Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Attachment 01
TOWN OF LOS GATOS PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT MEETING DATE: 07/26/2017 DATE: JULY 21, 2017 TO: PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: JOEL PAULSON, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR ITEM NO: 4 SUBJECT: ARCHITECTURE AND SITE APPLICATION S-16-052 AND MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION ND-17-001. PROJECT LOCATION: 26 ALPINE AVENUE. APPLICANT: TOM SLOAN. PROPERTY OWNER: TOBY AND SUSAN COREY. REQUESTING APPROVAL TO CONSTRUCT A NEW SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE AND REMOVE A LARGE PROTECTED TREE ON VACANT PROPERTY ZONED R- 1:20. APN 529-37-042. DEEMED COMPLETE: JUNE 27, 2017 FINAL DATE TO TAKE ACTION: DECEMBER 27, 2017 RECOMMENDATION: Approval, subject to the recommended conditions of approval. PROJECT DATA: General Plan Designation: Low Density Residential Zoning Designation: R-1:20, Single -Family Residential, minimum lot size 20,000 square feet Applicable Plans & Standards: Residential Design Guidelines and Hillside Development Standards and Guidelines 20,000 square feet Parcel Size: Surrounding Area: Existing Land Use General Plan Land Use Designation Zoning North Residential Medium Density Residential R-1D South Residential Low Density Residential R-1:20 East Residential Low Density Residential R-1:20 West Residential Low Density Residential and Medium Density Residential R-1:8 and R-1D PREPARED BY: JOCELYN PUGA Associate Planner Reviewed by: Planning Manager and Community Development Director 110 E. Main Street Los Gatos, CA 95030 • 408-354-6874 www.losgatosca.gov ATTACHMENT 1 PAGE 2 OF 8 SUBJECT: 26 ALPINE AVENUE/S-16-052 AND ND-17-001 JULY 21, 2017 CEQA: It has been determined that this project will not have a significant impact on the environment. Adoption of a Mitigated Negative Declaration, Errata, and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program to mitigate potential impacts to a less than significant level is recommended. FINDINGS: ■ As required by CEQA for adopting the Mitigated Negative Declaration. ■ As required by the Residential Design Guidelines that the project complies with the Residential Design Guidelines. ■ As required by the Hillside Development Standards & Guidelines that other than the exception to the Least Restrictive Development Area, the project complies with the applicable sections of the Hillside Development Standards & Guidelines. CONSIDERATIONS: ■ As required by Section 29.20.150 of the Town Code for granting approval of an Architecture and Site application. ACTION: The decision of the Planning Commission is final unless appealed within ten days. BACKGROUND: The subject property is the remaining undeveloped lot of a three lot subdivision which was approved by the Planning Commission in 1991. During the course of the subdivision hearing, several Planning Commissioners and neighbors raised concerns over the future lot development including "grading, tree removal, impact on the creek, privacy, shadow studies, the square footages of the buildings, and how obtrusive they might be" on surrounding properties. It was decided that the subdivision of the property located at 38 Alpine Avenue into three lots could be approved if conditions were set to limit the square footage of the future houses to no more than 2,500 square feet, protect specimen trees, and meet hillside grading and drainage standards. The Commission should note that pursuant to the State Subdivision Map Act, these types of conditions restricting the development of the site cannot be imposed. However, this direction can be considered during the Architecture and Site approval process. On July 27, 1993, the issue of modifying the 2,500-square foot maximum was discussed by the Conceptual Development Advisory Committee. The Committee determined that they would recommend an increase in the allowable square footage if such an increase was not in conflict with the adjacent neighborhood. However, the Committee expressed concerns about allowing N:\DEV\PC REPORTS\2017\Alpine 26.docx 7/21/2017 9:04 AM PAGE 3 OF 8 SUBJECT: 26 ALPINE AVENUE/S-16-052 AND ND-17-001 JULY 21, 2017 any significant square footage increases on two of the lots that had the steepest slopes, which included the subject parcel. Subsequently, applications for Architecture and Site approval for the subject property were applied for in 1995 and 1998; both applications were withdrawn due to concerns from neighbors regarding the size of the home and potential construction impacts. On June 30, 2004, another Architecture and Site application was filed to construct a 2,500-square foot multi -level home with a 1,382-square foot cellar for a total of 3,882 square feet with a 740- square foot attached garage. On May 27, 2009, the Planning Commission considered the application and continued the item to July 8, 2009. At the applicant's request, the item was continued to August 12, 2009. On August 12, 2009, the Planning Commission denied the application due to concerns regarding the mass of the home. The applicant appealed the decision by the Planning Commission and on October 5, 2009, the Town Council considered the appeal and remanded the project back to the Planning Commission with direction that the project be modified as the Planning Commission requested to reduce the mass of the right elevation and that the applicant work with staff. Following the Town Council decision, the applicant did not resubmit plans for Planning Commission consideration. Although the property is zoned R-1:20, it has a slope greater than 10 percent and as a result is subject to Chapter 2, Chapter 3, and Section C. of Chapter 6 of the Hillside Development Standards and Guidelines (HSD&G). The project is being considered by the Planning Commission due to the applicant's request for an exception to the Least Restrictive Development Area (LRDA) pursuant to the HDS&G. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: A. Architecture and Site Application Architecture and Site approval is required to construct a new residence. B. Location and Surrounding Neighborhood The subject site is a vacant lot located approximately 300 feet north of East Main Street (Exhibit 2). The lot is 20,000 square feet with an average slope of 41 percent, extensive tree cover, and a creek along the western portion of the property. The project site is accessed from Alpine Avenue. C. Zoning Compliance A single-family residence is permitted in the R-1:20 zone. The proposed residence is in compliance with the allowable floor area for the property. Additionally, the proposed N:\DEV\PC REPORTS\2017\Alpine 26.docx 7/21/2017 9:04 AM PAGE 4 OF 8 SUBJECT: 26 ALPINE AVENUE/S-16-052 AND ND-17-001 JULY 21, 2017 residence is in compliance with height, setback, building coverage, and on -site parking requirements. DISCUSSION: A. Architecture and Site Analysis The applicant is proposing to construct a new single-family home with 1,993 square feet of living floor area, 1,439 square feet of cellar, and a 415-square foot attached garage. The maximum height of the proposed building would be approximately 29 feet. The project proposes a contemporary style home with cedar siding, stone walls, and glass railing. Additionally, the project proposes sustainable design elements which include solar panels, a green eco roof, recycled and reclaimed building materials, and radiant floor heating. A color and materials sheet is included as Exhibit 11. A color and materials board will be available at the public hearing. Due to the slope of the lot, staff analyzed the project with the applicable sections of the HDS&G, including site selection, grading, drainage, driveways, parking, geologic safety, and retaining walls. The site does not contain a building area that is within the LRDA. The applicant has designed the house to be set into the hillside, appearing as a single -story along the front elevation to reduce the mass of the home from Alpine Avenue and as two stories at the rear and right elevations from Jackson Street. The Commission should note that a house cannot be designed at this site that is completely within the LRDA due to the fact that the majority of area with a slope of less than 30 percent is located within the required front and left side setbacks or within the required creek setback pursuant to the Guidelines and Standards for Land Use Near Streams (see creek discussion later in this report). Please see the applicant's letter of justification (Exhibit 6) for additional information regarding the proposed project. B. Design and Compatibility The Town's Architectural Consultant reviewed the project to provide recommendations regarding the architecture and neighborhood compatibility. The Consulting Architect noted that while the architectural style is different from others in the immediate neighborhood, the scale of the home related to Alpine Avenue would be complementary to the streetscape. In addition, the substantial tree cover would largely obscure views to the home from Jackson Street (Exhibit 7). The Consulting Architect had one recommendation to consider eliminating the circular driveway at the front of the home even though the existing curb cut for the driveway exists. N:\DEV\PC REPORTS\2017\Alpine 26.docx 7/21/2017 9:04 AM PAGE 5 OF 8 SUBJECT: 26 ALPINE AVENUE/S-16-052 AND ND-17-001 JULY 21, 2017 The applicant proposes to keep the circular driveway due to the fact that there is no on -street parking permitted at this end of Alpine Avenue to accommodate off-street parking. C. Neighborhood Compatibility The immediate neighborhood is made up of single and two-story residences and includes a mix of architectural styles. Based on Town and County records, the surrounding residences range in size from 1,316 square feet to 5,021 square feet. The floor area ratios (FAR) range from 0.06 FAR to 0.36 FAR. The applicant is proposing a residence of 1,993 square feet on a 20,000- square foot parcel (0.10 FAR). The following Neighborhood Analysis table reflects current conditions of the immediate neighborhood: ADDRESS House Garage Gross Lot Area House FAR Stories 38 Alpine Avenue 4,309 1,062 21,671 0.20 2 50 Alpine Avenue 3,120 824 21,671 0.14 2 27 Jackson Street 1,316 440 3,750 0.35 2 23 Jackson Street 1,577 399 4,376 0.36 2 19 Alpine Avenue 2,715 400 43,847 0.06 1 25 Alpine Avenue 5,021 795 44,523 0.11 2 47 Alpine Avenue 2,398 400 33,040 0.07 1 57 Alpine Avenue 3,827 764 26,100 0.15 2 26 Alpine Avenue (N) 1,993 415 20,000 0.10 2 26 Alpine Avenue (E) 0 0 20,000 0 0 The proposed residence would be the seventh largest home in the immediate neighborhood in terms of square footage and the seventh largest in terms of FAR. Pursuant to the HDS&G, properties with an average slope greater than 30 percent are subject to a net lot reduction of 60 percent. After the slope reduction, the maximum allowed square footage is 2,608 square feet. N:\DEV\PC REPORTS\2017\Alpine 26.docx 7/21/2017 9:04 AM PAGE 6 OF 8 SUBJECT: 26 ALPINE AVENUE/S-16-052 AND ND-17-001 JULY 21, 2017 D. Trees The Town's Consulting Arborist completed a peer review of the applicant's arborist report dated June 26, 2016 (Exhibit 8). The Consulting Arborist had two recommendations (Exhibit 9), which noted that the tree protection sheets should be included in the plan set and that four existing trees that are outside of the proposed development area should be shown on the site plan. Comments by the Consulting Arborist were incorporated in the plan set and addressed in the memorandum dated January 17, 2017 (Exhibit 10). The project proposes to remove 12 protected trees, of which one is considered to be a large protected tree. Eight of the 12 protected trees to be removed (trees #10, #12, #32, #33, #34, #35, #36, #37, and #57) are Coast Live Oaks, California Bays, or California Buckeyes which are proposed to be removed to accommodate the proposed residence. The project proposes to retain 21 Coast Live Oak trees (trees #1, #3, 4, 6, 8, 9, 14, 15, 18, 22, 23, 24, 27, 30, 42, 43, 44, 46, 47, 52, and 55), five Valley Oak trees (trees #17, 21, 25, 51, and 54), eight California Bay trees (trees #16, 20, 26, 29, 38, 41, 45, and 53), six California Buckeye trees (trees #28, 39, 40, 49, 50, and 56), two Prunus trees (trees #19 and 48), and two Blue Gum trees (trees #2 and 13) If the project is approved, tree protection measures would be implemented prior to and during construction. Replacement trees would be required to be planted pursuant to Town Code. Tree protection measures are incorporated as conditions of approval (Exhibit 4) to protect the trees to remain on the subject property and within the development area. E. Creek Setbacks The applicant is proposing a 26-foot 10-inch, setback from the top of bank, adjacent to the creek. The proposed setback conforms to the Guidelines and Standards for Land Use Near Streams which recommends a 20 to 25-foot setback from top of bank with an additional five feet of setback for parcels larger than 10,000 square feet. For the project's 20,000-square foot parcel, the recommended setback for the proposed structure is 25 to 30 feet. F. Grading/Geotechnical Review The applicant submitted geologic investigations that were reviewed by the Town's Geotechnical Consultant. As noted above, the average slope of the lot is 41 percent. The project proposes the excavation of approximately 1,550 cubic yards of soil with an export of 1,520 cubic yards being exported off -site during the construction. Although the site has very steep slopes, the investigations concluded that development of the site is feasible from a geologic and geotechnical engineering viewpoint. Conditions of approval have been included requiring compliance with the geotechnical recommendations. N:\DEV\PC REPORTS\2017\Alpine 26.docx 7/21/2017 9:04 AM PAGE 7 OF 8 SUBJECT: 26 ALPINE AVENUE/S-16-052 AND ND-17-001 JULY 21, 2017 G. Environmental Review An Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) (Exhibit 1) have been prepared for the project by the Town's Environmental Consultant, Kimley-Horn and Associates (available online at www.losgatosca.gov/26Alpine). The 30-day public review period began on June 23, 2017 and will end on July 24, 2017. The project will not result in a significant effect on the environment because mitigation measures have been added for Air Quality, Biological Resources, Cultural Resources, Geology and Soils, and Hydrology and Water Quality, mitigating potential impacts to a less -than -significant level. An Errata is included in Exhibit 12 illustrating changes and clarifications to the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration. A Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program has also been prepared for the project and is included in Exhibit 13. PUBLIC COMMENTS: Story poles and signage were installed on the site and written notice was sent to property owners and tenants within 300 feet of the subject property. Staff has received a public comment regarding the project from a neighbor with concerns regarding tree removal, construction noise, view impacts, roof and chimney height, and construction parking (Exhibit 14). CONCLUSION: A. Summary The proposed project would allow the applicant to construct a new single-family residence on a vacant lot. As proposed, the project would create a 1,993-square foot residence with a 1,439-square foot cellar, and a 415-square foot attached garage. Due to the slope of the site, the applicant is requesting an exception to the LRDA pursuant to the HDS&G. The MND prepared for the project found no significant environmental impacts from the construction of the proposed project. B. Recommendation Based on the analysis above, staff recommends approval of the Architecture and Site application subject to the recommended conditions of approval (Exhibit 4). If the Planning Commission finds merit with the proposed project, it should: 1. Adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (Exhibits 1 and 13), including the Errata Sheet (Exhibit 12); 2. Make the required finding that the project complies with the Residential Design Guidelines (Exhibit 3); N:\DEV\PC REPORTS\2017\Alpine 26.docx 7/21/2017 9:04 AM PAGE 8 OF 8 SUBJECT: 26 ALPINE AVENUE/S-16-052 AND ND-17-001 JULY 21, 2017 3. Make the finding that the exception to the Least Restrictive Development Area is appropriate and the project is otherwise in compliance with the applicable sections of the Hillside Development Standards and Guidelines (Exhibit 3); 4. Make the required considerations as required by Section 29.20.150 of the Town Code for granting approval of an Architecture & Site application (Exhibit 3); and 5. Approve Architecture & Site Application S-16-052 with the conditions contained in Exhibit 4 and the development plans in Exhibit 15. C. Alternatives Alternatively, the Commission can: 1. Continue the matter to a date certain with specific direction; or 2. Approve the application with additional and/or modified conditions; or 3. Deny the applications. EXHIBITS: Previously received under separate cover: 1. Mitigated Negative Declaration Received with this Staff Report: 2. Location Map 3. Required Findings and Considerations (one page) 4. Recommended Conditions of Approval (14 pages) 5. Project Description, received July 20, 2017 (two pages) 6. Letter of Justification, received July 20, 2017 (six pages) 7. Consulting Architect's Report, received August 29, 2016 (five pages) 8. Applicant's Arborist Report, dated June 26, 2016 (21 pages) 9. Consulting Arborist's Peer Review Report, dated November 8, 2016 (two pages) 10. Applicant's Addendum to Arborist Report, dated January 17, 2017 (one page) 11. Color and Material Sheet, received August 3, 2016 (one page) 12. Errata Sheet (two pages) 13. Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (seven pages) 14. Public comments received by 11:00 a.m., Friday, July 21, 2017 15. Development Plans, received July 3, 2017 (29 sheets) Distribution: Toby and Susan Corey, 122 8th Avenue, Santa Cruz, CA 95062 Tom Sloan, 1475 S. Bascom Avenue, Suite 208, Campbell, CA 95008 N:\DEV\PC REPORTS\2017\Alpine 26.docx 7/21/2017 9:04 AM 26 Alpine Avenue DfflIBIT 2 This Page Intentionally Left Blank PLANNING COMMISSION -July 26, 2017 REQUIRED FINDINGS & CONSIDERATIONS FOR: 26 Alpine Avenue Architecture and Site Application S-16-052 Mitigated Negative Declaration ND-17-001 Requesting approval to construct a new single-family residence on vacant property zoned R-1:20 APN 529-37-042. PROPERTY OWNER: Toby and Susan Corey APPLICANT: Tom Sloan FINDINGS Required findings for CEQA: ■ It has been determined that this project will not have a significant impact on the environment. Adoption of a Mitigated Negative Declaration, Errata, and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program to mitigate potential impacts to a less than significant level is adopted. Required Compliance with the Residential Design Guidelines: ■ The project is in compliance with the Residential Design Guidelines for single-family homes not in hillside residential areas. Required Compliance with Hillside Development Standards and Guidelines (HDS&G): Parcels with an average slope of 10 percent or greater outside of the Town of Los Gatos Hillside Area which shall be governed by the Residential Design Guidelines and the following sections of the Hillside Development Standards and Guidelines: Constraints Analysis and Site Selection excluding the standards for the visibility from off site and ridge line view protection, Site Planning for grading, drainage, driveways and parking, geologic safety, and Site Elements for retaining walls. ■ The project is in compliance with the applicable Hillside Development Standards and Guidelines with the exception to the Least Restrictive Development Area due to the slope of the site which' has been determined to be acceptable. CONSIDERATIONS: Considerations in review of Architecture & Site applications: • As required by Section 29.20.150 of the Town Code, the considerations in review of an Architecture and Site application were all made in reviewing this project. N:\DEV\fINDINGS\2017\Alpine 26.docx Examirr 3 This Page Intentionally Left Blank PLANNING COMMISSION - July 26, 2017 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 26 Alpine Avenue Architecture and Site Application S-16-052 Mitigated Negative Declaration ND-17-001 Requesting approval to construct a new single-family residence and remove a large protected tree on vacant property zoned R-1:20. APN 529-37-042. APPLICANT: Tom Sloan PROPERTY OWNER: Toby and Susan Corey TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT: Planning Division 1. APPROVAL: This application shall be completed in accordance with all of the conditions of approval listed below and in substantial compliance with the plans approved and noted as received by the Town on June 27, 2017. Any changes or modifications to the approved plans shall be approved by the Community Development Director, the Development Review Committee, the Planning Commission, or Town Council, depending on the scope of the changes. 2. EXPIRATION: The approval will expire two years from the approval date pursuant to Section 29.20.320 of the Town Code, unless the approval has been vested. 3. OUTDOOR LIGHTING: Exterior lighting shall be kept to a minimum, and shall be down directed fixtures that will not reflect or encroach onto adjacent properties. No flood lights shall be used unless it can be demonstrated that they are needed for safety or security. The lighting plan shall be reviewed during building plan check. 4. GENERAL: All existing trees shown on the plan and trees required to remain or to be planted are specific subjects of approval of this plan, and must remain on the site. 5. TREE REMOVAL PERMIT: A Tree Removal Permit shall be obtained for any trees to be removed, prior to the issuance of a building or grading permit. 6. ARBORIST REQUIREMENTS: The developer shall implement, at their cost, all recommendations made by Gareth Jones, identified in the Arborist reports, dated as received June 26, 2016 and January 17, 2017, in addition to the peer review report prepared by Deborah Ellis on November 8, 2016, respectively, on file in the Community Development Department. A Compliance Memorandum shall be prepared by the applicant and submitted with the building permit application detailing how the recommendations have or will be addressed. These recommendations must be incorporated in the building permit plans, and completed prior to issuance of a building permit where applicable. 7. TREE FENCING: Protective tree fencing shall be placed at the drip line of existing trees and shall remain through all phases of construction. Fencing shall be six foot high cyclone attached to two-inch diameter steel posts drive 18 inches into the ground and spaced no further than 10 feet apart. Include a tree protection fencing plan with the construction plans. EXHIBIT 4 8. REPLACEMENT TREES: New trees shall be planted to mitigate the Toss of trees being removed. The number of trees and size of replacement trees shall be determined using the canopy replacement table in the Town Code. Town Code requires a minimum 24-inch box size replacement tree. New trees shall be double staked with rubber ties and shall be planted prior to final inspection and issuance of occupancy permits. 9. WATER EFFICIENCY LANDSCAPE ORDINANCE: The final landscape plan, including landscape and irrigation plans and calculations, shall meet the Town of Los Gatos Water Conservation Ordinance or the State Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance, whichever is more restrictive. The final landscape plan shall be reviewed by the Town's consultant prior to issuance of building permits. A review fee based on the current fee schedule adopted by the Town Council is required when working landscape and irrigation plans are submitted for review. 10. FRONT YARD LANDSCAPE: Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy the front yard must be landscaped. 11. STORY POLES: The story poles on the project site shall be removed within 30 days of approval of the Architecture & Site application. 12. TOWN INDEMNITY: Applicants are notified that Town Code Section 1.10.115 requires that any applicant who receives a permit or entitlement from the Town shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the Town and its officials in any action brought by a third party to overturn, set aside, or void the permit or entitlement. This requirement is a condition of approval of all such permits and entitlements whether or not expressly set forth in the approval, and may be secured to the satisfaction of the Town Attorney. 13. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES MITIGATION MEASURE BIO-1: Special -status and Migratory Bird Species. The following avoidance measures shall be required to avoid the project's potential effects on special -status and migratory bird species. a. The removal of trees and shrubs shall be minimized to the extent feasible. b. If tree removal, pruning, grubbing and demolition activities are necessary, such activities shall be conducted outside of the breeding season (i.e., between September 1 and January 31), to avoid impacts to nesting birds. c. If tree removal, pruning, grubbing and demolition activities are scheduled to commence during the bird breeding season (i.e., between February 1 and August 31), a preconstruction survey shall be conducted by a qualified biologist no more than two weeks prior to the initiation of work. The preconstruction survey shall include the project footprint and up to a 300-foot buffer, access and sight -lines permitting. If no active nests of migratory birds are found, work may proceed without restriction and no further measures are necessary. If work is delayed more than two weeks, the preconstruction survey shall be repeated, if determined necessary by the project biologist. d. If active nests (i.e. nests with eggs or young birds present, or hosting an actively breeding adult pair) of special -status or migratory birds are detected, the project biologist shall designate non -disturbance buffers at a distance sufficient to minimize disturbance based on the nest location, topography, cover, species, and the type/duration of potential disturbance. No work shall occur within the non - disturbance buffers until the young have fledged, as determined by a qualified biologist. The appropriate buffer size shall be determined in cooperation with the CDFW and/or the USFWS. If, despite the establishment of a non -disturbance buffer it is determined that project activities are resulting in nest disturbance, work shall cease immediately and the CDFW and the USFWS shall be contacted for further guidance. e. If project activities must occur within the non -disturbance buffer, a qualified biologist shall monitor the nest(s) to document that no take of the nest (i.e., nest failure) will result. If it is determined that project activities are resulting in nest disturbance, work shall cease immediately and the CDFW and the USFWS shall be contacted for further guidance. 14. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES MITIGATION MEASURE BIO-2: Special -status Bats. The following avoidance measures shall be required to avoid the project's potential effects on special - status bats. a. Prior to the removal or significant pruning of trees and the demolition of buildings, a qualified bat biologist shall assess them for the potential to support roosting bats. Suitable bat roosting sites include trees with snags, rotten stumps, and decadent trees with broken limbs, exfoliating bark, cavities, and structures with cracks, joint seams and other openings to interior spaces. If there is no evidence of occupation by bats, work may proceed without further action. b. If suitable roosting habitat is present, the bat biologist shall recommend appropriate measures to prevent take of bats. Such measures may include exclusion and humane eviction (see "c" below) of bats roosting within structures during seasonal periods of peak activity (e.g., February 15 - April 15, and August 15 - October 30), partial dismantling of structures to induce abandonment, or other appropriate measures. c. If bat roosts are identified on the site, the following measures shall be implemented: ■ If non-breeding/migratory bats are identified on the site within a tree or building that is proposed for removal, then bats shall be passively excluded from the tree or building. This is generally accomplished by opening up the roost area to allow airflow through the cavity/crevice, or installing one-way doors. The bat biologist shall confirm that the bats have been excluded from the tree or building before it can be removed. ■ If a maternity roost of a special -status bat species is detected, an appropriate non - disturbance buffer zone shall be established around the roost tree or building site, in consultation with the CDFW. Maternity roost sites may be demolished only when it has been determined by a qualified bat biologist that the nursery site is not occupied. Demolition of maternity roost sites may only be performed during seasonal periods of peak activity (e.g., February 15 - April 15, and August 15 - October 30). ■ No additional mitigation for the Toss of roosting bat habitat is required. 15. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES MITIGATION MEASURE BIO-3: Tree Planting Plan. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations in the arborist report prepared for the proposed project by Gareth Jones on June 26, 2016 and January 17, 2017, in addition to the peer review report prepared by Deborah Ellis on November 8, 2016. The Tree Planting Plan shall include the following: a. Removal of all protected trees (all with 30-35 feet canopy diameters) will be replaced by four 24-inch box trees or two 36-inch box trees per tree removed. Replacement trees must be species from the Town of Los Gatos' approved tree species list. b. Removal of riparian tree species should be mitigated by additional plantings in the project area. Planting additional trees in the riparian set back is not advised due to the heavily shaded nature of the existing canopy cover. c. Ecologically suitable native understory plants should be planted on the hillside above the riparian set back. d. All landscaping shall be done with plants that are not known to be invasive. Use a reputable nursery to source native plants that are genetically similar to those found in the Santa Cruz Mountains. 16. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES MITIGATION MEASURE BIO-4: Sudden Oak Death Syndrome. a. Prior to removal or trimming of any potentially infected tree or carrier tree species, samples will be taken by a qualified arborist and sent to a laboratory to determine the presence or absence of SODS. If a positive test result occurs, the applicant shall immediately consult with the Oak Mortality Task Force and follow all applicable recommendations for further tree removal, trimming, disposal of vegetation, and for decontamination of equipment. 17. ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES AND HUMAN REMAINS MITIGATION MEASURE CUL-1: a. In the event that archaeological traces are encountered, all construction within a 50- meter radius of the find will be halted, the Community Development Director will be notified, and an archaeologist will be retained to examine the find and make appropriate recommendations. b. If human remains are discovered, the Santa Clara County Coroner will be notified. The Coroner will determine whether or not the remains are Native American. If the Coroner determines char the remains are not subject to his authority, he will notify the Native American Heritage Commission, who shall attempt to identify descendants of the deceased Native Americans. c. If the Community Development Director finds that the archaeological find is not a significant resource, work will resume only after the submittal of a preliminary archaeological report and after provisions for reburial and ongoing monitoring are accepted. Provisions for identifying descendants of a deceased Native American and for reburial will follow the protocol set forth in CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5( e). If the site is found to be a significant archaeological site, a mitigation program will be prepared and submitted to the Community Development Director for consideration and approval, in conformance with the protocol set forth in Public Resources Code Section 21083.2. d. A final report shall be prepared when a find is determined to be a significant archaeological site, and/or when Native American remains are found on the site. The final report will include background information on the completed work, a description and list of identified resources, the disposition and curation of these resources, any testing, other recovered information, and conclusions. 18. GEOLOGY AND SOILS MITIGATION MEASURE GEO-1: Geotechnical Report Recommendations. a. The project applicant shall implement all of the recommendations of the project geotechnical report, and any associated updates or revisions, related to site preparation and grading, foundation design, driveways, retaining walls, and drainage improvements. To ensure correct implementation, the geotechnical engineer shall review project plans and observe geotechnical-relevant aspects of proposed initial construction of roads and infrastructure. The geotechnical engineer shall submit an "as built" letter to the Director of Public Works stating that the project has been constructed in conformance with the recommendations of the geotechnical report. 19. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY MITIGATION MEASURE HWQ-1: GHG-1: a. Prior to the issuance of grading permits or improvement plans in lieu of grading permits, the applicant shall demonstrate to the satisfaction of the Town Engineer that the project's stormwater quality control measures, including the erosion control features described in the project's final Erosion Control Plan have been incorporated into the project design. 20. COMPLIANCE MEMORANDUM: A memorandum shall be prepared and submitted with the building plans detailing how the Conditions of Approval will be addressed. Building Division 21. PERMITS REQUIRED: A Building Permit is required for construction of the new single- family residence. This is a combination Building Permit which includes all required electrical, mechanical, and plumbing work as necessary. A separate Building Permit is required for any site retaining walls. 22. APPLICABLE CODES: The current codes as amended and adopted by the Town of Los Gatos as of January 1, 2017, are the 2016 California Building, Electrical, Mechanical, Plumbing, Fire, and Energy Codes and the 2016 California Residential Code and 2016 California Green Building Standards Code — Mandatory Measures only. 23. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: The Conditions of Approval must be blue -lined in full on the cover sheet of the construction plans. A Compliance Memorandum shall be prepared and submitted with the building permit application detailing how the Conditions of Approval will be addressed. 24. SIZE OF PLANS: Submit four sets of construction plans, minimum size 24" x 36", maximum size 30" x 42". 25. SOILS REPORT: A Soils Report (Geotechnical Investigation), prepared to the satisfaction of the Building Official, containing foundation and retaining wall design recommendations, shall be submitted with Building Permit Application. 26. FOUNDATION INSPECTIONS: A pad certificate prepared by a licensed Civil Engineer or Land Surveyor shall be submitted to the project building Inspector at foundation inspection. This certificate shall certify compliance with recommendations as specified in the soils report and that the building pad elevation and on -site retaining wall locations and elevations have been prepared according to the approved plans. Horizontal and vertical controls shall be set and certified by a licensed Land Surveyor or Civil Engineer for the following items: a. Building pad elevation b. Finish floor elevation c. Foundation corner locations d. Retaining wall locations and elevations 27. TOWN RESIDENTIAL ACCESSIBILITY/ADAPTABILITY STANDARDS: The new residence shall be designed with adaptability features for single-family residences per Town Resolution 1994-61 as follows: a. Wood backing (2" x 8" minimum) shall be provided in all bathroom walls at water closets, showers, and bathtubs, located 34-inches from the floor to the center of the backing, suitable for the installation of grab bars in needed in the future. b. All passage doors shall be at least 32-inches wide on the accessible floor level. c. The primary entrance shall be a 36-inch wide door with a 5' x 5' level landing no more than 1-inch out of plane with the immediate interior floor level and with an 18-inch clearance on the interior strike edge. d. A door buzzer, bell or chime shall be hard -sired at the primary entrance. 28. TITLE 24 ENERGY COMPLIANCE: All required California Title 24 Energy Compliance Forms must be blue -lined (sticky -backed) onto a sheet of the plans. 29. BACKWATER SEWER VALVE: The scope of this project may require the installation of a sanitary sewer backwater valve per Town Ordinance 6.50.025. Please provide information on the plans if a backwater valve is required and the location of the installation. The Town of Los Gatos and West Valley Sanitation District (WVSD) require backwater valves on drainage piping serving fixtures that have flood level rims less than 12-inches above the elevation of the next upstream manhole. 30. TOWN FIREPLACE STANDARDS: New wood burning fireplaces shall be an EPA Phase II approved appliance or gas appliance per Town Ordinance 1905. Tree limbs shall be cut within 10 feet of chimneys. 31. FIRE ZONE: All projects in the Town of Los Gatos require Class A roof assemblies. 32. WILDLAND-URBAN INTERFACE: This project is located in a Wildland-Urban Interface High Fire Area and new buildings must comply with Section R337 of the California Residential Code regarding materials and construction methods for exterior wildfire exposure. 33. DEFENSIBLE SPACE/FIRE BREAK LANDSCAPING PLAN: Provide a Defensible Space/Fire Break Landscaping Plan prepared by a California licensed Landscape Architect in conformance with California Public Resources Code 4291 and California Government Code Section 51182. 34. FIRE BREAK LANDSCAPING FINAL INSPECTION: Prior to Final Inspection, provide a letter from a California licensed Landscape Architect certifying that the landscaping and vegetation clearance requirements have been completed per the California Public Resources Code 4291 and California Government Code Section 51182. 35. SPECIAL INSPECTIONS: When a special inspection is required by CBC Section 1704, the architect or engineer of record shall prepare an inspection program that shall be submitted to Building Official for approval prior to issuance of the building permit. The Town Special Inspection form must be completely filled out and signed by all requested parties prior to permit issuance. Special Inspection forms are available from the Building Division Service Counter or online at www.losgatosca.gov/building 36. BLUEPRINT FOR A CLEAN BAY SHEET: The Town standard Santa Clara County Valley Nonpoint Source Pollution Control Program Sheet (24x36) shall be part of the plan submittal as the second page. The specification sheet is available at the Building Division Service Counter or ARC Blue Print for a fee or online at www.losgatosca.gov/building 37. APPROVALS REQUIRED: The project requires the following departments and agencies approval before issuing a building permit: a. Community Development — Planning Division: Jocelyn Puga (408) 354-6875 b. Engineering/Parks & Public Works Department: Kevin Bagley (408) 395-5340 c. Santa Clara County Fire Department: (408) 378-4010 d. West Valley Sanitation District: (408) 378-2407 e. Local School District: The Town will forward the paperwork to the appropriate school district(s) for processing. A copy of the paid receipt is required prior to permit issuance. TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE DIRECTOR OF PARKS AND PUBLIC WORKS: Engineering Division 38. GENERAL: All public improvements shall be made according to the latest adopted Town Standard Plans, Standard Specifications and Engineering Design Standards. All work shall conform to the applicable Town ordinances. The adjacent public right-of-way shall be kept clear of all job -related mud, silt, concrete, dirt and other construction debris at the end of the day. Dirt and debris shall not be washed into storm drainage facilities. The storing of goods and materials on the sidewalk and/or the street will not be allowed unless an encroachment permit is issued by the Engineering Division of the Parks and Public Works Department. The Applicant's representative in charge shall be at the job site during all working hours. Failure to maintain the public right-of-way according to this condition may result in the issuance of correction notices, citations, or stop work orders and the Town performing the required maintenance at the Applicant's expense. 