3W N OF
I
1ps�SA`04 TOWN COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
DATE: FEBRUARY 19, 2013
MEETING DATE: 2/19/2013
ITEM NO: -3
TO: MAYOR AND TOWN COUNCIL
FROM: GREG LARSON, TOWN MANAGER
SUBJECT: FY 2012/13 MID -YEAR BUDGET PERFORMANCE AND STATUS REPORT -
SIX MONTHS ENDING DECEMBER 31, 2012
A. ACCEPT FY 2012/13 MID -YEAR BUDGET PERFORMANCE AND
STATUS REPORT, INCLUDING FY 2012/13 FINANCIAL
PROJECTIONS
B. AUTHORIZE BUDGET ADJUSTMENTS AS RECOMMENDED IN
THE ATTACHED SECOND QUARTER BUDGET PERFORMANCE
REPORT
C. PROVIDE DIRECTION ON 2012 -14 STRATEGIC GOALS AND 2013
WORKPLAN
RECOMMENDATION:
1. Accept the FY 2012/13 Mid -Year Budget Performance and Status Report, including FY
2012/13 financial projections.
2. Authorize budget adjustments as recommended in the attached Second Quarter Budget
Performance Report (Attachment 1).
3. Provide direction on 2012 -2014 Strategic Goals and 2013 Workplan.
PURPOSE:
The purpose of this report is to provide the Town Council with a status of the FY 2012/13
Adopted Operating Budget at the mid -year point, including an overview of revenue and
expenditure trends and financial projections for the current fiscal year. This report also includes
a brief discussion of the Town's current year General Fund Reserve status and an update to the
Town's five -year financial projections (FY 2013 -2018) to provide a context for the FY 2013/14
budget development process and recommended budget approach. In addition, the report
discusses the 2012 -2014 strategic goals and the workplan for 2013.
PREPARED BY: Stephen D. Conway, Administrative Services and Finance Director
NAFINANCEIQtrly Financial Reports\FY2013\2nd Quarter \2013_ Mid _Year _Budget _Staff Report.doc
Reviewed by:)LAssistant Town Manager Town Attorney OF
PAGE
MAYOR AND TOWN COUNCIL/MEMBERS OF THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY
SUBJECT: FY 2012/13 MID -YEAR BUDGET PERFORMANCE AND STATUS REPORT -
SIX MONTHS ENDING DECEMBER 31, 2012
February 19, 2013
DISCUSSION:
FY 2011/12 MID -YEAR BUDGET STATUS
Budget Performance Report
The attached Budget Performance Report (Attachment I) is a mid -year report covering a six -
month period beginning July 1, 2012 and'ending December 31, 2012 The report provides
analysis and recommendations related to the current year's adopted budget revenue and
expenditures and the projected financial condition of all Town funds.
General Fund Projected Year -End Balances June 30, 2013
Current fiscal year -end projections for FY 2012/13 reflect an anticipated $900,000 surplus of
operating revenues over expenditures. This has been achieved as a result of conservative
budgeting of expenditures as well as the net revenue additions discussed in Attachment 1. In
addition, revenue collections for licenses and permits resulting from increased activity in our
building and planning departments have helped to bring in increased revenues for the Town but
also some increased expenditures linked to these revenues. Staff would note that the $900,000 in
projected year -end surplus does not include the previously budgeted use of $500,000 in reserves
which no longer appears necessary and may be available to help in balancing next year's budget.
FY 2012/13 MID -YEAR BUDGET UPDATE TRENDS
Operating Revenue Trends
The FY 2012/13 mid -year update reflects that while some of the economically sensitive revenues
are trending ahead of forecasts and indicate an improved economic outlook, other areas, such as
Sales & Use tax, General Property Tax, Transient Occupancy Tax and Interest are still trending
behind expectations. Key areas such as Charges for Service and Licenses and Permits are
trending higher than anticipated which has resulted in staff recommending the net revenue
increase.
The Town's revenue forecast is dependent upon the stability of economically sensitive revenues,
including sales tax, property tax, transient occupancy tax, franchise fees, and interest income.
Given Netflix's business model change, the volatile nature of sales tax is evident, underscoring
the importance of diversifying the Town's economic portfolio.
Operating Expenditure Trends
Anticipating that some of the Town's economically sensitive revenues would continue to be
impacted by the economy, staff continued to implement cost reduction strategies this fiscal year,
including targeted hiring freezes, unpaid furlough days, redeployment of staff, and reduction in
materials and supply costs. Many of these reduction strategies have helped to keep current
departmental expenditures below the expected 50% of budget level, which could result in
expenditure savings at year -end.
PAGE
MAYOR AND TOWN COUNCIL/MEMBERS OF THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY
SUBJECT: FY 2012/13 MID -YEAR BUDGET PERFORMANCE AND STATUS REPORT -
SIX MONTHS ENDING DECEMBER 31, 2012
February 19, 2013
Organizational Changes
Rapidly rising revenues and workloads in Community Development and Engineering are
requiring staffing adjustments and accommodations. Specifically, the administration will be
continuing the shared management structure for Parks & Public Works and Community
Development, reallocating the salary savings resulting from Wendie Rooney's recent retirement
to meet immediate policy and advance planning workloads in Community Development. In
addition, the Town has and will engage new, temporary and'consulting staff in both Current
Planning and Engineering to meet project specific workloads to be funded by the increased
revenues resulting from those workloads. The temporary increased code enforcement staffing
has been implemented to meet both Council and community requests as well as freeing up staff
time for rising building inspection workloads. Last, staff is now proceeding to fill the former
Parks & Facilities Superintendent position (previously held by Christy Wolter) as a lower
Supervisor position so that some salary savings can also be reallocated for Engineering and
Inspections workload demands. A complete revised staffing structure for Community
Development and Parks & Public Works will be presented as part of the proposed budget for
next year.
State Budget Impacts to Local Governments
On June 28, 2011, the Governor signed ABxl 26 and ABxl 27 into law. ABxl 26 (the
"Dissolution Act ") proposed to eliminate redevelopment agencies as of October 1, 2011, and
essentially restricted redevelopment agencies from entering into new agreements, borrowing or
lending funds, or acquiring or disposing of real property prior to dissolution. ABxl 27 (the
"Voluntary Program Act ") would have allowed redevelopment agencies to remain in existence
and be exempt from ABxl 26 if certain "voluntary" payments were made to the State in FY 2012
and in each fiscal year thereafter. This legislation was later challenged and considered by the
California Supreme Court. On December 29, 2011, the California Supreme Court issued its
decision in the California Redevelopment Association v. Matosantos case, finding the ABxl 26
Dissolution Act constitutional and the ABxl 27 ( "Alternative Redevelopment Program Act ")
unconstitutional.
Effective February 1, 2012, all California redevelopment agencies ( "RDAs ") were dissolved and
their assets and functions have been transferred to successor agencies and housing functions
successors, to "wind- down" the activities of the former RDAs. The Town elected and has been
designated to serve as the "Successor Agency" to the former Los Gatos Redevelopment Agency.
The Town has also elected to retain and accept specified affordable housing assets, obligations,
and housing functions of the former Redevelopment Agency and will serve as the "Housing
Functions Successor."
While the implementation associated with the legislation is evolving, staff and legal counsel
continue to work closely with the California Redevelopment Association (CRA), League of
California Cities, California Society of Municipal Finance Officers (CSMFO), and other legal
entities to understand and monitor the current and future impacts of the dissolution of the Town's
PAGE 4
MAYOR AND TOWN COUNCIL/MEMBERS OF THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY
SUBJECT: FY 2012/13 MID -YEAR BUDGET PERFORMANCE AND STATUS REPORT -
SIX MONTHS ENDING DECEMBER 31, 2012
February 19, 2013
Redevelopment Agency. At this time Successor Agency monies are being held in a Private
Purpose Trust Fund and are no longer shown on the Town's Financial Statements.
GENERAL FUND RESERVE STATUS
As of June 30, 2012, Town's FY 2011/12 General Fund balance was approximately $23.5
million, all of which is legally reserved or designated for special purposes by Council. Included
in this amount are approximately $4.2 million in reserves for Catastrophic reserves, $7.0 million
for Capital and Special Projects, and $6.7 million for Budget Stabilization and $2.3 million in
unallocated reserves. These reserves remain intact at the mid -year point of FY 2012/13.
