Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Attachment 1
ioF TOWN OF LOS GATOS PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT )tT�' Meeting Date: March 13, 2013 PREPARED BY: Jennifer L. Savage, Associate Planner jsavage@losgatosea.gov APPLICATION NO: Planned Development Application PD -11 -006 Negative Declaration ND -11 -008 Architecture & Site Application S -12 -098 ITEM NO: 2 LOCATION: 219 Bean Avenue (south side of Bean Avenue, between Tait Avenue and Victory Lane) APPLICANT/ CONTACT PERSON: Jeffrey T. Berg, AIA /Steinberg Architects PROPERTY OWNER: Roman Catholic Bishop of San Jose APPLICATION SUMMARY: Requesting approval for rezoning from R -11) & C -2 to R -1D:PD to allow for the construction of a new Jr. High School, modify existing school operations, and continue church services and activities. No significant environmental impacts have been identified as a result of this project and a Mitigated Negative Declaration is recommended. APNs 510 -44 -083, 510 -44 -084, & 510 -44 -028. RECOMMENDATION PROJECT DATA: DEEMED COMPLETE: February 20, 2013 FINAL DATE TO TAKE ACTION: August 20, 2013 Approve, subject to conditions. General Plan Designation: Zoning Designation: Applicable Plans & Standards: Parcel Size: Surrounding Area: Medium Density Residential, 5 - 12 dwelling units /acre R -11) - Single- Family Residential, Downtown & C -2 - Central Business District General Plan; Central Los Gatos Redevelopment Plan 4.18 acres ArCACHMMT 1 Existing Land Use General Plan I Zoning North Residential Medium Density Residential R -11) East Commercial Central Business District C -2 South Residential, Commercial, & Public Parking Lot Medium Density Residential & Central Business District R-11) & C -2 West Residential Medium Density Residential 1k-1D ArCACHMMT 1 Planning Commission Staff Report - Page 2 219 Bean Avenue /PD- 11- 006/ND- 11- 008/5 -12 -098 March 13, 2013 CEQA: It has been determined that this project will not have a significant impact on the environment and a Mitigated Negative Declaration is recommended. FINDINGS: ® That the project will not have a significant impact on the environment and a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. • That the Zone Change (Planned Development) is consistent with the General Plan. • That the project is consistent with the Redevelopment Plan for the Central Los Gatos Redevelopment Project. CONSIDERATIONS: ® As required by Section 29.20.150 of the Town Code for granting approval of an Architecture and Site application. ACTION: 1. Forward a recommendation regarding Planned Development Application PD -11 -006 and Architecture and Site Application 5 -12 -098 to the Town Council. 2. Forw and a recommendation regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Plan to the Town Council. EXHIBITS: Received under separate cover 1. Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration Received with this report 2. Location Map 3. Findings and Considerations 4. Recommended Conditions of Approval for Architecture and Site 5 -12 -098 (14 pages) 5. Mitigation Monitoring Plan (seven pages) 6. Letter of Justification (20 pages), received January 15, 2013 7. Justification for Height Exception (six pages), received September 10, 2012 8. Architectural Consultant Report (six pages), received January 2, 2013 9. Arborist Reports (48 pages), received May 1, 2012; October 17, 2012; and January 10, 2013 10. Story Pole Board (one page), received February 15, 2013 11, Planned Development Ordinance (25 pages) with Rezone Exhibit (one page), Applicant's Proposal (20 pages), and Development Plans (25 pages) Planning Commission Staff Report - Page 3 219 Bean Avenue /PD- 11- 006/ND- 11- 008/5 -12 -098 March 13, 2013 ACKGROUND: In April 1985, Los Gatos approved a Conditional Use Permit (CUP), Architecture and Site (A &S) application, and Subdivision application to operate an existing church, elementary school, rectory, and uses accessory to the operation of the church and school. The approval included construction of new multi - purpose and religious education buildings, a new garage and parking facilities, and demolition of an existing garage. Subsequent to these approvals, St. Mary's has received numerous A &S approvals for various modifications to the site. The existing CUP allows the operation of a church with 654 seats, a school with a maximum of 265 students in grades one through eight, a rectory, a maximum of 20 employees, and uses accessory to the operation of the church and school. It is important to note that St. Mary's School and Parish is currently operating with 296 students and has operated with as many as 325 students since the 1999/2000 academic school year. If the deciding body finds merit with the subject proposal, the number of students will not change from the number of students that has existed for more than 10 years. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: A. Project Summary, The proposed project includes a Planned Development application and an Architecture and Site Application. The applicant is proposing a Planned Development to rezone the subject sites from R -11) & C -2 to R- 1D:PD, construction of a new Jr. High School, modification of existing school operations, and continued chur ch services and activities, including the rectory. The applicant is proposing an A &S application to demolish the existing building located at 59 Victory Lane (existing junior high school), construct a new junior high school building, demolish the existing covered eating area, construct a new covered eating area, and make minor modifications to the lower school to connect it to the new junior high school building, which is included as part of the PD application. B. Location and Surrounding Neighborhood The project site is located at 219 Bean Avenue, on the south side of Bean Avenue, between Tait Avenue and Victory Lane. The property includes the following addresses: 30 Lyndon Avenue, 49 Victory Lane, 59 Victory Lane, 59A, B, and C Victory Lane, 213 Bean Avenue, 215 Bean Avenue, and 229 Bean Avenue. There are residential uses to the north, west, and south of the property; commercial uses are located to the south and east. There is also a public parking lot to the south. Planning Commission Staff Report - Page 4 219 Bean Avenue /PD- 11- 006/ND- 11- 008/S -12 -098 March 13, 2013 C. Zoning Compliance The zoning designations, currently R -ID & C -2 and proposed R -ID, allow schools and churches subject to the approval of a Conditional Use Permit or as allowed by a Planned Development (PD). Town Code allows a PD overlay on sites 40,000 square feet or greater. ANALYSIS: A. Planned Development Town Code states that the purpose of a PD is to provide for alternative uses and developments that are more consistent with site characteristics, to create an optimum quantity and use of open space, and to encourage good design. The applicant is proposing to rezone from R -1D and C -2 to R- 1D:PD, modify operations (outlined below), and new construction (outlined below). The applicant would continue operating the church with a maximum seating of 654, the school, rectory and uses accessory to the operation of the church and school. The Planned Development application would serve as a Master Plan for St. Mary's Church and School. Since the use encompasses three separate parcels, a performance standard has been included to merge the properties. Through the Planned Development application, the applicant is proposing the following operational changes: • increase the number of students from 265 to 315; • increase the number of staff from 20 to 36; and • increase the class grades from one through eight to kindergarten through eight, Through the Planned Development application, the applicant is proposing the following construction: ® demolish the existing junior high school; constructing a new junior high school; ® demolish the existing covered eating area; ® construct a new covered eating area; ® remodel and addition to the lower school; ® demolish the teen center; and ® construct a new rectory. The Planned Development application incorporates the zone change, lot merger, Master Plan, and a height exception request as discussed below. The Planned Development Planning Commission Staff Report - Page 5 219 Bean Avenue /PD- 11- 006/ND- 11- 008/5 -12 -098 March 13, 2013 Ordinance incorporates the applicable conditions of the existing CUP and defines the operation of the uses through the performance standards and, therefore, the existing CUP is no longer required. B. Exceptions Through the PD process, the applicant is requesting the exceptions noted below and provides the justification for the exceptions in Exhibits 6 & 7. *Existing height of 59 Victory Lane is 16 feet; of the church is 35'- 10" not counting the spire, Fence Height Exception. The existing fence along the southern property line separates the lower school playground from the public parking lot and is less than six feet in height. The applicant is requesting a fence height exception to construct the walls over six feet. The proposed walls along the south and east property lines are six feet to eight feet in height. The applicant explains that the site slopes downward as you travel south to north, especially along Victory Lane (Exhibit 6). The slope causes the need for the varying height of the proposed walls, from six feet to eight feet. The school is requesting the proposed height for security reasons because there are play areas adjacent to parking lots and Victory Lane. Due to the privacy concerns and the sloping site, staff finds the fence height exception request reasonable. Structure Height Exception. As you enter the campus from Bean Avenue and travel south towards the lower school the site slopes upwards. The height of the Junior High building at the north wall would be 34' -2 "; the height at the south wall would be 32' -6 ". The applicant is requesting a height exception to exceed the zone's 30 -foot height maximum by four feet two inches. The applicant provides justification for the structure height exception (Exhibit 7). The applicant's letter regarding the justification for height requests a 36' -8" height. However, the applicant is requesting a maximum height of only 34' -2 ". The justification includes the height of existing St. Mary's buildings and the location of the new building in relation to the commercial structures across Victory Lane. St. Mary's church is 35' -10" tall; the C -2 zoning district across Victory Lane allows a maximum height of 45 feet. The consulting architect found the request for a height exception was reasonable because, among other factors, the building would face an open space area and create a more desirable pedestrian circulation design relating to the lower school. The applicant explains Existing Proposed Permitted Fence Height 6 feet Varies; 6 to 8 feet 6 feet; 8 feet with approval Structure Height Varies* 34' -2" feet 30 feet *Existing height of 59 Victory Lane is 16 feet; of the church is 35'- 10" not counting the spire, Fence Height Exception. The existing fence along the southern property line separates the lower school playground from the public parking lot and is less than six feet in height. The applicant is requesting a fence height exception to construct the walls over six feet. The proposed walls along the south and east property lines are six feet to eight feet in height. The applicant explains that the site slopes downward as you travel south to north, especially along Victory Lane (Exhibit 6). The slope causes the need for the varying height of the proposed walls, from six feet to eight feet. The school is requesting the proposed height for security reasons because there are play areas adjacent to parking lots and Victory Lane. Due to the privacy concerns and the sloping site, staff finds the fence height exception request reasonable. Structure Height Exception. As you enter the campus from Bean Avenue and travel south towards the lower school the site slopes upwards. The height of the Junior High building at the north wall would be 34' -2 "; the height at the south wall would be 32' -6 ". The applicant is requesting a height exception to exceed the zone's 30 -foot height maximum by four feet two inches. The applicant provides justification for the structure height exception (Exhibit 7). The applicant's letter regarding the justification for height requests a 36' -8" height. However, the applicant is requesting a maximum height of only 34' -2 ". The justification includes the height of existing St. Mary's buildings and the location of the new building in relation to the commercial structures across Victory Lane. St. Mary's church is 35' -10" tall; the C -2 zoning district across Victory Lane allows a maximum height of 45 feet. The consulting architect found the request for a height exception was reasonable because, among other factors, the building would face an open space area and create a more desirable pedestrian circulation design relating to the lower school. The applicant explains Planning Commission Staff Report - Page 6 219 Bean Avenue /PD- 11- 006/ND- 11- 008/S -12 -098 March 13, 2013 that the building will be setback far from the residential neighborhood along Bean Avenue. The Planned Development application allows site development that is more consistent with site characteristics. Due to the architectural consultant's evaluation, the setback from the residential neighborhood, and the adjacent commercial zone, staff finds the height exception request reasonable. C. Parkin Prior to obtaining the 1985 CUP, the church use was nonconforming due to a lack of a CUP and nonconforming as to parking. Pursuant to Town Code, a use can continue as long as it provides parking to the maximum extent possible and does not intensify. The 1985 staff report for the existing CUP found that, although the number of parking spaces was nonconforming, the existing parking was adequate for the nonconforming church use because the church added parking to the maximum extent feasible (added 23 spaces) and did not intensify (maintained a maximum of 654 church seats). The proposed increase in students and staff can be accommodated with the previously approved number of spaces. The applicant has delineated how the black top area used for school play areas would be used for church parking (Sheet A3.0 of Development Plans, Exhibit C of Exhibit 11). The table below illustrates the required, provided, and approved number of spaces. The performance standards reference the applicant's letter of justification that explains that school activities occur at different times from church activities. *Church uses of more than 68 people shall not operate concurrenuy wim senow so that the uses together will not exceed the parking provided. This requirement is included in the Planned Development Ordinance performance standards. * *Includes one onsite space in the Parking Assessment District. One of the lots is located in the parking assessment district. This lot has one onsite parking space and six parking credits. As required by Town Code, the plans propose to maintain the one onsite parking space, which will be one of the 105 onsite parking spaces for St. Mary's School and Parish. Planning Commission Staff Report - Page 7 219 Bean Avenue /PD- I1- 006/ND- 11- 008/5 -12 -098 March 13, 2013 When the existing CUP was approved in 1985, the use had 82 parking spaces and proposed to add 23 more, for a total of 105 parking spaces. The applicant proposes 105 onsite parking spaces, which is consistent with the previous approval. In addition, the use has six parking spaces in the parking assessment district, for a total of 111 spaces. D. Traffic The proposal would not increase the number of trips that exist since the number of students, which the trip generation is based on, would not increase from the current number of students. However, the permitted number of students would increase from the number of students allowed by the current CUP. Therefore, a Traffic Study was prepared for the proposed project (included as Attachment 6 of the Initial Study, Exhibit 1). The report concluded that the increase in student enrollment above the permitted student enrollment is estimated to have resulted in 45 a.m, peak hour trips and 30 school p.m. peak hour (2:30 p.m, to 3:30 p.m.) trips. All of the intersections studied currently operate at acceptable levels of service of LOS D or better. These intersections operate at the same levels of service that would occur without the 50- student increase. In other words, there is no level of service difference with or without the 50 students above the permitted number of students. There is one exception to the acceptable LOS intersections — the intersection of Los Gatos - Saratoga Road and Massol Avenue, a one -way stop controlled intersection. The northbound left -turn movement from Massol Avenue onto Los Gatos - Saratoga Road is estimated at LOS F during a.m, and school p.m. peak hours, with or without the 50 students above the permitted number of students. However, the low volume of northbound left - turning traffic does not currently warrant the installation of a traffic signal. Town staff will continue to monitor the intersection to determine whether a traffic signal or other improvements may be needed in the future. The traffic study found the increase in the number of students above the permitted levels did not result in changes to the study intersections level of services. Therefore, no traffic or street improvements are required. However, traffic mitigation fees are required and the requirement is included as a performance standard. E. Community Benefit Pursuant to the Town's Traffic Impact Policy, a project that generates additional traffic of five or more peal-, hour trips may only be approved if the project's benefits to the community override the traffic impacts. Community benefit must be offered by the Planning Commission Staff Report - Page 8 219 Bean Avenue /PD- 11- 006/ND- 11- 008/S -12 -098 March 13, 2013 applicant, and the applicant must provide justification that the proposed community benefit offsets a project's impacts. The proposal would not increase the number of trips that exist since the number of students, which the trip generation is based on, would not increase from the current number of students. IIowever, the applicant offers the activities of St. Mary's church and school as community benefits in the letter of justification (Exhibit 6) including religious programs and services, community meeting space, the Country Fair, and nonprofit organization events. The Planning Commission shall determine whether the community benefit being offered sufficiently outweighs the traffic impacts caused by the project. F. Architecture & Site Application Through the subject A &S application, the applicant is proposing the following construction, which is consistent with the proposed Planned Development: • demolish the existing junior high school • construct a new junior high school • demolish the existing covered eating area • construct a new covered eating area • modifications to the lower school to accommodate a connection to the new junior high school The addition to the lower school, demolition of the teen center, and construction of a new rectory require separate A &S applications. The applicant is proposing the work on the junior high school and covered eating area as the first phase of changes. When the applicant is ready to complete the remainder of the work, they will be required to apply for appropriate permits from the Town including A &S. Staff recommends that the future A &S applications be reviewed by the DRC. This recommendation is included as a performance standard. The architecture and height of the church related residential structure would be reviewed through a future A &S application and height poles would be required at that time. G. Architectural Consultant Review The Planned Development and A &S applications were reviewed by the Town's Architectural Consultant (Exhibit 8). The consultant found that the applicant responded well to the recommendations, which are incorporated into the development plans (Exhibit C of Exhibit 11). Planning Commission Staff Report - Page 9 219 Bean Avenue /PD- 11- 006/ND- 11- 008/5 -12 -098 March 13, 2013 As stated earlier, the Town's Architectural Consultant also reviewed the applicant's request to exceed the height allowed by the zone. The consultant found the height request reasonable given that the junior high school would face a large open space and accommodate pedestrian access between the junior high school and the lower school. The consultant also found that ways to reduce the height may result in undesirable consequences to the project including inefficient pedestrian flow and unacceptable building design. H. Trees The project was reviewed by the Town's Arborist Consultant (Exhibit 9). The project would result in the removal of three trees (a 15" diameter tree of heaven, a multi -trunk loquat, and a 4" crepe myrtle). The applicant worked closely with the arborist to retain most of the existing trees including a large multi - trunk coast live oak tree. Tree protection measures are incorporated as conditions of approval to protect the existing trees on the subject property and within the development area, including measures recommended by the consulting arborist. The applicant will be required to plant replacement trees onsite pursuant to Town Code. I. General Plan The goals and policies of the 2020 General Plan applicable to this project include but are not limited to: • Policy LU -6.1 — Protect existing residential areas from the impacts of non - residential development. • Policy LU -6.2 — Allow non - residential activity in residential areas only when the character and quality of the neighborhood can be maintained. • Policy TRA -3.1 — All development proposals shall be reviewed to identify and mitigate project traffic impacts pursuant to the Town's traffic impact policy. • Policy TRA -3.4 — New projects shall not cause the level of service for intersections to drop more than one level if it is at Level A, B, or C and not drop at all if it is at D or below. • Policy TRA -9.6 — Require development proposals to include amenities that encourage alternate forms of transportation that reduce pollution or traffic congestion as a benefit to the community. • Policy NOI -2.2 — Require all noise - sensitive developments adjacent to or within an area where noise levels exceed community aspirations to include a noise study and recommendation for reducing noise impact to an acceptable level. • Policy NOI -5.1 — Protect residential areas from noise by requiring appropriate site and building design, sounds walls, and landscaping and by the use of noise attenuating construction techniques and materials. Planning Commission Staff Report - Page 10 219 Bean Avenue /PD- 11- 006/ND- 11- 008/5 -12 -098 March 13, 2013 CEQA Determination An Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS /MND) were prepared for this project (Exhibit 1). The following topics were identified and required mitigation: ® Air Quality — The mitigation measure addresses dust and criteria pollutant emissions control measures. ® Cultural Resources — The mitigation measures address encountering cultural resources. ® Hazards — The mitigation measure addresses recommendations to test for and, if necessary, provide protection for lead -based paint abatement. Noise — The mitigation measure addresses noise impacts to adjacent residential uses related to the grass playfield and construction measures for noise reduction. The mitigation measures are included as condition of approvals and a Mitigation Monitoring Plan was prepared (Exhibit 5). The comment period for the Mitigated Negative Declaration began on February 12, 2013 and ended on March 5, 2013. Story Poles Due to safety and operational concerns for the students and staff during the school year due to the location of the story poles an exception was previously approved to allow story poles to be installed from August 1 to 15, 2012, The Planning Commission and Town Council were notified at that time to review the installed poles. Photographs of the installed story poles are included as Exhibit 10. PUBLIC COMMENTS: At this time, the Town has not received any public comment. SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION: A. Summary The project would permit updates to the existing St. Mary's School and Parish operations and facilities including creating a Master Plan, allowing a new well - designed Junior High School, and updating the permitted number of students and staff to levels used today. Town staff and the consulting architect believe that the request to permit the new Junior High School to exceed the height limit is acceptable given that the building would be located towards the commercial uses that front on N. Santa Cruz Avenue and would not exceed the height of other structures already located on the St. Mary's property. Planning Commission Staff Report - Page 11 219 Bean Avenue /PD- 11- 006/ND- 11- 008/S -12 -098 March 13, 2013 B. Recommendation Based on the summary above, staff recommends approval of the Planned Development and Architecture and Site applications. The Planning Commission should take the following actions to forward the Mitigated Negative Declaration, Planned Development and Architecture and Site applications to the Town Council with a recommendation for approval: 1. Make the required findings (see Exhibit 3); 2. Recommend that the Town Council make the Mitigated Negative Declaration and adopt the Mitigation Monitoring Plan (Exhibit 5); 3. Recommend that the Town Council adopt the Planned Development Ordinance (Exhibit 11) and approve the project as proposed; and 4. Recommend that the Town Council approve Architecture and Site application S -12 -098 with recommended conditions of approval in Exhibit 4. Please note that the approval for the Architecture and Site application is contingent upon Town Council adoption of the Planned Development application. If the Commission has concerns with the application, it can: 1. Forward a recommendation for denial of the Planned Development Application to the Town Council; or 2. Continue the matter to a date certain with specific direction. >C) Vrepared by: Approved by: Jennifer L. Savage, AICP Todd Capurso Associate Planner Acting Director of Community Development TC:JS:ct cc: Jeffrey T. Berg, AIA /Steinberg Architects, 60 Pierce Avenue, San Jose, CA 95110 Roman Catholic Bishop of San Jose, 900 Lafayette, Suite 301, Santa Clara, CA 95050 N: \DEV \PC REP0RTS\2013 \Bean219.docx This Page Intentionally Left Blank INITIAL STUDY ST. MARY'S PARISH AND SCHOOL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AND NEW JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL BUILDING 219 BEAN AVENUE LOS GATOS, CALIFORNIA PLANNED DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION PD -11 -006 MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION ND -11 -008 ARCHITECTURE & SITE APPLICATION S -12 -098 PREPARED FOR TOWN OF LOS GATOS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 110 E. MAIN STREET Los GATOS, CA 95030 FEBRUARY 2013 This Page Intentionally Left Plank INITIAL STUDY ST. MARY'S PARISH AND SCHOOL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AND NEW JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL BUILDING 219 BEAN AVENUE LOS GATOS, CALIFORNIA PLANNED DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION PD- 11-006 { MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION ND -11 -008 ARCHITECTURE & SITE APPLICATION S -12 -098 PREPARED FOR TOWN OF Los GATOS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 110 E. MAIN STREET Los GATOS, CA 95030 FEBRUARY 2013 PREPARED BY GEIER & GEIER CONSULTING, INC. P.O. Box 5054 BERKELEY, CA 94705 -5054 510/644 -2535 This Page Intentionally Left Blank TOWN OF LOS GATOS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM Project Title: St. Mary's Parish & School Planned Development and New Junior High School Building Planned Development Application PD -11 -006 Mitigated Negative Declaration ND -11 -008 Architecture & Site Application S -12 -098 Lead Agency Name and Address: Town of Los Gatos Community Development Department 110 East Main Street Los Gatos, CA 95031 Contact Person and Phone Number: Jennifer Savage 408/399 -5702 Project Location: 219 Bean Avenue, APNs 510 -44 -083, 510 -44 -084, and 510 -44 -028 (Figure l) Project Applicant: Jeffrey T. Berg 60 Pierce Avenue San Jose, CA 95110 Contact: 408/817 -3176 Property Owner Name and Address: Roman Catholic Bishop of San Josh 900 Lafayette Street, Suite 301 Santa Clara, CA 95050 Contact: Rev. Msgr. Francis Cilia, 408/983 -0223 General Plan Designation: Medium Density Residential, 5 - 12 dwelling units /acre Zoning: R -11), Single Family Residential, Downtown; C -2, Central Business District Description of Project Site and History: The 4.18 -acre project site is located in the downtown area of Los Gatos at 219 Bean Avenue. The site consists of St. Mary's Church and School facilities and is bounded by Bean Avenue, Tait Avenue, the Lyndon Avenue cul -de -sac, and Victory Lane on the north, west, south, and east perimeters. Commercial and residential uses adjoin the southern boundary of the project site. The Santa Clara County Assessor's Office identifies the site as Assessor Parcel Numbers 510 -44- 028, -083, and -084. The project site is currently developed with 10 buildings that encompass the following uses: St. Mary's Church; a rectory and parish offices; administrative office building; Howley Hall (including after - school care facilities); a multi- purpose building; two lower school buildings; library and science lab uses in the 59 Victory Lane building; the Cougar Corner residence; and a garage near the church. Access to the site is available from Lyndon, Tait, and Bean avenues, and Victory Lane. FEBRUARY 2013 PROJECT LOCATION FIGURE 1 k and ose 6 219 BEAN AVENUE No SCALE INITIAL STUDY - 219 BEAN AVENUE St. Mary's was originally established in Los Gatos as a mission on Santa Cruz Avenue between Main Street and Bean Avenue. In 1912, the small hall used as the church was moved to the comer of Bean and Tait avenues, and St. Mary's was established as a parish in its present location. Two years later the first permanent rectory was built on parish property, and the current church was built in 1962. The school was opened in 1954. In 1985, a Conditional Use Permit was issued to St. Mary's Church and School when Lyndon Avenue was converted to a cul -de -sac, and St. Mary's built its Pastoral Center, which includes a multi- purpose room, administrative center, and school and ministry offices. At that time, the proposed parish and school improvements were implemented in compliance with all of the conditions of the approved CUP as outlined in Resolution 1985 -47. This document references approvals as defined in CUP U- 84 -17, A &S S- 84-60, and Subdivision Application M- 84 -21, respectively. During the past 26 years, the church and school have experienced changes of executive staff (pastor and principal), administrative staff, and volunteer leadership in the parish. Consequently, current management of the church and school were unaware of the Conditional Use Permit and its restrictions. After reviewing the provisions of the CUP, parish and school management compiled the required information to initiate an update of the CUP. Proposed Project: The project application includes two components. These involve: 1) establishment of a Planned Development (PD) Zoning District for the project site (Planned Development Application PD- 11 -006), including a lot merger for the 59 Victory Lane parcel (APN 510 -44 -028) and modification of the existing Conditional Use Permit (CUP) provisions for student, staff, and parking; and 2) Architectural and Site review for the development of a new junior high school building, renovation of the Lower School Building, and construction of a covered eating area structure. PD Zoning Proposal. The Parish and school management propose to replace aging and outdated facilities to ensure a quality education in modern facilities. The construction of a two -story classroom /library building at the eastern property line would permit the use of current facilities during construction without the use of temporary trailers or rental facilities. Once construction of the new junior high school building is completed, the demolition of the 59 Victory Lane building would then allow for replacement of the parking /play area. In addition, the early 1950's -era 'Grammar School' requires major restoration and much needed expansion. The Parish and school administration seek to create a more distinct Kindergarten area and provide plumbing facilities at each classroom. Complete renovation of the aged restroom facilities would provide compliance with ADA access requirements. The PD application also includes the demolition of the existing "Teen Center," the one -story building on the northeast corner of their campus (Cougar Corner) and construction of a new two -story residential structure. The aging structure is approximately 1,000 s.f. used primarily for child care or teen activities over recent years. In 2009, the Parish received approval from the Town to replace this building with a two - story, single - family home of approximately 3,000- square -feet to serve as the future rectory, the home of the priests who live on campus and serve the parish community. Although the approval expired, the proposed rectory building is included as part of the PD application for the review of the proposed project's potential cumulative environmental effects. Construction of the residential structure would be subject to Town review and further analysis through an Architecture and Site Application. Currently, the priests reside in a two -story building immediately east of the church. At this existing rectory, 3,035 s.f. are used for the priests' residences and 1,085 s.f. are used for parish offices, meeting space, and storage. Following construction of the future rectory, the entire existing rectory would be converted to parish office and administrative use. The existing Administrative Building would continue to be used for both school and parish administrative uses. FEBRUARY 2013 3 INITIAL STUDY - 219 BEAN AVENUE The proposed school site improvements would include the following elements: • Construction of a new, approximately 13,500 s.f. classroom building on the campus of St. Mary's parish and school. The building would consist of general education classrooms, a break out room, a science lab, an art classroom, a library, and related office spaces. The building would be two stories above grade with a standard concrete spread footing foundation system and wood frame construction. The building would be Occupancy Type E, Construction Type V -B, and equipped throughout with an automatic fire sprinkler system and fire alarm. • Renovation of the site's one - story, wood -frame classroom building and expansion of the structure with an approximately 1,200 net square foot addition. • Demolition of the one -story building at 59 Victory Lane and lot merger. • Construction of a new, approximately 3,000 square foot covered eating area. • Extension of existing site utilities, pedestrian walkways, and concrete flat work to support new development. • Demolition of the Cougar's Corner building and construction of future rectory. • Renovation of the existing rectory for parish administrative use. The plans for the future rectory requires further Architectural and Site review by the Town. Operational Modifications. Existing operations at St. Mary's School are subject to conditions listed in the CUP described above (CUP U- 84 -17). The 12 original conditions stipulated in that CUP are included as Attachment 1 of this study. An appeal of the CUP approval by the Town's Planning Commission was denied and the Town Council approved Resolution 1985 -47 imposing the original conditions of approval and the following four conditions: "Conditional Use Permit Application U- 84 -17, Architecture and Site Application S- 84 -60, and Subdivision Application M -84 -21 are approved subject to the conditions of approval set by the Planning Commission and the following additional conditions: 13. The maximum number of seats in the church shall be 654; the maximum number of students enrolled in the school, grades 1 — 8, shall be 265; and the maximum number of employees shall be 20. 14. The Planning Commission shall review the traffic impact and the adequacy of circulation and parking six (6) months after the completion of the improvements. 15. Applicant to revise landscaping plan to replace ficus trees with larger trees and to plant conifers around the perimeter, especially on Victory Lane, Bean Avenue and Tait Avenue, subject to review by the Director of Parks, Forestry and Maintenance Services. 16. The success of the education program concerning parking and alternatives will be reviewed by the Planning Commission six (6) months after the completion of the improvements." Proposed Operations under the Planned Development. The project sponsor, St. Mary's Parish and School, is requesting modifications to the existing operations to allow for the following: ■ The current student population of 315 pupils would use the new facilities. The Parish and school do not propose to increase the current student enrollment. The current student enrollment represents an increase from the enrollment permitted by the 1985 CUP, i.e. 265 students, a net increase of 50 students from the 1985 enrollment level. FEBRUARY 2013 4 INITIAL STUDY — 219 BEAN AVENUE ■ The current school and church staff of 35.7 full -time equivalent (FTE) employees would use the new facilities. The Parish and school do not propose to increase the current staff (37.5 FTE). The current staff represents an increase from the enrollment listed in the 1985 CUP (20 FTE), a net increase of 15.7 FTE staff. Increased Enrollment. St. Mary's School has been in operation since 1954, and its enrollment has fluctuated according to population trends and the desire of parents to provide their children with values - based education. Enrollment was at more than 400 students in the 1960's. At that time, up to 50 students were assigned to each of St. Mary's classrooms. When the original Conditional Use Permit was issued in 1985, population trends had changed and there were many fewer students to be accommodated in elementary schools. The student population at that time was 237 students in grades 1 -8. In 1999, a local private preschool /kindergarten closed and St. Mary's School added a kindergarten class to help fill this educational void. St. Mary's added a 35- student kindergarten program in academic year '1999 -2000 and the total number of current students is 315. Presently, St. Mary's CUP permits 265 students in grades 1 -8. In 1999, a local private preschool /kindergarten closed and St. Mary's School added a kindergarten class to help fill this educational void. St. Mary's added a 35- student kindergarten program in academic year 1999 -2000 and the total number of current students is 315. St. Mary's Parish and school management are requesting a revision of the original CUP to update the maximum student enrollment to 315 children. The Parish would not increase student enrollment in the future since existing and proposed facilities would not support enrollment beyond current levels (9 Classrooms x 35 Students /Room = 315 Students). Increased Staffing Level. The existing CUP states that 20 employees are permitted to work at the site. The CUP does not address the number of volunteers that may work at the church and school. The applicant has noted that there has been a significant change in the way work is accomplished in churches of all denominations, in all parts of the country. The amount of work has not necessarily increased, but churches are less reliant on volunteers and more dependent on paid staff. Consequently, the number of people working in the administrative office generally has not changed since 1985, but their status has changed from volunteer to employee. When all programs are operating fully, St. Mary's Church employs eight fulltime staff and five part -time staff (equaling 2.1 FTE). St. Mary's School is a nine - months -a -year operation. It does not offer summer school. The school currently employs 15 full -time staff and 25 part - time staff (equaling 10.6 FTE).' Consequently, the Parish and school currently require 35.7 FTE employees. The applicant is requesting that the permitted operations for St. Mary's Church and School be updated to reflect the 35.7 FTE employees that work there. For parking purposes, the applicant plans to use an employee count of 36. Consistent with this request, the applicant proposes to amend Condition No. 13 of the existing CUP as follows: ■ The maximum number of seats in the church shall be 654; the maximum number of students enrolled in the school, grades K — 8, shall be 315; and the maximum number of employees shall be 35.7 FTE. Parking. Currently, there are a total of 105 parking spaces on the subject property. These include: 1) 72 marked spaces; 2) three (3) garage spaces; and 3) sufficient area for an additional 30 cars in unmarked spaces in the children's "play area" at the center of campus. In addition, the current 59 Victory Lane ' One FrE position is equal to 40 hours per week. FEBRUARY 2013 INITIAL STUDY — 219 BEAN AVENUE property has one on -site parking space and six off -site parking credits. The applicant proposes to continue providing the one on -site parking space as required for the Downtown Parking district, The existing CUP recognizes the 105 parking spaces as an approved, nonconforming situation, and Town Code allows nonconforming church uses to continue interminably. There has been no change to the number of seats in the church (654). The applicant indicates that there is more than sufficient space to accommodate the parking demand of employees for both the school and church on a daily operational basis. When school is not in session, such as during weekend masses or evening religious activities, the blacktop playground is used for parking, bringing the total on -site parking capacity to approximately 105 spaces. This parking is self - directed. Also, the required vehicular access to Victory Lane would be maintained as part of the proposed project. The applicant's ongoing communications program educates the parish community about parking options on the St. Mary's property and in adjacent public lots via flyers, bulletins, website (www.stmaryslg.org), and meetings such as State of the School. As part of this program, the school administration asks school families to ride share. Continuing efforts are made to remind parishioners and their guests to be sensitive to the needs and concerns of other residents of the St. Mary's neighborhood. Architecture and Site Review. As part of the proposed site improvements, the applicant is requesting Architecture and Site review for the new Junior High School building, demolition of 59 Victory Lane, renovations to the existing Lower School building, and construction of a new covered eating area structure. The scope of work consists of the following: ■ Construction of a new, approximately 13,500 square foot classroom building on the project site. • Renovations to the existing one -story wood frame classroom building. • Construction of approximately 3,000 s.f. of covered eating area. ■ Extension of site utilities, pedestrian walkways and concrete flatwork to support new development. The applicant is not requesting Architecture and Site review for the proposed future rectory or lower school building additions at this time. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: The project site is comprised of approximately 4.18 acres located in downtown Los Gatos and bounded by Lyndon, Tait, and Bean avenues, and Victory Lane on the south, west, north, and east sides, respectively. Lyndon Avenue provides access to the school site and also serves adjoining residential and commercial uses to the south of the school. Single- family residences line Tait and Bean avenues opposite the church and school' site, to the west and north. Parking lots and the rear facades of commercial buildings occur along the east side of Victory Lane adjacent to the project site. A commercial building at 61 Victory Lane (APN 510- 44 -27) adjoins two of the site's school buildings: the Cougar Corner structure to the west and the 59 Victory Lane building to the south. In addition, the school grounds surround a single- family residence at 30 Tait Avenue (APN 510 -44 -059). Other agencies whose approval is required (e.g., permits, financing approval, or participation agreements): None. FEBRUARY 2013 6 INITIAL STUDY - 219 BEAN AVENUE ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED: The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages: DETERMINATION: (TO BE COMPLETED BY THE LEAD AGENCY) On the basis of this initial evaluation: Aesthetics Agriculture Resources X Air Quality Biological Resources X Cultural Resources Geology /Soils X Hazards & Hazardous Materials Hydrology /Water Quality Land Use /Planning Mineral Resources X Noise Population /Housing Public Services Recreation Transportation /Traffic Utilities /Service Systems Mandatory Findings of Significance DETERMINATION: (TO BE COMPLETED BY THE LEAD AGENCY) On the basis of this initial evaluation: 12— P,'h `13 ToJgCapurso[ActinjArectdof Community Development Date FEBRUARY 2013 7 I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. X I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. I find that the proposed project MAY have a "potentially significant impact" or "potentially significant unless mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project, nothing further is required. 12— P,'h `13 ToJgCapurso[ActinjArectdof Community Development Date FEBRUARY 2013 7 INITIAL STUDY — 219 BEAN AVENUE EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS 1a. Scenic Vista The 4.18 -acre project site is located in downtown Los Gatos and developed with ten buildings that include St. Mary's Church, school buildings, a rectory, and offices for parish and school administration. The buildings are distributed throughout the property along with paved and landscaped areas used as playfields and parking areas, and for general school activities. Views from the project site and surrounding residential uses on Tait and Bean avenues are predominantly of single- family homes and associated mature landscaping that characterize this downtown neighborhood. There are limited and intermittent views of the Santa Cruz Mountains to the south of the town, but these views are extensively screened by mature landscape trees. Consequently, no views of scenic vistas are available from the project area. 1b. Scenic Resources Within a State Scenic Highway The proposed project is located in downtown Los Gatos, approximately 950 feet northwest of State Route 17 and 0.35 miles south of State Route 9. Neither of these state highways is designated as a scenic highway in the town of Los Gatos; State Route 9 is a state - designated scenic highway in the city of Saratoga, north of Los Gatos. However, the project site is not visible from either of these highways. Consequently, the project would have no effects on scenic resources within a state scenic highway. 1c. Visual Character The project would involve the establishment of a PD Zoning District for the project site, including a lot merger for the 59 Victory Lane parcel. In addition, the development application entails Architectural and Site review for the development of a new, two -story Junior High School Building (JHSB), demolition of the single -story building at 59 Victory Lane, the renovation of the Lower School Buildings (LSB), and construction of a covered eating area structure. The proposed JHSB would be located on an open, paved portion of the site that currently serves as a play /parking area. The JHSB would be situated between the Lower School Building (LSB) and the 59 Victory Lane structure. Upon completion of the JHSB and transfer of academic activities to this new building, the 59 Victory Lane building would be demolished and a new play /parking area would be constructed as a replacement use for this part of the site. A one - story, covered seating area would be installed immediately north of the new play /parking area; this area is presently an open, turf- covered area associated with the Cougar Corner building. Additionally, new landscaping would be planted around the perimeter of the new play /parking area and covered seating area, including the site area adjoining Victory Lane. FEBRUARY 2013 Less Than Significant Potentially With Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Issues (and Supporting Information Sources) Impact Incorporated hnpact Impact 1. Aesthetics - Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? X b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state X scenic highway? c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of X the site and its surroundings? d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would X adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? 1a. Scenic Vista The 4.18 -acre project site is located in downtown Los Gatos and developed with ten buildings that include St. Mary's Church, school buildings, a rectory, and offices for parish and school administration. The buildings are distributed throughout the property along with paved and landscaped areas used as playfields and parking areas, and for general school activities. Views from the project site and surrounding residential uses on Tait and Bean avenues are predominantly of single- family homes and associated mature landscaping that characterize this downtown neighborhood. There are limited and intermittent views of the Santa Cruz Mountains to the south of the town, but these views are extensively screened by mature landscape trees. Consequently, no views of scenic vistas are available from the project area. 1b. Scenic Resources Within a State Scenic Highway The proposed project is located in downtown Los Gatos, approximately 950 feet northwest of State Route 17 and 0.35 miles south of State Route 9. Neither of these state highways is designated as a scenic highway in the town of Los Gatos; State Route 9 is a state - designated scenic highway in the city of Saratoga, north of Los Gatos. However, the project site is not visible from either of these highways. Consequently, the project would have no effects on scenic resources within a state scenic highway. 1c. Visual Character The project would involve the establishment of a PD Zoning District for the project site, including a lot merger for the 59 Victory Lane parcel. In addition, the development application entails Architectural and Site review for the development of a new, two -story Junior High School Building (JHSB), demolition of the single -story building at 59 Victory Lane, the renovation of the Lower School Buildings (LSB), and construction of a covered eating area structure. The proposed JHSB would be located on an open, paved portion of the site that currently serves as a play /parking area. The JHSB would be situated between the Lower School Building (LSB) and the 59 Victory Lane structure. Upon completion of the JHSB and transfer of academic activities to this new building, the 59 Victory Lane building would be demolished and a new play /parking area would be constructed as a replacement use for this part of the site. A one - story, covered seating area would be installed immediately north of the new play /parking area; this area is presently an open, turf- covered area associated with the Cougar Corner building. Additionally, new landscaping would be planted around the perimeter of the new play /parking area and covered seating area, including the site area adjoining Victory Lane. FEBRUARY 2013 INITIAL STUDY - 219 BEAN AVENUE It should be noted that proposed physical improvements planned as part of the project would occur on portions of the subject property that are adjacent to Victory Lane, a right -of -way that serves as an alley and services commercial uses along the alley, i.e. 61 Victory Lane, and businesses that front on North Santa Cruz Avenue. Victory Lane is primarily used for service vehicle access to North Santa Cruz Avenue establishments and parking for these commercial uses. The rear fagade (east elevation) of the proposed two -story JHSB would be located on Victory Lane, across and opposite the rear fagade of the Los Gatos Cinema. The maximum building height of the Los Gatos Cinema is 33 -feet, 3- inches. The maximum height of the new JHSB, including mechanical screening, would be 34 -feet, 2- inches. The development of the JHSB at its proposed location would result in building heights consistent with height of the closest off -site structure (Los Gatos Cinema) adjoining the project site. The one -story building at 59 Victory Lane presently provides the school with library, science lab, 81" grade classroom, Spanish instruction, and art classroom facilities. These academic facilities would be relocated to the new JHSB. The demolition of the 59 Victory Lane building would permit construction of a paved play /parking area, which would replace the similar area to be occupied by the new JHSB. This new play /parking area would be located adjacent to Victory Lane and an existing parking lot at the near of the commercial building containing six businesses addressed at 47 through 57 North Santa Cruz Avenue. The new play /parking area proposed for the project site would be visually consistent with the existing parking lot across Victory Lane from the site. Views of the project site are primarily available to residents, pedestrians, and vehicles traveling along Tait and Bean avenues to the west and north, respectively, of the project site. All of the currently proposed project development would occur along the eastern perimeter of the site, adjoining Victory Lane. Although portions of the new JHSB would be visible from surrounding streets, on- site, public, and neighboring residential landscaping screens views of the eastern portion of the project site from these two streets and the visual character of the project site would remain unchanged to residents, visitors, and travelers along Tait and Bean avenues. Views of the project site that would be most susceptible to change include those from 61 Victory Lane, the public and private parking lots on Victory Lane opposite of the project site, and Lyndon Avenue. To the extent that the visual character of the project site and its surroundings is defined by the one- and two - story residential and commercial structures of the surrounding downtown area, the proposed project's replacement of one single -story structure with one two -story building would not substantially degrade the visual character of the project site or the project area. The aging structure at 59 Victory Lane would be replaced by a contemporary educational facility that is consistent with the architectural style of other buildings on the campus. In order to assess the potential effects of the proposed project's architecture and site design on the visual character of the project site, the Town required a peer review of the project design plans by the Town's contract architectural consultant, Cannon Design Group (CDG). CDG reviewed the project plans and prepared a report (October 10, 2012) detailing potential concerns with the design submitted to the Town and providing design options to address these issues. The final CDG report is included in this study as Attachment 2. Briefly, the CDG review indicates that there are no concerns or issues with the proposed renovation of the LSB and the report includes no recommendations for this project element. The design review report presented five recommendations that would address the design issues for the JHSB. The project applicant and design team reviewed the CDG recommendations and have incorporated them into the project design to address the site and building design issues raised by the CDG report. FEBRUARY 2013 9 INITIAL STUDY — 219 BEAN AVENUE Consequently, the proposed project would not have a significant effect on the visual character of the project site and surroundings. The proposed PD Zoning designation would also facilitate the development of a two - story, single - family residence (rectory) in the northeast corner of the project site, replacing the existing structure, Cougar's Corner, at this location. The applicant has previously submitted a proposed plan for this building and it was approved on July 15, 2008. The approval has expired and appropriate permits will be required from the Town for future development. The applicant proposes to construct this building at some uncertain future date. Views of the proposed rectory would be available primarily from Bean Avenue and Victory Lane. Views of the existing Cougar's Corner structure are screened by three large redwood trees along the northern perimeter of the project site. These trees are proposed to remain, providing future screening for the proposed rectory as well as shade and other amenities. Consequently, with the retention of these mature trees and additional landscape plantings as recommended by the Town's architectural consultant, the future development of the proposed rectory would have less than significant effects on the visual character of the project site and adjoining neighborhood. 1d. Light or Glare St. Mary's Parish and School buildings currently have exterior lighting fixtures, which are a source of nighttime lighting. Outdoor lighting also would be provided on the exterior of proposed buildings. Proposed lighting would be subject to Section 29.10.09035 of the Zoning Ordinance, which prohibits the production of direct or reflected glare (such as that produced by floodlight) onto any area outside the project boundary. Retention of existing site trees as well as additional landscape plantings would also help reduce the potential for increased nighttime lighting at adjacent properties. FEBRUARY 2013 10 Less Than Significant Potentially with Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Issues (and Supporting Information Sources) Impact Incorporated Impact Impact 2. Agriculture and Forestry Resources — In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the California Dept. of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. In determining whether impacts to forest resources, including timberland, are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to information compiled by the California Dept. of Forestry and Fire Protection regarding the state's inventory of forest land, and forest carbon measurement methodology provided in Forest Protocols adopted by the California Air Resources Board. Would the project: a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps X prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non - agricultural use? b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a X Williamson Act contract? FEBRUARY 2013 10 INITIAL STUDY — 219 BEAN AVENUE 2a — 2e. Farmland, Agricultural, and Forestry Uses The 4.18 -acre school campus is currently developed with church and school facilities. It has been used as a church and school for over 50 years and would continue in this use with proposed modifications to the operations through the Planned Development application. Since the site is not in agricultural use, the project would not adversely affect any existing agricultural or forest resources or operations. With the surrounding properties in residential use, the proposed project would not adversely affect other agricultural properties or result in the conversion of farmland to non - agricultural use. Less Than Significant Potentially With Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Issues (and Supporting Information Sources) Impact Incorporated Impact Impact c) Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of, forest X land (as defined in Public Resources Code section 12220(g)), X timberland (as defined in Public Resources Code section 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by X Government Code section 51104(g))? d) Result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest land to X X non - forest use? e) Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to X their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non - agricultural use or conversion of forest land to non - forest use? X 2a — 2e. Farmland, Agricultural, and Forestry Uses The 4.18 -acre school campus is currently developed with church and school facilities. It has been used as a church and school for over 50 years and would continue in this use with proposed modifications to the operations through the Planned Development application. Since the site is not in agricultural use, the project would not adversely affect any existing agricultural or forest resources or operations. With the surrounding properties in residential use, the proposed project would not adversely affect other agricultural properties or result in the conversion of farmland to non - agricultural use. 3a. Air Quality Planning The San Prancisco Bay Area Air Basin is classified by the Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD) as non- attainment for ozone and inhalable particulates (PMto). To address these exceedances, the BAAQMD, in cooperation with the MTC and ABAG, prepared the Bay Area 2005 Ozone Strategy (BAGS) in September 2005 and Particulate Matter Implementation Schedule (PMIS) in FEBRUARY 2013 11. Less Than Significant Potentially With Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Issues (and Supporting Information Sources) Impact Incorporated Impact Impact 3. Air Quality and Climate Change - Would the project: a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air X quality plan? b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an X existing or projected air quality violation? c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria X pollutant for which the project region is non- attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions, which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant X concentrations? e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of X people? 3a. Air Quality Planning The San Prancisco Bay Area Air Basin is classified by the Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD) as non- attainment for ozone and inhalable particulates (PMto). To address these exceedances, the BAAQMD, in cooperation with the MTC and ABAG, prepared the Bay Area 2005 Ozone Strategy (BAGS) in September 2005 and Particulate Matter Implementation Schedule (PMIS) in FEBRUARY 2013 11. INITIAL STUDY — 219 BEAN AVENUE November 2005. The PMIS discusses how the BAAQMD implements the California Air Resources Board's 103 particulate matter control measures. In September 2010, the BAAQMD adopted the 2010 Bay Area Clean Air Plan (CAP), which updates the BAOS. The most recently adopted air quality plan in the Basin is the 2010 Bay Area Clean Air Plan (CAP). This CAP outlines how the San Francisco Bay Area will attain air quality standards, reduce population exposure and protect public health, and reduce GHG emissions. The consistency of the proposed project with the most recently adopted regional air quality plan, the CAP, is determined by comparing the project's consistency with the Los Gatos 2020 General Plan, which was also adopted in September 2010. Since the CAP is based on the Town's General Plan in effect at the time the CAP was approved, consistency of the project with the 2020 General Plan would indicate consistency with the 2010 CAP. While the proposed school use is allowed under the current General Plan designation of Medium Density Residential, the student population for the site is not defined by the General Plan. However, since there would be no population growth associated with the school use and proposed operations, the project would not conflict with ABAG's 2009 population projections, and therefore, the project would be consistent with the CAP. 3b. Air Quality Standards Regulatory and Planning Framework. The BAAQMD is responsible for attaining and /or maintaining air quality in the San Francisco Bay Area Air Basin (SFBAAB) within Federal and State air quality standards. Specifically, the BAAQMD has the responsibility to monitor ambient air pollutant levels throughout the Basin and to develop and implement strategies to attain the applicable Federal and State standards. In June 2010, the BAAQMD adopted CEQA thresholds of significance and updated its CEQA Air Quality Guidelines, which provides guidance for assessing air quality impacts under CEQA. However, on March 5, 2012, the Alameda County Superior Court issued a judgment finding that the BAAQMD had failed to comply with CEQA when it adopted the Thresholds. The court issued a writ of mandate ordering the BAAQMD to set aside the Thresholds and cease dissemination of them until the BAAQMD had complied with CEQA. The matter is now on appeal. Notably, the court's ruling was based purely on procedural grounds, namely, the BAAQMD's failure to comply with CEQA. Nothing in the ruling called into question the validity of the science underlying the recommended significance thresholds. Determining thresholds of air quality impact significance is at the discretion of the Lead Agency tinder CEQA. Thresholds may be set at the currently unsupported 2010/2011 BAAQMD emissions -based levels, at the adopted 1999 thresholds, or at any scientifically supportable alternative level. Significance Thresholds. Exercising its own discretion as lead agency and similar to many other San Francisco Bay Area jurisdictions, the Town of Los Gatos has decided to rely on the thresholds within the Options and Justification Report (dated October 2009) prepared by the BAAQMD. The BAAQMD Options and Justification Report establishes thresholds based' on substantial evidence and are consistent with the thresholds outlined within the 2010 CEQA Air Quality Guidelines. Although BAAQMD failed to comply with CEQA before completing its 2010 recommendations, Town staff believes that these recommendations, which are listed as follows, still represent the best available science on the subject of what constitute significant air quality effects in the SFBAAB: • NOX and ROG: 54 pounds /day • PM 10: 82 pounds /day • PM2.5: 54 pounds /day Project Emissions. The project's construction - related and operational emissions are estimated and compared to the above significance thresholds in Table 1. As shown in this table, the project's construction - related and operational air pollutant emissions would not exceed the BAAQMD significance thresholds for criteria pollutants, a less -than- significant impact. However, the BAAQMD recommends the all Basic Construction Mitigation Measures be implemented for all construction projects, whether or not FEBRUARY 2013 12 INITIAL STUDY - 219 BEAN AVENUE construction - related emissions exceed these significance thresholds. Therefore, the project's construction - related and operational increases in criteria pollutant emissions would be less than significant with implementation of Mitigation Measure AQ -1. TABLE 1 PROJECT - RELATED OPERATIONAL CRITERIA POLLUTANT EMISSIONS Average Daily Emissions (pounds /day) PM10 PM2.s Project Activity ROG NO, CO SO, (Total) (Total) Project Construction' - Off -Road Equipment Emissions 11.6 23.9 16.7 0.0 1.8 1.7 Significance Thresholds 54 54 - - 82 54 Project Operation - Area Source Emissions - Energy Emissions - Mobile Source Emissions 0.27 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.05 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.41 0.78 3.64 0.00 0.57 0.03 Total 0.69 0.83 3.68 0.00 0.57 0.03 Significance Thresholds 54 54 - - 82 54 Exceeds Thresholds With Mitigation? No No -b No No Average Annual Emissions (tons /year) PM10 PM2.s Project Activity ROG NO, CO SO, (Total) (Total) Project Construction - Off -Road Equipment Emissions 0.37 1.66 1.18 0.00 0.13 0.12 Significance Thresholds 10 10 - - 15 10 Project Operation - Area Source Emissions 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Energy Emissions 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Mobile Source Emissions 0.05 0.10 0.46 0.00 0.06 0.00 Total 0.10 0.11 0.47 0.00 0.06 0.00 Significance Thresholds 10 10 - - 15 10 Exceeds Thresholds With Mitigation? No No - - No No Notes: ROG = reactive organic gases; NO, = nitrogen oxides; CO = carbon monoxide; SO2 = sulfur dioxide; exhaust PMT, = particulate matter less than 10 microns; exhaust PM,., = particulate matter less than 2.5 microns. a Construction assumptions: 9,565 s.f. of net new uses, demolition of 7,918 s.f. Demolition would occur over 20 work days using 1 concrete saw, 1 dozer, and 2 loaders; grading would occur over 20 work days using 1 concrete saw, 1 dozer, and 2 loaders; construction would occur over 100 work days using 1 crane, 2 forklifts, 2 loaders, 1 generator set, 1 air compressor, and 1 welder; and paving would occur over 20 work days using 4 mixers, 1 paver, 1 roller, and 1 loader /backhoe. b CO: If localized carbon monoxide estimated emissions exceed 550 pounds /day, more detailed analysis is required. Therefore, emissions below this threshold indicate that CO emissions would be less than significant. ° SO2: The SO, state and federal standards are currently being met throughout the Bay Area and have been met in recent decades. Therefore, the project's estimated emissions would be less than significant. SOURCE: CalEEMod Output (see Attachment 3) 3c. Cumulative Air Quality Impacts To address cumulative impacts on regional air quality, the BAAQMD has established thresholds of significance for construction - related and operational criteria pollutants and precursor emissions. These thresholds represent the levels at which a project's individual emissions of criteria pollutants and precursors would result in a cumulatively considerable contribution to the SFBAAB's existing air quality conditions. If daily average or annual emissions exceed these thresholds, the project would result in a FEBRUARY 2013 13 INITIAL STUDY — 219 BEAN AVENUE cumulatively significant impact. Since the project's construction - related and operational criteria pollutant emissions would not exceed BAAQMD significance thresholds (as indicated in Table 1), the project's contribution would be less than cumulatively considerable and therefore, less than significant. In addition, when the project's construction- related diesel particulate matter (DPM) emissions are considered with other existing stationary and mobile sources of toxic air contaminants (TACs), the project's contribution to cumulative emissions would not contribution to cumulative construction - related risk and hazard impacts would not be cumulatively considerable, a less -than- significant impact (see Section 3d below for more discussion). 3d. Exposure of Sensitive Receptors The California Air Resources Board (CARB) regulates vehicle fuels with the intent to reduce emissions. Diesel exhaust is a serious concern throughout California. The CARB identified diesel engine particulate matter as a toxic air contaminant and human carcinogen. In 2005, the CARB approved a regulatory measure to reduce emissions of toxic and criteria pollutants by limiting the idling of new heavy -duty diesel vehicles, which altered five sections of Title 13 of the California Code of Regulations. The changes relevant to the proposed project are in Section 2485, Airborne Toxic Control Measure to Limit Diesel - Fueled Commercial Motor Vehicle Idling, which limit idling of a vehicle's primary diesel engine for greater than five minutes in any location (with some exceptions) or operation of a diesel - fueled auxiliary power system within 100 feet of residential areas. Sensitive receptors are defined as facilities or land uses that include members of the population that are particularly sensitive to the effects of air pollutants, such as children, the elderly, and people with illnesses. Examples of these sensitive receptors are residences, schools, hospitals, and daycare centers. The CARB has identified the following groups of individuals as the most likely to be affected by air pollution: the elderly over 65, children under 14, athletes, and persons with cardiovascular and chronic respiratory diseases such as asthma, emphysema, and bronchitis. Students at St. Mary's School are considered to be the closest sensitive receptors to project construction. Combustion emissions from operation of off -road construction equipment on the project site would be generated during project construction and could expose sensitive receptors to diesel particulate matter (DPM) and other toxic air contaminants (TACs) that are associated with various health risk factors. A screening -level construction - related health risk analysis was completed for the project and impacts on sensitive receptors at the maximally- exposed individual (MEI) level from DPM emissions (see Figure 1 of Attachment 3). The results of the health risk screening are summarized in Table 2. As indicated in this table, the project's construction - related DPM emissions would not exceed BAAQMD significance thresholds for cancer and non- cancer health risks (including the highest age sensitivity factor for infants, up to 2 years in age) and therefore, would result in a temporary, less- than - significant health risk to students. In addition to the above construction - related risk and hazard impacts, sensitive receptors in the project vicinity would be exposed to cumulative risk and hazard impacts from the project's construction - related emissions in combination with existing stationary and mobile sources within approximately 1,000 feet of the project area. When emissions from the SR 17 freeway in addition to two diesel- powered emergency generators located within approximately 1,000 feet of the project are considered, cumulative health risks would be as indicated in Table 3. As shown in this table, cumulative emissions would not exceed the Town's cumulative significance thresholds for risk and hazard impacts at new sensitive receptors. Therefore, the project's contribution to cumulative construction - related risk and hazard impacts would not be cumulatively considerable, a less- than - significant impact. FEBRUARY 2013 14 INITIAL STUDY — 219 BEAN AVENUE TABLE 2 CANCER RISK AND CHRONIC NON - CANCER HEALTH RISKS AT THE CLOSEST SENSITIVE RECEPTORS DUE TO DPM EXPOSURE DURING PROJECT CONSTRUCTION SOURCE: Health Risk Screening Analysis (see Attachment 3) TABLE 3 CUMULATIVE RISK AND HAZARD IMPACTS FROM EXISTING STATIONARY AND MOBILE SOURCES AND PROJECT DPM SOURCES PM2.a Exposure, Cancer Risk, and Non - PM -2.5 Cancer Chronic Hazard Index from Project Construction Activities at Closest Parameter Residences Maximum One -Hour PM2.5 2.237 gg/m3 Annual Average PM,., (one -hour x 0.1) 0.2237 gg /m3 Annual Average PM,., Significance Threshold 0.3 gg /m3 Exceeds Threshold? No Age- Weighted Concentration for Infants 9.59 in a million Children 2.88 in a million Adults 0.96 in a million Cancer Risk Significance Threshold Excess Cancer Risk >10 x 10 -6 Exceeds Threshold? No Chronic Non- Cancer Health Risk 0.0447 Chronic Non - Cancer Significance Threshold Hazard Index >1.0 Exceeds Threshold? No SOURCE: Health Risk Screening Analysis (see Attachment 3) TABLE 3 CUMULATIVE RISK AND HAZARD IMPACTS FROM EXISTING STATIONARY AND MOBILE SOURCES AND PROJECT DPM SOURCES Significance Threshold 100 0.8 1 1 SOURCE: Health Risk Screening Analysis (see Attachment 3) 3e. Odors According to the BAAQMD CE QA Air Quality Guidelines, land uses associated with odor complaints typically include wastewater treatment plants, landfills, confined animal facilities, composting stations, food manufacturing plants, refineries, and chemical plants. The project would not include any uses identified by the BAAQMD as being associated with odors. No new or unusual sources of nuisance odors would be associated with the proposed expansion of school operations. Therefore, the project's potential for nuisance odor problems would be less than significant. During project construction, however, nuisance diesel odors associated with operation of diesel construction equipment on -site (primarily during initial grading phases) could occur, but this effect would be localized, sporadic, and short -term in nature. Therefore, temporary impacts from nuisance diesel odors on adjacent residential receptors is considered to be less than significant. FEBRUARY 2013 15 PM -2.5 Risk Concentration Chronic Acute* Type Source (cases in a million) gg /m3 Hazard Hazard Stationary Source Emergency Generators 0.33 0.001 0.0002 0.0012 Mobile Source SR 17 Freeway 1.88 0.070 <0.03 <0.03 Individual Project (worst -case) 9.59 0.224 0.0447 0.3800 Maximum Cumulative Total 11.8 0.295 <0.0749 <0.4112 Significance Threshold 100 0.8 1 1 SOURCE: Health Risk Screening Analysis (see Attachment 3) 3e. Odors According to the BAAQMD CE QA Air Quality Guidelines, land uses associated with odor complaints typically include wastewater treatment plants, landfills, confined animal facilities, composting stations, food manufacturing plants, refineries, and chemical plants. The project would not include any uses identified by the BAAQMD as being associated with odors. No new or unusual sources of nuisance odors would be associated with the proposed expansion of school operations. Therefore, the project's potential for nuisance odor problems would be less than significant. During project construction, however, nuisance diesel odors associated with operation of diesel construction equipment on -site (primarily during initial grading phases) could occur, but this effect would be localized, sporadic, and short -term in nature. Therefore, temporary impacts from nuisance diesel odors on adjacent residential receptors is considered to be less than significant. FEBRUARY 2013 15 INITIAL STUDY — 219 BEAN AVENUE Mitigation Measures — Air Quality (AQ) Although the project's construction - related air pollutant emissions would not exceed the BAAQMD's applicable significance thresholds, the following measures are recommended by the BAAQMD to reduce the project's construction emissions: AQ -1: Basic Construction Measures. To limit the project's construction - related dust and criteria pollutant emissions, the following BAAQMD - recommended Basic Construction Mitigation Measures shall be included in the project's grading plan, building plans, and contract specifications: a. All exposed surfaces (e.g., parking areas, staging areas, soil piles, graded areas, and unpaved access roads) shall be watered two times per day. b. All haul trucks transporting soil, sand, or other loose material off -site shall be covered. c. All visible mud or dirt track -out onto adjacent public roads shall be removed using wet power vacuum street sweepers at least once per day. The use of dry power sweeping is prohibited. d. All vehicle speeds on unpaved roads shall be limited to 15 mph. e. All roadways, driveways, and sidewalks to be paved shall be completed as soon as possible. f. Idling times shall be minimized either by shutting equipment off when not in use or reducing the maximum idling time to five minutes (as required by the California airborne toxics control measure Title 13, Section 2485 of California Code of Regulations [CCR]). Clear signage shall be provided for construction workers at all access points. g. All construction equipment shall be maintained and properly tuned in accordance with manufacturer's specifications. All equipment shall be checked by a certified mechanic and determined to be running in proper condition prior to operation. h. Post a publicly visible sign with the telephone number and person to contact at the Town regarding dust complaints. This person shall respond and take corrective action within 48 hours. The BAAQMD's phone number shall also be visible to ensure compliance with applicable regulations. FEBRUARY 2013 16 Less Than Significant Potentially With Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Issues (and Supporting Information Sources) Impact Incorporated Impact Impact 4. Biological Resources - Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through X habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other X sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands X as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? FEBRUARY 2013 16 INITIAL STUDY — 219 BEAN AVENUE 4a, 4b, 4c, 4d. Special - Status Species, Sensitive Communities and Wetlands, Fish and Wildlife Movement, Corridors, Nursery Sites The project site is located in the downtown area of Los Gatos and comprises 4.18 acres of institutional uses, including a church, school and administrative buildings, and ancillary structures. The site contains 10 buildings with extensive areas paved as play /parking facilities. Vegetation on the property is limited to landscaping on the perimeter of site and around buildings. A turf- covered sports field is situated in the southwest corner of the site. The habitat value of site vegetation is limited to urban- adapted species. There are no federally protected wetlands, riparian habitat, or other sensitive natural communities, nor are there any fish or wildlife migratory corridors or nursery sites on the site or in its vicinity. 4e. Tree Protection Ordinance The Town of Los Gatos' Tree Protection Ordinance (Section 29.10.0950 — 29.10.1045 of the Zoning Ordinance) prohibits the removal of any protected tree without first obtaining a permit. The intent of the Tree Ordinance is to "preserve the scenic beauty" of the Town of Los Gatos by maintaining existing trees and to replace trees when they are removed. Under the Tree Ordinance, trees are evaluated based on their physical characteristics, but not on their biological function or eligibility for protected status under state or federal regulations. The Los Gatos Tree Protection Ordinance states that the preferred tree replacement is two or more trees of a species and size designated by the Director of the Parks and Public Works Department. Tree replacement requirements are based on canopy size, which is defined in Table 3 -1 of the Ordinance, Tree Canopy — Replacement Standard. Tree canopy replacement requirements range from two to six 24 -inch box size trees or two 36 -inch and /or 48 -inch box size trees, depending on the canopy size of the tree to be removed. A tree survey was prepared for the project by the Town's consulting arborist, Deborah Ellis, on May 1, 2012 with updates on October 17, 2012 and January 10, 2013. Copies of these studies are on file with the Los Gatos Community Development Department. The arborist's assessment and revised project plans serve as the basis for the following evaluation of the project's potential effects on trees at the property. The tree survey identified a total of 81 ordinance -size trees of various species on the project site. The majority of the site's trees are located on the western portion of the site and would be unaffected by the proposed project. The eastern part of the site contains 13 trees that potentially could be affected by the FEBRUARY 2013 17 Less Than Significant Potentially With Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Issues (and Supporting Information Sources) Impact Incorporated Impact Impact d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident X or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting X biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation X Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? 4a, 4b, 4c, 4d. Special - Status Species, Sensitive Communities and Wetlands, Fish and Wildlife Movement, Corridors, Nursery Sites The project site is located in the downtown area of Los Gatos and comprises 4.18 acres of institutional uses, including a church, school and administrative buildings, and ancillary structures. The site contains 10 buildings with extensive areas paved as play /parking facilities. Vegetation on the property is limited to landscaping on the perimeter of site and around buildings. A turf- covered sports field is situated in the southwest corner of the site. The habitat value of site vegetation is limited to urban- adapted species. There are no federally protected wetlands, riparian habitat, or other sensitive natural communities, nor are there any fish or wildlife migratory corridors or nursery sites on the site or in its vicinity. 4e. Tree Protection Ordinance The Town of Los Gatos' Tree Protection Ordinance (Section 29.10.0950 — 29.10.1045 of the Zoning Ordinance) prohibits the removal of any protected tree without first obtaining a permit. The intent of the Tree Ordinance is to "preserve the scenic beauty" of the Town of Los Gatos by maintaining existing trees and to replace trees when they are removed. Under the Tree Ordinance, trees are evaluated based on their physical characteristics, but not on their biological function or eligibility for protected status under state or federal regulations. The Los Gatos Tree Protection Ordinance states that the preferred tree replacement is two or more trees of a species and size designated by the Director of the Parks and Public Works Department. Tree replacement requirements are based on canopy size, which is defined in Table 3 -1 of the Ordinance, Tree Canopy — Replacement Standard. Tree canopy replacement requirements range from two to six 24 -inch box size trees or two 36 -inch and /or 48 -inch box size trees, depending on the canopy size of the tree to be removed. A tree survey was prepared for the project by the Town's consulting arborist, Deborah Ellis, on May 1, 2012 with updates on October 17, 2012 and January 10, 2013. Copies of these studies are on file with the Los Gatos Community Development Department. The arborist's assessment and revised project plans serve as the basis for the following evaluation of the project's potential effects on trees at the property. The tree survey identified a total of 81 ordinance -size trees of various species on the project site. The majority of the site's trees are located on the western portion of the site and would be unaffected by the proposed project. The eastern part of the site contains 13 trees that potentially could be affected by the FEBRUARY 2013 17 INITIAL STUDY — 219 BEAN AVENUE development plans for the school facilities. Review of the arborist's evaluations and consultation with the applicant's project planning team has resulted in the determination that three trees ( #'s 62, 64, and 81) would be removed; the project design modifications permit the retention of three additional trees ( #'s 58, 59, and 69) that possibly would have required removal for project implementation. As a result, tree removal proposed by the project would be limited to the three trees (3.7% of total site trees) described above. The project's proposed Landscape Plan indicates that 21 trees would be planted to replace the three removed trees. Subject to the approval of the Town, this level of tree replacement would be consistent with the requirement of the Tree Protection Ordinance. With required conformance to the Town's Tree Protection Ordinance, the project would not conflict with any local ordinances or policies protecting trees. 4f. Habitat Conservation Plans The proposed project would not be in conflict with any approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan. 5a. Historical Resources Project implementation would result in demolition of an existing building (59 Victory Lane) on the site. This building does not meet Town standards and guidelines for historical resources: (1) the project site is not located within an historic district; (2) the site and site structures do not have historical designations; and (3) structures on the site were constructed after 1941 and have no architectural or historic significance. Therefore, no significant impacts on historic resources would result from the proposed demolition. 5b, 5d. Archaeological Resources and Human Remains The project site is already developed and surface soils were disturbed during construction of the church, . school, administrative buildings, and play /parking area on the subject property. Although the site is not located adjacent to Los Gatos Creek, the potential for encountering cultural resources cannot be completely eliminated due to the site's proximity to the creek (approximately 1,000 feet) and relatively level topography. The lack of recorded prehistoric archaeological sites may be due to the relatively early historic buildout of this area, which precluded the systematic search for archaeological resources that may have been associated with the riparian zone of Los Gatos Creek, which is located less than 1,000 feet to the east of the project area. This riparian zone would have been an ideal habitation location for Native Americans, FEBRUARY 2013 18 Less Than Significant Potentially With Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Issues (and Supporting Information Sources) Impact Incorporated Impact Impact 5. Cultural Resources- Would the project: a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a X historical resource as defined in 15064.5? b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an X archaeological resource pursuant to 15064.5? c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource X or site or unique geologic feature? d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of X formal cemeteries? 5a. Historical Resources Project implementation would result in demolition of an existing building (59 Victory Lane) on the site. This building does not meet Town standards and guidelines for historical resources: (1) the project site is not located within an historic district; (2) the site and site structures do not have historical designations; and (3) structures on the site were constructed after 1941 and have no architectural or historic significance. Therefore, no significant impacts on historic resources would result from the proposed demolition. 5b, 5d. Archaeological Resources and Human Remains The project site is already developed and surface soils were disturbed during construction of the church, . school, administrative buildings, and play /parking area on the subject property. Although the site is not located adjacent to Los Gatos Creek, the potential for encountering cultural resources cannot be completely eliminated due to the site's proximity to the creek (approximately 1,000 feet) and relatively level topography. The lack of recorded prehistoric archaeological sites may be due to the relatively early historic buildout of this area, which precluded the systematic search for archaeological resources that may have been associated with the riparian zone of Los Gatos Creek, which is located less than 1,000 feet to the east of the project area. This riparian zone would have been an ideal habitation location for Native Americans, FEBRUARY 2013 18 INITIAL STUDY — 219 BEAN AVENUE { who utilized the food resources and availability of water during their annual movements between numerous seasonal villages and campsites in the Santa Clara Valley. Archaeological resources have been recorded at several locations north of the Vasona Reservoir and along adjacent watercourses found in nearby San Jose; their presence suggests that the project area has a moderate potential for containing archaeological resources under the paving and buildings currently covering the site. Since almost the entire site is covered with buildings or pavement, a visual inspection of the site was not possible, but the potential for discovery of obscured cultural resources during future development of the project site would still remain, a potentially significant impact. However, implementation of Mitigation Measures CUL -1 through CUL -5 would reduce this impact to a less -than- significant impact. 