Loading...
2010092007 - Attachment 4Non-Focus Area Draft 2020 General Plan Elements (Safety, Noise, and Vasona Light Rail and Highway 85 Elements) IOI -Attachment 4 T IIIS P,-1 GE 1.\'Tl_\'770.\'. I LL I" LLF%~ BL.~1.\'ti 11 S~IFETY ELEb4E~iT .9. hrt,-odrrctio,r The Safety Element identifies and evaluates natural and urban safety hazards in Los Gatos, both existing and potential. It establishes policies and actions to reduce or abate these hazards to protect Ton-n residents and visitors. Additionally, this element guides the Ton-n when participating in resolving safety issues that are regional in character, or otherR~ise beyond the immediate control of the Ton-n. The safety concerns identified in this Element have been divided into the following categories: • Geologic Hazards, including earthquakes, ground shaking, liquefaction and landslides • Urban and \~~ildland Fire Hazards • Flood and Inundation Hazards • Hazardous Materials Ivlanagement • Emergency Preparedness, Response and Recovery Each categon~ is divided into the fo11oR-ing t~e-o sections: • Background Information: A description of current risks based on each hazard category. • Goals, Policies and Actions: A list of goal, policy and action statements that provide guidance on reducing risks associated with hazards identified in this Element. B. Geologic Hazards The San Francisco Bay Area is in one of the most active seismic regions in the United States. Each year, low and moderate magnitude earthquakes occurring in or near the San Francisco Bay Area are felt by residents of Los Gatos. S:-~F-1 TO\S-\ (~r LOS GATU~ DR:\ P I' __ GF\IiRA1 PL:\ V ~:\I~~?'i FLE\te\T 1. Background Information a. Earthquake Hazards The laR- requires the California Geological Sur•ev (CGS) to establish regulator- zones (knoR-n as Earthquake Fault Zones or Alquist-Priolo Zones) around the surface u•aces of acti\-e faults and to issue maps to all affected cities, counties and State agencies for use in planning and controlling de\-elopment. Figure SAF-1 shoR•s the approiimate location of the major fault zones in the San Francisco Ba\' :\rea. The principal fault zones in the Bae region are the San Andreas fault zone, which tra\-erses the ToR•n and the Ha\-~-ard and Cala\-eras fault zones. The San r\ndreas, HayR•ard and Cala\-eras fault zones are responsible for se.-eral large historic earthquakes with ground rupture and all three are associated n•ith ~s•ell-defined zones of seismic activit\•. Secondar- fault zones, including the Sargent, Berrocal, Shannon and :Monte Vista fault zones, tra\~erse the ToR•n. These fault zones are part of the Southwest Santa Clara Valley Thnrst Belt and are general]\• belie\-ed to be connected to the San t\ndreas fault zone. The San :\ndreas Fault is the potential source for larger earthquakes that n-ill affect the Town. b. Ground Shaking Los Gatos is within a seismically acti\•e region and earthquakes ha\-e the potential to cause ground shaking of significant magnitude. An\- slip along all or part of a fault surface releases accumulated energy that radiates in all directions awa\• from the source, in the form of earthquake R-a\•es. Associated ground shaking \•aries in intensity depending on the sc\•erity of earthquake acti\'it\-, proximity to that activity and local soil and geological conditions. Because Los Gatos is n-ithin the "near source" zone of both the San :\ndreas and ~[onte Vista Faults, the Town is subject to particularly strong ground shaking effects. S:\F-' TOWN OF LOS GATOS DRAFT 2020 GENERAL PLAN SAFETYELEMENT Mann San SOI ~ r10 ~-~1 Cont ~ Costa 5 -_ ; . ~_ _~ County Boundary ~~ ~ t\ ~~ \ Alameda ~`~ '< •~ `~` ~~~ :_\ \\ Santd lard San Joaquin .~ Stanislaus Merced `~\ i ~~ 0 5 10 MJes ~ r I a \ \ \'~'a~dsF \~~ \ cr \` I dpi '~f j \ San Benito r. i ~ ~--\ % ~' ~ l Monterey 1 11 ~~r ``~ ~~ ~---. a~' `\ '~ '~~ ~1 ;1 ~\ ~~ \'.\ ce: United Stites Gec!o3ic~l Se,n~ey. X002. - Major Fault FIGURE SAF-1 REGIONAL FAULTS TP\C X OF LOS G:\TO i UR:\FT ~ZA GEC: ER:\L I'L-\ c. Seismic Hazards The CGS and United States Geological Sun•ey (USGS) identify liquefaction, landslides and ground failure as seismic hazards associated n-ith eanhquakes. As illustrated on Figure S~F-?, these hazards influence patterns of development in California including Los Gatos. i. Ligrrefrction Liquefaction is the process b}• n•hich the strength and stiffness of saturated soil is reduced by ground shaking. It is defined as the transformation of a granular material, such as sand and gravel, from a solid state into a liquefied state, as a consequence of increased pore-n-ater pressure. Structures R-hich are constructed on soils \vhich are prone to liquefaction are subject to damage and possible collapse as a result of settlement and lateral spreading due to liquefaction. 1\Iost of the liquefaction zones are minimal in size and skirt the ToR•n limits. ii. L~»ufslir~es.nrd Grorntd F.rilrrre Landslides and slope instability are characterized by- the movement of soils and surficial deposits and bedrock doRm steep slopes. This movement results from R-et n-eather, adverse structures, seismic shaking, and/or improper grading and drainage. Because Los Gatos includes poItions of the steep foothills of the Santa Cruz Alountains, there is a potential for landslides throughout much of the southern and eastern portions of the Ton•n and extending as far nosh as Blossom Hil] Road. Landslide potential is minimal in the gently sloping n-est central and northernmost portions of the Ton-n. d. L• spansive Soils Certain types of soils have characteristics that make them more susceptible to geotechnical hazards such as erosion and expansion. Identif}'ing local soil types and understanding their associ:ued characteristics help cities to establish appropriate engineering and construction standards for neR• buildings and remodeling. The printan• soil types in the Los Gatos area are clay and clay loam. S:~F--- TOWN OF LOS GATOS DRAFT 2020 GENERAL PLAN SAFETY ELEriENT pVENVf ~~ 1 Clty U; QO ` ~ ~ CUfl7NER AVEN ` ~ J Town Boundary T oN ~ / -.%~i U Campbt it ~~P ~' ~ ~^~ _ `1 r~..I ,' 1 ( ~1 Sphere of Influence ~ ~~ ~ , ~ Water Body xwoRT' v N i _ ~ ~y - E o ? ' ~ Highway ~ ~ _ _yg~~7~ : ~ _ ~ a .~ - Creek C' of ~ •_ _ A ~ ` - Z r.. '~' ~ _ 5 toga ~ _ ~ - i ~. ~ ~ t ~! S ~ a ~~ _ , "~. >~-- '~ jf ; ~ k9y``N f /~ ~F ~/ 7 MARITAN ORI t ~ - e: ~l "~ = 1 ~ ,~ City Of .~ _- ~~ ~ {~ ~ ~; .~ r ~ O Monte Sereno ~ ~ ~ ~ - vs ~ o ~ _ ? "y J-~ -- - ~ LOS GAT65-A DEN ROAD ~Z 1 ~ ~ J~'~ ~~ o- ~-~ 1 e. Y f , ~ I ~ . r < Fy Y j I - ° ~ ~~ I ~ a ~ ~ ~ f ~ ~ ~4r 1- - v ry f ~ -~ ,.~,j _ ~~ ° /~ ~ San Jose ; I _~J O,~ ~' 1 f` _ALOS~OM HILL Ap' ~ yy~ ~ JJJ~~J~ ~~~iii1 O 9 4 a C(Z f l a r 7 -. Ij. ~ ' ~ ~' ~~ , f , era( P1sr',•! fi a __ a f °~ ~ ~-? . J y.-~ - : ~ ' ~ .~-~~~ - L .,-7 , _ -y .~~ -~Q _ ~ ~ t ~ti .~s ~.1"J ~ ~. - ~r 1 . , :1 ;. _ .. . _~ ~ ~ -. i ~ ~ lT I .'M11~1 STRE i ~~~ v- f ~ ~~ y 4 ~ j ~~ i-r ,~ I ~ ~ r .,.- -- .i .Y I r _ -- ~ r' r _ ~.,, i~- Y. _- _ _.. ~ c - ~ -_ ~ ~ oG - ...~. ~w1 ~~. ~. - ii4 - - i+w...~...~.y _-. - --- __.--.--_ - - - -.- __-__ ~. -._~ ~ P " _ _--~ Q - ~~..~-.~.-~i - _ i Rrsercoir ~ i~ ~ j ~ 1 Unincorporated ~""'~"~___ __ _= 1 ~• ' Santa Clara County ~ _ ~_ +rL~ .. to "5__ ~ ,~~ ,~- «~ .~.... _ .. ..~..e' ® i;. Source: California Geologic Survey. 2002 ® Liquefaction Zone Landslide Zone FIGURE SAF-2 SEIShIIC HAZARDS Z'c?u ~' Or Loy G:17 ~~S I>a~rr _~~: cr~rx.~~ rt:~s ~.~~~= rv L~t~t=~T i. Sl.»-ixk-SLLell Potenti.rl Certain n•pes of soil are inherently espansi.-e, meaning they- expand and contract significantly as their Rater content fluctuates. This dynamic, knon-n as "shrink-sn-ell potential," can cause seasonal uplifting of structural foundations and roads, accompanied by significant and often dangerous cracking. It follon-s that soils with high shrink-swell potential ha~-e limitations as substrates for engineering and construction purposes. ii. Erociort Poter7ti.r1 The potential for erosion generally ina-eases with steepness of slope, rainfall and in areas R-here the protective soil and/or vegetation corer has been removed by fire or grading. Due to the varied topography of Los Gatos, the erosion potential within the Ton•n ranges from low to vet-~• high. The potential for erosion in Los Gatos is highest in the eastern, southern and southwestern areas of the Ton•n. Erosion potential decreases toR-ard the center of Ton•n, and is non•esistent in the tZat areas just east of the HighR•av 17 corridor. HoR-ever, erosion potential is high to ven• high in the areas surrounding the north end of the Los Gatos Creek corridor. 