMOVED IN THE LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENTS. C� EXISTING TREE TO REMAIN DRIP LINE 4' SNOW FENCING STEEL STAKE, 6'-0"O.C. MAX 71- I —III— = 1 — I -1 11 III =IIIa I I- I I 11II EXTEND FENCING PERIMETER BY 50% BEYOND THE DRIPLINE OF MATURE SPECIMEN OAKS WHERE POSSIBLE. Plan J L Elevation EXISTING TREE PROTECTIVE FENCING SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" STUDIO T SQUARE : Architecture : Planning • Urban Design 304 12th Street, Suite 2A Oakland, California 94607 (510) 451 - 2850 -HIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS INFORMATION ROPRIETARY TO STUDIO T-SQ, INC. AND IS FURNISHED ,N CONFIDENCE FOR THE LIMITED PURPOSE OF EVALUATION OR REVIEW. THIS DOCUMENT OR ITS CONTENTS MAY NOT BE USED FOR ANY OTHER PURPOSE AND MAY NOT BE REPRODUCED OR DISCLOSED TO OTHERS WITHOUT THE PRIOR WRITTEN ONSENT OF STUDIO T-SQ., INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED, —OPYRIGHT 2010. 0 O -d > CD U c chester Blvd. and Shelburne Way, Los Gatos, CA GATES +ASSOCIATES LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE LAND PLANNING • URBAN DESIGN 2671 CROW CANYON ROAD, CALIFORNIA 94583 T 925.736.8176 www.dgates.com co 0 CCS 0 i 734 The Alameda San Jose, California Sheet Title: SITE FURNISHINGS Job No. Date: Scale: Drawn By: JK P4724 03/14/2017 Sheet No: L_4 WINCHESTER BOULEVARD EXISTING WALL TO REMAIN SCREEN PLANTING 42" MASONRY WALL ON PARKING STRUCTURE TO BLOCK HEADLIGHTS LIGHTING LEGEND � I - - ��7 f ��• 'rL�M��I ':Ilk • IIIVEMINV,471EML=Nr.MNIMIR,,ME`"�� ii / i / V� ; �4111111PIIIII/cifill /c��iiii%�i ��i i/iii i�• /,//////,i,�/,/i//////,//,/i/,/��'iii/i��i/iii/i///��i�,/i��/i/,/�/i■■■ „„„1144 „/ „//%/iii/i%%%j%%%%/i%%% //ii%/i/%ii� i%�i%�%/�i%//i'%�% //ii/�ii�i/;7 �,i%//i�i�iiiii��ii/'�'ii� ii��i�i;i)1 ��/ / //i'i iii/i i�/i/iiii�iii i��i��/%��,/i'��ii�ii/ii�ii�/ i/iii, I I BOLLARD LIGHT PARKING LOT LIGHT • WALL MOUNTED NICHE LIGHT WALL MOUNTED NICHE LIGHT i LI Ell J` PARKING LOT LIGHTING, TYP. LIGHTING IMAGES SCREEN PLANTING 42" HIGH MASONRY WALL ON PARKING STRUCTURE TO BLOCK HEADLIGHTS BOLLARD LIGHT, TYP. BOLLARD LIGHT, TYP. Bollard Light MFR: Landscape Forms Model: Multiplicity Parking Lot Light MFR: McGraw -Edison Model: Galleon LED area and roadway luminaire 70 CRI, 4000K, IA Lightsquares and spill light eliminator optics with house side shield Wall -mounted Niche Light MFR: Cooper Model: Impact Elite Luminaire Lightbar iv/ 0 10' 20' 40' STUDIO T SQUARE : Architecture : Planning : Urban Design : 304 12th Street, Suite 2A : Oakland, California 94607 : (510) 451 - 2850 THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS INFORMATION PROPRIETARY TO STUDIO T-SQ, INC. AND IS FURNISHED IN CONFIDENCE FOR THE LIMITED PURPOSE OF EVALUATION OR REVIEW. THIS DOCUMENT OR ITS CONTENTS MAY NOT BE