5c. Paleontological Resources Paleontological resources are the fossilized remains of plants and animals, including vertebrates (animals with backbones), invertebrates (e.g., starfish, clams, ammonites, and marine coral), and fossils of microscopic plants and animals (microfossils). The age and abundance of fossils depend on the location, topographic setting, and particular geologic formation in which they are found. Fossil discoveries not only provide a historic record of past plant and animal life, but may assist geologists in dating rock formations. A review of records maintained by the University of California Museum of Paleontology in Berkeley indicates that the closest paleontological resources recorded in Santa Clara County occur approximately 15.5 miles west of Los Gatos. These resources were discovered in geologic strata dating from the Late Pliocene and Miocene epochs of the Tertiary Period (65 to 1.8 million years ago). Geologic mapping2 for the proposed project indicates the site is underlain by Pleistocene alluvial fan deposits. These deposits are more recent and differ in age from those containing the recorded paleontological resources. Consequently, the potential for encountering paleontological resources at the project site is considered to be low. Mitigation Measures — Cultural Resources (CUL) The following measures shall be implemented by the project applicant to reduce the project's potential impact on archaeological resources to a less -than- significant level: CUL -1: Alert Construction Personnel. Construction personnel involved with earthmoving shall be alerted to the potential for the discovery of prehistoric materials and in particular, concentrations of historic artifacts. Prehistoric archaeological resources could include but not be limited to the following: darker than surrounding soils of a friable nature, concentrations of stone, bone or fresh water shellfish, artifacts of these materials, and evidence of fire (ash, charcoal, fire altered earth or rock) and of course, burials, both human and animal. CUL -2: Halt of Construction If Archaeological Traces Are Encountered. In the event that archaeological traces are encountered, all construction within a 20 foot radius of the find shall be halted, the Community Development Director shall be notified, and an archaeologist shall be retained to examine the find and make appropriate recommendations. CUL 3: Plan for Eligible Resources. In the event that it appears further earthmoving will affect a resource eligible for the California Register of Historic Resource (CRHR), a plan for evaluation of the resource through limited hand excavation should be submitted to the Town's Community Development Department for approval. If evaluative testing demonstrates that the project will affect a CRHR eligible resource, a plan for the mitigation of impacts to the resource should be submitted to the Community Development Department for approval before construction is allowed inside the zone designated as archaeologically sensitive. z AMEC Geomatrix, Peer Review — Geotechnical Investigation Report and Plan, August 19, 2010. FEBRUARY 2013 19 INITIAL STUDY — 219 BEAN AVENUE CUL -4: Preliminary Archaeological Report. If the Community Development Director finds that the archaeological find is not a significant resource, work will resume only after the submittal of a preliminary archaeological report and after provisions for reburial and ongoing monitoring are accepted. Provisions for identifying descendants of a deceased Native American and for reburial will follow the protocol set forth in CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5(e). If the site is found to be a significant archaeological site, a mitigation program will be prepared and submitted to the Community Development Director for consideration and approval, in conformance with the protocol set forth in Public Resources Code Section 21083.2. CUL -5: Final Archaeological Report. A final report shall be prepared when a find is determined to be a significant archaeological site, and /or when Native American remains are found on the site. The final report will include background information on the completed work, a description and list of identified resources, the disposition and curation of these resources, any testing, other recovered information, and conclusions. 6a — 6h. Geologic, Soils, and Seismic Hazards A review of the Town's hazards maps' indicates that the project site has a moderate to high potential for fault rupture, negligible slope stability hazard, moderate potential for seismic shaking, moderate shrink- s Nolan Associates, 1999. Draft Erosion Potential Map, Shrink -Swell Potential of Soils, Slope Stability Hazard Map, Debris Flow Hazard Map, Liquefaction Hazard Zones Map, Seismic Shaking Hazards Map, Geologic Map, Fault Rupture Hazard Zones Map for the Town of Los Gatos General Plan Update. January 17. FEBRUARY 2013 20 Less Than Significant Potentially With Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Issues (and Supporting Information Sources) Impact Incorporated Impact Impact 6. Geology and Soils - Would the project expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: a) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most X recent Alquist- Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. b) Strong seismic ground shaking? X c) Seismic - related ground failure, including liquefaction? X d) Landslides? X e) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? X f) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that X would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off -site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? g) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18 -1 -B of the X Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property? h) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic X tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater? 6a — 6h. Geologic, Soils, and Seismic Hazards A review of the Town's hazards maps' indicates that the project site has a moderate to high potential for fault rupture, negligible slope stability hazard, moderate potential for seismic shaking, moderate shrink- s Nolan Associates, 1999. Draft Erosion Potential Map, Shrink -Swell Potential of Soils, Slope Stability Hazard Map, Debris Flow Hazard Map, Liquefaction Hazard Zones Map, Seismic Shaking Hazards Map, Geologic Map, Fault Rupture Hazard Zones Map for the Town of Los Gatos General Plan Update. January 17. FEBRUARY 2013 20 INITIAL STUDY — 219 BEAN AVENUE swell potential, low potential for liquefaction, slight to moderate erosion hazard, and no debris flow hazards. The Town's Fault Map indicates that the site is located approximately 300 feet south of an area mapped as Concentration of Coseismic Ground Deformation where linear depressions indicative of faulting are present. a At a minimum, the proposed Junior High School Building would be expected to be subject to strong groundshaking during its design life. However, it should be noted that most of the Bay Area as well as surrounding residences are subject to groundshaking hazards. As a standard project condition, the Town will require preparation of a soil engineering report; this report will address any soil engineering constraints and specify criteria and standards in accordance with the Uniform Building Code (UBC) for site grading, drainage, pavement design, retaining wall design, erosion control, and foundation design. UBC standards account for a development's vulnerability to seismic hazards based on its proximity to active faults and Los Gatos utilizes a different section of the UBC seismic table due its proximity to Class B faults. Therefore, compliance with applicable UBC requirements would be adequate to address regional seismic safety concerns such as groundshaking. Assuming all recommendations of the required report are incorporated into the project design, no significant impacts from soil engineering constraints would be anticipated. "Greenhouse gases" (so called because of their role in trapping heat near the surface of the earth) emitted by human activity are implicated in global climate change, commonly referred to as "global warming." 'These greenhouse gases contribute to an increase in the temperature of the earth's atmosphere by transparency to short wavelength visible sunlight, but near opacity to outgoing terrestrial long wavelength heat radiation. The principal greenhouse gases (GHGs) are carbon dioxide, methane, nitrous oxide, ozone, and water vapor. Fossil fuel consumption in the transportation sector (on -road motor vehicles, off - highway mobile sources, and aircraft) is the single largest source of GHG emissions, accounting for approximately half of GHG emissions globally. Industrial and commercial sources are the second largest contributors of GHG emissions with about one- fourth of total emissions. Significance Criteria. Exercising its own discretion as lead agency and similar to other San Francisco Bay Area jurisdictions, the Town of Los Gatos has decided to rely on the thresholds within the Options and Justification Report (dated October 2009) prepared by the BAAQMD. The BAAQMD Options and Justification Report establishes thresholds based on substantial evidence and are consistent with the thresholds outlined within the BAAQMD's 2011 CEQA Air Quality Guidelines. Although BAAQMD failed to comply with CEQA before completing its 2010 recommendations, Town staff believes that these recommendations still represent the best available science on the subject of what constitutes significant GHG effects on climate change and they are as follows: a Nolan Associates, 1999. Draft Fault, Lineament & Coseismic Deformation Allap for the Town of Los Gatos General Plan Update. January 17. FEBRUARY 2013 21 Less than Significant Potentially Impact With Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Issues (and Supporting Information Sources) Impact Incorporated Impact Impact 7. Greenhouse Gases - Would the project: a) Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, X that may have a significant impact on the environment, based on any applicable threshold of significance? b) Conflict with any applicable plan, policy or regulation of an X agency adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases? "Greenhouse gases" (so called because of their role in trapping heat near the surface of the earth) emitted by human activity are implicated in global climate change, commonly referred to as "global warming." 'These greenhouse gases contribute to an increase in the temperature of the earth's atmosphere by transparency to short wavelength visible sunlight, but near opacity to outgoing terrestrial long wavelength heat radiation. The principal greenhouse gases (GHGs) are carbon dioxide, methane, nitrous oxide, ozone, and water vapor. Fossil fuel consumption in the transportation sector (on -road motor vehicles, off - highway mobile sources, and aircraft) is the single largest source of GHG emissions, accounting for approximately half of GHG emissions globally. Industrial and commercial sources are the second largest contributors of GHG emissions with about one- fourth of total emissions. Significance Criteria. Exercising its own discretion as lead agency and similar to other San Francisco Bay Area jurisdictions, the Town of Los Gatos has decided to rely on the thresholds within the Options and Justification Report (dated October 2009) prepared by the BAAQMD. The BAAQMD Options and Justification Report establishes thresholds based on substantial evidence and are consistent with the thresholds outlined within the BAAQMD's 2011 CEQA Air Quality Guidelines. Although BAAQMD failed to comply with CEQA before completing its 2010 recommendations, Town staff believes that these recommendations still represent the best available science on the subject of what constitutes significant GHG effects on climate change and they are as follows: a Nolan Associates, 1999. Draft Fault, Lineament & Coseismic Deformation Allap for the Town of Los Gatos General Plan Update. January 17. FEBRUARY 2013 21 INITIAL STUDY — 219 BEAN AVENUE ■ Compliance with a Qualified Climate Action Plan (or similar adopted policies, ordinances, and programs) that includes enforceable measures to reduce GHG emissions consistent with AB 32 goals or Executive Order S -03 -05 targets; OR ■ 1,100 MT CO2e per year OR ■ 6.7 MT CO2e per capita per year (residential) / 4.6 MT CO2e per service population per year (mixed use) For purposes of this report, project compliance with the 1,100 MT CO2e /year threshold is used as the primary basis to determine significance. The project's consistency with operative goals and policies of the Sustainability Plan that are designed to avoid environmental impacts also is analyzed as a secondary basis for assessing significance. To fully implement the Sustainability Plan, though, the Town Council must take a number of future steps, such as adopting a Green Building Ordinance and developing GreenPoint Rated Building Guidelines. Consistency of any proposed project or program with the Sustainability Plan is one of the criteria used to determine the significance of a project's GHG emissions under CEQA. Because many of the Plan's most stringent aspects will only become fully operational when such future measures are in place, however, compliance with existing Sustainability Plan requirements, by itself, is not sufficient at this time to support a determination that a project's greenhouse gas emissions are less than significant by definition. Although the Plan contains a comprehensive long -range strategy to achieve sustainability in transportation, land use, energy conservation, water use, solid waste reduction and open space preservation, the Plan will not be fully implemented until the Town Council takes a number of future steps, such as adopting a Green Building Ordinance and developing GreenPoint Rated Building Guidelines. When these steps have been taken, the Town intends that compliance with the Plan and its implementing actions (e.g., the Green Building Ordinance) should be sufficient by itself to reduce projects' greenhouse gas emissions to less than significant levels. (See CEQA Section 15183.5 [compliance with the requirements of a plan to reduce greenhouse gas emissions may be sufficient to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions from individual projects to less - than - significant levels].) 7a. Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions Short -term GHG emissions would be generated by project - related construction activities. The BAAQMD does not have a quantitative significance threshold for construction- related GHG emissions, but the project's construction - related GHG emissions are expected to have a less -than- significant impact on global climate change. GHG modeling completed for this project indicates that project construction would generate up to approximately 173 metric tons of CO2- equivalents (MT CO2e) per year .5 For comparison purposes, this emissions rate is well below this report's operational threshold of 1,100 metric tons (MT) Of CO2e per year, which would be an indication that the project's construction- related GHG emissions would be less than significant. The proposed project would also be subject to the existing CARB regulation (Title 13 of the California Code of Regulations, Section 2485), which limits idling of diesel - fueled commercial motor vehicles, and compliance with this regulation would further reduce GHG emissions associated with project construction vehicles (compliance with idling limits is required under Mitigation Measure AQ -1 in Section 3, Air Quality). The BAAQMD also encourages implementation of construction - related GHG reduction strategies where feasible, such as: using alternative- fueled (e.g., s Because of the differential heat absorption potential of various GHGs, GHG emissions are frequently measured in "carbon dioxide - equivalents" or COZe, which present a weighted average based on each gas's heat absorption (or "global warming ") potential. When CO, and non -COZ GHG emissions are considered together, they are referenced as COZe, which add approximately 0,9 percent to CO, emissions from diesel equipment exhaust (California Climate Action Registry, General Reporting Protocol, Version 3.1, January 2009. Available online at: http / /www.climatei- g stry.orr /t� ools /protocols /general- rejportin_g- _notocoI tml. Accessed on June 14, 2011). See Attachment 3 for other construction assumptions. FEBRUARY 2013 22 INITIAL STUDY — 219 BEAN AVENUE biodiesel, electric) construction vehicles /equipment such that these vehicles /equipment comprise at least 15 percent of the fleet; using local building materials such that these materials comprise at least 10 percent of all construction materials; and recycling or reusing at least 50 percent of construction waste or demolition materials. None of these measures is specifically proposed as part of the project. The CalEEMod 2011.1.1 computer model was used to calculate GHG emissions that would be generated by the proposed addition of 50 students and a net addition of 9,565 s.f. of space at the school. The proposed project is estimated to generate approximately 88 MT CO2e per year (Table 4). Such an increase would not exceed this report's significance threshold of 1,100 MT CO2e per year. Therefore, the project's operational GHG emissions would be less than significant. TABLE 4 PROJECT - RELATED OPERATIONAL GHG EMISSIONS GHG Source Project MT COZe /year Construction Emissions (2013) 173.7 Operational Emissions - Energy 26.74 - Mobile 56.40 - Waste 4.15 - Water 0.62 Total 87.91 Town CEQA Threshold <1,100 MT CO2e SOURCE: CalEEMod Output (see Attachment 3) 7b. Greenhouse Gas Reduction Plans, Policies, and Regulations California has passed several bills and the Governor has signed at least three executive orders regarding greenhouse gases. The Governor's Office of Planning and Research is in the process of developing CEQA significance thresholds for GHG emissions but thresholds have yet to be established. GHG statutes and executive orders (EO) include EO S -1 -07, EO S -3 -05, EO S- 13 -08, EO S- 14 -08, EO S- 20 -04, EO S- 21 -09, AB 32, AB 341, AB 1493, AB 3018, SB 97, S13375, SB 1078 and 107, SB 1368, and SB X12. AB 32 establishes regulatory, reporting, and market mechanisms to reduce statewide GHG emissions to 1990 levels by 2020. Pursuant to this requirement, the California Air Resources Board (CARB) adopted its Scoping Plan, which contains the main strategies to achieve required reductions by 2020. As indicated above, the project's construction- related and operational GHG emissions would not exceed this report's significance threshold of 1,100 MT. This threshold is based on the BAAQMD's 2011 CEQA Air Quality Guidelines, which in turn, relates to AB 32 GHG reduction goals. Therefore, the project's GHG emissions would not conflict with plans and policies adopted for the purpose of reducing GHG emissions, a less -than- significant impact. In October 2012, the Town of Los Gatos adopted a Sustainability Plan, which outlines communitywide GHG emission reduction measures necessary to reduce GHG emissions in Los Gatos. By 2020, the Sustainability Plan documents that GHG emissions will be reduced by approximately 15% from the business -as -usual (BAU) assumption. The emissions reductions vary by sector. The Sustainability Plan contains GHG reduction measures and implements goals and policies of the Environment and Sustainability Element of the General Plan. In general, the proposed project would be consistent with FEBRUARY 2013 23 INITIAL STUDY — 219 BEAN AVENUE currently applicable Sustainability Plan GHG reduction measures and associated General Plan policies. Project consistency with these policies is discussed in the following project consistency analysis table. Sustainability Plan GHG Reduction Measures Project Consistency Analysis Transportation and Land Use TR -1: Support for Pedestrians, Bicyclists, and Transit. Promote walking, bicycling, and transit through the following: b. Require new projects, excluding single-family homes, to include pedestrian or bicycle through - connections to existing sidewalks and existing or future bicycle facilities, unless prohibited by topographical conditions. c. Seek grant funding to establish a Safe Routes to School (SR2S) Program to increase more student walking and biking trips. The program may include: conducting school walking audits, improving nearby pedestrian and bicycle facilities, implementing nearby traffic- calming, implementing school bus, vanpool, and carpools to school, implementing walking buses to schools, coordinating school schedules to not overlap with peak commute times, conducting traffic studies for specific schools for more efficient drop -off and pick -up activity at schools (e.g. staggered schedules, changing on- street parking to loading zones, and more), and increasing speed enforcement around schools. e. Implement transit access improvements through sidewalk /crosswalk safety enhancements and bus shelter improvements. TR -5: School Pool Program. Implement a School Pool Program that helps match parents to carpool students to school. TR -7: Student Transit Outreach. Coordinate with local school districts on marketing, promoting, and educating students about the benefits of using public transit as a mode of travel. TR -8: Vehicle Circulation, Parking, and Idling Reduction Programs. Reduce vehicle circulation associated with parking and reduce vehicle idling through the following: e. Encourage non - profit and volunteer organizations in conducting outreach to reduce car idling around schools during pick -up and drop -off times. Green Building Measures GB -4: Solar Orientation. Require measures that reduce energy use through solar orientation by taking advantage of shade, prevailing winds, landscaping, and sun screens. The school encourages ridesharing but does not have a formal TDM program. There are existing sidewalks along streets providing access to the closest bus stop on West Main Street near North Santa Cruz Avenue (Bus Line 48) and there are paved, Class III bike routes are proposed in the 2020 General Plan on West Main Street, and they extend both west and east of the school. As a condition of project approval, the Town will require provision of bicycle parking facilities. Because the Town has not yet implemented a Safe Routes to School Program or a School Pool Program, the applicant does not yet have the opportunity to participate in any such programs. There are existing sidewalks along streets providing access to the closest bus stop, which is located 02 mile away on West Main Street near North Santa Cruz Avenue (Bus Line 48). The school's downtown location provides the opportunity for students to utilize transit service. Because the Town has not yet implemented any Vehicle Circulation, Parking, and Idling Reduction Programs, the applicant does not yet have the opportunity to participate in any such programs. . Project plans indicate that windows would be located on mostly on the west side, which would allow natural light into classrooms and metal sunshades are proposed over the windows to shield some direct sunlight and reduce interior temperatures. FEBRUARY 2013 24 INITIAL STUDY — 219 BEAN AVENUE Sustainability Plan GHG Reduction Measures Project Consistency Analysis Renewable Energy and Low Carbon Fuels Measures Because the Town has not yet implemented any RE -6 Solar Energy Systems at Schools - Work with the program to work with school districts to install solar local school districts to encourage the use of solar energy systems and the Town could expand this energy systems at school facilities. program to private schools in the future, the applicant does not yet have the opportunity to participate in any such program. Given the proximity transit facilities, to the school, presence of bicycle and pedestrian facilities in the school vicinity, less- than - significant increase in GHG emissions, and the project's consistency with the above GHG reduction measures, the proposed project would not hinder the state's GHG reduction goals established by AB 32, a less- than - significant impact. 8a — 8g. Transport, Use, or Disposal of Hazardous Materials, Release of or Exposure to Hazardous Materials, Hazardous Emissions or Use of Extremely Hazardous Materials within 1/ -mile of a School, Airports /Airstrips, Emergency Plans, Wildland Fire Hazards FEBRUARY 2013 25 Less Than Significant Potentially With Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Issues (and Supporting Information Sources) hnpact Incorporated Impact Impact 8. Hazards and Hazardous Materials - Would the project: a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous X materials? b) Create asignificant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions X involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one - quarter mile X of an existing or proposed school? d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section X 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public X airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in X the project area? g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted X emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are X adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? 8a — 8g. Transport, Use, or Disposal of Hazardous Materials, Release of or Exposure to Hazardous Materials, Hazardous Emissions or Use of Extremely Hazardous Materials within 1/ -mile of a School, Airports /Airstrips, Emergency Plans, Wildland Fire Hazards FEBRUARY 2013 25 INITIAL STUDY — 219 BEAN AVENUE The project site is not included on any Hazardous Wastes and Substances Sites. List The 59 Victory Lane and Cougar's Corner buildings and ancillary facilities are proposed to be demolished as part of the project. If these buildings contain asbestos or lead- containing paint, demolition could result in airborne release of hazardous building materials, such as asbestos fibers or lead dust. Proposed demolition would be required to comply with state and federal regulations for inspection and removal of hazardous building materials, including asbestos - containing materials and lead - containing substances. If found to be present in building materials to be removed, asbestos and /or lead abatement practices such as containment and removal would be required prior to demolition or renovation. In addition, the project applicant will be required to obtain clearance for asbestos removal from the Bay Area Air Quality Management District prior to issuance of a demolition permit. Therefore, due to existing regulations, the potential for public health hazards associated with the release of airborne asbestos fibers at the project site would be considered less than significant. Implementation of Mitigation Measure HAZ -1 would be required to reduce potential health hazards associated with lead -based paints to a less -than- significant level. Mitigation Measures — Hazards (HAZ) In addition to implementing asbestos abatement requirements, the project applicant will implement the following additional measure to mitigate other public health risks associated with lead -based paints to a less -than- significant level: HAZ -1; Abatement of Lead -Based Paints. Prior to proposed building demolition, construction finish materials that are suspect for containing lead -based paint will be tested, and pending laboratory analysis, will not be subjected to any process which renders them friable unless proper engineering controls and worker protection procedures are initiated. 'Review of Envirostor Database of Hazardous Waste Sites and Geotracker Database of LUST and LUFT Sites maintained by the California Department of Toxic Substances Control and California State Waterboard, respectively, December 29, 2012. FEBRUARY 2013 26 Less Than Significant Potentially With Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Issues (and Supporting Information Sources) Impact Incorporated Impact Impact 9. Hydrology and Water Quality - Would the project: a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge X requirements? b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere X substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre- existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, X including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off -site? 'Review of Envirostor Database of Hazardous Waste Sites and Geotracker Database of LUST and LUFT Sites maintained by the California Department of Toxic Substances Control and California State Waterboard, respectively, December 29, 2012. FEBRUARY 2013 26 INITIAL STUDY — 219 BEAN AVENUE The project site is located in the urbanized, storm - sewered Downtown area of Los Gatos, in the Los Gatos Creek watershed. Storm drains in the area discharge into Los Gatos Creek, and this creek flows through Campbell and San Jose, joining Guadalupe River approximately seven miles downstream of the project site. Stream flows ultimately discharge into San Francisco Bay via Alviso Slough, Los Gatos Creek is a Santa Clara Valley Water District (SCVWD) water management facility, and flows into Vasona Reservoir and then several percolation basins in San Jose prior to joining the Guadalupe River. 9a, 9f. Water Quality The Federal National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Program regulates water quality degradation. This program was established by the Clean Water Act to control and reduce pollutants carried to water bodies from point and non -point discharges. In California, the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) administers the NPDES permitting program through nine Regional Water Quality Control Boards (RWQCB). The NPDES permit for the Town of Los Gatos is a permit that is issued to the Santa Clara Valley Urban Runoff Pollution Prevention Program ( SCVURPPP), an association of thirteen cities /towns in the Santa Clara Valley (including Los Gatos), Santa Clara County, and the Santa Clara Valley Water District. SCVURPPP participants share a common NPDES permit to discharge stormwater to South San Francisco Bay. To reduce pollution in urban runoff to the "maximum" extent practicable, the SCVURPP incorporates regulatory, monitoring, and outreach measures aimed at improving the water quality of South San Francisco Bay and the streams of Santa Clara Valley. The development plans for the project would demolish and replace existing school facilities with a new classroom building (Junior High School Building) and renovate existing classroom facilities. The current site use includes 134,484 s.f. (3.09 ac.) of impervious surface on the 182,081 s.f. (4.18 ac.) property, constituting approximately 74 percent of the site surface. The proposed project would replace existing impervious surface area with 24,710 s.f. (0.57 ac.) of new and replacement impervious surface; approximately 2,650 s.f. of this amount of impervious surface would be new, additional impervious FEBRUARY 2013 27 Less Than Significant Potentially With Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Issues (and Supporting Information Sources) Impact Incorporated Impact Impact d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, X including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner, which would result in flooding on- or off -site? e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the X capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? X g) Place housing within a 100 -year flood hazard area as mapped on X a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? h) Place within a 100 -year flood hazard area structures, which X would impede or redirect flood flows? i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or X death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? X The project site is located in the urbanized, storm - sewered Downtown area of Los Gatos, in the Los Gatos Creek watershed. Storm drains in the area discharge into Los Gatos Creek, and this creek flows through Campbell and San Jose, joining Guadalupe River approximately seven miles downstream of the project site. Stream flows ultimately discharge into San Francisco Bay via Alviso Slough, Los Gatos Creek is a Santa Clara Valley Water District (SCVWD) water management facility, and flows into Vasona Reservoir and then several percolation basins in San Jose prior to joining the Guadalupe River. 9a, 9f. Water Quality The Federal National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Program regulates water quality degradation. This program was established by the Clean Water Act to control and reduce pollutants carried to water bodies from point and non -point discharges. In California, the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) administers the NPDES permitting program through nine Regional Water Quality Control Boards (RWQCB). The NPDES permit for the Town of Los Gatos is a permit that is issued to the Santa Clara Valley Urban Runoff Pollution Prevention Program ( SCVURPPP), an association of thirteen cities /towns in the Santa Clara Valley (including Los Gatos), Santa Clara County, and the Santa Clara Valley Water District. SCVURPPP participants share a common NPDES permit to discharge stormwater to South San Francisco Bay. To reduce pollution in urban runoff to the "maximum" extent practicable, the SCVURPP incorporates regulatory, monitoring, and outreach measures aimed at improving the water quality of South San Francisco Bay and the streams of Santa Clara Valley. The development plans for the project would demolish and replace existing school facilities with a new classroom building (Junior High School Building) and renovate existing classroom facilities. The current site use includes 134,484 s.f. (3.09 ac.) of impervious surface on the 182,081 s.f. (4.18 ac.) property, constituting approximately 74 percent of the site surface. The proposed project would replace existing impervious surface area with 24,710 s.f. (0.57 ac.) of new and replacement impervious surface; approximately 2,650 s.f. of this amount of impervious surface would be new, additional impervious FEBRUARY 2013 27 INITIAL STUDY - 219 BEAN AVENUE surface. This would represent approximately 1.4 percent of the total site area. Total post - project impervious surface area would be 137,134 s.f., approximately 75 percent of total project site area. The construction proposed by the project plans would be a potential source for erosion and downstream sedimentation if soil materials exposed during project construction were accidentally released. Consequently, the project's construction activities would have the potential to degrade local water quality in Los Gatos Creek. As stipulated for Regulated Projects under the NPDES permit provisions, the proposed development would remove and replace more than 10,000 s.f. of impervious area and must implement design, control, and engineered treatment measures. For the purposes of stormwater management and water quality control, project plans include a conceptual stormwater management plan that identifies proposed pervious and impervious surfaces, disposition of anticipated runoff volumes, and stormwater treatment methods to safeguard water quality in site runoff. Stormwater treatment regulations effective December 1, 2011 require that each Regulated Project treat 100 percent of the design storm runoff from a project's drainage area with low impact development (LID) treatment measures onsite or at a joint stormwater treatment facility. LID measures include Rainwater Harvesting, Infiltration, Evapotranspiration, and Biotreatment (if prior LID measures are determined to be infeasible). Beginning December 1, 2011, projects submitted for Planning approval that create or replace 10,000 square feet of impervious surface ("Regulated Projects ") are subject to LID treatment requirements. Future Architecture and Site approvals for this project will be subject to the LID requirements if approved after December 1, 2011. Projects which disturb one or more acres of soil, or projects which disturb less than one acre but are part of a larger common plan of development that in total disturbs one or more acres, are required to obtain coverage under the General Permit for Discharges of Storm Water Associated with Construction Activity. Since the area disturbed during construction is less than one acre, the project would not be required to obtain coverage under the State's General Permit for Storm Water Discharges Associated with Construction Activity. The State Regional Water Quality Control Board implemented a new General Construction Permit (Order 2009- 0009 -DWQ), which became effective July 1, 2010. Implementation of the Town- approved SWPPP and additional monitoring and reporting requirements specified in the General Construction Permit during project construction would ensure that potential construction - related water quality impacts would be less than significant. To ensure compliance with stormwater treatment and disposal requirements, the Town's contract engineering consultant, Eisenberg, Olivieri & Associates (EOA), reviewed drainage and stormwater management plans submitted to the Town. The final EOA review was conducted in February 2013 (included as Attachment 4). The review of the project submittals for compliance with the Town of Los Gatos' NPDES Permit indicate that the conceptual stormwater treatment measures proposed for the project appear to be adequate to meet the Town's NPDES Permit Provision C.3 requirements. The EOA memorandum also makes three recommendations with respect to the project's stormwater management plans. These include: • Approval of the project's Stormwater Management Plan; • Compliance with landscaping provisions of the SCVURPPP C.3 Stormwater Handbook; and • Maintenance of the biotreatment pond and source control measures by the project applicant. The Town will incorporate these provisions as conditions of approval for the project. 9b. Groundwater Resources The proposed project would replace and add impervious surfaces to the subject property located in the urbanized Downtown area of Los Gatos. The project would not deplete groundwater supplies or interfere FEBRUARY 2013 28 INITIAL STUDY — 219 BEAN AVENUE substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre - existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted. The project's plans for an on -site biotreatment pond would further promote on -site infiltration of storm runoff collected from project impervious surfaces. 9e, 9d, 9e. Drainage Elevations on the site range from approximately 422 feet above mean sea level (MSL) at the southwest corner of the property to a low of about 408 feet at the northeast corner of the property. The site generally consists of an extensive, level area that slopes gently to the northeast. The project site is developed with several structures associated with the church and school services on the project site. Extensive paving for driveway and parking along with these buildings cover approximately 74 percent of the 4.18 -acre site. Storm drainage from the site's impervious surfaces is collected in the on -site storm drain system and conveyed to the municipal storm drain system (18 -inch storm drain) in Bean Avenue, adjoining the northern perimeter of the project site. Presently, runoff flows from the project site are not treated for the removal of urban pollutants and water contaminants. As described above, impervious surfaces on the property cover approximately 3.09 acres of the 4.18 -acre property. The proposed project would increase the extent of impervious surface area to 3.15 acres on the site. This would represent approximately 75 percent of the total site area, resulting in a minor increase of impervious surface area on the site. The increased surface flows from the project site could be accommodated by the bioretention pond proposed as part of the project and the existing municipal storm drain facilities located in Bean Avenue, and development would have a less -than- significant impact on municipal drainage facilities. 9g, 9h, 9i, 9j. Flood Hazards According to the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) (May 18, 2009) for Los Gatos, the project site is located in Zone X, consisting of areas with 0.2% annual chance of flood, areas of one percent annual chance flood with average depths of less than one foot or with drainage areas less than one square mile, and areas protected by levees from one percent chance flood. The FEMA Flood Zones map (Figure SAF -4) of the 2020 General Plan Safety Element also indicates that the project site is located outside mapped 100 -year flood hazard areas. Mapping of dams and dam inundation areas provided by the Safety Element (Figure SAF -5) of the recent updated 2020 General Plan for the Town provides information on areas within the community that may be potentially affected by inundation from dam failure. Based on the review of this and supporting maps, the project site is not in an area designated as a dam failure inundation area. The potential for flooding hazards on the site from storm events and dam failure would be less than significant. FEBRUARY 2013 29 Less Than Significant Potentially With Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Issues (and Supporting Information Sources) Impact Incorporated Impact Impact 10. Land Use and Planning - Would the project: a) Physically divide an established community? X FEBRUARY 2013 29 INITIAL STUDY — 219 BEAN AVENUE 10a —10c. Divide an Established Community, Project Consistency with Land Use Plans and Policies, Conflict with Habitat Conservation or Natural Community Conservation Plans The Los Gatos General Plan designates the project area as "Medium Density Residential; 5 - 12 dwelling units /acre," This designation allows for residential uses at densities of 5 to 12 units per acre. The Zoning Ordinance designates the project area as "R -1D, Single Family Residential, Downtown." The existing school use is allowed within this zone with a Conditional Use Permit (CUP). Proposed changes to the operations would not alter the type of use allowed on this site, but would alter the level of use. Proposed operational modifications would be allowed under the existing General Plan and Zoning designations. The project would not alter the use of the school property and therefore, the project would not pose any new land use compatibility problems. However, the project would increase student enrollments, which would thereby increase the potential for land use conflicts related to increased traffic, noise, and criteria air pollutants. The effects of such increases are addressed elsewhere in this report under Sections 3, Air Quality, 12, Noise, and 16, Transportation /Traffic. The Los Gatos General Plan does not identify any habitat conservation plans or natural community conservation plans that apply to the project area. Less Than Significant Potentially With Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Issues (and Supporting Information Sources) Impact Incorporated Impact ILn act b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation X of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not X limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or X mitigating an environmental effect? c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural X community conservation plan? 10a —10c. Divide an Established Community, Project Consistency with Land Use Plans and Policies, Conflict with Habitat Conservation or Natural Community Conservation Plans The Los Gatos General Plan designates the project area as "Medium Density Residential; 5 - 12 dwelling units /acre," This designation allows for residential uses at densities of 5 to 12 units per acre. The Zoning Ordinance designates the project area as "R -1D, Single Family Residential, Downtown." The existing school use is allowed within this zone with a Conditional Use Permit (CUP). Proposed changes to the operations would not alter the type of use allowed on this site, but would alter the level of use. Proposed operational modifications would be allowed under the existing General Plan and Zoning designations. The project would not alter the use of the school property and therefore, the project would not pose any new land use compatibility problems. However, the project would increase student enrollments, which would thereby increase the potential for land use conflicts related to increased traffic, noise, and criteria air pollutants. The effects of such increases are addressed elsewhere in this report under Sections 3, Air Quality, 12, Noise, and 16, Transportation /Traffic. The Los Gatos General Plan does not identify any habitat conservation plans or natural community conservation plans that apply to the project area. 11a, 11b. Mineral Resources The Los Gatos General Plan does not identify any regionally or locally - important mineral resources' on the project site or in its vicinity. ' Town of Los Gatos 2020 General Plan Environmental Impact Report, March 10, 2010, page 4 -1. FEBRUARY 2013 30 Less Than Significant Potentially With Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Issues (and Supporting Information Sources) Hn pact Incorporated Impact Impact 11. Mineral Resources - Would the project: a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that X would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally- important mineral X resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? 11a, 11b. Mineral Resources The Los Gatos General Plan does not identify any regionally or locally - important mineral resources' on the project site or in its vicinity. ' Town of Los Gatos 2020 General Plan Environmental Impact Report, March 10, 2010, page 4 -1. FEBRUARY 2013 30 INITIAL STUDY — 219 BEAN AVENUE A detailed noise assessment study was completed by Edward L. Pack Associates, Inc, in November 20128 and is included in Attachment 5. Noise measurement and modeling data are included in Appendix C of the Pack study. Noise - Sensitive Receptors. Certain land uses are particularly sensitive to noise, including schools, hospitals, rest homes, long -term medical and mental care facilities, places of worship, and parks and recreation areas. Residential areas are also considered noise sensitive, especially during the nighttime hours. While the project site itself is considered to be a sensitive receptor with school and church facilities located on the site, existing sensitive receptors located in the project vicinity include residential uses located immediately adjacent to the project site on Bean Avenue, Tait Avenue, and West Main Street. Applicable Noise Guidelines and Standards. The Noise Element of the Los Gatos 2020 General Plan establishes goals and policies for reducing noise levels in the Town. Policies aimed at reducing noise levels must address specific sources of unwanted noise, as well as noise- sensitive receptors. The Noise Element contains guidelines for use in land use planning to reduce future noise and land use incompatibilities (Figure NOI -1 of the Noise Element). The acceptable limit for residential use is 55 decibels (dB) day -night average sound level (DNL). The Town's Noise Element (Policy NOI -1.3) states that these noise limits represent the "long range community aspirations" and acknowledges that such goals may not be attainable at this time. The acceptable limit for commercial use is 70 dBA L,s(,4), The L,q(24) is the 24 -hour average Leq, which is not time - weighted like the DNL. Because the L,q(24) noise exposures in the vicinity of the school are currently below 60 dBA, no further analysis is required of the noise impacts on commercial uses located adjacent to the school. s Edward L. Pack Associates, Inc., Noise Assessment Study for St. Mary's School, Bean Avenue, Los Gatos. November 29, 2012. FEBRUARY 2013 31 Less Than Significant Potentially With Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Issues (and Supporting Information Sources) Impact Incorporated Impact Impact 12. Noise - Would the project result in: a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of X standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive groundborne X vibration or groundborne noise levels? c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the X project vicinity above levels existing without the project? d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise X levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where X such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the X project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? A detailed noise assessment study was completed by Edward L. Pack Associates, Inc, in November 20128 and is included in Attachment 5. Noise measurement and modeling data are included in Appendix C of the Pack study. Noise - Sensitive Receptors. Certain land uses are particularly sensitive to noise, including schools, hospitals, rest homes, long -term medical and mental care facilities, places of worship, and parks and recreation areas. Residential areas are also considered noise sensitive, especially during the nighttime hours. While the project site itself is considered to be a sensitive receptor with school and church facilities located on the site, existing sensitive receptors located in the project vicinity include residential uses located immediately adjacent to the project site on Bean Avenue, Tait Avenue, and West Main Street. Applicable Noise Guidelines and Standards. The Noise Element of the Los Gatos 2020 General Plan establishes goals and policies for reducing noise levels in the Town. Policies aimed at reducing noise levels must address specific sources of unwanted noise, as well as noise- sensitive receptors. The Noise Element contains guidelines for use in land use planning to reduce future noise and land use incompatibilities (Figure NOI -1 of the Noise Element). The acceptable limit for residential use is 55 decibels (dB) day -night average sound level (DNL). The Town's Noise Element (Policy NOI -1.3) states that these noise limits represent the "long range community aspirations" and acknowledges that such goals may not be attainable at this time. The acceptable limit for commercial use is 70 dBA L,s(,4), The L,q(24) is the 24 -hour average Leq, which is not time - weighted like the DNL. Because the L,q(24) noise exposures in the vicinity of the school are currently below 60 dBA, no further analysis is required of the noise impacts on commercial uses located adjacent to the school. s Edward L. Pack Associates, Inc., Noise Assessment Study for St. Mary's School, Bean Avenue, Los Gatos. November 29, 2012. FEBRUARY 2013 31 INITIAL STUDY - 219 BEAN AVENUE The Town of Los Gatos Noise Ordinance also contains noise limits that are based on local ambient baseline noise levels that are shown on maps published by the Town and provided within the Ordinance. Noise zones were created throughout the Town with varying ambient sound level based on three periods over the 24 -hour day. The Noise Ordinance maps are provided to simplify the ambient determination process, as ambient conditions can be difficult to quantify under given circumstances. However, when the ambient can be measured, the measured value is used to supersede the map value. The ordinance limits increases in noise for residential areas to 6 dB above the ambient. With respect to the project proposal, the Noise Ordinance is applicable to mechanical equipment associated with the new or modified buildings, school operations, and construction activities. The project- generated noise exposures were evaluated against the guidelines of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). CEQA does not limit noise levels or noise exposures nor does it quantify noise exposure or noise level increases over the ambient to define noise impacts. CEQA evaluates a project as a significant noise impact if it "...causes a substantial increases in the ambient noise levels... ". The quantification of the threshold of significance is left up to the local jurisdiction. The Los Gatos General Plan Noise Element does not provide thresholds of significance in the General Plan. Therefore, the following thresholds of significance, based on CEQA case law, shall be applied at the existing residential areas to the west and north of the site where there is a potential for noise impacts. These thresholds are: • causing the DNL in existing residential areas to increase by 5 dB or more and remain below 55 dB DNL; • causing the DNL in existing residential areas to increase by 3 dB or more and, thereby, exceed 55 dB DNL; • causing the DNL in existing residential areas to increase by 1 dB or more if the current noise exposure exceeds 55 dB DNL. If the project causes any of the above three criteria to occur, the project will be considered a significant noise impact to the areas where it occurs and mitigation measures will be required. Existing Noise Levels. The primary sources of noise in the project vicinity are traffic on Bean Avenue, Tait Avenue and West Main Street, commercial traffic /activity along Victory Lane, play area noise associated with St. Mary's School, and residential noise (landscaping /gardening and construction) at the surrounding residences. To determine the existing noise environments at the most impacted residential property boundaries across Bean Avenue and at homes adjacent to the school's playfield, continuous recordings of the sound levels were made at two locations. Measurement locations are indicated on Figure 2 in Attachment 5. Measurement Location 1 was at the curb of Bean Avenue, 16 feet from the centerline of the road at the side of the home at 100 Wilder Avenue. Measurement Location 2 was at the south property line of the home at 30 Tait Avenue near the rear fagade of the home. This measurement location was used to better segregate playfield noise from traffic noise and noise from a residential construction project that was occurring across Tait Avenue. The noise recordings were made for a total period of 24 consecutive hours and included measurements during the daytime and nighttime periods of the DNL index. Noise measurements results are summarized in Tables I1 and III of Attachment 5. Because the measured noise levels represent the "existing plus project condition, the measured noise levels were adjusted to reflect "existing" conditions at the permitted student enrollment levels. As shown in these tables, "existing" noise levels were as follows: ■ 100 Wilder Avenue (closest residence to the north): 52 to 53 dB DNL at most impacted exterior area and most impacted unshielded building fagade of the home. FEBRUARY 2013 32 INITIAL STUDY — 219 BEAN AVENUE ■ 30 Tait Avenue (closest residence to the south): 55 dB DNL at most impacted exterior area and most impacted unshielded building fagade of the home. 12a. Noise Compatibility of Proposed Uses When the noise measurements presented above are compared to the above Town's noise compatibility guidelines for school uses, existing noise levels are considered acceptable for school uses. Therefore, project implementation would not pose any significant noise compatibility problems within the existing school and church operation. Existing noise exposures at the closest residential properties to the school site are considered acceptable (at or below the 55 dB DNL limit of the Noise Element). See Section 12c, Long -term Noise Increases, below for discussion of the project's noise impact on these residences. 12b. Groundborne Noise and Vibration Since construction of project facilities would not involve construction of subsurface facilities (i.e. tunnels or basements), generation of construction- related groundborne noise levels that could result in noise disturbance at the closest residential receptors would be less than significant. In addition, since project construction would not involve use of impact equipment (i.e. pile drivers), generation of construction - related groundborne vibration that could result in cosmetic damage to adjacent structures would be less than significant. In general, cosmetic or threshold damage to adjacent buildings could occur if vibrations exceeded 0.5 inches per second (in /sec) peak particle velocity (PPV).9 In general, vibration velocities from typical heavy construction equipment (used for projects similar to the proposed project) range from 0.012 to 0.352 in /sec PPV at 10 feet from the source of activity. Since heavy equipment would be operated in the vicinity of the proposed junior high school building and this building would be located more than 10 feet from adjacent structures, the effects of construction - related vibration would be less than significant. 12c. Long -term Noise Increases Significance Thresholds. The Los Gatos Noise Element specifies Outdoor Noise Limits of 55 dB DNL for residential uses, and these levels are applied as the Town's significance threshold for noise compatibility with adjacent uses. In addition, the project would be subject to noise limits specified in the Los Gatos Noise Ordinance. For residential uses, the Noise Ordinance specifies a limit of 6 decibels above the average ambient (L,,) sound level. Project - related Operational Noise Increases. Project - related noise impacts on the area surrounding the proposed school would include project- generated traffic and changes in school operations.10 Project implementation would increase the school's enrollment from 265 to 315 students, increase staff levels, modify the existing lower school building, and permit the construction of a new junior high school building, covered eating area structure, and rectory. The main playground area would mostly remain the same with the exception of one portion along Victory Lane where the existing classroom building would California Department of Transportation, 2004. Transportation- and Construction- Induced Vibration Guidance Manual. Contract No. 43A0049, Task Order No. 18. June. 10 Because the measured noise levels represent the existing + project conditions, the determination of the effect of the project on the permitted condition had to be "reversed engineered ". The permitted conditions were calculated by subtracting the project traffic increases and playground /playfield noise increases due to the increased enrollment from the measured noise levels. However, because a substantial portion of the noise environment is due to background vehicular traffic, the traffic noise exposures without the school under either "existing" or "existing + project" conditions had to be calculated. Then, the "existing" and "existing plus project" noise exposures were calculated to determine the impacts of the project on the existing (permitted) condition. See Attachment 5 for more detailed description of the adjustments made to determine "existing" and "existing plus project" noise levels. FEBRUARY 2013 33 INITIAL STUDY — 219 BEAN AVENUE be demolished and a new junior high building would be built farther to the south. A new covered lunch area would be constructed behind the small, rectory facing Bean Avenue. The playfield would remain unchanged, but the kindergarten and V grade play area (located behind the elementary school building) would be updated. School Traffic Noise Increases. Since the school is already operating with the proposed enrollment level of 315 students, traffic - related noise increases associated with the proposed increase in enrollment is already reflected in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity and along access roads. However, to determine the project's incremental noise increase, traffic noise level changes attributable to project - related traffic increases were calculated. Traffic increases on streets that provide access to the school (Bean Avenue, Tait Avenue, and West Main Street ") would result in noise increases that are well below dB, a less -than- significant increase based on the above applicable noise guidelines and standards (see Attachment 5, Section VI.A, Traffic Noise, for more detailed discussion). On Campus Operational Changes. Noise levels from proposed changes in lunch area location and design as well as increased number of students on the playground and playfield would increase noise exposure at the adjacent residential receptors. Project - related increases in noise generated on the playfield would result in short -term noise increases of less than 1 dB over existing noise levels at the residence at 30 Tait Avenue. Such increases would comply with standards of the Los Gatos Noise Ordinance. Proposed changes in school operations would result in a 1 dB DNL increase to the existing noise environment at the closest residences (100 Wilder Avenue and 30 Tait Avenue). Since noise levels are below the Los Gatos General Plan Noise Element's 55 dB DNL limit at the closest home at 100 Wilder Avenue, this 1 dB noise increase would be less than significant. However, since the existing noise exposure at the 30 Tait Avenue residence was determined to be at the 55 dB DNL limit, the project's 1 dB increase would cause ambient noise levels to exceed this limit. Therefore, project - related noise increases at this residence would be significant. It should be noted that existing sideyard fencing at this residence is a chainlink fence (not a solid fence). With implementation of Mitigation Measure NOI -1, Noise Control Barrier, ambient noise levels at the residence at 30 Tait Avenue would be reduced to less- than - significant level (below the 55 dB DNL limit). 12d. Short -Term Noise Increases Short -term noise increases would occur during demolition of the existing structures on the site and construction of new project buildings and remodeling of existing facilities. Demolition and construction equipment are typically similar, with the exception of paving equipment. Thus, the noise levels generated by these two phases would be similar over the course of the entire construction process. Demolition /construction equipment noise levels range from 68 to 100 dBA at 50 feet from the source, and would have the potential to disturb residences across Bean Avenue and along Tait Avenue. The proposed demolition of the building along Bean Avenue (Cougar's Corner) and the subsequent construction of the church- related residence would generate construction noise levels similar to those associated with typical single - family residential construction. The proposed demolition of the existing classroom building and construction of the new junior high building would occur farther from existing residential areas. The closest affected uses to this new building would be the rear facades of the commercial buildings across Victory Lane, which are mostly solid with some man -doors used for deliveries. Given these conditions and the temporary nature of construction noise, short -term construction - related noise increases are considered to be less than significant. However, given the proximity of residential uses and school use on- site, noise control measures are recommended to help reduce any potential noise impacts. " The project's incremental traffic noise increase on Lyndon Avenue would be the same as the calculated increase for West Main Street (less than 10), and also would be less than significant. FEBRUARY 2013 34 INITIAL STUDY - 219 BEAN AVENUE 12e. Airport - Related Issues The project site is not located within an airport land use plan. There is no public airport, public use airport, or private airstrip located within the Town's boundaries or within two miles of the project site. For air travel, the closest international airports are San Jose International Airport (SJC), San Francisco International Airport (SFO), and Oakland International Airport. The proposed project would not expose people residing or working in the area to excessive airport - related noise levels. Therefore, there would be no impact. Mitigation Measures — Noise (NOI) The following measures are either required to reduce project- related noise impacts to a less -than- significant level or recommended for consideration: NOI -1: Noise Control Barrier. To reduce excess noise from playfield activity at the residence at 30 Tait Avenue, the project applicant will construct a six-foot high solid board fence along the property line between the playfield and the home at 30 Tait Avenue. The barrier height is in reference to the nearest playfield ground elevation. Figure 3 of Attachment 5 delineates the location of the noise control barrier. The fence will be constructed of minimum 1 -inch thick (nom.) redwood boards nailed tight such that no gaps are visible. Cracks, gaps, knotholes are not permitted. No openings are permitted between the upper fencing components and the ground. NOI -2: Recommended Construction Measures. Although there would be no significant noise impact under CEQA or construction- related noise mitigation required under CEQA, project - related demolition and construction noise at the site could be reduced by using quiet or "new technology" equipment. The greatest potential for noise abatement of current equipment should be the quieting of exhaust noise by use of improved mufflers. It is recommended that all internal combustion engines used at the project site be equipped with a type of muffler recommended by the vehicle manufacturer. In addition, all equipment should be in good mechanical condition so as to minimize noise created by faulty or poorly maintained engine, drive -train and other components. Demolition and construction noise could also be mitigated by the following: • Schedule construction operations that comply with the limits of the Town of Los Gatos Noise Ordinance. • Limit the use of equipment close to sensitive receptor properties. • Utilizing temporary berms or noise barriers, such as lumber or other material stockpiles and the construction trailers or other non- noisy long -term structures. • Place long -term stationary equipment as far away from the residential areas as possible. • Keep mobile equipment (haul trucks, concrete trucks, etc.) off of'local streets as much as possible. A noise reduction benefit can also be achieved by appropriate selection of equipment utilized for various operations, subject to equipment availability and cost considerations, the following recommendations for minimizing impacts on the surrounding area are offered: • Earth Removal: Use scrapers as much as possible for earth removal, rather than the noisier loaders and hauling trucks. • Ground Preparation: Use a motor grader rather than a bulldozer for final grading. FEBRUARY 2013 35 INITIAL STUDY — 219 BEAN AVENUE • Building Construction: Power saws should be shielded or enclosed where practical to decrease noise emissions. Nail guns should be used where possible as they are less noisy than manual hammering. • Generators and Compressors: Use generators and compressors that are housed in acoustical enclosures rather than weather enclosures or none at all. 13a —13c. Growth- Inducement Impacts and Displacement of Housing or Residents There would be no population growth associated with the school use or resulting from proposed changes to the school's CUP. Therefore, the project would not be considered growth - inducing, particularly since the proposed changes to the CUP would limit enrollment levels to current levels. Conditions limiting the enrollment to current levels would be included as part of the Planned Development Ordinance. No housing or residents would be displaced as a result of project implementation. Less Than Significant Potentially With Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Issues (and Supporting Information Sources) Impact Incorporated Impact Impact 13. Population and Housing - Would the project: a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly X (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating X the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the X construction of replacement housing elsewhere? X 13a —13c. Growth- Inducement Impacts and Displacement of Housing or Residents There would be no population growth associated with the school use or resulting from proposed changes to the school's CUP. Therefore, the project would not be considered growth - inducing, particularly since the proposed changes to the CUP would limit enrollment levels to current levels. Conditions limiting the enrollment to current levels would be included as part of the Planned Development Ordinance. No housing or residents would be displaced as a result of project implementation. FEBRUARY 2013 36 Less Than Significant Potentially With Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Issues (and Supporting Information Sources) Impact Incorporated Impact Impact 14. Public Services - a) Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: Fire protection? X Police protection? X Schools? X Parks? X Other public facilities? X FEBRUARY 2013 36 INITIAL STUDY — 219 BEAN AVENUE 14a. Public Services Services are currently provided to the existing school facility. The Los Gatos /Monte Sereno Police Department and the Santa Clara County Fire Department provide emergency and public safety services to the school and would continue to do so after project implementation. The project would not increase demand for public services since services are already provided to the site and the project would not involve an increase over existing and proposed student enrollment of 315 students, and staffing levels of 37.5 FTE. Consequently, the proposed project would have a less than significant impact on public services. 15a, 15b. Demand for Recreational Facilities and Impacts Related to Construction of Recreational Facilities The proposed modifications to the CUP would not affect the use of existing parks or recreational facilities. There would be no population growth associated with the school use or resulting from proposed changes to the school's CUP. Therefore, the project would not increase demand for recreational facilities. The school already has recreational facilities for the student population. The project proposes the relocation of an existing play /parking area to an adjoining area immediately north of the existing play /parking area. The proposed location of the replacement play area is presently occupied by the 59 Victory Lane building proposed for demolition. Upon removal of this building, the play /parking area would be constructed on the former building site, thereby providing a replacement play area for students. As a result, no expansion of any recreational facilities would be required. The relocation of the play /parking area would be a less than significant impact of the project on recreational facilities and uses. Issues (and Supporting Information Sources) Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Less Than Significant Impact No Impact 16. Transportation /Traffic - Would the project: Significant a) Conflict with an applicable plan, ordinance or policy establishing Potentially With Less Than measures of effectiveness for the performance of the circulation Significant Mitigation Significant No Issues (and Supporting Information Sources) Impact Incorporated Impact Impact 15. Recreation - a) Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and X regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require the X construction or expansion of recreational facilities, which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? 15a, 15b. Demand for Recreational Facilities and Impacts Related to Construction of Recreational Facilities The proposed modifications to the CUP would not affect the use of existing parks or recreational facilities. There would be no population growth associated with the school use or resulting from proposed changes to the school's CUP. Therefore, the project would not increase demand for recreational facilities. The school already has recreational facilities for the student population. The project proposes the relocation of an existing play /parking area to an adjoining area immediately north of the existing play /parking area. The proposed location of the replacement play area is presently occupied by the 59 Victory Lane building proposed for demolition. Upon removal of this building, the play /parking area would be constructed on the former building site, thereby providing a replacement play area for students. As a result, no expansion of any recreational facilities would be required. The relocation of the play /parking area would be a less than significant impact of the project on recreational facilities and uses. Issues (and Supporting Information Sources) Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact 16. Transportation /Traffic - Would the project: a) Conflict with an applicable plan, ordinance or policy establishing X measures of effectiveness for the performance of the circulation system, taking into account all modes of transportation including mass transit and non - motorized travel and relevant components of the circulation system, including but not limited to intersections, streets, highways and freeways, pedestrian and bicycle paths, and mass transit? FEBRUARY 2013 37 INITIAL STUDY — 219 BEAN AVENUE The Town's Traffic Impact Policy (Resolution 1991 -174) requires preparation of a detailed traffic study for any project with the potential to generate 20 or more additional AM or PM peak hour trips. A detailed traffic impact analysis (TIA) was completed by the Town's consulting traffic engineer, TJKM Transportation Consultants, in July 2012 and this report is included as Attachment 6. 16a, 16b. Impacts on the Circulation System and Conflicts with Congestion Management Program Significance Criteria. The Town's level of service (LOS) standard is LOS D. Intersections operating worse than LOS D are considered impacted and should be considered for mitigation. Also, the proposed project is considered to have a significant impact if it causes the levels of service for the study intersections to drop more than one level if it is at LOS A, B, or C, and drop any further if it is at D or worse. Project Trip Generation. St. Mary's School is currently operating with an enrollment of 315 students, which is 50 more students than is allowed under the existing conditional use permit and corresponds to the proposed level of enrollment. Therefore, TJKM analyzed study intersections that already include additional traffic from the proposed increase in enrollment. The proposed enrollment increase by 50 students is estimated to have added 45 trips (25 inbound and 20 outbound trips) during the a.m, peak hour and 30 trips (14 inbound and 16 outbound) during the school p.m. peak hour (between 2:30 p.m. and 3:30 p.m.) to the Los Gatos street system. Intersection Level of Service Operation. Peak -hour turning movement counts at the study intersections were conducted on a typical weekday during the first half of May 2012, when St. Mary's School was in regular session. Figure 3 of Attachment 6 illustrates the existing lane configuration and the peak hour turning movement volumes at the study intersections. The raw traffic counts are provided in Appendix B of the TIA. The detailed LOS calculations (TRAFFIX Output) are contained in Appendix C of the TIA. The appendices are available for review at the Los Gatos Community Development Department (located at 110 East Main Street during counter hours from 8:00 a.m. to 1:00 p.m., Monday through Friday). TJKM evaluated the project's impact at the following five intersections: (1) Los Gatos Saratoga Road (State Route 9) /Massol Avenue, (2) Los Gatos Saratoga Road (State Route 9) /N. Santa Cruz Avenue, (3) FEBRUARY 2013 38 Less Than Significant Potentially With Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Issues (and Supporting Information Sources) Impact Incorporated Impact Impact b) Conflict with an applicable congestion management program, X including, but not limited to level of service standards and travel demand measures, or other standards established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an X increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g., sharp X curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? e) Result in inadequate emergency access? X f) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs regarding X public transit, bicycle, or pedestrian facilities, or otherwise decrease the performance or safety of such facilities? The Town's Traffic Impact Policy (Resolution 1991 -174) requires preparation of a detailed traffic study for any project with the potential to generate 20 or more additional AM or PM peak hour trips. A detailed traffic impact analysis (TIA) was completed by the Town's consulting traffic engineer, TJKM Transportation Consultants, in July 2012 and this report is included as Attachment 6. 16a, 16b. Impacts on the Circulation System and Conflicts with Congestion Management Program Significance Criteria. The Town's level of service (LOS) standard is LOS D. Intersections operating worse than LOS D are considered impacted and should be considered for mitigation. Also, the proposed project is considered to have a significant impact if it causes the levels of service for the study intersections to drop more than one level if it is at LOS A, B, or C, and drop any further if it is at D or worse. Project Trip Generation. St. Mary's School is currently operating with an enrollment of 315 students, which is 50 more students than is allowed under the existing conditional use permit and corresponds to the proposed level of enrollment. Therefore, TJKM analyzed study intersections that already include additional traffic from the proposed increase in enrollment. The proposed enrollment increase by 50 students is estimated to have added 45 trips (25 inbound and 20 outbound trips) during the a.m, peak hour and 30 trips (14 inbound and 16 outbound) during the school p.m. peak hour (between 2:30 p.m. and 3:30 p.m.) to the Los Gatos street system. Intersection Level of Service Operation. Peak -hour turning movement counts at the study intersections were conducted on a typical weekday during the first half of May 2012, when St. Mary's School was in regular session. Figure 3 of Attachment 6 illustrates the existing lane configuration and the peak hour turning movement volumes at the study intersections. The raw traffic counts are provided in Appendix B of the TIA. The detailed LOS calculations (TRAFFIX Output) are contained in Appendix C of the TIA. The appendices are available for review at the Los Gatos Community Development Department (located at 110 East Main Street during counter hours from 8:00 a.m. to 1:00 p.m., Monday through Friday). TJKM evaluated the project's impact at the following five intersections: (1) Los Gatos Saratoga Road (State Route 9) /Massol Avenue, (2) Los Gatos Saratoga Road (State Route 9) /N. Santa Cruz Avenue, (3) FEBRUARY 2013 38 INITIAL STUDY - 219 BEAN AVENUE Main Street /Lyndon Avenue, (4) Main Street /N. Santa Cruz Avenue, and (5) Bean Avenue /Tait Avenue. The level of service analysis results are summarized in Table 5 for the following three scenarios: (1) Existing plus Project, (2) Existing plus Project plus Approved Projects (Background Plus Project Conditions), and (3) Existing plus Approved Projects plus Pending Projects (Cumulative Conditions). TABLE 5 INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE OPERATION School PM Peak AM Peak Hour Hour Background Plus Project Condition Average Average 1. Los Gatos Saratoga Road (SR 9) /Massol Ave. One -way Stop Delay D Delay C Traffic Condition and Intersection Control (sec /veh) LOS (sec /veh) LOS Existing Plus Project Condition One -way Stop 19.3 C 12.2 B 1. Los Gatos Saratoga Road (SR 9) /Massol Ave. One -way Stop >120.0 F* >120.0 F* 2. Los Gatos Saratoga Road (SR 9) /N. Santa Cruz Ave. Signal 39.8 D 37.1 D 3. Main Street /Lyndon Avenue One -way Stop 11.1 B 10.2 B 4. Main Street /N. Santa Cruz Avenue Signal 25.8 C 30.0 C 5. Bean Avenue /Tait Avenue All -way Stop 7.4 A 7.6 A Background Plus Project Condition 1. Los Gatos Saratoga Road (SR 9) /Massol Ave. One -way Stop 43.9 D 32.1 C 2. Los Gatos Saratoga Road (SR 9) /N. Santa Cruz Ave. Signal 25.5 C 15.1 B 3. Main Street /Lyndon Avenue One -way Stop 19.3 C 12.2 B 4. Main Street /N. Santa Cruz Avenue Signal 11.9 B 10.3 A 5. Bean Avenue /Tait Avenue All -way Stop 9.6 A 9.2 A Background Plus Project Plus Pending (Cumulative) Condition 1. Los Gatos Saratoga Road (SR 9) /Massol Ave. One -way Stop 49.3 D 37.1 D 2. Los Gatos Saratoga Road (SR 9) /N. Santa Cruz Ave. Signal 25.3 C 15.3 B 3. Main Street /Lyndon Avenue One -way Stop 20.7 C 12.8 B 4. Main Street /N. Santa Cruz Avenue Signal 11.9 B 10.3 A 5. Bean Avenue /Tait Avenue All -way Stop 9.6 A 9.3 A Note: Delay = Overall average intersection delay in seconds for signalized and all -way stop controlled intersections, or minor street (worst approach) delay for one -way stop control intersections; LOS = Level of Service; * = Left -turn movement SOURCE: TJKM Transportation Consultants (see Attachment 6) Existing Plus Project Conditions. Under Existing Conditions, all study intersections operate at acceptable levels of service during the a.m, and p.m. peals hours (LOS D or better) except for the Los Gatos Saratoga Road (State Route 9) /Massol Avenue intersection. The northbound left -turn movement of Massol Avenue at Los Gatos Saratoga Road operates at LOS F during both the a.m. and the school p.m. peak hours. This intersection is controlled with a one -way stop for the northbound left -turn movement on Massol Avenue. The northbound right -turn movement from Massol Avenue is uncontrolled and is provided with a dedicated travel lane on Los Gatos Saratoga Road for vehicles to turn into. The left -turn volumes from Massol Avenue are 26 and 28 vehicles per hour during existing a.m, and school p.m. peak hours, respectively. The peak -hour 95th- percentile queue for this movement is FEBRUARY 2013 39 INITIAL STUDY — 219 BEAN AVENUE approximately 75 feet (three vehicle lengths) during both peak hours, which is consistent with the field observations. The low volumes of the northbound left -turn movement do not meet any of the signal warrant criteria. Based on field observations and accident analysis, the signalization of this intersection does not appear to be necessary and therefore, the project's impact on operation of this intersection would be less than significant. It should be noted that the results of the level -of- service calculations are the same with and without the additional trips from the proposed project .12 Therefore, the project's impact on the northbound left -turn movement would be less than significant. TJKM recommends that the Town staff monitor the intersection operation to evaluate whether a new traffic signal or other improvements may need to be considered in the future. Existing Plus Project Plus Approved Projects (Background Plus Project) Conditions. TJKM identifies 17 approved projects 13 that are estimated to contribute a net total of 855 vehicular trips to the town's street network during the a.m, peak hour and 766 trips during the school p.m. peak hour. With these approved projects, the increase in average delay at study intersections is limited (less than three seconds of average delay). All study intersections would continue to operate acceptably (LOS D or better) except for the Los Gatos Saratoga Road /Massol Avenue intersection. The northbound left -turn at this intersection is expected to continue to operate at LOS F during both the peak hours. The northbound left -turn volumes from Massol Avenue to Los Gatos Saratoga Road are expected to remain approximately the same as existing volumes, 26 and 28 vehicles per hour during a.m. and school p.m. peak hours, respectively. The low volumes of the left -turn movement do not meet any of the signal warrant criteria, and no significant changes in traffic conditions are expected at this northbound left -turn movement in the near future. However, TJKM recommends that Town staff monitor the intersection operation to evaluate whether any improvements are required in future years. Background Plus Project Plus Pending Projects (Cumulative) Conditions. TJKM identifies nine pending projects 14 that could contribute a net total of 1,942 vehicular trips to the town's street network during the a.m. peak hour and 2,265 trips during the school p.m. peak hour. When traffic from pending projects are added (Cumulative Conditions), all study intersections are expected to continue to operate acceptably (LOS D or better) except for the Los Gatos Saratoga Road /Massol' Avenue intersection. The northbound left -turn at this intersection is expected to continue to operate at LOS F during both the peak hours. The northbound left -turn volumes from Massol Avenue to Los Gatos Saratoga Road are expected to remain approximately the same as existing volumes, 26 and 28 vehicles per hour during a.m. and school p.m. peak hours, respectively. The low volumes of the left -turn movement do not meet any of the signal warrant criteria. Although this movement currently operates at LOS F but does not meet signal warrant criteria and would continue to operate at this level with the proposed project, the project's contribution to cumulative impacts on intersection operations would not be cumulatively considerable, and therefore, less than significant. No significant changes in traffic conditions at this northbound left -turn movement are expected in the near future. However, TJKM recommends that Town staff monitor the intersection operation to evaluate whether any improvements are required in future years. 16c. Air Traffic Patterns The project site is not located within an airport land use plan, nor is there a public airport, public use airport, or private airstrip located in the project vicinity. Therefore, the project would have no impact on 12 Levels of service were also estimated by removing the trips generated with the additional 50 students from the existing traffic counts. The results of level -of- service calculations remain same with and without the additional project trips from the student enrollment expansion. is The list of 187 approved projects is included under Section 18b, Cumulative Impacts, and in Attachment 6. u The list of nine pending projects is included under Section 18b, Cumulative Impacts, and in Attachment 6. FEBRUARY 2013 40 INITIAL STUDY - 219 BEAN AVENUE air traffic patterns, would not directly increase air traffic levels, nor would there be any change in location that results in substantial safety risks. 16d. Traffic Safety Hazards Traffic Safety. TJKM reviewed the SWITRS (Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System) collision reports for the school traffic routes within the project vicinity. Based on the 2009 Collision Data on California State Highways publication, the average statewide collision rate for a four- legged suburban signalized intersection is 0.55 collisions per million vehicles (PMV). Similarly, the statewide average collision rate at multi- legged unsignalized intersection is 0.30 collisions PMV. Town staff provided the collision reports for streets in the project vicinity for the two -year period of April 1, 2009 through March 31, 2011, and they are summarized as follows: ■ One collision was reported at the Los Gatos Saratoga Road /Massol Avenue intersection. Based on the existing peak hour turning movement counts, the number of vehicles entering this intersection is estimated to be 8.04 million vehicles during the aforementioned two -year time period. The collision rate for an intersection is defined as the number of collisions per million vehicles entering the intersection. The collision rate at the Los Gatos Saratoga Road /Massol Avenue intersection is calculated to be 0.12 (= 1/8.04) collisions per million vehicles. Thus, the estimated collision rate at this intersection is well below the statewide.average rate of 0.30 collisions PMV. ■ The number of vehicles entering the Los Gatos Saratoga Road /N. Santa Cruz Avenue intersection is 12.44 million vehicles. Collision reports for this intersection obtained from the Town staff for the last two years indicate that there were three collisions. The collision rate at this intersection is estimated at 0.24 (= 3/12.44) collisions PMV, which is well below the statewide average rate of 0.55 collisions PMV. ■ The number of vehicles entering the intersection of Main Street /N. Santa Cruz Avenue is 5.35 million vehicles. Collision reports for this intersection indicate that there were two collisions. The collision rate at this intersection is 0.38 (= 2/5.35) collisions PMV. Thus, the collision rate at this intersection is well below the statewide average rate of 0.55 collisions PMV. ■ No collisions were reported for the last two years (April 1, 2009 — March 31, 2011) at the intersections of Main Street /Lyndon Avenue and Tait Avenue /Bean Avenue. Given the proposed project's relatively small trip generation numbers, the proposed project is expected to have little or no impact on the collision rate (or safety) at the study intersections. School Pick -up and Drop -off Observations. During the a.m. peak period between 7:30 a.m. and 8:30 a.m., the school -bound vehicles (driven by the parents of students) drop off students at the designated drop -off location along the cul -de -sac curbside on Lyndon Avenue and the curbside drop -off zone near an entrance of the school on Bean Avenue. The drop -off zone on Bean Avenue can accommodate approximately five vehicles at the curbside. Similarly, the drop -off zone along the cul -de -sac curbside on Lyndon Avenue can accommodate as many as nine vehicles. It takes approximately 20 to 25 seconds for a vehicle to drop off a student at the designated drop -off area. During the peak hour conditions, student drop -offs at the zone on Lyndon Avenue are assisted by the school staff to facilitate the process. During the school p.m. peak period between 2:30 p.m. and 3:30 p.m., the parent vehicles begin to arrive at the pick -up zone (which is same as the drop -off zone) and also stack along vacant curb parking spaces. It was noted that parent arrivals were spread over a longer time and the stacking conditions were relatively shorter compared to the a.m. peak drop -off activity. Based on the a.m. and the school p.m. peak hour observations by TJKM staff, no particular queuing issues were observed at the drop- off /pickup zones. FEBRUARY 2013 41 INITIAL STUDY — 219 BEAN AVENUE 16e. Emergency Access Emergency access to the site is currently provided from four adjacent streets: Bean Avenue, Tait Avenue, Victory Lane, and Lyndon Avenue. The access from Victory Lane is gated and available to emergency vehicles only. There is currently adequate emergency access and these accesses would remain unchanged with the proposed project. 16f. Conflicts with Alternative Transportation (Pedestrian, Bicycle, and Transit Access) There are existing sidewalks along streets providing access to the school from surrounding areas. There are paved, Class III bike lanes proposed in the 2020 General Plan on West Main Street, and they extend both west and east of the school. Bus Route 48 operates in the project area. The closest bus stop is located on West Main Street near North Santa Cruz Avenue. There are sidewalks along streets providing access between the school and this bus stop. Given the small increase in the number of students at this school, this project is not expected to cause any significant impact on transit service. 17a —17g. Utilities and Service Systems Utilities are currently provided to the existing buildings located on the project site, and no major off -site utility improvements are expected to be required for proposed improvements. Since this site is currently developed and utilities are extended to the project vicinity, no major off -site utility improvements are expected to be required. FEBRUARY 2013 42 Less Than Significant Potentially With Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Issues (and Supporting Information Sources) Impact Incorporated Impact Impact 17. Utilities and Service Systems — Would the project: a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable X Regional Water Quality Control Board? b) Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater X treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? c) Require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage X facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from X existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider, X which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the projects projected demand in addition to the providers existing commitments? f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to X accommodate the projects solid waste disposal needs? g) Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and regulations X related to solid waste? 