2. Goals, Policies and Actions Goal SAF-1 To minimize exposure to geologic hazards, including slope instabilit~~, subsidence, and expansive soils, and to seismic hazards including groundshaking, fault rupture, liquefaction and landslides. (S.G.1.2) Policies Policy SAF-1.1 Require reliable evaluations of the existing geologic conditions of sites proposed for development n•here conditions indicate the possibilit}- of weak supporting soils or geologic sutitctures. (S. P. 1.1 -revised) S:~F-6 TO\C\ OF LOS G ~TOS DR:\P'r ?0_C G E\ ERAL PLA V SAFETI' ELE\1EXT Policy SAF-1.' Restrict new development and redevelopment based on the levels of acceptable risk and potential severity of geologic hazards. (S.P.1.? -revised) Policy SAF-1. i Preserve as open space propelrty that is unbuildable due to geologic conditions. (S.P.1.3) Policy SAF-1.-1 Buildings and structures required for emergency services shall have sufficient resistance to withstand a major earthquake. (S.P.1.4) Policy SAF-15 Provide incentives for seismic retrofits of structures. (SP.1. ~) Policy SAF-1.6 Require geological investigations for any development or project as mandated by the State or deemed warranted by the Ton-n. (S.I.1.1 -revised) Policy- SAF-1.7 As part of development review, the developer shall have a qualified geologic/geotechnical consultant fill out the Town Geologic Hazards Checklist to show that potential hazards have been identified and that proposed structures, including grading (cuts and fills), ~-i11 be designed to resist potential earthquake effects. (S.L1.~ -revised) Policy SAF-1.3 Require preparation of a repon from an engineering geologist and/or geotechnical engineer that discusses the geologic, seismic and geotechnical engineering conditions and potential hazards for developments in hazard zones mapped by the State or identified by the Town, as shown in Figures SAF-1 and SAF-2. (S.L1.6 -revised) SAF-7 T uu~~ l~I~ LI~i G:\'fOi URAF'I' _.. GF\rK.\I- PI .\\ Policy S:-\F-1.9 Enforce the California Building Code seismic stfet}~ restrictions. Require fault in.-estigations for structures for human habitation and all critical facilities. Investig.ttion may include field investigations. Repons shall include appropriate design measures to mitigate potential fault ground rupture/deformation to acceptable levels, and shall be revien-ed b\- the Town. (S.I.1.7 -revised) Policy S:\F-1.1~ Require geologic and geotechnical repons and Ton•n revien- during the development revieR• process for projects n-ith significant grading, potential erosion and sedimentation hazards. (L.LS.I? -revised) Policy SAF-1.11 Require geologic and geotechnical repoa-ts to specify constnaction methods to protect the proposed project, as well as existing residences in the vicinity-, from identified hazards. (L.L3.14 -revised) Policy SAF-1.1? 1`Iaintain buildings \vhose use and function are essential in response to a major earthquake. (S.I.1.-I -revised) :\ctions \ction SAF-1.1 Periodiailh• update the Town's geologic, seismic and geotechnical maps. (S.I.1.? -revised) Action SAF-1 ' Periodically identih• and retest, if needed, those bridges whose desuzlction n-ould cause serious access problems after an earthquake. (S.L1.+ -revised) t\ction S.~F-1. ~ Conduct a stud- to e\•aluate the condition of each building ani{ structure in Town whose use and function are essential in response. to a major earthquake. (S.L1.•+ - rcvised) s:\F-s TOU'ti OF LOS G.\'r05 DRAFT ?0?0 GEti ER:\L ['LAti 5:\FE'CY ELE\tE\T Action SAF-1.~ Amend the Tonm Code to reduce the permitted gradient for roads in areas determined to be high risk landslide or fault zones. (S.L6.2 -revised) Action SAF-1.5 Update the Town's earthquake preparedness information packet, keep it current on an ongoing basis and develop and implement effective means to disseminate it to Town residents and businesses. (S.L6.3 -revised) Action SAF-1.6 Create and adopt a Geologic Hazards Checklist to be utilized during the development review process. (neR-) C. Urban aril ~Vilrlland Fires The Town of Los Gatos is susceptible to threat from both urban and a>ildland fires. There are several factors that int-luence the potential for fire hazard, including population growth, vegetation, topography and weather. 1. Background Information Santa Clara County has a high potential for devastating wildland tires. Based on a "Fire Hazard Severity Zone" map developed by the California Depa~7ment of Forestry (CDF), the majority of the County is identified n-ithin the "high" fire severity zone, with smaller portions of the County within the "moderate" and "very high" fire severity zones. Figure SAF-3 illustrates the fire hazard severity zones in the Los Gatos area. The Town's Emergency Operations Plan identifies wildfire risk as a seasonal risk. The types of vegetation and typically high moisture content reduce the wildfire risk in the area. During drought years winds blow from the east, drv out the hillsides and increase the ~-ildfire potential. The CDF categorizes vegetation based on the following "fuel loading" characteristics: Light (grasslands), IVledium (light scrub brush) and Hea\y (timber and hea\-~r scrub brush). SAF-9 - Very High Moderate ® High ~ Non-WildlandlUrban TOw'N OF LOS GATOS DRAFT 2020 GE\ERAL PLAN SAFETY ELE~(ENT F[GURE S.\F-3 WILDLaND FIRE SEVERITY ZONES Source: Cahfom~a Department of Forestry and Fre Protection: Fre Hazard Severity Zones for State Respons~b~irty Areas (SRA) and Local Respons~b~~iti Areas (LRA). 2007.2008. TOW'ti OP LOS GA'rOS D R :1 F T 2 0 2 0 G B\ E R A L P L A N SAFETY ELE>tE\ 7 2. Goals, Policies and Actions Goal SAF-2 To incorporate fire safety precautions as an integral consideration in planning development. (S.G.2.1) Policies Policy SAF-2.1 New- development located in or adjacent to fire hazard areas shall be designed and sited to minimize hazards to life and property. Utilize fire preventive site design, access, fire-safe landscaping and building materials, and incorporate Fire suppression techniques. (S.P.2.3 -revised) Policy SAF-Z? Encourage fire safety improvements for existing homes and commercial building. (S.P?.6) Policy SAF-2. i During the development review process, carefully- consider the adequacy of water storage for fire protection. (S.L2.4) Action Action SAF-2.1 Adopt procedures whereby the public n-i11 continually be made aware of the Town's policies regarding safety hazards and be conveniently supplied R•ith information, including notification of residents of fire emergency plans for their area. (S.L2.1) SAF- I l TOIL-\ OP LOS G.-1TUi U K A f T _ ~- ~ G F \ ERA L P 1..1 .\'.~ F T l' F L E \1 E\ T Goal SAF-3 To reduce the potential for injuries, damage to propert}', economic and social displacement, and loss of life resulting from fire hazards. (S.G.2.2) Policies Police- SAF-?.1 'Minimize exposure to 11-ildland and urban fire hazards through rapid emergency response, proactive code enforcement, public education programs, use of modern fire prei-ention measures, quick safe access for emergency equipment and evacuation, and emergency management preparation. (S.P?.1) Policy SAF-,? Encourage neighborhood fire emergency planning for isolated areas. (S.P.?.i) Policy SAF-3. ~ Ensure emergency fire and medical sen-ices are available and ensure adequate mater supply for fire emergencies. (S.P.2.?) Policy SAF-i.-1 Restrict development in areas n-ith inadequate ee-ater floR-. Polic\_- S\F-~.~ Control excessiL-e buildup of flammable vegetative material. (S.I?. ~) Actions Action S:\F-?.1 Identity the characteristics of the total LL-ater supply available in the event of an emergency. (S.[?.) S_AF-1? TO\\" \ OF LOS G:\TOS DRAFT 2~2) GENER:\L ['L:\ V S:\FE'FY ELE~fE\T D. Flooding and Innttdatiott The Town of Los Gatos is required to identify Hood hazard zones and establish policies to avoid or minimize risks of flooding. I. Sackgroultd Information a. Flood Zones The Federal Emergency Iblanagement Agency (FEIVIA) has mapped floodplains in several portions of the Town, which are illustrated in Figure S AF-~. According to National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) floodplain mapping, portions of the Town west of Highway 17 and adjacent to Los Gatos Creek, San Tomas Aquinos Creek, Smith Creek and Ross Creek are located within the 1CC-year floodplain and other areas of the Town are within the ACC-year floodplain. Shallow flooding along some streets can be expected during significant storm events. The Parks and Public ~Yjorks Department has a storm response program. After a storm event, flooded areas are evaluated to determine the reason for flooding. Fortunately, due to its topography and local reservoirs, the Town has not been as severely impacted by flooding as nearby communities. b. Dam Inundation The Town Emergency Operations Plan (discussed below in Section F) is{entifies the Lexington Resen-oir, which is contained by the James J. Lenihan Dam, the third largest reservoir in the County. Although the SCV\C'D maintains that the dam has the ability to withstand significant earthquakes, the potential inundation zone in the event of failure is significant. Potential dam inundation areas in the Town are illustrated in Figure SAF-~. S.