USED FOR ANY OTHER PURPOSE AND MAY NOT BE REPRODUCED OR DISCLOSED TO OTHERS WITHOUT THE PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT OF STUDIO T-SQ., INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED, COPYRIGHT 2010. n U O co W 0 U) 0 U Winchester Blvd. and Shelburne Way, Los Gatos, CA GATES +ASSOCIATES LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE LAND PLANNING • URBAN DESIGN 2671 CROW CANYON ROAD. CALIFORNIA 94583 T 925.736.8176 www.dgates. com 0 a) co 734 The Alameda San Jose, California Sheet Title: LANDSCAPE LIGHTING Job No. Date: Scale: Drawn By: P4724 03/14/2017 1'r=20 JK Sheet Nc L_5 r % I F T A 11 r. zrt \ Tr n A "" 1 D A2.1 A A2.0 WINCHESTER BLVD 0 G � 1 1 +379'+ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 UP FAN • r • CONTINUOUS CURB 0 • 10'-0" ETBACK 25'-0" 4+ 64' 4.4% SUBTERRANEAN GARAGE 87 PARKING C � A2.0 — - i STORAGE/MECH --+368.5' w 2 --+364' /-?.; 9'-0" 81-6" TYP. 0 N +364' 20'-0" 0 QI CO 0 SAFETY RAILING 1' 0 ONE WAY `" SPEED RAMP BIKE STORAGE 36 10% METER ROOM 20% J UP MECH UP 10'-7" Lli • • CONTINUOUS CURB O d— TRASH d 4-+383' 437 o G� 16' 32' 64' 111111111 01' 2 m OJ C Z m STUDIO T SQUARE : Architecture : Planning : Urban Design : 304 12th Street, Suite 2A : Oakland, California 94607 : (510) 451 - 2850 THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS INFORMATION PROPRIETARY TO STUDIO T-SQ, INC. AND IS FURNISHED IN CONFIDENCE FOR THE LIMITED PURPOSE OF EVALUATION OR REVIEW. THIS DOCUMENT OR ITS CONTENTS MAY NOT BE USED FOR ANY OTHER PURPOSE AND MAY NOT BE REPRODUCED OR DISCLOSED TO OTHERS WITHOUT THE PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT OF STUDIO T-SQ., INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED, COPYRIGHT 2010. a) U 0 7-3\ m '0 (1) W U Winchester Blvd. and Shelburne Way, Los Gatos, CA ey Oak Partners co 734 The Alameda San Jose, California Sheet Title: BUILDING PLAN SUBTERRANEAN LEVEL Job No. 15019 Date: 03/14/2017 1/16" = 1'-0" Scale: Drawn By: Sheet No: AI.O 1 1 1 1 1 1 DN +379' A.. A2.0/ WINCHESTER BLVD B � C A2 ! A2.0 ' A2A2.0 ++379' • ° g ° ± 78 6'-8" 134'-4" +381.5' LOBBY 1 10'-0" 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 +374.5' 25'-0" 18'-0" TYP. A UP SH BASEMENT BELOW SH UP +374.5' 17'-4" j 201'-6" • O ❑ ❑ 0 GROUND LEVEL 15,510 SF .' +381.5' O ❑ ❑ ❑ 50'-6" P ° 1 N M 0 0 173'-4" 8'-0" _ _ 97 9 D z O En N PLANTERS 41 PARKING 6" TYY� -+374.5' 00 TURN AROUND AREA i/ DN • • CONTINUOUS CURB • TRAS-I N 20'-6" �— TRELLIS 1 1 1 IMPERMEABLE ROOF OVER TRASH - +383' +378' SITE (GROSS): 1.31 ACRE OFFICE (GROSS): 30,070 SF PARKING REQ'D: 128 CARS PARKING PRV'D: 128 CARS COVERAGE: 27.2% (40% MAX) 16' 32' 64' STUDIO T SQUARE : Architecture : Planning : Urban Design : 304 12th Street, Suite 2A : Oakland, California 94607 : (510) 451 - 2850 THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS INFORMATION PROPRIETARY TO STUDIO T-SQ, INC. AND IS FURNISHED IN CONFIDENCE FOR THE LIMITED PURPOSE OF EVALUATION OR REVIEW. THIS DOCUMENT OR ITS CONTENTS MAY NOT BE USED FOR ANY OTHER PURPOSE AND MAY NOT BE REPRODUCED OR DISCLOSED TO OTHERS WITHOUT THE PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT OF STUDIO T-SQ., INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED, COPYRIGHT 2010. Winchester Blvd. and Shelburne Way, Los Gatos, CA ey Oak Partners 734 The Alameda San Jose, California Sheet Title: BUILDING PLAN GROUND LEVEL Job No. 15019 Date: 03/14/2017 1/16" = 1'-0" Scale: Drawn By: Sheet No: A1.1 A A2.0 WINCHESTER BLVD B C A2.0 2 A2.0 ° ° ° 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ° ROOF BELOW DN T O 0 201'-5" 2ND LEVEL OFFICE 14,560 SF 4+394.5' ° � 4 ❑ ❑ 0 0 202'-6" M CO ° 1 1 elk 16' 32' 64' ° ° 0 STUDIO T SQUARE : Architecture : Planning : Urban Design : 304 12th Street, Suite 2A : Oakland, California 94607 : (510) 451 - 2850 THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS INFORMATION PROPRIETARY TO STUDIO T-SQ, INC. AND IS FURNISHED IN CONFIDENCE FOR THE LIMITED PURPOSE OF EVALUATION OR REVIEW. THIS DOCUMENT OR ITS CONTENTS MAY NOT BE USED FOR ANY OTHER PURPOSE AND MAY NOT BE REPRODUCED OR DISCLOSED TO OTHERS WITHOUT THE PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT OF STUDIO T-SQ., INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED, COPYRIGHT 2010. W 7-3 O > m 0 0 U Winchester Blvd. and Shelburne Way, Los Gatos, CA ey Oak Partners 734 The Alameda San Jose, California Sheet Title: BUILDING PLAN SECOND LEVEL Job No. 15019 Date: 03/14/2017 1/16" = 1'-0" Scale: Drawn By: Sheet No: AI.2 1 +379' A2.1 A A2.0 +3 18'-7" 78' -2:12 PITCH L 1/2:12 PITCH- 25'-9" A 22'-6" ' / 9-8" FAN VENT N 1111 J WINCHESTER BLVD A A MECH / HVAC 89'-0 1 o 47'-6' r ' 10'-8" L r 0 C A2.0 b. 4 57'-0" +382' L 1/2:12 PITCH ow- 351-3" T 1 1 16' 32' 64' 4-+383' 111111111 2 m r OJ Z m STUDIO T SQUARE : Architecture : Planning : Urban Design : 304 12th Street, Suite 2A : Oakland, California 94607 : (510) 451 - 2850 THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS INFORMATION PROPRIETARY TO STUDIO T-SQ, INC. AND IS FURNISHED IN CONFIDENCE FOR THE LIMITED PURPOSE OF EVALUATION OR REVIEW. THIS DOCUMENT OR ITS CONTENTS MAY NOT BE USED FOR ANY OTHER PURPOSE AND MAY NOT BE REPRODUCED OR DISCLOSED TO OTHERS WITHOUT THE PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT OF STUDIO T-SQ., INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED, COPYRIGHT 2010. a) 7-3 O > m 0 0 U Winchester Blvd. and Shelburne Way, Los Gatos, CA ey Oak Partners 734 The Alameda San Jose, California Sheet Title: BUILDING ROOF PLAN Job No. 15019 Date: 03/14/2017 1/16" = 1'-0" Scale: Drawn By: Sheet No: AI.3 35' ABOVE EXIST GRADE 4'-0" + 370.5' 49'-2" PLANTER AT GRADE PARKING + 374.5' + 372.5' SUBTERRANEAN + 364' WINCHESTER BLVD B C - 1 D A B C 1 D AVM DNHf181DHS KEY MAP DASHED LINE REPRESENTS THE MAXIMUM HEIGHT ALLOWED PER TOWN CODE + 394.5' + 381.5' UPPER LEVEL OFFICE GROUND LEVEL OFFICE + 379'- + 368.5' 35'-11" 2 SCALE: 1/32" = 1' - 0" BUILDING SETBACK TOP OF ROOF WINCHESTER BLVD +,383.5' @ SIDEWALK SECTION C SHELBURNE WAY + 378' @ SIDEWALK 20'-6" SCALE: 1/16" = 1' - 0" 33'-5" I_ 32'-8" BUILDING SETBACK A 14'-0" 4'-0" J► 35' ABOVE EXIST GRADE 53'-6" AT GRADE PARKING + 374.5' SUBTERRANEAN + 364' 35' ABOVE EXIST GRADE 49'-2" PLANTER AT GRADE PARKING + 374.5' + 372.5' SUBTERRANEAN + 364' DASHED LINE REPRESENTS THE MAXIMUM HEIGHT ALLOWED PER TOWN CODE 46'-5" BUILDING SETBACK TOP OF ROOF DASHED LINE REPRESENTS THE MAXIMUM HEIGHT ALLOWED PER TOWN CODE UPPER LOBBY EXISTING GRADE DASHED LINE REPRESENTS THE MAXIMUM HEIGHT ALLOWED PER TOWN CODE MECH. WELL SCREENED FROM STREET VIEW 1/12 PITCH ROOF + 394.5' MECH. WELL SCREENED FROM STREET VIEW UPPER LEVEL OFFICE + 394.5' GROUND LEVEL OFF CE + 381.5' + 368.5' 19'-0" 3/12 PITCH RO UPPER LEVEL OFFICE GROUND LEVEL OFFICE + 368.5' [V r 9 43'-5" r-., BUILDING SETBACK WINCHESTER BLVD 381.6' @ SIDEWALK SECTION A ri SCALE: 1/16" = 1' - 0" TOP OF ROOF + 380.8' WINCHESTER BLVD �VI+ 382.8' @ SIDEWALK SECTION B 16'-8" 78'-0" 3 SCALE: 1/16" = 1' - 0" P PLANTER BUILDING SETBACK AT GRADE PARKING + 377.4' UBTERRANEAN GA + 364' GE SECTION D 5 SCALE: 1/16" = 1' - 0" STUDIO T SQUARE : Architecture : Planning : Urban Design : 304 12th Street, Suite 2A : Oakland, California 94607 : (510) 451 - 2850 THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS INFORMATION PROPRIETARY TO STUDIO T-SQ, INC. AND IS FURNISHED IN CONFIDENCE FOR THE LIMITED PURPOSE OF EVALUATION OR REVIEW. THIS DOCUMENT OR ITS CONTENTS MAY NOT BE USED FOR ANY OTHER PURPOSE AND MAY NOT BE REPRODUCED OR DISCLOSED TO OTHERS WITHOUT THE PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT OF STUDIO T-SQ., INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED, COPYRIGHT 2010. ey Oak Partners Sheet Title: SITE SECTION Job No. Date: Scale: Drawn By: 15019 03/14/2017 1/16" = 1'-0" 734 The Alameda San Jose, California Sheet No: A2.0 METAL ROOF CMU WALL METAL FRAME GATE WITH WOOD ACCENT 15'-4" 0 METAL TRELLIS ❑ ■ ■ ❑ ❑ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ DRIVEWAY GUTTER AND DOWNSPOUT CMU WALL 10'-7" 1.12 PITCH ROOF ■�■■ ■ � ■■■ ■ ■■■■■ 11:1 WWI J■I;i 1Mi1:1 PLANTER METAL ROOF METAL FRAME GATE WITH WOOD ACCENT TRASH ENCLOSURE SECTION 2 SCALE: 1/4" = 1' - 0" TRASH ENCLOSURE SECTION SCALE: 1/4" = 1' - 0" 1 i STUDIO T SQUARE Architecture Planning : Urban Design : 304 12th Street, Suite 2A : Oakland, California 94607 : (510) 451 - 2850 THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS INFORMATION PROPRIETARY TO STUDIO T-SQ, INC. AND IS FURNISHED IN CONFIDENCE FOR THE LIMITED PURPOSE OF EVALUATION OR REVIEW. THIS DOCUMENT OR ITS CONTENTS MAY NOT BE USED FOR ANY OTHER PURPOSE AND MAY NOT BE REPRODUCED OR DISCLOSED TO OTHERS WITHOUT THE PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT OF STUDIO T-SQ., INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED, COPYRIGHT 2010. 4) 7-3 O > m 0 0 U Sheet Title: ey Oak Partners Co 734 The Alameda San Jose, California TRASH ENCLOSURE ELEVATION & SECTION Job No. 15019 Date: 03/14/2017 1 /4" = 1 '-0" Scale: Drawn By: Sheet No: A3.0 SOUTH ELEVATION SCALE: 1/16" = 1' - 0" 4 WEST ELEVATIONLE SCALE: 1/16" = 1' - 0" ■��a��ti��r�irl�rl��i�r�r�ffrr�IWrl>Mrr�rrlr��Wrs�rlrrtrrrr!�Mrrrr�lwMrrt��■ EAST ELEVATION 2 SCALE: 1/16" = 1' - 0" NORTH ELEVATION '^\ SCALE: 1/16" = 1' - 0" STUDIO T SQUARE : Architecture : Planning : Urban Design : 304 12th Street, Suite 2A : Oakland, California 94607 : (510) 451 - 2850 THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS INFORMATION PROPRIETARY TO STUDIO T-SQ, INC. AND IS FURNISHED IN CONFIDENCE FOR THE LIMITED PURPOSE OF EVALUATION OR REVIEW. THIS DOCUMENT OR ITS CONTENTS MAY NOT BE USED FOR ANY OTHER PURPOSE AND MAY NOT BE REPRODUCED OR DISCLOSED TO OTHERS WITHOUT THE PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT OF STUDIO T-SQ., INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED, COPYRIGHT 2010. W 7-3 O > m 0 0 U Winchester Blvd. and Shelburne Way, Los Gatos, CA ey Oak Partners Co 734 The Alameda San Jose, California Sheet Title: ELEVATIONS Job No. 15019 Date: 03/14/2017 1/16" = 1'-0" Scale: Drawn By: Sheet No: A4.0 7---- , ---A ' - - „, _ _„,,,,,_, 7 ,•,- , 1 ..---- - _ - ..7%". -4E,-, • - - . ,./- --- ,-- _ _ _ .--." -. _ . . . I ..-/- .,,..- - ./. .7." AN- - - 7 .; ,,-- , r__ ,- / /.; ! _ i___71 — -I ,- _ ___;,' , ,..' , • . _ e' - - ..' ." — .." — — STUDIO T SQUARE : Architecture : Planning : Urban Design : 304 12th Street, Suite 2A : Oakland, California 94607 : (510) 451 - 2850 THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS INFORMATION PROPRIETARY TO STUDIO T-SQ, INC. AND IS FURNISHED IN CONFIDENCE FOR THE LIMITED PURPOSE OF EVALUATION OR REVIEW. THIS DOCUMENT OR ITS CONTENTS MAY NOT BE USED FOR ANY OTHER PURPOSE AND MAY NOT BE REPRODUCED OR DISCLOSED TO OTHERS WITHOUT THE PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT OF STUDIO T-SQ., INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED, COPYRIGHT 2010. TVITATZINEI: WillE1741745711TWAYETAFWeliM101. - •ak Partner co e *11111574PRIllterili Sheet Title: PERSPECTIVE - VIEW FROM WINCHESTER Job No. 15019 Date: 03/14/2017 Scale: Drawn By: Sheet No: I M 1 . 