39. APPROVAL: This application shall be completed in accordance with all of the conditions of approval listed below and in substantial compliance with the latest reviewed and approved development plans. Any changes or modifications to the approved plans or conditions of approvals shall be approved by the Town Engineer. 40. ENCROACHMENT PERMIT: All work in the public right-of-way will require a Construction Encroachment Permit. All work over $5,000 will require construction security. It is the responsibility of the Applicant to obtain any necessary encroachment permits from affected agencies and private parties, including but not limited to, Pacific Gas and Electric (PG&E), AT&T, Comcast, Santa Clara Valley Water District, California Department of Transportation (Caltrans). Copies of any approvals or permits must be submitted to the Town Engineering Division of the Parks and Public Works Department prior to releasing any permit. 41. PRIVATE IMPROVEMENTS IN THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY (INDEMNITY AGREEMENT): The property owner shall enter into an agreement with the Town for all existing and proposed private improvements within the Town's right-of-way. The Owner shall be solely responsible for maintaining the improvements in a good and safe condition at all times and shall indemnify the Town of Los Gatos. The agreement must be completed and accepted by the Town Attorney, and a copy of the recorded agreement shall be submitted to the Engineering Division of the Parks and Public Works Department, prior to the issuance of any permits. 42. PUBLIC WORKS INSPECTIONS: The Applicant or their representative shall notify the Engineering Inspector at least twenty-four (24) hours before starting any work pertaining to on -site drainage facilities, grading or paving, and all work in the Town's right-of-way. Failure to do so will result in penalties and rejection of work that went on without inspection. 43. RESTORATION OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS: The Applicant shall repair or replace all existing improvements not designated for removal that are damaged or removed because of the Applicant's operations. Improvements such as, but not limited to: curbs, gutters, sidewalks, driveways, signs, pavements, raised pavement markers, thermoplastic pavement markings, etc., shall be repaired and replaced to a condition equal to or better than the original condition. Any new concrete shall be free of stamps, logos, names, graffiti, etc. Any concrete identified that is displaying a stamp or equal shall be removed and replaced at the Contractor's sole expense and no additional compensation shall be allowed therefore. Existing improvement to be repaired or replaced shall be at the direction of the Engineering Construction Inspector, and shall comply with all Title 24 Disabled Access provisions. The Applicant shall request a walk-through with the Engineering Construction Inspector before the start of construction to verify existing conditions. 44. SITE SUPERVISION: The General Contractor shall provide qualified supervision on the job site at all times during construction. 45. STREET/SIDEWALK CLOSURE: Any proposed blockage or partial closure of the street and/or sidewalk requires an encroachment permit. Special provisions such as limitations on works hours, protective enclosures, or other means to facilitate public access in a safe manner may be required, 46. PLAN CHECK FEES: Plan check fees shall be deposited with the Town prior to plan review at the Engineering Division of the Parks and Public Works Department. 47, INSPECTION FEES: Inspection fees shall be deposited with the Town prior to the issuance of any permits. 48. PLANS AND STUDIES: All required plans and studies shall be prepared by a Registered Professional Engineer in the State of California, and submitted to the Town Engineer for review and approval. Additionally, any studies imposed by Planning Commission or Town Council shall be funded by the Applicant. 49. GRADING PERMIT: A grading permit is required for all site grading and drainage work except for exemptions listed in Section 12.20.015 of The Code of the Town of Los Gatos (Grading Ordinance). The grading permit application (with grading plans) shall be made to the Engineering Division of the Parks and Public Works Department located at 41 Miles Avenue. The grading plans shall include final grading, drainage, retaining wall Iocation(s), driveway, utilities and interim erosion control. Grading plans shall list earthwork quantities and a table of existing and proposed impervious areas. Unless specifically allowed by the Director of Parks and Public Works, the grading permit will be issued concurrently with the building permit. The grading permit is for work outside the building footprint(s). A separate building permit, issued by the Building Department on E. Main Street, is needed for grading within the building footprint. 50. GRADING ACTIVITY RESTRICTIONS: Upon receipt of a grading permit, any and all grading activities and operations shall not commence until after the rainy season, as defined by the State Water Resources Control Board (October 1-April 30), has ended. 51. COMPLIANCE WITH HILLSIDE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: All grading activities and operations shall be in compliance with Section III of the Town's Hillside Development Standards and Guidelines. All development shall be in compliance with Section II of the Town's Hillside Development Standards and Guidelines. 52. DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENT: Prior to the issuance of any grading/improvement permits, whichever comes first, the Applicant shall: a) design provisions for surface drainage; and b) design all necessary storm drain facilities extending to a satisfactory point of disposal for the proper control and disposal of storm runoff; and c) provide a recorded copy of any required easements to the Town. 53. TREE REMOVAL: Copies of all necessary tree removal permits shall be provided prior to the issuance of a grading permit/building permit. 54. SURVEYING CONTROLS: Horizontal and vertical controls shall be set and certified by a licensed surveyor or registered civil engineer qualified to practice land surveying, for the following items: a. Retaining wall: top of wall elevations and locations. b. Toe and top of cut and fill slopes. 55. RETAINING WALLS: A building permit, issued by the Building Department at 110 E. Main Street, may be required for site retaining walls. Walls are not reviewed or approved by the Engineering Division of Parks and Public Works during the grading permit plan review process. 56. SOILS REPORT: One copy of the soils and geologic report shall be submitted with the application. The soils report shall include specific criteria and standards governing site grading, drainage, pavement design, retaining wall design, and erosion control. The reports shall be signed and "wet stamped" by the engineer or geologist, in conformance with Section 6735 of the California Business and Professions Code. 57. GEOLOGY AND SOILS MITIGATION MEASURE: A geotechnical investigation shall be conducted for the project to determine the surface and sub -surface conditions at the site and to determine the potential for surface fault rupture on the site. The geotechnical study shall provide recommendations for site grading as well as the design of foundations, retaining walls, concrete slab -on -grade construction, excavation, drainage, on -site utility trenching and pavement sections. All recommendations of the investigation shall be incorporated into project plans. 58. SOILS REVIEW: Prior to issuance of any permits, the Applicant's engineers shall prepare and submit a design -level geotechnical/geological investigation for review and approval by the Town. The Applicant's soils engineer shall review the final grading and drainage plans to ensure that designs for foundations, retaining walls, site grading, and site drainage are in accordance with their recommendations and the peer review comments. Approval of the Applicant's soils engineer shall then be conveyed to the Town either by letter or by signing the plans. 59. SOILS ENGINEER CONSTRUCTION OBSERVATION: During construction, all excavations and grading shall be inspected by the Applicant's soils engineer prior to placement of concrete and/or backfill so they can verify that the actual conditions are as anticipated in the design -level geotechnical report, and recommend appropriate changes in the recommendations contained in the report, if necessary. The results of the construction observation and testing shall be documented in an "as -built" letter/report prepared by the Applicant's soils engineer and submitted to the Town before final release of any occupancy permit is granted. 60. SOIL RECOMMENDATIONS: The project shall incorporate the geotechnical/geological recommendations contained in the Geotechnical Update Report & Supplemental Recommendations by Pollak Engineering. Inc., dated August 5, 2016, and any subsequently required report or addendum. Subsequent reports or addendum are subject to peer review by the Town's consultant and costs shall be borne by the Applicant. 61. WATER DESIGN: Water plans prepared by San Jose Water Company must be reviewed and approved prior to issuance of any permit. 62. UTILITIES: The Applicant shall install all new, relocated, or temporarily removed utility services, including telephone, electric power and all other communications lines underground, as required by Town Code Section 27.50.015(4 All new utility services shall be placed underground. Underground conduit shall be provided for cable television service. The Applicant is required to obtain approval of all proposed utility alignments from any and all utility service providers before a Certificate of Occupancy for any new building can be issued. The Town of Los Gatos does not approve or imply approval for final alignment or design of these facilities. 63. SIDEWALK REPAIR: The Applicant shall repair and replace to existing Town standards any sidewalk damaged now or during construction of this project. All new and existing adjacent infrastructure must meet current ADA standards. Sidewalk repair shall match existing color, texture and design, and shall be constructed per Town Standard Details. New concrete shall be free of stamps, logos, names, graffiti, etc. Any concrete identified that is displaying a stamp or equal shall be removed and replaced at the Contractor's sole expense and no additional compensation shall be allowed therefore. The limits of sidewalk repair will be determined by the Engineering Construction Inspector during the construction phase of the project. The improvements must be completed and accepted by the Town before a Certificate of Occupancy for any new building can be issued. 64. CURB AND GUTTER REPAIR: The Applicant shall repair and replace to existing Town standards any curb and gutter damaged now or during construction of this project. All new and existing adjacent infrastructure must meet Town standards. New curb and gutter shall be constructed per Town Standard Details. New concrete shall be free of stamps, logos, names, graffiti, etc. Any concrete identified that is displaying a stamp or equal shall be removed and replaced at the Contractor's sole expense and no additional compensation shall be allowed therefore. The limits of curb and gutter repair will be determined by the Engineering Construction Inspector during the construction phase of the project. The improvements must be completed and accepted by the Town before a Certificate of Occupancy for any new building can be issued. 65. SIGHT TRIANGLE AND TRAFFIC VIEW AREA: Any proposed improvements, including but not limiting to trees and hedges, will need to abide by Town Code Sections 23.10.080, 26.10.065, and 29.40.030. 66. FENCES: Fences between all adjacent parcels will need to be located on the property lines/boundary lines. Any existing fences that encroach into the neighbor's property will need to be removed and replaced to the correct location of the boundary lines before a Certificate of Occupancy for any new building can be issued. Waiver of this condition will require signed and notarized letters from all affected neighbors. 67. TRAFFIC IMPACT MITIGATION FEE: The Applicant shall pay the project's proportional share of transportation improvements needed to serve cumulative development within the Town of Los Gatos. The fee amount will be based upon the Town Council resolution in effect at the time the building permit is issued. The fee shall be paid before issuance of a building permit. The final traffic impact mitigation fee for this project shall be calculated from the final plans using the current fee schedule and rate schedule in effect at the time the building permit is issued, using a comparison between the existing and proposed uses. 68. CONSTRUCTION STREET PARKING: No vehicle having a manufacture's rated gross vehicle weight exceeding ten thousand (10,000) pounds shall be allowed to park on the portion of a street which abuts property in a residential zone without prior approval from the Town Engineer. The contractor would need to provide one -lane 2-way traffic control if they want to use a portion of the street for construction purposes, if approved by the Town Engineer. 69. HAULING OF SOIL: Hauling of soil on- or off -site shall not occur during the morning or evening peak periods (between 7:00 a.m. and 9:00 a.m. and between 4:00 p.m. and 6:00 p.m.), and at other times as specified by the Director of Parks and Public Works. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the Applicant shall work with the Town Building Department and Engineering Division Inspectors to devise a traffic control plan to ensure safe and efficient traffic flow under periods when soil is hauled on or off of the project site. This may include, but is not limited to provisions for the Applicant/Owner to place construction notification signs noting the dates and time of construction and hauling activities, or providing additional traffic control. Coordination with other significant projects in the area may also be required. Cover all trucks hauling soil, sand and other loose debris. 70. CONSTRUCTION NOISE: Between the hours of 8:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m., weekdays and 9:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. weekends and holidays, construction, alteration or repair activities shall be allowed. No individual piece of equipment shall produce a noise level exceeding eighty-five (85) dBA at twenty-five (25) feet from the source. If the device is located within a structure on the property, the measurement shall be made at distances as close to twenty-five (25) feet from the device as possible. The noise level at any point outside of the property plane shall not exceed eighty-five (85) dBA. 71. CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT PLAN SHEET: Prior to the issuance of any permits, the Applicant shall submit a construction management plan sheet (full-size) within the plan set that shall incorporate at a minimum the Earth Movement Plan, Project Schedule, site security fencing, employee parking, construction staging area, materials storage area(s), concrete washout(s) and proposed outhouse location(s). 72. WVSD (West Valley Sanitation District): Sanitary sewer laterals are televised by West Valley Sanitation District and approved by the Town of Los Gatos before they are used. A Sanitary Sewer Clean -out is required for each property at the property line, or at a location specified by the Town. 73. SANITARY SEWER BACKWATER VALVE: Drainage piping serving fixtures which have flood level rims less than twelve (12) inches (304.8 mm) above the elevation of the next upstream manhole and/or flushing inlet cover at the public or private sewer system serving such drainage piping shall be protected from backflow of sewage by installing an approved type backwater valve. Fixtures above such elevation shall not discharge through the backwater valve, unless first approved by the Building Official. The Town shall not incur any liability or responsibility for damage resulting from a sewer overflow where the property owner or other person has failed to install a backwater valve as defined in the Uniform Plumbing Code adopted by the Town and maintain such device in a functional operation condition. Evidence of West Sanitation District's decision on whether a backwater device is needed shall be provided prior to the issuance of a building permit. 74. BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES (BMPs): The Applicant is responsible for ensuring that all contractors are aware of all storm water quality measures and that such measures are implemented. Best Management Practices (BMPs) shall be maintained and be placed for all areas that have been graded or disturbed and for all material, equipment and/or operations that need protection. Removal of BMPs (temporary removal during construction activities) shall be replaced at the end of each working day. Failure to comply with the construction BMP will result in the issuance of correction notices, citations, or stop work orders. 75. SITE DESIGN MEASURES: All projects shall incorporate the following measures: a. Protect sensitive areas and minimize changes to the natural topography. b. Minimize impervious surface areas. c. Direct roof downspouts to vegetated areas. d. Use permeable pavement surfaces on the driveway, at a minimum. e. Use landscaping to treat stormwater. 76. EROSION CONTROL: Interim and final erosion control plans shall be prepared and submitted to the Engineering Division of the Parks and Public Works Department. A maximum of two (2) weeks is allowed between clearing of an area and stabilizing/building on an area if grading is allowed during the rainy season. Interim erosion control measures, to be carried out during construction and before installation of the final landscaping, shall be included. Interim erosion control method shall include, but are not limited to: silt fences, fiber rolls (with locations and details), erosion control blankets, Town standard seeding specification, filter berms, check dams, retention basins, etc. Provide erosion control measures as needed to protect downstream water quality during winter months. The Town of Los Gatos Engineering Division of the Parks and Public Works Department and the Building Department will conduct periodic NPDES inspections of the site throughout the recognized storm season to verify compliance with the Construction General Permit and Stormwater ordinances and regulations. 77. DUST CONTROL: Blowing dust shall be reduced by timing construction activities so that paving and building construction begin as soon as possible after completion of grading, and by landscaping disturbed soils as soon as possible. Further, water trucks shall be present and in use at the construction site. All portions of the site subject to blowing dust shall be watered as often as deemed necessary by the Town, or a minimum of three (3) times daily, or apply (non -toxic) soil stabilizers on all unpaved access roads, parking areas, and staging areas at construction sites in order to insure proper control of blowing dust for the duration of the project. Watering on public streets shall not occur. Streets shall be cleaned by street sweepers or by hand as often as deemed necessary by the Town Engineer, or at least once a day. Watering associated with on -site construction activity shall take place between the hours of 8 a.m. and 5 p.m. and shall include at least one (1) late -afternoon watering to minimize the effects of blowing dust. All public streets soiled or littered due to this construction activity shall be cleaned and swept on a daily basis during the workweek to the satisfaction of the Town. Demolition or earthwork activities shall be halted when wind speeds (instantaneous gusts) exceed twenty-five (25) miles per hour (MPH). All trucks hauling soil, sand, or other loose debris shall be covered. 78. CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES: All construction shall conform to the latest requirements of the CASQA Stormwater Best Management Practices Handbooks for Construction Activities and New Development and Redevelopment, the Town's grading and erosion control ordinance, and other generally accepted engineering practices for erosion control as required by the Town Engineer when undertaking construction activities. 79. SITE DRAINAGE: Rainwater leaders shall be discharged to splash blocks. No through curb drains will be allowed. Any storm drain inlets (public or private) directly connected to public storm system shall be stenciled/signed with appropriate "NO DUMPING - Flows to Bay" NPDES required language. On -site drainage systems for all projects shall include one of the alternatives included in section C.3.i of the Municipal Regional NPDES Permit. These include storm water reuse via cisterns or rain barrels, directing runoff from impervious surfaces to vegetated areas and use of permeable surfaces. If dry wells are to be used they shall be placed a minimum of ten (10) feet from the adjacent property line and/or right-of-way. No improvements shall obstruct or divert runoff to the detriment of an adjacent, downstream or down slope property. 80. SILT AND MUD IN PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY: It is the responsibility of Contractor and homeowner to make sure that all dirt tracked into the public right-of-way is cleaned up on a daily basis. Mud, silt, concrete and other construction debris SHALL NOT be washed into the Town's storm drains. 81. GOOD HOUSEKEEPING: Good housekeeping practices shall be observed at all times during the course of construction. All construction shall be diligently supervised by a person or persons authorized to do so at all times during working hours. The Applicant's representative in charge shall be at the job site during all working hours. Failure to maintain the public right-of-way according to this condition may result in penalties and/or the Town performing the required maintenance at the Applicant's expense. 82. COVERED TRUCKS: All trucks transporting materials to and from the site shall be covered. TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE SANTA CLARA COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT: 83. WILDLAND-URBAN INTERFACE: This project is located within the designated Wildland- Urban Interface Fire Area. The building construction shall comply with the provisions of Section R327 of the California Residential Code or the California Building Code (CBC) Chapter 7A., as applicable. Note that vegetation clearance shall be in compliance with CBC Section 701A.3.2.4 prior to project final approval. Check with the Planning Department for related landscape plan requirements. 84. FIRE SPRINKLERS REQUIRED: An automatic residential fire -sprinkler system shall be installed in one -and two-family dwellings as follows: In all new one -and two-family dwellings and in existing one -and two-family dwellings when additions are made that increase the building area to more than 3,600 square feet. Exception: A one-time addition to an existing building that does not total more than 1,000 square feet of building area. Note: The owner(s), occupant(s), and any contractor(s) or subcontractor(s) are responsible for consulting with the water purveyor of record in order to determine if any modifications or upgrade of the existing water service is required. A State of California licensed (C-16) Fire Protection Contractor shall submit plans, calculations, a completed permit application, and appropriate fees to this department for review and approval prior to beginning their work. CFC Section 313.2 as adopted and amended by LGTC. 85. CONSTRUCTION FIRE SAFETY: All construction sites must comply with applicable provisions of the CFC Chapter 33 and our Standard Detail and Specification SI-7. Provide appropriate notations on subsequent plan submittals, as appropriate to the project. CFC Chapter 33. 86. ADDRESS IDENTIFICATION: New and existing buildings shall have approved address numbers, building numbers or approved building identification placed in a position that is plainly legible and visible from the street or road fronting the property. These numbers shall contrast with their background. Where required by the fire code official, address numbers shall be provided in additional approved locations to facilitate emergency response. Address numbers shall be Arabic numbers or alphabetical letters. Numbers shall be a minimum of 4 inches (101.6 mm) high with a minimum stroke width of 0.5 inch (12.7 mm). Where access is by means of a private road and the building cannot be viewed from the public way, a monument, pole or other signs or means shall be used to identify the structure. Address numbers shall be maintained. CFC Section 505.1 N:\DEV\CONDITIONS\2017\Alpine 26.docx RECEIVE JUL 20ZO17 July 20, 2017 '111 -TOWN OF LOS GATOS PLANNING DIVISION Dear Los Gatos Planning Commission and Community, My wife Susan and I are sure you've heard many stories of families with the same dreams of living in the Town of Los Gatos. Although our `story' may look like a long read from this letter, I'll provide you with the succinct point and then you can read our family story below. My wife and I moved to Los Gatos 25 years ago and this is where we want to stay through our retirement and the birth of our first grandchild early next year. Los Gatos is the only home and neighborhood our daughters have ever known. They have been shaped by the community here and have chosen to make Los Gatos their home as they start to raise their own families. Our story probably mirrors many of the young Los Gatos families living an exciting life at the epicenter of Silicon Valley; experiencing the greatest innovation era of all time. Our California journey began in 1988 with a technology company relocating our family with an 8-month-old daughter in -toe from Connecticut. We toured many South Bay areas looking for the right sense of community, schools, great weather and vibrant culture for our new home, and instantly connected and fell in love with the beauty and serenity of Los Gatos. At that early stage of our family life, we couldn't afford to buy a home in Los Gatos, but we never gave up on our dream. Finally in 1992, as a young family, with two beautiful daughters and our oldest entering kindergarten, we moved to a rental property on Cherry Blossom Lane in the Manor. As we settled into our life in Los Gatos we realized the town we had hoped to call home was indeed the best place to raise our young family and four years later we were lucky enough to be able to afford our very first Los Gatos home on Johnson Avenue. Our girls Alexandra and Jordan attended Louise Van Meter Elementary School. We especially loved the insane yearly Halloween parade of 'Trick or Treaters' on Johnson Avenue. The neighborhood came alive with everyone trying to show their spirit of the holiday with the scariest house. In 2001, with teenage girls and now lots of nieces and nephews who moved nearby, we needed a bigger home. We were able to purchase a beautiful family home at 38 Alpine Avenue that was a special place for us. Not only did we get to stay in the same neighborhood and continue to build on the friendships we had made there, but it also became a place for the Los Gatos middle and high school kids to hang out. There were always large groups of kids at our house either hanging out in the swimming pool or enjoying out 'rec room' on the ground floor. There was never a dull moment and made for many enduring memories. We called 38 Alpine Avenue home for 15 years and loved every minute of our time there as a family. Recently, our oldest daughter Alexandra and her husband purchased a home in Los Gatos not far from where she grew up and they are pregnant with our first grandchild. We've always been a family that loved and respected nature and grew to love it more with the setting of our house on Alpine Avenue that was surrounded by beautiful native trees and a creek running behind our house. As someone who truly cares about the planet, our environment and the beauty and power of nature, I was fortunate enough to be asked to join the Board of Directors at WildLifeDirect with Dr. Richard Leakey as our Chairman. Dr. Leaky authored the book "The Sixth Extinction: Patterns of Life and the Future of Humankind" where he predicted the devastating impacts of climate change. In 2012, following my unwavering commitment to doing what I could to do my part to ensure a future of sustainability and a nurturing of our beautiful planet, I accepted a two-year executive position at SolarCity - an Elon Musk company - where we lead a solar revolution radically reducing fossil fuel electricity consumption and thereby eliminating half a million metric tons of CO2 from the atmosphere. I then was asked to return in 2016 to help orchestrate the Tesla acquisition of SolarCity, integrate the companies and run the Tesla Energy Sales and Customer Experience groups. I'm sure you're wondering why all this matters in the context of this letter. Several years ago we purchased a lot on 26 Alpine Avenue to build our retirement home, right next door to 38 Alpine Avenue, where we lived for 15 years. We thoughtfully selected 26 Alpine Avenue because of the beautiful hillside, abundant trees, creek and serene setting. We partnered with local Architect, Tom Sloan, who helped establish the Los Gatos Hillside Development Standards and Guidelines, and long-time local Los Gatos Builder, Dave Zicovich. We set out with a vision to create a home that would follow the natural beauty of the hillside, preserve the tranquil habitat, produce a low environmental footprint, enhance the community and create a Zen influenced environment for my wife, our daughters and grandchildren. We are proud of our unique, custom, "Zen" home, it's a design that fulfills our lofty goals and brings value to the Los Gatos community. The new home design literally grows out from the natural contours of the property with no over -bearing and intrusive retaining walls or destructive grading. The design of the house and surrounding landscape allows us to retain over 80% of the trees which was critically important to us and we will preserve the natural beauty of the property. We are grateful for having spent a quarter of a century living and contributing to our home community of Los Gatos. Our family continues to experience the "magic" of Los Gatos and we are excited to build our retirement home in a place that has provided us with a unique lifestyle, a balance of nature and nurture and an opportunity for our expanding family to call home for generations to come. Thank you for listening to our story, Toby and Susan Corey iiA METRO DESIGN GROUP Corey Residence 26 Alpine Avenue RECEIVED JUL 2U201/ TOWN OF LOS GATOS PLANNING DIVISION Project Description The site is located within the R-1-20 zoning district with steep topographic conditions and an average slope of 41% and extensive tree coverage. The site includes several natural features such as a seasonal water course, steep grades, multiple mature trees and 2 street frontages on Alpine Ave. as well as Jackson St. These distinctive site conditions within an established neighborhood dictate that design opportunities for the residence are limited. The home is designed on two levels that assimilate into the natural terrain and natural contours of the site. Grading for the home is limited essentially within the footprint thus enabling the residence to appear as if it has grown out from the site rather than placed upon a level graded surface that would result in an un-natural contrived appearance. The siting of the home preserves the most healthy and valuable trees in site that result in framing the residence from Alpine and screening the residence from Jackson Street. The proposed residence is sited well below the neighbor located uphill and has an excessive setback distance to the downhill neighbor. This sensitivity to providing visual privacy benefits the owner as well as the neighbors. The Architectural style uses contemporary forms that respect the characteristics of the site rather than traditional home styles that are usual constructed on flatter lots. The building materials and architectural elements harmonized together with contrasting Tight and shadow to emulate the site natural features. The floor area for the proposed residence is of modest size relative to other surrounding homes and includes private outdoor living space that integrates directly to the habitable spaces. The home incorporates minimal outdoor spaces into the architecture of the residence, leaving the remaining site in its natural state. The inhabitants of the home are treated to a lifestyle that brings in the surrounding natural setting inside the home's primary living spaces. Daylighting into the residence along with privacy is provided in portions of the home using a highly insulated, fire-resistant product called Kalwafl. Natural sunlight into the main living space is only provided by the south facing widows located within a light well. 1475 SOUTH BASCOM, SUITE 208, CAMPBELL, CA 95008 • TELEPHONE (408) 871-1071 • FAX {408) 871-1071 Sustainable Design Elements and Green Building Products used in the design include but are not limited to the following: • Pre -wired for integrated PV Solar Panels and electric vehicles • Green — Eco Roofing system • Recycled and reclaimed Building Materials • Precast Concrete Permeable Eco Pavers • Radiant Floor Heating System • Kalwall — translucent wall panels • Compliance with Residential Design Guidelines 1.) The Allowable Floor Area for the residence is 2,614 sq.ft. and the proposed Floor Area for the residence 1,993 sq.ft.. The allowable Garage area is 735 sq.ft. and the proposed Garage is 558 sq.ft. A substantial portion of additional floor area for this residence is integrated with a subterranean "cellar" level, daylighting on the downhill side of the residence. 2.) The Street Presence of this home skillfully integrates the floor area into a contemporary massing which steps gracefully with the natural contours of the site. An eclectic and varied neighborhood architectural character and setback distance from the street along with an atypical site necessitates a creative architectural solution. The proposed house uses diminishing building height to emulate greater setbacks from the street and a low profile, deeply articulated facade to relate to the natural setting. 3.) The Form and Mass of the proposed residence are intended to relate and augment the dramatic site conditions then to maintaining a typical neighborhood street edge. The entrance was comprehended as negative space between the forms of the building rather than prominent and conspicuous architectural elements 4.) The Garage is also designed to be conspicuous; deploying a surface that matches the typical buildings siding and no distinctive door frame, the garage virtually vanishes as an architectural element. Additionally it is positioned along with a short driveway to take advantage of the difficult site conditions while providing safe ingress and egress. The project intends to take advantage of existing curb cuts in the street and reuse the existing driveway a safe way to for guests to park on site. On -street parking along Alpine Avenue's narrow roadway in not considered as a safe option. 5.) The intent for the Site Development is to leave much of the existing natural landscape in place. The residence is sited to complement and maintain the wooded character of the existing site to the greatest extent possible was seen as being sensitive to the existing neighbor's concerns. 6.) The Building Design Principles that were used for this project did not assimilate the incongruence of architectural styles and elements established along Alpine Avenue. Rather, as discussed above, it was the outcome of the complex site conditions and passion to undertake a sustainable design that lead to the parti pr/s. A compilation flat roof planes at varying heights have been designed to support solar panels and a vegetated eco-green roofing system that mutually work together to create a sustainable and environmentally friendly residence. Exterior building materials were selected solely because they were high quality, sustainable, green, maintenance free, and fire -resistive. The proposed residence combines timeless building materials and modern structural technology and design into a naturalist's aesthetic. The primary building finish is the exterior cedar siding. Using an ancient Japanese woodworking technique called "Show Sugi Ban", the cedar siding planks are hydrated then charred on the exterior surface, transforming it to a dark gray glaze that in turn creates a fireproof finish. The dark coloring will reduce the visual impact of the house and recede into the forested background. Additionally, rustic horizontally stacked stone walls will accent and bifurcate the massing elements while diminishing the bulk and mass of the residence. The jagged texture of the stone walls will appear darker because of the shadows being cast upon itself. The transparency of the glass guard railings are intended to recede and accentuate the modulating wall and roof plains. Deep overhanging balcony and roof planes were designed to cast shadows upon the walls that ultimately fuse the entire residence into the forested context. Windows and Doors are not designed as simple openings in wall planes but rather as transparent and absent wall planes that provide the occupant and observer an ability to communicate the exterior and interior environments. The taller wall and roof planes highlight this inside to outside relationship and create a living environment that is highly interconnected to the natural environment that surrounds the residence. The taller walls in the main living space are also required to allow south facing natural light to enter the home above the retaining walls located on the uphill side of the residence. The roof surface will be a combination of an eco- green roof and metal standing seam. The metal standing seam will be a dark bronze color that matches the metal dad door and window frames and balconies support elements. The Eco Green Roof is proposed on an uphill portion of the residence that is closest to the large surrounding oak trees that loom nearby and is likely to continuously shed their leaves. The eco-green roof system requires less maintenance and is more sustainable, is a tremendous insulator of air and sound, reduces storm water runoff and associated pollutants and reduces the"heat-island" effects and provides an agreeable aesthetic surface facing the neighbors. Together, both roof systems will harmonize with the natural environment and provide the uphill neighbor with a direct view over the top if the new residence. The driveway will be paved with a permeable pre -cast concrete paver system that is 100% permeable, allowing storm water to dispose into the natural aquifer and capture pollutants and heavy metal particulates from runoff into the local streams. Compliance with the Guidelines & Standards for Land Use Near Streams • Unlike neighboring properties that gain access to the site over an ephemeral / seasonal watercourse located along the easterly side of Jackson Street, this site is accessed from Alpine Avenue. Also unlike the neighboring sites, there will be no disturbance or diversion of the watercourse proposed along the Jackson Street for this project. A Soil Stability Analyses was completed for this property that addresses both the steep site gradients as well as the hydrological conditions such as a potential of liquidation during a seismic event. The Geotechnical Report indicates "the proposed construction will improve the site stability". • The Guidelines & Standards for Land Use Near Streams section II.