\F-13 TOU'N OF LOS GATOS DRAFT 2C2C GE~iERAL ['L:\N S:\FL-7Y ELEMENT _ll! J - uEl, ~~ Ci of G CURTNERAVEN ~ ~_••I Town Boundary ONT PyEN tY ~Qr ~..~: --.y.~ESTN /~ Campbell o ~ E ~~ ~• _•1 Sphere of Influence ~~ ~°~ /~ xwonr' vE E ~~ Water Body + ~ e`' - ~ `,Z. Highway i ~.~-,- y ,.i~, Creek ~ia i r4"~ ~;~ '~ ~ jt a ~^`~. Clty Of + ~~_ ;t t+ z t rt ~ Q. ~ ~ i 1 i J ~ Z, q ~'z~ ` r ~ I } •} ~ ~ YF'V(~F ; ++' '- MARI7AN DRI r. . t ~ ~~'~' ~; I i ~ p f I {' City of _ f ~~ ~<Q U } ~ n Monte 5ereno ~~,#/ ~ ~ J 9'sa /, P ~ . _...~ ~` } LO5 yATOS~Atr1ADEN ROAD ~2 ~. s -~ -~ < '~'•, ~ 1 _ ~ r' ~ . r,J city of °i oscq ~. ~ -,, `` of ,.~. ti;~sif I ~ ~ San Jose s rot ~ ~' ' L.~f~..~..~ -.:r~l-~~~os~M_ i.~oAO_ _ ~_- ro I ~ -';~ V ~ . ~ * ! Y ~F ~- / tf ~~ f ' /•~~y III ~ _ ~ - '~~~/ ,~it ~ A~ - t ~ -,% ~~ - f _ `_ r~~'' ~.. ~ - \ ~\ _ '~L•, "- r MAIN STRE~7 ~ - __ _~ ~ - i` f ~ ;` ~ _ _ • _ ~~ v+ ~ ~ + ~ ~.J eriifgtt 1 ~ y Derv ~ 1 ~ ~ 1 ~~ ~ Unincorporated `°~'•"'~__ ___- _--_ - ••~ f• Santa Clara County ~ 1 i-- - - . _ .._, V , ..~.._..-- -._.._....I .....,.._ _ ~_~ ®s Scurre: DC?.F. 2010~Tovm of Las Gates. 2CG9: Federal Eme~enc+ Piana¢ement AZencr. 2C09 - 100-year flood zone ® 500-year (loud zone FIGURE SAF-+ FEbia FLOOD ZONES TOWN OF LOS GATOS DRAFT 2020 GENERAL PLAN SAFETY ELE!.fENT r. ~.. ONT r`,rENUE C;i-~ O~ P ~[ _CURTNER AVENSJE _- l~ j TOWn Boundary ESTM Catrpi~ell ~ - ~ ~~-- - ~ ®1 Sphere of Influence 1 e m ~ y Water Body S~N~~~ i'r~~ ~ xwoRT1Y vEN Hi hwa S Y I` ~R, 1 ~~:~ ?t' J Creek ~r ~, •, 9'~ ~ 'Tr,,,~ t t _ L '~ ~- r ~i City of `f'3 - ~ t Sarato a ~ ~ ~ ~~ - /~= ~~. ~~1 ~.~i 1 , ~` IlvF x• MARITAN DRI I Lli~ti / > `: ~ _ City of .r ~ ~; n _;c2~ ~ Monte Sereno `' ~ ' ~,~ 9•so l ~ ~ O ~ ~ ` tT LOS GATOS-ALMADEN ROAD FZ r ~ ~ ~ rM 1 F` ;~ City of °' <oscq? ~' ~- ~ r~ °~ ~. J~~~~',fwf ~ _ j San Jose Ohs ~~ ~'r~ ~ ~ 'T -_•4 ~ _~(,~+~t OS~OM HILL AD-~ i a T s~ _ <* 9 Q9D jr ~1-~y C ;t~ {/J~~~)`.~>9LYtv0~ A _ -_ ' ' Y 9 ~ 9 - ..~ - ~ G i '1 - r i - _..-r~ ~ -. _ _, _ ~ i. s ~, j I~ ~I 1 Lerirrgtorr Reser•vorr• ~ I I ~ ! I I ~ t Unincorporated ~°~°-'•~ _. _. _.___ I t._..1 Santa Clara County j ---- {_ i ~..~..~..~i I~ ~- W _ e5 Note: Guadalupe Dam ~~s bcated ou'side of the bcunds of this map. Source:Acsoc~aten of gay Area Gevernmen~ ~a.i3AG). 1995. Dams and Reservoir Dam Inundation Area James J. Lenihan ~..,_.~ Lenihan Dam Lenihan/Vasona Dam • Rinconada Reservoir Guadalupe Dam O Vasona Percol ® Rinconada Reservoir F[GURE SAF-5 DAMS AND DAM INUNDATION AREAS l'O\S'ti clF Llli G.\TO~ DR:\F'r __ _ GCNLR:\L PL:\ V 2. Goals, Policies and Actions Goal SAF--1 To reduce the potential for injuries, damage to property, economic and social displacement, and loss of life resulting from flood hazards. (S.G.3.1) Policies Policv S.-\F-•+.1 :\dopt designated floodR•a\°s for all major streams utilizing the full floodplain concept as a first priority- and the modified floodplain concept as a second priority for floodplain development. (C.P?.~) Policv SAP-~.Z Limit the intensity of land use in floodplain areas. (S.P.3.1) Policv S\F--F. ~ Require site planning and building design to address identified flood and inundation hazards. (S.P. 3.?) Pulicv S:\I~--1.-+ Require development in FERI:-\ designated 1CC-year t7ood cones in the Los Gatos area, as shorn in Figure S:\F-~ or most current FERIA mapping, to meet federal standards. (S.P. ~. ± -revised) Policv SAF--1., Obtain fee title to all land required to be dedicated for flood protection. (TI i. l~ - re\-ised) Actions :\ction SAF--1.1 ~\nnually re\-ieR- all areas subject to flooding as identified 6\- FE?tt:\ or the State Department of \\ ater Resources, as required by t\B 16'. (neR-) Action S:\F--1 ' :\dopt floodplain zoning to prevent inappropriate development in areas subject to flooding. (CI ?.~ - re.-ised) SAF-16 TO\~'N OP LOS G:ATOS DRAFT ?~?G G F.~i F,RA L PLA N S aFETI' ELL" \tEXT E. Hazardous,llcrterials A material is considered hazardous if it has been designated as such by a federal, State, or local agency, or if it has characteristics defined as hazardous by such an agency (see below). The Santa Clara County Fire District issues Hazardous Materials Permits to all businesses handling such materials in the Town. While these permits help track hazardous materials use in the Ton•n, this element of the General Plan addc•esses broader issues related to hazat•ds associated with hazardous materials. 1. Background Information The California Code of Regulations defines a hazardous material as a substance that, because of physical or chemical properties, quantin, concentration, or other characteristics, ma}' cause either an increase in mortality or an increase in serious, irreversible, or incapacitating illness; or pose a substantial present or potential hazard to human health or the environment when improperly treated, stored, transported or disposed of, or otherwise managed. The California Environmental Protection Agency (CaIEP~) has the authority and responsibility to establish a unified hazardous ~-aste and hazardous materials management and regulatory program, commonly referred to as the Unified Program. The purpose of the Unified Program is to consolidate and coordinate sis different hazardous materials and hazardous waste programs, and to ensure that they are consistendv implemented throughout the State. a. Hazardous Sites The Regional ~~'ater Quality Control Board (Rt1%QCB) and the SC~1~'D have identified hazardous sites and established programs for cleanup and prevention of further site contamination. The R~~~QCB tracks data about underground Euel tanks, fuel pipelines and public drinking water supplies. The R~~~QCB also tracks the cleanup progress of identified sites and grants case closure n-hen the cleanup has been adequately completed. S:~F-17 URA I='1~ __ G FXFR.\ L PL.\ X 5 :1 F F 7 `.- E L E \f E X T The ToR•n is located n•ithin the Santa Clara Valley Groundn•ater Subbasin. Although a large number of Superfund sites are located R-ithin the Subbasin, there are fen- ground\\•ater quality- impacts from the chemical contamination on these sites. Overall, the SCl'\~- D's ground\yater protection programs ha\-e been effective in protecting the groundR•ater basin from contamination- b. Hazardous Aaterials Transport Transportation of hazardous materials and n•astes are regulated b\- the California Code of Regulations, Title 26. The California Department of Transportation (DOT) is the primary regulator- authority tot- the interstate u-anspor-t of hazardous materials and establishes safe handling procedures for packaging, marking, labeling, routing, etc. The California High~-ay Patrol and the DOT enforce federal and State regulations and respond to haz:u•dous materials transportation emergencies. Emergenc}- responses are coordinated as necessary betn•een federal, State and local go\-ernmental authorities and private entities through aState-mandated Emergenc}-1\Ianagement Plan. hfajor transportation routes n-ithin the Ton-n include Highn-ay V and HighR-a}` 8~, surface streets and the Southern Pacific Railroad. These uanspor-tation routes are used to transport hazardous materials from suppliers to users. Transportation accidents invol\-ing hazardous materials could occur on any of the routes, potentially resulting in explosions, physical contact by emergency response personnel, en\-ironmental degradation and exposure to the public \•ia airborne exposure. c. I Iazardous ~C'aste Disposal Landfills can ha\-e adverse impacts on surrounding prope[-ties, soils and the groundn•ater belo\\- the landfill. The ad\-erse impacts associated R•ith these facilities is related to the kind of materials disposed of in them, n-hich can consist of both non-hazardous (Class III), hazu-dous n•aste (Class I), or a combin:uion of both (Class [I). The Guad.ilupe Landfill, a Claus III facility- ser\-ing the ToR-n of Los Gatos, is located at 1,999 Guadalupe Illines Road in the Cin- of San Jose. S.