17a —17g. Utilities and Service Systems Utilities are currently provided to the existing buildings located on the project site, and no major off -site utility improvements are expected to be required for proposed improvements. Since this site is currently developed and utilities are extended to the project vicinity, no major off -site utility improvements are expected to be required. FEBRUARY 2013 42 INITIAL STUDY — 219 BEAN AVENUE 18a, 18c. Significant Impacts on the Natural and Man -Made Environments This Initial Study indicates the proposed project would have a less- than - significant effect on the natural and man -made environment except for the following: Air Quality: Although the project's construction - related and operational air pollutant emissions would not exceed the significance thresholds for criteria pollutants, the BAAQMD recommends the all Basic Construction Mitigation Measures be implemented for all construction projects, whether or not construction - related emissions exceed significance thresholds. Therefore, the project's construction - related and operational increases in criteria pollutant emissions would be less than significant with implementation of Mitigation Measure AQ -1. ■ Cultural Resources: Since almost the entire site is covered with buildings or pavement, a visual inspection of the site was not possible, but the potential for discovery of obscured cultural resources during future development of the project site would still remain. ■ I3azards: Proposed demolition could result in airborne release of hazardous building materials, such as asbestos fibers or lead dust. ■ Noise: Noise levels at the 30 Tait Avenue residence are currently at the 55 dB DNL limit, and the project's 1 dB increase would cause ambient noise levels to exceed this limit. Therefore, project - related noise increases at this residence would be significant. The mitigation measures included in this Initial Study will be required to reduce these impacts to a less - than- significant level. 18b. Cumulative Impacts When the proposed project is considered together with other recently constructed, approved, or proposed projects in the vicinity, the proposed project could contribute to cumulative impacts, particularly those related to traffic increases and associated air quality and noise impacts. Approved projects that are located FEBRUARY 2013 43 Less Than Significant Potentially With Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Issues (and Supporting Information Sources) Impact Incorporated Impact Impact 18. Mandatory Findings of Significance - a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the X environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self - sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but X cumulatively considerable? ( "Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)? c) Does the project have environmental effects which will cause X substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? 18a, 18c. Significant Impacts on the Natural and Man -Made Environments This Initial Study indicates the proposed project would have a less- than - significant effect on the natural and man -made environment except for the following: Air Quality: Although the project's construction - related and operational air pollutant emissions would not exceed the significance thresholds for criteria pollutants, the BAAQMD recommends the all Basic Construction Mitigation Measures be implemented for all construction projects, whether or not construction - related emissions exceed significance thresholds. Therefore, the project's construction - related and operational increases in criteria pollutant emissions would be less than significant with implementation of Mitigation Measure AQ -1. ■ Cultural Resources: Since almost the entire site is covered with buildings or pavement, a visual inspection of the site was not possible, but the potential for discovery of obscured cultural resources during future development of the project site would still remain. ■ I3azards: Proposed demolition could result in airborne release of hazardous building materials, such as asbestos fibers or lead dust. ■ Noise: Noise levels at the 30 Tait Avenue residence are currently at the 55 dB DNL limit, and the project's 1 dB increase would cause ambient noise levels to exceed this limit. Therefore, project - related noise increases at this residence would be significant. The mitigation measures included in this Initial Study will be required to reduce these impacts to a less - than- significant level. 18b. Cumulative Impacts When the proposed project is considered together with other recently constructed, approved, or proposed projects in the vicinity, the proposed project could contribute to cumulative impacts, particularly those related to traffic increases and associated air quality and noise impacts. Approved projects that are located FEBRUARY 2013 43 INITIAL STUDY — 219 BEAN AVENUE within the project area or would have some influence on the project area such as traffic, and within the Town of Los Gatos that have been approved but not yet constructed or constructed but not yet fully occupied are listed as follows: 15 1. 15940 Blossom Hill Road (residential) 2. 15881 Linda Avenue (residential) 3. 371 Los Gatos Boulevard (residential) 4. 55 Los Gatos Saratoga (retail /office) S. 15720 Winchester Boulevard (office development replaces a single- family home) 6. 14881 National Avenue (medical office development replaces a single - family home) 7. 15400 Los Gatos Boulevard (office /retail) 8. 16005 Los Gatos Boulevard (mixed -use) 9. 950 University Avenue (self- storage) 10. 15928 Union Avenue (residential) 11. Samaritan Way (medical office) 12. Town Library (new library replaces the existing library) 13. 55 Placer Oaks (single- family housing) 14. 16213 Los Gatos Boulevard (residential replacing auto dealership) 15. 800 Blossom Hill Road (senior adult residential) 16. Albright Way Development (office and residential) 17. 930 University Avenue (soccer complex) 18. 106 Town Terrace (single family residential) The following projects are foreseeable developments that have not been approved, and are likely to add traffic to study intersections: 1. North Forty Specific Plan (mixed -use) 2. 15500 Los Gatos Boulevard (redevelopment assumptions for Moore Buick GMC dealership) 3. 620 Blossom Hill Road (redevelopment assumptions for Bentley Silicon Valley dealership) 4. 20 Dittos Lane Apartments (residential) 5. Twin Oaks (single - family residential) 6. 16212 Los Gatos Boulevard (residential replaces auto dealership) 7. 339 -341 Bella Vista (single- family residential) 8. 135 Riviera Drive (residential apartments expansion) 9. 15600 Los Gatos Boulevard (pharmacy /commercial development) 10. 640 Blossom Hill Road (restaurant) The geographic scope of the cumulative analysis varies by resource area. The proposed project would contribute to cumulative traffic impacts as well as other traffic - related air quality, greenhouse gas, and noise impacts. The geographic scope of the cumulative air quality analysis is regional (San Francisco Bay Area Air Basin), while the geographic scope of the greenhouse gas analysis is global. The cumulative noise impact analysis is more localized and limited to sensitive receptors located in the vicinity of the project site. The geographic scope of cumulative hydrologic and water quality impacts is San Francisco Bay region. For the evaluation of cumulative impacts on public services and utilities, the geographic scopes vary with each service agency's service boundary, which is the town boundary in some cases. 15 This list of cumulative projects was used as the basis to evaluate traffic impacts in May 2012. While some of the approved projects in this list have been completed, this list represents the maximum or worst -case impact because the traffic study assigns the trips generated by all of the listed projects to the future Cumulative Condition, but those that were fully completed and occupied would also be reflected in the traffic counts that were taken as part of the study. Therefore, some trips associated with the approved projects that were actually fully constructed or occupied could be accounted for twice in the Cumulative Condition. FEBRUARY 2013 44 INITIAL STUDY - 219 BEAN AVENUE With implementation of mitigation measures specified above, the project's contribution to cumulative air quality and traffic impacts would be less than cumulatively considerable and therefore, less than significant. FEBRUARY 2013 45 This Page Intentionally Left Blank INITIAL STUDY - 219 BEAN AVENUE ATTACHMENT 1 TOWN RESOLUTION 1985 -47 ORIGINAL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL ST. MARY'S PARISH SCHOOL This Page Intentionally Left Blank INI'QPu ^1lATIUN 1' U61 PLANNING COVWi .._ '.,ION AGENDA 4/24/85 At,) cc: Planning uiaff 4/18/,85 rb ( RESOLUTIUN NO. 1985T47 RESOLUTION DENYING APPEAL FROM PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVAL OF CUNDITIONAL USE PERMIT, ARCHITECTURE AND SITE AND SUBDIVISION APPLICATIONS, AND ADDING CERTAIN FURTHER C014DIT.IONS TO THE APPROVAL (55 Lyndon Avenue -- St. Mary's Parish) WHEREAS: George Tobin has appealed a decision of the Planning Commission as follows: approval of Conditional Use Permit Application U- 84 -17, Architecture and Site Application S- 84 -50, and Sudivision Application M -84 -21 to operate an existing church, elementary school, rectory and uses accessory to the operation of the church and school ; and approval to make modifications to the facility including the construction of new multi- purpose and religious education buildings, remove an existing garage and construct a new garage, and construct new parking facilities on property in Rl -D zone located at 55 Lyndon Avenue and owned by the Roman Catholic Bishop of San Jose; and the Negative Declaration for the project; and A public hearing was held on March 18, 1985; IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED:. The Town Council hereby finds that the findings of the Planning Commission were correct as follows: 1. The project.wi11 not have a significant impact on the environment and a Negative Declaration is made. 2. Reasons for denial of the Subdivision proceeding do not exist. 3. Findings for the Conditional Use Permit: a. The proposed uses of the property are essential or desirable to the public convenience or welfare in that they are talking about religious education and better administration of their church with the new buildings. b. The proposed uses will not impair the integrity or c har- acter.of the zone because the church has existed there for so many years and the expansion would be on the interior of the property (and not expanding outward into the neighborhood). C. The proposed uses will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or general welfare with the mitigation measures (striping, educational program urging people to park off- street, gates for different exits). d. The proposed uses are in harmony with the various elements and objectives of the General Plan and the Zoning Ordinance because a church is allowed in any zone and this church was there before the Town was incorporated. The Town Council further finds that the decision of the Planning Commission was correct to approve Conditional Use Permit Application U- 84-17, Architecture and Site Application S-84-60 and Subdivision Application IA -84 -21 and the decision to make the negative declaration on the project. The conditions of the approval are as follows: 1. A parcel map shall be filed to the satisfaction of the Town Engineer merging the existing eight lots into two lots. 2. If the cul -de -sac proposal is approved, the owner of the property shall apply to the Town Engineer for abandonment of the portion of Lyndon Avenue required for this project. Commission approval of this application constitutes the finding 'that the abandonment of Lyndon Avenue is consistent with the General Plan and the Downtown Specific Plan and no further referral by the Town Council is necessary. 3. Dedication of the following rights -of -way shall be made to the satisfaction of the Town Engineer: . a. Lyndon Avenue. Fifty foot wide right -of -way with a 40 -foot radius cul -de -sac bulb. b. Easements for storm and sanitary sewers and other utilities. 4. The following improvements shall be guaranteed by contract and bond to the satisfaction of the Town Engineer: a. Lyndon Avenue. Portland cement concrete curb, gutter, and six -foot wide sidewalk, asphaltic concrete paving to create a 32 -foot curb radius cul -de -sac bulb and six -foot wide sidewalk with a 35 -foot curb -to -curb street width beyond the cul -de -sac bulb, installation of storm drainage catch basins, new electrolier, sani- tary sewer manhole, and sanitary sewer lateral with property line clean -out. b. -Tait Avenue. Repair of all cracked and broken sections of Portland cement concrete curb, gutter and sidewalk. C. Bean Avenue. New driveway approach and repair of cracked and broken sections of curb, gutter and sidewalk. -2- I I 5. Grading, drainage, curb, gutter and sidewalk repair, under - ground utility services, parking -lot, parking lot striping, and parking lot lighting plans with 70-watt high pressure sodium cut -off style fixtures shall be submitted to the satisfaction of the Town Engineer. 6. All required fire hydrant installations shall be tested and accepted by the Central Fire Protection District prior to the issuance of a Building Permit. 7. All gated areas shall be provided with Fire District "hledeco" locking devices. 8. A two -year tree maintenance contract shall be established for the protection of existing and newly planted trees, to the satisfaction of the Town Engineer. g. The paved parking lot that will be used on Sundays will be made accessible by automobi 1 e' from Victory Lane. 10. An ongoing weed abatement program or landscape maintenance program shall be instituted for the project, specifically along Tait. 11. An educational program to encourage churchgoers. to use off - street parking shall be instituted. 12. Additional screening landscaping shal 1 'be provided along the perimeters of the property to the satisfaction of the Direc- tor of Narks, f=orestry and Maintenance Services. Based on the foregoing findings, the Council makes the following decision: 1. The appeal is denied. 2. The project will not have a significant impact on the environment and a Negative Declaration is made. 3. Conditional Use Permit Application U-84 -17, Architecture and Site Application S- 84 -60, and Subdivision Application M -84 -11 are approved subject to ttie conditions of approval set by the Planning Commission and the following additional conditions; 1:). The maximum number of seats in the church shall be 654; the maximum number of students enrolled in the school, grades.t1 -ti8.,, shall be 265; and the maximum number of emp16 6' s sha71. be,,ZU, 14: The Planning Commission shall review the traffic impact and the adequacy of circulation and parking six (6) months after the completion of the improvements. -3- 15. Applicant to revise landscaping plan to replace ficus trees with larger trees and to plant coni- fers around the perimeter, especially on Victory Lane, Bean Avenue and Tait Avenue, subject to review by the Director of Narks, Forestry and Maintenance Services. 16. The success of the education program concerning parking and alternatives will be reviewed by the Planning Commission six (6) months after the completion of the improvements. Pursuant to Los Gatos Town Code Section 1 -15, the time for seeking judicial review for the Town Council decision is governed by California Code of Civil Procedure Section 1U94.6. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a reaular --meeting of the Town Council of the Town of Los Gatos held on the 8th day of ®April ,.1985 by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS Eric D. Carlson, Terrence J. Daily, Thomas•J. Ferrito, Brent N. Ventura, and Mayor Joanne Benjamin NOES COUNCILMEMBERS None ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS None ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS None SIGNED: /s/ Joanne Benjamin MAYOR OF THE TOWN OF EOS GATOS ATTEST: /s/ Rose E. Al dace (seal ) C ERK OP THE TOWN OF LOS GATOS ..4.. INITIAL STUDY - 219 BEAN AVENUE ATTACHMENT 2 ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN REVIEW 219 BEAN AVENUE :° CANNON DESIGN GROUP JANUARY 2, 2013 This Page Intentionally Left .Blank ARCHITECTURE PLANNING URBAN DESIGN December 27,2012 JAN _,. 2093 Ms' Jennifer Savage Community Development Department TOWN OF LOS GATOS 'Town of Los Gatos PLANNING DIVISION 110 E. Main Street Los Gatos, CA 95031 RE: 219 Bean Avenue Dear Jennifer: I reviewed the drawings, visited the site, prepared an initial review and worked with staff and the applicant to refine the design. This letter summarizes the earlier issues and the applicant's responses to the recommendations. Neighborhood Context The site is occupied by a large complex of church and academic buildings surrounded by a traditional Los Gatos resi- dential neighborhood on three sides, and by the small scale North Santa Cruz Avenue business corridor on the fourth side. Photos of the site and surrounding neighborhood are shown below and on the following page. 700 LARKSPUR LANDING CIRCLE . SUITE 199 . LARKSPUR . CA . 94939 TEL: 415.331.3795 CD<:a'L,y� q t'1(= I3Ett.htr i } i New junior High site (left) and existing Lower School Building (right) Existing Multi - Purpose Building Existing After School Care Building Traditional house across Bean Avenue 219 Buan Avenue csien cv!cu• .omments December 27, 21112 hge 2 Existing Church Existing Howley Hall Adjacent office structure on Bean Avenue Traditional house across Bean Avenue CANNON DESIGN GROIN' -00 LARKSPUR LANDING CIRCLE . SUITE. 199 . LARKSPUR . CA . 94939 219 (lean avenue Dcsip Review Comments, December 27, 2013 Page 3 Concerns and Recommendations 1. When I conducted my site reconnaissance, I was fortunate to see the campus in full operation with students utilizing the large open paved space for recreation, and the parents later driving into The same paved open space to pick Lip their children. While this portion of the complex is rather barren, it is understandable given the many and varied de- mands on the open space. SO, given the visually harsh quality of this eastern portion of the complex, which is in strong contrast to the attention given to landscaping in the surrounding neighborhood, it seemed reasonable to ask the design team to look for additional opportunities to add trees and ground cover to the large expanses of paving The existing and proposed planters at the base of buildings facing the main open space are good. In addition the applicant has added landscaped areas and trees in other locations as shown on the diagram below. The new gate and brick piers at the Bean Avenuc auto entry will also much improve the visual appearance of the entry and parking -area. New fence and Piers have been chanaed t l SW1 Q `Y l 4 I4Y i 1 ,I 1 I 11 i } 1 1 are good ;t t } 1 } utut C", r: Di CANNON DESIGN GROUP 700 LARKSPUR LANDING CIRCLE . SUITE 199 . LARKSPUR . CA . 94939 0 219 Bean :Avenue December 27, 2012 Page 4 2. The proposed renovation of the Lower School Building seems modest and straightforward. I hive no comments or recommendations for changes to the design. 3. There were a number of issues with the proposed new- Junior High School Building shown in the sketch below: Previously proposed new Junior High School Building Identified Issues: • While the design was relatively simple, it seemed to draw its inspiration largely from tine Lower School Building, and did not relate well to the other more substantial buildings on the campus or to the attention to detail seen in the surrounding neighborhood. • The materials did little to mitigate the harshness of the very large asphalt paved areas addressed above. • The east facade presented a tall stucco face to Victory Lane whereas the :adjacent existing Lower School Build- ing has a low brick wall facing the lane. The recommendations for the jp nior High School building were as listed, and shown on the diagram belo«. • Pace the first floor on all sides of the structure, including Victory Lane, with brick to relate to the brick on other buildings oil the campus. • Lilhance the entries by providing a more distinctive window pattern and wall cap at tine upper floor over the entries, and adding distinctive lighting adjacent to the entries. • Provide a supporting heam expression at the second floor line. • Add additional landscaping near the building. • Firm up the design at the edges to the north entry access ramp. Provide positive Provide more Provide a supporting beam expression Utilize brick on ground floor including Victory Lane frontage Add distinctive fights to Hetinement is neeaea nere io aenne peaesinan emphasize entries ramp edges and allow handrails (if required) (Consider planter with Integrated top for seating) Previous north elevation recommendations CANNON DESIGN GROUP 700 LARKSPUR LANDING CIRCLE . SUITE 199 . LARKSKJR . CA . 94939 219 Bean Avenue Design Review Commcnui December 27, 2013 Page 5 I feel that the applicant has responded well to the identified concerns, and I feel comfortable with the revised design, as shown in the currently proposed elevadon drawings below. Currently proposed north elevation Currently proposed west elevation Currently proposed Victory Lane elevation Note extent of existing brick CANNON DESIGN GROUP 700 LARKSPUR LANDING CIRCLE.. SUITE 199 . LARKSPUR . CA . 94939 19 Venn Avenua thcembu 27, 2012 Rage G There was one additional issue involving both the site plan and the design of the new Junior High School structure, and that is the height of the new building. The desire to access the new building at the same Icvel , the Lower School Building makes sense, and allows an easy flow of pedestrian traffic for all, including disabled students. Although I believe that the (height would be acceptable since the building would be positioned facing onto the large open space, I did looked lowering the structure. I- Iowevcr, I don't believe that there are any reasonable ones that could at. potential alternatives to lo accomplish a significant height reduction Without major impacts oil the floor plan (e.g., absorbing some vertical circula- tion to the first floor within the structure at its south end), serious diminution of the design (e.g., utilizing all flat roofs), awkwardness in pedestrian flows (e.g., limiting disabled access to the structure to the north end of the new building), or substantial additional cost (e.g., regrading and repaving a major portion of the central open space). Each of these pos- sibilities could have potential consequences far more serious than the impact of the slight increase in extra height. Should this increase in height still remain an important issue for which the above identified examples seem undesir- able, it seems to file that the other alternatives that might. be explored would revolve around a reduction in the. floor -CO' ti floor heights which could involve: • :Acceptance of a floor -to- ceiling height of less than ten feet on one or both levels. • Using other mechanical systems or methods of delivering heated and cooled air to the spaces through a more complete integration of ducts with the floor, roof and will structures that alight require less depth within the dropped ceiling areas. Jennifer, please let file know if you have any questions, or if there are specific issues of concern that I did not address. Sincerely, CANNON DLSIGN GROUT' v l�� Larry L. Cannon CANNON DESIGN GROUP 700 LARKSPUR LANDING CIRCLE . SUITE 199 . LARKSPUR . CA. 94939 INITIAL STUDY - 219 BEAN AVENUE ATTACHMENT 3 CALEEMOD OUTPUT AND HEALTH RISK ANALYSIS FOR THE AIR QUALITY AND GHG ANALYSES FOR ST. MARY'S PARISH NEW JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL BUILDING 219 BEAN AVENUE LOS GATOS, CALIFORNIA C GIROUX & ASSOCIATES NOVEMBER 15, 2012 Ais Page Intentionally Left Blank ■ \ r \ _ j r c 0 « CL m X 0 « k� �m ■ o � q � . S § Cl) LL U) \ \ \ 0 \ \ \ \ 0 � � � 2 @ ■ � Q 2 (D IL g % 5 / \ u < \ (D � £ 2 \ / ; K [ / ) ,gi : :» 3 » \ � � = o g � i $ . \ = 3 n 0 0 `_ \ ° 0 d 2 7 \ e 2 6 CO ' : $ ) \ 0 \ =f E / ® = 0 u ~ a . ^ f ® \ \ ƒ . < \ LL. ) \ m § ° o o ƒ ! 2 % ; ± 0 a ® o R / 4 <& k \ / e ® Cf) ] m § § ° . 2 \ © E § 6 \ _ \� / / / ? w \ 6 2 § \ f o I o \_ / Q ca \ / / & \ E ) o E CL 0. CL � \ } IL § 2 2 � / § y J/ J/ _ k o m g t $ \ \ ƒ \ oc 0 0 0 0 q§§ q E j/ 0 % 5 ILL ao r O E N f C _O CO L N 0 Q. N C CL U) CL LD Cn C1 I-' d U i C O N C O V O CV 0 C O V N l�6 C C 7 y c 0 C.± d f�0 (III II �' ij � 'In ;Ij n n Inil�dlil ; iy ill I iIhl�Ill� IIII IIIJII.. r h �m'il i 4�,y`tJl IIII;I IF'tl' O o O 0 Zi Ifl ,Ili o 0 KIN JI ', SI"li� o VI i VIII I o o 0 11 UglpJI 1 1 wI�jJ III: n Ilbl I�II�pp}ti 1��4��II�IIII I�I'il � Nlllilf. I1 i c 0`�, I A i N N Z OI!'`i iihl rI n n I h G 0 0 u1I1'� 1111 @J N r lih 4 1 1, � j 1 x at: o.fFitl ,I�Ilu o 0 ,Nl�ifr ,i'yr''; • I I1 I�I'I lalll, 1I4,: 17r _ 4 > N O O d- O O LL It- ii I,I IINI. Ctl'' I1, Ik o L hl LLdl'� 'Il ij o 0 I I ,I 0 0 O O FI j �I� AI 0 0 I��i1'••� IIII IIII. 0 I�I al„ I n I{ 0 It IFI� 111 I o O 7 Iil �'al�� , , ' o O 1 I��I Fll lr I JI_.j �IiI GI b y ll!' �I'JI U o 0 � i IIII O O I I '! N it II •. III Ili fi' to Z IIiIF .: N VIII I, '014 „ to � r „ll o [G JII M O M o Iluh III IIIIJ. - I.r t {7J III_'` t �IIIII rni r o wl o ° N {- 1 t` rk I, C 7 y c 0 C.± d f�0 (III II �' ij � 'In ;Ij N N INI�'; i� Ilp)Idy n n o 0 KIN SI"li� o O i VIII I I. II� 0 0 11 1 1 N uuI I�II�'IN N I�II�pp}ti 1��4��II�IIII I�I'il � n i { A i N N Z OI!'`i iihl rI n n I h G 0 0 l {III _ lih 4 1 1, � j 1 x at: o.fFitl ,I�Ilu o 0 ,Nl�ifr ,i'yr''; • I rol�lll tl' I lu't J lilal ' - - ii I,I IINI. I1, Ik o O LLdl'� 'Il ij o 0 I ,I 0 0 17 °I ;_ FI j N N o 0 O YI' 7 Iil �'al�� I,II h� o 0 LL� jHl I I��I Fll lr I JI_.j �IiI GI b y ll!' �I'JI o 0 � i IIII O O I I '! N it II •. III Ili fi' VIII I, '014 „ to � r „ll o zll, yJ�l •- - � O' lhLlll III_'` m rni r o o I14,ti7� I� iIIItiI; t11u:I illi'' II CO N N 0 O N C Q �F+ O is O N N (tl C O L O E c M °o :n :": :� Irn O N I T . V . O co ...4...4...4...4.. ...4...4...4...4.. O O O O O O O r O r O O O O O O ...4...4...4...4__ N N M W N O N N O N O �N (9 O N N _.. _4...4...4...4.. O O O Lo O w O O O O O O ...4...4._.4...4._ O ; O : O : O O O O O O O O O ...4. _.4...4...4.. � O O � O O � O C .. _4...4...4...4. O . O : O : O : 5 0 O .6 : O :C; 0LO ...L ....... .. .4. O O O : O O O : 0 0 0 0 O ...4...4...4...4.. � O ...4 ... 4 --- 4 --- F- O O : O :0 O O O O .. "4 "" "4.__.4...4. ...4...4...4...4.. O � O O � O r O O O O O O O O � O O ro ID N N N 0 O M C O M O O N CV fd C O i N O lC O C', �`r i0 ar0 ...4...4...4...4.. O ' O' O O ' O O O O O O O O ...4...4...4...4. - 0 O N (h ' ' Lo N O i N O O oo ...4 _..4 ...4_ °o N m o ,n v O N - 1 O O oMD ...4...4...4...4.. N ' O Lo O O O ' oD ' O' oD O O O O O ' O O ' O ' O ' O ' O O ...4...4 --- 4...4 -. ' O O � O G ...4...4...4...4.. O ' O ' O ' O ' O w O ' O ' O ' O ' O O .. _4...4...4...4.. ...4...4...4...4.. ' O O � O O ...4...4...4...4... ._.4...4...4 - -.4.. Q t O : C3 O ' O O ._.4....4...4.._4.. o ,o o 'o Ics ...4...4...4...4.. O :o O o � o o ' o T N N 0 C v 7 L C O U O' cri C O 6 L V; C O U 7 W C O co i+ M N N 0 O It M O N C O AO W N M ch C O C O U 7 N C O U N C O C O V y C O U N C� G C 1 Ni 1:. - 1I` ----------- m 'O 'N N ,O fV SKI i11 f' i I If;� 'o '0 ILcy 1 o 0 ' ' O o o O O ; O ; O O Q Co ' O ' M M O O (V CL _ - 'O 'N M N A ol O O .0 l ll l� 0. �• �' ;I O ; O ; O O ik I ;O O oI O ; O ; O C 0 o ; o ; 0 0 .C. -. O '.I 4> O I �y F.if O O ' O O Ali 7 , I r OO f I I o o' 0 0 I I II ! riG I j I Ni S � ~ t I ii jjf 1 lii cl. N N 0 O LO M N C O O N M C O C V C V N C vJ 4 O C O V L C V N G I;III I I� 1171 I 111 1 cc++�� M ' o :w O i Illj It I O ' O ' O Illi,l ">Ikl hl o OII I'I�I co ' O ' N in M' Plq a I I 'p 'N 'N IZ OU Ir 5 Ih ' co M o o I . Ti : , s ; ��on F11J ' yllil Ij 131 {I o ' o ' o 0 III �II I It Ik Iii i o� o � 0 0 „ rkI'll hllh .. ill II ��lu 111 Olt I IN , o , o , 0 6 , I � ,! ' m IIIlj O ' O ' O O O IIII 1: O ' O a o; o ; o o Ih I, j rtlll I14 � � IIOIIp III ri Il11 O O O C .:: X1sr ,. ..4 .. .4 .. ip I Z fl II o; o ; 0 0 1111f �I �!' 1 Iry O olll'!'I I Walll� at I_II p p p O O O p. O 1 1' 1 4 { Ila....l I t4 I t'y y 1111 11 �`I I! m IFIr �l W c , I C 0 O F 1I�1'��II LII 111,1 N CV 0 O CO Cl) N CID V M Ch C O c O U O V V l6 C O C O U lC C O 'o .0 O O ' O ' O O o ; o ; 0 0 O ' O ' O O o ; o O O � O 00 ' 00 ' 00 0 0 0 :0 0 O ' O ' ' O O O ' O O O O O :6 O 00 ' 00 ' 00, 0 ; 0 ; 0 0 O O O- O O ' O ' O o .6 :0 O ' O 0 ; 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O ' O 0 ;0 ;0 0 0 O ' O ' O rC5. 0 .0 ' ' ' ' O ' 0 ' O JwMMJQL �o F N N O ti jr o it I 0' ' m 1� M r J�TI t jl l 1 NOR- ' I i, ITS O! rn °0 rn 1 m Cl) I1 if l vill I 1 I OOI.. �i l4 �• m m O) m C6 C'i 0 0 0 m�i3 is Ndl f 0 0 J., Jil. 1_I I N O ALL lit J O F- I µ a"ki IIII 0 o I ' O O fn JiI I l i.: I i O � G t; UI �0 0 I Q 1 zlI 1 ;0 0 �I 1l I:I N 21 111 � O O i,f n 41e .f. k I o'o y y « 1 CC C U � O C O U lC C O 'o .0 O O ' O ' O O o ; o ; 0 0 O ' O ' O O o ; o O O � O 00 ' 00 ' 00 0 0 0 :0 0 O ' O ' ' O O O ' O O O O O :6 O 00 ' 00 ' 00, 0 ; 0 ; 0 0 O O O- O O ' O ' O o .6 :0 O ' O 0 ; 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O ' O 0 ;0 ;0 0 0 O ' O ' O rC5. 0 .0 ' ' ' ' O ' 0 ' O JwMMJQL �o F N N O ti M N °a a M (Ii C O C V L U) C O V !�0 cn 4 O C O V 7 C O' U N O ' o ' o O O ; o ; O O ...4...4.. O O O L o ; o ; 0 T o ; o ; 4...4 OO ' 0 0 o ' o ' 0 0 o ; o ; 0 0 • •. •••.• o ; o ; 0 0 O ' O ' O 0 O O O O ' O ' O O O ; O ; O O O O O 1 O O 'O 'O O O ; O ; O o ...4...4.. O ' O ' 0 .p o ; o ; o O O :0 :0 O O o O O ' O -E; O C3 ; o ; o C 0 0 0 to o 'o .0 0 O :0 ; 0 t O O ' O ' O m ' ° F N N 0 O 00 1 °o plcl 1�F ' v a ' I fry' '. �I'YI II yl LI O O O II K 1'x'1.•: I I I •. I f , _4 _ . O j T�I'I tT ' o 171fj lli iFAi l,.. O m cq m Cl ° ' II b'i1� Fii Him il ��t�� O m ri z O'Al'; o ' , � r2 { �� , n 1111 o; o 0 • N m�"I'. s JIB ! o '0 g°z IYiI'. o o ;. 0 0 0 N Nii!I �I1I II O ' O O .roC cGI �f 14 _. N - p ' p a I11J' 14i o ; o O BFI 111 Y Q. �ii I1JI1 O ; O O. >O l lll�i !L NI II{ O O Ip�g N17�'I l -I �SI 'O 0 O iX11 L Yt ili a ij Miry "YI ' lF IFS Off,,�SNyJ�1 - I �Fi !rr ; O O rl l�.�I Yr41�� ; ?I,f Bull o o o o �i11Fi Y '1111 o O IjIJ I I fl� jl �, I II ��I,�Iyi IU" o°C 00 o F rn LL 1 cn 4 O C O V 7 C O' U N O ' o ' o O O ; o ; O O ...4...4.. O O O L o ; o ; 0 T o ; o ; 4...4 OO ' 0 0 o ' o ' 0 0 o ; o ; 0 0 • •. •••.• o ; o ; 0 0 O ' O ' O 0 O O O O ' O ' O O O ; O ; O O O O O 1 O O 'O 'O O O ; O ; O o ...4...4.. O ' O ' 0 .p o ; o ; o O O :0 :0 O O o O O ' O -E; O C3 ; o ; o C 0 0 0 to o 'o .0 0 O :0 ; 0 t O O ' O ' O m ' ° F N N 0 O 00 Cl) O N L.. O V C O U c m d' M V) c O O V 7 w C O V E C Q c O V 7 C O U E C W�I�u 1'vliIII' ' Iryry''..F III . 41 i 0 TOW-! ' O ; CV ; N .4 ULIi_ Ii, `7 :; III N 00 N p If jn 00 N i i 'o '0 OII i' NI �IIIL', ; o O ' ' O O 0 O - ftl; o ;o ;0 I��i 5 Y 1 ' O O CJ NI qa o ; o ; 0 0 � 0 111 � � Iif�I t. •. -: � ��I hI N N �41' Pal N1 1 I J _ h,� i l l l 0 ; cm ; N d IT. mO' ZIU1 N N 71 L,I Ii__l L r - II}}J o o0 00 '{U 1, O O I��IJIIJ�•- 1�A)Jl.le- i - o I� N "' 0 O o O ;O ;O O �(t]�LIfiJl' d' "Lill' 0 0 NII �ar1 llmd-u N II I o 0 m 11; 0 � � UU I O O y O A LL a I �a 0 O O 0 1 OI �O U ili 10 i I.. 0 ;0 ;0 0 { 4 1 - YI i. J I- O U I Ili ao Z0 II I I: I I o 0 o 0 I � O 'O 'O ' 0 ,f• aIa Z 1 1, 1 I s li 1 I C7 J O JI m m ¢ O o 0 I I 1 Il. o o M 1 U O j,I ' p Q c O V 7 C O U E C W�I�u 1'vliIII' ' Iryry''..F III . 41 i 0 TOW-! ' O ; CV ; N .4 1 i s 'o '0 OII i' NI �IIIL', ; o O ' ' O O 0 O Z�II1,.1 ftl; o ;o ;0 0 5 CJ NI qa o ; o ; 0 0 � � Iif�I t. •. -: � ��I hI "- 4 " -_4 -• OVA Pal h,� �Ih1�41 0 ; cm ; N d ,ollr�lrl ilal o ;o ;o O ' O 0 O tt Ih O ;O ;O O �(t]�LIfiJl' x�ilr'1rI "Lill' llmd-u N II K!: o ; 0 ; 0 0 Ilq IA lfl� ��� Ih •: � � UU J N LL a I 1 0 O O 0 1 0 ;0 ;0 0 { 4 1 - O ; O O $1JU � ay T o 0 I � O 'O 'O ' 0 ,f• aIa �� "0 ;o ;0 s li 1 p E! O ; O ; O O 1 Il. - ' p N O o 'o 'q N O z i, rlll;lfl alll; 0 ;0 ;0 0 0 101:11 1 0' o ' 0 0; o ; 0 0 rll.!fl,, 1 l I I 11tt,11 m 1 f I cV N 0 O 0) M N C v G U Ma W Cl) M C C O V 7 C O U d c M 4 O C O V 7 N c O U c; O ; N ; (V 'V o ; 0 ; 0 0 'o v O ;N. ; N .4 ...4._.4. 'o a O ;N ; N d4 ...4. .4. O ' O :0 O 0 0 ° ' O. °q :0 o o. ° o ; o ; 0 0 0 O O O 0 0 ; 0 0 O O o O ;0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 C) 0 ;0 0 O O O O ' O ' O O O ; O ; O O O OO O O O O O ' ' O O ' O ' O I O O .0 .0 O °o 'o 'o 0 0;0;0 0 O .0 .0 0 m�a °o ' °o, ' °o,. O O ; O O N N 0 O O �F U4 ail i'EII S 11 N N i, ONF I11n.! O 0 0 O 0 0 zIa Ihl tt p u��� U Illtjn O G iii ISIV a! r �ii O��'kl l�j r trl N N II ' Fh �� lw; u �s�l b Z� {lul, ,.,� 1 Iflra IA =' ,TI li . TIO r OI I' Of Y,Iff a o 0 N II, co 0 p ^! ar}i A rl i O o O 0 +II li t 4 � III' � lil Ili la I yell, ILS�eIIIi I�IjI��'II; 00 O co ° 4 ,I III 0 0 I ! a wL i� I 141 I t W CO I °A C ' I lLha ;'lii i^III :l III ulllf�u I it i. V% I III O O O m eo i rlrl P J�'I CO W I x�'IIgI _ � 'd101 ll1 aRI11 i! ", 0 { O�oC coo l 11'I 0 0 a VIII li, , ro 1 I I. -' M 4 O C O V 7 N c O U c; O ; N ; (V 'V o ; 0 ; 0 0 'o v O ;N. ; N .4 ...4._.4. 'o a O ;N ; N d4 ...4. .4. O ' O :0 O 0 0 ° ' O. °q :0 o o. ° o ; o ; 0 0 0 O O O 0 0 ; 0 0 O O o O ;0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 C) 0 ;0 0 O O O O ' O ' O O O ; O ; O O O OO O O O O O ' ' O O ' O ' O I O O .0 .0 O °o 'o 'o 0 0;0;0 0 O .0 .0 0 m�a °o ' °o, ' °o,. O O ; O O N N 0 O O M O N C1 C a 3 M O JRN s O U d G C m NIIII II I� co ' ° ro 'o Gill I,al }il (V � O fV ai Illil a� J I, i •4 - I Q Ii .i l N IlkZ lh: UIIII� O ;O G I'1 Iill l.- T�; ' F 4. O II lift p ro'(IIl'1' IIII N ; O N ,- 1 III„, ..F- NC _ I O 1 ' all O O ; O WIC oil ion N D it O 'O O II ul I - >l�ll Ifi mgl I ILL ; O N O 1 0 N I. NNEL' 0 rnal' IIIII O O fA O G OI 1 ! O O r Il ' II I; Q ' NMII1 ,. I Q AQi I'il Ili IIf � o ' 0 0 NNE �m Z co ............... U O CD Y O O V Y O U N Cm G C is. _ _ _ _ _ I ' l0 ,I I IIi1lI I °o � °o m o0 ItI .4 ...4.. mug IQ I{ O ; O O `7!r ..4 ...F . . N d �fA II PI 2 1 �I��jl o; c ; •- 1 ,F-M�II - 4 -..4.. �(IIiII II, I 1� I: jlr wit I Itl o; o ; o ri ,LL q i MEN I O O go 0 I O- > i I, II ill:VT 6 0 flfll.� I low i IIII O O O O ; O ; O O O 1 00 00 00 Se' ' III' I 0 III ilk I_I ' 1 � m O] h i N N 0 O T M 0 N c CL v C c U N c O U I L A III OI�y i ' 11h1 I - cV o (V I, {I' 1 111. II I I1 1�1 Ird I ' I {, ' °o °o 111 iG If' -. II Ii IF,( I h { VIII fj1 4.. t III . II , IJI a hl,l o� o� o 0 .I o ; o a 2 1 Ol ;ill1Aj h1i,- Oo co I II i�lliii1!Il N � N I � yQI� V{Ihl" Igo,, �i`Ilr I, r €old! IL1; I\ I` miNlhl ,00 W � I I j� kil NIIII{ I IIIEIYtI' ' I'I N �d 111 ' 01171,(,1 11j' I 1 yi'11 O ' O o O 0 mIIII�II�I�g Itt111.I .0 1 Iwl ai' O ti11ulI) 0 I,II x i 171 I'I i II {i. I o ; ° ° m ti °o ' o° ' °o °o (ilI N N ! Tv O O � Nil O In II m l' t O,. tia d, O ' O O I 1 I IIII' ' I O]I VIII r III O O ' O o ;o O 0 IJ iii I I G xxa �+ C; C5 o ;0 0 - OIII j jlI m� d; 1111, ma I,iy o 'o 'o 0 ILL.- Ir I.'i A I - 11 I ' N17 fA , O O � O � O I(n 1 O O '1111�� 1 III I hl p ill II j I O OIaI19j1 � 1 G Ui fl4 PAS O I 4 -- I O o O O Z I I III O O I II�1 1 lit.. Ifll 111 y o o' 0 I, IG� 4 Il ih C'JII I hII' I i i N � O N �IjI 41 17 yu'' O � O O 161 F � u I-' , {°- 1 V ,rllt Il 1 7 IiP 11 J I�11I IIII m F� lyl (IIII j, Ir I a -.. c O V _ N c O U a ca �'I�111II1I ll 111 �. I�iVllill I, -II 1 o° ' °o ' Oi l Q TC.11� a I I'. =1 h II {I�,�tllll„ i I�uyl�l, t III . a hl,l o� o� o 0 .I o ; o a co 0 W O O D II,O +I'•1{ { {l l 111 r €old! I7'i O' o ; m ' M O Z,fV� O O N W � I I j� kil NIIII{ I IIIEIYtI' ' I'I °O 'o 1 0 6 ........... �f 1 {Ir C, •, ° •, °• 1 L O o ;o 0 I,II x i 171 I'I i II {i. - y m ti °o ' o° ' °o °o { Tv O O O In II O,. d, O ' O 1 ul -:m ;l�, yl, ILyI °1I OIII ' jlI O O O O ma I,iy o 'o 'o 0 ILL.- Ir I.'i A I IA I ' fA -' O O � O � O O O '1111�� 1 III I: O O O ; O O 111 � rL. �II 1 O o O O 0 uO1j11 Il �r 4 Ifll 111 y o o' 0 I, IG� 4 Il ih o 6 0 6 ..r...r. {°- 1 V ,rllt Il 1 7 IiP 0 N C f0 O V .3 ; L C O C U O V V E C N O C O V r_ O V N C N (O O iU0i IIj 111 ': O ; N CV iI1 1111 Y Y .. _4 ...4 . . 110 o 0 1 { I A- rt' ' _ I � yF , O O o o O O t�lln iIl" � O o o ; o 0 `Iltl, o'10 N l '�O 1 o�1 O ; N N dli �Il il. I'i O , O O �II O ' N N 1. Nrl it 0 0 Itl I , O ; O n. O FIB BPI iNi o ; O O m �I, u1 to N ro 11 71 !. o ' o o ILi 1 0 ;o ;C 0 N . I i Cill W o ; o �f 1 oo I, OVi4 1{ d Flr I IFIi ; o; 0 0 L W dl .. ;0 vt ' - ..4...4.. O i I_ O O g ; o 0 Il�d Ilh o , 0 0 JL' > O O . LLa., III 11 l ..4.. CD ' o ; o III I II ' F„ 'o '0 0 0 I i � 0 U 0 0 o ;o I 1 O o L� K 11 1 I '0 0 1 i - U1 r ; co, r � ! J ki I I II 1I � II 'C I Q N O C O V r_ O V N C N N O co T 1 r O :0 ; O G i L 1111 Y Y .. _4 ...4 . . 110 1 { O o o ; o 0 `Iltl, alt o; o ; 0 0 1 o�1 E- ) O , O O 1. Nrl it 0 0 Itl I , O ; O n. O FIB iNi to - I � fI ILi 0 ;o ;C 0 i Cill o ; o oo I, 1{ L W dl .. ;0 0 ii1I' O_ - ..4...4.. O I O CD o ; o O II ' F„ 'o '0 "J 111 �iO IIII o 0 0 0 it J I I i' I I- O o L� K o ;o ;0 0 1 i - ! J ki I N N O co T M O N O L) N i u� C 0 v c 0 V N �W �i 'o �i,Ir i, ' o ' N o ; cV N c4 UI I IIt �r ' 0 11.IIIaI �-� Ir I 4- if I'IG Id (j o o ' o O o ; o o illi� 1-H llil III,t "�h O (Il); 91 'I�jI o ;o ,0 0 o hil , p If t t 12_ Ilya L,I I II IEll I, I FI j; �I�III' O , (I N j111�I r m10,; uPf O ;O ;O 0 is I,a O , N O N N N' z U n !I 1 711 o; cv Cd IIII�1 {y ill! +ix ' a ' ll4i�1, Iop�Ilhl UI 4 7H a18yy Of F o 0 0 o ;o ;o 0 0 m lid! i,t� iIH 11F1j 111 +' `I o o � 0 0 �IcNltil; I,L o ' o 0 i. _..4...F- fin � L I III III A alb l�ikl- o , o ;o O la I � � O � O � � y II I +hill O f� i } i "6x ,I it 11 ils.i. °roll: 11 ii li' °o o ;p o. Q. �V 10 :I O 1, o ; 0 0 IIII �lil IIf 11111 11111, Ih1 ..4 ...4 .. INI °iC4, h51`4 ° ' o o "o o o I� p�jp�.- v 0 7FI I 'O 'O >F °f Yi oo�rrn; O ' d` LL aiFiJi 0 ' „I VIII 4i M lip" (IIiL i 4.. i Iit I I o o O O. ; O ; O O O III 11 . u1111 1111 ;'o o { 1' I filllll II II �t - O ; O ; O O IFfpx�li , O 0 r II iI1 I ilr! ' III;t�lllll'j Ef Gilt jll 16 m `o m '� 4.. iJT pon I a,N"+;(II if z 41i lii' ;o 0 - I�d,ii, I° 1 611 111 +I .. .'.. it Ih nlfl1; t'' Ilyl Ip f'i'll, m violu loi, % ; vro Jr m ,o U cc « F- II II�Jij1 2 in 4 0 r_ 0 0 U d f�0 .Q O 0 d n O i a� c O d' N N 0 O d' �i 'o O1311III O ;O 0 0 O UI I IIt i.• o ; o ; 0 0 o o ' o O I1 .,. illy O o ; O llil III,t "�h O (Il); 91 'I�jI o ;o ,0 0 If Ili "1i Ilya L,I o ; o ; 0 0 I, I FI j; •4 . _ .4 . . 1'I �b wit, j111�I m10,; uPf O ;O ;O 0 , VYI�:�TI Y I i. oGsx kbfwliri'} ll4i�1, o ; o ; o c IIQJ'l�Irlill+l a18yy lillgl, o 0 0 o ;o ;o 0 0 I'1i 111 +' `I o o � 0 0 I;O VII a i. _..4...F- fin FIl Oo 00 Co alb l�ikl- o , o ;o O Iihl +Irf G � 14,T• I � � O � O � � y II I +hill O f� i } i "6x ,I it 11 o ; o ; 0 0 O Ij{NJ `lirlr 10 :I O o ; 0 0 IIII �lil IIf 11111 11111, Ih1 ..4 ...4 .. Ildr {� f o ; o ; 0 0 7FI I 'O 'O Sy117 dll O vilyl� d` o; o ; 0 0 „I VIII 4i , 4... .4 _ ' ' jal�'J�llij Kij '' Z- I��IIrIr 11 f o o O O. ; O ; O O O Pl' 11 I, 1 1 I I filllll II II �t - O ; O ; O O III;t�lllll'j Ef Gilt jll Iol, Ilrnr, m `o m '� iJT I a,N"+;(II if 111 1u1,: .Q O 0 d n O i a� c O d' N N 0 O d' C O O C E i-- N O c0 C N I-- O ui N N O LO Mal i71t U, play I I,:��.�Ila. .4 .. Ih'lll 1 Olt I N Z II �13 is . o o II1j Z U{IF 1 ; NI � Ogrlltlh I_ 1 F�, M r M ,ZIIUi�IIi U IIIi � ufDi � � Z n IT- �t Ild i r a �ro � II Illl I, 00 ; 00. !�allll� I iiil ° ; o z �,IIIII III t il{ I t L t, � I a o . { 4 I ., ' i:1I tlfl 111 f�•. ' NI 'o ° ° Q I . I 1 1111 11 1 .: �aCG I II I �r1 0 ; o 81 1 L , C O O C E i-- N O c0 C N I-- O ui N N O LO w i 7 CQ G C O LO _..4...4...4.... O ' o :0 a (O i CR rn m t,l i '','11'11 _i o o .O ° O a Z O ; ...4...4...4.. p Z ; CJ O c; ...4...4...4.._ 4f o ;d ;0 ;d ...F... F...F... 't ,;' p o ...4...4...4.. ...r...r ... P... O ' o ' ' :C 01 m o E E O ;0 ;0 O Z ;0 o 00 pIJ�a � 00 m 00 C) - ' ' C, l"i co 10 10 -- '0 1i11+61AfJ mpOyll W Z __.4...4...4.. 0000 IZ}IV i ;c 00 a m Z ...F...F....F ..off ihlz` .. o '° mJ, , II ° o ;0 ............... C) o , o ' o ' ;O ; Z ;O 0 A�I�141 O O ' O 'o ' O 'o ' O a 'o o r z (t� I I I Ih '1 11.11 � CJ4 ' z _..4...4...4.... O ' o :0 a ...4....4...4... O :0 rn m t,l i '','11'11 _i o o .O ° O a Z O ; ...4...4...4.. p Z ; CJ O c; ...4...4...4.._ 4f ;o ;o ...F... F...F... 't ,;' p o ...r...r ... P... Iryl Ills ri 1 '•� 1 :C 01 m o E E +� F i.Nrf� '1 ro 00 Z d N a J A 'o A � ^L` c E W L N LO t v a rn m t,l i '','11'11 _i o I Iulix','ll blxllh 0 ZIICRI uid 4f jUtllhrf�iSf 't ,;' p o Iryl Ills ri 1 '•� 1 i.Nrf� '1 ro 00 pIJ�a � 00 m 00 C) - ' ' 41 -- 1i11+61AfJ mpOyll , 0, „J 0000 0000 IZ}IV i phi�i yl ll�' { ..off ihlz` 'tr�al:;j Ilt o 0 mJ, , II If I'"ill; A�I�141 �II II IIi i ml'hil l� °o °o r (t� I I I Ih '1 11.11 � CJ4 i ij °o o, °o oil' if�lnaa a Hthll I y�11V'1 lut ii 0 0 t:l Ir I'i - �+ r fiilf,l, N o. o. W RIP t I�III�If� N 1> Ot�1 s Ot ad �ll - 4 01r111f 71 1 ' 71 IIIIIIII�tI� Y�I� o O o O 10411 ifil1li i , r 1.. z I' 1'111110+1 III r IIUa XII �I I 1j ,III 0 0 1' l u' fl II j1'tt 1� II O o �J�IWt _m I '�! co r m 1 t4�il 'iitl' i�tl,l oo II'61� _ F- u N O Y k \ k � � \ � � � � 3 2 2 % k � � � 2 k \ � � � � 3 2 2 \ k § k ± !a 8 ownAW�,, oa.� � A"1111V �- ���} � A�} � = T: 40-, . � � \ �. � MEN � ; � A. /W) , M Rol % a o a � �:} k ± GA W W C J .G rn c W M 1 0 1 N D O (O (D a d C O c0 III �I a 1T ' � }I�I } ffiInf VII �k O lG I� R fr Il H1. II 07 - II �LLI I VIII' o. (�4:i'a I 1111 �r O ' O a ' 0111 F I'I _ o G' QINI II r i� o11a Il�i�i 1 - Ivt7�l it j��Ht o � o Il :' N 1 II I I i u0ir�l;lh � 71, � ,1111 t1� X11 1 z y,�C C ° ° ' IOi��Ga� Ue; Iy 1� 1 i �� h �' I'rhy� I 01 Ifs �f}lliyilq" %M�� III z tpf. �l+ � Ik llllll •• • til gull 1,1'1';! IIfJIIIhr �;I�r1'i II Aj lu nqi I�'LaII 0. f X171 ICI lo III��ir4 t N 'lI O ' O Z r�l 111, ° ;° Y i'11� r N Q ! lnll � O o y co ill r, I�if' o 0 F 9 {�41 ! aci 11111 l,fl'il I 4,1 N w N D O (O (D a d C O c0 III �I a 1T ' � }I�I t � I - II �LLI I VIII' O ' O (�4:i'a I 1111 lul ;Illi O ' O a ' I {IIII, j u�lll h� lfryr i Ivt7�l it j��Ht o � o ° , o z X11 z y,�C C ° ° ' Ill �jr H �� h �' I 01 Ifs �f}lliyilq" %M�� III z tpf. �l+ � Ik llllll •• • IIfJIIIhr �;I�r1'i 0. f 111 1 ' III��ir4 111111 I;, O ' O Z r�l 111, ° ;° Y i'11� r N Q z o Z Z y , Il 11i 1, oj'lll . y > _O frn� FIII11, ' Z a� Bi tilfj CIy 1 �I I`_ll Ol ,F III °° o o Z y ; • 11 }1 . I if � rlljll Z _ o ,,o I Z 1!II VIII tF ._L .. 1 hIt a o Z �'Ilillll 1 ° ° ,11 .r . F- IW llllll I I r:,li PI fill (: „oa91[; N N 0 O OD T I L Q U N d Q N 6 C III � I N f ' O ' o ' ' O Olr ,- ' l O O O O J � k =1 J i . U r ;111.: �:. {• Y �r1,1`; 0 ' 0 O m i I I . O 1111 i O '' � -' I1 �• O ' O ' O C col, {t i+ •.hh• I it i J_ s u N Y� r o ' O ' O O IIf i i 1 1 v147 Ii I O O m� I y II II O 1 i I� 7O , O ' O O a�: f• O ; O ; O O •w T I' N CF O > O iE i PII ' O O fl ' I II ,• � � O O O O I - 1 i� , ,'O C I {I 1� it 11j ill :_. 0 ;0 ;0 0 °1 I� Ii 'l lil• d�:. � � E �' m f l 1 V UJ L O C O� EU•ci°; m F• {I 1 1 1 00 ' �oo O ; O ; O O iD O ' O ' O O O ; O ; O O O ' O ' O O o ;o ;0 0 O 0 ;0 ;0 0 O ' O ' O O O ; O O ' O ' O O O ' O ; O G O ' O ' O O o o ' O o 0 ;0 0 O ' O ' O O O O ' O ' O O 0 ; O ; O C O ' O ' q O O ; O ; O C ' O O ' O O ; O O ' O O O O O O m � m m E a Yi C, E", ro, m a, o to co -o F Q U V a; J 0 IM I` N N O r �y i C� C C O rn h '��rl 'Llillll „' NOS 1�� d gr. cm '� (ND 4 U is � _. o ;o Z I love! - Ihl ,low t 1 O O l�t I I�al #4kb III ELI_ IrL# 1'I ,i Ili k' p Z i=.1�£1i;i41�1 �G N! p Ill�r r'In NII ..4 _ . NN o IIII 7 d�jl'IIUr Illkl, .. f' it r. II (, 0 {1 1'i Il4irf Yi II �I�lIII'I' Ijtiy I�il r ti I I�GII ', IiIG1 �I, z I` ��'yl 1A9'il rl�i � ?q1, IBM 11 JO ll. p� III ( it Izlhl�r 111111 � - VIII� 1p ti I1�a41� '3UI I Ia0-,h'allll C7 ,, i. III Ij Q i I � ..r. Iii 41 I, 1 h lot 1'00 lO� N I„Ii e N N (D �• ' � R � I � m 'OOOI�I lull JC4L'I O O O yy o r fl 11 �r.IIII�; IiLI%rr` i5 I 'IIII,G N C J A 'a .G L e G N � ti N N v— O O N 'Llillll V III all f ;. C\j (ND I love! - Ihl Zlil1 0 0 l�t I I�al #4kb III � �I IIIIIIII 5�t 1 OIGI'4 Ill�r d�jl'IIUr Illkl, .. II (, Yi II �I�lIII'I' �; ^yC Ililllf ��'yl 1A9'il rl�i � ?q1, IBM 11 JO ll. p� III Izlhl�r 111111 - VIII� 1p ti a I. h IIII Ia0-,h'allll �'ql 1 i I � II IY�?11 Iii 41 I, 1'00 lO� N 1� {I : N N (D � R � N 'OOOI�I lull �j I�Ij' O O �I I o r fl 11 �r.IIII�; II3, 11; 'IIII,G III' U F II�I�,1 C N m Illf N N v— O O N a C J N 1 N 061 }r O 00 W C O N to U { II N cm N '2 a sill l 1 I y y z 7+ .: I � II i � 1 I o f111h ?t ;o -_ V r to N U I a F' Do oo Z H �I ..4. = J Olr W l�t 't„ I Ili i V a +n z I� - C I is x F Hi III I 11 ..4.. of� °C I� ac i r I z 6 � 'moo W I' ca 4 7i: CM E r i O f c , , I ,Il+e ,II i I N L U I co Uil. m F- E W }r O 00 W C O N to U N N 0 O T N N '2 a O y y z II i � 1 o ;o I U I a Do oo Z H �I ..4. = J (V i +o a z I� 1� i i is x F a I 11 ..4.. °C a ac i r I z 6 � + I' ca 4 7i: E r i O f I ,Il+e ,II i I N N 0 O T N N W J N C6 C (D� Mi Il 141111 1 L ��ai I'M �II lN. cy ' Q °II }lly I Lo .- �� r IIl il'! r r N11(jNf {II G Z , oq CDR o o 9 �ai i It} ci 111 , - IFhII s Ii4! III I111FIIIIl1 �- IUa {1111, �1 I 0 o o N t t. �a�11, 1,II 11 I ltl i4u m A U.1;lIg I, Ilh OR f� ,1111 NI { yi IF�k1: F, i II Ei �!r IFIIII'o {�¢ R.0 II G1�II,' X N"�j!?j'It O 19 I� I IA yle�i:� i � tl A fi M �r iul C7I�r�� li` 1 1 }�1�14, t�11{ I�J fij la; {yl It ui rilhil ' 'y7 roNQ`i io •fir: xf9 ItA �'i•` Ht i 11} IN a ab1� m o 1 t Ijf v E F- Il�f I�r i IG�'EN�' 11 '}11,i I r fil �1ij1 urIi,ll ,''C i MIN 1 1 � � III 31 ; r,11g1;.'. R. �II d1r� ', if "INf E E �I NtA ��ai I'M �II U) Lo .- �� r IIl il'! r N11(jNf G Z LI I, Sri 9 �ai i It} ci OU1� !'. I111FIIIIl1 m m �1 I Ro III�II��Ita'Iq lit §I1 {I i * rlll. �!I ! ; f{ I f� ,1111 NI { �!r IFIIII'o {�¢ R.0 II G1�II,' X O 19 I� A fi M �r iul C7I�r�� li` dlr {yl It ui yl rt roNQ`i io •fir: p Ht i a ab1� m o 1 t Ijf v E F- Il�f I�r i IG�'EN�' 11 '}11,i I r fil _0 W N N O N N G \ _ ) _ \ \ \ 0 / / \ \ 0 _ % co \ 0 3 < ) + 2 g \ / » / \@ }\ E 0 > @ \ \ c�� g� R' _ 0 c U) ■ 2!ƒ .\ \ CL ; : / o 2 © \ 0 °ƒ S / Co - / ■ 2 k '} 2 3 ^ j ) \ 2 @ \ j S ƒ / \ 2 A k o" } / / / § / \ k ° , 2 L/ $ \ \ \ c — t! \ % . � k ) t & o U- ® / y \ A I = 2 \ / e o y ~ ■ $ \ 0 o § § ° G / ■ � l % � R « 2 ¥ � e ® @ : c 3= E c \ ) c e \ \ / 2 / \ 0 0 ƒ CD t .mil$ o ] § o § \ % @ fl -r- ƒ 2 \ ) o k \ 3 . . 3 a§ c 2 uj /'®/ 9 J J/ c _ ; k o Q t 3 D 2\] 3 . � : • k k \ 0£ e @ Q£ e e k a q D 0 M a u 0 0 0 0 0 _ % LL CO OD O E N c _o 0 E 0) 0 `m Q. C a� N C CL Q LO N n. 1- a� U .0 O 'y. E, W a E C 0 a 7 y' C O U 0 CV c 0 t N c U a E c c O U L U) c O U m G 111411 �f� Illi 111 'O O I��t1�rlj1 CY 'I' W z Ui �I i,. Y ,'a B I (f QII rill Z'I "k�,j rlrt j c, o Q z f Ji111I'I "41 l uk l�l+`d Ily �'rl�' 1`IIIi M Q UI b a1 'tal l{Ir tlil ��I• IT 1 ',ro o z � �j _ o INI�ly�4 l�1 I r '�illrll' :✓;l�'III m(pGu a TF�N{ o ¢ �t Z J�l1ry � li o �ti�'- o Z 1096au�uLt ',�„�J 1 h�rgl „itt �� c a t , I ,j NRp, ui 11: �IINq.I W: rill , ' �11�1 (R � a z i rl9 n n> a�JG:I `r piggy' a z ,11 OIh! Iao t, gllrl�ill t J'1 III t, I� cq cq a z lill��l X41: -- r�l O t S Im5n r, N, o, gal; r iLLl,11141rv; � �yl: Try li m. °o z II it ,1 1 d Ii lil lqr' (6 z ol�, ; m a Z� ti f li I N Z N a WIfi;I1: IrFq tIF z F 1 t+ r � r4,t rl'hi'I,`�a , N f Iiti'�II', NI RIK II.Ii w T 0 N r.. O Q Q. O ca d O C C Q d O lE n N INft�'S_ jklil Cl) aY S V N 'IU tflrE,� 41 ; �T I a`IK !Z'I{ rl slid ; O ; O Ir, I X 15I ,�IIr 1l d� - ..4...4 .. O ' O ' co ' ' IiI li'Ij 5 -� SI ' =i} O O co p O O co O -- F....4.- I F ICJ I l I ,N c �• al IIno �I'r Ipl�' III , , O n - IIbINI�I III O .In . nV vMi I'V4. II NJf _ Ill 41 OI I rl � '�Ifh�l. p— ~l III I.mI{GF O O d.l N ro '- o ' O '.O O Id ' L a t 'N�I 'III I I O O O O O O O O LL 15 1 r N N O O O , O O IUn Ir :i !l l -i. 4 f Lo I F OI: II�II III O 1 ' 0 0 rng y 0 � O O II: M O ro NJ II RA O ' N N o I i t o � o 0 0 S I I I, i� I N1 IL ' 04 Ilii ' N N a, II: ills O co u l; I I r0 J I ' 00 ' O ' O I I o; o 0 0 (lilt • III; ..4...4 .. o ; o m F:. O ''o ' W O ' O ' n X O is co co Z -. 6 0 O OIIi Qail,h ? 4 0' o ' ro to d; O ' O ' O 100 O O , O (7 of I O O � n 00 rn m rn U L i- - I IIII, n W Fo" N U 0,: ^'- III � Q W c 0 0 F I � I I U C Q d O lE W .F� U C 0 U O C"J 00 0 0 co M v O I O a`IK O ' O ' co ' ' M _ 11. O O O O O •O O -- F....4.- I O � O` ICJ I l I I l VO• i� O n ..� . ZV� O .In . nV vMi I'V4. NJf _ M ' ' M p— ~l III O O O O O O O O d.l NF O ' O ' N ' ' N L a t 'N�I 'III I I O O O O O O O O LL 15 1 r O Lo I F OI: II�II III O 1 o ; o ; 0 0 M O ro NJ O ' O ' M O 'O ' O L'2: a- o , o p o to I N1 IL ' > Olt I I.i II ' N N a, II: ills , 0 0 LL l; I I r0 J I ' 00 ' O ' O O o; o 0 0 o ; o m ri O ''o ' W O ' O ' n X O is co co Z -. O , O O O OIIi N ' O ' y i d; O ' O ' O 100 O i rJ I a L' rn m ro W Fo" U 0,: W .F� U C 0 U O C"J 00 0 0 co O v 7 C V N 7 CN G C M M O N C O E O N M i/ G 0 V 7 N C O U N E c Illll�llli'EI`i, I`p{,Illi 'ro CO O co co IIir1A 11'I o r,u! Il }I 1'I I m 0 co 1l i Y'�IL' . r a r f tiL .E �gIII�I�G ;uI I ZI1l I�111,j1pA ri.: I I I l l I i -�ti Ill,t�l W M Ulla yA ;0 O r o .I, Okl,{ G! al I 1� OI i�lll it �M ill ��.n, f'''III r s6 Yy I III, tlI I j I I r 1 lU 1��1, o ..F. NI11 !Y I}O q'i ' O III li ��`S I Iti Ir}rl'il IIV� I2I'I�111 • •... I'llidkhllai� �l`�, MITI; O ; O O C5 r r , I It � I I O O ��Jli Ii�� u o O ` O ` O 0 ta��Il ;: o i o i o A Ir"T 1 4. N V 1 >lln A N 1 f O O °1 ill I O ` O O 3 a T O ; 0 ; O O LL !I�ul M I 0. n It -IIII iIMII:II I��I ° �L �I C W�III 1 n O i IdLIJ II ,II,i i_ oFha_ 1�`f O ''t v O ' 9 LL m 1 O l >lo`4rt lei , I 71 L- rn M rn M O�Ggq7i.' i 0 W�lyltf tl i l r21 IL LL'h I ,Iq L Pi�L I Til Fli J Ij .4.. lyl 4 11 ' N N ; ; 0 0 1 J l:.. IIC � , � I'llil�ll�4L1k1 1111 I 4 -- C Ui'li 1111 i Vii' Iill 11 N Lq Vli�ll U't'Itl ill I(U�It� ILA IIII.. 1() °O 0 Y� l O ; ; O I I Iolk f t' 7,1 IFr' Oltilllll rn rn Z# ZIAi C6 6 c °o °o II "Fy�l�l(' I III�I II, Ih 1164; 0) 0 0) W 11, it II I; 0 ; 0 ; 0 O ,Ill III All O 4ri,fy�l I 4 > I X o I I O N I,111� �tll I�b�IN O „�ti. C , ; y v/ O c O V 7 C O U 13 E c lllll i W;1;;: Q, Il .E �gIII�I�G ;uI I ZI1l II IIIK' lll�l ri.: I I I l l I 14�� ..4 ...4 .. Mil II IIIIt �lll' O ' O It rll I r o .I, I 1� OI i�lll it f'''III r s6 III tlI I j I I r NI11 !Y I}O q'i ' A • •... O ; O O o 1..1 BIZ! 1 rly CY ry =iIt O ` O ` O 0 ta��Il ;: o i o i o 0 x �II 'ruSrNll ill I O ` O O 3 a T O ; 0 ; O O LL N o �L �I C W�III IIISi;. Illy n O i IdLIJ II ,II,i i_ o 0 6 9 O O ` O O l O 0 tt U Lr) W ` O m W l r21 IL LL'h I ,Iq L Pi�L O ; 0 ; 0 O ; ; i O. O O O � 0 0 0 0 ; o ;'0 0 0 C li 11 U't'Itl ill I(U�It� ILA IIII.. 1() °O 0 M. l O ; ; O °o mo ZIAi 1' i. '. ; o ,o ,6 c II "Fy�l�l(' I III�I II, Ih 1164; 0) 0 0) W 11, it II I; 0 ; 0 ; 0 O ,Ill t I I O N P 1ilIIA li O „�ti. C , ; y i III, ��IN r m X11 co m ° = , > . HiAnll [I 1I I I Ilt�r t II I I,,14,: 0 0 �t M O N G O E 0 N M C C O V L N O V 1 MINN, ;mom, 6) ; OD N V ' J OD O Ih II: o ,v a IUIIi S N l 5o fF i O iIlIJ l JI ] 1 IpIII ..4 . . illy 11) "zr.b hill? I- ; oil IU'ill �IO .�IV �I 121 11'. 0 1�1 Fltk', a 1 ! 'N v 6 I -•4-- III VII i � O Nm t ,� f110 4 o ag a fN ,_ O 1 t 1 'Z �k' �� F ii O O ' O N ltl1L � O o I'L o I' O1'_ ' ,I,: il' Ih=u 1 I- Ix an, rl�l , ` N ii1 �O t NS° 1 " o 0 N u; � �I.: O O O O �a 4. l l; Now I,i . t - O yI !>IN N _,mom ni r w ai � ' al � ..4.. jll" r o 0 am III V. I� ; 0 O O O I LII t S , O 2 ] rX 7 a; IBM 1� f n. I 0 i I J N O ' O ' ' O 11 m', O O I 11] UII, m 'O I V. 1 00 0 0 LO ;mom, 6) l Lr; ! l' N V ' 10 :N �li Ih 14 N l 5o fF i ..4 ...4.. l mYS hi I I , "zr.b hill? I- ; IU'ill li�� o ;o ;0 0 r a 1 ! 'N v 6 G 'MOM III t ,� o ag a , m 'o ;r 'Z �k' �� F ii • ' Taw D , I�hI1 y ' ,I,: il' hl f ` N ii1 �O t ;M I ism 1 " I,i . wdl - yI !>IN N _,mom 1 1 LLd SIR, 4...4 -- I 0 III 0 S , O a; n. 6 0 J O ' O ' ' O 11 O O O O ; O O O 1 - I I� 1 :0 ' O W ' 0 N 0 i "ilk'Ilil y.• nQ Y , r ir1i o ;o ;0 0 C jell V •r • •r 00 0 0 LO M O N c L C) M M C O r_ O v C O V d E C I'I 111,17+ 1li'f . Co d ,I Nlq tiL�i I IIII O ' oi A f Y' , !u 1pq vi 'i., I�I11 yll" it�� I 1 i III ". Ii!iJi,ii4! mi t Iz ��f i � I 111 ,.I - •4 _ . 0 40 0Ilal; O _,� I� I� L 'A lF1 U L IIu ; 6 0 1 I� - 1lU5n' �JI l: II11�it I' �h If �! ui!r` I C ' _ ' ��IILI moil 'm Lc �•Y '� � III( OV'� ., iNII�l1li �ur o Lo 'o '0 0 OII'Iln�l UIY� , i�t,l o O O .0 O i�l it I IlIII( 7ro N I I V O ' O ' O 0 I 'r�jI IhI I r1 !IXc 4 l'I:'O ' a• V �ii� ll III O r- d !W d A��' �1 L N 11' I 1 1 • -4 - - h1 y I�Ii VIII, �� O ' O ' r 7 aa1i! tl IS O O IL F! i' � y I 11. -..O 'o 'o O �a{ o ' n II 1�4 �•:.I I ! I � ..4 -. IIIIhI 'o, �L to it =1� 1 1 o ; 0 �yl j °o o4ri�l J I °o ' °o ' °o rnifY��I�Aj ' iIr P' °ILi All n n Illr'�fI�Y !� I I II'lll, - - -4 -- IIII{ IIj Irlr� IIp old' ai ili ,. !jI ill�a! ilbt 411 X III 111I� 4 -- I III �L hit �I� 1 1 �li III I�1 tV m of Il t' Ilu ,! 4IIII: , I JI YjJll� 1, UO, I'll o ' o ' 0 0 III i III l'I �� f7 dti!ii lai;lip iF1,, ..4.. I I u 1 1' 161 N N ark,, .; .! ''„'' o ro I11I!�III II, I,' ! U71 I� 11I1j1 f 'mi ,l N. ' O r 7' I�i'Ih i mf1i Z ' F 'I�lil +11 . IUD LL ' O L�lll�,l II,' i' III O C O v C d Cm G C !!I11Q1 h I t I Ilil 'COI I(I O O Y W O 00 C f Y' , !u 1pq vi 'i., yll" it�� I Z�1 Ii!iJi,ii4! mi III' VIIIj'� IIU ,.I O O O 0 40 0Ilal; O _,� I� I� L 'A lF1 0 Ip''ll�!�i ��IILI �•Y '� � III( OV'� ., o Lo 'o '0 0 n VIII fJF o O O .0 O i�l it I i Imo_ 7ro N I I V O ' O ' O O j I 'r�jI h01 Ili {u O ' O O 0.1 4Ij1; o , o ; o d ,ii I�Ii VIII, �� O ' O ' r 7 O f lift � y I 11. -..O 'o 'o O �a{ o 0 0 0 (II h'IE IIIIhI 'o, �L to =1� 1 1 o ; 0 0 °o o4ri�l III °o ' °o ' °o rnifY��I�Aj ' iIr o ; o �0 0 Illr'�fI�Y !� I I ' i��61H11 IIII{ IIj ; . o o O. h old' ai ili ,. !jI ill�a! ilbt , X III 0 III Z ,l I III �L o O co o O o O 11 11���I1III �li III I - 14,1 . _.4 ...4 .. 1�,1 I JI YjJll� 1, UO, I'll o ' o ' 0 0 , 1 III l'I o ; o ; o O dti!ii lai;lip 7x,11 iIIIIrI(I 1' 161 _ � Y c p. I11I!�III U71 o S .7 �� ~ �F�I1 r =�' 1116 bl li 4�IAa I'I {IIII.!. w T 0 M O N C L V M V) cn C O C O v O y C O L) N G O O V 7 N C O U d 2 00 r 0 0 r- oo ;o ;m 0 0 o�111 o �d �0 I Z I (f11II`hIl NII' ' ' O rU jlt� t.i! ii ' O4+ I � l O O 'O al"ll�I ifO�G I11II I I4 li ;ll�lf'S}n II �1lfi 4f. IW cip 'Mor ;0 ;0 0 II,1 " I II `L III xxa WTI I f -1 - O O O O IF _ _F _ • _F _ r�+ mO III;I oo ' ct o 00 -tea o ;o ;0 0 f I °rol 0 o 'o o' 0 0 o ; o .0 0 II O Ii I. 1' °o o ,0 ;0 6 J ' goal o ;o ;0 0 I li: • ..F ....4 _ . a III II o ' o O :U fl =' O O O O I O ' O 00 IIII ij1 OJ .0 o i. -I1 I f � fir•: jp'1111 it � J I t I li III d 1' t C O O �II�I I I 00 r 0 0 r- co O N r. V Q U M� W d' C'7 C O C O V L C O U N N C III 11 I O N O N N t I a m v I i I 1 II III It 12 1�1(I II� cq M IU III, , II� O O �f. �G7E" to 1y 61 -� ity ahlN I 1� cq M PH N Or oiElr�' I i� I� '� C, Q'4 III " (O 10 Id Flir i 1 iJ r, ; r N 10 �; W11I O O �(�0 W d{ I 4; N 1 ( 1 aF'IL fl; r lL 10.'llr � AIi II O co 111 I� KIII NA�1 P jtl;Ill iI', O' O 4F II 1 1111 �1 1�� I'II1 I I , r O co e I �irirl 11111 ill 111 O II yII -; F illij i 0 OSIi .{ _ klll.,: In to Zil N N I� IU I�! It�lyF �. MI III III i I I!II M co hAi� o_ f JI'I I�1.: Itl I rl II 4 N 'IIGO• o 1111i�Y1� O I IU�II N O C O V C O V N C 0 O r lm r d' Onl m�a O , O O O O ' O O O O 4...4 0 ' 6 ' N 0 o Lo tl O O O O O O O O O O ' O ' O O o ; o ; o O O .0 'o o O O O ' O ' O O O 'o 'o O o N fo00 'm 'O O O O asaQa O ' co ' O O O O O O � O F 00 T Q 00 CO O N C V C O U tm 7 m ri N G O c 0 ti G 0 U Q N cn 4 O G 0 v N G 0 U W IN' (VI''II 1 I O , , m}} O co co t' Ittj N N 2 ii CV 10, 1 7-9, I 1� loir o ` 1 L o ' °o ' °o, cq M 0 mr Si i-: 'O { Nil O l 1� J C—I�II dr �1311I� 1' r - kI p m C) I Y, m m p I� I 1 T �fN f 11 Or Ilnl I11 : o 0 o 0 I�p171'; 1 Il is O O mil �CI tl��: ,V�tiyI IN m �- r .... LOO �H I. cLo a L_ 11 4 0 r e J I ; o ;o ;0 mot; a ark . Lo �XjJdN ili r jilt I a iMil O ' o ' O LI 'L I a i L O O ki'�l L rl:r >I J� 1 aN ig" O O O 'o OII If ' I aj O�ij'1 ,�IaII -. c10p b T IEI VIII, Ili O ' O 1 0 O o . ;o c I� # a o o l 0 +AI i IL o 0 IIh !• I { I O O ; O 11� L Lo 1 4I1 F I I� - 1 1 10 Ln 0 1` ��Itl m ri Qx I jig -� I` o 'N 'm O ; m ' O N m p I R 0 , .O ; O O - F- lit m y } 1 co ' in p[ VIII I, o ; o ; 0 cn 4 O G 0 v N G 0 U W IN' (VI''II 1 I O , , m}} O O IN CV 10, 1 7-9, I o ` 1 L o ' °o ' °o, MI -'' 4, Ie 0 mr Si { Qrr 1 l C—I�II dr t0 7 N Q. p I� N T d ONE, lei ,V�tiyI �rl�r'.J aU AP1 .... �9 "�dllplili, Ilrjll.. °o °0 0 r e o ;o ;0 0 a ark . 11 a iMil O ' o ' O O 'L I a i L O O ki'�l L rl:r >I ' ' aN ig" O O O 'o O o aj o ;o ;0 0 i?a, VIII, Ili O ' O 1 0 O ;o c I� t °6 � `m ' O ' O ' O• ' ' O tic. o o 0 0 NQ'la 11 O O ; O O 1 I -N OBI Ln 7 Qx I jig -� - o 'N 'm O ; m ' O N m Z I i 0 , .O ; O O - m y } 1 co ' in p[ VIII I, o ; o ; 0 0 vi it I, r , I ICI I M N rn c CL IR M 0 c O 0 U 3 c O V N E c k 1, 11 �f l iii 1 c O ' 00 N�llfl"�ii. rl;l ��I N ' o. o a Ui1�; 1J1IIS+4 ik ift {A I I{- L � xuii ; O r1 {n; iZF! IY'� Iy �� 1 l f 15C;'ll'�I! I rIi' N ' N Ci 1lk, Lb'i IIII O ; o � aY I�: o ;o ;0 0 7N4u` iOld�I 'l I� ...F ...4 .. iO 15� � �lif �ai`ihV�ll�h 11i l�j N N {Z OUIn1l jjl'l l o ro {ill 141 if yf '(�I� a ; 2V 11 1Ill1I�;� Ii�lil a! i i _ •4 _ air r lit:LJIII lOi� to I' jY. y' . aaoglo I� al ,�tir�i III +JI 1r.s,� • • • • N Oo N IJ �i�l. ; oo '. oo In��1r71�i�t . AI f O ; O 111111' "'�I�r 'II�II ill�{II�11 4.. t�t'�hGylfli 1 11 N3I1Ii 111 N I o N rr ! I O 1 VIII Illy 111.f l l hll i. > Nei I I�Y1� I O o' O o KI o t 1 i k �1 r 01 j 141ti� ' N ; O N D la�yy � o ;o ;0 0 fi ., AZ II, ...F ...I. . . rool�i i. N O N A; o ;o ;o o 1111 Lll� N I � h 1 !o F y >OII 11 O N ' O ' N LL��T -t� I{far� o ; o ; o o ' 4 .. 4N�il! FYI Illryf IIIIp Yi N 0 N 0 rn tY9�i +; t - 1 1, O o o0 0° WI rgit n I I': I YVI h IU,ya; If 14 rn of It�)1j1 1,IIAf ..4 _. N N kOdF i f III I? I Ellf N N 1 Z IS fl " II •- � r hl il `. tII ��rif a; I1 fY III�,flyl.� lyF'`i � il4il I Io t6y ` M o M �ifr 14' 11; i t I� N ; O N aetira Dili o ;o ;o' o v: hkY ,ZEN ' it q, ii Y _m it(!44 Ol�' D F a U1 � O FD- 15IIIii��l 4w U) 4 O c O V 7 c ♦0� V d E c w I Ilow4r` ,i,�tl o o ' m o ; o ; m � a m Ui1�; 1J1IIS+4 ik ift cq °o 0411 I�: o ;o ;0 0 'l I� ...F ...4 .. IO'r�F �lif N N �E jlluf�'! G,1 In Ii0 �� 1 {ill 141 if O ' o o ; o ;o) m 2V 11 I4IYI air r I� al �ml'p.Gl ��i 1r.s,� • • • • '��Iim II ry ��j� oo '. oo ~ir f O ; O r I IfNY +lil 1II� ' ' O o' O o KI o t 1 u If�rj �1 r o mitit C o ; o , N. N D la�yy o ;o ;0 0 51'1; ., AZ II, ...F ...I. . . W , A; o ;o ;o o 1111 Lll� N I � I�I'Ihil a , i 'i'il�l ll O N ' O ' N LL��T -t� I{far� o ; o ; o o o0 0° WI rgit it 1lt1 �; o ; o ; o o a; I1 al 11 f; o o if aetira Dili o ;o ;o' o v: hkY t ON,, Y +� 2i F .i r 0 0 0 T M 0 N a cn O C O V 7 U) N C O V N l�6 00 00 NO kl�i Ji711 N '. o N v C a Zti IiI SI .. Ur1hf G f r. o � o 'D - 966 B.cV �If1Fi INn N W ' Cd Cal C, f v Iff l , a o U M Al NOI;'I IIi. N 'O N a 1m!f�lra � - -� -- ;I Iii �� �NI Ilff N O N L4LIIE 'I , O I 'I rng = r LL af, f •.4- O N cC Q a N ' O N tq Iti _ F a O O O I N O N I��.(IE 1Ii: I I ! � O IIIJ 4 - m,i rn t'• f � ' 0 0 ..4 U h, m of N N M ' O M U I cV o tV f I Fi. rn cc c I I i d �> o I O C O v 7 L C O U d N O ' O ' N I N ,m m ...4 ...4. -. O O 0 0 alana m N o ; o ; m C, ' C, ' o o o ; ; C. 0 O ' O ' O O � O � O O O ' o O ; O o ; ; 0 0 O ' O ' O o ; o ; 0 0 O ' O O o O O O O O ' O ' O O O � O � O O O O ' O ' O o .0 ; 0 0 ._.4...4.0o. maea 0 0 ,^ o I^ o ' o .o .0 0 m a O O ; o O 'C; ' � O ' 3 's o 0 0 T T M O N C O v R N L a m ri cn C 0 C 0 v 7 N C 0 E C 1 4 t 0 ' o , 0 o 0 ayUy� �Ihll d ;o Iku 00 11111 III (z�h�ll ' I�IIII� F I 51' III Y��r, i) I II IiIP'F y15NNI O IIII1'J n, I �� 1 0 0 0 O 15 , O O YU 11� .n (D 00 O a4ht,I, I •b IN O IN l3 111>•,',. O ' O ' rot�i`yl�l � t I ,l I WTI! ..4 ...4. _ Ii 1, 01' 1 JJI � i111111'I l �Iil O 1 I', �k N co i 11. y d `�I7 �yll i 1.111f II O9f'I'li {O II fl l�. I11 I {17Ir; O ' O' O o. ; o ; 0 ICI +�1 I �,,r E '""11i1T1ti Utt � -. NI t11 m II 1;: 1 0 ' ' 0 0 0 oo 0 o ; o ; o 0 o 4Et i t 11,11 lCf, 1 W >I� ill I it igi j O ' O .00 O i xx IW ail': IyII -�, II i o ; 0 1 0 III >'N 1 li l N O a F�.j IjF I} it rl, l o; o , 0 0 � 5 1 OIII I II'tl_ a I o o.. o 0 11 o ;. o c 1111} Ifi. , 1. O ' O ' O o ;o ;0 n N ! Of I 1 LJW hl. 0 N 0 Lail O �k,lhl�u o ,0 0 O O O o 114,jlllk �I°J1il yl�r l it l ' 0 f ,1s IiI1G o O O O Ili, itllll -. --4 -- W Z101 AO i t I I O 4 j UJl a rl'1 1 m .- m r I l lLl o l I f{ II'� `III oo ' °o Il�I o ; o ; o 0 li ' I 'Il''II OIn, ZI 11' t rn a rn r111' 141 III �: � ' F II f I U �� lO rylkll _ICI no I��ylll {; I; „1 � 1 I .VIII II II AwII!'ill L.�IJy giii N - p �o j'1�f,i11i1 • I II a', t ' 12 I ell t Lll L) � 1 I,III O C 0 V i U) C 0 N C Lt;II F {(fl II ,��til III , 1: ftlJs 0 ' o , 0 o 0 ayUy� �Ihll d ;o Iku 11111 III (z�h�ll ' I�IIII� F I 51' III Y��r, i) -4 ...4 • - O ' O ' O IiIP'F y15NNI O U 14fi�11 I �� 1 0 0 0 O 15 !I7 .n (D 00 O a4ht,I, I •b IN O IN l3 111>•,',. O ' O ' WTI! ..4 ...4. _ I�p �le11r51 I', �k O O `�I7 �yll i 1.111f II O O II 11 a I— I11 I {17Ir; O ' O' O o. ; o ; 0 O 0 l r1 il4 L I �,,r E NI t11 m II 1;: 1 0 ' ' 0 0 0 oo 0 o ; o ; o 0 o 4Et i t 11,11 lCf, 1 W >I� ill I it igi j O ' O .00 O 1�, ii q- III: �ol;� IIIIIa ,a4� - ' ' III O O N O ' O o N O a F�.j IjF I} it rl, l o; o , 0 0 � 5 1 OIII I II'tl_ a I o o.. o 0 11 Ol�'lI'I g all (, Fl i,l P'r O ' O ' O o ;o ;0 O 0 O �k,lhl�u IQI'I�II) I lIII�11 O O O o 114,jlllk o ' O ' O 0 i III�� i IiI1G o O O O Xlll� I1 {�I'M 'tlII{II O ' O ' O W Z101 AO i Ih 14 O O 0 ' �. O it II II' e •__4 •.• -4•• sl EIy blll II I f{ II'� `III oo ' °o I I o ; o ; o 0 I I 'Il''II IIIIIiIIIII�Ii IIh h1' Io c `o l,. ' F II f I U Ihil�l +llll �I' I I; „1 � 1 I .VIII II 0 0 N T M O N r. /O V 3 v t L a M N C O r- .2 V N G O U 1 6 1 cn O r- .2 v N C O U d N lot - I it U r t fl It. `r ; ;o 0 ,furl O j' , 4 . NNEi ti lill � I I + 3 I Oil ' A R 1 O ra I ::_ I Fcl' 4 .. .4 . , of I,f RUN, I 1 01 b Nf4 1 11 p Fu u } ,- MCI -,- F...F_. �_1 11 7 Q� Itill 11 oh�i Uy ,ll , U �- OiI } N O Fn 1 11 , t r fi� lLL1J1 IIII � I . NJ.I LL a s_ r til Ft I- It v F 'Mat4.iI ;I I O O -F flit o ;o ;0 O1, UK 4. m Ili -_ I O =_ lX a IG,I'. N I.O N ..4 .. .4.. Jaw LL a.�. ilLp llr, o o; 0 0 =q gal: NNE II I III O :s ' O O 1 IIII; A O O O O NI 1 - L ' o O 0 IIt .4 ...4.. O O O G X11 I'r I' '(O 'm fp �!'I IO m N IZI Ifi' (V fill IIII V F 1 I awl d I�IIIh iI udJII'I r :6 m � a�i � ° �� .I jj J , m z ti16f IO) - O , O O H mill Ills. I { ii Q cn O r- .2 v N C O U d d .Q O R* N .O CO G W C O d' 00 T Q co - I :li T - a NNEi ti lill � I 15�� j 3 I , 'r A R I I,f Q "ZIU1 rid ✓r• O , ° , r Fu u } ,- MCI -,- F...F_. �_1 11 7 Q� Itill 11 oh�i Uy ,ll , Fn Inl it If +1 �,: Ft F 'Mat4.iI ;I O :s :s O -F flit o ;o ;0 0 y Or; I lX a IG,I'. I.O a ..4 .. .4.. Jaw LL a.�. ilLp llr, o o; 0 0 =q NNE II I III O :s ' O O ,-oi I Itl :i� fll I'I O O O O H 'rI IP 0 IIt .4 ...4.. O O O G i� III l Iy+ IO O ' o ' 0 0 fill IIII V F 1 I iI udJII'I mil m � a�i � ° F d .Q O R* N .O CO G W C O d' 00 T Q co c O E 0 C E E U) N of C O Q C N M O LO co r 0 T IQ I'I t hl4".' N N Z IIh� I ', i ..4.. M co =Ifl Ci �I��i� II5 l' O O O ; O: Z IBC yIII 1 Iill r, NTH, �4 - o� N;Ilrl I II Z I I yyy m NR #a yf Q IN� ay �fi .4. III u S 4 4� tJ i N' IIP fin+ -Ep,. Mo , mo Q p Z �1A1 I S 1: y N. N N O ; O J F r p o Z LL L t: ii. Ijl f �I lN -.tllr a T I h.., � III � ,otti «.orl 3a N ;L Q III; III - - -4 -- i el ill � Ul i��I 05d III hl t I i'ril I ��Ijt� 1.:C6 6 z Ilil��lil I I F ' oiS I ZiIJ� Ih'Y': o O z u�l l I 'UYrf III 114 Q I ; I I Pg� ••r•r. 1rItF I I J 411 1;• I I rn ;c o hillii� isgiiii �d E � c F It�Illll IIhI,14j1F� �� c O E 0 C E E U) N of C O Q C N M O LO co r 0 T C W d O J 1�II1 N t i WI I' ` ii � coo !oo { }lr.. IWSg . lOy U Ir.S 1'al �f <o to O �t IIII #Irk t+ ` {� Y s L_�Ifi o 0 UI ..4... 0 2 INil 10. ° ' O Z c + 14ir a lO i Or cif { U Pd I5 I a op O n a I�ll�gi { I mll`P lil �rfl �i . 00 N� a MI iCil� 00 ' o 0 Li � r p 09 ata O i ahil o O ; O 0 � {I, � 11 N I +tp j I I in 00 Q z p N Io)� t I lI col Ittr'Ilit o �Ir � CiN r, Q O� � wata , Z �I 1,� ..4... y O N O aFYy =, r� a, O Ems L� i Vii. O a r o Q Z t al .D Ili I ila O It E 1 a Ija1 1� l' L Ii � Z 0 l I ail I -�I = 0 1 111 I I (atf � 11 ii it t 00 ; 00 Z i 1 p ! 0 0 I i ' O O SEE I 0 , Dili r 'til `. 6 II+ I 1 s Z 5 I t ---�-- U 'Ii it a z „I 'l l U D N 'O; ftl Ill C7 C7 m m , y � i E F U i Pill Z c Z N C c� J L C W C N M Lo 16 r D I+ I I � ICI 2 WI I' ` ii � coo !oo fAj I ( IWSg . 1�f IP I fit 1i II O O IIII #Irk t+ ` {� Y s L_�Ifi o 0 UI o 0 N k O'r ' � a U ME c + 14ir a cif { 1 wl op O n a I�ll�gi { I mll`P lil �rfl �i . 00 i {I,1 tit NIA -It'll MI iCil� 00 ' o 0 Li � O i O o .roC x_ If 0 0 � 11 I +tp j I I p N Io)� t I lI Ittr'Ilit o ,�t�+ li I i y O N X d i d3 I O O Ems al Ili E 1 II 1` 0 0 oI'I 0 Ili I� 1011 1 ail I -�I = 0 1 111 I I (atf u I i p ! 0 0 Z i ' O O SEE 0 0 Dili r 'til `. 6 6 1 s L; 1'I. •. 'l l U Z, m y � i E d 16 r .V L Z J A A m d c w N ui 0 1 N O c� a O a C O ca r �O 00 T T i 2 U a N (C C � - - - N O ' HasO R. ' ZlE,l z , 3 �pf all . 4 =1 En o ; 0 0 0 U k �jI1I m 4 �tid{ 11 JI�'�I rolll ail z u� II t III'' m0 I J li,i 'OO °o O tl III n� ' o o Im vlMIRI �IIt. NI � II . II•�i1 Of A.i J t . 1i Ip �11 �F i I rt t -'�19 II Ir ..... I ( 114 III . INN I ...4...4. ��-O b',� h i I) I SI _ j' k ' ' 1 L. LL,P � I � N o 'o '0 a k Min1f: o ; o ; 0 6 0 jl.i 11 1 a F . W O ui f .......... II is o bald: a ;o ;0 0 I , LLaa 11 IY �.... ..4...4.. :I O 'I 111 � .. 4...4.. O � 0 0 I -j O - ' v I I 0 0 + _ O IS I Ail O ' N ' o N Ot; '0 0 1 I . I� I SOME v' N O o o. c o. -o u. Q A 111: lC �l 9 �L - -- - -- -- N O ' R. I still 2 IIY� all . , U �>C En o ; 0 0 0 m U �tid{ 11 JI�'�I roan" I u� II t III'' m0 I J li,i 'OO °o i ,tI it I Iq 11II QF,,', � i I) 14 r, KIM17 rt t -'�19 II Ir ..... I III . INN I ...4...4. �1W cj il l h i I) I W a j' k ' ' 1 L. LL,P o 'o '0 a k Min1f: o ; o ; 0 6 0 jl.i ! . d II is own I , IY �.... ..4...4.. t I� 1 111 � ...4...4.. 0 0 ' v I I • ' + _ O IS I Ail O ' N ' o N Ot; ! t6 SOME v' N O o o. c o. -o u. D L O 00 r 0 r` r L N N Y G C� yr G h 0 00 d �F+ y (C L C O C� G T 0 00 r 0 0 00 r HEALTH RISK ANALYSIS FOR DIESEL EXHAUST ST. MARY'S PARISH NEW JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL BUILDING PROJECT Regulation The California Air Resources Board (CARB) regulates vehicle fuels with the intent to reduce emissions. Diesel exhaust is a serious concern throughout California. The CARB identified diesel engine particulate matter as a toxic air contaminant. The exhaust from diesel engines includes hundreds of different gaseous and particulate components, many of which are toxic. Many of these toxic compounds adhere to the diesel particles, which are very small and can penetrate deeply into the lungs. Diesel engine particulate matter has been identified as a human carcinogen. Mobile sources such as trucks, buses, and automobiles are some of the primary sources of diesel emissions. Studies show that diesel particulate matter concentrations are much higher near heavily traveled highways and intersections. The cancer risk from exposure to diesel exhaust is much higher than the risk associated with any other toxic air pollutant routinely measured in the region. Diesel exhaust contains both pulmonary irritants and hazardous compounds that can affect sensitive receptors such as young children, senior citizens, or those susceptible to chronic respiratory disease such as asthma, bronchitis, and emphysema. In 2005, the CARB approved a regulatory measure to reduce emissions of toxic and criteria pollutants by limiting the idling of new heavy -duty diesel vehicles, which altered five sections of Title 13 of the California Code of Regulations. The changes relevant to the proposed project are in Section 2485, Airborne Toxic Control Measure to Limit Diesel- Fueled Commercial Motor Vehicle Idling, which limit idling of a vehicle's primary diesel engine for greater than five minutes in any location (with some exceptions) or operation of a diesel - fueled auxiliary power system within 100 feet of residential areas. For this project diesel trucks would be used to transport demolition debris, and construction materials and diesel- powered construction equipment would be operated on site. Combustion emissions include suspended fine particulates (PM -2.5), and when these emissions are generated by diesel - powered equipment, they are referred to as diesel particulate matter (DPM), which contain substances that are known carcinogens. DPM is classified by the BAAQMD as a TAC and the BAAQMD CEQA Guidelines include quantitative thresholds to determine the significance of the project's construction- related emissions, both on a project - specific and cumulative basis. These thresholds are described below. In 2010, the BAAQMD adopted updated CEQA significance thresholds, including health risk exposure guidelines. These guidelines were based upon information detailed in the BAAQMD Thresholds Options and Justification Report (2009). On March 5, 202, the Alameda County Superior Court issued a judgment finding that that the Air District had failed to comply with CEQA in adopting those thresholds. The Court did not rule on the technical merits of the thresholds. The Town of Los Gatos has decided that use of the suspended thresholds as CEQA thresholds of significance is justified for those projects on which the Town is the Lead Agency. The recommended thresholds of significance for DPM emissions impacts are shown iii Table HR -1 for construction activity emissions on/around the project site. St Mary's Parish New Junior High School Building Project- Health Risk Screening Table HR -1 Risks and Hazards Construction - Related Significance Thresholds Pollutant i i Risks and Hazards — Increased cancer risk of >10.0 in a million TACs & PM2,5 Increased non - cancer risk of >1.0 Hazard Index (Chronic or Acute) (Individual Project) Ambient PM2,5 increase: >0.3 g /m3 annual average Increased cancer risk of >100 in a million (from all local sources) Increased non - cancer risk of >1.0 Hazard Index (from all local Risks and Hazards — sources) (Chronic or Acute) Cum & PM2,5 Ambient PM2.5 increase: >0.8 µg /m3 annual average (from all local (Cum ulative — Source or ( sources) Receptor) Zone of Influence: 1,000 -foot radius from property line of source or receptor Screening Level Construction- related Health Risk Analysis Combustion emissions from construction equipment would be generated during project construction and could expose adjacent sensitive receptors to DPM and other TACs. DPM exhaust emissions for on -site project construction from off -road heavy equipment were calculated using the CALEEMOD computer model. These activities are anticipated by CalEEMod to require approximately 180 days of construction. The BAAQMD has developed screening tables, the most recent of which are dated May 2011, for air toxics evaluation during construction to determine if a proposed project is sufficiently limited and setbacks are adequate to ensure that impacts to sensitive receptors from exposure to carcinogenic DPM emissions during project construction are less than significant. The closest adjacent home to the project construction was selected for evaluation to determine possible risk for these residents. The location of this home is shown in Figure 1. The BAAQMD's Recommended Methods for Screening and Modeling Local Risks and Hazards (May, 2011) were used to complete this screening -level health risk assessment, The BAAQMD recommends a two - tiered approach for screening -level health risk assessments: a screening -level dispersion model is initially applied to project emissions using generally over- predictive assumptions and if the predicted health risk is not within acceptable levels, then a more sophisticated dispersion modeling is necessary. St Mary's Parish New Junior High School Building Project - Health Risk Screening i ,� lmaacry oaic. i r { S - ir r� a r t �r �VB I 99{F� a t A screening -level individual cancer analysis was conducted to determine the maximum PM -2.5 concentration from diesel exhaust. This concentration was combined with the DPM exposure unit risk factor to calculate the inhalation cancer risk from project - related construction activities at the closest sensitive receptor. The EPA AERSCREEN air dispersion model was used to evaluate concentrations of DPM and PM -2.5 from diesel exhaust. The AERSCREEN model was developed to provide an easy to use method of obtaining pollutant concentration estimates and is a single source Gaussian plume model which provides a maximum one -hour ground -level concentration. The model output for this analysis is included in the appendix of this report. The predicted maximum one -hour DPM concentration is 2.237 µg /m3. The hourly to annual scaling factor is 0.1. AERSCREEN output thus indicates that project construction will produce a maximum annual DPM concentration of 0.2237 µg /m3. This is less than the individual project PM -2.5 significance threshold of 0.3 µg /m3. The excess individual cancer risk factor for DPM exposure is approximately 300 in a million per 1 µg /m3 of lifetime exposure. More recent research has determined that young children are substantially more sensitive to DPM exposure risk. If exposure occurs. in the first several years of life, an age sensitivity factor (ASF) of 10 should be applied. For toddlers though mid - teens, the ASF is 3. The DPM exposure risk from construction exhaust thus depends upon the age of the receptor population. However, even with the application of ASFs, the exposure risk to off - site residences is below BAAQMD thresholds seen as follows: Age Group Excess Cancer Risk* Infants 9.59 in a million Children 2.88 in a million Adults 0.96 in a million *DPM (µg /m) * ASF * 300 x 10-6 x 70 years The maximum individual cancer risk would be below the 10 in a million significance threshold. BAAQMD guidelines require a determination of cumulative emissions. Therefore, in addition to project construction, possible local stationary or vehicular source emissions must be added to this concentration to determine the cumulative total. Specifically, the BAAQMD requires that existing stationary and mobile emissions sources within 1,000 feet of the project area also be considered. Any potential cumulative health risk would, therefore, derive from project activities plus any existing identified risk sources within the project vicinity. The BAAQMD has developed a Google Earth application that maps the locations of all stationary sources in the region that the District permits. For each source the application lists the name of the source and the conservative screening level cancer risk and PM -2.5 concentration values. St Mary's Parish New Junior High School Building Project - Health Risk Screening The proposed project would locate new construction within 1,000 feet of several emergency backup generators located at the City of Los Gatos Public Works facility at 41 Miles Avenue. Based on the BAAQMD's database for existing permitted sources, the following screening -level estimates from existing permitted sources within 1,000 feet of the project site were compiled: Risks and Hazards for Maximally Exposed Receptor from Existing Permitted Stationary Sources Excess Chronic Acute Site # Facility Name Street City Distance Cancer Hazard Hazard PM2.5 Address Risk in a (µg /m ) Million Index Index G8309 Town of Los 41 Miles Los 875 ft 0.0803* 0.0001 * .0006 na Gatos Avenue Gatos 15607 Town of Los 41 Miles Los 911 ft 0.2472* 0.0001* .0006 0.00142 Gatos Avenue Gatos Total— Stationary Sources 0.3275 0.0002 0.0012 0.00142 *generator adjusted for distance per BAAQMD guidelines The district has also developed screening tables for roadways within 1,000 feet of a project based on annual average daily traffic (ADT). Only roadways with more than an ADT of 10,000 are to be included in any evaluation. There are no roadways with an ADT of more than 10,000 vehicles per day within 1,000 feet of the most impacted residence. The following chart summarizes the different cumulative area contributors (stationary source and project construction): *based upon the ratio of spectated organic gases to DPM in diesel exhaust relative to peak 1 -hour concentrations All combined cumulative impacts (stationary source and construction activities) will be well below adopted Los Gatos thresholds of significance. No upgraded impact analysis or mitigation measures are required based upon the results of the conservative (over- predictive) screening analysis. St Mary's Parish New Junior High School Building Project - Health Risk Screening 5 PM -2.5 Chronic Acute* Type Source Risk (x 10 "6) Concentration Hazard Hazard µg /m Stationary Emergency Generators 0.33 0.001 0.0002 0.0012 Source Mobile Source SR 17 Freeway 1.88 0.070 <0.03 <0.03 Individual Project (worst -case) 9.59 0.224 0.0447 0.3800 Max C�mulayiye.:. x,1:8 - ,;0 295„ ' < <0, 0749 �'0 4112: Town Significance Threshold 100 0.8 1 1 *based upon the ratio of spectated organic gases to DPM in diesel exhaust relative to peak 1 -hour concentrations All combined cumulative impacts (stationary source and construction activities) will be well below adopted Los Gatos thresholds of significance. No upgraded impact analysis or mitigation measures are required based upon the results of the conservative (over- predictive) screening analysis. St Mary's Parish New Junior High School Building Project - Health Risk Screening 5 AERSCREEN 11126 / AERMOD 1135 11/15/12 12:14:57 TITLE: St Marys ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ****************************** AREA PARAMETERS * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** ------------------------------------------------------------------ - - - - -- SOURCE EMISSION RATE: AREA EMISSION RATE: lb /(hr -m2) AREA HEIGHT: AREA SOURCE LONG SIDE: AREA SOURCE SHORT SIDE: INITIAL VERTICAL DIMENSION: RURAL OR URBAN: POPULATION: INITIAL PROBE DISTANCE 0.345E -02 g/s 0.465E -06 g /(s -m2) 4.57 meters 121.92 meters 60.96 meters 4.57 meters URBAN 30000 5000. meters 0.274E -01 lb /hr 0.369E -05 15.00 feet 400.00 feet 200.00 feet 15.00 feet 16404. feet ------------------------------------------------------------------------ *********************** BUILDING DOWNWASH PARAMETERS * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** ------------------------------------------------------------------ - - - - -- BUILDING DOWNWASH NOT USED FOR NON -POINT SOURCES ------------------------------------------------------------------------ * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** FLOW SECTOR ANALYSIS * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** 25 meter receptor spacing: 1. meters - 5000. meters ------------------------------------------------------------------ - - - - -- MAXIMUM IMPACT RECEPTOR Zo SURFACE 1 -HR CONC RADIAL DIST TEMPORAL SECTOR ROUGHNESS (ug /m3) (deg) (m) PERIOD ----------------------------------------------------- 1* 1.000 2.237 20 50.0 WIN * = worst case diagonal ------------------------------------------------------------------------ * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** MAKEMET METEOROLOGY PARAMETERS * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** ------------------------------------------------------------------ - - - - -- MIN /MAX TEMPERATURE: 249.8 / 310.9 (K) MINIMUM WIND SPEED: 2.5 m/s ANEMOMETER HEIGHT: 10.000 meters SURFACE CHARACTERISTICS INPUT: AERMET SEASONAL TABLES DOMINANT SURFACE PROFILE: Urban DOMINANT CLIMATE TYPE: Average Moisture DOMINANT SEASON: Winter ALBEDO: 0.35 BOWEN RATIO: 1.50 ROUGHNESS LENGTH: 1.000 (meters) METEOROLOGY CONDITIONS USED TO PREDICT OVERALL MAXIMUM IMPACT ------------------------------------------------------- - - - - -- YR MO DY JDY HR 10 01 01 1 01 HO U* W* DT /DZ ZICNV ZIMCH M -0 LEN ZO BOWEN ALBEDO REF WS -37.34 0.346 -9.000 0.020 -999. 468. 85.2 1.000 1.50 0.35 2.50 HT REF TA HT 10.0 249.8 2.0 METEOROLOGY CONDITIONS USED TO PREDICT AMBIENT BOUNDARY IMPACT -------------------------------------------------------- - - - - -- YR MO DY JDY HR 10 01 01 1 01 HO U* W* DT /DZ ZICNV ZIMCH M -0 LEN ZO BOWEN ALBEDO REF WS - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 37.34 0.346 -9.000 0.020 -999. 468. 85.2 1.000 1.50 0.35 2.50 HT REF TA HT 10.0 249.8 2.0 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** AERSCREEN AUTOMATED DISTANCES * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** OVERALL MAXIMUM CONCENTRATIONS BY DISTANCE ------------------------------------------------------------------ - - - - -- I J MAXIMUM DIST 1 -HR CONC (m) (ug /m3) 1.00 1.702 25.00 2.014 50.00 2.237 75.00 1.978 100.00 1.240 125.00 0.8583 150.00 0.6377 175.00 0.4983 200.00 0.4039 225.00 0.3367 250.00 0.2864 275.00 0.2480 300.00 0.2176 325.00 0.1931 350.00 0.1731 375.00 0.1564 400.00. 0.1423 425.00 0.1302 450.00 0.1199 475.00 0.1108 500.00 0.1029 525.00 0.9585E -01 550.00 0.8963E -01 575.00 0.8407E -01 600.00 0.7908E -01 I J MAXIMUM DIST 1 -HR CONC (m) (ug /m3) - - - - -- --------------- 2525.00 0.1056E -01 2550.00 0.1041E -01 2575.00 0.1027E -01 2600.00 0.1014E -01 2625.00 0.1000E -01 2650.00 0.9873E -02 2675.00 0.9746E -02 2700.00 0.9621E -02 2725.00 0.9500E -02 2750.00 0.9380E -02 2775.00 0.9264E -02 2800.00 0.9150E -02 2825.00 0.9038E -02 2850.00 0.8929E -02 2875.00 0.8822E -02 2900.00 0.8717E -02 2925.00 0.8614E -02 2950.00 0.8514E -02 2975.00 0.8415E -02 3000.00 0.8318E -02 3025.00 0.8224E -02 3050.00 0.8131E -02 3074.99 0.8040E -02 3100.00 0.7950E -02 3125.00 0.7863E -02 I J 625.00 0.7459E -01 3150.00 0.7777E -02 650.00 0.7052E -01 3174.99 0.7692E -02 675.00 0.6682E -01 3199.99 0.7609E -02 700.00 0.6345E -01 3225.00 0.7528E -02 725.00 0.6036E -01 3250.00 0.744.8E -02 750.00 0.5752E -01 3275.00 0.7370E -02 775.00 0.5490E -01 3300.00 0.7293E -02 800.00 0.5249E -01 3325.00 0.7218E -02 825.00 0.5025E -01 3350.00 0.7143E -02 850.00 0.4818E -01 3375.00 0.7071E -02 875.00 0.4624E -01 3400.00 0.6999E -02 900.00 0.4444E -01 3425.00 0.6929E -02 925.00 0.4276E -01 3450.00 0.6859E -02 950.00 0.4118E -01 3475.00 0.6792E -02 975.00 0.3971E -01 3500.00 0.6725E -02 1000.00 0.3832E -01 3525.00 0.6659E -02 1025.00 0.3701E -01 3550.00 0.6595E -02 1050.00 0.3578E -01 3575.00 0.6531E -02 1075.00 0.3462E -01 3600.00 0.6469E -02 1100.00 0.3352E -01 3625.00 0.6407E -02 1125.00 0.3248E -01 3650.00 0.6347E -02 1150.00 0.3152E -01 3675.00 0.6287E -02 1175.00 0.3059E -01 3700.00 0.6229E -02 1200.00 0.2970E -01 3725.00 0.6171E -02 1225.00 0.2885E -01 3750.00 0.6115E -02 1250.00 0.2805E -01 3775.00 0.6059E -02 1275.00 0.2728E -01 3800.00 0.6004E -02 1300.00 0.2655E -01 3825.00 0.5950E -02 1325.00 0.2585E -01 3849.99 0.5897E -02 1350.00 0.2519E -01 3875.00 0.5845E -02 1375.00 0.2455E -01 3900.00 0.5793E -02 1400.00 0.2394E -01 3925.00 0.5742E -02 1425.00 0.2336E -01 3950.00 0.5692E -02 1450.00 0.2280E -01 3975.00 0.5643E -02 1475.00 0.2226E -01 4000.00 0.5595E -02 1500.00 0.2175E -01 4025.00 0.5547E -02 1525.00 0.2125E -01 4050.00 0.5500E -02 1550.00 0.2077E -01 4075.00 0.5453E -02 1575.00 0.2032E -01 4100.00 0.5408E -02 1600.00 0.1988E -01 4125.00 0.5363E -02 1625.00 0.1945E -01 4150.00 0.5318E -02 1650.00 0.1904E -01 4175.00 0.5274E -02 1675.00 0.1865E -01 4200.00 0.5231E -02 1700.00 0.1827E -01 4225.00 0.5189E -02 1725.00 0.1790E -01 4250.00 0.5147E -02 1750.00 0.1755E -01 4275.00 0.5105E -02 1775.00 0.1720E -01 4300.00 0.5065E -02 1800.00 0.1687E -01 4325.00 0.5024E -02 1824.99 0.1655E -01 4350.00 0.4985E -02 1850.00 0.1.624E -01 4375.00 0.4945E -02 1875.00 0.1594E -01 4400.00 0.4907E -02 1900.00 0.1565E -01 4425.00 0.4869E -02 1925.00 0.1537E -01 4450.00 0.4831E -02 1950.00 0.1510E -01 4475.00 0.4794E -02 t 1975.00 0.1483E -01 4500.00 0.4758E -02 2000.00 0.1458E -01 4525.00 0.4721E -02 2025.00 0.1433E -01 4550.00 0.4686E -02 2050.00 0.1409E -01 4575.00 0.4651E -02 2075.00 0.1385E -01 4600.00 0.4616E -02 2100.00 0.1362E -01 4625.00 0.4582E -02 2125.00 0.1340E -01 4650.00 0.4548E -02 2150.00 0.1319E -01 4675.00 0.4514E -02 2175.00 0.1298E -01 4700.00 0.4481E -02 2200.00 0.1277E -01 4725.00 0.4449E -02 2224.99 0.1257E -01 4750.00 0.4417E -02 2250.00 0.1238E -01 4775.00 0.4355E -02 2275.00 0.1219E -01 4800.00 0.4354E -02 2300.00 0.1201E -01 4825.00 0.4323E -02 2325.00 0.1183E -01 4850.00 0.4292E -02 2350.00 0.1166E -01 4875.00 0.4262E -02 2375.00 0.1149E -01 4900.00 0.4232E -02 2400.00 0.1132E -01 4924.99 0.4203E -02 2425.00 0.1116E -01 4950.00 0.4173E -02 2449.99 0.1101E -01 4975.00 0.4145E -02 2475.00 0.1085E -01 5000.00 0.4116E -02 2500.00 0.1070E -01 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ********************** AERSCREEN MAXIMUM IMPACT SUMMARY * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** ------------------------------------------------------------------ - - - - -- 3 -hour, 8 -hour, and 24 -hour scaled concentrations are equal to the 1 -hour concentration as referenced in SCREENING PROCEDURES FOR ESTIMATING THE,AIR QUALITY IMPACT OF STATIONARY SOURCES, REVISED (Section 4.5.4) Report number EPA- 454/R -92 -019 http:// www. epa. gov /scram001 /guidance_permit.htm under Screening Guidance MAXIMUM SCALED SCALED SCALED SCALED 1 -HOUR 3- HOUR 8 -HOUR 24 -HOUR ANNUAL CALCULATION CONC CONC CONC CONC CONC PROCEDURE (ug /m3) (ug /m3) (ug /m3) (ug /m3) (ug /m3) --------- - - - - -- ---- - - - - -- ---- - - - - -- ---- - - - - -- ---- - - - - -- - - - -- FLAT TERRAIN 2.306 2.306 2.306 2.306 N/A DISTANCE FROM SOURCE 66.00 meters IMPACT AT THE AMBIENT BOUNDARY 1.702 1.702 1.702 1.702 N/A DISTANCE FROM SOURCE 1.00 meters This Page Intentionally Left Blanlc INITIAL STUDY - 219 BEAN AVENUE ATTACHMENT 4 ST. MARY'S PARISH & SCHOOL 219 BEAN AVENUE Los GATOS REVIEW OF PROJECT SUBMITTALS FOR COMPLIANCE WITH STORMWATER REQUIREMENTS EISENBERG, OLIVIERI & ASSOCIATES FEBRUARY 6, 2013 his Page Intentionally Left Blank TO: Maziar Bozorginia, Town of Los Gatos FROM: Jill Bicknell, P.E. CC: Trang Tu- Nguyen, Town of Los Gatos DATE: February 6, 2013 MEMORANDUM SUBJECT: St. Mary's Parish and School, 219 Bean Avenue, Los Gatos Second Review of Project Submittals for Compliance with Stormwater Requirements Project Description The project consists of construction of a new approximately 14,000 square -foot (ft2) 2 -story school building and a new 2,900 ft2 rectory building, and modification of an existing school building with an approximately 1,200 ft2 addition on the St. Mary's Parish and School campus. The project will also include demolition of an existing building, construction of a new covered eating area, and associated utilities, sidewalks and concrete flatwork. The total site area is 4.18 acres, and the area of land disturbance is 0.77 acres. The site is located within the Los Gatos Creek watershed. We conducted an initial review of this project for C.3 compliance and prepared a memorandum to the Town dated June 28, 2012 with our findings and recommendations. A revised set of plans and forms were submitted to us on January 15, 2013, and on January 24, 2013, we received authorization from the Town to conduct a second C.3 review. The findings of that review are presented in this memorandum. Updated information is underlined. We reviewed the following submittals with regard to this project for the second review: • St. Mary's Parish and School, Planned Development Zoning Application, PD -11 -006, dated 1/11/13: o A1.0 — Title Sheet • A3.0 — Conceptual Campus Plan • C1.0 — Preliminary Grading and Utility Plan (North) • CIA — Preliminary Grading and Utility Plan (South) • C1.2 — Preliminary Grading and Utility Plan (West) • C2.0 — Preliminary Stormwater Management Plan • C3.0 — Preliminary New & Replaced Impervious Areas • C4.0 — Site Plan (East) • C4.1 — Site Plan (West) • L.1 —Landscape Plan • Completed C.3 Data Form, revised 1/3/13 1 EOA, Inc. • 1 1 1 W. Evelyn Ave. • Sunnyvale, CA 94086 • Tel: (408) 720 -8811 • Fax: (408) 720 -8812 • Infiltration /Harvesting and Use Feasibility Screening Worksheet, dated 1/3/13, revised 2/5/13 • Rainwater Harvesting and Use Feasibility Worksheet, dated 2/5/13 • Town of Los Gatos Public Works Comments -Staff Technical Review, dated 12/19/12 • Kier & Wright Response to Public Works Comments, dated 1/3/13 • Cornerstone Earth Group, Geotechnical Investigation Report, March 22, 2012, page 5 and Boring Number EB -1 We reviewed the project submittals for compliance with the stormwater requirements in the Town of Los Gatos' NPDES Permit' (also known as the Municipal Regional Permit, or MRP) and consistency with related ordinances2. Our findings are presented below: 1. Applicability of NPDES Permit Provision C.3. Requirements a. Stormwater Treatment Requirements According to the C.3 Data Form and Plan Sheets C2.0, C3.0, and C4.0, the project proposes to replace 22,060 ft2 of existing impervious surface, and create 2,650 ft2 of new impervious surface, for a total of 24,710 ft2 of impervious surface created and replaced. Therefore, since the total amount of impervious surface to be created and /or replaced is greater than the C.3. threshold of 10,000 ft23, the C.3. treatment requirements do apply to this project. The low impact development (LID) treatment requirements apply to this project because it is a private C.3 Regulated Project that did not receive final discretionary approval before December 1, 2011.4 b. Hydromodification Control Requirements The project will create and replace less than 1 acre of impervious surface, so the hydromodification control requirements do not apply to this projects. 2. Proposed Stormwater Management Measures and Sizing Calculations a. The Preliminary Stormwater Management Plan (Sheet C2.0) indicates that a biotreatment "pond" located in the northerly portion of the site will provide treatment of runoff from the project. Runoff from some of the new and replaced impervious areas will not be able to be conveyed to the biotreatment pond, so runoff from an equivalent area of the existing, remaining portion of the site will be treated. The amount of impervious area that requires treatment is 24,710 ft2; the drainage area to the biotreatment pond is 29,700 ft2, which exceeds the required treatment area. b. Per the MRP, the infeasibility of infiltrating or harvesting and using the water quality design volume of runoff must be demonstrated before a biotreatment measure such as a California Regional Water Quality Control Board, San Francisco Bay Region, Municipal Regional Stormwater Permit, Order No. R2- 2009 -0074, adopted October 14, 2009, Provision C.3. 2 Town of Los Gatos Municipal Code, Chapter 12, Article II. Grading Permit, Sec. 12.20.050 Erosion control plan, Chapter 12, Article III, Design Standards, Sec. 12.30.080, Erosion and sediment control, and Chapter 22, Article III. Stormwater Pollution Control, Sec.22.30.035. New development/redevelopment. 3 California Regional Water Quality Control Board, San Francisco Bay Region, Municipal Regional Stormwater Permit, Order No. R2- 2009 -0074, as revised November 28, 2011, Provision C.3.b.ii.(3). 4 Ibid., Provision C.3.c.ii.(2) s Ibid., Provision C.3.g. St Marys C.3 Review Memo #2 2 -6 -13 2 biotreatment pond is allowed.6The applicant has completed the SCVURPPP Infiltration /Harvesting and Use Feasibility Screening Worksheet and the Rainwater Harvesting and Use Feasibility Worksheet for the project. The screening worksheet demonstrated the infeasibility of infiltration of the water quality design volume due to the presence of C and D soils on the site. The presence of C and D soils was confirmed by the Geotechnical Investigation Report. The screening worksheet also indicated that the project may have sufficient toilet flushing demand in the school building to harvest and use rainwater; however, this was deemed infeasible due to the lack of plumbing codes for rainwater harvesting systems. Thus the project is allowed to use biotreatment measures for stormwater treatment. c.The biotreatment pond was sized using the "4% rule" in which the surface area of the biotreatment pond is 4% of the contributing impervious area. This is a conservative flow - based method using the water quality design rainfall intensity specified in the MRP of 0.2 inches /hour and a design surface loading rate to the biotreatment area of 5 inches /hour.' The calculations shown on Sheet C2.0 apply the 4% sizing factor to the required treatment area of 24,710 ft2 to obtain a required surface area of 988 ft2. Applying the 4% factor to the actual drainage area to the biotreatment pond results in a -surface area of 1,188 ft2. The actual surface area of the biotreatment pond shown on Sheet C2.0 is 1,156 ft2. Given that this is a conservative sizing method that does not account for surface ponding, the proposed size of the biotreatment pond is adequate for treating the runoff from the drainage area. d. Sheet C2.0 provides a detail for the proposed biotreatment pond. The detail is consistent with current engineering practice for the design of bioretention facilities, the SCVURPPP C.3 Stormwater Handbook, and MRP requirements. The detail specifies the use of biotreatment soil mix in the SCVURPPP C.3 Stormwater Handbook, Appendix C (which is the same as that specified in Attachment L -Soil Specifications of the MRP). The detail shows that the underdrain is raised 6 inches above the bottom of the drain rock, which maximizes the amount of infiltration that will occur from the unlined pond. The maximum depth of the pond is shown to be 6 inches, which is consistent with SCVURPPP guidance. e. Stormwater will enter the biotreatment pond via sheet flow, piped flow from a catch basin at the end of a swale, and bubble -up structures connected to the roof drains. Cobbles are shown in the details for the biotreatment pond and the bubble -up structures to prevent erosion at the points at which concentrated surface runoff or roof runoff will enter the biotreatment pond. f. Sheet LA shows the proposed landscape pallette proposed for the biotreatment pond. The plants selected are consistent with the recommended plant list in the SCVURPPP C.3 Stormwater Handbook. The trees surrounding the biotreatment pond have been specified as "river birch or other tree listed for use in bioretention areas in Appendix D of the SCVURPPP C.3 Stormwater Handbook ". g. A maintenance plan for the biotreatment pond was provided as part of the Preliminary Stormwater Management Plan on Sheet C2.0. The maintenance tasks and frequencies are acceptable and consistent with SCVURPPP guidance. h. The C.3. Data Form indicates that the project will include three pollutant source control measures: 1) beneficial landscaping to minimize irrigation, runoff, pesticides and fertilizers; 2) application and maintenance of "No Dumping" labels on storm drain inlets; and 3) pavement sweeping and catch basin cleaning. This information is shown on the Preliminary 6 California Regional Water Quality Control Board, San Francisco Bay Region, Municipal Regional Stormwater Permit, Order No. R2- 2009 -0074, as revised November 28, 2011, Provision C.3.c.i.