0 r • 111. A• Y ltil r i, x 1 ! r, ► t��Ct 1 f i,+• 1,4 - STUDIO T SQUARE : Architecture : Planning : Urban Design : 304 12th Street, Suite 2A : Oakland, California 94607 : (510) 451 - 2850 THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS INFORMATION PROPRIETARY TO STUDIO T-SQ, INC. AND IS FURNISHED IN CONFIDENCE FOR THE LIMITED PURPOSE OF EVALUATION OR REVIEW. THIS DOCUMENT OR ITS CONTENTS MAY NOT BE USED FOR ANY OTHER PURPOSE AND MAY NOT BE REPRODUCED OR DISCLOSED TO OTHERS WITHOUT THE PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT OF STUDIO T-SQ., INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED, COPYRIGHT 2010. a) 7-3 0 > m 0 0 U - • ak Partner c3 e Sheet Title: PERSPECTIVE Job No. Date: Scale: Drawn By: 15019 03/14/2017 Sheet No: IM1.1 117 ckm 4,- „ g4 • no-!... r • IV" /111" • • _ 4 0.010 e rig Iv a. . • „ow.. IMP r eV. STUDIO T SQUARE : Architecture : Planning : Urban Design : 304 12th Street, Suite 2A : Oakland, California 94607 : (510) 451 - 2850 THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS INFORMATION PROPRIETARY TO STUDIO T-SQ, INC. AND IS FURNISHED IN CONFIDENCE FOR THE LIMITED PURPOSE OF EVALUATION OR REVIEW. THIS DOCUMENT OR ITS CONTENTS MAY NOT BE USED FOR ANY OTHER PURPOSE AND MAY NOT BE REPRODUCED OR DISCLOSED TO OTHERS WITHOUT THE PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT OF STUDIO T-SQ., INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED, COPYRIGHT 2010. a) 0 7-3 > co .ci5 c.) TVITATZINEI: WillE1741745711TWAYETAFWeliM101. - •ak Partner co e *11111574PRIllterili Sheet Title: PERSPECTIVE Job No. Date: Scale: Drawn By: Sheet No: 15019 03/14/2017 IM1.2 CANOPY METAL OFFICE ENTRY ALUMINUM WITH CLEAR GLASS WINDOW ALUMINUM ALL WEATHER ROOF STANDING SEAM METAL WALL METAL PANEL SIDING WALL WOOD -COLORED SIDING WALL SMOOTH TROWELED PLASTER i . 4I10060!$00N00 00610000.00000000100000010001011100001 000001 • molr w C6) C7) C2) CO c4D (5D i WEST ELEVATION SCALE: 3/32" = 1' - 0" C3) CO C5) (2) EAST ELEVATION SCALE: 3/32" = 1' - 0" 1 STUDIO T SQUARE : Architecture : Planning : Urban Design : 304 12th Street, Suite 2A : Oakland, California 94607 : (510) 451 - 2850 THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS INFORMATION PROPRIETARY TO STUDIO T-SQ, INC. AND IS FURNISHED IN CONFIDENCE FOR THE LIMITED PURPOSE OF EVALUATION OR REVIEW. THIS DOCUMENT OR ITS CONTENTS MAY NOT BE USED FOR ANY OTHER PURPOSE AND MAY NOT BE REPRODUCED OR DISCLOSED TO OTHERS WITHOUT THE PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT OF STUDIO T-SQ., INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED, COPYRIGHT 2010. a) 7-3 O > m 0 0 U • Winchester Blvd. and Shelburne Way, Los Gatos, CA ey Oak Partners Co 734 The Alameda San Jose, California Sheet Title: MATERIALS AND COLORS Job No. 15019 Date: 03/14/2017 3/32" = 1' - 0" Scale: Drawn By: Sheet No: IM2.0