-~E~-1S 'roue of= Los c:\TOs DR:\F'L 2020 GE\ERAL PLAS S~FET1' ELE\fE\T Santa Clara County has implemented a tree household hazardous waste disposal program for paint, sol\•ents, battefies and other common household hazardous materials. Convenient drop-oft locations and times are offered throughout the County of Santa Clara. The nearest drop-off locations to the Town are located in the adjacent City of San Jose. Hazardous waste can also be disposed of at West Valley Collection and Recycling (~~fVCR). WVCR accepts common household wastes, as well as used motor oil and oil filters, aerosol cans and E-waste, which includes: batteries, televisions, computer equipment and other electronic devices. 2. Goals, Policies and Actions Goal SAF-~ To reduce the potential for injuries, damage to property, economic and social displacement, and loss of life resulting from hazards related to hazardous materials. (S.G.5.1) Policies Policy SAF-~.1 Work R•ith public agencies and private organizations to prevent introduction of hazardous materials into the water and air supply. (S.P.i.l) Policy SAF-~? Phase I site assessments shall be required for all sites R-here properly is suspected of containing any toiins. (V.L4.~ - revised) Policy SAF-~.3 Support Santa Clara County Fire Department in monitoring the storage of hazardous materials. (S.I5.3) Actions Action SAF-~.1 Identify businesses within the Los Gatos area that use hazardous materials. (S.L~.1) SAF-19 ~ru\cx or Los c.\rc~s UR.\ i~ 1 _C3: GE\ LR.\ L 1'L:\ ~:\FETl" ~_LE)1E\T Action SAF-~.? 'Maintain an ineenton• of all businesses that store or use hazardous materials. (S.L~.2) F. Emergency Response crnCi' Disaster Preparerfrress All communities must prepare for unexpected disasters. The Emergence Response and Disaster Preparedness section of this Element establishes policies R•hich n-ill aid the Ton•n in preparing for, responding to and recovering from such unexpected e.-ents. 1. Background Information The Ton-n of Los Gatos adopted a comprehensive Emergency Operations Plan (EOP) in September ?ACS. The EOP identifies the existing hazards R•ithin the Ton•n, provides guidance and education on effective and skillful emergence response techniques, and ensures the most effective allocation of resources for protection of people and propene in time of an emergency. The EOP includes the fo11oR-ing topic areas: • Earthquakes • Heat wa\-e • \~'ildfires • Public health hazards • Floods • Haz.u•dous materials • Dam failure • Terrorism/n-eapons of mass destruction The EOP is intended to help the ToR-n prevent disasters n-here and ~•hen possible; reduce the yulnerabilite of residents to any disasters that cannot be pre.-ented; establish capahilities for protecting citizens from the effects of disasters; respond effectively to the actual occurrence of disasters; and provide for recoyen- in the aftermath of any emergent\• involving extcnsiye damage. In general, the EOP establishes emergency organization, assigns tasks, specifies policies and general procedures, and provides for coordination of planning efforts of the various emergency staff and setti-ice elements utilizing the Standardized Emergency Alanagement S}'stem. S.~f ~-_' roue or Los c:\-ros DRAFT 30?C Gf.NER:\ L P LA ti S.\FEr1" ELE\tE \T The EOP identifies the To~-n's Emergency Operations Center (EOC) as the location from which centralized emergency management would be performed during a major emergency or disaster, including receiving and disseminating information, maintaining contact with other EOCs and providing insuzlctions to the public. The EOC is cun•ently located at the Los Gatos Adult Recreation Center. The Los Gatos Adult Recreation Center provides a central location of authority and information and face-to-face coordination among personnel who make emergency decisions. It is anticipated that by spring 2C1C, the EOC will be relocated to the Police Operations Building on Los Gatos Boulevard. 2. Goals, Policies and Actions Goal SAF-6 To reduce the potential for injuries, damage to property, economic and social displacement, and loss of life resulting from emergencies. (S.G.6.1 - revised) Policy Policy SAF-6.1 ?Maintain up-to-date preparedness and response plans for fire, flood, earthquake, hazardous materials and other emergencies. (S.P.6.3) Actions Action SAF-6.1 Adopt specific design criteria for street identification signs, including street names and numbers in rural areas, and change existing signs to comply. (S.L6.i) Action SAF-6 ' Create and update as needed an outline to encourage disaster preparedness for neighborhoods and make it available to all residents at Town Hall. (S.L6.4) Action SAF-6.3 Regularly update the ToR-n's Emergency Management Plan and distribute it to residents and businesses. (S.L6.7) SAF-21 -roue or ro; c.\TOs DRAfT _ GEXC R:\1. P1. :1\ ti_~r-i i 10 NOISE ELEMENT A. Lttroclatction Noise is defined as a sound oc• series of sounds that are considered to be invasive, irritating, objectionable and/or disruptive to the quality of daily life. Noise varies in range and volume and can originate from individual incidents such as construction equipment, sporadic distut-bances, such as car horns or train whistles, or more constant irritants, such as traffic along major arterials. Section 6~3C2(I) of the California Government Code requires that General Plans contain a Noise Element that can be used as a guide for establishing a pattern of land uses that minimizes the exposure of community residents to excessive noise. Local governments ac•e requic•ed to analyze and quantify noise levels and the extent of noise exposure through field measurements or noise modeling, implement measures and possible solutions to existing and foreseeable noise problems. This section describes the existing noise environment in Los Gatos and is divided into the folloR•ing sections: • Introduction: A description of the scope, requirements and contents of the Noise Element. • Noise Background and Tertninology: A description of noise issues, standards and terminology used to describe noise. • Noise Standards: A summary of outdoor noise limits established by Los G:tt0s. • Sources of E.r-isting Noise:.1 summary of the sources of noise, including stationan-, non-stationan~ and construction noise sources. • Future Noise Contours: A description of projected noise conditions in Los Gatos at General Plan buildout. • Goals, Policies and Actions: A list of goal, policy and action statements that are intended to mitigate and reduce noise impacts in Los Gatos. NOI-1 l UU~ \ ltP Lllti GA"I'ltJ URA P'I ?OZ: GFXLR.-\L PL:\X ~CtI~F ELC-SfE.\T B. ~~"Disc Backgrornrd acrd Ter»ri~tnlogy The To\yn is generally characterized as a quiet, residential communit}~. This element identifies and e\-aluates unR:mted noise sources in the T•oR•n, and establishes goals and policies for reducing noise levels in the To~•n. Policies aimed at reducing noise levels must address specific sources of unn•anted noise, as \yell as noise-sensitive receptors. Noise level generation, imensity and related impacts should be considered in determining the placement of housing, open space areas and other noise-sensitive land uses. The State of California Office of Planning and Research Noise Element Guidelines (Guidelines) include recommended interior and exterior noise level standards for local jurisdictions to identify and prevent the creation of incompatible land uses due to noise. These Guidelines describe the compatibility of various land uses n-ith a range of environmental noise levels in terms of dB.~ CNEL, as explained in Table NOI-1. According to the State, a noise environment of ~C dBA CNEL to 6C dBA CNEL is considered to he "normally acceptable" for residential uses. Therefore, locating residential units, parks and institutions (such as churches, schools, libraries and hospitals) in areas R-here exterior ambient noise levels exceed 6~ dBA CNLL is undesirable. Additionally, more restrictive standards for quiet suburban and rural communities may be reduced by i to I~ dB to retlect their lo~•er existing outdoor noise levels in comparison \\•ith urban environments. Title ?