FY 2013/14 BUDGET DEVELOPMENT PROCESS
Concurrent with the update of the Five -Year Financial Plan and in anticipation that service
reductions would be necessary for the FY 2013/14 budget, staff began informal budget
development discussions in January 2013. This process includes the conceptual development of
staffing changes, revenue enhancements, and adjustments to the User Fee Schedule. Staff is
currently working on preparing the FY 2013/14 budget which will be presented to council in
May 2013. Staff is continuing to use the budget proposals prioritization matrix adopted by
Council last year.
FIVE -YEAR FINANCIAL PLAN UPDATE
The Five -Year Financial Plan is an independent financial tool used to forecast current and future
revenues and expenses. This tool is designed to be more fluid in nature to build various funding
scenarios and test "what if' assumptions, providing a range of budget strategies for
consideration.
The updated Plan for the current year projects a surplus of $900,000, however also forecasts
deficits in FY 2013/14 and FY 2014/15. Current and future projections in the Five -Year Plan are
based upon conservative revenue and expenditure growth rates and trends.
PAGE 5
MAYOR AND TOWN COUNCIL/MEMBERS OF THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY
SUBJECT: FY 2012/13 MID -YEAR BUDGET PERFORMANCE AND STATUS REPORT -
SIX MONTHS ENDING DECEMBER 31, 2012
February 19, 2013
Updated 02/08/2013
Town of Los Gatos General Fund
Updated Five -Year Financial Plan
FYI F\ "_' F1'? FN F1'5
2011/12
2012/13
2012113
201314
2014115
2015116
2016117
2017118
Account
Resenue Calegom
Aeluais
Budget
Estimated
F9renst
Forecast
Fonnst
Forecast
Fooest
4100 Property T.
S 75
S 8.0
S 7.9
S 7.8
S 8.0
S 8.2
S 8.4
S 8.6
4110 \TF Backfill Property Ta
_ - - - --
23
23
2.4
2.4
2.4
2.5
2.5
25
4200 Sales &Use Ta
9.9
7.9
7.4
79
73
7.9
8.0
83
4250 Franchise Fees
2.0
1.9
2.0
2.0
2.1
2.1
2.2
23
4251 Transient Occupancy T.
11
1.1
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.1
1.1
1.1
4400 Business License T.
1.1
13
13
1.4
IA
1.5
1.5
15
4400 Litenses &Permds
- - -
23
2.1
2.6
2A
2.4
25
2.6
2.6
4500 Imertovemmexod _ _-
09
09
OR
0.7
0.7
0.8
0.8
OA
4600 _ Charge forServks ..___.____._
29
21
2.8
2A
2.4
25
2.6
2.6
4700 Fines & F.,Ntures
09
03
0.7
0.6
0.6
0.4
0.6
OS
0.6
05
0.6
OS
0.6
05
0.7
05
4800 modest
_ 4850 Older Sources _ _
31
35
3.8
39
3.8
3.7
3.8
39
4900 Food Transfers In
0.2
1 0.5
1 0.51
0.51
03
0.2
0.2
01
TOTALRLIE \TES
34A
32.9
335
333
J2.8
33.9
34.6
353
Use of Reese, Depnsia
19
2.4
1.9
0.8
09
09
0.1
TOTAL REI UFS & TRANS FERS
S 367
S 353
S 35A
S 34.1
S 33.6
S 34.7
S 34.7
S 3S3
2011112
2012113
201VI3
2013/14
2014115
2015/16
2016/17
2017/18
Account
Expenditure Category
Actuals
Budget
Estimated
Foreest
Forecast
Forecast
Forecast
Forecast
_ 51101 _ _
S 12.6
S 133
S 12A
S 13.2
S 13.2
S 13.2
S 132
S 13.2
5120 Elected ORdah
-
-
0.0
5130 TsnPoran idnploc ees
0.9
09
1.0
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
5140 __ Ovenbue
05
03
05
OA
0.4
0.4
DA
0.4
5170 Oder Sa6 c
- - -"
__5,00
03
0.1
01
OA
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.4
Benefit,
6.2
6.5
61
6.7
6.9
7.1
7.4
7.4
6000 Supplies . \Iantlah. & 4t vices _
4.7
53
51
53
5.4
5.6
5.7
59
7200 Grants & award,
- -
OS
02
01
02
0.2
0.2
0.2
01
7400 Utilities
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.4
OS
7700 Find Assets
_
8060 mtenul Servse Char�" _ _
3.1
33
3A
35
3.6
3.7
3.7
39
8900 Debt Service
2.1
2.0
29
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
TOTALEXPENDFTURES
5 31.0
S 322
S 31A
S 329
S 331
5 33.7
S 34.1
S 34A
9900 RDA Ransom
-
-
-
-
9900 Opammg Trmtsfim Om
0.4
-
9900 Capital Transfers Out 10 GFAR
IS
1.9
1.9
09
0.8
OA
0.1
9900 GASB 4i Re1vm 31edie.1 Actuarial
1.1
12
11
13
1.4
15
1.6
1.6
EXPENDFfURES
343
353
345
34.9
35A
36.0
35.8
36.0
9900 Legally Requved Reserve Allocation
9900 Reserve
9900 Transfer to Stabilaation Resme
TOTAL EXPENDFfLRES &ALLOCATIONS
S 343
S 353
1 S 345
S 34.9
S 35A
S 36.0
5 35.8
S 36.0
RE ENUFS LESS EXPENDITURES
S 1.9
S
5 0.9
S (0.8)
5 1.8)
5 (13)
5 (1.1)
S (0.7)
ONOWNGSHORTF.A1I_AIITI(,A I toA
S
S
S
S 0.8
S 1.8
5 1.8
S 19
ti]ET RE ENUES LESS EXPENDITURES
S 1.9
S
S 0.9
1 S (09)
S (1.0)
S OS
S 0.7
S 1.1
ii
MAYOR AND TOWN COUNCIL/MEMBERS OF THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY
SUBJECT: FY 2012/13 MID -YEAR BUDGET PERFORMANCE AND STATUS REPORT -
SIX MONTHS ENDING DECEMBER 31, 2012
February 19, 2013
2012 -2014 STRATEGIC GOALS AND 2013 WORKPLAN
On February 21, 2012, the Town Council adopted strategic goals for 2012 to 2014 (Attachment
2). These goals represent special, priority issues to address during the two -year time period. The
Council typically reviews the goals on an annual basis to determine if any should be removed
due to completion or added for new priorities. Since no separate session is planned to review the
strategic goals this year, staff is providing Council the opportunity to do so during the mid -year
budget review.
2013 -2014 Strategic Goals
Staff is recommending the following changes to the Civic Enrichment strategic goals:
Remove the goal to "Construct new sports /recreation facility to meet community needs,"
as this project has been completed.
Remove the goal to "Implement Pageant Grounds improvements to enhance public
access." Although this project is still underway, completion is expected by the end of
March.
No additions are recommended given other ongoing issues and workloads as described
below.
2013 Workplan Issues
Attachment 3 displays current issues that are on the 2012 -2013 Strategic Goal matrix and are
underway or pending, or special issues that have been identified as priorities although they are
not on the Strategic Goal matrix. The table lists the project or issue; whether or not the project is
linked directly to Council's strategic goals; the estimated timing that the item is targeted to be
before Council based on discussions or expressions of interest; and the department or
departments who are in the lead on the item. This column also notes if the item would initially
be heard in a closed session or a study session. It is expected that the Town Manager's Office
would be significantly involved in all of these items, and that other departments besides those
listed would also be involved in certain items.
Because a number of these items are challenging and/or complex, it is likely that Council
agendas may only accommodate one or two at a time. In addition, staff capacity is limited to
undertake all of these projects /issues, as well as other strategic goal projects and day -to -day core
services.
Staff is seeking Council guidance on potential adjustments to the strategic goal matrix and /or to
the 2013 workplan list of projects to reflect Council priorities. Adjustments could include
delaying projects on either the Strategic Goal matrix or the workplan list. Some projects /issues
have timeframes that are outside the Town's control (e.g., affordable housing actions, etc),
however, which must be taken into account when making adjustments. The workplan notes
PAGE 7
MAYOR AND TOWN COUNCIL/MEMBERS OF THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY
SUBJECT: FY 2012/13 MID -YEAR BUDGET PERFORMANCE AND STATUS REPORT -
SIX MONTHS ENDING DECEMBER 31, 2012
February 19, 2013
projects /issues that could potentially be delayed given these are within the Town's control. On
the Strategic Goal matrix, the Los Gatos Boulevard Plan could be delayed and one or more of the
items on the workplan could be substituted. Even among the projects /issues that could be
delayed, in most cases there are associated pending or potential community issues that may
compel the Town to address them sooner.