(E) indicates that a Soils Stability setback of 20 to 25 feet plus an additional 5 feet due to the site being larger than 10,000 sq.ft. Due to the source of the water -course being storm water run-off, it could be categorized as an "ephemeral stream", A required setback of 25 to 30 feet from the "top of bank" is required. As designed, the project has a cantilevered overhang 26'-10" away from the top of creek bank with the nearest foundation element setback 30 feet from the top of creek bank. • The closest manmade disturbance proposed will be setback greater than the minimum 25 feet from the top of the bank. • Storm drainage outfall is located up hill and a great distance away from the top of back to ensure that any storm water that should be deposited into the stream will be treated from several source controls that have been integrated into the Grading and Drainage Plans for the project. Compliance with a portion of the Hillside Design Standards & Guidelines • Justification for Development outside the LRDA —With the vast majority of the site having a slope of over 30 percent, the solution for this dwelling required a non- traditional solution in order to fulfill the "vision" of the HDS&G. Siting the entire development within the LRDA was not going to be possible and meet the owner's modest necessities for a home. The largest areas of the LRDA are located within the setback areas leaving 2 small and irregular areas to locate the proposed development. The architect sought to find the best location that could create an outstanding project meeting the intent of the HDS&G by 1.) Maintaining the open wooded character of the site, 2.) Harmonize with the natural setting, 3.) Conserve the natural landforms, 4.) Preserve the natural habitat, and 5.) Protect the view -sheds. The one area that provides the most level surface to construct a residence is located at lowest portion of the site and along the northwesterly property line. This location would create privacy impacts between the neighbors living at 27 Jackson Street and the owners of the proposed residence. This level area on the site has several oak trees that could provide screening from the alternate building site and would otherwise need to be removed in order to construct a new residence. It is also an area disposed to to flooding. The best and preferred alternate location to site the residence has an LRDA extending the entire length of the Alpine Road frontage, providing a gently sloping frontage facing Alpine Avenue that follows most moderate contours of the site. The proposed driveway enters the site straight into the Garage providing safe and level egress and ingress and requiring virtually no amount of grading. While a portion of the existing house is located outside the LRDA, an observer on Alpine Road views the residence as being within an LRDA due to the residence's complete integration into the hillside; following the natural contours and landforms. All retaining walls are integrated into the architecture, thus rendering them imperceptible from any surrounding location thus meeting the intent of Section III of the HDS&G for Site Planning to reduce physical and visual impacts. Storm Water collected on the roof and paved surfaces are all collected at the source and directed into vegetated swales and drainage courses that have been designed to integrate into the natural contours and collect and disburse storm water uniformly into the natural aquifer. • Justification for the Main Floor plate height — relative to the immediate neighborhood. The architecture of this project is derived out the site conditions, sustainable design principles and the client's necessities. Within the significantly wooded site, natural sunlight is a limited. The orientation of the hillside dictates that the largest wall surfaces face downhill and to the north. Taller glass surfaces will provide sunlight into the residence providing daylighting and eliminating the need to supplement with electrical lighting. The taller window and door planes achieve a deeper, highly interconnected relationship between the interior living environment and the encompassing, natural environment. The taller walls in the main living space are a required to allow south facing natural light to enter the home above the retaining walls located on the uphill side of the residence. Natural sunlight is required to provide a healthy interior environment and provide for the health and welfare of the residents. There is a long list of health benefits that come from natural sunlight that includes killing bacteria, lowering cholesterol and one's blood pressure and building the immune system. The project has traded the removal of an urban forest to provide outdoor space with a smaller footprint and smaller outdoor areas that have been integrated into the architecture of the home. Professionally Submitted, Tom Sloan AIA Principal Architect CIG CANNON DESIGN GROUI August 29, 2016 Ms. Joycelyn Puga Community Development Department Town of Los Gatos 110 E. Main Street Los Gatos, CA 95031 RE: 26 Alpine Avenue ARCHITECTURE PLANNING URBAN DESIGN Dear Jocelyn: I reviewed the drawings, and visited the site. I previously reviewed a proposed new home on this site in 2006. My comments and recommendations are as follows: Neighborhood Context The site faces both Alpine Avenue and Jackson Street on steeply sloped site with heavy tree cover. The adjacent context on Alpine Avenue is very eclectic with both smaller homes and much larger homes in close proximity. Photographs of the neighborhood are shown on the following page. SIT 7 700 LARKSPUR LANDING CIRCLE . SUITE 199 . LARKSPUR . CA . 94939 TEL:415.331.3795 CDGPLAN@PACBE L L, NET 26 Alpine Avenue Design Review Comments August 29, 2016 Page 2 View to the site on Jackson Street mrnediately adjacent home to the felt on Alpine Avenue Nearby home on Alpine Avenue Nearby home on Alpine Avenue View to the site on Alpine Avenue Immediately adjacent home to the right on Alpine Avenue .„4. I� �� Illfillll4�lfliill�l(Ill ful ill lll1�� Ili 1�� I Nearby horn(' CANNON DESIGN GROUP 700 LARKSPUR LANDING CIRCLE . SUITE 199 . LARKSPUR . CA . 94939 26 Alpine Avenue Design Review Comments August 29, 2016 Page 3 Issues and Recommendations The proposed house is contemporary in architectural style and very well designed with a great deal of articulation and detail appropriate to its style - see Alpine Avenue sketch and other proposed elevations below,. Proposed Rear Elevation Proposed Left Side Elevation Proposed Right Side Elevation CANNON DESIGN GROUP 700 LARKSPUR LANDING CIRCLE . SUITE 199 . LARKSPUR . CA . 94939 26 Alpine Avenue Design Review Comments August 29, 2016 Page 4 While the architectural style is different from others in the immediate neighborhood, the scale of the home related to Alpine Avenue and other nearby homes would be complementary to the streetscape. The substantial tree cover will largely obscure views to the house from Jackson Street and will filter views at the Alpine Avenue facade - see context aerial photo below. My only recommendation would be to consider eliminating the circular driveway element at the front of the house. Although the vestiges of a driveway currently exist in that location, the circular driveway would be inconsistent with Residential Design Guide- line 2.4.4. Landscaping in lieu of paving unless absolutely necessary for egress CANNON DESIGN GROUP 700 LARKSPUR LANDING CIRCLE . SUITE 199 . LARKSPUR . CA . 94939 26 Alpine Avenue Design Review Comments August 29, 2016 Page 5 I have no other recommendations for changes. Jocelyn, please let me know if you have any questions, or if there are other issues that I did not address. Sincerely, CANNON DESIGN GROUP Larry L. Cannon CANNON DESIGN GROUP 700 LARKSPUR LANDING CIRCLE . SUITE 199 . LARKSPUR , CA . 94939 This Page Intentionally Left Blank Page 11 artion ianborapeo - arboriot 4§erluitre5 Gareth Jones, Certified Arborist WE-8379A ArtisanLandEscapes@Gmail.Com 12150 HWY 9, Boulder Creek, Ca. 95006 (408) 674-7856 PRELIMINARY TREE SURVEY PLAN & TREE PRESERVATION REPORT Rev. 2 FOR 26 ALPINE AVE, TOWN OF LOS GATOS June 26, 2016 Attn: Susan B. Corey 26 Alpine Avenue Los Gatos, Ca. 95030 Note: This is revision 2 of this arborist report, Dated 6/6/2017. Revised to address Jocelyn Puga's review letter dated May 25th, 2017. Table of Contents Table of Contents 1 Assignment 2 Methods 2 Purpose 3 General Site Observations 3 General Suggestions for proposed development. 4 Tree specific and Proposed Development Specific Notes: 5 Appendix A- Complete Tree Survey Table 11 Explanation of Tree Table Columns 11 Appendix B — City of Los Gatos Tree Protection Standards 16 Appendix C - Glossary of Terms 17 Appendix D- Works Cited 19 Appendix E - Certification of Performance 20 Appendix F - Tree Survey Drawing and Tree protection Plan Drtisan ltanbocapeo - 2rbort5st gmbirrit Gareth Jones, Certified Arborist WE-8379A — ArtisanLandEscapes@Gmail.com (408) 674-7856 12150 HWY 9, Boulder Creek, Ca. 95006 :1411: ITS Page 12 Assignment Mrs. Corey contacted me on June 15`h, 2016 and asked if 1 would like to perform the arborist reporting duties for a proposed development of new Hillside property in Los Gatos. I reviewed the town code and agreed to begin by performing a preliminary Tree Survey Plan & Tree Preservation Report. Sec. 29.10.1000. New property development. (a) A tree survey shall be conducted prior to submittal of any development application proposing the removal of or impact to one or more protected trees. The development application shall include a Tree Survey Plan and Tree Preservation Report based on this survey. The tree survey inventory numbers shall correspond to a numbered metal tag placed on each tree on site during the tree survey. The tree survey plan shall be prepared by a certified or consulting arborist, and shall include the following information: (1) Location of all existing trees on the property as described in section 29.10.0995; (2) Identify all trees that could potentially be affected by the project (directly or indirectly -immediately or in long term), such as upslope grading or compaction outside of the dripline; (3) Notation of all trees classified as protected trees; (4) In addition, for trees four (4) inches in diameter or larger, the plan shall specify the precise location of the trunk and crown spread, and the species, size (diameter, height, crown spread) and condition of the tree. (b) The tree survey plan shall be reviewed by the Town's consulting arborist who shall, after making a field visit to the property, indicate in writing or as shown on approved plans, which trees are recommended for preservation (based on a retention rating of high/moderate/low) using, as a minimum, the Standards of Review set forth in section 29.10.0990. This plan shall be made part of the staff report to the Town reviewing body upon its consideration of the application for new property development Methods On June 16th I visited the site and visually inspected the crowns, branches, trunks, root collars, above ground roots, cavities, and site conditions of all the trees 4" and larger in diameter at breast height (DBH) within. 15' of the PL. I nailed a numbered aluminum tag to each tree, measured the DBI3 (Diameter at breast height) with a loggers/diameter tape, measured the approximate height and width of canopy with a distance laser, and recorded species, standard condition ratings for various parts of the tree and tree specific artisan 'iLanbgeapeg - arbarizt iberbites Gareth Jones, Certified Arborist WE-8379A — ArtisanLandEscapes@Gmail.com (408) 674-7856 12150 HWY 9, Boulder Creek, Ca. 95006 Page 13 notes for trees potentially affected by the proposed project. I compiled this information in this report and locations on the recent topographical survey attached. I also rated them per "The Guide for Plant Appraisal (9th edition, 2000)" and assigned rough values based on the Trunk Formula Method described therein using values given by the "Supplemental Species Classification and Group Assignment -A Regional Supplement to the CTLA guide for plant appraisal, 9th ed. (WCISA, 2004) " . I performed a rough test of reasonableness by checking that the total of the tree values (approximately 300k) against the property value. Trees have been known to contribute up to 20% of the value to a property, so this does not seem totally out of line. I also reviewed the latest proposed plans "Proposed Site Plan — Corey Residence" by Metro Design Group, dated 7-28-16. See Attached Tree Preservation Plan for this. Purpose The purpose of this survey is to satisfy section 29.10.0990 for new Hillside Development and more specifically for review by the towns consulting arborist who shall, after making a field visit to the property, indicate in writing or as shown on approved plans, which trees are recommended for preservation (based on a retention rating of high/moderatellow) using, as a minimum, the Standards of Review set forth in section 29.10.0990. General Site Observations 1. The Site is a densely wooded hillside falling into a riparian corridor with a nice mix of a typical young native forest, an understory of coast live oak, bay and buckeye overarched by some larger live oaks and quite a few fine young valley oaks climbing up from the creek. 2. There is a pocket of Phytopthera ramorum ( The not always lethal fungus responsible for sudden oak death ) that apparently came through the front of the property (Live oaks #6 & #8) show signs of healed over P.ramorum cambial dieback at the base) and down into the riparian corridor (Quercus agrifolia #36 has an active canker) and perhaps some of the surrounding bays as indicated by some leaf spots) and will now work its way upstream from the base of the hill. This could be slowed by removing some of the small bays in between infected trees and those that are apparently free of disease. (Tedmund J. Swiecki, 2008) Srtisan Lanb5rapr5 - Zrbori. t'erbice5 Gareth Jones, Certified Arborist WE-8379A — ArtisanLandEscapes@Gmail.com (408) 674-7856 12150 HWY 9, Boulder Creek, Ca. 95006 Page 14 General Suggestions for proposed development. 1. Tree Protection Distances: Predicting where the actual roots are is very difficult but some standard distances may be applied for design consideration. The ideal protection zone would be 1 foot of tree protection for every inch of diameter, thus a 12" DBH tree would have a 12' diameter protection zone around it. If absolutely necessary one can encroach up to 3x the DBH on one side and 5 x the DBH on several sides and retain most of the structural roots. These exceptions will allow a younger and more vigorous tree to survive construction but care must be taken with older or weaker trees as they are much more sensitive to change. These distances are shown on the Tree Protection Plan as the 3 dotted circles surrounding trees that are affected by construction. 2. Driveway Paving: Pervious pavers are shown on the proposed plan. The concept of pervious pavers is good, however in actuality they are often specified for installation over very deep sections (2-4') of impermeable class 2 base rock compacted to 95%. This totally negates any water passing through and requires excavating to a great depth, effectively destroying any existing roots. It also requires an even deeper retaining structure. By using a more traditional impervious paving such as concrete one typically only needs 4" of base excavation, little or no edge retention and one might even retain the existing base section and place any new required base on top of this. This of course is up to the client, architect and engineer but I thought it was an observation worth noting as trees #2, 3, 6 & 8 will have large roots in the area to be repaved. #2 may have large structural roots, and #6 & 8 are older and more sensitive to change and must be given every advantage possible. grtis'an 'ItanDscapess - Clirboriot a,erbire. Gareth Jones, Certified Arborist WE-8379A — ArtisanLandEscapes@Gmail.com (408) 674-7856 12150 HWY 9, Boulder Creek, Ca. 95006 Page 5 3. Fencing/Retaining wall structure: I would, as shown on the attached tree protection plan, place all of the rest of the site behind a tree protection fence. I don't know what kind of retaining structure will be specified on the uphill side, but perhaps a gunnite style wall might be considered, if feasible, in order to maintain as much of the root system for trees 6, 7 & 9 as possible. Normal retaining walls require 3-4' of over excavation, construction of forms and placement of drainage structures. Gunnite walls can have bored footings, and insulation/drainage structures placed directly against the dirt and then gunnite applied directly to this, requiring almost no over excavation, I am not an engineer or class A contractor so I don't know if this is feasible, or perhaps if smaller over excavations are possible but merely as suggestions toward using a retaining wall system that minimizes the intrusion into the tree protection zone and delicate surface root mat of 6, 8 and 9 who are all mature, and therefore more sensitive to change. 4. All excavation that is within the defined tree protection zone (Inches DBH in feet) as shown on the attached tree protection plan shall be performed under the the supervision of a certified arborist. This is pretty much all the demolition of the driveway and the excavation of the new driveway and retaining structures, including the back of the proposed residence. All roots over 3/4" should receive clean cuts with a pruning saw. 5. Tree protection will be according to Los Gatos Tree Protection Standards. See Appendix B. 6. The viewshed would not be affected from either Alpine or Jackson. The percent of tree cover would still be more than approximately triple any of the neighboring parcels. The net reduction in canopy area for the proposed removals would be less than %13 (2,027sq ft116,238sq ft) sq ft from cad) and the site would still have 71 percent canopy cover. Tree specific and Proposed Development Specific Notes: All trees and their ratings and protected status are given in appendix A. #1- (Retain and Protect) This young coast live oak is nice but its proximity to the existing paving edge will create problems for it. The designers have changed the driveway to give this tree adequate room to flourish in the long run, Demolition of the existing driveway should be done with care next 55rtioan 1anbscapes - arberia Oerbiceg Gareth Jones, Certified Arborist WE-8379A — ArtisanLandEscapes@Gmail.com (408) 674-7856 12150 HWY 9, Boulder Creek, Ca. 95006 Page 16 to this tree. Backfill after removal of driveway should be uncompacted. #2- (Retain and Protect) Big blue gum mostly located on neighboring parcel. Some care should be taken protecting roots in paving operations and protection of the root zone during construction. #3- (Retain and Protect) Nice Live oak, lopsided from being under previously removed eucalyptus but should fill in nicely over time. Again root zone needs protection during construction. #4- (Retain and Protect) Same as 3. #5-NA (no tag in numbered set) General comment for # 6, 8 &9; Once oaks reach maturity, they have less tolerance for changes in root area and canopy. They can survive off of reserves for a while but then several years later succumb to whatever pest or fungus is around as they cannot mount a sufficient defense. These trees just went through a historic drought, survived sudden oak death attacks, which reduce cambium and nutrient supply up and down the trunk, have perhaps a quarter of the canopy a wild oak would have, have either recent development or hardscape on one side and so they are most likely pretty fairly low on reserves. You must be very sensitive to development and the root zones must be preserved as much as practically possible in order for them to make it through the next 3 years following construction. #6- (Retain and Protect) Nice established coast live oak that appears to have survived and healed over a virulent attack of P. ramorum judging by the scarring and healing over at the base. Has some scaffold cavities and a pretty sparse canopy.. #7- (Proposed remove) A black acacia that in addition to being a virulent pest is well situated so as to broadcast seed into the waterway, has a codominant trunk with extreme angle and should be removed from an environmental and structural standpoint. Suggest removal then immediately panting the stump with more than 55% glyphosate in order to kill the root system. Dispose of chips separately at the county waste facility so as to not spread seeds everywhere. #8- (Retain and Protect) Another nice established live oak that appears to have nicely healed over from a P. ramorum lower cambial die -back and has a little fuller canopy than #6 also with some artician Zanbgtatteg • 2rboriot berbitro Gareth Jones, Certified Arborist WE-8379A --ArtisanLandEscapes@Gmail.com (408) 674-7856 12150 H W Y 9, Boulder Creek, Ca. 95006 1' .,r7 cavities in the main scaffold. This also needs fierce protection of the root zone in order to keep it from the tipping point as it, #6 Sr. #9 are a focal centerpieces. #9- (Retain and Protect) An established older live oak straddling the property that needs as much protection of the root zone during construction as possible. The adjacent side has been fairly recently disturbed with hardscape & landscaping. See general notes on proposed site development for ideas on maximizing protected root zone to give this old veteran and focal centerpiece a fighting chance. #10-(Proposed remove) A coast live oak shown below to the right who appears to have lost most of its main trunk a while back. There a large oozing pocket of rot working its way down the middle of the trunk from the break. It retained a side branch and has regrown a small canopy from epicormic sprouts that have a larger possibility of failure down the line once they eventually support a full canopy. This coupled with the large rotting canker working its way down the broken trunk indicate poor chances of it eventually recovering into a structurally sound, established tree. I believe the proposed plans call for its removal and while it does have some wildlife value its removal would not alter the overall canopy view shed from either adjacent streets or houses. #11- (Proposed Remove) An ancient peach? Shown above to the left, that is rather long in the tooth Srtiffan ianbstapes - &Wrist t erlaite8 Gareth Jones, Certified Arborist WE-8379A — ArtisanLandEscapes@Gmail.com (408) 674-7856 12150 HWY 9, Boulder Creek, Ca. 95006 Page 8 and lost most of its scaffold branches in the last drought. # 12- (Proposed Remove) Another Oak that would need to be removed in order to build the presently proposed residence. It has a fairly nice canopy although all of the tree is leaning to one side of the trunk which would indicate a higher propensity to fall over in a saturation event and it is over the house electrical drop for the neighbors. The top of this oaks canopy is just barely visible from Jackson St. and fairly visible from Alpine but there are trees behind it to protect the green viewshed, were it to be removed. Trees #13 through #31 would be unaffected by the development proposed in the reviewed plans, Excepting #s 21, 22 and 26 who may lose some root mass to grading and excavation. They are fairly young and vigorous and should be ok but care needs to be taken with clean root pruning cuts. #32- (Proposed Remove) An 8" bay tree shown below to the left, of little use except as a vector for P. ramorum. #33- (Proposed Remove) A 24" D13H live oak seen below in the middle that appears to have lost its trunk from about 6' up some time ago. The previous normal branch structure has been replaced with epieormic sprouts forming a very small canopy (for DBH) that will never form solid unions with trunk. The tree has little long term value as it will eventually suffer failure of its improperly joined codominant scaffold limbs as they gain leaf mass and be eroded from within by cavities from the old wound underneath. #34- (Proposed Remove) A small Oak with heavy lean shown below on the right. Z1rtigan Ianbgtapeg - Sarbori t §§erltiteo Gareth Jones, Certified Arborist WE-8379A — ArtisanLandEscapes@Ginaii.com (408) 674-7856 12150 HWY 9, Boulder Creek, Ca. 95006 Page 19 #35- (Proposed Remove) A small buckeye being choked out by the ascending forest. #36- (Proposed Remove) A small oak with an oozing, active P. ramorum canker. #37- (Proposed Remove) A small bay with what may be P. ramorum spots on leaves but is sure to be infected due to proximity to #36 and should be removed before it broadcasts more active inoculum from high in the canopy. #38-through #56 would be unaffected by the development proposed in the reviewed plans. Rrtioan 3tanbtcapeg - arharist'erliicrs Gareth Jones, Certified Arborist WE-8379A — ArtisanLandEseapes@Gmail.com (408) 674-7856 12150 HWY 9, Boulder Creek, Ca. 95006 Paze I10 #57-(Proposed Remove) A leaning bay with codominant stems and poor structure. #58-(Proposed Remove) An ancient Mexican elderberry with a half dead and decayed trunk that is being choked out by the ascendant forest. artioan Lanborapro - SEIrborisst berbites Gareth Jones, Certified Arborist WE-8379A — ArtisanLandEscapes@Gmail.com (408) 674-7856 12150 HWY 9, Boulder Creek, Ca. 95006 Paize j11 Appendix A- Complete Tree Survey Table Explanation of Tree Table Columns • ID##: Number on aluminum tag on tree and number on attached plans. • Species: Scientific name for the tree. • Affected By Proposed Construction: Yes or no to whether the tree will be affected by the proposed construction. • Proposed Action: Removal or protection of specified tree required for implementation of proposed construction. • Protected Tree: Y=yes or N=no whether it is a protected tree according to LG code. • Approximate Height in feet: Distance from ground to top of canopy, measured with a distance laser. • Diameter at Breast Height in ". Diameter of the trunk measured at 4.5' above the ground level in inches. • Canopy Spread in FT. Distance across canopy at widest point in feet. • Species Rating: A value assigned by the regional plant appraisal committee of the value of a particular type of tree in this particular region. For example a native, long lived tree =I or 90% and a short lived invasive pest would be a 5 or 10%. • Condition Rating %: An overall condition rating which is an average of the Roots, Trunk, Scaffold Branches, Branches and Twigs, and Foliage and bud ratings. • Roots %: Condition of the roots expressed as a percentage. • Trunk %: Condition of the trunk expressed as a percentage. • Scaffold Branches %: Condition of the scaffold branches expressed as a percentage. • Foliage and buds %: Condition of the Foliage and buds expressed as a percentage. artisan lantiocapeo - Mrborist iserttites Gareth Jones, Certified Arborist WE-8379A — ArtisanLandEscapes@Gmail.com (408) 674-7856 12150 HWY 9, Boulder Creek, Ca. 95006 Page 112 • Location Rating %: An average of site, contribution and placement ratings. • Site %: Relative value of property based on location. • Contribution %: How much the tree adds to the site. • Placement %: The trees placement. • Adjusted Trunk Area in Sq. ": The area in square inches of the trunk. Because value is not related to size directly after a certain size it shifts to a quadratic equation to more accurately capture real value increase with size. • Cost per square inch of trunk: A value based on local nursery and installation costs. The values were obtained from the regional plant appraisal committee. • The basic tree cost: Is the cost per square inch multiplied by the adjusted trunk area for a perfect tree in the perfect location. This value is then multiplied by the location, condition and species modifiers to obtain the Estimated Tree Value. • Estimated Tree Value: The estimated value of the tree as appraised per "The Guide for Plant Appraisal (9th edition, 2000)" using the Trunk Formula Method described therein Some values were obtained from the "Supplemental Species Classification and Group Assignment -A Regional Supplement to the CTLA guide for plant appraisal, 9th ed. (WCISA, 2004) " • artisan 'lanbotaprt - arboris't icrtiirett Gareth Jones, Certified Arborist WE-8379A—ArtisanLandEscapes@Gmail.com (408) 674-7856 12150 HWY 9, Boulder Creek, Ca. 95006 12150 HWY 9, Boulder Creek, Ca 95006 Gareth Jones, Certified Arborist WE-8379A — ArtisanLandEscapes@GmaiLcom (408) 674-7856 5 ' 7 0 QP _sr !Li s c •.. is !+ 2 - • r 4 Branches and Twigs `,6 1 c7 Location Rating % 1 Adjusted Trunk Area sq." cost per squat° inch of trunii Estimated Tree Value 1 Q.sercus ag*rftc!ia Y Retain 4 Prolecl Y 25 35 10 1 87 75 90 90 90 90 68 90 85 30 79 45.5 $3,589 51.910 2 Eu tgdeas g'abu'us Y Re1asn & Protect Y 55,, 35 32 5 71 75 55 85 75 75 85 90' 75 90 788 36.4 $8,635 51,730 3 Querc:.rs egrstolsa Y Reta r $ Protect Y 45 40 18 1 85 85 85 85 85 90 90 90 90 254 45.5 51 1,562 $8.000 4 O. .e'rcua agr{fctsa -Y 35 Retain Protect .Y 45 X), 18 1 85 85 85 85 85 85 90 90 96 90 2541 45.5 $11.562 $8.000 ., 5 'i+Eol Used _ _ 516400 M 6 Q:M MuS a gptc!'a Y Retell Protect Y 45 45 26 1 81 85 75 75 85 75 93� 90 95 95 531 45.5 524,124 ,, 7 Acacia aT►e'aox n^. n Y Rerrove Y 30 12 4 69 ' 35 50 75 65 90_ 67 90 55 55 113 45 5 $5.139 $710 8 Q./emus astr1 a Y Retry' & Protect Y 45 30 30 1 88' 85i 90` 90 90 .. 85 93 913 95 95 707 45.5 $32.117 523,700 516,300 9 Q;seicus ag•rfoha Y Retain & Protect Y 45 40 26 1 79 56 90 75 85 80 95 95 95 95 531 45.5. 524.124 10 0.reross aar5ra!sa Y 'Remove �Y 25 30 14` 1 66 45 50� 65, 75, 85 88�90 90 85 154 45.5 $6.994 S3.670 t t Prunus spp Y Remove Y 20 5 6 4 73 85 85 65 c51 65 53 90 20 50 28, 77 52.177 3250 12 Over s agrvc'ta Y Remove . Y 30 30 le 18 1 83 80 75 85 85 90 87 90' 85 85 254 45 5 S11.562 57,500 13 Eucalyptus t, 17ur;.ts N Retain 8 Protect Y 60 40 45 5 86 85 85 90 85 90 75 90 85 50 1353 36 4 $49.200 S3,170 14 0,:ercus argnfcl*a N Reta'n 8 Protect Y 45 30 12 1 91 90 95 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 113 45 5 55,139 53,790 15 0ugetcus an11c to N Retain 8.Protect . Y 50 35 15 1 89 90 65 90 90 90 90 90. 90 90 177 45 5 58,029 55,800 16 Urnt?e1';tlana catdo n'ca N Retann 5 Protect Y 20 20 4 2 82 90 5O 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 13 77 $968 350 0 17,Q',rercu's lebsta N Retain 8 Protect Y 50 40 14 1 87 85 85 85 90 85 90 90 90 90 154 77 $11.853 38.400 18 (3 lereu5 agrefe7"a N Retain 5 Protect Y 35 30 14 1 83 90 75 85 85 80 90 90 90 90 154 45.5 $6.994 $4.700 19 Prunt;S srp N Retain 8 ProtectY 20 10 6 4 70� 85 ' 50_65 65 85 77 90 90 50 28 77 $2.17 7 SW!, 54,010 20 limb cal4crn'c N Retain 8 Protect Y 35 25 11, 2 87 75 90 0 99 90 9090, 90 90 95 77 57,318 21 Qu cus lottata Y Retain & Prated Y 45 35 12 1 90 90: 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 113 77 58.709 $6,300 84A00 22 0 enr us arito!ia Y Retain & P►alecl Y 50 30 13 ' 1 90 90 90 80 90 90 90 90 90 90 133 45 5 56.031 90056 aJ -pap Japinog `6 AMH OS I Z I Gareth Jones, Certified Arborist WE-8379A — ArtisanLandEscapes@Gmail.com (408) 674-7856 in 13 [Affected by proposed Construction Proposed action ai W -ro 13 41, a:_ Appronirrtate Height in FT anopy Spread in FT Diameter at Breast Height in " ISpecies Rating ca c W c �. B r 1 U o d qN cr (I4W n .17L — Scaffold Branches ay. Branches ark Twigs Foliage ard buds ph Lactation Rating % n e7 - r? .o U o E 4/1i ti Adtusted Trunk Area sq." 1 ,cost per square inch 01 trunk Basic Tres Cost Estimated Tree Value 23 Ouercus agritolia N Retain & Protect Y 25 15 7 1 88 85 85 90 90 90 88, 90 85 90 38 45.5 $1,749 $1,220 24 Ouercus agrifolla N Retain & Protect Y 20 15 6 1 85 90 80 85 85 85 87 90 85 85 28 45.5 $1.285, $850 25 QLiera,s lobate 'N Retain 8 Protect Y 50 55 24 1 89, 90 85 90 90 90 93 90 95 95 452 77 $34,834 $26,000 26 Umbeffutaria californica Y Retain & Protect Y 25 30 12 2 72 50 40 90 90 90 47 90 25 25 113 77 $8,709 $1 1,562 $2,050 $6,100 27 Qtiercjs agrifalia N Retain & Protect Y 45 45 18 1 80 85 80 65, 75 85 73 85 85 50 254 45.5 28 Aesculus cililomica N Retain & Protect Y 25 15 10 2 84 90 70 70.. 85 90 87' 90 85 85 79 45.5 $3.569 S11820 29 Llmbeflutaria califomica N Retain & Protect Y 35. 20 12 2 78T90 50 70, 80 9047„90 25 25 113 77 $8,709 $2,220 30 Ouercus agrifolin N Retain 8 Protect Y 40 30 12 1 88 85 85 90 90 90, 90 90 90 90 113 45.5 $5.139 $3,660 31 Not Used 32 Umbeflularia cahfo•nica Y Remove Y 35 20 8 2 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 50 77 $3,870 $2,190 33 Ouercus agrdalia Y Remove Y 40 30 24 1 79 90 35 45 90 90 90 90 90 90 452 45.5 $20,555 $13,200 34 Ouercus agritolra Y Remove Y 25 15 11 1 88 85 85 93 90' 90 90 90 90 90 95 45.5 $4.318 $3,080 35 Aescutus calilomica Y Remove Y 15 10 7 2 77 80 45 65 85 90 90 90 90 90 38 45.5 51,749 8850' 36VOuercus agritofia Y Remove Y 38 15 10 1 89 85 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 79 45.5 $3,569" $2,570 37 Umbetlularia californica Y Remove Y 30 10 8 2 90 90 90 93 90 90 90 90 90 90 S0 77 $3,870 52,190 38 Umb€flutaria calitornica N Retain & Protect Y 40� 15 7� 2 90 94 93 75' 90 90 92 90 95 90 38 77 $2.963 $1,710 $4.640 39 Aescutus catitomica N Retain 8 Protect Y 40 30 15 2 90 95 85 85 90 90, 92 90 95 90 177 45.5; $8,029 40 Aescufus calitar ica N Retain & Protect Y 25 10 8 2 87 90 75 90 90 40 77 90 50 90 50 45.5 $2,284 $1,070 41 Umbellufaria cali1ornica N Retain & Protect Y 404' 25 14 2 75 85 80 65 65 80 87 90 75 95 154 77 $1 1,853 95,390 42 Ouercus agrdalia N Retain & Protect Y 35 20 8 1 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 50 45.5 $2.284 $1,660 43 Ouercus agritolia N Retain & Protect Y 39 20 9 1 90 90 90 90 90 93 90 90 90 90 64 45.5 $2.891 $2,110 44 Ouercus agritofia N Retain & Protect Y 40 20 9 1 89 90 85 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 64 45.5 $2.891 $2,080 $3,160 45 Umbellutaria californica N Retain & Protect V 35 15 10 2 83 85 75 85 85 85 90 90 90 90 79 77 $6.048 90056 *RD `31031;3 1-9p199E1 6 AMH OS IZ I Gareth Jones. Certified Arborist WE-8379A — ArtisanLandEscapes@Gmail.com (408) 674-7856 artisan LanhOtape5 - Zirhorist*erbium M ,r7 u Aliec'.ed Dy proposea Consuuc!iorj Proposed action m '.D rti m 5 pproximata Height in FT 1 w }" g Diameter zit Breast Height in r_ -�. u rCondition Rating % 1 °Q t" . r.' '� 3 y� 4+ C kirarches and Tr»{i I V.4, L7 ;a rya :Location Rating ° 1 .Q G ,o F I)"' Adjusted Trunk Area sq." c o o e� a-,. a 47 U ¥ cus Estimated Tree Value 46 Quercus aaritclia N Retain & Protect V 40 30 11 1 93 85 95 95 95 95 90 90 90 90 95 45 5 S4.318 53,250' 47 Nereus aprilctia N Retain 8 Protect Y 45 30 11 1 95 95 93 95 95 95 90 90 90 90 95 45 5 54.318 $3,320 46 Prunus spe N Retain & Protect v 25 10 10 4+,72 85 CO 80 65 65 55' 93 25 50 79 , 56.048 5720 49 Aescutus cal,fo sca N Retain & Protect e 20 35 10 2 85 85 85 85 35 85 90 90 90 90 79 45 5 53,569 $1.910 50 Aescu!us cahtormca Y Retain & Protect 'f 30 35 24 2p 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 452 45 5 520.555 311.700 51 Cluercus 19t99a N Retain 8 Protect Y 35 40 10 1 78 60 80 9Ct 80 90 GO 90 95� 85 254 77 519,594 312,400 54,510 52 Quercus agrdclra N Retain & Protect Y 35 35 13 1 89 90 95 90 85 95 93 90 95 95 133 45 5 36.031 53_u beiutana catiinrni N Retain & Protect �Y 35 30 72 2 85 80 85 85 85 90 90 90 95 85 380 77 529271 $15.700 54 Quercus fotiata ;Dead; N Retain & Protect iY 25 0 24 1 0 0 0 01 04 0' 72 90 75 30 452 77 534.834 $01 55 Cuercus agrrtcha 'N Retain & Protect Y 40 20 13 1 85 35 95 65 85 85 90 90 90 90 133 45 5 39.031 54.150 555 Aescjius calitormca N Retain & Protect Y 25 35 12 2 85 85 85 85 65 85 90 90 90 90 113.