~, Section 192 of the California Code of Regulations also sets forth requirements for the insulation of multiple-family residential dR-elling units from excessive and potential)}- harmhll noise. ~t'henever multiple-family residential dR-elling units are proposed in areas R-ith excessive noise exposure, the developer must incorporate construction features into the building's design that reduce interior noise levels to •1~ dBA CNEL. Figure NOI-1 illustrates the State guidelines established by the State Department of Health Sen-ires for acceptable noise levels for each N OI-? TOU'N OF LOS G a'I"o5 DRAFT 2 0 2 0 G E\ E R A L P L A ti \O[SE ELE ~fEXT jurisdiction. These standards and criteria are incorporated into the land use planning process to reduce future noise and land use incompatibilities. This figure helps the Town ensure integrated planning for compatibilit}- betR-een land uses and outdoor noise. 1. Noise Descriptors Various methods have been developed for evaluating community noise, including: the variation of noise levels over time; the influence of periodic individual loud events; and the community response to changes in the community noise environment. Table NOI-1 lists various methods to measure sound over a period of time. 2. Health Effects Human response to sound is highly individualized. Annoy ante is the most common issue regarding community noise. The percentage of people clainung to be annoyed by noise generally increases R-ith the em~ironmental sound level However, many factors also influence people's response to noise. The factors can include the noise character, variability of the sound level, presence of tones or impulses, anti time of d.iy of the occurrence. Additionally, non-acoustical factors, such as a person's opinion of the noise source, ability to adapt to the noise, attitude toR•ard the source and those noises associated R•ith it, and predictability of the noise, all influence a person's response. As such, response to noise varies widely from one person to the next and with any particular noise, individual responses range from "not annoyed" to "highly annoyed." l~'hen the noise level of an activity rises above 7G dBA, the chance of receiving a complaint is possible. The effects of noise are often only transitory, but adverse effects can be cumulative n•ith prolonged or repeated exposure. The effects of noise on the community can include: • Noise-induced hearing loss • Interference with communication • Sleep interference • Dissatisfaction, complaints and stress • Annoyance NOI- i DR.-\ FT '.._ G[XtiR:1 L PLA O i~ E E L F 11 C X; Figure NOI-1 NOt$E AND L:1ND LSE CO!1IP.~TIB[t_ITl' COMMUNITY NOISE EXPOSURE Ldn or CNEL, dB LAND USE CATEGORY 55 60 65 70 75 6U Residential -Low Density Single i i Family, Duplex, Mobile Homes - - - i Residential -Multi Family - - Transient Lodging - Motels, Hotels Schools, Libraries Churches, Hospitals, Nursing Homes Auditoriums, Concert Halls, Amphitheatres Sports Arena, Outdoor ~ Spectator Sports I Playgrounds, Neighborhood Parks it ~ j l_ i 1 ' Gott Courses, Riding Stables, W t R ti C t i ' a er ecrea on, eme ar es - - I Office Buildings, Business - Commercial and Professional --- Industrial, Manufacturing Utilities, Agriculture '-- NORNALLY ACCEPTABLE Specaee tang use m sabs!ar•:,ry aasrd upon the assumPtwn tnat any cu~b~9s mvorued arc d rvxmat con,entoru~i ccnbb4~Vn wrtMUl any s{rwa~rPS! nsWanon repwrements O NORMALLY UNACCEPTABLE New eonsbueepn a devtlopmenl should peneraity t» c~scwra9ed ~! new constucs~on « tle'reYaprn¢nl does txoceed. a de;a:ra anarys's of the nau reducbm re ,c-~rerrrns must be rww: and needed no ~e reductu+!eawres ~nCWetl m tta aesyn CONDITIONALLY ACCEPTABLE Nev cons:nclien or devebCment shwld be uncera.en on~y a9er a wta~~ed anarys,s o! me no.u requcton requnements a matle and needed none n u:a40n !aa;urea mUuded :n tbC dOSyn COnv MhOr+al GOnatNC,ron. bu: w'h COS@d windows arq kesn dt SuGO~/ sys[ems a au ccnert~crvg w; i norm ;y su'Rce _ CLEARLY UNACCEPTABLE New consbutron or CevC'pgment should peneraty not be uneertat~¢n. S,~urcc Ollice of Planning and Rest:areh. Calit~yrnia. GeNrrcrlPL„r GNideliNes, October ti O I--I Tou~x of Los c:\ros DRAFT ?9?C GENER:\L ['LA ti \OISE ELF\tE\T TABLE NOI-1 NOISE DESCKIPTORS Term Definition The unit for measuring the volume of sound equal to 1C times the Decibel (dB) logarithm (base 1C) of the ratio of the pressure of a measured sound to a reference pressure (?0 micropascals). A-~\%eighted A sound measurement scale that adjusts the pressure of individual .. - . frequencies according to human senstuvtnes. The scale accounts Decibel for the fact that the region of highest sensitivity for the human (dBA) ear is bern~een 3,000 and ~,CCC cycles per second (hertz). The sound level containing the same total enemy as a time Equivalent Sound varcing signal Deer a given time period. The L-~ is the value that Level (L:,~) expresses the time avenged total energy of a flucniating sound level. ?vlaximum Sound The highest individual sound level (dBA) occurring over a given Level (L~,,,,) time period. !Minimum Sound The lowest individual sound level (dBA) occurring Deer a given Level (L~s~) time period. A rating of community noise exposure to all sources of sound Community that differentiates betR-een daytime, evening and nighttime noise Noise Equivalent exposure. These adjustments are +~ dBA for the evening, 7:CC Level (CNEL) p.m. to 1C:C0 p.m., and +1C dBA for the night, 1C:C0 p.m. to 7:C0 a.m. The Ls~, is a measure of the ?-1-hour average noise level as a given location. It was adopted by the L'.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) for developing criteria for the evaluation of Day/Night community noise exposure. It is based on a measure of the . Average (L.~::) average noise level over a given nme period called the Lrj. The Lt~, is calculated by averaging the L-~'s for each hour of the day at a given location after penalizing the "sleeping hours" (defined as 1C:CC p.m. to 7:CC a.m.) by 1C dBA to account for the increased sensitivit}• of people to noises that a:cur at night. The fast A-weighted noise levels equaled or exceeded by a La, L~:, L.:, L--: t7ucniating sound level for 1°'0, 1C°,'°, ~C% and 9C°'o of a stated time period. Sow'ie: Cyril ~T. Harris, N.indLook o(:~~oise Co~arol. 1979 NOI-~ 'CO\[~ \ OF Loti G:\TU \C~IiE ELEtiIE \T C. 1~'oise St.r~ld~zr~ls Los Gatos has established outdoor noise limits, n•hich represent long range community goals for different land use designations n-ithin the ton-n. These outdoor noise limits are shon-n in Table NOI-?. The Ton•n of Los Gatos 1\funicipal Code describes n•hen and ho\y construction activities may occur, n-ith the goal of reducing any short-term impacts from consuuction noise. D. Sources of Eeisting ,'4'oise I. Stationary Noise Sources Commercial and industrial land uses located near residential areas currently generate occasional noise impacts. The primal}~ noise sources associated n•ith these facilities are delivery ducks, air compressors, generators, outdoor loudspeakers and gas venting. Other significant stationary noise sow-ces in the ton-n include consauction activities, street sn-eepers and gas-pon ered leaf blon-ers. Airports, fire, police, hospitals, schools and parks also generate occasional stational}• noise impacts- Most of the noise impacts from these stationary sources are temporarti~ and intermittent. 2. Non-Stationary Noise Sources The noise en\•ironment in the •I•i>n-n is dominated b~- .-ehi(:ular traffic, including traffic-generated noise along State Koutes 17 and 3, as n-ell as along major arterials. The major roadn•ays that sen-e the •I•on-n and conu•ibute to mobile noise are Blossom Hill Road, Lark Avenue, Los Gatos/Saratoga Road, Los Gatos Boulevard and \~•inchester Boule\-:u•d. ~. Construction Noise Typical acti.-ities associated n•ith construction are highly noticeable temporan• noise sources. Noise from consauction activities arc generated by nyo priman- sources: (1) the u'anspol-t of n•orkers and equipment to i-onstruction sites; and (?) the noise related to acti\•e construction equipment. These noise sources can be a nuis.utre to local residents and businesses or unbe.u-able to sensitive receptors. ~i OI-6 To\cv or t.os c:\ros D R .a T 'C 3 0 2 0 G F, \ F R :\ L P L A N \OI~E ELE]1E\T Tr~BLE NOI-? OUTDOOR NOISE LIhIITS Mar. Mar. Lai Lza 2-4 Comparable Land Use Value Value Noise Source Response Residential ~~ dBA Light auto traffic Quiet (1~0 feet) Commercial 70 dBA Freen'ay traffic Telephone use (~0 feet) difficult Industrial 70 dBA Freen~av traffic Tele hone use P (~~ feet) diffi It Open Space Intensive Light auto traffic '~ dBA ~ Quiet Develo ed Park ( p ) (1CC feet) Passis-e ~~ dBA Light auto traffic uiet Q ~iattire Park) (1CC feet) Hospital Light auto traffic »dBA Quiet ~~,,,~ ~ ~ Educational »dBA Light auto traffic Quiet ri^^ Foo.i E. Future 1\'oise Corttotrrs The noise environment in Los Gatos is not erpected to significantly increase as a result of the implementation of the 220 General Plan. However, vehicular traffic noise, the dominant source throughout the town, n•ould slightly increase as a result of additional traffic n-ithin the Town along local streets and major through routes, including Highn•ays 17 and 3~. Sources of non-transportation noise are not anticipated to substantially increase in the community with implementation of the Ton-n's Noise Ordinance and the follo~-ing goals, policies and actions. Noise contours for projected conditions R-ithin Los Gatos at 2620 General Plan buildout are provided in Figure NOI- 2 in terms of the Day-Night Average Level (L,:~). NOI-7 TOWN OF LOS GATOS DRAFT 2020 GENERAL PLAN NOISE ELEMENT i IUE Clty Of P Campbell ~'~~ _ o~ m/ e~ ~~ ~ yi City of Saratoga ~. _ ~ Town Boundary ~ ~~~ 5 here ofln0uence l.._r P Water Body Highway Creek . ~ ~ _ _ I , ' - - Sf1MARITAN ORI Monte Sereno •'" , ` ~ ^~ '' A, ~ 3 ;., ~ LOS GATOS-ALA ADEN ROAD I •vf"~-- r -~ ~ ~ o ti ~f M I I I~ ^~ City of o; so4 ~~ `'. ~,' ~..