CONCLUSION:
The Town's outlook at mid -year is encouraging due to planned expenditure reductions and
increased revenues. Understanding the growth limitations of key revenues and expected
increases in operating costs, such as employer retiree medical costs and other personnel costs, the
Town's highest fiscal priority will be to contain its operating costs on an ongoing basis.
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT:
This budget report is not a project defined under CEQA, and no further action is required.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The Second Quarter Budget Performance Report includes a number of recommended budget
adjustments necessary for FY 2012/13. As discussed earlier in this report, staff is currently
engaged in the FY 2013/14 budget development process, which will continue with restricted
expenditures and limited revenue enhancements, contingent upon the performance of the local
economy and any budget actions taken by the State of California to balance its budget.
Attachments:
1- Budget Performance Report for the Six Months Ended December 31, 2011
2- 2012 -2014 Strategic Goals
3- Draft 2013 Workplan Issues for Prioritization and Scheduling
THIS PAGE
INTENTIONALLY
LEFT BLANK
BUDGET PERFORMANCE REPORT - 2ND
INTRODUCTION
Purpose
This is the second quarterly budget performance
report for the Fiscal Year 2012 -13, for "the three
month period ending December 31, 2012. The
purpose of this quarterly public reporting is twofold.
First, it ensures that the Town is consistently
monitoring its revenues and expenditures so that it
can proactively respond to unanticipated changes or
emerging trends. Second, and equally important,
these reports increase the transparency of the
Town's finances. The Town is ultimately accountable
to its residents to use the revenue it brings in
efficiently and effectively to provide the highest
quality services, and quarterly public reporting
provides taxpayers with information that
demonstrates the Town is meeting this standard.
Content
This quarterly report presents an overview of the
Town's operating revenues and expenditures for the
quarter ending December 31, 2012, as compared to
previous years, and explains any notable aberrations
or trends in these numbers. This report also provides
information on any recommended budget
adjustments.
Timeframe and Limitations
The information in this report is the most accurate
and up -to -date information available at the time of
publication. However, this report is not an audited
financial statement and the numbers provided
herein are preliminary and subject to change as the
year progresses. No data on revenues and
expenditures is final until the Town has completed
its annual comprehensive audit and finalized its
Consolidated Annual Financial Report (CAFR), which
is released in the winter of each year for the prior
fiscal year.
With respect to revenues: The Town regularly
monitors and adjusts its year -end revenue
1
UARTER FY 2012/13
projections based on revenue performance and
other developments that may affect Town revenues
in order to develop a more accurate picture of the
Town's anticipated year -end financial position.
With respect to expenditures: The expenditure
information in this report is extracted directly from
the Town's financial management system, and
adjustments are made to account for certain known
payments, reimbursements, or transfers between
Town departments and funds that have not yet been
processed in the system at the time of publication. It
represents a snapshot of Town expenditures at a
certain point in time and does not reflect final
adjustments made to prepare the Town's CAFR.
Table of Contents
Introduction ................................. ..............................1
Executive Summary ..................... ..............................2
Status of FY 2012/13 Adopted Budget ........2
General Fund Reserve Status .......................2
Greater Economic Outlook ............................3
State Budget Update ........ ..............................3
General Fund — Key Revenue Analysis .....................5
PropertyTax ................. ..............................5
SalesTax ........................ ..............................6
Business License Tax ...... ..............................8
Transient Occupancy Tax .............................9
Interest Income ............. .............................10
Charges for Services ..... .............................11
Licenses & Permits .......... .............................12
FY 2012/13 Recommended Budget Adjustments ...13
Summary of Key Recommended Adjustments ........14
Financial Summaries and Projections ......................16
General Fund ................ .............................16
Special Revenue Fund ... .............................17
Capital projects Funds .... .............................17
Internal Service Funds .... .............................18
Trust and Agency Funds . .............................19
Redevelopment Agency . .............................19
Conclusion....................................... .............................19
ATTACHMENT 1
BUDGET PERFORMANCE REPORT - 2ND QUARTER FY 2012/13
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Status of FY 2012/13 Adopted Budget
Overall second quarter General Fund revenues are
trending favorably when compared to the second
quarter of Fiscal Year 2011/12. However, due to
some projected revenue increases, staff is
recommending a cumulative budget increase of
approximately $364,470 from adopted budgeted
estimates. The current forecast expects a
substantial increase in Charges for Services due to
new fees being collected from the West Valley
Collection & Recycle as well as requested revenues
of approximately $225,000 for reimbursement from
the City of Monte Sereno as a result of direct
expenses related to the homicide investigation that
occurred earlier this year in that City. Revenues such
as Business License Tax, Licenses and Permits,
Franchise Fees and VLF Backfill Property Tax are all
trending favorably, a strong indication that the
economic outlook is improving as forecasted.
General Fund expenditure totals for the second
quarter are trending in accordance with forecasts,
with total operational expenditures at the end of the
second quarter at about 48% of budget. With six
months of data now available, staff can better
predict the next six months of expenditure trends,
although unexpected costs can occur. Should any
budget adjustments be necessary to balance
operating revenue and expenditures, staff will advise
Council accordingly. Expenditure additions at this
time include increased costs for staffing, overtime
costs for Police expenses related to the Monte
Sereno homicide investigation_ and the
Winchester /Lark Intersection Design -Phase project.
Providing services to the community in this and
future fiscal years will continue to require strong
performance by economically sensitive revenues to
offset uncontrollable cost increases. The FY 2013/14
budget development process will endeavor to
maintain essential public services while controlling
operational costs in light of the five -year fiscal
2
forecast, which predicts operating revenue shortfalls
in subsequent fiscal years
General Fund Reserve Status - 6/30/12
General Fund Reserves closed at a balance of
approximately $23.5 million at June 30, 2012 in
designated reserves which is in accordance with
Town financial policies and operating and capital
budget requirements, and includes a $4.2 million
Catastrophic Reserve.
General Fund reserves are classified into two
categories — Restricted and Designated. Restricted
reserves are those which are restricted in use by
accounting standards or legal agreements and are
not considered available for use for another
purpose. Designated reserves are established by
Council Policy for an intended purpose. With the
dissolution of the RDA, the Town no longer has
restricted reserves.
Designated General Fund Reserves
Amount (Millions)
Designated for Capital and Special Projects
$ 7.0
Designated for Budget Stablizalion Reserve
6.7
Designated for Catastrophic Reserve
4.2
Unallocated
2.3
Vason land Sale
1.6
Designated for Open Space
0.6
Designated for Special Studies
0.5
Retiree Medical Aclurial
0.4
Suslanabilily Reserve
0.1
Designated for Mani Contingency and Productitily
0.1
Total Designated General Fund Reserves
$ 23.6
The reserve for Capital and Special Projects, funded
from annual available General Fund budget savings,
serves as the primary source for replenishment to
the Town's Capital Improvement Fund (GFAR). As
such, it represents a limited source for a large
number of unfunded needs identified during the
annual capital improvement plan process. This
reserve also functions as a potential funding source
for new capital projects or augmentations to
authorized projects funded through the Town's Five
Year Capital Improvement Program (CIP).
BUDGET PERFORMANCE REPORT - 2ND QUARTER FY 2012/13
The Budget Stabilization Reserve was established to
serve as a transitional "bridge" funding source to
mitigate or smooth out cyclical ups and downs in
locally generated revenues due to fluctuations in the
local economy or "one- time" revenue losses where
the revenue base is likely to be restored in the near
future. The Town has not yet had to rely on or use
this reserve during the "Great Recession."
These funds are referred to as Designated General
Fund reserves since these are established by Council
polity for their intended purpose. The availability of
approximately $23.5 million in Designated General
Fund reserves provides the Town with resources to
manage through current and /or future fiscal
challenges and opportunities.
Greater Economic Outlook
Much of the economic uncertainty that plagued
employers in 2012 due to federal tax and spending
policies has carried over into 2013. While temporary
State Budget Update
Although the state has reached a point where its
underlying expenditures and revenues are roughly in
balance, under the Governors multiyear plan, the
state would still have no sizable reserve at the end of
FY 16/17 and would not have begun the process of
addressing the huge unfunded liabilities associated
with the teacher's retirement system and state
retiree health benefits. As such, the state faces
daunting budget choices even in a much - improved
fiscal environment. Special fund loan repayments
and the state's role in funding local governemnt
infrastructure could be impacted.