(2)(b)(ii). ' Ibid., Provisions C.3.c.i.(2)(b)(vi) and C.3.d.i.(2)(c). St Marys C.3 Review Memo #2 2 -6 -13 3 Stormwater Management Plan (Sheet C2.0). Sheet LA shows that water conserving plants will be used in the replaced landscaping on the site and in the biotreatment pond. I. The C.3 Data Form also indicates that the project will include the following site design measures: 1) minimum land disturbance; 2) minimized impervious surfaces; 3) minimum impact street design: 4) roof downspouts drain to landscaping; and 5) microdetention in landscaping. With the exception of the "minimum impact street design ", these elements are incorporated into the plans. j. The plans call for pervious paving around some of the existing trees, but the paving is not constructed with a drain rock section that will store and infiltrate the water quality design volume so these areas are considered impervious in the Stormwater Management Plan. 3. Consistency of SWPPP with Local Ordinances a. Since the disturbed area during construction is less than 1 acre, the applicant is not required to obtain coverage under the State Construction General Permits. b. An Erosion Control Plan was not provided, due to the preliminary stage of the project, and therefore was not reviewed for consistency with the Town's stormwater pollution control and erosion and sediment control requirements. The project Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) was not provided for review. 4. Conclusions a. The stormwater treatment measures specified for this project will treat the water quality design storm runoff as required by the Town's NPDES Permit Provision C.3 requirements, and are designed consistent with the permit and the SCVURPPP C.3 Stormwater Handbook. b. The site design and source control measures identified in the C.3 Data Form are acceptable for meeting the C.3 requirements. 5. Recommendations a. The Town can approve the Stormwater Management Plan for this project. b. In finalizing the landscape plan for the biotreatment pond, it is recommended that the landscape architect ensure that the characteristics of the selected plants and trees are similar to those of the plants and trees listed for use in bioretention areas in Appendix D of the SCVURPPP C.3 Stormwater Handbook9. c. Maintenance of the biotreatment pond and source control measures will be the responsibility of the property owner. The Town should require a maintenance agreement that establishes the property owner's responsibility and contains the maintenance plan submitted by the applicant. s NPDES General Permit for Storm Water Discharges Associated with Construction Activity, Water Quality Order 2009 - 0009 -DWQ, September 2009 (effective July 1, 2010). 9 Appendix D of the SCVURPPP C.3 Stormwater Handbook has been prepared as guidance to municipalities and development project applicants on the selection of appropriate plant materials for installation in stormwater treatment measures, and the plants listed in Table D -1 are recommended but not required for compliance with Provision C.3. St Marys C,3 Review Memo #2 2 -6 -13 4 INITIAL STUDY - 219 BEAN AVENUE ATTACHMENT 5 NOISE ASSESSMENT STUDY FOR ST. MARY'S SCHOOL BEAN AVENUE, LOS GATOS IC EDWARD L. PACK ASSOCIATES, INC. FEBRUARY 7, 2013 This Page Intentionally Left blank r4 01K47111 � TOR WIM e Q 1975 HAMILTON AVENUE Acouslical Consultants TEL: 408-371-1195 SUITE 26 FAX: 408-371-1196 SAN JOSE, CA 95125 www.packassociates.com NOISE ASSESSMENT STUDY FOR ST. MARY'S SCHOOL BEAN AVENUE, LOS GATOS Prepared for Geier & Geier Consultinz Inc. Prepared by Jeffrey K. Pack I February 7, 20.1I 3 Project No. 44-050 MEMBER: ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA NATIONAL COUNCIL OF ACOUSTICAL CONSULTANTS TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Executive Summary ...................................... ............................... 1 II. Background Information on Acoustics ................................ ............................... 3 III. Noise Standards, Goals & Policies A. Town of Los Gatos Noise Element of the General Plan ...... ............................... 7 B. Town of Los Gatos Noise Ordinance ................................... ..............................7 C. California Environmental Quality Act ................. ............................... 8 IV. Site and School Description ............................ ............................... 9 V. Noise Environments and Impacts ..................... ............................... 11 A. Noise Element of the General Plan Evaluation ........ .............................13 B. Noise Ordinance Evaluation ............................ ............................... 15 C. Demolition/Construction Noise ........................ ............................... 17 VI. Analytical Methodologies A. Traffic Noise ........................................... ............................... 18 B. Playground / Playfield Noise Analysis ............... ............................... 20 VII. Mitigation Measures A. Playfield Noise ................................................................. ............................... 25 B Demolition/Construction Noise ........................ ............................... 26 C. Mechanical Equipment Noise ......................... ............................... 27 VIII. Conclusions ................................................................... ............................... 27 APPENDIX A References............................................................................ ............................... A -1 APPENDIX B 1. Noise Standards ........ ............................... ..................... ............................... B -1 2. Terminology ..................................................................... ............................... B -2 3. Instrumentation ................................................................. ............................... B -4 APPENDIX C Noise Measurement Data and Calculation Tables ................ ............................... C -1 -1= I. Executive Summ This report presents the results of a noise assessment study, in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act, for the application of a rezoning to combine two lots, construct new school buildings, modify existing buildings and increase enrollment and staff volumes. This study includes an analysis of traffic noise impacts to residences along Bean Avenue, Tait Avenue and West Main Street, and playground and playfield noise impacts to the Bean Avenue and Tait Avenue residences. The West Main Street residences are too far from the playgrounds and playfield to be a concern. The increased enrollment proposal (project) increases the school enrollment allowance from 265 students and 20 staff members (existing condition) to 315 students and 36 staff members (existing + project condition). This increase is a 19% increase in enrollment. School children ages range from Kindergarten (approx. 5 years old) to 8th grade (approx. 13 years old). An increase in school related traffic is expected that corresponds to the increase in enrollment. The following report includes background information on acoustics, noise standards applicable to the project, existing scenario and project - generated noise impacts to the neighbors, and mitigation measures for noise impacted receptor locations. Important Note: Throughout this report, the term existing refers to a past scenario when the school operated under it's permitted conditions. The existing + project scenario is actually the current operations of the school with the enrollment at near capacity. Thus, the terms "existing" and "permitted" may be used interchangeably, and the terms "existing + project" and "current" may also be used interchangeably. The results of this study reveal that the project adds 1 decibel or less to the existing noise environment at sensitive receptors in the vicinity of the project. One receptor location along Tait Avenue adjacent to the playfield that does not have a side yard fence experiences a 1 decibel increase over the limit of the Town of Los Gatos General Plan. Noise mitigation measures for this home are recommended. -2- In terms of the CEQA compliance checklist, the project indicates the following: a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? Significant unless mitigated b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels? No impact c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? Less Than Significant d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? Less Than Significant e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? No impact f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? No impact -3- II. Background Information on Acoustics Noise is defined as unwanted sound. Airborne sound is a rapid fluctuation of air pressure above and below atmospheric pressure. Sound levels are usually measured and expressed in decibels (dB) with 0 dB corresponding roughly to the threshold of hearing. Most of the sounds which we hear in our normal environment do not consist of a single frequency, but rather a broad range of frequencies. As humans do not have perfect hearing, enviromnental sound measuring instruments have an electrical filter built in so that the instrument's detector replicates human hearing. This filter is called the "A- weighting" network and filters out low and very high frequencies. All environmental noise is reported in terms of A- weighted decibels, notated as "dBA ". All sound levels used in this report are A- weighted unless otherwise noted. Table I, below, shows the typical human response and noise sources for A- weighted noise levels. Although the A- weighted noise level may adequately indicate the level of noise at any instant in time, .community noise levels vary continuously. Most environmental noise includes a mixture of noise from distant sources that create a relatively steady background noise from which no particular source is identifiable. To describe the time- varying character of enviromnental noise, the statistical noise descriptors, Li, Lro, Lso and L90 are commonly used. They are the A- weighted noise levels exceeded for 1 %, 10 %, 50% and 90 % of a stated time period. The continuous equivalent- energy level (Leq) is that level of a steady state noise which has the same sound energy as a tune- varying noise. It is often considered the average noise level and is used to calculate the Day - Night Levels (DNL) and the Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL) described below. M TABLE I The A- Weighted Decibel Scale, Human Response, and Common Noise Sources Noise Level, dBA Human Response Noise Source 120 -150+ Painfully Loud Sonic Boom (140 dBA) 100 -120 Physical Discomfort Motorcycle at 20 ft. (110 dBA) Nightclub Music (105 dBA) 70 -100 Annoying Diesel Pump at 100 ft. (95 dBA) Freight Train at 50 ft. (90 dBA) Food Blender (90 dBA) Jet Plane at 1000 ft. (85 dBA) Freeway at 50 ft. (80 dBA) Alarm Clock (80 dBA) 50 -70 Intrusive Average Traffic at 100 ft. (70 dBA) Pass. Car, 30 mph @ 25 ft. (65 dBA) Vacuum Cleaner (60 dBA) Suburban Background (55 dBA) 0 -50 Quiet Normal Conversation (50 dBA) Light Traffic at 100 ft. (45 dBA) Refrigerator (45 dBA) Desktop Computer (40 dBA) Whispering (35 dBA) Leaves Rustling (20 dBA) Threshold of Hearing (0 dBA) -5- In determining the daily level of environmental noise, it is important to account for the difference in response of people to daytime and nighttime noises. During the nighttime, exterior background noises are generally lower than the daytime levels. However, most household noise also decreases at night and exterior noise becomes very noticeable. Further, most people sleep at night and are very sensitive to noise intrusion. To account for human sensitivity to nighttime noise levels, the Day -Night Level (DNL) noise descriptor was developed. The DNL is also called the Ld,,. Either is acceptable, however, DNL is more popular worldwide. The DNL divides the 24 -hour day into the daytime period of 7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. and the nighttime period of 10:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m. The nighttime noise levels are penalized by 10 dB to account for the greater sensitivity to noise at night. The Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL) is another 24 -hour average which includes a 5 dB evening (7:00 p.m. - 10:00 p.m.) penalty and a 10 dB nighttime penalty. Both the DNL and the CNEL average the daytime, evening and nighttime noise levels over a 24 -hour period to attain a single digit noise exposure. The proper notations for the Day -Night Level and the Community Noise Equivalent Level are dB DNL and dB CNEL, respectively, as they can only be calculated using A- weighted decibels. It is, therefore, considered redundant to notate dB(A) DNL or dB(A) CNEL. The effects of noise on people can be listed in three general categories: subjective effects of annoyance, nuisance, dissatisfaction; interference with activities such as speech, sleep, learning, relaxing; physiological effects such as startling, hearing loss. The levels associated with environmental noise, in almost every case, produce effects only in the first two categories. Workers in industrial plants, airports, etc., can experience noise in the last category. Unfortunately, there is, as yet, no completely satisfactory way to measure the subjective effects of noise, or of the corresponding reactions of annoyance and dissatisfaction. This is primarily due to the wide variation in individual thresholds of annoyance and differing individual past experiences with noise. M An important way to determine a person's subjective reaction to a new noise is to compare it to the existing environment to which one has adapted, i.e., the "ambient ". In general, the more a new noise exceeds the previously existing ambient noise level, the less acceptable the new noise will be judged by the receivers. With regard to increases in A- weighted noise level, the Environmental Protection Agency has determined the following relationships that will be helpful in understanding this report. ❑ Except in carefully controlled laboratory experiments, a change of 1 dB cannot be perceived. ❑ Outside of the laboratory, a 3 dB change is considered a just- perceptible difference. ❑ A change in level of at least 5 dB is required before any noticeable change in community response would be expected. ❑ A 10 dB change is subjectively heard as approximately a doubling in loudness, and would almost certainly cause an adverse change in community response. The adding or subtracting of sound levels is not simply arithmetic. The sound levels, in decibels, must be converted to Bels, the anti -log's of which are then calculated. The manipulation is then performed (arithmetic addition or subtraction), the logarithm of the sum or difference is calculated. The final number is then multiplied by 10 to convert Bels to decibels. The formula for adding decibels is as follows: Sum = l Olog(10 sLI,I + 10 sLno) where, SL is the Sound Level in decibels. For example, 60 dB + 60 dB = 63 dB, and 60 dB + 50 dB = 60 dB. Two sound sources of the same level are barely noisier than just one of the sources by itself. When one source is 10 dB higher than the other, the less noisy source does not add to the noisier source. -7- III. Noise Standards, Goals & Policies A. Town of Los Gatos Noise Element of the General Plan The noise assessment results presented in the findings were evaluated against the Town of Los Gatos Noise Element of the General Plan standards, Ref. (a), which uses the Day -Night Level (DNL) 24 -hour noise descriptor to define acceptable noise exposures for various land -uses. The acceptable limit for residential use is 55 decibels (dB) DNL. The DNL is defined further in Appendix B. The Town's Noise Element (Policy NOI -3) states that these noise limits represent the "long range community aspirations" and acknowledges that such goals may not be attainable at this time. The acceptable limit for commercial use is 70 dBA L,q(24). The Leq(24) is the 24 -hour average Leq, which is not time - weighted like the DNL. Because the Leq(24) noise exposures in the vicinity of the school are currently below 60 dBA, the commercial uses adjacent to the school are not being analyzed in this study. B. Town of Los Gatos Noise Ordinance The Town of Los Gatos Noise Ordinance, Ref. (b), limits noise over the short - term to mitigate noise annoyance. The Noise Ordinance limits are based on local ambient baseline noise levels that are shown on maps published by the Town and provided within the Ordinance. Noise zones were created throughout the Town with varying ambient sound level based on three periods over the 24 -hour day. The Noise Ordinance maps are provided to simplify the ambient determination process, as ambient conditions can be difficult to quantify under given circumstances. However, when the ambient can be measured, the measured value is used to supersede the map value. The noise limit for residential areas is 6 dB above the ambient. In terms of the project proposal, the Noise Ordinance is applicable to school operations, i.e., child playing on the playground and playfield, mechanical equipment associated with the new or modified buildings and to construction noise. As the mechanical designs for the buildings have not been developed, an assessment of the mechanical equipment could not be performed at this time. C. California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) The project - generated noise exposures were evaluated against the guidelines of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). CEQA does not limit noise levels or noise exposures nor does it quantify noise exposure or noise level increases over the ambient to define noise impacts. CEQA evaluates a project as a significant noise impact if it "...causes a substantial increases in the ambient noise levels... ". The quantification of the threshold of significance is left up to the local jurisdiction. The Town of Los Gatos Noise Element does not provide thresholds of significance in the General Plan. Therefore, the following thresholds of significance, based on CEQA case law, shall be applied at the existing residential areas to the west and north of the site where there is a potential for noise impacts. Other residential areas in the vicinity of the school are too far away to be a concern. These thresholds are: (a) causing the DNL in existing residential areas to increase by 5 dB or more and remain below 55 dB DNL; (b) causing the DNL in existing residential areas to increase by 3 dB or more and, thereby, exceed 55 dB DNL; (c) causing the DNL in existing residential areas to increase by 1 dB or more if the current noise exposure equals or exceeds 55 dB DNL. If the project causes any of the above three criteria to occur, the project will be considered a significant noise impact to the areas where it occurs and mitigation measures will be required. -9- IV. Site and School Description St. Mary's School is located in the downtown area of the Town of Los Gatos, west of (behind) a row of commercial uses that front North Santa Cruz Avenue. The school is part of St. Mary's Catholic Church located at 219 Bean Avenue. The school site contains three main school buildings, a large T- shaped playground and a large turf playfreld. The playground extends from Bean Avenue to the center of the site. The playfield sits between two homes along Tait Avenue and extends from Tait Avenue to the terminus of Lyndon Avenue. Parking lots are located along Bean Avenue, at the terminus of Lyndon Avenue and as part of the large playground. Surrounding land -uses include single- family residential adjacent to the west and across Bean Avenue to the north. Commercial uses are across Victory Lane to the east and adjacent to the south. There is a mix of commercial and residential uses along West Main Street to the south of the school. The primary sources of noise in the vicinity are traffic on Bean Avenue, Tait Avenue and West Main Street, commercial traffic /activity along Victory Lane, play area noise associated with St. Mary's School, and residential noise (landscaping /gardening and construction) at the surrounding residences. The proposed project, as shown on the Conceptual Campus Plan, Ref. (c), includes a rezoning application to combine separate lots on the site, increase the total enrollment allowance from 265 students to 315 students, increase staff from 20 to 36, modify the existing elementary school building, construct a new junior high school building and modify the existing Conditional Use Permit. The main playground area will mostly remain the same with the exception of one portion along Victory Lane where an existing classroom building will be demolished and a new junior high building will be built farther to the south. A new covered lunch area will be constructed behind the small school - related building facing Bean Avenue. The playfreld will remain unchanged. The Kindergarten and 1" grade play area behind the elementary school building will be updated. 'IW i 'St i it f j t 3 t F �, ' 18 Ta } 7Qatt Ave y x � „I` �°f! d _ r(' � �r ry t ✓ t �aa�1I � ` .F �. � iL _ •�� � r -- �'`..� s... f 1 ' r_ t jr f t fl V, J +' t t y _ L 1 X17 �,,,,,.,, I I A (t+ �' i �6 �r , ,- � �Y lei l j t WOy,Fix ■d SI �� � � '' d j � S��' c� . + �� 4i ��� '� r4 � r?. SC.dJ rt tw ase S , ri 4 & ip r + 11 , , 1•Y 4 -11- V. Noise Environments and Impacts To determine the existing (permitted) and existing + project (current) noise environments at the most impacted residential property boundaries across Bean Avenue and at the homes adjacent to the playfield, continuous recordings of the sound levels were made at these two locations. Location 1 was at the curb of Bean Avenue, 16 ft. from the centerline of the road at the side of the home at 100 Wilder Avenue. Location 2 was at the south property line of the home at 30 Tait Avenue near the rear facade of the home. This measurement location was used to better segregate playfield noise from traffic noise and noise from a residential construction project that was occurring across Tait Avenue. The noise recordings were made for a total period of 24 consecutive hours and included measurements during the daytime and nighttime periods of the DNL index. The sound levels were recorded and analyzed using Larson -Davis Model 812 Precision Integrating Sound Level Meters. The meters yield, by direct readout, a series of descriptors of the sound levels versus time, which include the Li, Lro, L50, and 1,90, i.e., those levels that are exceeded 1 %, 10 %, 50 %, and 90 % of the time. The meters also yield the maximum and minimum levels, and the continuous equivalent- energy levels (Leq), which are used to calculate the DNL. The Leq is that level of a steady -state noise that has the same sound energy has a time - varying noise. It is often considered the "average" noise level. -12- The measurement locations are shown on Figure 2, below. FIGURE 2 Because the measured noise levels represent the existing + projects conditions, the determination of the effect of the project on the permitted condition must "reversed engineered ". The permitted conditions were calculated by subtracting the project traffic increases and playground /playfield noise increases due to the increased enrollment from the measured noise levels. However, because there is a substantial portion of the noise environments due to background vehicular traffic, the traffic noise exposures without the school in either existing or existing + project conditions must be calculated. Then, the existing and existing + project noise exposures can be calculated to determine the impacts of the project on the existing (permitted) conditions. - 13 - A. Noise Element of the General Plan Evaluation Table II, below, provides the breakdown of the noise exposures at the south property line, in the side yard and at the house side setback of the home at 100 Wilder Avenue due to the various sources of noise that impact the home. TABLE TI Noise Exposures at 100 Wilder Ave. (Bean Ave.), dB DNL Measured Noise Exposure at 16 ft. from Centerline of Bean Ave. = 59 dB DNL Line No. Condition Prop. Line Side Yard House Setback 2 °d Floor 1 Total Measured Level 56 52 53 2 Background Traffic 55 51 52 3 Existing Traffic 45 (24') 41 (27') 42 (32') 4 Project Traffic 46 (24') 42 (27') 43 (32') 5 Existing Recess 48 (300') 45 46 6 Project Recess 49 (300') 46 47 7 Existing Lunch na na na 8 Project Lunch 23 (170') 23 (170') 23 (170') Noise Exposure Totals Existing (Lines 2 +3 +5 +7) 56 52 53 Existing + Project (Lines 2 +4 +6 +8) 56 53 54 The data in Table II reveal that the project will add 1 decibel to the existing noise environment created by school traffic and school related activities. The overall noise exposure in the most impacted exterior area and at the most impacted unshielded building fagade of the home will remain within the 55 dB DNL limit of the Town of Los Gatos Noise Element. Impact: Less Than Significant -14- Table III, below, provides the breakdown of the noise exposures at the south property line /side yard, at the house side setback and at the front side of the home at 30 Tait Avenue due to the various sources of noise that impact the home. Note that the property line and side yard noise exposures are the same as there is no solid fencing along the property line to provide any level of noise reduction. TABLE III Noise Exposures at 30 Tait Ave., dB DNL Measured Noise Exposure at 100 ft, from Centerline of Tait Ave. = 57 dB DNL Line No. Condition Prop. Line /Side Yard House-Setback Front of House 1 Total Measured Level 57 57 Not measured 2 Background Traffic 52 52 56 3 Existing Traffic 42 (100') 42 (100') 48 (30') 4 Project Traffic 42 (100') 42 (100') 48 (30') 5 Existing Recess 52 (45') 52 (50') 49 (80') 6 Project Recess 53 (45') 53 (50') 50 (80') Noise Exposure Totals Existing (Lines 2 +3 +5) 55 55 57 Existing + Project (Lines 2 +4 +6) 56 56 57 The data in Table III reveal that the project will add 1 decibel to the existing noise environment created by school traffic and school related activities. The overall noise exposure in the most impacted exterior area and at the most impacted unshielded building fagade of the home will increase from being at the limit of the 55 dB DNL standard of the Town of Los Gatos Noise Element to 1 decibel in excess of the limit. Impact: Significant BF12 Table IV, below, provides the traffic noise analysis results for the most impacted home along West Main Street. Due to the distance from this home to the school, only school traffic is analyzed. As shown in Table IV, the project will add less than 1 dB to the overall noise levels at the most impacted homes along West Main Street. Impact: Less Than Significant B. Noise Ordinance Evaluation In addition to the analysis performed per the Town of Los Gatos General Plan, an analysis of school - related noise was performed for an evaluation against the standards of the Town of Los Gatos Noise Ordinance. The Noise Ordinance limit is the ambient + 6 dB_ The ambient noise conditions include school noise under the existing operating scenario as these operations are part of the normal noise environment. Therefore, this study analyzes the effect of the increase in enrollment and how that causes an increase in the noise levels compared to the noise levels under the existing condition. Note that the current enrollment is 301 students and the proposed enrollment is expected to be 315 students. Table V provides the analysis of noise ,generated on the playheld and the evaluation of playfield noise against the standards of the Town of Los Gatos Noise Ordinance at the residence at 30 Tait Avenue. This analysis represents a worst -case scenario. The Llo value (noisiest 6 minutes) generated by children playing was evaluated against the less noisy hourly average ambient noise level. TABLE IV Traffic Noise Analysis for West Main Street Scenario School Traffic Volume (ADT) Total Traffic Volume (ADT) A dB Existing 230 2858 Existing + Project 272 2900 +0.4 dB As shown in Table IV, the project will add less than 1 dB to the overall noise levels at the most impacted homes along West Main Street. Impact: Less Than Significant B. Noise Ordinance Evaluation In addition to the analysis performed per the Town of Los Gatos General Plan, an analysis of school - related noise was performed for an evaluation against the standards of the Town of Los Gatos Noise Ordinance. The Noise Ordinance limit is the ambient + 6 dB_ The ambient noise conditions include school noise under the existing operating scenario as these operations are part of the normal noise environment. Therefore, this study analyzes the effect of the increase in enrollment and how that causes an increase in the noise levels compared to the noise levels under the existing condition. Note that the current enrollment is 301 students and the proposed enrollment is expected to be 315 students. Table V provides the analysis of noise ,generated on the playheld and the evaluation of playfield noise against the standards of the Town of Los Gatos Noise Ordinance at the residence at 30 Tait Avenue. This analysis represents a worst -case scenario. The Llo value (noisiest 6 minutes) generated by children playing was evaluated against the less noisy hourly average ambient noise level. i C� yN b Cd N .r.l b Ri a H � N � � H bA N o a � t � c o a; N 'u z OR 0 0 m O H a q0 o N ti �o W z .. d b ID �+ O\ Kl' W H Cl a o 0 H bA � o rn rn Mo 00 y b 0 In z b N m N Q} IIR N a a o kn 09 06 �o U w � O � v W � C� 0� W bo bo N N N N O H O O N M O O O E ° °o ° a o .p N C� yN b Cd N .r.l b Ri a H -17- The noise levels generated by children playing on the playfield are the highest levels of noise produced by school operations and activities. Therefore, the noise levels generated by other sources, such as the playground and lunch area will have less of an impact to nearby residences. Likewise, the noise levels generated by the other sources will be in compliance with the standards of the Noise Ordinance. C. Demolition /Construction N Short -term noise annoyance may be created during demolition of the existing structures on the site and construction of the new buildings. Demolition and construction equipment are typically similar, with the exception of paving equipment. Thus, the noise levels generated by the two phases will be similar over the course of entire process. Demolition/construction equipment noise levels range from 68 to 100 dBA at a 50 ft. distance from the source, and has a potential to disturb residences across Bean Avenue and along Tait Avenue. The demolition of the building along Bean Avenue and the subsequent construction of the church related residence will be similar to typical single - family residential construction. The demolition of the existing classroom building and construction of the new junior high building is farther from residential areas. The nearest uses are the rear facades of the commercial buildings across Victory Lane. The rear facades of this building are mostly solid with some man -doors used for deliveries. Measures to keep noise annoyance to a minimum will be recommended and are described in Section VII of this report. Impact: Less Than Significant 16 VI. Analytical Methodologies A. Traffic Noise To determine the noise levels generated by the various sources associated with the school under both existing and existing + project conditions, segregation of the noise levels from the various sources from the total measured noise levels was performed.. The measured noise levels at Location 1 and Location 2, represent the noise environments for the existing + project scenario plus background traffic noise. We are assuming that the background traffic conditions for the existing and existing + project scenarios is the same. The first operation was to subtract school traffic from the measured noise levels. To accomplish this, traffic volume data provided in the St. Mary's School Expansion Traffic Study, Ref. (d), was used. Note that the traffic study provided intersection turning movement volumes for the existing + project, existing + project + approved and existing + project + approved + pending buildout scenarios. The traffic study also provided the total traffic volumes for the AM peals, PM peals (school) for the project scenario. A breakdown of the traffic volumes associated with each of the two drop -off /pick up locations was not provided. We are assuming, for the purposes of this study that half of the school related traffic volumes use the Bean Avenue drop- off /pick up and half use the Lyndon Avenue drop- off /pick up. The traffic study revealed that there are 239 trips during the AM hour and 159 trips during the PM hour under the existing scenario. The total number of trips is 398 vehicles. School traffic does not occur over the course of the entire 24 -hour day like normal street traffic. To calculate the Average Daily Traffic (which is used to correspond to the Day- Night Level noise exposure), we add the AM peak, the PM peak and an additional 15% factor to account for non -peak hour school traffic, i.e., teachers that stay late and visitors during the day. - 19- The ADT calculated for this study is 459 vehicles for the existing scenario. Assuming that half use each of the two drop -offs, the existing school traffic volume on Bean Avenue is 230 vehicles, the school traffic volume on Tait Avenue is 230 vehicles and the school traffic volume on West Main Street and Lyndon Avenue is 230 vehicles. For the existing + project scenario a similar methodology was used. The traffic study reported 284 trips during the AM hour and 189 trips during the PM hours. The total trips is 473 vehicles. The ADT was calculated to be 544 vehicles, with 272 vehicles using Bean Avenue, 272 vehicles using Tait Avenue and 272 vehicles using West Main Street and Lyndon Avenue.. Figure 3 of the traffic study provides the AM peak and PM peals intersection turning movements for the existing + project scenario. From these diagrams, the total traffic volume for the leg of roadway along the analyzed receptor location is calculated. The Existing + Project + Approved scenario traffic volumes shown on Figure 4 of the traffic study are the same as those from Figure 3 for Bean Avenue, Tait Avenue, and West Main Street. The Existing + Project + Approved + Pending scenario traffic volumes shown on Figure 5 of the traffic study are same as those from Figure 3 for Bean Avenue and Tait Avenue. The West Main Street traffic volumes will be slightly higher, resulting in less of an effect of school traffic on the normal traffic conditions along West Main Street. For Bean Avenue, the existing + project traffic volumes are 78 vehicles AM peal-, and 120 vehicles PM peak. The ADT is assumed to be 10 times the highest peal-, hour, or 1,200 vehicles. Subtracting the school traffic volume of 272 vehicles for the existing + project scenario from this total, the background traffic volume was calculated to be 928 vehicles. The 230 vehicles due to the existing scenario was added to the background to yield an existing traffic volume of 1,158 vehicles. The difference in noise levels between the 1,200 vehicle existing + project scenario and the 1,158 vehicle existing scenario was calculated using the formula: 101091o(Vl /V2)where V = traffic volume. , -20- The result is that the project adds 0.15 decibels to the overall noise environment generated by school traffic under the existing scenario. For Tait Avenue, the existing + project traffic volumes are 129 vehicles AM peak and 197 vehicles PM peak. The ADT is 1,970 vehicles. Subtracting the school traffic volume of 272 vehicles for the existing + project scenario from this total, the background traffic volume was calculated to be 1,698 vehicles. The 230 vehicles due to the existing scenario was added to the background to yield an existing traffic volume of 1,928 vehicles. The difference in noise levels between the 1,970 vehicle existing + project scenario and the 1,928 vehicle existing scenario was calculated to be 0.09 decibels. For West Main Street, the existing + project traffic volumes are 263 vehicles AM peak and 290 vehicles PM peak. The ADT is 2,900 vehicles. Subtracting the school traffic volume of 272 vehicles for the existing + project scenario from this total, the background traffic volume was calculated to be 2,628 vehicles. The 230 vehicles due to the existing scenario was added to the background to yield an existing traffic volume of 2,858 vehicles. The difference in noise levels between the 2,900 vehicle existing + project scenario and the 2,858 vehicle existing scenario was calculated to be 0.06 decibels. The results of the traffic noise analysis reveals that the project will add insignificant levels of noise to the existing school traffic generated and background noise levels. B. Playground / Playfield Noise Analyses The effect of noise from the playgrounds and playfield was determined by segregating playground and playfield noise from the total measured noise levels then reducing the current existing + project noise levels to account for the difference in enrollment (number of children playing) between the existing + project scenario and the existing scenario. Information of student enrollment, playground and playfield usage and school operations was provided by St. Mary's Church, Ref. (e). -21- The noise levels generated by children playing on the playfield were determined from the on -site noise level measurements. The total measured noise exposure at the edge of the field near the rear fagade of the home at 30 Tait Avenue was 57 dB DNL. However, the field sprinkler system ran in the late night hours causing a 1 decibel increase in the noise exposure. Thus, without the sprinkler system, the noise exposure was 56 dB DNL. Additional noise occurring in the 7:00 a.m. — 9:00 a.m. hours, likely due to field maintenance, was recorded, but did not significantly effect the overall noise levels. Computer modeling of the traffic noise levels on Tait Avenue, from the data provided in the traffic report, indicate that the traffic noise level at the measurement location was 52 dB DNL. The resultant noise exposure due to playfield activity was calculated to be 53 dB DNL. The charts on page 22 provide the 24 -hour noise measurements in 1 hour intervals. The first chart provides the total measured noise levels with the sprinkler and maintenance noise levels removed. The second chart provides the traffic noise levels at the measurement location. The yellow bars indicate the times when children have access to the playfield. The third chart provides the hourly average noise levels of children playing on the playfield, which is the difference between the total measured noise levels and the traffic noise levels. The existing playfield noise exposure was then calculated from the existing + project noise levels shown in the chart and described above. In terms of average noise levels, as the total enrollment reduces from 315 students to 265 students, the difference in noise emission between 315 student and 265 students, assuming that the majority of the children are concentrated in one area and are making the same types of noises, is 1 decibel. Therefore, the noise exposure from the children on the playfield under the existing scenario was calculated to be 52 dB DNL. By recombining the noise levels, the total overall noise exposure at the home at 30 Tait Avenue closest to the center of the playfield (45 ft.) was calculated to be 55 dB DNL. Note that the side of this home has no solid fencing. The existing fencing is chain - link. I-- I I I O 0) I O)c 41 C5 OIO C C� q q q q q C C� 0 0i0 ' 'C� rz: ( (0! � j 0 CF) I r �21 t I i i l l io j j � � 'MI I I i i L Ll 11 z I.I loo 1cl I cl LL I > 4 N z 0 p < I M2 2 IL . 2 22 1 1 i Im i pl� M I O h 2 p p m -1-INIMIt o . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . l0 1 co C cl) N I I N c .. . . . . ..... . .... ..... Cli,- co r-i 1*1� ID c co co 0 0 �T M M 0 0) oD o oR U U� C m co C CY) •Lo m L01.4 m CO � � ( (0, Lo' 6 6 . .0* C CY) N NIg c co IC J - -1�; I col. cl). ( m I In A 0 0 N f (o ( P o ' 'Clo - Oijg 1 - 0 oo 0 q q Lq c c� I IR 1� c cq 7 R R M N N I Iq I Iq o� r 'Z' -j 1 IJ N I I 0 i2! 212 o 2q i LLI o < i n.;' EL < < < < (L I IL CLIO < n < < < < 0 2 2 0 C, C o o 'Pio 2 0 0 ? ' '. ' 0 C 0 0 0 0 0 q o o o o C co L Lo IN --f-- — — — — — — - I 0 I I D It m - —co Z Z5 44& r'� q D 3 3 cl� q 1� Lq L Lq A — ! 5 So 20 R cl r q c �2 �; L Lo 0 0) N N M c cl) io r-!w IM ou o 1100 N N al'ol'o-N S co ( (f) L L. 1. c m a) ' 't I I rZ c6qji Ln 0 -ji cl) I I — w U U) Z A F — al lu A Y 0 0 0 In t tN j ju o o qjr N N co 0) 0 N u) c co o oR 0 0 ON ' 't 0 0f, 0 0 co r Z�3 WN a M . 1 14N M- u M j — —4 0 w w 2 m 2 : :<E : 2<gq(LjoLp- o :2 :2 12 2 2 < 2 2 222 : :2 2 2 -E ' '0� I oco O IR I 1p IR o: C: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ' 'op sp . < 2 < < < < << 0 L LL ( 0 N 2 I (p 0 0. ( 1p 1p 1 1p 1p 1 1p 1p 1 �2 - " . 0 0 1p ( 0 0 0 -23- The proposed covered seating area will be used for outdoor lunch. Noise from outdoor lunch activity under the existing scenario is negligible as the current outdoor lunch area is too far from the residences to include in the analysis. Thus, outdoor lunch activity is not applicable to the quantification of the existing (permitted) condition and is applied only to the existing + project (future) condition for inclusion into the overall project noise level impacts to the residences across Bean Avenue. To determine the impacts from the proposed lunch area, noise from children eating lunch was modeled using a noise level of 51 dBA at 3 ft. for each student in the lunch area. As the center of the lunch area is 170 ft. from the nearest residence, the lunch area can be viewed as a single source of noise with the center of the area as the point of noise emission. The full enrollment for grades 2 -8 (ages that will use the outdoor lunch area) will be 245. Half of this volume (122 students) will be at the tables at any given time (8 students per table) for approximately t/a hour. The remaining 122 students will fill the tables during the second %z hour of lunch.. One hundred. twenty-two students each generating a noise level of 51 dBA at 3 ft. produces a total sound level of 37 dBA at 170 ft. One hour of a constant 37 dBA results in a noise exposure of 23 dB DNL. Noise from playground activity was calculated from noise data acquired at the playground of St. Andrew's School in Saratoga, Ref. (f). These data were used as the St. Andrew's School enrollment and playground use scenario is similar to St. Mary's School. During recess, 132 children, grades 6 -8, were measured to generate an hourly average noise level of 70 dBA Lea at a distance of 55 ft. from the center of the play area. During the lunch hour, 264 children, grades 1 -8, were measure to generate an hourly average noise level of 74 dBA Lea at 50 ft. from the center of the play area. Applying these data to the St. Mary's site, 105 students (morning recess) generates a sound level of 69 dBA Lea at 55 ft. during the 10 minute period. -24- The next 20 minute period has 140 students who generate 71 dBA Leq at 55 ft. Over the 1 hour period from 10:00 — 11:00, the two recess periods generate an hourly average noise level of 54 dBA Leq(h) at a distance of 300 ft. to the nearest and most impacted residence at 100 Wilder Avenue (measurement Location 1). During the lunch hour, a volume of 245 students generate an average noise level of 73 dBA Leq at 55 ft. from the center of the play area. At 300 ft., the hourly average noise level is 59 dBA Leg(l,). Students also play on the playground during other times, such as after school. Noise level measurements of children playing on the St. Mary's playground after school indicated an average noise level of 52 dBA. To account for these,extraneous play time activities, we are including two hours of noise level at 52 dBA Leg(1l) during the 3:00 — 5:00 p.m. period. The noise exposure at the most impacted residence at 100 Wilder Avenue from playground activity was calculated to be 49 dB DNL under the existing + project scenario. The existing scenario student enrollment is 84% of the existing + project volume. The lower volume yields a 1 decibel reduction in noise, given all else equal. Therefore, the existing noise exposure at 100 Wilder Avenue from children playing on the playground was calculated to be 48 dB DNL. The playground noise exposures are provided on Lines 5 and 6 of Table Il. Although the project - generated short -term noise levels (dBA) generated by children playing on the playfield will be incompliance with the Noise Ordinance, the existing + project noise exposures (dB DNL) will cause a 1 dB increase at the residence at 30 Tait Avenue due to children playing on the turf playfneld. Thus, the total noise exposure at the residence will exceed the 55 dB DNL limit of the Town of Los Gatos Noise Element. Noise mitigation measures will be required. The recommended measures are described in Section Il, below. -25- VII. Mitigation Measures A. Playfield Noise To reduce excess noise from playfield activity, the following noise control measures will be required: ❑ Construct a 6 ft. high solid board fence along (on or adjacent to) the property line between the playfield and the home at 30 Tait Avenue. The barrier height is in reference to the nearest playfield ground elevation. Figure 3, below, provides the location of the recommended noise control barrier. FIGURE 3 e -26- The fence shall be constructed of minimum 1" thick (nom.) redwood boards nailed tight such that no gaps are visible. Cracks, gaps, knotholes are not permitted. No openings are permitted between the upper fencing components and the ground. The implementation of the above recommended measures will reduce exterior noise exposures to 55 dB DNL or lower at the residential use adjacent to the playfield. B. Demolition /Construction Noise Mitigation of the demolition/construction phase noise at the site can be accomplished by using quiet or "flew technology" equipment. The greatest potential for noise abatement of current equipment should be the quieting of exhaust noises by use of improved mufflers. It is recommended that all internal combustion engines used at the. project site be equipped with a type of muffler recommended by the vehicle manufacturer. In addition, all equipment should be in good mechanical condition so as to minimize noise created by faulty or poorly maintained engine, drive -train and other components. Demolition and construction noise can also be mitigated by the following: ❑' Schedule construction operations that comply with the limits of the Town of Los Gatos Noise Ordinance. ❑ Limit the use of equipment close to sensitive receptor properties. ❑ Utilizing temporary berms or noise barriers, such as lumber or other material stockpiles and the construction trailers or other non - noisy long -term structures. ❑ Place long -term stationary equipment as far away from the residential areas as possible. ❑ Keep mobile equipment (haul trucks, concrete trucks, etc.) off of local streets as much as possible. -27- As noise reduction benefit can also be achieved by appropriate selection of equipment utilized for various operations, subject to equipment availability and cost considerations, the following recommendations for minimizing impacts on the surrounding area are offered: Earth Removal: Use scrapers as much as possible for earth removal, rather than the noisier loaders and hauling trucks. ❑ Ground Preparation: Use a motor grader rather than a bulldozer for final grading. ❑ Building Construction: Power saws should be shielded or enclosed where practical to decrease noise emissions. Nail guns should be used where possible as they are less noisy than manual hammering. ❑ Generators and Compressors: Use generators and compressors that are housed in acoustical enclosures rather than weather enclosures or none at all. C. Mechanical Equipment Noise ❑ Outdoor mechanical equipment associated with the new buildings of the project shall comply with the standards of the Town of Los Gatos Noise Ordinance, VIII. Conclusions In conclusion, the increase in enrollment will yield overall noise increases by zero to 1 decibel, which in of themselves, are insignificant. However, the existing noise exposure at the home at 30 Tait Avenue is at the limit of the Town of Los Gatos Noise Element standards. Thus, any increase in the noise environment is considered a significant impact. All other receptor locations are not significantly impacted. Measures to reduce playfield noise to acceptable levels are provided in Section VII of this report. -28- The study findings for existing conditions are based on field measurements and other data and are correct to the best of our knowledge. Noise projections are based on information provided by the consulting traffic engineer and project sponsor. Significant deviations in the future school enrollment, site planning, future changes in school activity levels, noise regulations or other future changes beyond our control may produce long -range noise results different from our estimates. Sincerely, EDWARD L. PACK ASSOC., INC. Jeffrey K. Pack President APPENDIX A (a) Town of Los Gatos 2020 General Plan, Chapter 10, "Noise Element ", Adopted September 20, 2010 (b) Town of Los Gatos Municipal Code, Ordinance 1852, Chapter 11, Section 11.30.030, 1991 (c) Conceptual Campus Plan, St. Mary's Parish and School, by Steinberg Architects, June 1, 2012 (d) "St. Mary's School Expansion Traffic Study ", by TJKM Transportation Consultants, July 12, 2012 (e) Information on St. Mary's School Expansion Project Operations and Activities Provided by St. Mary's Church to Edward L. Pack Associates, Inc. via email from Jennifer Savage, Town of Los Gatos Planning Department, October 15, 2012 (f) "Noise Assessment Study for the St. Andrew's Parish and School Remodel, Saratoga Avenue, Saratoga ", by Edward L. Pack Associates, Inc., Project No. 33- 009-3, October 21, 2002 APPENDIX B Noise Standards, Terminology, Instrumentation, 1. Noise Standards A. Town of Los Gatos 2020 General Plan Noise Element Standards The Noise Element of the General Plan of the Town of Los Gatos, adopted September 20, 2010, specifies noise limits for various land uses. Land Use dB DNL dBA Leq(24) Residential 55 Commercial 70 Industrial 70 Open Space Intensive (developed park) 55 Passive (natural park) 50 Hospital 55 Educational 55 Interior noise exposures for single- family developments are specified to be the same as multi - family developments. This statement asserts coincidence with the standard of the State of California Code of Regulations, Title 24 noise limit of 45 dB DNL for all new housing. B -1 2. TerminolojZy A. Statistical Noise Levels Due to the fluctuating character of urban traffic noise, statistical procedures are needed to provide an adequate description of the environment. A series of statistical descriptors have been developed which represent the noise levels exceeded a given percentage of the time. These descriptors are obtained by direct readout of the Sound Level Meters and Noise Analyzers. Some of the statistical levels used to describe community noise are defined as follows: Li - A noise level exceeded for 1% of the time. LI0 - A noise level exceeded for 10% of the time, considered to be an "intrusive" level. L50 - The noise level exceeded 50% of the time representing an "average" sound level. L90 - The noise level exceeded 90 % of the time, designated as a "background" noise level. Lea - The continuous equivalent- energy level is that level of a steady - state noise having the same sound energy as a given time - varying noise. The Leq represents the decibel level of the time - averaged value of sound energy or sound pressure squared and is used to calculate the DNL and CNEL. M. B. Day-Night Level (DNL) Noise levels utilized in the standards are described in terms of the Day -Night Level (DNL). The DNL rating is determined by the cumulative noise exposures occurring over a 24 -hour day in terms of A- Weighted sound energy. The 24 -hour day is divided into two subperiods for the DNL index, i.e., the daytime period from 7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m., and the nighttime period from 10:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m. A 10 dB weighting factor is applied (added) to the noise levels occurring during the nighttime period to account for the greater sensitivity of people to noise during these hours. The DNL is calculated from the measured Leq in accordance with the following mathematical formula: Where: DNL = [(Ld +l0loglol5) & (L„ +10 +101oglo9)] - 101ogio24 Ld = Leq for the daytime (7:00 a.m, to 10:00 p.m.) L„ = Leq for the nighttime (10:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m.) 24- indicates the 24 -hour period & - denotes decibel addition. C. A- Weighted Sound Level The decibel measure of the sound level utilizing the "A" weighted network of a sound level meter is referred to as "dBA ". The "A" weighting is the accepted standard weighting system used when noise is measured and recorded for the purpose of determining total noise levels and conducting statistical analyses of the environment so that the output correlates well with the response of the human ear. 3. Instrumentation The on -site field measurement data were acquired by the use of one or more of the precision acoustical instruments shown below. The acoustical instrumentation provides a direct readout of the L exceedance statistical levels including the equivalent - energy level (Leg). Input to the meters was provided by a microphone extended to a height of 5 ft. above the ground. The meter conforms to ANSI S1.4 for Type 1 instruments. The "A" weighting network and the "Fast" response setting of the meter were used in conformance with the applicable ISO and IEC standards. All instrumentation was acoustically calibrated before and after field tests to assure accuracy. Bruel & Kjaer 2231 Precision Integrating Sound Level Meter Larson Davis LDL, 812 Precision Integrating Sound Level Meter Larson Davis 2900 Real Time Analyzer WE APPENDIX C Noise Measurement Data and Calculation Tables 1 co c I!! !3 l 00 CO I 7 ..._. .- ... —t"" I (O � O N W II � d; 10 d; O ji <F . � r Co. h O d' h M r 00 d' O W ifj i!') .�..tn 1 O'N. c�N(0 CO N m N m II - W wI- N Log WIN I to M W O m 0 00 W Ih I m N W OJ OTI a W 0.0. O N 00 0 M (O N (n w r W 0 t(') M W O �} "'d'�I�O(O' mNmM h h m , I � O I(O (0 i ti (n ` �C) W1 (n ([) 00 r ! 1)N d' r m N h1n�0m h I M NEB, (Vi` � 1f1fIflf OD r (O m co r O�}O (O (O (n M M r� r r, CO . It o r k � o 16 E Ll Ll 11 J 11 N -Z j iJ of 00 (��(�;(� OD N W 0614 (D 't M (O co 1(fl L 31 N'Lq (o (o , W ,.N (n Lo Lo W.. cto W N ml� War h!W � � O h �t (n (n Wjj�!(O l0{c- �1�ti� h (t77W 0 (VI J Jtth i(4 �J I 1 N J90�0 a) I LO i �Z Ii Fz� of Q- jJ a. 2212 i 12 22a_aQ :22 2 ¢�I 01 w ¢QQE000CLCLCL aa0 0 a000QQQQQQ I U O o 0 (P 9 0jj o9,mj6 0 0 4i� o O of9 o 0 0 Ml(P 0 ((7_(0.9 0 0 o O 00 m o 6 0 4_- 0 0 N 9�N.1p 0 00 9 0 0 I0) 00 I i I 1 0j`� ! co 3N r (n { f I I I I 1 �Z) II i ^ :D vn n ^.i, .W T ._ CO Z fO I r Q' W CO W W W 'tMWI W M h mit fl- co m (V 0) IN'O m W N CO 0 OIM O y0 O (0 CO mf h CO t r W M MiM hy0 m m d M N d W r (O (n M (p M d W -M 1- W O 00 MmIW jd<t ' OD M h 0W 0 h O (O h mM m d CW O N O *O h m�.p.^TO COILIi W I r (() _j i IN ZJ (o �• d' m 0 3 co co d'E(OO �� C1N h 0) W't i h m r,- h O O I�NIW M N N t0 f W l W I (n h h. (O M 'IT LO N m h (D M , r �) N h 0 M. M N W (n d' (n CO c} W m co (O N ! 1 Q J J O 0 tW. w._m�,..m EO r r 10Th Ir _•.I__ ttt I it u p i% IQI I� i� 0410 l .(O 'a�i a�ilZ oI J 3{ } i0. �Q' N; C\1 I O' �J (n M mCN W W M. W O m (n•O Nim O 0 W rIh W�OIIr Ib h M t- W. M h N W 0 W (O'WIh M Mih (n (O W'NI mid'! i i N [j iE ��� E 70 2 Q �IQ Iw, V-' i� ��Z OIR W ¢ { N. m (p I (� ��mIW I m WiWiW I 11 ( I WIW ImIWI� I W (O W d• d•�d• ! ' d• d• d• d'�!n.) I j i ia' l�,zj L` II _d• N _._ j __ i� H w IU 01 co o �'�12 2 �12 =� �1� :2!:E I �2r :2 2 ��� I �!!� IW z I� !w Iii3O !� Z) 1 F { Q I U -i W ¢ coo ¢�¢ Q ¢In_,� o olo c olo aiain(d 00 010 dadajn�a o O!o!0 0 0 o 0 4 0 0 Q oi¢I¢ 0)o o ¢I¢ oiiiiii0 ¢,¢ oio t J IU,W i,1 Q �iW I J �I IH O I` oI0 CO CY) 0 SIN ryr� Oi0 {N O!O �M 1� t O'OHOjO.O LO (O hjCO 0) 0 — 7 r N)O10 r!r'N O O M�d' O (n O (0 I This Page Intentionally Left Blank INITIAL STUDY - 219 BEAN AVENUE ATTACHMENT 6 ST. MARY'S SCHOOL EXPANSION TRAFFIC STUDY IN THE TOWN OF LOS GATOS I CONSULTANTS JULY 12, 2012 This Page Intentionally Left Blank TJKM Transportation Consultants 144 Vision That Moves Your Community Final Report St. Mary's School Expansion Traffic Study In The Town of Los Gatos July 12, 2012 www.tjl<m.com Prepared by: TJKM Transportation Consultants 3875 Hopyard Road Suite 200 Pleasanton, CA 94588 -8526 Tel: 925.463.061 1 Fax: 925.463.3690 J: \JURISDICTION \L \Los Gatos \021 -093 On -call Services \Task 029 - St. Mary's School Expansion Traffic Study \Report \R 0712I2.docx -rJKM Transportation Consultants Table of Contents Introduction and Summary ................................................................... ............................... Introduction.......................................................................................................................... ............................... I Summary................................................................................................................................ ............................... I Scope of the Traffic Study ..................................................................... ............................... 4 StudyIntersections .............................................................................................................. ..............................4 StudyScenarios ..................................................................................................................... ..............................4 Analysis Methodology ............................................................................. ..............................5 Level of Service Analysis Methodology ........................................................................... ..............................5 SignificantImpact Criteria .................................................................................................. ..............................5 Signalized and Unsignalized Intersections .................................................................. ..............................5 ExistingPlus Project Traffic Conditions ............................................... ..............................6 StreetNetwork .................................................................................................................... ..............................6 Estimated Project Trip Generation .................................................................................. ..............................6 Levelof Service Analysis ..................................................................................................... ..............................6 Student Drop- off/Pick -up Observations ......................................................................... ..............................9 CollisionAnalysis .............................................................................................................. ............................... 10 Existing plus Project plus Approved (Background plus Project) Conditions ................ I I Levelof Service Analysis .................................................................................................. ............................... I I Background plus Project plus Pending (Cumulative) Conditions ... ............................... 14 Levelof Service Analysis .................................................................................................... .............................14 Conclusions ........................................................................................... ............................... 17 StudyParticipants and References ..................................................... ............................... 18 TJKMPersonnel ................................................................................................................. ............................... 18 Others.................................................................................................................................... .............................18 References............................................................................................................................ .............................18 TJ I<M Transportation Consultants List of Appendices Appendix A — Level of Service Analysis Methodology Appendix B — Traffic Data Appendix C — Level of Service Worksheets: Existing plus Approved Conditions Appendix D — Level of Service Worksheets: Existing plus Approved plus Project Conditions Appendix E — Level of Service Worksheets: Existing + Approved + Project + Pending Conditions List of Figures FigureI: Vicinity Map .............................................................................................................. ..............................2 Figure2: Aerial View of Project Site .................................................................................... ..............................3 Figure 3: Existing plus Project Turn Movement Volumes ............................................... ..............................8 Figure 4: Existing plus Approved plus Project Turning Movement Volumes ......... ............................... 13 Figure 5: Background plus Project plus Pending Turning Movement Volumes ..... ............................... 16 List of Tables Table I: Estimated Project Trip Generation of Expansion of Student Enrollment .... ..............................6 Table II: Intersection LOS — Existing plus Project Conditions ...................................... ..............................7 Table III: Intersection LOS — Existing plus Approved (Background) plus Project Conditions.......... 12 Table IV: Intersection LOS — Background + Project + Pending Conditions .......... ............................... 14 TJ KM Transportation Consultants Introduction and Summary Introduction This report presents the results of TJKM's traffic analysis for the St. Mary's Parish and School Planned Development application at 219 Bean Avenue. The application includes merging two lots into one lot, construction of a new junior high school building and modifications to the existing grammar school building, and increases of parking, staff and student quotas. It is estimated that the increase in traffic would primarily result from the proposed increase in the student quota. Based on the information provided by the Town staff, TJKM understands that the St. Mary's School is currently operating with an enrollment of 315 students. However, the conditional use permit for the school specifies allowed enrollment for only up to 265 students. Thus, the school exceeds its operational permit by 50 students. As part of this traffic study, TJKM analyzed study intersections that include additional traffic from the increased enrollment at St. Mary's School. Figure I illustrates the project location and its vicinity. Figure 2 shows an aerial photo of the school site. Summary The St. Mary's School expansion of student enrollment by 50 students is estimated to have added 45 trips (25 inbound and 20 outbound trips) during the a.m. peak hour and 30 trips (14 inbound and 16 outbound) during the school p.m. peak hour (between 2:30 p.m. and 3:30 p.m.) to the Los Gatos street system. All study intersections operate at acceptable levels of service of LOS D or better during school peak hours under all the study scenarios except for the intersection of Los Gatos Saratoga Road /Massol Avenue, a one -way stop controlled intersection. At this intersection, the northbound left -turn movement on Massol Avenue is estimated to have levels of service F during both peak hours for all of the study scenarios. The intersection of Los Gatos Saratoga Road and Massol Avenue is controlled with a one -way stop for the northbound left -turn movement on Massol Avenue. The right turn movement from Massol Avenue is uncontrolled and is provided with a dedicated lane on Los Gatos Saratoga Road to turn into. The left -turn volumes from Massol Avenue are 26 and 28 vehicles per hour during existing a.m. and school p.m. peak hours, respectively. The low volume of northbound left- turning traffic does not meet any of the signal warrant criteria. Based on field observations and accident analysis, the signalization of this intersection does not appear to be necessary. TJKM recommends that Town staff monitor the intersection operation if a new traffic signal or other improvements may need to be considered in the future. The peak -hour 95th percentile queue for this movement is approximately 75 feet (three vehicle lengths) during both peak hours, which is consistent with the field observations. Levels of service were also estimated by removing the trips generated with the additional 50 students from the existing traffic counts. The results of level of service remain the same with and without the additional project trips from the student enrollment expansion. Based on collision reports obtained from the Town staff for the last two years (April I, 2009 — March 31, 2011), there were three reported collisions at the intersection of Los Gatos Saratoga Road /N. Santa Cruz Avenue, one reported collision at Los Gatos Saratoga /Massol Avenue, and two reported collisions at the intersection of Main Street /N. Santa Cruz Avenue. The estimated collision rates for all of the study intersections are below the statewide average collision rates. The proposed project is expected to have little or no impact on the collision rate (or safety) at the study intersections or on the study road segments. Final Report — St Mary's School Expansion Traffic jrc Study Page I July 12, 2012 6 Town of Los Gatos - St. Mary's School Expansion Traffic Study Figure Vicinity Map 1 021 -093 T29 - 6/1/12 - VG � COs cgro q�q s 2 sq 6gC'S" Rq �� RgTOG Ni°hOCSONe gNgG� q cql O��CCq�cc ,� Ro 3, °J Q NFOYRp, °r� y J• ,�. p��� M l� FRAM Q � ;FAN •� � � O�Ns oelm "'giNsr 3 Project Site GPTAC� P LYNDON AVE. 4 o � C9 g o° 0 CHURCH 2 J E. MAIN ST. SL a �\ QPev. CO W 0, ¢ r w `v v �O Oy �9 AN 5 c - VILLA AVE. 0 4, qND Z F` AVE. p ROG� K F = W W a N U� NORTH Not to Scale LEGEND 0 Study Intersection 021 -093 T29 - 6/1/12 - VG ! # g L. V r ,$ it �tR�•f 4s 0. d'Y �r y��r # �4. -�`� ki � ` c � j i -� -. }ate {' fs�vit�riS# = t �r t t 3 m •t vim" , L t t ' f e� +v1,�: ©..raj �. r i W t y 2a `: f`a - t �)rV r o, `r�`� -,,may 4�J.7� �; `� ��jjL+.� � 4_ _ ,� $ �aQ�✓ ° ' Aq- i , � 8 If lj qq e p { '°'tx �t 4�Q ✓ 2,� rY ; .�`i�, S 4� G %r 1 # is � � ,'�`"�C� 1 1, ! . s ^� r a Pmt r0 art li .ri + gt'iF L c�y f V r, 1. 0 it � u . N o" ilz, fw m yf it x,.�4 ss re. -tom ;Y IN- Fm y � TJ KM Transportation Consultants Scope of the Traffic Study Study Intersections The following five intersections were selected by the Town staff for analysis: 1. Los Gatos Saratoga Road (State Route 9) /Massol Avenue — One -Way Stop 2. Los Gatos Saratoga Road (State Route 9) /N. Santa Cruz Avenue — Signal 3. Main Street /Lyndon Avenue — One -Way Stop 4. Main Street/N. Santa Cruz Avenue — Signal 5. Bean Avenue /Tait Avenue — All -Way Stop Study Scenarios The school is already operating at the proposed 315 student enrollment, including the proposed expansion of student enrollment. The following three scenarios were addressed in this study: I . Existing plus Project Conditions Current (Year 2012) traffic volumes and roadway conditions that already include additional traffic from the expanded student enrollment. 2. Existing plus Project plus Approved Conditions (Background plus Project) — Adding traffic from the approved projects within the Town of Los Gatos to the "Existing plus Project Condition ". 3. Existing plus Project plus Approved plus Pending Conditions (Cumulative Conditions) — Adding traffic from future pending projects within the Town of Los Gatos to the "Existing plus Project plus Approved Condition. Final Report — St Mary's School Expansion Traffic Study Page 4 July 12, 2012 TJKM Transportation - Consultants Analysis Methodology Level of Service Analysis Methodology The operating conditions at all of the study intersections were evaluated using the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) Operations Method contained in TRAFFIX software. The default saturation flow rates were adjusted to comply with the Congestion Management Program (CMP) methodology adopted by the Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority (VTA). Peak hour intersection conditions are reported as average delay in seconds per vehicle with corresponding levels of service (LOS). A level of service rating is a qualitative description of intersection operations, which is reported using an A through F letter rating system to describe travel delay and congestion. Level of Service A indicates free flow conditions with little or no delay and LOS F indicates jammed conditions with excessive delays and long back -ups. The methodology is described in detail in Appendix A. Significant Impact Criteria Signalized and Unsignalized Intersections The Town's level of service standard is LOS D. Intersections that fall below LOS D are considered as impacted and should be considered for mitigation. A proposed project is considered to have a significant impact if it causes the levels of service for the study intersections to drop more than one level if it is at LOS A, B, or C, and drop any further if it is at LOS D or worse. Final Report — St Mary's School Expansion Traffic Study Page 5 July 12, 2012 TJKM Transportation Consultants Existing Plus Project Traffic Conditions This section describes the current (Year 2012) traffic volumes and roadway conditions that already include additional traffic from the expanded student enrollment. Street Network Main Street is a collector street with a posted speed limit of 25 miles per hour. Based on the weel<day average daily traffic (ADT) data collected during May 2012 for Main Street (east of Lyndon Avenue), the ADT is approximately 3,330 vehicles per day. Currently, the project site access along Main Street is via Lyndon Avenue, a cul -de -sac street. Secondary access to the school site is along Bean .Avenue, which provides a passenger drop -off and pickup zone along the curb fronting the project site. The existing walkway facilities along Main Street, Lyndon Avenue and Bean Avenue are adequate based on the field checks conducted' by TJKM staff. Estimated Project Trip Generation The trip generation was estimated based on rates provided in Trip Generation, 8th Edition, published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE), Trip Generation Manual, May 2008. Table I shows the project trip generation estimates for the net increase in student enrollment. It is estimated that the St. Mary's School expansion of student enrollment by 50 students added approximately 45 trips (25 inbound and 20 outbound trips) during the a.m, peal< hour and 30 trips (14 inbound and 16 outbound) during the school p.m. peak hour to the Los Gatos street system. Table I: Estimated Project Trip Generation of Expansion of Student Enrollment Private School (K -8) (ITE Land Use Code 5d Size (Students) A.M. Peak Hour School P.M. Peak Hour Trip Rate In:Out Ratio In Out Total Trip Rate 16:Out Ratio In Out Total Current Enrollment 315 0.90 55:45 156 128 284 0,60 47:53 89 100 189 Permitted Enrollment 265 0.90 55:45 131 107 239 0.60 47:53 75 84 159 Net Increase 50 25 20 45 14T 16 30 Notes: Source - ITE Trip Generation Manual, 81h Edition, 2008 Level of Service Analysis Peak -hour turning movement counts at the study intersections were conducted on a typical weekday during the first half of May 2012, when St. Mary's School was in regular session. Figure 3 illustrates the existing lane configuration and the peak hour turning movement volumes at the study intersections. The raw traffic counts are provided in Appendix B. Table II summarizes the results of the intersection analysis under Existing plus Project Conditions. The detailed LOS calculations (TRAFFIX Output) are contained in Appendix C. Under Existing plus Project Conditions, all study intersections operate at an acceptable service level (LOS D or better) except for the intersection Los Gatos Saratoga Road /Massol Avenue. It should be noted that the northbound left turn movement of Massol Avenue at Los Gatos Saratoga Road operates at LOS F during both the a.m. and the school p.m. peak hours. Final Report — St Mary's School Expansion Traffic Study Page 6 July 12, 2012 r TJKM Transportation Consultants The intersection of Los Gatos Saratoga Road and Massol Avenue is controlled with a one -way stop for the northbound left -turn movement on Massol Avenue. The northbound right turn movement from Massol Avenue is uncontrolled and is provided with a dedicated travel lane on Los Gatos Saratoga Road to turn into. The left -turn volumes from Massol Avenue are 26 and 28 vehicles per hour during existing a.m. and school p.m. peak hours, respectively. The peals -hour 95th- percentile queue for this movement is approximately 75 feet (three vehicle lengths) during both peak hours, which is consistent with the field observations. The low volumes of the northbound left -turn movement do not meet any of the signal warrant criteria. Based on field observations and accident analysis, the signalization of this intersection does not appear to be necessary. Thus, TJKM recommends that the Town staff monitor the intersection operation to evaluate whether a new traffic signal or other improvements may need to be considered in the future. Table I1: Intersection LOS — Existing plus Project Conditions Note: Delay = Overall average intersection delay in seconds for Signalized and All -way Stop controlled intersections, or minor street (worst approach) delay for One -way Stop Control intersections; LOS = Level of Service; * - Left turn movement It should be noted that the results of the level -of- service calculations are the same with and without the additional trips from the proposed expansion of student enrollment. Final Report — St Mary's School Expansion Traffic Study Page 7 July 12, 2012 A.M. Peak Hour School P.M. Peak Hour ID Intersection Control Average Delay LOS Average Delay LOS (sec /veh) (sec /veh) I Los Gatos Saratoga Road One -way > 120.0 F* > 120.0 F* (State Route 9) /Massol Avenue Stop 2 Los Gatos Saratoga Road Signal 39.8 D 37.1 D (State Route 9) /N. Santa Cruz Avenue 3 Main Street/Lyndon Avenue O$eoway 11.1 B 10.2 B 4 Main Street/N. Santa Cruz Signal 25.8 C 30.0 C 5 Bean Avenue /Tait Avenue All-way 7.4 A 7.6 A Note: Delay = Overall average intersection delay in seconds for Signalized and All -way Stop controlled intersections, or minor street (worst approach) delay for One -way Stop Control intersections; LOS = Level of Service; * - Left turn movement It should be noted that the results of the level -of- service calculations are the same with and without the additional trips from the proposed expansion of student enrollment. Final Report — St Mary's School Expansion Traffic Study Page 7 July 12, 2012 Town of Los Gatos - St. Mary's School Expansion Traffic Study Figure Existing plus Project Turn MovementVolumes 3 Intersection #I Intersection #2 Intersection #3 Intersection #4 Los Gatos Saratoga Rd. /Massol Ave. N. Santa Cruz Ave./ E. Main St. /Lyndon Ave. Santa Cruz Ave. /E. Main St. Los Gatos Saratoga Rd. 0 NvNNoN. ��' w X k107(127) t- 1,322(708) 150 (183) 126 (189) d 883(501) rnm ' rn F67 88) 570 (983 r 181 (242) T N� Co <k_89 128) 67 141) M � i; 263 (336) � 92 (18 467 (717 70 (124) G � v N 17 (55) N 77 (160) —y( T � MM N N N Intersection #5 Tait Ave. /Bean Ave. N r 9 (24) 1 ��t` 10 (18) a Ail 7 (13) a q 6y�y 12 (17) 28(27)–+ 21 (38) N N "q�ST 3 PF eCt Site s LYNDON AVE. 4 E. AVE. LEGEND _ • Existing Study Intersection N O R T H Traffic Signal Not to scale e Stop Sign NN XX AM Peak Hour Volumes (XX) PM Peak Hour Volumes 021 -093 T29 - 7/11/12 - VG '�fliltt�li r ti;,l���t�� t TJ I<M Transportation Consultants It should be noted that during the peak hour conditions, student drop -offs at the zone on Lyndon Avenue are assisted by the school staff to help the parents. During the school p.m. peal, period between 2:30 p.m, and 3:30 p.m., the parent vehicles begin to arrive at the pick -up zone (which is same as the drop -off zone) and also stack along vacant curb parking spaces. It was noted that parent arrivals were spread over a longer time and the stacking conditions were relatively shorter compared to the a.m. peak drop -off activity. Based on the a.m. and the school p.m. peak hour observations by TJKM staff, no particular queuing issues were observed at the drop- off /pickup zones. Collision Analysis Based on the 2009 Collision Data on California State Highways publication, the average statewide collision rate for a four - legged suburban signalized intersection is 0.55 collisions per million vehicles (PMV). Similarly, the state -wide average collision rate at multi - legged unsignalized intersection is 0.30 collisions PMV. TJKM obtained collision reports from the Town staff for the last two years (April I, 2009 — March 31, 201 1) at all of the study intersections. • One collision was reported at the intersection Los Gatos Saratoga Road /Massol Avenue. Based on the existing peak hour turning movement counts, the number of vehicles entering this intersection is estimated to be 8.04 million vehicles during the aforementioned two -year time period. The collision rate for an intersection is defined as the number of collisions per million vehicles entering the intersection. The collision rate at the intersection of Los Gatos Saratoga Road /Massol Avenue is calculated to be 0'.12 (= 1/8.04) collisions per million vehicles. Thus, the estimated collision rate at this intersection is well below the state -wide average rate of 0.30 collisions PMV. • The number of vehicles entering the intersection of Los Gatos Saratoga Road /N. Santa Cruz Avenue is 12.44 million vehicles. Collision reports for this intersection obtained from the Town staff for the last two years indicate that there were three collisions. The collision rate at this intersection is estimated at 0.24 (= 3/12.44) collisions PMV, which is well below the state -wide average rate of 0.55 collisions PMV. • The number of vehicles entering the intersection of Main Street /N. Santa Cruz Avenue is 5.35 million vehicles. Collision reports for this intersection indicate that there were two collisions. The collision rate at this intersection is 0.38 (= 2/5.35) collisions PMV. Thus, the collision rate at this intersection is well below the state -wide average rate of 0.55 collisions PMV. • No collisions were reported for the last two years (April I, 2009 — March 31, 201 1) at the intersections of Main Street/Lyndon Avenue and Tait Avenue /Bean Avenue. It should be noted that given its relatively small trip generation numbers, the proposed project is expected to have little or no impact on the collision rate (or safety) at the study intersections. Final Report — St Mary's School Expansion Traffic Study Page 10 July 12, 2012 .« TJ KM Transportation Consultants Existing plus Project plus Approved (Background plus Project) Conditions This Scenario is similar to Existing plus Project Conditions, but with the addition of traffic from approved developments. Approved projects consist of developments that are under construction, are built but not fully occupied, or are not built but have final development approval from the Town. Based on recent communication with the Town staff, the following approved projects are expected to generate some traffic through the study intersections: I. 15940 Blossom Hill Road (residential) 2. 15881 Linda Avenue (residential) 3. 55 Los Gatos Saratoga (retail /office) 4. 15720 Winchester Boulevard (office development replaces a single - family home) 5. 14881 National Avenue (medical office development replaces a single - family home) 6. 15400 Los Gatos Boulevard (office /retail) 7. 16005 Los Gatos Boulevard (mixed -use) 8. 950 University Avenue (self- storage) 9. 15928 Union Avenue (residential) 10. Samaritan Way (medical office) 11. 55 Placer Oaks (single - family housing) 12. 16213 Los Gatos Boulevard (residential replaces auto dealership) 13. 800 Blossom Hill Road (senior adult residential) 14. 930 University Avenue (soccer complex) IS. 640 Blossom Hill Road (Chipotle Fast Food Restaurant) 16. 135 Riviera Drive (residential apartments expansion) 17. 14251 Winchester Boulevard (medical office building) These projects are expected to add a total of 855 vehicular trips during the a.m. peak hour and 766 vehicular trips during the school p.m. peak hour on the Town of Los Gatos street network. Level of Service Analysis Figure 4 illustrates the Existing plus Approved plus Project turning movement volumes and Table III summarizes the results of the intersection analysis. The detailed LOS calculations are contained in Appendix D. Final Report — St. Mary's School Expansion Traffic Study Page I I July 12, 2012 TJ I<M Transportation Consultants Table III: Intersection LOS — Existing plus Approved (Background) plus Project Conditions Note: Delay = Overall average intersection delay in seconds for Signalized and All -way Stop controlled intersections, or minor street (worst approach) delay for One -way Stop Control intersections; LOS = Level of Service; * - Left turn movement All study intersections are expected to continue to operate at acceptable conditions (LOS D or better) under the Existing plus Approved (Background) Project Conditions except for the intersection of Los Gatos Saratoga Road /Massol Avenue. The northbound left -turn at this intersection is expected to continue to operate at LOS F during both the peak hours. The northbound left -turn (NBLT) volumes from Massol Avenue to Los Gatos Saratoga Road are expected to remain approximately the same as existing volumes, 26 and 28 vehicles per hour during a.m. and school p.m. peal( hours, respectively. The low volumes of the left -turn movement do not meet any of the signal warrant criteria. TJKM does not expect significant changes in traffic conditions at this NBLT movement in the near future. However, Town staff should monitor the intersection operation to evaluate whether any improvements are required in future years. Final Report — St. Mary's School Expansion Traffic Study Page 12 July 12, 2012 Y 1 f r A.M. Peak Hour School P.M. Peak Hour ID Intersection Control Average Delay LOS Average Delay LOS (sec /veh) (sec /veh) I Los Gatos Saratoga Road One -way > 120.0 F* > 120.0 F* (State Route 9) /Massol Avenue Stop 2 Los Gatos Saratoga Road Signal. 40.0 D 37.2 D (State Route 9) /N. Santa Cruz Avenue 3 Main Street/Lyndon Avenue OS Stop 11.2 B 10.2 B 4 Main Street/N. Santa Cruz Signal 25.9 C 30.2 C 5 Bean Avenue /Tait Avenue I All-way Stop 7.4 A 7.6 A Note: Delay = Overall average intersection delay in seconds for Signalized and All -way Stop controlled intersections, or minor street (worst approach) delay for One -way Stop Control intersections; LOS = Level of Service; * - Left turn movement All study intersections are expected to continue to operate at acceptable conditions (LOS D or better) under the Existing plus Approved (Background) Project Conditions except for the intersection of Los Gatos Saratoga Road /Massol Avenue. The northbound left -turn at this intersection is expected to continue to operate at LOS F during both the peak hours. The northbound left -turn (NBLT) volumes from Massol Avenue to Los Gatos Saratoga Road are expected to remain approximately the same as existing volumes, 26 and 28 vehicles per hour during a.m. and school p.m. peal( hours, respectively. The low volumes of the left -turn movement do not meet any of the signal warrant criteria. TJKM does not expect significant changes in traffic conditions at this NBLT movement in the near future. However, Town staff should monitor the intersection operation to evaluate whether any improvements are required in future years. Final Report — St. Mary's School Expansion Traffic Study Page 12 July 12, 2012 Y 1 f r Town of Los Gatos - St. Mary's School Expansion Traffic Study Figure Existing plus Approved plus Project Turn Movement Volumes 4 Intersection #I Intersection #2 Intersection #3 Intersection #4 Los Gatos Saratoga Rd. /Massol Ave. N. Santa Cruz Ave./ Los Gatos Saratoga Rd. E. Main St. /Lyndon Ave. Santa Cruz Ave. /E. Main St. ��` r�' 7 i ^VN 12 (17) Y CO CD o t 1,336(719) NMv X149(178) °oo°� �co� `ovN k- 107(127) 126(189) MN� t- 889(512) Ne) —rn— F69 88) 181 (242) �i �89 (128) 82 157) 577 (999 35 (583 +� W _ �Jy r 267 —4 I 92 (1183 - 97 �s;l N m (338) 477 (726) (84) 71 125 ;: i 17 �j N 77 (160) vc� V j55) co c� v10 m M N N N Intersection #5 Tait Ave. /Bean Ave. mo .,M N 9(24) 10 (18) ��` r�' 7 i (13) 12 (17) Y 28 (27) 21 (38) °oo°� �L� LEGEND _ 0 Existing Study Intersection N O R T H Traffic Signal Not to Scale s Stop Sign '14 XX AM Peak Hour Volumes (XX) PM Peak HourVolumes 021 -093 T29 - 7/11/12 - VG TJ KM Transportation Consultants Background plus Project plus Pending (Cumulative) Conditions This Scenario evaluates future conditions with traffic from pending projects added to Background plus Project traffic. The pending projects are foreseeable developments that are likely to add traffic to the study intersections. According to Town staff, the following developments are pending projects: I. North Forty Specific Plan (mixed -use) 2. 15500 Los Gatos Boulevard (re- development assumptions for Moore Buick GMC) 3. 620 Blossom Hill Road (re- development assumptions for Bentley Silicon Valley) 4. Twin Oaks (single family residential) 5. 16213 Los Gatos Boulevard (residential replaces auto dealership) 6. 339 -341 Bella Vista (single family residential) 7. 