~ ~ I j San Jose 3 .\ \ Jq •.f t Toy ~ _ '{~ L i . J ~ •~. r~QO n~ A_p ~ ~ ~..., %~ INSTREE _ ! ~ '~.k~ t~~ r .. i i .~ i .~~..~ V" V~ir~ ' r ~~ .. ~' j I Let•iri~;t~~a ( Rcserrorr Unincorporated Santa Clara County ~_ Highways Local Roads - 70 CNEL 70 CNEL °-- 65 CNEL "; 65 CNEL 60 CNEL 60 CNEL FIGURE ti0[-2 FUTURE NOISE CONTOURS TO\S'~i Or LC)ti G:\TO S DRAFT ?C20 GEti ERA 1 PL:\ \OISE ELE\1E ~'r F. Goals, Policies and Actions The following goal, policy and action statements are intended to limit the exposure of the community- to excessive noise levels. Goal NOI-1 To ensure that noise from new development and new land uses does not adversely affect neighboring land uses. (N.G.1.2 -revised) Policies Policy- NOI-1.1 The ToR-n, as part of the Environmental Review process, shall requic•e applicants to submit an acoustical analysis of projects. All input related to noise levels shall use the adopted standard of measurement shown in Table NOI-2. Noise impacts of new development shall be evaluated in terms of any increase of the existing ambient noise levels and the potential for adverse noise and groundborne vibrations impacts on nearby or adjacent properties. The evaluation shall consider shoe-term construction noise and on-going operational noise. (N.P.1.L -revised) Polic}~ NOI-1.2 The Town shall maintain the noise ordinance standards. (N.I. L 1~1-revised) Policy NOI-1.? Employ the Le;. scale for the evaluation of outdoor noise for residential land uses and the Lei scale for evaluation of outdoor noise for non-residential uses, as shown in Table NOI-?. Pursue the outdoor noise limits shon•n in Table NOI-2 as representing the long range community aspirations and work toward their accomplishment, even though some may be presently unattainable. (N.P.1.6 and N.P.1.7 -combined) NOI-9 TO1c \ (~r LOti (;:\TUti (~ 1~~ f. L E \S F A T Policy NOI-1.+ Apply the same indoor noise levels standards for single family residential uses and multi-tamil}' dwellings. (~;.P. I.S -revised) Actions .action NOI-1.1 Adopt a procedure for reviewing the noise impacts of anv proposed development. (N.I.1.16 -revised) Action NOI-1? Establish significance criteria for evalu:ning increases in ambient noise resulting from neR- development and evaluating the compatibilit}' of new development n-ith the existing noise environment. (N.L1.13) Goal NOI-2 To ensure that proposed development is not adversely affected by existing noise levels. (N.G.1.3) Policies Policy NOI-2.1 L-1•aluate the potential for existing ambient and/or intrusive noise to adversely affect nen• development. (N.P. L 1 ~) Polio- NOI-?? Require all noise-sensitive developments adjacent to or R•ithin an area R-here noise levels exceed communin- aspirations to include a noise study and recommendation for reducing noise impact to an acceptable level. (~i.I.1.1 - revised) NOI-1 roux of Los G_\ros L)R:\F"r 20?0 GEYER:\L PLAY XOIiE ELE\IEYT Goal NOI-3 To ensure that roadway noise does not adversely affect land uses. (new) Policies Policy NOI-3.1 Roads constructed or improved by the Town of Los Gatos shall meet ToR-n of Los Gatos noise level standards or, in some situations, the Los Gatos Noise Ordinance, to the maximum extent feasible. (N.P.1.1 -revised) Policy NOI-3.2 The Ton•n shall take a proactive stance in cooperating with transportation agencies, including Caluans and VTA, to reduce noise from existing and future facilities. Noise reduction strategies related to the design and location of all facilities Rill be considered. (N.I.1.9 -revised) Policy NOI-i. ~ Require that stringent noise control measures accompany construction of ne~• County-, State and federal roads and highways, preferably by depressing them, but also by constructing sound walls and berms, by landscaping and by soliciting funds to modify existing noise-sensitive buildings where appropriate. (N.I.1.1? -revised) Actions Action NOI- ~.1 Conduct a study to identify traffic improvements that could be constructed or signal timing changes that could be made to improve traffic Vows without increasing speed levels to reduce high noise levels created by traffic congestion, (N.P.1.-1) Action NOI- ~.2 Periodically review traffic volumes and average speeds to ensure maximum effectiveness in reducing noise levels, especially adjacent to residential areas. (N.I.1. i -revised) NOI-11 UR.-\ 1-~r _-_ (:F.V F.R.\ L Pt:\ X Action NOI-~.? Identif\~ those areas adjacent to existing or proposed State IIigh\vays that presentl}~ need acoustical protection and request that the State construct noise attenuation n-ills as a noise-reducing measure. (i\,-.L1.-+ - re.-ised) Goal NOI-~ To ensure that equipment noise does not ads~ersel~- affect land uses. (new) Policies Policy NOI--+.1 All purchases of noise-producing ToR-n equipment shall be made R-ith careful consideration given to the noise impact the}' Rill create. (~LP.1? -revised) Policy NOI--1.2 Sen•ices contracted or performed by the ToR•n shall not cause undue noise problems. (N.P.1. ~ -revised) Policy NOI-•+.? The ToRrn shall continue to support legislation that encourages or requires reducing noise levels for machiner}•, motor vehicles and other equipment chat generates offensive noise. (N.L1.7) Polk}' NOI--F.~ All ToR-n-on-ned and operated equipment and equipment operated under contract R-ith the To\vn shall contain adequate noise attenuation equipment. (~1.I.1.3 -revised) \OI-L' TO\\' \ OF LOS GATOS DRAFT 202C GEV ER:\L PL:\N \OISE ELE>tE\T Goal NOI-~ To ensure that residential land uses are not adversely- affected by noise. (new) Policies Policy NOI-~.1 Protect residential areas from noise by requiring appropriate site and building design, sound R-alls, and landscaping and by the use of noise attenuating construction techniques and materials. (N.P.15) Policy NOI-~.2 For commercial and industrial developments adjacent to residential neighborhoods, additional restrictions beyond the Noise Ordinance may be applied to reduce noise intrusions in residential districts to an acceptable level. (N.L1.1-} -revised) Goal NOI-6 To ensure that sensitive receptors are not exposed to unacceptable noise levels. (new) Policies Policy NOI-6.1 The ToR n shall not approve land use patterns and traffic patterns that expose sensitive land uses or sensitive noise receptors to unacceptable noise levels. (neR•} Policy NOI-6? Review transportation improvement plans to ensure that noise-sensitive areas are not exposed to unacceptable noise levels. (TI 1.13) NOI-13 i~o~~ ~ or rus c:~TOs oKarr ~._^ cL~elt:~I. rr_sti \t~i5~ .. i. is ?.EXT ACtlOns Action NOI-b.l Amend the Ton-n Code to require buffers or separation betn•een noise-generating uses and noise sensiti~•e uses. Examples of noise sensiti.-e uses include, but are not limited to residences, hospitals, schools, libraries and parks. (N.I.1.~ - re~-ised) Goal NOI-7 To actively enforce noise standards. (new) Policies Polio- \OI-7.1 Enforce noise limits and monitor compliance R~ith noise standards. (nen-) Polio}~ NOI-7? Regularly re~-ien- data from both the public and pri~-ate sector to update noise control procedures and programs. (N.I.1.1 - re.-ised) Actions Action NOI-7.1 The Town shall establish a measurable program to reduce noise, including eftecti~~e procedures to monitor noise and enforce noise reduction. (N.L1?) Action NOI-7.2 The Ton-n shill encourage all lan• enforcement agencies operating n-ithin the Ton•n limits to enforce the State V"ehiclc Code noise standards. (N.I. l.l~) Action NOI-7. ~ Anv En~~ironrnental Re.