Gains in consumer spending and employment in
2012, signal that California is moving in the right
direction. Taxable retails sales during the first half of
2012 grew 8.8 percent over th same period in 2011.
New motor vehicle registrations issued during the
frist 10 months of 2012 increased over 25 percent.
During the first 11 montsh of the year, the state
payroll tax cuts ended January 1, the deadline for
gained an average of 21,200 jobs per month, which
making decision on $1.2 trillion in automatic
is the strongest pace of job growth since 2005. Job
spending cuts as well as debate over raising the debt
growth came entirely from the private sector as
ceiling was extended to March 1 and May 18,
government employment continued to decline
respectively. The extension has tempered business
throughout the year.
investment and hiring. To encourage business to
invest in capital improvements, a last minute "fiscal
cliff' deal included a one -year tax break extension
on new or leased equipment. Nonetheless, a
prolonged impasse by federal leaders concerning the
debt ceiling could dampen consumer, business, and
investor confidence, thereby damaging the modest
economic recover much as it did in 2011.
Although the payroll tax hike will likely shave up to
one percent from gross domestic product (GDP) this
year, the looming federal spending cuts that are
already written into the books will likely result in
GDP growth of about two percent, at best, similar to
last year's pace. Consumer confidence, already the
highest in five years, is expected to continue
improving as home prices and employment rise.
wx of
BUDGET PERFORMANCE REPORT - 2ND QUARTER FY 2012/13
!ps CaA��9
GENERAL FUND — KEY REVENUE ANALYSIS
The following discussion provides a status of significant General Fund revenue sources as of the second quarter,
ending December 31, 2012. Staff monitors each revenue source closley and may recommend certain revenue
adjustments based on revenue actuals or state budget action.
Property Tax
Property tax is the largest revenue source for the Town's General Fund, accounting for 24.5% of budgeted General
Fund revenues in FY 2012/13. Property tax is levied by the Santa Clara County Assessors Office at 1% of a
property's assessed value, of which the Town receives approximately 9.3 cents per dollar paid on property located
within the municipal limits of Los Gatos. In compliance with proposition 13, the assessed value of real property is
based on the 1975/76 assessment roll value, adjusted by 2% inflation factor thereafter. However, when property
changes hands or new construction occurs, property is reassessed at its current market value. Real property
values critically impact revenues. With the passage of Proposition 13, voters limited the tax rate that can be
imposed by the Town on property. With the limitation on rates, therefore, higher revenues are generated by a
higher aggregate property value.
Analysis - Property Tax distributions are largely received in the third and fourth quarters. Second quarter receipts
are up about 19% when compared to the second quarter of the previous fiscal year and are at 47% of budgeted
totals. Property tax revenue for FY 2012/13 was budgeted higher than previous years actuals projecting an
increase in real estate transactions. Property tax appears to be tracking slightly lower than forecasted and
therefore a budget reduction of $173,053 is recommended.
$10,000,000
$8.000,000
$6,000,000
$4,000,000
$2,000,000
Quarterly and Annual Revenues
5 -Year History
FYMU) IYW /10 FY 10/11 FY 11/12 FY 12/13
02x1 Quarter
Actual Revenues
oFisral YearToral
Actual Revenues
• Fiscal Year
Budgeted
Revenues
FY 08/09
FY09 /10
FY 10 /11
FY 11/12
FY 12/13
2nd Quarter Actual Revenues
$ 3,160,810
S 3,191,286
$ 3,763,165
$ 3,155,476
$ 3,753,004
Fiscal Year Total Actual Revenues
$ 9,724,070
S 9,809,365
$ 9,597,378
$ 7,511,381
Fiscal Year Budgated Revenues
S 8,021,117
2nd Quarter Percent of Total
32.51%
32.53%
39.21%
42.01%
46.79%
Recommended Budget Revision
S (173,053)
YIN F.
+ + BUDGET PERFORMANCE REPORT - 2ND QUARTER FY 2012/13
� s_sp`os
Sales Tax
Sales tax is the second largest revenue source for the Town's General Fund, accounting for 24% of budgeted
General Fund revenues for FY 2012/13. The Town receives 1 cent for every 8.375 cents of sales tax paid per dollar
on retail sales and taxable services transacted within Los Gatos. Since the implementation of the mechanism
commonly known as the "triple flip," the State Board of Equalization retains 0.25 cents of the Town's 1 -cent share
and requires the Santa Clara County Auditor to replace it with an equal amount of property tax revenue. Revenues
are remitted from the State to the Town on a monthly basis, and from the County to the Town on a biannual basis.
These revenues are placed in the General Fund for unrestricted uses.
Analysis — Second quarter receipts are trending consistent with those in the same period in the past fiscal year,
with collection around 38% of budgeted revenues. It should be noted that the Town anticipated lower sales tax
revenue for the year and budgeted revenues at 21% less than FY 2011/12, primarily due to the change in business
model for Netflix. Current trends show that sales tax revenue is less than originally forecasted and therefore staff
recommends a budget reduction of $416,144.
$10,000,000
$8,000,000
$6,000,000
$4,000,000
$2,000,000
$-
Quarterly and Annual Revenues
5- YearHistory
FY08109 FY09 /10 FY 10 /11 FY I1 /12 FY 12/13
■ 2nd Quarinr Actual
Revenue
o Fiscal Year Total
Actual Revenues
■ Fiset YwrBudgeted
Revenue
FY 11/12
FY 08/09
FY09 /10
FY 10/11
2nd Quarter Actual Revenues
$3,236,975
$ 3,221,690
$ 4,776,828
Fiscal Year Total Actual Revenues
$8,487,000
$ 8,317,216
$ 9,971,409
Fiscal Year Budgeted Revenues
2nd Quarter Percent of Total
38.14%
38.74%
47.91%
■ 2nd Quarinr Actual
Revenue
o Fiscal Year Total
Actual Revenues
■ Fiset YwrBudgeted
Revenue
FY 11/12
FY 12/13
$ 3,667,071
$ 2,975,082
$ 9,889,100
$ 7,859,000
37.08%
37.860%
Recommended Budget Revision $ (416, 144)
5
silos wx �.
�V1� � BUDGET PERFORMANCE REPORT - 2ND QUARTER FY 2012/13
SOS
Franchise Fees
Franchise fees are collected by the Town for the privilege of operating a utility service within Los Gatos, and as a
fee in lieu of a business license tax. Franchise fees are currently received from Comcast for cable television, PG &E
for gas and electric services, West Valley Collection and Recycling for solid waste collection services, and AT &T and
Comcast for video services. Franchise fees represent 5.9% of budgeted General Fund revenues in FY 2012/13.
Analysis — Historically, franchise payments are not remitted equally throughout the fiscal year; therefore second
quarter receipts are not necessarily predictive. Total franchise fee revenues are trending slightly ahead of those of
the second quarter in FY 2011/12. This improved trend can be attributed to the increased construction activity
and addition of new homes to the customer base. Staff recommends a budget revenue increase of $70,120.
$2,000,000
$1,500,000
$1,000,000
$500,000
Quarterly and Annual Revenues
5 -Year History
FY08 /09 FY09 /10 FY10 /11 FYII /12 FY12/13
2nd Quarter Actual Revenues
Fiscal Year Total Actual Revenues
Fiscal Year Total Budgeted Revenues
2nd Quarter Percent of Total
n2nd Quarler Actual
Revenues
]Fiscal YcarTotal
Actual Revenues
IRi lYmrTotal
Budgelad Revenues
FY 08/09 FY 09/10 FY 10 /11 FY 11/12 FY 12/13
$ 548,795 $ 553,434 $ 626,592 $ 669,186 $ 685,308
$ 1,656,100 $ 1,699,850 $ 1,901,605 $ 1,952,488
$ 1,939,820
33.140/6 32.56% 32.95% 34.270/a 35.33%
Recommended Budget Revision $ 70,120
3
BUDGET PERFORMANCE REPORT - 2ND QUARTER FY 2012/13
Business License Tax
The Town requires all businesses located within Los Gatos, or those that operate within Los Gatos, to obtain a
business license. The amount of business license tax paid by each business is based on its business activity. Fees for
activities such as wholesale sales and manufacturing are charged on a sliding scale based on gross receipts, as is
retail, but retail is capped at $975. These activities account for approximately 25% of annual business licenses,
while the remaining 75% are flat fee businesses. Annual renewal payments are due on January 2 of each year.