15600 Los Gatos Boulevard (pharmacy and commercial development) 8. Hillbrook School Expansion Project (k -8 school) 9. Albright Way Development (office and residential) These pending projects are expected to contribute a total of 1,942 vehicular trips during the a.m. peak hour and 2,265 vehicular trips during the school p.m. peak hour on the Los Gatos street network. Level of Service Analysis Figure 5 summarizes the Background plus Project plus Pending peals hour turning movement volumes and Table IV summarizes the results of the LOS analysis. The detailed LOS calculations are contained in Appendix G. With the addition of the estimated pending project trips, all of the study intersections are expected to operate at the same LOS as Background plus Project Conditions during both the peak hours. Table IV: Intersection LOS — Background + Project + Pending Conditions Note: Delay = Overall average intersection delay in seconds for Signalized and All -way Stop controlled intersections, or minor street (worst approach) delay for One -way Stop Control intersections; LOS = Level of Service; * - Left turn movement Final Report — A Mary's School Expansion Traffic Study Page 14 July 12, 2012 A.M. Peak Hour School P.M. Peak Hour ID Intersection Control Average Delay LOS Average Delay LOS (sec /veh) (sec /veh) I Los Gatos Saratoga Road One -way > 120.0 F* > 120.0 F* (State Route 9) /Massol Avenue Stop 2 Los Gatos Saratoga Road Signal 41.4 D 38.2 D (State Route 9) /N. Santa Cruz Avenue 3 Main Street/Lyndon Avenue One Pay 11.3 B 10.4 B 4 Main Street/N. Santa Cruz Signal 25.7 C 30.5 C 5 I Bean Avenue /Tait Avenue All-way Stop 7.4 A 7.6 A Note: Delay = Overall average intersection delay in seconds for Signalized and All -way Stop controlled intersections, or minor street (worst approach) delay for One -way Stop Control intersections; LOS = Level of Service; * - Left turn movement Final Report — A Mary's School Expansion Traffic Study Page 14 July 12, 2012 TJKM Transportation Consultants All study intersections are expected to continue to operate at acceptable conditions (LOS D or better) under the Existing plus Approved (Background) Project Conditions except for the intersection of Los Gatos Saratoga Road /Massol Avenue. The northbound left -turn at this intersection is expected to continue to operate at LOS F during both the peak hours. The northbound left -turn (NBLT) volumes from Massol Avenue to Los Gatos Saratoga Road are expected to remain approximately the same as existing volumes, 26 and 28 vehicles per hour during a.m. and school p.m. peak hours, respectively. The low volumes of the left -turn movement do not meet any of the signal warrant criteria. TJKM does not expect significant changes in traffic conditions at this NBLT movement in the near future. However, Town staff should monitor the intersection operation to evaluate whether any improvements are required in future years. Final Report — St. Mary's School Expansion Traffic Study Page 15 July 12, 2012 Town of Los Gatos - St. Mary's School Expansion Traffic Study Figure Existing plus Approved + Project + Pending Turn MovementVolumesrj Intersection #1 Los Gatos Saratoga Rd. /Massol Ave. 126 (189)2) 606 (1,040 j� -*- 35 (58; Corn pgl N M N Intersection #S Tait Ave. /Bean Ave. Coo r t R 10 (18) t�' �j 7 (13) 12(17) s 28 (27) 4 21 (38) °cl°D L (D Lo LEGEND • Existing Study Intersection Traffic Signal z Stop Sign XX AM Peak Hour Volumes (XX) PM Peak HourVolumes 021 -093 T29 - 7/11/12 - VG Intersection #2 N. Santa Cruz Ave./ Los Gatos Saratoga Rd. NWCO LO �M I- (o 150(206) * 896 (532) m N 183 (248) 292(356)--A 73 (101) 488 (742) n 77 (160) - -W- A%i 14 97 (84) N N Intersection #3 E. Main St. /Lyndon Ave. Intersection #4 Santa Cruz Ave. /E. Main St. l: M(od Co (O ' °� v"M X107(127) N� 73 (101) 72 �340) �,_92 102x(179) -W- A%i 14 97 (84) 53 (34) 1 I 97 (128) 76 (128) (nm 17 (55) V m v STN I giNST 3 Project Site LYNDON AVE. 4 r O O O CHURCH T v E. MAIN ST. T. O ¢ 3 W /e 0�, PpG WT VILLA I' 9ND AVE. N O R T H Not to Scale TJKM Transportation Consultants Conclusions TJKM has reached the following conclusions regarding the traffic analysis of the expansion of student enrollment at St. Mary's School in the Town of Los Gatos: • The St. Mary's School expansion of student enrollment by 50 students is estimated to have added 45 trips (25 inbound and 20 outbound trips) during the a.m. peak hour and 30 trips (14 inbound and 16 outbound) during the school p.m. peak hour (between 2:30 p.m. and 3:30 p.m.) to the Los Gatos street system. • All study intersections operate at acceptable levels of service of LOS D or better during a.m. and school p.m. peak hours and under all the study scenarios except for the intersection of Los Gatos Saratoga Road /Massol Avenue, a one -way stop controlled intersection. At this intersection, the northbound left -turn movement on Massol Avenue is estimated to have levels of service F during both peak hours for all of the study scenarios. • The intersection of Los Gatos Saratoga Road and Massol Avenue is controlled with a one -way stop for the northbound left -turn movement on Massol Avenue. The right turn movement from Massol Avenue is uncontrolled and is provided with a dedicated lane on Los Gatos Saratoga Road to turn into. The northbound left -turn (NBLT) volumes from Massol Avenue to Los Gatos Saratoga Road are expected to remain approximately same as existing volumes, 26 and 28 vehicles per hour during a.m. and school p.m. peak hours, respectively. The low volumes of the northbound left -turn movement do not meet any of the signal warrant criteria. TJKM does not expect significant changes in traffic conditions at this NBLT movement in the near future. However, Town staff should monitor the intersection operation to evaluate whether any improvements are required in future years. • The pealc -hour 95th - percentile queue for this movement is approximately 75 feet (three vehicle lengths) during both peak hours, which is consistent with the field observations. • Levels of service were also estimated by removing the trips generated with the additional 50 students from the existing traffic counts. The results of level -of- service calculations remain same with and without the additional project trips from the student enrollment expansion. Based on collision reports obtained from the Town staff for the last two years (April I, 2009 — March 31, 2011), there were three reported collisions at the intersection of Los Gatos Saratoga Road /N. Santa Cruz Avenue, one reported collision at Los Gatos Saratoga /Massol Avenue and two reported collisions at the intersection of Main Street /N. Santa Cruz Avenue. The estimated collision rates for all of the study intersections are below the statewide average collision rates. The proposed project is expected to have little or no impact on the collision rate (or safety) at the study intersections or on the study road segments. Final Report — St Mary's School Expansion Traffic Study Page 17 July 12, 2012 TJ I<M Transportation Consultants Study Participants and References TJKM Personnel Rich Haygood, P.E., T.E. Vishnu Gandluru Dan Harrison Margie. Pfaff Others Jessy Pu, P.E. Maziar Bozorginia, P.E. References Project Manager Project Engineer Graphic Designer Word Processor Traffic Engineer, Town of Los Gatos Associate Civil Engineer, Town of Los Gatos • ITE Trip Generation Manual, 8th Edition, 2008 • SANDAG Trip Generation Manual, 2008 • Traffic Level of Service Analysis Guidelines: Congestion Management Program, Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority, 2003 Final Report — St Mary's School Expansion Traffic Study Page 18 July 12, 2012 TJKM Transportation Consultants t, DESCRIPTION OF SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION CAPACITY ANALYSIS Updated 2000 HCM METHOD Background The operations method of intersection capacity analysis found in Chapter 16, "Signalized Intersections," of the Highway Capacity Manual 2000, Transportation Research Board, was used for this study. This method is used in most analyses of existing conditions or of future situations in which traffic, geometric, and control parameters were well established by projections and trial designs. This method addresses the capacity and level of service of intersection approaches, and the level of service of the intersection as a whole. In this method, capacity and level of service are evaluated separately, and are not related to each other in a simple one -to -one fashion. Capacity is evaluated in terms of the ratio of demand flow rate to capacity (volume -to- capacity ratio), while level of service is evaluated on the basis of control delay per vehicle (sec /veh). The capacity of the intersection as a whole is not addressed by this method; the design and signalization of intersections focuses on the accommodation of the major movements and approaches comprising the intersection. Capacity is, therefore, only meaningful as applied to these major movements and approaches. Capacity analysis results in the computation of volume - to- capacity ratios for individual movements and a composite volume -to- capacity ratio for the sum of critical movements or lane groups within the intersection. The volume -to- capacity ratio is the actual or projected rate of flow on an approach or designated group of lanes during a peak 15- minute interval divided by the capacity of the approach or designated group of lanes. Level of Service Level of service is based on the control delay per vehicle for various movements within the intersection. While volume -to- capacity affects delay, there are other parameters that more strongly affect it, such as the quality of progression, length of green phases, cycle lengths, and others. Thus for any given volume -to- capacity ratio, a range of delay values my result, and vice - versa. See the table "Level of Service Criteria for Signalized Intersections" for the relationship between the level of service and stopped delay per vehicle. Because delay is a complex measure, its relationship to capacity is also complex. It is possible, for example, to have delays in the range of Level of Service F while the volume -to- capacity ratios is below 1.00, perhaps as slow as 0.75 -0.85. Very high delays can occur at such volume -to- capacity ratios when some combination of the following conditions exists: the cycle length is long; the lane group in question has a long red time; and /or the signal progression for the subject movement is poor. The reverse is also possible. A saturated approach or lane group with a volume -to- capacity equal to 1.00 may have low delays if the cycle length is short, and /or the signal progression is favorable for the subject movement. Acceptable delay levels do not automatically ensure that capacity is sufficient. The analysis must consider the results of the capacity analysis module and the level of service module to obtain a complete picture of existing or projected intersection operations. c:\ tjkm\ templates\appendices- pleasanton office\sign, method 2000.doc 07/17/02 Thus, the designation of Level of Service does not automatically imply that the intersection, approach, or lane group is overloaded, nor does a level of service in the A to E range automatically imply that there is unused capacity available. The procedures of this methodology require the analysis of both capacity and level of service conditions to fully evaluate the operation of a signalized intersection. Input Data The input data necessary to use this methodology are: • Lane geometries • Traffic volumes • Signal timing • Vehicle type distribution • Percent grade • Pedestrians • Peak hour factors • Parking activity • Arrival type per approach Reference: Highway Capacity Manual, Special Report No. 209, Transportation Research Board, 2000. e:\ tjkm\ templates\appendices- pleasanton office\sign. method 2000.doc 07/17/02 Table A -1: Level of Service Criteria for Signalized Intersections Level of Service Type of Flow Delay Maneuverability Control Delay/ Vehicle (s /veh) A Stable Very slight delay. Progression is very Turning movements are easily made, < 10.0 Flow favorable, with most vehicles arriving and nearly all drivers find freedom of during the green phase and not operation, stopping at all. B Stable Good progression and /or short cycle Vehicle platoons are formed. Many > 10 -20 Flow lengths, More vehicles stop than for drivers begin to feel somewhat LOS A, causing higher levels of restricted within groups of vehicles. average delay. C Stable Flow Higher delays resulting from fair Back -ups may develop behind turning > 20 -35 progression and /or longer cycle vehicles. Most drivers feel somewhat lengths. Individual cycle failures may restricted. begin to appear at this level, The number of vehicles stopping is significant, although many still pass through the intersection without stopping. D Approaching The influence of congestion becomes Maneuverability is severely limited > 35 -55 Unstable Flow more noticeable. Longer delays may during short periods due to temporary result in some combination of back ups. unfavorable progression,long cycle lengths, or high volume -to- capacity ratios. Many vehicles stop, and the proportion of vehicles not stopping declines, Individual cycle failures are noticeable. E Unstable Flow Generally considered to be the limit of There are typically long queues of > 55 -80 acceptable delay. Indicative of poor vehicles waiting upstream of the progression, long cycle lengths, and intersection, high volume -to- capacity ratios. Individual cycle failures are frequent occurrences. F Forced Flow Generally considered to be Jammed conditions. Back ups from > 80 unacceptable to most drivers. Often other locations restrict or prevent occurs with oversaturation. May also movement. Volumes may vary widely, occur at high volume -to- capacity depending principally on the ratios. There are many individual downstream back -up conditions. cycle failures. Poor progression and long cycle lengths may also be major contributing factors. References: Highway Capacity Manual, Special Report No, 209, Transportation Research Board, 2000, Highway Capacity Manual, Special Report No. 87, Highway Research Board, 1965. TJKM. c: \tjkm \templates \appendices - pleasanton office\los criteria 2000.doe 07/17/02 DESCRIPTION OF INTERSECTION CAPACITY ANALYSIS UNSIGNALIZED 2000 METHOD Background The method of unsignalized intersection capacity analysis used in this study is from Chapter 17, " Unsignalized Intersections" of the Highway Capacity Manual, Special report No. 209, Transportation Research Board, updated October 2000. This method applies to two -way STOP sign or YIELD sign controlled intersections (or one -way STOP sign or YIELD sign controlled intersections at three -way intersections). At such intersections, drivers on the minor street are forced to use judgement when selecting gaps in the major flow through which to execute crossings or turning maneuvers. Thus, the capacity of the controlled legs of an intersection is based on three factors: 1. The distribution of gaps in the major street traffic stream. 2. Driver judgement in selecting gaps through which to execute their desired maneuvers. 3. Follow -up time required to move into the front -of -queue position. It is assumed that gaps in the traffic stream are randomly distributed. For this reason, the methodology will be less reliable in situations in which the conflicting flows are strongly platooned, as would be the case at many urban intersections where the major street is part of a signalized network. This method assumes that major street traffic is not affected by minor street flows. This assumption is generally good for periods when the operation is smooth and uncongested. (When congestion occurs, it is likely that major street traffic will experience some impedance due to minor street traffic.) Left turns from the major street are assumed to be affected by the opposing major street flow, and minor street traffic is affected by all conflicting movements. Input Data The general procedure to calculate the level of service is as follows: 1. Define existing geometric and volume conditions for the intersection under study. 2. Determine the conflicting traffic through which each minor street movement and the major street left -turn must cross. 3. Determine the size of the gap in the conflicting traffic stream needed by vehicles in each movement crossing the conflicting traffic stream. 4. Determine the capacity of the gaps in the major traffic stream to accommodate each of the subject movements that will utilize these gaps. 5. Adjust the capacities found to account for impedance and the use of shared lanes. 6. Estimate the average total delay for each of the subject movements and determine the level of service for each movement and for the intersection. Gaps are utilized by vehicles in the following priority order: c: \tjkm\ templates \appendices- pleasanton office \unsig. method 2000.doc 07/17/2002 1. Right turns from the minor street 2. Left turns from the major street 3. Through movements from the minor street 4. Left turns from the minor street For example, if a left - turning vehicle on the major street and a through vehicle from the minor street are waiting to cross the major traffic stream, the first available gap of acceptable size would be taken by the left - turning vehicle, The minor street through vehicle must wait for the second available gap. In aggregate terms, a large number of such left- turning vehicles could use up so many of the available gaps that minor street through vehicles are severely impeded or unable to make safe crossing movements. Level of Service See the following table "Level of Service Criteria for Unsignalized Intersections" for the relationship between delay and level of service. LEVEL OF SERVICE CRITERIA FOR UNSIGNALIZED ITNERSECTIONS Control Delay (s /veh) Level of Service Delays 0 -10 A Little or no delay > 10 -15 s /veh B Short traffic delays > 15 -25 s /veh C Average traffic delays > 25 -35 s /veh D Long traffic delays >35 -50 s /veh E Very long traffic delays > 50 s /veh F Extreme traffic delay The level of service criteria for Two -Way STOP controlled intersections is somewhat different from the criteria used in Chapter 16 for signalized intersections. The primary reason for this is the difference that drivers expect a signalized intersection to carry higher traffic volumes than unsignalized intersections. Additionally, several driver behavior conditions combine to make delays at signalized intersections less onerous than at unsignalized intersections. Reference: Highway Capacity Manual, Special Report 209, Transportation Research Board, Update October 2000. c: \tjkm \templates \appendices- pleasanton of ice \unsig, method 2000.doc 07/17/2002 NOTICE TOWN OF LOS GATOS ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REVIEW MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION LEAD AGENCY: Town of Los Gatos Community Development Department 110 East Main Street Los Gatos, CA 95031 PROJECT TITLE: St. Mary's Parish & School Planned Development and New Junior High School Building Planned Development Application PD -11 -006 Mitigated Negative Declaration ND -11 -008 Architecture & Site Application S -12 -098 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The project application includes two components. These involve: 1) establishment of a Planned Development (PD) Zoning District for the project site (Planned Development Application PD -11 -006), including a lot merger for the 59 Victory Lane parcel (APN 510 -44 -028) and modification of the existing Conditional Use Permit (CUP) provisions for student, staff, and parking; and 2) Architectural and Site review for the development of a new junior high school building, renovation of the Lower School Building, and construction of a covered eating area structure. PD Zoning Proposal. The Parish and school management propose to replace aging and outdated facilities to ensure a quality education in modern facilities. The construction of a two -story classroom/library building at the eastern property line would permit the use of current facilities during construction without the use of temporary trailers or rental facilities. Once construction of the new junior high school building is completed, the demolition of the 59 Victory Lane building would then allow for replacement of the parking /play area. In addition, the early 1950's -era 'Grammar School' requires major restoration and much needed expansion. The Parish and school administration seek to create a more distinct Kindergarten area and provide plumbing facilities at each classroom. Complete renovation of the aged restroom facilities would provide compliance with ADA access requirements. The PD application also includes the demolition of the existing "Teen Center," the one -story building on the northeast corner of their campus (Cougar Corner) and construction of a new two -story residential structure. The aging structure is approximately 1,000 s.f. used primarily for child care or teen activities over recent years. In 2009, the Parish received approval from the Town to replace this building with a two - story, single - family home of approximately 3,000 - square -feet to serve as the future rectory, the home of the priests who live on campus and serve the parish community. Although the approval expired, the proposed rectory building is included as part of the PD application for the review of the proposed project's potential cumulative environmental effects. Construction of the residential structure would be subject to Town review and further analysis through an Architecture and Site Application. Currently, the priests reside in a two -story building immediately east of the church. At this existing rectory, 3,035 s.f. are used for the priests' residences and 1,085 s.f. are used for parish offices, meeting FEBRUARY 2013 INITIAL STUDY — 219 BEAN AVENUE space, and storage. Following construction of the future rectory, the entire existing rectory would be converted to parish office and administrative use. The existing Administrative Building would continue to be used for both school and parish administrative uses. The proposed school site improvements would include the following elements: • Construction of a new, approximately 13,500 s.f. classroom building on the campus of St. Mary's parish and school. The building would consist of general education classrooms, a break out room, a science lab, an art classroom, a library, and related office spaces. The building would be two stories above grade with a standard concrete spread footing foundation system and wood frame construction. The building would be Occupancy Type E, Construction Type V -B, and equipped throughout with an automatic fire sprinkler system and fire alarm. • Renovation of the site's one - story, wood -frame classroom building and expansion of the structure with an approximately 1,200 net square foot addition. • Demolition of the one -story building at 59 Victory Lane and lot merger. • Construction of a new, approximately 3,000 square foot covered eating area. • Extension of existing site utilities, pedestrian walkways, and concrete flat work to support new development. • Demolition of the Cougar's Corner building and construction of future rectory. • Renovation of the existing rectory for parish administrative use. The plans for the future rectory requires further Architectural and Site review by the Town. Operational Modifications. Existing operations at St. Mary's School are subject to conditions listed in the CUP described above (CUP U- 84 -17). The 12 original conditions stipulated in that CUP are included as Attachment 1 of the Initial Study. An appeal of the CUP approval by the Town's Planning Commission was denied and the Town Council approved Resolution 1985 -47 imposing the original conditions of approval and the following four conditions: "Conditional Use Permit Application U- 84 -17, Architecture and Site Application S- 84 -60, and Subdivision Application M -84 -21 are approved subject to the conditions of approval set by the Planning Commission and the following additional conditions: 13. The maximum number of seats in the church shall be 654; the maximum number of students enrolled in the school, grades 1' — 8, shall be 265; and the maximum number of employees shall be 20. 14. The Planning Commission shall review the traffic impact and the adequacy of circulation and parking six (6) months after the completion of the improvements. 15. Applicant to revise landscaping plan to replace ficus trees with larger trees and to plant conifers around the perimeter, especially on Victory Lane, Bean Avenue and Tait Avenue, subject to . review by the Director of Parks, Forestry and Maintenance Services. 16. The success of the education program concerning parking and alternatives will be reviewed by the Planning Commission six (6) months after the completion of the improvements." Proposed Operations under the Planned Development. The project sponsor, St. Mary's Parish and School, is requesting modifications to the existing operations to allow for the following: ■ The current student population of 315 pupils would use the new facilities. The Parish and school do not propose to increase the current student enrollment. The current student enrollment FEBRUARY 2013 2 INITIAL STUDY — 219 BEAN AVENUE represents an increase from the enrollment permitted by the 1985 CUP, i.e. 265 students, a net increase of 50 students from the 1985 enrollment level. ■ The current school and church staff of 35.7 full -time equivalent (FTE) employees would use the new facilities. The Parish and school do not propose to increase the current staff (37.5 FTE). The current staff represents an increase from the enrollment listed in the 1985 CUP (20 FTE), a net increase of 15.7 FTE staff. Increased Enrollment. St. Mary's School has been in operation since 1954, and its enrollment has fluctuated according to population trends and the desire of parents to provide their children with values - based education. Enrollment was at more than 400 students in the 19601s. At that time, up to 50 students were assigned to each of St. Mary's classrooms. When the original Conditional Use Permit was issued in 1985, population trends had changed and there were many fewer students to be accommodated in elementary schools. The student population at that time was 237 students in grades 1 -8. In 1999, a local private preschool/kindergarten closed and St. Mary's School added a kindergarten class to help fill this educational void. St. Mary's added a 35- student kindergarten program in academic year 1999 -2000 and the total number of current students is 315. Presently, St. Mary's CUP permits 265 students in grades 1 -8. In 1999, a local private preschool/kindergarten closed and St. Mary's School added a kindergarten class to help fill this educational void. St. Mary's added a 35- student kindergarten program in academic year 1999 -2000 and the total number of current students is 315. St. Mary's Parish and school management are requesting a revision of the original CUP to update the maximum student enrollment to 315 children. The Parish would not increase student enrollment in the future since existing and proposed facilities would not support enrollment beyond current levels (9 Classrooms x 35 Students/Room = 315 Students). Increased Staffing Level. The existing CUP states that 20 employees are permitted to work at the site. The CUP does not address the number of volunteers that may work at the church and school. The applicant has noted that there has been a significant change in the way work is accomplished in churches of all denominations, in all parts of the country. The amount of work has not necessarily increased, but churches are less reliant on volunteers and more dependent on paid staff. Consequently, the number of people working in the administrative office generally has not changed since 1985, but their status has changed from volunteer to employee. When all programs are operating fully, St. Mary's Church employs eight fulltime staff and five part-time staff (equaling 2.1 FTE; one FTE position is equal to 40 hours per week). St. Mary's School is a nine- months -a -year operation. It does not offer summer school. The school currently employs 15 full -time staff and 25 part-time staff (equaling 10.6 FIE). Consequently, the Parish and school currently require 35.7 FTE employees. The applicant is requesting that the permitted operations for St. Mary's Church and School be updated to reflect the 35.7 FTE employees that work there. For parking purposes, the applicant plans to use an employee count of 36. Consistent with this request, the applicant proposes to amend Condition No. 13 of the existing CUP as follows: ■ The maximum number of seats in the church shall be 654; the maximum number of students enrolled in the school, grades K — 8, shall be 315; and the maximum number of employees shall be 35.7 FTE. Parking. Currently, there are a total of 105 parking spaces on the subject property. These include: 1) 72 marked spaces; 2) three (3) garage spaces; and 3) sufficient area for an additional 30 cars in unmarked spaces in the children's "play area" at the center of campus. In addition, the current 59 Victory Lane property has one on -site parking space and six off -site parking credits. The applicant proposes to continue providing the one on -site parking space as required for the Downtown Parking district. FEBRUARY 2013 INITIAL STUDY — 219 BEAN AVENUE The existing CUP recognizes the 105 parking spaces as an approved, nonconforming situation, and Town Code allows nonconforming church uses to continue interminably. There has been no change to the number of seats in the church (654). The applicant indicates that there is more than sufficient space to accommodate the parking demand of employees for both the school and church on a daily operational basis. When school is not in session, such as during weekend masses or evening religious activities, the blacktop playground is used for parking, bringing the total on -site parking capacity to approximately 105 spaces, This parking is self - directed. Also, the required vehicular access to Victory Lane would be maintained as part of the proposed project. The applicant's ongoing communications program educates the parish community about parking options on the St. Mary's property and in adjacent public lots via flyers, bulletins, website (www.stmaryslg.org), and meetings such as State of the School. As part of this program, the school administration asks school families to ride share. Continuing efforts are made to remind parishioners and their guests to be sensitive to the needs and concerns of other residents of the St. Mary's neighborhood. Architecture and Site Review. As part of the proposed site improvements, the applicant is requesting Architecture and Site review for the new Junior High School building, demolition of 59 Victory Lane, renovations to the existing Lower School building, and construction of a new covered eating area structure. The scope of work consists of the following: ■ Construction of a new, approximately 13,500 square foot classroom building on the project site. • Renovations to the existing one -story wood frame classroom building. • Construction of approximately 3,000 s.f. of covered eating area. Extension of site utilities, pedestrian walkways and concrete flatwork to support new development. The applicant is not requesting Architecture and Site review for the proposed future rectory or lower school building additions at this time. DETERMINATION: Although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measure listed below has been added to the project, mitigating potential impacts to a less- than - significant level. An Environmental Impact Report will not be required. STATEMENT OF REASONS TO SUPPORT FINDING: 1. Aesthetics The 4.18 -acre project site is located in downtown Los Gatos and developed with ten buildings that include St. Mary's Church, school buildings, a rectory, and offices for parish and school administration. The buildings are distributed throughout the property along with paved and landscaped areas used as playfields and parking areas, and for general school activities. Views from the project site and surrounding residential uses on Tait and Bean avenues are predominantly of single - family homes and associated mature landscaping that characterize this downtown neighborhood. There are limited and intermittent views of the Santa Cruz Mountains to the south of the town, but these views are extensively screened by mature landscape trees. Consequently, no views of scenic vistas are available from the project area. The proposed project is located in downtown Los Gatos, approximately 950 feet northwest of State Route FEBRUARY 2013 4 INITIAL STUDY — 219 BEAN AVENUE 17 and 0.35 miles south of State Route. 9. Neither of these state highways is designated as a scenic highway in the town of Los Gatos; State Route 9 is a state - designated scenic highway in the city of Saratoga, north of Los Gatos. However, the project site is not visible from either of these highways. Consequently, the project would have no effects on scenic resources within a state scenic highway. The project would involve the establishment of a PD Zoning District for the project site, including a lot merger for the 59 Victory Lane parcel. In addition, the development application entails Architectural and Site review for the development of a new, two -story Junior High School Building (JHSB), demolition of the single -story building at 59 Victory Lane, the renovation of the Lower School Buildings (LSB), and construction of a covered eating area structure. The proposed JHSB would be located on an open, paved portion of the site that currently serves as a play /parking area. The JHSB would be situated between the Lower School Building (LSB) and the 59 Victory Lane structure. Upon completion of the JHSB and transfer of academic activities to this new building, the 59 Victory Lane building would be demolished and a new play /parking area would be constructed as a replacement use for this part of the site. A one - story, covered seating area would be installed immediately north of the new play /parking area; this area is presently an open, turf - covered area associated with the Cougar Corner building. Additionally, new landscaping would be planted around the perimeter of the new play /parking area and covered seating area, including the site area adjoining Victory Lane. It should be noted that proposed physical improvements planned as part of the project would occur on portions of the subject property that are adjacent to Victory Lane, a right -of -way that serves as an alley and services commercial uses along the alley, i.e. 61 Victory Lane, and businesses that front on North Santa Cruz Avenue. Victory Lane is primarily used for service vehicle access to North Santa Cruz Avenue establishments and parking for these commercial uses. The rear fagade (east elevation) of the proposed two -story JHSB would be located on Victory Lane, across and opposite the rear fagade of the Los Gatos Cinema. The maximum building height of the Los Gatos Cinema is 33 -feet, 3- inches. The maximum height of the new JHSB, including mechanical screening, would be 34 -feet, 2- inches. The development of the JHSB at its proposed location would result in building heights consistent with height of the closest off -site structure (Los Gatos Cinema) adjoining the project site. The one -story building at 59 Victory Lane presently provides the school with library, science lab, 8`h grade classroom, Spanish instruction, and art classroom facilities. These academic facilities would be relocated to the new JHSB. The demolition of the 59 Victory Lane building would permit construction of a paved play /parking area, which would replace the similar area to be occupied by the new JHSB. This new play /parking area would be located adjacent to Victory Lane and an existing parking lot at the rear of the commercial building containing six businesses addressed at 47 through 57 North Santa Cruz Avenue. The new play /parking area proposed for the project site would be visually consistent with the existing parking lot across Victory Lane from the site. Views of the project site are primarily available to residents, pedestrians, and vehicles traveling along Tait and Bean avenues to the west and north, respectively, of the project site. All of the currently proposed project development would occur along the eastern perimeter of the site, adjoining Victory Lane. Although portions of the new JHSB would be visible from surrounding streets, on -site, public, and neighboring residential landscaping screens views of the eastern portion of the project site from these two streets and the visual character of the project site would remain unchanged to residents, visitors, and travelers along Tait and Bean avenues. Views of the project site that would be most susceptible to change include those from 61 Victory Lane, the public and private parking lots on Victory Lane opposite of the project site, and Lyndon Avenue. To FEBRUARY 2013 INITIAL STUDY — 219 BEAN AVENUE the extent that the visual character of the project site and its surroundings is defined by the one- and two - story residential and commercial structures of the surrounding downtown area, the proposed project's replacement of one single -story structure with one two -story building would not substantially degrade the visual character of the project site or the project area. The aging structure at 59 Victory Lane would be replaced by a contemporary educational facility that is consistent with the architectural style of other buildings on the campus. In order to assess the potential effects of the proposed project's architecture and site design on the visual character of the project site, the Town required a peer review of the project design plans by the Town's contract architectural consultant, Cannon Design Group (CDG). CDG reviewed the project plans and prepared a report (October 10, 2012) detailing potential concerns with the design submitted to the Town and providing design options to address these issues. The final CDG report is included in this study as Attachment 2 of the Initial Study. Briefly, the CDG review indicates that there are no concerns or issues with the proposed renovation of the LSB and the report includes no recommendations for this project element. The design review report presented five recommendations that would address the design issues for the JHSB. The project applicant and design team reviewed the CDG recommendations and have incorporated them into the project design to address the site and building design issues raised by the CDG report. Consequently, the proposed project would not have a significant effect on the visual character of the project site and surroundings. The proposed PD Zoning designation would also facilitate the development of a two - story, single - family residence (rectory) in the northeast corner of the project site, replacing the existing structure, Cougar's Corner, at this location. The applicant has previously submitted a proposed plan for this building and it was approved on July 15; 2008. The approval has expired and appropriate permits will be required from the Town for future development. The applicant proposes to construct this building at some uncertain future date. Views of the proposed rectory would be available primarily from Bean Avenue and Victory Lane. Views of the existing Cougar's Corner structure are screened by three large redwood trees along the northern perimeter of the project site. These trees are proposed to remain, providing future screening for the proposed rectory as well as shade and other amenities. Consequently, with the retention of these mature trees and additional landscape plantings as recommended by the Town's architectural consultant, the future development of the proposed rectory would have less than significant effects -on the visual character of the project site and adjoining neighborhood. St. Mary's Parish and School buildings currently have exterior lighting fixtures, which are a source of nighttime lighting. Outdoor lighting also would be provided on the exterior of proposed buildings. Proposed lighting would be subject to Section 29.10.09035 of the Zoning Ordinance, which prohibits the production of direct or reflected glare (such as that produced by floodlight) onto any area outside the project boundary. Retention of existing site trees as well as additional landscape plantings would also help reduce the potential for increased nighttime lighting at adjacent properties. 2. Agriculture and Forestry Resources The 4.18 -acre school campus is currently developed with church and school facilities. It has been used as a church and school for over 50 years and would continue in this use with proposed modifications to the operations through the Planned Development application. Since the site is not in agricultural use, the project would not adversely affect any existing agricultural or forest resources or operations. With the surrounding properties in residential use, the proposed project would not adversely affect other agricultural properties or result in the conversion of farmland to non - agricultural use. FEBRUARY 2013 6 INITIAL STUDY — 219 BEAN AVENUE 3. Air Quality Air Quality Planning. The San Francisco Bay Area Air Basin is classified by the Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD) as non - attainment for ozone and inhalable particulates (PM,o). To address these exceedances, the BAAQMD, in cooperation with the MTC and ABAG, prepared the Bay Area 2005 Ozone Strategy (BAOS) in September 2005 and Particulate Matter Implementation Schedule (PMTS) in November 2005. The PMIS discusses how the BAAQMD implements the California Air Resources Board's 103 particulate matter control measures. In September 2010, the BAAQMD adopted the 2010 Bay Area Clean Air Plan (CAP), which updates the BAOS. The most recently adopted air quality plan in the Basin is the 2010 Bay Area Clean Air Plan (CAP). This CAP outlines how the San Francisco Bay Area will attain air quality standards, reduce population exposure and protect public health, and reduce GHG emissions. The consistency of the proposed project with the most recently adopted regional air quality plan, the CAP, is determined by comparing the project's consistency with the Los Gatos 2020 General Plan, which was also adopted in September 2010. Since the CAP is based on the Town's General Plan in effect at the time the CAP was approved, consistency of the project with the 2020 General Plan would indicate consistency with the 2010 CAP. While the proposed school use is allowed under the current General Plan designation of Medium Density Residential, the student population for the site is not defined by the General Plan. However, since there would be no population growth associated with the school use and proposed operations, the project would not conflict with ABAG's 2009 population projections, and therefore, the project would be consistent with the CAP. Air Quality Standards. The BAAQMD is responsible for attaining and /or maintaining air quality in the San Francisco Bay Area Air Basin (SFBAAB) within Federal and State air quality standards. Specifically, the BAAQMD has the responsibility to monitor ambient air pollutant levels throughout the Basin and to develop and implement strategies to attain the applicable Federal and State standards. In June 2010, the BAAQMD adopted CEQA thresholds of significance and updated its CEQA Air Quality Guidelines, which provides guidance for assessing air quality impacts under CEQA. However, on March 5, 2012, the Alameda County Superior Court issued a judgment finding that the BAAQMD had failed to comply with CEQA when it adopted the Thresholds. The court issued a writ of mandate ordering the BAAQMD to set aside the Thresholds and cease dissemination of them until the BAAQMD had complied with CEQA. The matter is now on appeal. Notably, the court's ruling was based purely on procedural grounds, namely, the BAAQMD's failure to comply with CEQA. Nothing in the ruling called into question the validity of the science underlying the recommended significance thresholds. Determining thresholds of air quality impact significance is at the discretion of the Lead Agency under CEQA. Thresholds may be set at the currently unsupported 2010/2011 BAAQMD emissions -based levels, at the adopted 1999 thresholds, or at any scientifically supportable alternative level. Significance Thresholds. Exercising its own discretion as lead agency and similar to many other San Francisco Bay Area jurisdictions, the Town of Los Gatos has decided to rely on the thresholds within the Options and Justification Report (dated October 2009) prepared by the BAAQMD. The BAAQMD Options and Justification Report establishes thresholds based on substantial evidence and are consistent with the thresholds outlined within the 2010 CEQA Air Quality Guidelines. Although BAAQMD failed to comply with CEQA before completing its 2010 recommendations, Town staff believes that these recommendations, which are listed as follows, still represent the best available science on the subject of what constitute significant air quality effects in the SFBAAB: ■ NO, and ROG: 54 pounds /day ■ PM 10: 82 pounds /day ■ PM2.5: 54 pounds /day FEBRUARY 2013 INITIAL STUDY — 219 BEAN AVENUE Project Emissions. The project's construction- related and operational emissions are estimated and compared to the above significance thresholds in Table 1 of the Initial Study. As shown in this table, the project's construction- related and operational air pollutant emissions would not exceed the BAAQMD significance thresholds for criteria pollutants, a less- than - significant impact. However, the BAAQMD recommends the all Basic Construction Mitigation Measures be implemented for all construction projects, whether or not construction- related emissions exceed these significance thresholds. Therefore, the project's construction- related and operational increases in criteria pollutant emissions would be less than significant with implementation of Mitigation Measure AQ -1. Cumulative Air Quality Impacts. To address cumulative impacts on regional air quality, the BAAQMD has established thresholds of significance for construction - related and operational criteria pollutants and precursor emissions. These thresholds represent the levels at which a project's individual emissions of criteria pollutants and precursors would result in a cumulatively considerable contribution to the SFBAAB's existing air quality conditions. If daily average or annual emissions exceed these thresholds, the project would result in a cumulatively significant impact. Since the project's construction- related and operational criteria pollutant emissions would not exceed BAAQMD significance thresholds (as indicated in Table 1), the project's contribution would be less than cumulatively considerable and therefore, less than significant. In addition, when the project's construction - related diesel particulate matter (DPM) emissions are considered with other existing stationary and mobile sources of toxic air contaminants (TACs), the project's contribution to cumulative emissions would not contribution to cumulative construction- related risk and hazard impacts would not be cumulatively considerable, a less-than- significant impact (see Section 3d below for more discussion). Exposure of Sensitive Receptors. The California Air Resources Board (CARB) regulates vehicle fuels with the intent to reduce emissions. Diesel exhaust is a serious concern throughout California. The CARB identified diesel engine particulate matter as a toxic air contaminant and human carcinogen. In 2005, the CARB approved a regulatory measure to reduce emissions of toxic and criteria pollutants by limiting the idling of new heavy -duty diesel vehicles, which altered five sections of Title 13 of the California Code of Regulations. The changes relevant to the proposed project are in Section 2485, Airborne Toxic Control Measure to Limit Diesel - Fueled Commercial Motor Vehicle Idling, which limit idling of a vehicle's primary diesel engine for greater than five minutes in any location (with some exceptions) or operation of a diesel - fueled auxiliary power system within 100 feet of residential areas. Sensitive receptors are defined as facilities or land uses that include members of the population that are particularly sensitive to the effects of air pollutants, such as children, the elderly, and people with illnesses. Examples of these sensitive receptors are residences, schools, hospitals, and daycare centers. The CARB has identified the following groups of individuals as the most likely to be affected by air pollution: the elderly over 65, children under 14, athletes, and persons with cardiovascular and chronic respiratory diseases such as asthma, emphysema, and bronchitis. Students at St. Mary's School are considered to be the closest sensitive receptors to project construction. Combustion emissions from operation of off -road construction equipment on the project site would be generated during project construction and could expose sensitive receptors to diesel particulate matter (DPM) and other toxic air contaminants (TACs) that are associated with various health.risk factors. A screening -level construction- related health risk analysis was completed for the project and impacts on sensitive receptors at the maximally - exposed. individual (MEI) level from DPM emissions (see Figure 1 of Attachment 3 of the Initial Study). The results of the health risk screening are summarized in Table 2 of the Initial Study. As indicated in this table, the project's construction - related DPM emissions would not exceed BAAQMD significance thresholds for cancer and non - cancer health risks (including the FEBRUARY 2013 INITIAL STUDY — 219 BEAN AVENUE highest age sensitivity factor for infants, up to 2 years in age) and therefore, would result in a temporary, less- than - significant health risk to students. In addition to the above construction- related risk and hazard impacts, sensitive receptors.in the project vicinity would be exposed to cumulative risk and hazard impacts from the project's construction- related emissions in combination with existing stationary and mobile sources within approximately 1,000 feet of the project area. When emissions from the SR 17 freeway in addition to two diesel - powered emergency generators located within approximately 1,000 feet of the project are considered, cumulative health risks would be as indicated in Table 3 of the Initial Study. As shown in this table, cumulative emissions would not exceed the Town's cumulative significance thresholds for risk and hazard impacts at new sensitive receptors. Therefore, the project's contribution to cumulative construction- related risk and hazard impacts would not be cumulatively considerable, a less - than - significant impact. Odors. According to the BAAQMD CEQA Air Quality Guidelines, land uses associated with odor complaints typically include wastewater treatment plants, landfills, confined animal facilities, composting stations, food manufacturing plants, refineries, and chemical plants. The project would not include any uses identified by the BAAQMD as being associated with odors. No new or unusual sources of nuisance odors would be associated with the proposed expansion of school operations. Therefore, the project's potential for nuisance odor problems would be less than significant. During project construction, however, nuisance diesel odors associated with operation of diesel construction equipment on -site (primarily during initial grading phases) could occur, but this effect would be localized, sporadic, and short -term in nature. Therefore, temporary impacts from nuisance diesel odors on adjacent residential receptors is considered to be less than significant. Mitigation Measures — Air Quality (AQ). Although the project's construction - related air pollutant emissions would not exceed the BAAQMD's applicable significance thresholds, the following measures are recommended by the BAAQMD to reduce the project's construction emissions: AQ -1: Basic Construction Measures. To limit the project's construction - related dust and criteria pollutant emissions, the following BAAQMD- recommended Basic Construction Mitigation Measures shall be included in the project's grading plan, building plans, and contract specifications: a. All exposed surfaces (e.g., parking areas, staging areas, soil piles, graded areas, and unpaved access roads) shall be watered two times per day. b. All haul trucks transporting soil, sand, or other loose material off -site shall be covered. c. All visible mud or dirt track -out onto adjacent public roads shall be removed using wet power vacuum street sweepers at least once per day. The use of dry power sweeping is prohibited. d. All vehicle speeds on unpaved roads shall be limited to 15 mph. e. All roadways, driveways, and sidewalks to be paved shall be completed as soon as possible. f. Idling times shall be minimized either by shutting equipment off when not in use or reducing the maximum idling time to five minutes (as required by the California airborne toxics control measure Title 13, Section 2485 of California Code of Regulations [CCR]). Clear signage shall be provided for construction workers at all access points. g. All construction equipment shall be maintained and properly tuned in accordance with manufacturer's specifications. All equipment shall be checked by a certified mechanic and determined to be running in proper condition prior to operation. h. Post a publicly visible sign with the telephone number and person to contact at the Town regarding dust complaints. This person shall respond and take corrective action within 48 FEBRUARY 2013 INITIAL STUDY — 219 BEAN AVENUE hours. The BAAQMD's phone number shall also be visible to ensure compliance with applicable regulations. 4. Biological Resources The project site is located in the downtown area of Los Gatos and comprises 4.18 acres of institutional uses, including a church, school and administrative buildings, and ancillary structures. The site contains 10 buildings with extensive areas paved as play /parking facilities. Vegetation on the property is limited to landscaping on the perimeter of site and around buildings. A turf - covered sports field is situated in the southwest corner of the site. The habitat value of site vegetation is limited to urban- adapted species. There are no federally protected wetlands, riparian habitat, or other sensitive natural communities, nor are there any fish or wildlife migratory corridors or nursery sites on the site or in its vicinity. The Town of Los Gatos' Tree Protection Ordinance (Section 29.10.0950 — 29.10.1045 of the Zoning Ordinance) prohibits the removal of any protected tree without first obtaining a permit. The intent of the Tree Ordinance is to "preserve the scenic beauty" of the Town of Los Gatos by maintaining existing trees and to replace trees when they are removed. Under the Tree Ordinance, trees are evaluated based on their physical characteristics, but not on their biological function or eligibility for protected status under state or federal regulations. The Los Gatos Tree Protection Ordinance states that the preferred tree replacement is two or more trees of a species and size designated by the Director of the Parks and Public Works Department. Tree replacement requirements are based on canopy size, which is defined in Table 3 -1 of the Ordinance, Tree Canopy — Replacement Standard. Tree canopy replacement requirements range from two to six 24 -inch box size trees or two 36 -inch and /or 48 -inch box size trees, depending on the canopy size of the tree to be removed. A tree survey was prepared for the project by the Town's consulting arborist, Deborah Ellis, on May 1, 2012 with updates on October 17, 2012 and January 10, 2013. Copies of these studies are on file with the Los Gatos Community Development Department. The arborist's assessment and revised project plans serve as the basis for the following evaluation of the project's potential effects on trees at the property. The tree survey identified a total of 81 ordinance -size trees of various species on the project site. The majority of the site's trees are located on the western portion of the site and would be unaffected by the proposed project. The eastern part of the site contains 13 trees that potentially could be affected by the development plans for the school facilities. Review of the arborist's evaluations and consultation with the applicant's project planning team has resulted in the determination that three trees ( #'s 62, 64, and 81) would be removed; the project design modifications permit the retention of three additional trees ( #'s 58, 59, and 69) that possibly would have required removal for project implementation. As a result, tree removal proposed by the project would be limited to the three trees (3.7% of total site trees) described above. The project's proposed Landscape Plan indicates that 21 trees would be planted to replace the three removed trees. Subject to the approval of the Town, this level of tree replacement would be consistent with the requirement of the Tree Protection Ordinance. With required conformance to the Town's Tree Protection Ordinance, the project would not conflict with any local ordinances or policies protecting trees. The proposed project would not be in conflict with any approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan. FEBRUARY 2013 10 INITIAL STUDY — 219 BEAN AVENUE 5. Cultural Resources Historical Resources. Project implementation would result in demolition of an existing building (59 Victory Lane) on the site. This building does not meet Town standards and guidelines for historical resources: (1) the project site is not located within an historic district; (2) the site and site structures do not have historical designations; and (3) structures on the site were constructed after 1941 and have no architectural or historic significance. Therefore, no significant impacts on historic resources would result from the proposed demolition. Archaeological Resources and Human Remains. The project site is already developed and surface soils were disturbed during construction of the church, school, administrative buildings, and play /parking area on the subject property. Although the site is not located adjacent to Los Gatos Creek, the potential for encountering cultural resources cannot be completely eliminated due to the site's proximity to the creek (approximately 1,000 feet) and relatively level topography. The lack of recorded prehistoric archaeological sites may be due to the relatively early historic buildout of this area, which precluded the systematic search for archaeological resources that may have been associated with the riparian zone of Los Gatos Creek, which is located less than 1,000 feet to the east of the project area. This riparian zone would have been an ideal habitation location for Native Americans, who utilized the food resources and availability of water during their annual movements between numerous seasonal villages and campsites in the Santa Clara Valley. Archaeological resources have been recorded at several locations north of the Vasona Reservoir and along adjacent watercourses found in nearby San Jose; their presence suggests that the project area has a moderate potential for containing archaeological resources under the paving and buildings currently covering the site. Since almost the entire site is covered with buildings or pavement, a visual inspection of the site was not possible, but the potential for discovery of obscured cultural resources during future development of the project site would still remain, a potentially significant impact. However, implementation of Mitigation Measures CUL -1 through CUL -5 would reduce this impact to a less- than - significant impact. Paleontological Resources. Paleontological resources are the fossilized remains of plants and animals, including vertebrates (animals with backbones), invertebrates (e.g., starfish, clams, ammonites, and marine coral), and fossils of microscopic plants and animals (microfossils). The age and abundance of fossils depend on the location, topographic setting, and particular geologic formation in which they are found. Fossil discoveries not only provide a historic record of past plant and animal life, but may assist geologists in dating rock formations. A review of records maintained by the University of California Museum of Paleontology in Berkeley indicates that the closest paleontological resources recorded in Santa Clara County occur approximately 15.5 miles west of Los Gatos. These resources were discovered in geologic strata dating from the Late Pliocene and Miocene epochs of the Tertiary Period (65 to 1.8 million years ago). Geologic mapping for the proposed project indicates the site is underlain by Pleistocene alluvial fan deposits. These deposits are more recent and differ in age from those containing the recorded paleontological resources. Consequently, the potential for encountering paleontological resources at the project site is considered to be low. Mitigation Measures — Cultural Resources (CUL). The following measures shall be implemented by the project applicant to reduce the project's potential impact on archaeological resources to a less -than- significant level: CUL -la Alert Construction Personnel. Construction personnel involved with earthmoving shall be alerted to the potential for the discovery of prehistoric materials and in particular, concentrations of historic artifacts. Prehistoric archaeological resources could include but not FEBRUARY 2013 11 INITIAL STUDY — 219 BEAN AVENUE be limited to the following: darker than surrounding soils of a friable nature, concentrations of stone, bone or fresh water shellfish, artifacts of these materials, and evidence of fire (ash, charcoal, fire altered earth or rock) and of course, burials, both human and animal. CUL -2: Halt of Construction If Archaeological Traces Are Encountered. In the event that archaeological traces are encountered, all construction within a 20 -foot radius of the find shall be halted, the Community Development Director shall be notified, and an archaeologist shall be retained to examine the find and make appropriate recommendations. CUL -3: Plan for Eligible Resources. In the event that it appears further earthmoving will affect a resource eligible for the California Register of Historic Resource (CRHR), a plan for evaluation of the resource through limited hand excavation should be submitted to the Town's Community Development Department for approval. If evaluative testing demonstrates that the project will affect a CRHR eligible resource, a plan for the mitigation of impacts to the resource should be submitted, to the Community Development Department for approval before construction is allowed inside the zone designated as archaeologically sensitive. CUL -4: Preliminary Archaeological Report. If the Community Development Director finds that the archaeological find is not a significant resource, work will resume only after the submittal of a preliminary archaeological report and after provisions for reburial and ongoing monitoring are accepted. Provisions for identifying descendants of a deceased Native American and for reburial will follow the protocol set forth in CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5(e). If the site is found to be a significant archaeological site, a mitigation program will be prepared and submitted to the Community Development Director for consideration and approval, in conformance with the protocol set forth in Public Resources Code Section 21083.2. CUL -5: Final Archaeological Report. A final report shall be prepared when a find is determined to be a significant archaeological site, and/or when Native American remains are found on the site. The final report will include background information on the completed work, a description and list of identified resources, the disposition and curation of these resources, any testing, other recovered information, and conclusions. 6. Geologic, Soils, and Seismic Hazards A review of the Town's hazards maps indicates that the project site has a moderate to high potential for fault rupture, negligible slope stability hazard, moderate potential for seismic shaking, moderate shrink - swell potential, low potential for liquefaction, slight to moderate erosion hazard, and no debris flow hazards. The Town's Fault Map indicates that the site is located approximately 300 feet south of an area mapped as Concentration of Coseismic Ground Deformation where linear depressions indicative of faulting are present. At a minimum, the proposed Junior High School Building would be expected to be subject to strong groundshaking during its design life. However, it should be noted that most of the Bay Area as well as surrounding residences are subject to groundshaking hazards. As a standard project condition, the Town will require preparation of a soil engineering report; this report will address any soil engineering . constraints and specify criteria and standards in accordance with the Uniform Building Code (UBC) for site grading, drainage, pavement design, retaining wall design, erosion control, and foundation design. UBC standards account for a development's vulnerability to seismic hazards based on its proximity to active faults and Los Gatos utilizes a different section of the UBC seismic table due its proximity to Class B faults. Therefore, compliance with applicable UBC requirements would be adequate to address regional seismic safety concerns such as groundshaking. Assuming all recommendations of the required FEBRUARY 2013 12 INITIAL STUDY — 219 BEAN AVENUE report are incorporated into the project design, no significant impacts from soil engineering constraints would be anticipated. 7. Greenhouse Gases "Greenhouse gases" (so called because of their role in trapping heat near the surface of the earth) emitted by human activity are implicated in global climate change, commonly referred to as "global warming." These greenhouse gases contribute to an increase in the temperature of the earth's atmosphere by transparency to short wavelength visible sunlight, but near opacity to outgoing terrestrial long wavelength heat radiation. The principal greenhouse gases (GHGs) are carbon dioxide, methane, nitrous oxide, ozone, and water vapor. Fossil fuel consumption in the transportation sector (on -road motor vehicles, off - highway mobile sources, and aircraft) is the single largest source of GHG emissions, accounting for approximately half of GHG emissions globally. Industrial and commercial sources are the second largest contributors of GHG emissions with about one - fourth of total emissions. Significance Criteria. Exercising its own discretion as lead agency and similar to other San Francisco Bay Area jurisdictions, the Town of Los Gatos has decided to rely on the thresholds within the Options and Justification Report (dated October 2009) prepared by the BAAQMD. The BAAQMD Options and Justification Report establishes thresholds based on substantial evidence and are consistent with the thresholds outlined within the BAAQMD's 2011 CEQA Air Quality Guidelines. Although BAAQMD failed to comply with CEQA before completing its 2010 recommendations, Town staff believes that these recommendations still represent the best available science on the subject of what constitutes significant GHG effects on climate change and they are as follows: ■ Compliance with a Qualified Climate Action Plan (or similar adopted policies, ordinances, and programs) that includes enforceable measures to reduce GHG emissions consistent with AB 32 goals or Executive Order S -03 -05 targets; OR ® 1,100 MT CO2e per year OR ■ 6.7 MT CO2e per capita per year (residential) / 4.6 MT CO2e per service population per year (mixed use) For purposes of this report, project compliance with the 1,100 MT CO2e /year threshold is used as the primary basis to determine significance. The project's consistency with operative goals and policies of the Sustainability Plan that are designed to avoid environmental impacts also is analyzed as a secondary basis for assessing significance. To fully implement the Sustainability Plan, though, the Town Council must take a number of future steps, such as adopting a Green Building Ordinance and developing GreenPoint Rated Building Guidelines. Consistency of any proposed project or program with the Sustainability Plan is one of the criteria used to determine the significance of a project's GHG emissions under CEQA. Because many of the Plan's most stringent aspects will only become fully operational when such future measures are in place, however, compliance with existing Sustainability Plan requirements, by itself, is not sufficient at this time to support a determination that a project's greenhouse gas emissions are less than significant by definition. Although the Plan contains a comprehensive long -range strategy to achieve sustainability in transportation, land use, energy conservation, water use, solid waste reduction and open space preservation, the Plan will not be fully implemented until the Town Council takes a number of future steps, such as adopting a Green Building Ordinance and developing GreenPoint Rated Building Guidelines. When these steps have been taken, the Town intends that compliance with the Plan and its implementing actions (e.g., the Green Building Ordinance) should be sufficient by itself to reduce projects' greenhouse gas emissions to less than significant levels. (See CEQA Section 15183.5 I- BRUARY 2013 13 INITIAL STUDY — 219 BEAN AVENUE [compliance with the requirements of a plan to reduce greenhouse gas emissions may be sufficient to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions from individual projects to less -than- significant levels].) Short -term GHG emissions would be generated by project - related construction activities. The BAAQMD does not have a quantitative significance threshold for construction- related GHG emissions, but the project's construction- related GHG emissions are expected to have a less- than - significant impact ono global climate change. GHG modeling completed for this project indicates that project construction would generate up to approximately 173 metric tons of CO2- equivalents (MT CO2e) per year. For comparison purposes, this emissions rate is well below this report's operational threshold of 1,100 metric tons (MT) of CO2e per year, which would be an indication that the project's construction - related GHG emissions would be less than significant. The proposed project would also be subject to the existing CARB regulation (Title 13 of the California Code of Regulations, Section 2485); which limits idling of diesel - fueled commercial motor vehicles, and compliance with this regulation would further reduce GHG emissions associated with project construction vehicles (compliance with idling limits is required under Mitigation Measure AQ -1 in Section 3, Air Quality). The BAAQMD also encourages implementation of construction- related GHG reduction strategies where feasible, such as: using alternative- fueled (e.g., biodiesel, electric) construction vehicles /equipment such that these vehicles /equipment comprise at least 15 percent of the fleet; using local building materials such that these materials comprise at least 10 percent of all construction materials; and recycling or reusing at least 50 percent of construction waste or demolition materials. None of these measures is specifically proposed as part of the project. The CaIEEMod 2011. 1.1 computer model was used to calculate GHG emissions that would be generated by the proposed addition of 50 students and a net addition of 9,565 s.f. of space at the school. The proposed project is estimated to generate approximately 88 MT' CO2e per year (Table 4 of the Initial Study). Such an increase would not exceed this report's significance threshold of 1,100 MT CO2e per year. Therefore, the project's operational GHG emissions would be less than significant. Greenhouse Gas Reduction Plans, Policies, and Regulations. California has passed several bills and the Governor has signed at least three executive orders regarding greenhouse gases. The Governor's Office of Planning and Research is in the process of developing CEQA significance thresholds for GHG emissions but thresholds have yet to be established. GHG statutes and executive orders (EO) include EO S -1 -07, EO S -3 -05, EO S- 13 -08, EO S- 14 -08, EO S- 20 -04, EO S- 21 -09, AB 32, AB 341, AB 1493, AB 3018, SB 97, SB375, SB 1078 and 1.07, SB 1368, and SB X12. AB 32 establishes regulatory, reporting, and market mechanisms to reduce statewide GHG emissions to 1990 levels by 2020. Pursuant to this requirement, the California Air Resources Board (CARB) adopted its Scoping Plan, which contains the main strategies to achieve required reductions by 2020. As indicated above, the project's construction - related and operational GHG emissions would not exceed this report's significance threshold of 1,100 MT. This threshold is based on the BAAQMD's 2011 CEQA Air Quality Guidelines, which in turn, relates to AB 32 GHG reduction goals. Therefore, the project's GHG emissions would not conflict with plans and policies adopted' for the purpose of reducing GHG emissions, a less- than - significant impact. In October 2012, the Town of Los Gatos adopted a Sustainability Plan, which outlines communitywide GHG emission reduction measures necessary to reduce GHG emissions in Los Gatos. By 2020, the Sustainability Plan documents that GHG emissions will be reduced by approximately 15% from the business -as -usual (BAU) assumption. The emissions reductions vary by sector. The Sustainability Plan contains GHG reduction measures and implements goals and policies of the Environment and Sustainability Element of the General Plan. In general, the proposed project would be consistent with currently applicable Sustainability Plan GHG reduction measures and associated General Plan policies (see project consistency analysis table in the Initial Study). FEBRUARY 2013 14 INITIAL STUDY — 219 BEAN AVENUE Given the proximity transit facilities, to the school, presence of bicycle and pedestrian facilities in the school vicinity, less- than - significant increase in GHG emissions, and the project's consistency with the above GHG reduction measures, the proposed project would not hinder the state's GHG reduction goals established by AB 32, a less- than - significant impact. 8. Hazards and Hazardous Materials The project site is not included on any Hazardous Wastes and Substances Sites List. The 59 Victory Lane and Cougar's Corner buildings and ancillary facilities are proposed to be demolished as part of the project. If these buildings contain asbestos or lead- containing paint, demolition could result in airborne release of hazardous building materials, such as asbestos fibers or lead dust. Proposed demolition would be required to comply with state and federal regulations for inspection and removal of hazardous building materials, including asbestos - containing materials and lead- containing substances. If found to be present in building materials to be removed, asbestos and /or lead abatement practices such as containment and removal would be required prior to demolition or renovation. In addition, the project applicant will be required to obtain clearance for asbestos removal from the Bay Area Air Quality Management District prior to issuance of a demolition permit. Therefore, due to existing regulations, the potential for public health hazards associated with the release of airborne asbestos fibers at the project. site would be considered less than significant. Implementation of Mitigation Measure HAZ -1 would be required to reduce potential health hazards associated with lead -based paints to a less - than - significant level. Mitigation Measures — Hazards (HAZ). In addition to implementing asbestos abatement requirements, the project applicant will implement the following additional measure to mitigate other public health risks associated with lead -based paints to a less - than - significant level: HAZ -1: Abatement of Lead -Based Paints. Prior to proposed building demolition, construction finish materials that are suspect for containing lead -based paint will be tested, and pending laboratory analysis, will not be subjected to any process which renders them friable unless proper engineering controls and worker protection procedures are initiated. 9. Hydrology and Water Quality The project site is located in the urbanized, storm - sewered Downtown area of Los Gatos, in the Los Gatos Creek watershed. Storm drains in the area discharge into Los Gatos Creek, and this creek flows through Campbell and San Jose, joining Guadalupe River approximately seven miles downstream of the project site. Stream flows ultimately discharge into San Francisco Bay via Alviso Slough. Los Gatos Creek is a Santa Clara Valley Water District (SCVWD) water management facility, and flows into Vasona Reservoir and then several percolation basins in San Jose prior to joining the Guadalupe River. Water Quality. The Federal National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Program regulates water quality degradation. This program was established by the Clean Water Act to control and reduce pollutants carried to water bodies from point and non -point discharges. In California, the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) administers the NPDES permitting program through nine Regional Water Quality Control Boards (RWQCB). The NPDES permit for the Town of Los Gatos is a permit that is issued to the Santa Clara Valley Urban Runoff Pollution Prevention Program ( SCVURPPP), an association of thirteen cities /towns in the Santa Clara Valley (including Los Gatos), Santa Clara County, and the Santa Clara Valley Water District. SCVURPPP participants share a common NPDES permit to discharge stormwater to South San Francisco Bay. To reduce pollution in urban runoff to the "maximum" extent practicable, the SCVURPP incorporates regulatory, monitoring, and outreach measures aimed at improving the water quality of South San Francisco Bay and the streams of Santa Clara Valley. FEBRUARY 2013 15 INITIAL STUDY — 219 BEAN AVENUE The development plans for the project would demolish and replace existing school facilities with a new classroom building (Junior High School Building) and renovate existing classroom facilities. The current site use includes 134,484 s.f. (3.09 ac.) of impervious surface on the 182,081 s.f. (4.18 ac.) property, constituting approximately 74 percent of the site surface. The proposed project would replace existing impervious surface area with 24,710 s.f. (0.57 ac.) of new and replacement impervious surface; approximately 2,650 s.f. of this amount of impervious surface would be new, additional impervious surface. This would represent approximately 1.4 percent of the total site area. Total post - project impervious surface area would be 137,134 s.f., approximately 75 percent of total project site area. The construction proposed by the project plans would be a potential source for erosion and downstream sedimentation if soil materials exposed during project construction were accidentally released. Consequently, the project's construction activities would have the potential to degrade local water quality in Los Gatos Creek. As stipulated for Regulated Projects under the NPDES permit provisions, the proposed development would remove and replace more than 10,000 s.f. of impervious area and must implement design, control, and engineered treatment measures. For the purposes of stormwater management and water. quality control, project plans include a conceptual stormwater management plan that identifies proposed pervious and impervious surfaces, disposition of anticipated runoff volumes, and stormwater treatment methods to safeguard water quality in site runoff. Stormwater treatment regulations effective December 1, 2011 require that each Regulated Project treat 100 percent of the design storm runoff from a project's drainage area with low impact development (LID) treatment measures onsite or at a joint stormwater treatment facility. LID measures include Rainwater Harvesting, Infiltration, Evapotranspiration, and Biotreatment (if prior LID measures are determined to be infeasible). Beginning December 1, 2011, projects submitted for Planning approval that create or replace 10,000 square feet of impervious surface ( "Regulated Projects ") are subject to LID treatment requirements. Future Architecture and Site approvals for this project will be subject to the LID ! requirements if approved after December 1, 2011. Projects which disturb one or more acres of soil, or projects which disturb less than one acre but are part of a larger common plan of development that in total disturbs one or more acres, are required to obtain coverage under the General Permit for Discharges of Storm Water Associated with Construction Activity. Since the area disturbed during construction is less than one acre, the project would not be required to obtain coverage under the State's General Permit for Storm Water Discharges Associated with Construction Activity. The State Regional Water Quality Control Board implemented a new General Construction Permit (Order 2009- 0009 -DWQ), which became effective July 1, 2010. Implementation of the Town- approved SWPPP and additional monitoring and reporting requirements specified in the General Construction Permit during project construction would ensure that potential construction- related water quality impacts would be less than significant. To ensure compliance with stormwater treatment and disposal requirements, the Town's contract engineering consultant, Eisenberg, Olivieri & Associates (EOA), reviewed drainage and stormwater management plans submitted to the Town. The final EOA review was conducted in February 2013 (included as Attachment 4 of the Initial Study). The review of the project submittals for compliance with the Town of Los Gatos' NPDES Permit indicate that the conceptual stormwater treatment measures proposed for the project appear to be adequate to meet the Town's NPDES Permit Provision C.3 requirements. The EOA memorandum also makes three recommendations with respect to the project's stormwater management plans. These include: • Approval of the project's Stormwater Management Plan; • Compliance with landscaping provisions of the SCVURPPP C.3 Stormwater Handbook; and FEBRUARY 2013 16 INITIAL STUDY — 219 BEAN AVENUE ■ Maintenance of the biotreatment pond and source control measures by the project applicant. The Town will incorporate these provisions as conditions of approval for the project, Groundwater Resources. The proposed project would replace and add impervious surfaces to the subject property located in the urbanized Downtown area of Los Gatos. The project would not deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre - existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted. The project's plans for an on -site biotreatment pond would further promote on -site infiltration of storm runoff collected from project impervious surfaces. Drainage. Elevations on the site range from approximately 422 feet above mean sea level (MSL) at the southwest corner of the property to a low of about 408 feet at the northeast corner of the property. The site generally consists of an extensive, level area that slopes gently to the northeast. The project site is developed with several structures associated with the church and school services on the project site. Extensive paving for driveway and parking along with these buildings cover approximately 74 percent of the 4.18 -acre site. Storm drainage from the site's impervious surfaces is collected in the on -site storm drain system and conveyed to the municipal storm drain system (18 -inch storm drain) in Bean Avenue, adjoining the northern perimeter of the project site. Presently, runoff flows from the project site are not treated for the removal of urban pollutants and water contaminants. As described above, impervious surfaces on the property cover approximately 3.09 acres of the 4.18 -acre property, The proposed project would increase the extent of impervious surface area to 3.15 acres on the site. This would represent approximately 75 percent of the total site area, resulting in a minor increase of impervious surface area on the site. The increased surface flows from the project site could be accommodated by the bioretention pond proposed as part of the project and the existing municipal storm drain facilities located in Bean Avenue, and development would have a less- than - significant impact on municipal drainage facilities. Flood Hazards. According to the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) (May 18, 2009) for Los Gatos, the project site is located in Zone X, consisting of areas with 0.2% annual chance of flood, areas of one percent annual chance flood with average depths of less than one foot or with drainage areas less than one square mile, and areas protected by levees from one percent chance flood. The FEMA Flood Zones map (Figure SAF -4) of the 2020 General Plan Safety Element also indicates that the project site is located outside mapped 100 -year flood hazard areas. Mapping of dams and dam inundation areas provided by the Safety Element (Figure SAF -5) of the recent updated 2020 General Plan for the Town provides information on areas within the community that may be potentially affected by inundation from dam failure. Based on the review of this and supporting maps, the project site is not in an area designated as a dam failure inundation area. The potential for flooding hazards on the site from storm events and dam failure would be less than significant. 10. Land Use and Planning The Los Gatos General Plan designates the project area as "Medium Density Residential; 5 - 12 dwelling units /acre." This designation allows for residential uses at densities of 5 to 12 units per acre. The Zoning Ordinance designates the project area as "R -1D, Single Family Residential, Downtown." The existing school use is allowed within this zone with a Conditional Use Permit (CUP). Proposed changes to the operations would not alter the type of use allowed on this site, but would alter the level of use. Proposed operational modifications would be allowed under the existing General Plan and Zoning designations. FEBRUARY 2013 17 INITIAL STUDY — 219 BEAN AVENUE The project would not alter the use of the school property and therefore, the project would not pose any new land use compatibility problems. However, the project would increase student enrollments, which would thereby increase the potential for land use conflicts related to increased traffic, noise, and criteria air pollutants. The effects of such increases are addressed elsewhere in this report under Sections 3, Air Quality, 12, Noise, and 16, Transportation /Traffic. The Los Gatos General Plan does not identify any habitat conservation plans or natural community conservation plans that apply to the project area. 11a. Mineral Resources The Los Gatos General Plan does not identify any regionally or locally - important mineral resources on the project site or in its vicinity. 12. Noise A detailed noise assessment study was completed by Edward L. Pack Associates, Inc. in November 2012 and is included in Attachment 5 of the Initial Study. Noise measurement and modeling data are included in Appendix C of the Pack study. Noise - Sensitive Receptors. Certain land uses are particularly sensitive to noise, including schools, hospitals, rest homes, long -term medical and mental care facilities, places of worship, and parks and recreation areas. Residential areas are also considered noise sensitive, especially during the nighttime hours. While the project site itself is considered to be a sensitive receptor with school and church facilities located on the site, existing sensitive receptors located in the project vicinity include residential uses located immediately adjacent to the project site on Bean Avenue, Tait Avenue, and West Main Street. Applicable. Noise Guidelines and Standards. The Noise Element of the Los Gatos 2020 General Plan establishes goals and policies for reducing noise levels in the Town. Policies aimed at reducing noise levels must address specific sources of unwanted noise, as well as noise - sensitive receptors. The Noise Element contains guidelines for use in land use planning to reduce future noise and land use incompatibilities (Figure NOI -1 of the Noise Element). The acceptable limit for residential use is 55 decibels (dB) day -night average sound level (DNL). The Town's Noise Element (Policy NOI -1.3) states that these noise limits represent the "long range community aspirations and acknowledges that such goals may not be attainable at this time. The acceptable limit for commercial use is 70 dBA Leq(24). The L,gc24> is the 24 -hour average Ley, which is not time - weighted like the DNL. Because the Leq(24) noise exposures in the vicinity of the school are currently below 60 dBA, no further analysis is required of the noise impacts on commercial uses located adjacent to the school. The Town of Los Gatos Noise Ordinance also contains noise limits that are based on local ambient baseline noise levels that are shown on maps published by the Town and provided within the Ordinance. Noise zones were created throughout the Town with varying ambient sound level based on three periods over the 24 -hour day. The Noise Ordinance maps are provided to simplify the ambient determination process, as ambient conditions can be difficult to quantify under given circumstances. However, when the ambient can be measured, the measured value is used to supersede the map value. The ordinance limits increases in noise for residential areas to 6 dB above the ambient. With respect to the project proposal, the Noise Ordinance is applicable to mechanical equipment associated with the new or modified buildings, school operations, and construction activities. The project- generated noise exposures were evaluated against the guidelines of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). CEQA does not limit noise levels or noise exposures nor does it quantify noise exposure or noise level increases over the ambient to define noise impacts. CEQA FEBRUARY 2013 18 INITIAL STUDY — 219 BEAN AVENUE evaluates a project as a significant noise impact if it "...causes a substantial increases in the ambient noise levels... ". The quantification of the threshold of significance is left up to the local jurisdiction. The Los Gatos General Plan Noise Element does not provide thresholds of significance in the General Plan. Therefore, the following thresholds of significance, based on CEQA case law, shall be applied at the existing residential areas to the west and north of the site where there is a potential for noise impacts. These thresholds are: ■ causing the DNL in existing residential areas to increase by 5 dB or more and remain below 55 dB DNL; ■ causing the DNL in existing residential areas to increase by 3 dB or more and, thereby, exceed 55 dB DNL; ■ causing the DNL in existing residential areas to increase by 1 dB or more if the current noise exposure exceeds 55 dB DNL. If the project causes any of the above three criteria to occur, the project will be considered a significant noise impact to the areas where it occurs and mitigation measures will be required. Existing Noise Levels. The primary sources of noise in the project vicinity are traffic on Bean Avenue, Tait Avenue and West Main Street, commercial traffic /activity along Victory Lane, play area noise associated with St. Mary's School, and residential noise (landscaping /gardening and construction) at the surrounding residences. To determine the existing noise environments at the most impacted residential property boundaries across Bean Avenue and at homes adjacent to the school's playfield, continuous recordings of the sound levels were made at two locations. Measurement locations are indicated on Figure 2 in Attachment 5 of the Initial Study. Measurement Location 1 was at the curb of Bean Avenue, 16 feet from the centerline of the road at the side of the home at 100 Wilder Avenue. Measurement Location 2 was at the south property line of the home at 30 Tait Avenue near the rear fagade of the home. This measurement location was used to better segregate playfield noise from traffic noise and noise from a residential construction project that was occurring across Tait Avenue. The noise recordings were made for a total period of 24 consecutive hours and included measurements during the daytime and nighttime periods of the DNL index. Noise measurements results are summarized in Tables II and III of Attachment 5 of the Initial Study. Because the measured noise levels represent the "existing plus project' ' condition, the measured noise levels were adjusted to reflect "existing" conditions at the permitted student enrollment levels. As shown in these tables, "existing" noise levels were as follows: ■ 100 Wilder Avenue (closest residence to the north): 52 to 53 dB DNL at most impacted exterior area and most impacted unshielded building fagade of the home. ■ 30 Tait Avenue (closest residence to the south): 55 dB DNL at most impacted exterior area and most impacted unshielded building fagade of the home. Noise Compatibility of Proposed Uses. When the noise measurements presented above are compared to the above Town's noise compatibility guidelines for school uses, existing noise levels are considered acceptable for school uses. Therefore, project implementation would not pose any significant noise compatibility problems within the existing school and church operation. Existing noise exposures at the closest residential properties to the school site are considered acceptable (at or below the 55 dB DNL limit of the Noise Element). See Section 12c, Long -term Noise Increases, below for discussion of the project's noise impact on these residences. FEBRUARY 2013 19 INITIAL STUDY - 219 BEAN AVENUE Groundborne Noise and Vibration. Since construction of project facilities would not involve construction of subsurface facilities (i.e. tunnels or basements), generation of construction- related groundborne noise levels that could result in noise disturbance at the closest residential receptors would be less than significant. In addition, since project construction would not involve use of impact equipment (i.e. pile drivers), generation of construction- related groundborne vibration that could result in cosmetic damage to adjacent structures would be less than significant. In general, cosmetic or threshold damage to adjacent buildings could occur if vibrations exceeded 0.5 inches per second (in /sec) peak particle velocity (PPV). In general, vibration velocities from typical heavy construction equipment (used for projects similar to the proposed project) range from 0,012 to 0.352 in /sec PPV at 10 feet from the source of activity. Since heavy equipment would be operated in the vicinity of the proposed junior high school building and this building would be located more than 10 feet from adjacent structures, the effects of construction - related vibration would be less than significant. Long -term Noise Increases. The Los Gatos Noise Element specifies Outdoor Noise Limits of 55 dB DNL for residential uses, and these levels are applied as the Town's significance threshold for noise compatibility with adjacent uses. In addition, the project would be subject to noise limits specified in the Los Gatos Noise Ordinance. For residential uses, the Noise Ordinance specifies a limit of 6 decibels above the average ambient (LeQ) sound level. Project - related noise impacts on the area surrounding the proposed school would include project - generated traffic and changes in school operations. Project implementation would increase the school's enrollment from 265 to 315 students, increase staff levels, modify the existing lower school building, and permit the construction of a new junior high school building, covered eating area structure, and rectory. The main playground area would mostly remain the same with the exception of one portion along Victory Lane where the existing classroom building would be demolished and a new junior high building would be built farther to the south. A new covered lunch area would be constructed behind the small, rectory facing Bean Avenue. The playfield would remain unchanged, but the kindergarten and I" grade play area (located behind the elementary school building) would be updated. School Traffic Noise Increases. Since the school is already operating with the proposed enrollment level of 315 students, traffic- related noise increases associated with the proposed increase in enrollment is already reflected in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity and along access roads. However, to determine the project's incremental noise increase, traffic noise level changes attributable to project - related traffic increases were calculated. Traffic increases on streets that provide access to the school (Bean Avenue, Tait Avenue, Lyndon Avenue, and West Main Street) would result in noise increases that are well below 1 dB, a less- than - significant increase based on the above applicable noise guidelines and standards (see Attachment 5 of the Initial Study, Section VI.A, Traffic Noise, for more detailed discussion). On Campus Operational Changes. Noise levels from proposed changes in lunch area location and design as well as increased number of students on the playground and playfield would increase noise exposure at the adjacent residential receptors. Project- related increases in noise generated on the playfield would result in short-term noise increases of less than 1 dB over existing noise levels at the residence at 30 Tait Avenue. Such increases would comply with standards of the Los Gatos Noise Ordinance. Proposed changes in school operations would result in a 1 dB DNL increase to the existing noise environment at the closest residences (100 Wilder Avenue and 30 Tait Avenue). Since noise levels are below the Los Gatos General Plan Noise Element's 55 dB DNL limit at the closest home at 100 Wilder Avenue, this 1 dB noise increase would be less than significant. However, since the existing noise exposure at the 30 Tait Avenue residence was determined to be at the 55 dB DNL limit, the project's 1 dB increase would cause ambient noise levels to exceed this limit. Therefore, project - related noise increases at this residence would be significant. It should be noted that existing sideyard fencing at this residence is a chainlink fence (not a FEBRUARY 2013 20 INITIAL STUDY — 219 BEAN AVENUE solid fence). With implementation of Mitigation Measure NOI -1, Noise Control Barrier, ambient noise levels at the residence at 30 Tait Avenue would be reduced to less- than - significant level (below the 55 dB DNL limit). Short -Term Noise Increases. Short-term noise increases would occur during demolition of the existing structures on the site and construction of new project buildings and remodeling of existing facilities. Demolition and construction equipment are typically similar, with the exception of paving equipment. Thus, the noise levels generated by these two phases would be similar over the course of the entire construction process. Demolition /construction equipment noise levels range from 68 to 100 dBA at 50 feet from the source, and would have the potential to disturb residences across Bean Avenue and along Tait Avenue. The proposed demolition of the building along Bean Avenue (Cougar's Corner) and the subsequent construction of the church - related residence would generate construction noise levels similar to those associated with typical single - family residential construction. The proposed demolition of the existing classroom building and construction of the new junior high building would occur farther from existing residential areas. The closest affected uses to this new building would be the rear facades of the commercial buildings across Victory Lane, which are mostly solid with some man -doors used for deliveries. Given these conditions and the temporary nature of construction noise, short-term construction - related noise increases are considered to be less than significant. However, given the proximity of residential uses and school use on -site, noise control measures are recommended to help reduce any potential noise impacts. Airport - Related Issues. The project site is not located within an airport land use plan. There is no public airport, public use airport, or private airstrip located within the Town's boundaries or within two miles of the project site. For air travel, the closest international airports are San Jose International Airport (SIC), San Francisco International Airport (SFO), and Oakland International Airport. The proposed project would not expose people residing or working in the area to excessive airport- related noise levels. Therefore, there would be no impact. Mitigation Measures — Noise (NOI). The following measures are either required to reduce project- related noise impacts to a less- than - significant level or recommended for consideration: N0I -1: Noise Control Barrier. To reduce excess noise from playfield activity at the residence at 30 Tait Avenue, the project applicant will construct a six -foot high solid board fence along the property line between the playfield and the home at 30 Tait Avenue. The barrier height is in reference to the nearest playfield ground elevation. Figure 3 of Attachment 5 of the Initial Study delineates the location of the noise control barrier. The fence will be constructed of minimum 1 -inch thick (nom.) redwood boards nailed tight such that no gaps are visible. Cracks, gaps, knotholes are not permitted. No openings are permitted between the upper fencing components and the ground. NOI -2: Recommended Construction Measures. Although there would be no significant noise impact under CEQA or construction- related noise mitigation required under CEQA, project - related demolition and construction noise at the site could be reduced by using quiet or "new technology" equipment. The greatest potential for noise abatement of current equipment should be the quieting of exhaust noiseby use of improved mufflers. It is recommended that all internal combustion engines used at the project site be equipped with a type of muffler recommended by the vehicle manufacturer. In addition, all equipment should be in good mechanical condition so as to minimize noise created by faulty or poorly maintained engine, drive -train and other components. Demolition and construction noise could also be mitigated by the following: ■ Schedule construction operations that comply with the limits of the Town of Los Gatos Noise Ordinance. FEBRUARY 2013 21 INITIAL STUDY — 219 BEAN AVENUE • Limit the use of equipment close to sensitive receptor properties. • Utilizing temporary berms or noise barriers, such as lumber or other material stockpiles and the construction trailers or other non -noisy long -term structures. • Place long -term stationary equipment as far away from the residential areas as possible. • Keep mobile equipment (haul trucks, concrete trucks, etc.) off of local streets as much as possible. A noise reduction benefit can also be achieved by appropriate selection of equipment utilized for various operations, subject to equipment availability and cost considerations, the following recommendations for minimizing impacts on the surrounding area are offered: • Earth Removal: Use scrapers as much as possible for earth removal, rather than the noisier loaders and hauling trucks. • Ground Preparation: Use a motor grader rather than a bulldozer for final grading. • Building Construction: Power saws should be shielded or enclosed where practical to decrease noise emissions. Nail guns should be used where possible as they are less noisy than manual hammering. • Generators and Compressors: Use generators and compressors that are housed in acoustical enclosures rather than weather enclosures or none at all. 13. Population and Housing There would be no population growth associated with the school use or resulting from proposed changes to the school's CUP. Therefore, the project would not be considered growth- inducing, particularly since the proposed changes to the CUP would limit enrollment levels to current levels. Conditions limiting the enrollment to current levels would be included as part of the Planned Development Ordinance. No housing or residents would be displaced as a result of project implementation. 