-ien~ document prepared for the Ton-n for a project that is{entities noise factors shall relate the noise data to the 'Town's Noise Ordinance to gi~~e the Planning Commission and "ron•n Council a standard for comp.u-isun. (N.L1.11) \01-1~ 7 V:1SOiVA LIGHT RAIL AND HIGH~X'AY 85 ELEMENT fi. 1)i t7"QC~1l Ct1071 Vasona Light Rail (VLR) mass transit facilities are projected to be extended along ~~%inchester Boulevard and installed in the median of High~•ay 8~ and ~-i11 link the Town with the rest of Silicon Valley and the Bay Area. The Town is actively working on planning processes to address how it can take advantage of the mass transit opportunities presented by these connections. It is critical that the Town take advantage of the opportunities and respond to the challenges created by the VLR and Highway 8~. The unique nature of these transportation facilities necessitates that the Town take a proactive role in planning for the future of the surrounding areas. The ~-'LR and Highway 8~, as well as the land uses planned for this area, will affect and benefit the entire community. This Element is divided into the follo~~ing sections: • History: Provides background information about the background of this area within Los Gatos. • Guiding Philosophy: Provides an oven-iew of how the Town will help to guide future development and planning processes in this area. • Goals, Policies and Actions: Provides guidance to the Town related to decisions affecting this area. B. History In October 199 the Town Council approved several agreements with the State Department of Transportation and the Santa Clara County Traffic Authority regarding the design of Highn-ay 8S. The agreements allo~-ed for the construction of asir--lane freeR•ay through the Town with a median resen-ed for mass transit. Since the opening of Highway 8S in October 199.1, traffic patterns in the Ton-n have changed significantly. A reduction of traffic volumes on some arterials and collector streets has occurred, while others have experienced increases. Highway 8~ is approaching capacity during the ~•LR-1 'rUU' \ O f Loy GA"ro> \- :\ ~ (~ X :1 L I G !' T R A I I. .-\ ~ D f i I G H \C' :\ 1" 8 5 E I. F \f E\ T peak commute hours, but is still a desirable priman- transportation route. `['he future mass transit system R-i11 help alleviate a portion of the existing commute u'affic. The ~"LR is proposed to utilize the existing Southern Pacific Railroad tracks adjacent to \C'inchester Boulevard. The mass transit system n•ould connect the ToR•n Los Gatos to the City of San Jose. A Park and Ride facility is proposed to be located adjacent to HighR•ay 8~ on ~~'inchester Boulevard. This system R-ould provide a much needed means of connecting Los Gatos to regional mass transit systems in the rest of Silicon Valley and the Bay Area. The ~'LR area is shoR-n on Figure VLR-1. Generally, it is bounded by Capri Drive and \~'inchester Boulevard on the rest, Vasona Lake on the south, National Avenue on the east and the northern ToR•n limits. Since the VLR and Highway 8S R-i11 have a significant impact on transportation R•ithin the Ton•n, it is critical to determine n-hat land uses Rill best take advantage of these transportation facilities as R-e11 as meet the needs of the -town. The Ton-n has taken a proactive approach on this important issue and supports land uses that maximize transit opportunities n•hile meeting the housing and commercial needs of the Town. As stated in the Housing Element, Los Gatos has a need for affordable housing, both for seniors and families. Areas adjacent to the VLR facility and High\\-a~- 3~ R•ould be good locations for meeting these ToR-n needs due to their proximity to mass transit and to commercial needs of the future residents. Los Gatos is a special place, and it is important to demarcate our boundaries \\-hen entering or lea\•ing from/to other cities. Open space and gaten-ays, including open space as gateways, are means of doing so. The VLK area offers opportunities to preser-~'e and use open space for this purpose. \"L R-? TOWN OF LOS GATOS DRAFT 2020 GENERAL PLAN VASONA LIGHT RAIL AND HIGHWAY 8i ELEhIENT Vasona Light Rail Area Boundary Sub Areas Vasona Junction ® Oka Road North Forty FIGURE VLR-1 - East Los Gatos Boulevard VASONA LIGHT RAIL AND HIGHWAY 85 AREA -r0 \S' \ ~~ F LOS G:\TOS DK.\FT ?.,_7 GEX Eft:\L I'LA V \":1S~1~:1 LIGHT R:\IL A\U HiG'. 1C :\F ~+ E LF \7 i=\~ f C. Guiding PI-~ilnsopliy There are more large parcels of land that are suitable for residential development R•ithin the area than n-ithin any other area of the Ton•n. The current uses of these parcels range from orchards to unden.ktilized residential propeF•t}• to manufacturing. The commonality of all of these parcels is their proximity to future mass transit and their capability of helping the Town meet its housing goals. The ToR-n is n-orking to identify R•hich types of housing are best suited for the area, and where nen- development should be constructed. This area also has easy access to both Highn-av S, and Highway 17 and includes connections to several major arterials including ~~'inchester and Los Gatos Boulevard and Lark Avenue. These large underdeveloped parcels may be suitable for other commercial or recreational uses. Throughout the process of preparing this element, a basic planning philosoph}• has sen-ed as the foundation for designating land uses in the area: development should be communit~•-, pedestrian- and transit-oriented, and designed and scaled to maintain asmall-tosr•n character. This Element consists of goals, policies and actions that apply specifically to the VLR area. D. Goals, Policies and Actioirs Goal VLR-1 To promote the construction of Vasona Light Rail and mass transit facilities in the High~-a}- 85 median. (VG 1.1) Policies Pulicy VLK-L1 The Ton•n shall continue to support and promote Highway S~ as a multimodal facility that includes a h•eewa}• \t•ith IIigh Occupant Vehicle (HOV) lanes, mass transit uses in the median (light rail and/or express buses) and connections to the Vasona Light Rail facility. VI.R-~ TO\~',~' O F LOS GATOS D R :1 F T ? ~? C G E N E R A I. P L A N \"ASOXA LIGHT R:\IL .4XD FiIGH\\':\1' 35 ELE}tE\T Policy VLR-1? Circulation planning for the Town shall recognize the •, potential for mass transit connections via Highway 3~ and the Vasona Light Rail (~'.P.1.3) Policy VLR-1.3 Coordinate and proactively participate R•ith other communities and agencies to ensure that the proposed mass transit facilities are acceptable to the Ton-n. (~'.I.1.2) Policy ~'LR-1.# Future development shall contribute financially to support transit sen-ices that link the Vasona Light Rail R•ith the rest of Los Gatos. (~'.P.1.1 -revised) Policy VLR-15 Encourage parcel assembly in the East Los Gatos Boulevard sub-area to provide greater design fletibility and minimize driveways along Los Gatos Boulevard. (t%.P.3.-1 - revised) Policy VLR-1.6 Project applicants shall demonstrate hoR- their projects meet the specific goals and policies of the Vasona Light Rail Element. (V.L4. -revised) Goal VLR-2 To encourage affordable housing (senior housing, multi-family housing, mired use with housing) in appropriate locations within the Vasona Light Rail area to address the Town's housing needs and take advantage of the opportunities afforded by mass transit. (VG 2.1 -revised) Policies Policy VLR-? 1 Encourage development of residential rental units throughout the Vasona Light Rail area. (V.P.3,2 -revised) ~'LR-; To\c'N or Lc~s cATOs DRAFT ,._ Gr V FRAI. PLAN ~:.\5p\'.-\ LIGHT R:\IL :\XD HIGH\\'RZ' ~ ~ F I-E V i:\ i~ Policy ~'LR-?? Residential development proposals R-ithin the Vasotrt Light Rail area shall demonstrate hon- they address the -I•oR•n's unmet housing goals for affordable housing. (~".P.?.1 -revised) Policy ~'LR-?.? Proposed projects in the Vasona Light Rail area \vhich include residential uses shall assist the Ton-n in meeting its housing goals of pro\-iding rental units and affordable housing. (~'.L3? -revised) Goal VLR-3 To encourage mired-use developments that coordinate housing in proximity to either '- neighborhood commercial uses or employment centers. (VG 2.2 -revised) Policies Policy VLR-3.1 blitied-use proposals R•ithin the Vasona Light Rail area shall address ho~\• the proposed uses \rithin the development \vould be compatible and synergistic. (V.P '? -revised) Polic\- VLR-~? 1\Ii~ed-use commercial/housing developments may be considered in the Vasona Junction sub-area. (~'.P.5.3 - revised) Policy ~'LR-~.