Payments for new flat- fee -based businesses are pro -rated by quarter.
Analysis —As a result of the projected increase in economic activity, business license tax revenue for the current
fiscal year was budgeted at approximately 19% higher than prior year actuals. Current year second quarter
revenues are trending ahead of those of the previous year, consistent with the trending economic forecast and
improved economic outlook. Business license revenue is primarily received in the second and third quarter of each
fiscal year, and therefore the increased revenue trend in this quarter is consistent with expectations. There are no
recommended budget changes to this revenue source.
1,400,000
1,200,000
1,000,000
800,000
600,000
400,000
200,000
Quarterly and Annual Revenues
5 -Year History
FY 08/06Y 09 /10Y 10 11FY 11 /1BY 12/13
m2naQuarter
Actual
Revenues
OFiscal Year
Total Actual
Revenues
■ Fiscal Year
Total
Budgeted
7
FY 08/09
FY09 /10
FY 10 /I1
FY 11/12
FY 12/13
2nd Quarter Actual Revenues
376,704
470,833
368,757
209,377
326,828
Fiscal Year Total Actual Revenues
$ 1,139,107 $
1,220,802 $
1,136,511 $
1,077,620
Fiscal Year Total Budgeted Revenues
$ 1,286,510
2nd Quarter Percent of Total
33.070/9
38.570%
32.45%
19.43%
25.40%
Recommended Budget Revision
No Change
7
1 WN �F
BUDGET PERFORMANCE REPORT - 2ND QUARTER FY 2012/13
� s'srios
The Town levies a 10% transient occupancy tax (TOT) on all hotel and motel rooms within the municipal limits of Los
Gatos. This tax helps to fund Town services provided to visitors to Los Gatos.
Analysis— Visit California, formerly the California Travel and Tourism Commission, reports that visitors to California
spent $102.3 billion, a 7.6% increase from 2011, as both State and national travel industries are recovering from the
recession. With a mixed economic outlook, the forecast for California visitation in 2012 is for modest growth,
increasing 2% in 2012 and 2.2% in 2013. However, TOT is trending at a slower pace than anticipated and as a result
staff is recommending a budget reduction of $99,860.
$1,200,000
$1,000,000
$800,000
$600,000
$400,000
$200,000
Quarterly and Annual Revenues
5 -Year History
FY 08/09 FY 09/10 FY 10 /I1 FY 11/12 FY 12/13
112nd Quarter Actual
Revenues
®Fiscal Year Total
Actual Revenues
EFiscal Year Total
D
FY 08/09
FY 09/10
FY 10/11
FY 11/12
FY 12/13
2nd Quarter Actual Revenues
$ 436,515
$ 354,551
$ 380,129
$ 422,059
$ 434,419
Fiscal Year Total Actual Revenues
$ 966,638
$ 923,783
$ 1,004,659
$ 1,174,485
Fiscal Year Total Budgeted Revenues
$ 1,099,860
2nd Quarter Percent of Total
45.16%
38.38%
37.840/.
35.94%
39.50%
Recommended Budget Revision
S (99,860)
D
wx o
BUDGET PERFORMANCE REPORT - 2ND QUARTER FY 2012/13
NUNN
��8 CA1�g
Interest Income
The Town earns interest income by investing monies not immediately required for daily operations in a number of
money market instruments. These investments are made within the parameters stated in the Town Council's
Investment Policy. The Town's investment goal is to achieve a competitive rate of return while protecting the safety
of its funds. Interest income revenue is primarily dependent on two factors; first, the cash balance in the Town's
investment portfolio; and second, the yield on those funds.
Analysis— Second quarter receipts are trending below those in the same period in the prior fiscal year. Financial
indicators throughout the market are mixed. For example, from December 2011 to December 2012 the LAIF yield
declined from 0.382% to 0.326 %; however the three -moth Treasury increased from 0.02% to O -05 %, the six- month
Treasury increased from 0.06% to 0.11 %, and the five -year Treasury declined from 0.83% to 0.72 %.
The strategy for the foreseeable future continues to be to remain fairly short-term and to invest in callable agency
bonds in order to attempt to pick up a few basis points over non - callable agencies and treasuries. Treasuries are
being added into the mix of investments to attempt to keep the portfolio somewhat balanced, even though this
has the effect of lowering the overall rate of return. The Town also attempts to find good solid corporate bonds
when possible. As the Town's Investment Policy requires investment in conservative vehicles such as the LAW and
Treasury bills, their continued low returns will greatly affect interest income returns. Staff recommends a revenue
budget reduction of $471,334.
$1,800,000
$1,600,000
$1,400,000
$1,200,000
$1,000,000
$800,000
$600,000
$400,000
$200,000
Quarterly and Annual Revenues
5 -Year lEstory
FY08/09 FY09 /10 FY10 /11 FY11 /12 FY12/13
2nd Quarter Actual Revenues
Fiscal Year Revenues
Fiscal Year Total Budgeted Revenues
2nd Quarter Percent of Total
FY08/09 FY09 /10
$ 1,011,756 $ 687,571
$ 1,627,727 $ 1,129,895
®2nd Quarter Actual
Revenues
oFiscal Year
Revenues
• Fiscal Year Total
Budgeted Revenues
FY 10 111 FY 11/12 FY 12/13
$ 545,913 $ 476,653 $ 276,974
$ 942,977 $ 606,454
$ 892,990
62.20/a 60.90/a 57.9% 78.6% 31.0%
Recommended Budget Revision $ (47034)
E
W N Of
BUDGET PERFORMANCE REPORT- 2ND QUARTER FY 2012/13
�0s e%toe
Charges for Services
Town Service revenues consist primarily of planning, building, inspections, and engineering fees assessed on local
building and development activity. Development fees and charges are assessed based on recovery formulas, which
reflect approximate costs of providing these regulatory services. FY 12/13 Charges for Service were budgeted at
24% less than FY 11/12 because of the loss of redevelopment reimbursement for administrative and housing
support.
Analysis— First quarter Town service revenues, specifically Charges for Services, are trending well ahead of first
quarter results from the previous fiscal year, with 72% of budgeted revenues already collected. This increase is the
result of a change in how certain fees are charged and an increase in development activity. In addition, staff is
projecting an increase in revenue from extraordinary staff costs incurred as a result of the homicide investigation.
As a result, staff recommends a budget revenue increase of $867,175, which will be offset by increased
expenditures.
$4,000,000
$3,500,000
$3,000,000
$2,500,000
$2,000,000
$1,500,000
$1,000,000
$500,000
Quarterly and Annual Revenues
5 -Year History
FY 08/09 FY 09/10 FY 10 /11 FY 11/12 FY 12/13
]FBA Ymr"F pi Actual
Rlnnnnns
IF&9 Ymr`r ml Budgccd
Rmenws
10
FY 08/09
FY 09/10
FY 10111
FY 11 /12
FY 12113
2nd Quarter Actual Revenues
$ 1,942,481
$ 2,180,260
$ 2,039,800
$ 2,303,940
$2,211,225
Fiscal Year Total Actual Revenues
$ 3,003,821
$ 3,776,411
$ 3,360,607
$ 3,683,044
Fiscal Year Total Budgeted Revenues
$3,084,539
2nd Quarter Percent of Total
64.67%
57.73%
60.70%
62.560%
71.69%
Recommended Budget Revision
867,175
10
W N OF
BUDGET PERFORMANCE REPORT - 2ND QUARTER FY 2012/13
toy s�tos
Licenses and Permits
Licenses and permits consist mainly of Building Permit fees which are collected by the Town to offset administrative
costs associated with overseeing the proper licensing aspects of development. Licenses and Permit revenue was
budgeted at 11% less than FY11/12 in anticipation that development would remain slow.
Analysis — Second quarter License and Permit revenue is trending well ahead of second quarter results from the
previous fiscal year, with an increase of 17%. Therefore, staff recommends a budget revenue increase of $487,228,
which will be offset by increased temporary and permanent staffing required to meet the rising workloads
associated with the increased revenues.