-45 5 _5.139 52,750 57 11mb autana cairfo ntca Y Remove Y 30 30 20 2 32 85 65 75 85 90 83 90 75 85 314 77 $24.191 $11,800 58 S,trtucus mexcana Y R.,trove Y 20 35 6 4 45 35 15 35 55 65 73 90 65 65 28 45 5._ $ 265 5130 Page 116 Appendix B — City of Los Gatos Tree Protection Standards Sec. 29.10.1005. Protection of trees during construction. (a) Protective tree fencing shall specify the following: (I) Size and materials. Six (6) foot high chain link fencing, mounted on two-inch diameter galvanized iron posts, shall be driven into the ground to a depth of at least two (2) feet at no more than 10-foot spacing. For paving area that will not be demolished and when stipulated in a tree preservation plan, posts may be supported by a concrete base. (2) Area type to be fenced. Type I: Enclosure with chain link fencing of either the entire dripline area or at the tree protection zone (TPZ), when specified by a certified or consulting arborist. Type II: Enclosure for street trees located in a planter strip: chain link fence around the entire planter strip to the outer branches. Type III: Protection for a tree located in a small planter cutout only (such as downtown): orange plastic fencing shall be wrapped around the trunk from the ground to the first branch with 2- inch wooden boards bound securely on the outside. Caution shall be used to avoid damaging any bark or branches. (3) Duration of Type I, II, III fencing. Fencing shall be erected before demolition, grading or construction permits are issued and remain in place until the work is completed. Contractor shall first obtain the approval of the project arborist on record prior to removing a tree protection fence. (4) Warning sign. Each tree fence shall have prominently displayed an 8.5 x 11-inch sign stating: "Warning Tree Protection Zone -this fence shall not be removed and is subject to penalty according to Town Code 29.10.1025". (b) All persons, shall comply with the following precautions: (1) Prior to the commencement of construction, install the fence at the dripline, or tree protection zone (TPZ) when specified in an approved arborist report, around any tree and/or vegetation to be retained which could be affected by the construction and prohibit any storage of construction materials or other materials, equipment cleaning, or parking of vehicles within the TPZ. The dripline shall not be altered in any way so as to increase the encroachment of the construction. (2) Prohibit all construction activities within the TPZ, including but not limited to: excavation, grading, drainage and leveling within the dripline of the tree unless approved by the Director. (3) Prohibit disposal or depositing of oil, gasoline, chemicals or other harmful materials within the dripline of or in drainage channels, swales or areas that may lead to the dripline of a protected tree. (4) Prohibit the attachment of wires, signs or ropes to any protected tree. (5) Design utility services and irrigation lines to be located outside of the dripline when feasible. (6) Retain the services of a certified or consulting arborist who shall serve as the project arborist for periodic monitoring of the project site and the health of those trees to be preserved. The project arborist shall be present whenever activities occur which may pose a potential threat to the health of the trees to be preserved and shall document all site visits. (7) The Director and project arborist shall be notified of any damage that occurs to a protected tree during construction so that proper treatment may be administered. (Ord. No. 2114, §§ I, II, 8-4-03) artisan 1[anDricapeo - arborist inrbitto Gareth Jones, Certified Arborist WE-8379A — ArtisanLandEscapes@Gmail.com (408) 674-7856 12150 HWY 9, Boulder Creek, Ca. 95006 Palle 117 Appendix C - Glossary of Terms • Butt : The base of a trees trunk. • Canker : A discrete area of dead or malformed bark caused by a pathogen. • Canopy: Extent of the outer layer of leaves of a tree or group of trees. • Cavity : A hole or space within that is significantly different than the surrounding tissue, usually hollow or filled with decayed matter. • Codominant : 2 or more main stems (or "leaders") that are about the same diameter and emerge from the same location on the main trunk and have the same diameter and canopy. These form little to no connective tissue and are significantly weaker than a connection involving a bigger (dominant) and smaller branch. • Conk : Another term for a fruiting body. • Crown : Upper part of a tree, measured from the lowest branch, including all the branches and foliage. • Epicormic Growth : Epicormic growth is a shoots growing from an epicormic bud, which lies latent underneath the bark of a trunk, stem, or branch of a plant. These are normally suppressed by plant hormones but after a topping cut they sprout to form the new canopy. Their connections are only bark deep and attached to an open decay column at the topping cut thus forming branches prone to failure in the future. • Fruiting Body : The fruitbody is part of the sexual phase of a fungal life cycle, with the rest of the life cycle being characterized by vegetativemycelial growth and asexual spore production. • included Bark : A codominant union that grows together, so the tree forms bark inside the space where trunks should be connected, greatly weakening the union. ZIrtisan Lanbscapeg - arborigt *erbices Gareth Jones, Certified Arborist WE-8379A — ArtisanLandEscapes@Gmail.com (408) 674-7856 12150 HWY 9, Boulder Creek, Ca. 95006 Page 118 • Phytopthera ramorum: A fungal disease responsible for sudden oak death. Forms necrotic pockets of cracked and oozing bark at the base of the tree. • Probe : A thin metal rod for poking into soft wood. • Resistograph : is a trademark characterizing electronic high -resolution needle drill resistance measurement devices, developed by Frank Rinn (since 1986 in Heidelberg/Germany), for inspecting trees and timber. • Scaffold Branches : The main branches that come off the trunk. • Root collars : The slight bulge and slight change in bark that separates the trunk from the roots in a tree. • Topping cuts : A cut that does not leave a side branch at least 'A to 213rds diameter of the removed branch so the tree will be forced to grow epicormic sprouts as the remaining branch cannot absorb the plant growth regulation hormones. • Trunk: A trees central superstructure or the main wooden axis of a tree. artisan itanb5rapecs - Ztrbari t 6erbice>x Gareth Jones, Certified Arborist WE-8379A — ArtisanLandEscapes@Gmail.com (408) 674-7856 12150 HWY 9, Boulder Creek, Ca. 95006 Page 119 Appendix D - Works Cited Appraisers, C. o. (2000). Guide for Plant Appraisal. (9th. ed.). Champaign, Illinois: International Society of Arboriculture. Dunster, J. A., Smiley, T., Matheny, N., & Lilly, S. (2013). Tree Risk Assessment Manual. Champaign, IL.: International Society of Arboriculture. ISA. (2011). Glossary ofArboricultural Terms. Champaign, IL: International Society of Arboriculture. Smiley, E. M., & Lilly, N. (2011). Best Management Practices: Tree Risk Assessment. Champaign, IL: International Society of Arboriculture. Tedmund J. Swiecki, E. A. (2008). Increasing Distance from California Bay reduces the risk and severity of Phytopthera ramorum canker in coast live oak. Proceedings of the Sudden Oak Death Third Science Symposium (pp. 181-194). Albany: Pacific Southwest Research Station: USDA Forest Service. Publ. artioan 3Lanbgtapeg - arborigt g'crbice% Gareth Jones, Certified Arborist WE-8379A — ArtisantandEseapes@Gmail.com (408) 674-7856 12150 HWY 9, Boulder Creek, Ca. 95006 Page 120 Appendix E - Certification of Performance I, Gareth B. Jones, certify: • That I personally inspected the trees and property referred to in this report, and have stated my findings accurately. • The scope of the evaluation is stated in the report section `Assignment' • I have no current or future interest in the vegetation or the property that is the subject of this report or in the work suggested in my report. • I have no personal interest or bias with respect to the parties involved. • The analysis, opinions and conclusions stated herein are my own and were developed and according to commonly accepted Arboricultural practices. • Nobody else provided significant professional assistance to myself. • My compensation is not contingent upon the reporting of a predetermined conclusion that favors the cause of the client or any other party, nor upon the results of the assessment, the attainment of stipulated results, or the occurrence of any other subsequent events • I am an International Society of Arboriculture Certified Arborist. I have been so since 2008. I have been involved with the practice of Arboriculture and the care and study of trees since 2001. Gareth B. Jones ISA Certified Arborist WE-8379A rtisan '1Lanb capeo - arborigt berbitni Gareth Jones, Certified Arborist WE-8379A — ArtisanLandEscapes@Gmail.corn (408) 674-7856 12150 HWY 9, Boulder Creek, Ca. 95006 • TREE PROTECTION PLAN LEGEND: STANDARD TREE PROTECTION ZONE (1" Dia =1' TPZ Rad.) 3 X DBH & 5X DBH ENCROACHMENT LIMITS -0- SUGGESTED TREE PROTECTION ZONE FENCING SUGGESTED TREE PROTECTION ZONE APPROXIMATE EDGE OF CANOPY SUGGEST REMOVE EXISTING TREE ry� ,/'GRAPHIC SCALE 20 20 ( IN FEET) inch = 24tl OZES - n REES # 5 & # 31 OO NOT EXISI�I PROTECTION PLAN WAS - -- -.-1PREPAREDBYGARETHJONES, / A CERTIFIED ARBORIST " r - *WE-8379A IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS SET DOWN IN 'TOWN OF LOS GATOS TREE PRESERVATION STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS' AND IS PART OF THE 'PRELIMfNARY ARBORISTS REPORT FOR 26 ALPINE DRIVE' AND SHOULD BE USED AS A PART OF THE ENTIRE REPORT. LOCATIONS OF MOST TREES WERE TAKEN 17 FROM THE DRAWING 'TOPOGRAPHIC AND BOUNDARY SURVEY, July 2016 ' BY WESTFALL ENGINEERING CANOPIES WERE ESTIMATED 6 BY SIGHT AND USING A LASER 75 DISTANCE METER. ALL DBH'S WERE DERIVED FROM HAND •••,_55 MEASURED CIRCUMFERENCES TAKEN BY THE ARBORIST.. J " TP-0.1 DRIGawli WO. uw.n+nn This Page Intentionally Left Blank Deborah Ellis, MS Consulting Arborist & Horticulturist Service since 1984 Jocelyn Puga Community Development Department, Town of Los Gatos 110 E. Main Street, Los Gatos, CA 95030 November 8, 2016 26 Alpine Avenue, Review of Arborist Report & Tree Protection Plan Dear Jocelyn: I have reviewed the following documents that you sent me last week relative to the above project: 1. Preliminary Tree Survey Plan & Tree Preservation Report for 26 Alpine Avenue. June 26, 2016. Twenty pages. Gareth Jones, Artisan Landscapes. Note that this is an updated version of document #4 below although both documents have the same date and no reference to revision. 2. Tree Protection plan sheet TP-0.1. Ibid. July 10, 2016. 3. Tree Survey plan sheet TS-0.1. Ibid. In addition, I previously reviewed these documents and commented to you by email (due to deficiencies in these documents) on September 14, 2016 and November 2, 2016: 4. Preliminary Tree Survey Plan & Arborist's Notes for 26 Alpine Ave., Town of Los Gatos. June 26, 2016. Five pages. Gareth Jones, Artisan Landscapes. 5. Tree Survey plan sheet TS-0.1. Ibid. July 10, 2016 Comments: 1. The second June 26, 2016 report (the revised 20 page report) is much better than the original 5 page report. I did not go to the site to check any of the trees, but the report looks reasonable and the recommendations seem reasonable. The author did include estimated tree values in the second report, which I recommended in my September 14 email, and also recommendations for tree protection. 2. It would be helpful if the tree protection plan sheets were included in the report as well as attached as separate documents. Separate sheets like this tend to get Lost. 3. Trees missing on the plan sheets: PO Box 3714, Saratoga, CA 95070. 408-725-1357. decah€pacbell.net. http://www.decoh.com. 26 Alpine Ave. Arborist Report Review. November 8, 2016. Page 1 of 2 EXHIBIT 9 Deborah Ellis, MS Consulting Arborist & Horticulturist Service since 1984 • Tree numbers 5 and 31 were not used (I discovered this in the text of the reportj. It would be helpful to include a note about this on the plan sheets. • Tree numbers 30 and 40 are not shown on the plans. In the text of the report I read that these trees are far enough away from proposed improvements so that they will not be affected. These tree trunk locations and numbers should be included on the plan sheets in any case, so that we can be sure of this. ****************************** I certify that the information contained in this report is correct to the best of my knowledge, and that this report was prepared in good faith. Thank you for the opportunity to provide service again. Please call me if you have questions or if I can be of further assistance. fiL Deborah Ellis, MS. Consulting Arborist & Horticulturist Certified Professional Horticulturist #30022 ASCA Registered Consulting Arborist #305 I.S.A. Board Certified Master Arborist WE-457B I.S.A. Tree Risk Assessment Qualified PO Box 3714, Saratoga, CA 95070. 408-725-1357. decah@pacbelLnet. http://www.decah.com. 26 Alpine Ave, Arborist Report Review. November 8, 2016. Page 2 of 2 Page 11 artis'an lanbotapeo - Irboriot Oerbiceo Response letter to Deborah Ellis' comments letter dated November 8th, 2016. FOR 26 ALPINE AVE, TOWN OF LOS GATOS January 17, 2017 Attn: Jocelyn Puga Community Development Department, Town of Los Gatos 110 E. Main Street Los Gatos, Ca. 95030 Dear Jocelyn, Please find corrections and clarifications following in response to Deborah Ellis' comments in her letter dated November 8, 2016. I have used her numbering and sometimes added a sentence fragment to aid in following along. In response to her first 3 items, I added a current date and revision 1 to all documents and drawings. In response to her Comments: section, 2. `° It would be helpful if the tree protection plan sheets were included..." The tree survey and protection plan sheets are part of the same pdf and scaled as Tabloid in order to be folded and stapled in the back of the report. Printing them as letter may make for difficult reading. 3. "Trees missing on the plan sheets:" "Tree numbers 5 & 31 were not used..." I added note to this effect on plan sheets with rev cloud. "Tree numbers 30&40 are not shown" #30 was there but #40 I had failed to copy from my original field drawings & notes. I added 40 and rev. clouded both on tree survey and tree protection plan. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions or concerns, Sincerely, (408) 674-7856 artioan Lanbocapes - CArborist berbices% Gareth Jones, Certified Arborist WE-8379A — ArtisanLandEscapes@Gmail.com (408) 674-7856 12150 HWY 9, Boulder Creek, Ca. 95006 1E '-E-IIEIT 1 fi This Page Intentionally Left Blank ECE VED AUG 032016 TOWN OF LOS GATOS COREY RESIDENCE 26 ALPINE AVE LOS GATOS, CA 95030 FINISH BUILDING MATERIALS : ROOFING GREEN ROOF SYSTEM: GAF 'EVERGUARD ® EXTENSIVE GARDEN ROOF TPO', CLASS "A" BY "HYDROTECH USA" -MANSARD BROWN COLOR EXTERIOR WINDOWS/DOORS, RAILINGS, EXTERIOR WALLS METAL CLAD ALUMINUM WOOD CLAD / ALUMINUM CLAD 'DARK BRONZE' ANODIZED ALUMINUM EXTERIOR WALL FINISH & GARAGE DOORS: GREY WOOD SIDING - 8" EXPOSURE RETAINING WALLS, PLANTERS : GREY POURED IN PLACE CONCRETE METRO DESIGN GROUP ROOF FASCIA CUSTOM 24 GA. PRE -PAINTED 'GALVALUME' METAL EXTERIOR KALWALL PANEL SYSTEM: TRANSLUCENT PANELS EXTERIOR WALL FINISH : 'COOPER STONE' - CHESTNUT LEDGESTONE - NATURAL THIN STONE VENEER DRIVEWAY, WALKWAYS AND PATIOS PERMEABLE PAVERS ECO-FRIENDLY 'PERMEABLE MISSION PAVEMENT' - PREMIUM PETALUMA COLOR BY 'BASALITE' 1475 S BASCOM AVE SUITE 208 • CAMPBELL, CA 95008 - (408) 871-1071 PH • (408) 871-107 jT 1 I7-28-16 This Page Intentionally Left Blank Errata Sheet Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration 26 Alpine Avenue Architecture and Site Application S-16-052 Mitigated Negative Declaration ND-17-001 Changes and clarifications to the Initial Study (IS) text and Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND), as outlined below, were initiated by staff subsequent to publication of the IS to add additional information received after the release of the IS. None of the text changes result in new significant environmental impacts not previously disclosed in the IS. The following changes should be made in the IS and MND dated June 2017 (added text is underlined and deleted text is shown as stam): CUL-1: Archaeological Resources and Human Remains. MND, page 6, and i5, pages 43 and 44, Mitigation Measure CUL-1: Prior to the issuance of any building permits or grading permits, the applicant shall submit to the satisfaction of the Director of Community Development, evidence that the following measures have been completed or have been incorporated into the construction documents. In order to avoid impacts to archaeological resources, tribal cultural resources and human remains during project implementation, the measures outlined below shall be implemented. With the incorporation of the following measures, significant impacts on these species would be avoided. a. In the event that archaeological traces or tribal cultural resources are encountered, all construction within a 50-meter radius of the find will be halted, the Community Development Director will be notified, and an archaeologist will be retained to examine the find and make appropriate recommendations. b. !f human remains are discovered, the Santa Clara County Coroner will be notified. The Coroner will determine whether or not the remains are Native American. if the Coroner determines the remains are not subject to his authority, he will notify the Native American Heritage Commission, who shall attempt to identify descendants of the deceased Native Americans. c. If the Community Development Director finds that the archaeological find or tribal cultural resource is not a significant resource, work will resume only after the submittal EXIEBIT 1 2 of a preliminary archaeological report and after provisions for reburial and ongoing monitoring are accepted. Provisions for identifying descendants of a deceased Native American and for reburial will follow the protocol set forth in CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5( e). If the site is found to be a significant archaeological site, a mitigation program will be prepared and submitted to the Community Development Director for consideration and approval, in conformance with the protocol set forth in Public Resources Code Section 21083.2. A final report shall be prepared when a find is determined to be a significant archaeological site, and/or when Native American remains are found on the site. The final report will include background information on the completed work, a description and list of identified resources, the disposition and curation of these resources, any testing, other recovered information, and conclusions. Tribal Cultural Resources IS, page 64, paragraphs 1 and 2: Tribal cultural resources as defined in Public Resources Code section 5020.1(k) have not been previously identified within the project site and are considered unlikely to be present given the sloped topography of the site. The project site is undeveloped and does not contain any existing structures or extant historical tribal cultural resources with the potential for inclusion on the California Register of Historical Resources or a local register. Furthermore, the Town has not been contacted by any tribes who are traditionally and culturally affiliated with the geographic area of the Town pursuant to Public Resources Code section 21080.3 subd. (b). Mitigation Measure CUL-1 has been included with the project to ensure construction activities are halted if archaeological resources, tribal cultural resources, or human remains are discovered. As such, potential impacts on historic tribal cultural resources are considered less than significant. 2 26 Alpine Avenue S-16-052 ND-17-001 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program SUMMARY OF MITIGATION MEASURES AND MONITORING PROGRAM FOR THE 26 ALPINE AVENUE PROJECT Mitigation Measures AQ-1: BAAQMD-Recommended Basic Construction Mitigation Measures To limit the project's construction -related dust and criteria pollutant emissions, the following BAAQMD- recommended Basic Construction Mitigation Measures shall be included in the project's grading plan, building plans, and contract specifications: a. All exposed surfaces (e.g., parking areas, staging areas, soil piles, graded areas, and unpaved access roads) shall be watered two times per day. Recycled water should be used wherever feasible. b, Alt haul trucks transporting soil, sand, or other loose material off -site shall be covered. c. All visible mud or dirt track -out onto adjacent public roads shall be removed using wet power vacuum street sweepers at least once per day. The use of dry power sweeping is prohibited. d. All vehicle speeds on unpaved roads shall be limited to 15 mph. e. All roadways, driveways, and sidewalks to be paved shall be completed as soon as passible. f. Idling times shall be minimized either by shutting equipment off when not in use or reducing the maximum idling time to five minutes (as required by the California airborne toxics control measure Title 13, Section 2485 of California Code of Regulations [CCR]). Clear signage shall be provided for construction workers at all access points. g. All construction equipment shall be maintained and properly tuned in accordance with manufacturer's Party Responsible for Implementation Project Engineer and Construction Contractor Implementation Trigger/Timing Prior to issuance of grading permit / during construction Agency Responsible for Monitoring Planning Division, Community Development Department (CDD) Monitoring Compliance Timing and Record Monitoring (Name/Date) Review Initials: specifications; Date: monitor prior to and during regular inspections Initials: Date: Initials: Date: Initials: Date: EXWWIBIT 1 3 26 Alpine Avenue S-16-052 ND-17-001 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program SUMMARY OF MITIGATION MEASURES AND MONITORING PROGRAM FOR THE 26 ALPINE AVENUE PROJECT (CONTINUED) specifications. All equipment shall be checked by a certified mechanic and determined to be running in proper condition prior to operation. h. Post a publicly visible sign with the telephone number and person to contact at the Town regarding dust complaints. This person shall respond and take corrective action within 48 hours. The BAAQMD's phone number shall also be visible to ensure compliance with applicable regulations. BIO-1: Special -status and Migratory Bird Species Prior to the issuance of any grading permits or improvements plans, the applicant shall submit to the satisfaction of the Director of Community Development, evidence that the following measures have been completed or have been incorporated into the construction documents. a. The removal of trees and shrubs shall be minimized to the extent feasible. b. If tree removal, pruning, grubbing and demolition activities arc necessary, such activities shall be conducted outside of the breeding season (i.e., between September 1 and January 31), to avoid impacts to nesting birds. c. If tree removal, pruning, grubbing and demolition activities are scheduled to commence during the bird breeding season i.e., between February 1 and August 31), a preconstruction survey shall be conducted by a qualified biologist no more than two weeks prior to the initiation of work. The preconstruction survey shall include the project footprint and up to a 300-foot buffer, access and sight - lines permitting. If no active nests of migratory birds are found, work may proceed without restriction and no further measures are necessary. If work is delayed more than two weeks, the preconstruction survey shall be repeated, if determined necessary by the project biologist. Project applicant - contracted biologist Prior to the issuance of grading permits or improvement plans. Planning Division, Community Development Department (CDD) Prior to issuance of grading permit, ensure measures are incorporated into project plans; monitor during construction Initials: Date: Initials: Date: Initials: Date: Initials: Date: 2 26 Alpine Avenue S-16-052 ND-17-001 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program SUMMARY OF MITIGATION MEASURES AND MONITORING PROGRAM FOR THE 26 ALPINE AVENUE PROJECT (CONTINUED) d. If active nests (i.e. nests with eggs or young birds present, or hosting an actively breeding adult pair) of special -status or migratory birds are detected, the project biologist shall designate non -disturbance buffers at a distance sufficient to minimize disturbance based on the nest location, topography, cover, species, and the type/duration of potential disturbance. No work shall occur within the non -disturbance buffers until the young have fledged, as determined by a qualified biologist. The appropriate buffer size shall be determined in cooperation with the CDFW and/or the USFWS. If, despite the establishment of a non -disturbance buffer it is determined that project activities are resulting in nest disturbance, work shall cease immediately and the CDFW and the USFWS shall be contacted for further guidance. c. If project activities must occur within the non - disturbance buffer, a qualified biologist shall monitor the nest(s) to document that no take of the nest (i.e., nest failure) will result. If it is determined that project activities are resulting in nest disturbance, work shall cease immediately and the CDFW and the USFWS shall be contacted for further guidance. BIO-2 Special -status Bats Prior to the issuance of any grading permits or improvements plans, the applicant shall submit to the satisfaction of the Director of Community Development, evidence that the following measures have been completed or have been incorporated into the construction documents. a. Prior to the removal or significant pruning of trees and the demolition of buildings, a qualified bat biologist shall assess them for the potential to support roosting bats. Suitable bat roosting sites include trees with snags, rotten stumps, and decadent trees with broken limbs, exfoliating bark, cavities, and structures with cracks, joint seams and other openings to interior spaces. If there is no evidence of occupation by bats, work may proceed without further Project applicant - contracted bat -biologist Prior to the issuance of grading permits or improvement plans.. 3 Planning Division, Community Development Department (CDD) Prior to issuance of grading permit, ensure measures are incorporated into project plans; monitor during construction Initials: Date: Initials: Date: Initials: Date: Initials: Date: 26 Alpine Avenue S-16-052 ND-17-001 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program SUMMARY OF MITIGATION MEASURES AND MONITORING PROGRAM FOR THE 26 ALPINE AVENUE PROJECT (CONTINUED) action. b. If suitable roosting habitat is present, the bat biologist shall recommend appropriate measures to prevent take of bats. Such measures may include exclusion and humane eviction (see "c" below) of bats roosting within structures during seasonal periods of peak activity (e.g., February 15 - April 15, and August 15 - October 30), partial dismantling of structures to induce abandonment, or other appropriate measures. c. If bat roosts are identified on the site, the following measures shall be implemented: • If non-breeding/migratory bats are identified on the site within a tree or building that is proposed for removal, then bats shall be passively excluded from the tree or building. This is generally accomplished by opening up the roost area to allow airflow through the cavity/crevice, or installing one-way doors. The bat biologist shall confirm that the bats have been excluded from the tree or building before it can be removed. • If a maternity roost of a special -status bat species is detected, an appropriate non -disturbance buffer zone shall be established around the roost tree or building site, in consultation with the CDFW. Maternity roost sites may be demolished only when it has been determined by a qualified bat biologist that the nursery site is not occupied. Demolition of maternity roost sites may only be performed during seasonal periods of peak activity (e.g., February 15 - April 15, and August 15 - October 30). • No additional mitigation for the loss of roosting bat habitat is required. BIO-3: Tree Planting Plan Prior to the issuance of any grading permits or improvements plans, the applicant shall submit to the satisfaction of the Director of Community Development, evidence that the following measures regarding Project applicant - contracted arborist Prior to issuance of any grading permit or improvement plan. Planning Division, Community Development Department (CDD) and Parks and Public Works Prior to and during removal of and replanting of trees, and prior to and during landscaping activities. Initials: Date: Initials: Date: 4 26 Alpine Avenue S-16-052 ND-17-001 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program SUMMARY OF MITIGATION MEASURES AND MONITORING PROGRAM FOR THE 26 ALPINE AVENUE PROJECT (CONTINUED) development of a 'Free Planting Plan have been completed or have been incorporated into the construction documents. The Tree Planting Plan shall include the following: a. Removal of the 5 protected trees (all with 30-35 feet canopy diameters) will be replaced by four 24-inch box trees or two 36-inch box trees per tree removed. Replacement trees must be species from the Town of Los Gatos' approved tree species list. b. Removal of 3 riparian tree species should be mitigated by additional plantings in the project area. Planting additional trees in the riparian set back is not advised due to the heavily shaded nature of the existing canopy cover. c. Ecologically suitable native understory plants should be planted on the hillside above the riparian set back. d. All landscaping shall be done with plants that are not known to be invasive. Use a reputable nursery to source native plants that are genetically similar to those found in the Santa Cruz Mountains. lnina9s Date: Initials: Date: BIO-4: Sudden Oak Death Syndrome Project applicant - contracted arborist Prior to the issuance of any grading permits or improvements plans, the applicant shall submit to the satisfaction of the Director of Community Development, evidence that the following measures have been completed or have been incorporated into the construction documents. Prior to removal or trimming of any potentially infected tree or carrier tree species, samples will be taken by a qualified arborist and sent to a laboratory to determine the presence or absence of SODS. If a positive test result ()curs, the applicant shall immediately consult with the Oak Mortality Task Force and follow all applicable recommendations for further tree removal, trimming, disposal of vegetation, and for decontamination of equipment. Prior to issuance of any grading permit or improvement plan Planning Division, Community Development Department (CDD), and Oak Mortality Task Force Prior to and during tree removal incorporate tree testing Initials: Date: Initials: Date: Initials: Date: Initials: Date: CUL-1: Archaeological Resources and Human Remains Project applicant Prior to issuance of building permit Planning Division, Community Prior to issuance of Initials: grading permit and Date: 5 26 Alpine Avenue S-16-052 ND-17-001 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program SUMMARY OF MITIGATION MEASURES AND MONITORING PROGRAM FOR THE 26 ALPINE AVENUE PROJECT (CONTINUED) Prior to the issuance of any grading permits or improvements plans, the applicant shall submit to the satisfaction of the Director of Community Development, evidence that the following measures have been completed or have been incorporated into the construction documents. a. In the event that archaeological traces are encountered, all construction within a 50-meter radius of the find will be halted, the Community Development Director will be notified, and an archaeologist will be retained to examine the fmd and make appropriate recommendations. b. If human remains are discovered, the Santa Clara County Coroner will be notified. The Coroner will determine whether or not the remains are Native American. If the Coroner determines char the remains are not subject to his authority, he will notify the Native American Heritage Commission, who shall attempt to identify descendants of the deceased Native Americans. c. If the Community Development Director finds that the archaeological find is not a significant resource, work will resume only after the submittal of a preliminary archaeological report and after provisions for reburial and ongoing monitoring are accepted. Provisions for identifying descendants of a deceased Native American and for reburial will follow the protocol set forth in CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5( ej. If the site is found to be a significant archaeological site, a mitigation program will be prepared and submitted to the Community Development Director for consideration and approval, in conformance with the protocol set forth in Public Resources Code Section 24083.2. d. A final report shall be prepared when a fmd is determined to be a significant archaeological site, and/or when Native American remains are found on the site. The final report will include background information on the completed work, a description and list of identified resources, the disposition and curation of these resources, any testing, other recovered information, and conclusions. Development during grading Department (CDD), activities. County Coroner, and Native American Heritage Commission Initials: Date: Initials: Date: Initials: Date: 6 26 Alpine Avenue S-16-052 ND-17-001 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program SUMMARY OF MITIGATION MEASURES AND MONITORING PROGRAM FOR THE 26 ALPINE AVENUE PROJECT (CONTINUED) (i1 O-1: Geotechnical Report Recommendations. The project applicant shall implement all of the recommendations of the project geotechnical report, and any associated updates or revisions, related to site preparation and grading, foundation design, driveways, retaining walls, and drainage improvements. To ensure correct implementation, the geotechnical engineer shall review project plans and observe geotechnical-relevant aspects of proposed initial construction of roads and infrastructure. The geotechnical engineer shall submit an "as built" letter to the Director of Public Works stating that the project has been constructed in conformance with the recommendations of the geotechnical report. Project applicant Prior to issuance of building permit Planning Division, Community Development Department (CDD) and Parks and Public Works Prior to issuance of building permit, ensure designs arc implemented during construction Initial<: Date: Initials: Date: Initials: Date: Initials: Date: 1-1WQ-1: Construction Erosion Control Measures. Prior to the issuance of grading permits or improvement plans in lieu of grading permits, the applicant shall: Demonstrate to the satisfaction of the Town Engineer that the project's stormwater quality control measures, including the erosion control features described in the project's final Erosion Control Plan have been incorporated into the project design. Project applicant Prior to the issuance of grading permits Town Engineer Prior to the issuance Initials: of grading permits Date: Initials: Date: 7 This Page Intentionally Left Blank A TREE #9 Removal of additional trees Concern about root system, BOTH of our tree since it is on property line Need opinion from Consulting Arborist, not Arborist, but a Consulting Arborist Initial arborist said digging under the tree for pool will kill it (damage to root system) How will the tree be protected during construction What is the remedy if the tree dies as a result of construction (old growth Oak Tree) Why two permits for removal of trees, why the need to remove more? Barrie D. Coate and Coate, Barrie, Cert. 23535 Summit Road office: 408-353-1052 Associates Arborisi fit 897, Consulting Arborisi a237 Los Gatos, CA 95033-9307 Fax: 408-353-1238 Cert. in Horticulture, UC Santa Cniz. 1991. — ALPINE AVENUE PROPOSED RESIDENCE 26 ALPINE AVENUE Street Profile A b.l,VENUE RECEIVED NAME FROM: Bill Berridge Tree Div. Manager Certified Arborist #WE-5525 V. (408) 288-2940 F. (408) 392-9014 C. (408) 595-8455 PROPOSED RESII 26 ALPINE AVE B NOISE AND VIBRATIONS DRILLING, BLASTING, DIGGING How are they digging into the hill? Who is monitoring the noise and vibration. levels? If digging impacts our home, what is the remedy? s:n Aen 0 lempiesca.gav TOWN OF LOS G A T O S 202B GENERAL PLAN N O I$ E E L E M E N T Action NOI-7.3 Any Environmental Review document prepared for the Town for a project that identifies noise factors shall relate the noise data to the Town's Noise Ordinance to give the Planning Commission and Town Council a standard for comparison. esx1•• C VIEW The house was sold to us with a "view", the Corey's told us repeatedly that we would not see the new home at all. As you can see from the photos of the story poles, our view is being obstructed and we can see the home. Once again, we were told by Susan Corey and Micheal Riese that we would NOT see the home once it was built. They even marketed the view it in brochures, see copies of the marketing material. We asked to see the drawings of the home and was told by both Mrs. Corey and Mr. Riese that the drawings were not available, they had not begun the process. Please note, they submitted the drawings for the proposed home days after closing of 38 Alpine Ave. This is all on record. Closing of 38 Alpine Ave July 19, 2016. The drawings that I see at Los Gatos are from August 29.2016, This suggested th at jhe drawings were drawn_and approved within 1 month according of closing. clearly ,this is not possible. To_pr ve that, y husband was asked to review drawings at the Architects office in November 2016. and the drawingswere actuallyslated January 2016, seven months before we purchased the house! Clearly the Corey's chose to not properly disclose their plans, even when repeatedly asked. D ROOF AND CHIMNEY HEIGHT My husband met with the Architect in November 2016. He expressed his concern about the roof and chimney height. Neither the Corey's nor the Architect have contacted my husband since he expressed his concern. E WORK SCHEDULE Dropping off of equipment and materials. My husband was already blocked in the street by work trucks, returning home from work, and this was only for the poles were being installed. This is just the beginning. How is the work schedule being regulated and controlled? Please note all the justifiable concerns that the neighborhood expressed during the parking discussions with the town. If trucks are parked on both sides of the street, how are emergency vehicles going to pass. Please refer to notes at the recent town hall meeting approving the Alpine Ave. 90 Minute Parking Restrictions. Construction trucks should abide by all the rules approved and upheld in recent sessions. F 90 MINUTE PARKING Who is enforcing this? Who do we call? G Contact Person Who do we contact if we have a concern regarding, Construction, Parking or Noise Levels? How does it get resolved. Not the Corey's directly, a town planner in Los Gatos or working on the project H POOL LOCATION Once again, the Corey's stated at tour of the house that we would not see the new home. Please note, they designed a pool at the property line. When they sold us 38 Alpine there are three sitting areas to enjoy the view of the woods. One is a courtyard (photo), one has an outdoor fireplace and a deck on the second floor. All three will have a direct view of the home. I PENALTIES I doubt anything would be intentionally circumvented, but in the event any restrictions are not followed, how will that be rectified, what are the penalties? There needs to be established ground rules up front. J FENCE Since the proposed home is so close to the property line, additional bushes and trees should be planted on the construction side, to block workers looking into my Family Room K ADDITIONAL WORK ON STREET Additional project across the street from proposed site There will be an additional project across the street, how will the two be reconciled? 38 AVENVE--I LOSGATOS OFFERED AT $5,145,000 • A 00 r town Estate.:. Rarely does one find a property such as this. An elegantiydesigned and appointed home boasting unrivaled curb appeal and privacy situated in one of the prerniet downtown Los Gatos locations. Located on Alpine Avenue, one of the rare gems of downtown, this home offers immediate access to downtown Los Gatos amenittee whiie offering the stately elegance of an expansive, manicured Yl acre property. • _ Set back from the ataeet a n d elevated above e gorgeoto sea of green lawnand mature landscaping, one is if111111°•Ail..tely struck by Atte old world elegance and design of the horre. From the stamped concrete driveway to the cast concrete steps and walkways, rro exterior detail has been overlooked. Upon entering the home one is immediately struck bythe vaulted ceilings and amazing flow of the home, a combinateon of elegant design coupled With rnodern amenities and comforts. SUMMARY OFTHE HOME Elegant and timeless estate home situated on a very private 1/2 acre in downtown Los Gatos • Tom T. Travers designed home and interiors using the finest materials • Tremendous bonus room with kitchen offets k r4e guestsiaki-pair o( ereertainrnent space • Meticulously maintained and updated home withdesigner wat?paper, lighting and fixtures • Custom cabinetry, woodwork and trim throughout • Solid wood doors and windows with tremendous hatural light - Gleaming Brazilian Cherry wood lioors • Super efficient/green home with pre -paid solar system and -$25k of energy efficiency upgrades • Breathtaking circular entrance with elegant and dery grass -cloth wall coverings • G9peous master suite with attached balcony -Tfering privacy and views of surrounding hills Multiple outdoor areas to entertain and unwind, 'inckuokng an outtickol fWectkiiCe o Separate ground -floor bonus room or au pair/ guest suite with ability to add walk-in closet ature and meticulously maintained andscaping with tremendous privacy • Custom front doors featuring natural light • Gorgeously finished lam room with double washer and dryer High efficiency and low -maintenance meta/ . • tile roof • " Four -car garage with ability to convert to five or use as workshop, featuring solid Wood carnage doors A short stroll to Los Gatos High School, Library, and downtown M CHAEL RIESE 408.781.7692 650.209.0613 michael.riese©cbnorcal.com RieseRealEstate.com Ca I B R E #01366625 Ri ESEREALESTA Caldwell Banker Team z ;t airs: balcony, highlighted -in selle marke&g material This Page Intentionally Left Blank Corey PC2 6-26-17.pin GENERAL NOTES 1. CODES AND REGULATIONS 2. SITE VERIFICATION 3. MEASUREMENTS 4. DIMENSIONS 5. DISCREPANCIES 6. MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS 7. WINDOWS AND DOORS 8. CALGREEN STANDARDS ALL WORK AND MATERIALS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CODES, AS WELL AS ALL APPLICABLE STATE CODES & LOCAL CITY ORDINANCES, 2013 CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE (C.B.C.) 2013 CALIFORNIA RESIDENTIAL CODE (C.R.C.) 2013 CALIFORNIA ELECTRICAL CODE (C.E.C.) 2013 CALIFORNIA PLUMBING CODE (C.P.C.) 2013 CALIFORNIA MECHANICAL CODE (C.M.C.) 2013 CALIFORNIA FIRE CODE (C.F.C.) 2013 CALIFORNIA ENERGY CODE (C.E.C.) 2013 CALIFORNIA GREEN CODE (C.G.C.) NOTHING ON THE DRAWINGS IS TO BE CONSTRUED TO PERMIT WORK NOT CONFORMING TO THESE CODES & REGULATIONS. GENERAL CONTRACTOR AND SUBCONTRACTORS SHALL EXAMINE THOROUGHLY THE SITE AND SATISFY THEMSELVES AS TO THE CONDITIONS TO WHICH THE WORK IS TO BE PERFORMED. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY AT THE SITE ALL MEASUREMENTS AFFECTING HIS WORK, AND SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE CORRECTNESS OF THE SAME. NO EXTRA COST TO THE OWNER WILL BE ALLOWED RESULTING FROM HIS NEGLIGENCE TO EXAMINE OR FAILURE TO DISCOVER CONDITIONS AFFECTING HIS WORK. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS BY TAKING FIELD MEASUREMENTS; FOR PROPER FIT AND ATTACHMENT OF ALL PARTS IS REQUIRED. SHOULD THERE BE ANY DISCREPANCIES, IMMEDIATELY REPORT TO THE ARCHITECT IN WRITING PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF ANY RELATED WORK. IN THE EVENT OF THE CONTRACTOR'S FAILURE TO DO SO, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE FULLY AND SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR THE CORRECTION OR ADJUSTMENT OF ANY SUCH RELATED WORK OR ERRORS. DO NOT SCALE THESE DRAWINGS. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS SHALL TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER SCALED DRAWINGS. MINOR DISCREPANCIES BETWEEN THE DRAWINGS AND ACTUAL CONDITIONS ARE TO BE EXPECTED. CONDITIONS REQUIRING CLARIFICATION SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE ARCHITECT IMMEDIATELY. CONTRACTOR AND ALL SUBCONTRACTORS SHALL INSTALL OR APPLY, AND PROTECT ALL PRODUCTS, MATERIALS, PROCESSES, METHODS, COATINGS, EQUIPMENT, APPLIANCES, HARDWARE, SOFTWARE, ETC. IN STRICT ACCORDANCE WITH THE MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS, DETAILS & INSTRUCTIONS, TYPICAL. ALL MANUALS OR INSTRUCTIONS PROVIDED BY THESE MANUFACTURER'S FOR PROPER OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF THE ABOVE ARE TO BE DELIVERED TO THE OWNER AT THE COMPLETION AND FINAL INSPECTION OF THE PROJECT. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY THE QUANTITY, ROUGH OPENINGS AND TYPES OF DOORS AND WINDOW AND DOOR SCHEDULES IN RELATION TO FRAMING PER FIELD PRIOR TO ORDERING. ANY DISCREPANCIES SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE ARCHITECT IMMEDIATELY. ALL ADHESIVES, SEALANTS, CAULKS, PAINTS, COATINGS, AND AEROSOL PAINT CONTAINERS MUST REMAIN ON THE SITE FOR FIELD VERIFICATION BY THE BUILDING INSPECTOR. PER CGBSC SEC. 4.504.2.4 PRIOR TO FINAL INSPECTION, A LETTER SIGNED BY THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR OR THE OWNER/BUILDER (FOR ANY OWNER/BUILDER) PROJECTS MUST BE PROVIDED TO THE CITY OF SAN JOSE BUILDING OFFICIAL CERTIFYING THAT ALL ADHESIVES, SEALANTS, CAULKS, PAINTS, COATINGS, AEROSOL PAINTS, AEROSOL COATINGS, CARPET SYSTEMS (INCLUDING CARPETING, CUSHION AND ADHESIVE), RESILIENT FLOORING SYSTEMS, AND COMPOSITE WOOD PRODUCTS INSTALLED ON THIS PROJECT ARE WITHIN THE EMISSION LIMITS SPECIFIED IN CGBSC SECTION 4.504. CONSULTANT DIRECTORY AREA TABULATIONS i PROJECT INFORMATION ARCHITECT METRO DESIGN GROUP CONTACT :TOM SLOAN A.I.A. 1475 S. BASCOM AVE. # 208 CAMPBELL, CALIFORNIA 95008 (408) 871-1071 PHONE (408) 871-1072 FAX CIVIL ENGINEER SANDIS CIVIL ENGINEERS SURVEYORS, CONTACT :CHAD J. BROWNING 1700 WINCHESTER BLVD,SUITE CAMPBELL, CALIFORNIA 95008 (408) 636-0900 PHONE (408) 636-0999 FAX TOPO SURVEY & BOUNDARIES WESTFALL ENGINEERS, INC. 14583 BIG BASIN WAY #3 SARATOGA, CA 95070 (408) 867-0244 PHONE PLANNERS 200 GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING POLLAK ENGINEERING, INC. 555 SANTA CRUZ AVE. LOS GATOS, CA 95030 (408) 354-0420 PHONE CONSULTING ARBORIST ARTISAN LANDSCAPES ARBORIST SERVICES GARETH JONES, CERTIFIED ARBORIST 12150 HWY 9, BOULDER CREEK, CA 95006 (408) 674-7856 PHONE PROJECT DESCRIPTION NEW SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE WITH ATTACHED TWO CAR GARAGE The site is located within the R-1-20 zoning district with step topographic conditions with an average slope of 41%. The constraints of the site such as the existing Trees and a Riparian Setback limit the options for siting a small house. The project has been designed to meet the "intent" of the Hillside Development Standards and Guidelines by siting the house in such a way that there is no grading outside of the LRDA. The site includes several natural features such as a riparian water course, steep grades, multiple mature trees and 2 street frontages on Alpine Ave. as well as Jackson St. Resulting from a Constraints Analysis, there is only one place that is acceptable to locate a residence. The proposed home is located within the LRDA as defined by an existing Riparian setback and the southerly building setback. The 2 car Garage was located on Alpine Ave. utilizing a portion of the existing driveway aprons and in an area that minimizes grading, preserves existing traffic patterns and uses no retaining walls or fill. The design of the home utilizes a "flat roof" to reduce bulk and mass, preserve the neighbor's natural views and deploys a Green Roof concept for source control of storm water. Downslope, the building elevations are broken into 3 individual elements and deep overhangs that provide shadows and articulation on the two-story walls. These techniques provide an articulated facade that blends into the shaded environment and diminishes the mass and height of the building while providing privacy screening amongst the adjacent residences. The new building has been sited and designed to eliminate any perceptible grading outside of the building envelope. This technique will result in a residence that seeming ties into the earth. The project will retain and enhance the surrounding natural features of the site and proposes no other landscape features. The existing trees will provide ample screening of the new residence from the adjacent neighbor located along the northerly property line. 80% of the existing trees on site will be retained with a few trees in close proximity to the structure being removed to provide a safe, defensible area and remove fire hazards as required for Fire Safety. The design for this project steps with the natural topography where setback requirements allow the adjacency of multiple rooms or spaces. Rather than visibly stepping the exterior appearance with added floor area sited up hill, the design chose a lower profile that integrates with the site and provides a lower visible height and mass. The Garage doors are shrouded in shade and corresponding horizontal wood siding and concealed within a creative use of building forms. The driveway will be reconstructed with a new precast concrete paver system capable of absorbing 100% of the storm water. The "historic" gate columns located along the street at the driveway entrance will remain and be restored. 1. SITE AREA - PER HILLSIDE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES GROSS: 20,000 SF NET: 8,000 SF (AFTER 60% SLOPE REDUCTION) (I) (L) 0.0023 x 2 x 4,111.35 = 41.20 % AVERAGE SITE SLOPE 0.459 (A) AVERAGE SLOPE OF THE AREA PROPOSED FOR DEVELOPMENT IS 55.19% (I) (L) S _ 0.0023 x 2 x 1,001.80 = 55.19 % AVERAGE SITE SLOPE OF THE AREA 0.08349 PROPOSED FOR DEVELOPMENT (A) SLOPE AT LANDING AREAS: SLOPE AT PAVED AREAS: SLOPE AT LANDSCAPE AREAS: 2. FLOOR AREA LOWER FLOOR UPPER FLOOR TOTAL AREA 1% MIN, AWAY FROM THE STRUCTURE 2% MIN, AWAY FROM THE STRUCTURE 5% MIN, AWAY FROM THE STRUCTURE GROSS FLOOR AREA - CELLAR* = 1,195.66 - 848.58 = 2,289.96 - 643.93 = 3,485.62 -1,492.51 = * CELLAR IS NOT INCLUDED IN FLOOR AREA RATIO (F.A.R.) GARAGE 557.95 TOTAL FLOOR AREA 4,043.57 3. MAXIMUM FLOOR AREA - FAR PER RESIDENTIAL DESIGN GUIDELINES FLOOR AREA PER DEF. 347.08 1,646.03 1,993.11 -143.43 = 414.52 -1,635.94 = 2,407.63 FAR = (.35)_ (8 - 5) X .20 0.326 FAR 0.326 X 8,000 = 2,608 SQUARE FEET 25 GAR = (.10)-(8 - 5) x .07 = 0.0916 GAR 0.0916 X 8,000 = 732.80 SQUARE FEET 25 LIVING AREA (W/O GAR.) ALLOWABLE PROPOSED 2,608.00 1,993.11 32.60 24.91 GARAGE ALLOWABLE 732.80 9.16 PROPOSED 414.52 5.18 TOTAL AREA (LIVING AREA & GARAGE) ALLOWABLE 3,340.80 PROPOSED 2,407.63 4. BUILDING COVERAGE MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE COVERAGE: PROPOSED COVERAGE: BUILDING(S) PORCHES TOTAL 5. PARKING SPACE 2 COVERED AT GARAGE 41.76 % 30.09 8,000.00 SQ. FT. 40.00 3,114.91 SQ. FT. 15.57 2,851.86 263.05 3,114.91 PROPERTY OWNERS PHONE MAILING ADDRESS PROJECT ADDRESS SITE AREA A.P.N. ZONING TOBY AND SUSAN COREY (408) 219-8222 122 8th AVENUE SANTA CRUZ, CA 95062 26 ALPINE AVENUE LOS GATOS, CA 95030 20,000 SQ. FT. (0.459 AC) 529-37-042 R1-20 LOCATED WITHIN DESIGNATED YES - STATE MANDATED LRA (VHFHA) WILDLAND URBAN INTERFACE FIRE AREA SETBACK REQUIREMENTS MAX HEIGHT ALLOWABLE / PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION TYPE OCCUPANCY STORIES FIRE SPRINKLERS EXISTING USE REQUIRED FRONT: SIDE: REAR: PROPOSED FRONT: LEFT SIDE: RIGHT SIDE: REAR: ALLOWED 30'-0" 25'-0" 15'-0" 25'-0" 30'-0" 15'-0" 31'-6" 66'-3" PROPOSED 28'-3" V-B R-3/U 2 2 REQUIRED (NFPA-13D) LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL - VACANT, URBAN VICINITY MAP SHEET INDEX A- 0 SHEET INDEX, PROJECT DESCRIPTION, VICINITY MAP, C GENERAL NOTES AND TABULATIONS A- 0.1 BUILD IT GREEN CHECKLIST C-1.0 TOWN NOTES, PROJECT DATA AND LEGEND C-1.1 CONSTRUCTION NOTES C-2.0 TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY C-3.0 GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN C-4.0 UTILITY PLAN C-5.0 EROSION CONTROL PLAN C-5.1 EROSION CONTROL DETAILS C-5.2 BLUEPRINT FOR A CLEAN BAY C-6.0 CONSTRUCTION DETAILS C-6.1 CONSTRUCTION DETAILS A- 1.0 SITE PLAN A- 4.0 A- 1.1 SITE DIAGRAMS, SITE CROSS SECTION A- 4.1 A- 1.2 STREET PROFILES A- 4.2 A- 1.3 SHADOW STUDY DIAGRAM A- 5.0 A- 1.4 EXTERIOR LIGHTING PLAN A- 5.1 A- 2.0 LOWER FLOOR PLAN TS- 0.1 A- 2.1 UPPER FLOOR PLAN TP- 0.1 A- 3.0 ROOF PLAN L- 1.0 ONSULTANTS, EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS CROSS SECTIONS 'A' & 'B' CROSS SECTION 'C' TREE SURVEY TREE PROTECTION PLAN TREE PLAN METROil DESIGN GROUP ARCHITECTURE• PLANNING• 1475 S BASCOM AVE SUITE CAMPBELL, CA 95008 (408)871-1071 phone (408)871-1072 fax www.metroarchitects.com ilk INTERIORS 208 The plans, ideas and design on this drawing are the property of the designer,divised solely for this contract. Plans shall not be used, in whole or in part, for any purpose for which they were not intended without the written permission of METRO DESIGN GROUP. Oc RESIDENCE 26 LOS APN# PROJECT COREY ALPINE GATOS, 529-37-042 AVE NAME CA 95030 REVISIONS n PC1 10-27-16 D.Z. A PC2 1-17-17 D.Z. %\3 PC2 6-06-17 T.S. A PC2 6-26-17 D.Z. COVER GENERAL NOTES PROJECT INFORMATION AREA TABULATIONS PROJECT DESCRIPTION VICINITY MAP SHEET INDEX CONSULTANT SHEET DIRECTORY DATE : 1 -17 -17 SCALE : AS -NOTED DRAWN BY : TS CHECKED BY : TS ARCHITECT : TOM SLOAN PROJECT NO : 16621 SHEET NUMBER A-O EXHIBIT 15 Corey PC2 6-26-17.pin GreenPointRATED A PROGRAM OF BUILD IT GREEN NEW HOME RATING SYSTEM, VERSION 6.0 SINGLE FAMILY CHECKLIST The GreenPoint Rated checklist tracks green features incorporated 111.13 the name, GreenPoint Rated., administered by Bailie I. Green, a non-proftt whose mission is to p mete healthy, energy end resource efficient buildings in Canrern.a. (2). Energy (25). Indoor A.r Quality/Health (6), R.e.a„r.es (6), .n. Water (6):.no m eer tn. pr.raguIsees CALGreen M.neatery, H6.1, J5,1, 01. 07 The criteria for the graben building pr.etces eaten below are described n the GreenPoint Rated Single Fa mny Rating Manual. Fa, more rnrormanan www.builditgreen.orgfgreenpointrated Build fit Green is not a code enforcement agency. A home is only GreenPcint Rated if all features are verified by a Certified GreenPoint Rater through Build It Green. S.n9le Famd5 Now Homo Version 6.0.2 COREY RESIDENC CALGreen TBD TBD TBD TBD Y., TBD Y.s Y., TBD TBD TBD B. FOUNDATION TBD TBD Y., TBD TBD Y.. C.LANDSCAPE TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD Y.. TBD TBD MEASURES CALGreen Res (REQUIRED) Al. Construction Footprint A2. Job Site Construction Waste Diversion A2.1 65% C&D Arc.rn.tl.. Daly Cover) A2.2 65% CAE W.... (ExcludingAternau„e Dad, C....) A2.3 Re g Rates o-om Tm,d-P. , V.,�.�.e. M�.ed-Us. W.... A3. Recycled Content Base Material m A4. Heat Island Effect Reduction (Non -Roof) A5. Construction Environmental Quality Management Plan Including Flush -Out A6. Stormwater Control: Prescriptive Path AG.1 1V1.tarl.1 A6.2 Fdtr.t.on .nil., Bm-R...nhbn F.etura. A6.3 Nan-L...n.no Re.r.ng M...,.s A6.4 S m a,. St.,. w..e r Str... A7. Stormwater Control: Performance Path B1. Fly Ash and/or Slag in Concrete B2. Radon -Resistant Construction B3. Foundation Drainage System B4. Moisture Controlled Crawlspace B5. Structural Pest Controls B5.1 Ter iIt. Snt.tds .n. S. r.too Est.rlor Wood -to -Concrete Connections B5.2PlantTr..nn. Bases, oar St. in. tit Leas.36I......ramtn.Foundat,on Cl. Plants Grouped by Water Needs (Hydrozoning) C2. Three Inches of Mulch in Planting Beds C3. Resource Efficient Landscapes C3. No Ll.t.. by C.1-IPC C3.2 R. n., C...... nd Lao...... Grow to N...,., St.. C3.3 Dr.... Caar.rnia Nat...,., M..iL.r.aaaanSp �.,. orOLm.r Apprap ate Species C4. Minimal Turf in Landscape C4.1 N. Tone n S.o s E. g 10% and N. O,.orn..a Spnn...r. In.t Arta, L... Than E., L F... W... C4.2T.,,anaA. C5. Trees to Moderate Building Temperature C6. High -Efficiency Irrigation System C7. One Inch of Compost in the Top Six to Twelve Inches of Soil CB. Rainwater Harvesting System C9. Recycled Wastewater irrigation System C10. Submeter or Dedicated Meter for Landscape Irrigation C11. Landscape Meets Water Budget C12. Environmentally Preferable Materials for Site Eiomon ..no FonIng C13. Reduced Light Pollution C14. Large Stature Tree(s) C15. Third Party Landscape Program Certification C16. Maintenance Contract with Certified Professional D. STRUCTURAL FRAME AND BUILDING ENVELOPE TBD © Build It Green D1. Optimal Value Engineering D1.1 Joists, Rare,„ and St„d, at 24 Inch.. an Canter D1.2 Nan D.a, , ne Wtnaaw He.ee„ S,..d sir L... D2. Construction Material Efficiencies D3. Engineered Umber D3.2 Waa. -Joist, a, W.b 7r„sses ran Fiao,s D3.3 En ere. L..m oar far Raar Rarer. D3.4 En note. or ro, Ver.1car App at.en, D3.5 OSBnr., Sa r,aar D3.60SB.orW. an.RoorSr, d.tn g D4. Insulated Headers Points Achieved: 58 Certification Level: Certified POINTS REQUIRED 25 21.0 80 100 80 GreenPoint Rated New Home Single Family Checklist Version 6.0 Possible Poin Slagle Family New Home Version 6.0.2 D5. FSC-Certified Wood TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD E. EXTERIOR TBD TBD TBD TBD Y >_25% F. INSULATION TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD D5.2 P. n e. P,a. a cts 136. Solid Wall Systems D6.1 A. L..st 00% or Fiaars D6.2 A, L...., 00% or E,t.rlor W.I., D6.3 A. L.,,.00% or Roar, D7. Energy Heels on Roof Trusses DB. Overhangs and Gutters D9. Reduced Pollution Entering the Home from the Garage D6. Dot.cn.dGar.ge D6.2 M.Li .n ro, Attar .. G.r.g. D10. Structural Pest and Rot Controls D10.1 A. W.na. Larva... At L....12 Inches Abn„e the S.,. D10.2 Wood Framing Treated WIta Borates or Factory -Impregnated, or Wa Materials Ours Tn.n W000 D11. Moisture -Resistant Materials in Wet Areas (such as Kitchen, Bathrooms, Utility Rooms, and Basements) El. Environmentally Preferable Decking E2. Flashing Installation Third -Party Verified E3. Ram Screen Wall System E4. Durable and Non -Combustible Cladding Materials E5. Durable Roofing Materials ES."I D„,ab1. and Fbe R.,I,tantRao. gMat.rais a,A„em , E6. Vegetated Roof F1. Insulation with 36 % Post -Consumer or 60%Post-Industrial Recycled Content F1.1 F1.2 C.3nng, F2. Insulation that Meets the CDPH Standard Method -Residential for Low Emissions F2.1 F2.2 Cehinga F3. Insulation That Does Not Contain Fire Retardants F3.1 C...dy W.....nd Fioo,s F3.2 C..ngs F3.31ntarar and Ea.,ar GI. Efficient Distribution of Domestic Hot Water G1.1 I...1.c.. Hat Water Pipes G1.2 WateSen,e Voi..me Lmdra, Hat W.t... D.,o-tb.uan. G1.3Increased Eric. n H.. W.... D,.trtbut.on G2 Install Water -Efficient F.xtwes G2.1 W.terS.n... Snawern..e. won M...mng Compens..an Va.. G2-3 Wa eSen,e Toe , with a Ma.tmum Pe,rarmance (M.P) Threamai. Na L... Than 500 Gram , G3. Pre -Plumbing for Graywater System G4. Operational Graywater System H. HEATING, VENTILATION, AND AIR CONDITIONING Y TBD TBD Y. TBD TBD Y. TBD TBD TBD TBD Ye TBD TBD TBD H1. Sealed Combustion Units H1.1 S..iee Com...nen Furn.o. H1.2 S..1.. Cambn.t,nn W.t., Heat., H2. High Performing Zoned Hydronic Radiant Heating System H3. Effective Ductwork H3.1 D.cL Masne an Dnc. Joins n.Seam, H3.2 P,...... D...w.r. Syst.m H4. ENERGY STAR® Bathroom Fans Per HVI Standards with Air Flow Verified H5. Advanced Practices for Cooling H5.1 ENERGY STAR C..img F.nsA,....ne Beer.. in. H6. Whole House Mechanical Ventilation Practices to Improve Indoor Mr Quality H6.1 M... ASH RAE 62.2-2010 V. nt... L.. n R....1 Ble nc bin g H6.2 Adv..,... V.nb....on Sta nd.rds H6.3 Out. oar A.. Duc....o B..ro o m and L.>.tng A.... H7. Effective Range Hood Design and Installation H7.1 Enos..... R.n . Hone D„c g n. De g H72Au.oms„.Ra .H...Conro H6. No Fireplace or Sealed Gas Fireplace H9. Humidity Control Systems HID. Register Design Per ACCA Manual T H11. High Efficiency HVAC Filter (MERV 8+) I. RENEWABLE ENERGY TBD TBD TBD TBD © Build It Green 11. Pre -Plumbing for Solar Water Heating 12. Preparation for Future Photovoltaic Installation 13. Onsite Renewable Generation (Solar PV, Solar Thermal. and Wind) 14. Net Zero Energy Home 14 1 N.., Z.,. E...., Haim 14.2 N.. Z... Eeanc 6 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 2 I 2 I I I I 1 i i 1 1 1 2 2 1 1 2 2 1 1 1I 1 Y R R R 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 25 2 4 GreenPcint Rated New Home Single Family Checklist Version 6.0 Fa .y New Hone Version 6.0.2 J. BUILDING PERFORMANCE AND TESTING TBD TBD TBD TBD 2013 6.00% Y TBD TBD N. TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD J1. Third -Party Verification of Quality of Insulation Installation J2. Supply and Return Air Flow Testing J3. Mechanical Ventilation Testing and Low Leakage J4. Combustion Appliance Safety Testing J5. Building Performance Exceeds Title 24 Part 6 J5.1 H.me Ontpnano,m, T... 24 P.rt6 J6. Tille 24 Prepared and Signed by a CABEC Certified Energy Analyst J7. Participation in Utility Program with Third -Party Plan Review J8. ENERGY STAR for Homes J9. EPA Indoor airPlus Certification J10. Blower Door Testing K1. Entryways Designed to Reduce Tracked -In Contaminants K1.1 1..,,..l Ent,yw.„ K2. Zero-VOC Interior Wall and Ceiling Paints K3. Low-VOC Caulks and Adhesives K4. Environmentally Preferable Materials for Interior Finish K4 1 Caon.ts K4.2 Intanar Tr,rn K4.3 Shei.ng K4.4 D.ar. K4.5 Count.rtaps K5. Formaldehyde Emissions in Interior Finish Exceed CARE K5.1 D..., K5.2 Ca [Pinata en. Countvrtops TBD TBD TBD L. FLOORING TBD TBD TBD K6. Products That Comply With the Health Product Declaration Open Standard K7. Indoor Air Formaldehyde Level Less Than 27 Parts Per Billion KB.. Comprehensive Inclusion of Low Emitting Finishes 17 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 L1. Environmentally Preferable Flooring L2. Low -Emitting Flooring Meets CDPH 2010 Standard Method -Residential L3. Durable Flooring L4. Thermal Mass Flooring 1 M. APPLIANCES AND LIGHTING Y CEE T.., 2 <25... TBD TBD TBD N. COMMUNITY N. TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD Y.. TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD O. OTHER TBD Y TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD MI. ENERGY STAR® Dishwasher M2. CEE-Rated Clothes Washer M3. Size -Efficient ENERGY STAR Refrigerator M4. Permanent Centers for Waste Reduction Strategies M4.1 Boin-In M4.2 Bunn -In Co Cont., M5, Lighting Efficiency 1Y15.1 High-E.... ... Lgnting M5.2 Lignung Sys..m D.s.gn.d.o IESNA Foo.c.n.ie St.,...,ds or D..,gn.d by L.g g C.n,an.nt N1- Smart Development N1.1 Inrn.r S... N1.3 Con..,.e Den y N1,5 Hon,. 5,.. Eficency N2. Home(s)lDevelopment Located Within 1/2 Mile of a Major Transit Stop 143. Pedestrian and Bicycle Access N3..2 Cannes an E. P. e,.,1an Pat.. y N3.3 L.,. C. m g 5ma g , N4. Outdoor Gathering Places N4,1 P..... or Semi -Pub!, 0u...o, Gatne g Races ..r R.s1...n.. N4.2 P. t.n. Oota.or G.th.ring T., 1 Camm� y N5. Social Interaction N5.1 R.......e En .es w n Vi.w,.. NS. 2 Ent,..... 5,<e.t orator' 0...er Front D.... N5,3 S.... N5,4 5o.,., G..n.... tip... N6. Passive Solar Design N61 Hoak., L... NG.2 L... N7. Adaptable Building N7,1 Li...-. 0. n Prinoini..in U... N7. 2 F..-Funot..n Ino R.rn.1 Unit 01. GreenPoint Rated Checklist in Blueprints 02. Pre -Construction Kickoff Meeting whh Rater and Subcontractors 03. Orientation and Training to Occupants -Conduct Educational Walkthroughs 04. Builders or Developer's Management Staff are Certified Green Building Professionals 05. Home System Monitors 06. Green Building Education 06.1 Marketing G,..n Bunning 062 G,..n g Sig n. g. 07. Green Appraisal Addendum OB. Detailed Durability Plan and Third -Party Verification of Plan Implementation 3 3 1 1 2 9 1 1 R 1 0. 05 0.5 0.5 0.5 05 0. 0 0.5 1 0.5 R 1 342 25 131 12 Minimum Points Required in Specific Categories ;0 25 6 58.0 5.0 9 Build It Green GreenPoint Rated New Home Single Family Checklist Version 5.0 METRO DESIGN GROUP ARCHITECTURE• PLANNING• INTERIORS 1475 S BASCOM AVE SUITE 208 CAMPBELL, CA 95008 (408)871-1071 phone (408)871-1072 fax www.metroarchitects.com The plans, ideas and design on this drawing are the property of the designer,divised solely for this contract. Plans shall not be used, in whole or in part, for any purpose for which they were not intended without the written permission of METRO DESIGN GROUP. Oc RESIDENCE 26 LOS APN# PROJECT COREY ALPINE GATOS, 529-37-042 AVE NAME CA 95030 REVISIONS BUILD IT GREEN CHECKLIST DATE : 1 -17 -17 SCALE : N.T.S. DRAWN BY : DZ CHECKED BY : TS ARCHITECT : TOM SLOAN PROJECT NO : 16621 SHEET NUMBER A-O.1 cc w 0 cc Y W 0� aw O O Z w 0 = I- 1- u- w Jam, w 00 ow zz 0 w o J w o� 0 zc� O z J CC aQ Q aQ (n J zCC wLLJ w CCz cf w V • w <0 CC 0z 00 d' Y o0 aLL 0 zw O cc wa Jcc a0 o O w w= wLn oz zw I z V z w V ccz w �w LL oQ 00 U J �w 0 Li V m oQ w CC Q 0 0 w ~a CC o"- w O J 0< zQ O= • w w w ow CC O F- c a o mw o, • zCD 0 d O • w Ew LLJ 0 V a Q z w N 0 L., LLJ z N c c awe J Q Q J a) Na w = Q F- o F-a w�1 eCo� L98 • w 0 I cc= z o U OQzk 0 ENG\26 Alpine Avenue co UT' TOWN OF LOS GATOS STANDARD PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT NOTES 1. ALL WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING: a. TOWN OF LOS GATOS ENGINEERING DESIGN STANDARDS AND SPECIF1CA T1ONS (UNLESS SPECIFICALLY STATED OTHERWISE ON THE PLANS). b. ALL TOWN OF LOS GATOS CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RELATED TO THE PROJECT c. THESE PLANS AND DETAILS. d. RECOMMENDA 110NS OF THE PROJECT SOILS INVESTIGA 770N SOILS ENGINEER: POLIAK ENGINEERS INC REFERENCE REPORT NO. 1138. DATED AUGUST 5. 2016 LETTER NO. REPORT PENDING, DATED: REPORT PENDING. SHALL BE THOROUGHLY COMPLIED WITH. BOTH THE MENTIONED REPORT AND ALL UPDA IFS/ADDENDUMS/LETTERS ARE HEREBY APPENDED AND MADE A PART OF THESE PLANS. 2. NO WORK MAY BE STARTED ON -SITE WITHOUT AN APPROVED GRADING PLAN AND A GRADING PERMIT ISSUED BY THE TOWN OF LOS GATOS, PARKS AND PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT LOCATED AT 41 MILES AVENUE, LOS GATOS, CA 95030. 3. A PRE -JOB MEETING SHALL BE HELD WITH THE TOWN ENGINEERING INSPECTOR FROM THE PARKS AND PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT PRIOR TO ANY WORK BEING DONE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CALL THE INSPEC77ONS LINE AT (4080 399-5771 AT LEAST FORTY-EIGHT (48) HOURS PRIOR TO ANY GRADING OR ONSITE WORK. THIS MEETING SHOULD INCLUDE: a. A DISCUSSION OF 111E PROJECT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL, WORKING HOURS, SITE MAINTENANCE AND OTHER CONSTRUCTION MATTERS; b. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT IN WRITING THAT CONTRACTOR AND APPLICANT HAVE READ AND UNDERSTAND THE PROJECT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL, AND WILL MAKE CERTAIN THAT ALL PROJECT SUB -CONTRACTORS HAVE READ AND UNDERSTAND THEM PRIOR TO COMMENCING WORK AND THAT A COPY OF THE PROJECT COND177ONS OF APPROVAL WILL BE POSTED ON SITE AT ALL IIMES DURING CONSTRUCT10N. 4. APPROVAL OF PLANS DOES NOT RELEASE THE DEVELOPER OF THE RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE CORRECTION OF MISTAKES, ERRORS, OR OMISSIONS CONTAINED (HEREIN. IF, DURING THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION OF THE IMPROVEMENTS, PUBLIC INTEREST AND SAFETY REQUIRES A MODIF1CA 170N OR DEPARTURE FROM THE TOWN SPECIF1CA T1ONS OR THESE IMPROVEMENT PLANS, THE TOWN ENGINEER SHALL HAVE FULL AUTHORITY TO REQUIRE SUCH MODIFICATION OR DEPARTURE AND TO SPECIFY THE MANNER IN WHICH THE SAME IS TO BE MADE. 5. APPROVAL OF THIS PLAN APPLIES ONLY TO THE GRADING, EXCA VA T10N, PLACEMENT AND COMPACTION OF NATURAL EARTH MATERIALS. THIS APPROVAL DOES NOT CONFER ANY RIGHTS OF ENTRY TO EITHER PUBLIC PROPERTY OR THE PRIVATE PROPERTY OF OTHERS AND DOES NOT CONSTITUTE APPROVAL OF ANY OTHER IMPROVEMENTS. 6. IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE PERMITTEE OR CONTRACTOR TO IDENTIFY, LOCATE AND PROTECT ALL UNDERGROUND FACILITIES PERMITTEE OR CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY USA (UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT) AT 1-800-227-2600 A MINIMUM OF FORTY-EIGHT (48) HOURS BUT NOT MORE THAN FOURTEEN (14) DAYS PRIOR TO COMMENCING ALL WORK. Z ALL WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED IN SUCH A MANNER AS TO COMPLY WITH THE STANDARDS ESTABLISHED BY THE AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT FOR AIRBORNE PARTICULATES. 8. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLY WI7H ALL LOCAL, STATE AND FEDERAL LAWS, CODES, RULES AND REGULATIONS GOVERNING THE WORK IDENTIFIED ON THESE PLANS. THESE SHALL INCLUDE, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SAFETY AND HEALTH RULES AND REGULA T1ONS ESTABLISHED BY OR PURSUANT TO THE OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ACT OR ANY OTHER APPLICABLE PUBLIC AUTHORITY. 9. THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE QUALIFIED SUPERVISION ON THE JOB SITE AT ALL TIMES DURING CONSTRUCTION. 10. CONTRACTOR SHALL EXERCISE ALL NECESSARY CAUTION TO AVOID DAMAGE TO ANY EXISTING TREES, SURFACE IMPROVEMENTS, DRAINAGE, WA TER, SEWER, ELECTRICAL OR TELECOMMUNICA 170N FACILITIES WHETHER ABOVE GROUND OR UNDERGROUND. CONTRACTOR SHALL BEAR FULL RESPONSIBILITY FOR ANY DAMAGE (HERETO. 11. HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL CONTROLS SHALL BE SET AND CERTIFIED BY A LICENSED SURVEYOR OR REGISTERED CIVIL ENGINEER QUALIFIED TO PRACTICE LAND SURVEYING. 12. DURING CONSTRUCTION, ALL APPLICABLE WORK (SUBGRADE, PAVING, ETC.) SHALL BE INSPECTED BY THE APPLICANT'S SOILS ENGINEER. THE ENGINEER SHALL BE NO METED AT LEAST 48 HOURS BEFORE BEGINNING SUCH WORK. THE ENGINEER SHALL BE ON -SITE TO VERIFY COND/T1ONS AS REQUIRED IN HIS REPORT SHOULD ANY CHANGES TO THE REPORT RECOMMENDA 11ONS BE NECESSARY, TOWN APPROVAL SHALL BE OBTAINED PRIOR TO ANY ASSOCIATED WORK. 13. THE RESULTS OF THE CONSTRUCTION OBSERVA 110N AND TESTING SHALL BE DOCUMENTED IN AN 'AS -BUILT" LETTER/REPORT PREPARED BY THE APPLICANTS' SOILS ENGINEER AND SUBMITTED FOR 7HE TOWN'S REVIEW AND ACCEPTANCE BEFORE FINAL RELEASE OF ANY OCCUPANCY PERMIT IS GRANTED. 14. ALL PRIVATE AND PUBLIC STREETS ACCESSING PROJECT SITE SHALL BE KEPT OPEN AND IN A SAFE, DRIVABLE CONDITION THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION. IF TEMPORARY CLOSURE IS NEEDED, THEN FORMAL WRITTEN NOTICE TO 7HE ADJACENT NEIGHBORS AND THE TOWN OF LOS GATOS PARKS AND PUBUC WORKS DEPARTMENT SHALL BE PROVIDED AT LEAST ONE WEEK IN ADVANCE OF CLOSURE, AND NO CLOSURE SHALL BE GRANTED WITHOUT THE EXPRESS WRITTEN APPROVAL OF THE TOWN. NO MATERIAL OR EQUIPMENT SHALL BE STORED IN THE PUBLIC OR PRIVATE RIGHT-OF-WAY. 15. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL AND MAINTAIN FENCES, BARRIERS, LIGHTS AND SIGNS THAT ARE NECESSARY TO GIVE ADEQUATE WARNING AND PROTECTION TO THE PUBLIC AT ALL 77MES 16. OWNER/APPLICANT TOM SLOAN AIA PHONE: (408) 871-1071 1Z GENERAL CONTRACTOR:: T.B.D. PHONE. 7 B.D. 18. A TOWN ENCROACHMENT PERMIT IS REQUIRED FOR ANY WORK WITHIN THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY. A STATE ENCROACHMENT PERMIT IS REQUIRED FOR ANY WORK WITHIN STATE RIGHT-OF-WAY (IF APPLICABLE). THE PERMITTEE AND/OR CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATING INSPECTION PERFORMED BY OTHER GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES. 19. GOOD HOUSEKEEPING PRACTICES SHALL BE OBSERVED AT ALL 7TMES DURING THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCT10N. SUPERINTENDENCE OF CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE DILIGENTLY PERFORMED BY A PERSON OR PERSONS AUTHORIZED TO DO SO AT ALL IIMES DURING WORKING HOURS. THE STORING OF GOODS AND/OR MATERIALS ON THE SIDEWALK AND/OR THE STREET WILL NOT BE ALLOWED UNLESS A SPECIAL PERMIT IS ISSUED BY THE ENGINEERING DIVISION. THE ADJACENT PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY SHALL BE KEPT CLEAR OF ALL JOB RELATED DIRT AND DEBRIS AT THE END OF THE DAY. FAILURE TO MAINTAIN THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY ACCORDING TO THIS COND1710N MAY RESULT IN PENAL 77ES AND/OR THE TOWN PERFORMING THE REQUIRED MAINTENANCE AT THE DEVELOPER'S EXPENSE. TOWN OF LOS GATOS NPDES NOTS 1. SEDIMENT FROM AREAS DISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE RETAINED ON SITE USING STRUCTURAL CONTROLS AS REQUIRED BY THE STATEWIDE GENERAL CONSTRUCTION STORMWA TER PERMIT 2. STOCKPILES OF SOIL SHALL BE PROPERLY CONTAINED TO MINIMIZE SEDIMENT TRANSPORT FROM THE SITE TO STREETS, DRAINAGE FACIU7TES OR ADJACENT PROPERTIES VIA RUNOFF VEHICLE TRACKING, OR WIND AS REQUIRED BY THE STATEWIDE GENERAL CONSTRUCTION STORMWA TER PERMIT 3. APPROPRIATE BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES (BMPS) FOR CONSTRUCTION-RELA LED MATERIALS, WASTES, SPILL OR RESIDES SHALL BE IMPLEMENTED TO MINIMIZE TRANSPORT FROM THE SITE TO STREETS, DRAINAGE FACILITIES, OR ADJOINING PROPERTY BY WIND OR RUNOFF AS REQUIRED BY THE STATEWIDE GENERAL CONSTRUCTION STORMWA TER PERMIT 4. RUNOFF FROM EQUIPMENT AND VEHICLE WASHING SHALL BE CONTA/NED AT CONSTRUCTION SITES AND MUST NOT BE DISCHARGED TO RECEIVING WATERS OR TO THE LOCAL STORM DRAIN SYSTEM. 5. ALL CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTOR AND SUBCONTRACTOR PERSONNEL ARE TO BE MADE AWARE OF THE REQUIRED BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES (BMPS) AND GOOD HOUSEKEEPING MEASURES FOR 1HE PROJECT SITE AND ANY ASSOCIATED CONSTRUCTION STAGING AREAS. 6. AT THE END OF EACH DAY OF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY, AU CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS AND WASTE MATERIALS SHALL BE COLLECTED AND PROPERLY DISPOSED IN TRASH OR RECYCLE BINS. Z CONSTRUCTION SITES SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN SUCH A CONDITION THAT A STORM DOES NOT CARRY WASTE OR POLLUTANTS OFF OF THE SITE. DISCHARGES OF MATERIAL OTHER THAN STORMWA TER (NON-STORMWA7E'R DISCHARGES) ARE PROHIBITED EXCEPT AS AUTHOR/ZED BY AN INDIVIDUAL NAT7ONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE EUM/NA T10N SYSTEM (NPDES) PERMIT OR THE STATEWIDE GENERAL CONSTRUCTION STORMWATER PERMIT POTENTIAL POLLUTANTS INCLUDE BUT ARE NOT LIMITED TO: SOLID OR LIQUID CHEMICAL SPILLS; WASTES FROM PAINTS, STAINS, SEALANTS, SOLVENTS, DETERGENTS, GLUES, LIME, PESTICIDES, HERBICIDES, FERTILIZERS, WOOD PRESERVATIVES AND ASBESTOS FIBERS, PAINT FLAKES OR STUCCO FRAGMENTS; FUELS, OILS, LUBRICANTS, AND HYDRAULIC, RADIATOR OR BATTERY FLUIDS; CONCRETE AND RELATED CUTTING OR CURING RESIDUES; FLOATABLE WASTES; WASTES FROM ENGINE/EQUIPMENT STEAM CLEANING OR CHEMICAL DEGREASING; WASTES FROM STREET CLEANING; AND SUPERCHLORINA TED POTABLE WA TER FROM LINE FLUSHING AND TESTING. DURING CONSTRUCTION, DISPOSAL OF SUCH MATERIALS SHOULD OCCUR IN A SPECIFIED AND CONTROLLED TEMPORARY AREA ON -SITE PHYSICALLY SEPARATED FROM PO ENI7AL STORMWA TER RUNOFF, KITH ULTIMATE DISPOSAL IN ACCORDANCE WITH LOCAL, STATE AND FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS. 8. DISCHARGING CONTAMINATED GROUNDWATER PRODUCED BY DEWA TERING GROUNDWATER THAT HAS INF1L IRA LED INTO THE CONSTRUCTION SITE IS PROHIBITED. DISCHARGING OF CONTAMINATED SOILS VIA SURFACE EROSION IS ALSO PROHIBITED. DISCHARGING NON -CONTAMINATED GROUNDWATER PRODUCED BY DEWA TERING AC11 VITIES REQUIRES A NA T10NAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIM/NA 110N SYSTEM (NPDES) PERMIT FROM 17-1E RESPECT1VE STATE' REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD. PLAN FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF 26 ALPINE AVENUE TOWN OF LOS GATOS PLANNING APPLICATION NO. S-16-052 DUST CONTROL NOTES 1. WA TER TRUCKS SHALL BE PRESENT AND IN USE AT THE CONSTRUCTION SITE. ALL PORTIONS OF THE SITE SUBJECT TO BLOWING DUST SHALL BE WATERED AS OFTEN AS DEEMED NECESSARY BY THE CUENT/?NSPECTOR IN ORDER TO INSURE PROPER CONTROL OF BLOWING DUST FOR THE DURATION OF THE PROJECT 2. ALL PUBLIC STREETS AND MEDIANS SOILED OR UTTERED DUE TO INS CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY SHALL BE CLEANED AND SWEPT ON A DAILY BASIS DURING THE WORK WEEK, OR AS OFTEN AS DEEMED NECESSARY BY THE CLIENT/INSPECTOR, OR TO 7HE SAT1SFAC770N OF THE TOWN'S DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS. 3. ALL ]RUCKS HAULING SOIL, SAND, AND 07HER LOOSE MA 1ERIALS SHALL BE COVERED W17N TARPAULINS OR OTHER EFFECTIVE COVERS. 4. WHEEL WASHERS SHALL BE INSTALLED AND USED TO CLEAN ALL TRUCKS AND EQUIPMENT LEAVING THE CONSTRUCTION SITE. IF WHEEL WASHERS CANNOT BE INSTALLED, TIRES OR TRACKS OF ALL TRUCKS AND EQUIPMENT SHALL BE WASHED OFF BEFORE LEAVING THE CONSTRUCTION SITE. 5. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DEMONSTRATE DUST SUPPRESSION MEASURES, SUCH AS REGULAR WATERING, WHICH SHALL BE IMPLEMENTED TO REDUCE EMISSIONS DURING CONSTRUCTION AND GRADING IN A MANNER MEETING THE APPROVAL OF 17-HE CONSTRUCTION MANAGER. THIS SHALL ASSIST IN REDUCING SHORT-TERM IMPACTS FROM PART1CLES WHICH COULD RESULT IN NUISANCES THAT ARE PROHIBITED BY RULE 403 (FUGITIVE DUST). 6. GRADING OR ANY OTHER OPERA 11ONS THAT CREA IFS DUST SHALL BE STOPPED IMMEDIATELY IF DUST AFFECTS ADJACENT PROPERTIES THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE SUFFICIENT DUST CONTROL FOR THE ENTIRE PROJECT SITE IN ACCORDANCE 1117H THE PROJECT SWPPP (IF ONE EXISTS) OR AS APPLICABLE PER LOCAL REGULATIONS AT ALL TIMES THE SITE SHALL BE SPRINKLERED AS NECESSARY TO PREVENT DUST NUISANCE. IN 1HE EVENT THAT THE CONTRACTOR NEGLECTS TO USE ADEQUATE MEASURES TO CONTROL DUST THE CLIENT RESERVES 1HE RIGHT TO TAKE WHATEVER MEASURES ARE NECESSARY TO CONTROL DUST AND CHARGE THE COST TO 1HE CONTRACTOR. Z THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR DUST CONTROL MEASURES AND FOR OBTAINING AU REQUIRED PERMITS AND APPROVALS. ALL GRADING OPERATIONS SHALL BE SUSPENDED DURING SECOND (OR WORSE) STAGE SMOG ALERTS. GENERAL SITE NOTES 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL VISIT THE SITE PRIOR TO BIDDING ON THIS WORK AND CONSIDER THE EXISTING CONDITIONS AND SITE CONSTRAINTS IN THE BID. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE IN THE POSSESSION OF AND FAMILIAR WITH ALL APPLICABLE GOVERNING AGENCIES STANDARD DETAILS AND SPECIFICATIONS PRIOR TO SUBMITTING OF A BID. 2. ALL WORK ON -SITE AND IN THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY SHALL CONFORM TO ALL APPLICABLE GOVERNING AGENCIES STANDARD DETAILS & SPECIFICATIONS. 3. PRIOR TO BEGINNING WORK, AND AFTER INITIAL HORIZONTAL CONTROL STAKING, CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD CHECK ALL ELEVATIONS MARKED WITH (E) AND REPORT ANY DISCREPANCIES GREATER THAN 0.05' TO THE ENGINEER. 4. DAMAGE TO ANY EXISTING SITE IMPROVEMENTS, UTILITIES AND/OR SERVICES TO REMAIN SHALL BE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR. CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR AND/OR REPLACE IN KIND. 5. CONTRACTOR AGREES THAT HE SHALL ASSUME SOLE AND COMPLETE RESPONSIBILITY FOR JOB SITE CONDITIONS DURING THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT INCLUDING SAFETY OF ALL PERSONS AND PROPERTY THAT THIS REQUIREMENT SHALL APPLY CONTINUOUSLY AND NOT BE LIMITED TO NORMAL WORKING HOURS AND THAT THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DEFEND INDEMNIFY AND HOLD THE CLIENT, THE CONSUL 11NG ENGINEER AND 1HE CITY HARMLESS FROM ANY AND ALL LIABILITY, REAL OR ALLEGED, IN CONNECTION WITH 1HE PERFORMANCE OF WORK ON THIS PROJECT EXCEPTING FOR LIABILITY ARISING FROM THE SOLE NEGLIGENCE OF 7HE CLIENT OR THE CONSUL T1NG ENGINEER. TREE PROTECTION 1. PRIOR TO BEGINNING CONSIRUCT70N ON SITE, CONTRACTOR SHALL IDENTIFY AND PROTECT EXISTING TREES AND PLANTS DESIGNATED AS TO REMAIN. 2. PROTECT EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN FROM SPILLED CHEMICALS, FUEL OIL, MOTOR OIL, GASOLINE AND ALL 01HER CHEMICALLY INJURIOUS MATERIAL; AS WELL AS FROM PUDDLING OR CONTINUOUSLY RUNNING WA TER. SHOULD A SPILL OCCUR, STOP WORK IN THAT AREA AND CONTACT 7HE CITY'S ENGINEER/INSPECTOR IMMEDIATELY. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE TO MITIGATE DAMAGE FROM SPILLED MATERIAL AS WELL AS MATERIAL CLEAN UP. 3. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ONGOING MAINTENANCE OF AU TREES DESIGNA 7ED TO REMAIN AND FOR MAINTENANCE OF RELOCATED TREES STOCKPILED DURING CONSTRUCTION. CONTRACTOR WWLL BE REQUIRED TO REPLACE TREES THA T DIE DUE TO LACK OF MAINTENANCE. 4. REFER TO LANDSCAPE PLANS, SPEC/F1CA770NS OR ARBORIST REPORT FOR TREE PROIECTTON REQUIREMENTS AND MEASURES. PROJECT SITE MAINTENANCE 1. REMOVE ALL DIRT, GRAVEL, RUBBISH, REFUSE, AND GREEN WASTE FROM STREET PAVEMENT AND STORM DRAINS ADJOINING THE SITE. OMIT CONSTRUCTION ACCESS ROUTES ONTO THE SITE AND PLACE GRAVEL PADS AT THESE LOCATIONS DO NOT DRIVE VEHICLES AND EQUIPMENT OFF THE PAVED OR GRAVELED AREAS DURING WET WEATHER. 2. SWEEP OR VACUUM 1HE STREET PAVEMENT AND SIDEWALKS ADJOINING THE PROJECT SITE AND THE ON -SITE PAVED AREAS ON A DAILY BASIS. SCRAPE CAKED -ON MUD AND DIRT FROM THESE AREAS BEFORE SWEEPING. CORNERS AND HARD TO REACH AREAS SHALL BE SWEPT MANUALLY. 3. CREATE A CONTAINED AND COVERED AREA ON THE SITE FOR THE STORAGE OF BAGS, CEMENT, PAINTS, OILS, FERTILIZERS, PESTICIDES, OR OTHER MATRIALS USED ON 1HE SITE THAT HAVE THE POTENTIAL OF BEING DISCHARGED INTO THE STORM DRAIN SYSTEM THROUGH EITHER BEING WIND-BLOWN OR IN 1HE EVENT OF A MATERIAL SPILL. 4. NEVER CLEAN MACHINERY, EQUIPMENT OR TOOLS INTO A STREET GUTTER OR STORM DRAIN. 5. ENSURE THAT CEMENT TRUCKS, PAINTERS, OR STUCCO/PLASIER FINISHING CONTRACTORS DO NOT DISCHARGE WASH WATER FROM EQUIPMENT TOOLS OR RINSE CONTAINERS INTO GUTTERS OR DRAINS. AB AC AD ARV BC BFP BW CATV CB CcS CA CMP Co CY DCVA DI DIA DIP DWY (E) EG ELEC EP EVAE EX FC FDC FF FG FH FL Ell/ FS FT G GA GB GM GS HDPE HP IEE AGGREGATE BASE ASPHALT COVCRE7E AREA DRAIN AIR RELEASE VALVE BACK OF CURB BACKFLOW PREVENTER BOTTOM OF WALL CABLE TELEVISION CATCH BASIN CUBIC FEET PER SECOND CENTERLINE CORRUGATED METAL PIPE CLEANOUT CUBIC YARD DOUBLE CHECK VALVE ASSEMBLY DROP INLET DIAMETER DUCTILE IRON PIPE DRIVEWAY EAST EXISTING GRADE ELECTRICAL EDGE OF PATH EMERGENCY VEHICLE ACCESS EASEMENT EXISTING FACE OF CURB ARE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION FTNI.*IED FLOOR ELEVATION ANISHED GRADE ARE HYDRANT FLOW UNE FORCED MAIN ARE SERVICE FEET GAS GAUGE GRADE BREAK GAS METER GAS SERVICE HIGH -DENSITY POLYETHYLENE HIGH POINT INGRESS/EGRESS EASEMENT yUt__ NATIONAL EA3H•RE PROJECT SITE VICINITY MAP SHEET INDEX EK MT. DIABLO C-1.0 TOWN NOTES, PROJECT DATA AND LEGEND C-1.1 CONSTRUC170N NOTES C-2.0 TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY C-2.1 DEMOLITION PLAN C-3.0 GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN C-4.0 UTILITY PLAN C-5.0 EROSION CONTROL PLAN C-5.1 EROSION CONTROL DETAILS C-5.2 BLUEPRINT FOR CLEAN BAY C-6.0 CONSTRUCTION DETAILS C-6.1 CONSTRUCTION DETAILS TABLE OF PROPOSED PERVIOUS AND IMPERVIOUS AREAS TOTAL SITE AREA: 19,999 SF TOTAL SITE AREA DISTURBED: 6,183 SF (INCLUDING CLEARING, GRADING OR EXCA VA TING) EXISTING AREA (SF) PROPOSED AREA (SF) TOTAL AREA 'OST PROJECT (SF REPLACED NEW IMPERVIOUS AREA 692 0 3,403 3,403 TOTAL NEW & REPLACED IMPERVIOUS AREA 3,403 PERVIOUS AREA 19,307 692 16,596 16,596 ABBREVIATIONS IN INV LAT LG LP MAX MH MIN MPH N N. T..S O.C. a0. PAD PCC PERF PG&E PIED PL P0C PR PSDE PSE PSSE PUE PVC R RCP RIM R/W (S) S SCC INCH INVERT ELEVATION LATERAL UP OF GUTTER LOW POINT MAXIMUM MANHOLE MINIMUM MILES PER HOUR NORTH NOT TO SCALE ON GOER OUTSIDE DIAMETER PAD ELEVATION PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE PERFORATED PAGYf1C GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY PRIVATE INGRESS/EGRESS EASEMENT PROPERTY UNE POINT OF CONNECTION PROPOSED PRIVATE STORM DRAIN EASEMENT PUBLIC SERVICE EASEMENT PRIVATE SANITARY SENER EASEMENT PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT POLYVINYL CHLORIDE RAD/US REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE RIM ELEVATION RIGHT-OF-WAY SOUTH SLOPE SANTA CLARA COUNTY SCCFD SANTA CLARA COUNTY ARE DEPARTMENT SD STORM DRAIN SDCO SDE SDMH SDR SF S/WC SP.D STORM DRAIN CLEANOUT STORM DRAIN EASEMENT STORM DRAIN MANHOLE STANDARD DIMENSION RATIO SQUARE FEET SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY SEE PLUMBING DRAWINGS SS SSCO SSE SSMH STD s/W TC TELE TLC TW TYP VCP (W) NM N5 WV WVSD XING SANITARY SEWER SANITARY SEWER CLEANOUT SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE STANDARD SIDEWALK TOP OF CURB TELEPHONE TOWN OF LOS GATOS TOP OF WALL TYPICAL VITRIFIED CLAY PIPE WEST WATER WATER METER WATER SERVICE WATER VALVE WEST VALLEY SANITATION DISTRICT CROSSING REV.: DEC. 2015 0 N • w o cc Y W O ~ aw O p zw O = IF- U- w 0 emu, Jw w CD J I- zz ow 0 O Ln J W o� z O u_ zc� O z J < aQ Q• _J J - am Q (n J z0 W LL L.L.1z w w ao _C' CC 0• 0 CL d 0 z aLL v, 0 0L, zw "' cc a Jcc ao cc o w w= Ln 6- Ez o zL) - v z w oL) CCz Lr)o w 1-w LL J oQ zo op U J �w z O = (_)m 0Q w cc Q 00 �z w a ~a 0 o"- zw O J 0< z o= U ww m ow -• w O� C LL2 }z �a o m w o, z z � o O E • a t4-.3 0z y N O Cn 0 z N c c awe J Q Q J a) N¢ o 1-o F-a wCC1 0CC 0Io • I z o U oak 0 c) ENG\26 Alpine Avenue co CONSTRUCTION NOTES 1. ALL OFF —SITE CONSTRUCTION MATERIAL AND METHODS SHALL COMPLY WITH THE LATEST EDITION OF THE TOWN OF LOS GATOS AND THE LATEST CAL TRANS STANDARD PLANS & SPECIFICATIONS 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL LEAVE AN EMERGENCY PHONE NUMBER WITH THE TOWN OF LOS GATOS POLICE AND FIRE DEPARTMENTS. 