My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2001-013-Denying A Request To Construct A New Family Residence On Property Zoned Hr-2 1/2 And Remanding The Application To The Development Review Committee Architecture And Site Appli
LFTOWN
>
Clerk
>
Resolutions
>
2001
>
2001-013-Denying A Request To Construct A New Family Residence On Property Zoned Hr-2 1/2 And Remanding The Application To The Development Review Committee Architecture And Site Appli
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/4/2011 10:31:13 AM
Creation date
10/1/2009 5:10:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Clerks
Docs Ref Code
RESO
Item Ref
2001-13
Doc Date
2/5/2001
County Recorder #
CLK
Retention #
COM
Notes - Clerk
RESOLUTION GRANTING AN APPEAL OF A DECISION FROM THE PLANNING COMMISSION DENYING A REQUEST TO CONSTRUCT A NEW FAMILY RESIDENCE ON PROPERTY ZONED HR-2 1/2 AND REAMNDING THE APPLICATION TO THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE ARCHITECTURE AND SITE APPLICATION S-00-22 PROPERTY LOCATION :15350 SUVIEW DRIVE PROPERTY OWNER -APPLICANT - APPELANT : CHARLES HACKETT
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />RESOLUTION 2001-13 <br />RESOLUTION GRANTING AN APPEAL OF A DECISION FROM THE PLANNING COMMISSION <br />DENYING A REQUEST TO CONSTRUCT A NEW SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE ON <br />PROPERTY ZONED HR-2 '/2 AND REMANDING THE APPLICATION TO THE DEVELOPMENT <br />REVIEW COMMITTEE <br />ARCHITECTURE AND SITE APPLICATION: 5-00-22 <br />PROPERTY LOCATION: 15350 SUVIEW DRIVE <br />PROPERTY OWNER /APPLICANT 1 APPELLANT; CHARLES HACI~ETT <br />WIIEREASs <br />A. This matter came before Council for public hearing on January 8, 2001, on an appeal by <br />Charles Hackett. from a decision of the Planning Commission andwas regularly noticed in conformance with <br />State and Town law. <br />B. Council received testimony and documentary evidence from the appellant and all interested <br />persons who wished to testify or submit documents. Council considered all testimony and materials <br />submitted, including the record of the Planning Commission proceedings and the packet of material <br />contained in the Council Agenda Reports dated December 27, 2000., along with subsequent reports and <br />materials prepared concerning this application. <br />C. Applicant is proposing to construct a 7,272 square foot two- toryresidence including a 1.,284 <br />square foot basement, and an 849 square foot garage on an undeveloped 1.023 acre lot. <br />D. The Planning Commission first considered the application on July 26, 2000 and continued <br />the matter to allow the applicant to review the plans in response to concerns raised. The Commission <br />considered revised plans on .September 13, 2000 and again requested revisions to .address concerns. On <br />November 15, 2000 the Commission considered revised plans that reduced the house by 482 square .feet <br />from t11e previous set of plans and found that the applicant had not satisfactorily addressed the concerns <br />raised by the Commission. <br />1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.