$2,500,000
$2,000,000
$1,500,000
$1,000,000
$500,000
Quarterly and Annual Revenues
5 -Year History
FY08 /09 FY09 /10 FY 10 /I1 FY I1 /12 FY 12/13
2nd Quarter Actual Revenues
Fiscal Year Total Actual Revenues
Fiscal Year Total Budgeted Revenues
2nd Quarter Percent of Total
nF[ AYear TdlAcmA
R...
■Fi gY— TgMudgckd
Rvvcuuce
FY 08/09 FY09 /10 FY 10/11 FY It /12 FY 12/13
$ 1,121,789 $ 932,495 $ 1,151,498 $ 1,218,432 $ 1,566,216
$ 1,820,007 $ 2,035,308 $ 2,040,811 $ 2,361,510
$ 2,075,945
61.640/. 45.82% 56.42% 51.600/6 75.45%
Recommended Budget Revision 487.228
11
BUDGET PERFORMANCE REPORT - 2ND OUARTER FY 2012
FY 2012/13 Recommended Budget Adjustments
Budget adjustments are recommended for the following revenues and expenditures at the second quarter as
described below:
Fund
Prgm
Account General Fund Revenues
III
General Property Tax
(173,053)
111
1201
41141
M otor Vehicle In Lieu (VLF) Property Tax Backfill
127,180
111
1201
41211
Sales & Use Tax
(416,144)
111
1201
41211
Prop 172 Public Safety Sales Tax
Ill
1201
41613
Franchise Fees
70,120
111
1201
41132
Cable Franchise Fees
-
1 I I
PD Tow Franchise Fees
-
111
1201
41311
Transient Occupancy Tax
(99,860)
1 I 1
Business License Tax
-
III
Licenses & Permits
487,228
I I I
Building Permits
1 1 1 l
1201
43311
M otor Vehicle In Lieu Fee
(126,830)
Ill
4202
43336
Intergovernmental
79,351
I I I
Charges for Services
642,175
111
44511
PD Services for M cute Sereno
225,000
111
1201
Fines & Forfeitures
(59,631)
I I I
Parking Tickets
-
1 l 1
2301
0
Interest
(471,334)
III
GASB investment to market per audit
284,424
111
M iscellaneous /Other
75,844
I I I
Fond Transfers
(10,000)
1 1 1
4202
43527
AB 109 Public Safety Realignment Revenue
70,000
111
4809
44541
CAL E.M.A. Grant from Next Door Solutions to Domestic Violence
62,499
111
TOTAL GENERAL FUND REVENUES S
766,969
III
III
General Fund Expenditures
111
3401
62318
Code Compliance
45,000
111
4202
51111
Staff Salaries
70,000
111
4301
51410
Overtime for PD Services for M onte Sereno
225,000
111
4809
50000
CAL E.M.A. Grant from Next Door Solutions to Domestic Violeno
62,499
111
TOTAL GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURES $
402,499
0
471
Traffic Mitigation
471 471
-813 -0203 45933
Winchester/Lark Intersection Design -Phase
50,000
471 Traffic Mitigation
471 471 -813 -0203 82405 Winchester/Lark Intersection Design -Phase 50,000
50,000
TOTAL OTHER FUNDS EXPENDITURES S 50,000
12
sAios, wx °f
I ,jd BUDGET PERFORMANCE REPORT — 2ND QUARTER FY 2012/13
�0s
SUMMARY OF KEY RECOMMENDED BUDGET ADJUSTMENTS
General Fund Revenues
• Licenses and Permits: The recommended increase of $487,228 is primarily due to the increase in
revenues from the Building and Planning departments which has resulted from deferred revenues from
2011/12. The deferred revenues are based on larger projects that came in close to fiscal year end and the
work is not completed until the next fiscal year.
• Charges for Services: Staff recommends an increase of $642,175 in this revenue sources primarily due to
some increased revenues being received West Valley Collection & Recycle.
• PD Services for Monte Sereno: Staff recommends an increase of $225,000 in this revenue source
primarily due to increase expenditures incurred as a result of the Monte Sereno homicide investigation.
• General Property Tax: Staff recommends a decrease in projected revenues of approximately $173,053
which is in line with the estimates and forecasts provided to the Town from Santa Clara County.
• Sales and Use Tax: Staff recommends a budget decrease of $416,144 as a result of the slow economic
recovery and effect of the business model change for netflixs.
• Transient Occupancy Tax: Actual receipts indicate a slower recovery than anticipated in travel and
therefore, staff recommneds an budget decrease of $99,860.
• Interest Income: The continued low returns from key investment vehicles will greately affect interet
income returns. Staff recommends a budget reduction of $471,334.
• Intergovernmental: Intergovernmental revenues are trending slightly higher than adopted budget levels.
Staff recommends a budget increase of $79,351.
• Franchise Fees: Actual receipts are trending above those estimated on partial actuals from the previous
fiscal year. Staff recommends a revenue budget increase of $70,120.
• Public Safety Realignment Revenue: The Town anticipates receipt of State money to be used for parole
realignment purposes. Staff recommends a budget increase of $70,000.
General Fund and Oher Funds
• Code Compliance: A budget increase of $45,000 is recommended to fund additional hours for a Code
Compliance Officer. During fiscal year 2012/13, additional resources have been allocated to re- establish a
dedicated Code Compliance program in the Community Development Department. $45,000 has been
used to fund contractual resources— a part-time Code Compliance Officer - that have been combined with
in -house resources to re- establish a code compliance program on a four -day per week basis. These
13
wn,16S BUDGET PERFORMANCE REPORT - 2ND QUARTER FY 2012/13
resources have allowed the Town to address code issues that have not received sufficient attention over
the last several years. Additionally, calls and concerns are now being addressed in a timelier
manner. Resources required to address and fund Code Compliance on a longer -term basis will be
identified as part of the 2013/14 Operating Budget process.
Staff Salaries: Staff recommends a budget increase of $70,000 in staff salaries. Additional police staffing
time will be necessary as a result of the parole realignment revenues received from the State.
• Overtime: Staff recommends an increase of $225,000 in overtime costs that were associated with the
investigation of the Monte Sereno homicide.
• Traffic Mitigation: A budget of $50,000 is recommended to fund the design phase of the Winchester /Lark
intersection project. This project will construct a new northbound lane to Winchester Boulevard, relocate
signal poles, restripe the intersection and reconfigure the traffic signal system. PD Salaries & Benefits:
This expenditure increase is due to the increased overtime costs incurred as a result of the homicide
investigation as well as funding for a sergant position that was anticipated to be vacated in December
2012 due to a retirement. The positin is still currently filled and unbudgeted.
14
wx
BUDGET PERFORMANCE REPORT - 2ND QUARTER FY 2012/13
as
SOS s���g
FINANCIALSUMMARIES, PROJECTIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
General Fund
The following table is the Schedule of General Fund Operating Revenues. Vs. Operating Expenditures for the second
quarter of FY 2012/13, this includes comparison information from the prior year. In the last column are
projections of final balances for the current fiscal year based upon the early trends observed through the second
quarter.
Reavoues
Caneml PmpeMTu
V l DOperry Tax
Sadeks s & 8 U Use Tax
Fewshke Fees
Transient OCwpanry Tax
MVLFe
Bwm.s license Tar
licenses d PemWs
Iule�go.'em�renlal
alaega Or semk.
Fines S FoRein.
Intmes,
Q4SB Westem.1 to \IM m,Audf
bl'ncelknmu]0d,er
Fund Tmrn t
Taal Remoue,
Be arOlher Funding swells;
Bse of Ram. - Caprll IYOjttm
Use of R.em. -SpmW Studies
Vasona land Sale Reeve
Fund Balance Reauoe,aNns
Year End Savings
Caeryflreand Allocations
PER9 Bolan, Amount
Use of Wemal Service Resmes
Total Other Fnn&., Sources
T.A M.enues pm Rermes
To35B of Las Gatos
Schedule of Gc.lW Fwd
Operating Revenues vs. Operating Expenditures
For the period ended December3l, 2012
Ulaodled
PY11112
MI /12
M 112
M1112
812113
M2113
M2/13
FY12113
M2/13
Final
Adlwkd
2nd Qtr
%
Adopted
A6Jusled
2.d (fir
%
Flnanee
Balance
Bud R
Actuals
YTD
Buds.l
Budget
Aeluals
YID
Projecaan
S ]511}%1 S
],412,4]0 S
3,155,476
47A S
8,021,117 S
7948,064 S
3,753,001
48X S
78%83161
2351.1%
2256,930
-
PA
22'/2.820
2.400,000
-
3,173,691
1400,000
9,889.100
8200,004
3,66],0]1
43%
7359000
7,M2,856
2975,082
40Y6
7,442,856
M4,38
1,920,610
669,185
3YA
1,939,820
29D9,940
685}08
34X
2,009940
L174,485
1,000000
422,059
42%
1,099,860
L)D,000
424.419
4314t
I,0003D0
152M
141210
152M
49%
142,620
15,'190
15,00
100%,
15,]911
1,0]],620
1.0&5,000
2093]2
19/.