14. Public Services Services are currently provided to the existing school facility. The Los Gatos/Monte Sereno Police Department and the Santa Clara County Fire Department provide emergency and public safety services to the school and would continue to do so after project implementation. The project would not increase demand for public services since services are already provided to the site and the project would not involve an increase over existing and proposed student enrollment of 315 students, and staffing levels of 37.5 FTE. Consequently, the proposed project would have a less than significant impact on public services. 15. Recreational Facilities The proposed modifications to the CUP would not affect the use of existing parks or recreational facilities. There would be no population growth associated with the school use or resulting from proposed changes to the school's CUP. Therefore, the project would not increase demand for recreational facilities. The school already has recreational facilities for the student population. The project proposes the relocation of an existing play /parking area to an adjoining area immediately north of the existing play /parking area. The proposed location of the replacement play area is presently occupied by the 59 Victory Lane building proposed for demolition. Upon removal of this building, the play /parking area would be constructed on the former building site, thereby providing a replacement play area for students. FEBRUARY 2013 22 INITIAL STUDY — 219 BEAN AVENUE As a result, no expansion of any recreational facilities would be required. The relocation of the play /parking area would be a less than significant impact of the project on recreational facilities and uses. The Town's Traffic Impact Policy (Resolution 1991 -174) requires preparation of a detailed traffic study for any project with the potential to generate 20 or more additional AM or PM peak hour trips. A detailed traffic impact analysis (TIA) was completed by the Town's consulting traffic engineer, TJKM Transportation Consultants, in July 2012 and this report is included as Attachment 6 of the Initial Study. 16. Transportation/Traffic Significance Criteria. The Town's level of service (LOS) standard is LOS D. Intersections operating worse than LOS D are considered impacted and should be considered for mitigation. Also, the proposed project is considered to have a significant impact if it causes the levels of service for the study intersections to drop more than one level if it is at LOS A, B, or C, and drop any further if it is at D or worse. Project Trip Generation. St. Mary's School is currently operating with an enrollment of 315 students, which is 50 more students than is allowed under the existing conditional use permit and corresponds to the proposed level of enrollment. Therefore, TJKM analyzed study intersections that already include additional traffic from the proposed increase in enrollment. The proposed enrollment increase by 50 students is estimated to have added 45 trips (25 inbound and 20 outbound trips) during the a.m. peak hour and 30 trips (14 inbound and 16 outbound) during the school p.m. peak hour (between 2:30 p.m. and 3:30 p.m.) to the Los Gatos street system. Intersection Level of Service Operation. Peak -hour turning movement counts at the study intersections were conducted on a typical weekday during the first half of May 2012, when St. Mary's School was in regular session. Figure 3 of Attachment 6 of the Initial Study illustrates the existing lane configuration and the peak hour turning movement volumes at the study intersections. The raw traffic counts are provided in Appendix B of the TIA. The detailed LOS calculations (TRAFFIX Output) are contained in Appendix C of the TIA. The appendices are available for review at the Los Gatos Community Development Department (located at 110 East Main Street during counter hours from 8:00 a.m. to 1:00 p.m., Monday through Friday). TJKM evaluated the project's impact at the following five intersections: (1) Los Gatos Saratoga Road (State Route 9)/Massol Avenue, (2) Los Gatos Saratoga Road (State Route 9)/N. Santa Cruz Avenue, (3) Main Street/Lyndon Avenue, (4) Main Street /N. Santa Cruz Avenue, and (5) Bean Avenue /Tait Avenue. The level of service analysis results are summarized in Table 5 of the Initial Study for the following three scenarios: (1) Existing plus Project, (2) Existing plus Project plus Approved Projects (Background Plus Project Conditions), and (3) Existing plus Approved Projects plus Pending Projects (Cumulative Conditions). Existing Plus Project Conditions. Under Existing Conditions, all study intersections operate at acceptable levels of service during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours (LOS D or better) except for the Los Gatos Saratoga Road (State Route 9) /Massol Avenue intersection. The northbound left -turn movement of Massol Avenue at Los Gatos Saratoga Road operates at LOS F during both the a.m. and the school p.m. peak hours. This intersection is controlled with a one -way stop for the northbound left -turn movement on Massol Avenue. The northbound right -turn movement from Massol Avenue is uncontrolled and is provided with a dedicated travel lane on Los Gatos Saratoga Road for vehicles to turn into. The left -turn volumes from Massol Avenue are 26 and 28 vehicles per hour during existing a.m. and school p.m. peak hours, respectively. The peak -hour 95th- percentile queue for this movement is approximately 75 feet (three vehicle lengths) during both peak hours, which is consistent with the field observations. The low volumes of the northbound left -turn movement do not meet any of the signal FEBRUARY 2013 23 INITIAL STUDY — 219 BEAN AVENUE warrant criteria. Based on field observations and accident analysis, the signalization of this intersection does not appear to be necessary and therefore, the project's impact on operation of this intersection would be less than significant. It should be noted that the results of the level -of- service calculations are the same with and without the additional trips from the proposed project. Therefore, the project's impact on the northbound left -turn movement would be less than significant. TJKM recommends that the Town staff monitor the intersection operation to evaluate whether a new traffic signal or other improvements may need to be considered in the future. Existing Plus lus Project Plus Approved Projects (Background Plus Project) Conditions. TJKM identifies 17 approved projects that are estimated to contribute a net total of 855 vehicular trips to the town's street network during the a.m. peak hour and 766 trips during the school p.m. peak hour. With these approved projects, the increase in average delay at study intersections is limited (less than three seconds of average delay). All study intersections would continue to operate acceptably (LOS D or better) except for the Los Gatos Saratoga Road/Massol Avenue intersection. The northbound left -turn at this intersection is expected to continue to operate at LOS F during both the peak hours. The northbound left -turn volumes from Massol Avenue to Los Gatos Saratoga Road are expected to remain approximately the same as existing volumes, 26 and 28 vehicles per hour during a.m. and school p.m. peak hours, respectively. The low volumes of the left -turn movement do not meet any of the signal warrant criteria, and no significant changes in traffic conditions are expected at this northbound left -turn movement in the near future. However, TJKM recommends that Town staff monitor the intersection operation to evaluate whether any improvements are required in future years. Background Plus Project Plus Pending Projects (Cumulative) Conditions. TJKM identifies nine pending projects that could contribute a net total of 1,942 vehicular trips to the town's street network during the a.m. peak hour and 2,265 trips during the school p.m. peak hour. When traffic from pending projects are added (Cumulative Conditions), all study intersections are expected to continue to operate acceptably (LOS D or better) except for the Los Gatos Saratoga Road/Massol Avenue intersection. The northbound left -turn at this intersection is expected to continue to operate at LOS F during both the peak hours. The northbound left -turn volumes from Massol Avenue to Los Gatos Saratoga Road are expected to remain approximately the same as existing volumes, 26 and 28 vehicles per hour during a.m. and school p.m. peak hours, respectively. The low volumes of the left -turn movement do not meet any of the signal warrant criteria. Although this movement currently operates at LOS F but does not meet signal warrant criteria and would continue to operate at this level with the proposed project, the project's contribution to cumulative impacts on intersection operations would not be cumulatively considerable, and therefore, less than significant. No significant changes in traffic conditions at this northbound left -turn movement are expected in the near future. However, TJKM recommends that Town staff monitor the intersection operation to evaluate whether any improvements are required in future years. Air Traffic Patterns. The project site is not located within an airport land use plan, nor is there a public airport, public use airport, or private airstrip located in the project vicinity. Therefore, the project would have no impact on air traffic patterns, would not directly increase air traffic levels, nor would there be any change in location that results in substantial safety risks. Traffic Safety Hazards. TJKM reviewed the SWITRS (Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System) collision reports for the school traffic routes within the project vicinity. Based on the 2009 Collision Data on California State Highways publication, the average statewide collision rate for a four- legged suburban signalized intersection is 0.55 collisions per million vehicles (PMV). Similarly, the statewide average collision rate at multi- legged unsignalized intersection is 0.30 collisions PMV. Town staff provided the collision reports for streets in the project vicinity for the two -year period of April 1, 2009 through March 31, 2011, and they are summarized as follows: FEBRUARY 2013 24 INITIAL STUDY — 219 BEAN AVENUE ■ One collision was reported at the Los Gatos Saratoga Road /Massol Avenue intersection. Based on the existing peak hour turning movement counts, the number of vehicles entering this intersection is estimated to be 8.04 million vehicles during the aforementioned two -year time period. The collision rate for an intersection is defined as the number of collisions per million vehicles entering the intersection. The collision rate at the Los Gatos Saratoga Road/Massol Avenue intersection is calculated to be 0.12 (= 1/8.04) collisions per million vehicles. Thus, the estimated collision rate at this intersection is well below the statewide average rate of 0.30 collisions PMV. ■ The number of vehicles entering the Los Gatos Saratoga Road/N. Santa Cruz Avenue intersection is 12.44 million vehicles. Collision reports for this intersection obtained from the Town staff for the last two years indicate that there were three collisions. The collision rate at this intersection is estimated at 0.24 (= 3/12.44) collisions PMV, which is well below the statewide average rate of 0.55 collisions PMV. • The number of vehicles entering the intersection of Main Street/N. Santa Cruz Avenue is 5.35 million vehicles. Collision reports for this intersection indicate that there were two collisions. The collision rate at this intersection is 0.38 (= 2/5.35) collisions PMV. Thus, the collision rate at this intersection is well below the statewide average rate of 0.55 collisions PMV. • No collisions were reported for the last two years (April 1, 2009 — March 31, 2011) at the intersections of Main Street/Lyndon Avenue and Tait Avenue /Bean Avenue. Given the proposed project's relatively small trip generation numbers, the proposed project is expected to have little or no impact on the collision rate (or safety) at the study intersections. School Pick -up and Drop -off Observations. During the a.m. peak period between 7:30 a.m. and 8:30 a.m., the school -bound vehicles (driven by the parents of students) drop off students at the designated drop -off location along the cul -de -sac curbside on Lyndon Avenue and the curbside drop -off zone near an entrance of the school on Bean Avenue. The drop -off zone on Bean Avenue can accommodate approximately five vehicles at the curbside. Similarly, the drop -off zone along the cul -de -sac curbside on Lyndon Avenue can accommodate as many as nine vehicles. It takes approximately 20 to 25 seconds for a vehicle to drop off a student at the designated drop -off area. During the peak hour conditions, student drop -offs at the zone on Lyndon Avenue are assisted by the school staff to facilitate the process. During the school p.m. peak period between 2:30 p.m. and 3:30 p.m., the parent vehicles begin to arrive at the pick -up zone (which is same as the drop -off zone) and also stack along vacant curb parking spaces. It was noted that parent arrivals were spread over a longer time and the stacking conditions were relatively shorter compared to the a.m. peak drop -off activity. Based on the a.m. and the school p.m. peak hour observations by TJKM staff, no particular queuing issues were observed at the drop- off /pickup zones. Emergency Access. Emergency access to the site is currently provided from four adjacent streets: Bean Avenue, Tait Avenue, Victory Lane, and Lyndon Avenue. The access from Victory Lane is gated and available to emergency vehicles only. There is currently adequate emergency access and these accesses would remain unchanged with the proposed project. Conflicts with Alternative Transportation (Pedestrian, Bicycle, and Transit Access). There are existing sidewalks along streets providing access to the school from surrounding areas. There are paved, Class III bike lanes proposed in the 2020 General Plan on West Main Street, and they extend both west and east of the school. Bus Route 48 operates in the project area. The closest bus stop is located on West Main Street near North Santa Cruz Avenue. There are sidewalks along streets providing access between the school and this bus FEBRUARY 2013 25 INITIAL STUDY — 219 BEAN AVENUE stop. Given the small increase in the number of students at this school, this project is not expected to cause any significant impact on transit service. 17. Utilities and Service Systems Utilities are currently provided to the existing buildings located on the project site, and no major off -site utility improvements are expected to be required for proposed improvements. Since this site is currently developed and utilities are extended to the project vicinity, no major off -site utility improvements are expected to be required. 18. Mandatory Findings of Significance Significant Impacts on the Natural and Man -Made Environments. This Initial Study indicates the proposed project would have a less -than- significant effect on the natural and man -made environment except for the following: • Air Quality: Although the project's construction- related and operational air pollutant emissions would not exceed the significance thresholds for criteria pollutants, the BAAQMD recommends the all Basic Construction Mitigation Measures be implemented for all construction projects, whether or not construction- related emissions exceed significance thresholds. Therefore, the project's construction- related and operational increases in criteria pollutant emissions would be less than significant with implementation of Mitigation Measure AQ -1. • Biological Resources: Project implementation would adversely affect three existing ordinance - size trees and could affect three additional ordinance -size trees. • Cultural Resources: Since almost the entire site is covered with buildings or pavement, a visual inspection of the site was not possible, but the potential' for discovery of obscured cultural resources during future development of the project site would still remain. • Hazards: Proposed demolition could result in airborne release of hazardous building materials, such as asbestos fibers or lead dust. ■ Noise: Noise levels at the 30 Tait Avenue residence are currently at the 55 dB DNL limit, and the project's 1 dBIincrease would cause ambient noise levels to exceed this limit. Therefore, project- related noise increases at this residence would be significant. The above - listed mitigation measures will be required to reduce these impacts to a less- than - significant level. Cumulative Impacts. When the proposed project is considered together with other recently constructed, approved, or proposed projects in the vicinity, the proposed project could contribute to cumulative impacts, particularly those related to traffic increases and associated air quality and noise impacts. Approved projects that are located within the project area or would have some influence on the project area such as traffic, and within the Town of Los Gatos that have been approved but not yet constructed or constructed but not yet fully occupied are listed as follows: 1. 15940 Blossom Hill Road (residential) 2. 15881 Linda Avenue (residential) 3. 371 Los Gatos Boulevard (residential) 4. 55 Los Gatos Saratoga (retail /office) 5. 15720 Winchester Boulevard (office development replaces a single - family home) 6. 14881 National Avenue (medical office development replaces a single - family home) 7. 15400 Los Gatos Boulevard (office /retail) 8. 16005 Los Gatos Boulevard (mixed -use) FEBRUARY 2013 26 INITIAL STUDY — 219 BEAN AVENUE 9. 950 University Avenue (self - storage) 10. 15928 Union Avenue (residential) 11. Samaritan Way (medical office) 12. Town Library (new library replaces the existing library) 13. 55 Placer Oaks (single - family housing) 14. 16213 Los Gatos Boulevard (residential replacing auto dealership) 15. 800 Blossom Hill Road (senior adult residential) 16. Albright Way Development (office and residential) 17. 930 University Avenue (soccer complex) 18. 106 Town Terrace (single family residential) The following projects are foreseeable developments that have not been approved, and are likely to add traffic to study intersections: 1. North Forty Specific Plan (mixed -use) 2. 15500 Los Gatos Boulevard (redevelopment assumptions for Moore Buick GMC dealership) 3. 620 Blossom Hill Road (redevelopment assumptions for Bentley Silicon Valley dealership) 4. 20 Dittos Lane Apartments (residential) 5. Twin Oaks (single - family residential) 6. 16212 Los Gatos Boulevard (residential replaces auto dealership) 7. 339 -341 Bella Vista (single- family residential) 8. 135 Riviera Drive (residential apartments expansion) 9. 15600 Los Gatos Boulevard (pharmacy /commercial development) 10. 640 Blossom Hill Road (restaurant) The geographic scope of the cumulative analysis varies by resource area. The proposed project would contribute to cumulative traffic impacts as well as other traffic- related air quality, greenhouse gas, and noise impacts. The geographic scope of the cumulative air quality analysis is regional (San Francisco Bay Area Air Basin), while the geographic scope of the greenhouse gas analysis is global. The cumulative noise impact analysis is more localized and limited to sensitive receptors located in the vicinity of the project site. The geographic scope of cumulative hydrologic and water quality impacts is San Francisco Bay region. For the evaluation of cumulative impacts on public services and utilities, the geographic scopes vary with each service agency's service boundary, which is the town boundary in some cases. With implementation of mitigation measures specified above, the project's contribution to cumulative air quality and traffic impacts would be less than cumulatively considerable and therefore, less than significant. Copies of the Initial Study used to make the above recommendation are on file and available for public inspection during regular business hours at the Town Community Development Department, 210 East Main Street, Los Gatos, California. 2, Rb 'f1' Date Too Capurso, Acting 're for ot9bmmunity Development FEBRUARY 2013 27 This Page Intentionally Left Flank 0 jo CP "qk'q7- A A� w .......... /CT .. .... ..... I r-'XI-Imma, 2 This Page Intentionally Left Blank PLANNING COMMISSION —March 13, 2013 REQUIRED FINDINGS FOR: 219 Bean Avenue Planned Development Application PD -11 -006 Negative Declaration ND -11 -008 Architecture and Site Application 5 -12 -098 Requesting approval for rezoning from R -11) & C -2 to R -1D:PD to allow for the construction of a new Jr. High School, modify existing school operations, and continue church services and activities. No significant environmental impacts have been identified as a result of this and a Mitigated Negative Declaration is recommended. APNs 510 -44- 083, 510 -44 -084, & 510 -44 -028. PROPERTY OWNER: Roman Catholic Bishop of San Jose APPLICANT: Jeffrey T. Berg, AIA/Steinberg Architects FINDINGS: Required finding for CEQA: ® No significant impacts have been identified and a Mitigated Negative Declaration is recommended for the proposed project. Required consistency with the Town's General Plan: ® That the proposed Zone Change is consistent with the General Plan and its Elements in that the Planned Development overlay allows school and church uses that are consistent with the property's zoning district. Required finding for the Redevelopment Plan for the Central Los Gatos Redevelopment Project Area: ® That the proposed project is consistent with the Redevelopment Plan for the Central Los Gatos Redevelopment Project Area (Section IV.B) in that the Redevelopment Plan permits the maintenance and enlargement of educational and religious institutions. As required by the Town's Traffic Impact Policy: a Projects that generate additional traffic of five or more peak hour trips may only be recommended for approval if the project's benefits to the community override the traffic impacts as determined by specific sections of the General Plan and /or any Specific Plan. If a project generates additional traffic of five or more peak hour trips the burden is on the applicant to cite economic or housing benefits to the Town and /or specific sections of the General Plan and any applicable Specific Plan that demonstrate the project's benefit to the Community which outweighs the traffic impact. The deciding body must make specific findings which demonstrate that the benefit(s) of the project outweigh the impact in order to approve the project. LANIBIOT The benefits of the project to the Town outweigh the impact of increased traffic in that the applicant has offered the following Community Benefit: the activities of St. Mary's church and school, including but not limited to religious programs and services, community meeting space, the Country Fair, and nonprofit organization events. CONSIDERATIONS Required considerations in review of Architecture & Site applications: w As required by Section 29.20.150 of the Town Code, the considerations in review of an Architecture and Site application were all made in reviewing this project. N :ODE W'INDINGS\2017\BEAN219.DOCX CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL —March 13, 2013 For the Architecture and Site Application 219 Bean Avenue Negative Declaration ND -11 -008 Architecture and Site Application S -12 -098 Requesting approval to allow for the construction of a new Jr. High School. If no significant environmental impacts are identified as a result of this project, a Mitigated Negative Declaration will be prepared. APNs 510 -44 -083, 510 -44 -084, & 510 -44 -028. PROPERTY OWNER: Roman Catholic Bishop of San Jose APPLICANT: Jeffrey T. Berg, AIA/Steinberg Architects TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT: Planning Division 1. APPROVAL: This application shall be completed in accordance with all of the conditions of approval listed below and applicable performance standards in the Planned Development, and in substantial compliance with the plans approved and noted as received by the Town on January 15, 2013. Any changes or modifications to the approved plans shall be approved by the Community Development Director, the Development Review Committee, the Planning Commission, or Town Council, depending on the scope of the changes. 2. PLANNED DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL: This approval is contingent upon the adoption of Planned Development Application PDA 1 -006. This Architecture and Site application cannot obtain permits for any work related to this application until the Planned Development Ordinance is effective. 3. OUTDOOR LIGHTING: Exterior lighting shall be kept to a minimum, and shall be down directed fixtures that will not reflect or encroach onto adjacent properties. No flood lights shall be used unless it can be demonstrated that they are needed for safety or security. The lighting plan shall be reviewed during building plan check. 4. GENERAL: All existing trees shown on the plan and trees required to remain or to be planted are specific subjects of approval of this plan, and must remain on the site. 5. TREE REMOVAL PERMIT: A Tree Removal Permit shall be obtained for any trees to be removed, prior to the issuance of a building or grading permit. 6. TREE FENCING: Protective tree fencing shall be placed at the drip line of existing trees prior to issuance of demolition and building permits and shall remain through all phases of construction. Include a tree protection fencing plan with the construction plans. 7. ARBORIST RECOMMENDATIONS: All recommendations made by the Town's Consulting Arborist, Deborah Ellis, shall be implemented to eliminate or minimize construction- related impacts on the trees to be retained. Recommendations are listed in the May 1, 2012, October 17, 2012, and January 10, 2013, arborist's reports. The report also provides recommendations for Protection Measures before and during development, encompassing fencing, removal of hardscape, demolition, work within tree canopies, etc. Tree protection specifications shall be printed on the construction plans. A Compliance Memorandum shall be prepared by the applicant and submitted with the building permit application detailing how the recommendations have or will be addressed. These recommendations must be incorporated in the building permit plans, and completed prior to issuance of a building permit where applicable. Emim 4 8. RECYCLING: All wood, metal, glass and aluminum materials generated from the demolished structure shall be deposited to a company which will recycle the materials. Receipts from the company(s) accepting these materials, noting type and weight of material, shall be submitted to the Town prior to the Towns demolition inspection. 9. LANDSCAPE WATER EFFICIENCY: This project is subject to the Town's Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance, Chapter 26, Article IV of the Town Code or the State Water Efficiency Ordinance, whichever is more restrictive. A fee as established by Town Council resolution shall be paid when the landscape, irrigation plans, and water calculations are submitted for review prior to the issuance of building permit. 10. TOWN INDEMNITY: Applicants are notified that Town Code Section 1.10.115 requires that any applicant who receives a permit or entitlement from the Town shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the Town and its officials in any action brought by a third party to overturn, set aside, or void the permit or entitlement. This requirement is a condition of approval of all such permits and entitlements whether or not expressly set forth in the approval, and may be secured to the satisfaction of the Town Attorney. Building Division 11. PERMITS REQUIRED: A building permit shall be required for the construction of the new Jr. High School building and a separate building permit to modify the existing Grammar School building. Separate permits are required for electrical, mechanical, and plumbing work as necessary. 12. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: The Conditions of Approval must be blue -lined in full on the cover sheet of the construction plans. A Compliance Memorandum shall be prepared and submitted with the building permit application detailing how the Conditions of Approval will be addressed. 13. SIZE OF PLANS: Four sets of construction plans, maximum size 24" x 36." 14, SOILS REPORT: A soils report, prepared to the satisfaction of the Building Official, containing foundation and retaining wall design recommendations is required to be submitted with the building permit application. This report shall be prepared by a licensed civil engineer specializing in soils mechanics. 15. FOUNDATION INSPECTIONS: A pad certificate prepared by a licensed civil engineer or land surveyor shall be submitted to the project building inspector at foundation inspection. This certificate shall certify compliance with the recommendations as specified in the soils report and that the building pad elevation, on -site retaining wall locations and elevations have been prepared according to approved plans. Horizontal and vertical controls shall be set and certified by a licensed surveyor or registered civil engineer for the following items: a. Building pad elevation b. Finish floor elevation c. Foundation corner locations d. Retaining Walls 16. BACKWATER VALVE: The scope of this project may require the installation of a sanitary sewer backwater valve per Town Ordinance 6.50.025. Please provide information on the plans if a backwater valve is required and the location of the installation. The Town of Los Gatos Ordinance and West Valley Sanitation District (WVSD) requires backwater valves on drainage piping serving fixtures that have flood level rims less than 12- inches above the elevation of the next upstream manhole. 17. TITLE 24 — COMMERCIAL: The buildings shall comply with the latest California Title 24 Accessibility Standards. Necessary work shall be first investigated by the design Architect, and then confirmed by Town staff. 18. SPECIAL INSPECTIONS: When a special inspection is required by CBC Section 1704, the Architect or Engineer of record shall prepare an inspection program that shall be submitted to the Building Official for approval prior to issuance of the building permit. The Town Special Inspection form must be completely filled -out, signed by all requested parties, and be blue - lined on the construction plans. Special Inspection forms are available from the Building Division Service Counter or online at www.losgatosca.gov /building 19. NONPOINT SOURCE POLLUTION STANDARDS SHEET: The Town standard Santa Clara County Valley Nonpoint Source Pollution Control Program Sheet (or Clean Bay Sheet 2406) shall be part of the plan submittal as the second page. The specification sheet is available at the Building Division Service Counter for a fee of $2 or at ARC (formerly known as San Jose Blue Print) for a fee. 20. NPDES -C.3 DATA FORM: A copy of the NPDES C.3 Data Form (updated based on the final construction drawings) must be blue -lined in full on the plans. In the event that this data differs significantly from any Planning approvals, the Town may require recertification of the project's storm water treatment facilities prior to release of the Building Permit. 21. PLANS: The construction plans shall be prepared under the direct supervision of a licensed Architect or Engineer. (Business and Professionals Code Section 5538) 22. APPROVALS REQUIRED: The project requires the following departments and agencies approval before issuing a building permit: a. Community Development - Planning Division: Jennifer Savage (408) 399 -5702 b. Engineering /Parks & Public Works Department: Maziar Bozorginia (408) 395 -3460 c. Santa Clara County Fire Department: (408) 378 -4010 d. West Valley Sanitation District: (408) 378 -2407 e. Local School District: The Town will forward the paperwork to the appropriate school district(s) for processing. A copy of the paid receipt is required prior to permit issuance. 23. *AIR QUALITY MITIGATION MEASURE -1: Basic construction measures. To limit the project's construction- related dust and criteria pollutant emissions, the following BAAQMD- recommended Basic Construction Mitigation Measures shall be included in the project's grading plan, building plans, and contract specifications: a. All exposed surfaces (e.g., parking areas, staging areas, soil piles, graded areas, and unpaved access roads) shall be watered two times per day. b. All haul trucks transporting soil, sand, or other loose material off -site shall be covered. c. All visible mud or dirt track -out onto adjacent public roads shall be removed using wet power vacuum street sweepers at least once per day. The use of dry power sweeping is prohibited. d. All vehicle speeds on unpaved roads shall be limited to 15 mph. e. All roadways, driveways, and sidewalks to be paved shall be completed as soon as possible. f. Idling times shall be minimized either by shutting equipment off when not in use or reducing the maximum idling time to five minutes (as required by the California airborne toxics control measure Title 13, Section 2485 of California Code of Regulations [CCR]). Clear signage shall be provided for construction workers at all access points. g. All construction equipment shall be maintained and properly tuned in accordance with manufacturer's specifications. All equipment shall be checked by a certified mechanic and determined to be running in proper condition prior to operation. h. Post a publicly visible sign with the telephone number and person to contact at the Town regarding dust complaints. This person shall respond and take corrective action within 48 hours. The BAAQMD's phone number shall also be visible to ensure compliance with applicable regulations. 24. *CULTURAL RESOURCES MITIGATION MEASURE -1: Alert Construction Personnel. Construction personnel involved with eaithmoving shall be alerted to the potential for the discovery of prehistoric materials and in particular, concentrations of historic artifacts. Prehistoric archaeological resources could include but not be limited to the following: darker than surrounding soils of a friable nature, concentrations of stone, bone or fresh water shellfish, artifacts of these materials, and evidence of fire (ash, charcoal, fire altered earth or rock) and of course, burials, both human and animal. 25. *CULTURAL RESOURCES MITIGATION MEASURE -2: Halt of Construction If Archaeological Traces Are Encountered. In the event that archaeological traces are encountered, all construction within a 20 -foot radius of the find shall be halted, the Community Development Director shall be notified, and an archaeologist shall be retained to examine the find and make appropriate recommendations. 26. *CULTURAL RESOURCES MITIGATION MEASURE -3: Plan for Eligible Resources. In the event that it appears further earthmoving will affect a resource eligible for the California Register of Historic Resource (CRHR), a plan for evaluation of the resource through limited hand excavation should be submitted to the Town's Community Development Department for approval. If evaluative testing demonstrates that the project will affect a CRHR eligible resource, a plan for the mitigation of impacts to the resource should be submitted to the Community Development Department for approval before construction is allowed inside the zone designated as archaeologically sensitive. 27. *CULTURAL RESOURCES MITIGATION MEASURE -4: Preliminary Archaeological Report. If the Community Development Director finds that the archaeological find is not a significant resource, work will resume only after the submittal of a preliminary archaeological report and after provisions for reburial and ongoing monitoring are accepted. Provisions for identifying descendants of a deceased Native American and for reburial will follow the protocol set forth in CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5(e). If the site is found to be a significant archaeological site, a mitigation program will be prepared and submitted to the Community Development Director for consideration and approval, in conformance with the protocol set forth in Public Resources Code Section 21083.2. 28. *CULTURAL RESOURCES MITIGATION MEASURE -5: Final Archaeological Report. A final report shall be prepared when a find is determined to be a significant archaeological site, and /or when Native American remains are found on the site. The final report will include background information on the completed work, a description and list of identified resources, the disposition and curation of these resources, any testing, other recovered information, and conclusions. 29. *HAZARDS MITIGATION MEASURE -1: Abatement of Lead -Based Paints. Prior to proposed building demolition, construction finish materials that are suspect for containing lead -based paint will be tested, and pending laboratory analysis, will not be subjected to any process which renders them friable unless proper engineering controls and worker protection procedures are initiated. 30. *NOISE MITIGATION MEASURE -1: Noise Barrier. To reduce excess noise from the playfield activity at the residence at 30 Tait Avenue, the project applicant will construct a six -foot high solid board fence along the property line between the playfield and the home at 30 Tait Avenue. The barrier height is in reference to the nearest playfield ground elevation. Figure 3 of Attached 5 of the Initial Study delineates the location of the noise control barrier. The fence will be constructed of minimum 1 -inch thick (nom.) redwood boards nailed tight such that no gaps are visible. Cracks, gaps, knotholes are no permitted. No openings are permitted between the upper fence components and the ground. 31. *NOISE MITIGATION MEASURE -2: Recommended Construction Measures. Although there would be no significant noise impact under CEQA or construction - related noise mitigation required under CEQA, project - related demolition and construction noise at the site could be reduced by using quiet or "new technology" equipment. The greatest potential for noise abatement of current equipment should be the quieting of exhaust noise by use of improved mufflers. It is recommended that all internal combustion engines used at the project site be equipped with a type of muffler recommended by the vehicle manufacturer. In addition, all equipment should be in good mechanical condition so as to minimize noise created by faulty or poorly maintained engine, drive -train and other components. Demolition and construction noise could also be mitigated by the following: a. Schedule construction operations that comply with the limits of the Town of Los Gatos Noise Ordinance. b. Limit the use of equipment close to sensitive receptor properties. c. Utilizing temporary berms or noise barriers, such as lumber or other material stockpiles and the construction trailers or other non -noisy long -term structures. d. Place long -term stationary equipment as far away from the residential areas as possible. e. Keep mobile equipment (haul trucks, concrete trucks, etc.) off of local streets as much as possible. f. A noise reduction benefit can also be achieved by appropriate selection of equipment utilized for various operations, subject to equipment availability and cost considerations, the following recommendations for minimizing impacts on the surrounding area are offered: i. Earth Removal: Use scrapers as much as possible for earth removal, rather than the noisier loaders and hauling trucks. ii. Ground Preparation: Use a motor grader rather than a bulldozer for final grading. iii. Building Construction: Power saws should be shielded or enclosed where practical to decrease noise emissions. Nail guns should be used where possible as they are less noisy than manual hammering. iv. Generators and Compressors: Use generators and compressors that are housed in acoustical enclosures rather than weather enclosures or none at all. TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE DIRECTOR OF PARKS AND PUBLIC WORKS: Engineering Division 32. GENERAL: All public improvements shall be made according to the latest adopted Town Standard Drawings and the Town Standard Specifications. All work shall conform to the applicable Town ordinances. The adjacent public right -of -way shall be kept clear of all job related dirt and debris at the end of the day. Dirt and debris shall not be washed into storm drainage facilities. The storing of goods and materials on the sidewalk and /or the street will not be allowed unless a special permit is issued. The developer's representative in charge shall be at the job site during all working hours. Failure to maintain the public right -of -way according to this condition may result in the Town performing the required maintenance at the developer's expense. 33, ENCROACHMENT PERMIT: All work in the public right -of -way will require a Construction Encroachment Permit. All work over $5,000 will require construction security. It is the responsibility of the applicant /developer to obtain any necessary encroachment permits from affected agencies and private parties, including but not limited to, Pacific Gas and Electric (PG &E), SBC, Comcast, Santa Clara Valley Water District, California Department of Transportation. Copies of any approvals or permits must be submitted to the Town Engineering Department prior to releasing of any permit. 34, PUBLIC WORKS INSPECTIONS: The developer or his representative shall notify the Engineering Inspector at least twenty -four (24) hours before starting any work pertaining to on -site drainage facilities, grading or paving, and all work in the Town's right -of -way. Failure to do so will result in rejection of work that went on without inspection. 35. RESTORATION OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS: The developer shall repair or replace all existing improvements not designated for removal that are damaged or removed because of developer's operations. Improvements such as, but not limited to: curbs, gutters, sidewalks, driveways, signs, pavements, raised pavement markers, thermoplastic pavement markings, etc. shall be repaired and replaced to a condition equal to or better than the original condition. Existing improvement to be repaired or replaced shall be at the direction of the Engineering Construction Inspector, and shall comply with all Title 24 Disabled Access provisions. Developer shall request a walk- through with the Engineering Construction Inspector before the start of construction to verify existing conditions. 36. SITE SUPERVISION: The General Contractor shall provide qualified supervision on the job site at all times during construction. 37. STREET /SIDEWALK CLOSURE: Any proposed blockage or partial closure of the sidewalk requires an encroachment permit. Special provisions such as limitations on works hours, protective enclosures, or other means to facilitate public access in a safe manner may be required. 38. PLAN CHECK FEES: Plan check fees shall be deposited with the Town prior to plan review at the Engineering Division of the Parks and Public Works Department 39. INSPECTION FEES: Inspection fees shall be deposited with the Town prior to issuance of any Permit or recordation of the Final Map. 40, DESIGN CHANGES: Any proposed changes to the approved plans shall be subject to the approval of the Town prior to when altered work is started. The Applicant Project Engineer shall notify, in writing, the Town Engineer at least 72 hours in advance of all the proposed changes. Any approved changes shall be incorporated into the final "as- built" plans. 41. PLANS AND STUDIES: All required plans and studies shall be prepared by a Registered Professional Engineer in the State of California, and submitted to the Town Engineer for review and approval. 42. GRADING PERMIT: Grading permit is required for all site grading and drainage work except for exemptions listed in Section 12.20.015 of the Town Grading Ordinance. The grading permit application (with grading plans) shall be made to the Engineering Division of the Parks & Public Works Department located at 41 Miles Avenue. The grading plans shall include final grading, drainage, retaining wall location, driveway, utilities and interim erosion control. Grading plans shall list earthwork quantities and a table of existing and proposed impervious areas. Unless specifically allowed by the Director of Parks and Public Works, the grading permit will be issued concurrently with the building permit. The grading permit is for work outside the building footprint(s). A separate building permit, issued by the Building Department on E. Main Street is needed for grading within the building footprint. 43. CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT: Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, it shall be the sole responsibility of the owner /applicant to obtain any and all proposed or required easements and /or permissions necessary to perform the grading herein proposed. Proof of agreement /approval is required prior to issuance of any Permit. 44. DRAINAGE STUDY: Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, the following drainage studies shall be submitted to and approved by the Town Engineer: A drainage study of the project including diversions, off -site areas that drain onto and /or through the project, and justification of any diversions; a drainage study evidencing that proposed drainage patterns will not overload existing storm drains; and detailed drainage studies indicating how the project grading, in conjunction with the drainage conveyance systems including applicable swales, channels, street flows, catch basins, storm drains, and flood water retarding, will allow building pads to be safe from inundation from rainfall runoff which may be expected from all storms up to and including the theoretical 100 -year flood. 45. TREE REMOVAL: Copies of all necessary tree removal permits shall be provided prior to issuance of a grading permit /building permit. 46. SURVEYING CONTROLS: Horizontal and vertical controls shall be set and certified by a licensed surveyor or registered civil engineer qualified to practice land surveying, for the following items: a. Retaining wall - -top of wall elevations and locations b. Toe and top of cut and fill slopes 47. PAD CERTIFICATION: A letter from a licensed land surveyor shall be provided stating that the building foundation was constructed in accordance with the approved plans shall be provided subsequent to foundation construction and prior to construction on the structure. The pad certification shall address both vertical and horizontal foundation placement. 48. PRECONSTRUCTION MEETING: Prior to issuance of any permit or the commencement of any site work, the general contractor shall: a. Along with the project applicant, attend a pre- construction meeting with the Town Engineer to discuss the project conditions of approval, working hours, site maintenance and other construction matters; b. Acknowledge in writing that they have read and understand the project conditions of approval, and will make certain that all project sub - contractors have read and understand them prior to commencing work and that a copy of the project conditions of approval will be posted on site at all times during construction. 49. CERTIFICATE OF LOT MERGER: A Certificate of Lot Merger shall be recorded. Two copies of the legal description for exterior boundary of the merged parcel and a plat map (8- '/2 in. X 11 in.) shall be submitted to the Engineering Division of the Parks & Public Works Department for review and approval. The submittal shall include closure calculations, title reports less than 90 days old and the appropriate fee. The certificate shall be recorded before any permits may be issued. 50. SOILS REPORT: One copy of the soils report shall be submitted with the grading permit application. The soils report shall include specific criteria and standards governing site grading, drainage, pavement design, retaining wall design and erosion control. The reports shall be signed and "wet stamped" by the engineer or geologist, in conformance with Section 6735 of the California Business and Professions Code. 51. SOILS REVIEW: Prior to issuance of any permit, the applicant's soils engineer shall review the final grading and drainage plans to ensure that designs for foundations, retaining walls, site grading, and site drainage are in accordance with their recommendations and the peer review comments. The applicant's soils engineer's approval shall then be conveyed to the Town either by letter or by signing the plans. 52. SOILS ENGINEER CONSTRUCTION OBSERVATION: During construction, all excavations and grading shall be inspected by the applicant's soils engineer prior to placement of concrete and /or backfill so they can verify that the actual conditions are as anticipated in the design - level geotechnical report, and recommend appropriate changes in the recommendations contained in the report, if necessary. The results of the construction observation and testing should be documented in an "as- built" letter /report prepared by the applicants' soils engineer and submitted to the Town before final release of any occupancy permit is granted. 53. WATER DESIGN: Water plans prepared by SJWC must be reviewed and approved prior to issuance of any permit. 54. FRONTAGE IMPROVEMENTS: Applicant shall be required to improve the project's public frontage to current Town Standards. These improvements may include but not limited to curb, gutter, sidewalk, driveway approaches, curb ramps, traffic signal, street lighting (upgrade and /or repaint) etc. 55. UTILITIES: The Developer shall install all new, relocated, or temporarily removed utility services, including telephone, electric power and all other communications lines underground, as required by Town Code Section 27.50.015(b). All new utility services shall be placed underground. Underground conduit shall be provided for cable television service. Applicant is required to obtain approval of all proposed utility alignments from any and all utility service providers. The Town of Los Gatos does not approve or imply approval for final alignment or design of these facilities. 56. SIDEWALK CLOSURE: Any proposed blockage or partial closure of the sidewalk requires an encroachment permit. Special provisions such as limitations on works hours, protective enclosures, or other means to facilitate public access in a safe manner may be required. 57. SIDEWALK REPAIR: The developer shall repair and' replace to existing Town standards any sidewalk damaged now or during construction of this project. Sidewalk repair shall match existing color, texture and design, and shall be constructed per Town Standard Details. The limits of sidewalk repair will be determined by the Engineering Construction Inspector during the construction phase of the project. 58. CURB AND GUTTER: The developer shall repair and replace to existing Town standards any curb and gutter damaged now or during construction of this project. New curb and gutter shall be constructed per Town Standard Details. The limits of curb and gutter repair will be determined by the Engineering Construction Inspector during the construction phase of the proj ect. 59. DRIVEWAY APPROACH: The developer shall install commercial driveway approach. The new driveway approach shall be constructed per Town Standard Details. 60, FENCING: Any fencing proposed within 200 -feet of an intersection shall comply with Town Code Section §23.10.080. 61. SIGHT TRIANGLE AND TRAFFIC VIEW AREA: Any proposed improvements, including but not limiting to trees and hedges, will need to abide by Town Code Section 23.10.080, 26.10.065, 29.40.030. 62. AS -BUILT PLANS: After completion of the construction of all work, the original plans shall have all changes (change orders and field changes) clearly marked. The "as- built" plans shall again be signed and "wet- stamped" by the civil engineer who prepared the plans, attesting to the changes. The original "as- built" plans shall be review and approved the Engineering Inspector. A Mylar and AutoCAD disk of the approved "as- built" plans shall be provided to the Town before the Faithful Performance Security or Occupancy Permit is released. The AutoCAD file shall include only the following information and shall conform to the layer naming convention: a) Building Outline, Layer: BLDG- OUTLINE; b) Driveway, Layer: DRIVEWAY; c) Retaining Wall, Layer: RETAINING WALL; d) Swimming Pool, Layer: SWIMMING -POOL; e) Tennis Court, Layer: TENNIS - COURT; f) Property Line, Layer: PROPERTY -LINE; g) Contours, Layer: NEWCONTOUR. All as -built digital files must be on the same coordinate basis as the Town's survey control network and shall be submitted in AutoCAD version 2000 or higher. 63. TRAFFIC STUDY: Any development of land use that generates greater traffic impacts than those assumed in the St. Mary's School Expansion Traffic Study (dated July 12, 2012) shall require an updated traffic study utilizing a methodology approved by the Town. The Town may impose additional conditions on the applicant or development based on the updated Town - approved traffic study. 64. CONSTRUCTION TRAFFIC: All construction traffic and related vehicular routes shall be submitted for review and approval by the Town Engineer prior to issuance of permit. 65. TRAFFIC IMPACT MITIGATION FEE: The developer shall pay a fee proportional to the project's share of transportation improvement needed to serve cumulative development within the Town of Los Gatos. The fee amount will be based upon the Town Council resolution in effect at the time the building permit application is made. The fee shall be paid before the building permit is issued. The traffic impact mitigation fee for this project, using the current fee schedule and the preliminary plans is $11,494.98. The final fee shall be calculated from the final plans using the rate schedule in effect at the time of the building permit application, using a trip generation rate based on commercial use. 66. TRAFFIC IMPACT COMMUNITY BENEFIT: The developer is required to provide Community Benefit based on the Town Traffic Impact Policy, 67. CONSTRUCTION STREET PARKING: No vehicle having a manufacture's rated gross vehicle weight exceeding ten thousand (10,000) pounds shall be allowed to park on the portion of a street which abuts property in a residential zone without prior to approval from the Town Engineer. 68. TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN: The project sponsor will be required to work with the Engineering Division of the Parks and Public Works Department to develop a traffic control plan for incorporation into the construction bid documents (specifications), and this plan will include, but not be limited to, the following measures: a. Construction activities shall be strategically timed and coordinated to minimize traffic disruption for schools, residents, businesses, special events, and other projects in the area. The schools located on the haul route shall be contacted to help with the coordination of the trucking operation to minimize traffic disruption. b. Flag persons shall be placed at locations necessary to control one -way traffic flow. All flag persons shall have the capability of communicating with each other to coordinate the operation. c. Prior to construction, advance notification of all affected residents and emergency services shall be made regarding one -way operation, specifying dates and hours of operation. 69. HAULING OF SOIL: Hauling of soil on or off -site shall not occur during the morning or evening peak periods (between 7:00 a.m. and 9:00 a.m. and between 4:00 p.m. and 6:00 p.m.). Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the developer shall work with the Town Building and Engineering Department Engineering Inspectors to devise a traffic control plan to ensure safe and efficient traffic flow under periods when soil is hauled on or off the project site. This may include, but is not limited to provisions for the developer /owner to place construction notification signs noting the dates and time of construction and hauling activities, or providing additional traffic control. Coordination with other significant projects in the area may also be required. Cover all trucks hauling soil, sand, and other loose debris or require all trucks to maintain at least two feet of freeboard. 70. CONSTRUCTION NOISE: Between the hours of 8:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m., weekdays and 9:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. weekends and holidays, construction, alteration or repair activities shall be allowed. No individual piece of equipment shall produce a noise level exceeding eighty -five (85) dBA at twenty -five (25) feet. If the device is located within a structure on the property, the measurement shall be made at distances as close to twenty -five (25) feet from the device as possible. The noise level at any point outside of the property plane shall not exceed eighty -five (85) dBA. 71. CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT PLAN: The Applicant shall submit a construction management plan that shall incorporate at a minimum the Earth Movement Plan, Traffic Control Plan, Project Schedule, site security fencing, employee parking, construction staging area, construction trailer, and proposed outhouse locations. 72. WVSD (West Valley Sanitation District): Sanitary sewer laterals are televised by West Valley Sanitation District and approved by the Town of Los Gatos before they are used or reused. Sanitary Sewer Clean -out is required for each property at the property line or location specify by the Town. 73. SANITARY SEWER BACKWATER VALVE: Drainage piping serving fixtures which have flood level rims less than twelve (12) inches (304.8 mm) above the elevation of the next upstream manhole and /or flushing inlet cover at the public or private sewer system serving such drainage piping shall be protected from backflow of sewage by installing an approved type backwater valve. Fixtures above such elevation shall not discharge through the backwater valve, unless first approved by the Administrative. The Town shall not incur any liability or responsibility for damage resulting from a sewer overflow where the property owner or other person has failed to install a backwater valve as defined in the Uniform Plumbing Code adopted by the Town and maintain such device in a functional operation condition. Evidence of West Sanitation District's decision on whether a backwater device is needed shall be provided prior to issuance of a building permit. 74. BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES (BMP's): Best Management Practices (BMPs) shall be maintained and be placed for all areas that have been graded or disturbed and for all material, equipment and /or operations that need protection. Removal of BMPs (temporary removal during construction activities) shall be placed at the end of each working day. 75. STORMWATER DEVELOPMENT RUNOFF. All new development and redevelopment projects subject to the stormwater development runoff requirements. Every applicant shall submit a stormwater control plan and implement conditions of approval that reduce stormwater pollutant discharges through the construction, operation and maintenance of treatment measures and other appropriate source control and site design measures. Increases in runoff volume and flows shall be managed in accordance with the development runoff requirements 76. SITE DESIGN MEASURES: All projects must incorporate the following measures to the maximum extent practicable: a. Protect sensitive areas and minimize changes to the natural topography. b. Minimize impervious surface areas. c. Direct roof downspouts to vegetated areas where feasible. d. Use permeable pavement surfaces where feasible. e. Use landscaping to treat stormwater. 77. DUST CONTROL: Blowing dust shall be reduced by timing construction activities so that paving and building construction begin as soon as possible after completion of grading, and by landscaping disturbed soils as soon as possible. Further, water trucks shall be present and in use at the construction site. All portions of the site subject to blowing dust shall be watered as often as deemed necessary by the Town, or a minimum of three times daily, or apply (non- toxic) soil stabilizers on all unpaved access roads, parking areas, and staging areas at construction sites in order to insure proper control of blowing dust for the duration of the project. Watering on public streets shall not occur. Streets will be cleaned by street sweepers or by hand as often as deemed necessary by the Town Engineer, or at least once a day. Watering associated with on -site construction activity shall take place between the hours of 8 a.m, and 5 p.m. and shall include at least one late- afternoon watering to minimize the effects of blowing dust. All public streets soiled or littered due to this construction activity shall be cleaned and swept on a daily basis during the workweek to the satisfaction of the Town. Demolition or earthwork activities shall be halted when wind speeds (instantaneous gusts) exceed 25 MPH. All trucks hauling soil, sand, or other loose debris shall be covered. 78. CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES: All construction shall conform to the latest requirements of the CASQA Stormwater Best Management Practices Handbooks for Construction Activities and New Development and Redevelopment, the ABAG Manual of Standards for Erosion & Sediment Control Measures, the Town's grading and erosion control ordinance and other generally accepted engineering practices for erosion control as required by the Town Engineer when undertaking construction activities. 79. SITE DRAINAGE: Rainwater leaders shall be discharged to splash blocks. No through curb drains will be allowed. Any storm drain inlets (public or private) directly connected to public storm system shall be stenciled /signed with appropriate "NO DUMPING - Flows to Bay" NPDES required language. On -site drainage systems for all projects shall include one of the alternatives included in section C.3.i of the Municipal Regional NPDES Permit. These include storm water reuse via cisterns or rain barrels, directing runoff from impervious surfaces to vegetated areas and use of permeable surfaces. If dry wells are to be used they shall be placed 10' minimum from adjacent property line and /or right of way. 80. STORM WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN: A storm water management shall be included with the grading permit application for all Group 1 and Group 2 projects as defined in the amended provisions C.3 of the Municipal Regional Stormwater NPDES Permit, Order R2- 2009 -074. The plan shall delineate source control measures and BMP's together with the sizing calculations. The plan shall be certified by a professional pre - qualified by the Town. In the event that storm water measures proposed on the Planning approval differ significantly from those certified on the Building /Grading Permit, the Town may require a modification of the Planning approval prior to release of the Building Permit. The applicant may elect to have the Planning submittal certified to avoid this possibility. 81. AGREEMENT FOR STORMWATER BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE OBLIGATIONS: The property owner shall enter into an agreement with the Town for maintenance of the stormwater filtration devices required to be installed on this project by Town's Stormwater Discharge Permit and all current amendments or modifications. The agreement will specify that certain routine maintenance shall be performed by the property owner and will specify device maintenance reporting requirements. The agreement will also specify routine inspection requirements, permits and payment of fees. The agreement shall be recorded prior to release of any occupancy permits. 82. SILT AND MUD IN PUBLIC RIGHT -OF -WAY: It is the responsibility of contractor and home owner to make sure that all dirt tracked into the public right -of -way is cleaned up on a daily basis. Mud, silt, concrete and other construction debris SHALL NOT be washed into the Town's storm drains. 83. GOOD HOUSEKEEPING: Good housekeeping practices shall be observed at all times during the course of construction. Superintendence of construction shall be diligently performed by a person or persons authorized to do so at all times during working hours. The storing of goods and/or materials on the sidewalk and /or the street will not be allowed unless a special permit is issued by the Engineering Division. The adjacent public right -of -way shall be kept clear of all job related dirt and debris at the end of the day. Dirt and debris shall not be washed into storm drainage facilities. The storing of goods and material's on the sidewalk and /or the street will not be allowed unless a special permit is issued. The developer's representative in charge shall be at the job site during all working hours. Failure to maintain the public right -of -way according to this condition may result in the Town performing the required maintenance at the developer's expense. 84. NEIGHBORHOOD CONSTRUCTION COMMUNICATION PLAN: The applicant shall initiate a weekly neighborhood e -mail notification program to provide project status updates. The e -mail notices will also be posted on a bulletin board placed in a prominent location along the project perimeter. 85. PERMIT ISSUANCE: Permits for each phase; reclamation, landscape, and grading, shall be issued simultaneously. 86. COVERED TRUCKS: All trucks transporting materials to and from the site shall be covered. 87. FUTURE STUDIES: Any post project traffic or parking counts, or other studies imposed by Planning Commission or Town Council shall be fielded by the applicant. TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE SANTA CLARA COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT: 88. FIRE APPARATUS (ENGINE) ACCESS ROADS REQUIRED: Provide access roadways with a paved all weather surface, a minimum unobstructed width of 20 feet, vertical clearance of 13 feet 6 inches, minimum circulating turning radius of 36 feet outside and 23 feet inside, and a maximum slope of 15 %. For installation guidelines refer to Fire Department Standards Details and Specifications sheet A -1. 89, FIRE LANE MARKING REQUIRED: Provide marking for all roadways within the project. Markings shall be per fire department specifications. Installations shall also conform to Local Government Standards and Fire Department Standard Details and SpecificationsA -6. 90. FIRE SPRINKLERS REQUIRED: Approved automatic sprinkler systems in new buildings and existing buildings and structures shall be provided in the locations described in this Section or in Sections 903.2.1 through 9032.18 whichever is the more restrictive. For the purposed of this Section, firewalls used to separate building areas shall be constructed in accordance with the California building Code and shall be without openings or penetrations. An automatic fire sprinkler system shall be provided throughout all new buildings and structures. Exception: Group A, B, E, F, I, L, M, S and U occupancy buildings and structures that do not exceed 1,000 square feet of building area and that are not located in the Wild land -Urban Interface Fire Area. Where provisions of this code require that a building or portion thereof be equipped throughout with an automatic sprinkler system in accordance with this section, the sprinklers shall be installed throughout in accordance with NFPA 13 except as provided in Section 903.3.1.1.1 and local standards. For new buildings having no designated use or tenant, the minimum sprinkler design density shall be Ordinary Hazard Group 2. 912.2 Location. With respect to hydrants, driveways, buildings and landscaping, fire department connections shall be so located that fire apparatus and hose connected to supply the system will not obstruct access to the building for other fire apparatus. The location of fire department connections shall be approved by the fire code official. A State of California licensed (C -16) Fire Protection Contractor shall submit plans, calculations, a completed permit application and appropriate fees to the fire department for review and approval prior to beginning their work. 91. POTABLE WATER SUPPLIES: Potable water supplies shall be protected from contamination caused by fire protection water supplies. It is the responsibility of the applicant and any contractors and subcontractors to contact the water purveyor supplying the site of such project, and to comply with the requirements of that purveyor. Such requirements shall be incorporated into the design and any water -based fire protection systems, and /or fire suppression water supply systems or storage containers that may be physically connected in any manner to an appliance capable of causing contamination of the potable water supply of the purveyor of record. Final approval of the system(s) under consideration will not be granted by this office until compliance with the requirements of the water purveyor of record are documented by that purveyor as having been met by the applicant(s). 92. PRIVATE ON -SITE STANDPIPE REQUIRED: Provide one private on -site standpipe installed at a location to be determined by the Fire Department, with a minimum acceptable flow of 1,000 GPM at 20 psi residual pressure. Prior to design, the project civil engineer shall meet with the fire department water supply officer to jointly spot the required fire hydrant locations. 93. EMERGENCY GATE /ACCESS GATE REQUIREMENTS: Gate installations shall conform with Fire Department Standards Details and Specification G -1 and, when opened shall not obstruct any portion of the required width for emergency access roadways or driveways. Locks, if provided, shall be fire department approved prior to installation. Gates across the emergency access roadways shall be equipped with an approved access device. If the gates are operated electrically, an approved Knox key switch shall be installed; if they are operated manually, then approved Knox padlock shall be installed. Gates providing access from a road to a driveway or other roadway shall be at least 30 feet from the road being exited. 94. CONSTRUCTION SITE FIRE SAFETY: All construction sites must comply with applicable provisions of the CFC Chapter 14 and the Fire Department's Standards Detail and Specification SI -7. 95. PREMISES IDENTIFICATION: approved numbers or addresses shall be placed on all new and existing buildings in such a position as to be plainly visible and legible from the street or road fronting the property. Numbers shall contrast with their background. 96. ACCESS TO BUILDINGS /LANDSCAPING REQUIREMENTS: Landscaping shall not obstruct Fire Department ladder access to buildings. The building permit submittal shall include a landscape drawing which reflects the location of all landscaping, to include how Fire Department ladder access will be provided around all buildings. Ground - ladder rescue from second and third floor rooms shall be made possible for fire department operations. With the climbing angle of seventy five degrees maintained, an approximate walkway width along either side of the building shall be no less than seven feet clear. Landscaping shall not be allowed to interfere with the required access. An approved walkway shall be provided on all sides of the building(s) leading from the fire access roadway to the exterior openings of the building(s). 97. ROOF ACCESS: Provision shall be made to allow emergency responder access to all portions of the roof, as approved by the Fire Department. 98, EMERGENCY ACCESS KEY BOX REQUIRED: It is the Santa Clara County Fire Department's policy that a key box be required for buildings that are equipped with fire sprinklers and /or fire alarm systems. This policy will only help facilitate the quick response of emergency crews to the interior of a building. 99. TIMING OF REQUIRED WATER SUPPLY INSTALLATIONS: Installations of required fire service(s) and fire hydrant(s) shall be tested and accepted by the Fire Department, prior to the start of framing or delivery of bulk combustible materials. Building permit issuance may be withheld until required installations are completed, tested, and accepted. 100. TIMING OF REQUIRED ROADWAY INSTALLATIONS: Required access roads, up through first lift of asphalt, shall be installed and accepted by the Fire Department prior to the start of combustible construction. During construction, emergency access roads shall be maintained clear and unimpeded. Note that building permit issuance may be withheld until installations are completed. Temporary access roads may be approved on a case by case basis. 101. FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS IN PRIVATE SCHOOLS: An automatic fire alarm system shall be provided in new buildings of private schools. Exception: Automatic detection devices are not required where an approved automatic sprinkler system is installed in accordance with (CFC) Section 903.3.1.1 and the occupant notification appliances will activate on sprinkler water flow and manual activation is provided from a normally occupied location. *Required as a Mitigation Measure. N: \DEV \CONDITNS \2013 \Bean219.doex �I U " rl E O P, O I 'rn - 0 o 0 � bA � O p � N N b � 4-+ �Oa / Q 03 al N N U U 3i -Ci N cn cd 41 zj bA P, U cs O Cd U N bA N i a, U cn s~ O O ti 'p O) p" cn cd U rn ct bA fl cd O N „-Vii ¢i . 5 N 04-4 N Vi p p �-� bA j^� 0 bA Vi CCS � U� O 10 P� -0 Cd .3 U W N N N U ° �"" U U N a N N +a co Q v, O In ° -, cd � cd cn cr3 N 'd p N « s cn E- O cj U 'O N � U unip r 5 N CD CD n 0 cD < CFt CD � w -n aG "d ' ° d D O Uq O d p q dvO d N� t° CD `a� tea. O p ��i �' O n 7G S C s O . O 0 a R. C 0 O o N O ® z p ° C '� CbD d CD rt t3 Q Sy G7 O o CD o (D .-+ ® O C) �,✓ � ° cn � � n � ''� � can' '"• ,'S' ¢ n o0 aa �. 00 0 °0 o (D CD cn CD U2 CD CD "c3 P O CD O CD CD rh CD CD CD ! CD n CD CD CD a+ 'rs CD O R• cn CD rr C) ny C aq 0 Uq H a a• O Uq o' UO 0 bA O bA O "t7 H bA bbo U O U 2 i O O Ct � c� O � (4-4 o o 0 z3 .- ,z) C3 L� U 10), N O C< � �i U t cad O o CIS CS p 3 V cri ra� 0" v N O U U p N fl U (FU�� p N O U O p O ci Cd U O O 'C N *5 1 fUj N a U U O BO r 4) A Cd CA ejCd -o qj 2 a� ° 3� o ¢ r cn FN 04, Usti— �•�.� CD m 12 4� c N U U V f�l 9 O -' V cn O N u Q U U o cd U o '� P� o U U p o M RD s CD' c2 UQ O p . S O Or CD n � � O-r ° �' � o 0 0 0 �' ,�, o CD �'. a t w o o m o o° o z CD 0 PO CD W — O C7j cn P n r� C) COD `C W p cn `' p CD ° r tHn' b `CS O Q 5 C" O cn I p p CD a• PO CD O\ O ° Pt. b Z Iq Q ® n W H . n�i - 'ti A CD O n CD H • O' O cn ID CD CD p cn cn > CU O d a' cn CD CD r r C Onr N Cl) H �. `C , O d vOi O O o N �d CT' N r CAD r0 r0 CIO cn N (D V~i R 'LS O N+. CD CD f r N O O FL v0 A N CAD N Cl Cep O x d CD o D n H � O ti t y.+ . H H CD - C C H N C CD 11F -1C,lj �D CD o 0 o P r- HF O �°� n` H. N• UQ �j o cd a o 4J 4-1 v P .� , _ O «i U P U U cn r N N � O O p o bA C 4-4 O O 0 O U +�- O O `� O 0 c p• cad N O 5, 9 US p +- N � PN U .� d H O Q" � Pp rA " r N 3+ b�A W 'd O O O• S •'" p p "mod N U r1 N N U d z74 O N r, 00 cn o (D cli O Q Q V1 N N +� O~ Cd O O O Cd CA V 4) C7" N rN • r�i� Cd JQ o US 00 0 O .� Q Pl-1 cd ai —0- S- 0 U 00 b4 W p0 U N iO +� 02 Cd cc-d kn . O ''z cn F-• . �, ° �• , Y� . `.� F'i l i U] 1_-• • . fah 0 IM O � . p' �' O .z t:� `' ��' _ zy W ' O O r4 CD N • CD r Vl !1 p (D :� N R UQ i tz N N t-.. t i -t � p a- 0- F; a CD UQ O 6 O O 0 .