Loading...
Consulting Architect Presentation Small Town Service ~ Community Stewardship ~ Future Focus Review Role of Consulting Architect Los Gatos Town Council April 21, 2014 Small Town Service ~ Community Stewardship ~ Future Focus BACKGROUND Review requested by two Councilmembers • Added to 2014-16 Strategic Goals • Purpose of Study Session • Provide background information and history – Obtain Council direction on: – •Any additional information needed •Potential changes for future consideration Small Town Service ~ Community Stewardship ~ Future Focus History 2000 –Concerns raised about PC design review • Efficiency (long meetings, backlogs, re-hearings) – Effectiveness (lack of professional input) – Pilot launched in 2002 • Evaluation of Pilot • Positive feedback from applicants, residents, PC – Refocusing of PC time and efforts – Backlog eliminated – Architectural Consultant used ever since • Small Town Service ~ Community Stewardship ~ Future Focus COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2002-25 1.Architectural Consultant reviews plans: Recommendations included in staff report • Revised plans incorporate recommendations • 2.PC makes findings to modify recommendations Based on erroneous information • Mistakes of facts • Compelling evidence of privacy or n-hood impact • 3.PC respects professional expertise of Architect 4.PC avoids continuing projects for revised plans Small Town Service ~ Community Stewardship ~ Future Focus SELECTION OF ARCHITECT Works as “extension of staff” under CDD • Competitive process in 2001-02 • Larry Cannon as primary – Mark Srebnikas secondary – Competitive process in 2011-12 • Larry Cannon as primary – RMM Design Group as secondary – Applicants pay costs except for Town projects • Small Town Service ~ Community Stewardship ~ Future Focus COUNCIL ISSUES Public review of design alternatives • All designs are part of project file until acted upon – PC receives recommended changes and final plans – Applicants may submit preferred alternatives to PC – Public may submit requested alternatives to PC – Clarify or strengthen Resolution Section A – Increase or further limit PC design discretion • Add more PC findings allowing design modifications – Reiterate required findings for design modifications – Memorialize desired changes in Resolution Section B – Note: Some architectural support needed by staff • Small Town Service ~ Community Stewardship ~ Future Focus COUNCIL DIRECTION No direction (Maintain status quo) • Request additional information • Survey of municipal best practices for design review – Survey Town participants on design review process – Modify Resolution 2002-25 • Regarding design review alternatives (Section A) – Regarding PC design review discretion (Section B) – Other sections – Rescind Resolution 2002-25 • Small Town Service ~ Community Stewardship ~ Future Focus