1286510
1286,510
326928
25%
1286510
2361510
1,902335
1218,432
R%
2,075.915
2561173
1566216
61%
2K1173
]83im
820,140
253.]25
31%
6,58552
]3],913
290,738
39%
]1]903
1691044
1558,951
2303.940
654
3,029539
3895714
2211y5
576
3,896.714
809,461
67L5
314,]89
47/%,
698,440
638809
254,816
40%
638,809
606.459
865.960
476,653
5515,
892,990
421,656
2]69]4
66 %.
421A%
(14230
t261.")
-
(284,424)
2359,668
2548302
2254,493
88' /.
2560288
2,6J6n2
222;811
Ms..
2,IiM.132
21,'23
416920
62.M
1514
536920
526.920
47,285
9•/.
5M,9M
Mp6L042
32959,045
15,023317
46V.
32]89,99]
3342,467
15,060995
4Y%
33,424,467
650000
700.000
700.000
]00,000
2,7KM
12000w
1200,000
1200,000
300,000
49,0,000 d900W
- JASO,IDO - - 2 }9pdD0 2391),000 - 1.900.000
S M.461912 S M609W S 15.023317 _ S 15 F10992 S 35914467 S 15,060,996 S 35}24,46]
Ell"mm,(IntloMS awl uo -tatnns)
Tnnarmn, Capial Pmieds
M,.,&COUnN
188334
2m,655
91.921
M%
213,057
211,516
92248
M%
211,516
Treasurer
112
-
109
0
-
_
Taal Capital@ Olbee
2,939,882
-
Anomey
215.M
223964
105,170
4]%
228,809
Mt51
101,451
45Y.
225,451
Adail"smlim Semk.
2,690.411
2947550
1124.748
470
2913}88
2974,921
1241,170
43%
2,874922
Comm Development
3,235,675
3,173,691
15311,151
48%
35211554
3532286
LM160
SPA
3532286
Pollee
13,411194
13,631320
6627583
49%
1338$939
13,3M.7M
6.455.714
Msl.
13538,758
Pads @Public WOds
5.440168
502,894
2,6113]0
W.
5,733W
5,6n Wl
2119,025
483l.
5.6]1969
Lbrary
1,810,809
1908357
929243
49%
2,192,690
2,1]4}011
1,091,418
W/..
2,174118
Tana Depi Pape.. S
26972,519 S
2],6.55354 S
13.120295
47,1 S
2.1911022 S
2.035210 S
13.41%236
JA% S
2,015110
Non -PyI E@end'aue , and otheruses
General Umematuat
4167,611
4384781
1988,761
3989265
4200.076
888.22
21Y.
1,726391
Talal No. -Depi Expenses S
4367.611 S
4_lW.781 S
1988761
681. S
3.989165 S
4100076 S
888.417
21% S
1.726.8%
Taal Opening hMnmlums S
31110,130 $
32,010615 $
1610)056
5(sl. S
RJW.2s2 S
32235286 S
14}14183
= ". 5
29.812.104
Cap xl & Oher ,,,endiWms
Tnnarmn, Capial Pmieds
1919,882
3 }509)1
190oc00
1,500,0011
1326.185
3226.185
Post Redmmenl BeveOls- .m.fl.l
1,090o1D
1.090900
1100900
1,200,000
0
1200,000
Taal Capital@ Olbee
2,939,882
4,440,000
3,100,1100
3,100000
4,476,185
Net Ocenaog Remnues Beare Capial Tram
A BUdlemd Beg Fund Balance S
34280,012 S
164x0,615 5
I61W,056 S I $
15280204 S
1335186 S
14 314183 S
0 S
34288189
R.erm,td ladwu
CapitalPmjttesi5p.el Prejeces
_
_
_
TWA Endelled Be ar Rem- 5
- S
- $
- _ S
_ S
S
PA 5
Net Surputur(L'se)ar Rem- S
1-'80.012 S
36480.615 S
16.109.056 5P4 5
352811282 S
35312M S
14314183
=% S
2288189
15
wll o
" I BUDGET PERFORMANCE REPORT - 2ND QUARTER FY 2012/13
!
86
The groups of financial summaries on the following pages present data by governmental fund type: Special
Revenue Funds, Capital Project Funds, Internal Service Funds, and Trust and Agency Funds. For each, the fund
information starts with a beginning fund balance, adds current year revenues, and subtracts current year
expenditures, resulting in an ending fund balance. Adopted budget amounts are provided as a basis for
comparison of actuals to date.
Soecial Revenue Fund
Special Revenue Funds account for the proceeds derived from specific revenue sources that are legally restricted or
assigned to special purposes. The Town's Special Revenue Funds are Community Development Block Grant Fund,
Housing Conservation Program Fund, Urban Runoff Source Fund, and several landscaping and Lighting District
Funds. Staff will continue to monitor these revenue funds but at this time no budget adjustment is recommended.
Special Revenue Funds
Budget to Actuals Comparisons
Beginning Fund Balance (Pre - audit)
Budgeted Revenues
Total Actual Revenues - 2nd Qtr
Budgeted Expenditures
Total Actual Expenditures - 2nd Qtr
2nd Quarter Ending Fund Balance
Capital Proiects Funds
CDBG Non Point
Grants
Source
LtDs
30,571
76,536
129,918
279,108
502,000
39,348
4,219
209,143
647
273,985
338,798
33,943
3,274
160,166
7,936
31,516 125,513 122,629
Capital Projects Funds account for resources used for the acquisition and construction of capital facilities by the
Town. Funds in this category are the GFAR (General Fund Appropriated Reserve) Fund, Traffic Mitigation Fund,
Grant Funded CIP Projects Fund, Utility Underground Fund, Gas Tax Fund, and three Storm Drain Funds. Capital
Projects Funds are generally tracking in accordance with the FY 2012/13 adopted budget. Staff will continue to
monitor these expenditures throughout the remainder of the year.
16
wx .
BUDGET PERFORMANCE REPORT - 2ND QUARTER FY 2012/13
°8 sal °s
Beginning Fund Balance
Budgeted Revenues
Total Actual Revenues - 2nd Qtr
Budgeted Expenditures
Total Actual Expenditures - 2nd Qtr
2nd Quarter Ending Fund Balance
Internal Service Funds
Capital Project Funds
Budget to Actuals Comparisons
GFAR Traffic Grant Fund Storm Utility Gas
Fund Mitigation CIP's Drains Undergd Tax
7,211,987 3,191,626 (671,281) 1,116,633 2,450,322 193,300
4,371,593 1,936,474
1,723,892 -
14,815,245 1,983,274
2,686,980 1,013,093
2,241,471 102,540
` 536,002 91,697
1,655,593 284,560
688,735 241,845
51,250 834,560
31,883 303,870
- 756,000
- 650,000
6,248,899 2,178,533 (824,014) 966,485 2,482,205 (152,830)
Internal Service Funds finance and account for special activities and services performed by a designated Town
department for other Town departments on a cost reimbursement basis. Included in this fund type are the
Equipment Replacement Fund, Workers' Compensation Fund, ABAG Self Insurance Fund, Office Stores Fund,
Management Information Systems Fund, Vehicle Maintenance Fund, and the Facilities Maintenance Fund.
Internal Service Funds are generally tracking in accordance with the FY 2012 -13 adopted budget, although
expenditures in the Workers' Compensation and Self - Insurance Liability Funds are trending slightly higher due to
adjustments in insurance premiums and claim activity. No revisions to adopted revenues or expenditures are
required at this time.
Internal Senice Funds
Budget to Actuals Comparisons
17
Equipment
workers
Self
Office
\Imgt Info
Vehicle
Building
Replacemt
Comp
Insurance
Stores
Systems
Malin.
Dlaint.