~ Encourage a mix of commercial, office and light industrial and recreational uses n•ithin the Vasona Light Rail area, especialh~ in areas less suited to residential dcvelopmem due to noise. (~'.P.?. ~ - reeised) V L. R-6 "1'Ot~' N OE LOS GATOS DR:\FT 20?0 GENERAL. ['LAN CASON:\ LIGHT RAIL A\ D HIGH\l'A1' R? E L£\1E~T Policy VLR-3.4 Encourage mi_ted-use development of office and medium- high density residential uses in the North Forty area and along East Los Gatos Boulevard, north of Lark Avenue. (V.P.8.1 -revised) Policy VLR-3.? Projects in the Vasona Light Rail area proposing all office or all residential shall be evaluated to ensure that the Town's desire for mined-use is fulfilled. (V.L8.1-split) Policy VLR-3.6 If development of air rights in the Vasona Light Rail area is allowed, coordinate with the Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority (VTA) and other agencies to aloon• development of appropriate uses such as affordable housing and neighborhood commercial and businesses that cater to commuters. (V.L~.3 -split) Policy VLR-3.7 Shared parking for mixed-use projects will be allowed _~ R-ithin the Vasona Light Rail area. (V.L8.1 -split) Policy VLR-3.3 In the Vasona Light Rail area, encourage mixed-use commercial in conjunction with affordable housing. (V.P.?.4 -revised) Actions Action VLR->.1 Conduct a study to eraluate whether development of air rights at the Vasona Light Rail station facility should be allowed or could feasibly be accomplished n-ithout creating visual congestion or violating the small-toR-n character of Los Gatos. (V.L,.? -split) Action ~'LR- ~? Develop and adopt standards for mixed-use design to be used in the review process of all mixed-use developments in the Vasona Light Rail area. (V.L8.6 -revised) VLR-7 rc~u x of Los c.\TOs llR:\r'r _,.?~ GF\ER:\I. I'L.\ X .- .4 ~ c~ X :\ LIGHT RAIL A ~ P ,! I G ?t 'c' .\ 1' E !. F li i-. \ ? Goal VLR-4 To provide opportunities for a variety of non- residential land uses within the Vasona Light Rail area. (VG 3.2 -revised) Policies Policy VLR-~.I De\•elopment in the Vasona Junction sub-area shall consist of neighborhood commercial uses that provide sen-ices to all residents of Los Gatos. (~'.PS.Z - re\•ised) Policy VLR--}.? Non-residential development projects shall limit impacts on residential uses. (V.L?.1 -revised) Goal VLR-5 To provide opportunities for the Vasona Light Rail area to address the recreational and open space needs of the Town. (VG 3.1 and VG.4.3 combined) Policies Policy ~•LR-i.l Projects developed in the Vasona Junction sub-area shall contribute to a pedestrian/bicycle bridge over Los Gatos Creek. (~'.P.~.~ -revised) Polic}- VLR-~ ' Orient development to take advantage of the amenities of the Los Gatos Creek and the Creek Trail. (V.L.-1) Policy ~•LR-~. ~ Development in the Vasona Light Rail area shall be ;f,~:`: designed and oriented to take advantage of the amenities offered by Los Gatos Creek and to presen-e R-atersheds, riparian habitats and R-ildlife corridors. (V.P.6.1 -revised) Policy VLR-;.4 Projects developed in the Vasona Junction sub-area shall contribute to and enhance the nanu-al vie\v corridor and landscape of the Los Gatos Creek Trail. (V.P.~.6 -revised) ~•LR-S 'r0w\ OF LOS GATOS DR~F1' 20?C G[\ FRA[. PLAti t':\SOXA LIGHT RAIL AXD HIGH\C;\Y SS ELE?lE\~T Actions Action VLR-5.1 Develop apedestrian/bicycle bridge over Los Gatos Creek through development fees, grants and other means available to the Ton•n. Establish in-lieu fees Eor new projects that will fund apedestrian/bicycle bridge over Los Gatos Creek. (V.L~.~) Action VLR-S? Provide a trail connection for pedestrians and bicyclists along Los Gatos Creek adjacent to Bonnie View Mobile Home Park and the Santa Clara Valley ~Y'ater District maintenance facility to complete the trail along the east side of Los Gatos Creek from Lark Ave. to the northern Town limits, in keeping with the Trails and BikeR•ays blaster Plan. (V.L6.4 -revised) Goal VLR-6 To work with property owners and prospective developers to facilitate orderly development. (V.I.7.4 split) Policies Policy VLR-6.1 Encourage innovative designs, phased design schemes and mires of uses in the Vasona Light Rail area that are consistent with the Los Gatos Boulevard Plan and Commercial Design Guidelines. (V,PJ.3 -revised) Policy VLR-6.2 Site plans in the Vasona Light Rail area shall be designed to minimize traffic impacts and to presen-e sufficient open space. (V.P.7.# -revised) Policy VLR-6.3 The siting, scale and design of buildings in relationship to each other shall facilitate and encourage pedestrian activity-. (V.P.~4.2 -revised) VLR-9 TOU"\ l1P LOS G.ATC}S URA FT _-,. GE~ER:\t. PL:\ti ~":~~i-!~ A i IGH1' R:\IL ~XD HIGH\t A}' 89 ELE \f E\ T ACtlOnS Action ~'LR-6.1 Adopt design guidelines for the Vasona Light Rail area and use them to review development applications for issues unique to the area such as gates-ay features, scenic vistas and open space provisions. (V.L•1.1 -revised) Goal VLR-7 To ensure that the design review process produces a high quality mixture of residential and non- residential uses within the Vasona Light Rail area. (V.G.~.2 -revised) Policies Policy ~- LR-7.1 No don•nzoning of residential properties shall be allon-ed within the Vasona Junction sub-area until de\-elopment of the t'asona Light Rail is planned and funded. (~'.P.i.l - revised) Policy ~"LR-7? De\-elopment may be phased n-ith the completion of the Vasona Light Rail. In no case ma}' development exceed u-anspol-tation capacity. (V.L~.1 - re.•ised) Policy ~'LR-7. ~ De\-elopers may be asked to pro.-ide sun~evs, market studies and other information deemed necessary to ensure the projects are consistent R-ith the Los Gatos Boulevard Plan and Commercial Design Guidelines. (~'.L7.i - re\•ised) l'LR-1~ ~-o\c~~; or Los c.\TOs DR:\f'r 20?v G Ei'i CRA L PL:\ ti \' A 5 0\ A L I G f i T R :\ I L A X D H I G H U' A Y S i E L E \1 E X T Goal VLR-8 To limit the adverse impacts of development within the Vasona Light Rail area. (V.G.4.1 -revised) Policies Policy VLR-8.1 Development in the Vasona Light Rail area shall facilitate the upgrading of utilities to the level needed to serve the area n-hen it is fully developed. (V.P.4.~ -revised) Policy VLR-8? Development projects in the Vasona Light Rail area shall incorporate design features to buffer dwelling units from the visual and noise impacts of Highn-ay 17 and High~-ay 8~. (V.P.6.2 -revised) Policy VLR-8.? Require a noise study for all development applications n-ithin the Vasona Light Rail area, identifying degrees of impact and noise attenuation measures, if necessary, to mitigate noise impacts on residential neighborhoods. (V.L6? -revised) Actions Action V'LR-8.1 Construct an emergency access to Lark Avenue via the Santa Clara Valley Water District maintenance road for properties 6etR•een Los Gatos Creek and Oka Road through conditions on development applications. (V,I.63 - revised) Action VLR-81 Conduct a study to explore methods of financing infrastructure improvements in the Vasona Light Rail area. (V.I.7.4 -split) VLR-11 TC)u ti l)F LOS G:\TOti DR:\FT _27 GE\ F.R.-\ f. P1..-\ .~:\ti~i\A Lick-iT R:\lL AXp HGis \C'.-1 l~ 85 ELE V E\T Goal VLR-9 To reduce traffic impacts of residential development within the Vasona Light Rail area b\~ taking advantage of mass transit opportunities. (~ G ?. ~j Policies Policy VLR-9.1 Residential development proposals n-ithin the Vasona Light Rail area shall address hon• they take advantage of V mass transit opportunities. (V.P?.? - revised) Policy V LR-9.? The Ton•n shall n-ork R•ith developers, the Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority (VTA) and other / agencies to ensure that the Vasona Junction sub-area is developed in a manner that takes full advantage of the transit opportunities afforded by the Vasona Light Rail and any mass transit provided in Highway 35. (V.P.~.-4 - re\•ised) Policy VLR-9. ~ Development in the Vasona Light Rail area shall provide -. Transportation Alternative programs or facilities that help link development and mass transit. These programs may include providing bicycle racks, shower and locker facilities, transit passes to employees, etc. In-lieu fees or other funding mechanisms may be required to provide a shuttle for the area. (V.I.1.? -revised) Polity \ZR-9.•4 Facilities developed for the Vasona Light Rail station and Highway- Si mass u-ansit connections shall be sate, convenient and attractive for bicycle and pedestrian use. Polic\- VLR-95 Promote the development of mass transit links between _ Los Gatos Boulevard, particularly amp development on the North Forty site, and the planned Vasona Light Rail station. (nen-) VLR-1?