My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2001-048-Denying Appeal Of The Planning Commission Decision To Approve A Conditional Use Permit For A Master Plan Of Hillbrook School And To Approve An Architecture And Site Application To Demolish An Existing Classroom Building.
LFTOWN
>
Clerk
>
Resolutions
>
2001
>
2001-048-Denying Appeal Of The Planning Commission Decision To Approve A Conditional Use Permit For A Master Plan Of Hillbrook School And To Approve An Architecture And Site Application To Demolish An Existing Classroom Building.
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/23/2011 12:20:55 PM
Creation date
10/1/2009 4:55:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Clerks
Docs Ref Code
RESO
Item Ref
2001-48
Doc Date
5/7/2001
County Recorder #
CLK
Retention #
COM
Notes - Clerk
ADOPT RESOLUTION DENYING APPEAL OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION DECISION TO APPROVE A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A MASTER PLAN OF HILLBROOK SCHOOL AND TO APPROVE AN ARCHITECTURE AND SITE APPLICATION TO DEMOLISH AN EXISTING CLASSROOM BUILDING ON PROPERTY ZONED HR-1.
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Conditional Use Permit for the Master Site Plan which includes the plan for demolition and <br />reconstruction of the classrooms for the Architecture and Site Application. <br />D. Planning Commission considered this matter on April 12, 2000 and approved the <br />applications subject to conditions. The decision of the P1amling Commission was appealed. Town <br />Council considered the appeal on June 5, 2000 and remanded the matter to the Planning Commission <br />with directions that the plans and design be evaluated for traffic study and calming measures, <br />enrollment limitations, and student activity scheduling. <br />E. Planning Commission reconsidered the matter on October 25, 2000 and approved the <br />applications subject to conditions. <br />F. Appellants claim that the Planning Commission erred or .abused its discretion and <br />erroneously failed to consider traffic issues and that this was an issue or policy over whiciz the <br />Commission did not have discretion to modify or .address, but which was vested in the Council for <br />modification or decision. Appellant Dermer is concerned with traffic impacts on Marchmont Drive <br />while appellant Taylor is concerned with the opening of the Ann Arbor gate and traffic impacts on <br />Ann Arbor Drive. <br />G. Council finds as follows pursuant to Town Code section 29.20..300 that decision of <br />the Planning. Commission was correct, but that .additional time was necessary to determine the <br />efficacy of traffic volume control measures instituted by the applicant and to set appropriate <br />numerical goals and other enforcement mechanisms as conditions of approval for the use permit and <br />.architecture and site approval. <br />IZESOI,VEDo <br />1. The appeals of the decision of the Planning Commission on Proj ect P12J-99-062 and <br />PRJ-99-063 are denied. Attached hereto as Exhibit A are Revised Conditions of Approval for LTse <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.