Beginning Fund Balance
3,133,400
2,300,638
1,595,140
206,571
2,473,342
521,709
1,020,686
Budgeted Revenues
439,532
659,429
501,292
127,500
1,020,673
544,325
1,138,086
Total Actual Resenues -2nd Qtr
262,420
355,982
243,183
31,867
504,307
268,750
620,772
Budiseted Expenditures
714,201
742,411
652,249
143,050
1,370,665
540,532
1,715,544
Total Actual Expenditures -2nd Qtr
60,611
486,914
527,948
59,476
444,865
206,208
446,234
2nd Quarter Ending Fund Balance
3 ,335,209
2,169,706
1,310,375
178,962
2,532,784
5849251
1,195,224
17
BUDGET PERFORMANCE REPORT - 2ND OUARTER FY 2012/13
Trust and Agency Funds
Town Trust and Agency Funds have fund balances as of December 31, 2012 of $175,003 for Parking District #88 and
$876,601 for the Library Trust Funds. No budget revisions are contemplated at this time for these funds.
Internal Service Funds
Budget to Actuals Comparisons
Beginning Fund Balance
Budgeted Revenues
Total Actual Revenues -2nd Qtr
Budgeted Expenditures
Total Actual Expenditures - 2nd Qtr
2nd Quarter Ending Fund Balance
Library Parking
Trust District
859,802 311,722
24,059
138,090
32,598
1,045
235,262
143,526
15,799
137,764
876,601
175,003
Successor Aeencv to the Redevelopment Aeencv
During the second quarter, the Successor Agency Board and staff continued to work diligently to satisfy the many
requirements and deadlines established by the state through AB1x26 and AB1484. AB1x26 is the "Dissolution Bill"
that eliminated the Town's Redevelopment Agency effective February 1, 2012. AB 1484 is the "clean -up" bill that
revised and attempted to clarify AB1x26. In accordance with the law, the Successor Agency continues to wind down
the affairs and operations of the former Redevelopment Agency by implementing programs and activities in
accordance with the State- approved Recognized Obligation payment Schedule (ROPS). The Successor Agency
monies are now accounted for in a Private Purpose Trust fund and no longer part of the Town's Financial
Statements.
CONCLUSION
The financial results from the prior fiscal year, coupled with the FY 2012/13 second quarter data, confirm that the
second quarter financial results are stable and improving. The Five -Year Financial Plan projects that Town's
financial outlook in future years is still challenging with revenue shortfalls forecasted. Therefore, staff will continue
to examine revenue and expenditure activity and work to identify opportunities to enhance revenue to support
current and future operating capital needs. Equally important is to ensure that the Town's current limited
resources are allocated to meet the priority service needs of the community.
W
Q
W
O
V
U)
O
a
0
O
LL
O
Z
O
O
M
d
U
N
O
N
V
O
J
i
i
N
W
W
N
N
O
N
l"I
N
m
3
.L
LL
"6
N
a
O
.a
al
tp
O N
m
C C ED E
C
@ OI «
... O
U
m
w p Q
y p m
r U N
N V
w
w E N O
E m C N y
E O O>
@gip °aciv
NEmErnd
._otEEc
E$
3dc�
cmo�d
Cott �n�
moo—
E9
.�0E�Em
0E
«ai
a U E U m
N 'p N y
C d 0 0
E C 3 m N
a m E N to
�'@
dtm wam
3 m.,
v nc
mk'o @
m N
o m
w°
9 w y d E
c
- N
p o
U
Q " 0 N
o
> m m y
d aJ
_.__m
c � '•
O V
p C m C C
W d @
C U
m L
p
N m@
W_ LQ % >
2
W
W W „ E
7
r Q
o
O
m
O
m
c 0
mN�
N E>
o>
°c��
�Ec
aEn
YQ ~.��
U
o
N m J .p
U
E O n
m-
U E E.a
oa�'c
J
X00
2=
U
mp,
Ec
m @
cw
EE
o.a
c @
U
=
W °
c
' a m
N
m m
_ N
• m
E L
@_ N J
c�Et"i
N N @ n 0
m NES
p
c cc
hod
c O r
Y
0 w v
m 2
W U W. N
m e
pl C
fA N p
N
D
7 mo��
�2'm
00 E
�aa
m c E 0
L N@
C
H O V ry m
m
0
O
O
ow E.m
ao'p
a'ow2
ao d
o.o m
c Z Y
C m e c
@ N N
Eo
N
V $ o
°O
>c>
°mcy
JE'vE
` >
o =m
pE
aoimm�
.
w
a 8
E
x =�
ay
J
U am
m
w m
E
E
- m
_._.
O m
T O
p
O
N
m
c
T N
0
o 5
N 0
o
O
$
d
m
°
mN�
cdw°
�
rn
rnv
c
n
p
Ec;jE
m y,_
p
c . N
c 21
•�
V E
>` J@ c
p Ol
�� c
�.np
Enm
R
'p Em
U
O L E
m
.am
m
=
ad U
m i 4p
J -
N
�c m 0
,c
C m
o9
�mN °
:m °
om o70
do
m.
m
,m -,
O
y
m
ywm
c 0 v
j m
W
N
m
co m
U
w 0
�
0
@
d
m
C
_
p
N
CAP
6 E
p«
« E N
o= N
N
C@ d
U'C
D N
C
p 2'6
l6 U J
C
m
O m Q
'C J
l0 N d
J
C N .p
m
• 2 0
E
m - c
d o
2) mm E
E 0 (9
c
E,
E O
yU
c.0 _
._ m c J
C J
N 0
u 0 `E
d
t
E m
C :O ..
m m N
•
N
r
m 2 J
n
=W�a
m U t
1 J m N L
C E
p m
r
m w
a$ c o
a c
3 m
o
0
c m o
��
N O C7 'p
c
M c
N
Y om m
ao°
E.°�
m
(7m
C
O -p
'
Nm°
Ea>>rn
C
CD 0
m>
@ p d 0
m
O
°
y Z
7
N m
C
m
• Z of °
mc
13
y @
o E
m- -
o
n o 0
f
m
m
n
a
a m m
E a
O E°
U
O
M
d
U
N
O
N
V
O
J
i
i
N
W
W
N
N
O
N
l"I
N
m
3
.L
LL
"6
N
a
O
.a
al
INHWH3VIIV
I
Jo
$"
\\
\/
i)
§�
C7
20 CD
k§
. /
g
2
f
7
£
§
\
k
}
\
�
�
\
\
4
j
!
2
0
CD
Tv-
r
<Ilmz0
>m
>0Tmm000
>w
>390Tr13K
§o�ma=&l0Ecx<gcO\a8°=
!a)mCD
���
;
I°
&8��
Ei0=
-a7
¥aa
CD
=ao$�
o
=0
�
=98REm�]E�§,
,
:n
e)
=,o�
%3co
-o7m�
E
-n0
«��e�
wmoo�,
>
c,J
=m
@
E3
�
nzo8m
z
X,
,
v,m
,min
=n
a
_o��mR
.
n
��-
,=m,�
o,=
CD
�B°�
-�
m
-c
<03(n
B
-0o$
¥
Ga,
=I,
\&•
�E,
=amEC
Ea
%o
>E,
-0
,
_
Cl) @mm
am
CD
,r_
a@0
�
*<®;§°
0�
a�
-
- -�
M
G
�§B
2
a
E°ƒ
a�2
°-
°Qa
®m§
2
2@
-
mC�
B
0
R®�
®
)Rf
-2v)
m
0
a
U
§
®
®
0
\
[
r
°
§
£o
=
q
/!
2-
{
i
c±
7
\
K/
A
_
7/\
j
&§
2
K
m
7q
0
A
/
§
[
{
{$j
0M{CD
{
{{CD
$
#
�zzz
CD
mzz
//
CD
00000m��0
zz
�)
Z
-
----
-
--
=
=ƒ]gme
,,
„
<,
2.
cr
:���a�+]
�j---
-
=g
\
%-
m
mma
§ECLEaa
m
�m
m
��&�
®w�
°mmm
#
/)3
-
-22
§2
w
_�
B■
=
=2
=
}
§§
$
-n
o
on3owo00000TT
-0
aoon¥
»o
¥o
>000
¥o
>w
0050�OOOOOOTTOKOvOK�-vKc
OOOKO
�
0oM00000000**
00000mvooj00000
o
2§44
&$
oQaa
±Q0
�
:
\§
)°
)
?
00000
§a
Cl)
a
CL
m
°
2)
m
/*�
:
0
/
�
[
o
y
E±
0
e
,
E
e
P
m
$
&
m
g
\
E
0
m
2
«
■