3. CONTRACTOR SHALL POST ON THE SITE, EMERGENCY TELEPHONE NUMBERS FOR PUBLIC WORKS, AMBULANCE, POLICE, AND FIRE DEPARTMENTS 4. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY ALL PUBLIC OR PRIVATE UTILITY OWNERS 48 HOURS PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF WORK ADJACENT TO THE UTILITY UNLESS AN EXCAVATION PERMIT SPECIFIES OTHERWISE. 5. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL HIRE A STREET CLEANING CONTRACTOR TO CLEAN UP DIRT AND DEBRIS FROM CITY STREETS THAT ARE ATTRIBUTABLE TO THE DEVELOPMENT'S CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES 6. ALL GRADING SHALL BE PERFORMED IN SUCH A MANNER AS TO COMPLY WITH THE STANDARDS ESTABLISHED BY THE AIR QUALITY MAINTENANCE DISTRICT FOR AIRBORNE PART1CULA TES (DUST). Z ALL GRADING SHALL CONFORM TO APPROVED SPECIRCAT1ONS PRESENTED HEREON OR ATTACHED HERETO. ALL GRADING WORK SHALL BE OBSERVED AND APPROVED BY THE SOILS ENGINEER. THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER SHALL BE NOTTAED AT LEAST 48 HOURS BEFORE BEGINNING ANY GRADING. UNOBSERVED AND UNAPPROVED GRADING WORK SHALL BE REMOVED AND REDONE AT THE CONTRACTORS EXPENSE. 8. ALL MATERIALS, REQUIRED FOR THE COMPLETE EXECUTION OF THE PROJECT SHALL BE FURNISHED AND INSTALLED BY THE CONTRACTOR UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 9. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE ALL LIGHTS, SIGNS, BARRICADES, FLAGMEN OR OTHER DEVICES NECESSARY TO PROVIDE FOR PUBLIC SAFETY DURING THE CONSTRUCTION PERIOD. 10. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE TO REPAIR OR REPLACE ANY EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS OF UNDERGROUND FACILIT1ES DAMAGED DURING THE CONSTRUCTION PERIOD. 11. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAINING ALL ENCROACHMENT EXCAVATION, CONCRETE, ELECTRICAL, PLUMBING, ETC. PERMITS NECESSARY PRIOR TO BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION FOR ANY WORK. 12. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL HAVE A SUPERINTENDENT OR REPRESENTATIVE ON SITE AT ALL TIMES DURING CONSTRUCTION. 13. STORAGE OF CONSTRUCTION MATERIAL AND EQUIPMENT ON CITY STREETS WILL NOT BE PERMIT1ED. 14. CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT SHALL BE PROPERLY MUFFLED. UNNECESSARY IDLING OF GRADING CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT IS PROHIBITED. 15. CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT, TOOLS, ETC. SHALL NOT BE CLEANED OR RINSED INTO A STREET, GUTTER OR STORM DRAIN. 16. A CONTAINED AND COVERED AREA ON —SITE SHALL BE USED FOR STORAGE OF CEMENT BAGS, PAINTS, FLAMMABLE, OILS, FERTILIZERS, PEST1CIDES, OR ANY OTHER MATERIALS THAT HAVE POTENTIAL FOR BEING DISCHARGED TO THE STORM DRAIN SYSTEM BY WIND OR IN THE EVENT OF A MATERIAL SPILL. 1Z ALL CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS SHALL BE GATHERED ON A REGULAR BASIS AND PLACED IN A DUMPSTER WHICH IS EMPTIED OR REMOVED WEEKLY. WHEN FEASIBLE, TARPS SHALL BE USED ON THE GROUND TO COLLECT FALLEN DEBRIS OR SPLATTERS THAT COULD CONTRIBUTE TO STORMWATER POLLUTION. 18. ANY TEMPORARY ON —SITE CONSTRUCTION PILES SHALL BE SECURELY COVERED WITH A TARP OR OTHER DEVICE TO CONTAIN DEBRIS. 19. CONCRETE TRUCKS AND CONCRETE ANISHING OPERATIONS SHALL NOT DISCHARGE WASH WATER INTO THE STREET GUTTERS OR DRAINS. DISCREPANCIES IF THERE ARE ANY DISCREPANCIES BETWEEN DIMENSIONS IN DRAWINGS AND EXISTING CONDITIONS WHICH WILL AFFECT THE WORK, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BRING SUCH DISCREPANCIES TO THE ATTENTION OF THE ENGINEER FOR ADJUSTMENT BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR 1HE PROPER AT TING OF ALL WORK AND FOR THE COORDINATION OF ALL TRADES, SUBCONTRACTORS, AND PERSONS ENGAGED UPON THIS CONTRACT UTILITY/POTHOLE NOTE THE TYPES, LOCATIONS, SIZES AND /OR DEPTHS OF EXISTING UNDERGROUND UT1U77ES AS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE AND WERE OBTA/NED FROM SOURCES OF VARYING RELIABILITY. ONLY ACTUAL EXCAVATION WILL REVEAL 1HE TYPES, EXTENT SIZES, LOCATIONS AND DEPTHS OF SUCH UNDERGROUND UTILITIES. A REASONABLE EFFORT HAS BEEN MADE TO LOCATE AND DELINEATE ALL KNOWN UNDERGROUND UTTUT1ES HOWEVER, THE ENGINEER CAN ASSUME NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE COMPLETENESS OR ACCURACY OF ITS DEUNEA710N OF SUCH UNDERGROUND UTILITIES WHICH MAY BE ENCOUNTERED, BUT WHICH ARE NOT SHOWN ON THESE PLANS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR LOCATING ALL UNDERGROUND FACILITIES AND UTILITIES BY POTHOLING PRIOR TO COMMENCING CONSTRUCT10N. DIMENSIONS ALL DIMENSIONS ON THE PLANS ARE IN FEET OR DECIMALS THEREOF UNLESS SPECIFlCALL Y CALLED OUT AS FEET AND INCHES. Know what's below. CaII before you dig. ENCROACHMENT NOTE: A SEPARATE ENCROACHMENT PERMIT IS REQUIRED FOR ALL WORK WITHIN THE PUBLIC RIGHT—OF—WAY. IT IS THE CONTRACTORS RESPONSIBILITY TO OBTAIN THIS ENCROACHMENT PERMIT AND FOLLOW ALL CONSTRUCTION RELATED REQUIREMENTS OF SUCH PERMIT FLOODZONE THIS PROJECT IS IN FLOOD ZONE X: AREAS OUTSIDE OF 0.2Z ANNUAL CHANCE FLOOD. INFORMATION OBTAINED FROM 1HE FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP (ARM) NO. 06085C0376H DATED MAY 18, 2009 PRODUCED BY THE FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY (FEMA). FIRE DESIGN NOTE: THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DESIGN, PREPARE SHOP DRAWINGS FOR, OBTAIN ALL REQUIRED APPROVALS, AND CONSTRUCT THE ARE SYSTEM FOR THE PROPOSED PROJECT CONTRACTOR SHALL HAVE SHOP DRAWINGS STAMPED BY A RRE PROTECTION ENGINEER AS REQUIRED BY THE LOCAL AUTHORITY. UNDERGROUND WORK CAUTION CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT FOR LOCATION OF UNDERGROUND UTILITIES AT LEAST 48 HOURS PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION. FOR NORTHERN CALIFORNIA DIAL 811 OR (800) 227-2600. FOR OTHER AREAS CALL (800) 642-2444. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL EXISTING UTILITIES PRIOR TO BEGINNING ANY WORK ON THIS SITE. DEMOLITION NOTES 1. CONTRACTOR IS TO COMPLY WITH ALL GENERAL AND STATE REQUIREMENTS INVOLVING THE REMOVAL AND DISPOSAL OF HAZARDOUS MA TER/AL(S). 2. CONTRACTOR'S BID IS TO INCLUDE ALL VISIBLE SURFACE AND ALL SUBSURFACE FEATURES IDENT1FlED TO BE REMOVED OR ABANDONED IN THESE DOCUMENTS. 3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR A SITE INSPECTION TO FULLY ACKNOWLEDGE THE EXTENT OF 1HE DEMOLITION WORK. 4. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAINING ANY AND ALL PERMITS NECESSARY FOR ENCROACHMENT, GRADING, DEMOLITION, AND DISPOSAL OF SAID MATERIALS AS REQUIRED BY PRIVATE, LOCAL AND STATE JURISDICTIONS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PAY ALL FEES ASSOCIATED WITH THE DEMOUT10N WORK. 5. BACKALL ALL DEPRESSIONS AND TRENCHES FROM DEMOLITION TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER. 6. REMOVAL OF LANDSCAPING SHALL INCLUDE ROOTS AND ORGANIC MATERIALS TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER. Z PRIOR TO BEGINNING DEMOLITION WORK ACTIVITIES, CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES OUTLINED IN THE EROSION CONTROL PLAN & DETAILS AND THE PROJECT SWPPP IF APPLICABLE. 8. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN ALL SAFETY DEVICES, AND SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CONFORMANCE TO ALL LOCAL, STATE AND FEDERAL SAFETY AND HEALTH STANDARDS LAWS AND REGULATIONS. 9. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT FROM DAMAGE ALL EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS FACILITIES AND STRUCTURES WATCH ARE TO REMAIN. ANY ITEMS DAMAGED BY THE CONTRACTOR OR THEIR AGENTS OR ANY ITEMS REMOVED FOR HIS USE SHALL BE REPLACED IN EQUAL OR BETTER CONDITION AS APPROVED BY THE ARCHITECT OR OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE. 10. COORDINATE WITH ELECTRICAL, MECHANICAL, LANDSCAPING AND ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS FOR UTKITY SHUT—DOWN/DISCONNECT LOCATIONS. CONTRACTOR IS TO SHUT OFF ALL UTILITIES AS NECESSARY PRIOR TO DEMOLITION. CONTRACTOR IS TO COORDINATE SERVICE INTERRUPTIONS WITH THE UTIUTY OWNER AND ANY AFFECTED PROPERTIES OR BUILDINGS. SEE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR ADDITIONAL DEMOLITION SCOPE OF WORK. 11. THIS PLAN IS NOT INTENDED TO BE A COMPLETE CATALOGUE OF ALL EXISTING STRUCTURES AND UTKIT1ES. THIS PLAN INTENDS TO DISCLOSE GENERAL INFORMATION KNOWN BY THE ENGINEER AND TO SHOW THE OMITS OF THE AREA WHERE WORK WILL BE PERFORMED. THIS PLAN SHOWS THE EXISTING FEATURES TAKEN FROM A HELD SURVEY, HELD INVESTIGATIONS AND AVAILABLE INFORMATION. THIS PLAN MAY OR MAY NOT ACCURATELY REFLECT THE TYPE OR EXTENT OF THE ITEMS TO BE ENCOUNTERED AS THEY ACTUALLY EXIST WHERE EXISTING FEATURES ARE NOT SHOWN, IT IS NOT IMPLIED THAT THEY ARE NOT TO BE DEMOLISHED OR RELOCATED. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PERFORM A THOROUGH HELD INVESTIGATION AND REVIEW OF THE SITE WITHIN THE UMIT OF WORK SHOWN IN THIS PLAN SET TO DETERMINE THE TYPE, QUANTITY AND EXTENT OF ANY AND ALL ITEMS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR DETERMINING THE EXTENT OF EXISTING STRUCTURES AND UTILITIES AND QUANTITY OF WORK INVOLVED IN REMOVING THESE ITEMS FROM THE SITE 12. CONTRACTOR TO DEMOLISH AND REMOVE ALL IRRIGATION IN LANDSCAPE AREAS WHIN THE LIMIT OF WORK IF ANY IRRIGA 770N LINES OR MAINS ARE IN THE LIMIT OF WORK OR ARE DAMAGED THAT SERVE LANDSCAPE TO REMAIN, CONTRACTOR TO RECONNECT OR RELOCATE AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO OWNER. 13. PROTECT ALL EXIS77NG UT1UT1ES IN PLACE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. REPLACE ANY DAMAGED UTILITY TO REMAIN TO KEEP OPERABLE DURING CONSTRUCTION. 14. ALL UTILITY SHUT DOWNS ARE TO BE AVOIDED. IF SHUT DOWNS ARE NECESSARY, CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE SHUT DOWN WITH UTILITY OWNER WITH 48 HOUR MINIMUM NOTICE. 15. ALL EXIS77NG STORM DRAIN, SANITARY SEWER, AND WATER MAINS THAT SERVE EXIST1NG BUILDINGS MUST REMAIN OPERABLE DURING CONSTRUCTION. CONTRACTOR TO SET UP TEMPORARY SERVICE OR PUMP AS NECESSARY TO ENSURE UNINTERRUPTED SERVICE. RECORD DRAWING NOTE THE CONTRACTOR SHALL KEEP UP—TO—DATE AND ACCURATE A COMPLETE RECORD SET OF PRINTS OF THE CONTRACT DRAWINGS SHOWING EVERY CHANGE FROM 1HE ORIGINAL DRAWINGS MADE DURING THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION INCLUDING EXACT ANAL LOCATION, ELEVATION, SIZES, MATERIALS, AND DESCRIPTION OF ALL WORK RECORDS SHALL BE "REDUNED" ON A SET OF CONSTRUCTION PLAN DRAWINGS. A COMPLETE SET OF CORRECTED AND COMPLETED RECORD DRAWING PRINTS SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE CITY ENGINEER AND DEVELOPER'S CIVIL ENGINEER PRIOR TO ANAL ACCEPTANCE FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE CITY ENGINEER. APPLICABLE FIRE CODE NOTES APPLICABLE CODES AS OF JUL Y 14, 2014: 2013 CALIFORNIA BUILDING STANDARDS ADMINISTRATIVE CODE (PART 1, TITLE 24, CCR) 2013 CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE, VOLUMES 1 AND 2 (PART 2, 717-LE 24, CCR) (2012 EDITION INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODE) 2013 CALIFORNIA ELECTRICAL CODE (PART 3, TITLE 24, CCR) (2012 EDITION NAT10NAL ELECTRICAL CODE) 2013 CALIFORNIA MECHANICAL CODE (PART 4, TITLE 24, CCR) (2012 EDITION UNIFORM MECHANICAL CODE) 2013 CALIFORNIA PLUMBING CODE (PART 5, TITLE 24, CCR) (2012 EDITION UNIFORM PLUMBING CODE) 2013 CALIFORNIA ENERGY CODE (PART 6, TITLE 24, CCR) 2013 CALIFORNIA ELEVATOR SAFETY ORDERS (CHAPTER 4, TITLE 8, CCR) 2013 CALIFORNIA RRE CODE (PART 9, TITLE 24, CCR) 2013 CALIFORNIA REFERENCED STANDARDS CODE (PART 12, TITLE 24, CCR) TITLE 19 C.C.R., PUBLIC SAFETY STATE ARE MARSHAL REGULATIONS PARTIAL UST OF APPLICABLE STANDARDS: NFPA 13 — NFPA 14— NFPA 17A — NFPA 24 — NFPA 72 — (NOTE: SEE NFPA 253 — NFPA 20 — NFPA 99 — AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER SYSTEMS — 2013 EDIT10N STANDPIPE SYSTEMS — 2013 EDITION WET CHEMICAL SYSTEMS — 2013 EDITION PRIVATE FIRE MAINS — 2013 EDITION NATIONAL FIRE ALARM CODE (CALIFORNIA AMENDED) UL STANDARD 1971 FOR " VISUAL DEVICES) — 2013 EDITION CRITICAL RADIANT FLUX OF FLOOR COVERING SYSTEMS — 2011 EDITION STATIONARY PUMPS FOR ARE PROTECTION — 2013 EDITION HEALTH CARE FACILITIES — 2013 EDITION UNDERGROUND ARE SERVICE TO ARE HYDRANTS REQUIREMENTS: NFPA 24, SEC. 10.1.6.1: UNLESS THE REQUIREMENTS OF 10.1.6.2 ARE MET, ALL FERROUS METAL PIPE SHALL BE LINED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE APPLICABLE STANDARDS IN TABLE 10.1.1 NFPA 24, SEC. 10.3.6.2: ALL BOLTED JOINT ACCESSOR/ES SHALL BE CLEANED AND THOROUGHLY COATED WITH ASPHALT OR OTHER CORROSION —RETARDING MATERIAL AFTER INSTALLA TI0N. NFPA 24, SEC. 10.8.3.5:• CORROSION RESISTANCE. AFTER INSTALLATION, RODS, NUTS, BOLTS, WASHERS, CLAMPS, AND OTHER RESTRAINING DEVICES SHALL BE CLEANED AND THOROUGHLY COATED WITH BITUMINOUS OR OTHER ACCEPTABLE CORROSION —RETARDING MATERIAL. NFPA 24, SEC. 10.8.2:: THRUST BLOCKS SHALL BE CONSIDERED SATISFACTORY WHERE SOIL IS SUITABLE FOR THEIR USE. THRUST BLOCKS SHALL BE OF A CONCRETE MIX NOT LEANER THAN ONE PART CEMENT, TWO AND ONE HALF PARTS SAND, AND RVE PARTS STONE. THRUST BLOCKS SHALL BE PLACED BETWEEN UNDISTURBED EARTH AND THE ATTTNG TO BE RESTRAINED, AND SHALL BE CAPABLE OF RESISTING 1HE CALCULATED THRUST FORCES. WHEREVER POSSIBLE, THRUST BLOCKS SHALL BE PLACED SO THAT THE JOINTS ARE ACCESSIBLE FOR REPAIR. NFPA 24, SEC. 10.10.2.1: UNDERGROUND PIPING, FROM THE WA TER SUPPLY TO THE SYSTEM RISER, AND LEAD—IN CONNECTIONS TO THE SYSTEM RISER SHALL BE COMPLETELY FLUSHED BEFORE THE CONNECTION IS MADE TO THE DOWNSTREAM RRE PROTECT1ON SYSTEM PIPING. THE FLUSHING OPERATION SHALL BE CONTINUED FOR A SUFFICIENT TIME TO ENSURE THOROUGH CLEANING. THE MINIMUM RATE OF FLOW SHALL BE NOT LESS THAN THAT SPECIAED IN SECT10N 10.10.2.1.3. NFPA 24, SEC. 10.10.2.2.1: ALL PIPING AND ATTACHED APPURTENANCES SUBJECT TO SYSTEM WORKING PRESSURE SHALL BE HYDROSTATICALLY TESTED AT 200 PSI OR 50 PSI IN EXCESS OF THE SYSTEM WORKING PRESSURE, WHICHEVER IS GREATER, AND SHALL MAINTAIN THAT PRESSURE AT +/-5 PSI FOR 2 HOURS. NFPA 24, SEC 10.10.1: THE INSTALLING CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE FOLLOWING: (1) NOTIFYING THE AUTHORITY HAVING JURISDICTION AND THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE OF THE TIME AND DATE TESTING IS TO BE PERFORMED; (2) PERFORMING ALL REQUIRED ACCEPTANCE TESTS; (3) COMPLETING AND SIGNING THE CONTRACTOR'S MATERIAL AND TEST CERTIRCATE(S) SHOWN IN AGURE 10.10.1. NFPA 24, SEC. 10.4: THE DEPTH OF COVER OVER WATER PIPES SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN 2-1/2 FEET TO PREVENT MECHANICAL DAMAGE. PIPE UNDER DRI VEWA YS SHALL BE BURIED AT A MINIMUM DEPTH OF 3 FEET PIPE UNDER RAILROAD TRACKS SHALL BE BURIED AT A MINIMUM DEPTH OF 4 FEET NFPA 24, SEC. 10.6.1: PIPE SHALL NOT BE RUN UNDER BUILDINGS EXCEPT WHERE PERMITTED IN 10.6.2 AND 10.6.3 HAZARDOUS MATERIALS NOTE THERE MAY BE ASBESTOS CONTAINING PIPE AND PIPE INSTALLATION OR OTHER HAZARDOUS MATERIALS WITHIN THE PROJECT AREA. THE CONTRACTOR WILL PROTECT ALL HAZARDOUS CONTAINING ITEMS DURING THE EXECUTION OF THIS CONTRACT ADDITIONALLY THE CONTRACTOR WILL COMPLY WITH ALL LOCAL, STATE AND FEDERAL REGULATIONS REGARDING CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES NEAR HAZARDOUS MATERIALS CONSTRUCTION FENCE 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE A CONSTRUCTION FENCE AROUND THE ENTIRE AREA OF DEMOLITION AND CONSTRUCTION, INCLUDING ALL STAGING, STORAGE, CONSTRUCTION OFFICE AND LA YDOWN AREAS. 2. CONSTRUCTION FENCE SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF A 6' HIGH GALVANIZED CHAIN LINK WITH GREEN WINDSCREEN FABRIC ON THE OUTSIDE OF THE FENCE. 3. CONSTRUCTION FENCE ADDRESSED IN THESE NOTES IS ONLY FOR VISUAL CONFORMANCE OF THIS CONSTRUCT1ON SITE TO THE TOWN STANDARDS. CONTRACTOR MAY BE REQUIRED TO PROVIDE ADDIT10NAL FENCING, BARRICADES OR OTHER SAFETY DEVICES TO KEEP THE SITE SECURE AND SAFE. GENERAL UTILITY NOTES 1. ALL TRENCHES SHALL BE BACK FILLED PER THE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT OR UTILITY OWNERS STANDARD DETAILS AND SPECIFICATIONS 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL STAKE LOCATION OF ABOVE GROUND UTILITY EQUIPMENT (TRANSFORMER, GAS METER, ETC.) . PLANNING DEPARTMENT MUST SPECIFlCALL Y AGREE WITH LOCATION PRIOR TO PROCEEDING IMTN ANY REVISIONS TO APPROVED LOCA T1ONS. 3. CATHODIC PROTECTION SHALL BE REQUIRED ON ALL METALLIC FITTINGS AND ASSEMBLIES THAT ARE IN CONTACT WITH THE SOIL, UNLESS SPECIFlCALL Y DEEMED UNNECESSARY BY 1HE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE TO FULLY ENGINEER AND INSTALL THIS SYSTEM AND COORDINATE ANODE AND TEST STATION LOCATIONS WITH THE UTILITY OWNER. 4. COMPLETE SYSTEMS: ALL UTILITY SYSTEMS ARE DELINEATED IN A SCHEMATIC MANNER ON THESE PLANS. CONTRACTOR IS TO PROVIDE ALL AT77NGS, ACCESSOR/ES AND WORK NECESSARY TO COMPLETE THE UTILITY SYSTEM SO THAT IT IS FULLY FUNCTIONING FOR THE PURPOSE INTENDED. 5. UNDERGROUND UTILITIES OR STRUCTURES ARE SHOWN IN THEIR APPROXIMATE LOCATIONS AND EXTENT BASED UPON RECORD INFORMATION. LOCATIONS MAY NOT HAVE BEEN VERIFlED IN THE AELD AND NO GUARANTEE IS MADE TO THE ACCURACY OR COMPLETENESS OF THE INFORMATION SHOWN. THE CLIENT, BY ACCEPTING THESE PLANS OR PROCEEDING WITH IMPROVEMENTS PURSUANT THERETO, AGREES TO ASSUME LIABILITY AND TO HOLD UNDERSIGNED HARMLESS FOR ANY DAMAGES RESULTING FROM THE EXISTENCE OF UNDERGROUND UTILITIES OR STRUCTURES NOT REPORTED TO THE UNDERSIGNED; NOT INDICATED ON THE PUBLIC RECORDS EXAMINED, LOCATED AT VARIANCE ;MTH THOSE REPORTED OR SHOWN ON RECORDS EXAMINED. 6. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL EXISTING INVERT ELEVATIONS FOR STORM DRAIN AND SANITARY SEWER CONSTRUCTION PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF ANY WORK ALL WORK FOR STORM AND SANITARY SEWER INSTALLATION SHALL BEGIN AT THE DOWNSTREAM CONNECTION POINT. THIS WILL ALLOW FOR ANY NECESSARY ADJUSTMENTS TO BE MADE PRIOR TO THE INSTALLATION OF THE ENTIRE LINE. IF THE CONTRACTOR FAILS TO BEGIN AT THE DOWNSTREAM CONNECTION POINT AND WORK UP —STREAM, AND SHALL PROCEED AT HIS OWN RISK AND BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY ADJUSTMENTS NECESSARY Z EXISTING UTILITY CROSSINGS OF NEW PIPELINE ARE SHOWN ACCORDING TO THE BEST AVAILABLE INFORMATION. GAS, WATER AND SEWER SERVICE LATERALS ARE SHOWN ACCORDING TO THE BEST AVAILABLE INFORMATION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY THE TYPE, SIZE, LOCATION AND DEPTH OF ALL THE UT1UTY CROSSING (BOTH MAINS AND LATERALS) ARE CORRECT AS SHOWN. NO GUARANTEE IS MADE THAT ALL EXISTING UTILITIES (BOTH MAINS AND LATERALS) ARE SHOWN. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL EXERCISE CAUTION WHEN EXCAVATING AND SHALL PROTECT ALL EXISTING U77UT1ES (BOTH MAINS AND LATERALS) FROM DAMAGE DUE TO HIS OPERATION. 8. VERTICAL SEPARATION REQUIREMENTS (UNLESS SPECIACALLY SHOWN OTHERWISE ON PLANS): A MINIMUM OF SIX (6) INCHES VERTICAL CLEARANCE, MEASURED FROM OUTSIDE EDGE OF PIPE, SHALL BE PROVIDED BETWEEN CROSSING UTILITY PIPES, EXCEPT THAT THE MIN/MUM VERT1CAL CLEARANCE BETWEEN WATER AND SANITARY SEWER PIPELINES SHALL BE 12 INCHES AND ALL NEW WATER PIPES SHALL BE TYPICALLY INSTALLED TO CROSS ABOVE/OVER EXISTING SANITARY SEWER PIPELINES. WHERE NEW WATER PIPELINES ARE REQUIRED TO CROSS UNDER EXISTING AND/OR NEW SANITARY SEWER PIPELINES, THE MIN/MUM VERTICAL SEPARATION SHALL BE 12 INCHES. WATER LINE PIPE ENDS SHALL BE INSTALLED NO CLOSER THAN 10' MIN/MUM HORIZONTAL DISTANCE FROM CENTERLINE OF UTILITY CROSSINGS, WHERE FEASIBLE. 9. HORIZONTAL SEPARA770N REQUIREMENTS (UNLESS SPECIRCALLY SHOWN OTHERWISE ON PLANS): A MINIMUM HORIZONTAL SEPARATION BETWEEN NEW PIPELINES AND ANY EXISTING UTKIT1ES SHALL BE 5' FEET EXCEPT THAT THE MIN/MUM HORIZONTAL SEPARATION FOR WATER AND SANITARY SEWER MAIN PIPELINES SHALL BE 10' MINIMUM. A MINIMUM HORIZONTAL SEPARATION BETWEEN NEW PIPELINES AND JOINT TRENCH SHALL BE 5 FEET 10. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CONTACTING APPROPRIATE UT1LIT1ES AND REQUEST1NG VERIRCAT1ON OF SERVICE POINTS, HELD VERIFlCAT1ON OF LOCATION, SIZE, DEPTH, ETC. FOR ALL THEIR FACILIT1ES AND TO COORDINATE WORK SCHEDULES. 11. ANY EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITY ONES TO BE ABANDONED, SHALL BE REMOVED FROM WITHIN THE PROPOSED BUILDING ENVELOPE AND THEIR ENDS CAPPED OUTSIDE OF THE BUILDING ENVELOPE. 12. ANY PIPING TO BE ABANDONED IN PLACE SHALL BE RUED WITH GROUT AND CAPPED. PAVEMENT SECTIONS 1. SEE STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS FOR BUILDING SLAB SECTIONS AND PAD PREPARATIONS 2. SEE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT FOR ALL FLATWORK AND VEHICULAR PAVEMENT SECTIONS AND BASE REQUIREMENTS 3. THE ANAL OR SURFACE LAYER OF ASPHALT CONCRETE SHALL NOT BE PLACED UNTIL ALL ON —SITE IMPROVEMENTS HAVE BEEN COMPLETED, INCLUDING ALL GRADING, AND ALL UNACCEPTABLE CONCRETE WORK HAS BEEN REMOVED AND REPLACED, UNLESS OTHERWISE APPROVED BY THE CITY ENGINEER AND/OR DEVELOPER'S CIVIL ENGINEER. 4. ALL PAVING SHALL BE IN CONFORMANCE WITH SECTION 26 "AGGREGATE BASE" AND SECTION 39 "ASPHALT CONCRETE" PER LATEST EDITION OF CAL TRANS STANDARD SPECIRCA T7ONS. EARTHWORK NOTE IT SHALL BE THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO INCLUDE ALL MATERIAL AND LABOR REQUIRED WITHIN THE BID PRICE, FOR EARTHWORK CONSTRUCTION, TO CARRY OUT THE CUT/F1LL AND/OR IMPORT/EXPORT AS NECESSARY TO MEET THE DESIGN GRADES SHOWN ON THE PLANS. CONTRACTOR IS TO DELIVER TO OWNER THE PROJECT IN A COMPLETE AND OPERATIONAL MANNER. EARTHWORK QUANTITIES SHOWN ON THE PLANS OR REPRESENTED BY THE ENGINEER ARE APPROXIMATE AND ARE FOR GRADING PERMIT APPROVAL ONLY. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY INVESTIGATION OR STUDIES THAT ARE REQUIRED BY THE CONTRACTOR TO SATISFY THIS REQUIREMENT NO ADDITIONAL COMPENSA770N SHALL BE PAID FOR SAID CUT/FlLL AND/OR IMPORT/EXPORT. w Zu I 06o 0 co No m o rn Owl <0_ = . x c� w JANUARY 24, 2017 w 1- 0 0 z w 0 z cc 0 w w 0 w U 0 z LO O LO PROJECT NO.: PLAN FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF NE AVENUE V ) N L. LLI O (' 0 Z z Z° Oa U_ a a U w DN 0 WC a w Z O= U PARKS AND PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT TOWN OF LOS GATOS www.sandis.net 1700 S. Winchester Blvd, Suite 200, Campbell, CA 95008 I P. 408.636.0900 I F.408.636.0999 Lw r 0 1010 MI *WI II %1I1*�1 AST BAYM >- m REVISIONS i C-1.1 of 11 REV.: DEC. 2015 20 vim cc w 0 x O cc 0z z_ Y W Occ Q W CC O p W O x a W w p w Jam, w C0 CO O zz 0 W z o J W Lc, 0 0 Z W z0 O z E • Q d Q _J J J - m = Q (n J Z O cW LL CCz cf w w U w 1 w <0 CC_ 01- LU• z O O C- ▪ 0 p O Ln O z w OL) • z cc a J cc Q p LL OCL >- W W_ Q ~ In 0 z O - z cLJ E. z v z w p O L) 0z a- �o = w LL W O -� z Q O 0 O U J � w F v) y^ O J - oQ w cc O 0 Oz Q _> 1z 0a o 0 I"- o W zw O J 0 < = O U w w w Ow - W CC 0 •� ›-z Ja mCCJZ) zz O doh Nam, LLLJ _ E J a O(r) U0� QI o > Q z LLJ J O ooN LLJ z N < Q J N < LLJ 0 F-ak LLJ • O Qc�O I ono a• s CC= I z o U O Qz k U ENG\26 Alpine Avenue co Ui qze ▪ 17 • 394.99 Cr) LL Know what's below. Call before you dig. .11 (‹, 54"EUC 385.30 395.86 392.19 04 cse 396.49 082.10 399.27 398.54 380.18 398.43 382.86 ti4 400.83 400.11 ® 400.97 382.31 C/csolv 380.05 409.09 383.24 376.77 410.89 crl 382.90 388.24 387.64 412.75 • 19.35 79 382.67 405.42 394.90 • 413.30 380 ® 382.69 0 378 APN 529-37-043 404.74 390.6 420. 421.17 386.36 384.60 378.03 0 0 41335 385.56 391.05 TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY NOTES I. EXISTING TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY INFORMATION SHOWN HEREON IS BASED UPON TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEYS COMPLEIED BY WESTFALL ENGINEERS, INC., UNDER THE 2. UTILITIES SHOWN ON THIS SURVEY ARE BASED ON SURFACE OBSERVATIONS. NO WARRANITES ARE EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED CONCERNING THE EXISTENCE, SIZE, DEPTH, CONDITION, CAPACITY OR LOCAITON OR ANY UTILITY EXISTING ON IHE SITE, WHETHER PRIVATE, MUNICIPAL, OR PUBLIC OWNED. 3. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL UTILIITES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION AND REPORT BACK TO CIVIL ENGINEER ANY DISCREPANCIES IMTH PLAN PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF WORK 4. MEE LOCATIONS SHOWN HEREON ARE SHOWN SYMBOLICALLY 119TH SYMBOL SIZES BASED UPON TRUNK DIAMETER AT CHEST HBGHT, AT THE LOCATION WHERE THE MEE EWERS IHE GROUND SURFACE. LOCAIIONS AND SIZES OF 7REE IRUNKS CAN ONLY BE CONSIDERED APPROXIMATE UNLESS OTHERWISE STATED ON IHE MAP. ALL DBH'S WERE DERIVED FROM HAND MEASURED CIRCUMFERENCES TAKEN BY GARETH BENCHMARK CONTROL NOTE THE VERTICAL DATUM FOR THIS SURVEY IS A TOWN OF LOS GATOS BENCHMARK, LG36: FOUND BRASS DISK IN MONUMENT WELL, LOCATED AT THE INTERSECTION OF EAST MAIN AND CHURCH STREET. UNDERGROUND UTILITY NOTE IHE TYPES, LOCATIONS, SIZES AND/OR DEPTHS OF EXISING UNDERGROUND UTILITIES AS SHOWN ON MIS TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY ARE APPROXIMATE AND WERE OBTAINED FROM SOURCES OF VARYING RELIABILITY ONLY ACTUAL EXCAVATION NEL REVEAL THE TYPES, EXTENT, SIZES, LOCATIONS AND DEPIHS OF SUCH UNDERGROUND (MUTES. A REASONABLE EFFORT HAS BEEN MADE TO LOCATE AND DELINEATE ALL KNOWN UNDERGROUND UTILITIES. HOWEVER, THE ENGINEER CAN ASSUME NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE COMPLEIENESS OR ACCURACY OF ITS DELINEATION OF SUCH UNDERGROUND UTILITIES WI-11CH MAY BE ENCOUNTERED, BUT WHICH ARE NOT SHOWN ON THIS SURVEY 398.31 385.37 5.64 385.81 63 CD LLJ LLJ JANUARY 24, 2017 LLJ LLJ Lu Lu PROJECT NO.: PLAN FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF NE AVENUE Lll LID CC 0 CL CC z cc CL PARKS AND PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT TOWN OF LOS GATOS te gla 41 le ml www.sandis.net 1700 S. Winchester Blvd, Suite 200, Campbell, CA 95008 I P. 408.636.0900 I F.408.636.0999 LLJ 1010 MI *WI II %1I1*�1 AST BAYM >- co REVISIONS REV.: DEC. 2015 20 W � w 0 z (z z - w K O J aw � z c O O z u„ o1- uo w V J- z w w m Ow z p w zJ Qo J V) 1- O z� LL oz V d a Q H J J J m = Q cc V)J z w co -z Eulw mw = V w _0- cc cc_ 1- w O O c▪ cc o0 NO O U uJ Nz cc a2 J o J O O • a LJ Q 1- V')= zI= sz O (..)j zw I z w U C N �W LL O¢ 00 n w ril N w O - m = Ow Lu z tzs 713 O) 0u w J O zzh ao� LuI-� boo S ON a= �zN Q > az> "2 Qi 0 J w (/7 w z z Nw3 Qw Q J (^� N=mil w N a(..)p Qcr) CC � w OLu �oLLJ 0 1- =N zoV oQ� ti a Cb Q ab .0 �Q Q N 0 N Q/ci ss 392.46 EXISTING WATER VALVE To EXISTING FlRE TO REMAIN 3 EXISTING WATER METER TO REMAIN PJ��J<(/ Gc2 1,SAWWCUT -OR UTILITY TREN c9c7 EX! DRIVEWAY TO REMAIN. PROTECT IN PLACE STIN STONE CQ�UMN TO 0�. REMAIN _ _ / EXIS71N STONE COLUMN TO REMAIN / / .69 / T 54"EUC 0 Z 385.30 CURB GU= R • � OR UTILITY ► TRENCH 395.86 0,97 0 PQ 399.27 / / / 380.22 , 380.15 379.02 M/34 381.23 ✓q / 380.51 / • 380.18 / / 400.06' EXISTING - DRIVEWAY TO REMAIN. PROTECT IN PLACE 398.431' '4' / s, . s1900.83 9 / 9' w 9 9' 03.85 9' sfr V382.58 PARK.SIGN 382.43 376.11 379.46 380.05 382.98 sir 383.24 01/ 6.25 'OAK sir sir sir sir sir sir sir 10.4 sfr sir sir sir sir ?'404.48 9, sfr 414.4E \fr sj\ sir sir sfr sfr \' sir sir sir sif 4,�Q 9' • 41`2'.32 sir 382.47 sir sir 395.71 sir sir sir sir '12.75 \fr y .89 9' 410.16 <514 0 382.79 -f- a 382.90 . 3 jp383.51 419.35 86.45 38 12.80 405.42 398 396 394 392 390 388 386 384 APN 529-37-043 LL sr 420.25 413.30 406 408 410 404.74 404 402 3 -378 383.79 390.6 378 380 0 421.17 .69 0 386.36 384.60 378.03 0 0 50"7 391.05 385.64 DEMOLITION LEGEND DEMOLISH AND REMOVE AC PAVING AND ANY ASSOCIATED BASEROCK. STABILIZE IHE EXISING SUBGRADE DEMOLISHED MATERIAL MAY BE USED AS BASEROCK IF APPROVED BY GEOTECHNICAL ENG/NEER. DEMOLISH AND REMOW CONCRETE INCLUDING ANY ASSOCIATED BASEROCK MAY BE USED AS BASEROCK IF APPROVED BY THE GEOIECHNICAL ENGINEER. CLEAR AND GRUB EXISING LANDSCAPE AREA SO NO ORGANICS ARE SI1LL PRESENT • • LIMIT OF WORK LINE SAWCUT SAWCUT LINE, CONMACTOR SHALL SAWCUT f TH A NEAT, CLEAN EDGE. SAWCUT CONCRETE AT NEAREST JOINT TO SAWCUT LINE SHOWN ON PLAN. DEMO AND REMOVE EXISING CURB AND GUTTER, INCLUDING ANY REMOVE EXISIING FENCE INCLUDING ASSOCIATED FOOINGS. RETURN FENCE ovwws. TO OWNER. AND REQUIREMENTS. IF PRESSURIZED UMITY CONIRACTOR SHALL HAVE COMPETENT PROFESSIONAL DESIGN PIPE RESTRAINTS EXISING MEE TO REMAIN, PROIECT IN PLACE. SEE LANDSCAPE PLANS AND 0 co LLJ JANUARY 24, 2017 Lu ince LLI LU Lu co Lu VD UD rA PROJECT NO.: LU 0 ARCHITECTURE AND SITE APPLICATION NO. S-16-052 PARKS AND PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT TOWN OF LOS GATOS ce cu Ica ui IC www.sandis.net 1700 S. Winchester Blvd, Suite 200, Campbell, CA 95008 I P. 408.636.0900 I F.408.636.0999 Lu AST BAY67 >- co REVISIONS REV.: DEC. 2015 20 c. � w 0 z x � Y w c o~ Q� 0 0 Z w o x I- I- L., o w w (3 m J ow zz 0 w z J Q o ›- 0 0 Z c0' o z 0 E aQ Q• _J J J m (f) J 1cc - z w w0 V w I-w <0 CC n CCI- 0• o o0z L^0 0 w L, ") z wa � aJo u_ ow w= wLn z6- Ez 0 zw v z w 0 cz Lo w 1-w w zo 0 U• cc J w F- O u- m oQ cc Q 0 V z w �z a o = o0- un w O J 0 zQ o= V w • w m ow w 01•- LL Qo >z Ja E 0 m z z a o� do N w w ciCC) Q c▪ ol 0I c� Q W o z Ln43 awe J 0 Q J_ `n¢Ow ol Q0 F- Lf)Lu CC QU� < w ono t`i a▪ s cc= z o U oar ENG\26 Alpine Avenue 3 G cory 393. \ \ " 4' \ \ \ \ 1.50 \ \ \ \ ›/ \\\ � 395.0 / _ _ P 395.81 5.00 P 395.01 MATCH0EX P 396.01 GJ� / 20.00/ / / P 398.0 FG 396.00 P 395.52 / r . 94.5t �/ o � • FG 394.11 % / •y. 3g4` e4-14e4F / / G 3 0 400.9/ IFI%♦ 82 fr � DISSIPA TOR „ v ♦ ♦ .'�F� `O , -.44111W, 4 MIN DIA RIP o, F 95.01 r& Q 6'RAP 3#15 � F(1.•394.,5t` ; �� DBE - °� Q n _ ♦ . . A s/p p� ♦ . . . .♦♦♦ . / / / 5� 397.00 MATCH EX. P 402.81: / / P 401.2 • ♦ 402.75. -tG 4 2;00 - 403'00. FG 405,70 // // Orb6h NC) / MATCH EX. • FG 403.01 406.25 30°r MATCH EX 36 FG 408.51 rck 0 FG 403.33 IoPD0 NSE .69 FG . 94.01 30' 385.30 FG 393. 382.98 0 383.60 09 sg\DGE GURB GU= R t 15' SETBACK p2 A' 0 381 0 FG 380.21 380.15 381.61 0 381.39 8"TREE TMGK BRus" Pj1�4 //0 381.23 379.02 FG 382.01 380.51 • 380.18 TS 399.0 FG 382.11 (D 380.86 ooO 0 381.05 14- 09 380 378 6 0 381.03 `90 11 op/382.58 PARK.SIGN 382.43 8Q.17 A 376.11 379.46 PA770 I i FF=403.5 PORCH 380.05 382.98 0 38 7 0 383.24 414.46 407.94 5'X ENER DISSIPA TOR W/ 4' N DIA RIP RAP 376.77 . 382.47 • Jp383.51 •E) FL 417.00 FL 409.24 O MATCH EX Q411.0t FL 407.97 0 394.45 7 392.04 0 392.41 �i NMATCH 382.90 FF389. HEX F 389.0t 86.45 . 383 RR 382.67 383.79 38"8724. 387.64 (E)ADJ HsE. 404- 400 398 396 394.90 394 392 390 388 386 384 382 378 380 406 378 15' SETBACK 390.6 AO 402 3 380 377.37 Q 382.69 S0 ,- 421.17 420.25 413.75 13.11 50"EU • 69 411.83 0 386.36 384.60 O 378.03 0 0 . 385.56 385.1 GRADING PLAN LEGEND CONCRETE PAVING ASPHALT CONCRETE PAVING LANDSCAPE AREA, SEE LANDSCAPE PLANS FOR DETAILS PERVIOUS PAVERS SAWCUT SAWCUT LINE, CONTRACTOR SHALL SAWCUT WITH A NEAT, CLEAN EDGE. I'v SAWCUT CONCRETE AT NEAREST JOINT TO SAWCUT LINE SHOWN ON PLAN. RETAINING WALL, SEE STRUCTURAL PLANS FOR DETAILS LIMIT OF WORK LINE - GRADE BREAK GENERAL GRADING NOTES 1. PROVIDE POSITIVE SURFACE DRAINAGE AWAY FROM ALL STRUCTURES BY SLOPING ALL HARDSCAPE SURFACES AT 22* AND LANDSCAPE SURFACES AT 5Z AWAY FROM STRUCTURES UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON PLANS. 2. STRUCTURE WALLS: PER CBC 2304.11.2.2 (WOOD SUPPORTED BY FOUNDA T10N) PROVIDE 8' MINIMUM CLEAR TO EXTERIOR GRADE. 3. ALL FILL, IMPORT SOILS AND GRADING SHALL BE IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT PERFORMED BY POLLAK ENGINEERING, INC., DATED 5 AUGUST 2016, PROJECT NUMBER 1138. 4. COORDINA 7F THE PLACEMENT OF ALL SLEEVES FOR LANDSCAPE IRRIGA 770N (WA TER AND CONTROL WIRING) AND SITE LIGHTING PRIOR TO THE PLACEMENT OF ANY ASPHALT, BASEROCK OR CONCRETE SURFACING. SEE LANDSCAPING AND SITE ELECTRICAL DRAWINGS. 5. ROUGH GRADING TO BE WITHIN 0.1' AND FINISH GRADES ARE TO BE WITHIN 0.05, HOWEVER CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT CONSTRUCT ANY IMPROVEMENTS THAT WILL CAUSE WATER TO POND OR NOT MEET REQUIREMENTS IN GRADING NOTE #1 OR THE ADA REQUIREMENTS BELOW DO NOT ADJUST GRADES ON THIS PLAN WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN APPROVAL OF THE ENGINEER/ARCHITECT. 6. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL EXERCISE EXTREME CARE TO CONFORM TO 7HE ONES, GRADES, SEC77ONS, AND DIMENSIONS AS SET FORTH ON THESE PLANS. ALL GRADED AREAS SHALL CONFORM TO THE VERTICAL ELEVATIONS SHOWN WITH A TOLERANCE OF ONE -TENTH OF A FOOT WHERE GRADED AREAS DO NOT CONFORM TO THESE TOLERANCES, THE CONTRACTORS SHALL BE REQUIRED TO DO CORRECTIVE GRADING, AT NO EXTRA COST TO 1HE CLIENT/OWNER. Z IT SHALL BE THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO CONFIRM THE GROUND ELEVA 17ONS AND OVERALL TOPOGRAPHY OF THE SITE PRIOR TO THE START OF CONSTRUCTION AS TO 7HE ACCURACY BETWEEN THE WORK SET FORTH ON THESE PLANS AND 7HE WORK IN 7HE FlELD. ANY DISCREPANCIES SHALL BE IMMEDIA TEL Y BROUGHT TO THE ATTENT10N OF THE CONSTRUCTION MANAGER AND CIVIL ENGINEER IN WRI7TNG PRIOR TO START OF CONSTRUCT1ON WHICH MAY REQUIRE CHANGES IN DESIGN AND/OR AFFECT THE EARTHWORK QUANTITIES. 8. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE TO REPAIR OR REPLACE ANY EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS OF UNDERGROUND FACILITIES DAMAGED DURING 7HE CONSTRUCTION PERIOD. 9. THE RISE/ RUN/ STEP COUNT IS FOR REFERENCE ONLY. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ELEVA T7ONS AND BUILDING CODE COMPLIANCE PRIOR TO ANY WORK. 10. AREAS LACKING TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMA 7TON (ELEVA TOONS) HAVE BEEN INTERPOLATED USING STANDARD ENGINEERING METHODS. CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY ALL ELEVATIONS AT CONFORMS PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF CONSTRUCT1ON AND REPORT BACK ANY DISCREPANCIES TO THE CIVIL ENGINEER. 11♦ ADJUST ANY MANHOLE OR UT1LITY STRUCTURES TO PROPOSED GRADE PRIOR TO INSTALLING FINAL LIFT OF AC OR POURING CONCRETE. 0 N w JANUARY 24, 2017 w 1- 0 w Q U 0 z C7 w 0 z Q 0 w w 0 w U 0 z LO 0 1- LO 1- PROJECT NO.: PARKS AND PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT TOWN OF LOS GATOS www.sandis.net 1700 S. Winchester Blvd, Suite 200, Campbell, CA 95008 I P. 408.636.0900 I F.408.636.0999 w H 0 AST BAYM >- m REVISIONS i C-3.O of 11 REV.: DEC. 2015 20 cc w �w 0 x � Y w ccx O ~ O p o x w w O w U - am, w CD ow zz p w z J • o J w Lc,_ 0 0 �LL z c0' o z J CC aQ Q• _J J_ J Q CO (n J Z p w w LLJcf w U w ao c1- w z 0 O cc o0 Q,� 0 zw oL, CC CC Qo w w ow w= U- V) (D� oz o �� z- w ( z w CCz V)o w 1-w LL_J oQ op U J �w F- y O J m LL OQ LLJ c 00 L.)z w ~a CC o �"- o"- w O J 0 = O V w w CO O w - w•CC 0= I- p 0 a-0 Crl do Nam, w o ▪ 00 wx) oiI u >� • z N o(v•-c L z N Lc) w QLL CI .6 Q J_ xQ w x Q Qo : �< w1; CC z J L9ok. Q w I ono a� CC=1- I z o U O Q k (-) CO ENG\26 Alpine Avenue MH RIM INV IN 394.38 INV THRU 394.21 NEW SEWER £4TERAL CONNEC120 EX1.71NG R LINE / /c, 4 PROPOSED ELECTRICAL AND GAS LINE CONNECT TO EX ELECTRICAL AND GAS m�/ )hv T ALP/NE A I NUE / 394.99 92 42 PROPOSED WATER LINE CONNECT TO EX. WA TER METER. 0 M N LL L� z a / / Y r 38 co . CO IE�PD� NgE .69 / INV 3' - ti 3g4.49 £lRGY-DISSIPA TOR MIN DIA. RIPRAP APPROX/MA LOCATION EXISTING %E1TERLINE EXISTING CURB AND GUTTER / EXISTING SIDEWALK �kRTY/ R/c, /T-' -WAY LINE / 395.86 43LFN6" PVC \ SDR-35 S=0.058 o3 8LFN6" PVC SDR-351 391.44 389 8 JOINT TREIkH FOR NEW UNDERGRO ND SERVICE (GAS, ELE TRIC, ETC.) 382.98 Q 383.60 ,00 GURB GU-“e" / SLASH BLOCK/ ENERGY DISSIPA TOR 3a6. ,6 FOR ALL DOWNOUTS (TYP.) 384.07 \ \ 95 44* 380.15 380.51 d- \ 1 ^oy h V 375.14 339.67 j1i34 381.61 0 381.39 8"TREE O� G� Q� 374.76 37sg 1N\GK BRUs" 379.02 .00 Q 382.06 '�G p 382.44 38'��81.23 �� 0/382.58 387 73 n381.75 Q�� 2c. , PARK.SIGN 0 II 11 38��hi, 04 382.43 / / LF,-,6" PVC SDR-35 S=0.194 v4 3 S RIM 399.50 INV 39Z50 / 23LF 6" PVC i SD35 =0.083 N.10" 6>;\> 0 RIM 396.00 INV 395.00 S.P.D. FOR CON71NUA710N 25 LF 4" PVC PERFPIPE 6" SS P.O.C. P.D. PLANS'OR CONTINUATION SSCO RIM 391.49 •2IN86V 388.49 3LFN4" PVC SDR-26 380.59 380.18 %382.31 or Oft 07380.86 �00 0 381.05 -74 O,, 0 1r WOO O 381.03 �0 • ftN • 380.17 Op OFBA/VA- 0 3�89, 760 376.11 qy 082.1° JACKSON AVENUE 382.13 / • / 1 4, O406.25 30"OAK SPLASH BLOCK/ ENERGY oDISSIPATOR FOR ALL DOWNSPOUTS (TYP.) 4" PVC 404.37 / PERF PIPE / / / / / / / / / / 6" SD P.O.C. S.P.D. PLANS FOR CONTINUATION 6" SD P.O.C. S.P.D. PLANS FOR CONTINUATION 8LFN6" PVC SDR-35 0 S=0.0376 • • 379.46 graias 380.74 0 380.05 5'X5' ENERGY DISSIPA TOR W/ 4" MIN DIA. RIPRAP O INV 400.33 0 384.52 4141111 4441 381 ?, i (404.48 INV 407.00 7LFN6" PVC SDR-35 S=0.0376 0 407.94 18"OAK 4 0 395.24 3OLFN6" PVC 78�- 382Se MU<is/ TR1Vke vOkYF 382.98 382.74 383.24 TOp 376.77 382.47 4 0 382.79 0 382.64 383.15 401.58 4" PVC PERF PIPE 7.4 7.44 • \ ALL °no' DOWNSPOUTS • SDAD RIM 405.00 INV 403.0P 405.42 377.19 • • 86.45 3813724 387.64 394.90 0 385.24 377.37 380 dO 420.25 390.63 sow Goo 383.85 382.67 \=2.80 41.. 3/4"IP PLUG 0 421.17 0 396.17 219t"Q1/113°8367.386.03 J 69 384.60 0 0 • 413.75 385.56 STORM DRAIN NOTES 1. PRIVATE STORM DRAIN LINE 4-INCH THROUGH 12-INCH WITH A MINIMUM OF TWO (2) FEET OF COVER IN NON-TRAFRC AREAS SHALL BE POLYWNYL CHLORIDE (PVC) SDR 35 GREEN PIPE AND SHALL CONFORM TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF ASTM DESIGNAIION D 3034-73 IWTH BELLS AND SPIGOT CONNECIIONS. ALL DIRECIION CHANGES SHALL BE MADE IWTH WYE CONNECTONS, 225' ELBOWS, 45* ELBOWS OR LONG SWEEP ELBOWS, 90* ELBOWS AND TEE'S ARE PROHIBITED. 2. PRIVATE STORM DRAIN LINE 6-INCH THROUGH 12-INCH POTH LESS THAN TWEE (3) FEET OF COVER IN VEHICULAR TRAFRC AREAS SHALL BE POLYWNYL CHLORIDE (PVC) C900, RATED FOR 150 PSI CLASS PIPE. PROVIDE AND INSTALL "STORM DRAIN" MARKER TAPE FOR THE ENINE LENGTH OF PIPE NENCH. ALL DIRECTON CHANGES SHALL BE MADE 1411-11 WYE CONNECI1ONS, OBTUSE ELBOWS OR LONG SWEEP ELBOWS, 90* ELBOWS AND TEE'S ARE PROHIBITED. 3. ALL AREA DRAINS AND CATCH BASINS GRAIES WITHIN PEDEVRIAN ACCESSIBLE AREAS SHALL MEET ADA REQUIREMENTS. 4. ALL IRENCHES SHALL BE BACK RLLED PER THE SPECIRCAT1ONS W1TH APPROPRIATE TESTS BY THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER TO VERIFY COMPACTON VALUES. 5. FOR GRAV/TY FLOW SYSIEMS CONMACTOR SHALL VERIFY (POTHOLE IF NECESSARY) SIZE, MATERIAL, LOCA170N AND DEPTH OF ALL SYSIEMS THAT ARE TO BE CONNECIED TO OR CROSSED PRIOR TO THE 1RENCHING OR INSTALLAWN OF ANY GRAVITY FLOW SYSIEM. 6. DRAINS SHOWN ON CIVIL PLANS ARE NOT INTENDED TO BE NE ANAL NUMBER AND LOCA170N OF ALL DRAINS. PLACEMENT AND NUMBER OF LANDSCAPING DRAINS ARE HIGHLY DEPENDENT ON GROUND COVER TYPE AND PLANT MATERIAL. CONMACTOR SHALL ADD ADDITIONAL AREA DRAINS AS NEEDED AND AS DIRECTED BY IHE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT Z INSTALL SEPARATE SUB -DRAIN SYSTEM BEHIND RETAINING WALLS PER GEOTECHNICAL REPORT AND SHALL BE DISCHARGED ONTO ENERGY DISSIPATORS AS SHOWN ON PLANS. 8. ALL DOWN SPOUTS SHALL DISCHARGE DIRECTLY ON TO ADJACENT PERVIOUS SURFACES OR SPLASH BLOCKS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOIED ON PLANS. SEE ARCHITECTURE PLANS FOR EXACT LOCAIION OF THE DOWN SPOUTS. SANITARY SEWER NOTES t ALL SEWER WORK SHALL BE IN CONFORMANCE IIITH THE COUNTY ENWRONMENTAL HEALTH DEPARTMENT STANDARDS. 2. PRIVATE SANITARY SEWER MAIN AND SERICE LINE 4-INCH THROUGH 8-INCH SHALL BE POLYI4NYL CHLORIDE (PVC) SDR 26 GREEN SEWER PIPE AND SHALL CONFORM TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF ASTM DESIGNAIION D 3034-73 WITH BELL AND SPIGOT 22.5' ELBOWS OR 45: ELBOWS, 90* ELBOWS AND TEE'S ARE PROHIBITED. 