� � � � O � iC 0 Cu d 0 O C7 v(Di cn CD CD 0 cn NO .0 N vrt, n' v' (dD _ _ G C3' n Wi '' L7 0 v UA 0 1+ 0 0 0 cn 0 p st ® rn n CD cn' CD U N CD W O t A� v� (D� O N O R v'zi C¢ �C UQ n n cu CD (D (D cn G RR 10 Q o � ;n Q n O C3 IQ N z o •-1 aW� z b r e z 0 0 0 00 T N 0 00 00 E-� 0 s� b U O 00 a\ O N 00 O O C 0 0 r" b i z z� O M � U U �1 ti � Q � Cd U t4O O O 03 �+ CZ� O O � � � O � O � N � � a y�y O r-y b O � cl- This Page Intentionally Left Blank St. MarrYs Church January 14, 2013 Ms. Jennifer Savage RECEIVED TOWN OF LOS GATOS Community Development Department / Planning Division AN 15 2013 110 E. Main Street Los Gatos, CA 95030 TOWN Or LOS GATOS PLANNING DIVISION RE: St. Mary's Church and School Application for PD Zoning /Lot Line Combination & Architectural Design Review 219 Bean Avenue & 59 Victory Lane Dear Ms. Savage: Attached is our application for the creation of a Planned Development (PD) Zoning District for our various Parish properties in downtown Los Gatos. We have also included supporting documentation for a Lot Line Combination at 59 Victory Lane, Architectural Design Review for a new 2 -story Jr. High School Building, and improvements to the existing 1 -story `Grammar School' Building. We also seek to update parking /staff/student quotas limited by our current Conditional Use Permit issued in 1985 to reflect our current operations. We thank Town staff for all of the help over the years providing positive guidance and feedback on our various developments and improvements. HISTORY St. Mary's was originally established in Los Gatos as a mission on Santa Cruz Avenue between Main Street and Bean Avenue. In 1912, the small hall used as the church was moved to the corner of Bean and Tait, and St. Mary's was established as a parish in its present location. Two years later the first permanent rectory was built on parish property, and the current church was built in 1962. The school was opened in 1954 and has provided a solid academic education for thousands of students in our community. In 1985, a Conditional Use Permit was issued to St. Mary's Church and School when Lyndon Avenue was converted into a cul de sac, and St. Mary's built its Pastoral Center which includes a multi - purpose room, administrative center, and school and ministry offices. All of the conditions for the approval and guaranteed improvements were made as outlined in Resolution 1985 -47. (Note that this document references our `baseline' approvals: CUP U- 84 -17, A &SA 5- 84 -60, and Subdivision Application M -84 -21 respectively). We have also used the 59 Victory Lane Building as our Library, Science Lab, 8th grade, Spanish & All classes for many years as part of our overall school operations. During the past 26 years, the church and school have experienced leadership changes of executive staff (pastor and 219 Bean Avenue Q. Los Gatos, California 95030 0 408.354.3726 Q fax 408.354.9302 principal), administrative staff, and volunteer leadership in the parish. Consequently, current management of the church and school were unaware of the existence of the Conditional Use Permit and its restrictions. Once the CUP was called to our attention, we proceeded to gather information to file the application for updating the CUP. PD ZONING / DEVELOPMENT AREA We seek to replace severely aging and outdated facilities to ensure we can deliver a quality education product in modern facilities. The construction of a two story classroom/library building at our eastern property line will allow us to use our current facilities during construction without the use of temporary trailers or rental facilities. Once completed, the demolition of 59 Victory Lane will then allow for replacement of parking /play area. Our existing early 1950's era `Grammar School' is also in need of major restoration and much needed expansion. We seek to create a more distinct Kindergarten area and provide plumbing facilities at each classroom. Complete renovation of the aged restroom facilities would provide compliance with disabled access requirements. The Parish also seeks to retain the option for demolition our existing `Teen Center'. The one - story building on the northeast corner of our campus is approximately 1,000 square feet. It is an aging building that we have used primarily for child care or teen activities for the past few years. In 2009, we received approval from the Town to replace it with a two -story single family home of approximately 3,000- square -feet to serve as the future rectory, the home of the priests who live on campus and serve our parish community. We have attached the future rectory plans for your reference only. Because these plans were completed prior to the design of the new Junior High School building, some modifications to the future rectory plans would be needed to coordinate with the new campus plan. We believe these changes and modifications could be done in the future. Currently the priests reside in a two -story building just east of the church that is also used for parish offices, meeting space and storage. At the existing rectory, 3,035 square feet are used for the priests' residences and 1,085 square feet are used for parish offices, meeting space, and storage. Following construction of the future rectory, the entire existing rectory will be converted to parish office and administrative use. The existing Administrative Building will continue to be used for both school and parish administrative uses. CUP MODIFICATIONS We seek as part of the PD Zoning Process to modify our Conditional Use Permit that describes the level of activity at the church and school that has existed for many years: Condition 13 / Part 1: Student Enrollment in St. Mary's School St. Mary's School has been in operation since 1954, and its enrollment has fluctuated according to population trends and the desire of parents to provide their children with values -based education. Enrollment was at more than 400 in the 1960s when the large Baby Boom generation page 2 overflowed every classroom (private and public). At that time, as many as 50 students were assigned to each of St. Mary's classrooms. When the original Conditional Use Permit was issued in 1985, population trends had changed and there were many fewer students to be accommodated in elementary schools. The student population at that time was 265 students in grades 1 -8. Now, the population of school -age children has increased once again and St. Mary's School currently serves 296 students in grades 1 -8. In 1999, a local private preschool/kindergarten closed and St. Mary's School added a kindergarten class to help fill this educational void. [Public school classrooms in Los Gatos were also filled to overflowing.] St. Mary's added a 35- student kindergarten program in academic year 1999 -2000, bringing the total number of current students to 315. We request to update the maximum student enrollment to 315 children. There are no plans to increase student enrollment now or in the future as our facilities will not support them (9 Classrooms x 35 Students/Room = 315 Students) Condition 2 / Part 2: Number of Employees at St. Mary's Church & School The existing CUP states that 20 employees are expected to work at the site. It does not mention how many volunteers routinely worked at the church and school, but we know there were many. We have seen a significant change in the way work is accomplished in churches of all denominations, in all parts of the country. The amount of work has not necessarily increased, but churches are less reliant on volunteers and more dependent on paid staff. Consequently, the number of people working in the office is about the same, but their status has changed from volunteer to employee. When all programs are operating fully St. Mary's Church employs 8 full - time staff and 5 part -time staff (equaling 2.1 FTE). St. Mary's School is a nine - months -a -year operation. It does not offer summer school. The school currently employees 15 fall -time staff and 25 part-time staff (equaling 10.6 FTE), One FTE is equal to 40 hours per week. We request that the Conditional Use Permit for St. Mary's Church and School be updated to reflect the 35.7 FTE employees who work here. For parking purposes we will use 36. As demographics and the economy fluctuate, there may be the need in the future for St. Mary's to increase the number of employees as the number of volunteers decreases. Parking; Related Information Currently there are a total of 105 parking spaces on the St. Mary's property. There are 72 marked spaces, 3 spaces in the garage, plus room for an additional 30 cars in unmarked spaces in the children's "play area" at the center of campus. In addition, the current 59 Victory Lane property has one on -site parking space and six off -site parking credits. We will continue to provide the one (1) on -site parking space as required for the Downtown Parking district. The existing CUP recognizes the 105 parking spaces as an approved, nonconforming situation, and allows nonconforming church uses to continue interminably. There has been no change to the number of seats in the church (654). We believe there is more than sufficient space to handle parking of employees for both the school and church on a daily operational basis. page 3 In years past, a discussion between a school representative and the Town traffic engineer, it was related by the traffic engineer that the change in the number of employees calculates to fewer than 20 trips and, as a result, does not require a traffic study. When school is not in session, such as during weekend masses or evening religious activities, the blacktop playground is used for parking, bringing the total on -site parking capacity to approximately 105. This parking is self- directed. Our required vehicular access to Victory Lane will be maintained in the proposed work. An ongoing communications program works to educate the parish community about parking options on the St. Mary's property and in adjacent public lots via flyers, bulletin, website (www.stmaryslg.or ), meetings such as State of the School and asking school families to ride share. [See attached flyers, webpage and bulletin articles as examples.] Continuing efforts are made to remind parishioners and their guests to be sensitive to the needs and concerns of other residents of the St. Mary's neighborhood. (HOURS OF OPERATION 7:30 a.m. to 9:30 p.m., seven days a week. On rare occasions, there will be a need to have a religious service during other hours. For example, after the September 1 lch tragedy, some people needed to find comfort with private prayer in the church. There was no formal mass, but the church was opened to the community during other hours. COMMUNITY USE OF FACILITIES In the past, the Town has requested that St. Mary's list the community groups (not affiliated with our religious activities) that use our facilities. These include: Almond Grove Neighborhood Watch meeting(s) Almond Grove Neighborhood Annual Block Party American Red Cross — six times per year, during the day (Blood Drive) Los Gatos Rotary Club — annual event (Crab Feed) Los Gatos Lions — annual event (Cioppino Feed) Handicapables — annual event ICF Polenta Dinner/Dance — twice per year YMCA — annual event (Father Daughter Dance) Country Fair — As you know, the parish also organizes our annual Country Fair one weekend in October. This is an event that is open to the public. The activities of St. Mary's church and school are community benefits. In fact, that is all that we do at St. Mary's — provide our parishioners and the community -at -large with religious programs and services that they desire. On average, the community uses the church and school facilities approximately 13 days per calendar year. As was stated in the original Conditional Use Permit issued by the Town, St. Mary's is "in harmony with the various elements and objectives of the General Plan and the Zoning page 4 Ordinance, because a church is allowed in any zone and this church was there before the Town was incorporated." ARCHITECTURE AND SITE APPLICATION: New Junior High School Building and Lower School Renovation With this application we are requesting Architecture and Site review for the new Junior High School building and for renovations to the existing Lower School building. The scope of work consists of the following: - Construction of a new, approximately 13,500 square foot classroom building on the existing campus of St. Mary's parish and school. The building consists of general education classrooms, a breakout room, a science lab, and art classroom, a library and related office spaces. The building is two stories above grade with a standard concrete spread footing foundation system and wood frame construction. The building is occupancy type E, construction type V -B. The building will be equipped throughout with an automatic fire sprinkler system and fire alarm. - Partial demolition of one classroom in the existing Lower School building to create a new walkway. No new square footage is added. - Demolition of existing one story building at 59 Victory Lane and lot line combination. - Construction of a new, approximately 3,000 square foot covered eating area. - Site utilities, pedestrian walkways and concrete flatwork to support new development. The site work includes a new masonry wall along the South and East property lines. The wall ranges in height from 6' -0" to 8' -0." The height is needed to maintain security and privacy near the school area of the parish campus. As you know, our kinder playground is adjacent to a public parking lot. The variation in height is due to the existing slope of the site, especially along Victory Lane. We are not requesting Architecture and Site review at this time for the proposed future church - related residential structure or for the addition to the existing Lower School building. We are not requesting an expansion of our property boundaries on increase in number seats in the church, but we do need to replace and update our aging school buildings with modern facilities. We also seek to update our CUP to reflect what currently exists: • Change the number of students in St. Mary's School from 265 to 315 • Change the number of employees for St. Mary's Church and School from 20 to 35.7 FTE employees who work there and reflect the current level of religious programs and activities underway at St. Mary's Church and School that benefit the entire community We believe there is sufficient on -site parking for the number of students and employees, according to the standard school parking formula used by the Town to handle our normal operations. page 5 As you can see we, have much to accomplish. If you may remember, we had a successful review and construction project for our After - School Care Room in 2009. We worked with the community and Town Staff to mitigate any concerns. The result has been a success for the Parish and Neighborhood. We look forward to meeting with you as soon as you have completed your 30 -day Review. Please let us know if there is additional background or detail needed for your review and we will work to provide as diligently as possible. Cordially, Rev, Rick Rodoni Pastor, St. Mary's Parish & School Cc: Sr. Nicki Thomas, Principal, SMS Jeffrey T. Berg, AIA / Steinberg Architects Mr. Ian Abell, Diocese of San Jose Ms. Teri Tucci, SMP Attachment 1: Additional Background: St. Mary's Parish statistics Attachment 2: Parking Flyer, Webpage, Bulletin Articles Attachment 3: Future Rectory Drawings page 6 Attachment 1: ADDITIONAL BACKGROUND We thought it might be helpful to provide some statistics on the growth of the St. Mary's community in the past 27 years. If you would prefer to see year -by -year statistics, please let us know. page 7 1985 1990 1995 2002 2006 2010 Number of 183 194 207 198 212 194 families with [# is for children at St. 1989, the Mary's School first year info available] Number of students at St. Mary's School 236 262 280 280 280 290 in grades 1 -8 Number of Kindergart Kindergart Kindergart 35 students at St. en classes en classes en classes (60% are 35 35 Mary's School in not offered not not siblings) Kindergarten until 1999 offered offered until 1999 until 1999 Number of families 1450 1532 1648 2290 2496 2082 registered as members of St. Mary's Church Average 1581 1351 1614• 1752 1445 1373 attendance by per per per per individuals at weekend weekend weekend weekend weekend masses Number of 5 5 5 5 5 5 weekend masses Number of 65 62 65 34 16 15 page 7 weddings at St. Mary's Number of 44 41 38 35 40 19 funerals [# is for at St. Mary's 1986, the first year info is available] Number of baptisms 93 127 168 191 71 131 at St. Mary's page 8 -, - 66o. Please remember to use the cl -gn d. parkin�-areas (noted 6elow)while at ' Marr�'s. es► ate Parking is also- availa6le-alongl5ean Avenue (on the 51-_. M'are's side). a a ay I hanL �ou. Additional' downtown parking areas are noted' on the reverse side. STO AiAR-t XT COUNTRY -arl-I -UAIER As we know, parking is an issue in our neighbor - hood. In an effort to alleviate this problem here are some things you can do: ar p ool whenever possible k1ways attempt to use the towns public parking lots first (see map on back.) eme ber, you can have someone drop you off and pick you up TV n'o a walk., ride our bikes), roll.erblade, run, etc. 1 y �' to the Country Fair ST. MARY'S CHURCH Maus Intentions for the Week Monday, Aug. 21 7:30am Ruth Borre + Tuesday, Aug. 22 7 :30am Dr. Ed Marcuz + Wednesday, Aug. 23 7:30am Harold Johnson + Thursday, Aug. 24 7:30am Denes Kassai + Friday, Aug. 25 7:30am Ann Longo + Saturday, Aug. 26 7:30am Francis Hayes + 5:00pm Ted Hettel + Sunday, Aug. 27 7:30 am Arline Petersen + 9:00 am Fred Callis + 11:15 am Kathryn Blanchard + 6:00 pm Parishioners Please place this week's Scripture Readings (Aug. 13th) in this box. Thanks! Be kind to our neighbors ... In our bulletin on July 31st we inserted a flyer suggesting available parking areas when coming to St. Mary's for mass or any other event here. If you missed the flyer you can find the information on our website: www.chtirchregistrv.com/Lmlg. If you have any questions or concerns about parking, please contact Teri Tueci at 354 -3726 ext. 37. REPORT ON COLLECTIONS FOR 8/13/2000 Actual: $14,920.53 YTD: $71,684.53 Goal: $16,176.50 YTD: $69,373.14 Variance: $ 1,255.97 YT-,D- $ 2,311.39 LOS GATOS REMINDER AUGUST 15 is the feast of the Assumption of the Blessed Virgin Mary. It is a fact that some of the Holy Days have been moved to the next Sunday or are not celebrated. ITowever, the Assumption is still considered as a Holy Day of Obligation. Mass will be celebrated at 7:30 a.m. and 7:30 p.m. ATTENTION LECTORS & EUCHARISTIC MINISTERS: We will begin processing the schedule for Oct. -Dec. the last week of August. Contact us at (408) 354 -4061 ext. 35 with any necessary "change of status" for inclusion in this schedule. Please check the vestibule of the church for retreat information front the various retreat centers located within our diocese. REGISTRATION INFORMATION If you have recently started attending our parish or have been attending but have never registered, please come by the parish office OR pick up a registration form in the Vestibule. Registering in the parish benefits all of us. We begin to know who you are and you receive general parish mailings and Sunday envelopes. Without specific use of envelopes, it is impossible for its to keep track of any donations you make to the Church. Don't procrastinate. Register today ATTENTION THE ABATEMENT PROCESS HAS BEGUN IN THE BELL TOWER AND REAR CONFESSIONAL. WE WILL BE CONTINUING WITH THIS PROCESS BEGINNING THIS WEEK. THANK YOU FOR YOUR PATIENCE AS THE CHURCH UNDERGOES THIS CONSTRUCTION PROJECT. ST. MARY'S CHURCH Mass Intentions for the Week Monday, October 2 7:30am Linnet Loiseau + Tuesday, October 3 7:30am Eduardo San Juan + Wednesday, October 4 7:30am Marge Goldstrom & Margaret Bernardo,.> 9:00 am Anna Michalski Thursday, October 5 7:30am Antonio Alvernaz + Friday, October 6 Alice Winter & Helen Marcotte + Saturday, October 7 7:30am Carmelites + 5:00pm Daoud S. Dinno + Sunday, October 8 7:30 am Dr. William Chaikin + 9:00 am Parishioners 11:15 am George Bernardo, 6:00 pm Conti Luigia + Be kind to our neighbors ... Please make every effort to park in our parking lots and public parking lot #6 before parking in front of our neighbors' homes. To find out more about where you can park, you can find the information on our website: www.churc_ hrgista-y.com /smlg. If you have any questions or concerns about parking, please contact Teri Tucci at 354 -3726 ext. 37. SERRA CLUB OF SAN JOSE Almighty God, your son Jesus told us to pray for vocations since the harvest is great and the laborers are .few. Help all of us who center our Catholic lives in word and sacrament to be active promoters of vocations to the priesthood and religious life. The ministry of identifying any nurturing vocations belongs to each member of each family in our parish family. May we all accept this mission from Jesus with the determination that comes from faith. REPORT ON COLLECTIONS FOR 9/17/2000 Actual: $16,398.50 YTD: $175,965.46 Goal: $16,176.50 YTD: $194,118.50 Variance: $222.00 YTD: ($18,153.04) LOS GATOS SPIRITUALLY 'ENHANCING OPPORTUNITIES Beyond Sunday The most recent "Beyond Sunday" newsletter was mailed to all registered parishioners last week. Additional copies of this newsletter can be found at exits of church and in parish offices. Please consider what activities you can participate in and send in the 'registration form' enclosed in the newsletter. All events are open to parishioners and their family and friends. All registrants will be placed on the 'attendees list' for the events with contact only if a particular session /series is 'full'. Check date and location for event, show Lip, and you will be expected! If you have questions call 354- 406105. Small Christian Communities Several small faith sharing groups are willing and able to accept new members. Still considering being a part of a group? We'll find the group that meets your scheduling needs---call 354 - 406105. Diocese of San Jose Jubilee Celebration Don't forget to check out the information 'newspaper' at exits of the church on tlus special catechetical and liturgical event for all Catholics of the diocese on Oct. 28. Registration forms found in the newspaper -type brochure are to be sent directly to diocesan address listed. You will find a variety of topics and may chose the sessions you are most interested in attending. DATES & PLACES TO REMEMBER: September 28, 9:30am, Hofmann Center, "Women of Scripture" series began; October 18, 7 :30pm, r -Tofinann Center, "Forgiveness" series begins. Take Another Look Returning to active participation in the community? We offer all adult Catholics an opportunity to renew their understanding of the beliefs and practices of the Church today. You name the topics of interest, we provide the information. Call 354 -4061 \ ext. 35 and a T.A.L. team member will contact you. ST. MARY'S CHURCH Mass Intentions for the Week Monday, November 27 7:30am Linda Zucchelli + Tuesday, November 28 7:30am Peggy Best. Sryedallntenttnn Wednesday, November 29 7:30am Peg Kennedy + Thursday, November 30 7:30am Helen Marcotte + Friday, December 1 7:30am Louise 1prillo, 5perlal lntendon Saturday, December 2 7:30am Carmelites 5:00pm Antonio Alvernaz + Sunday, December 3 11/19/2000 7:30 am Eduardo San Juan + 9:00 ant Fred Callis + 11 :15 am Beverly Antes + 6:00 pm Paul Macierz + Parishioners PARKING NOTICE New Time Restrictions and Sunday Enforcement 0 0 ® @Now In Effecte As part of the Town of Los Gatos Holiday Parking program, new timed parking restrictions are in effect throughout the downtown area. Please carefully read the parking restrictions on the signs posted near the -)ace each time you park your vehicle to avoid ,.eceiving a parking citation. For detailed information about the program and the various parking options available, you can pick up a copy of the 2000 Holiday Parking in Historic Downtown Los Gatos brochure from any merchant, Chamber of Commerce, Town Hall, at Lot 4 from the Valet Parking attendants, or from the driver of the free shuttle bus. SERRA CLUB OF SAN ,JOSE Parents, Encourage Your Children: To develop their talents and gifts, encourage them to think of Church ministry as a possible and viable life choice. REPORT ON COLLECTIONS FOR 11/19/2000 Actual: $16,405.00 YTD: $31.5,358.99 Goal: $16,176.50 YTD: $323;530.00 Variance: +228.50 YTD: (7,171.01) LOS GATOS Schedule for Friday, December 8, 2000 Feast of the Immaculate Conception of Mary The church will be open from 6:30a.m. until 9 :00p.m. on this day 7:30 am Mass 9:00 am Mass followed by a reception in Hofmann Center 11:30 am Exposition of the Blessed Sacrament 12:00 pm Mid -day prayer and benediction 3:30 -4:30 pm -- Confession 7:30 pm Mass Rachel's Vineyard Retreat - December 8-10,2000 Struggling with feelings of sadness or loss after abortion? Still seeking peace months or years after the choice? You are not alone. Join us December 5 -10 in the Russian River Wine Country for a healing weekend retreat. Safe, supportive setting includes sharing, ritual, prayer, sacraments, and memorial service. Facilitated by a team of licensed therapists and others who have walked the Journey from pain to healing. Cost is $125 (no one will be denied for financial reasons). Registration required by November 27, Call Family Life Office, Diocese of Oakland (925) 680 -8510. Ask for Monika or call ext. 4 or obtain an information packet. All inquiries confidential. See also www.rachelsvineyard.or . On Saturday, December 2nd, we will be decorating the church for the masses of the Advent Season. If you 4 0 have an hour or two to spare anytime between 8:30 a.nt. and 12.00 noon that 00 4W day, we would welcome your presence and any assistance you can offer. We will be hanging the Advent wreath and preparing a beautif d worship environment for our parish. We would be pleased to see you and 60 grateful for any time that you could ® spend with us. If you can join us, please call Marianne McGrath at 365 -3706. We wish you a blessed and holy Advent. O V / EL I Di 0 i �� ♦ III/ TJ )? : pr .t jj. i s � , f q 14 • 0 cT n 0) (D (C) C� r� U. J l4 i bulgy xecj LLLLI—L i6_, l N c £8 2 { bulgy xecj LLLLI—L i6_, l . .......... — ...... .......b . ..—j — ..... ......... ,. . ....,t .. .. k--- ../ . "b" . — — 1198a t 4 ta, Lax C:at, , Calffarafa 950JO 40N.354,.I714 Online Giving Centennial Campaign Mass Times Contact Us 0' >( rn GS1 '. ally;..''' . Buh.nan 4a k4 {8 Pa,k 9 .s d, Worn. t. ,ra Pa � � 00 11 Main ut '(h r,1_n 02012 Goo01e - k,} S �� Map data 02013 Google - Vlew Larger Map Parkinq Information Download parking map to be printed) Whara to park } 9'_ at St, ry Ma'[ L-• and' a - aurroundins downtown porksny available In Lot Gatesl �/ ,�,��`. � - -rye i r�- •'•�� - ---�1 e Z St. Mary of the Immaculate Conception - 219 Bean Avenue, Los Gatos, CA 408.354 -3726 St. Mary School - 30 Lyndon, Los Gatos, CA 408.354.3944 Contact Us Search Site I Site Map i Login powered by eCatholic a division of WEBPRO PRODUCTIONS, LLC hx rd.(K 5./• - ✓fY✓✓ �e �]� 'Ir /A1R tT i 6 -Ow " 'l '�.• 3 =� ���'r' M' 21Ci 'gjeait Sfs LIttle, f:[Y C,71t 43 „LtzfICU)`Y[[� 9 fO3O-N '�Y� Y.��.�n. �s�;e: �,r`�t t'k. da >',.r ..�� - mp3.Lsitr3,•''`i:. Home About Us I Sacraments &Worship I Faith Formation Faith in Action Get Involved St. Mary's School � Resources I Search Site Directions and Parking Search About Us / Directions and Parking Share 0' >( rn GS1 '. ally;..''' . Buh.nan 4a k4 {8 Pa,k 9 .s d, Worn. t. ,ra Pa � � 00 11 Main ut '(h r,1_n 02012 Goo01e - k,} S �� Map data 02013 Google - Vlew Larger Map Parkinq Information Download parking map to be printed) Whara to park } 9'_ at St, ry Ma'[ L-• and' a - aurroundins downtown porksny available In Lot Gatesl �/ ,�,��`. � - -rye i r�- •'•�� - ---�1 e Z St. Mary of the Immaculate Conception - 219 Bean Avenue, Los Gatos, CA 408.354 -3726 St. Mary School - 30 Lyndon, Los Gatos, CA 408.354.3944 Contact Us Search Site I Site Map i Login powered by eCatholic a division of WEBPRO PRODUCTIONS, LLC IIS' MAM UNO ]3N]-d]-J]d Wj =r ----------- 51, 1 ... r7-- rl VI jl Ijllll zs Rim � Q. as L= -W -I jl Ijllll zs � Q. L= -W -I IP I': Ell Il ea o L= -W ... ....... AINO ]ON! I Y #z Ism afr -d H od Oil; N'il A M. R � 1'� 3 ;4 A� N 13 T toy Aw WOMM �M= 0 HH! IN 14.2, 1 fit"" W I a Igo ; Hi4, fi oil I 11110 to Ul 1811 MH IN it"s Not, R lip! I lag Amp A AM 2 li L i H5 I M m Rol s Ply r�\ 11 V o I O 1 V 14 I ..,d l W d ® J i I I ,j IY t'- r"�3 I AW " rfi" A1NO IONI�I-Jl� KJ I m IN ON September 10, 2012 Ms, Jennifer Savage TOWN OF LOS GATOS Community Development Department 110 E. Main Street Los Gatos, CA 95031 RE: St. Mary's Parish and School 219 Bean Avenue, Los Gatos, California SA Project No.: 10 -108 / H1 Steinberg ArC iq: ,,C 60 Pierce Avenue San Jose, California 95110 www.Stelnber.a.US.com E'C El Planned Development Application PD -11 -006 7'OVVN OF i Negative Declaration ND -11 -008 Pf ANl]flNd � �� �� A r OS Request for Additional Building Height / Response to letter dated March 28, 2012, ION Dear Jennifer: Please consider the additional responses in consideration for our request for additional building height as indicated on the Land Use Plan sheet A2.0. At the proposed new junior high school.building, we are requesting a maximum allowable height of 36' -8" for the following functional and aesthetic reasons: - Interior Ceiling Height: Additional interior wall and ceiling heights will provide more area for the display of teaching materials, exhibits and props, A minimum 10' -0" high ceiling should be considered for these educational spaces. Also, a 10' ceiling is more proportional with the large classrooms and library. - Structural / Mechanical interstitial space: We anticipate the second floor and roof framing structural systems to be approximately 2' -0" thick (TJI joists over glue - laminated beams). We also anticipate the space required to conceal mechanical ductwork, plumbing, and fire sprinkler utilities to be approximately 2' -0" thick. Therefore a 14' -0" floor -to -floor and floor -to -roof heights is necessary to maintain an interior ceiling height of 10' -0 ". [14'+ 14'.= 28'1, - Sloped Roofs: Demolition of 59 Victory Lane will eliminate the only building on campus with a more industrial, commercial, 'flat-roof' appearance. We are sensitive to existing campus and neighborhood aesthetic and believe the additional building height will allow for a more expressive building form. Architecturally, the pitched roof mimics the pitched roof of the existing, adjacent Lower School Building, continuing the architectural character of the existing buildings on St. Mary's campus. Existing Grade: The natural grade of the site slopes downward from south to north thru the proposed building site. The finish floor of the new building will match the finish floor of the existing lower school building due to the close proximity to the existing structure. This natural slope combined with the connection of new and existing floor heights is increasing the overall proposed height. Mechanical Well: Additional overall building height will also allow forthe incorporation of a sunken roof -top well for the buildings mechanical equipment. By incorporating a well Into the overall building design and form, we can reduce the overall height of the necessary mechanical screening element. While the existingjunior high school building at 59 Victory Lane is fairly 'low' at 16' -0" tall, we believe there is merit for additional height. The existing church is approximately 35' -0" high and the spire, approximately 50' -0 ", Other campus buildings such as the Rectory and Multi - Purpose buildings are in excess of 25' -0 ". Furthermore, the proposed building is more than 200' -0" back from Bean Avenue. As you know, the proposed site is along the service alley known as Victory Lane and will not create an undue burden or presence on the rear of these commercial buildings. However, we have stepped the second floor of the new building'back' to mitigate any tall wall planes in excess of One -story in height. 415.683.2000 San Francisco 408.295.5446 San Jose 213.629.0500 Los Angeles +86.21.3368.6860 Shanghai E I-ii1KY 7 September 10, 2012 Ms. Jennifer Savage Page 2 of 2 We look forward to your response and continuing our good working relationship, If you have any questions, I may be reached at 408 - 817 -3176 or via e -mail atjberg @steinberg.us.com. Sincerely, STEINBERG HITECCTS j Jeffrey T. Berg, AIA Associate Principal Cc; Teri Shepherd Tucci, St. Mary's Parish Enclosures; 1, A4.1 Building Elevations & Sections showing neighboring structures 2. Aerial Photo 3. Photos along Victory Lane looking East and West t lr 3. r fis�` r_ g w rp URI; t; h .rd r s. �•r, ss t Y rte: 1�, ��Y 1, _v.x.� brt 'i g ,�7+ C • t �r tS a� r:l�x� ;1 *�,�i���`I'�. ^k��,.,7� s l it n r iI ��Jr 12, 93j`2 i" ...i IM O�x�t�is:�, /• 7,j qTi jV � .ads .►,t -� �� � '�� ��� i._ 1rX ti5r r`t r ,3 s f a �riF tF � fy 4 -li- ---------- ir k7l; 44 ^� � \ © %� » ƒ /= . �\ ---------- ir . 1 ,1 tLS� ii. ng t yp 1 ##; - �•OZ � -_T L Sf { I 1 k. '! FA 1y t i f� 1 .fry j (fi fro,' 4 ti`�titil7 {1���! Nil S i, Ffi 33 ft p, II �� `! �I� �sl� � fry • � yr I t P= f ` ff I • , Fj 1 � ' £ S , 3i t` > CA i F tt�I LO s §/ Z ~�2 © CD I CD ai c 69;2 0- <F. ���� } }{/ `gym (, \ \\\\$3C a gO Q 1) 't z 0 \(i December 27, 2012 TMs. Jennifer Savage Community Development Department Town of Los Gatos 110 E. Main Street Los Gatos, CA 93031 ARCHITECTURE PLANNING URBAN DESIGN RECEIVED TOWN OF LOS GATOS PLANNING DIVISION RE: 219 Bean Avenue Dear Jennifer: I reviewed the drawings, visited the site, prepared an initial review, and worked with staff and the applicant to refine the design. This letter summarizes the earlier issues and the applicant's responses to the recommendations. Neighborhood Context The site is occupied by a large complex of church and academic buildings surrounded by a traditional Los Gatos resi- dential neighborhood on three sides, and by the small scale North Santa Cruz _venue business corridor on the fourth side. Photos of the site and surrounding neighborhood are shown below and on the following page. 00 LARKSPUR LANDING CIRCLE . SUITE 199 . LARKSPUR . CA . 94939 TEL: 415.331.379:) CDGPI.AN(i,)I',\CI3ELLNl.T okk1 l• ) L New junior High site (left) and existing Louver School Building (right) Existing )Multi - Purpose Building Existing After School Care Building Traditional house across Bean Avenue _217 Rce �m Avenue C>esi; {n Review (:or itac:n C)ccember 27, 1012 higc 1 a Existing Church Existing Howley Hall Adjacent office structure on Bean Avenue Traditional house across Bean Avenue CANNOiN Ui:SI(,-N GROUP M) L \l:I:`iPUR I-;\NDING i:IW ! F Sul If I'M . I.ARKSMA . CA W) ") } 1w 317 [lean Avenue Design Review Comments December 27, 2013 Pag, 3 Concerns and Recommendations 1. \\/hen I conducted my site reconnaissance, I was forninate to see the campus in full operation with students utilizing the large open paved space for recreation, and the parents later driving into the same paved open space to pick Lip their children. While this portion of the complex is rather barren, it is understandable given the many and varied de- mands on the open space. Still, given the visually harsh cluality of this eastern portion of the complex, which is in strong contrast to the attention given to landscaping in the surrounding neighborhood, it seemed reasonable to ask the design team to look for additional opportunities to acid trees and ground cover to the large expanses of paving. The existing and proposed planters at the base of buildings facing the main open space are good. In addition the applicant has added landscaped areas and trees in other locations as shown on the diagram below. The new gate and brick piers at the Bean Avenue auto entry will also much improve the visual appearance of the entry and parking area. New fence and gate are good P12Y5 hnvo hur. n nl'ian nee.! 4n 1 I kW I7 I 4 t l I 1 i{ 1 I �l LI� CFpj CANNON DESIGN GROUP 700 LARKSPUR LANDING CIRCLE . SUITE '199 . LARKSPUR . CA . 94939 _19 Rear ,\venue Design Review (:rnre,xnts December 31, _013 P.,);c 4 The proposed renovation of the Lower School Building seems modest and straightforward. I have no continents or recommendations for changes to the design. ,i. "I'here were a number of issues with the proposed new junior High School Building shown in the sketch belo-,v. Previously proposed new Junior High School Building Identified Issues: • While the design was relatively simple, it seemed to dcnv its inspiration largely from the Lower School Building, and did not relate well to the other more substantial buildings on the campus or to the attention to detail seen in the surrounding neighborhood. • The materials did little to mitigate the harshness of the very large asphalt paved areas addressed above. • The east facade presented a tall stuceo face to Victory Lanc whereas the adjacent existing Lower School Build- ing has a low brick wall facing the tine. The recommendations for the Junior High School building were as listed, and shown on the diagram below: • Pace the first floor on all sides of the structure, including Victoq Lane, with brick to rehire to the brick on other buildings on the campus. Enhance the entries by providing a more distinctive window pattern and wall cap at the upper floor over the entries, and adding distinctive lighting adjacent to the entries. • Provide a supporting beam expression at the second Hour line. • Add additional landscaping near the building. • Firm up the design at the edges to the north entrw access ramp. Provide positive Provide more contemporary ton can to wall winclow pattern to emphasize ent 9 T. MARY's SCHOOL I I„I Provide a supporting `_"�Ibeam expression Utilize Brick on ground floor including Victory Lane frontage Add distinctive lights to Refinement is needed here to define pedestrian emphasize entries ramp edges and allow handrails (if required) (Consider planter with integrated top for seating) Previous north elevation recommendations CANNON I)151(_\ GROUP iOO t ; %1�1:SPt)I: i.AiNI)I�I( CIRCLE SUI fE IT) . LARKSPUR . CA 9-19N 219 Bean Avenue Design Review Comments December 27, 2012 Page D I feel that the applicant has responded well to the identified concerns, and I feel comfortable with the �revised design, as shown in the currently proposed elevation drawings below. Currently proposed north elevation ........ ......................... "K j: -0 RA New structure will be here Brick has been added to extend existing wall surface ......... ...... ... ........ ._________ ______________1_____ i - - - - - - - - - - - Currently proposed west elevation Currently proposed Victory Lane elevation Note extent of existing brick alonq N/IctorV Dane --T-7 CANNON DESIGN GROUP 700 LARKSPUR LANDING CIRCLE . SUITE 199 . LARKSPUR . CA . 9-1939 "K j: -0 RA New structure will be here Brick has been added to extend existing wall surface CANNON DESIGN GROUP 700 LARKSPUR LANDING CIRCLE . SUITE 199 . LARKSPUR . CA . 9-1939 _' 17 Bean Amnue 13csign Revicw Cmiltmm5 "There was one additional issue inolving both the site plan and the design of the new Junior 1 -ligh School structure, and that is the height of the new building. The desire to access the new building at the same level as the Lower School Building, makes sense, and allows an rts). flow of pedestrian traffic for all, including disabled students. Although I believe that the height would be acceptable since the building would be positioned facing onto the lane open space, I die! looked at potential alternatives to lowet:ng the structure. However, I don't believe that there are any reasonable ones that could accot-,tplish a significant height redaction without major impacts on the floor plan (e.g., absorbing some vertical circula- tion to the first floor "vithin the structure at its south end), serious diminution of the design (e.g., utilizing all flat roofs), awkwarchuss in pedestrian flows (e.g., limiting disabled access to the structure to the north end of the new building), or subsrmtial additional cost (e.g., regrading and repaving a major portion of the central open space). Each of these pos- sibilities could have potential consequences far more serious than the impact of the slight increase in extra height. Should rhis increase it; bright still remain an important irue for which the above identified examples seem undesir- able, it seems to me that the other alternatives that might be explored would revolve around a reduction in the floor -to floor heights which could involve: • :\cceptance of a floor -to- ceiling height of less than ten feet on one or both levels. • Using other mechanical systems or methods of delivering heated and cooled air to the spaces through a more complete integration of ducts with the floor, roof and wall structures that might require less depth within the dropped ceiling areas. Jennifer, please let n:e know if you have any questions, or if there are specific issues of concern that I did not address. Sincerch•, C_1NM)N DESIGN GROUP Larry-L. Cannon CANNON DBIGN GROUP -'oo L ;i;K_;PUk LANDING CH4A I . SUIIE 199 LARKSPUR . CA 9d4 3o Deborah Ellis, MS Consulting Arborist & Horticulturis, Service since 1934 Jennifer Savage Town of Los Gatos Community Development Department 110 E. Main Street Los Gatos, C A 95030 RECEIVED January 10, 2013 JAN 10 200 TOWN OF LOS GATOS PLANNING DIVISION 219 Bean Ave., St. Mary's Parish & School) Review of most recent construction plan set received December 4, 2012 relative to existing tree protection Dear Jennifer: I have reviewed the plans described above and have discussed the design of the proposed tree well around coast live oak #63 and the new planter around Japanese maple #61 so that I have no additional concerns about construction around these two trees. It does not appear that any additional trees will need to be removed on the site other than those mentioned in my report dated October 17, 2012. In my October review I requested that the architects develop a cross- sectional detail of the tree well that is proposed around the large coast live oak #63. They have indeed included a very nice detail of this work on Sheet L.2, Detail #2, Tree Well Section at Oak Tree #63. The architects has also clearly explained in writing, under the Tree Notes on this page, the special treatment that is needed around the large redwood tree #65 (existing pavement removal) and planting around #61 Japanese maple and #68 magnolia, as I had requested. Regarding the planting of trees in bio- retention areas: You asked me to answer the following questions: 1. Can you plant trees in the bio- retention pond? 2. If so, what species? Yes, you can plant trees in bio- retention ponds, but it is not always a good idea. Whether or not trees should be planted in a particular bio- retention area depends upon a number of factors such as: size of the bio- retention area, expected length of inundated periods, soil characteristics including drainage, how the bio- retention area is constructed and other factors. So there is no blanket answer to this question - it "depends" upon the particular project at hand. These factors would also play into appropriate species for the bio- retention area. Looking at your proposed bio- retention areas, I see that they are between 6 and 15 feet wide. I also reviewed the detail on sheet C2.0. This detail shows 18 inches of sandy loam planting soil over 6 PO Box 3714, Saratoga, CA 95070. 408 - 725 -1357. decah @pacbell.net, http: / /www.decah,com. Page 1 of 2 EXHIN 9 x Deborah Ellis, PITS Consulting Arborist & Horticulturist Service since 1984 inches of Class II permeable gravel, then a 4 -inch diameter drain pipe with b inches of gravel underneath that. This is not a lot of soil depth for trees before you run into the drain pipe, so for this situation I do not recommend trees - I fear that their roots will clog the drain pipes too quickly. Therefore I recommend that you do not plant trees in this particular bio- retention area. I also looked over the plant species list for the bio - retention area and I have a feud comments on that. I recommend keeping the Juncus patens 'Elk Blue', which is a great plant for your bio - retention area, It can withstand long periods of inundation as well as dry periods. The yellow -eyed grass is alright, but it should be planted closer to the top of the basin, I'm not optimistic about the Mohonias though; I think you should remove those from the potential plant list. They are riparian understory plants, but in my experience they do not fare well in saturated soil conditions. The Agoponfhus seems out of place and also does not do well in inundated soils. Douglas iris will also not tolerate saturated soil conditions although this plant might do alright near the top of the basin. There are many native and non - native sedges (Corex species) available hat will perform their job better than the previous species. Sincerely, &4Pt,O_L Deborah Ellis, MS. Consulting Arborist & Horticulturist Certified Professional Horticulturist # #30022 ASCA Registered Consulting Arborist # #305 I.S.A. Board Certified Master Arborist WE -4578 PO Box 3714, 5arai•aga, CA 95070. 408 - 725 -1357, decah @pacbell.net, http: / /www.deccih.com. Page 2 o 1 2 Lll 6. tU N e� 0 o� 0 w+ c 0 U a iI• x it ?F iE 9E iF m h LO w L 0 N M N O ~ Q M 0 O U 4-- 0 N p 00 O Z O C Q. O ,U c U O N -O O N ] N L 3 C v0 Ui ¢ O ® 0 U LE p O -Q U . ) � 0) �,-4 n .l.( 42 .TS. L L : VVC; 0) O N �� C � ac,� LU co 4 ® CV LC O C7 ®; p N �,-0 N F -. O N Q E O M L N a) _N E O O -C Uc a�0aa)) V O 0 C a N C a) ' D a) 9 O CD Q is (1) O O C3 a) o O • V 0 Oo, _C O O N b � _ID .' -C ¢ 00 Ix O Y d (1) �C3 > N — O a) a -C3 a) Q yp O a) _ 0 -O O O 0 O C .0 ¢ O O a) E U N O s O- 0- 0 - D > U a) :...,., . :D U � u 0 0 >t0!O:_ D E N 'j O— LO N a) g E *° O U n V) U N � 0.0 a) •' c0 N 1.L 1[ — O ;•= C O 3 LLI v Q ° � � > N C j '0 C ®` N iI• x it ?F iE 9E iF 0 u 0 0 U ri .�s oI s r ME S O U d LO M i lid N 00 LO lai U O 0 d d rh M X 0 m O CL. v O O) C. O N H \ O V L cs a v- 0 3 Ol .a N a— L 0 T 0 m h LO w L 0 N M N O ~ Q M 0 O U 4-- U O Z O C m 01- U � c U O N -O O N u �— O v0 Ui ¢ 0 U LE p O -Q U c Q) U �,-4 n 0 u 0 0 U ri .�s oI s r ME S O U d LO M i lid N 00 LO lai U O 0 d d rh M X 0 m O CL. v O O) C. O N H \ O V L cs a v- 0 3 Ol .a N a— L 0 T 0 i c � tr vi .ti W [7 v 0 Z T) 0 m c A N C O U ti V ,4 J.� rs I n� p R 0 V S C7 u N "C3 3 3 - t S N C7 1 LO M to CNJ co O O LO Q V t` m x 0 m CL LL. v 4- 0 N d d a N 0 N 0 a 7 V d 0 Q 4- O N } N O Q T ECG G .(-: co d' Cl) M 0 {OP �! 49aXS+ N N co N M �;U Z •=c � W <. '� •' • a ' (emu h= 'C' ro (a w Y a) CL a) OL 0 O" c (n Lo 6 O roof a) 3 o a) o o U 0 U a) C C () U U .� N U .�.. m 2 a) a) C O N U1� y 0 !n U1 N U1'aY /!).0 Ua 4 r r C Z 0 I= "= C 0 C U C (u V i..) U a) ° a) ° V U7 U V C . 0 ' U U ro m cu .` (. m ca m ate) ate) v) co u) D D > d .ss = a) 1 r > t •r+ jU i (n L2 [2 r Q;Es E2 a) m o o ... P3 a a a 0 0 0 0 0 O ' 4 h. 5 Z jl :�Yi '_i. E!-1 Fi) 6c3 64 (f3 ar- C� CD d 0 n au�. e• 'm ro ro 0 ro u. u. n. u. rain ;ana }s (D (°c) � LO j�zi o be�.. ago (p are (O LO t- It I- d fr. v O ;CSCI co m ro ca m cu m ro ro ro m ro � a) � m a) m a) tea) zz cu ca M r- t�1s{ yt sT 4 ._ .-, 1 1 - .S;_,t `r' LO co LO r to _ co W) m LO R 0 V S C7 u N "C3 3 3 - t S N C7 1 LO M to CNJ co O O LO Q V t` m x 0 m CL LL. v 4- 0 N d d a N 0 N 0 a 7 V d 0 Q 4- O N } N O Q T ECG G .(-: N co p O`C am-' M a) •0 N O LO 7 O N N N m N + 4) a) O L r' 0' N — N W ° ° V N y F- ° '° ai d O a) a) � d CN 3 O (Y) i 3 m .0 '�'. � .N w C O ° dl t 0 i O — E C 3 °) ``° 0 m N C ° 0= fa a) CL a) O '� a) Z Q m O O O -o 0 m a) "0 .0 a N '� v M O Q } Z Y 0 a) m �c Z N r m a) -0 a) 27 U) 3 07 3 N N cn C m 0 0 0 '0 7 N O OC "0 O ?� O UO N +C •= �O O C U U ��m c a) y a 4- a�_�a)C o a. N g �. —c: m ° 2 N 2i ° L o��rnm m E N 'y > U U a� C: 0 E � C) n ° o° m� (D'oo o 0 aa) CL Z3 o U-o.- U E U n o 3 c c ro a o (C6 O O U O U A" C N 0 O 0 7 7 a E c) 7 E N S aS 7 = N in O O •«�.� C C "W O O .0 70 C U '.7- m C) 4-: e O m E 01 O .0 d I N N ° N C O C m m c= �aa ° o o �.SCL Q) UQ� m a) Lm 7 Lo dU g ° `o a 2 is 3Zm Eo`) m _ LO 3 Y�o> > > �°'> J 3 @ (n (n C (n _0 CO '0 .0 Q (0 a) O O O O ,C - O O tN o LO N O O -OD v� O CO N 64 62 O O i a) 0) v •a Lp J •C —J "O m O O O O a) J a3 a) A N C CV O O O 0 C- C: O N o=s�Lm.� C� m� rn� cu 7 m ro m LL m 0••3 X a) ICm L� u. -0 _ � a so ° c o O 0 a) •� 'Q CD ti 41 r COO 6 -0 >•. > 3 •C 3 U 00 C n m: N O co LO 0) !� O LO U a ew L •` .e 0 O � a) a) N C X O r CO m a) N '- 0 a) � m t 0 E E O ca d ri O M LO N LO 00 fl. c"L6 N (0 00 LO -C *O N O M a) a) o O N 'O a) Q� N m N w-. N O — C 3 1- m c 0 O a) mm 0 0 O 0) a) Q UN O) � 3mm °� °) �E rn En 00 O m 0 m >, Q �.., a-. 3 C LO O m a) _ co a) m O' 4- O C ro m ° o Y° m 0 E n o z0'o 0) 0 �o a) a = ° ° a) j E om C 0 � : O o•U ,o ar i >- mo ° m 4) Q) m > o� oo I om E CO _ nO Wm o (°1 ' Q o U 21 F- O I � � w c LU Q N a wd a O 0 6 0 Q a N e a U CIO ON .y �V L Ci O v s cs u Q} d } s i- v c o� s u d s 0 u d zs tv LO M N t` 00 O O t` O LO ON Q V d' M X 0 m O a. 4-- 0 c7 CL N O N O 'o of u N L tl a. 4- 0 3 N .y d ty +- L O L Q L tl i- U) vi L1J V Z U O S a'S M O m Q ar e a N c O U ;� �•rrr� 0 Old � o to 4 W Q 0 o A ® U m L_ N L a _ CL w a) �•, < L e a 0 -- > L ry _ / 0. 0 G_1 O O W � A C:: D LL C: ® E a� _ m E CL c o U � r- N M L a �- O rm O off. Q1 Ln L "O W N L O O ui �J •c b O �! H O a :5 O 3L� i �♦//q�' A�p��� �' a�i 1°— ° (A 0 Old � o to 4 W Q 0 o A ® U 0 O U 0 v N 3 3 d c u u c CL t u u N i\ LO m tt� N t, 00 O T O O LO O� Q V d' M X O m O CL. m L_ L UJ) _ W �•, < L e a 0 -- > L ry _ / c c 0 G_1 O O W 1 -o u C:: D LL C: z z a� _ o CL c o � L a �- Q1 Ln L "O W N L •c b O O i n vi 0 o (L) c u LI) Ly c O U U c c � � c > N vUi � O 7 +L O U o -0 N o .0 v o p i a Q N c aj p 'O U p +L-+ N O (ij Ln O V) o i N o Q V = 3 = i 3 m N N O2 O O C V C a) 0_ A N O B E ^ O U Q O N _ U-) a L O = U c O n. D ' n rl O n Q) N v_i v y U o N _ LU 'o "a o Q. P (D 0 U Q v a, Q (D 0 N 0 O U 0 v N 3 3 d c u u c CL t u u N i\ LO m tt� N t, 00 O T O O LO O� Q V d' M X O m O CL. N LU .c Cif O cl t }F✓. 1 3 U t O :C d,$ O A Q C N C O U N M `O O W Ly N h H I. W Q v r- N W W W W F- F- Q V) N Mr N W L Q N O ~ E N CUP � ) � '� H O O 2 O 0--00 �pZw N O Q Z5 Q 0 F W w LO LO CO N '�Y ';Y 'd' Lf) N m Conn m C O O Op` O � N O O O O O U C D a Q W Q W Q LO LO c'7 M Ol vi O N U o C � O p O U 'U N N ,Z h O O V � Q U N O O N C U N E O o O 0. 0 °4 O U C: �x0oO 7 O n 0 O O Lo N Q Q� :2 O M 0 o N n F J Q d L O\ M 4-- Ol O 00 M 4- N O _ � L � Q S ° L L=_ S LJ V "D C � d o O � U .F N L d L L 4 °s A d s O 0 c a N ? ° w U Ol cn 0- %. N O L 4- 4-. O -r cs i' � S Of L S -ty o � Q 8- U L ° S Q4- t1 O u cs 'C3 3 C3 N t v U N 'O LO M N 00 O d' O rl- O LO rn 4 U M x O m O Cl- f � .y ,V C� 3 U vi a � o N C O U � 1.1\4 p'.✓ p,.... -, - -.. t �1 '��1i::1 II{`£<ir`�Ni4�.<, !fM �% � �• Ch � ' I i 5�..i �..w�•�_----- % N d, i N t 1 I+ N¢a C-4 N lid , ,e`;It rq 'fit � _ t °y�� •%'ti � 11 �! 3!5 in ._��, ■MMy" +fit �4„` � 0 �� m u 11 INI, .< ~ f •••����'''������yyy^^^3 ..... ®. ,::`� Q ; Wl __l if P4 � rn'• P L I' it it LU N11— i __._— ....... _.._- _...___ -r "11711471nv NV38 d t~ IF I i' 1� �1 ,I 0 Q 0 O d a CL 0 u .c a U N 3 a U a >Z S a u i\ Ln LO N Lb 0 a 0 LC) Q U a O ti a N L a r, r` m s O t- m a o L CCa C L O 4- t° L O a. L O S ..... ..... cd 0 _Ea O " I-A CL .......... V IS 4 f4l; 4- u 1-4 SO W.r 1� ou LO 2 Ln N Pu In CY\ (A CIO LLJ CL kn CL Ll rlu cq i. CL 0 q- J i 4- LU uj DINK Nvas.. -fl LiJ f3 S1 c U 0 X i•+ N O Q c N r- 0 0 . 3: .y ,v c 10 a� Q C O 0) C C C_ � O Q3 � � O U O O N Q N N N N � O Q. � O O CID U U O O U W N � C rn U O O •� C � C � a �3 � � U O Q E U � C O O zj Q � � h iC Q O U O O � -U a C � � — O U O N Q1 i-- O � O Q) 'c Q) U) O D- c O N _N 4 O C N N O t- 0 c a� CD o 0 Q (� N -0 O Q C O ri U) O E C O Q o O O O U O O7 Uti _ j C p Q C O N U o om^`` � O Q L N vi Q LE O> U Q.> C U O C p O � N N p C3 O N o C) C1 C U O O C O N L c C O O- O U O L ^ c o m O E p in o O O C C C C W .0 C O N L u m '- _0 p p - j 0 U TNS V �- TO{ L r> v _N 0- LA U N N ,,, •� ° v 'LD) I- H- "- C C i > O F) N NO X O 0 y O O rn O% .0 O rro 0 E L O` y- Q) H c C o ' N i� w v a 6- N N( L O U C N Q 0 O O Q VI L o: 0-6 O c U a) C C N ® O z3 iL C /Q^�), W � �{ O 'O— Q) -E N O O N -_ N O O O> o i� U O� +- 'n p X S 4- �= a N 'a C O Q. 4- C z � i O O O Q N C O o > N LA a ° C3 � � U N - I- E o U N N v a N Q o p av)) O C N i t/> -� 1®• O O 0 fu U. ice-- -«-- O L W „ .E^0 (1) _ O O 0 L • • .� Q -� N LL 0 Q 0°” -r`�- i-- O _ U') m u s d U 3 3 S +- c d d n� V S d U r LO M H LCD N r- 0 d. O LO rn <C V d' Cl) x O CLm CL 0 0 0 M N O 7 O N O S L C3 a LA N 0 L 0 a d L O .n Q a\ \� 4 � | ! \ � 2 \ 0 / c / } \ \ a \ / < / \ ( 0 \ _» \ / 0 \ / 0 u 2 e� 0 a 0 C n b e \ / \ e 0 E } 2 §�/ O./ E o g � ®d \,E / 2,\ / 0 £ g °f2 _ 0 e _ \ E ƒ2/ % / \ \ m 2 » _ / \ 6 )Cƒ 0 0 $ / o #A :E 6 g /.\ \ @ ;0 0 0 k \/ k % [ $ \ 2 k % cn § ® / $ § '\ t ° \o t 2 ® / \ / ( 0 _ 0 y \ e & t ± / � \ � / ƒ � u ƒ / w y \ � # y \ § t / / \ � J 7 \ / � / J \ e > k o < ® / � \ / t 2 / ƒ p / / \ o 4 / \ LD $ewe o + 2 # \ CJO / -0 = R R \ 2 \ / t k 2 2 t & e O / / \ _ ( 8 \ a a R % � % \ ƒ D \ � / \ \ / / \ u \ % \ � . o �E � 3 co x ƒ / |= B B |\ \ / w VJ N LJ L. Z y N �L i+ U �L O 06 N O L Q Gl c Y N C O U y .V v. N 0) O � � L U O N � s O Ol f' tl U O s L tl N U N O O O O -a tl tl d d s C O � i- °17 `- o T- cJ o s ~ rn s o .s } o � 6 O � N L > V) � � OJ � s d }- 0 L O O o s � } s � o � O L � � s O U U Z U w a E 4-- } o tl c � d � N } s V) O = 01 � dl � C V) s 7 _ v- 0 0 L N _O O +- O U I 0 u s 0 U N 3 3 3 Q } } s } d u U CJ nd V i U N r- LO N O O O T) ON U Ol O d tl Sn d' m x 0 m O CL O V 4- d 0.1 rL rL O N 6 S CL iU 0 v } o CL t O .n aj cz 0 0 7E5 0 C) 0 4. 'o N" 0 O C: > > V) 0 V) Ln V) V) V) )I Q) "o V) V) V) Ln V) _0 V) V) C: Q) CL Qj E S: C -0 ci U 0 U X Lu tc V, o o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O LO 0 0 0 0 ON 21 'G) 'A .1 0 0 0 0 - - - 0 0 0 0 a) °°° o 0 0 0 0 0 0 C) 0 o Cj u- u- U- Li- LL 0 C) u- Lf LL. -L- LL LL- 0) C: — — — — — — 0 0 Lu +- N. C LM E CL :) a) C: CO. co (D 0 "r 0 m 10 co (n co 0, 0 0 0 0 ca C) U u o o 0 0 0 0 — — 'o 2 E E E E C)) N ::� - D a a a -a -a -a EE E D D D- 0 CL a -0 D- a E E E E E E .0 Z 0 0 c c -j F-T CC()C: OCCCE" 000000 C) 0 C: C 0 -104 D Z) 0 0 0 0 a C) D D D D C) C) D 0 U CU) UC) U 0 0 0 0 0 U 5, U U u C: O 0 LU m 1144 LO 10 N —2 — — — — N 0 0 C) 0 0 0 �2 :1 Ln 'o N w L8 0 C: 5 U 0 r- lu t(f am Q1 ,,.E v z'i3�t .L 3 U t.' O O Q a� N C O U ti .h y t1 0 U s d v N 3 3 LL } s } 01 C s d U "O M N 0 O I- 0 LO U tl Ol !] d d mot' M x .0 OD CL CL 0 0 n C CL i O N 6 s tZ LO } O } L O a I N 0 .9 L Q a ,0 0 a o jII 0 U p N > �I 1 — Vii. ff; C Etj p til 1.M t U Q � .. _O Q > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >1 f- a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a aD a a a a: :•' +`.y,.- •'- ..- :,`_..; to to to cn cn cn to v7 to to to N Uy vi to In N to (n to to Q to cn to to � U a �f 1yl Q. ei r U 0 . x ` j o 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3! r V ' o 0 0 0 0 0 J 0 J 0 J 0 J 0 J 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 J 0 J f t J - . O O 0 C�- o CD O O 0 O O � O U O ° `_ _ �'•O _ CL O O O 0 � _ O O a L a LL a L a L a LL a L a L a L a L a L a L- a LL a L a LL L L L a L a L O D- LL a � UCo.s ! 2� C N _ Di N r- 1, N N M O d 10 M ^ V -^ - C�_ O � 00 O � � � ' � N �c U U U U U U U U U L U .a c U U 0 0 m Y a a a a a O O D>> O O>> O 0 0 0 0 0 0� O a o a U m >>> a � a� � m > a a o a Q_ c c c c a o a c c c c c c c c a. a s a s a Q '� U. 3 0 0 O a 0 0 0 0 0 0 o o a a a a a U U U U U U U U a U U U U U U n D U U U U U U U U :. ' N Cl) LCI N ,o N o0 C� O N M et Lo �L— �o N c0 0, O N M `T i dl N N N N N N N M M M M M M M M M 1--- M — vt t- �4-�t- v I• d c1 Cfi cT t1 0 U s d v N 3 3 LL } s } 01 C s d U "O M N 0 O I- 0 LO U tl Ol !] d d mot' M x .0 OD CL CL 0 0 n C CL i O N 6 s tZ LO } O } L O a I N 0 .9 L Q N ca O N t_ C l NiU OW f� I t U O S N �L 0 Q rn N 0 U U O U S d N 3 3 S N c LO M to N UJ O 14, O O O\ V d Ol O d L Cf M X O m O CL O V O co OU, d 50 O N .-i 6 S a d += L v 0 CL �L L O S L Q O .., �..,. Q i j O CO U a O O O O O O U O O U U �0 U j > '...0 — i i E G +-- .- '1 N I 4) > O O O CO O O O U U U U U U a o u > > > ; j N N N N C3 (1) N N N N C5 0 N O O O N N o o 0 a a o a o 0 o a °cz' °' oN C) I U C N E N N o u o;' to CL X m o o 0 a o o w o 3 3 3 3 3 p p 3 3 p 3 3 > > > > p 0 U O O O O O O O O O J O J O J N (n N V) N V) N N _ H I C O O O O O p O 0 0 0 O y O 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O 0 U -0 O -0 0- O O CL to O O i O O, �_ L �_ `_ p O 0 0 U (? O L O LL LL O u_ U u- O L � LL LL LL u_ IS_ u_ O LL O LL LL �j — n O O _ _ Ln P ri O NG\i' 10 LO r\ f\ lo CO O _ Y N N N N N (-D (-D U U U U v U U U U U O E E > >> j> U U D D> j 7 7 > U O o p p O N N 0 2 o O p O= T= o p d U 0 0 = j O ..0 C C C C •.'_ ••! v'_ C C C. C C C •«'_ = O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ° 3 3p 0 0 0 0 o ro 0 o U U U U U U U U U U— U O U S d N 3 3 S N c LO M to N UJ O 14, O O O\ V d Ol O d L Cf M X O m O CL O V O co OU, d 50 O N .-i 6 S a d += L v 0 CL �L L O S L Q LLl G S3 CJ F Y1 VA N 0 C6 N O Q c w 75 N c O U ti N O is o a' c o O i`•_ U C O G � u o a > O - N > O > N > N O N N O N N N E m m a > > > > > > > > a a a a a a a a a a o ,u ° Q m > G N s > >' O x x Lu t% O J 0 J 0 J 0 J O J O J O J O J O J O J O J O N CO i - .N 9 N , J`s' XiA C C A •.5 i O X X O O O U-1 O o O O CL LL LL. U- LL. o U- 3# ,, LQ {; O O v7 co `O CO V` co t\ 10 'V' N N N C Q— i � o a, E E 0 c E E E O a O N a U U t c E C C O C C C C .� •c D Q o a o a a a a a Q O O O 3 o I r o 0 o a a o a a o a a o 0 I I I U (D co ''•' U^ O N M V b N e0 C O `0 d,, 'O t0 co .�.; .ti i L 5 F V/ w M 0 V S d u d 3 3 3 a. s i- c u 0 d n� V S d u d "O LO m N 00 Q Q LO Q V d rn 0 d LO U) m X O m Q Q 0 0 N rn 6 CL Q N d A N L O CL. h d L 0 i 0 n. d 0 L 4 N 0 .o gill; � N 7 U O 2 05 N .i O a c a N c O U fil. rOk C O C C c C C I o° O �U `� O h _ 2 � C C C C C C C U fil. rOk C E _: O U O z a� U N N F`- N 0 U 0 N LO N O a O O O _O W C N E O U Q� N E 0 U s u U G r 3 o.. s d c U a s U u G TS LO LO N I O mot' O r` 0 LO rn Q U d a- O U N O m s X o cn O Cl. T L O O a G z O 1] C c C C c C C I o° �U `� 2 � C C C C C C C U U U U U: U j > V tO tt (n G.'tV i ll.l N N N N N O N N � O > \x h ii.vh > > Q) > q) > Q O a r t o o O t � Lo C C 4j fO .Zr > O Lk. O N O O O O O U O M A ,Np v� N M .�.., C E _: O U O z a� U N N F`- N 0 U 0 N LO N O a O O O _O W C N E O U Q� N E 0 U s u U G r 3 o.. s d c U a s U u G TS LO LO N I O mot' O r` 0 LO rn Q U d a- O U N O m s X o cn O Cl. T L O O a G z O 1] I t. O Q.1 N d N O a` o� c Y N C O U w O n ti 4- O h CL E" V e H O1 - T TC 2 O U s tl U N 3 3 d } S. c d U d -C3 t" lLi N co O qt' O O lP Ci d V ci N O O }U N L 6 M -C X O L CO tl d C) h d T L U +- tn L 4-- } L } L 0 cn to 111 cr) O a� W � 4 'g b+ N .O U O S w N O d rn c N C O U 0 K- O M O C � 7 ,U O o � U C d O � N 3 `o Fes-- t N 'a 6 O d � U N O > O :o I u� Ln N C) •� op N � U O U � r O O N O` � O U C1% i U � � O � M N X C O O CL c O L � r L C o � N O C)I Q Q 11 E c M D 0 n. a70 O 7C3 ,. c 1 N E O (� O ^�,, ))�� W V a � U 4m ,C N O O O w m E a) z via) c O a a�i ao N p O N Q CL u E m -Om i O 0 m U Z 41 c (D U U O x O O Q e LO O .; C u 0) N N m C: a� N' U o CA O .0 >. C: CL > N 3 0 C) c 2 U n` C y O (D W a a-- 3 c O v O O C9 c Q N c n O N H O ® U O G g O "m _N O i O p w O Q n O N N X j — U E c O O O 0 O c N N O > n 3 O O ". p U I O Q) O O W O ' Q ® E X N O X W S• 'e- N O 0 • -u V 8 N a j W C r M p N C V U N a) O O (D O O 0. W = W .w a � N Q fn > O C O O O N a O -C= N U .- d 0 to O O ® 9. D- Q) O -Q 1 C O • Q 0 a) .6 a > N x Q 3 4 Q 0 0 O 4) O d O °_ O O — fn a) N O z Cl o _O p fn C 10 O N 0 C N a� v c L a M O J O 5, > I (L � 0 K- O M O C � 7 ,U O o � U C d O � N 3 `o Fes-- t N 'a 6 O d � U N O > O :o I u� Ln N C) •� op N � U O U � r O O N O` � O U C1% i U � � O � M N X C O O CL c O L � r L C o � N O C)I Q Q 11 E c M n. N N S c a � c a w m z c CLN � c E m -Om U (D m c m m C: n- N' U E CO N U n` W ® > =W W X X X X X W W C r M p N .w N N Q N M Ch N ,O CL m � cu � O Q w c L a M O J O 5, > I (L � � -J m I Cl) 4c x (J) ,;3 O O O a, 0) U m N cm p g m " O O G ` �I i NZ3aEo•a -a, w.ciaa`(D �cn 0 K- O M O C � 7 ,U O o � U C d O � N 3 `o Fes-- t N 'a 6 O d � U N O > O :o I u� Ln N C) •� op N � U O U � r O O N O` � O U C1% i U � � O � M N X C O O CL c O L � r L C o � N O C)I Q Q 11 E V/ L11 Z. cu O S2 O Q 'L w U O cjS N 0 E rn C N O U V o_ N O o — .Q — c O N N C "- '� C Q N C � O U C O C � O � U � Q O 3 N c 0 U Q 0 v, O � C Q O _ n O U O C O O E 8 � � N � � dl N C N � U � � O O.O � Ln U U G O N � U p O O N r �- C O O U c � � _N :D O Q N cn r � O � � U U _N ,O N O v a R- R U r_ u U d CL u u d "C3 I-- LO M N O r O n rn Q U ci rn O d O V' M X o efl O CL 0 �r O sr a O N d S d n. ,T a 0 L 0 a L O L Q c m a N E N m (n ca O z o E 0 ro c C a d J d J L 05 X Z LU W w X X X X L r:LLJ Ln L6 C� J J U W Q N N r N C a �•o � � C N O Z3 cu Z d N W O J Cl. 0 is X d (D > L nc Cl coca X � �.° � za 06 L 0 () (n _ o C�.f N Q U) 7 ma a C o a ag o+cL. a 0 � ` �a,N:r ra m e o o m ro c m —° o MLC�(n0 ca EJWiJ o_ N O o — .Q — c O N N C "- '� C Q N C � O U C O C � O � U � Q O 3 N c 0 U Q 0 v, O � C Q O _ n O U O C O O E 8 � � N � � dl N C N � U � � O O.O � Ln U U G O N � U p O O N r �- C O O U c � � _N :D O Q N cn r � O � � U U _N ,O N O v a R- R U r_ u U d CL u u d "C3 I-- LO M N O r O n rn Q U ci rn O d O V' M X o efl O CL 0 �r O sr a O N d S d n. ,T a 0 L 0 a L O L Q O w N U O N O .Q a` C 75 N O V .y ,U EAE w u,,j+ W uj ^) f- CV 00 N C O U � C � �N _O Q 02 C Li Q) Q) Q U -..pF, N O� sw Zd10 .. v co M c� a V O lil Y N, —� �rQs i X I ate it r«rA { f r O sk 3 W } . t�l LSiTc�R t 1. tai ti env g a 1} Ps a 8 N o = o 3 Tx R4 , x 3r{ AY 7+l�St {ll, r��tjr0 it, tSf`k � el s�f[i S r tt 1[}ik t�� il`zl rlU� {�%i ;l N di (D li > U O 6 V' LMOT`$�'IaYc )t ';,TrJet�i;x +dxt' l r t1�zt ra 1 y 'Ir I`��j O <r O v O <r o O O o ky�w L M Ln zw- tli v O Irbt Wit �.§RFX }; ` 0 LL- V V oMKT aAn }�n��s z ° °00 O of O O LO `sib"5e'�!F',.rt- �`,?lvt'zsz# Zen �N `� f .# t hr -ape LO + 03 ,� Ol N 1� \ CO - a co in �. H O �U U U u 2 QU G7 E 0 LIN C14 m -IT CD LO 0 O 0 0 a Cl n F O s d U a a S a 1r a E) E) 0 a i C} U a LO LO N n ao 0 O r` O LO ON Q V &I o O N O V' S` X _N O L CO e CL O CL L CO G L- C) 4- L 0 d a i 0 Q t" N LLJ O/�•� eLa{ O w s .T try 7 :1 P, O N 0 sa C O U y 0 �' dbti 8If1 }af1J�S' . 0 O O O O O t LQ> y fi5r , JO�IA� 1 � 00 00 � n O T ° - CO LO N N N O N 1ta ;�t�j{ ft7�N a �i�tt 31 7 tt N N N uiil t",7 �y i' 10 O O N LO O uaG M4�4'"�y�aJf f+W gty!C.v'p tl, vM 11 z r 3t. 07 lPb2"�� 4 JEf F�sQ t iU�43i Fi }} yin M C, f 41r3 . � }. ri } Ir: l O 10 O d' dJRA!,%iN,"R(Z ib ?�i j iAi, y $25isi C2 v � O O 1 f4���i i - O 4W (1J ;1 A _ 19 a l n) L N C C N n) ` _O y M1�{y� ?s tri J Yi( O n O CL C_ O O C C O O +ti >�fh +la ��tO x)nivi4� Y O O C _ 5, O O> O O O N O p O y }1! fFn. n.r;•aS)X 1!�f U .+^ = U U U S 0 V s O V o� 3 3 Ll s O C O U Cf LL 0 u U d 'O LO M to N h OD O O LO ON Q U d 0 O d d d' M x 0 m O D_ O v 0 -O OJ d IQ. O N 6 a rt O 0 L O CL }. O Q ZdlO ju Q F FIedX9 ..'I'v M M v v v v MBQXe� Y O � ` C ! `� c c O ? O v O O 3 O O O' 6 6 .3 ` `& O t to U F F O O U) _T > > i > _ a .� U n n) O O i J N C C C: C O O c O N s ,pxry tic � �tx ;fit• k i O !Y � t �Z�` }�� Q Qi i °1, " rf ztPk ° I i o o f F,a "Y' O O O O U U O O i i J . .4�; O O O O O O O O O O O O O ant -WJ �2a i p O O p p I O O O O O imd�'ef�'!i O O L L c Ol 0 00 co t I S 0 V s O V o� 3 3 Ll s O C O U Cf LL 0 u U d 'O LO M to N h OD O O LO ON Q U d 0 O d d d' M x 0 m O D_ O v 0 -O OJ d IQ. O N 6 a rt O 0 L O CL }. O Q W ca 0 N Kf a N a U It 0 M 0 E rn a N C O U Q\ V u O V t O u N 3 d 4- -C 4I c LO M N O Ir (D t` O LO QS Q v d' M X O CO Q CL 0 Q' 0 O d d CL O N {6 C S 6 d N _T tl U) L O L O !1 t O 4 -- to M O` N i. .N K ibis C14 co C14 LO i JL itt�$k 4 } {f tiU`Yi +-f {rF -rj +oY k}Ntf th3 0) ;tf�F>i ?5+ iii N Q. a���� V) vl p N U C C .o D o C > > O U) Q O Q% m r 0 U Q _- 0 U Q ._ U w. gg 3Ff ` tt i �A p!f Y ?lySM-1. X411 M1t O i3 N ) ) G', f 9� �Ci ��uzciYJ w ii � - a {��a�t O O N O 0 ^ o 0 O O O O J 0 o J >r {k gg� tta3 j' T5Y { Yt� 7 s'st{ Sgt t Tii #'fu�tt'ka a t4Yi.�fi, CO •— N Crj N ,— � i�...............s �r;r+ai# 4c s�rt�� M N t 70 -0 L`kt }(lam y"`y aQ #Sz�l '� •` •`—' �10� �10� �f0� LL LL. +, tZ1� O 0 LO LO 0 CD 00 LO P*l A. �U �o6tn, °0 °0 LO ° 0 0 O, 0 00 Y45 ' S s& iasy MEN t 4 t ji `f dl a y4�5,,- ;`.,�5�af T. O ' N LO 00 O. CN 00 O O O M tS SiVl4 "ilQ.jk f� �xQ O ` h U to to i Y N_ Y Z �$y51st O7 O7 U G U U U O V t O u N 3 d 4- -C 4I c LO M N O Ir (D t` O LO QS Q v d' M X O CO Q CL 0 Q' 0 O d d CL O N {6 C S 6 d N _T tl U) L O L O !1 t O 4 (f) ai N Ctf b h r�? ggini�c�F# t�` %i 3 t N a a Z C16 M k. O C to r- 0 U v V W Zd10 I r. {�n I (14 I L� ,O c� O H8gX5 O� Q w 0 y M v I t� v U') o j t�-;a� b,� NBgXE c� co co M co f. -o t N D a o v, N 0) (D C O N , O r! (D N N vN N p N 3 N N to C U {n > O O CO j E Z O .� O C N U U O O i +s O O N 'W C C O O C U C D U .X ,O Y N i s C t� 1;(CO)i, -p .O . _ ! c c r _ U Q .O C> C i C t§ C O N U 2 O U ,- N n U -- U CL' a zr F ' r r �5 1 .FFf` 115(, P J,i1 Jlki {t�t}✓ r} �I .rtr {irPy Frbi tix's+f i 5 �� t•(•i O it[� ��I rib ti.}r,r �yi 14 c E 4hc { jyb�i' V �x�t�yY r xn N N N N N N > N > •y ?4s; t;4 tQty f +! t t > > > > > >.`ts '` !r U a c O d3 s 1 r 3 O O O O O O O tg z;_ _ h�' !•f} h4 ePr b4 �w� at tln s; i tlS`Cf .Q a+nd =4itr sS i O O O 0- V ItOn� V r }3� t � i?N a tr let 1i�31dr i L ,` � � •,_ U-- F�'�F� �M1r15 ciin���l�$r Al O O O O O LO O O +x7;t JO IA , �QO J � i � r q A �t Yya r s sr N O c0 LO N LO N . {,w �a>; .?fa , 1 ]`'�rr_f.,v' d° t +•' O Cl LO v O to O (N Cn O O 3`FiSYy�,iiS�r7�11i C n� �IQiA�rlk,St'�C{i x O f.' ,' C c 2yrftn C O p U C OU O O x ? ~ O U U Q _ cq C14 -� U 3_ co N (14 0 u s u d 23 R N r- LO M N 1` co O O r• O LO Ol Q U O 61 O d LO v= n M X O CO O d. O O 00 CLO c, a O N T s .N a �T L d a-: L O ♦- O CL O Q e7 N LiJ c*J O sr y U O S N `o L Q �i C N C O U q. x C 4 ti +r °WtZ Z H9,QX5 ,.!� to M N r1' MIN N N M i HEa E { : 'O co N I� N N r- N k *ai i2L_yt Ow A i MM N t ja �,{�rat*� ;rS iJry�4 lh+ ,ri 1u41(ut+ r i1 O N O O c 0 O O a- +',1 4t} D ,O > Q O` f -Y4{ tyx fi ?; �r �1T o Asti1f1 j + "V` Q o4S3.'`t13 O o O to > N > .f: 7 yf� z'Y 7 Zt} c O n c _ o n c O O C O a c o O c O i kit b +nr t+ "st 3t Y ii O N .. ' O O O N O L_ C u C :.t• r rJni, � t ?,^ ra }�_.r,�'1t>,t, f�1 � 3 N O N N N O N N N O > > > > > > > > > > $t Ft,{� t.#'. y O O O 6 O O O O O 6 rri to cn to cn v� rn to cn cn of #yn %rr },� r j t" " f�t��,_ Pf 1p. j� k`FYt X C i fk5 ' ' L; tom' I O 47 3; `�3j ? j�? kSl >3 r 0 Q O 0 O O 0 O O O O O 0 M N p O 0 CD OD O v, ni f"-in a7• 10 \ LO cF*��'M r Ott d "-o ` fin °rr in� fl yx 5tc y O O `- O O 0 CL O p CL- O LL LL L U- U- LL 0 LL- U LL- LL_ LL 2Jft }Jn1�S ` - O LO O O 10 O ill O 0 0 0 O o Lo LO O `O LO OO O 00 to. C0 O O O O ? OJ OD tb f 4!F$4s;i,t+�t (F N tIa'llow O co O O to ()0 - ..aa"�"V s 3 zs + ;tiah�,t7 �nk��tl� ��'•� �'� � t N * * N * t * - M O CO 1-t' 10 -O M <Y T`n p ..''f O O O O O O O p O qi t o 3 �C� a 4 yar' > N > > > U O > Q j ;Cl Ejlt Vn} s�z N X C: C C N O O O O L O O o o U o U c� U v ��r a $Fa2JJ }x,4a i ?:_,t � �:�5,_i, ��•.; _apt ; ".��N o N I ao - IL N- o. N o II M M N M M v M u) M 0 u d u N 'O 3 0. u cs d s U r` LO LO N O O O In ON Q U C7 rn 0 d d M X O m O CL O �Y 4- O D` Q 6n O rL 0 N t6 G i CL LL T tl L O 4- L O R N .o Q t s . 3' `ff k1 ppJ c O W N 't. a U O x CCU N .p A d C 0 C O U y OQ W.. Zd..LO HEdXS M h. _. ,gyp M co M V' f�•' . H �`na M t „❑ HgGxZ _ Y U U U O O ti;t lirlrt- t tlr 1 ; U O O O � r f � tl /= 1 {;Kea v V U U U tk d1 i 3r�l F a I{ rI it fF O ZJ .0 O O O OU -C t ty 'xT{ 9` b t 51 C to O C C C F� • }soy 'C31 `f,? .� ;,1�.}.,rxi.. f..�.r.�,�.�.; o �� U U: U (�: ll'�.gl tci -,1f t3 Sf j'SZ ti:it t > 0 �J �C �<t El "j O f(icri� jti 'M, -P, (D a) a) di W > > > > > > > 0 ail +rn �.lr'TIYf ° ii-`s Ij t i J1 t5 17;C n a rF J r'•tJ �S t d H � Sylz'r � k�{,S i i'• yllid'4r a rjpy #,,�i t`:r. nz7a]{ O O O O O O O O tf, '4' t ek'R'I v �YSygC i. NN3r t O O O O O O O O ?!�•yt,tfE,Fkt3'Cf{ 1 O °° v c co v -It o 10 co 10 fh1i !A b? tot n sl O a Y _%2 ?t Yd t #tv -d }n5 iFl};tj O i31i�Y(sn c .Q O O 7 i r 'yrj o\° ° C\ i {.¢ts`fz ��fNz�3lfl>�itC �� ,� .L O O O O it O }ir LL_ U U O L O LL O LL. Ina S- 1 o O O O O v O 10 O co O d l�zt •O f l: : r .O to Z 2 _� y'J O yhri r7 IO�IAf O O Ln O O O CD O� %O S }u t.Fl� }� F r"t S� �s t fiklfy5 f o O Ol O •- O �- r�)Y Apr 91 lrf Iris .itity tivc k i;: %>f +3:'SV7i Ol + N t O a 00 ^ O V' N t 10 y; (�L. SH P ?) A� p (Y) 1 hr iR,l 1 pile �` K L4 rC C 'O C G O D O D ti_vj� O. o x u O 0 t3 a a O 00 q) •C C •C C r Y, oa U D 33 O �� 0 N 0 O 0 O 0 O a N N= O .Fri U iJ Q S� U. `) d. U CJ U U U U U O N M F l� O U i u U ti i7 3� 3 d i d u U tl CL Q) s d U f\ M LO N r O ,G. O O In rn V d o, 0 d V/ M X 0 C13 Q d 0 4- 0 0 c Mi 0 N v S• d CL i CS U) O v- i- t, 0 d O 4 i 1 1� f' i "PA �7 r �t `rT4 I O G Y N s Y s T co N 0 Q e N e 0 U O ;- w ZdlO r? r> v �r !� (I v c (Y) O. O. ; M Ch V V' M 00 ;h4p�, ridr p HiOXE .. I N N N N N L I iF nlY x i6 t i 13�N�t1�a1� � IA t� 1 •�) � Y 'C �O d � I (3 (3 C l gs? . } }kr i 4x! Z F s dt c C O C c•� c I I C � O— O V I O Q) O U. U v} _ U U ti' t Mit I'm m�9 111 7v -$� � RJR q! u { lPyt O N N N N N N N O N 1 trr Sla } �}A'{}9dJ` \Urif �gS i 0 C3 cn 1n �p err ��T�Y��i4�'yly �3.1 iFS N r�Qq )i 1 a � m ME'U er� x �t ai .y.�Q•� 1� �rj1 O O O O > O O O O ��ya4� } €� 1 }rxut eTY 3 q 0 0 0 0 O O O O O � kjS s3 1} }Y1C i zl�F 2•zi ! ^ N C I N b9- � co S^, M b9- 5:�,1L`rYY.. U .ia ifs Sae£�At,zt�c Y,Lt� 7 } "ly4ange.�``SS7fY,Y`: y.,f hH Fla .� Q ` I j`'r Lm'fiy 0 10 O LO �10� V €r} rl V O tl V O V O O �IO� V O d. O LL O U- O �Ot t r 0 O O O O n O O O €f) '. ^O 0 O+ 00 N � C si4N xFP-141L rs � H 1;4 - .yry.t�jCiyg�, 21�y3t��r :F�� 00 c0 10 O �O c0 N O N O o 00 00 O � F� ' t}'! co c0 €(-)cli Lr) 0 CD 10 #rU! rE ifs } Ci �;r , �`�� v a };r b ,�z ��y� O O c O c O c O c 13 c O c O c � .,! c .,! c .,! c } {}rQ O }Z #} •c O O O O p . O p p O > N >> O ,n O N N O O 4} O c, 4sS•h• t t ?r5 , a ,•�-Si'�`1.,�..- U O D U U O D U U U' U O U o U o •¢ N N N Y t i '.- Z "iit �t - t n}rtkr, !# aalj f' ; -j vl CY €n '� — 1° �� V u� O— b I N ILV� LO eY O 4- O N CS C 0 U d U N 3 3 +- +- s C N a. s b r� N N O O LOP 0 Q V 0.1R9 CD p N IC M t X O L CO Q O O C L O L 0 a d tY +- O Q V/ ITJ tti3 0 si Q) 0 �Y 3 °3 � � S a 4 O :L o�S 0 .fl Q G N C 0 U y U 0 ` yw o — Zdlo co ) v M M ! I U Z Q H9AxS N 04 M N co tt) 'O a Lq N> p p N NCO p N N �O p N 4) C � O N 1 N C p C: 0 N O N O O O N C O E C N ' t,i i a�-• I' r, C N C C N 2 C O` w N C •U N Q p i p U N o` ,O U _ O U .�, o U �- 1 lt'to� E C p U C E U C E U A. I t s, J) et S' 0 0 N 0 0 O C N �- O O O C N C C O O N O C �'.. C C 0 N N O O )7 P •'' ai4� ,qt x 0 i N Z .a7a3 a>✓�.�!W 4f z 1 r C C C O O az U U U �1 > > > 1 ON W,((nnU fl tfh{ 7Y �4 f ;�R_ �31 %� i�tfi.i2a�t3'i x�Yti� it•Y L N � O O � _ i )1 if ,id -A�,� 1 F'' '} bq- J -•t1 S t f$� r i ]a3f f thi}LfMY . '�4i17Cy:� J } lYk C i`pi�i O O p tL. ti 2 LL -- :��t�i S a1n }f1a }S 3: z 0 .__ O LO O 'IT o L10 P41,.0 i ao6jn O o O 00 O 10 O V) O LO 4 flt4 t! j o v v y {t' i j yy// r �, s,2r•,i55i 3 iih 47 J, 5r r L rn o1 10 Cl) 1 jai{ t ilixTT� #fl,T 4 7 �9 ;1 1 'j ..7` `O ?r r- ,I qg;;+ q N N N N AI die ") aYr ?�1 i vY�z s� 7 7 C q F �Y ;JiS 1 2 O L O L U U Ln ' LO U U I n U u LO ^ U U co U U 01 ,:Palk- 51' r= f 0 U s O v 3 R. t N c U CS 0_ S d N 'O M Ln N co O d' O In Q v ci 0 0 d U) M x 0 m Q CL O d' 4.- 0 �i N N G7 O O N a S a N T O t L O Q } 0 R N iu ca Q U O X 06 Y N 0 E Q t7 7 N C 0 U 1 (1) O Z Q) a) 3 0 O O N co o � 0 0 LL- LL- C\ 0 0 1 00 00 N O O j O � c O C N O O O O Q U O m a 0 Uv < 0 -. C) 0 � m ¢ Q _ —_•Lo 01 O 0 a) 0 (D-2 0) N + Q) v 0. 0 UO �-.. 0 � i C O _� -C O C Q O) U 0 0 N O) C N 7C) N C .n —_ O O a) O '3 O o a 3 C O 0 a) Q) -C O N 7 O N U — N '> �oa�m 0— U3'- �3 Co a)_a,� 3 C c a0i Q c O a) m � •T- L j �� �~ u 6 6 U� Q) i 4� c1 U O a) > a) M o U O' O Q 0- i (D 0 O 0)0 O o� 0 0 0 n n Q N -0 -C O 0 O C U U 3 Lq O a) c .�, O O C7 0 =O •QI c LD) -0 � U -0 1 O O 0 O I � a 0YE3 �oc� Et�C: O C O EJ-- m 0 a) N a) N LO > O Q p =O 4 O �0 aj > > O U O v) � Q i O� O� � a) O (� N O � o C E 4 �°QC) a o � o °� o} 01 o`o S °� -0 a °�I a ? 0) 00 00 0 O N E pi o C: u -f- 0 f �o0 'X-L o� —o =° 0) c, 0 c: O) O_ — � �o a) E •- O D •0 O : 'O C a) L E U N C Q O h Oj -0 O N O Q C X 07 O N Q O— O 0 0 LO U' 0 0 w (D (D p 0O O a C n 2 a) n U 0 0 0 ~ N O O _ o m �. >— Q O cC 0) oLO a O0) a pi Q 0 3 E - �--- c X 0 0 N i C O O (c): C O U N T O a) C] 0 O O a) > 01 () n O a) a) N � 'C � C - — c D O a U o > O O O ` c: o Q 1 f O 0 C U O O O O U O a) a) O O> U 0) U ri S U U E -0-0 O' t ri X 4�1 tgY"3 3� axe( S `f w m o O v 4- 0 n N G1 0 CL fx 0 .r 0 U N 3 II c u 6 0 u U N LC ) m LO N r` co 0 0 0 lf) rn v � N CS1 o O O O In � 6 M X 0 0 m a O cn 0 V) 0 y- 0 n. N 'L 0 4 0 co N H84X£ v > N N c p ,O r 'YK c O o Q N Q N C .a 0) °' O -C n U p c"n r t t {; i,{ s f Z = 0 U Z 0 y N Q i N ,tI , 1 N '� N O Q C O O= + d N (D '_^ .�_ a y >' 0 i. > Q -O +- N N Q ! U ''z Q L ii rr `1 0 O O 7 Q 0 O Q 0 O i� N I j O I N y U Q U O v- _ 5 L (5,'fi fgsrfavjn �i 1 �C .� tN ii is5 (,r, S 1e t ZS{t y 3r gt't� � 4r h i ii r o O _O N LC 3 N O LF C C: O -C a) U O Oi O ! O N u O O O Q i;s nti 1+ aC `�i r 'i �' }5tttt o m o Q I 3 � pp O> E N a) Q p 2 N p J L 3 uF r 1 xi k4 S tx F�3 C > C n 7 "' sr i erY 5 kF} Yx +'irr ' O O .0 O O U +{-- C tytC -r d r r tttr br �v is� O i Q o .3 O C j U �+ U U yt ikit .Z j1- S . up ci C N > t of -t! r {hf .: = S 7� r +Zf �r SsF' C •N -C O r -<r r "�dit5.• O i7j O �% C Q- C tr:ri }€ zk >t #r i ,� +4iar p Q Q _� O 3 O p m O 'O O O 3 C ii:V { `dr Q x l fs� Y Vin? CZI Q. O N o N O N O } r l�'�s'�rLCO i {4}itS Q Q N (D s r u v �tk. *§at't it a 3 = � > f 1 fJtl ftdi N SQ, �r� •� ?; I Q N p N C Q LO �..`^ N O � -ems-- to O 0 > a a>> -C 3 C° X' Q V) �. j M, " 4/� 3 r 1 a'+ P O O O O Q N o o o Q N O O 000 i c0 c m sic19i Z) 4) U C O Q N ...-. — - O tYAt tyis; O =-C U N Oi O Q O O C Q N U O a) Ch O tLO N ON {wt a {lxP h Yi O Z3 O p O p 0 O p U N u-_ 61N O = N N yC -C ` � p lr sas aanOn s O V 2 O O Q O Q_ j N o O d � Q U i n D N � N� N j O N 1 O ti rtrf�lQ� �' O D c Q Q' > f1 JOEilA O O O u '� �, N Q C i N O ____�1 6 Utrt(rr o. Q. > 'N . � o � b c p =-C 3 O N o r 'esRi t q� t i t y k'. , 5 5t -I 12 � O -O O1 '^ 0 N Q. � M c: Le sc�y s3XZGSS�il� " +.'� (Sg N (14 N C C t7 I X Eyt a'e' t 6 O — O C U O O O m U O e o n O 4 p c <t co a �'.'. Film t2rL iRt F Y41Fdy > C U 4— = Ill III O T Yvt N+ rfAT it �t?ftT3� O O_ ,Q N O N E d �k� a O. er� �k Ytn �6 ;a M r qtr- �tri'`t�ar Q y .0 i O C _� O N C O i U O N F � ,- — O +- 'O C N �a3i's d U O i ass;r r§ ss� rkr C C X O cU + � O in � � L O +`D 0 2 N p U C E o) CL +s s 4 O Q FMU i p U O O -D O O O O Q n E 0- 6 E O L T3 ) 0 1- Q O } L C i 140 N O I M I O 0 V M N i O N U 'E 4- N N D C O O p N � N N I � 3 D ro w L O� G)_ O O� � d 00 (1) O -0 -C D d H a�� o 0 o a ° -'ao ( (1) C N C C 0 0 c O N O O C O N O p O 0 o N O N U.6 ° U U-'Z O Uv N �V Q C 70 3 N t'C- L C 3 U ) -C o s o � > O O = > E O Q O N O N O N O v O "O D N -C O a O O O O n N O j O O O 0 -O E d CO N °U 0 0> o c� ° C: o o O U O i N _ 0 N p O � U) :0 1� 5T O = C tt* p N p O O o f� O N - O I O `O C: (0 c O U U Z51 - O O LO O O N 1 10 � .{ a O � H f L _ x,�, 00 10 LO O L C N O �•3 o ° U 7 s _O U U - 5 O u� Q -0 ^ .0 C a ^ N - p � N { I �1i — i O ° ,� O 00 o O 0 .,_ O � N 0 N L 0 O) N n .� '� N N { N N C .0 O Q. O Q! O O O 6 O 'C O U C O D p Q O Q- 0 1 m o� U -D oU.O� a� PF! Lo f 0 ,O a�.i ,O r O _ L vc co o' .y 'S Y N , Y ui 0 �N O Ea �i c M N c 0 v N O I M I O 0 V M N i O N U 'E 4- N N D C O O p N � N N I � 3 D ro w L O� G)_ O O� � d 00 (1) O -0 -C D d H a�� o 0 o a ° -'ao ( (1) C N C C 0 0 c O N O O C O N O p O 0 o N O N U.6 ° U U-'Z O Uv N �V Q C 70 3 N t'C- L C 3 U ) -C o s o � > O O = > E O Q O N O N O N O v O "O D N -C O a O O O O n N O j O O O 0 -O E d CO N °U 0 0> o c� ° C: o o O U O i N _ 0 N p O � U) :0 1� 5T O = C tt* p N p O O o f� O N - O I O `O C: (0 c O U U Z51 - O O LO O O N 1 10 � .{ a O � H f L _ x,�, 00 10 LO O L C N O �•3 o ° U 7 s _O U U - 5 O u� Q -0 ^ .0 C a ^ N - p � N { I �1i — i O ° ,� O 00 o O 0 .,_ O � N 0 N L 0 O) N n .� '� N N { N N C .0 O Q. O Q! O O O 6 O 'C O U C O D p Q O Q- 0 1 m o� U -D oU.O� a� PF! Lo f 0 ,O a�.i ,O r O _ L vc co o' ZdlO H8Ax5_ .. o n M It N co N °v H94xE M N N N M I N f i m0 N o CL 'v 0 Z3 o a0i ai c j C U O U O r o N O 0 ` 4 t { N (} C: O N O O i ijfl �1 N j p p o p 'V U O S;,e iti cl CO O N QO CO O Q N U Xll o ci �} ,} qqk1+ft r VIP I z � ,�i ril�J }fit ++ f1 i�1r � c 0 0 0 0 0 0 O I U T 1—;O 0— w0 L t.` 0 !n O O O O O O 4 :?} J„ J o ; U ZdlO H8Ax5_ .. o n M It N co N °v H94xE M N N N M I N f i m0 N o CL 'v 0 Z3 o a0i ai c j C U O U O r o N O 0 ` 4 t { N (} C: O N O O i ijfl �1 N j p p o p 'V U O S;,e iti cl CO O N QO CO O Q N U Xll o ci �} ,} qqk1+ft r VIP I z � ,�i ril�J }fit ++ f1 i�1r � c 0 0 0 0 0 0 O I U L lJ U l� M I e-il jx'i CMS -;ar �5 �.1 O O O,d, OM. O p O h U _ I CO i Y rSFii^4 y! < r)1 I Q O LO /On O '10n I � 0 0 aan :n� }s °co LO ^ ° ° ° ° °n ° ` L N X06 n i 0 0 0 in 0 0 0 CD d �(iss�fi,i'a�kf4 N C-4 Co X N N n C a * + +L oo LAO U L;viF(tv:es;7s "`.;a M in O O U; �O (':) � CL1 a- t r +r'a _I 3t iG' a. y'r� I � LQ o� v v L V; rrst; t 5H1 � 3liS3 U -F- 1{ n °'qs a .r 7C) 0 q) p ll 0 0 Q 0) 0) d p N N N N C c oZ H „yrt}� �Q �a �a aQ'o� L h n 00 O O O O O O L lJ U l� M I e-il jx'i CMS -;ar �5 �.1 O O O,d, OM. O p O h U _ I CO i Y rSFii^4 y! < r)1 I Q O LO /On O '10n I � 0 0 aan :n� }s °co LO ^ ° ° ° ° °n ° ` L N X06 n i 0 0 0 in 0 0 0 CD d �(iss�fi,i'a�kf4 N C-4 Co X N N n C a * + +L oo LAO U L;viF(tv:es;7s "`.;a M in O O U; �O (':) � CL1 a- t r +r'a _I 3t iG' a. y'r� I � LQ o� v v L V; rrst; t 5H1 � 3liS3 U -F- 1{ n °'qs a .r 7C) 0 q) p ll 0 0 Q 0) 0) d p N N N N C c oZ H „yrt}� �Q �a �a aQ'o� L h n 00 L a / . / 2 G 2 @ / } \ f / % / \ \ § u / 0 % \ _ [ \ \ R \ \ ƒ � \ \ / @ \ s \ Q� / \� \ \ / \ » % / & \ \ \ \ \ \ % \ / \ \ �K 2 / - 3 u t o \ \ o e / 7 ) a W u m 0 ] - � / � • / § $ & \ ± / \ � \ £ _ t m § % 3 / ± 0 +— % 14- ®$ S / / 6 % 2§ E Cl) e/ a LC) = g « 2 ± 2 3 3 ƒ 2- 2 7 2 \\ Z u&= 2 g u u L 2 $ / $ % 2 o u y a L&_ 0 3 m 6 w o o 0 U§ C a\ / 0 % \ _ [ \ \ R \ \ ƒ � \ \ / @ \ s \ Q� / \� \ \ / \ » % / & \ \ \ \ \ \ % \ / \ \ �K V) N 1-0 O 4� Y 't. U 0 M 0 0 Q 6i C N -o ro QJ Q c ro _v v u a 0 fV 0 0 CL 0 �t U 0 m a CCD O co v nn u E f6 U C c v U W 0 d., C a) (O .0 Q' G) O 0 ti c 0 d0` ro N F" ■ fd 'O L Ui O G1 '0 u ro u v ro ro u nLJ o N U; c L E QJ C ro QI � V s 0 C 0 7 N � L CO a E 0 s u U 3 3 s Q� z d u cs a. 0 O v r LO M N co O O rn Q V C) Ol p d d d' M x O co O CL 0 Q O co N Ul cs Q. R O N 0 t v7 .T d 1 L O 4- O a CL i-- O Q .y ro in S Y Y LL :3 L C L -p QJ N O N Z N QJ QJ @ L y = C ~ "- s 0 cj aJ CU C C a1 i L ro v o =. O N^ •Of C 3 a v 0. c`a 0 O N ro E C O ro Q1 �1 C 0 C T 0- � _ N �p 4� a.• ,�. �. U Q C ro C Ql O vi in v1 +U�, L C L Q_ E (D C: L cj M QJ la VI an Y 'O S E y Q. E y. '� O L. N. > O U v ro w�.. O •E ro z O lz L O L O U v •j v. "O -1- N O N ° "O C ro � � '� v _0 o -c ^ c do c� a Y V aJ E s a 3 0- -0 CL _ C Ln ro 7 Q1 aJ -fl.._ a) C 7 O Y C vt CJ QJ L U C > ro ro E QJ ro CL .-I o E E OJ C 'O, vi ro fn -'4 ON +L-+ O 0 T O '� f0 -C U 3 u aJ O O o aJ o f L• C Z3 F3 0- O a ro Y U ` v o v E a o �' v o ro E QJ o_ `n + '+' ro u + L E U v tin aJ 0 0 a o° ° Z o o v �. a `�-, v FL- en. Y v 4- o v 2!- t •h o^ O :Ea E°O6 Q,� U o L E t , Q a o C on iE QJ U L C Y C ro C O 0. c 0 a '00, O C ro E W v N u 'U 'U'� a M v N L' .0 O N C VI ro N C N C Y Y L OL QJ � C w O 0 �~ v n 7 ro Y 1 E :.a C C ro QJ Co 0. O E X � 0 � .0 O CL C E v1 0 E Y Y C ,C O "O QJ do 0 ro L U C U QJ L aJ E 0 O L s 0 QJ L a C 0 ro N L +, M aJ w ,�, Y v u O co C t ro L u Y o ',_ O Q a; CO a� p > s a, ° N E °�' ^ c ^t 'o � ,o � Y LIJ Q) N L E L Qj L v Qj u C N O N � s > a ai O L Q) U t -O -0 O O v O ro L > a C E E ` p ° (D c° L V CL s u~ VI J 3 th 0 o N° " 0 VI 'd Q Q% Ql E _C aJ to LLA t a u Ln Q � @ -^ o v O o 3 -0 N E -pCn w QJ C S] v1 N +� -C QJ C C v C C aJ ® o ° ro o a s ono L ro 0_ ��a 'O v O '^ ro N O. o aJ (C4 aJ a�LJ .� �- av- C +�-' Q�i 3 3 av•oat m c v IC ct Y O y U - QJ C u L- v C av_, J _ E pip aJ @ aJ O� O N ro~ C Y� Q1 (j.. N m E E O 7 E v —u o '' N. E a `� N O o- L o f Z ro QJ C o u Z L v a VI aJ N Q, aJ U aJ N C7 E O =_ E aJ -o ro QJ Q c ro _v v u a 0 fV 0 0 CL 0 �t U 0 m a CCD O co v nn u E f6 U C c v U W 0 d., C a) (O .0 Q' G) O 0 ti c 0 d0` ro N F" ■ fd 'O L Ui O G1 '0 u ro u v ro ro u nLJ o N U; c L E QJ C ro QI � V s 0 C 0 7 N � L CO a E 0 s u U 3 3 s Q� z d u cs a. 0 O v r LO M N co O O rn Q V C) Ol p d d d' M x O co O CL 0 Q O co N Ul cs Q. R O N 0 t v7 .T d 1 L O 4- O a CL i-- O Q IN's 0 'L .�U.r L 0 An U. O .O L Q C a N 6 O U i, - tCiy, M W cLs r m a cai O @ a) y O (U Y Cl_ p a) E L Q L c u C Y a Q . C: o :10 x v M U E a) O a) i L L 0 Ll n p a o o �.@ E o a) L° 0 TH r@ E c .E - L ° C LL j C 3 c c O +-, o c u o a) -0 a t 3 — .Q u a Ou p U) a M C: ° a °� a) N C: w CC -O E L E c c a) 0 + 0 'O O , 3 U p a + Q) c L a O C O. O U a M (a m E Q) I :j -0 O u1 Y Vl N L E c ra O p)0) CU -C ,� C� c 76 H p C 0 a)-O v } a) c 0 a v c �-0 LL Q• � .� a ° c ? x 3 0 •`Ln 0 L E C -- 02-0 o ff La m M L C: c O O C C Q a+ ul U v 0 L a) 0 tw N c N a v v •+: ,] U 7 o c Q) U O ° L° 3 > O Y -Q ai aJ C > O OU v .E cu o a E N c rTO v 'vi E o :N L a) ai C _T L VI O Y a v Y c c c Ou 30 a) (D n3 U c �v= c o a Q () a Q) L a) > + W C L > a W c ° a) v -0 o v - c a) 0 ` t u L a t a) a) co t a U Q) ° 4J+ C 3 Y 7 a O U C a) a) L C L C C c a) U ) L O p n N ut M O 3 � 0 O +Ln 'o E � a) c O ca 41 L a c o > n .� TOW a3 E u M c nn ,E ° a) -C o a) Y C O a) L O Y O a L O@ Q p p a p r- C w a) a o Y v > o E c - a0 3 a) Y o Q 3 u a v o a) ° 'Fa (D n a t + v , F n - M W cLs r C O O a) a LL v c N Q1 L L Y Q) v- O o C c ;N 'Y Y U L -O Q) c c � C ,bD >. _O Ou @ O ca a L Q) o > U Y o a a m °- E 7 -O a) ..0 > S CL CU a v a Ln W ,o °• a � c p ° U +� cu� � O v V I c nu, o 0 v U a) L O dOn tin v c C o U L u Q p ' n a @ LA a) Ln OZ � v a) O @ C L CL M � � C (U @ ? v ° cu aj c > Y o a) E -c N ai 'm Q O `i (6 J F-I a 0 u s d u N S .0 i-- d c d u U d LL S cs u d T) LO Ln N O C) O LO o. Q U d Ol O d LO r M x O C.0 O CL O 0 O ol N rn 0 CL `' O N {Q G S D_ LO 0 L 0 N GY L O L m a cai _ N > 2 m O C' a T > 0a cnc (6 n T > Cl_ p a) E a) E° C p Y L N L1. v) c a) 0) .T� @ '- c O O . E @ y o o o o �.@ E o a) L° 0 TH r@ E c .E ° L ° T o' 0) @Ea) E m•- Ms m c a uci '0 c a) 0 m o c u'a) a a) C O m V) L U a O E N U C C M C: ° a °� `a m n) o a Q E 0C� o ° °o° Q M) o N v EMoa) L M 00 a0 •U a) •O Q) E -C ul � 0 C N '> u O m0 p)0) CU -C ,� C� N N.p `F- O' s.. W TC a)-O O.LO- 6'O Q. U.O� CW �-0 LL � c O Q o� w C c 3 c o U O 0 02-0 o ff C °o m "'- m M. - N N O O O C C Q a+ ul U N aN j N c N y, U a) a) •� *•' CS N L .0-I ,] U 7 ai Q. N p 'Oa N E w v) N 4 U i N 0 0 p a.- O. O c E T D a) U m0C:9) "o N N L O 0 U �, Q 0 a).` YO p 9 •U U Y@ a) 0� ,._T. ..0 N M O .Q M 0 Q a) C Q C `mommai :.-1 :5 U �N•� °a aa) °o M M�°m W a`)).> ooa)_ommc ..0 > ,4L,, U> N C •p M �a)c 0- M 0 a m .0 o O -.- L @ a)> m.> C 0 u) O o S a W N O oc�°s�oma)�0 m p w+ a) aa)) o >L caa vi .,*' -O @ ~ N a) •C tpn C W O .� TOW a3 E a) a) y T u) ,C ca @ O Cl U U 'p W N N 2 p r- C w -fl 0 "0 L a C I- tB •C a) a) t0 O -a N a) d v ca s c� (D-c: F> L c`a ° a V Q x� O N 0 c (n :C ,� a) a)a) C V) c N M a) C `a a p•N�a)E�o �,_a 4 ° Z m N a a) ' - uO N a) O .c w Q) 22=0 y n a0 L a O N , .3 a a) o C 1- a 1= Imo - o m n !- a C a) U a O e O C W C7 LL A Z C O O a) a LL v c N Q1 L L Y Q) v- O o C c ;N 'Y Y U L -O Q) c c � C ,bD >. _O Ou @ O ca a L Q) o > U Y o a a m °- E 7 -O a) ..0 > S CL CU a v a Ln W ,o °• a � c p ° U +� cu� � O v V I c nu, o 0 v U a) L O dOn tin v c C o U L u Q p ' n a @ LA a) Ln OZ � v a) O @ C L CL M � � C (U @ ? v ° cu aj c > Y o a) E -c N ai 'm Q O `i (6 J F-I a 0 u s d u N S .0 i-- d c d u U d LL S cs u d T) LO Ln N O C) O LO o. Q U d Ol O d LO r M x O C.0 O CL O 0 O ol N rn 0 CL `' O N {Q G S D_ LO 0 L 0 N GY L O L N C [iS Q .LZ y r0+ 7 U t O N ,O .O G1 C a N C O U � O a� a fV L ro u> s_ O N -C O Y O N C a p ,7 a ° u LL C a v E— >• U Ln s Q> -m Q; t ro e s C° a 0 H a Q O N N O m. t 0 w N `u^ v 7 CL a a '- a rQ C vi in ro L 'vi J U in O a t O a@ a Y . C a ro E a� > ro a E o 0 0 r O O . ro N � 0 -0 O O > ro Y O O O Oi .X L Q) = O Y u N O a M a L O m -- J-� X n Y L p !n. 0 n. u Y L L '" U a C N +a+ a0 Q m' r-+ O a> C 0 L C O O N= !n L C E Q a) L ro Vl Q m> a L Y m C .0 Y N co Z U C Y O a-' E Q) r o p r-1 O C u O 0 a a '� •� � E L Q^ a u L � Y m a Q Y C a a ° p a° ?- L a a o >, v> oQ u -0 Q Q—) Yo o f w v v v sa w s a LQ LL �a H J- o °�° : v 3 v t v� v Y o 0 3 C v 3 _O -, Q t OL C a �. N. 7 .fl E a �6 O L E a m u ate-+ a L O a @ C y" ,n to ro p !Q > L tw ro a ,a+ O a s C a m O O m o ,o z> o \o ,� E a E@ o E > o U a) to a � N N. @ a >- O "� E Y O 7 O a C O L to v ° n@ N m C u c�Q •Q u L '"Q ) a a Y a u u E o v n a: t 6° a) v E v a `� aui v o ro * u c o N u �+ v a °+ a a i ° O a O ,�. m Q m@ O m a o m. Q Y U v m Q Y N C E a �� C a 4- N (I)-ow u C ro i O 0 0) Q a 0 C m � m �. _ 'Q a U '+� C s_ a L p 7 a� a v) t L Y L O 0 > ° O L o n U w v -U- CL a L =i O a a a o 'v L s = L U a u F c -0 O Y a C a � O s C C o 3 a a 'L 4 p a d p O m > O+ a 4 U a C L a L n Y �- a ..0 �. N Q) a C m> a � 'T � L N N� 73 a Q Y 4 (Q n Y a M 00 ;L, U a U> 7 C �' N 00 ro Q O ro N p Y ro to O a a-0 U a t u a L1 in v CO D yL_, a O an L -c Q •- a; O¢ 6 Y H a •c m r�Q ~ 0 m +> o Y v E a C m C o u a Y ro L E s in w O a O N L 3 '� a O C Q1 bD M fCQ M p N a j L Q) t N a �O N 'J-= a. V7 0. Y v m o > Q Q> L Y 0 o uQ v x cQ o 3 C o a) > a ro a L Vl O ' > b a u a s a3 Q a c m E a ru -0 m m -C -C3 C C^ t a C m m> C -00 - >@ m O C 00 E v V p 0 -p. a a a E L o a a Q)' L p Y o s N Y 0 Y a Q a O Y � Y a Y a O a -fl O u u ,� Y a - a L b D Y .� v U v m Y E QC) CL ` m v 0> C O s L 3 a a Y a °) E ) a ro a L n C o E v) E a v> o Q ❑ p aj u ro ` m •- a m L L) Y bn m .N a L? Y a � � @ Q Si m a m a -x o o L Q a a C ro 7 N 5.. to Q a Q Y U a Cl. C C Y ` Sn L =� '�", ro a QJ M Y a m v p O> m o m m I a m a p v° v 3 Cmi o >° v v a a C u a Q -00 E ,� u o b u a 3 E= caw .E ° m CL tf1 lD I� O 0 0 0 O 0 O O M co r--i t/? {/? N N N N X X x O O O O Ln O vl Lf) i-I d' 00 V). lj'� ll-� V� o x x x O O O en . Ln V c0 00 11 N M d' 0 Y V N 4 lD a L E O Y C O 7 L Y O a � L m Y O Y 0 �w _O a Y L � a L L Y .Y.. L C u p � a C u 7 u-- L p Y L Y m O a O ui O p, Y O o � L L a C c C ro v a o � a a O m 3 ro .n v �L L- Q Q v Qj ro ro s � U a 3 0. m CL L O a p N a L Li N 4 C a o O > Q ro a O O O u a c -0 a r E a a U 0 a o a C L a p O U s u U N a 3 n. N C N .O O s 0 u N a LO LO M LO N Q O Lo Lo Q U d 0 d V M X O m O CL 0 4-• 0 O M N CT O y FIR O N O s .N 0 d to Ci G O q Q a. N vi L O .fl L Q V/ N W O cl N 3 L O S Y O Q 04 e 75 N e O U s'.K ccj C C m C (U s Q) m y m m C p A Y 0- U a) ,(U Y m C O 0 U 0 Lp Y Y N O > N Yp L O .9 an d _O Q = v� Cl. N 3 N CO w u C +' � @ o m U L L ..0 N C @ Q) u Ou E in O 0 O O 7 E E -0 Q) C •C y ..0 L 0 �-0 E : L m 'L m YO o C O N O O O O 'C U 1 u 'O 0 m o u t i ai Q) N () Q) ..0 Q) Z3 t. a-• Vf Q) C _ C N•m " vmi > p N O Q) m p 0 O N u Q YO 'O 7 Q) E L c O v— O L Cl a) Q E p v f L ._ U -0 C Y Q) o Y U m C a) v c c n 0 n m v v 0 o °' r w n CL S ,� v O 'u `�- E :C ++ + .0 C C v a) L O t w O O u C Ll N L O v-- > 7 .� 0 0. _ — Y C O w 0 ,� Q) _C Y L p E Q Y al Q) U V 7 N m Y m L Q a N Y Q) Y a) c _>• Y m -p v E () -0 O -O +� O f6 C— C o 0 .L Y bb U a O -0 U Q1 O A C vvi Q) b0 O U M > v 7 o 0- ai v E U m m -q- 0 -C O -o v Q 0 L m Q1 Q) 4 > Q) by m Ou n C C v L a) ^E b0 � C L +�+ C 4- E O N O M p N E C Y L m Y m .y ; e O m u ? X .� �_ Y a) - N C U -C O O u o 0- E O > "0 ,E ..O m v j a) O ..Y C O o z3 CL -0 m •� bbn �- S O CL +� o a a > m C > N L I m C a) C v m O a o :O m 3 v ..0 ca E Q. u m p v Q) C bn L 'O .0 v p `m _ L > C O 0 0 0 m 'o u C --+ (YO YO a) u) E '� Y Q1 •0 L� C O '> a) 7 t Q) Y C a) O m � -a Y E VI Y v E O 0 -0 L m C O — • E 0 0 Y YO •F '� 'o u +� 'O m m �n 'O .- S W �n U N 0 ? Q) 0 C O Q1 U N s"' a) Y 'L U Q) VI Q) Q) V1 i d4 0 C 0- 7 '0 Y L v) Q) L 'A L N S 0 C v) p m �. Y 'T a) C Q) p m o 0 -�C, w m v u 0_ v L m m Y •L Q) w �4. ,n on (D c v E La C m 3 n a O O O v N .0 v p +� � -p Y N a) c v^ +� m Y C v v_ c v p .0 m k s m p C O E Y m a Y C Q u C Q) a) o pQ U° "' �� m m n v o C o@ Q) t C v m C Q) m m v 3 C O m E o o m� D c D o . m o p C L a) o' +S-' j N -O0 vii •9 >O m v 0 a� ° C o 0 i v y v E cc s e v o v m o °�' ° ar o° C y E i O Q) p 'i"' Y to °a -n C CG 3 0_ ti a) ° C c° ar ,� a N E o a a a C Y O C ® Y = N 0 LA = p E U C ° Z< 0 o 0 >° aUi 4"- 0 a` Q) N s -O U aL+ a1 '� m 0 0 o Q. o QY) u Q O 0 0 O O O Q) m Q' f U Y U V) u "0 CQ �i N a) Y v t a) > m v ai c m m � N O E Q) S Ql >j ,U L L � O a) .0 � O t C Y =' o u � S Y M O L Z3 t Y -m0 U .'�O -� Q. O i O M V 0- C L + L 7 O v- O .t3) O N +, > (v O U L O p m a) Q) 0. t a) 0 v +S O O u o a) U > in C fl. vl C o O U L u u a) a) o w > 0 n ,I/, L m c Q) O 0 a) X 0_ () sQ..) v to v a Y a1 () Q S L � C v o Q) V V M cr_ O O O O C L O O ' L C o O () " 0. ,E O n V) Qj Q) L L C O L 0 V) 4J o E O U m a L � m C oU o C v Y � U O a) C C U m m t Q. a) E N C O ra ' m Y U Y C Q) � U C Qi 0 0 o ) Qu 7 (1 4 Q a x v v C p C 0 O 7 -0 O C 2� O U Y � m v Y "0 Y O O C cu C E 0 m Q O � Q) C ° L L Q m s v a�i o v � C C m Q) u Q) -0 C Q) O O N cE� m � E L 0 N U U 0 C / I u p m O 0 Z Qj H N `^ O U d U N T) 3 3 3 \ c). a-- d C Q) S U CS nO.. V S U d b m LO N O Ir O O LO ON d V a 0 0 tl tl d' M x 0 m O CL 0 "r 0 0 CL O N (S i 0 a T O 4- L CL 0 N h L O S K h r ?� p.. � � Y�'�� *lift �x ?7 `�• L .c O ro /n .>O. t O Y- O Q c, 9 N C O U M M v 0 4 W u C m O c u 0 0 a` v N N f6 - cn aj C C u u co O u N n Q ,cam p u ` N @ C V m c p i -n O O u -0 O c = W @ - u O o v a) ° u s v o 0 0 u C u H v a 0 0- c L L o o v u c 0 (1) O u G + V Q L a) .v ° CL O O O a) C a) v � � v v •°J v ° Q v L : m v s 0 m o 0 E a 0 O LL C X Q O E O u io N C t CL -O L Y L C N' N u o O U m 'o N c +m (U v a) w ° E � o -Ln E O O u j O m io o u u v ,D u ur) N C O C 0 0 a v o w m o � a L N n. >' v o 1 0 O c° �f) L O s a) O u U aJ + A a @ O 4D E c m — o c o O a) r0 C El o6 E Q) o co E v Q m O � E �� a•o c C± 0 •yr IA L1 u O �- ❑. -- 0 aO+ X O C) d u '0 o N ,0 O o c0 a O a` o �- -0 o E M O¢ c o 0 ra o c 0 w cC o o U r. !ai >1 m ro a c 70 U a U) Q N C (U N ro 3 ro 4) c a) .) a� N o c o o ..0 •� " p 27) u) T co U U L 'O O L c U ro -0 ro U 0-0 U E U o cU CU wo -0 E iU o o 0) cu (D O c° _0 o ro c c L x cn c_ L p y ° c U 0 m� U O � o a) (0 o E =-0 L U (U ''^ O U O O p c O c O N O ro "0 p 0 L N O ro 0.2 =3roo a'0) �ro � cam° (U 4- L C c C) U .N O) cow N = Jt3) U) E c cc� E �� oc _ U c O U w O o O OU �.-• fl U " o_ O L Q ro N Q) Q U N c N rn V 1 L C N N c tOn U) 00 N c N p m ro � u°i ° N O> Y A-- O N +� — (cU fn N • U E U o ro M.- � ; 0 O � q) � � � � > ro> i Co 0 c° c p 0) N a) p Y 'V) p 0 c .7 C ro N c p) c U N =E Y� -0-a mroro o c Y° c o o` c o a) ° -0 ro wo E wf- `0 cnu) � (1)o +J O N ` o i p t� O (6 C ro •ro ro ro 4) U U ro "U Q p o N "Q •� 0. Q C Q Q U O V) ro N L Y U U U t6 N (U — (p U O E O O U U ro m O ?O �> .. U) ro ro°)oc�UO� E'ccuo) 0" -0 fn p c O N C ro Q O ) -0 ro N N (1) N C)° ro > O E Q ,L .� E a) O OU yU'+ N .0 co O (U U c O,> c Y 'C N N 0-O O E ro ro E' (LU C > U � a o � n — E (U CL c ; o u>i Q cco oa�•�n o� o c �� p" >� L.c— rn E 0 ro roc a� �L: O O > ( ° y >(D r_ W � 0 o N E E ° °U O LN 1 U U U c ro U U> p (c - 0 CL o 0� N M d 6 (O f` O 4- O N N d Q. 5 O V t d u v, 3 3 3 Cl s d c N v d n. @j d u d _d LO LO M N N C0 O d O LO rn V O p d N L d � M � x `^ o 'L � d a 0 d ,T i O i O L 0 rz d L O .n I IT a� a ai' �1r„�•tf��h N 'L U O `O Q e35 C: s N C O ca o c N N O o O N >oa)E C M C: E $ N a�i�' n C I— O N "22' ° O N c6 E C Q O m p) N C Z� a) .0 O M N .c M> �cF- a) U0 � N a) O 0)— 0> N 3 0 � �° � °��Qro E� 5 -0 ? N a) - �� a) M a) o -0 O a) + _ N 7 U N -Q N C > O p Y C 'C N (l3 a) (� .� E Q) O7 a) (b M O a) M a) p N p C ''"' Q Y (6 (D = E > 0 N 7 0 (d L L c O O a) i a) C v- U E a-� N 0 �_ a p O N C o, V 0 O N C N Y (0 a) c •` N L N 7 a) -0 C C a) Q C a) CA a) •L7 y... (n C C _ "-' V) teQ O N N N Q a) c O N C C O a) a) p Q M ca)j ° C C U a N � U O)a) L E 0 a' c° W m c = Q� ca CY) Q E a N L ° O U O n a �.J C p O L a) N O co a) C N (D '�- .0 o c Q E' E N -o I E o N Qi —T a) o a) N C " a) o m3 E o�i� m mow o. o) 0 M o m a) a>, 0) 0 ° N O O C C C O 0 c E c c N a) (6 7 '@ O D U p Q) ) O D cm O ` N .O Co C 4 O a) Q) in O a) o O C «� (0 C> N N U 0-U 0 o o p• °' c N >, -Q M N ° N j w O U � U (0 C C U S = C . ,�C, N ° o 'O 3 L� .� N N° L vC- C Q Q O N O p 0 @ a) C > O C N E C - 2 >, N p a) R1 'C ca . -O C - a s N u a) �= O N m° C U 0 .0) � L E o E > ro C m a°° o �� a) Q �+ N f2 0 U) ` o N o a) N o 0-0 oo (a c `°o ° o a � �h C ° �o��.X c.m c M N �� O C C O U (6 a) T o c N o n aoi N >1 C C o m - o -Q > O L '� C a) a) (0 C. 0-0 O N N N cu 0) E -Op C N O U m> 0 L C E 'O E° N w a) Y O U« O cv� �f°5° OOH ) o °ai °>E�N� Ec>0 o c c (� c m c N n� ° C c° a (n �,�'o.o- O U O= U L r O 0) @ a) O cL >> 0) a) U U > �` > N 0 N N 0 o N _ a U) vC a�i N fl a) a) N C _ ai n N UY STN C3 a>i 0) -C C C2 7 N O N C M C �s �, N a) -0 m a) f•- C 0 a) 2 a) C m 0 t=iI V E (n'C E to N U O J m E a) U C o @ o 7 C p f6 p N O C N _4 'O-c a to p C 0) �' a; E (D o �E OU O N p N +-� ro C v a) E m` a) N •i Q E C a) 'C N .0 0) N 70q)70oCm�uCim° N N O (D .N N E j a)0� -, �oa�`D>Na)°)5 0 Q a) Y 0 U C v- O 0 o .0 CC) C) o U)) (on a) o N C V ' C a) o aJ p O) µ- >, — CL L •> o c— ` C U U' C N o Q- a) N N - 'O C O) O N a) C C` N > L ..0 (Q U m o O a) C 'O fl �O C U a) (6 C1 E N YNO C c M a) o C •` C 0 — N c O C Q ui '� 0 a) a) a) ° 0.. Im a -p N a+ O) 0 C (� O D N y° p C 0 U U C o O C p- N° o o N i is N N s] a N O Q C CO ° M (U6 (� (u *5 C E N O u= C m ,� C (6 O 'p a) M Q) N N (6 @ c N N U) N m Q "O fn O � (6 fn m F- 0 � E ,` m C � a) CL � .Q OU N .0 CC) O) N O V s 0 U 3 3 c,. t d C d .n U O O d 'O LO m N Co O 0 O LO ON V m x 0 m O CL 0 V v- 0 ('7 co w 0 Pat O N T {6 C s 2 �T O L O 0 Q K-• KA 0 Q _ txr ITS' N c� 0 .S3 N N v 0 x CZS O m <f, >3i y N C O U V L MO Oil 0 LA. 0 r_ LLJ 06 P t 00 CL. a- CL c; z tn C O C N O N O C O-0 / O o? N p O a D O U) A N E > H O O O -0w v -0 O �Q�> � a ° o ' O [' •N 3 O i N N (3) o� N 3 O a O c o o m U O C C -- 0) Q) a O U O' cro n =O N O O i -O o 3 Q �y 3 v �O v o Q) (1) , N v U a� p O U U06 C) U O O C 'X O N ,O N �_ w U) c <n N O O *- C O E O 0 C) 0 C U "O C ro �_ ro > N O L N N N C) n N N N 0 Q O CL U) U Q O` C O N C C O N O �- C 0 O N C N C N Q r U �'�� �� �•- ro 4 co t O .N O v p -1 Oo C Cam- t_ �3 v C N a ro@ N O D-o Q o _C U U o Q_'3 "' s� °� =�o a) �°,,� �` vim' O o L�,� U N a C C7 N 4- E c O v N N N c O O z o C Q C U O c- U7 _ O �-- < :3 cc C o— o v a) o a Q) - o -C C o oa L ( ;N V) �'N�, o� N Q FF- O N N 0 E Q 3 C N 00)0 0 J O N � a Co to •0 C O O a> > a N O N O —0 o O O O' Q)= N ,c C U'O ) 4 a@ O O NM 6 ;N ro cz c. O 3 C) SZ- 3•� °� o N a� N O N o� N ,_ O Q C N p C Q C n N C Q) fl Q o a �� �� N }� o o a _ :D a '� Q N C O 5 c 3 N O �) O p N O a? o N c o U N C N 0)N c C O ro z .o C 0_ O N N a o '^ � N p O N S) Q O ¢ o mrn co O— p C o•- - `0 c L V C O 73U C N M @ b 2) n N N N C .O �oNV 6 O �0 o�3 �U'`m� oG)a > N N ® N O 2 o ro o T •L j N N O 6 E N O D �aCoa U O L U N O O N 0 C .� O U N oo� �U C U N �� O N .0 .0 C F- U •�, N UUo °a o e U— D(D O C N 'o O LU O L. [O X N I w -a E 0 U .i d U .0 S C n. @j z d u t` LC) M In N i 00 O 0 O LO O� Q v d 0 d d M X 0 m O d O V` 4-- 0 `t N 0 O N UT S d a �T L 0 L O 4- } i O 0. d L 0 K rF r y. ( t r R CJ o N a v 'C 0 S A O Q N C O U 0 u S a u 3 o_ {- }- S N c N .O U d a t d U N 'O LO In M LO N 00 O 14- O O rn Q U d 0 d a m x O m 0 d O O LO M d 61 4_ L 0 N C6 C S a_ d L O i- L 0 CL 0 Q co L N ip C, Q O p d o m} L p O d +O - }} p C o cn o 4 Vl aU d Q O S d `1� d U i V1 Q. 4- 'O ,-- L N v1 fi E m S a N a Q 61 o d 's t 0} c U Q�Qi > C Q N 3 u u Q. 3 O - 7C) co C j d N d E 4L- L Ol T O > > O O crd� -fl tl O -0 O 'O S' Q L -.�Q -- N L Q o Q > E °o tA « -��"' d d a s C Q O Q y-- p O �" . o C) g 0 4) C3 o O NO Q d odi u O O Q ,Q 7 +- LL 'N L d V O U� -p Q a a � ,� T V O N} O N M O O 4% N V +L +O O In a Q O U U O U 7C) Q Vl >} S Q D a~ Q O - Q L L d} 9 p cc^n t a Q U Q p "- o a a d a} d to d L d d d _. -Y�- s Q Q d _ =p II. to d ?� O N> �' Q s u N o h a> 4- t i- c Q N Q +T o s o o d 'd d 3 a o a U_ N 'a r; �d c� a cn -a p a a y^ F a O v� Q L Q L d \1 C L C L u N N L O a t- } > Q C s can a3° C �'�aa L In d 0) os°'�v° �_003� C L � O L Q •` 'Q ♦A V V1 L d Vl } d .� O � V7 i-- ,Q O •.� Q Q O Q ®I S iT- VI `Q m iL- cQ> U � �� a � Q_0 o o� cn } a +- °'X ° ° U � ° = a p Q L i In c d - O U C a O� u a cn L ) O) C N N N LLJ d O 4- U p Q 0 ® Q C L �° ® d o m .- d} -- ,_ _c (D z a N " N X s o L O p >1 ® Q. v ~ U Q LLa (1) Q -QN� d O d N c t }. 0 o.� ~o v �� d (1) '� LU O A) d Q .0) N O 'r U r— U 0 u S a u 3 o_ {- }- S N c N .O U d a t d U N 'O LO In M LO N 00 O 14- O O rn Q U d 0 d a m x O m 0 d O O LO M d 61 4_ L 0 N C6 C S a_ d L O i- L 0 CL 0 Q v� C: N ni O SI N Wa f Vii: 7 7 U n S 05 to O S1 d m C N C O U 0 S u V N b 3 3 a .}C } N C d u U t7 CL V U N 'C3 (`•• LO M N 00 O O O LC) Q w M X O ca O M.. O V ° 10 M dQ) d O N a { t d. _T O U 4- i-- i O it N CL b .s7 K in Ol M ,ej •" d C d N C LE N S 5= O N C N -0 U E i} C d w t TE 'U v- N Ej O } OU N OV S 0, L >_ O. {- N s L C d dC r C C u+ N N O N II. s= L N � p O U O � C O} "O U .O N OV _ _ O 0 -d d o o s L- 2: X N N .0 is-• N d oV'i r} s u d ° C � N N d N sr O N fi d N •mil .L •� } U L O} o N H L} .- c 4-- tA L o . C S d c+ O +" S N Ld N t_^ O N C} } u N d } t}n 4= ° N a °c 3 i •� C v}i to N d d d o '+- u° o °N 0 3° d o d >~ ° O �.. O L (� n. .> L V1 C LA O t- L - LM S .> +- -0. . i o -Q 3 T L+ X° N o c d c 0 1 N s N w CL 0 a o o s d o 3 tn X u OL � '�" d N �- X +d- N N L p� to *m O 'fl iL-' N } S- d U 5 +- C to OL V +- O d o} N S c N d OL Q C N N S Cd S b 4n 0 CL -b O Cl- ) o t4 a t_^ o- ° 0 4- ca O N x N Q 4- N f- N .- Ln 0 S u V N b 3 3 a .}C } N C d u U t7 CL V U N 'C3 (`•• LO M N 00 O O O LC) Q w M X O ca O M.. O V ° 10 M dQ) d O N a { t d. _T O U 4- i-- i O it N CL b .s7 K N S.2 p a •ry � k U O 2 06 Ln O Q rn C N C O U U D C O U D k= O O V 0 Ln O O O O• N e O > � N � ti > 0, O O > Q C U C .3 a a O -0 U 0 o U .C: O U C > > C• -4� > 0 > o O Q -a - D o > 0 Ll Ev 0 O > O O O) W .- _ U E O U - C C a- Q. •C } O �} -0- U N O U O C 0) > O C 0 'N O c LL U V> O Q > > O > Q U -0 > 0 3 a) .0 U N O •� � O Q E > C > O > > > N 0, > E Q V �-- C, ~ O 79 0 U s a u 3 s d .n u a a (3j O U m LO M in N (b O d• O r O In O� 4 v 0 O r m x O co Q d O v 0 0 c� Q 0) 0 CL .L O N a s L C3 D_ .T CI } L 0 v- L O N GY O Q v c 0 C - _ �_ y O� 0 E > .n O 'X X c Q N O O U N = U O C O O. > 0 U 0 0 0),Q O 0 O) N O-0 O U O N •C O O C C C .. U U C Q� p O O> C Qx U O N O U O a O O w O > C 0 C O - Q- O 70 C7) N O O E O U O > 0U? .� Uv 0CD o � Q > — C O N (1) U O C N O > h Q ti O o c 0 > ) 0 C o �= 0 °',� oh C> o p C n Ln > > O Q Q ® U1 (U > O Q O N > 0 as C 0- > Z3 E ' r > O Q 02 O _C O 0-6 > E ce H > L O 0 0> C) C �c > O p O O7 A > _ > ® y C> Q N o> > O > c > > O C C L O U O 3 > OU > U E C 0 o ® 0m - C > O O > U %S Lon- E v 0. .- L O 0 0. 0 a� C C) u cEo C d g �,U ® > C N C > O C U 0 > O > > N � U a 0 �o > U o O »_ 3� Z a 00 L Q In 0 9) O. 0 O O N O � ._� O U top) Co 3 Q) ` �0Q vo,'- C N C•N C O? ® 30 Z 0 '� C O E o > X Q O U > > > X O O O >> N > ,U >> O x> O 5 > U > > > >-0 8 N O 0 ;C > Pi K° O N > > > CLC Q •- � N ®Qi ,N -c- > O L Q Nv^^♦♦ o •' � 1 � � � Z O W v> � L O Ch -- D O O U D C O U D k= O O V 0 Ln O O O O• N e O > � N � ti > 0, O O > Q C U C .3 a a O -0 U 0 o U .C: O U C > > C• -4� > 0 > o O Q -a - D o > 0 Ll Ev 0 O > O O O) W .- _ U E O U - C C a- Q. •C } O �} -0- U N O U O C 0) > O C 0 'N O c LL U V> O Q > > O > Q U -0 > 0 3 a) .0 U N O •� � O Q E > C > O > > > N 0, > E Q V �-- C, ~ O 79 0 U s a u 3 s d .n u a a (3j O U m LO M in N (b O d• O r O In O� 4 v 0 O r m x O co Q d O v 0 0 c� Q 0) 0 CL .L O N a s L C3 D_ .T CI } L 0 v- L O N GY O Q V) v� O ss a) N :J U .0 0 N O .0 a ni c a N r. 0 U W W N V 0 U = U C U C Q) U C Q. O C C' O O Z3 - 0 C> �` O 0 O N C C a) N O N U O a) O C F O U U— U U O O U a) 0 u O o O C L C L 0 a) O g) 0) -0 C C o 0 ,� I � U N> N a) o ago Q U U) O U N Q U Q a) O U c T: _ U v N a) o V a) C U O E N >0 O U� N (D (D •g > y`2 a O > O U Q U a) C e O U p` U N _N •Q . a) O U e N O O ^p^`` Q U U a) U O V� 3 V o � nQ. U l� Q- a) C:�O UN a) d? r �•o -C 0) e 3 u s E E a; 0 .— a) ,- Wrr �' ,1L -,E L •�eo �( O 'O V X U u u oo�E° �3 ��v c� aia��0) D C�oQ u Z) Cp �o� "� Q) a) >0 °o �� _�> o tea`, X003 °}a o° a) o N s o 0) u� C� D a Q C U C •- CL :: d N- E _ Q) C O U O a) p o I e O a) 0.- e w a) O o 0 c- D ) 0 �'� U o o u "= D~ a- o a�^Uo �o ���rnrn�L3u,,au-o C v L N C •b VI o— N N e 2 O /1 L U L N Q .0 Q) — C U Z) �= L •_� W 0-5 .e Q O p D N �0 V C a N Q U U E nC^` U ti O o t U> u e W o O U 3 N o 0 0-O e 0. o o o e� a° O &� o e N U) U C y N U '= D - O O D N � - w D,® O a) Q U C C 0 C a) C - u 0) -0 0) m0 '" O a) C U a) U Q O O C >, C a C e O a) 'vi N �O w N u U O U' o 'r S a) C N O U Q _0 a) -U o U tA O O 0) U UC D d - 2: ®, C. U D �N - tmC: `��E C) O O e a U U O -U U N Cp N O j a) O o D 0> C e a) d g D Q U a) s U N O — u L U _C D) Q) Q) ut •--_ ON C Q e E Q_ O O c a E E U O .Q o U ON C: - u O o 0 U O O D U '� E U a) Q) C N CL o U a) w U E .L D U a) a) D D-C D N •- -C L7 a) c C 0 'U U �- C O O O O U� U D O D a) U CL U V O D O '° O .- Q) r r � O C(D D) •N C - U> N v a) C ° _p O L7 U U 3 4 �.�.� ° o ®0 o QZ oZ �e a) o.; CO a) a) O o o N �O '� a N a) d) D CL N3a� � Q Q) C C O O D A> C: L N o � Q 2: � C U (D O U U U � C) 0 LOa) C C) E Q U N - a) U C C c •E a o N � N m N C — C5 o�� 0.9 U N V p N C U O ^U` a) U W C N U C O 30 �� °o.� n Q -0 U U N a) -•- U U) O •O U C) 0) a) r0 a) Q O a C Q � o O C c C U U C '- •N Q N 0 O u O U N 3 r a. s c N v tl- M ti ) N r co O v d r O Ln U cs rn 0 0 v d- M X O C.0 0. 0 v 4- O 00 M d c� 0 a. O N 0 s i d o.. {O G L 0 L O 0. C( 0 0 W ..a aj L. O W w N U 0 Z w N 0 C s+ N C O LOA �$ O zi C C I O O Q. Q C O _O Qi •� N .0 `n d.! •C U U � N � C O U E U : O CL - 3 U >, O C a E Q 0 C O O O 0) g u a _D h U G C N O 0 ` Eau ©°; 3 u ^ M - C7 p) U C v C C N O 0. U — E 0 O � 3 'NMQ v N 0) � � O O _ v a 't7 O) U O C C ,m a E o o � O U U H Cr .0 o a_o r 'A E U U 0) e O O.