3. ALL LATERALS SHALL HAVE A TWO WAY CLEANOUT AT FACE OF BUILDING AND AS SHOWN ON PLANS. 4. IF (E) SEWER LATERAL IS TO BE USED, CONIRACTOR SHALL VIDEO INSPECT PERFORM PRESSURE IEST ON (E) SEWER LATERAL, AND SHALL PERFORM ANY NEEDED REPAIRS. WATER SYSTEM NOTES t MAINTAIN WAIER MAIN LINES 10' AWAY FROM SANITARY SEWER MAIN LINES. LATERALS SHALL BE SEPARATED PER PLAN DIMENSIONS. 2. WHERE WAIER LINES HAVE TO CROSS SANITARY SEWER LINES, DO SO AT A 90 DEGREE ANGLE AND WAIER LINES SHALL BE MINIMUM OF 12” ABOVE TOP OF SANITARY SEWER LINES. 3. ALL WAIER SERICE CONNECIIONS SHALL BE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE Kg TH THE APPLICABLE WATER DISMICT STANDARDS 4. ALL WAIER LINES SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH 36" MINIMUM COVER. 5. THRUST RESTRAINTS' SHALL BE DESIGNED AND INSTALLED AT ALL TEES, CROSSES, BENDS (HORIZONTAL AND VEVICAL), AT SIZE CHANGES AND AT RRE HYDRANTS. 0 co No LLJ JANUARY 24, 2017 LLJ 0 cc LLJ LLJ Lu LO LO PROJECT NO.: ARCHITECTURE AND SITE APPLICATION NO. S-16-052 PARKS AND PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT TOWN OF LOS GATOS CC 41 le www.sandis.net 1700 S. Winchester Blvd, Suite 200, Campbell, CA 95008 I P. 408.636.0900 I F.408.636.0999 Lu 1010 MIA1*WI II I11i*IM1 \tit filW%1I1*�1 AST BAYM :liLM:1_1►A11010 >- co REVISIONS REV.: DEC. 2015 20 ccw � w 0 = c-7 w- zw Y w C o JCC ¢ W 0• 0 o= OLL LLI 0 w J - W m o W z z J 6 J w n = 02 zcc ▪ w 0 Vim., - ¢ J J =Q ll)J zo cW y_ W 5 d w El U w = V � w cc fa - cc 1- w z 0O K Y a� o� uJ O U N z W ag cc J o J O W u- 0 w LW W = w1- z- oz J O V I- zw z uJz W oL ccz = w LLw_ J ¢ o ,= O U J w >- z O vm W O w CC OM U Z w 1 z z2 C70 cc 0w N zw 0 0= cc LLIz O • w - - w u_ � O ¢O zz 0 • 0 W = E J0�� oz� " ¢ I = ¢z.� J2O ooN N L•,LU 0 ¢ Jits =�0 0 vi cc Lu CC <o� ol=o I z0� Oz¢- O U a� Q • �Q Q N CD W O N 99- 42- APN 529-37-025 394.99 PROTECT NEAREST - DOWNSTREAM INLET / .69 0 z 0) W CURB GvE R / 395.86 / `?97 / 399.27 / / / / v \GP\ / 5S GIG / Rio ' Al 411, Anr- i4UV �■•■■�� III Ar �4Ur Aar /■RP I� 4 i I�4WP 9,. 396.49 . 380.22 • 380.15 • 381.61 0 381.39 8"TREE 374.48 100( BRUSH e 381.23 379.02 / . 380.51 / 398.54 1-/G ® 382.44 381.75 - 1' e Off, 3 396.82 398.43 400.00 . 400.83 400.11 402.73 0 400.97 <5 393.8 DBL 10"ACA 382.86MWAtek 0/ 382.58 PARK.SIGN 382.43 0382.10 F� F 382.31 376.11 379.46 382.98 . 409.09 Nrak Nark Nalk ak Niak Nark Nark Nark Nark Neth74 „ C Ni \pk Nark 17 N,�14, 404.48 06.25 30"OAK . 382 383.24 JACKSON AVENUE 410.89 376.77 . 382.47 414.46 A 5PN. \\ . 412.75 O 407.94 1: 4/AK 1 395.71 395.24 382.79 jp383.51 3 - 6> 8"TREE 0 410.16 \\ 9,r 0 394.45 7 382.67 383.79 388.24 . 387.64 m 9 M cc N LL LO) z 0 (E)ADJ HSE. 420.25 421. Z•Z 405.42 402 400 398 396 394.90 394 - 392 390 388 386 378 380 377.37 Q 382.69 0 384 76 000 404.74 O383.84 o� 9). 06 9� 69 386.36 . 384.60 • 378.03 0 411.83 0 413.75 385.56 398.31 391.05 385.37 385.64 385.81 •7r 0 t` N z a EROSION CONTROL LEGEND { ti STABILIZED ENTRANCE/EXIT CONCRETE WASHOUT SPILL KIT PORTABLE RESTROOM >000000000< FlBER ROLL CONSTRUCTION FENCE INLET PROTECTION EROSION CONTROL NOTES 1. THIS PLAN IS FOR EROSION CONTROL DURING CONSTRUCTION IF NO SWPPP IS REQUIRED. IF A SWPPP FOR THE PROJECT HAS BEEN ISSUED THE PROJECT SWPPP OVERRIDES ANYTHING SHOWN ON THIS PLAN. 2. TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE/EXIT LOCATION SHOW IS APPROXIMATE. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE LOCAT10N WHERE APPROPRIATE. 3. THIS PLAN REPRESENTS POSSIBLE WATER POLLUTION CONTROL MEASURES INCLUDING EROSION CONTROL AND SEDIMENT CONTROL. 4. EXISTING SURFACES SHALL BE UNDISTURBED TO THE EXTENT PRACTICAL. 5. GROUND WATER SHALL NOT BE DISCHARGED 141TH STORM WATER. GROUND WATER DEWA TERING OPERA I1ONS SHALL BE COORDINATED AS NEEDED WITH OWNER. 6. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE EFFECTIVE SOIL COVER FOR AREAS OF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY FIAT HAVE BEEN DISTURBED AND ARE NOT SCHEDULED TO BE ACTIVE FOR AT LEAST 14 DAYS. Z ALL EROSION CONTROL AND SEDIMENT CONTROLS TO BE OBTAINED INSTALLED AND MAINTAINED AS REQUIRED AS REQUIRED BY LOCAL JURISDIC710N OR CONSTRUCTION GENERAL PERMIT. 8. CONTRACTOR TO INSTALL RUN-ON AND RUN-OFF CONTROL MEASURES ACCORDING TO PLANS OR AS NECESSARY TO ENSURE SEDIMENT IS NOT TRANSPORTED FROM SITE 9. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE BACK-UP EROSION PREVENTION MEASURES (SOIL STABILIZATION) WITH SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES SUCH AS STRAW WATTLES, SILT FENCE, GRAVEL INLET F1L TERS, AND/OR SEDIMENT TRAPS OR BASINS. ENSURE CONTROL MEASURES ARE ADEQUATE, IN PLACE, AND IN OPERABLE CONDITIONS SEDIMENT CONTROLS, INCLUDING INLET PROTECTION, ARE NECESSARY BUT SHOULD BE A SECONDARY DEFENSE BEHIND GOOD EROSION CONTROL MEASURES. 10. ALL CONCRETE TRUCKS TO USE CHUTE WASH BUCKETS FOR CONCRETE RINSE, ALL CONCRETE PUMPS TO CAPTURE CONCRETE RINSE IN SECONDARY CONTAINMENT AND PROPERLY DISPOSE. 11. STREET SWEEPING SHALL BE CHECKED DAILY TO ENSURE DEPOSITED SEDIMENT AND DEBRIS DOES NOT ENTER THE STORM DRAIN SYSTEM. USE REGENERATIVE VACUUM STREET CLEANER TO MITIGATE AIR AND WATER POLLUTION. 12. RUNOFF THAT HAS CONTACTED AMENDED SOIL AREAS SHALL NOT BE ALLOWED TO LEAVE THE SITE OR ENTER THE STORM DRAIN SYSTEM. 0 N w 0 JANUARY 24, 2017 w a 0 w J a U a 0 z C7 W 0 z cc 0 w w U w c.) 0 z w VD 0 c-I l0 c-I N PROJECT NO.: PARKS AND PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT TOWN OF LOS GATOS Z a www.sandis.net 1700 S. Winchester Blvd, Suite 200, Campbell, CA 95008 I P. 408.636.0900 I F.408.636.0999 w 1- 0 alirO N VALLEY TRI-VALLEY ENTRAL VALLE :J_\•/i MN Milli I it m REVISIONS C-5.O of 1 1 REV.: DEC. 2015 Lel O V H - - w V Z w 0 O V • — d — v�p = w �L7 6- J z a O O U J = W y z 0 J CO OLL J w Ln =Q o£ Lz w -- 2 >- 1— w iro 0 co LL �N Z w 0 12 0 L)uj w w �z co ow w 0 — LL RN JQO w o, a0� ✓� w w= � F J -J -100 0 • a Z LL a z ,� 2 O ooN -N w J = , Q J Qi NQ� 2 0 Ln0 0 V 01 c- CCLu 0 <UJW c ono trj zoV ozQ- v O PROJECT SIZE LENGTH OF CRUSHED ROCK ATB c 114 ACRE 30 0 5 1 ACRE 50 0 e 3 ACRE 100 0 a 3 ACRE 100 50 r (SEE NOTE 2) 1 4,10 Peri/ # 07/7/#77 Of .• .0r1:: A . AM GEOTEXTILE FABRIC UNDER QUARRY SPALLS 0 x x PROVIDE FULL WIDTH OF INGRESS/EGRESS AREA PLAN RIGHT OF WAY 6'" TYPICAL VARIE %tf�1►.��>�Avai�l.fS�\ir`r►.1i tL*+i�Jrj►46A`t SECTION 0 4" CRUSHED ROCK WITH GEOTEXTILE MATERIAL UNDERNEATH. 0 THE MINIMUM LENGTH SHALL BE LENGTHENED ASNECESSARYTTOO ENSURE MATERIAL IS NOT ALLLLOWED KEI)1NITH APPR BVAIL OF THE CI�ldGl ER ALTERNATE A LASE BY CASE BASIS, WHERE WILL PHYSICAL SITE CONDITIONS AND SIZE DICTATE ATB DRIVEWAY RAMP, OR SITE ACCESS ROAD 20' WIDE MIN. SEE TABLE ABOVE FOR REQUIRED LENGTH. PUBUC ROAD IL w EX. ROAD INSTALL ORANGE BARRIER FENCE TO DIRECT TRAFFIC ONTO CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE INSTALL 12' MIN. DIA. CULVERT IF A ROADSIDE DITCH 1S PRESENT. NOTES: 1 ES�UTRFACEEWAT�EgR�-- ALL pSURFACE �WATER FLOWING OR DIVERTED TOWARD CONSTRUCTION WITH StiCSLS_aHAOPES ua BE ED_ACBTED.THE ENTRANCE IF PIPING IS IMPRACTICAL, A MOUNTABLE BERM 2 MAINTENANCE - THE ENTRANCE SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN A CONDITION WHICH WILL PREVENT TOP DRESS NFLOWING ANDNREPAIR SEDIMENT CLEANOUT OF ARIGHT-OF-WAY. Y M SURES USED TO MAY SEDIMEENT. ALL SEDIMENT SPILLED. DROPPED. WASHED OR TRACKED ONTO PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY MUST BE REMOVED IMMEDIATELY. 3 WHEELS SHALL BE CLEANED TO REMOVE SEDIMENT PRIOR TO ENTRANCE ONTO PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY. WHEN WASHING IS USED. IT SHALL BE DONE ON AN AREA STABILIZED WITH STONE AND WHICH DRAINS INTO AN APPROVED SEDIMENT TRAPPING DEVICE.. 4 PERIODIC INSPECTION AND NEEDED MAINTENANCE SHALL BE PROVIDED AFTER EACH RAIN. NOT TO SCALE APPROVED BY TOWN ENGINEER DATE NOVEMBER 2010 STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE STD PLAN NO. ST-250 T:\GIS\PPW\TLG GENERAL\Stondord Details\ST-250.dwg 12 MIL PLASTIC LINING WEIGHT IN CORNERS STRAW BALES REUSABLE ROUGH WOODEN FRAME 2 WOODEN STAKES OR REBAR PER BALE (TYP) 12 MIL PLASTIC STAPLE AS REQUIRED LINING BALES (BEYOND) ROUGH WOODEN FRAME ASPHALT CONCRETE APPROVED BY TOWN ENGINEER DATE NOVEMBER 2010 NATIVE MATERIAL SECTION A -A T:\GIS\PPW\TLG GENERAL\Standard Details \ST-255.dwg BINDING WIRE STRAW BALES (2) WEIGHT IN CORNERS TEMPORARY CONCRETE WASHOUT FACILITY FINISHED GRADE 10" DIAMETER FILTERED LUZ !--w ¢g u.w 0= te k LLI UJ J LU 0 uJ 0 LL1 H uJ d a_ 0 Z 0 z w x 1— Q 0 z w fY D U w 0 G7 I- z w la 0 (0l-�,y� W Qw wCC 0 V 2. ADJACENT ROLLS SHALL TIGHTLY ABUT. 3. RUNOFF MUST NOT BE ALLOWED TO RUN UNDER OR AROUND STRAW ROLL. 25' SPACING. 4. STRAW ROLLS SHALL BE PLACED ON SLOPES @ NOT TO SCALE APPROVED 13Y DATE NOVEMBER. 2010 TOWN ENGINEER. ( STRAW ROLL STD. PLAN NO. ST-253 TADS \PP*\TLC GENERAL\Stondord De1oita\ST-253.dwg INTERIM EROSION CONTROL MEASURES (USE AS APPLICABLE TO YOUR PROJECT.) NOTES: 1. IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE OWNER/CONTRACTOR TO INSURE THAT NO MUD OR SILTATION LEAVES THE PROJECT SITE. 2. INTERIM EROSION CONTROL MEASURES MUST BE COMPLETED AND IN PLACE BY OCTOBER 1. 3. ALL INTERIM EROSION CONTROL MEASURES MUST BE CONTINUOUSLY MAINTAINED THROUGHOUT THE OCTOBER 1 TO APRIL 15 RAINY SEASON. 4. CALL THE INSPECTION LINE AT (408) 399-5760 BY SEPTEMBER 15 FOR INSPECTION OF EROSION CONTROL DEVICES. CALL 24 HOURS IN ADVANCE. INCLUDE GRADING PERMIT NUMBER. 5. IF EROSION CONTROL MEASURES ARE NOT IN PLACE AS REQUIRED OR NOT MAINTAINED, ALL WORK SHALL CEASE UNTIL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES ARE REMEDIED. MEASURES: 1. INSTALL SILT FENCE. PROVIDE DETAIL, SHOW LOCATION ON PLANS AND ADD NOTES AS NEEDED. 2. SEED EXPOSED AREAS PER TOWN SPECIFICATIONS. SEE BELOW. 3. INSTALL DRAINAGE MEASURES INCLUDING CATCH BASINS, ENERGY DISSIPATORS, ETC, PROVIDE DETAIL, SHOW LOCATIONS ON PLANS, AND ADD NOTES AS NEEDED. 4. INSTALL CHECK DAMS. SEDIMENT TRAPS AND BASINS, TEMPORARY SWALES. 5. INSTALL JUTE NETTING OVER SEEDED AND MULCHED SLOPES. 6. COVER BARE SLOPES WITH STRAW BLANKETS. SEEDING SPECIFICATIONS: 1. SEED AND MULCH WILL BE APPLIED BY OCT 1 TO ALL DISTURBED SLOPES AND TO ALL CUTS AND FILL SLOPES WITHIN OR ADJACENT TO PUBLIC RIGHTS -OF -WAY AS DIRECTED BY TOWN ENGINEER. 2. SEED AND FERTILIZER WILL BE APPLIED HYDRAULICALLY OR BY HAND AT THE RATES SPECIFIED BELOW. ON SLOPES, STRAW WILL BE APPLIED BY BLOWER OR BY HAND AND ANCHORED IN PLACE 3Y PUNCHING OR WITH JUTE NETTING. ITEM POUNDS/ACRE "Bianclo" brome 30 Annual rye grass 20 Fertilizer (16-20-0 & 15% sulfur) 500 Straw 4,000 3. SEEDED AREAS WILL BE REPAIRED, RESEEDED AND MULCHED, IF DAMAGED. APPROVED BY TOWN ENGINEER T:\CIS\P DATE NOVEMBER 2010 TLC GENERAL\Stcndcrd Details\ST-255.dwg !NTER.IM EROSION CONTROL NOTES STD. PLAN NO. ST-255 FG APC, RCP, OR CSP LENGTH 2" 6 x DIA SLOPE ROUNDING DISSIPATOR STONES SHALL BE MIN. 12" DIAMETER PROFILE APC, RCP, OR CSP FES PIN FABRIC Tr3!".. SIDES OF TRENCH WIDTH FABRIC SECTION A -A FLOWLUNE PLAN TRIM FABRIC IF NEEDED. NO FABRIC SHALL PROTRUDE ABOVE GROUND. NOT TO SCALE APPROVED BY TOWN ENGINEER DATE NOVEMBER 2010 T:\GIS\PPW\TLG GENERAL\Standard Details\ST-254.dwg ENERGY DISSAPATOR Storm Drain Inlet Protection STD, PLAN NO. ST-254 SE-10 x Sheet flow ,_ Less than 1 acre x Geotextile Blanket -Drain inlet SECTION A -A -Droin inlet PLAN Silt Fence per SE-01 6" Min overlap at ends of silt fence. � x Geotextile Blanket x --Silt Fence per SE-01 x x DI PROTECTION TYPE 1 NOT TO SCALE NOTES: 1. For use in areas where grading hos been completed and final soil stabilization and seeding are pending. 2. Not applicable in paved areas. 3. Not applicable with concentrated flows. November 2009 California Stormwater BMP Handbook Construction www.casqa.org ViVockeISUNiVYYALE'IEresta► QonbalVNU( 5 7 of 10 r` 0 N w 0 JANUARY 24, 2017 w 0 w J 0 0 z w J Q 0 0 z N w 0 z 0 w w 0 W _ 0 0 z z w PROJECT NO.: J PARKS AND PUBLI WORKS DEPARTMENT TOWN OF LOS GATOS w 1- 0 www.sandis.net 00 CO 00 0 0) 00 U 0 0 >- m REVISIONS 4 C-5.1 OF 11 REV.: DEC. 2015 vim w = w Z MZ - w w CC_ O~ �o QW cc O 0 O 1- o 2L.) J— z W m 0W z 0 zo QN J W 02 zcc O LL z VCC - Q a < 1-- J J aQ l/)cc Z O W z = d Er U W w = V � w Q o CC 1- W z 0 0 c 00 Q LL Ln 0 o bi u C Z CC LLg J ao LL cc 0 a w W = Q1- a O LL) - ,y V Z w 0 ccz 1—2 LL W O J zQ 0 cc 5 =w O u- 0 w C Lz W _} Z z� 0 0 cc Q LL t/')N w O J f▪ l OQ oac W W �Z co 0 w W •� r�o r Z < mwa o o N W W = cc �o�a =o 0 tl Q = z LL ZS� o oN °N J,z J � Q J_ VI0 O <v 3 CC UJ CC <�W ono CC=I zOV 0 N ID 0 (76 Cri r_ s. �i. Pollution Prevention It's Part of the Plan • I.7..i .- • i • I ✓�f f t� f • 4 f I 1 - . f F F• L .r } Make sure your crews and subs do the job right! Runoff from streets and other paved areas is a major source of pollution in San Francisco Bay. Construction activities can directly affect the health of the Bay unless contractors and crews plan ahead to keep dirt, debris, and other construction waste away from storm drains and local creeks. Following these guidelines will ensureyour compliance with local ordinance requirements. Vehicle and equipment Dewatering maintenance & cleaning operations ---,- �-� Materials storage& spill cleanup Non -hazardous materials management Sand, dirt, and similar materials must be stored at least 10 feet from catch basins, and covered with a tarp during wet weather or when rain is forecast. ,/ Use (but don't overuse) reclaimed water for dust control as needed. ,/ Sweep streets and other paved areas daily. Do not wash down streets or work areas with water! ✓ Recycle all asphalt, concrete, and aggregate base material from demolition activities. ,/ Check dumpsters regularly for leaks and to make sure they don't overflow. Repair or replace leaking dumpsters promptly. Hazardous materials management ,/ Label all hazardous materials and hazardous wastes (such as pesticides, paints, thinners, solvents, fuel, oil, and antifreeze) in accordance with city, state, and federal regulations. ,/ Store hazardous materials and wastes in secondary containment and cover them during wet weather. / Follow manufacturer's application instructions for hazardous materials and be careful not to use more than necessary.. Do not apply chemicals outdoors when rain is forecast within 24 hours. ,/ Be sure to arrange for appropriate disposal of all hazardous wastes. Spill prevention and control ✓ Keep a stockpile of spill cleanup materials (rags, absorbents, etc.) available at the construction site at all times. ,/ When spills or leaks occur, contain them immediately and be particularly care- ful to prevent leaks and spills from reaching the gutter, street, or storm drain. Never wash spilled material into a gutter, street, storm drain, or creek! Report any hazardous materials spills immediately! Dial 911 or your local emer- gency response number. ,/ Inspect vehicles and equipment for leaks frequently. Use drip pans to catch leaks until repairs are made; repair leaks promptly. ,/ Fuel and maintain vehicles on site only in a bermed area or over a drip pan that is big enough to prevent runoff. ,/ If you must clean vehicles or equipment on site, clean with water only in a bermed area that will not allow rinsewater to run into gutters, streets, storm drains, or creeks. ,/ Do not clean vehicles or equipment on -site using soaps, solvents, degreasers, steam cleaning equipment, etc. Earthwork & contaminated soils ,/ Keep excavated soil on the site where it is least likely to collect in the street. Transfer to dump trucks should take place on the site, not in the street. Use hay bales, silt fences, or other control measures to minimize the flow of silt off the site. ,/ Avoid scheduling earth moving activities during the rainy season if possible. If grading activities during wet weather are allowed in your permit, be sure to .- --- implement all control measures necessary t.o prevent erosion. / Mature vegetation is the best form of erosion control. Minimize disturbance to -y - existing vegetation whenever possible. ,/ If you disturb a slope during construction, prevent erosion by securing the soil with erosion control fabric, or seed with fast- growing grasses as soon as possible. Place hay bales down -slope until soil is secure. lee If you suspect contamination (from site history, discoloration, odor, texture, abandoned underground tanks or pipes, or buried debris), call your local fire department for help in determining what testing should be done. / Manage disposal of contaminated soil according to Fire Department instructions. I Reuse water for dust control, irrigation, or another on -site purpose to the greatest extent possible. / Be sure to call your city's storm drain inspector before discharging water to a street, gutter, or storm drain. Filtration or diversion through sediment trap may be required. • In areas of known contamination, testing is required prior to of groundwater. Consult with the city inspector to determine and to interpret results. Contaminated groundwater must be off -site for proper disposal. Saw cutting a basin, tank, or reuse or discharge what testing to do treated or hauled / Always completely cover or barricade storm drain inlets when saw cutting. Use filter fabric, hay bales, sand bags, or fine gravel dams to keep slurry out of the storm drain system. / Shovel, absorb, or vacuum saw -cut slurry and pick up all waste as soon as you are finished in one location or at the end of each work day (whichever is sooner!). • If saw cut slurry enters a catch basin, clean it up immediately. Paving/asphalt work / Do not pave during wet weather or when rain is forecast. ,/ Always cover storm drain inlets and man- holes when paving or applying seal coat, tack coat, slurry seal, or fog seal. ,/ Place drip pans or absorbent material un- der paving equipment when not in use. ,/ Protect gutters, ditches, and drainage courses with hay bales, sand bags, or earthen berms. ,/ Do not sweep or wash down excess sand from sand sealing into gutters, storm drains, or creeks. Collect sand and return it to the stockpile, or dispose of it as trash. / Do not use water to wash down fresh asphalt concrete pavement. Concrete, grout, and mortar storage & waste disposal ,/ Be sure to store concrete, grout, and mortar under cover and away from drainage areas. These materials must never reach a storm drain. ,/ Wash out concrete equipment/trucks off -site or designate an on -site area for washing where water will flow onto dirt or into a temporary pit in a dirt area. Let the water seep into the soil and dispose of hardened concrete with trash. I Divert water from washing exposed aggregate concrete to a dirt area where it will not run into a gutter, street, or storm drain. I If a suitable dirt area is not available, collect the wash water and remove it for appropriate disposal off site. Painting / Never rinse paint brushes or materials in a gutter or street! /+' Paint out excess water -based paint before rinsing brushes, rollers, or containers in a sink. If you can't use a sink, direct wash water to a dirt area and spade it in. ✓ Paint out excess oil -based paint before cleaning brushes in thinner. 1 Filter paint thinners and solvents for reuse whenever possible. Dispose of oil -based paint sludge and unusable thinner as hazardous waste. BASMAA Bay Arca Stormwater Management s' „m, Hanagnaen, Agencies Association (BASMAA) 1-888-BAYW ISE Storm drain polluters may be liable for fines of up to $10,000 per day! JANUARY 24, 2017 w Q 0 0 N w 0 Q cc 0 w w U w U 0 Z z w 0 c-I c-I N PROJECT NO.: PARKS AND PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT TOWN OF LOS GATOS www.sandis.net 0 a CO 01 >- co REVISIONS C-5.2 OF 11 REV.: DEC. 2015 0 N &„cC cc W � w 0 CC Y w o~ aw zz o p oLIJ W W = W V Jam, w V CD O zz 0 W o L/1 J W Vi = o� o U_ �W zc� o z J < aQ Q aQ /) J z0 cWLLJ LL CCz cf w V w <0 _CL CC 1- Lz 0 0 CL d p 0 z� 0 0 w L) CC CC J � Q o CC o w cL - W W_ Q ~ z� 0 z p V F-) — z cLJ I z V z w �V z �o = w �w LL J OQ op U J �w v) y- ^ O Li m oQ w CC Q 0 0 Vz w S > 1z zz CCo �"- oW zw O J 0 < zQ o V w w Ow.� - W CC o, >_0 0 ~a Cr) mw0 Nz z� do co I-00 W J J p 0 o I Q� o>� z'� O a zzLLJ c J G w \ NzT Q o Qi Q J 0 N¢� W Q� � 1— < Lf) Uo a"Q � w I oI—o V ~ = I � � z 0 U 0 0 c) ENG\26 Alpine Avenue 0 CLEAN -OUT BOX //•i/Vr 7 3 1/21 PLASTIC PLUG\ // VARIES TC PIPE PIPE SIZE INDICATED ON PLAN (4' MIN.) LONG RADIUS 1/8 BEND FUTURE SEWER LATERAL FROM SITE ) VVVVN 45" WYE MIN. COVER 3.0' `VC PLUG ( TO MAIN MIN. S=22' PIPE SIZE INDICATED ON PLAN (4'" MIN.) NOTE 1. IF CLEANOUT IS INSTALLED IN DRIVEWAY, USE TRAFFIC TYPE BOX (CHRISTY G5 OR EQUAL). 2. SEE DETAIL SS-604 ON C-6.1 FOR SEWER CLEANOUT. STORM CLEAN -OUT N.T.S. VARIES VARIES 61 PERVIOUS CONCRETE YM\% \ /\ /\ /\ /\ /\ /\ /\ /\ /\ \ /\\ /\ 12a SCARIFY AND COMPACT TO 95Z REL. COMPACTION CONTRACTOR SHALL PREPARE SOILS AS NECESSARY TO PROVIDE A STABLE SUBGRADE 4 PERFORATED PIPE 6" PERVIOUS CONCRETE— VAR/ES 3" MIN 1 FLTER FABRIC MIRAFI 140N OR APPROVED EQUIVALENT PERVIOUS PAVEMENT CO N.T.S. FINISH GRADE MATERIAL VARIES /\\\�/ SEE PLAN // BACKFKL PER TRENCH DETAIL ADS MODEL 2712 AG 121 SQUARE PVC BODY WITH CAST IRON GRATE 2% \/\//� // GASKET JOINT 6" MIN. SIZE RISER. FIELD CUT RISER FOR ADJUSTMENT GRATE & RISER DETAIL PVC TEE w/ GASKET JOINTS PIPE SIZE PER PLAN BACK FILL PER TRENCH DETAIL ti 0 0 �o boo °o°08 0 REDUCER TO DIA. OF RISER AS NECESSARY °o°0Cg 0o°o0° ° 0 0 TEE & RISER DETAIL AREA DRAIN %� \`J N. T.S. w Z_ I opo r0 O I m • rn ▪ w Owl <U• 0 _ • X C.)CC W JANUARY 24, 2017 w 1- 0 0 z L w 0 z 0 w w 0 w 0 0 z w LID O rl PROJECT NO.: PARKS AND PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT TOWN OF LOS GATOS www.sandis.net 1700 S. Winchester Blvd, Suite 200, Campbell, CA 95008 I P. 408.636.0900 I F.408.636.0999 Lw 0 41111010 1010 %1A1*WI II I11i*IM1 \tit filW%1I1��1 AST BAYM Co REVISIONS i C-6.0 of 11 REV.: DEC. 2015 c0 Q LL ^ 0 O V "„ C W2LL J cc a° LL cc Oii w W = a= oz O R- - w V z W O u ccz v.)o w 1-w LL O J zQ 0 cC - = w O J V m O c O M L w _ > 1 O 0 Q LL t/)N z 0 1=� o= w w �z coz Ow.� cCw u_ Eli J_ Q Lfl�z aO ✓� w LFco boo JOa LL= 0zI a� > A <c N J Owr"j • N roc Ln LL aouj su J Q J O N=Q w = _ 0 3 Q om < cri • F� C▪ C 0~ <w w cd zoV L)¢- 0 SEE DETAIL BELOW s,`` `\`\ -y s \�Y .-- -.1.--- CONCRETE SIDEWALK (STD PLAN 216) CURB & GUTTER (STD PLAN 210) CURB TRANSITION DETAIL 0 EQUALS WIDTH OF DRIVEWAY AT PROPERTY LINE. MINIMUM WIDTH = 14'. 0 1/2" WIDE FULL DEPTH EXPANSION JOINT. 0 FULL DEPTH EXPANSION JOINT IF IS 15' OR GREATER. O DRIVEWAY TO BE SURFACED WITH ASPHALT OR CONCRETE. ( DRIVEWAY CONCRETE SHALL BE A MIN. OF 6" THICK FOR RESIDENTIAL AND 8" THICK FOR COMMERCIAL AND IS TO BE PLACED ON A MINIMUM OF 6" CLASS II AGGREGATE BASE 95% MAXIMUM COMPACTION ASTM D1557, OVER COMPACTED SUBGRADE. Q ALL CONCRETE SHALL BE CLASS A, PER CALTRANS SPECS, WITH 1 LB. (MIN.) LAMP BLACK PER CUBIC YARD. 0 ALL WORK SHALL COMFORM TO CURRENT ADA REQUIREMENTS. :APPROVED BY DATE JUNE 2004 TOWN ENGINEER NOT TO SCALE CONCRETE DRIVEWAY WITHOUT PLANTER STD. PLAN NO_ 219 ST-2I9.DWG - { '-Z>. 9UILCING SEWER REDWOOD GRAPE STAKE FOR FUTURE CONNECTIONS NOTES: INSTALL WYE CI'D.AT OR WITHIN FIVE FEET OF PROPERTY LINE I 77. "riN 5L 7p ---_ !~ ,wPER Foci - TIGHT PLUG, EASILY REMOVABLE BAND SEAL AND STOPPER OR STANDARD END CAP FOR FUTURE CONNECTIONS, OTHERWISE CONNECT TO EXISTING SEWER. FINISHEC GRADE 4" PVC SI R35 45' ELL (,) TRACE WIRE RISER TO REST AGAINST UNDISTURBED SOIL. WHERE TRENCH IS TOO WIDE, PVC C•900. CL200 PIPE SHALL BE USED AND SHALL BE INSTALLED VERTICALLY IN CONCRETE CRADLE. 1 FOR SEWER DEPTHS FROM MINIMLtMVI COVER TO 5 FEET, USE STANDARD WYE CONNECTION. FOR DEPTHS BELOW 5 FEET, USE STANDARD TEE CONNECTION WITH SLOPING RISER AS SHOWN. TAP-TITE CONNECTIONS MAY BE USED WHERE APPLICABLE. 2. WHEN SEWER IS AT MINIMUM DEPTH, HOLD SERVICE DINE TO MINIMUM SLOPE AND LESSEN COVER AT PROPERTY LINE, OTHERWISE 3 FEET OF COVER TO OFFICIAL GRADE 1S REQUIRED AT PROPERTY LINE. 3. THE LOCATION CIF ALL SEWER LATERALS SHALL BE MARKED WITH A .LETTER "S" ON TOP OF CURB DR BACK CIF WALK. 4. ALL SERVICE TEES OR WYES SMALL BE MANUFACTURER'S STANDARD FITTINGS. CONNECTION CLOSURE SHALL BE BY STANDARD BA.I•ID SEAL COUPLINGS ON SERVICE ADOJTrONS. NO PIPE BREAKING AND CONCRETE PATCHING WILL BE PERMITTED, ONLY NEATLY SNAPPED OR SAWCUT LENGTHS WILL BE ALLOWED. 5. 5 GAUGE COPPER'WIRE FOR TRACING PURPOSES SHALL BE PLACED ON ALL NEW LATERALS AND REPLACEMENT LATERALS WHEN EXCAVATION IS FROM MAIN LINE TO THE PROPERTY LINE CLEANOUT. WIRE TO BE BROUGHT TO RISER WITH TWO FEET COILED INSIDE BOX. B. TAP -TITS AND TEE CONNECTIONS ARE NOT ALLOWELI IN TERIA]NATING SEWER MAINS (MOST UPSTREAM LINE). POUR CONCRETE SUPPORT -Ica' WIDE MIN. ANGLE 10* STANDARD TEE OR WYE BRANCH TAP-TITE DEEP SEWER - GREATER THAN 10' BAND SEAL COUPLING STANDARD WYE CONNECTION AT MAIN SEE NOTES 1 AND rJ STANDARD TEE CONNECTION AT MAIN SEE NOTES 1 AND 4 APPROVED BY TOWN ENGINEER DATE NOVEMBER 2010 TAGIS1,PPW\TLC CE,NERAL\Stvndord etoias 6Q6.dwg SANITARY SEWER LATERAL CONNECTIONS STD. PLAN NO. SS-606 1"R, 112"DEEP TAPERED TO TOP OF LID. 1/2" SET SCREW 3 REQ'D @ 120" rl 9-112" 8"'-45' ELBOW TRENCH BOTTOM BEDDING AS REQUIRED 12" fyy 3/4" 1/2" SET 8" I.D. SCREW 1/4" R 3'x3'x4" CLASS "A' CONCRETE PAD OUTSIDE PAVED AREA 2' FINISHED GRADE =WMOI 4"CLASS II AGGREGATE BASE r ,'„-- ., ,,,0-4; r _. _ -*/ _ • _ ,\ - —iee—V<, __—",v/vvi —Ay NOTES: 2* AC (TYPE A) 1' 6" GRAVEL BORROW 12' CONCRETE CLASS B 1. ALL SEWER PIPE SHALL BE ASTM 3034 SOR 35. 2. THE COVER. SHALL BE LOCKING TYPE. NOT TO SCALE APPROVED BY TOWN LK]NEER DATE NOVEMBER 2010 T:\GIS\PPW\LG GENERAL\Standard DetoTIj\SS-6Q4.dwg SEWER CLEANOUT STD, PLAN NO. SS-604 6" ASPHALT CONCRETE / SAWCUT EXISTING PAVEMENT STRUCTURAL BACKFILL TO BE COMPACTED TO 95% RELATIVE COMPACTION OR CONTROLLED D EiVSITY FILL �. /, APPLY ASPHALT BINDER TO EDGE OF EXISTING PAVEMENT (TYP.) 2" - 1/2" MED GRADE MIN TYPE A AC +4"-3/4"MED GRADE TYPE AORBAC BEDDIi1G MATERIAL TO BE COMPACTED TO 90% RELATIVE COMPACTION. PIPE O.D. 8" NATIVE BACKFILLING, IF ACCEPTABLE. OTHERWISE, CL 2 AB, AS DIRECTED BY TOWN ENGINEER. z E7 Q tu CI 1- CD g TRACER WIRE SOLID #8 COPPER WIRE WITH PROTECTIVE COATING VAR. M1N. 8" APPROVED BY DATE STD. PLAN NO. 0 N 0 JANUARY 24, 2017 w a 0 w J Q 0 0 z w J 0 N 0 N w 0 J 0 w w 0 w 0 0 z z w 0 c-I N PROJECT NO.: ri O Q 1 W D o w Z oz w W D z o L., I- >Q z� pE w z U H = D Z _1O Q cC z < w a �J NI z Ou U a PARKS AND PUBLI� WORKS DEPARTMENT TOWN OF LOS GATOS www.sandis.net 1700 S. Winchester Blvd, Suite 200, Campbell, CA 95008 I P. 408.636.0900 I F.408.636.0999 Lu antriri]► 11Wfr:iS7/,lIXI i1 ►li:LlW/ill '1 AST BAY67 :ELM:1_l►�i11►Ill . >- co REVISIONS NOVEMBER 2010 TOWN ENGINEER T:\GIS\PPW\TLG GENERAL\Standnrd to s.\SID-3U5-dwg t• TRENCI I DETAIL SD-305 C-6.1 OF 11 REV.: DEC. 2015 z m Corey PC2 6-26-17.pin INDICATES EXISTING SIDE WALK TO REMAIN, TYP. INDICATES EXISTING CURB CUT TO REMAIN, TYP. INDICATES EXISTING TREE TO REMAIN, TYP. INDICATES EXISTING 8" HDPE SEWER LINE AT ALPINE AVENUE INDICATES TREE PROTECTION FENCING PER TOWN OF LOS GATOS GENERAL TREE PROTECTION DIRECTIONS, TYP. INDICATES EXISTING CURB CUT TO REMAIN, TYP. INDICATES EXISTING EDGE OF PAVEMENT INDICATES PROPOSED RESIDENCE, TYP. INDICATES EXISTING MIN. 12' WIDE DRIVEWAY RESURFACED WITH PERMEABLE PAVER SYSTEM INDICATES 30'-0" REQUIRED FRONT SETBACK INDICATES PROPOSED 21'-4" WIDE x 20'-8" DEEP INSIDE DIM. - TWO CAR GARAGE (TYP.) U.N.O. INDICATES EXISTING FENCE TO BE REMOVED (TYP.) U.N.O. CONNECT NEW 4" PVC SDR 26 SANITARY SEWER LINE W/TOWN'S SEWER LINE AT ALPINE AVENUE, MIN. 10' AWAY FROM WATER LINE (N) ADDRESS SIGNAGE/ IDENTIFICATION AT EXISTING STONE COLUMN TO REMAIN (TYP.) U.N.O. INDICATES EXISTING CURB CUT TO REMAIN INDICATES EXISTING STONE COLUMN TO BE REMOVED (TYP.) U.N.O. INDICATES PROPOSED DRIVEWAY W/ PERMEABLE PAVERS SEE DETAIL 9/C-2 INDICATES NEW CURB CUT INDICATES JOINT TRENCH FOR NEW UNDERGROUND SERVICE FOR (N) GAS, (N) ELECTRIC, PHONE AND CABLE SERVICE INDICATES (N) GAS METER LOCATION INDICATES (N) ELEC. METER LOCATION REMOVE EXISTING CURB CUT INDICATES EXISTING WATER METER LOCATION TO REMAIN (TYP.) U.N.O. INDICATES EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT LOCATION TO REMAIN (TYP.) U.N.O. INDICATES EXISTING STONE COLUMN TO REMAIN (TYP.) U.N.O. INDICATES NEW GAS LINE - CONN W/TOWN'S GAS LINE AT ALPIN ENUE / INDICATES EXISTING BUILDING OUTLINE ON ADJACENT LOT, TYP NOTE: TREE SIZES ON SHEET T-1: SS co co TOPOGRAPHIC AND BOUNDARY SURVEY HAVE BEEN MEASURED AT THE BASE OF THE TREES. TREE SIZES ON SHEET A-1.0 & L-1.0: ARE CONSISTENT WITH THE ARBORIST REPORT : DIAMETER AT BREAST HEIGHT IN INCHES IS THE DIAMETER OF THE TRUNK MEASURED AT 4.5 FEET ABOVE THE GROUND LEVEL IN INCHES, AS REQUIRED. N INDICATES (N) FENCE @ ( E) FENCE LOC_TION - TYP. U.N.O. INDICATES (N) AC PAD /LOCATION F.S.= 389'-8" — / W/ IRON GRATE ABOVE / 00 d- 9 26"OAK PATIO / LIGHTWELL 58 6"ELDER_,' 11 6"PRUNUS___ _ PROPOSED STONE CLAD RETAINING WALL INDICATES RETAINING WALL, TYP. INDICATES EXISTING TREE TO BE REMOVED, TYP. 418 A'\,6 N43°30'00" E 26.00 WATER £GbTURE 35 7" BUCKEYE 39 15"BAY aft / 41 14"BAY / t 38 7"BAY y �� �� 50 24" BUCKEYE 7 / / / 6"PRUNUS 19 / / OF— 21 12"OAK Off— 23 7"OAK 22 24 6"OAK 26 12" BAY 30 27 25 24"OAK 7 / / / / / 15 is��P� 18 DBL 14"OAK / 20 11"BAY zn)' 29 12"BAY / // 28 10"BUCKEYE / <60 .CpQ 18"OAK'TB 0 12"OAK j 51 18 AK / / / 7 7 / / 5� / • i / 0) /22BAY 440°,1 +1 / /52 13"OAK 3g0 16 4"BAY 17 14"OAK 3g4 12"BUCKEYE 56 ♦ 13 ",6AK 55 3g0 54 FIRE DEPARTMENT NOTES FIRE PROTECTION WATER AN AUTOMATIC NFPA 13 FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM APPROVED BY THE SANTA CLARA COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT SHALL BE INCLUDED IN ALL PORTIONS OF THE BUILDING. THREE SETS OF PLANS PREPARED BY A SPRINKLER CONTRACTOR SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE SANTA CLARA COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT (14700 WINCHESTER BLVD., LOS GATOS, CA 95032) FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL. THE SPRINKLERS SHALL BE INSPECTED AND APPROVED BY THE FIRE DEPARTMENT PRIOR TO FINAL INSPECTION AND OCCUPANCY OF THE BUILDING. A. AN APPROVED AUTOMATIC FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM, HYDRAULICALLY DESIGNED IN ACCORDANCE WITH NFPA STANDARD 13 -2013 EDITION AND LOCAL ORDINANCES SHALL BE INSTALLED THROUGHOUT THE ENTIRE STRUCTURE. THE FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM SUPPLY VALVING, FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION (FDC), ETC., SHALL BE INSTALLED AS REQUIRED TO COMPLY WITH NFPA 13 REQUIREMENTS. B. FAST RESPONSE FIRE SPRINKLER HEADS SHALL BE INSTALLED THROUGHOUT THE GARAGE AND ALL CONTIGUOUS AREAS WITHIN THE STRUCTURE. C. A STATE OF CALIFORNIA LICENSED FIRE PROTECTION CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE (3) COPIES OF THE WORKING DRAWINGS, CALCULATIONS, A COMPLETED PERMIT APPLICATION AND APPROPRIATE FEES TO THE FIRE DEPARTMENT FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL PRIOR TO BEGINNING OF WORK. D. THE FIRE DISTRICT MUST ISSUE A PERMIT PRIOR TO THE INSTALLATION OF THE FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM. E. THE SPRINKLER CONTRACTOR MUST HAVE A CITY BUSINESS LICENSE AND WORKER'S COMPENSATION CERTIFICATE. F. A FLAT CEILING IS REQUIRED IN AREAS INCORPORATING AN AUTOMATIC FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM TO ASURE PROPER FUNCTIONING OF THE SPRINKLER HEADS. G. THE BUILDING SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH AN AUTOMATIC FIRE EXTINGUISHING SYSTEM. SPRINKLER CONTROL VALVES SHALL BE LOCATED TO ALLOW CONTROL OF THE SPRINKLER RISER FROM OUTSIDE THE BUILDING. SUBMIT SHOP DRAWINGS (3 SETS) AND A PERMIT APPLICATION TO THE FIRE PREVENTION DIVISION FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL BEFORE INSTALLING THE SYSTEM. CALL (408) 378-4010 FOR MORE INFORMATION. SMOKE ALARMS PER CBC #907.2.9.2, SMOKE ALARMS SHALL BE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH CBC #907.2.11. EGRESS DOORS EGRESS DOORS SHALL BE READILY OPENABLE FROM THE EGRESS SIDE WITHOUT THE USE OF A KEY, THUMB TURN, OR ANY SPECIAL KNOWLEDGE OR EFFORT. MANUALLY OPERATED FLUSH BOLTS OR SURFACE BOLTS ARE NOT PERMITTED, UNLESS ANY OF THE EXCEPTIONS TO THE SECTION 1008.1.9.4 ARE MET. (CBC #1008.1.9) PREMISES IDENTIFICATION / PROJECT ADDRESS APPROVED NUMBERS OR ADDRESSES SHALL BE PLACED ON ALL NEW AND EXISTING BUILDINGS IN SUCH A POSITION AS TO BE PLAINLY LEGIBLE AND VISIBLE FROM THE STREET OR ROAD FRONTING THE PROPERTY. SAID NUMBERS SHALL CONTRAST WITH THEIR BACKGROUND. WHERE REQUIRED BY THE FIRE CODE OFFICIAL, ADDRESS NUMBERS SHALL BE ARABIC NUMBERS OR ALPHABETICAL LETTERS. NUMBERS SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 4 INCHES HIGH WITH A MINIMUM STROKE OF 0.5 INCH. (CFC/505.1) WILDLAND / URBAN INTERFACE FIRE AREA THIS PROJECT IS LOCATED WITHIN THE DESIGNATED WILDLAND URBAN INTERFACE AREA. THE BUILDING CONSTRUCTION SHALL COMPLY WITH THE PROVISIONS OF THE CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE (CBC) CHAPTER 7A. & R327 THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL APPLY A. CLASS 'A' ROOF ASSEMBLY IS REQUIRED. SEE PROVIDED DETAILS ON AD SHEETS. B. MIN. 1/2" SPARK ARRESTOR SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR EACH CHIMNEY. C. COMBUSTIBLE VEGETATION SHALL BE REMOVED WITHIN 30FT TO 100FT. OF STRUCTURE AND BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH CBC SEC 701A.3.2.4 PRIOR TO PROJECT FINAL APPROVAL. WATER SUPPLY REQUIREMENTS POTABLE WARER SUPPLIES SHALL BE PROTECTED FROM CONTAMINATION CAUSED BY FIRE PROTECTION WATER SUPPLIES. IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE APPLICANT AND ANY CONTRACTORS AND SUBCONTRACTORS TO CONTACT THE WATER PURVEYOR SUPPLYING THE SITE OF SUCH PROJECT, AND TO COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THAT PURVEYOR. SUCH REQUIREMENTS SHALL BE INCORPORATED INTO THE DESIGN OF ANY WATER -BASED FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEMS, AND/OR FIRE SUPPRESSION WATER SUPPLY SYSTEMS OR STORAGE CONTAINERS THAT MAY BE PHYSICALLY CONNECTED IN ANY MANNER TO AN APPLIANCE CAPABLE OF CAUSING CONTAMINATION OF THE POTABLE WATER SUPPLY OF THE PURVEYOR OF RECORD. FINAL APPROVAL OF THE SYSTEM(S) UNDER CONSIDERATION WILL NOT BE GRANTED BY THE FIRE DEPARTMENT UNTIL COMPLIANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE WATER PURVEYOR OF RECORD ARE DOCUMENTED BY THAT PURVEYOR AS HAVING BEEN MET BY THE APPLICANT(S). CONSTRUCTION SITE FIRE SAFETY ALL CONSTRCUTION SITES MUST COMPLY WITH APPLICABLE PROVISIONS OF THE CFC CHAPTER 33 AND THE FIRE DEPARTMENTS STANDARD DETAIL AND SPECIFICATION SI-7. PROVIDE APPROPRIATE NOTATIONS ON SUBSEQUENT PLAN SUBMITTALS, AS APPROPRIATE TO THE PROJECT. CFC CHP.33 SITE PLAN LEGEND PROPERTY LINE SETBACK LINE (E) GRADE MINOR CONTOUR LINE (E) GRADE MAJOR CONTOUR LINE PROPOSED GRADE CONTOUR LINE —I EXISTING FENCE TO REMAIN EXISTING FENCE TO BE REMOVED PROPOSED FENCE (E) DRIVEWAY TO BE RESURFACED NEW GAS LINE NEW WATER LINE NEW ELECTRIC LINE JOINT TRENCH L G W INDICATES AREA WITHIN r LRDA LIMIT LINE (SLOPE L UNDER 30 %) LINE (TYP.) PROPOSED RESIDENCE PROPOSED PERMEABLE PAVERS AT DRIVEWAY PROPOSED HARDSCAPE EXISTING TREE TO REMAIN 1111 —J E EXISTING TREE TO BE REMOVED, NEW SANITARY SEWER LINE — SS JT TREE PROTECTION FENCING METROliA DESIGN GROUP ARCHITECTURE• PLANNING• INTERIORS 1475 S BASCOM AVE SUITE 208 CAMPBELL, CA 95008 (408)871-1071 phone (408)871-1072 fax www.metroarchitects.com The plans, ideas and design on this drawing are the property of the designer,divised solely for this contract. Plans shall not be used, in whole or in part, for any purpose for which they were not intended without the written permission of METRO DESIGN GROUP. PROJECT NAME COREY RESIDENCE 26 ALPINE AVE LOS GATOS, CA 95030 APN# 529-37-042 REVISIONS n PC1 10-27-16 D.Z. AZ PC2 1-17-17 D.Z. A PC2 6-26-17 D.Z. PROPOSED SITE PLAN SITE LEGEND DATE : 1 -17 -17 SCALE : 1" = 10'-0" DRAWN BY : TS / DZ CHECKED BY : TS ARCHITECT : TOM SLOAN PROJECT NO : 16621 SHEET NUMBER A-1.O z m N CD l0 Corey PC2 6-26-17.pin 27 JACKSON STREET UPPER FLOOR — —0— SUBFLOOR = 403'-6" (± 0'-0") LOWER FLOOR -- F. SLAB = 393'-6" (-10'-0") INDICATES SECTION JOGG - TYP. 26 ALPINE AVENUE UPPER FLOOR —0— SUBFLOOR = 403'-6" (± 0'-0") LOWER FLOOR -- F. SLAB = 393'-6" (-10'-0") 26 ALPINE AVENUE INDICATES LIMIT OF 30 % SLOPE (LEAST RESTRICTIVE DEVELOPMENT AREA) A ■ I- ���1�.1��♦••••X ♦ 1. SITE CONSTRAINTS DIAGRAM INDICATES AREA WITHIN LRDA LIMIT LINE (SLOPE UNDER 30 %) INDICATES AREA OUTSIDE LRDA LIMIT LINE (SLOPE 30 % OR MORE) PROPOSED RESIDENCE PROPOSED DRIVEWAY PROPOSED HARDSCAPE 38 ALPINE AVENUE PROPOSED RESIDENCE INDICATES SITE SECTION LINE 15 OAK HILL WY. APN#: 529-35-006 R 1:8, 24,676.26 SQ. FT. Default W [D: 102643 Lat'`Li ng A II ... •_•.......•_•_•=L •:'="- P ... •_•_._•_•_•_•_,• .... ELEVATION COLUMN TUB FOR FENCE POSTS 2x4 P.T.D.F. FLAT ON TOP OF POSTS 4x4 P.T.D.F. POST @ 8'-0" O.C. 1x8 P.T.D.F. STAGGERED 2x4 P.T.D.F. FLAT ON TOP 2x8 P.T.D.F. PLAN VIEW 2x4 P.T.D.F. FLAT ON TOP OF POSTS 1x2 P.T.D.F. EACH SIDE OF 1x8 4x4 P.T.D.F. POST @ 8'-0" O.C. 1x8 P.T.D.F. STAGGERED 1x2 P.T.D.F. EACH SIDE OF 1x8 2x4 P.T.D.F. FLAT ON TOP 2x8 P.T.D.F. KICK BOARD 12" DIA. CONCRETE PIER - SLOPED AT TOP INDICATES GRADE ELEVATION GOOD NEIGHBOR FENCE - DETAIL SCALE: 1/2"= 1'-0" 25 ALPINE A APN#: 529-38 R 1:20, 44,550, SQ. 2. SURROUNDING PARCEL PLAN SECTION 1 Tools 1,7.40 h 4, METRO DESIGN GROUP ARCHITECTURE• PLANNING• INTERIORS 1475 S BASCOM AVE SUITE 208 CAMPBELL, CA 95008 (408)871-1071 phone (408)871-1072 fax www.metroarchitects.com The plans, ideas and design on this drawing are the property of the designer,divised solely for this contract. Plans shall not be used, in whole or in part, for any purpose for which they were not intended without the written permission of METRO DESIGN GROUP. Oc RESIDENCE 26 LOS APN# PROJECT COREY ALPINE GATOS, 529-37-042 AVE NAME CA 95030 REVISIONS n PC1 10-27-16 D.Z. A PC2 1-17-17 D.Z. SITE DIAGRAMS SITE CONSTRAINTS DIAGRAM SURROUNDING PARCEL PLAN SITE SECTIONS GOOD NEIGHBOR FENCE DETAIL DATE : 1 -17 -17 SCALE : DRAWN BY : D.Z. CHECKED BY : TS ARCHITECT : TOM SLOAN PROJECT NO : 16621 SHEET NUMBER A-1.1 Corey PC2 6-26-17.pin 400 440 430 420 410 400 390 380 400 440 430 410 INDICATES (E) FENCE - TYP. 400 390 380 STREET PROFILE 'A' SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0" II �rt� it S7�r�iv 11 71i�1 Yl.� idi �aarflS[ `� yjJ �� �� �811117�1�. ,.- , i ... 1 Li ..ate ----- - downiandows lim INDICATES (E) SITE WALL AND FENCE - TYP. 38 ALPINE AVENUE PROPOSED RESIDENCE 26 ALPINE AVENUE 0 0 �e 'IiP • o ag °� , �,a^� o °tq�Vgypt�,o�- �,1., V� _ S� r i✓��, "'�"d�r�y ;P� ski fV l; , {' � .4 OE � � sv 9 v •�'r $ '' i vy i ve J� J °�T..d a b 4 �n :scA )i i.ti �►.,,, !A. �o .w. - '►'�' "`+�' i Y�.' °�fi' �i ` '/ ' ` t3��iZt9. 1 aC� �' C {/� o� t� d M►�Ii C`+ tl d F+ ° Pro` ', 14 8 ry L. m'L° .`� qt• j� 71L �N°V �`� c7v '� • r� �rl`'i; �. �� _,�....���f1`W��4J ..r ;gyp °` te'/Psa �`'�'�� i p a . ma y . eirl�yu�' „r t 1. vpp/,� o , ,Y n'r u ��'" 'Ss% ® �� �)° g S Y�I' �.'i „(� 00, �.�r ��. .f o � 4 `r a rW iP i�r f�� A f 1" a �^ ��,j�� yd t� -..-� ��.±-'�ti�a V�`Y",'� Q--�"Lr '� !� .,_�,.'a° � r e ._ - _- n � gG.'\. �b• , �. M._� In �"as4 ` _w <<...✓.__�. � la dR' V� ��� - 19 ALPINE AVENUE INDICATES SECTION JOGG - TYP. a1.!mii!