> O N D ^l U / W •— W .�e C 'L Q O UU A Q Q •— N e' b.f ;t 0 0 a U Q C) O N to � Fgwe O � N � E C to _ C) N N O O1 � Q O 0 0 �I 0 C� N � N _> N O O O O C C w O Uli W dS Q O O �G U �O O Q Q � � N�•O N �- 3 0 > N a Q� U O O ^p, ^E^`` W W 4- U N � N N 0 O C O U Q O � O L C N N (U U N Q Q. C O O CL *- CD C � ,Q O .c Q O C 'c C O � N � F` C m I O u d u 3 a s t O c N u U 6 n. Q) s tl V Al LO lL ) M LC) N co O O d V d' r M X 0 m O CL 0 4- O c� 0 0 N a S n t1 0 v- t i 0 a o� L O .a Q c o N N > �� _ O - 3 c o O O O p O O O CL Q O OU co U O o E h N o ; ^ a) W W f0 W C '�., p O a� O p -p > N U Q N O c Ln O, j U o o C E — O O N N o 3 L � O 0 N O o N�•r ^ U O o �UQ Qa) N axi ru O O O •«- .0 •'" c > p - 'QD > Q v 'v Q > •` O O> O N'C �.c > t4 =; N O U .� O O) o -� fa O O c O O N O O E E '+- v- O O C Z5 .w v o v CL N ?^ O 0— (D -o v U D Q i c O O O rLa .S O O N O O O> O N c C N o 0 O O + C L o o U s k @ U a O p) N q) v w E 5 O � .0 O O U o •O N O O L L5 > U o .0 O ,_ -0 U F- to Q O O 0 O rLv c � U ' C 0 N I O u d u 3 a s t O c N u U 6 n. Q) s tl V Al LO lL ) M LC) N co O O d V d' r M X 0 m O CL 0 4- O c� 0 0 N a S n t1 0 v- t i 0 a o� L O .a Q ft� .3 � 5��.15g1St i N W .G cv O (U N 3 U O T ots 0 .Q Q c N C 0 U m LO v w 0 O N _M O .- O O .^ Q CO O Q o'er D� O = o U °c-OU to td z O N O cn O N 0 Q 'C Q O N vj Q O m. W 0) 0- cif Q U N c O C ` Q 0 OU �U N U zi zi N O c E t3 U O O C O Q Q c 07 _� Q O 01- N Q ? Q �Q C: -O p U N V Q v- U a 0 0 O W _ X .- O C Q '0 Q O N _ Q N j Ln O N E a� 'U 3 x N O C a E O C O �C - N N O f Q Q� O VUl N O U Q f p O -0 U O � N U C p C Q y O i O O U X O N .� Ul Q O O O O C O. N O O O C a C U O O t w- O O 6 C Q O O C o U 'O U p C O O v 0 Q u 0 o "= p O Xa E O - N tn G � : O O w N C ,E N _ N v � O v � m LO v w 0 O N _M O .- O O .^ Q CO O Q o'er D� O = o U °c-OU to td z O N O cn O N 0 t.1 Q O N vj Q O m. W 0) 0- cif Q U N c O C ` Q 0 OU �U I 0 u s u d 3 y> } a u c N n� V 0 u b LO LO M N w 0 lzr O LOr O rn Q U d m 0 C. O M X 0 m O a_ 0 Q 0 Q 0 N L O N O LU n_ S 0 L O 0. L 0 .n This Page Intentionally Left Blank ORDINANCE ORDINANCE OF THE TOWN OF LOS GATOS AMENDING THE TOWN CODE EFFECTING A ZONE CHANGE FROM R -11) & C -2 TO R -1D:PD FOR PROPERTY AT 219 BEAN AVENUE (APNs 510 -44 -028, 510 -44 -083, & 510 -44 -084) THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF LOS GATOS DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I The Town Code of the Town of Los Gatos is hereby amended to change the zoning and supersede Resolution 1985 -47 on property at 219 Bean Avenue (Santa Clara County Assessor Parcel Numbers 510 -44 -028, 510 -44 -083, & 510 -44 -084) as shown on the map attached hereto as Exhibit A, and is part of this Ordinance, from R -1D (Single - Family Residential, Downtown) and C -2 (Central Business District) to R -1D:PD (Single - Family Residential, Downtown, Planned Development). SECTION II The PD (Planned Development Overlay) zone established by this Ordinance authorizes the following: 1. Church and school services, uses, and activities. 2. Construction of a two - story, 34' -2" tall, 14,136 square foot junior high school building; covered seating area; 1,200 square foot addition to the lower school building; and church - related residential structure. 3. Landscaping, parking, and other site improvements shown and required on the Official Development Plans attached hereto as Exhibit C. 4. Uses as described in the applicant's letter attached hereto as Exhibit B. 5. Lot merger between APNs 510 -44 -028 & 510 -44 -084. 6. Superseding Resolution 1985 -47 adopting Conditional Use Pennit U -84 -017. 7. Uses permitted are those specified in the underlying R -11) (Single- Family Residential, Downtown) zone by Sections 29.40.725 (Permitted Uses) and 29.20.185 (Conditional Uses) of the Zoning Ordinance, as those sections exist at the time of the adoption of this Ordinance, or as they may be amended in the future, subject to any restrictions or other Page 1 of 25 omarff 1 1 requirements specified elsewhere in this ordinance including, but not limited to, the Official Development Plan. However, no use listed in Section 29.20.185 is allowed unless specifically authorized by this Ordinance, or by Conditional Use Permit, SECTION III COMPLIANCE WITH OTHER DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS All provisions of the Town Code apply, except when the Official Development Plan specifically shows otherwise. SECTION IV Architecture and Site approval is required before construction and site improvement construction work is performed, whether or not a permit is required for the work and before any permit for construction is issued. Construction permits shall only be in a manner complying with Section 29.80.130 of the Town Code. SECTION V The attached Exhibit A (Map), Exhibit B (Description of Permitted Uses), and Exhibit C (Official Development Plans) are part of the Official Development Plan. The following Performance Standards must be complied with prior to issuance of any grading, or construction permits: TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT: (Planning Division) 1. MAXIMUM HOURS OF OPERATION: 7:30 am to 9:30 pm, seven days a week. Staff arrival and departure may exceed the hours limitation on a reasonable basis only. On limited occasions, religious services may occur outside these hours as described in the Applicant's Proposal (Exhibit B). 2. PERMITTED USES: Approved uses are ministry services for all ages, elementary school (grades K through 5), and junior high school (grades 6 through 8), and those described in the applicant's proposal attached hereto as Exhibit B, including Community Use of Facilities. Page 2 of 25 The school activities operate between late - August to mid -June. The use may make its facilities available to businesses, neighborhood, and community groups for holding meetings and similar activities. Uses of the church may include ministry services for all ages and church related residential uses (such as a rectory). Uses of the school may include a library and after school care center. 3. SPECIAL EVENTS: Special events are permitted with the approval of a special event permit from the Town of Los Gatos Police Department. 4. ARCHITECTURE AND SITE APPROVAL REQUIRED: Where applicable, a separate Architecture and Site application (A &S) shall be required for each phase of the Project. The Development Review Committee shall make the final deterinination on all A &S applications. 5. MAXIMUM HEIGHT: The maximum height of the junior high school building shall be 34% 2" feet or less. All other new buildings shall comply with the underlying R -11) zoning district height standards. 6. NUMBER OF CHURCH SEATS: Maximum number of seats used for worship shall not exceed 654. 7. PARKING: At least 105 parking spaces shall be provided onsite. 8. NUMBER OF STAFF: The maximum number of staff for the church and school combined is limited to 36. 9. NUMBER OF STUDENTS: The maximum number of students is limited to 315. 10. GENERAL: All existing trees shown on the plan and trees required to remain or to be planted are specific subjects of approval of this plan, and must remain on the site. 11. TREE REMOVAL PERMIT: A Tree Removal Permit shall be obtained for any trees to be removed, prior to the issuance of a building or grading permit. 12. TREE FENCING: Protective tree fencing shall be placed at the drip line of existing trees prior to issuance of demolition and building permits and shall remain through all phases of construction. Include a tree protection fencing plan with the construction plans. 13. ARBORIST RECOMMENDATIONS: All recommendations made by the Town's Consulting Arborist, Deborah Ellis, shall be implemented to eliminate or minimize construction- related impacts on the trees to be retained. Recommendations are listed in the May 1, 2012, October 17, 2012, and January 10, 2013, arborist's reports. The report also provides recommendations for Protection Measures before and during development, Page 3 of 25 encompassing fencing, removal of hardscape, demolition, work within tree canopies, etc. Tree protection specifications shall be printed on the construction plans. A Compliance Memorandum shall be prepared by the applicant and submitted with the building permit application detailing how the recommendations have or will be addressed. These recommendations must be incorporated in the building permit plans, and completed prior to issuance of a building permit where applicable. 14. RECYCLING: All wood, metal, glass and aluminum materials generated from the demolished structure shall be deposited to a company which will recycle the materials. Receipts from the company(s) accepting these materials, noting type and weight of material, shall be submitted to the Town prior to the Towns demolition inspection. 15. PARKING AND COMMUTING: The parish and school shall continue the communication program educating the parish community about parking options, asking school families to rideshare, and parishioners and their guests to be sensitive to the needs and concerns of the neighborhood residents. 16. LANDSCAPE WATER EFFICIENCY: This project is subject to the Town's Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance, Chapter 26, Article IV of the Town Code or the State Water Efficiency Ordinance, whichever is more restrictive. A fee as established by Town Council resolution shall be paid when the landscape, irrigation plans, and water calculations are submitted for review prior to the issuance of building permit. 17. TOWN INDEMNITY: Applicants are notified that Town Code Section 1.10.115 requires that any applicant who receives a permit or entitlement from the Town shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the Town and its officials in any action brought by a third party to overturn, set aside, or void the permit or entitlement. This requirement is a condition of approval of all such permits and entitlements whether or not expressly set forth in the approval, and may be secured to the satisfaction of the Town Attorney. (Building Division) 18. PERMITS REQUIRED: A building permit shall be required for the construction of the new Jr. High School building and a separate building permit to modify the existing Grammar Page 4 of 25 School building. Separate permits are required for electrical, mechanical, and plumbing work as necessary. 19. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: The Conditions of Approval must be blue -lined in frill on the cover sheet of the construction plans. A Compliance Memorandum shall be prepared and submitted with the building permit application detailing how the Conditions of Approval will be addressed. 20. SIZE OF PLANS: Four sets of construction plans, maximum size 24" x 36." 21. SOILS REPORT: A soils report, prepared to the satisfaction of the Building Official, containing foundation and retaining wall design recommendations is required to be submitted with the building permit application. This report shall be prepared by a licensed civil engineer specializing in soils mechanics. 22. FOUNDATION INSPECTIONS: A pad certificate prepared by a licensed civil engineer or land surveyor shall be submitted to the project building inspector at foundation inspection. This certificate shall certify compliance with the recommendations as specified in the soils report and that the building pad elevation, on -site retaining wall locations and elevations have been prepared according to approved plans. Horizontal and vertical controls shall be set and ( certified by a licensed surveyor or registered civil engineer for the following items: a. Building pad elevation b. Finish floor elevation c. Foundation comer locations d. Retaining Walls 23. BACKWATER VALVE: The scope of this project may require the installation of a sanitary sewer backwater valve per Town Ordinance 6.50.025. Please provide information on the plans if a backwater valve is required and the location of the installation. The Town of Los Gatos Ordinance and West Valley Sanitation District (WVSD) requires backwater valves on drainage piping serving fixtures that have flood level rims less than 12- inches above the elevation of the next upstream manhole. 24. TITLE 24 — COMMERCIAL: The buildings shall be comply with the latest California Title 24 Accessibility Standards. Necessary work shall be first investigated by the design Architect, then confirmed by Town staff. Page 5 of 25 25, SPECIAL INSPECTIONS: When a special inspection is required by CBC Section 1704, the Architect or Engineer of record shall prepare an inspection program that shall be submitted to the Building Official for approval prior to issuance of the building permit. The Town Special Inspection form must be completely filled -out, signed by all requested parties, and be blue - lined on the construction plans. Special Inspection forms are available from the Building Division Service Counter or online at www.losgatosca.gov/building 26. NONPOINT SOURCE POLLUTION STANDARDS SHEET: The Town standard Santa Clara County Valley Nonpoint Source Pollution Control Program Sheet (or Clean Bay Sheet 2406) shall be part of the plan submittal as the second page. The specification sheet is available at the Building Division Service Counter for a fee of $2 or at San Jose Blue Print for a fee. 27. NPDES -C.3 DATA FORM: A copy of the NPDES C.3 Data Form (updated based on the final construction drawings) must be blue -lined in full on the plans. In the event that this data differs significantly from any Planning approvals, the Town may require recertification of the project's storm water treatment facilities prior to release of the Building Permit, 28. PLANS: The construction plans shall be prepared under the direct supervision of a licensed Architect or Engineer. (Business and Professionals Code Section 5538) 29. APPROVALS REQUIRED: The project requires the following departments and agencies approval before issuing a building permit: a. Community Development - Planning Division: Jennifer Savage at (408) 399 -5702 b. Engineering/Parks & Public Works Department: Maziar Bozorginia at 395 -3460 c. Santa Clara County Fire Department: (408) 378 -4010 d. West Valley Sanitation District: (408) 378 -2407 e. Local School District: The Town will forward the paperwork to the appropriate school district(s) for processing. A copy of the paid receipt is required prior to permit issuance. 30. =FAIR QUALITY MITIGATION MEASURE -1: Basic construction measures. To limit the project's construction- related dust and criteria pollutant emissions, the following BAAQMD- recommended Basic Construction Mitigation Measures shall be included in the project's grading plan, building plans, and contract specifications: Page 6 of 25 a. All exposed surfaces (e.g., parking areas, staging areas, soil piles, graded areas, and unpaved access roads) shall be watered two times per day. b. All haul trucks transporting soil, sand, or other loose material off -site shall be covered. c. All visible mud or dirt track -out onto adjacent public roads shall be removed using wet power vacuum street sweepers at least once per day. The use of dry power sweeping is prohibited. d. All vehicle speeds on unpaved roads shall be limited to 15 mph. e. All roadways, driveways, and sidewalks to be paved shall be completed as soon as possible. f. Idling times shall be minimized either by shutting equipment off when not in use or reducing the maximum idling time to five minutes (as required by the California airborne toxics control measure Title 13, Section 2185 of California Code of Regulations [CCR]). Clear signage shall be provided for construction workers at all access points. g. All construction equipment shall be maintained and properly tuned in accordance with manufacturer's specifications. All equipment shall be checked by a certified mechanic and detennined to be running in proper condition prior to operation. h. Post a publicly visible sign with the telephone number and person to contact at the Town regarding dust complaints. This person shall respond and take corrective action within 48 hours. The BAAQMD's phone number shall also be visible- to ensure compliance with applicable regulations. 31. *CULTURAL RESOURCES MITIGATION MEASURE -1: Alert Construction Personnel. Construction personnel involved with earthmoving shall be alerted to the potential for the discovery of prehistoric materials and in particular, concentrations of historic artifacts. Prehistoric archaeological resources could include but not be limited to the following: darker than surrounding soils of a friable nature, concentrations of stone, bone or fresh water shellfish, artifacts of these materials, and evidence of fire (ash, charcoal, fire altered earth or rock) and of course, burials, both human and animal. Page 7 of 25 32. *CULTURAL RESOURCES MITIGATION MEASURE -2: Halt of Construction If Archaeological Traces Are Encountered. In the event that archaeological traces are encountered, all construction within a 20 -foot radius of the find shall be halted, the Community Development Director shall be notified, and an archaeologist shall be retained to examine the find and make appropriate recommendations. 33. *CULTURAL RESOURCES MITIGATION MEASURE -3: Plan for Eligible Resources. In the event that it appears further earthmoving will affect a resource eligible for the California Register of Historic Resource (CRHR), a plan for evaluation of the resource through limited hand excavation should be submitted to the Town's Community Development Department for approval. If evaluative testing demonstrates that the project will affect a CRHR eligible resource, a plan for the mitigation of impacts to the resource should be submitted to the Community Development Department for approval before construction is allowed inside the zone designated as archaeologically sensitive. 34. *CULTURAL RESOURCES MITIGATION MEASURE -4: Preliminary Archaeological Report. If the Community Development Director finds that the archaeological find is not a significant resource, work will resume only after the submittal of a preliminary archaeological report and after provisions for reburial and ongoing monitoring are accepted. Provisions for identifying descendants of a deceased Native American and for reburial will follow the protocol set forth in CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5(e). If the site is found to be a significant archaeological site, a mitigation program will be prepared and submitted to the Community Development Director for consideration and approval, in conformance with the protocol set forth in Public Resources Code Section 21083.2. 35. *CULTURAL RESOURCES MITIGATION MEASURE -5: Final Archaeological Report. A final report shall be prepared when a find is determined to be a significant archaeological site, and /or when Native American remains are found on the site. The final report will include background information on the completed work, a description and list of identified resources, the disposition and curation of these resources, any testing, other recovered information, and conclusions. 36. *HAZARDS MITIGATION MEASURE -1: Abatement of Lead -Based Paints. Prior to proposed building demolition, construction finish materials that are suspect for containing lead - based paint will be tested, and pending laboratory analysis, will not be subjected to any Page 8 of 25 process which renders them friable unless proper engineering controls and worker protection procedures are initiated. 37. *NOISE MITIGATION MEASURE -l: Noise Barrier. To reduce excess noise from the playfield activity at the residence at 30 Tait Avenue, the project applicant will construct a six -foot high solid board fence along the property line between the playfield and the home at 30 Tait Avenue. The barrier height is in reference to the nearest playfield ground elevation. Figure 3 of Attached 5 of the Initial Study delineates the location of the noise control barrier. The fence will be constructed of minimum 1 -inch thick (nom.) redwood boards nailed tight such that no gaps are visible. Cracks, gaps, knotholes are no permitted. No openings are permitted between the upper fence components and the ground. 38. *NOISE MITIGATION MEASURE -2: Recommended Construction Measures. Although there would be no significant noise impact under CEQA or construction - related noise mitigation required under CEQA, project - related demolition and construction noise at the site could be reduced by using quiet or "new technology" equipment. The greatest potential for noise abatement of current equipment should be the quieting of exhaust noise by use of improved mufflers. It is recommended that all internal combustion engines used at the 1 project site be equipped with a type of muffler recommended by the vehicle manufacturer. In addition, all equipment should be in good mechanical condition so as to minimize noise created by faulty or poorly maintained engine, drive -train and other components. Demolition and construction noise could also be mitigated by the following: a. Schedule construction operations that comply with the limits of the Town of Los Gatos Noise Ordinance. b. Limit the use of equipment close to sensitive receptor properties. c. Utilizing temporary berms or noise barriers, such as lumber or other material stockpiles and the construction trailers or other non -noisy long -term structures. d. Place long -term stationary equipment as far away from the residential areas as possible. e. Keep mobile equipment (haul trucks, concrete trucks, etc.) off of local streets as much as possible. f A noise reduction benefit can also be achieved by appropriate selection of equipment utilized for various operations, subject to equipment availability and cost r Page 9 of 25 considerations, the following recommendations for minimizing impacts on the surrounding area are offered: i. Earth Removal: Use scrapers as much as possible for earth removal, rather than the noisier loaders and hauling trucks. ii. Ground Preparation: Use a motor grader rather than a bulldozer for final grading. iii. Building Construction: Power saws should be shielded or enclosed where practical to decrease noise emissions. Nail guns should be used where possible as they are less noisy than manual hammering. iv. Generators and Compressors: Use generators and compressors that are housed in acoustical enclosures rather than weather enclosures or none at all. TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE DIRECTOR OF PARKS AND PUBLIC WORKS: (Engineering Division) 39. GENERAL: All public improvements shall be made according to the latest adopted Town Standard Drawings and the Town Standard Specifications. All work shall conform to the applicable Town ordinances. The adjacent public right -of -way shall be kept clear of all job related dirt and debris at the end of the day. Dirt and debris shall not be washed into storm drainage facilities. The storing of goods and materials on the sidewalk and /or the street will not be allowed unless a special permit is issued. The developer's representative in charge shall be at the job site during all working hours. Failure to maintain the public right -of -way according to this condition may result in the Town performing the required maintenance at the developer's expense. 40. ENCROACHMENT PERMIT: All work in the public right -of -way will require a Construction Encroachment Permit. All work over $5,000 will require construction security. It is the responsibility of the applicant /developer to obtain any necessary encroachment pen-nits from affected agencies and private parties, including but not limited to, Pacific Gas and. Electric (PG &E), SBC, Comcast, Santa Clara Valley Water District, California Department of Transportation. Copies of any approvals or permits must be submitted to the Town Engineering Department prior to releasing of any permit. Page 10 of 25 41. PUBLIC WORKS INSPECTIONS: The developer or his representative shall notify the Engineering Inspector at least twenty -four (24) hours before starting any work pertaining to on -site drainage facilities, grading or paving, and all work in the Town's right -of -way. Failure to do so will result in rejection of work that went on without inspection. 42. RESTORATION OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS: The developer shall repair or replace all existing improvements not designated for removal that are damaged or removed because of developer's operations. Improvements such as, but not limited to: curbs, gutters, sidewalks, driveways, signs, pavements, raised pavement markers, thennoplastic pavement markings, etc. shall be repaired and replaced to a condition equal to or better than the original condition. Existing improvement to be repaired or replaced shall be at the direction of the Engineering Construction Inspector, and shall comply with all Title 24 Disabled Access provisions. Developer shall request a walk- through with the Engineering Construction Inspector before the start of construction to verify existing conditions. 43. SITE SUPERVISION: The General Contractor shall provide qualified supervision on the job site at all times during construction. 44. STREET /SIDEWALK CLOSURE: Any proposed blockage or partial closure of the sidewalk requires an encroachment permit. Special provisions such as limitations on works hours, protective enclosures, or other means to facilitate public access in a safe mariner may be required. 45. PLAN CHECK FEES: Plan check fees shall be deposited with the Town prior to plan review at the Engineering Division of the Parks and Public Works Department 46. INSPECTION FEES: Inspection fees shall be deposited with the Town prior to issuance of any Permit or recordation of the Final Map. 47. DESIGN CHANGES: Any proposed changes to the approved plans shall be subject to the approval of the Town prior to altered work is started. The Applicant Project Engineer shall notify, in writing, the Town Engineer at least 72 hours in advance of all the proposed changes. Any approved changes shall be incorporated into the final "as- built" plans. 48. PLANS AND STUDIES: All required plans and studies shall be prepared by a Registered Professional Engineer in the State of California, and submitted to the Town Engineer for review and approval. Page 11 of 25 49. GRADING PERMIT: Grading permit is required for all site grading and drainage work except for exemptions listed in Section 12.20.015 of the Town Grading Ordinance. The grading permit application (with grading plans) shall be made to the Engineering Division of the Parks & Public Works Department located at 41 Miles Avenue. The grading plans shall include final grading, drainage, retaining wall location, driveway, utilities and interim erosion control. Grading plans shall list earthwork quantities and a table of existing and proposed impervious areas. Unless specifically allowed by the Director of Parks and Public Works, the grading permit will be issued concurrently with the building permit. The grading permit is for work outside the building footprint(s). A separate building permit, issued by the Building Department on E. Main Street is needed for grading within the building footprint. 50. CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT: Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, it shall be the sole responsibility of the owner /applicant to obtain any and all proposed or required easements and /or permissions necessary to perform the grading herein proposed. Proof of agreement/approval is required prior to issuance of any Permit. 51. DRAINAGE STUDY: Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, the following drainage studies shall be submitted to and approved by the Town Engineer: A drainage study of the project including diversions, off-site areas that drain onto and /or through the project, and justification of any diversions; a drainage study evidencing that proposed drainage patterns will not overload existing storm drains; and detailed drainage studies indicating how the project grading, in conjunction with the drainage conveyance systems including applicable swales, chamlels, street flows, catch basins, storm drains, and flood water retarding, will allow building pads to be safe from inundation from rainfall runoff which may be expected from all stores up to and including the theoretical 100 -year flood. 52. TREE REMOVAL: Copies of all necessary tree removal permits shall be provided prior to issuance of a grading permit/building permit. 53. SURVEYING CONTROLS: Horizontal and vertical controls shall be set and certified by a licensed surveyor or registered civil engineer qualified to practice land surveying, for the following items: a. Retaining wall - -top of wall elevations and locations b. Toe and top of cut and fill slopes Page 12 of 25 54. PAD CERTIFICATION: A letter from a licensed land surveyor shall be provided stating that the building foundation was constructed in accordance with the approved plans shall be provided subsequent to foundation construction and prior to construction on the structure. The pad certification shall address both vertical and horizontal foundation placement. 55. PRECONSTRUCTION MEETING: Prior to issuance of any permit or the commencement of any site work, the general contractor shall: a. Along with the project applicant, attend a pre - construction meeting with the Town Engineer to discuss the project conditions of approval, working hours, site maintenance and other construction matters; b. Acknowledge in writing that they have read and understand the project conditions of approval, and will make certain that all project sub- contractors have read and understand them prior to commencing work and that a copy of the project conditions of approval will be posted on site at all times during construction. 56. RETAINING WALLS: A building permit, issued by the Building Department at 110 E. Main Street, may be required for site retaining walls. Walls are not reviewed or approved by the Engineering Division of Parks and Public Works during the grading permit plan review process. 57. CERTIFICATE OF LOT MERGER: A Certificate of Lot Merger shall be recorded. Two copies of the legal description for exterior boundary of the merged parcel and a plat map (8- 'h in. X 11 in.) shall be submitted to the Engineering Division of the Parks & Public Works Department for review and approval. The submittal shall include closure calculations, title reports less than 90 clays old and the appropriate fee. The certificate shall be recorded before any pen-nits may be issued. 58. SOILS REPORT: One copy of the soils report shall be submitted with the grading permit application. The soils report shall include specific criteria and standards governing site grading, drainage, pavement design, retaining wall design and erosion control. The reports shall be signed and "wet stamped" by the engineer or geologist, in conformance with Section 6735 of the California Business and Professions Code. 59. SOILS REVIEW: Prior to issuance of any permit, the applicant's soils engineer shall review the final grading and drainage plans to ensure that designs for foundations, retaining walls, Page 13 of 25 site grading, and site drainage are in accordance with their recommendations and the peer review comments. The applicant's soils engineer's approval shall then be conveyed to the Town either by letter or by signing the plans. 60. SOILS ENGINEER CONSTRUCTION OBSERVATION: During construction, all excavations and grading shall be inspected by the applicant's soils engineer prior to placement of concrete and /or backfill so they can verify that the actual conditions are as anticipated in the design -level geotechnical report, and recommend appropriate changes in the recommendations contained in the report, if necessary. The results of the construction observation and testing should be documented in an "as- built" letter /report prepared by the applicants' soils engineer and submitted to the Town before final release of any occupancy permit is granted. 61. WATER DESIGN: Water plans prepared by SJWC must be reviewed and approved prior to issuance of any permit. 62. FRONTAGE IMPROVEMENTS: Applicant shall be required to improve the project's public frontage to current Town Standards. These improvements may include but not limited to curb, gutter, sidewalk, driveway approaches, curb ramps, traffic signal, street lighting (upgrade and /or repaint) etc. 63. UTILITIES: The Developer shall install all new, relocated, or temporarily removed utility services, including telephone, electric power and all other communications lines underground, as required by Town Code Section 27.50.015(b). All new utility services shall be placed underground. Underground conduit shall be provided for cable television service. Applicant is required to obtain approval of all proposed utility alignments from any and all utility service providers. The Town of Los Gatos does not approve or imply approval for final alignment or design of these facilities. 64. SIDEWALK CLOSURE: Any proposed blockage or partial closure of the sidewalk requires an encroachment permit. Special provisions such as limitations on works hours, protective enclosures, or other means to facilitate public access in a safe manner may be required. 65. SIDEWALK REPAIR: The developer shall repair and replace to existing Town standards any sidewalk damaged now or during construction of this project. Sidewalk repair shall match existing color, texture and design, and shall be constructed per Town Standard Details. Page 14 of 25 The limits of sidewalk repair will be determined by the Engineering Construction Inspector during the constiliction phase of the project. 66. CURB AND GUTTER: The developer shall repair and replace to existing Town standards any curb and gutter damaged now or during construction of this project. New curb and gutter shall be constructed per Town Standard Details. The limits of curb and gutter repair will be determined by the Engineering Construction Inspector during the construction phase of the project. 67. DRIVEWAY APPROACH: The developer shall install commercial driveway approach. The new driveway approach shall be constructed per Town Standard Details. 68. FENCING: Any fencing proposed within 200 -feet of an intersection shall comply with Town Code Section §23.10.080. 69. SIGHT TRIANGLE AND TRAFFIC VIEW AREA: Any proposed improvements, including but not limiting to trees and hedges, will need to abide by Town Code Section 23.10.080, 26.10.065, 29.40.030, 70. AS -BUILT PLANS: After completion of the construction of all work, the original plans shall have all changes (change orders and field changes) clearly marked. The "as- built" plans shall again be signed and "wet- stamped" by the civil engineer who prepared the plans, attesting to the changes. The original "as- built" plans shall be review and approved the Engineering Inspector. A Mylar and AutoCAD disk of the approved "as- built" plans shall be provided to the Town before the Faithfiil Performance Security or Occupancy Permit is released. The AutoCAD file shall include only the following information and shall conform to the layer naming convention: a) Building Outline, Layer: BLDG- OUTLINE; b) Driveway, Layer: DRIVEWAY; c) Retaining Wall, Layer: RETAINING WALL; d) Swimming Pool, Layer: SWIMMING -POOL; e) Temlis Court, Layer: TENNIS- COURT; f) Property Line, Layer: PROPERTY -LINE; g) Contours, Layer: NEWCONTOUR. All as -built digital files must be on the same coordinate basis as the Town's survey control network and shall be submitted in AutoCAD version 2000 or higher. 71. TRAFFIC STUDY: Any development of land use that generates greater traffic impacts than those assumed in the St. Mary's School Expansion Traffic Study (dated July 12, 2012) shall require an updated traffic study utilizing a methodology approved by the Town. The Town Page 15 of 25 may impose additional conditions on the applicant or development based on the updated Town - approved traffic study. 72. CONSTRUCTION TRAFFIC: All construction traffic and related vehicular routes shall be submitted for review and approval by the Town Engineer prior to issuance of permit. 73. TRAFFIC IMPACT MITIGATION FEE: The developer shall pay a fee proportional to the project's share of transportation improvement needed to serve cumulative development within the Town of Los Gatos. The fee amount will be based upon the Town Council resolution in effect at the time the building permit application is made. The fee shall be paid before the building permit is issued. The traffic impact mitigation fee for this project, using the current fee schedule and the preliminary plans is $11,494.98. The final fee shall be calculated from the final plans using the rate schedule in effect at the time of the building permit application, using a trip generation rate based on commercial use. 74. TRAFFIC IMPACT COMMUNITY BENEFIT: The developer is required to provide Community Benefit based on the Town Traffic Impact Policy. 75. CONSTRUCTION STREET PARKING: No vehicle having a manufacture's rated gross vehicle weight exceeding ten thousand (10,000) pounds shall be allowed to park on the portion of a street which abuts property in a residential zone without prior to approval from the Town Engineer. 76. TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN: The project sponsor will be required to work with the Engineering Division of the Parks and Public Works Department to develop a traffic control plan for incorporation into the construction bid documents (specifications), and this plan will include, but not be limited to, the following measures: a. Construction activities shall be strategically timed and coordinated to minimize traffic disruption for schools, residents, businesses, special events, and other projects in the area. The schools located on the haul route shall be contacted to help with the coordination of the trucking operation to minimize traffic disruption. b. Flag persons shall be placed at locations necessary to control one -way traffic flow. All flag persons shall have the capability of communicating with each other to coordinate the operation. Page 16 of 25 c. Prior to construction, advance notification of all affected residents and emergency services shall be made regarding one -way operation, specifying dates and hours of operation. 77. HAULING OF SOIL: Hauling of soil on or off -site shall not occur during the morning or evening peals periods (between 7:00 a.m. and 9:00 a.m. and between 4:00 p.m. and 6:00 p,m.). Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the developer shall work with the Town Building and Engineering Department Engineering Inspectors to devise a traffic control plan to ensure safe and efficient traffic flow under periods when soil is hauled on or off the project site. This may include, but is not limited to provisions for the developer /owner to place construction notification signs noting the dates and time of construction and hauling activities, or providing additional traffic control. Coordination with other significant projects in the area may also be required. Cover all trucks hauling soil, sand, and other loose debris or require all trucks to maintain at least two feet of freeboard. 78. CONSTRUCTION NOISE: Between the hours of 8:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m., weekdays and 9:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. weekends and holidays, construction, alteration or repair activities shall be allowed. No individual piece of equipment shall produce a noise level exceeding eighty -five ( (85) dBA at twenty -five (25) feet. If the device is located within a structure on the property, the measurement shall be made at distances as close to twenty -five (25) feet from the device as possible. The noise level at any point outside of the property plane shall not exceed eighty -five (85) dBA. 79. CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT PLAN: The Applicant shall submit a construction management plan that shall incorporate at a minimum the Earth Movement Plan, Traffic Control Plan, Project Schedule, site security fencing, employee parking, construction staging area, construction trailer, and proposed outhouse locations. 80. WVSD (West Valley Sanitation District): Sanitary sewer laterals are televised by West Valley Sanitation District and approved by the Town of Los Gatos before they are used or reused. Sanitary Sewer Clean -out is required for each property at the property line or location specify by the Town. 81. SANITARY SEWER BACKWATER VALVE: Drainage piping serving fixtures which have flood level rims less than twelve (12) inches (304.8 ruin) above the elevation of the next upstream manhole and /or flushing inlet cover at the public or private sewer system serving Page 17 of 25 such drainage piping shall be protected from backflow of sewage by installing an approved type backwater valve. Fixtures above such elevation shall not discharge through the backwater valve, unless first approved by the Administrative. The Town shall not incur any liability or responsibility for damage resulting from a sewer overflow where the property owner or other person has failed to install a backwater valve as defined in the Uniform Plumbing Code adopted by the Town and maintain such device in a functional operation condition. Evidence of West Sanitation District's decision on whether a backwater device is needed shall be provided prior to issuance of a building permit. 82. BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES (BMP's): Best Management Practices (BMPs) shall be maintained and be placed for all areas that have been graded or disturbed and for all material, equipment and /or operations that need protection. Removal of BMPs (temporary removal during construction activities) shall be placed at the end of each working day. 83. STORMWATER DEVELOPMENT RUNOFF: All new development and redevelopment projects subject to the Stormwater development runoff requirements. Every applicant shall submit a stormwater control plan and implement conditions of approval that reduce stormwater pollutant discharges through the construction, operation and maintenance of treatment measures and other appropriate source control and site design measures. Increases in runoff volume and flows shall be managed in accordance with the development runoff requirements 84. SITE DESIGN MEASURES: All projects must incorporate the following measures to the maximum extent practicable: a. Protect sensitive areas and minimize changes to the natural topography. b. Minimize impervious surface areas. c. Direct roof downspouts to vegetated areas where feasible. d. Use permeable pavement surfaces where feasible. e. Use landscaping to treat stormwater. 85. DUST CONTROL: Blowing dust shall be reduced by timing construction activities so that paving and building construction begin as soon as possible after completion of grading, and by landscaping disturbed soils as soon as possible. Further, water trucks shall be present and in use at the construction site. All portions of the site subject to blowing dust shall be watered as often as deemed necessary by the Town, or a minimum of three times daily, or Page 18 of 25 apply (non- toxic) soil stabilizers on all unpaved access roads, parking areas, and staging areas at construction sites in order to insure proper control of blowing dust for the duration of the project. Watering on public streets shall not occur. Streets will be cleaned by street sweepers or by hand as often as deemed necessary by the Town Engineer, or at least once a day. Watering associated with on -site construction activity shall take place between the hours of 8 a.m. and 5 p.m. and shall include at least one late- afternoon watering to minimize the effects of blowing dust. All public streets soiled or littered due to this constriction activity shall be cleaned and swept on a daily basis during the workweek to the satisfaction of the Town. Demolition or earthwork activities shall be halted when wind speeds (instantaneous gusts) exceed 25 MPH. All trucks hauling soil, sand, or other loose debris shall be covered. 86. CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES: All construction shall conform to the latest requirements of the CASQA Stormwater Best Management Practices Handbooks for Construction Activities and New Development and Redevelopment, the ABAG Manual of Standards for Erosion & Sediment Control Measures, the Town's grading and erosion control ordinance and other generally accepted engineering practices for erosion control as required by the ( Town Engineer when undertaking construction activities. 87. SITE DRAINAGE: Rainwater leaders shall be discharged to splash blocks. No through curb drains will be allowed. Any storm drain inlets (public or private) directly connected to public storm system shall be stenciled /signed with appropriate "NO DUMPING - Flows to Bay" NPDES required language. On -site drainage systems for all projects shall include one of the alternatives included in section C.3.i of the Municipal Regional NPDES Permit. These include storm water reuse via cisterns or rain barrels, directing runoff from impervious surfaces to vegetated areas and use of permeable surfaces. If dry wells are to be used they shall be placed 10' minimum from adjacent property line and /or right of way. 88. STORM WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN: A stoin water management shall be included with the grading permit application for all Group 1 and Group 2 projects as defined in the amended provisions C.3 of the Municipal Regional Stormwater NPDES Permit, Order R2- 2009 -074. The plan shall delineate source control measures and BMP's together with the sizing calculations. The plan shall be certified by a professional pre - qualified by the Town. In the event that storm water measures proposed on the Planning approval differ significantly Page 19 of 25 from those certified on the Building/Grading Permit, the Town may require a modification of the Planning approval prior to release of the Building Permit. The applicant may elect to have the Planning submittal certified to avoid this possibility. 89. AGREEMENT FOR STORMWATER BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE OBLIGATIONS: The property owner shall enter into an agreement with the Town for maintenance of the stormwater filtration devices required to be installed on this project by Town's Stormwater Discharge Permit and all current amendments or modifications. The agreement will specify that certain routine maintenance shall be performed by the property owner and will specify device maintenance reporting requirements. The agreement will also specify routine inspection requirements, permits and payment of fees. The agreement shall be recorded prior to release of any occupancy permits. 90. SILT AND MUD IN PUBLIC RIGHT -OF -WAY: It is the responsibility of contractor and home owner to make sure that all dirt tracked into the public right -of -way is cleaned up on a daily basis. Mud, silt, concrete and other construction debris SHALL NOT be washed into the Town's storm drains. 91. GREASE TRAPS: Meet all requirements of the Santa Clara County Health Department and West Valley Sanitation District for the interception, separation or pretreatment of effluent. 92. GOOD HOUSEKEEPING: Good housekeeping practices shall be observed at all times during the course of construction. Superintendence of construction shall be diligently performed by a person or persons authorized to do so at all times during working hours. The storing of goods and /or materials on the sidewalk acid /or the street will not be allowed unless a special permit is issued by the Engineering Division. The adjacent public right -of -way shall be kept clear of all job related dirt and debris at the end of the day. Dirt and debris shall not be washed into storm drainage facilities. The storing of goods and materials on the sidewalk and /or the street will not be allowed unless a special permit is issued. The developer's representative in charge shall be at the job site during all working hours. Fail-Lire to maintain the public right -of -way according to this condition may result in the Town performing the required maintenance at the developer's expense. 93. UTILITY SETBACKS: House foundations shall be set back from utility lines a sufficient distance to allow excavation of the utility without undermining the house foundation. The Page 20 of 25 Town Engineer shall determine the appropriate setback based on the depth of the utility, input from the project soils engineer, and the type of foundation. 94. NEIGHBORHOOD CONSTRUCTION COMMUNICATION PLAN: The applicant shall initiate a weekly neighborhood e -mail notification program to provide project status updates. The e-mail notices will also be posted on a bulletin board placed in a prominent location along the project perimeter. 95. PERMIT ISSUANCE: Permits for each phase; reclamation, landscape, and grading, shall be issued simultaneously. 96. COVERED TRUCKS: All trucks transporting materials to and from the site shall be covered. 97. FUTURE STUDIES: Any post project traffic or parking counts, or other studies imposed by Planning Commission or Town Council shall be funded by the applicant. TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE SANTA CLARA COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT: 98. FIRE APPARATUS (ENGINE) ACCESS ROADS REQUIRED: Provide access roadways with a paved all weather surface, a minimum unobstructed width of 20 feet, vertical clearance of 13 feet 6 inches, minimum circulating turning radius of 36 feet outside and 23 feet inside, and a maximum slope of 15 %. For installation guidelines refer to Fire Department Standards Details and Specifications sheet A-1. 99. FIRE LANE MARKING REQUIRED: Provide marking for all roadways within the project. Markings shall be per fire department specifications. Installations shall also conform to Local Government Standards and Fire Department Standard Details and SpecificationsA -6. 100. FIRE SPRINKLERS REQUIRED: Approved automatic sprinkler systems in new buildings and existing buildings and structures shall be provided in the locations described in this Section or in Sections 903.2.1 through 9032.18 whichever is the more restrictive. For the purposed of this Section, firewalls used to separate building areas shall be constructed in accordance with the California building Code and shall be without openings or penetrations. An automatic fire sprinkler system shall be provided throughout all new buildings and structures. Exception: Group A, B, E, F, I, L, M, S and U occupancy buildings and structures that do not exceed 1,000 square feet of building area and that are not located in the Wild land -Urban Interface Fire Area. Where provisions of this code require that a building or portion thereof be equipped throughout with an automatic sprinkler system in accordance Page 21 of 25 with this section, the sprinklers shall be installed throughout in accordance with NFPA 13 except as provided in Section 903.3.1.1.1 and local standards. For new buildings having no designated use or tenant, the minimum sprinkler design density shall be Ordinary Hazard Group 2, 912.2 Location. With respect to hydrants, driveways, buildings and landscaping, fire department connections shall be so located that fire apparatus and hose connected to supply the system will not obstruct access to the building for other fire apparatus. The location of fire department connections shall be approved by the fire code official. A State of California licensed (C -16) Fire Protection Contractor shall submit plans, calculations, a completed permit application and appropriate fees to the fire department for review and approval prior to beginning their work. 101. POTABLE WATER SUPPLIES; Potable water supplies shall be protected from contamination caused by fire protection water supplies. It is the responsibility of the applicant and any contractors and subcontractors to contact the water purveyor supplying the site of such project, and to comply with the requirements of that purveyor. Such requirements shall be incorporated into the design and any water -based fire protection systems, and /or fire suppression water supply systems or storage containers that may be physically connected in any manner to an appliance capable of causing contamination of the potable water supply of the purveyor of record. Final approval of the system(s) under consideration will not be granted by this office until compliance with the requirements of the water purveyor of record are documented by that purveyor as having been met by the applicant(s). 102. PRIVATE ON -SITE STANDPIPE REQUIRED: Provide one private on -site standpipe installed at a location to be detennined by the Fire Department, with a minimum acceptable flow of 1,000 GPM at 20 psi residual pressure. Prior to design, the project civil engineer shall meet with the fire department water supply officer to jointly spot the required fire hydrant locations. 103. EMERGENCY GATE /ACCESS GATE REQUIREMENTS: Gate installations shall conform with Fire Department Standards Details and Specification G -1 and, when opened shall not obstruct any portion of the required width for emergency access roadways or driveways. Locks, if provided, shall be fire department approved prior to installation. Gates across the emergency access roadways shall be equipped with an approved access device. If Page 22 of 25 the gates are operated electrically, an approved Knox key switch shall be installed; if they are operated manually, then approved Knox padlock shall be installed. Gates providing access from a road to a driveway or other roadway shall be at least 30 feet from the road being exited. 104. CONSTRUCTION SITE FIRE SAFETY: All construction sites must comply with applicable provisions of the CFC Chapter 14 and the Fire Department's Standards Detail and Specification SI -7. 105. PREMISES IDENTIFICATION: approved numbers or addresses shall be placed on all new and existing buildings in such a position as to be plainly visible and legible from the street or road fronting the property. Numbers shall contrast with their background. 106. ACCESS TO BUILDINGS /LANDSCAPING REQUIREMENTS: Landscaping shall not obstruct Fire Department ladder access to buildings. The building permit submittal shall include a landscape drawing which reflects the location of all landscaping, to include how Fire Department ladder access will be provided around all buildings. Ground - ladder rescue from second and third floor rooms shall be made possible for fire department operations. With the climbing angle of seventy five degrees maintained, an approximate walkway width along either side of the building shall be no less than seven feet clear. Landscaping shall not be allowed to interfere with the required access. An approved walkway shall be provided on all sides of the building(s) leading from the fire access roadway to the exterior openings of the building(s). 107. ROOF ACCESS: Provision shall be made to allow emergency responder access to all portions of the roof, as approved by the Fire Department. 108, EMERGENCY ACCESS KEY BOX REQUIRED: It is the Santa Clara County Fire Department's policy that a key box be required for buildings that are equipped with fire sprinklers and /or fire alarm systems. This policy will only help facilitate the quick response of emergency crews to the interior of a building. 109. TIMING OF REQUIRED WATER SUPPLY INSTALLATIONS: Installations of required fire service(s) and fire hydrant(s) shall be tested and accepted by the Fire Department, prior to the start of framing or delivery of bulk combustible materials. Building permit issuance may be withheld until required installations are completed, tested, and accepted. Page 23 of 25 110. TIMING OF REQUIRED ROADWAY INSTALLATIONS: Required access roads, up through first lift of asphalt, shall be installed and accepted by the Fire Department prior to the start of combustible construction. During construction, emergency access roads shall be maintained clear and unimpeded. Note that building permit issuance may be withheld until installations are completed. Temporary access roads may be approved on a case by case basis. 111. FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS IN PRIVATE SCHOOLS: An automatic fire alarm system shall be provided in new buildings of private schools. Exception: Automatic detection devices are not required where an approved automatic sprinkler system is installed in accordance with (CFC) Section 903.3.1.1 and the occupant notification appliances will activate on sprinkler water flow and manual activation is provided from a normally occupied location. *Required as a Mitigation Measure. Page 24 of 25 SECTION VI This Ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the Town Council of the Town of Los Gatos on , 2013, and adopted by the following vote as an ordinance of the Town of Los Gatos at a meeting of the Town Council of the Town of Los Gatos on 2013 and becomes effective 30 days after it is adopted. COUNCIL MEMBERS: AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: SIGNED: ATTEST: MAYOR OF THE TOWN OF LOS GATOS LOS GATOS, CALIFORNIA CLERK ADMINISTRATOR OF THE TOWN OF LOS GATOS LOS GATOS, CALIFORNIA Page 25 of 25 I ,is Page Intentionally Left Blank qV FQ- qJ w Q LU a w 0 ✓0 oo y 9R� l Q O� �4 i, Q' Q' J� U� Q E EXHIBIT A Of Exhibit 11 Ihds Page Intentionally Left Blank } 1 i 15t. jury's Church January 14, 2013 Ms. Jennifer Savage TOWN OF LOS GATOS RECEIVED Community Development Department / Planning Division WN 15 2013 110 E. Main Street Los Gatos, CA 95030 TOWN OF LOS GATOS PLANNING DIVISION RE: St. Mary's Church and School Application for PD Zoning /Lot Line Combination & Architectural Design Review 219 Bean Avenue & 59 Victory Lane Dear Ms. Savage: Attached is our application for the creation of a Planned Development (PD) Zoning District for our various Parish properties in downtown Los Gatos. We have also included supporting documentation for a Lot Line Combination at 59 Victory Lane, Architectural Design Review for anew 2 -story Jr. High School Building, and improvements to the existing 1 -story `Grammar School' Building. We also seek to update parking /staff /student quotas limited by our current Conditional Use Permit issued in 1985 to reflect our current operations. We thank Town staff for all of the help over the years providing positive guidance and feedback on our various developments and improvements. HISTORY St. Mary's was originally established in Los Gatos as a mission on Santa Cruz Avenue between Main Street and Bean Avenue. In 1912, the small hall used as the church was moved to the corner of Bean and Tait, and St. Mary's was established as a parish in its present location. Twc years later the first permanent rectory was built on parish property, and the current church was built in 1962. The school was opened in 1954 and has provided a solid academic education for thousands of students in our community. In 1985, a Conditional Use Permit was issued to St. Mary's Church and School when Lyndon Avenue was converted into a cul de sac, and St. Mary's built its Pastoral Center which includes a multi- purpose room, administrative center, and school and ministry offices. All of the conditions for the approval and guaranteed improvements were made as outlined in Resolution 1985 -47. (Note that this document references our `baseline' approvals: CUP U- 84 -17, A &SA S- 84 -60, and Subdivision Application M -84 -21 respectively). We have also used the 59 Victory Lane Building as our Library, Science Lab, 8th grade, Spanish & Art classes for many years as part of our overall school operations. During the past 26 years, the church and school have experienced leadership changes of executive staff (pastor and 219 Bean Avenue t1 Los Gatos, California 95030 0 408.3.54.3726 U fax 408.354.9302 EXHIBIT B Of Exhibit 11 principal), administrative staff, and volunteer leadership in the parish. Consequently, current management of the church and school were unaware of the existence of the Conditional Use Permit and its restrictions. Once the CUP was called to our attention, we proceeded to gather information to file the application for updating the CUP. PD ZONING/ DE, VELOPMENT AREA We seek to replace severely aging and outdated facilities to ensure we can deliver a quality education product in modern facilities. The construction of a two story classroom/library building at our eastern property line will allow us to use our current facilities during construction without the use of temporary trailers or rental facilities. Once completed, the demolition of 59 Victory Lane will then allow for replacement of parking/play area. Our existing early 1950's era `Grammar School' is also in need of major restoration and much needed expansion. We seek to create a more distinct Kindergarten area and provide plumbing facilities at each classroom. Complete renovation of the aged restroom facilities would provide compliance with disabled access requirements. The Parish also seeks to retain the option for demolition our existing `Teen Center'. The one - story building on the northeast corner of our campus is approximately 1,000 square feet. It is an aging building that we have used primarily for child care or teen activities for the past few years. In 2009, we received approval from the Town to replace it with a two -story single family home of approximately 3,000- square -feet to serve as the future rectory, the home of the priests who live on campus and serve our parish community. We have attached the future rectory plans for your reference only. Because these plans were completed prior to the design of the new Junior High School building, some modifications to the future rectory plans would be needed to coordinate with the new campus plan. We believe these changes and modifications could be done in the future. Currently the priests reside in a two -story building just east of the church that is also used for parish offices, meeting space and storage. At the existing rectory, 3,035 square feet are used for the priests' residences and 1,085 square feet are used for parish offices, meeting space, and storage. Following construction of the future rectory, the entire existing rectory will be converted to parish office and administrative use. The existing Administrative Building will continue to be used for both school and parish administrative uses. CUP 1VIODIN CATIONS We seek as part of the PD Zoning Process to modify our Conditional Use Permit that describes the level of activity at the church and school that has existed for many years: Condition 13 / Part 1: Student Enrollment in St. Mary's School St, Mary's School has been in operation since 1954, and its enrollment has fluctuated according to population trends and the desire of parents to provide their children with values -based education. Enrollment was at more than 400 in the 1960s when the large Baby Boom generation page 2 overflowed every classroom (private and public). At that time, as many as 50 students were assigned to each of St. Mary's classrooms. When the original Conditional Use Permit was issued in 1985, population trends had changed and there were many fewer students to be accommodated in elementary schools. The student population at that time was 265 students in grades 1 -8. Now, the population of school -age children has increased once again and St. Mary's School currently selves 296 students in grades 1 -8. In 1999, a local private preschool/kindergarten closed and St. Mary's School added a kindergarten class to help fill this educational void. [Public school classrooms in Los Gatos were also filled to overflowing.] St. Mary's added a 35- student kindergarten program in academic year 1999 -2000, bringing the total number of current students to 315. We request to update the maximum student enrollment to 315 children. There are no plans to increase student enrollment now or in the future as our facilities will not support them (9 Classrooms x 35 Students/Room = 315 Students) Condition 2 / Part 2; Number of Employees at St. Mary's Church & School The existing CUP states that 20 employees are expected to work at the site. It does not mention how many volunteers routinely worked at the church and school, but we know there were many. We have seen a significant change in the way work is accomplished in churches of all denominations, in all parts of the country. The amount of work has not necessarily increased, but churches are less reliant on volunteers and more dependent on paid staff. Consequently, the number of people working in the office is about the same, but their status has changed from volunteer to employee. When all programs are operating fully St. Mary's Church employs 8 full time staff and 5 part -time staff (equaling 2.1 FTE). St. Mary's School is a nine - months -a -year operation. It does not offer summer school. The school currently employees 15 full -time staff and 25 part-time staff (equaling 10.6 FTE), One FTE is equal to 40 hours per week. We request that the Conditional Use Permit for St. Mary's Church and School be updated to reflect the 35.7 FTE employees who work here. For parking purposes we will use 36. As demographics and the economy fluctuate, there may be the need in the future for St. Mary's to increase the number of employees as the number of volunteers decreases. Parking Related Information Currently there are a total of 105 parking spaces on the St. Mary's property. There are 72 marked spaces, 3 spaces in the garage, plus room for an additional 30 cars in unmarked spaces in the children's "play area" at the center of campus. In addition, the current 59 Victory Lane property has one on -site parking space and six off -site parking credits. We will continue to provide the one (1) on -site parking space as required for the Downtown Parking district. The existing CUP recognizes the 105 parking spaces as an approved, nonconforming situation, and allows nonconforming church uses to continue interminably. There has been no change to the number of seats in the church (654). We believe there is more than sufficient space to handle parking of employees for both the school and church on a daily operational basis. page 3 In years past, a discussion between a school representative and the Town traffic engineer, it was related by the traffic engineer that the change in the number of employees calculates to fewer than 20 trips and, as a result, does not require a traffic study. When school is not in session, such as during weekend masses or evening religious activities, the blacktop playground is used for parking, bringing the total on -site parking capacity to approximately 105. This parking is self - directed. Our required vehicular access to Victory Lane will be maintained in the proposed work. An ongoing communications program works to educate the parish community about parking options on the St. Mary's property and in adjacent public lots via flyers, bulletin, website (wwrv.stmary l_ org), meetings such as State of the School and asking school families to ride share. [See attached flyers, webpage and bulletin articles as examples.] Continuing efforts are made to remind parishioners and their guests to be sensitive to the needs and concerns of other residents of the St. Mary's neighborhood. HOURS OF OPERATION 7:30 a.m. to 9:30 p.m., seven days a week. On rare occasions, there will be a need to have a religious service during other hours. For example, after the September 111h tragedy, some people needed to find comfort with private prayer in the church. There was no formal mass, but the church was opened to the community during other hours. COMMUNITY USE OF FACILITIES In the past, the Town has requested that St. Mary's list the community groups (not affiliated with our religious activities) that use our facilities. These include: Almond Grove Neighborhood Watch meeting(s) Almond Grove Neighborhood Annual Block Party American Red Cross — six times per year, during the day (Blood Drive) Los Gatos Rotary Club — annual event (Crab Feed) Los Gatos Lions — annual event (Cioppino Feed) Handicapables — annual event ICF Polenta Dinner/Dance — twice per year YMCA — annual event (Father Daughter Dance) Country Fair — As you know, the parish also organizes our annual Country Fair one weekend in October, This is an event that is open to the public. The activities of St. Mary's church and school are community benefits. In fact, that is all that we do at St. Mary's — provide our parishioners and the community -at -large with religious programs and services that they desire. On average, the community uses the church and school facilities approximately 13 days per calendar year. As was stated in the original Conditional Use Permit issued by the Town, St. Mary's is "in harmony with the various elements and objectives of the General Plan and the Zoning page 4 Ordinance, because a church is allowed in any zone and this church was there before the Town was incorporated." ARCHITECTURE AND SITE APPLICATION: New Junior High School Building and Lower School Renovation With this application we are requesting Architecture and Site review for the new Junior High School building and for renovations to the existing Lower School building. The scope of work consists of the following: - Construction of a new, approximately 13,500 square foot classroom building on the existing campus of St. Mary's parish and school. The building consists of general education classrooms, a breakout room, a science lab, and art classroom, a library and related office spaces. The building is two stories above grade with a standard concrete spread footing foundation system and wood frame construction. The building is occupancy type E, construction type V -B. The building will be equipped throughout with an automatic fire sprinkler system and fire alarm. - Partial demolition of one classroom in the existing Lower School building to create a new walkway. No new square footage is added. - Demolition of existing one story building at 59 Victory Lane and lot line combination. - Construction of a new, approximately 3,000 square foot covered eating area. - Site utilities, pedestrian walkways and concrete flatwork to support new development. The site work includes a new masonry wall along the South and East property lines. The wall ranges in height from 6' -0" to 8' -0." The height is needed to maintain security and privacy near the school area of the parish campus. As you know, our kinder playground is adjacent to a public parking lot. The variation in height is due to the existing slope of the site, especially along Victory Lane. We are not requesting Architecture and Site review at this time for the proposed future church - related residential structure or for the addition to the existing Lower School building. SUMMARY We are not requesting an expansion of our property boundaries on increase in number seats in the church, but we do need to replace and update our aging school buildings with modern facilities. We also seek to update our CUP to reflect what currently exists: • Change the number of students in St. Mary's School from 265 to 315 • Change the number of employees for St. Mary's Church and School from 20 to 35.7 FTE employees who work there and reflect the current level of religious programs and activities underway at St. Mary's Church and School that benefit the entire community We believe there is sufficient on -site parking for the number of students and employees, according to the standard school parking formula used by the Town to handle our normal operations. page 5 As you can see we, have much to accomplish. If you may remember, we had a successful review and construction project for our After - School Care Room in 2009. We worked with the community and Town Staff to mitigate any concerns. The result has been a success for the Parish and Neighborhood. We look forward to meeting with you as soon as you have completed your 30 -day Review. Please let us know if there is additional background or detail needed for your review and we will work to provide as diligently as possible. Cordially, (�f (e Rev. Rick Rodoni Pastor, St. Mary's Parish & School Cc: Sr. Nicki Thomas, Principal, SMS Jeffrey T. Berg, AIA / Steinberg Architects Mr. Ian Abell, Diocese of San Jose Ms. Teri Tucci, SMP Attachment l: Additional Background: St. Mary's Parish statistics Attachment 2: Parking Flyer, Webpage, Bulletin Articles Attachment 3: Future Rectory Drawings page 6 Attachment 1: ADDITIONAL BACKGROUND We thought it might be helpful to provide some statistics on the growth of the St. Mary's community in the past 27 years. If you would prefer to see year -by -year statistics, please let us know. page 7 1985 1990 1995 2002 2006 2010 Number of 183 194 207 198 212 194 families with [# is for children at St. 1989, the Mary's School first year info available] Number of students at St. Mary's School 236 262 280 280 280 290 in grades 1 -8 Number of Kindergart Kindergart Kindergart 35 students at St. en classes en classes en classes (60% are 35 35 Mary's School in not offered not not siblings) Kindergarten until 1999 offered offered until 1999 until 1999 Number of families 1450 1532 1648 2290 2496 2082 registered as members of St. Mary's Church Average 1581 1351 1614 1752 1445 1373 attendance by per per per per individuals at weekend weekend weekend weekend weekend masses Number of 5 5 5 5 5 5 weekend masses Number of 65 62 65 34 16 15 page 7 weddings at St. Mary's :F- Number of 44 41 38 35 40 19 filnerals [# is for at St. Mary's 1986, the first year info is available] Number of baptisms 93 127 168 191 71 131 at St. Mary's page 8 KI"n,cJ to Our Nei 66a rs Please remember to use the designated. parLingareas (noted below)wkile atSt_ Mar 's, ParLing is also - available alone Bean Avenue (on the St. Mar L's side ) . � Than L you. Aciclitlonal' downtown Parking areas are notccl'cnL the revere side. IVIAR j FAIR 31-0 r- t As we Imow, parking is an issue in our -neighbor- hood. In an effort to alleviate this problem here are some things you can do \�. ar p ool whenever possible 1wa -ys attempt to use the townys public parking lots first (see snap on back) I RP emeiaaber, you can have someone drop you off and pa.ch. you up LF-1- njoy a walk, ride -your bike(s), rollerblade, rain., etc. to the CountrT Fair ST. MARY'S CHURCH Mass Intentions for the Week Monday, Aug. 21 7:30am Ruth Borre + Tuesday, Aug. 22 7:30am Dr. Ed Marcuz + Wednesday, Aug. 23 7:30am Harold Johnson + Thursday, Aug. 24 7:30am Denes Kassai + Friday, Aug. 25 7:30am Ann Longo + Saturday, Aug. 26 7:30am Francis Hayes + 5:00pm Ted Hettel + Sunday, Aug. 27 7:30 am Arline Petersen + 9:00 am Fred Callis + 11 :15 am Kathryn Blanchard + 6:00 pm Parishioners Please place this week's Scripture Readings (Aug. 13th) in this box. Thanks! Be kind to our neighbors In our bulletin on July 31st we inserted a flyer suggesting available parking areas when coming to St. Mary's for mass or any other event here. If you missed the flyer you can find the information on our website: www.churchre2istrv.com/smlp-. If you have any questions or concerns about parking, please contact Teri Tucci at 354 -3726 ext. 37. REPORT ON COLLECTIONS FOR 8/13/2000 Actual: $14,920.53 YID: $71,684.53 Goal: $16,176.50 YID: $69,373.14 Variance: $ 1,255.97 YTD: $ 21311.39 LOS OATOS , REMINDER AUGUST 15 is the feast of the Assumption of the Blessed Virgin Mary. It is a fact that some of the Holy Days have been moved to the next Sunday or are not celebrated. However, the Assumption is still considered as a Holy Day of Obligation. Mass will be celebrated at 7 :30 a.m. and 7:30 p.m. ATTENTION LECTORS & EUCHARISTIC MINISTERS: We will begin processing the schedule for Oct. -Dec. the last week of August. Contact us at (408) 354 -4061 ext. 35 with any necessary "change of status" for inclusion in this schedule. Please check the vestibule of the-church X or retreat informationfrom the various retreat centers located within our diocese. REGISTRATION INFORMATION If you have recently started attending our parish or have been attending but have never registered, please come by the parish office OR pick up a registration form in the Vestibule. Registering in the parish benefits all of us. We begin to know who you are and you receive general parish mailings and Sunday envelopes. Without specific use of envelopes, it is impossible for us to keep track of any donations you make to the Church. Don't procrastinate. Register today! ATTENTION THE ABATEMENT PROCESS HAS BEGUN IN THE BELL TOWER AND REAR CONFESSIONAL. WE WILL BE CONTINUING WITH THIS PROCESS BEGINNING THIS WEEK. THANK YOU FOR YOUR PATIENCE AS THE CHURCH UNDERGOES THIS CONSTRUCTION PROJECT. ST. MARY'S CHURCH Mass Intentions for the Week Monday, October 2 7:30am Linnet Loiscau + Tuesday, October 3 7:30am Eduardo San Juan + Wednesday, October 4 7:30am Marge Goldstrom & Margaret Bernardo ,. ,.. 9:00 am Anna Michalski Thursday, October 5 7:30am Antonio Alvernaz + Friday, October 6 Alice Winter & hIelen Marcotte + Saturday, October 7 7:30am Carmelites + 5:00pm Daoud S. Dinno + Sunday, October 8 7:30 am Dr. William Chaikin + 9:00 am Parishioners 11:15 am George Bernardo, .�,. r. 6:00 pm Conti Luigia + Be kind to our neighbors ... Please make every effort to park in our parking lots and public parking lot #6 before parking in front of our neighbors' homes. To find out more about where you can park, you can find the information on our website: www.churcbrggista-com/s . If you have any questions or concerns about parking, please contact Teri Tucci at 3541 -3726 ext. 37. SERRA CLUB OF SAN JOSE Almighty God, your son Jesus told us to pray for vocations since the harvest is great and the laborers are few. Help all of us who center our Catholic lives in word and sacrament to be active promoters of vocations to the priesthood and religious life. The ministry of identifying any nurturing vocations belongs to each member of each family in our parish family. May we all accept this mission from Jesus with the determination that comes from faith. REPORT ON COLLECTIONS FOR 9 /17/2000 Ach.tal: $16,398.50 YTD: $175,965.46 Goal: $16,176.50 YTD: $194,118.50 Variance: $222.00 YTD: ($15,153.04) LOS GATOS SPIRITUALLY ENHANCING OPPORTUNITIES Beyond Sunday The most recent 'Beyond Sunday" newsletter was mailed to all registered parishioners last week. Additional copies of this newsletter can be found at exits of church and in parish offices. Please consider what activities you can participate in and send in the 'registration form' enclosed in the newsletter. All events are open to parishioners and their family and friends. All registrants will be planed on the 'attendees list' for the events with contact only if a particular session /series is 'full'. Check date and location for event, show up, and you will be expected! If you have questions call 354- 406105. Small Christian Communities Several small faith sharing groups are willing and able to accept new members. Still considering being a part of a group? We'll find the group that meets your scheduling needs -- -cal' 354 - 406105. Diocese of San Jose Jubilee Celebration Don't forget to check out the information 'newspaper' at exits of the church on this special catechetical and liturgical event for all Catholics of the diocese on Oct. 28. Registration forms found in the newspaper -type brochure are to be sent directly to diocesan address listed. You will find a variety of topics and may chose the sessions you are most interested in attending. DATES & PLACES 1'0 REMEMBER: September 28, 9:30atn, Hofinann Center, "Women of Scripture" series began; October 18, 7 :30pn:, Hofmann Center, "Forgiveness" series begins. Take Another Look Returning to active participation in the community? We offer all adult Catholics an opportunity to renew their understanding of the beliefs and practices of the Church today. You name the topics of interest, we provide the information. Call 354 -4061 ext. 35 and a T.A.L. team member will contact / you. ST. MARY'S CHURCH Mass Intentions for the Week 9:00 am ,Monday, November 27 7 :30am Linda Zuechelli + Tuesday, November 28 7:30am Peggy Best. Speeiai lniefinn Wednesday, November 29 7:30am Peg Kennedy+ Thursday, November 30 7:30am Helen Marcotte + Friday, December 1 7:30am Louise lorillo, spedpiinrrman Saturday, December 2 7:30am Carmelites 5:00pm Antonio Alvernaz + Sunday, December 3 $16,405.00 7:30 am Eduardo San Juan + 9:00 am Fred Callis + 11 :15 am Beverly Antes + 6:00 pm Paul Macierz + ` Parishioners PARKING NOTICE New Time Restrictions and Sunday Enforcement a ® ® ®Now In Effect® e a As part of the Town of Los Gatos Holiday" Parking program, new timed parking restrictions are in effect throughout the downtown area. Please carefully read the parking restrictions on the signs posted near the space each time you park your vehicle to avoid receiving a parking citation. For detailed information about the program and the various parking options available, you can pick up a copy of the 2000 Holiday Parking in Historic Downtown Los Gatos brochure from any merchant, Chamber of Commerce, Town Hall, at Lot 4 from the Valet Parking attendants, or from the driver of the free shuttle bus. SERRA CLUB OF SAN JOSE Parents, Encourage Your Children: To develop their talents and gifts, encourage them to think of Church ministry as a possible and viable life choice. REPORT ON COLLECTIONS FOR 11/19/2000 Actual: $16,405.00 YTD: $315,358.99 Goal: $16,176.50 YTD: $323;530.00 Variance: x-228.50 YTD: (7,171.01) LOS GATOS Schedule for Friday, December 8, 2000 Feast of the Immaculate Conception of Mary The church will be open from 6:30a.m. until 9:00p.11z. on this day 7:30 am Mass 9:00 am Mass followed by a reception in Hofmann Center 11 :30 am Exposition of the Blessed Sacrament 12:00 pm Mid -day prayer and benediction 3:30 -4:30 pm -- Confession 7:30 pm Mass txacriers vineyard Retreat - December 8 -10, 2000 Struggling with feelings of sadness or loss after abortion? Still seeking peace months or years after the choice? You are not alone. join us December 8 -10 in the Russian River Wine Country for a healing weekend retreat. Safe, supportive setting includes sharing, ritual, prayer, sacraments, and memorial service. Facilitated by a team of licensed therapists and others who have walked the journey from pain to healing. Cost is $125 (no one will be denied for financial reasons). Registration required by November 27. Call Family Life Office, Diocese of Oakland (925) 680 -8510. Ask for Monika or call ext. 4 or obtain an information packet. All inquiries confidential See also www.rachelsvinevard.org. On Saturday, December 2nd, we will be decorating the church for the masses of the Advent Season. If you have an hour or two to spare anytime ®� between 8:30 a.m. and 12:00 noon that day, we would welcome your presence and any assistance you can offer. We will be hanging the Advent wreath and preparing a beautiful worship environment for our parish. We would be pleased to see you and 00 gratEfid for any time that you could ® spend with us. If you can join us, please call Marianne McGrath at 365 -3706, We wish you a blessed and holy Advent. 0IN O TN 3 1 R>, V, ry� �-- - -- 15 LA l e d w rryry le d ;J c rJ, n• rD �ryryyy f co Y Ln 0 4 � ro / U ry� �-- - -- 15 LA l e d w rryry le d ;J c ¢7 c P r) Ul O p to X �i rJ, n• �ryryyy f co Y 4 � ro ¢7 c P r) Ul O p to X �i I198 unn {,•.,, 11 Ln.s (:nnss, [nli /nrnin 95030 40.354.3736 Online Giving Centennial Campaign Mass Times Contact Us 'h - A4Tryl od tl , fi, i�»r� cccTL �cc� C'ancgp -, rr j t r � .r J � ent�lfralt.:C+(.ttuc,(u (7((YaslCaGfotttor95u3(F� o-4 sl' -�3a. Eh \.,.•f.,..'� .�,.`1 e, ., .�Yaa' e:,•�r,✓fl,s. ..b I I I Home ( About Us Sacraments & Worship i Faith Formation I Faith in Action I Get Involved St. Mary's School I Resources i Search Site Directions and Parking Search About Us / Directions and Parking Share 1 Imormaiion (uownioad parking map to be printed) Whera to park at St. Mary's and surrounding duwnrown padcOYa avallahl(r In Los Gatos r _ _ •IY•, It�____ r, .. r7C Pm.irn l�11 a :4iaP area cf a1 F Zz, Jr t �i`l�j //'s/it�/`�� ter9 f l j St. Iblary of the Immaculate Conception - 219 Bean Avenue, Los Gatos, CA 408.354 3726 St. Mary School - 30 Lyndon, Los Gatos, CA 408 -354 3944 Contact Us / Search Site I Site Map I Login powered by eCatholic a division of WEBPRO PRODUCTIONS, LLC S,�r U ryH fjaftfntAa y'4(y e Park dlo' cr�Chi r,C:u vi Wtr:, Pa st 11v CWOi2 Google Map data @ 12013 Google- View Larger Map 1 Imormaiion (uownioad parking map to be printed) Whera to park at St. Mary's and surrounding duwnrown padcOYa avallahl(r In Los Gatos r _ _ •IY•, It�____ r, .. r7C Pm.irn l�11 a :4iaP area cf a1 F Zz, Jr t �i`l�j //'s/it�/`�� ter9 f l j St. Iblary of the Immaculate Conception - 219 Bean Avenue, Los Gatos, CA 408.354 3726 St. Mary School - 30 Lyndon, Los Gatos, CA 408 -354 3944 Contact Us / Search Site I Site Map I Login powered by eCatholic a division of WEBPRO PRODUCTIONS, LLC ?X, " L-Mlz Am.MYL�Ylh it I�NO I 30�1=11� K� jZ a ?,--; —7 i5c J 74 1 - ----- CE FF V1 fj .......... Iii. ,� u u h t ilia L Iii. ,� < Bql 11 T-i -2 \� U Iss It it is o u < Bql 11 T-i -2 \� U Iss It it is o . . . . . . ...... map Al N .- 0 1- 0 - N a-�X,5- -1, - J- 1, U-O� rI H IT . AF E. o ihm . - 1, 1 lam. W111 11 'PP IrrI fld lit 4i ci j IT . AF W111 11 IrrI lit 4i IT W111 11 IrrI ci IT A1 IN 0 -10 N 16215 j1 -1 4 oil ' ""' C� 1 4417 M 1 i 1"y 'M 1,; 1 1, V V.Ili 0 �771 > ........... 7 1 11 li-I'diii UN— art v i - •�r 1. 4 oil ' ""' C� 1 4417 M 1 i 1"y 'M 1,; 1 1, V V.Ili 0 �771 > ........... 7 1 11 li-I'diii rll T_ ot l J elf 1"y 'M 1,; 1 1, V V.Ili 0 �771 > ........... 7 1 11 T_ ot l J elf IU pit sidik ,I` bis ', tag tl No R— 0 ,< 1"y 'M 1,; 1 1, 0 �771 lilt, ........... 7 1 11 li-I'diii 1. IL &Z IU pit sidik ,I` bis ', tag tl No R— 0 ,< In 0 �771 li-I'diii In - P. I 1 I a� F a= u i UL I I i Mall mo I INN RMEN im N Y L Q rT ° lid sa �9j pp6'g (n 9aas CisS ■ -:i 1 � i Q U 0 l V o U) Q J EXHIBIT C Of Exhibit 11 O U > a iW9 3Q $$ e2 §§ � 9 N on O Ni O O Y F w W td va LO C'j ZE EXHIBIT C Of Exhibit 11 > N 8Z �O 9 60 0:� Q O 9 a Y F w W LO C'j ZE YEY €22 g4 g6 GIS iEEii 2 $� gaCd =3d $g U` g {MMMS ih EE�E Ev cvEE � a8R`pp 99 gg e3ppyyMvJd,A3 � Y$1� °ss�gyy ¢d8 g�g ey�'gig3 pp��j�8� {dgf3 Wil b1shol' � E�cA9 �78 3H v qgg�d9 16118^ -'.` h gg� $k� 93A5� I 1A lob 58 F 6 / / W r,�a A 0\r ° 17 � q b ,® "a a a. Hq ��ss++ y 3g Y tltl S "wny EXHIBIT C Of Exhibit 11 .... . . . . . . . . Ip. ........... CNJ @ o HIM m § • ) \ § � § .. ! § • ` Z ` "~ / \1 | | \ YQU 19 tD ! /§ {£ !- | . $ ~'®.a k | - ƒ ¢ |Q %§\ • | \ \ m \. ,a ` "~ / \1 | | k | ■ | ;�, \(Ell Id'. U) A r-I ME x cyi < v OUR 0 1 P 1 Li /\k/ ( / -n MID ® x ! : \ (P I w MA-1 if VF z 0 =14 1 �,vkuq( I ' 1 '; 0 Tug CL 4J Q 3: 'A coca(H) 10 Jl ll�V 7 z 0 Zii It 5 g 3: 'A coca(H) 10 Jl ll�V 7 A 3H all All- � NIB- /\� \ \ v U Q F' E, $g lip ppia All N Saa9 9$ad 3?d ajj. O 31:55: \aoc.e j oeus,Aa �8 I ^., r % "` %'1....y I �rr �',- � -"xF: �n. • --•-Ia _. -i ::— -_ .� _ -_ -_.ri r _. - .r,,.:'• er..axn � A Z pg ge .�I )r I As I� a l 'a ' �..- ,.y. 5 4 � � y, 39 J 5 )'• /Kr 0.,I /• { A C� Xo as Ci Fj tt NNyy 8�a € ®4p uia zm a� Fa ajj. O 31:55: � -- — - -- '`' x : ?° i 1 /r /) ' -_- :- "._:_ill �• +; ° �� � ��g�8���a� �i A i� gtH �- z , : ,9-n, - - � -� �. II; / •�- 4111 � � � 3 � �����aS��B�r ��>� �� � If <v^: -- -�•.• -Ih a �a�ia�3f���p���g�$ #�$���$ i�g� t B 1 m_.,. j_ ... yf .r[, 3 i jig a -B$ $ Jill d = e: C� e2yy]] �� -$- 'r�i is "..v'.IC'' .87r/j dxl`.•:,_ n H�'�'i - .'3•y, i'� „> x,,.40.,,,.$ ellSE HS$ M FJ M \aoc.e j oeus,Aa �8 I ^., r % "` %'1....y I �rr �',- � -"xF: �n. • --•-Ia _. -i ::— -_ .� _ -_ -_.ri r _. - .r,,.:'• er..axn � A Z pg I- .�I )r I I� I �..- ,.y. 5 4 � � y, 39 II s 1.wr...o )'• /Kr 0.,I /• €e � yaA � -- — - -- '`' x : ?° i 1 /r /) ' -_- :- "._:_ill �• +; ° �� � ��g�8���a� �i A i� gtH �- z , : ,9-n, - - � -� �. II; / •�- 4111 � � � 3 � �����aS��B�r ��>� �� � If <v^: -- -�•.• -Ih a �a�ia�3f���p���g�$ #�$���$ i�g� t B 1 m_.,. j_ ... yf .r[, 3 i jig a -B$ $ Jill d = e: C� e2yy]] �� -$- 'r�i is "..v'.IC'' .87r/j dxl`.•:,_ n H�'�'i - .'3•y, i'� „> x,,.40.,,,.$ ellSE HS$ M FJ M ..\wax oN`- -' p III � I `�• _ll -..!l �- - L 114, i 5 d IT �j 3� sf U Z I ^., r % "` %'1....y I �rr �',- � -"xF: �n. • --•-Ia _. -i ::— -_ .� _ -_ -_.ri r _. - .r,,.:'• er..axn � A Z pg I- .�I )r I/ ".v I I Nain,., ;, �j. •...p t,:t Y ��r �..- ,.y. 5 4 � � y, 39 II s 1.wr...o )'• dfi g 9 i ICI a I )• ,ti I. _ 'y �nW,IM x(xAtYJSxiWOV vwrnaara:ssnonxusna 3 a �H� ,1 '� ..\wax oN`- -' p III � I `�• _ll -..!l �- - L 114, i 5 d IT �j 3� sf U Z Ii i I...... ... t ilh T1 0 0 fg Rog lug. MIT, �?���y ��`��5 9' 4�' f ''))\.� a..- ,.. -.��. ` "'"'mom i:w""_ 3 $G >a� ga4� °� ���o)S NMI wwww 0 Hil WE ®r, . . . . . . . . . . Roll 11 in q co i ygz ... . ... ...... 11 in q co i ygz v XV99 ---------- 'tl II tl I 'tl .| ._ o", J | \ /C� MHO& ) ^ �`f . A �§ ƒ Ell m �� B 3 |d ƒ 9 .| ._ o", J | \ /C� MHO& ^ �`f \A; \ |•! » d h so! ] p Efl .| ._ o", R {o ) !� �} J � �gw jl� (2 � J | \ /C� MHO& \A; \ R {o ) !� �} J � �gw jl� (2 � No Jim m fibi aa Wfl, Id 1h Qj al 111. INIA Jim m fibi - — - — - — ----- SnNHAV MvF[a ,I `� la ;I �I �I �I 1 4J - — - — - — ----- SnNHAV MvF[a ,I `� la ;I �I �I �I 1 of §1 4------------- - - - - -- ------------------------------------------ so MEN LINE No j AIR A WON "I *.'—ft 11 O LO C) LL °° cc I r4 cli Ni xv!;g ffl�q gin HII-H a o0 IQQ 4i < 3:19 91 §1 4------------- - - - - -- ------------------------------------------ so MEN LINE No j AIR A WON "I *.'—ft 11 O LO C) LL °° cc I r4 cli Ni r. oil, I NM: ��- ° AINs' °'°' tTl L ji- p. F"q Nu WENT p ir 4- Dill MV ..... ..... MIA 1.1 A' \ /�� �\ I XNA v 7� � � - _ / ® \ / \\ \ /�� �\ I U 9 v 30 NSA rn V I C 1 C R Y L A N E 1, ^/ � H I iI i 1 I I I I 1 ......._._.._ �..... 1� I I a k I I I I I I II I it i 1 I c= I I it I I I I I � qqgg I u f I g I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I e I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I i I i iI I I o I I I I I g � I I I 0 I I I I I i ° Hog CL C C Y 3g N 4-J o- rn V I C 1 C R Y L A N E 1, ^/ � H I iI i 1 I I I I 1 ......._._.._ �..... 1� I I a k I I I I I I II I it i 1 I c= I I it I I I I I � qqgg I u f I g I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I e I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I i I i iI I I o I I I I I g � I I I 0 I I I I I i -0-81 -NE N ON I 1-i 0 0 111 LO 41 1 w < ff,: 1H 9 -0-81 -NE N ON I 1-i 0 0 111 a ; §@ !§ § ƒ) |. - - , § � | | ■ | § §| � $ \| § _ \f 7ƒ .,r.k _ � k � M| «! � � � C � j M , I � � � o / R| �•x.\ ) \ 2/ \ 4D. � §' ; , jk ( ) % HUSH © # mca:A \ ° k ) � � � C � j M , I � � � o / ) \ ) ) � # ) \ / ( ! « ) � � � � � C � j M , I � N � s \ � � ) � # N us Ulm.3 ...... . ... . . lop Ills 9 tL I 1 11 In Z m 0 En x 05 HN -. 90 LOP g I tz 4", z 11180.fflm ...... . ... . . lop Ills 9 tL I 1 11 In N _ N X228 `0= R o E g- al 0 R s i in¢ zm' �9 a "�Es gib >�� �gy g if Millmla NUN �Nl 1�wj� Jun M1 " z N. ffi �W` 0 V w 3IS) -1 Q Q~ �U V— L ?u �IL Lo t9fl ....._.-. -A 89 1) 's ±1 , m �� I iitl9x�il I c• i II 37t i w w �1i4 u J }'g{ j 71131 � Z �1Q I u. w as O N F- !.1 ~ 0 a �d till A k� W Bi f7 99111 g �. tI as # sls�l� 1! �- (3 L J� 0 V w 3IS) -1 Q Q~ �U V— L ?u �IL Lo qqy r a y p z C c e 0 _ e9�, \`• 0 'a--8a �?a 101 ONIHNVd lVIA AHWSVH SO1V0 SO1 d0 NMO1 ¢ P H`JIH ,9 -,9 (N) — z mW� � - — g3 ............................ a I w9z -- - ------------- i N _________________ _________ _____ _________ ___ _ _J . . -- - TJ w p a9 __________________________�...� _ ._ - ....III .. _...� ........._... I W - 2 SU Z - J OJ C9 3 `fin U _N C7 O U z °wy z� ------------- '3 AV N V 3 8 31Y9 9NV 33ND (N) roaarov,xVl nr. •�✓nW4M+•N^r n4ry ew•Y<vmxuNf�u sxMm,•xnnrrn+, u••e n,,,,, rx.0 /// awns rvuriw,. +�nw wa•ni ,y. x•.•vrw+.w. v�sx s•i., su +nn nin.n, wxr wv, ux.rw.n., wx iy..,�ux +W• /n. +v.w r w,anx.mrax wr,+ewv sp vs < EP a) wa r a - - -.` - IVA", 9 EE a 50 ^ ^{ '� ~\ w\ wa r a - - -.` - IVA", / a Ai ^ ^{ '� ~\ w\ �� \{ � ^,`ƒ n n ------------- LL jA H h 9 Zp ti - - .- .... __._ - ----_------- I J 9 4J a in I INA H n n ------------- LL jA H h 9 Zp ti - - .- .... __._ - ----_------- I ) � _ A � J| � |, j) [ $ |■ . §'e \{ k )| )� \| %§ � Lo / � k� I L}\ Z = ° PER, k \ £ 2 ! \| § { - ƒ \ f / £� §! « Lo 22 \-9 a ,# !; w q 2q, \ E ( k ) f| e! * % El : ! \ .j � \ � \� 8 M U in �sa9 iaQa ���� IQ 0 r'> O .,.,.. ffiff8�� e QM- -qnNahr Nq �1Ccz t r— N kglg�p 5 °N lu ry a F oil HH. 27 all o lip w w. �S N — 4 3 a ....... - - -- la a o "Ho � 9 011 g1 i y lag This Page Intentionally Left Blank