�!iIIIIIMI_ M= rIMFEii ii amai p INDICATES (E) FENCE - TYP. INDICATES SECTION JOGG - TYP. 27 JACKSON STREET 25 ALPINE AVENUE 8 O 0 b 0-151 400 440 380 400 1� 440 -430 420 -410 400 390 380 METRO DESIGN GROUP ARCHITECTURE• PLANNING- INTERIORS 1475 S BASCOM AVE SUITE 208 CAMPBELL, CA 95008 (408)871-1071 phone (408)871-1072 fax www.metroarchitects.com The plans, ideas and design on this drawing are the property of the designer,divised solely for this contract. Plans shall not be used, in whole or in part, for any purpose for which they were not intended without the written permission of METRO DESIGN GROUP. Oc RESIDENCE 26 LOS APN# PROJECT COREY ALPINE GATOS, 529-37-042 AVE NAME CA 95030 REVISIONS STREET PROFILES STREET PROFILE 'A' STREET PROFILE 'B' DATE : 1 -17 -17 SCALE : AS NOTED DRAWN BY : DZ CHECKED BY : TS ARCHITECT : TOM SLOAN PROJECT NO : 16621 SHEET NUMBER A-1.2 STREET PROFILE 'B' SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0" Corey PC2 6-26-17.pin NOTE: SHADOW STUDY FOR ALL DIAGRAMS DOES NOT INCLUDE ANY EXISTING TREES SPRING EQUINOX SUMMER SOLSTICE AUTUMNAL EQUINOX WINTER SOLSTICE METROIIA DESIGN GROUP ARCHITECTURE• PLANNING• INTERIORS 1475 S BASCOM AVE SUITE 208 CAMPBELL, CA 95008 (408)871-1071 phone (408)871-1072 fax www.metroarchitects.com The plans, ideas and design on this drawing are the property of the designer,divised solely for this contract. Plans shall not be used, in whole or in part, for any purpose for which they were not intended without the written permission of METRO DESIGN GROUP. Oc RESIDENCE 26 LOS APN# PROJECT COREY ALPINE GATOS, 529-37-042 AVE NAME CA 95030 REVISIONS SHADOW STUDY DIAGRAM DATE : 1 -17 -17 SCALE : N.T.S. DRAWN BY : DZ CHECKED BY : TS ARCHITECT : TOM SLOAN PROJECT NO : 16621 SHEET NUMBER A-1.3 z m Corey PC2 6-26-17.pin (P) LIGHT 'C' -TYP. OF 5 PROPOSED STEP LIGHT 'C' HINKLEY LIGHTING 9ICEBZ BRONZE LIGHT 3" HEIGHT ADA COMPLIANT LED OUTDOOR STEP LIGHT - LUNA COLLECTION PATIO 0 'A' PORCH GARAGE PATIO / 'A' LIGHTWELL PROPOSED RESIDENCE Product Details for the Hinkley Lighting 58508BZ in Bronze Single Light 3" Height ADA Compliant LED Outdoor Step Light from the Luna Collection Features: • Made of zinc -aluminum alloy • Energy efficient • ADA Compliant • Suitable for wet locations Lamping Technology: • LED - Light Emitting Diode: Highly efficient diodes produce little heat and have an extremely long lifespan. Specifications: • Bulb Included: Yes • Bulb Type: LED • Dark Sky: No • Extension: 0.5" (measured from mounting surface to furthest protruding point on fixture) • Height: 3" • LED: Yes PATIO (P) LIGHT 'B' -TYP. OF 6 @ LOWER FLOOR -TYP. OF 7 @ UPPER FLOOR • Material: Aluminum • Number of Bulbs 1 • Product weight: 1 Ibs • Sloped Ceiling Compatible. No • Title 24: No • UL Rating: Wet Location • Voltage. 120v • Wattage:4 • Watts Per Bulb: 4 • Width: 4.5" (measured from furthest point left to furthest point right on fixture) Compliance: • UL Listed - Indicates whether a product meets standards and compliance guidelines set by Underwriters Laboratories. This listing determines what types of rooms or environments a product can be used in safely. • ADA Compliance - The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). Fixtures hung between 27" and BD" above the floor must have an extension of 4" or less; this applies to wall lights hung in walkways, halls, corridors, passageways or aisles. Ceiling Fixtures must be hung no lower than 80". TOTAL (P) LIGHT 'A': 6 TOTAL (P) LIGHT 'B': 25 TOTAL (P) LIGHT 'C': 5 PROPOSED EXTERIOR LIGHTING PLAN PROPOSED WALL MOUNTED LIGHT 'A' HINKLEY LIGHTING 13IBZ-LED BRONZE 1675 " HEIGHT ADA COMPLIANT DARK SKY LED OUTDOOR WALL SCONCE - LUNA COLLECTION Product Details for the Hinkley Lighting 1660BZ in Bronze 16.75" Height 2 ADA Compliant Light Dark Sky Outdoor Wall Sconce from the Luna Collection Features: • Bronze metal cylinder shade included with the Bronze finish • Satin Black metal cylinder shade included with the Satin Black finish • Titanium metal cylinder shade included with the Titanium finish • Made of extruded aluminum • Designed to cast a soft ambient light over a wide area • ADA Compliant • Dark Sky Compliant • Suitable for wet locations Lamping Technologies: • Bulb Base - Bi Pin The bi pin, or 'bi pin socket', is a standard from the IEC (International Electrotechnical Commission) for lamp fittings. These are used on many small incandescent light bulbs. Specifications: • ADA: Yes • Backplate Height: 16" • Backplate Width. 6" • Bulb Base: Bi Pin • Bulb Included: Yes • Bulb Base: Bi Pin • Bulb Included: Yes • Bulb Shape: MR16 • Bulb Type. Halogen • Dark Sky: Yes • Energy Star: No • Extension: 3.5" (measured from mounting surface to furthest protruding point on fixture) • HCO: 10, 13.5" (height from center of outlet) • Height:16.75" • Location Rating: Wet Location • Material: Aluminum • Number of Bulbs: 2 • Product Weight: 7 Ibs • Shade Material: Metal • Voltage 120v • Wattage:40 • Watts Per Bulb: 20 Compliance: • Dark Sky Lighting: Known as Cut Off Lighting, or Friendly Lighting, Dark Sky refers to lighting fixtures that reduce excess lighting and reduces sky glow to eliminate wasted energy allowing the night sky to shine. • ADA Compliance - The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). Fixtures hung between 27" and BD" above the floor must have an extension of 4" or less; this applies to wall lights hung in walkways, halls, corridors, passageways or aisles. Ceiling Fixtures must be hung no lower than 80". PROPOSED CEILING FLUSH MOUNT LIGHT 'B' HINKLEY LIGHTING 1353BZ-LED BRONZE 1IGHT LED DARK SKY OUTDOOR FLUSH MOUNT CEILING FIXTURE - LUNA COLLECTION Product Details for the Hinkley Lighting 1663BZ-LED in Bronze Single Light LED Outdoor Flush Mount Ceiling Fixture from the Luna Collection Features: • Etched glass round shade • Made of extruded aluminum • Designed to cast light in a downward direction • Dark sky compatible • Capable of being dimmed - allowing you to set your desired illumination levels when used with dimmable bulbs • Suitable for damp locations • Energy efficient Lamping Technologies: • LED - Light Emitting Diode: Highly efficient diodes produce little heat and have an extremely long Iitespan. Specifications: • Bulb Base: Integrated LED • Bulb Included: Yes • Bulb Type: LED • Color Rendering Index (CR]): 90 • Color Temperature. 2700K • Dark Sky: Yes • Dimmable Yes • Energy Efficient. Yes • Energy Star: No • Height:7.25 • Includes Glass Guard: No • LED: Yes • Light Direction: Down Lighting • Location Rating Damp Location • Lumens:900 • Material: Aluminum • Number of Bulbs: 1 • Product Weight: 5 • Shade: Yes • Shade Color White Compliance: • Dark Sky Lighting: Known as Cut Off Lighting, or Friendly Lighting, Dark Sky refers to lighting fixtures that reduce excess lighting and reduces sky grow to eliminate wasted energy allowing the night sky to shine. 111, METROAri: DESIGN GROUP ARCHITECTURE• PLANNING• INTERIORS 1475 S BASCOM AVE SUITE 208 CAMPBELL, CA 95008 (408)871-1071 phone (408)871-1072 fax www.metroarchitects.com The plans, ideas and design on this drawing are the property of the designer,divised solely for this contract. Plans shall not be used, in whole or in part, for any purpose for which they were not intended without the written permission of METRO DESIGN GROUP. RESIDENCE 26 LOS APN# PROJECT COREY ALPINE GATOS, 529-37-042 AVE NAME CA 95030 REVISIONS )ROPOSED EXTERIOR LIGHTING PLAN SITE LEGEND DATE : 1 -17 -17 SCALE : 1/8" = 1'-0" DRAWN BY : DZ CHECKED BY : TS ARCHITECT : TOM SLOAN PROJECT NO : 16621 SHEET NUMBER A-1.4 z m Corey PC2 6-26-17.pin , r J 89'-21/2" FLOOR PLAN LEGEND (N) INDICATES NEW FEATURES INDICATES NEW 2x4 WALLS INDICATES NEW 2x6 WALLS INDICATES WALL W/ SOUND INSULATION INDICATES CEILING TRANSITION INDICATES CROSS SECTION MARKER SEE A-6 SHEETS INDICATES NEW WINDOW INDICATES NEW DOOR INDICATES NEW CABINETRY INDICATES NEW PLUMBING FIXTURE INDICATES NEW WALL MOUNTED DOWNLIGHT ENERGY EFFICIENT LIGHTING O RECESSED DOWNLIGHT ENERGY EFFICIENT LIGHTING 30'-31/2" 58'-111/2" .34'=3Jz" 8'-51/2" 7,_1/2" 7'-41/2„ 19'-1" 16'-111/2" M N 1 HANICAL 4 N r INDICATES 20'-0" x 20'-0" CLEAR - REQUIRED PARKING DIMENSIONS / / UP STORAG E 14'-9" STORAGE 0 0 F.S. = 393'-6" 8'_1/2" INDICATES 400'-10" ELEVATION TOPO LINE ENCLOSED AREA DOES NOT EXTEND MORE THAN 4'-0" ABOVE EXISTING GRADE J r GARAGE F.S. = 395'-10" 20'-61/2" J i i TRASH ITIRON' 6 ABVEA l}JN1T- 1 I I 22'-11" r BEDROOM L J 7'-8" BATH ROOM 10'-2" 0- r BEDROOM L J Ij II L----- 11 En L2 M 15'-51/2" 51/2 INDICATES 398'-6" ELEVATION TOPO LINE ENCLOSED AREA DOES NOT EXTEND MORE THAN 4'-0" ABOVE EXISTING GRADE MULTI PURPOSE ROOM v LIGHTWELL 23T-51/2" 12'-11/2" 29'-9" 88'-3" A-5 A-5 METRO/AFAL DESIGN GROUP ARCHITECTURE• PLANNING• INTERIORS 1475 S BASCOM AVE SUITE 208 CAMPBELL, CA 95008 (408)871-1071 phone (408)871-1072 fax www.metroarchitects.com The plans, ideas and design on this drawing are the property of the designer,divised solely for this contract. Plans shall not be used, in whole or in part, for any purpose for which they were not intended without the written permission of METRO DESIGN GROUP. Oc RESIDENCE 26 LOS APN# PROJECT COREY ALPINE GATOS, 529-37-042 AVE NAME CA 95030 REVISIONS n PC1 10-27-16 D.Z. AZ PC2 1-17-17 D.Z. PROPOSED LOWER FLOOR PLAN DATE : 1 -17 -17 SCALE : 1/4" = 1'-0" DRAWN BY : TS CHECKED BY : TS ARCHITECT : TOM SLOAN PROJECT NO : 16621 SHEET NUMBER A-2.O m Corey PC2 6-26-17.pin 91'-41/2" 12'-8" 63'1/2' 15'-8" M N 1-1 8" CLOSET ♦ 419, ♦ si ,7f T MASTER --BATHROOM PORCH 4'-7" r 1 L 1r J r 1. J INDICATES 409'-6" E4EVATION TOPO LINE ENCLOSED AREA DOES NOT EXTEND MORE THAN 4'-0" ABOVE EXISTING GRADE J \ MASTER BEDROOM 18'-9" BASEMENT AREA cp 4'-7" 14'-1" CELLAR AREA ■ ■ 4'-11" IF UI PORCH 6'-1" LAUNDRY 6'-81/2" 6'-0" i� BATH F.F. = 405'-10" 18'-10" ENTRY F.F. = 403'-6" 211-81/2" PATIO UP DN LIBRARY / BEDROOM WATER FEATURE 2'-61/2„ 1/:" 1 L COVERED BALCONY ♦ 23'-11/2° O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 KITCHEN DINING = 1- 38'-14" 20'-91/2" 1'-101/2" 1, FAMILY ROOM 18'-81/2" COVERED BALCONY r 231-3" 8'-71/2" 3'-6" 11'-0" 211-101/2" 911-41/2" A-5 A-5 FLOOR PLAN LEGEND (N) INDICATES NEW FEATURES INDICATES NEW 2x4 WALLS INDICATES NEW 2x6 WALLS INDICATES WALL W/ SOUND INSULATION INDICATES CEILING TRANSITION INDICATES CROSS SECTION MARKER SEE A-6 SHEETS INDICATES NEW WINDOW INDICATES NEW DOOR INDICATES NEW CABINETRY INDICATES NEW PLUMBING FIXTURE INDICATES NEW WALL MOUNTED DOWNLIGHT ENERGY EFFICIENT LIGHTING O RECESSED DOWNLIGHT ENERGY EFFICIENT LIGHTING METRO//A DESIGN GROUP ARCHITECTURE• PLANNING• INTERIORS 1475 S BASCOM AVE SUITE 208 CAMPBELL, CA 95008 (408)871-1071 phone (408)871-1072 fax www.metroarchitects.com The plans, ideas and design on this drawing are the property of the designer,divised solely for this contract. Plans shall not be used, in whole or in part, for any purpose for which they were not intended without the written permission of METRO DESIGN GROUP. \c RESIDENCE 26 LOS APN# PROJECT COREY ALPINE GATOS, 529-37-042 AVE NAME CA 95030 REVISIONS A PC2 12-19-16 D.Z. AZ PC2 1-17-17 D.Z. A PC2 6-26-17 D.Z. PROPOSED UPPER FLOOR PLAN DATE : 1 -17 -17 SCALE : 1/4" = 1'-0" DRAWN BY : DZ CHECKED BY : TS ARCHITECT : TOM SLOAN PROJECT NO : 16621 SHEET NUMBER A-2.1 m Corey PC2 6-26-17.pin INDICATES CAST IRON IN WALL DOWNSPOUTS W/ SCUPPERS - TYP. H.P. = 4151-6" D.S. D.S. D.S. D D • .1, 4- 4, 4, 4- 4, 4, 4- , 4- .1- .i, y 4- 4, 4- , .1, .1, .1, 4- 4, 4, 4- . .1, 4, d, 4- 4, 4, 4, , J- 4, 4, 4 4- 4, 4, - .1. .1, .1, 4, 4, 4 y . J, J- .I, 4, 4, 4, 4- , J- 4, 4, 4- 4, 4, 4 , .1- .1, .1, 4, 4, 4, 4, .1- .l, 4, 4- 4, 4, 4, , 4, 4, 4- 4- 4, 4, 4, • J, 4, 4, 4- 4, 4, 4- - 4- 4- 4, 4, 4, 4, - J, J- 4, 4,4,4,4, • .1, .1, .1, 4- 4, 4, 4, , .l, .l, 4- 4.4,4,4- - J, J, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4. - J, J, 4, 4- 4, 4- I, 4- 4, 4- y 4- 4, y 4, 4, 4, 4, - 4- J, .I, 4, 4, 4, 4, - J, J, J- 4 4- 4- 4, , 4, 4, d, 4, 4, 4, 4. .'61 4, J. J- J- 4- 4- 4- 4- 4, 4 4, 4, 4, 4 4 - J- 4,.I, 4- 4- 4 I4- - J- J- d- y 4, 4- 4, - J, 4, 4- 4- 4 4- 4 4. 4, 4 - 4, d, 4, y 4, 4- 4, - 4, 4- 4, 4- 4, 4 4- - .I- 4, 4. 4, 4, 4 ly - 4- J, 4. 4, 4, - 4- - J- .I- J, 4- 4, 4- 4, , J, J, .L 4, 4, 4 y , .L J, .I, 4- 4, 4- 4 - .L 4- 4, 4, 4- 4- 4- 4- 4- 4 4. I4- - J- 4, 4- ' .L .1, .L •�.. t. .i. .L 4- y 4- 4- 4- y 4- 4- 4, 4, 4- 4, 4- 4- 4, 4- 4- 4- y 4, 4- 4- 4- 4- 4- 4- 4- 4- y 4- 4- y 4- 4- y 4, y y 4- 4, 4- 4, 4, 4- 4- 4- 4- 4- 4- 4, 4, 4, 4- 4, 4, 4- 4, 4- 4- 4- 4, 4, 4- 4, 4, 4- 4, 4, y 4- 4- 4- 4- 4- y 4, 4- 4- 4, 4- 4, 4, 4, 4- 4, 4, 4, 4, .1, 4- 4- 4, 4- 4- 4- 4, 4- y 4- 4- 4, 4- y y 4- 4- 4- 4- 4- 4, 4- 4, 4- 4, 4- 4, 4, 4, 4- 4, 4, 4, 4- 4, 4- 4 � 4 4, 4 4- 4, 4e a- y y y y 4- y y 4, .1- y 4, ti, y y 4- 4- 4, 4, 4- 4, 4- 4, 4, 4, 4 4- y 4 4, 4, 4- 4, 4- 4- 4- 4- 4, 4, 4- 4- 4, 4, 4- y 4- 4, 4, 4 4, 4 4- 4- 4- 4- 4- 4, 4, 4- 4, '4' GREEN ROOF SYSTEM: EXTENSIVE GARDEN ROOF BY `1' y "HYDROTECH USA" 4- 4- y 4- 4- 4, 4- 4, 4, 4, 4, 4- 4- 4- 4 4- 4, 4- 4- 4- 4- 4- 4- 4, 4- 4- 4e 4, 4- 4 4- 4, 4 y 4, 4, 4, 4- 4- 4, 4- 4- 4- 4- 4- 4- 4, 4- 4, 4 4, 4, 4, y 4- 4, 4e 4- 4- 4, . 4, 4, 4, 4- 4- 4, 4, 4, 4. 4- 4- 4, 4, 4, 4, y 4, 4, 4e 4- 4, 4. 4, 4- 4, 4, 4- 4- 4, 4- 4- 4- 4- 4, 4- 4- 4, 4- 4, 4e 4- 4- 4- 4- y 4 4, 4- 2'-0 H.P. = 417'-21/2" J- J, 4- 4- 4- 4, y 4- 4- 4- 4, 4- 4- 4, 4- 4, INDICATES'KALLWALL' SKYLIGHT 4- 4- 4- 4- 4- 4, 4- 4, 4, 4- 4- 4, 4, 4, 4e 4, 4- 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4 4- 4, 4, 4, 4, 4- 4, 4, 4- 4, 4. 4, 4, 4, 4- 4- 4, 4, 4e 4, 4- 4, 4, 4 4, 4 4, 4- 4- 4, 4, 4e 4- 4, 4, 4, 4, 4- 4, 4- 4- 4- 4e 4- 4- 4, 4, 4 4- y 4, y 4- 4- 4 L 4, 4, 4, 4, 4 4, 4, 4, 4 4- 4, 4,4. '1' 4- 4, 4- 4. 4, 4- 4- 3- 4- 4- 4- 4- 4'- 4, 4, 4, 4, 4 4- 4- 4- 4- 4, 4... 4- 4- 4, 4- 4- 4, 4- 4- 4- t .1, 4e 4, 4, 4, 4 4, 4, 4- 4,4- 4 4, 4e 4- 4- 4, 4, 4- 4- 4- 4,y 4- 4, 4, 4, 4, 4- NI, 4,y 4, 4- 4, , 4- 4- 4- 4- 4- .1,4, 4- 4- 4- 4e 4, 4, 4, 4. 4, 4- 4- 4- 4- 4- 4- 4, 4, 4, 4, H.P. = 419'-51/2" INDICATES INTEGRATED GUTTER -TYP. L 1% SLOPE TYP. ` , V / / / / / / CLASS 'A' GAF 'EVERGUARD ® TPO' 60 MIL SINGLE PLY - WHITE COLOR / / / 1% SLOPE TYP. 7-1 / / / /// / The Extensive Garden Roof Assembly is ideally suited for locations that will receive little maintenance or where structural capabilities are o concern. Unlike Intensive Garden Roof Assemblies, Extensive Garden Roofs are not intended for recreational use and are typically chosen for their appearance or to help reduce the "urban heat island" effect and minimize stormwater rune -off. Extensive roofs only require a shallow growing media depth, generally as little as 3"-6' (depending on the region). and therefore add little weight to the roof structure below when compared to a standard ballasted PMR roof. Recommended plant types for extensive roofs need to be drought, wind and frost resistant. such as self -generating sedums. herbs, grasses and other vegetation that can withstand harsh growing conditions. The water stored in the growing media and drainage/retention layer is sufficient to sustain the drought resistant plants between periods of normal rainfall. Thinner assemblies and very lightweight growing media blends are available for Extensive Garden Roof Assemblies. Contact us for specifics. Features of the Extensive Garden Roof Assembly: • Depth (3'-6"ofgrowing media) • Reduce and delay stormwater runoff • Help to mitigate the urban heat island effect • Requires minimal maintenance • Can be used on flat or sloping roofs • Garden Tray GT15- available for modular applications • Vegetation options- plugs, cuttings, InstaGreen- Sedum Carpet or InstaGreen" Sedum Tile Typical Application: An Extensive Garden Roof Assembly can be applied to flat roofs and sloping roofs with a pitch of up to 12:12 or 45°, provided the appropriate measures are taken to cope with the shear forces and soil retention. Extensive roofs are typically lightweight and can be installed over a variety of structures including metal roof decks. H.P. = 417'-31/2" 1% SLOPE TYP. ` , V H.P. = 416'-10" H.P. = 416'-11" H.P. = 417'-1" �o 1 CLASS 'A' GAF 'EVERGUARD ® TPO' 60 MIL SINGLE PLY - WHITE COLOR J 1% SLOPE TYP. , V H.P. = 417-0" INDICATES UPPER FLOOR BUILDING LINE -TYP. Typical Extensive Assembly Extensive Assembly over metal ded • t. METROa / 4 DESIGN GROUP ARCHITECTURE• PLANNING. INTERIORS 1475 S BASCOM AVE SUITE 208 CAMPBELL, CA 95008 (408)871-1071 phone (408)871-1072 fax www.metroarchitects.com The plans, ideas and design on this drawing are the property of the designer,divised solely for this contract. Plans shall not be used, in whole or in part, for any purpose for which they were not intended without the written permission of METRO DESIGN GROUP. Oc RESIDENCE 26 LOS APN# PROJECT COREY ALPINE GATOS, 529-37-042 AVE NAME CA 95030 REVISIONS A PC2 1-17-17 D.Z. PROPOSED ROOF PLAN DATE : 1 -17 -17 SCALE : 1/4" = 1'-0" DRAWN BY : DZ CHECKED BY : TS ARCHITECT : TOM SLOAN PROJECT NO : 16621 SHEET NUMBER A-3.O Corey PC2 6-26-17.pin T.P. = 418'-4" + 14'-10") H.P. = 415'-6" T.P. = 413'-6" + 10'—O") r� 1 • - 6 J - r E.P. = 410'-61/8" UPPER FLOOR SUBFLOOR = 403'-6" (± 0'-0") J • > T 1 < > --J r 4' : 1 ) A J `1 I `1 l �J L -_J ) - J ' V J , ' J y 7-`11- , _ _ : Z --, ss> < INDICATES EXISTING GRADE TO REMAIN AT THE FACE OF THE WALL INDICATES EXISTING GRADE AT THE FACE OF THE WALL INDICATES PROPOSED GRADE AT THE FACE OF THE WALL 1 \ E.P. = 407'-11" -3 _JI N INDICATES EXISTING GRADE RETAINED BEHIND PROPOSED RETAINING WALLS INDICATES MAXIMUM 4'-0" HIGH RETAINING WALLS —TYP. AT ENTRY STAIR 403'-8" 404'-3" 401'-11" 400'-1" 397'-11" 396'-2" H U 6 9 L L H.P. = 417'-21/2" 10/0 SLOPE T.W. = 404'-3" INDICATES EXISTING GRADE AT THE FACE OF THE WALL PROPOSED FRONT ELEVATION: NORTHEAST SCALE : 1/4" = 1'-0" 399'-8" / 400'-3" PORCH- DETAIL SECTION 'A' AT ENTRY STAIR INDICATES 30' VERTICAL DISTANCE FROM THE EXISTING GRADE AT WALL FACE INDICATES 30' VERTICAL DISTANCE FROM THE PROPOSED GRADE AT WALL FACE 1 SLOPE 10 B.W. = 396'-2" 11 goo=DE❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑❑❑❑❑❑❑ ❑❑❑❑❑❑ ❑❑❑❑❑❑ i❑❑❑❑❑❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑❑❑❑❑❑❑ �❑❑❑❑❑❑ — 1❑ 3 12 ENTRY = 416'-10" J> c INDICATES EXISTING GRADE AT THE FACE OF THE WALL EXTERIOR FINISHES 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 r L- ROOF: ROOF: ROOF FASCIA: EXTERIOR WALLS AND GARAGE DOOR: EXTERIOR WALLS: EXTERIOR WALLS: EXTERIOR WALLS: WINDOWS & EXTERIOR DOORS: ENTRY DOOR: GUARDRAIL: RETAINING WALLS, PLANTERS: DRIVEWAY, WALKWAYS AND PATIOS PERMEABLE PAVERS: T.P.= 414'-10" (+ 11'-4") 1 L (r ' >L. J <21 (`__, r'�-- `J/1 l O (,jr‘) ! �-r, GARAGE J • ---`— 2-'1_ —! 0— F.SLAB = 395'-10" ^ (si ,)�i L L��' y `j T I ' r( • J ) v � J' � J I 1� r `\ .1I ' d \) I , I CLASS 'A' GAF 'EVERGUARD ® TPO' 60 MIL SINGLE PLY - MANSARD COLOR GREEN ROOF SYSTEM: EXTENSIVE GARDEN ROOF BY "HYDROTECH USA" CUSTOM 24 GA. PRE -PAINTED 'GALVALUME' METAL - DARK BRONZE COLOR GREY WOOD SIDING - 8" EXPOSURE 'COOPER STONE' - CHESTNUT LEDGESTONE - NATURAL THIN STONE VENEER ALUMINUM CLAD 'DARK BRONZE' ANODIZED ALUMINUM 'KALWALL' - WALL SYSTEM TRANSLUCENT PANELS ALUMINUM WOOD CLAD 'DARK BRONZE' ANODIZED ALUMINUM CUSTOM STEEL DOOR 'DARK BRONZE' COLOR STEEL - 'DARK BRONZE' COLOR AND SAFETY GLASS POURED IN PLACE CONCRETE GREY COLOR ECO-FRIENDLY 'PERMEABLE MISSION PAVEMENT' - PREMIUM PETALUMA COLOR BY 'BASALITE' INDICATES PROPOSED FINISHED GRADE AT THE FACE OF THE WALL UPPER FLOOR e SUBFLOOR = 405'-10" (+ 2'-4") 1 , // V ./ \rJ 1 z__J." / J ( r- N> r - < �� ,.J �1 / , V J / i (- I ( , r/ [r-� r - ) rJ v _ J J( J ) ( C^� - L ) I' 7J _J METRO DESIGN GROUP ARCHITECTURE• PLANNING• INTERIORS 1475 S BASCOM AVE SUITE 208 CAMPBELL, CA 95008 (408)871-1071 phone (408)871-1072 fax www.metroarchitects.com The plans, ideas and design on this drawing are the property of the designer,divised solely for this contract. Plans shall not be used, in whole or in part, for any purpose for which they were not intended without the written permission of METRO DESIGN GROUP. RESIDENCE 26 LOS APN# PROJECT COREY ALPINE GATOS, 529-37-042 AVE NAME CA 95030 REVISIONS ,/ \ PC2 1-17-17 D.Z. PROPOSED EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS FRONT ELEVATION, NE DATE : 1 -17 -17 SCALE : 1/4" = 1'-0" DRAWN BY : DZ CHECKED BY : TS ARCHITECT : TOM SLOAN PROJECT NO : 16621 SHEET NUMBER A-4.O J r- �4,'� -- UPPER FLOOR SUBFLOOR = 405'-10" �+ (+ 2'-4") / o GARAGE F.SLAB = 395'-10" (- 7'-8") Corey PC2 6-26-17.pin 1 N.P. = 416'-11" INDICATES EXISTING GRADE AT THE FACE OF THE WALL AC PAD = 389'-8" (- 13'-10") INDICATES EXISTING GRADE TO REMAIN AT THE FACE OF THE WALL --H.P. = 419'-51/2" H.P. = 419'-4" ///< < j j jj r'I I \ S ^ I MIEN 7 r- 1 rJ rsi lJ 1 ` / i 11 \1 //) 1 ) \, > / 1 / 1 ( r =.I (,1__,, f ..7 (rJ r-' is —; 1 / �t 1.'"' n 1.^l / / ( "' <r-' ) c, { �` f f J (` (r C' fir` l� (� > i �,� , \ l , / J r k�/(J \J 11 -I I / J J ) , h,_ j s-1:\ - - .1',,.,. - ! 47.1 ( 1 \ , " % J E.P. = 388'_8" v ji , j\,,,;4),-)54 -I, , 3 ,,,v,,,t- ,_\ , ;`� (- ,. y VI ^�JJ F.G. = 392'-10" E.P. = 385'-6" PROPOSED RIGHT SIDE ELEVATION: NORTHWEST SCALE : 1/4" = 1'-0" INDICATES EXISTING GRADE TO REMAIN AT THE FACE OF THE WALL INDICATES 30' VERTICAL DISTANCE FROM THE EXISTING GRADE AT WALL FACE INDICATES 30' VERTICAL DISTANCE FROM THE PROPOSED GRADE AT WALL FACE INDICATES EXISTING GRADE AT THE FACE OF THE WALL INDICATES PROPOSED GRADE AT THE FACE OF THE WALL F.G. = 392'-10" EXTERIOR FINISHES ROOF: ROOF: ROOF FASCIA: EXTERIOR WALLS AND GARAGE DOOR: EXTERIOR WALLS: EXTERIOR WALLS: EXTERIOR WALLS: WINDOWS & EXTERIOR DOORS: ENTRY DOOR: GUARDRAIL: RETAINING WALLS, PLANTERS: DRIVEWAY, WALKWAYS AND PATIOS PERMEABLE PAVERS: 1---4' .......17.17.-- ....._.....mr arwwirfer;F:47 ( (r 0 -- ( minim imm MAMIE!� Tom_ INDICATES EXISTING GRADE AT THE FACE OF THE WALL INDICATES PROPOSED GRADE AT THE FACE OF THE WALL CLASS 'A' GAF 'EVERGUARD ® TPO' 60 MIL SINGLE PLY - MANSARD COLOR GREEN ROOF SYSTEM: EXTENSIVE GARDEN ROOF BY "HYDROTECH USA" CUSTOM 24 GA. PRE -PAINTED 'GALVALUME' METAL - DARK BRONZE COLOR GREY WOOD SIDING - 8" EXPOSURE 'COOPER STONE' - CHESTNUT LEDGESTONE - NATURAL THIN STONE VENEER ALUMINUM CLAD 'DARK BRONZE' ANODIZED ALUMINUM 'KALWALL' - WALL SYSTEM TRANSLUCENT PANELS ALUMINUM WOOD CLAD 'DARK BRONZE' ANODIZED ALUMINUM CUSTOM STEEL DOOR 'DARK BRONZE' COLOR STEEL - 'DARK BRONZE' COLOR AND SAFETY GLASS POURED IN PLACE CONCRETE GREY COLOR ECO-FRIENDLY 'PERMEABLE MISSION PAVEMENT - PREMIUM PETALUMA COLOR BY 'BASALITE' TOP OF ROOF = 417'-0" (+ 13'-6") T.P. = 415'-10" (+ 12'-4") - UPPER FLOOR SUBFLOOR = 403'-6" (± O'-0") METRO DESIGN GROUP ARCHITECTURE• PLANNING. INTERIORS 1475 S BASCOM AVE SUITE 208 CAMPBELL, CA 95008 (408)871-1071 phone (408)871-1072 fax www.metroarchitects.com The plans, ideas and design on this drawing are the property of the designer,divised solely for this contract. Plans shall not be used, in whole or in part, for any purpose for which they were not intended without the written permission of METRO DESIGN GROUP. Oc RESIDENCE 26 LOS APN# PROJECT COREY ALPINE GATOS, 529-37-042 AVE NAME CA 95030 REVISIONS /2 PC2 1-17-17 D.Z. PROPOSED EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS RIGHT SIDE ELEVATION, NW DATE : 1 -17 -17 SCALE : 1/4" = 1'-0" DRAWN BY : DZ CHECKED BY : TS ARCHITECT : TOM SLOAN PROJECT NO : 16621 SHEET NUMBER A-4.1 Corey PC2 6-26-17.pin / G— J .�f TOP OF ROOF = 417'-31/2" (+ 13'-91/11) T.P. = 415'-10" (+ 12'-4") - r\ V- - - �.J ; Il l 1 T.W. = 415'-4" II 11 TI It INDICATES 30' VERTICAL DISTANCE FROM THE PROPOSED GRADE AT WALL FACE H.P. = 419'-51/2" INDICATES 30' VERTICAL DISTANCE FROM THE EXISTING GRADE AT WALL FACE rl 11 �0 :'-i L I II 1 1 1 I I If i1� >h1l Ij �IL r ;S GPI 1( (ram ( UPPER FLOOR SUBFLOOR = 403'-6" (± 0'-0") EXTERIOR FINISHES 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 ROOF: ROOF: ROOF FASCIA: EXTERIOR WALLS AND GARAGE DOOR: EXTERIOR WALLS: EXTERIOR WALLS: EXTERIOR WALLS: WINDOWS & EXTERIOR DOORS: ENTRY DOOR: GUARDRAIL: RETAINING WALLS, PLANTERS: DRIVEWAY, WALKWAYS AND PATIOS PERMEABLE PAVERS: 11 I IL I (� �1 11 / �Jl (r r 1'� 11 111 IJ 1J 1 )1 1 � 7 r3 o Z PROPOSED LEFT SIDE ELEVATION: SOUTHEAST SCALE : 1/4" = 1'-0" CLASS 'A' GAF 'EVERGUARD ® TPO' 60 MIL SINGLE PLY - MANSARD COLOR GREEN ROOF SYSTEM: EXTENSIVE GARDEN ROOF BY "HYDROTECH USA" CUSTOM 24 GA. PRE -PAINTED 'GALVALUME' METAL - DARK BRONZE COLOR GREY WOOD SIDING - 8" EXPOSURE 'COOPER STONE' - CHESTNUT LEDGESTONE - NATURAL THIN STONE VENEER ALUMINUM CLAD 'DARK BRONZE' ANODIZED ALUMINUM 'KALWALL' - WALL SYSTEM TRANSLUCENT PANELS ALUMINUM WOOD CLAD 'DARK BRONZE' ANODIZED ALUMINUM CUSTOM STEEL DOOR 'DARK BRONZE' COLOR STEEL - 'DARK BRONZE' COLOR AND SAFETY GLASS POURED IN PLACE CONCRETE GREY COLOR ECO-FRIENDLY 'PERMEABLE MISSION PAVEMENT' - PREMIUM PETALUMA COLOR BY 'BASALITE' -7 L-2 y 1 i". -,., r 1 I/ L--; I J -7�� < / -7 c "> `—J INDICATES EXISTING GRADE AT THE FACE OF THE WALL INDICATES PROPOSED FINISHED GRADE AT THE FACE OF THE WALL I r< J ) ` 1, r— H.P. = 416'-10" T.P.= 414'-10" (+ 11'-4") 1 7 ,> v UPPER FLOOR FLOOR SUBFLOOR = 405'-10" (+ 2'-4") GARAGE F.SLAB = 395'-10" (— 7'-8") > rl <` �/I / L, r 1 ) I V AC PAD = 389'-8" ^\ -I �J r„Th (- 13140") I LJ a a H.P. = 4171-21/2" — MASTER BEDROOM INDICATES 30' VERTICAL DISTANCE FROM THE EXISTING GRADE AT WALL FACE J, / H.P. = 416'-11" L-- ) i I • \' 1 I E.P. = 385'-6" INDICATES EXISTING GRADE TO REMAIN AT THE FACE OF THE WALL J ■■I ❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑ 1❑❑❑❑❑❑❑ 111,DEEEDD 1❑❑❑❑❑❑❑ 1111LL❑❑ E.P. = 388'-8" s TOP OF ROOF = 417-21/2" (+ 13'-81/2") T.P.= 415'-6" (+ 12'-0") T.P.= 414'-10" (+ 11'-4") INDICATES 30' VERTICAL DISTANCE FROM THE PROPOSED GRADE AT WALL FACE -7 INDICATES EXISTING GRADE TO REMAIN AT THE FACE OF THE WALL INDICATES EXISTING GRADE AT THE FACE OF THE WALL INDICATES PROPOSED FINISHED GRADE AT THE FACE OF THE WALL — H.P. = 419'-4" —J —J _J \,, UPPER FLOOR SUBFLOOR — 405'-10" (+ 2'-4") UPPER FLOOR SUBFLOOR = 403'-6" (± 0'-0") TOP OF ROOF = 417'-2" T.P. = 415'-10" ' (+ 12'-4") INDICATES EXISTING GRADE TO REMAIN AT THE FACE OF THE WALL 11 T.W. = 415'-4" UPPER FLOOR SUBFLOOR = 403'-6" (± 0'—O") LOWER FLOOR 0 F. SLAB = 393'-6" (-10'-0") PROPOSED REAR ELEVATION: SOUTHWEST SCALE : 1/4" = 1'-0" METRO DESIGN GROUP ARCHITECTURE• PLANNING• INTERIORS 1475 S BASCOM AVE SUITE 208 CAMPBELL, CA 95008 (408)871-1071 phone (408)871-1072 fax www.metroarchitects.com The plans, ideas and design on this drawing are the property of the designer,divised solely for this contract. Plans shall not be used, in whole or in part, for any purpose for which they were not intended without the written permission of METRO DESIGN GROUP. Oc RESIDENCE 26 LOS APN# PROJECT COREY ALPINE GATOS, 529-37-042 AVE NAME CA 95030 REVISIONS A PC2 1-17-17 D.Z. LEFT SIDE ELEVATION, SE REAR ELEVATION, SW DATE : 1 -17 -17 SCALE : DRAWN BY : CHECKED BY : TS ARCHITECT : TOM SLOAN PROJECT NO : 16621 SHEET NUMBER A-4.2 Corey PC2 6-26-17.pin H.P. = 416'-11" T.P.= 414'-10" (+ 11'-4") UPPER FLOOR SUBFLOOR = 405'-10" (+ 2'-4") GARAGE F.SLAB = 395'-10" (- 7'-8") INDICATES 30' VERTICAL DISTANCE FROM THE EXISTING GRADE INDICATES 30' VERTICAL DISTANCE FROM THE EXISTING OR FINISHED GRADE , WHICHEVER IS LOWER-TYP. U.N.O. INDICATES 30' VERTICAL DISTANCE FROM THE PROPOSED GRADE INDICATES 389'-6" ELEVATION TOPO LINE -ENCLOSED AREA DOES NOT EXTEND MORE THAN 4'-0" ABOVE EXISTING GRADE E.P. = 388'-8" INDICATES EXISTING GRADE BEYOND TO REMAIN AT THE FACE OF THE WALL N 1 % SLOPE FAMILY ROOM INDICATES 30' VERTICAL DISTANCE FROM THE EXISTING GRADE AT STRUCTURE LOCATED ABOVE CELLAR / / — T.W. = 415'-4" / LIGHT WELL BEDROOM BAS.EMENT� CELLAR HALL BATH WATER FEATURE y .%4 ' SECTION B-B SCALE : 1/4" = 1'-0" 00 N H.P. = 416'-11" T.P.= 414'-10" (+ 111-4") UPPER FLOOR SUBFLOOR = 405'-10" — Gb (+ 2'-4") GARAGE F.SLAB = 395'-10" (- 7'-8") (P) GRADE =394.00' AC PAD = 389'-8" (- 13'-10") / /x** INDICATES EXISTING GRADE INDICATES PROPOSED FINISHED GRADE INDICATES EXISTING GRADE TO REMAIN / / • • • TOP OF ROOF = 417'-31/2" (+ 13'-9112") UPPER FLOOR — SUBFLOOR = 403'-6" (± 0'-0") BUILDING SETBACK AREA / 7 / / LOWER FLOOR -0— F. SLAB = 393'-6" (-10'-0") INDICATES 30' VERTICAL DISTANCE FROM THE PROPOSED GRADE 1 % SLOPE BEDROOM IRON GRATE AC UNIT HALL CELLAR BATH GARAGE / / n BASEMENT Q CELLAR / \ N INDICATES 30' VERTICAL DISTANCE FROM THE EXISTING GRADE INDICATES 30' VERTICAL DISTANCE FROM THE EXISTING OR FINISHED GRADE , WHICHEVER IS LOWER-TYP. U.N.O. INDICATES 30' VERTICAL DISTANCE FROM THE EXISTING GRADE AT STRUCTURE LOCATED ABOVE CELLAR INDICATES 400'-10" ELEVATION TOPO LINE - ENCLOSED AREA DOES NOT EXTEND MORE THAN 4'-0" ABOVE EXISTING GRADE H.P. = 417'-21/2" L INDICATES 30' VERTICAL DISTANCE FROM THE EXISTING GRADE AT STRUCTURE LOCATED ABOVE CELLAR CELLAR INDICATES 409'-6" ELEVATION TOPO LINE - ENCLOSED AREA DOES NOT EXTEND MORE THAN 4'-0" ABOVE EXISTING GRADE ." s i-.-- i .aALL, ..JI/L,.,0‘61-4.111.4�._ i1.Ill . �_ io-N•. .i - J MASTER BEDROOM / BASEMENT CELLAR O 1-1 MASTER CLOSET 7-▪ 1 / (P) GRADE =388.67' INDICATES EXISTING GRADE TO REMAIN • DRILLED CONCRETE PIER PER STRUCTURAL ENG'S PLANS. 'ECOSHIELD-E10' GEOMEMBRANE 0/ECOLINE-S LIQUID APPLIED MEMBRANE BETWEEN PIERS CONCRETE RETAINING WALL - TYP. SUBBASE PER SOIL ENG'S RECOMMENDATION - TYP. 4" DIA PERFORATED PVC SUBDRAIN PIPE - TYP. INDICATES EXISTING GRADE INDICATES PROPOSED GRADE SECTION A -A SCALE : 1/4" = 1'-0" BUILDING SETBACK AREA TOP OF ROOF = 415'-6" (+ 12'-0") T.P.= 413'-6" (+ 10'-0") UPPER FLOOR SUBFLOOR = 403'-6" (± 0'-0") METROilA DESIGN GROUP ARCHITECTURE• PLANNING• INTERIORS 1475 S BASCOM AVE SUITE 208 CAMPBELL, CA 95008 (408)871-1071 phone (408)871-1072 fax www.metroarchitects.com The plans, ideas and design on this drawing are the property of the designer,divised solely for this contract. Plans shall not be used, in whole or in part, for any purpose for which they were not intended without the written permission of METRO DESIGN GROUP. PROJECT NAME COREY RESIDENCE 26 ALPINE AVE LOS GATOS, CA 95030 APN# 529-37-042 REVISIONS n PC1 10-27-16 D.Z. AZ PC2 1-17-17 D.Z. A PC2 6-26-17 D.Z. PROPOSED SECTIONS SECTION 'A' SECTION 'B' DATE : 1 -17 -17 SCALE : 1/4" = 1'-0" DRAWN BY : TS CHECKED BY : TS ARCHITECT : TOM SLOAN PROJECT NO : 16621 SHEET NUMBER A-5.O Corey PC2 6-26-17.pin N H.P. = 416'-11" T.P.= 414'-10" (+ 11'-4") UPPER FLOOR SUBFLOOR = 405'-10" (+ 2'-4") GARAGE F.SLAB = 395'-10" (- 7'-8") INDICATES 389'-6" ELEVATION TOPO LINE -ENCLOSED AREA DOES NOT EXTEND MORE THAN 4'-0" ABOVE EXISTING GRADE E.P. = 388'-8" INDICATES EXISTING GRADE BEYOND TO REMAIN AT THE FACE OF THE WALL INDICATES 30' VERTICAL DISTANCE FROM THE EXISTING GRADE INDICATES 30' VERTICAL DISTANCE FROM THE EXISTING OR FINISHED GRADE , WHICHEVER IS LOWER-TYP. U.N.O. INDICATES 30' VERTICAL DISTANCE FROM THE PROPOSED GRADE CELLAR 1 % SLOPE / INDICATES 30' VERTICAL DISTANCE FROM THE EXISTING GRADE AT STRUCTURE LOCATED ABOVE CELLAR INDICATES EXISTING GRADE INDICATES PROPOSED GRADE INDICATES EXISTING GRADE TO REMAIN ,-- T.W.= 415'-4" TOP OF ROOF = 415'-6" (+ 12'-0") T.P. = 413'-6" (+ 10'-0") UPPER FLOOR SUBFLOOR = 403'-6" (± 0'-0") LOWER FLOOR 0 F. SLAB = 393'-6" (-10'-0") SECTION C-C SCALE : 1/4" = 1'-0" ARCHITECTURE- 1475 S CAMPBELL, (408)871-1071 (408)871-1072 www.metroarchitects.com INTERIORS 208 METROA. DESIGN GROUP PLANNING• BASCOM AVE SUITE CA 95008 phone fax The plans, ideas and design on this drawing are the property of the designer,divised solely for this contract. Plans shall not be used, in whole or in part, for any purpose for which they were not intended without the written permission of METRO DESIGN GROUP. Oc RESIDENCE 26 LOS APN# PROJECT COREY ALPINE GATOS, 529-37-042 AVE NAME CA 95030 REVISIONS A PC2 1-17-17 D.Z. PROPOSED SECTIONS SECTION 'C' DATE : 1 -17 -17 SCALE : 1/4" = 1'-0" DRAWN BY : TS CHECKED BY : TS ARCHITECT : TOM SLOAN PROJECT NO : 16621 SHEET NUMBER A-5.1 r 0 19 1 720 --- 53 -53 f 57 A jt5 7-39 33 41 \•\\\ 24 22 -21 to/ f26 11 TREE SURVEY 26 ALPINE DRIVE TOWN OF LOS GATOS SANTA CLARA COUNTY - CALIFORNIA THIS PRELIMINARY TREE SURVEY WAS PREPARED BY GARETH JONES, A CERTIFIED ARBORIST #WE-8379A IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS SET DOWN IN 'TOWN OF LOS GATOS TREE PRESERVATION STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS'AND IS PART OF THE 'PRELIMINARYARBORISTS REPORT FOR 26 ALPINE DRIVE'AND SHOULD BE USED AS A PART OF THE ENTIRE REPORT. LOCATIONS OF MOST TREES WERE TAKEN FROM THE DRAWING 'TOPOGRAPHIC AND BOUNDARY SURVEY, July 2016 ' BY WESTFALL ENGINEERING. CANOPIES WERE ESTIMATED BY SIGHT AND USING A LASER DISTANCE METER. ALL DBH'S WERE DERIVED FROM HAND MEASURED CIRCUMFERENCES TAKEN BY THE ARBORIST. GRAPHIC SCALE 20 0 10 20 40 ------------ /-38 50`����,\ e 23 25 -- ------------ 29 28 0------- 1 ( IN FEET) 1 inch = 20ft. '15 80 J 0 0 0 J J SHEET'. TS O . 1 ORIG.DWG, 7-10-2016 REV.DWG: Pie 0 TREE PROTECTION PLAN LEGEND: STANDARD TREE PROTECTION ZONE (1" Dia =1' TPZ Rad.) 3 X DBH & 5X DBH ENCROACHMENT LIMITS. 0 SUGGESTED TREE PROTECTION ZONE FENCING SUGGESTED TREE PROTECTION ZONE - APPROXIMATE EDGE OF CANOPY SUGGEST REMOVE EXISTING TREE ='GRAPHIC SCALE 20 ( IN FEET) 1 inch = 20ft. / / 4 756 5 40 80 13 ; PROTECTION PLAN WAS PREPARED BY GARETH JONES, % A CERTIFIED ARBORIST #WE-8379A IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS SET DOWN IN 'TOWN OF LOS GATOS -- TREE PRESERVATION STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS'AND IS PART OF THE 'PRELIMINARY ARBORISTS REPORT FOR 26 ALPINE DRIVE' AND SHOULD BE USED AS A PART OF THE ENTIRE REPORT. LOCATIONS OF MOST TREES WERE TAKEN FROM THE DRAWING 'TOPOGRAPHIC AND BOUNDARY SURVEY, July 2016 ' BY WESTFALL ENGINEERING. CANOPIES WERE ESTIMATED BY SIGHT AND USING A LASER DISTANCE METER. ALL DBH'S WERE DERIVED FROM HAND MEASURED CIRCUMFERENCES TAKEN BY THE ARBORIST. CHANGES PER ARB REVIEW LETTER 0 O z SHEET'. T P-O.1 ORIG.OWG'. 7-10-2016 REV.DWG: 1-16-2017 JOB:_ Corey PC2 6-26-17.pin ud W lawny d' NOTE: TREE SIZES ON SHEET T-1: 30'-1/2! 00- 1 10"OA INDICATES PROPERTY LINE (TYP.) 406.25 TOPOGRAPHIC AND BOUNDARY SURVEY HAVE BEEN MEASURED AT THE BASE OF THE TREES. 45 10"BAY TREE SIZES ON SHEET A-1.0 & L-1.0: ARE CONSISTENT WITH THE ARBORIST REPORT : DIAMETER AT BREAST HEIGHT IN INCHES IS THE DIAMETER OF THE TRUNK MEASURED AT 4.5 FEET ABOVE THE GROUND LEVEL IN INCHES, AS REQUIRED. INDICATES EXISTING TREE TO REMAIN, TYP. INDICATES TREE PROTECTION FENCING PER TOWN OF LOS GATOS GENERAL TREE PROTECTION DIRECTIONS, TYP. INDICATES PROPOSED RESIDENCE, TYP. M 0 381.92 Lip 01 / r 9 26"OAK �pN 5°OF3g° 3$0� 381.30 p�6 49 10" BUCKEYE 382.44 382.06 35 INDICATES EXISTING TREE TO BE REMOVED, TYP. 418 A16 N 43°30'00" E 26.0 72_e� 6"PRUNU$__ _ 34 11"OAK 95,. ✓'i9S 74 35 7" BUCKEYE 37 8" BAY ; ' 39 15"BAY 381.17 3$� 41 14"BAY 33 24"OAK 32 8"BAY 38 7"BAY 6 /500 , 12 18"IAK / ti� 06> ff �O ^33 /7 / 0' 7 7 C� 531 • ^- 26 12" BAY / t 21 12"OAK 0�` 3gti 34L• Qlill- 23 7"OAK Gk-22 1 AK/ 24 6"OAK 25 24"OAK 386.45 6"PRUNUS 404.74 7 19 / 46 ' 331 0` ,46 / / Ro- / 13 45"EUC ♦ ♦ p \ ‘.1). ♦ 14 12"OAK ♦ 53` �� 396.17 �1�♦ /3 15 15"OAK/♦ 18 DBL 14"OAK S r 20 11"BAY 385.24/ / / / ' i 16 4"BAY 17 14"OAK VI53 tt Q' / 22'BAY / (0 / °0t / j nj� ���1 // 52 13"OAK i / gti'6g i 29 28 10"Bt,CKEYE i / / / a5/ f/ / i g0 .- 18"OAK' rB i / ,\9 AK 101 BPNj // / / • 00/ 0 . . 50 24" BUCKEYE 7 382.56 / 30 27 g 30 12"0 1 5 / 6b" / 35y. 51 18"OAK 7 / 6 Ct's TREE PLAN LEGEND PROPERTY LINE (E) GRADE MINOR CONTOUR LINE (E) GRADE MAJOR CONTOUR LINE PROPOSED GRADE CONTOUR LINE EXISTING FENCE TO REMAIN EXISTING FENCE TO BE REMOVED PROPOSED FENCE (E) DRIVEWAY TO BE RESURFACED NEW GAS LINE NEW WATER LINE NEW ELECTRIC LINE JOINT TRENCH NEW SANITARY SEWER LINE 0 / PROPOSED RESIDENCE PROPOSED PERMEABLE PAVERS AT DRIVEWAY PROPOSED HARDSCAPE EXISTING TREE TO REMAIN TREE PROTECTION FENCING 383.84 R R R R R R R 3(6° 54 SNAG 56 12" BUCKEYE 50 3$� 55 13"OAK 0 0 a) a 0 a a) a) 1 Quercus agrifolia Y 2 Eucalyptus globulus Y 3 Quercus agrifolia Y 4 Quercus agrifolia Y /5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Not Used Quercus agrifolia H u_ a) fU 0 Retain & Protect Y 25 Retain & Protect Y 55 Retain & Protect Y 45 Retain & Protect Y 45 Y Retain & Protect Y 45 Acacia melanoxylon Y Remove Quercus agrifolia Y Quercus agrifolia Y Y 30 Retain & Protect Y 45 Retain & Protect Y 45 Quercus agrifolia Y Remove Prunus spp. Y Remove Quercus agrifolia Y Remove Eucalyptus globulus N Quercus agrifolia N Quercus agrifolia Umbellularia californica N 25 Y 20 Y 30 Retain & Protect Y 60 Retain & Protect Y 45 Retain & Protect Y 50 Retain & Protect Y 20 17 Quercus lobata N Retain & Protect Y 18 Quercus agrifolia N Retain & Protect Y 19 Prunus spp. N Retain & Protect 20 Umbellularia californica N Retain & Protect Y 21 Quercus lobata 22 Quercus agrifolia Y Retain & Protect Y H u- ca SC cc a7 a) 0 a) a U) r 0 CC 35 10 1 87 75 35 32 5 71 75 40 18 1 85 85 30 18 1 85 85 45 26 1 81 85 30 30 40 30 5 30 40 30 35 12 4 69 35 30 1 88 85 26 1 79 56 14 1 66 45 6 4 73 85 18 1 83 80 45 5 86 85 12 1 91 90 15 1 89 90 50 40 14 1 87 85 35 30 14 1 83 90 35 25 11 2 87 75 45 35 12 1 90 90 Y Retain & Protect Y 50 30 13 1 90 90 85 50 90 90 50 85 75 85 95 85 90 85 85 75 90 75 65 65 85 90 90 90 80 85 85 90 85 75 65 85 85 90 90 90 85 0 85 80 85 65 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 67 90 93 90 95 95 88 90 53 90 87 90 75 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 55 55 95 95 95 95 90 85 20 50 85 85 85 50 90 90 90 90 90 90 254 113 707 531 154 28 254 1353 113 177 133 45.5 45.5 45.5 45.5 45.5 77 45.5 36.4 45.5 45.5 45.5 $3,569 $28,636 $11,562 $11,562 $24,124 $32,117 $24,124 $6,994 $2,177 $11,562 $49,200 $5,139 $8,029 $11,853 $6,994 $2,177 $7,318 $8,709 $6,031 $1,910 $1,730 $8,000 $8,000 $710 $23,700 $3,670 $250 $7,500 $3,170 $3,790 $5,800 $8,400 $4,700 $4,010 $6,300 $4,400 23 Quercus agrifolia N Retain & Protect Y 25 15 7 1 88 85 85 90 90 90 88 90 85 90 38 45.5 $1,749 $1,220 24 Quercus agrifolia N Retain & Protect Y 20 15 6 1 85 90 80 85 85 85 87 90 85 85 28 45.5 $1,285 $850 25 Quercus lobata N Retain & Protect Y 50 55 24 1 89 90 85 90 90 90 93 90 95 95 452 77 $34,834 $26,000 26 Umbellularia californica Y Retain & Protect Y 25 30 12 2 72 50 40 90 90 90 47 90 25 25 113 77 $8,709 $2,050 27 Quercus agrifolia N Retain & Protect Y 45 45 18 1 80 85 80 65 75 85 73 85 85 50 254 45.5 $11,5621 $6,100 28 Aesculus californica N Retain & Protect Y 25 15 10 2 84 90 70 70 85 90 87 90 85 85 79 45.5 $3,569 $1,820 30 Quercus agrifolia N Retain & Protect Y 40 30 12 1 88 85 85 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 113 45.5 $5,139 $3,660 31 Not Used 32 Umbellularia californica Y Remove Y 35 20 8 2 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 50 77, $3,870 $2,190 34 Quercus agrifolia Y Remove Y 25 15 11 1 88 85 85 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 95 45.51 $4,318 $3,080 35 Aesculus californica Y Remove Y 15 10 7 2 77 80 45 65 85 90 90 90 90 90 38 45.5 $1,749 $850 36 Quercus agrifolia Y Remove Y 38 151 10 1 89 85 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 79 45.5 $3,569 $2,570 37 Umbellularia californica Y Remove Y 30 10 8 2 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 50 77 $3,8701 $2,190 39 Aesculus californica N Retain & Protect Y 40 30 15 2 90 95 85 85 90 90 92 90 95 90 177 45.5 $8,029 $4,640 40 Aesculus californica N Retain & Protect Y 25 10 8 2 87 90 75 90 90 90 77 90 50 90 50 45.5 $2,284 $1,070 41 Umbellularia californica N Retain & Protect Y 40 25 14 2 75 85 80 65 65 80 87 90 75 95 154 77 $11,853 $5,390 42 Quercus agrifolia N Retain & Protect Y 35 20 8 1 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 50 45.5 $2,284 $1,660 44 Quercus agrifolia N Retain & Protect Y 40 20 9 1 89 90 85 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 64 45.5 $2,891 $2,080 45 Umbellular a californica N Retain & Protect Y 35 15 10 2 83 85 75 85 85 85 90 90 90 90 79 77 $6,048 $3,160 46 Quercus agrifolia N Retain & Protect Y 40 30 11 93 85 95 95 95 95 90 90 90 90 95 45.5 $4,318 $3,250 47 48 Quercus agrifolia N Retain & Protect Y Prunus spp. N Retain & Protect N 45 25 30 10 11 10 4 95 95 72 85 95 80 95 80 95 65 95 90 90 65 55 90 90 25 90 50 95 79 45.5 77 $4,318 $6,048 $3,320 $720 49 Aesculus californica N Retain & Protect Y 20 35 10 2 85 85 85 85 85 85 90 90 90 90 79 45.5 $3,569 $1,910 50 30 35 24 2 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 452 45.5 $20,555 $11,700 51 35 40 18 78 60 80 90 80 90 90 90 95 85 254 77 52 Quercus agrifolia N Retain & Protect Y 35 35 13 89 90 95 90 85 90 93 90 95 95 133 45.5 $6,031 $4,510 53 Umbellularia californica N Retain & Protect Y 35 30 22 2 85 80 85 85 85 90 90 90 95 85 380 77 $29,271 54 55 56 57 Quercus lobata (Snag) N Retain & Protect Y Aesculus californica N Retain & Protect Y Umbellularia californica Y Remove 25 40 25 30 20 35 30 24 13 12 20 2 85 85 85 85 82 85 85_ 85 85 65 85 75 85 85 85 0 72 90 85 90 90 85 90 90 90 83 90 75 90 90 75 50 90 90 85 452 133 113 314 77 45.5 45.5 77 $34,834 $6,031 $5,139 $24,191 $4,150 $2,750 $11,600 58 35 6 4 45 35 15 35 55 65 73 90 65 65 28 SEE ARBORIST REPORT FOR MORE INFORMATION 45.5 $130 liA METRO DESIGN GROUP ARCHITECTURE- PLANNING- INTERIORS 1475 S BASCOM AVE SUITE 208 CAMPBELL, CA 95008 (408)871-1071 phone (408)871-1072 fax The plans, ideas and design on this drawing are the property of the designer,divised solely for this contract. Plans shall not be used, in whole or in part, for any purpose for which they were not intended without the written permission of METRO DESIGN GROUP. RESIDENCE 26 LOS APN# PROJECT COREY ALPINE GATOS, 529-37-042 AVE NAME CA 95030 REVISIONS A\ PC2 6-06-17 T.S. TREE PLAN DATE : 1 -17 -17 DRAWN BY : DZ CHECKED BY : TS ARCHITECT : TOM SLOAN PROJECT NO : 16621 SHEET NUMBER Lm1.0